Loading...
FLD2006-10057Vy n^an,fli-I_i AnAzpy 490 MANDALAY AVE GIONIS BY THE SEA f f3 i . 1 s.- t v-?2 R : L i ? ` L? .1 ..P isiZ L It -_ s ??• ?? ;? ?? r m - 1 ._.?1 e - - -- 1 !{ L-4 I Nil T AND USE. F D f Ch. E: 3v BOG s c C .ci F ? t ??ar r i /•D"Ei so A , WJOL EEL 6e 13 c.?? ??? rnS! 'Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenu# Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4866 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Mary G. Realty, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 490 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-847-8158 CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: G. Realtv. Inc.: Nick Gionis. President Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 E-MAILADDRESS: keithakeithzavac.com PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): )PMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Gionis by the Sea PROJECT VALUATION: $4M 490 Mandalay Ave., Clearwater, FL 33767 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 0.40 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 17,457.56 See Attachment A DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 9 residential condominium units and 4,350 SF of retail space See Attachment B Page 1 of 8 RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ? s DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TQR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES- N0104 (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A DOPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain tow each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C & D 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment C & D 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attachment C & D 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment C & D 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C & D 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C & D ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 2 of 8 DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district See Attachment E 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Attachment E 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See Attachment E 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See Attachment E 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. See Attachment E 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See Attachment E ORIGIN AL •?v??rcv Page 3 of 8 DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Manual and 4-202.A.21) 'AL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACK OWLEDG;plan OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Storas noted above is included plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURV EY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing bees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arbodsf, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ip LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development (bordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 1.4 2006 Page 4 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) I-4 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; _ All dimensions; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _ All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-vay within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, stone and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. IA SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ Land area in square feet and acres; 17,457.56 sf 5000.00 sf 17,457.56 sf _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 0 _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 9 Gross floor area devoted to each use; 6,255 sf retail 4,350 sf retail _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the 26 40 19 _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, 9 519.56 sf 18,584.82 sf 2,798 sf _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; , Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; _ Building and structure heights; 25 35 80'-11/2" _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 0.90 0.95 0.70 Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 0.35 1.0 0.28 REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2@06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) I )d LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36'x: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) A BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; 0 REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 %X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and aft ched dsjgrl?;,ro ' e photogra a d dimensi area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. VAM? ?j ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/2X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 6 of 8 DEC j 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4202.A.13 and 4-801.C) LIEU .. 4 2006 C3 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING DEPARTMENT • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF CLEARWATER • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based. on. the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation. Engineer's.(ITE) Trip General Manual.. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727<562=4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community. Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 4 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Tr is impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and posWevelopment`levels of service for all adway legs and each turning movement at all intersections. identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate_water supply is available and -todetermine.if any upgrades are required. by the developer due to, the, impact of this.project. The water supply mustbe able to:support the needs.of any required,fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If afire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowlent of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one ofthe following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND N.O.NE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION. MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I; the undersigned; acknowledge that all representations.made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge nd aut orize City representatives to visit and pho graph e pro rty described in this application. r T ------- --- ------ -- Signature of p operty o er or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Svo? o and subs efore me this _2, day of {opr?? , A.D. 20 o t. to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as id tification. Notary pu - - -- - - ---- -- - - My commission expires: C> ?> -7L CC) 0 Page 7 of 8 hey p°? ELI"L:'i3Y_=59 A. HEF.4Ry Notary Pubiic. State of Florida MY COMM, expires Oct. 31. 2008 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED vw 1_ -x ccuu N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on-deed - PRINT full names: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Nick Gionis, President Mary .G Realty, Inc: 2. That (I am/we are) .the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 490 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 9 unit. residential -condominiums and.4,350 sf retail project 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA as.(his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit. has been executed to. induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the. above described.property; 6. That site visit to the property are necessary by City representatives in orderto process this application and the owner authorizes City represen?tativ to visit and photograph the property described in this application; hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. 7. That (W ,t e un rsigned autho F N_ ty' Prope ner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY.OF.PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this _ 2A. u _- day of \ ??V V personally appeared r.?_Qe,?r.,+r. ______ _G1tl?1(?.S t71(l S _ who having-been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ?[? ?a'.nvs? i?}=..t,y^r+M N:l!.vc„wGN!...nsr/.n4ma[h?w'n.nc+nn.?m ELIZASETIi A. HENRY Q A l ,? o c Notary Fupfic. State ofrbrida ?Z- { n My 00111,M. expires Oct, 31, 2008 ] 4, ? Notary Public Signature \10 DD36737., Notary My Commission Expires: -- Page 8 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 ATTACHMENT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 57 THROUGH 63 INCLUSIVE AND THE NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH PARK, ACCORDING TO PLAT IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 42, PUBLIC RECORDS C FLORIDA. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 10.25 FEET OF LOT 64, THEREOF,RECORDED ? PINELLAS COUNTY, • ORIGINAL RECEIVED ATTACHMENT B DEC 1.4 2006 DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Increase in height from 35 ft to 80'-11/2" from FEMA to midpoint of roof. • Reduction in front (north) pavement setback from 15 ft to 0 ft to trash staging. • Reduction in front (north) building setback from 15 ft to 13 ft. • Reduction in north driveway sight visibility triangle. • Reduction in front (east) building setback from 15 ft to 0 ft. • Reduction in side (west) pavement setback from 10' to 5.5'. • Reduction in parking spaces from 40 spaces to 19 spaces. • ORIGINAL RECEIVED G&EG 4 2006 ATTACHMENT C PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSESCITY OF CLEARWATER The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulb coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach and the surrounding area with the proposed Mediterranean architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the retail sales/service and multi-family character of the previously approved or constructed projects. Adjacent to and surrounding this project there are several large scale projects either existing, under construction, or having site plan approval including Belle Harbor, Mandalay Beach Club, Sand Pearl and Pelican Walk. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 9 condominium units and 4350 sf of retail sales/service. The character of the project is an upscale multi-use development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures on both the inside and outside including barrel tile roofs, extensive balconies and building deflection. The parking is within a partially enclosed parking garage which is designed to be perceived as an extension of the residential units above. The project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the other approved projects in the Baymont area. The height and bulk of the project is significantly less the approved project to the north of the site. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Baymont, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 9 unit multi-family and 4350 sf retail project replaces the existing older retail development. There are no proposed uses other than residential and retail sales that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The parking is designed mostly within parking garage and use only one 24-foot wide driveway. The existing parallel parking spaces along Mandalay Avenue are 0 9 retained. The proposed 19 on-site parking spaces will provide two spaces per condominium unit (18 spaces) and one additional parking space allocated to the retail. The remaining parking spaces required for the retail space will be provided by adjacent and surrounding on-street parking. The parking reduction is consistent with the submitted parking study that reviews the surrounding on-street parking availability around the property. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development The surrounding parcels along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont include recently approved multi-family and multi-use developments with similar Mediterranean style architecture and height. The proposed development seeks to maintain the same up-scale character of the new projects colors, character, size and bulk. 6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage. The project only contains 9 residential units and 4350 sf of retail space. It is anticipated that the retail space will provide sales and service to the tourist oriented area and maintain similar hours as the existing retail center across Mandalay Avenue. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ATTACHMENT D APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC LAND USE TO WHICH THE WAIVER IS REQUESTED 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. The increase in height from 35-feet to 80'-11/2" allows for the construction of the 9 units and 4350 sf of retail sales/service to be constructed. The front of the retail facade is located along the Mandalay sidewalk to promote tourist traffic. The residential unit facades are stepped back significantly from the first floor building allowing significant relief on all sides of the building. The site plan is also improved by the elimination of the driveways along Mandalay Avenue and reduction of total driveways to one proposed entrance on Baymont Street. The increase in height also improves the building facade by allowing significant relief and balconies along all sides of the building while still providing market driven unit sizes. b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. The building utilizes the first floor of the building to provide enclosed on- site parking to provide the required 2 spaces per unit. The parking garage is partially enclosed by the building walls and located behind the retail shops. The facade is designed to resemble the remainder of the retail and residential facade. The access to the property has been reduced from the two current driveways on Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, to one full access on Baymont Street. This will reduce the access points along Mandalay Avenue, being a major thoroughfare. C. The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The lot area of 17,457.56 sf exceeds the minimum lot area of 10,000 sf and does not require a reduction request. d. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street. The existing driveways accessing Mandalay Avenue will be removed and replaced by one driveway on Baymont Street, which is not classified as an arterial street. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 2@06 o;ANNING DEPARTMENT ;T,, of C'.EARWATER e. Off-street parking: 1. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of signicant portions of the building for storage of other non parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; 2. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level fagade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. The proposed project provides 19 parking spaces in the first floor of the building behind the retail shops. This meets the City requirement of 2 spaces per units with an additional space to serve the retail shops. The location of the project along Mandalay Avenue allows for convenient access to the Trolley and public bus system. In addition, the area is convenient to local restaurants, shops and stores by foot thereby reducing the dependency on vehicular transportation. The area is utilized primarily by tourists who travel by foot. The proposed parking is partially screened by the first floor building walls from Mandalay Ave. The walls are shown on the colored renderings to be constructed from the same materials as the remainder of the building and painted Smokey Topaz to match other elements of the residential portion of the building. There are also several windows along the first floor that match the residential windows above. The parking is screened from Baymont by the use of a screen hedge and palm trees. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • ORIGINAL RECEIVED _C 2'i" 2006 ATTACHMENT E PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT CITY OF C1EARWATER PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The proposed uses included within the project are attached dwellings and retail sales and service. Both uses are allowed within the flexible standard development standards; however the combination of the two uses into a multiuse project requires that a comprehensive ill application be filed. The project seeks a deviation from the building height standard of 35 ft to 80'-11/2" and a reduction in the parking required by the proposed retail use. The building height increase is within the flexible development range and is requested to facilitate the development of the allowed residential units, retail uses and enclosed parking. The east and north setback reductions are requested to facilitate the retail facilities to front immediately adjacent to the Mandalay Avenue public sidewalk and encourage tourist and resident pedestrian traffic as required by Beach by Design. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The purpose and intent of the Tourist District is to provide a safe and attractive tourist destination with a full complement of tourist accommodations and convenient access to goods and services. The proposed development includes 4,350 sf of retail sales and service space designed to be immediately adjacent to the public sidewalk to facilitate pedestrian access to goods and services. 3. 4. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The property surrounding the project site is currently under development as attached dwellings and multi-use projects including both attached dwellings and retail sales and services. The building setbacks immediately to the west are equivalent to the proposed west side setbacks associated with this project. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposed development is designed to be consistent in use with the adjoining properties offering a mixed use of retail sales and services and attached dwellings. 9 0 The height of the building is consistent with that of the adjoining properties and is positioned on the property to be consistent with the retail establishment on the east side of Mandalay Avenue by providing sidewalk front retail sales and services for the tourist district. The side building and pavement setbacks provided along the west property line equal or exceed the setbacks of the project currently under construction. The south side setback provided exceeds code requirements. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use The uses of attached dwellings and retail sales and services are allowed within the flexible standard development uses. b. The proposed proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; Based on the intent and purpose of the tourist district, the proposed project provides 4,350 sf of retail sales and services to augment the convenient access to goods and services by the tourist industry. In addition, the attached dwellings provide additional higher income residents to patronize the proposed project and surrounding retail and restaurant businesses. 6. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. The property surrounding the project site is currently under development as attached dwellings and multi-use projects including both attached dwellings and retail sales and services. The building setbacks immediately to the west are less than the proposed setbacks associated with this project. The proposed development and construction of this project will be self contained and not impede the on-going efforts of the surrounding properties. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEp • • • The parcel consists of 17,457.56 sf which exceeds the minimum 10,000 sf area requirement. • The width of the lot is a minimum of 100.00 ft meets the 100 ft minimum. • The height of the proposed building is 80'-11/2" which is within the flexible development criteria range. • The parking proposed is based on a parking study and will be submitted as part of this proposal. • The density of the retail and residential components are within the comprehensive plan limits. • See attached Beach By Design Guidelines C. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development support the established or emerging character of an area. The increase in height from 35 feet to 80'-11/2" allows for the construction of the 9 units and 4350 sf of retail sales/service to be constructed. The front of the retail fagade is located along the Mandalay sidewalk to promote tourist traffic. The residential unit facades are stepped back significantly from the first floor building allowing significant relief on all sides of the building. The site plan is also improved by the elimination of the driveways along Mandalay Avenue and reduction of total driveways to one proposed entrance on Baymont Street thereby promoting the flow of pedestrian traffic along Mandalay Avenue. The increase in height also improves the building fagade by allowing significant relief and balconies along all sides of the building while still providing market driven unit sizes similar to the current projects under construction. The proposed parking is partially screened by the first floor building walls from street view. The walls are shown on the colored renderings to be constructed from the same materials as the remainder of the building and painted Smokey Topaz to match other elements of the residential portion of the building. There are also several windows along the first floor that match the residential windows above. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes • Use of architectural details • Variety in materials, colors and textures • Distinctive fenestration patterns ORIGINAL • Building setbacks RECEIVED • Distinctive roof forms CEC 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 Attached to this application are color elevations which illustrate the design elements required. The front of the retail fagade is located along the Mandalay sidewalk to promote tourist traffic. The residential unit facades are stepped back significantly from the first floor building allowing significant relief on all sides of the building. The proposed parking is screened by the first floor building walls from street view. The walls are shown on the colored renderings to be constructed from the same materials as the remainder of the building and painted Smokey Topaz to match other elements of the residential portion of the building. There are also several windows along the first floor that match the residential windows above. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The project provides a minimum west side setback of 5.50 ft from pavement and a minimum south side setback of 17.60 ft from the building. Within the west setback a viburnum hedge is proposed to buffer the parking spaces from the adjacent property which has a setback of 5.00 ft from structure. The south setback includes a combination of palms and Crepe Myrtles surrounding a normally dry grassed stormwater pond. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 27 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ATTACHMENT D BEACH BY DESIGN GUIDELINES A. The gross density of residential development shall not exceed 30 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development includes 9 units on 0.40 acres, or a density of 22.5 units per acre. B. Maximum height is prescribed by the respective zoning districts in the Community Development Code unless otherwise restricted by Beach by Design. The height may be increased however to one hundred fifty feet. The proposed building height is 80'-11/2". This is a request listed on attachment B. There are no portions of the building at or above one hundred and fifty feet. C. Design Scale and Mass of Building 1. Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5, 000 sf or a single dimension of greater than one hundred feet will be constructed so that no more than 2 of the 3 building dimensions are equal in length. The approximate building length is 149.4 ft. along Mandalay Avenue and 84 ft. along Baymont Street. The Mandalay Avenue facade is broken up into three horizontal planes with dimensions of 59'-0", 15'-8" and 47'-0". Vertically, each floor is broken up with balconies and aluminum rails. Therefore no more than 2 of 3 building dimensions are equal in length and no horizontal plan extends more than 100 ft without interruption. 2. No plane of a building may continue uninterrupted for greater than one hundred linear feet (100 ). The building is divided by relief on the east and west sides of the building by relief greater than 5 ft. The maximum uninterrupted horizontal facade is approximately 60 feet in length and divided vertically by balconies and rails on each floor. The maximum uninterrupted horizontal facade on the west side of the building is approximately 92'-0". 3. At least 60% of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. Included within this package are reduced color renderings of the building elevations showing windows, sliding glass doors and aluminum railings and architectural rustification which exceed this requirement. ORIGINAL RECEIVED C.!---C 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 0 4. No more than sixty percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet will be occupied by a building. The maximum theoretical building envelope located above forty-five feet is calculated as 11,197.82 s.f. x 37.42 ft high = 419,022.42 cu-ft. The project design building envelope is calculated as (7,822 s.f. x 17 ft high) + (4,769 s.f. x 22 ft high) = 237,892.00 cu-ft or 57% of the maximum. 5. The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The building was design to correlate to the size of the parcel so as not to request any building setback reduction requested. In fact, the building setbacks substantially exceed those required by code along Baymont Street and the adjacent parcels to the west and south. D. The area between the building and edge of the pavement as existing and planned should be sufficiently wide to create a pedestrian friendly environment. The distances from structures to the edge of pavement should be 15 feet along arterials and 12 feet along local streets. A ten foot pedestrian path is key to establishing a pedestrian friendly place. The pavement and building setback along Mandalay Avenue (arterial) is maintained at 0 feet minimum to incorporate a public information platform and public seating areas, and the setback along Baymont is maintained at 13.0 feet minimum. The existing sidewalk recently constructed along Mandalay Avenue is being maintained, and the existing driveway eliminated. F. Parking Areas The parking areas are separated from the public rights of way by the building wall along Mandalay Avenue and by opaque landscape treatment including hedges, small trees and palms along Baymont Street. The landscaping proposed is consistent with surrounding public and private uses to minimize excessive leaf, flow or seed droppings on vehicles. The parking garage is screened from view by the fagade of the building, which is designed to blend into the residential portion of the building and not be readily apparent. L. Materials and Colors Per the submitted color chips, the building fagade maintains a Florida Mediterranean style with Monier Madeira clay barrel tile roofs along with a mixture of Restrained Gold, Ivoire and Arcade White building fagade colors. There are no bright colors or glass curtain walls associated with the project. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED UDC 27 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • December 27, 2006 RE: Gionis by the Sea 490 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, FL 33767 Direction East North South West Area of ouenina calculations Facade sf R uired Proposed 12,546 sf 7,527 sf 8,904 sf 4,985 sf 2,991 sf 4,243 sf 6,725 sf 4,035 sf 5,702 sf 11,938 sf 7,162 sf 7,853 sf Our calculations include but are not limited to: doors, windows, railings, banding, rustification, brackets, columns, and trim. ORIGINAL RECEIVE[ DEC 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • LL Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Clearwater Telephone: 727-5624567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded i nto sets • CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION W ITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ON E OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: M? 4 ?I i 4-k . MAILINGADDRESS:D _ YA"i_/ G(i?-_?,?j?((!? PHONE NUMBER: '1z1??- 8??7V` -_- CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S):T L N . ?` Y ?FW , ?) ?IGFr'ylDµ?j? 7 List ALL owners onthe deed f AGENT NAME:( ?{ S • ??? ?'? MAILINGADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER:- 7 _ FAX NUMBER: -77'-7?_? CELLNUMBER: E-MAILADDRESS: ?14iAg' YINCLG?- ` 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for thedevelopment. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape stan dards. RFCEIVE2.- ----------------_._ .?..??.._._.. DEC 14 2006 C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktop Page 1 n 2g6leslCorrprehensive Landscape Proog _r QO6 ARTMENT CITY IVIOFC7CLEARWATER 0 0 Z LIGHTING: Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. - -7 - AIrpcu4tAIF? 141- 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The l a ndsc apse treatment proposed in the Co}.m?-prr ehe nsi \e La ndsc ape Program will enhance the c om rru nit y c haracter of the City o f Clearwater. ? ?L?'I Az- 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate ucinniity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for de\el opment is located. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAYBE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS MRKSH EET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to \isit and photograph the property described in this application. 96 nature of p'ropertyoepresentati\e STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this _ day of A.D.20 to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as identificati on. Notar y p ublic, Mycommission e)pires: RECEIVED C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonV)esktoplnewplanningfileslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc DEC 14 2006 Page2 of 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM ATTACHMENT A 1. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The comprehensive landscape program for this project is specifically required due to the staff request and Beach by Design requirement to move the face of the building to the property line along Mandalay Avenue. This requirement does not allow the code required landscape buffer or foundation landscaping along the face of the retail shops. In place of the buffer, is a palm tree lined 12 foot wide pedestrian way fronting the faces of the adjoining retail shops. The remainder of the site has totally planted with trees, shrubs and groundcover without the use of grass. This enhanced plan will establish a lush low maintenance xeroscape planting program consistent with Beach by Design and the surrounding developments. 2. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. The lighting proposed will be mounted on the face of the building and automatically controlled. 3. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. The project layout promotes the continuance of a pedestrian friendly tourist district by the removal of an existing driveway along Mandalay Avenue and reconstruction of a retail center with storefronts immediately adjacent to the Mandalay Avenue palm lined pedestrian walkway. This design promotes the City vision of a pedestrian friendly storefront lined street with minimal disruptions from curb cuts. The Baymont Street frontage provides a landcape fagade and buffer including palm trees, shrubs and stormwater pond transitional plantings and eliminates the use of grass. 4. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The existing property is currently covered by an older retail center and outdoor parking. The groundcover is almost 100% impervious area without any significant landscape areas. The proposed development includes upscale condominiums, street front retail shops and a palm lined pedestrian boulevard ORIGINAL RECEIVED OR 14 2606 KANNING DEPARTMENT CITN OF 0-f-ARWATER 0 0 along Mandalay Avenue. The transition of this property from an older retail center to the proposed project will be consistent with the surrounding Sand Pearl development surrounding the property, and the Pelican Walk retail center across Mandalay Avenue. The value of the property will be increased by the enhanced use, upgraded architecture and improved landscape program. 5. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The site layout and landscape treatment is consistent with the Mandalay Avenue Corridor plan by placing the storefronts immediately adjacent to the pedestrian walkway. The remainder of the planting area on the site is covered by trees, shrubs and groundcover and eliminates the need for grass groundcover. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER w ?• DIROP Ar AL pRlv65 ~•I! 5• f, RWe4 Uwftllmbtlm Ter GleM R«wlr.4flMaaAM'A- 1-/YN ME- SWAGE A. MPedy N,«MT«aa DNaTa(a..l.o vAR-Tn..d wamm.Iaaa-3ved.mx) GRAPHIC SCALE Z r 0 0 1. PmmIaY FAR .............................._..................................LI _ 4 U .' i BYtd'mp give rmMyeMmnrnMrAnl9eawe. . ..a a SOd ? u ' ' `•< iEy r . rv 3. In aw nwimdanrWw+mmm?dmW memrb EWkW ... VfOd (In rm 1 LJ F rcn-m rt / BAY 4. Lama ....... ... .... .. ... ... I),45).36d Q • ? I r m 5. 9YAm1 NeWNrymM nPPai _ 1 wm a.w N<.a«<Arsrrwwa ' <' ..COMPACTED. m.mY?Y uemtlm MYlm6(A3) ...... S??Od Uv 'I I-•,•••? -? rr'" r' ...su6wADE .. a La me.(Naalaltle lm ®ebadlPYllq .-u,Rm.36d LEGEND CJ ? T- ..................................................................... Il.IO].J6t F E t. LM .. ... .. !493NOd / (l>q.) TYPICAL yj A 1 < " ...... 9. La «qe., ... .... .•O.100.va / ':y ?,.?..?..? FRO-T BOUNDARY ,E L • T '? 10. 1.4,Niplyl at .. 0,3001ma STRAIGHT CURB iin?m,?eHm erawloy av, F=mma. m 1 __1 RVwICD 1 Qgvii! TYPE A ExlsTwc TRr.ETO BE Tme c IR10Ex-1I1 - Q F PRIPOSTnca+rnDTEPA.EMwr BAYM ONT STREET_ rdl$Q. AT GENERAL NOTES: -/3?? - - -O,1 1. MCINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: K S AEIM 2AYAC 8 ASSOCAtEb INC. .r .... . 6- ANaE ITw ]AT ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, ANTE 404 .gym FETY HARBOR. R 34695 ??^ G 8 > ((]2]) )93-Sam a.. ?9Rd6° ..? (T2)) ]93-9855 Fex Z S /I: 490 ANVM.AY A 2 SITE ADORES < G 0 V Q 4 - _ • P CLEARWATER. R 33)8) 6> PM(FL 10: OB/29/15/I6]98/OW/05]0 6 L3 1 '.. ? , ¢MMOr iD ZONING: "i• G W LOT A i TF wnr. I 3. PRESENT USE I RESTAURANT k 2 COMMERCIAL BNLgNC Z 4. DEVELOPED USE 9 MULDFALOLY CONDOMNIUM UNITS h 4330 fm RETAIL STORE 3 ++ .ter ?-`w 'I r, f ?? • } S. TDTAI SITE AREA 1).45].58 SF (0.40 ACRE) 6 HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL LOT 55 tl? r? __ _ i •-~?• _ B. SETBACKS 15' FRONT 1300'ARM BLDG.) _ 0.00' NORM TO OUMPSIER STARING AREA) N ?4. I ' O ( A Er?• ', I - o.DD' (EAST ro Bu1LDNC) ;I LOT 1 F.F. = 4.50I( "R 10' 90E 5.50' =1 (NEST TOroADEwAUUf( PA6ENENn) ?( 800' (SwTH +Q00' MN. (SOUTH TO PAVE""T) d ]. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 3$'-10D' FT ew r-? _y1F a? Iw?,AC?_ At 11 '? r « « •'? d PROPOSED BLOC. HEIGHT 80'-1 1/2• FR GM FEMA LINE TO MID-POINT OF ROOF. Z ...«? -Tl4t I` w?Tl rm wrDi+` ' r / + ? I aiii 8. SOLD WASTE OUMPSTM RILL BE LOCATED IN IRAQ MNG a O f ¢3? B. Ud PING %NtN PROJECT BOUNDARIES VALL BE ATTACHED TO ? W _ mN>a k .JJ •' ?. I zF 6URDING AND D N1LL BE SUBMITTED AS PART MT OF FINAL wkgNG PLANS. ? ¢ E ?? I f 10. EXISTNG BUILDING FOOTRBNT AREAS • 8,255 9 . 0.14 ACRE. z D.' ?sw ITmI II tig I; 8.4 A W rAert'IthX I i I 11. ALL DISTURBED GRASS MA IN RIGNT-OF-WAY SHAH BE SODDED. L7 U 12. A, UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE RENOF£0 AND REPLACED VAIN CURS Y sIDEWAX. AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCN EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 LOT 5, ' III' 2^?,_-? ! RDrM,)1.NF. `y, l -A , N4 < ?•, k?A1p1 • ( X TMs STNVCTURE APPEARS TO Y N ROOD ZONE -AE- (EL 12). '\ r 'F) rtA'^NP ACCORDING TO THE ROOD INSURANCE RATE NM COMMUNITY PANEL ?- 6o°+mN. ]m l NU99M 125096 0102 G. NAP REVISED DATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. }.._?? I 1 PROMOED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. q q q HANDICAPPED 5'GN DETAIL _ LOT SO ?', 4 y M 14, THE PRO.ECi 4GNAGE RILL MEET 811E Ott OF CIEARWATER CODE yv A I r r.Jb erw ?..r (- Y (, 1 t?.M M)" 8 QO'fPXU 1 1 a mF l ib THERE ME NO UTILITY EASEMENTS N)ENTFlEO BY THE SURVEY / .8 OcY? 1 2{ 18. THERE ARE NO ENAAROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON ATE. b b b b LOT 49 x wMJ ,I [[ TIPICA Oro55 R110M? 1 1 17. A 5200 RECREATION FAMTY IMPACT FEE IS DUE FOR EACN NEW UNIT PRIOR TO O o o e B Q Q Q Q C PolM4ur LOT 65 v ?? I! ?y > ISSUANCE OF wNONG PERMITS OR FINAL PLAT IF APRJCMLE) YMICH EVER OCCURS FIRST. e ? CONTACT ART KADER AT )2).562.4824. PLAN M A fN --AY t8 M101 ?? / 16 DUMPSTER SERVILE SHALL BE ARRANGED WTH SOUD WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF M OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE Of OCCUPANCY. e? r 613 ?I? ? ?i0 ? ? PLEASE CONTACT lUM GLENN AT )2].562.4930 8 B ? a ?_ _ r C ( 19. THE VEADCAL GEAR HE]diT OF 1NE PA10 NG GARAGE IS A M1MMUM OF 8'-2" TO g ACCGM ATE VAN ACCESS PER ADA FLORIDA BUILDING CODE OR. 11 SECTION 11-4. &5 _ _ /? R 9ff LdI6: ^ ? :c,Mli A-A ... ...< B:c,wn B I Loma ?9ED$L' 9E41? ?}?• `III x m SITE AREA 1),45).56 3 (040 AC) 1),45].56 3 (0.10 AC) 10.00000 9 ? aT Gi"3'r wrr?? PROPERTY PROPDR]Y •"r "^'rL' 'S?"r'.TS "`...1?'rr:•""r /-PROPOSED LINE LINE 42• NARpNG PBII?gYDNO B. TOTAL OPEN SPAS 1.683 9 (0.0.1 AG) 823222 9 (0.12 9) BMW 9 (0.05 AC MI.) .? - ----M^ T.O.S. 4.? 4.00 O BURVAG FOOTPRINT 0.255 9 9.92234 SF 1].13).56 S.F. (1.0 FAR) P 90E I 90fwALN 5TO81AAYEN 0. SOEVkX/DEO(/PALED AREA, 9.S ILW 9 330.5 9 - °'"' "A"•?' i .sw r6tdMNA1ER P?1 E TOTAL AiF ms AREA, 1,)]4.56 9 (890 M) 1222534 9 (0.70158) 16. R 9 (095 M ua) BOTTOM` ' Sr"?Y r _ 1' / POND ?4.. EL.2.90 \ F. PM,ONG SPACES M SPACES 19 wA1I3 (ON-91E) b SAES SOLIDI El ZSO ?.T?1.jJ .?.= vT G. LEINO3UIR AREA 7.59,84 9 2708 9 -Too. LNOSCNPE AREA NIA N/A N/A NL .? L MOLD FMILI LINTS 0 9 UNITS 12 VATS (30 LINTS/ACRE) SFCTION (A-A) SECTION (R-R) d RETAI SA1E5 ! SEgMOS 6.255 ,F. (035 FAR) 4,380 V. (O20 FAR) 1],45).56 (1.0 FAR) 6HEETa N. T.S N.rS. ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 3 OF B ISSUE DATE'. 12.1406 • 0 1 It ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER BAYMONT STREET 0 _ e v? J v \• aV .s4 ?vS .' LOT 56 LoT se a LOT es, P.F. = 1.30 i1 r s Q 'f?7 ? ff LOT 5 y T 53 I4 Lb I,? ; A l ? k LOT 51 LOT 503µy' • M ? d`ww) mab(41RV1 . I it LOT 49 A uC 4 d , V - f wry.r 100 ti.. _? 1i iX0 LDr es fi 11 [B eMl y ?io'?aa III 4 Fy I 49A a , r Mo i A wV 14 So. ? /* r Ser3cw•Th] ?.R y?<cx?i? m° { ?e 11. un a{tt I 6 } nw+.nwn. (+.«, e.ev sta. w...nnw, wbmeuv seu $? .bn wn<.. «v...l '? ¢ d ? 3. Impolon ry.lo-n mM p in t eec.atl q LaMw iIM ? ? ? ?eiN? a muanetli..gotWM ?iatn ..nwr aiw 1rM. trop 3-130at ? ? awewwuw.. mw?G .axn lbe Mw m M1+d`?irevMbnv?ma ea.aanm?? n y Tn ene.<n,. anwaa ,m«v wawna. u. va<.nM ene w....wvx tar u. 4 g [ irrgovo- eonba limo- «U tM C.n«rol Oenbroctw. o av t, m. le.o.vq +.y.uw .vl.n oemovn.nl..a a avutl, r .v<n m.naww.n' : tl 7 7 H«Nm iwnUn 5.11 G.aivp, Pmmn-Cemp.n.aYM Orall.r Ln. - ne..sd s staan alava canwl rm.. xNma - n i R Q Q Q Q Q Q I awm< wn « ,nlro r w ? Io awne .an ev.. e ee na e P o€ €o o •e a s Q Q ? ? , I.? 'yy a y ®? y ?'[ ?' ME/ 4h OIIOE 1 6• 0. Q 1 6' ALN e o l: PALM H as a? _ J a" PALO g e' PALM 10 TOTAL VICES RF 5TO c.vsw vd.vl+v.IZCT. «T ?! ..r Xt ?aitl . Nw. v«` .M ) e?lwn^,-a?v.,xW,fav0ca _ T wrln O N ? ? M,R C) I T> t Pon A?o-?rOLL? Po-OC l m ? w ? m.:ti lro.n luw.m.i .pA d. v..3<•M.? Oc.l /? w '.! . m/a+N SNEEaa S OF 6` ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY ° ° I. naMi?v. cww<b. as ana. aMinv qa... ,.wine, w Pww. i.X.it«. uwrov. n.a avma. gnmam Z I 3. .wtl I,.?tl den. mewd... q oroe. w. mt antl q p. aaeea r .. Mw.«`'°.X.m ivc?re. «ean0?°"°""••ro•«<.. a awr rve.: vne sia a a. Ivr u.+.r cwnl.?. ? camn, ? m an.. ,_ F ' 3. w dw0'np .won b em. In ecrsewn Nn In. Po-lea 1.ur.o-Nn.n'. orM Gw.i. 4«cutiw. ocP?ontl o-w4sa. 1" ? :j <t ovdea..no. M MP..e «M yrllam 30-ID-5 xOM. a. A U. nnnurMum .ndebalw w rmlun<tlan .iU _ . GRAPHIC SCALE / a 3 w<nvwnuna .a .ne. a u.RVV>aemex vwvnwn « rae.? SOa wN em Sm vro=X? mvMa <.n.l<I.,a a G a ??--'1 cwL M-esmmw.e w ? ?m«e a.e lw d. aw iwW?e eMo-. me UrowWl ml.tl 'I' ?. ee..t°°."°I«I..' «eu'., lo-mww .vwen: x d a ..u.nw« e.o-+.. t 7 I .von w dnaas a.a. +r ?w..n = r vv.. a <av.« m,evi?, .aa x b a .a...e-u vn.. a, a 3, rm vxa M w wmew o- vn?*.e rs u. wmn?ew<. a u. Irona.<vv. eevv<b.. x un ...?t a v m.>.wnr ? Y , n.l.«n l van atl u. aanl mr. un aw «.a vn«x ? E t n clent.?ie ? «o. e«rcan. we .w<vw ro.alaaan.. ar mettla wt m«u.5 .vMSmrrom «,r n. r.me..e ` 3' F ? ' 0. 1MlM Mw? ?btn ?lw IM•«iX `altlm rpq?•m.wp h1y iwq an d4 me Uv W CewnwM psrwuwi<. I"- { t X yl'I ?aar.vontl bM lo-M.a.P .rtNlcl ?, 1 .I ?? 10, wcl^cmnal U. N w a NeMrq o- wry na o moE. e1W m.lrva wmpNm br IM.n b roan 2 f } ?I r,rL Tien. s > . u. v?v,t a lm le.a.<vw wan<br m u. r a ?asr?v. 1 _ ?/ .... v ra a.«a "" cMn°"'x°Ci' aw :t?O.on?iu.?? ? a m<..wrr .oo.wvl. v.mn. <ne k.n.. m v.rrem? ? w>e`M m. m m ? r ...o, Na 11, vivMi ire er m .mono a .t b ?.,v<""• wvm.. x .Iwo ex. m. l.ro.AV. Iv<nX.<l = c I3. (n m.e M w..nam mro.m.?q Un dtl M one/o- w.urnN'o-n .n«I Y eu«be b Im wtl.<ev. 4cnkM ?' om na-seea > o _ la, emr. . a m ae«lan., e« r •oPa«1 .r u. o.?. ¢ ? .me. a,w...« ?an.vaoa,®>s I.. «'°• vaerwt«. a tlN.a• aonl .alw.exnr rw a wove a Iwo (IA mvmm r,an m« r o Ix a :wtl in lvm..aal:a w u"". n>tln«. u. wnemve mnwae. veer b aw.<vv. met.na mte.aan. a.<nvw<I« .?e. a a 0 •`• IT, a nax?. m.vl ry vwcin<a m u. Iwwv<vvv pan n awl t vv«al« u Z F J q u. cry v..iM wamve..iu vwva w,.taawn <amep`.e wal I.er?'ewwe q vre«etl q u. imlv.ao <anu«ty. w... eur«« .v.«ravia avbe x u..vMrro w ? a le. nv wnvMV.wro?wnneemn «an..mn b v.+nvltl w u. o-.N<L ..cM rv. u. aqM Idwmeuw «va `r j Iv. crl.re,. we .mX a r«nane « m<...o.r q «<«n.aa. n.. vl.num.. ? 30. .rry .nl.Uq am. Ua an 6.tupe eur+N U. aneww. imlaemn .Mx m n.tlMe NT Sl. Mpu.ta. Tbrlbm•. 'f ?' a v.l w. rw bcl o-w« 31. 1m Latlwev. Cannecla «. m r.pen.IW !ar Un <.N.<tan. r«newl, aM waM 1x- al pry etl ou d- o v.n«atl aenv u. N.t.- a Ill. PMwL + - + + zt. Ax ene. dbnw uin eenl a .er .tea v..eeetl. w q Z «.w tz X IL W d 1. A w. cawr.v. to av emve..e t ¢ ..qn one Imlditl q 1. calm>. PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) ^I b ..Ta. 3. Tm m.va«e u«eaan snbm mun mM w ..c«e vii w cq we. z a z IS. DATE: 12141 PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. F?cl INSIDE OUT O GROUP )uwumrn •vNive 01)MBON,NDIIDI? NMI (tSi))L]6)l t MTN MYN? •IlO))IfCT GNf ?i WEST ELEVATION M? MA IadWIWI Nw. 1N•• i'« 0.`.41 N)'.1'C NORTH ELEVATION "DURON" SMOKEY "DURON" RESTRAINED GOLD SW 6129 "DURON" IVOIRE SW 6127 19 ARCADE WHITE # 7100 0 40 TOPAZ SW 6117 GROUND FLOOR PLAN .... ............... Nov] f]YW 176UID O f? ? VV f j I D>? 1 ?'?"? o I .-........ ?miouf i ?uDUfn Tawva o ucTx I,a, I r00MA nura. cRUla yr u? ? fufma fog I M 1ST FLOOR PLAN 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR PLANS MST UNIT (YPICAv LMNG CONDITIONED 1 M ^un1Tl FD - 743! SF 334 TOTAL AREA - 7159 SP EAST iNIT fTTP(CAL) LIVING CONDITIONED - FY l ?'^NDIT ? - 7511 SF 311 L]i a , TOTAL AREA - 775 o..i EAST UNIT !FIRST LEVEL ONLT1 LIVING CCNDITIONEO _ Lwroapl M N T _ 351'1 SF 7103 " y , p TOTAL AREA 4770 SF INSIDE OUT O GROUP D C. fI]LOV091 AVfiNUB DDMGD]f, FfDRGA fN91 (f]9)f N-0Of APGD9Q sA53 9 F ng? M r' Ile 1 0?3 F6A INSIDE OUT O GROUP o«G II3tAV0{XAVGN! DUMlOM.P{CAM 11!01 (MI)1?1Jln • ¦OBWK 0M1 AOCIfGBCT IDSS • 4TH FLOOR PLAN ...,.,M.vr 5TH AND 6TH FLOOR PLANS rnu: vtr.vr ROOF PLAN wu:lnr. w P m <N IN uvmn au.•11TM u °A'11 uo.r.la Z Q+7 10iL ON®A1110m R ' ' tYAY 9606E ,ma 1®CPYDDP ) OR mm M1t'NAYA D00.0 T ? mm ?. per): ti-+' 9090CV® DRLV - TOP OFpOpP MDOFNOF ------ - ------ mm ?' ? .' i .. l W9Y0Va190 61m9D A9Gp9 99Qanq ill; . ,. i - ? 6s-rNw.Yn ? + 19x109 vucX• I I ? p1 YAA® mm 'OOtD•f ? 1Sd'Nw vn 4 - ? I _ 9m1 1019 611111 , / II'.' 60 D TON m9601 "NAYD. /?0?0 - ?'?''( El '` ll 1ua?91 PIpOI ` 1O EAD1/ .DV1y 9bRT Mn . 1 . t '?} . I I . I,. lonii Mw I, : . O '6m9961rD1 b'M X.AVD. I . 11 "! J I ' ' : I `. e. 9 :I DURO ^ •atl.sre : su.lso SIG SICN SI SIG DaADe-+'s• _ MD6-e'6" nrTi m ril m7n m ana.-13 SOUTH ELEVATION .cu.va-1e - u m - mlo•66.1?,191am 1Y96nmtaa EAST ELEVATION .-..=. vsr-rr OIm60610?A 9uo0wY 96m.YU 191W[00? v6Pn wa131et 1YnNO"w . i 9? i '. l' I 3mamor f --- - ---------------- ?°°°? q ?? '9mr.6eDw •?eDm maor 1Dm go"' y .e I 'I :D a I 7tr 1.CA0. . .uueaew ' ? 9.91 -13 D> ®? t? ? 911D9 - - DDRD411D n9AW-1'e" NORTH ELEVATION 6?Y,, X,2.,r WEST ELEVATION zu6 vn ?< INSIDE OUT O GROUP. I3LWD6N AY60Va DVNBDm,FIORDA 3160! (Ytl)t 314613 909991 M 1P66rYR A9DIR6R 02966 F- -1 L_-A h =11 66n?11, 0 3(F7 0 • Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Zm CO W W ? Q N Q W ?-- J U 0 ? Z Q © y Z } gS) • • PARKING ANALYSIS FOR GIONIS, BY THE SEA 490 MANDALAY AVENUE CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA PREPARED FOR: MARY G. REALTY, INC. PREPARED BY: GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. NOVEMBER 2006 PROJECT # 06-072 W W ? Q Ca N Q Z? fit' 0? Oa w ZO a I. II. III. IV. V. 0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION METHODOLOGY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT CONCLUSION Robert C. Pergolizzi, AICP AICP # 9023 zm W W 0 C V . Q D C9 V <:?4 W J O V O? Ga z?- O t.s 1 LZI z z g? a 0 0 I. II. INTRODUCTION The 0.40 acre project site is located at 490 Mandalay Avenue and currently contains retail shops and restaurants. The site will be redeveloped as a mixed use project containing 4,350 square feet of retail space and 9 condominium units. The site is located on the southwest corner of Mandalay AvenueBaymont Street on Clearwater Beach (See Figure 1). The site is located in the Tourist (T) zoning district, and per Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code has a minimum parking requirement of 2 parking spaces per unit and 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail space. According to strict interpretation of the code, the proposed development would require a minimum of 40 parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows a total of 19 spaces being provided on-site, therefore an apparent 21 space deficiency will occur. The code provides for reducing the required number of parking spaces to recognize the special situations that exist on Clearwater Beach. Section 2-802 of the Community Development Code allows a reduction in parking if the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or adequate parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities within 1,000 feet of the property. City of Clearwater staff has recognized the retail establishments located on Clearwater Beach, in close proximity to municipal parking lots, on-street parking spaces, nearby hotels/motels and residential condominiums within walking distance, have a great potential for "walk-up" customers The Beach Trolley also stops near the site. Staff also recognizes the available public parking in nearby lots serves two functions, one to serve beachgoers, and two to provide parking for beach related businesses. This parking analysis was prepared to determine the availability of parking spaces. METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting this analysis a methodology was established with the City of Clearwater staff. It was agreed GCC would conduct a parking accumulation study on a Friday between 6 PM and 10 PM, and Saturday between 10 AM and 4 PM and 6 PM - 10 PM. The study area included on-street parking along Mandalay Avenue between the Hilton south driveway and Rockaway Street, on-street parking on Papaya Street, on street parking along Baymont Street, Municipal Lot # 34, and Municipal Lot # 35.These areas include a total of 147 parking spaces of which 4 are designated for handicapped parking. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENI CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 1 , 1 1 1 I w w C7 N H O O O N M m 3 U U LL 3 E a_ N O 0 v m J .n a o '^ ' W a2 Z ?W Y l7 W U W PROJECT LOCATION - GIONIS BY THE SEA PROJECT NO: 06-072 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. DATE: FIGURE: Land Development Consulting 1 1 2006 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. 1 • • III. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS ' Existing conditions were established by conducting parking lot counts between the hours of 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM on Friday November 3, 2006, and Saturday November 4, 2006 between 10:00 AM and 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM. ' Weather conditions were typical for early November with a high temperature of 79 degrees and lows of 58 degrees. No rain was encountered at any time during the study. The aforementioned parking areas were checked on the hour for the number of spaces that were occupied. The number of occupied spaces was noted and an hourly accumulated total was obtained for each specific parking area and the whole study area. The main parking facilities serving the southern part of the Mandalay Avenue business district are two municipal lots and on-street parking. Municipal lot # 34 ' contains 23 metered spaces plus 1 handicapped space and is located south of Papaya Street. Municipal lot # 35 contains 25 metered parking spaces plus 1 handicapped space and is located south of the CVS. Mandalay Avenue between ' the Hilton main entrance and Rockaway Street contains 46 metered on-street parallel parking spaces plus 1 handicapped space, Papaya Street contains 7 metered parking spaces, and Baymont Street contains 42 parking spaces plus 1 ' handicapped space. All parking areas studied are within a 1,000 foot radius of the site as prescribed by code. Friday November 3, 2006 ' On Friday evening parking demand did not vary significantly throughout the evening with a low of 66 occupied spaces (45%) at 6:00 PM to a peak demand of 97 occupied spaces (66%) at 7:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 50 unused spaces in the study area throughout the evening. Closer analysis shows Municipal Lot # 34 was underutilized throughout the evening. Table 1 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 2 provides a graph of hourly parking space ' occupancy. Saturday November 4, 2006 ' On Saturday parking demand varied significantly throughout the day from a low of 22 occupied spaces (15%) at 10:00 AM to a peak demand of 96 occupied spaces (65%) at 8:00 PM. As such, there were a minimum of 51 unused spaces throughout the day. Again Municipal Lot # 34 was underutilized throughout the day and evening.Table 2 provides an hourly tabulation and Figure 3 provides a graph of hourly parking space occupancy. ' ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' CITY OF CLEARWATER TABLE 1 FRIDAY NOVEMBER 3, 2006 TIME 6:00 Ph 7:00 Ph 8:00 Ph 9:00 Ph 10:00 Ph MUNICIPAL LOT #34 MUNICIPAL LOT # 35 MANDALAY AVE. PAPAYA ST. BAYMON T ST. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL %OCCUPIED 7 24 16 26 18 47 2 7 23 43 66 147 45% 10 24 19 26 32 47 1 7 35 43 97 147 66% 7 24 16 26 32 47 1 7 30 43 86 147 59% 8 24 22 26 28 47 3 7 7 43 68 147 46% 7 24 26 26 26 47 4 7 8 43 71 147 48% INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE IN MUNICIPAL LOT # 34 INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE IN MUNICIPAL LOT # 35 INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE ON MANDALAY AVENUE (HILTON MAIN ENTRANCE TO ROCKAWAY STREET) INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPED SPACE ON BAYMONT STREET z OZ G7 m0 %o m -v m z m Z a 09 ? ?m C" ?z • • FIGURE 2 - FRIDAY NOVEMBER 3, 2006 200 180 160 140 co v 120 a a co w 100 a v 80 O 60 40 20 0 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM ORIGINAL TIME OF DAY RECEIVED -W 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER -+- series1 • • TABLE 2 SATURDAY NOVEMBER 4, 2006 TIME 10:00 Ah 11:00 AN 12:00 Ph 1:00 Ph 2:00 Ph 3:00 Ph 4:00 Ph 6:00 Ph 7:00 Ph 8:00 Ph 9:00 Ph 10:00 Ph MUNICIPA L LOT #34 MUNICIPA L LOT # 35 MANDALAY AVE. PAPAYA ST. BAYMONT ST. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL OCC. TOT TOTAL OCC. TOTAL %OCCUPIED 9 24 26 10 47 2 7 43 22 147 15% 6 24 26 16 47 6 7 43 36 147 24% 3 24 26 16 47 7 7 43 44 147 30% 2 24 26 33 47 7 7 43 61 147 41% 11 24 V 26 41 47 7 7 E 43 90 147 61% 8 24 26 39 47 7 7 43 74 147 50% 8 24 26 32 47 7 7 43 66 147 45% 13 24 26 38 47 7 7 43 85 147 58% 15 24 22 26 28 47 3 7 2 43 4 9 147 64% 13 24 23 26 29 47 3 7 43 96 147 65% 14 24 0 26 35 47 2 7 43 87 147 59% 8 24 25 26 31 47 5 7 15 43 84 147 57% INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE IN MUNICIPAL LOT # 34 INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE IN MUNICIPAL LOT # 35 INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE ON MANDALAY AVENUE (HILTON MAIN ENTRANCE TO ROCKAWAY STREET) INCLUDES 1 HANDICAPPED SPACE ON BAYMONT STREET ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 • FIGURE 3 - SATURDAY NOVEMBER 4, 2006 200 180 - - - ---- - 160--- 140 -- - - - - 140- U) U' 120 --- Q IL U) w 100 --- 11110 a v 80 O 60 - - - - - -- --- - -- 40 -- - -- i 20 - ti 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM TIME OF DAY ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 2606 'LANNING DEPARTMENT nr (-I FARWATER I --*- Series1 • IV. V. FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH REDEVELOPMENT The proposed redevelopment as a mixed-use project would result in 19 on-site parking spaces. The redevelopment would require 40 parking spaces according to strict interpretation of the code, a deficiency of 21 spaces. Assuming the worst case, a minimum of 50 parking spaces are available to satisfy any demand therefore there is adequate parking available to support the proposed redevelopment. CONCLUSION This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with City of Clearwater staff. This analysis demonstrates of the 147 total parking spaces included in the study area, a maximum of 96 were occupied during any hour of the study period. As such, adequate parking is available within reasonable walking distance of the project to support the reduction in on-site parking spaces. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2096 PLANNING OF CLEARWA ERT L' GIONIS CONDOMINIUMS STORMWATER NARRATIVE • The attached stormwater report include calculations for the pre/post CN number, stormwater treatment and attenuation of the 25 year 1 hour storm event to pre-condition flows. The proposed stormwater ponds and concrete storage vault are a normally dry system providing treatment for 0.5" of runoff over the site, and attenuation of the 25 year 1 hour storm event prior to discharge into a control structure connected via underground pipe to the adjacent City system. The system includes two normally dry ponds and an underground concrete storage vault connected by equalizer pipes. ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1< pp s RAY JJ ! ??J ??SS. I '"1 11.1 • Gionis Condo Post development CN calculation Land Type Area CN grass 4187 concrete/asphalt 1954 building 10122 pond/wetland 1195 17458 Weighted CN 93.6 79 330773 98 191492 98 991956 100 119500 0 1633721 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 NO • DEPARTMENT pLg4NjNG CIN OF C EARWA ER • Gionis Condo Pre-development CN calculation Land Type Area CN grass 1683 79 132957 concrete/asphalt 9520 47.5 452200 building 6255 47.5 297112.5 pond/wetland 0 100 0 0 17458 882269.5 Weighted CN 50.5 E ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Gionis Condominiums Stormwater Calculations EXISTING CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C = pavement 9,520 0.49 building 6,255 0.49 pond 0 1.00 open area 1,683 0.20 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C = pavement 1,954 0.98 building 10,122 0.98 pond 1,195 1.00 open area 4,187 0.20 ATTENUATION VOLUME REQUIRED: Volume Required = delta C x A x I x 3600 delta C = 0.33 7CA 4,664.8 3,065.0 336.6 1,914.9 9,919.6 1,195.0 837.4 Area = 0.4 acres I = 4.2 in/hr 25 year 1 hour storm Volume Required = 2009.486 cubic feet WEIR CALCULATION: Q= 3WH3/2 H = 0.48 ft Q(pre)= 0.77 cfs W= 0.36 ft or 4.3 inches • C exist = 0.46 C prop = 0.79 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DEC 4 2M PIANNOF C EWWAlfp C11Y Stage-Storaae-Perimeter Project Name: Gionis Condo Project Number. Designer. kez Date: 10.23.06 REV. 12.13. 06 Comments: POND 1 & PON D 2 & Tank (0.5in)*(1 FT/12in)*(17,458 SF) = 727 CF ( ft) Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): 1,354.0 Area @ Design High Water(DHW): 1,306.0 Area @ Design Low Water(DLW) : 1,106.5 Area @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 990.0 STAGE AREA VOLUME Tank Volume Total (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 2.50 990.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 2.53 997.3 29.8 15.12 44.93 2.56 1,004.6 59.8 30.24 90.08 2.59 1,011.8 90.1 45.36 135.44 2.62 1,019.1 120.5 60.48 181.03 2.65 1,026.4 151.2 75.60 226.83 2.68 1,033.7 182.1 90.72 272.85 2.71 1,041.0 213.3 105.84 319.09 2.74 1,048.2 244.6 120.96 365.55 2.77 1,055.5 276.1 136.08 412.23 2.80 1,062.8 307.9 151.20 459.12 2.83 1,070.1 339.9 166.32 506.23 2.86 1,077.4 372.1 181.44 553.56 2.89 1,084.6 404.6 196.56 601.11 2.92 1,091.9 437.2 211.68 648.88 2.95 1,099.2 470.1 226.80 696.87 2.98 1,106.5 503.2 241.92 745.08 3.01 1,113.8 536.5 257.04 793.50 3.04 1,121.0 570.0 272.16 842.14 3.07 1,128.3 603.7 287.28 891.00 3.10 1,135.6 637.7 302.40 940.08 3.13 1,142.9 671.9 317.52 989.38 3.16 1,150.2 706.3 332.64 1,038.89 3.19 1,157.4 740.9 347.76 1,088.63 3.22 1,164.7 775.7 362.88 1,138.58 ORIGINAL RECEIVED DL-C 14 2006 STAGE (ft) 3.25 3.28 3.31 3.34 3.37 3.40 3.43 3.46 3.49 3.52 3.55 3.58 3.61 3.64 3.67 3.70 3.73 3.76 3.79 3.82 3.85 3.88 3.91 3.94 3.97 4.00 (ft) (ft) Elevation: 4.00 Volume: 1,758 Elevation: 3.86 Volume: 1,561 Elevation: 2.98 Volume: 503 Elevation: 2.50 Volume: 0 AREA (ft) 1,172.0 1,179.3 1,186.6 1,193.8 1,201.1 1,208.4 1,215.7 1,223.0 1,230.2 1,237.5 1,244.8 1,252.1 1,259.4 1,266.6 1,273.9 1,281.2 1,288.5 1,295.8 1,303.0 1,310.3 1,317.6 1,324.9 1,332.2 1,339.4 1,346.7 1,354.0 VOLUME (ft) 810.7 846.0 881.5 917.2 953.1 989.3 1,025.6 1,062.2 1,099.0 1,136.0 1,173.3 1,210.7 1,248.4 1,286.3 1,324A 1,362.7 1,401.3 1,440.0 1,479.0 1,518.2 1,557.6 1,597.3 1,637.1 1,677.2 1,717.5 1.758.0 Tank Volume (ft) 378.0 393.1 408.2 423.4 438.5 453.6 468.7 483.8 499.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 500.0 Total (ft) 1188.75 1239.14 1289.75 1340.57 1391.62 1442.88 1494.36 1546.06 1597.98 1636.04 1673.27 1710.72 1748.39 1786.28 1824.39 1862.72 1901.27 1940.03 1979.01 2018.21 2057.63 2097.27 2137.12 2177.20 2217.49 2258.00 TREATMENT VOLUME 745 W : ATTENUATION VOLUME: 2,258 W Tank 9'x56'xV Bottom Elev. 2.50' r PLANNING DEPARTMENT ^M/ nr- r1 Ga.pwATFR 05/17/2006 11:02 727821336110 GRINER ENGINEERING PAGE 03 GRINER ENGINEERING, INCe 1628 FIRsr AVENUE NORTH PHONE: (787) 822-2335 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33743 FAX: (727) 821 •$381 April 17, 2006 Mr. James Keller Public Works Administration Engineering Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 Clearwater, Florida 33756 Reference: Waterfront Condominiums 490 Mandalay Avenue Clearwater, Florida Griner Engineering Project No. 06058 Dear Mr. Keller: The following is our response to the Plan Review Comments that pertain to the Fire Protection System: FIRE PROTECTION Comment 1: Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 0511 S/06 - Condition not met, hydrant numbers do not match. Response: Shall comply. Hydrant number is # 1. Corrected. Comment 2: An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required Fire Pump to be located above ME Show proposed location PRIOR TO CDB_ 05115106 - Pump is insufficient. shows only 400 gpm. Response: Shall comply. Please see attached corrected Fire Flow and Hydrant Worksheet. ORIGINAL RECENED OCT 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPAR1Mrk r, CITY OF CLEAPA'i- bw CC 0 05/17/2006 11:02 7278213361 • Mr. James Keller May 17, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Please call, me i you have any questions. Sincerely. 4 V lj!r ro eph H. G R .E- President rj , •t , {? jhg/bh Attacbments GRINER ENGINEERING • PAGE 04 ORIGINAL RECEMD OCT 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 9 J 9 05/17/2006 1102 7278213361 GRINER ENG'LNEEP,ING pXrrl.i•; ?,+1t1.ITSi' 'r-Am. 02 -*,2i"za`2c9F xl?:t.t 7;'.i$6''?.61 Y FLOW TEST CjTY OF CLEAPAAM WATER DEPA.", ENT ?Lr -_• - ./ ' C ATk C5 P T's /r2(-J° ``?`- Ff? L:? ?Ni U'7 Y PSI s Vi"it 1 PAGE 07 Cp W LJ.1 ? F?- z N Q tx ?V O? - z? Z 5c td e69:0L 90 t 7L DaQ • 05/17/2086 11:02 7278213361 GRINER ENGINEERING PAGE 06 Y ?i q, .? ? 41C'v,' • IH ? 4MiLi`FYI,'::i???:A:'Sy',.'t•.;w?..... 1?ESIf3?I:PAIAtJ3 1 ERS'XX'' ?i"^ .!:n5?$t t':tY `^ . t?::J3: sii 2;i++lw ,: 1 Area #t System Type Area (sq. ft.) OensV (gpmM Inside Hose (9pM) Outside Hose (yp(n) 1. Wet 1500 (caic.) 0.15 0 2,90 2 Wet 850 01 _ 0 Atftch AddJllanat Sheets H Necessary 750 gpm (Auto-Wet- Total Needed Fire Flow (N.F.F.) Standpipe) is Existing System Supply Sufficlent to Meet N.F.F. Above? NIA . No Yes ?CApFS.?li!?3D:S?'?1itaIDARLIS' ?`r` •. ;L? ;?,. :.- .:.:r..-`? System Component Applicable NFPA Standard/ Year Edition and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes Sprinkler System NFPA -13 2002 Edition Manual Standpipe - Wet NFPEI - 14 2003 Edition Fire Pump NFPA- 20 2003 EdAlon Attach AddWanat Sheets YNecessary If Project Includes Fire Pump, Supply the Following. Fire Pump Information- Pump Capacity: 750 gpm Chum Pressure: 173 _psi _ ___psi hated Pressure: 120 psi • Pres-,ur+s Q 150% Plow: 112 On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?): 0 Prepararfvame: Joseph H. Griner, lil, P.E. Company Name: Griner Ert lr?0. Mailing Address: 1$28 First Avenue !North City: Saint Petersburg. State, FL Zip: 33713 Phone: 727.822.2335 Fax: 727.821.3361 Page 2013 • ca 0 0 N W r 20 DM W Ca ZW W W r Q ?Q W 117 J (DU z0 z g C) CL. 9,-d 569:01 90 t7 l, 090 • x5/17/2006 11:02 727£3213361 GRINER EW:)INFERING • FAGE 05 •: "'" r fJ' 1 `"*°r Pub 100 S. Clearwater Fire & Rescue 10 Fran"in Street -- GAaarwater, Florida 33755 i c Works Administration -• Enginsering Department Myrtle Avertue, Suite 200 -- Clearwater, Florida 33756 FIRE FLOW & HYDRANT WORKSHEET 71 ( ised 0 312 912 0 06) This worksheet is required to be submitted to an approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 Marie or more than 30 feat in height above the lowest Fire, Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that vnll req ire an Autornatic Wet Standpipe Systa:nn and/or Fire Pump before any permits for new building construction, building expansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply with Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 -- Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to include applicable NFPA Cod (NFPA 1, 13, 131), 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20. 291 and 1142 Annex 41 ) and AVMA M-17 - Installation, Field Testing and aintenance of Fire Hydrants. iPRC3JEGT IMFOR;IiATION Project Name: VVatsrfrort CondOrriif!iUrn project Address: 490 Mandalay Avenue - Cle -- arwater, Florida 33767 GENERAL WATER SYSTEM INFORMATI01i t.ec ation of Dearest Fire Hydrant: Mandal Ave. a Id Ba ont St. Hydrant* Size of Water Main Supplying Fire. Flow: 6° Looped System or Dead End Water Mein? Loomed static:. 57 psi Residual: 47 psi Pilot: 43 psi Flow: 1_110 gprn Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Riser: Horizontal 150 Ft. vertical Fleve!ion 2 +S I_} Ft. Hydrant Test Conducted by: City of Clearwater Keith Za ac (heludelAttaeh Copy of Aci•Uel Test sway hIFPA HAZARD-CLA$Sit=1CATION^ __.. -- - ._..:?...___ Area A Classif ration criptivn of Hezsrd Pmtsacted (C 1. Qrdina[y *diiy De="ion, Storage Height and ?rraflgerm"s . if appftoWe): are e 2. tight Hazard L ving Area I Adach Addrtlanal Sheet XNermsery• I i i Page 4 of a w u C= C- Z ? 4 N d e j (:/ W U P- Q U ? Z t C Z C-3 z g? 7-d eac:ni. an ti Dan S?AL? 10127/2006 Receipt #: 1200600000000011048 12:05:36PM q ?= Date: 10/27/2006 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-10057 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: S Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check MARY G REALTY INC R_D 1001 In Person Payment Total: 1,205.00 $1,205.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page l of 1 cReceipt.rpt FLD2006-10057 490 MANDALAY AVE GIONIS BY THE SEA PLANNER OF RECORD: WW ATLAS # 267A ZONING: T LAND USE: RFH RECEIVED: 10/27/2006 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLW CoverSheet 4 • • C I'rk' 01 CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT - ?rx" Pvsr Oi i jn, Box 4748, CLI?.ARWATER, Fwj [DA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SPRVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTU, Avi-NUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 I'I:r.r;rll<wE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RAGE PIAX :1\G DEVE-LOPM?VT R,7vil,w January 17, 2007 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc.. 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-10057 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 16, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side. (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 80.17 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a sight visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The subject 0.4 acres is located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street; 2. The current use of the. site is for a shopping center with retail sales and a restaurant; 3. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Destination Resort" District; 4. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a mixed-use building of nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area and represents the preferred form of redevelopment, in compliance with the vision in Beach by Design for this area and site specifically; 5. The retail floor area has been designed to provide for as many as four retail units facing Mandalay Avenue at a zero front setback in compliance with the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; FRANK i 111MARU, iNIAYOR (MN DA)RAN, C01 N(AL> EMBEN .I IM -1 I IANHIAON, Cc>i N([L.IP.N3i3h:R i3u.L;onticla, C0I;Nc11.MFNIi3FN C.\i"I.IiX A. PFIENSHN, C(A \QI_\IENWI:b: Ai:i:w i;vTlvi: Acrm L,A1N.U1. 'iT"! 0 0 January 17, 2007 Zayac - Page Two 6. The proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; 7. The proposed building height is 80.17 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The applicant proposes 19 parking spaces on-site, including one handicap space, to accommodate the nine residential units in the building at two parking spaces per unit; 9. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces; 10. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted providing the justification for the parking reduction; 11. The design of the residential portion of the proposed building is similar to that reviewed in September 2006; 12. The retail sales portion of the proposed building is compatible with other projects in the vicinity, including the Sandpearl project adjacently south; 13. The requested elimination of the foundation landscaping along the east (Mandalay Avenue) and north (Baymont Street) sides of the building, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria; and 14. That there is an active Code Enforcement case for this property regarding property maintenance issues, which has little bearing on the decision of this application. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all dumpsters be enclosed within trash rooms or screened trash areas, including those for the commercial units, acceptable to the Planning and Solid Waste Departments, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 5. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That, prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant revise the site plans to show removal and replacement of the existing parallel parking spaces and existing sidewalk and reconstruct the sidewalk at a 2% cross slope to bring the finished floor elevation of the building to 5.00; January 17, 2007 Zayac - Page Three 7. That, prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue; 8. That only elevator equipment or other mechanical rooms be permitted above the sixth floor; 9. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be monument-style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 10. That the applicant submit a survey when the sixth floor is constructed verifying this top living floor is less than 75 feet from the lowest fire vehicle access (street). Should this height be 75 feet or more, then a high rise fire package will be required; 11. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 13. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (January 16, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 30, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/jzov/dppts/plannin g. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S:0anning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslMandalay 490 Gionis (7) - ApprovedlMandalay 490 Development Order 1.17.07.doc • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 11:15 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gionis We are in agreement with staff recommendations. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 1/16/2007 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 2:32 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-10057 - 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced cases, scheduled to be heard by the Community Development Board (CDB) at 1:00 pm on Tuesday, January 16, 2007. Wayne M"El Mandalay 490 Staff Report.doc 0 0' Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 3:27 PM To: Maran, Robert (Bob) Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Bob, per our conversation, we will agree prior to building permit to remove and replace the existing parallel parking spaces and existing sidewalk and reconstruct at a 2% cross slope to bring the finished floor elevation of the building to 5.00. Based on this it is our understanding that this comment will be changed to a "prior to building permit" comment. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 12/27/2006 • • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:55 AM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - The following items need to be addressed immediately (by 9 am on Thursday morning [12/21/06]) to keep this case on course for the January 16, 2007, CDB meeting: Stormwater Engineering: 1. The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations 1' above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be 1 foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. 12/19/06 - NOT MET The stormwater issue is critical and must be addressed prior to CDB. Traffic Engineering: 1. Demonstrate that a scaled 17.5' long passenger car can exit the two south end parking spaces without hitting any objects. 12/19/06 - NOT MET I have other items that are not as critical, but still need to be addressed on revised civil and architectural drawings, and I will put these into a separate email. Wayne • • From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:58 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - Following are the items needed to be changed by no later than noon on Wednesday, December 27, 2006, on the civil and architectural plans and/or application material for this application, that are not as critical as the prior email sent to you this morning: Fire: 1. The height of this building is that of a HIGH RISE BUILDING, NFPA 101,Life Safety Code 2003 edition definition : 3.3.27.7 HIGH RISE BUILDING. A building greater than 23 m ( 75 feet ) in height where the building height is measured from the lowest level of fire department vehicle access to the floor of the highest occupiable story. MUST Meet the HIGH RISE Requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 12/15/2006 Send a letter agreeing to have a survey when top floor is in place to show that level from lowest FIRE VEHICLE ACCESS (street) to floor of highest occupiable level is less than 75' If over then the high rise package will be required. Landscaping: 1. 12/18/06 - WW A viburnam hedge was shown previously. Suggestion was to add more landscaping to it than just the hedge (not just mulch). 12/5/06 - WW Sheet 5 of 6 - With only 5.5 feet available for landscape treatment along the west side, suggest filling this area out with shrubs/groundcover rather than sod. 2. 12/18/06-WW, If the southern stormwater pond is to be sodded, state so on the plan. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet 5 of 6 - Will sod be planted in all areas not shown to receive trees, shrubs or groundcover? If so, state on plan. 3. 12/18/06 - WW Plant along the east property line a viburnam hedge to separate pedestrians along Mandalay Avenue from the southern retention pond. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet 5 of 6 - Sand cordgrass has been shown to cover the entire northern retention pond, including the bottom. This groundcover is drought tolerant, good for xeriscaping. Will it survive in wet conditions? Unclear why some type of similar landscaping is not proposed for at least a portion of the southern retention pond. 4. Relocate the viburnam hedge from adjacent to the Baymont Street right-of-way to be adjacent to the northern parking space, so that the viburnam hedge can screen the vehicle from view from the right-of-way. The hibiscus can be planted between the viburnam hedge and the right-of-way. Zoning: 1. 12/18/06 - WW Show the three columns black, like the other columns of the building. 12/4/06 - WW Civil plans - Need to show the covered entry at the southeast corner of the building. 2. 12/18/06 - WW a • • Recommend the electric meters and panels be shielded from view somehow, as it doesn't give the eastern unit a great view, plus it will be viewable from the second floor across the street. Recommend screening prior to the issuance of the building permit. 12/5/06 - WW Show or state location of electric meters. If within a room next to elevator, indicate on the floor plans the location. If exterior to the building, show location. 3. 12/18/06 - WW Responses state the FFEs have been added to Sheet A3, but I can only see the first floor. Please provide for the other floors. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet A3 - Provide finished floor elevation for first floor. It would also be extremely helpful to have the finished floor elevation for all floors and the flat roof deck for the a/c units. 4. 12/18/06 - WW Response states the elevations have been revised. This is partially true. However, it would seem on Sheet A3 this stucco band would also be consistently shown at the bottom of the rusticated stucco on the west elevation on the left hand (north) side, on the north elevation on the north side of the retail unit and on the south elevation on the south side of the retail unit. Revise. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet A3 - On the west elevation there is a stucco band at the bottom of the building on the south side. Is this band intended only at this location, or is it intended along all other elevations. Seems strange only at this one location. Revise elevations appropriately. 5. 12/18/06 - WW Provide the same Analysis of Opening Calculations as done for the prior FLD application. 12/5/06 - WW Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines (much like was done on the prior application), including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). 6. 12/18/06 - WW Response still needs to be revised. 12/5/06 - WW Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6c - First sentence of the second paragraph - Response states the parking "is screened by the first floor building walls from street view." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 7. 12/18/06 - WW Revisions acceptable, except as noted below. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet A3 - Based on the floor plans on Sheets Al and A2: a. North Elevation - On the west side of the eastern unit, the column should be solid (structural), not a double decorative column. b. West Elevation - On the left hand side (for the eastern unit), the balcony column should look like that on the East Elevation, not a double decorative column. 12/18/06 - Still need to revise. c. North Elevation - For both the eastern and western units, there is a middle column shown on the balcony that the floor plan doesn't show. d. South Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. e. West Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation for the balconies for the First, Second & Third Levels, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. 12/18/06 - Still needs to be revised - either the west elevation or the floor plans for the 1st, 2nd & 3rd floors. f. East Elevation - On the floor plans for all Levels, the design for the balconies for bedrooms 2 & 3 for the eastern units are shown similar to that for the balconies for the master bedroom for the western units. Based on the western elevation for these balconies, is it the intention to have the eastern balconies in these bedrooms look like the west side? West side elevation looks nicer. 12/18/06 - Still needs to be revised. Recommend using the double column look (see west elevation for the master bedroom) for the balconies in the eastern unit for bedrooms 2 & 3. Wayne S l e Keith Za :ac & Associates, Inc. 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com EB 9351 LC26000212 December 22, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: GIONIS CONDOMINIUMS The following is a response to comments received on December 19, 2006 via email: Fire: 1. The height of this building is that of a HIGH RISE BUILDING, NFPA 101,Life Safety Code 2003 edition definition : 3.3.27.7 HIGH RISE BUILDING. A building greater than 23 m ( 75 feet ) in height where the building height is measured from the lowest level of fire department vehicle access to the floor of the highest occupiable story. MUST Meet the HIGH RISE Requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 12/15/2006 Send a letter agreeing to have a survey when top floor is in place to show that level from lowest FIRE VEHICLE ACCESS (street) to floor of highest occupiable level is less than 75' If over then the high rise package will be required. Landscaaing• 1. 12/18/06 - WW A viburnam hedge was shown previously. Suggestion was to add more landscaping to it than just the hedge (not just mulch). Additional India Hawthorne plants have been added between the hedge and pavement. 2. 12/18/06 - WW If the southern stormwater pond is to be sodded, state so on the plan. ORIGINAL RECENED A note has been added to the landscape plan indicating sod. r_ 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3. 12/18/06 - WW Plant along the east property line a viburnam hedge to separate pedestrians along Mandalay Avenue from the southern retention pond. A viburnum hedge has been added along Mandalay Avenue. 4. Relocate the viburnam hedge from adjacent to the Baymont Street right-of-way to be adjacent to the northern parking space, so that the viburnam hedge can screen the vehicle from view from the right-of-way. The hibiscus can be planted between the viburnam hedge and the right-of-way. Hedge has been relocated. Zonin : 1. 12/18/06 - WW Show the three columns black, like the other columns of the building. Columns have been shaded black. 2. 12/18/06 - WW Recommend the electric meters and panels be shielded from view somehow, as it doesn't give the eastern unit a great view, plus it will be viewable from the second floor across the street. Recommend screening prior to the issuance of the building permit. A screen wall has been added to the plans and elevations. 3. 12/18/06 - WW Responses state the FFEs have been added to Sheet A3, but I can only see the first floor. Please provide for the other floors. Floor heights have been added to each level, including the roof. 4. 12/18/06 - WW Response states the elevations have been revised. This is partially true. However, it would seem on Sheet A3 this stucco band would also be consistently shown at the bottom of the rusticated stucco on the west elevation on the left hand (north) side, on the north elevation on the north side of the retail unit and on the south elevation on the south side of the retail unit. Revise. A band has been added around the retail walls 5. 12/18/06 - WW Provide the same Analysis of Opening Calculations as done for the prior FLD application. ORIGINAL Beach by Design response has been revised and added to package. RECEIVED ncr 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 6. 12/18/06 - WW Response still needs to be revised. Response revised as requested. 7. 12/18/06 - WW Revisions acceptable, except as noted below. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet A3 - Based on the floor plans on Sheets A 1 and A2: a. North Elevation - On the west side of the eastern unit, the column should be solid (structural), not a double decorative column. b. West Elevation - On the left hand side (for the eastern unit), the balcony column should look like that on the East Elevation, not a double decorative column. 12/18/06 - Still need to revise. c. North Elevation - For both the eastern and western units, there is a middle column shown on the balcony that the floor plan doesn't show. d. South Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. e. West Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation for the balconies for the First, Second & Third Levels, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. 12/18/06 - Still needs to be revised - either the west elevation or the floor plans for the 1 st, 2nd & 3rd floors. f. East Elevation - On the floor plans for all Levels, the design for the balconies for bedrooms 2 & 3 for the eastern units are shown similar to that for the balconies for the master bedroom for the western units. Based on the western elevation for these balconies, is it the intention to have the eastern balconies in these bedrooms look like the west side? West side elevation looks nicer. 12/18/06 - Still needs to be revised. Recommend using the double column look (see west elevation for the master bedroom) for the balconies in the eastern unit for bedrooms 2 & 3. Columns have been revised on plans and elevations. Sincerely: ORIGINAL RECEIVED Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA President L "%j 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER , ? ? ? LL " ',? j ? / , • '? C I T Y OF C L E A R W A TE R ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT + ?? `qT ER+0%PosT OrFicl: Box 4748, CLFARWATER, FI.ORIDA 33758-4748 F MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, LOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 Tiiu:PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMIiNT REVIEW December 22, 2006 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2006-10057) Dear Mr. Zayac: Case No. FLD2006-10057 for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 80.17 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a sight visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, for property located at 490 Mandalay Avenue, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on January 16, 2007. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3'a floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, M . ?/dm Wayr e M. Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending casesl Up for the next CDBIMandalay 490 Gionis (7) - 1.16.07 CDB - WWIMandalay 490 CDB Letter.doc PRANK I IIRR;V2D, MA) OR J<?uN f olmN, C?>i?N?:IL,w:,?nsrR (I<?rr i IANIII: m. Co1-NCn.NwN11 1" 13u.i. JON')O,N, C.OGNCILv11;N1lih;R CAPITN A. Prriuriit?. CIH N<:n.?n'.>n;r•.R "EQUAL FINIPLOYNIFNT AND AI'I'ntNIA'Hvi: Ac'no N I;\1PLOWW' 4 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:58 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - Following are the items needed to be changed by no later than noon on Wednesday, December 27, 2006, on the civil and architectural plans and/or application material for this application, that are not as critical as the prior email sent to you this morning: Fire: 1. The height of this building is that of a HIGH RISE BUILDING, NFPA 101,Life Safety Code 2003 edition definition 3.3.27.7 HIGH RISE BUILDING. A building greater than 23 m ( 75 feet ) in height where the building height is measured from the lowest level of fire department vehicle access to the floor of the highest occupiable story. MUST Meet the HIGH RISE Requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 12/15/2006 Send a letter agreeing to have a survey when top floor is in place to show that level from lowest FIRE VEHICLE ACCESS (street) to floor of highest occupiable level is less than 75' If over then the high rise package will be required. Landscaping: 1. 12/18/06 - WW A viburnam hedge was shown previously. Suggestion was to add more landscaping to it than just the hedge (not just mulch). 12/5/06 - WW Sheet 5 of 6 - With only 5.5 feet available for landscape treatment along the west side, suggest filling this area out with shrubs/groundcover rather than sod. 2. 12/18/06 - WW If the southern stormwater pond is to be sodded, state so on the plan. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet 5 of 6 - Will sod be planted in all areas not shown to receive trees, shrubs or groundcover? If so, state on plan. 3. 12/18/06 - WW Plant along the east property line a viburnam hedge to separate pedestrians along Mandalay Avenue from the southern retention pond. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet 5 of 6 - Sand cordgrass has been shown to cover the entire northern retention pond, including the bottom. This groundcover is drought tolerant, good for xeriscaping. Will it survive in wet conditions? Unclear why some type of similar landscaping is not proposed for at least a portion of the southern retention pond. 4. Relocate the viburnam hedge from adjacent to the Baymont Street right-of-way to be adjacent to the northern parking space, so that the viburnam hedge can screen the vehicle from view from the right-of-way. The hibiscus can be planted between the viburnam hedge and the right-of-way. Zoning: 1. 12/18/06 - WW Show the three columns black, like the other columns of the building. 12/4/06 - WW Civil plans - Need to show the covered entry at the southeast corner of the building. 2. 12/18/06 - WW Recommend the electric meters and panels be shielded from view somehow, as it doesn't give the eastern unit a great view, plus it will be viewable from the second floor across the street. Recommend screening prior to the issuance of the building permit. 12/5/06 - WW Show or state location of electric meters. If within a room next to elevator, indicate on the floor plans the location. If exterior to the building, show location. 3. 12/18/06 - WW Responses state the FFEs have been added to Sheet A3, but I can only see the first floor. Please provide for the other floors. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet A3 - Provide finished floor elevation for first floor. It would also be extremely helpful to have the finished floor elevation for all floors and the flat roof deck for the a/c units. 4. 12/18/06 - WW Response states the elevations have been revised. This is partially true. However, it would seem on Sheet A3 this stucco band would also be consistently shown at the bottom of the rusticated stucco on the west elevation on the left hand (north) side, on the north elevation on the north side of the retail unit and on the south elevation on the south side of the retail unit. Revise. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet A3 - On the west elevation there is a stucco band at the bottom of the building on the south side. Is this band intended only at this location, or is it intended along all other elevations. Seems strange only at this one location. Revise elevations appropriately. 5. 12/18/06 - WW Provide the same Analysis of Opening Calculations as done for the prior FLD application. 12/5/06 - WW Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines (much like was done on the prior application), including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). 6. 12/18/06 - WW Response still needs to be revised. 12/5/06 - WW Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6c - First sentence of the second paragraph - Response states the parking is screened by the first floor building walls from street view. Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 7. 12/18/06 - WW Revisions acceptable, except as noted below. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet A3 - Based on the floor plans on Sheets Al and A2: a. North Elevation - On the west side of the eastern unit, the column should be solid (structural), not a double decorative column. b. West Elevation - On the left hand side (for the eastern unit), the balcony column should look like that on the East Elevation, not a double decorative column. 12/18/06 - Still need to revise. c. North Elevation - For both the eastern and western units, there is a middle column shown on the balcony that the floor plan doesn't show. d. South Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. e. West Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation for the balconies for the First, Second & Third Levels, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. 12/18/06 - Still needs to be revised - either the west elevation or the floor plans for the 1st, 2nd & 3rd floors. f. East Elevation - On the floor plans for all Levels, the design for the balconies for bedrooms 2 & 3 for the eastern units are shown similar to that for the balconies for the master bedroom for the western units. Based on the western elevation for these balconies, is it the intention to have the eastern balconies in these bedrooms look like the west side? West side elevation looks nicer. 12/18/06 - Still needs to be revised. Recommend using the double column look (see west elevation for the master bedroom) for the balconies in the eastern unit for bedrooms 2 & 3. Wayne 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:55 AM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: Doherty, Steve; Rice, Scott; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - The following items need to be addressed immediately (by 9 am on Thursday morning [12/21/06]) to keep this case on course for the January 16, 2007, CDB meeting: Stormwater Engineering: 1. The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations 1' above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be 1 foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. 12/19/06 - NOT MET The stormwater issue is critical and must be addressed prior to CDB. Traffic Engineering: 1. Demonstrate that a scaled 17.5' long passenger car can exit the two south end parking spaces without hitting any objects. 12/19/06 - NOT MET I have other items that are not as critical, but still need to be addressed on revised civil and architectural drawings, and I will put these into a separate email. Wayne • 0 Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keithAke ithzayac. corn EB 9351 LC26000212 December 15, 2006 Wayne Wells City Of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-10057-490 MANDALAY AVE. General Engineering Prior to review by CDB: 1. Complete notes 13 and 14, page 416. Notes have been revised Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Acknowledged 2. Applicant shall pay applicable sewer and water impact fees. Acknowledged 3. Provide a note or indicate on the plan that fire hydrant assembly will be located no further than 40 feet from a Fire Department Connection (FDC). Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: A hydrant has been added to plan 1. Applicant shall grant to the City of Clearwater an easement over all unrestricted water lines to be located on private property. Acknowledged 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. Acknowledged 0 0 3. The City of Clearwater will install parking meters adjacent to all public parking spaces on Mandalay Avenue. Applicant will coordinate construction efforts with the City's Parking Facilites Manager to have all existing parking meters relocated as necessary and to provide meters for new public parking spaces . General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfysite-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged Environmental: 1. No Issues Fire: 1. Utility Plan page 4 # 13 and # 14 are incomplete. Shall ? and Must ? Please finish the verbage to these statements. PRIOR TO CDB Notes have been revised 2. Utility Plan shows the Fire Hydrant to be used for the Fire Department Connection on page 4 of 6 Show the location of second Fire Hydrant for fire fighting within 300 feet of building. PRIOR TO CDB A second hydrant has been added 3. The height of this building is that of a HIGH RISE BUILDING, NFPA I01,Life Safety Code 2003 edition definition : 3.3.27.7 HIGHRISE BUILDING. A building greater than 23 m ( 75 feet) in height where the building height is measured from the lowest level of fire department vehicle access to the floor of the highest occupiable story. MUST Meet the HIGH RISE Requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. The defined height is 741-0" and is not defined as a high rise. See sheet A3 for dimension 4. Must meet Ordinance NO. 7617-06--Radio System Regulations for Buildings.Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Acknowledged Harbor Master: 1. No issues. Legal: 1. No Issues. Land Resources: 0 0 Landscaping: 1. Sheet 5 of 6 - With only S. S feet available for landscape treatment along the west side, suggest filling this area out with shrubs/groundcover rather than sod. A landscape hedge has been added to the west property line with pine nugget mulch 2. Sheet S of 6 - Will sod be planted in all areas not shown to receive trees, shrubs or groundcover? If so, state on plan. There is no proposed sod. All areas are planted with shrubs, trees and groundcover with the exception of the southern stormwater pond as noted in the cross sections. 3. Sheet 5 of 6 - Crape myrtles need to be two-inch caliper. Revised 4. Sheet 5 of 6 - Sand cordgrass has been shown to cover the entire northern retention pond, including the bottom. This groundcover is drought tolerant, good for xeriscaping. Will it survive in wet conditions? These species have been successfully used in normally dry and normally wet stormwater ponds in other projects including Channelside Subdivision in Safety Harbor. 5. Unclear why some type of similar landscaping is not proposed for at least a portion of the southern retention pond. The southern retention pond is sodded since is is surrounded by retaining walls and not visible from the right of way 6 Due to the request to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program, providing alternative landscape measures to meet the requirements of the Code or reasons why the elimination is necessary. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted Parks and Recreation: 1. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (f applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4724 to calculate the assessment. See note #17 on sheet 3 Stormwater: Prior to CDB the following conditions are to be met: 1) The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations P above above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be I foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. The 100 year storm event within this area of the beach is at elevation 12.0 and will flood the entire barrier island no matter what the finished floor elevation is. The proposed finished floor elevation is proposed to match the existing building finished floor elevation which has 0 0 not experienced flooding even without a stormwater management system. If the finished flood is raised 1.5 ft there would be a need for extensive ramps along the front of the building which would do away with the Beach by Design required storefronts on the property line and expanded width pedestrian walk. 2) The site plan is to show the proposed improvements on Baymont St. that are proposed to be done by the developer of the Sand Pearl Resort. It is recommended that the owfall pipe for this site tie into the proposed inlet on Baymont as this system will have more capacity, rather than connected to inlet on Mandalay Ave. The proposed stormwater improvements have been graphically delineated on sheet 4, and the outfall structure relocated to outfall into the adjacent proposed structure along Baymont Street. Solid Waste: No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1. Acknowledge that the vertical clear height of the parking garage is 82 "to accommodate van accessible parking per ADA Florida Building Code Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.5. on both civil and architectural site plans. Note 19 has been added to sheet 3 2. Demonstrate that a scaled 17.5' long passenger car can exit the two south end parking spaces without hitting any objects. An autoturn template has been added to sheet 3 3. Walls and/or columns shall not obstruct parked motorist's visibility. This note has been stricken at the DRC 4. Provide a 6'space between the off-site parallel parking spaces for better manueverability and pedestrian access. Six foot spaces have been added between the restripped parallel parking spaces. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C. 0.). Acknowledged 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Acknowledged • Planning: • 1. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; Acknowledged 2. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Acknowledged 3. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; Acknowledged 4. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Acknowledged 5. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, Acknowledged 6 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; Acknowledged 7. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide%btain the following. a a copy of the approved SWFWAM permit or letter of exemption; Acknowledged b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond, and Acknowledged c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. Acknowledged 8. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; Acknowledged 9. Sheet 3 - Revise the proposed height to 82'--5". The proposed height has been revised to 801-11/2" based on the revised architectural plans 10. The dumpster room is the same size as it was under the prior proposal denied by the CDB, yet three residential units have been eliminated and 4,350 square feet of retail space has been added. Is this room big enough for the retail uses? The residential units have a trash chute to dispose of their trash from their level. Operationally, how will the retail units dispose of their trash? There are areas at the rear of the retail available to use as dedicated trash areas dependent on the types of tenants and their needs. 11. If a commercial unit needs to install a grease trap, where will such be installed, since the sanitary sewer line exits the building on the north side through the retention pond? A potential grease trap location has been added to sheet 4 12. Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Remove the curb on the east side of the trash staging area in order to get dumpster(s) into the trash staging area. Deleted 13. Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Place a radius (not a 90-degree angle) at the corner of the northern parking space and the drive aisle for better maneuvering ability for a vehicle to access this northernmost space. Radius added 14 Southwestern stairwell - Building/Fire Codes will require a sidewalk from the exit door to a public way within the right-of-way. Show how this is being accomplished on all civil and landscape plans (minimum 44-inches wide). A sidewalk has been added along the south of the building 15. Architectural plans indicate that a/c units will be on top of the residential tower. Will this include the retail units, or will their a/c units be on their roof? All of the A/C units will be on the roof above the residential units, see sheet A2 16 Sheet A-1- Will the eastern unit on the first floor have full use of the roof of the retail units as a terrace or will it be restricted to only certain areas? If restricted, indicate such on the plans. The first floor unit will have a private access to the balcony above the retail. 17. Colors on SheetA-3 are inconsistent with the reduced 8.5"x11 "colored elevations. Ensure written colors on Sheet A-3 have arrows to the appropriate areas, are the correct color and are sufficient to indicate the color scheme of the building. The elevation colors are noted on sheet A3 18. Civil plans - Need to show the covered entry at the southeast corner of the building. Covered entry added to site plan 20. Show or state location of electric meters. If within a room next to elevator, indicate on the floor plans the location. If exterior to the building, show location. The electrical meters are to he on the outside wall of the electrical room, see sheet Al 0 0 21. Sheet A2 - Roof plan appears to indicate there is a storage room on the roof above the sixth floor. Correct? If so, definition of "height, structure or building" does not permit such. Advise/revise. The room on the roof is a mechanical room, see sheet A2 22. Need to include on Sheet 3 of 6 the mixed use calculation (being provided to you via email). Added as requested 23. Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise Total Required Parking to 40 spaces (not 31). Revised 24. Sheet 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Some columns are shown as white, some are black. Be consistent (prefer black). All columns have been darkened 25. Sheet A3 - Provide finished floor elevation for first floor. It would also be extremely helpful to have the finished floor elevation for all floors and the flat roof deck for the a/c units. The floor elevations have been added to the elevations, see sheet A3 26 Sheet A3 - On the west elevation there is a stucco band at the bottom of the building on the south side. Is this band intended only at this location, or is it intended along all other elevations. Seems strange only at this one location. Revise elevations appropriately. The elevations have been revised on sheet A3 27. Ground-level retail will be required to be floodproofed. With this design, ensure final design will incorporated floodproofing measures. If such design needs to change to accommodate floodproofing, show such change now. Has been Acknowledged 28. Duron Smokey Topaz may be a little too dark Revise to a lighter shade. The design used the same color choices previously approved. The darker colors will lighten when exposed to sunlight and are needed to give the design a base 29. Attachment D to the application indicates in "e" (last paragraph) that parking is screened from street view. This is true on the east side, but what is happening on the north side? The plans (norwritten material) do not indicate how this is being addressed. Revise plans and written material. Revised 30. Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines (much like was done on the prior application), including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). Analysis added 31. Stem walls are proposed for the vertical portions of the retention ponds (north and south). Whatis being constructed on top of the stem wall for safety (wall, railing, etc.)? Is there any design of this decided yet? If so, provide/show. Additionally, there is no cross section of either pond. What is the slope of the ponds and will there be any fencing of these ponds required? If so, show. A railing has been added to the top of the walls 0 • 32. Sheet 3 of 6 - Unclear of note on west side "concrete flum" (?). Advise/revise. Note deleted 33. Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise arrow for "straight curb" note on the west side to the appropriate location. Revised 34. Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise arrow for "(2) 20500'sight visibility triangle (typ)"to the appropriate location. Revised 35. Per Building Code, the floor plan for the 5th & 61h level is correct showing two stairwells. Revise the West, North and South Elevations on Sheet A3 to show the second stairwell in the southwest corner of the building with the access walkway to the stairwell (shown correctly on prior proposal). The stairway has been revised on sheet A3 36 Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #1- Response says that the parking "is within an enclosed parking garage which is designed to be perceived as an extension of the residential units above. "Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street.Revise response. Revised 36 Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #4 - Response needs to reference the parking demand study for the reduction of required parking. Revised 37. Attachment D - Criteria #]a - Response says in the first sentence the increase to height is from 30 feet. In the Tourist District, this height is 35 feet. Revise. Revised 38. Attachment D - Criteria #l b - Response states the parking is "enclosed and located behind the retail shops. " Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. Revised 39. Attachment D - Criteria #I e - Response states the parking "is screened by the first floor building walls from street view. "Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. Revised 40. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1- a. Revise response in third sentence from "25 "feet to "35 "feet. b. You need to state that you are requesting setback reductions (to the front [east and north] and to the side [west]). Need to reference that Beach by Design desires/mandates the building at a zero front setback to Mandalay Avenue. • Added • 41. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - It is noted that the project will not be "self contained" as the total required off-street parking is not being provided on-site. Revised 42. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Unclear as to meaning of the next to last sentence. You say this project "exceeds" the setbacks of the Sandpearl project on the east. They were approved at a zero setback on the east, just as you are requesting. Revised 43 Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria 46b - This is referring to the Beach by Design Guidelines. Provide appropriate response. Beach by Design responses added 44. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 36 Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6c - First sentence of the second paragraph - Response states the parking "is screened by the firstfloor building walls from street view. "Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. Revised 45. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6d - Expand on the response, especially in terms of changes in horizontal building planes, use of architectural details, variety in materials, colors and textures, distinctive fenestration patterns and distinctive roof forms. a. See revised Attachment E 46 Sheet 3 of 6 - Confirm that the proposed vehicular area listed is for that part of the pavement not under the building (meaning, you don't need to count that pavement under the building as vehicular use area, since you cannot plant landscaping under the building). The number has been revised based on the current design 47. Sheet A3 - Provide a dimension on the north elevation as to the vertical height of the building over the drive aisle. The dimension has been added to A3 48. Sheet A3 - It appears appropriate design to replicate the rusticated stucco areas shown on the south side of the stair towers also on the west stair tower. The revisions are shown on sheet A3 49. Sheet A3 - a. Unclear why rusticated stucco is proposed on only the western dwelling unit facade on the first level, rather than just stippled stucco. a. See revised sheet A3 b. Unclear why stippled stucco is not shown in all locations on all elevations, except where rusticated stucco is indicated. • Revised on sheet A3 • c. West Elevation - Show the lines of the eastern stairtower on Levels 4 and S (just like Level 6). Revised on sheet A3 d. North and West Elevations - Unclear why the rusticated stucco is not continued on the ground level onto the north and west elevations. a. See revised sheet A3 e. South Elevation - Rusticated stucco location and height on the stairtowers should be consistent (seeing as the western stairtower needs to extend up to the sixth level). a. See revised sheet A3 51. SheetAl - a. First, Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the dining room projects from the main face of the building on the west side. Revised on sheet Al b. Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the balconies in the bedrooms projects from the wall and the kitchen projects from the main face of the building on the east side. Revised on sheet Al c. First, Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the building indents from the eastern edge of the elevator to the open walkway area and the distance from the eastern wall of bedroom #3 to the open walkway area. Revised on sheet Al d. First Level - It appears an extra column has been added to the balcony for the eastern unit. See revised sheet Al 52. Sheet A2 - a. Fourth Level - Provide the dimension for the distance the gazebo by the pool projects from the main face of the building on the west side. Added to sheet A2 b. Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the balconies in the bedrooms projects from the wall and the kitchen projects from the main face of the building on the east side. Added to sheet A2 c. Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the building indents from the eastern edge of the elevator to the open walkway area and the distance from the eastern wall of bedroom #3 to the open walkway area. Added to sheet A2 d. Fifth & Sixth Levels - It appears that columns north of Stairwell #2 need to be shown on the western side. Revised on sheet A2 53. Sheet A3 - Based on the f loor plans on Sheets Al and A2: a. North Elevation - On the west side of the eastern unit, the column should be solid (structural), not a double decorative column. Revised on sheet A3 b. West Elevation - On the left hand side (for the eastern unit), the balcony column should look like that on the East Elevation, not a double decorative column. Revised on sheet A3 c. North Elevation - For both the eastern and western units, there is a middle column shown on the balcony that the floor plan doesn't show. Revised on sheet A3 d. South Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation, but the floor plans show a solid column. Ifyou want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. See revised sheet A3 e. West Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation for the balconies for the First, Second & Third Levels, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. See revised sheet A3 f. East Elevation - On the floor plans for all Levels, the design for the balconies for bedrooms 2 & 3 for the eastern units are shown similar to thatfor the balconies for the master bedroom for the western units. Based on the western elevation for these balconies, is it the intention to have the eastern balconies in these bedrooms look like the west side? West side elevation looks nicer. See revised sheet A3 54. Sheet A2 - Pool must be handicap accessible. Will you be installing a lift? The lift is shown on sheet A2 INSIDE OUT GROP, INC. O Architects •.... INSIDE OUT CONSTRUCTION, INC. ¦NS?OE Contractors CG C1510383 ®VT 1:15 pm Case Number: FLD2006-10057 - 490 MANDALAY AVE Owner(s): Mary G Realty Inc 490 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, F134695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith a kcithra?ac,com Location: 0.40 acres located at the southwest comer of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamuiph0 aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Tom Glenn Applicant: Keith Zayac, Jerry Figurski, Clem Papas The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: ORIGINAL General Engineering: RECEIVED DEC 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 812 Louden Avenue, Dunedin, FL 34&velopment Review Agend401Ttgp*V ember 7, 2006 - Page 32 fax: 727-733-5249 Prior to review by CDB: • 0 1. Complete notes 13 and 14, page 4/6. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). See the Civil Drawings. 2. Applicant shall pay applicable sewer and water impact fees. The Owner is to Provide: 3. Provide a note or indicate on the plan that fire hydrant assembly will be located no further than 40-feet from a Fire Department Connection (FDC). See the Civil Drawings. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: Applicant shall grant to the City of Clearwater an easement over all unrestricted water lines to be located on private property. The Owner is to Provide 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. The Owner is to Provide The City of Clearwater will install parking meters adjacent to all public parking spaces on Mandalay Avenue. Applicant will coordinate construction efforts with the City's Parking Facilites Manager to have all existing parking meters relocated as necessary and to provide meters for new public parking spaces. Has been Acknowledged General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Has been Acknowledged General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1. No Issues Fire: 1. Utility Plan page 4 # 13 and # 14 are incomplete. Shall ? and Must ? Please finish the verbage to these statements. PRIOR TO CDB See the Civil Drawing 2. Utility Plan shows the Fire Hydrant to be used for the Fire Department Connection on page 4 of 6. Show the location of second Fire Hydrant for fire fighting within 300 feet of building. PRIOR TO CDB See the Civil Drawing 3. The height of this building is that of a HIGH RISE BUILDING, NFPA 101,Life Safety Code 2003 edition definition: 3.3.27.7 HIGH RISE BUILDING. A building greater than 23 in ( 75 feet ) in height where the building height is measured from the lowest level of fire department vehicle access to the floor of the highest occupiable story. MUST Meet the HIGH RISE w w Requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. ? Q The height of the building is 74'-0" The building is not a highrise, see sheet A3. c CUV a 4. Must meet Ordinance NO. 7617-06-Radio System Regulations for Buildings.Acknowledge U LU J p U PRIOR TO CDB 0 Z 0 Has been Acknowledged C3 Z g0 a Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 33 Harbor Master: • 1. No issues. Legal: 1. No issues. Land Resources: 1. No Issues. Landscaping: 1. Sheet 5 of 6 - Other than the one crape myrtle tree east of the elevator. recommend some ground cover or shnibs to fill out this area. See the Civil Drawings 2. Sheet 5 of 6 - With only 5.5 feet available for landscape treatment along the west side, suggest filling this area out with shrubs/groundcover rather than sod. See the Civil Drawings. 3. Sheet 5 of 6 - Will sod be planted in all areas not shown to receive trees, shrubs or groundcover? If so, state on plan. See the Civil Drawings 4. Sheet 5 of 6 - Crape myrtles need to be two-inch caliper. See the Civil Drawings. 5. Sheet 5 of 6 - Sand cordgrass has been shown to cover the entire northern retention pond, including the bottom. This groundcover is drought tolerant, good for xeriscaping. Will it survive in wet conditions? See the Civil Drawings Unclear why some type of similar landscaping is not proposed for at least a portion of the southern retention pond. See the Civil Drawings 6. Due to the request to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program, providing alternative landscape measures to meet the requirements of the Code or reasons why the elimination is necessary. See the Civil Drawings Parks and Recreation: 1. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4724 to calculate the assessment. Has been Acknowledged Storm water: 1. Prior to CDB the following conditions are to be met: 1) The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations 1' above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. Seethe Civil Drawings 2) The site plan is to show the proposed improvements on Baymont St that are proposed to be done by the developer of the Sand Pearl Resort. It is recommended that the outfall pipe for this site tie into the proposed inlet on Baymont as this system will have more capacity, rather than connected to inlet on Mandalay Ave. See the Civil Drawings Solid Waste: 1. No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1. Acknowledge that the vertical clear height of the parking garage is 8'2" to accommodate van accessible parking per ADA Florida Building Code Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.5. on both civil and architectural site plans. It has been acknowledged, a note has been added to sheet Al. 2. Demonstrate that a scaled 17.5' long passenger car can exit the two south end parking spaces without hitting any objects. See the Civil Drawings Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 34 • Walls and/or columns shall not obstruct parked motorist's visibility. Has been Acknowledged 4. Provide a 6' space between the off-site parallel parking spaces for better manueverability and pedestrian access. See the Civil Drawings The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: 1. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; Has been Acknowledged 2. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; - The Owner is to Provide 3. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; The Owner is to Provide 4. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building, Has been Acknowledged 5. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Has been Acknowledged 6. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Has been Acknowledged 7. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; Has been Acknowledged Z W W Q UZ ? N (D LLI Q -.+ W Orx Z. O Q. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 35 8. Potential condifionoproval to be included in the Staff Report: That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved S WFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. Has been Acknowledged Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; Has been Acknowledged 10. Sheet 3 - Revise the proposed height to 82-5". See the Civil Drawings. 11. The dumpster room is the same size as it was under the prior proposal denied by the CDB, yet three residential units have been eliminated and 4,350 square feet of retail space has been added. Is this room big enough for the retail uses? The residential units have a trash chute to dispose of their trash from their level. Operationally, how will the retail units dispose of their trash? There are areas at the rear of the retail available to use as dedicated trash areas dependent on the types of tenants and their needs. 12. If a commercial unit needs to install a grease trap, where will such be installed, since the sanitary sewer line exits the building on the north side through the retention pond? See the Civil Drawings. 13. Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Remove the curb on the east side of the trash staging area in order to get dumpster(s) into the trash staging area. See the Civil Drawings 14. Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Place a radius (not a 90-degree angle) at the corner of the northern parking space and the drive aisle for better maneuvering ability for a vehicle to access this northernmost space. See the Civil Drawings 15. Southwestern stairwell - Building/Fire Codes will require a sidewalk from the exit door to a. public way within the right-of-way. Show how this is being accomplished on all civil and landscape plans (minimum 44-inches wide). See the Civil Drawings 16. Architectural plans indicate that a/c units will be on top of the residential tower. Will this include the retail units, or will their a/c units be on their roof? Z M All of the A/C units will be on the roof above the residential units, see sheet A2. ca Q 17. Sheet A-1 - Will the eastern unit on the first floor have full use of the roof of the retail units as a terrace or will it be restricted to onl certain areas? If restrict d indi h t n th l LU N a y , e ca e suc o e p ans. > U The first floor unit will have a private access to the balcony above the retail. O go Z? nU CL Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 36 M I8. Colors on Sheet A-3 are inconsistent with the reduced 8.5"x11" colored elevations. Ensure written colors on Sheet A-3 have arrows to the appropriate areas, are the correct color and are sufficient to indicate the color scheme of the building. 19 20 21 22. 23 24. 25 26. 27 28. 29 The elevation colors are noted, see sheet A3. Civil plans - Need to show the covered entry at the southeast corner of the building. See the Civil Drawings. Show or state location of electric meters. If within a room next to elevator, indicate on the floor plans the location. If exterior to the building, show location. The electrical meters are to be on the outside wall of the electrical room, see sheet AL Sheet A2 - Roof plan appears to indicate there is a storage room on the roof above the sixth floor. Correct? If so, definition of "height, structure or building" does not permit such. Advise/revise. The room on the roof labeled as the mechanical room, see sheet A2. Need to include on Sheet 3 of 6 the mixed use calculation (being provided to you via email). See the Civil Drawings. Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise Total Required Parking to 40 spaces (not 31). See the Civil Drawings. Sheet 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Some columns are shown as white, some are black. Be consistent (prefer black). See the Civil Drawings. Sheet A3 - Provide finished floor elevation for first floor. It would also be extremely helpful to have the finished floor elevation for all floors and the flat roof deck for the a/c units. The floor elevations have been added to the elevations, see sheet A3. Sheet A3 - On the west elevation there is a stucco band at the bottom of the building on the south side. Is this band intended only at this location, or is it intended along all other elevations. Seems strange only at this one location. Revise elevations appropriately. The elevations have been revised, see sheet A3 Ground-level retail will be required to be flood proofed. With this design, ensure final design will incorporated flood proofing measures. If such design needs to change to accommodate flood proofing, show such change now. Has been Acknowledged Duron Smokey Topaz may be a little too dark. Revise to a lighter shade The design uses the same color choices previously approved The darker colors will lighten when w exposed to sunlight and are needed to give the design a base W Attachment D to the application indicates in "e" (last paragraph) that parking is screened from Q N street view. This is true on the east side, but what is happening on the north side? The plans (nor z > J written material) do not indicate how this is being addressed. Revise plans and written material. V a ?- 0 Uj C-% z C See the Civil Drawings. Q 0 Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 37 30. Provide a written a0s of how this proposal meets Beach by Desiaidelines (much like was done on the prior application), including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). See the Civil responses.. 31. Stem walls are proposed for the vertical portions of the retention ponds (north and south). What is being constructed on top of the stem wall for safety (wall, railing, etc.)? Is there any design of this decided yet? If so, provide/show. Additionally, there is no cross section of either pond. What is the slope of the ponds and will there be any fencing of these ponds required? If so, show. See the Civil Drawings. 32. Sheet 3 of 6 - Unclear of note on west side "concrete flum" (?). Advise/revise. See the Civil Drawings. 33. Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise arrow for "straight curb" note on the west side to the appropriate location. See the Civil Drawings. 34. Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise arrow for "(2) 20'x20' sight visibility triangle (typ)" to the appropriate location. See the Civil Drawings. 35. Per Building Code, the floor plan for the 5th & 6th level is correct showing two stairwells. Revise the West, North and South Elevations on Sheet A3 to show the second stairwell in the southwest comer of the building with the access walkway to the stairwell (shown correctly on prior proposal). The stairway has been revised, see shed A3. 36. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria 41 - Response says that the parking "is within an enclosed parking garage which is designed to be perceived as an extension of the residential units above." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. See the Civil Drawings. 37. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #4 - Response needs to reference the parking demand study for the reduction of required parking. See the Civil Drawings. 38. Attachment D - Criteria #ta - Response says in the first sentence the increase to height is from 30 feet. In the Tourist District, this height is 35 feet. Revise. See the Civil Drawings'. 39. Attachment D - Criteria #lb - Response states the parking is "enclosed and located behind the retail shops." Reality is not the case as written- Parking extends beyond the building envelop on w w the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont c? 0 Street. Revise response. C See the Civil Drawings. 0 U O a Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 38 ^= 40. Attachment D - Cri #Ie -Response states the parking "is screen the first floor building walls from street vilrReality is not the case as written. Parking eAW beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. See the Civil Drawings. 41. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #I - a. Revise response in third sentence from "25" feet to "35" feet. b. You need to state that you are requesting setback reductions (to the front [east and north] and to the side [west]). Need to reference that Beach by Design desires/mandates the building at a zero front setback to Mandalay Avenue. See the Civil Drawings. 42. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - It is noted that the project will not be "self contained" as the total required off-street parking is not being provided on-site. See the Civil Drawings. 43. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Unclear as to meaning of the next to last sentence. You say this project "exceeds" the setbacks of the Sandpearl project on the east. They were approved at a zero setback on the east, just as you are requesting. See the Civil Drawings. 44. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6b - This is referring to the Beach by Design Guidelines. Provide appropriate response. See the Civil Drawings. 45. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6c - First sentence of the second paragraph - Response states the parking "is screened by the first floor building walls from street view." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. See the Civil Drawings. 46. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6d - Expand on the response, especially in terms of changes in horizontal building planes, use of architectural details, variety in materials, colors and textures, distinctive fenestration patterns and distinctive roof forms. See the Civil Drawing's. 47 48. Sheet 3 of 6 - Confirm that the proposed vehicular area listed is for that part of the pavement not under the building (meaning, you don't need to count that pavement under the building as vehicular use area, since you cannot plant landscaping under the building). See the Civil Drawings. Sheet A3 - Provide a dimension on the north elevation as to the vertical height of the building over the drive aisle. I. - Z The dimensions have been added to the elevation, see sheet A3. ? Q ?! "4 ' 0 ...t Z Z v a 44. Sheet A3 - It appea propriate design to replicate the rusticated areas shown on the south side of the 92IWers also on the west stair tower. See sheet A3. 50. Sheet A3 - a. Unclear why rusticated stucco is proposed on only the western dwelling unit facade on the first level, rather than just stippled stucco. b. Unclear why stippled stucco is not shown in all locations on all elevations, except where rusticated stucco is indicated. c. West Elevation - Show the lines of the eastern stair tower on Levels 4 and 5 (just like Level 6). d. North and West Elevations - Unclear why the rusticated stucco is not continued on the ground level onto the north and west elevations. e. South Elevation - Rusticated stucco location and height on the stair towers should be consistent (seeing as the western stair tower needs to extend up to the sixth level). See sheet A3. 51. Sheet Al - a. First, Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the dining room projects from the main face of the building on the west side. b. Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the balconies in the bedrooms projects from the wall and the kitchen projects from the main face of the building on the east side. c. First, Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the building indents from the eastern edge of the elevator to the open walkway area and the distance from the eastern wall of bedroom #3 to the open walkway area. d. First Level - It appears an extra column has been added to the balcony for the eastern unit. See sheet Al. 52. Sheet A2 - a. Fourth Level - Provide the dimension for the distance the gazebo by the pool projects from the main face of the building on the west side. b. Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the balconies in the bedrooms projects from the wall and the kitchen projects from the main face of the building on the east side. c. Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the building indents from the eastern edge of the elevator to the open walkway area and the distance from the eastern wall of bedroom #3 to the open walkway area. d. Fifth & Sixth Levels - It appears that columns north of Stairwell #2 need to be shown on the western side. See sheet AZ 53. Sheet A3 - Based on the floor plans on Sheets AI and A2: a. North Elevation - On the west side of the eastern unit, the column, should be solid (structural), not a double decorative column. b. West Elevation - On the left hand side (for the eastern unit), the balcony column should look like that on the East Elevation, not a double decorative column. c. North Elevation - For both the eastern and western units, there is a middle column shown on the balcony that the floor plan doesn't show. d. South Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. e. West Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation for the balconies Z a for the First, Second & Third Levels, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the cc Z double decorative column, change the floor plans. f East Elevation - On the floor plans for all Levels, the design for the balconies for bedrooms % V ? ? C & 3 for the eastern units are shown similar to that for the balconies for the master bedroom fb w to ., the western units. Based on the western elevation for these balconies, is it the intention to hav - ? Z u the eastern balconies in these bedrooms look like the west side? West side elevation looks nicer. - ? 1 0 z ? z? See sheet A3. g U a ?? i 54. Sheet A2 - Pool must be handicap accessible. Will you be installing a lift? Other: The lift is shown on sheet A2. No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 1/16/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by. noon, 12/14/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Sincerely, Robert M. Weimer Architect #2955 Z M ? w us B ' d< 5 LU Uj O ? Z z ?. • r Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 7:29 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - Attached are the Draft comments for the December 7, 2006, DRC meeting for the above referenced project. The meeting time is 1:15 pm. I am also attaching the mixed use calculation. Wayne Mixed Use draft 12.7.06 dre :alculation for 490 .. action agend... 0 0 Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. Land Development Consulting • Engineering • Planning • Transportation • Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 November 7, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2"d Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Gionis by the Sea (490 N. Mandalay Avenue) Parking Analysis Dear Mr. Wells: NOV 0 7 2006 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT CITY OF CLEAR1hWrER Per our discussion enclosed are three (3) copies of the Parking Analysis for the Gionis by the Sea redevelopment. This analysis was conducted in accordance with a specific methodology established with Neil Thompson and demonstrates adequate parking exists to support the redevelopment of the site with 19 on-site parking spaces. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this report. Sincerely, Robert Pe ?2ricp Principal Cc Nick Gionis Keith Zayac 06-072 ° 0 CITY OF CLEORWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARWATER. C OM November 03, 2006 Keith Zayac VIA FAX: 727-793-9855 701 Enterprise Road East Suite 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 RE: FLD2006-10057 -- 490 MANDALAY AVE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-10057. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on December 07, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, r, -4 t? - wa WaWells, AICP yn Planner III Letter of Completeness -FLD2006-10057 - 490 MANDALAYAVE 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 8:28 AM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original is being mailed. Wayne letter of ,mpleteness 11.3.06 • • Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 8:43 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2006-07044, 1721 Gulf to Bay Boulevard I will bring over today. By the way I spoke with Rick Albee and he said we don't need a tree inventory for Gionis. I will be bringing over the Comp. Infill applications this morning to insert. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <keith@keithzayac.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 6:33 PM Subject: FLD2006-07044, 1721 Gulf to Bay Boulevard Keith - I need 15 sets of the reduced (8.5"x11") copies of the revised site and landscape plans for the above referenced project for the CDB. They were left out of the resubmittal packages. Thanks. Wayne 1 ° 0 CITY OF CLEA RWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER. COM October 30, 2006 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Suite 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 VIA FAX: 727-793-9855 RE: FLD2006-10057 -- 490 MANDALAY AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-10057. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Since the proposal is for "mixed use" of retail and attached dwellings and Mixed Use is not a use listed in the Tourist District, the proposal must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. A "regular" FLD application has been filed. Need to fill out and submit a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application form. 2. Provide a tree inventory, prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. 3. Provide a PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces) (preferably one that relates to the subject site and not 1721 Gulf to Bay Boulevard). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by noon on Thursday, November 2, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, kM. Iva Wayn Wells Planner III Letter oflncompleteness - FLD2006-10057 - 490 MANDALAYAVE P_.? Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 7:21 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original letter is being mailed. Wayne T letter of completeness 10.30 r. ? .• DROP AT ALL OPoYE$ i.-'- I-I/2•R wEARwc suRFACE GRAPHIC SCALE z 3?...;.... BASE SUBGRADE rc Al 1(mealm)rt LEGEND T r T-i a 1 ± 1 .. ? ? f (TTP) TIPICII F PRO.ECT BOUNDARY J_ rnE AA "` STRAIGHT CURB TTPC a .y` .fir cMyiWD rRFE ro BB rEMmm } x <I •t INDl c IG T 0y? Sgg ?, () au mPl 0-.^'- " Y PBaasfa aNaarE PAwILNr _ : ) .,::,...m-. mW 'rolgr". I x t? r Pm weT AT61 - 4 BA Jxria".L alpss?l -/ t> u ,M.? GENERA NOTES: ?L J isa YMONT BTRE APf?43.N - _ ^^? J} ... ....., r" L _ 1. FNdNEERMNOSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH UYAC 4 ASSOdAIES, INC. L? a ' pa9aP'nmlielW n" ... __ '1w1 FA rMaelifr? / 404 r ..... ............. - ."YC ) 701 ENTERPRISE FL 31 _- __ A 695 EAST. SUITE W m (J2J) ]9}9868 Bu. (727 J9}9855 i9x 2. SITE ADDRESS it: 490 MANDALAY AVE. a a CLEARWATER. R M757 O '- x" )J tt 'Y3?' , {} x5i 'm PARMID: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 'r Q . _? J?.. PT2 ;) ZONNG: T. I ti, nl-; I I if 5 PRESENT USE 1 RESTAURANT k 2 COMMERCIAL BUILDING C3 W 4. OEVI10PE0 USE 9 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS d 4350 E.9 RETAIL STORE . G wnr__+..w I jtR f ABAUeT WIa T 5. TOTAL SITE AREA 17,457.58 IF (0.40 ACRE) W d HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL -• 5' 9?j a •W1 6. SETBACKS: 15' MONT 13.00' MQISNE.?NORTN TO eLDGJIER U Aqr' I P.P. 60 )y 0.00' (tNORTH TO OUMPS STACMC AREA) o.oo' (EAST rO auadxc) FT-T ' I 4 £ - 10' SIDE ISO MIN. (NEST TO PAVEMENT) ` ILI w --111T1i. Aii ?• ie ?n?'' 7. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 3S'-100' FT PROPOSED BLDG HEIGHT 95'-0' FROM FEMA LINE TO MID-PdNT OF ROOF. ••..®er bi I F?''II fl SOLID WASTE DUMPSTER WLL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING C F T h tt. .?. C4 •? " a? I ,,,?A? ??, I n b ;# jPh) 9. UGHTNC WiNIN PR0.ECT BOUNDARIES WLL BE ATTACHED r0 co °°•• I ' yi. C MrAWM BUILDING AND WLL BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF FlNAL BUIUWNG PLANS O [rrdl] AN1 TG1W b ?(i-.. X I i 10. EiGSDNG BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS - 8,255 SF - 0.14 ACRE III A`w Mp P??1 I ( I )I 11. Au DISTURBED GRASS WTWN RIGHT-OF-WAY 91ALL BE SODDED. f Ala ???FtL'??P ()rP) '1. `ll A W. \ Y ampV r 2. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUG BE RENO WD AND REPLACED N CURB g g 9GEWAI.K, AND LANDSCAPING TO MA1DH -SING CONOITp1S t' j ' - p I ?? i I FLDOO ZONE: C C 1X15 STRUCTURE APPEARS TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE 'AE' (EL 12), HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAI "• m_ ?l ACCORDING TD THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL A¢{ v NUMBER 125096 0102 G. MAP REVISED DATE SEPTEMBER 3. 200., PROVIDED BY THE EEOERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. Pa? Q k r s.r •a $ ?r•.. 1 6 9RaCfl) .T I I (( III 14. THE PROJECT 9GNAGE WLL MEET THE CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE. A r 15 THERE ARE NO UTU1Y EASEMENTS IOENTFlEO BY THE SURVEY. C LIT Ib TroRAL dMWAT Goo 9:CiroN _ _ .. _ _._._._._._._.._.._.._?. _.._. YI )a7 11, 1 EAE ARE NO ENNROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE PLAN YEW ?y-__._.._..___._..___._._._...._.._.._. _._.._.._.._.._.._.._..! xT, ' i. 1 !E 4F ' ]. IS 5200 BUILDING TON PER IMPACT FEE IS DUE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR TO r Spa ISSUANCE OF' OR FlNAL PLAT IT APPLICABLE) WT11CH EYDi OCCURS FlRST. a k CONTACT ARRT RADDER PERMt MIAOER AT 72).%2.4824. B 8 a 18. DUMPSTER SERVICE SHALL BE ARRANGED WIN SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIM TO THE g ISSUANCE U AN OCCUPATONAL UCENSE OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. ?` ?±A•s ?w?,•P ,Ay s' j, PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT 727.5624930 - - 9:CTIN A?-A ry SECT. _ A TOM a SITE AREA 7.4ss (aw A) 17.457.s7 (aa Ac) taooo.ao s .?.r?» •?rr.r.»r..rr i ___.._.._.. _.._.._.._.ti ;rj _.._.._._._.. 4s®g®g _ ?I $L L?'C»^L`T 2 ?TS:rz'?? j u i B TDru OPEN SPAa t6aT s (am Ac) Azu.sz s (alz Ac) e7zM sF (am Ac M9I.) ...?.. ?.....?. m. . acre JP; (i C. BUILDING FOOTPRINT 6.255 SF 9.92231 4 1),45zs6 Si. (1.0 FM) BBpB •°?'u:as'r?.:..r» !?^'r:. •;..L- ............... • r».?.r..r.r T u71 0. 90EWNN/OECN/PAHD AREA: 9.519.58 4 3,303 3 p; .......... - VN •?1»Q•.??r??• ?r by E. TOTAL 01PERMS ARG 15174.56 S (0.90 ISR) 1222531 S (a70 M) 10.584.82 S (0.9519! MAIL) @p!9 I N F. PARKING WALES 26 TACES 19 SPACES (M-STE) (9x2 SPMFS/UNT) ? (4.350 S.F. MAX5 PER 1000 U.) xr A',Y.3, S,? ,jh roiAL REWRED. 315PM33 t } N T f i '"'•- a TENCUWL AREA 7.69184 S 2824 7 .7 N NIFRKIR WUSGPE AREA N/A N/A N/A L WLR FA Y UNITS D 9 UNiS 12 LINTS (311 UNCIIAGE) ase,At m/nN ?.. iFti i/ sI[Br? 1 ETA, SNER h SEANCES 8.215 IF. (Q35 FAA) 4.350 S.F. (0.28 FM) 17,157.58 (1.0 FM) _ _ .., ...., 3 OF 6 T • . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:50 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Fw: Gionis update Wayne, please accept the attached site plan and this email as a request to re-submit this project as a substantial change to the previously denied project by CDB. The site plan has been revised to include 9 multifamily units, first floor retail and 19 parking spaces. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: Hallo Zandy To: Keith Zayac Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:03 PM Subject: Gionis update Please find latest site plan Hallo Zandy Keith Zayac & Assoc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Phone: 727-793-9888 -Fax: 727-793-9855 DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. (KZA) makes the electronically stored data available for information purposes only. No warranty, either expressed or implied, is made regarding the accuracy or reliability of the aforementioned data. KZA reserves the right to revise, update, and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility for any images which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to verify the data to ascertain its accuracy for the intended use. KZA makes every effort to ensure the data is virus free; however, KZA assumes no responsibility for damages caused by the installation/use of the enclosed data. Use of the enclosed data indicates the user accepts the conditions contained herein. Please note, in some cases final approval may not have been issued by all the permitting agencies; hence, modifications, which are not depicted on the enclosed electronically stored data, may be required. Unless other arrangements have been agreed to, use of the electronically stored data for any activities shall proceed solely at the risk and responsibility of recipient/user of said electronically stored data. Additionally, any use of the enclosed electronically stored data shall relieve KZA and/or any of its employees from liability/responsibility regarding any modifications to said electronically stored data which may be required due to reviewing agencies' comments and/or final design revisions/modifications. 10/26/2006 f? • 10/26/06 Mixed Use Calculation for Gionis Property - 490 Mandalay Avenue A. Property is zoned Tourist District (maximum FAR =1.0 and maximum density = 30 du/acre) 1. Permitted FAR ..................................................................1.0 2. Building square footage of non-residential portion .....................x 4,350 sf 3. Lot area required to support non-residential use in the building ......= 4,350 sf 4. Lot area ....................................................................... 17,457.56 sf 5. Subtract the lot area required to support non-residential use in the building (#A3) .................................. 4,350 sf 6. Lot area (sf) to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units ...= 13,107.56 sf 7. Divide #A6 ..................................................................... 13,107.56 sf 8. Land area in an acre ........................................................... 43,560 sf 9. Lot acreage ....................................................................= 0.300 acres 10. Multiply lot acreage ........................................................... 0.300 acres 11. Maximum density .............................................................x 30 du/acre 12. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ............................ = 9 du Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 7:46 AM To: 'John R. Hixenbaugh' Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Avenue, Gionis Mandalay 490 Mandalay 490 ;tall Report for.velopment OrdE John - This application was filed February 24, Development Order for your information. this application. Wayne 2006. I am attaching the Staff Report and There were no prior applications filed prior to -----Original Message----- From: John R. Hixenbaugh [mailto:JHixenbaugh@trenam.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:05 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Avenue, Gionis Wayne, In looking at the report, it appears that a plan was considered in September 2006 was denied. Would you have access to the date as to when that application was filed? Were there any other applications submitted by Gionis prior to the September 2006 plan mentioned in the report? I very much appreciate your time and assistance. John John R. Hixenbaugh, AICP CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail, by forwarding this to postmaster@trenam.com or by telephone at (727) 898-7474 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. For more information about Trenam Kemker, please visit our website: www.trenam.com. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:24 PM 1 4. 0 To: John R. Hixenbaugh Subject: 490 Mandalay Avenue, Gionis <<Mandalay 490 Staff Report.doc>> <<Mandalay 490 Development Order 1.17.07.doc>> Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III 727-562-4504 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 7:48 AM To: 'John R. Hixenbaugh' Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Avenue, Gionis John - This application was filed October 27, 2006. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: John R. Hixenbaugh [mailto:JHixenbaugh@trenam.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 20072:59 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Avenue, Gionis Wayne, Thanks very much. This information is really helpful. One last question for now. Can you please tell me when the application was filed and accepted by Clearwater? Thanks. John John R. Hixenbaugh, AICP CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail, by forwarding this to postmaster@trenam.com or by telephone at (727) 898-7474 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you. For more information about Trenam Kemker, please visit our website: www.trenam.com. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:24 PM To: John R. Hixenbaugh Subject: 490 Mandalay Avenue, Gionis <<Mandalay 490 Staff Report.doc>> <<Mandalay 490 Development order 1.17.07.doc>> Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III 727-562-4504 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:24 PM To: 'jhixenbaugh@trenam.com' Subject: 490 Mandalay Avenue, Gionis 1E Mandalay 490 Mandalay 490 Staff Report. docvelopment OrdE Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III 727-562-4504 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 9:09 AM To: 'Mike Petagna' Subject: RE: Sand pearl/Gionis mike - The Flexible Development (FLD) application was recently approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on January 16, 2007. There has been no submission to-date for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the FLD. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Mike Petagna [mailto:mikep@jmcdev.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:11 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Sandpearl/Gionis Wayne, We are fielding quite a few questions from concerned customers about the Gionis project and we are trying to make sure that we have all our facts straight. Can you tell me whether or not Gionis has plans in for a building permit yet? That seems to be the million dollar question. Thanks, Michael Petagna JMC Design & Development 727-443-6585 1 • • ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: January 16, 2007 Case Number: FLD2006-10057 Agenda Item: E3 Owner/Applicant: Mary G Realty, Inc. Representative: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Address: 490 Mandalay Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 80.17 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a sight visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. CURRENT ZONING: Tourist (T) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Resort Facilities High (RFH) Category USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Shopping center with retail sales and restaurant Proposed Use: Mixed Use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) EXISTING North: Tourist (T) District Overnight accommodation use (under SURROUNDING ZONING construction - Sandpearl) AND USES: South: Tourist (T) District Attached dwellings and retail sales (under construction - Sandpearl) East: Tourist (T) District Shopping center (retail sales and restaurants), retail sales West: Tourist (T) District Attached dwellings (under construction - Sandpearl) Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 -Page l of 12 • • ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.4 acres is located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. The site is basically a rectangle, but with the Mandalay Avenue side being slightly longer in length. The site is currently developed with a small shopping center of 6,254 square feet of five commercial units and a restaurant. The existing building and other site improvements will be demolished. This site is located in the "Destination Resort" District of Beach by Design. On September 19, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) denied a Flexible Development application for this property to permit 12 attached dwellings on this property (FLD2006-02009). This application contained various setback reductions and a proposed building height of 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof). Property to the north is currently being developed with the Sandpearl hotel of 253 rooms (height of 95 feet). The property to the west and south is currently being developed as part of the Sandpearl project with a high-rise residential building to the west (height of 150 feet) and a low-rise residential building to the south over ground-level retail sales floor area (approximately 8,300 square feet) directly fronting on Mandalay Avenue (height of 48.5 feet). The property at the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street has been developed with the Belle Harbor high-rise residential project (two towers of heights of 99 and 130 feet). The property to the east across Mandalay Avenue is developed with one and two story retail sales buildings and the two-story Pelican Walk shopping center. A four-story parking garage with three additional residential floors of 28 attached dwelling units (70-foot height) has been approved to replace the existing parking lot for the Pelican Walk shopping center (FLD2004- 09072/TDR2005-01015, approved by the CDB on April 19, 2005). Building permits for this Pelican Walk construction have been submitted and are being reviewed (BCP2006-04025). Development Proposal: The prior development proposal for this property denied by the CDB was solely residential with 12 attached dwelling units and no retail sales floor area. This site is located in the "Destination Resort" District of Beach by Design. This District specifically calls for mixed use development for this property with retail sales floor area adjacent to Mandalay Avenue to activate the street, as envisioned by Beach by Design. This new development proposal for the subject property is for a mixed use of nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area, the preferred form of redevelopment, in compliance with the vision in Beach by Design for this area and site specifically. The proposal is similar to the adjacent Sandpearl project to the south by providing a mixed use with retail and residential uses fronting on Mandalay Avenue. Mixed use, however, is not a use provided for in the Tourist (T) District, and is the reason such request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The retail floor area has been designed to provide for as many as four retail units facing Mandalay Avenue at a zero front setback. Nine attached dwellings are proposed above the ground floor retail area in a building and floor plan design similar to that previously proposed in September 2006. The building is 80.17 feet tall (to mid-point of pitched roof). Two dwellings per floor with approximately 2,425 square feet of conditioned living area for the west unit and 2,517 square feet of conditioned living area for the east unit are proposed on the first three residential floors. The fourth residential floor contains one dwelling unit of 2,517 square feet of conditioned living area on the east side of the building and a pool and recreation area on the west side. The fifth and sixth residential floors contain one dwelling unit each of 2,517 square feet of conditioned living area on the east side of the building. A total of 19 parking spaces are proposed on-site, primarily located under the building west of the retail floor area. The proposed building looks much like that reviewed by the CDB in September 2006. Unit designs/layout and unit entry locations have not changed from that previously submitted, with unit entries Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 2 of 12 • • on the south side of the building and the unit in a linear layout south to north. The western facade is 105.83 feet in overall length (north/south). Beach by Design Guidelines requiring the facades of buildings greater than 100 feet to have offsets of greater than five feet. The western stairwell extends 7'- 4" from the facade, reducing the otherwise overall length below 100 feet. A balcony for the master bedroom, extending 3'-6" from the facade, and the dining room, extending 2'-10" from the facade further breaks up the western facade. The eastern facade is 144'-2" feet in overall length (north/south). This overall eastern facade length includes the ground level retail sales portion of the building (119'-8") and a covered entry for the residential lobby on the south side of the building (separated from the retail sales portion by a minimum of five feet). The retail sales portion of the building is similar in location and length as the Sandpearl retail sales portion of their building directly to the south. The residential portion of the building for the first through sixth floors is much the same as previously reviewed in September 2006. There is a building indentation on the east side of the building of approximately 24 feet directly north of the elevator. The two bedrooms along the eastern facade extend from the main facade by five feet, which also includes balconies extending an additional 3'-6", as well as the kitchen extends 2'-10" from the main facade to break up the eastern facade. Main unit balconies are on the north end of the units as an extension of the living rooms. The unit on the fourth floor does not have any windows on the west side, except in the living room, due to the elevated pool to the west of this dwelling unit. The unit on the fifth floor will have windows along its length, except most are high windows due to the pool area on the fourth floor with its trellises. The unit on the sixth floor will have normal windows for the length of the unit. The elevator, stairwell and residential lobby tower on the southeast corner of the building will have lobby windows on the east side facing Mandalay Avenue on each floor. Beach by Design Guidelines requires as least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has submitted information that the project is in compliance with the 60 percent Guideline through the use of windows, sliding glass doors, aluminum railings, banding, balconies, rusticated (diamond scored) stucco and trim to meet this requirement. The proposed building has been designed using a Mediterranean architectural theme. The ground level parking and retail sales level utilizes a diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz. The sixth living floor also utilizes this same diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz. The exterior of living floors one through five are finished with stucco painted "restrained gold. Insets finished with the same diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz are proposed on the facades of the stairwells on the south side of the building. The roof is primarily a pitched roof finished with "monier Madeira blend" shades of clay barrel tiles (there is a flat area in the center of the building on the south side of the building for mechanical equipment). Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) and Density Pursuant to the Countywide Future Land Use Plan, the maximum allowable F.A.R. for properties with a designation of Resort Facilities High is 1.0 and the maximum density is 30 dwelling units per acre. As a mixed use, the maximum development potential of the property is based on a mixed-use calculation. A mixed-use calculation indicates a maximum of 4,350 square feet of nonresidential floor area and nine dwelling units, which is that contained in this proposal. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan with regard to the maximum allowable F.A.R. and maximum allowable density. Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): Pursuant to Section 2-801.1 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable I.S.R. is 0.95. The overall proposed I.S.R. is 0.70, which is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Mixed use is not a use provided for in the Tourist (T) District, and is the reason such request must be processed as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, comparison can be made to "Attached Dwellings" and "Retail Sales and Services". Pursuant to Table 2- Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 3 of 12 803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum lot area for both uses can range between 5,000 - 10,000 square feet. The subject property is 17,457 square feet in area. Pursuant to the same Table, the minimum lot width for both uses can range between 50 - 100 feet. The lot width of the subject property along Mandalay Avenue is 180.52 feet and along Baymont Street is 100.35 feet. Based on this comparison, the proposal is consistent with the Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum front setback for attached dwellings and retail sales can range between 0 - 15 feet and the minimum side setback can range between 0 - 10 feet. The proposal includes a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk). This proposal has introduced the retail sales portion of the building at a zero front setback along Mandalay Avenue to be in conformance with the vision contained in the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. Due to the configuration of the property along Baymont Street producing an angle and a slightly longer front property line along Mandalay Avenue, the proposed retail sales portion of the building is located at a 13-foot front setback at its northwest corner from Baymont Street (the northeast corner of the building is located 18 feet from Baymont Street). The building will have a refuse collection room on the ground floor on the south side of the parking level. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback at a zero front setback from Baymont Street is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on- site and is common with many newer developments. The introduction of the retail sales floor area along Mandalay Avenue has pushed the location of the redesigned building and parking toward the west. The proposed building meets the required 10-foot side setback on the west side. The surface parking is now located 5.5 feet from the west property line. The two-story parking garage for the Sandpearl project, which is basically a blank wall adjacent to the south and west sides of the subject property, is located five feet from the common property line. The proposed parking for this proposal is consistent with the setback reductions approved for the Sandpearl project from the common property line. Building Code requires a sidewalk from the western stairwell out to a public way. To accomplish this, the applicant has provided a four-foot wide sidewalk along the west and south sides of the southern retention pond, producing a six-foot side setback from the south property line. Proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the maximum allowable height for attached dwellings and retail sales can range between 35 - 100 feet. The proposed building has been determined to have a pitched roof at a height of 80.17 feet above Base Flood Elevation (BFE), which is slightly shorter than that previously proposed in September 2006 at 82.5 feet. Building height requirements by Code provisions are measured from BFE. The proposed height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area (see heights of buildings under "Site Location and Existing Conditions" above). It is also noted that the two Mandalay Beach Club residential towers between Papaya and San Marco Streets west of Mandalay Avenue were approved/constructed at a height of 145 feet. The site is within a Flood Zone A and the Building Code does not permit the habitable area of the residential portion of the building to be situated below BFE; however, the retail sales portion may be below BFE as long as it is floodproofed. Based on these provisions, as well as having to meet vertical clearance requirements for handicap parking spaces, this usually means that parking for the project is accommodated on the ground floor and the building height is increased accordingly. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Code with regard to the maximum allowable height. Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 4 of 12 s • Minimum Off-Street Parking: The proposal will take sole access to Baymont Street. An existing driveway on Mandalay Avenue will be eliminated, a sidewalk consistent with that existing on Mandalay Avenue will be constructed and at least one additional on-street parking space will be created on Mandalay Avenue. The City will install parking meters for any new parking spaces created on Mandalay Avenue. Pursuant to Table 2-803 of the Community Development Code, the minimum required parking for attached dwellings is two spaces per dwelling unit and retail sales and services can range between four - five spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA. Based on nine dwelling units (18 required spaces) and the proposed 4,350 square feet of proposed retail sales floor area (17 - 22 required spaces), a minimum of between 35 and 40 total parking spaces are required for this development. The applicant proposes 19 parking spaces on-site, including one handicap space, to accommodate the residential units in the building. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces. Section 2-803.K for retail sales and services in the Tourist District provides the following criteria for a parking reduction: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes. b. Adjacent land uses are of a nature that there is a high probability that patrons will use modes of transportation other than the automobile to access the use; c. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted providing the justification for the reduction. The proposed reduction basically centers on the retail uses, where the proposal eliminates all required parking for the retail sales uses. Retail sales uses are envisioned as specialty, non-destination beach related retail shops that will draw their customers from pedestrians walking along Mandalay Avenue and from hotels/motels and attached dwellings within the area. The Parking Demand Study indicates adequate parking within municipal parking lots, on-street parking and from other uses within close proximity to serve the proposed retail sales floor area. The Beach Trolley also stops near the site. Adequate parking is available within a reasonable walking distance of the project to support the requested reduction. This reduction is consistent with other similar uses along Mandalay Avenue and in the downtown area of Clearwater. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Code with regard to the minimum required number of parking spaces. Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-20LD.1 of the Community Development Code, all outside mechanical equipment shall be screened so as not to be visible from public streets and/or abutting properties. The applicant proposes all air conditioning units for both residential and retail sales units on the roof above the sixth residential floor. Parapets around that portion of the roof should screen views of the air conditioning units from the ground and from dwelling units equal in height as this proposed building, except from dwelling units on higher floors in the Sandpearl high-rise tower to the west. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Code with regard to screening of outdoor mechanical equipment. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, to minimize hazards at street or driveway intersections, no structures or landscaping may be installed which Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-1.0057 - Page 5 of 12 9 r will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. There is only one driveway proposed for this property on Baymont Street. There are no structures within the driveway's sight triangles inconsistent with the Code requirement. There is a sight visibility triangle along the property lines at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. A small corner of the proposed retail sales building encroaches into this sight visibility triangle. The intent of the sight visibility triangles is to enable those vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing a right- of-way and those vehicles stopped at a stop bar while leaving a site to have a clear and unobstructed view of one another. The proposed encroachment of the small corner of the retail sales building upon the sight visibility triangle at the street intersection will not result in a conflict with this intent, as those vehicles stopped at the stop bar on Baymont Street will still have adequate and safe clear and unobstructed view of vehicles and/or pedestrians traversing Mandalay Avenue. These encroachments upon the sight visibility triangles will not result in the grant of a special privilege as similar reductions have been approved elsewhere under similar circumstances. It is noted that the City's Engineering Department has indicated support for this request. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with respect to allowing the small building encroachment within the sight visibility triangles at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street as set forth in Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. The civil site plan for this proposal indicates that all on- site electric and communication lines will be placed underground in conformance with this Code requirement. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13 of the Community Development Code, there are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District for this site. Because there is less than 4,000 square feet of paved vehicular use area outside of the building footprint, no interior landscape area is required for this site (Section 3-1202.E.1). Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.2, a foundation landscape area of a minimum five- foot width is required along the building frontage of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. The proposal includes a request to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The requirement for foundation landscaping is at odds with the goal of having the building adjacent to the property line to activate the street, as envisioned by Beach by Design. The elimination of the foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue is consistent with the adjacent Sandpearl retail sales to the south of this property. A surface retention pond is provided on the north side of the building, designed utilizing the building as a vertical wall to provide the required pond capacity. Having the pond at this location and with this design eliminates the ability to provide landscaping along the foundation meeting Code requirements. However, the applicant is landscaping this area with viburnam shrubs and cabbage palms along the east, north and west edges of the top of the retention pond, which could be viewed as providing an alternative to the requirement. The slope and bottom of the pond will also be planted with sand cordgrass, which will also soften the north edge of the building. A grassed retention area is also proposed on the south side of the site between the proposed building and the Sandpearl parking garage and retail sales. This southern retention pond will have vertical walls on three sides, except adjacent to Mandalay Avenue. A viburnam hedge will be along the top of bank adjacent to Mandalay Avenue. The site will be landscaped along its perimeter with a viburnam hedge, accented on the west with Indian hawthorn. A landscape area between the residential lobby entrance on Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 6 of 12 ® • _ the south side of the building and the retail portion of the building will be landscaped with a crape myrtle tree and Indian hawthorn shrubs. A viburnam hedge with cabbage palms will shield the parking spaces closest to Baymont Street. Cabbage palms, crape myrtle trees and oleander shrubs will accent the southwest corner of the site. The northwest corner of the site adjacent to Baymont Street will be accented with cabbage palms and hibiscus shrubs. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A N/A automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A N/A comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The elimination of the foundation landscaping along the east (Mandalay Avenue) and north (Baymont Street) sides of the building is included in the Comprehensive Landscape Program request. As expressed above, the proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria, as discussed above. Solid Waste: The development proposal includes a trash room adjacent to the elevator off of the residential lobby. A trash chute is provided to the residential units on each floor to deposit their trash. This trash room is of adequate size for the number of dwelling units proposed, however, it may not be adequate for both the residential and retail sales units. The architect has advised that there are areas at the rear of the retail units available to use as dedicated trash areas dependent on the types of tenants and their needs. This should be conditioned on any approval of this case to ensure adequate screened trash facilities are provided for both residential and retail sales units. A dumpster and recycling staging area on the west side of the driveway at Baymont Street has been provided to allow truck pickup of dumpsters and recycling bins. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si a e: The applicant is proposing only attached signage for the retail sales units facing Mandalay Avenue with this development proposal and has indicated that all signage will meet the City's Sign Code requirements. It is unlikely, due to the location of the proposed retail sales portion of the building at a zero front setback on Mandalay Avenue, any freestanding signage will be necessary. Any approval of Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 7 of 12 • • this application, however, should include a condition requiring any future freestanding signage to be a monument-style sign meeting Code requirements and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Code Enforcement Analysis: There is an active Code Enforcement case for this property dealing with property maintenance issues (CDC2006-01332). Such issues should have little bearing on the outcome of this application and is something the property owner should be addressing. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. 1.0 Mixed use calculation X] I.S.R. 0.95 0.70 X Density 30 dwelling units per acre Mixed use calculation X1 Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 square feet 17,457 square feet X Lot Width North: 50 - 100 feet 100.35 feet X East: 50 - 100 feet 180.52 feet X Setbacks Front: 0 - 15 feet North: 13 feet (to X1 building); zero feet (to trash staging area) East: zero feet (to X' building) Side: 0 -10 feet South: six feet (to X1 sidewalk) West: 5.5 feet (to X1 pavement) Height 35 -100 feet 80.17 feet X1 Off-Street Attached dwellings - Two spaces per 19 parking spaces X' Parking unit; Retail sales - 4 - 5 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA 35 - 40 spaces) t See Analysis above. Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 8 of 12 • COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and atvnronriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 9 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of December 7, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The subject 0.4 acres is located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street; 2. The current use of the site is for a shopping center with retail sales and a restaurant; 3. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Destination Resort" District; 4. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a mixed-use building of nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area and represents the preferred form of redevelopment, in compliance with the vision in Beach by Design for this area and site specifically; 5. The retail floor area has been designed to provide for as many as four retail units facing Mandalay Avenue at a zero front setback in compliance with the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; 6. The proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; 7. The proposed building height is 80.17 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The applicant proposes 19 parking spaces on-site, including one handicap space, to accommodate the nine residential units in the building at two parking spaces per unit; 9. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces; 10. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted providing the justification for the parking reduction; 11. The design of the residential portion of the proposed building is similar to that reviewed in September 2006; 12. The retail sales portion of the proposed building is compatible with other projects in the vicinity, including the Sandpearl project adjacently south; Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 10 of 12 13. The requested elimination of the foundation landscaping along the east (Mandalay Avenue) and north (Baymont Street) sides of the building, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria; and 14. That there is an active Code Enforcement case for this property regarding property maintenance issues, which has little bearing on the decision of this application. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a mixed use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 80.17 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a sight visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all dumpsters be enclosed within trash rooms or screened trash areas, including those for the commercial units, acceptable to the Planning and Solid Waste Departments, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 5. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That, prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant revise the site plans to show removal and replacement of the existing parallel parking spaces and existing sidewalk and reconstruct the sidewalk at a 2% cross slope to bring the finished floor elevation of the building to 5.00; 7. That, prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue; Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 11 of 1.2 0 8. That only elevator equipment or other mechanical rooms be permitted above the sixth floor; 9. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be monument-style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 10. That the applicant submit a survey when the sixth floor is constructed verifying this top living floor is less than 75 feet from the lowest fire vehicle access (street). Should this height be 75 feet or more, then a high rise fire package will be required; 11. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 13. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ?4q I,.Q- / Wayne M. ells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIMandalay 490 Gionis (T) -1.16.07 CDB - WWIMandalay 490 StaffReport.doc Community Development Board - January 16, 2007 FLD2006-10057 - Page 12 of 12 • Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wells(a)myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL r? November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %i years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section 0 0 8 MANDO ST q p m IRIS ASTER a ACACIA ST 9DMERSET D p 0 G O CAMBRIA ? D O < DLO G I € P E -¢oVU V 0 HEILWOOD O BAY AVALON O KEN DALL ba Sp NE O ? SPLANADE1 PPVM SAY PROJECT Lj SE ?p ockAwnV SW PPM SITE ??? ?cmr BAV ONT ST SKIFF pO?T? m < ? S4M MA Cp IM ? O ?pp POINT t PAPAYA ST 3 DORY PASSAGE 53 P* 6D 0 Cmlmwe BW •T o WINDWARD P SAGE sq FIRST ST 0 ? op 0 THIRD ST ¢ o ff t? -a BRIGHT WATER DR FlF7ry ST Oo BAVSIDE F Location Map Owner: Mary G Realty, Inc. case: FLD2006-10057 Site: i 490 Mandalay Avenue Property Size(Acres): 0.40 I. I PIN: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 Atlas Page: I 267A • • 'Ilk dk? , 1 ?f • • `? a j? , ;? ? L It -1 i r O a ?l 1 r' ' 47 i F ' L ??- r 1 Y- - ,f Aerial Map Owner: Mary G Realty, Inc. Case: FLD2006-10057 Site: 490 Mandalay Avenue Property Size(Acres): 0.40 PIN: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 Atlas Page: 267A 0 0 I i 5 2 I 52 i ?? ----------, , 1 I 1 I ?, r 1 501 I ?00 ? 1 FE ` 1 r ?S I HDR "" 499 pl 0 1 crib ?o f l 1 I ? I f t_ 1 .._r -------- I I 495 1 1 ? ? __? 1 7 ? j 4 j YY f li _ a 489 P Q ; i 465 ? z '483 i 480 I C1 _- I ' r 471 ~_,?- ///? I 47.614 4 u - -- 4 1 I-- ; ; T i ? 47 7 -, -- 1 J = SAN/yARCO S ?' -----' q LL4 - I T t - 71 ? ? 41 v 7 r I Q j 4166 ( ) --46-7 ---' 1 - - _ 4 W - - y -4-65 Z I' - 9 y - -- I 46 459 4 ---- j W i I 1 457 46 463 46 ----- --- -- W ` , __?_ 453 1 45311 r-- 1 1 --I I 449 L, L .. - - _ --?._-_- I - - 449 f - 1J r-r 1 7 2 443 1 - ?ry --44L I -`? 439 J r------r -r44 PAPAYA ST -- a 41'1 1 ?g^ I I -' _ -- -- I 1! 14361 1 glg1-- _-- ` ! I I I ? Zoning Map Owner. Mary G Realty, Inc. I Case: FLD2006-10057 Site: 490 Mandalay Avenue Property 0.40 Size(Acres): PIN: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 Atlas Page: 267A • 0 1 l 7 ; sa ef 1L /,? ' So, Attached t 11 $0 0 7 da#iehs 1 dwellings - nstrudt?i r is I 1 BAYMONT ST I _+ 488 1 l 485 l ngs/ ! ;463 R il Ov , Atta hedA Ret ' --"-- ' - s ac ?4 do 1 , L- _ un co ? 4 , _ i 4757' _ 4 J -- 47 SA/yMARCO ST b S. ; ,-- 11 471 467 7 ?? V 466 r1 % ?, f = ----' ail 47 I -- ', a 465 $a1e$? 45 Q 1 ---- 3 ; W 57 46 46 Attached 46 LA dwellings 4 I L4Wj r--- __ etal 448 t ' J Qit ' 449 -' ' j , es 1 al 44e 443 S da Q s 2 ( I _ --- , _fl 439 r---- -1-4d3 PAPAYA ST Overnight a 4 ; ;6 4'ar---- - accommodations ? ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Mary G Realty, Inc. Case: FLD2006-10057 Site: 490 Mandalay Avenue Property 0.40 Size(Acres) : PIN: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 Atlas Page: 267A r r. ' 0;:i _ i P 11 , , o4o ' e n 1 r. Noll W-Oft NPW 10 s f Y !?? s r ? i !1 I M6, f .' toot ?aii l S," i;:Gari T?? ton Owma"N r - IMF View looking northeast at Belle Harbor at northeast comer of Mandalay & Baymont St. FLD2006-10057 490 Mandalay Avenue View looking NW at subject property (Sandpearl att. dwell. in background; Sandpearl retail on left) ° _ ? €? ? ? r rr3 - Pd View looking SW along Mandalav Ave - subject property in middle; Sandpearl hotel on rt; Sandpear att. dw. in backgro Mandalay Beach Club on le .r-. ¦I ?- ?? _r _?? View lookiw, southeast at retail sales to the east of subject property across Mandalay Ave. Sandpearl & Mandalay Bch Club in background Sandpearl att. dwell. & hotel in background rrs.'"r' • Conditions Associated With `,ais` ry FLD2006-10057 '-'s'' i?+ 490 MANDALAY AVE r r`lY" Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 11/13/2006 The height of this building is that of a HIGH RISE BUILDING, NFPA 101,Life Safety Code 2003 Not Met edition definition : 3.3.27.7 HIGH RISE BUILDING. A building greater than 23 m ( 75 feet ) in height where the building height is measured from the lowest level of fire department vehicle access to the floor of the highest occupiable story. MUST Meet the HIGH RISE Requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 12/15/2006 Send a letter agreeing to have a survey when top floor is in place to show that level from lowest FIRE VEHICLE ACCESS (street) to floor of highest occupyable level is less than 75' If over then the high rise package will be required. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 Not Met 11/08/2006 Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4724 to calculate the assessment. Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 11/13/2006 J Prior to CDB the following conditions are to be met: Not Met 1) The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations V above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be 1 foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. 12/21/06 MET Per e-mail from Keith Zayac the finished floor elevation of the retail stores shall be raised to proposed elevation 5.00 (NAVD 88 datum) 2) The site plan is to show the proposed improvements on Baymont St. that are proposed to be done by the developer of the Sand Pearl Resort. It is recommended that the outfall pipe for this site tie into the proposed inlet on Baymont as this system will have more capacity, rather than connected to inlet on Mandalay Ave. 12/19/06 -MET Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 11/14/2006 Acknowledge that the vertical clear height of the parking garage is 82" to accommodate van Not Met accessible parking per ADA Florida Building Code Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.5. on both civil and architectural site plans. 12/19/06 - MET 2. Demonstrate that a scaled 17.5' long passenger car can exit the two south end parking spaces without hitting any objects. 12/19/06 - NOT MET 3. Walls and/or columns shall not obstruct parked motorist's visibility. 12/19/06 - ACKNOWLEDGED 4. Provide a 6' space between the off-site parallel parking spaces for better manueverability and pedestrian access. 12/19/06 - MET The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 12/04/2006 12/18/06 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval (see architect's response). CaseConditons Print Date: 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 3 41. FLD2006-10057 490 MANDALAY AVE Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 ] 12/4/06 - WW J d The dumpster room is the same size as it was under the prior proposal denied by the CDB, yet three residential units have been eliminated and 4,350 square feet of retail space has been added. Is this room big enough for the retail uses? The residential units have a trash chute to dispose of their trash from their level. Operationally, how will the retail units dispose of their trash? 11 /30/2006 /i 12/18/06 & 11 /30/06 - WW Not Met J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 11/30/2006 / f 12/18/06 & 11/30/06 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom -elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. 11/30/2006 / 12/18/06 & 11/30/06 - WW Not Met JJ Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 11/30/2006) / 12/18/06 & 11/30/06 - WW Not Met J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 11/30/2006 12/18/06 & 11 /30/06 - WW Not Met Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 11 /30/2006 12/18/06 & 11 /30/06 - WW Not Met J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a - monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 2/05/2006 f 12/18/06 - WW Not Met v Include as a condition of approval. 12/5/06 - WW Sheet A2 - Roof plan appears to indicate there is a storage room on the roof above the sixth floor. Correct? If so, definition of "height, structure or building" does not permit such. Advise/revise. 1 5/2006 12/18/06 - WW Not Met Recommend the electric meters and panels be shielded from view somehow, as it doesn't give the eastern unit a great view, plus it will be viewable from the second floor across the street. Recommend screening prior to the issuance of the building permit. 12/5/06 - WW Show or state location of electric meters. If within a room next to elevator, indicate on the floor plans the location. If exterior to the building, show location. 11/30/2006 f 12/18/06 & 11/30/06 - WW Not Met V Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Print Date: 01/10/2007 CaseConditons Page 2 of 3 FLD2006-10057 490 MANDALAY AVE Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 11/30/2006 ( J 12/18/06&111/30/06-WW Not Met J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 11 /30/2006 / j 12/18/06 & 11/30/06 - WW Not Met J Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; Print Date: 01/10/2007 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 6:30 PM To: Rice, Scott; Doherty, Steve Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Scott/Steve - I have sent emails to Keith Zayac today informing him of items that need to be addressed to keep on track to the January 16, 2007, CDB agenda and those items of more of a minor nature that won't hold up placing the request on that agenda but still need to be revised on the plans prior to being sent to the CDB. While looking at all comments in Permit Plan, I found that the following comment has been marked "met", yet it contains requirements to be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit and prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. In marking this comment "met" I do not catch these comments to place into the Staff Report and as conditions of approval for the CDB. What would help me for not only this project, but for all such similar cases (whether FLS or FLD), is to uncheck the "met" so that it will print when I ask for all "not met" comments. This way I can make sure these comments are not forgotten or "lost" and are properly dealt with in the Staff Report and Development Order. Thanks. "Prior to review by CDB: 1. Complete notes 13 and 14, page 4/6. 12/19/06 - MET Prior to issuance of a building permit: 12/19/06 - ACKNOWLEDGED 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Applicant shall pay applicable sewer and water impact fees. 3. Provide a note or indicate on the plan that fire hydrant assembly will be located no further than 40-feet from a Fire Department Connection (FDC). Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: 1. Applicant shall grant to the City of Clearwater an easement over all unrestricted water lines to be located on private property. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. 3. The City of Clearwater will install parking meters adjacent to all public parking spaces on Mandalay Avenue. Applicant will coordinate construction efforts with the City's Parking Facilities Manager to have all existing parking meters relocated as necessary and to provide meters for new public parking spaces. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application." Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:48 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Doherty, Steve Subject: RE: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue There are two issues that could keep this project off the CDB agenda: Stormwater The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations 1' above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be 1 foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. 12/19/06 - NOT MET Traffic Demonstrate that a scaled 17.5' long passenger car can exit the two south end parking spaces without hitting any objects. 12/19/06 - NOT MET The stormwater issue is critical and must be addressed prior to CDB. The traffic issue does not affect our ROW and is not critical. D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director 727-562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:18 PM To: Doherty, Steve Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FLD2006-10057, 490 Mandalay Avenue Steve/Scott - There are a number of conditions still outstanding from the Engineering Department for this project. Do you think these will hold up this project being placed on the 1/16/07 CDB meeting agenda? If not, I still have some things that need to be changed on the plans before the package is sent to the CDB, so your items can also be revised as needed in this circumstance. Let me know, as I have to get this over to the clerk's office Tuesday afternoon. Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 10:35 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members Cc: Sullivan, Robert "Scott" Subject: RE: RESUBMITTALS FOR THE CDB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 635 Mandalay-No Issues. 300 Hamden-No Issues. 205 Belcher-Scott Sullivan needs to review this case. 19135 US 19-Updated conditions. 1202 Sunset-No Issues. 490 Mandalay-No Issues. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:01 PM To: DRC Members Subject: FW: RESUBMITTALS FOR THE CDB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 Importance: High 7. FLD2006-10057 490 MANDALAY AVE PLANNER: WAYNE WELLS SO SORRY I FORGOT THIS IN MY EMAIL A FEW MINUTES AGO. Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 shemj.watkins@mycleanvater.com -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:38 PM To: DRC Members Subject: RESUBMITTALS FOR THE CDB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 16, 2007, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2006-09053 635 Mandalay Avenue 2. FLD2006-10054 300 Hamden Drive 3. FLD2006-10058 205 N Belcher Road 4. FLD2006-09052 19135 US 19 5. FLD2006-10058 205 N Belcher Road 6.FLD2006-06038 1202 Sunset Dr Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner John Schoditer Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner John Schoditer I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12 :00 pm on Tuesday, December 19, 2006. THANK YOU, Shemj L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins @myclearwater. coin Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:38 PM To: DRC Members Subject: RESUBMITTALS FOR THE CDB ON JANUARY 16, 2007 Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the January 16, 2007, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2006-09053 635 Mandalay Avenue 2. FLD2006-10054 300 Hamden Drive 3. FLD2006-10058 205 N Belcher Road 4. FLD2006-09052 19135 US 19 5. FLD2006-10058 205 N Belcher Road 6.FLD2006-06038 1202 Sunset Dr Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner John Schodlter Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner John Schodlter I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12 :00 pm on Tuesday, December 19, 2006. THANK YOU, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 shemj.watkins@myclear7vater.com • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:04 AM To: E. D. Armstrong Esquire (E-mail) Subject: Gionis draft 12.7.06 dre action agend... j , r Case Number: FLD2006-100 490 MANDALAY AVE Pew) 1:15 pm Owner(s): Mary G Realty Inc ' ? • ?? 490 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, F133767 O TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, F134695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keitbzayac.com Location: 0.40 acres located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a sight visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller Applicant: Keith Zayac, Nick Gionis, Jason Medeiros The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 23 1 . Prior to review by B: 1. Complete notes 13 and 14, page 4/6. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room` #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Applicant shall pay applicable sewer and water impact fees. 3. Provide a note or indicate on the plan that fire hydrant assembly will be located no further than 40-feet from a Fire Department Connection (FDC). Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: 1. Applicant shall grant to the City of Clearwater an easement over all unrestricted water lines to be located on private property. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. 3. The City of Clearwater will install parking meters adjacent to all public parking spaces on Mandalay Avenue. Applicant will coordinate construction efforts with the City's Parking Facilites Manager to have all existing parking meters relocated as necessary and to provide meters for new public parking spaces. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues Fire: I . Utility Plan page 4 # 13 and # 14 are incomplete. Shall ? and Must ? Please finish the verbage to these statements. PRIOR TO CDB 2. Utility Plan shows the Fire Hydrant to be used for the Fire Department Connection on page 4 of 6. Show the location of second Fire Hydrant for fire fighting within 300 feet of building. PRIOR TO CDB 3 . The height of this building is that of a HIGH RISE BUILDING, NFPA 101,Life Safety Code 2003 edition definition : 3.3.27.7 HIGH RISE BUILDING. A building greater than 23 in ( 75 feet ) in height where the building height is measured from the lowest level of fire department vehicle access to the floor of the highest occupiable story. MUST Meet the HIGH RISE Requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Must meet Ordinance NO. 7617-06--Radio System Regulations for Buildings.Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 24 1 . Sheet 5 of 6 - Othean the one crape myrtle tree east of the elevatoi, recommend some groundcover or shrubs to fill out this area. 2. Sheet 5 of 6 - With only 5.5 feet available for landscape treatment along the west side, suggest filling this area out with shrubs/groundcover rather than sod. 3. Sheet 5 of 6 - Will sod be planted in all areas not shown to receive trees, shrubs or groundcover? If so, state on plan. 4. Sheet 5 of 6 - Crape myrtles need to be two-inch caliper. 5 . Sheet 5 of 6 - Sand cordgrass has been shown to cover the entire northern retention pond, including the bottom. This groundcover is drought tolerant, good for xeriscaping. Will it survive in wet conditions? Unclear why some type of similar landscaping is not proposed for at least a portion of the southern retention pond. 6. Due to the request to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program, providing alternative landscape measures to meet the requirements of the Code or reasons why the elimination is necessary. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4724 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to CDB the following conditions are to be met: 1) The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations 1' above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be 1 foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. 2) The site plan is to show the proposed improvements on Baymont St. that are proposed to be done by the developer of the Sand Pearl Resort. It is recommended that the outfall pipe for this site tie into the proposed inlet on Baymont as this system will have more capacity, rather than connected to inlet on Mandalay Ave. Solid Waste: I . No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . Acknowledge that the vertical clear height of the parking garage is 87' to accommodate van accessible parking per ADA Florida Building Code Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.5. on both civil and architectural site plans. 2. Demonstrate that a scaled 17.5' long passenger car can exit the two south end parking spaces without hitting any objects. 3. Walls and/or columns shall not obstruct parked motorist's visibility. 4. Provide a 6' space between the off-site parallel parking spaces for better manueverability and pedestrian access. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 25 1 . Potential condition o approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 5 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. Sheet 3 - Revise the proposed height to 82'-5". 11 . The dumpster room is the same size as it was under the prior proposal denied by the CDB, yet three residential units have been eliminated and 4,350 square feet of retail space has been added. Is this room big enough for the retail uses? The residential units have a trash chute to dispose of their trash from their level. Operationally, how will the retail units dispose of their trash? 12. If a commercial unit needs to install a grease trap, where will such be installed, since the sanitary sewer line exits the building on the north side through the retention pond? 13. Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Remove the curb on the east side of the trash staging area in order to get dumpster(s) into the trash staging area. 14. Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Place a radius (not a 90-degree angle) at the corner of the northern parking space and the drive aisle for better maneuvering ability for a vehicle to access this northernmost space. 15. Southwestern stairwell - Building/Fire Codes will require a sidewalk from the exit door to a public way within the right-of-way. Show how this is being accomplished on all civil and landscape plans (minimum 44-inches wide). 16. Architectural plans indicate that a/c units will be on top of the residential tower. Will this include the retail units, or will their a/c units be on their roof? 17. Sheet A-1 - Will the eastern unit on the first floor have full use of the roof of the retail units as a terrace or will it be restricted to only certain areas? If restricted, indicate such on the plans. 18. Colors on Sheet A-3 are inconsistent with the reduced 8.5"x11" colored elevations. Ensure written colors on Sheet A-3 have arrows to the appropriate areas, are the correct color and are sufficient to indicate the color scheme of the building. 19. Civil plans - Need to show the covered entry at the southeast comer of the building. 20. Show or state location of electric meters. If within a room next to elevator, indicate on the floor plans the location. If exterior to the building, show location. 21 . Sheet A2 - Roof plan appears to indicate there is a storage room on the roof above the sixth floor. Correct? If so, defmition of "height, structure or building" does not permit such. Advise/revise. 22. Need to include on Sheet 3 of 6 the mixed use calculation (being provided to you via email). 23 . Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise Total Required Parking to 40 spaces (not 31). 24. Sheet 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Some columns are shown as white, some are black. Be consistent (prefer black). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 26 25 . Sheet A3 - Providemished floor elevation for first floor. It would a so be extremely helpful to have the finished floor elevation for all floors and the flat roof deck for the a/c units. 26. Sheet A3 - On the west elevation there is a stucco band at the bottom of the building on the south side. Is this band intended only at this location, or is it intended along all other elevations. Seems strange only at this one location. Revise elevations appropriately. 27. Ground-level retail will be required to be floodproofed. With this design, ensure final design will incorporated floodproofing measures. If such design needs to change to accommodate floodproofing, show such change now. 28. Duron Smokey Topaz may be a little too dark. Revise to a lighter shade. 29. Attachment D to the application indicates in "e" (last paragraph) that parking is screened from street view. This is true on the east side, but what is happening on the north side? The plans (nor written material) do not indicate how this is being addressed. Revise plans and written material. 30. Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines (much like was done on the prior application), including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). 31 . Stem walls are proposed for the vertical portions of the retention ponds (north and south). What is being constructed on top of the stem wall for safety (wall, railing, etc.)? Is there any design of this decided yet? If so, provide/show. Additionally, there is no cross section of either pond. What is the slope of the ponds and will there be any fencing of these ponds required? If so, show. 32. Sheet 3 of 6 - Unclear of note on west side "concrete flum" (?). Advise/revise. 33 . Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise arrow for "straight curb" note on the west side to the appropriate location. 34. Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise arrow for "(2) 20'x20' sight visibility triangle (typ)" to the appropriate location. 35 . Per Building Code, the floor plan for the 5th & 6th level is correct showing two stairwells. Revise the West, North and South Elevations on Sheet A3 to show the second stairwell in the southwest comer of the building with the access walkway to the stairwell (shown correctly on prior proposal). 36. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #1 - Response says that the parking "is within an enclosed parking garage which is designed to be perceived as an extension of the residential units above." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 37. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #4 - Response needs to reference the parking demand study for the reduction of required parking. 38 . Attachment D - Criteria #la - Response says in the first sentence the increase to height is from 30 feet. In the Tourist District, this height is 35 feet. Revise. 39. Attachment D - Criteria #lb - Response states the parking is "enclosed and located behind the retail shops." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 40. Attachment D - Criteria #Ie - Response states the parking "is screened by the first floor building walls from street view." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 41. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - a. Revise response in third sentence from "25" feet to "35" feet. b. You need to state that you are requesting setback reductions (to the front [east and north] and to the side [west]). Need to reference that Beach by Design desires/mandates the building at a zero front setback to Mandalay Avenue. 42. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - It is noted that the project will not be "self contained" as the total required off-street parking is not being provided on-site. 43 . Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Unclear as to meaning of the next to last sentence. You say this project "exceeds" the setbacks of the Sandpearl project on the east. They were approved at a zero setback on the east, just as you are requesting. 44. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6b - This is referring to the Beach by Design Guidelines. Provide appropriate response. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 27 45. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria c - First sentence of the second paragraph - Response states the parking "is screened by the first floor building walls from street view." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 46. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6d - Expand on the response, especially in terms of changes in horizontal building planes, use of architectural details, variety in materials, colors and textures, distinctive fenestration patterns and distinctive roof forms. 47, Sheet 3 of 6 - Confirm that the proposed vehicular area listed is for that part of the pavement not under the building (meaning, you don't need to count that pavement under the building as vehicular use area, since you cannot plant landscaping under the building). 48. Sheet A3 - Provide a dimension on the north elevation as to the vertical height of the building over the drive aisle. 49. Sheet A3 - It appears appropriate design to replicate the rusticated stucco areas shown on the south side of the stair towers also on the west stair tower. 50. Sheet A3 - a. Unclear why rusticated stucco is proposed on only the western dwelling unit facade on the first level, rather than just stippled stucco. b. Unclear why stippled stucco is not shown in all locations on all elevations, except where rusticated stucco is indicated. c. West Elevation - Show the lines of the eastern stairtower on Levels 4 and 5 (just like Level 6). d. North and West Elevations - Unclear why the rusticated stucco is not continued on the ground level onto the north and west elevations. e. South Elevation - Rusticated stucco location and height on the stairtowers should be consistent (seeing as the western stairtower needs to extend up to the sixth level). 51 . Sheet Al - a. First, Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the dining room projects from the main face of the building on the west side. b. Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the balconies in the bedrooms projects from the wall and the kitchen projects from the main face of the building on the east side. c. First, Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the building indents from the eastern edge of the elevator to the open walkway area and the distance from the eastern wall of bedroom #3 to the open walkway area. d. First Level - It appears an extra column has been added to the balcony for the eastern unit. 52. Sheet A2 - a. Fourth Level - Provide the dimension for the distance the gazebo by the pool projects from the main face of the building on the west side. b. Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the balconies in the bedrooms projects from the wall and the kitchen projects from the main face of the building on the east side. c. Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the building indents from the eastern edge of the elevator to the open walkway area and the distance from the eastern wall of bedroom #3 to the open walkway area. d. Fifth & Sixth Levels - It appears that columns north of Stairwell #2 need to be shown on the western side. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 28 53 . Sheet A3 - Based on the floor plans on Sheets Al and A2: a. North Elevation - On the west side of the eastern unit, the column should be solid (structural), not a double decorative column. b. West Elevation - On the left hand side (for the eastern unit), the balcony column should look like that on the East Elevation, not a double decorative column. c. North Elevation - For both the eastern and western units, there is a middle column shown on the balcony that the floor plan doesn't show. d. South Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. e. West Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation for the balconies for the First, Second & Third Levels, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. f. East Elevation - On the floor plans for all Levels, the design for the balconies for bedrooms 2 & 3 for the eastern units are shown similar to that for the balconies for the master bedroom for the western units. Based on the western elevation for these balconies, is it the intention to have the eastern balconies in these bedrooms look like the west side? West side elevation looks nicer. 54. Sheet A2 - Pool must be handicap accessible. Will you be installing a lift? Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 1/16/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 12/14/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 29 1:15 pm Case Number: FLD2006-10057 - 490 MANDALAY AVE Owner(s): Mary G Realty Inc 490 Mandalay Ave • • Clearwater, F133767 Vogt TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: 0.40 acres located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller, Tom Glenn Applicant: Keith Zayac, Jerry Figurski, Clem Papas The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 32 Prior to review by It: 0 1. Complete notes 13 and 14, page 4/6. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Applicant shall pay applicable sewer and water impact fees. 3. Provide a note or indicate on the plan that fire hydrant assembly will be located no further than 40-feet from a Fire Department Connection (FDC). Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: 1. Applicant shall grant to the City of Clearwater an easement over all unrestricted water lines to be located on private property. 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. 3. The City of Clearwater will install parking meters adjacent to all public parking spaces on Mandalay Avenue. Applicant will coordinate construction efforts with the City's Parking Facilites Manager to have all existing parking meters relocated as necessary and to provide meters for new public parking spaces. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: I , Utility Plan page 4 # 13 and # 14 are incomplete. Shall ? and Must ? Please finish the verbage to these statements. PRIOR TO CDB 2. Utility Plan shows the Fire Hydrant to be used for the Fire Department Connection on page 4 of 6. Show the location of second Fire Hydrant for fire fighting within 300 feet of building. PRIOR TO CDB 3 . The height of this building is that of a HIGH RISE BUILDING, NFPA 101,Life Safety Code 2003 edition defmition : 3.3.27.7 HIGH RISE BUILDING. A building greater than 23 m ( 75 feet ) in height where the building height is measured from the lowest level of fire department vehicle access to the floor of the highest occupiable story. MUST Meet the HIGH RISE Requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Must meet Ordinance NO. 7617-06--Radio System Regulations for Buildings.Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: I . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: I . No Issues. Landscaping: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 33 1 . Sheet 5 of 6 - Oth• an the one crape myrtle tree east of the elevatoecommend some groundcover or shrubs to fill out this area. 2. Sheet 5 of 6 - With only 5.5 feet available for landscape treatment along the west side, suggest filling this area out with shrubs/groundcover rather than sod. 3 . Sheet 5 of 6 - Will sod be planted in all areas not shown to receive trees, shrubs or groundcover? If so, state on plan. 4. Sheet 5 of 6 - Crape myrtles need to be two-inch caliper. 5 . Sheet 5 of 6 - Sand cordgrass has been shown to cover the entire northern retention pond, including the bottom. This groundcover is drought tolerant, good for xeriscaping. Will it survive in wet conditions? Unclear why some type of similar landscaping is not proposed for at least a portion of the southern retention pond. 6. Due to the request to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, need to submit a Comprehensive Landscape Program, providing alternative landscape measures to meet the requirements of the Code or reasons why the elimination is necessary. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4724 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: I . Prior to CDB the following conditions are to be met: 1) The City requirement is to have finished floor elevations 1' above the crown of the adjacent road. It appears that the proposed floor elevation is at or near the crown of the road. The proposed retail floor elevation is proposed to be elevation 4.5. If the proposed floor cannot be 1 foot above the adjacent road then the site engineer is to demonstrate that the retail shops will not flood in a 100 year storm event based on the existing gutter and crown elevation of the adjacent street network out to the intercoastal waterway. 2) The site plan is to show the proposed improvements on Baymont St. that are proposed to be done by the developer of the Sand Pearl Resort. It is recommended that the outfall pipe for this site tie into the proposed inlet on Baymont as this system will have more capacity, rather than connected to inlet on Mandalay Ave. Solid Waste: I . No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . Acknowledge that the vertical clear height of the parking garage is 87' to accommodate van accessible parking per ADA Florida Building Code Chapter 11, Section 11-4.6.5. on both civil and architectural site plans. 2. Demonstrate that a scaled 17.5' long passenger car can exit the two south end parking spaces without hitting any objects. 3. Walls and/or columns shall not obstruct parked motorist's visibility. 4. Provide a 6' space between the off-site parallel parking spaces for better manueverability and pedestrian access. The above to be addressed prior to a Community Development Board (CDB) hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 34 1 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 5 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 7. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 8 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 10. Sheet 3 - Revise the proposed height to 82'-5". 11 . The dumpster room is the same size as it was under the prior proposal denied by the CDB, yet three residential units have been eliminated and 4,350 square feet of retail space has been added. Is this room big enough for the retail uses? The residential units have a trash chute to dispose of their trash from their level. Operationally, how will the retail units dispose of their trash? 12. If a commercial unit needs to install a grease trap, where will such be installed, since the sanitary sewer line exits the building on the north side through the retention pond? 13 . Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Remove the curb on the east side of the trash staging area in order to get dumpster(s) into the trash staging area. 14. Sheets 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Place a radius (not a 90-degree angle) at the corner of the northern parking space and the drive aisle for better maneuvering ability for a vehicle to access this northernmost space. 15. Southwestern stairwell - Building/Fire Codes will require a sidewalk from the exit door to a public way within the right-of-way. Show how this is being accomplished on all civil and landscape plans (minimum 44-inches wide). 16. Architectural plans indicate that a/c units will be on top of the residential tower. Will this include the retail units, or will their a/c units be on their roof? 17. Sheet A-1 - Will the eastern unit on the first floor have full use of the roof of the retail units as a terrace or will it be restricted to only certain areas? If restricted, indicate such on the plans. 18. Colors on Sheet A-3 are inconsistent with the reduced 8.5"x11" colored elevations. Ensure written colors on Sheet A-3 have arrows to the appropriate areas, are the correct color and are sufficient to indicate the color scheme of the building. 19. Civil plans - Need to show the covered entry at the southeast corner of the building. 20. Show or state location of electric meters. If within a room next to elevator, indicate on the floor plans the location. If exterior to the building, show location. 21 . Sheet A2 - Roof plan appears to indicate there is a storage room on the roof above the sixth floor. Correct? If so, definition of "height, structure or building" does not permit such. Advise/revise. 22. Need to include on Sheet 3 of 6 the mixed use calculation (being provided to you via email). 23 . Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise Total Required Parking to 40 spaces (not 31). 24. Sheet 3, 4 and 5 of 6 - Some columns are shown as white, some are black. Be consistent (prefer black). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 35 25 . Sheet A3 - Provide P shed floor elevation for first floor. It would Also extremely helpful to have the fmished floor elevation for all floors and the flat roof deck for the a/c units. 26. Sheet A3 - On the west elevation there is a stucco band at the bottom of the building on the south side. Is this band intended only at this location, or is it intended along all other elevations. Seems strange only at this one location. Revise elevations appropriately. 27. Ground-level retail will be required to be floodproofed. With this design, ensure final design will incorporated floodproofmg measures. If such design needs to change to accommodate floodproofmg, show such change now. 28 . Duron Smokey Topaz may be a little too dark. Revise to a lighter shade. 29. Attachment D to the application indicates in "e" (last paragraph) that parking is screened from street view. This is true on the east side, but what is happening on the north side? The plans (nor written material) do not indicate how this is being addressed. Revise plans and written material. 30. Provide a written analysis of how this proposal meets Beach by Design Guidelines (much like was done on the prior application), including an analysis of area of openings and ornamentation (C.3 on Page 60 of Beach by Design). 31 . Stem walls are proposed for the vertical portions of the retention ponds (north and south). What is being constructed on top of the stem wall for safety (wall, railing, etc.)? Is there any design of this decided yet? If so, provide/show. Additionally, there is no cross section of either pond. What is the slope of the ponds and will there be any fencing of these ponds required? If so, show. 32. Sheet 3 of 6 - Unclear of note on west side "concrete flum" (?). Advise/revise. 33 . Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise arrow for "straight curb" note on the west side to the appropriate location. 34. Sheet 3 of 6 - Revise arrow for "(2) 20'x20' sight visibility triangle (typ)" to the appropriate location. 35 . Per Building Code, the floor plan for the 5th & 6th level is correct showing two stairwells. Revise the West, North and South Elevations on Sheet A3 to show the second stairwell in the southwest corner of the building with the access walkway to the stairwell (shown correctly on prior proposal). 36. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #1 - Response says that the parking "is within an enclosed parking garage which is designed to be perceived as an extension of the residential units above." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 37. Attachment C - General Applicability criteria #4 - Response needs to reference the parking demand study for the reduction of required parking. 38 . Attachment D - Criteria # I a - Response says in the first sentence the increase to height is from 30 feet. In the Tourist District, this height is 35 feet. Revise. 39. Attachment D - Criteria #lb - Response states the parking is "enclosed and located behind the retail shops." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 40. Attachment D - Criteria #1e - Response states the parking "is screened by the first floor building walls from street view." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 41 . Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - a. Revise response in third sentence from "25" feet to "35" feet. b. You need to state that you are requesting setback reductions (to the front [east and north] and to the side [west]). Need to reference that Beach by Design desires/mandates the building at a zero front setback to Mandalay Avenue. 42. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #3 - It is noted that the project will not be "self contained" as the total required off-street parking is not being provided on-site. 43. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Unclear as to meaning of the next to last sentence. You say this project "exceeds" the setbacks of the Sandpearl project on the east. They were approved at a zero setback on the east, just as you are requesting. 44. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6b - This is referring to the Beach by Design Guidelines. Provide appropriate response. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 36 45 . Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria Vc - First sentence of the second paragraph - Response states the parking "is screened by the first floor building walls from street view." Reality is not the case as written. Parking extends beyond the building envelop on the west and on the north. See other comment regarding screening of parking from Baymont Street. Revise response. 46. Attachment E - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6d - Expand on the response, especially in terms of changes in horizontal building planes, use of architectural details, variety in materials, colors and textures, distinctive fenestration patterns and distinctive roof forms. 47. Sheet 3 of 6 - Confirm that the proposed vehicular area listed is for that part of the pavement not under the building (meaning, you don't need to count that pavement under the building as vehicular use area, since you cannot plant landscaping under the building). 48. Sheet A3 - Provide a dimension on the north elevation as to the vertical height of the building over the drive aisle. 49. Sheet A3 - It appears appropriate design to replicate the rusticated stucco areas shown on the south side of the stair towers also on the west stair tower. 50. Sheet A3 - a. Unclear why rusticated stucco is proposed on only the western dwelling unit facade on the first level, rather than just stippled stucco. b. Unclear why stippled stucco is not shown in all locations on all elevations, except where rusticated stucco is indicated. c. West Elevation - Show the lines of the eastern stairtower on Levels 4 and 5 (just like Level 6). d. North and West Elevations - Unclear why the rusticated stucco is not continued on the ground level onto the north and west elevations. e. South Elevation - Rusticated stucco location and height on the stairtowers should be consistent (seeing as the western stairtower needs to extend up to the sixth level). 51 . Sheet Al - a. First, Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the dining room projects from the main face of the building on the west side. b. Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the balconies in the bedrooms projects from the wall and the kitchen projects from the main face of the building on the east side. c. First, Second & Third Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the building indents from the eastern edge of the elevator to the open walkway area and the distance from the eastern wall of bedroom #3 to the open walkway area. d. First Level - It appears an extra column has been added to the balcony for the eastern unit. 52. Sheet A2 - a. Fourth Level - Provide the dimension for the distance the gazebo by the pool projects from the main face of the building on the west side. b. Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the balconies in the bedrooms projects from the wall and the kitchen projects from the main face of the building on the east side. c. Fourth, Fifth & Sixth Levels - Provide the dimension for the distance the building indents from the eastern edge of the elevator to the open walkway area and the distance from the eastern wall of bedroom #3 to the open walkway area. d. Fifth & Sixth Levels - It appears that columns north of Stairwell #2 need to be shown on the western side. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 37 53 . Sheet A3 - Based Ithe floor plans on Sheets Al and A2: • a. North Elevation - On the west side of the eastern unit, the column should be solid (structural), not a double decorative column. b. West Elevation - On the left hand side (for the eastern unit), the balcony column should look like that on the East Elevation, not a double decorative column. c. North Elevation - For both the eastern and western units, there is a middle column shown on the balcony that the floor plan doesn't show. d. South Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. e. West Elevation - There is a double decorative column shown on the elevation for the balconies for the First, Second & Third Levels, but the floor plans show a solid column. If you want the double decorative column, change the floor plans. f East Elevation - On the floor plans for all Levels, the design for the balconies for bedrooms 2 & 3 for the eastern units are shown similar to that for the balconies for the master bedroom for the western units. Based on the western elevation for these balconies, is it the intention to have the eastern balconies in these bedrooms look like the west side? West side elevation looks nicer. 54. Sheet A2 - Pool must be handicap accessible. Will you be installing a lift? Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 1/16/07 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 12/14/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, December 7, 2006 - Page 38 Message 9 46 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:51 PM To: 'Gina L. Canopari' Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Elliott, Gayle Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Gina - I am, with this email, forwarding your request to Sherry Watkins regarding your request for copies of the application material. Sherry will contact you with the information as to cost, time, etc. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Gina L. Canopari [mailto:ginac@jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 1:49 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 490 Mandalay Hi Wayne, sorry we didn't make it over on Halloween. I had a closing here that went haywire, and had to even change out of my costume for it in the afternoon! Ed Armstrong asked me to get with you on 490 Mandalay. I understand Gionis has refiled an application, and Ed would like me to get from you 2 copies of any plans that were filed. Is that something I can come by to pick up at some point? Gina L. Canopari, Paralegal Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 727-441-8617 Fax 11/7/2006 t; r ' P'ii f as County Property App of r Information: 08 29 15 16398 000 0 Page 2 of 5 08 1 29 / 15 / 15398 1 000 1 0570 19-Nov-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:03:01 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales MARY 0 REALTY INC OBK: 05685 OPG: 0837 490 MANDALAY AUE CLEARWATER FL 33767-2007 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 490 MANDALAY AUE of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.0 2 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book/P age Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 1211,983 5,6681 223 226,900 (U) I 1925: Book 010 Pgs 042- 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 1,600,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 1,600,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,600,000 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 34,822.40 1) 175 x 100 100. 00 1.7, 500. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 34, 822.40 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 34,822.40 Short Legal CLEARWATER BEACH PARK LOTS 57,58,59,60,61,62 AND Description 63 & N 10.25FT OF LOT 64 Building Information http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 11/19/2006 r t Pin1 as County Property App er Information: 08 29 15 16398 000 0 Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 08 / 29 / 18 / 18398 / 000 / 0570 :01 19-Nov-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 19:03:01 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Shopping Center Property Address: 490 MANDALAY AUE Prop Use: 321 Land Use: 11 structural E1rE:mrunts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Prestress Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 24 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,984 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 sub Aroas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 6,958 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .20 722 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .25 392 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Fsatures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 8000 1.75 8,000 14,000 14,000 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 14,000 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) [-*] [411, 1+1 T Fq Pq http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 11/19/2006 r Pin'Ilas County Property App ' er Information: 08 29 15 16398 000 0 Page 4 of 5 1172() -3201 rSC?l BAYM NT SAIV 56 46 , 21P TI. filANPAL 4- N AY 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 11/19/2006 PHAttas County Property Appoer Information: 08 29 15 16398 000 00 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Pasze An explanation of this screen http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 11/19/2006 FLD2*10057: 356 222 E 13TH STRI =_ ; -CORP 44 EILEEN AVE PLAINVIEW NY 11803 - 5203 808 MANDALAY LLC 2429 N FAIRFAX DR ARLINGTON VA 22201 - 2712 ABOOD, ROBERT G ABOOD, CATHERINE C 2256 MACKENZIE CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2241 AGAMI, DAVID ROMANO, IVETTE NANCY 11 SAN MARCO # 1502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 ALONSO,ARMANDO ALONSO,SHARON 36007 LAKE UNITY NURSERY RD FRUITLAND PARK FL 34731 - 5816 ANGELOCCI, RANDY CROSSLAND, RICHARD 10 PAPAYA ST # 1106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 AUGUSTINE, RICHARD J 10 PAPAYA ST #506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 B J E INC 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 BARRETT, WILLIAM T BARRETT, SHEILA M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 BAUER, CHARLES L PROP LTD 6106 WADE ST LEESBURG FL 34748 - 8099 ABRAHAM, DAVID 11 SAN MARCO ST # 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 AJAY ENDEAVORS INC 12190 CONTEL BLVD BROOKVILLE FL 34613 - ALTNER, MARTIN L ALTNER, JANIS C 212 WATER VIEW CT SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2061 ARRINGTON, WILLIAM H 501 MANDALAY AVE # 910 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 AVERY, JOSEPHINE ULINE, BRADLEY R 521 MANDALAY AVE # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 BADIE, BADIE A ?32 BRAELOCH WAY MONROE CT 06468 - 3013 BARYLAK, EDWARD J BARYLAK, CHRYSTINA 3132 BRANCH RIVER RD MANITOWOC WI 54220 - 8717 BAUER, CHARLES L BAUER, JANET W 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 ?wCoo') A W BEACH PROPS--'IES LLC 10 PAPAYA # 12024 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 ACHARYA, RAVINDRA P ACHARYA, KALPANA R 47 SAWMILL RD DUDLEY MA 01571 - 5849 ALIDINA, ARIF A ALIDINA, NOORA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 ANDERSEN, LARRY E 2156 BASSWOOD DR LAFAYETTE HILL PA 19444 - 2328 ATKINS, J MICHAEL ATKINS, TERESA K 1613 ELM SHORE DR PORT BYRON IL 61275 - 9092 AXEL, JONATHAN P THE AXEL, CORAL S THE 11 SAN MARCO ST APT 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 BAKER, BARRY J BAKER, ANN F 1435 STEVENSON DR LIBERTYVILLE IL 60048 - 2572 BASORE, GREGORY R 1067 WOODWIND TRL HASLETT MI 48840 - 8977 BAYER, DAVID L BAYER, PAMELA R 710 DUNSCORE CT ROSWELL GA 30075 - 6812 BEHESHTI, ALI BELLE HARBOR LLC BELLE HARBOR OWNERS ASSN INC BEHESHTI, TARANEH 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 501 MANDALAY AVE 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1402 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 0 9 BERG, ANNA JACOBSEN BERGER, RALPH F LIVING TRUST BICZ, DANIEL S 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1409 7131 ASHVILLE PARK DR BICZ, MARGARET C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 COLUMBUS OH 43235 - 5013 521 MANDALAY AVE # 802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 BIENSTOCK, JOSEPH S BODUCH, RAYMOND T BOMERGER, DAVID RICHARD BIENSTOCK, PHYLLIS BODUCH, LINDA C 990 W OAK ST 10 PAPAYA ST # 701 521 MANDALAY AVE # 303 ZIONSVILLE IN 46077 - 1209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 BOND, GEORGE L JR BONI, JOAN P BOTWICK, ANDREW L BOND, YVONNE N 19 ROCKAWAY ST # 4 BOTWICK, DIANNE S 1215 CAMINO CAPISTRANO CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1739 1422 NW 111TH AVE ROSEVILLE CA 95747 - 6727 CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 - 6448 BOULTON, CARLOS A BRENNAN, JAMES M BROMBOZ, JONATHAN BOULTON, ANN-MARIE OTT, KARYN L BROMBOZ, VICKI 211 WOODLAKE WYNDE 4505 W DALE AVE 11 SAN MARCO ST # 304 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2174 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 BROWN, SHERMAN D BURGESS, PATRICIA M C & M 27 CO LLC BROWN, ANDREA D GRIMM, THOMAS L 136 HARBOR DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 705 3234 N 7TH ST PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 WAUSAU WI 54403 - 3007 CAMBAS, NICHOLAS A CASCIOLA, GENE M CASO, RONALD 2939 ELYSIUM WAY CASCIOLA, SHEILA CASO, BERNADETTE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1414 7000 WEDDINGTON BROOK DR 3 SUTPHIN AVE WEDDINGTON NC 28104 - 7274 MATAWAN NJ 07747 - 3315 CHACONAS, ANGELINE CHALAVARYA, GOPAL CHASE, CHRISTIAN W 6 S MYRTLE AVE CHALAVARYA, SADHNA BAILEY, MATHEW S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5518 1510 JASMINE AVE 505 MANDALAY AVE # 71 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 5242 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1718 CHASE, WALTER W CHRISTOLINI, CHARLES JR CHRISTOPHER, TODD C CHASE, JUDITH A CHRISTOLINI, DARLENE E CHRISTOPHER, WANDA 11 SAN MARCO ST 1759 MOREY RD 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2066 SHELDON VT 05483 - 8343 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 CHRISTOPHER, TODD CIOCIA, JAMES CLARK, ROBERT B CHRISTOPHER, WANDA CIOCIA, TRACY CLARK, SANDRA H 3743 PRESIDENTIAL DR 187-11 PEPPER PIKE 13201 CLAYTON RD PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 1075 LUTZ FL 33558 - 5315 ST LOUIS MO 63131 - 1002 CLARK, TERRY M CLASSON, STEPHEN J CLEARWATER REAL ESTATE HLDGS CLARK, JANE H CLASSON, KAREN L PO BOX 14184 16756 WHITES STORE RD 801 HERITAGE RD STE A TAMPA FL 33690 - 4184 BOYDS MD 20841 - 9673 DEPERE WI 54115 - 3292 COLLETTE, JAMES A COLLINS, WALTER W COLTER, GEORGE VALISE, ROBERT W 9813 COMPASS POINT WAY COLTER, HELEN 10 PAPAYA ST # 806 TAMPA FL 33615 - 4218 521 MANDALAY AVE # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 COLTON, JAMES A COMPTON VACATION HOME COOKE FAMILY REV TRUST COLTON, LORI B REVOCABL 12 GAGE GIRLS RD 421 HAMPTON GREEN COMPTON, VICKI L THE BEDFORD NH 03110 - 4704 PEACHTREE CITY GA 30269 - 2712 5712 SANDALFOOT CIR PLANO TX 75093 - 2912 CORDEIRO, JACK CORE, CHRIS W COSTAWAY LLC CORDEIRO, ALDA 124 CHARTWELL 15 HEATH WAY 8209 W CRENSHAW ST BEACONSFIELD QC H9W 1C3 00030 BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 9513 TAMPA FL 33615 - 2118 - CANADA COSTELLO, JAMES COULTER, WAYNE R COX, THOMAS D COSTELLO, JENNY L COULTER, PAMELA W COX, SHARON K 19103 MANDARIN GROVE PL 4407 W DALE ST 10 PAPAYA ST # 706 TAMPA FL 33647 - 3095 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 CRANOR, DAVID K CRISTIE ANNE ENTERPRISES LLC CRUDELE, MICHAEL J CRANOR, TOWANA K PO BOX 120 CRUDELE, SHIELA M 12043 HAWTHORNE RIDGE BLOOMINGDALE IL 60108 - 0120 1516 FOX HILL PL FISHERS IN 46037 - 8822 VALRICO FL 33594 - 4021 CUNNINGHAM, TODD W D'AMORE, EUGENE R DAVIS, DEXTER C 9703 RHAPSODY DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 607 ALEXANDER-DAVIS, LISA VIENNA VA 22181 - 3240 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 5806 GALLEON WAY TAMPA FL 33615 - 3634 DAVIS, DEXTER C DAY, WILLIAM A THE DEFERRARI, DIANA DAVIS, LISA ALEXANDER 1968 LAKEVIEW AVE 110 HARBOR DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 1009 DRACUT MA 01826 - 3210 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 DELLATERZA, ROBIN DENTICE, JOSEPH F THE DIGIANNANTONIO, GILBERT DELLATERZA, JAMES DENTICE, ELLEN L THE DIGIANNANTONIO, PAULETTE 10 CYPRESS DR 5053 LAKEVIEW CT 3717 WOODRIDGE PL CEDAR KNOLLS NJ 07927 - 1558 OCONOMOWOC WI 53066 - PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 2449 DIMMITT, LARRY H JR DIORIO, RONALD L DORSCH, DANIEL J 150 WILLADEL DR DIORIO, SANDRA R DORSCH, CYNTHIA P BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1942 3944 NORTH FIELD DR 6326 W MACLAURIN DR BELLBROOK OH 45305 - 8802 TAMPA FL 33647 - 1163 DOUSE, ROBERT S DOWNS, JANE ECKALL INVESTMENTS LLC DOUSE, GWEN A 50 JONATHAN DR 2201 4TH AVE N # 200 1605 CLAUDIA WAY NEW ULM MN 56073 - 3343 ST PETERSBURG FL 33713 - 7911 NORTH WALES PA 19454 - 3679 • EGAN, JOHN M 10 PAPAYA ST # 1604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2057 EKREN TRUST 3061 DOXBERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2003 ELSAKR, ASHRAF ELSAKR, MONA 808 SMOKERISE BLVD PORT ORANGE FL 32127 - 7783 EPSTEIN, JOEL EPSTEIN, DIANE A 40 DEERPATH CT OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2054 ENGEBRETSEN, ARDEN B 10 PAPAYA ST # 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2058 EQUITABLE HOLDING CO LLC 7667 EQUITABLE DR # 201 ` EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 - 4626 ELIAS, SCOTT D 1435 N CLEVELAND # E CHICAGO IL 60610 - 1135 ENTEL, ROBERT J 521 MANDALAY AVE APT 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 ESPOSITO, TONY 501 MANDALAY AVE # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1710 F S N PROPERTIES LLC FALLER, JANET L PERSONAL RESID FALLON, JOSEPH 9909 RACETRACK RD FALLER, JANET L THE FALLON, SHEILA TAMPA FL 33626 - 4458 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1209 1 RIVERSIDE PL UNIT 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 COVINGTON KY 41011 - 1766 FARRELL, BRIAN M FARRELL, CYNTHIA B 5116 WESTSHORE DR NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 8007 FERRELL, CLIFFORD N FERRELL, ROSEMARIE A 2328 COLGATE DR FAYETTEVILLE NC 28304 - 5309 FERRO, MICHAEL P 3003 SOUTH WELLS CHICAGO IL 60616 - 2739 FISHER, PAMELA M FISHER, LOUIS R 907 BUNKER VIEW DR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2813 FLOTO, RONALD J FLOTO, NANCY C 54 SASSOON ROAD POKFULAM 00000 - HONG KONG GAREL-JONES, PHILIP THE GAREL-JONES, BEATA THE 120 LANSDOWNE RD S OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - CANADA GIANFILIPPO, JOHN F GIANFILIPPO, LAURA L 162 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 FISHER, PAMELA FISHER, NELSON J 817 BUNKERVIEW DR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2812 FULLBACH INVESTMENTS LLC 2201 4TH ST N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 GAUDIN, DANIELE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 GIANFILIPPO, JOHN BURKETT, FRANKLIN S 1775 CEDAR WAXWING CT PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6676 FLORIN, WOLFGANG M FLORIN, SUSAN 13072 PONTOFINO TRINITY FL 34655 - GAHERTY, JOHN B SR GAHERTY, CECILIA G 5527 S PARK AVE HINSDALE IL 60521 - 5061 GELEP, MARY H GELEP, PAULA 2020 BAYSHORE DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3425 GIANNAS, SPIRO P GIANNAS, STATHIA P 25745 SANTOS WAY WESLEY CHAPEL FL 33544 - 5513 GIBSON, PAUL F GILBERT, DONNA J GONZALEZ, EDWARD A 521 MANDALAY AVE # 610 GILBERT, HAROLD E GONZALEZ, MARITZA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 10 PAPAYA ST # 705 9400 LAWS RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 CLERMONT FL 34714 - 9262 • • GRANT, ERIC GREENBERG, ROBYN B GRIECO, DANIEL J II 1004 ROYAL PASS RD 11 SAN MARCO ST # 804 GRIECO, DIANE Y TAMPA FL 33602 - 5708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 521 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1700 GRUBER, CRAIG M HAIST, SCOTT J HALE, CAROLYN SMITH 10 PAPAYA ST APT 502 HAIST, MELISSA KAY FIELDS, ELIZABETH SMITH CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 3659 JUSTIN DR 1107 CONCORD ST PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3603 CHATTANOOGA TN 37405 - 3101 HALL, ROGER W HALLERAN, EDWARD M HALLERAN, EDWARD M HALL, SYLVIA M SIKA, STEPHEN SIKA, STEPHEN 521 MANDALAY AVE # 803 1005 VICTORIA DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5749 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 HANNA, ASHRAF F HANNA, VICTORIA HARMON, THOMAS S JR HANNA, MIRANDA Z HANNA, ATIF HARMON, DEANNE L 3509 SHORELINE CIR 29W 471 SUNSET RIDGE RD 3321 W SEVILLAAVE PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 BARTLETT IL 60103 - 2047 TAMPA FL 33629 - HARTMAN, DOLORES M THE HARTMAN, JEFFREY E HAYDON, CHARLES R UTA 3-30-82 HARTMAN, MARISA A 1601 DRUID RD E 1850 SAN MATEO DR 5 CORD GRASS LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4512 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3719 OLD LYME CT 06371 - 2080 HAYNES, ALVIN S HEIDI INVESTMENT TRUST HEILMAN FAMILY LTD PTNSHP HAYNES, BITA P BENJAMIN BUILDERS REALTY 941 BAY ESPLANADE 501 MANDALAY AVE # 401 TRUST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 69 MASS AVE LUNENBERG MA 01462 - 1212 HEILMANS RESTAURANTS INC HILDEBRANDT, MARK THE HILL, ANNE M THE 447 MANDALAY AVE 33 OLD LAKE RD 2510 S DUNDEE ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2013 HAWTHORN WOODS IL 60047 - 8018 TAMPA FL 33629 - 6411 HIND, GRAHAM R M HOERNIG, LAURA HOERNIG, OTTO W SILVER LODGE TWENTYPENCE RD 337 RIVER BEND RD HOERNIG, JUANITA S WILBURTON GREAT FALLS VA 22066 - 4138 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1201 ELY CAMBRIDGESHIRE CB63RN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 00009- UNITED KINGDOM HORVATH, KLARA HULLING, DON C HUNTER HOTEL CO ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III HULLING, TRICE D PO BOX 7230 11 SAN MARCO ST # 506 14008 SHADY SHORES DR DES MOINES IA 50309 - 7230 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 TAMPA FL 33613 - 1931 HURLEY, G JOHN HYC, PETER HYDUK, RANDY HURLEY, MAUREEN JOYCE HYC, ANDY HYDUK, APRIL 22 FOXTAIL CIR 505 MANDALAY AVE 20539 COUNTRYSIDE DR CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE CO 80113 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1716 MACOMB MI 48044 - 3589 4125 ISHAK, REDA H BISHAY, MANAR 12 PINEWOOD HILLS LONGMEADOW MA 01106 - 1663 J & M PROP APOLLO BEACH 907 BUNKER VIEW DR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2813 J N E BEACH CONDOS LLC 6326 MACLAURIN DR TAMPA FL 33647 - 1163 JOHNSON 2003 LIV TRUST JOHNSON, GEORGE A THE 10 PAPAYA ST # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 KAESTNER, JOHN T KAESTNER,JOANN M 777 CARMAN MEADOWS DR BALLWIN MO 63021 - 7174 KAIZER, JEFFREY R KAIZER, LISA B 3303 LEGAL CREST DR LONGWOOD FL 32779 - KEIR, LEONARD KEIR, BERNTRUD 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2076 KER, G CAMERON KER, LISA A 2426 BUTTERNUT CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2252 KLEINBERG, MILTON M KLEINBERG, MARSHA A 6034 COUNTRY CLUB OAKS PL OMAHA NE 68152 - 2009 0 IVERSON, DONALD D 1001 SAN MARCO ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - J E C FUNDING INC PO BOX 4689 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4689 JACOBSEN, GLENN C JACOBSEN, BARBARA D 6 FERRAND WOODS SAINT LOUIS MO 63124 - JOPPERT, MARCOS SNODGRASS, SUSAN M 5010 W THE RIVIERA ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 3613 • IYER, VENKIT S IYER, LAKSHMI V 3469 SHORELINE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 J M C FAMILY INVESTMENTS LTD 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 JENNINGS, MARK K JENNINGS, VICKI B 8471 FLOWERING CHERRY LN 1244 LAUREL MD 20723 - 1010 KAHLER, PERRY E KAHLER, VICKI LEE 8927 MAGNOLIA CHASE CIR TAMPA FL 33647 - 2220 KAROUNOS, THEODORE P KAROUNOS, LORRAINE J 444 PINE HILL RD LEONIA NJ 07605 - 1420 KEITH E. ZAYAC, P.E., RLA 701 SOUTH ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404, SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 JOYCE, JILL E 521 MANDALAY AVE # 602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 KAHRS, CAROLYN J KAHRS, HENRY G 4834 QUILL CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3699 KARTES, BOB KARTES, MARIA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 KELLY, THOMAS L THE KELLY, KATHLEEN F THE 11 SAN MARCO ST # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 KIEFFER, ALAN L KLABISCH, MATTHEW M KIEFFER, NELLI L KLABISCH, SUSAN M 521 MANDALAY AVE # 501 11348 CEDARWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 FRANKFORT IL 60423 - 7854 KNOWLTON, JOHN P THE KNUTSON, WILLIAM R II KNOWLTON, CATHIE L THE KNUTSON, CAROLE M W180 N8217 DESTINY DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 802 MENOMONEE FALLS WI 53051 - 3503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 KOCH, MYRON KOENIG, NORBERT KOKOMO PROPERTIES LLC KOCH, ELIZABETH KOENIG, BRUNHILDE 657 SOUNDVIEW DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 810 44 EILEEN AVE PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 4246 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 PLAINVIEW NY 11803 - 5203 KOPANAKIS, WILLIAM A KOSENE, STACY KOTCHMAN, CASEY J THE 501 MANDALAY AVE # 402 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1102 8442 125TH CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 3200 KOVACS, ALEX G KOVACS, VIOLET C KOZMINSKI, JACEK KOVACS, SANDEE G 23 ROCKAWAY ST KOZMINSKI, GRAZYNA 323 6TH AVE N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1739 4758 S PULASKI RD INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - CHICAGO IL 60632 - 4114 2549 KROLL, WOLFGANG KULKARNI, VINEET KUNIS, SABINA KROLL, LILLI NAGALE, VISHWANATH KUNIS, NAUM 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 3426 DORAL DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 801 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 WATERLOO IA 50701 - 4628 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 L B J LLC LA BELLE ELECTRIC INC LA SAL MOTEL CONDO ASSN 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD 24546 21 MILE RD PO BOX 1054 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 MACOMB MI 48042 - 5111 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 1054 LAMBRINIDES FAMILY IRREV TRUST LATCH TRUST LEBRON, GEORGE 2175 VALLEY VIEW DR 43 CLOUD VIEW RD LEBRON, SONIA DUDZIAK ROCKY RIVER OH 44116 - 2860 SAUSALITO CA 94965 - 2006 506 TAMARACK DR BARTLETT IL 60103 - 1515 LEE, PAUL J LEVINE, RICHARD LEVY, MARK S LEE, AGNES S LEVINE, BARBARA LEVY, DEBORAH T 9715 STONECLIFF CT 5047 OTIS AVE 10005 RADELIFFE DR CLARENCE NY 14031 - 2439 TARZANA CA 91356 - 4207 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2511 LIEBERMAN, LAWRENCE T LOCKETT, THERESA LOWE, JEFF LIEBERMAN, DEBORAH S 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1003 LOWE, KATHY 10 WILLOWOOD LN CL•EARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 700 DEER VUE LN OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2058 FENTON MO 63026 - 3562 LOWRY, RICHARD M LYLE, JOHN F M B C PROPERTIES II LLC LOWRY, ALEXIS LYLE, NANCY S 4500 NORTHWOODS LN 1648 RIPARIAN DR - PMB 247 BLOOMINGTON IN 47404 - 9420 NAPERVILLE IL 60565 - 4173 8905 KINGSTON PIKE # 12 KNOXVILLE TN 37923 - 5021 MACK, DAVID A REVOCABLE TRUST MACRE, DANIEL M MAGRATH, JAMES P MACK, DAVID A THE MACRE, ANNETTE MAGRATH, CAROL A 30 JELLIFF LN 505 MANDALAY AVE # 75 2 PRITCHARD LN SOUTHPORT CT 06890 - 1482 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1718 WESTPORT CT 06880 - 5633 MAGUIRE, PAUL J MAJEWSKI, DENISE M THE MALACHOWSKI, JERRY PO BOX 2925 SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINE J MALACHOWSKI, DOROTHY SAN RAMON CA 94583 - 7925 43 LAKE ADALYN DR S 1426 SEMAR CT SOUTH BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 9542 MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 - 2984 MANDALAY 802 MANDALAY BEACH CLUB CONDO MANDALAY BUILDING PO BOX 120 ASSN PARTNERSHIP BLOOMINGDALE IL 60108 - 0120 2201 4TH ST N # 200 499 MANDALAY AVE ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2045 MANDALAY LAND TRUST MANION, JOSEPH M MARCO, SAN TRUST 3711 SWANN AVE MANION, JANINE M CHASE, WALTER W BEN TAMPA FL 33609 - 4521 10118 BENNINGTON DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1405 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 MAROTTOLI, ANTHONY MARRULLIER, ALAN H MARY G. REALTY, INC. 10 PAPAYA ST # 306 501 MANDALAY AVE # 706 490 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 CLEARWATER, FL 33767-2007 MAZAS LAND TRUST MC CARTHY, EUGENE REV TRUST MC CULLOUGH, JACKIE E MAZAS, BILL W THE 2505 ENTERPRISE RD 744 BAY ESPLANADE 1600 GULF BLVD # 7117 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1100 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1411 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 MC DERMOTT, JAMES T MC DERMOTT, JAMES T MC LAY, DAVID THE DRAPP, SHANNON M DRAPP, SHANNON M PO BOX 7153 501 MANDALAY AVE # 702 521 MANDALAY DR # 904 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 7153 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 MC SWIGGIN, JAMES MEEHAN, THOMAS P MENKE DEV MC SWIGGINS, CHERYL A 521 MANDALAY AVE # 810 1053 ST GREGORY ST 12 SAXONY ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 CINCINNATI OH 45202 - 1733 CLIFTON PARK NY 12065 - 1655 MESTAS, DONALD M JR MIHOLICS, JOHN C MIKHAIL, MAGUED N MESTAS, CAROL S MIHOLICS, MARIA T MARZOUK, CHRISTIANE G 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1108 18 WINGATE PL 591 BELTED KINGFISHER DR N CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 YONKERS NY 10705 - 1533 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6149 MIKHAIL, MAGUED MILLINGTON, CHARLES J MINA, GEORGE I MARZOUK, CHRISTIANE MILLINGTON, JULIA B MINA, AMAL A 591 BELTED KINGFISHER DR N 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1006 4783 EDGE PARK DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6149 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 4845 MOHR, GREGORY A MOLLER, ANDREW K MOMESSO, SERGIO F MOHR, KATHLEEN L 12175 OXBOW DR MOMESSO, NOELLA NOORY 2873 ROEHAMPTON CLOSE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 - 4261 10 JONQUILLE TARPON SPGS FL 34688 - 8426 KIRKLAND QC H9H 3C4 00030 - CANADA MORRIS, MICHELLE V MOULIS, JAMES M MUDD, JAMES A 29 GAYLORD GLEN MOULIS, SUSAN B MUDD, CECELIA K WATERBURY CT 06708 - 2100 3302 ROCKY BEACH RD 6919 CHANCELLOR DR MC HENRY IL 60051 - 9669 CEDAR FALLS IA 50613 - 6956 0 . . MURRAY, SUSAN L NAGALE, VISHWANATH T NEAL, RALPH C 902 ANCHORAGE RD NAGALE, PUSHPAMALA V NEAL, JULIE A TAMPA FL 33602 - 5754 521 MANDALAY AVE # 508 4622 OSAGE CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 GREENBAY WI 54313 - 9531 NEUWOLF PARTNERS NOLL, STEPHEN A NORUS, KEVIN 2100 CLEARWATER DR NOLL, DEBORAH V 11816 MARBLEHEAD DR OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1927 501 MANDALAY AVE # 701 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2553 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 NOVICKY, STEVEN D NOVOGRATZ, JOSEPH O'HANLEN, PETER NOVICKY, KIMBERLY M 7667 EQUITABLE DR O'HANLEN, TERRIE 5850 DEER SPRING RUN EDEN PRARIE MN 55344 - 3696 10 PAPAYA ST #1102 CANFIELD OH 44406 - 7613 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 OLIVER, BRIAN C OLIVER, ROBERT ORISSA PROPERTIES LTD OLIVER, JEANINE H OLIVER, CHARLOTTE B 31 BROAD ST 3739 MULLENHURST DR 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1210 ST HELIER JERSEY JE4 CXW 00000 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3661 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 - CHANNEL ISLANDS P K& J K INC P S B CREDIT SERV INC PACK, JAMES D 5020 CENTRAL AVE PO BOX 38 PACK, MARY B ST PETERSBURG FL 33707 - 1942 PRINSBURG MN 56281 - 0038 30146 E TOPAZ DR SCOTTSDALE AZ 85258 - PAPAYA TRUST PAPPAS, PETER C PARADES, ANTONIO M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1405 225 ROBINSON ST # 540 10 PAPAYA ST # 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 ORLANDO FL 32801 - 4321 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2055 PARAMOUNT LLC PAULL, DENNIS M PECORARO, ERNEST A 1803 BRIAR CREEK BLVD PAULL, DIANE P PECORARO, NYDIA SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4696 10104 RADCLIFFE DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 112 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2512 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2066 PENN COMMONS LP PERNICE, SALVATORE J PERRY, GREGORY G 871 BEAVER DR PERNICE, BARBARA F LAHN, MONICA L DUBOIS PA 15801 - 2511 3 N 614 CENTRAL CT 1574 SHINING ORE DR ADDISON IL 60101 - 3052 BRENTWOOD TN 37027 - 2218 PERTILE, RICHARD K PETERS, MICHAEL L PETH, NICK A PERTILE, DEBORAH J PETERS, STEPHANIE S PO BOX 580 1137 MARINA DR 22 CLYDE GRUVER RD WAYNESVILLE OH 45068 - 0580 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 6713 BINGHAMTON NY 13901 - 6022 PFAFF, ROBERT PILATO, SAM A PITTMAN, C CHRISTOPHER PFAFF, BETTY PILATO, TALMA PITTMAN, KAREN G 521 MANDALAY AVE # 404 3257 NICKS PL 1099 SHIPWATCH CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2017 TAMPA FL 33602 - 5736 • PLANES, REGINA M PLANES, REGINA PODGURSKI, MICHAEL A 32700 US HIGHWAY 19 N 854 CYPRESS LAKEVIEW CT PODGURSKI, LINDA G PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 3119 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 7307 1125 W POWDERHORN RD MACHANICSBURG PA 17050 - 2007 POMS, ALAN M POOLE, WILLIAM L III POTTER, PASCHOALENA 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1007 ROBINSON, JOHN CONNIE JR 463 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 3 HUNTERS CROSSING CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2033 THE WOODLANDS TX 77381 - 4757 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE RAGHAVAN, CHAKRAVARTHY RAMOS, JAMES A 419 E SHORE DR RAGHAVAN, VASANTHY RAMOS, CONNIE R CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 8918 SOUTHERN BREEZE DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 310 ORLANDO FL 32836 - 5012 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1707 RECEVEUR, RONALD L REHKEMPER, PHILIP A REINHARDT, MARK 6012 REGAL SPRINGS DR REHKEMPER, BARBARA A REINHARDT, CONNIE K LOUISVILLE KY 40205 - 3319 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1105 N3080 MEADE ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 APPLETON WI 54913 - 9571 REISS, KENNETH P RENDEL, JEROLD S TRUST RESIDENCES AT SANDPEARL 11 SAN MARCO ST # 308 660 SNUG ISL RESORT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1829 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 RIGBY, GREGORY S ROBULAK, KENNETH J RODWELL, ERIC V RIGBY, CAROLE J ROBULAK, PATRICIA J RODWELL, DONNA M 124 OWASCO ST 521 MANDALAY AVE # 302 11 SAN MARCO ST # 408 AUBURN NY 13021 - 4114 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 ROSCOE, GREGORY J ROSSDALE MGMT INC ROTH, ELIZABETH W ROSCOE, LINDA L 120 LANSDOWNE RD S 8826 NAUTILUS DR PO BOX 308 OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - TAMPA FL 33635 - 1339 DUBOIS PA 15801 - 0308 CANADA ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III ROWLAND, CLARENCE E 2112 WATERS AVE HORVATH, KLARA HORVATH, KLARA TAMPA FL 33604 - 2748 11 SAN MARCO ST # 602 11 SAN MARCO ST # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 RUKAVINA, JAMES SAID, NADER SALTZMAN, MURRAY RUKAVINA, DIANNE SAID, HALA SALTZMAN, BARBARA BOX 6448 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1007 1170 GULF BLVD # 306 EDSON AB T7E 1T8 00030- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2780 CANADA SAMEE, AHMED B SAMPSON, THOMAS A SAND KEY CONSULTING LLC 1182 PINE RIDGE CIR # E3 SAMPSON, CAROLYN L 1015 NORTH RIVER WALK E TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 6423 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1202 CHICAGO IL 60610 - 7398 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 0 • SAND KEY CONSULTING LLC SANDOZ, DAVID C SCHAEFER, RANDY THE BOBAK, WLADYSLAW SANDOZ, ANN L 3225 S MACDILL AVE # 268 180 DINAH RD 523 N OKLAHOMA AVE TAMPA FL 33629 - 8171 MEDINAH IL 60157 - MORTON IL 61550 - 2373 SCHECHTER, JANIS ILENE SERAG, SHERIF SHEAR, MARILYN F REVOCAB LEWIS-SERAG, MAHA 2650 MCCORMICK DR STE 130 12103 MARBLEHEAD DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1206 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1062 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 SHEPPARD, KERILYN SHIVERS, EDWARD T SIINO, WILLIAM J SHEPPARD, KRISTIN SHIVERS, HAZEL E SIINO, MICHAEL T 328 SIX MILE RD 10 PAPAYA ST # 505 13519 FALCON POINTE DR WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - 9565 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 ORLANDO FL 32837 - 5327 SMITH, DONALD F THE SMITH, MERLE W SNYDER, CLIFFORD D SMITH, MARY H THE SMITH, DIANA T SNYDER, MARYLIN V 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1506 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1201 1650 WACHTLER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 SAINT PAUL MN 55118 - 3745 SOBEL, KATHY SOBOTKA, JOSEPH J SOTEREANOS, STELLA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 503 SOBOTKA, SYLVIA R SOTEREANOS, STACEY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 52 THOROUGHBRED DR 307 S DITHRIDGE # 808 HOLLAND PA 18966 - 2570 PITTSBURGH PA 15213 - 3519 SPARKS, SUSAN M ST JOHN, DENNIS THE STANISLAWEK, DANIEL 11 SAN MARCO ST N # 1105 ST JOHN, VALERIE STANISLAWEK, GRETA CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 342 E JERICHO TPKE 501 MANDALAY AVE # 309 MINCOLA NY 11501 - 2111 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1707 STENBERG, ANDREW STEPHANS, SUSAN STOJAK, JAMES L 10 PAPAYA ST # 301 STEPHANS, DORIS STOJAK, ROBIN L CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 803 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 3964 MULLENHURST DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3004 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3665 SUCHARSKI, FRANK J SWIDEREK, TIMOTHY J TADROS, HANI S SUCHARSKI, CATHERINE J SWIDEREK, JOSEPH A YASSAOUI, SUZANNE 248 AMERICAN DR 4540 WEATHERVANE DR 2184 LAURENCE DR RICHBORO PA 18954 - 1141 ALPHARETTE GA 30022 - 3759 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6466 TANKEL, ROBERT L TAYLOR, DAVID R TEJEDA, RAFAEL E TANKEL, TERRI G WALTERS, JAMES TEJEDA, IDELFIA A 1022 MAIN ST # D 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1004 3516 WOODRIDGE PL DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5237 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 2434 TEMA INVESTMENTS THOMAS-KIRSCHKE, HEIDI THWAITE, EDWARD W 3135 SW 3RD AVE 525 MANDALAY AVE # 24 THWAITE, PATRICIA A MIAMI FL 33129 - 2711 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1798 15 LOOK OUT POINTE TRL TOTOWA NJ 07512 - THWAITE, EDWARD THWAITE, PATRICIA 15 LOOKOUT POINT TRL TOTOWA NJ 07512 - 1611 TURLEY, STEWART TURLEY, LINDA A 10 PAPAYA ST # 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2057 VITOLA, JOHN R VITOLA, GEORGINE A 218 S BROAD ST BROOKSVILLE FL 34601 - 2832 WARD, MICHAEL S WARD, GISELLE V 407 SOUTH ROYAL PALM WAY TAMPA FL 33609 - 3728 WELLS, DARCY L NALEY, STEVE W 705 BAY ESPLANADE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 YEAROUT, JANE R YEAROUT, JANET A 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 YOFAN, AVI YOFAN, JACQUELINE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 ZAMANI, SAM S FEIZIPOUR, MAHVASH 1957 LOGAN MANOR DR RESTON VA 20190 - 3276 TOUCHTON,JOANN TOUCHTON, WALTER W 10 PAPAYA ST # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 URINO, FRANK N & NATALIE TRUST 1627 MIDNIGHT PASS WAY CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1821 W J C C IRREVOCABLE RESIDENCE 10 PAPAYA ST # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 WARSTLER FAMILY TRUST WARSTLER, ARTHUR K THE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 WILLIAMS, BERNABE REVOCABLE TR WILLIAMS, BERNABE THE 1204 SUNCAST LN STE 2 ELDORADO HILLS CA 95762 - 9665 YEAROUT, JANE YEAROUT, JAMES 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 YOURTH, BRADLEY J YOURTH, VALERIE R 501 MANDALAY AVE # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 ZILISCH, BARBARA L THE 11 SAN MARCO ST # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 0 TSANGARIS, WILMA B TSANGARIS, NICHOLAS 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2076 VISOSO, ROBERTO VISOSO, GRACIELA 521 MANDALAY AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 WANDACHOWICZ, BOGDAN 10 PAPAYA ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2055 WEBER, JED P WEBER, JILL E 505 MANDALAY AVE N # 42 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1717 WILSON, CHRISTINE DEFERRARI WILSON, MARK A 136 HARBOR DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 YOFAN, ABRAHAM REAL ESTATE TRU YOFAN, AVI THE 10 PAPAYA ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 ZAKHARY, ATEF S 11 SAN MARCO ST # 603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 • i CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, January 16, 2007, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont'd from 12-19-06) New Horizons Properties, LLC and Affordable Dental, LLC (Mako Condominiums) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to height from 30 ft to 46.2 ft (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 ft for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 15.3 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 ft to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building/pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-404.17 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 ft to 5 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.6 of the Community Development Code. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings [11 units]) at 240-250 Skiff Pt., Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A, Lots 40 & 41. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-07045 2. City of Clearwater and Florida Power are requesting to amend conditions of approval to revise the completion dates for the upgrading of existing paved and unpaved parking lots for Bright House Networks Field required under Case Numbers FLD2002-07021A and FLD2004- 07055 (approved by the Community Development Board on April 15, 2003, and October 19, 2004, respectively). (Proposed Use: Bright House Networks Field and Joe DiMaggio Complex.) at 601 Old Coachman Rd and 2450 Drew St, Sec. 07/29/16, M & Bs 41.01, 41.02 & 43.01 Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2002-07021B/FLD2004-07055A 3. Tropicana Resort Land Trust and Flamingo Bay Condo Developers LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a commercial dock in conjunction with existing hotels/motels at 300, 316 and 326 Hamden Dr. for 20 slips totaling 2,734 sq ft, under the provisions of Sec.3-601.C.3. (Proposed Use: Commercial dock) at 300, 316 & 326 Hamden Dr,.. Columbia Sub No 3 Lots 1 & IA & RIP RTS and Blk A, Lot 3 of Columbia Sub Replat, Lots 2 & 2A, 3 & 3A Lots 4 & 4A & RIP RTS. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-10054 4. Marv G Realty, Inc (Gionis by the Sea) is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (9 attached dwellings and 4,350 sq ft of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Ave) setback from 15 ft to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont St) from 15 ft to 13 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), an 0 0 i increase to building height from 35 ft to 80.17 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a sight visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Ave and Baymont St, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Mixed Use [9 attached dwellings and 4,350 sq ft of retail floor area]) at 490 Mandalay Ave, Clearwater Beach Park, Lots 57-63 & part of lot 64. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III.. FLD2006-10057 5. United Dominion Realty Trust (Bay Cove) are requesting Flexible Development approval to redevelop an existing attached. dwelling complex in the Medium High Density Residential District with a reduction from 2 parking spaces to 1.92 parking spaces (an increase from the existing 1.90 parking space), a reduction to the waterfront (east) setback from 25 ft to 8 feet (to stairwell/entryway), a reduction to the waterfront (east) setback from 15 ft to 2 feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (north & south) setbacks from 10 ft to 5 feet (to existing parking/drive aisles), an increase in fence height from 3 ft to 6 ft, as a Residential Infill Project, per Sec. 2- 404.F. Also included is a reduction to an existing perimeter landscape buffer along the side (north and south) setbacks from 10 ft to 5 ft as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, per Sec 3- 1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 19135 US Highway 19 N, Sec 20/29/16, M & B 23.04. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006-09052 6. Rottlund Homes of Florida, Inc. is requesting Flexible Development application to construct a subdivision perimeter wall in the Low Density Residential (LDR) District with an increase to the maximum wall ht from 3 ft to 8 ft along the front (west) boundary and an increase to the maximum wall ht from 3 ft to 6 ft along the front (south) boundary of the subdivision, as a Residential Infill Project, pursuant to Sec. 2-103.B.. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwellings) at 26952 d Ave. S, Chautauqua, Sec A Unit 1, Blk 37, Lots 1-7, Lots 8-16 & Vac 80ft r/w lying E of Lots 15 & 16 & E of N ''/z, Sec 32/28/16, M & Bs 31.04 & 31.05. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006-10056 7. Wisne Development, LLC. (Alan L. Wisne) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 999 sq-ft multi-use dock with 6 slips for the residents of Palm Bluff Preserve subdivision, located in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with an increase to the maximum dock length from 139.9 ft to 187.2 ft, under the provisions of Sec. 3-601. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock with 6 slips for 8 detached dwellings) at 1202 Sunset Dr., Palm Bluff Preserve Tract `B' Pool & Rec Area. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006- 06038 8. Alice 'H & Ronald P Nisk, THE are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit an automobile service station in the Commercial (C) District contiguous to a parcel of land zoned residential with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 15-49 ft (to air/vacuum pad), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), and to permit off-street parking in the Office (O) District with outdoor lighting remaining on from dusk to dawn with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 feet to 18 feet as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Program under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C; (2) to permit, nonresidential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with outdoor lighting remaining on from dusk to dawn as Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-204.E; (3) to permit a wall 6 ft high in the front setback in the Office (O) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project 0 1 0 Y under the provisions of Sec. 2-1004.B.and (4) to permit a wall 6 ft high in the front setback in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-204.E. (Related to ANX2006-10039). (Proposed Use: Automobile Service Station) at 205 N Belcher Rd., Temple Terrace, I" Add Blk D, Lots 1 & 2, Lot 30 & part of Lot 29 & Sec 07/29/16, M&B 33.12. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2006- 10058 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m..and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 5624567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 01 /04/07 I TY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT PosT 0i;;; ;I: Box 4748, CI.EARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 M NICIPXI. SERVICES BiitLni\G, 100 SOUTH MYRTU., AVf:NIili CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 I'ia.r:PUOE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4565 LONG RANGE PIANNIyG D1. FLOPWN1' R,,-IviFw January 17, 2007 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-10057 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Zayac: This. letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On January 16, 2007, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use (nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to building), reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) from 15 feet to 13 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 5.5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to six feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 80.17 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached ,dwellings) to 19 spaces and a deviation to allow the building within a sight visibility triangle, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The subject 0.4 acres is located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street; 2. The current use of the site is for a shopping center with retail sales and a restaurant; 3. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Destination Resort" District; 4. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a mixed-use building of nine attached dwellings and 4,350 square feet of retail floor area and represents the preferred form of redevelopment, in compliance with the vision in Beach by Design for this area and site specifically; 5. The retail floor area has been designed to provide for as many as four retail units facing Mandalay Avenue at a zero front setback in compliance with the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; FRANK I IMBARD, iNIAMR J01IN DORA\, CO!'XCIIAWM!WN 1IM-1 I l i i!!'rc x. Cor: u.:,.nt>u!r:R R11.i. IU,.'\.SC)V, Cc!i„ c:nLM FM BER A. PrI rR',FN, OWN IDUN)WR 'T'Qt AI. ENIPLONNIENT A?JIB Arrn;,a!Ar!Vr: Acrim I:mn'!u)i::W' January 17, 2007 Zayac - Page Two 6. The proposed setbacks are consistent with existing setbacks for other projects in close proximity within this urban context; 7. The proposed building height is 80.17 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) and is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The applicant proposes 19 parking spaces on-site, including one handicap space, to accommodate the nine residential units in the building at two parking spaces per unit; 9. The proposal includes a reduction to required parking from 40 spaces (22 spaces for retail sales; 18 spaces for attached dwellings) to 19 spaces; 10. A Parking Demand Study has been submitted providing the justification for the parking reduction; 11. The design of the residential portion of the proposed building is similar to that reviewed in September 2006; 12. The retail sales portion of the proposed building is compatible with other projects in the vicinity, including the Sandpearl project adjacently south; 13. The requested elimination of the foundation landscaping along the east (Mandalay Avenue) and north (Baymont Street) sides of the building, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria; and 14. That there is an active Code Enforcement case for this property regarding property maintenance issues, which has little bearing on the decision of this application. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards as per Tables 2-801.1 and 2-803 of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a Declaration of Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 3. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all dumpsters be enclosed within trash rooms or screened trash areas, including those for the commercial units, acceptable to the Planning and Solid Waste Departments, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 5. That all utility equipment, including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and gas meters, etc., be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That, prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant revise the site plans to show removal and replacement of the existing parallel parking spaces and existing sidewalk and reconstruct the sidewalk at a 2% cross slope to bring the finished floor elevation of the building to 5.00; V. . January 17, 2007 Zayac - Page Three 7. That, prior to issuance of any permits, the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue; 8. That only elevator equipment or other mechanical rooms be permitted above the sixth floor; 9. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be monument-style, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 10. That the applicant submit a survey when the sixth floor is constructed verifying this top living floor is less than 75 feet from the lowest fire vehicle access (street). Should this height be 75 feet or more, then a high rise fire package will be required; 11. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. That any applicable Public Art and Design Impact Fee be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; and 13. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (January 16, 2008). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-5023 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 30, 2007 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/plannin . Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD) Ilnactive or Finished Applications Wandalay 490 Gionis (7) - ApprovedWandalay 490 Development Order 1.17.07.doc 2cw~ loo 5~ , . - 1 F ~ "INVESTIGATE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE" ' ¦ a • CALL SUNSHINE ®1-800-432-4770 ~ FL, STATUTE 553,851 (1979) REQUIRES A MIN, OF 2 DAYS AND MAX, OF 5 DAYS N011CE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE, INDEX VICINITY MAP COVER SHEET 1 3 wKmH ,p xASSw womd K+r. uuncx T~3 ,w„ suwµrs£ DEMOLITION PLAN 2 Y S uewrc wwwn tenor ` ~ OVF ~ pAY flU4pH AnIIE SITE PLAN 3 601AI eucxW XIRWA tEW MA9011 Y0.~9N GRADING, DRAINAGE, & UTILITY PLAN 4 IAA ' EI1PL8 a sa~~ HlWN pryygp UTILITY & LANDSCAPE DETAILS 5 . PASCO y 093M `L~ flX6U6 p NV. LANDSCAPE PLAN 6 PROJEC ~ VICINITY .n£ o~~ x~awwos ~3 Q suuWU osmm . xwrw n } -j ~ [flNLpf1E ~IADES ¦ ¦ BIYXA.D N.T.S. amp :k . { _ ~ 1 NOTE COf~ISTRUCTLON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOPJ, ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND CITY OF CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION - LOCATION MAP ~-c r _ i.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. ~ a_ - LOTS 57 THROUGH. 63 INCLUSIVE AND THE NORTH 10.25 FEET OF LOT 64, CLEARWATER ~ ~ x 7_. x s ~ _ imm BEACH PARK, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 42, PUBLIC ~7 u~ll i e RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. tF ~ E r~u.<ls~l~ mt ~xw ~ , ~ ^F? f,r.'~i,i i~rii fi r~ ~ ~ . O r~,"~ h. ~~}r~c~l~:t~l' ~ ~~7i ~ v 'TM' ¦ ¦ ¦ `9,~~~uu~~ri %~J `S, ~F ~ ~I~'~ KLAN AI~PRaV~D ' ~,~~~,T CASE # I~-~ ~ o ~ • I D n s7 ~~o~' ~N~O ,*i x O~ .~i, +.Y'~, ~ ~n CASE TYPE ~ ~ . ; a~, ,u . ~ , ~ 'I 3 _ v .u A G~fCli~~~k~ H ~~f DICC DATE 12 o t, ' ~ • '"rt c k CDB DATE ~ P ,o ~<< r~ p ~..1 ~.1~ ,_,.kti ~~~C769 ~~j I * ¢ v ~~S SIGNATU E . ry DA9 E I I ~ ~4~~fr ° ~ ~~~C~Y~(~e~ .c ~.A CIVILENGIN~.ERING LANDSCAPE ARChITECTUR~. PLANNING o ,~a,,;~ CANNING 1 ~ 11111k4k Mti~i',~ rd^a e f n ~ 7~l NTCR SAD C C]IT>: 40 h ~ -a~~~~d n~ i SAFCT1' I-IARl30R `~[,C~R[DA 3~C,~5 3 PHD~C:727J93988~ Dmwhg llltle Frl?t: 7~?7.7~39855 i I~NtAIL: KEfI~I [«~~KC1T} fZAYA~uCO~~t COVER 0 SHEET ORIGINAL 0 u RECEIVED N ~C . aw.a s.., ~a UtL 4 LltUb - nv} nw - Agency App. / Permit No. Date Issued / Date Expires ? Expires Owner Proj Noa 451-05 SWFWMD PLANNING DEPARTMENT Scale. SEE SHEETS P CITY OF CLEARWATER a z CITY OF CLEARWATER Shoot No. rn c a 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 1 of 6 - 4" DROP AT ALL DRIVES , Z ti Miied Use Calculation for Gionis Property - 490 Mandalay Avenue Z' Z` _ " WEARING SURFACE is zoned Tourist District ma~mum FAR =1.0 and magimnm densi = 30 du/acre 1 1 /2 R A. .Property ( ty ) 6 6- nacre) GRAPHIC SCALE ~ ~ ,\a a ~ ~a 0 1o zo ~o k ° a ° o / :~::;;d: ~ L .Permitted FAR ..................................................................1"0 ~I ~I r J Q ' ' ~ 2, Building square footage ofnon-residential portion , , , , , , , , , , , x 4,350 sf 1ti ti o z 3. Lot area requu'ed to support non-residential use m the burldmg 4,350 sf Q Y ~ i;Q,;,1,~ N (IN FEET) ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ -BASE 4. Lot area 17,457.56sf ~ a r : 1 inch = 20 ft. }'-UJ _ h- oo ~ ~ 9'' 3. Subtract the lot area required to support , ~ NOTE: Concrete to be 3,000 psi, with Aber mesh reinforcing. ~ ,y : Q: : ~ d: non-residential use in the building (#A3) 4,350 sf COMPACTED U U • 6. Lot areas to calculate the maximum number of dwelling units =13,107.56 sf • ' SUBGRADE ' ( fl 2-1/2" min 2„ min r ~ 'str 7,r' LEGEND ~ ~ ~ 7. Divide #A6 .........13107.56 sf N / - ~ / ~//~i ...................u , \ N _ 8. Land area in an acre 43,560sf- \ - ~ 9. Lot acres e ~~r~~€..Mtl...- 0.300 acres ~ (TYP.) TYPICAL ~,r rr ~ ~ N ~ ~ 70P EL=4.22 • • • hdE I E_U_t4 Q~ 1 rr~ Q lti 1 1 t e........,r - ~..0.300~ es i 'is'` PROJECT BOUNDARY u~ Z 10. Mu p y o acreag pct -T -T r ti< ~~,!~~I 1 L Maxunum density i. fir. ~ 30 Y~" err// rr ~ ~ m ~ 7-3/4° ~3 Bar 7-1/T ~3 Bar ~ N~1 Nr~''~ ~ ! i.~a, . ,oral A I G H T CURB 12. Maxunum number of dwellm amts permitted I. ~ dp > ~ Typical TYP ~ ! _ r i ( ~ EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED HQ _ _ u z ~ PEA TYPE C _ F.L_::~, ~L ;,a~•Ir~ahr-~i~[ ' TY INDEX 101 ~ pp--rr rr ; ~ - _C1~iC/ TOt x(....4.62 / I fARYyMEI- ~ / r \ ~ _ ~ CITY GF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ° ~~;j~ ~I__ ,y N LE.= _ 5 31 i -3.01 ~ ~ C~RaIPd4GE hdH ,`!';'a`',~; • ~ O J S ADMINISTRATION 'fit-- t' - 1_ .L 41 ~ t. Lf_. 3.01 PU6lJC WORK ~ _I-C~~ ~ f~ S LE,--3.3?. i. ENdNEERINO c. - _ _ q-___ _.,0 II i BAs halt %I TOP EL-1.30 !'.:a,... . --3.3? , N ~x. PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. ~ ~ ro Conu curb - ATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT TYP II;,~ W LEA--~ 03 % / a WHEEL STOPS etsx ea M . , ,pY~ AMxo,. ea ~ ~2j- RAMPS W f._. - r,'- 11„ r -.i.03 % ~ 1/ P1E I,E,=-1 43 .,;.i•,:, y,,,,"• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ 1 ~~i/ SWIk: 1.71 ~ ~ ~ ~ u • REINFORCED CGNCREiE ,j Sa.PdIIHI?Y. BAH S CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SHALL -,c; _ II , e•s o+rz ooarnart w?. f a• 1 a ~ R.as. 1 PUP EL= ,.45 a. / i # f IJW I E, L6~ ~ ~ 1 - uJ ~ w - - ,_BEf?'__THlCK.3000 psi FIBER ME ~U/ ~ i PEf~ I~tl`cr1 INDEX #304 _ _ - ,-t c ',r._ ~ , _ PJ LL.--1,04 „ / E LE.=-ts5 E.. ti-xfi 10'x1U` ~ r - - - :.Girr~,'1r'N "SV'J7C .I _ !l-~__-_._.----~ scurrl r31.~~~~io U ~`~c~_....._... ~ ~--_--~-~',r GENERAL NOTES: ~ ~ ~ ~ z i ,rc II 1 :x Or-D JuIITSTER ) R-1 ~.T~i. !1;~ ~ ; • 4~ITH S,wiJDh1,.~.. _ _C..._ _C,! I ~ ii ~~ING STAGING i / I F7 ! riJ r tlANagIPPtDSxN .._..__.--~tRE~A.~.T _ OP SIGN - _ _ -I~~ _u~-...._.._.....__.._.. f7pn iU Po.ver ^A,H l ~ U ' ~ _ ~ _._l_..._..---. t! ~src scrx Nor 11s r _4- ~ r' 4 WHITE ~lU I I I, 1. t. rc_.__ - ti !1,, , - (2) 20x20 SIGHT STOP LINE r'vfe!~ - - 1. ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC, ~ Pest- :~-~1=~.__ _--li _ ___(1_}--3 x2D~..iNTER'S _ VISIBILITY TRIANGLE d ~ i -1 ~ SIBILIITY (ANGLE -2 'x20/ iNTER'~ECTION ~ 31LI~TY ~ IANGLE (TYP.'i ~ 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 _s._-.._ .w , talc, wwc AwtP nowt oxtc, wax _A=- ~ Y ~ - ~ ~ r.i t f : l r ~ P~ rl N,~J E,e.trlc-, I ~ . SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 ~ ~ _ 9FF epEK N0. 10C T,; ,t, s ~ ^z~ r4cy r ; ~ ` ':r (rlog`o~ ~ n „f,, ~ Conc. Bor, ,bag°, 1.r9 67:,, r:~ „ I~~~~~ (727) 793 9888 Bus ~ ~ e• woE tAUnc ws1E h I.~ ~ , r d I ~"-c. ~ . _ C 71~I SIIRL ir~ ~E (~'u~ rl' M' LfO tiiY '1- r r I- ~c~r~,~r_r«1 -~h' ; l~ Tl7F' ~,oi (727) 793-9855 Fax Z' r~r MF l E ---0..9 v fJr G (}45SV1'Q~kr.. ~c`,t4// /r __,___._-J-----6„wm .r. r } r ~ 4 a•: e..• ~ °°°"ay`~ )~~rS,'17(ii- rr- ~Jr1 J; (}4SSV1'Q,k iDD. 5.' C . g :31 ~ ~ , ° ~ r", ~ * %'i~~i' dg^~"°~e~..a9 tL. l'' C - 1 ~6 "W i_~:.,._.~_s~JWm~~r;~ 2. SLTE ADDRESS #1: 490 MANDALAY AVE. ~ A . \ L~ ~ ~ x__.. _ - - - Frn~ 4 ~'a r ~ oa ~ I ~~,i . ~F. r ~ ~ ~ ; CLEARWATER, FL 33767 ~ 1RAfl1G N1iRE a , ; 7 nn r n - ~ ~ - \ 3.00 ~ I d ~.lr--- ..B 5. , a ~ r 2,50 I I ~NG~f (Jred~ , ~i ~~AiE Ir~~FT_ PARCEL ID: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 '~-t, O I j; -TCP EL ~ ~2 ~ ~I ~ • I:~ rr LE o.,~:; .ZONING: "T» %i li r ~ Elox I II~ SLF 066 I.0 ~ Jh. I ~VJ~ 'Fi~rn[cr tr 1 ~ ~ A , ; f(~~? ~ 3. PRESENT USE 1 RESTAURANT & 2 COMMERCIAL BUILDING ~ r, - I l ~ NOTE: I i ~ c A I ~ ! I' WF+ w ~ ~ I; ~ 4. DEVELOPED .USE 9 .MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS & 4350 fsq RETAIL STORE ~ ~ All pavement markings to be therrnoplaetic• I ( ~ ~ I I `la 9" ~ I I ° , c j v y, I I I r~ I~I~ ~ ~ 5. TOTAL SITE AREA 17,457.56 SF (0.40 ACRE) ~ ~ 1 ('L( I ~ W e ~ ~I( / I ,I < . ~ I 1 .n rn~ I I H~~ II ~1 n I 1 r , REQUIRED PROPOSED U , LGT 55 ~ tp I ~ ~ 1 I .r,' , AIL- ~ ~ ~ , : p,: p,,~ 6, SETBACKS. 15' FRONT 13.00' MIN. (NORTH TO BLDG,) DET ^ I S ALL T CA PED P AND( .~Na NLEf H TE I - I t:;., i ln• CFA TOP Ft~=2.99 0.00' (NORTH TO DUMPSTER STAGING AREA) 1 I I I I C OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA I f ~ E_ LE-. -Q.2.6 0.00' (EAST TO BUILDING) PU~&JC WGRKS ADMINISTRATION r,'~ I~ ~ ~ I1 ENOINEERINO I ~ I li ^ ~ : I I I 3 II~ ! a II I`` 9,r t n TYPICAL 9NOLE ~a~ I E ' . I~f fL=.s.11 wn: a+rz o M?. ,GF4 :4.Y:,;; F.F.. 4.50 , ~ ( 11 N I .1 I E r, ss 1 U' SIDE 5.50' MIN. WEST TO PAVEMENT) ' w ~I•~.~Er<r Itaa~cES°I~~E. 6,00' MIN. SOUTH TO SIDEWALK) L.GT ~4 j I I Fnwer;~ I rn ~ ~ I ~~~ox~j W - 10.00' MIN. (SOUTH TO PAVEMENT) ~ Q a'. I ro I . r, 1 1 I Zo Z~ J ~a 7. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 35'-100' FT ~ I-+ STANDARD PRE-PAINTED 13 I I I T I K i r_. ¦ Q L PROPOSED BLDG, HEIGHT 80'-1 1/2" FROM FEMA LINE TO MID-POINT OF ROOF. ~ ~ DISABLm PARKING SIGN I ~ I a I I I - (1) H.C. SIGN & I ` ~ EXISTING CONC. ~ WHRE BORDER ON 1/B" THICK SHEEP & srMBOL aLUMINUM WHEEL STOP PER ll _ . I 1 I ~ I t~ ~ ! I I SIDEWALK ~ ,I ~ o BLUE BACKGROUND CITY OF CLEARWATER ~,e ~ ~ s,+~ i I I I m Qm o ~ i' 24 ` "i' ~ 6 WHITE. STRIP G. m INdE~T11~3118 & 119 l , ~ ~ r r 18 i! ai ~Q 8. SOLID WASTE DUMPSTER WILL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING PARKING BY _ ~ I I I , Q . 11 I f Q BIACK BORDER DISABLED '0, I I ~ II ( Qm Qm ~ a ~ LErrERS .PERMIT I i I i , (I ~ WHmi BACKGROUND ONLY , ^ I I I ' I ~ , I ! lf' 17.5 PASSENGER ~ 6 I t. . t cs I ~ I ~ I l QQ I ,JQ 9, LIGHTING WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDARIES WILL BE ATTACHED TO ~ W Q w BLACK BoROER ~ FINE CAR TURNING . I 1 I ~ - r 4„ ~ ~ LEFlEAS ~ TEMPLATE ~~Il~ 0 OQ BUILDING. AND WILL BE.SUBMITTED AS PART OF FINAL BUILDING PLANS.. ~ E~ ~ WHITE BACKGROUND F.S. 316.14 M I I ~ ' a i~ rJlf~. ' Q rn I v I I ' z ~ N I I W, ! I i;~ I k~ ~ V Z~ I ~ ~ ~ Q I ALL LETTERS N c ~ I ~ I I I f I I I t° SEPoES "C" p I - I ~7 Q~ ~ _ Z ~ ~ ST~P~IIGfIT5 RB 5.5' ? I ~ ~ ~ I / 10. EXISTLNG BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS = 6,255 SF = 0.14 ACRE. 4` NoT DIPPED GALVANIZED PER CITY I DEX iv I ~ ~ , I ~ ' sTANDARD wE1GHr stEE1 PIPE #101 (TYP). j ^ I ; j Jv ~ ~ , 'TYPICAL COLUM ',s A110 70 co ~y. a I G 4 WHITE. TRAFFIC 14 , ~ W 11. ALL DISTURBED GRASS WITHIN RIGHT=OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. ~ o ~ ~ A4Ci' ~ Q•"'r~i•`'r •'I I ~w''rt?'.'••a PAINT TYP ~ I Z E i Is `,'~„1'~ 1~":~?~~; r, I f ')-..._I '~iCX I I w I 12. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS .MUST BE REMOVED AND .REPLACED WITH .CURB a o w b: a: - I j j ~ r1 ~ ! , CONSTRUCT 6 RIGHT - :,,I k. - e"x4'-s` CONCRETE MASS, ~ II CURB TO MATS' (STING a _ i i OP OF MASS LEVEL I FlNISH T ' I r ~ ',~o'~" LA Ir A SUCHT RAISED WASH a ...n WRH i - N LGT .~1 I , 'I I . I• APPROxIMATELY 1 2" ABOVE I v a '1~'.~ s l ! ' SIDEWALK, AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS ~ ~ z v ~ • I W / I c... , i• I 'rl le. • - "LEVEL OF NRF/SOD, r I ! r S A FLOOD ZONE:.. w w ~ n• i l n. 11:6 I 1 _ ~ _ y a~.~ MATCH ISTI EW LK (pYP) THIS STRUCTURE APPEARS TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE "AE" (EL 12), a a = .r I MWATER POND ~ I .l i T. I a ? r . ,TDB = 4.00 ` TI I I / ~ ~ ff ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL • ',d ' ~ - - BOTTOM= 2.50 U, I PROP SED ENT I. CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA - - - I ~ NUMBER 125096 0102 G. MAP REVISED DATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. g" PUBLIC WORKS ADMIt11STRATION ' : , . I' N W .pf : , ~ I ~ ~ I ENDINEERINO I~ PROVIDED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. N N N N N } Y Y Y Y Y m - K wrz „ 5p' r " . is I Ulp,~a. E ` r 't `cl I Q1 t n~ ' T 0 ED P uAaew s/ee tta ~ 10 h r... fk c ~ , vl, i L 4 f i7 I ~G, L I HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL ~,rz ,l _ ~ f;:,~..:. PARK( G SP ( jl 14. THE PROJECT SIGNAGE WILL MEET THE CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE. ~;a SETBACK LINE ~--.__a~F~~. \ `I '>v . 4 e. 1„t e (TYP) L.OT b'1• N 83'2158" PROPOS D CO RTE ( Remove Curb ii Exk+tin - 4 W 15. THERE ARE NO UTILITY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE SURVEY, ; 3 3 3 3 ~ z ~ (M) _ 1 e Exist Cana Drive ,ter'... rrlot Inch d d) d' 100 (p '1-'~~ SIDEWAL ~ r H.: il 1 V' ~ J , f 0 ~ I, c r'' 1 v i ~ ~ K ~ ~ N Q Q Q Q " a 1 10 , ~ ! K ' , 0 . 0 ~ Back of Curb Max 9 12' • 12 Max SI e ! ° ~ d (M) Corc, I ti . I I A ~ D1 1 ~T oP p. ~ e- ~ a f ~J U U U U ~ E tkR-11~ A9uMF T CG N)J ~t:OhL'. ~•d ~a.~ e d ~~d' .d f II ~ ~ O 4, $t';'~5: :~•',r:r:'rq, r;N~ 4, ~ (~i e.LQ M' ~ j iS " ' .a ~ a ~ ' a ~ a ~ •tr' el -r I ~ V 1 16. THERE ARE NO ENVIROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ W j ~ s ~~a~.c~~ ~ Q t Joint ' ~ ~o '6' .a, _ lt7 ; t. h \ I I ~ ~ f Ex ,Joint g• o RETAINING WALL. WITH ,a ~ I,, CU ~ I ff E ~ f ~ STRAIG T (YP ) I ~ _ 2„ IG RAILING ~ ~ c~• ~ I I ! ~ ' l ~ 1 EATION FACILITY IMPACT FEE IS DUE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR TO " I ~ ~n F~. 17. A $200 RECR ~ TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION ~I ,clydo ! R.O.. l e . (b - 1 ~ ~ f ; r d!' I m - - 4 CONC: SIDEWALK o I I I'( Lf ; 6 `07 o - L.~T 65 l fCNB .4../ ~r,~,l/jVD-D ~1 ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR FINAL PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) WHICH EVER OCCURS. FIRST. W a n. a a w ~ V _ V N Cone. Sidewalk I ~ r II ~ I ~ ,t ~ ~ SP CONTACT. ART KADER AT 727.562.4824. ~ W W W W II B B FCiR 5 8 I! PLAN VIEW I ) i MATCH EXIS 'I SIDEWALK ( P ` ~ i I ~ c~ pia, ~ I ~ , ~ ~P~~ ~ 18. DUMPSTER SERVICE SHALL BE ARRANGED WITH SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE r ~ ~~,~;/~o Oo ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. N o ~ a N ~ 0 5 ~ 0 4' MN Raidentid Stroet 1' C R ~~7 ; I Remove Back of Curb on State a Vertical Curbs with a vartlwl Saw cui a 5' Min Arterld Street 2' County R c`'.... , ~ i i PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT .727.562.4930 N ~ ~ ~ N ~ L17a _ oooo~ a Remove anike Curb and Replace ore Part of Sidewdk Rarlp, 1, N t°- ~ ~ r'' CJ~j I I lvrs Ir%%) i 98B I ! 1 Madlfbd and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4' Per Foot W I IQ Join exMt back of curb ti- I Is ,.e fr I iv j1='i NMd' ~ ~ 19. THE .VERTICAL CLEAR HEIGHT OF THE PARKING GARAGE IS A MINIMUM OF 8'-2" TO Z 12" Texturod Surface • r,. ~ ~ J?~" 35~~'~ ACCOMMODATE VAN .ACCESS "'PER ADA FLORIDA BUILDING CODE CH. 11 SECTION 11-4, 6.5 ~ v~_o„Z~n rn i•p,~Max Slope +,n,'~.r,,, Back of Curb 3000 psi coot 4' thick. Constr. 6' t 3 M • • • thick ai driveways with 6x6 X10 welded wiro mesh. See note 7• m ~ Remove to an o r ~\1/2" Expanalan Joint even Joint a eowcut SITE DATA: '~tiNi~rurl~rr 0 N EXISTING; PROPOSED: REQUIRED; ~ ~ o SECTION A-A SECTION B-B , NOw3; ;r' a~~`s.1 ~ ~ 0 1. Prodde lolled Jdnb at dbtenc» metchbq the wklth, Also 4 Aanpe (hoe haw a taeiGe eurrace, lexiund to a depth not A, TOTAL SITE AREA 17,457.56 SF (0.40 AC) 17,457.56 SF (0,40 AC) 10,000,00 SF y l Z l1 w ~ e~b.we°ti drhnrop.~l~ t, ~ ash exaedhq,/e" b er temp a rdlw h conrownana wHh PROPOSED PROPERTY PROPERTY of eld~Iwd~ker» shown a~iitaet the En hew°`°si Dn~teto era q hemma er tfDOt nooaway end Trains Deegi staiaader PROPOSED q q ~at~amoetr"»tm°d,~e'>on` BUILDING LINE LINE B. TOTAL OPEN SPACE 1,683 SF (0.03 AC) 5,232,22 SF (0.12 AC) 872,88 SF (0.05 AC MIN.) ~ mi ' eo . r,'z ~ „ u ~ ~~^~"080"• ~ 42" RAILING BUILDING ~ S weeder and othw epean wil not be perrnltbd h eldewa&e a T• 0. B. EL. = 4.00 C. BUILDING .FOOTPRINT 6,255 SF 9,922.34 SF 17,457,56 S,F. (1.0 FAR) e~: ~ ~ o µ N°i1 ~7~~. or my kind «rl b. P•~t~ 00Aa•t• PROPOSED PROPOSED ~ ewewalke a dHwwey+ wNhoul epeclAo approwl or the city CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Enginew, PUBIJC WORKS ADMINISTRATION / I I SIDEWALK ER SIDEWALK STORMWAT ' N Q All eonaele ehol M SaOD pl min, 048 doye, wWi taw a ,N~ x"b. ti0• ENOINEEAINO D. SIDEWALK/DECK/PAVED AREA: 9,519.56 SF 3,303 SF - ~ ~ ~ W E mesh nbitorahq, _ s Vas .wdred TrTNCU SDEWALK POND ~ m coNSTRUCnoN AND ~ STORMWATER ~ ~ . ~ 7.Oonuete drrlwwa teoneleu tkn shell be B' thkk w 6#/10x10 f tf nwdAed al ±;r ~ a. E. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 15,774.56 SF (0,90 ISR) 12,225.34 SF (0.70 ISR) 16,584.82 SF (0,95 ISR MAX.) ~ \ ~ •Q,~~:f~ , ~ welded wFa mesh rahrorcement. 0 - w+r• m RAMP DETAN. 'B eev: a1rz oeeerieii POND ~ / / _ - o , of a ~ \ \~\i\\\ ,,:.2 \,a\\~~\\/ EL•-2:50 F. PARKING SPACES 26 SPACES 19 SPACES (ON-SITE) 40 SPACES ~ ~}`Z - a BOTTOM EL.=2.50 /i// / / \ C \\j~\\\\\\\T\\.~\\r\\r\\r \ r, r, / - G. VEHICULAR AREA 7,595,84 SF 2 798 SF v\ r 1. r• LL r: b LLL y~ , r\\r\\i\\i\\r\\r\\ r\/\/ • , ~ DRAWN BY: HAZ H INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA N/A N/A Iv/" CHECK BY: KEz ORIGINAL DATE: 02/27/06 I. MULTI FAMILY UNITS 0 9 UNITS 12 UNITS (30 UNITS/ACRE) SECTION B-B SECTION A A J. RETAIL SALES & SERVICES 6,255 S.F. (0.35 FAR) 4,350 S.F. (0.28 FAR) 17,457.56 (1.0 FAR) SHEET E ° N.T.S. N.T.S. z •3 3 of 6 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 0 0 ISSUE DATE: 12.14.06 8' U,D. 3'-4' N 12' 24" 4'-4' ~ Finish grade to al N , , finish grade to allow RAW 9 5/8 0.4 min., 1.0 rr .o ~ fall from props 0.4' min., 1.0' rnax. fall from property Z I I ao ~ ~ cleanout Plu line to back of cr Ouifall Plpe ~ I ,o g ne to back of curb. , - 2-1/4" 2-1/4" „ a ~ Minimum 36" Behind Back Of Aluminum Skimmer p M ~ Curb 6aak of Gurb ' GRAPHIC SCALE ~ z _ p Or Edge of Pavement 3'-0" ~ , ~t ~ ~ ~ o ,o zo Weir ~ ° 0 36' o ~ I o$ m o v 36" sidewalk ~ ~ + N o c 10 5 8" ~n ~ ~ m m Concrete Pad 4 - / ~c' `'ICI ~ t Thick x 1'-6" Sq. 9 7 8" / B" 8" , (IN FEET) VU--IJ concrete Pad TYPE E 6" or S"- 1/8 Bend -y ~ cleanout Under Skimmer m Straight Baro 2' k 3/16" ~ Q cleanout 1 inch = 20 ft. W Raticullne Baro 1-1/4" x 3/18" M ~ Plu Double-Sweep Teems, Oeslgn Hlgh PLAN VIEW Bantle 1-1/2" x 1/4" See Note M Water Level 5-3/4" E Bolts Per Approx. Weight 215 lbe, ( -Sweep Teel 30"-36" ar as _ Directed by the 'v \ ye City Engineer 5-3/4" ~ FDOT Index 201 » Tap of Bank= 4.00 3._ . 8 Grate Elev.= 3.90 NOTES » LEGEND o£ r Steel 2' L Fasten skimmer wlkh 4 stainless Sewer Main 13 1/2 n ° Grote sled belie w/ lead ancharo CITY OWNED OWNED HOMEOWNER OWNED j'F EXISTING UTILITY/POWER POLE ~ ~ 2" 01 2. Seal dl edges of skimmer at AND MAINTAINED Weir Elev.= 2.98 contact polnia wllh eUucturo with AINTAINED AND MAINTAINED ~ Q' wateryroof caaiking or approved equal C LE A N O U T -PLUG D E TA I L go Aluminum Skimmer dev= 2,80 F }r;~....._ EXISTING WATER MAIN ~ CLEANOUT DETAIL 6" Service Lateral 'e Pond Bottom Elev.= 2.50 ~ N.T.S. 7teral w _ N.T.S. Main EXISTING SANITARY MAIN ~ ~ ~ ~ o NOTE: cleanout plug to be U.S. Foundry 7621 ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE WRITTEN ~ ~ - ~ APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. ~J' EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE ~ ~ e " 8` 8" U.D. Outfall Pipe INK=0.85 or e ual. SECTION /4 Bars q Conc. Pad d 12" Ctrs " CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 4 Mtn. Install 8" (Mint PUBLIC WENGN ERIfNpISTRATiON ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FUNlIDA ~ 0 ~ PUBLIC WORKS ADNII~ISTRATWN ~ ~ ~ Gravel Bedding v"vo~ STORM SEWER STANDARD a s s,~ s~ ENOINEERINO SS PROPOSED SANITARY LINE Z ~ ~ CROSS-SECTIO Du1FAU coNTRa a °D o' N ~ /as/zam Nd~e »olw eo, a~1°.. I~~e' W.dS CIEAN WT ~ 7Ns we+e a r a ~ FDOT TYPE E INLET (Modified) ~ o~n sseasreow N?. W UNDER DRAIN i a t wN wa oEear~ Sanity i or 1 Rs oAx as ' S-11 PROPOSED STRUCTURE NUMBER ~ w ~ itv o~x anaanm MP. 1 a 3 ~ ~ ~ h u ~ ~ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER ' CITY INDEX #402 ® PROPOSED VALVE ~ U w ~ z ~ ; (1) 6"x6" TAPPING SLEEVE (1) 6" DDCV W BYPASS METER ox / & VALVE INSTALLED BY CITY INSTALLED BY CITY AT"APPLICANT'S ~ u~ w PROPOSED WATER METER ~ ~ ? T 6 AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE EXPENSE PER CITY INDEX #405 f ~D. N'GE 1 j?._ ! (1) 6"x2"x6" TEE & G,V. RAI . ~'H. (1) M T~R Bc BACKFLOW PREVENTER r D PROP05ED BACKFLOW PREVENTOR ~ 2 90' ELBOW roP Ei_- 4.2?. INST % D BY CITY AT APPLICANT (1) 2 VALVE \ EXP, E O FS PROPOSED FIRE LINE ~ ~ } 1'r 2" 'PVC W.S. fi CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL DOG HOUSE M.H. OVER EXISTING rbhl „ r ~ / 8 P.V.C. SEWER MAIN & CONNECT PROPOSED 6 SAN. fNCJ 1<~ _ 6 r~VC ~ a i w - PROPOSED WATER LINE Z a ~ ,rr ~ f , - SEWER ®INV.= (-)2.71 L/6 8 L ~ i~ % r ~,r"r1~ SAPIITARY MH - ) OPEN CUT & PAVE T >`1 - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSED STORM SEWER ~ ~ - `-C _ I~. TOP EL=4.82 / , / ~ REPAIR PER CITY INDEX r _ ~ (SEE SHEET N0. 5) ~ A . ~ E: IE- ,..01 / \ DR,~IiJ,a;>4..P~'H 1; Q REMOVE & REPLACES EXI T1N6 ...................__..-:_::56--LF__6_. QJ.,e,. _ _ ~ _L~C f I~ C _ , 1 /,asphart 1 / ToP EL.=4.3a o ~ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT ~ ~ I, _._...SERt~CE-~'f:0 N:_ - _ _ ._y~- _ l~~ ~ t I O. S I.L. J.32 1 ~ I 'I ~ INLET TOP W TYPE-"V"-PER-- - a- I. 1 / 1 I E I E, ,4~ ~i / Canc, Curh J" esC~C III lV LL.=~-s.U3 a FDOT INDE 221. J ~ " _ . I Ir. r ._.........._.._._._...__t r, l l 6__-SAN. A lolt .,E LE.=~-1.3J ~,w~_LIT,-CRY MEI ~~r==~ ~_;::-::-•c-«_._ _ # :_L_.l II / fC(' EL,:.I45 CC1RE~~R1LI~ ~`&'GONNEGT`'~`-'.: SERVIC l_.'G.I. u NW IE=_1.62 ~w nl LE.-- 1.01 PROPOSED 15 RCP C~'f. 01v1fN;--- _ . 1 ~ ' ~ PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES• ~ A~ Si,UTIi BLC'GkED i"~ _ PLU cr.°. <<BrlCr~ r ~~rrag - ~ t , . _ E R 0 S • ION C , ONTf 'rulrEt s~~.rJDeAUS N Aspno;t CONTROLS CTURE E-3 _ h I,~ 11 T _C C~ r ~ lrr r'cla Pvwer Mk , T v I ; S J CONTROL MEASURES NOTE: 1. SEE. GENERAL. NOTES SHEET AND DEMOLITION FOR EROSION AND SILTATION Zd, ~ CONTROL ALONG WITH GENERAL NOTES. ~ ~ I - Z r ! ' 1 ( _EL__ ~.8fz _ - - ~~r-~~---~-- ._ia,n.._...._._.._._...--- ~ REQUIRED EROSION CONTR ~ o -tr .r;c____- __N(ElR_-EL,.-_ 3.10 _cC:,~ ~ry 11 OSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT 2, SEE- SITE PLAN/HORIZONTAL CONTROL SHEET FOR SITE DATA. ~ = 0.6 - -__-A stet-- Z C I~~ _ ~ CONSTRUCTION. FAILURE 1 42' L.F. 15 RCP I V. - ~~~-,.-...__..~.1-___-__-_- - ~7_ _ _ ___...__....____...._......_.._._.._....__.._.._._::,:~_------v:_~~~,r~ r.,: - / - ~ r'~ ~ ~ / % BARRICADES WILL RESULT N. FAILURE TO INSTALL OR PROPERLY MAINTAIN THESE O WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE 3. SEE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR TEMPORARY BENCH O .FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER" " 7.~, ' ` - t ! ~ ~ " •~).'.M.::.. Ele~tr„- FND N~,l) / ~ ~ ~ CITATIONS, AS PROVIDED CITY INDEX #402 ' Conc ox ~ oo,o x !r~ 6IGi ~ „u INITIATION OF CIVIL PENAL ~ PROVIDED BY CHAPTERS 40D-4 AND 40D-40, F.A.C. MARK (TBM) LOCATIONS. ~ , a• ~ ruff,- DRAIfJACE hnH, . ,t. e ~ ~ I-„I r~r T. °F ~r - rcP rL a.o1 373:129, F.A.C. CAN REST CIVIL PENALTY PROCEDURES PURSUANT TO SECTION 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED U C., CAN RESULT IN A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED X10,000 IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MANUAL ___________-6 wm .~;o~ Cross4 ~r, `or ~ r- ~ -f-T'r~;; a cti n^ri k Crosslvvlk 1- -L-~ , li IvL LL - 0;)9 a ~ L. ,..A , r~ PER OFFENSE WITH E WITH EACH DATE DURING WHICH SUCH VIOLATION OCCURS PREPARED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS. tao ',$9.5b•31:, • ~ 4 . , • a , 4 0~s ~o _ •T. ~•y~_~.-T::C: -C: ~L. 6'r _.~1L1:-L::[~~~G, / S , .o. r ___,..........._...:...NOTE.....AC.LESS...Df31VE_MAY_._.._.-..__.,,...._.__... . ' ~ ~ T.x:C~_~~_..r-~=(:_~~-~:.."_'m.-_~-~T _t~l- CONSTITUTING A SEPARAT A SEPARATE OFFENSE CHANGE BASED ON PROPOS~~ 4 1 1 C0.61'(M r.... ~ ~ 5 ~ .i Fs r' I 5. ACCORDING TO F.LR.M COMMUNITY PANEL # 1250960102E ROAD IMPROVMENTS (BY OTk1EP~t~ t?j - 4.30: ~ '~3;b I rNG N~-~cD 11 ti - - 4. 3.00 ~ a L.fj •h/, n . fl _Il' I,E_T - THE SITE IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONES °AE" (ELEV 12) ~•to 2.50 j I Nat Used I1 1~c' ~L=3.32 ' INLET' C-1 i I tD.Ga ~ti, 0.1 ~1~% II r I E. O./J RIM EL.= 4.0 ~gnt ~ Ir' I I : I E :::~0.6r> 6. ALL DISTURBED -AREAS WITH IN R-O-W SHALL. BE SODDED. p.., y;2 nor ~ o II I l_OT 5 NV. = 2.00 -~n ,r II " S VJ Planter 7. BUDDING -ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED AND DISCHARGED di ~ P~ II _ 4,LP TO;STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS. ~ Q E-I 4.40 , INV,- 2.0 SUMP .y~ ~ ~ I _ GREASE TRAP ~ - ~ M , v I ~ V ~ ~ i~~-I LOCATION 2)-1T L.F. Ir .a ' I c'! 9" I I .C p 6 f I ~ ~ I ~ < II r m r ~ U 4.50 1 J 4.40 ~ it tiI II UTILITY NOTES w I i r n 4.40 li 41 II L.J ( ~5 ro ro _ 6 SAN PVC ~ I 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING ^ - ~ SERVICE ® ~ 'I canTE i~~t.er. I "°1c III - - _ F .1.00% MIN.. ? roP EL=2.99 I UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED ~ QI' W FROM THE CITY OF CLEARWATER UTILITY ATLAS. ~ ~ ~ a F LE.__.G.28 I _ ~ - ~ Ili ca~:r~ li~~l rT 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND COORDINATE WATER ~ ~ ~ SERVICE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ~ ~ ~ r° - g' II "fCP EL-3.11 - I ^ .r:; F.F. - 4.501 I LE. =--0.59 I LJ C JOE N ( I 'v T I 1,r- ~;ih f ~ 1 Pow'erll 4 N ER N~ l ES.,.,LE 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND COORDINATE SEWER ~ ~ Q I----._--~._~_ 4.40 A ~••??ax'~ ~ BoTTUM BOri_ LL 0 h2 SERVICE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ~ - _ E., ~ Z~ ~ i \ ~ ~ Q 4. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL ~ F ~ Z ~ 4 I I POWER SERVICE WITH LOCAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. Z o ~ 1 ti ~ „ ~ 1 n; a,; II Q~ J 5. SEE SITE' BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR LOCATION ~ ~ z ~ I h6 ~ If ~ O iJ U T~ OF OTHER EXISTING UTILITIES, ~ Ifs EL = 4,00 ~ ~ li INV. 2.00 ~ 4.50 5• ~ II Qm O ~ w V O I - - 1 ~ ~ 1 J 1 J~ 6. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL UTILITY NOTES. ~ a ~ 4.20 ~ ~ , C' W o a QQ I o~ N 1 tJ ~7jlj 7. INFORMATION DEPICTED REGARDING EXISTING UTILITIES IS Y y Y m M +r y '4 I Q 'r''a! r r. c~ I 1 Q ~ 4 r I ~ ~J MII, l Z~ APPROXIMATE AND IS NOT FIELD VERIFIED. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT 1 O W ~`iIw ~ U _ 1 g" Q I OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR WILL FIELD LOCATE & VERIFY I O II f z ~ Ir EXISTING UTILITIES e.g. TYPE OF UTILITY, INVERT, CONDUIT MATERIAL - _ ~ ~ aJ r, ECT. AND CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES ~ ~ AND/OR CONFLICTS. 3 ~ 3 3 W a a a a ~3 E - ~y ~ o _ 1 i<, , ~ A4(.P p v I - ~ 2 I ~ 1 Light II 4.4o N ~ RoX „ ~ 8. UNDERGROUND WATERMAINS AND HYDRANTS .SHALL BE INSTALLED, ~ U ~ ~ s r f 1 ~ r'ir, a i. I i I f 4.00 - ! ~ AND COMPLETED AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AS PER NFPA 241, 0 0 0 0 r°~ U m L~,I X11 Q , 7. o i' ~ 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL FIRE SERVICE LINE FROM TAPPING w a a a w s oRM SLEEVE & VALVE TO THE LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER ~ ~ g U ~ , . T WATER POND\ ~ o" OB - 4.00 ` I , AND FROM DEVICE TO BLDG. 2.50 ~ o ~°I 10.INSTALL A KNOX KEY BOX FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS AS PER I ~ r ~ ~ `a' ' ~'°'`ot 4 I s 1 NFPA 1; SEC..3-6 OR EOUILVALENT. CONTACT LIFE SAFETY MANAGEMENT ~ ~ ~ \ o OFFICE AT .CLEARWATER FIRE & RESCUE, 610 FRANKLIN STREET. THE LOCK "o "o o ° I wit? f~'Crl I s~ .y~- E~e~•fk, ~ ' I .a BOX MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION. N r~ ~ Z 3 ~ s Q LOT b 4~ N 83 2158" -~`'~--Y----o_ ' I h 11. THE BUILDING IS TO BE SPRINKLED AND MUST CONFORM TO NFPA-13. ; Not Iliciu~~ •c~ • •,..100 p ) , cf ~ D:W>-IfI-O Z(!1 ~ ! - ~ 100.00' s ' 12. THERE SHALL BE 7 1/2' FEET IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDES OF _ o _ a; E 'D IOF RIP 'IN STEM V~ALL COf~CRR~TE'~V'At~-T~° ~ Ci ~ - I1 THE FLRE HYDRANT, WITH 4 FOOT CLEARANCE TO THE REAR OF THE HYDRANT ~ 111 - ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED AS PER NFPA-1 ~sy` Z ~ ( 1..0I 4`~ ~s~ IN(/.= 2.00' (SUMP) (9x58'x1') OR (8,'x63'x1)~-~~, At ~ I1 ~ I ' o _ ~ VO 50 C ~ ~n I I I - _ L 4 U•FT. U~•, i ~ ~ fvf ifCH EXIS ING GR D _ v. I . - _ BOTTOM EL.= 2.50 " v - QP = 3.50 " 0 , 13. ALL UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, c~ SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ~ ~ ' . ~ 'a, i , L- - ~ a ~ ~ I I ..-t? 6707 rro,-,~aF v+ ~ I I n~• ,S~ Pvo-ler tell j Fi11f,' ,5/8' ~ T{NI~U WALL I E j LE3 6701 _ II / , _ ~ ~I I 14. A GATE TYPE LOCK BOX MUST BE PROVIDED. FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS TO COMPLY ~ W' WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF PINELLAS COUNTY ORDINANCE 98-04. APPLICATIONS 9~ . _ - FOR GATE TYPE LOCK BOX MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE -LIFE SAFETY MANAGEMEN ,CL,•,!~ ' - ~ ~ - sE r r~~l is I . OFFICE 'r • • • C}~ ~ a~ ~ - 15. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT STATES,. ~itt~~' m~ I - W I i q W ( Ih "NO PARKING, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION" AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED WITH DsAwN eY: HAz - ra, A CLEARANCE OF 7 1/2' FEET IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDES OF APPLIANCE C1 ' _ rn II AS PER NFPC 2004 EDITION. CHECK BY: kEz 1 7-'^ I li 16. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. ORIGINAL DATE: 02/27/06 - 2. 0.02 w) I o ^D I III S_4NITAF'( IJH z - ~ Y li SHEET 17, THE FHA WILL BE LOCATED NO FURTHER THAN 40-FEET FROM A FDC. - - FNi) lVh 3 ! - L8 6/07l I OP El.-•3.93 o 4 of 6 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY ISSUE DATE, 12.14.06 j I 6 :te e ~ V V , ~ ~ ~ ~ P i~ ~ V ~ Or' ~t ~ t..J ~ € t~l ~ V ~ e ' c \ ~ t~ e i ~ ~ f•f I' 41 ~ t (t:1 ~ 0 1 _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 57 through 63 Inclusive and the North 10.25 feet of Lot 64, CLEARWATER BEACH PARK, according / to Plat thereof, recorded in Pldt Book 10, .page 42;' Public Records of Pinellas County, Flol-ida. ~ 11 I DRAINAGE MH NE LE,-0.14 Q~/ ,1w ' TOP EL=4.22 ~ ~,N . END N&D ~~Zg ~a~ 11 LB 6928 A.~ , .393 _ ~ EL=4.28 ~ D = ~ - , I ©p SANITARY MH - NA lID 1988 4.09 ~ TOP EL=4.82 ~ l!/ ~ ; ~ ~y 3~ , , N I E =-3.31 A°b og °9 I o o f ~ r V E I E=-3.01 DRAINAGE MH a~ a a• ~ a Asphalt I; TOP EL=4:3D 11 r Q ,9 a _ ; ' ~F' Q S LE.=-3.32 . 0 3 3 i 3 J 4.06 _ y ~o c W LE:=-3.03 NE l.E.=-.1.43 y~-6 sr,2' Cone Curb 98 r54 ~ 9 ~ {ry SE LE.=-1.34 SANITARY MH T+" --259.0 °.'.~-----r Asphalt LOh , II''/ SW LE.=-1.7i TOP EL=4.45 1'" i ~ ~ Q NW. LE:=-1:62 N LE.- 1.04 Q2~-==-- ------s„3~-_ _.r.~0~_ B'P~C~ ~I a°`I I E LE.=-1.65 II 25 a , a - b - a. AZ AZ I a3 Ql?` S = 1~ f ~ SOUTH BLOCKED N ~-J~ ~~W~P) + Gox. & Brick Paving ~ S a I WITH SANDBAGS I! Asphalt a2 ; 4, 4.29 AR5 ~ ~ 4, 6 j F!o ida Power MH ~ _ BAYMONT STREET _ I _ ~ {i~ ~ ~-4"-Electiic Water Meters ! 65 n'11 Box Conc. Gurb 9° 9` 9'-Post 30bTq ~ , { I ~ 3gG . ~ `tBlack -Gamer p ~8 •11 ~ t d 9 • 3, • > FND N&D 8 ~ a6 s e ~ ~~4.6 alb ~ Electric 6 s 5 6 3 C hie RRRa / Backflow ~ Conc :Box a2 AA aE ou(t ~ LB 6707 , ' , A~6 a _ 35 .DRAINAGE MH _ ~ox ~OfIW Preventors , OH}y vo .e . A Ay~ A,d~go . ' yy5~"" ~~5y ~ 3• 9 TOP EL=G.01 - X01 4 C/SW ~a•.100.61 (M} a2 Crosswalk r r, ~ . NE LE.--0.79 NOS: - t8 rl N 89'56'31' E M r91 a°; L,.b~'\t'~04. CiP 4~2 .,.>n, 91'TS~gna( .Con A ,_._,~~~i. s LE.=-0.77 r ( a a 'a• a, a. 65 ~0) 32 4t C/SWa2 ' 9 ~ . 3 y'i,--r-'~r ,.a3 "'`T!`'~-._T_..._ a~ 1. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFDRMED WITHOUT. i' THE BENEFIT OF A .TITLE COMMITMENT, AND IS FCM 4X4 y1 ! yaa 4,98 ~ ab a 'S> .q.24 3be I 3(y2 Gi S81 y 6 GAS ~ ~:0 ~ 0 ~ : i SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND LB 67D7 ~ s S ti N 2 Asphalt 5 ,~n , 36 FND NcfC'D 332 ° Awnin y' 0 { 4.2 9 5776 ~I GRATE INLET 9 a, 14 ~ 5 p' 1 u. OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD THAT A Tf?LE o5 v~ ~ 2 as Covered LOT 57 c~ ~ 'A 8 90 ~ ~ ~NOf Used) TOP E~=3.32 b• ~ rle ''C45 A' `'Y I SEARCH MIGHT DISCLOSE. o ~ Sandicop ~ ` i ~p ~1~ (0.06'N 0.19''wY ; { N l.E.=-0.73 3.1' R' ign MLP c4,4c' Srnnicop Cr htM ' I. 95 1' h ~ i { S LE.=-0.66 ~ 2. PLANIMETRIC FEATURES SHOWN HEREOtd 9 ' 9-W~``-"~-E0~7,~ i v 9 a• lBoo ~ 3' a~8~'~ i ~S• it ..::'•i: A,a - COT ~ rg ~ !;y Oi g ~ ~ 0 I p WERE DETERMINED BY STANDARD FIELD LOT 56 _ ::.;2:;:450~`"'~--:.-., 6~ 58 ; t ! . et W~' 63 3.1) Planter 1 a2 A' 1 ' 3~ it....i?.'.`•:°7~ir.:i::`ia`:ii:;':I`:~ri~iiif:::.. 'ii::: :o::.e:..; ,~A, 'iUa i f\ 3. a~ SURVEYING METHODS. ..4:65. 51.8' ,l 6 r }_,~.MLP 3:63 ~ ~ .D - r'r',:~'i`'•ii•:~::::;:::`.~:~i:::`.;1ii~?;:?~}s:i::`iia'r:i;;~:Y(;(?::r::i: ~ °9 9`.'`r'' ^ I ~ J 5 i o a 3.0 b , R R FE N LINE IS E As halt 4,33}' p ) ^i' 16D ~ ~ oiF 3. ASSUMED BEA ING E RE CE TH P r M 4 T f 4 . ~ ti ' ~ J e' - fii:-:.:;...:;i::•:`i::•l:•}fr::;~4.~~i:•i;'';c~`:`r~;`ii;.`i::.if:`::~;~iiri~:~;r'~;rrj;~ . 1 R '3 ~ " WESTERLY RIGHT OF-WAY LINE OF MANDALAY a ~ 14 i°, I c o c iiiiii?`:i:'Ce~:i::::'r':.:e`.i'tYr:ii:(:i:ii:i ii?:'r:::°.C:r.:ei A1A ~•,..t D.S : .n. ~9" ~ti .C ~ . ,Q ~0 e AVENUE, BEING N6'29'E ACCORDING TO THE I y-::.:;?:;;:.:~~`?:'t:':I`:.:':a~F-:is:1.':::t'::~''t::;'::..'::~:.: r LOT i`, y~ i 4 t{ N PLAT "FIRST ADDITION TO CLEARWATER BEACH ,,.~V A ~"'`-'~-0 z' _ Qg ~ GJ Q { w r q - ~ i PARK", PLAT BOOK 15,. PAGE 80. ,uv r:::(;;.': ;;.;',•'::::'';I;`:::•:-:::.;';; ~ . A9A' . < ~ LL' ¢ ~ (Or,Sg ~4BS3 i o r ~ h ~ m anti ,~a5' nor 59-- 99. , ~ ~ ~ ~ a i ,i~ { I 4. ELE~tA110NS SHO'NN HEREON ARE IN NAVD LOT 55 ro ~ :;;•;:;W Q•- • :.•::o oq. I{ { 1986, AND REFERENCED TO „ITY GF r s iif'i=.' ~'.(n' ii:ii::.j:. M { TE IN T ~ ~'"L { g I GRA LE C { " - o :'Q LEA WA R NCHMARK H-02" PUBLISHED W ::I:I:";t't:::'.•::. I'":: ,g~ LOT °420 2 © _ q ~ C R TE BE 4 o , TGP EL-2.99 q1 1 ~:~';t;:; a Ab2 ~j , ~ 9 { { ~ a a. ! ~ ~ 3 k~' ELEVATION OF 5.2142, NAVD 1988.. 9~ A9 .7, n ~ 3q- 6 E :.E- 0.28 4,Q1 / . gb 9 GI 0 i Si { a. d~P r~ r M ~ N - r1 J: I - ~ nth 1 ` ost d f==~' y v i' 5. ELEVATIONS TO THE WEST OF THE = 5.07 ! ~ r s GRATE INLET PROPERTY. WERE NOT AVAILABLE TO THIS :::::::................--•s-_,.:~:°,: , I -°4.~bEc >~4,28 i to ~ ~ TOP EL=3J1 4.04` 3 6! 9 t N LE.=-0.59 SURVEYOR AS 1HE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS A o; ' • CL05ED CONSTRUCTION 51TE. ~.-,,.:.:.~.:-.`::I`-:1;1;'t;::'`:'.:i~':.: 4.9`""F',~. COT 59 ~ I+ I LOT 54 ~ 5.1, , Wooadi~-: rCOT sp ~M h ~ ~ Power ;V 3~2~ VJ IIJVERT INACCESSIBLE r La d 9, (1P•) rj i BOTTOM BOX EL=-0.52 - L~:~.:`:iiv..:;:.`:'•i~.:~:~`:;r::i::~`:i~i..:`.f:i''r:~"rr:~::c:'~ii'4....r? Box - { { i fi. ALL INSTRUMENTS L15TED ARE Ot• THE +:::::::~:::.`:.~::~';':::::::';;'•:::::::iiCiii:Ei?:::::'i:}::i: 15 3 51.x' Z 1 9' PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, isir.Sii's:.:e%ier:•iii:ir'°:::iciii:Si~~:r~ilCi:i .:i::iiirii•"~i'r . s"ii°•i::e:''°i:'.':ri':~ii:i'i::i'i~i':''S°:`~iil'.ii.{`.'.'''i:': FLORIDA, UNLESS OT'riER1"nSE NOTED ` q.41, A• II {;:;;..':;i~~:::;:::'t:;:t:'::;':=::i::::;:,.•::..`.~':'.=`i'~::' ~ Electric ~ WQ~ { eax LOT 60 ~ l 1 oti ;,a$ k'4:„6CLP 3,97 a. \ '~0 ~t . ,A32 4y i e °:7.;:.:::?;:: y::: - e COT sp 9" { 1i,J y. h:::.::•::~:•:: 1 STpRY~`'~~?';»~~~:: h' t for sr 4,11, ';,~y - LOT 53 f .......:.:..:>sMASO ~ 11 ~ ,65 506 a ............COM A ii::ic'i~~ii'. 5.7~ 2 ,\4 ,a91......,_ X4,.¢ ~ .q1 •Q ~ - • M i . LF ERC~ L 5, ~ :43 0 3< § ~ ~ ~ 333 ' o ~=5.92:;:.x;;:-;: -iit€.::;~i~ i a'` V { { g ~ f Q T 1 ~ I I o Q i 2 y, a s 0 ~ ° V ~ 9 ~ , r ~ l i 0 "9. N ~::::......:•.-.rii'r:•ir:i^::°:{~ ~i~~r`iii:.':,,..:°':iii~.` I ,8b p ag }~4.40~. i 3 . :`1 :.'.:;::;`.::`:~::•:;~:;::;:~:::i::;F;-;.-.:~.:.~:;::~:`":'•::: 5> » r Asphalt 1P6"~ ~ y o {Q ~Q~ , I1 ~ . ,09 COr • 9" I . p ~ , A • 2 I I ` ' ~ of i 6 6 i { ~ f a° 6 ?Cii:•isi•"::F:f"°i'i:::ro'':i•?:e'ii.°iii:'::'•iir:i^~: ~ ~ ' . LOT 52 \ ~ ~ ,.<....< , ; { a 2 V :??4::iiiii`k'ri::ii:'!ii:;2`';i:~:ri:i:iii'.ii:",:E:iiS:• U 5tio A. 1 r n4.35 1 t \ ~'~"r `I r' _ :::i'i~•ii•:ii'~:iii:.r:•.:.iii:'i~cr54ii:9tii°iC~::"ri::.kif':irr. z P - - e 3 ~ {i _ Planter (ryp.) I - ; OHW Planter trJp•) : a , °r::: c::::.r:.••1:.:::::•:.::.°:c•:.::c:::.:::•' .84 I ~+r~ 4.05.1 fp ,G~ 'e ~i? , I ' ~ ?::riii.'iii:?}:`iiii?:•"i•iiirii?i~:::.e.Q,i~.il~:•:iii;;iii'ri: i"';;:iS qt.. LO,T - VL O ~ I a9 A , . 1 ri:: :r: ~:r!Y~r}:iG'J,lt WaodI3,9 JBO ~ Landing (ryP.) { ~ • ~ cc: ~:.e:. •::::::.::::•::~::::::::~.-:.:.:......Ori:~:r?iii,~::~1i::iiriirr':;i ~5.D9- a5 LO_ .,.''i 1' ~ 34 ~ l - ~,,a• r 63 °:Y" Planter ~ h LOT 51 :.:;;::.;::~;:~;;~;.';:~c.~•::Z;:;•'::;;•.;;;~;;~;:: ~ ~o 9~,. ~ g. r k4.39 ~ f LJ ~3 1 0 , 6 Z I + , ~ Pa ,rig ~ h. ? ,+a 3.59 o ,I ' • r a , ~Stnpe(Typ.) a a 1 3,58. I o ~ I yb4 3r 'D<• ! \ 3,50 '19 I ~ g 4 ~ as ~ i 5 t Q o• 9 2 a, , r r A .t3 W 3 3 t i 'f°i"i:iitii• J . ~ LOT 63 ~ r4 ~ .,r, ~ , X12 a _ ~ f7 F CL 3.S' . ~ ~gg 'yam-y ~ { \ f I ~ i ~j Ff7h 2 1 2n 5a 400 ""-h"-,- LOT s3 Asphalt "~-B ~-1-~---V { Qj ~ i ~ { A12 a LOT 50 f s F/p LOT 4 Lor s4 , u { y w i ~ i Wtfh Noll .Electric ~ _ i e V a e ~ N sus 2 ~ s' Cable Bax ESP ,ao5~'~t,~.'-26A, ° cane ~ 1 e ~ ; ~ r GRAPHIC SCALE ' '7t < 51 9 Box 1 ~ r 1 .c o r a p ~ . 55 N $,j• ' „ a°A P1 31 Q ' o ~ 2D 0 tD 2D . i .LOT 64.' 2158 yy(M} ~ ~ .a I Planter ~ e I N ' w ~ (Not included) ~ ~ 100 (P) < . ~ 6 " 65 i I 09 ; , = m ~ ~ c ~ 500.0 f0" 3. I A~ 4 I o d. , < Conc a a ` . •2b r A ss t 2 ~ ~ 9 j Canc., ` . ~ < ~ I 3bE 21 ~ a~ rri LOT 49 ai,c`v s' S~. < Q ~y~ N-- 3 u ti <U ~~,B~z' 3 FAD N&0 e ~9~~ (IN .FEET) _ o ~ ° •s _ f . ~ ~5? ~ ~ 'o / O~ 49 LB 6707 r I ~ ,f 1 inch = 20 ft. o z ...off A4a ~ fir, tip` . u 3• Rondo r , LOT 65 .The North 10.25. ~ A' < Sag ~ ~ Power MI? 1. j v of Lot 64 ; ~ i { a5 r fC1B 5/B" { { LB 6707 li',_N2 ~t• ~ A26 y, 4.58 G$ro Dn { S~ N~lc' 1 a EL=4.08 , a SYMBOi. CEGEND ~ NA l~D 1988 ~ a' ~ ~{Q- 8000 STATEMENT: O ®=Water Meter - I {iy THIS STRUCNRE APPEARS TO 9E IN FLOOD ZONE "AE' ~ ~ =Fire Hydrant ~ i (EL 12), ACCORDING TD THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE fie., =U61iryPole TREE LEGEND ` " ~ I { MAP .COMMUNITY PANEL NLMBEP, 125096 0102 G ~ =Guy Anchor FND N&D ~ = Water b'alve „ r to ' ~ - ~ w PINE LB 5776 : p _ _ BY THE FEDERDLTEMERGENCY MANAG~MENTPAGENCYD - Si ~21t ( r ~ Q =SanitayManhole _ ~ ~ r,,- 140E L5'~ I iD = Drainage t~anhole >7srs. OAK Q o~'N) Z i i ~„tt' ~ ,9© =.Grease Trap B10Ck COmer vg =Spot Elevation AA SANITARY MH CERTIFlED 70: ~ /t c ~ nOPEEL=2.9~ MAP,Y G R,,AItt INC m >x _ts~p PALM S~~~ tvl LB 670 {{I{ ~ ~ ~ =Centerline CEDAR ~ A ~~~~/.°t~('~ ry ~Z~~~~ S I E -2.88 ~ ~ =Handicap 1k" /'1 ~ { pE~T(P ~0' ~:~VU { ~ ~r, LE.--2.10 _ ~ 4 =Fiaodligh: p ~ = Cleanout ,~y~~ CAMPHOR rrN Disc S 83'38'OQ>' € hP ~ 99.86' h4 ~ ! ~ ~8" ?t/G ~ - I ~ a ParkirL Meter r - - S >~T ~ S * ~ `'r., • ~Brlf 4573 1~p' vin. tarr? ~ ~P) ~ j ~ ~ 4i3 ~ ~ oE,° ~ LGV~iV® ~ 8/ock Corner o I DENNIS J. EYRE, 7HE SURVEYOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE, HEREBY CERTIFY T~FA~ ~ f E - ~ / ~ a { Q THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON AND THAT SAID ABOVE GROUND SURVEY r~"h~f~ •~'r~ FND Disc ;v'c ~Y % (Cj = Calculated Data DMH =Drainage Manhole O.R.. = ofricial Records Book z v ~ a ARE ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNDWLEDGE AND BELIEF. I FURTHER CERTI Ca ~ ~r ; 6 a;- ~ PSM 4573 0~ {{A THAT TH(5 SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS IN SEC110N ~'T~'0~27~ p v, ca. (R1 = P,adial Line E/P = Edge cf Pavemeni OHW = Overhead Wire ~ O ` ' ~ UPDESS SEALEDT WITH AN EMBOSSE SEALG17--6..., F.A.C.) .SURVEY NOT : ~ J k ` e :w c (D}. =Data per Description EL Elevation P.B. Plai Book O 2 y ~ * ~ > - (M4) - Measured Data EOVu = tdge of Water PCP - Permanent Corrtro! Point O ~ , 4, ~ i ~ (Pj =Data per Plat FCIR =Found Iron Rod & Cap PG(s) = Page(sj p ~ a ~ p' ~ ~ 0 P' i - Plus or Minus FCM - Foi;nd Co A;C -Air Conditioner FIR - Fcund Im ncrete Wionument PLS = Professional Lard Surveyor ~ y , a ~ , ~F. b ~ _ n Rod POB = Pour of Beginning z B/OGIC COft'ler Q 2 o B~fl7F - Bartsvire Fence FND N&D Found Nail E: Disc POC Paint of Commencament ~ ;rNp lv&D ' co 6FE =Base Flood Elevation .FOP =Found Open Pipe PP = Power Poie r 4 , ^ S\o~ ` 1B 724D E J. EYRE> P,..S. FLA. G ~l0.28~ p ~ C,'C B = Covered'Concrete Book FPPH = Flou rid Pinched p ~ anhole FUCrF _ Plastic Fent Reference Monument ATE: Joauory 200E r~ri f t y qo t 4 ~ ' ~ ~ CIS = Concrete Siab G.I. =Grate Inlet R = P.adius V s o C/SUd = Concrete Sld°waik GV =Gate Valve RRrJ =Right-of•way" ` i CBS = Conc2te 6(o~k Strucura HYD =Fire Hydrant RCP - =Reinforced Concrete Pipe a -InvertElztation Std&D .=Set Nail&DiscPLS#2855 I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CIP =Cast Iron Pipe LE. - CL = Centerline LE Corporate Certificate Number SIR = Set Iron Rod & Ca PLSe2866 k 2005 A DRAW BY. DATEr December 28, CLF = Chainlink Fence LP Light Pole SMk Sanitar{ Manhole 41 k e Q; C.,--. = Cleanout LFE Lowest Floor Elevation TEM. Temporary Benchmark Q CLP = Concrete Light Po!e M.O L. More or Lest TOE = Top of Bank 1822 D R L V 6j . ST SUITE U o CMF Corrugated Metal Pipe MES Mitered End Section TOS =Toe of Slop 2Q' Conc. Concrete MLP Metal Light Pole UP Utility Pole CHECKED BY. SCALE.' -Delta Angie N!C No Cap , WYF , Wood Fence n ' A1 L f l q FL 33765 , r a in 1 3 D.B. =Deed Book NFNS = Not Found and Not Set WM =Water Meter (('yy 6 GtW =Driveway (NR) =Not Radial WV =Water Valve 3B9t3 SHc'ET 1 C °jD' ONI:> (727; 447-170113 ' .10E No.: L ~p.~y F In 0- o v mm i i:• ~ GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES i z~ . a, 1. The .Landscape Contractor shall --grade -planting-.-beds, : as. required, ..to.:provide,.positive ...drainage .and _pram.ote .optimum plant growth. Z l; 1;1 ~ • DRAINAGE MH j ~ 11 2. All recommended trees and plant materials will be graded os Nursery. Grade No. 1 or better as outlined by the Florida ~ 4 h .Department of Agriculture .and Consumer Services, Division of -Plant Industry "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants", ' TOP EL=4.22 ~Gll 111io, NE LE.=0.14 Q~ ~ 11 7th Edition, 1998 as revised from t'rme_ to time. ~ • ° ~ 11~ / \1n t rBM i ~ ~ 11 # ~ 3. All planting shall be done in accordance with. the Florida Nurserymen's and Growers Associations approved practices.. ~ ~ ,,r FND N&D I o, 11 LB 6928 4. All plants shall be fertilized with Agriform 20-10-5 tablets as per the manufacturers specifications in conjunction with ~ . " EL=4.28 6 SANITARY MH GRA} GRAPHIC SCALE Hate # 5. TOP EL=4.82 / / o N LE.=-3.31 ~ ~ E LE.=-3.01 ~ DRAINAGE MH ~ D " r~-- ~ ~ Asphalt ! ( TOP EL=4.30 o ~o ~ ~ 5. The planting soil .shall be the approximate proportions as follows: 50% sand and 50% organic material consisting of I l votive pent, well-decomposed sawdust, leaf mold and top soil. It shall provide a goad pliable and thoroughly mixed ~ ~ I~ S I.E.=-3.32 ( NE I.E.=-1.43 ~i a 4 I I• W LE•=-3.03 medium .with adequate aeration, drainage- and water-holding capacity. It shall also be free of all extraneous debris, I ~ _ _q 2' Conc: Curb yy Ii^ ~/I SE I.E.=_1.34 Asphalt 1o I I I Q l l SW I•E.- 1.71 SANITARY MH S 259.0' G NW I.E.=-1.62 such as roots, stones, weeds, etc.. ~ , , - II TOP EL=4.45 +i 8'" PAC 1 lI (IN FEET) ~ N LE•=-1.04 =-~~G - __===8„-Pl!C ~.~1/ a 0 s - _ ~ E I.E.- 1.65 ii Conc. & Bnck Paving 1 inch = 20 ft. 6. All planting areas .shall receive a 3" layer of cypress mulch, which is to be watered-in after installation. ' `u~j _ SOUTH BLOCKED i~ III WITH SANDBAGS Ii Asphalt G• III F/ rido Power MH~ 7. The .plant material, schedule. is presented for the. convenience. of the. Landscape. Contractor. In the event of a discrepancy U ,4a; - - - - - between the pion-and the plant key, the plan shall prevail. ~ ' 4 Electric VS SP SC ~ I l ry 11 a ~ 35 27 _Mete I 8. Plants shall meet. size, container, and spacing specifications. Any material not meeting specifications shall be removed Conc. Cur i ~ _ a ~ ,7~,°:.;.;,Fs;.,~ • ,I;;., :,a FND N&D SPREAD and replaced at the contractor's expense. ;;,;,"~.,a • Blocks Corner I 0 ;~r ,,u ~ ' ` Elect is I ~`~'`si''. ^,.~.r .'!k`.,,~si;tt'l~:i..:~~::~. q oo,o II I LB 6707 F"".:,•:c?.'~' ::~:k' Conc Box ^84g. , DRAINAGE MH ~ 6 TOP EL=4.01 9 ~ Cross NE I.E.=-0.79 -------_-6'~w "`'~'":';''i:~°{ Si nos & Bri k Crosswalk ~ ,.~b,:,r;.,w:.:,:` ;t,a~;k;::y, 9 h S LE•=-0.77 a 100, '.bs'~6~1:; :t. w;:.k. wm a 9. The Landscape. Contractor shall be responsible for examining fully both .the site and the bid documents. Discrepancies » » • ; ci C x4 y. " ' FND N&D I in the documents or the actual site- conditions shall be reported to the Landscape Architect 1"1''~~ m wreteng at the time of bedding or discovery. No account shall be made after contract completion for failure to report W " .,n.d+.:G 3 I I 7 1 e ` 6 I I GRATE INLET '~.....~.Op::' • , d LB 5776 I I ~ ' ^ I Not Used II TOP EL=3.32 . ::•::.....::..r'~.•..•.'~~.•.•.•:•ii'r:•i:•i::;•::• I ~ e I ( ) I N LE.=-0.73 ~1 a such condition, or for errors on the part of the Landscape Contractor at the time of bidding. I' (0.06 N, O 1 W) l i ~ ~ S I.E.- 0.66 HEIGHT Lr ht~ II I 10. The Landscape .Contractor shall be responsible for securing all necessary applicable permits and Licenses. to perform N e gin:;:,':.' of I I , M1;'. LOT 56 ` I ~8 Planter I I MULCH 3• FROM sTEMS the work set forth in this plan set and. the. specifications. ~ s:.. I n W I I I MLP ~ ~ 11. Plant material shall be bid as specified unless unavailable, at which time the Landscape Architect W ~ 'S9:v III 3" MULCH LATER. will be notified by in writing of intended changes. ~ ~ 140 I ~ y i':", I d ~ I \ ~ ~ I~ 12. Any and all questions. concerning the plan set and/or specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect Z ~''!i... I a 9" I I •C •C VII \ '1.;+' ~ t°':`:'• ,a ~:,,.:;r' \ \ \ / at {727) 793-9888 ~ ~ A ~ ~ II A5 ,.:k..,,,r; w', I h ° I I v I I FERT1L12ER TABLETS / / / / / c.s / / ~ ~ ' ~ o I SPECIFlED. PLACE UNIFORMLY '_,;'",';i`a';r',.•.~c • - x., I / / / • /v/ / of , I I . I / / \ \ x 13. There shall be no additions, deletions or substitutions without the written approval of the owner. ~ ~ / PREPARED PLANTING SOIL n n ? I 4 AROUND RQOT MASS \ \ \y \ ~ LOT 55 ~ ap I ;'r;. V,,,: ~ II i II BETWEEN MIDDLE AND \ \ \ \ \ 14. The Landscape Contractor shall .guarantee, in writing, plant survivability for a period of twelve (12) months from final ~ ~y ~ iv . ;~,;i;?;4'' I I GRATE INLET I I BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS \ / \ j / ~ acceptance. by the owner.. ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ I TOP EL=2.99 I I ~ CA I to E I.E. 0.28 ° EXISTING UNDISNRBED SOIL 15. All dimensions to be. field-checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to landscape material. installation. Discrepancies shall ~ ^ i ;a,i O' GI f I~ ~ I I 3 TO 5 TIMES WIDTH be reported immediately to the owner. A W pp,,f..~,- M I I OF ROOIBALL I I II GRATE INLET 16. All materials must be as specified on the landscape plan. If materials or labor do not adhere to specifications, they will ~ [-.e I g-, II TOP EL=3.11 SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL NTING DETAIL be rejected by the City Project Manager with proper installation carried out by Landscape Contractor at no additional cost. F.F. = 4.50 j j I I N LE.=-0.59 I LOT 54 I Powerll W INVERT INACCESSIBLE N.T°S. ' I ;4::., I BoxII ~ BOTTOM BOX EL=-0.52 I 17. All permits necessary are to be provided by .the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~:1 G;;: I 18. No contractor identification signs shall be permitted on the project, except for the project information signs. ~ a i L I a`~ I EXI TING A ~L.C1 ' I I ~ 1 ~ • ~ I TO REMAI Q 1 ~ 1 I ~7 ~ I I W ~ U 19. Existing sod shall be removed as necessary to accomodate new plantings. 1 I I j Q~ " 6 1 I a. g,. II I O O C9 5• ~ ~ + anti it I m ~ 20. Ahy existing areas that are disturbed during the landscape installation shall be resodded with St. Augustine ~ LOT 5 P I I Q ~ ~ ~ Au ~ 1 I a~, ~ II m Q `i( ~ ALL SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER "FI017tam". ~ I I ~ ° s ro I 1 Q ~ s~ , 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~-1 , ~ SEF ~ TO BE TRIANGULAR SPAgNG. I J ~ r~ ~ .SEE RLANT IJST.FOR.(O.C.) FACING. 21. The.-Landscape Contractor will be -responsible #or .the collection, removal, ,and proper .disposal of any and all debris generated during. the installation of this project. W a ~a a I y 1 a: V I V LY r~, ~ ,,fit ~ N 1 h °i: ° h • I~ Q ~ a M ~ e O ,N 22. All areas disturbed within right of way shall be sodded. ~ A RI p'I I p ~I h I U • I N L ~ . t~ , 175 N 1 I W. 9" III I ~ Q ~ F ~ ~ ~~C ~ ~ ~ ~ I L T 52 I I ~ t t v ro I r c -1 ~ ~ S I o _ _ O n~ ° I I I I~ 18• MIN. SETBACK FOR SHRUB5 r~r F ~I 5 I I O MLP RI p I ~ ~ 5~ I ZLi ht 25 k GROUNDCOVERS W I, I 1 9 I I G II I 1 r v I I LI I I 1 O.C. SPAgNG IRRIGATION NOTES ~ ~ ~ w BACK OF CURB/ 1. A low volume irrigation .system, that provides. 100% coverage to .all proposed E••e ~ LOT 51 .ya° ~ I! BA I ° ?W I ~ I BE ° ~I~ v BED LINE ~ ~rl I 9 ° I~ A ~TION) plantings, will be designed and .installed by the Contractor. ~ A NO o ° ~ PLANT SPACING DETAIL SECTION) STORMWgTER POND i ~ s" 30 TOB - i 6 - 4.00 I N.T.S. TTOM_ 2.50 2. The proposed Irrigation System must tt~eet ar exceed all applicable City code ~ ~ Ze requirements. (i.e., Back Flow Prevention, Automatic Rain Shutoff Device, etc...) ® w I I 3. Irrigation. system must be inspected and accepted by Landscape Architect ~ o ~ FOP 2 1 2' " • ` ' I •o LOT 50 s ~.1M ''II ~ with Nai! 5~ I o ~ prior to installation of mulch. Irrigation must meet city code section 3-1203.C w ~ tJ ~ Cabe r ` ' 1 I I o 0 to provide .100% coverage, and include a rain sensor and timer. ~ ~ w 83 21'58" h e 4. lrrigation as-built drawings, which accurately and clearly identify all modifications ~ Q z ^ ° ~ LO 64• (Not cluded) 0 (P) a &/or substitutions, must .be submitted .prior to final inspection and acceptance. ~ w ~ c . ~ ° ° ' d ' ~ ° 100.00' 9 a ° a . a.. d (M} .Conc.. ° a I o' o w ~ ~ ~ ° Conc d : 'I I I PRUNE AND TIE FRONDS ADS 4 a v=i 5. The landscape Contractor must coordinate the placement and power supply for the LOT 49 ~ ~ ~ ~ • a . irrigation control timer with the General Contractor. SP LI SOD STORMWAIER POND WITH ^ ~ ° I I o ~ h ° I I 5 2 ST. AUGUSTINE "FLORITAM) ~ z 2 ~ I FND N&D • °o ~ i I LB 6707 FJorrda 6. The following irrigation system components will be utilized, per each manufacturers' Y Y x Y m LOT 5 ro I I 0, 43'S Power MH II ( ) specifications. ~ II FCIR 5 8° 6 I I a Toro-Netafim TechLine~ Self `Cleaning; Pressure=Campensdting Emitter Line / I I LB 6707 I HARDIE - Raindial 6 Station Outdoor. Control Timer ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TBM #2 Richdale - 214APR 1" Electric Valve ~ a a a < a rc ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i SET NAIL II Amtec - 10" Round Valve Box. 3 3 3 3 3 3 aaaaaa = 08 I I EL 4. I l o ~ NA VD 1988 I u U U U U U U w IIQ TRUNK SHALL BE STRNGHT AND I I: WITHOUT CURVES, FREE OF SCARS, NGHT AND o 0 0~ o o O .E OF SCARS, N II^ BURNMARKS AND BOOTS ~ II )TS ~ ~ ~ g U U U U U U ~ m I I ~ N I I ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FND N&D ~ II B 5776 ~ ~ I I TREE REMOVAL wW ~aaa o (Not s I I a o (0.21 'E, D. 02 N) I i ~ $ . ~ ~ W W W W I v3 TREE # SIZE GRADE N N ~ ~ a, Block Corner II ~ ~ SANITARY MH a FND N&D II TOP EL=3.93 ~ ooooao 1 6„ OAK nma~hN Q LB 6707 ~ II N LE.=-2.90 ~ 1 6~~ PALM NM~~oN o ~ II S LE.=-2.88 o II 5~ ~ II W LE•=-2.10 4 14 PALM R/W S 83°38'09" E ^ ~ _ I I 3 16" PALM ~ M~~~ °z FND Disc (M) , ~ ~ L 8„P~c 1 ~ ~ - S PS 4573 00 (p) w,~ 1 18° PALM ~ I O ~ I) W~-N-02N ~ Block Corner °i i l I I 10 TOTAL TREES REMOVED. o r w,-~ FND DISC N'a I 5 LAYERS OF"BURLAP, i I ~ ~ 5 2"x4 x16 WOODEN BATTENS PSM 4573 o m i ~ ~ CONNECTED WITH 2-3/4" STEEL BANDS eP, ~ Q DEN BATTENS, ~ ~~si~~pgmmi~,<<r ~ NO Z~ I - •3/4" STEEL BANDS. L+ , i,~• ~ V~~R ~ ~~~f / ~ r I p v f (0 U! ~i ~ W' Z m ~ 2'X4" WOOD BRACE (3 EA, I _ ~ ~ RAJ [ )OD BRACE (3 EA, MIN.) PLANT LIST ~ Block Corner c NAIL TO BATTENS k STAKES BATTENS k STAKES t FND N&D " LB 7240 (3) 2'x4"xis" W 17 SP Sabal Palmetto Cabba a Palm, 10'-12' C.T. HT.) STAGGERED ~ °4~~ ~ - (3) Yx4"x36" WOODEN STAKES ~ g ( t 3 LI Lagerstroemia Indica, Crepe Myrtle, 2" CAL., 8' ht. ' ~ rA~ r'~~ t~1~ o H' 3 GAL. 24" Ht. (30" O.C. , i -s" saL saucEa aROUND 35 H Hibiscus, ebiscus, , • 11LLED AND LOOSENED 6" SOIL SAUCER \ P TING HOLE. LAN NAl1VE 501L BACKFlLL ~ /\/j\// PLANTING HOLE. 132 VS Viburnum Suspensum, Sandankwa ~burnum~ 3 GAL., 24" Ht., (3' O.C.) ~ ~ , ~ -^3" MULCH LAYER 130 5c 5parnna tiaKen, sana L:orograss - s w{u. RECEIVED ROOTBALL ' 1 I V \ 3" MULCH LAYE . 6 z 30 NO Nerium Oleander, Oleander, 3 GAL., 24" HT. (30" O.C.) 200 RI Raphiolepis Indica, Indian Hawthorn,.3 GAL., 24 HT. (35 O.C.) g FERTILIZER TABLETS E7gSTING UNDIS' AS SPECIFIED. PLACE. \ \ \ \ \ E70STING UNDISTURBED SOIL 0EC 2 ! 2006 DRAWN BY; HAZ UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MASS BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM MIN. 3 TIMES 1HE TH CJiYOIEGDEP'4RiMENT CHECK BY: KEZ CLEAR OF ROOT MASS. OF THE ROOTBALL 02/27/06 WATER ORIGINAL DATE- PALM PLANTING DETAIL HEET SS .T.s N , ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 5 OF 6 ISSUE DATE: 12.14.06 r l U \ Z' 9 5/8„ u Z n.t.s. n•t•s• ~ ~ Cleanout Plug ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ h' Back of Curb Max. 15' -Min. 4' or Connectin Piece w rote tall e t g g Y ~ Fire Hydrant Assembly „ Edge of Pavem n Concrete Pad 4" 10 5/8" U ' 18 Mln. cast Mech. Joint Gland on (Typ.) Thick x 1'-6" Sq. 9 7/8" ~ ~ i 24" Max. one End-D.1. Rotatable Mech. Distance Uaries Valve Box Joint Gland. on Other End. 6" or 8"- 1/8 Bend In Length Varies ~ \ x~~ \ ~ ( e N ote 1) M ~ Q ~ T Plug r~ ~ Valve and H Brant Tee Y (See Note) w/D,I. Rotatable Mech. Joint ~ Gland on Plain End Branch. 0 Mech. Joint , 8 ~ ~t o ~ ~ Valve ~ uJ o ti ~ ~ ~ I Sewer Maln 13 1 /2 Z ~ ~ P, N ~ Mech.. Joint Valve ~,w~ Z ~ ~ ~ ONLY APPROVED I-- W x Kennel Guardian No. K-81A CLEANOUT PLUG D ~ ETA L ~ > Y . ' Muller Centurion No. A-423 CLEANOUT DETAIL ~ ~ Water Main U.S. PI e Metro olitan N.T.S. P P N.T.S. NOTE: Cleanout plug to be t` NOTES: NOTES: I 1. On Hydrants Requiring Runout Restraining Joint (Typ.) U.S. Foundry 7621 ~ W or equal. ~ 1. Steamer Connection to Face Street. Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained - CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 2. All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1/4 Valve Seat. PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS. ADMINISTRATION FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ',Z, ~ IISTRATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~ 3. Fire H drants Shall be Placed at Street Corners ENGINEERING ENGINEERING y REDRAWN BY DATE REDRAMN BY D TE or in the R.O:W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines Bvp TYPICAL HYDRANT o~ i5 s2 B.V.D. TYPICAL HYDRANT o1 15 'ANT D ~ Awn Br STANDARD 11 0 95 Q, A 01 15 92 I e. CHECKED BY SETTING INDIX ND, ~ CHECKED Br SETTING Whenever Possib c.c.H. CROSS-SECTION 402 IND~r>S~Ic PLAN VIEW INDE>sN0 (NECKED BY CLEAN OUT INDEX No. ~ i 4uYY _ W.J.S. Sanitar 304 O 4. See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections 8c _Fiftings. REV. DATE DESCRIPTKIN ppp, DESIGNED eY 2 of 4 REV DATE DESaaPT10N APP, ~aHEO BY 3 OF T.C.J. G,C.H. 3 OF 4 eEV. DAZE DESaaP110N App, APPROVED BY 1 or 1 T.C.J. w 00 oooa 0 0 0 00 oooa a 0 0 0 Flow Z W 0 0 0 Tapped Flange ~ Brass Nipples 2" Backflow ~ Tapped Flange ~ ~ NOTES: Ball Valve ~ f ~TyP~) f Preventer ~ ~ Ball Valve ~ 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W, APPROX. 4 FT. BACK OF CURB O o ~ UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. To View 90' Brass EII 90' Brass EII ~ ~ . P 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE Approved Backflow ~ BYPASS DETAIL W a SHEET N0. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION: DRIVEWAYS Ford Meter Flange Prevention Device (Flanged) o' U a SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. Approved Backflow _ Preventer ~ 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED and PRESSURE TESTED TEST FOR ONE HOUR ®150 P.S.I. ( ) Resilient Seat Plate. Strainer Resilient Seat UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL- COMPLETION OF -THE Ford Angle OS & Y Valve ~ ~ OS & Y Valve Valve Flan ed TESTING and CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. ( 9 } Flow Flanged Tee Flanged Tee 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. 5. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL .SERVICE `CONNECTIONS TO 4" PVC MAINS. SADDLE IS „ . ~ Flanged 90' Bend ~ ~ Flanged 90' Bend REQUIRED FOR 2 SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 6 .and LARGER PVC MAINS. LARGEST. SERVICE , " " a d LARGEST TO ANY.MAIN IS 2". CONNECTION TO A 4 MAIN IS 1 1 /2 n 000 0 o aoo Uniflange „ Brass Nipple 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36 . Meter MeterY f ~ Q Flan ed ( 9 ) Threaded Cor ordtion Sto Curb Sto ~ O ~ p p p ~ L MUELLER H15008 MUELLER.. H14350 with Lock Wln and ~ 12 f D,l. Pipe a 9 0 or approved equal - ~ ~ E a~ Compressl~n Inlet or approved :equal o ~ I w H (Tap at 45° Angle) ~ i w 12„ Supports ~ ~ Q v i I~ ~ Saddle if Re wired q See Note 5 M:J, 90' Bend M.J. 90' Bend ~ ~ ~ HI Water Service Tubin 9 Flow ~ ~ ~ Drisco i e 5100 or Endot Yardle " " pP ~ Y . ~ TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE 1 1 2 and 2 MODELS TYPICAL COMPOUND WATER METER SET ~ ~ ' ' Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene, ® ~ I~-~ NOTE: n.ta. ~ w .Saddle shall have double X, , ~ NOTE: 1. 0 S & Y Valve Handles will be Chained and Locked. ~ o ~ stainless steel straps Device must be Installed Ievei. 2. Meter Sets will be Painted After Installation. with a ox coated P Y 3. Bypass Pipe & Fittings Shall be .Threaded Brass. w a ~ FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ ~ w ductile iron bod . CITY of CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Y PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION Water Main ENGINEERING ~ APPROVED R.P. DEVICES ~ APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES ENGINEERING IISTRATION ~ APPROVED R.P. DEVICES * APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION z ° ~ REIXtAwN eY DATE Herse -Beeco Model FRP II Herse -Beeco Model FDC RED BY TYPICAL METER SETS W DA I ENGINEERING a Horse Beeco Model 6CM Horse Beeco Model No. 2 ~ ~ Z ETS W DA Y Y REDRAWN BY TYPICAL COMPOUND DA ~ ~ B.V.D. 01 15 92 Y Y 02 9~ aEV. WATER SERVICE glEafED BY WATER MAIN SERVICE INp~X No. Watts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or 007 CHEa~ED BY BACKFLOW PREVENTERS INTERS 02 s4 Ames 5000 S5 Ames 2000 SS MJP o2 s4 W, ~ w INDE1INO. Watts Madel 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or D07 CHECI(ED eY WATER METER SET IND a. ~ ~ _ 1 12/22/94. 1UBING TYPE ~ 401 b INDEII NC DESIGNED BY CONNECTION DETAIL Con taco 40200 Conbraco 40100 BY 1 1 2 and 2 MODELS 405 REV, DALE DESCRIPRDN APP. 1 OF $ _ REV, DATE OESCRPitON APP, 2 OF IODELS Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 DAtE DESCraPnoN DESarED BY 90' RISE. a a ~ 20F5 ~ 3Of5 See Index No, 201 m Y 4 Varies TYP CAL 1/AL1/E SETT N G Clay Or Cement Brick Masonar THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: na.s. Q At Terminal y L BEND -INLET AND OUTLET 3 o: Manhole 2. TEE -OUTLET BRANCH 0 3. OFFSETS -INLET AND OUTLET v rn Q 4. CAPS r 5. PLUGS \ m ~ ~ 6. DEAD ENDS ° ° z o: / ~ Bottom Of ~ 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS ' / 'x 3 o A 3 A Corbel ~ N ~ U ~ Adjustable ~ W w ~ „D„ Min; ~ ~ -Valve Box ~ ~ ~ ~ ij ~ 8" 8" L Megalug Restrainer (Typ.) Or To Suit Pipe ~ „ ~ `o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 12 12 ~ ~ ~ ~ gU „E„ When Valve Occurs in Roadway, is o N o set Base on 10-Common Brick: I ~ C w ~ N Z N ~ m 6 ' 3 ~ ~ Ebba 1500 Series (Typ.) ~ o:w>-w-ozrn • ~ S u o•,, ~ ~ ~ 0 are Bottom •'Q:' ,,~d:~• .~4;,.0• a• .4 ~ a Permitted ~ ~ ,~~~li~~i 0 PLAN .SECTION. A-A , N ON ALL TEES, A MININUM OF 5 SHALL BE 0 ' *N' ~~~'r~o ' : `~'w, RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG L =MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE ~ S ~ A B C D E F G RE TRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (Ft.) ~ ~ Water Main e ~ ~ ~ ~ Shallow 0'- 4' 2'-6" " FIGURES BASED ON 30 DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. v 4 Max 3 6 24 Max 8 #3 at 12 E.W. 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM o~ E _ Mech. Joint. Valve ~ ~ ~ . N Standard 4.1'- 6' 3'-6" 6~ NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE E Max 4 30 Max 8 #5 at 10 E.W. Restraining Joint a~ ~ ~ 'RAINY e W Dee 6,1'- 10' 3'- " BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT p 6 7 10 4 48 Max 12 #5 at 10 E.W. BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 „ NOM. ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE r ~ ~~~~Qi i . , o Deep 10.1 - 14 3 -6 7 14 5 48 Max 12 #5 at 10 E.W. TEES DEAD RESTRAINERS. PIPE Y~ ~ ~ ~~~'~I~~,+1+'++C~C'~,` " o BRANCH END SIZE 11.25 22.50 45 90 U - _ ~ m~ N CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA NOTES 4 2 4 9 21 28 46 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ,FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA DRAWN BYc HAz GIIRIIt, IdIADIfC A11?IIAIICTDATIf1Al MUM WUKKS AUMINI51MIUN 1. All concrete to be 3000 p.s,i., ENGINEERING 6 3 6 12 29 47 65 ENGINEERING II5IKAIIUN YUISLIL; WUKIW AUMINIZIIKAIIUIV ENGINEERING CHECK BY; KEZ with fiber mesh reinforcing Pi A"o' BY DAB REDRAW BY Are STORM SEWER a 00 8 4 8 16 38 66 85 B.V.D s oz s 1 4/9/02 Rw. No1n R.O. CHEC WAS. KED BY IND2DD(2N0. CHECKED BY THRUST INDEX NC 9 02 99 REDB.V D. BY. VALVE 01 D~5 92 ORIGINAL DATE; 02/27/06 INDEX NO. CHECKED BY SETTING INDEX NO. E MANHOLE DETAIL 403 a REV. DAZE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED BY OF REV. DAZE DESCRIPTION App. DESIGNED BY RESTRAINING 1 1 Z D.G.B. G.C.. 1 OF 2 1432 REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DESIGNED G.C.H. Y CROSS-SECTION 1 0 24 SHEET c 0 D ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 6 OF 6. ISSUE DATE: 12.14.06 r 1 INSIDE , . OUTO • , ~ GROUP >N~. J . . 812 LOUDEN AVEN~JE... • ; DUN$DIN, FLORIDA`....; ~ • 34698 (727) 7343673 " ~ I I I ` . ' ~ ~ ~ BALCONY; ~ • { BALCONX' • i i ~ I ' I i 1" LINE of . . , I BALCONY. I ABOVE. I i I . . I " I I I I I 1 ~ ~ I I. ~ ~ ~ I . ~ I i . I j i ~ I t i'' i _ i I i LIVING RpB$RT M •WEI1bIER: • I. I. I , , , ; ~ .:ARCHITECT ;.#2955 • ,i ~ • ' ' ' I I _ ' 1 , . , 'I `-lU~j • I , ; -10 • , I . , I r---------------- ~ r-- ~ ~ ~ ;i ~ I i ~ I. I I DII~iING i . ~ DINING . ; • . ~ ~ • . . BALCOI'~Y • ~ KITCHEN ~ I BALCO ~ 1 _ I I i .KITCHEN I I , , o - I , ~ ~ . ® o - I ~ LB1E OF BUIl.DBVO ABOVE i ~ p ' i ~ ~ ~ , _ I ~ ~ I I~ , ~ i I i ~ ~ i i ' • LIVII~(G ~ . _ ~ , r , ~ 1 ~ M ' I i , i ~ ' . ~ ' RETAIL 41350 S . FT, . , p 1 , 4 ' S-0 x.10 ~ ` i s~;On'' :6 . , O , . i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i i i I ~ 1 ' :r r-- I ~ , 1 I I I ~ ~ -.DINING ~ ~ ~ • I - ~ N DINING ~ I , I, ,,I i i i N I ? ' i ~ ; ~ KTfCIB3N I Q ; i BEDROOM I12 iv ~ KITCHEN ` i'' i ~ ; BEDROOM #2 ~ h i i ~ LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE... ; i ~ i ~ I ~ J j ~ I' ~ ~ i.------- i : i ® ~ I ~ ~ 0 i I 1 , t I i - ` ~ I, 1 i ~ ~ i _ 1, ,I , 11 ~ i • ' i I. ~ , A,. I ; , I M I MASTER . I . ~ . MASTER ~ ; , . BEDROOM i BEDROOM #3 . . , I .I I I BEDROOM . ~ BEDROOM #3 ' . : I I I a ~ I, • I o © ; ~ " i 'NOTE: f , i ~ ~ ~ ~ r" ; , , ~ . ~ i 1 © ' ' i THE VERTICAL HEIGHTCLEARANCE - i I ~ ' ' . • ~ I ~ ® I I ~ ~ ,i , , I FOR COVERED PARKING SHALL BE A i °-J I ~ O® ' 1 I MINIMUM OF 8'-2"FROM THE GROUND I ' ~ , , $EDROOM #Z TO THE LOWEST OVER HANGING I i BBDROOM #2 i STRUCTURE: I ~ TRAVEL TRAVEL • , ~ , ~ DISTANCE I ' I` DISTANCE 12'-0.. • ~ ~ 9S'-I" a ~ • ~ ~ i • • I I. I i . ~ Q I . ~ ~ I i ~ t~ • , _ ' i ' O I I _ I I 1 ~°-n I , ' ELECTRICAL I I MASTER . i I i ~ BEDROOM ~ BEDROOM #3 BBDROOM ~ 3 ~ BEDROOM#~ • ~ ~ LOCATIONS . SCREEN • • ~ , I I I II T I EVEI. 2ND LE < `DITMPS ) 3RDLE I , TRAVEL. (O R) , I - - TRAVEL w ~ t7 _ DISTANCE 93'-1" ' Va p.... ~ DISTANCE 93'•I" ...._r,.~_---__ I I I I I 7-4. I ~~-4„ LOBBY I I I ~ LOBBY ~ .mom I I I I I. I~ ~1 I I $ # 1 I S Ml I • g ' ~ A I LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE 0 I i i V ~ i ~ I I - - i 88'-6°' 8$'-6" . _ od A : - . - o ~ • . o ~ ~ . . • a~ ~ ~a • . ~ : a w u . ' _ • ' SCALE :3/32" =1'-0" 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR PLANS . • vlsloxs SCALE : 3132" =1'-0" . ' SCALE : 332" =1'-0" - • UJEBt UNIT lT1'PIC,4L) . • .....::.:.:.2425 SF - . 1~IYINCx CONpItION~D . • LLUINCx UNCONDITIONED 334 S~ : ' • TOTAI~ AREA :..:......•2759• SI= ~ • - , DRAWN BY CP Eft UN1t l1"rPIG~41~) DATE.. LIYINC~ CONDItION~D 251: SI= 14vecemtier2oo6,. ~IYINC~ UNCONDITIONED 3~1 SF : - TOl'AL AREA :.:...::2888 5F' ' , . , EAST UNIT (FIRST LEVEL ONLY) r . LIVING CONDITIONED 25171.5F. LIVING'UNCONDITIONED 2203 51= Q TOTAL AREA 471,0 5F . L OF3 : - ' • : . . I ' ~ , : • , . . NSI I . ~ E • :OUT 0 • I . • . GROTrJP IN~.~ „ - 812 LOUDEN AVENUE . . . D ' _~~~--------------------i . ~ ~ , tJNEDIN, FLORIDA • I• ' I . : ~ . 34698 • I I ' 1 I ' I I ,(727)734-3673 ; 1 BALCONY ~ ~ I BALCONY , 1 : I I _ . I J . - ~ ~ I I I 1 II • I ' I 1 I • _ , I I , . I I - . 1 . I I I I I f I LIVING ; ~ I LIVING I I I.. ~ 1 I I .I I , I . I ROBERT M: WEIMER I I '-10" 6 I ~ ARCHITEC°f :#2955 I • , I ~ '-10" , . ~ „ I '-1011 . I "I ~ - I ,1 _ i ~ , . 1 1 • ~ I _ 1 DINING ~ PERGOLA DINING ~ I I PERGOLA. i ' • ~ ~ I I • M I KITCxEN ' , z 1 ' j - I I is 0 ~ I .I C I I . I; 1 I ~ , I I ® Q . i 1 I I I p 1 ~ ~ ~ - 1 I I 1 ~ ~ I. I I,, I I I I I I I : I , ~ I ~ ~ I I 1 I _ I - M ; ' 1A • I . I ' I I I I I I I I, I ® I I C9 U -I • j I POOL ® , I - --T POOL . ~ I.\ ill ~ 1 _ _ < ~ - ' I I POOL I _ I _ _ ' ~ I ~ i r------- ~ ~ fir, ; , I Lri Y ~ i ~ I • BEDROOM#2 i I BEDROOM#2 ~ i. I -i i i I i ~ o ~ i I . I t I I I I M I ~ 0 i~ i ~ .I ~i I ~ - ~ I I I • - - i I. i I - ~ I I I • , 4 I I~ t( ~ ~ II j , I 1 I ' _y I ~ - 'MASTER I I I I ~''I ~ I . HANDI APPED ,BEDROOM : ~ ` , BEDROOM#3 MASTER; ~ _ • _ LIFE - ~ BBDR00~ ~ BEDROOM ~3 I ,I fI O I ~ UP ~ ~ I ti r H I -I ~ ! I i 4~ • . - TRAVEL. ~ - ' i ' DISTANC~? . _ - - - ~ 12'-0" . ..-..J- i J ~ 95'-1° I--. - . --i DISTANCE ~ ~ ~ 951,11 I II ' I I ' I ~ I~f . COMMONS AREA ~ ' CO ONS A CO ONS A ; ~ ' ,,I I I, 1. I I I I 1I I I I I I - I I I I - I I I I 1 I II• • I I I I I I I I I I ' ~ I I - I I • BATHR M . I I • I ,i i • l I , I. I I I I STORAG I. ' r ------1 ~ELEVATb ' I STORAG I rl CHANI_i I_ F\__ I i ii I~~ Iii I I : LINE OF - • -BALCONY i. I LOBBY ~ III. ~IBI . ~~-A~~._ ~ ~ r ~ III ABOVE I 1 1. LOBBY 7 -4 . I, Y BBY .Ira.: ___°J iii ~ S ' I STAIIt#2 ~ I it ll. S2~ I I •'ll ~ , .u.~ Imo.-s.3.~•~ I I i 01~y' Z . ~ • ~ i ji' II1ilIIII ii A~j I ~~c ~f fi® I.IIIIIII11111il,'Fi.~ I I I I I II1 I I I I I II O r 0,,. • 7T-6" - - U ~ ' , 771,[11 ~ • • . ~ • w • o : o . a w .v ROOF PLAN : SCALE : 3J32" =1'-0" SCALE ; 3132° = 11-011 _ SCALE : 3132" =1'-0" . . ' ' R$VISIONS • ' . DRAWN BY . , Cp ~ DATE.:.. 14 December 2006 ' 2OF3 i ' 1 ' TOP OF HIGHEST POINT. ~ f~ _ ~ , ' MONIER ~ MADEIItA BLEND °DURON° "RUSTICATED. : 1 • ARCADE... . ~ r ~ CLAY BARREL ~ ~ ' • • , , , f, WHITE M~~ STUCCO . TOP OF ROOF ' ' ' • t ~ "DURON" #7100. ~ ~ • ' 1 . ARCADB , • MID OF RObF ~ , WHITE #7100 MID OF ROOF • , 87.8 N.A.V,D. ' . ~INS•IDE ' , . ~ - ~1, ~ ~ - + .t' MONIER ~ QUT •O ' MADEIRA . T T1~ aLErm CLAY ~ ~Ti~o U r nvc. • s~ BARREI: TILE 1 ARCADE , ' , ~ ~ ~ ' ~ . ' 77 -0 N.A.V.D. VVEII'I'B • #7100. , • 812 LOUDEN AVENiI$ DECORATIVE TRIM • • PAINTED ARCADE , ~ DUNEDIN, FLORYDA • WHITE 7100 ~ 34698 • • • , • (727) T34 3673 , , N. , ARCADE ~ ~ 5.' • , , . • , , WHITE'; • , ~ COLUMN , ' ' ' ' ' #7100 + ~ . , , B a PAIIVTED ARCADE ~ • 4 , ~ ~ 55'-8" A V D ~ , ~ , ~ N. , • . RUSTICATED RESTRAINED 1•' . ' . ~ STUCCO GOLD SW 1•'' . ~T~ ' 'r 5 "DURONII ~ ~ ~ IVOIRE SW ~ °DURON' ~ 6129 ~ • , N • 6127' z;, .,ROBERT M, WEI11~R ' ~o ARCADE • ~~~~~71~1[} i. ~ ~ • ~ ~ ARCHITECT ..:#2955 , DURON A 45-0 NIA,V.D. X7100 1 , , RESTRAII~EU ~ • , (TOLD SW 6129 DURON' 0 ~ , • ' D ALUMINUM •.f ~ jam; RAI[.INO IIDURON' TOPAZ. ~ u ~t WH1TE . , • SMOKEY 34'-4" A V D ' ; , ~ • . sw 6u7 ~ N. , ' ' ' TOPAZ SW 6117. "DURON" • • . SMOKEY • . . • . • • , • • ~ TOPAZ SW , 1 ~ - ' 61.1.7 • • , ~ , . ' • ~ , • , SMOKBY 0 • TOPAZ SW 6117 RUSTICA . ~ STUCCO • S G SIGN SIGN SIGN ~ SIGN B.F.E. -12.0 _ ~ ~ ~ t B.F.E. =12 -0 - -~o - OPEN . `4 ~ ~ \ / GRADE = 4'-6" ~ i GRADE = 4'-6" ~ ; , _ , . ~ J ~ _ . 1 r " ' SCALB c 332" =1'-0" SCALE M'J/JYrll'= 11 /yll ~ -V , _ - • ? MONIER MADEIRA BLEND ' CLAY BARREL TILE , ~ _ ' , . . , ~ ~ MONIER MADEIItA TOP OF ROOF • • i . ' BLEND CLAY . . . BARREL TILE , MID OF ROOF 'i i. "DURON" . • VINYL RESTRAINED:' WRAPPED - OOLD SW 6129 FASCIA ~ .r WHITE j • ~ "DURON"ARCADE 5.~ _ ~ f. •!u~.. , . . 1 /i ! , . . COLUMN 1 ' ' , w ~ • . PAINTED ~ • ~ ~ ' ARCADE . • WHITE M #7100 ~ , r • , . 4 M _ ~ ALUMIIVUM' ~ ~ .'I,' , t Q RAILING ~ ~ , "DURON' RESTRr ~ , .1 f • • , WHITE , OOLD 3W 6129 0°0 ~,o• r DECORATNE TRIM 1, ; ' , , ~P~A~I}N~TpErD ~yA,RCADE Q ' 1~~ [~W/]" n; ~ ALUMINUMRAILI ' ' , , i ' , ~ ~ti 4.•. . • r: • , "DURON" • . o x 0` ~ o RESTRAINED ~ ~ . 1, 1 ~ OOLD SW . ' • i 6129 ~ ; . ~I , ; • , • ~ • ~ RUSTICATED REVISIbNS • . • STUCCO.. ' 4 . . 4 ~ • ' I', 1. ' ' 5 • 1~ ~ STUCCO BAND t ~ ~ ARCADE W[iITE 1 ~ ~ ~ ' • #7100. ~ ~ ~ h. ~ ~ • "DURON" • 1, t SMOKEY ~ t B.F.E. =12'-0" ~ • • , • ~ ~ DRAWN BY CP _ TOPAZ B,F,E =12 -0 Y, h y" SW 6117 ~ ~ . ~ OPEN OPEN ' ~ ~ , • ' . ~ . ~ " DATE ` 14 December 2006 . , - ~ •:OPEN .,OPEN ' ~ OPEN. • ~ OPEN • % • GRADE = 4'-6" , ~ . wA T NORTRELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 1 , SCALE : 3/32" =11-0SCALE: 3132" = P-Y' .3 .OF 3