Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2006-02009
0 } Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ?? Lr t ?- CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Marv G Realty, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 490 Mandalay Ave. Clearwater FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-847-8158 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Marv G Realty, Inc.; Go Nick Gionis (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zayac P.E.. RLA c/o Keith Zavac & Associates Inc MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road East Ste 404, Safety Harbor FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: keith(c-okeithzayac com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 490 Mandalay Ave LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment A (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 PARCEL SIZE: 040 acres 17 457.56 SF (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 12 Residential Condominium Units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment B Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) V DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) )Pdl SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Attachment C 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment C 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: See Attachment D Y f ?r E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that inv addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemf to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the CityfnanuSi Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. P:6-, COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable bz_ Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ?4 SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic enginoee i principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ?? W-. GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared, Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; 9 9 Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701), Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ._, SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights, Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'%X 11) and color rendering if possible;. ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: - One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; - Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwaler management for the parcel; - All open space areas, Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; _ Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: - All existing and proposed structures; - Names of abutting streets; - Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations, - Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers, Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/ X 11) (color rendering if owisible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. • 0 I." BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown [Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infll Project. -IRf BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ??.._ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) S0T?Ih ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs, Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'h X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of rransportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. "-Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. x Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNA I, the undersig application are authorize City descries in thi Signatu cknowledge that all representations made in this and accurate to the best of my knowledge and >entatives to visit and photograph the property cation. I rty b,hner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ;worp to and subscribed before me this ,31-151 day of f t,Z/'uo_ A.D. 20Q?, to me and/or by /V, CZ 4 C) n:r who is personally known has produced 4., c,-? as identiflcatio cK-l - /-1 Notary. blic, My ceAmission expires: MY COMMISSION n DD354601 EXPIP.ES September 13, 2008 BONDED THOU TGOY FAIN WSUGA.NCF., INC AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Mary -Realty, Inc.- J` (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1 . That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 490 Mandalay Bay 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Construction of a 12 unit condominium project with associated parking 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: -- ----- Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to c nsider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to cess this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6 That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foreqoing is rue a d correct.( ?E Property ner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS efore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of GEj?uq ZOCXo personally appeared /fir a/G ?n on If who having been first duly sworn Deposes nd says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public My Commission Expires: ' *= MYCOMMISSION# DD354601 EXPIRES September 13, 2008 .1oNUEDiHRU TROY FnInI INSLIRA NCf,, INC S:lPlanning DeparimenhApplication Forms ldevelopment reviewVlexible development application 2005.doc • 0 ATTACHMENT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 57 THROUGH 63 INCLUSIVE AND THE NORTH 10.25 FEET OF LOT 64, CLEARWATER BEACH PARK, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 42, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. a • ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Increase in height from 35 ft to 82'-5" ft from FEMA to midpoint of roof. • Reduction in front (north and east) setback from 15 feet to 0 feet to trash staging area and pavement. ATTACHMENT C GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The Applicant proposes a 12-unit residential structure at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. The proposed height is 82.5 feet. Most parking will be within the fully-enclosed parking garage. The architectural theme is Mediterranean. Existing use of the property is commercial with 6,254 square feet of units, one of which is a restaurant.. How will this development be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties? The entirety of the properties surrounding this development which have been approved and are in the process of development include: Sand Pearl with three major structures, one to the north being a 253- room project with a height of 95 feet, and the other two being to the west and south with a high-rise residential building of 150 feet and a low-rise of 48.5 feet; the Pelican to the east on the easterly side of Mandalay Avenue now being retail has been approved for four stories of parking and an additional three floors of 28 residential units, the height to be 70 feet; Belle Harbor on the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street has two towers of 99 feet and 130 feet. This development will be an upscale condominium product with upgraded architectural finishes and textures including barrel tile roofs, extensive balconies and building deflection. Clearly, this development will nestle easily among and be in harmony with the development of the surrounding properties. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. This development is consistent with the existing surrounding land uses and with the re-development of other adjoining properties. As discussed above, this development, within the Tourist District, is surrounded by High-rise structures. The existing strip of commercial property which has long existed in this location will be demolished being replaced with this condominium with street-level amenities for the walking public. Setback requirements are met or exceeded except in the case of a trash staging area where the dumpsters are temporarily moved on collection days. The quality- of this development will complement those projects already approved. A development which is like those with which it will exist can not impair value. • t 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 12 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature and replaces the existing retail development. There are no proposed uses other than residential that would have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The parking is designed mostly within a parking garage and uses only one 24-foot wide driveway. The existing parallel parking spaces along Mandalay Avenue are retained. The proposed 24 on-site parking spaces meet the Code's required parking spaces. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The surrounding parcels along Mandalay Avenue and Baymont include recently approved multi-family developments with similar Mediterranean style architecture and height. The proposed development seeks to maintain the same up-scale character of the new projects colors, character, size and bulk. 6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage. The project only contains 12 residential units, and will not include any commercial or other businesses with extended hours of operation. 0 0 ATTACHMENT D APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE SPECIFIC LAND USE TO WHICH THE WAIVER IS REQUESTED Height: a: The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design 'and appearance. The increase in height from 30 feet to 82'=5" allows far the construction of the 12 units (30 units per acre) to be constructed without reducing building setbacks or pavement setbacks. The proposed setbacks on several sides are substantially larger than required, allowing for an increase in open space and landscaped areas surrounding the building. The site plan is also improved by the elimination of the driveways along Mandalay Avenue and reduction of total driveways to one proposed entrance on Baymont Street. The increase in height also improves the building fagade by allowing significant relief and balconies along all sides of the building while still providing market driven unit sizes. The increased height also allows additional area for landscaping. b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parting on the groundfloor ofthe residential building. The building utilizes the first floor of the residential building to provide enclosed on-site parking which exceeds the required 2 spaces per unit. The parking garage is fully enclosed and the fagade designed to resemble the remainder of the proposed residential units.. The access to the property has been reduced from the two current driveways an Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street to one full access on Baymont Street. This will reduce the access points along Mandalay Avenue, being a major throughfare. Lot Area and Width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The lot area of 17,457.56 sf exceeds the minimum lot area of 10,000 sf and does not require a reduction request. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street. The existing driveways accessing Mandalay Avenue will be removed and replaced by one driveway on Baymont Street, which is not classified as an arterial street. Off-street parking: a. Ae physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage of other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level faVade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level: The proposed project provides 25 parking spaces in the first floor of the building. This exceeds the City requirement of 2 spaces per units or 24 spaces total. Therefore a request for a parking reduction is not part of this submittal. It is noted however that the location of the project along Mandalay Avenue allows for convenient access to the Trolley and public bus system. In addition, the area is convenient to local restaurants, shops and stores by foot thereby reducing the dependency on vehicular transportation. The proposed parking is screened by the first floor building walls from street view. The walls are shown on the colored renderings to be constructed from the same materials as the remainder of the building and painted Smokey Topaz to match other elements of the residential portion of the building. There are also several windows along' the first floor that match the residential windows above. ATTACHMENT D BEACH BY DESIGN GUIDELINES A. The gross density of residential development shall not exceed 30 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development includes 12 units on 0.40 acres, or a density of 30 units per acre. B. ..&Iaximum height is prescribed by the respective zoning districts in the Community Development Code unless otherwise restricted by Beach by Design. The height may be increased however to one hundred fifty feet. The proposed building height is 82'-5". There are no portions of the building at or above one hundred and fifty feet. C. Design Scale and Mass of Building 1. Buildings with a footprint of greater than 5, 000 sf or a single dimension of greater than one hundred feet will be constructed so that no more than 2 of the 3 building dimensions are equal in length. The building overall length is 121'-8" along Mandalay Avenue and 64'- 10" along Baymont Street. The fagade is broken up into three horizontal planes with dimensions of 59'-0", 15'-8" and 47'-0". Vertically, each floor is broken up with balconies and aluminum rails. Therefore no more than 2 of 3 building dimensions are equal in length and no horizontal plan extends more than 100 ft without interruption. 2. No plane of a building may continue uninterrupted for greater than one hundred linear feet (100 ). The building is divided by relief on the east and west sides of the building by relief greater than 5 ft. The maximum uninterrupted horizontal fagade is approximately 60 feet in length and divided vertically by balconies and rails on each floor. The maximum uninterrupted horizontal fagade on the west side of the building is approximately 92'-0". 3. At least 60% of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. Included within this package are full size and reduced color renderings of the building elevations showing windows, sliding glass doors, aluminum railings, bands, balconies, rusticated stucco, stucco bands, and trim which exceed this requirement. 4. No more than sixty percent of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above forty-five feet will be occupied by a building. The maximum theoretical building envelope located above forty-five feet is calculated as 11,197.82 s.f. x 37.42 ft high = 419,022.42 cu-ft. The project design building envelope is calculated as (6,760.00 s.f. x 15 ft high) + (1000.00 s.f. x 22.42 ft high) = 123,820 cu-ft or 29.50% of the maximum. 5. The height and mass of buildings will be correlated to: (1) the dimensional aspects of the parcel proposed for development and (2) adjacent public spaces such as streets and parks. The building was designed to correlate to the size of the parcel so as not to request any building setback reduction requested. In fact, the building setbacks substantially exceed those required by code along Baymont Street and the adjacent parcels to the west and south. D. The area between the building and edge of the pavement as existing and planned should be sufficiently wide to create a pedestrian friendly environment. The distances from structures to the edge of pavement should be 15 feet along arterials and 12 feet along local streets. A ten , foot pedestrian path is key to establishing a pedestrian friendly place. The pavement and building setback along Mandalay Avenue (arterial) is maintained at 0 feet minimum to incorporate a public information platform and public seating areas, and the setback along Baymont is maintained at 15.0 feet minimum. The existing sidewalk recently constructed along Mandalay Avenue is being maintained, and the existing driveway eliminated. E. Street-Level Facades The building entrances, in particular the main entrance off of Mandalay Avenue, will be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. The entrance on Mandalay Avenue will be set apart from the sidewalk with pavers. A glass tower at the entrance and awnings in particular locations on the street will be provided. F Parking Areas The parking areas are separated from the public rights of way by the building wall along Mandalay Avenue and by opaque landscape treatment including hedges, small trees and palms along Baymont Street. The landscaping proposed is consistent with surrounding public and. private uses to minimize excessive leaf, flow or seed droppings on vehicles. The parking garage is screened from view by the fagade of the building, which is designed to blend into the residential portion of the building and not be readily apparent. . s G. Signage Signage will reflect the development in this area of Beach by Design known as the Destination Resort District. H. Sidewalks Sidewalks which will abut the City sidewalks in combination with City walkways will provide an inviting pedestrian friendly area that will include landscaping to provide shade, pergolas, benches, and planting areas. 1. Street Furniture and Bicycle Racks See H above. J. Street Lighting Street lighting as necessary would be provided within the parameters of Beach by Design. K. Fountains A ten foot (10') diameter water feature surrounded by seating will be provided. L. Materials and Colors Per the submitted color chips, the building fagade maintains a Florida Mediterranean style with Monier Madeira clay barrel tile roofs along with a mixture of Restrained Gold, lvoire and Arcade White building fayade colors. There are no bright colors or glass curtain walls associated with the project. so RE: Gionis by the Sea 490 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, FL 33767 Area of ouenina calculations N August 10, 2006 Direction Facade sf R uired Proposed Fast 10,494 sf 6,296 sf 6,500 sf North Well over 60% South Well over 60% West 10,651 sf 6,390 sf 6,525 sf Our calculations include but are not limited to: doors, windows, railings, banding, rustification, brackets, columns, and trim. ORIGINAL RECEIVED p jr, 112006 PLANNING DEPARTNIEN' CITY OF CLEARSJLR l' DROP AL ALL DRIAES l? R Y.EARKG 9XIFACE GRAPHIC SCALE Z C .I ° 1 i m.?ro ltt IL1 L _ BASE - 4 +em ?'? m ~ - COMPACTED . Q t 4 -) i-","-• w• ••1 f"Xt 6-. wed+ADE LEGEND Tr4 T- - ?{ t T-L L i f? A/•';? _.._..?.._ PRa.ECr BOUNOM+r L F •- --I ? - -1 ' i .? STRAIGHT CURB _ mE c EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOAm F w 90. aXA A 9 [fi LFOPOSED CONCRETE PA4FMENi ~ 4 l a la. BAYMONT STR fFET_ GENERAL NOTES; Al - *5 1. ENOINEERAAMDSGAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH 2AYAC d -COATES. INC. ??• -07 ypx? r1' )Oi ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST. SUITE 401 (SAFETY HARBOR, R 34695 f,] !` ?Lfd6?" L4-.^ ??-L_ 6. •. 94G "• X14 ()2)) )93-9835 F.. Z ^^ O !M) 2. SITE ADDRESS 11: 490 MANDALAY ANE G 0 rnR, •' 3-1 X60 rn ,,, • I,9 !)s6 PARC0. OB/29IAST/16398I000/05)0 Q a 2daNC: < LOT 56 Y n.r. I 3. PRESENT USE I RESTAURANT d 1 CWNERdK WBDING 2 6 .n....w.,,ww f Q 4. DEVELOPED USE 12 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS a ...r N9n: cvvcrz . A W r. f/ 5. roTK SITE AREA 1),45).56 SF (0.10 ACRE) ? R HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL LMT ss U y 8P h .3? =F ` e. SETBACXS: lo'-11 T IBM MIN. TO BLDG.) rnA' w am I " 16.00 MIN. (NORTH TO BACK DF CURB) Yo:r£°' :1 1 ru _ ug I 0.00' (NORM TO OUTAVSTER STAGING AREA) SIDE 15.00' MIN. (EAST TO BUILDING) ?. -`?:? I _-? •\'.. I 0.00 MIN. (EAST TO PAKMENT) LOT 54 SIDE 14.50' MN. (NEST TO PAKMEN T) 6 a?Y?c_., 1 I O ?. i 2y ,6. N1' MN. (NEST TD BLDG.) W SIDE 10.ao' MW. (SWM M BACK OF CURB) ^ w us^ , '°'°' O MCJNT?wF A !?, I__ g I -` .Y I Q] m 35.10' MIN. (SWM TO BLDG) w O z A i?Trf3rrA?mATPJ I ' >.X 7. ALLGWASLE MAX HEIGHT 35'-100' 'T U" a PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT 82'-5- FACIA FENA LINE TO MID-PGNT OF ROOF. •.] r,rwe ?! ?I,Ir ' I ? I Z? 8. SOLID WASTE DUMPSTER WILL BE LOCATED N BUILDING / i a 3 in • ?c LOT 52 8 , ¦ Y I I )(•. 9. UGHRNG WMIN PR0.ECi BOUNDARIES MILL BE ATTACHED TO Z x u. txNa II ?, ?+• • AANR I-) ,_. r 8 BUILDING AND WILL BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF FINAL BUILDING BANS. O 4 n '? c9NCAX3 RAM r) - ? 1 ? ? 10. EXISTING BUILDING F001PRINT AREAS - 6,2s9 3 - 0.11 ACRE ?U • 'r 1-' ~I" h "-P-'! t OA f 1 lY 11. ALL DISTURBED GRASS WTHN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SCODED. ` I - MAid wM 1 I 1 L' •I 3 ' I O 12. ALL UNUSED DRIWWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WTH CURB E I ? qm6 NJ 4DEWAU(. AND LANOSC ANOSCAPMC TO MATCH EXISTING CONp PONS S " _ _____ i ,^y, x,• ;( ROOD )ONE: . . IS smC RE APPEARS TO BE IN AZE MAP AP 'AE' (EL I2), HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL LOT w ` a' •• '+ .A b ;; z ACWR O ING IMC T TO ME ROOD INSURANCE RAM PANEL ? NUMBER 115096 MAP RENSEM MATE SEPTEMBER UNTEMBER 1 200J. pip X, fv Aw (MI A' LO N - 6f-Ar r i FRONDED BY DIE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENC CY. 6 lop -•6, ?••+.• °ST•l P I ta. ME PROJECT SIGNAGE WLL MEET ME dTY OF dEARWAfER CODE. LOT 4v RACC' - ^ 6 Seas N r' • ) 15. MERE ARE NO UT TTY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY ME SURAEY, o a a e YFIOK p6AEWAY CAX55 YCRpA LOT 65 • . ?? , •? R F Q C^ I U 16. MERE ARE NO ENNROMENTKLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE. wA?3 KIN 1 -lAl II I>. 5200E OF BUILDING G PER FACILITY IMPACT FEE I DUE FOR EACH NEW UNIT R TO ( R 17 ISSUANCE OF B ADERG OR FINK PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) WHICH EW EVER OCCURS FIRST. _ a B 1pW $EF No CONTACT ART KADER AT T 727 )2).5 .562.482x. 8 ni` I """" I I1ov .) L J' 18. WNPSTER SEANCE SHALL BE APNWGTD WASTE Y PRIOR TO ME IMM SOLID ( ^ . _ ISSUANCE OF AN OC IK L 5E OR OR CERM TFI ICAIE OF OCCUPANCY. \ n.i.:???6'.•F 8 PLEASE CONTACT TOM GUENN CIENn AT 727 )2)-5624930 £cIKW e-e IG,•,,, 1-1 E95?tlG: EB?030: BEGEBED: ~ ?crmx A-A r r (? A. TOTAL 97 AREA 11,15196 9 (aQ AC) 11,151.56 SF (O.W .1 10.00000 SF B. tOTK OPEN SPACE I,6y 9 M. AC) 5,425.99 4 (0.12 AC) 81266 g (0.05 AC MM.) .'.+~.?...wr .r. 50' R/)W C BUILDING FOOTMT 6.255 9 (0.35158) 6910 9 (0.39 ISR) ®®® 91-EN, i001 (P) rJ1 }F/ D. SpE MA/DE./TAMED AREA, A519.S6 S' 5.121.57 SF - r ?r:? ^..•w4..-..",.. '8= E. TOTAL IU EWOUS AREA, 15774.56 W (a" ISR) 120.11.57 Y 1069 ISR) 16X4M Sr (0.95158 MAX) rx p 3 e ?;? F. PAf69NG SPACES 26 SPACES 25 9'ACES (dl-5SIR) 24 (2 9 CESANTI 2 PUWIC 94- E E !rJ?'- E# : G. AfHQAAR AREA 1.595.61 9 2814.62 9 - P'•^ ^ I A ?inO WO H. MTEIMOR L4IDSCIPE MEA N/A N/A N/A a^cwAn IB R•a L WILT FAWN IXefi 0 12 UNITS 12 UNITS IN WAi$/AmE) SICft t € 3 OF 6 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY BAYMONT LOT 56 1 ' • `? J tl Ki 8 hZ? 7 LOT 51 / I LOT 8f I?' ? ? y a? LOT sz f (r ? t III fit LOT 5,',I ' t I , I LOT 50n?,yy • ' )) ??? F ( '?? ) I ?K ) ?I I t S LOT 0 R?8 L'. --'i•n ( I OT e5 T>yr ?? 'r tea ?? s /a?IL a "?aiaz .1 n 50' env p?l! . I.GAi I A.?. ? .t r ' me bq.. ar .»W.x, ro pq%r ee.?h arm.P wN paint. aq:mum pvn ?n0.cw. M Mx am a Z } ? / as\\ ae tmv eM vt mvMai...u b ? w R Uvea xe. I o- bao- U'we b Ins laws. i. ry o-' ° - » w a ?f ?%' 0 n . Ip w.pr F- W, w uM» pa 5ew ep w, av8 x.xe b.m ta,. ro um.. "°" aa,.vr ? F j » panb a a n Ta M e e ro q e n ? • ' Q A ry e . aaw a x r . . u..am. . o°a cm... e r AxaaaRm, arr.e»e pwb». . = i Jw3 / z `' 'i 4. A$ 0 NW b I- mU tO-t0-5 wb- °. qr Ur m°nukvlu.rn w>r<°U°nr w wn'ryir.4vn .:In GRAPHIC SCALE I a G s ?' ? •? ?-QS?'"?Ir 5. ?n v?wt ?mva? aeon ?h°f m?°u me iw wl°? ` ? ana axab°°ec lfn?°a °n°r UUo-w?b mM i" yvyyyr a.a ret?-Me'v waxib 1 ?// 3 V ' i ?II N . v 4, • a. NI aa"6ro p.x ++ ..c.n. e r aT.. a .To-... m"w., .nan e ro b xt.?.e-+" on.:motn,. a - - +. i' ee Pa+ em a. pom w. q. ao" MM e,.ma. e. ?u?cp ?wxinq w»In.a;on. •^I mapM np m»Wq .pa%abaan Mau b ame.re a et wn »I>.. a. m a ` r . n.r ban q. M. weaaa q. aet aea,mMN ectw ab ? aen, ? b?xw.]? aq. ume.coo. ? _ L?..I ?4 MN °" »u ae m ?°»xr p . at NM ta, u. wna» aX r..a.nm ., n ne M ?n°•Xlaa a m max wq.. 'J m I]. ?"( ?i)m rrwx? corRrn:ny Uw un vn vM/o- epdre°uwr .M. M aLbct.e to ur lwa.mpe rc%tcl z ? C I b w eeeLLava, N.tiMr p .ube .? .v x wwvr'vi a • v.vx. < ? t.. <awwly Mar wv.vntrw in -N. yo , w:xptitY W a ornm anlMx (13) mmtln nem rqm «wearcr h uw a.nr. ? I ? Ma.e M u. tnneaa°o. cwawro- pa. ro Io-asa.. mMrna ?nnwaron. a.ca < bx. 6iva°N°1'iw mm°O.mwa7 `u. xv... P+"ax Mai ? ? a"e.ww p oeMx ro wxgoa?.. qv xl < F ia.0 0ET41 rti.clb Ur tnr GbaPn `iw?ibnaw" ?u papa. mwaovum w.v?`.e wt q Lo e.wve eanbwty vt rc omtiawr exe. ? n" IT. b ao-m?tr xx»an ex m qr u mel o- z b pewees h tM atteuna canVeaM unlnr afenlx x»?mry ralx ?n tlwt w»ifmM» ? ? is W xnbaaro. evn,.meon .ryu .Mr M p.mnn» a do pvpcl xarM Ip IM pvaq ato-moben wn. < I.. 6..p,? x. MM b xm°.x x x»»ary a wmmeeaa n.. Mp,.n9. :a .+n re.ba p». up ea aM.be mae q. aM.aox gMweM" ..on b ..»aa.a emu, sL wwwa. + + a x.-m acl s.a z. 1. . comma 0I M ».wMw la, tn. wwaan. n.Mw. ee pw.. a.ww a om we a exX. o » tb e°o-aN u. a.eaauon a w'. pei»t. + + + U. .. o- e. u.b.e.e .un .yin or .or Moe b .maw. Q q z _ G7 C:] Q ?? / i ?. :X000On me.m, mot °aowa» .ms w»m m bwoa..e C] F U PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) vl°°e"y., `a e. ^.,a'o-. °^^ I"amo.e y eM Ca,n,eew..» a ?"? 3 O n.ca i P'Oirmnliei !teaack ra..m v. mwr, ]v pnoec Rm °??u1W610r i`.oeitc...l C w z aaMn xn.n mun M R d. xt aq cea." seen 3?`f3WC ? .4] a pwa i??.M«o?`o?w -a. a wn «nM, one um... go<lan m-aae em rn ty am arvgi .011 a meerwaona y3 a/o- »bn,vbpr .v t pa. w eaa nna.e6o-? one mvwxmr. ? L +X6alron cenw limo- eu w rx.ra ?cmnecto- v.nt aao-amt. q. (Iecwnnt am w.w wvpr rp U. oex.. e. q. raa.ma owaobo° .rrMn eo-wm.m.:r b. wa.w, o.. xa moron«wo-o- !m-XHN.e i»nUx SW LT.aM9• R..w.-Cemp.nxerp FmRtp UM X.Rn6 - ae of a u 0.aeoo. cenna nm. - 6 6 Q A enema. - z,wa • tMbk wx Hasa aooa ::; r . .q rya °"? F Q B 0. Q tl 6 PKa 5 le- PKM 6a J fi PKY 9 10 TOTK ]BEES KMOVEO ....... Ra? _ MswM b? i°O to sw °?xawu°?1M iimR.. rnp!M QiT'rpir'.I SiT.XeoaeReO ?? u lib 0= Mp]W JOM.E`°u».J]O I.I 0C XlUlrcy XMVS, ] aaL, xr n, f]a 0.c ) e o R.pra.rY lien., iron X.we•n '-.c. T? vtv ve ponm TObY.Yang-V.paYVVgvu.JblTa'IttfaO t a v a.p..Wn e.os,... vep,xn]au-ae gyn. it aal 5 OF 6 SUE DATE 081006 PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 11 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I I i LOW wAi1 BALCCNY BALC[NY i I I j f 1 1 1 i I LNM 1 LNRrO 1 ? 1 1 r-------- LOWWALL mmDDIO(Awn) pAlGgiY AL, ; pYC}» ( WNW ? it 'I WOW I I LNDp i ?' 5'I o c o. co 4 DWM 1 )DYcm I Q ; ?a - I. I ; emlwoNa a 1 t $a CIMV-413 PMPASOM LAYOlr 1 I 1 AND DDBTAUS -1 y I NASt7u1 1 MAS1fA ; I r? ? 1 l?WttOGAt ; ?IOROONb ?mllOWt , ?bI100/A1'1 1 I I I 1 1 I I C7 0 'r-- BOMMWa TRA I TEA 1 r--- 1 DIRE i$ I Mgt I I I lYne" I 127r I I 1 I I L--_ COIOfOIOA28A 1 I • 1 I t I I 1 NbYAiWI I IRr L6Y0. 1 ow) ti ?11CA1 ri p ; _-_- ? 1 1+ 7 nA78M MATSR RIAII eA r ecoAOON I oegeooNn I Loft I N.n/ L081Y -...il ?w IMfY RA9tN p DIRfANCB IO+V° ------------------ 6411V 641W GROUND FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN masr rtmu> 1Frx UV= LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SIXTH LIVIHOLVEL SCALE: Ire^-1'a' SCALE : 118^-1'1Y' SCALE : lre" • 1',V' mapnsme P._ INSIDE our a OROUP NQ. IIt1AUDtK UIt11SGN.N"DA UA.A ?1AI1 IrMr>t.1n7 ?nsn'i»f?f Atnllan n II AMANq t?7 ROOF PLAN SCAM IS'- •-0" LM INSIDE OUT O GROUP Am SinvNANAVO M NYNAOM,RMDA 308 mn?wMA NONN4TIt t??R ANdNKT fUtl 1-UG 112006 'LANNIN DEPARTMENT CITY OF I GdMAA-- a NurN O uaa.Na FA FLOOR PLAN sevamEmKotavm. SCAM: IA NY ELEVATION NEW 0=6MW1 6a1, wNtl IIRe AT, F, 14,1 l EAST ELEVATION 1 1.W1v WEST ELEVATION 1C,:6..1N•.IV• INSIDE OUT O GROUP mc. MLOUM.Mm Gi,„.t1M.HDI m 1160! 61l 7M-M0 kcmrk AMffW MIS ORIGINAL RECEIVED #.u r,% 112 0 0 6 NNING DEPARTMEN TY OF CLEARWATER . h 6lntgn n 6 MAT 1106 NORTH ELEVATION 1cx.a: M1•. ro? MAO?YMtU1o .e, t'+' '.+;rj ?? A'Ifwlf ..'a;. 1®e! .'.f of AAan eetrw?? .5., 1..IMtrmNtCw '? . rtG .:lf?' ? r ORL tY + I? Im ?[ Otl0 MtC 3? .? `K - ^, ? F? 'eetNl•M'titlr TA01 r ? ?t fa - t. VOW. ju&.t3,4. k an MW IF s J, CAAM-t4-W SOUTH EAST E ICAIf ltr. rr Kei fm•.1w ,a.I.atoom.IT M(MM M..nte IIWYIy({ty - +:jC •:','• w.k:' GuT <MY M.YLfY tNAGW WATERFRONT x EM J. 0.kYWWM 9OAOr CtlAeeltWltD L bCMtytOtar ¦ ( t?l MA141 amuNe 'tit e711t oama EEB -• s , i. A41tNeD ?l 1+' ?IWnpYY tr-LU i1.C ; ¦ ¦j: <M1. r'. R' 9 .16 _.T i , 1 axwl.rntnul LLIJ. AAC.n.r,t ?11ta. alm R? - y a. ? em1 n« e>.1 NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION K/.J La••rr s>.u.lnr•rr INSIDE OUT O GROUP mc 0viLU0Y1AV.e,. 3TMfM•%1) -Tx V ACIfItCT .llfS ORIGINAL RECEIVED 3 112 0 0 6 PL'A` MNG DEPARM v ry OF CLEARW,41 a?. tt,,.tn s wn IwTts • "DURON" RESTRAINED GOLD SW 6129 "DURON" IVOIRE SW 6127 oil ARCADE WHITE # 7100 C C? LL: ~ j = N o ? U ? Oa C zo z? s? 0 0 "DURON" SMOKEY TOPA7SW 61 17 Z s i *-Of ?w Fy,. G-TONIS BY THE SEA 1. rxmu ;,m. N ?T +I M I'..'5 1 PUiiLDC UTILTTIF PAGE 02 10 r-- F FLOW T.Fs"'T Cl-r? OF CL EARWA'T ER. WATER 0EPART'I41f ---NT LOCATION iDATE F TEST da PSI RES PSI GPM CUSTOMER REQUESTiNG TEST '05I17I2006 11:02 7278213361 0 GRINER ENGINEERING • PAGE 05 "°'?' ?A o ???Ll Pub 100 S. Clearwater Fire & •Rmeue 10 Franklin Street -'Clearwater, Florida 33756 f Works Administration - Engineering Department Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756 FIRE FLOW HYDRANT WORKSHEET ( wised 03129/2006) This worksheet is required to be submitted to an meeting for any project that is more than 3 storie access point or for any other project that will req any permits for new building construction, building Information and design must comply with Florida Prevention Code to include applicable NFPA Cod and AWWA M-17 - installation, Field Testing and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle ire an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fire Pump before expansion or fire hydrants will be Issued by the City of Clearwater. Building Code, Chapter 9 •- Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20. 291 and 1142 Annex H) aintenance of Fire Hydrants. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Waterfront Condominium Project Address: 490 Mandala Avenue --Cle arwater, Florida 33767 GENERAL WATER SYSTEM INFORMATIO Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant: Mandal Ave. a d B ont St. Hydrant* 1 Size of Water Main Supplying Fire Flow: 6" Looped System or Dead End Water Main? Looped static: 57 psi Residual: 47 psi Pilot: 43. psi Flow: 1,110 gpm Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Riser: Horizontal 150 Ft. vertical Elevation 2 (+? j Ft. Hydrant Test Conducted by. C' of Clearwater Keith Za ac (Include/Anaeh Copy of Actuel Test Sheet) NFPA HAZARD 'CLASSIFic-A-hON Area # Classification D cription of Hazard Protected ( • Ordinary Mod* Desch Wn Storage Height end Anengement, if q*fteble): ara e 2. Light Hazard ving Area Attach AddMonal Shoals WAboa pry ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 1 of 3 k.UG 11 200 PLANNING DEPAk riTV nr ri PAPIA ??'??ER 05/17/2006 11:02 7278213361 • GRINER ENGINEERING • PAGE 06 ,:• Y .D ION:P.ARAME7 ERS =; J.?.'. Y sage Area # System Type Area (sq. ft:) Density (gpm/lt) Inside Hose (gpm) Outside Hose (gpm) 1. Wet 1500 (calc) 0.15 0 250 2. Wet 850 0.1 0 100 Attedf AddWbnat Sheets A Iveaomirt 750 gpm (Auto-Wet- Totai Needed Firs Flow (N.F.F.) Standpipe) is Existing System Supply Sutt lent to Meet N.F.F. Above? N/A No Yes CODES.AN T\MDARDS ...w;k-.i ' . 1.. J! • ILA ii ?p A..• ::M i\+:.yw?y System Component Applicable NFPA Standard / Year Edition and Oftw App/ citable Codes or Statutes Sprinkler System NFPA -13 2002 Edition Manuel. Standpipe - Wet NFPA -14 2003 Edition Fire Pump NFPA - 20 2003 Edition Attach Addttionw Sheets it Abwsww If Project includes Fire Pump, Supply the Following: Fire Pump Information- Pump Capacity: 750 gpm Chum Pressure: 173 psi Rated Pressure: 120 psi - Pressure a 15096 Flow:112 . psi 0nSite Storage Tank Capacity (?): 0 PREP.ARER:T,SPEI:IFIER•INFORMATION'••s=' Preparer Name: Joseph H. Griner, Ili, P.E. Company Name: Griner Engineering Inc. Mailing Address: 1628 First Avenue North City: Saint Petersburg state: FL zip: 33713 Phone: 727.822.2335 Fax: 727.821.3361 ?*11s1614.e.,,. •,+ HENRY G •?, 10 CENq lo • 91 '' • tr •• A ++. ••? O R 1 P• ••. P.E. Seal ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 2or3 AUG 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 05/17/2006 11:02 7270213361 7?i56??561 ?_;i2a'268E 87: e4 GRINER ENGINEERING 0 PAGE 07 ;%rL4,Tti UTILITIF PA+a"E ?? -1-i I FLOW TEST CITY OF CI.EA .WATER WATER DE°ARTINENT 'PATE OF TEST JTI .Net-, ?L)LA%-- CLls_roMER REQUF_s-r*lG TEST M ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUGG 11 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFR GIONIS CONDOMINIUMS STORMWATER NARRATIVE The attached stormwater report include calculations for the pre/post CN number, stormwater treatment and attenuation of the 25 year 1 hour storm event to pre-condition flows. The proposed stormwater pond is a normally dry system providing treatment for 0.5" of runoff over the site, and attenuation of the 25 year 1 hour storm event prior to discharge into a control structure connected via underground pipe to the adjacent City system. ?E`W ZAYAf r f r 40. Gionis Condominiums Stormwater Calculations EXISTING CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C = pavement 9,520 0.49 building 6,255 0.49 pond 0 1.00 open area 1,683 0.20 YCA 4,664.8 3,065.0 336.6 Cexist = 0.46 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 -X C= pavement 3,167 0.98 building 6,844 0.98 pond 1,539 1.00 open area 5,908 0.20 3,103.7 6,107.1 1,539.0 1,181.6 C prop - 0.72 ATTENUATION VOLUME REQUIRED: Volume Required = delta C x A x I x 3600 delta C = 0.26 Area - 0.4 acres I = 4.2 in/hr 25 year 1 hour storm Volume Required = 1546.827 cubic feet Stage-Storage-Perime ter Project Name: Gionis Condo Project Number: Designer: is Date: 02:22:06 Comments: POND 1 (0.5in)`(1 FT/12in)'(17 ,458 SF) = 727 CF Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): ( (ft3) Area @ Design High Water(DHW : 2,207.0 Elevation: .0 5.0 0 Volume: 1 975 Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): 1,969.5 Elevation: 4.80 , Volume: 1 557 Area @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 1,399.6 Elevation: 4.32 , Volume: 749 426.0 Elevation: 3.50 Volume: 0 STAGE AREA VOLUME ( (ft) (ft2) (ft3) ( ft) (ft STAGE AREA 2 VOLUME TREATMENT 3.50 426.0 0 0 (ft) (ft ) (ft3) VOLUME: 749 ft3 . 3.53 461.6 13 3 4.25 1,316.5 653.4 . 3.56 497.2 27 7 4.28 1,352.1 693.5 ATTENUATION . 3.59 532.9 43.1 4.31 1,387.7 734.6 _ r_16 A-) VOLUME: 809 ft ' 162 568.5 59 7 4.34 1,423.4 776.7 . 3.65 604.1 77 3 4.37 1,459.0 820.0 . 3.68 639.7 95 9 4.40 1,494.6 864.3 . 3.71 675.3 115 6 4.43 1,530.2 909.6 . 3.74 711.0 136 4 4.46 1,565.8 956.1 . 3.77 746.6 158 3 4.49 1,601.5 1,003.6 . 180 782.2 181 2 4.52 1,637.1 1,052.2 . 3.83 817.8 205 2 4.55 1,672.7 1,101.8 . 3.86 853.4 230 3 4.58 1,708.3 1,152.5 . 3.89 889.1 256 4 4.61 1,743.9 1,204.3 . 3.92 924.7 283 6 4.64 1,779.6 1,257.2 . 3.95 960.3 311 9 4.67 1,815.2 1,311.1 . 3.98 995.9 341 3 4.70 1,850.8 1,366.1 . 4.01 1 031.5 371 7 4.73 1,886.4 1,422.1 , . 4.04 1 067.2 403 2 4.76 1,922.0 1,479.3 , . 4.07 1,102.8 435.7 4.79 1,957.7 1,537.5 ftT?"U/t? 0c"?I d? 4.10 1,138.4 469.3 4.82 4 85 1,993.3 2 028 9 1,596 7 1 657 1 ?? G?W 4.13 1 174.0 504 0 . , . , . , . 4.16 1,209.6 539 8 4.88 2,064.5 1,718.5 . 4.19 1,245.3 576 6 4.91 2,100.1 1,780.9 . 4.22 1,280.9 614 5 4.94 2,135.8 1,844.5 . 4.97 2,171.4 1,909.1 5.00 2,207.0 1,974.8 40 1IGURSKI & HARRIL ATTORNEYS AT LAW GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A. J. BEN HARRILL, P.A. August 7, 2006 Wayne M. Wells, AICP Senior Planner City of Clearwater P.O.. Box. 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 www.fhlaw.net RE: Mary G. Realty, Inc. FLD2006-020099 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Wayne: TELEPHONE: (727) 942-0733 FAX: (727) 944-3711 Enclosed please find our client's check in the amount of $75.00 to cover the fee for the continuance in the above-referenced matter. Should you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Maureen J. Peck Paralegal /mjp Enclosure RECEIVED AUG 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER S?pte„? 8/9/2006 Receipt #: 1200600000000008108 10:43:30AM Date: 08/09/2006 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-02009 04 Flex Continuation 010-341262 75.00 Line Item Total: $75.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid 40 Check MARY G REALTY R_D 3095 In Person 75.00 Payment Total: $75.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 D qlll 6 0 FLD2006-02009 490 MANDALAY AVE Date Received: 02/24/2006 GIONIS CONDOMINIUMS ORIGINAL RECEIVED ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 267A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW AUG 11 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN. CITY OF CLEARWATER CLWCoverSheet • s LONG RANGE PLANNING DrWLOPMENT R:vIEW C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OI'I'Ici? Box 4748, G.F?ARWATFR, FI.ORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.r AVFNUI,, CI.FARWATFR, FLORIDA 33756 TI?I.rPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 September 20, 2006 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-02009 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 19, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain and trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain, pergolas and raised platform) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. The Community Development Board (CDB) DENIED the application with the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: Findings of Fact: 1. The subject 0.4 acres is located within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a shopping center with retail sales and a restaurant; 3. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a high-rise residential building of 12 attached dwellings; 4. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Destination Resort" District; 5. The proposal meets or exceeds required setbacks to the south and west; 6. The proposed building height is 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof); 7. The proposed building height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The proposal includes 25 parking spaces on the ground level, which meets the minimum Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit; 9. While the building facades have been greatly improved, the proposal still does not comply with the attached dwelling criteria requiring "an improved site plan or improved design and appearance" relating to the request for increased height; 10. The building and site layout, coupled with the lack of an active retail fagade along the Mandalay Avenue frontage, even with the applicant's alternative (plaza, fountain, seating, pergolas and the PRANK I IIIMARI), MAYOR Jum DoioN, Couicai.,,%w m:i< I IOVI I IANiicrON, CO NULNI MIWR B11.1.JcrosoN, Counc11.:\11:w cR CAri.v-, A. Prii;RSP:N, GWN01-NIBIBr:R "I Q1W, ENIPLOYVHNT ANI> Ar•Pi1\•a1A'1 Ivit Ac;TUm F..\ I.c i:W' September 20, 2006 Zayac - Page Two "Mandalay Information Center") does not create a design that is harmonious and suitable for this high profile location on Mandalay Avenue; 11. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.13; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Staff concludes that this proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 4. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends denial of this application. An appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 3, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AI Planning Director Cc: Gerald Figurski, Esq. S: IFlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslMandalay 0490 Gionis Condominiums (T) - DeniedlMandalay 490 Development Order.doc 0 WFIGURSKI & HARRILL ATTORNEYS AT LAW GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A. J. BEN HARRILL, P.A. September 14, 2006 GAF/m,l'l,p cc: k*ayne M. THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 www.flilaw.net David Gildersleeve Chair Community Development Board City of Clearwater 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Mary G Realty, Inc. FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Gildersleeve: TELEPHONE: (727) 942-0733 FAX: (727) 944-3711 This firm represents Mary G Realty, Inc. This matter is scheduled to be heard by the Community Development Board on Tuesday, September 19, 2006. I would request additional time, a maximum of twenty (20) minutes, in order to make our initial presentation. It may not be that this time will be necessary. Thank you for your consideration. ef.a I RSKI G RA Wells, AICP, Planner III 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Steve Luce [steve@luceplanning.com] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'Jerry Figurski' Subject: Gionis By The Sea - resume Wayne, Attached is my resume. Call me if you have any second thoughts and want to tell me you are recommending approval. Steven K. Luce, AICP President Luce Planning Group, Inc. P.O. Box 18282 Tampa FL 33679-8282 Office Phone: 813-870-3494 Cell Phone: 813-767-5763 E-Mail: Steve@LucePlanning.com 9/19/2006 z? i LULE STEVEN K. LUCE, AICP PRESIDENT LUCE PLANNING GROUP, INC Mr. Luce offers 20 years of planning experience with expertise in public- and private-sector master plan developments, zoning applications, and public hearing presentations. His professional credentials include serving as the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) coordinator for the Hillsborough County Planning and Growth Management Department for more than a decade. In addition, Mr. Luce has first-hand knowledge of the regulatory submittal, review, and approval procedures of state-wide, regional and local government agencies and departments, having served as lead planner on major planning projects throughout central Florida. Mr. Luce has also extended his expertise to assisting the Florida Department of Transportation in developing sound socio-economic data, Tampa Bay Water in developing and protecting their regional water resources specifically being involved in major eminent domain cases related to the reservoir and transmission facilities and the Tampa Port Authority in developing their Port Master Plan. A widely recognized expert in the land development and DRI process, Mr. Luce is largely responsible for managing large scale land development projects for private sector clients. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2006 - Present President, Luce Planning Group, Inc. 2003 -2006: Senior Project Manager, WilsonMiller, Inc., Tampa, Florida 1998 -2003: Planning Manager, URS Inc., Tampa, Florida 1987 -1998 Executive Planner, Hillsborough County, Florida PROJECT EXPERIENCE High Rise Residential The Boulevard, Tampa, Florida - project manager responsible for preparing the site plan, zoning application and processing the project through the City of Tampa rezoning public hearing process. Project was an approx 500 unit condominium project. 610 Franklin, Tampa, Florida - project manager responsible for preparing the site plan, zoning application and processing the project through the City of Tampa rezoning public hearing process. Project was an approx 350 unit condominium project. BLU, Tampa, Florida - project manager responsible for preparing the site plan, zoning application and processing the project through the City of Tampa rezoning public hearing process. Project was an approx 250 unit condominium project. Rocky Point, Tampa, Florida - manager responsible for preparing the site plan, zoning application and processing the project through the City of Tampa rezoning public hearing process. Project was an approx 160 unit condominium project. Residential / Mixed-Use Bexley Ranch, Pasco County, Florida - project manager responsible for the regulatory processing and approvals for this 7,000-acre mixed-use master planned community. Responsible for preparation of applications, attendance at regulatory agency meetings, public hearing presentations, negotiations, relation to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Application for Development Approval, and Rezoning of the property. P .O. BOX 18282 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33679-8282. 813.870.3494 (O) • 813.767.5763 (C) s STEVE@LUCEPLA.NNING.COM LUCE PLANNING GROUP • • STEVEN K. LUCE, AICP PRESIDENT LUCE PLANNING GROUP, INC Mr. Luce offers 20 years of planning experience with expertise in public- and private-sector master plan developments, zoning applications, and public hearing presentations. His professional credentials include serving as the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) coordinator for the Hillsborough County Planning and Growth Management Department for more than a decade. In addition, Mr. Luce has first-hand knowledge of the regulatory submittal, review, and approval procedures of state-wide, regional and local government agencies and departments, having served as lead planner on major planning projects throughout central Florida. Mr. Luce has also extended his expertise to assisting the Florida Department of Transportation in developing sound socio-economic data, Tampa Bay Water in developing and protecting their regional water resources specifically being involved in major eminent domain cases related to the reservoir and transmission facilities and the Tampa Port Authority in developing their Port Master Plan. A widely recognized expert in the land development and DRI process, Mr. Luce is largely responsible for managing large scale land development projects for private sector clients. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2006 - Present President, Luce Planning Group, Inc. 2003 -2006: Senior Project Manager, WilsonMiller, Inc., Tampa, Florida 1998 -2003: Planning Manager, URS Inc., Tampa, Florida 1987 -1998 Executive Planner, Hillsborough County, Florida PROJECT EXPERIENCE High Rise Residential The Boulevard, Tampa, Florida - project manager responsible for preparing the site plan, zoning application and processing the project through the City of Tampa rezoning public hearing process. Project was an approx 500 unit condominium project. 610 Franklin, Tampa, Florida - project manager responsible for preparing the site plan, zoning application and processing the project through the City of Tampa rezoning public hearing process. Project was an approx 350 unit condominium project. BLU, Tampa, Florida - project manager responsible for preparing the site plan, zoning application and processing the project through the City of Tampa rezoning public hearing process. Project was an approx 250 unit condominium project. Rocky Point, Tampa, Florida - manager responsible for preparing the site plan,. zoning application and processing the project through the City of Tampa rezoning public hearing process. Project was an approx 160 unit condominium project. Residential / Mixed-Use Bexley Ranch, Pasco County, Florida - project manager responsible for the regulatory processing and approvals for this 7,000-acre mixed-use master planned community. Responsible for preparation of applications, attendance at regulatory agency meetings, public hearing presentations, negotiations, relation to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Application for Development Approval, and Rezoning of the property. 0 0 Steven K. Luce, AICP Page 2 Connerton, Pasco County, Florida - project manager responsible for the regulatory processing and approvals for this 5,000-acre mixed-use master planned community. Prepared applications; attended regulatory agency meetings, public hearing presentations, and negotiations; and related to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Application for Development Approval, and Rezoning of the property. Bailey Ranch, Sumter County, Florida - project manager responsible for due diligence and development of a mixed-use master plan for a 9,000-acre parcel of property located in unincorporated Sumter County. Evaluated the infrastructure services, environmental conditions, and community characteristics. Assessed the feasibility of gaining regulatory approvals and maximizing the developing potential of the property. Citrus Park Village, Hillsborough County, Florida - project manager responsible for the creation of a Traditional Neighborhood Master Plan for an 800-acre community located within unincorporated Hillsborough County. Prepared traditional design regulations and zoning master plan. Worked with community leaders and local government planning staff in the process of developing a viable mixed-use neighborhood Master Plan. Triple Creek, Hillsborough County, Florida - principal member of project team involved in the creation of a greenfields traditional town plan on a 1,000-acre parcel of property. Guided the development of the master plan; wrote the town plan regulatory requirements; and provided advocacy for the client. Negotiated final conditions of approval and presented master plan at public hearings. Dadeland Junction, Miami, Florida - researched, assessed, and prepared a Binding Letter application for this vertically integrated highly urban mixed use retail, office, movie theater, and residential development proposed just southwest of downtown Miami, adjacent to a Metrorail station in Dade County. Kendall Village Center, Miami, Florida - researched, assessed, and prepared Binding Letter application for this mixed use, retail, office, hotel and residential development proposed west of the Homestead Extension of the Florida Turnpike in Dade County. Apollo Beach, Hillsborough County, Florida - responsible for incremental application review for specific approval for Phases II and III of this 5,000-acre, mixed-use waterfront community on Tampa Bay in southeastern Hillsborough County. The project was originally approved for approximately 14,000 residential units and several million square feet of retail, office and industrial development. Public-Sector 22nd Street Property, City of Tampa, Florida - project manager responsible for the regulatory processing and approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for high density residential on a 60-acre parcel of waterfront property within the City of Tampa. Tampa Port Authority Master Plan, Florida - developed the Tampa Port Authority Master Plan which will allow for the long term development of both non-traditional port development (e.g. mixed use entertainment/retail/cruise terminal uses) along the waterfront within the Channelside District of downtown Tampa and traditional industrial based port related uses throughout the majority of Hookers Point and the balance of the Port of Tampa. The planning document also addresses transportation issues, port capacity, demand and future needs, in-water maintenance facilities and environmental and safety programs. Provided advocacy services for the Tampa Port Authority. Worked closely with Hillsborough County, City of Tampa, Planning Commission and Department of Community Affairs staff, addressing their specific concerns/issues, gained their support and ultimately make certain the Master Plan was successfully adopted into the Comprehensive Plans of both local jurisdictions (document approved without amendment). • • Steven K. Luce, AICP Page 3 Eminent Domain General Planning Consultant, Tampa Bay Water, Florida - project manager for land use planning services that included resource/site selection, eminent domain, comprehensive planning, and zoning related activities. Hillsborough County Reservoir, Florida - land planner responsible for the eminent domain planning analysis for this 5,000-acre reservoir project. Tampa Bay Water Pipelines, Hillsborough County, Florida - land planner responsible for the eminent domain planning analysis for pipeline projects. Also responsible for the eminent domain planning work related to the pipeline corridor to the reservoir. General Planning Consultant, Hillsborough County, Florida - project manager for land use planning services provided for community planning and zoning related activities. General Planning Consultant, Dade City, Florida - project manager for land use planning services to support to Dade City on comprehensive planning and zoning related activities. Transportation District-wide TAZ/Land Use Analysis, FDOT District VII - lead land planner for the comprehensive evaluation of all district-wide approved major land development projects vs base year and 2015 projected TAZ population/employment data. Recommended appropriate adjustments to centroid and TAZ data. SR 54 Corridor TAZ/Land Use Analysis, Pasco County, Florida - lead land planner for analysis of all approved and proposed major land development projects vs base year and 2015 project TAZ population/employment data for the FDOT, District VII. Recommended appropriate adjustments to centroid and TAZ data. Commercial Tampa Bay Mills, Hillsborough County, Florida - prepared preliminary assessment of project impacts associated with the development of a regional mall on the Florida State Fairgrounds property located at I- 4/US 301 in Hillsborough County. FDOT Research Park, Gainesville, Florida - responsible for the preparation of a zoning application and site development plan for a Florida Department of Transportation State Materials Office research center. Negotiated final conditions and presented application at public hearings for final approval. Expert Witness/Eminent Domain, Hillsborough County, Florida - land use consultant for Hillsborough County regarding Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and site development issues related to the acquisition of right-of-way for the construction of county roadways. NOPCs Brandon Town Center, Hillsborough County, Florida - reviewed several NOPCs regarding extensions of build-out dates and incorporation of a trade-off mechanism for this 300-acre, 1.7-million-square-foot mall project. Carrollwood Village, Hillsborough County, Florida - processed several NOPCs to exchange uses on specific parcels and to extend the project build-out date for this 1,900-acre residential mixed-use project. Citrus Park Town Center, Hillsborough County, Florida - reviewed ADA and NOPCs for this 215-acre two-million-square-foot regional mall project. The DRI amendments were for additional time, to add acreage, trade off uses and reconstruct the transportation mitigation language. Involved in the review of the Capital Contribution Front Ending Agreement, which established the financing plan for roadway improvements. • F-I Steven K. Luce. AICP Page 4 The Pavilion, Hillsborough County, Florida - reviewed several NOPCs regarding transportation mitigation, inclusion of a trade-off mechanism to allow the project to be developed as a residential/retail development, replanning of the project site, and time frame extensions. Regency Park North, Hillsborough County, Florida - reviewed several NOPCs regarding the transportation mitigation language, the rearrangement of uses, inclusion of a trade-off mechanism to allow the development of more hotel rooms, and time frame extensions. Southbend, Hillsborough County, Florida - reviewed NOPCs for the inclusion of a trade-off mechanism to allow for greater flexibility in the range of uses that may be developed on site and for extension of time frames for this project originally approved for 4.2-million-square-feet of office, retail, and industrial space and 2,800 residential units. State Street, Hillsborough County, Florida - reviewed NOPCs regarding the inclusion of a trade-off mechanism allowing residential development, changes to the transportation mitigation language, and time frame extensions. Summerfield Crossings, Hillsborough County, Florida - reviewed NOPCs regarding the downsizing of this project originally approved for 2.1-million-square-feet of retail and office development and 6,300 residential units. Also involved changes to the transportation mitigation language, replanning of portions of the project, and time frame extensions. Towermarc, Waters Avenue, Hillsborough County, Florida - provided ADA and NOPC review of the transportation improvements, replanning of the site, inclusion of a trade-off mechanism to allow the project to be developed with more retail and to add multi-family to the mix, and extension of time frames. Tri-County Business Park, Hillsborough County, Florida - reviewed several NOPCs to replanning of the site for this 390-acre, 4.1-million-square-foot primarily industrial project. Also involved the inclusion of a trade-off mechanism to allow residential development, and time frame extensions. DRIs During his tenure as the Hillsborough County DR/ Coordinator, Mr. Luce was responsible for numerous DRI reviews which included initial applications and multiple amendments and involved extensive research, analysis, public sector advocacy, negotiating, regulatory reporting and public hearing presentations. Projects of note include: Advance Leasing, Hillsborough County, Florida Apollo Beach, Hillsborough County, Florida Big Basin Commerce Park, Hillsborough County, Florida Bloomingdale, Hillsborough County, Florida Boca Bahia, Hillsborough County, Florida The Boyette Tract, Hillsborough County, Florida Brandon Mall, Hillsborough County, Florida Brandon Town Center, Hillsborough County, Florida Cargill, Hillsborough County, Florida Carrollwood Village, Hillsborough County, Florida CFI Phosphogypsum Stack Expansion, Hillsborough County, Florida Citrus Park Town Center, Hillsborough County, Florida Corporex Business Park, Hillsborough County, Florida The Crescent, Hillsborough County, Florida Cross Creek, Hillsborough County, Florida East Lake Square Mall, Hillsborough County, Florida Eastshore Commerce Park, Hillsborough County, Florida • C] Steven K. Luce, AICP Page 5 Fish Hawk Ranch, Hillsborough County, Florida Florida Corporate Center, Hillsborough County, Florida Highland Park, Hillsborough County, Florida Interstate Business Park, Hillsborough County, Florida Lake Fair Mall, Hillsborough County, Florida Lands End Marina, Hillsborough County, Florida Parkway Center, Hillsborough County, Florida The Pavilion, Hillsborough County, Florida Regency Park North, Hillsborough County, Florida Sabal Center, Hillsborough County, Florida Southbend, Hillsborough County, Florida State Street, Hillsborough County, Florida Summerfield Crossings, Hillsborough County, Florida Sunforest, Hillsborough County, Florida Sunway, Hillsborough County, Florida Tampa Triangle, Hillsborough County, Florida Towermarc - Waters Avenue, Hillsborough County, Florida Tri-County Business Park, Hillsborough County, Florida Vandenberg Airport, Hillsborough County, Florida Westchase, Hillsborough County, Florida Wolf Creek Branch, Hillsborough County, Florida Woodland Corporate Center, Hillsborough County, Florida Mr. Luce also provided site selection work, zoning reviews and/or DRI threshold determinations conducted on these public facility type projects: Dover Road Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, Hillsborough County, Florida Falkenburg Road County Office/Warehouse Facility, Hillsborough County, Florida Falkenburg Road Jail, Hillsborough County, Florida Falkenburg Road Juvenile Justice Facility, Hillsborough County, Florida Florida State Fairgrounds, Hillsborough County, Florida Hillsborough County - County Road 672 Landfill, Hillsborough County, Florida Legends Field - New York Yankees Spring Training Complex, Tampa, Florida Sheldon Road Regional Sludge Treatment Plant, Hillsborough County, Florida Sheldon Road Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant, Hillsborough County, Florida EDUCATION Master of Science, Geography, Oklahoma State University, 1986 Bachelor of Science, Environmental Science, Cornell University, 1982 REGISTRATIONS American Institute of Certified Planners PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Planning Association American Institute of Certified Planners 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jerry Figurski [fig@fhlaw.net] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:55 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Steve Luce Subject: Resume Wayne, Steve is now sending you his resume directly. I had trouble receiving his here for some strange reason. Gerald A. Figurski FIGURSKI & HARRILL 2550 Permit Place New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 942-0733 fig@fhlaw.net 9/19/2006 Sep 14 2006 10:50RM 1wASERJET 3330 C7 FIGURSKI & HARRILL THE OAKS AT PERR.INE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 Phone Number: (727) 942-0733 Fax Number: (727) 944-3711 p.I Fax Date Sent: To: Fax No: From: Re: September 14, 2006 Wayne Wells 562-4576 Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire SEP l 4 2006 U-14-tOPMENT 3fwulC Total pages, including cover: 2 (If you do not receive all of the pages indicated, please call our office as soon as possible) COMMENTS. CONFIDENTIAL WARNING - THIS TRANSMISSION MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN INFORMATION WHICH IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS TRANSMISSION AND RECEIVED TT IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER IDENTIFIED ABOVE FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS. Sep 14 2006 10:50AM GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A. 1. BEN HARRILL, P.A. September 14, 2006 • FIGURSKI & HARRILL ATTORNEYS AT LAW THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY; FLORIDA 34655 www.fhlaw.net David Gildersleeve Chair Community Development Board City of Clearwater 112 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: . Mary G Realty, Inc. FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Gildersleeve: p.2 TELEPHONE. (727) 942-0733 FAX:(727)944-3711 This firm represents Mary G Realty, Inc. This matter is scheduled to be heard by the Community Development Board on Tuesday, September 19, 2006. I would request additional time, a maximum of twenty (20) minutes, in order to make our initial presentation. It may not be that this time will be necessary. Thank you for your consideration. Ue I RSKI G R-A ? V ASERJET 3330 GAF/mjp cc: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jerry Figurski [fig@fhlaw.net] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 5:04 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: KZA Resume Resume for CDB. Thanks. Jerry From: Keith Zayac [mailto:keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:01 PM To: Jerry Figurski Subject: KZA Resume Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 9/15/2006 0 0 Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA President Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Education Keith has more than 23 years of civil engineering and landscape architecture B.S., Landscape Architecture, experience in the consulting industry. His varied background includes project Purdue University, 1983 management, conceptual master planning, site and roadway design, stormwater B.S., Civil Engineering, University management and drainage system design, sewage collection and water of Central Florida, 1990 distribution system design, permitting, and regional stormwater analysis. He also has extensive experience in land planning, landscape and irrigation design. Registrations Keith has served as project manager on numerous commercial/retail/office Professional Engineer developments, entertainment/theme parks, residential communities, educational Florida facilities, and municipal projects throughout the state of Florida. He has served Registered Landscape Architect as a Vice Mayor for the City of Safety Harbor, and on the Tampa Bay Regional Florida Planning Council. Professional Affiliations Vice Mayor, City of Safety Harbor REPRESENTATIVE INDIVIDUAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE 1999-2006 Tampa Bay Regional Planning Munici pal and Institutional Council, Council Member 1999-2006 • Zephyrhills Police Station; Zephyrhills, Florida Rotary International • Oldsmar Library; Oldsmar, Florida Leadership Pinellas Board Member • Palms of Pasadena Hospital; South Pasadena, Florida 2000 • Cypress Forest Park; Oldsmar, Florida Relay for Life Steering Committee . Homosassa Elementary School; Citrus County, Florida • Land O Lakes Library; Pasco County, Florida • Regency Park Library; Pasco County, Florida • Palm Harbor Fire Station; Pinellas County, Florida • Belleair Beach Community Center; Belleair Beach, Florida • Safety Harbor Chamber of Commerce; Safety Harbor, Florida Commercial/Retail/Office • Dairy Queen; Riverview, Florida • Sleep Inn; Charlotte County, Florida • Autonation USA; Tampa, Florida • Autonation USA; Seminole County, Florida • Autonation USA; West Palm Beach, Florida • Dairy Queen; Hillsborough County, Florida • Walgreens Store 54th Ave., St. Petersburg, Florida • Hospice, St. Petersburg, Florida • Walgreens Store; St. Petersburg, Florida • Walgreens Store; U.S. 19, Pinellas County, Florida • Super Storage II, Pinellas County, Florida • Walgreens Store, Lee County, Florida • Shoppes at Plantation Shopping Center, Lee County, Florida • Surf Style 12, Clearwater, Florida • Carey Law Office, Clearwater, Florida • Waffle House, Hillsborough County, Florida • Crackerbarrel; Pinellas County, Florida • Walgreens Store, Ocoee, Florida • Walgreens Store, Charlotte County, Florida • Harbour Square Shopping Center; Clearwater, Florida 0 0 • Broedell Plumbing Supply; Pasco County, Florida • Knology; Clearwater, Florida • Knology; Pinellas County, Florida • Knology; Largo, Florida • Knology; Pinellas Park, Florida Entertainment/Recreation/Resort • Hard Rock Hotel and Casino; Tampa, Florida • Hard Rock Hotel and Casino; Hollywood, Florida • Floridan Hotel; Tampa, Florida • Oldsmar Cultural Center; Oldsmar, Florida • Cypress Forest Park; Oldsmar, Florida • Kirin Resort; Clearwater, Florida Residential • Buccaneer Condominium Hotel; Treasure Island, Florida • Mariner Estates Subdivision; Hernando County, Florida • Adams Enterprises Subdivision; Oldsmar, Florida • Floyd Road Subdivision; Hillsborough County, Florida • The Banyons Townhomes; Tarpon Springs, Florida • Palm Bluff Preserve Subdivision, Clearwater, Florida • Harrison Village Retail/Condominium; Clearwater, Florida • Becklund Townhomes; Oldsmar, Florida • Chapel Hill MPUD; Pasco County, Florida • Briarwood Subdivision; Safety Harbor, Florida • Omaha Circle Apartments; Hernando County, Florida • Beckett Lake ALF; Clearwater, Florida • LaRisa II; Clearwater, Florida • Alminar Condominium; Clearwater, Florida • Entrada Condominium; Clearwater, Florida • Port Royale Condominium; Dunedin, Florida • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jerry Figurski [fig@fhlaw.net] , Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 3:23 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: resume Two more resumes. Jerry From: INSIDE OUT GROUP [mailto:IOG@KNOLOGY.NET]. Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:07 PM To: Jerry Figurski Subject: resume Clem Papas Inside Out Group, Inc (727) 734-3673 9/18/2006 f O ¦NS?oE ouT CLEM PAPAS WORK EXPERIENCE 1993-PRESENT 1989.1993 1986.1989 EDUCATION 1983.1986 1981.1983 Inside Out Group, Inc Established in 1993 President and Partner Architectural Concepts Project Manager Raymond and Associates Draftsman Louisiana State University B.F.A. 0 Inside Out Group, Inc 812 Louden Avenue Dunedin FL. 34698 Dunedin, FL Largo, FL Palm Harbor, FL Baton Rouge, LA St. Petersburg Junior College St. Petersburg, FL A.A. leading to a bachelors degree in Architecture CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS ON CLEARWATER BEACH Completed Projects: Harbor View Grande C.D.B. approved Condominium Projects in Progress: Palazo Cinnamon Bay Playa Del Sol OTHER COASTAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS 2005 Atlantis West 2004 Del Mar West 2002 Ocean Way Sea Pearls 2001 Mariners Point Sea Star 2000 Captains Cove Cappie Bie 1999 Casa Del Playa 1998 Beachside Villas I Beachside Villas II 1997 Bammaumers 1996 Texa 0 ¦NS?oE o u-r G. JASON MEDERIOS Inside Out Group, Inc 812 Louden Avenue Dunedin FL. 34698 WORK EXPERIENCE 2002-PRESENT Inside Out Group, Inc Dunedin, FL Team Leader, CAD Manager 1997.1998 Mancino Associates Architects East Providence, RI CAD Manager 1995.2002 Architect's Studio Inc. North Easton, MA Lead Designer/ Project Manager EDUCATION 2004.2001 St Petersburg College St. Petersburg, FL 2001-2002 Boston Architectural Center Boston, MA 1995-1996 Massasoit Community College Brockton, MA CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS ON CLEARWATER BEACH Completed Projects: Harbor View Grande C.D.B. approved Condominium Projects in Progress: Palazo Cinnamon Bay Playa Del Sol OTHER COASTAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS 2005 Atlantis West 2004 Del Mar West 2002 Ocean Way r • Wells, Wayne From: Jerry Figurski [fig@fhlaw.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 5:01 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Staff Report for FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Wayne, This seems to go beyond the issue of just the retail which is what I thought would be the only issue as we discussed earlier in the week. I did not think that consistency or compatibility would be issues. Am sending to you a request for additional time for our presentation. Also, if I need to have one of my guys identified as an expert, do I need to do anything other than bring his or their resumes to the meeting? The latter two issues are why I left a message earlier today. will see you hopefully on Friday. Have a good night. Jerry -----original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:12 PM To: keith@keithzayac.com Cc: Jerry Figurski Subject: Staff Report for FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith/Jerry - Attached is the Staff Report for FLD2006-02009 for 490 Mandalay Avenue for the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting, which starts at 1:00 pm. Wayne <<Mandalay 490 Staff Report for 9.19.06 CDB.doc>> 1 i • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:12 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: Gerald (Jerry) Figurski (E-mail) Subject: Staff Report for FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith/Jerry - Attached is the Staff Report for FLD2006-02009 for 490 Mandalay Avenue for the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting, which starts at 1:00 pm. Wayne Mandalay 490 Staff Report for ... c_ A' . . CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos-r Ori:ia: Box 4748, CuI \RWA-n;li, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ???iwll tl MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTu: AVENUE, CLEARWATER, RoRLDA 33756 THLI:PHONB (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING DliVla.01'b11iN1 Rimi:w Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 August 15, 2006 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue) Dear Mr. Zayac: The Community Development Board (CDB) at their meeting on August 15, 2006, continued the above referenced request to their September 19, 2006, meeting. The request is for Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.13, for property located at 490 Mandalay Avenue. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562- 4504. Sincerely, Michael De`lk AIC Planning Director Cc: Jerry Figurski S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIMandalay 490 Gionis Condominiums (T) - 9.19.06 CDB - WMMandalay 490 CDB Continuance Letter 8.15.06doc FRANK 111111 AIM, NIA) ()I, 1()l IN Ih>r,:.?, Can M11%IFNI ::111 IImI 11:?>ni:n,.?, Clx ;ai_n:>ulrr, NIJjONS()v• 0A . ,aunt>nse ® C:VJ.I?\ A. PrrC;,L NCII.NIFNMrr. AND Ai:rn;:.mA i vi[ AcrR N 1?MPLO) P:1\" 0IGURSKI & HARRILP ATTORNEYS AT LAW GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A. J. BEN HARRILL, P.A. DEBRA M. ZAMPETTI July 19, 2006 Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater P.G. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 www.fhlaw.net RE: Mary G. Realty, Inc. FLD2006-020099 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Delk: This firm represents Mary G. Realty, Inc. As indicated to you publicly at the Community Development Board meeting on June 20, 2006, there was a possibility we would need to seek a further continuance. After meeting with staff and with the agreement of staff, we would request a continuance from the August 15, 2006, Community Development Board meeting to September 19, 2006. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. rp ffr'= D J?_',L_ 2 8 2006 PLANNING- & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER TELEPHONE: (727) 942-0733 FAX: (727) 944-3711 Enclosure cc: Mary G. Realty, Inc. Keith Zayac, PE Clem Pappas Jul 25 2006 12:52PM GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A. J. BEN HARRILL, P.A. DEBRA M. ZAMPETTI July 19, 2006 H$SRSERJET 3330 0 FIGURSKI & HARRILL ATTORNEYS AT LAW THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2530 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 www.fhlaw.net Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RE: Mary G. Realty, Inc. FLD2006-020099 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Delk: This firm represents Mary G. Realty, Inc. As indicated to you publicl; Community Development Board meeting on June 20, 2006, there was a po we would need to seek a further continuance. After meeting with staff a the. agreement of staff, we would request a continuance from the August 1; Community Development Board meeting to September 19, 2006. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to c4 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. p.2 :)NE: (727) 942-0733 FAX: (727) 944-3711 at the sibility Id with , 2006, me. Enclosure cc: Mary G. Realty, Inc. Keith Zayac, PE Clem Pappas Jul 25 2006 12:52PM H*RSERJET 3330 1 FIGURSKI & HARRILL THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 Phone Number: (727) 942-0733 Fax Number: (727) 944-3711 1 ? aA Date Sent: July 25, 2006 To: Wayne Wells Fax No: 562-4576 JUL 2 5 2006 r?f<t?? AviCES EP1 ? o From: Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire Re: Total pages, including cover: 2 (If you do not receive all of the pages indicated, please call our office as soon as possible) COMMENTS: CONFIDENTIAL WARNING - THIS TRANSMISSION MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN INFORMATION WHICH IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS TRANSMISSION AND RECEIVED IT IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER IDENTIFIED ABOVE FOR. FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS. F t ° f s r ., C ITY OF C LEARWATE R n ... I7C PLANNING DEPARTMENT . 'gTER4Posr Orru:r Box 4748, CLrnRWATER, Fi.omDA33758-4748 '?.,MIJNICIPAL Sj:wicGs BiJ1I )ING, 100 SoUr1l Mv1<'rI.I: Av WE., Cl.rni<wn,riai, Rom DA 33756 Trc.i:PnoNC (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE- PIANNING DwELOPMENT Rime-,w June 20, 2006 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue) Dear Mr. Zayac: The Community Development Board (CDB) at their meeting on June 20, 2006, continued the above referenced request to their August 15, 2006, meeting. The request is for Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for property located at 490 Mandalay Avenue. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562- 4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director Cc: Jerry Figurski S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wending casesl Up for the next CDBIMandalay 490 Gionis Condominiums (7) - 8.15.06 CDB - WWIMandalay 490 CDB Continuance Letter 6.20.06doc FRA\K 1111M\rn, iMAMR xcn. u;wsrr J nin U( r.?n, Cui Nci10cr\nsr:r I lour I I:Uni wN, (:()( liirr,jOxu)N, C ,nN(.ii.w:wsr:r ® CnWYN A. I'rTITSE\. Cc)( N(:u.MEMBER „I:Q(:ni. I?,?u i w?n:xr AMU Arrm.\cnrn![ Ac.ru N I?.UPr(ATI C GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A. J. BEN HARRILL, P.A. DEBRA M. ZAMPETTI June 16, 2006 40IGURSKI & HARRILP ATTORNEYS AT LAW THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 www.fhlaw.net Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RE: Mary G. Realty, Inc. FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Delk: TELEPHONE: (727) 942-0733 FAX: (727) 944-3711 This firm represents Mary G. Realty, Inc. On behalf of my client, I hereby request a continuance from the June 20, 2006, Community Development Board meeting to August 15, 2006. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Respectfully, GERALD A. FIGUR GAF/mjp Enclosure cc: Mary G. Realty, Inc. Keith Zayac, PE Clem Pappas RECEIVED JUN 19 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Jun 16 2006 2:22PM GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A. J. BEN HARRILL, P.A. DEBRA M. ZAMPETTI June 16, 2006 ASERJET 3330 p.2 FIGURSKI & HARRILL ATTORNEYS AT LAW THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 www.fhlaw.net Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RE: Mary G. Realty, Inc. . FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Delk: TELEPHONE; (727) 942-0733 FAX: (727) 944-3711 This firm represents Mary G. Realty, Inc. On behalf of my client, I hereby request a continuance from the June 20, 2006, Community Development Board meeting to August 15, 2006. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Respec fully, GERALD A. FIGUR GAF/mjp Enclosure cc: Mary G. Realty, Inc. Keith Zayac, PE Clem Pappas DR i JUN 16 2006 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES I CITY OF CLEARWATER Jun 16 2006 2:22PMLRSERJET 3330 AdIk FIGURSKI & HARRILL THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 Phone Number: (727) 942-0733 Fax Number: (727) 944-3 711 Fax Date Sent: To: Fax No: From: Re: June 16, 2006 Wayne Wells 562-4576 Gerald A. Figurski, Esquire Total pages, including cover: 2 (If you do not receive all of the pages indicated, please call our office as soon as possible) P.1 COMMENTS: 1 n LJ `? ?N ti 6 2006 PLONING & DEVELOPMENT SERViC RWATER CITY OF CLEA CONFIDENTIAL WARNING - THIS TRANSMISSION MAY CONTAIN CERTAIN INFORMATION WHICH IS PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THIS TRANSMSSION AND RECEIVED IT IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT THE SENDER IDENTIFIED ABOVE FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS. FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 c- / ??t. t?(`w NAV FAX:_ '7q 3 - 9 ' S•S Phone: 7f .3 - 9 8 AS l Z" 0 133 FROM: _kl_ Phone• S& Z J b DATE:_ / D RE: - D Zp 4 q iv Ma-A JOLW7 A? MESSAGE: S NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)_, Jun. 12 2006 09:18AM YOUR LOGO . YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Jun.12 09:17AM 01'23 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). Jun. 12 2006 09:20AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 99443711 Jun.12 09:19AM 01'12 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY LlSING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 1:27 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: Gerald (Jerry) Figurski (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith/Jerry - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case for the June 20, 2006, CDB meeting (1:00 pm at City Hall). Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne Mandalay 490 Staff Report.doc CITY OF C L E A R W A T E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33758-4748 0 0000 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW May 18, 2006 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2006-02009) Dear Mr. Zayac: The Case No. FLD2006-02009 for Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for property located at 490 Mandalay Avenue, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on June 20, 2006. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, 1? M. w? Wa}die M. Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending cases) Up for the next CDBIMandalay 490 Gionis Condominiums (T) - 620.06 CDB - WWIMandalay 490 CDB Letter.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR Biu.JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER HOYr HAMIJXON, COUNCILMGMBER ® CARLRN A. PIiTERSEN, COUNCIIAIEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND APFIRMAl7V1? ACTION BMPLOYBR" 0 i r y' Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning May 17, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keitha-keithzayac. com RE: FLD2006-02009 490 Mandalay Avenue (Gionis Condominium) Dear, Mr. Wells Enclosed please find 15 sets of information addressing comments received from the incompleteness email dated May Ie, 2006. General Engineering: 5. Show existing and proposed parallel parkng spaces along Mandalay in the vicinity of the location where the driveway is to be removed. a. The existing parallel parking stalls along Mandalay Avenue are depicted on all sheets and two extra public parking stalls have been provided. Fire: 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculation&Water Study by a Fire Protection Engineer to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrade as are required by the developer due to impact of this project. Calculation/Water Study due prior to CDB. a. Attached is a copy of the revised Fire Flow Calculations to show that we tested fire hydrant #1 and not #11 2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a fire pump is required. 100 psi at roof is required. Fire pump to be located above- the BFE. Show proposed location prior to CDB. a. The fire pump has been located on the third living level. Planning: 1. Provide a project value. a. $270.001 sellable square foot ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 17 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 - 0 1P 2 Sheet A3 - Floor plan for the 7" living level indicates a bridge to stair #2. The height of stair #2 for the 7'hfiving level does not appear to have sufficient height, as it appears that the door would cut into the braces for the roof structure. Please check the height and make any necessary changes. . a. Elevation heights have been reviewed and any necessary adjustments have been made. Sincerely, r Richard Marcel Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 1'71006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • Wells, Wayne From: Keith Zayac [keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:35 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue We meant to put $3000.00 it is a very economical plan. Actually there was a zero left out for $30 M ----- Original Message ----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <keith@keithzayac.com> Cc: <richard@keithzayac.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:52 AM Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - These are the still outstanding comments from the DRC that need to be addressed: Engineering: (Scott Rice) 5. Show existing and proposed parallel parking spaces along Mandalay in the vicinity of the location where the driveway is to be removed. 5/12/06 - NOT MET - ADDITIONAL PARALLEL SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THIS AREA AS POSSIBLE. Fire: (Jim Keller) 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 5/15/2006 Condition not met hydrant numbers do not match. (JFK) 2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. Show proposed location PRIOR TO CDB. 5/15/2006 Pump is insufficient shows only 400 gpm. (JFK) Planning: (Wayne Wells) 1.5/15/06 - WW - The project value is only $3,000,000, for a 12 unit condominium project? 3/17/06 - WW - Provide the project value. 2. Sheet A3 - Floor plan for the 7th living level indicates a bridge to Stair #2.'The height of Stair #2 for the 7th living level does not appear to have sufficient height, as it appears that the door would cut into the braces for the roof structure. Please check the height and make any necessary changes. Could you resolve these items by 10:00 am tomorrow (May 17, 2006)? I am trying to set the June 20, 2006, CDB agenda and am trying to place this item on the agenda if possible. Any revised or new written material (application, attachments, site plans, building plans, etc.) need to be resubmitted by this time so that the above departments can review the revisions. Thanks. Wayne 1 • GRINER ENGINEERING, INC. 1 628 FIRST AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33713 PHONE: (727) 822-2335 FAx: (727) 821 3361 TO: City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 727.562.4567 We are sending you via: ? US Mail ? the following items: ? Plans ? LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date 5/17/2006 Job No. 06058 Attention Wayne Wells Re Waterfront Condos Fire Flow & Hydrant Worksheet Preparation COURIERfEDEX#: Fedex ? Courier ? Pick-up ? Drop-off Prints 13 Specifications[] Submittals Copy of Letter COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 05/17/06 Comment/Response Letter - Signed/Sealed 1 05/17/06 Fire Flow & Hydrant Worksheet - Signed/Sealed 1 05/17/06 Flow Test by the City of Clearwater Water Department These are being transmitted Remarks For your use E]As requested ?For review and comment Signed & Sealed Returned [3For Bids Due ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 17 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEAMATER cc: File Sent By: Joseph H. Griner III, P.E. (CLIENT COPY) GRINE0 0 R ENGINEERING, INC. 1628 FIRST AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33713 PHONE: (727) 822-2335 FAx: (727) 821.3361 April 17, 2006 Mr. James Keller Public Works Administration Engineering Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 Clearwater, Florida 33756 Reference: Waterfront Condominiums 490 Mandalay Avenue Clearwater, Florida Griner Engineering Project No. 06058 Dear Mr. Keller: ORIGNAL RECEIVED MAY 17 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The following is our response to the Plan Review Comments that pertain to the Fire Protection System: FIRE PROTECTION Comment 1: Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 05115106 - Condition not met, hydrant numbers do not match. Response: Shall comply. Hydrant number is # 1. Corrected. Comment 2: An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. Show proposed location PRIOR TO CDB. 05115106 - Pump is insufficient, shows only 400 gpm. Response: Shall comply. Please see attached corrected Fire Flow and Hydrant Worksheet. Mr. James Keller May 17, 2006 Page 2 of 2 • °°1c°a°11#1410a P 4%; ,??Yln* if;o, tr?ave any questions. a. ,i,c16ly H. G Pre_ STS+.. ?f o jhg/bh ?•r?ttc°°;°° • ORIGINAL RECENED MAY 17 2006. PLANNING DEPAWMEW CITY OF CLEARWAiER Attachments Clearwater Fire & Rescue o Cka-mater 610 Franklin Street -Clearwater, Florida 33756 Public Works Administration - Engineering Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756 FIRE FLOW & HYDRANT WORKSHEET (Revised 03/29/2006) This worksheet is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fire Pump before any permits for new building construction, building expansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply with Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 - Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to include applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) and AWWA M-17 - Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Fire Hydrants. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Waterfront Condominium RECEIVED Project Address: 490 Mandalay Avenue - Clearwater, Florida 33767 MAY 171006 PLM MNG DEPARTMENT Cft A; e, GENERAL WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant: Mandalay Ave. and Baymont St. Hydrant #: Size of Water Main Supplying Fire Flow: 6" Looped System or Dead End Water Main? Looped Static: 57 psi Residual: 47 psi Pitot: 43 psi Flow: 1,110 gpm Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Riser: Horizontal 150 Ft. Vertical Elevation 2(+/-) Ft. Hydrant Test Conducted by: City of Clearwater - Keith Zayac (Include/Attach Copy of Actual Test Sheet) NFPA HAZARD CLASSIFICATION Area # 2 Classification Description of Hazard Protected (Commodity Description, Storage Height and Arrangement, if applicable): Ordinary Garage Light Hazard Living Area Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary Page 1 of 3 DESIGN PARAMETERS Area # System Type Area (sq. ft.) Density (gpm/ft) Inside Hose (gpm) Outside Hose (gpm) 1. Wet 1500 (caic.) 0.15 0 250 2. Wet 850 0.1 0 100 oROINAL A 10 ?,! z 7 2006 14J%% u4G DEPARTMENT Citf 07 t Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary 750 gpm (Auto-Wet- Total Needed Fire Flow (N.F.F.) Standpipe) Is Existing System Supply Sufficient to Meet N.F.F. Above? N/A No Yes CODES AND STANDARDS System Component Applicable NFPA Standard / Year Edition and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes Sprinkler System NFPA - 13 2002 Edition Manual Standpipe - Wet NFPA - 14 2003 Edition Fire Pump NFPA - 20 2003 Edition Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary If Project Includes Fire Pump, Supply the Following: Fire Pump Information: Pump Capacity: 750 gpm Churn Pressure: 173 Rated Pressure: 120 psi Pressure @ 150% Flow: 112 On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?): 0 PREPARER / SPECIFIER INFORMATION Preparer Name: Joseph H. Griner, III, P.E. Company Name: Griner Engineering Inc. Mailing Address: 1628 First Avenue North City: Saint Petersbu State: FL Phone: 727.822.2335 zip: 33713 Fax: 727.821.3361 ,taese?j?? a4? •••• a••.., i Ad V • y . TATS : F , r ?•+? . AN °.cw . • 0 P.E. Seal Fa?at::•e••' Page 2 of 3 i_11I!_IT.I? PAGE n ' v FLOW "FI ST w_ G;TY Or CL.EAPV41A t ER WP.,TER DEPA' Rl.MEPJT J Lino Or. TZ!S ILI c. PSI raT?c: _.__....... _. prrU r __ PSI ?i ---? ` -- -- IL -GPM I K ' I Ct;STG'REF2 RF-gUE5TINGTEST_.__._ " ORIGINAL RICINED MAY 1'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 05/17/2006 10:35 7278213361 GRINER ENGINEERING PAGE 01 1628 First Avenue North • ?:: St. Petersburg, Florida 33713 Tel.727.822.2335 G R I lei E R Fax.727.821.3361 ENGINEERING' I N C wow Griner-engineering. net To: Mr. Wayne Wells (Planning Dept.) Company: City of Clearwater Planning Department From: Dana Riiska Fax: 727.562.4865 Phone: 727.562.4567 Date: May 17, 2006 Reference: Permit No. 2006-02009 490 Mandalay Avenue Comment Responses Project #: 06058 Number of Pages (including cover): 4 Message: Mr. Wells, as we discussed on the phone this morning, here are the responses to the comment from Jim Keller on 5/15/2006. The permit number for this job is 2006-02009 and the address is 490 Mandalay Av. Clearwater, Florida. All of the comments were to be in your office by 10:00 a.m. today. Thank you, Dana Dana A. Riiska P.E. Griner Engineering dana(Mariner-encineerinra. net 727-8222335 x 333 cc: Sent by: Dana Riiska Dt5CLAIMER: The Information contained in this message may be pelvilcged and confidential and protected from di9ci690e. If the reader of this message Is not the Intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for deitvering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. if you have received this communication in error, please notify us Immediately and destroy the paper copy received via facsimile. Thank you. 05/17/2006 10:35 7278213361 • GRINER ENGINEERING PAGE 02 1 GRINER ENGINEERING, INC. 1628 FIRST AVENUE NORTH ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33713 April 17, 2006 Mr. James Keller Public Works Administration Engineering Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 Clearwater, Florida 33756 Reference: Waterfront Condominiums 490 Mandalay Avenue Clearwater, Florida Griner Engineering Project No. 06058 Dear Mr. Keller: : (727) 822-2335 PHONJ FAx: (727) 821-3361 The following is our response to the flan Review Comments that pertain to the Fire Protection System: FIRE PROTECTION Comment 1: Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 05115106 - Condition not met, hydrant numbers do not match. Response: Shall comply. Hydrant number is # 1. Corrected. Comment 2: An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. Show proposed location PRIOR TO CDB. 05115106 - Pump is insufficient, shows only 400 gpm. Response: Shall comply. Please see attached corrected Fire Flow and Hydrant Worksheet. 05/17/2006 10:35 7278213361 • Mr. James Feller May 17, 2006 Page 2 of 2 Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, r vN ? oseph H. G r TII, .E. President jhg/bh Attachments GRINER ENGINEERING • PAGE 03 05/17/2006 10:35 7278213361 GRINER ENGINEERING PAGE 04 u Clearwater Fire & Rescue 610 Franklin Street -- Clearwater, Florida 33756 Public Works Administration - Engineering Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756 (Revised 03/2912006) This worksheet is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fire Pump before any permits for new building construction, building expansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater- Information and design must comply with Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 - Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to include applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13,13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) and AWWA M-17 - Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Fire Hydrants. Project Name: Waterfront Condominium Project Address: 490 Mandalay Avenue - Clearwater, Florida 33767 ............. 77-1 GENESS ..... riwi ,l>wv;+lal,, IW •!li?NTERSY Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant: Mandalay Ave. and Ba mont St. Hydrant #: Size of Water Main Supplying Fire Flow: 6' Looped System or Dead End Water Main? Looped static: 67 psi Residual: 47 psi Pitot 43 psi Flow: 1,110 gpm Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Riser. Horizontal 150 Ft. Vertical Elevation 2(+/-) Ft. Hydrant Test Conducted by: Ci of Clearwater- Keith Za ac (IncludefAttech Copy of Actual Test Sheet) - ni; - ..N A?H;Ii`F1r'1? Area# 2. Classification Description of Hazard Protected (Commodity pesc*Uon, Storage Height and Arrangement f/ appilcable): OrdinM Garage Light Hazard Living Area Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary Page 1 of 3 05/17/2006 10:35 7278213361 GRINER ENGINEERING PAGE 05 ?d??:,,,?: ..?,?n,? a???in•c... ?;in;M1:1:;.?" '+?knG_: ''??- o?i??9i>it:??rl:il?.a'J???.? ""•:fi„ 71 AMIYIMRS. D.EStN P Area # System Type Area (sq. ft) Densfty (gpm/R) inside Hose (gpm) Outside Hose (gpm) 1. Wet 1500 (Calc.) 0.15 0 250 2. Wet 850 0.1 0 100 Attach Addiffonal Sheers if Necessary 750 gpm (Auto--Wet- Total Needed Fire Flow (N.F.F.) Standpipe) Is Existing System Supply Sufficient to Meet N.F.F. Above? N/A No Yes CODES AND::STA,NDARDS' 1.' System Component Applicable NFPA Standard/ Year Edr7ion and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes Sprinkler System _ NFPA -13 2002 Edition Manual Standpipe - Wet NFPA -14 2003 Edition Fire Pump NFPA 20 2003 Edition Attach Adddlonaf Sheets Y Necessary If Project Includes Fire Pump, Supply the Fallowing: Fire Pump Information: Pump Capacity: 750 gpm Chum Pressure: 173 psi Rated Pressure: 120 psi Pressure a 150% Flow: 112 psi On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?): 0 PR P -SPECIFIER INFORMAATI+DN '? Preparer Name: Joseph H. Griner, III, P.E. Company Name: Griner Engineering Inc. Mailing Address: 1628 First Avenue North _ city: Saint Petersburg State: FL Phone: 727.822.2335 zip: 33713 Fax: 727.821.3361 Page 2 of 3 05/17/2006 10:35 7: 14 c_?!?a. 2C@$ 3 r F--T - - ?pA7? CT Te3T 7278213 1 711750d?5 'PAGE D? GRINER ENGINEER PLFEL i UT Ti- I7xf stow Y - I ?r 8_t ! 2??ac PAGE 06 MER REMESTING LEST FLOW TEST G(TY OF MSAP44ATER WATER pgPAMUIT 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:53 AM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Cc: 'richard@keithzayac.com' Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - These are the still outstanding comments from the DRC that need to be addressed: Engineering: (Scott Rice) 5. Show existing and proposed parallel parking spaces along Mandalay in the vicinity of the location where the driveway is to be removed. 5/12/06 - NOT MET - ADDITIONAL PARALLEL SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THIS AREA AS POSSIBLE. Fire: (Jim Keller) 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 5/15/2006 Condition not met hydrant numbers do not match. (JFK) 2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. Show proposed location PRIOR TO CDB. 5/15/2006 Pump is insufficient shows only 400 gpm. (JFK) Planning: (Wayne Wells) d 1.5/15/06 - WW - The project value is only $3,000,000, for a 12 unit condominium project? 3/17/06 - WW - Provide the project value. 12. Sheet A3 - Floor plan for the 7th living level indicates a bridge to Stair #2. The height of Stair #2 for the 7th living level does not appear to have sufficient height, as it appears that the door would cut into the braces for the roof structure. Please check the height and make any necessary changes. Could you resolve these items by 10:00 am tomorrow (May 17, 2006)? 1 am trying to set the June 20, 2006, CDB agenda and am trying to place this item on the agenda if possible. Any revised or new written material (application, attachments, site plans, building plans, etc.) need to be resubmitted by this time so that the above departments can review the revisions. Thanks. Wayne t ' r Keith Zayac & Associate lac. Civil Enaineering. Landscape Architecture, Planning May 10, 2006 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-3888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith cC ,keithzayac.cor, ORIGINAL RECEIVED Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater MAY 11 2006 Planning Department PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. Myrtle Ave. CITY OF CLEARWATER Clearwater, FL RE: FLD2006-02009 490 Mandalay Avenue (Gionis Condominium) Dear, Mr. Wells Enclosed please find 15 sets of information addressing comments received from the incompleteness letter dated March 30th, 2006. General Engineering: 1. Replace sidewalk detail (sheet 3 of 6) with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standard Index #109. a. On sheet 3 of 6 we have added the City of Clearwater's sidewalk specifications and details. 2. Relocate concrete driveway note on plan to driveway on north side of site. a. On sheet 3 of 6 the driveway note which states, "Concrete driveway shall be 6" thick, 3,000 PSI finer mesh with 6"x6" l 10x10 wwm (typ.)" has been moved to the entrance on the north. 3. Accessing the sanitary manhole as proposed will require extensive resurfacing and restoration of asphalt and pavement Applicant shall instead install a doghouse manhole in the Baymont Street right-of-way to reduce traffic impact and restoration cost. a. On sheet 4 of 6 the sanitary line has been revised to connect to the existing 8" sanitary line located on Baymont Street. 4. Sheet #6 will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. a. Acknowledged 5. Show existinq and proposed parallel parldig spaces along Mandalay in the vicinity of the location where the driveway is to be removed a. The existing parallel parking stalls along Mandalay Avenue are depicted on all sheets and will not be modified. .--,f The following to be addressed prior to building permit Use sewer lateral and c/eanout detail #305. a. Acknowledged Environmental: 1. No issues Fire: 0 ORIGINAL k?-C= ?"mn MAT 11 2006 PLANNING ULFAimviv;4 CITY OF CLEARWATEk 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations Water Study by a Fire Protection Engineer to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrade as are required by the developer due to impact of this project. Calculafion/Water Study due prior to CDB. a. Attached is a copy of the Fire Flow Calculation/Water Study for your review. 2. An automafic Class i standpipe system with a fire pump is required. 100 psi at roof is required. Fire pump to be located above the BFE. Show proposed location prior to CDB. a. Location of the fire pump room is on third living level and is located above B.F E 3. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. Prior to CDB a. Fire sprinklersystem shall conform to 2002 NFPA. 4. This building is a high-rise building as measured from the street level which is the lowest Fire Department vehicle access/setup point As such you must meet the requirements for high-rise buildings per NFPA 101 to include fire control room, generator, pressurized stairways, voice evacuation fire alarm system, smoke protected elevator lobbies. (this list is not all inclusive) Acknowledge prior to CDB. a. Building is a high rise and shall conform to NFPA 101. 5. Both stairways must exit directly outside building The SW stair is exifing into garage area. Show on plan prior to CDB. a. See ground floor plan. Stairs exit directly outside of building. 6. The travel distance within the living units exceeds the 125' limit as required by NFPA 101.30.2.6.2. Modify to show the change prior to CDB. a. Travel distance is within 125' Limit, see floor plans dashed line. Harbor Master 1. No Issues Legal: 1. No Issues Land Resources: 1. No issues Landscaping: ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 12 2006 P ET CITY OF CLEARWATER Sheet 516 - Indicate in the plant list what landscape material is being placed in the 'blank" areas (sod)? a. On sheet 5 of 6 text callouts have been added to the plans which depict the typical location of sodded areas. Parks and Recreation: 1. Open spacelrecroation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculation the assement a. Acknowledged. Stormwater: Prior to issuance of building permit the applicant needs to provide the following: a. A copy of the approved SWFWMD permit of letter of exemption b. Soil borings, water table elevation and double ring inS/trometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention area. c. A right-of-way permit shall be required for any storm work in the Mandalay right- of-way. i. Acknowledged. Solid Waste: 1. No Issues. Traffic Engineering: 1. No Issues. Planning: 1. Revise the civil plans and building elevations to comply with the following flexible development criteria for attached dwellings: `Off-street parking within the footprint of residential building is designed and constnrcted to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. a. Elevations have been designed to create a street level facade. 2. The indentation of the building north of the elevator should be dashed in as "building line above," much like to rest of the building has been. a. See ground floor plan. ORIGINAL 3. Provide a project value. RECEIVED a. 3.000.000 three million dollars MAY 112006 4. Sheet 316- Complete General Note #15. PLANNING DEPA, ;ENT CITY OF CLEARVi;jp a. On sheet 3 of 6 note number 15 has been revised to state, "there are no utility easements identified by the survey. 5. Revise Attachment `B" to the application to include the reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to zero fleet (to trash staging area). a. 6 All proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) must be placed underground a. On sheet 4 of 6 note number 17 has been added to the plans which states, "All proposed utilities shall be installed underground." 7. Potential conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by the CDB. a. Revise colors & elevations. 8 Potential conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report That a Unity of Tale be recorded in the public records prior to issuance of any permits. a. Acknowledged. 9. Potential conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. a. Acknowledged. 10. Potential condi6oons of approval to be included in the Staff Report That future signage meet the requirements of code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of building. z W a. Acknowledged. o 1. Potential conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report, a _ C W ¢ That all fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. O a. Acknowledged. ? z O Z it-:12 Pbt6r*al conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report U That all utifity equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to issuance of the first Ceri ficate of Occupancy. a. Acknowledged. 13. Potential conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report That all parks and recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. a. Acknowledged. 14. Potential conditions of approval to be included in the Staff Report' That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide%btain the following. 1. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption. 11. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infittrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and 111. A Cityright-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. a. Acknowledged. 15. There is an inconsistency between the architectwal plans at the southeast comer of the building. The roof plans and the east and south elevations seem to indicate one layout of the building (with an indentation at the comer), which doesnT agree with the floor plan and sde plan (which has it filled in). Which is correct? a. Have been corrected. 16. West Elevation - There is too much balcony being shown for the western units for the five floors above the ground level parking (part of hang room would be balcony, which is not shown on the floor plan)). Revise. a. Revised 17. Provide a floor plan for living Floors 6 and 7 a. Provided 18. Portions of the building, especially on the east (which wr71 be viewed by the traveling public) and west sides, that is rather bland West watt of units on Living Levels 6 and 7 are virtual blank walls. Improvements is necessary to the fagade, through vertical or horizontal banding, variation in building colors, increased fenestrs ion, balconies, buikOng ornamentation, etc (or combinations of these others). This relates to the Flexible Development criteria for attached dweiCngs for Weigtr whereby Oft increased height resuils in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance ." a. Revised elevations, added more decorative elements. 19. East Elevation - Floor plans indicate two windows in bedroom #3. Revise. a. Revised 20. Provide on the building elevations the height of the proposed building from BFE to the midpoint of the main pitched roof above the Level 7 unit z U a. See elevations ?Q o 21. General Applicability criteria #1 response. Provide detaNs (relating to the surrounding projec(s) o N a d of how this project will be in harmony with the scale, bulb coverage, density and character of r+ o `-? adjacent properties. Unclear of the statement 'The project will set a positive standard for the O U r-+ z „V Z ui neighborhood..."since Belle Harbor is built, Mandalay Beach Club is buff, Sandpearl is under i U l ar of f t O r O a¢ z nc e ure expans on). u construc hon, and Pelican Walk exists across the street (with its V the intent of the statement `The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded archdectwal finishes and textures" as to whether this relates to the a, interior of the units or the exterior of the building. Advisehevise. a. Exterior elevations have been revised to harmonize with surrounding projects. The height of the building is in scale with Sandpeart yet footprint is much smaller. 22. General AppTcabirriyrreena #5response : unclear ifthe response was written for this project since this project is not on Bay Esplanade. Revise. a. The Sandpearl, which keeps the mass at a human scale. The more intimate scale was also continued with fenestration balconies & Architectural elements. Such is finishes & textures 05/1642006 08:51 7277239 ZAVAC PAGE 06 23. MK* by Ds*n Gtads6 *s stet that tits function of Me buAft is not reawy apparent except at Pam orsprt i mi " it is unctew,, based on the 86WOns provided, how this provision is being stet Adwellp4te%*, a. That stsam«n is 041. Owl was obam R thtl W+aetrtsss of a typlW panting parses & passant a p-..shtg twwto tut. strrst. 24. Afadbm rut 9"- ChWis 01 a. lt+t?vids wetlteen Ir bffradon as to haw the Ina vlOW height 18 "moultlng in an frtgNawd badki ft dMiprl ad appowarKa 25 Pint %" reeportaas to the adlcsdiwat W<adtad dwef6ng" Flexible Devsbpment a*rra in stthr.'h 1 B w b HOW O& proposal is in oompftncs w ib ffm cx bda: a. tall a ve and wiakh: The reducoon in lot area AW rid result In a btrtf krV whaft is out of scale wit axk tg buddUtgs in the imrn to wxe * of V* psrvel "used for dava"mrret b Loceb Tim use of tt t9 pwoN proposed for development *0 not kwok a dr8d access b an en*W abtt?st a OfF,etrW parts V 1. The physical clwwter? o( a proposed bu lime are such that ft Maly uses of the property wllr require Ti mw pa *kv spaces per Moor area Ow Odwnv*s reqAW or that the use of sUnsPcant porf?ons of the &A ft Aar sbage of other non- padit demawtasnwafog purposes or tune nature of the fndMdual dw o ft units and OW boMbn Is No* to kW to depwxkm icy on non-auiorrrobde modes of bansportedw, 2. 09~ porky g wtftn go fboq mt of the mardentbt Uok tg is des+gned and co mh pj d¦d fa create a sbaet hwal thpad o conwarade to the &vhltedwW dwrader and Nubhes ofs r owdMlisl bugding wt'Kxd perAnV on doe ground level d. T1ts din of aR buribfng oorrwkw with the Tounst District Oeow guideli m to Div wn 5 of wilde 3. (L 9. beach by Dest n Design Guidelines). 1. S" archlfs end pbtns 26 Atfec?arlsnt & Otero #12 a: Revise the response to ttte curmntpmposal (no radludion to paww wtt only a radiation to a bait stagsrg arse). a. ada?aMsdpad 27, Adadurad & Omwk 82 b: Rowse the response to MMus want proposes (no reduction to paverttart arty a ne&Cibn to a fiaah area). a. acknawkdgsd 2& ffte More been anyoartWerabbn given to ft outing lou MOM for the two resid r*W h7Ag la tune wAt OW south tbr Me Sarx0ead ~ (xd* lnkvmWan avabble at the Bukkq D wwbnw* and the layout of the unit in those adjacent tomwe to relation to the bukfkV and wW Ihytwt ftpr tints p(npoeal? 7M current pn* oW has an abrast &mw layout on a nattvbouth bow where to ft w* doovs are omnhOy at the rear of ft units and guests must pass by beabooms (pivots areas) through a b m ha/way bakwe they reach the fMng area (pub)k area) of Ow units. Has a ditrterent unit configuration been corwAved wtwe urns would be a mirth and south unk moan squarish in srxa, with a oenhW alavator and atairs (2) that could sW have a *xWpoW ofaiwttetion to Mandalay Avenue? The top two unnts coaW slut be stacked to a Mannar ailing b tfte Ownarrt p?pposal, but depon tg at the better bastion of the pod on the north side v+arsua to sa o side tithe bukbV (sun angles). Babaniss kw ft unts owN then be on Mme, sides tithe un ta, potently produdnp a ffagede that OnT so Maeda Mincing AbndciyAvsrtr* Adlr>Iararalty, eonsiderfrtg the devokpment and ctlevstopbtg chorsa r along Mandalay Ave" South of eaywnortt Sbset where bu ffi* gs are at a (or chose to a) sera ftnt setback, Staff would prefer that the building be located closer to the Mandalay Avenue property line (yes, a front setback reduction would be necessary). a. We gave a lot of consideration to the orientation of our building. The view of the gulf was our heiracrhey and established precedent North orientation is a desirable light. No direct sunrrght We have also studied Sandpearls plans for a different orientation of the building. The lower balconies of the Sandpead hinder are U ree floors. Instead of puffing the pool on the roof one wanted to create a sense of space for the pool. We revised the exterior elevations on Mandalay Avenue to create a sense of neighborhood. 29. Revise Page 1 of the application to corroct the parcel number to 081291151163981000/0570. a. Sincerely, 9Richard Marcel Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Z Uj WCC W G O ? Q N W J U v U v ld Z Q C F U n_ 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:37 PM To: 'Keith Zayac' Subject: RE: Waterfront (Gionis Condos) Correct. -----Original Message----- From: Keith Zayac [mailto:keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:25 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Waterfront (Gionis Condos) The plan is changing but I am not going to be able to make April 27th. Is the next date May 25th? Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax ----- Original Message ----- From: Wayne.Wells(abmyClearwater.com To: keith(cD_keithzayac.com Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:21 PM Subject: RE: Waterfront (Gionis Condos) Keith - 1) If the plan is not going to change, then you need to resubmit by May 11, 2006, for the June 20, 2006, CDB meeting. 2) If the plan is going to be changed, then it needs to go back to DRC and it should be resubmitted by April 27, 2006, for the June 1, 2006, DRC meeting. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Keith Zayac [ma i Ito: keith@ keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:57 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Waterfront (Gionis Condos) Wayne, what would be our schedule of submittal to revise per your meeting with Inside Out Group and resubmit. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 727-793-9888 phone 727-793-9855 fax 4/24/2006 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: . 9 ?-+ - 3 77)l Phone: 9A-2,- 0-733 _ 4S'8 + FROM: -Phone:--S L'4 DATE:_ 3I ZI 1 U U RE: 4 7 0 tom. ?i? V ?. MESSAGE: ? C? 1Jl?C GSM y?-r?J NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) S *V Mar. 29 2006 05:07PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 99443711 Mar.29 05:05PM 02'15 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). • • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:25 PM To: 'Richard Marcel' Subject: RE: Gionis DRC Richard - The DRC meeting for this case is scheduled for 11:20 am tomorrow in our offices. Attached is the Draft DRC comments. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Richard Marcel [mailto:Richard@Keithzayac.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 1:21 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gionis DRC Wayne, I understand we have a DRC meeting tomorrow morning at 10:00am. Could you please forward me over the comments and double check the DRC time for me? Thank you, Richard Marcel Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Suite 404 Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 Phone: 727-793-9888 Cell: 727-271-3110 Fax: 727-793-9855 DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. (KZA) makes the electronically stored data available for information purposes only. No warranty, either expressed or implied, is made regarding the accuracy or reliability of the aforementioned data. KZA reserves the right to revise, update, and improve its electronically stored data without notice and assumes no responsibility for any images which may arise as a result of the use of its data. The user agrees to verify the data to ascertain its accuracy for the intended use. KZA makes every effort to ensure the data is virus free; however, KZA assumes no responsibility for damages caused by the installation/ use of the enclosed data. Use of the enclosed data indicates the user accepts the conditions contained herein. Please note, in some cases final approval may not have been issued by all the permitting agencies; hence, modifications, which are not depicted on the enclosed electronically stored data, may be required. Unless other arrangements have been agreed to, use of the electronically stored data for any activities shall proceed solely at the risk and responsibility of recipient/user of said electronically stored data. Additionally, any use of the enclosed electronically stored data shall relieve KZA and/or any of its employees from liability/responsibility regarding any modifications to said electronically stored data which may be required due to reviewing agencies' comments and/or final design revisions/modifications. 3/29/2006 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:50 AM To: 'keith@keithzayac.com' Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2006-02009 (490 Mandalay Avenue - Gionis Condo's) Keith I am sending this to you on behalf of Wayne. Please find attached the DRC conditions for the 03/30/06 meeting in regards to the above referenced case. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.teffto-)myclearwater.com i Mandalay 490 - DRC Conditions ... • Wells, Wayne From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:57 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLD2006-02009 (490 Mandalay Avenue - Gionis Condo's) -----Original Message----- From: keith@keithzayac.com [mailto:keith@keithzayac.com] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:53 AM To: Tefft, Robert Subject: Re:FLD2006-02009 (490 Mandalay Avenue - Gionis Condo's) Please be advised that I will be out of the office until April 3rd, 2006. Thank you, Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. 1 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 2:28 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - Attached is a Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original letter will be sent to you via mail. Wayne '+ letter of repleteness 3.6.06., LL CITY OF CLRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM March 06, 2006 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Suite 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 RE: FLD2006-02009 -- 490 MANDALAY AVE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-02009. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on March 30, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III 11 w? Letter of Completeness - FLD2006-02009 - 490 MANDALAYAVE Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning March 6, 2006 Mr. Wayne Wells City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-02009 490 MANDALAY AVE Dear Mr. Wells, 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith(a keithzayac.com EB 9351 LC26000212 Enclosed please find 15 sets of the revised application package addressing comments received dated February 28, 2006 including the following items: 1. A narrative describing the stormwater control plan has been added to the drainage calculations 2. The building has been slightly relocated to provide the required 15 ft. front building and pavement setbacks. 3. An additional sidewaik has been added to provide an accessible path from the stairs to the public sidewalk. A 5 eft wide path has also been provided from the lobby to the public sidewalk. 4. One set of paint sample/chips is enclosed. 5. 1 have initialed that a traffic impact study is not required per our BPRC meeting. 6. Additional wheel stops have been added. 7. The driveway along Mandalay Avenue has been deleted and the project remains a Flexible Application. 8. The building has been revised to provide a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finish of the remaining residential building. 9. The following sufficiency items are also addressed in this resubmittal: The property lines have been darkened • The driveway apron on Mandalay has been deleted ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING Cgly OF C ER WATER The concrete entrance sidewalk has been reduced in size and the trash staging area placed next to the north driveway. • The balcony extensions have been revised to reflect a 15 foot setback from the property line. • The front setback delineation along Baymont Street has been revised to 15 ft. Sincerely, Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA President Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAR 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LL +CITYOFCLE_RWATER o Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM February 28, 2006 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East Suite 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 RE: FLD2006-02009 -- 490 MANDALAY AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-02009. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. 2. Provide on Sheet 3/6 the dimension from the front property line along Baymont Street to the closest point of the building (note: it appears a reduction to the front setback requirement of 15 feet is necessary [looks to be approximately 12 feet to the closest corner of the building on the first floor] to be included in the request - also revise the Description of Request and under "Setbacks" for "General Notes" on Sheet 3/6). Additionally, the front setback to pavement is less than 10 feet (not as dimensioned and indicated in the General Notes on Sheet 3/6). 3. Provide the location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. As indicated at the BPRC predevelopment meeting, an accessible sidewalk is required to be provided from the building to the public sidwalk in the right-of-way (not shown). Additionally, it was also pointed out at the BPRC meeting that the Building Code will require an accessible path from the stairs to a public way and the stairs are not allowed to exit into the parking garage. Revise. 4. Provide one set of the paint samples/chips for the proposed exterior of the building. 5. On the application form, acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 6. Wheel stops are required for the southern three parking spaces. 7. The request must be revised to include a deviation from the following criteria (due to southern driveway on Mandalay Avenue): "The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street." This also requires filing a "Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project" application form. Revise application forms and responses to criteria. Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2006-02009 - 490 MANDALAYAYE tLL 0 CITY OF CLLkRWATER o clearWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING u 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER. COM February 28, 2006 8. Revise civil plans and building elevations to comply with the following flexible development criteria for attached dwellings: "Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level." 9. While not a completeness issue, please revise the following with the resubmittal: 1. The property lines are too light. Please darken. 2. The driveway apron in the Mandalay Avenue right-of-way does not line up with the south side of the drive on-site (nor the painted stop line). 3. If the southern driveway onto Mandalay Avenue is an exit only, and there is a median in Mandalay Avenue preventing northbound left turns into this driveway, unclear why the driveway has been designed as if there is a right-in turning movement that also revises the parallel parking within the right-of-way (which is not being shown on the plans as to revisions proposed). 4. A 10'x10' trash staging area is indicated next to the front property line of Mandalay Avenue, yet it is drawn at 10'x15'. Also unclear is the need for the close to 15'x20' concrete area west of this trash staging area. 5. The indentation of the building north of the elevator should be dashed in as "building line above" rather than a solid line, much like the rest of the building has been depicted. 6. Based on the floor plan submitted and the civil plans indicating the proposed setback of the building from Mandalay Avenue, there are two projections from the main face of the building for bedroom #2 and the kitchen that extend into the front required setback of 15 feet, which are not correctly depicted on the civil plans. Revise the civil plans to correctly depict these projections and provide the distance these projections go into the front setback (Code provides a maximum projection of 24 inches). 7. Sheet 3/6 appears to indicate by a dashed line the required setbacks, however, a front setback of 15 feet is required along Baymont Street (the dashed line scales at only 10 feet). If this dashed line is to indicate the required setback line, revise to 15 feet along/parallel to Baymont Street. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 10:00 am on Monday, March 6, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2006-01009 - 490 MANDALAYAVE Y LL *CITY OF CLLI RWATER o ClearWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM February 28, 2006 Wayne Wells- Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2006-02009 - 490 MANDALAYAVE Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:52 AM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Keith - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original Letter will be sent via mail. Wayne lf?j letter of completeness 2.28.. CDB Meeting Date: September 19, 2006 C RI INAL Case Number: FLD2006-02009 C Agenda Item: DI Owners/Applicants: Mary G Realty, Inc. Representative: Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA, Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Addresses: 490 Mandalay Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT UPDATE: At their meeting on June 20. 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) continued this application, at the applicant's request, to the August 15, 2006, agenda in order to address Staff concerns. In order to allow Staff adequate time to review the revised drawings and revise the Staff Report, the CDB approved the applicant's request to continue this case to the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting. GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain and trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain, pergolas and raised platform) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.13. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.4 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Shopping center with retail sales and restaurant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (12 condominiums) Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 1 of 10 ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation use (under LAND USES: construction - Sandpearl) East: Tourist District; Shopping center (retail sales and restaurants), retail sales South: Tourist District; Attached dwellings and retail sales (under construction - Sandpearl) West: Tourist District; Attached dwellings (under construction - Sandpearl) CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a tourist-dominated area with retail sales and restaurants catering to tourists along Mandalay Avenue. High-rise attached dwelling complexes exist to the south (Mandalay Beach Club) and to the northeast (Belle Harbor). The Sandpearl project is under construction to the north (hotel), to the west (high-rise attached dwellings) and to the south (low-rise attached dwellings over retail sales fronting on Mandalay Avenue). The Pelican Walk shopping center exists across Mandalay Avenue, which has been approved to add a four-story parking garage with three additional floors with 28 attached dwellings where the parking lot currently exists (building permit application submitted and being reviewed). ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.4 acres is located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. The site is basically a rectangle, but with the Mandalay Avenue side being slightly longer in length. The site is currently developed with a small shopping center of 6,254 square feet of five commercial units and a restaurant. The existing building and other site improvements will be demolished. This site is located in the "Destination Resort" District of Beach by Design. Property to the north is currently being developed with the Sandpearl hotel of 253 rooms (height of 95 feet). The property to the west and south is currently being developed as part of the Sandpearl project with a high-rise residential building to the west (height of 150 feet) and a low-rise residential building to the south over ground-level retail sales floor area (approximately 8,300 square feet) directly fronting on Mandalay Avenue (height of 48.5 feet). The property at the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street has been developed with the Belle Harbor high-rise residential project (two towers of heights of 99 and 130 feet). The property to the east across Mandalay Avenue is developed with one and two story retail sales buildings and the two-story Pelican Walk shopping center. A four-story parking garage with three additional residential floors of 28 attached dwelling units (70-foot height) has been approved to replace the existing parking lot for the Pelican Walk shopping center (FLD2004-09072/TDR2005-01015, approved by the CDB on April 19, 2005). Building permits for this Pelican Walk construction have been submitted and are being reviewed. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 2 of 10 Proposal: The proposal includes the construction of a 12-unit residential building 82.5 feet tall (to mid-point of pitched roof). Two dwellings per floor with approximately 2,407 square feet of conditioned living area for the west unit and 2,510 square feet of conditioned living area for the east unit are proposed on the first five residential floors. The sixth floor contains one dwelling unit of 2,510 square feet of conditioned living area and a pool and recreation area on the west side. The seventh floor contains one dwelling unit of 2,510 square feet of conditioned living area. A total of 25 parking spaces are proposed, primarily located under the building. The proposal meets or exceeds required setbacks to the south and west. The redesigned proposal includes reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain and trash staging area) and reductions to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain, pergolas and raised platform) (see discussion below). The building will have a refuse collection room on the ground floor on the south side of the parking level. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer developments. An increase to building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) is included in this proposal. The Tourist District allows a height of 35 feet that may be increased to a maximum height of 100 feet, based upon meeting certain criteria. The proposed height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area (see heights of buildings under "Site Location and Existing Conditions" above). It is also noted that the Mandalay Beach Club between Papaya and San Marco Streets west of Mandalay Avenue were approved/constructed at a height of 145 feet. The site is within a Flood Zone A and the Building Code does not permit habitable area of a residential building to be situated below Base Flood Elevation (BFE). Building height requirements by Code provisions are measured from BFE. Based on these provisions, as well as having to meet vertical clearance requirements for handicap parking spaces, this usually means that parking for the project is accommodated on the ground floor and the building height is increased accordingly. The proposal includes 25 parking spaces on the ground level, which exceeds the minimum Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit, accessed from a driveway from Baymont Street. The site today has driveways on both Baymont Street and Mandalay Avenue. The driveway on Mandalay Avenue will be removed and a sidewalk consistent with that existing on Mandalay Avenue will be constructed, along with two additional parallel on-street parking spaces. A grassed retention area is proposed on the west side of the site between the proposed building and the Sandpearl parking garage. The site will be landscaped along its perimeter with trees (Queen palms and Sabal palms), shrubs (hibiscus, india hawthorn and viburnum) and ground cover (big blue lily turf and sod). Code permits only 75 percent of the required trees to be palms. Should this request be approved, the landscape plan would need to be amended to include at least 25 percent of shade trees. The proposed building has been designed using a Mediterranean architectural theme. The ground level parking level and the first living floor utilizes a diamond-scored stucco painted smokey Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 3 of 10 topaz. The seventh living floor also utilizes this same diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz. The exterior of living floors two through six are finished with stucco painted "restrained gold. Insets finished with the same diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz are proposed on the facades of the stairwells on the south side of the building. Quoins to accent the corners of the lower two levels of the stair towers are proposed on the south and east sides of the building. The roof is primarily a pitched roof finished with "monier Madeira blend" shades of clay barrel tiles (there is a flat area in the center of the building on the south side of the building for mechanical equipment). The applicant has amended the proposed development to respond to Staff's concerns raised previously in the Staff Report prepared for the June 20, 2006, CDB meeting. Unit designs/layout and unit entry locations have not changed from that previously submitted, with unit entries on the south side of the building and the unit in a linear layout south to north. The western fagade is 93 feet in length (north/south). A balcony for the master bedroom for the western unit has been added. The dining room extension from the main fagade plane has been increased from 1.5 feet to four feet, further breaking up the western fagade. The eastern fagade is 121 feet in length (north/south). There is a building indentation of approximately seven feet directly north of the elevator. The two bedrooms along the eastern fagade have been enlarged by five feet to break up the eastern fagade, which is in compliance with the Beach by Design Guidelines requiring the facades of buildings greater than 100 feet to have offsets of greater than five feet. Balconies have also been added to these eastern bedrooms. The kitchen extension from the main eastern fagade plane has been increased from 1.5 feet to three feet, further breaking up the eastern fagade. Main unit balconies are on the north end of the units as an extension of the living rooms. The unit on the seventh (top) floor is still designed with a virtual blank wall on the west side. These building extensions have been accommodated in the site design by shifting the building westward. The applicant has redesigned the elevator, stairwell and electrical/storage rooms in the southeast corner of the building to provide a building entrance accessible to Mandalay Avenue, also providing lobby windows on each floor. Beach by Design Guidelines require as least 60 percent of any elevation to be covered with windows or architectural decoration. The applicant has submitted information that the revised project is in compliance with the 60 percent Guideline through the use of windows, sliding glass doors, aluminum railings, banding, balconies, rusticated (diamond scored) stucco and trim to meet this requirement. Generally, the revised building elevations represent an improvement over that previously submitted and are in conformity with Beach by Design Guidelines; however, the site and building design is not the preferred form of development in the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. The site and building design, given the context of the site being adjacent to the Sandpearl project with a high-rise and a low-rise residential towers and the ground floor retail fronting on Mandalay Avenue, does not take advantage of the view corridor toward the Gulf of Mexico created between these two Sandpearl buildings. This site is located in the "Destination Resort" District of Beach by Design. The following is excerpts from this document that specifically speaks to this site in context to its surrounding area and to Mandalay Avenue: Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 4 of 10 • • "The existing condition of the retail uses along the west side of North Mandalay have a negative impact on North Mandalay as an attractive and desirable street. The success of Pelican Walk, a bold and pioneering redevelopment effort, has been negatively impacted by the unattractiveness and economic weakness of retail uses along the west side of North Mandalay. The preferred form of redevelopment for this area is mixed use with resort residential and hospitality uses fronting on the Beach and retail, restaurant and residential uses fronting on North Mandalay." "Currently, more than half of the frontage on North Mandalay does not have an active retail facade on both sides of the street. This lack of "closure" diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street. Ideally, North Mandalay would be redeveloped as a two-sided retail street with retail uses on both sides of a street which is sufficiently pedestrian- friendly that shoppers could easily cross from one side to the other. Pedestrian friendliness requires a functional barrier between moving vehicles and pedestrians on the sidewalk in the form of parked cars, closely-spaced street trees or some other kind of physical barrier. Pedestrian friendliness also requires well-marked cross walks and, in the case of a four lane street, a safe "haven" in the median so that pedestrians can make the crossing in two stages." "North Mandalay sidewalks should be designed so that pedestrians can walk along building facades and the curbside portion of the sidewalk is dedicated to landscaping and street amenities including cafe seating and casual setting of street furniture. Property owners should provide arcades or awnings to provide cover for pedestrians during inclement weather." The proposed redesign of this project provides an alternative to the ideal to have an active retail facade on the west side of Mandalay Avenue as envisioned by Beach by Design. The request now includes reductions to the front setback along Mandalay Avenue from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain, pergolas and raised platform). The applicant has designed a plaza area as an extension of the sidewalk along Mandalay Avenue to provide areas for pedestrian activity. Benches and a planter seating area have been added for pedestrian utilization. A fountain has been added at the northeast corner of the site at the intersection of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street for visual interest. Should this request be approved by the CDB, a condition requiring the fountain to be no greater than 30-inches in height must be included, as this fountain is within a sight visibility triangle. Two pergolas have also been added for visual interest and to provide shade for pedestrians. A "Mandalay Information Center" has been added in the southeast corner of the site providing a wall where information on Beach activities can be displayed, as well as a raised platform for artist performances or displays (music or art). The application lacks details for the "Mandalay Information Center" as to what information will be displayed, who will maintain such information to keep it up to-date or the type or frequency of activities/performances, as well as information as to the long-term maintenance of this area along Mandalay Avenue. While the applicant envisions these facilities as a benefit to the public, it is unclear as to the benefit to the condominium owners. Staff is not convinced that this alternative to an active retail facade is maintainable or sustainable for the long term by the 12 condominium owners of this property. The proposal as submitted is not the preferred form of development of a mixed use with residential, Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 5 of 10 0 • restaurant and retail uses, where the development would front on, and activate the street, as envisioned by Beach by Design. Without such retail/restaurant uses fronting on Mandalay Avenue, the potential as a two-sided retail street will never be realized. Designing the site to provide the retail/restaurant component as a mixed use most likely would produce a different building design that would comply with the vision for this area and represent an improvement over a site design that was originally submitted to meet the minimum required setbacks. This different site and building design could better justify an increased building height. When Beach by Design was written, the existing circumstances were much worse than what exists today. The adjacent Sandpearl project to the south conforms to the preferred form of redevelopment addressed in the first paragraph excerpt above by providing a mixed use with retail and residential uses fronting on Mandalay Avenue. As discussed above, the building facades have been greatly improved over that originally submitted where compliance with the Beach by Design Guidelines has been achieved. While the proposed building height is consistent and compatible with surrounding approved, under construction or constructed building heights, the proposal still does not comply with the attached dwelling criteria requiring "an improved site plan or improved design and appearance" relating to the request for increased height due to the noncompliance with the preferred form of development of mixed use with the building fronting on Mandalay Avenue. The building and site layout, coupled with the lack of an active retail fagade along the Mandalay Avenue frontage, even with the applicant's alternative (plaza, fountain, seating, pergolas and the "Mandalay Information Center") does not create a design that is harmonious and suitable for this high profile location on Mandalay Avenue. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. The applicant has not indicated any freestanding signage for this site. Any future freestanding sign should meet the requirements of the Code, be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Attached Dwelling criteria (Section 2-803.B) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding code enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 6 of 10 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 12 dwelling units x DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (12 dwellings maximum IMPERVIOUS 0.69 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 LOT AREA (5,000 - 0.4 acres; 17,457 square feet x 10,000 s q. feet LOT WIDTH (50 - North (Baymont St): 100.65 feet x 100 feet East (Mandalay Ave : 180.52 feet FRONT SETBACK North: 18 feet (to building), 16 feet (to x (0 - 15 feet) pavement) and zero feet (to plaza, fountain and trash staging area) East: 15 feet (to building); zero feet (to plaza, fountain, pergolas and raised platform) REAR SETBACK N/A (corner lots have two front and x 10-20 feet two side setbacks SIDE SETBACK South: 10 feet (to pavement) X (0 -10 feet) West: 13.8 feet (to building) and 14.5 feet to sidewalk HEIGHT (35 - 100 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) X feet maximum PARKING SPACES 25 spaces x (Two spaces per unit minimum) (24 required) * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 7 of 10 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH ATTACHED DWELLING FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2- 803.B): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a X building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not X involve direct access to an arterial street. 3. Height: X* a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off- street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. 4. Setbacks: X* a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: X a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 8 of 10 0 • COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.4 acres is located within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a shopping center with retail sales and a restaurant; 3. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a high-rise residential building of 12 attached dwellings; 4. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Destination Resort" District; 5. The proposal meets or exceeds required setbacks to the south and west; 6. The proposed building height is 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof); 7. The proposed building height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The proposal includes 25 parking spaces on the ground level, which meets the minimum Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit; 9. While the building facades have been greatly improved, the proposal still does not comply with the attached dwelling criteria requiring "an improved site plan or improved design and appearance" relating to the request for increased height; 10. The building and site layout, coupled with the lack of an active retail facade along the Mandalay Avenue frontage, even with the applicant's alternative (plaza, fountain, seating, pergolas and the "Mandalay Information Center") does not create a design that is harmonious and suitable for this high profile location on Mandalay Avenue; 11. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 9 of 10 0 0 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Staff concludes that this proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 4. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on March 30, 2006. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL for the Flexible Development application to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain and trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain, pergolas and raised platform) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.13, for the site at 490 Mandalay Avenue with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.13; 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: /14'v 6C M-- ?J-& Wayn M. Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIMandalay 490 Gionis Condominiums (T) - 9.19.06 CDB - WMMandalay 490 StaffReportfor 9.19.06 CDB.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 19, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 10 of 10 • Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wellsAmyclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL • November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). r E • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %2 years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section • 0 wd ,,,,BAD w?V N? wa o >a? Rt4 a ASTER ?a AGaCIA ST o o g CAMBRIA ?p o? CLEVVLD DIENHLLE .WYIL Y ,,, ° s a "0 ? = DO BAY ESPLANADE PROJECT SITE AOdU?. PMSS ` 84Y ? sr ?D? ? m sAti ? ??M pgHT? PAPAYA ST C nnRY PASSAGE < ? 1 FS WINDWARD P E sa FIRST sT ?-0 DR nR ST' o?ffi O 7y 9 BPoQiir WATER IXl RFT{? S? BAYSIDE Opp Location Map Owner. Mary G Realty, Inc. Case: FLD2006-02009 Site: 490 Mandalay Avenue Property 0.40 Size(Acres): PIN: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 Atlas Page: 267A 0 0 ON, A / 41 t L-'l,1.1 r ' + e All r ~ • 01ir Mirk- , NV?-qZ44XA ST Aerial Map Owner: Mary G Realty, Inc. Case: FLD2006-02009 Site: 490 Mandalay Avenue Property Size(Acres): 0.40 PIN: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 Atlas Page: 267A 0 0 I i -- ? ---q I 52 51 A ? _ - 501 ' 1I ?? 1 I t ? ? -------- _- I i ? S HDR I j F I 499 yr I v 1 v, in v°'i 495' L I - 1 _J i 1 r 1 ? r 4 i - t I _ 489 1 I P Q I 485 1^ 480 - 1483 rr-? I V --- 1 I 47 r __1 1 jI ' + i 475 I I - 4 ?, j I T ` -- -i Q -1 + l I o L " ANMARCO gr S ( ^ 471 ) '`-I 7 1 7 •V ?1 v - I Q 46 466 ( ti . j 2 ------' 47 W --- k I 459 --- 1 W Q 46 i 463 4 -----, _ ? ------- W ` _ 1 1 _ 453 1 45311 ,-- 1__--- ? ± r-- L45Ji - r---- 449 1---Jt_.; i 449 I' + -I I 7 2 443 1-_ ` O ? N 1 ?1 - I I I ? 439 PAPAYA ST '' -L'?? -- -- r i! 14361 / 44'?---- I 43 Zoning Map Owner. Mary G Realty, Inc. Case: FLD2006-02009 Site: 490 Mandalay Avenue Property 0.40 Size(Acres): PIN: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 Atlas Page: 267A • • - --, I -- -?? Ret 1 Q 52 I ; sales I L 1 _ Y ? I _ . 11 ? I I 1 __I 1 1----- _ I Overnight IIo' Sol Attached ac 1 "datiehs I dwellings (u?di?r construdt?ony' BAYMONT ST 1' _ 1 499 114M pIv 1 ;;2w) 2m Ir j o ' ? ,-J -? ------- j ' I i- ff I I 495 _ 48 ?- iL 7 _ ? - 468 1 L l I 465 , Atta hed4d 11 ngs/ ! 1463 R it Ov , Ret ' ------ ' J s ac do I f (Uri a CO 4 L _?!? _ - 1 f `? 1 1 475ri ' _ 471 47 `__u -- SAN/VIAR-vl>. 1 ----- CO ST f Q _= O 471 1 7 W ?V4?66 r r1 467 Ito ' DD -----R ail 47 -- '---??_ 1 a 2----- 4 y 465 sales I 4 ' 457 46 Attached W 463 I 46 dwe lings ` , -- ' 453 1 453 ??'~-- ? '------%- r-- _.051, L I_-- , i-, 449 etai I Lam. + t f_ i __ ._ I 449 r • f ales4 8 I d?$ d _?' ' 443 a s 2 PAPAYA ST Overnight • " '? )' -',436 4 1----- i 4W T_ accommodations Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Mary G Realty, Inc. I Case: FLD2006-02009 Site: 490 Mandalay Avenue Property 0.40 Size(Acres): PIN: 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 Atlas Page: 267A View looking northwest at subject property (Sandpearl att. dwell. & hotel in background) ft a View looking southwest at subject property (Sandpearl att. dwell. in background) !+h1 ITT! ''I ' View looking northeast at Belle Harbor at northeast corner of Mandalay & Baymont St. FLD2006-02009 sr" u View looking southwest at subject property (Sandpearl att. dwell. & Mandalay Bch Club in View looking northwest at Sandpearl hotel (north of subject property - under construction) View lookii?g southeast at retail sales to the east of subject property across Mandalay Ave. 490 Mandalay Avenue Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 4:27 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail); Jan Norsoph (E-mail); Cyndi Tarapani (E-mail) Subject: Staff Report for FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Jayne (for Ed)/Jan/Cyndi - Attached is the Staff Report for FLD2006-02009 for 490 Mandalay Avenue for the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting, which starts at 1:00 pm. Wayne W[Nfl Mandalay 490 Staff Report for ... 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 2:03 PM To: 'Norsoph, Jan' Subject: RE: Gionos Staff will not be supporting the revised proposal, primarily based on the vision in Beach by Design for this area for retail buildings close to the right-of-way. The revised Staff Report has not been written at this time. -----Original Message----- From: Norsoph, ]an [mailto:jan@ehaplanners.com] Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 12:47 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gionos Good Afternoon Wayne, Have you come to any preliminary comments on the revised plan? Jan A. Norsoph, AICP Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. 3001 N. Rocky Point Drive East, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33607 Phone: 813.282.3855 Fax: 813.286.2308 This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. immediately by return e-mail or at 813-282-3855. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. sert an HTML disclaimer 9/8/2006 • t Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:23 AM To: Cyndi Tarapani (E-mail) Subject: RE: Gionis Site Plan application Cyndi - I have updated your email address in my contact list. They resubmitted on August 11, 2006. I notified Jan Norsoph and you (must have been your home email address) on August 14, 2006, that they had resubmitted. They are scheduled for the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi Tarapani [mailto:ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:00 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gionis Site Plan application Wayne-can you give me an update on the Gionis site plan application, Case No. FLD 2006-2009. When we last spoke or e-mailed, they had requested a continuance to the September 19 CDB. Is that still true and have them submitted new plans? I think you may have e-mailed me to my home appreciate it if you would revise my e-mail using at Florida Design Consultants and that very much. e-mail address. I would to this address that I am is shown below. Thanks Cyndi Tarapani Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants ctarapani@fldesign.com office: 727-849-7588 Cell: 727-234-7857 Fax: 727-848-3648 1 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Garriott, Kevin Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 3:31 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Avenue It appears that there was no case work done at the time of complaint in '04. Permit voided due to lack of activity. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:40 PM To: Garriott, Kevin Subject: FW: 490 Mandalay Avenue Kevin - Have you checked this out and made any determinations? This is still in Active status. Wayne -----Original Message---- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 5:39 PM To: Garriott, Kevin Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Avenue Status? -----Original Message----- From: Garriott, Kevin Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:53 AM To: Hall, Bob; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Avenue let me check out. -----Original Message----- From: Hall, Bob Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:17 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Garriott, Kevin Subject: RE: 490 Mandalay Avenue This would be Kevin's for response. Bob Hall Development Services Manager 562-4723 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 5:48 PM To: Hall, Bob; Garriott, Kevin Subject: 490 Mandalay Avenue Bob/Kevin - I have case number FLD2006-02009 I will be bringing before the CDB on June 20, 2006. Reviewing Permit Plan for any current code enforcement cases reveals an active case, CDC2004-02495, for "Re-model (walls, electric, plumbing) No permit NEW BUSINESS". The complaint was received on September 21, 2004, and there does not appear to be any resolution to this case. Could you please check out this case and, more than likely, change the status of this case? Thanks. Wayne Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:27 AM To: 'Norsoph, Jan' Subject: RE: Gionos Attached. -----Original Message----- From: Norsoph, Jan [mailto:jan@ehaplanners.com] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:20 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gionos Good Morning Wayne, noticed in the packet that I rec'd an e-mail (August 14) to Jerry Figurski regarding an updated staff report. Could you e-mail me the latest staff report. Thanks Jan A. Norsoph, AICP Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. 3001 N. Rocky Point Drive East, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33607 Phone: 813.282.3855 Fax: 813.286.2308 This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. immediately by return e-mail or at 813-282-3855. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. sert an HTML disclaimer 8/17/2006 • 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:49 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Ave Approval conditions for subject application: Prior to building permit, the applicant shall provide the following: 1)a copy of an approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption 2)soil borings,water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond. 3)a copy of a right-of way permit for any storm work in the Mandalay right of way. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4789 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 3:37 PM To: Gerald (Jerry) Figurski (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Jerry - I have inadvertently not sent you an updated Staff Report for the above referenced application that will be heard by the CDB tomorrow (to be continued to the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting). The updated Staff Report is attached. Wayne Mandalay 490 Staff Report for ... 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 3:38 PM To: Keith Zayac (E-mail) Subject: FW: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue FYI -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 3:37 PM To: Gerald (Jerry) Figurski (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Jerry - I have inadvertently not sent you an updated Staff Report for the above referenced application that will be heard by the CDB tomorrow (to be continued to the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting). The updated Staff Report is attached. Wayne rmwn hl Mandalay 490 Staff Report for ... ?? w 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 10:18 AM To: 'Norsoph, Jan' Cc: Cyndi Tarapani (E-mail); Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Gionos Yes, they have resubmitted. Contact Sherry Watkins if you want copies of the application material (562-4582). -----Original Message----- From: Norsoph, Jan [mailto:jan@ehaplanners.com] Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 9:14 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Gionos Good Morning Wayne, Any submittal yet? Jan A. Norsoph, AICP Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. 3001 N. Rocky Point Drive East, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33607 Phone: 813.282.3855 Fax: 813.286.2308 This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. immediately by return e-mail or at 813-282-3855. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. sert an HTML disclaimer 8/14/2006 • • Wells, Wayne From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:34 PM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittal for 9-19-06 Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the 9-19-2006 meeting: FLD2006-02011 - 146 Brightwater Drive: FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Cir: FLD2006-04024 - 1532 S Highland FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Ave FLD2006-05029 - 100 Park Place Blvd S ANX2006-07025 - 1415 Regal Rd ANX2006-06020 - 1960 E Skyline Dr ANX2006-06022 - 3060 Allen Ave ANX2006-06023 - 2727 Daniel St ANX2006-06024 - 2295 McMullen Booth ANX2006-05018 - 109 McMullen Booth ANX2006-06021 1606 Scott Street ANX2006-05015 1321 Woodbine Street Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Mike Reynolds Planner: Mike Reynolds Planner: Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments/conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, August 15, 2006. Gayle Elliott • 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:03 AM To: 'Cyndi Tarapani' Subject: RE: Gionis application Engelhart and Hammer is part of the team for JMC (check with Ed Armstrong). -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi Tarapani [mailto:ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 8:35 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Gionis application Wayne-how is Jan Norsoph involved? Do you know who he represents? Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants ctarapani@fldesign.com Office: 727-849-7588 Cell: 727-234-7857 Fax: 727-848-3648 >>> <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> 8/8/2006 5:23:36 PM >>> Cyndi - No change from email to you below. Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:47 AM To: Cyndi Tarapani (E-mail); Jan Norsoph (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Cyndi and Jan - The applicant has requested a continuance of the above referenced application from the August 15, 2006, CDB meeting to the CDB meeting on September 19, 2006. A revised application and plans have not been resubmitted at this time. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi Tarapani [mailto:ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:13 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: ed@jpfirm.com Subject: Gionis application Wayne-just checking in on the Gionis application. Is it still on the August 15 CDB or did they ask for a continuance? Have they submitted revised plans? Any update would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants ctarapani@fldesign.com Office: 727-849-7588 Cell: 727-234-7857 Fax: 727-848-3648 1 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:24 PM To: 'Cyndi Tarapani' Subject: RE: Gionis application Cyndi - No change from email to you below. Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:47 AM To: Cyndi Tarapani (E-mail); Jan Norsoph (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Cyndi and Jan - The applicant has requested a continuance of the above referenced application from the August 15, 2006, CDB meeting to the CDB meeting on September 19, 2006. A revised application and plans have not been resubmitted at this time. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi Tarapani [mailto:ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 5:13 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: ed@jpfirm.com Subject: Gionis application Wayne-just checking in on the Gionis application. Is it still on the August 15 CDB or did they ask for a continuance? Have they submitted revised plans? Any update would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants ctarapani@fldesign.com Office: 727-849-7588 Cell: 727-234-7857 Fax: 727-848-3648 1 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 10:47 AM To: Cyndi Tarapani (E-mail); Jan Norsoph (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Cyndi and Jan - The applicant has requested a continuance of the above referenced application from the August 15, 2006, CDB meeting to the CDB meeting on September 19, 2006. A revised application and plans have not been resubmitted at this time. Wayne • ?R,ciNaL CDB Meeting Date: August 15, 2006 Case Number: FLD2006-02009 Agenda Item: DI Owners/Applicants: Mary G Realty, Inc. Representative: Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA, Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Addresses: 490 Mandalay Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT UPDATE: At their meeting on June 20. 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) continued this application, at the applicant's request, to the August 15, 2006, agenda in order to address Staff concerns. The applicant has met with Staff and is preparing revised drawings. In order to allow Staff adequate time to review the revised drawings and revise the Staff Report, the applicant is requesting this case be continued to the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting (see attached letter). GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2- 803.B. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.4 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Shopping center with retail sales and restaurant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (12 condominiums) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation use (under LAND USES: construction - Sandpearl) East: Tourist District; Shopping center (retail sales and restaurants), retail sales South: Tourist District; Attached dwellings and retail sales (under construction - Sandpearl) West: Tourist District; Attached dwellings (under construction - Sandpearl) Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 1 of 9 • • CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a tourist-dominated area with retail sales and restaurants catering to tourists along Mandalay Avenue. High-rise attached dwelling complexes exist to the south (Mandalay Beach Club) and to the northeast (Belle Harbor). The Sandpearl project is under construction to the north (hotel), to the west (high-rise attached dwellings) and to the south (low-rise attached dwellings over retail sales fronting on Mandalay Avenue). The Pelican Walk shopping center exists across Mandalay Avenue, which has been approved to add a four-story parking garage with three additional floors with 28 attached dwellings where the parking lot currently exists (building permit application submitted and being reviewed). ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.4 acres is located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. The site is basically a rectangle, but with the Mandalay Avenue side being slightly longer in length. The site is currently developed with a small shopping center of 6,254 square feet of five commercial units and a restaurant. The existing building and other site improvements will be demolished. This site is located in the "Destination Resort" District of Beach by Design. Property to the north is currently being developed with the Sandpearl hotel of 253 rooms (height of 95 feet). The property to the west and south is currently being developed as part of the Sandpearl project with a high-rise residential building to the west (height of 150 feet) and a low-rise residential building to the south over ground-level retail sales floor area (approximately 8,300 square feet) directly fronting on Mandalay Avenue (height of 48.5 feet). The property at the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street has been developed with the Belle Harbor high-rise residential project (two towers of heights of 99 and 130 feet). The property to the east across Mandalay Avenue is developed with one and two story retail sales buildings and the two-story Pelican Walk shopping center. A four-story parking garage with three additional residential floors of 28 attached dwelling units (70-foot height) has been approved to replace the existing parking lot for the Pelican Walk shopping center (FLD2004-09072/TDR2005-01015, approved by the CDB on April 19, 2005). Building permits for this Pelican Walk construction have been submitted and are being reviewed. Proposal: The proposal includes the construction of a 12-unit residential building 82.5 feet tall (to mid-point of pitched roof). Two dwellings per floor with approximately 2,380 square feet of living area each are proposed on the first five residential floors. The sixth floor contains one dwelling unit of 2,384 square feet of living area and a pool and recreation area on the west side. The seventh floor contains one dwelling unit of 2,384 square feet of living area. A total of 25 parking spaces are proposed, primarily located under the building. The proposal meets or exceeds required setbacks to the east, south, west and north, with the exception the request includes a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 2 of 9 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area). The building will have a refuse collection room on the ground floor on the south side of the parking level. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer developments. An increase to building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) is included in this proposal. The Tourist District allows a height of 35 feet that may be increased to a maximum height of 100 feet, based upon meeting certain criteria. The proposed height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area (see heights of buildings under "Site Location and Existing Conditions" above). It is also noted that the Mandalay Beach Club between Papaya and San Marco Streets west of Mandalay Avenue were approved/constructed at a height of 145 feet. The proposal includes 24 parking spaces on the ground level, which meets the minimum Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit, accessed from a driveway from Baymont Street. The site today has driveways on both Baymont Street and Mandalay Avenue. The driveway on Mandalay Avenue will be removed and a sidewalk consistent with that existing on Mandalay Avenue will be constructed, along with two additional parallel on-street parking spaces. A grassed retention area is proposed on the west side of the site between the proposed building and the Sandpearl parking garage. The site will be landscaped along its perimeter with trees (Queen palms and Sabal palms), shrubs (hibiscus, india hawthorn and viburnum) and ground cover (big blue lily turf and sod). Code permits only 75 percent of the required trees to be palms. Should this request be approved, the landscape plan would need to be amended to include at least 25 percent of shade trees. The proposed building has been designed using a Mediterranean architectural theme. The ground level parking level and the first living floor utilizes a diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz. The seventh living floor also utilizes this same diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz. The exterior of living floors two through six are finished with stucco painted in alternating vertical bands of "restrained gold" and "ivoire." Insets finished with the same diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz are proposed on the facades of the stairwells on the south side of the building. Quoins to accent the corners of the lower two levels of the stair towers are proposed on the south and east sides of the building. The roof is primarily a pitched roof finished with "monier Madeira blend" shades of clay barrel tiles (there is a flat area in the center of the building on the south side of the building for mechanical equipment). Staff's concern with this project revolves around the layout of the building/units, the facades of the building and the relationship of this building to the adjacent Sandpearl project and Mandalay Avenue. The building has been designed with units on the east and west sides that stretch the almost the entire length of the building north to south. Unit entries are on the south side of the building, where residents and guests must pass down a fairly narrow hallway past all bedrooms to reach the living areas of the unit. Master bedrooms, where generally great attention and space is provided, have been relegated to less than desirable locations in the units. The eastern unit master Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 3 of 9 • • bedrooms overlook the common area outside the elevator lobbies and stairwells. The only usable balconies proposed are on the north end of the units as an extension of the living rooms. Given that the building design gives units two sides of the building, no usable balconies are provided for any bedrooms. Bedroom #2 on the eastern units has been provided a balcony to provide visual interest to the building along Mandalay Avenue. While there are building projections for Bedroom #2 and the kitchen for the eastern unit (facing Mandalay Avenue) and the dining room for the western unit (facing Sandpearl high-rise building), these projections are only 18-inches, providing insufficient building undulation producing basically a flat facade along the longest building dimension. The unit on the seventh (top) floor is a virtual blank wall on the west side. Given the context of the site being adjacent to the Sandpearl residential project with a high-rise and a low-rise tower, this project does not take advantage of the view corridor toward the Gulf of Mexico created between these two Sandpearl buildings. The proposed building does not have a presence or focal point on Mandalay Avenue, as the building is setback from this property line 15 feet. The proposal does not comply with the attached dwelling criteria requiring "an improved site plan or improved design and appearance" relating to the request for increased height. In summary, the building and unit layout, the design of the facade of the building, the proposed setback to Mandalay Avenue and the building's relationship to the adjacent Sandpearl project creates a design that is inharmonious and unsuitable for this high profile location on Mandalay Avenue. This site is located in the "Destination Resort" District of Beach by Design. The following is excerpts from this document that specifically speaks to this site in context to its surrounding area and to Mandalay Avenue: "The existing condition of the retail uses along the west side of North Mandalay have a negative impact on North Mandalay as an attractive and desirable street. The success of Pelican Walk, a bold and pioneering redevelopment effort, has been negatively impacted by the unattractiveness and economic weakness of retail uses along the west side of North Mandalay. The preferred form of redevelopment for this area is mixed use with resort residential and hospitality uses fronting on the Beach and retail, restaurant and residential uses fronting on North Mandalay." "Currently, more than half of the frontage on North Mandalay does not have an active retail facade on both sides of the street. This lack of "closure" diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street. Ideally, North Mandalay would be redeveloped as a two-sided retail street with retail uses on both sides of a street which is sufficiently pedestrian- friendly that shoppers could easily cross from one side to the other. Pedestrian friendliness requires a functional barrier between moving vehicles and pedestrians on the sidewalk in the form of parked cars, closely-spaced street trees or some other kind of physical barrier. Pedestrian friendliness also requires well-marked cross walks and, in the case of a four lane street, a safe "haven" in the median so that pedestrians can make the crossing in two stages." "North Mandalay sidewalks should be designed so that pedestrians can walk along building facades and the curbside portion of the sidewalk is dedicated to landscaping and street amenities including caf6 seating and casual setting of street furniture. Property owners Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 4 of 9 • should provide arcades or awnings to provide cover for pedestrians during inclement weather." When Beach by Design was written, the existing circumstances were much worse than what exists today. The adjacent Sandpearl project to the south conforms to the preferred form of redevelopment addressed in the first paragraph excerpt above by providing a mixed use with retail and residential uses fronting on Mandalay Avenue. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. The applicant has not indicated any freestanding signage for this site. Any future freestanding sign should meet the requirements of the Code, be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Attached Dwelling criteria (Section 2-803.B) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding code enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 5 of 9 0 • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 12 dwelling units x DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (12 dwellings maximum IMPERVIOUS 0.56 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 LOT AREA (5,000 - 0.4 acres; 17,457 square feet x 10,000 s q. feet LOT WIDTH (50 - North (Baymont St): 100.65 feet x 100 feet East (Mandalay Ave : 180.52 feet FRONT SETBACK North: 18.5 feet (to building), 15.3 X (0 - 15 feet) feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to trash staging area) East: 15 feet (to building and pavement) REAR SETBACK N/A (corner lots have two front and X 10-20 feet two side setbacks) SIDE SETBACK South: 10 feet (to pavement) X (0 -10 feet) West: 20 feet (to building) and 18.4 feet to sidewalk) HEIGHT (35 -100 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) X feet maximum PARKING SPACES 25 spaces x (Two spaces per unit minimum) (24 required) * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 6 of 9 • • COMPLIANCE WITH ATTACHED DWELLING FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2- 803.B): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a X building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not X involve direct access to an arterial street. 3. Height: X* a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off- street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. 4. Setbacks: X a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: X a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 7 of 9 • CnA4PI.IANCV WITH C-RNVRAI. CTANDARTIC (Cectinn 3-9131- Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X* including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.4 acres is located within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a shopping center with retail sales and a restaurant; 3. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a high-rise residential building of 12 attached dwellings; 4. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Destination Resort" District; 5. The proposal meets or exceeds required setbacks to the east, south, west and north, with the exception the request includes a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area); 6. The proposed building height is 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof); 7. The proposed building height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The proposal includes 24 parking spaces on the ground level, which meets the minimum Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit; 9. The building and unit layout, the design of the facade of the building, the proposed setback to Mandalay Avenue and the building's relationship to the adjacent Sandpearl project creates a design that is inharmonious and unsuitable for this high profile location on Mandalay Avenue; 10. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 8 of 9 0 0 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Staff concludes that this proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 4. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on March 30, 2006. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL for the Flexible Development application to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for the site at 490 Mandalay Avenue with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B; 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff 44. tit.- / t - I'd& Wayne 4. Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S::Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIMandalay 490 Gionis Condominiums (T) - 8.15.06 CDB - WWIMandalay 490 Staff Report for 8.15.06 CDB.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 15, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 9 of 9 Jul 25 2006 12:52PM HPLRSERJET 3330 p.2 0 0 1 GERALD A. FIGURSKI, P.A. J. BEN HARRILL, P.A. DEBRA M. ZAMPETTI July 19, 2006 FIGURSKI & HARRILL A=ORNEYS AT LAW THE OAKS AT PERRINE RANCH 2550 PERMIT PLACE NEW PORT RICHEY, FLORIDA 34655 www,fhlaw.net Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 RE: Mary G. Realty, Inc. FLD2006-020099 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Delk: This firm represents Mary G. Realty, Inc. As indicated to you pubhcl3 Community Development Board meeting on June 20, 2006, there was a po; we would need to seek a further continuance. -After meeting with staff aj the. agreement of staff, we would request a continuance from the August I Community Development Board meeting to September 19, 2006. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to c4 Thank you for your assistance in this matter. ONE: (727) 942-0733 FAX: (727) 044-3711 at the id with , 2006, me. Enclosure cc: Mary G. Realty; Inc. Keith Zayac, PE Clem Pappas Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wells(a,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL • November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). 0 0 • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 %2 years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Cyndi Tarapani [ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 1:18 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: ed@jpfirm.com; JayneS@jpfirm.com Subject: RE: Gionis Application Wayne-thanks so much for the update. You are correct in that I am not evaluating this application for my general health!! Our firm represents JMC Communities who are opposed to several aspects of the project. Again, I appreciate the status report. If they do resubmit, could you let me know? I will also check back with you in several weeks to see if there is anything new on the project. Thanks again for your help. Cyndi Tarapani Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants ctarapani@fldesign.com Office: 727-849-7588 Cell: 727-234-7857 Fax: 727-848-3648 >>> <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> 7/25/2006 1:09:00 PM >>> Cyndi - This case was continued to the August 15, 2006, CDB meeting. After discussion with the applicant regarding revisions to their application and the time frames to review and revise the Staff Report, as well as dealing with the internal Staff schedule for CDB items, it was discussed that the applicant will request a continuance to the September 19, 2006, CDB meeting. The applicant has not formally resubmitted their proposal for the property at this time, nor the request to be continued to the September 19th CDB meeting. You are enquiring of this case apparently due to consultation on this case of some nature. May I assume you are not working for the applicant in this case and can you elaborate? Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi Tarapani [mailto:ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: ed@jpfirm.com; JayneS@jpfirm.com Subject: Gionis Application Wayne- I have a copy of the staff report regarding the Gionis site on Clearwater Beach-City case FLD 2006-02009. The site location is 490 Mandalay Avenue. I understand that this case was originally scheduled for the June 20 CDB but that the applicant requested and received a continuance until August 15. Can you please let me know if the applicant has submitted revised plans to address any of the staff concerns? Also, if there is any new information regarding the review on August 15 or if the date has changed, can you please let me know that as well? Thanks in advance for your help. Cyndi Tarapani 1 Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants ctarapani@fldesign.com Office: 727-849-7588 Cell: 727-234-7857 Fax: 727-848-3648 0 9 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 11:19 AM To: Castelli, Joelle Wiley Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil Subject: St. Petersburg Times Reporter Joelle - Today I spoke to DeMorris Lee with the St. Petersburg Times regarding two items where I am the case planner on tomorrow's Community Development Board (CDB) agenda: 1. FLD2005-09093 - 279 Windward Passage - I told him this case was being requested to again continue the public hearing to the July 18th CDB meeting. This case has legal issues related to City ownership of the submerged land where the docks are proposed and the reverter clause in the deed from the State. 2. FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue - I told him this case was being requested to continue the public hearing to the August 15th CDB meeting in order to continue working with Staff for an acceptable project. This case is not supported by Staff for architectural and building location reasons. Wayne • . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Nick Fri [natbeach@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 10:52 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Thanks for calling Let me do this via email, so you don't have to come in Sunday as I will likely not be home. I could give you my cell. Calling me Monday is fine, I'm home all day which is rare. Mandalay ?'s Your analysis of the floor plan is on target and will improve even the saleability. But, do I understand correctly, we prefer the bldg. move into the front setback to "engage" the street? Jeffords ?s If the purpose of the code is to improve the "design" and liveability of CW, and the code seeks to "drive" non- compliance towards or into comp. Why are we seeking to extend a NC property? Further, why would we restrict rebuilding (6-103E) , as separate DUs; when normally attached is our preference? Thanks, Nick 6/19/2006 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 5:36 PM To: E. D. Armstrong Esquire (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Ed - A request to continue the public hearing for the above referenced case has been submitted for the June 20, 2006, CDB meeting. They are asking for a continuance to the August 15, 2006, CDB meeting. Wayne • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 4:11 PM To: 'yby@ehaplanners.com' Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Attached are the maps you requested. Wayne ;>) Aerial Map.doc Existing Location Map.doc Zoning Map.doc rrounding Uses Map i CDB Meeting Date: June 20, 2006 10 ' C R 11 G? 1, N A L .- Case Number: FLD2006-02009 Agenda Item: E3 Owners/Applicants: Mary G Realty, Inc. Representative: Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA, Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Addresses: 490 Mandalay Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2- 803.B. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District; Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 0.4 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Shopping center with retail sales and restaurant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (12 condominiums) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Overnight accommodation use (under LAND USES: construction - Sandpearl) East: Tourist District; Shopping center (retail sales and restaurants), retail sales South: Tourist District; Attached dwellings and retail sales (under construction - Sandpearl) West: Tourist District; Attached dwellings (under construction - Sandpearl) CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a tourist-dominated area with retail sales and restaurants catering to tourists along Mandalay Avenue. High-rise attached dwelling complexes exist to the south (Mandalay Beach Club) and to the northeast (Belle Harbor). The Sandpearl project is under construction to the north (hotel), to the west (high-rise Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 20, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 1 of 8 • • attached dwellings) and to the south (low-rise attached dwellings over retail sales fronting on Mandalay Avenue). The Pelican Walk shopping center exists across Mandalay Avenue, which has been approved to add a four-story parking garage with three additional floors with 28 attached dwellings where the parking lot currently exists (building permit application submitted and being reviewed). ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.4 acres is located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. The site is basically a rectangle, but with the Mandalay Avenue side being slightly longer in length. The site is currently developed with a small shopping center of 6,254 square feet of five commercial units and a restaurant. The existing building and other site improvements will be demolished. This site is located in the "Destination Resort" District of Beach by Design. Property to the north is currently being developed with the Sandpearl hotel of 253 rooms (height of 95 feet). The property to the west and south is currently being developed as part of the Sandpearl project with a high-rise residential building to the west (height of 150 feet) and a low-rise residential building to the south over ground-level retail sales floor area (approximately 8,300 square feet) directly fronting on Mandalay Avenue (height of 48.5 feet). The property at the northeast corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street has been developed with the Belle Harbor high-rise residential project (two towers of heights of 99 and 130 feet). The property to the east across Mandalay Avenue is developed with one and two story retail sales buildings and the two-story Pelican Walk shopping center. A four-story parking garage with three additional residential floors of 28 attached dwelling units (70-foot height) has been approved to replace the existing parking lot for the Pelican Walk shopping center (FLD2004-09072/TDR2005-01015, approved by the CDB on April 19, 2005). Building permits for this Pelican Walk construction have been submitted and are being reviewed. Proposal: The proposal includes the construction of a 12-unit residential building 82.5 feet tall (to mid-point of pitched roof). Two dwellings per floor with approximately 2,380 square feet of living area each are proposed on the first five residential floors. The sixth floor contains one dwelling unit of 2,384 square feet of living area and a pool and recreation area on the west side. The seventh floor contains one dwelling unit of 2,384 square feet of living area. A total of 25 parking spaces are proposed, primarily located under the building. The proposal meets or exceeds required setbacks to the east, south, west and north, with the exception the request includes a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area). The building will have a refuse collection room on the ground floor on the south side of the parking level. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer developments. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 20, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 2 of 8 0 0 An increase to building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) is included in this proposal. The Tourist District allows a height of 35 feet that may be increased to a maximum height of 100 feet, based upon meeting certain criteria. The proposed height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area (see heights of buildings under "Site Location and Existing Conditions" above). It is also noted that the Mandalay Beach Club between Papaya and San Marco Streets west of Mandalay Avenue were approved/constructed at a height of 145 feet. The proposal includes 24 parking spaces on the ground level, which meets the minimum Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit, accessed from a driveway from Baymont Street. The site today has driveways on both Baymont Street and Mandalay Avenue. The driveway on Mandalay Avenue will be removed and a sidewalk consistent with that existing on Mandalay Avenue will be constructed, along with two additional parallel on-street parking spaces. A grassed retention area is proposed on the west side of the site between the proposed building and the Sandpearl parking garage. The site will be landscaped along its perimeter with trees (Queen palms and Sabal palms), shrubs (hibiscus, india hawthorn and viburnum) and ground cover (big blue lily turf and sod). Code permits only 75 percent of the required trees to be palms. Should this request be approved, the landscape plan would need to be amended to include at least 25 percent of shade trees. The proposed building has been designed using a Mediterranean architectural theme. The ground level parking level and the first living floor utilizes a diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz. The seventh living floor also utilizes this same diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz. The exterior of living floors two through six are finished with stucco painted in alternating vertical bands of "restrained gold" and "ivoire." Insets finished with the same diamond-scored stucco painted smokey topaz are proposed on the facades of the stairwells on the south side of the building. Quoins to accent the corners of the lower two levels of the stair towers are proposed on the south and east sides of the building. The roof is primarily a pitched roof finished with "monier Madeira blend" shades of clay barrel tiles (there is a flat area in the center of the building on the south side of the building for mechanical equipment). Staff's concern with this project revolves around the layout of the building/units, the facades of the building and the relationship of this building to the adjacent Sandpearl project and Mandalay Avenue. The building has been designed with units on the east and west sides that stretch the almost the entire length of the building north to south. Unit entries are on the south side of the building, where residents and guests must pass down a fairly narrow hallway past all bedrooms to reach the living areas of the unit. Master bedrooms, where generally great attention and space is provided, have been relegated to less than desirable locations in the units. The eastern unit master bedrooms overlook the common area outside the elevator lobbies and stairwells. The only usable balconies proposed are on the north end of the units as an extension of the living rooms. Given that the building design gives units two sides of the building, no usable balconies are provided for any bedrooms. Bedroom #2 on the eastern units has been provided a balcony to provide visual interest to the building along Mandalay Avenue. While there are building projections for Bedroom #2 and the kitchen for the eastern unit (facing Mandalay Avenue) and the dining room for the western unit Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 20, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 3 of 8 (facing Sandpearl high-rise building), these projections are only 18-inches, providing insufficient building undulation producing basically a flat facade along the longest building dimension. The unit on the seventh (top) floor is a virtual blank wall on the west side. Given the context of the site being adjacent to the Sandpearl residential project with a high-rise and a low-rise tower, this project does not take advantage of the view corridor toward the Gulf of Mexico created between these two Sandpearl buildings. The proposed building does not have a presence or focal point on Mandalay Avenue, as the building is setback from this property line 15 feet. The proposal does not comply with the attached dwelling criteria requiring "an improved site plan or improved design and appearance" relating to the request for increased height. In summary, the building and unit layout, the design of the facade of the building, the proposed setback to Mandalay Avenue and the building's relationship to the adjacent Sandpearl project creates a design that is inharmonious and unsuitable for this high profile location on Mandalay Avenue. This site is located in the "Destination Resort" District of Beach by Design. The following is excerpts from this document that specifically speaks to this site in context to its surrounding area and to Mandalay Avenue: "The existing condition of the retail uses along the west side of North Mandalay have a negative impact on North Mandalay as an attractive and desirable street. The success of Pelican Walk, a bold and pioneering redevelopment effort, has been negatively impacted by the unattractiveness and economic weakness of retail uses along the west side of North Mandalay. The preferred form of redevelopment for this area is mixed use with resort residential and hospitality uses fronting on the Beach and retail, restaurant and residential uses fronting on North Mandalay." "Currently, more than half of the frontage on North Mandalay does not have an active retail facade on both sides of the street. This lack of "closure" diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street. Ideally, North Mandalay would be redeveloped as a two-sided retail street with retail uses on both sides of a street which is sufficiently pedestrian- friendly that shoppers could easily cross from one side to the other. Pedestrian friendliness requires a functional barrier between moving vehicles and pedestrians on the sidewalk in the form of parked cars, closely-spaced street trees or some other kind of physical barrier. Pedestrian friendliness also requires well-marked cross walks and, in the case of a four lane street, a safe "haven" in the median so that pedestrians can make the crossing in two stages." "North Mandalay sidewalks should be designed so that pedestrians can walk along building facades and the curbside portion of the sidewalk is dedicated to landscaping and street amenities including cafe seating and casual setting of street furniture. Property owners should provide arcades or awnings to provide cover for pedestrians during inclement weather." When Beach by Design was written, the existing circumstances were much worse than what exists today. The adjacent Sandpearl project to the south conforms to the preferred form of redevelopment addressed in the first paragraph excerpt above by providing a mixed use with retail Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 20, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 4 of 8 • • and residential uses fronting on Mandalay Avenue. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. The applicant has not indicated any freestanding signage for this site. Any future freestanding sign should meet the requirements of the Code, be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Attached Dwelling criteria (Section 2-803.B) have not been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding code enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 12 dwelling units X DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (12 dwellings maximum IMPERVIOUS 0.56 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) 0.95 LOT AREA (5,000 - 0.4 acres; 17,457 square feet X 10,000 s q. feet) LOT WIDTH (50 - North (Baymont St): 100.65 feet X 100 feet East (Mandalay Ave : 180.52 feet FRONT SETBACK North: 18.5 feet (to building), 15.3 X (0 - 15 feet) feet (to pavement) and zero feet (to trash staging area) East: 15 feet (to building and pavement) REAR SETBACK N/A (corner lots have two front and X 10-20 feet two side setbacks) SIDE SETBACK South: 10 feet (to pavement) X (0 -10 feet) West: 20 feet (to building) and 18.4 feet (to sidewalk) HEIGHT (35 - 100 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof) X feet maximum) . PARKING SPACES 25 spaces X (Two spaces per unit minimum) (24 required) * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 20, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 5 of 8 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH ATTACHED DWELLING FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2- 803.B): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a X building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not X involve direct access to an arterial street. 3. Height: X* a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off- street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. 4. Setbacks: X a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: X a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 20, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 6 of 8 E • COMPI.IANCR WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X* including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 0.4 acres is located within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a shopping center with retail sales and a restaurant; 3. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a high-rise residential building of 12 attached dwellings; 4. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Destination Resort" District; 5. The proposal meets or exceeds required setbacks to the east, south, west and north, with the exception the request includes a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area); 6. The proposed building height is 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof); 7. The proposed building height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The proposal includes 24 parking spaces on the ground level, which meets the minimum Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit; 9. The building and unit layout, the design of the facade of the building, the proposed setback to Mandalay Avenue and the building's relationship to the adjacent Sandpearl project creates a design that is inharmonious and unsuitable for this high profile location on Mandalay Avenue; 10. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 11. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 20, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 7 of 8 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Staff concludes that this proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 4. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends denial of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on March 30, 2006. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL for the Flexible Development application to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.B, for the site at 490 Mandalay Avenue with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Denial: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.13; 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; and 3. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: " rp- /-I. k_/& Wayne M /Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIMandalay 490 Gionis Condominiums (T) - 6.20.06 CDB - WWIMandalay 490 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 20, 2006 Case FLD2006-02009 - Page 8 of 8 • Resume Wayne M. Wells, AICP 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4504 wayne.wells(a?myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater, FL • November 2001 to Present As part of the Development Review Division, prepared and presented staff reports for Flexible Standard Development (staff-level cases), Flexible Development (public hearing cases) and Plats before the Development Review Committee and the Community Development Board and Development Agreements before the City Council; reviewed building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, email, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Zoning Coordinator Zoning Division, City of Pinellas Park, FL March 1989 to November 2001 Acting Zoning Director, Represented the Zoning Division on cases and issues before the City Council, Community Redevelopment Agency, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment and outside agencies; Prepared and presented staff reports for land use plan amendments, rezoned, planned unit developments, conditional uses, variances and site plans; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code conformance; prepared and/or assisted preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). • Program Manager, Zoning Branch Manatee County Department of Planning and Development June 1984 to March 1989 Bradenton, FL Trained and supervised three employees; Prepared and presented variances and appeals to the Board of Zoning Appeals; Coordinated final site plan and building permit review for Code conformance; Assisted in preparation of Code amendments; Provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Interim Code Enforcement Manager- Managed the Code Enforcement Section; supervised six employees; prosecuted cases before the Code Enforcement Board; investigated and prepared cases of alleged violations of land use and building codes. Planner II, Current Planning Section - Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones, planned developments, special permits, plats and mobile home parks to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed final site plans and building permits for Code enforcement; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). 0 0 • Planner I Alachua County Department of Planning and Development June 1980 to June 1984 Gainesville, FL Prepared and presented staff reports for rezones and special permits to Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners; reviewed site plans and plats for Code conformance; assisted in preparation of Code amendments; provided public information (via telephone, mail, zoning counter or predevelopment meetings). Intern - Compiled and coordinated the Alachua County Information and Data Book; drafted ordinance revisions; general research. • Graduate Assistant University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning 1979 to 1981 Gainesville, FL Coordinated downtown study for Mayo, FL; coordinated graphics for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. • Planning Technician Planning Division, City of St. Petersburg, FL 1977 to 1979 Prepared primarily graphics, for both publication and presentation; Division photographer for 1 years; worked on historic survey and report. EDUCATION Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning (Degree not conferred; course work completed, thesis not completed), University of Florida, 1981 Bachelor of Design in Architecture, University of Florida, 1976 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Institute of Certified Planners American Planning Association, Suncoast Section 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 1:27 PM To: E. D. Armstrong Esquire (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-02009, 490 Mandalay Avenue Ed - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case for the June 20, 2006, CDB meeting (1:00 pm at City Hall). Wayne r __;Non Mandalay 490 Staff Report.doc ' n ?. '. a z ii Parks & Recs Condition • 0 Conditions Associated With FLD2006-02009 490 MANDALAY AVE Debbie Reid 03/13/2006 5/16/06 - WW Not Met Include as a condition in the Staff Report. 3/13/06 - DSR Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 562-4818 727-562-4504 03/17/2006 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 03/17/2006 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 03/17/2006 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 03/17/2006 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 03/17/2006 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 03/17/2006 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 03/17/2006 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 03/17/2006 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. 03/17/2006 Portions of the building, especially on the east (which will be viewed by the traveling public) and Not Met west sides, that are rather bland. West wall of units on Living Levels 6 and 7 are vertual blank walls. Improvement is necessary to the facade, through vertical or horizontal banding, variation in building colors, increased fenestration, balconies, building ornamentation, etc. (or combinations of these or others). This relates to the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings for "Height" whereby "the increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance." 03/22/2006 Has there been any consideration given to the building locations for the two residential towers to Not Met the west and south for the Sandpearl project (public information available at the Building Department) and the layout of the units in those adjacent towers in relation to the building and unit layout for this proposal? The current proposal has an almost linear unit layout on a north/south basis where the front doors are essentially at the rear of the units and guests must pass by bedrooms (private areas) through a long hallway before they reach the living area (public areas) of the units. Has a different unit configuration been considered where units would be a north and south unit, more squarish in size, with a central elevator and stairs (2) that could have a focal point CaseConditons Print Date: 06/05/2006 Page 1 of 2 • FLD2006-02009 490 MANDALAY AVE 0 Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 of orientation to Mandalay Avenue? The top two units could still be stacked in a manner similar to the current proposal, but depending on the better location of the pool on the north side versus the south side of the building (sun angles). Balconies for the units could then be on three sides of the units, potentially producing a facade that isn't so blank facing Mandalay Avenue. Additionally, considering the developed and developing character along Mandalay Avenue south of Baymont Street where buildings are at a (or close to a) zero front setback, Staff would prefer that the building be located closer to the Mandalay Avenue property line (yes, a front setback reduction would be necessary). CaseConditons Print Date: 06/05/2006 Page 2 of 2 Message 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 10:19 AM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Gionis Property Jayne - The case file is FLD2006-02009 for 490 Mandalay Avenue. Get with Sherry for a copy. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 10:12 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Jionis Property Ed has asked me to obtain a copy of the flexible dev. app. including all plans, etc. for the "Jionis" case (near Sandpearl). I'm sorry I don't have the property address or correct name. Wayne, please give me the case number and other info. and then I will coordinate with Sherry to pay for a copy. Thank you. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 5/18/2006 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:11 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: FYI. I met with Ed today. He looked at the plans for this project that were resubmitted. -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 5:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FYI. Received call from Ed A. re development next to Sand Pearl. Let's get Gina and take a look at the details. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727-562-4561 myclearwater.com Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:53 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry; Doherty, Steve Subject: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Wayne, One Engineering issues needs further attention: 5. Show existing and proposed parallel parking spaces along Mandalay in the vicinity of the location where the driveway is to be removed. 5/12/06 - NOT MET - ADDITIONAL PARALLEL SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THIS AREA AS POSSIBLE. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com • E Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:13 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB FYI Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins @myclearwater. com -----Original Message----- From: Keller, James Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 10:12 AM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:14 PM To: DRC Members Subject: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB Importance: High DRC Members Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the June 20, 2006 CDB meeting: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue Planner - Wayne Wells [Keller, James] Not Met FLD2005-09103 -121 N Osceola Avenue Planner - Robert Tefft [Keller, James] Met FLD2006-03014 - 913 Jeffords Street Planner - Wayne Wells [Keller, James] Met LUZ2006-03001 -100 Park Place Blvd S Planner - Mike Reynolds [Keller, James] Met FLD2006-03015 - 657 Bay Esplanade - Planner -Robert Tefft [Keller, James] Met FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street - Planner - Robert Tefft [Keller, James] Met ANX2006-03011 -1416 Regal Road - Planner- Cky Ready [Keller, James] Met I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments/conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, May 16,2006. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry. watkins @nr yclearwater. corn 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:33 PM To: Planning Subject: FW: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB Importance: High FYI Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sh erry. wa tkin s @ myc lea rwa ter. cony -----Original Message----- From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 12:38 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB Sherry, FLD2006-02009 and FLD2006-03015 still owe P&R fees. For some reason on ANX2006-03011 we did not have any comments in Tidemark, so I did add them (we have no issues on that case). The remaining projects we have no issues on. Thanks!! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:14 PM To: DRC Members Subject: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB Importance: High DRC Members Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the June 20, 2006 CDB meeting: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue Planner - Wayne Wells FLD2005-09103 -121 N Osceola Avenue Planner - Robert Tefft FLD2006-03014 - 913 Jeffords Street Planner - Wayne Wells LUZ2006-03001 -100 Park Place Blvd S Planner - Mike Reynolds FLD2006-03015 - 657 Bay Esplanade - Planner -Robert Tefft FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street - Planner - Robert Tefft ANX2006-03011 -1416 Regal Road - Planner- Cky Ready I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members Please review your comments/conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, May 16,2006. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins ?J • Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 11:15 AM To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members Subject: RE: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB 490 Mandalay-No Issues. 121 Osceola-No Issues. 913 Jeffords-Not Met, should be added to D.O. as a condition. 100 Park Place-No Issues. 657 Bay Esplanade-No Issues. 1401 Court-Conditions updated, one should be added to D.O. as a condition. 1416 Regal-No Issues. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:14 PM To: DRC Members Subject: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB Importance: High DRC Members Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the June 20, 2006 CDB meeting: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue Planner - Wayne Wells FLD2005-09103 -121 N Osceola Avenue Planner - Robert Tefft FLD2006-03014 - 913 Jeffords Street Planner - Wayne Wells LUZ2006-03001 -100 Park Place Blvd S Planner - Mike Reynolds FLD2006-03015 - 657 Bay Esplanade - Planner -Robert Tefft FLD2005-11114 -1401 Court Street - Planner - Robert Tefft ANX2006-03011 -1416 Regal Road - Planner- Cky Ready I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments/conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, May 16,2006. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins@mycleanvater.com 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:14 PM To: DRC Members Subject: RESUBMITTALS FOR JUNE 20, 2006 CDB Importance: High DRC Members Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the June 20, 2006 CDB meeting: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Avenue Planner - Wayne Wells FLD2005-09103 -121 N Osceola Avenue Planner - Robert Tefft FLD2006-03014 - 913 Jeffords Street Planner - Wayne Wells LUZ2006-03001 -100 Park Place Blvd S Planner - Mike Reynolds FLD2006-03015 - 657 Bay Esplanade - Planner -Robert Tefft FLD2005-11114 - 1401 Court Street - Planner - Robert Tefft ANX2006-03011 -1416 Regal Road - Planner- Cky Ready I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments/conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, May 16,2006. Thank you, Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 sherry.watkins @mycleanuater. com Falyzooc- nL o 09 ? ?qo NIA, a.l..._ ? 258 ? ? ° r0 s e 7 CIT OF CI,EARWATER wit N -- e reaa2m_.- AND VICI ITY ``+I? ?4 P COUNTY, FLORIDA P w CLEARWATER fob BEACH PRE ARED I ?_:. PUBLIC WORKS NE ERINCNISTRATION e9a L R UB am 9 100 S Nytle Ave., Clevrrater, FL 33755 19_ j? m Ph, (727)¢52-475o, roc (727)526-4'755 ?• ? ? 1 ?; mlp//www.drolwoler-scam/C1ry?ropnmenb/puenc_woaa/engineer/ 'OAL O 7 r00 f2b BELLE HARBO =16 (ilwaimer: B SAYMONT 9 Pabdc InrormoNon able Is furnished by m. City of C-1wo141 Public Work. Admlu9trotho-A l""""it and ,11 11 accepted $ ee .? as eg STREET W- 2 0 $ and ...d by the recipient With 'be'undeegtbng 'hot the data received was collected for the p pose. or devNOplnq o ,r,phl, / u CORAL Inf...trvclure Inventory. As h the City o, Cieerwoler PWA/E m kes no waronlles -lad er Im 119d c.rcernin the . y - . ° I 5 22 rt , s a Opt 1 ea MOTEL CONDO p g a , .p • actslraeY• ebmpleleness, rN1obIIIIY• or liability .(this data for any elver parllcular use Ndherm9re, the City of Clearw,I,r I n . I 'b I,3? 5 ? S 1 l,y 42-1:14 PWAi ossumes no RoDAlty whol.oever bssodated with the use 1 ml... of such dole. 2 ?2 jOT . 4 N < A.-; ? $f1N a < .155 • 11AR9QR CON O This Ail.. Page 1. subject to periodic changes. Nf il PWA/E r F ll t bl t l b u Sr ! v .? n D or ormo on a ou es res p ebe so o visit our Web rb site lyP u ? ' f . L !AN MARCp 4 n I .. TI n ? re n ' a 9 'm as s > e ANDALAY l5 eo es 4 CH I« 22 ; p g C m NI 2t . °Ie/ di 0 100 200 400 Soo ? ? t : 122- le I l/9 ;; . ? D - v we r SCALE: t" -= 400' a,. I be I n x I x 12 I d a9 $ l4-1 PAPAYA A STRECT $ LEGEND: 2091_,0 9: .,, s ., Id/ Z. l5a I a z/ glee on 21 P ' b Its 2 © BLOCK NUMBER 4 l • fV f-- j lee ?o te'e' lib+' ? 0) 1234 LOT ADDRESS t T > 1 '? _ 1 I ?, ????- CITY LIMITS LINE • e2n_m2e 02 ue 2r as, SHADED AREA -PROPERTY \ .. 3 • >, lde to u . °d;.. ' '?'?? OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS J fj? r11 Id/ x 2a 23101 10 z - 21 / 1pl 401 tb _ u lp ros .1 ? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX 1 24 ,, Inet1 ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY O Us .>D . 5' " xlp ..? I. Si MDR ZONING DESIGNATION a a 2545-02e 22 laopta ,4 5954-fam 1 Au ' ? x $ t` nit L91 z ZONE LINE w v - A 799 !a0." 199-b!( I y? a a i I 13E4z 3vTi 1 -'t„9 f-si re pM fe ; S P. 60 1 - - a unh2 a, nw no -_- 927-,157 \00 9 m06A4 arrttatwc (1925) _ ` 8 i ? c>vsgw?Y etw s? ? s r it 10 y ,3 +2 9 9oPC9•• ppp p C I l Y P M M C O ?- 8 REZONE OPa ^ g v ? 4 ' ? sots-;arsYm ? P 1 WAT ER LOT 1 - C UMBIA tERB? 0.5. 132 -109 59 --Vat. PARK Chonnel Eallk REVISED; S B. 23-60 4z1s 1PS al sr.- A 1028 o2e-s2 0 09/09/2002 7 ? , g CuViAl BLVD -551 A , rim - a- ,412 32/0 ZONING ATLAS 2 32/02 NW 1 /4 OF SECTION . ? 276A 2 6 7 A 2768 e 8 - 29 S - 1s E OL C s O O rV 0 N M C 3 II N m 0 O M 10 i c i V) • 11:20 am Case Number: FLD2006-020•- 490 MANDALAY AVE Owner(s): Mary G Realty Inc Wa aft 490 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email R-1c Representative: Keith Zayac 701. Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, F134695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: 0.4 acres located at the southwest comer of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 86 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.B. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff. Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard Applicant: Jerry Figurski, Richard Marcel The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , 1. Replace sidewalk detail (Sheet 3 of 6) with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109. 2. Relocate concrete driveway note on plan to driveway on north side of site. 3. Accessing the sanitary manhole as proposed will require extensive resurfacing and restoration of asphalt and brick pavers. Applicant shall instead install doghouse manhole in the Baymont Street right-of-way to reduce traffic impact and restoration cost. 4. Sheet #6 will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. 5. Show existing and proposed parallel parking spaces along Mandalay in the vicinity of the location where the driveway is to be removed. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Use sewer lateral and cleanout Detail #305. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 14 1 . Provide Fire Flow alculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECON ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. Show proposed location PRIOR TO CDB. 3. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB 4. This building is a high-rise building as measured from the street level which is the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access/setup point. As such you must meet the requirements for highrise buildings, per NFPA 101 to include fire control room, generator, pressurized stairways, voice evacuation fire alarm system, smoke protected elevator lobbies. (This list is not all inclusive) Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 5 . Both stairways must exit directly outside building The SW stair is exiting into garage area. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 6. The travel distance within the living units exceeds the 125' limit as required by NFPA 101,30.2.6.2. Modify to show the change PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: J 1 . No issues. Legal: J 1 . No issues. Land Resources: J 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: >(1 , Sheet 5/6 - Indicate in the Plant List what landscape material is being placed in the "blank" areas (sod?). Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant needs to provide the following: 1)a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption 2)soil borings,water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond. 3)a right-of way permit shall be required for any storm work in the Mandalay right of way. Solid Waste: 11 . No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 15 1 . Revise civil plans and building elevations to comply with the following flexible development criteria for attached dwellings: "Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level." 2. The indentation of the building north of the elevator should be dashed in as "building line above," much like the rest of the building has been depicted. 3. Provide the project value. 4. Sheet 3/6 - Complete General Note #15. 5 . Revise Attachment B to the application to include the reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area). 6. All proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) must be placed underground. 7. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 8 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 12. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in. the Staff Report: That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. 15. There is an inconsistency between the architectural plans at the southeast corner of the building. The roof plan and the east and south elevations seem to indicate one layout of the building (with an indentation at the corner), which doesn't agree with the floor plan and site plan (which has it filled in). Which is correct? Revise. 16. West Elevation - There is too much balcony being shown for the western units for the five floors above the ground-level parking (part of living room would be balcony, which is not shown on the floor plan). Revise. 17. Provide a floor plan for Living Floors 6 and 7. 18. Portions of the building, especially on the east (which will be viewed by the traveling public) and west sides, that are rather bland. West wall of units on Living Levels 6 and 7 are vertual blank walls. Improvement is necessary to the facade, through vertical or horizontal banding, variation in building colors, increased fenestration, balconies, building ornamentation, etc. (or combinations of these or others). This relates to the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings for "Height" whereby "the increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance." 19. East Elevation - Floor plans indicate two window in Bedroom #3. Revise. 20. Provide on the Building Elevations the height of the proposed building from BFE to the midpoint of the main pitched roof above the Level 7 unit. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 16 21 rojects) Poe surroundin details (relatin id #1 P bili it i l A li G . g p g rov e response: ty cr er a enera pp ca of HOW this project will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. Unclear of the statement "The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood..." since Belle Harbor is built, Mandalay Beach Club is built, Sandpearl is under construction, Pelican Walk exists across the street (with its future expansion). Unclear of the intent of the statement "The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures" as to whether this relates to the interior of the units or the exterior of the building. Advise/revise. 22. General Applicability criteria #5 response: Unclear if the response was written for this project, since this project is not on Bay Esplanade. Revise. 23 . Beach by Design Guidelines state that "When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress." It is unclear, based on the elevations provided, how this provision is being met. Advise/revise. 24. Attachment D - Criteria #1: a. Provide written information as to how the increased height IS "resulting in an improved building design and appearance". 25 . Provide responses to the additional "attached dwelling" Flexible Development criteria in Attachment B as to HOW this proposal is in compliance with the criteria: a. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. b. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street. c. Off-street parking: 1. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; 2. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. d. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. (ie: Beach by Design Design Guidelines). 26. Attachment B: Criteria #2 a: Revise the response to the current proposal (no reduction to pavement; only a reduction to a trash staging area). 27. Attachment B: Criteria #2 b: Revise the response to the current proposal (no reduction to pavement; only a reduction to a trash staging area). 28. Has there been any consideration given to the building locations for the two residential towers to the west and south for the Sandpearl project (public information available at the Building Department) and the layout of the units in those adjacent towers in relation to the building and unit layout for this proposal? The current proposal has an almost linear unit layout on a north/south basis where the front doors are essentially at the rear of the units and guests must pass by bedrooms (private areas) through a long hallway before they reach the living area (public areas) of the units. Has a different unit configuration been considered where units would be a north and south unit, more squarish in size, with a central elevator and stairs (2) that could have a focal point of orientation to Mandalay Avenue? The top two units could still be stacked in a manner similar to the current proposal, but depending on the better location of the pool on the north side versus the south side of the building (sun angles). Balconies for the units could then be on three sides of the units, potentially producing a facade that isn't so blank facing Mandalay Avenue. Additionally, considering the developed and developing character along Mandalay Avenue south of Baymont Street where buildings are at a (or close to a) zero front setback, Staff would prefer that the building be located closer to the Mandalay Avenue property line (yes, a front setback reduction would be necessary). 29 . Revise Page 1 of the application to correct the parcel number to 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 (not 05/...). Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 5/16/06 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 4/7/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 17 t , 11:20 am Case Number: FLD2006 020(1) 490 MANDALAY A E Owner(s): Mary G Realty Inc 490 Mandalay Ave Clearwater, F] 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac coww4vAll 701 Enterprise Road East Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: 0.4 acres located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height fi-om 35 feet to 86 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.13. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard Applicant: Jerry Figurski, Keith Zayac, Nick Gionis The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Replace sidewalk detail (Sheet 3 of 6) with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109. 2. Relocate concrete driveway note on plan to driveway on north side of site. 3. Accessing the sanitary manhole as proposed will require extensive resurfacing and restoration of asphalt and brick pavers. Applicant shall instead install doghouse manhole in the Baymont Street right-of-way to reduce traffic impact and restoration cost. 4. Sheet #6 will be reviewed when submitted as part of a building permit application; no review/comment will be provided at this time. 5. Show existing and proposed parallel parking spaces along Mandalay in the vicinity of the location where the driveway is to be removed. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Use sewer lateral and cleanout Detail #305. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 16 I . Provide Fire Floaculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. Calculations / Water Study due PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Fire Pump to be located above BFE. Show proposed location PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . A fire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB 4. This building is a high-rise building as measured from the street level which is the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access/setup point. As such you must meet the requirements for highrise buildings per NFPA 101 to include fire control room, generator, pressurized stairways, voice evacuation fire alarm system, smoke protected elevator lobbies. (This list is not all inclusive) Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 5 . Both stairways must exit directly outside building The SW stair is exiting into garage area. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 6. The travel distance within the living units exceeds the 125' limit as required by NFPA 101,30.2.6.2 . Modify to show the change PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 , No issues. Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 . Sheet 5/6 - Indicate in the Plant List what landscape material is being placed in the "blank" areas (sod`?). Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: I . Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant needs to provide the following: 1)a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption 2)soil borings,water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond. 3)a right-of way permit shall be required for any storm work in the Mandalay right of way. Solid Waste: I . No issues. Traffic Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 17 . I . Revise civil plans and building elevations to comply with the follow•flexible development criteria for attached dwellings: "Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level." 2 . The indentation of the building north of the elevator should be dashed in as "building line above," much like the rest of the building has been depicted. 3 . Provide the project value. 4. Sheet 3/6 - Complete General Note #15. 5 . Revise Attachment B to the application to include the reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area). 6 . All proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) must be placed underground. 7 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 8 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records prior to the issuance of any permits; 9 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That prior to issuance of any permit the applicant provide/obtain the following: a. a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption; b. soil borings, water table elevation and double ring infiltrometer test taken at the design bottom elevation of the detention pond; and c. a City right-of-way permit for any storm work in Mandalay Avenue. 15 . There is an inconsistency between the architectural plans at the southeast corner of the building. The roof plan and the east and south elevations seem to indicate one layout of the building (with an indentation at the corner); which doesn't agree with the floor plan and site plan (which has it filled in). Which is correct'? Revise. 16. West Elevation - ]'here is too much balcony being shown for the western units for the five floors above the ground-level parking (part of living room would be balcony, which is not shown on the floor plan). Revise. 17. Provide a floor plan for Living Floors 6 and 7. 18 . Portions of the building, especially on the east (which will be viewed by the traveling public) and west sides, that are rather bland. West wall of units on Living Levels 6 and 7 are vertual blank walls. Improvement is necessary to the facade, through vertical or horizontal banding, variation in building colors, increased fenestration, balconies, building ornamentation, etc. (or combinations of these or others). This relates to the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings for "Height" whereby "the increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance." 19. East Elevation - Floor plans indicate two window in Bedroom #3. Revise. 20. Provide on the Building Elevations the height of the proposed building from BFE to the midpoint of the main pitched roof above the Level 7 unit. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 18 21 . General Applicability criteria #1 response: Provide details (relating toe surrounding projects) of HOW this project xvill be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. Unclear of the statement "The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood..." since Belle Harbor is built, Mandalay Beach Club is built, Sandpearl is under construction, Pelican Walk exists across the street (with its future expansion). Unclear of the intent of the statement "The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures" as to whether this relates to the interior of the units or the exterior of the building. Advise/revise. 22 . General Applicability criteria #5 response: Unclear if the response was written for this project, since this project is not on Bay Esplanade. Revise. 23 . Beach by Design Guidelines state that "When a parking garage abuts a public road or other public place, it will be designed such that the function of the building is not readily apparent except at points of ingress and egress." It is unclear, based on the elevations provided, how this provision is being met. Advise/revise. 24. Attachment D - Criteria #1: a. Provide written information as to how the increased height IS "resulting in an improved building design and appearance". 25 . Provide responses to the additional "attached dwelling" Flexible Development criteria in Attaclinnent B as to HOW this proposal is in compliance with the criteria: a. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. b. Location: The use ol'the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street. c. Off-street parking: 1. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; 2. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and fmishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. d. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. (ie: Beach by Design Design Guidelines). 26. Attachment B: Criteria #2 a: Revise the response to the current proposal (no reduction to pavement; only a reduction to a trash staging area). 27 . Attachment B: Criteria #2 b: Revise the response to the current proposal (no reduction to pavement; only a reduction to a trash staging area). 28 . Has there been any consideration given to the building locations for the two residential towers to the west and south for the Sandpearl project (public information available at the Building Department) and the layout of the units in those adjacent towers in relation to the building and unit layout for this proposal? The current proposal has an almost linear unit layout on a north/south basis where the front doors are essentially at the rear of the units and guests must pass by bedrooms (private areas) before they reach the living area (public areas) of the units. Has a different unit configuration been considered where units would be a north and south unit, more squarish in size, with a central elevator and stairs (2) that could have a focal point of orientation to Mandalay Avenue'? The top two units could still be stacked in a manner similar to the current proposal, but depending on the better location of the pool on the north side versus the south side of the buildinO (sun angles). Balconies for the units could then be on three sides of the units, potentially producing a facade that isn't so blank facing Mandalay Avenue. 29 . Revise Page 1 of the application to correct the parcel number to 08/29/15/16398/000/0570 (not 05/...). Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 5/16/06 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 4/7/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 19 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 9:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Wayne, In regard to your comments 4 & 5. 4 - A comment has been added regarding these parking spaces. 5 - The right turn lane from Baymont was negotiated away by the Sandpearl development team. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:49 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2006-02009 ®? ® aerial.doc existing.doc FLD Map request location.doc zone.doc form.doc Sam Kambourolias GIS Tech. (727) 562-4769 www.myclearwater.com • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 7:35 AM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map.Request for 490 Mandalay Avenue Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2006-02009 for the property at 490 Mandalay Avenue. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne FLD Map request form.doc J?L?7Lo o ? - nz o 09 a $ A 2588 t to a e/ T CIT OF CLEARWATER aty vw a+me_a- 7? ?4 P AN CODUNTY FLORIDA `" PREPARED BY - -- CLEARWATER ,aa -? - - _ PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING I^ ea0 B9 ACH RESUB Qa! 7 Nyrile Ave., Cleawoler, yE 33156 IDO S (vz'?s26-ass 62-4750 Ave., FC P & (727) - \ ® I" h.: ? . C 'n+en n D' H //www.tllNwoler-D.com/City-Depoitments/publlc_MWS/engineer/ 1 e '00 R L BELLE HARBOR 126-18 °ISnoMer. oler l Cit f Cl i d t S 6AYAIOItT S $ 9TRfi T $ earw s Nrn by he y o Public M/ormollen Oslo Me Pudic Wark+ Admi lat-tton/Enginae log and mull DB accepted and used by the -Ipient with Iha_ urMeretOnd®g toot the data i ;-T S0 a ea 6D e0 o renlved was ealleeled for the Ourpose OI deMOpM9 a groph mfrostn,cwm In,enlary. N such. the city or nearwater PWA/E a a I S ' .• v a) u ?' !] x ' s 2 ]I0/ ad CORAL MOTEL CONDO makes no W-Oze9, eapress+d or Impli.d. concerning the oocuraey. completeness, reRaemty. « suitability of this data for any al her portleular use Furthermore. the City of Clearwoler t i b T ] 16 42-1,.14 th he use PWA/E ossumas no Ilabmty whots-, associated w f i uch data ' I ?22?Ot e 1 u < A V f' E . m suse o s tiOIF; i hon .. i di e t t p at I ° n ,S t 540 a mit CONDO g . o c e lec o Per Thl! Atlas page s , For Information about latest r visl- please call PWA/E or w e v „ •so •> ! t' nd ap7 ': 76-9f! ee site. tin our a ` > n. f° Va ! e m0 ` yam ( MANDALAY glao es + V BEACH >. ?a! >: °Iae soo o too 20o 400 gp CLUB B • NI Se t? 122-13 •e ?I I] ?iVt00 . a " p - ' Is ••a p we = 400 SCALE: 1 •• • ? R PAPAYA A ' STREET ° LEGEND: 20al-m 12 > ••f' m •aa x •] 24M ' iaa ] p as 1YD ! •n a na © BLOCK NUMBER •a + ]+ Cn 1234 LOT ADDRESS ' av W 12 T d -CITY LIMITS LINE - 3 , 52>I_zr2e P _ SHADED AREA -PROPERTY •a> ,e § G.,?J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS ,.] IOd n ]a IOd .X , - d z 40 ? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX 2E/01 •aa .7 rIl 23 Ial ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY ]. D y N u O aed Q,o 13•o!O rv l D MTLAZONkNG DESIGNATION e a 21 60 9z ss.s-ez3 ,.• as ,.N ao]._,av 1 1 P E -ZONE LINE v I W.,ER 10, 2 a InE7i-3oi r 1` __ 9 1 .star. O ATP/ 1?? '1 8 ZR 60 ro I 5 1 ___ - -a uany a nu> ea _ ' ax,I-n dz _ -" ?te0 A 8 nraut ml (25) IS lft a a i ? cAVSgw?Y etw e 4 r ' w " TO s? 12 1 3 , P R O P ER" 6y CITY C N , t o 9 o REZONE ORD I Zf 1 N ? I p \ O TER LOT t C UMBIA ?RP$ D.a 132-09 PNW s ` Eabt Channel 9 RE. D S B. 23-60 o -. ]pn_,pa ? 2Td-Id75 1028-92 ° /2 09/0 9/2 002 a DULfwE w eLw a ZONING ATLAS 2 a s o 32/°2 32/03 NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 2 6 7 A 276B a 8 - 29 S - 15 E ? ? 276A ' O C V N O O N O N M rn 0 N .o L i c i to • Pinellas County Property App'r Information: 08 29 15 16398 000 0 Page 2 of 5 08 I 29 ! 15 / 16398 I 000 / 0570 27-Feb-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:47:25 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales MARY 6 REALTY INC OBK: 05685 OPG: 0837 490 MANDALAY AUE CLEARWATER FL 33767-2007 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Rddr: 490 MANDALAY AUE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/1,983 5,6681 223 226,900 (U) I 1925: Book 010 Pgs 042- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 1,100,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exam: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 1,100,000 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exam: 0 Taxable: 1,100,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Math 05 Taxes: 25, 560.92 1) 175 x 100 75.00 17, 500.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 25, 560. 92 6) 0 x 0 00 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 25, 560.92 Short Legal CLEARWATER BEACH PARK LOTS 57,58,59,60,61,62 AND Description 63 & N i0.25FT OF LOT 64 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/27/2006 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 08 29 15 16398 000 016 Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 08 / 29 / 15 / 10398 / 000 0570 :01 27-Feb-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 17:47:25 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Shopping Center Property Address: 490 MANDALAY AUE Prop Use: 321 Land Use: 11 S-truCTura1 ElemenTs Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Prestress Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 24 Bath Tile Hone Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,984 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 6,958 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .20 722 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .25 392 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Cammer?-_ial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 8000 1.75 81000 14,000 14,000 999 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 14,000 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) [14w] FE [ --t] T Fq R http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.usihtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/27/2006 , 1 Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 08 29 15 16398 000 016 v 16380 ? ? BAYMONT 17 2( S1 2/01 4ftht sry P / P A' JP A1 ' PAt ??^V f I, 490 N AN 4nC iLA O r AY A 418 ANDALAY E, SNC 46 u? 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 4 of 5 M 16- Li .r N http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/27/2006 Pinellas Count%' Prope!ITV AI)j) r Information: 08 29 15 16398 000 0? ` U lit. m• r, t i1 t Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen Pare > of s 3? Ay Li1r_ http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 2/27/2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 19, 2006, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Marv G Realty, Inc (Nick Gionis) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (north along Baymont St.) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to plaza, fountain and trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Mandalay Ave.) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to plaza, fountain, pergolas and raised platform) and an increase to the building ht from 35 ft to 82.5 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.8. : [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings 12 condom iniums].490 Mandalay Ave. Clearwater Beach Park Lots 57 - 63 and part of lot 64. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III FLD2006-02009 2. LM Loken Revocable Trust c/o Luvern Loken, Tre (Vern Loken) are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a 16,548 square-ft office building in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 12.92 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 12.42 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to 11.5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 6 ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 12 ft (to building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Program under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.13; (2) to permit nonresidential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 20 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 7.17 ft (to pavement) and deviations to allow the structures (pavement) within the front and side setbacks and to place landscaping on the inside of the buffer fence along the north and west sides of the property, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-204.E; and (3) to permit reductions to the landscape buffer requirements along S. Highland Ave. (east) from 15 ft to 12.92 ft (to pavement), along the north side from 12 ft to 11.5 ft (to pavement) and along the south side from 5 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and to permit a reduction to required interior landscaping from 12 percent to 10.69 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G.(Proposed Use: A 16,548 square-ft office building.) at 1524, 1532 and 1536 S. Highland Ave., Scotia Heights Blk B Lots 1 - 6 and part of lot 7, lots 8-13 and part of lot 14, lots 53-56. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-04024 3. Paradise Cove Clearwater, Inc (Danny Patel, Issam Yared, Richard J Scinta, Jr., Linda M. Fletcher, Michael & Gia Lozicki, Robert E. Smyth, Suzanne M. Givens, John W, Withers) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 927 square-ft multi-use dock for nine slips in the Tourist District, under the provisions of Sec. 3-601. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock of 9 slips for 9 attached dwellings) at 145 Brightwater Dr., Paradise Cove Lots 1-9. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-02011 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.granicus.comNiewPublisher.php?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 09/07/06 FT,T)2006-02009: 362 222 E 13TH STREET CORP *8 MANDALAY LLC 44 EILEEN AVE 2429 N FAIRFAX DR PLAINVIEW NY 1 1803 - 5203 ARLINGTON VA 22201 - 2712 ABOOD, ROBERT G ABOOD, CATHERINE C 2256 MACKENZIE CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2241 AGAMI, DAVID ROMANO, IVETTE NANCY 11 SAN MARCO # 1502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 ALONSO, ARMANDO ALONSO, SHARON 36007 LAKE UNITY NURSERY RD FRUITLAND PARK FL 34731 - 5816 ANGELOCCI, RANDY CROSSLAND, RICHARD 10 PAPAYA ST # 1106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 AUGUSTINE, RICHARD J 10 PAPAYA ST #506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 BJEINC 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 BARRETT, WILLIAM T BARRETT, SHEILA M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 BAUER, CHARLES L PROP LTD 6106 WADE ST LEESBURG FL 34748 - 8099 ABRAHAM, DAVID 11 SAN MARCO ST # 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 AJAY ENDEAVORS INC 12190 CONTEL BLVD BROOKVILLE FL 34613 - ALTNER, MARTIN L ALTNER, JANIS C 212 WATER VIEW CT SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2061 ARRINGTON, WILLIAM H 501 MANDALAY AVE # 910 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 AVERY, JOSEPHINE ULINE, BRADLEY R 521 MANDALAY AVE # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 BADIE, BADIE A 32 BRAELOCH WAY MONROE CT 06468 - 3013 BARYLAK, EDWARD J BARYLAK, CHRYSTINA 3132 BRANCH RIVER RD MANITOWOC WI 54220 - 8717 BAUER, CHARLES L BAUER, JANET W 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 (41 a/ OW BEACH PROPERTIES LLC 10 PAPAYA # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 205E ACHARYA, RAVINDRA P ACHARYA, KALPANA R 47 SAWMILL RD DUDLEY MA 01571 - 5849 ALIDINA, ARIF A ALIDINA, NOORA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 ANDERSEN, LARRY E 2156 BASSWOOD DR LAFAYETTE HILL PA 19444 - 2328 ATKINS, J MICHAEL ATKINS, TERESA K 1613 ELM SHORE DR PORT BYRON IL 61275 - 9092 AXEL, JONATHAN P THE AXEL, CORALS THE 11 SAN MARCO ST APT 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 BAKER, BARRY J BAKER, ANN F 1435 STEVENSON DR LIBERTYVILLE IL 60048 - 2572 BASORE, GREGORY R 1067 WOODWIND TRL HASLETT MI 48840 - 8977 BAYER, DAVID L BAYER, PAMELA R 710 DUNSCORE CT ROSWELL GA 30075 - 6812 BEHESHTI, ALI BEHESHTI, TARANEH BELLE HARBOR LLC BELLE HARBOR OWNERS ASSN INC 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1402 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 501 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 0 • BLRG, ANNA JACOBSEN BERGER, RALPH F LIVING TRUST BICZ, DANIEL S 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1409 7131 ASHVILLE PARK DR BICZ, MARGARET C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 COLUMBUS OH 43235 - 5013 521 MANDALAY AVE # 802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 BIENSTOCK, JOSEPH S BODUCH, RAYMOND T BOMERGER, DAVID RICHARD BIENSTOCK, PHYLLIS BODUCH, LINDA C 990 W OAK ST 10 PAPAYA ST # 701 521 MANDALAY AVE # 303 ZIONSVILLE IN 46077 - 1209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 BOND, GEORGE L JR BONI, JOAN P BOTWICK, ANDREW L BOND, YVONNE N 19 ROCKAWAY ST # 4 BOTWICK, DIANNE S 1215 CAMINO CAPISTRANO CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1739 1422 NW 111TH AVE ROSEVILLE CA 95747 - 6727 CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 - 6448 BOULTON, CARLOS A BRENNAN, JAMES M BROMBOZ, JONATHAN BOULTON, ANN-MARIE OTT, KARYN L BROMBOZ, VICKI 211 WOODLAKE WYNDE 4505 W DALE AVE 11 SAN MARCO ST # 304 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2174 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 BROWN, SHERMAN D BURGESS, PATRICIA M C & M 27 CO LLC BROWN, ANDREA D GRIMM, THOMAS L 136 HARBOR DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 705 3234 N 7TH ST PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 WAUSAU WI 54403 - 3007 CAMBAS, NICHOLAS A CASCIOLA, GENE M CASO, RONALD 2939 ELYSIUM WAY CASCIOLA, SHEILA CASO, BERNADETTE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1414 7000 WEDDINGTON BROOK DR 3 SUTPHIN AVE WEDDINGTON NC 28104 - 7274 MATAWAN NJ 07747 - 3315 CHACONAS, ANGELINE CHALAVARYA, GOPAL CHASE, CHRISTIAN W 6 S MYRTLE AVE CHALAVARYA, SADHNA BAILEY, MATHEW S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5518 1510 JASMINE AVE 505 MANDALAY AVE # 71 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 5242 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1718 CHASE, WALTER W CHRISTOLINI, CHARLES JR CHRISTOPHER, TODD C CHASE, JUDITH A CHRISTOLINI, DARLENE E CHRISTOPHER, WANDA 11 SAN MARCO ST 1759 MOREY RD 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2066 SHELDON VT 05483 - 8343 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 CHRISTOPHER, TODD CIOCIA, JAMES CLARK, ROBERT B CHRISTOPHER, WANDA CIOCIA, TRACY CLARK, SANDRA H 3743 PRESIDENTIAL DR 187-11 PEPPER PIKE 13201 CLAYTON RD PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 1075 LUTZ FL 33558 - 5315 ST LOUIS MO 63131 - 1002 CLARK, TERRY M CLASSON, STEPHEN J Clearwater Beach Association CLARK, JANE H CLASSON, KAREN L Jay Keyes, 16756 WHITES STORE RD 801 HERITAGE RD STE A 100 Devon Drive, BOYDS MD 20841 - 9673 DEPERE WI 54115 - 3292 Clearwater, FL 33767 0 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition CLEARWATER REAL ESTATE HLDGS COLLETTE, JAMES A Sondra Kerr, President VAUSE, ROBERT W P.O. Box 8204 PO BOX 14184 10 PAPAYA ST # 806 Clearwater, FL 33758 TAMPA FL 33690 - 4184 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 COLLINS, WALTER W COLTER, GEORGE COLTON, JAMES A 9813 COMPASS POINT WAY COLTER, HELEN COLTON, LORI B TAMPA FL 33615 - 4218 521 MANDALAY AVE # 702 421 HAMPTON GREEN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 PEACHTREE CITY GA 30269 - 2712 COMPTON VACATION HOME CORDEIRO, JACK REVOCABL COOKE FAMILY REV TRUST CORDEIRO, ALDA COMPTON, VICKI L THE 12 GAGE GIRLS RD 8209 W CRENSHAW ST 5712 SANDALFOOT CIR BEDFORD NH 03110 - 4704 TAMPA FL 33615 - 2118 PLANO TX 75093 - 2912 CORE, CHRIS W COSTAWAY LLC COSTELLO, JAMES 124 CHARTWELL 15 HEATH WAY COSTELLO, JENNY L BEACONSFIELD QC H9W 1C3 00030 BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 9513 19103 MANDARIN GROVE PL CANADA TAMPA FL 33647 - 3095 COULTER, WAYNE R COX, THOMAS D CRANOR, DAVID K COULTER, PAMELA W COX, SHARON K CRANOR, TOWANA K 4407 W DALE ST 10 PAPAYA ST # 706 12043 HAWTHORN RIDGE TAMPA FL 33609 - 3706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 FISHERS IN 46037 - 8822 CRISTIE ANNE ENTERPRISES LLC CRUDELE, MICHAEL J CUNNINGHAM, TODD W PO BOX 120 CRUDELE, SHIELA M 9703 RHAPSODY DR BLOOMINGDALE IL 60108 - 0120 1516 FOX HILL PL VIENNA VA 22181 - 3240 VALRICO FL 33594 - 4021 D'AMORE, EUGENE R DAVIS, DEXTER C DAVIS, DEXTER C 11 SAN MARCO ST # 607 ALEXANDER-DAVIS, LISA DAVIS, LISA ALEXANDER CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 5806 GALLEON WAY 501 MANDALAY AVE # 1009 TAMPA FL 33615 - 3634 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 DAY, WILLIAM A THE DEFERRARI, DIANA DELLATERZA, ROBIN 1968 LAKEVIEW AVE 110 HARBOR DR DELLATERZA, JAMES DRACUT MA 01826 - 3210 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 10 CYPRESS DR CEDAR KNOLLS NJ 07927 - 1558 DENTICE, JOSEPH F THE DIGIANNANTONIO, GILBERT DIMMITT, LARRY H JR DENTICE, ELLEN L THE DIGIANNANTONIO, PAULETTE 150 WILLADEL DR 5053 LAKEVIEW CT 3717 WOODRIDGE PL BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1942 OCONOMOWOC WI 53066 - PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 2449 DIORIO, RONALD L DORSCH, DANIEL J DOUSE, ROBERT S DIORIO, SANDRA R DORSCH, CYNTHIA P DOUSE, GWEN A 3944 NORTH FIELD DR 6326 W MACLAURIN DR 1605 CLAUDIA WAY BELLBROOK OH 45305 - 8802 TAMPA FL 33647 - 1163 NORTH WALES PA 19454 - 3679 • DOWNS, JANE 50 JONATHAN DR NEW ULM MN 56073 - 3343 ECKALL INVESTMENTS LLC 2201 4TH AVE N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33713 - 7911 EGAN, LYNNE A 10 PAPAYA ST # 1604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2057 ELSAKR, ASHRAF ELSAKR, MONA 808 SMOKERISE BLVD PORT ORANGE FL 32127 - 7783 EPSTEIN, JOEL EPSTEIN, DIANE A 40 DEERPATH CT OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2054 EKREN TRUST 3061 DOXBERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2003 ENGEBRETSEN,ARDEN B ENGEBRETSEN, ELEANORE A 10 PAPAYA ST # 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2058 EQUITABLE HOLDING CO LLC 7667 EQUITABLE DR # 201 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 - 4626 • EGAN, JOHN M 10 PAPAYA ST # 1604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2057 ELIAS, SCOTT D 1435 N CLEVELAND # E CHICAGO IL 60610 - 1135 ENTEL, ROBERT J 521 MANDALAY AVE APT 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 ESPOSITO, TONY 501 MANDALAY AVE # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1710 F S N PROPERTIES LLC FALLER, JANET L PERSONAL RESID FALLON, JOSEPH 9909 RACETRACK RD FALLER, JANET L THE FALLON, SHEILA TAMPA FL 33626 - 4458 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1209 1 RIVERSIDE PL UNIT 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 COVINGTON KY 41011 - 1766 FARRELL, BRIAN M FARRELL, CYNTHIA B 5116 WESTSHORE DR NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 8007 FERRELL, CLIFFORD N FERRELL, ROSEMARIE A 2328 COLGATE DR FAYETTEVILLE NC 28304 - 5309 FERRO, MICHAEL P 3003 SOUTH WELLS CHICAGO IL 60616 - 2739 FISHER, PAMELA M FISHER, LOUIS R 907 BUNKER VIEW DR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2813 FLOTO, RONALD J FLOTO, NANCY C 54 SASSOON ROAD POKFULAM 00000 - HONG KONG GAREL-JONES, PHILIP THE GAREL-JONES, BEATA THE 120 LANSDOWNE RD S OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - CANADA FISHER, PAMELA FISHER, NELSON J 817 BUNKERVIEW DR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2812 FULLBACH INVESTMENTS LLC 2201 4TH ST N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 GAUDIN, DANIELE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 FLORIN, WOLFGANG M FLORIN, SUSAN 13072 PONTOFINO TRINITY FL 34655 - GAHERTY, JOHN B SR GAHERTY, CECILIA G 5527 S PARK AVE HINSDALE IL 60521 - 5061 GELEP, MARY H GELEP, PAULA 2020 BAYSHORE DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3425 GIANFILIPPO, JOHN F GIANFILIPPO, JOHN GIANNAS, SPIRO P GIANFILIPPO, LAURA L BURKETT, FRANKLIN S GIANNAS, STATHIA P 162 DEVON DR 1775 CEDAR WAXWING CT 25745 SANTOS WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6676 WESLEY CHAPEL FL 33544 - 5513 i • GILBERT, DONNA J GIBSON, PAUL F GIBSON, PAUL F GILBERT HAROLD E 521 MANDALAY AVE # 610 521 MANDALAY AVE , 10 PAPAYA ST # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1700 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 GONZALEZ, EDWARD A GRANT ERIC GREENBERG, ROBYN B GONZALEZ, MARITZA , 1004 ROYAL PASS RD 11 SAN MARCO ST # 804 9400 LAWS RD TAMPA FL 33602 - 5708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 CLEARMONT FL 34714 - 9262 GRIECO, DANIEL J II GRUBER CRAIG M HAIST, SCOTT J GRIECO, DIANE Y , 10 PAPAYA ST APT 502 HAIST, MELISSA KAY 521 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 3659 JUSTIN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1700 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3603 HALE, CAROLYN SMITH HALL, ROGER W HALLERAN, EDWARD M FIELDS, ELIZABETH SMITH HALL, SYLVIA M SIKA, STEPHEN 1107 CONCORD ST 521 MANDALAY AVE # 803 1005 VICTORIA DR CHATTANOOGA TN 37405 - 3101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5749 HALLERAN, EDWARD M HANNA, ASHRAF F HANNA, VICTORIA SIKA, STEPHEN HANNA, MIRANDA Z HANNA, ATIF 11 SAN MARCO ST # 303 3509 SHORELINE CIR 29W 471 SUNSET RIDGE RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 BARTLETT IL 60103 - 2047 HARMON, THOMAS S JR HARTMAN, DOLORES M THE HARTMAN, JEFFREY E HARMON, DEANNE L UTA 3-30-82 HARTMAN, MARISA A 3321 W SEVILLA AVE 1850 SAN MATEO DR 5 CORD GRASS LN TAMPA FL 33629 - DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3719 OLD LYME CT 06371 - 2080 HAYNES ALVIN S HEIDI INVESTMENT TRUST HAYDON, CHARLES R , HAYNES BITA P BENJAMIN BUILDERS REALTY 1601 DRUID RD E , 501 MANDALAY AVE # 401 TRUST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4512 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 69 MASS AVE LUNENBERG MA 01462 - 1212 HEILMAN FAMILY LTD PTNSHP HEILMANS RESTAURANTS INC HILDEBRANDT, MARK THE 941 BAY ESPLANADE 447 MANDALAY AVE 33 OLD LAKE RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2013 HAWTHORN WOODS IL 60047 - 8018 HIND, GRAHAM R M SILVER LODGE TWENTYPENCE RD HILL, ANNE M THE WILBURTON HOERNIG, LAURA 2510 S DUNDEE ST CAMBRIDGESHIRE CB63RN E LY ELY 337 RIVER BEND RD TAMPA FL 33629 - 6411 - 00009 GREAT FALLS VA 22066 - 4138 UNITED KINGDOM HOERNIG, OTTO W HORVATH, KLARA HULLING, DON C HOERNIG, JUANITA S ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III HULLING, TRICE D 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1201 11 SAN MARCO ST # 506 14008 SHADY SHORES DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 TAMPA FL 33613 - 1931 \J HURLEY, G JOHN HUNTER HOTEL CO HURLEY, MAUREEN JOYCE PO BOX 7230 22 FOXTAIL CIR DES MOINES IA 50309 - 7230 CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE CO 80113 - 4125 HYDUK, RANDY ISHAK, REDA H HYDUK, APRIL BISHAY, MANAR 20539 COUNTRYSIDE DR 12 PINEWOOD HILLS MACOMB MI 48044 - 3589 LONGMEADOW MA 01106 - 1663 IYER, VENKIT S J & M PROP APOLLO BEACH IYER, LAKSHMI V 907 BUNKER VIEW DR 3469 SHORELINE CIR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2813 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 J M C FAMILY INVESTMENTS LTD J N E BEACH CONDOS LLC 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 6326 MACLAURIN DR ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 TAMPA FL 33647 - 1163 JENNINGS, MARK K JOHNSON 2003 LIV TRUST JENNINGS, VICKI B JOHNSON, GEORGE A THE 8471 FLOWERING CHERRY LN 10 PAPAYA ST # 401 LAUREL MD 20723 - 1010 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 JOYCE, JILL E KAESTNER, JOHN T 521 MANDALAY AVE # 602 KAESTNER, JOANN M CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 777 CARMAN MEADOWS DR BALLWIN MO 63021 - 7174 KAHRS, CAROLYN J KAIZER, JEFFREY R KAHRS, HENRY G KAIZER, LISA B 4834 QUILL CT 3303 LEGAL CREST DR PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3699 LONGWOOD FL 32779 - KARTES, BOB KEIR, LEONARD KARTES, MARIA KEIR, BERNTRUD 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1406 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2076 KELLY, THOMAS L THE KER, G CAMERON KELLY, KATHLEEN F THE KER, LISA A 11 SAN MARCO ST # 401 2426 BUTTERNUT CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2252 KLABISCH, MATTHEW M MILTON M KLEINBERG KLABISCH, SUSAN M , MARSHA A KLEINBERG 11348 CEDARWOOD CT , 6034 COUNTRY CLUB OAKS PL FRANKFORT IL 60423 - 7854 OMAHA NE 68152 - 2009 • HYC, PETER HYC, ANDY 505 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1716 IVERSON, DONALD D 1001 SAN MARCO ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - J E C FUNDING INC PO BOX 4689 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4689 JACOBSEN, GLENN C JACOBSEN, BARBARA D 6 FERRAND WOODS SAINT LOUIS MO 63124 - 1244 JOPPERT, MARCOS SNODGRASS, SUSAN M 5010 W THE RIVIERA ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 3613 KAHLER, PERRY E KAHLER, VICKI LEE 8927 MAGNOLIA CHASE CIR TAMPA FL 33647 - 2220 KAROUNOS, THEODORE P KAROUNOS, LORRAINE J 444 PINE HILL RD LEONIA NJ 07605 - 1420 Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404, Safety Harbor, FL 34695 KIEFFER, ALAN L KIEFFER, NELLI L 521 MANDALAY AVE # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 KNOWLTON, JOHN P THE KNOWLTON, CATHIE L THE W180 N8217 DESTINY DR MENOMONEE FALLS WI 53051 - 3503 0 • KNUTSON, WILLIAM R II KOCH, MYRON KOENIG, NORBERT KNUTSON, CAROLE M KOCH, ELIZABETH KOENIG, BRUNHILDE 501 MANDALAY AVE # 802 501 MANDALAY AVE # 810 44 EILEEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 PLAINVIEW NY 11803 - 5203 KOKOMO PROPERTIES LLC KOPANAKIS, WILLIAM A KOSENE, STACY 657 SOUNDVIEW DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 402 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1102 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 4246 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 KOVACS, ALEX G KOTCHMAN, CASEY J THE KOVACS, SANDEE G KOVACS, VIOLET K 8442 125TH CT 323 6TH AVE N 23 ROCKAWAY ST SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 3200 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1739 2549 KOZMINSKI, JACEK KROLL, WOLFGANG KULKARNI, VINEET KOZMINSKI, GRAZYNA KROLL, LILLI NAGALE, VISHWANATH 4758 S PULASKI RD 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 3426 DORAL DR CHICAGO IL 60632 - 4114 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 WATERLOO IA 50701 - 4628 KUNIS, SABINA L B J LLC LA BELLE ELECTRIC INC KUNIS, NAUM 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD 24546 21 MILE RD 501 MANDALAY AVE # 801 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 MACOMB MI 48042 - 5111 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 LA SAL MOTEL CONDO ASSN PO BOX 1054 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 1054 LEBRON, GEORGE LEBRON, SONIA DUDZIAK 506 TAMARACK DR BARTLETT IL 60103 - 1515 LAMBRINIDES FAMILY IRREV TRUST LATCH TRUST 2175 VALLEY VIEW DR 43 CLOUD VIEW RD ROCKY RIVER OH 44116 - 2860 SAUSALITO CA 94965 - 2006 LEE, PAUL J LEVINE, RICHARD LEE, AGNES S LEVINE, BARBARA 9715 STONECLIFF CT 5047 OTIS AVE CLARENCE NY 14031 - 2439 TARZANA CA 91356 - 4207 LEVY, MARK S LIEBERMAN, LAWRENCE T LOCKETT, THERESA LEVY, DEBORAH T LIEBERMAN, DEBORAH S 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1003 10005 RADELIFFE DR 10 WILLOWOOD LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2511 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2058 LOWE, JEFF LOWRY, RICHARD M LYLE, JOHN F LOWE, KATHY LOWRY, ALEXIS LYLE, NANCY S 700 DEER VUE LN 1648 RIPARIAN DR PMB 247 FENTON MO 63026 - 3562 NAPERVILLE IL 60565 - 4173 8905 KINGSTON PIKE # 12 KNOXVILLE TN 37923 - 5021 M B C PROPERTIES II LLC MACK, DAVID A REVOCABLE TRUST MACRE, DANIEL M 4500 NORTHWOODS LN MACK, DAVID A THE MACRE, ANNETTE BLOOMINGTON IN 47404 - 9420 30 JELLIFF LN 505 MANDALAY AVE # 75 SOUTHPORT CT 06890 - 1482 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1718 • MAGRATH, JAMES P MAGRATH, CAROL A 2 PRITCHARD LN WESTPORT CT 06880 - 5633 MAGUIRE, PAUL J PO BOX 2925 SAN RAMON CA 94583 - 7925 MAJEWSKI, DENISE M TR MALACHOWSKI, JERRY SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINE J MALACHOWSKI, DOROTHY 43 LAKE ADALYN DR 1426 SEMAR CT SOUTH BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 9542 MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 - 2984 MANDALAY BEACH CLUB CONDO ASSN 2201 4TH ST N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 MANDALAY BEACH CLUB LTD 2201 4TH ST N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 MANDALAY LAND TRUST 3711 SWANN AVE TAMPA FL 33609 - 4521 MAROTTOLI,ANTHONY 10 PAPAYA ST # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 MAZAS LAND TRUST MAZAS, BILL W THE 1600 GULF BLVD # 7117 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 MC DERMOTT, JAMES T DRAPP, SHANNON M 501 MANDALAY AVE # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 MC SWIGGIN, JAMES MC SWIGGINS, CHERYL A 12 SAXONY ST CLIFTON PARK NY 12065 - 1655 MESTAS, DONALD M JR MESTAS, CAROL S 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - MANION, JOSEPH M MANION, JANINE M 10118 BENNINGTON DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2406 MARRULLIER, ALAN H 501 MANDALAY AVE # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 MC CARTHY, EUGENE REV TRUST 2505 ENTERPRISE RD CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1100 MC DERMOTT, JAMES T DRAPP, SHANNON M 521 MANDALAY DR # 904 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 MEEHAN, THOMAS P 521 MAN DALAY AVE # 810 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 MIHOLICS, JOHN C MIHOLICS, MARIA T 18 WINGATE PL YONKERS NY 10705 - 1533 0 MAJEWSKI, DENISE M THE SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINE J 43 LAKE ADALYN DR S SOUTH BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 9542 MAN DALAY 802 PO BOX 120 BLOOMINGDALE IL 60108 - 0120 MANDALAY BUILDING PARTNERSHIP 499 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2045 MARCO, SAN TRUST CHASE, WALTER W BEN 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 MARY G REALTY INC 490 MADALAY AVE CLEARWATER., FL 33767-2007 MC CULLOUGH, JACKIE E 744 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1411 MC LAY, DAVID THE PO BOX 7153 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 7153 MENKE DEV 1053 ST GREGORY ST CINCINNATI OH 45202 - 1733 MIKHAIL, MAGUED MARZOUK, CHRISTIANE 591 BELTED KINGFISHER DR N PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6149 MILLINGTON, CHARLES J MINA, GEORGE I MOHR, GREGORY A MILLINGTON, JULIA B MINA, AMAL A MOHR, KATHLEEN L 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1006 4783 4783 EDGE PARK DR R FL 34677 - 4845 2873 ROEHAMPTON CLOSE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 TARPON SPGS FL 34688 - 8426 CJ MOLLER, ANDREW K MOMESSO, NORELLA N MORRIS, MICHELLE V 12175 OXBOW DR 10 JONQUILLE 29 GAYLORD GLEN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 - 4261 KIRKLAND QC H9H 5A3 00030- WATERBURY CT 06708 - 2100 CANADA MOULIS, JAMES M MOULTS, SUSAN B 3302 ROCKY BEACH RD MC HENRY IL 60051 - 9669 NAGALE, VISHWANATH T NAGALE, PUSHPAMALA V 521 MANDALAY AVE # 508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 NOLL, STEPHEN A NOLL, DEBORAH V 501 MANDALAY AVE # 701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 NOVOGRATZ, JOSEPH 7667 EQUITABLE DR EDEN PRARIE MN 55344 - 3696 OLIVER, ROBERT OLIVER, CHARLOTTE B 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 P S B CREDIT SERV INC PO BOX 38 PRINSBURG MN 56281 - 0038 PAPAYA TRUST 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 PARAMOUNT LLC 1803 BRIAR CREEK BLVD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4696 MUDD, JAMES A MUDD, CECELIA K 6919 CHANCELLOR DR CEDAR FALLS IA 50613 - 6956 NEAL, RALPH C NEAL, JULIE A 4622 OSAGE CT GREENBAY WI 54313 - 9531 NORUS, KEVIN 11816 MARBLEHEAD DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2553 O'HANLEN, PETER O'HANLEN, TERRIE 10 PAPAYA ST #1102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 MURRAY, SUSAN L 902 ANCHORAGE RD TAMPA FL 33602 - 5754 NEUWOLF PARTNERS 2100 CLEARWATER DR OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1927 NOVICKY, STEVEN D NOVICKY, KIMBERLY M 5850 DEER SPRING RUN CANFIELD OH 44406 - 7613 OLIVER, BRIAN C OLIVER, JEANINE H 3739 MULLENHURST DR -2056 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3661 ORISSA PROPERTIES LTD 31 BROAD ST ST HELIER JERSEY JE4 CXW 00000 CHANNEL ISLANDS P S B CREDIT SERVICES INC 508 3RD ST PRINSBURG MN 56281 - 3700 PAPPAS, PETER C 225 ROBINSON ST # 540 ORLANDO FL 32801 - 4321 PAULL, DENNIS M PAULL, DIANE P 10104 RADCLIFFE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2512 P K & J KINC 5020 CENTRAL AVE ST PETERSBURG FL 33707 - 1942 PACK, JAMES D PACK, MARY B 30146 E TOPAZ DR SCOTTSDALE AZ 85258 - PARADES, ANTONIO M 10 PAPAYA ST # 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2055 PECORARO, ERNEST A PECORARO, NYDIA 11 SAN MARCO. ST # 112 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2066 PENN COMMONS LP PERNICE, SALVATORE J PERRY, GREGORY G 871 BEAVER DR PERNICE, BARBARA F LAHN, MONICA L DUBOIS PA 15801 - 2511 3 N 614 CENTRAL CT 1574 SHINING ORE DR ADDISON IL 60101 - 3052 BRENTWOOD TN 37027 - 2218 • • PERTILE, RICHARD K PETERS, MICHAEL L PERTILE, DEBORAH J PETERS, STEPHANIE S P NICK A 1137 MARINA DR 22 CLYDE GRUVER RD PO O BOX 580 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 6713 BINGHAMTON NY 13901 - 6022 WAYNESVILLE OH 45068 - 0580 PFAFF, ROBERT PFAFF, BETTY 521 MANDALAY AVE # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 PLANES, REGINA M 32700 US HIGHWAY 19 N PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 3119 POMS, ALAN M 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1007 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 E SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 RECEVEUR, RONALD L 6012 REGAL SPRINGS DR LOUISVILLE KY 40205 - 3319 REISS, KENNETH P 11 SAN MARCO ST # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 ROBULAK, KENNETH J ROBULAK, PATRICIA J 521 MANDALAY AVE # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 ROSSDALE MGMT INC 120 LANSDOWNE RD S OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - CANADA PILATO, SAM A PILATO, TALMA 3257 NICKS PL CLEARWATER FL 33761 PITTMAN, C CHRISTOPHER PITTMAN, KAREN G 1099 SHIPWATCH CIR -2017 TAMPA FL 33602 - 5736 PLANES, REGINA 854 CYPRESS LAKEVIEW CT TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 7307 POOLE, WILLIAM L III ROBINSON, JOHN CONNIE JR 3 HUNTERS CROSSING CT THE WOODLANDS TX 77381 - 4757 RAGHAVAN,CHAKRAVARTHY RAGHAVAN,VASANTHY 8918 SOUTHERN BREEZE DR ORLANDO FL 32836 - 5012 REHKEMPER, PHILIP A REHKEMPER, BARBARA A 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 RENDEL, JEROLD S TRUST 660 SNUG ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1829 RODWELL, ERIC V . RODWELL, DONNA M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 408 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 ROTH, ELIZABETH W 8826 NAUTILUS DR TAMPA FL 33635 - 1339 PODGURSKI, MICHAEL A PODGURSKI, LINDA G 1125 W POWDERHORN RD MACHANICSBURG PA 17050 - 2007 POTTER, PASCHOALENA 463 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2033 RAMOS, JAMES A RAMOS, CONNIE R 501 MANDALAY AVE # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1707 REINHARDT, MARK REINHARDT, CONNIE K N3080 MEADE ST APPLETON WI 54913 - 9571 RIGBY, GREGORY S RIGBY, CAROLE J 124 OWASCO ST AUBURN NY 13021 - 4114 ROSCOE, GREGORY J ROSCOE, LINDA L PO BOX 308 DUBOIS PA 15801 - 0308 ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III 2112 WATERS AVE TAMPA FL 33604 - 2748 ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III ROWLAND, CLARENCE E RUKAVINA, JAMES HORVATH, KLARA HORVATH, KLARA RUKAVINA, DIANNE 11 SAN MARCO ST # 602 11 SAN MARCO ST # 506 BOX 6448 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 EDSON AB T7E 1T8 00030 - CANADA 0 0 SAID, NADER SALTZMAN, MURRAY SAMEE, AHMED B SAID, HALA SALTZMAN, BARBARA 1182 PINE RIDGE CIR # E3 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1007 1170 GULF BLVD # 306 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 6423 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2780 SAMPSON, THOMAS A SAND KEY CONSULTING LLC SAND KEY CONSULTING LLC SAMPSON, CAROLYN L 1015 NORTH RIVER WALK E BOBAK, WLADYSLAW 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1202 CHICAGO IL 60610 - 7398 180 DINAH RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 MEDINAH IL 60157 - SANDOZ, DAVID C SCHAEFER, RANDY THE SCHECHTER, JANIS ILENE SANDOZ, ANN L 3225 S MACDILL AVE # 268 REVOCAB 523 N OKLAHOMA AVE TAMPA FL 33629 - 8171 12103 MARBLEHEAD DR MORTON IL 61550 - 2373 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2505 SERAG, SHERIF SHEPPARD, KERILYN LEWIS-SERAG, MAHA SHEAR, MARILYN F SHEPPARD, KRISTIN 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1206 2650 MCCORMICK DR STE 130 328 SIX MILE RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1062 WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - 9565 SHIVERS, EDWARD T SIINO, WILLIAM J SMITH, DONALD F THE SHIVERS, HAZEL E SIINO, MICHAEL T SMITH, MARY H THE 10 PAPAYA ST # 505 13519 FALCON POINTE DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 ORLANDO FL 32837 - 5327 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 SMITH, MERLE W SNYDER, CLIFFORD D SOBEL, KATHY SMITH, DIANA T SNYDER, MARYLIN V 11 SAN MARCO ST # 503 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1201 1650 WACHTLER AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 SAINT PAUL MN 55118 - 3745 SOBOTKA, JOSEPH J SOTEREANOS, STELLA SPARKS, SUSAN M SOBOTKA, SYLVIA R SOTEREANOS, STACEY 11 SAN MARCO ST N # 1105 52 THOROUGHBRED DR 307 S DITHRIDGE # 808 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 HOLLAND PA 18966 - 2570 PITTSBURGH PA 15213 - 3519 ST JOHN, DENNIS THE STANISLAWEK, DANIEL STENBERG, ANDREW ST JOHN, VALERIE STANISLAWEK, GRETA 10 PAPAYA ST # 301 342 E JERICHO TPKE 501 MANDALAY AVE # 309 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 MINCOLA NY 11501 - 2111 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1707 STEPHANS, SUSAN STOJAK, JAMES L SUCHARSKI, FRANK J STEPHANS, DORIS STOJAK, ROBIN L SUCHARSKI, CATHERINE J 803 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 3964 MULLENHURST DR 248 AMERICAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3004 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3665 RICHBORO PA 18954 - 1141 SWIDEREK, TIMOTHY J TADROS, HANI S TANKEL, ROBERT L SWIDEREK, JOSEPH A YASSAOUI, SUZANNE TANKEL, TERRI G 4540 WEATHERVANE DR 2184 LAURENCE DR 1022 MAIN ST # D ALPHARETTE GA 30022 - 3759 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6466 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5237 0 0 TAYLOR, DAVID R WALTERS, JAMES 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1004 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 THOMAS-KIRSCHKE, HEIDI 525 MANDALAY AVE # 24 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1798 TSANGARIS, WILMA B TSANGARIS, NICHOLAS 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2076 VISOSO, ROBERTO VISOSO, GRACIELA 521 MANDALAY AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 WANDACHOWICZ, BOGDAN 10 PAPAYA ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2055 WEBER, JED P WEBER, JILL E 505 MANDALAY AVE N # 42 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1717 WILSON, CHRISTINE DEFERRARI WILSON, MARK A 136 HARBOR DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 YOFAN, AVI YOFAN, JACKIE 10 PAPAYA ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 TEJEDA, RAFAEL E TEMA INVESTMENTS TEJEDA, IDELFIA A 3135 SW 3RD AVE 3516 WOODRIDGE PL MIAMI FL 33129 - 2711 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 2434 THWAITE, EDWARD TOUCHTON, JOANN THWAITE, PATRICIA TOUCHTON, WALTER W 15 LOOKOUT POINT TRL 10 PAPAYA ST # 702 TOTOWA NJ 07512 - 1611 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 TURLEY, STEWART URINO, FRANK N & NATALIE TRUST TURLEY, LINDA A 1627 MIDNIGHT PASS WAY 10 PAPAYA ST # 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1821 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2057 VITOLA, JOHN R VITOLA, GEORGINE A W J C C IRREVOCABLE RESIDENCE 218 S BROAD ST 10 PAPAYA ST # 606 BROOKSVILLE FL 34601 - 2832 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 WARD, MICHAEL S WARSTLER FAMILY TRUST WARD, GISELLE V WARSTLER, ARTHUR K THE 407 SOUTH ROYAL PALM WAY 521 MANDALAY AVE # 905 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3728 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 WILLIAMS, BERNABE REVOCABLE WELLS, DARCY L TR NALEY, STEVE W WILLIAMS, BERNABE THE 705 BAY ESPLANADE AVE 1204 SUNCAST LN STE 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 ELDORADO HILLS CA 95762 - 9665 YEAROUT, JANE R YOFAN, ABRAHAM REAL ESTATE YEAROUT, JANET A TRU 806 NARCISSUS YOFAN, AVI THE CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 10 PAPAYA ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 YOURTH, BRADLEY J YOURTH, VALERIE R 501 MANDALAY AVE # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 ZAKHARY, ATEF S 11 SAN MARCO ST # 603 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 ZAMANI, SAM S ZILISCH,,BARBARA L THE FEIZIPOUR, MAHVASH 11 SAN MARCO ST # 708 1957 LOGAN MANOR DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 RESTON VA 20190 - 3276 f CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, June 20, 2006, beginning at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Richard A & Angelia Tellone are requesting Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density to allow the continuation of 2 existing detached dwellings (where only one dwelling unit is permitted today) in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Sec 6-109.C. (Proposed Use: Continuation of 2 existing detached dwellings) at 913 & 915 Jeffords St, Milton Park Blk 2, Lot 3, and N Y2 Vac Alley adj on S. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-03014 2. L B R Holdings, Inc. & LBR Holdings, III (Douglas Birch) are requesting Flexible Development Application to reduce the south (rear) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft within the Office (O) District, pursuant to Sec 2-1003.F of the Community Development Code; and to allow non-residential off-street parking within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District with deviations to the south (front) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft and west (front) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft; and to allow the encroachment of a drive aisle within the required sight visibility triangles along South Hillcrest Ave as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Secs 2-204.C and E of the Community Development Code; with a reduction to the east (side) perimeter landscape buffer from 12 ft to 10 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program pursuant to Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Office and Non- Residential Off-Street Parking) at 1401 Court St & 1400 Rogers St, Breeze Hill Blk E, Lots 8-11. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-11114 3. Marv G Realty, Inc (Nick Gionis) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with a reduction to the front (north along Baymont St) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area) and an increase to the building height from 35 ft to 82.5 ft (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.8. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (12 condominiums)] at 490 Mandalay Ave, Clearwater Beach Park Lots 57-63 and part of Lot 64. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-02009 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to 0 0 personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, CIVIC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 06-08-06 FLD2006-02f, 365 doWtOg 222 E 13TH STREET CORP 444EILEEN AVE PLAINVIEW NY 11803 - 5203 AE300D, ROBERT G ABOOD, CATHERINE C 2256 MACKENZIE CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2241 AGAMI, DAVID ROMANO, IVETTE NANCY 11 SAN MARCO # 1502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 ALONSO,ARMANDO ALONSO, SHARON 36007 LAKE UNITY NURSERY RD FRUITLAND PARK FL 34731 - 5816 ANGELOCCI, RANDY CROSSLAND, RICHARD 10 PAPAYA ST # 1106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 AUGUSTINE, RICHARD J 10 PAPAYA ST #506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 BJEINC 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 BARRETT, WILLIAM T BARRETT, SHEILA M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 BASORE, GREGORY R 1067 WOODWIND TRL HASLETT MI 48840 - 8977 808 MANDALAY LLC 2429 N FAIRFAX DR ARLINGTON VA 22201 - 2712 ABRAHAM, DAVID 11 SAN MARCO ST # 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 AJAY ENDEAVORS INC 12190 CONTEL BLVD BROOKVILLE FL 34613 - ew A W BEACH PROPERTIES LLC 10 PAPAYA # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 ACHARYA, RAVINDRA P ACHARYA, KALPANA R -2060 47 SAWMILL RD DUDLEY MA 01571 - 5849 ALTNER, MARTIN L ALTNER, JANIS C 212 WATER VIEW CT SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2061 ARRINGTON, WILLIAM H 501 MANDALAY AVE # 910 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 AVERY, JOSEPHINE ULINE, BRADLEY R 521 MANDALAY AVE # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 BADIE, BADIE A 32 BRAELOCH WAY MONROE CT 06468 - 3013 BARRETT, WILLIAM T BARRETT, SHEILA M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 408 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 BAUER, CHARLES L PROP LTD 6106 WADE ST LEESBURG FL 34748 - 8099 ALIDINA, ARIF A ALIDINA, NOORA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 ANDERSEN, LARRY E 2156 BASSWOOD DR LAFAYETTE HILL PA 19444 - 2328 ATKINS, J MICHAEL ATKINS, TERESA K 1613 ELM SHORE DR PORT BYRON IL 61275 - 9092 AXEL, JONATHAN P THE AXEL, CORALS THE 11 SAN MARCO ST APT 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 BAKER, BARRY J BAKER, ANN F 1435 STEVENSON DR LIBERTYVILLE IL 60048 - 2572 BARYLAK, EDWARD J BARYLAK, CHRYSTINA 3132 BRANCH RIVER RD MANITOWOC WI 54220 - 8717 BAUER, CHARLES L BAUER, JANET W 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 BAYER, DAVID L BEHESHTI, ALI BELLE HARBOR LLC BAYER, PAMELA R BEHESHTI, TARANEH 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 710 DUNSCORE CT 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1402 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 ROSWELL GA 30075 - 6812 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 0 BELLE HARBOR OWNERS ASSN INC BERG, ANNA JACOBSEN BERGER, RALPH F LIVING TRUST 501 MANDALAY AVE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1409 7131 ASHVILLE PARK DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 COLUMBUS OH 43235 - 5013 BICZ, DANIEL S BIENSTOCK, JOSEPH S BODUCH, RAYMOND T BICZ, MARGARET C BIENSTOCK, PHYLLIS BODUCH, LINDA C 521 MANDALAY AVE # 802 10 PAPAYA ST # 701 521 MANDALAY AVE # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 BOMERGER, DAVID RICHARD BOND, GEORGE L JR BONI* JOAN P BOND, YVONNE N 990 W OAK ST 19 ROCKAWAY ST # 4 ZIONSVILLE IN 46077 - 1209 1215 CAMINO CAPISTRANO CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1739 ROSEVILLE CA 95747 - 6727 BOTWICK, ANDREW L BOULTON, CARLOS A BRENNAN, JAMES M BOTWICK, DIANNE S BOULTON, ANN-MARIE OTT, KARYN L 1422 NW 111TH AVE 211 WOODLAKE WYNDE 4505 W DALE AVE CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 - 6448 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 21 74 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3708 BROMBOZ, JONATHAN BROWN, SHERMAN D BURGESS, PATRICIA M BROMBOZ, VICKI BROWN, ANDREA D GRIMM, THOMAS L 11 SAN MARCO ST # 304 11 SAN MARCO ST # 705 3234 N 7TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 WAUSAU WI 54403 - 3007 C & M 27 CO LLC CAMBAS, NICHOLAS A CASCIOLA, GENE M 136 HARBOR DR 2939 ELYSIUM WAY CASCIOLA, SHEILA PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1414 7000 WEDDINGTON BROOK DR WEDDINGTON NC 28104 - 7274 CASO, RONALD CHACONAS, ANGELINE CHALAVARYA, GOPAL CASO, BERNADETTE 6 S MYRTLE AVE CHALAVARYA, SADHNA 3 SUTPHIN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5518 1510 JASMINE AVE MATAWAN NJ 07747 - 3315 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 5242 CHASE, CHRISTIAN W CHASE, WALTER W CHRISTOLINI, CHARLES JR BAILEY, MATHEW S CHASE, JUDITH A CHRISTOLINI, DARLENE E 505 MANDALAY AVE # 71 11 SAN MARCO ST 1759 MOREY RD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1718 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2066 SHELDON VT 05483 - 8343 CHRISTOPHER, TODD C CHRISTOPHER, TODD CIOCIA, JAMES CHRISTOPHER, WANDA CHRISTOPHER, WANDA CIOCIA, TRACY 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1505 3743 PRESIDENTIAL DR 187-11 PEPPER PIKE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 1075 LUTZ FL 33558 - 5315 CLARK, ROBERT B CLARK, TERRY M CLASSON, STEPHEN J CLARK, SANDRA H CLARK, JANE H CLASSON, KAREN L 13201 CLAYTON RD 16756 WHITES STORE RD 801 HERITAGE RD STE A ST LOUIS MO 63131 - 1002 BOYDS MD 20841 - 9673 DEPERE WI 54115 - 3292 Clearwater Beach Association Jay Keyes 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 COLLETTE, JAMES A VALISE, ROBERT W 10 PAPAYA ST # 806 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 COLTON, JAMES A COLTON, LORI B 421 HAMPTON GREEN PEACHTREE CITY GA 30269 - 2712 CORDEIRO, JACK CORDEIRO, ALDA 8209 W CRENSHAW ST TAMPA FL 33615 - 2118 COSTELLO, JAMES COSTELLO, JENNY L 19103 MANDARIN GROVE PL TAMPA FL 33647 - 3095 CRANOR, DAVID K CRANOR, TOWANA K 12043 HAWTHORNE RIDGE FISHERS IN 46037 - 8822 CRUDELE, MICHAEL J CRUDELE, SHIELA M 1516 FOX HILL PL VALRICO FL 33594 - 4021 DAVIS, DEXTER C ALEXANDER-DAVIS, LISA 5806 GALLEON WAY TAMPA FL 33615 - 3634 DEFERRARI, DIANA 110 HARBOR DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 • Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Sondra Kerr, President P.O. Box 8204 Clearwater, FL 33758 COLLINS, WALTER W 9813 COMPASS POINT WAY TAMPA FL 33615 - 4218 COMPTON VACATION HOME REVOCABL COMPTON, VICKI L THE 5712 SANDALFOOT CIR PLANO TX 75093 - 2912 CORE, CHRIS W 124 CHARTWELL BEACONSFIELD QC H9W 1C3 00030 CANADA COULTER, WAYNE R COULTER, PAMELA W 4407 W DALE ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 3706 CRISTIE ANNE ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 120 BLOOMINGDALE IL 60108 - 0120 CUNNINGHAM, TODD W 9703 RHAPSODY DR VIENNA VA 22181 - 3240 DAVIS, DEXTER C DAVIS, LISA ALEXANDER 501 MANDALAY AVE # 1009 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1703 DELLATERZA, ROBIN DELLATERZA, JAMES 10 CYPRESS DR CEDAR KNOLLS NJ 07927 - 0 CLEARWATER REAL ESTATE HLDGS PO BOX 14184 TAMPA FL 33690 - 4184 COLTER, GEORGE COLTER, HELEN 521 MANDALAY AVE # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 COOKE FAMILY REV TRUST 12 GAGE GIRLS RD BEDFORD NH 03110 - 4704 COSTAWAY LLC 15 HEATH WAY BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 9513 COX, THOMAS D COX, SHARON K 10 PAPAYA ST # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 CRISTIE ANNE ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 120 BLOOMINGDALE IL 60108 - 0120 D'AMORE, EUGENE R 11 SAN MARCO ST # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 DAY, WILLIAM A THE 1968 LAKEVIEW AVE DRACUT MA 01826 - 3210 DENTICE, JOSEPH F THE DENTICE, ELLEN L THE 5053 LAKEVIEW CT 1558 OCONOMOWOC WI 53066 - DIGIANNANTONIO, GILBERT DIMMITT, LARRY H JR DIORIO, RONALD L DIGIANNANTONIO, PAULETTE DIORIO, SANDRA R 3717 WOODRIDGE PL 150 WILLADEL DR BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1942 3944 NORTH FIELD DR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 2449 BELLBROOK OH 45305 - 8802 DORSCH, DANIEL J DORSCH, CYNTHIA P 6326 W MACLAURIN DR TAMPA FL 33647 - 1163 ECKALL INVESTMENTS LLC 2201 4TH AVE N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33713 - 7911 ELIAS, SCOTT D 1435 N CLEVELAND # E CHICAGO IL 60610 - 1135 ENTEL, ROBERT J 521 MANDALAY AVE APT 902 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 ESPOSITO, TONY 501 MANDALAY AVE # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1710 FALLON, JOSEPH FALLON, SHEILA 1 RIVERSIDE PL UNIT 302 COVINGTON KY 41011 - 1766 FERRO, MICHAEL P 3003 SOUTH WELLS CHICAGO IL 60616 - 2739 FLORIN, WOLFGANG M FLORIN, SUSAN 13072 PONTOFINO TRINITY FL 34655 - GAHERTY, JOHN B SR GAHERTY, CECILIA G 5527 S PARK AVE HINSDALE IL 60521 - 5061 DOUSE, ROBERT S DOUSE, GWEN A 1605 CLAUDIA WAY NORTH WALES PA 19454 - 3679 EGAN, JOHN M EGAN, LYNNE A 10 PAPAYA ST # 1604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2057 ELSAKR, ASHRAF ELSAKR, MONA 808 SMOKERISE BLVD PORT ORANGE FL 32127 - 7783 EPSTEIN, JOEL EPSTEIN, DIANE A 40 DEERPATH CT OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2054 F S N PROPERTIES LLC 9909 RACETRACK RD TAMPA FL 33626 - 4458 FARRELL, BRIAN M FARRELL, CYNTHIA B 5116 WESTSHORE DR NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 8007 FISHER, PAMELA M FISHER, LOUIS R 907 BUNKER VIEW DR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2813 FLOTO, RONALD J FLOTO, NANCY C 54 SASSOON ROAD POKFULAM 00000 - HONG KONG GAREL-JONES, PHILIP THE GAREL-JONES, BEATA THE 120 LANSDOWNE RD S OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - CANADA r: DOWNS, JANE 50 JONATHAN DR NEW ULM MN 56073 - 3343 EKREN TRUST 3061 DOXBERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2003 ENGEBRETSEN,ARDEN B ENGEBRETSEN, ELEANORE A 10 PAPAYA ST # 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2058 EQUITABLE HOLDING CO LLC 7667 EQUITABLE DR # 201 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 - 4626 FALLER, JANET L PERSONAL RESID FALLER, JANET L THE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 FERRELL, CLIFFORD N FERRELL, ROSEMARIE A 2328 COLGATE DR FAYETTEVILLE NC 28304 - 5309 FISHER, PAMELA FISHER, NELSON J 817 BUNKERVIEW DR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2812 FULLBACH INVESTMENTS LLC 2201 4TH ST N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 GAUDIN, DANIELE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 GELEP, MARY H GIANFILIPPO, JOHN F GIANFILIPPO, JOHN GELEP, PAUL A GIANFILIPPO, LAURA L BURKETT, FRANKLIN S 2020 BAYSHORE DR 162 DEVON DR 1775 CEDAR WAXWING CT BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3425 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2438 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6676 GIANNAS, SPIRO P GIBSON, PAUL F GIBSON, PAUL F GIANNAS, STATHIA P 521 MANDALAY AVE # 610 521 MANDALAY AVE 25745 SANTOS WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1700 WESLEY CHAPEL FL 33544 - 5513 GILBERT, DONNA J GONZALEZ, EDWARD A GRANT, ERIC GILBERT, HAROLD E GONZALEZ, MARITZA 1004 ROYAL PASS RD 10 PAPAYA ST # 705 9400 LAWS RD TAMPA FL 33602 - 5708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2068 CLERMONT FL 34714 - 9262 GREENBERG, ROBYN B GRIECO, DANIEL J II GRUBER, CRAIG M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 804 GRIECO DIANE Y 10 PAPAYA ST APT 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 521 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1700 HAIST, SCOTT J HALE, CAROLYN SMITH HALL, ROGER W HAIST, MELISSA KAY FIELDS, ELIZABETH SMITH HALL, SYLVIA M 3659 JUSTIN DR 1107 CONCORD ST 521 MANDALAY AVE # 803 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3603 CHATTANOOGA TN 37405 - 3101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 HALLERAN, EDWARD M HALLERAN, EDWARD M HANNA, ASHRAF F SIKA, STEPHEN SIKA, STEPHEN HANNA, MIRANDA Z 1005 VICTORIA DR 11 SAN MARCO ST # 303 3509 SHORELINE CIR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5749 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 HANNA, VICTORIA HARMON, THOMAS S JR HARTMAN, DOLORES M THE HANNA, ATIF HARMON, DEANNE L UTA 3-30-82 29W 471 SUNSET RIDGE RD 3321 W SEVILLA AVE 1850 SAN MATEO DR BARTLETT IL 60103 - 2047 TAMPA FL 33629 - DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3719 HARTMAN, JEFFREY E HAYDON, CHARLES R HAYNES, ALVIN S HARTMAN, MARISA A 1601 DRUID RD E HAYNES, BITA P 5 CORD GRASS LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4512 501 MANDALAY AVE # 401 OLD LYME CT 06371 - 2080 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 HEIDI INVESTMENT TRUST HEILMAN FAMILY LTD PTNSHP HEILMANS RESTAURANTS INC BENJAMIN BUILDERS REALTY 941 BAY ESPLANADE 447 MANDALAY AVE TRUST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2013 69 MASS AVE LUNENBERG MA 01462 - 1212 HILDEBRANDT, MARK THE HILL, ANNE M THE HIND, GRAHAM R M 33 OLD LAKE RD 2510 S DUNDEE ST SILVER LODGE TWENTYPENCE RD HAWTHORN WOODS IL 60047 - 8018 TAMPA FL 33629 - 6411 WILBURTON ELY CAMBRIDGESHIRE CB63RN 00009 - UNITED KINGDOM HOERNIG, LAURA HOERNIG, OTTO W HORVATH, KLARA 337 RIVER BEND RD HOERNIG, JUANITA S ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III GREAT FALLS VA 22066 - 4138 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1201 11 SAN MARCO ST # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 0 HULLING, DON C HULLING, TRICE D 14008 SHADY SHORES DR TAMPA FL 33613 - 1931 HYC,PETER HYC,ANDY 505 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1716 IVERSON, DONALD D 1001 SAN MARCO ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - J E C FUNDING INC PO BOX 4689 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4689 JACOBSEN, GLENN C JACOBSEN, BARBARA D 6 FERRAND WOODS SAINT LOUIS MO 63124 - JOPPERT, MARCOS SNODGRASS, SUSAN M 5010 W THE RIVIERA ST TAMPA FL 33609 - 3613 HUNTER HOTEL CO PO BOX 7230 DES MOINES IA 50309 - 7230 HYDUK,RANDY HYDUK, APRIL 20539 COUNTRYSIDE DR MACOMB MI 48044 - 3589 IYER, VENKIT S IYER, LAKSHMI V 3469 SHORELINE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 J M C FAMILY INVESTMENTS LTD 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 JENNINGS, MARK K JENNINGS, VICKI B 8471 FLOWERING CHERRY LN 1244 LAUREL MD 20723 - 1010 KAHLER, PERRY E KAHLER, VICKI LEE 8927 MAGNOLIA CHASE CIR TAMPA FL 33647 - 2220 KAROUNOS, THEODORE P KAROUNOS, LORRAINE J 444 PINE HILL RD LEONIA NJ 07605 - 1420 JOYCE, JILL E 521 MANDALAY AVE # 602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 KAHRS, CAROLYN J KAHRS, HENRY G 4834 QUILL CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3699 KARTES, BOB KARTES, MARIA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA KELLY, THOMAS L THE 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite KELLY, KATHLEEN F THE 404 11 SAN MARCO ST # 401 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 WURLEY, G JOHN HURLEY, MAUREEN JOYCE 22 FOXTAIL CIR CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE CO 80113 - 4125 ISHAK, REDA H BISHAY, MANAR 12 PINEWOOD HILLS LONGMEADOW MA 01106 - 1663 J & M PROP APOLLO BEACH 907 BUNKER VIEW DR APOLLO BEACH FL 33572 - 2813 J N E BEACH CONDOS LLC 6326 MACLAURIN DR TAMPA FL 33647 - 1163 JOHNSON 2003 LIV TRUST JOHNSON, GEORGE A THE 10 PAPAYA ST # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 KAESTNER, JOHN T KAESTNER, JOANN M 777 CARMAN MEADOWS DR BALLWIN MO 63021 - 7174 KAIZER, JEFFREY R KAIZER, LISA B 3303 LEGAL CREST DR LONGWOOD FL 32779 - KEIR, LEONARD KEIR, BERNTRUD 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1605 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2076 KER, G CAMERON KER, LISA A 2426 BUTTERNUT CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2252 KIEFFER, ALAN L KLABISCH, MATTHEW M KLEINBERG, MILTON M KIEFFER, NELLI L KLABISCH, SUSAN M KLEINBERG, MARSHA A 521 MANDALAY AVE # 501 11348 CEDARWOOD CT 6034 COUNTRY CLUB OAKS PL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 FRANKFORT IL 60423 - 7854 OMAHA NE 68152 - 2009 KNOWLTON, JOHN P THE KNUTSON, WILLIAM R II KOCH, MYRON KNOWLTON, CATHIE L THE KNUTSON, CAROLE M KOCH, ELIZABETH W180 N8217 DESTINY DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 802 501 MANDALAY AVE # 810 MENOMONEE FALLS WI 53051 - 3503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 KOENIG, NORBERT KOKOMO PROPERTIES LLC KOPANAKIS, WILLIAM A KOENIG, BRUNHILDE 657 SOUNDVIEW DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 402 44 EILEEN AVE PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 4246 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 PLAINVIEW NY 11803 - 5203 KOSENE, STACY KOTCHMAN, CASEY J THE KOVACS, ALEX G 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1102 8442 125TH CT KOVACS, SANDEE G CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 3200 323 6TH AVE N INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 2549 KOVACS, VIOLET K KOZMINSKI, JACEK KROLL, WOLFGANG 23 ROCKAWAY ST KOZMINSKI, GRAZYNA KROLL, LILLI CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1739 4758 S PULASKI RD 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 CHICAGO IL 60632 - 4114 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 KULKARNI, VINEET KUNIS, SABINA L B J LLC NAGALE, VISHWANATH KUNIS, NAUM 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD 3426 DORAL DR 501 MANDALAY AVE # 801 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 WATERLOO IA 50701 - 4628 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1712 LA BELLE ELECTRIC INC LA SAL MOTEL CONDO ASSN LAMBRINIDES FAMILY IRREV TRUST 24546 21.MILE RD PO BOX 1054 2175 VALLEY VIEW DR MACOMB MI 48042 - 5111 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 1054 ROCKY RIVER OH 44116 - 2860 LATCH TRUST LEBRON, GEORGE LEE, PAUL J 43 CLOUD VIEW RD LEBRON, SONIA DUDZIAK LEE, AGNES S SAUSALITO CA 94965 - 2006 506 TAMARACK DR 9715 STONECLIFF CT BARTLETT IL 60103 - 1515 CLARENCE NY 14031 - 2439 LEVINE, RICHARD LEVY, MARK S LIEBERMAN, LAWRENCE T LEVINE, BARBARA LEVY, DEBORAH T LIEBERMAN, DEBORAH S 5047 OTIS AVE 10005 RADELIFFE DR 10 WILLOWOOD LN TARZANA CA 91356 - 4207 TAMPA FL 33626 - 2511 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 2058 LOCKETT, THERESA LOWE, JEFF LOWRY, RICHARD M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1003 LOWE, KATHY LOWRY, ALEXIS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 700 DEER VUE LN 1648 RIPARIAN DR FENTON MO 63026 - 3562 NAPERVILLE IL 60565 - 4173 LYLE, JOHN F M B C PROPERTIES II LLC MACK, DAVID A REVOCABLE TRUST LYLE, NANCY S MACK, DAVID A THE PMB 247 4500 NORTHWOODS LN 30 JELLIFF LN 8905 KINGSTON PIKE # 12 BLOOMINGTON IN 47404 - 9420 SOUTHPORT CT 06890 - 1482 KNOXVILLE TN 37923 - 5021 L_J MACRE, DANIEL M MAGRATH, JAMES P MACRE, ANNETTE MAGRATH, CAROL A 505 MANDALAY AVE # 75 2 PRITCHARD LN CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1718 WESTPORT CT 06880 - 5633 MAJEWSKI, DENISE M THE MALACHOWSKI, JERRY SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINE J MALACHOWSKI, DOROTHY 43 LAKE ADALYN DR S 1426 SEMAR CT SOUTH BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 9542 MOUNT PROSPECT IL 60056 - 2984 MANDALAY BEACH CLUB CONDO ASSN MANDALAY BEACH CLUB LTD 2201 4TH ST N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 MANION, JOSEPH M MANION, JANINE M 10118 BENNINGTON DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2406 MARRULLIER, ALAN H 501 MANDALAY AVE # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 MC CARTHY, EUGENE REV TRUST 2505 ENTERPRISE RD CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1100 MC DERMOTT, JAMES T DRAPP, SHANNON M 521 MANDALAY DR # 904 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 MEEHAN, THOMAS P 521 MANDALAY AVE # 810 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 MIHOLICS, JOHN C MIHOLICS, MARIA T 18 WINGATE PL YONKERS NY 10705 - MANDALAY BUILDING PARTNERSHIP 499 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2045 MARCO, SAN TRUST CHASE, WALTER W BEN 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 MARY G REALTY INC NICK GIONIS 490 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2007 MC CULLOUGH, JACKIE E 744 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1411 MC LAY, DAVID THE PO BOX 7153 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 7153 MENKE DEV 1053 ST GREGORY ST CINCINNATI OH 45202 - 1733 MIKHAIL, MAGUED MARZOUK, CHRISTIANE 591 BELTED KINGFISHER DR N 1533 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 6149 16 MAGUIRE, PAUL J PO BOX 2925 SAN RAMON CA 94583 - 7925 MANDALAY 802 PO BOX 120 BLOOMINGDALE IL 60108 - 0120 MANDALAY LAND TRUST 3711 SWANN AVE TAMPA FL 33609 - 4521 MAROTTOLI, ANTHONY 10 PAPAYA ST # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 MAZAS LAND TRUST MAZAS, BILL W THE 1600 GULF BLVD # 7117 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 MC DERMOTT, JAMES T DRAPP, SHANNON M 501 MANDALAY AVE # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 MC SWIGGIN, JAMES MC SWIGGINS, CHERYL A 12 SAXONY ST CLIFTON PARK NY 12065 - 1655 MESTAS, DONALD M JR MESTAS, CAROL S 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 MILLINGTON, CHARLES J MILLINGTON, JULIA B 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1006 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 MINA, GEORGE I MOHR, GREGORY A MOLLER, ANDREW K MINA, AMAL A MOHR, KATHLEEN L 12175 OXBOW DR 4783 EDGE PARK DR 2873 ROEHAMPTON CLOSE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 - 4261 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 4845 TARPON SPGS FL 34688 - 8426 MOMESSO, NOELLA MO_ MESSO, SERGIO 10 JONQUILLE KIRKLAND QC H9H 3C4 CANADA MOMESSO, NORELLA N 10 JONQUILLE KIRKLAND QC H9H 5A3 00030 - 00030- CANADA MOULIS, JAMES M MOULIS, SUSAN B 3302 ROCKY BEACH RD MC HENRY IL 60051 - 9669 NAGALE, VISHWANATH T NAGALE, PUSHPAMALA V 521 MANDALAY AVE # 508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 NOLL, STEPHEN A NOLL, DEBORAH V 501 MANDALAY AVE # 701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1711 NOVOGRATZ, JOSEPH 7667 EQUITABLE DR EDEN PRARIE MN 55344 - 3696 OLIVER, ROBERT OLIVER, CHARLOTTE B 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 P S B CREDIT SERV INC PO BOX 38 PRINSBURG MN 56281 - 0038 PAPAYA TRUST 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 PARAMOUNT LLC 1803 BRIAR CREEK BLVD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4696 MUDD, JAMES A MUDD, CECELIA K 6919 CHANCELLOR DR CEDAR FALLS IA 50613 - 6956 NEAL, RALPH C NEAL, JULIE A 4622 OSAGE CT GREENBAY WI 54313 - 9531 NORUS, KEVIN 11816 MARBLEHEAD DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2553 O'HANLEN, PETER O'HANLEN, TERRIE 10 PAPAYA ST #1102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 ORISSA PROPERTIES LTD 31 BROAD ST ST HELIER JERSEY JE4 CXW 00000 CHANNEL ISLANDS P S B CREDIT SERVICES INC 508 3RD ST PRINSBURG MN 56281 - 3700 PAPPAS, PETER C 225 ROBINSON ST # 540 ORLANDO FL 32801 - 4321 PAULL, DENNIS M PAULL, DIANE P 10104 RADCLIFFE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2512 0 MORRIS, MICHELLE V 29 GAYLORD GLEN WATERBURY CT 06708 - 2100 MURRAY, SUSAN L 902 ANCHORAGE RD TAMPA FL 33602 - 5754 NEUWOLF PARTNERS 2100 CLEARWATER DR OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1927 NOVICKY, STEVEN D NOVICKY, KIMBERLY M 5850 DEER SPRING RUN CANFIELD OH 44406 - 7613 OLIVER, BRIAN C OLIVER, JEANINE H 3739 MULLENHURST DR PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3661 P K & J KINC 5020 CENTRAL AVE ST PETERSBURG FL 33707 - 1942 PACK, JAMES D PACK, MARY B 30146 E TOPAZ DR SCOTTSDALE AZ 85258 - PARADES, ANTONIO M 10 PAPAYA ST # 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2055 PECORARO, ERNEST A PECORARO, NYDIA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 112 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2066 PENN COMMONS LP PERNICE, SALVATORE J PERRY, GREGORY G 871 BEAVER DR PERNICE, BARBARA F LAHN, MONICA L DUBOIS PA 15801 - 2511 3 N 614 CENTRAL CT 1574 SHINING ORE DR ADDISON IL 60101 - 3052 BRENTWOOD TN 37027 - 2218 PERTILE, RICHARD K PERTILE, DEBORAH J 1137 MARINA DR TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - 6713 PFAFF, ROBERT PFAFF, BETTY 521 MANDALAY AVE # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 PLANES, REGINA M 32700 US HIGHWAY 19 N PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 3119 POMS, ALAN M 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1007 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 E SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 RECEVEUR, RONALD L 6012 REGAL SPRINGS DR LOUISVILLE KY 40205 - 3319 REISS, KENNETH P 11 SAN MARCO ST # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 RIGBY, GREGORY S RIGBY, CAROLE J 124 OWASCO ST AUBURN NY 13021 - 4114 ROSCOE, GREGORY J ROSCOE, LINDA L PO BOX 308 DUBOIS PA 15801 - 0308 • PETERS, MICHAEL L PETERS, STEPHANIE S 22 CLYDE GRUVER RD BINGHAMTON NY 13901 - 6022 PILATO, SAM A PILATO, TALMA 3257 NICKS PL CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2017 PLANES, REGINA 854 CYPRESS LAKEVIEW CT TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 7307 POOLE, WILLIAM L III ROBINSON, JOHN CONNIE JR 3 HUNTERS CROSSING CT THE WOODLANDS TX 77381 - 4757 RAGHAVAN,CHAKRAVARTHY RAGHAVAN,VASANTHY 8918 SOUTHERN BREEZE DR ORLANDO FL 32836 - 5012 REHKEMPER, PHILIP A REHKEMPER, BARBARA A 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1797 RENDEL, JEROLD S TRUST 660 SNUG ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1829 ROBULAK, KENNETH J ROBULAK, PATRICIA J 521 MANDALAY AVE # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 ROSSDALE MGMT INC 120 LANSDOWNE RD S OTTAWA ON K1 M ON4 00030 - CANADA PETH, NICK A PO BOX 580 WAYNESVILLE OH 45068 - 0580 PITTMAN, C CHRISTOPHER PITTMAN, KAREN G 1099 SHIPWATCH CIR TAMPA FL 33602 - 5736 PODGURSKI, MICHAEL A PODGURSKI, LINDA G 1125 W POWDERHORN RD MACHANICSBURG PA 17050 - 2007 POTTER, PASCHOALENA 463 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2033 RAMOS, JAMES A RAMOS, CONNIE R 501 MANDALAY AVE # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1707 REINHARDT, MARK REINHARDT, CONNIE K N3080 MEADE ST APPLETON WI 54913 - 9571 RESIDENCES AT SANDPEARL RESORT 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 RODWELL, ERIC V RODWELL, DONNA M 11 SAN MARCO ST # 408 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 ROTH, ELIZABETH W 8826 NAUTILUS DR TAMPA FL 33635 - 1339 ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III ROWLAND, CLARENCE E III ROWLAND, CLARENCE E 2112 WATERS AVE HORVATH, KLARA HORVATH, KLARA TAMPA FL 33604 - 2748 11 SAN MARCO ST # 602 11 SAN MARCO ST # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 RUKAVINA, JAMES RUKAVINA, DIANNE BOX 6448 EDSON AB T7E 1T8 CANADA • SAID, NADER SAID, HALA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1007 00030- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 SAMEE, AHMED B 1182 PINE RIDGE CIR # E3 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 6423 SAND KEY CONSULTING LLC BOBAK, WLADYSLAW 180 DINAH RD MEDINAH IL 60157 - SCHECHTER, JANIS ILENE REVOCAB 12103 MARBLEHEAD DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2505 SHEPPARD, KERILYN SHEPPARD, KRISTIN 328 SIX MILE RD WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - 9565 SMITH, DONALD F THE SMITH, MARY H THE 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 SOBEL, KATHY 11 SAN MARCO ST # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 SPARKS, SUSAN M 11 SANMARCO ST N # 1105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 STENBERG, ANDREW 10 PAPAYA ST # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 SAMPSON, THOMAS A SAMPSON, CAROLYN L 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 SANDOZ, DAVID C SANDOZ, ANN L 523 N OKLAHOMA AVE MORTON IL 61550 - 2373 SERAG, SHERIF LEWIS-SERAG, MAHA 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2075 SHIVERS, EDWARD T SHIVERS, HAZEL E 10 PAPAYA ST # 505 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2040 SMITH, MERLE W SMITH, DIANA T 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2069 SOBOTKA, JOSEPH J SOBOTKA, SYLVIA R 52 THOROUGHBRED DR HOLLAND PA 18966 - 2570 ST JOHN, DENNIS THE ST JOHN, VALERIE 342 E JERICHO TPKE MINCOLA NY 11501 - 2111 STEPHANS,SUSAN STEPHANS, DORIS 803 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3004 SALTZMAN, MURRAY SALTZMAN, BARBARA 1170 GULF BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2780 SAND KEY CONSULTING LLC 1015 NORTH RIVER WALK E CHICAGO IL 60610 - 7398 SCHAEFER, RANDY THE 3225 S MACDILL AVE # 268 TAMPA FL 33629 - 8171 SHEAR, MARILYN F 2650 MCCORMICK DR STE 130 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1062 SIINO, WILLIAM J SIINO, MICHAEL T 13519 FALCON POINTE DR ORLANDO FL 32837 - 5327 SNYDER, CLIFFORD D SNYDER, MARYLIN V 1650 WACHTLER AVE SAINT PAUL MN 551 18 - 3745 SOTEREANOS, STELLA SOTEREANOS,STACEY 307 S DITHRIDGE # 808 PITTSBURGH PA 15213 - 3519 STANISLAWEK, DANIEL STANISLAWEK, GRETA 501 MANDALAY AVE # 309 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1707 STOJAK, JAMES L STOJAK, ROBIN L 3964 MULLENHURST DR PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3665 SUCHARSKI, FRANK J SWIDEREK, TIMOTHY J TADROS, HANI S SUCHARSKI, CATHERINE J SWIDEREK, JOSEPH A YASSAOUI, SUZANNE 248 AMERICAN DR 4540 WEATHERVANE DR 2184 LAURENCE DR RICHBORO PA 18954 - 1141 ALPHARETTE GA 30022 - 3759 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6466 TANKEL, ROBERT L TANKEL, TERRI G 1022 MAIN ST # D DI)NEDIN FL 34698 - 5237 TEMAINVESTMENTS 3135 SW 3RD AVE MIAMI FL 33129 - 2711 THWAITE, EDWARD THWAITE, PATRICIA 15 LOOKOUT POINT TRL TOTOWA NJ 07512 - 1611 TSANGARIS, WILMA B TSANGARIS, NICHOLAS 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2076 VISOSO, ROBERTO VISOSO, GRACIELA 521 MANDALAY AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 WANDACHOWICZ, BOGDAN 10 PAPAYA ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2055 WEBER, JED P WEBER, JILL E 505 MANDALAY AVE N # 42 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1717 WILSON, CHRISTINE DEFERRARI WILSON, MARK A 136 HARBOR DR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5403 YOFAN, ABRAHAM REAL ESTATE TRU YOFAN, AVI THE 10 PAPAYA ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 • TAYLOR, DAVID R 46 TEJEDA, RAFAEL E WALTERS, JAMES TEJEDA, IDELFIA A 11 SAN MARCO ST # 1004 3516 WOODRIDGE PL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2062 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 2434 THOMAS-KIRSCHKE, HEIDI 525 MANDALAY AVE # 24 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1798 THWAITE, EDWARD W THWAITE, PATRICIA A 15 LOOK OUT POINTE TRL TOTOWA NJ 07512 - TOUCHTON,JOANN TOUCHTON, WALTER W 10 PAPAYA ST # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 TURLEY, STEWART TURLEY, LINDA A 10 PAPAYA ST # 1504 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2057 VITOLA, JOHN R VITOLA, GEORGINE A 218 S BROAD ST BROOKSVILLE FL 34601 - 2832 WARD, MICHAEL S WARD, GISELLE V 407 S ROYAL PALM WAY TAMPA FL 33609 - 3728 WELLS, DARCY L NALEY, STEVE W 705 BAY ESPLANADE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 YEAROUT, JANE R YEAROUT, JANET A 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 YOFAN, AVI YOFAN, JACKIE 10 PAPAYA ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 TOUCHTON, WALTER W THE TOUCHTON, JO ANN H THE 10 PAPAYA ST # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 URINO, FRANK N & NATALIE TRUST 1627 MIDNIGHT PASS WAY CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1821 W J C C IRREVOCABLE RESIDENCE 10 PAPAYA ST # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2054 WARSTLER FAMILY TRUST WARSTLER, ARTHUR K THE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 WILLIAMS, BERNABE REVOCABLE TR WILLIAMS, BERNABE THE 1204 SUNCAST LN STE 2 ELDORADO HILLS CA 95762 - 9665 YEAROUT, JANE YEAROUT, JAMES 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 YOFAN, AVI YOFAN, JACQUELINE 10 PAPAYA ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2056 YOFAN, AVI YOURTH, BRADLEY) ZAKHARY, ATEF S YOFAN, JACQUELINE YOURTH, VALERIE R 11 SAN MARCO ST # 603 521 MANDALAY AVE # 607 501 MANDALAY AVE # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1708 ZAMANI, SAM S FEIZIPOUR, MAHVASH 197 LOGAN MANOR DR RESTON VA 20190 - 3276 • ZILISCH, BARBARA L THE 11 SAN MARCO ST # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2061 Check list for CDB Agenda & Application sent to City Clerks Office FLD2006-02009 490 Mandalay Avenue INITIALS Application Form Parcel ID Letter of Authorization Survey or Legal Description Copy of 400 scale Zoning Atlas with property outlined and 500' radius hand drawn from outside perimter of site t? 2 x 2 Map s required for ANX, LUZ & Z LARGE SCALE AMENDMENTS Sherry Watkins 171 C N O Oi 0 N O N M r"I 0 3 v, n N 1?/1 0 C Em C N A 'A- S 1 to v a 7d" 2586 Bid 14t CITY OF CLEARWATER SWC AND V C • sae ae, mo-w+ - QCl I /f. INITY PINELLA5 COUNTY. FLORIDA - ' a V CLEARWATER too BEACH - - - PREPARED BY e PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION RE3UB fail $ ®I Q ? W N i g 9/e-a ?O 100 & Nyrtle A e' Cleo rwoter, 11 3713E Pn (721)56 41 ? < ? .: 2- 50, Fos; (121)526-4155 O? s [ - blip://Www.9l+arwpler-R.eon/Clty_D+pa,lmenlf/puallr_x0eks/engineer/ ol l , " °p BELLE HARB 122 5 15 ra mrr: a S 9AYMONT v Public Information dot, li lumish,d by tee City of cleorwol er Public Works Adminl9tral ton/Engtheerin led and must be tice 30 N $ ;' $ ? so STREET ?Qw a° 00 $ g, l and used by the recipient will the underetonding that the data received wa+ cdl,cled for th ur f d i i a ] y a b . + I ?° CORAL ereiop e p pose o nq a graph c 11 rartn,awre F-entory. A, such, the city of cl,m,le, PWA/E ' d I A s I y , r ?aJ MOTEL, CONS make, no warranties, expensed a, Impll,d, c neerninq the occurac y. completeness, reliability, or suitability of this data for I + s' ? b l +a as ] as i 9 ll..?r i 42-114 any/E rr Dort use. Pur thermos es Lof Clearwater sr PWA assume, s no no II°bility wnolsoever associated wlin Ins u i r s 22Y01a S? r °? • e ?ys SUN or m suse o such dot,. b is ]+ ' < +?ro HARBOR This Altos e i a b t t i di g ? ° H e CONDO p g s su jec o per o c Changes. Cm informotion boat l t t v?yo E ?. + ?,I ti +[Yt 76-90 a es r ., o please call PWA/E or alit am Website. SAN 10 ) R ' ' ?13 J CO S1, A n ' n » ?se 41 ? .r + + ° N ' a I n a 9 le ,a ?/r ?/a • O ANDALAY ,°, i q?eo eIa + CH n ?ee » ? r EE CL " ?e ?s] ' I's 21 ?ar 0 too 200 400 600 122-1 ?e 11' a ? men ddiiiii? +s ? eo of „ ,+ ' ??e r SCALE: t" - 400' + R PAPAYA 51 -1 r ?10 ua STREET $ ]091_]6 9] :,, r , ?Ir ' LEGEND: P ?a 1 a n I]a ? • ] IJI Ira E ? ?^ ?l < ?rs , .. ?s 1 O BLOCK NUMBER » ? ?n , , N f ?rr Io °1 + ? ?1p s 1234 LOT ADDRESS • ? r u T ; ? CITY LIMITS LINE ---- u ? aar r , :.. s:n-]r]e ? .oi a ]r- >• ?oI iia + s -- r.,:..1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY E"'?'?') OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS V ml , m eDo 23/01 .0 ss ' ?0 to _ A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX X11 ae a r) „ m ?a a 101 O m» s? , r a u R ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY ?J W J as » 92 D i0 ?o ?01 ?• ,•mo do MDR ZONING DESIGNATION $ )99 M, C , ? 4 m 792-301 I a 7 r $llel, 0 ZONE LINE 9]T-11!] - '\/ ? -aIN0WA1 R't(PLWC 0 a 9 AVegwiY Kw $a c " r ' a s a r 13 12 n ' l' o 1 -pTV wPEO so Pil $ e 8 REZONE MO p ep d 1 l ? ? g ? F ^ 7 Z E 9911 to/13/Oi z P WATER LOT 1 C U MBIA 4:> $ D .& 1)]e-109 S B, 23-60 a. n_es 61)61 s 5 ° EAi+t Channel REVISED: ? cvLPwEw eLw to28-B2 09/09/2002 - - - a0.) A 1 OOr LOT 7 32 - - - ZONING ATLAS 2 32/03 ^? °' 32/02 y 276A NW 1/4 OF SECTION 1 267A 276B A 8- 29 S- 15 E 40 0 0 FLD2006-02009 490 MANDALAY AVE Date Received: 02/24/2006 GIONIS CONDO'S ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 267A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLWCoverSheet i 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 11:14 AM To: Sullivan, Patricia Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Handouts at 9.19.06 CDB meeting re 490 Mandalay Avenue Pat - I understand that you are on vacation right now and will return early October. At the Community Development Board (CDB) meeting on September 19th, Ed Armstrong and Ethel Hammer passed out handouts and Jerry Figurski et al passed out handouts or submitted into exhibits information for the case at 490 Mandalay Avenue. Could you send me a copy of all of that information that was passed out at the meeting, so that I can place it in my case file. I have also asked Leslie Dougall-Sides if she kept the bound handout that Ethel Hammer passed out and, if so, could she forward it to me for our case file, in lieu of you making a copy of it for me. Thanks. Wayne qZ) G -??. C? B polo 1?C LUCE 911 q) 0 L Consistency Analysis - Flexible Development Standards Gionis By The Sea Location: Southwest corner of North Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, City of Clearwater Project: 12 residential units and street plaza City of Clearwater Flexible Development Standards - Attached Dwellings B. Attached dwellings. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Consistent: YES Explanation: Not Applicable. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; Consistent: YES Explanation: Access to the subject site is proposed on Baymont Street. An existing driveway located on North Mandalay Avenue will be eliminated improving traffic conditions and eliminating a point of conflict with pedestrians on Mandalay. 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building; Consistent: YES The increase in height from 30 feet to 82.5 feet will allow for the proposed 12 residential units to be designed so that all the units will have views of the beach and the gulf via the view corridor down Baymont Street. In addition, the building footprint is setback off of the western property boundary to gain some separation and provide some air and light between the subject project and the large scale 150 foot tall mixed use residential project currently being developed within 5 feet of the subject site's western property line. The result is an improved site plan that creates a viable residential project. In addition, the design is consistent with the Beach by Design architectural design guidelines - resulting in an improved physical appearance. P.O. BOX 18282 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33679-8282. 813.870.349A (O) • 813.767.5763 (C) • STEVE a,LUCEPLANNINO.COM LUE PLANNING Gl?Ot?? • f The increase in height is also associated with the provision of parking below the residential units, which also enhances the overall appearance of the project. 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; Consistent: YES Explanation: First, to clarify the proposed building meets all of the zoning district setback requirements. It is only the associated ancillary structures: solid waste pad and screening, water fountain, pergolas and plaza related furniture that do not meet the district setback standards. The reduction in the front yard setback along Baymont Street is associated with the solid waste pad and screening wall. This location is dictated by the City of Clearwater, is functional and allows for the efficient collection of solid waste. The reduction in the front yard setback along North Mandalay Avenue is associated with the ancillary structures provided within the proposed plaza area. The proposed residential building is to be setback 15 to 20 feet from the property line. Within this area pedestrian amenities are proposed such as: tables, chairs, pergolas and trees for shade, a fountain, a small stage area, trash receptacles, information board, and potentially an area set aside for street vendors. The reduction in the front yard setbacks will contribute to a more active and dynamic street life. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 2 Consistent: YES Explanation: Not Applicable However, the site is designed to accommodate the required parking beneath the building, screened from view. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. Consistent: YES Explanation: The building is meeting the architectural guideline which calls for - where a building dimension exceeds 100 feet that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The building height is 82.5 feet. The building width along North Mandalay Avenue is approximately 140 feet. The width along Baymont Street is approximately 65 feet. The building is meeting the guideline which calls for building planes that continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet - that the building wall be offset by a distance of at least 5 feet. The building plane is offset by at least 7 feet - thus meeting this guideline. The building should have at least 60% coverage with windows and architectural decoration on any elevation (visible from a point outside the parcel). This requirement is being met through the provision of windows and architectural decoration covering more than 60% of the elevations that qualify. The building is meeting the architectural guideline which calls for no more than 60% of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet. The building envelope above 45 feet is less than 50%. Furthermore, it should be added that the project proposes to incorporate a plaza along North Mandalay Avenue which will vary in depth from 15 to 20 feet. Within this plaza, as described above, it will include numerous pedestrian amenities. This space will be designed and constructed in a manner entirely consistent with the streetscape design guidelines discussed in the Beach by Design document. Prepared By: Steve Luce, AICP President, Luce Planning Group, Inc. Prepared For: Gionis By The Sea, City of Clearwater Date: September 18, 2006 3 • • GIONOS PROJECT ANALYSIS BEACH BY DESIGN/LDC STANDARDS FOR REVIEW City of Clearwater, Florida Community Development Board Public Hearing September 19, 2006 Prepared by Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. 3001 N. Rocky Point Drive East, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33607 CPS w. 1 llglnto ORIGINAL RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER C] BEACH BY DESIGN M,ANDALAY AVENUE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS Beach by Design Background The purpose of Beach by Design is to implement the recommendations of the Clearwater Beach Strategies for Revitalization Plan. Beach by Design establishes design guidelines which implement the revitalization strategies. Beach by Design also defines eight (8) specific geographic areas on Clearwater Beach relative to the revitalization strategies. The Mandalay Avenue area contains two districts: Destination Resort, and Retail and Restaurant. The Destination Resort District is characterized as the area between the Clearwater Beach Hotel and the Hilton along the west side of Mandalay Avenue. The Destination Resort Ustrict represents a unique opportunity for quality beachfront redevelopment which would serve as a catalyst for the revitalization and redevelopment of Clearwater I Beach to the north of the Pier 60 Park. This area represents opportunity for additional l high-rise, mixed use hotel development. The revitalization effort calls for a concentrated three-block strip of upscale beachfront hotels. This critical mass of development is 1 necessary to support the redevelopment of Mandalay as a "Main Street Retail Street" and to generate and support a diversity of up-scale restaurants, clubs and other forms of entertainment in short supply on the Beach. A key element of any successful resort destination area is a vital retail and restaurant district. The Retail and Restaurant District is located along the east side of Mandalay Avenue. Mandalay Avenue: Destination Resort, and Retail and Restaurant Districts Development and Design Characteristics The proposed Gionos project is located at the southwest corner of Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, which is within the Destination Resort District, as designated in Beach by Design. Along the east side of Mandalay Avenue is the Retail and Restaurant District. The character of development along Mandalay Avenue within the Destination Resort, and Retail and Restaurant Districts is comprised of retail and restaurant uses along the Mandalay Avenue frontage. Much of the development along Mandalay Avenue exhibits strong architectural detailing and fenestration with pedestrian scale architectural features, as well as providing retail and/or restaurant uses along the street (Exhibit A). The scale of development of both existing and approved projects along the Mandalay Avenue street frontage is comprised of buildings that are one to two stories in height, with the exception of the Hilton (Exhibit B). This height pattern transitions to taller structures set back from the street frontage. The one exception is the Hilton, which was approved prior to the adoption of Beach by Design (Exhibit C). Engelhardt, Hammer ? ?kssocoates, Inc. 2 • • New and recently approved projects along Mandalay Avenue reinforce the existing context by setting a high standard of creating a strong continuous street frontage, providing decorative facades (large windows, varied roof designs, canopies), providing pedestrian-oriented uses, encouraging large street setbacks for tall structures, creating tower designs that terrace and/or taper building heights and exhibiting high quality architectural designs and detailing (Exhibit D). Of particular note is the strong facade design relief created by deep wall plane recesses, variations in wall plane breaks and facade heights, curved wall surfaces and/or significant design features such as projecting balconies, and transparency of the facade created by windows and open balconies. As will be demonstrated by this analysis, the Gionos project is not compatible with the Destination Resort, or Retail and Restaurant Districts, and therefore, does not meet the general or flexible design criteria (Exhibit D). ORIGINAL. RECEIVED SEP 2 6 2006 _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, MG. 3 • EXHIBIT A Overview Mandalay Avenue Street Frontage Development and Design Character #1: View looking north at east side of Mandalay from Hilton 4 y k. 1. 1 q 9 4Y,? ` " ? s+ tF rw ? ? d ? ? .9 t} r4A Yy. x> ;u k d' 9(§ J ? #5: Retail view in front of Mandalay Beach Club. z IN s ? q r ?s S `;4 h?s'r #2: View looking south at east side Mandalay From Hilton. i ^ 'y wb , #4: Retail view looking south at west side of Mandalay from San Marco. Fi)gelharO. F-iarryrrwF & Associates, lric- #3: View of Hilton retail. #6: Retail view looking north from San Marco. 0 0 EXHIBIT A Mandalay Avenue Street Frontage Development and Design Character y #1: View looking north at east side of Mandalay from Hilton. EXHIBIT A Mandalay Avenue Street Frontage Development and Design Character weir 5 Y L fi 4 Yxi .e 124, ..,d^? d ?. 31Y 41'? #2: View looking south at east side Mandalay from Hilton. gy4 s Alz- J y w ? r Engelhardt, Hammer 4 AsSoc ates, Inc.. - -- 6 0 • EXHIBIT A Mandalay Avenue Street Frontage Development and Design Character " Y f v? ,E' rS )M ? ?r Mt ) p?'. y . ?'b aNe?? Y ?a4 ab4 '? y h t' £ N r g 4 ? ? V-1 I 0 q?- aap; ?a ?: t ?+) ki x'a 61 - FyA F P _.. .., raN ': #3: View of Hilton retail. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Sit' 2 6 2006 PLANNING DA CITY OF LEARWAER Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, floe. T • 9 EXHIBIT A Mandalay Avenue Street Frontage Development and Design Character v w 3 C ? { 4 f } Ya. F e y> v` N^f Aw 3 x . Y s Ya d y T `t r ? l µ f a g2 4 s? ? F 1f Lfi'? 3 ?? vn • • EXHIBIT A Mandalay Avenue Street Frontage Development and Design Character 'ti r ? ? y '' ?#s. f 1 2 04 ???: ti A $4 14 f ik «a § - # G {? \ _. ••, tc bgf dam' ? r? r* C-. K A? k ?? d6. ?9 G*f F+ @'- Kam.:; :+ ,'-•?r v7z #5: Retail view in front of Mandalay Beach Club. d31VMZlV310 d0 ALIO LN3VYldVd3a ONINNHId 900Z Z ? d3S x3AI30321 1bN19R1O r?gelhai di, Hammer & Associates, Inc. 9 • EXHIBIT A Mandalay Avenue Street Frontage Development and Design Character #6: Retail view looking north from San Marco. • • EXHIBIT B Retail/Restaurant Frontage Along Mandalay Avenue ORIGIN& RECEIVED SEE 2 7 26`76 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER to W W ? Q i a W w CLt Q _ m t9 i' , .' O Q ?CL. Z C U? Z } U 410 i Legend Gionos Property Building Use Retail/Restaurant Residential 1 Ci f / . 1 , Q /,O APp YA sT. . k 4 I tN. ° it's Lij 'T' Qr' 9rX J ?• f Ce Q IL ` - tom.. oA7a W to Exhibit B Retail/Restaurant Frontage Along Mandalay Avenue () ----I 0 100 200 Feet ENGELHARDT, HAMMER & ASSOCIATES Planning . Engineering . Landscape Architecture 3001 North Rocky Point Drive East, Suite300, Tampa, FL 33607 Telephone: 813 282-3855, Fax: 813 286 2308 nivmdv313 3o ulo .1N31Nlddd3a 9NINNVId 900Z 4 Z d3S a3A13338 T01191do EXHIBIT C Building Height Patterns ? ? ??? _. ? ._dRnJ ',.. ?MAG96,NItlW9!?Y?Aipml •Allla.RT?_e"" I: Engrelhardi, Harm-ie?r & 'Associates, Inc. 0 12 • n O Z m ? 0 v M ?? D C= v 9 m C" Z EXHIBIT D Overview New and Approved Projects t? 'a ? rd oe 7 pt 9<1 $ 3 ,?}" 4 SS ? EE ??"A>? pi py ?{ ... ?1"?. 3 ? P 3 W,%??.???,.a J?•4 ..p e?, #1: View of Mandalay Beach Club: Note terraced/tapered building height, recessed wall planes and retail frontage. #3: Sandpearl Project: Note terraced building height, multiple recessed wall planes and retail/pedestrian- scale frontage. #4: Proposed Gionos Project: Mandalay Ave. facade. Note lack of terraced building height, flat facade/no strong articulation and lack of retail along Mandalay creates "dead space" along Mandalay frontage. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEM CITY OF CLEAMWER . :.'F^916 . I r. . ! r. #2: View of Belle Harbor: Note terraced building height and recessed wall planes. WkFiokIIku - kvLHIIIa - E& LL is 7alrn0'P SANDPFARt BY Wt t.OMIALN1111 G BSH ARCHMMSM PIANNFRSIN+' • • EXHIBIT D New and Approved Projects 4 9 { INA kf f }i d= nr? x. , lv? 3 agS ,' t t #1: View of Mandalay Beach Club: Note terraced/tapered building height, recessed wall planes and retail frontage. 0 0 EXHIBIT D New and Approved Projects #2: View of Belle Harbor: Note terraced building height and recessed wall planes. Engelhardt, Hammer Associates, Iris. 15 0 0 EXHIBIT D New and Approved Projects WPM okIAU I kWR R U.J a° a I aTkIrg R SANDPEARL BY JMC COMMUNITIES BSB ARCHITECTS &c PLANNERS INC #3: Sandpearl Project: Note terraced building height, multiple recessed wall planes and retail/pedestrian-scale frontage. AsSOO EXHIBIT D Gionos Project 'A 1? k _ n ? `q J1 xtox #4: Proposed Gionos Project: Mandalay Ave. fagade. Note lack of terraced building height, flat fagade/no strong articulation and lack of retail along Mandalay creates "dead space" along Mandalay frontage. ORIGINAL RECEIVED CEP 2 71006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Engelhardt, Hann ner & Associates, Inc '17 RESPONSE TO GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA GIONOS PROJECT City of Clearwater Land Development Code General Applicability Criteria 3-913.A Level Two applications, in order to be approved by the Community Development Board, shall meet each and every one of the following criteria: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. • Response The proposed development of the land is NOT in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. New and approved developments surrounding the proposed Gionos project are consistent with the community character of the Destination Tourist District. These projects (Mandalay Beach Club, Sandpearl, Pelican Walk and Belle Harbor) exhibit strong architectural fenestration and pedestrian scale architectural features, as well as providing retail and/or restaurant uses along the street. These projects, along with the existing context, create a strong continuous facade and a pedestrian-oriented commercial frontage along Mandalay Avenue (Exhibit A). The project does not propose retail or restaurant uses. Pursuant to Beach by Design, "The preferred form of redevelopment for this area is mixed use with resort residential and hospitality uses fronting on the Beach and retail, restaurant and residential uses fronting on North Mandalay." "Currently, more than half of the frontage on North Mandalay does not have an active retail facade on both sides of the street. This lack of "closure" diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street. Ideally, North Mandalay would be redeveloped as a two-sided retail street with retail uses on both sides of a street which is sufficiently pedestrian-friendly that shoppers could easily cross from one side to the other." With the Gionos project's proposed building tower setback of fifteen (15) feet from Mandalay Avenue, the project design creates disruption in the existing continuous building frontage and streetscape activity along Mandalay Avenue. This break in the existing street frontage context diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street that is pedestrian-oriented in scale (Exhibit B). Engelhardt. H avtker 6". Associates, 1#11. - ???? 0 0 Further, there is no pedestrian/streetscape scale to the project. The building tower is set back fifteen (15) feet with no retail or restaurant uses. The plan does provide two pergolas that front along the sidewalk; however, these only function as passive spaces and are not in keeping with the existing pattern of active pedestrian-scale retail uses fronting along Mandalay. Pursuant to Beach by Design, "North Mandalay sidewalks should be designed so that pedestrians can walk along building facades, and the curbside portion of the sidewalk is dedicated to landscaping and street amenities including cafe seating and casual setting of street furniture. Property owners should provide arcades or awnings to provide cover for pedestrians during inclement weather." Because of its lack of strong facade articulation along its Mandalay Avenue frontage, it creates a "blank wall" effect, which will result in a negative visual impact on the Mandalay Avenue frontage and will diminish the pedestrian scale of the streetscape. The proposed 82 foot high facade has very minimal wall plane breaks and facade details, which do not create strong vertical or horizontal relief compared to other new and approved projects (Exhibit D). In fact, the facade is relatively flat in that there are no prominent projecting architectural features or fenestration or deep wall plane recesses or variations in facade height. Wall plane breaks are only five (5) feet in depth. The "blank wall" effect is compounded by the lack of facade transparency that should be created by windows and open balconies, not just decorative wall treatment. Other taller buildings along Mandalay Avenue are set back from the street while maintaining lower scale frontage along the street with commercial uses. Further, these developments taper building height to reduce massing (Exhibits C and D). The Gionos project does not taper building height along the Mandalay Avenue frontage or on the west elevation, which further contributes to its blank wall effect. Not tapering or terracing building height creates massive building scale relative to its land area and site configuration. The Gionos tower occupies almost 40 percent of the project land area. In comparison, the adjacent Sandpearl south tower only occupies 24 percent of the project site land area. The project has no definable or aesthetically pleasing entrance or major focal point. Pursuant to Beach by Design General Design Guidelines, building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 7 2006 PCB OF CLEARW IERT E.J • This project is at a prominent location and therefore, merits a design that exhibits strong architectural fenestration and detailing, pedestrian scale street frontage and tapered building height. The proposed project does not exhibit any of these qualities and is out of scale in portion to its land area. As noted above, in addition to failing to address Criteria #1, the proposed project fails to address the following Beach by Design General Design Guidelines: Bulk 1. To promote development and redevelopment which is in scale with the character and function of Clearwater Beach. 3. To ensure that new development is compatible with existing buildings. 4. To maintain a distinct character on Clearwater Beach. 6. To promote diversity in the scale, mass and height of buildings. Design 1. To ensure aesthetically pleasing architecture in a tropical vernacular. 2. To create inviting, human scale "places" at the street level of all buildings. 3. To promote an integration of form and function. 4. To create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" throughout Clearwater Beach. 7. To ensure that the street level of all buildings is pedestrian. Design, Scale and Massing of Buildings 3. At least sixty percent (60%) of any elevation will be covered with windows or architectural decoration. For the purpose of this standard, an elevation is that portion of a building that is visible from a particular point outside the parcel proposed for development. Street- Level Facades The human scale and aesthetic appeal of street-level facades, and their relationship to the sidewalk, are essential to a pedestrian-friendly environment. Accordingly: 3. Building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. 5. Awnings and other structures that offer pedestrians cover from the elements are recommended. Awnings help define entryways and provide storefront identity to both pedestrians and drivers. Engelhardt, Hanimer & Associates, Inc. 20 • • 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Response The proposed development WILL hinder the continuity of street frontage and commercial use along Mandalay Avenue, encouraging inappropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings and potentially impair the value of adjacent development. The project does not propose retail or restaurant uses. Pursuant to Beach by Design "The preferred form of redevelopment for this area is mixed use with resort residential and hospitality uses fronting on the Beach and retail, restaurant and residential uses fronting on North Mandalay." "Currently, more than half of the frontage on North Mandalay does not have an active retail facade on both sides of the street. This lack of "closure" diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street. Ideally, North Mandalay would be redeveloped as a two-sided retail street with retail uses on both sides of a street which is sufficiently pedestrian-friendly that shoppers could easily cross from one side to the other." With the Gionos project's proposed building set back fifteen (15) feet from Mandalay Avenue, the project design creates a disruption in the existing continuous building frontage and streetscape activity along Mandalay Avenue. This disruption in the existing street frontage diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street that is pedestrian-oriented in scale. The proposed peroglas along Mandalay do not add to the activity of the streetscape, these only function as passive areas. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. • Response The proposed development WILL adversely affect the persons residing or working in the neighborhood. The proposed project is solely residential and replaces existing retail frontage along Mandalay Avenue. New projects along with the existing context create a strong continuous facade and a pedestrian-oriented retail front along Mandalay Avenue. A key element of any successful resort destination is a vital retail and restaurant district. This project will diminish the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street, which is a key element to attracting tourist and residents, and thereby, creating tourism employment. ORIGINAL RECEIVED S EP 2 7 2006 Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. CITY OF • • 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. • No Response 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. • Response The proposed development is NOT consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. New and approved developments surrounding the proposed Gionos project are consistent with the community character of the Destination Tourist District. These projects (Mandalay Beach Club, Sandpearl, Pelican Walk and Belle Harbor) exhibit strong architectural fenestration and pedestrian scale architectural features, as well as providing retail and/or restaurant uses along the street. These projects along with the existing context create a strong continuous fagade and a pedestrian-oriented commercial front along Mandalay Avenue (Exhibit A). The Gionos project proposes a building setback of fifteen (15) feet from Mandalay Avenue. This setback creates a disruption in the existing continuous building frontage and streetscape activity along Mandalay Avenue. This break in the existing street frontage context diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street that is pedestrian-oriented in scale (Exhibit B). Further, there is no pedestrian/streetscape scale to the project. The building is set back fifteen (15) feet with no architectural fenestration that fronts along the sidewalk such as canopies, or activity spaces such as residential or preferably retail or restaurant uses. Pursuant to Beach by Design, "North Mandalay sidewalks should be designed so that pedestrians can walk along building facades and the curbside portion of the sidewalk is dedicated to landscaping and street amenities including cafe seating and casual setting of street furniture. Property owners should provide arcades or awnings to provide cover for pedestrians during inclement weather." The Gionos project along its Mandalay Avenue frontage creates a "blank wall" effect, which will create a negative visual impact on the Mandalay Avenue frontage and diminish the pedestrian scale of the streetscape. The proposed 82 foot high fagade wall has very minimal wall plane breaks and details, which do not create strong vertical or horizontal relief compared to other new and approved projects (Exhibit D). Engelhardt, Harnmer & Associates, Inc. ? 22 0 0 In fact, the facade is relatively flat in that there are no prominent projecting architectural features or fenestration or deep wall plane recesses or variations in facade height compared to other new and approved projects. Wall plane breaks are only five (5) feet in depth. The "blank wall" effect is compounded by the lack of facade transparency that should be created by windows and open balconies. In addition, taller buildings along Mandalay Avenue are significantly set back from the street while maintaining lower scale frontage along the street with commercial uses. Further, these developments taper building height to reduce massing (Exhibits C and D). The Gionos project does not taper building height along the Mandalay Avenue frontage or on the west elevation, which creates its blank wall effect. Further, the proposed project is massive in scale relative to its land area. The Gionos tower occupies almost 40 percent of the project land area. In comparison, the adjacent Sandpearl south tower only occupies 24 percent of the project site land area. This project is at a prominent location and therefore, merits a design that exhibits strong architectural fenestration and detailing, pedestrian scale street frontage and tapered building height. The proposed project does not exhibit any of these qualities and is out of scale in portion to its land area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. • Response The proposed development does NOT minimize adverse effects. As noted in Response #5, this project is NOT consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. In summation, the proposed Gionos Project fails to meet all General Applicability criteria: 1. Pursuant to their request for increased height, the project does not exhibit an improved design. 2. It lacks facade articulation, will create a "blank wall" effect along Mandalay Avenue and result in a negative visual impact on the Mandalay Avenue frontage. The tower does not taper in height and will create an uninviting and non- pedestrian scale to this section of Mandalay Avenue. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 71006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • 4. The project will create a discontinuity and lack of closure along the Mandalay Avenue retail frontage that will diminish Mandalay as a retail street. 5. The lack of retail uses and lack of pedestrian-oriented scale that this project will create along Mandalay, if approved, would set a precedent for permitting future inappropriate non-retail and non-pedestrian-oriented development along Mandalay Avenue. 6. Based on the above factors and given its prominent location at the corner of Baymont and Mandalay Avenue (gateway to the Destination Tourist and Retail/Restaurant Districts), the Gionos project would be a detriment to the Mandalay Avenue district and Beach by Design. :=a?c? lira t' tt, 1 r?trraa?? <; c;? 1r9, ,, t, r? ` 24 • 0 RESPONSE TO FLEXIBILITY REVIEW CRITERIA GIONOS PROJECT City of Clearwater Land Development Code Flexibility Criteria 2-803.13 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; • Not applicable. Not requesting reduction in required lot area/width. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; • The elimination of the current drives on Mandalay is proposed, with sole access on Baymont. 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; • Response The requested increase in height does NOT result in an improved design and appearance. This development is not consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed building setback for the Gionos project is fifteen (15) feet from Mandalay Avenue, which will create a disruption in the existing continuous building frontage and streetscape activity along Mandalay Avenue. This disruption in the existing street frontage context diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street that is pedestrian-oriented in scale (Exhibit B). Further, there is no pedestrian/streetscape scale to the project. The building is set back fifteen (15) feet with no architectural fenestration that fronts along the sidewalk such as canopies or activity spaces that reinforce the existing retail and restaurant uses that front along Mandalay Avenue. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, /tic. SAP 2 7 2006 CITY 0 0 The Gionos project along its Mandalay Avenue frontage creates a "blank wall" effect, which negatively impacts the Mandalay Avenue frontage and diminishes the pedestrian scale of the streetscape. The proposed 82 foot high fagade wall is relatively flat in that there are no prominent projecting architectural features or fenestration, or deep wall plane recesses or variations in fagade height. In contrast, other developments along Mandalay Avenue do exhibit these design features (Exhibit D). Other taller buildings along Mandalay Avenue are set back from the street while maintaining lower scale frontage along the street with commercial uses. These developments also taper building height, thereby reducing massing (Exhibits C and D). The Gionos project does not taper building height along the Mandalay Avenue frontage or on the west elevation, thereby, creating a more massive building form. The Gionos project is at a prominent location, and therefore, merits a design that exhibits strong architectural fenestration and detailing, pedestrian scale street frontage and tapered building height. The proposed project does not exhibit any of these qualities and is out of scale in portion to its land area. b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building; • Response: Not applicable 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; • Response: Not applicable b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; • Response: Not applicable c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; • Response: Not applicable Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, 47c 26 0 0 d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plarbwtefficient parking or improved design and appearance; REGF"'" • Response: Not applicable d SEP ?.. i Y, K 'VItNT 5. Off-street parking: CITY Ot--GAWATER. a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; • Response: Not applicable b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. • Response The project along its Mandalay Avenue frontage creates a facade treatment that in effect is a "blank wall", which will create a negative visual impact on the Mandalay Avenue frontage and diminish the pedestrian scale of the streetscape. This project is at a prominent location and therefore, merits a design that exhibits strong architectural fenestration and detailing and pedestrian scale street frontage. The proposed project does not exhibit any of these qualities compared to surrounding developments. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. • Response: The proposed development does NOT comply with the Tourist District guidelines, which by reference incorporates the design guidelines in Beach by Design. As discussed in responses to the General Applicability criteria, the proposed Gionos Project fails to meet all the criteria. New and approved developments surrounding the proposed Gionos project are consistent with the community character of the Destination Tourist District. These projects (Mandalay Beach Club, Sandpearl, Pelican Walk and Belle Harbor) exhibit strong architectural fenestration and pedestrian scale architectural features, as well as providing retail and/or restaurant uses along the street. These projects Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc. ? 27 0 0 along with the existing context create a strong continuous facade and a pedestrian-oriented commercial front along Mandalay Avenue (Exhibit A). The Gionos project's proposed building setback is fifteen (15) feet from Mandalay Avenue, creating a disruption in the existing continuous building frontage and streetscape activity along Mandalay Avenue. This disruption in the existing street I frontage context diminishes the potential of North Mandalay as a retail street that is pedestrian-oriented in scale (Exhibit B). The Gionos project along its Mandalay Avenue frontage creates a "blank wall" effect, which will result in a negative impact on the Mandalay Avenue frontage and diminish the pedestrian scale of the streetscape. The proposed 82 foot high fagade wall is relatively flat in that there are no prominent projecting architectural features or fenestration or deep wall plane recesses or variations in fagade height. In contrast, other developments along Mandalay Avenue do exhibit these design features (Exhibit D). In addition to the above comments, the proposed project fails to address the following Beach by Design General Design Guidelines: Bulk 1. To promote development and redevelopment which is in scale with the character and function of Clearwater Beach. 3. To ensure that new development is compatible with existing buildings. 4. To maintain a distinct character on Clearwater Beach. 6. To promote diversity in the scale, mass and height of buildings. Design 2. To create inviting, human scale "places" at the street level of all buildings. 3. To promote an integration of form and function. 4. To create a sense of a "beach community neighborhood" throughout Clearwater Beach. 7. To ensure that the street level of all buildings is pedestrian. Street- Level Facades The human scale and aesthetic appeal of street-level facades, and their relationship to the sidewalk, are essential to a pedestrian-friendly environment. Accordingly: 3. Building entrances should be aesthetically inviting and easily identified. 5. Awnings and other structures that offer pedestrians cover from the elements are recommended. Awnings help define entryways and provide storefront identity to both pedestrians and drivers. 28 This project is at a prominent location, and therefore, merits a design that exhibits strong architectural fenestration and detailing, pedestrian scale street frontage and tapered building height. The proposed project does not exhibit any of these qualities and is out of scale in portion to its land area. In summation, the proposed Gionos Project fails to meet Flexibility criteria #3, #5 and #6: 1. Pursuant to their request for increased height, the project does not exhibit an improved design. 2. It lacks facade articulation, will create a "blank wall" effect along Mandalay Avenue and result in a negative visual impact on the Mandalay Avenue frontage. 3. The tower does not taper in height and will create an uninviting and non- pedestrian scale to this section of Mandalay Avenue. 4. The project will create a discontinuity and lack of closure along the Mandalay Avenue retail frontage that will diminish Mandalay as a retail street. 5. The lack of retail uses and lack of pedestrian-oriented scale that this project will create along Mandalay, if approved, would set a precedent for permitting future inappropriate non-retail and non-pedestrian-oriented development along Mandalay Avenue. 6. Based on the above factors and given its prominent location at the corner of Baymont and Mandalay Avenue (gateway to the Destination Tourist and Retail/Restaurant Districts), the Gionos project would be a detriment to the Mandalay Avenue district and Beach by Design. ORIGINAL RECEIVED `..°=P 2'7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates, Inc;. 29 00 M o Mary G. 3376 490 andalay Ave. CleaNvater Beach. I^I< 7 September 19, 20086 To Whore it May Concern: is Nick Gionis, President of Mary G. Realty, which is located at 490 My name A W, I am here tO ask for your approval of the development of the t?aa?d?lay , yl prof) ?, ` Mw ago. ter, Chee um walled rye to ;yet up a meeting tw fi?:us this pr??ect, ??e rest at his office with his associate, john. and he t--old ?. that he did not want me to develop the property, or at the very least to net develop it the way we planned to. He asked that it we went ahead with the development, that he wanted us to not exceed four to five floors so that we would not block his view, as his future buyers and owners were not happy with the He told us that he would have legal issues with his current owners, and plans. that is why he does not want us to develop our property. He offered to help us create new plans that would accommodate his need. Who is Mr. Cheezurn that we all have to work to accommodate his needs so that he can succeed in all his ventures, and all the PRIMATE property owners surrounding hire, cannot. Many of whore, like us, have supported Clearwater Beach for over thirty years as business; borne and property owners. We are ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 6 2006 pLANNING DUARTMENT CITY OF CLF?WATER N requesting less than the maximum height than is allowed in the code. and we have not transferred any additional units of density to the protect as is aliowe::.:. We have a ?_Q foot setback compared to a 5 foot setback that was approved and recommended by the city and the CDB. Ladies and Gentlemen, these are the facts: This project is allowed under the "teach by Design" guidelines. It is NOT prohibited. If the proposal meets the design criteria, it should be approved. It is a whole lot better than most of the other huge projects that MAXIMIZE the height and setback reauests and that come forward with a recommendation of approvai.. Thank you, 3 t g lNichol6s A. Gionis President Mary G. Fealty. Inc. requesting less than the rrraximurn height than is allowed in the code. and w c have not transferred any additional units of density to the project as is aiiowirecv.. We. have a 20 foot setback compared to a 5 foot setback that was approved and recommended by the city and the CDB. Ladies and Gentlemen, these are the facts: This project is allowed under the "Beach by Design" guidelines. It is NOT prohibited. If the proposal meets the design criteria, it should be approved. It is a whole lot better than most of the other huge projects that MAXIMIZE the height and setback requests and that come forward with a recommendation of approval.. Thank you, tt . GX- Nichol s A. Gionis President Mary G. Realty, Inc:. PLS*-00L. 0 2ooq Mandalay project 140qy, S 9" tcl-ofo 9/19/06 I am in favor of this Mandalay project for many reasons, and I will tell you some of them. 1 st. The newly developed buildings, surrounding the Gionis brothers small plaza, on Clearwater beach, look like big giants. The small plaza, no longer looks like it fits with the other buildings. It looks funny and for that reason has to be developed. 2nd. The economical market in this location has been very slow and a small business cannot survive there. Even the new stores across the street are having problems to stay in business. 3rd. The trememdous increases in Pinellas county property taxes shows no mercy to this small plaza. Therefore, this property must be developed. 4th. I know the Gionis brothers for the last 20 years. They work hard on the beach, day and night to serve people better. But lately they have only a fewer customers to serve. 5th. This proposed project, looks good and fits well in that area and therefore must be developed. This proposed project does not violate any of the city ordinances. Today I congratulate the Gionis brothers for not asking for more than what the building codes and the city ordinances permits. Today. I came in front of your board, to support this good looking project. And to thank all of you, for protecting and stand up for rights of the small property owners. To thank you for protecting the American property rights and the city of Clearwater ordinances. ORIGINAL Thank you RECEIVED Terry Tsafatinos SEP 2 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ,t L 7 LUCL- Consistency Analysis - General Standards Gionis By The Sea Location: Southwest corner of North Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, City of Clearwater Project: 12 residential units and street plaza City of Clearwater General Standards Section 3-913. General standards for Level One and Level Two approvals. A. Level One applications, in order to be approved by the community development coordinator, and Level Two applications, in order to be approved by the community development board, shall meet each and every one of the following criteria: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Consistent: YES Explanation: The proposed residential project with plaza is consistent with the character of the adjacent land uses - which consists of a. mix of residential, resort hotel and retail land uses. The proposed residential project with plaza, in terms of scale, bulk, lot coverage and density, in relation to abutting existing, under construction and/or proposed projects is of less intensity. The immediately adjacent project, the Sandpearl, isa massive project that towers above the subject site, five feet off the western property boundary with a project height of 150 feet. This project also wraps around the south side of the subject site with additional residential and retail uses tapering down to a height of approximately 48 feet. The adjacent project to the north is also a large project consisting of a 253 room hotel complex with a height of 95 feet. A mid/high rise residential project exists on the northeast corner of Baymont and North Mandalay with heights of approximately 100 and 130 feet. The bulk and scale of these projects are on a far grander scale than the proposed Gionis By The Sea project. The proposed project is to consist of 12 residential units with a building height of approximately 82 feet. p The proposed residential/plaza land use project is entirely in harmony with the character of adjacent properties. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 2 6 206 PLANNINGw DEPARTMENT CITY ON --LEARWATER BOX 18282 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33679-8282. 813.870.3494 (O) • 813.767.5763 (C) . S'I`EVE@LUCEPI.ANNING.COM 41 LA1 NING GROUP L CE M N 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Consistent: YES Explanation: The proposed residential development will not hinder the development or redevelopment of adjacent properties as either residential, resort hotel or retail land uses. Residential development on the subject site will improve the chances for success of the retail uses along Mandalay Avenue as the establishment of additional residential will result in additional `on-site' retail customers likely to patronize the retail businesses along North Mandalay. In addition, an important component of the proposed project is a proposed at grade plaza along Mandalay Avenue which will include tables and chairs, benches, a fountain with informal seating on the fountain edge, pergolas and shade trees. This plaza also contemplates a small intimate stage for small scale entertainment venues, an information board and an area will be available for sidewalk vendors. The on- street parking, street trees and street lights will assist in creating separation from the street in creating a safe haven and well defined edge for this proposed plaza. This proposed plaza will also contribute to the success of the North Mandalay Avenue retail district as residents and tourists will have a place to come and relax, rest and experience the larger North Mandalay community environment. The proposed plaza can become a potential destination on its own, which can contribute to residents and tourists decisions to shop along North Mandalay Avenue, stay longer and come back more often. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Consistent: YES Explanation: The proposed residential development will not adversely affect the public health or safety or residents or workers in the community. The project will be designed and constructed in a manner that is consistent with all City of Clearwater and all other applicable regulatory agency site development and building code requirements. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Consistent: YES Explanation: 2 M M The site currently has a driveway located on North Mandalay. This driveway is being removed - eliminating a point of conflict with vehicles and pedestrians. Access to the site will be via Baymont Street. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Consistent: YES Explanation: The community character consists of a combination of mid and high rise residential, resort hotel and retail land uses. The subject proposed mid rise residential project which will include an attractive/inviting at grade plaza is consistent with these land uses and the overall character of the North Mandalay Avenue community. It should be noted that the section of the Beach by Design document that speaks to the land uses on the west side of North Mandalay Avenue suggests that retail uses be considered as the preferred use at grade in this area. The majority of the west side of North Mandalay Avenue, from the traffic circle north to Baymont Street is developed with at grade retail uses. However, in consideration of this document, the recognition of the existing and proposed extent of retail along the Avenue, the location of the subject site at the northern most terminus of existing and/or planned retail, the lack of any other intentional plaza within the retail district, a plaza that compliments the North Mandalay retail district and would represent the northern terminus or gateway to the retail district was viewed as a desirable land use for this specific parcel. This residential project with plaza will also act as a transition to the residential and hotel uses to the north, and as proposed, be entirely in harmony with the adjacent and overall community character. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Consistent: YES Explanation: The proposed residential building is located towards the back (western side) of the property providing for a buffer between any street activity and the adjacent uses further to the west. A buffer wall is proposed along the southern property line to mitigate any de-minimus noise or other adverse impacts associated with the activities of a plaza. The proposed plaza use will be regulated and comply with all visual, noise, odor and hours of operation requirements of the City of Clearwater. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 5r--:P 2 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ? N B. In the event of an express conflict between a particular flexibility criterion and a provision of Article 3, the flexibility criterion shall govern unless the context clearly implies that the Article 3 provision should control. (Ord. No. 7413-05, § 18, 5-5-05) Prepared By: Steve Luce, AICP President, Luce Planning Group, Inc. Prepared For: Gionis By The Sea, City of Clearwater Date: September 18, 2006 4 7 - G LUC_E: Consistency Analysis - Flexible Development Standards Gionis By The Sea Location: Southwest corner of North Mandalay Avenue and Baymont Street, City of Clearwater Project: 12 residential units and street plaza cab ?19 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED `'`- r 26 2006 PLAKJh , - DEPARTMEF Wit ,.'? ,;s.WWATEF City of Clearwater Flexible Development Standards - Attached Dwellings B. Attached dwellings. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; Consistent: YES Explanation: Not Applicable. 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; Consistent: YES Explanation: Access to the subject site is proposed on Baymont Street. An existing driveway located on North Mandalay Avenue will be eliminated improving traffic conditions and eliminating a point of conflict with pedestrians on Mandalay. 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building; Consistent: YES The increase in height from 30 feet to 82.5 feet will allow for the proposed 12 residential units to be designed so that all the units will have views of the beach and the gulf via the view corridor down Baymont Street. In addition, the building footprint is setback off of the western property boundary to gain some separation and provide some air and light between the subject project and the large scale 150 foot tall mixed use residential project currently being developed within 5 feet of the subject site's western property line. The result is an improved site plan that creates a viable residential project. In addition, the design is consistent with the Beach by Design architectural design guidelines - resulting in an improved physical appearance. pn? D. BOX 18282 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33679-8282 v 813.870.34941((0) v 813.767.5763 (C) • STEVE@LUCEPLANNING.CQM N N of The increase in height is also associated with the provision of parking below the residential units, which also enhances the overall appearance of the project. 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback contributes to a more active and dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; Consistent: YES Explanation: First, to clarify the proposed building meets all of the zoning district setback requirements. It is only the associated ancillary structures: solid waste pad and screening, water fountain, pergolas and plaza related furniture that do not meet the district setback standards. The reduction in the front yard setback along Baymont Street is associated with the solid waste pad and screening wall. This location is dictated by the City of Clearwater, is functional and allows for the efficient collection of solid waste. The reduction in the front yard setback along North Mandalay Avenue is associated with the ancillary structures provided within the proposed plaza area. The proposed residential building is to be setback 15 to 20 feet from the property line. Within this area pedestrian amenities are proposed such as: tables, chairs, pergolas and trees for shade, a fountain, a small stage area, trash receptacles, information board, and potentially an area set aside for street vendors. The reduction in the front yard setbacks will contribute to a more active and dynamic street life. The reduction in front setback results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a proposed building are such that the likely uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand- generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without parking on the ground level. 2 N Consistent: YES M Explanation: Not Applicable However, the site is designed to accommodate the required parking beneath the building, screened from view. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. Consistent: YES Explanation: The building is meeting the architectural guideline which calls for - where a building dimension exceeds 100 feet that no more than two of the three building dimensions in the vertical or horizontal planes are equal in length. The building height is 82.5 feet. The building width along North Mandalay Avenue is approximately 140 feet. The width along Baymont Street is approximately 65 feet. The building is meeting the guideline which calls for building planes that continue uninterrupted for greater than 100 feet - that the building wall be offset by a distance of at least 5 feet. The building plane is offset by at least 7 feet - thus meeting this guideline. The building should have at least 60% coverage with windows and architectural decoration on any elevation (visible from a point outside the parcel). This requirement is being met through the provision of windows and architectural decoration covering more than 60% of the elevations that qualify. The building is meeting the architectural guideline which calls for no more than 60% of the theoretical maximum building envelope located above 45 feet. The building envelope above 45 feet is less than 50%. Furthermore, it should be added that the project proposes to incorporate a plaza along North Mandalay Avenue which will vary in depth from 15 to 20 feet. Within this plaza, as described above, it will include numerous pedestrian amenities. This space will be designed and constructed in a manner entirely consistent with the streetscape design guidelines discussed in the Beach by Design document. Prepared By: Steve Luce, AICP President, Luce Planning Group, Inc. Prepared For: Gionis By The Sea, City of Clearwater Date: September 18, 2006 ORIGINAL RECEIVED ,q! -:.P 2 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ?-? p 2ooe• u ?,,..? qqO 1 &0 t I Col> 9-1e-04 ?& Gionos Comparison with Surrounding Projects • 0 Design Element Mandalay Ave. Ground Bldg Setback Ground Floor Retail Mandalay Ave. Tower Setback Tapered Tower Height Consistent with Beach by Design Tourist Destination District Gionos by the Sandpearl Sandpearl Mandalay Sea North South Beach Club 15 feet 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet No Yes (Hotel) Yes Yes 76 feet (from property line ±180 feet 15 feet to parking 110 feet (scaled from structure) aerial) No Yes Yes Yes No L Yes Yes Yes Retail Restaurant District Pelican Walk 4.77 feet Yes 68 feet No Yes Marina District Belle Harbor 18 feet No North Tower: ±135 feet South Tower: ±110 feet (scaled from aerial Yes Yes t0 W W 3 o 4.4 Q cQ O? L z aV • I have known the Gionis family for over 30 years and they are among the first acquaintances that we made upon our move to Clearwater Beach. As long as I have known them they have always had a positive and active vision as to the growth, beautification, and progress of Clearwater Beach. From the time when they owned and operated the family friendly Fritz's Market to the inception of Gionis Plaza, the Gionis family has always provided a valuable service to our community and have become a staple of the north end of the beach. It is perplexing that anyone would have any objections to the proposal by the Gionis family considering that the design includes strong consideration to the local style and architecture and would only add to the quaint charm of Clearwater Beach unlike several enormous high rise monstrosities that give minimal regard to the setbacks taking 5 feet while the Gionis family is abiding by the city code which is 30 feet. Their proposal is reasonable and abides by ALL codes and regulations. The Gionis family has owned the aforementioned property for a much longer period of time than Mr. Cheezam and based on this reason alone the Gionis family should have priority consideration. The plan that the Gionis family has proposed will provide aesthetic value such as a beautiful fountain and helpful amenities such as park benches and a welcome center that is beneficial not only for the patrons but for those passing by as well. It would be a travesty to deny our community this magnificent opportunity that has been proposed by the Gionis family to beautify our community. It is immoral as well to discriminate against individuals who have contributed to our community for over 30 years and therefore there is no viable reason to deny family their auspicious and beneficial vision. Thank you for your time and consideration. li\??- A-a%r7 f SEP 18 2606 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER rz! r\ 33??rl 0 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Anthony Saravanos [asaravanos@boardwalkcompany.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 490 Mandalay Hearing Mr. Wells, I am writing this email because I unfortunately cannot attend the 1:00pm hearing this afternoon, but ask that my e- mail be read at the hearing in my absence. Having grown up in Island Estates in the early 1980's and spending a lot of time of Clearwater Beach, I have seen the progression of development changing Clearwater Beach from a Florida "beach town" to a world class destination housing some of the nicest ocean front condominiums on the West Coast of Florida. Over the last five year period, many property owners have taken advantage of the changing demand for beach condominiums and cashed out either by selling to development companies or seeing a project through themselves. The property owners in today's hearing have owned 490 Mandalay since 1983. During those years the owners operated various food service businesses on the Beach, providing a service to locals and tourists alike. They are now looking at their options and attempting to redevelop their property for the "highest and best use" just as many other owners and developers have done during this last residential housing boom. Despite the fact that their plan is conforming in all "Beach by Design" standards, they are being met with potential opposition. I find it rather ironic and disconcerting that a 23 year property owner has to meet higher standards than the recent "developers" who have come into Clearwater Beach assembled properties, sold off their projects and cashed out. The City and County have survived over the years from the tax dollars that the Gionis family and many other long time business owners on Clearwater Beach have been faithfully paying. To now penalize this faithful "small" business owner who is attempting to do exactly what has been permitted to large scale developers dozens of times throughout the last five years sends a horrible message to the people of Clearwater about interests and double standards. For the reasons outlined above, I feel that their project as designed should be allowed without any further hindrance. Should you need to contact me, I will be available on my mobile phone number listed below. Thank you for your consideration. Anthony Saravanos The Boardwalk Company (727) 784-1007 main (727) 784-1008 fax (727) 643-8922 mobile asaravanos@boardwalkcompany.com www.boardwalkcomDanv.com 9/19/2006 June 8, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater Official Records and Legislative Services P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 337584748 Dear Mr. Delk, As a twenty-five year resident of Clearwater Beach and as one who has been active in the life of the beach community, I am writing in support of the request of the Mary G Realty (Nick Gionis) request concerning the construction of 12 condominium units on Baymont Street. I am, in this instance, speaking as a private citizen and not for the Chapel By The Sea (which I serve as pastor) because its Board has neither discussed nor made a decision regarding the matter. And while I personally have some concerns regarding the proliferation of condominium units on the beach (in most cases replacing hotel/motel units), I fully support the right of a long-time beach property owner to do what so many "newcomers" have received permission to do. If all kinds of variances and density allotments can be granted (and in many cases transferred) to the large corporations building mega-projects, surely they cannot be refused when the "little guy"wants to do the same thing. Since I will be out of town on June 20, the day this matter will be discussed by the Community Development Board, I am writing to you ahead of time in the hope that my opinion will be considered. Sincere , RECEIVED JUN 0 9 2006 Herbert Freitag PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r - 4 LONG RAN'GF PI-ANNING DFVFI.OPMEN-I' REVIEW .- s C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CI.EARWATFR, FI.oRIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.r AVF-NUF, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 Ti:1.rPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 September 20, 2006 Mr. Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 701 South Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-02009 490 Mandalay Avenue Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 19, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (north along Baymont Street) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain and trash staging area), reductions to the front (east along Mandalay Avenue) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to plaza, fountain, pergolas and raised platform) and an increase to the building height from 35 feet to 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof), under the provisions of Section 2-803.13. The Community Development Board (CDB) DENIED the application with the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: Findings of Fact: 1. The subject 0.4 acres is located within the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a shopping center with retail sales and a restaurant; 3. The proposal is for the demolition of the existing commercial building and the construction of a high-rise residential building of 12 attached dwellings; 4. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Destination.Resort" District; 5. The proposal meets or exceeds required setbacks to the south and west; 6. The proposed building height is 82.5 feet (to midpoint of pitched roof); 7. The proposed building height is consistent and compatible with the height of buildings constructed, under construction or approved within the surrounding area; 8. The proposal includes 25 parking spaces on the ground level, which meets the minimum Code requirement of two parking spaces per unit; 9. While the building facades have been greatly improved, the proposal still does not comply with the attached dwelling criteria requiring "an improved site plan or improved design and appearance" relating to the request for increased height; 10. The building and site layout, coupled with the lack of an active retail fagade along the Mandalay Avenue frontage, even with the applicant's alternative (plaza; fountain, seating, pergolas and the PRANK I IIRRARD, MAYOR JoIIN DoInN, Cc uN<:n. n[. nlr:R I IMT I I:\M11 ]ON, O MALM :NIBER C:\w.r:N A. Pri FRSEN. CO[ NCILME BER BILL JclN,ulx, CUUNCIIAIh: IIiF.it AOL „FIQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND ARPiR;\IATIVr Ac:riON 1?;?mi.clYiat„ I September 20, 2006 Zayac - Page Two "Mandalay Information Center") does not create a design that is harmonious and suitable for this high profile location on Mandalay Avenue; 11. This proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 12. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria for attached dwellings per Section 2-803.B; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is not in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Staff concludes that this proposal does not further the goals of the Destination Resort District of Beach by Design; and 4. Based on the above findings, Staff recommends denial of this application. An appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 3, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AI Planning Director Cc: Gerald Figurski, Esq. S:• Planning DepartmentIC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslMandalay 0490 Gionis Condominiums (7) - Deniedwandalay 490 Development Order.doc X006 - ~a oo ~ "INVESTIGATE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE" ~ r. . I~ Q ¦ CALL SUNSHINE @ 1-800-432-4770 FL STATUTE 553.851 (1979) REQUIRES A MIN. OF 2 DAYS AND MAX, OF 5 DAYS NOTICE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE. INDEX VICINITY MAP ~ ~ COVER SHEET ~ wurox owsoEx xASSw G WIMILRkI YM19011 PAY IEDN ~ NN BINIAIlEE DEMOLITION PLAN 2 L~EQfY wcxuu GNF iAYLGR~ FlUNNIW AYkTE MY ~ ILtlW ALWAN PM1~M SITE PLAN 3 pqE- IEVf MAplg1 ~ Y~.U4A VYE GRADING, DRAINAGE, & UTILITY PLAN 4 ~ GIPl6 6BARKKE GRWIE PA9C0 UTILITY & LANDSCAPE DETAILS 5 G9[EpA '1 PIt91A1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 6 PRO,I~CT ti PNFA ~ VICINITY ,ff GNEEgI]BEE a . s o ~,A ~~ro w M,HTN LYLOPLGiIE GVLEG LEF HEA'tl!Y Pl1MEEK]1 ~ ' R N S ~L~Ew . T. . Mom a• I I , _ ;,r,, c~./, ¦ ¦ L.~'~ ~i 67 • NOTE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, R,,OADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND CITY OF CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION MAP a ~ i c , ~ 4. T~_,--^_ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~'~ranada ~t ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L_a s w 4~ ~ , v~, ` LOTS 57 THROUGH 63 INCLUSIVE AND THE NORTH 10.25 FEET OF LOT 64, CLEARWATER ~ K L; f a-_ ~r BEACH PARK, `"ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 42, PUBLIC ~ , ~ ~ . ~ , . r ~ 1, 5 u ,mot Pain RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. st~ . ~ E , , ~ fl., ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ,L , ~ ~ , , _ ~ _ A , L ~ , Be~ t r ~ ~ ra ~la~l~~~~ ~ ~a~~~ L ~ fia~d o ~tgj ~ o y ~ i ~ ~ `s ; ~'~L 5 r~,et,Fa k~`~ ?~p 3; ~ Lv " I ' ri ~ ~/y ~L. ~ ~ ~i. ; ~IYE PLAN a Yf~ 5M ~ 1 I..w 777 ~ ~'.q CASE# r.D7,aob~ ©2DDq i%~ C~~BrU;I`dtel' B~dCh r.i ~ ~.:r CASE TYPE ~ ~ ~ 8 r J , ~ ~ t i d. DEC DATE 3 0 CDC DATE ~ 19 (y I~ i ~ j~ ~ SC~di. ~I %41E a G~yr~~,D 5iGNATUR W!_Q~., ,~`;,,,,,If~111,11rJa/, ~ ~ Lyld d ~ ~t DATE `:'}~°~'~~)1 o ~ ~ L.. , ~S . ~ i . ~ i i . _ L °~Grr~• r"f` o , 8~~i~~ a~ ,.I~ckson Pod r_; ~ ~ .b-: N~ . r .~~r~ a-« -~t ~ 'civi ~NGIN _ .IV L. E>rRl G,, ~.V_LANDSCAP~ ARCf11TECTUI?E PLANNIN( , . ~ Per, ~ ~ ~ _ FLANNING. ` • e a`~ ; r ~ Jf .m...... _F ~ ~ - ORIGINAL ~ % ~ ' ` ~ t,, . RECEIVED L, ~ ~ X701 CNTERPRISE ROAD E, SUITE 404 ~ C~19U813f1d u~t _ ~ LlJ c; ~ 4 r ~ 'S11FE1Y°'HARI~02 FL'OIZIDA'34695~~'"~~ ~ '~~"'-~`~~µ~^~V„°-~~-r-~~~ o. , i f i~ r~tt ,.,t PHONE: 727.793,9888 E pIANNING DEPARTMENT orow>r,g rnue ~ ~ ~ . ~ F' `FAX:- 727.793.9855 .E ~Ei~('~II~~:KFITW~E~Fi-fH~i~Y~1C~OM~-~- ~ . ~ v CITY 4F CLEARWATER :~~..~.~.~:r~ COVER ~T-~FFT -y N C C0 9 _ Agency App. / Permit No. Date Issued / Date Expires KZA Prof. No.: NA to Expires Owner Proj No.: 451-05 ti SWFWMD Scala SEE SHEETS E CITY OF CLEARWATER Sheet No. z 0) a c 0 o ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 1 of 6 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8' U,D• : 3'-4 ~ Finish gr 12' 24" 4'-4' ¦ 95/8 0.4'mii Finish grade to allow RAW , j ~ 0.4' min., 1.0' max. U , m fall fr fall from property I Z I I ~ ~ ~ line to b - Outfdl Pipe ~ N „ Cleanout Plug " line to back of curb, , ~ z 3 i 2-1/4" 2 1/4" 15" Ytnimum .o ~ Minimum 36 Behind Back Aluminum Skimmer iv ~ 0 ro Or Edge of Pavement 6" Benind eaak Of curb GRAPHIC SCALE z ' _ ~0 Pavement 20 o to 2D 40 ~ s-O" o ~ Weir , I ~ m° v v " 0 36„ 0., sidewalk nn a 1058 a N m N a m m Concrete Pad 4" ~ v J ~ II , F I Thick x 1'-8" Sq. 9 7/8" t ~ ~I ~ ( IN FEET ) N - ~ B' " 1 1 inch = 20 ft. ~ U Canaete Pad TYPE E 6 or 8 1/8 Bend , c a u ~ • Under Skimmer ~ Straight Bore 2' x 3/18' Rettaullne Bare 1-1/4' x 3/18' PIU M Double-Sweep Double-Sweep Tee 30"-36" or as ~ V = ~ Dedgn High PLAN VIEW Banda 1-1/2" x 1/4" See Note M Directed by the ~ U Water Level 5-3/4' dta Per Approx. Weight 215 tba ( ) . ~ Eye B City Engineer Q ~ To of Bank 5-3/4" ~ FDOT Index 201 8" P 3'- ' LEGEND ~ ~,I Grate Elev. 4.fi2 " ~ ~Q. steel F 2' ~ L Fa t skimmer with 4 etatnleee Sewer Main 13 1/2 go Grate steel bdte w/ lead anchaa CITY OWNED CITY OWNED HOMEOWNER OWNED _ i P EXISTING UTILITY/POWER POLE U s$ . d 2 Sed all edges of skimmer at ND AINTAIN ~ WaU Elev. 4.32 2 cantaat points with structure with AND MAINTAINED AND MAINTAINED Q ~ ~ Q ~r waterproof asulking a approved egad C LE AN O U T PLUG D E TAI L g~Aluminum Skimmer Elev. 4.12 6" Service Lateral 6" wm EXISTING WATER MAIN CLEANOUT DETAIL $ Pand Bottom Elev.- 3.50 t5 N.T.S. . service Lateral = _ _ _ _ _ = EXISTING SANITARY MAIN N N.T.S. Main _ NOTE: Cleanout plug to be ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE WRITTEN ~ U 41 outfall Plpe U.S. Foundry 7621 SECTION APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. SS EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE z . ~ "Iu.P 8' S' U.D. 15' Minimum INV,-1,50 or equal. /4 Bars Conc. Pad 0 12' Ctre. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA dTY OF CLEARWAIER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 4' Yin. Inetail B' (YIn.) PoBUC WORKS AOYINISTRATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING ~ ~uRUC wE~EEAp~~isrRAnoH SS PROPOSED SANITARY LINE N Z ~i° Grovel Bedding ar ~Y gym ow STANDARD 1 1 5 s s ~ eriaruuu. S7REC~AIL~~ ioam ~ ~ W Qi CROSS-SECTION ~ ouTFAU coNTRa a was dFAN OUT r psi Ad1Medi STRUCRIRE ~ Sanit ~ ~ ,na S-11 PROPOSED STRUCTURE NUMBER FDOT TYPE E INLET (Modified) ash 0°°~, w ueDER DRAIN 1 a? 1 raa 1 a1 R.&F~ { (1) 6"x2"x6" TEE & G.V, ® PROPOSED VALVE ~.4 (1) 90' ELBOW (1) 6"x6" TAPPING SLEEVE Uf PROPOSED WATER METER (1) 2" VALVE & VALVE INSTALLED BY CITY AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE STORM M.H. 111 RIM EL.= 4.60 DRAINAGE MH 11 D PROPOSED BACKFLOW PREVENTOR ~ INV, = 1.00 TOP EL=4.22 COI ~ 111N (1) 6"x6" TAPPING SLEEVE NE I.E.=0.14 ,Qr/ 111- FS PROPOSED FIRE LINE ~ ~ & VALVE INSTALLED BY CITY ,tirr 1 111 AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE TBM #1 rr 111 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY PER FND &D it I a 11 _ _ w PROPOSED WATER LINE Z ~ W CITY INDEX 402 LB 928 -___==~j # EL=4.28 ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ PROPOSED STORM SEWER ~ Q OD SANITARY MH CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL DOG HOUSE M.H. OVER EXISTING NAl/D 1988 TOP EL=4.82 - - - - - - - - (SEE SHEET N0. 5) ~ 8" P.V.C. SEWER MAIN & CONNECT PROPOSED 6" SAN. 71 L.F. 15" RCP N LE.=-3.31 I DRAINAGE MH ~ ~ E I.E.=-3.01 p I i0P EL=4.30 ~iJ Q 4FWFR (aD INV.-(_)~ 71 ~ I~ S I.E.=-3.32 As halt l o ~ PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT ~ ~ -q 4 I L4 W LE.=-3.03 ! 1 NE LE.=-1.43 ~ `o _ _4 _E r VEMENT 0 IIN 5E I.E.=-1.34 G~ SANITARY MH S =____=====c-___________________ 4 Asphalt py II^ ~ SW LE.=-1.71 _ ` 2.9,0' REPAIR PER CITY INDEX #104 c} I I Q / NW I.E.=-1.62 5 II - II A N LE.=-1.04 a' Pic 56 LF 6" D.LP. SAN. SERVICE _ _____a'_p_v_c ~1 / E LE.=-1.65 li c" c~N_PLU nc. rick P vin - S I g EROSION C SOUTH BLOCKED )SION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE: PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES: ~ h WITH SANDBAGS a Aspho~OTE: ACCESS DRIVE MAY j~J F1 rido Power MH l! - -BASER-ON-RROPOSED- - - G O REQUIRED EROSION II `~`~-q ri _ _ ~ I I ry RED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT 1. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET AND DEMOLITION FOR EROSION AND SILTATION iRUCT10N. FAILURE TO INSTALL OR PROPERLY MAINTAIN THESE CONTROL ALONG WITH GENERAL NOTES. ~ ~ 'I ROAD IMPROVfaE'~14~ ER II^ 1) M TER BACKFLOW P EVEN CONSTRUCTION. FA Met r y II INSTA LED BY CITY AT AID LI T conc. Curb Post II BARRICADES WILL CADES WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE ~ ~ . - _ - Block orn'er EXPENSE ,.,.X`.r;.'r:::r<<;;,,.;.:, : F N&D 0 CITATIONS AS PR( ONS, AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTERS 40D-4 AND 40D-40, F.A.C. 2. SEE SITE PLAN/HORIZONTAL CONTROL SHEET FOR SITE DATA. ~ a '3-;~~''~ .,~.4,,; ' ' `x`~'°~`" E ectric (1) 6 D CV W/BYPA ETE ' CONTROL STRUCTURE E-1 ~ - `''ir,('a't'j':rr~" 4' A • C nc. Ba LB 67 INITIATION OF CIVII • I ;wr^ I r~ I $ DRAINAGE MH iION OF CIVLL PENALTY PROCEDURES PURSUANT TO SECTION 3. SEE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR TEMPORARY BENCH U RIM EL, = 4.82 ~:f.. `+i s.r . -'^~~6"wm,. _ 373.129 F.A.C. C. WEIR EL. = 4.32 ~ 5 ~ N TOP EL-4.01 7 7 ?9, F.A.C., CAN RESULT IN A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000 MARK (TBM) LOCATIONS. 6 wm t~ ~ : F• ~ `t' toss NE I.E.=-0.79 INV: -~5U- • `1' 3`P, ~ J.ti dd & Bri k Crosswalk ~ PER OFFENSE WITF tr h."~, k. l~'~^~'pH' ,';+;?~~t'.a Signs! n S I 7 >'w ;tr „~~a,r,:' ~c'~±:':~:~•G.S .i ,E. OJ )FFENSE WITH EACH DATE DURING WHICH SUCH VIOLATION OCCURS 4. THE CONTRACTOR SMALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED a' ?65' Q'. ,;B '31;+ E f - ::;r';;~'~2, d,~;K^::~,:~ v :g': 6" oQ )pt ~:~s .,t • w CO U S m NSTIT TING A iITUTING A SEPARATE OFFENSE. IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MANUAL FCM 4"x4"5~ 100.61'(M) r5;~ a _ .I,, 'r' ,t~ , a -a. ~ I I LB 6707 :'y,.~•t,:;; N - a.s I FND N&D II GRATE INLET PREPARED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS. Z . ~ '`r,zi ~ d' LB 5776 II ~ x•~,r•;z: - ' ^ I Not Used II TOP EL=3.32 co ~ ~ I ~ ~ I _ _ _ ; y, , ' I I , [Q~~'JJ ~U/ ~y)PA MENT I N LE.- 0.73 I S LE.=-0.66 5. ACCORDING TO F.LR.M COMMUNITY PANEL # 1250960102E _ - Cight"~ I' RE AI P R CITY INDEX #1 STORM WATER POND e i:;1 .,.p~' Box ~I THE SITE IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONES "AE" (ELEV 12) ~ ~ LET=56 5.00 5' r'......,, s ~ I Planf II BOTTOM= 3.50 0 ? 'tiri' ss;,;..~. I^ I I !6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH IN R-O-W SHALL BE SODDED. ~ Q E-+ ~ ,.r,'~~~r I I I I I 1 5.40 ~ ~I 5.10 1 d I w ~ I l a `7. BUILDING ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED AND DISCHARGED TO STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS. ~ ~ E-+ s`~~1 ha; I I~ I I p I I -:,tt. ~ 1 `,•'.;=;".i;~;.' C•d ~9a I I ~ R RI L & CONNECT o I ORIGINAL ~ ~ 1 x~ I I G/ 0 OSE 1 RCP I I ~ RECFIU~D 1 ° . ~ AT IN =0.62 I~ ~.I , UTILITY NOTES ~ ~ Zpq~ ~ I t\ ~ Wig ~ 1 <•4' II Q I LOT 55 ro a I I I °0 in o 0 00 a ~ ~ ' ~ I I I py I 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING PLANNING DEPARIIVIEIVT ~ W ' : GRATE INLET ,C I i , , I TOP EL=2.99 I I UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ W L'J ~ ~'~'''~r ~ ~ j l E LE.=-0.28 ° G/ 'aid. II FROM THE CITY OF CLEARWATER UTILITY ATLAS. ~ ~ Z I M II - 6° ~ VC F.S. GRATE INLET 11 TOP EL=3.11 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND COORDINATE WATER ~ ~ ~ II I N LE.=-0.59 II SERVICE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ® QI Q LOT 54 • - W INVERT INACCESSIBLE ~''~•!fe~' a Power~l BOTTOM BOX EL=-0.52 d' 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND COORDINATE SEWER ~ i '~i'' C d I SERVICE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. w~ o a ~ I ~ 1=~ ~ 2~'I PVC W.S. ~ 5.80 ~ I I Wa ~ 4. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL Z ~ w A 5.80 II IY I I ~ POWER SERVICE WITH LOCAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. ~ ° Q ~ - ' ~ P~(1G (TYP) Q ~ g„ I ~ o O z 5. SEE SITE BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR LOCATION ~ w w ~ ~ ~ " i I I m ~ I I LOT 53 OF OTHER EXISTING UTILITIES. g~ II Q Qm o! °o: _ ~ o. ~ ~ FDC LOCATIO ...I~ 6. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL UTILITY NOTES. I I w d o II QQ N } Y 0] i ~ . III 0~ N ~II~ 7. INFORMATION DEPICTED REGARDING EXISTING UTILITIES IS ~ I r ~ p M I I, I APPROXIMATE AND IS NOT FIELD VERIFIED. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT ~ ~ ` 9„ I I OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR WILL .FIELD LOCATE & VERIFY LOT 52 q ~ z ~j ~ ~ I I EXISTING UTILITIES e.g. TYPE OF UTILITY, INVERT, CONDUIT MATERIAL ti:f q Ql C ~ Na I I V ECT. AND CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES 3 3 3 ~ i. 'f::';.•;., to .d ',q II I ro r; • . I I h V ~:M1: ' AND/OR CONFLICTS. ~ W W o y 5.90 Light iI U U U N .,yd.;. 'Box II _ i I 8. UNDERGROUND WATERMAINS AND HYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED, 0 0 0 0 < II I ^ u; I AND COMPLETED AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AS PER NFPA 241. I LOT 51 ~s, ~;a: ~j9a U ~ a a w o I- N I' A TOP OF PAVEMENT 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL FIRE SERVICE LINE FROM TAPPING ~ ; ; ° 5.10 ;°.~v;:, ' t.. II ELEV.= 5.10 VARIES VARIES SLEEVE & VALVE TO THE LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER ~ ~ ~ . , AND FROM DEVICE TO BLDG. ~ N 5.40 ;=r'%: ' I I ~ '.4 µ.;M1 :'•Y 'ti 1 ~,a . ^ 4 ~fpRIpF I 0 I \ \ \ „ 5• r ' ~ ~1 ~ o rn w 10.INSTALL A KNOX KEY BOX FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS AS PER a o FOP 2 1 2 I I Q v •o LOT 50 with Ned s II ~ ~ 4~~ NFPA 1, SEC. 3-6 OR EQUILVALENT. CONTACT LIFE SAFETY MANAGEMENT a a o ° W/F Coble f~ ~ R., : Q ~ v „ OFFICE AT CLEARWATER FIRE & RESCUE, 610 FRANKLIN STREET. THE LOCK REINFORCING 6 X 6 10/10 BOX MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION. ~ a M °z ;iy;1. , >7. I I I o C ~ Box :E'... II ~ WELDED WIRE MESH ~ ° . ~ d LOT 64• N 8321'58" W •'a 5 .d I I Q d (M) I ro 11. THE BUILDING IS TO BE SPRINKLED AND MUST CONFORM TO NFPA-13, rc W 1-N-O 2 N v b ' Ot ® a. 100 I ~ ~ a (N Included) (P) d g.: ° II TOE WALL AT TOP a'. I ° 0 ~~i~ .d' d d ° DO.OD t: ona.~ d.. d rll 17 ~ _ ao ~ ~ ~ .d." ' d o d d d a I I & SIDES APPROX. 12 DEEP O ro Conc. a: d ~ I 12" DEEP REINFORCED GUNITE LINING 12. THERE SHALL BE 7 1/2' FEET IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDES OF I a ~ m~N s ° d• ° 9 ° d ,v a II a I LOT 49 ~ ~ ~ n ° o ~ d I I THE FIRE HYDRANT, WITH 4 FOOT CLEARANCE TO THE REAR OF THE HYDRANT I ` y ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED AS PER NFPA-1 ~ t',`~ u7 a II 0 0 ,Cpe~~ WN , t,C~~ z d ° ~ II FND N&D CONCRETE 13. WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, ~ ~ ~ ~ LOT 65 m ~ ~ i I LB 6707 Powl erg ~N ~ ~ ii (0.435) SPILLWAY BOTTOM ~t~ F`~~~`b , AT INLET ELEV 3.50 THEY SHALL ~ ~ ~ o:~. v I I a FC1R 5/8 II - m LB 6707 I I ~ ~ ~ 14. ANY VAULTS OR RAMPS OVER WHICH EMERGENCY VEHICLES MAY HAVE TO TRAVEL ~ e~~ ~'rt= ~ z! E / MUST ~,'a 111c~<;,,~~; •r rnai u~ EsEr~NaiL TOE-APf TOE-APROX. 12"-18" DEEP'' MUST 15. TYPEREQUIREMELOCK EL=4.08 ii OF PINBELLASPROCOUNTYVIDED RDINANCEN98 04C APP IoATlO NPSY J tntr o NA VD 7988 U W IIQ CQNC M c\j CONCRETE SPILLWAY DETAIL FOR GATE TYPE LOCK BOX MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE LIFE SAFETY MANAGEMEN DRAWN BY. HAZ 0 I I T) TYPICAL SECTION (NTS) OFFICE 16. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT STATES, CHECK BY: KEZ N II j FND N&D B 5776 o "NO PARKING, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION" AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED WITH ORIGINAL DATE; 02/27/06 (Nat s I A CLEARANCE OF 7 1/2' FEET IN FRONT OF AND TO THE SIDES OF APPLIANCE SHEET o (0.27'E, 0.02 N) AS PER NFPC 2004 EDITION. z Block Corner i i SANITARY MH c FND N&D TOP EL=3.93 17. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND. A OF 6 LB 6707 v II N I.E.=-2.90 '3 0 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY `F ISSUE DATE: 08.10.06 GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES zl z 1. The Landscape Contractor shall grade planting beds, as required, to provide positive drainage and promote optimum i ~ ` plant growth. ~ " i / 2, All recommended trees and plant materials will be graded as Nursery Grade No. 1 or better as outlined by the Florida ~ ~.J DRAINAGE MH ~ / S~ TOP EL=4.22 ~~li ~11N Department of Agriculture and Consurner Services, Division of Plant Industry "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants", '1 , ~ `~a NE LE.=0.14 Q/// 7th Edition, 1998 as revised from time to time. U~ ' F= ; - ~ / ~ reM #1 3. All planting shall be done in accordance with the Florida Nurserymen's and Grower's Associations approved practices, W ` ~ FND N&D ~j~a I LB 6928 rl EL=4.28 0 SANITARY MH 4. All plants shall be fertilized with Agriform 20-10-5 tablets as per the manufacturers specifications in conjunction with U U ~ 1 NA VD 1988 G~ - TOP EL=4.82 GRAPHIC SCALE note # 5. ~ N I.E.=-3.31 / Il DRAINAGE MH 2a oQ sa o ~o zo +0 5, The planting soil shall be the approximate proportions as follows; 50% sand and 50% organic material consisting of ' ~ ~ J , ~ E I.E.=-3.01 As haft J/ TOP EL=4.30 t, ~ I S I.E.=-3.32 p a ~ -q p III NE LE.=-1.43 native peat, well-decomposed sawdust, leaf mold and top soil It shall provide a good pliable and thoroughly mixed " ~ q ~ W LE.=-3.03 0 _ 2' Conc. Curb r yy ~ I'ry ~ / / SE I.E.=-1.34 medium with adequate aeration, drainage and water-holding capacity. It shall also be free of all extraneous debris, ~ U ~ . -4 4 Asphalt p I / SW I.E.=-1.71 SANITARY MH S 25_9.0----- ~l I I Q / NW I.E.=-1.62 ( ) such as roots, stones, weeds, etc. ~ IN FEET ~ ~ TOP EL=4.45 II II / 8^ PI/C ~ ~ N LE.=-1.04 8" PVC ~.l / 1 itteh = 20 ft. 6, All planting areas shall receive a 3" layer of cypress mulch, which is to be watered-in after installation. v~j Z E LE•=-1.65 ;I - S SOUTH BLOCKED II Conc. & Brick Paving III / WITH SANDBAGS li Asphalt a' III F! rida Power MN / I 7. The plant material schedule is presented for the convenience of the Landscape Contractor. In the event of a discrepancy ~ _](~f~ between the plan and the plant key, the plan shall prevail ' ~d,~ ~I _ _ _ _ ~ R O -L q~ RI H AR G Ilry a Electric I ~ ~MPosrf 4 II^ PROPOSED FO NTAI li Conc. Curb I 8. Plants shall meet size, container, and spacing specifications. Any material not meeting specifications shall be removed ~ Z ~}~u.i Blo Corner I D - +~':f., • ND N&D SPREAD and replaced at the contractors expense. iY ~~C~ A ~ H ~ is~:~,.~s;;'~>~:,-~:';~-r`;.~.:,:..,;., s~ a LB 6707 ..u ,p .i x; •,.'r'., 'onc. Box , ti DRAINAGE MH N ~ . ~ ;:~.:~'a;:,G'•:':'::.:,.;: 5 9 TOP EL-4.01 CS Cross & Bri k Crosswalk ~ NE I.E.=-0.79 Cl r~r.::. •'a~. y,.,. F.:'x"it~+rir.;. d $lgnol C1 ~w;t'*r~' ',,,,f., r.~;,.y;,~ . ~ b.,ir,:~' ,,.,,k,.r 7.: S LE•=-0.77 C1 s ~ ~ p~~ ~ 9. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for examining fully both the site and the bid. documents. Discrepancies z n;: ,Q4:65{~A~~:8~:5 3:1,. E(• .::il. i.. , „?ar.,yoi t~k L{?'t.':~.%;~,.,~" ~y i r lfe G/ a FC ,x4„ L - ~ ; ~',~5;'~ 36 I FND N&D II a in the documents or the actual site conditions shall be reported to the Landscape Architect II'' J in writing at the time of bidding or discovery. No account shall be made after contract completion for failure to report U....I w~ 3 ~ ` i ; ~ , ..4,, ~ I GRATE INLET 4 , / ; , ':,h:; • d' LB 5776 II TOP EL=3.32 C1 s,?``' / ! ~ _ I (Not Used II 4 ~ such condition, or for errors on the part of the Landscape Contractor at the time of bidding. ~ U I, II N LE.=-0.73 'd'>,• 1<` I (0.06 N, D.1 W~ I I S LE.=-0.66 HEIGHT ~ ~.-,Y. Light rn I ~ I I a 5' MIN ~..;i Box II 4 a 10. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for Securing all necessary applicable permits and licenses to perform ~ 4 MULCH 3" FROM sTEMS the work set. forth in this plan set. and the specifications.. ~ ~ i1 iy .i ',~`r m ,y8 II LOT 56 I y f t.;;-~,., ° d' W I Planter II I 1 1 1 MLP I I ~ ~ 1 s~:~ 'S9: m ~ I I 11. Plant material shall be bid as specified unless unavailable, at which time the Landscape Architect W ~ a" MULCH LAYER will be notified by in writing of intended changes. ~ ~ I 1 s:.t:,7.. 1~ I V 100 I 1 v s'r,:Yj~z':.rt:`.' d I w I U P I, I t~y.~lrn "I 1 .'>,';,~aj`" IT 'g;. I PTV 0 0 a I I ~ ~ ^ 12. Any and all questions concerning the plan set and/or specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect Z at 727 793-9888 W ~ 1 i k :,i ~ ~ I I BD y 0 1 / Y ,'.t.,•',t: ~"."'i: . r:r^"•:.: I ~ IC e Q ti I / /U/ / , - :4~ ~~:~''"'";tin; di I 1 . r.;:,;a•; ~ ° I I v I FERTILIZER TABLETS AS / / / / I ~ ' ~~M, I SPECIFlED. PLACE UNIFORMLY \ \ \ \ 13. There shall be no additions, deletions or substitutions without the written approval of the owner. ~ I 1 ~ I //u//f//~ ..;a. , ~ , ~ " ~ " I I 75 I \ \ \ ~ 1 I V I AROUND ROOT MASS \ \ j \y\~~ ~ v:,g,,• PREPARED PLANTING SOIL LOT 55 ro CO (no p ..o: ~ I I ~ 12 I I BETWEEN. MIDDLE. AND \ /\y\~~~//\ 14. The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee, in writing, plant survivability for a period of twelve (12) months from final ~ ~ y/\/\j / \ acceptance by the owner. ~ w (0 00 0 M I I GRATE INLET `C II BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS / / / / / 's v ~ © I TOP EL=2.99 j l \ I I i , ; \ / EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL 15. All dimensions to be field-checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to landscape material installation. Discrepancies shall I 5' MI I~• o a I I E LE•--0,28 I G/ ~TM be reported immediately to the owner. Z W ~ op M. II 3 TO 5 TIME5 WIDTH I ` I ' ° t ~ ~ - ~ " j I OF ROOTBALL I I ~ II GRATE INLET I. i:. I _ I g.. it TOP EL-3.11 SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETI 16. .All .materials .must .be as specified on the .landscape .plan. If .materials or .labor do .not .adhere to specifications, .they will ~ [.-i , I I N LE.=-0.59 'CANTING DETAIL be rejected by the City Project Manager with proper installation carried out by Landscape Contractor at no additional cost. LOT 54 SO ~ I W INVERT INACCESSIBLE N.T.S. Powerll LA a. I ~ BOTTOM BOX EL=-0.52 17. A?I permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications ~ a' T::~:?:; ^ " I w . 5k, 18. No contractor identification signs shall be permitted on the project, except for the project information signs, ~ a Q U ~ 4 II > ~ 19. Existing sod shall be removed as necessary to accomodate new plantings. I' ~ I I Q e g,. I SP I O O C7 y. I 1 I m ~ LOT 53 P I I V rs M 20. Any existing areas that are disturbed during the landscape installation shall be resodded with St. Augustine I I Q 2~ ~r ~ t~~, hr ~ ~~G ~ ss 'S•~ m i ,r td S ALL SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER "FlOrltam". s.~ TO BE TRIANGULAR SPACING, fr sEE PLANT usT FaR (o.c.) sPACwG. 21. The Landscape Contractor will be responsible for the collection, removal, and proper disposal of any and all debris ~ G II ~ s G W a c II Qa O generated during the installation. of this project. a I V ~IY l; ~ t .r ?r- d- r. •tr N h j ° ~ ~II~ RI Q ~ I S ~;y '-~-},S~s 22. All areas disturbed within right of way shall be sodded. ~ Q 9 I ~ ~ Q ~ 1~ ~ `4 ~4 p rj ~ z ° II AR y LOT 52 r ~ ~ s~~ ~ Z ~ "~~•yd~~' I 5 u t'~ ~u ~ 'u ~ ~ L ~f~ ~ ~nn _ ~ 0 1 I c S r.: v ~ f~ N ° ~ I I PTV V 1 ?t ; ~ .f " : , ; o I I 15 h f ~,h ' >Jt to 1$" MIN. SETBACK FOR SHRUBS ~ ~ W & GROUNDCOVERS • ~ - - _ Box Ij AR ;,;tip„ - _ I W IRRIGATION NOTES ~ r~, ~ II O.C. SPACING str ~yT, I I LOT 51 ~'r~°r'° ''a:' 1F~ ",~s1f.: r, W RI ~ I BACK OF CURB/ ~ W BED LINE 1. A. low volume irrigation system, that provides 100% coverage to all proposed ~ U plantings, will be designed and installed by the Contractor. ~ ~ ~ I ::~.~r;,~,'~~:;;a>;.,:;, I PLANT SPACING DETAIL SECTION I p. g., Ii SECTION) ~ Q ,:+..,'I:.,'~ 4,., l I N.T.S. 2. The proposed Irrigation System must meet or exceed all applicable City code requirements. (i.e., Back Flow Prevention, Automatic Rain Shutoff Device, etc...) ® W ~ 0 I LOT 50 ~ `',ti;r>.~;':;; : II y ~ 3. Irrigation system must be inspected and accepted by Landscape Architect ~ o ~ with Nall ::fChc•`;~;;:; • II Q o ~ prior to installation of mulch. Irrigation must meet city code section 3-1203.C w F ~ ~ ° W. II ~ to provide 100% coverage, and include a rain sensor and timer. ~ ~ w ~ LOT 64. z 2158 W(M ° II e a Z o a 4. Irrigation as-built drawings, which accurately and clearly identify all modifications ~ ~ Z (N t Inclu ed) ~ 0 (P) , g, yll d a ° M I ° ' . "d 100.00 ~ &/or substitutions, must be submitted prior to final inspection and acceptance. w w ~ ~ a.. ~ d ~ ~ onc.; ° a II I PRUNE AND TIE FRONDS ~ ~ ~ onc. a d 0 0' w ~RONDS ~ ~ _ ° ~ ° 5. The Landscape Contractor must coordinate the placement and power supply for the a a ~ LOT 49 ~ rn N s ° a I I M co s ° ~ d I I o ~ ~ rn' ° I I irrigation control timer with the General Contractor. 6. The following irrigation system components will be utilized, per each manufacturers' Y m z 93 5 7 a': .d j I FND N&D Forido OT 65 of °D II LB 6707 Power MH specifications. °j i i (0.43 S) FCIR 5 8" i~ / I Toro-Netafim TechLine Self Cleaning, Pressure-Compensating Emitter Line HARDIE - Raindial 6 Station Outdoor Control Timer ~ ~ ~ ~ 6707 I ~ / I LB Richdale - 214APR 1" Electric Valve a a a a rBM #2 Amtec - 10" Round Valve Box. ~ ~ ~ ~ aaaa ~ SET NAlL l EL=4.08 il~ J J J J U U U U ~ NA VD 1988 I I ~ w IIQ TRUNK SHALL BE STRAIGHT AND STRAIGHT AND o 0 0 o O I I: WITHOUT CURVES, FREE OF SCARS, II^ BURNMARKS AND BOOTS BOOTS F SCARS, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I Y I U U U U ~ FND N&D N II ~ O 0 ~ ~ U B 5776 o I I ~ II (Not S II WW o TREE REMOVAL ~ ~ a a W N~WW II ¢ ~ (0.21 E, 0.02 N) I I ~ p~ TREE # SIZE GRADE ORIGINAL _ _ a II 3 Block Corner II SANITARY MH RECEIVED FND N&D II TOP EL=3.93 LB 6707 v II 1 6" OAK ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II N LE.=-2.90 a II S I.E.=-2.88 a 1 6" PALM 112~0~ ~ ~ ° m W ~1~~ ~ ~~r~ Q 50 R W W I.E.=-2.10 / U 5 14" PALM " " PLANNING DEC'AI~(M"r,NT o 0 0 0 S 83'38'09" E ~ - I I FND Disc (M) , ~ ~ L 8'_ Pic 3 16" PALM CITY OF CLEARWf~~ER ~ N „ d z 1 ~ ~ S PS 4573 00 (p) w - m I 10 TOTAL TREES REMOVED o:w>-ur-ozrn o° ~ il~ Q Block Corner iii URLAP, J ,w~ FND Disc ~ 'o I I, 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP, ~ PSM 4573 o v I I^ CONNECTEDIWITH 2 D3N4B STEEL Bl WOODEN BATTENS, > . H 2-3/4" STEEL BANDS. ~ ~ N O d] I I . ~ Z -p ~i Z p W ~ ,t`S~tt~ulgltM,ll~lr; ,,~W~. m to ~ E ~h W (!1 ~ ~ 2"K4" WOOD BRACE 3 I " WOOD BRACE (3 EA, MIN.) ~ ~ ~ ,d`~~f/~~+ ~.m ; z Block Corner Q NAIL TO BATTENS &(STi FND N&D ~ TO BATTENS & STAKES PLANT LIST ~ , ' V , L~ r,D ~ , ~y~ 'pM W'w LB 7240 (3) 2"x4"x3 (3) 2"x4"x36" WOODEN STAKES 14 AR Arecastrum Romanzoffianum, Queen PaIm,10'-12' C.T.H. 4 ~ • ~ _ TILLED AND LOOSENED ~ PLANTIING H 16 SP Sabal Palmetto, Cabbage Palm, (10'-12' C.T, HT.) STAGGERED f ° 1 ~'O ~ W NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL / / ~-PLANTIING HOLE. AROUND 1 LI Lagerstroemia Indica, Crepe Myrtle, 8' ht 4~ U) y 35 LA Lantana Ovatifolia "Reclinata" ,Gold Lantana, 3 Gal.,1.5' O.C. ~'l~, ~ ~~nJ ; y n.. i .vrn -ir 1 IIA 1 AA.....-. L]:.. I .1.. T...1 7 /+..I ~1All L.{ ~ [I n I•~ t"" .)A ~\r"^~:: ~ ;,0: f1~1 ROOTBALL -o muL%ln i /-J MUL%,n LMTr-n LIVI LII IUpt: MUoUcll 1, Dly my I UI I, J VQI., L't Ill. 1.,J V.v. FERTILIZER TABLETS 80 H Hibiscus, Hibiscus, 3 GAL., 24" Ht., (30" O.C.) 14 s~ } z AS SPECIFIED. PLACE \ \ \ \ EXISTING UI EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL 193 RI Raphiolepis Indica, India Hawthorn, 3 GAL., 30' O.C. 75 PTV Pittosporum Tobira "Varig"- Varigated Pittosporum, 3 Gal., 24" ht.1.5' O.C. DRAWN,,gY, 100 VS Viburnum Suspensum, Sandankwa Viburnum, 3 GAL., 24" Ht., (3'0.C.) - . UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MASS BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM MIN. 3 TIMES THE WIDTH OF ROOT MASS. OF THE ROOTBALL CHEM BY: _ ,kEZ ORIGINAL DATE: 02/27/06 PALM PLANTING DETAIL SHEET N.T.S. ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 5 OF 6 ISSUE DATE: 08.10.06 Z'i~ +if \ „ , - 333 , 9 5/8 V Z n.t.s. n.t.s. ~ ~ ~ Cleanout Plug ~ W i€ j a~ _ 3 , ~ ~ U. L Back of Curb a..l; Max. 15' -Min. 4' or Connecting Piece w/integrally p Fire Hydrant Assembly - Edge of Pavement Concrete Pad 4" 10 5/8" ~ U ~ 18 Min. cast Mech. Joint Gland on (Typ,) Thick x 1'-6" Sq. 9 7/8" ~ Q ~ 1 ' " one End-D.I. Rotatable Mech. 24 Max. j ~ ~ Distance Varies Valve Box Joint Gland on Other End. , 6" or 8"- 1 /8 Bend. ~ Q ~ , Length Varies ~ See Note 1 ' ( ) ~ ~ ~ ~ Q r~ ~ z :a , Plug , Valve and Hydrant Tee (See Note) , w/D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint V I.~ M o ~ Giand on Piain Ehd Branch. 0 Mech. Joint , 8" ~ w' M sr a ve ' ' ~ I~ ~ (((¢4 n ~ W ~4~ I , Sewer Main 13 1 /2 z_,;~ N Mech. Joint Valve , ~ ~ `W ONLY APPROVED ~f , Kennedy Guardian No. K-81A CLEANOUT PLUG DETAIL ~ ' Muller Centurion No. A-423 CLEANOUT DETAIL ~ ~ Water Main U.S. Pipe Metropolitan N.T.S. 3! , N.T.S. NOTE: Cleanout plug to be ~ NOTES: 1. On H drants Re uirin Runout U.S. Foundry 7621 ~ NOTES: ~ Y q 9 Restraining Joint (Typ.) or equal. W ~ 1. Steamer Connection to Face Street. Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLOR ARWATER, FLORIDA 2. All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1 /4 Valve Seat. PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRAT CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Z ~ 3. Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street Corners ENGINEERING ENGINEERING N ER NIGISTRATION _ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT W ~ AL HYDRANT piD15 92 REDRA er STANDARD ~f o7 95 Q' Q or in the R.O.W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines BR pBY TYPICAL HYDRANT Ot°15 92 R~ ~Br TYPICAL HYDRANT SETTING mDEB N4 CHEf]{ED 9Y CLEAN OUT INDEX N0. Whenever Possible. aiEacm BY SETTING n~DOt Na a~EacED sY SETTING oES~ai CROSS-SECTION 402 DESDNm BY PLAN VIEW 4. See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections & Fittings. REV. DA,E DESa:~noN AaP. 2 OF 4 °A~ gyp. .AN VIEW U2 w•J•S• Sanitar 304 tom, T.C.J. G.C.H. 3 OF 4 REV. DAZE DESCRIP110N App, APPROVED BY 1 F^ O T.C.J. ~w 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 o A O 0 0 Flow Z ~ 0 0 0 Tapped Flange. ~ " ~ Ta ed Flan e ~ ~ O 0 0 NOTES: 1 Brass Nipples 2 Backflow pp g Ball Valve f ~TYP•) f Preventer ~ ~ Ball Valve O (y 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W., APPROX: 4 FT. BACK OF CURB o ~ ° UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER: Top View 90' Brass EII 90' Brass EII a d+ W 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE. ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE Approved Backflow ~ BYPASS DETAIL W ~ o: U SHEET N0. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. DRIVEWAYS Ford Meter Flange Prevention Device (Flanged) o_ ;d) Approved Backflow SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. Preventer 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED and PRESSURE TESTED TEST FOR ONE HOUR ®150 P.S.I. ( ) Resilient Seat Plate Strainer Resilient Seat OS & Y Valve ~ OS & Y Valve UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE Ford Angle TESTING and CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT` ALL TIMES. Valve (Flanged) Flow 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. Flanged Tee f Flanged Tee 5. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 4" PVC MAINS. SADDLE IS Flanged 90' Bend ~ ~ Flanged 90' Bend „ ~ REQUIRED FOR 2 SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 6 and LARGER PVC MAINS. LARGEST SERVICE CONNECTION TO A 4" MAIN I5 1 1 2" and LARGEST TO ANY MAIN IS 2". o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f Uniflange „ Brass Nipple 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS. TO BE NOT LESS. THAN 36 . Meter Meter f ~ Q • Flan ed _ ( 9 ) ~ ~ ~ Threaded Cor oration Sto Curb Sto P P p c 12" D.I. Pipe ~ H MUELLER H15008 MUELLER H14350 with Lock Wln and ~ ~ 9 v f ~ II ~ w ~ or approved equal g ~ E m Coropresslon Inlet or approved equal a - ' (Tap at 45' Angle) ~ i ~ w _ ~ 12" ~ U ' Supports ~ ~ Q Saddle if Required M.J. 90' Bend M.J. 90' Bend l~ ~ See Note 5 ~ ~ Water Service Tubing Flow H Drisco i e 5100 or Endot Yardle PP ~ Y TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE 1 1 2 and 2 MODELS TYPICAL COMPOUND WATER METER SET ® ~ ' ' Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene Saddle shall have double X, NOTE: n.t.s. ~ W i ~ NOTE: Stainless Steel straps Device must be installed level. 1. 0 S & Y Valve Handles will be Chained and Locked. ! ~ o ~ 2. Meter Sets will be Painted After Installation. - with epoxy coated 3. Bypass Pipe & Fittings Shall be Threaded Brass. w ~ ~ ductile iron bod . CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLOR Y PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION * PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRAT ARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA ~ ~ Water Maln ENGINEERING APPROVED R.P. DEVICES ~ APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES ENGINEERING IS ADMINISTRATION * APPROVED R.P. DEVICES ~ APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION z ° ~ ~INEERING ENGINEERING Q BVDBY Ot°15 92 Hersey-Beeco Model FRP II Hersey-8eeco Model FDC ~~BY TYPICAL METER SETS W Herse Beeco Model 6CM Herse Beeeo Model No, 2 ~ ~ Z METER SETS W DA ~ y REDRAxe BY TYPICAL COMPOUND DA ~ ~ 02 94 Ames 5000 SS Ames 2000 SS M~ 02 94 w w ~ REV. WA1ER SERNCE cNEa~D BY WATER MAIN SERVICE iNOEx Na Watts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or 007 DHECID:D Br BACKFLOW PREVENTERS ~ tx/2z~4 N81NG 7YPE aril CONNECTION DETAIL 401 Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 1 1 2 and 2 MODELS )W PREVENTERS iNOOC No. Watts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or 007 dIECKED BY WATER METER SET ~ ' w REV. DALE OESCRIP110N App. DESGNEO BY 1 OF 3 REV. DAh DESaZIP11DN DEacNm BY and 2 MODELS 'w5 Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 90' RISE iND~Sa ~ ~ _ REV. oA~E oESCR~Pnar App. oma+EO er 3 Of 5 ~ 20F5 See Index No. 201 m 6 4 4 TYP I CAS 1/AL1IE SETTI ~ G Varies Clay Or Cement Brick Masonar THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: At Term'nal y 1. BEND -INLET AND OUTLET I n.t.s. a 3 Manhole 2. TEE -OUTLET BRANCH a E 3. OFFSETS -INLET AND OUTLET ~ Q U M 4. CAPS ~ 5. PLUGS O O ~ ~ m . DEA S I ~ 6 D END / ~ Bottom Of ~ 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS ~ a U ~ o A 3 A Corbel = U N O U N Adjustable ~ W o ~ ~ ~ „ "D" Min. „ d 8 8 L Megalug Restrainer (Typ.) Valve Box ° ORIGINAL N ~ N Or To Suit Pipe L RECEIVED - c o 12" 12" a ~ ~ ~,UG 11 2006 When Valve Occurs in Roadway, 'o PLANNING DEPARTMENT N o ,>E„ set Base on 10-Common Brick. I U CITY OF CLEARWATER ° 6„ • N ~ ~ a z • • Ebba 1500 Series (Typ.) 'C D:W~-N-02N Q t0 S uare Bottom n.•'.0'' a,. .•d.• ..p;.•' .~;..n' L~ N ~ p J o Permitted ao Q ° PLAN - "G" SECTION A A 0 ALL ES A MININUM OF 5' SH L o N TE ALBE ~ RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG ~2 ~ L =MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE ty ~ ' 0 ?l' ~m A B C D E F G RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FlTTING (ft.) S o O'- FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 15D PSI TEST PRESSURE. hall w 4 2 6 4 Max 3 6 24 Max 8 #3 at 12 E.W. 8" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM Water Main ~ ` .a Standard 4.1'- 6' 3'-6" 6' Max 4' 30" Max 8" 5 at 10" E.W. NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE sHALL BE Mech. Joint Valve ~ ; ~L1 'do ~ ti BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT Dee 6.1- 10 3 -6 7 10 4 48 Max 12 5 at 10 E.W. BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 1ST RESTRAINT Restraining Joint = ~ ~c' co~v~~;+. ES 1500 . tL Q 3 ,~'G'~ i~ur ,;r P.. ~ .LI r r,,.,, - nlnr,~ I=I Rnw~ f~Ipry 1 VALVE (Deep 10.1'- 14' 1 3'-6" 1 7' 1 14' 15' 148" Max 1 12" 1 #5 at 10" E.W. ~~vv V ~~vy TEES DEAD RESTRAINERS. 0 PIPE END C SIZE 11.25 22.50 45 90 BRANCH 1?'1:I/I??y 477 U CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA % NOTES PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 4 2 4 9 21 28 46 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLOR ARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA DRAWN BY.-- HAZ 1. All concrete to 3 ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRAT 0 be 000 p.s.I., 6 3 6 12 29 47 65 ENGINEERING ,S ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION IINEERING ENGINEERING CHECK BY: KEZ with fiber mesh reinforcing. BY a o 8 4 8 16 38 66 REDRAW BY STORM SEWER 85 B.V.D M 99 ~ D Y TYPICAL VALVE of DATE ORIGINAL DATE: 02/27/06 I 4/8/02 Rev. Notes R0. d E?OD BY INDEx NO. CHECKED BY THRUST U w.d.S. MANHOLE DETAIL 202 E RESTRAINING REV DATE DESCIGP110N APP. DESIGNED BY DESIGNED BY THRUST 9m 9 B.V.D. SETTING 92 STRAINING , 2 REV. DAME DE~P71ON APP CHECKED DESGNED Y CROSS-SECTION 1 ~pp~OFz4 SHEET • q 1 OF T REV. DALE DESCRIPTION APP. Z D.G.S. G.C.H. - rn c • o 0 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY 6 OF 6 ISSUE DATE: 08.10.06 • INSIDE . OUT 0 , : r------- - - - - - GRD~JP ~ INS. i i _ i • I • BALCONY I 812 LOUDEN AVENUE i snrcortY ~ • I DUNEDIN, FLORIDA. ~ . i wnu, Low i i i i r 34698 I (727) 7~4-3673, , . • ~ ~ i i i i • I• ~ i i i ~ i I i i • LIVING j' • I LIVING j ~ ' . I ROBERT M. V~EIlVIER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ARCHITECT #2955 ~ I • _u p . I ~ r i .DINING I : : tu~r~ of i naru~a LOW WALL BUILDING (ABOVE } BALCONY j KITCHEN I KTTCHEN • I Y I ~ J I: o0 1 0 I I ® o0 ~ ~ O o0 • I • ~ ~ I - ~ ' I~ ~ ' I. p J ~ ~ ' I ® I GY ; ~ ~ I I _ ~ ~ O D j QO . I POOL. - - ~ I ' o ~ DINING ~ o i ~ I I ~ I I I BEDROOM #2 . ~ ~ ~ ` ~ i BEDROOM #2 _ ~ • I I ~ ~ ~ I ! . I I I I i___ ~ • - ~ ~ 0 0 ~ I I I I _ , ~ ~ I I / \ I I I ~ I I ~ ~ . SEECIVII.PLANS I ~ I ~ I _ . FOR PARKING LAYOUT ~ ~ I, W _ _ ~ 'MASTER I. AND DETt1II.S _ I ~ ' I MASTEK ' ~ i ~ ~ ~ I BEDROOM. ~ BEDROOM #3 BEDROOM I BEDROOM #3 , I ' ~ . Q i ~ ~ ~ ~ p i Q ~ D ~ - BEDROOM#2 ~ TRAV ~ TRAV L ' ' ~ i - - - i DIST CE I DIST CE . 123'-8' 123'=8'. , I i ~ ~ ~ ~ it I I ~ . I ~ .COMMONS AREA I . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I~ I • ~ VI ELEVATOR • - - ELEVATOR ~ - - I O 1ST LEVEL ~I 1 ST. LEVEL ELI~CTRICAL I ~ _ _ (E~-EC.) P (ELEC.). L ( 2ND LE ~ _ .METER - ~ ~ DU STER ~ I - - - - - 2ND PLATFORM L (FIRE P - - - MASTER ~ _ BEDROOM ~ BEDROOM#3 . I• ~ ~ ~ ' I y ~ • ° o TABBY I ~ I ier: sn~ LABBY arN; LOBBY ~ , ~ . o - ~ w S # . s # o~ • ~ ~ TRAVEL • S AIR #2 Q ~ STAIIt#2 ~ AIIi#2 DISTANCE 104~_S" 0 a i 64'-10" REVISIONS FLOOR PLAN sixTx L~N~ LEVEL QR?G~NAL RECEIVED GROUND FLOOR PLAN FLOOR PLAN ~sT ~U ~~H L~vnv~ iEV~L SCALE :1/8.. _ 1'-0" SCALE : 1 . i~_~~~ SCALE : 1/8!' 1-0" /8~~ ~l~G 112006 • ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAWN BY ; '~P CITY OF CLEARWATER ' . RATE 13 APRIL 2006 LL~R WIT 1Q'I' • 'hN NLOOR ~ 1f N M.oO1t LIVING CONDITIONED 94m18R POOIPRINT 69m9 8F pOOTpRINT " 4~I9 8F LIVING UNCONDITIONED 99B SF LIVING CONDITIONED 49118E LIVNG CONDITIONED 7610 BF TOTAL AIWA 4144 BF LIVING UNCONDITIONED .1m6 8F LIVNG UNCCNDIIIGMED 91m BF, ' COMMON CONDI11ONEp .--1118F COMMON CONDI11oNED ~ 1118E ' r~ ' _~._.~.a~~.~~~.~.ui-.. use ne.aweati~~NrMlnitlMlen M9/i f4R' ' IIIAW. N WI'll'IVIV WKrVIYVI IIN7GV ~ Ilvv ar, inn Ivn w~ . LIVING CONDITIONED 7610 8F WN11.Oq! Iwo LIVING UNCONDITIONED . 310 8F TOTAL AREA 7980 OF POOTPRINT 6849 8P POOTPRINT 12118P LIVING CONDITIONED 7610 9P COMMON CONDITI QED 1118F; LIVING UNCONDITIONED 310 OF CCMMON uNGOND(IONED 1106 or 1 DE .3 COMMON CONDITIONED - 476 8P ~ COMMON UNCONDITIONED 3561 6E - 1 x I i , : INSIDE',: . ~ ~ • OUT 0 I : ~ ~ GROUP INC. I I ~ , I I I I ~ ' ~ 812 LOUDEN AVENUE BALCONY I I I ~ DUNEDIN, FLORIDA I I , I I ~ : 34698 I I (727)734-3673 I ~ ` I I I I I I I. LIVING I I I I I . I ROBERT M: WEINiER I j ARCHITECT: #2955. - I I I :I . i PERGOLA DINING . ~ , KITCHEN ~ I i. I i. I I : . . ~ o0 I I ~ 0 00 ? ~ I. I I .I : ~ ~ j I i I I I I ~ I i ~ ~A I - I I, : I uv. I ! - . ~ I. I I ~ ~I i~ I VC I ~ , i.. ~ ~ I i POOL - - - ~ ~ POOL L r o ~ . ~ ~ I I ~ ~ . I I N a- ' I ~ BEDROOM #2 I . ~ ~ l ~ . r. I I i e,. ' I i ~ ~ I I ~ .I I ~ I ~ i - _ _ ~ I _ . ~ ~ i. _ ~ I . ~i ~ : _y - - o ~ L I ~ - MASTER cn BEDROOM BEDROOM #3 I I rn I ~ ~ I . I I TRAV L Z_ UI . ~ ~ DIST CE _ ~ - - - - _ -i I i I. I 123-8 I I I I I COMMONS I I .COMMONS I ~ ~ I AREA I I AREA f I I I I I I I ~ i . I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ . I f I _ - = _ - I I STORAGE ~ (~LEVATO Vw2 ELEVATOR I I _ _ - I STORAGE ( _ - - I ~ - I ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I B OM I I B OM i ! ~ I ~ I II ~I it I ~ I:Ij ~ ~ I I II I I II i _ ~ ~ - ~ z NTH IBI ~ . LOBBY ~ Lt~1 I3Y I! I N ~ ~ ~ . ~ I~ I ~ ' . ~=a D.d ~-r=i~- n `r-rr ,I= ~ s # I IIIIIIIII. I I L' .I,~RI I I I W, . C~7 I ~,_.LI~L _ I ~ I u~i.Lu I - ~ S AIR #2 I IIIIIIII I ~IIIIIIIII I. ~ ~ 0 . ~ ~ ' I I ~~~z_^- _ w w ,u 64'_ 10 ORIGINAL RECEIVED REVISIONS , ~~G 112006 : . S EVENTH LIVING LEVEL ~ ' PIANNING DEPARTNIE~ai SCALE :1/8 -1-0 SCALE :18 =1-0 . ~ CITY OF CLEARW,'~TE.; ' ~ . DRAWN BY ` CP DATB 13 APRIL 2006 . . N a 20F3 F HE T POINT TOP 0 HIG S • DURON , ' , , ARCADE ~ , , RUSTICATED MONIER ' 1, ~ ' ' WHITE ' sT[ICCO ~ TOP OF ROOF. _ ~ MADEIRA BLEND , , II ~ , . ' „ ' DURON ~ #7100 , ' CLAY BARREL ARCADE MID OF ROOF TILE . - ~ WHITE #7100 MID OF ROOF , INSIDE 1. 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ • DURON ~ , MONIER O V 1 O ' ARCADE ' • • ,1 ® MADEIItA , WHITE' , ' , • #7100 ~ ; . ' , .BLEND CLAY ~ , DURON • BARREL TILE C,JRV V1 :.'INC. • , , _ - ARCADE _ _ COLUMN . ' , WHITE , - • , ~ , , ~ .PAINTED ' ' , DECORATIVE TRIM #7100 ~ , , ' • PAIIVTED ARCADE ~ ~ ARCADE 812 LOUDEN AVENUE . ' WHITE7100 . '.h1 • wxrrE DUNEDIN, FLORIDA • 1, ~ #7100 34698 "DURON" , , , • , , (727} 734-3673. ' : . RESTRAINED • ~ GOLD SW ~ , , o0 6129 , ' ~ , , WHITE DURON ~ ~ • RES D ~ v, TRAINS ~ . , „ GOLD SW 6129 . " , . m ' . ~ , M •I, 00 , . ~ , ~LJ,, ~ ~ ROBERT M, WEIMER • ~ , . ARCHITECT #2955 ' TRIM , "DURON" , u ~ IVOIItE SW ' 6127 ARCADE , , „ 0 11 DURON , , , WHITE 'a • #7100 SMOKEY , TOPAZ SW 6117: , ' , ; , „ , , .1 II IIDURON"' - DURON - "DURON" SMOKEY SMOKEY . SMOKEY _ - TOPAZ PAZ 11 TOPAZ SW _ TO SW 6 7 6117 - SW 611? ' B.F.E: =12'-0" B.F.E. =12'-0° B.F.E. =12'-0" OPEN ~ ~ OPEN WATER ~ oo \ / FEATURE. ..GRADE = 5' -3.1/2" ~ ~ GRADE = 5' -3-1n" ~o 1 GALE :3/32' =1'-0 ~ "SCALE :313211 = 11-01. _ TOP OF HIGHEST POINT - MONIER MADEIRA BLEND . CLAY BARREL TILE • ~ MONIER MADEIltA TOP OP ROOF BLEND CLAY BARREL TII,E . MID OF ROOF , f vINYL WRAPPED ~ FASCIA • ' WHITE . . ' w _ _ . - - - - COLUNIN - , PAINTED , "DURON" ARCADE - . WHITE #7100- , . ' ARCADE • WHITE , " ~ ~ • #7100 • i ' . • ~ , -~r 11~1~ - r _ _ , ALV lYILL\ U1Y1 II II f„ , r^ , ' .t ~ vJ RAILING ~ DURON , , RESTRAINED . WHITE , , , ~ GOLD . , • • SW 6129 • , - ~ , , . ' RESTRAINED ~ ~ ' if, M Q , GOLD SW 6129 z , ALUAgNUM RAII.ING ~ ~ ~ • , „ • WHITE iv ' • ~ ~ ~ , ' ~ ro ~ 0 I,• , "DURONII. ' RESTRAINED , . • ti , • . , , . GOLD SW - ' • ; ' • ~ ~ • ' 6129 • ' ' ~ ' ~ ~ • • , • DECORATNB TRIM ~ , . , . ~ , PAINTED ARCADE ~ ~ ' ~ . ' , ~ . • ~ WHITE 7100 ORIGINAL W - ~ ~ ' , " ' ; , . RECEIVED a O a a .w ~ . . ~ , ~ . ' ~JG 11.200 , ~ , . , RUSTICATED , ~ . ' ' • STUCCO PLANNING DEpA12TNlE~Ex REVISIONS ; • . . ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ • , , CITY OF CtEARWATER • „ . © STUCCO BAND ARCADE WHITE "DURON" #7100 SMOKEY B.F.E. =12 0 B.F E. =12'- " . ~ DRAWN BY CP . ~ ~ . ~ _ TOPAZ O OPEN ~ SW 611 ~ . ~ ~ ~ , OPEN OPEN 7 OPEN OPEN `DATE $ MAY.2006 . RAE 5 -311 ~o_ , , • G - ~ , ~ nrnnrnn . LEI III I ~l V Y Y y 7 t, { T T" E: WEST ELEVATION. NORTH ELEVATION SCALE : 3/32" =1'-0" SCALE : 3/32" =1'-0" 3 OF 3