The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2006-06034E • FLD2006-06034 622 LEMBO CIR LEMBO COURT TOWNHOMES PLANNER OF RECORD: S -K ATLAS # 296B ZONING: MHDR LAND USE: RH RECEIVED: 06/23/2006 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: INCOMPLETE LETTER -1/ 1 /0? COMPLETE LETTER ?? (? / `()(p MAPS DRC DATE STAFF REPORT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA CDB DATE f p l /? l p`. 0-4 DEVELOPMENT ORDER CLWCoverSheet • • MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board l FROM: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III $? RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2006-06034 / 622 Lembo Circle DATE: September 16, 2008 Attached is information related to the request by Northside Engineering Services, Incorporated, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 622 Lembo Circle. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on October 17, 2009. Pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4-407, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing". The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like". In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed due to a significant downturn in the condominium/town-home market. It should be noted that, pursuant to CDC Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a one-year extension of time. Attachments: ? Letter of Request,, ? Time Extension Development Order (September 12, 2007); and ? Planning Department Staff Report (October 17, 2006) S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationsUnibo Circle 622 - (MHDR) Approver! -W Lembo Circle 622 - CDB Time Extension Memorandum 2008 09-16.doc \') NorthsIde _7 AW 28 August 26, 2008 PiCri ?C '?.1!_ Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director V v ^_ FAR'VVATeR City of Clearwater Planning Department _ 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-06034 622 Lembo Circle Dear Mr. Delk: ._t Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports ;R' rZoning, Land Use, Annexation it Stormwater Management Utility Design Traffic Construction Administration We would like to request an extension to the Development Order issued for the above referenced property. On October 17, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed our Flexible Standard Development application to permit 10 attached dwellings (town-homes) with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202. A one year extension was approved on September 12, 2007, and provided a deadline of October 17, 2008 to apply for construction permits. Due to the extreme downward turn in the condominium/town-home market within Florida, the development team has determined that it is not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. It is our hope that within the next eight months the market will begin to turn around. While awaiting submittal of the documents for construction permit review, we have obtained the required SWFWMD approval. Upon the city's countersignature of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Pinellas County Health Department applications, we will be submitting for water and wastewater permits. We offer our assurance that the development team has worked diligently to move this project forward; the architectural plans have been completed and we are ready to submit once the market is a little more stable. Please accept this letter as our formal request for an extension of an additional one year to apply for construction permits for the Flexible Standard Development application and approval. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request. tfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project Isi?i5u?r Cc: NES File #626 P.O. Box 4948 N. Pelzer Ciearwater, FL 33758-4948 tecli@norchsideengineering.com 727113 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 0 0 C I'TY OF C LEARATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 y MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 * e TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 12, 2007 Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services Inc. P.O. Box 4948 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4948 RE: FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Circle Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: On October 17, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (town-homes) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.F, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (October 17, 2007). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On August 21, 2007, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited a downward turn in the condominium/town-home market within Florida. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a one-year time extension to October 17, 2008, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the building and site improvements on your parcel at 622 Lembo Circle. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • September 12, 2007 Ruggiero - Page Two • through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Scott Kurleman, Planner H at 727-562- 4567x2504. Sincerely, ?1Vl?chael elk, C Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslLembo Circle 622 - (MHDR) Approved -MLembo 622 Time Extension D. O..doc • CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: October 17, 2006 FLD2006-06034 PLT2006-00006 D1 Canterbury, LLC Northside En ing eerin 622 Lembo Circle CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: • REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (townhomes) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.F, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10 lot subdivision. EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential; RH, Residential High Category PROPERTY SIZE: . 0.39 acres; 16,800 square feet PROPERTY USE: Existing Use: Retail Sales and Services (Child Day Care); Vacant Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: North: Medium High Density Residential/ Vacant lot West: Commercial District/ Office East: Medium High Density Residential/ Attached dwellings South: Medium High Density Residential/ Attached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Attached dwellings and a Commercial use dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.39-acre site is located on the west side of Lembo Circle, approximately, 180 feet west of Lincoln Avenue. Lembo Circle is a residential street that forms a semi- Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 1 i • circle west of Lincoln Avenue with predominately attached dwelling uses. The existing building is a vacant childcare facility. It is noted that the existing building is in need of extensive repair and maintenance. Proposal: The proposal includes two town-home style buildings with a total of ten dwelling units. The ed up to 11 site, with a Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) classification of Residential High (RH), is permitt dwelling units (30 dwelling units per acre). Building "A", located on the south side of the site, will have five dwelling units. Building "A" will be located five feet from the side (south) property line, 29.3 feet from the front (east) property line and 15 feet from the rear (west) property line. Building "B" is located on the north side of the site and will contain five dwelling units. Building "B" will be located 29.1 feet from the front (east) property line, five feet from the side (north) property lines and 15.2 feet from the rear (west) property line. The buildings will be 25 feet. four inches in height (two-stories) and each dwelling unit will have 895 square feet of living space. Parking will be provided within a one-car garage allotted to each dwelling unit and one parking spot in front of the garage providing 20 spaces (two spaces per unit). The units will be accessed from a driveway off of Lembo Circle. A new sidewalk is proposed along the Lembo Circle street frontage. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. The buildings will incorporate Spanish style the roofs, stucco exteriors and will be painted with neutral earth tone colors. The proposal includes deviations from the Code including, a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a front (east) setback reduction from 25 feet to zero feet to the trash staging area, a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet to building, and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet to the dumpster enclosure. *Staff believes the reduced lot width requirement is justified by the benefits of an attractive, affordable housing project to the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The reduced front setback is only for the trash staging area; otherwise, the proposed structures are setback greater than the required 25 feet. Existing structures along the same side of the street have been constructed with irregular front setbacks and the proposed reduction in the front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood. The side and rear setback reductions meet the flexibility criteria for Attached Dwelling under Section 2-404.A. I. In addition, the applicant is requesting a reduction to the side landscape buffers. Landscape deviations are discussed below. The adjacent property to the north is a vacant lot, the parcels to the south and east are developed with attached dwellings. The parking for many of these attached dwellings is located in front of each building and generally located up to and in some cases beyond their respective front property lines resulting in zero foot front setbacks. The adjacent commercial property to the west is currently used as a title company. The proposal will likely enhance the area through the provision of an attractive affordable multi-family town-home development with extensive landscaping buffers along the front and rear of the development and within the interior of the site. Solid waste will be provided through a dumpster located on the west side of the subject site. The dumpster will be rolled out to the trash staging area on appropriate days. Note that City of Clearwater Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 2 0 Solid Waste sanitation vehicle will not drive into the site to empty the refuse container; thus the reason for the trash staging area. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal. Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code requires a ten (10) wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage along the northern and southern perimeter of the parcel. The applicant has requested a reduction to this buffer width along with a modification of the required plant material. The reductions in the side landscape buffers are instigated by site constraints, which have dictated the location of the site's stormwater drainage swales, which prohibit the planting of trees in the swales. As a result, the proposed buffer will consist of a six feet vinyl PVC fence with Confederate Jasmine vines. The fence and vines will provide an immediate buffer. To mitigate the loss of buffer width the applicant has applied for the Comprehensive Landscape Program. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code allows the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table shows the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROGRAM (Section 3- 1202.G): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed N/A N/A as a partof the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel pro- posed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape N/A N/A program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in N/A N/A the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria. Specifically, the proposed landscaping includes 14 large shade trees (5" caliper) where 2 ''/2" Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 3 0 0 caliper is required, the installation of 16 Crape Myrtles, and 475 shrubs and ground cover. This palette of plant material will provide immediate visual rewards to the immediate vicinity and community. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-401.1. and 2-402): Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 0.60 0.55 X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.85 0.54 X Minimum Lot Area 15,000 square feet 16,800 square feet x Minimum Lot Width 150 feet 140 feet X* Height 30 feet 25 feet four inches x Setbacks Front: 25 feet East: 0 feet to trash staging area) Side: 10 feet North: 5 feet (to building) X* Side: 10 feet South: 5 feet to building) Rear: 15 feet West: 6 feet (to dumpster enclosure) Off-Street Parkin 2/ unit 20 required spaces) 2 / unit (20 proposed spaces) x -e above 1,11:3clission Under Analy- COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-404.F): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for x development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a x residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infrll project are otherwise permitted in x the district. 4. The uses within the residential infrll project are compatible with x adjacent lands uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a x residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and x function, which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 4 • 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street X parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS: 1. That the subject property of approximately 0.39 acres is located on the west side of Lembo Circle, approximately 180 feet west of Lincoln Avenue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District and the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan Category; 3. Currently the site is vacant; 4. Applicant seeks relief from required landscape buffer under Code provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; 5. That the proposed reductions in the landscape buffers and setbacks will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use; 6. The proposed structure heights are 25 feet four inches to the midpoint of the roof, 7. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this site; and 8. Adjacent uses are zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) and Commercial (C); CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Redevelopment Project criterion, per Section 4-4041; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criterion, per Section 3-1202.G.; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area; 5. The proposed use will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the community; and 6. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 3, 2006. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development to permit a Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 5 • • reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback along Lembo Circle from 25 feet to 0 feet to trash staging area, a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet to building and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to dumpster enclosure) as a Residential Infill Redevelopment Project per section 2-4041. and a reduction to the landscape buffer on the north and south side from 10 feet to five feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G., for the site at 622 Lembo Circle, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum of four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the com- mencement of work; and That all proposed landscaping be installed prior to final inspection by the Planning staff. That prior to building permit, the four foot wide brick paver pedestrian pathway shall be relocated to the south, outside of the limits of the driveway apron and throat. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Resume S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cnseslUp faa• the next CDMLembo Circle 622 - (MHDR) October 17, 2006 CDB -SKILenibo Circle 622 StaffReport.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 6 0 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4567 x2504 scott.kurleman(acr),myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater is June 2005 to present Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 - 1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991-1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. • • • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983 -1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION MBA- Masters of Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414. FR -1 gsl IT G IC , 1... i ? ? N RUS 2 8 Glaf? ? M August 26, 2008 PLANN. -,NELCPMENT bErvic., 1.) Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director CLEARWATER City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-06034 622 Lembo Circle Dear Mr. Delk: Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports ,R?f Zoning, Land Use. Annexation Stormwater Management Utility Design Traffic Construction Administration We would like to request an extension to the Development Order issued for the above referenced property. On October 17, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed our Flexible Standard Development application to permit 10 attached dwellings (town-homes) with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.F, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202. A one year extension was approved on September 12, 2007, and provided a deadline of October 17, 2008 to apply for construction permits. Due to the extreme downward turn in the condominium/town-home market within Florida, the development team has determined that it is not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. It is our hope that within the next eight months the market will begin to turn around. While awaiting submittal of the documents for construction permit review, we have obtained the required SWFWMD approval. Upon the city's countersignature of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Pinellas County Health Department applications, we will be submitting for water and wastewater permits. We offer our assurance that the development team has worked diligently to move this project forward; the architectural plans have been completed and we are ready to submit once the market is a little more stable. Please accept this letter as our formal request for an extension of an additional one year to apply for construction permits for the Flexible Standard Development application and approval. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request. tfully, e Renee Ruggiero, Project Ptar Cc: NES File #626 P.O. Box 4948 N. Pelzer Clearwater; FL 33758-4948 tech@northsideengineering.com 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 EL ytaw+r:rs C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ms. Renee Ruggiero Northside Engineering Services Inc. P.O. Box 4948 Clearwater, Florida 33758-4948 RE: FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Circle Time Extension Development Order Dear Ms. Ruggiero: September 12, 2007 On October 17, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (town-homes) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202. Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code requires the application for a building permit within one year of the date the CDB approved the request (October 17, 2007). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On August 21, 2007, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited a downward turn in the condominium/town-home market within Florida. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a one-year time extension to October 17, 2008, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the building and site improvements on your parcel at 622 Lembo Circle. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" a 0 0 September 12, 2007 Ruggiero - Page Two through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Scott Kurleman, Planner II at 727-562- 4567x2504. Sincerely, J Vchl eI31k, C Planning Director S. -I Planning Department IC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Inactive or Finished ApplicationsUmbo Circle 622 - (MHDR) Approved -SKILembo 622 Time Extension D. 0.. doe Northside ? August 21, 2007 Community Development Board c/o Mr. Michael Delk, Planning Director City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-06034 622 Lembo Circle Dear Mr. Delk: CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL We would like to formally request an extension to the Development Order issued for the above referenced property. On October 17, 2006 the Community Development Board reviewed and approved our request for Flexible Development approval; the Development Order dated February 26, 2007 provided a deadline of October 17, 2007 to apply for construction permits. Due to the extreme downward turn in the condominium/townhome market within Florida, the development team has determined that it is not currently feasible to move forward with construction at this time. It is our hope that within the next eight months the market will begin to turn around. The architect and the mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineers are making the final adjustments to the design for the interior of the building. While awaiting submittal of the documents for construction permit review, we have obtained the required SWFWMD approval. Upon the city's countersignature of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and Pinellas County Health Department applications, we will be submitting for water and wastewater permits. We offer our assurance that the entire development team is working diligently to move this project forward and will be ready to spring into action once the market is a little more stable. We look forward to the completion of this development project which will meet the architectural standards of the City of Clearwater and the current code related to the required number of parking spaces for attached dwelling uses. Please accept this letter as our formal request for an extension of one year and to place this request on the next available CBD agenda for consideration if required. Should you require additional clarification or information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration and assistance with this request; we look forward to receiving confirmation of the hearing date once available if a hearing is required. 4ectfully, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Cc: NES File #626 N. Pelzer Canterbury, LLC N. Ferraioli PO BOX 4948 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4948 TECH@NORTHSIDEENC.INEERINC.COM 727.443.2869 FAX 727.446.8036 i 'z ?. LONG, RANGE PIA,NNING DEVEI.OPMI?N'I' REVIEW 0 0 C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pose Ol;rlcr Box 4748, C1.FARWATrR, FI.oRIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SHRVICI?s BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTu: AwNUIi, Q.EARWA17iR, FLORIDA 33756 Ti:LEPHONI. (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 6f ?? February 26, 2007 Mr. Housh Ghovaee / Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street MAR 0 5 2007 Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-06034 622 Lembo Circle Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 17, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (townhomes) in the Medium High Density Residential QV=R)_ District with a.reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear.(west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-4041, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the. subject property of approximately 0.39 acres is located on the west side of Lembo Circle, approximately 180 feet west of Lincoln Avenue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District and the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan Category; 3. Currently the site is vacant; 4. Applicant seeks relief from required. landscape buffer under Code provisions- of Section 3-- 1202.G.; 5 That the proposed reductions irs the landscape buffers and. setbacks. will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons re-,siding or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use- 6. The proposed structure heights are 25 feet four inches to the midpoint of the roof; 7. There are no pending Code En3:orcezn+-,rt issues with this site; and. 8. Adjacent uses are zoned Mc,d 1i1j: High. Dexisit v (11!QIDP) and Coi:om.rrcial (C) iU!GN OMAN, (;tW;::'!i. x, (.:ovml!:_urUUr?t N1IJUNSON, 0 r,, ,: ;1' Ar'rir:\, i?m pt Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Redevelopment Project criterion, per Section 4-4041; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criterion, per Section 3-1202.G.; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area; 5. The proposed use will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the community. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum of four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the'-proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 4. That all proposed landscaping be installed prior to final inspection by the Planning staff, 5. That prior to building permit, the four foot wide brick paver pedestrian pathway shall be relocated to the south, outside of the limits of the driveway apron and throat; and 6. That all outstanding Fire conditions be satisfied prior to building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (October 17, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time names do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this. approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. MAR 0 5 O A 0 0 Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expired on October 31, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II, at 727- 562-4567x2504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/plamlin.g. Sincerely, Michael Delk, P Planning Director S:'_ 1.7rrrilag DepartmenrlC D BIFLEX (F1.ii)'i ertk:rs cases' 17p (: t'tc ; c,.u (rDB12nd Ave S 2695 Take Chautauqua-H Wall (LDR) 2.20.200'7 C,DB- S find Ave o ,•95 ' %e-delopmer t Order.dnc ??, ? 5 200? f F`,?" «? CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: October 17, 2006 FLD2006-06034 PLT2006-00006 Dl Canterbury LLC Northside Engineerin 622 Lembo Circle ' CITY OF CLEARWATER 6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT / STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: OCT 12.2006 REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (townhomes) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.F, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10 lot subdivision. EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential; RH, Residential High Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.39 acres; 16,800 square feet PROPERTY USE: Existing Use: Retail Sales and Services (Child Day Care); Vacant Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: North: Medium High Density Residential/ Vacant lot West: Commercial District/ Office East: Medium High Density Residential/ Attached dwellings South: Medium High Density Residential/ Attached dwellings CHARACTER OF TAE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Attached dwellings and a. Commercial use dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.39-acre; ;te i,, iota*.ed on the west side of Lembo Circle, approximately 180 feet west of Lincoln Avenue. 1: in-rib is a residential. street that forms a semi-- S, Report- Community Develops.+r,nt noar:^ Uci l: i7, 2006 - Case F'L,D:006-06034 -Pale .l. circle west of Lincoln Avenue with predominately attached.. dwelling uses. The existing building is a vacant childcare facility. It is noted that the existing building is in need of extensive repair and maintenance. Proposal: The proposal includes two town-home style buildings with a total of ten dwelling units. The site, with a Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) classification of Residential High (RH), is permitted up to 11 dwelling units (30 dwelling units per acre). Building "A", located on the south side of the site, will have five dwelling units. Building "A" will be located five feet from the side (south) property line, 29.3 feet from the front (east) property line and 15 feet from the rear (west) property line. Building "B" is located on the north side of the site and will contain five dwelling units. Building "B" will be located 29.1 feet from the front (east) property line, five feet from the side (north) property lines and 15.2 feet from the rear (west) property line. The buildings will be 25 feet four inches in height (two-stories) and each dwelling unit will have 895 square feet of living space. Parking will be provided within a one-car garage allotted to each dwelling unit and one parking spot in front of the garage providing 20 spaces (two spaces per unit). The units will be accessed from a driveway off of Lembo Circle. A new sidewalk is proposed along the Lembo Circle street frontage. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. The buildings will incorporate Spanish style tile roofs, stucco exteriors and will be painted with neutral earth tone colors. The proposal includes deviations from the Code including, a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a front (east) setback reduction from 25 feet to zero feet to the trash staging area, a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet to building, and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet to the dumpster enclosure. *Staff believes the reduced lot width requirement is justified by the benefits of an attractive, affordable housing project to the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The reduced front setback is only for the trash staging area; otherwise, the proposed structures are setback greater than the required 25 feet. Existing structures along the same side of the street have been constructed with irregular front setbacks and the proposed reduction in the front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood. The side and rear setback reductions ;meet the flexibility criteria for Attached Dwelling under Section 2-404.A.1. In addition, the applicant is requesting a reduction to the side landscape buffers. Landscape deviations are discussed below. The adjacent property to the north is a vacant lot, the parcels to the south and east are developed with attached dwellings. The parking for many of these attached dwellings is located in front of each building and generally located up to and in some cases beyond their respective front property lines resulting in zero foot front setbacks. The adjacent commercial property to the west is currently used as a title company. The proposal will likely enhance file area through the provision of an attractive affordable multifamily town-home development with extensive landscaping buffers along the front and rear of the development and within the interior of the site. Solid wa to will be provided tarro:.; !.; a dTac?::lstfyr loca:tt d on the west side of the ::.. ?icct s' itee The dumpster will be rolled out to the, tra.sia staging of-ta or:,. appropriate days. Note that City Of Clearwater C a: P 2006 C'...._ FLEi2Vnt,-0',031 .? Sta.lx Report- :c:nle7!1,1211r' liC .j.?, 31: ., t _.s + ?C)DYf 17 • Solid Waste sanitation vehicle will not drive into the site ,to empty the refuse container; thus the reason for the trash staging area. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal. Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code requires a ten (10) wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage along the northern and southern perimeter of the parcel. The applicant has requested a reduction to this buffer width along with a modification of the required plant material. The reductions in the side landscape buffers are instigated by site constraints, which have dictated the location of the site's stormwater drainage swales, which prohibit the planting of trees in the swales. As a result, the proposed buffer will consist of a six feet vinyl PVC fence with Confederate Jasmine vines. The fence and vines will provide an immediate buffer. To mitigate the loss of buffer width the applicant has applied for the Comprehensive Landscape Program. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code allows the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table shows the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROGRAM (Section 3- 1202.G): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed N/A N/A as a part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel pro- posed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape N/A N/A program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4.. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property ir, the immediate vicinity of the apaarcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed iy N/A N/A the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any specied arc-..1 or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the. area in. which the parcel pr posed_for development is located, i , applicable proposed C olr ;reh.cnsive L,?s.rt isca-7:: Program has bc; :ii ::i t t 3 stent with all .pplica e Y ?e;crf a.I?V the PYr'•t`(}'iFl (?rir.l ::aplrrg, ??nG]".1des 1 r. S., % E1' (:af.[17 t) 7F'1' f, 2» CCitPY _a... .3, j>;` r° (_ r5 iri_ J? }F F, la)}.'e.Ci.Fnt :.Fr . tt : ? • • caliper is required, the installation of 16 Crape Myrtles, and 475 shrubs and ground cover. This palette of plant material will provide immediate visual rewards to the immediate vicinity and community. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-401.1. and 2-402): Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 0.60 0.55 X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.85 0.54 X Minimum Lot Area 15,000 square feet 16,800 square feet x Minimum Lot Width 150 feet 140, feet X* height 30 feet 25 feet four inches . X Setbacks Front: 25 feet East: 0 feet (to trash staging area) Side: 10 feet North: 5 feet (to building) X* Side: 10 feet South: 5 feet (to building) Rear: 15 feet West: 6 feet (to dumpster enclosure) Off-Street Parking 2/ unit (20 required spaces) 2 / unit (20 rp oposed s aces x * See above discussion under Analysis. --A T11T T ? IkT!?T 71 77m7T u u-VTIDYT T'TV !-'MMMPi DT A (Cnr4inn 7-AOd.-Pl- V _ Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for x development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for developriaent as a x residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential i ll project a;.e otherwise permitted in x the district. -_ - -- - - 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with X Lcent lands uses aq ---- . , 5. The development of the parcel proposed for dt.vc'aprnent, as a x rt;sidential infill project will upgrade the, immctl.iai-e vj6r, fy of the parcel proposed for development. -- t . The'design of the proposed residential b #,r:. t? r s k, a form and i . -X function, which. enhances the corr.-m*rnrtti ...1 E ; -rr,tr:i to ! y f I Ci F - . t o n? l ,; e vicinity of the, parcel proposed for develup ri r:i: ? t :. ar ?_ ;r `.er as a whole: - ----- -- - -- - i - -- - - --- - ?. i{'Report-CorrimnnityL?`,vc:l;r ?. t ;- U;.:. , ?0(i6 r2006:E)6034:-:P.age4 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street X parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS: 1. That the subject property of approximately 0.39 acres is located on. the west side of Lembo Circle, approximately 180 feet west of Lincoln Avenue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District and the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan Category; 3. Currently the site is vacant; 4. Applicant seeks relief from required landscape buffer under Code provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; 5. That the proposed reductions in the landscape buffers and setbacks will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use; 6. The proposed structure heights are 25 feet four inches to the midpoint of the roof, 7. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this site; and 8. Adjacent uses are.zoned Medium.. High Density Residential (MR) and Commercial (C); CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Redevelopment Project, criterion, per Section 4-404.F; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criterion, per Section 3-1202.G.; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area, 5. The proposed use will enhance otb.er redevelopment efforts in the community; and 6. Based on the above findings aid lrE?peseronditions, Staff recommends approval of thi:application: SUMMARY AND RECONIMENT-)./ 7 K ,-)-N. = The Development Review Commil.tce rF:,;ievTed the application and supporting materiels on August 3, 7 006. The I'lannang Departrren?, rr .:tz .,;c?..r API Iz. A. -: of ,lr;.c 1 ., xz s_e : ?ecrelo ?rt .z..:: to peYat Steff:2ero;`t:.. Cot3lma,rzty i <;? >>: .. 1, ?;_ rv ;tobcr 17, 2006 _. Case.FID2006-0603/1 'a.fle `: • 0 % reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback along Lembo Circle from 25 feet to 0 feet to trash staging area, a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet to building and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to dumpster enclosure) as a Residential Infill Redevelopment Project per section 2-4041. and a reduction to the landscape buffer on the north and south side from 10 feet to five feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G., for the site at 622 Lembo Circle, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum of four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the com- mencement of work; and 4. That all proposed landscaping be installed prior to final inspection by the Planning staff. 5. That prior to building permit, the four foot wide brick paver pedestrian pathway shall be relocated to the south, outside of the limits of the driveway apron and throat. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Resume A. Scott Kurleman, Planner S: IPlanningDepartmentiCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBILembo Circle 622 - (MHDR) October 17, 2006 . CDB -SKILembo Circle 622 ,4taffReport.doc ;? -- :.,.-:- ?t.,Zl. Co nl?l!Iiiit-yDci:'Jpi)tS.e f.B•?n..?L ^006 ..,_4l'.i':•I.?„00 ^a Cl Page 1 of 2 Kurleman, Scott From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 8:58 AM To: 'Renee Ruggiero' Cc: Kurleman, Scott Subject: RE: Extension Request Question - LEMBO COURT - FLD 2006-06034 Renee - In that case, just submit it directly to Scott who will prepare the item for the CDB's consideration. Thank you. michael Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:renee@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 8:54 AM To: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Extension Request Question - LEMBO COURT - FLD 2006-06034 Thank you, we will hand deliver the information today. Mr. Scott Kurleman handled the project. Thank you again and have a great day! Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 300 Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33756 T 727.443.2869 / F727.446.8036 From: michael.delk@MyClearwater.com [mailto:michael.delk@MyClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 8:33 AM To: Renee Ruggiero Subject: RE: Extension Request Question - LEMBO COURT - FLD 2006-06034 Renee - Shouldn't be a problem. Who was the Planner on the case? Michael L. Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida myclearwater.com r -----Original Message----- From: Renee Ruggiero [mailto:renee@northsideengineering.com] 9/5/2007 • • Page 2 of 2 Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 5:01 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: Extension Request Question - LEMBO COURT - FLD 2006-06034 Good afternoon Mr. Delk: I have an extension request letter ready to submit to you for a project that expires on October 17, 2006. If I hand deliver the letter to you tomorrow, is there an opportunity to go on the September 18, 2007 CBD agenda? Having my extension request hearing within a day or two of the expiration date makes me a little nervous; the next available hearing is October 16, 2007. Please let me know and if so we will hand deliver in the morning. Thank you as always for your kind direction and assistance. Best Regards, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 300 Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33756 T 727.443.2869 / F727.446.8036 9/5/2007 M CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos-r Orrx:r; Box 4748, Cu:nrvvnTHR, FLomDA 33755-4748 MuNu:111A1- Si:im(Ais I3uILDIXC, 100 Sour"( Mvitri.r: Awm;i:, Cu, Jm rl:[<, Roulnn 33756 Tia.i:PHONi. (727) 562-4567 F:\x (727) 562-4865 LONG RVNGE. PJANNING Drvi:ro('an.Nr Rcvii'w February 26, 2007 Mr. Housh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-06034 622 Lembo Circle Dear Mr. Ghovaee: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 17, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (townhomes) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-4041, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the subject property of approximately 0.39 acres is located on the west side of Lembo Circle, approximately 180 feet west of Lincoln Avenue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District and the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan Category; 3. Currently the site is vacant; 4. Applicant seeks relief from required landscape buffer under Cade provisions of Section 3- 1202.G.; 5. That the proposed reductions in the landscape buffers and setbacks will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use; 6. The proposed structure heights are 25 feet four inches to the midpoint of the roof, 7. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this site; and 8. Adjacent uses are zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) and Commercial (C) hr.\.n I111m\lm' 1\1 mm lin.i. Jc .tic ', Cur. :n_wnn+r:r ® Cnri e:. ;\. I'rrer,>e , Cn n. ir: nti:r, r nxu Arrmmm m: Acri0 x I•:,MITM 1:1,,, N N Conclusions of Law: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Redevelopment Project criterion, per Section 4-404.F; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criterion, per Section 3-1202.G.; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area; 5. The proposed use will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the community. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum of four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 4. That all proposed landscaping be installed prior to final inspection by the Planning staff, 5. That prior to building permit, the four foot wide brick paver pedestrian pathway shall be relocated to the south, outside of the limits of the driveway apron and throat; and 6. That all outstanding Fire conditions be satisfied prior to building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (October 17, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. so Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expired on October 31, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call A. Scott Kurleman, Planner H, at 727- 562-4567x2504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. Sincerely, Michael Delk, A P Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending casesl Up for the next CDB12nd Ave S2695 Lake Chautauqua II Wall (LDR) 2.20.2007 CDB- SKI2nd Ave S 2695 Development Order. doc 07/07/2000 09:1-) 14 72 744F,R036 hJ(]RTHSIDE EH13 SVCS,- PAGE 01/66 CITY OF CLEA,RV V A,TER AI' ILICA.'Iym FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, ?.^i Tl_OOR PHUNr (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-06 PROPEWY WINNER'S !kiAMP Y? 7J ft-' /t -Z< L ADORES:; G i? 6 hlr i•6,mtntii f i t'.a i ?nh F.AXNt1 HER ,9 - Y9 dI1 - C: ?,r-'FSLtc:?.h? ri•IAL,€ AIDDRU:S x re l 1?4f'Jh FAX NUMOER : AGLIvr hJt?r,,E ?;-`JJ,? ?I---- ?-i-r????? ? ,.?.?''C/G ?- -`. __.___ Psu7r?i rY?-.,t< J ;,? ?sfL tj 6 C1d} F,4>(iVl - I, the Wilk' tl`00 itu3 a ;,!Y; " r tii ba i I-,f my i.iIowIti: l? .i o Iz> I'+E tf Crrt'Ili; ialV,wll ib ` IC ilUil:PE'Ui iuiityl x,11 Wul; ?; u' d y STATE OF FLORIDA, OOUNTY OF Sw s :ra k) clrl 1 ,mbsrrihe;d befr rE , w 11;1"0?111"111(ff?w -9 3EFF11 Y IZZO Notary Public - :hate of Florida Commission E pires Nov 14, 2009 Commission DD 450540 ionded-By Na nai Notary Assn. f'ourti3ell (i.i) ct-'i f'?' :,f €fie- 01-Mitt Er1IVY 11fai 6YiUd Via Sd.ittmitTisd. The pf-ijiIaiI i " i V t::ar s:4Y"II r;? i_:t:;l:suMCI ?Y if i3 - I t . ' I e:,oor, arch ifact, Ianoscape aruhitact r a n ngineor drawn Us a sic2le not sinallw- 011; i 'i: 'Nit -rld uriaii nisi e4cevd 2 i" X 66" mid hielmi + thu folli;vling information: NORTH f FIF3 OVVJ %C:RLii m it:) t),g ri ; "fr'!'i,F UiNCii?R W; JICi I r iD Fr z 1 I TO bE HeCCll'if:IE17: NAME, AMRF , !)Nr , t'L_ }' i '+tJl R.iKl" k OF THE C+ri .` T);J l'fVz '.n,RihlG'TI-IF PLAT; iGENI'iFT r' i Iiiid CL ,'.Fa.`r >3"i 1 ilt,l( 1I-1kT'r1gE T3FiA:Vtil1•:f,; IS A PRISUTANARY FLAT. L1GAL D[c;<;:R?;?/-ilr;id ?^,_'t'r le tart; 7?i?tr'Y ??dJl, i u-;;.?Ut:^JCY ruC`?flOns, ?i ?7vdiaUi'iltr ANtJ FeFwG[:1.1i?ES; ?:hyTIhJG r.l?x7 PIiDTyC'Ju Yl r;i3t Ii',?C)h.Vlra`r' At•!I1 F quFl,i?hiT9; pkUPO?tCI ;;IT'tF.rT Flri:F.?S; NAME-5, Ad-PRCIPRI1i ! t-,F Af.?.bJID;iF}+; J-i.AT ; ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1',tpe I " W H Br cl).nz & Son Flori 17271 302 9007 rSELL.ER'S AFFIDAVIT 0',...c?•? STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) BEFORE ME, th_e undersigned Seller personally appeared, who being firstdulysworn upon oath, depose and say that: 1. The Seller is the owner of the following property: Lots o and 7, LEMBO SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat book 48, Page 38, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida_ 2 There are no outstanding contracts, either oral or written for the furnishing of any labor or material to the land or the improvements thereon, other than: None 3. All labor, material or services, if any, were furnished, completed and in place not less than Ninety (90) clays prior to the date of this affidavit, and all charges for any material or labor whenever furnished, have been paid in full, and the undersigned have not received notice from any material men, laborers, or subcontractors, pursuant to the provisions of F.S.A., Chapter 713.06. 4. The above property is free and clear of all liens, (including mechanics material men or laborers' liens), encumbrances and claims of every nature, kind and description whatsoever, except for liens of real estate taxes for the current year and subsequent years except: None 5. That there are no security agreements, financing statements, title-retention contracts or personal property leases affecting any materials, fixtures, appliances, furnishings or equipment placed on or installed in or on the property or the improvements located on it. 6. That Affiant has or will pay all charges for water, sewer and utility service furnished to the property through the date of this affidavit bill to the Affiant. 7. There are no a ctions, proceeding. s, judgments, bankruptcies, liens or executions recorded among the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida or any other county in Florida or pending against the owner in the courts of Pinellas County, Florida or any other courts. 8. Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that a transferee of a United States real property interest must withhold tax if the transferor is a foreign person. In order to inform the transferee that withholding tax is not required upon this disposition of United States real property described herein, the undersigned transferor certifies the following: (a) The Affianl is not a nonresident alion for purposes of United States income taxation; (b) The United States taxpayer identification number (social security number) is: Marilyn C. Woodring Social Security NO.:- a7 52 9 (c) The home address of the Affiant/Owner (or corporate address) is: 139;1 Pineapple Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33759 (d) The Affiant acknowledges that all persons named in Paragraph 9 will rely on the above representations and that this certification may be disclosed to the Internal Revenue SenAce by said persons and that any false statements made by the undersigned hereunder could be punishable by fine, imprisonment or both. Under penalties Of perjury the undersigned declares that she has examined this statement and it is true, correct and complete. 9. The undersigned is in exclusive possession of said property, except Lots 8, 9, and 43-47, which are in the exclusive possession of the Untcd States Postal Service under a written, recorded Lease Agreement. 10. Affiant, hereby acknowledges that Attorney's Title Insurance Fund, Inc., will rely on this affidavit in issuing its owner(s) and/or mortgagee policy of title insurance upon said real estate. Affiant further acknowledges that CANTERBURY, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Buyer) will rely on this affidavit in paying the balance of the purchase price for the above property. Affiant does hereby, jointly ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Y F: ? ';y W H Droding & Son Flori (727) 302 96 p.2 v ' and severally agree to indemnity and hold Attorney's Title Insurance Fund, Inc. harmless from any and all loss, cost, damage and expense of every kind, including attorneys' fees, which said Attorney's Title Insurance Fund, Inc., shall have or may suffer or become liable for under its policy now issued, upon said real estate, due to the reliance on the affirmative statements contained herein as well as Buyerwho shall also rely on this affidavit. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT- Dated: April 13', 2006. c INI?RILYt? C. WOODRINO 1 SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 13th day of April, A.D., 2006. I'nnt Name: Hovdard P. Rives, III Notary Public, State of FJ?rrfdia _ Personallyknown_ Producedl.D. Type of Identification Produced: ORIGINAL RECEIVED AYO 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEk • Prepared by and ReturrLto : Howard P. Rives, III Rives & Rives, P,A, 1265 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater. FL 33756 Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Number: 15/29/15/51066/000/0060 15/29/15/51066/000/0070 THIS WARRANTY DEED 11011 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELL{aS COUNTY FLORIDA INSTti 2006146007 0411812006 at 03:45 PM OFF y REG SK: e:DEEDS D RECORDING' 10.00 D DOG OC S1 AMP: $2450.00 Made this 13" day of April, A.D. 2006 between MARILYN C. WOODRING, a single woman individually and as trustee of The Marilyn C. Woodring Trust Agreement dated November 18, 2003, hereinafter called the Grantor, whose address is1399 Pineapple Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33759, to CANTERBURY, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is 1135 Pasadena Ave., South #208, South Pasadena, Florida 33707, hereinafter called the Grantee: (Ydheiover used herein, the lerms'grantor' and "grantee" shall include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and/or assigns of individuals, and the successors and/or assigns of a corporation.) Wltnesseth, That the grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other valuable considerations, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain, and sell unto said grantees, their heirs and assigns, the following described land, situated lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit: Lots 6 and 7, LEMBO SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 48, Page 38, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements and restrictions of record, if any, and taxes for the year 2006, and subsequent years. And said Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. In Witness Whereof, the said Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal this day.and year first above written. Signed, Sealed a Id Delivered in our Pr se Witness P(int Name Ji ness e- Print Name C L.S. M RILY C. WOODRING I ividually and as trustee STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS: I hereby certify that on this day appeared before me, MARILYN C. WOODRING, personally known to me, or who produced identification, and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that she executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. Witness my hand and official seal at the City of Clea ater, County of ne as, State of Florida, this 13`" day of April, A.D., 2006. ' ??\111111111//? Pry NamPublic: S e: H and P. Rives, II 1 `?\Z>?R.... ?Personally known t(/ Plroduced ID: `. 0 ^??SSIONFy .,? 'type of Identification Produced:_ ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION 4- IGG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with aorthside Engineering Serices, Inc. to act as an agent for (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at - (Property Location) PINE LAS County' State of FLORIDA. I Signature of Prop r Owner Print Name of Property Owner A. r -.-i.? ;tii .`?" f?/f f3?+'3 . ,? r; ???"?'_.: rat . Address of Property Owner Title City/State/Zip Code Telephone Number State a_- ? The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this (day 4 n County of 0 QAQ of -?-, 20° 1 by i1 as who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. e Notary Public (Signature) __...TERRI L. CPANE Commission # M1' COMMISSION #;90 142589 P 7,77 _.gusl15.2006 (i, ,.an;,iad Thu Notary FuUiic Undnvriters '+rere•? asrna"'.ivsF_-m•s.+s?Y+a+naaes.;on..v.?.."- (SEAL ABOVE) (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) C N - r / 6tvater 0 Planning Department 'I 00 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 'telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGt,1ED AND NOTARIZED APPt-ICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE OR'GiNAL APPLICATION - Plans and applica!ion are required to IJe collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUt013ER: RECEIVED BY (Staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: --- ----- ----- i I I OR LEVEL TWO SU13PORTING UPrlEtdTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN APPLICATION AND'ALL ? NOTE: WITH 15 SETS F CONJU M COITNII REIIENSIVE LANDSCAPE IROCA. (Revised 03/29/2006) -PLEAS '.I,YPL 0.11 PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202,A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBE=R. PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALI_ owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: j,?'1 r F'`-lit t >~ !! ctW Gr ?... J......r..2 ............ ... CELL NUMBER: ..... ........... .... y ?? F - -- --------- FAX NUMBER: ; '.. f r ... r E-MAIL ADDRESo 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal bi_rildings proposed or develop -d n the parcel proposed for the development. ?7 _ OR b. Tile design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Corprehensive Landscape Program :hall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development undo.- MEium landscape RECEIVED standards. ,...........__ ._.. K1 2?? .. PLANNINGE{°C : s+rt:soli CITY OE CtEARrIWATER X:IClwApplicationsl2.006ApplicationslCornprehensive Landscape. Program 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 • 2. I_Ii;IiTI WG: A.? liyhhn?i irroi,;;seu L,;; I,art of a Ccrri?p?cherisiva Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the tr,siness is •:icsed I ----- ----- ------ 3. COMMUNITY CHARAG'fi R: The landscape treatment proposed in tie Con,pre,hensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. ------- ----- 4. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed it the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the inmtediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for developn;lenI. S. 51,11 CIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN! The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Ciearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. ORIGINAL L. r ;. -._- - ._.___._. _..__ .____REICEIVM..._... ---... - - ...__._....._._.__.,GITY OF CLEARWATER 1 HE LANDSCAPEl IG 1 E(JUO L-Mll t',l fS OF AR-11("LE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS i HE CA SE fv1AY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAIvI, WHICIH SATISFIES 11 HE ABOVE CRITERIA, THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AhdD PERSPEC'I IVES ".11AY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SICINM URE: 1, the undeisirdr:r ri, acklIONle,:do, that ail represertations made in STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS this at'ulicaCun arc; true r,rr.1 :crurate to ti'.e hest of my S__worn to and subscribed before me this&_ day.of I'114lfldge and autlux ze City representatives to visit and A.D. 20 to me and/or by ph fo r-aph the property described in this application. l ,r 1 ?1. L11/? ?- who is personally known has produced it x as identification. YP4 r Irv _ - ? XJ4 :;Sfinature or iy oa,r::r Of r.,ur.. ati,.: r otdry public, o? 9170REEN A: V?{LLIA / My commission expires: Id MY COMMISSION # DD 1 ?o 4 p0?` EXPIRES: October 14, r 1.80(1-3-NOTAR'f FL Notary Serve X:'.Clv., Applications12006 ApplicationslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.c1oc Page 2 of 2 CON/lPRE111?NSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARIZATIVE 11-rojed Name: Lembo Court 'roject Addi-esy: 622 Lembo Circle NL'S l'rojed: 40626 Request.. To allow a reduction to the required landscape buffer along the side (east and wc-.<7t) property line fronn 1.0' to 5' 1. Architectural `l,henic ?t. N/A t}. To provide a landscape plan that is demonstrably more attractive the fbilowing are some of the measures taken: i. The proposed number of trees exceeds the minimum required by code and all magnolias and oaks have been increased to 5" caliper. R. The design provides multiple layers along the front, adjacent to Lembo Circle, which will make a beautiful presentation for the 5tf`e;f-`tSCa17t::. L -1new proposed plantings of b' in height or more, will provide substantial visual enhancement and buffering. iv. The clustering of the palms and cypress trees will create additional depth and richness. .2'. €kttrdl : 14o outdoor lighting is proposed at this time and any future proposed light. will wic t required code. 3. t:'amY innity Charac:tcw. '-fhe proposed installation of over 500 new plantings r;onsisting of '9 difft-runt. viirie.lies will provide immediate visual rewards to the and come-min4y. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping tl,iit is till ttt"li ti flue Florida environment. I. f' ,,lye dt' Valoes, The number, size-, quality and design of the proposed. plantings will ofte-r upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity. Is. ESe;;.ibh1 A. rcu ,?r° Scenic i:orritlor Plan: N/A 6-29-06, -- R-MR!insr raL,"•, 626 ORIGINAL RECEIVED t;1yr, 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER n cleamiTater • Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 f=ar.: 727-562-4865 ? SUBtv1iT ORIGINAL S'C f,JED AND_l?OTARiZLI) AP PI_ICAI'ION ? SUBAi!T',4 COP!E> OF THE ORIGINAL A13PLICA'! IOV - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets J SUEN11T APPLICATION FEE CASE ta: _ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DA-1-E RECEIVED: _------__--- 'i` NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) Resident.ia-1111.11ll Project. (Revised 03/28/2006) -1-'L1±.,XSE TYPE 013%. P1Z1N'I'--- A. APPI.IC: ,t!'f', PF?C)I'LF?1"f c )i?J1a1L:fZ /1ND AGENT INFORMATION: (code Section 4-2()2.lA) APPLICANT NAME: l .ill l 1t t 1 it {.''\q r MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUt'IDER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL o:i mc; as c,; AGENT NAME: " t ,tt,t...?.!.r.t'.'? ...?'..?.y.l Y-'.ti (.?.f t_...._ .....__... ......_ .... MAILING ADDRESS: ! PHONE NUMBER: "3 FAXNUME,ER: ?`?. CELL NUMBER; E-MAIL ADDRE:'iS. ? i \1 ,,. Y P r t -? t t ?Ir(. J r:.'r L 1- ?, ?. s'at ?.?..F 2+ ? B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NA!vtE: PROJECT VALUATION: y fit) ?. C c _ /....._ STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): ) J ? { :(,.r 7(% r' f t% rtCl JIUIr'?ri C %(rf?? C ..... .„, ., . .. , . PARCEL SIZE (acres): (ARCr_L SIZE (square feet) f (? 1if a l ° LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ',t.? _'_... - PROPOSED USE(S): C,)? I t? -A' 1 <( a r\ .. - -,` ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST J. .......__ _ ..... - REGEI1iEp Specifically identify the request include number Of units o 41 ]J 0 3 footage of non-residential use and a!I . __L requested code dev anon,,: e c;. PLANNIN reduction !n required n,n ber of parking spaces, specific: use EfC.) .. _.__.._,a..,....._____??.. .e_-.r.-?.,_.,,,?.-.-?..,.......-. G DERW CAM .. ciry0^- E ?N1' /:.[-,AppGritioost200c" lppocaiions\Residontiai In6ll Ppjr. rt (FI-D) 2003.boc i'tgc I of R DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE T RANSPER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDFZ), A`?'REVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY A; PROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN'? YES NO ?( (if yes, attach a coley of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ZSUBMIT A COPY OF TH TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D, WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-013.A) 'T' Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detaii: 1. The proposed deveiopmen,t of the ;and will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. pct' t 2. The proposed development will not Binder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value therr,,,f. 3. The proposed deve,opment will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. .1 _ i - 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion, I ......... -. _ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. - ----- -- --- - _.......... _ 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. r A,#. .._.. 0 G1NAL RECEIVED /,?Ju 0 3_.2006 PLANNING DFe?eoT.. :Applic tlo,s,200& P.pplica:Fons\Resider•.tia'I. I1)611 Proiect (FLD) 2006.doc :'8ge 2 of8 • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ,/Provide' complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFIL.I_ PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of'the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. j 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements,) , 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. ?r it. The uses or mix of use within the residential infiil project are cprnpatible with adjacent land uses. ...... 5. The design of the prnposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the c:omrrtunity character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of C'earwater as a whole. f? .---- .... _ _ ....... 6, The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development end the City of Clearwater, as a whole. . ........... .. ....... _.._ ....... . _.._.._ 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel ptoposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ?.atCC f 3 la t j t 1,;( t.'.(..(' ._...... _ .............. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF.CLEARWATER x:ACi,v ApplicaI!ons12006 Appiicalions',Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doo 1?arte 3 of R • E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Uesign Unterm Manual and 4-202.A.21) /A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildinc,s, must include a stornwater plan that dernonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A; eduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ?!f a plan is not required, Il e narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. W/ At a minimum, the STORIMWATER PLAN sire include the following; fj/ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ii./ Proposed grading Including fin;shed floor elevations of all structures; D/ All adjacent streets a,id rnuni(;,pal slonYt systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to dernonstrate compliance with the City n.anuai. Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Gl"'- Signature arid seal o` F'orida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PER.MI- iNOUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGE NIENT DISTRIJ T (SWFWMD) PERlvlll- SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approve! is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable -? t r ' ? t T/ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): V StonrvMter plan as not(5d above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is atlached. At a rninimutn, a grading plan ,rid finished floor >nS_I C?... eievauons serail be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A ST0RmVVA1JZ-1i PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT I)EL,AY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions reg<:rding these requirement s, contact the City Public Works Administration Engin?°.e:ring Departmental. (72?) 502-4750, F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Cade Section 4-202.A) SIGNED A, 0 SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original arid 14 coplps; 1Y TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and ind`cating tees to be ren?oved) - please design around the existing frees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisl", of all trees a" DBI-I or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; C4 LOCATION tvIAP OF THE PROPERTY; /TkPARKING DEMAND STUDY in corijunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (le, Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approver, by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; / GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); COPY OF RECORDED P,-AT, as applicable; /?/?ZD? VKK7i1VHL RECEIVED mL U 0 3 2000 X' G:v Aprniceticns:2006 App IcaUo^s'.Residandai inrdl Project (PLD) 2006.0oc PLANNING DEPARTMENT 11 agr. 11 11f8 CITY OF CLEARWATER G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the fohmving inforrnatior (not to exceed 24" x 36"): fndex sheet refnlencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; V All dimensions; Footprint and size of a ;I EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; U/ All required setbacks: i All existing and proposed points of access, t/ All required sight ti,angfes; Identlff alion of environment,' y unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and :pc;clrrr=n trees, including description and 'ocafion of unre,story, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and piivale easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas z .,and water lines; All parking spaues, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; ............... Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required patking lot interior landscapes, areas; Location of all solid 'waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equiprnent and all required screening k% (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); /-Location of all Landscape material; Loc.:atlon of all onsite and offsite storm-water ITIanagement facilities; ocation of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and r?i1 l E ,(y% C{l U r>rl_:+? ? 1- 4 er?1 i `, f r '7 "l ' - r `? a !/ t-_orration of all existing and proposed sidevdalks. -d?' SITE DATA f ABLE for Px. stinc), required. and proposed development, in written/tabular form: {? .s ? j 6= {.?` ?''•- ? ia?F)?? EXISTINq REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EX SING, dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling un ts; i Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Tutal paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, ?% exi.rressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility `easement; j C i/ Building and structUrO freights, .......... f mmpenneable surface ratio and Floor- area ratio (F.A.R.) for ail nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); k?,FOR DEVEI.OPJMIENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot conto,m or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater managernent for the parcel;. All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining wars and earth berms; j Lot lines and buiid ng lines (dimensioned); ~ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; ORIGINAL RECEIVED AI IQ 0 3 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER XACi•,v Aapli; al+cns\2006 A;.r,I:caLOns,Resio?ntial In;dl Prn;e.c! (FLU) 2006.aoc Pugs 5 of s • H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4..1'102.A) ?f LAN SCAPE PLA! i with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ?AII existing and proposed structures; ZNames of abutting streets; Ui Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; V Delineation and diruensfons of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; r.l Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing tre!is on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required 1 / tree survey): vocation, size. and quantities of all existing arid proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant ? schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all V existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical pianhng details for trees, paims, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, 5011 mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; v Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both sr,i.rare feet arid percentage covered; Conditions of a previous developnient approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);X ] igation nates. I i ,'3' REDUCED COLOR LANIDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8/2 X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed rnin'inwill Code requirements to offset the areus where minimum Corte will not be met. I. BUILDING Et_EVA'1'ION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) 3/ BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; i Ail sides of all buildings; ?` fj?irnensioned; I /,Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); .-L/,Colors (P; ovide one full sized set of colored elevations); f%4 Materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -- saute as above to scale on 8 12 X 11. J. SIGNAGE; (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) r All EXISTihJG freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. t All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) 1 Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ?r Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if s•_ibrnitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ORIGINAL 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER XCIr: App!'ceGpns\2006 AnptictarionstRe;i:!ent:.a! hrG!I Project (FLU) 2606.doc. Pad!; h 0 r8 0 0 R. fl AFFIL 11`01"Ai T 5 UDY: (Section 4-202,/,13 and 4-801.C) !nclu<ia if c< r.,uirc:r! I, tau rijflc r-ipeir,liols ' 1ara;(?:r or hislher designee or if the proposed development: Will o,-gra::e b,r; :,,;:,::I;!ahle iev,e; of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. VV 11l enerite 1(d; (,r Inure nevi vehicle riirect onal trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will effer.i nr:arr;y fcadvway segment and/or Intersection will) jive (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or If?el (u; the (Aty s a1.11uai list c,f rncst hazarc!ous intersections. flip gene :ur;n shall IlV i:a9Cd on the most ruceni cdit'.on of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. , The T rafnn, ;inp;?c! Snu1y utust pe prepared ;n accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Depeatn;e.:1 ; r.,c;Iopn? :i,t r evie,..; tviaaager or their designee (727-562-4750) }refer to Sermon 4-f.01 C of flee Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgem?rit of uaff:c Impact st,,dy regc„rernents (Applicant must initial one of the following): r?) 71 r ffic: !wpact ;::turfy is included. Tho study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all ro2dv"ay iegs t.lno each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. .............. .. r . raff'c Impact S=tudy is not required. Ci . CAUTIOI',I -- 1F API-11.I A-[ ION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT :i•"I`I)r)'f AND NONI° HAS RE EN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGN IFICA11T DE=LAY MAY OCCUR. If you have queslioir re(;c; (zing these requiren-ienis, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. t_. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations, b"Jat:;r Sludy by a FIRE PRO", ECTiON ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are require, b; l hi,- developer due to the Impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire slxinider, standpipe; and/o; fire pump. If a fire pull p is required the v,ater supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2001 Floiida File Prevention Cor.le to inaiilde NFPA 1:3, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. j/ v a Acknowledgement of r,ins flow ca („1,alions.rdater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): ORIGINAL RECEIVED Fire Flovv CalculationsNVater Study is included. 0 3 206 Fire- Flow r:aicuiaiionsA?"later Study is not required. I, the Unde!'I' ned, a(: ,,owls lrle thai all reiireselllatior?s blade in this appli(I-10011 an( tnic: and aoccuatc= to the best of my kris I geIruI autiio:i,,e CJty representatives to visit and pht, rap( i!,o properr; des?rihecl in this appiic. ,tinn. i y ? of prn e(t; vr.n :r O (p ,:,;.nt.3tl.e f'i' y,lr (;AUTION -- IF API'LIC.«fIC}N REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR AFIRE FLOW PLANNING DEPARTMENT (?ALCIILA"f IC?P1rr/ 4?1/?.TCE; STI1Dl' , tJE) NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST C N OF CLEARW TER RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have question:, r,,gurdin these requin:ments, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIN t-AS Syrn to and subscribed before me thisZL day of A.D. 20V&, to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as identification. DOREEN-A.-WILL AMS i!aly public, i? My commission expires: /Q /V at, y 4 MY COMMISSION # Ot 155802 rFOf i EXPIRES: October 14 2006 X ;, App!c:,t,c,,, 2008 P.pp!ications',Resident ' ai In ill Project (FLU) 2006.doc Pabc 7 of 6 Inc. 05/10/2006 13:50 727an68036 40 IVUI: I FI':J A IJI_ t_I't1:1 !7 V lq AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Named of all property owners on dcod -please PRINT full narnes) 1. That (I amlw(, 3rD) iha owner(s) and r©COrtl title holder(s) of the following described property (oadrsaa or ganaral location): 4e_yrl 2. That this property conslifutea 1h properly for which a request for a: (describe request) 3. That 1hg undsrsign9d (haslhsve) apt>ointed end (dons/do) appoint as (hislthelr) agaril(r, to esocute any petitions or other dacurnonts necr 'my to offeat such pelillon; 4. That Ihts affidavit had been executed to Induce the City of Cleanuotor, Florida ta'cunstder and"_eat uh, the ahtrve described prupfitly; 1II 5. That sits vlob to the property are necessary by City representativos In order to prncos t Is eppllc,,Jon and tho owncr autttariar?s City representetiven to visit and photograph tha property described In thl9 appl(vellon; 6. `hat (Vwa). the undar%Ignad Authority, hereby certify that iha forogoing is live and cc el. t?rapetrty ow er _ .• .. .. __?_._..._..__ rq J' Fmper4y a?n ?.?-? t S'X'A'rF, OF FLORIDA, . COUNTY OF PINELLA5 9 fore B llio u dertFi d, an officer duly romrnisslon is b Hilt Iflwt? s me of Fi dja on this of ?1.? 7l-pamnall y appwvha haaAn.g been first duly morn hst ne(9he fury understands the contents of'the afTi IA (flat he/st;a nl nesl.V \ 1 ar?lr v \>? i!dgllsly ilutfiic e? DOREEN A. WILLIA My Commission ExplroE 1 ` MB ? my COMMISSIO ION # # DO DD 15-5602 a,.?-,.?.,.??wm.?._.__..-._....., .....,_..___. .,,,^.. 1",jO0 3-NOTARY FL Notary Service & Bonding. Inc. TIT ORIGINAL RECEIVED S:1Plaming OCpnrtmxnrlApp11v.glorr Fomnsidevelupmont wfatviRexlbla dwatoprnenr camprc/iDm v,W111 sgptllratlen 20115.400 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEAR1A1,ATFP Page 7 of 7 a Fle dblc bavetoprtient Comple,ianslvc in(iil llt.ipiic.nurin x0t)3a City or ciazin,4afar i ? Exhibit "A" to Flexible Development - Comprehensive Infill Application Associated Preliminary Plat - PLT2006-00006 ORIGINAL Project Name: Lembo Court RECEIVED Project Address: 622 Lembo Circle A.M. 0 3 2006 Northside Engineering Project: #0626 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Flexible Development approval to raze the existing 2,200 square foot day care facility and redevelop the site with a townhome development consisting of ten attached dwelling units with reductions to the side (north and south) setback from 10' to 5' (to building), and reductions to the rear (west) setback from 1.5' to 6 (to dumpster enclosure). Comprehensive Infill approval for reductions to the minimum lot width from 150' to 140' and a reduction from the front (east) setback from 25' to 0' (to trash staging area). Additionally, a Comprehensive Landscape Application is also being requested to allow a reduction in the required landscape buffers in the north and south side yards from 10' to 5'. GENERAL APPLICABLE STANDARDS (Section 3-913.A): I. The proposed development will be in hannony with the surrounding properties as the subject site is surrounded by developments of similar scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The surrounding developments are located on sites of varying sizes and area, therefore, the number of units vary from site to site. However, the scale, bulk and coverage of the surrounding sites are equal to the proposed development. The proposed density is less than allowed by the Community Development Code and is appropriate for the amount of land being massed. The area is comprised of primarily two story buildings containing anywhere from seven to twenty-four attached dwellings. There is strong development pattern of attached dwellings established on the street and the proposed residential development of mid-rise construction, providing two story dwelling units with an attached one garage will be harmonious with the established development pattern and character of the street. 2. The subject site is located within the Medium High Residential Iistrict and is in an area comprised of primarily multi-family attached dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with the Medium High Residential District classification. The proposed development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Medium High Residential District and. actually provides fewer dwelling units than permitted by code. Upon completion, the proposed development and the subsequent site improvements will substantially increase the value of the subject site, thereby providing a positive influence on the surrounding property values. 0 3. The proposed design of the development offers positive health and safety rewards to the neighborhood by providing green yards that are not currently present on the site and provides a new and improved structure that meets current building codes. The proposed site design provides a parking plan that deletes the current undesired circular driveway which requires vehicles to be parked within the required front yard of the site; by providing parking interior to the site with fifty percent of vehicles being located within garages. The design will provide improvements to the streetscape by offering a green yard that is well landscaped and the proposal provides for responsible site drainage which will better serve the community as a whole. The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood and is permitted in the Medium High Residential District. This project is a joint effort between the developers and the Housing and Economic Development Department of the City of Clearwater, the proposed development will provide much needed Attainable Housing for the community. 4. The proposed development and site design provides largely improved and decreased access to the site by providing a single driveway system allowing on-site circulation. Many of the surrounding sites require vehicles to back out into Lembo Circle, the proposed development plan will allow for on-site circulation. No traffic congestion is anticipated as a result of this design. 5. The proposed residential use is consistent with the corrununity character as the majority of the surrounding sites are developed with two story attached dwellings. 6. This proposal minimizes adverse effects on adjacent properties by providing parking that is internal to the site with on-site circulation, by further providing attractive architecture and well designed landscaping. The residential nature of the proposed development in concert with all of the proposed upgrades to the site and building will provide benefit to the adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA - COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT (Section 2-404) A. Attached Dwellings 1. Side and rear setback: a. The proposed site design meets the access requirements of' the hire Department; emergency vehicles will have the required access. ORIGINAL RECEIVED l;lJG 0 3 2006 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER b. A minimal reduction to the required rear yard setback is being requested for the dumpster enclosure; the enclosure will be located at the rear of the site which abuts the rear of the adjoining commercial building, no negative effects are anticipated. Additionally, the proposed enclosure and landscaping will further provide mitigation. The requested side yard reduction allows for parking that is internal to the site with on-site circulation. Further, the design affords the developers and the City of Clearwater the most reasonable use of the site, providing for adequate living area, storage/garage and number of units for the site. The proposed two story design requires a bit more land area than the same square footage in a three story format; however the strong character of the neighborhood and the Land Development Code calls for a two story development. 2. Height: An increase to the allowable height is not required through this development proposal. 3. The District Designation of Contiguous Parcels: The parcel is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 4. Off Street Parking: The site plan provides the appropriate and required screening of the off-street parking. 5. Waste Disposal. The site design provides a dumpster enclosure at the rear of the site with roll out to a staging area on scheduled days of pick-up. 6. Front setback: As required by the sanitation department a trash staging area has been provided at the front of the site and requires a reduction to the required front setback from 25' to 0'. The buildings require no deviation to the required front yard setback. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA - RESIDENTIAL INFILL PRO.IECT (Section 2-I ALF) . 1. The site's location within a well established multi-family neighborhood makes this property unique and perfectly suited for this proposal of much needed Attainable Housing for the community. The proposed two story design makes the most reasonable use of the site; provides for adequate living area, storage/garage and a reasonable number of units for the site, while maintaining the character of the neighborhood. Other sites within a strong multi-family neighborhood are not readily available for development within the City of Clearwater that would more appropriately accommodate this development 2.. Per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the existing just market value of the site is $183,500.00. Upon completion of the proposed development site, it is estimated to be valued at $2,320,000.00. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3. Attached dwellings are a permissible use within the Medium High Rcsidcntial District of the Clearwater Community Development Code. 4. The proposed use of attached dwelling units is compatible with surrounding land uses as attached dwelling units are the predominate use along Lembo Circle and the general surrounding area. 5. The surrounding area will be upgrade by the proposed significant improvements inclusive of the architecture, the residential use, on-site parking, professionally designed landscaping and on-site retention. Through this development proposal additional investment and interest in the immediate area is anticipated. 6. The proposed development will provide improved foi7n and function by providing: a use that is compatible with the surrounding and adjoining land uses and the Medium High Residential District regulations; a site design that promotes benefits such as the establishment of green yards with prol:essionaRy designed landscaping, parking that is shielded from the street and is interior to the site with on-site circulation, establishment of a retention pond to provide improved site drainage; the neighborhood and the City as a whole will benefit by receiving an attractive building with well articulated elevations which provide architectural interest, and a building that meets or exceeds current Building Code. Additionally, the new multi-family structure together with the subsequent site improvements will provide increased value to the surrounding property values. 7. The development plan offers ten townhome units. The proposed building setback to the side yards are within the allowable flexible standards and did not trigger the need for a Comprehensive In-Fill. Further, the minimal 10' lot width reduction being requested under the Comprehensive Infill. Section of the Development Code will allow this much needed development of Attainable Housing. Every effort has been made to make the best use: of the site while remaining in balance with the surrounding sites and uses, the target owners and the Development Code. The proposed development plan provides a building and site design that is sensitive to the intent of the Clearwater Community Development Code, the character of the neighborhood as well as the community's needs and the developers. RMR 8-9-06 NES #626 Lembo Court ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 07/07/2006 09:52 K ?r 7274468036 NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS PAGE 01/06 CITY OF CLEARWATER obod, APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2n° FJ•OOIz PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 56241865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME C l9 A, T? ?L 1J IL'? L ?, C- ADDRESS f I .Ts? S 6 ?! sTe Op S'T ,pk s 2K U/r. , Fc. 0iZJ pa 337 0 7- PHONE NUMBER 72 7-.?0 Z -- S'O d 7= FAX NUMBER : 70-7 - 34 2. - ?Q O APPLICANTS NAME ,5?31? e .d l f9 S D v' e ADDRESS Jpd.r B S T / o J0 PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER AGENT NAME -7?/T13U 9 jWC?C/?J'G S' IIUG . ADDRESS 7?Q So Vas P H00v -is i 4 /-ft-e- y 1. PHONE NUMBER 7Z 17- q5F 6 S ? Lt--FAX NUMBER : ?Z? 4'??-4(, -FRCP J I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL&AS representations made in this application SWAUD to an subscribed b re a h' 1+r" are true and a t to the best of my knowledge. A. ., me an FF 111110111 Y IZZO who is personally known to Notary Putbfic State of Florida y Nov 14 201 1ores r s cod Commisslorl DD 450540 s id ti By Nab Notary Assn. sal Ignature of er or representative N u co mi i n l[L J T J Fourteen (14) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shalt not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: '" ARROW, SCALE AND DATA?: / vl T , UNDER W41CH THE PROPOSED PLAT G TO BE RECORDED: ?NAME, ADDRESS AND TELES'FpNE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING 71-4E PLAT, IDEN NATION CLP.ARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION. TOWNSHIP AND RANEE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS•011-WAY AND EASEMENTS : Uj W ? PROPOSED STREET NAMES; 2 NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSMONED, OF ADJDINIW PLATS: O .+ p N > tn Z r-I U pc Z0 Pepe I U a I? Clearwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINAI- RECEIVED JUL 0 3 206 PLANNINGTM T CIOF CLEARWA ER * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 03/28/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: .............. .I 135 ...........a...._..._ P.. gad - -- PHONE NUMBER: / CELL NUMBER: 2."]?...3_Q.'z....'900.? ........................................._......._ PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: LL FAX NUMBER: ......................... .-_-...._.._.__..._....._._....-.F ..... X...?1..."..a1...D..ip L 7?._2_q - - EMAIL ADDRESS: ej le s fl,$1112C B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: MkO bhp Vy% e?- PROJECT VALUATION: -$ 00 STREET ADDRESS.. ---- PARCEL NUMBER(S): ._....._1...5......2.-°f._._?5....?1.0_?Cv..Q__.o_Q_... _ ___._.p_.___.____ PARCEL SIZE (acres): .?.? PARCEL SIZE (square feet): l ?t R(7(7 . ........ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: fOP n 1-/ Onl Cr?s?IPAI PROPOSED USE(S): DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ?-o X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Wit Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page I of 8 /' DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ?Q (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. ............. _.... See A?c<? d_ _ .. -11 1 11 _ __.____ ................_..._.__-_..._..._._...................____.........._. _.._._ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. LL . ._ . _ .......... ................................._..__._._...._.--..... ....................... _....... _..... _........ _.......... ....... _..__.......... ._..__......... _.__..._..... ._...... .... ..__...._........ _.._.._ ----- -- .e,.........??C. . . ...d .......... .._ ._ ....... ....._.. _ ...... _ . 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. A ..._............. ..._-......__._....._...._ .__... {-G?. _.____..----------- --------- .._._.__..______.._-__..__._...--___.._.-.----_.._.__.. RECEIVED ..... ................ ........... _.._............................ ..._........ __....... ............ _....... ........... ._._............ ._.......... ..... ---._.......... .._.. _.__....--..-_.:-...._....------- -- PLANNING DEPARTMENT X:\Clw Applications\2006 ApplicatlonslResidenlial Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 2 of 8 0 0 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) '-7' provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. A 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise pgrmitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are cgmpatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater, as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and tf e City of Clearwater as a whole. ORIGNAL PlMt4IN C CITY L TWA ANT X:\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) /A A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. Alf a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; r A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with tl the City manual. i Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRI (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable r0ak 6,C) I"1 R' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included ?- Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) i SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; Lle LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; #A-PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; A PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ?IP COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; /-:>1tep1, -4p (jam 4-11?G> >?L?thcy aL ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 X\Clw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 4 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER • • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): V ? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; 1l' /North arrow; gineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; t All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; V (/ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; ' ?V' All required setbacks; V-"All existing and proposed points of access; V*"_ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including V/"? description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; .................. Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas ??/and water lines; V All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; a-r_ `...... Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; / ,Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; lle? 1/Location of all landscape material; v, XLocation of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; I, / _LL j&ocation of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and NpY?2 e f gp05?J' a'? +T iS 14Y"e , '&O Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: vl?,_ Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the V ? _ number of required spaces; /? Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, V ? _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility ,,'I- easement; ,,Building and structure heights; mpermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and f 1 Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); .O?FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); . .... . ... .. ....... Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPART1V16...qT CITY OF ('1 CAI-. _ - EXISTING on C ? . REQUIRE &7?^ T44 le. PROPOSED See. 6..us_. ?`-,........-_.. XAClw Applicalions\2006 Applications\Residential Infll Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 5 of 8 • ., • H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) 7 LAN SCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and reten ' as including swales, side slopes an bottom elevations (Delineation and imensio all required perimeter landscape b ers; _1,/Sight visibility triangles; / Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ocation, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; / Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all t/ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; ................. Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and (protective measures; ................_ terior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; ................... t/ C nditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (81/2 X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) O BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; V II sides of all buildings; .............. /Zimensioned; _ ?olors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8 %X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 x:tciW App icadonst2oo6 App4cationstResidential ineu Project (FLD) 2006.doc . PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 6 of 8 CITY OF. CLEARWATER • .• K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. , The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. W Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ...................... ............... .......... Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 40 Acknow edgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the unders' ned, acknowledge that all representations made in this appli tion are true and accurate to the best of my know) ,oge nd authorize City representatives to visit and photomap the property described in this application. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sw m to and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 2082& to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as identification. of representative Wary public," •'"""•58 I ? MV COMMISSION # D 155602 property owner or rep My commission expires: /0-? d[? ? ` ?oFF 6 EXPIRES: October 1 2006 1.800.3 A L Notary entice g, Inc. XACIw Applications\2006 Applications\Residential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc Page 7 of 8 05/10/2006 13:58 7274468036 AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: NORTHSIDE ENG SVCS 10 (Names of all property owners on dead - please PRINT full names) J ' i 1. That (1 amble are) the owner(s) and record We holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): i 2. That this property constitutes tty property for which a request for a. (describe request) 3. That the undersigned (11801M) appointed and (doesfdo) appoint ?? L1 S 1 ??.e fit-"? ^r S r 'G as (hlsfthelr) agent(s)to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That thts affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Cieanwtor, Florida to consider - act ) the above described property; 5. That else vtakg to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to pmcs Is epplica on and the owner auihotttes City representatives to vieft and photograph the property described In this appllcetlon; r/ 6. That (Vws), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing Is true and cook / r Property 3wner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 8 fore the u'r-of aan officer duty mmmisslonod by the s to of 1 Igrlda on this day of t personally appeared f ?4 of i w? CZ who having been first duly sworn • epos and says that she fully understands the contents of the aflidavit Eta he/sh`e'a'l My Commisslon Expires: 4P 'G*h, DOREEN A. WILLIAMS Notary Public Q (!t „ v} ?? MY COMMISSION #t DD 155802 of I 14M3.NOTARY FL Notary Service a Bonding, Ira. S.-IftmWng Depart 0WIApptkerren Forrrmsldevokpnent rovirrwlrlexrtrle orvebpnwrt eanrprehenrna. /nRr1 epplketlan?OOS.eoC ORIGINAL Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Corflprerlenstve Inflll Application 2005- City of Gew BWEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PAGE 02/02 A Exhibit "A" to Flexible Development - Ci mpfWwaiive Infill Application Project Name: Lembo Court Project Address: 622 Lembo Circle Northside Engineering Project: #0626 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Flexible Development approval to raze the existing 2,200 square foot day care facility and redevelop the site with a townhome development consisting of ten attached dwelling units with reductions to the side (north and south) setback from 1.0' to 5' (to building), and reductions to the rear (west) setback from 10' to 6 (to dumpster enclosure). Comprehensive Infill approval for reductions to the minimum lot width from 150' to 140' and a reduction from the front (east) setback from 25' to 0' (to,trash staging area). Additionally, a Comprehensive Landscape Application is also being requested to allow a reduction in the required landscape buffers in the east and west side yards from 10' to 5'. GENERAL APPLICABLE STANDARDS (Section 3-913.A): I.' The proposed development will be in harmony with the surrounding - - ` J t properties as the subject site is surrounded by developments of similar scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The surrounding developments are located on sites of varying sizes and area, therefore, the number of units vary from site to site. However, the scale, bulk and coverage of the surrounding sites are equal to the proposed development. The proposed density is less than allowed by the Community Development Code and is appropriate for the -1 amount of land being massed. The area is comprised of primarily two story buildings containing anywhere from seven to twenty-four attached dwellings. There is strong development pattern of attached dwellings established on the street and the proposed residential development of mid-rise constriction, providing two story dwelling units with an attached one garage will be j harmonious with the established development pattern and character of the street. 2. The subject site is located within the Medium High Residential District and is in an area comprised of primarily multi-family attached dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with the Medium High Residential District classification. The proposed development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Medium High Residential District and actually provides fewer dwelling units than permitted by code. Upon completion, the proposed development and the subsequent site improvements will substantially increase the value of the subject site, thereby providing a positive influer6kgh the surrounding property values. RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • •. 3. The proposed design of the development offers positive health and safety rewards to the neighborhood by providing green yards that are not currently present on the site and provides a new and improved structure that meets current building codes. The proposed site design provides a parking plan that deletes the current undesired circular driveway which requires vehicles to be parked within the required front yard of the site; by providing parking interior to the site with fifty percent of vehicles being located within garages. The design will provide improvements to the streetscape by offering a green yard that is well landscaped and the proposal provides for responsible site drainage which will better serve the community as a whole. The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood and is permitted in the Medium High Residential District. This project is a joint effort between the developers and the Housing and Economic Development Department of the City of Clearwater, the proposed development will provide much needed Obtainable Housing for the Community. 4. The proposed development and site design provides largely improved and decreased access to the site by providing a single driveway system allowing on-site circulation. Many of the surrounding sites require vehicles to back out into Lembo Circle, the proposed development plan will allow for on-site circulation. No traffic congestion is anticipated as-a result of this design. 5. The proposed residential use is consistent with the community character as the majority of the surrounding sites are developed with two story attached dwellings. 6. This proposal minimizes adverse effects on adjacent properties by providing parking that is internal to the site with on-site circulation, by further providing attractive architecture and well designed landscaping. The residential nature of the proposed development in. concert with all of the proposed upgrades to the site and building will provide benefit to the adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA - COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT (Section 2-404) A. Attached Dwellings z 1. Side and rear setback: a. The proposed site design meets the access requirements of the Fire N Department; emergency vehicles will have the required access. o W? o U b. A minimal reduction to the required rear yard setback is being 0O p LL. ? requested for the dumpster enclosure; the enclosure will be located at. z ?_- gU 4 2 • .•. the rear of the site which abuts the rear of the adjoining commercial building, no negative effects are anticipated. Additionally, the proposed enclosure and landscaping will further provide mitigation. The requested side yard reduction allows for parking that is internal to the site with on-site circulation. Further, the design affords the developers and the City of Clearwater the most reasonable use of the site, providing for adequate living area, storage/garage and number of units for the site. The proposed two story design requires a bit more land area than the same square footage in a three story format; however the strong character of the neighborhood and the Land Development Code calls for a two story development. 2. IIeight: An increase to the allowable height is not required through this development proposal. 3. The District Designation of Contiguous Parcels: The parcel is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 4. Off-Street Parking: The site plan provides the appropriate and required screening of the off-street parking. 5. Waste Disposal: The site design provides a dumpster enclosure at the rear of the site with roll out to a staging area on scheduled days of pick-up. 6. Front setback: As required by the sanitation department a trash staging area has been provided at the front of the site and requires a reduction to the required front setback from 25' to 0'. The buildings require no deviation to the required front yard setback. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA - RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT (Section 2-404(F) : 1. The site's location within a well established multi-family neighborhood makes this property unique and perfectly suited for this proposal of much needed Obtainable Housing for the community. The proposed two story design makes the most reasonable use of the site; provides for adequate living area, storage/garage and a reasonable number of units for the site, while maintaining the character of the neighborhood. Other sites within a strong multi-family neighborhood are not readily available for development within the City of Clearwater that would more appropriately accommodate this development z? 2 t. Per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the existing just market value of the a Q ? site is $183,500.00 Upon completion of the proposed development the site is J o 6 estimated to be valued at $814,600.00 ?U CO - U ? O? Z O --a z ?U 3 0 • 3. Attached dwellings are a pennissible use within the Medium High Residential District of the Clearwater Community Development Code. 4. The proposed use of attached dwelling units is compatible with surrounding land uses as attached dwelling units are the predominate use along Lembo Circle and the general surrounding area. 5. The surrounding area will be upgrade by the proposed significant improvements inclusive of the architecture, the residential use, on-site parking, professionally designed landscaping and on-site retention. Through this development proposal additional investment and interest in the immediate area is anticipated. 6. The proposed development will provide improved form and function by providing: a use that is compatible with the surrounding and adjoining land uses and the Medium High Residential District regulations; a site design that promotes benefits such as the establishment of green yards with professionally designed landscaping, parking that is shielded from the street and is interior to the site with on-site circulation, establishment of a retention pond to provide improved site drainage; the neighborhood and the City as a whole will benefit by receiving an attractive building with well articulated elevations which provide architectural interest, and a building that meets or exceeds current Building Code. Additionally, the new multi-family structure together with the subsequent site improvements will provide increased value to the.surrounding property values. 7. The development plan offers ten townhome units. The proposed building setback to the side yards are within the allowable flexible standards and did not trigger the need for a Comprehensive In-Fill. Further, the minimal 10' lot width reduction being requested under the Comprehensive Infill Section of the Development Code will allow this much needed development of Obtainable Housing. Every effort has been made to make the best use of the site while remaining in balance with the surrounding sites and uses, the target owners and the Development Code. The proposed development plan provides a building and site design that is sensitive to the, intent of the Clearwater Community Development Code, the character of the neighborhood as well as the community's needs and the developers. RMR 6-23-06 NES #626 Lembo Court ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 °0- Uearwater U • Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUM ER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 03/29/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: Cav,feXh(OV, _L(.C CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: C' CELL NUMBER: -?6q-C77 E-MAIL ADDRESS: IICt LEI ICl-4Lr ?rI -.. O 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developedAn the parcel proposed for the development. pPPL- OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. ORIGINAL -R E-E VED-- _ ____ - C4Wp -EELEARWATER- -- X:IClwApplications12006Applications\Comprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 2. LIGHTING: • • A^y lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. , 3. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. PROPERTY VALUES: L The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develop ent. 5. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted fo the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. CITY C3i CLEARVWVER THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this a lication are true and accurate to the best of my kngto ge and authorize City representatives to visit and p to aph the property described in this application. lure or property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS S m to and subscribed before me this& day of A.D. 20 to me and/or by who is personally known has produced JAL as identification. My commission expires: /J-/ r? MY COMMISSION # DD o? EXPIRES: October 14, t-a063.NoTARY FL Notary SS-09 _ X.IClw Applications12006 ApplicationslComprehensive Landscape Program 2006.doc Page 2 of 2 • COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARRATIVE Project Name: Lembo Court Project Address: 622 Lembo Circle NES Project: #0626 Request: To allow a reduction to the required landscape buffer along the side (east and west) property line from 10' to 5' 1. Architectural Theme: a. N/A b. To provide a landscape plan that is demonstrably more attractive the following are some of the measures taken: i. The proposed number of trees exceeds the minimum required by code and all magnolias and oaks have been increased to 5" caliper. ii. The design provides multiple layers along the front, adjacent to Lembo Circle, which will make a beautiful presentation for the streetscape. iii. 33 new proposed plantings of 6' in height or more, will provide substantial visual enhancement and buffering. iv. The clustering of the palms and cypress trees will create additional depth and richness. 2. Lighting: No outdoor lighting is proposed at this time and any future proposed light will meet required code. 3. Community Character: The proposed installation of over 500 new plantings consisting of 9 different varieties will provide immediate visual rewards to the vicinity and community. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment. 4. Property Values: The number, size, quality and design of. the proposed plantings will offer upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan: N/A 6-29-06 RMR/rmr NES 626 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i 0 • LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION This letter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Northside Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at (Property Location) PINELL&,S County, State of FLORIDA. Siarfa-Mb of Address of Property Own `' Vie. 4E s Vic, r' FL City/State/Zip C -68e Print Name of Property Owner Title Kj 2--7) .7 C)- - ? 00 7 Telephone Number Statebf-- 7 4 The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this i _ day Count by as who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. iature) mission # (SEAL ABOVE) Notary Public (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Prepared by and Return-:o : Howard P. Rives, III Rives & Rives, P.A. 1265 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Property Appraisers Parcel Identification (Folio) Number: 15/29/15/51066/000/0060 15/29/15/51066/000/0070 THIS WARRANTY DEED KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2006146007 0411812006 at 03:45 PM OFF yREC BK: 115066 PG: pe:DEED RECORDING 5 Doc7 $10 00 D DOC STAMP: $2450.00 Made this 13" day of April, A.D. 2006 between MARILYN C. WOODRING, a single woman Individually and as trustee of The Marilyn C. Woodring Trust Agreement dated November 18, 2003, hereinafter called the Grantor, whose address is1399 Pineapple Lane, Clearwater, Florida 33759, to CANTERBURY, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, whose address is 1135 Pasadena Ave., South #208, South Rasadena, Florida 33707, hereinafter called the Grantee: (Wherever used herein, the terms 'grantor' and "grantee" shall include all the parties to this instrument and the, heirs, legal representatives and/or assigns of individuals, and the successors and/or assigns of a corporation.) Witnesseth, That the grantors, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other valuable considerations, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant, bargain, and sell unto said grantees, their heirs and assigns, the following described land, situated lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit: Lots 6 and 7, LEMBO SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Cook 48, Page 38, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to easements and restrictions of record, if any, and taxes for the year 2006, and subsequent years. And said Grantor hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. Iln Witness Whereof, the said Grantor has hereunto set its hand and seal this day and year first above written. Signed, Sealeddaa td Delivered in our Pr M? iiiness Z14 4,1,12 / ?111-1 1 P(iint Name mess Print Name C6?d L.S. MM RILY C. WOODRING I ividually a d as trustee STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS: 1 hemby certify that on this day appeared before me, °I ARILYIN C. ' 100DRING, personally known to me, or who produced identification, and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that she executed said instrument forthe purposes therein expressed. Witness my hand and official seal at the City of Clea ater, County of R as, State of Florida, this 13th day of April, A.D., 2006. / .1 11111117111/ Pri Name: H and P. Rives, Illorl ,?0 Ao P.? .... PersonalPublic: ly known / ate of Klodced ID: c•?o?> ?t ZoPaa9, Type of Identification Produced: Q4 9 N : 2 .• o?` t'. #D0 40W42 o" W ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER to, 6/30/2006 OLl Receipt #: 1200600000000006745 11:59:25AM tan r Date: 06/30/2006 Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-06034 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Adshk Check WH BREADING AND SON FL R_D 1225 In Person 1,205. INC Payment Total: $1,205.00 • n 0z C - n r n0 p m m? my c'' z y -? rn M rrn z THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 za)FRMIT?Ip umo 5"M" SmAka loco • CIVILO LAND PLANNING C ENVI RON MENTAL C TRANSPORTATION C LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: June 30, 2006 To: Sherry L. Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Reference: Lembo Court NES Proj# 0626 We Transmit: X Originals X_ Prints X_ Enclosed Under Separate Cover Addendum Mail UPS Overnight Shop drawings Pick-Up X Hand Delivered Specifications X Applications Floppy Disk Copies Description 1 Check # 1225 for $1,205 15 Flex Development Application (Res. hifill) 15 Letter of Authorization & Affidavit 15 Warranty Deed 15 Survey (1 signed and sealed) 15 Flow Test Calcs 15 Stormwater Report & Narrative (1 signed and sealed) 15 Comprehensive Landscape Application 15 Trees Survey and Inventory 15 Civil & Landscape Drawings (8 sheets) 15 8.5" X 11" Civil Site Plan 15 8.5" X 11" Colored Landscape Plan 15 Comprehensive Landscape Application 15 8.5 X 11" Colored Renderings 15 8.5 X 11" Building Elevations 1 Color chi attached to Original Arc. Drawing 15 24 X 36 Architectural Drawings Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. c By en . Ruggiero, Project Plain 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM N ESTECH®MI N DS PRI NG.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Copies to: FILE N. Pelzer A. Haines ORIGINAL RECEIVED 1.11 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 FLD2006-06034 622 LEMBO CIR Date Received: 06/23/2006 LEMBO CIRCLE ZONING DISTRICT: MHDR LAND USE: RH ATLAS PAGE: 296B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 CLWCoverSheet i ? CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner/Applicant: Representative: Address: October 17, 2006 FLD2006-06034 PLT2006-00006 Dl Canterbury, LLC Northside En ing eerin 622 Lembo Circle CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (townhomes) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-404.17, and a reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10 to five feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10 lot subdivision. EXISTING ZONING/ LAND USE: MHDR, Medium High Density Residential; RH, Residential High Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.39 acres; 16,800 square feet PROPERTY USE: Existing Use: Retail Sales and Services (Child Day Care); Vacant Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: North: Medium High Density Residential/ Vacant lot West: Commercial District/ Office East: Medium High Density Residential/ Attached dwellings South: Medium High Density Residential/ Attached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Attached dwellings and a Commercial use dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.39-acre site is located on the west side of Lembo Circle, approximately, 180 feet west of Lincoln Avenue. Lembo Circle is a residential street that forms a semi- Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 1 circle west of Lincoln Avenue with predominately attached dwelling uses. The existing building is a vacant childcare facility. It is noted that the existing building is in need of extensive repair and maintenance. Proposal: The proposal includes two town-home style buildings with a total of ten dwelling units. The site, with a Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) classification of Residential High (RH), is permitted up to 11 dwelling units (30 dwelling units per acre). Building "A", located on the south side of the site, will have five dwelling units. Building "A" will be located five feet from the side (south) property line, 29.3 feet from the front (east) property line and 15 feet from the rear (west) property line. Building "B" is located on the north side of the site and will contain five dwelling units. Building "B" will be located 29.1 feet from the front (east) property line, five feet from the side (north) property lines and 15.2 feet from the rear (west) property line. The buildings will be 25 feet four inches in height (two-stories) and each dwelling unit will have 895 square feet of living space. Parking will be provided within a one-car garage allotted to each dwelling unit and one parking spot in front of the garage providing 20 spaces (two spaces per unit). The units will be accessed from a driveway off of Lembo Circle. A new sidewalk is proposed along the Lembo Circle street frontage. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. The buildings will incorporate Spanish style tile roofs, stucco exteriors and will be painted with neutral earth tone colors. The proposal includes deviations from the Code including, a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a front (east) setback reduction from 25 feet to zero feet to the trash staging area, a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet to building, and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six feet to the dumpster enclosure. *Staff believes the reduced lot width requirement is justified by the benefits of an attractive, affordable housing project to the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The reduced front setback is only for the trash staging area; otherwise, the proposed structures are setback greater than the required 25 feet. Existing structures along the same side of the street have been constructed with irregular front setbacks and the proposed reduction in the front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood. The side and rear setback reductions meet the flexibility criteria for Attached Dwelling under Section 2-404.A.1. In addition, the applicant is requesting a reduction to the side landscape buffers. Landscape deviations are discussed below. The adjacent property to the north is a vacant lot, the parcels to the south and east are developed with attached dwellings. The parking for many of these attached dwellings is located in front of each building and generally located up to and in some cases beyond their respective front property lines resulting in zero foot front setbacks. The adjacent commercial property to the west is currently used as a title company. The proposal will likely enhance the area through the provision of an attractive affordable multi-family town-home development with extensive landscaping buffers along the front and rear of the development and within the interior of the site. Solid waste will be provided through a dumpster located on the west side of the subject site. The dumpster will be rolled out to the trash staging area on appropriate days. Note that City of Clearwater Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 2 • i Solid Waste sanitation vehicle will not drive into the site to empty the refuse container; thus the reason for the trash staging area. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal. Section 3-1202.D.1 of the Community Development Code requires a ten (10) wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1) tree every 35' and 100% shrub coverage along the northern and southern perimeter of the parcel. The applicant has requested a reduction to this buffer width along with a modification of the required plant material. The reductions in the side landscape buffers are instigated by site constraints, which have dictated the location of the site's stormwater drainage swales, which prohibit the planting of trees in the swales. As a result, the proposed buffer will consist of a six feet vinyl PVC fence with Confederate Jasmine vines. The fence and vines will provide an immediate buffer. To mitigate the loss of buffer width the applicant has applied for the Comprehensive Landscape Program. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Section 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code allows the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table shows the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPING PROGRAM (Section 3- 1202.G): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed N/A N/A as a part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel pro- posed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape N/A N/A program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in N/A N/A the comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. The proposed Comprehensive Landscape Program has been found to be consistent with all applicable criteria. Specifically, the proposed landscaping includes 14 large shade trees (5" caliper) where 2 %2" Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 3 i • caliper is required, the installation of 16 Crape Myrtles, and 475 shrubs and ground cover. This palette of plant material will provide immediate visual rewards to the immediate vicinity and community. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-401.1. and 2-402): Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Floor Area Ratio 0.60 0.55 X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.85 0.54 X Minimum Lot Area 15,000 square feet 16,800 square feet x Minimum Lot Width 150 feet 140 feet X* Height 30 feet 25 feet four inches x Setbacks Front: 25 feet East: 0 feet to trash staging area Side: 10 feet North: 5 feet to building) X* Side: 10 feet South: 5 feet to building) Rear: 15 feet West: 6 feet (to dumpster enclosure) Off-Street Parkin 2/ unit 20 required spaces) 2 / unit 20 proposed spaces) x * See above discussion under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-404.F): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for x development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a x residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in x the district. 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with x adjacent lands uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a x residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and x function, which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 4 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street X parking, access or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly im air the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS: 1. That the subject property of approximately 0.39 acres is located on the west side of Lembo Circle, approximately 180 feet west of Lincoln Avenue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District and the Residential High (RH) Future Land Use Plan Category; 3. Currently the site is vacant; 4. Applicant seeks relief from required landscape buffer under Code provisions of Section 3-1202.G.; 5. That the proposed reductions in the landscape buffers and setbacks will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use; 6. The proposed structure heights are 25 feet four inches to the midpoint of the roof, 7. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this site; and 8. Adjacent uses are zoned Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) and Commercial (C); CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Redevelopment Project criterion, per Section 4-404.F; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criterion, per Section 3-1202.G.; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area; 5. The proposed use will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the community; and 6. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 3, 2006. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development to permit a Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 5 • reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback along Lembo Circle from 25 feet to 0 feet to trash staging area, a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 feet to five feet to building and a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 feet to six feet (to dumpster enclosure) as a Residential Infill Redevelopment Project per section 2-4041. and a reduction to the landscape buffer on the north and south side from 10 feet to five feet as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G., for the site at 622 Lembo Circle, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum of four feet in height and designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the com- mencement of work; and 4. That all proposed landscaping be installed prior to final inspection by the Planning staff. 5. That prior to building permit, the four foot wide brick paver pedestrian pathway shall be relocated to the south, outside of the limits of the driveway apron and throat. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: .? A. Scott Kurleman, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Resume S: IPlanning DepartmentICD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBILembo Circle 622 - (MHDR) October 17, 2006 CDB -SKILembo Circle 622 StaffReport.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 - Case FLD2006-06034 - Page 6 e 0 Owner. Sites: Atlas Page: PINS: Canterbury, LLC 622 Lembo Circle 15-29-15-51066-000-0060 15-29-15-51066-000-0070 Case: FLD2006-06034 Property SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Lembo Circle 622 - (MHDR) 08- 03-06 SK\Mop Request Form.doc 622 Lembo Circle zoning map • via , ' -. ' di" _ w ?3r?t• ' t r T *JA t r !Y J , 41 J1 irk l ? ? y s , , ' ? i w.'ii '? ? .• •! s 622 Lembo Circle aerial map Owner: Canterbury, LLC Case: FLD2006-06034 PLT2006-00006 Sites: 622 Lembo Circle Property Size (Acres) : 0.39 Atlas Page: 296B PINS: 15-29-15-51066-000-0060 15-29-15-51066-000-0070 S.-\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Reviewed and Pending\Lembo Circle 622 - (MHUKI 08-03-06 SK\maps\aerial.doc • • '^ HART 9T HART ? JACKSON RD FOREST RD a JONES ?? a O O 3 ?yyJ?=a OIR G ST El ® ? ?w? ? ? ?? DREW ST S R 590 . . ?< ? ? 5 ka ? ??,?? ?? a a C MENORIG(S CD tOGROIE ST k y (AURA a S? ? Z? ? CLEVELAND ST ? ? PARK ? P° g ST E PARK ST ST ? F ST 3 ,? ? ?a a< F-1 ?PIERCE V IB" Si 6 PIERCE ST PIERCE Z S PIERCE R ? ? El ? O Enepwn vrm (' 1-1 ? S7 FRANKLIN ? ? NK ll ( Ir ?Y 11 ? 'Y ll __ 11 ?GG _JI ST twvw ¢ O] ?Y FRANIO.N ( ` O > jJF FRA ST? bT D R El ??K GOULD ST CW Dwy Y W ? ? PROJECT I?NTA ROSA Q ? 16 ROWNEL! bT 1U? SITE O CHESTNUT Si S.R.80 COURT ST F = ' R, 61 TST .. O S.R. 851 GULF TO SAY ROOERS a ? D? L ROGERS ROGERS ST TURNER 3 (' TURNER ST HIRq p , ? S PINE ?u0 .-= 5 ; PINE ST Q PINE 2 LA PINE M ST a ?1? i ? W DRUID RD DRUID Z W WW 10 F-1 ??? < ?a 'w ? WAY ORK ??QF 9 JASMINE WAY p O a .11SMNE WAY JASM 1O` ? MAGNOLIA ? DR ¢?' YS ii mac a ¢ c C 22 F-1 LOTU ? ? a k'? ?u? ; LOTUS PATH LOTUS GS PATH C=5 ,pTUS naTH = RUDLE ? ? ? - JEFFORDS ST ? ? ?¢ ? ?a?f JEFFORDS 9- GRAND CENTRAL ? BARRY X11 Cl O UARRY $I NNfHY R ?? OWELLAS C?G? a I:' TUSCOLA S I ; z TUS 6 rqr sill MILTON !! I TUSKAWLLA ST TWanM d BROWNING y omQ? A ST a?w > s s k :': cR.4e8 wcEVEw Rn ..... `".: SU ? o NORMANDY PARK GR •:•::.. ..: %.:: .: •.: C LAKEVIEW SOUTH ST a g Em9 _ _ l:-::AISO?•:• '-• •: U s. KNGSIEY ST P1+1?•:': :: •::•:: ::: :•;: 622 Lembo Circle location map Owner. Canterbury, LLC Case: FLD2006-06034 PLT2006-00006 Sites: 622 Lembo Circle Property Size Acres : 0.39 Atlas Page: 2966 PINS: 15-29-15-51066-000-0060 15-29-15-51066-000-0070 SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\Lembo Circle 622 - (MHDR) 08- 03-06 SK\Map Request Form.doc • CG 2 8 3 4 5 6 RH O 532 B 17 6 15 '1041;Z131 12 III e 9 10 Q 606 3 WS 6 7 8 9 10 81 H 3 4 5 6 8 17 15 P 7 9 4 8 10 13 11 700 14 12 Q a 710 p 9 712 H r 3 4 5 8 10 100y 6 103.5 1911 17 16 1 14 13 11 724 104 116 12 DRUID RD 18T---7"-I- -I -- I- - 1 A'- 51? s ROGERS ST 11A 118 N ? 53912B 10 9 8 7 13A 51967 138 15 16 14A R/OC 1 9 CG 1W CG 10 803 7 16530 810 Q V 26 R/ OG s 10 11 a vbi vat TURNER ST ? H tiN 1 M,054 ?3 2 7 2 604 70 g $ 50 0 1, 16 h 62 61 7 24 W 14 6 701 7 0 13 70 Z 705 703 704 O RH avlz 5 707 $ 0 ^ Z O 3.47 Ac J avla Ha 71 3 2 71 71 71 1 Ac 1 71 ?0 72 711 00 47py3 a0 50 I N N.. AnBB? ? R 6 5 3 2 1 9 8 7 800 801 814 8f1 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 11 12 1 Future Land Use map Owner. Canterbury, LLC Case: FLD2006-06034 PLT2006-00006 Sites: 622 Lembo Circle Property Size Acres : 0.39 Atlas Page: 2968 PINS: 15-29-15-51066-000-0060 15-29-15-51066-000-0070 S:\Pianning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) Vending cases\Up for the next DRC\Lembo Circle 622 - (MHUK) us- 03-06 SK\Map Request Form.doc • • FLD2006-06034, PLT2006-00006 622 Lembo Circle 9/22/2006 North side of subject property. Front (east) side of subject property. q r? Vacant pax ed lot on the north side of the subject property. C? East side of subject property . Rear (east) side of subject proper-. 0 x- Attached d«ellings on Lembo Circle. Note parking in setback. Rear o vest) side of subject propertm. 2 0 Front (east) side of subject property. Property to the west of the subject site. Attached di ellings on the south side of the subject property. North side of Lembo Circle. Note pavement in the setback. 3 • 0 Property directly across the street from the subject site. Attached dAwllin-s on Lincoln Ax enue. 710 Lembo Circle. Note parking in setback. - TSr Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4567 x2504 scott.kurlemanna myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner II City of Clearwater June 2005 to present Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 -1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991-1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. 0 t • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983-1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION MBA- Masters of Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414. 41 Q, offlFRIR o*0() 5"a" smx&a loco August 8, 2006 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Circle - NES 626 DRC Response Dear Mr. Kurleman: CIVILo LAND PLANNING O E NVI RO N M E NTA L 0 TRANSPORTATION C Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on August 3, 2006. General Engineering 1. See revised Civil Sheet C4.1 for new sidewalk and new WC ramp per City Index 109 with truncated domes per DOT Index #304 within the Lembo Circle right- of- way. 2. See revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for new pedestrian walkways at the ends of the driveways Prior to Building Permit: 1. Acknowledged, prior to issuance of building permit, details for new dumpster enclosure will be provided as requested. 2. Acknowledged, prior to issuance of building permit, sanitary sewer doghouse manhole detail will be provided as requested. 3. Acknowledged, DEP permit will be provided for installation of sanitary sewer extension prior to issuance of building permit. 4. The applicants responsibility associated with the installation of water tap and a B.F.P.D. and associated impact fees (if applicable) is hereby acknowledged. 5. It is acknowledged that at the applicants expense the City of Clearwater will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as a part of this development proposal, including reclaim water meters. It is further acknowledged that meters may not be located within any impervious areas. 6. The requirement of a recorded fmal plat prior to any vertical construction is hereby acknowledged. Environmental 1. The bottom of the proposed Dry Detention will be sodded and the proposed Osid&* ies are designed at 4:1. See Civil Sheet C4.1 Section B-B. RECEIVED 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 AUG 03 2006 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM Page 1 of3 PLANNING DENARFIVIiENe NESTECH@MINDS PRING.COM CITY OF CLEARWATER 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 • 0 2. Based upon the subject sites location within a flood prone area, together with the lack of a discharge point, vertical walls are being proposed for the detention pond to mitigate any undue hardship to the developer. Fire 1. Civil Sheet C4.1 has been revised and provides the requested Fire Hydrant on a 6'71oop system at the entrance to the project. 2. See Revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for 30' radius at the entrance to the project. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Landscaping 1. The bottom elevation of the retention area is provided on the Landscape Plan L1.1. AUG 0 3 2005 2. All required perimeter landscape buffers have been dimensioned, see revised L1.1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Parks and Recreation 1. Acknowledged, open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat 9if applicable) whichever occurs first. Stormwater 1. Elevations were based upon NAVD 88 Datum, see revised Civil Sheet C1.1 2. FEMA flood plain data has been provided on the plans; see revised Civil Sheet C3.1 and C4.1. 3. The proposed floor slabs have been verified to be above flood plain at 24.3', see Civil Sheet C4.1. 4. Stormwater calculations have been revised to provide the predevelopment coefficient equal to 0.2 taking no credit for existing impervious area. See attached Stormwater Report and calculations. 5. Interceptor swales have been provided to address the offsite runoff, see Civil Sheet C4.1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. The approved SWFWMD permit will be provided upon receipt 2. The A dry well is proposed in response to this comment, the dry well will be piped below the sidewalk and has been determined to be acceptable to Mr. Bob Maran, see Civil Sheet C4.1. Traffic Engineering 1. See attached architect's response letter General Notes: 1. Compliance with the TIF Ordinance and fee schedule is acknowledged. 2. It is understood and acknowledged that additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of Building Permit Application. Page 2 of 3 • Planning 1. The correct vehicular use area is depicted on Civil Sheet C 1.1 0 2. The trash staging area is necessary as sanitation will not provide on-site pick up as it would require the trucks to back out of the site, therefore a staging area has been provided for the roll- out dumpster at the street. The dumpster will be rolled out to the staging area on days of service by a person to be appointed within the documents for the development. The dumpster enclosure is located toward the rear of the site to allow an improved site design and street appeal; the enclosure will be designed to match the building and to meet the requirements of the code. 3. Per the Architect, mechanical equipment will be installed on the roof with shielding as required by code. See attached architect's response letter. 4. See attached architect's response letter. 5. See attached architect's response letter. 6. See attached architect's response letter. 7. See attached architect's response letter. 8. See attached architect's response letter. 9. See attached architect's response letter. 10. See attached architect's response letter. I trust this information, along with the architect's response, is sufficient to respond to the minor outstanding issues related to this project. However, should you require additional information please feel free to contact me. Si erely, enee Ruggiero Project Planner Attachment: Response letter from RJ Leon & Associates, Inc. 622 Lembo Circle NES #626 DRC response 8/8/06 RMR Page 3 of 3 Aug 10 06 09:03a R3 I* & ASSOCIATES 1-813 W-5779 P.1 RJ LE'0N & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4339 Honey Vista Circle Tampa, FL 33624 Phone & Fax # (813) 968,5779 raycyn2@,aol. corn August 10, 2006 City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 To Development Review kl : Case Number FLD2006-06034 622 Lembo Circle TRAFFIC ENGINEERING L The garage shall provide spaces that meet........... SEE SH EET A-1; RELOCATE HVAC & WATER HEATER AND CHANGED STORAGE DOORS PLAN REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 3. Per Section 3-201,1), show mechanical equipment on plans-- SEE SHEET A-2; RELOCATED EWQUIPMENT TO 2m'FLOOR ". Provide directional notation on all elevations... SEE Sl IEETS A-3 & A-4 FOR CORRECTIONS S. Side Elevation facing the street is not appealing with only three windows... SEE SHEETS A-3 & A4 FOR REVISIONS 6. First and Second Floor Plans do not scale..... SEE NEW SHEETS PROVIDED FOR REVISIONS 7. What is the object in the garage next to the water heater..... SEE NEW SHEET A- I TZIIS WASH RAISED WATER HEATER BUT WAS RELOCA'T'ED TO 2''"l FI,OOR 8. Will water heater and mechanical be elevated..... NO. 9, With a Garage Depth of only 14'2" to the unit entrance door.... THE FIRST DRAWING WAS SCALED INCORRECTLY, IT IS 18'0". 1'0. Staff advises to increase the size if the units and snake them more appealing..... SEE SHEETS A-3 AND A-4 FOR CORRECTFD ELEVATIONS AND Sl IELTS AI & 1-2 FOR REVISED FLOOR PLANS, t Sincerely, Raymond J , AIBD ORIGINAL RECEIVED t;Y, 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTIvir-ItI7 CITY OF CLEARWATF August 8, 2006 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner H City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Circle - NES 626 DRC Response Dear Mr. Kurleman: CIVILO LAND PLANNING C ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION G Listed below is an additional response required for the Fire Department. Per my discussions with Inspector James Keller this additional response will be acceptable. Prior to Submittal for Building Permit: Fire Prior to submission of the plans and application for the Building Permit Civil Sheet C4.1 will be revised to provide the required Fire Hydrant on a 6" loop system at the entrance to the project. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or if you require additional information. ZRRuggggiero Project Planner 622 Lembo Circle NES #626 DRC response 8/8/06 RMR 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM N ESTECH@MI N DS PRI NG.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Page 1 of 1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER zu)FEIR E:,*o 5#4" SmAka loco August 8, 2006 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: PLT2006-00006 - 622 Lembo Circle DRC Response Dear Mr. Kurleman: CIVIL O LAND PLANNING o E NVI RON M E NTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION C Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on August 3, 2006. General Engineering 1. The name, address and telephone number of the property owner has been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. 2. The legal description, section, township and range have been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. 3. The names of the adjoining plats have been indicated and appropriately positioned as per your request on the Preliminary Plat document. 4. Dimensions and areas of the overall plat, each lot and the common area have been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. Planning 1. Lot numbers have been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. 2. The legal description, section, township and range have been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. 3. No easements are in existence and no additional easements are proposed at this time. Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions or require additional information. Sincerel , C ene ggiero ORIGINAL Project Planner RECEIVED 622 Lembo Circle #626 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRIN6.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Page 1 of 1 AUG 0 32006 PLANNING DEI?WENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ?c LAND PLANNING G • CIVILo INC. ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION G STORMWATER REPORT FOR : LEMBO CIRCLE ORIGINAL RECEIVED alas 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER - G w• A Ram A. Goel, Ph.D., P.E. #47431 August 9, 2006 Project No. 0626 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The project is located in section 15, township 29 and range 15 in the City of Clearwater. The contiguous owned property is 16,799 sf and consists of the construction of ten townhomes and associated utilities, parking and road infrastructure, storm management system and utilities and results in the following: • Removal of 578 S.F. of impervious vehicular use area and 4,238 S.F. of building and sidewalk. • Construction of 3,970 S.F. of impervious vehicular use area and 5,250 S.F. of new building and sidewalk. • This will yield a 3,392 S.F. INCREASE of impervious vehicular use area subject to stormwater runoff and overall there will be a 4,404 S.F. INCREASE in total impervious area. Geotechnical Information A 6' hand auger determined the seasonal high water (SHW) elevation to be 3' 3" below existing ground surface. At the pond location this is equivalent to a SHW elevation of 20.25. A double ring infiltration test was also performed and the infiltration rate determined to be 6.6 in/hr. Design Criteria Discharge is via overflow into the City of Clearwater's roadway and 1/2" water quality and 50yr/24hr quantity attenuation is provided over the entire lot. This yields a quality requirement volume of 700 cf and a quantity requirement volume of 1,848 cf. 738 cf of quality volume is provided between elevations 20.90 and 21.80 and recovered through natural ground percolation within 24 hours of the storm event. Because the quality discharge is recovered within 24 hours this volume is used as part the required quantity storage volume and 2,358 cf is provided between elevations 20.90 and 23.05. Overflow is discharged across the top of the weir enters the City of Clearwater's roadway and enters the nearest roadside inlet. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Iy 0 3 200 , PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ! • PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C CALCULATIONS LEMBO CIRCLE 0626 16,799 SF = 0.39 ACRES 4,816 SF = 0.11 ACRES 0 SF = 0.00 ACRES 11,983 SF = 0.28 ACRES TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 16,799 SF IMP. AREA= 4,816 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.475 POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA= 11,983 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 C = 0.20 PER C.O.C. NO CREDIT FOR EXISTING DUE FLOOD PRONE AREA T.O.C. = 15 MINUTES PROPOSED CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C = 0.61 T.O.C. = 16,799 SF = 9,220 SF = 0 SF = 7,579 SF = 0.39 ACRES 0.21 ACRES 0.00 ACRES 0.17 ACRES 16,799 SF 9,220 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 7,579 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 10 MINUTES 0.95 1 0.2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED QG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PROJECT NAME : LEMBO CIRCLE PROJECT NO.: 0626 NORTH POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.B. EL.= D.H.W. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 23.30 825 0.019 1,348 23.30 825 0.019 1,348 23.05 770 0.018 1,148 22.05 551 0.013 488 21.80 496 0.011 357 21.15 353 0.008 81 20.90 298 0.007 jo SOUTH POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.B. EL.= D.H.W. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 23.30 859 0.020 1,417 23.30 859 0.020 1,417 23.05 803 0.018 1,209 22.05 579 0.013 518 21.80 523 0.012 380 21.15 378 0.009 87 20.90 322 0.007 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME _ PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 20066 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 16,799 SF 0.50 IN 700 CF 21.80 FT 738 CF 738 • • NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 25 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJECT: LEMBO CIRCLE PROJECT NO. 0626 RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 16,799 SF 0.39 AC IMP. AREA= 4,816 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.475 POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 PERV. AREA= 11,983 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 C = 0.20 PER C.O.C. NO CREDIT FOR EXISTING DUE FLOOD PRONE AREA POST-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C= 0.61 16,799 SF 0.39 AC 9,220 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0.95 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 1 7,579 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = 0.2 STORAGE CALCULATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE AREA = TIME OF CONC. Tc = I @ Tc =60 (50 YEAR EVENT= Q(out) = C X I x A= POST-CONSTRUCTION 0.39 AC 60 MIN 4.00 IN/HR 0.31 CFS TIME MIN. I IN/HR Q(in) CFS INFLOW CF OUTFLOW CF E ST; 60.00 4.00 0.94 3,397 1,111 2,286 MAX. STORAGE = 2,286 TOTAL ATTENUATION VOLUME REQUIRED= MAX. STORAGE REQUIRED = TOTAL ATTENUATION VOLUME PROVIDED = MAX. STORAGE PROVIDED = WEIR DESIGN TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= 22.20 FT BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= 21.80 FT H = 0.40 FT Q = 0.31 CFS L(FT)=Q/3.3*H^1.5 = 0.37 FT WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.5 in. WATER QUALITY = TOTAL POST CONST. AREA' DEPTH' 1f /l2in= TOTAL WATER QUALITY VOLUME REQUIRED= 1/2in. WATER QUALITY= 2,286 CF 2,358 CF 4.43 IN 700 CF 738 CF ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 0 MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME : 0622 -Lembo Circle POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench 620.00 ft2 1,978.00 ft3 5.33 17.00 ft 20.25 ft 20.90 ft 20.90 ft 21.80 ft 0.03 13.20 ft/d 2.00 26.40 ft/d 0.20 1.00 Hydraulic Control Features: Top Bottom Left Right Groundwater Control Features - Y/N N N N N Distance to Edge of Pond 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Elevation of Water Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Impervious Barrier - Y/N N N N N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED t,U,r, 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • MODRET TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA • PROJECT NAME: 0622 - LEMBO CIRCLE STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (hrs) VOLUME OF RUNOFF (ft3) Unsat 0.00 0.00 1 1.00 738.00 2 2.88 0.00 3 2.88 0.00 4 2.88 0.00 5 2.88 0.00 6 2.88 0.00 7 2.88 0.00 8 2.88 0.00 9 2.88 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED c?U, 0 3 2985 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER L MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS 0 PROJECT NAME : 0622 -Lembo Circle CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00 - 0.00 20.250 0.000 0.00000 0.00 20.250 0.05274 0.04604 1.00 21.160 0.03933 0.00 0.02005 3.88 21.066 0.01627 0.90- 0.01250 6.75 21.007 0.01089 0.00 0.00927 9.63 20.963 0.00837 0.00 0.00747 12.50 20.928 0.00688 0.00 0.00628 15.25 20.900 0.00587 0.00 0.00545 18.25 20.873 0.00513 0.00 0.00481 21.13 20.850 0.00456 0.00 0.00432 24.00 20.830 0.00 ORIGINAL RLUENED 66 4,45 0 3 1 r- DEPARTMENT' Maximum Water Elevation: 21.160 feet @ 1.00 hours Recovery @ 15.246 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff Maximum Infiltration Rate: 1.810 ft/day • v a? cu = LF- N E I INFILTRATION : 0622 - LEMBO CIRCLE Time (hrs) z? Lu Lu s- (Z) cp q '.Z LI > J v o V LLI O ? ? Z LL z0 .' z ?U a Total Volume Infiltrated = 738 ft3 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 0 c 0 c? a? w L yr cu 21 INFILTRATION : 0622 - LEMBO CIRCLE 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Time (hrs) Max Water Elevation = 21.16 ft z? w w ? Fj w w w > cr? of U U C? LL 0 a _z z U a. 05/IV20E16 1?: F)13 727552494'.' 0 PUBLIC UTTL_TT]I 0 1 LOW 3""t, Cl' Y OF CLEA(WATRR W TER 1JEPARTMENT DA'TL- OF TEST STATIC: RiySl(:?U AI_ }?y I ("aFtlCa tP ? -) ?,? 6; L-7- i ? i 3TOMFR RF-(ILIR3'(ING '1'ES3' Y ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ,/)To r??P August 28, 2006 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Circle - NES 626 DRC Response Dear Mr. Kurleman: CIVIL0 LAND PLANNING O ENVI RONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION G Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on August 3, 2006. General Ensineerin? 0 o-9P 1. See revised Civil Sheet C4.1 for new sidewalk and new H/C ramp per City Index 109 with truncated domes per DOT Index #304 within the Lembo Circle right- of- way. 2. See revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for new pedestrian pathways as per discussions with Scott Rice. Prior to Building Permit: 1. Acknowledged, prior to issuance of building permit, details for new dumpster enclosure will be provided as requested. 2. Acknowledged, prior to issuance of building permit, sanitary sewer doghouse manhole detail will be provided as requested. 3. Acknowledged, DEP permit will be provided for installation of sanitary sewer extension prior to issuance of building permit. 4. The applicants responsibility associated with the installation of water tap and a B.F.P.D. and associated impact fees (if applicable) is hereby acknowledged. 5. It is acknowledged that at the applicants expense the City of Clearwater will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as a part of this development proposal, including reclaim water meters. It is further acknowledged that meters may not be located within any impervious areas. 6. The requirement of a recorded final plat prior to any vertical construction is hereby acknowledged. Environmental 1. The bottom of the proposed Dry Detention will be sodded and the proposed side slopes are designed at 4:1. See Civil Sheet C4.1 Section B-B. ORIG19AL RECEIVED AUG 29 2006 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 PLANNINGDEPARTlA.14T NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM Page 1 of3 CITY OF CLEARWAIER N ESTECH@MI NDS PRI NC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 0 0 2. Based upon the subject sites location within a flood prone area, together with the lack of a discharge point, vertical walls are being proposed for the detention pond to mitigate any undue hardship to the developer. Fire Prior to Submittal for Building Permit: 1 Per discussions and agreement with Inspector James Keller, prior to the building permit Civil Sheet C4.1 will be revised to provide the requested Fire Hydrant on a 6' loop system at the entrance to the project.. Per my discussions with Inspector James Keller this response is acceptable prior to Building Permit. 2 See Revised Civil Sheet C3.1 for 30' radius at the entrance to the project. Landscaping 1. The bottom elevation of the retention area is provided on the Landscape Plan L1.1. 2. All required perimeter landscape buffers have been dimensioned, see revised L1.1. Parks and Recreation 1. Acknowledged, open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Stormwater 1. Elevations are based upon NAVD 88 Datum, see revised Civil Sheet C1.1 2. FEMA flood plain data has been provided on the plans; see revised Civil Sheet C3.1 and C4.1. 3. The proposed floor slabs have been verified to be above flood plain at 24.3', see Civil Sheet C4.1. 4. Stormwater calculations have been revised to provide the predevelopment coefficient equal to 0.2 taking no credit for existing impervious area. See attached Stormwater Report and calculations. 5. Interceptor Swales have been provided to address the offsite runoff, see Civil Sheet C4.1. Per a request by Mr. Bob Maran no plantings are shown within the Interceptor Swales to assist in deliverance of offsite runoff. Through discussion with Scott Kurleman plantings have been provided on the fence along north and south side property lines and the west (rear) property line to aide in providing the desired buffering in lieu of plantings within the swales. The sites location within a flood prone area and the surrounding sites runoff onto our site dictates the need of the interceptor swales and the required open spaces within interceptor swales. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. The approved SWFWMD permit will be provided upon receipt 2. A dry well is proposed in response to this comment, the dry well will be piped below the sidewalk and has been determined to be acceptable to Mr. Bob Maran, see Civil Sheet C4.1. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Page 2 of 3 t,i iG 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Traffic Engineering 1. See attached architect's response letter 0 General Notes: 1. Compliance with the TIF Ordinance and fee schedule is acknowledged. 2. It is understood and acknowledged that additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of Building Permit Application. Planning 1. The correct vehicular use area is depicted on Civil Sheet CIA 2. The trash staging area is necessary as sanitation will not provide on-site pick up as it would require the trucks to back out of the site, therefore a staging area has been provided for the roll- out dumpster at the street. The dumpster will be rolled out to the staging area on days of service by a person to be appointed within the documents for the development. The dumpster enclosure is located toward the rear of the site to allow an improved site design and street appeal; the enclosure will be designed to match the building and to meet the requirements of the code. 3. Per the Architect, mechanical equipment will be installed on the roof with shielding as required by code. See attached architect's response letter. 4. See attached architect's response letter. 5. See attached architect's response letter. 6. See attached architect's response letter. 7. See attached architect's response letter. 8. See attached architect's response letter. 9. See attached architect's response letter. 10. See attached architect's response letter. I trust this information, along with the architect's response, is sufficient to respond to the minor outstanding issues related to this project. However, should you require additional information please feel free to contact me. rely, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner Attachment: Response letter from RJ Leon & Associates, Inc. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARiivifiNT CITY OF CLEARWATER 622 Lembo Circle NES #626 DRC response 8/28/06 RMR Page 3 of 3 ZMFEIR C3* August 28, 2006 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: PLT2006-00006 - 622 Lembo Circle DRC Response Dear Mr. Kurleman: CIVILo LAND PLANNING C ENVI RONMENTAL G TRANSPORTATION C Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on August 3, 2006. General Engineering I . The name, address and telephone number of the property owner has been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. 2. The legal description, section, township and range have been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. 3. The names of the adjoining plats have been indicated and appropriately positioned as per your request on the Preliminary Plat document. 4. Dimensions and areas of the overall plat, each lot and the common area have been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. Planning 1. Lot numbers have been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. 2. The legal description, section, township and range have been added to the Preliminary Plat document as per your request. 3. No easements are in existence and no additional easements are proposed at this time. Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions or require additional information. C!..e5nee Ruggiero Project Planner 622 Lembo Circle #626 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRINC.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRINC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Page 1 of 1 ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARWE tT CITY OF CLEARWATER ZMFUIR 1:3 (* July 7, 2006 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #210 .Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Circle - Letter of Incompleteness NES# 626 Dear Mr. Kurleman: ORIGINAL RECEIVED jUL 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Although many of the items listed below address insufficiency rather than incompleteness, the following information is provided to answer the letter of incompleteness dated July 7, 2006. 1. Because sanitation will not provide on-site pick up as it would require the trucks to back out into the street, a staging area for the roll out dumpster has been provided at the street. The dumpster will be rolled to and from the staging area on days of service. The dumpster enclosure is located towards the rear of the property to allow an improved site design and street appeal; the enclosure will be designed to match the building and to meet the requirements of the code. 2. A Preliminary Plat application and plan is attached for the fee simple townhomes. 3. See revised Civil Plan Sheet C3.1; driveway locations have been corrected/revised. 4. See revised Civil Plan Sheet C3.1; driveways have been enlarged to 10 feet in width. 5. Interior landscaping has been recalculated and meets the minimum required by Code. 6. Upon completion, the proposed development is estimated to be valued at $2,320,000.00. See revised narrative. 7. Acknowledged, per the Architect, the mechanical equipment will be installed on the roof with shielding as required by Code. 8. Acknowledged and 15 copies are enclosed. Thank for the opportunity to addresses these outstanding comments; I trust that this information will be sufficient to address the incomplete status of the above referenced project. However, should you require additional information or clarification, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Renee Ruggiero Project Planner cc: NES file 626 Ray Leon Nicholas Ferraioli 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 . CIVIL O LAND PLANNING O ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION C LL *CITY OF CLEAWATER C?arWater July 11, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM Renee Ruggiero - Northside Engineering Services In 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, Fl 33755 RE: FLD2006-06034 -- 622 LEMBO CIR -- Letter of Completeness Dear Renee Ruggiero - Northside Engineering Services In : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-06034. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 03, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4567x2504 or Scott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, 1J?7 l l Ode Scott Kurleman Planner II Letter of Completeness - FLD2006-06034 - 622 LEMBO CIR 0 • Jul. 11 2006 02:49PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Jul.11 02:48PM 00'58 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEM SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). LL.:.,_;..._ CITY OF CLPEAWWATER o arWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MYCLEARWATER. COM July 11, 2006 Renee Ruggiero - Northside Engineering Services In 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater, F133755 RE: PLT2006-00006 -- 622 LEMBO CIR -- Letter of Completeness Dear Renee Ruggiero - Northside Engineering Services In : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: PLT2006-00006. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 03, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4567x2504 or Scott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, v?tloi? Scott Kurleman Planner II Letter of Completeness - PLT2006-00006 - 622 LEMBO CIR LL *CITY OF CLE RWATER e'a'rwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 -'Cl MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING ` 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. C OM July 07, 2006 Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street Suite 930 Clearwater. F133755 RE: FLD2006-06034 -- 622 LEMBO CIR -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Northside Engineering Services Inc.: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-06034. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. Clarify (in writing) why the trash staging area is more than 100 feet away from the dumpster enclosure? Is the trash staging area required? If not, this request from front setback reduction would go away (than revise all site plans). 2. Clarify. Are the proposed town homes to be fee simple? If fee simple than an application and associated plans for preliminary plat will be required to be submitted. 3. The driveways do not line up on two of the town homes (one on the north and one on the south building) on all the site plans. Revise all. 4. The driveway widths proposed are 8.2 feet where 10 feet is required. Revise all site plans. 5. With the increase to the driveway widths it appears that the proposed paved vehicular use area will increase to over 4,000 square. Verify and revise interior landscaping requirements if needed. 6. Provide estimated project value for the entire project. 7. Where will the mechanical equipment be located? Plans need to show mechanical equipment and include the following note: All solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened on four sides by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation from view from public streets and abutting properties. If such screening is provided by means of a fence, gate, or wall, materials, which are consistent with those, used in the construction of and the architectural style of the principal building shall be utilized. 8. Provide 15 copies of all revised plans. Letter oflncompleteness - FLD2006-06034 - 622 LEMBO CIR Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, July 11, 2006 (4:00 pm). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4567x2504 or Scott.Kurleman@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Scott Kurleman Planner II Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2006-06034 - 622 LEMBO CIR Jul. 07 2006 02:52PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94468036 Jul.07 02:51PM 01'11 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #84. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291. Exhibit "A" to Flexible Development - Comprehensive Infill Application Associated Preliminary Plat - PLT2006-00006 Project Name: Lembo Court Project Address: 622 Lembo Circle Northside Engineering Project: #0626 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Flexible Development approval to raze the existing 2,200 square foot day care facility and redevelop the site with ten attached dwelling units, in association with a Preliminary Plat (PLT2006-00006) approval, with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 feet, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 to zero feet (trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setbacks from 10 to five feet (buildings), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to 6 feet (dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project pursuant to Section 2-404.F and Comprehensive Landscape approval with reduction to the side (north and south) landscape buffers from 10' to 1' foot, pursuant to Section 3-1202.G (See Landscape Narrative). GENERAL APPLICABLE STANDARDS (Section 3-913.A): 1. The proposed development will be in harmony with the surrounding properties as the subject site is surrounded by developments of similar scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. The surrounding developments are located on sites of varying sizes and area, therefore, the number of units vary from site to site. However, the scale, bulk and coverage of the surrounding sites are equal to the proposed development. The proposed density is less than allowed by the Community Development Code and is appropriate for the amount of land being massed. The area is comprised of primarily two story buildings containing anywhere from seven to twenty-four attached dwellings. There is strong development pattern of attached dwellings established on the street and the proposed residential development of mid-rise construction, providing two story dwelling units with an attached one garage will be harmonious with the established development pattern and character of the street. 2. The subject site is located within the Medium High Residential District and is in an area comprised of primarily multi-family attached dwellings. The character and intensity of the proposed development will be in compliance with the Medium High Residential District classification. The proposed development complies with density and impervious surface ratio standards within the Medium High Residential District and actually provides fewer dwelling units than permitted by code. Upon completion, the proposed development and the subsequent site improvements will substantially increase the value of the subject site, thereby providing a positive influence on the surrounding property values. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ti)a 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT1 CITY OF CLEARWATER 3. The proposed design of the development offers positive health and safety rewards to the neighborhood by providing green yards that are not currently present on the site and provides a new and improved structure that meets current building codes. The proposed site design provides a parking plan that deletes the current undesired circular driveway which requires vehicles to be parked within the required front yard of the site; by providing parking interior to the site with fifty percent of vehicles being located within garages. The design will provide improvements to the streetscape by offering a green yard that is well landscaped and the proposal provides for responsible site drainage which will better serve the community as a whole. The proposed residential use should not create any adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood and is permitted in the Medium High Residential District. This project is a joint effort between the developers and the Housing and Economic Development Department of the City of Clearwater, the proposed development will provide much needed Attainable Housing for the community. 4. The proposed development and site design provides largely improved and decreased access to the site by providing a single driveway system allowing on-site circulation. Many of the surrounding sites require vehicles to back out into Lembo Circle, the proposed development plan will allow for on-site circulation. No traffic congestion is anticipated as a result of this design. 5. The proposed residential use is consistent with the community character as the majority of the surrounding sites are developed with two story attached dwellings. 6. This proposal minimizes adverse effects on adjacent properties by providing parking that is internal to the site with on-site circulation, by further providing attractive architecture and well designed landscaping. The residential nature of the proposed development in concert with all of the proposed upgrades to the site and building will provide benefit to the adjacent properties and the surrounding neighborhood. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA - COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT (Section 2-404) A. Attached Dwellings 1. Side and rear setback: a. The proposed site design meets the access requirements of the Fire Department; emergency vehicles will have the required access. b. A minimal reduction to the required rear yard setback is being requested for the dumpster enclosure; the enclosure will be located at ORIGINAL RECEIVED its ]a 2 9 2006 2 PLANNING DEPARFMFNT CITY OF CLEARiI ATER the rear of the site which abuts the rear of the adjoining commercial building, no negative effects are anticipated. Additionally, the proposed enclosure, landscaping and decorative fence provides further mitigation. The requested side yard reduction allows for parking that is internal to the site with on-site circulation. Further, the design affords the developers and the City of Clearwater the most reasonable use of the site, providing for adequate living area, storage/garage and number of units for the site. The proposed two story design requires a bit more land area than the same square footage in a three story format; however the strong character of the neighborhood and the Land Development Code calls for a two story development. 2. Height. An increase to the allowable height is not required through this development proposal. 3. The District Designation of Contiguous Parcels: The parcel is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 4. Off-Street Parking: The site plan provides the appropriate and required screening of the off-street parking. 5. Waste Disposal. The site design provides a dumpster enclosure at the rear of the site with roll out to a staging area on scheduled days of pick-up. 6. Front setback: As required by the sanitation department a trash staging area has been provided at the front of the site and requires a reduction to the required front setback from 25' to 0'. The buildings require no deviation to the required front yard setback. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA - RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT (Section 2-404M : The site's location within a well established multi-family neighborhood makes this property unique and perfectly suited for this proposal of much needed Attainable Housing for the community. The proposed two story design makes the most reasonable use of the site; provides for adequate living area, storage/garage and a reasonable number of units for the site, while maintaining the character of the neighborhood. Other sites within a strong multi-family neighborhood are not readily available for development within the City of Clearwater that would more appropriately accommodate this development 2. Per the Pinellas County Property Appraiser, the existing just market value of the site is $183,500.00. Upon completion of the proposed development site, it is estimated to be valued at $2,320,000.00. ORIGINAL RECEIVED A j , 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARIMEN CITY OF CLEARWATER 3. Attached dwellings are a permissible use within the Medium High Residential District of the Clearwater Community Development Code. 4. The proposed use of attached dwelling units is compatible with surrounding land uses as attached dwelling units are the predominate use along Lembo Circle and the general surrounding area. 5. The surrounding area will be upgrade by the proposed significant improvements inclusive of the architecture, the residential use, on-site parking, professionally designed landscaping and on-site retention. Through this development proposal additional investment and interest in the immediate area is anticipated. 6. The proposed development will provide improved form and function by providing: a use that is compatible with the surrounding and adjoining land uses and the Medium High Residential District regulations; a site design that promotes benefits such as the establishment of green yards with professionally designed landscaping, parking that is shielded from the street and is interior to the site with on-site circulation, establishment of a retention pond to provide improved site drainage; the neighborhood and the City as a whole will benefit by receiving an attractive building with well articulated elevations which provide architectural interest, and a building that meets or exceeds current Building Code. Additionally, the new multi-family structure together with the subsequent site improvements will provide increased value to the surrounding property values. 7. The development plan offers ten townhome units. The proposed building setback to the side yards are within the allowable flexible standards and did not trigger the need for a Comprehensive In-Fill. Further, the minimal 10' lot width reduction being requested under the Comprehensive Infill Section of the Development Code will allow this much needed development of Attainable Housing. Every effort has been made to make the best use of the site while remaining in balance with the surrounding sites and uses, the target owners and the Development Code. The proposed development plan provides a building and site design that is sensitive to the intent of the Clearwater Community Development Code, the character of the neighborhood as well as the community's needs and the developers. RMR revised 8-28-06 NES #626 Lembo Court ORIGINPAI. RECENElD Oi 219 N5 C P ITY F t CLEA \N E CITY O 4 r ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM NARRATIVE Project Name: Project Address: NES Project: Lembo Court 622 Lembo Circle #0626 Request: To allow a reduction to the required landscape buffers along the side (north and south) and rear (west) property lines from 10' to 1' of plantings and remaining areas to be green yards with sod. (See Note Below) 1. Architectural Theme: a. N/A b. To provide a landscape plan that is demonstrably more attractive the following are some of the measures taken: i. The proposed number of trees exceeds the minimum required by code and all magnolias and oaks have been increased to 5" caliper. ii. The design provides multiple layers along the front, adjacent to Lembo Circle, which will make a beautiful presentation for the streetscape. iii. 33 new proposed plantings of 6' in height or more, will provide substantial visual enhancement and buffering. iv. The clustering of the palms and cypress trees will create additional depth and richness. Note: Bob Maran with the Clearwater Engineering Dept. has requested that the required 4' wide Interceptor Swales located within the side yards (north and south) and the rear yard (west) contain no plantings; plantings are being provided along the fence line in those yards to create the desired landscape buffer for the adjacent sites without impeding the 4' wide Interceptor Swales. Each area will have plantings that will grow on the decorative fence with the remaining area to contain sod as per Engineering's request. 2. Lighting: No outdoor lighting is proposed at this. time and any future proposed light will meet required code. 3. Community Character: The proposed installation of over 500 new plantings consisting of 9 different varieties will provide immediate visual rewards to the vicinity and community. Additionally, the proposed plan provides landscaping that is tolerant to the Florida environment. 4. Property Values: The number, size, quality and design of the proposed plantings will offer upgraded and positive value to the immediate vicinity. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan: N/A ORIGINAL RECEIVED 8-28-06-RMR/rmrNES 626 NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. t,;slir' 2 9 2906 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER <*-l 1mdvmo 30 Ulo j,j?l/Mlbdd3a 9NINNVld G3AI3038 lW0180 r i O OC 2 ASPHALT PAVEMENT nt - Li 1 y 0 IQ O ?6 v O1 1 I ?O S BARTKUS do SCHMAUTZ (UNPLATTED) RICHARD K. DOYLE , (UNPLATTED) w v 2 ? a U) ~ rA Al u? ONE STORY METAL BUILDING A 2 LFE = 25.6 w ~ C r ASAW.T O yv b r ?O I ? 2 e a Y y j O G _ y O 2 140. L A LEMBO CIRCLE (W' R/GHr-aF WAY PER PLAY) LEMBO SUBDMSION LEMBO SUBDIVISION LOT 13 W 68.64' OF LOT 12 I I 0 0 ONE STORY MASONRY BUILDING LFE = 24.3 "kI AS P HA L.T PAVEMENT 4ry Z) Q ? W O "s O NE?Y DUMPS7ER 10 X 12'X 6" w ]u a z n. OZ 'n 0 m G) /? \ / - mM CO ^? M y o D Or C C 9 m G?7 m m m Z I QI ! 1 /31 I ?i ?I I I xauart s.? ASPHA&T PAYEAt E NT NKK LEMBO S SUBDIVISION 6- HIGH (M) LOT 8 as, coAc cm . I'd 50' R.O.W. I e 2 TR TO HM I F ( I 1 GR GE isz<:` 1 v C NEW yr CONC '? 1 ? I Sts ????? NEW 201 :rG ' ` ;.tri ?? ? A SM,}lLVIS! Ll/Y 1RNNd.E (iYr•J I to, 10 .0 10'. i0r - 10' .o to' t ?`'?? '• 10'xfol 6w TA I 4j' r 5 R ?.rl? 5 R -- -- S GING AREA f / NEW PAtnS rL'y C ? I - - N ] f0' .0 0' 10' no 10' 10'?? • - - Wl CL -C N£W 2 STORY TOWNHOMES cAa 1 ; "? to I! iS7r ? I 1 :; --NEW 4' COW SIDEWALK I @ 10.0' ? --- METAL DECORI77W k f1 WE ONE STORY PVC FElJCE 1gr tt SHED MASONRY WILDING 6" HM,FI Mp..) t LFE a 28.6 No, 705-707 LEMBOLSUB II37SION WMIEOML i? F t<te NORTH SCALE.- 11-30' z o ya ,10 m 0 m? F V a :a a A '-vl o m? Q ad d g E w>W W Z DM 12m c o Z o? ? ?F • ?a d In EB #5936 ALI NES Comm.: 0626 Dr- B : .1 'V* Checked By: H.D. Issue Date: 06119106 Revisions: N. DW. z W N z H N W O Z O f? o O ? ?LL O mD°D a c0 W 3 W N J J ao v S lr4t' (AUp y2aao' u ' L2 N BrWVWT (}ItlQ I24W lJ N QD't!'JG'E' (/Wlt IKI? N L. GGEL, /L.D..I.F. u]Ut C3.1 \J REAR ELEVATION r ?5 LJ 0 i h ? T ?l W.P • t POPPY 4.9 VIV ?y?, '??. '?;/ ?. ;.'? s - „?=? ... h•?^'?+. ? . ;ia,?• h rim tip X4,11. ?tt,? ? yfa? ??, s.?„Y •?,L 0 _ ZANWU s. 1. ? w43or?ll?Iw?9?R??! 1vol/;I volve ilia 1,11 Ott i j LEFT SIDE FLEWVfJOIN W • ?,J COLOR CHART Titan Associates, Inc. LIMBO Body Doors, Railings Trim z? -Ile 44 ri . j k ,, ' ew 9(m February 28, 2007 Mr. James Keller Fire Inspector II Fire & Rescue 610 Franklin Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: 622 Lembo Circle - Lembo Court FLD2006-06034 NES 0626 Dear Inspector Keller, ? [-4 V f R0 N!'/"" iii i • -FR?A,r'!5 C) o PIT 1T . i • As per our conversation on February 15, 2007, please find as per your request the attached document providing the running measurements from the nearest hydrant location and the center point of our project site. The document provides the location of the existing FHA located on the east side of S. Lincoln Avenue just south of the northern connector of Lembo Court. As illustrated the FHA is within 350 feet of the center point of our site and as per our previous conversation will be acceptable to you. It is my understanding that this is the last outstanding issue associated with this site plan review and upon your approval the Development Order will be issued for this project. Thank you for working with us to creatively find an acceptable solution, your effort in our behalf is greatly appreciated. Respectfully, iero, Project Planner Renee Rugg Northside Engineering Services, Inc. cc: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner, City of Clearwater N. Ferraioli K. Breading NES File # 626 601 CLEVELrAND STREET, cc111TE 330 CL EARWATER, FLORIDA 33751; NESAD/\^,IN@/AINDSPRINC.COM NEST ECH@/\/',INDSPRINC.COM 727 - 443 - 2869 FAX 727 - 446 - 8036 3ob? Attp: //www.clearwaler-II. Disclaimer: Public information data Public Works Administrc and used by the recipk received was collected infrastructure inventory. makes no warranties. e accuracy. completeness any other particular usi PWA/E assumes no liaA or misuse of such data Thi, Doge For informa about LEGEND: CITY w ----OTHER ----RAW W ---•- •-RECLAII N. F. NOT FC F. L. FIRE LII 8? FIRE H' ® VALVE o- BLOW C + REDUCE Q WELL 41 1 'A 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 17, 2006, beginning at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Canterbury, LLC. (Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc) are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (townhomes) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 ft, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 to five ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six ft (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sect. 2-4041, and reduction to the side (north & south) landscape buffers from 10 to five ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10 lot subdivision. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 townhomes). at 622 Lembo Circle Lembo Sub Lots 6-7. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2006-06034 2. Park Isle Condominium Development, LLC (Timothy A. Johnson, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns) are requesting Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces), (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a ht of 11 ft (where a maximum of six ft high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square ft (where a maximum of 24 square ft is permitted) and (4) to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Blvd right- of-way at Gulf to Bay Blvd. with a ht of six ft and an area of 45 square ft, under the provisions of Sec. 6-109.C. Existing Use: 390 attached dwellings at 100 and 101 Park Place Blvd, S, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc, Park Place Lots 2-3. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-05029 3. PBP of Clearwater, Inc (Pilot Construction Technology, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 20,050 sq-ft office building in addition to existing retail sales and services with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 7.29 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 5.53 ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 22.91 ft (to existing building) and from 25 ft to 10.82 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5.33 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6.48 ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to proposed building) and from 10 ft to 7 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 4.77 ft (to existing .a • pavement), an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 50 ft (to roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 193 spaces to 104 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C, and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Blvd. from 15 ft to 7.29 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Duncan Ave. from 10 ft to 5.53 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along the west from 5 ft to 4.77 ft (to existing pavement), and a reduction to the required foundation landscape area along the north side of the West Marine building from 5 ft to 3 ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G.. (Proposed Use: Addition of a 20,050 sq-ft office building [existing 22,209 sq-ft retail sales and services - West Marine]) at 1721 Gulf to Bay Blvd., Suburb Beautiful Replat of Blk D Pt of Tract A Desc Beg NE Cor of Tr A Th S02DE 342 ft. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-07044 4. Forrest R. Garrison, Trustee (Greg Jung, Earth Wash) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit limited vehicle service (car wash) in addition to existing offices and retail sales and services in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to existing shed) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to existing dumpster enclosure), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 8 feet (to existing shed), from 20 ft to 11 ft (to existing shuffleboard courts) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to existing concrete pad) and deviations to allow back-out parking into the US Highway 19 right-of- way, to allow car wash bays to face US Highway 19 and to allow the car wash contiguous to residentially zoned property, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C, and reductions to perimeter buffers along US Highway 19 (east) from 15 ft to zero ft, along the north property line from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to existing shed) and from 5 ft to 4 ft (to existing dumpster enclosure) and along the west property line from 10 ft to 8 ft (to existing shed) and from 10 ft to zero feet (to existing concrete pad), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Conversion and expansion of a drive-thru restaurant to a car wash, in addition to existing offices and retail sales and services) at 18740 and 18746 US Highway 19 N. 19-29-16, M & B, 410-0910. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-07043 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. • An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://cearwater.granicus.comNiewPublisher.phP?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad. 10/06/06 FLD2006-06034, 61 1211 DRUID TRUST 01 S LINCOLN AVE PARTNERSHIP 6-Aj ST 2818 SCOBEE DR CL iARWATER FL 33755 - 4104 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 7212 k ANGYE'S CLEARWATER DENTAL OFFI 9108 SHADOW POND CT ODESSA FL 33556 - 3147 AYER, ORION T JR PO BOX 16007 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 6007 BOONE, RANDALL A 1235 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4201 CITY-COUNTY EMP CREDIT UN 719 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5916 COLE, OPAL C COLE, SUSAN 1109 PINEVIEW AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4321 DEAN, SANDRA L 1224 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4210 GISS, RONALD A 1002 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5624 HARDGRAVE, NEWT L 501 S LINCOLN AVE # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5945 HOUGHTON-WAGMAN PTNSHP LTD 1219 DARLINGTON OAK CIR NE ST PETERSBURG FL 33703 - 6315 C L H VENTURES INC 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 24 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5964 CLEARWATER RETAIL GROUP LTD 6000 LAKE FORREST DR STE 560 ATLANTA GA 30328 - 3878 COSENTINO, SAM COSENTINO, FRANGESCA 10 PINE WAY HAMILTON ON L9A 5K2 00030 - CANADA DINIC, BRANKO LIVING TRUST DINIC, VIDA THE 1320 GOLFVIEW DR BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1538 GISS, RONALD A 1002 PINE ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5624 HINKLE, BARBARA G 1234 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4210 KAU, KWANGROO KAU, SHING P 9133 128TH WAY SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 2529 •ABREU, CESAR R ABREU, ELOISA Z 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 11 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5901 BARTKUS, CHRISTOPHER SCHMAUTZ, EMIL N 615 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5963 CHAMBERLAIN, MERLE M PO BOX 2099 HOUSTON TX 77252 - COLE, OPAL C 18675 US HIGHWAY 19 N # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5111 COUTURE, MARK P 611 LEMBO CIR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5968 FRANCHISE RLTY INTERSTATE MC D PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 HAKKY, SAID ISMAIL 709 MISSOURI AVE S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5916 HOSSEINI, CHARLENE 6104 KIPPS COLONY DR W GULFPORT FL 33707 - 3970. KENNEDY, TYRONE G KENNEDY,BARBARAJ 9412 TARA CAY CT SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 1154 KIRKLAND, NORMAN L JR THE LADSON, LOUIS F LINCOLN SQUARE PROP CONDO 1605 N HERCULES AVE 4402 W PRESCOTT ST ASSN CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1930 TAMPA FL 33616 - 2531 690 ISLAND WAY # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1927 LINCOURT MEDICAL OFFICE CONDO *MADISON GLEN REAL ESTATE LLC 0 MARKS, LLOYD S THE 5ni S LINCOLN AVE JOHNSTON, TERRY 7520 SW 162ND ST CL'-ARWATER FL 33756 - 5945 500 N OSCEOLA AVE STE 208 MIAMI FL 33157 - 3822 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 MARKS, RUTH B THE MARYS ANGELS OF CLEARWATER MC DONALDS CORP 009/0085 7520 SW 162ND ST LLC 539 S MISSOURI AVE MIAMI FL 33157 - 3822 724 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5940 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5917 MELUCCI, DENNIS MELUCCI, SANDRA 5073 97TH TER PINELLAS PARK FL 33782 - 3571 MICCICHE, MARIE . MICCICHE, FRANK 83 CLOVER AVE FLORAL PARK NY 11001 - 2530 MILLER, JAMES H MILLER, ELLEN M 434 22ND ST BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3415 MISSONIS, PAUL J MISSONIS, MARY H 625 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5914 NAPOLITANA, MICHELLE W NAPOLITANA, PATRICK J 800 SHERMAN MCVEIGH DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4222 MISTAK, BOGUSLAW KALEMBA, AGNIESZKA 1241 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5960 NICHOLS, PETER G 614 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5915 NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, RUBIO, OSCAR INC 1217 DRUID RD E ATTN: HOUSH GHOVAEE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4201 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 SUGGS, RAY SUGGS, CAROL A 11400 HARBOR WAY # 1635 LARGO FL 33774 - 3757 TAIT, ROBERT J TAIT, HELEN 700 MISSOURI AVE S CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5917 WARD, ROBERT C WARD, ANN D 1253 PARK ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5827 WARD, ROBERT C WARD, ANN D 1253 PARK ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5827 WESTCOAST PROF PHARMACY INC WEXLER, FRED S 501 S LINCOLN AVE STE 10 WEXLER, SHARON CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5901 460 PALM ISL NE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1932 MOBLEY, MARK G 1237 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4201 NICHOLS, PETER 624 S MISSOURI AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5915 SECOND OAKLAND APTS INC 2040 COLUMBIA PIKE ARLINGTON VA 22204 - 6236 TURNER, REBA C TURNER, TEDDY D 933 MICHELE CIR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6133 WARE, JEFFREY D 1101 N SATURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3733 WOODRING, MARILYN C TRUST WOODRING, MARILYN C THE 1399 PINEAPPLE LN CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2314 YOUMANS, WILLIAM L YOUMANS, DONNA M 2220 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 05/30/2006 10:06 ' 727562' PUBLIC UTILITTEQ PAGE 02 FLOW TEST CITY OF CLE;ARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT MAY 3 0 2006 ' Q,;? Le M b LOCATION' ?' - - IsTA,ric; PSI I C? ,7' >{ m RESIDUAL PSIS 17 GRID # Q C-7 4 MILK: FT 0 0 c Vic CUSTOMER REQUESTING TEST ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Riw- v? 't.Fr. ... ".. - _,,:. i r u i ....- -«•1a a `_ L LAND PLANNINGO ENVIRONMENTAL0 TRANSPORTATION O STORMWATER REPORT FOR LE MBO CIRCLE ORIGINAL RErEIVED JUL ©3 2006 PLANNlN;,,::DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM N E STE C H @MI N D S P R I N.C.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX. 727 • 446 • 8036 • (? O Ram A. Gael;.:_, P.E. #4.1 JUNE , 191 2006 Pro,! ect No. 0616 • 0 DRAINAGE NARRATIVE The project is located in section 15, township 29 and range 15 in the City of Clearwater. The contiguous owned property is 16,799 sf and consists of the construction of ten townhomes and associated utilities, parking and road infrastructure, storm management system and utilities and results in the following: • Removal of 578 S.F. of impervious vehicular use area and 4,238 S.F. of building and sidewalk. • Construction of 3,970 S.F. of impervious vehicular use area and 5,250 S.F. of new building and sidewalk. • This will yield a 3,392 S.F. INCREASE of impervious vehicular use area subject to stormwater runoff and overall there will be a 4,404 S.F. INCREASE in total impervious area. Geotechnical Information A 6' hand auger determined the seasonal high water (SHW) elevation to be 3'Y below existing ground surface. At the pond location this is equivalent to a SHW elevation of 20.25. A double ring infiltration test was also performed and the infiltration rate determined to be 6.6 in/hr. Design Criteria Discharge is via overflow into the City of Clearwater's roadway and 1/2" water quality and 50yr/24hr quantity attenuation is provided over the entire lot. This yields a quality requirement volume of 700 cf and a quantity requirement volume of 1,848 cf. 738 cf of quality volume is provided between elevations 20.90 and 21.80 and recovered through natural ground percolation within 24 hours of the storm event. Because the quality discharge is recovered within 24 hours this volume is used as part the required quantity storage volume and 1,978 cf is provided between elevations 20.90 and 23.30. Overflow is discharged across the top of the weir enters the City of Clearwater's roadway and enters the nearest roadside inlet. ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 031006 P(gIVNING D CI1y OF CLEA RT T PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: EXISTING CONDITIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C CALCULATIONS • LEMBO CIRCLE 0626 • 16,799 SF = 0.39 ACRES 4,816 SF = 0.11 ACRES 0 SF 0.00 ACRES 11,983 SF = 0.28 ACRES TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 16,799 SF IMP. AREA= 4,816 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = PERV. AREA= 11,983 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.28 PER C.O.C. WEIGHTED COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF T.O.C. = 15 MINUTES PROPOSED CONDITIONS 16,799 SF = 9,220 SF = 0 SF = 7,579 SF = 0.39 ACRES 0.21 ACRES 0.00 ACRES 0.17 ACRES 16,799 SF 9,220 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 7,579 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C = 0.61 T.O.C. = 10 MINUTES TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV. AREA= C CALCULATIONS TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0.475 1/2 CREDIT F 1 0.2 0.95 1 0.2 PROJECT NAME : LEMBO CIRCLE PROJECT NO.: 0626 NORTH POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.B. EL.= D.H.W. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 23.30 825 0.019 1,348 23.05 770 0.018 1,148 22.80 715 0.016 963 22.05 551 0.013 488 21.80 496 0.011 357 21.15 353, 0.008 81 20.90 298 0.007 0 SOUTH POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.B. EL.= D.H.W. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 23.30 859 0.020 1,417 23.05 803 0.018 1,209 22.80 747 0.017 1,016 22.05 579 0.013 518 21.80 523 0.012 380 21.15 378 0.009 87 20.90 322 0.007 0 TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME _ PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPM 1,,,,1.;?gT CITY OF CLEARWATER 16,799 SF 0.50 IN 700 CF 21.80 FT 738 CF 738 • • MODRET SUMMARY OF UNSATURATED & SATURATED INPUT PARAMETERS PROJECT NAME : 0622 - Lembo Circle POLLUTION VOLUME RUNOFF DATA USED UNSATURATED ANALYSIS EXCLUDED Pond Bottom Area Pond Volume between Bottom & DHWL Pond Length to Width Ratio (L/W) Elevation of Effective Aquifer Base Elevation of Seasonal High Groundwater Table Elevation of Starting Water Level Elevation of Pond Bottom Design High Water Level Elevation Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Unsaturated Analysis Unsaturated Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity Factor of Safety Saturated Horizontal Hydraulic Conductivity Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Soil for Saturated Analysis Avg. Effective Storage Coefficient of Pond/Exfiltration Trench Hydraulic Control Features: Groundwater Control Features - Y/N Distance to Edge of Pond Elevation of Water Level Impervious Barrier - Y/N Elevation of Barrier Bottom 620.00 ft2 1,978.00 ft3 5.33 17.00 ft 20.25 ft 20.90 ft 20.90 ft 22.80 ft 0.03 13.20 ft/d 2.00 26.40 ft/d 0.20 1.00 Top Bottom Left Right N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N N N N 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPAR7ivil:NT CITY OF CLEARWA, ER • • MODRET TIME - RUNOFF INPUT DATA PROJECT NAME: 0622 - LEMBO CIRCLE STRESS PERIOD NUMBER INCREMENT OF TIME (hrs) VOLUME OF RUNOFF (ft3) Unsat 0.00 0.00 1 1.00 1,978.00 2 2.88 0.00 3 2.88 0.00 4 2.88 0.00 5 2.88 0.00 6 2.88 0.00 7 2.88 0.00 8 2.88 0.00 9 2.88 0.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARifVENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES 25 YEAR STORM EVENT PROJECT: LEMBO CIRCLE PROJECT NO. 0626 RUN-OFF COEFFICIENTS PRE-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= 16,799 SF 0.39 AC IMP. AREA= 4,816 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = POND AREA= 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = PERV. AREA= 11,983 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = C= 0.28 PER C.O.C. WEIGHTED COEFFICIENT OF RUNOFF POST-CONSTRUCTION TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA= IMP. AREA= POND AREA= PERV.AREA= C= 0.61 16,799 SF 0.39 AC 9,220 SF OF IMP. AREA @ C = 0 SF OF POND AREA @ C = 7,579 SF OF PERV. AREA @ C = STORAGE CALCULATION PRE-CONSTRUCTION DRAINAGE AREA = TIME OF CONC. Tc = I @ Tc =60 (50 YEAR EVENT)= Q(out)=CXIXA= POST-CONSTRUCTION 0.39 AC 60 MIN 4.00 IN/HR 0.43 CFS TIME MIN. I IN/HR Q(in) CFS INFLOW CF OUTFLOW CF STORAGE CF 60.00 4.00 0.94 3,397 1,548 1,848 MAX. STORAGE = 1,848 TOTAL ATTENUATION VOLUME REQUIRED= MAX. STORAGE REQUIRED= TOTAL ATTENUATION VOLUME PROVIDED= MAX. STORAGE PROVIDED= WEIR DESIGN TOP. OF WEIR ELEV.= 22.80 FT BOT. OF WEIR ELEV.= 21.80 FT H = 1.00 FT Q = 0.43 CFS L(FT)=Q/3.3-H^1.5 = 0.13 FT WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.5 in. WATER QUALITY = TOTAL POST CONST. AREA' DEPTH' 1fv12in= TOTAL WATER QUALITY VOLUME REQUIRED = 1/2in. WATER QUALITY = 1,848 CF 1,978 CF 1.56 IN 700 CF 738 CF 0.475 1/2 CREDIT FOR EXIST. 1 0.2 0.95 1 0.2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • MODRET SUMMARY OF RESULTS PROJECT NAME : 0622 -Lembo Circle CUMULATIVE TIME (hrs) WATER ELEVATION (feet) INSTANTANEOUS INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) AVERAGE INFILTRATION RATE (cfs) CUMULATIVE OVERFLOW (ft3) 00.00 - 0.00 20.250 0.000 0.00000 0.00 20.250 0.09191 0.07976 1.00 22.524 0.06761 0.00 0.03269 3.88 22.199 0.02637 0.00 0.02004 6.75 22.000 0.01731 0.00 0.01457 9.63 21.855 0.01302 0.00 0.01146 12.50 21.741 0.01045 0.00 0.00943 15.38 21.647 0.00871 0.00 0.00799 18.25 21.568 0.00745 0.00 0.00692 21.13 21.499 0.00650 0.00 0.00608 24.00 21.439 0.00 ORIGIN REGEW klL D JUL 03 006 PLANNING CITY O 7L1 Maximum Water Elevation: 22.524 feet @ 1.00 hours Recovery @ > 24.000 hours * Time increment when there is no runoff WARNING Maximum Infiltration Rate: 6.620 ft/day Exceeds Vertical Permeability: 6.600 ft/day INFILTRATION : 0622 - LEMBO CIRCLE / -0 Z c.- TOZ r 0 (7? m m m o O r m rn M ?Z -i 1 1 1 1 1 a? c? L N E I \0 9 • 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hrs) Total Volume Infiltrated = 1,417 ft3 INFILTRATION : 0622 - LEMBO CIRCLE Z 9 C 0 ca a? w L 0) 2' b ^ z . C= 0 Z r-- A r" 0 M in r 0 < Z r- > o ?- ?Z 0 C" M M xZ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Time (hrs) Max Water Elevation = 22.52 ft tier es" n Group, Inc challes R. Butler =1201 46" Avanue North St. P-,tersbure. Florida 33714 Ph 17171121-1684 l'a>: 0727) 127-7422 Tree Inventory 1 emho Cirele A,; recyuji-ud by the Cliy oi'Clearwater, I have completed an assessment of all trees (5" dill, or }'vci,lcr) ml the, suhject site and within 25' beyond the property lines. My opinion i.s sat lureh ]aelt,??as io the viability (rating of ]-5) and any potential hazards of these tree ;11? >1?E 1 / Tl? f•,i?. Y.BY.iY-t i'<'?. 5.1'?c'_ ] j ii - 'I.pClli? 1., 1111tlry j 3b`lm Ir.r S / 11"ATI1` G AND COMINIJENTS _ J.-______ 3, Poor siruciure 1 ill iirrn 11ea1 ITIy opi llorls have been made in good faith, with no coercion fi-om others. I f•nrther ilitirnt th"a I hitve no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issLle 1-101- imerest with regard lo the outcome. 5i nc.??re1,?, Clluc(: La,nl ;r; (A'rtilic-A Arborist, Certificate *'L-1?35A hail r I ;.;;;._Ir +"irot,p/ (io.ldrn FZain ?`lursery, Inc. ORIGINAL ` RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ` A a~a6 X66 3 ~ l~ r i ~EZ ~ p~~,1 f , ,o~> ~ ~a ~ LOTS 6 AND 7, MAP OR PLAT ENTITLED LEMBO SUBDIVISION , EXIST, ELEVATION x~ ~j ~ ~ . AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 48, PAGE 38 OF THE PUBLIC I RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. EXIST. CONTOUR , . , . „ . 10 ~ ~ V N ~ 9 NEW ELEVATION +10,00 ° ~ V~ NEW CONTOUR ®10® ~ ~ z ~ e7 Z EXIST. STORM SEWER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a® NEW STORM SEWER ~ ~ o N~ NEW UNDERDRAIN ~ ®®®®®®®®®®m. ~ . Q I' EXIST. SAN, SEWER ~ ° P ~ NEW SAN, SEWER EXIST. WATER SERVICE ~ ~ ~ ° ® ~ NEW WATER SERVICE ~ f~77FF iC NEW INLET z ~ ia,~ f TURNER ST. _ z TURNER ST ~ ~ ,n~ ~ r' - is ; - i ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~x w,n ~ w ~ NEW SAN, MANHOLE rat ~ ~~~~~~P~',~ ~ a ~u~.~,l,~~~~',~y ~'k-,E ~,t~4 d~~~ ,~Q r{.4; y~. d~. ~ ' n ' ~ ~ ih~ Cf ~ 0.'' 6~, ~ r ~~~~~~~~17 `~"~~N~~,~~>~~ y~ `o f a~ NEW CLEAN-OUT(C.O.) ® ~ a ~ty774 s t~ y ~~,'s~ ~t,I bed" uit~~~ ~ ~r~~~~¢~~y~ d"c~`i~.f~?~ (~r 7y CJ vr~r'' tip, I, ~ ' , - - ~r ~ ~S~Si g.~ Y~?~ . i ~ t~' a'~' f~s L i e~ a~~~~af ~~~r~~$t4~~`~ta%Y~ a~ ? r '.~y'~ t~~~~' ~ Y! ~ W_ 5 ~N ~ ~ a~ ~ NEW BUILDING AREA Z ~ r , , ,M1 ~ ~ q~~• r ~ - Q •ol,y~ t i~ ,~.~s 8 z 0 'Y r~~1~. Q ~~t ~Yu. .l '1. z ; 7~.t~ Gate! J kt ~ ~ . NEW ASPHALT ~ ~ .z ~ NEW CONCRETE ~ ~ ~ ,t,~s r+ u~ rti E Y. Ls ~ ; > wy ~ o E , ,TEMP. SILT BARRIER z , ~ r K ~ J ~ i ~~+y~'I' ~~r~~~n~~df1s o ,itl U ii~ ..i X41 CC }!,~q +`P ~,r a J •~J,1 4t ~E~e , i~~, F ,k~~,'. POINT OF CONNECTION ~ ~ ~ ~f;w ~ w, ~ t v car' E,. ~ r ~H~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ E. ~ , OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST, ~ ~ 4 r ~ ~ r . ~ i , ~ ~ ~ ~,k'{ sEI,,,, ~ ~ ~ Viz?:, r ~r<, ~ ~r ~ 7 'fn~~ ~,F: . ~t~ ~ n ; ~r ~ 1~~,x ~ M METER ~ ~ i„~~ Ss ; ~ ~ ;?J:' ~ fi l~ ~ d~' 1.';i~ s~~E,. r tt. ~~a~ r I ir°~i Z'l ~ Si+~1 ~fi. I ~ ,r E ~P i„ ~ fit. - ~~ri~~~~ m ~ mow, ~ r sr; _ ~,.'q~ E ~i,~~ ~,i, s~ ~ ~ n,,~,~~~.~r ti B.F,P.D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE ~ ~4 . ~,dr~~"' ~ ~~~~,~~i~~ w m s, ~ fir' ~ p I ~ ~ r off, 3~ ~~~;k,~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ,t ~ ~ F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY E® 5936 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ d~` .63' 7 t trf S ~1 F { qtr ® ~ E ~ 1! '~d~F~'' 'gym! ' ~d ~ ~a~~ ~ d~~i~ ',1a~: k'}i G. j - ilk, ' ti'~ ~ ~ +fi~ , Fl ~ ~ T! ~ tai ' ~~h i1, e'" ~id~ , ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~~1w ~ n~~~~ ~''~r,~~~ ` F,D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION ~ ~ t ~ ~,~h~ 1,~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~,r~ ~ ~i~~ T.B.O, TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF i ~ ~ f 4'a. ~ h ~ i~l 9G~1~;~ ~ ,`~t ~ i S~,~W~~ ~h _ r 1 E I ~ 1 ~ ' J' p ~1 ~l ~ ``d~ p } r m ~ f', ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~x ~ J q ~ ~ ~~}~ir;,I ~i ~ T.&V. TAP AND VALVE t~ t y~ l b J. di, w ~ Q ~ ` ~ ~ i ~ ° , ~ 4rrrj''~k 4 I n U G I ~ , i a, z+~~~ ' ~ f rt r ~ a ~ ~~i d i v o ~ , '1~~ ~ , ~ ~ ti' A ~ w' ~ i 4 ti~i i p ii ~ ° t s aY" ~ ~ t N ES Comm.: 0626 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ydf41. ri P'.; ~ ~ ~ ~ '`P 1 J~ ro P 7 Z`p~~ ~M„ 1 rt~ j ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 'h""~"r t ~ pit ; ~ ~ ~ , ; ~ ~ l~r,, a ~ ' ~ , , ~ a, Drawn By: B.J.V. ~ I ~ ~ I ..._.._DRUID RD----. 9F 1 f { L. ~ r , l _..-DRUID RD ~ _,i ii ~ ! 4 g ~ k a ~t u!- n b;~ DRl11D RD--.___....._ -DRUID ~ ; ~ ~ ~ , .1P°, c r ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ }~r '~j _ ~ ~ Checked By, H.G. v - 0 ~ ,T~~ r 5 Issue Date: 06/19106 i ~ Revisions: No. Date Description j N®RTH 0 0 EXISTING E PROPOSED P RE( REQUIRED ~ / / MHDR MHDR ZONING: MHDR ®RIGINAL RECEIVED RH RH RH 2 9 PODb LAND USE: LOT 6 -DAY CARE PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LOT 7 -VACANT 10 D/U 11 USAGE: 11 D/U 16,800 SF 16 800 SF 16 ~ 16,800 S.F. LOT AREA: 0,386 AC, D.386 AC. 0.. 0.386 AC. . DENSITY: 10 UNITS 30 3o u.P.A. C1,1 CIVIL SITE DATA BUILDING COVERAGE: 2,796 S.F. 5,250 S.F. S.F, & % OF GROSS SITE 16.6% 31.35% ( ) C1,2 SITE SPECII:ICATIONS GROSS FLOOR AREA S.F.: 2,796 S.F. ( ) 9,000 S.F. N/A C2.1 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN F.A, R,: 0,166 0.54 I FRONT: 20' 29.12' TO BLDG. 25' C3,1 STAKING SITE PLAN 0' TO TRASH STAGING AREA BLDG. m SETBACKS: C3,2 PRELIMINARY PLAT ~ SIDE: 96' S 0' N 5' N 5' S O 10' C4.1 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND ~ ~ 15.2' TO BUILDING REAR. 20 , 6 TO DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN FLOOD 15 UTILITIES SITE PLAN ZONE "A & X" PER FLOOD INSURANCE RAE BLDG. HEIGHT: 25'-4" T MAP12103C0108H 30 30' MAX. L1.1 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN MAP REVISED: MAY 17, 2005 PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: 578 S.F. 4,439 S.F. & DETAILS (V.U.A.) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: 4 816 S.F. 9 226 S.F. 1 14,280 ® ~ ~ I.S,R. ~ 0.287 ~ 0,54 t ) 0.85 ~ ~ OPEN SPACE: 11,983 S.F. 7,484 S.F. 2, ® ~ ~ 2,520 SF ~ ~ N W (S.F, & % OF GROSS SITE) 71.3% 44.5% 15.0% ® ~ ~ ~ p 958 S.F. ARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: 1 10% MIN. + Q Sl1RVFY INF~RI~ATION PRnvmFn RY e clr.~lf-n c~nl rn ctio~irv ov. ~ (S.F. Rr °i nF vile 1 21% 10 n .av.w n NL/'1LLV .lU 11YL1 L.ll. . MICHAEL BAKER ASSOCIATES t`a~ vex a sir LAND SURVEYORS and PLANNERS THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN JFIEOOPERTY OF HE ` PARKING: 20 MICHAEL J. BAKER, P.S. &-M. 20 ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR~USED• IN ANY WA -~~!!l~F~NT- r' "I T W', THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. ©COPYGIGHT X006 NO BUSHED L 0 a FLORIDA REG. NO. 4086 PARKING CALCULATIONS: 2 SPACES PER UNIT = 20 SPACES DATED: 05/17/06 NAVD 88 DATUM RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P.E #4743?;t,~ COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLE~ EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL S.W.F.W.M.D. EROSION CONTROL NOTES CLEARING AND GRUBBING NOTES (CON~T) WATER/SEWER CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS ~ WORK IN FOOT RIGHTS-( )OT RIGHTS-OF-WAY NOTE TO CONTRACTOR ~ ® C~ I TO REMAIN ON SITE, THE CONTRACTOR IS 5, ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF 62-555.314 LOCATION OF PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM MAINS 1, DURING CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT S OFF-SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, ONLY "GRADING BY FOR THE PURPOSE Of THIS SECTION, THE PHASE "WATER MAINS" SHALL MEAN MAINS, INCLUDING 1. DRIVEWAY TO BE CONSTRU( ~ ~ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFIED RECORD DRAW- ~ INGS, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR. ~ ~ ~ RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVIGES PRIOR TO INITIATING AND DURING ALL PHASES OF LAND CLEARING AND CONSTRUCTION HAND IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CANOPY LINE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN, TREATMENT PLANT PROCESS PIPING, CONVEYING EITHER RAW, PARTIALLY TREATED, OR FINISHED rD BE coNSTRUCTED TD Fool wDEx #515, THE RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW FINAL GRADES FOR ~ TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND SILTATION, 6, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR REMOVING ANY DRINKING WATER, FIRE HYDRANT LEADS, AND SERVICE LINES THAT ARE UNDER THE CONTROL OF 2. EROSION CONTROL AND 5H A PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM AND THAT HAVE AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF THREE INCHES OR GREATER, 105, )ONTROL AND SHOULDER SODDING SHALL CONFORM TO FOOT IND#104 & RETENTION BASIN(S), CONTROL STRUCTURE(S), INLETS ~ ~3 2. THE RETENTION AREAS SHALL BE ROUGH GRADED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, WITH ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, & PIPES WITH TOP & BOTTOM ELEVATIONS, INVERTS & ~ ~ P uWi STORM WATER DIRECTED TO IT. AFTER COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, REMOVE DEBRIS (1) HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM 3. GUARDRAILS SHALL CONFOF .5 SHALL CONFORM TO FOOT IND~400. DIMENSIONING OF SLOT & BAFFLE. LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES ~ INCLUDING THE SANITARY SEWER AND WATER PIPING. THE ~ ~ ~ AND 51LTATION FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE RETENTION BASIN, AND FINE GRADE THE 7, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO SEWERS, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES, AND ON-SITE 6 INCHES AND SOD, CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN THE 510E SLOPE REQUIRED DISCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO REMOVING OR DEMOLISHING, SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, 4. ALL STRIPING SHALL BE LE FINAL 51X ACCORDING TO THE FOOT S LNG SHALL BE LEAD FREE NON-SOLVENT BASED THERMOPLASTIC AND MEET CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE CERTIFIED I TO THE FDDT sPEDIFICArION SECTION 711 RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER, ~ ~ W AND SHOWN ON PLAN, AND NOTIFY ENGINEER FOR AN INSPECTION PRIOR TO SODDING, (A) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE WD TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL 8, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING A VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE DISTANCE OF AT LEAST THREE FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE 5. REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MAR 3, THE RETENTION AREAS AND OUTFACE CONTROL STRUCTURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SITE AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED STORM SEWER, STORMWAIER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE CONVEYING SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 7C :PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS Of FOOT THE AFOREMENTIONED RECORD DRAWING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT ~ ~ I IONS SECTION 706. ENOUGH IN DETAIL TO BE ACCEPTABLE BY AGENCIES HAVING ~ ~I t EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO MITIGATE ANY ADVERSE WATER QUANTITY UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES THAT WILL NOT BE INCORPORATED RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62-610,F,A,C. IN PARTS OFF 51TE, WITH THE NEW FACILITIES, SHOULD ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST WITH THE PLANS, (B) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL 6. ALl SIGNS WITHIN FOOT RI( F THE PROJECT THE OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING THE OWNER AND REQUESTING DISTANCE Of AT LEAST THREE FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 70 4, AFTER COMPLETION 0 A CLARIFICATION OF THE PLANS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION, WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED VACUUM-TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WITHIN FDDT RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FDDT JURISDICTION, ap ~ IONS SECTION 700. ® ~ N OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE STORMWATER FACILITIES, ACTIONS INCLUDED .PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FOOT GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SHALL BE REGULAR MOWING OF THE BOTTOM AND SIDE SLOPES, PLUS PERIODIC g, DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM SEWER INLETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE 7. REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MART INSPECTIONS AND REMOVAL OF DEBRIS, TRASH, ETC. THAT MAY BLOCK THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, (C) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL STANDARD INDEX N0. 1735'. INDEX N0. 17352. ~ ~ ~ ~ OPENINGS IN THE CONTROL STRUCTURES, SOD, STONE, ETC, WHICH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MODIFIED AS REQUIRED BY DISTANCE OF AT LEAST SIX FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET, BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE 8. STRIPING WITHIN FOOT RIGF NITHIN FDDT RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1. ALL THE WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF ~ „ , 5. ALL DISTURBED CONDITIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO NATURAL CONDITIONS OR BETTER. CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS, WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED GRAVITY-OR PRESSURE-TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTEWATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPING CONVEYING RECWMED WRTER NOT REGULATED FOOT STANDARD INDEX N0, DARD INDEX N0, 17346, THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. ~ N W WAL AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY VEGETATION 10, ALL EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL METHODS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62-610, F,AC, THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN g, 51GNS WITHIN FOOT RIGHT- 6, ALL SIDE SLOPES OF RETENTION ORS E THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. WATER MAINS AND GRAVITY-TYPE SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE REDUCED TO THREE FEET WHERE THE FOOT STANDARD INDEX N0. HIN FDDT RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988, ~ OR OTHER MATERIALS TO MINIMIZE EROSION AND PROTECT THE STORMWATER BASIN, BOTTOM OF THE WATER MNN 15 LAID AT LEAST SIX INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER, FOOT STANDARD INDEX N0. DARD INDEX N0. 11860 AND SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ~ DARD INDEX N0. 17302. 3. LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, ~ ~ ~ I NOTE; PLAN CONFLICTS, SHOWN OR UNSHOWN, WITH OTHER EXISTING 51TE IMPROVEMENTS 11, WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, THE RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS WILL BE D NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A HORIZONTAL AND OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE VD STRIPING WITHIN FDDT RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION OF THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR WILL VERIFY SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AND PROTECT RESHAPED, CLEANED OF SILT, MUD AND DEBRIS, AND RE-SODDED IN ACCORDANCE I TANCE OF AT LEAST TEN FEET BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN AND ALL PARTS 10. 51GNING AND STRIPING WITh TO THE PLANS, OF ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED "ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISP05AL SYSTEM" AS DEFINED WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIF MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD). THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, OR REINSTALL ALL DISTURBED EXISTING UTILITIES, PHONE LINES, POWER LINES, POWER IN SECTION 361,0065(2), F.S., AND RULE 64E-6,002, F,A,C, SUPPORT CABLES, SPRINKLER LINES AND CONTROLS, MECHANICAL PIPELINES OR 12, CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL SEDIMENTATION BARRIER HAY 11. ALL WORK PERFORMED WITT STRUCTURES AND OTHER FEATURES AFFECTING THIS WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. s PERFORMED WITHIN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE PLANS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES UNDERGROUND POWER CABLES AND RETURN EXISTING CONCRETE WALKS, DUMPSTER PADS, / ( {2) VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS, •WAY CONFORM T0. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER ~ FENCE HANDRAIL VALVES, HYDRANTS, GUY WIRES, ELECTRIC BOXES AND PIPELINES BALES OR SILTATION CURTAIN) TO PREVENT SILTATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MAINS, AND RECLAIMED WATER PIPELINES. RIGHT-OF-WAY CONFORM T ' STREETS, STORM SEWERS, WATERWAYS, AND EXISTING WETLANDS. WHICH SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REINSTALLED A5 INCIDENTAL TO THE COST OF WORK SHOWN A,) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT IIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE HEREUNDER, IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RESOLVE ANY (A) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS CROSSING ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE 1D AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION), (aka: STANDARD AFFECTED AREA. I CONFLICTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF THE CONTRACT, WATER SYSTEM NOTES GRAVITY-OR VACUUM-TYPE SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER SHALL BE LAID SO THE OUTSIDE SPECS), OF THE WATER MAIN 15 AT LEAST SIX INCHES, AND PREFERABLY 12 INCHES, ABOVE OR AT LEAST tIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC 5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED ® M I NTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT 12 INCHES BELOW THE OUTSIDE OF THE OTHER PIPELINE, HOWEVER, IT IS PREFERABLE TO LAY B.) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT NOTE: REQUIRED EROSION CO THE WATER MAIN ABOVE THE OTHER PIPELINE, DESIGN STANDARDS, CON' STANDARDS, CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND UTILITY OPERATIONS UTILITIES, AND SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THE VARIOUS CONSTRUCTION. FAILURE TO INSTALL OR PROPERLY MAINTAIN THESE BARRICADES WILL 1. ALL WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES OF COVER, FOR STREETS AND HIGHW RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CITATIONS, AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTERS ;EFTS AND HIGHWAYS ON STATE MAINTAINED SYSTEMS, (LATEST UTILITY COMPANIES, IN ORDER TO PERMIT MARKING THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING ~ UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, BY CALLING "SUNSHINE" Z ~ (aka: STANDARD INDEX). COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE AT 1-800-432-4770 MINIMUM OF 2 DAYS AND MAXIMUM OF 5 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ® ~ ~ A TY NOT TD EXCEED 10 000 PER 2, ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND B) NEW OR RELOCATED, UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS CROSSING ANY EY,ISTING OR PROPOSED EDITION) (aka: STANDARD 400-4 & 400-40 F,A,C, CAN RESULT IN A PEN L ~ RESSURE-TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTEWATER OR STORMWATER FORCE MNN, OR PIPELINE INDICES 15 REQUIRED. 15 REQUIRED. ~ ~ START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL Z OFFENSE WITH EACH DATE DURING WHICH SUCH VIOLATION OCCURS CONSTITUTING A SPECIFICATIONS. CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER SHALL BE LAID SO THE OUTSIDE OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT OFFENSE, LEAST 12 INCHES ABOVE OR BELOW THE OUTSIDE OF THE OTHER PIPELINE. HOWEVER IT IS C.) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT RIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MANUAL OF UNIFORM MINIMUM UTILITIES NOT INCLUDED. IN THE "SUNSHINE" PROGRAM. ~ ~ M 3. ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.50 PREFERABLE TO LAY THE WATER MAIN ABOVE THE OTHER PIPELINE. STANDARDS FOR DESIGN, IDS FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE FOR STREETS AND ~ 'S (LATEST EDITION), (aka: GREEN BOOK), 6, CONTRACTOR 15 SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY, ~ ~ INTENANCE AND OPERATIONS INSPECTIONS FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE FACILITY (AWWA C 150) AND ANSI A 21,31 (AWWA C 151) AND PIPE SHALL RECEIVE (C) AT THE UTIUTY CR0551NG DESCRIBED IN PARAGRAPHS (A) AND (B) ABOVE, ONE FULL LENGTH HIGHWAYS (LATEST EDITIO MA EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21.6, A 21.8 OR A OF WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE CENTERED ABOVE OR BELOW THE OTHER PIPELINE SO THE WATER 1, ALL SODDED AREAS SHALL BE MOWED AND MAINTAINED PROPERLY, 21.51 AND SHALL BE MORTAR LINED, STANDARD THICKNESS, AND BITUMINOUS MAIN JOINTS WILL BE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE OTHER PIPELINE. ALTERNATIVELY, AT SUCH 12. TRAFFIC CONTROL & SIDEW~ SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21,6 (AWWA C 104 71), CROSSINGS, THE PIPES SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT ALL WATER MAIN JOINTS ARE AT LEAST X623, )NTROL & SIDEWALK CLOSURE ARE TO BE PER FDDT INDICES 600 AND SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED IN THE VICINITY OF ~ ~ ~ POWER LINES AND OTHER UTILITIES, ~ 2, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THE RETENTION AREA BE FILLED WITH ANY OTHER THREE FEET FROM ALL JOINTS IN VACUUM-TYPE SANITARY SEWERS, STORM SEWERS, STORMWATER 7, ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE IN PLACE AND TESTED AND INSPECTED PRIOR Q ~ SUBSTANCE THAN STORMWATER, 4, ALL FITTINGS LARGER THAN 2 SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON CLASS 53 IN ACCORDANCE FORCE MAINS, OR PIPEUNES CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 13, APPLICANT MUST NOTIFY TH _ WITH AWWA C-110 WITH A PRESSURE RATING OF 350 PSI. JOINTS SHALL BE 62-610, F.A,C„ AND AT LEAST SIX FEET FROM ALL JOINTS IN GR4VRY-OR PRESSURE-TYPE SANITARY MUST NOTIFY THE F10R1DA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION PINELLAS COUNTY TO BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCTION. ~ ~ CE OFFICE (48) HOURS IN ADVANCE OF STARTING PROPOSED WORK, ` 3. SWALE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF ANY OBSTRUCTIONS. MECHANICAL JOINTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C-111, FITTINGS SHALL BE SEWERS, WASTEWATER FORCE MAINS, OR PIPELINES CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER NOT REGULATED MAINTENANCE OFFICE (48) 570-5101. 8, IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PERMIT ~ Q ~ I CEMENT MORTAR LINED AND COATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C-104, UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62-610, F,A,C. CALL (727) 570-5101. 4. IF DAMAGE TO THE SYSTEM DOES OCCUR, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED , AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE ~ E° )NSTRUCTION IS TO BEGIN, THE APPLICANT SHALL DELIVER TO THE FLORIDA CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND a ~ ' IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN, 5. ALL PVC WATER MAINS 4" THROUGH 12° SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA (3) SEPARATION BETWEEN, WATER MAINS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWER MANHOLES, 14. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION IS C-900, PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 15F0 AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SDR 18 IN R H R M TNT CONTACT WITH ANY PART OF A DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION PROOF OF INSURANCE VERIFYING THAT THE APPLICANT OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO AGENCY INSTRUCTION. 6 ~ PERATION & MAINTENANCE OF THE STORMWATER SYSTEM ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-2241, (A) NO WATER MAIN SHALL PASS TH OUG , 0 CO E 0 THE APPLICANT'S CONTRACT O SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE. POLICY IN ACCORDANCE WIT ;ANT'S CONTRACTOR HAS COVERAGE UNDER THE LIABILITY INSURANCE 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER; SHOP ~d ~ ~ ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF F,A,C. RULE CHPT, 6. WATER MAIN PIPING OF LESS THAN 4" SHALL BE PER ASTM 02241-89. (B) EFFECTIVE AUGUST 28, 2003, WATER MAINS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED OR ALTERED TO PASS 14-96.007(5)(C)6. (5)(C)6. DRAWINGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS FOR THIS SITE ~ I THE OWNER SHALL PERIODICALLY MONITOR THE STORMWATER SYSTEM (PIPE CONVEYANCE THROUGH, OR COME INTO CONTACT WITH, ANY PART OF A STORM SEWER MANHOLE OR INLET SYSTEM AND RETENTION POND) FOR SILT AND SEDIMENTATION BUILD UP. THE PIPE 7, ALL FITTINGS 2" AND SMALLER SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC WITH SOLVENT WELDED STRUCTURE. WHERE li IS NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLATION MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL AND # Q ~ REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ALL SHOP DRAWINGS ARE TO BE T~~~~~ CONVEYANCE SYSTEM SHALL BE FLUSHED, AS DEEMED NECESSARY NO LESS THAN TWICE A THIS REQUIREMENT I,E„ WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT IN THE ROUTING OF A WATER MAIN AND A , TOR'S RESPONSIBILITY NOTE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TD THE j YEAR, ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE COLLECTED DOWNSTREAM AND REMOVED. THE RETENTION SLEEVE TYPE JOINTS, STORM SEWER AND HERE ALTERNATIVE ROUTING OF THE WATER MAIN OR THE STORM SEWER IS NOT CONTRACTORS RESPOP POND SHALL BE KEPT MOWED AND THE BOTTOM FREE OF DEBRIS. IF WATER STANDS IN TECHNICALLY FEASIDLE DR((IS NOT ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE), THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPTIONS OWNER'S ENGINEER. R THE OWNER SHALL RAKE AND OR SCARIFY THE POND 8. ALL GATE VALVES 2" OR LARGER SHALL BE RESILIENT SEAT OR RESILIENT WEDGE BUT SIUPPLIQSIOMWATEREORTPERSONS PROPOSNG TOLCONSTR CTRCONFLICI°M NOHOLESTMUST~RS~~ THE POND MORE THAN 48 HOU 5 / MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C509. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESP 10, AT LEAST THREE (3) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR JTRACTOR S RESPONSIBILITY TO PERFORM A SURVEY (ACCOMPANIED BY SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER AND APPROPRIATE AGENCIES, AND SUPPLY THEM WITH BOTTOM, A5 DEEMED NECESSARY AND NO LESS THAN TWICE A YEAR TO RESTORE THE OBTAIN A SPECIFIC PERMIT FROM THE DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART V OF THIS CHAPTER PERCOLATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE POND, THE OWNER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MAKE 9. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C502 AND SHALL BE AND MUST PROVIDE IN THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT OR DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND DESIGN THE ARCHITECT AND OWNER} O i AND OWNER} OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA INCLUDING BUILDINGS} ALL REQUIRED SHOP DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTORS NAME, STARTING DATE, ! SURE THAT TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY NOTHING ENTERS THE SYSTEM BESIDES DATA ACCOMPAM'ING THEIR PERMIT APPLICATION THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: APPROVED BY THE LOCAL UTILITY AND FIRE MARSHALL. (1 TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE. AND SITE IMMEDIATELY UPON C STORMWATER THAT COULD DETERIORATE THE FUNCTIONING CAPABILITIES OF THE SYSTEM, LE, 10. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW-OFFS AT THE END OF WATER (2 A STATEMENT IDENTIFYING THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE. AND WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCI DIATELY UPON OCCUPYING THE WORK AREA AND BY PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECTED SCHEDULE, AND OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. ANY WORK GASOLINE, OIL, GREASE, CHEMICALS, ETC, SERVICE LATERALS TO ASSURE ADEQUATE FLUSHING AND DISINFECTION, (3) ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS IN SUB- CLASS CONDITION (SURFACES 1 CORRESPONDENCE DETAILING ANY AREAS THAT ARE NOT IN A FIRST PERFORMED PRIOR TO NOTIFYING THE ENGINEER, OR WITHOUT AGENCY INSPECTOR ION (SURFACES THAT ARE UNBROKEN, NON-CRACKED, NON-RUSTING, PRESENT, MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S NES Comm.. 0626 ~ ~ THE POND UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE INSPECTED ANNUALLY AND RETROFITTED AND SUBPARAGRAPHS A, THROUGH D. BELOW. WITHOUT CHIPS, WITHOUT SPLIP S, WITHOUT SPLINTERS, OF TEXTURE MATCHING ITS SURROUNDING, EXPENSE, j FLUSHED SEMI-ANNUALLY, CLOGGED OR SPENT FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN 11. THRUST BLOCKING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL FITTINGS AND HYDRANTS AS SHOWN (A) EACH WATER MAIN PASSING THROUGH A CONFLICT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE A FLEXIBLE, WATERTIGHT WITH NEW APPEARING FINISHES 'FARING FINISHES, AND OPERATING A5 ORIGINALLY DESIGNED OR 11, BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SOLIDLY TAMPED AROUND PIPES IN 6" LAYERS UP Drawn By: B.J,V. ~ ALL MANNERS AS WITH THE HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SPENT FILTER MATERIAL ON DETAILS. JOINT ON EACH SIDE OF THE MANHOLE TO ACCOMMODATE DIFFERENTIAL SETTING BETWEEN THE MAIN INTENDED TO OPERATE) WHICH SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A PERMITTED FACILITY, 12. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION MEFHODS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL AND THE MANHOLE. CONCLUSION OF THE PROJECT, OPERATE) WHICH WILL REMAIN IN THEIR PRESENT CONDITION AT THE TO A LEVEL OF AT LEAST ONE FOOT ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE. IN AREAS TO BE PAVED, BACKFILL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% MAXIMUM DENSITY A5 )F THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING DETERMINED BY AASHTO T-99, Checked By: H.G, BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL. REGULATORY AGENCY CODES, ((B) WITHIN EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE THE WATER MAIN PASSING THROUGH THE MANHOLE SHALL BE THE OWNER A COMPLETE PROJ COMPLETE PROJECT IN FIRST CLASS CONDITION MEETING INDUSTRY WIDE 12. SITE WORK CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 3,000 I TATION CONTROL NOTES INSTALLED IN A WATERTIGHT CASING biPE HAVING HIGH IMPACT STRENGTH I.E., HAVING AN IMPACT EROSION AND S L ( 13. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL HAVE PURPLE COLOR PIPING AND LABELING ON THE STRENGTH (I,E., HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST EQUAL TO THAT OF 0.25-INCH-THICK DUCTILE STANDARDS IN QUALITY AND PI QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE PROJECT AREA P.S.I. IN 28 DAYS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, 1, SEDIMENT TRAPPING MEASURES; SEDIMENT BASINS AND TRAPS, PERIMETER BERMS, PIPE TO INSURE DIFFERENTIATION FROM POTABLE WATER PIPING. IRON PIPE), BUILDING(S) AND SITE (REGAR[ .ND SITE (REGARDLESS OF WHETHER AN AREA IS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED ~ FILTER FENCES, BERMS, SEDIMENT BARRIERS, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS AND OTHER (C) EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE SHALL HAVE AN ACCESS OPENING, AND SHALL BE SIZED, TO ALLOW FOR WITHIN THE DRAWINGS AND SPI MEASURES INTENDED TO TRAP SEDIMENT AND/OR PREVENT THE TRANSPORT OF EASY CLEANING OF THE MANHOLE. RAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR NOT) UNLESS A PARTICULAR AREA HAS 13, ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THE WORK SHALL BE RESTORED Issue Date: 06119106 SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES, OR INTO EXISTING WATER BODIES, MUST BE WATER SYSTEM TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS BEEN DESCRIBED IN THE AFOR 1ED IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PHOTOGRAPHS AND WRITTEN DETAILS, TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS, ADDITIONAL COSTS ARE INCIDENTAL TO HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT THE EXISTING BUILDING(S) OTHER CONSTRUCTION AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION IS TO BE ALLOWED. R@VISIOI1Si INSTALLED, CONSTRUCTED OR, IN THE CASE OF VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, PROTECTED (D) GRATINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM SEWER INLETS UPSTREAM OF EACH CONFLICT MANHOLE CONTRACTOR HAS THE RESPON FROM DISTURBANCE, AS A FIRST STEP IN THE LAND ALTERATION PROCESS, SUCH TO PREVENT LARGE OBJECTS FROM ENTERING THE MANHOLE. UTILITIES AND SITE 1T-IROUGHOI SITE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT TIME FRAME. SHOULD, DURING THE No. Date Description SYSTEMS SHALL BE FULLY OPERATIVE AND INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE 1. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, INCLUDING FITTINGS, HYDRANTS, (4 SEPARATION BETWEEN FIRE H1'DRAM ORNNS AND SANITARY OR STORM SEWERS,: WASTEWATER OR COURSE OF THE WORK, ANY A HE WORK, ANY AREA OF THE BUILDING(S) AND/OR UTILITIES AND/OR 14, ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED, ARE TO BE SEEDED AND CONNECTI N AN VA V S SHAL REMAIN UN V R D UNTIL PROPERLY PRESSURE STORMWATER FORCE MAINS RECLAIMED WATER PIPEUNES AND ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL ANY OTHER DISTURBANCE OF THE SITE BEGINS, 0 D L E L CO E E SYSTEMS, NEW OR RELOCAYED FIRE HYDRANTS WITH UNDERGROUND DRAINS SHALL ct LOCATED SO THAT O /OR UTILI TESTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. PRESSURE TESTS TO BE IN THE BUILDINGS AND ;S) AND/OR UTILITIES AND OR THE SITE BECOME DAMAGED AND THAT MULCHED TO DOT, STANDARDS, AND MAINTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY STAND OF _ j / GRASS, ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD, HAVE 2, PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEMS: DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL ACCORDANCE WITH WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE DRAINS ARE AT LEAST THREE FEET FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED STORM SEWER, STORMWATER AREA WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY C STORM SEWER INLETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED BY FORCE MAIN, OR PIPEUNE CONVEYING RECLAIMED WATER REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62-610, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AN T SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT TO BE A PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION, THE BEEN OBTAINED, ANY WASHOUTS, REGRADING, RESEEDING, AND GRASSING WORK, Q ~ AND OTHER EROSION WORK REQUIRED, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR, SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, SOD, STONE, ETC., WHICH SHALL BE OWNERS ELtiOII~EER AND WATER DEPARTMENT INSPECTORS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF F,A,C, AT LEAST THREE FEET, AND PREFERABLY TEN FEET FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED VACUUM-TYPE SHALL REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE DAMAGED AREA TO THE 5ATI5FACTION AT HIS EXPENSE,. UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE, BY THE j ITECT AND OWNER AT NO ADDITIONAL C05T TO THE OWNER. REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD, MODIFI D AS REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS AND WHICH PERFORMING TESTS. SANITARY SEWER, AT (EAST 51X FEET, AND PREFERABLY TAN FEET, FROM ANY EXISTWG OR PROPOSED GRAVITY OF THE ARCHITECT AND OWNEF MAINTAINED AND E OR PRESSURE -TYPE SANITARY SEWER, WASTLINATER FORCE MAIN, OR PIPELINE COIuVEYING RECLAIMED WATER MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE INSTALLATION. NOT REGULATED UNDER PART III OF CHAPTER 62-610, F.A,C, AND AT LEAST TEN F[E1 FROM ANY EXISTING 2. NEW WATER MAINS OR PROPOSED "ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM" AS DEFINED IN SECTION 381.0065(2), 3, SEDIMENTATION BASIN; THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROHIBIT DISCHARGE AFTER COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION OF NEW WATER MAINS, PRESSURE TESTING SHALL F.S. AND RULE 64E-6,002, F.A,C, WATER SUPPLY I SANITARY SEWER 15. THE SOILS ENGINEER 15 TO SUPPLY THE ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL OF SILT THROUGH THE OUTFACE STRUCTURE DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ANY RETENTION STORM SEWER AREA AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUT THE RETENTION AREA BEFORE INSTALLING BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTION WATER SYSTEM (5) FXCEP110N5, WHERE IT 15 NOT TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE OR ECONOMICALLY SENSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH THE NATURAL AND LP GAS LINES COMPACTION TESTS, AND ASPHALT RESULTS, THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO CERTIFY TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, IN WRITING, THAT ALL TESTING REQUIREMENTS, ANY PERMANENT SUBDRAIN PIPE, IN ADDITION, PERMANENT RETENTION AREAS MUST STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM CHLORINATION. REQUIREMENTS IN SUBSECTION (I) OR (2) ABODE, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLOW EXCEPTIONS TO THESE ELECTRICAL POWER )WER RECLAIMED WATER SUPPLY REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY, AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BE TOTALLY CLEANED OUT AND OPERATE PROPERLY AT FINAL INSPECTION AND AT SAMPLING OF NEW WATER MAINS SHALL CONFORM WITH COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT REQUIREMENTS IF SUPPLIES OF WATER OR CONSTRUC110N PERMIT APPLICANTS PR0410E TECHNICAL OR ECONOMIC IRRIGATION LINES JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH EXCEPTION AND PROVIDE ALTERNATNE CONSTRUCTION FEATURES THAT AFFORD A SIMILAR !ES T,V, CABLES TRANSPORTATION=(FDDT), FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS REQUIRED BY THE THE END OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD, REQUIREMENTS AND RESULTS FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES LEVEL OF REUABILRY AND PUBLIC HEALTH PROTECTION, ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE CONSTRUCTION FEATURES, FIBER OPTIC CABLES )ARLES TELEPHONE CABLES ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. Q i YSTEM CABLES SECURITY WIRING 16, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A COPY OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND PERMITS Q I 4, SWALES, DITCHES AND CHANNELS; ALL SWALES, DITCHES AND CHANNELS LEADING SHALL A NEW WATER SYSTEM BE PLACED INTO SERVICE UNTIL CERTIFICATION BY THE INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING, FIRE ALARM SYSTEM CABLES FROM THE SITE SHALL BE SODDED WITHIN (3) DAYS OF EXCAVATION. ALL OTHER ENGINEER ..HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND A RELEASE FROM COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH UNIT A WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MNN IS BEING LND LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE CONTROL WIRING NG SITE UNDERGROUND MECHANICAL AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, INTERIOR SWALES, ETC„ INCLUDING DETENTION AREAS WILL BE SODDED PRIOR TO (FR)OM ANOTHER PIPEUN AND WH R AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS CROSSING ANOTHER PIPELINE AND OIN SYSTEMS INCLUDING INSULATION 17, THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT INCLUDE NECESSARY COMPONENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, HA5 BEEN ISSUED. IN THE WATER MAIN ARE BEING LOCATED LESS THAN THE REQUIRED MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM JOINTS IN THE OT ER 5, PROTECTION AND STABILIZATION OF SOIL STOCKPILES: FILL MATERIAL STOCKPILES PIPEUNE, SAFETY, THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR MEANS AND METHODS FOR Q / / SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES BY ON-SITE DRAINAGE CONTROLS WHICH IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S IE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE SPECIFIC LOCATION CONSTRUCTION SITE SAFETY, PREVENT EROSION OF THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL, CONTROL OF DUST FROM SUCH SANITARY SEWER NOTES (i) USE OF PRESSURE-RATED PIPE CONFORMING TO THE AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARDS OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVIC STOCKPILED MATERIAL, MAY BE REQUIRED, DEPENDING UPON THEIR LOCATION AND THE INCORPORATED INTO RULE 62-555.330, FAG., FOR THE OTHER PIPELINE IF IT IS A GRAVITY-OR, VACUUM- RGROUND SERVICES BY CAREFUL HAND EXCAVATION ONLY UNLESS 18, ALL SODDING, SEEDING AND MULCHING SHALL INCLUDE WATERING AND I, EXPECTED LENGTH OF TIME THE STOCKPILES WILL BE PRESENT. IN NO CASE SHALL 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS & LATERAL SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 36 INCHES OF TYPE PIPELINE. OTHER MEANS ARE APPROVED ARE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT AND OWNER BEFORE BEGINNING THE FERTILIZATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THESE ' UNSTABILIZED STOCKPILE REMAIN AFTER THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS. COVER, (2) USE OF WELDED, FUSED, 4R OTHERWISE RESTRAINED JOINTS FOR EITHER THE WATER MAIN OR THE OTHER WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHAT PIPELINE. AND ALL DAMAGED UNDERGROL )ONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE OR REPAIR, PER SPECIFICATIONS, ANY AREAS UNTIL THE PROJECT IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER, AGED UNDERGROUND SERVICES AS LISTED ABOVE AT NO ADDITIONAL 19, ALL PIPE LENGTHS ARE PLUS OR MINUS, PIPE MEASUREMENTS ARE CENTER TO 6. MAINTENANCE; ALL EROSION AND SILTATION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE CHECKED 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS & SERVICE LATERALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF REGULARLY, ESPECIALLY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND WILL BE CLEANED OUT POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE, SDR 35 OR AS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE (3) USE OF WATERTIGHT CASING PIPE OR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT AT LEAST FOUR INCHES THICK FOR EITHER THE COST TO THE OWNER. OWNER. CENTER OF STRUCTURES OR FITTINGS, PIPE MEASUREMENTS FOR MITERED END AND/OR REPAIRED AS REQUIRED. CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, WWAATER MAIN OR THE OTHER PIPELINE. SECTIONS ARE TD END OF PIPE, I 3. ALL SANITARY SEWER WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS (B) WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS BEING LND LE55 THAN THREE FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANOTHER FILTER MEDIUM SPECIFICATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS, PIPELINE AND WHERE AN UNDERGROUND WATER MAIN IS CROSSING ANOTHER PIPEUNE AND 15 BEING LAID LESS THAN 20. EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE SAW-CUT WHERE NEW PAVEMENT 15 TO BE ADDED I THE REQUIRED MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE OTHER PIPELINE, 1. TRENCH EXCAVATION CAVATION OR EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE ELIMINATED, THE FILTER SAND SHALL BE WASHED MATERIAL MEETING F.D,O.T. ROAD AND BRIDGE 4. PRIOR TO COMMENCING. WORK WHICH REQUIRES CONNECTING NEW WORK TO EXISTING 1 USE OF PIPE OR CASING PIPE HAVING HIGH IMPACT STRENGTH I.E. HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST -INCLUDE OSHA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR SILICA SAND AND QUARTZ GRAVELS, OR MIXTURES THEREOF (LESS LINES OR APPURTENANCES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND ~~UA1 TO THAT dF 0,25-INCH-THICK DUCTILE IRON PIPE OR CONCf~ET~ ENCASEMEM AT LEAST FOUR INCHES THICK OSHA STANDARD 29 CFR, SECTION 1926,650 SUBPART P, WHICH IS 21. ADJUSTMENTS OF INLETS, JUNCTION BOXES, MANHOLE TOPS, WATER VALVES, WATER THAN ONE 1 PERCENT SILT CLAY AND ORGANIC MATTER UNLESS FILTER CLOTH IS F R TH W R MAIN AN ) NOW A PART DF LAWS OF ~ ELEVATION OF EXISTING CONNECTION POINT AND NOTIFY OWNERS ENGINEER OF 0 E ATE D 'ART DF LAWS OF FLORIDA CHAPTER 90-96. METERS, ETC,, SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACTOR'S BID AND NO CLAIM USED WHICH 15 SUITABLE TO RETAIN THE SILT, CLAY AND ORGANIC MATTER WITHIN THE ANY CONFLICTS OR DISCREPANCIES. -THE CONTRACTOR SHALL F FILTER; CALCIUM CARBONATE AGGREGATE IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSTITUTE; AND HAVE (2) USE OF PIPE, OR CASING PIPE, HAVING HIGH IMPACT STRENGTH (I.E., HAVING AN IMPACT STRENGTH AT LEAST WITH THIS LAW. TRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE WRITTEN ASSURANCE OF COMPLIANCE SHALL BE MADE AGAINST THE OWNER OR ENGINEER FOR THESE ADJUSTMENTS, ~ AN EFFECTIVE GRAIN SIZE OF 0,20 TO 0,55 MILLIMETERS IN DIAMETER; A UNIFORMITY 5. PVC PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM SPECIFICATIONS DESIGNATION EEQUAL TO THAT OF 0,25-INCH-THICK DUCTILE IRON PIPE) OR CONCRETE ENCASEMEM AT LEAST FOUR INCHES THICK - A SEPARATE COST ITEM IC ~ LAW. IF REQUIRED, ITE COST ITEM IDENTIFYING THE COST OF COMPLIANCE, COEFFICIENT OF 1,5 OR GREATER, D-3034-77C, MA SDR 35, INSTALLATION OF SDR 35 PIPE SHALL BE IN STRICT FOR THE OTHER PIPELINE IF IT 15 NEW AND IS CONVEYING WASTEWATER OR RECLAIMED WATER. - A TRENCH SAFETY SYSTEM RATE OF 0,125 CM/SEC, OR GREATER, IF THE PERMEABILITY RATE OF THE FILTER ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM SPECIFICATION SECTION 02321, APPROVED BY THE ENGINI i SAFETY SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND 22, ALL BACKFILL OVER ANY PIPE (STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER, OR WATERLINES) D BY THE ENGINEER. THAT IS INSTALLED UNDER ROADWAYS OR WITHIN THE EMBANKMENT OF THE ROADWAY, SAND IS LESS THAN 0,125 CM/SEC. A REPLACEMENT OF THE FILTER SYSTEM WILL ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPELINES SHALL BE SOLID GREEN IN COLOR, GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 2. AlL RETENTION AREAS, STOF BE REQUIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE 6, ALL PVC FORCE MAINS SHALL BE CLASS 2000, SDR 21, COLOR GREEN, WITH A 1. ALL DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCE MATERIAL, (I.E. MUCK, PEAT, BURIED DEBRIS), IS MUST BE IN PLACE AS PART PION AREAS, STORM SEWER PIPING, STORM SEWER STRUCTURES, ETC, SHALL BE COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH F,D,O,T, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, SAND TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IT 15 GREEN MAGNETIC TAPE A MINIMUM OF 2" WIDE, PLACED 1 FOOT BELOW THE TO BE EXCAVATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OI PLACE AS PART OF THE FIRST PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SECTION 125-8,3, LATEST EDITION, IESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ACCOMMODATE POSITIVE I RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAVE THE FILTER SAND TESTED AND APPROVED, PROPOSED GRADE. THE PRINTING ON THE MAGNETIC TAPE SHOULD READ OWNER'S ENGINEER, OR OWNER'S 501E TESTING COMPANY. DELETERIOUS MATERIAL DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT CON HROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TO AVOID FLOODING OF THE ADJACENT 23. THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMING TRENCH EXCAVATION, IN EXCESS OF 5' FEET IN DEPTH, "FORCEMAIN". IS TO BE STOCKPILED OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. PROPERTIES, ANY FLOODING 2. THE PERFORATED PIPE SHALL CONSIST OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PVC) CONFORMING TO EXCAVATED AREAS ARE TO BE BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED MATERIALS AND THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY 0 ANY FLOODING THAT MAY OCCUR DUE TO HI5 WORK WILL BE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION'S ZESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR (OSHA) TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY STANDARDS, 29 C,F,R., S.1926,650, SUBPART P, , ASTM D 3033, HAVE MINIMUM OF SIXTEEN (16) 3/8 INCH DIAME ER PERFORATIONS 7, ALL DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A 21,50 COMPACTED AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, PER LINEAR FOOT OF PIPE AND BE ON THE BOTTOM 135 OF THE PIPE, {AWWA C 150) AND ANSI A21,51 (AWWA C 151), DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL 3. THE USE OF ELECTRONICALL iF ELECTRONICALLY STORED DATA IS INTENDED FOR INFORMATIONAL INCLUDING ALL SUBSEQUENT REVISIONS OR UPDATES TO THE STANDARDS AS j 2, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXCAVATING AGAINST PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DEWATERING MEASURES AS REQUIRED DURING RECEIVE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR BITUMINOUS COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI COLLAPSE AND WILL PROVIDE BRACING, SHEETING, OR SHORING, AS NECESSARY, MUST UTILIZE SIGNED AND ' ONLY AND NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR ADOPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF-LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY IDLES), THE INSTALLATION OF THE UNDERDRAIN AND. ALL OF ITS COMPONENTS, A 21,6, 'A 21,6, OR A 21.51, TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BEING ZE SIGNED AND SEALED DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION, 24, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE POINTS OF CONNECTIONS OF THE UTILITIES WITH 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BACKFILL THE DRAIN PIPE UNTIL THE ENGINEER HAS 8, ALL SANITARY SEWER GRAVITY MAINS OR SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAINS THAT PLACED, DEWATERING SHALL BE USED AS REQUIRED, VERIFIED AND APPROVED THE DRAIN PIPE GRADES AND INSTALLATION OF FILTER MEDIA, REQUIRE D.I.P, ARE TO BE POLYLINED OR EPOXY LINED. DIFFERENT SUBS. SITE CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT THE UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURES 3, ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE CLASS III (ASTM C-76) i.e. SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, WATER LINES, FIRE LINES, ETC., TO 5~ OUTSIDE ! 5. SWFWMD REQUIRES AS-BUILT CERTIFICATION BY THE ENGINEER FOR THIS FILTER SYSTEM, g, ALL SANITARY SEWER COVERS SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED FOR HS-20 LOADING. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS, TEST REPORTS FROM AN APPROVED LABORATORY ON GRADATION AND PERMEABILITY OF THE BLDG(S), .THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT AND MEET THE INVERT ' ELEVATIONS OF THE SAID UTILITIES. ANY UTILITY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN 5' OF THE ® ~ SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE A5-BUILT SUBMITTAL, 4, PVC STORM PIPE, 12'~ AND SMALLER SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C-900, CLASS 150 BLDG. SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PLUMBING CONTRACTOR, ALL WORK ~ M I STANDARDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SANITARY SEWER TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS 5. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRATES AND COVERS WITHIN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL CODES, ~ M I ORDINANCES AND REQUIREMENTS. CLEARING AND GRUBBING NOTES 1. ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A TELEVISION INSPECTION BY TRAFFIC RATED FOR HS-20 LOADINGS. PAVING NOTES TES THE OWNER'S CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN 6. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SOD THE RL-fENTION/DETENTION POND AS INDICATED ON 1, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTING C( 25, ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AND FINISHED IN A WORKMANLIKE MANNER TO 1, PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING, ALL TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN ON THE CONSTRUCTION ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION. PLANS WITHIN ONE WEEK FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND. PROPOSED JOINTING PATTERI ;ONSTRUCTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT THE CONTRACTOR. IS TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE SATISFACTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH ~ I JOINTING PATTERN TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL, THE BEST RECOGNIZED TRADE PRACTICES, ®RIGlNAL W PLANS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY 5 TREE ORDINANCE AND DETAILS CONTAINED IN THESE PLANS, IT SHALL BE THE 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM AN EXFILTRATION TEST ON ALL GRAVITY SEWERS 7, MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE 2. THE CONTRACTOR 15 TD PRG RECEIVED ~ ~ ACTOR 15 TO PROVIDE A 1/2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL 26. DEVIATIONS TO THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THESE TREES IN GOOD CONDITION, NO INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATION AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY, WITH SEALER, AT ABUTMENT R, AT ABUTMENT of CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE MAY BE CAUSE FOR THE WORK TO BE UNACCEPTABLE. DEVIATIONS SHALL RECEIVE ~ TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE: 100 GPD PER INCH PIPE DIAMETER PER MILE. 3. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS Sh OWNER. TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL. 8. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO THE INVERT TO FOOT STANDARD SPECIFI( NT MARKINGS SHALL 8E MADE WITH TRAFFIC PAINT IN ACCORDANCE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. ~t~J~ 2 ~ ~ V ~ I'I 2, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PREPARE THE SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ACTUAL COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION OF ALL PARTIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S ELEVATION(S) OF THE STORM PIPES(S), TO 8E 4" WIDE PAINTED WH FANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 971-12. PARKING STALL STRIPING ~ 0 ~ i N1DE PAINTED WHITE STRIPES. 27. SIGNS, BUFFER WALLS & FENCES ARE SUBJECT TO SEPARATE SUBMITTAL(S) AND pIANNING DEPARTMENT , CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE, WITH THE SOILS TESTING REPORT. COPIES OF THE RESPONSIBILITY. STORM PIPE SHALL BE SAW-CUT EVEN WITH THE STRUCTURE WALL(S), ACTOR 1S TO INSTALL EXTRA BASE MATERIAL WHEN THE DISTANCE PERMITTING, DEVIATIONS SHALL RECEIVE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER, CITY OF GLEARWATER O®~ ~ SOILS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE OWNER OR THE SOILS TESTING GROUT AROUND PIPES FOR WATER TIGHT AND SMOOTH FINISH, 4. THE CONTRACTOR 1S TO INSi COMPANY QUESTIONS REGARDING SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN 3, ALL FORCE MAINS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE TEST IN BETWEEN THE PAVEMENT ELE TE PAVEMENT ELEVATION AND THE TDP OF THE PIPE OR BELL IS LESS THE SOILS REPORT ARE TO BE DIRECTED TO THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATORY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION, SAID TESTS THAN TWELVE (12) INCHES, ARE TO BE CREATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND SUBMITTED TO THE PAVING, GRADING & DRAINAGE TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ~E (12) INCHES. ® ~ ~ I 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB, ONLY THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE, REGULATORY AGENCY FOR APPROVAL, COORDINATION AND NOTIFICATION OF ALL 5. STANDARD INDEXES REFER T PARTIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY. TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS. NDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FDDT 'ROADWAY AND ~ NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, OR 1, THE STORM DRAINAGE PIPING AND FILTRATION SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A SIGN STANDARDS. " ~~®ss~~ ~ ~ ~ I PLANTED WITH OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF _ CONSTRUCTION. V,. i RACKFII I I 4. THE TOP 4" TO 6" OF GROUND REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS UNTIL FINAL STOCKPILED AT A SITE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT. l PURPOSED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE APPLICABLE TESTING THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAlI P~OP~FRj~Y (OF THE ~r ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR .)S "Ifd ANA k WffI+0UT', , WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. TESTS WILL BE REQUIRED PURSUANT WITH THE THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER, QCOP` Y0NT2Qby` NOT PUBLISHED A3q Y TESTING SCHEDULE FOUND IN THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK, THE SOILS ENGINEER MUST SUBMIT CERTIFICATIONS TO pr r. r11T s 1 THE OWNERS ENGINEER STATING THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET. RAM A. GOEL, PhA, P.E#47431`;~'`, COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLf '3 EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEA I _.._.~,...~„W~ - ® OV ~ ~ a ; O N3 ~ ~i w Z ~t ~ ~ ®~o ~z ~M Z NW DEMOLITION NOTES ~ LEGEND ` ~ Q REMOVE DEMOLITION OF THE SITE INCLUDES THE REMOVAL/ 3A ~1 RELOCATION OF ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN ~ 2 PROJECT AREA, PAVING AND BASE, UTILITY LINES CONCRETE (SANITARY SEWER, STORM PIPES, WATER LINES, 2~ POWER POLES, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND ~ 'L1 j, POWER AND TELEPHONE CABLES, GAS LINES, ASPH. Gc BASE N~ TREES, SHRUBS, ETC.) 'N~ AND IS NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ° a / ~ro EX. SAN, M. N, ~1. REMOVE EX, CURB. ~ i^---_._-•--"~~-^--..`"~''' b3 STOP EL. 21,46 r c ~ ~ , INV. r~'L, 16,&2( ) UfdF_ ~>TOP,Y MA~QNRY l3UlLDING 2. REMOVE EX. CHAIN LINK FENCE, GATES 8c FOOTERS. ~ ~ w LFE = 24,3 ?mq N ~ 2 t q, ROUGH l d ~"r~ ?3. REMOVE STRUCTURES INCLUDING FOOTERS IN ENTIRETY, ~ ASPHALT PAVEMENT / ~ m I, by ~3 ~ NS 4. REMOVE EX. CONCRETE, ~ ~ ~ ? ~ \ ' ~ 1VLSIOIV ~ I 21 I LEMBO SURD , O REMOVE EX. TREES. ®w 0 T o LOTS ~ ~ ro U ~ `il ~6. REMOVE EX. ASPHALT. ~ ~ ~ • I,... ti 9~ 0.5' CONC, CUR!? ~ ti 2 _ r 9/ . _ v+ r - h~ ~ A P H A L l PAVE ___L;OI~G..~_~__._. ~ - C I ~ - ~ I q - - ~ RELOCATE ELEC. POLE & ASSOCIATED WIRING. ~ ~ Sr Z ! ` by ~i , 5 .4 , g 50 .O.W ti d 2. ~8. REMOVE CURBING. ® ~ Cduc . ' 2 I ~ v~ N~, F ~9~ ONE STORY ~ ~Ro~o~ ?9. ALL CAVITY & EXCAVATION RESULTING E~ #5936 ~ 1 No 3 ~ p q 10 - I A ONRY & FRAME BUILDING h 3 I FROM REMOVAL OF TREES, SHRUBS, PIPES, 3 ro Q M S o/ 9 ~ 2 I,~ ni I No, 622 ~ ` ` `,l ~ I 2 ~ s INLETS, GREASE TRAPS, SIGNS AND POLES SHALL 2' FE = 23.4 FLOOR LEVELS VARY) BE FILLED WITH APPROVED SUITABLE MATERIAL CONC, LOAGING DGCK 2 v s ~ ~ `L ~ v N TM I I ~ ~ Q S~ ~o I\ ~ AND COMPACTED IN 12" LIFTS TO 95% OF MAX. DENSITY - sr I I / ~ ~ ~ ^ I Ul F~ 10 OFF-SITE D15P05AL OF STRUCTURES, UTILITIES N ~ t ~ "~J I I ~ u5~ ~p~.m,l~.~m.m~~al.lom,~oA.,~t.~a.,~a.a~~ r~' 0. ~ ' AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS SHALL OCCUR IN SOLID TM I I ` L~J ~ U ~ ::.e. 0 CRL;7E 1 , 'y ~ 1 { e~7 ~Q ~ WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES APPROVED BY F.D.E,P, AND NES COnint ~ 0626 - ~ ~ - ` ~ i ~ LOCAL JURISDICTION'S STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS. ~ - - w J.(iE ~ ~ k0 Drawn By: B.J.V. E~ ~ 2~ o = b2 vAp _2 \ o Linn U t1' Checked By: H.G. 2 k•..... z ~ I z ~ \ ~ 6r N ~ h` w ~ ONW.. U II / ~y a Q ~ / I r I g~ U I ~W ~ 2 4 ~ - - Issue Dates 06/19106 _ Il. o ~ x ~ e o I Revisions: ~ I - ~H>v p ~ 1 1~ Y I I~ I . No. Date Description ~I „ J h'~ W 0 U I I ~W 3 ~ hl ~l I ~ ~ t~ b I ~ V ~ Q yr 2A 2 I I $ h , ~ ~ R; 4i w A 22~ ~ Z W I u~ I ~ a J ~ W T' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I z I g o I tit ~ 'v ~ I I ~ ® I I ~ q i i ~ O -I ~ I I ~ G ~ ~ ~ 0 ti ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ a o n I h j J I ® I o w 2' 2 ~ 0 d, ® m ~ > iaY G 2 X I W© 2 ~ n, a ~ 5 I ~ N 4' CHfVN LINK FENCf ~ . bb ~ ~ ~k b / .p 4.7 b r ] - - 3 I 1 n~ ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ~ 2~' ¢ 0 L2 26.5 2' I p 9 ~y. z hA ~ MErAL y~ _ . _ ,tb Js° 2 a FRAME 2 ONE STORY T FENCE TYP. ~ ORIGINAL SNED MASONRY BU2DlNG S!L ( J t e ° LFE = 28.6 cGNCkErE 0 RECEIVED ~ a ~ u ~ 0 ~ 3 p ~;!!G 2 9 2006 0 y~ '.2~ 6h 1~ ~ 2 Ip~ ® E~!. SAN. ~M.FI. ~ , ~ ~ b ~ INV EL. 20.21 N PLANNING DEPARTf~ENi 5 70P EL <„30 CITY OF CLEARNI,ATER - - ~ 1 0 ~ 2b• ~ LLM00 SUBDIVISION ~ 3p 0. b LOT ,5 ~ ~ 2 2 ~ h~"~~®ra®m®®®®® o 2 ?1` ~ n. 1 b~ b~ ~ 2 d 2b ,ZA `~i~ PAl..M ,Lb 2b h' ,Z1 21 ~f~ E;~1~' 1 2 2 M ~ a i I® v W ® SCALE.' 7 "=20' ~ ~ W~ J W ®I ~ c~a ZO 0 10 20 I 40 .,iii""!!~~. THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAl'--TbE ~ROhBRTY" f~.THE r ENGINEER AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR,lli ' R AN WAY ITHOUT;. THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER, QCOP`4?IGI~ >00,6~1 '~ULISHEfl w . M LINE TABLE 41 l S 89°13'49'- (P&M) 120.00' y ' ' is o L L2 N 89' 13'49 "W (P&M) 120.00'AUG 2 C2.1 L3 N 00°15'59"E (P&M) 140.00' RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P.E. COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VA015" ME 51., d (t 01 EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S S ' " • . " ^ ~ ~ M~ , Q o0 d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ "z Z s~ ~ ~ ® roo a~ Z P~ ~ Z t ~ . Z J C`- C r ~ / 0I`!E .,IDP,Y M/~,~ONRY' i;CUlLD1NG ~ R n u c x ~ LFE = 24..3 ~ ASPNAIT PAVE~UENT ,~j Z M I~~ / ~ Z ~ ~ P v oia ~ ~ PLASTIC COATED I.EMBO S(IBDfV1.SlON % ~ Z v CHAIN LINK FENCE ~ ~ ~ v ~ 6 HIGH IYP, L o r 8 Fl o / ~ r` ~ ~ ~'t O.S' CONC. CURB _ ASFNALT PAVE"MENT --=~F;--=-','- - Z ~ J~ , 1 29,1 ' S0' , D,W. 5,2 ~t i d~ d v< I C------ ~ ~ ~ E~ #5936 ~ calve. LnAniNC noca J In o E 2 TRY TOWNH M S o TM ~ 1 CAR ~ ~ _ `0 GARAGE ~ NEW 4' WIDE ~ ~ i ~ CONC WALK ~ '4 ~ • TM ' ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ - U ~ ~ T r NEW 20x20' ~ ~i ~ ~ ~1CH VLSI IL1TY TRIANGLE I 0 NES Comm„ 0626 F_. ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~Ah~G ~ ~ ~ TYP,) rb ~ Drawn By: B.J,U. ro ~ ~ I ~ ~ 0' ~ ,0 Y~' 10' 10% U n 10'x]0' RASH ~ ~ 10 10 ` .0 1 ~ .0 ~ ~ ~ STAGING BAR ~ cry I ~ ~ ~,i ~ 5 R R 5 R Checked By: H.G. T W ~ II ~i',. ' 4 ll; r~ ~.W ~ ~ , ~ I ~ . . - - V ~ i ~ ~ NEW 4 WIDE ®v ~ ~ .i - - - Issue Date: 06119106 i0 ~ I 6R1CK PAVERS N ~ ~ ~ N t(• ~ ~ ~ r. I ~I J ~ S Revisions: eo ~r ~ "s 1 No, Date Descri tion U ~I ~ N W MP T ~ S K E DU S ER 10 ; .0 + 10' ~ 10' .0 ! 0' 10' Q - 10' X 12' X 6" CONC, ~I ~ ~ I ~ W 6' H1GH BLOCK ¢ ~ ~ a w i NLCLOSURf TO MATCH ~ ~ ; OV HAG w I ~ a UILDINC DE5IGNED BY ~i ~ r;' THERS), ~ ~ c ~ ~ I ~ •r ~ ,,~t ~ NEw 2 sroRr 1 cAR ~ ~ 0 rOWNNOMES -t o"~ ~ ~r_ 0 I ~ °J ~ ~ o I Ica W u ~:o: NEW 4' CONC. U ~ ~ -o SIDEWAL I m Q ~ ~U a 2 10,0' ~ 15.0' ~ ~ ti iq 75.7 29,3' - ~ ~ - - 4 -®y J z ~ METAL_ _ , 2 ~ DECORATIVE ~r FkAME OPJE STOP,Y PVC FENCE SHED ~ 6' HlCH TYP. e z MASOlJRY BllILDING ~ ~ ! ®RIGlNAL ° LFE = 20.6 r ~a is Ert. 1 No, 705-707 RECEIVED I ;°~G 2 9 2~~~i I PLANNING DEPARTMENT I LEt~~eo su~~alVlslor~ CITY OF CLEARNIATER Lor s ~ 1 - TREE LI-GEND = EAh' t® t~ ~ ~ ' ~ ®I v~ SCALE. 1 "=20' ~ ~ J N ~ 20 0 70 40 ~ ~ 20 THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN TH PR T ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED OR USED,'IN'ANY WY WffWO~ THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. QCOPYRIGAT`fl006'N~T ~LNLWFP'•• LINE TA8LE : • ` L l S 89' 13'49'- (P&M) 120.00' 4 7 4 3 1 *C3m I L2 N 89' 13'49 "W (P&M) 120,00' 2006 " L3 N 00'15'59"E (P&M) 140,00' RAM A. GOEL MD.-, P.E. #471,431 , SjATE OF ~ r!; e COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID `UNI L$ , EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEERS,SvS~AI"a~ ,~w'(~ h~.a a aY1e M~ ® ~ ~ m~ z PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION CANTERBURY LLC 1 1135- PASADENA AVENUE SOUTH, # 2D8 ~ ' I' f'. a r~ i ~ .F. ;H;, SOUTH PASADENA, FL. 33707 Z ~ r. - r ~ h s CONTACT :KEITH J. BREADING ~ r ~ (727)- 302-9007 ~ ® n0 ~ ~ EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ ~ v~ LOTS 6 AND 7, MAP OR PLAT ENTILTED "LEMBO SUBDIVISION" AS $ ~ RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 48, PAGE 0 ~ 38 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS, ~ CO. FLORIDA ~ Z SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 29S ,RANGE 15 E e ~ l/ V ONF >TDP,Y MASONRY BUILpING LFE = 24..E % ROUCH Z a~ fv ASPHALT PAVEhlEP1T Z ~ G LEMBO SUBDIVISION ~ u~ LOT 8 p ~ 1 ASPHALT P .4 V E' M E id I -==---~--=.ry~ _._.__.r.at~_^..--~- - ~ J-- - conc. ' Z - - ~ fr, ~ ® ® ® a® ® i - - ~ 5.33' ~ 5.OD' ~ ~ 5.00' ~ 5.00' ~ ~ 5.33' 50 ,O.W. l~ zo cNE a N cor 1 cor 2 cor 3 for 4 cor 5 , m A ~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ v~ ~ ~ 3 - 3 c E ~ #5936 ~ CONC. 1UA~IA~G DUCK v ~o 3 3 a~ ~ C am bb' p ~0 °OM ~ V . V~ ~O V'~ X00 ~ Z p o,~p ~bM po,~ god ~ i ~ 2 ~ ~Z ~Z ®o ~ ~O 2 ~ 582.5 SF 570 SF 570 SF 570 SF 582.5 Sf , ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ - I ~ C) 3B9 f3 9 E 5.8913 E; S.8913 5.8913 .5.89'13 E - ~ NES Comm.: 0626 ~ ~j ~ i .33~' 15,00 15.OD 15.00 13,33 m p ' ~ ~ Drawn By: B.J.V. n 4 ~ ~ , ~ LYE ;Q~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ Checked By; H.G. rC ~ , 'Z ti-" l~.I W U ~ Il I; ct; COMMON AREA , , ~ rJ ~ ~ .l 7 7, 050 SF ~ - - Issue Dade: 06119106 - ~ - ~ ~ Revisions: No. Date Descri tion { n.. ~ a 5.8 ' 13 4,9 E. S.8 l3 4,9 E. S.8 13 4, f. 5.89'13 4,9 E. 5.89'13'4 E. • • ~ a ~ _ 33 _ . 0 5 i - ~ a ~ , . 582.5 SF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 3 ~ 570 5F 0 570 SF ~ 70 SF ~ 581.5 SF ~ q~j~ G O 3 .3 ~ I ~ ~ A eoD 03 ~A mw e3 ~ ~ ~h p o ~ 0 ~ ~ ipp 2 Or'1 p'^ ' OM ~ ~ 4i ;rm ° 2 2 ° ~ p ~ i~ u °°r7 2 Z .n.. 4 UJ 0 0 0 ~ D ..q, ~ 9 ~ S A ~ 0 cars cor 7 cor s cor 9 cor ID 0 ~ ~ ~ 5.89'134,9 E. 5.89'134,9 f, 5.89'134,9 E. 5.89'134,9 E. S.89'134,9 E Q i - L2 a MEIA(_ - _ _ _ - ~ FRAME OPJE STORY Q ~ 5NE!7 rVIASOrvRY BUILDING ° 1 LFE = 28,6 conrchErf No, 705-707 r-. L~~MBO SUBDIVISION ORIGINAL LOT .5 ~ ~ RECEIVED 2 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER M ' M w ® J ~ 20 D 10 20 ~ 40~} ,~ftJ THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL jgEMAIN. THE\F~OPERTY ~f TFSE' e ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED 611 USED WANY WAY WY~JTN~{OUT'," ' THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. QCO*RIGH,1 200F~+I~T4M6L~I~ED LINE TABLE L1 S 89°1349"E (P&M) 120.00' AUK 2006.E W ate.... ' ' L2 N 89' 13'49 "W (P&M) 120.00' ,C3m2 L3 N 00'15 59 E (P&M) 140,00 RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P.E. 94 . , , . ; COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID UNLESS'/O,ll, EMBOSSED WITH THE SIGNING ENGINEER'S SEAL'dry-;yjg3T''; z STORM SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE 0 0~ ~ m ~ . STRUCTURE# STRUCTURE TYPE OP ELEV, INV, ELEV, STORM SEWER LINES SCHEDULE CONTROL STRUCTURE ~ MODIFIED TYPE "C" 23,05 19.0 STRIICIRRE TC ~ WATERTIGHT OPENING STRRCTUAE LERCTH (Ff) PIPE SIIE PIPE ttPE SLOPE 2 THROUGH POND WAL 20'90 ~ ® N 3 TYPE "C" INLET 23,3 O - 17 15" RCP 0,88% ~ ~ le ~ , F.D.O,T. INDEX 232 21,05 n ~ 17' 15" RCP 0.88% I ~ 9! ~ WATERTIGHT OPENING `~::1! 4 TTYPEG CP WDLETAL 20,90 V 60~ 15" RCP ~ CAST IRON GRATE 2-1/2"x2" ANCLE IRON R V V 0,33% U.S,FOUNDRY #6212 FRAME WITN 8 NELSON EL, 21.60 SNDS F,D,O,L INDEX 232 23.5 21,25 ~ - 6 2D~ 15" RCP ~ DRYWELL/BUBBLER ~ ~ 0,50% ~ ~ 2-~4 CONTIN, BOX 21,6 18,90 ® py Q 8" MAS. BLOCK FILL WITH CONC. d ~ ~4 ~ 2'-0"x3'_1" ~ ~U 18"D.C. 18" RCP INV, EL, 18,90 Z J000 psl CONC, 6" 6" ~ n~ a '3A mL •i(`u ~ r:~i' - 4 ONTIN. , ' ' 2 ~ C 1, ~Q. Z Q CLEAN 3/4" R ER GRA EIyT 0 ~ Z1 22 STRUC RE ~I 6 DRYWE L DETAIL N,T,S, EX. SAN. M, H, b9 i a ~ OI~IE STORY MASONRY BUILDING ~b 2g fi/ sr. SOP EC. i1,Ob~~ 0 M 2 r, ~ ~ / 15tH EL 6.791 LEE = Z~„) rb9 2 2~ ~ .rl- ~ 1MV. ~12L. 1b,E?Z(E) Zt. RCUGH ~ it ~I b~' y~ ASPHALT PAVEMENT ~ ii ~ ~ ~3 PA ~ 23 ~ • ~ ® ~'i i Dj1V1~ • ~ J Z ~ ! LEMBO SUBDIVLSlO1V ~ ~ LI.I ~ / ~ 2~ ~ ~ w L(.T B ~ ti ~ F~ N O ~ n~ W r~ N/~ ~o ti "r~ N ,32 0,5' CONC. CURB i N.2~ l9! . Nrv ASPHALT PAVEMENT _-'`.3=_ - - - 2r . _ - r~~ ~ - - 4 o ~ ~ .nr? ,ivy y , i TRAFFIC GRATE ~ 2 „N 22 6K'9 5D ,D.W. ry ELEV, 23,05 F` , n, A ~ 8" MASONRY OR ~ 22 APPROVED R,C. GREASE SKIMMER ~ N ® I PREFAB (SEE DETAIL) ~ 0 ~ O ® W BOTTOM OF SLOT b ~ r'~ ®4 ELEV. 21,BD 23 2~ p? M ~ ~ 3 I ~ d ` E #5936 ~ ~ 1e RcP 2~ •~r E 2 TRY TOWNH M S q~ a ~I~1t~z»?'dHj;; ~ ~ CUNC. LOADfNG DOCK k ' ~ INV. ELEV. 19,0 ~ TM FL. E EV = 2 3 NN ~ W ~ c~ 3'x3'x4"THICK ti4~:x=~M',~ih~,~:J'' ~ ~ 6" ~aX ° W A NfW S EWALK & conic sine ''x~' NEW CV ~ „ ~ N NfW H C RAMP 1 ' 1, EL. 2D,J0 ~ , ~ N„ (TYP) 21 CF F 4" SAN ~ ~aa © PER Clh' INDEX J : ; . _ ~o a, PVC ®2% SLOPE / a ~ bh ~ ~ O _V_ ~'-'~.~-'u_-r-r . Lu T (TYP,) ,y ~ W/]RU ICAIED DOMES. q ,I' ~ ~ L ® PER .O.T INDEX iYj ~ - - =4. _ ~ Ir'~J.. ' t.~ o, Pq`' 0 1 XI ~ 1 raj 3O c~ ~ J,J _ _ _ - _ ~ - _ u_ Y _ ~-i N ES Comm.: 0626 q q I~ I rd's' I I i EW PAD ~ I ~ , <.:.>~>>..c::~~'_,. W ~ SAN MH I '1 I I ~:23k- m ~ \ ~ ~ - I 1 '1 22.EFi ~ NEW I O n~ r u• M ELEV 23,4 I I "xs E- .0. O co MODIFIED TYPE C ~ ~ ~ , 2 I ,,ft, I n I - I ' ~ ~ J37 LF OF 8" Pvc 8 m ~ 4l ELEV. 19.0 I Z'9' I ~P ZN' I I I I PLS , • O o SAN. S ER ®0.5J3: ~ CONTROL STRUCTURE q R ~ - I _ _ P~ ~ - Drawn By: B.J.V. N.rs, q~ Z ~J Lrj . I I I ~ I I ..E1.93 ? ® I ~ •J 't I~ n'I I I I i 't' fi z ~ ~ T`~ I,~ 23,8 `~_~_a L~ .L.®~ ~ II ~ I ~ ~ E~ 2~.0 -----I- - . checdced By: M.G. 4. ~ - I 11~ i I "9 v ~ R ~li~ ~ I -5 , - Ir 23.5 , N,~~© I ~ ._-___9.~_ [L ly. I I I II_ _ 1 I _ JI ~u ~ d ---fl--6, ~ I - 23, 3 ~ - a.iv~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ti I I I I 23,81 I I 3 e I - - - ~c~4~~~_-. Issue Date, 0619106 - o----. U? 1 - I I I• ~ i I I I I I ~ NEW 1 ~ ~ ° ~ DOGHOUSE MH ' W J nI o I PAL ~ - i _ ~ _ 23.7 ® ~ RIM EL 2J.5 ~.0 - ===s Revisions: O ~ .I 23.8 - - - ~ - = 'S tl ~ F~D V RlFY.3f _ - ' 9 ~ E Date Descri tion - - G - - ~ ~ PRIOR TO ,I - I I I I G.. CONSTRUCRON W _ 4D F A _ _ ° ® ~jn 1 I 8 1~ 4~ a~, I I PVC P I I x J ~ 27. w I - - - I I BOW • ~ I a I - I (TYP 0 I I ~ ~ ~ a I!~~!i~~ _ 1 I 1 ~ T - - - - 5x7 ® ~ o ® ~ I ' t.. _ ' ~ ° k,1 ~ , ti Q CONC. 5 I1 -a ~ ~ -T ~ v, PAD ® I ~ 22.0 - - - - - ~ a t`~ ~ ~ ° • ' ~ I NEW 2 STORY PLS, TYPJ M , ~ B ry ~ B ~ ~ TOWNHOMES E ~ ® ~ ~ aI~ a a I FL ELEV. - 24, (5 PL . v, d ~ pay-~ ~ ~ ~ o< ~ u a I ~s9 2 A „ ~ A o I ~O INTERCEPT®R SWALE W ~ ~ ~ 20.0 - o -----300f~ -PS ~O I:~ I o SECTION A°A 2,. a , ® F~ o ~ N,T. S, W ® W ~ A q r\ ~ `A' © b ~g _ Y__~_~. N~ ~ ® ® ® / `2 43 - - - - 9 - _ 2y ~ ® ® ~ I iy~ t ,A~ ~ L2 ,z a 2y ~ META! „ A ~Z6• I ~ ~ FRAME 1 `'TORY i6" 1 5NED Oh E ~ SILT FENCE TYP. ; f a ~ MA50l1RY BUILDING ~ ~ - 7 1.g ~ lFE = 28,E ~ n coN RETE ~ Z~r 2b. No, 705-707 1 p u~ ~ NOTE. r 2N. L-_: _ `..r-____~~_ RECEIVED a ~ a NO LANDSCAPING WITHIN 1 OF b ~a n yy a ~ 9 206 THE FLOWLINE OF THE SWALE. 2~~ z~, ~ ° D F~. SAN. ~wN. 2 P~I,Af~~II~aG ~?EPA><~TME • ti 2h ® TOP EL. 14, 30 Cli'~c~l CLCt`I~VPr~iti°~ • Zb LEMBO 11/1`'1 I ® ~ ;NV, EL. 20.21(A1) ~ suBn ~ vN b LOT 5 ® 2 ® ,fir 2N' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\~,4~~~~mmaemmmm®®® q1 ` ~ 2 b~ 1 h p SECTI®I~ TRU DRIVEWAY 2~ 4n ~ h ~ ,Z 1 ~ 2b a~ THEE LEGEND. 1°~ ' 1 2~ i' ~ 2 2 SCALE ~ 10' HORIZONTIAL 1'A!_)V! SCALE : 'I = 2 VERTICAL ~.VS = E~1R ~ BANK OF (10 TYP, J"METERS & BFP~ TOP OF SKIMMER ELEV. 22.80 I 2 ' P/L ~ n ' NEW 6" D.1. NEw s" D.r.P k 70P OF CRATE . , POLYWRAPP~ POLYWRAPPED ~ ~ ELEV. 23.05 ~ 1 ' ' - 36" MIN, Cl 36" M1N, COVER ~ ~ ~ ~ CHLD 1 I I r - - - - - - - ~ NEW ~ ESN 2" PVC DOM WATER INJEL CHLORINE TER INJECTION ~ TOP OF BANK ~ i ~ i I I ~ 6"x2" TEE ® 36" MJM. COVER pOJN EL. 23.30 TOP OF WEIR POINT TOP Of WALL ELEV, 22.20 I I I 1 ®®®m®®®®®Q81~® EL, 23,30 _ ~1~ I-.~. I? 11IU1=JU1=m _I I_~ a ~ I ; ' 1 ~ ®®i~ ®®®m ®m I - `u-ml=m: = ~ 18 I I L---- --J II = IB .-1111 ^'IIU-IIIL.II I ~ 1 ~ ® NEW FHA ~ NE TO BE SODDED 4.8~ I I 6 ®RUSH THRU I 1 NEW ~~a reo & 9 (r, 6X4" TEE FA ~ ~ (TAP & VALVE) , ~ ~ ~ SP ~r r = ~ k ~ n 6 ® NEW ~'s BOTTOM OF f~n~~L• $ ; 6x4 NEW .y ~ ~ 6x4" TEE ; ~ ~ POND EL. 20.90 l~~~ri ® (TAp (TAP & VALVE) ;r WEIR CREST ' ' EL, 21.80 NEW 6° D.LP, ~ 5P SCALE. 7 "=20' ® ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~ BOTTOM OF SKIMMER PO YWRA P i~p1' ELEV, 21.30 1 P fD A ~ I 1=__ I _ _ %>v, 36" MlN, COVER ~ I e GREASE BAFFLE TO BE NEws"D.r.P. „ POLYWRAPPfD .NEW 6"O.LP. ~ POLYWRAPPED 1/4 THICK ALUMINUM , 3s"MIN, COVER- 36"M1N, COVER 9~ ~ 1(1 ~n nn I"• ~ ~ i.,,-. ,.r,-~, _ W/JIHIIVLtJJ JIttL HNl. F1VK.` -c 'ff NTS 9.6' 10' N TS THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND SHALL RFMA, yE'pROPE fiY 0E''f>,_E i ENGINEER, AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, PUBLISHED.O~~ USED -IN'AR W AY WIkNbUP• r SLOT -I- GREASE THE CONSENT OF THE ENGINEER. ©COPY.RIGHTJoorVNOT PUBLI D • ' LINE TABLE No q~4 L l S 89°13491E (P&M) 120.00' i~ POND CROSS SECTION BAFFLE DETAIL L2 N 89'1349"W (P&M) 120.00' AUGS24455 SECTION B-B N.T.S. L3 N 00-15'59't (P&M) 140.00' P N.T.S. RAM A. GOEL, Ph.D., P.E. #41 @Y ! n ~0.• F COPIES OF THESE PLANS ARE NOT VALID' UN1~55 • EMBOSSED WITH THE. SIGNING ENGINEER'S' SEAL ~y.. . la ~ W 0 'I Ul ~ - (Y m } ~~~t W d ~-0 z zo 0 ~Q~a ~ z ~ o ~~u p~z Q ~ zg ~ u- ar ~40u~ ~ ~ z o tx ~ LL c o Q o ~ r~ Q Y i m~ E ~ Q ~ O O ~ z q i p a a~~ 9 R y~l-Su z l u ~ n I n 1 n lb -4 1~ -0 15 -0 15 -0 d ~ ~ ~ z ~d 35 3~{ (A 35 SN 35 SN 35 8N 5SN 35SH ~ 'r v ~ o p ~ d I ~ I I I I I I I I I - 1 - I I W.LC. - I _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~u~ 1 T I I N N I N I I I I ~ Q~~r~' I I I I I I y~ O z } r Z ~ m d~ ~T ~ 00 w 0 dz -i o~i ' 91-4" C~Il.INCx ^ GARP~t l~U~~~o ~~m~~ ~~~a 2'-BI' 1'-8" 2'$I' Z'•BII 2'-S'I 2'-811 ~'-81' 2-811 .8n ~~.8n 2,.Bn ~i.8n ~3Atl-I 0 Q. 3 ~ oa ° ° as ° oo ° ao a1Y ° oi}o ~ 2 ~ N Q e _ _ oz~ Q Q - ~ Q N z - ~ ~ 4 4 _ :4 4 m m m m m N Z 0 m I. 0 9 -8 I~ O 'Q Q.. V I w a i ~I ~ p, ~,~I - 5 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 * a~ ~c _ v~` i ~ e~ 0 G - ~ ~ 1=0Y~R - Q a n ~ ~ C ~ ~F z X 4 _ ~ m ~ ~ 0 3 Z ~ D ~ m a a. ~ I u 31-011 31-011 3-0 3'-0" p 3'-0" ~ Q ~ 3 d I I ;i i II a I i I I GOV~R~D i. i i I - I 0 , I i ~ ~ ~TITRY I i I I i i I Sl~u 1 n SI-0° S~-0° II ii ~~-0~~ i I ~ ~ r I I I I I QQ I I I I I O I 41-~I' II-CSI' -0" I I I ~ I I ~ z o ~0~m I I II I I 1 I I -O I I ~ ~ , 1 I I I ~ z~ - ~ p 0 0 0 ~ o 0 ~~Q~~ 00 ~ NOtE: ~ NNIN COMM tb ~ 3 tN U 10 PI~4 C~ ~N R 1ST ~LOOfi~ LIYINC~ 325 ~Q~T w AUG-2-2006 2ND ~~OOR ~IVINC~ 582 SQ~t Q tOt~4L 1.IVINCx 9Ort SQ~t ~ p pY S~~~t N0. ~i?ONt ~Nt~ I 2S SQ~t ®RIGINAL , RECEIVED V C~~~~Cx~ 195 SQ~t z 03 ZD06 ~ PLANNING DEPARTNI~,NT TOTAL UNDER ROOF 1130 SQFT CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ o ~m flx ~ m > ~ ~ w ~,Q-o ~ zo 0 x4~a Q ~z~o ~zu a~z ~ zg ~ U pr 4 0 ~ U ~ z 0 (K - - o m' ~ Q z U ffi ~ E 7 Q (Q Q 0 0 ~ Y '~o 00 o~~ a R z 75'-8.. ~u ~ w 1~'-4" 1~'-0" 15'-0" 1~'-0u z ~d x you u u ~ ~ p }gym z C n o Z ~ o v D w 14'-4"X 11'-0" s'-o" cEIL O~o~~ CARPET ~~=~o ~~m~~ ~~~~a BREAKFAST SAR I I I I I DISNI ~ ~ I I I o 0 I I o o I I I I ~ o I I h-----1 I I h-----1 I I I I I I I p 0 I ~ ' ~ . I I I 0 0 I I ~ I I ~ ~ h-----i ~ h-----i I I o o I I I I PL4NNINC~ KItCN~N o;o o to o to COMMENtg ~ 3 tIL~ I I ~10 ~10 4 I I Oz~Z ~ o ~ ~ NzW - °I~ °I° o 0 0 0 0~ ~ ~ o~ ~ m as as ea 0a as Be aB ae aB as 4 I I I W D I ~ D W ~ D W I D lU I I I I m - - - ~ I I - - - I - - - I ~ ~ D • ~ ~ > 4~U a 0 0 ? 0 0 0 W P NNINCx AIR ~ ~ p p ~ ' o ~ ~ o Nau~ V ~ V GO MkTlts # 3 O O tf~ z z d o ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I z ~ ° ~ a I I I I I I I m A ~ ~ a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 I I I I / I I I I 0~ ` I I I I I I I I I I I I 12'-4" X 10'-4" I I I I I I I I 8'-0° rill. I I I I I I I I CARPET I I I I I I I I I I I 1ST FLOOR LINE I I ~ ~ ~ ---I- - " I I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I ~zoa ~ I I I I I I I I ~O~m ~ z~~~ - ~ a! 0 ~ ~ o ~ o ~~Q~~ D O O O a u ~ n Oo 00 ~ m c~ A ~1 SN~~~' N0. ®RIGINAL , rt RECEIVED z FtUU PLANNING DEPARTMENT N CITY OF CLEARWATER tn~ 0 o~ ~ ~ ac ~ ~~o w boo ~ Q d~~ ~ z N o !;i ~~u ~Q~z ~ Q PROVIDE PLATFORM G ON ROOF FOR HYAC UNIT z° ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ VERIFY SIZE WITH MFGR ~ u - ° crQ ~d0~ U~ ~ ~rr-~~I w ~ 0 OL ~~z~ TOP OF ROOF _ ® ® ~ _ - _ - - L~ - J L=J_ - - 1 ° ~ ° 3 of m TOP OP WINpOWB ~n z' OUTSIDE STUCCO OVER PLYWD (wD ~ ~ ~ _ tAPED a SANDED E 7 Q ~ O ~ 1/2" DRYWALL INSIDE x ~ i ~ 2x6 WALL: ~ ggg~ ~ ALL SHEARWALL'b jj} - TYPICAL 2ND FLOOR z ~ ~ {3) GOATS b/8" STUCCO PER- ASTM G926/i i ASTM G946/C1063 ~ O O L 4 LL TOP OF WINpO 8 - 3'-O" z ~ ~ ~Q ~ _ o~ Q z ~d ~ # ~ u , X ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~5 ~ ~o v ~ P ~ ~rQ}~F n ~ ~ m ~~~m~ 6 -O z-~m 1~~°~m o ~ o D O 0 ~ ~ mdi n ~ n QI_ ac ~ ~ o~~ w oz~ 15 -0 15 -0 15 -0 15 -o 1~'-0" 15'-O" a n ~ ~ d~U (7YPIGAL) , u i n ~ n ~ n i n cLaY PIPE ~ -2 5 -4 6 -2 5 -4 5 -4 6'-2" ~ ORNAMENTAL a i ~ u n i i n ~ u ~ u i n n 10 8 I-0 1 8 I-0 1- i- 1-O 0 - 0 0 0 m ~ TOP OF ROOF TOP OF ROOF tOP OP ROOF 0 ~ ~ ~ - top oa: Rood _ Z Z ~ ® ® ® ® ~ Z ~ ~ TYPICAL IST FLOOR ® ® ~ a ~ ~ a STUCCO OVER tOP OF WINDOWS - - - - - - - _ _ _ top OF WINpoWS _ _ CONG. SLOGK ` (2) GOATS 7/8° ?C~? ?C~? ?C ?0? STUGGO PER-ASTM G926/G1063 - - • 0 ~ 4 P ~ ~ r' ~ ~ 'd' in N ~ = TOP OF 2ND FLO N O t o~ 2Np ~I.ooR 1- b' - I ~ z 0 0 ~ 0 ~ m - ~ , m top o~ wlr~ows ~ ~v ~ ~ ~ 1L tOP OF DOORS 0~ DOORB ~ ~ 1~' ~ ~ z ~ ~ o I ~0~ DD ~~z~N i Q~ - i ~0 0~ D®D = ~ ~ ~ u~ip~u~ D®D DD ~ ~c ~0 ~0 000 00 ~ r ~ ~0 000 DD 00~ oo 0 0 - - - 3 m ~ Q ~1 0~ C~ Q Q ~ ORIGINAL ~O~ II 1 II RECEIVED ' NN~~NNNN~N~~ ~ , 0 3 Boas z _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT A-3 CITY OF CLEARWATER N ln~ O 0~ ~w ~ _ a ~ Q 0 ~ x QOp Q 4 ~z PROYIpE PLATFORM =~~o ~ ON ROOF FOR NVAC UNIT Q~Q d vERIFY size Wlr++ rlwR z ~ U U- Q~ 4 ~ +E 3 1.a 4$ - P - ~40~ U~ GD - ~ w U 0 IY z ~z~ fir ,i~ ~ ~ ® ® - 70POFROOF `o ~ a ~ p ° o z ~3 Q pl ~ OUTSIDE STUCCO OVER PLYWD O to d SANDED ~ ~ 1 PED n 1/2 DRYWALL INSIDE ~Q = m € 2x6 WALL: ~i ALL S+~eARWALL'S = dl o~ Q , t 2 3 F 00 S _ i~ TYPICAL ND AND RD L R a x i (3)GOATS5/8"STUCCO P>:R- ASTM C926/G1063 31-011 - - z ~ ~ ~ lU Q ~ ~ _ TYPICAL 1ST FLOOR 4 T d~ z ~d STUCCO OVER , U~, , CONC. BLOCK ~ (2) COATS 7/8" x STUCCO PER-ASTM C926/GI063 ~ ~ ~ ~ LL U ~ I.A' ~g ~ ~ 0 P ~M U U ~ ~ Q } ~ ,i d ~ ~ u~i " ~ ~'-o° -i m ~ z ~LLm -l Q ~ eo a a a D O 0 ~ ~ md~ pL~~~a u ~ u / IAINAAN~NNMN~N~N~M~ o~~ tou>~Ra ~ ~ z at ~RONt a N z ~ I II I II I II I II 15 -0 15 -0 15 -0 15 -0 I5~-O~~ I5~-O~~ ONLY ~ ~ ~ O ~ dU.U { T'fPICAL) ~ (0~-2° CLAY PIPS 10" SI II-OII 11- II 11- II II-OII II 1111 II II-OII II 10" ORNaM~NtAL j - - ----o_ ' O B Q iY1 ~i p ` ~ Q) J toP of RooF z z ~ toP o~ RooF toP of RooF ToP of Roo ~ B ® ® ® ® 3 ' z ~ ° ® ® a k ToP of WINDOws - - - toP of wlr~DOws ~ Q ~ ~ 4 Q r M W 1 c~ ~ - Q ~ ~ ~ ~ _~~n Jib N TOP OF 2ND FLO N T P OF 2ND FLOOR = ~ ~ r ~ ~ Z Q O ~ Oc~m ~ ,m toP of alNDOws toP OF U1INDOW6 0 +tF ~ ~ - ~ TOP OF D00 S T P OF DODRS , _ ~ n ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~az~~ ~ ~~w~ Q~ a1 = ~ ~ Q ~ ~ r I r ~ - a0 3 ~ - - ~ m ~ Q ° ~ ° ~ o 0 S~~~t X10. II ~ II ORIGINAL ~t NN~NNNNNN~~ RECEIVED Z tiIG 0 3 2006 A-4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT N CITY OF CLEARWATER Iln~ O - I. ~ i v I F L ~ o ~ N L d' ~ d' I o w I I~ N ~ IJ- ~~MU~° ~ I- M ~ m Q ZaNn~UM N ~~cJ~~ 0 2 ii ~~J 7X~ Lp~U II Qom z ~L V ~L j 4~' D > Ur \o Q U) i' LuJI ~ ~ ~ ~ z i =z~r~..o ® I-.m ~ coi>-m ~ ~ ~ ~ d'W r~:maU i ~Mij I~°~pI.L O~(vaOW~ N ~ ~r~ d' ,I ~~~~~J~U ~JI N W ~ ~ U v ~.n .L :.i aQ I w r i / ONE STORY MASONRY BUILDING I LFE 24,3 ROUCH j ASPHALT PAVfNENT i ~ ONE Z4 ~ ~ FENCE CORNER ~ ~ 0,455,4'E LOT 8 fIP 3/4" Z PRM (P) ~~yy ~ FCM 4'z4" ~ °~V ASPHALT PAV D.5'CONC.CURB m~ a MENT \ _ a~4, ~Z ................,;.......•...,......,:..:.,..,..:CONCri•rir 25 (P) f!R 5/8" i J ~ ~ 19,5'•e: • 77,3' y 0,105,0.01'E ~ ~ J ' ~/BT 0,5'S C NC. BT 0.3'N a ~ 1 :.:...s;.:.:: 3,0 3.3' 19.9' 1 J~0 al 1 19. \ \~.6 ~ } /ONE, STORY ~eo~ MASONRY & ,FRAME BUILDING y ~ ~ i ~ FENCE END //////////iNo, 622~~~~~~/~ ~ 4.6'E ~ 0 `i~~:2'~oriq;;:~;gapiN' Dock:':::.`:::::.::::: ~ N LFE = 23.4 (FLOOR LEVELS VARY) o 0 o G... ~ rM w ~ m ~ ~ ' U) ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ 65.4' i ,~a. O u.~ W ATM y ° O J p o ¢ n Q ~ ssue Date; N ~''1 ~ ° 0.T .;er. iie i:CONCRETE rr~ ao U) 0 (9 ~ ~ r::e .,rr :,r 120 19,9' Revisions; O W ~ ~ CONC• CURB ~ p I,, No, Date Descri tion c ~ ~ O ~ W 0.5 CONC• CURB ~ Q I Ll J ~ m MO ~ ~ 13.T ' J a i_._ , J o - - - ~ r` .U ~ ~ 0 L U ,N ~ a Q L._ , II ~ ~ FIR 5/8" W 0~~ ~ ~ ti ® 3 j N ~ ° ~ •PlATTEO LOT LfNE p21'{y` ~ U _C1 J ~ m ~ 2 3 n ~ Q ~ ~ O ~ ~ LJ W OHly O ~iy Q ~ Q x ~ ASPHALT CORNER 0.3'F J 0 2 m 0 I ni W v 3 x Z z \ Q O ~ ,~1 ~ I,' ~ ~ vY j W a ,l ~ IY a ~u, 2 ~ ~ • V) ~ o W S J L~ ~ 2. e ~ 0 L~ / W ~ ASPHALT 0, 1'f 2 ° ~ ~ O W 2. 4' CLF ~ ~ LOT 6 ~ ~ / ~ \ ~ i Q ~ a ~ ~ o O LD ~ ; , " D I•n z ~ ~ lfl . W W ° r, ~ W 3 ~j W ASPHALT 0.2E ~ ~ t0 i ~ - O Q ~ 3 , a`~,., Q N FENCf \ FENCE CORNER 5,3N,4.8'E CORNER 13.5' 4' CHAIN NK FENCf 4.5 N N ~ NW WALL CORNER • \ ~ FCM 4'x4" 0.1S,5.OE ¢ CONC. CORNER 0.7'N 2 LZ FOUND 25'(P) ~ ,METAL t `.:::~:x_cur.:.:,.~::,.:::::: rn 3 ~ & FRAME 1B" ;:;o.12'N,•;;;;;'':,"~` TREE INVENTORY NOTES o a ~ SHEDS /,ONE STORY ~~•D.D9'w~• ° o .MASONRY BUILDWC ~ ~ ~ ~ LFE = 28,6 O / / / / / / / r.:•.i•:CONCREff •.'i:'rt'i:•:•. • ORIGINAL RECEIVED I \ ~No 705-7 7 i /j ~ ,-TREE CAPdbF`i,'f~~ii)T 1t)f~lE N I ~ ® TREE D(3H 4 3 ZQQ I c ` ' PLANNING UEPART ENT LOT 5 1~ ~.-TREE 5vrwlr~ol. .CITY OECIEARWp ER a~ L l \ I- L 1 \ ~ l ~ J U ~ ~ 3 U c L '"~=TREE II'JVEI'~ITUR`i RA CII~,IG U~ J lV = TREE IPIVEI~ITORY' I~IUNI~ER U L I 0 i _J N N li lD I I' I N 0 u~ I~ 'I -r~ U i C) L LL av s 0 Q U 0 i I1``I SCALE: 1 "=20' TSI I i _ • • r' , ` - , . . ~ - , f ~ r 4 y'•~ ~ r.-, . ~ s~crio~ row r IT11,:. RANGE 15 LAST , • J 1 , ' , . ~ ~ , , . , • , t • ;M 9 X , , 'v • , . . X , • , • yT , 1 ;vcl'%~ ` f 2x ; • 2 • PROJEL"T BENCHMNt 8 • ~~~r • OZ v ; NA11. fd STEEY rAB , 90 < : , ,ELEr 223J'fEEi kAWBB - • 13~3a a~n „ . 9 : Rio • 1dN1J1~0 ° ONE STORY;MASONRY BUILDING • LFE ;'24:3% ~ ; tix ~ b 2 a NOTES: _ x , y X ROUGH car,,, 6 NAft'& STEf7. JAB: ASP"HALT P A V E M E T "r 9, nF N ~ 2 2 E[Ey 12.9r'fEET NAVD88 , • . -THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE. BENEFIT OF A ' Q .COMPLETE AND UP-TO-DATE TITLE REPORT, EASEMENTS- ~ ~ fENCE CORNER ~ y° AND OTHER ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST OTHER THAN AS U W 0,4~5•df - ~ FlP a%4* 2tix LOT 8 PRM (~J SHOWN HEREON. o Q m 1 ti ~ • ~ A S ~r N 33 ~1 FCM 4'x4; ~ , w ~ ri'• ` ~ PHACT PAVEMENT ° d.5'CCNC.:CURB 2 _ C9f '.mr~ ~ :.....CONC~....,.'r •43 25 P f I -THIS PARCEL APPEARS TO LIE IN FLOOD ZONES "A" AND yr Z X PER FLOOD lNSUR,4NCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY No. o.rol;,aorF ;;•1y.~'::'0.• ._......•.k: : f= ~x2 125096, PANEL No. 0108 H MAP No. 12103C01O8N ~.L10N ~ v 2 MAP REVISED MAY 17, 2005, NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE Q •••1 : x..,.. .:.:~C: • Q1 ~ , }9.6 3.3 19.9 ~J PROGRAM, FEDERAL .EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, ~ 61 ~ T _ _ BONE S ORY ~ I 2~ ~ 2 Ati MASONRY & ,FRAME BUILDING y ~ ° f -BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY • //////////No. 622//////// I ::.'rr:~'h•.::.,•.;r.r{°:•:i•i::.:°.ic.°:::..,•. • x FENCE END N 0 ~r Z . LINE OF LEMBO CIRCLE BEINGS 00' 15'59"W ASSUMED . 4sE ` ( ) •.:::•:•::••~::::~N~•.4~ ...........:::~::::•:::2•::~:: ~ ^ LFE = 23.4 (FLOOR LEVELS VARY) ..TlC...~!c......... v I O -ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE 1N NORTH AMERICAN ~ ' I ~ VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88}. ~ ~ w ATM I a o p 0 ~ O -ELEI/ATl ry: ONS ARE R FER CED F I. E EN TO LORIDA DEPART OF MENT ~ o k~ 8 CON::: 4 4, CRE1E•~' i~:°rcirari:::.e:.°::::. 1 0.7' P ai 1 r y' rrr;;;:9'`.?L.':°`4:~:cc'iasi4?:::':~:(~'~•'••ii~ii:`::?-:•::::::•:::•:: •.iiriicirtir:r:•iif;::r., 0 O q TRANSPORTATION BENCHMARK No• 108, A BRASS DISK 1N o ~ ~ ~ •D' r9.9' ~ ~ Q W Z e N CONC. CURB . "Y.r...~;::::::.~::::::.:e::•°: 3~ 2 ...~'.::::::::::.~rr.~r._.}::•:•: 2•^::;?{r:`;`;r.':` }(rr'r}t`ii?riiiirr::ii~::i:'i:?• Ay A CONCRETE PLANTER. ELEVATION = 24.25 FEEL' (NAVD88). • ~ O z ~ m 23, ~ 2A> o ~ x o.5' coNa LYIRe x :~~,;~:~:~:~:~:~:~.~a~:~:c~:::;:•.:•• z se x o a2 ap r3r ~ ~ J m 2 ~ ~ Q ~ •`0 ~ a LOT 7 L~ .J ~ Z ~ ~ a e I ~ Q•N ~ ~ ~ ~ V V ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ g2 / ~ 4 I~ ~ FlR.5 8' 8 H~ , ~.,•l~ ~ FWI7FDCOTl1NE 011'W ~ to ~ Q 'J ~ ~ Q7 2 DESCRIPTION (AS FURNISHED): ~ r2D.D' (PkM) , , ~ i ° anti W ~ ~ o LOTS 6 AND 7, MAP OR PLAT ENTITLED LEMBG SUBDIV1S10N , z ~ ~ O i ~ 0. ASPHALT CORNER 0.3'E , ? ~ AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 48, PAGE 38 OF THE PUBLIC ~A a• I ~ ~ W •'a 2 v 3 ~ o. RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Z ~ I o ~ ~ ~ A b , W• v AX Ax i0 d a 2 2 ~ 9 ~ t, ° ~ S 23' ~ ~ 3 11 ~c ~ o x asPwu.r a r'E AA 99 a ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ h 2 2 z 4'~ a' COT 6 ~ ~ U O n e O~ H ~ ~ n Q LINE TABLE a 2 0 0 L 1 S 89' 13'49 "E P&M 120.00' x, W W v~ i ( ) ~ . ~ ~ • L2 N 89' 13 49 'W (P&M) 120.00 W AsPFwcr oa'E , ~ u , Z4 A L3 N 00' 15 59 E (P&M) 140.00 ~ ~ y. 2 e 2 36' x X~ ~ • CT B CH NNL d; STEEL rAB FENCE I MARK 1 MARK I ELEV = 25.42 FEET NAVD88 ( FENCE CORNER 5.3'N,4.8'E q' CHNN rJNK CE CORNER 11.5' NA2 & STEEL iA8 I 4.5 N ~ AB U7 NAVDB8 1' ~ ~ ~ ~S~ NW WALL CORNER y,A b 1~ k~ bb ELEV = 2J 91 FEET NAVDBB yX a1 < FL7N 4'x4" ry O.I 5,5.0'E 2 ~ CDNC CORNER 0.7'N ~ 2 23.43 2~ , 2 tig. ~x = p~ q x U•pr.:~ir:~:~'';::ii:~'~P------ ~ a ~ ,METAL x L2 xis 2 ::.>~?..N ~ v, ' k fR,4ME /ONE STORY ts' ; ~:;ar2M~;::;:'t;~,~:; e 2 SHEDS :~•:o.o9'W;:;::;::.,:•:::.,,:: MAS'ONRY• ~UlLD1NG TREE LEGEND I ~ ! ~~F = 28.6' =PALM ~No. T05-707 ~ I /i/// x t 2 • =EAR 6A ~ g6 a 'r0 x x1 I 55 2 _ _ 2y ~ ~ 2 k x~ 2~ 2 1 bx -LOT 5 2 ax 2 x° o ~ 21 2a~ REVISIONS xb 63 ~ y X 9 2 k X A 2~ ~ y x 1x 1x _ ~ `a~ , 21x ~ 2 2 ~ 2 MICHAEL E ASS CIi4TES BAK R D M, LAND SURVEYORS and PLANNER ~q~+~iJlr~~~\ 220..SOUTH SAPPORO AVEN`j' ,';a ' ~ ' ` TARPON SPRINGS, FIORID~~ ' • 'k ~ i 727 938-5026 - FAX' 71y 5' $ ~ ~ ~ ,.3~ z fFlr AU7HORITA1rON NUMBER"4p „1~ 4 '9 1 HEREBY;CERTI,F.Y'' 7 THE ATl H SKETCH OF SURVEY LEGEND AND, ABBREVIATIONS: oArt • MAY r7, :2006 scALr:.' ~ ~ = 2D' ; 7S IRUE A~'D C I?<: EETS THE MINIMUM ' ~ =CENTERLINE, FIR ,FOUND IRON ROD, =POWER POLE; ~ ~ =LIGHT POLE,: f~ _ .WATER; METER,. TECHNICAL 5TA7~1dARDS.S Bk", THE fLOR1DA STATE ; RLE: LEMB06T C S _ CONCRETE SLAB M -MEASURED P . - PER PLOT ~ -GUY ANCHOR ' TM.= TELEPHONE MARKER, ` .SURVEYED BY .RUK BGVIRD OF.S~~` PERS~AND CHAPTER CP - PERMANENT` CO L POINT, A C = AR CONDITIONER; - - , BT - BUILDING TAE CLF - CHAIN; UNK FENCE 6 FId~?/ ~ R = R1GM OF-.WAY, N =NORTH =SOUTH E = EAST W =WEST ° OHW = OVERHEAD; W! E F]P FOUND" IRON PIPE R, • . ' F.B. 666 PAGE` f5,16 DRAWN BY.• RAC ~ ' ' G ` ONC: =-CONCRETE, SIR =SET 1J2".IRON ROD Nd: 4086, ( ) , BR =-BEARING REFERENCE, FCM = FUUNQ.: CONCRETE MONUMENT - ~ ~ , . •,a~,, W C =WITNESS CORNER, PRM'= PERMANENT REFERENCE- MONUMENT LFE- _ .LOWEST FLOOR ELEI/ TlON' - u c G ~ ~ A • Nor Auo WITHOUT THE srcNATURE AND. ORtcINAL•RAlSED X0 00 EXISTING; ELEVATION; L8 = UCENSED,BUSINESS, Cf`= UNE'NUMBER. SEE L/NE`TABLE, =COVERED, AREA • SEAL OF A FtORlDA IICENSfD SURVEYOR AND MAPPER:;: „ , ; ' p~' ~ ~ ~ ,P , „ ~ , , , LEGAL DESCRIPAc? LOTS 41, 4? 43, & 44, BLOCK C, HicHLAND cRDVF ACCORDING >0 MAP oR CER11FlCATE OF APPROVAL OF COUNTY. CLERk E D FO D F .1 0 PLAT THEREOF AS .RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6; PAGE 75, OF THE PUBLIC COUNTY OF PINELLAS RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CHAPTER 177. PART 1. FLORIDA ST,4 TIITF.S' STAY OF FLORIDA UNDER CONTRACT-10 IHE.C/TY Of:CLEARWATER, 1 HEREBY CERAfY THAT PURSUANT`T0 l KEN BURK GRAPIER 177.08(1), FLOR/DA.STATUTES, l HAVF REVIEWED AI/S PLAT AND FIND 1HAT 1T t; CLERK OF 1HE C/RCU/T COURT OF PINELLAS COUNTY, CONFORMS TO CHAPTER 177,- PART 1, OF`TI•!E FLORIDA STATUTES THE GEOMETRIC DATA ROR/OA;- HEREBY CERAFY 1FlAT THIS PLAT HAS BEEN EXAMINED AND .THAT !T COMPLIES HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED FOR MAIHfMAACAL CLOSURE. IN FORM WI]H ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATUTES OF IRE STALE OF ROR/DA PERTAINING TO MAPS AND PLATS AND THAT THIS PLAT HAS BE . EN. FILED FOR RECORD /N . PLAT BOOK______, PAGE? ? PURL/C RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, ' . DEDICA AON• FLORIDA, THIS DAY OF ?_ .YEAR OF 20. AT KATHLEEN C. LANZNfR DATE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER . 7HE? UNDERSIGNED CEI?AF/ES THAT THEY ARE AIE OWNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND KEN BURKE, CLERK BY YICENSf NUMBER 'LS 5120 - STALE OF FCOIi/DA :DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND THAT BESIDES THE/R /N]L7lEST AlERE/N ]HERE ARE NO ?., .PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ? DEPUTY CLERK . ... CUMBEY & FAIR, INC. LB# 2168 OUTSTANDING /NIFRES'15 IN SAID PROPERTY OTHER THAN (HOSE SHOWN OR NOTED ON 7FlIS PLAT, WH1CH lS HEREBY PLAI7E0 AS "CLEVELAND STREET TOWNHOMES; AND THAT THEY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC /N GENERAL, ALL EASEMENTS' CREATED BY THIS PLAT.. OWNER.• PIERRE L. COURNOYFR . 1476 CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER, fZ 33755 727-410-369.2 PIERRE L. COURNOYE!' PRESIDENT Wl7NESS.• Wl AJESS.• SU V£ DR'S OTES' ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AS TO MORTGAGEE.• R Y N STALE OF L BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE. EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE Of ATE NW 1 4 OF THE NW 1 4 OF PRINT W17NESS NAME PR/NT WITNESS NAME ;, / / COUNTY Of SECAON 14.-29-15.` SA/O B£AR1NG BEING N007?136 W(PCED). ' THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY 2. TN/S P1Ar AS RECORDED /N /T5 GRAPHIC FORM, IS THE OfF'ICIAL DEPICTION OF:INE SUBDlV1DE0 OF _ : 20_.., BY WHO LANDS DESCR/BED HEREIN AND WILL /N N0: CIRCUMSTANCES BE SUPPLANTED /N AUTHORITY BY ANY 1S PtRSONALLY KNOWN TO ME OR HAS PRODUCED aS OTHER GRAPHIC OR D/GJTAL FORM OF THE PLAT. THERE MAY BEADDIAONAL.RES]R/CnONS. THAT IDENAfICAAON AND WHO D/D/b/D NOT TAKE AN OA11•l. ARE NOT RECORDED ON THIS PLAT THAT MAYBE FOUND /N THEPUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. ° ' • 3. ALL PUBLIC U)IUTY EASEMENTS MUST PROVIDE' THAT SUCN:EASEMENIS SHALL ALSO BE. EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSIRUbA?N, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND OPERAAON.OF CABLE : - ?'KNON2EDGEMEN7? . NOTARY S/GNA]URE. TELEVISION SERNCfS; PROVIDED, "HOWEVER, NO SUCH CONSTRUCAON, INSTALLAAON, .MAIN1ElUANCL; STATE; OF FLORIDA AND OPERAAON;OF?CABLE:7ELEVIS/ON SERVICES SHALL INTERFERE W/1N 7HEFAC/U77ES AND. SERVICES OF AN ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE,: GAS, OR OTHER PUBLIC UAL/lY. IN 1NF EVENT.A CABLE COUNTY OF PINELLAS) . TEL I?S/ON COMPANY DAMAGES 7NE FAC/U11ES OF A PUBLIC UTILITY, lT SHALL: BE. SOCELY.RE- SPONS/BLEFOR THE DAMAGES.7H/SSECIION`SHALC NOrAPPLYTTJ 1HOSEPR/VATFEASEMENTS ?' THIS /S 70 CERTIFY THAT ON THIS _ DAY OF ,? 20_, PERSONALLY . GRANTED TO OR OBTAINED BY A'PARACULAR ELECTRIC, :TELEPHONE, GAS OR OAfER PUBLIC IIAUTY.: APPEARED BEFORE ME, ??? MEMBER/AUIHOR/ZEO AGENT AND ,.,. MEMBER/AU7NOR/Z£0 AGENT, ? WHO /S PERSONALLY 4. TRACT : "A" lS A COMMON AREA. AND /S DED/CAIED AS A PRIVATE ACCESS,: DRAINAGE UTILITY , KNOWN 10 ME OR ? PRODUCED AS /DENA/7CAAON .. AND LANDSCAPE EASEMENT. TRACT "A" = 9,318: SQUARE FEET OR 0.214 ACRE f . AND D/D/b/D NOT TAKE. AN OATH, KNOWN TO BE THE PERSONS DESCRIBED IN . . AND WNO EXECUTED A4E FOREGO/NC /NSIRUMENT OF DED/CAAON AND ACKNOWLEDGED .THE EXECUAON JHERFOF TO BE THEIR fREE ACT. AND DEED, FOR THE USES AND 5 ALt ROAD$ STREETS AND. UALIAES, 1NCLUD/NG 5TORMWAIER FACILIAES'DESIGNAlEO V AGENCY REVIEW AS PR/ ATE PURPOSES HEREIN EXPRESSED. , HEREON, ARE SPECIACALLY-SET ASIDE FOR THE USf BY AIE PROPERTY OWNERS AND IN NO WAY' REVIEWED BY THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY OF THE ChY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY,' CONSAJUIE A DED/CAAON IO INE GENERAL PUBLIC OR 10 THE C/lY, tT BE/NC SPEClFICALIY WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL ON 7NE ABOVE DATE FLORIDA, TN/S DAY OF , 20 UNDERSTOOD 11/AT NO OBUCA7)ON IS IMPOSED UPON THE Cf1Y, FOR MAINTENANCE OR IMPROVEMENT OF.SUCH. SJREETS'AND. UAUAES MAINTENANCE OF THE PRIVATE UITLIAES 'WATER . , SERVICES BEYOND ME1FR, SANITARY SY51EM, STORM WRIER SYSTEM AND ROADWAYS WILCBE MY COMMISSION EXP/RES• ____ MAINTAINED 8Y THE HOME OWNER ASSOClAlION.. . SECRETARY - . Notary Pub/lc PRINTED OR 7YPE0 6. TOTAL :AREA = 13,000 SQUARE FEET OR 0.298 ACRE f.' . wig {iVU/YL/L vr.: me ?r/r yr GLCHIS'IYA/tK, Y/rvtLLAJ GUU/Vlr, YLUIf/UA, IRIS DAY OF , 20.: SURVEYORS CERl7FlCA7E 1, DENNIS J. EYRE, MAKER OF THIS PLAT, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IT lS A CERTIFICATE OF MORTGAGEE . WILL/AM B, HORNE Il . CORRECT REPRESENTAAON.OF 171E LANDS SURVEYED, THAT .1N/S.PLA:T WAS MADE' 1NE (INDERS/GNEO, AS MORTGAGEE UNDER A CERTAIN MORTGAGE DAlEO C/TY MANAGER, UNDER MY RESPONS/BLF D/RECAON AND SUPERVISION, AND THAT THE SURVEY DATA . . RECORDED /N O.R. BOOK .PACE COMPLIES W1TH 1HF REQUIREMENTS OF CHARIER 177 PART 1 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES / . PUBLIC RECORDS OF f'1NELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, JOINS IN AND-CONSENTS TO FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT MfE1?' ALL MATERIAL, </N COMPOSIAON,. REQU/RED BY AND AGREES THAT IN.THE FLORIDA STATUIf 177.091; AND TT•JAT ON THE?DAY OF , 20., AfE DED/CAAON OF AIE LANDS DESCRIBED HEREON, PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS. HAVE BEENPLACED, .A5 SHOWN. HEREON, AS EVENT OF FORECLOSUITE OF 7H/S MORTGAGE ALL DED1CAlE0 AREAS SHALL REQU/RED BY LAW. SURVIVE AND BE.ENFURCEABIE SIGNED THIS DAY , 20_.. BANK • _ _ _ :. CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF CITY MANAGER• BY.• APPROVED FOR THE CITY Of C1EA WA R • R lE PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA THIS DAY OF. WITNESS' - ; 20?; PROVIDED THAT THE PLAT /S f/LED IN THE OFFICE OF THE DENN/S J. EYRE NAME' CLERK OF JNE C/RCU/T COURT OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, W11H/N ONE MONIF/ FROM FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR ND. 2865 PRINT W17NESS NAME AIE DATE OF HIS/HER APPROVAL. GEODATA SERVTCES, INL ARE 1822 DREW ST.. SU/1P 8 WITNESS.• CLEARWAIE'R, FL 33765 . • Phone 727-447-1763 - ? E ? °? . CITY MANAGER . O 2 ?p?? PR/NT WITNESS NAME _ SHEET 1 OF 3 BEIN A REPEAT L G OF OTS 41 THROUGH 44, BLOCK C, HIGHLAND GROVE AS RECORDED IN -PLAT BOOK 6 PAGE 75 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLA ` C S OUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING IN SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUT RA H, NGE 15 EAST, IY C T OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA NE: CORNER `OF THE NW 7 4 OF THE NW 1 4 OF SECTION 14-29-15 a w w HIGHLAND GROPE PB 6, PG 75 ?h ,, GRAPHIC SCALE LOT 8 LOT 7 LOT 6 LOT 5 ? I ,? ' rn 20 0 . ? 0 20 , H ' `? ? N S89 52 01 E 100.00 `` W ? ' ' 28.48,. .21.76' 21.73' 28.03' . ? ? tN FEET ) "? _ ` TRACT „A„ t M p ? _ i . _ . ? O p inch - 20 ft. ' .. .•. .... 8 66.. •.... ? 1V C) 6.2 • • 6.1 W Z ri ?• ?? ?:£::: O :: a Q •..:r:.:::.::•:::r..::::r.:.^:: Q Q t c ..........UNIT 1"::;: ?:•: •••:: ?•.: ?• UNIT UN •r:: ?: ?:: • o Z ?. O I- . o I- J O LEGS/?/D U 'U O cv _( ? O O Q :' d• i ?:r• ii'?::' O m O = .... CE - - NTERLINE OF R/GHT OF WA ?- ? ?. Y ;:ii,:, ,:;{::;`'';,':•'„':..:`',.'erg?::?r ??a:}?:iei?"rr?:r;''?` .... ?- W = FN&0 FOUND N /L ::.:?'?;:;•:::.????.?`.:??:??:;?::?:::. ? :.........:.:::.::...:?•::?::..;;..::??.?:'::?::.??:::::::?:;;,?:.: ? A .AND DISK •:?:. : ?.: ? Z ? ?. - C E- C OMMON EL EMENT :.• :'f . ,.. ::`;?';?:::::..:`:::;?':?;:.`;?:::??::.'';..::;•:::?';'?;?'?:;??:?::°:;?::'::':;:':.:??:::::?';?::`::?;:..:::.`. E UNITED C LC = HIGHLAND GROI/E' '"""'`''""°`'' , ., HIGHLAND GROI/E ? OMMON ELEMENT ,? ? 0 _ 'PB 6 PG 75 PB 6 PG 7 5 0 R - OF 6.7 FlCIAL 5.6 . RECORD B00 K Q `??` '1 W - 0 o b ` p. PG .- .PAGE LO]' 40 0 0 0 ; LOT '45 W PCP =PERMANENT CONTROL POINT o ? o ?j r7 ?, r, PRM _ PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT ;A'°""? j ,??<°' ? ,•••wM? 1- ??? I ?•_•~~? ?- PCED = PINELLAS'COUNTYENGINEERING. DEPARTMENT '"""'"'' ;` :; ?? ,?`'`r ? J (P) .= PLAT ? Z PB -PLAT BOOK • 3 TRACT A ?. PLS =PROFESSIONAL LAND SURI/EYOR 0o COMMON AREA- O p R _ RADIAL o • ? O ? ? PRIVATE ACCESS, DRAINAGE, . Q O ? R/W = R/GHT-OF-WA Y O ?. ;UTILITY & LANDSCAPE EASEMENT _ ? p ? _ • ? ? ? o O , (D? DEED O ? u? w w: O ?. _ n ° O Z O C S-CONCRETE SLAB o LOT 1 -= LOT 2 - LOT 3 = ? .LOT 4 .. / Z 3581 SF 4 2829 SF ©2825 SF o: 3764 SF N Q ?0 0 = /A OIiERALL 0 0 0 v o ? o POB = 'POINT OF BEGINNING ° ? (? POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT b ° z ? Z ` ? BLOG. =BUILDING t € L N =NORTH { E =EAST . W _ WEST S = S0 ? _ ? 130.00 P UTH 26.62 1.76 21.73 29.89 , ? „? N89'52 01 W ?= SECTION CORNER :.i ,f' , f 11 f N89 52 01 W 100.00 eo' R/w _ CLEVELAND STREET _ _? _ ¦ =SET P.RM. PL5#2865 . 4'X4" CONCRETE MONUMENT . '. ?'= SET 5 8"CAPPED IRON ROD / PLS#2865.. NOTE.• BUILDING DETAILS ON SHEET 3 OF 3. ?'?B Q 2 LODE H ET F 3 SE 20 SECrI~N ~5 TOWNSHIP '29 SOUTH RANI )UTH, RANGE 7 5 EAST ~ ~ I s xA ~ 2Q 2x' 2 q2 ~ ,x 2 1 xZ ' QZ NA1L 8• STEEL .TAB ElEV ~ 22.J3 FEET NAVD88 a ~ r i CL ~ ONE STORY MASONRY BUILDING xb~ LFE = 24.3/ ~ ~ Zti kb 2Z ~x X ROUG NoTES~ N g N , . 2 ~ 96 n~ NAILc~STEELTAB ASPHALT PAVEMENT r ~ 2 2 ELEY = 22.91 FEEL NAVDBB --THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A ~ , - COMPLETE AND UP-TO-DATE TITLE REPORT. EASEMENTS % 1 ~s AND OTHER ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST OTHER THAN AS v W o.4'~5.4~' LOT 8 F1P 3j4• 2~ 0 z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N PRM (P} SHOWN HEREON. ° ~ ~1 . , 1 FCM 4x4•- , ASPHALT PAVfMF T rO ti ~ 0.5 CONt~CURB '~2' ~l, ~ N ~i ~ a- -THIS PARCEL APPEARS TO LIE IN FLOOD ZONES "A" AND ~ Z f1R s/~' • , .:;::::coNC.•:;;•:;:•: ~¢3 25 PZ-_~- I g1 X PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY No. o.ro'so.or'E I ~i 1 I ::•:•:...$...•ti a BTO.BS 0 A car I X 125096, PANEL No. 0108 H, MAP No. 12103CD 1 DBH, ~ ~r~;;, m e a MAP REVISED MAY 17, 2005, NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE ~ • • ' I ~ ;gs~ ~ ' • ° 33 Q2x ~ • • j9.9' m PROGRAM, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. e 1 Nf ONE STORY s I ~ g ~ ~ MASONRY & ,FRAME ~BUILDJNG ~ I -BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY 2 FENCE END ~ % Qy 31 r"': x //////////No. 622 z ` UNE OF LEMBO CIRCLE, BEINGS 00°15'59"W (ASSUMED). ~ ~ ~ ^ LFE = 23.4 (FLOOR LEVELS VARY) ~ i•ii: .:crii:::::•~`•~!'~.C(1~..1~1CK?:•:::i:h'r2g'•:v: v ~ b ~ .a ~ g . , ~ I -ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN NORTH AMERICAN ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). o ~ ~ ~ 4 • ! ~ ~ o W ~4,)M ~ ~ .4' o O ! o J 0 1 d - ^ I -ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF o - o k c'4, ''r:{':i•rrCONCREIE``:r:(,'r:,} :,~:iii:•:i:•i:.e: r:. 1 0 t); ~ •;1i:~'~9::•i:•:ri:iiiii'r::~i::°::,iir:iiiFb~•:~i:i•:;ii:~•i"vir:i:}i::r:•ir'bq:•::•iii;:~'r:•i:a:::ii:•iir:•i g• h Q~' 'sue 1A I TRANSPORTATION BENCHMARK No. 108, A BRASS DISK IN o ~ .o' • Ca Q CONC. CURB "'F. ~ . .......:L:iiri:ii:.,~t..............::i r:•'ri:i..,......., . A CONCRETE PLANTER. ELEI/AT10N = 24.25 FEET NAVDBB). W 2 O ~ ...............................2.::.:::::::::::::........•• 2.;:•;.~:.:`:•':::::::';:.:':::::':::::•::::;::.;•::~::~:;•::' gp5 ( / • ~ Q y 2 .n 0.5 CONC. CURB Z 22,b8 ` Zb J dC x X :'r:ii:~:`::~}:c:,riv~i:•'::"•'i,cirr•. Q~ m Z 2 a:~:}r:::,:iirji:•i:?;i::;:':i•;;:• 131' ~ ~ m• ~ ~ k ~ ,`D z LOT 7 >,93 ~ ~ ~ ~ e I ~ v ~ \ v ru ~ v ~ Z / ~ 4 ~4. II ~ '~s ~ f1R 5j8' ~ oH'~ ~ ~ ~ PLATTED , 2 ® 0.485 % ~ ~ ~ J h LOT UNE 011'W ~ Z ''y 120.0' (P&M} . ~ _ i ~ ~ ~ DESCRIPTION (AS FURNISHED): O 20• ~ ~ _ _ - _ _ ~ _ a1 I~ ~ ~k' O O - =LOTS-SAND 7; MAP OR PLAT ElVT1TLED"`L~MbU SUBDNISIDN' ~ 0 ~ kSPHALT CORNER 0.3'f ~ AS~ RECORDED 1N PLAT- BOOK 48, PAGE 38 OF THE PUBLIC r<~ I o ~ m z RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ k b I W• 0. 2 2 ~ 3~ J e o g 2g, Z caws `5 x S1 ,p A!~PNN.T 0.1 f 2 : Ak ~ Ayr ~ y ~ 2 ~ z 4' CLF m , ~ LoT s 4 ~ ~ o~ ~ i a U °O UNE TAELE ^ o tia z ~ L 1 S 89' 13'49 "E (P&M) 120.00' x W W cn I > ~ L2 N 89 13 49 "W (P&M) 120.00 W nsPwur o.2'E . ~ L3 N 00' 15'59 "E P&M 140.00' ' Q~ " z ( ~ x ~ ss• ~y x~ • h 2 NAIL & srEEt rAe I 7 BENCHMARK f CHMARX 1 f fLEV = 25.42 FEE( NAVD88 FENCE CORNER 5.31~4,8'E 4' CHNN UNK CE ~4 ~ 1J5 ~ NAIL do STEE1 TA8 I ECEY = 23.91 FEET NQVD88 19 ~ ~ NW. IIAtI. CORNER yb b 1~ k1 f~ TAB I FEET M4VDB8 X ~ fCM 4x4' ti 0.1 ~ 5.O E 2 CWVC, CORNER 0.7'N 2g' Z 3,43 yx < 2 ~ A L2 X2K•5 X tnu D:i i°r:i•:?•:~:•i::i•i:25'lP} - a ~ ,ME~pTA~L x b2 ;•X_ Ur:•:~::;:•:::•:•::•::: I n ~ ~ y ~ 1 ME ~ 2 18' ai:•i:0.12 N, r i:•::i:it i?.ir; Z ~ /ONE STORY ~ Z ~ p z ~ HED~ MASONRY•BUELDIN ::.::to.G9zv; T Z ~ _ ~ CEO LEND ~ 11 FE = 28.6 ~ Tiiii/i In O M ~ x iii'r:•EiCONCRfT~' :•ii;;.;{;: n w =PALM AND. 705-~07 ~ m ~ C~ m Z ~ 2b x ~ D p ~ =EAR b~ 1~ 0y 6a 3b I ~ ~ r» x x ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m 1 b• :a Z x Z 1 bx LOT 5 g° 2 ax 0 X Q 1 ,~1 ~A5 REVISIONS xb b3 1 xy 26 2bx y x9 xZ x" 0b 3a 1 7 1 J: 21x 2 • J C MICHAEL BAKER A5 ~ !AYES LAND SURVEYORS and PLANNERS i 220-SOUTH SAFFORD AVENUE y.. ~ TARPON SPRINGS, fL0E21DA 34689 ~,5 + ~ . • (727) 9.78-5028 - FAX (727) 938-2586 AUINORIl41lON NUMBER. LB 4019 l NfREBY CERTIFY TNA7 THE ATTACHED SKETCH OF SURVEI' LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS: DATE.' MAY 17, 2006 SCALE: 1 = 20 ~ !S lF?UE AND CORRECT AND THAT IT MEETS THE MINIMUM ~ =CENTERLINE, FIR =FOUND IRON ROD, q~ =POWER POLE, , ~ =LIGHT POLE, ®=WATER METER, 1ECNNlCA! S7•ANDARDS SEI• FORTH BY 1HE FLORlUA STAT2: C S =CONCRETE S1A8, M =MEASURED, {P =PER PLAT, ~ = GUY ANCHOR, TM =TELEPHONE MARKER, E7LE' LEMBO67 S~~p gy,. BOARD OF SUh'YEYbRS d PERS AND .CNAPTETi CP =PERMANENT CO L POINT, A C = A R CONDITIONER, BT = BUILDING TIE, CLF =CHAIN LINK FENCE, BiGl7 FLOR AD 1 TINE CODE. R = RIGMT OF WAY, N =NORTH • = SOUTH, E = EAST, W =WEST; ONW = OVERHE4D WIRE, FlP =FOUND IRON PIPE, F.B. 666 PAGE 15,.16 DRgWN BY.• RAC ONC. CONCRETE, S!R SET if2 IRON ROD ND. 4086, {BR) BEARING REFERENCE, FCM =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT; ~ _ _ _ , dL" W/C =WETNESS CORNER, PRM =PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT; LFE =LOWEST FLOOR ELEVAlTON, NOT VALID WITHOUT iHF SIGNARIRF AND ORIGINAL RAISED X0.00 =EXISTING ELEVATION, L9 = LfCENSED BUSINESS, L 1 = LINE NUMBER SEE LINE TABLE, =COVERED AREA SEAL DF A FI.ORftTA LlCEN5F0 SURVFY[)R AND MAPPER, 1~fTE'SICAED -