The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2006-09053; TDR2006-09031 LL _° Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: '727-562-4567 Fax: 727562-4865 f /SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION CcY SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and . application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded :nto sets t9-' SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ / ?, 0 5' 0 CASE # RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINAL. RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEh'_IIILE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Inffll Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006) -PLtASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Dovl_- MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: _l / U CELL N MBER. PROPERTY OWNER(S): - ?..?1._...._. __1,..1.. 2.tn l..S..__:. w : List ALL owners on the deed ........ _- ._..: - _._...- .... ._._._.......__._. ._..._........_..._..... .._._. . ................ AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 16 .3 G...?Z_!j,..... (yC?.>"..g .. 0.. .... _.__..._._.---._....__...,___.__..__......_._.._........._... ( % CELL NUMBER: q ' / . E-MAIL ADDRESS:.-? E?G??t!c5_l_ 't?i!tilt),_'_dr B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INF=ORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) 'R.OJECT NAME: 3TREET ADDRESS PROJECT VALUATION: $ eo 'ARCEL NUMBER(S): 'ARCEL SIZE (acres): PARCEL SIZE (square feet): EGAL DESCRIPTION: . , ROPOSED USE(S): I I l/ d O ESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: pecifically identify the request 1clude number of units or square _.._._............. _.... ............... _._.... _..... _...._...__..___..,.......... _..... _.._......_........................... .__._......... _..... _.............. ..._.:__...... ,.... _............ ..._......_.._.......---__.-.....__.._........._...._._................__.__._.............. ............ ... otage of non-residential use and all quested code deviations: e.g. duction in required number of _ ......... ......_.._........_.............................._.._.:_._..._.._...._................_........_....__.._._ -.................. _-....._............ _............ ---....... _............... ............. ---...... _..--........ .......... irking spaces, specific use, etc.) X:1Clw Applicafions12006 Applicatior,slt--omprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNITI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES V NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4.-202.A.5) l1' SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D 2. 3. 4. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in whic is located. ------------ The proposed development will not hinder or discourage.- the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significan impair the value thereof. - --------------- - ------ The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use The proposed development is designed tc minlm'ze traffic congestion. The broposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. _...._..__..._._.....-_.....aSL. ....._a 4 ... 'i.e ._..---.._.--.-................ _.._._....................... - _............ _........ _..... ............ -..._.. _.._........._.........._.-..._._. The design of the proposed development minimizes adver:3e effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hourspps?,lpg impacts, or adjacent properties. tt::tt yY???v _._.__._........ -_..__........ ..... .._....... .......... _......___ _............_..... _......... .... .........._........__..._...__._..._.__. _ PLANNIf3G-DEPi4RiMf NT. EAB?t/ATER h it tly X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Comprehensive Infll Project (FLD) 2006.0l.doc Page 2 of 8 0 0 WR TTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations. from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. .._...... .... _......... _..... ...........__..S e....._... ...... ..................... --................... ..._...... _._....... ....... --............ _.._....... _____._.._....._....._.....__.._ 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent, with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning distrlct 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and Improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. __ ._.__..._..._... _ ... ..., :P.2.....__.GL... ?f tx(!_............. ._._......... __......... __._..._._....._..__....__..._._ ..............:....._......._._.__..._....._....._......... ...._.._.... --................ .... ...... ............. -- _ 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted In this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result 'n a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of, a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility, with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually Interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos; balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ORIGINAL ? Building stepbacks; and RECEWD ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development. provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distancgs,etwee buildings. Ull.•1 206 _ ____.____ __P.-LAQII?IAIG•?C?AR?}ylERi? X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 3 of 8 0 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202,A.21) 0t-/A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildi.igs, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; - o Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; / L9' Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; l/ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ff? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control. plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. V Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; C? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT .(SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable +AtA," QZ CKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Stormwater plan as noted above is included - y - Stormwater plan is not required and exp!anation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FORA STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. if you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and loc)of including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; pprepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, refle ting size , canopy drip lines) and conditisuch trees; dtbGu?.?o r. ?' Ci` ? ?wlM? , SP4 ,/ ? s e LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; tC? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (le. Reduce number of spaces). 1 Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; a_ GRADING PLAN, as applicable; /pq PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL DEC .14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER X:\Ciw Applications\2006 Applications\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 4 of 8 r • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:., (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot Interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material: _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; n .. a Location of all outdoor fighting fixtures; and ?t-Ot4 rill aS.Q?f' MI's ? t y?;ti •? - /?ocation of all existing and proposed sidewalks. r ZI SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and propose development, irl written/tabular form: Q Q S1,4e. r a?EXISTING Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R,); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: REQUIRED PROPOSED One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; ORIGINAL Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); RECEIVED _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); DEC 1_ 4 2005 _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; PLANNING DEPARTMENT - rlTy or I EAR-WATER X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 5 of 8 0 - 1 0 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) tZ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (no'. to exceed 24" x 36"): _ I existing and proposed structures; 'NIames of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required-perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ chedule; _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, inclucing botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and _ percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8X 11. J.. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including l_oc?tion, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ap'Ai ryo"5 t wy4u SQ; OW"X'2 felmi+- ?-Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). U V ORIGINAL ?V71 Reduced signage proposal (8'/z X 11) (color), if submltting Comprehensive Sign Program application. RECEIVED ?, tt DEC 14 2nns PLANNING DEPARTMENT X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Comprehensive Infili Project (FLD) 2006.01M OF CLEARWATFR Page 6 of 8 • 1 0 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-2021.13 and 4-801.C) O,d include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or Intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic; Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. t -__`Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must Initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study Is included. The study roust include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections Identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the Impact o- this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkl , standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2 4 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. cknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): . Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study Is Included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION QPJG E RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. RECEIVED If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. DEC 4 2006 ruvV11U14%7 UCr1%W1 tCIV1 I M. 'SIGNATURE: I, the unders?6ned, acknowledge that all representations made in this a . lisation are true and accurate to the best of my knowle Wand authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. of ftan cr' d before me thi day ISo A.D. 20.D _ d/or by sonally of uco lure of property owner or representative XACiw Applications\2006 Applicatons\Comprehensive Infili Project (F Page 7 of 8 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIZ JEFFREYIZZO y Commission Expires Nov 14, 2009 Commission # DD 450540 Bonded By National Notary Assn. IF F ' N, ?AIFIIIAVIT TO At1Tt•IS' PfZr= AO-!ENT: r ?. tlAanaMosof Bit prdpcrlyvmwr; ondow-•pRjW.A tam": 2. Mill PIMAMr ara) Aha owr+er(st and rocvru Ufkr rluraerfs'1 of H1n totlowNi4a4*2ibad prnpa"y (dMsss ce genwl lekAtW)_ 3. T1181 thts PM MM)i r onxtiftAos t p fo %liich a re I /W w {rl"aiba rerly*+t) , 4, nalt tlte'uad6mignad (tlae/hidvA) apOnMd Snd ( MI Iket ,,Q sS (hta Nltl Agr vital to flMaWte arty pQftw of othot' d tttttt flUVOWWY to ulrgci Wdlr palitfon: s. lut IN& ankl8vit hk$ boon a-WW J0 a to pfut ce the city of , Amster,-FIWA (a riskier and at W nss Aba%b t**(;000d pMimtty. R, hat Vto vlWts to r p rty are nccxwoery wOty rcp vntattvca in 0mor b pwess ftna apowatm ancf the is Iff logwrim-aty Pr MMilla iYes t Wt bhoWgr0h tho property IfeW ih Wx siMAr.-,JWn; 7. ha) (Mare}, th so duthorNk. heat y wdiy that 4: 6revoing to Mw end carriicl. ' Pltiparyi t?dstar ...W _ ..... .- ?rftj f?nei .., . ?._ ... - •-- • - r ._?taix:clyt?wiuv' -• '»--•---._.._.,?._ _.....-?t?rriPertyfl'artsr' . _.. ._.. 9 E OF FLOR..IDA, uNlY OF PIMLLLA8 BAfong rblr dtu und'grAlgtxtH,.-m tidnC?r U"' cgr[unr39 lupbe-eo #nd Qys iFw t?laho firNj+ Undetstends ttte n d rtha 10ws C4 I" $tal(f at FlaXrltr, tM.. trti5 ?/ ?aY ttt (, t' stf into *ttidti4it't1?st 2W!/6itN pfHMttf. __._ Plafar _. o Sip riuq (P AMY I.SNYOER MY GOMMISSION #DD361665 EXPIRES: OCT 10, 2008 lorded through 1st State Insurance i ORIGINAL RECEIVED ?? hD7c?dors+neirowaM1 t+At r+n,rn lrlo).1?°Jr160 Q'$glsxl;iR DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTh CITY OF CLEARWA -Illrf 1 1 e'°P+er'tr hrt`a?4 :?^, 09/24/2006 10:20 5617440072 t ?I LETTER F AUTHORIZATION THs letter wiil s8r a as authoft '_Ion for _ "om Ghp?raaa . I?? Afartie; vAth NOW M& to act as an agent for L on R. VMtshurst. PAGE 02 And to execute any and all 4* ents related to securing permits ,ilk approvals for the oumtruou o oo the property generally located at C.onw of Mars _.._.T..?_..... _ (Property I Avenuo anal ftyal Way. CWan . PINEL Goo Y1 Stage of FI„'RIt Signature of Praper4y Owner I/S d Address of -Property 1cWState p Cad6 ty 06 f? r AMY I, SNDER MY COMMISSION'#DD361665 EXPIRES: OCT 10, 2008 Bonded through 1st State Insurance , EAL ABOVE) The fo 49 instrument was oOmWedge befom me this 6 pf . 2c?, by Ili ?I ?.v? as _ Wha Is per C. r>al rlWlcnoasM to mo or who has pvduW _ as! der?t an and who did (W_rtcA) t $n oath. 3# Don R. Whitshurst Print Narrte of Property Owner Owner Titre 702- 75-4 >77k Telephone !dumber NoUwy Public (Name of Notoy Typed, PrInW or Wmpad) ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLd . kNApg,P RTMEM CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RFr N.? Exhibit A to Flexible Development Application r K" 2007 PLANNING Ok+,;r%i IviFNT 635 Mandalay Avenue - Tiffany Terrace CITY OF CLEARWATER NES Project # 0639 Description of Request: Flexible Development approval to allow a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of commercial floor area) in the Tourist (T) District with reductions to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 6 inches to building (zero to overhang), a reduction from the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet to the building and a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 10 feet to 0' to pavement for trash staging area. Also, an increase to the allowable building height from 35 feet to 59'9-1/2 (from BFE) to mid-point of roof, a reduction to the on-site parking requirements from 22 on-site spaces to 18 on-site spaces, to allow a reduction of the dimension required for stacking of vehicles as per Section 3-1406 B.2. from 20' to 16' and to allow a minor encroachment into the sight visibility triangle. Additionally, a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from 5 feet to zero feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program where the building is located at a 6 inches setback and under the provisions of Section 4-1402 a request to allow the transfer of one density unit from 689 Bay Esplanade. General Applicable Standards (Section 3-913 (A)): 1. The subject site is located within the Tourist District and is designated Old Florida District within the Beach by Design program. The site is currently vacant and previously contained a gas station. The surrounding sites are developed with a mixture of retail, service establishments, over-night accommodations and attached dwellings. Many properties within vicinity are being demolished and new attached dwelling buildings will be constructed or are currently under construction. The proposed mixed use development providing a five story building with eight attached dwellings, limited commercial/retail area with parking on the ground level is consistent with the newly adopted Beach by Design Guideline for the Old Florida District. The coverage and density of the proposed development is appropriate for the site and will be consistent with the approved development trend for the vicinity and the existing built environment. 2. A noticeable amount of sites within the area are exhibiting signs of age and deferred maintenance. The proposed development and subsequent improvements will substantially increase the value of the subject property, thereby providing a positive influence on the surrounding property values which typically encourages reinvestment in the surrounding sites. The value of the property is estimated at $5,300,000.00 upon completion. 1 0 . 0 3. The proposed design of the development offers positive health and safety rewards for the neighborhood by providing a new structure that meets or exceed current building codes and FEMA requirements. Further, additional health and safety rewards will be realized through the site design which provides a parking plan that is completely contained within the footprint of the building with one driveway access onto Royal Way; new public sidewalks will be established as a part of this design proposal. Although the building line at the driveway entrance appears to be located within the sight visibility triangle, no obstruction (structure) will be located between 30 inches above grade and 8 feet above grade as per Section 3-904 of the Community Development Code. Additionally, the proposal provides for responsible site drainage which will better serve the community as a whole. 4. The proposed development and site design provides appropriate access to the site by providing a single driveway entrance along Royal Way in lieu of Mandalay Avenue. The proposed access along Royal Way meets the standards set forth in Section 1.(7) of the Beach by Design guidelines. Additionally, the proposed eight unit attached dwelling with limited commercial space will not create traffic congestion within the neighborhood and will create far less traffic than many other uses allowable within this zoning district and the previous use of the site which was a convenience store/gas station. Eighteen on-site parking spaces are provided allowing each residential unit two spaces with the two remaining spaces being assigned to the owner/operators. of the proposed commercial spaces. Although a 4' reduction to the required 20' stacking dimension is being requested, there actually exists 30' from the first parking space to the right-of-way, providing sufficient stacking space. To provide additional safety, the two parking spaces located closest to the garage entrance will be assigned to the owners/operators of the commercial space creating less vehicular activity nearest to the entrance. The additional on-street parking spaces being created along Mandalay Avenue adjacent to the site; together with the limited commercial space associated with this development, provides mitigation of any anticipated negative parking issues. It should also be noted that there are 438 additional public parking spaces available within a 1,000 feet of our subject property providing many additional parking opportunities with in walking distance. 5. The proposed.Millennium Mediterranean design of the building reflects an old Florida vernacular with the proposed building finishes and lines; mixed with a Mediterranean flare providing elegantly appointed Mediterranean style roofs and varying roof lines; and is in keeping with the desires of the Beach by Design program. The proposed design is consistent with many recently approved developments in the immediate vicinity such as; Ocean Breeze, the Larissa development, Chalets on White Sands while remaining harmonious with the various designs of the existing developments and commercial uses in the immediate area. The design provides multiple step-backs and contains varying 2 • • roof lines which will assist in providing visual relief, interest and street appeal. Through sustainable materials and symmetrical design, the presence of this mixed use development will enhance the transitional aspects of the -recently modified Old Florida District. The recently adopted amendments to Beach by Design allow the proposed commercial development close to the street enhancing the pedestrian experience; and the proposed mixed use development furthers the visions and goals of the Beach by Design guidelines by providing the desired community character. 6. The proposed design provides for a new building and site amenities which will minimize any adverse effects by including appropriate parking designed completely within the foot print of the building, trash retention within the confines of the building with roll out to the alley only on the days of service. At this early stage, tenants for the limited commercial space have not yet been determined. The developers envision-the elegant commercial space being utilized by either high end retail establishments or professional offices, both with daytime and possibly early evening hours of operations further minimizing any adverse effect to adjacent and/or surrounding properties. The building design offers stepbacks which will reduce any visual impacts for motorists and pedestrians along Mandalay Avenue. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria (Section 2-803 (C)) 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. RESPONSE: Although the proposed mixed use is an allowable and required use within the Beach by Design guidelines for this parcel; mixed use is not specifically addressed in the Tourist District; requiring this development proposal to seek approval as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district RESPONSE: The proposed uses contained within this mixed use development are permissible uses within the Tourist District and the development is consistent with the goals and policies outlined within the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. RESPONSE: The proposed development will further the visions and goals for Clearwater Beach and 'Mandalay Avenue, providing encouragement for appropriate improvements and developments in this area. 3 • 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. RESPONSE: No detrimental effects are anticipated with this proposed development, as appropriate shielding of vehicles is being provided, the proposed mixed use and design is permissible within the Beach by Design Guidelines. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c.. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. RESPONSE: The uses proposed within this mixed use development are permitted within the Tourist zoning district; and the proposed mixed use development meets the goals and objectives of the Beach by Design Guidelines. The proposed development is located in an area that is comprised of similar uses, such as: retail, attached dwelling and overnight accommodation uses. Further, development of this vacant land will increase the tax base and the occupants/owners will provide contributions and support to the local economy. 6 Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; RESPONSE: The proposed development will further the visions and goals for Clearwater Beach and Mandalay Avenue, providing encouragement for appropriate improvements and developments in this area. The proposed mixed use development requested reductions meet the intent and guidelines established within the Beach by Design Program. 4 0 0 b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; RESPONSE: The reductions requested to the front, side and rear yards comply with the design guidelines. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; RESPONSE: The design, scale and intensity of the proposed mixed use development provides a five story building with eight attached dwellings, limited commercial/retail area with parking on the ground level is consistent with the newly adopted Beach By Design Guidelines for the Old Florida District. The coverage and density if the proposed development is appropriate for the site and will be consistent with the approved development trend for the vicinity and the existing built environment. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: RESPONSE: In an effort to comply with the "Old Florida District" Recent Code Modifications, we find that we are in compliance with many of the required "Comprehensive In-Fill" design elements. In Particular, we have provided a visually interesting appearance thru the use of (2) Building step backs of 64" and T-0" resulting in 3 Horizontal building planes. The Utilization of an earthtone color on the first (2) floors with a lighter color above provides for a visual pedestal, resulting in the appearance of an extended foundation, minimizing the height of the overall structure. The use of a hip roof while being visually pleasing is the most efficient and least wind resistive form thus reflecting the need for protection within our Hurricane Zone. The extensive use of balconies and thin metal balusters helps to provide a transparency to the exterior facade. We believe that the Architectural quality of this structure will greatly enhance the Old Florida District. • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. RESPONSE:. The proposed development meets the goals and visions relating to appropriate buffer, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings as outlined in the Beach by Design Guidelines and offers building elements such as balconies, varying roof lines and step-backs providing further enhancement. 9 0 BEACH BY DESIGN OLD FLORIDA DISTRICT: The subject site is located within the recently amended Old Florida District of Beach by Design. This district is transitional between the higher intensity resort uses on Central Beach and the residential uses on North Beach. This development proposal contemplates a mid-rise building between 1 and 4 stories over parking. The mixed use project consists of eight condominium units and two street level commercial establishments and achieves the desired development trend along the Mandalay corridor. The proposed building height is within the acceptable limits of the Beach by Design guidelines and the building design offers substantial stepbacks; which will reduce any visual impacts for motorists and pedestrians. that may be associated. By providing varying building planes, depths, heights, setbacks and roof lines, together with the addition of the commercial units; the building achieves the desired "step back" affect, design and use called out in the Beach by Design guidelines. Greater than 60% of all elevations (excluding the north) will contain windows and ornamentation; displaying many Old Florida elements such as decorative railings and balconies, various levels, roof lines and columns (see legend contained on Architectural Plans.) The desired stepbacks are achieved by providing more than a 6 foot stepback from the 2"d floor roof to the 0 floor roof with an additional 7 foot stepback being provided from the 4ch floor roof to the 5"' floor roof The ground floor will be compatible with the new Old Florida District guidelines, with the introduction of commercial. space that will shield the parking from the street level. The Royal Street side and alley will have concrete block walls, full height and partial height with pilaster columns, similar to other approved projects within the district. The proposed setbacks are within the allowable limits of the Beach by Design Guidelines as the recently adopted amendments to Beach by Design .allow commercial development close to the street to enhance the pedestrian experience; and.the proposed mixed use development furthers the visions and goals of the Beach by Design guidelines by providing the desired community character. The landscape design provides seven tiers of plantings; this layering will add depth and lushness to the site and provide an enhanced pedestrian environment. The landscape design offers some planting that are considered Florida Fancy which is a higher grade than the Grade A plantings prescribed by the code. Additionally, virtually all open green space will be in-filled with beautiful plantings presenting a beautiful landscaped environment. 6 635 Mandalay Avenue - Tiffany Terrace FLD2006-09053 NES Project # 0639 EXHIBIT B RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENT RELATING TO VAULT JUSTIFICATION A vault has been utilized within this proposed design to accomplish the required water quality treatment and attenuation for the required 25 year design storm for the following reasons: 1. Per the geotechnical report provided by Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory, the seasonal highwater elevation for this site is located at or above existing grade making ponds impractical as the elevation of the land would need to be substantially raised creating additional drainage issues. 2. With the'required addition of the commercial area and the allowable zero setbacks permissible through the Beach by Design guidelines, adequate area to accommodate the ponds is not available. 3. Further, in order for this diminutive site to be viable for development, the area of the land can not be further diminished by creating ponds. The proposed vault will provide the site and community with the required water quality and attenuation, while make the best use of this unique property located on Clearwater Beach and Mandalay Avenue. For the reasons stated above, the installation of ponds would place undue hardship on the developer and therefore we respectfully request approval to utilize a vault system for this site. NES #0639 - Tiffany Terrace - 12/6/06 RMR/rmr ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER I `Clearwater C Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 &SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION Z SUBMIT SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) ??= APPLICANT NAME: -ow MAILING ADDRESS: 1-5 .!^__..F1,._....3yy Xq PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): _.W!L?,e? h..-_._.__.____..___-_-_._._____.._._.....__._......._._......-.____.._.__.....__.._.__.._...__._._.__..._....__..._.---._._._.._..___.._..__..--_-_ List ALL owners on the deed !` e-. (CJ?_tYl t!?:-- 5"--fvkLa"S .t....l.. T17C --.__ AGENT NAME: N_ u.5. ...__c??^/D_VS _ MAILING ADDRESS: Q_............ _S .......__.. .3.0.....1...?ile.aoWiL .t.._ L..... 75 5........._....__.._......._...."....._.._._..._._........_._._._...._._._ PHONE NUMBER: ?Ik_q'_.¢ FAX NUMBER: r7?=-4-?_?..?3 Q? - CELLNUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or.developed on the p rI proposed for the development. OR Wlhall be b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscap demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the escape standards. ?. 1 _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT_ X:ICiw Applications12006 Applications\Comprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 ?2. LIG'HTING: • • Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed indhe Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. - _ , n 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and opted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. ORIGINAL 4 PLA-NN N- NG?t? TC C- IT-7 OF THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this applicati are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge /a authorize City representatives to visit and photograp t property described in this application. property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL Sworn to and subscribed before me this ? day of A.D. 20 O d/or by t? produce d_,/_ 'perse y < > as identifi Lion. - X:IClw Applications12006 ApplicationslComprehensive Landscape Page 2 of 2 ?ha9 Notary Public - State of Florida y Commission Expires Nov 14.20 Commission # DD 450540 Bonded By National Notary Assn. A 0 0 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARRATIVE 635 Mandalay Avenue - Tiffany Terrace NES Project # 0639 Request: To allow a reduction to the required landscape buffers along a portion of Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet. 1. Architectural Theme: a. N/A b. To provide a landscape plan that is demonstrably more attractive the following are some of the measures taken: i. The proposed sable palms exceed the height and caliper prescribed by Code. ii. All proposed trees exceed the height prescribed by Code. iii. All proposed trees are of the Florida Fancy Grade exceeding the Grade A quality prescribed by Code. iv. Virtually all available green space contains drought tolerant plantings, no sod is required. Lighting: No outdoor lighting is proposed at this time and any future proposed light will meet required code. 3. Community Character: The proposed installation of over 600 new plantings consisting of 8 different varieties will provide. immediate visual rewards to the vicinity and community. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment and exceeds the requirements of Landscape Buffers within the Beach by Design Guidelines for the old Florida District. 4. Property Values: The number, size, quality and design of the proposed plantings will offer upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan: The newly amended Beach by Design Guidelines allows 80% of the property frontage to enjoy a zero building setback. The remaining 20% of the property frontage is required to have a landscaped area for a minimum of five (5) feet in depth. The remaining 20% may be located in several different locations rather than placed in only one location on the property frontage. The proposed design far exceeds this requirement; however, the Development Code requires this Comprehensive Landscape Program Application. The proposed landscape design contains seven levels of plantings and tree heights which will provide a greater feeling of depth. The plant selection is drought tolerant and salt tolerant and with no use of sod this landscape has the best chances for success in the adverse costal conditions. With the use of flowering trees and plants with variegated foliage, the landscape will be beautifully colorful all year round. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 pLAt4NING C IV OF LLEARWA ERA 0 9 11/8/06 Mixed Use Calculation for Tiffany Terrace - 635 Mandalay Avenue A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR =1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR ..................................................................1.0 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion .....................x 1,253 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building ......= 1,253 sf 4. Lot area ....................................................................... 12,218.sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) .................................. 1,253 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ...= 10,965 sf 7. Divide #A6 ..................................................................... 10,965 sf 8. Land area in an acre .........................................................- 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage ....................................................................= 0.251 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage ........................................................... 0.251 acres 11. Maximum density .............................................................x 30 du/acre 12. Number of dwelling units permitted ........................................= 7 DU 13. Proposed number- of dwelling units w/ 1 thru TDR .........................8 DU I- Z? CO WC W L N Q W ?U ? ?0 O rr ZO n. INVA L.=LS4 S -- - ItdV.?t...,•-1.94 E 1NV.i_L,=!.?14 ;J WPF *tu..-?- _ LAY Av wPF N DA ----- MA _- Ia?Cjl?tw?jN C>G ? r A W., 'X_ "Imilrol W' vox- (? , lk 4,0?0 so CONC. WALK 1•,,7 C? ttis O 'Z ? t?Zd 1 r t'z=+ C. AMP r 050 (IYPJ 0 1J ?? 8103. - i 1t ESN 0 s -S 't2" INM (1) STDRY C.B.S. ADDRESS No, 647 VAULT 1112"€'A>h AM IS r AL Mom awns sm ME A9gm ? s t A ? Z _ rNa A J A m Z clz SkR? X5,25 , SSt3R't ,/ ? ? ? i Cy?1SG' .ygr' Z ?f F mV ai f v? a C:= 0? Q d? y . ?o W? f _r V ? Z p-< a Ns O z o ° W 3 e EB #5936 NES Comm.: 0639 GJe.e a . e.?.v. Checked By: H.G. Issue Date: 11108/06 Revisions: 0 rn o. 0 0 N Z W Z aa O a OC a W z N a° S V? Z Z o a SCALE: i'=30' z a L y0riHO70 1n u ci C2.1 „ MN e.00[L. n.e. ?.[. YJU1 ?iIEiNY1L'11im117! .oF j? -- RZ?HS P AvEME Bp,SPHID?H V ARKS/ J 9 tV , ? ` n 4 Z ern ?Z C i1 0 0 12 o ? GAS I i .. '? ?•- FENCE D ?? C3 DA .. 6' HIGH ?,gOVE • ?PE LAND 9 v SlQRY S.S. C1)C `i Cl) SS CB S. d N ?'?4.g5 z C1?,F F EL :4,85 E • ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 0 e • TIFFANY TERRACE (NORTH) • TIFFANY TERRACE (EAST) 9 0 TIFFANY TERRACE MATERIAL SELECTIONS 3rd, 4t5`h FLOORS AND STAIR ENCL EXTERIOR STUCCO IST AND 2ND FLOOR EXTERIOR STUCCO ? y f M r 4 COLUMNS AND TRIM INNER PEACE 7443 SEIRRA SNOW 8475 MERCURY 826o ALL SCOTT PAINTS COLORS A 13 ROOF CERTAIN-TEED COUNTRY GRAY • TIFFANY TERRACE (SOUTH) offlFul 8w Mo PARKING STUDY FOR TIFFANY TERRACE CIVILO LAND PLANNIN6 0 ENVI RONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION 0 635 MANDALAY AVENUE CLEARWATER9FLORIDA NOVEMBER 13, 2006 NES # 639 ?E' • f vk? d:W ?v •1#i ' Z Ram A. Goel, Ph.D., P.E. #47 f ORIGINAL RECEIVED 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM NESTECHQMINDSPRINC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 DEC 1- 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • PARKING STUDY FOR TIFFANY TERRACE 635 Mandalay Avenue Clearwater Beach Florida BACKGROUND The 0.28 acre subject site is located at 635 Mandalay Avenue and is currently vacant. Prior to demolition, the site contained a service station with staging for four cars. The proposed plan for this parcel contemplates -development of a mixed use containing 1,253 square feet of commercial/retail space and 18 parking spaces on the ground level with 8 condominium units on the upper floors. The site is situated at the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Street, is located in the Tourist (T) District and is within the Old Florida District of Beach by Design. The Clearwater Community Development Code requires 2 parking spaces per attached dwelling and 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail space, requiring a total of 23 parking spaces for this development proposal. Utilizing Section 3-1405 of the Community Development Code which addresses shared parking the project would require 22 parking spaces at the highest sum. The proposed site plan provides a total of 18 parking spaces on-site, with a deficit of 4 on-site parking spaces. The proposed 8 attached dwellings will receive assignment of 16 of the on-site parking spaces with the 2 additional spaces being assigned to the operators/owners of the two commercial spaces. The Clearwater code provides for reduction of the required number of parking spaces in recognition of the special circumstances that exist on Clearwater Beach, Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required OR adequate parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. Beach by Design recognizes that approximately 40 days per year parking on the beach experiences its highest demand, also noting for an additional 140 days a year parking is at the next highest demand. Beach by Design further states that there are already enough parking spaces available to meet the demand for the remaining 185 days a year. This information logically speaks primarily to the higher traffic areas of the central, northern central and southern portions of the beach. The northern area of the beach experiences a much different reality; with its close proximity to the lower density residential portion of the beach a much lower vehicular volume exists. In order to achieve the desired mixed use environment, the commercial developments will need to rely heavily on the neighborhood element as an anchor. Additionally, it is widely recognized that shared parking will be necessary to realize the full development potential for this unique area of the beach. See Attached: ORIGINAL RECEIVED • (& Deleted • Shared Parking Diagram/Section 3-1405 (Exhibit B) DEC 14 2006 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SHARED PARKING DIAGRAM SECTION 3-1405 TIFFANY TERRACE WEEKDAY Night Day Evening Midnight 9 a.m. ' 6p.m. USE 6 a.m. 4 p.m. Midnight 8 Attached Dwellings (2 Spaces per Unit) 100% 60% 90% 16 10 15 Retail (1,253 SF) 5 Spaces per 1,000 GFA = 7 Spaces 5% 70% 90% 1 5 7 TOTAL 17 15 22 Highest Sum of Vertical Column 22 WEEKEND Day Evening 9 a. m. 6 p. m. 4 p.m. Midnight 80% 90% 13 15 100% 70% 7 5 201 20 0 • ns ?z z Cm,) r 0 u M m rp y? o M m oa Z --I m0 T _Q) v? EXHIBIT B EXISTING CONDITIONS Four municipal parking lots exist within 1,000 feet of our site, between Rockaway Street and Somerset Street. The four municipal parking lots provide a total of 294 parking spaces as follows: Municipal Lot #39 provides 17 spaces and is located approximately 213 feet from the subject site, Municipal Lot # 37 provides 52 spaces and is located approximately 373 feet from the subject site, Municipal Lot #38 provides 79 spaces and is located approximately 910 feet from the subject site and Municipal Lot #36 provides 145 parking spaces and is located approximately 938 feet from our subject site. Additionally, on Mandalay Avenue between Rockaway Street and Somerset Streets there are 144 on-street parking spaces. Therefore, within 1,000 feet of our site 438 public parking spaces exist. See Attached: • Parking Availability Study Map for Municipal Lot locations and on-street parking space location and count (Exhibit C) • Map Containing all Municipal Lots from Royal Way to Hamden Drive, Source: City of Clearwater Web Site (Exhibit D) • f xh }Deleted PARKING AVAILIBILITY STUDY For the purposes of this availability study, 438 parking spaces were monitored on Friday November 10th, 2006 from 6 pm to 10 pm and Saturday, November 11`h 2006 from 10 AM to 10 PM. The on-street parking spaces on Mandalay Avenue between Somerset Street and Rockaway Street in addition to the parking spaces contained within Municipal Lots 36, 37, 38 and 39 were monitored. On the evening of Friday, November 10, 2006 the peak was observed between 6 PM and 7 PM. During this time period approximately 62% of the parking spaces were occupied, leaving 168 unoccupied spaces. On Saturday, November 11, 2006 two peak times were observed, from 1 PM to 3 PM and then again from 6 PM to 8 PM, with approximately 80% of the spaces being occupied during these peak times, leaving 90 unoccupied spaces during the highest usage. See Attached: • Parking Count Tables for Friday, November 10, 2006 and Saturday, November 11, 2006 (Exhibit F) • Parking Count Graphs for Friday, November 10, 2006 and Saturday, November 11, 2006 (Exhibit G) ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3 "PA KING AVAILABILITY S 47?JDYrr SOMERSET ST. SOMERSET ST. CAMBR/A 5T• 32 l1 Q IDLEWILD ST. " 0 635 MANDALAY AVE. GLENDALE ST. (SUBJECT SITE) ROYAL WAY 13 HEILWOOD ST. LOT 139 (17 SPACES) 13 z m TREET PARKING ON- o W 2 S 34 o 3 LOT 137 AVALON ST. X?1111 N 7 u (53 SPACES) w .-o , 11 U 12 O? u i ?L ZO JUANITA WAY C3 Z ? g? KENDALL ST. a C C LOT 138 (79 SPACES) BAY ESPLANADE LOT 136 (145 SPACES) N Q o a ROCKAWAY ST. EXHIBIT C Northside PROJECT ADDRESS - 635 MANDALA Y A VENUE s TIFFANY TERRACE SHEET CIVL • LAND PLANNINC • ENVIRONMENTAL.- TRANSPORTATIO DA )3755 [t[.[RW TfA, FIOP MMD1°RW6.[OM """° °'° "[M' LL: .28 9 11T N[1T" [lN "` """""°" N DATE•• 11114106 DRAWN BY.• B. J. V. N.E.S. / 0639 • -G'!`e tt t f leK Amaj Ken Rv " w , I Ris h ra;f ri7 I r o W j Psit uyty t=?±C # 60 4 ? Page 1 of 1 0 I?j ,WrIgA-twvat Z Cp H N ? ? 45 w L Z C:3 p Z ? aV EXHIBIT D b31VMdV313 do A., 13 1N3IN1ddd3p 9NINNb'ld 9001 P l ,131 PARKING COUNT FOR 03M333b Friday, November 10, 2006 ftle180 TIME 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 0. 00 PM E CITY LOT #36 CITY LOT #37 CITY LOT #38 CITY LOT #39 WEST MAN DALAY AVE. EAST MANDALAY AVE. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL % OCCUPIED. 123 145 13 53 16 79 8 17 28 69 30 75 218 438 507 119 145 24 53 40 79 9 17 37 69 41 75 270 438 62% 102 145 15 53 36 79 11 17 44 69 48 75 256 438 58% 93 145 11 53 33 79 14 17 52 69 56 75 259 438 59% 58 145 5 53 24 79 11 17 28 69 30 75 156 438 36% West Mandalay Avenue = All on-street parking spaces between Rockaway Street and Somerset Street. East Mandalay Avenue = All on-street parking spaces between Bay Esplande and Somerset Street. EXHIBIT F (FRIDAY) PARKING COUNT FOR Saturday, November 11, 2006 TIME 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM PM 1 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 P.M. 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM • CITY LOT #36 CITY LOT #37 CITY LOT #38 CITY LOT #39 WEST MAN DALAY AVE. EAST MANDALAY AVE. TOTAL OCC. AVAILABLE OCC. AVAILABLE OCC. AVAILABLE OCC. AVAILABLE OCC. AVAILABLE OCC. AVAILABLE OCC. AVAILABLE %OCCUPIED. 94 145 32 53 24 79 6 17 14 69 8 75 178 438 41% 104 145 37 53 32 79 8 17 17 69 17 75 215 438 49% 115 145 44 53 35 79 10 17 28 69 30 75 262 438 60% 123 145 47 53 51 79 11 17 38 69 45 75 315 438 72% 123 145 47 53 62 79 12 17 48 69 53 75 345 438 79% 118 145 45 53 63 79 13 17 52 69 30 75 321 438 73% 102 145 39 53 61 79 12 17 41 69 23 75 278 438 63% 107 145 41 53 63 79 12 17 41 69 25 75 289 438 66% 120 145 45 53 69 79 10 17 48 69 39 75 331 438 76% 125 145 47 53 56 79 7 17 50 69 45 75 330 438 75% 125 145 47 53 55 79 10 17 55 69 53 75 345 438 79% 118 145 31 53 32 79 14 17 41 69 46 75 282 438 64% 101 145 34 53 24 79 11 17 28 69 23 75 221 438 50 % West Mandalay Avenue = All on-street parking spaces between Rockaway Street and Somerset Street. East Mandalay Avenue = All on-street parking spaces between Bay Esplande and Somerset Street. EXHIBIT F (SATURDAY) 831VMW310 AO A113 IN3W121`dd34 9NINMd1d Friday, November 10, 2006 Total Availability • 400 300 .200- 100-/, 6:00 7:00. 8:00 9:00 10:00 P.M. P.M. P.M. P.M. P.M. 9002 V L x_11 43AI3O38 IVNIE)WO ? Spaces Occupied EXHIBIT G (FRIDAY) 8U,VMdV31D 30,k"O 1143WIaVd34 ONINN`did 900Z V L ` - -A • Saturday, November 11, 2006 Total Availability 400 300 200 100 0 ,1 1 , 10:00 A.M 1:00 P.M. 4:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M 10:00 P.M. EXHIBIT G (SATURDAY) (IM3038 WNIEW1O ? Spaces Occupied CONCLUSION This study demonstrates, of the 438 parking spaces available within 1,000 feet of the project site a minimum of 90 parking spaces would be available within walking distance of the proposed development during peak hours. As the development plan associated with this project contemplates the establishment of new on-street parking spaces along Mandalay immediately adjacent to the proposed development, further mitigation will be provided. In conclusion, sufficient parking is available within walking distance of the subject site to support the minimal deviation to the on-site parking requirements for this development proposal. a G N ?U OCx 11.29.06 NES 639 RMR/rmr z? LLA ?Q a? W C9 U U- 0 z? g? 4 4 • 0 63?k a v y, Fla, Clearwater Etas & Reoue _ L t 1Q'Franktjn $trvot - Clea't'Watar, Florida 3375.6 Poo k W.tirka Admlhistratlon- nglneering 04part rrein t 100:8; fUl rft Mthub, Stilts 2500 -.Clearwater, Florida 33756 _ Fir&,7^(a1v and Hp r?p#1?a4r't?siest _ ._ ...., This wortcnheof in required to be) autlmlitad to and upprovad by the Authorlty Having Jurisdiction tARJ) prior to ORD meriting for any project that is more than 3 atodos or more than 30' In hirig)tt Aliava iturlowost Piro Dept vahlols accosa point or for airy oUtpr project ifik Will #oquire.an Autoinatlo Wet Stattdpips 3ystairl and/or Fire Pump before any ;permits for newflallding 9onstruGHrin, building oxpanslon or fire hydrants will be Issued by file City of Clearwater, information ariddosigiv mutt raniply with Farads 0(fiiding Code, Chapters - Piro Protoadon:9yotarris, Florida Elm Vrovi nitbon Coda to htoludo vpp1lca.4lri N1=FA Cana tUPPA 1, 13' Ito, Oil, 158,14,15, 20,201 and 1142 ArmaxH) and AVVWA M-17 - installation, Hold testing anvil C suintirnatic?.at Firs=riydrun a. Proluat Andre isa Lowden of nearest Fire Hydrant. Size of Water plain suppiving Fit* Flaw; $tpiic: . Q 9 pal. R0#l004!: poi 1writaitpa of toot gas a+* raidtlSya sa t)tp.6poi11k titre jibpf; Told Candado'd llnrfudeiaaach rriopy of 4a uaI fp' i ap t; t.oape?a ?a;y/sc?em arl P.itot CB." /9?' psi 41ltli? ?O ____. spin I 0A!-yf m'@wpOdd) NfPA Harartl Cinediffontlan, r ?r,su$ CtansWeUtlun Do2criiittan.iot I-inrnrdl mleetaettrti7rYNiiatlitV d6¢cri,iT/a,i..e16ianerialetit end ?arranenrrrc,k it ondlic.ritnl 0 1 / i mim a{H7?t1Dnai'tT!?'?*'s' it riAv aa. / U L/ TOTAL NEEDEp Fffl? l Li?Yi ?tJ F?:i ): ? / ?? i t t?l ISEXi$riF#GSYSTENtSUPPLYStiFFICIEN77t7MEET it,F,F.AQQVE? NO. vp: -^? • cotl?s'vrd9txndafda? 3 aEemCatnpaiTm R liciiXiiu NFPA{piiga d jf^nar Edition and C?thaY An )FCBhIa Gof4blFOr t4t;ts itech add7iiaiutt ahsao H roquirad. if "Projirct Includes a Phis Pumpt -supply fire fallowlrwp Fire ftun)p Iniorthavon: Pomp Cop-AY:, M ? gpin C11urh t?rflaeutia: _ _? y Pal Ritiad piti±ssutrt: _ _ T ? pp7 Prezbyr 6 1 Sp9$ iliryi _ ? psi a !D N 40>E.>i?jte S#ortiga Tank OwpCifyo). W O L SEP 2 9 2006 r? W to q?L Q Q W ?U zO z gu • Prol:arer Mama: / tacnpany fdama. r ^?^ 8rI?11ng.AZfdraa8: ?AQ . stagy: _ _ _L Q_ I[? _2_ Aifdit octal Itilnntunilon lu(uobit li zip: • JAMES M. C URTIS #37912 W-299 r'21j FAX 35x•586••1196 ?9 75 6AYHEAD Rr). Fire Pruvantion itoinh to be adiinrssed prior to DAC approval: t.. Provide Fire flow Calculati6691 WOtOr Study bra FIRS PR rIcTION i=NQINIFM O hsauro an gda lvgm Wr;ter stf{fi ty.la nvai al ld nhd fo ddtermTm 4 bray , urigredes are required by the daveldjtar due ?n the in5paet of thin gfaJboE.. fife water suapTy iiruat be 0d }a 3ttlppctft t a moods of any roqutrtd iite optl,)& l- r) stnndpipa e(rdlar No pump If a H(k tktifip to required fhe tNtitp'r suAply tryst ba abM to aupplY 150% 611%, ralgd cxijiraCl3Y. GompUptica yit?i the;S UOA hi-94 FirYa Pravonficn ?ro9alo Include NFpA i a, NFP ?. W?Pi, 2Q, NFPA E3.f, 4fid I.dtf A t t :Z (Antiox }l} is tisi{u}iet?: 2- Wthan•att Ft]G is tequi?ed, iCgtwil; ba'n minln ium <?t s 5 fmm tiuAttlnq pbd slttill have citr+o tfydrtttil'nAt(tln 40'. ?his hydTi?fit cliaii »t?t:faa ines3rrd on sdiria ptaih as tore Sprinkler end must be on supply 6idr: of drubR) deter 0rclwcit vatva: T}iis hydrant is to srddil{ait Eb ittetrydrettl'Utei is required Tray. tiretlglttinp purposes that lato•ba'wlthi» SOW orbuiWing an tFri', hotL lays who 61 4hosoma side a1 strarot as the ptdlest. Provide and show on the plan ntinirnuni301 turning raalostorsarerganey vehiata ingress and ograss gta l anfs'snce and exits: 4- Piovicip and allow on Ilia site lAon :23 ft.width at ddvewaye rdrive atstag for ergergancy vbhIcl# ingress sodmovesB fohhbntand Tear parking 1018. Where dove wry is bplit 4,Y an island with ono-way Prof ie atrclr side of tsfatid ptovtda and dhow on eta pleb a:rhlniirium 2 1 a tt width dilvdway an each side of tho Wand b f?[ovide firs tleprlrxniittit.'ai sea ra1#dWay (wino fiirii amund, Y, Tor Cur DwSec) in usCbrdar[ae+aiih NFhA -1.'Cit T}apprfrirent atci ya ncad4vary mubtt?avta o capable clf igpprutlrfq tfiaweit(htaltir$ gapadfasfit vpKicle3 bti;t}tioli s) 2A-1001 clam w dlhand td iobi vatticei Ggar9taee, and Dow' Water Supply Curve (M) Fire Safety Inc. Page 1 Tiffany Terrace Date 09-22-06 City Water Supply: Pump Data: C1 - Static Pressure : 69 P1 - Pump Churn Pressure 108 D1 - Elevation 25.120 C2 - Residual Pressure: 51 P2 - Pump Rated Pressure 90 D2 -System Flow 750 C2 - Residual Flow 1100 P2 - Pump Rated Flow 750 D2 - System Pressure 100.000 P3 - Pump Pressure @ Max Flow 58.5 Hose ( Adj City ) City Water Adjusted to Pump Inlet P3 - Pump Max Flow 1125 Hose ( Demand ) for Pf - Elev - Hose Flow City Residual Flow @ 0 = 2274.26 D3 - System Demand 750 Al - Adjusted Static: 62.504 City Residual Flow @ 20 = 1890.11 Safety Margin (C) 31.641 A2 - Adj Resid 41.641 @ 750 City Water @ 150% of Pump = 50.24, A3 - Adj Resid 25.036 @ 1125 180 AI + P1 168 156 144 P A2 + P2 132 R 120 E 108 I S D2 96 S 3 + P3 84 U 72 R 60 E C2 48 Al - 2 36 A3 24 12 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 FLOW N^1.85) ORIGINAI RECEIVED 4 2006 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 • • ,ILANNING DEPARTMENT "1n' OF CLEARWATER SEP-20-2006 09:43 From: To:,27 523 8595 P,2/2 SEP-20-2006 09:19 From : To:4475010 F? 2/2 09/19/2806 10:38 7274460036 WRTH ZDE ENG SVC„S . PAGEI 02/02 09/23/2806 1a:84 7275624961 PLI SIC Lr'ILITIES PACE 0:2 LOW TES, i CRY cw C 1AUR ' WAMCCPAMUMT ?®rae c omer o Q a a ell GUST M F4MMnM TEBT D . CAMBRIA S . R 6 611 W 00 IDLEWILD U Q W co GL 6„ 29 If f K•} I i}n 00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Horinside • CIVIL* LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • STORMWATER REPORT FOR: TIFFANY TERRA CE y'?{{1111?dj1?, r, ~ A Ram A. Goel, -T-h.W _?EA #-V431 _ ; { December 13, 2006 Project No. 063Q)RIGINAL RECEIVED 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 93.0 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRINCi.COM NESTECH©MINDSPRINC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The project is located in section 5, township 29 and range 15 in the City of Clearwater. The contiguous owned property is 12,218 sf and consists of the construction 8 condominiums and associated utilities, parking and road infrastructure, storm management system and utilities and results in the following: Construction of 354 S.F. of exposed impervious vehicular use area and 8,663 S.F. of new building and sidewalk area. This will yield an 9,017 S.F. INCREASE in total impervious area. The geotechnical report indicates a seasonal high water elevation equal to the existing ground surface. Because of this a concrete vault will be used so that storage volume beneath the seasonal high water elevation can be utilized. The weight of the concrete on the top and bottom slab and walls of the vault equal [2x90ftx20ftx(8/12)ft + 220ftx2.2ftx(8/12)ft]x150lbs = 408,400 Ibs'will be used to counteract the buoyant force of the water displaced equal to 90x2Ox2.2x62.5 = 247,500 lbs. Discharge is into the City of Clearwater stormwater system that runs north and south along Mandalay Road. 1/2" water quality attenuation is provided over the entire 12,218 sf yielding a total required treatment volume of 509 cf. This volume is provided in a vault under the parking. 720 cf of water quality is provided between elevations 2.5 and 2.9. Recovery of the treatment volume is provided by 15' of 6" underdrain within 24 hours. In addition, water quantity attenuation per the City of Clearwater will be provided so that the pre-development peak discharge rate for the 25 year storm at a time of concentration of 60 minutes will not be exceeded by the post-development peak discharge rate. This yields a required storage volume of 2,012 cf and will be provided in the vault storage capacity of 2,250 cf between elevations 2.5 and the design highwater elevation of 3.75. The peak discharge rate of 0.20 cfs is controlled by a 3.6" x 4.2" square orifice protected by a grease baffle located on the control structure. Overflow for discharges greater the 25 year design storm are through the top of grate set at an elevation of 3.75. Discharge from the control structure enters a 12" DIP and ties into an existing manhole on Mandalay Road at an invert elevation of 1.49. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 I)1At4NJNG C DSPARIMSt4l IER CIN • • PROJECT NAME: TIFFANY TERRACE PROJECT NO.: 0639 PRECONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 12,218 SF = 0.28 ACRES IMP. AREA= 0 SF = 0.00 ACRES POND AREA= 0 SF = 0.00 ACRES PERV. AREA= 12,218 SF = 0.28 ACRES C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 12,218 SF IMP. AREA= 0 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = PERV. AREA= 12,218 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.20 C-O-C 1/2 CREDIT FOR EXISTING IMPERVIOUS T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES POST CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 12,218 SF = 0.28 ACRES IMP. AREA= 9,017 SF = 0.21 ACRES POND AREA= 0 SF = 0.00 ACRES PERV. AREA= 3,201 SF = 0.07 ACRES C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 12,218 SF IMP. AREA= 9,017 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = PERV. AREA= 3,201 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C= 0.75 T.O.C. = 60 MINUTES 0.475 1 0.2 0.95 1 0.2 ORIGINAL RECENED DEC 4 20 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C"y OF CL?WATER PROJECT NAME : PROJECT NO.: VAULT STORAGE DATA LOW CHORD EL D.H.W. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= TIFFANY TERRACE 0639 • STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 4.00 1,800 0.041 2,700 3.75 1,800 0.041 2,250 3.25 1,800 0.041 1,350 3.00 1,800 0.041 900 2.90 1,800 0.041 720 2.80 1,800 0.041 540 2.70 1,800 0.041 360 2.60 1,800 0.041 180 2.50 1,800 0.041 0 VAULT STORAGE WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION =. -AVAILABLE WATER QUANTITY = 12,218 SF 0.50 IN 509 CF 2.90 FT 720 CF ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2106 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 PROJECT:. PROJECT NO.: NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS TIFFANY TERRACE 0634 VOLUME PROVIDED = 720 C.F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 2.90 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 2.50 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 1.75 K = 0.09 FT/MIN LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 15 FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH POND AREA (SF) = 1,800 S.F. POND AREA (SF) = 1,800 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HG FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 2.90 1,800 0.85 0.10 2.75 0.31 23 0.63 180 288 2.80 1,800 0.75 0.10 2.75 0.27 23 0.55 180 326 2.70 1,800, 0.65 0.10 2.75 0.24 23 0.48 180 376 2.60 1,800 0.55 0.10 2.75 0.20 23 0.41 180 444 2.50 1,800 TIME = 1,434 MINUTES TIME = 23.9 HOURS ORIGINAL RECEIVED CSC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 25 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJECT: TIFFANY TERRACE PROJECT NO. 0639 RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS PRECONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 12,218 SF 0.28 AC IMP. AREA= 0 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = PERV. AREA= 12,218 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C= 0.20 C-O-C 1/2 CREDIT FOR EXISTING POST-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C= 0.75 STORAGE CALCULATION 12,218 SF 0.28 AC 9,017 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 3,201 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = PRE-DEVELOPMENT (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TOTAL SITE AREA) DRAINAGE AREA = 0.28 AC TIME OF CONC. Tc = 60 MIN I @ Tc =60 (25 YEAR EVENT)= 3.60 IN/HR Q(out) = C x I x A= 0:20 CFS POST-CONSTRUCTION 25yr WEIR DESIGN WATER QUALITY REQUIRED = WATER QUALITY PROVIDED = TOTAL VOLUME REQUIRED = TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED = OUTFLOW INFLOW (CF) (CF) - - 25yr TIME I - 25yr Q(in) 25yr post pre STORAGE MIN. (IN/HR (CFS development, development CF 60.00 3.60 0.76 2,739 727 2,012 MAX. STORAGE = 2,012 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 1,.- 1 4 2006 TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= 3.25 FT BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= 2.90 FT PLANNING DEPARTMENT H = 0.35 Q = 0.20 C FS CITY OF CLEARWATER L=Q/3.3*H^1.5 =. 0.30 FT 509 CF 720 CF < 24 HRS. RECOVERY 2,012 CF 2,250 CF 0.475 1 0.2 0.95 1 0.2 635 Mandalay Avenue - Tiffany Terrace FLD2006-09053 NES Project # 0639 EXHIBIT B RESPONSE TO ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENT RELATING TO VAULT JUSTIFICATION A vault has been utilized within this proposed design to accomplish the required water quality treatment and attenuation for the required 25 year design storm for the following reasons: 1. Per the geotechnical report provided by Gulf Coast Testing Laboratory, the seasonal highwater elevation for this site is located at or above existing grade making ponds impractical as the elevation of the land would need to be substantially raised creating additional drainage issues. 2. With the -required addition of the commercial area and the allowable zero setbacks permissible through the Beach by Design guidelines, adequate area to accommodate the ponds is not available. 3. Further, in order for this diminutive site to be viable for development, the area of the land can not be further diminished by creating ponds. The proposed vault will provide the site and community with the required water quality and attenuation, while make the best use of this unique property located on Clearwater Beach and Mandalay Avenue. For the reasons stated above, the installation of ponds would place undue hardship on the developer and therefore we respectfully request approval to utilize a vault system for this site. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NES #0639 - Tiffany Terrace - 12/6/06 RMR/rmr 5PECIAL WARANTY DEED ' -: -44--4 9 0 4 nu. .8-7 7 . . KNOW-ALI- MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: - ; AI NILLIPS P KF,TING PROPERTIES; INC., a Delaware - - 7EK corporation Grantor, in consideration of the sum of+Ten.and No/100 Dollars (=10.00), and other'valuabls considerations,.in hand paid, the receipt of which is-iereby_ - °- • adltnridrledged, does Izeteby grant, bargain, sell and conveyAto - - - r 778 2s Z2 Way, Rffbk I TOt DUN R. WIMTHMT - of - Clearwater; - Florida •3 l ` Graniee, the following real property and premises, situate in the County of, Pinellas' - State-of • Florida -d - to wir. _ ° Tots one (l) and two (2),- -Block -&4-j -MAND$ A AY UNIZ _ • ' : 1 7` 5.0" "S according- to map or Plat thereof as recorded , •' 763*r fg i3t Plat Book 20, Page 27, public Records :o_ Pinellas" - '- ' 11 A- RA --2, M - rut 74-3 A?? rz Fit 3. IT low IA., c 119b -'o • 4? - V W W ` - cm Q together With all improvements thereon and the•appurtenances theTennto belonging, and ,wairants'? ? W w ° the title ohl.y against the claim of every person whomsoever claiming. by, through or under Grantor. V ,- U This deed is-s' °bject io all taxes and questions q( surrey, zonigg ordinances, restriction's and O U Z LL easements of record or in place.- O -: Z GAANTOR DOES NOT WARRANT EITHER IXPRESSLY OR IMPLI'EDLY,-THE CQNDITION OR g U FITNESS OF 3'HE PROPERTY-CONVEYED HEREUNIDER; ANY SUCH WARRANTY BEING HEREBY EXPRESSLY NI?GATIVED.' GRANTEE BY ACCEETANCt HEREOF ACKNOWLEDG S ' THAT RE HAS MADE= A -COMPLETE-INSPECTION OF'THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED REAL - PRUPET(TY AND ANY IMPROVEMENTS EQUIPMEZuT D THEREON AND IS I _ • ALL RESPECTS•SATISFIED THEREWITH AND ACCEPTS THE SAME "'AS IS". TO HAVE AND TO'HOI_D id described premises unto the said Grantee, his successors, heirs an?assigns'forever. - ' 'SIGNED AND DELIV$RED this._?/?day o(' lY' ?"'?Y \ 191 ;- - PHILLIPS MARKETING PROPERTIES.,-INC. By ice President 1 • , 7 `Phil instrurt sJ eFi d-by: y T _ Sweretg l? • .. ;/ ??. 'Ralph'W. Shelburne t llips Petroleum Company <(. .0. Box 4833' - ° , to T --GA 30302- • O n fS ? v ti ?w.f. Q/ V .. STATE OF OUAHOMA SS r ODUITY OF WASIMTCN ) :?? -- -- -_- . Before me, _, c ?? Y-? , a Notpry Public ;n and kor the statg and county a esaid and residing therein and duly commissioned, - sworn and authorized iiV said- State and in said CounAy, to take, acknowledgments, _ on this Vv?day 4f 19_U, personally appeared and ??ti k? JL 's whose names as,vice president and assistant secretary, respedtive]y,--of PHILLIPS MARKEE71NG PROPERTIES INC., a co2poratio? arm sk?rett tithe foregoing instrument and personally known to me and known to me to. be such officers and, who being ty- me duly sworn did say that they are such officers on ;half of such corporation and'that said instrument is, executed on behalf of such corporation, that the -seal _ aff>xed to said instrument is the corpdrate seal of said corporation, that said .instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of such corporation by authority of its Board of•Di'rectors and by the authority of the.bylaws of said corporation and the authorization of'sgid corporation, and said persons, being informedgof the. contents of said instrument, duly acknowledged the execution of said instrument as- such"-officers as their +ree and voluntary acts and deeds and the free and voluntary act and deed of such corporation for the uses, purposes-and considera- tion therein stated-and dedlared that the statements therein contained are,-true; and I do so certify. - 11otar.r RabIic 3artlesviIle, Oklahoma lty cc,,•e,fflislion exp? r es: A` 3 N. Z Z6 V 0 Z LA_ V CZ Z _?t © g U STA?SC+ pIORIDA th forego) g0is atrue j k1eteby certify records of ,. 1, p0 as eoorded In t e f ?? ' r r4 pinal County. 20 • is. dayo KEN 13 E k of C it Court By: U SEP-26-20p6 10;45 From: • To-0010 P.1/13 115:12 From: To: 156PqR963M pat's SECQI O AI DDIRNMINTt'0'CQNTRArCT VOR SALE AND PURCIRASE s THIS S£CONDAIDDERMM TO C(')N'1'RACTFgR SAJ.EANU,?I.JK(:HA3f i=i gti,t& by and batwmen Mi l WhileftLI t IiLd E. W hiwhursi, pRtri Gill Mpft*;nttdav a of ft CRtaic of DWttld x whitlhsut t, to 9dlor and PQAgi 'Pala, Be ftyor and is undo a pm of ow- CunlrtMI for l 11. tk RW Pum haw WWcw the Said Pmt having an tfeativt: dateofJwc 13. 20RI. 1W umei dad by that ccrlala AddMdutsl to Cq for ale end Puftt se, signed Punt S. 2005 and also Citb ;tive Jtwt 15, 2005. I• UN RONNIM4 AL CLEAN C)!a. It isaaknowlacl tl+ptScllcr'st q ' ? g?ccrti haivr? pruvic?d CLIO eetimws rcleting to tlta rsr dgv4l of soils &ozn a WWfied am of tha Gaud brad huve India cd that such removal rvil(4imimtc the pd9ft problem of rocurdng rcmlinp of Canuminants that extm;d "r6&0 lewh t"'0'-leanup"). The 00st Qf said 0- tsftatad by Idler's engrosses i bo Ina rapgc of 525,000 to S33,W0. T3-xpwiaa "wi h tt?o to tthtsto tt?ttsllx In the ettAt a:r?t;tl Cleanup. Any rleartup Costa in ctccasa of ?:iS;t30'U•{'? i1 ent(My the Stllar'1 Mipubsibilotyt J"vidxd. hovmva U in the ovens stleh casts exceed $35,000.00, thm Wer may CICC J ur wt'ninate this cositiw and Mot shell Wt W held to specific p etentix. of tjte elr.4c?np Of QV. Ittrxl. Suya r may, at Buyers option, 4imc to sharp O*A lly in WditloWtd ?CA*?S, in wbigh 4w, 8e11#rMq not tanlitmte theconftlw- s ite.r WMR pmoMody cam -q driBineers and COMMIM as Sdkr try ehmw for the AnMOW Of t+gmdering soils iti+am & subject pmporW, i aWv aAd Buyer ngrrx to deport ttte teary 6rS i 2?Soo.QO Cwhh vwitS the Lscrow Apmt. @u(W shall deMAit said wm witlilti bvo (S) *Ys agar AotiSOft R ft EscroW Agent tW SeZer ho dcposited their 512„S(x).tN), t pgtteaiag that Ikr's tlr>7tt for?Comphancr shall be iuNect to any court apprgva's 6 mey be required W d15b9rJwnW* l the CAW. Sand sum shall be held its Spef ew and ?e umi t0 paY fvr twttltt i&ted wM1& ClCtMvp. In the~ that the Escrowed amnunt l3bould N delamirlod to be imidwprste (il. j. casts es0mam wW 535,000), the partim shall dorwit, t mi% the bwft vquelly, such ocldllof,W&I modes as my be requirW to cover th i cowl coats up to a told aftti ulv" 60r8pycr of5I7,500.00. Excvt fora Seller &bWt ut der the Co11[Ct m all mm =vowed tin5"heanW gurPOM am Wit(04dablo in boy and all1evetnts KW t 9fMinadon Of Or default under to (:otytttttct dull oatltk ne-Ither party to a r+ ivId or the Claanalp escrow monlel. IfStllci?dofaulis in in abliptlnps under the Cewntrt t., that Sailor ShW 1 be: vbli 1o tit turn %0 Htty not fty the aft»eat ate'rnW deposit pWd by !'stayer under the Contract, but aw"fonds 4i tpy Buyer bo 11=aw AVM pumuant to thk par6smph for =Viroramaw clea dup. In th Leval tba the Cl aeup Costa *ould bo Ion than thb sums "emwed, then, up m 0on"M of the work, Escrow Agont shall dtab" such ex" tv them partka equal ty. III 2, LARNbST MONEY, 'flee mm THOUSAND amid 00/100 DOLI Simms & l kftwdwt, R.A. M or Carnost money ACp06it shAV tv tho sum uC TEN (SIU,tlW.t?Q). lW*paait 10 fie deliveNd to gt:awk, ?c Saptetyt1?r73?200s, bti"Ot'd 92089b7Z2Z:01 :wOJA 22:ZZ 9002-92-d3S SEP- 9t.D.4,Q-.i 10:45 Prom: 5 16=12 From' To:0010 P. 2/13 Ta t 0629MUM P.3.1 5 3. F ?$YBiL ITY %TUDY. Hayetre;l?asaihit;ey %tudy aheu *xpir00ctabv 3 t, 2005, ii2uyer rWtfliog Snlletthat $uyrtr ski to IPMM4teYl(M4*eFtuibiJitYPVic-d, Wyet shrill make a rhtiM dap mh in tbt stun OFMEEN TROUSAND tatd 00/100 DOLLARS, (S I i,000!00) by k. All earnest MM4:y dcpw'its *W) be non•reElt Wabte forwarded from Maack, !ilrnrntt & Hrornendcz, P.A. V Sdie' r. Iii 4. CLOSING. The closing "I Amur at the ofl8ocs of SUVWk, Simms & llernandcz, P,A,, (h meee (14) dvys z tc b i11a rcM'vi* Ito latter of no further action from;ha Stars of l IoriQ I-:nvif"Mtoloi P'ugAiun Agm ;, 5. COUNTFtRPARTS. This t may be acco d In tratMrp*M ate! any rucb dvautnsrre ao race?ewud by tititcr y nay be d=mW to wnedtM an atigirtal. o. REAFFMMA' ION. All t>tl ,T#M :g AN canditiM4 0 tho Copitracl not incositoislom hctcwith arc hereby a oAMW add WIfied. u ???? fem.-. . ,.............,.... ,. Mini whitiahurat, 5iclkv. >>. Glatt. 2-gr--pr aoA C. Whib?lt?ar Daft: 017t r,qz PMMJ FRtci, Buyer Dam. K UIWWMI9 VHUN AlAP#M,4,Yl N M60.pod.wrd t7T/TT'd 92089",L2) :01 :WOJA 22:TT 9002-92-d3S SEP-26-20pIS 10:45 From: .. Ju`+-1© 11:16A Grcmn t avRayAraa -a/-1* ...If ; Av! , stnue To; 010 P.3'13 4gn 727 446 0663 P.02 *N?? I r'ir;e rr 4R4el4?1 i i? a ?. W ftb SAN AM OURCMAU TM Avesplam re ewQTv M >? T ail +? a Al lYfrCMA6? M t 4 d arle??rrn?lw??sw?i! ?i?+M?a.flbr,ri¦iia?????.l?sl??; z. IIRJM s.M-101ftlull i b MllidoM ate R m pans mow. ores ! @faOW L Z Psw re ?••r¦. it 7>ioRa?tl wr oe? to ft me of 01? WAM 7w .AA= pi?ep?,agq t p.fk s. rnlol?r, ?- b. ?s?Kf? aM a¦?MMy??4wk?6M?fuw+i"'*1rR'??ft &- ? ?r` ?? ?e?w;a rrs 11pML +4 ? am Iwo* SiRIIIIIIMI aw pw so 4w S. ? A swim 1w IV tl?.1 al?t?ilM6r?iN ??aM?ar4i?r?i w,nwm Dew (h MOOL Ak.."_ i ?:IM.ti '??O ?i?? wwlar Mr ? ?w.? ?w ? ? a ? at wlNrrl a+? !fir ?M???aai Na'1??yM?aMi?a??4 a, Ago" sit on 14M1 aNl'? ?, f e-M 4w,r i 1ftr ?Aat?? ?d1aw¦wiw ?? bT/2T"d 92089")-2):01 :woad 22:tiZ 9002-92-d3S SEP-26-ff096 10:45 From: • Jun-193105 11:16A Grva JYnI_ON-O6??i* X410 _ p WE To:0010 P. 4/13 ign 727 446 $603 P„03 127 9640 R1) :T{itp aims P.O= UPR%tE ISM t ?. aay?ao? f; ?AM?a?e laiM1 66044% lbalN1??w?if ? ftw ?I ? 4t MMla M 1AraM ? i? +???.?w.?4a?o?Mt??rMtr.?r,?+aa?r ? ?tt? ? wawMapRp??MMrw?buM awi 4L CLONM ??rW???r ? &l'%M ? ??1i? mow/ I?MiW1R'11W?'?o.a?r??+,?R??? ?'' w?r••rm??wwt?.err?wr ? a?? Syr ?a >"vrM Am am a I. I . U M?wM¦Lity ir?wMti¦II be Poo" by ?A? wMrwrr•t?ar: ???ri??M.?iilt?ew?M wrfW? ?•smsi?M s?r?rr tr.?i.?r: PIP r ?. lMup N??eNr wMw s.rswar /?14ri1r?;Jt??1?IMtw?ew?riMHgril?l?;wi w?a?ww? w?M?t1?rMrw?.t*..w,r?,?rq?a? IL MO?r ea.«. M?¦aw1??Iw? I I I I I bT/2t'd 92089",L2Z:01 :Woad t2:ZZ 9002-92-d3S SEP-26-20 6 10:45 From: TOA010 P.5'13 u Jk'M-10-05 11:17A GrmatmrEkayAv-uaSlgn 727 446 8603 P.04 aluri.0b?0 1?eA?P aa? ?i 1'11 7fA>e!1li ?" MW3 ?t111l?fS? ?. a411o4! i if. ? ?? ?'??R +?¦? 1t ?1?1?1 is +?? ? +? w?h a ? ?4 *q #? ?r« M ?1iMrs ? ?yriu. N 3 bZ/bT'd 92089bbL2L:01 :woad b2:ZZ 9002-92-d3S 5EP-26-2-'0y6 10:45 From: PURCHi 4 IIIS PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEME Whitehurat Csener-), and Pankaj Passel rk oonsideratidn of the mutol C*vanartts and ti. t P+ar+sa anq :uIa3. Suttject to the I convoy to Buyer, and Buyer hereby collectively called the VropeR - To= 4010 P.6/13 .AND SALE AGREEMENT ?S Mandalay Avenuo )ntbr Beach, Ft_ 33767 ('Agreement") dated May 9, 2008 itl made WWeen Michael or assigns. herein C-Milined, Seller Ind Buyer agree at8 follows: AND SALE and conditions of thla Agreerent, Seller hereby agrees to sell and s to purchase from Seller, the fatllowing described proprfdy (17erein (a) L400 Located at 639 Mend4y Ave„ Clearwater Mach, PL 33767. Legal description is Mandalay Unlt No. 5 81k 84! hots t And 2 Yr w47, topether with alf rights, titles and interests, if any, of Setter in and to 0) all stripe or ditches, if any, lying adjacent to ttie foregoing bid of land, (i) Any and lying in or under the Lod of any eMeet or road, open or proposed, gii) all easements in, abutting or adjacent to the foreping had, and (iv) all other rights, privileges and appHrtenamees in any way relbW to or benefiting the foregoing tract (the Land': , (b) IrMM202. All Improvements, buildings anQ gbu tur0r. 0114 'Improvements') located in and an the Land; (c) TApg1 le Personal a er . Alliaf sellers right tide and int t in all felons, equipment, machinery. systems, If any, locruted an or about the Lend and Improvernentk or used in the operation and mpinterwnce thetpaai. (the ' rangiWe Personal Properv); (d) Intangible Prr . All of "Intangible Pmpartyj, if any, i Personal Property or the u" use of w:P*ewalter, wastewa, capacity or other utility facilities commitments for, and letters a ourrontly LwW to the fullest iW msnypla and studies rat ng to (a) mitts. All easement6, If a ft title and interest In all intangible property (the Lining to the Land, the iMPMVema:nta, or the Tangibk aof, inrJoding, without limitation, sA present end future oweity, drainage, drainage capacity, water, water sting W the Land and Improvements; all resertrat ms of, ring any such use. whether or not the same are being available: alnvironrnental studies, plena, specifications, property; , benefiting the Land or the Impreveandnts, and (fl Ri h . All rights and 8PPu tenwvn pertalining to the foregoing, includi% any right, title, and Intt" I of Se%r In and to adjacent Streets, gp?ys; or ,iphrs a? way. 2. i , URCHASE PRICE ?'urdtase PrioePrice, ribs assigned pua>;tta4vaiup for 686 Mandalay Ave. shall be One.Milllon saint Nofloo Dollars ($1,NO,000.00). The purchase Qrico shall be paid and a9rssigned by Buyer to Seiler at the Clagin (1t6 adjusted by the provisions Of pereg?aph 6). The purchase is contingent upon the. Buyers woptan= of me Environmental Studies, Ill MONEY 3.7 test MQM Buyer shall deiiver i Cleatrwattltlr Florfda, t=screw Agent, ak N01100 Dnllara ($10,004.00) by die* Buy*eG written ragtification that Seller h 06Atnud capon rocdot of the dtedt by t1 account InAU06d by ate FDIC or attentg the United States, If Buyer does not Feasibility Period that Buyer agrees Sal et lnitipls t,T,Z-d Richat'da, Wilkey, Fite, 9lavghtera pMtesi S Ward,' P With of >;• lolly a@x+bcuted cArttraat the gum of Ten Thousand and gash (tha 'Earned tail4rrey') within tlvae (5) business days after executed thle contrad. This aantnad Is ra;,COgnized as a binding 68cmw agent. The deposit shay be held in an Interest bearing Iy a U.S. government T.bitl secured by the full faith andl credit of rovide Seiler written "Cc on or before the expiration of the M'MW with this Agreement, the Earnest Money '*Shall be ??' ? Ppg? 1 of R - Buyer Irtitinly 92089b7L2L ; 01 : W oJ4 RP : T. T. qR P-qa -,4qq I 0 SEP-26-20eS 10:50 From: To:4405010 P,7/13 immadletely returned to Buyer, and no warty shall have any further obligations under this Agreement. If the sale of the Property is consummated pursuant to the (cem of this Agreement, the Earnest Mang shall be paid to 8011or And applied to thin pelym 't of the Purchase Prioe, If Buyer notifies Seller that Buyir elects to proceed beyond the Feasibility Perioduyer shell make a seoand deposit in the sum of Forty Thousand and No/1100 Dollar* ($40,00IAOWD) by cok. Both deposits shall be norr"rofundabie except for certain conditions identified elstvrhere in this Ca??tract. r I; 4. CONDITIONS TO CLOSING Ili following pry visiom are wnditions precvdonL'b closing the purnhow of the property. Seller's Obligations_ Seller 011811 deliver to Buyer, at $Wier's expense, within thirty (30) days dfter the date hereof, the following: I (+0) Title Commitment. Commitment for jritie Insurance for an Att& Form B owner's TW* Policy [8S d4fined in SecIllon 6,20)) iss+,ied by Richards Gilkey as Agents for Conmlonweaflh Tru6 Company, and legible copiers of an'' r0s1rt4tive covenants, 000rnents, 9Ad oftr items listed as title exceptions therein: and (b) gy_rYM. A current (within go days bdosing) as-buill survey of the Property (the "Survey"), prep0rtad by a Goensod surveyor :acceptable to thta Buyoe, prepared and contoining e certifration acceptable to Btrytlr arid Buyers lender, In the event the metes and bound9 description of the Land shalt differ the e0ecription oortteined in Exhibit "A" attached, the motes and bounds description of'*0 Survey shall replace Exhibit"A" and shell be th9 description used in the closing dpw wits. (e) Environmental $ Mies. ies. Seller she I provide to Suyer at Sellaell ®xpanse an t hvironmentet study. Environmental study must I?be aoceptalble to Buyer and Buyer's lender in it's sole discretion prior to the 9xpfration of th6 feasibility study. Iitte_Aanrovel. Buyer shall give Seller I Study Period (as defrrwd btalow) or the Title Commftmard onr lading copies of ti as set forth in the Title Commitment an Any title exceptions which are set forth pieced an the Properly by S61ler after thftten notice an or before the later of the expiration of the Feasibility not object within tho Title Approval Pt Sellers title (the "Permitted Exeeptlons' Approval Period, Seller shall cure such event that Seller falls to cure such oUJa rights or rem9dies available to quyer t Earnest Money Or dose this stala subim Purchase price in an amount agreed to fO e"rig, Seller shall cure all objeWon i piration of ttttean (16) days after Buyers receipt of the last of the title Insstntmonta) and the Survey in the event the Condition of IN of Survey Is not satisfactory to Buyer (the "TIUe Approval P060e). W1 the Title Commitment and/or the Survey to which the Buyoe delis act shalt be deemed to be permitted exeepWns to the I status of I With regard to Items to which Buyer does object within the Pills boftrs on or bOW6 the Closing bate (as dafined hen), lh t* lone Ott or before the Closing Date, Buyer In addition to any other der this Agreement, may cancel this Agreement and recover the to suds obio nWomble title ri( tOrs and receive a credit against the j Buyer and saner to cure aucn title matters. Notwithstanding tho that are liana argelnst the Prpperty and al) encumbrances that are dato of this Agreoment, Ep9bllihi Study. Buyer or suyees ag?.nts Grid Qorttr8CtoM may inaped the prop" and all financial records pertaining to ft property at any euonable time during ausinees hours within Ninety (90) days (the "Featibillty Study Pedodj from the dato of this Agreement. If Buyer ddtermines that the Property is acceptable, Buyer shall glvq Written nbt dbation of such ao4eptanoe to Sollrar prior to the expiration of the Feasibility Study Period and the Earnest Money Depoalt Chan then be non-refundable. In the event Buyer does not give ouch notift.0on to Seder I writing allay to the expiration of the Feasibility Sbrtfy Pt;riOd, the a:91d Inapectlon of the Property shall b6 deemed unsatisfsopry and the Eeriest Money bepositl shall be roturrted to Buyer, Buyer erleo agrees to indemnify and hold Seller harmless from and against any and all liability, claims, damagexe, causes of sctian. costs and exPWSW fh8t "Ier may Incur or suffer arisi from Of directly related to Buyers Wapeation azid testino of the Prop" hetbtlfMet. to the extent not c6used by the Seller's negllgbnce or willful mlswr4C , Seller shell have Onbrmed all 6nvironrnental studies Within sixty (80) days end shall oomect any and 611 srivlronmerttal deflects It any prior to the expiration of the ninety (90) day f6aslblilty period. ! I I I NO 2 of a Inttlals t;,T / 2 ' d 92089",L2L : 01 yCr nd,a s :woad 02:Tti 9002-92-d9S SEP-26-2006 4. 4.5 5. iO:SO From. • Tot *010 P19/13 I? t&llers-Performance. Ular shall havei perforn*d, observed and cornpOed with all of the covenants, agreements and conditionp required by th Agrrnw wt prior to or aisof the ClM1Ag. Sa let's Reaamentertlona, The represent4oou and warranties of Seller shall be true and correct on and as of the Closing Date whh the same foros e d efl-oct as if such repreaentetiori* And wwtrranties had begin made on and as of the Closing Data. Sellars;. by having dosed the sale of ttta Property, ghall beIdeemed conclusively to tme cer$W at CkwMg ttj; t all repmentAtlpns arW wafmritl" were bm and cwroi t on and as of the Closing Date, and such rep tatIons and warranties shall rurvive closing. I` fi Adyme-CondlUon- 5Vyer 811e11 not be obloted to perform under this Agreement if (a) there is aj material adverse change in the condition or operation of the Property prior to the Closing: (b) the physical condition of the Property on tho d6y of Closing shall t5e substantially different from the condition existing on the gate of this A?trewrnent; or (c) any pfteWing shall be pending which would involve the change, redeNgnation, mdeflnltlon or other modiflaWon elf any Pse, building or environmental restdgions or rode requirements appgcable to the Property (d) Any morato dum or suspension of Building Permits exists, 5. REPRESEN TAMNS Rg r nta g yf Salter. Seller wmrant>s: to Buyer that: r1 (a) Seller has and will convey good land Indefeasible fee simple title to the Property, free and dear of any liens or encumbrano6 eoept for the Pemtitted Ex69plions, and has authority to contract and consummate the ele pontenosted hereby without the joinder of any other (b) Thero are no legal actions or sultb pending or, to Sellars knowledge, with respect to the Property and Seller Is not awato 6r any facts which might result In any BUCK actions. Ili (c) Yo the best of SelWa knowledgb. no portlar? of the Property is affected by any special asaessrrtent5. ?I (d) To the best of Seller's k ?. nowtod90; at the time of Closing the Property sftatl have full, free and uninterrupted access to erect from all streets and rights of way adjacent to the Property. and Seller ha no krwyMedge of any 40 or eondhlon which would resutt in the termination or impslrnwrrt of such mess; (e) lyre are no partiaa in possesb) n of ally portion of the Property as lessees, I?certttees, tenants gat sufferance or, to the best of Sellers knowledge, trespassers, Except as noted in sedon 9.15 (f) Seller has Complied wish ell epptpi ,gb16 lAws, ordinances, and restrictions pertalnlnq to or affe dng the Property, Perfornlsnoe of this Agreement will not result irh any bnurch of, or oonatlb.rte any default under, or r"uh in the Imposition of any liars or enrumbrmw upon the Property under any aWftds&t or other instrument to which Seller is w party or by which Seller or the Property might be bound, (g) To the best of Sellem knowied e, #m 16 no pending, uontemptated, or threatened condemnation Dr similar pnsceedir,. effecting the Property. (h) 1=x(ept as expressly mentioned in?this Agrwm6nt or as may be imposed by the Pemtltted Ex04ptiona, there OM r* agteenterrts to which Seller is a party SWIM the Property, and . Seller will enter into no agreenrr nts effeding the Property without the prior written approval of Buyer. Except for Tannsmt LeaW grnd the right to continue to Lease the property to Tonnsnr* per section 15 (} Seller has paid all related propel;y taxes (through the immediately preoWing year) and any other fees and asseaamsnte a including any submerged daM lease fwes due and of allegedly dace. G) Neither Stiller near, to Sellers knowledge, any of Sellers predecessors within the past five years h6s claimed the tr$lttt(it o any taw permitting a special use valuation (such as "agricultural" or "open spaot j for the purpose of obtaining an ad valorem isy rate lower than the normal rate, or, If Seiler ? or Seller's predecessors have claimed such banefh, ? i'ago ? of A Sella I l lmillah 04M WtiarA... t7T/t;,'d 92099")-2) :ol :w° jd Oz:tiZ 9002-92-d3S SEP-c6- I 10:50 From: To:4 010 I; i Seller shall be responsible fOri the payment of any additional or "roll I&^ taxes in sooord2nee with Section 6.4(b)I i ow- W Seller is not a "Nrelgn person i as that term is used and defined in the Internal ROvdnue Code, Section 1446, os the via may be amondod. Seiler also agrees that User as transferor will indemnify Buyer ?.s transferee and agrees to hold Buyer harmlen front any liability or cost which Dwyer n ay, incur ftc a resat oC (i)Ihaa Seller's failure to pay Qtly U.S. federal inconm tax which Settled is requlrcpd to pay under applicable U. S. laver, or (n) any false or misleading atatwwent [nod In the nurvIbreign affidavit. (1) Seller has dice Wed to the Buyer in writing all facts that m4Wally and adversely affect dw property, ?' !i (m) 't'he Property has not been tha?,51te of any activity that would violate any past or prasarit ordinances, ruloc, regulations or, Iawe of any federal, state or loml govommento) body or agency tnWuding without Iimltietlon any environmental low. No hazaardous, toxic or infectious substances, materials or wastes, and no solid mwasta, toxic chernicals'< or any other onvIronmental oontaminall6e have been handled, stored, trealftd or disposed of on the Propdny, nor is any pas I of the Proparty affeded by COACdaliina:<tion from such subatanw, woom. chemicalGi or contaminates. There is no naturally occurring dr accelerator produced ra1iosc?opa material on the Property that would result in annuaal doses above nomad baadcgrawrmlt rsdiadon, (n) It Is the Buyer's responOllity tb assure that there is a Wquma property wastewater and wastewater capo*, drainagd end deoirm 9e capacity, and water, electric, gars utility eonveypnce for a multi family resldprt al project. (o) The Property does not CctrmtAlnl any easements, whidt may travsrse the Property, other then those easements ape toot for?ih in the title commitment. (p) Seller Qmvey$ all Mineral rightr-:4nd surtbm cadrttrol, which they currently own Aateemetts of $bNer. From tltpi dote of this Agreement until the Closing, V* Seller shall: II (a) Not allow the Property to be us6d in any manner Inoordlatent with applicable ordina3ncas or laws, or used in any manner cthat would violate any past or present ordinance or laves of any agency, indudirg without Milli ttlon any environmental law. Seller shall not allow any hnardoos or environmentally ! Stftitive material to be handled, stored, tnulted, or disposed of on the Property. [? I (b) Insure that e!I fiscal Matters arising from and of the Property have been paid as they become due. No psymerds for votk and materials shrill be unpaid that appid provide the basis for any lien a pinat the Property. (c) Permit the B I{ vyer and any Buyers rm:prowrrtatlvei to enter upon the Property to investigate the aandWon of Ume J?Property, Including wlthvut firnitati m in order to conduct inspections, make analysis, tm?Icore drillings and/or other Intrusive samPle% to Conduct, any environmental site assoearnent, and to perform such ac=tivities as the Buyer may; dthbm appropriate. (d) Immediately notify the Buyer o zany materiel change in respect of the Property and Mal condition or any information famished to the Buyer in respect of the Property, induclingj without limitation any dMnge tha would affetot this Agreement. (e) Advise the Buyer of any legal IIr aadministfativb hearing bofure any agency that could: affed the Property or its use. P. 9/13 (t) Not sail, assign, or convey any ? ght, title or interest to the Property, or allow any lien tai attach to the Property exert 1 y lien for ad valorem taxes, or allow any ma! estate! procedural modifieattoms aalfecti the Property or any pert thomof, without the Buyer's! prior written consent, (g) Permit the Buyer to pinoe a project sign on the property, I Page 4 or R Seller initials - Buyer &,iti&6 _ ,c QCfIS?QF? Jai : :WOJAia:ii 9002-92-d3S 4T 0 I ?I SEP-26-2006 is (i.1 6.2 10:50 From: 0 To :4010 P. 10'13 6) CLMINd lealn . Provided that all of the aantinbl Ol ndee of this Agreethent have been fulfilled (or waivQo in writing by Buyer) the Closing ("Closing") shall bblihald at the office of Richard's, dalkey, Fit*, Siaugtrter Ptabaat & Ward, P.A. on Novomber 9, 2005, urim the parties mutually agree upon another place, time ar data. Not withstanding Me above, Buyer shall N46 one (2) closing exterlsione of thirty (30) days each for an additional and non-rolund6ble deposit of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,ODO) for each extension. All depoa ta'shall apply toward the Purchase Price at doeing. li! Seligrs ObllaaWns at Qk*ma. At Clost I I 7, Seller Mail dviver to Buyer the followin>;f documents: (a) QW, Cameral Warranty U*. (the "beedl executed by Seller obnveying the Land and Improvements to Buyer W15111 Ito no exception O"t• than the Permitted Exception& I? (b) 111 f Sa!q. Bill of Sale ("Bill oll We") oxmied by Seller, containing covenants of genofW warranty, assigning to Buyer llh ? Tanglble Property and Intangible Prop". (o) Title F'°Iicy, owners rills Pot, In Florida standerd form (the "Owner's PoIW), naming 9uyer as Insured, in the a" ti of the Purchasae Price, insuring that Buyer owns good and indefeatiblo fee simple title to the Property acoonding to the title atanoiards adopted from tirne to fire by the ftrlda ?W, subject ordy to the Permitted Exceptions; with tt;e exception for discrepancies Ini! Area and boundaries being deleted to extent allowed 4y epplicabfe regulation: with the ItXwbon for aid valorem tano reflecting only taxes for V*;c OurroM year and subsequard oars, and subuquent assessments for print yearn due to change in land usage or ownkship, arm notated "not yet dug end payebta"; except !If reference is made In the Suriiey to a specined unrecorded exception shown on the Survey. Satisfy any payment$ due on the Submerged Land Lease to the We and assign "Me, II' (d) Foreign P2= An affldav(t cif Seder cartifying that Seller is net a 'foreign person," a? defined In the federal Fomign 1??v48trnent in Real Property Tax Act of 1geo, and the 1994 Tax Reform Act, as amended- (a) (0 (9) in Certificstas, Certificates &r all ad vraWrem taxes, fees, -i6w sments, and elmII6r ch" assessed agalnst the [Property indicating that they have been pold through the year prior to ills year of the Cling Date. Qggrnentary Stamps: ftridsj Documentary Stamps required on the instrument of conveyance and the cost of recording any corrective instnmterrts shall be oeid by rho self<,r. u ! III Other Documents. All other doc Title Company may reasonably erg OblioOlion at Closlnn. At Clo (8) P tagse Prtcg. The Pural available funds. (b) Other Dom. All other Company may reasonably n t that both the Seller's and Buyer$ Ottomoys or the to property consummate this sale, Buyer shall deliver to Seller the following. Price by cashiers Check or wire transfer of immediately wants that the Seller's and Buyer's Ottonteyb or the Title to property rarnuamrnata this eats, PromWn. All rents, all other amounts payable by the tenarb under that Leases, Income. and real est$te property taxes and other agaea¢ments with resppo to the Property for the year in which the Closing ooCUle, shall tae prorated to the Closing Date. Th4Ipravi:tiOn9 of this Se ctim 6.4 shell survive the Closing, (a) If the MOSS g shall occur before the tax rate or the ass4t $ed valuation of the property is furpd for the then current year, the apportionment of taxes shall be upon the basis of they tax rate for the P(> 0"ng year applied to the latest a3SOWM valuation. If the subsgquen! tax rate and the d3ag68ed vale of the Property differs from that at dosing, the parties' agree to adjust the proration of gg. If the Property is not assessed as a soparmo psmall for tax or assessment purppserr', then such taxes and asse's'sments attributeatale to thdl Sol er initials PW 5 of 8 -`- -- - DuYa Initaale 4,T I •`4 gSLAAqbb)P) :01 :wo,ad tiz:TT 9002-92-d9S • y1 • 5EP-x6°21 10;50 From: I To:4475010 P. 11/13 Property shall be do%rmined b bath Seller and Buyer, (b) In the event the Property has en assessed for property trtx purposes at such rate* 619 would result in 'roll-back" taxes upon the changes in land usage or ownership of ttio Property, Seller acgmee6 to pay 0?1 such taxes and iriftillnify and gave Buyer harmlem from and against any and all claims and liabilities for such tdxp6. I? Posmss;p Poss"rlon of the Property+ shall be delivered to Buyer at Closing, sugjed to the! Permitted Exceptions. I Closinn Gtrets. F_xce as gdWwise I.: pt tyxpressiy provided to*n, Ballet shall pay, on the Closirrgj Date, the title Insi.&tnee premiurn for the Owner's IPotiay with all endOrsaments, the Survey, Documentary Stamps on the creed and costa of any copies of the Pennitted Exceptions. Buyer shall pay, on the Ciosng Date, all nk;oricling costs. Except as otherwise provided herein, each party shall pay its owls attomeys' fees. (RISK OF LOSS II! fib(. Seller assumes all responsib?tKy fbr d4mage or injury occurring to the Property until the Closing has been consummated. If the Property 'er sny part thereof, sufhsre any diari- ge prior to the Closing, Buyer may either (a) terminate this Agreement and recover the Earnest Money or (b) corwrrimate rho Closing, In which latter overt all proceeds of any irisur&tnq covering such daml?e shell be assigned to Buyer at the Closing and the I ,rdhase Price strait be reduced by the amount of any applicable deductible or self- insurance penalty I nd t . If, prior to the Closing l lthere Is pending action to take any of the Property by emineht domain pmeeedingg or by deed in lieu 00reof, Buyer may either (it) tetminate thin Agreement and recover the Earnest Money or (b) con surnmate [the Closing, in which tatter event the award of the condemning authority shall be assigned to Buyer at itoe Ciosing, In the event of the latter option. Serer shall cause to be prepared a survey plat 0nd aeeompanylatg moires and bounds desMoun of the remaining pwtian of the Property, in the same form as preserlt>4d for the Survey, and the metes and bounds d@Wpdbrt shall be used in the teed and other dosing doeur?nts at the CWng. s. DEFAULT Breach tU &Ier. If Seller beaches thl . Agreement (except in the event that Buyer has defaulted) Buyer may either (a) terminate this Agreemaht?arlo thereupon shall be entitled to (i) the immediate return of the E9enest Money, and (u) a reirrfru Ifrtim the Seller of all of Buyers costs and expenses incurred by Buyer in connection with negotiating dnd lpreparing this Agreement, examinkV and irwoeGdrig the property, and prepartrig for Closing (rnciuding, i limitation. all rMonable attorneys' fees) or (b) enforce specific perfomtanec hereof, 05 Buyer's $ole WW i?aodusive remadle6 and relief hereunder- Breach WAVE, If Buyer tuMdWm iW 069atfpns et Closing, Seller shall be enticed to the Earnest Money as liquidated damages (and not sarf A penally) and as l`sellera sole rernedy and retlef twraunder. , MISCELLANEOUS Seller hereby agroes ftt eve (5) days . M the execution of this Purchase Agmernerit. he shed prWft Purr*ser with all surveys, Studies, ertglnerer)ng reportrs, bite pIW*, agreements, warnw tfaia and guaranties currently existing with reaped to all or dry part of the Subject Property. All raicm shall be in writing and stead be deemed effec om when personally delivered to the address of the party to roWve such notice set forth bury If effected by teieaVy, hand delivery, or by Fedewtl Ejit mw of sirtutr*r courier smrvbe, or, whether schAily reorsived or net, when depotlted in any post offiice or mail feWplaft regartarty maiMathed by fns Un rod SUMS C-0VW *nt, certified of registered mail, return receipt requested, postaga prVa3nid, addressed 91 Bows: Paw6of R fiouer Inhlgls 13uyor ltlitio .n !W0JJ as:TT Qflrl?-Qa- J?? SEP-2b- 10;51 From: LJ • To:4473M P.12/13 If to seller: Michael Whiltehurat 230 Wlrttward letand Cletirwater, FL 33767 Tel ! (737) 6112-3201 rl; If to Buyer: R. Carlton Word Richards, 0111key, Fito, Slaughter, Peat,*[ a. ward, p.A. 1263 Park Street C1e6rw2ter, FL 33766 701! (727) 443.3281 FatCI (727) 4474W4 Ernail: rwardarlott edhiigilkey.com Sf?ial1004 Cgrnmissiona. Seller shall at dosing to R6D Reol Estate SMiree a mrnm*16n of 6% of the total pu0e3e PdOe.. Heller shall Inatruct dosing aprit to fund gold commission in full at timelof closing. Neither Party hos contacted any other;! isat estate broker, finder or similar person in catnectlon with the transaction contemplated hereby, To the adual knowledge of either Party, no Other brokerage fees or commisskm have bben paid or era dro and owing to any other person other than to the Rogers Beach Development Real Estate Services, Seller and Buyer each Waby grow to indemnify and hold harmless the other from any claims for any Otharlbrokerage faes, eornmUons or similar charges with re'stisat to this transaction, arlskV by, through or under the indemnl" party and each further agrees to Indemnify and hold harmless the other from tiny losi or damage resulting ftm any inaccuracy In the raw stations contained in this Section 9.3. This inde?nlfication agreement by the parties shall survive the Ctot:ing, o. NMMent This Agreement em66dioa the entlla agreement between the patties. There tare no oral or written egreemerft between the parties. nor Qny representations made by either party relative to the subject matter hereof, which pre not exp'osgly get firth herein. An'?Atrhdrhent. 'chit} l Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument exeCuttad by the party or parties to be bound thonaby. 6T Ai -A 99'RR9b7J P.J : 0 1 go in The captions and headings used in this Agreement are for Oorwenief= only and do 'not in any way limit, tamplify, or oNterwise modify th " provisions of this Agreement. 9.7 Trine of §15M. Time is Af the eseen lef this Agreement. Any time perbd provided for in this Agreement that expires tan a Saturday, Sundby, or le 'al holiday shall extend to the next fuif business day. 9.D Qvriminp i.ew. This Afire nt chat) bEl I governed by the lows of the State of Florida and the lbws of the United $tstes pertaining to transactions if, t=lvrida. 9.fl ss n i ns_ Buyer moy lgn Buyer's rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Seiler at any time prior to the 61osing. B. O lnv Provision. If any provision of th reeme i present or future laws, such M IS held to W Illegal, invalid or unenforceable under provision shad be fully sevarable. 9.111 A ttomeys' Fees. In the event it hecorr.m necessiary for either party hereto to 1110 "it to enforoe this Agreement, the prevaling party in such auk shall be entltled to recover, in addition to all other remedies or damages, as provided, reasonable attom4ye' fees Incurs in such cult. 9.1? 9QWhgt ntera . This Agreement y be oxltcu in a number of Identical r ounterpsrte,l each of which for all purposes Is deemed an origt al, and all of which constitute collectively one (1) agreement: but in making proof of this Agreement, K shat not be necessary to produce or account for mare than one such counterpart. Seller Inwi* Pggt 7 of x -- - Buycr.lnlliuly :woa3 22:TT 9002-92-d3S SEP-26-2006 53.13 a.14 i 9!.15 0 10;S1 From: To:4475010 P. 13/13 iiRsprirtdpoishorenWarcremployws,ageft Non Cpete AOt-eren. The Seller lor representatives (a) will not initiate, encourage the initiIating by others of ctgomions or negotiations with third parties or rtspde,d to Wicitatbns by third parliosl'ilelaOng to the purchase of the Property in whole Or In part, (b) will immediately notify Buyer if any third party attempts to InitiAte any such sot OWtion, discussion or negotiating with Seller, and (c) will not enter Into agtieernant with rospect thereto with any third parly. Date Ibis Agreement. This Agreemejrbt ahall be null and vold unless Seller, no later than May 16, 2006, delivers throe (3) eWaWted c:oplos of 616 Agreement to Buyer at the address shown in Section 53.1 hereof. As used in this Agreement, the germs date of this Agreement' a 'date hereof or ldkj i ve date of this Agreement" shall mean and refor to th&i date (het the This Company issues its receipt for a fdlly executed counterpart of this Agreement and the lamest Money, TeVaM in Possession. Notwithstand?i i? g anything In the 6xmtrsct to the contrey, the subject imp" is currently leaW as residential apartm;4 Sellent5 shall continue the operation of the property as such until the dosing date including but not iimitedl to entering into and modifxaztion of rental agreements vAh current anftr proepAt`.tive tenants. Seller, re .reaents that all current rental agreements and any future rental agrmnents will contain a provision peiWtting the landlord to terminate the rental agre+ernent upon 30 days notic6, and shall provide Tenant Estopp?,ls from each Tenant evidencing the same, Exocuted on the dates shown below by.-I! Date of 68 inter 5 ), 1,9 1 Date iota unaersigneo Ttae company heret)y ac"4 agrees to hold and dispose of the Earneet Carlton ward 'cr Initiaks ------------- s receipt of the Eamerat Money and a copy of this Agreement, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. ' Page R u r K Buyer hutiuls • Illfl .l J (`? ? T T •?QG1G17-Q?-.J?? %t°"k. 9/26/2006 Receipt #: 1200600000000009803 12:19:38PM Date: 09/26/2006 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-09053 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid W 0 Check PANKAJPATEL R_D 1015 In Person Payment Total: 1,205.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 $1,205.00 cReceipt.rpt • • FLD2006-09053 635 MANDALAY AVE TIFFANY TERRACE PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 258A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 09/26/2006 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC : CDB: CLWCoverSheet 6 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLEAVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 5624567 FAx (727) 5624865 March 18, 2009 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services, Inc. PO Box 4948 Clearwater, FL 33758-4848 RE: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: On March 17, 2009, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on the parcel at 635 Mandalay Avenue shall be submitted by February 20, 2010. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above refferenced case you will heed to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the o requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michae elf , Planning Director S. (Planning Department IC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications Mandalay 0635 Tiffany Terrace (7) 2007.02 - Approved - WWIMandalay 635 CDB Time Extension Development Order 3.18.09.doc 0 nr. ---- ?---------- -- "---..__ ... _.. 1 u 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 5:38 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - As a reminder, the Time Extension for the above referenced application is on the CDB agenda on Tuesday, March 17, 2009, starting at 1:00 pm in City Council chambers at City Hall, 112 S. Osceola Avenue. It has been placed on the consent portion of the agenda. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 • Wells, Wayne C Page 1 of 1 From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:51 PM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Extension Requests - Highland/Nursery Rd (Belleair Manor Townhomes and Shops) and Mandalay Avenue (Tiffany Terrace) Agreed. I have no desire for these projects to be denied either. Thanks, Renee. -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:41 PM To: Tefft, Robert Subject: Extension Requests - Highland/Nursery Rd (Belleair Manor Townhomes and Shops) and Mandalay Avenue (Tiffany Terrace) Good afternoon Robert, As long as we will have a time period to submit for permit in the event the CDB denies the extension requests, we have no problem being heard at the March CBD meeting; hopefully they will not deny the request and it will not be an issue. Thank you, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. m 727 443 2869 to 727 446 8036 (c) 727 235 8475 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33756 2/2/2009 C? ?9 5uweu ??. January 26, 2009 Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 635 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Delk: Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports Re-Zoning, Land Use, Annexation o r anagement tility Design D v U V n Traffic ConsffuktioriAl lministration im 2 9 PLANNING & DEVELiOPMEW SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER On February 20, 2007 the Community Development Board approved the above application for Flexible Development to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. On January 7, 2008 a one year extension was approved to submit an application for a building permit with an expiration date of February 20, 2009. Due to the economic issues currently being experienced, the development team has determined that it is still not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. It is our hope that within the next eight to twelve months the economy will begin to turn around. We offer our assurance that the development team has worked diligently to move this project forward; the architectural plans have been completed and we are ready to submit once the economy is more stable. Please accept this letter as our formal request for an additional one year extension to apply for construction permits for the Flexible Standard Development approval. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me; we understand this extension may require review and approval by the Community Development Board. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request. Res ectfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Cc: NES File #639 D. Williams PO. Box 4948 Clearwater, FL 33758-4948 tech@northsideengineering.com 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 • Pagel of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 9:38 AM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair Manor Shops I've spoken with Renee with regard to both of the extension requests she has submitted. She doesn't feel that there would be any problem with them going forward on the March agenda, but will speak with her clients to let them decide. I should hear back from her sometime this afternoon. -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:29 PM To: Tefft, Robert Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 Belleair Manor Shops - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and FYI. Please check with Renee and confirm that the "applicant" agrees. We'll then schedule for the March CDB. Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:17 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - Belleair Manor Shops 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and FYI. She raises a good point re applicant agreement... -----Original Message----- From: Gina Grimes [mailto:GGrimes@hwhlaw.com] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:40 PM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: RE: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - Manor Shops 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair I think its OK if both agree. Furthermore, the Code only requires that the CDB "receive" the request within the 1 year extension period granted by the Community Development Director. The facts could be construed such that the CDB "received" the request when the request was filed with the Planning Dept., but does not need to act upon it until their next meeting. 1/30/2009 0 9 Page 2 of 3 From: Leslie.DougalI-Sides@myClearwater.com [mailto:Leslie.Dougall-Sides@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 8:43 AM To: Gina Grimes Subject: FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair Manor Shops Gina, is it acceptable to you to postpone hearing until March if the applicant and City agree? -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:13 PM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 Belleair Manor Shops - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Leslie - FYI. What do I do with a request for extension of time from the CDB which is received in an otherwise timely manner, but due to a cancellation of the February meeting, may not not be heard until after the codified deadline for consideration? I would certainly like to avoid a meeting for this sole purpose. Could the canceled meeting be considered an extenuating circumstance and have the CDB take action in March? What are your thoughts? Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:20 PM To: Delk, Michael; Tefft, Robert Subject: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair Manor Shops Good afternoon Mr. Delk and Mr. Tefft, Attached above please find a letter requesting an additional extension for the above referenced project, the original letter will follow in the mail for your records and file. Thank you and please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information. Best Regards, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner 1/30/2009 • Page 3 of 3 NorthSide Engineering Services, Inc. (v) 727 443 2869 (0 727 446 8036 (c) 727 235 8475 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33756 1/30/2009 Page 1 of 3 • Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:54 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: A04-01420: FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair Manor Shops IbINumAttach: 1 MessageGUID: {13DBA221-1ED7-4730-9FE3-1212199D77C3} OriginalDate: None Originator: SQL Style: Planning General miscellaneous FYI - the time extensions can go on the March agenda. -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:49 AM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: A04-01420 : FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair Manor Shops Ok. Thanks. We'll put them on the March agenda for the CDB's action. mid Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:22 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: A04-01420 : FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair Manor Shops I haven't received a response yet on this. I have no problem with placing the matter on the March agenda due to the extenuating circumstance of there being no February meeting. -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 8:43 AM To: 'ggrimes@hwhlaw.com' Subject: FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair Manor Shops 1/30/2009 • • Page 2 of 3 Gina, is it acceptable to you to postpone hearing until March if the applicant and City agree? -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:13 PM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: FW: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 Belleair Manor Shops - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Leslie - FYI. What do I do with a request for extension of time from the CDB which is received in an otherwise timely manner, but due to a cancellation of the February meeting, may not not be heard until after the codified deadline for consideration? I would certainly like to avoid a meeting for this sole purpose. Could the canceled meeting be considered an extenuating circumstance and have the CDB take action in March? What are your thoughts? Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:20 PM To: Delk, Michael; Tefft, Robert Subject: FLD2006-06036 and PTL2007-00001 - 1515 S. Highland Avenue - Belleair Manor and Belleair Manor Shops Good afternoon Mr. Delk and Mr. Tefft, Attached above please find a letter requesting an additional extension for the above referenced project, the original letter will follow in the mail for your records and file. Thank you and please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information. Best Regards, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (v) 727 443 2869 (>) 727 446 8036 (c) 727 235 8475 1/30/2009 e - • Page 3 of 3 • 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33756 1/30/2009 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Renee Ruggiero [renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 10:02 AM To: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - 635 Mandalay Avenue - Tiffany Terrace Good morning Mr. Delk and Mr. Wells, Please see the attached letter requesting an additional extension for the above referenced project and Development Order; the original letter will be mailed to you today for your records. Thank you and please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information, we will respond immediately. Best Regards, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (v) 727 443 2869 (n 727 446 8036 (c) 727 235 8475 300 South Belcher :Road Clearwater. FL 33756 1/30/2009 Civil Land Planning orthsme Due Diligence Reports Re-Zoning, Land Use, Annexation 'ewe f S - Stormwater Management Utility Design January 26, 2009 Traffic Construction Administration Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 635 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Delk: On February 20, 2007 the Community Development Board approved the above application for Flexible Development to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. On January 7, 2008 a one year extension was approved to submit an application for a building permit with an expiration date of February 20, 2009. Due to the economic issues currently being experienced, the development team has determined that it is still not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. It is our hope that within the next eight to twelve months the economy will begin to turn around. We offer our assurance that the development team has worked diligently to move this project forward; the architectural plans have been completed and we are ready to submit once the economy is more stable. Please accept this letter as our formal request for an additional one year extension to apply for construction permits for the Flexible Standard Development approval. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me; we understand this extension may require review and approval by the Community Development Board. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request. Respectfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Cc: NES File #639 D. Williams P.O. Box 4948 Clearwater FL 33758-4948 tech@northsideengineering.com 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 6 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 2:00 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Attached is a Time Extension Development Order for the above referenced project. The original is being mailed to you. Wayne T' ` 1 Mandalay 635 me Ext. Dev. Or 011 A (0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLoRIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services Inc. PO Box 4948 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4848 RE: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: January 7, 2008 On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (February 20, 2008). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On January 2, 2008, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of market changes, which has an impact on the interior design and the completion of construction drawings. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, APPROVE a one-year time extension to February 20, 2009, to submit an application for building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 635 Mandalay Avenue. 0 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" V-1 . January 7, 2008 Ruggiero - Page 2 In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall, be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on th(: project is being made and whether or not there are additional pendir.g or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael e , A Planning T)irantnr S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) Un active or Finished Applications Mandalay 0635 Tiffany Terrace (T) - ApprovedlMandalay 635 Time Ext. Dev. Order 1.7.08.doc NorlhSiee • SIur.COUwg $m4w. 109C. December 27, 2007 Community Development Board c/o Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053 and TDR2006-09031 635 Mandalay Avenue CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL ---------- 77-"N?\ I s JAN - 2 Luu i pLANNINU €. QEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER Dear Mr. Delk: We would like to formally request an extension to the Development Order issued for the above referenced property. On February 20, 2007 the Community Development Board reviewed and approved our request for Flexible Development approval and Transfer of Development Rights; the Development Order dated February 21, 2007 provided a deadline of February 20, 2008 to apply for construction permits. Due to the extreme downward turn in the condominium market within Florida, the development team has determined that it is not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. It is our hope that within the next eight to twelve months the market will begin to turn around. The architect and the mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineers are making the final adjustments to the design for the interior of the building. We offer our assurance that the entire development team is working diligently to move this project forward and will be ready to spring into action once the market is a little more stable. We look forward to the completion of this development project which will meet the architectural standards of the City of Clearwater and the requirements of Beach by Design. Please accept this letter as our formal request for an extension of one year and to place this request on the next available CBD agenda for consideration if required. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request; we look forward to receiving confirmation of the hearing date once available if a hearing is required. ctfully, i Renee Ruggiero, Project er Cc: NES File #639 N. Pelzer PO BOX 4948 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4948 TECH@NORTHSIDEENCINEERINC.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 C ITY OF C LEA WATER ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OrricE: Box 4748, CLE:ARV?1'fER FLORIDn 33758-4748 +. j r r f MUNICIPAL. SERVICI?s Bull-DING, 100 SOU-fH MYRi-u, AVIi\UG, CLF?ARWAT'rlt, FI.oRIDA 33756 RLEPEIONr (727) 562-4567 FAX (7271562-4865 LONG RANGE, PLANNING DEVELOPMENT RI•;VIrW February 21, 2007 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Cases FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 635 Mandalay Avenue Dear Ms. Ruggiero: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the. Community Development Code. On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The subject 0.28 acres is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way; 2. The site is currently vacant; 3. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 4. The proposal is for the construction of a mixed-use building of eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area, in compliance with the vision in Beach by Design for this area; 5. The retail floor area has been designed for two retail units facing Mandalay Avenue at a three-foot front setback in compliance with the requirements of the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design; 6. The proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; FR,vNK I I11MARU, MA OR )IFN DORAN, C(A NUTAIENIIII-a (Im-r ILwIl.n)) ., (3n;. jc;x>c , Ccn ncu. unuse; G\1"1.[:_\ A. 1'P1IRSEf:, O NC AIFNI]WR "I"(dHAL EMITOYMEN f AND AI'1'iRMATM: ACEION ;,\II'LM Fl," • • :r February 21, 2007 Ruggiero - Page Two 7. The proposed building height is 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The applicant proposes 18 parking spaces on-site, including one handicap space, to accommodate the eight residential units in the building at two parking spaces per unit and one space each for the owners/operators of the retail units; 9. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 22 spaces (six spaces for retail sales; 16 spaces for attached dwellings) to 18 spaces; 10. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted providing the justification for the parking reduction; 11. The proposal includes the construction of 11 new angled parking spaces within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way in front of the subject site, increasing the overall number of parking spaces available to the surrounding businesses and dwellings; 12. The proposed building meets the setback and stepback requirements of the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design; 13. The proposal includes the elimination of the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue at least where the stairwell is located and the reduction of the foundation landscaping to three feet in front of the retail units, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria; and 14. That there are no active Code Enforcement cases for this property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 689 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 689 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (689 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That the new parking spaces and landscape island within Mandalay Avenue meet the following requirements: a. the applicant construct the improvements at their expense; b. signage be erected by the City limiting the time for parking within these spaces; c. a 30-foot curb radius be provided on the landscape island; i February 21, 2007 Ruggiero - Page Three d. prior to the issuance of any permits, a right-of-way use permit be required, which will include approval of landscaping within the landscape island acceptable to the City Engineer; e. the landscape island include shrubbery to fill the island and one cabbage palm, where shrubbery be maintained at a height not to exceed 30-inches; and f. the landscape island be provided with irrigation; 6. That all dumpsters be enclosed within trash rooms or screened trash areas, including those for the commercial units, acceptable to the Planning and Solid Waste Departments, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 7. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the Royal Way right-of-way shall be installed for the site frontage prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 9. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be monument-style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a final determination be made regarding the existing monitoring wells, acceptable to the Environmental Engineering and Planning Departments; 11 That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, air conditioning units be screened from view from public streets or adjacent properties; 12. That, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant provide copies of the condominium documents designating the southernmost parking space on either side of the drive aisle for the owners/operators of the retail units; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (February 20, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending 0 0 f February 21, 2007 Ruggiero - Page Four the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on March 7, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. Sincerely, Mic aD , A Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslMandalay 0635 Tiffany Terrace (7) - ApprovedlMandalay 635 Development Order 2.21.07.doc • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:34 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Attached is the Memorandum I am sending to the CDB correcting Condition #5.f. Wayne rlFn? TNI Memorandum to CDB re changed C... 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:20 AM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case. Please let me know by 3:00 pm on Friday, February 16, 2007, as to whether the conditions of approval are acceptable or not. We still have this "issue" with an affected property owner asking for a continuance on this case (which means it cannot be on the Consent Agenda). This case will be heard by the CDB on February 20, 2007, at 1:00 pm at City Hall. Wayne Mandalay 635 Staff Report.doc 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:31 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: CDB Hearing FYI -=---Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:03 PM To: 'Mucsrus7@aol.com' Cc: wwaldow@rochester.rr.com Subject: RE: CDB Hearing Mr. McCullough - Please check with Mr. Waldow and let me know. If you went to all (or some) of the Old Florida District meetings where a new plan for this area was developed and eventually adopted by City Council (Plan), the proposal is in compliance with those guidelines/rules for the Old Florida District. The Plan desired mixed use along Mandalay Avenue at a zero setback, with stepbacks on the building and parking accessed from the rear or the side street. The proposed site plan and building elevations comply with these guidelines/rules. The request is structured to how the Zoning District, which is general to City-wide application, sets out setbacks, etc. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Mucsrus7@aol.com [mailto:Mucsrus7@aol.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:22 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: wwaldow@rochester.rr.com Subject: Re: CDB Hearing t Thank you for clarifying the location,as for some reason we were thinking it was on the west side. My mistake. I will talk with Mr. Waldow about this and get back to you asap. I am still concerned about the number of variances requested. Why did we all go through Old Florida District development guidelines if they in essence are meaningless? That would be my main concern now. Jim McCullough 2/12/2007 4L Northside EV&eovof Seu*a, logic. CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: January 23, 2007 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Tiffany Terrace - FLD2006-09053 NES Proj# 639 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 1 Response to Fire Comment Letter 1 Email Correspondence from W. Wells to R. Ruggiero 15 Sheet C3.1, 1 Signed and Sealed Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: 'W* 4- rA00 ?*p &9) Renee Rug ro, Project lane Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams ORIGINAL RECFlvFr ? ?? ?)) 1 nr.nr PLANNINGCITY OF CLLEARWATER i 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECHCa NORTHSIDEEN+GINEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 Horthshre ? January 19, 2007 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Ave - Tiffany Terrace - Response to Additional Comments Dear Mr. Wells: CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL Listed below is the civil response to the outstanding comments provided by you via e-mail on January 18, 2007. The architect will conduct the necessary actions related to the exits listed within item number 2 of your e-mail. Fire Department Comments Due 1/24/2007 1. The Civil Sheet C3.1 has been revised to provide and indicate a 15' setback for the Fire Department Connection from the building. The new hydrant at the north end of the building has been labeled. Should you have additional questions or concerns relating to this response letter or the revised plans, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for providing the opportunity to respond to these outstanding comments. S* erely, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner Tiffany Terrace #639 635 Mandalay Ave ORIGINAL RFCFI1XP PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFR 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARW ATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH@NORTH IDEENGINEERINC.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 1 Renee Ruggiero From: Wayne.Wells@myCiearwater.com Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2007 2:10 PM To: Renee Ruggiero Cc: James.Keller@myCleaiwater.com Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Attachments: Mandalay 635 CDB Letter.doc °I Mandalay 635 CDB Letter.doc (2... Renee - I am placing this case on the February 20, 2007, CUB agenda (see attached letter - original letter being mailed). However, I still need for you to address the following comments with revised plans (#1 below) and letter/email (42 below) by Wednesday, January 24, 2007: Fire Department: 1. Plan has the Fire Department Connection too close to the building, must be 15' off of the building bringing it closer to Mandalay. The existing fire hydrant can be used for the Fire Department Connection and the second Fire Hydrant being added can be placed at the north end of this project. Revise PRIOR TO CDB 12/15/2006 Revised plan shows the Fire Department Connection off of the building but the hydrant is NOT marked on the north end of the building as additional fire hydrant.(JFK) 1/16/2 t7 Revised plan did not address this comment, second Fire Hydrant is not marked. (JFK) C3.1 2. Exits do not go directly to a public way. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 12/15/2006 Will be addressed when building plans are submitted. (JFK) 1/16/2007 Revised plan did not address this.(JFK) Wayne <<Mandalay 635 CDB Letter.doc>> No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.14/636 - Release Dater 1/18/2007 i • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 1:36 PM To: Rickard, Leonard; Keller, James; Wells, Wayne; Renee Ruggiero Cc: Roland Rogers; Danny Patel; ShivRBD@aol.com; Edward Smeltz Subject: Tiffany Terrace Exit Stair letter Lenny! Thank you for your guidance and Collaboration! Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, F134698 (727)733-3769 See attached file(s) 1/23/2007 wl • 0 Abbb. IIIIII ,Patti Vie ZIrLiJitect, Int. January 23, 2007 Chief Leonard Rickard James Keller City of Clearwater Fie Administration VIA FAX RE: Tiffany Terrace 635 Mandalay Ave Dear Jim and Lenny, Thank you so much for you guidance and clarification on the NFPA Requirement that 50% of the Exit egress stairs shall terminate directly into a Public Way. It is our Understanding that we shall comply with Florida Fire Protection Code, NFPA 2004, any modifications to the stair exit requirement will not effect wither the building footprint or the Elevations as a re going forward for consideration by the Community Development Review Board scheduled for February 20tH Should you have any questions or need further information do not hesitate to call. PMSlaws 1634 SAN Roy DRIVE • DUNEDIN, FL 34698 727-733-3769 • AA 0002103 • parch@gate.net rauiua ivi. OLUU!j11 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:28 PM To: Keller, James; Wells, Wayne Cc: Renee Ruggiero Subject: Tiffany Terrace Hi James, Per our conversation on Friday, January 19th, I offer to you the following information: Yes the address is 635 Mandalay.. One of the exits for the building shall exit into a public ROW, per the code that you were to send to me. Thought you contacted Wayne Wells to verify that this requirement will be met... Lenny Richards called today... Hopefully someone is giving me chapter and verse... Thank You! Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FI 34698 (727)733-3769 1/23/2007 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 10:05 AM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Jim Keller is not requesting such. However, Patti does need to look at this from a Building/Fire Code standpoint and if it requires major change to this area (and how it relates to other site improvements), it may be advisable to know now rather than later. -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [maiIto: Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:35 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Wayne, I would like to confirm that even if Patti needs to relocate/move/change a door to address this, you are NOT requiring a revised plan reflecting such information prior to CDB. Is that correct .....? -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:10 PM To: Renee Ruggiero Cc: James. Keller@myClearwater.com Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - I am placing this case on the February 20, 2007, CDB agenda (see attached letter - original letter being mailed). However, I still need for you to address the following comments with revised plans (#1 below) and letter/email (#2 below) by Wednesday, January 24, 2007: Fire Department: 1. Plan has the Fire Department Connection too close to the building, must be 15' off of the building bringing it closer to Mandalay. The existing fire hydrant can be used for the Fire Department Connection and the second Fire Hydrant being added can be placed at the north end of this project. Revise PRIOR TO CDB 12/15/2006 Revised plan shows the Fire Department Connection off of the building but the hydrant is NOT marked on the north end of the building as additional fire hydrant.(JFK) 1/16/2007 Revised plan did not address this comment, second Fire Hydrant is not marked. (JFK) 2. Exits do not go directly to a public way. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 12/15/2006 Will be addressed when building plans are submitted. (JFK) 1/16/2007 Revised plan did not address this.(JFK) Wayne <<Mandalay 635 CDB Letter.doc>> No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.14/636 - Release Date: 1/18/2007 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:10 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Cc: Keller, James Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - I am placing this case on the February 20, 2007, CDB agenda (see attached letter - original letter being mailed). However, I still need for you to address the following comments with revised plans (#1 below) and letter/email (#2 below) by Wednesday, January 24, 2007: Fire Department: 1. Plan has the Fire Department Connection too close to the building, must be 15' off of the building bringing it closer to Mandalay. The existing fire hydrant can be used for the Fire Department Connection and the second Fire Hydrant being added can be placed at the north end of this project. Revise PRIOR TO CDB 12/15/2006 Revised plan shows the Fire Department Connection off of the building but the hydrant is NOT marked on the north end of the building as additional fire hydrant.(JFK) 1/16/2007 Revised plan did not address this comment, second Fire Hydrant is not marked. (JFK) 2. Exits do not go directly to a public way. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 12/15/2006 Will be addressed when building plans are submitted. (JFK) 1/16/2007 Revised plan did not address this.(JFK) Wayne Mandalay 635 CDB Letter.doc .rtto LONG RANGE PLANNING DGVEI.OPMBNT RFVIi?W CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OHI icr•. Box 4748, CI.FARWATFP,, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SIiRVICI:s BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRi-u? AVFNUF, CLIHARWAT@R, FLORIDA 33756 TI;L1EPHONr (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 January 18, 2007 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Community Development Board Meeting Case Nos. FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031, 635 Mandalay Avenue Dear Ms. Ruggiero: Case Nos. FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402, for property located at 635 Mandalay Avenue, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on February 20, 2007. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3`d floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, M. WA WarWells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending casesl Up for the next CDBIMandalay 635 Tiffany Terrace (T) 2.20.07 CDB - WWIMandalay 635 CDB Letter.doc FRANK I IMI4ARU, MAYOR J()I m DOkAK, C<n,NCU,Mut:ai+r:R tlM-1 11 N111:1 N, C A NCILMEMBFR 13n.i. JImsI>N, CUIiKCII.>ntnusit?; CARLF:y A. PrrtasltN, "FQ[JAI. EMJ1I0YDII'.NT AND AI'I'IR.%,ATIvF: ACTION Ilmi, .cn F:W' 11 Northside EftXWO161 670c, January 9, 2007 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Ave - Tiffany Terrace - Response to Additional Comments Dear Mr. Wells: Listed below are responses to the comments received via email today: Zoning Comments Due 12/21/2006 CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL ORIGINAL RECFI\/F:" JAN 1! 2007 PLANNING DEPARWmtNT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. Plans have been revised to provide a zero setback for the 6" decorative overhangs and columns with the wall at a 6" setback. The Civil Site Data Table has been revised to reflect the corrected setbacks. NO portion, of the building, overhangs or columns are 1proposed beyond the property line and into the ROW. 2. a. Architectural plans have been revised to more clearly and correctly depict the FF elevations b. Building from grade to Midpoint of roof 63'l 1 c. BFE to Midpoint of Roof 58'9-1/2" Zoning Comments Due 12/27/2006 J1. The floor plans vary, the 4h floor layout is different and the a/c units are on the exterior balcony. The balcony area has been labeled to provide more clarity. 42. See revised C-1 for new Color Legend. 43. Transoms type mullions were provided but were hidden behind the decorative overhang. Plans have been revised to more clearly depict the transoms. The bedroom areas have multi-pane windows with fixed glass and mullions. 44. Note relating to clear height on Sheet C-1 has been revised. J5. See revised Sheet C-1 for a breakdown per elevation as per your request. 17. 6. Civil Sheets have been revised to correctly 6ppict sidewalks. Sheet A-1 has been revised to provide access door. 18. Architectural Plans have been revised to more clearly depict the wall and open area. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH@NORTHSIDEENGINEERIN6.COM 727.443-2869 FAX 727.446.8036 • • . ?r • 49. Widow's walk has been deleted from all plans and elevations per Architect. 110. Architectural plans have been revised accordingly, columns have been provided If you have any questions or concerns relating to this response letter, please contact our office. cerely, enee Ruggiero Project Planner Tiffany Terrace #639 12.14.06 635 Mandalay Ave Northsqde 0#wote v S'eu*", Sac. • CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: January 11, 2007 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031, 635 Mandalay Avenue NES Proj# 639 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 15 Reduced Civil Plans 15 Sets 4 Sheets of Civil and Landscape Plans, Signed and Sealed 15 Sets of Architectural Plans Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: Renee Ruggiero, Project Pla Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams ORIGINAL RECEIVED If`,A t 1 2007 PL b, E?. CITIi 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARW ATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH@NORTHSIDEENGINEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 10 1 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:06 AM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - This application has gone to the DRC and been found sufficient to move forward, so long as the DRC comments are adequately addressed. Because some comments are more critical as to specifically advertising the request or represent a major design flaw, such comments when not adequately addressed can hold up placing the request on the next CDB agenda. At this point nothing has been advertised and it isn't on a CDB agenda. What you have requested is to delay placing the request on the next agenda (January) and, assuming you satisfactorily address the critical comments, then it can be placed on the following CDB agenda (February). So...there is no meeting to attend for this delay. You are just in a holding pattern right now awaiting a resubmission addressing at least the critical comments you were sent. The second email included those comments not critical to advertising the request or were not major design flaws, which still need to be fixed on the application material going to the CDB, which is why they were separated into the second email. I am awaiting your resubmission addressing most likely all of the outstanding comments so that I can place the request onto the February CDB agenda. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:55 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Thanks for the quick response, I completely understand about the advertising issue/deadline.... been there done that My last question relates more to the process, do you or Mr. Delk approve or deny the continuance request or does the CDB and if CDB is it at a formal meeting and will I need to attend ? Thanks again Wayne, Renee -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:49 PM To: Renee Ruggiero Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Yes, I did receive it. No, no problem delaying this request. Yes, the date for resubmission is correct. No, I think you did a great job. The problem is that I have a machine that is running (agendas) and I can't delay putting items on the next agenda (deadlines). Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:Renee@northsideengineering.com] e Z* 0 • Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Okay thanks, did you receive my letter requesting a continuance ? If so, do you think there will be a problem with the request and did I have the resubmission date correct? Also, is there anything relating to the continuance request that I may need to know from a procedural standpoint as this is my first continuance request. Thank you for kind direction ....as always! Renee -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:33 PM To: Renee Ruggiero Cc: Angel Haines Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Please add to the non-critical items to be addressed the following comment: 1. Sheet C1.1 - Change in the Site Data table the GFA from 1,249 to 1,253 square feet. Thanks. Wayne No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: 12/19/2006 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: 12/19/2006 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: 12/19/2006 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: 12/19/2006 3 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:49 PM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Yes, I did receive it. No, no problem delaying this request. Yes, the date for resubmission is correct. No, I think you did a great job. The problem is that I have a machine that is running (agendas) and I can't delay putting items on the next agenda (deadlines). Thanks Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Okay thanks, did you receive my letter requesting a continuance ? If so, do you think there will be a problem with the request and did I have the resubmission date correct? Also, is there anything relating to the continuance request that I may need to know from a procedural standpoint as this is my first continuance request. Thank you for kind direction ....as always! Renee ----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:33 PM To: Renee Ruggiero Cc: Angel Haines Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Please add to the non-critical items to be addressed the following comment: 1. Sheet C1.1 - Change in the Site Data table the GFA from 1,249 to 1,253 square feet. Thanks. Wayne No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: 12/19/2006 i • 0 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: 12/19/2006 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:33 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Cc: Angel (Haines) Crisp (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Please add to the non-critical items to be addressed the following comment: 1. Sheet C1.1 - Change in the Site Data table the GFA from 1,249 to 1,253 square feet. Thanks. Wayne • 0(@F?MZHM December 20, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053 Tiffany Terrace - 635 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Wells: C CIVIC. • LAND PLANNIN& • ENVIRONMENTAL • In order to properly address and respond to the comments we received from you on December 20, 2006 at 12:28 pm, we respectfully request a continuance to the February 20, 2007 Community Development Board meeting. The requested continuance will allow us an appropriate amount of time to better address your comments for submission to the Community Development Board. It is my understanding that re-submission must be made by noon on January 11, 2007 for the February 20, 2007 CDB meeting. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to attempt to respond to your comments and remain on the January 16, 2007 CBD agenda, but we can not properly respond in less than 24 hours. If additional information is necessary, please contact me. Y? R(]4Rehee Ruggiero, G Y Project Planner, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Cc: File Danny Patel Ed Smeltz N. Pelzer ?L 'cC R r ED DEC 2 6 2006 PLANNING DEP CITY OF CLEARWATEtt 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARW ATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECHrd?AiORTHS ?EEN41NEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 • E Wells, Wayne From: Angel Haines [Angel@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 4:08 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Renee Ruggiero; esmeltz1 @tampabay.rr.com; dan@clearwaterview.com Subject: Reqst for continuance to CDB 12 20 06.doc T-J Reqst for intinuance to CDB 1 Good afternoon Mr. Wells, Attached is a request for a continuance letter for 635 Mandalay Ave - Tiffany Terrace. Thanks! Angel Haines Crisp Executive Administrative Assistant Northside Engineering Services, Inc. T 727.443.2869 / F 727.446.8036 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.25/593 - Release Date: 12/19/2006 <<Regst for continuance to CDB 12 20 06.doc>> • Northside Engineering Services, Inc. December 20, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053 Tiffany Terrace - 635 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Wells: • CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL In order to properly address and respond to the comments we received from you on December 20, 2006 at 12:28 pm, we respectfully request a continuance to the February 20, 2007 Community Development Board meeting. The requested continuance will allow us an appropriate amount of time to better address your comments for submission to the Community Development Board. It is my understanding that re-submission must be made by noon on January 11, 2007 for the February 20, 2007 CDB meeting. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to attempt to respond to your comments and remain on the January 16, 2007 CBD agenda, but we can not properly respond in less than 24 hours. If additional information is necessary, please contact me. Sincerely, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Cc: File Danny Patel Ed Smeltz N. Pelzer 601 CLEVELAND S'R'EFF, SUITE'' 930 CLEARWATE R, FLORIDA 33755 TEUI aNOR'I`HSIDEENGINL: ER.1NG.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 12/20/2006 15:57 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG qk1cq PAGE 01/02 Northside CIVIL LANDSCAPF, EIMRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION • FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 20, 2006 TIME: TO: Mr. Wayne Wells FAX NO: OF: Clearwater Planning Dept 4:10 pm, PAGE 1 OF 2 562-4865 FROM: Angel H. Crisp, Executive Administrative Assistant PROJECT NAME: 635 Mandalay Ave / NES 639 COMMENTS: Enclosed is a request for a continuance letter. PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS PROTECT, 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 T (727) 443-28691F (727) 446-8036 E-MAIL: ADMIN@NORTHSIDEENGINEERING.COVI 12/20/2006 15:57 7274466 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 02/02 IC FV 9N<. Northside M i7MV$ :'rJKM rr%a7 A1L 5rc,+WMa Sarafe A, 4744, December 20, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue . Clearwater, Florida. 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053 Tiffany Terrace - 635 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Wells: In. order to properly address and respond to the comments we received from you on. December 20, 2006 at 12:28 pm, we respectfully request a continuance to the February 20, 2007 Community Development Board meeting. The requested con.tinuanee will allow us an appropriate amount of time to better address your comments for submission to the Community Development Board.. It is my understanding that re-submission must be made by noon on January 11, 2007 for the Fohma.ry 20, 2007 CDB meeting. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to attempt to respond to your comments and remain on. the January 16, 2007 CBD agenda, but we can not properly respond in less than 24 hours. If additional information is necessary, please contact me_ Y LR nee Ruggiero, :?2. Project Planner, Northside Engineering Services, Tree, Cc: File Danny Patel Ed. Smeltz N. Pelzer GQ1 CLE- EL A,RND STRVET, 54Ri"II C ' io CU Air. W4.71 W7.. FLORMA 3??-*755 '?r?%?9?;?lih?I?Ulit'?'I!?9.?n?E?h`?4e!I?tiT?IEiiBMG.'[1Ctii A?+L 727.443,71664 FAX 7) 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 2:34 PM To: 'renee@northsideengineering.com' Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue No. The add needs to be to the City Clerks office on Thursday afternoon. -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero (mailto:renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 1:23 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Wayne, is there anyway to have at least until friday at 9 ? B1ackBerry service provided by Nextel -----Original Message----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:27:38 To:<renee@northsideengineering.com> Cc:<angel@northsideengineering.com> Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - The following items need to be addressed immediately (by 9 am on Thursday morning [12/21/061) to keep this case on course for the January 16, 2007, CDB meeting: Zoning: 1. 12/20/06 - WW My recollection of the DRC meeting was that it was stated the building did not encroach into the front setback, that the stairwell was set back on the ground/first floor a certain distance to allow the stairwell for the second/third/fourth floors to be at a zero front setback. The Site Data table on Sheet C1.1 states six inches, but Exhibit A of the written material states zero front setback. If the elevations on Sheet C-1 are drawn to scale, the protrusion of the stairwell at the second/third/fourth levels is 1.75 feet (which is not six-inches) and the dimension the roof overhangs into the right-of-way above the fourth floor is two feet. Response sheet also provides conflicting information. Provide proper dimensions on the north elevation on Sheet C-1, on Sheet C2.1 and in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1 and in Exhibit A. 11/27/06 - WW Ground floor plan indicates (as well as civil plans) that the stairwell is at a zero front setback. Based on the elevations on Sheet C-1, it appears that above BFE the building (stairwell) protrudes 8 - 9 inches into the right-of-way of Mandalay Avenue. At the facia line of the first floor and continuing to the fifth floor, it appears that this stairwell protrudes an additional six inches beyond the 8 - 9 inches mentioned earlier. Is this correct, that you are proposing this stairwell to extend into the right-of-way? Section 3-908.A.1 permits certain encroachments, but not of this nature (actual building), but when it does, it requires a clearance of nine feet over grade be maintained (this proposal does not). Additionally, the floor plans appear to have been cut off on the front elevation as to roof and columns. Please check and revise accordingly. Finally, based on the floor plans and elevations, the pitched roof over the first floor balconies on either side of the stairwell appears to extend in front of the stairwell on the front elevation, which is unclear as to such based on the floor plans and the north and south elevations. Revise/advise. 2. Sheet C-1 - a. Finished floor elevations to the side of the west (front) elevation are confusing. It 1 0 appears the 3rd floor FFE is incorrect. b. If the west (front) elevation drawing has been drawn to scale, the height from BFE to midpoint of the pitched roof measures 58.75 feet. c. If the west (front) elevation drawing has been drawn to scale, the pitched roof scales 21 feet from roof truss bearing to the top of the roof. Midpoint would be 101-6" feet. Adding 101-6" feet to the roof truss bearing dimension of 531-4" would produce a building height from BFE to midpoint of the pitched roof of 63.83 feet (631-1011). Scaling from the roof truss bearing dimension line to the midpoint of the pitched roof is 11.75 feet (?) Provide correct dimensioning. I have other items that are not as critical, but still need to be addressed on revised civil and architectural drawings, and I will put, these into a separate email. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 12:28 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Cc: Angel (Haines) Crisp (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Following are the items needed to be changed by no later than noon on Wednesday, December 27, 2006, on the civil and architectural plans and/or application material for this application, that are not as critical as the prior email sent to you this morning: Zoning: 1. 12/19/06 - WW A/C units on the fourth floor appear to be in a "laundry" room back by the trash chute. I thought they were to be shown on the balcony. Revise. 11/27/06 - WW If the a/c units are to be on unit balconies, show their locations on Sheet A-1 (including the commercial unit a/c locations on the roof of the ground floor tenant spaces). 10/23/06 - WW Show location of exterior a/c units and required screening. 2.12/19/06 - WW Notations on Sheet C-1 are inadequate to indicate the proposed color scheme. Add additional notes or go to a numbering system of colors with a legend as to the colors the numbers represent. Revise. 11/28/06 - WW Response sheet indicates that Sheet C-1 has been amended; however, I don't see any change. Comment is still applicable. 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Indicate the proposed color scheme by writing the names of the colors on the applicable portions of the building. The 8.5"x11" colored plans appear inconsistent as it relates to the first floor colors. It appears that "white mountain" is indicated on the ground floor and "portions" of the first floor, while "tender touch" is for the second through fifth floors. Indicate on all elevations for clarity. 3.12/19/06 - WW Response states the windows are "horizontal sliders throughout." Further, the west facade has "transom type mullions to break up the single pane appearance." I don't see this depicted on the elevations on Sheet C-1. Thank you for showing such on the east elevation, but it wasn't consistently shown on this elevation (see fourth floor). Revise. 11/28/06 - WW Other than potentially the windows in the commercial units on the ground floor, single pane large windows do not give any character to the building. Is it possible to have multi-paned windows, potentially also for the commercial units? Will the required egress windows look any different than the inoperable windows (double hung, etc.)? 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Are all of the windows intended to be inoperable large pane windows, or will the windows be multi-paned and some operable? If they are intended to be multi-paned, show as such. 4.12/20/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Note #2 is still incorrect as to the clear height of the ground level parking. It will not be 10-foot clear, as there will be lighting, fire sprinklers and piping under the first floor slab that will reduce this "clear" height. There will also be the roll-up door that reduces this "clear" height. Revise Note #2 to be the same as note on Sheet C2.1. 11/29/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Note #2 states that the parking garage height is 10'-0" clear. This is not correct, as it appears that the ground floor to first floor is 10'-8" (assuming a floor slab depth of eight inches), which leaves 10 feet. However, there will be lighting, fire sprinklers and piping under the first floor slab that will reduce this "clear" height. Additionally, there appears to be an overhead door proposed on the south side. The elevations on Sheet C-1 don't show the location of the overhead door, nor the opening height. ADA Code requires a clear height of 8'-2". Revise. 5.12/20/06 - WW Still need to provide. What I am referring to is starting on Page 56 of Beach by Design, not the Old Florida District .4 ty ? • requirements. You did refer to containing more than 60 percent windows and ornamentation. I need specific numbers per elevation of the building. 12/4/06 - WW Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines, including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). 6. Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 - Northern doorway into the northern retail tenant space was eliminated, but the sidewalk for the doorway has not been removed. Revise. 7. Response to Planning Comment #27 states that a new dumpster has been added to the north end of the garage with a door to allow access from the garage to this dumpster. Sheet A-1 does not show any rear door inside the garage to allow such access. Revise. Additionally, Sheet C-1 indicates a six-foot high wall shielding the parking from view along the east elevation, however, the doors opening to the alley are only shown less than six feet. Was this intended to have the doors only about five feet tall, requiring the person moving the dumpster to or from the staging area to duck under the door frame? 8. Six-foot wall along the east and north side of the building has been shown, however, the wall needs to be dimensioned as six feet and to indicate "open to garage" on the east elevation north of the center trash room. 9. Sheet C-1 - Widow's walk is still shown on the south elevation. Remove. 10. Sheet C-1 - If the wall with the windows for the Unit 102 is 5.1 feet from the northern property line, but there are columns holding up the roof on the north side of Unit 202 located 2.1 feet from the north property line (see west elevation), then the north elevation should be showing the columns holding up the roof on the north side of Unit 202. Revise. Additionally, if there are columns on the first level holding up the roof at the second level (Unit 202), then the columns should show up on the floor plan for Unit 102 on Sheet A-1. Revise. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 12:28 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Cc: Angel (Haines) Crisp (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - The following items need to be addressed immediately (by 9 am on Thursday morning [12/21/06]) to keep this case on course for the January 16, 2007, CDB meeting: Zoning: 1. 12/20/06 - WW My recollection of the DRC meeting was that it was stated the building did not encroach into the front setback, that the stairwell was set back on the ground/first floor a certain distance to allow the stairwell for the second/third/fourth floors to be at a zero front setback. The Site Data table on Sheet C1.1 states six inches, but Exhibit A of the written material states zero front setback. If the elevations on Sheet C-1 are drawn to scale, the protrusion of the stairwell at the second/third/fourth levels is 1.75 feet (which is not six-inches) and the dimension the roof overhangs into the right-of-way above the fourth floor is two feet. Response sheet also provides conflicting information. Provide proper dimensions on the north elevation on Sheet C-1, on Sheet C2.1 and in the Site Data table on Sheet C1.1 and in Exhibit A. 11/27/06 - WW Ground floor plan indicates (as well as civil plans) that the stairwell is at a zero front setback. Based on the elevations on Sheet C-1, it appears that above BFE the building (stairwell) protrudes 8 - 9 inches into the right-of-way of Mandalay Avenue. At the facia line of the first floor and continuing to the fifth floor, it appears that this stairwell protrudes an additional six inches beyond the 8 - 9 inches mentioned earlier. Is this correct, that you are proposing this stairwell to extend into the right-of-way? Section 3-908.A.1 permits certain encroachments, but not of this nature (actual building), but when it does, it requires a clearance of nine feet over grade be maintained (this proposal does not). Additionally, the floor plans appear to have been cut off on the front elevation as to roof and columns. Please check and revise accordingly. Finally, based on the floor plans and elevations, the pitched roof over the first floor balconies on either side of the stairwell appears to extend in front of the stairwell on the front elevation, which is unclear as to such based on the floor plans and the north and south elevations. Revise/advise. 2. Sheet C-1 - a. Finished floor elevations to the side of the west (front) elevation are confusing. It appears the 3rd floor FFE is incorrect. b. If the west (front) elevation drawing has been drawn to scale, the height from BFE to midpoint of the pitched roof measures 58.75 feet. c. If the west (front) elevation drawing has been drawn to scale, the pitched roof scales 21 feet from roof truss bearing to the top of the roof. Midpoint would be 10'-6" feet. Adding 10'-6" feet to the roof truss bearing dimension of 53'-4" would produce a building height from BFE to midpoint of the pitched roof of 63.83 feet (63'-10"). Scaling from the roof truss bearing dimension line to the midpoint of the pitched roof is 11.75 feet (?). Provide correct dimensioning. I have other items that are not as critical, but still need to be addressed on revised civil and architectural drawings, and I will put these into a separate email. Wayne N December 14, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Ave - Tiffany Terrace DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: • CIVIL* LAND PLANNING* ENVIRONMENTAL* TRANSPORTATION • Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on December 7, 2006. General En2ineerin? Prior to CDB: 1. See revised C3.1 FDC is located a minimum of 15' from building. 2. See revised C3.1; Fire Hydrant assembly is located within 40' of the FDC. 3. See revised C2.1 for 30' turning radius as per Code. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit: 1. See revised C3.1 FDC is located a minimum of 15' from building 2. See revised C3.1 for new location of Fire Hydrant assembly at north end of site Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Per DRC discussions N/A, Parking meters if installed not the responsibility of the developer. ORIGINAL RFP_F1Vrn Environmental CEO. 14 Zi Q6 1. See attached Exhibit B for vault justification. PLANNING DEPARIMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Fire 1. The Garage area below the building is 33% open to the exterior. The remaining 67% consists of .6' high concrete block wall and commercial store frontage on Mandalay. 2. Locations of FDC and FHA revised please see revised C3.1. 3. Widows walk has been eliminated. r 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM Page 1 of5 NESTECH©MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 4. The front and rear exits lead directly to the exterior of the building. Front through the fire rated enclosed entry, rear to the alley. Landscaping 1. Acknowledged, plants have been staggered to allow access to meters. 2. All corrections have been made the tables now match the plant counts. 3. All corrections have been made the tables now match the plant counts 4. Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been included with this resubmission. Parks and Recreation 1. Acknowledged, recreation impact fee are to be paid prior to building permit or final plat. 2. Acknowledged, requirements of the Public Art and Design Impact Fee prior to issuance of building permit. Stormwater 1. An inlet discharging directly into the vault to collect runoff so it does not spread onto the adjacent the property has been added on that side and a drainage tile to downspout discharge has also been added. Note "North gutter shall be oversized and downspout to tie into drainage tile." added to sheet C3.1 Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit: 2. Acknowledged, approved SWFWMD permit must be obtained and provided prior to issuance of building permit. 3. See response to Stormwater #1. Gutter and downspouts provided, water directed to vault. Solid Waste 1. See revised Civil plans for additional dumpster located along alley, enlarged trash staging area to accommodate an additional dumpster. ORIGINAL Traffic Engineering RECEIVED 1. Exhibit A has been removed from Parking Study 2. Exhibit E has been removed from Parking Study vr? 1 4 ZQ06 3. Exhibit G has been revised to correctly indicate availability PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Note(s): CITY OF CLEARWATER 1. Acknowledged, TIF must be paid prior to CO 2. Acknowledged, additional comments may be forthcoming associated with Building Permit Review. Planning (D We acknowledge Condition of Approval: Recreation impact fee to be paid prior to building permit or final plat. We acknowledge Condition of Approval: Declaration of Unity of Title to be recorded in public records prior to issuance of building permit. Page 2of5 • • 13 We acknowledge Condition of Approval: The final design and color of the building shall be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by the CDB. 14. All overhangs are 2'-0". See sheet A-1. J5. C-1 now shows all stepbacks. G We acknowledge Planning #6 Condition of Approval to be included in the Staff Report We acknowledge Condition of Approval: Condominium Plat to be recorded prior to issuance of the first CO egg. Condensers are now shown on A-1. ® We acknowledge Condition of Approval relating to the requirements of the Special Warranty Deed contained within Planning Comment #9. ® We acknowledge Condition of Approval relating to signage contained within Planning Comment #10 B 1We acknowledge Condition of Approval contained within Planning Comment #11 Colors are now noted on elevations sheet C-1. . --13. North Wall of.Unit 102 is 5'-1" and Units 202 and 302 being 8'-4" from the property line allow for unprotected window openings of 25% (as building is totally sprinklered). We propose 20.6% window area over this wall area. Unit 402 being setback 15'-4" is allowed 45% window openings, we are proposing 241/o window openings. ®Windows are horizontal sliders throughout. The west fagade has transom type mullions to break up the single pane appearance. . 15. Widows walk is eliminated. X16. Cad error, revised. J 17. All windows and doors are shown. 118. Roll up only on South Entrance to Garage. 9 Elevations to Top or Finish Floor. All heights are corrected and noted. 20. Stairwell to be setback 6" from property line allow ,for decorative Gable as shown on front elevation. Typical roof overhangs to be 2'-0". No roofs or overhangs to encroach into ROW. X21. Typical Floor Plan on A-1. J22. Cad Error, revised. J 23. Eliminated North Entry Doors. J24. North building setback 2.1' which equals 2'-1 %4". Sheet C2.1 . is correct, the north building setback is 2.1' and Sheet A-1 has been revised to correctly depict the 2.1' northern setback. 25 We acknowledge Condition of Approval: Any applicable Public Art and Design Impact fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 2?6 It is understood by the developer that prior to the issuance of any building permits this situation relating to the monitoring wells will need to be properly addresses to satisfy the City of Clearwater. The developer is currently investigating the status of the site relating to theses issues and will act accordingly. 127. See revised Civil plans for additional dumpster located at the northeast corner of the parking garage. Further, the architect has added a door to allow access to the new dumpster from within the garage. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN Page 3 of 5 CITY OF CLEARWATFD 0 0 1 28. Hot tubs are positioned in a manner not to be viewable from the ground level traffic. Pools beachside also are not private. 429. Architectural plans have been revised. 430. Fourth Floor is revised as requested. J31. Civil Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1 and Architectural Sheet A-I have been revised to correctly depict the 6' high wall along the east side of the building and also indicate "open above". 32. Width and length of building shown on A-1. 133. Cad error has been revised. 34 8'-2" clearance shall be provided from the entry door to the required handicap accessible space as required by ADA. J35. See revised sheet C3.1 - Section B-B provides dimensions and has been revised to indicate the use of Lava Rock for this area as sod is impractical. J36. Shared parking Diagram has been added to Sheet C1.1 X37. A Parking Study that was prepared by Northside, Engineering Services, Inc. has been provided to Traffic Engineering and has been determined to be acceptable. 438. Description of Request has been revised and the word accessory (as it relates to the retail portion of the use) has been deleted. X39. See revised response to General Applicability Criteria J40. See revised response to General Applicability Criteria J41. a. Millennium Mediterranean design refers to our new found materials and ability to make structures more decorative without the use of actual concrete embellishments. Additionally, the proposed Millennium Mediterranean design of the building reflects an old Florida vernacular with the proposed building finishes and lines; mixed with a Mediterranean flare providing elegantly appointed Mediterranean style roofs and varying roof lines; and is in keeping with the desires of the Beach by Design program. b. Some of the proposed planting are rated Florida Fancy which is a higher quality plant and more expensive than a Grade A plant, additionally in some areas plantings larger than the minimum prescribed by code are being provided. c. Acknowledged d. Acknowledged e. See revised response to General Applicability Criteria 142. a. In the large planting areas, plants of seven different heights, color and or texture are being provided creating seven depths of plantings. b. See revised narrative c. See revised narrative 43. See revised narrative addressing the Comprehensive-Infill criteria 144. Per discussions with Scott Rice, Steve Doherty and Wayne Wells during and after the DRC meeting, the plans have been revised to provide a handicap parking space somewhat central along the parking row. The island at the south end of the parking row has been retained; a note has been added to the plans that relating to the installation of landscaping and irrigation, radius has been added. ORIGINAL 45. See revised narrative RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 Page 4 of 5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEP 46. See revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for finished floor elevations of the retail space and grading of sidewalks. 47. An additional variance has been requested to address this issue. Also through discussions at DRC it was agreed that the first two parking spaces within the on-site parking area will be reserved for the operators/owners of commercial spaces so the spaces will be utilized by the persons less likely create multiple trips per day. 48. See revised Civil Sheet C1.1 for the -addition of the Mixed-Use Calculation form. 49. Commercial building area to be flood proofed in accordance with FEMA.manual 102. 50. See revised narrative. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, enee Ruggiero Project Planner Tiffany Terrace #639 12.14.06 635 Mandalay Ave ORIGINAL RECEIVED 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN CITY OF CLEARWATFP .Page 5 of 5 • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:46 PM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Subject: RE: New Code Section I believe this is what was adopted by City Council on November 2, 2006 (Ord. 7631-06). For your particular circumstance, the section of the Code amended started on Page 7, but the language is on Page 10. Just for information, look at the. the other provisions that were included in the ordinance. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:13 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: New Code Section Good Afternoon Wayne, Thank you for your time and consideration at today's DRC meeting, things went pretty well considering..... Please would you send to me the new code section relating to the 20 foot distance requirement from the property line to the 1 st parking space? I need the information for wording within the request and the narrative as well as for future use and sharing with co-workers. Thank you, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St, #930 Clearwater, FL 33755 T 727.443.2869 / F727.446.8036 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.14/578 - Release Date: 12/7/2006 12/7/2006 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:35 PM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Subject: RE: and... You got it!! -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 3:15 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: and... Please would you e-mail to me the revised DRC comments that were handed out at the meeting today for Tiffany Terrace. Thanks again Wayne, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Honhside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St, #930 Clearwater, FL 33755 T 727.443.2869 / F727.446.8036 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.14/578 - Release Date: 12/7/2006 12/7/2006 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 7:29 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Attached are the Draft comments for the December 7, 2006, DRC meeting for the above referenced project. The meeting time is 1:45 pm. I am also attaching the mixed use calculation. Wayne Inn 1h, Mixed Use draft 12.7.06 dre :alculation for 635 .. action agend... 03 CIVIL i 0 LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL U gs 5 revzu y .5MA6 , 94C. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL RECEIVED Date: November 30, 2006 NOV 3 0 2006 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III PLANNING DEPARTMENT OITY OF CLEARWATt';I? Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Tiffany Terrace /FLD2006-09053 NES Proj# 639 We Transmit: X Originals Enclosed Under Separate Cover Prints Mail UPS Overnight Addendum Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Shop drawings Specifications Per Your Request For Your Review & Comment Applications Floppy Disk X For Your Use For Your Approval For Your Files For Your Information 3 Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: Renee Ruggiero, Project Pla r Copies To: NES File 639 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARW ATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH@NORTHSIDEENGINEERING.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 ?I a zMFUMR CP:,*( November 6, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Ave DRC Response Dear Mr. Wells: 4 CIVIL C LAND PLANNING G ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION G Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on November 2, 2006. General Engineering Prior to CDB: (Per Steve Daugherty at DRC this should actually state PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT) 1. Acknowledged, Fire Department Connection is located a minimum of 15' from the building. See Civil Sheet C3.1 2. Acknowledged, Fire Hydrant Assembly is located within 40' of the Fire Department Connection. See Civil Sheet C3.1 3. We acknowledge that prior to permitting all substandard sidewalks and sidewalks ramps adjacent to or a part of this project shall be brought up to standard, including ADA with truncated domes per DOT Index #304. Items 4-10 are hereby acknowledged and accepted as required prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. Prior to the Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy: Items 9-12 are hereby acknowledged and accepted as required prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Environmental 1. We hereby acknowledge this item shall be properly addressed and accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the building permit. Fire , 1. Per Architect, Radio Systems will be provided per Regulation No. 7617-06. 2. The new proposed fire hydrant is in addition to the existing fire hydrant which will remain. 3. Application has been revised to correctly indicate that Fire Flow Calculations have been included with this submission. 4. Per Architect, Fire Pump is located on the 3rd floor adjacent to the elevator shaft. 5. Per Architect, fire sprinkler system is provided to all units and 6MMA, RECEIVED 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 RON 09 2006 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM Page 1 of4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM CITY OF CLEARWATER 727 • 443 - 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0 r We hereby acknowledge and accept the requirement relating to the installation of signage and clearance for the Fire Department Connection. We acknowledge that underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed by a licensed Class I, II or V contractor, complete and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Per Architect, a fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA72 and NFPA101 will be installed. Landscaping Items 1-3are hereby acknowledged, Please see Revised L1.1 for new Landscape Design Parks and Recreation 1. Acknowledged, the Recreation impact fee shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit or final plat. Stormwater 1. See revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for new design, ponds have been deleted and a larger vault has been provided under footprint of building 2. See revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for new design, ponds have been deleted and a larger vault has been provided under footprint of building 3. See Civil Sheet C3.1 for revised swale detail 4. See Civil Sheet C3.1 for revision, 18" RCP downsized to 12" DIP and revised pipe chart. 5. We hereby acknowledge prior to issuance of building permit the approved SWFWMD permit shall be provided. Solid Waste 1. The proposed location along the alley was preferred by Mr. Glenn; per our discussions at the DRC on Thursday, Nov. 2, 2006, the location will be acceptable. See revised Civil Sheets for reduced area for trash staging area and recycle bins as discussed. Traffic Engineering 1. Elevator locations have been labeled, see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 2. Handicap access aisle leading to the rear of the building has been deleted, please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 3. Columns have been relocated to allow better access of the spaces, see revised plans. 4. Two-way arrows have been added to Civil Sheet C2.1 for parking entrance. 5. A note depicting yellow safety paint has been added to Civil Sheet C2.1 to identify the "no parking area" at the northeast corner of the parking level. 6. See revised Sheet C2.1 for note relating to the required minimum 8'2" vertical clearance as per ADA standards. General Notes: 1. We acknowledge payment of TIF shall be received prior to Certificate of Occupancy 2. We acknowledge additional comments through Building Permit Review may be forthcoming upon submission of a Building Permit Application. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0V 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWWATER Page 2 of 4 Planning 1. As per the Planning Departments requirement, commercial space has been add to the ground level of the proposed development, see revised plans. 2. Per Architect, plans have been revised; ground floor and roof above are at the 2.1' setback. The 2nd story wall is not greater than 3'-0' from the property line, allowing window openings as shown. 3. Per Architect, roofs have been put on proper floors; total building length is only applicable to the ground floor, in an effort to provide windows on the north fagade of unit 102. 4. Per Architect, corrected as requested. 5. Per Architect, corrected as requested. 6. Per Architect, see revised architectural plans for labeling. 7. Per Architect, corrected as requested. 8. Per Architect, corrected as requested. 9. Per Architect, corrected as requested. 10. Per Architect, corrected as requested. 11. Per Architect, corrected as requested. 12. The trash area has been revised; the revisions include the addition of recycle bins. Additionally the staging area has been reduced. See revised plans. 13. The setback dimension to the northern property line is 2.1' and the plans properly reflect this dimension. 14. The revised plans provide decreased sidewalk dimensions within the property lines, See revised C2.1 15. Acknowledged, all existing driveways shall be removed. See note on revised sheet C2.1. 16. We hereby acknowledge this item shall be addressed and accepted by the City prior to the issuance of the building permit. 17. See revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for new design, ponds have been deleted and a larger vault has been provided under footprint of building 18. See revised Sheet C3.1 19. Per Architect, the majority of the windows are fixed glass, except those requiring bedroom egress. 20. Per Architect, window percentage within walls based on setbacks are permissible per Building and Fire Codes. 21. Per Architect, with the introduction of commercial space, non residential, but pedestrian interface at grade level is being provided. The remainder of the perimeter of the parking garage will be screened by 4'-0" concrete block walls on the east, with full walls on the north and gated entrance (metal roll-up security door). 22. Per Architect, electrical meters are located on the alley side of the building, adjacent to the trash room. 23. Per Architect, condensers are located on the balconies of the individual units as shown on the floor plans; the retail condensers are located above the retail space. 24. Per Architect, Cadd error, see revised sheet. 25. See revised C2.1 for corrected door location. 26. Per Architect, Cadd error, railings added. 27. Per Architect, "stepbacks" now shown on elevation to reduce confusion. 28. Roll up door has been provided; Civil Sheet C2.1 has been revised. 29. The application has been revised to reflect 635 Mandalay. 30. Conditions of approval contained within Items 30-37 are hereby acknowledged and accepted. Items 31-37 are acknowledged as conditions of approval. Page 3 of 4 0 38. See revised narrative, retail space has been added to development proposal. 39. See revised narrative 40. See revised narrative 41. Per Architect, paint color name is added to all elevations at proper locations. 42. We acknowledge that this project may be subject to the public art requirement. If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. cerely, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner Tiffany Terrace #639 635 Mandalay Avenue ORIGINAL RECEIVED 810 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 4 of 4 CIVIL. d LAND PL.ANNiN ENVIRONMENTAL 5 # tJ?. CSC. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: November 9, 2006 To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Dept. 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #220 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Ave NES Proj# 639 Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files Fnr 12/7/2006 DRC Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information We Transmit: X Originals X Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 15 Response to Comments Letter 15 Comp Infill Application 15 Letter of Authorization 15 Deed & Density Transfer Deed 15 Survey 15 Mixed Use Calculation 15 Fire Flow & Hydrant Worksheet 15 Shared Parking Diagram 15 Stormwater Report, 1 Signed and Sealed 15 Reduced Civil and Landscape Plans 15 TDR Packet with Survey of Sending Site 15 Sets (4Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans, 1 Signed and Sealed 15 Reduced Architectural Plans with Color Chi 15 Architectural Plans - Parking Study Forthcoming, Per Wayne Wells Please contact 27) 443-2869 sho have any questions or comments. By: ene uggiero, Project Planner ORIGINAL RECEIVED Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 NOV 0 9 2006 ATER FLORIpA 33755 CLEARIN PLANNING DEPARTMENT TECH@NORTHSIDEEN41NEERIN4.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 CITY OF CLEARWATER C7 C Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 6:09 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Cc: Angel Haines (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the November 2, 2006, meeting at 10:05 am for the above referenced case. Wayne draft 11.2.06 dre action agend... 0 0 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 7:19 AM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Cc: Ron Belko Subject: RE: Tiffany Terrace and FLD HELP Renee - In the Tourist District there are no perimeter buffer requirements. As most, if not all, of the required parking for this development is under the building (where no landscaping will grow) and, most likely, the vehicular use area outside of the building envelop will be less than 4,000 square feet, there will be no interior landscape area requirement. Foundation landscaping must be provided. Finally, look on Page 6 of the ordinance for the Old Florida District for the Landscape Buffers required under Beach by Design. Any reduction necessary would need to be part of the request (along with a Comprehensive Landscape Program application with justification for the reduction request and to identify where landscaping on the site has been increased to compensate). Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:Renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 3:21 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ron Belko Subject: Tiffany Terrace and FLD HELP Good Day Wayne, I know you stated you would be in the office on Sunday..... I hope you might be able to receive this and respond on Sunday so that I may forward your response to Ron Belko with Butler's Landscape Design on Sunday as he will be working on the landscape plan for this project over the week-end and early Monday. As we discussed in our meeting on Friday (and again thank you for making time for me !) I need to basically request variances to any items outside of the Development code and utilize the Beach by Design as a guidelines and justification for the variances/reductions........ Does this mean from a landscape perspective, any items that do not meet the standards within the Development Code I also need to request a variance to and utilize the new section of Beach by Design as a guideline for Landscaping and justification for approval ? I am not sure what the requirements are ..... are the requirements as laid out in the new Section of Beach by Design or the Development Code for this property as it relates to Landscaping ? Thanks Wayne, hope you had a great time with your Brother and a nice few days off ! Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Norihside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St, #930 Clearwater, FL 33755 T 727.443.2869 / F727.446.8036 Intemal Virus Database is out-of-date. 10/5/2006 ° 0 r CITY OF CLE,RWATER ClearWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM October 02, 2006 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, F133755 VIA FAX: 727-446-8036 RE: FLD2006-09053 -- 635 MANDALAY AVE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-09053. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on November 02, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, c14- M. V A& Wayn Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2006-09053 - 635 MANDALAYAYE 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 6:05 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. Please note the TDR application number and the address we are using. Wayne tu letter of ,mpleteness 10.2.06 P 'ZMURIR WC(p) 5"M" SMAka INC. October 2, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Tiffany Terrace / NES #639 Dear Mr. Wells: is CIVILo LAND PLANNING G ENVIRONMENTAL0 TRANSPORTATION G Please find listed below responses to the letter of incompleteness dated September 29, 2006: Site triangles are shown at the intersection of Royal Way and Mandalay Avenue, see revised sheets C2.1 and L 1.1. 2. Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 have been revised to show Mandalay Avenue in lieu of Mandalay Road. 3. We respectfully request your kind forgiveness and allowance to provide the signed and notarized Affidavit to Authorize Agent to you by 3 p.m. on Monday, October 02, 2006. The property owner resides on the west coast of Florida and is due to arrive in Pinellas County on September 30, 2006. The owner has an appointment at his attorney's office on the morning of Monday, October 02, 2006 and will deliver the document to us immediately after leaving his attorneys office. Immediately upon receipt of the documents we will hand deliver them to you. 4. Building elevations have been revised, per your request. 5. New information has been provided to reflect the TDR sender as Epic Holdings South, LLC, for the location of 685 Bay Esplanade. We respectfully request your kind forgiveness and allowance to provide the Statements of Deed of Transfer and Development Rights/Instrument of Conveyance no later than Wednesday, 10/3/2006 by 3 p.m. as the owner of the sending site is currently in route driving to Florida from the New York state and is due to will arrive on Tuesday, October 3, 2006. (See Revised TDR narrative.) ""WED 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM f U 1 2606 N ESTECHQMI N DS PRI NG.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 DEPARTMENT OF CLEARWATER I understand the requests contained within items 3 and 4 are beyond the normal process allowance, it is my hope that you will be able to work with us on the two outstanding documents. I further understand and acknowledge that should you allow the deferred submittal of the two documents, should the documents not be received within the time specified the project will be deemed incomplete for this cycle. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions, require additional information or if you would care to discuss any items contained within this letter. Respectfully, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner RECEIVE, Oc I u 1 2006 ,'LANNING DEPARIMeN, CITY OF CLEOWATER EMPEM sw MC) 5"a" sewm INC. October 2, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Tiffany Terrace / NES #639 Dear Mr. Wells: • CIVIL O LAND PLANNING G ENVI RON MENTAL O TRANSPORTATION G ORIGINAL RECEIVED y'CT 02 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Please find listed below responses to the letter of incompleteness dated September 29, 2006: 1. Site triangles are shown at the intersection of Royal Way and Mandalay Avenue, see revised sheets C2.1 and L 1.1. 2. Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 have been revised to show Mandalay Avenue in lieu of Mandalay Road. 3. The signed and notarized letters of Affidavit to Authorize Agent are provided within this resubmission. 4. Building elevations have been revised, per your request. 5. New information has been provided to reflect the TDR sender as Epic Holdings South, LLC, for the location of 685 Bay Esplanade. We respectfully request your kind forgiveness and allowance to provide the Statements of Deed of Transfer and Development Rights/Instrument of Conveyance no later than Wednesday, 10/3/2006 by 3 p.m. as the owner of the sending site is currently in route driving to Florida from the New York state and is due to will arrive on Tuesday, October 3, 2006. (See Revised TDR narrative.) I understand the request contained within item 5 is beyond the normal process allowance, it is my hope that you will be able to work with us on the one outstanding document. I further understand and acknowledge that should you allow the deferred submittal of the document, should the document not be received within the time specified the project will be deemed incomplete for this cycle. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions, require additional information or if you would care to discuss any items contained within this letter. ectfully, < enee Ruggiero Project Planner 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 10102/2006 10:34 72744E Northsi,de sw9a" $m" Isell October 2, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater. 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Tiffany Terrace / NES 4639 Dear Mr. Wells: NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 01/01 CIVIL • LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL O TRANSPORTxnON 10 Please find listed below responses to the letter of incompleteness dated September 29, 2006: Site triangles are shown at the intersection of Royal Way and Mandalay Avenue, see revised sheets C2.1 and Ll .1. 2. Sheets C2.1, C3.1. and L1.1 have been revised to show Mandalay Avenue in lieu of Mandalay Road. 3. The signed and notarized. letters of Affidavit to Authorize Agent are provided within this resubmission. 4. Building elevations have been revised, per your request. 5. New information has been provided to reflect the TDR sender as Epic Holdings South, LLC, for the location of 685 Bay Esplanade. We respectfully request your kind forgiveness and allowance to provide the Statements of Deed of Transfer and Development Rights/lnstminent of Conveyance no later than Wednesday, 10/3/2006 by 3 p.m. as the owner of the sending site is currently in route driving to Florida from the New York state and is due to will arrive on Tuesday, October 3, 2006. (See Revised TDR narrative.) . I understand the request contained within item 5 is beyond the normal process allowance " it is my hope that you will be able to work with us on the one outstanding document I further understand and acknowledge that should you allow the deferred submittal. of the document, should the document not be received within the time specified the project will be deemed incomplete .for this cycle. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions, require additional information or if you would care to discuss any items contained within this letten ectful.ly, cues Ruggiero Proiect Planner 601 CLEVELAND 5TRECT, 5UIT£ 93d CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NFSADMINPPAIND5PRINC.C,OM NE5TECH@MINDSPRIN6_C0M 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 - 8036 aor????odc? 5 es e"Awdr 9ei. Enclosed Mail Pick-Up Date: October 2, 2006 Per Your Request X For Your Use For Your Files To: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave #210 Clearwater, FL 33755 Reference: Tiffany Terrace / 635 Mandalay Avenue NES Proj# 639 I? LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Under Separate Cover UPS Overnight X Hand Delivered For Your Review & Comment X For Your Approval For Your Information CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 15 Response Letter 15 Revised TDR application 15 TDR Narrative 15 Warranty Deed 15 TDR Sending Site Ma 15 Fire Flow & Hydrant Worksheet 15 Sets (4 Sheets) of Civil and Landscape Plans, 1 Signed and Sealed 15 8.5 x 11 Elevations 15 Enlarged Elevations Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: -:,<::: 4eeRe Ruggiero, Project P Copies To: File, N. Pelzer, D. Williams 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARW ATER, FLORIDA 33755 TECH;-gNOR HSU>EENGINEE INC.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 RECE!!1 ?,> OCT O1 2 MANNING DEPAR,:. m CITY OF CLEOWAMP Clearwater September 26, 2006 Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, F133755 VIA FAX: 727-446-8036 RE: FLD2006-09053 -- 635 MANDALAY AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Housh Ghovaee : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-09053. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 41. Sheets C2.1 and L1.1 - Revise the sight triangles to be located along the property line of Royal Way (instead of the back of sidewalk) and show a sight triangle at the intersection of Royal Way and Mandalay Avenue (along the property lines). J2. Revise Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 to show Mandalay Avenue (not Mandalay Road). J3. Provide a signed and notarized Affidavit to Authorize Agent as part of the application. 14. Please remove the shadows from the building elevations (full size and reduced). It makes review very difficult. 5. The TDR Application indicates one dwelling unit is proposed to be transferred from 689 Bay Esplanade. Records with the City indicate that the existing 13-unit motel is still operating (occupational license is in an issued status) and there are no pending building permit applications to demolish the existing motel. Additionally, the Staff Report for FLD2005-08088 indicated that the overall property that was the subject of the Flexible Development application (685 and 689 Bay Esplanade) only permitted a maximum of 12-units, which means that 689 Bay Esplanade is nonconforming to density. Therefore, unless the motel immediately closes and is torn down, there are no units available to be transferred off that site. A dwelling unit from a different site is necessary to be transferred. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 10:00 am on Monday, October 2, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, • CITY OF CLEORWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM Letter oflncompleteness -FLD2006-09053 - 635 MANDALAYAVE • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 8:21 PM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Cc: Angel Haines (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031, 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne . y letter of completeness 9.26., 0 ! CIVIL H11\11fflFE1 LAND PLANNING C fF? e? ENVIRONMENTAL C E6"4m" smka ce TRANSPORTATION O LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: September 26, 2006 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Tiffany Terrace - 639 Mandalay Ave NES Proj# 0639 We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints X Enclosed Under Separate Cover Addendum Mail UPS Overnight Shop drawings Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Specifications X Applications t=7/ ^ OrTI, 0 90 :S? Floppy Disk Copies Description 1 Check #1015 for S 1,205 15 Flex Development Application (Comp. Infill.) 15 Warranty Deeds 15 Surveys (1 signed and sealed) 15 Stormwater Report & Narrative (1 signed and sealed) 15 Civil & Landscape Drawings (4 sheets) 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landscape Plan 15 8.5 X 11" Colored Elevations 15 8.5 X 11" Building Elevations 1 Color chip attached to Original Are. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings 15 TDR Application Packets 15 Surveys From Sending Site Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. Copies to: FILE B N. Pelzer Ar4fel Haines, Executiv n. Ass tant A. Haines 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRINC.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 9 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:26 AM To: 'nicholas fritsch' Subject: RE: 635 Mandalay Nick - The applicant is creating 11 new parking spaces (including one handicap space) on Mandalay that do not exist today (see Sheet C2.1 of the civil plans). These additional parking spaces increase the number of available spaces for this area and would be available to the proposed retail uses on this property. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: nicholas fritsch [ma ilto: nfritsch@tam pa bay. rr.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:57 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 635 Mandalay Ten parking spaces appear along Mandalay in the Landscape Plans 1-1.1. Will those be established with the development and can they be counted as an offset to the reduced on site parking? Otherwise, the reduced retail parking rqmt. seems too heavy that far north on Mandalay, there is not much pedestrian traffic. Thank You, Nick 2/20/2007 • MEMORANDUM 0 TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP ?)M vj Planning III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - 635 Mandalay Avenue DATE: February 2, 2009 Attached is information related to the request by Renee Ruggiero, Northside Engineering Services, Inc., for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 635 Mandalay Avenue. On February 20, 2007, the CDB approved a request for a Mixed Use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) for this site. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on February 20, 2010. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to the current market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a one-year time extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments that would significantly affect the project. There are no pending or approved code amendments that would significantly affect the project. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order January 7, 2008 Maps and Photos S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIMandalay 0635 Tiffany Terrace (7) - ApprovedlMandalay 635 Time Extension Memorandum for 3.17.09 CDB.doc • MEMORANDUM is TO: CDB Members ,_( FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III Y" 14 VJ RE: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031, 635 Mandalay Avenue DATE: February 15, 2007 After discussion with the applicant, Condition #5.f has been corrected to read properly, as provided below: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 689 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 689 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (689 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That the new parking spaces and landscape island within Mandalay Avenue meet the following requirements: a. the applicant construct the improvements at their expense; b. signage be erected by the City limiting the time for parking within these spaces; c. a 30-foot curb radius be provided on the landscape island; d. prior to the issuance of any permits; a right-of-way use permit be required, which will include approval of landscaping within the landscape island acceptable to the City Engineer; e. the landscape island include shrubbery to fill the island and one cabbage palm, where shrubbery be maintained at a height not to exceed 30-inches; and f, the landscape island be provided with irrigation; 6. That all dumpsters be enclosed within trash rooms or screened trash areas, including those for the commercial units, acceptable to the Planning and Solid Waste Departments, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 7. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the Royal Way right-of-way shall be installed for the site frontage prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; February 15, 2007 Memorandum - Page 2 9. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be monument-style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a final determination be made regarding the existing monitoring wells, acceptable to the Environmental Engineering and Planning Departments; 11. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, air conditioning units be screened from view from public streets or adjacent properties; 12. That, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant provide copies of the condominium documents designating the southernmost parking space on either side of the drive aisle for the owners/operators of the retail units; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: FebruM 20, 2007 Case Numbers: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09.0.31 Agenda Item: El Owner/Applicant: Don R. Whitehurst Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Address: 635 Mandalay Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Resort Facilities High (RFH) Category USE CATEGORY: BEACH BY DESIGN Old Florida CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Mixed Use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District SURROUNDING ZONING South: Tourist (T) District AND USES: East: Tourist (T) District West: Tourist (T) District Community Development Board - F FLD2006-0905 3/TDR2006-09031 Retail sales and services Overnight accommodations Overnight accommodations Overnight accommodations -bruary 20, 2007 - Page 1 of 12 0 0 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.28 acres is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way. The rectangular site is currently vacant, but formerly was developed with an automobile service station. The automobile service station was demolished in August 1990. Due to this prior development, there is no existing on-street parking on Mandalay Avenue in front of the subject property. This site is located in the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design. Property to the north along Mandalay Avenue is currently developed with retail sales and service uses, and with overnight accommodation uses farther north. The properties to the east, west and south are currently developed with overnight accommodation uses. Development Proposal: The development proposal for this property is for mixed use of eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail sales floor area. This site is located in the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design. This District specifically calls for limited retail/commercial and mixed use development along Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street. This redevelopment proposal for the subject property is for a mixed use, in compliance with the vision in Beach by Design for this area. Mixed use, however, is not a use provided for in the Tourist (T) District, and is the reason such request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The retail floor area has been designed to provide two retail units facing Mandalay Avenue at a three-foot front setback. Eight attached dwellings are proposed above the ground floor retail area and ground level parking garage. The building is 58.83 feet tall (to mid-point of pitched roof). Two dwellings are proposed per floor, with the units on the first level of approximately 2,535 square feet of conditioned living area, the units on the second and third levels of approximately 2,325 square feet of conditioned living area and the units on the top floor of approximately 2,045 square feet of conditioned living area. Residential units will have balconies on the east and west sides of the units. Each unit is designed for a hot tub on the western balcony. A total of 18 parking spaces are proposed on-site, primarily located under the building east of the retail floor area. Beach by Design Guidelines requires as least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has submitted information that the project is in compliance with the 60 percent Guideline through the use of windows, sliding glass doors, aluminum railings, balconies, and trim to meet this requirement. The proposed building has been designed using a Millennium Mediterranean architectural theme. The ground level parking and retail sales level, as well as the first level will be stucco painted sierra snow (a beige color). The second through fourth living floors will also be stucco painted inner peace (a light blue). Columns and trim will be painted mercury (white). The roof is a pitched hip roof finished with gray asphaltic shingles. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) and Density Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, the maximum allowable F.A.R. for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 1.0 and the maximum density is 30 dwelling units per acre. As a mixed use, the maximum development potential of the property is based on a mixed-use calculation. A mixed-use calculation indicates the proposed 1,253 square feet of nonresidential floor area and eight dwelling units is consistent with the maximums allowable. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan with regard to the maximum allowable F.A.R. and maximum allowable density. Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - Page 2 of 12 Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2-801.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.73, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Mixed use is not a use provided for in the Tourist (T) District, and is the reason such request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, comparison can be made to "Attached Dwellings" and "Retail Sales and Services". Pursuant to Table 2- 803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum lot area for both uses can range between 5,000 - 10,000 square feet. The subject property is 12,218 square feet in area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for both uses can range between 50 - 100 feet. The lot width of the subject property along Mandalay Avenue is 119.2 feet and along Royal Way is 102.5 feet. Based on this comparison, the proposal is consistent with Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks/Stepbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum front setback for attached dwellings and retail sales can range between 0 - 15• feet and the minimum side setback can range between 0 - 10 feet. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building) and a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area). The western stairwell for this proposal is designed at a zero front setback along Mandalay Avenue. The retail floor areas are designed at a three-foot front setback along Mandalay Avenue. The setbacks along Mandalay Avenue are in conformance with the Beach by Design "Old Florida" District requirements, which provides for a zero-foot front setback along Mandalay Avenue for 80 percent of the property line. The first level of the building is designed with the center of the building (stairwell) located at a zero front setback, with the living area at approximately 11 feet from the front property line of Mandalay Avenue. Balconies for all four living levels are further stepped back at approximately 25 feet from the Mandalay Avenue property line. The proposed stepback from Mandalay Avenue is in compliance with the Beach by Design "Old Florida" District requirements. The proposed building is located 15 feet from Royal Way, which meets the Tourist District requirement, as well as the minimum front setback requirement under the Beach by Design "Old Florida" District. The north side setback under the Beach by Design "Old Florida" District allows for a zero-foot side setback, however, the proposed building is located 2.08 feet from the north property line for the ground level and for the columns and roof for the first level. The first floor living area is further set back from the north property line an additional three feet to comply with Building Code requirements for percentage of openings (windows) on this north side. Looking at the west elevation of this proposed building, the building is stepped back on both the north and south sides of the building at the second and third levels 6.33 feet and an additional seven feet for the fourth level. These stepbacks are in compliance with Beach by Design "Old Florida" District requirements. While this is a corner lot where a side setback is required by Code on the east side, the Beach by Design "Old Florida" District requires a 10-foot "rear" setback. The proposed building meets this required 10-foot setback from the east property line. The building will have a refuse collection room on the ground floor on the east side of the parking level. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging areas on collection days. The location of the trash staging area at a zero setback from the east property line adjacent to the alley is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer developments. Proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable height for attached dwellings and retail sales can range between 35 - 100 feet. The proposed building has been designed at a height of 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) above Base Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - Page 3 of 12 0 0 Flood Elevation (BFE). The proposed height is consistent with the Beach by Design "Old Florida" District requirements of a maximum height of 65 feet (for attached dwellings). This proposed height is compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area. The building at 14 Somerset Street was approved/constructed at a height of 56 feet and the building approved/constructed at 15 Somerset Street is at a height of 61.66 feet. The proposed height is also compatible with buildings approved (but not yet constructed) along Bay Esplanade to the east, such as 651 Bay Esplanade (59 feet), 657 - 663 Bay Esplanade (59.66 feet) and 665 - 667 Bay Esplanade (65 feet). The site is within Flood Zone A and the Building Code does not permit the habitable area of the residential portion of the building to be situated below BFE; however, the retail sales portion may be below BFE as long as it is floodproofed. Based on these provisions, as well as having to meet vertical clearance requirements for handicap parking spaces, this usually means that parking for the project is accommodated on the ground floor and the building height is increased accordingly. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Code and with Beach by Design "Old Florida" District requirements with regard to the maximum allowable height. Minimum Off-Street Parking: The proposal takes sole access to Royal Way, in compliance with Beach by Design "Old Florida" District requirements not allowing access to Mandalay Avenue. Existing driveways on Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way will be removed and sidewalks constructed for the site frontages. Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum required parking for attached dwellings is two spaces per dwelling unit and required parking for retail sales and services can range between four - five spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA. Based on eight dwelling units (16 required spaces) and the proposed 1,253 square feet of proposed retail sales floor area (5 - 6 required spaces), a minimum of between 21 and 22 total parking spaces are required for this development. The applicant proposes 18 parking spaces on-site, including one handicap space, to accommodate the residential units in the building and one space each for the owner/operator of the retail/commercial units. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 22 spaces to 18 spaces. Section 2-803.K for retail sales and services in the Tourist District provides the following criteria for a parking reduction: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes. b. Adjacent land uses are of a nature that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; c. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted providing the justification for the reduction. The proposed reduction basically centers on the retail uses, where the proposal eliminates most required parking for the retail sales uses. Retail sales uses are envisioned as specialty, non-destination beach related retail shops that will draw their customers from pedestrians walking along Mandalay Avenue and from hotels/motels and attached dwellings within the area. The Parking Demand Study indicates adequate parking within municipal parking lots, on-street parking and from other uses within close proximity to serve the proposed retail sales floor area. The Beach Trolley also goes along Mandalay Avenue. Adequate parking is available within a reasonable walking distance of the project to support the requested reduction. This reduction is consistent with other similar uses along Mandalay Avenue and in the downtown area of Clearwater. Additionally, due to the removal of the driveways on Mandalay Avenue, Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - Page 4 of 12 • • the applicant is proposing to construct 11 new parking spaces within the existing roadway adjacent to other angled parking to the north. To separate turning movements from parked vehicles, a terminal landscape island is proposed at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way. This landscaped island will need to be designed with a radius of 30 feet when constructed. The proposed and existing parking spaces within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way are time-limited spaces (posted at a maximum of three hours). While these new parking spaces cannot be designated for the retail uses in this project, the provision of these additional spaces increases the overall parking available in close proximity to the subject site. Based upon the submitted Parking Demand Study and the provision of these 11 new parking spaces within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way adjacent to the subject site, the development proposal is consistent with the Code with regard to the minimum required number of parking spaces. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-20LD.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The applicant proposes air conditioning units for retail sales units on the roof above the retail units. Air conditioning units for the residential units are proposed on the balconies on the east side of the building. Railings are planned along the edges of these balconies. Actual screening will be reviewed at time of building permit. Based upon the above, the development proposal is, or will be, consistent with the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. There is only one driveway proposed for this property on Royal Way. The proposed building is not located within the driveway's sight triangles, but gating for the parking garage will be located within the triangles. The proposal is in compliance with the sight visibility triangle along the property lines at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way. The intent of the sight visibility triangles is to enable those vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing a right- of-way and those vehicles stopped at a stop bar while leaving a site to have a clear and unobstructed view of one another. The proposed encroachment will not result in a conflict with this intent, as those vehicles exiting the parking garage will still have adequate and safe clear and unobstructed view of vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing Royal Way. These encroachments upon the sight visibility triangles will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere under similar circumstances. It is noted that the City's Engineering Department has indicated support for this request. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to allowing the small "building" encroachment within the driveway's sight visibility triangles as set forth in Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance. Section 3-1406.B.2 requires a minimum distance of 20 feet between the right-of-way and the first parking space in the parking lot. Since the minimum setback in the Tourist District and in the Beach by Design "Old Florida" District is 15 feet and the parking is within a garage under the building, compliance with this Code requirement is a challenge. The applicant has proposed, with concurrence from the City's Engineering Department, to designate the southernmost space on either side of the drive aisle for the owners/operators of the retail units to minimize this issue. Due to the gated nature of this proposed development and the designation of the southernmost spaces for the owners/operators of the retail units, there is sufficient stacking area to meet the safety requirements of the Code, similar to the visibility triangle encroachment. Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 -Page 5 of 12 0 0 Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The civil site plan for this proposal indicates that all on- site electric and communication lines will be placed underground in conformance with this Code requirement. There do exist overhead utility lines along the frontage of Royal Way. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within this abutting right-of-way will need to be installed along this street frontage prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.1) of the Community Development Code, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. However, Beach by Design "Old Florida" District requires a 10-foot perimeter buffer along Royal Way. This proposal complies with this requirement, as the building is set back 15 feet from the Royal Way property line. Because there is less than 4,000 square feet of paved vehicular use area outside of the building footprint, no interior landscape area is required for this site (Section 3-1202.E.1). Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.2, a foundation landscape area of a minimum five-foot width is required along the building frontage of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way. The proposal includes a request to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue at least where the stairwell is located and to reduce the foundation landscaping to three feet in front of the retail units, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. The requirement for foundation landscaping is at odds with the goal of having the building adjacent to the property line, as envisioned by Beach by Design. The elimination of the foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue for the stairwell location and the reduction to three feet otherwise is consistent with other projects, along Mandalay, primarily south of Baymont Street. Other properties along the area from Bay Esplanade to Somerset also have buildings at a zero (or close to it) front setback along Mandalay Avenue. A hedge of dwarf green arboricola and viburnum will be planted between the retail units and the sidewalk along Mandalay Avenue. Other perimeters of the building will have similar hedging of combinations of dwarf green arboricola, viburnum and Indian hawthorn, accented by variegated flax lily and jasmine groundcovers. Palmetto palms, silver buttonwood and oleander trees will accent the northwest corner as well as the south and east sides of the site. The existence of overhead utility lines restricts the south side of the site to accent trees. The applicant is proposing to create new parking spaces within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way in front of the subject property. As part of these parking improvements and to separate turning movements from parked vehicles, a terminal landscape island is proposed at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way. This landscape island should be improved to include shrubbery to fill the island and one cabbage palm, where shrubbery will need to be maintained at a height not to exceed 30-inches (for sight visibility), as acceptable to the City Engineer. Irrigation will also be necessary to this landscape island. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - Page 6 of 12 Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The elimination of the foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue at least where the stairwell is located and to reduce the foundation landscaping to three feet in front of the retail units is included in the Comprehensive Landscape Program request. As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria, as discussed above. Solid Waste: The development proposal includes a trash room adjacent to the eastern stairwell for the residential units. A trash chute is provided in the residential units on each floor to deposit their trash. This trash room is of adequate size for the number of dwelling units proposed for both trash collection and recycling barrels. A separate dumpster area is provided in the northeast corner of the parking garage for the retail units. Dumpster and recycling staging areas on the east side of the site adjacent to the alley have been provided to allow truck pickup of dumpsters and recycling bins. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si triage: The applicant is proposing only attached signage for the retail sales units facing Mandalay Avenue with this development proposal and has indicated that all signage will meet the City's Sign Code requirements. It is unlikely, due to the location of the proposed retail sales portion of the building at a front setback of three feet on Mandalay Avenue, any freestanding signage will be necessary. Any approval of this application, however, should include a condition requiring any future freestanding signage to be a monument-style sign meeting Code requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR): Pursuant to Section 4-1402 of the Community Development Code, parcels governed by a special area plan, such as Beach by Design, may only receive residential density transfers from parcels within the same special area plan and may not exceed the otherwise applicable maximum density by more than 20 percent. Based upon the above, the subject property can receive a TDR for a maximum of one dwelling unit. With regard to the property at 689 Bay Esplanade, a maximum of nine attached dwelling units are possible on-site and the site has been approved for redevelopment under FLD2005-08088 (approved by the CDB on November 15, 2005) with eight attached dwellings; therefore one excess dwelling unit is Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031- Page 7 of 12 available for transfer. Accordingly, the TDR has been found to be consistent with the requirements of Section 4-1402 and Section 4-1403 of the Community Development Code as outlined in the following table: Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market X value of abutting properties; 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; X 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses; X 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function that enhances the X community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the Citv of Clearwater as a whole. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. 1.0 Mixed use calculation X' I.S.R. 0.95 0.73 X Density 30 dwelling units per acre Mixed use calculation X' Lot Area 5,000 -10,000 square feet 12,218 square feet X Lot Width West: 50 - 100 feet 119.2 feet X South: 50 - 100 feet 102.5 feet X Setbacks Front: 0 - 15 feet West: zero feet (to X1 building) South: 15 feet (to Xl building) Side: 0 - 10 feet East: zero feet (to trash X1 staging area) North: 2.1 feet (to X' building) Height 35 - 100 feet 58.83 feet (to midpoint of X' pitched roof) Off-Street Attached dwellings - Two spaces per 18 parking spaces2 X1 Parking unit; Retail sales - 4 - 5 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 21 - 22 spaces) I See Analysis above. z On-site parking proposed = 18 spaces. An additional 11 on-street parking spaces proposed in front of the site. Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - Page 8 of 12 ?J • COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: . a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - Page 9 of 12 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meetings of November 2 and December 7, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The subject 0.28 acres is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way; 2. The site is currently vacant; 3. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 4. The proposal is for the construction of a mixed-use building of eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area, in compliance with the vision in Beach by Design for this area; 5. The retail floor area has been designed for two retail units facing Mandalay Avenue at a three-foot front setback in compliance with the requirements of the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design; 6. The proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; 7. The proposed building height is 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The applicant proposes 18 parking spaces on-site, including one handicap space, to accommodate the eight residential units in the building at two parking spaces per unit and one space each for the owners/operators of the retail units; 9. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 22 spaces (six spaces for retail sales; 16 spaces for attached dwellings) to 18 spaces; 10. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted providing the justification for the parking reduction; 11. The proposal includes the construction of 11 new angled parking spaces within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way in front of the subject site, increasing the overall number of parking spaces available to the surrounding businesses and dwellings; 12. The proposed building meets the setback and stepback requirements of the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design; Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 -Page 10 of 12 13. The proposal includes the elimination of the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue at least where the stairwell is located and the reduction of the foundation landscaping to three feet in front of the retail units, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria; and 14. That there are no active Code Enforcement cases for this property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Development application to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 689 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 689 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (689 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That the new parking spaces and landscape island within Mandalay Avenue meet the following requirements: a. the applicant construct the improvements at their expense; b. signage be erected by the City limiting the time for parking within these spaces; c. a 30-foot curb radius be provided on the landscape island; Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 -Page 11 of 12 0 0 d. prior to the issuance of any permits, a right-of-way use permit be required, which will include approval of landscaping within the landscape island acceptable to the City Engineer; e. the landscape island include shrubbery to fill the island and one cabbage palm, where shrubbery be maintained at a height not to exceed 30-inches; and f. Provide irrigation to both of these landscape islands; 6. That all dumpsters be enclosed within trash rooms or screened trash areas, including those for the commercial units, acceptable to the Planning and Solid Waste Departments, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 7. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the Royal Way right-of-way shall be installed for the site frontage prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 9. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be monument-style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a final determination be made regarding the existing monitoring wells, acceptable to the Environmental Engineering and Planning Departments; 11. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, air conditioning units be screened from view from public streets or adjacent properties; 12. That, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant provide copies of the condominium documents designating the southernmost parking space on either side of the drive aisle for the owners/operators of the retail units; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: k?oa ?fl - fj?2& Wayne M )Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmenAC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIMandalay 635 Tiffany Terrace (7) 2.20.07 CDB - WWIMandalay 635 Staff Report. doe Community Development Board - February 20, 2007 FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - Page 12 of 12 0 0 Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wellsna,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; Reviewed building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, email; zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director; Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; Prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; Supervised six employees; Prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; Investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • • • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; Reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; Drafted ordinance revisions; General research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; Coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %2 years; Worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section • 0 Q LAUREL aBT¢ ?',.:; ::.:`.,,:,::.?:;,?. ::•::. ? ........::...:::...:. ? 900 0 Q KIPLING PLAZA Q aa0 ? ? N Su GARDENIA Si a11 <O ui? "N( a VERBENA q o ?p p MANGO ST p ? De D ? Ep? rc a am IRIS G ? O ASTER ACACIA ST PROJECT SOMERSET SITE MIBRW. o < EWILD AGO PPS -E YAL V 11f3e8WR O RE WOOD O BAY AVALON O O K? C? KEHDl?r L D '? N vpyM BAY SE S?O ???RW(AV.'AY Sw pp1N' SAYMONT ST gCIRF ??RZ maw a ? q a scN iM m o K ? a ?GCgy? N POINT h PAPAYA ST DORY PASSAGE D ? 8 e - - 3 Pier 60 Q Ceum-y BNd WINDWARD P SAGE Location Map FLD2006-09053 Owner: Don R. Whitehurst Case: TDR2006-09031 Site: 635 Mandalay Avenue Property Size(Acres): 0.28 PIN: 05/29/15/54747/084/0010 Atlas Page: 258A • • ads --° W ok? ,r? 24 =LL"NVALL S7' t r, , 40 ?-` a VI ` s M ? ' (RLILI't'l C ? f Aerial Map FLD2006-09053 Owner: Don R. Whitehurst Case: TD R2006-09031 Site: 635 Mandalay Avenue Property Size(Acres): 0.28 PIN: 05/29/15/54747/084/0010 Atlas Page: 258A 0 0 v° 8 657 7 6 1659 654 650 Q Q 2 a 648 fro a. 661 4 3 s55 2 1 ; (W4 6o a m 5 P 6 e 7 N 8 9 1 13 I 1 1 2 11 10 0 I I 655 ?? I:u ate. 5 ?DLEMLD T Q Q 9 Q 4 I -------------- N 1 6 7 8 1 3 I I 649 I 1 14 13 4 11 10 2 LL tee 1 i - -------- I ' 1 GLENDAL T - °a ME - 15 rAD 1 5 T? 631 ? 11 1 ? ((5-1 --------- 10 629 2 634 5 632 619 3 HEtLW00 T Zoning Map Owner. Don R. Whitehurst Case: Site: 635 Mandalay Avenue Property Size (Acres) : PIN: Atlas Page: 649 1 0 13 6p? ?h 1 FLD2006-09053 TDR2006-09031 0.28 05/29/15/54747/084/0010 258A • • MBRIA ST o 8 Overnight 6 r`?ttac?ied W iio s ccommod 657 i r '&bt 7 =658 dwellings 3 5 fcon na?da Is Nait w vernt t t g ccom ozatio s , Over ' 1 Oler'hl Iketa' Taca2t . cco s v4caw 1. 1 1 UN 41com. sale ; 655 -------------- 650 >- 5 Q Vacant IDLEWILD ST C Retail sales k baa 4 9 Z ai ?O erjighP 6 a cin&oda iois 3 vernight 60 °' { "3 Jun 60 commouatio s 14 13 4 ht 10 rig El al&o moda#ions m w c 6 Ove i ht g 1 a_ ace maWdagions GLENDALE ST 15 Attached ROYAL WAY dwellings 15 631 636 OV might 11 13 Overnight mmodaifio overnment I ace moda"ns well s 10 cs ° s ? 5 2 632 v2 619 3 cn HEILWOOD ST Existing Surrounding Uses Map FLD2006-09053 Owner. I Don R. Whitehurst Case: T D 82006-09031 Site: 635 Mandalay Avenue Property Size(Acres): 0.28 PIN: 05/29/15/54747/084/0010 Atlas Page: 258A View looking SE along Mandalay Ave at properties to the south of subject site (S of Royal Way) View looking northeast from Royal Way at overnight accommodations use to the east of subject site 635 Mandalay Avenue FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 I View looking southwest at properties along west side of Mandalav Avenue south of Glendale Street View looking NE from Royal Way at property to the east of subject site (alley between subject property and property to the east) Page 2 of 2 Y Akk View looking northwest from Royal Way at subject site (north side of Royal Way) View looking NE along, east side of Mandalay Avenue at properties north of subject site (north of Royal Way) t? y(« l ?f - View looking N W along W side of Mandalay Avenue at properties N of subject site (N of Royal Way) 635 Mandalay Avenue FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 Page 1 of 2 View looking W from Mandalay Avenue at propert on N side of Glendale Street across from subject sit, il'711yy ? • +rConditions Associated With FLD2006-09053 il,:"?? 635 MANDALAY AVE r )1 00 Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 11/30/2006 Plan has the Fire Department Connection too close to the building, must be 15' off of the building Not Met bringing it closer to Mandalay. The existing fire hydrant can be used for the Fire Department Connection and the second Fire Hydrant being added can be placed at the north end of this project. Revise PRIOR TO CDB 12/15/2006 Revised plan shows the Fire Department Connection off of the building but the hydrant is NOT marked on the north end of the building as additional fire hydrant.(JFK) 1/16/2007 Revised plan did not address this comment, second Fire Hydrant is not marked. (JFK) 11/30/2006 Exits do not go directly to a public way. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Not Met 12/15/2006 Will be addressed when building plans are submitted. (JFK) 1/16/2007 Revised plan did not address this.(JFK) Parks 8+ Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 10/10/2006 10/10/06 - FLD2006-09053 Not Met Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. 11/27/2006 The Public Art and Design Impact Fee may be due and payable on this project prior to issuance of Not Met building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. Solid Waste Service Tom Glenn 562-4930 12/04/2006 With the addition of retail space and no space in trash room, an additional dumpster will be required. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 10/23/2006 12/19/06, 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW J Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 10/23/2006 12/19/06,11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title document be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 10/23/2006 12/19/06,11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 10/23/2006 Y 12/19/06,11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Not Met Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the J commencement of work; 10/23/2006 12/19/06,11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Not Met Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; . Print Date: 01/18/2007 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 • FLD2006-09053 635 MANDALAY AVE Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 10/23/2006 12/19/06,11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Not Met Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 685 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 685 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (685 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 10/23/2006 12/19/06,11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Not Met J Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 10/23/2006 / 12/19/06,11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Not Met Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 11/28/2006 / 12/20/06 & 11/28/06 - WW Not Met J Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any I permits; 11/28/2006 J 12/20/06 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 12/7/06 - WW At the DRC meeting there was discussion regarding requiring this prior to issuance of any building permit. Renee Ruggiero had discussions with Carmen Killian and it is unclear if they can take out the monitoring wells. 11/28/06 - WW There are four monitoring wells shown on the survey (they have been removed from the site plan). Since three of these are under the proposed building, what is proposed with these existing monitoring wells (being removed or must stay)? Unclear as to what the response to this comment I for the 11/2/06 DRC means (#16). 11/29/2006 / 12/20/06 - WW Not Met vvv Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 11/29/06 - WW New parking spaces and landscape islands within Mandalay Avenue: a. Applicant to construct at their expense; b. A right-of-way use permit will be required prior to the the issuance of any permits, which will include approval of landscaping within these islands acceptable to the City Engineer; c. The City will erect signage limiting the time for parking within these spaces; d. Provide one cabbage palm in the terminal island at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way with shrubs to fill the island; e. Provide a curb radius on the northwest corner of the interior island; f. Provide three cabbage palms in the interior island on the north side of the site within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way with shrubs to fill; g. Provide irrigation to both of these landscape islands; and h. Shubbery will need to be maintained not to exceed 30-inches. 12/04/2006 1/18/07 - WW Not Met Still need to provide an analysis to the Design Guidelines, starting on Page 56 of Beach by Design. CaseConditons Print Date: 01/18/2007 Page 2 of 3 FLD2006-09053 635 MANDALAY AVE Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/20/06 - WW Still need to provide. What I am referring to is starting on Page 56 of Beach by Design, not the Old Florida District requirements. You did refer to containing more than 60 percent windows and ornamentation. I need specific numbers per elevation of the building. 12/4/06 - WW Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines, including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). CaseConditons Print Date: 01/18/2007 Page 3 of 3 r • 2/14/07 Mixed Use Calculation - 635 Mandalay Avenue A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR =1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR ..................................................................1.0 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion .....................x 1,253 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building ......= 1,253 sf 4. Lot area ....................................................................... 12,218.56 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) .................................. 1,253 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units..= 10,965 sf 7. Divide #A6 .................................................................... 10,965 sf 8. Land area in an acre .........................................................- 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage .................................................................= 0.2517 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage ........................................................ 0.2517 acres 11. Maximum density .............................................................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ............................ = 7 du * 0 Wells, Wayne From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wayne, Approval conditions: Rice, Scott Monday, December 18, 2006 10:37 AM Wells, Wayne Watkins, Sherry FLD2006-09053 - 635 Mandalay Prior to building permit, provide minimum radius of 30-feet at the Royal Way and Mandalay Avenue intersection in accordance with City Index 106. Prior to building permit, a ramp shall be designed to connect the proposed aisle adjacent the handicap parking space along Mandalay Avenue and any conflicts with other structures in the right-of-way shall be resolved. A Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director 727-562-4781 i ?,%_ 0 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 10:35 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members Cc: Sullivan, Robert "Scott" Subject: RE: RESUBMITTALS FOR THE CDB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 635 Mandalay-No Issues. 300 Hamden-No Issues. 205 Belcher-Scott Sullivan needs to review this case. 19135 US 19-Updated conditions. 1202 Sunset-No Issues. 490 Mandalay-No Issues. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:01 PM To: DRC Members Subject: FW: RESUBM11 TALS FOR THE CDB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 Importance: High 7. FLD2006-10057 490 MANDALAY AVE PLANNER: WAYNE WELLS SO SORRY I FORGOT THIS IN MY EMAIL A FEW MINUTES AGO. Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 shemj.watkins@myclearzvater.com -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:38 PM To: DRC Members Subject: RESUBMITTALS FOR THE CDB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 16, 2007, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2006-09053 2. FLD2006-10054 3. FLD2006-10058 4. FLD2006-09052 5. FLD2006-10058 6.FLD2006-06038 635 Mandalay Avenue 300 Hamden Drive 205 N Belcher Road 19135 US 19 205 N Belcher Road 1202 Sunset Dr Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner John Schoditer Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner John Schoditer I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12 :00 pm on Tuesday, December 19, 2006. THANK YOU, i -S Shemj L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry. watkins @mycleanvater. coin • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:01 PM To: DRC Members Subject: FW: RESUBMITTALS FOR THE CDB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 Importance: High 7. FLD2006-10057 490 MANDALAY AVE PLANNER: WAYNE WELLS SO SORRY I FORGOT THIS IN MY EMAIL A FEW MINUTES AGO. Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins@ntyclearivater.com -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:38 PM To: DRC Members Subject: RESUBMITTALS FOR THE COB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 16, 2007, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2006-09053 635 Mandalay Avenue 2. FLD2006-10054 300 Hamden Drive 3. FLD2006-10058 205 N Belcher Road 4. FLD2006-09052 19135 US 19 5. FLD2006-10058 205 N Belcher Road 6.FLD2006-06038 1202 Sunset Dr Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner John Schodlter Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner John Schodlter I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, December 19,2006. THANK YOU, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins@myclear7vater.com • • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Doherty, Steve Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Wayne, I am not sure how best to handle this. When this code amendment was proposed Engineering did not endorse it. There are several concerns including: 1. We already have a requirement for a 20'x 20' sight triangle. This requirement has been applied with logic - The Boiling Pot was a good example one parking space was deleted and another space allowed. 2. Two different scenarios occur if the parking is parallel to the street versus perpendicular to the street. Strictly enforced, no portion of any space could be within 20- or 40-feet of the ROW. This has a significant impact upon a lot with spaces perpendicular to the ROW. 3. The requirement provides no opportunity for logic or interpretation - volume of traffic on the adjacent street could impact a decision - B, C , D or E Streets. For now the comment should come from Planning. We need to work through some issues on this. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 7:30 AM To: Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Patni, Himanshu; Thompson, Neil Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Steve/Scott - With the adoption by City Council of Ordinance 7631-06 on November 2, 2009, is it Traffic Engineering or Planning's responsibility to enforce the new provisions of Section 3-1406, Off-Street loading and vehicle stacking distances. I have added under Zoning for the above case noncompliance with Section 3-1406.B.2, as follows: "Proposal does not meet the new Code requirement of Section 3-1406.B.2 for the minimum stacking distance between the front property line and the first parking space of 20 feet." Is this more appropriate under Traffic Engineering? I am trying to send out Draft DRC comments mid-morning. Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:07 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2006-09053 Parking Study Tiffany Terrace Please see my conditions for Parking Study review in Tide Mark. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Traffic Operations Division Phone: (727)562-4775 Fax: (727)562-4755 bennett.elbo@myclearwater.com • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:58 PM To: Rice, Scott Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Thanks for your insight. -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Doherty, Steve Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Wayne, I am not sure how best to handle this. When this code amendment was proposed Engineering did not endorse it. There are several concerns including: 1. We already have a requirement for a 20'x 20' sight triangle. This requirement has been applied with logic - The Boiling Pot was a good example - one parking space was deleted and another space allowed. 2. Two different scenarios occur if the parking is parallel to the street versus perpendicular to the street. Strictly enforced, no portion of any space could be within 20- or 40-feet of the ROW. This has a significant impact upon a lot with spaces perpendicular to the ROW. 3. The requirement provides no opportunity for logic or interpretation - volume of traffic on the adjacent street could impact a decision - B, C , D or E Streets. For now the comment should come from Planning. We need to work through some issues on this. Scott -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 7:30 AM To: Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Patni, Himanshu; Thompson, Neil Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Steve/Scott - With the adoption by City Council of Ordinance 7631-06 on November 2, 2009, is it Traffic Engineering or Planning's responsibility to enforce the new provisions of Section 3-1406, Off-Street loading and vehicle stacking distances. I have added under Zoning for the above case noncompliance with Section 3-1406.B.2, as follows: "Proposal does not meet the new Code requirement of Section 3-1406.B.2 for the minimum stacking distance between the front property line and the first parking space of 20 feet." Is this more appropriate under Traffic Engineering? I am trying to send out Draft DRC comments mid-morning. Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:25 AM To: Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Bob - If you would check, 635 Mandalay is a vacant site that is on this Thursday DRC agenda for a proposed mixed use project, just the same as 490 Mandalay. Jason is long gone for this project, unless he came back this week. -----Original Message----- From: Maran, Robert (Bob) Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:34 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue It was Jason Kinney and I think the building permit has been issued! -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:02 AM To: Maran, Robert (Bob) Cc: Vo, Phuong; Doherty, Steve Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue So...is whomever that reviewed 635 Mandalay adding a similar comment to 635 Mandalay review? -----Original Message----- From: Maran, Robert (Bob) Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:52 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Vo, Phuong; Doherty, Steve Subject: RE: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Wayne, I did not review the other site, but if I did I would have made the same comment as I did on this site. Phuong and I spent some time reviewing this site out at the location and as a result of my comment, I think they will have to pull out the city sidewalk and regrade it to meet the new higher floor slab that is needed. I stand by my comment. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 7:04 PM To: Doherty, Steve Cc: Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Steve - As part of the review of FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue, Stormwater Engineering has included the following comment: The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations 1' above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be 1 foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. I have looked at 635 Mandalay Avenue, which does not have any finished floor grades for the ground floor retail units, and there is not a similar comment on this case. These two cases are for the same type use (mixed use of retail sales and attached dwellings) within blocks of each other. We need to be consistent. If additional commentneed to be added for 635 Mandalay Avenue. can they be added by 10 am? Note: You were also going to look at the issue of adding parking onto Mandalay Avenue with Tim Kurtz and any concerns there. Have you checked out the street sweeping also? Wayne 1:45 pm 0 Kiv ) Case Number: FLD2006-0903 -- 635 MANDALAY AVE Owner(s): Don R Whitehurst 170007006 1801 Se Us Highway 19 Crystal River, F134429 ?? TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email , Representative: Housh Ghovaee AmAk A16 vrmm" 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: renee@northsideengineering.com Location: 0.28 acres located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,249 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 65 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 11/2/06: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Scott Rice, Tom Glenn, Catherine Porter; 12/7106: Wells, Thompson,Doherty,Keller,Rice Applicant: 11/2/06: Renee Ruggiero,Patti Stough,Danny Patel; 12/7/06: Ruggiero,Stough,Ed Smoltz The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 30 Prior to CDB: 1. Revise plan to indicate Fire Department Connection will be installed no closer than 15 feet from the front of the building. 2. Revise plan to indicate the Fire Hydrant Assembly will be located no further than 40 feet from the Fire Department Connection. 3. Turning radii at all intersections shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #106. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Move Fire Department Connection to within 40-feet of existing Fire Hydrant on Royal Way. 2. Install the new Fire Hydrant Assembly at the north end of the property on Mandalay Avenue. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Arrange with Parking Facilites Manager to relocate any existing parking meters that may be located along Mandalay Avenue and to add additional meters for proposed additional on-street parking spaces. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . Provide jusification for use of a vault for stormwater treatment in accordance with Page 7 of the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual. Fire: 1 , Plan does not show if the parking garage is open or closed. Please provide as to which it will be.Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 2. Plan has the Fire Department Connection too close to the building, must be 15' off of the building bringing it closer to Mandalay. The existing fire hydrant can be used for the Fire Department Connection and the second Fire Hydrant being added can be placed at the north end of this project. Revise PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Plan is unclear as to my exiting from the upper Widow Walk, provide details as to my exiting must have (two-means) Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 4. Exits do not go directly to a public way. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: 1 No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . Due to the location of the electric meters on the rear of the building next to the exit door, does the landscaping need to be revised to accommodate meter readers? 2. Sheet L1.1 - Landscape Table indicates 89 GA, yet I only count 68. 3 . Sheet L1.1 - Southwest side of the building indicates 21 VA, yet there are no VA in the Landscape Table. Also, northeast side of the building has two IH indications. If you count the 20 IH, this is consistent with the numbers in the Landscape Table. Potentially, the 21 IH should be 21 GA, as then counting it would add up to 89 GA as the Landscape Table indicates. Revise. 4. Need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application for the reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet. Include in your request. Parks and Recreation: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 31 • • 1 , 10/10/06 - FLD2006-09053 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. 2. The Public Art and Design Impact Fee may be due and payable on this project prior to issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 , The following shall be addressed prior to review by CDB: 1. Sheet C3.1 - Section B-B indicates swale width of 3-feet but based on dimensions on Sheet A-1 building is located only 1.9 feet from the side property line. Redesign the side swale to direct runoff into the vault.(See item # 3 below) Prior to issuance of a building permit: 2. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 3. The redesigned north swale is too small to convey the runoff. It is recommended that an oversized gutter and downspout be installed on the north roof to direct all runoff to the vault and not to Mandalay Avenue. 4. Show that the finished floor elevation of the retail section meets the minimum standard of one foot above the crown of the adjacent road and also meets all FEMA flood requirements. Elevations to be on NAVD 88 datum. Solid Waste: I , With the addition of retail space and no space in trash room, an additional dumpster will be required. Traffic Engineering: 1 , Prior to CDB address the following conditions: Parking Study Conditions. 1. Remove Exhibit A Trip Generation Report. Trip generation calculations indicate more parking spaces are needed versus the City's minimum code requirement. 2. Remove Exhibit E. The cost to park in a parking space does not justify a reduction in parking spaces for this project. 3. Revise Exhibit G to reflect Exhibit F. The Total Availability Column is too high. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 32 1 1 . 11/28/06 & 10/23/6 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 2. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title document be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 4. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Dimension the width of roof overhangs on all floors. 5 . 11/28/06 - WW Comment below is still applicable. Stepbacks are NOT shown on the elevations (per response sheet). Additionally, Sheet A-1 indicates there is a 6-0" stepback on the first floor (to the second floor) and a 6-0" stepback on the third floor (to the fourth floor). However, if the elevations are drawn to scale (3/32 = 1'), the stepback on the first floor is 6.25 feet and the stepback on the third floor is approximately 7.25 feet. Which is correct? 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Indicate the distance in feet of the building stepbacks on the Front Elevation (remove from floor plans on Sheet A-1 as it is confusing). 6. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. 11/27/06 - WW If the a/c units are to be on unit balconies, show their locations on Sheet A-1 (including the commercial unit a/c locations on the roof of the ground floor tenant spaces). 10/23/06 - WW Show location of exterior a/c units and required screening. 9. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 685 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 685 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (685 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 11 . 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 33 • 12. 11/28/06 - WW • Response sheet indicates that Sheet C-1 has been amended; however, I don't see any change. Comment is still applicable. 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Indicate the proposed color scheme by writing the names of the colors on the applicable portions of the building. The 8.5"x11" colored plans appear inconsistent as it relates to the first floor colors. It appears that "white mountain" is indicated on the ground floor and "portions" of the first floor, while "tender touch" is for the second through fifth floors. Indicate on all elevations for clarity. 13. 11/28/06 - WW Response is inadequate. Provide the documentation requested, so that I can confirm such with a Building Plans Reviewer. 10/23/06 - WW With the building being proposed less than two feet from the north property line, provide documentation that windows on the north side' of the first floor and second floor are permitted as shown per the Building/Fire Code. If not permitted, revise the elevation and floor plan drawings. 14. 11/28/06 - WW Other than potentially the windows in the commercial units on the ground floor, single pane large windows do not give any character to the building. Is it possible to have multi-paned windows, potentially also for the commercial units? Will the required egress windows look any different than the inoperable windows (double hung, etc.)? 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Are all of the windows intended to be inoperable large pane windows, or will the windows be multi-paned and some operable? If they are intended to be multi-paned, show as such. 15. Sheet A-1 - Floor plans indicate an elevator that is accessed from the lobby on the ground floor and then opens on either side into one or the other unit on each floor. However, a widow's walk is proposed on the fifth floor and it is unclear how it is accessed, since the doors for the ground floor and floors 1 - 4 open on opposite sides than what would be necessary for the widow's walk and there is no stair access. Unclear of the purpose/need for the widow's walk. 16. Sheet A-1 - Remove heavy line from concrete area on the east side of the building on the garage/ground level, as it appears as building (not just concrete). 17. Sheet A-1 - Show the location of all windows and doors on the floor plans, including to trash chute. Ensure all window and door locations are shown properly on the building elevations on Sheet C-1. 18. Sheet C-1 - Unclear why there is a "overhead metal roll up door" on the ground floor on the north elevation. Revise/advise. 19. Sheet C-1 - Dimensions on the Front Elevation are confusing as to what they relate to, especially the top dimension of 63'-4" and the 53'-4" dimension below. Provide written information on the Front Elevation as to what the dimension relates to (first floor, second floor, etc.). Additionally, if the elevations are drawn to scale, the building height only scales at 60 feet from BFE (not 65 feet). If only 60 feet, revise the drawing, Sheet C1.1 and the application material. 20. Ground floor plan indicates (as well as civil plans) that the stairwell is at a zero front setback. Based on the elevations on Sheet C-1, it appears that above BFE the building (stairwell) protrudes 8 - 9 inches into the right-of-way of Mandalay Avenue. At the facia line of the first floor and continuing to the fifth floor, it appears that this stairwell protrudes an additional six inches beyond the 8 - 9 inches mentioned earlier. Is this correct, that you are proposing this stairwell to extend into the right-of-way? Section 3-908.A.1 permits certain encroachments, but not of this nature (actual building), but when it does, it requires a clearance of nine feet over grade be maintained (this proposal does not). Additionally, the floor plans appear to have been cut off on the front elevation as to roof and columns. Please check and revise accordingly. Finally, based on the floor plans and elevations, the pitched roof over the first floor balconies on either side of the stairwell appears to extend in front of the stairwell on the front elevation, which is unclear as to such based on the floor plans and the north and south elevations. Revise/advise. 21 . Provide a typical floor plan of a unit layout. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 34 r 22. Sheet C-1 -East Elevation -Unclear why the southern window on the first floor doesn't lineup with similar windows on the second and third floors, much like the windows on the northern units. Additionally, unclear why the window depictions are not drawn consistently for all floors. 23 . Sheet C2.1 and A-1 - Unclear why there are two doorways into the northern retail/commercial tenant space of only 711 square feet. Advise/eliminate one doorway. 24. Sheet C2.1 - Plan indicates a north side setback of 2.1 feet, yet Sheet A-1 indicates 1.83 feet. Which is correct? Revise appropriate sheet. 25 . Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 26. 12/7/06 - WW At the DRC meeting there was discussion regarding requiring this prior to issuance of any building permit. Renee Ruggiero had discussions with Carmen Killian and it is unclear if they can take out the monitoring wells. 11/28/06 - WW There are four monitoring wells shown on the survey (they have been removed from the site plan). Since three of these are under the proposed building, what is proposed with these existing monitoring wells (being removed or must stay)? Unclear as to what the response to this comment for the 11/2/06 DRC means (#16). 27. Since the trash room is only large enough for one small rolling dumpster, and the residential units have a trash chute, where will the retail/commercial tenant units place their trash (in the same small dumpster)? If the retail/commercial tenants will utilize the same trash room, how do the retail/commercial tenants get into it (raise the overhead door)? How do the retail/commercial tenant get to the trash room, since they have no rear exits? 28. Sheet A-1 - Indicate "hot tub" on Units 101/102, similar to all other floors. Comment regarding the fact that having the hot tubs on the balconies facing Mandalay Avenue will not have any privacy, due to picket aluminum railings, is still applicable. 29. Sheet A-1 - Garage/Ground floor - Unclear what the heavy line (which generally indicates a wall) in a "L" shape is next to Royal Way. Advise/revise. 30. Sheet A-1 - Show the mansard-type roof on the fourth floor plan, as shown on the elevations on Sheet C-1. 31 . Site plan Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 and Garage/Ground Level plan on Sheet A-1 appear to indicate walls screening parking spaces under the building in all locations except on the east side north of the trash room. The building elevations on Sheet C-1 appear to also indicate such, except for the East Elevation, which appears to indicate a six-foot high wall along the entire east side. If such is correct, revise Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1, C-1 and A-1 to indicate this six-foot high wall along the east side of the building, with "open" above the wall. Dimension the height of the wall on the east side. Response sheet indicates the wall on the east side is to be four feet high, but the east elevation scales to six feet. Additionally, the response sheet indicates a roll-up security door is to be provided on the south side of the building at the entrance. No such roll-up door is indicated on any of the plans. Revise to indicate such. What will it look like? Finally, since ADA requirements require 8'-2" clearance for handicap accessibility, will such roll-up door have sufficient clearance for such. This has become a major issue on other projects, where ADA clearance requirements are not being met during construction drawing/permitting and actual construction phases. 32. With no dimensions giving the overall width (north to south; east to west) of the building provided on Sheet A-1, there is nothing apparent on the drawings to indicate that the first floor on the north side is indented four feet from the ground floor wall. Plans do not provide sufficient information as to where floors are stacked or indented at any level. Provide dimensions giving the overall width (north to south; east to west) on Sheet A-1, also showing dashed lines where the unit wall is above or below, or provide other graphic depictions as to how the floors fit together relative to stacking or indenting. Ensure the buidling elevations are coordinated with such. Additionally, if the building is indented four feet on the north side for Unit 102, then the floor plan for this unit would show the columns farther out and showing the roof of the parking garage (see elevations on Sheet C-1). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 35 9 • 33 . Sheet C-1 - North and South Elevations -There is what appears a wall extending beyond the column on the garage/ground level on the east side of the building. The garage/ground level plan on Sheet A-1 does not show any such projecting wall. Advise/revise. 34. Sheet C-1 - Note #2 states that the parking garage height is 10'-0" clear. This is not correct, as it appears that the ground floor to first floor is 10'-8" (assuming a floor slab depth of eight inches), which leaves 10 feet. However, there will be lighting, fire sprinklers and piping under the first floor slab that will reduce this "clear" hieght. Additionally, there appears to be an overhead door proposed on the south side. The elevations on Sheet C-1 don't show the location of the overhead door, nor the opening height. ADA Code requires a clear height of 8'-2". Revise. 35 . Sheet C3.1 - Section B-B indicates the area between the building and north property line to be sodded. Sheet L1.1 indicates lava rock. Which is correct? Provide a dimension on Section B-B as to the proposed building setback to the north property line. 36. Sheet C1.1 - Under the parking calculations at the bottom of the Site Data table, it states "(see shared parking diagram)". Include such shared parking diagram on this sheet. 37 . Required parking is 22 spaces. Only 18 off-street parking spaces are being provided. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted justifying the reduction to required parking. Who prepared this study? Who with the City did you have a scoping meeting with? 38 . Exhibit A - Description of Request - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. Revise. 39. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. It should also be stated that the proposal is consistent with the new Old Florida District requirements for mixed use on Mandalay Avenue. Revise. 40. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. You are asking for a parking reduction. Need to address from a traffic congestion standpoint. Revise. 41 . Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - a. Unclear as to what is meant by "millennium mediterranean design". Elaborate. b. You state that the developers are proposing "high quality" and colorful plantings. Based on Sheet L1.1, the proposed plantings are meeting Code requirements, so I am unclear as to "high quality". c. This is not a residential development; it is a mixed use development. d. This property is located in the Old Florida District, not the North Florida District. e. You have not indicated consistency with limited retail/commercial existing along Mandalay Avenue and how this is required along Mandalay Avenue under the new Old Florida District requirements, nor with how the retail/commercial is moved forward close to the front of the property. 42. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - a. Unclear as to what is meant by "seven depths of plantings". b. Need to address hours of operation impacts. c. From a visual aspect, while the building is proposed at a height of "60" feet, the building is stepped back for a majority of the building whereby the height visually would not produce significant visual impacts for pedestrians and motorists along Mandalay Avenue. 43. Since mixed use is not listed in the Tourist District, you have properly filed a Flexible Development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. You have responded to the Flexibility criteria for "attached dwellings". Different, need to provide responses to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. 44. New parking spaces and landscape islands within Mandalay Avenue: a. Applicant to construct at their expense; b. A right-of-way use permit will be required prior to the the issuance of any permits, which will include approval of landscaping within these islands acceptable to the City Engineer; c. The City will erect signage limiting the time for parking within these spaces; d. Provide one cabbage palm in the terminal island at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way with shrubs to fill the island; e. Provide a curb radius on the northwest comer of the interior island; f. Provide three cabbage palms in the interior island on the north side of the site within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way with shrubs to fill; g. Provide irrigation to both of these landscape islands; and h. Shubbery will need to be maintained not to exceed 30-inches. 45 . Need to address how you are complying with the new Old Florida District requirements. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 36 0 0 46. Provide the finished floor elevation for the retail units on the ground floor. Ensure ADA accessibility to these retail units. Provide proposed grades for the sidewalk within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way and its relationship to pavement grades of Mandalay Avenue. 47. Proposal does not meet the new Code requirement of Section 3-1406.B.2 for the minimum stacking distance between the front property line and the first parking space of 20 feet. 48. Need to include on Sheet C1.1 the mixed use calculation (being provided to you via email). 49. Ground-level retail will be required to be floodproofed. With this design, ensure final design will incorporated floodproofing measures. If such design needs to change to accommodate floodproofmg, show such change now. 50. Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines, including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 1/16/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 12/14/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 37 1.45 pm Case Number: FLD2006-090 - 635 MANDALAY AVE Owner(s): Don R Whitehurst . ?. 1801 Se Us Highway 19 Crystal River, F134429 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email . Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: renee@northsideengineering.com Location: 0.28 acres located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,249 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 65 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamuzphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 11/2/06: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Scott Rice, Tom Glenn, Catherine Porter; 12/7/06: Applicant: 11/2/06: Renee Ruggiero, Patti Stough, Danny Patel; 12/7/06: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 30 Prior to CDB: • • 1. Revise plan to indicate Fire Department Connection will be installed no closer than 15 feet from the front of the building. 2. Revise plan to indicate the Fire Hydrant Assembly will be located no further than 40 feet from the Fire Department Connection. 3. Turning radii at all intersections shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #106. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Move Fire Department Connection to within 40-feet of existing Fire Hydrant on Royal Way. 2. Install the new Fire Hydrant Assembly at the north end of the property on Mandalay Avenue. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Arrange with Parking Facilites Manager to relocate any existing parking meters that may be located along Mandalay Avenue and to add additional meters for proposed additional on-street parking spaces. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Provide jusification for use of a vault for stormwater treatment in accordance with Page 7 of the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual. Fire: 1 . Plan does not show if the parking garage is open or closed. Please provide as to which it will be.Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 2. Plan has the Fire Department Connection too close to the building, must be 15' off of the building bringing it closer to Mandalay. The existing fire hydrant can be used for the Fire Department Connection and the second Fire Hydrant being added can be placed at the north end of this project. Revise PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Plan is unclear as to my exiting from the upper Widow Walk, provide details as to my exiting must have (two-means) Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 4. Exits do not go directly to a public way. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 , Due to the location of the electric meters on the rear of the building next to the exit door, does the landscaping need to be revised to accommodate meter readers? 2. Sheet L1.1 - Landscape Table indicates 89 GA, yet I only count 68. 3. Sheet L1.1 - Southwest side of the building indicates 21 VA, yet there are no VA in the Landscape Table. Also, northeast side of the building has two IH indications. If you count the 20 IH, this is consistent with the numbers in the Landscape Table. Potentially, the 21 IH should be 21 GA, as then counting it would add up to 89 GA as the Landscape Table indicates. Revise. 4. Need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application for the reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet. Include in your request. Parks and Recreation: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 31 10/10/06 - FLD2006-09053 • Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. The Public Art and Design Impact Fee may be due and payable on this project prior to issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to review by CDB: 1. Sheet C3.1 - Section B-B indicates swale width of 3-feet but based on dimensions on Sheet A-I building is located only 1.9 feet from the side property line. Redesign the side Swale to direct runoff into the vault.(See item # 3 below) Prior to issuance of a building permit: 2. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 3. The redesigned north swale is too small to convey the runoff. It is recommended that an oversized gutter and downspout be installed on the north roof to direct all runoff to the vault and not to Mandalay Avenue. 4. Show that the finished floor elevation of the retail section meets the minimum standard of one foot above the crown of the adjacent road and also meets all FEMA flood requirements. Elevations to be on NAVD 88 datum. Solid Waste: 1 , With the addition of retail space and no space in trash room, an additional dumpster will be required. Traffic Engineering: 1 , Prior to CDB address the following conditions: Parking Study Conditions. 1. Remove Exhibit A Trip Generation Report. Trip generation calculations indicate more parking spaces are needed versus the City's minimum code requirement. 2. Remove Exhibit E. The cost to park in a parking space does not justify a reduction in parking spaces for this project. 3. Revise Exhibit G to reflect Exhibit F. The Total Availability Column is too high. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 32 1 . 11/28/06 & 10/23/66- WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 2. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title document be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3 . 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 4. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Dimension the width of roof overhangs on all floors. 5. 11/28/06 - WW Comment below is still applicable. Stepbacks are NOT shown on the elevations (per response sheet). Additionally, Sheet A-1 indicates there is a 6-0" stepback on the first floor (to the second floor) and a 6-0" stepback on the third floor (to the fourth floor). However, if the elevations are drawn to scale (3/32 = 1'), the stepback on the first floor is 6.25 feet and the stepback on the third floor is approximately 7.25 feet. Which is correct? 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Indicate the distance in feet of the building Stepbacks on the Front Elevation (remove from floor plans on Sheet A-1 as it is confusing). 6. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8 . 11/27/06 - WW If the a/c units are to be on unit balconies, show their locations on Sheet A-1 (including the commercial unit a/c locations on the roof of the ground floor tenant spaces). 10/23/06 - WW Show location of exterior a/c units and required screening. 9. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 685 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 685 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (685 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 11 . 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 33 12. 11/28/06 - WW • Response sheet indicates that Sheet C-1 has been amended; however, I don't see any change. Comment is still applicable. 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Indicate the proposed color scheme by writing the names of the colors on the applicable portions of the building. The 8.5"x11" colored plans appear inconsistent as it relates to the first floor colors. It appears that "white mountain" is indicated on the ground floor and "portions" of the first floor, while "tender touch" is for the second through fifth floors. Indicate on all elevations for clarity. 13. 11/28/06 - WW Response is inadequate. Provide the documentation requested, so that I can confirm such with a Building Plans Reviewer. 10/23/06 - WW With the building being proposed less than two feet from the north property line, provide documentation that windows on the north side of the first floor and second floor are permitted as shown per the Building/Fire Code. If not permitted, revise the elevation and floor plan drawings. 14. 11/28/06 - WW Other than potentially the windows in the commercial units on the ground floor, single pane large windows do not give any character to the building. Is it possible to have multi-paned windows, potentially also for the commercial units? Will the required egress windows look any different than the inoperable windows (double hung, etc.)? 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Are all of the windows intended to be inoperable large pane windows, or will the windows be multi-paned and some operable? If they are intended to be multi-paned, show as such. 15. Sheet A-1 - Floor plans indicate an elevator that is accessed from the lobby on the ground floor and then opens on either side into one or the other unit on each floor. However, a widow's walk is proposed on the fifth floor and it is unclear how it is accessed, since the doors for the ground floor and floors 1 - 4 open on opposite sides than what would be necessary for the widow's walk and there is no stair access. Unclear of the purpose/need for the widow's walk. 16. Sheet A-1 - Remove heavy line from concrete area on the east side of the building on the garage/ground level, as it appears as building (not just concrete). 17. Sheet A-1 - Show the location of all windows and doors on the floor plans, including to trash chute. Ensure all window and door locations are shown properly on the building elevations on Sheet C-1. 18. Sheet C-1 - Unclear why there is a "overhead metal roll up door" on the ground floor on the north elevation. Revise/advise. 19. Sheet C-1 - Dimensions on the Front Elevation are confusing as to what they relate to, especially the top dimension of 63'-4" and the 53'-4" dimension below. Provide written information on the Front Elevation as to what the dimension relates to (first floor, second floor, etc.). Additionally, if the elevations are drawn to scale, the building height only scales at 60 feet from BFE (not 65 feet). If only 60 feet, revise the drawing, Sheet C1.1 and the application material. 20. Ground floor plan indicates (as well as civil plans) that the stairwell is at a zero front setback. Based on the elevations on Sheet C-l, it appears that above BFE the building (stairwell) protrudes 8 - 9 inches into the right-of-way of Mandalay Avenue. At the facia line of the first floor and continuing to the fifth floor, it appears that this stairwell protrudes an additional six inches beyond the 8 - 9 inches mentioned earlier. Is this correct, that you are proposing this stairwell to extend into the right-of-way? Section 3-908.A.1 permits certain encroachments, but not of this nature (actual building), but when it does, it requires a clearance of nine feet over grade be maintained (this proposal does not). Additionally, the floor plans appear to have been cut off on the front elevation as to roof and columns. Please check and revise accordingly. Finally, based on the floor plans and elevations, the pitched roof over the first floor balconies on either side of the stairwell appears to extend in front of the stairwell on the front elevation, which is unclear as to such based on the floor plans and the north and south elevations. Revise/advise. 21 . Provide a typical floor plan of a unit layout. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 34 22. Sheet C-1 - East Elevation - Unclear why the southern window on the first floor doesn't line up with similar windows on the second and third floors, much like the windows on the northern units. Additionally, unclear why the window depictions are not drawn consistently for all floors. 23 . Sheet C2.1 and A-1 - Unclear why there are two doorways into the northern retail/commercial tenant space of only 711 square feet. Advise/eliminate one doorway. 24. Sheet C2.1 - Plan indicates a north side setback of 2.1 feet, yet Sheet A-1 indicates 1.83 feet. Which is correct? Revise appropriate sheet. 25. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 26. There are four monitoring wells shown on the survey (they have been removed from the site plan). Since three of these are under the proposed building, what is proposed with these existing monitoring wells (being removed or must stay)? Unclear as to what the response to this comment for the 11/2/06 DRC means (#16). 27. Since the trash room is only large enough for one small rolling dumpster, and the residential units have a trash chute, where will the retail/commercial tenant units place their trash (in the same small dumpster)? If the retail/commercial tenants will utilize the same trash room, how do the retail/commercial tenants get into it (raise the overhead door)? How do the retail/commercial tenant get to the trash room, since they have no rear exits? 28. Sheet A-1 - Indicate "hot tub" on Units 101/102, similar to all other floors. Comment regarding the fact that having the hot tubs on the balconies facing Mandalay Avenue will not have any privacy, due to picket aluminum railings, is still applicable. 29. Sheet A-1 - Garage/Ground floor - Unclear what the heavy line (which generally indicates a wall) in a "L" shape is next to Royal Way. Advise/revise. 30. Sheet A-1 - Show the mansard-type roof on the fourth floor plan, as shown on the elevations on Sheet C-1. 31 . Site plan Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 and Garage/Ground Level plan on Sheet A-1 appear to indicate walls screening parking spaces under the building in all locations except on the east side north of the trash room. The building elevations on Sheet C-1 appear to also indicate such, except for the East Elevation, which appears to indicate a six-foot high wall along the entire east side. If such is correct, revise Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1, C-1 and A-1 to indicate this six-foot high wall along the east side of the building, with "open" above the wall. Dimension the height of the wall on the east side. Response sheet indicates the wall on the east side is to be four feet high, but the east elevation scales to six feet. Additionally, the response sheet indicates a roll-up security door is to be provided on the south side of the building at the entrance. No such roll-up door is indicated on any of the plans. Revise to indicate such. What will it look like? Finally, since ADA requirements require 8'-2" clearance for handicap accessibility, will such roll-up door have sufficient clearance for such. This has become a major issue on other projects, where ADA clearance requirements are not being met during construction drawing/permitting and actual construction phases. 32. With no dimensions giving the overall width (north to south; east to west) of the building provided on Sheet A-1, there is nothing apparent on the drawings to indicate that the first floor on the north side is indented four feet from the ground floor wall. Plans do not provide sufficient information as to where floors ate stacked or indented at any level. Provide dimensions giving the overall width (north to south; east to west) on Sheet A-1, also showing dashed lines where the unit wall is above or below, or provide other graphic depictions as to how the floors fit together relative to stacking or indenting. Ensure the buidling elevations are coordinated with such. Additionally, if the building is indented four feet on the north side for Unit 102, then the floor plan for this unit would show the columns farther out and showing the roof of the parking garage (see elevations on Sheet C-1). 33 . Sheet C-1 - North and South Elevations - There is what appears a wall extending beyond the column on the garage/ground level on the east side of the building. The garage/ground level plan on Sheet A-1 does not show any such projecting wall. Advise/revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 35 34. Sheet C-1 - Note 4 states that the parking garage height is 10'-0" c# This is not correct, as it appears that the ground floor to first floor is 10'-8" (assuming a floor slab depth of eight inches), which leaves 10 feet. However, there will be lighting, fire sprinklers and piping under the first floor slab that will reduce this "clear" hieght. Additionally, there appears to be an overhead door proposed on the south side. The elevations on Sheet C-1 don't show the location of the overhead door, nor the opening height. ADA Code requires a clear height of 8'-2". Revise. 35 . Sheet C3.1 - Section B-B indicates the area between the building and north property line to be sodded. Sheet L1.1 indicates lava rock. Which is correct? Provide a dimension on Section B-B as to the proposed building setback to the north property line. 36. Sheet C 1.1 - Under the parking calculations at the bottom of the Site Data table, it states "(see shared parking diagram)". Include such shared parking diagram on this sheet. 37. Required parking is 22 spaces. Only 18 off-street parking spaces are being provided. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted justifying the reduction to required parking. Who prepared this study? Who with the City did you have a scoping meeting with? 38 . Exhibit A - Description of Request - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. Revise. 39. Response to General Applicability criteria #1 - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. It should also be stated that the proposal is consistent with the new Old Florida District requirements for mixed use on Mandalay Avenue. Revise. 40. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. You are asking for a parking reduction. Need to address from a traffic congestion standpoint. Revise. 41 . Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - a. Unclear as to what is meant by "millennium mediterranean design". Elaborate. b. You state that the developers are proposing "high quality" and colorful plantings. Based on Sheet L1.1, the proposed plantings are meeting Code requirements, so I am unclear as to "high quality". c. This is not a residential development; it is a mixed use development. d. This property is located in the Old Florida District, not the North Florida District. e. You have not indicated consistency with limited retail/commercial existing along Mandalay Avenue and how this is required along Mandalay Avenue under the new Old Florida District requirements, nor with how the retail/commercial is moved forward close to the front of the property. 42. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - a. Unclear as to what is meant by "seven depths of plantings". b. Need to address hours of operation impacts. c. From a visual aspect, while the building is proposed at a height of "60" feet, the building is stepped back for a majority of the building whereby the height visually would not produce significant visual impacts for pedestrians and motorists along Mandalay Avenue. 43. Since mixed use is not listed in the Tourist District, you have properly filed a Flexible Development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. You have responded to the Flexibility criteria for "attached dwellings". Different, need to provide responses to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. 44. New parking spaces and landscape islands within Mandalay Avenue: a. Applicant to construct at their expense; b. A right-of-way use permit will be required prior to the the issuance of any permits, which will include approval of landscaping within these islands acceptable to the City Engineer; c. The City will erect signage limiting the time for parking within these spaces; d. Provide one cabbage palm in the terminal island at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way with shrubs to fill the island; e. Provide a curb radius on the northwest corner of the interior island; f. Provide three cabbage palms in the interior island on the north side of the site within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way with shrubs to fill; g. Provide irrigation to both of these landscape islands; and h. Shubbery will need to be maintained not to exceed 30-inches. 45. Need to address how you are complying with the new Old Florida District requirements. 46. Provide the finished floor elevation for the retail units on the ground floor. Ensure ADA accessibility to these retail units. Provide proposed grades for the sidewalk within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way and its relationship to pavement grades of Mandalay Avenue. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 36 47. Proposal does not meet the new Code requirement of Section 3-1406.B.2 for the minimum stacking distance between the front property line and the first parking space of 20 feet. 48. Need to include on Sheet C1.1 the mixed use calculation (being provided to you via email). 49. Ground-level retail will be required to be floodproofed. With this design, ensure final design will incorporated floodproofmg measures. If such design needs to change to accommodate floodproofmg, show such change now. 50. Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines, including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 1/16/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 12/14/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 37 1. P-- •45 pm Case Number: FLD2006_09053 635 MANDALAY AVE Owner(s): Don R Whitehurst ?? • ?. 1801 Se Us Highway 19 10 Crystal River, F134429 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: renee@northsideengineering.com Location: 0.28 acres located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,249 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 65 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: 11/2/06: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Scott Rice, Tom Glenn, Catherine Porter; 12/7/06: Applicant: 11/2/06: Renee Ruggiero, Patti Stough, Danny Patel; 12/7/06: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 39 • Prior to CDB: 1. Revise plan to indicate Fire Department Connection will be installed no closer than 15 feet from the front of the building. 2. Revise plan to indicate the Fire Hydrant Assembly will be located no further than 40 feet from the Fire Department Connection. 3. Turning radii at all intersections shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #106. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Move Fire Department Connection to within 40-feet of existing Fire Hydrant on Royal Way. 2. Install the new Fire Hydrant Assembly at the north end of the property on Mandalay Avenue. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Arrange with Parking Facilites Manager to relocate any existing parking meters that may be located along Mandalay Avenue and to add additional meters for proposed additional on-street parking spaces. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Provide jusification for use of a vault for stormwater treatment in accordance with Page 7 of the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual. Fire: 1 , Plan does not show if the parking garage is open or closed. Please provide as to which it will be.Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 2. Plan has the Fire Department Connection too close to the building, must be 15' off of the building bringing it closer to Mandalay. The existing fire hydrant can be used for the Fire Department Connection and the second Fire Hydrant being added can be placed at the north end of this project. Revise PRIOR TO CDB 3. Plan is unclear as to my exiting from the upper Widow Walk, provide details as to my exiting must have (two-means) Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 4. Exits do not go directly to a public way. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . Due to the location of the electric meters on the rear of the building next to the exit door, does the landscaping need to be revised to accommodate meter readers? 2. Sheet L1.1 - Landscape Table indicates 89 GA, yet I only count 68. 3 . Sheet L1.1 - Southwest side of the building indicates 21 VA, yet there are no VA in the Landscape Table. Also, northeast side of the building has two IH indications. If you count the 20 IH, this is consistent with the numbers in the Landscape Table. Potentially, the 21 IH should be 21 GA, as then counting it would add up to 89 GA as the Landscape Table indicates. Revise. 4. Need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program application for the reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet. Include in your request. Parks and Recreation: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 40 10/10/06 - FLD20?6-09053 9 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. The Public Art and Design Impact Fee may be due and payable on this project prior to issuance of building permit. This fee could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Chris Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . The following shall be addressed prior to review by CDB: 1. Sheet C3.1 - Section B-B indicates swale width of 3-feet but based on dimensions on Sheet A-1 building is located only 1.9 feet from the side property line. Redesign the side swale to direct runoff into the vault.(See item # 3 below) Prior to issuance of a building permit: 2. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. 3. The redesigned north swale is too small to convey the runoff. It is recommended that an oversized gutter and downspout be installed on the north roof to direct all runoff to the vault and not to Mandalay Avenue. 4. Show that the finished floor elevation of the retail section meets the minimum standard of one foot above the crown of the adjacent road and also meets all FEMA flood requirements. Elevations to be on NAVD 88 datum. Solid Waste: 1 , With the addition of retail space and no space in trash room, an additional dumpster will be required. Traffic Engineering: 1 . General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 41 1 . 11/28/06 & 10/23/f0- WW • Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 2. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title document be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 4. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Dimension the width of roof overhangs on all floors. 5 . 11/28/06 - WW Comment below is still applicable. Stepbacks are NOT shown on the elevations (per response sheet). Additionally, Sheet A-1 indicates there is a 6-0" stepback on the first floor (to the second floor) and a 6'-0" stepback on the third floor (to the fourth floor). However, if the elevations are drawn to scale (3/32 = 1'), the stepback on the first floor is 6.25 feet and the stepback on the third floor is approximately 7.25 feet. Which is correct? 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Indicate the distance in feet of the building stepbacks on the Front Elevation (remove from floor plans on Sheet A-1 as it is confusing). 6. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. 11/27/06 - WW If the a/c units are to be on unit balconies, show their locations on Sheet A-1 (including the commercial unit a/c locations on the roof of the ground floor tenant spaces). 10/23/06 - WW Show location of exterior a/c units and required screening. 9. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 685 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 685 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (685 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 11 . 11/28/06 & 10/23/06 - WW Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 42 12. 11/28/06 - WW • • Response sheet indicates that Sheet C-1 has been amended; however, I don't see any change. Comment is still applicable. 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Indicate the proposed color scheme by writing the names of the colors on the applicable portions of the building. The 8.5"x11" colored plans appear inconsistent as it relates to the first floor colors. It appears that "white mountain" is indicated on the ground floor and "portions" of the first floor, while "tender touch" is for the second through fifth floors. Indicate on all elevations for clarity. 13. 11/28/06 - WW Response is inadequate. Provide the documentation requested, so that I can confirm such with a Building Plans Reviewer. 10/23/06 - WW With the building being proposed less than two feet from the north property line, provide documentation that windows on the north side of the first floor and second floor are permitted as shown per the Building/Fire Code. If not permitted, revise the elevation and floor plan drawings. 14. 11/28/06 - WW Other than potentially the windows in the commercial units on the ground floor, single pane large windows do not give any character to the building. Is it possible to have multi-paned windows, potentially also for the commercial units? Will the required egress windows look any different than the inoperable windows (double hung, etc.)? 10/23/06 - WW Sheet C-1 - Are all of the windows intended to be inoperable large pane windows, or will the windows be multi-paned and some operable? If they are intended to be multi-paned, show as such. 15. Sheet A-1 - Floor plans indicate an elevator that is accessed from the lobby on the ground floor and then opens on either side into one or the other unit on each floor. However, a widow's walk is proposed on the fifth floor and it is unclear how it is accessed, since the doors for the ground floor and floors 1 - 4 open on opposite sides than what would be necessary for the widow's walk and there is no stair access. Unclear of the purpose/need for the widow's walk. 16. Sheet A-1 - Remove heavy line from concrete area on the east side of the building on the garage/ground level, as it appears as building (not just concrete). 17. Sheet A-1 - Show the location of all windows and doors on the floor plans, including to trash chute. Ensure all window and door locations are shown properly on the building elevations on Sheet C-1. 18. Sheet C-1 - Unclear why there is a "overhead metal roll up door" on the ground floor on the north elevation. Revise/advise. 19. Sheet C-1 - Dimensions on the Front Elevation are confusing as to what they relate to, especially the top dimension of 63'-4" and the 53'-4" dimension below. Provide written information on the Front Elevation as to what the dimension relates to (first floor, second floor, etc.). Additionally, if the elevations are drawn to scale, the building height only scales at 60 feet from BFE (not 65 feet). If only 60 feet, revise the drawing, Sheet C1.1 and the application material. 20. Ground floor plan indicates (as well as civil plans) that the stairwell is at a zero front setback. Based on the elevations on Sheet C-1, it appears that above BFE the building (stairwell) protrudes 8 - 9 inches into the right-of-way of Mandalay Avenue. At the facia line of the first floor and continuing to the fifth floor, it appears that this stairwell protrudes an additional six inches beyond the 8 - 9 inches mentioned earlier. Is this correct, that you are proposing this stairwell to extend into the right-of-way? Section 3-908.A.1 permits certain encroachments, but not of this nature (actual building), but when it does, it requires a clearance of nine feet over grade be maintained (this proposal does not). Additionally, the floor plans appear to have been cut off on the front elevation as to roof and columns. Please check and revise accordingly. Finally, based on the floor plans and elevations, the pitched roof over the first floor balconies on either side of the stairwell appears to extend in front of the stairwell on the front elevation, which is unclear as to such based on the floor plans and the north and south elevations. Revise/advise. 21 . Provide a typical floor plan of a unit layout. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 43 22. Sheet C-1 -East El ion -Unclear why the southern window on the first floor doesn't lineup with similar windows on the second and third floors, much like the windows on the northern units. Additionally, unclear why the window depictions are not drawn consistently for all floors. 23 . Sheet C2.1 and A-1 - Unclear why there are two doorways into the northern retail/commercial tenant space of only 711 square feet. Advise/eliminate one doorway. 24. Sheet C2.1 - Plan indicates a north side setback of 2.1 feet, yet Sheet A-1 indicates 1.83 feet. Which is correct? Revise appropriate sheet. 25 . Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 26. There are four monitoring wells shown on the survey (they have been removed from the site plan). Since three of these are under the proposed building, what is proposed with these existing monitoring wells (being removed or must stay)? Unclear as to what the response to this comment for the 11/2/06 DRC means (#16). 27. Since the trash room is only large enough for one small rolling dumpster, and the residential units have a trash chute, where will the retail/commercial tenant units place their trash (in the same small dumpster)? If the retail/commercial tenants will utilize the same trash room, how do the retail/commercial tenants get into it (raise the overhead door)? How do the retail/commercial tenant get to the trash room, since they have no rear exits? 28. Sheet A-1 - Indicate "hot tub" on Units 101/102, similar to all other floors. Comment regarding the fact that having the hot tubs on the balconies facing Mandalay Avenue will not have any privacy, due to picket aluminum railings, is still applicable. 29. Sheet A-1 - Garage/Ground floor - Unclear what the heavy line (which generally indicates a wall) in a "L" shape is next to Royal Way. Advise/revise. 30. Sheet A-1 - Show the mansard-type roof on the fourth floor plan, as shown on the elevations on Sheet C-1. 31 . Site plan Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 and Garage/Ground Level plan on Sheet A-1 appear to indicate walls screening parking spaces under the building in all locations except on the east side north of the trash room The building elevations on Sheet C-1 appear to also indicate such, except for the East Elevation, which appears to indicate a six-foot high wall along the entire east side. If such is correct, revise Sheets C2.1, C3.1, L1.1, C-1 and A-1 to indicate this six-foot high wall along the east side of the building, with "open" above the wall. Dimension the height of the wall on the east side. Response sheet indicates the wall on the east side is to be four feet high, but the east elevation scales to six feet. Additionally, the response sheet indicates a roll-up security door is to be provided on the south side of the building at the entrance. No such roll-up door is indicated on any of the plans. Revise to indicate such. What will it look like? Finally, since ADA requirements require 8'-2" clearance for handicap accessibility, will such roll-up door have sufficient clearance for such. This has become a major issue on other projects, where ADA clearance requirements are not being met during construction drawing/permitting and actual construction phases. 32. With no dimensions giving the overall width (north to south; east to west) of the building provided on Sheet A-1, there is nothing apparent on the drawings to indicate that the first floor on the north side is indented four feet from the ground floor wall. Plans do not provide sufficient information as to where floors are stacked or indented at any level. Provide dimensions giving the overall width (north to south; east to west) on Sheet A-1, also showing dashed lines where the unit wall is above or below, or provide other graphic depictions as to how the floors fit together relative to stacking or indenting. Ensure the buidling elevations are coordinated with such. Additionally, if the building is indented four feet on the north side for Unit 102, then the floor plan for this unit would show the columns farther out and showing the roof of the parking garage (see elevations on Sheet C-1). 33 . Sheet C-1 - North and South Elevations - There is what appears a wall extending beyond the column on the garage/ground level on the east side of the building. The garage/ground level plan on Sheet A-1 does not show any such projecting wall. Advise/revise. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 44 34. Sheet C-1 - Note #? states that the parking garage height is 10'-0" cle•This is not correct, as it appears that the ground floor to first floor is 10'-8" (assuming a floor slab depth of eight inches), which leaves 10 feet. However, there will be lighting, fire sprinklers and piping under the first floor slab that will reduce this "clear" hieght. Additionally, there appears to be an overhead door proposed on the south side. The elevations on Sheet C-1 don't show the location of the overhead door, nor the opening height. ADA Code requires a clear height of T-2". Revise. 35 . Sheet C3.1 - Section B-B indicates the area between the building and north property line to be sodded. Sheet L1.1 indicates lava rock. Which is correct? Provide a dimension on Section B-B as to the proposed building setback to the north property line. 36. Sheet C1.1 - Under the parking calculations at the bottom of the Site Data table, it states "(see shared parking diagram)". Include such shared parking diagram on this sheet. 37. Required parking is 22 spaces. Only 18 off-street parking spaces are being provided. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted justifying the reduction to required parking. Who prepared this study? Who with the City did you have a scoping meeting with? 38. Exhibit A - Description of Request - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. Revise. 39. Response to General Applicability criteria 41 - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. It should also be stated that the proposal is consistent with the new Old Florida District requirements for mixed use on Mandalay Avenue. Revise. 40. Response to General Applicability criteria #4 - The limited retail/commercial floor area is not "accessory" but a primary use as part of the "mixed use" proposal. You are asking for a parking reduction. Need to address from a traffic congestion standpoint. Revise. 41 . Response to General Applicability criteria #5 - a. Unclear as to what is meant by "millennium mediterranean design". Elaborate. b. You state that the developers are proposing "high quality" and colorful plantings. Based on Sheet L1.1, the proposed plantings are meeting Code requirements, so I am unclear as to "high quality". c. This is not a residential development; it is a mixed use development. d. This property is located in the Old Florida District, not the North Florida District. e. You have not indicated consistency with limited retail/commercial existing along Mandalay Avenue and how this is required along Mandalay Avenue under the new Old Florida District requirements, nor with how the retail/commercial is moved forward close to the front of the property. 42. Response to General Applicability criteria #6 - a. Unclear as to what is meant by "seven depths of plantings". b. Need to address hours of operation impacts. c. From a visual aspect, while the building is proposed at a height of "60" feet, the building is stepped back for a majority of the building whereby the height visually would not produce significant visual impacts for pedestrians and motorists along Mandalay Avenue. 43. Since mixed use is not listed in the Tourist District, you have properly filed a Flexible Development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. You have responded to the Flexibility criteria for "attached dwellings". Different, need to provide responses to the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. 44. Traffic/Parking - a. The applicant is proposing to construct 10 parking spaces on Mandalay Avenue where there are none today. These I presume we will want to meter. b. They are proposing a terminal island on Mandalay Avenue on the north side of Royal Way. Is this what we want (a terminal island)? If so, is this design ok? Do we want them to place any landscaping in the island? Irrigation? Any issues with street sweeping? c. They are proposing an interior island, basically in front of 647 Mandalay Avenue. Do we want this interior island? Would we prefer two more parking spaces? If we want the island, is this design ok? Do we want them to place any landscaping in the island? Irrigation? Any issues with street sweeping? 45. Need to address how you are complying with the new Old Florida District requirements. 46. Provide the finished floor elevation for the retail units on the ground floor. Ensure ADA accessibility to these retail units. Provide proposed grades for the sidewalk within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way and its relationship to pavement grades of Mandalay Avenue. 47. Proposal does not meet the new Code requirement of Section 3-1406.B.2 for the minimum stacking distance between the front property line and the first parking space of 20 feet. 48. Need to include on Sheet C1.1 the mixed use calculation (being provided to you via email). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 45 49. Ground-level retail `will be required to be floodproofed. With this des ri, ensure final design will incorporated floodproofing measures. If such design needs to change to accommodate floodproofmg, show such change now. 50. Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines, including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 1/16/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 12/14/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 46 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 7:30 AM To: Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Patni, Himanshu; Thompson, Neil Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Steve/Scott - With the adoption by City Council of Ordinance 7631-06 on November 2, 2009, is it Traffic Engineering or Planning's responsibility to enforce the new provisions of Section 3-1406, Off-Street loading and vehicle stacking distances. I have added under Zoning for the above case noncompliance with Section 3-1406.B.2, as follows: "Proposal does not meet the new Code requirement of Section 3-1406.B.2 for the minimum stacking distance between the front property line and the first parking space of 20 feet." Is this more appropriate under Traffic Engineering? I am trying to send out Draft DRC comments mid-morning. Wayne • C Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 7:04 PM To: Doherty, Steve Cc: Maran, Robert (Bob) Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Steve - As part of the review of FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue, Stormwater Engineering has included the following comment: The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations V above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be 1 foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. I have looked at 635 Mandalay Avenue, which does not have any finished floor grades for the ground floor retail units, and there is not a similar comment on this case. These two cases are for the same type use (mixed use of retail sales and attached dwellings) within blocks of each other. We need to be consistent. If additional comments need to be added for 635 Mandalay Avenue, can they be added by 10 am? Note: You were also going to look at the issue of adding parking onto Mandalay Avenue with Tim Kurtz and any concerns there. Have you checked out the street sweeping also? Wayne 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 1:46 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2006-09053 Wayne, just wanted to let you know that we added another comment to this project. We added a clause in regards to the Public Art ordinance and that fee possibly being due. Debbie 0 • • 11/27/06 Mixed Use Calculation - 635 Mandalay Avenue A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR =1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR ..................................................................1.0 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion .....................x 1,249 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building ......= 1,249 sf 4. Lot area ....................................................................... 12,218.56 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) .................................. 1,249 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units..= 10,969 sf 7. Divide #A6 .................................................................... 10,969 sf 8. Land area in an acre .........................................................- 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage .................................................................= 0.2518 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage ........................................................ 0.2518 acres 11. Maximum density .............................................................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ............................ = 7 du • • Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:12 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2006-09053 aerial.doc existing.doc FLD Map request location.doc zone.doc form.doc Sam Kambourolias GIS Tech. (727) 562-4769 www.myclearwater.com • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 10:31 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 635 Mandalay Avenue Sam - Attached is a map request for Cases FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 for the property at 635 Mandalay Avenue. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne FLD Map request form.doc P s s Aucu ¦ _ Ilk/ 0 ¦ ¦ K R. L a...R S T Ua> . 90 A 1e , t. t d * r I I .- P a 3 v 4.t S E t ..n o o . . ' ? ouc In. w "? war `rN J s .d ? ? wa.weo p - v er. -. r: d i j 9? - wrn , - S F , r / 1 YOM R. - ? ? ? p i J L'J K d pY1 er. m a. auaxrrA ar s 2 4 p ?- A `ate/e jJ - / -_ YL.. ur esvuruoe a -a A / 1 OS/R . 1w OS/R rorcxAwR R. p -? ` , ? L J ? oa nnam , ? rlNe _ 8 w ? A r " N_ J ~ .-- --- -- R q -.-- -.-.-.--- U Clete PREPARED 'y PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING I GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph.: (T27)5624750, Fax: (727)5264755 www.MyClearwater.com crm.cawr Puere swarm. eN. /a naaanw M rM anaer.?weer e4Age xbau AbNNrrsa'OnlErteMeM:p. erpmwf De attepree .nd uM M O+.erlo.Ml NA fM :ndewfeOdny tl1e(IM aaY ..rwva.ucadxeab we w.PP+e aeewArP/+q ev?.Pat IdreWUeNn-InvanbrY. Aa /uefe the Gry or asenvaMPWNE N W4 )sE 05iiaMNI 1'1X1/ ax 1m o S eE6WEeI1wLOleTibte WOe •Im?r Me?ewn O.uly Nmtlentlel WAR •a belunN 111 reR/Mbenlr -0brelry -rld /0A -11w, ,=a.tlnelr uHP rxae Pew omASV - u.a.a.. Pm. peiof m?a cen...ew, wn+md -nr.a?.u,,.?iapnvt,ooeee,..,,em„ OMel Apbld mreEAAeY OOrmers sPecw use OI.16 o r-rrewn ofw wT. mm.lwa b.,w,p.rrr . :.aNewcn.i o-een.wdr oevp.o°.a s°?+wraNm+ o.ve.aree .w«.ryeron r.. City Owned Property Agreement to Annex D Annexation o Deannexalion Correction c Rezoning E" :1 SUB NUMBER R ' efer b Plat) - I O BLOCK NUMBER O SUB PAR CEL NUMBER sMlq PARCEL NUMBER(MSB) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY Q COUNTY HIGHWAY O STATE HIGHWAY rv U.S. HIGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Mar 21, 2005 SW 114 of 5-29-15 258A 0 0 Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Numbers: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 Date Requested: November 10, 2006 Date Requested for (date): November 30, 2006 Maps Requested x? Location Map x? Aerial Map x? Zoning Map x? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineerin g x? Legal Description x? Survey x? Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: Don R. Whitehurst I Case: FLD2006-09053 TDR2006-09031 Site: 635 Mandalay Avenue Property Size (Acres): 0.28 PIN: 05/29/15/54747/084/0010 Atlas Page: 258A 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:29 PM To: Albee, Rick; Bertels, Paul; Buszewski, Justyna; Buysse, Beverly A.; Buzzell, William; Chesney, Ed; Clayton, Gina; Doherty, Steve; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Elbo, Bennett; Everitt, Steven; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Keller, James; Kurleman, Scott; Maran, Robert (Bob); Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Shoberg, Elliot E.; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Vo, Phuong; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue DRC members - This case was just heard by the DRC on November 2, 2006, which was for nine attached dwelling units. The applicant has now changed courses and is now applying for a mixed use of retail sales on the ground floor and attached dwellings. There have been many changes to the site and building plans previously presented at the November 2nd DRC. For those reasons, this case is being rescheduled for the December 7, 2006, DRC meeting so that you may re-review the new proposal and add, delete or modify prior comments. So, on Monday, Sherry and Gayle will send out this case to you for your review at the December 7th DRC meeting. Any questions, feel free to contact me. Thanks. Wayne 0 .0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 7:35 AM To: Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: 635 Mandalay Avenue Renee - With the addition of retail as part of this request and no off-street parking for such new use, a parking demand study will be required to be submitted. As I have mentioned, 490 Mandalay Avenue is now providing retail on the ground floor of their project with no off-street parking for this new use and they have submitted a parking demand study for the reduction of required parking. If you would like a copy of this study prepared for 490 Mandalay Avenue, let me know. Wayne 10:05 am Case Number: FLD2006-09 -- 635 MANDALAY AVE , F6 Owner(s): Don R Whitehurst 1801 Se Us Highway 19 Crystal River, F134429 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: renee@northsideengineering.com Location: 0.28 acres located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit nine attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to two feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 1.9+ feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 65 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.13; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Scott Rice, Tom Glenn, Catherine Porter Applicant: Renee Ruggiero, Patti Stough, Danny Patel The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 10 Prior to CDB: • • 1. Revise plan to indicate Fire Department Connection will be installed no closer than 15 feet from the front of the building. 2. Revise plan to indicate the Fire Hydrant Assembly will be located no further than 40 feet from the Fire Department Connection. 3. Acknowledge: Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to issuance of a building permit: 4. Note on the plan: Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 5. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. (City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30 6. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). ' 7. Double sweep cleanout for sanitary sewer shall be shown as in right-of-way and in line with the sewer lateral. Include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #304 or #305, Sheet 1 of 3. 8. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees 9. Applicant shall pay applicable sewer and water impact fees. 10. If irrigation is planned, reclaimed water is available. Availability fees will be applicable in accordance with City Ordinance. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: 9. Sidewalk(s) shall be installed within all right-of-way(s) adjacent to this site per City's Standards and Specifications, and shall be installed prior to issuance of a C.O. per Community Development Code Section 3-1701. 10. Applicant shall dedicate or deed a recorded easement over all unrestricted water lines including Fire Hydrant Assembly and backflow prevention device(s). 11. Applicant shall provide to the City a recorded copy of the Condominium Plat for: Tiffany Terrace Condominium. 12. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . Provide the status of assessment and/or remediation for reported on-site petroleum contamination from abandoned waste oil tank discovered on site Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 11 1 . Must Comply wiprdinance No. 7617-06 Radio System Regulatiofor buildings, this is residential with more than 4 stories. 11/02/2006 Radio System Regulations were given at the DRC meeting this date. (JFK) 2. Page C3.1 shows a second fire hydrant, this hydrant is to remain as this if for fire fighting. The other hydrant on the plan is for the Fire Department Connection. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 3 . Fire Flow Calculations are provided and page 7 in Flexible Development Application stated that they are not needed. This also indicated an automatic wet standpipe and fire pump ? Please show which is the correct statement. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 4. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . A fire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB 6. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. All underground fire lines and hydrants must be installed by a contractor with a class I,II or V license. 8 . Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 9. 11/02/2006 Dumpster has been relocated, need the new location of this, request has been made at the DRC meeting this date. (JFK) Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 No Issues. Landscaping: 1 , Sheet L1.1 - Plan indicates four gold trumpet trees to be installed. Plan is inconsistent with the Landscape Table, indicating TB on the plan and GT in the Table. Revise. 2. Sheet L1.1 - Indicate what landscaping to be installed along the north property line (sod?). 3 . Sheet L 1.1 - A Phoenix Reclinata palm has been shown at the southeast corner of the proposed building. Overhead utility lines exist along the south property line. This type of tree will cause trouble with the overhead utility lines. Change out this tree for accent trees. Parks and Recreation: 1 . 10/10/06 - FLD2006-09053 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: I . The following shall be addressed prior to review by CDB: 1. Provide a cross section of the north pond showing the maximum slope of 4:1. 2. Provide a north/south cross section of the lower end of the south pond showing the maximum slope of 4:1. 3. Sheet C3.1 - Section B-B indicates swale width of 3-feet but based on dimensions on Sheet A-1 building is located only 1.9 feet from the side property line. Redesign the side swale to direct runoff into the north pond. 4. Downsize the 18" RCP to a 12" Ductile Iron pipe Prior to issuance of a building permit: 5. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. Solid Waste: 1 . Staging area for dumpsters needs to be on Royal Way of an appropriate size. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 12 Traffic Engineering: 1 . Identify location of elevator(s) on site plan. 2. Provide rationale for handicap access aisle to extend beyond 19 feet and across the parking lot. 3. Relocate columns towards the middle of parking spaces to provide easier access into and out of the spaces. 4. Provide on-ground painted two-way directional arrows at the parking entrance. 5. Use yellow paint for identifying no parking areas. 6. Add a note to the site plan indicating that a minimum of 8'2" vertical clearance shall exist (including any overhangs) for van accessibility per ADA standards. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 13 J1 . Proposal is not con• nt with the rewrite of the Old Florida District•Beach by Design. Old Florida District states "To that end, Beach by Design supports the development of new overnight accommodations and attached dwellings throughout the District with limited retail/commercial and mixed use development fronting Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street." Setbacks along Mandalay were reduced to zero feet for 80 percent of the property line for properties fronting on Mandalay Avenue, in keeping with the historical pattern. Staff will not support the request unless redesigned as a mixed use with limited retail/commercial on the ground floor. J2. Beach by Design Old Florida District permits a zero side setback. Proposed is a setback to the north property line of 1.11 feet. However, based on the elevations submitted on Sheet C-1 for the second floor, the roof overhang on the north side is 3'-8", which means the overhang crosses over the property line extending onto the adjacent property. Revise overhang (including meeting Building/Fire Code requirements). J3 . Sheet A-1 - Floor plan for Units 101/102 appear incomplete on the north and south sides, based on the elevation drawings, in that the building width does not equal 102 feet. End walls on the north and south side are not shown with a thicker line, as all others. It also indicates a first first floor mansard-type roof structure, which does not exist per the elevations (should be shown on the second floor, not the first floor). Revise. J4. Sheet A-1 - There appears to be double exterior walls on the east and west sides of the first floor (Units 101/102), all sides on the second floor (Units 201/202) and all sides on the fourth floor (Units 401/402). Revise. J 5 . Sheet A-1 - Third floor (Units 301/302) plan indicates a mansard-type roof structure on the north and south sides of the building, that doesn't exist per the elevations. Revise to show this roof structure on the fourth floor (Units 401/402). J6. Sheet A-1 - Indicate what the square structure is on the balconies for the first, second, third and fourth floors (hot tub?). If a hot tub, why none on the fifth floor? J7. Sheet A-1 - Comment: If the square structures on the western balconies are hot tubs, such doesn't provide much privacy for the unit dwellers, as they will be seen from Mandalay Avenue (picket aluminum railings). J8. Sheet A-1 - Show on the first floor plan (Units 101/102) the mansard roof structures on the west side of the floor. 9 Sheet C-1 - Dimension the width of roof overhangs on all floors. 0 . Sheet C-1 - East Elevation - Why doesn't Unit 201 have any east windows, like Unit 202 (similar to the units on the first and third floors also)? Revise also Sheet A-1 if windows are proposed in Unit 201. 111. Site Plan Sheet C2.1 and the ground floor plan on Sheet A-1 indicates a trash room on the east side of the eastern stairwell. How will unit dwellers deposit trash in the container in the trash room (do they have to open the rollup door)? Are unit dwellers expected to walk their trash down to the trash room? No trash chutes are indicated on the floor plans. It is noted that the trash room looks only large enough for one rolling dumpster. Advise/revise. Also, since on both Sheets C2.1 and A-1 the trash room extends beyond the face of the eastern stairwell and is only on the ground floor, indicate on the East Elevation on Sheet C-1 the roof over this trash room. J12. Since the trash room is only large enough for one rolling dumpster, the trash staging area shown is excessively large, seeing as it can only be for one dumpster and the trash truck must roll it out from the trash staging area. Reduce to an appropriate size on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1. 113. Sheet C2.1 - Revise the dimension from the north property line from 1.11 to 1.9+ (see dimension on Sheet A-1). 114. Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1 - Sidewalks from the lobbies to Mandalay Avenue are excessively wide at 12 feet wide (wider than Mandalay sidewalk) and are for only nine dwelling units. Reduce in width to no more than six feet in width. J15 . Based on the survey submitted and site inspection,. there are two drop curbs for driveways on Mandalay Avenue and a concrete apron on Royal Way close to Mandalay Avenue. Remove these driveways. Revise Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1. J16. There are four monitoring wells shown on the survey and the site plan. Since three of these are under the proposed building, what are happening to these monitoring wells (being removed or must stay)? 117. Sheet C3.1 indicates a pond depth of 1.75 feet on a vertical drop. Are handrails for safety required? Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 14 118. There is an existin lire hydrant on Royal Way at Mandalay Avenue,?fiown on the survey and Sheet C3.1. Label this fire hydrant better. ((?9 . Sheet C-1 - Are all of the windows intended to be inoperable large pane windows, or will the windows be multi-paned and some operable? If they are intended to be multi-paned, show as such. 20 With the building being proposed less than two feet from the north property line, provide documentation that windows on the north side of the first floor and second floor are permitted as shown per the Building/Fire Code. If not permitted, revise the elevation and floor plan drawings. J21 . Site and building plans appear to indicate walls along the west and south sides of the building to screen views of the building. Elevation drawings leave much to the imagination as to indicating screening walls. Criteria for attached dwellings in the T District states: "Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level." Provide drawings and notes to show compliance with this criteria. 122. Sheet C-1 indicates electrical meters will be located above BFE and that no platform will be necessary. Show where are such electrical meters to be located? 2 . Show location of exterior a/c units and required screening. 2-4 . Sheet A-1 - Garage/Ground floor - Unclear what the "wall" is extending three spaces in from the south building wall on the west side of the driveway. Advise/revise. J25 . Sheet C2.1 - Relocate exit door to west end of south side of eastern stairwell (per building plans). 426. Sheet C-1 - Front Elevation - Show balcony railings on front of thrid floor, much like second floor. 27 Sheet C-1 - Indicate the distance in feet of the building stepbacks on the Front Elevation (remove from floor plans on Sheet A-1 as it is confusing). 428 . Sheet C2.1 indicates double swing doors for the trash room, while the Building Elevations Sheet C-1 shows a rolling door. Which is correct? J29. Revise the "Street Address" on Page 1 of the application from 639 to 635 Mandalay Avenue. J® Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; J0. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title document be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; ®2 Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 3®. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: ?,{? That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; JO. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 685 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 685 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (685 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 15 138. Response to Attac Flexibility criteria #4a: HOW will the architectural design of the hDwelhng building, with its varying lines, and landscaping contribute to an active and dynamic street life along Mandalay Avenue. The proposal does not provide limited retail/commercial uses on the first floor fronting on Mandalay Avenue, as Beach by Design intends. Note: There exists a sidewalk along Mandalay and a sidewalk is proposed along Royal Way, but neither contributes to a more active and dynamic street life (remove reference to sidewalks). 39 . Response to Attached Dwelling Flexibility criteria #5b: Response states that "all facades of the building will be finished and will contain architectural features." This statement conflicts with the actual design (site and building) (see other applicable comments). Unclear what is meant by the facade (relating to the parking level, since this is what the criteria is addressing) containing "architectural features," since no architectural features are shown on the elevations (unless a flat wall is being touted as an architectural feature). 140 . Response to Attached Dwelling Flexibility criteria #6: Response needs to address the re-writtten Old Florida District of Beach by Design height, setbacks, stepbacks, buffers and any other applicable criteria and applicable Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. 41 Sheet C-1 - Indicate the proposed color scheme by writing the names of the colors on the applicable portions of the building. The 8.5"x11" colored plans appear inconsistent as it relates to the first floor colors. It appears that "white mountain" is indicated on the ground floor and "portions" of the first floor, while "tender touch" is for the second through fifth floors. Indicate on all elevations for clarity. J42 . Based on the project value submitted on the application, this project may be subject to a public art requirement, per Ordinance No. 7489-05. Contact Christopher Hubbard, Public Art Specialist (727-562-4837; christopher.hubbard@myclearwater.com). Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 12/19/06 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 11/9/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 16 i 10.05 am Case Number: FLD2006-09053 -- 635 MANDALAY AVE Owner(s): Don R Whitehurst 1801 Se Us Highway 19 Crystal River, F134429 TELEPHONE: No Phone, Representative: Housh Ghovaee 601 Cleveland Street L' FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email *0 MA 1107"096 D01111LGw.wwrF+c Clearwater, F133755 TELEPHONE: 727-443-2869, FAX: 727-446-8036, E-MAIL: renee@northsideengineering.com Location: 0.28 acres located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit nine attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions ; (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamutphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Steve Doherty, Jun Keller, Applicant: Renee Ruggiero, Housh Ghovaee, Roland Rogers The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 10 1 . Prior to CDB: 1. Revise plan to indicate Fire Department Connection will be installed no closer than 15 feet from the front of the building. 2. Revise plan to indicate the Fire Hydrant Assembly will be located no further than 40 feet from the Fire Department Connection. 3. Acknowledge: Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Prior to issuance of a building permit: 4. Note on the plan: Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 5. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. (City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30 6. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 7. Double sweep cleanout for sanitary sewer shall be shown as in right-of-way and in line with the sewer lateral. Include City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #304 or #305, Sheet 1 of 3. 8. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.096) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees 9. Applicant shall pay applicable sewer and water impact fees. 10. If irrigation is planned, reclaimed water is available. Availability fees will be applicable in accordance with City Ordinance. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: 9. Sidewalk(s) shall be installed within all right-of-way(s) adjacent to this site per City's Standards and Specifications, and shall be installed prior to issuance of a C.O. per Community Development Code Section 3-1701. 10. Applicant shall dedicate or deed a recorded easement over all unrestricted water lines including Fire Hydrant Assembly and backflow prevention device(s). 11. Applicant shall provide to the City a recorded copy of the Condominium Plat for: Tiffany Terrace Condominium. 12. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Provide the status of assessment and/or remediation for reported on-site petroleum contamination from abandoned waste oil tank discovered on site Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 11 1 . Must Comply withlrdinance No. 7617-06 Radio System Regulations. for buildings, this is residential with more than 4 stories. 2. Page C3.1 shows a second fire hydrant, this hydrant is to remain as this if for fire fighting. The other hydrant on the plan is for the Fire Department Connection. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 3. Fire Flow Calculations are provided and page 7 in Flexible Development Application stated that they are not needed. This also indicated an automatic wet standpipe and fire pump ? Please show which is the correct statement. Acknowledge PRIOR to CDB 4. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . A fire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB 6. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. All underground fire lines and hydrants must be installed by a contractor with a class I,II or V license. 8 . Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . Sheet L1.1 - Plan indicates four gold trumpet trees to be installed. Plan is inconsistent with the Landscape Table., indicating TB on the plan and GT in the Table. Revise. 2. Sheet L1.1 - Indicate what landscaping to be installed along the north property line (sod?). 3 . Sheet L1.1 - A Phoenix Reclinata palm has been shown at the southeast corner of the proposed building. Overhead utility lines exist along the south property line. This type of tree will cause trouble with the overhead utility lines. Change out this tree for accent trees. Parks and Recreation: 1 . 10/10/06 - FLD2006-09053 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 , The following shall be addressed prior to review by CDB: 1. Provide a cross section of the north pond showing the maximum slope of 4:1. 2. Provide a north/south cross section of the lower end of the south pond showing the maximum slope of 4:1. 3. Sheet C3.1 - Section B-B indicates swale width of 3-feet but based on dimensions on Sheet A-1 building is located only 1.9 feet from the side property line. Redesign the side swale to direct runoff into the north pond. 4. Downsize the 18" RCP to a 12" Ductile Iron pipe Prior to issuance of a building permit: 5. Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit. Solid Waste: 1 . Staging area for dumpsters needs to be on Royal Way of an appropriate size. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 12 1 . Identify location of elevator(s) on site plan. 2. Provide rationale for handicap access aisle to extend beyond 19 feet and across the parking lot. 3. Relocate columns towards the middle of parking spaces to provide easier access into and out of the spaces. 4. Provide on-ground painted two-way directional arrows at the parking entrance. 5. Use yellow paint for identifying no parking areas. 6. Add a note to the site plan indicating that a minimum of 8'2" vertical clearance shall exist (including any overhangs) for van accessibility per ADA standards. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 13 1 . Proposal is not consiste0 nt with the rewrite of the Old Florida District f each by Design. Old Florida District states "To that end, Beach by Design supports the development of new overnight accommodations and attached dwellings throughout the District with limited retail/commercial and mixed use development fronting Mandalay Avenue between Bay Esplanade and Somerset Street." Setbacks along Mandalay were reduced to zero feet for 80 percent of the property line for properties fronting on Mandalay Avenue, in keeping with the historical pattern. Staff will not support the request unless redesigned as a mixed use with limited retail/commercial on the ground floor. 2. Beach by Design Old Florida District permits a zero side setback. Proposed is a setback to the north property line of 1.11 feet. However, based on the elevations submitted on Sheet C-1 for the second floor, the roof overhang on the north side is 3'-8", which means the overhang crosses over the property line extending onto the adjacent property. Revise overhang (including meeting Building/Fire Code requirements). 3 . Sheet A-1 - Floor plan for Units 101/102 appear incomplete on the north and south sides, based on the elevation drawings, in that the building width does not equal 102 feet. End walls on the north and south side are not shown with a thicker line, as all others. It also indicates a first first floor mansard-type roof structure, which does not exist per the elevations (should be shown on the second floor, not the first floor). Revise. 4. Sheet A-1 - There appears to be double exterior walls on the east and west sides of the first floor (Units 101/102), all sides on the second floor (Units 201/202) and all sides on the fourth floor (Units 401/402). Revise. 5 . Sheet A-1 - Third floor (Units 301/302) plan indicates a mansard-type roof structure on the north and south sides of the building, that doesn't exist per the elevations. Revise to show this roof structure on the fourth floor (Units 401/402). 6. Sheet A-1 - Indicate what the square structure is on the balconies for the first, second, third and fourth floors (hot tub?). If a hot tub, why none on the fifth floor? 7. Sheet A-1 - Comment: If the square structures on the western balconies are hot tubs, such doesn't provide much privacy for the unit dwellers, as they will be seen from Mandalay Avenue (picket aluminum railings). 8 . Sheet A-1 - Show on the first floor plan (Units 101/102) the mansard roof structures on the west side of the floor. 9. Sheet C-1 - Dimension the width of roof overhangs on all floors. 10. Sheet C-1 - East Elevation - Why doesn't Unit 201 have any east windows, like Unit 202 (similar to the units on the first and third floors also)? Revise also Sheet A-1 if windows are proposed in Unit 201. 11 . Site Plan Sheet C2.1 and the ground floor plan on Sheet A-1 indicates a trash room on the east side of the eastern stairwell. How will unit dwellers deposit trash in the container in the trash room (do they have to open the rollup door)? Are unit dwellers expected to walk their trash down to the trash room? No trash chutes are indicated on the floor plans. It is noted that the trash room looks only large enough for one rolling dumpster. Advise/revise. Also, since on both Sheets C2.1 and A-1 the trash room extends beyond the face of the eastern stairwell and is only on the ground floor, indicate on the East Elevation on Sheet C-1 the roof over this trash room. 12. Since the trash room is only large enough for one rolling dumpster, the trash staging area shown is excessively large, seeing as it can only be for one dumpster and the trash truck must roll it out from the trash staging area. Reduce to an appropriate size on Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1. 13. Sheet C2.1 - Revise the dimension from the north property line from 1.11 to 1.9+ (see dimension on Sheet A-1). 14. Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and LL 1 - Sidewalks from the lobbies to Mandalay Avenue are excessively wide at 12 feet wide (wider than Mandalay sidewalk) and are for only nine dwelling units. Reduce in width to no more than six feet in width. 15. Based on the survey submitted and site inspection, there are two drop curbs for driveways on Mandalay Avenue and a concrete apron on Royal Way close to Mandalay Avenue. Remove these driveways. Revise Sheets C2.1, C3.1 and L1.1. 16. There are four monitoring wells shown on the survey and the site plan. Since three of these are under the proposed building, what are happening to these monitoring wells (being removed or must stay)? 17. Sheet C3.1 indicates a pond depth of 1.75 feet on a vertical drop. Are handrails for safety required? Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 14 18. There is an existing fire hydrant on Royal Way at Mandalay Avenue, snown on the survey and Sheet C3.1. Label this fire hydrant better. 19. Sheet C-1 - Are all of the windows intended to be inoperable large pane windows, or will the windows be multi-paned and some operable? If they are intended to be multi-paned, show as such. 20. With the building being proposed less than two feet from the north property line, provide documentation that windows on the north side of the first floor and second floor are permitted as shown per the Building/Fire Code. If not permitted, revise the elevation and floor plan drawings. 21 . Site and building plans appear to indicate walls along the west and south sides of the building to screen views of the building. Elevation drawings leave much to the imagination as to indicating screening walls. Criteria for attached dwellings in the T District states: "Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level." Provide drawings and notes to show compliance with this criteria. 22. Sheet C-1 indicates electrical meters will be located above BFE and that no platform will be necessary. Show where are such electrical meters to be located? 23 . Show location of exterior a/c units and required screening. 24. Sheet A-1 - Garage/Ground floor - Unclear what the "wall" is extending three spaces in from the south building wall on the west side of the driveway. Advise/revise. 25 . Sheet C2.1 - Relocate exit door to west end of south side of eastern stairwell (per building plans). 26. Sheet C-1 - Front Elevation - Show balcony railings on front of thrid floor, much like second floor. 27. Sheet C-1 - Indicate the distance in feet of the building stepbacks on the Front Elevation (remove from floor plans on Sheet A-1 as it is confusing). 28. Sheet C2.1 indicates double swing doors for the trash room, while the Building Elevations Sheet C-1 shows a rolling door. Which is correct? 29. Revise the "Street Address" on Page 1 of the application from 639 to 635 Mandalay Avenue. 30. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 31 . Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title document be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 32. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 33 . Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 34. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 35 . Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 685 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 685 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (685 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 36. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 37. Condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 15 38 . Response to AttachfeDwelling Flexibility criteria #4a: HOW will the architectural design of the building, with its varying lines, and landscaping contribute to an active and dynamic street life along Mandalay Avenue. The proposal does not provide limited retail/commercial uses on the first floor fronting on Mandalay Avenue, as Beach by Design intends. Note: There exists a sidewalk along Mandalay and a sidewalk is proposed along Royal Way, but neither contributes to a more active and dynamic street life (remove reference to sidewalks). 39. Response to Attached Dwelling Flexibility criteria #5b: Response states that "all facades of the building will be finished and will contain architectural features." This statement conflicts with the actual design (site and building) (see other applicable comments). Unclear what is meant by the facade (relating to the parking level, since this is what the criteria is addressing) containing "architectural features," since no architectural features are shown on the elevations (unless a flat wall is being touted as an architectural feature). 40. Response to Attached Dwelling Flexibility criteria #6: Response needs to address the re-writtten Old Florida District of Beach by Design height, setbacks, stepbacks, buffers and any other applicable criteria and applicable Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. 41 . Sheet C-1 - Indicate the proposed color scheme by writing the names of the colors on the applicable portions of the building. The 8.5"x11" colored plans appear inconsistent as it relates to the first floor colors. It appears that "white mountain" is indicated on the ground floor and "portions" of the first floor, while "tender touch" is for the second through fifth floors. Indicate on all elevations for clarity. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 12/19/06 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 11/9/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 16 Rinellas County Property Appaer Information: 05 29 15 54792 002 06 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 54747 / 084 / 0010 26-Sep-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:10:25 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales WHITEHURST, DON R OBK: 04952 OPG: 0877 1801 SE US HIGHWAY 19 CRYSTAL RIDER FL 34429-9065 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 2004 2005 l f rom - : sa es 0 Sale Date OR Book/Pa ge Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 /i,979 4,952/ 8 77 189,000 (Q) I 1925: Book 020 Pgs 027- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 781,400 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 781,400 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 781,400 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CU Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 10,893.60 1) 119 x 103 75.00 12, 257.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 10, 893.60 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 10,893. 60 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 BLK 84, LOTS i AND 2 Description Building Information http://l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 9/26/2006 Pinellas County Property Appal er Information: 05 29 15 54792 002 Of 05 / 29 / 15 / 54747 / 054 / 0010 Page 3 of 5 26-Sep-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 19:10:29 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 000 Land Use; i0 Vac-art T ExTra F4e aTure! Em- Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*_1 E Ft-1 I I M-1114 FQ http://l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=] &b=l &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 9/26/2006 Y Pinellas County Property Ap 4 er Information: 05 29 15 54792 002 040 12 NL.D IDLE r? ?4148L L I ?S I ? H IL ?.? Y Y 7 7 ,OO Yri1.) It I y 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) AY W z LU WAY L---E LAV..4DE BA ARTI. F- ESPLA AVE 03436 5P Page 4 of 5 http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 9/26/2006 LOYAL MANED FLAY IfINSEETI Oinell s '. ounty Prop r u., k4; m nfortnation: 05 15 54792 002 ?,, < <} 'fie 5 of 5 ?I ? 11`1 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, February 20, 2007, beginning at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Don R. Whitehurst (Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 sq ft of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Ave.) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 2.1 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 58.83 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. [Proposed Use: Mixed Use (8 attached dwellings and 1,253 sq ft of retail floor area).] at 635 Mandalay Ave., Mandalay Unit No. 2 Blk 84, Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 2. 2340 Drew Street LLC and Drew Professional Park Condominium Association, Inc. are requesting Flexible Development application to allow a Governmental Use within the Office (O) District at 2316 Drew St with a maximum building height of 38 ft; front (south) setbacks of 25 ft (to building) and 15 ft (to pavement); front (west) setbacks of 62 ft (to building) and 15 ft (to pavement); side (north) setbacks of 55 ft (to building) and 10 ft (to pavement); side (east) setbacks of 171 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement); a minimum off-street parking requirement of 3.76 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft of gross floor area; and to reduce the side (west) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) for the existing Office and Medical Clinic uses at 2346-2370 Drew St as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project pursuant to Sec. 2-1004.6 of the Community Development Code along with a reduction to the side (north) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 ft to 10 ft, a reduction to the interior tree requirement from 25 to 19, and an increase to the maximum percentage of palms that can be incorporated into the landscape plan from 25%a to 29% at 2316 Drew St; and a reduction to the side (west) perimeter landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft at 2346-2370 Drew St. as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant. to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Governmental Use) at 2316, 2346, 2352. 2358, 2364 and 2370 Drew St., Rolling Heights Lots C -G, part of. Lot H lying west of Drew Professional Park Phase I. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-11062 3. Poulos Family Corp Inc. Boos-Gulf-to-Bay & Keene, LLC., D. Guy McMullen Prop. Inc. are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit retail sales and service in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to parking lot), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to parking lot), an increase in allowable building height from 25 ft to 34 ft and to permit direct access to a major arterial street as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Program under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C; (2) to permit Non-Residential Off-Street Parking in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District with the elimination of the required minimum 4 ft high wall landscaped on the external side to screen • 0 off-street parking spaces at the southwest corner and with outdoor lighting remaining on from dusk to dawn as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-304.G; (3) to permit a wall 8 ft high including the front setback in the (MDR) Medium Density Residential District under the provisions of Sec. 3-804.A.1; (4) to permit a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer width along a portion of the west side of the property from 12 ft to 10.4 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code; and (5) the vacation of the northerly portion of the right of way of Florida Ave.. (Proposed Use: Retail Sales and Services) at 1765 and1771 Gulf To Bay Blvd & 515 Florida Ave., Suburb Beautiful Blk A, Lots 4 & 6, & part of Lots 2,3, & 5, Suburb Beautiful Blk B, Lots 1,2,5 V. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2006-11061 4. Crystal Beach Capital, LLC., (Hyatt, aka Aqualea) is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the elimination of a pedestrian overpass over S. Gulfview Blvd. and to permit a standalone concession facility in lieu of the bridge landing area for such concessions for the Hyatt/Aqualea project, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Hotel of 250 rooms (153.37 rooms/acre on total site), 18 attached dwellings (11.04 units/acre on total site) and a max. of 70,000 sq ft (0.98 FAR on total site) of amenities accessory to the hotel, at a ht of 150 ft (to roof deck).) at 229 & 301 S. Gulfview Blvd. and 230, 300 and 304 Coronado Dr., Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 57 & 104 & Parts of Lots 56, 103 & 104 together with Vac 3` St, together with Vac E 35 ft of Gulfview Blvd., Lots 58 & 59 together with S '/2 Vac 3`d St & Vac E 35 Ft of Gulfview Blvd, Lots 105 & 106 & part of Lot 107 together with S'/2 of Vac 3`d St.. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007-01001 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi- judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross- examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. r-I L-A A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to htti)://clearwater.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.r)hr)?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 2/8/07 1066363 ONTARIO LTD 152 CLARENDON ST SOUTHAMPTON ON NOH 2L0 CANADA F*06-09053: 177 00030 - ADRIC, ALFRED C JR ADRIC, ALMUTH H IN DEN WEINGAERTEN 23A 65835 LIEDERBACH TS 00004 - GERMANY AMERPOL HOTELS & MOTELS INC 428 MINER ST BENSENVILLE IL 60106 - 2657 ARDENT INTERNATIONAL LTD LIABI 2840 WEST BAY DR # 363 BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL 33770 - 2620 BAY ESPLANADE AT CLEARWATER BE 2110 DREW ST # 100 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 BERETA, STANLEY D THE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 BROOKS, CHARLES E 11 HEILWOOD ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1623 CAPRI MOTEL CONDO ASSN 55 SOMERSET ST # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 CHITRANEE-B INC 1003 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1019 13 HEILWOOD STREET LLC 7105 PELICAN ISLAND DR TAMPA FL 33634 - 7461 AIELLO, ITALO RUFFOLD, LILIA 93 CORNELIUS PKWY TORONTO ON M61- 2K6 00030 - CANADA ANDRESON, DEAN ANDRESON,ANN 2046 BRENDLA RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1309 ARMBRUSTER, JOHN 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 BEACH & GULF SANDS INC 657 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1515 BOERNER, SUSANA B 112 S LAUBER WAY TAMPA FL 33609 - 2615 BUMGARNER, DANA BUMGARNER, MARTHA 5303 ANSONIA CT ORLANDO FL 32839 - 5249 CASW ELL LLC 949 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1011 CHRISTENSEN, DALE K CHRISTENSEN, WENDILYN C 2431 ESTANCIA BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2608 •26 CAMBRIA ST LLC 9 SUNSET BAY DR BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1644 ALBRECHT,YVETTE 16 ASHENDEN WALK FARNHAM COMMON BUCKS SL2 3UF 00009 - UNITED KINGDOM AQUA SUN DEVELOPMENTS LLC 483 MANDALAY AVE # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2035 BAWELL, WALTER A THE BAWELL, IRGIT H THE 815 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1325 BEARDSLEY, JAMES M 15 MAYFAIR LN BUFFALO NY 14201 - 1522 BRANTNER, DOUGLAS A BRANTNER, LINDA L 14300 E 13TH ST WICHITA KS 67230 - 1450 CAMBRIA VENTURES LLC 13 CAMBRIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1508 CAY AT CLEARWATER BEACH CONDO 620 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1632 COLONY SURF CONDO ASSN INC 8 CAMBRIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1509 CORNELL, MICHAEL CRIST, JAMES G CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE CORNELL, JANA CRIST, SHARON GRASS 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 1525 WINDING WAY 3124 TIFFANY DR PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 ANDERSON IN 46011 - 1661 BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3634 • 0 DE BELLIS, BARBARA DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC DELGADO, ANGEL 55 SOMERSET ST # 3 647 BAY ESPLANADE EDWARDS-DELGADO, LINDA J CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 13 CAMBRIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1508 DELGADO, ANGEL EDWARDS-DELGADO, LINDA 8 CAMBRIA ST # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1509 DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC 90 MILVAN DR TORONTO ON M91 1Z6 00030 - CANADA DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC 90 MILVAN DR TORONTO ON M9L 1Z6 00030 - CANADA DIGIACOMO, MICHAEL DIGIACOMO, LESLIE PO BOX 561 KIMBERTON PA 19442 - 0561 EVERETT, JOE S PO BOX 803 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0803 FOLEY, DONALD F FOLEY, CATHERINE G 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 GENCO,FRANK 3019 W PALMETTO ST TAMPA FL 33607 - 2936 GREGORY, STEVE C 4502 MARINE PKWY NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 3332 GUNTHER, EDWARD F GUNTHER, APPLE R 3 ASTOR CT LAKE FOREST IL 60045 - 4703 HEDSON LLC 669 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1523 DYER, FREDERICK T TRUST DYER, ROSE L TRUST 210 E GOVERNOR PL ST CHARLES MO 63301 - 4573 FENLON, KELLY A 9 CAMBRIA ST # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1510 FORLINI, DOMENICO G 808 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1324 GIBSON, JACK R JR 4725 SEYMOUR RD JACKSON MI 49201 - 7636 GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED PO BOX 152206 IRVING TX 75015 - 2206 HADDON HOUSE INN INC 854 LANTANA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1124 HESSELSCHWERDT, BERND J HESSELSCHWERDT, BERNHARD 55 SOMERSET ST # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 EMERY, NEIL J EMERY, JOANN S 13101 APPLE AVE RAVENNA MI 49451 - 9755 FITZGERALD, RONALD 665 POINSETTIA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1530 GARBIS, WILLIAM GARBIS, GLENNA S 7900 TAMELING PALOS HILLS IL 60465 - 1672 GREENWOOD, THOMAS G GREENWOOD, MELISSA M 270 FORDHAM WAY KNOXVILLE TN 37934 - 3839 GUNTHER, EDWARD F GUNTHER, APPLE R 286 PRAIRIE VIEW LN WHEELING IL 60090 - 3223 HAYS, WILLIAM D 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536 HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM O JR 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 HIRSCHFELD, JOSEPH J HUBER, RICHARD C HUCKER ENTERPRISES HIRSCHFELD, MARILYN C HUBER, DIANE M PO BOX 43 7105 PELICAN ISLAND DR 9217 SUNNY OAK DR BERKELEY HTS NJ 07922 - 0043 TAMPA FL 33634 - 7461 RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 5672 HUNTER, RICHARD F IGGESUND TOOLS INC J & J'S BEACH PLACE HUNTER, PEGGY P 220 SCARLET BLVD 7105 PELICAN ISLAND DR PO BOX 3646 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 3016 TAMPA FL 33634 - 7461 CHATTANOOGA TN 37404 - 0646 JACKSON, LANNY R KANE, JOHN F JACKSON, VICKI J JAMES, MICHELE R PAYER-KANE, PATRICIA 15 GLENDALE ST #A17 62-17 64TH ST 8 CAMBRIA ST # 301 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - MIDDLE VILLAGE NY 11379 - 1024 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1509 1514 KIELMANN LOTHAR E KINNARD, LOUIS R KEITH, CLYDE H THE , WENDY KIELMANN KINNARD, LUCRETIA L 1119 GOLFVIEW LN , 35154 LEON ST VIA S MARTA 24 GLENVIEW IL 60025 - 3176 LIVONIA MI 48150 - 2668 FIRENZE 50139 00026 - ITALY KNOWLES, NANCY LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC LABRICCIOSA, ELENA 141 LAKESHORE RD E 880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908 653 MANDALAY AVE OAKVILLE ON L6J l H3 00030- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1219 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1523 CANADA LENTRICCHIA, DOMENICK LE-SI, HAN LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T LENTRICCHIA, KARIN LE-SI, NGUYET HIRSCH, DEBORA A 814 NARCISSUS AVE 3507 CROSSINGS WAY 395 16TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334 MIDLOTHIAN VA 23113 - 6356 NEWPORT MN 55055 - 1061 LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH LO, JAMES K LONG, MARIAN C LEWINSKI, HANNA LO, KAREN A 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 104 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 306 2966 POST ROCK CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 7309 LOOKRETIS, JOHN L LOPEZ, ROSA LOU RYALS MANUS, GEORGE E LOOKRETIS, SOPHIE 3307 W GRACE ST 9480 BRYNDALE WAY NE 29 AVALON ST TAMPA FL 33607 - 5014 ADA MI 49301 - 8854 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1602 MC CULLOUGH, JAMES LIV TRUST MC FADDEN, ARLENE S MAVITY, LEON L MC CULLOUGH, MARLENE LIV MC FADDEN, ROBERT G 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 307 TRUST 661 POINSETTIA AVE #204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 21 IDLEWILD ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1517 MC KINNEY, CARMELLA C MC KINNEY, GEORGE L 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 MC SWEENEY, GARY W MC SWEENEY, CARMEN 20942 E GLEN HAVEN CIR NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 2465 MELLUM, TERESA D PAPPANI, CHARLENE 9 CAMBRIA ST # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1510 MEROLI, PETER MEROLI, PETER 967 ELDORADO AVE VON FELDT, PAUL G MERRITT, GORDON E CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 967 ELDORADO AVE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 201 1020 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 1020 0 MICHAEL, BASKOVICH MILLER, DIANE LYNN MICHAEL, SANDRA 209 SCOTLAND ST 2866 QUAIL HOLLOW RD W DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6957 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3222 MOORE, PATRICIA MORAITIS, DENIS 8 CAMBRIA ST # 302 MORAITIS, MARY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1509 147 AMBLESIDE RD DES PLAINES IL 60016 - 2652 MORRISON, GEORGE ROBERT MORREALE, JOSEPH C JR ALBERT 3169 SAN MATEO ST 115 ARGYLE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3530 KIRKLAND QC H9H 3H9 00030 - CANADA MUNCH, MICHAEL A NAGENGAST, WILLIAM E 12042 ROYCE WATERFORD CIR NAGENGAST, JUDITH E TAMPA FL 33626 - 3314 925 ANDERSON FRANKTON RD ANDERSON IN 46011 - 8737 NATSIS, EVANGELOS NELSON, EARL G NATSIS, MARIA NELSON, GLORIA M 622 POINSETTIA AVE 2060 ARCADE ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1638 ST PAUL MN 55109 - 2565 NIMA HOLDINGS INC NINE CAMBRIA CONDO ASSN 400 EDDYSTONE AVE 750 ROLLING HILLS DR TORONTO ON M3N 1 H7 00030 - PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 3015 CANADA NOTO, PETER OCEAN BREEZE LLC NOTO, MARY 200 BRIGHTWATER DR # 2 18 PERRYWINKLE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2452 WEBSTER NY 14580 - 4217 OLSON, LOUISE PAGE, PATRICIA A ETIENNE, JOY PAGE, MARGARET L 14770 SHIPWATCH TRCE # 1930 710 ELDORADO AVE LARGO FL 33774 - 5747 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 1420 PANORAMA ON CLEARWATER PARE, CAROL A BEACH L 15 GLENDALE ST # 15 483 MANDALAY AVE STE 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1552 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5521 PASQUALE, JACK R THE PAYETTE, R J III THE PASQUALE, PATRICIA A THE PAYETTE, BONNIE M THE 1433 NORMAN DR 7946 31 ST AVE DARIEN IL 60561 - 4434 KENOSHA WI 53142 - 4618 0 MONIN, OLIVIER MONIN, CAROLINE 2100 RANGE RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2125 MORALES, RAUL MORALES, BLANCA 930 EL DORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 MOSSER, RICHARD S 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536 NAGENGAST, WILLIAM NAGENGAST, JUDITH E 925 ANDERSON FRANKLIN RD ANDERSON IN 46011 - 8737 NICHOLAS, JERRY 3002 STRAWBERRY RD #OFC PASADENA TX 77502 - 5230 NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH DEVELOP PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189 OGILVIE, SCOTT 18 GLENDALE ST # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1566 PALMA, GEORGE 32 FORGE DR DOWNSVIEW ON CANADA M3N 2R3 00030 - PARKS, DANA L BARKES, MICHAEL G 11961 LOCUST LN COLUMBUS IN 47201 - 8964 PELLEGRINELLI, GUY A JR PELLEGRINELLI, MARY 459 FENN ST PITTSFIELD MA 01201 - 5262 PENTHOUSE SHORES ASSN INC PIERSON, DON C PIOLI, RICHARD T THE 661 POINSETTIA AVE PIERSON, GLORIA G PIOLI, ROBERTA B THE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1561 5833 MARINER DR 750 ISLAND WAY # 402 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3411 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1820 POOK, PEACHES 234 DOLPHIN POINT RD # 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2110 PORTER, THOMAS PORTER, MARCELLA 2256 VICTORIA WINDSOR ON N8X 1 R1 00030- CANADA PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 ROHEN, WILLIAM A 1704 N 12TH AVE MELROSE PARK IL 60160 - 2251 ROWE, ROBERT B THE ROWE, WENDY A THE PO BOX 3711 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8711 SAMPSON, THOMAS A SAMPSON, CAROLYN L 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 SEIFERT, MICHAEL E SEIFERT, NANCY S 5825 PERSIMMON DR MADISON WI 53711 - 5003 SHILOH INV INC 3133 W 300 S TIPTON IN 46072 - 8103 SOBOLESKI, JAMES W 191 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2439 RAILEY, DANIEL E RAILEY, ANN H 1345 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 6533 ROLLINSON, ANN C 1364 ELLINGTON RD SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06074 - 2600 ROYAL NORTH BEACH LLC 5560 BATES ST SEMINOLE FL 33772 - 7149 SANFILIPPO, JAMES A MARTIN, JOHN E 47 BLACK HAWK CT HOLMDEL NJ 07733 - 2523 SHAY, BRIAN J THE SHAY, STEPHANIE A THE 7838 SE 22ND PL MERCER ISLAND WA 98040 - 2237 SIBERT, LUTHER L JR SIBERT, SHARON D 1199 SHIPWATCH CIR TAMPA FL 33602 - 5740 SOTTILE, BENJAMIN J SOTTILE, ILEANA 24 S PARK DR TENAFLY NJ 07670 - 3025 RASCONA, LISA RASCONA, ANTHONY 45 ELAINE DR STAMFORD CT 06902 - 8312 ROPHIE, RALPH A ROPH I E, VAN ESSA 450 PALM ISL SE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1938 ROZENITS, FRED ROZENITS, ANNA 31 ISLAND WAY # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2207 SCARLET, DOT LLC 200 BRIGHTWATER DR # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2452 SHESTOKAS, ALBERT J II 8 CAMBRIA ST # PH 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1509 SMITH, RUPERT W JR SMITH, IRENE V 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 SOWAKINAS, DAVID J 2 ADALIA AVE # 408 TAMPA FL 33606 - 3315 SPEAR, ROBERT E THE SPERELAKIS, NICHOLAS SR STERNS, DANIEL 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J STERNS,'DONYA HENDERSONVILLE NC 28791 - 1396 12114 PAULMEADOWS DR 2150 120TH PL SE CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330 BELLEVUE WA 98005 - 4651 0 STRATEMAN, DALAL N PO BOX 3445 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8445 SURFSIDE OF PINELLAS CONDO ASS 11 IDLEWILD ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1563 THOMPSON, MICHAEL S THOMPSON, MARIA THURMOND, WILLIAM H BRENDON FEN POND RD IGTHEHM THURMOND, CAROL H NEAR SEVEN OAKS PO BOX 478 KENT TN 15 9JE 00003 - NEW ELLENTON SC 29809 - 0478 GREAT BRITAIN TSETSE LLC 5210 WEBB RD TAMPA FL 33615 - 4518 VAN CLEAVE, ROBERT M & MARY RE VAN CLEAVE, ROBERT M THE 60 LANE 200FD LAKE JAMES ANGOLA IN 46703 - 9570 VASILOUDES, PANAYIOTIS VASILOUDES, HELEN 767 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1412 WAGNER, LARRY H THE 240 WINDWARD PSE # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2249 WAMO 1211 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5801 WHITEHURST, DON R 1801 SE US HIGHWAY 19 CRYSTAL RIVER FL 34429 - 9065 VERBAN,STEVE VERBAN, HELEN K 55 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 WALDOW, WARREN J JR PO BOX 8160 WEBSTER NY 14580 - 8160 WESTER, ROBERT M THE WESTER, PATRICIA A THE 6 WOODGLEN ST CHARLES MO 63304 - 7609 WILSON, WILLIAM D JR 245 SANDRIDGE CT ALPHARETTA GA 30022 - 7064 • TALON PROJECT 3437 OTHERDAY CIR SHAKOPEE MN 55379 - 9615 TSE TSE LLC 610 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1632 VASILOUDES, PANAYIOTIS VASILOUDES, HELEN 12108 MARBLEHEAD DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2504 VILLAS OF CLEARWATER BEACH CON 15 GLENDALE ST APT A14 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1514 WALLACE, A BARBARA 606 CYPRUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1620 WHITE, ANDREA P 55 SOMERSET ST # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1546 WORSFOLD, PAUL JOHN WORSFOLD, CHRISTINA MARIE 5216 SAND TRAP PLACE VALRICO FL 33594 - 8291 WOSCHITZ, EVA THE CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOCIATION CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS 302 POINSETTIA LAND TRUST JAY KEYES COALITION 10 COURTWOOD PL 100 DEVON DRIVE JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT TORONTO ON M2K 1Z9 00030 - CLEARWATER, FL 33767: P.O. BOX 8204 CANADA CLEARWATER, FL 33758 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:44 AM To: 'Mucsrus7@aol.com' Cc: 'wwaldow@rochester.rr.com' Subject: CDB Hearing for Cases FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031, 635 Mandalay Avenue Mr. McCullough and Mr. Waldow - As a follow-up to our prior emails, I wanted to let you know that your request to continue the above application was considered by the Community Development Board (CDB) at their meeting on Tuesday, February 20, 2007, and was denied. The CDB, after public hearing, approved the application. I am attaching the Development Order for your information. Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me by email or by phone (727-562-4504). Wayne Wells Planner III 1_= I Mandalay 635 )evelopment Order.. 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:52 AM To: 'Mucsrus7@aol.com' Subject: FW: CDB Hearing for FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Entered wrong email address for you. -----Original Message----- . From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:46 AM To: 'M ussrus7@aol.com' Cc: 'wwaldow@rochester.rr.com'; Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: CDB Hearing for FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Mr. McCullough - You have submitted a request to have the Community Development Board (CDB) continue the above referenced application to their March 20, 2007, meeting. I know we have had some emails back and forth regarding Old Florida District information. I am enquiring whether you still desire to have the CDB continue the application to their March meeting. Please let me know, if possible by 3:00 pm on Friday, February 16, 2007. Wayne 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:46 AM To: 'Mussrus7@aol.com' Cc: 'wwaldow@rochester.rr.com; Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: CDB Hearing for FLD2006-09053, 635 Mandalay Avenue Mr. McCullough - You have submitted a request to have the Community Development Board (CDB) continue the above referenced application to their March 20, 2007, meeting. I know we have had some emails back and forth regarding Old Florida District information. I am enquiring whether you still desire to have the CDB continue the application to their March meeting. Please let me know, if possible by 3:00 pm on Friday, February 16, 2007. Wayne 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 7:17 AM To: 'Mucsrus7@aol.com' Cc: wwaldow@rochester.rr.com Subject: RE: CDB Hearing Mr. McCullough - I have gone through myclearwater.com to the same place that you did and it came up. I also clicked on the address below and it took me to the same location, which is the Old Florida District discussion and requirements. Try it again. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Mucsrus7@aol.com [mailto:Mucsrus7@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:18 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: wwaldow@rochester.rr.com Subject: Re: CDB Hearing Wayne, I guess I never really saw the final, final adopted plan, but I would presume it is on the web somewhere. I would sure appreciate it if you could let me know where I could find it and perhaps I can assuage my angst. I have tried the address www myclearwater com/ oq v/depts/planning/divisions/LRplan/plans/pdf/bbd/BeachbyDesign1 b-a.pdf but the screen comes up blank. Thanks. Jim McCullough 2/13/2007 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:03 PM To: 'Mucsrus7@aol.com' Cc: wwaldow@rochester.rr.com Subject: RE: CDB Hearing Mr. McCullough - Please check with Mr. Waldow and let me know. If you went to all (or some) of the Old Florida District meetings where a new plan for this area was developed and eventually adopted by City Council (Plan), the proposal is in compliance with those guidelines/rules for the Old Florida District. The Plan desired mixed use along Mandalay Avenue at a zero setback, with stepbacks on the building and parking accessed from the rear or the side street. The proposed site plan and building elevations comply with these guidelines/rules. The request is structured to how the Zoning District, which is general to City-wide application, sets out setbacks, etc. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Mucsrus7@aol.com [mailto:Mucsrus7@aol.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:22 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: wwaldow@rochester.rr.com Subject: Re: CDB Hearing t Thank you for clarifying the location,as for some reason we were thinking it was on the west side. My mistake. I will talk with Mr. Waldow about this and get back to you asap. I am still concerned about the number of variances requested. Why did we all go through Old Florida District development guidelines if they in essence are meaningless? That would be my main concern now. Jim McCullough 2/12/2007 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 7:32 AM To: 'Mucsrus7@aol.com'; Delk, Michael Cc: wwaldow@rochester.rr.com; Renee Ruggiero (E-mail) Subject: CDB Hearing Mr. McCullough - Your request for a continuance on this application will be presented to the Community Development Board (CDB). I cannot guarantee whether the CDB will continue this application based on your request. Should the CDB continue the application, the next scheduled meeting of the CDB is March 20, 2007. 1 would like to inform you that you and Mr. Waldow are not the closest and most affected property owners. You own 21 Idlewild Street, while Mr. Waldow owns 27 Idlewild Street, where both properties are on the west side of Mandalay Avenue. The subject property under the application to be heard by the CDB is located on the east side of Mandalay Avenue, at the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way. The property is presently vacant, formerly being developed with a gas station until 1990. 1 do not know if this changes your and Mr. Waldow's concerns and request for a continuance. Please let me know of any changed concerns or request. If you would like to view the application material, including site plans and building elevations, they are available 8 am to 4:30 pm Monday through Friday, except on Wednesday when we close at 2:30 pm. You may call me or email me with any of your concerns. Wayne Wells Planner III -----Original Message----- From: Mucsrus7@aol.com [mailto:Mucsrus7@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:45 AM To: Delk, Michael; Wells, Wayne Cc: wwaldow@rochester.rr.com Subject: CDB Hearing This e-mail is to request a reschedule of the matter "Proposed Use: Mixed Use (8 attached dwellings and 1,253 sq ft of retail floor area) by Don R. Whitehurst, presently scheduled for February 20, 2007 with the Community Development Board to anytime between February 27 and March 2, 2007. This is necessitated by the fact that the owners of the two closest and most affected properties, Mr. Warren Waldow and me will not be in Clearwater to attend the meeting on February 20. Mr. Waldow resides in New York and I will be out of state and not be available to attend until the meeting dates requested above. We both have serious concerns and issues with the requested variances of permitted uses for the property and need to be present at the Board meeting to present our views on this matter. Please advise ASAP your position on this request. Thank you. James B. McCullough 21 Idlewild Street Clearwater Beach, FL 3376 727-443-3442 (h) 727-692-8077 (cell) mucsrus7@aol com (e-mail) 2/12/2007 CITY OF C LEARWAT E R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ?/'?,??,Lg> e MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ?Y?9(f 44 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Ms T PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services Inc. PO Box 4948 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4848 RE: FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 - 635 Mandalay Avenue Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: January 7, 2008 On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (February 20, 2008). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On January 2, 2008, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of market changes, which has an impact on the interior design and the completion of construction drawings. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, APPROVE a one-year time extension to February 20, 2009, to submit an application for building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 635 Mandalay Avenue. AMk "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" January 7, 2008 Ruggiero - Page 2 In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael , Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications Mandalay 0635 Tiffany Terrace (T) - ApprovedlMandalay 635 Time Ext. Dev. Order 1.7.08.doc C ITE' OF C LEARWATER ' PI.ANNING DEPARTMENT `r r Pos-T OrrlcE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FI.oRICA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICI?s BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVIiNUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 "I :u-.moN1: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE. PLANNING DEVELOPMENT RlvlEw February 21, 2007 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Cases FLD2006-09053/TDR2006-09031 635 Mandalay Avenue Dear Ms. Ruggiero: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the. Community Development Code. On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (west along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to 2.1 feet (to building), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required off-street parking from 22 spaces (16 spaces for attached dwellings; 6 spaces for retail sales) to 18 spaces and deviations to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and to allow a reduction to the minimum vehicle stacking distance, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and a reduction to the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue from five feet to zero feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; and (2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-09031) of one dwelling unit from 689 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The subject 0.28 acres is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Royal Way; 2. The site is currently vacant; 3. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 4. The proposal is for the construction of a mixed-use building of eight attached dwellings and 1,253 square feet of retail floor area, in compliance with the vision in Beach by Design for this area; 5. The retail floor area has been designed for two retail units facing Mandalay Avenue at a three-foot front setback in compliance with the requirements of the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design; 6. The proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; PRANK 11!!t ARD. NIAMR J(AIN DORA:N, C(A NCHAIFNMEk I Icn_!. I i:Cd!C!()N, Co[ I3!!.!. ION.',0:, 0 K(AI.NH:.\IHFk Gul'I::?: A. 111:1 !.;:, Cc t >Cn_ }ic n!AI. }:,w 1.c n MrN T nNn Arrn;n+:r! ;v!: Ac: ru N Fm '! c» !:R" February 21, 2007 Ruggiero - Page Two The proposed building height is 58.83 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The applicant proposes 18 parking spaces on-site, including one handicap space, to accommodate the eight residential units in the building at two parking spaces per unit and one space each for the owners/operators of the retail units; 9. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 22 spaces (six spaces for retail sales; 16 spaces for attached dwellings) to 18 spaces; 10. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted providing the justification for the parking reduction; 11. The proposal includes the construction of 11 new angled parking spaces within the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way in front of the subject site, increasing the overall number of parking spaces available to the surrounding businesses and dwellings; 12. The proposed building meets the setback and stepback requirements of the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design; 13. The proposal includes the elimination of the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue at least where the stairwell is located and the reduction of the foundation landscaping to three feet in front of the retail units, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria; and 14. That there are no active Code Enforcement cases for this property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 689 Bay Esplanade and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 689 Bay Esplanade due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (689 Bay Esplanade) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That the new parking spaces and landscape island within Mandalay Avenue meet the following requirements: a. the applicant construct the improvements at their expense; b. signage be erected by the City limiting the time for parking within these spaces; c. a 30-foot curb radius be provided on the landscape island; February 21, 2007 Ruggiero - Page Three d. prior to the issuance of any permits, a right-of-way use permit be required, which will include approval of landscaping within the landscape island acceptable to the City Engineer; e. the landscape island include shrubbery to fill the island and one cabbage palm, where shrubbery be maintained at a height not to exceed 30-inches; and f. the landscape island be provided with irrigation; 6. That all dumpsters be enclosed within trash rooms or screened trash areas, including those for the commercial units, acceptable to the Planning and Solid Waste Departments, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 7. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the Royal Way right-of-way shall be installed for the site frontage prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 9. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be monument-style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a final determination be made regarding the existing monitoring wells, acceptable to the Environmental Engineering and Planning Departments; 11. That, prior to the issuance of the building permit, air conditioning units be screened from view from public streets or adjacent properties; 12. That, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant provide copies of the condominium documents designating the southernmost parking space on either side of the drive aisle for the owners/operators of the retail units; 13. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 15. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (February 20, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community. Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending February 21, 2007 Ruggiero - Page Four the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on March 7, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. Sincerely, Planning Director SAPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished Applications Mandalay 0635 Tiffany Terrace (T) - ApprovedlMandalay 635 Development Order 2.21.07.doc . ~ ~ - ~ aoo6 ~0~0~3 ~ 1 . p41 ti 0 LEGS ~ ~ M~ 0 00 .EXIST. ELEVATION x Q A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: R EXIST, CONTOUR , _ 10 . a ~ NEW ELEVATION +10.00 ~ QO, ~Z 1 AND 2 BLOCK 84 OF MANDALAY "THE ISLE OF A THOUSAND PALMS'; LOTS , CLFARWATER BEACH, UNIT No, 5, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 27 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS R~®~, NEW CONTOUR ®~~~~lQ~_~~ z Kw COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 12,218 SQUARE FEET, OR 0,2805 ACRES MORE OR LESS. EXIST. STORM SEWER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~F NEW STORM SEWER ~ e • ® . ~ _ ' ® ~ N ,Z M NEW UNDERDRAIN i ¦amun~ssnsuuuui ~d d~'U Q EXIST, SAN. SEWER ~ ~ m , F N W W NEW SAN, SEWER ¦i-i~i~i~ivi~i¦ t z ~ EXIST. WATER SERVICE 0 ~ ~ NEW WATER SERVICE ses~e~~o0oa~~o0s® ~ 22 rL + , . _ llifl~ 9 l.. 1 ' 1 3i1. ~ 1, ~ .r ~ ~ ~ a ~ NEW INLET- Q ~r~~j p, ,'~,v ;r,. ~Q ~ , x ~ , ~ ~ i.l~;i ~ ~ Q W f~l t a ' ~ `gib ~ ~v~ v NEW SAN, MANHOLE 0 ~x Z ~ fisi,~rr n~ Q Q a z, ~ ~ ; , ;t ~ NEW CLEAN-OUT(C.O,) V o? Q ,F _ < , p i t; A ~ H 'i~ ~ ,.~~BAY•ES~PLA~N~AD~I I ~ ~Y y , 4 B _ _ s 111 ~ z z a NEW BUILDING AREA ~ ~~.LL-~a.~ ~~:~1:~~:~kE~a~L-~ ' M5 NEW ASPHALT ~;~~~,.~.,~,;,,~~~1~: Q ,Q Q / / f f J, ~ 4 + t1+~ } I i,~ , ; i t ~j a Qj I I' t;l~i~. y5. r1 v r1 I ~ i ,i2~1 i ~ dry ~ < r~ iTtp Yb j;. NEW CONCRETE a ~ ; O y°r a; ruo p I Fr III°i,L' r a~I a ~ > > ~ ixi r ` ` NO Z .p ~ t Q 0~ N'~~+ a °a: Ply ~ ~q ~n.,r"~y"~j, F F ~ ° o ~4~, ~ TEMP, SILT BARRIER z C ~ !fit d ~v, t9+ ~f ~ i ~ is ~ f. Ul ~ w h ~~,n ~Ir r~~h -{s~~~~~~4 i1p Iyv °~1 Y , 7 . ~ ~ ;tad GL•ENDALE-ST------ _ ~ ~ S" b5h~iS tiei~~ ~I u~fl~as,t R (t A 91k~~ } ~~17(^ rl i ' Q a W 9~~s .A'' POINT OF CONNECTION - ~r~` 11, ~ ~ dh~;c? I , OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. ~ J W ~ ROY•AL--W~.A.Y...,_..._..~...~...ROYAL•-W~AY_,_ 4~,~x+ a +~rui4 r~ rt~~i 4 Q . r _ _ 1 Ej,'~ yr ~t~y+' d~ Y I~EY' M METER ~ ~ ~ ~ Sr TrIJ 1t'2F L-;. i` 1 6 ,;I_ $ tin ~ b. B.F,P.D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE ~ V ~ Q s~ + + ' r14e. ~ cNr.,~yt ~~f u~i ~ ~ ~ ~ F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY EB #5936 ~ o p =.y n , ~ F,D,C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION V v Z ~ 'f. ' Q ti ~ itii 1". ~ s: T.B.O, TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF ~ ~ r _ u I V e.l , h , i+ ` + . I ~r; ,c a ~ ~ ' T.&V. TAP AND VALVE A ' ~ _._____._......_...HEILW-OOD-ST,...____.. i - ~ ~ ~ t a ~ ~ ~~^d~i E~ a h + ~ y .'iv ~ n y i'~ ~ t 1 A ~ a ~~r ~~Y '~~i ~ ~ I ~ ~ , NES Comm.: 0639 C ~tt', U ~ e y 0 F -BAY ESPLANADE ~ ~Y P, I,~ r ~ s,,,, ~ ~ Drawn By: B.J.V. - 1 _+ra11 +f ~ h Z I Q I i~ s I r, ;~~IuMV,~K~i' ~ - V „r, u a,. ~ r 4 1 as s 1 x . ; ~ ~ ~tr,~ ~'~I Checked By, H.G. INDEXOF SHEETS C1.1 CIVIL SITE DATA Issue Date; 11108106 V I'd' - C2.1 STAKING SITE PLAN Revisions: No, Date Descri tion i ~ r + C3.1 GRADING ,DRAINAGE ~ _ NORTH & UTILITIES SITE PLAN ~ L1.1 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN D 1118/06 0 Mixed Mixed Use Calculation for TiffanyTerrace - 635 Mandalay Avenue ~ A. A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR =1.0 and maximum ~ EXISTING E PROPOSED P REQUIRED density = 30 du/acre) 0 T T T 1. 1. Permitted FAR 1.0 ~ / / ZONING: 2. 2, Building square footage ofnon-residential portion x 1,253 sf 3 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building....... =1,253 sf `M RFH RFH RFH LAND USE: j 8 D.U. 4. 0! 4. Lot area 12,218.sf o ~ VACANT 1,253 S.F. RETAIL 5. 5, Subtract the lot area required to support ~ USAGE: non-residential use in the building (#A3) -1L sf o 6. Lot area (sfl to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ,..=10,965 sf o 12,218 S.F. 12,218 S.F. 6. 10,000 S.F. ,(MIN.) LOT AREA: 0.28 ACRE 0.28 ACRE N 7. 8 D.U. 1.0 F.A.R. RETAIL 7. Divide#A6 10,965 sf ( ) S. DENSITY: (7 ALLOWED W/1 THRU TDR 8. Land area in an acre 43,560 sf ~ J C E 30 D.U./ACRE 9 (29 D.U. PER A R ) 9. Lot acreage 0.251acres ~ 10. 8,365 S.F. BUILDING COVERAGE: 11. 10. Multiply lot acreage 0.251 acres , S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE 68.5% 1 L Maximum density ......................x 30 du/acre ~3T ALAP~ AP~~QUED ( ) 12. 12. Number of dwelling units permitted 7 DU CASE # ~ Lon - ~3 ~20°6 - 1,253 S.F. GROSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): CASE TYPE 0 9 0.~/ * ~ 0.10 F.A.R. 1.0 13. F.A.R.. COMMERCIAL ONLY 13. Proposed number of dwelling units w/ 1 thru TDR .........................8 DU DRC DATE ? 12 ob -r l 71 6" TO STAIRWELL WALL CDE DATE 2.e~ u 11' TO LOBBY FRONT: W 25 TO BLDG. 15 s~~NATURE W O 3' TO COMMERCIAL FRONT BLDG. DATE? z~1o~ W ~ SETBACKS: FRONT: S 15' 15' SHARED PARKING DIAGRAM C, M O SECTION 3-1405 SIDE: N 2.1' 10' O I TIFFANY TERRACE ~ Z ~ log 0' TO TRASH STAGING , REAR: (E) 10 10 TO BLDG. WEEKDAY WEEKEND W r~ o ~ ~ Q (j U ~ U • THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD BLDG. HEIGHT: BFE TO MID. ,POINT O,F 35' OF ROOF 58 -9 1 2 I SURANCE RATE MAP 125096 0007D ZONE AE EL.11) PER FLOOD N / ( Night Day Evening .Day Evening ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MAP REVISED: 09/03/03 PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: 354 S.F. N A / V.U.A. ( ) Midnight 9 a, m. 6 p. m. 9 a, m. 6 p. m. . ~ Q ~ - USE USE b a.m: 4 p.m. Midnight 4 p,m. Midnight J ~ ~ ~ IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 9,017 SF 0.73 0.95 8 Attached D 8 Attached Dwellings (2 Spaces per Unit) 100% 60% 90% 80% 90% ~ Q W 16 10 15 13 15 ~ ~ ~ OPEN SPACE; 12,218 SF 3,201 SF ~'D4{3Sr„ / ~ ~L9 .~r V a o N A Reta>1 1253 1 Doi / ( , (S.F. & / OF GROSS SITE) 261 Reta~ (1,253 SF) 5 Spaces per 1,000 GFA = 7 yr,~';1, - uNuw~ U ll0.WA ?/o Iv/v iv/v avv/v rv/v + 1 r.p . PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING; N/A N/A 1 5 7 7 5 AA; THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND EHALL.*REMAI MIN TYtOF•TH SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY A SIGNED & SEALED SURVEY BY: (S.F. & % OF V.U.A.) NAME OF SURVEYOR, BRUCE A. KLEIN, PSM No. 5052 ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR US IN AY WITH( , DATED: 09/14/06 BASED ON NAVD 1968 PARKING: 111 8 SPACES SPACES OFFSIT FSIT O E 22 TOTAL THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER, ©CfPYRIGHT' 2007 " N PUBLISH?; TOTAL 17 15 22 20 20 2 SPACES PER UNIT - 8 D.U. X 2 = 16 SPACES REQUIRED ARKING CALCULATIONS: RETAIL 4-5 SPACES PER 1,000 GFA = 6 SPACES HiglestStun 4 H' st Sum of Vertical Column ]22 ¦ PER SECTION 3-1405 SHARED PARKING 22 - SPACES REQUIRED (SEE SHARED PARKING DIAGRAM) RAM A. GOEL, PhA, P.E. 7431,!( ' c 1 COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEERS SEAL E M ~ OO V w ~ ~ its ~ W C vV Z xW ~ ~9 ~ p" ~ ~ m e N~ d ~Z ~U Z N~ v~ STORPri MANHLILE P.IM EL..=4,79 ~ 1NV,EL,=1,94 N ~ o~ . INV.EL.,=1,84 S STORM MANHOLE -ate INV,EL.=1,94 E ~ ~ ~ W RIM EL.=4,71 INV.EL.=1,94 1~J INV.EL, 5 p INV~EL.,=1,46 S vV z W ~ - = r a~~ ~ INV,EL, 1,66 W J 1 tip" r ~ ~ . ~ c~ • e OOM? ~ r WPP D~ ' ~ t w r 0 r ~J ~ , ~ ~ M -off ENT 1G~ ~EMc ~ ~t ~ Wa ~ ~ i/ p,SP 1µv ~ a ~ ~ 6 ~ d ~ ~ v? A t Z c~ o ...--"~i o rn S~ R ~ " ' ~ ~ . / RI y O ~ ~ ~ ~ b '*1 .a 'A i IT4 " ° ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ -n .n i'... , C~rac. ~ 1. a ~ ~ ~ r ~ . m ~ ,,4. PP ~ -r,, ;y: .:r9 ° ~ EB #5936 ~ o ~ i, ~ V ~o v .1. r E i0 B -''~a ~ ti vl . ~ y _ ISI1aNDCAPEC & \ PGflN~ NDS \ IA iION ti ~ N A S IRRIVI AyPER \ 0 PR ~ E~ & i C S PE ENiS A'' I MW = M17NITERING WELL. 7 A UIREMTIONS - •Y~~• (ll STORY C.B.S. REE CIFICA ~ _ 1 ~a . P s / 647 2 ADDRESS N~, / NERCU~ ° ~ y'~ NES Comm.: 0639 RE<A15•63MSF ~ lJ~i .r 6 b COMMEREwE ~ j NiIGN VA NETAI37 5F roe ~ EW DATE 5' 1 ro 537 LEV rn N ~ 9DXi. Drawn By: B.J.V. u; ~ E ,yam;; 20X -n 5~ ~X o EW ~K ~ ~ 1`,~ Checked By: H.G. ~ NONC~ WA ~ 6 c ;N fr- 9 j;~ ' ~ o N bJALK ~ ~ ~ Issue Date: 11108106 ' ; ~ I ~i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v :I U ` Revisions: i TD No, Date Descri tion - ~ PAIN i; ~ N yEIEDW NO ;;p'N~ IpEN ~ AREA iF~1R. AE.~~;.•. ING I cv_ '•IN~ f~.~f.~ PARK O ~ G • . G12 ~ m yy t2 L f ~ Nr ~~61~p~ ~~1) ~ .~P C1 Ij~;~;7,7 ~ "1 `~j Ji2° 1~,pG~~`` ~ f5 45 Q ~W,- I ~ ° 5 Ilv a STAIR 0 ~ ~ T1 ' ~ ~ s~ : ice' •~~i - -v S :a ;'r AA 5 r Z $H J 1'} a rRa : M:~:~ (c~ r ~ A~~ ~ yo-,:;. 6 - ~ I 0 µP~ CPS F P 5 ~ M i.~N A RA 1. i N,G. . 16 5 A NEW ' LL ~ 1 r • / EN a ~g 1. iRASN REA Gas DP ~ ,~W ~ 9 1AGING A ~ °13 lg „ 298.0 S ~ '»~il; MET & N12 ,QQ W ,~W 29 r ~ 0~ CPS c1~ ' S, ~ ~ ~ E~, _ ~ 6~ ° SIGNi o F E.41ci ~ 5121 L ~N - D r s ZD X2 IrY ~ : % 6, 4~ ~ ~g~ C vlslell. E (nP,) ~ ('~tyC, S~tD -5 ~ S~~~Y~g,2~ Cl 1 M ~ NN C ` '.i~•• .~--'off D ~ Div o h ~ .r 'w~P.- ~ Ae~gs~~-~~ r r cv 5TU STD~'~ ne ~ i ~ 3 ~ ~ E ~Jp3 ~ ,r v v G~~S~. .5~5 ~ ~C ~ CUNT' O ~ N r~ ,a,a t,0 ~ (G~~ v i N t]' ~ ~ ~ ~ (lh v ~ 6 ~ ,E. ~ l5 ~ ~ a U F ,F N'~' ' ~ 4 QQ 9 ~ c. coy ~ .9 1.1~ ~ ~ ~s~~`I'~ ~ ~ ~ RE ~ ~ w E N G? ~ / ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ tJ J Q Q w~ o " F~~JA D T 1 G l r 0' RI UE (P ~ z ~ b O ~ M M • ~ ® ~ 70 W OC W ~ -1 ~ ~ a _ C~ a W NOTE. F -2 VE AL RAN HALL INI M L A M MU SCALE: 1 "=20' ~ Z z a ~ ~ a3 I T VA Q ~ ~a AL EXI TI DRIV AY L E HALL B V ER M E . ZO 0 ~ 10 .ro..o { w r Y . THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF yERVI(i ANDgRXLL REMAIN THE' PROPERTY OF THE ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED PUBLISHED `'ft USED:, IN AVY'WAY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. (dLOfftq .2067 N911PI)BLISHED • D1N , I . F 007 C2ml RAM A. GDEL, Ph.D., P,Et. 1431° COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL t~, 0 0 S v a P/L 0 N$ T P & ALVE X• 8 aim rmm~ ~ a vV o ggm®®® g N Z ~W g m g a ® NEW 6'X6 X2" EX, GRADE g g sa m m CHLORINE • ~`~_NEW 2'X2" 0 ' @ P/L TION 6 ® ELBOW ~i ~ ~ POINT TBo BUILDING ~ 6& S N W 3 STEM WALL ~ / 6~ GV ~ NEW 1-1/2" M &BFP e ~0 ~ NEW 6" OJ,P, p ~a NEW 2" PVC _ A, ~ ° ~n PO~YWRAPPED DO . W, ~ ° I 36 MIN. COVER lu d M U - I >k • 36 MIN, - i - NEW 6" COVER ~ m~ 1- ~ Z - tl~ I 0~°: _ I I I-I DCVA Z ~ I ' n NEw -I I ; e'~ - - " CV STORM hIANHOLE ~ v~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NEw s" Pvc RIM EL.=4J ~ - I ~ ,,e:• 1,5 SANITARY MANH LE ® ® DR 14F V F _ ` ~ - - NEW FDC ~ 36 MIN, IN _L,-L94 N ~ 1NV.EL.-1,84 ~ STORM MANI-IC]LE E~IM EL.=4,62 9 COVER . ~ ROCK - INV,EL~=0~S8 fd ~ -'nom INV.EL,=1,94 E - = i F~IM EL.=4J1 _ NEw 4" Pvc e e e INV.EL=1,94 1°I ~~5 RAP J ~n ~1 e ~ ~ - INV.EL,=1,56 N INV,EL, •0,24 ~ DR 14F ~9 / i i = -°Rf _ ~ t'~' RAP ~ / ~ i` w ~I~ 4,5° INTERCEPTOR SWALE INV,EL.~-1,46 ~ INV,EL,=0,52 N, .,o~"~ , - P I - bJ INV,EL,-0,42 covE - r-- r= 'y TJ SECTION A A .1,66 ,o~ r 0 H INTERCEPTOR S ~ i i N RT _ N.T.S, - .~-Q~ ~ ! / SECTION B B _ - , N,T.S. WPP SANI SANITARY MANI~NL~ ~ w°' - ~ RIM - RIM EL,=4.72 ~ V SANI fARY MANHOLE ~~PP r _ ~ ~ _ - INV,EL,=0,84 N ~ ~ Z ~ ,a = I N V,E RIM EL.=4,67 r- 6H`'1 ~ , ~-~'~~Ip,'r~p~ INV,EL,=0,73 S vc ~JF ~ s - ~ INV,EL_~-0,12 S ~ ~ ~ fi~rf / g0 p ~1CS ~ ,F - ~ ~ ~ - , pH A ~ \s INV,EI_~-0.57 E < AS v~!-~ „X6" ~f ~,®m ~ c - =f ~ / ~^1 I NEW B ~ \ g g ~ g ° J I1 P `°RC -o R V v 1 Q _ 5 1& r LIFTING ANCHOR ,i , ~ , - ~ \,u m P ' / ~ / NEW SAN. S, M,H, ' ~ 6 \ ~ o m g PLACED AT 1' SAWCUT TO BE CAULKED l~~RC ~j ~ ~ ~ C-C SPACING - A RIM EL. 4.0 ~ ~ ~ m m g ~ ~ z 3' MIN, LAYER ~ ~ ~ 36 d4l ~CTIVER 8"X 1 1 m ®m ~ ,g g g E - g 3/4' WASHED GRAVEL BOTTOM OF n ~ LF pF T&~ g „j - ~ m g ~ 3' CDNG 18 VAULT EL,=2,50 N W 1055AN vd. m g ~s ! r. o ~ PVC 'Z A 9Ep ®g g ~ rF 4.61 ~ 1 ® ; Q ~ ~ ~ ~b,• ®p h. , n X g , 1~-M"' NG WAS - .61 ' ~ ~ EV g g ¢ ~ ~ ! ~ o ~ v ~ FILTER FABRIC J~ 0 W/PERMEABILITY CDEF, , ~ / ®®g q P 4 ~ Q j 6 PVC PERF, R ®g „ „ w 19,~(~ - OF 0,20 CM/SEC . u , . ~ " g g g " q a „w 4 _ . e,• ' : o• ~ " ' PIPE W/SOCK Ew S X6 ~ . m ® NEw , • ix`' ~ , 1 2' 15 00 y ~ t I I,E. = 1.75 a N tY 1 1 E ~ e N ~ ~ EB #5936 v ~ v 1 z ~ •o FILTER MEDIUM NEW SAN. S, M,N, ~dJ&V ®g ~ i-P ~rI~E NEW FHA RIM EL 4,0 ~ g ~ m 1 N t , ? V ~y 6" CONCRETE I V. EL, 0, 0 t>a ® a CLF~~,~~' 1 1I2 DOGHOUSE m ®g ~EP~' NEEW V ~ "6 ~ ~ O~w' 0 mm~' ~ ~9 p MIN, C NOTE: g g ®g 1 , ~ - 36 ~ z,~~ MW = MC7NITERING WELL. FITLIMESTDNEROCMEROCK OREOTHERICALCULM CARBONARESED mggm®~ ® ~g ~ by , Ew 1" (1) STORY C.B.S. AGGREGATE. egg ~~gg ~ - M &BFP ADDRESS No. 647 ~ ggmg® 1" ELV 5.85 '''C,O, ~ r UNDERDRAIN DETAIL a ° , 4 , ~ NEw BFP FF• ~ & ~ ~Lr T ~ i J^ NES Comm.: 0639 b N,T,S, cn g m ® bpi 3,99 M " NtION VA ~ g ~ o `~7 ya E1E , ~ m ~ v ~ / LV• y,85 ~ rn v NEW 0'X1,5 Igo Drawn By: B.J.V. ~ E 1 9 ' FHA m 1 o r FF' B 2p X TILE ~ ~X, .a 1 O " DRAINAGE RppF 1 12 OWN. ~ 's, qs ~ TIE p 1 \ v 10 ~ Checked By: N.G. 1 - ~ N ~ ~ 1'S ~ VC SA ~ 1~ NEW FDC p 1 EW • (Trn•~' CONL, / 1 ~ i VE o o/ 1 D ®6„ 0 N WALIt ~ `A EL, 3.75 a ~ Issue Date: 11108106 ' 1 ` 's 5.7 3 ~ o ~ „ SP°m v 2 h E ~ ~ ' ILE p ~ S~ 3' ~ F. pF 5 i „DRAINAGE: - pOF j Revisions: x, ,AN 1`~, ~ , I,E, 16 5. 7 12 IE pOw pE EL, 2,90 C 3, 6 - PSER~ 9 = a • ~ 6 .D S GRAZE 10 t pISC 4.6 ~ No, Date Descri tion c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 75 f, 5.4 a' ACCES a o pRAIN -o ~s ~ ~ GRAZE N 8 ~ a.? . d' ~ --p o N Q I N 4 25 V W IR CREST d 2 Lp, ESS Cp ~ 792' L E ~-~-2. ~ i 2 ACCNpH ~ ) ~ 0 " G`D C1 I >f N E l2"PALM 2.90 g as . , ~ „ ~ 4: 6 A o ~ .2 ? 3 vER S}2,15 ,~7 ~ 1 = 51216 _,~w, ° - '~'O G 4" ' CESS Cp 1192' L l GREASE BAFFLE TO BE g I v ~ 9 ~ AGENAN n d N C. D. 1/4 THICK ALUMINUM ~ w/STAINLESS STEEL ANCHORS EA E ~ p o L v,~. ' W~017 F N~ ~'cas I M ~ ~ p ~ vCMC A 4 5. A - ' P TAIL L DE GAFF A 1 5 ) A H cP F Y + ~ A ar- AS l.~ ~ CY~p),..~-~'_.~ Gam ~ Q 7 ~ . - ~ . 1 5, ,y. ~ - WALL + , . - ~ A ~ GN - / ~ 4 I / N E ~ ? A ~ 4 - ~..,,r ~ ~s~ 2g ~ ~ p~g'I~-,. - 0 3'19 ~ gg.Ot 2g~ , l ~ ~ 1~ 11~R l ~ a a ~ ~r • 1 1 o, a MET r11~ 1 , 4„W 2 .~HNI fAf~Y PIANHOLE 9 ~ .r- ~ F~~~~- ~ s 2 15 a z'-o" ,RIM EL,=3,80 ',~3 ~ ~ e~ 6' wa C RY ~ ) STO~Y,~; 5 ~ I INV,EL,-065 W ® tl - . i TRAFFIC GRATE _ , ~ '"~~1' F F INV,EL,-0,85 E 3.5 \o ~ ~ Cl rr ELEV, 3,75 v., ~ „ INV~EL,=0,85 PJ&S / r- ~ ~~1~ NN ~ ~ 8 MASONRY OR ~ (p - ~ 1 ~ ~ ~---1~~ D APPROVED R.C. GREASE SKIMMER ~;.r-~` ~-,.---'7 ~ n PREFAB (SEE DETAIL _ n • ® ~pE. y Q E .5 6, ~ ,~2 L~ ~ T ~L ..B•S Cl~ STD ~ i' c? ~ p h BOTTOM OF SLOT ~ PJ n 1 i y Z C ,F.E~ G~ v ELEV, 2.90 , V C d d L- S C . Iz" o,I,P, ~ 6 P ~ .an CON , ~ INV, ELEV. 1.75 ~ t•~•.,• , i~ r' . r W . D 1 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ , ~ s" Q n o z C J a J w ~ ® ~ ~ ~-a--l.-- Lpq~OSC 2~ ca IY '"7'-N 6" PVC UNDERDRAIN U1~1~ (ZED INV, ELEV. 1.75 ~"Gj T> C IBC, In ~ ~ ~ ~ Q C: ~ Z NOTE, NORTH GUTTER SHALL BE OVERSIZED AND ~ ~ ~ v ~ s ~ DOWNSPOUT TO TIE INTO DRAINAGE TILE ' f pU ~ a , NnY1 ~ ~ ~a ^`0~ mg ® AY~p) n n ~ `~F ~J ~ H-( 6 ~ R~~ f~~ ~E ~ ACCESS COVER ACCESS COVER W ~ NEENAH R-1792-FL NEENAN R-1792-FC ? ~ p ~ ~ UE ~.d ~I ~ STORM 5TRUCI'URE TABLE ~ ~ N.T.S. GR,4TE ~ ~ NEENAH R-3403-F W - STRUCTURE TYPE INV. ELEV. # GRATE. ELEV EL 4, 70 - -d.. a. , .'ea. n ~ ~ a' •~.a • ~ • 1 TYPE P MANHOLE 3,7 9,68 TOP EL, 4,70 EL, 4,00 - 15' ~ ~ 8" CONC. ~ • ° ° .,~b..•', LOW CHORD EL, 4,00 MODIFIED F.D.D,T TYPE "C" INLET ~ D,H.W, ° t' ~ ~ SEE CONTROL STRUCTURE EL, 3,75 ' ° CONTROL STRUCTURE ••°9 DHW 2 ~ 3.75 9, 75 ~ _ Z c~ 9 DHW EL. .75 SCALE: ~ ~~-2O' a FOR DETAILS ° - ~ • STORM PIPE SCHEDULE BOTTOM 8" coNC, STRUCTURAL OE51 N BY OTHERS `a: LENGTH 3 PIPE THROUGH WALL ELEV, 2,50 ry ' 15' STRUCTURE SIZE & TYPE SLOPE(S) WlTN WATER TIGHT CONNECTION 2.50 ~ 15' ° N ~ ; 15' 20' 20' 20' 15' ® ~ Q 7 C FROM-TO (Fr) e , ° ° : .~4 .f ' ~ . d I 4 F,D,O,T INLET TYPE 'C" 4.5 2.60 ' °a EX, M.H. 1 91 LF f2" DIP 0.249' 2 CLEAR ~ _ pD . 20 0 10 20 40 ~ ~ ~ ~ - 7 F 1 " „ INV, 1.75 1Q ® 2 L 2 DIP 0.26 5 F.D.O. T. INLET TYPE C 4.5 2,85 f ~ EL. 2.50 30 - ® 30 LF 8" PVC 0.339 PIPE THROUGH WALL WITH 6 WATER TIGHT CONNECTION 2.50 8" CONC. EL. 1,80 and . a. `d ° a. ° , < " a ..°a < d a na da ~ °v e, °a THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN l'TH`~RBNERT(( 8 ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USE 7~NY WkY WtTN U + 90, S+, THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. ©COPYRI~hITIOJh- IV~TLIIiD, g B 30 CF 8" PVC 1.179' 12° ADS NYLOPLAST DRAIN 0 0 7 ' t Is'. .:y N3° 15 LF 8 PVC W124" NS-25 GRATED LID 4.25 2.55 - " RETENTION VAULT 0 0.319 PIPE THROUGH WALL 8 W/ WATER TIGHT CONNECTION 2.50 N.T.S. AULT w 3 V LONGITUDINAL CROSS SECTION N.T.S. RAM A. GDEL, Ph.D., P.E. #47, , COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID LI;s EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEERf L, o P,C ` rat '•~Lil" , SIEC~I®N 8, ~®WNS][~I1f~ 29 S~U~]EI, 1$ANGIE 15 IEAS~', flaIN]EI.]LAS C®UN~.'~, ]F]L®][$III~A STORM MANHOLE " vc ~ RIM EL.=4.79 ~ c $ P' = ANITARY MANHOLE - N e Pv Q S INV.EL.-1.94 N ~ NOTES: fi STORM MANHOLE RIM EL.=4.62 INV.EL.=1.84 S°a ;;,=i ' IGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF % 1 V L.=0.52 N °NW iNV.EL.=1.94 E , i ~ 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY L RIM EL.=4.71 N 'E _ .r ,FRCP POINSETTA AVENUE, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, HAVIN( _ INV.EL.=0.24 S INV.EL.-1.94 W CP 15 BEARING OF SOUTH 12°15'00" EAST. =REOF, HAVING A o INV.EL.-1.56 N INV.EL.=0.52 E oHW ' 15 R ]RTH AMERICAN VERTICAL o INV.EL.=1.46 S / ~ . r? 2. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON (N. A. V. D.) NORTH AMERICAP INV.EL.=0.42 W / ~ DATUM OF 1988. INV.EL.=1.66 W ONW ~ ~ 3. BENCHMARK -PINELLAS COUNTY BENCHMARK MAP No. 148, BRASS DISK a ~ ~ POST, STAMPED F-3, PINELLAS COUNTY ELEVATION = 3.508 (1929 DA1 BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE 508 (1929 DATUM). LABINS OHW P~ ~ i ELEVATION = 2.72 (1988 DATUM). i ITLE. THERE MAY BE o i ~ ~ A 4. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE. THERE h R s ~ Wpp A' Y ! ~ ~ SANITARY MANHOLE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. HW N~ i SURVEY. i ~ / - 5. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: M ~ ~ ~ ~ RIM EL.-4,72 I ~ i •s INV.EL.=0.84 N COMMUNITY PANEL No.: 125096 0007 D SANITARY MANHOLE WPP ~ i , ~ ~ ~ FLOOD ZONE: ZONE AE (E ,11 ) ti _ w o % i ) INV.EL.=0.73 S L I o . RIM EL.-4.67 off y ~ W PYIP ~ A - REUISED MAP DATE: SEPTEMBER 03, 2003 I i INV.EL.=0.27 N N ~ o „PVC , , -OF NT •s - •s, INU.EL. 1.16 E ~ , IGH~ NEME ~ INV.EL.=0.86 W m INV.EL.=0.12 S ~ , , 80 R TPA S - I _ o ~ pHA~ ~ AR1E ~ •s INV.EL.-0.57 E < ~ ~ AS ~H , o ~ o ! rn WID s $ P-i 15 RC ~ ~-1 A i (~~RCP n As ~ ~ HP 'j n 1a ~ ~ , SP ro R ~ ytL ~ ' A / ^7 o 9 n ' / ~ ix~~ ~ roo h i ~ s2 ~ •Sy 4 8~ LEGEND i ~ ~ S i •S CPP 0 =DENOTES WOOD POWER POLE ~ , x ) -DENOTES GUY WIRE & ANCHOR O Z i TBM No. 1 ,5°~ 0 =DENOTES CONCRETE POWER POLE ~ ° SN/D •2A ~ =DENOTES X CUT 1 ~ ~ RwV L =3. 0 =DENOTES IRON PIPE G~ u ® E 92 1~R ().1~ I • =DENOTES FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD ~ (n sS p~p,NS K FIP /2 ® =DENOTES CONCRETE MONUMENT , C, W AI- tN0 ID) FCM =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT O ~ O 6~ 'CON ~ 0.02'N - ~ u') 5 0 (P~ FIR -FOUND IRON ROD , sWV ~~g,2 0.04 W FCIR =FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD LOT 10 ~fi ,00~'W FIP =FOUND IRON PIPE BLOCK 84 ~ fi `~s o' 12°15 (1) STORY C.B.S. FPIP =FOUND PINCHED IRON PIPE r ~ ~ ° ~ N FH =FIRE HYDRANT -p 1 WV ~ ~ ADDRESS No. 647 OR8 =OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 0 " " o PG =PAGE ro FCM 3x3 ~ PB =PLAT BOOK ~ r.I I 6 1'tM) ^~6 0 S 0.02' N MW ~ (P) _ PLAT FAR ~2 60.2 6 O (M) MEASURED (NO ID) rA 9x 0.02' W e p cF) =FIELD Q° S ~ ~CD~ =CALCULATED DEED MW 9~ ~ FND =FOUND 1 ' LLF.EL. =LOWEST LIVING FLOOR ELEVATION CONC. O.1~' CONC. ~ MW =MONITORING WELL FND• X CUT APRON WALK WM = WATERMETER (NO ID) I O WV =WATER VALVE NORTHEAST CORNER N RCP =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE OF LOT 10, BLOCK 84 ~ 3.87 V A C A N T LOT 2 ~ RMV =RECLAIMED WATER VALVE ~ ~ d ]D -IDENTIFICATION S~ ~~h 8"PALM MW BLOCK 84 ~ ~ SPKND =SET PARKER KALON NAIL & DISK } 9 (J) Q ,0 4 6 FPKND _ FOUND PARKER KALON NAIL ~ DISK N J A R) ..r --o LB _ LICENSED BUSINESS S o PP 4.7 CONC CONCRETE _ _ _ _ ss LOT 1 LOT 3 CPP_... = CONCRETE.POWER POLE - - ~ - = PERMANENT HEFERENCE MONUMENT ~ ~ N~ ~ BLOCK 84 BLOCK 4 PRM ~ ~~o ~ z 8 O ~,zo o ~ 'cP) i r1r C~ 12 PALM , Q E 45 tM 1~~( Z 2150 q.15 o c~ S1 0 .Og E a 812 16y N ~ MW , o ,,ti off FCIR /2 H ~ 'tn tN0 ID) 6 ~P) O ~ ~ ~ p 5g • WP FCM 3..x3.. ~2.y'~~~ TBM No.2 0.29 N A~ (NO ID) i ~ SET 60d NAIL M 0.09E ENS j 1 „ 15.26 , ) EL.-5.11 >-IA~~ tp) ONC. o ' 43 W 00 lP ' lP) ~ 10' pSP , ~~~Y C , ~ 11 ~ ..W 15 5g.6 ~ 15 ,0 ZZ S7 4 46 00 ~ 21 s ~ S~ l a'` gg' CM) ORY ~ ~ ~~p) a 3'19 W 9$ DO N C.B•S• .~cn ~ 59.6 0 (p) 49~€ N12 1 , 0,. 0 ~ N F EL. rn SANITARY MANHOLE ~ ~ 9.~ ® 0 0~ N ~.F o 'R 'S ~ "E 11 FENCE. 12 15 S. N o a .96 0> _ ~ o o ~g 00 ~ , Wooo H N C.6 • 5 RIM EL.-3.80 S ~y• ,y`' g12 ,y6 6 ONC• CORY 25 ° _ LOT 15 INV.EL,=0.65 W ~ HW C ~1) S E~,=5• ~ - 3.3 N L•F •F' ~ BLOCK 84 INV.EL,-0.85 E FCM 3"x3"1 'A ~ 2 n N o0 INV.EL.=0.85 N&S (NO ID) 1 HW 1.0' ~ o o NN 0.05'N ~ H 2 Z Z ,0 N ~h 1 PE ,t N o n 50 cP ~ 0.05 W WP H PNpSGA r t1) STOR N .CORY ~ o o v N C•O•S' o l1) S •S. v o~ /7 I FCIR 5/e" ' ~'~''6 N O N .F •F•E'~' C.8 v NC, 6"PAC PLS 2865 N to o ~ .4.85 CONC• LOT 18 CO (P1 i ~A C g.S• .o ~ ~ BLOCK 84 LOT 17 I.EY C H r STORY .4.g5 - $ v 0' 15 ~ 6 Pv ~~M) i t1) EL, m 21. o, BLOCK 84 FCM 3x3 H 60.05 ~ N ~.F •F rn 0 tP) N ~ (NO ID) 60. n o ONC• SPKND HW ~n o - 6' ~ 9 C I rn 44 C• tx•°c a°` LOT 18 LB 6928 -0 1 ,y N CON FCM 3"x3" ~ ~ J CppS BLOCK 84 (NO ID) n ~ o LPNpS ry cr ~ RED > rn CONE cno ~ ONC•, LOT 19 ~ o C BLOCK 84 r? ~ ~ a Z LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 •s 0 o A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE ' JTH, RANGE 15 EAST, NN LOT 20 CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICI BLOCK 84 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS ORE PARTICULARLY SCALES 1"=20' ~o (P) ~ -W p,1' ~ -OF ~ LOTS 1AND 2 BLOCK 84 OF MANDALAY "THE ISLE OF A THOUSAND P~ ~ J ~ ~ I -HOUSAND PALMS", GN v RI N E ~ CLEARWATER BEACH UNIT No.5 CCO 60 V ~ ,A RDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THE A t 0 20 40 )R PLAT THEREOF, V AS RECORDED=°1N PLAT BOOK 20 PAGE 27 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS 0 K N , 0 k A N p? COUNT/Y~~;'FLO{ RECORDS OF PINELLAS lf~~ ...W.. 1 hW..1 4~ S ~ ~ 10 Q FCM 3x3 CON~T~AIi~i,. 1~1,~• - . ,FEET, OR 0.2805 ACRES MORE OR LESS. OR LESS. ' SCALE: n_ , FIELD BO LOTS ~ ~ BLO ~]L]EIN ~ S~.AU~ SiT VEIyING INC. L ~'fE ~F~ LD 08K. S, TEMBER 14, 2006 1 -20 Cg S~ ~ s 20~ FIELD BOOK: 99152 MAN PROFESSION SURV YORS AN ~G~UND~RY ~ eta ' DRAWN BY: DALAY iTNYT No. 6 AL E D PLANNERS ~ • ~ " = BAK PAGES: 9 09/15/06 8018 OLD COUNTY ROAD No. 54 T®~®(~$~,~~~I(1 , 3AK PAGES: 64-65 ROGERS BEACH DEVELOPMENT. INC. NE1N PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34853 BRU ~'KLEIN P 052 CHECKED BY: TC FLOR, RED IS E E~ S YO 1 ADDED ADDITIONAL TOPO 11/14/06 BAK P.O. BOX 676 OFFICE:727-834-8140 FAXs 727-834-8180 :y~' t,~J R R TC SU~V~iY NOT V~= 1,TH 'T NAT R A CRYSTAL BEACH. FLORIDA 34881 t'D fl G U E ND ORIGINAL RAISED JOB No SHEET No NO.~ REVISION BY~ LB 6928 seaL• :APL ELI " CENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 050118.2 >,a ~w,ye 18.2 SHEET No. 1 OF 1 p' X02 'I 02'-O" V, M h ~ M ~ ~ ~ T-O" g'.4' M M 6 -4 7 -0 h J "STEP ACKS" h ~ .h.. ~ Q ~t " ~ W r ~ Z n N a ~ ~ ~ T " 53,,4„ a I2 ~ ~ o n~ 2 -1 114 ~ Z S n A ROOF TRU$$.RO Q r + p ~ t~ i A A A A I ~ ~ a oG PROPER C LINE o ° 42,,8„ ~ ~ a C C C - TDPOF4TxFLOOR F ~ ~ ~ C C ate. sn. ? A A•INNER PEACE ~ 3' C A ~e ~ ('J Q ~ Z $fUCCOON . W _ ~ a p-INNER PEACE DL E C C DI LUl1 - _ ~ e~ ST000OONCONCDLOCN. A arAIp WELL WALL ALUM WINDOWS a 3RD ATN AND fi7N FLOORS PGT HOR128LIDERB IMPACT GLASS „ ~ oc 1 c c 32 -0 z F A' TOP OF ~RD FLOOR Q ~ A/~ C C ? 0 C J d. ,l"Y C a A ~ m ~ J ~ 21' o TOP OF 3ND FLOOR a~ ~ ~ ~ C B B B C C C B ? ~ O ¦ C g C ~ IR B HLs r B BL K ~ d' C fD ~ .'10,.8„ o B C-MERCURY ~I'~J TRIM I - - TOP OF 78T FLOOR O span to aeroae ~ Ppen to aeroue Open to geroae ~ o~ open fa aarsae pHBCP0~3 9-198- ~ O 00000 I E ~ B .A$E FLOOD ELEVATION c I ac I I I E ~O7'T PA M8 E DTT PA NTS ' B V B ~ R-BEIRRA KNOW OA E•BEIRRA SNOW B b--I B C EI N Pl N 6 B70000 ON eDNC RLDCN B B B arueeo ox CONC SLDCN ' ' 5.85 AVD FF FLOOR OARA06 COPYRIGHT ©2006 BY PATRICIA M. STOUGH 1 EAST ELEVATION ~ _ ° ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION - 61 OF FACADE = P .a 2 WEST (FRt~NT) ELEVATION C-1 SCALE: 3132 1.0 ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION = 79.4% OF FACI4DE C-1 SCALE: 3132" = 1'-0" ~ ~ ~ a -~aa m m~~ H H m m W W > > N ~ H H V V m m N OG D ~ G.C VV 6T-4" NOTES: o00 1. ELECTRICAL METERS ARE LOCATED N O r r ABOVE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION- NO ~ ~ N ~ ~ r O PLATFORM NECESSARY. N M 2. A MINIMUM OF 8'-2" VERTICAL CLEARANCE SHALL EXIST FOR VAN ACCESSIBILITY PER ADA STANDARDS ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE REMOVED. 3. ALL UNITS TO CONTAIN (2) MASTER BEDROOM J m SUITES AND 1 STUDYIBEDR00M, (3) BATHROOMS. e A W ? A A A A V o COLOR LEGEND a~ W A - - ¦ ? A -INNER PACE 7443 ? A W ~ W A c c ~ 03 ~ C C B- SEIRRA 1 NOW 8475 ~ a C - MERCURY( 8260 Z a~ A C A o aN~ ° A ~ ~ ~ ~ V v C ? ? C 1F. m 0 OL W ? m ¦ C C C B C C B C p C p w d w W C C C F h a 0 ENTRY DALE BELOW OPEN TO GARAGE TO OARAOe OPEN M OARAOE OPEN TO OARAOfi OPEN 70 GARAGE w 05-14 C B C $•$EIRIU$NOW C C 10 8$~2S B ~ B ~ B B $TUCCOON CONC BLOCK B B B B - RYP 18T AND IIND FLOORI 3 SOUTH (ROYAL) ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION = 70.4% OF FACADE 4 NORTH ELEVATIC I ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL DECORATION = 71% OF FACADE ~ C-1 SCALE: 3/32" 1'-0" C-1 SCALE: 3/32" 3132" = 1 '-0" 'Rogow 4 102'-6" 67'-4" 25'-2" ~ 19'-0" 25'-4" 19' 2 10' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - , o . I I. ~ IJM S ER rl ~ ~ ~ ~ I WIC C PAD ~ ~ f,' N I i . I RETAIL(COMMERCIAL ' ~ I 715.63 sq ft , ~ ~ ` , ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ , . . ~ U I i ~ 18 SPACES , ~ L I ~ ' ~ t 1" ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 c:~ ~ I o ~ I ~ r I I w 1 o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r I CONC. ~ rw I BALC0611Y o I O ~ ~ d' ;ENTRY I ~ ROPERTY LINE 01D~I~' "'Y'®~ I ' .m.mt I I 2 045.34 s ft ~ q I 1 RETAILICOMMERCIAL i 537.37 sq ft ~ ~ _ : ; . . 1 ELEV " IR F m I BA .CONY "1::, : ~ , ~ p' ~ ~?;L;~':':.:'~:`';;`: ~y li ~ L••.,... , LL Q r Y I I 2,045.34 sq ft ~;1;%~;.~;`:':. ; :~~'•.'~~'`•:`;~'`.'°~:`~;t::•';;~.:;,~.;'~::~,•,t` • COPYRIGHT ©2006 B I ALCOA~ •~;[;:r~~~~.~~s:~;,.~~:`• `~;,''~y,,;<• BY PATRICIA M. STOUGH _ I ®~,~d. 1 GARAGEI GROUN[~ LEVEL A-1 SCALE: 1116" = 'I'-0" 6 ROOF PLAN 5 UNITS 4011402 A-1 SCALE: 1116" = 1'-0" A-1 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" ~ ~ ~ H Q m m ~ H H m m W W > > ~ OC H H V V 00 m I EG OG 0 D I xD. 1 ~ ® ~ O O O I 1 Q N0. I BALCONY BALCONY ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 1 I BALCONY ALB CONY I N I ~ O ~ ~ 1 BALCON ' ~ ~s t~D_. ~ r r O I I 1 PROPERTY BALCONY I urle COMMERCIAL RODF N 1'/ M BELOW I I a I ~~0~ ~®e~ ~®e~ I v~a~ ~ o~ y 2 325.29 s ft ~ q } I m ' ~ ELEV o I ROOM ~ ~ . _ ELEV FIR H ELEV IP E UIP ~ ~ W ~ ELEV ~ I BTUDY LAUNBm a s~•o^ ! ~~W O.H. aaa 1 ' ~D~A~ ~ 0 a ~ ~ I GREAT ROOM ~ ~ 'e 1 W; 0 1 I MASTER BEDROOM x1 I 2,535.25 sq ft ~ M~ ~ I 2 325.29 s ft 2,325.29 sq ft , q I COMMERCIAL ROOF I BlLOW ~ A I W 1 BALCONY I W BALCONY I ~ BALCONY I ~ 1 1 MASTER BEDROOM R2 BALCONY W BALCON ~ A@ C~0 X ® ® ~ • ex 1 " 1 I W F . I i w N I ~ I I 1 I I I 8.. 34'-4.. 8.. 16~ I 1 ' / 2 \ lll'~ITS 1011102 1 `'d~.'~ ems, 3 UNITS 201/202 4 UNITS 3011302 A-1 SCALE: 1116" = 1 '-0" A-1 SCALE: 1116" = 1'-0" A-1 SCALE: 1116" = 1 '-0"