The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2006-04019 LL ? _° Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 X SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION X SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets X SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFP FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC. MAILING ADDRESS: 503 CLEVELAND STREET CLEARWATER FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727/639-7587 FAX NUMBER: 727/445-7277 PROPERTY OWNER(S): CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERVICE ORGANIZATION, INC. List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: JAMES BOND MAILING ADDRESS: 319 SOUTH GARDEN AVENUE CLEARWATER 33756 PHONE NUMBER: 727/467-5000 FAX NUMBER: 727/445-7277 CELL NUMBER: 727/638-9088 E-MAIL ADDRESS: flblldesigners(a)scientology.net B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) F PROJECT NAME: OAK COVE PROJECT VALUATION: $ 20M STREET ADDRESS 210 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE PARCEL NUMBER(S): 16/29/15/62131/000/0010 AND 0020 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 1.79 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ENCLOSED DEED WITH THIS APPLICATION PROPOSED USE(S): 252 HOTEL ROOMS FOR CHURCH PARISHONERS DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: REQUEST SITE PLAN APPROVAL, INCLUDING A TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED NUMBER Specifically identify the request OF PARKING SPACES FROM 189 (0.75 PER UNIT) TO 52 (0.2 PER UNIT). (include number of units or square ALSO REQUESTING INTERIM USE OF FLOORS 1-8 FOR FSO footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations: e.g. RELIGIOUS SERVICES SO THE FH HOTEL CAN ALSO BE RENOVATED. reduction in required number of CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: 11 V I 0 Page 1 of 7 a a DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES - X _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) X SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. X 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. SEE ATTACHMENT D. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. SEE ATTACHMENT D. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. SEE ATTACHMENT D. ORIGINAL E D REC v 4. U The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. t' SEE ATTACHMENT D. PLANNING DEPARTMENT s r CITY O F , . ?. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. SEE ATTACHMENT D. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. SEE ATTACHMENT D. Page 2 of 7 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) X Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: SEE ATTACHMENT D E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) X A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. El If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; NO V Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; NOV 0 9 2006 X Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; PLANNING DEPARTIAE"O' X All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; X Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; CITY OF CLEARWAY X A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. X Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; X Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. X COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable X AC NOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) X SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; X TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; X TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. X LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; X PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; X GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; Page 3 of 7 • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) X SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36°): ORIGINAL X Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; RECEIVED X X North arrow; NO 0 9 2006 Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; X All dimensions; PLANNING DEPARTMENT X Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; CITY OF CLEARWATER X Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; X All existing and proposed points of access; X All required sight triangles; X Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; X Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; X Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; X All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; X Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; X Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; X Location of all landscape material; X Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; X Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and X Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. a SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED X Land area in square feet and acres; 78,050 s.f. 1.79 ac N/A 78,050 s.f. 1.79 X Number of EXISTING dwelling units; 253+ X Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 170 261 X Gross floor area devoted to each use; 173,231 s.f. 312,200 max 184,372 s.f. X Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the 68 Per Section 2- 52 number of required spaces; 902 X Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, 27,932 s.f. N/A 26,949 s.f. expressed in square feet; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility N/A N/A easement; X Building and structure heights; 115 feet NIA 115 feet X Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and 0.54 NIA 0.53 X Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. 2.22 4.0 max 2.36 X REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/s X 11); 17 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: X One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; X Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; X All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; X Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); X Streets and drives (dimensioned); X Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); X Structural overhangs; Page 4 of 7 a a H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) X LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): X All existing and proposed structures; X Names of abutting streets; X Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; X Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; X Sight visibility triangles; X Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; X Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); X Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; X Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; X Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; X Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; X Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); X Irrigation notes. X REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/Z X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) X BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; X All sides of all buildings; X Dimensioned; X Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); X Materials; X REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. ORIGINAL RECFIUED 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) X All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. X All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11 color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. Page 5 of 7 r ORIGINAL RECEIVED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) 13 X Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ¦ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. I`0V 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN CITY OF CLEARWATER • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): / Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all V roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. X A nowledgement of fire flow calculationstwater study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow CalculationsWater Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the rty described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL S me and/or by t !,r r? j;SFr,2 who is personally known_ has pmdused as ir#eaEif+eatien. GLEN E. STILO ;Notary Public - State of Florkic Notary public, _ o`er Commission # DD24f My commission expire •'Ao?-?ro?p- Bonded By National Noto Sworn to r and Fiw3ilz subscribed before A.D me A.D. 20 this ?_ to day of "?av aye ??? VLCIY C. JIILV ??• ;-Notary Publk: -State of Florida Page 6 of 7 + •MyCprn*sion6#esOd10,2007 Commission # DD248749 •-;?°? ?oP,, Bonded By National NotaryAssn. ORIGINAL 40 do RECEIVED 4rr111 n n nnnn N. Z7 rt;utp AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: CITY OF CLEARWATER CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 210 S. OSCEOLA AVE. 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) REQUEST SITE PLAN APPROVAL, INCLUDING AN INCREASE IN DENSITY FROM 95 TO 146 HOTEL UNITS PER ACRE, AND A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FROM 196 (0.75 PER UNIT) TO 53 (0.2 PER UNIT). ALSO REQUESTING TEMPORARY USE OF FLOORS 1-8 FOR FSO RELIGIOUS SERVICES SO THE FH HOTEL CAN ALSO BE RENOVATED. 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: JAMES BOND ED ARMSTRONG as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. r perty Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this (?7, day of / yd (/!F "' da , Z (z ?j_( personally appeared Cf I-( (4(284-a who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. '10"Y ..„9 GLEN E. STILO Notary Public - State of Florida ' 1MVCon rrtsIonI5ptesOct10,2007 Commission # DD248749 Notary Public Signature Bonded By National NotaryAssn . Notary Seal/St My Commission Expires: Page 7 of 7 REVISED NOVEMBER 14, 2006 ATTACHMENT D FLEXIBLE APPLICATION CRITERIA OAK COVE BUILDING 210 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE The purpose of this request is to approve the Church of Scientology's Oak Cove Building as a hotel in downtown Clearwater. The Oak Cove building has received previous approval by the City of Clearwater on December 27, 2004 as a dormitory accessory to the Church's campus (City Case No. FLS 2004-11067). Due to the growth in the number of parishioners coming to the Church's facilities, there is a need for additional hotel rooms to accommodate these parishioners. The Oak Cove Building is perfectly located within a short walking distance to the new Flag Building, where services, classes and counseling will be held. In addition, the previous use of Oak Cove as a nursing/congregate care facility renders its floor plan easily renovated for use as a hotel. Accompanying this Flexible Application to approve the hotel use for the Oak Cove Building is a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application. The Oak Cove site would accommodate 170 hotel rooms in accordance with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Downtown Core District (95 hotel rooms per acre X 1.79 acres = 170 rooms). However, the building's floor plans can accommodate 252 hotel rooms, therefore, a TDR application to transfer hotel rooms from another Church-owned site is requested. The sending site for the TDR is the Church's Central Chiller Plant located at the northwest corner of Court Street and East Avenue. The Chiller Plant is an underutilization of the site; therefore, there is a substantial amount of development potential available to be transferred from this site. In addition to the ultimate use of the Oak Cove Building as a hotel, the applicant proposes an interim use of the building as a hotel and Church use for one-on-one counseling. The need for this interim use is due to the renovations planned for the Ft. Harrision Hotel immediately east of the Oak Cove. The applicant proposes to first renovate the Oak Cove, then move the hotel operations and counseling center from the Ft Harrison into the Oak Cove. The next step is for the Ft. Harrison Hotel to be renovated for use as a hotel only. Upon completion of the Flag Building, all church activities operating at the Oak Cove will be moved into the Flag Building and the Oak Cove Building can then function totally as a hotel. In summary, the applicant requests Flexible approval of the Church of Scientology Oak Cove Building as a hotel for its long -term use and a hotel with church counseling activities for an interim use. Both requests are pursuant to and consistent with the Downtown District in accordance with the Community Development Code. Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria The proposed time line for the interim use and long-term uses are shown below: Interim Use-Hotel and Church Counseling Oak Cove ready for occupancy May, 2007 Long-Term Use-Hotel Oak Cove converted to Hotel only June, 2008 The project's compliance with the General Applicability Criteria, the Flexible Criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan are described below. 1. RESPONSES TO THE GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA (Section 3- 913 of the Community Development Code) 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The property is located within the Downtown Core Character District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as are all surrounding properties. The Downtown Core District is the most intense and the most diverse district serving as the government center and principal employment area of the Downtown. The design of the Oak Cove Building is intentionally urban in scale and character. The intensity of the building is consistent with the Downtown Core District's desired development pattern. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The properties to the north of the site include a vacant parcel owned by Opus, City Hall, Peace Memorial Church's parking lot and the residential condominiums under construction by Opus. The properties to the south of the site are the County's parking garage and its administrative office facilities in several buildings. To the east of the site is the Church's Ft. Harrison Hotel. There is no development to the west of the site except the west-bound approach to Memorial Causeway Bridge, therefore, there will be no impacts on any properties to the west. This section of the Downtown Core subdistrict is redeveloping at a high density and intensity as planned so as to contribute to the activity level desired for Downtown. Page 2 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the i..-ghhorhood of the proposed use. The uses of the property as a hotel and counseling center pose no adverse affects on the health or safety of people residing or working in the area. A hotel is a common and desirable use in a downtown and will contribute to the activity level in downtown. The interim use of the property as both a hotel and counseling center also will not pose any adverse effects on the surrounding properties. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The site currently has two driveways on Osceola Avenue that provide access to the parking area. This application proposes to continue to use the Osceola driveways since the site has no other street frontage that can be used for access. (Please note that although the site's western boundary fronts on Pierce Boulevard, access via this street is limited as a result of the new Memorial Causeway Bridge approach.) The design of the parking area allows for two- way movement throughout the parking lot to ease the vehicular flow. The parking lot will be upgraded with new paving, striping and new landscaping. In addition, a new pedestrian walkway is proposed to be located beginning at the front entrance and connecting to the Osceola Avenue sidewalk to provide for safe pedestrian movement through the site by separating pedestrians from vehicles. The proposed development has been designed to minimize traffic congestion in several ways. First, the use characteristics of this Church-operated hotel generate a very low number of parking spaces and a very low number of trips in the p.m. peak hour as compared to a non-church operated hotel. In the parking analysis submitted as part of this application, the applicant has demonstrated that hotels operated by the Church of Scientology generate substantially less trips than other hotels. This is due to the fact that the parishioners typically arrive at local airports and use the Church-provided shuttle service from the airport, thus eliminating the need to rent a car for their visit. In fact as demonstrated in the parking analysis, a Church hotel requires only one space for every five hotel rooms based on a site-specific study of the four existing Church hotels in downtown Clearwater. The study also demonstrated that in the ultimate buildout use as a hotel, the building will generate only 6 inbound and 5 outbound trips in the p.m. peak hour. Due to the extremely small number of trips and related lack of impact on the traffic network, the City Traffic Operations Department did not require a full traffic study of this application. Page 3 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria The second method by which traffic congestion is minimized is the Church's shuttle system that will be available to persons staying at the Oak Cove hotel. This shuttle system makes a re,._ i.lar circulatory route to and from all of the Church's properties within the Downtown campus providing access to all properties, thus eliminating the need for individual cars. Finally, the Oak Cove site is located a very short walk from the Flag Building where parishioners will go every day for their services, classes and counseling. Parishioners may walk from the Oak Cove building to the Osceola Avenue entrance to the Ft. Harrison, walk through the Ft. Harrison property and then use the skywalk across Ft. Harrison Avenue to enter the Flag Building. Therefore, the traffic generated by this project is extremely small due to the use characteristics of the Oak Cove hotel and the campus-wide shuttle service provided by the Church. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity of the site contains a mixture of uses including City and County administrative offices, Peace Memorial Church's parking lot, the Ft. Harrison Hotel and new residential condominiums under construction. The diversity of the area is as expected and desired within the most intense subdistrict of the Downtown. The project will contribute to the urban character of the area through its design and in attracting people to this hotel. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. It is not expected nor is it typical that a hotel and the counseling center would result in adverse visual, acoustic or olfactory effects. The hours of operation are consistent with other hotels and consistent with the full- time activity desired in the Downtown. Page 4 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria II. RESPONSES TO THE FLEXIBLE CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPME" : T PROJECT (Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code) 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Both the interim and long-term uses of the property are allowed in the Downtown zoning district and are consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. In addition, the property complies with all of the development standards except for the number of on-site parking spaces. A detailed parking analysis has been submitted with this application that demonstrates that the Church parishioners staying at Church-operated hotels do not generally arrive by car or rent cars and therefore, the amount of parking required is substantially less than what the City code requires. The study demonstrated that a Church-operated hotel demands only 1 parking space for each five rooms in contrast to the code requirement of 1 space for each hotel room. Therefore, the 53 available on-site parking spaces will meet the demand of 49 parking spaces for this hotel. In addition, the analysis demonstrated that in the ultimate buildout as a 252 room hotel, the project will generate only 6 inbound and 5 outbound trips in the p.m. peak hour. Please see the parking study for more detail on the results of the study. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The property is located within the Downtown Core district of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Downtown Core is the most intense and diverse district serving as the government center and principal employment area of the Downtown. An additional hotel to serve the Church's parishioners will result in more people in the Downtown core throughout the week and these additional people will patronize the downtown's shops and restaurants, thus contributing to the vitality of the downtown. The Downtown Core district does not have a height limit and through the use of TDRs, the project will comply with the hotel intensity. As stated above, both the interim and long- term uses of the property are allowed in the Downtown zoning district and the only variance requested is to the number of on-site parking spaces. Page 5 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The redevelopment of the Oak Cove building will not have any effect on the ability for surrounding properties to redevelop since the hotel use is a desirable one in the Downtown and since there are no off-site impacts that would affect surrounding properties. It should also be noted that the existing building footprint will remain as it currently exists with only a small expansion to the lobby and a replacement of the existing porte cochere with a new design. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The immediately adjoining use to the south is a parking garage for Pinellas County employees. Therefore, the new use of the property as a hotel will not have any effect on a parking garage. The adjoining use to the north is a vacant lot owned by Opus and whose ultimate use has not yet been approved by the City. As is common in redevelopment areas, bringing the building back to life with people and activity will add to the liveliness of the area. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The underlying future land use category for the site is Central Business District (CBD) and the project is governed by and is consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as discussed below. The proposed use as a Page 6 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria hotel will be compatible with the existing uses and the residential condominium under construction to the north. The project meets objective (a) above since the hotel use is allowed in the Downtown zoning district. The project meets objective (c) above since the hotel use will enable the Church of Scientology to accommodate additional parishioners visiting its campus, thus representing an expansion of an existing economic contributor. The visiting parishioners patronize the businesses of downtown and will therefore, contribute to the City's economy through their purchases while in Clearwater. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the city; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: L Changes in horizontal building planes; H. Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; Hi. Variety in materials, colors and textures; iv. Distinctive fenestration patterns; v. Building stepbacks; and vi. Distinctive roof forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. With regard to the flexibility items listed in the above criteria, the only one from which the project requests a deviation is the number of parking spaces. The justification for the parking variance is demonstrated in the parking study prepared by Florida Design Consultants as part of this application package and further described on pages 3-4, Item 1.4 of this attachment. The proposed use is allowable.in the Downtown zoning district. There are no lot width, setbacks or height requirements in the Downtown zoning district; therefore, these criteria are not applicable to this project. Page 7 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria The project will not impede the orderly development in the vicinity of the site and supports the emerging character of the area; compliance with these criteria 6a and 6c have been discussed in detail on pages 2-4, Item I.1, 2, 5 and 6 and page 6, Item 11. 3 and 4 of this attachment. The project complies with criterion 6b and the applicable design guidelines as described in detail on pages 11 and 12, Item IV, of this attachment. There are no significant design changes to the fagade of the building; therefore, the existing building is not subject to compliance with the design guidelines as if it were a new structure. However, the proposed addition of a porte cochere complies with criterion 6d for the addition by including a change in the horizontal building plane for the porte cochere addition which differentiates it from the main building; using columns on the porte cochere as an architectural detail to support, identify and enhance the porte cochere design; using a variety of materials, colors and textures on the porte cochere and columns; and using a distinctive roof form for the new porte cochere that is consistent with the roof design of the existing building. The only design elements of this subsection that are not incorporated into the porte cochere addition design are a distinctive fenestration pattern and a building stepback, neither of which would typically be constructed as part of a porte cochere since it is not a habitable part of the building. With regard to criterion 6e, the project proposes landscaping and buffers appropriate to the Downtown zoning district and the desired urban character. The building currently exists on the site and only a minor addition is proposed so there is no opportunity to revise the distances between buildings. Therefore, this project meets the applicable criteria to justify the only deviation requested which is a reduction in the number of parking spaces. Page 8 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria r: f I. COMPLIANCE WITH THE DOWNTOWNREDEVELOPMENTPLAN As described above, the Oak Cove Building is located in downtown Clearwater on South Osceola Avenue. The City of Clearwater adopted a new plan for downtown in 2004 entitled the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This plan divided the downtown into six character districts, each with distinct character, vision, function, development patterns and policies. The Oak Cove Building is located within the Downtown Core character district which is the most intense and most diverse district within the downtown plan area. The Downtown Core character district is intended to remain as the center of government and principal employment area and is encouraged to develop with residential uses to complement and diversify the community. The Downtown Core district has the highest density and intensity measures of all the character districts at a maximum of 4.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for non-residential use, 70 dwelling units per acre for residential use and 95 units per acre for hotel use. The project is also consistent with several goals, objectives and policies of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan listed below: Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. Objective 1G: Residential uses in Downtown are encouraged with a variety of densities, housing types and affordability consistent with the character districts. The proposed hotel will accommodate visitors to Downtown and assist in adding livability and liveliness to the Downtown. Goal 2: Create an environment where both people and vehicles can circulate throughout Downtown safely and effectively. Objective 211: A variety of parking solutions for motorized and non- motorized vehicles shall be pursued to support redevelopment while maintaining ease of access and parking throughout the Downtown. As part of the Church of Scientology's downtown campus, hotel guests can utilize the shuttle system operated by the Church that circulates throughout the Downtown. In addition, the close proximity of the Oak Cove building to the Flag Building will allow parishioners to easily walk to their services, classes and counseling held in the main building. Page 9of12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria Objective 31): Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The project's modern style contributes to the variety of architectural styles within the Downtown. Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The project has designed and will construct an enjoyable pedestrian walkway that connects this building to the existing sidewalk network and ultimately to surrounding buildings. Policy 7: Transfer of Development Rights are permitted for all projects to assist development provided that both the sending and receiving sites are located in the Downtown Plan area. Approval of Transfer of Development Rights on a site may allow an increase in the development potential in excess of the maximum development potential of the applicable character district. The number of development rights transferred to any site with a Future Land Use Plan Designation of Central Business District (CBD) are not limited, however, transfers to sites with a designation other than CBD shall not exceed the applicable maximum development potential by 20 percent. All uses of transfer of development rights shall ensure that the receiving site remains consistent with the vision of the applicable character district. The project does propose a TDR of 82 hotel rooms (for a total of 252 hotel rooms) transferred from the Central Chiller Plant located at the northwest corner of Court Street and East Avenue. The TDR application accompanying this Flexible site plan application explains in detail how the TDR is consistent with the Downtown Plan. Both the sending and receiving sites are located in the Downtown Plan Area and are designated CBD; therefore, there is no limit on the amount of TDRs that may be transferred. Page 10 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES The Oak Cove Building was designed and constructed many years prior to the City of Clearwater's adoption of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and its Design Guidelines. Improvements to the building's entrance canopy and to the interior to renovate the building for a hotel will be made as part of this application. As stated in the Design Guidelines on page 80: Existing developments that do not comply with the requirements of the Guidelines shall not be required to be brought into full compliance with the Guidelines at the time the Guidelines are adopted. Any improvement proposed to an existing development, however, will be required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Guidelines related to the improvements. The only improvements proposed to the existing building are a small addition to the lobby and a new porte cochere. The project also will update the parking lot and related landscaping and build a new internal sidewalk connecting the building entrance to Osceola Avenue. All other improvements are internal to the building, relating to the floor plan and mechanical systems of the building. Therefore, the existing building facades are not subject to the Design Guidelines. It should be noted, however, that there are some elements of the site and building design that are consistent with the key principles of the Design Guidelines and the project's consistency with the Guidelines is briefly described below. The Design Guidelines have three main sections to guide new construction: site design, building placement and building design. Each is discussed below as applied to the Oak Cove Building. Site Design The Design Guidelines encourage retention of the existing street grid pattern and the existing street pattern is maintained by the project. The Guidelines encourage vehicular access from secondary streets, unobtrusive parking lots and good pedestrian circulation patterns. Due to the configuration of the property with its sole access to Osceola Avenue, the driveway and parking lot must remain in their existing locations. However, the small number of automobile trips to this site and the new pedestrian path will assist in making the site pedestrian friendly. In addition, the site enjoys easy access to the existing sidewalk network that connects the building to surrounding properties. Building Placement The Guidelines encourage the building's location to contribute to the streetscape, buildings to be oriented towards the street, the maintenance of appropriate separations between buildings and building coverage consistent with the character district. Page 11 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria The project meets the principles of building placement as the building is oriented towards the major street of Osceola Avenue, which is the major street frontage. The development pattern along Osceola Avenue is one of large ownership with deep lots. This pattern is reflected in the Oak Cove site and the building location/orientation reflects the narrow and deep lot configuration. The building's site placement creates appropriate spacing of the building from its adjoining properties. An improved porte cochere is planned to provide easy access to the building and to protect pedestrians as they enter the building. Building Design The Guidelines encourage new construction to contribute to the character district and to respect the existing pattern of development through its form, mass and scale, and architectural style. The Oak Cove building reflects a modern style that assists in the creation of diverse architectural styles within Downtown. In summary, the Oak Cove Building is consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan in the following ways: The project is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Plan; The project is consistent with the Downtown Core character district generally and with the specific provisions of the district regarding the use and intensity standards; and The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines. Page 12 of 12 REVISED NOVEMBER 9, 2006 ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT D RECEIVED FLEXIBLE APPLICATION CRITERIA YUy O 9 200 OAK COVE BUILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT 210 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE CITY OF CLEARWATER The purpose of this request is to approve the Church of Scientology's Oak Cove Building as a hotel in downtown Clearwater. The Oak Cove building has received previous approval by the City of Clearwater on December 27, 2004 as a dormitory accessory to the Church's campus (City Case No. FLS 200411067)_ Due to the growth in the number of parishioners coming to the Church's facilities, there is a need for additional hotel rooms to accommodate these parishioners. The Oak Cove Building is perfectly located within a short walking distance to the new Flag Building, where services, classes and counseling will be held. In addition, the previous use of Oak Cove as a nursing/congregate care facility renders its floor plan easily renovated for use as a hotel. Accompanying this Flexible Application to approve the hotel use for the Oak Cove Building is a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) application. The Oak Cove site would accommodate 170 hotel rooms in accordance with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Downtown Core District (95 hotel rooms per acre X 1.79 acres = 170 rooms). However, the building's floor plans can accommodate 252 hotel rooms, therefore, a TDR application to transfer hotel rooms from another Church-owned site is requested. The sending site for the TDR is the Church's Central Chiller Plant located at the northwest corner of Court Street and East Avenue. The Chiller Plant is an underutilization of the site; therefore, there is a substantial amount of development potential available to be transferred from this site. In addition to the ultimate use of the Oak Cove Building as a hotel, the applicant proposes an interim use of the building as a hotel and Church use for one-on-one counseling. The need for this interim use is due to the renovations planned for the Ft. Harrision Hotel immediately east of the Oak Cove. The applicant proposes to first renovate the Oak Cove, then move the hotel operations and counseling center from the Ft Harrison into the Oak Cove. The next step is for the Ft. Harrison Hotel to be renovated for use as a hotel only. Upon completion of the Flag Building, all church activities operating at the Oak Cove will be moved into the Flag Building and the Oak Cove Building can then function totally as a hotel. In summary, the applicant requests Flexible approval of the Church of Scientology Oak Cove Building as a hotel for its long -term use and a hotel with church counseling activities for an interim use. Both requests are pursuant to and consistent with the Downtown District in accordance with the Community Development Code. Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria The proposed time line for the interim use and long-term uses are shown below: ORIGINAL Interim Use-Hotel and Church Counseling RECEIVED Oak Cove ready for occupancy May, 2007 1`!OV 0 9 2006 Lonia-Term Use-Hotel PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Oak cove converted to Hotel only June, 2048 The project's compliance with the General Applicability Criteria, the Flexible Criteria for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan are described below. L RESPONSES TO THE GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA (Section 3- 913 of the Community Development Code) 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The property is located within the Downtown Core Character District of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as are all surrounding properties. The Downtown Core District is the most intense and the most diverse district serving as the government center and principal employment area of the Downtown: The design of the Oak Cove Building is intentionally urban in scale and character. The intensity of the building is consistent with the Downtown Core District's desired development pattem. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The properties to the north of the site include a vacant parcel owned by Opus, City Hall, Peace Memorial Church's parking lot and the residential condominiums under construction by Opus. The properties to the south of the site are the County's parking garage and its administrative office facilities in several buildings. To the east of the site is the Church's Ft, Harrison Hotel. There is no development to the west of the site except the west-bound approach to Memorial Causeway Bridge, therefore, there will be no impacts on any properties to the west. This section of the Downtown Core subdistrict is redeveloping at a high density and intensity as planned so as to contribute to the activity level desired for Downtown. Page 2 of 12 UI?If?ItV'AL RECENED Oak Cove Building ?UV 0 9 2006 Response to Criteria PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or worldng in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The uses of the property as a hotel and counseling center pose no adverse affects on the health or safety of people residing or working in the area. A hotel is a common and desirable use in a downtown and will contribute to the activity level in downtown. The interim use of the property as both a hotel and counseling center also will not pose any adverse effects on the surrounding properties. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The site currently has two driveways on Osceola Avenue that provide access to the parking area. This application proposes to continue to use the Osceola driveways since the site has no other street frontage that can be used for access. (Please note that although the site's western boundary fronts on Pierce Boulevard, access via this street is limited as a result of the new Memorial Causeway Bridge approach.) The design of the parking area allows for two- way movement throughout the parking lot to ease the vehicular flow. The parking lot will be upgraded with new paving, striping and new landscaping. In addition, a new pedestrian walkway is proposed to be located beginning at the front entrance and connecting to the Osceola Avenue sidewalk to provide for safe pedestrian movement through the site by separating pedestrians from vehicles. The proposed development has been designed to minimize traffic congestion in several ways. First, the use characteristics of this Church-operated hotel generate a very low number of parking spaces and a very low number of trips in the p.m. peak hour as compared to a non-church operated hotel. In the parking analysis submitted as part of this application, the applicant has demonstrated that hotels operated by the Church of Scientology generate substantially less trips than other hotels. This is due to the fact that the parishioners typically arrive at local airports and use the Church-provided shuttle service from the airport, thus eliminating the need to rent a car for their visit. In fact as demonstrated in the parking analysis, a Church hotel requires only one space for every five hotel rooms based on a site-specific study of the four existing Church hotels in downtown Clearwater. The study also demonstrated that in the ultimate buildout use as a hotel, the building will generate only 6 inbound and 5 outbound trips in the p.m. peak hour. Due to the extremely small number of trips and related lack of impact on the traffic network, the City Traffic Operations Department did not require a full traffic study of this application. Page 3 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria The second method by. which traffic congestion is minimized is the Church's shuttle system that will be available to persons staying at the Oak Cove hotel. This shuttle system makes a regular circulatory route to and from all of the Church's properties within the Downtown campus providing access to all properties, thus eliminating the need for individual cars. Finally, the Oak Cove site is located a very short walk from the Flag Building where parishioners will go every day for their services, classes and counseling. Parishioners may walk from the Oak Cove building to the Osceola Avenue entrance to the Ft. Harrison, walk through the Ft. Harrison property and then use the skywalk across Ft. Harrison Avenue to enter the Flag Building. Therefore, the traffic generated by this project is extremely small due to the use characteristics of the Oak Cove hotel and the campus-wide shuttle service provided by the Church. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. . The immediate vicinity of the site contains a mixture of uses including City and County administrative offices, Peace Memorial Church's parking lot, the Ft. Harrison Hotel and new residential condominiums under construction. The diversity of the area is as expected and desired within the most intense subdistrict of the Downtown. The project will contribute to the urban character of the area through its design and in attracting people to this hotel. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. It is not expected nor is it typical that a hotel and the counseling center would result in adverse visual, acoustic or olfactory effects. The hours of operation are consistent with other hotels and consistent with the full- time activity desired in the Downtown. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 4 of 12 RECEIVED Nov o 9 2006 Oak Cove Building PLANNING DEPARTMENT Response to Criteria CITY OF CLEARWATER II. RESPONSES TO THE FLEXIBLE CRITERIA FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code) 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Both the interim and long-term uses of the property are allowed in the Downtown zoning district and are consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. In addition, the property complies with all of the development standards except for the number of on-site parking spaces. A detailed parking analysis has been submitted with this application that demonstrates that the Church parishioners staying at Church-operated hotels do not generally arrive by car or rent cars and therefore, the amount of parking required is substantially less than what the City code requires. The study demonstrated that a Church-operated hotel demands only 1 parking space for each five rooms in contrast to the code requirement of 1 space for each hotel room. Therefore, the 53 available on-site parking spaces will meet the demand of 49 parking spaces for this hoteL In addition, the analysis demonstrated that in the ultimate buildout as a 252 room hotel, the project will generate only 6 inbound and 5 outbound trips in the p.m. peak hour. Please see the parking study for more detail on the results of the study. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The property is located within the Downtown Core district of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Downtown Core is the most intense and diverse district serving as the government center and principal employment area of the Downtown. An additional hotel to serve the Church's parishioners will result in more people in the Downtown core throughout the week and these additional people will patronize the downtown's shops and restaurants, thus contributing to the vitality of the downtown. The Downtown Core district does not have a height limit and through the use of TDRs, the project will comply with the hotel intensity. As stated above, both the interim and long- term uses of the property are allowed in the Downtown zoning district and the only variance requested is to the number of on-site parking spaces. Page 5of12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0 9 2006 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The redevelopment of the Oak Cove building will not have any effect on the ability for surrounding properties to redevelop since the hotel use is a desirable one in the Downtown and since there are no off-site impacts that would affect surrounding properties. It should also be noted that the existing building footprint will remain as it currently exists with only a small expansion to the lobby and a replacement of the existing porte cochere with a new design. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The immediately adjoining use to the south is a parking garage for Pinellas County employees. Therefore, the new use of the property as a hotel will not have any effect on a parking garage. The adjoining use to the north is a vacant lot owned by Opus and whose ultimate use has not yet been approved by the City. As is common in redevelopment areas, bringing the building back to life with people and activity will add to the liveliness of the area. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The underlying future land use category for the site is Central Business District (CBD) and the project is governed by and is consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan as discussed below. The proposed use as a Page 6 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria 0 hotel will be compatible with the existing uses and the residential condominium under construction to the north. ORIGINAL RECEIVED f-JV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The project meets objective (a) above since the hotel use is allowed in the Downtown zoning district. The project meets objective (c) above since the hotel use will enable the Church of Scientology to accommodate additional parishioners visiting its campus, thus representing an expansion of an existing economic contributor. The visiting parishioners patronize the businesses of downtown and will therefore, contribute to the City's economy through their purchases while in Clearwater. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: s a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the city; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: i. Changes in horizontal building planes; ii. Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; iii. Variety in materials, colors and textures; iv. Distinctive fenestration patterns; v. Building stepbacks; and vi. Distinctive roof forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. With regard to the flexibility items listed in the above criteria, the only one from which the project requests a deviation is the number of parking spaces. The justification for the parking variance is demonstrated in the parking study prepared by Florida Design Consultants as part of this application package and further described on pages 3-4, Item 1.4 of this attachment. The proposed use is allowable in the Downtown zoning district. There are no lot width, setbacks or height requirements in the Downtown zoning district; therefore, these criteria are not applicable to this project. Page 7 of 12 0 0 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria The project will not impede the orderly development in the vicinity of the site and supports the emerging character of the area; compliance with these criteria 6a and 6c have been discussed in detail on pages 2-4, Item 1. 1, 2, 5 and 6 and page 6, Item II. 3 and 4 of this attachment. The project complies with criterion 6b and the applicable design guidelines as described in detail on pages 11 and 12, Item IV, of this attachment. The project complies with criterion 6d for the addition proposed for the existing building by repeating the building roof's parapet design on the porte cochere and providing an enhanced column design on the porte cochere. There are no significant design changes to the facade of the building; therefore, the existing building is not subject to compliance with the design guidelines as if it were a new structure. With regard to criterion 6e, the project proposes landscaping and buffers appropriate to the Downtown zoning district and the desired urban character. The building currently exists on the site and only a minor addition is proposed so there is no opportunity to revise the distances between buildings. Therefore, this project meets the applicable criteria to justify the only deviation requested which is a reduction in the number of parking spaces. ORIGINAL RECEIVED moV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 8 of 12 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Oak Cove Building 0 9 2?a6 Response to Criteria - PLANNING DEPAOMEWT CITY OF C! EAR4A!c t ,,t M. COMPLIANCE WrM THE DOWNTOWNREDEVELOPMENT PLAN As described above, the Oak Cove Building is located in downtown Clearwater on South Osceola Avenue. The City of Clearwater adopted a new plan for downtown in 2004 entitled the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This plan divided the downtown into six character districts, each with distinct character, vision, function; development patterns and policies. The Oak Cove Building is located within the Downtown Core character district which is the most intense and most diverse district within the downtown plan area. The Downtown Core character district is intended to remain as the center of government and principal employment area and is encouraged to develop with residential uses to complement and diversify the community. The Downtown Core district has the highest density and intensity measures of all the character districts at a maximum of 4.0 Floor Area Ratio-(FAR) for non-residential use, 70 dwelling units per acre for residential use and 95 units per acre for hotel use. The project is also consistent with several goals, objectives and policies of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan listed below: Goal 1:. Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. Objective 1G: Residential uses in Downtown are encouraged with a variety of densities, housing types and affordability consistent with the character districts. The proposed hotel will accommodate visitors to Downtown and assist in adding livability and liveliness to the Downtown. Goal 2: Create an environment where both people and vehicles can circulate throughout Downtown safely and effectively. Objective 2H: A variety of parldng solutions for motorized and non- motorized vehicles shall be pursued to support redevelopment while maintaining ease of access and parldng throughout the Downtown. As part of the Church of Scientology's downtown campus, hotel guests can utilize the shuttle system operated by the Church that circulates throughout the Downtown. In addition, the close proximity of the Oak Cove building to the Flag Building will allow parishioners to easily walk to their services, classes and counseling held in the main building. Page 9 of 12 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Oak Cove Building NOV 0 9 2006 Response to Criteria PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEP Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The project's modern style contributes to the variety of architectural styles within the Downtown. Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The project has designed and will construct an enjoyable pedestrian walkway that connects this building to the existing sidewalk network and ultimately to surrounding buildings. Policy 7: Transfer of Development Rights are permitted for all projects to assist development provided that both the sending and receiving sites are located in the Downtown Plan area. Approval of Transfer of Development Rights on a site may allow an increase in the development potential in excess of the maximum development potential of the applicable character district. The number of development rights transferred to any site with a Future Land Use Plan Designation of Central Business District (CBD) are not limited, however, transfers to sites with a designation other than CBD shall not exceed the applicable maximum development potential by 20 percent. All uses of transfer of development rights shall ensure that the receiving site remains consistent with the vision of the applicable character district. The project does propose a TDR of 82 hotel rooms (for a total of 252 hotel rooms) transferred from the Central Chiller Plant located at the northwest comer of Court Street and East Avenue. The TDR application accompanying this Flexible site plan application explains in detail how the TDR is consistent with the Downtown Plan. Both the sending and receiving sites are located in the Downtown Plan Area and are designated CBD; therefore, there is no limit on the amount of TDRs that may be transferred. Page 10 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 zoos PLANNING DEPARTMEM IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF CLEAPWATEP The Oak Cove Building was designed and constructed many years prior to the City of Clearwater's adoption of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and its Design Guidelines. Improvements to the building's entrance canopy and to the interior to renovate the building for a hotel will be made as part of this application. As stated in the Design Guidelines on page 80: Existing developments that do not comply with the requirements of the Guidelines shall not be required to be brought into full compliance with the Guidelines at the time the Guidelines are adopted. Any improvement proposed to an existing development, however, will be required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Guidelines related to the improvements. The only improvements proposed to the existing building are a small addition to the lobby and a new porte cochere. The project also will update the parking lot and related landscaping and build a new internal sidewalk connecting the building entrance to Osceola Avenue. All other improvements are internal to the building, relating to the floor plan and mechanical systems of the building. Therefore, the existing building facades are not subject to the Design Guidelines. It should be noted, however, that there are some elements of the site and building design that are consistent with the key principles of the Design Guidelines and the project's consistency with the Guidelines is briefly described below. The Design Guidelines have three main sections to guide new construction: site design, building placement and building design. Each is discussed below as applied to the Oak Cove Building. Site Design The Design Guidelines encourage retention of the existing street grid pattern and the existing street pattern is maintained by the project. The Guidelines encourage vehicular access from secondary streets, unobtrusive parking lots and good pedestrian circulation patterns. Due to the configuration of the property with its sole access to Osceola Avenue, the driveway and parking lot must remain in their existing locations. However, the small number of automobile trips to this site and the new pedestrian path will assist in making the site pedestrian friendly. In addition, the site enjoys easy access to the existing sidewalk network that connects the building to surrounding properties. Building Placement The Guidelines encourage the building's location to contribute to the streetscape, buildings to be oriented towards the street, the maintenance of appropriate separations between buildings and building coverage consistent with the character district. Page 11 of 12 Oak Cove Building Response to Criteria 1---i The project meets the principles of building placement as the building is oriented towards the major street of Osceola Avenue, which is the major street frontage. The development pattern along Osceola Avenue is one of large ownership with deep lots. This pattern is reflected in the Oak Cove site and the building location/orientation reflects the narrow and deep lot configuration. The building's site placement creates appropriate spacing of the building from its adjoining properties. An improved porte cochere is planned to provide easy access to the building and to protect pedestrians as they enter the building. Building Design The Guidelines encourage new construction to contribute to the character district and to respect the existing pattern of development through its form, mass and scale, and architectural style. The Oak Cove building reflects a modem style that assists in the creation of diverse architectural styles within Downtown. In summary, the Oak Cove Building is consistent with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan in the following ways: • The project is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Plan; • The project is consistent with the Downtown Core character district generally and with the specific provisions of the district regarding the use and intensity standards; and • The project is consistent with the Design Guidelines. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEP Page 12 of 12 c 99?'AT M t??J CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 APPLICANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT'S NAME Church of Scientology Religious Trust MAILING ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER 319 S. Garden 727-467-5000 AGENT NAME James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue. Clearwater _FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER 727-638-9088 FAX NUMBER : 727-445-7277 SITE TO WHICH THE TDR WILL BE TRANSFERRED (receiver site)- PROPERTY OWNER Church of Scientology Religious Trust MAILING ADDRESS 319 S. Garden Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 _ PHONE NUMBER 727-467-5000 FAX NUMBER : 727-445-7277 LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Attachment A (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET) STREET ADDRESS 210 S. Osceola Avenue PARCEL NUMBER 16-29-15-62131-000-0010, 16-29-15-62131-000-0020 ZONING DISTRICT Downtown District SIZE OF SITE 1.79 ac / 78,050 sq. ft. CURRENT USE OF THE Vacant Building PROPERTY (# OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWELLING UNITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT) Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Clearwater, FL 33756 FAX NUMBER : 727-445-7277 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGORE ALLOCATED TO THIS SITE? - 170 hotel r00om HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE BEING TRANSFERRED? - 82 hotel rooms HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? YES -? NO IF YES, HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED? -N.A. IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES ? NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: SITE FROM WHICH THE TDR WILL BE TRANSFERRED (sender site): PROPERTY OWNER Church of Scientology Religious Trust MAILING ADDRESS 319 S. Garden Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER 727-467-5000 - FAX NUMBER : _ 727-445-7277 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Attachment B (IF IN METES AND BOUNDS, ATTACH A SEPARATE SHEET) STREET ADDRESS 1051 Caw ` ?T - - PARCEL NUMBER See Attachment B ZONING DISTRICT Downtown District - ?lol N 5 f - - - SIZE OF SITE 40,443 s.f. , 'acres p,q2.81(,ap me-2; CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY Church of Energy Plant, Stormwater Pond - - (p OF HOTEL ROOMS, DWELLING UNITS, COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA, VACANT) HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE ALLOCATED TO THIS SITE? hotel rooms IBS • I1 5qCo HOW MANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ARE BEING TRANSFERRED? ?OKhotel rooms - 931 c>? HAVE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY BEEN TRANSFERRED TO OR FROM THIS PROPERTY? YES _ NO THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION: - COPY OF THE WARRANTY DEED OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THE RECEIVER SITE; _ STATEMENT THAT THE DEED OF TRANSFER WILL BE RECORDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. _ STATEMENT THAT THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS REFLECTED IN THE INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE HAVE NOT BEEN CONVEYED TO ANOTHER PERSON. Page 2 of 2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SEALED SURVEY FOR BO SENDER AND THE RECEIVER SITES WITH THE SQUA E- OTAGE OR ACREAGE OF EACH SITE. COPY OF THE ZONING MAPS WITH SENDER AND RECEIVER SITE CLEARLY HIGHLIGHTED AND LABELED I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this ----4?n - day of A.D., vils- to me and/or by ---------- who is personally nown ha&pcaduced as- Notary public, ?- my commission expires: Notary Public - State of S: application forms/development review/transfer of development rights application.doc Bonded BY NOflOnpl NotaryAssn, ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN" CITY OF CIFAPWATF° Page 3 of 2 M • TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 210 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE ATTACHMENT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR RECEIVING SITE OAK COVE, A COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Condominium Plat Book 102, Pages 92-95, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel Numbers: 16-29-15-62131-000-0010 16-29-15-62131-000-0020 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMWI CITY OF CLEAPWATP:r ;pcm KAChurch of ScientologyTorms\Transfer of Development Rights.doc r a TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 210 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE ATTACHMENT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SENDING SITE This parcel contains 63,427 square feet or 1.46 acres, more or less. Lots 2, Block 12, MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, AND a portion of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12,13 and 14 and all of Lot 15, Block 12, COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 52, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Being at the Southeast corner of said Lot 9, thence S.89°54'54"W., along the South boundaries of said Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, a distance of 350.00 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 15; thence N.00°07'48"W., along the West boundaries of said Lots 15 and 2, a distance of 298.51 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence S.89°31'06"E., along the North boundary of said Lot 2, a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence S.00°07'48"E., along the East boundaries of said Lots 2 and 15, a distance of 212.92 feet; thence N.89°54'54"E., a distance of 299.99 feet to the East boundary of said Lot 9; thence S.00°08'01"E., along said East boundary, a distance of 85.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. This parcel contains 40,443 square feet or 0.93 acres, more or less. Portions of Parcel Numbers: 15-29-15-54450-012-0020 15-29-15-54450-012-0030 15-29-15-54450-012-0080 16-29-15-18648-012-0130 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARIMEN' CITY OF CLEARW4TF" A Clearwater Zoning sack L.aa. H.IV E.a Gea.a -. _ _ . Clearwater 'toning W P•M N•roo? E•,t la,• Q on„?..? tw..ae Z.?eM -°?'?a 8 B.IaaY e.aea Laga . _... 'k r LoeaM Rsewlls Address Score 1 210 S OSCEOLA 77 $ 2105 OSCE_ 77 d 1201 OSCEOUI 52 T 809 OSCEOLA 52I 01R LauRa It uuna sr A 4 o m cLfvELAND ST MEE EFT-1 • E -??'- ? v?eRee s* E.- ? 1 RECEIVItV??IT? • FIVU0kLW ST SEND "las, Layers rd fib Parcel lnla niaw j 0 Streets Parcels Future Land Use kd Zoning t _ Pinellas County g Aerial Photo w•..+u.a tic+aa • • LeaerM . im UE aa!srHUr sr R ROCEas f, 1 = e • • , . • , . E I.._._ R )GEM fT ® Q Click on a number to locate the address on the map.Tle;n press ® on the toolbar. Click an the marked parcel to sec Parcel and Flood a..,,. roar, Hazard Information. 210 S Osceola TDR Application REMED1016/2006 C RCWM4 DfSi'C,NCON5 4WA M • w TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS 210 SOUTH OSCEOLA AVENUE ATTACHMENT C STATEMENT REGARDING RECORDATION And NO PREVIOUS TRANSFER STATEMENT REGARDING RECORDATION OF DEED The applicant does hereby confirm that prior to issuance of a building permit to convert the property located at 210 South Osceola Avenue to a hotel, that he will record a special warranty deed that specifies the amount of transferable development rights which are being conveyed and the real property from which the rights are transferred. STATEMENT REGARDING NO PREVIOUS TRANSFER The applicant does hereby confirm that the development rights requested in this application to be transferred from the site located at 645 Franklin Street have not been previously transferred or conveyed to any other person. The development rights requested in this application to be transferred from the site located at 645 Franklin Street have not been previously used or exercised by any other person. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 05 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEINI r CITY OF CLEARWVER 0 0 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS SENDING SITE SURVEY AND DEED ORIGINAL RECEIVED A G 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER This instiurnent was prepared by and retuutn to: ?S, 2?c299 LY-30- 1?9g ° :46or P 1?CL AS CC ROBERT E. J OH1NTS ON, ESQ. ? SK 10607 PG 1095 5 S lIt)It lUlt )tllt X111 till IIIII Gllt 1IJI Jill all Broad and Cassel 100 North Tampa Street 6C22660 07-30-1999 15:46:52 SS5 Suite 3500 Oi 0000000000 Tampa, Florida 33602 D11-MARUEST RECORDING 001 PAGES 1 `. DOC STAmp - DR219 3 66.00 $ 70 Property Appraiser's RECORD FEES 9 . $3.00 - Parcel Identification Nb:15/29/15/54450/012/0050 TOTAL: $9. 70 P CHECK An'TEBDEtED: . $9,70 - [Space Above This Lin e for Reco CHANGE: rding DCHAN $.00 W A R R A N T Y D E E D (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture made this day of _ 1999 BETWEEN MAR.KWEST, INC., a Florida corporation, whose post office address is 118 E. Jefferson Street, Orlando., of the County of ORANGE, State of FL 328.01, Grantor, and MARY SALINAS, GLEN E. STILO, SARA CUNNLN'GH-kNi 1, CATHERINTE RIN'DER.and BEN SHAW and their successors as the TRUSTEES OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, s Florida corporation, whose post office address is 118 N. Ft. Harrison, Clearwater, FL 34615, State of FL , Grantee. Grantor purchased the below described land as agent for the Grantee. Grantor's purchase was made with the intent to transfer the below described property Ito the Grantee and it was purchased exclusively with the Grantee's funds. - Grantor's funds were not used in the original purchase and no monetary consideration has passed between Grantor and Grantee pertaining to this instrument. I WiTlVESSETH, That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 001100'S - ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the sal ' Grantee, and - Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land situate, lying and beingn PLt??FELLAS County, Florida, to-wit: 01 LINO 7 LOT 3.,- BLOCK 12, MAGNOLIA TARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT R-LC THEREOF ON FIDE IN TEE 'OFFI:CE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT mT --' ?' COURT LNAND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED IN PLAT PEES , BOOK 3, PAGE 70, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN PINFELL4S COUNTY, FLORIDA. ocurnentary Tax P:d. S - 1'/C $ REV THE PROPERTY IS NOT HOMESTEAD. - snta gibfe Tax Pd Karleen F De: Clerk, Pinellas county TOT --and said Grantor does hereby .fully warrant the title to said land, and' ax dawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. In Fitness Whereof, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's band and seal the day and year first above written. MARKFYES.T,INC. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Sheila V. Ramon, President 118 E. Jefferson Street 0 2??13 Orlando, FL 32801 i !'U? 3 STATE OF FLORIDA COuN-ry OF FTC.. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2-1 day o,; 1999 by Sheila V. Ramon, who is personally lmown to me o7 Droduced as identification and .did n 9t take an oath. My Commission Expires -42?j 9 Not public A. BAXT ?„ a '? pMk1ST10f1 f „^„ g?y? P_=* ed, tvped or stamped name ?-snsuor?,w .? TPA if iEe,LgT3SZBF.7 1H68 AMI eT2F.% _ O ES-2-52300 JLY-2j22S 3:< ?n P1N-LLRS CD SK 10S07 po ;700 This instrument was prepared by and return to: 'T5 1 al"I fIn1 tml 1,11171 °111'MM, M11IIV1111 1 wm ag ,1111 aui 1 IlIii ROBERT E. JOHNSON, ESQ. 60226614 07-30-1999 15:47:32 SSE Broad and Cassel 01. 0000000000 100 North Tampa Street DED-MARKUEST Suite 3500 RECORDING' 001 PAGES 1 $6.00 DR219 c Tam Tampa, Florida 33602 RECORD PUS $.70 $3.00 Pro e TOTAL. $9.70 p rty Appraiser's P CHECK ANT. TENDERED. $9.'70 Parcel Identification No: 13/29/15/54450/012/0030 CHANGE; 1.00 [Space Above This Line for Recording Data] W A R R A N T Y D E E D (STATUTORY F'ORIM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture made this day of 1999 a Florida corporation, whose post office address is V18 E. Jefferson B BETWEEN o???County of ORANGE, State of FL 32.801, Grantor, and MARY SALLNAS, GLEN E. STTLO, SARA CUNNINGHAM, CATHERINE BINDER and BEN SHAW and their successors as the TRUSTEES OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, a Florida corporation, whose post o$ce address is 118 N. Ft. Harrison, Clearwater, FL 34615, State of FL, Grantee. Grantor purchased the below described land as agent for the Grantee. Grantor's purchase was made with the intent to transfer the below described property to the Grantee and it was purchased exclusively with the Grantee's funds. Grantor's fiords were not used in the original purchase and no monetary consideration has passed between Grantor and Grantee pertaining to this instrument. `ti1TNESSETH, That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00,1! DO'S (510.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee. the Teceipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land situate, lying and being in PD•iEL-LAS County, Florida, to=wit: O'RD[Nt3 LOT 3, BLOCK 12, MAGNOLIA P -?' TEEREOF ON '?? ACCORDING TO THE PLAT _ r FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF TIE "CIRCUIT Es COURT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED TN PLAT TF BOOK 3, PAGE 43, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING INPINELLAS i COUNTY, FLORIDA. _ Ev aeumertlaryTazt?d.3 O _ THE PROPERTY IS NOT HOMESTEAD. ' I1ncrblz T PG 17 (1 TIC Karleen F er, Clerk, Pinellas coUf:ry and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, any. lawful claims o fall persons whomsoever. "Grantor" and-"Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. In Witness Whereof, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. MARKWEST, INC. a ORIGINAL RECEIVED Sheila V. Ramon, President 118 E. Jefferson Street Orlando. FL 37mi i 3 20 STATE OF FL , RIDA CO"L 'TY CiF -- C N?,NING DEFART.MENT OF CLEAR44> FER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before mt this Z71?,day of T?`f 1999 by Sheila V. Ramon, who is personally known to me or produced as identification and did not take an oath. My Commission Expires .i?? . NCIaSV P11'b11:C y m A. Bfa'.?'7 ER /? r?,??? p k-CMk11SS10N-s C:M1:, f- :t%C.1Ly'? Printed, typed or stamped name 7PA11R°A1s5T139285.1 196BA10M1 4;2695 L 55 111111111111311.911III 112H 211!!,! 1'I i1 This instrument w2s preZared by and return to: F ROBERT E. JOHNSON, ESQ. 6C226611 07-30-1999 i?:43:?r S5S DED-VESTCO, INC Broad and Cassel RECORDING 002 PAGES 1 $10.50 100 North Tampa Street DOC STANP - DR219 5 63.00 RECORD FEES Suite 3500 Tampa, Florida 3602 TOTAL: 41;.20 CASH AEti. TENDERED: 414.25 CHANGE: 4.05 Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification No: [Space Above This Line for Recording Datal W A R R A N T Y D E E D (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) 1999 BETWEEN VESTCO, LNC-, a Florida This Indenture made this 3? day of U - - rk corporation, whose post office address is 1920 9 Street North, St. Petersburg, of the County of State of FL 33704, Grantor, and MARY SALINAS, GLEN E. STILO, SARA PINELLAS , CUNl\'GHAM, CATHERLNE RTNDER and BEN SHAW and their successors as the TRUSTEES OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, a Florida corporation, whose post office address is 118 N. Ft. Harrison, Clearwater, FL 34615, State of FL, Grantee. Grantor purchased the below :described land as agent for the Grantee. Grantor's purchase was made with the intent to transfer the below described property to the Grantee and it was purchased exclusively with the Grantee's nmds. _ Grantor's funds were not used in the original purchase and no monetary consideration has passed between _ Grantor and Grantee pertaining to this instrument. pRD1NCi WITN°ESSETH, That said Grantor., for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/100'5 oc i ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, _the receipt whereof is hereby aclmowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and T Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land situate, lying and beingn PD- LLAS ?ES- ,iF _County, Florida, to-wit: Ev - See Schedule "A" Attached z p? THE PROPERTY IS NOT HOMESTEAD. and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. In Witness Whereof, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written- , ice: VESTCO, INC. erence J. McCarthy, President 225 3rd StreetNorth St. Petersburg, FL 33701 STATE OF FLORIDA COU-N7Y OF'Dw-,r-l'?,--S The fore oipg instrument was acl n . Zed before me this LS4-` day of t? 1 1999 by Terence J. McCarthy, w of is jersonally,Ltm to me or produced as identification J' dial not tax Ca!21 My C-0mmission Expires Public Tnc? Ttemino ORIGINAL My CJF9iUSS10WfCJJS140£RBE$ Printed, typed orstamped name RECEIVED Zr.,,-.a'` ecrsane?t;ttrnFUrr?t?tu?Z,nc KwJeen 'r De 3fac TPA' VLEAL SS-1"f92911?y 19684=1 7729199 3 0 2000 7G? PLANNING DEPARTMENT mmngi6ie-tx rd CITY OF CCEARWTFR r Fineila9 County Deputy Clerk Schedule "A" P ;Vii= L°S COUNTY FL5 - OFF.R-C.BK 10607 PG 1652 Parcel 1: 16/29/15/18648/012/0120 LOT 12, BLOCK 12, COURT SQUARE; ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 53, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Parcel 2: 15/29115/54450/012/0040 LOT 4, BLOCK 12, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO TEE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, SAID LAINTS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Parcel 3:16/29/15/18648/012/0110 LOT 11, BLOCK 12, COURT SQUARE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN TEE, OFFICE OF TEE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COLiNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 53, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 196b4MMI 7x181% ORIGINAL RECEIVED tr UG 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER _22;S7 JL (_. --- u = 607 PG~ i 530 5 S 19111[ I IIl 1III1'1I EI x11111111 al il111111 This instrument was prepared by and return to: 6226612 07-30-1999 15:46:04 SS5 ROBERT E. JOHNSON, ESQ. 01 0000000000 Broad and Cassel DRECORD INC RECORDING 002 PAGES 1 $10.50 100 North Tampa Street DOC STAMP - DR219 3 1.70 C Suite 3500 RECORD FEES 9 53.00 Tampa, Florida 33602 TOTAL: 114.20 CASH AMT. TENDERED: 5160 P CHECK AMT.TENDERED: $13.60 Property Appraiser's CHANGE; S,oo Parcel Identification No: [Space Above This Line for Recording Data] W A R R A N T Y D E E D (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) 1999 BETWEEN N=, INC., a Florida This Indenture made this ? day of corporation, whose post office address is 326 1" A enue North, St. Petersburg, of the County of PINELLAS, State of FL 33701, Grantor, and MARY .SALLNAS, GLEN E. STILO, SARA CUNN.INGHAK CATHERINE RINDER and BEN SHAW and their successors .as the TRUSTEES OF TEE 'CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, a Florida. corporation, whose post office address is I IS N. Ft. Harrison, Clearwater, FL 34615; State of FL, Grantee. Grantor purchased the below described land as agent for the Grantee. Grantor's purchase was made with the intent to ransfer the below described property to the Grantee and it was purchased exclusively with the Grantee's funds. Grantor's funds were not used in the original purchase and no monetary consideration has passed between Grantor and Grantee pertaining to this instrument. _ WITit'ESSETH, That said Grantor, for.and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 001100'S (S10..00) Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, _ the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and CRD1?G heirs and assigns forever, the following described land situate, lying and being in PLIN"ELLAS ZGrantee's County, Florida, to-wit: :Ec [ Dy ccumentary Pd, g )S -'-zf?_ See Attached Schedule "A" Irmncb!e Tax Pd -EFS Karleen F De' I cler rinatlas County \1TF THE PROPERTY IS NOT HOiVIESTE Deputy Clerk P/C ?- REV ---and said {cantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the T a? .;lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. `" ??{("?"Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. - In Wit4ess Whereof, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first ORIGINAL above written. RECEIVED Signed, seal e7ivered in ots presence: VJLE. INC. A US 3 V 2006 e }? PLANNING DEPARTMENT t r4A n r1 • o BY:,,`?- riTY OF CLEARWATER _ Terence J. McCarthy, President 225 3`d Street North nr?ri a-; P TD' •,J %r>= 1W tom, St. Petersburg, FL 33701 STATE OF FLORIDA COLsitU OF ?ine 11 as n, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ? day of 5t~1?11999 by Terence J. McCarthy, wh is personallw`kmown to ;.rte or produced as identification ? did not tale oath. .l Jz I . viy Commission Expires Notary Public- ' , 4l. ? c?{p?I R C?BtBt4'' r AIRES Printed, TVUed Or SIEMDed name 2. 2DO" PAI1RE ALE5fh79290. ; ? 968:.10001 7.2859 a r- Schedule "A" F. INrLLPS COUNTY r LF . Orr.. r.=L . SK 10507 ?G I SS7 Parcel 1: 16129/15/186,18/012/0090 LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK 12, COURT SQUARE, ACCORDING TO TEE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE LN TEE OFFICE. OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT UIZ AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; RECORDED L\ PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 53, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BED-;G SITUATE LN PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Parcel 2: 15/29/15/54450/012/0060 LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 12, MAGNOLLA PARK, ACCORDING TO TEF> PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN TEE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED I\ PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING LINT PrNELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Parcel 3:16/29115/18648/000/0140 EAST % OF LOT 13 AND ALL OF LOT 14, COURT SQUARE SUBI)BUSION, ACCORDING TO TEE PLAT THERECY ON FILE IN TEE OFFICE OF TEE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 53, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN PIN?TELLA.S COUNTY,, FLORIDA. Parcel 4:16/29/15/18648/000/0120 LOT 12.AND THE LVEST Y2 OF LOT 13, COURT SQUARE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY., FLORIDA RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 53, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN PI_N'ELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA Parcel 5: 16/29/ 15 / 18 648/000/011.0 LOT 11, .COURT SQUARE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF ONT FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 53, SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYrNG AND BEING IN PINTELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUS 3 0 2005 PLANNING DEPAI?Tiv,6W CITY OF CLEARWATER iNST u- ub ?__ 21, 1°?E 1:17?M This instrument was prepared by and return to: ROBERT E. JOHNSON, ESQ. Broad and Cassel 100 North Tampa Street Suite 3.500 I ampa, Fiorida 33602 Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Nos: 16/29/15/18645/012/0130 f i ?nnit v,;",5oloiwon,)n --Mentary Tax Pd. £ ?? Sn 'v Intangible. Tax Pd pp?? wen F ? +t'e?-F L_. Deputy Clerk R R A N T Y D E E D (STATUTORY FORM - SECTION 689.02, F.S.) This Indenture made this i st day ofDecepber, 1998 between THE AMERICAN NATIONAL. r- RED CROSS, organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, whose post office address is 430 1 7th Street. N.W. , of theX-)O?M of City nr Wp.,?hinoton, SW of Di St. Col . , Grantor, and the CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, whose post office address is 210 S. Ft. Harrison, #173, Clearwater, of the County of PDMLLAS, State of FL 33756, Grantee. WITNESSETI-L That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND 00/100's (S l 0.0Q Dollars and other good and valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land situate, lying and being in PINELLAS County, Florida, to-wit: a U1 LOTS 13 THROUGH 16, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 12, COURT SQUARE, xEC ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 53, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF MINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 1NT n_ES LOT 2, BLOCK 12, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT MIT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC t'tc - RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. D0 t TIIE PROPERTY IS NOT HOMESTEAD. TOTt and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and wiil•defend the same against the lawful claims ofall persons v,heigiseeN, claiming by, through or under the Grantor. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. !•) In Witness Whereof, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's band and seal the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: AMERICkN NATIONAL RED CROSS Print'Name: Yon-all d E- Mil 1 er PRINT N o D. Catitpbel l ITS: Vi L,,-i dent, finance r ORIGINAL Printed Name: 7rina R.. Wilkerson RECEIVED 91of r:, I,, /,+ P:'jG 3 4 2006 :, ti- .. , DEP itX?V XX, Di nt?; PLANNING ?1 urns FPr ?° ARTME Cry OF NT /TI to e, ing instrument wa`s,,acLno`xvJtdeed before me this Isday of 998 CLWw??TER by 25 r '^JA-,-UGC. of the MERJ.C',N R_D CROSS, who is personally, known to me or produced _ identification and did not take an oath- Ml y Commission x?ires ?? ' ? Lc? tf1 ?( N yP-Uolic Prnied, typed or stamped ?a ne PIN-L.LRB COUNTY FLR, OF .REC.SK 10345 PG 2407 9C520531 5SS 12-21-1996 12:55:52 01 DED-CHURCH Of SCIENTOLOGY RENRDIHG 1 $6.00 DOC STAMP - DR-219 .3 $6,050.00 TOTAL- 56,056.00 CHECK AMT.TEHDERED. i6, 056.00 CHANGE; S.00 [Space Above This Line for Recording Data] TPA I LREALESTW 191.1 7.668+10co" 11F'9f t L ?`?.fL - ?1 Ell AE [MIN 71" n -S_Dc7 RJS-23-20C l = i 7n;, FEUi"'; TT P NEL.1 CC- BK -1. 154s, =3 i itill?i ?E 111?I1t?t?fl ?11?1` llll fill ? L. t? i3t7?1; ?: ? j r?.? ?? ? ?(iCi' ?:::? 7 V ACCT? y -- -- J TBTPL• S3 i?Jb_Ru ?teear r[t_ o lea vaa e-. Inc, LO L'i nn w, _ `12 90 :curt Sree? 70 Clearwate'e7' 1--, DL r?lje fin. !`JiT P ~ SPECIAL WARRAN7Y DEED Made this .2l,?r_ .gay of -? 200 1 by the CM Y OF CLEARWA - F. ORIDA, a Municipal,•Conoraeon the'Stite of;-Florida hereinafter called ttae. °C-rant:e, ^ TOM ;) 4G fk: s i 'DEVOGi T, AS TRUSTEE OF T'HE CHURCH. Or SMEN LOLOGY RELIGIOUS.TRUS-T, wit: r full pdvu 'ins autna-m- to prmtect conserve, sell, :!.ease, en=n73:er or-'otherwise manage and dispose oz the real property; whose Post OrTic;e address la ;3I S; South Garden vem Lie, C eairwater , y-.iorida '33 / 3S, 136r°iri2 NZ•rere,mr -u< hmemt*m 1w= . n a.2-_? rL a3 _he p&MbsJc t m5 ir''-tmen:arm! kw Aeh, 62W rrrewntdv" rb -nz a kic mccu a e L4-s:, s .z e.4 =s :a d expxax,.wi. 'ArItnessefh, that the arantor, for and. ir, ?^cnsio-:?_raiion di $10:00 and other valuable considei-abons, receipt -vherecf is hereby acknowle gec, ;sere y,gmnts, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, cow vs an ^anf ms Lmto she ?.rarr?_, all of tl-ul?.jbltou%-,g.pa- e's d, real propei?y sitL:aie in Pinellas County, Florid?_ :gym Lot 8, 3Iz>ck 1? ittfA-I?}OLi ' PAS UBDIV.ISION, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 ofi"?e P>;ibiic Records of Pinel.a_s t?uftty,_ lorida, AND- - A poiton of Sec iov--.tS,. osai s ip 2A South. Range 13 cast, more particularly describedlas - follows. I _ From the intersecgon > the North fight-of-way of Court Street and the East right-o?-: rMy. of South Gardea:-X-Ve. iue, rirn East 140 -feet for a Point ?df =Beginning, thence Northeaster1YVWD feet: `thence Est-15S feet along Franklin Street; then >r>r Southwesterly 3DO feet thence west 3 feet aloria s?uriStreetto the Point-of Beginning I :0.9_E+ :` net eris; hereditamerits and appurtenances them ,belong'inn--or in--anywise, appertaining.;; To Have and i6, Id, 't ie same in 'fe'e simple forever. Subto ?v<oe%iqueni adalorernxes,and current.ins'.t rents flfi special asszssmen not vet due and LavaotR t hiQi?ways igrts-cT wa ; hoerses, sesem?s any; re..str'i?ons c; record aeneraliy, zohine j - o. dis^tanc?s.?,? other geuemmenfa! imitations, I Aid file said Grantor does specifi=lly want the fibe to said land and wlli defend the same against the !aw l .ciatre - alL pers'ris Eat ii3e by; ui ugh or mnaer Gmm:ir except taxes libr. 'the year 2001 and. suosepisent, and s::ibje-t io'the ma:t_-rs .hQ7;e7inabove mentioned. Pace! N-umbe--s: 0? ANAL ReCEIVED A'JU 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C1TY Oh CLE • - s: G? I-firv:l+,?i'. .,J r•r_.Y..?i._I:? ?i.z7?$I P ?' NST n ^-- C - - T i y ED ^ - • ? ate tnrl7 . to k E Sa . Rcb+ert F ..ehnsan, Esq. - ?_. Johnson. Qhisfln . x .3416 _ P.Q., BIP pampa, Florida 33601 i This instrument prepared by= - - - -- - . _-, -- _ . 3oiznson ,36.E ?- - - ?` - • i . ;? Bnx Tampa F.1 or da 336 D 1 ` .,., ? L,; _ 3 ser' s p 0 ? fl l :?'. r.? r T Rrc3p'-P a 8• -- fir ! 29 I.? 8 .. Q - S-CI'?'Itt1- ' • , G2 STIt 2 /? ' 1. 1993, Mado this day of der taT Z - ENT PRE , "- sting under een T. J , gp INGS , INC.- , a r f ors da cargoration having i ts principa3 place 'ol 3?the 3_aws-of 'the State of ^lozida, whose pest office address is and la'w-f-ally' bus iness in the County of Fine3las , Fllor da 3.31331 _ Past Cff1-ce Box 325 r St. petersb-dr au thor-ize.d to -transact hn.s-iness in ' the State, of Florida pS E:,. = S JONATEMN- 'I _rgater._caied. the Grantr3 and KAREN Sri JANET RFi G.?, their succes.s or or s uc s sors s' :t s Post $C-ffi- 71 f ce - i,IGIt?t1S . TKUST, . whose . THE Ch*URCH OF SC"IF NTOZr 3G Sui to 12 00 , Lo s gel-es r address ss 6-331 . Ho l3 od Ban-levard , California 90,C)28,- hareina£ter- called the Grant"-"-: r -. T Of the _ ?TLTN SS T = That the Grantor?. for .and.in r.si?zs?de?atl , _... 't r f Ten :I oliars. and othes .good azad..- 7-- x S,thete.01 is he y -sum o- - the re.c _ p if 3n hand :paid by. Gsante ;. ?I1sg :"?onve s; r 5e , azi ac3mo legged, .. hereby' g'rAnts , barga ??s ? s LS.-S-0=S, azsd cans fern uzsto Graneer 3S iC ?ant certrn ..nd state asz 1 to-, lt F l? da ; - rt2ieriy" feet i-`.. - _ 'end3s J4 3C??Td1ut3 SI7BIIZISIOI?, Lot- 9 I... OURTI SQTJ -Br?o?cmap alice?trrds ?f _13 as the _ t ''? Cu?zty, _3caa - eats heredttamen- - s ahe xz1th " a? 3. the ynem , rt.n_- T{}fiETZ any apt Qan?es thereto . be3ongiaa o_ ?n .. the same "iii 'ree . f.crever , .. TC? aA ATD ?3 £tt3, :..... ORIGINAL. RECPVED Yjr 30 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Rs F - Dpi C0 OF CL°,ARWA3"Efl _ ?,ECCRD EIR e ?F? S' _ ?L <<iOi.YTY_.: r IAA - - - 370 i tBe fie ;?r?ntDr does hereby' wily ?:a-Trait . ti ?? e= : to :said AND -and will defend the seine a9ai - t the ikw=ui oiaiazs of all iand•? _ - " ?ZIS iwT?I?3t 1?e ?'? excevt: tSXe& sI1?358C Slent tD j?BCeffibe 33.r 19 1, - pers '- zoziin ?dinances and other restrictions $r?d- rohibitio:i impasad g. a- _ y_ lirr..' ie:g eriuae tal authorities; and Conditi-onsr easesaeRLs, PP,,... - . with tYie widers tandui9 th g t:_ a- anc -. restrictions. o.:' ecb..td. if any, with. this reference. - s hail rio t operate to- re impose _ any a them i13 .rawer and authority is gra*_:t.?d to C ar?ee; To =rave, tige-, Protect, subdivide and re=subdivide _ -- T _ the ra:l estates:. o, :0uy tomart thereof streets; Psighways or alleys!, and to. Z To ded-rate parks , - vacate any subdivision or part thereof;` _ s -3 To contract to 'S or exchange; togrant cp`.ion to - gi rc lase .: to. _' e21. an ta_-=S- and. to convey. _ eixher xith . flr without consideration, 4.- To convey the real estate or any 'P art thereof to 'a successor or success'o=s 5I2Cce5 Or. i ri trust.; and to gr3ST oars and authorit-ies vested .in trust ail of ?e tithe,, estate, powers and In Grante_ e ; - 5. To donate, to..dedicate.,, to mortgage ar otherwisia enc-amber the real estate or any part ; th-eeof --=?;--To .Isa?,e the real estate ` or aaLny part ther o ;.;. ter nds a= r revers ion., on a-hy a for Day pe PC! ri _ s. ms and for ser s of t... r and to r:enew or je:xteyid leases an any sash'. peri _ change o modify .any. ?' od or riot ;s o- time, .aud to amend, - leass and .the'- ez s and nrov sLa s thereof ; --t tO'qr'ant raft to make 3eases and _To COn to a Se the t whale or -- and :oiav: xo...ren _iease? and opl_ _? thearxr:.=' ;aj rt of -t3?s =eve_ q=6- to contrasts t a= f rXig tie ^ amaunt o went cry f utu= { - - - o ecedute -3$ts Qfesmnts or: carp of a kinds. - .. r .gn any =xq fat1 or interest . :. Ta dea l cdnarey out oz ease heist agg?rtera ? to the sea3 estates n ?n Pa 3--n m or.Y - - ? t??reo:? -silo, - . _ - •--- - - _ -_ `?- • 3?. '? dQa3 ?-z? a trt3e_- t? t?? 'e?" ? e?tato ?i3 ??-erg' ._ - ._ _ F x.._ rn any wad andr<_uch ` czsiderat?oxs aulc be Ias?f?zl reof r . A a meson 01%171 g ..the titl;'ie to t°lke real es tats e to 'e 1 h ift, - hez s:i?s3a` ;"dBTeTit ; firm the_ wy eve gcifed - ° a de.3.3??c?g __ ?zth ?tantee-; ?n .re3aticn - =:n no. casehl :ate p t thereof- af or'' _ the real eytate or t? mom the real es T _ - . : - - ORIGINAL .. RECEIVED r - AUG 3-0 2006 PLANNING ut FF<' iENT 1 CITY OF C I.EARW TER d } f _ F INEL,I.,; `. C.OUNTU . FLA. OF . F?E:":,$K 3?7PG. .373 INST 2 9:-140iio MAY 17 a :1993 1-2 _ 3 PN -- wARRA34!rY DEED yr? I&zert E. J.0hTIS10-n, Esc-" bnX 3 5 '-f- rle?da 33fiDI ?? Tam- d by : _ ? _-•; _ .L t ; - x are "his=:hstr?ent "prep ;M - ? - - -- -- - ' - . ` srt .E. ohnsan, Esq. ~ .JL_-- =}: _ -Q Rob Box _ Prape?'isr' s Parcel . L r: y IdentificationTiaber.'612_9L,15/185.4$ttiQD?Dff9=D `• ?`r?*rLe r 5 S_ S_ _ f. nod -,th .s day of ? T is ? . 1993, betr,?effi T.fT=I . OLD13 S, ;rte a F1:o=ida cerpara o ex?stl?g uia the laws of tire.. Stafe klazlda, having its priAczgal..:glacs< flf. _ in the ;amount` ? o :Pizfeinas, whose post off ^e address. Is' ns Offioe Eox 3 S Wit.: pete3:s r Flar3da 3373 a sd. lew ?yV.: _ .au-t2sari?e?3 to sic bas iness'? 1n tie 'State - c ?r "=. - - 3xerei aft r called rant'az•, and, KAREN EVA.SS t JONATHAN EPS?€ ?T ." ?NGs Su essor-?r-scoessrs as s,.eesxr - z'tC t ? fiTTDZ?OG RELIG17DUS TRUST, whose:; pc?s?? ?f?z? ` t _ . K' ess s 33 kI21 3's od Boulevard, 53 to 12 ffU t Zoos lffiqe1ds al fdrn a S# 32 , hE?reinaiter called the G-r=tee. WITMESSE3 za_. 'hat t1e Grant=,, €d2 and in cons-'•e=aficr- `0 tb e iE sum :a€QZ? $03:1as and ether good amd araliab3e coidrazions to 3t In ha i?3 t?21, d by ,C'r=371tale the receipt ?}sere?f is hereby ' :ac sr3 edges ,? eby g-.ants.r bargains' sel?? s t ecn?gs_r. reassses,: . t i sfers =to t$e Grante , its s Ices lars rF• s --and _ `ass, gr?s ?"ewe that certain 3 d: s tuatee iih 1sss??T?s.. Douuat?, . ?Lats end I D ,, TzSS tae '-Nerth feet ,--K= COURT 1?S_U&R ?` UB IVSL-?N= "aocord g? fl m z . .. L - _ . plat tiese f as recorded • Mat Boole "S, Rage,. V, 5.3, o? the l:c Recnrd? of I?neas ' .. ? DrTt?a. - .. -?;OGE$ER ritti al3 the nemnts hereri?taai?nts and .T p enzsnces t eretc. belongiTLg nr . in aZ3y ?z s e ` apgert a wing . • 0 .. P iN y LAS COUNTY F ILA . OF7. R -BY 82 74 PG' -iS7,4 " - AND the Grantor does hereby fn? lv wa-.nt the title ? saki:,.. h: - All - "land, and will defend the same aaai.nst th4_ law 1 claims a& persons whomsoever, except.- taxes subseques;';tc December 31, 199Z;: ' s a &-.Prohihit.ion imposed zaTiiaq ordinances and other restriction gpplic$bie goQQrnmental authorities..-anti grid Lions, easetneIt bY . and restscti-ons cf record, if any, a? h the understanding t:h? _ them- tams reference shall riot operate to ;Ceimpbse any of Full,power and aiifi.+Iority is gran?s?i etc; Gan,:.ee ` .? : te . :_ 1. To imo=ove;F_manage, protett z suDdivic3e and re-subdiu.de - r real estate or and; part thezedt?; ^ 2_ 'o de3icat ;'par3cs,. sti?efis, highways or alleys, ans# to eof; hei vacate any'subdiv1sidFd or part=,t 3 TO contract to sell or exchamge,, to grant, Ogt a to - guzchase, to sell ai ? any ..terms; and to zconveg ezther wz i '` - - , . I wxtt?zrt : amiss i-der?tio-s?-- '- ` • - _ 4 to convey Faal•,: estate or any part " therea£ z a , ` ~successor in '?st, a-tzx mat ? such.. successor or sdrs sted ' e , . . . s ve a11 ,af the title; ;state, powf rs"and author?t- in Est l isr Grantee 5 To Jana tom, t? eaicat.e, to mortgage- or othes?se encumber is ttie' real estate or and paTt thereof, , the real estate or any part thereof 6 . = '20 1ss. ? _ possess an or < e`ve$,s? on, on a-Ay terms and for ?Y pera.od,, or d #t?r rm s an leases .an any te pew-rods =oft # o renew or extend me such a, . ate: periodF a= p .?of time., and to amend, change or . ? r asses and tire. ti=ms and provisions hereof; _ ' MM options. t0, lease ses and to. l k - ` - g ea e 3 ?S'lIItS$ct to ma 7. :? =- . znd nptsarrs to renew leases and options to purchase the whale as V i ang part •. ? ? re vers ion, and to contract. respecting the manner -- o= fixi3%g't3ze amount of present or future . rentals; `?`o execute grants of easemen?_- or- harges sf• y d " _ - _ - - releaseconvey or assign any ?gh't, title or intexe .. ?: in ?a_ *Lbout or eeseme*zt appu=te ant. to the real -estate or any parf_. a:r To deal vatt 6 tit3. to the real .estate and ever' awfm?' would be 3 i . ons as slay amd.far such considerat ite o? :'t an th ?t:? ; l d - _ OR'dI . _ w= ea to to ft Y gesso owaaiag. the title ta. the real. es _ NA? .: if _ect - -Whe'tiher : szs3ai tar to .at fferen:t frnm. the ways above spec ECEIIFED f in ,Tiio..? case sfhall Naay party dealing with- Grantee 1'e- rel a`xfln tate os any part t7ze f l e h ho - ^ 0 2006 s e .ga m t to the =e 3 estate o??d w - F v+ Z NING' D - _Y"rw- Fh - Y-1 C [,r?Sj9?411yE . ?A1 ? 6/I"` CL 9?i`i ^??R :;; - , _ _ - - _ - - .. - ..-•__?_ _. LCe+.?r i vim' ?- - - PINELLAS COUNTY ?A _ 75 _ aK SZ74 - cnntr$ced to be sold, leased or mot`, gaged by af any purchase' money-'. , i^atin th e a= ; Grantee. be obliges to see to { b= l - .,a e, - es rent or. money boaas.?ed or 'advanced on_-, rea f the tzu hiVe been comnl4 -d rs as cr ab3ige3 to see that the te r e,.eiencv of au _ inter tare aQCes$ i ? rs r be c3 ig?ed to i7nsu act -f the Grantee. c77 he..ob-1 iged or pr=Q- eged to inQt?ise irfto a ? tast • . d : , the ..y.?- ? + ,..} :?,? dee T A. 6f the ?' +s C f, . ht -: t_-apt -8?- ylT.,... #:e?i". in re1:¢.a. } ?+..:' ent ex. d l Qil a. i t - =s rum i0?? 7- r lease cr ot2 er hal' l be cer=3.mtj,e,y dence in favor Of . evf y- '.: ' - e5 3tE s t C the read g rsa c?r'o1iYn„ng uuci ?:? ucIi conueyazice, Sease'ar. thereof pe=son e . I a _ iivery ; of d o t.be &; ,Iier exM Safi, , :what -and- by the st agreement was izz full fcxcs reated -here-in ' 's t - : c b mat sucn asr A or Sher insteat ms iii efeC? r ?' zecn t d, -sn aaco'rda i e V6-?t-,h t-he t , -e.?=?ns and. i im tatf ??s • - e and =in the agzeemerit or is the.:a cazstaned:r¢,•¢;= ee fc) that Gran ll b6he#zr ,-TPS _ s J _ tFie=eb,Viand birrd? on a • a=- =ed aad =yen =me-red to execute and deliver eve=75 alyt ds d - u . . y . her instrument aa trust deed, leasd:ritgge at hat- deed is true: ;t , se'; saics es?n? err successars tae eouszance Is -tp been properly ?pp°'. t have X t - . siicessor .or suceessa:?s =L?s rSGhts'.s - nr^er d as- e ?.1I3r , stn. his' "$`nrba?t_es,: daties•= -, a?i?r}a..orzs - ?_ t .. _ i.r, i ast _ - deee ?xndr or has executed thzs nt G , di v 7 -_ ._ ra - e SriwTg2E5S L3 s°eal or ..tithe date &•Eo 9?5d"d • = +` - _ i?era-vexed in ?? : ? •:.. ; r :j' `?E i 3 8 'i=ed SESled aad Y ' r y a_ e gzeseace of".: INGS Tom,` x-. r 6 _j RK . Xf Irv- 7.7 L e.. Ritness presi-den''t t . i tta? P i fox 323 a St.. petersburg, FL -_? ti " ` '- - :ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2006 ice QXPART f)F CLEARWAT _ .-._u ? ^S'.-rte L'4i3Id E3z PiNELT`a '`• ? jig - ? aa3aIedged before sae s gn-i irs'aeai was 15CARTHY, IIi2$??E € T Ie a by $,zljL'? as -day of ' r r Fiaa ida ca gosati a:i, am be tine •rodth T. J _IS HQ?,DI?SiGS, _i3C . , and did take corpoxatsc He is pe-sona?1 3czs ,, " - - ^' - r ?- pTUi• R. lWCCO? -P? Usti- ' `? CC..3f, ]494 F.-'• r'c » stn` R 'All m -: _ q $ MIA ml, I ?j, .'{ - rte, a,`?8'e4?. - "`?rl ? '? .,fF Vi a.u?^?•. _ ?1'.• i. ?r MMx^K'A'.K Ya'Y°•+?„?i. rii•?,.. ? . .`'\ y?:' ' :fit - - .-4' ` -_ - ICEI>,' ??LANNiNC4-' € TMENT -- - - :: - - _ CITY CAF CLl,?,TER _ . J. ,?. Dnvl!; 8 2 r? J - -L... _..... .._.... ._.... _.. .. _ 3 nd --j4 20 9 22 0 1? z, 5 r h 3 ..v 10 21 PARK --- CITY HALL l --- 20 1 b 87 12 19 _ 0 2 107 13 18 ,10 tx 3 5 5 14 17 M 2Ri.8-49? _ _ 119 15 16 4 0 _ STREET sa 70 I01I-ln5 200 a 13/06 V) I P M ' 3/081 A ? 13/01 210 COVE CONDO. 210 i 102- 92 , 22. 2.26 d s5 306 0 228 1 3/10 3 713/04 13/t I h ?c 13/03 13/02 j 'i Q I 31 300 a - 3 n2.-. Q 2 ` 65 1 1 COURT- o STR a'i1?r?xau ._ 196J-sal 50 v? y WR 7, p ER Fl r ST .72, _ ' u , 2- ....... __ 1 2 1 3 1 -..VAC.-1206. 5i6._.__..____ _.__„ Jd00- I .S/I Y 1 1 a9a 1 400 0 2 04) 1 L ... __ ... .............__. 411-97 3 416 4 "1 cy) c? tx.1 3 I'l S0 _ ..._._.__._. 1 4 4 422 U) ............ . . PIERCE sa17-el o 9 107 FRANKLIN of 40 39 96 41 38 f 42 37 T 36 44 35 n 4867- 1+7a Q 351 1599-299 ? _46 MARKLEY ST 47 F I,5 48 co 49 50 51 100 d t ? ?? 0 t m w °j . _ - o 15 16 9 5 e o _ 53 to t 2 ^ 6 7 s 13 „.STREET ?, 3 I ,t 5 2 ? -F 9 18 I C. III STREET v 2 3 t 5 8 6 F >_ r s 9 _ a '09/2005 25:30 72744! CL=PK ? at D2 _ • PAGE 05 crHis = ???.? L east Dasc?tvtion F :NCL.LPS .,_OUNTY fLP, DFf RE.L:5K -1774E P3 597 AteBS proposed ZD be Y3C8ted: . (1) 7S-foot wide ;W 'y shown on plat ot.COUR7 SQUARE, fiocetsd not#iteriy of Lots n through 16, Block 12, COURT SQUARE, according to the Plat th reof recorded in Piat$ook 5. Page 53, Public Records of Pinellas County, (2) 13-'foot wide alley shown on plat Hof as ? T. S; =A aRF, t lomtted recorded ion Pala 71 through 114, 'COURT SQUARE, Book 5, -Page 33, Public Records of'Plneftas County, 'Fiords. l3 fH=foot wide-alley Chown :on ;piat df COURT SQUARE, located westerly of Lots 1 through ;5 and =easterly of Lots 16 through 10, COURT `SQLJARE. acconiin to pat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 53, Putific Record's of Pinellas r, Florida. (4) R-fight-ol-way,easemant -in favor of City. ,of Clearwater, granted in C_R. Sook 5223. Page 140, Pvhft Records of -Pinei has County, Florida, over the following pr Front the Northwedt cornsr of Lot 15,'BfoCk 12, Court Square, a5 recorded in ptsot Book 5, Rage S3„ -oflhe Pubbc Records 'df.Pinallas'County, Florida.. for e point begtrrning; thence Easterly slang the North line .of said Lot 16, IZO feet to a 9644, :said pout :being P.olrlt A for Warence; thence return to the P._O.B ; thence Southwesterly along the ''West line :of said List 16; 4.0 Meet; `;hence Northessiaely to Pcii 't.A• 3-?o0lt.utility easement in favor :nf city of Clearwater, granted tsy resolution in O.R. (5? of the Public:Records of Pinellas -L6unty, Florida, over pool; rt t adj Page acent 20 '!o 2, `Stock 12, :nltagnolia Park Subdivision, Which is more y a ` ppopg particularly described 'as oilou?s: Begin -e the North wavt :corner .of Lot 1, SIDck 12. Magnolis Park Subdivision `as recorded in Plat :Bodic 1, Page 7. 01, 'ollhe Public Records of'Fiillaborougt 0.0wity. Flofda, df;which ',Pinetles -CouTity waslomwrly a ,part,'lhence run 5outhwestcrly along the W' 'ast;line .of :said Block 11. and Tits -southerly -extension to :the Narthwest carr?tr'df'Lat i6.B ?oP b 2, Coutt'squam 5, Records h ncensnlDWeSbelrrelya or,9nthe -Weste y l?a.9e `53. a1` axtettstort z?F:the Norttlline :pf ssid !.Lot IS, Block 12, :Ctiuct :Square SubdlvIsion, to Lot a-.point W A line 3 ?0 1eet NVest aT :antl .parallel to .the 'West :fine of `sari d fine tol?hc j:_ N??nolia :Park Subdlv'•sion; `thenba run `Norlhcssterly along SoUlh ;H1ght of-1way :fine of Frank'lln .Street, thence run Samfiy akmp -said South g rp7-vaay'.l'me'to the Rotnt cf Seginriigg. ;:C':st 1z 21 81 ORIGINAL RECEIVED pjG 3 0 2606 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAT": 0 47074 DEL-21-200i S ORO:INANCE NO, 6839-01 P INELLRS D0 SK 117,4-6 PG ?-f-E= iWaa(t11111tIfi:lllll?ItllU?ilatllllilllL':(11(111 G7Rm sq5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, - FLORIDA; VACATING THE 15=FOOT ALLEY LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINES OF LOTS 6 THROUGH 10, OF COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION; THE 15-FOOT ALLEY LYING ADJACENT TO THE NORTH PROPERTY LINES OF LOTS 11 THROUGH 14, OF SAID COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION; THE 15-FOOT ALLEY LYING ADJACENT TO THE NORTH PROPERTY LINES OF LOTS 9 THROUGH 16,. BLOCK 12, OF SAID COURT - SQUARE SUBDIVISION; VACATING THE 3-FOOT UTILITY u EASEMENT LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE WEST 2 PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 1, -BLOCK 12, OF MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING THAT PORTION OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT WHICH EXTENDS SOUTH TO Tk-II= NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16, BLOCK 1;2, OF SAID COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION.; AND VACATING THE . TRIANGULAR RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST. CORNER OF LOT 16, BLOCK 12, OF _ SAID COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.. WHEREAS, Church of Scientology Religious Trust, owner of real property adjoining the alleys described herein, has requested that the City vacate the alleys, utility easement and right-of-way easement depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto; and V`IHEREAS, the City Commission finds that said alleys, utility easement and right- of-way way are not necessary for municipal use and it is deemed to be to the best interest of the City .and the general public that the same be vacated; now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA: RECEIVED sYro' 30 2005 - Section 1_ The following: PLANNING DEPARTMENT see Exhibit "A" Legal Description, attached hereto CITY OF CLEARWATER is hereby vacated, closed and released, and the City, of Clearwater releases all of its right, title and interest thereto. Section 2. The City Clerk shall record this ordinance in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; following -adoption. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect fthmediately upon adoptian. P9c z 20? _ro 31 1 Ordinance No. 6889-01 I P INE:LLRS C UivTY } LP , .'.. QF r . R=C . SK 1 1 746 PG 596 1 i' PASSED ON FIRST READING November 15, 2001 PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED nPr PTnhPr , ??01 I hereby cerzzi y that tl:;.s is a trac n:d correct cony of 1x. origiul as it zppcars in the iilles of the C:ty Gi +-.iean amr. C Wi ness ny hard sad official seal of the i or Clear,?2ter. This :.Jf, dzy of a b=^? > 20 Brian J. Aung Deputy City?e k Mayor-Commissioner Approved as to form: Attest: nne C. Hayman Cynt :ia . Goudeau ? `Assistant City Attorney City. Cierk ? i ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPA.W!rvl?.NT CITY OF CLEARk.WAi'rk ' i 2 Ordinance, No. 68: ?-G 1 I ' I - --- F__ . _* _ _ RECEIVED ?:oo 3 0 2006 - ' EXHIBIT "A"" P ( LANNING DEPARlr,i-NT - CITY OF CLEARWATER r .Sccle 1" = 700' P INELLP,S COUNTY ELR Its is not a survey . DEE PEE BK ? 1746 PG 5ss Z ?J Li Z 0 7 r 14 13 9 - 12 11 .. ? 15 15` 10 J FR ANKLIN Easement Locations r. - Regyested g pl Cann t STREET - 3, - 5 6 7 8 z. 1 2 3 4 LLJ. Li 10 14! 7 _ CD 14 13 12 11, (! - 11 12 14 16;v ?-- . 10 9 Q X. E - Alleyway Vacchf qs - COUR T STREET Requested sy Appl can t 5 6 z 15 16 718 2 7 8 9 2 1 g \ E_ITY of CLEAR WATER2 FLORIDA F lUEIUC W R O KS ADMINISTRATION 24 C) T-- ? t+LLFY4VAY5 do FASEAAEN75 v?c2om-?:> 18 1 7 16 1 5 VACA 17:ON •REOUEST 2 DF , 2 r? ? C 1 b wa CHURCH Or SaENTOLOGY ?-? oz/salzom : RELIMUS TRUST as-zas-rse' a7 Omaw¢ .2859 6956-.U2 TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS RECEIVING SITE SURVEY AND DEED ORIGINAL RECEIVED k,UGj 3 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r r a. r 4GI710 12-13-20tt1 'Ir :37:49 tfDl; ? ? 51. a a PI s IIIGlQ s D` idRIT( M DEW U31414 - d 1#:0143M? RK:11731 SPG:0774 EPG:0776 REORDIIIS 005 PAF-S 1 $c"4.? DA" STAMP - DR219 3 $351000.00 RaR`D FEES 9 $2.00 ? ?acrs .5-acct 35 026 OD , ?rrc TOTAL:' cx ar r _ DECK Alf 1. TEED: t35, 02b.00 Thi3 insIIvrrieni was prepared byDSE? C r - DEAD CLERK DR219 Di' and return to: DS _ Amber F. Williams, Esquire INT _ 3ohnsnn Blakely; Pope, Bbkor, FEES._ D 1-437217 -DEC-13-200 1 4 i38pn MiF - P INELLRS CO 9K 1 1731 PG 774 Ruppel & Burns P -A. NO IM IIIII IIIIIIItIIIIItI[I Itll IItlII11IIIII P .o: Box_1368 Ri V - 'Clearwater, FL. 33757-1368... ?r7i ..: D? fD`v1' WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE made,th.:is '`,1, day of_a: December,=2001; between BEF, INC., a Florida not-for-profrt:coipo-Ji. on, successor by merger with THE OAKS OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Flofida-,tiot4or-profit corporation, as to-Parcel1 and BEF, INC., a Florida not-for-pro t. corporation FIKIA BAPTIST ESTATES OF FLORIDA, INC. FIK/A THE AMERI CAId BOTIST ESTATES OF CLEARWATER, INC., as to Parcel 2 ("Grantor"), whose...dress is: 420 Bay Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756, h and TOM DEVOCHT, •as•:T- xustee of the CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, with full poweF *and',authority either to protect, conserve and-to-sell, or to lease, or to encumber, or othtrwtse,-to manage and dispose of the real property described in the recorded instrument ("Grantee"), whose address is: 319 South, Garden Avenue, Clearwater, Florid WITNESSETH: _ That the-Gr'anfor, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, to Grantor in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowl?dgod, has granted, bargained, sold, aliened, remised, released, conveyed and confirmed.',_.., and,-by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey arid. cor'ifirm unto the Grantee, and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever., aII`-Qf Grantor's interest in that certain parcel of land lying and being in the County o Pinellas, State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: Parcel -I Unit 1, OAK COVE, A CONDOMINIUM, according to the plat thereof recorded -ire Condominium Plat Book 102, pages 92 through 95 inclusive, and being further described in that certain Declaration of Condominium recorded in Official Record Book 6966, page(s) 1889, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together v G(NAL RECEIVED TO' 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT` CITY OF CLEARWATER Tax Identification Number-df. Gt", e; TOGETHER WITH 4#1 Ahe tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, with . . every privilege, right;. titi•6',•4'nterest and estate, dower and right of dower, reversion, remainder and easerri6ht thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVEA-Npf ZO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. ' And the` Gfantor'does covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the premises; :that.the premises are free of all encumbrances, except as set forth on Exhibit . "A":'-aitaciecF' hereto and triade a part` hereof; none of which shall be reimposed IeeeEiy, and that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell the same; and =that Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said lands, and will defend the same agair}st'the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. ORIGINAL RECEIVED Z00? AU S3 30 PLANNING DEPARYMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 2 t-rint name `.. BEF, INC., F/K/A BAPTIST ESTATES OF FLORIDA, INC. F/k/A THE AMERICAN BAPTIST ESTATES OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida not-for- proftt rporation Pri t 'Na olm Taaffe [ts: Vice Pr ident ORIGINAL RECEIVED A US 3 0 200u^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3 4 AYS0, 3 0 202;3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLIARWMER now PINELLRS COUNTY FLA . OFF. REC . BK 11731 PO 778 1. Taxes for the year 2001 and all subsequentyears. 2. Terms, conditions and provisions;-c6ntained in the Declaration of Condominium of OAK COVE. recorded in. O.R. Book 6966,. page 1889: together vrith such additions aril amendments to sand _ Declarafion,_ arid Coniiominium Plat as: from time to-tinle may be made, of the Public Records" of Pinellas :county, Florida: ` -, 3. Error on `Recorded Plat -as. re orded in O.R. Book 7131, page 1089, Public Records of Pinellas County,. Fiar'ida. -4: Service and Right-oaf. EntrK-.-" greement to Vision Cable of Pinellas, Inc. as recorded in O.R. Bwok a D306, page 1498, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. - 5. Easement in favor ?of ' Florida Power Corporation set forth in instrument recorded in &.R .,Book 4249, page 1987, Public Records of Pinellas County, _. .... = . Florida. Utility Easernant `in favor of the City of Clearwater set forth ininstrument record08;4n...O. Book 11604, Page 1717, Public Records of Pinellas County, - Florida. ORIGINAL RECEIVED A US 3 0 ZO16 PLANNING DEPART MENT CITY OF CLEARWATF.R 5 1 s. ?FST FL 2379 Broad Streeooksville, Florida 34604-6899 w SouthwAt Florida c Water Management DZStT1Ct (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) "'"tea M£?` On the Internet at. WaterMatters.org An Equal tampa Service Office Bartow Service Office Sarasota Service Office Lecanto Service Office Opportunity Employer 7601 Highway 301 North 170 Century . Boulevard 6750 Fruitville Road - 3600 West Sovereign Path Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 Sarasota, Florida 34240-9711 Suite 226 (813) 985-7481 or (863) 534-1448 or (941) 377-3722 or Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) 1-800.492-7862 (FL only) 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) (352).527-8131 SUNCOM 578-2070 SUNCOM 572-6200 SUNCOM 531-6900 SUNCOM 667-3271 Ronnie E. Duncan September 17, 2002 Chair, Pinellas Thomas G. Dabney, it Vice Chair, Sarasota Heidi B. McCrea Bob Wright Secretary, Hillsborough Church of Scientology Religious Trust Watson L. Haynes, 11 Treasurer, Pinellas 319 South Garden Avenue Edward W..chance Clearwater, FL 33756 Manatee .Monroe "Al" Coogier Subject: Notice of Final Agency Action for Approval Citrus ERP Standard General for Minor Systems Maggie H. Dominguez Permit No: 46024044.000 Hillsborough orough , Project Name: Oak Cove Renovation Pamela Hi Fentress Highlands County: Pinellas Ronald C. Johnson Sec/Twp/Rge: 16/29S/1 5E Polk Janet D. Kovach Dear Mr. Wright: Hillsborough John K. Renke, III This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action for approval of the permit application Pasco o referenced above. Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being received by the District within the time frames described below. E. D. "Sonny" Vergara Executive Director You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding Gene A. Heath a permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and Assistant Executive Director i i Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), of the Uniform Rules 120.57 and Chapter 28-106 F.S. lliam S. B ieaky W General. Counsel , , , of Procedure.. A request for hearing must- (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state all material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter28-106, F.A.C.. Copies of Sections 28-1.06.201 and 28-106.301, F.A.C. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request. a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. Enclosed is. a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule 40D-1.1010, F.A.C., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests may be affected by the District's action in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use. The enclosed approved construction plans are part of the permit, and construction must be in accordance with these plans. , ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4,UG 3 0 2006 Protecting Your PLANNING DEi-F-, oil, v Water Resources CITY OF CLEAR-VVATlr, 1 Church of'Scientology Religious Trust Page 2 September 17, 2002 If you have questions, concerning the permit, please contact Richard M. Alt, P.E., at the Tampa Service Office, extension 2045. For assistance with environmental concerns, please contact Todd W. Hershfeld, extension 2047. Sincerely, Alba E. Mas, P.E., Director. Tampa Regulation Department AEM:elb Enclosures: Approved Permit w/Conditions Attached Approved Construction Drawings Statement of Completion y Notice of Authorization to Commence Construction. Noticing Packet (42.00-039) Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301; F.A.C. cc/enc: File of Record 46024044.000 Kenneth H. Roush, P.E., Northside Engineering Services, Inc. • 0 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE STANDARD GENERAL FOR MINOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS PERMIT NO. 46024044.000 [EXPIRATION DATE: September 17, 2007 PERMIT ISSUE DATE: September 17, 2002 This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 40, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with the construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawing(s); plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit. PROJECT NAME:. Oak Cove Renovation GRANTED TO: Church of Scientology Religious Trust 319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 ABSTRACT: This permit is for the renovation of an existing building and the enlargement of an existing unpermitted pond. The enlarged pond will provide water quality treatment through effluent filtration. OP. & MAINT. ENTITY PROPERTY LOCATION: SEC/TWP/RGE: TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: PROJECT SIZE: LAND USE: DATE APPLICATION FILED:. AMENDED DATE: SPECIFIC CONDITIONS Church of Scientology Religious Trust Pinellas County 16/29S/1 5E 1.79 1.79 Acres Semi-Public August 9, 2002 N/A 1. ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4,UG 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEW CITY OF CLEARW,ATU,I 1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the. subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person.. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums. 2. The discharges from this system shall meet state water quality standards as set forth in Chapter 62-302 and Section 62-4.242, F.A.C., for class waters equivalent to the receiving waters. Permit No. 46024044.000 Project Name: Oak Cove Renovation Page 2 3. Unless specified otherwise herein, two copies of all -information and reports required by this permit shall be submitted to: Tampa Regulation Department Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 U.S. Highway 301 North Tampa, FL 33637 The permit number, title of report or information and event (for recurring report or information submittal) shall be identified on all information and reports submitted. 4. The Permittee shall retain the design engineer, or other professional engineer registered in Florida, to conduct on-site observations of construction and assist with the as-built certification requirements of this project. The Permittee shall inform the District in writing of the name, address and phone nurnber of the professional engineer so employed. This information shall be submitted prior to construction. 5. Within 30 days after completion of construction of the permitted activity, the Permittee shall submit to the Tampa Service Office a written statement of completion and certification by a registered professional engineer or other appropriate individual as authorized by law, utilizing the required Statement of Completion and Request for Transfer to Operation Entity form identified in Chapter 40D-1, F.A.C., and signed, dated, and sealed as-built drawings. The as-built drawings shall identify any deviations from the approved construction drawings. 6. The District reserves the right, upon prior notice to the Permittee, to conduct on-site research to assess the pollutant removal efficiency of the surface water management system. The Permittee may be required to cooperate in this regard by allowing on-site access by District representatives, by allowing the installation and operation of testing and monitoring equipment, and by allowing other assistance measures as needed on site. 7. The operation and maintenance entity shall submit inspection reports in the form required by the District, in accordance with the following schedule. For systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration or systems utilizing effluent filtration or exfiltration and retention or wet detention, the inspections shall be performed 18 months after operation is authorized and every 18 months thereafter. .8. For dry bottom detention systems, the detention area(s) shall become dry within 36 hours after a rainfall event. If a detention area is regularly wet, this situation shall be deemed to be a violation of this permit. 9. Refer to GENERAL CONDITION No. 15 herein. 0 Permit No. 46024044.000 Project Name: Oak Cove Renovation Page 3 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them. Authorized Signature _. ?... ORIGINAL RECEIVED ??!!S 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEP.,;, CITY OF CLEAE' ?7r'Rp' impervious:. Pond. @. DHW Elev 9_o- Pervious: Cpost = o-_6.4 Water Quality Retention Required (S'WFWMD):: Volume= 77,877 s1 x 3/4" x 1612 = 4,967 c.f.. Retention Volume Provided (SWRWNM)---.._ Set Top of Control Structure at Elevation. 9.0 Volume Provided= 4,880 c.f. OX.- 257-84.0-1. 6,519.6.` 49;673'.9 . ORIGINAL RECEIVED 3.0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER «- u r S, F a . 0. % APRy2 STAGE ft-NGVD AREA. SF AREA AC STORAGE `CF " 6..00: 510 0.0:117 0 . 6:50; . 8182 0.;0203 .' 348 7.00 12.55 0.02888 '. 882 : 7,510 ` 1627 0..0373' 1,603 ; 8`.00 ; 19-99 , 04:.0459 ' 2;.5Q9 8.50 2371 0:0544 3,602 :. .9-0.0. : 2744 . 0--..06-30t 4,;881`: 920 2893 : 0.0664 5,444 . 9.50 , 31:1:6 ; 0.071.5 : 6,3`46 DRAINAGE AREA REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH REQUIRED' WATER. QUALITY VOLUME AVAILABLE, WATER QUALITY = 77,-8:77 SF 0'..75 IN- 4,867 CF 4;88.1. CF ORIGINAL RECEIVED 302 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ELEV TOTAL INCR; L-.' ` HG, FILTER FLOW PONEY .` INCR = INCR FT HEAD• HEAD=.. AREA: (CFM)- AREA VIOL --- -: TIME .. , ..: . .. _ 2784 : 3.38: :.. 0:75 : 2.75 ; 1`:23 . 45 4.9.7 : 1871: 376 8':25 : 2205T 2.63 075 : 2:75 0.95 45 3:87 : 1437 _ 372 - T.50 1627 : 1.88 0:75 . :2;75 ;: 0:68 45 s . 2.76 1003 ; 363 ;. 1048, > . 1: 1'3 0.75 2:75 0:41 .. 45 .: 1:.66 .. 569 ,::.. _ .. :. 343 6..00 . 469 TIME:=. _ TIME ree.ize. ecies_ tin an other ` pertinent comments - 1 15'1 Sabal Palm .... Rating 3 - 22 7'' Live`Oak Rating = 3 3 15" Sabal Palm 4 Rahng= 4 15" Sabal Palm 4 Rating= 5 4" Cherry Laurel Rating = 2, extensive mechanical damage 6 15 Sabal Palm ' 4 Rating= 7 15" Sabal Palm 4 Rating= 8 15" Sabal Palm Rating 4 ...- = 9 15" Sabal Palm Rating= 4 10 10" Sabal Palm Rating - = 4 - 11:... Ir Sabal Palm _ :.._.. Rating = 4 f 12 15" Sabal Palm = 4 Rating - 13 10" Sabat Palm Rating = 3, scars on base of trunk 14 15" Sabd Palm 4 Ratiog= 15 15" Sabal Palm Rating = 3, minor trunk damage.. 16. „ ' - 15" Sabal Palm Rating = 4 17 -15" Sabal Palm,"' Rating .._ 4 1 15" Sabal Palm = Rating 4 22 15" Sabal: Palm Ratio = .4: 15 ' Sabal Palm Rating = 4 24 15» Salial' Palm Rating - 4 . - 25 15" ' Sabal Palm Rating = 4, minor trunk damage 6. 15Sabal Palm Rating = 4 27, :15" Saba Palm :1 7 Rating..= 4 t _. :. = 28 5" Red Ba Y. Rating = 2, mechanical wound, leaning 29 15" Sabaf -Palm Rating 4 30 15" Sabal Palm 4 Rating = 31 4" Sugarberry Rating 3 - 32 15" Sabal Palm 4 Ratiog= 33 15" Sabal Palm = 4 Rating - 34 3" Sugarberry Rating = 1 35 4" Sugarbeny Rating = 1, trunk has split 36 3" Sugarberry Rating = I - 37 .... :. 1»::Sabal Palm.. Rating _ 4 38 8" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 39 15" Sabal Palm ' 3 Ratiog= 40 8" Sugarbeny Rating = 3, broken branches, slight trunk decay, 41 12" Sabal Palm _, - Ratiog= 4 . 42 T' Sugarberry Rating = 2, broken branches, severe lean, potential hazard. a - 43 1 ?',' Sabal Palm Ratan g-=741 4,4 -.: 6' Sugarbemr Rating = 3 central leader, .is broken; .prone, to_ correct` 45 10" Sabal. Patin Ratang 4 = 46 9" Sabal Palm Rating = 4 47 9" Saba! Palm Ratan 4 g - _ 48. ?" Saba1 Palm y: Ratm 3 49 9"`Sabal Palm Rating 3 = 50 10" SabalPalm g ..: 3 = 51 ., 15 Saba! Palm Rating = 3 - r 5 35' Zve Oak R _ 3 t - at ing 53 1.5" Saba] Palm Rating - 3 54 4" Sugarberry Rating = 3 55 12" Senegal Date 3 Ratiog= 56 14" Camphor Rating = 3 57 10" Camphor Rating = 3 58 11" Sabal Palm Rating = ?, -3 59 11" Sabal Palm Ratiog= 3 60 14" Sabal Palm = 4 Rating - 61 12" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - = 1 r" Saba1T'alm _ . ; Rating = 3 - 63 9" Sabal Palm Rating = _ -, 64 23" Indian Date Ratio 4 g Palm 65 11" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 Senegal Date 66 Palm _. = - . Rating 0; fallen. 10" Sabal Palm E; 67.-1 Rating= 4 _ ?n1i+lAl AI 58 8'' Sabal Palm Ratm 3 _, .. , 69 1:0' Sabal Palm Rating. = , 70 8" Sabal Palm. g..= Ratio 3 71. 1.4" Indian Date Ratio 3 g Palm 4" Sweet Bay J'r Rating = 3 Magnolia 73 5" Sweet:Ba y Rai. 3 ing Magnolia :..:. _ '.. 74 22" Sweet Bay Ratio g 3 Magnolia . u 75 : 13" Sweet Bav Ratuzg= 3 - f Magnolia .76 13" Sabal Palm Rating = 4 _ 77 11 Sabal Palm 4 Ratiog= 78 24" Live Oak 3 Ratiog= 79 24" Pignut Hickory Rating = 4 80 5" multi-stem Rating 3 = Senegal Date Palm 81 12" Sabal Palm 4 Ratiog= 82 12" Camphor 3 Ratiog= 83 11" Sabal Palm 3 Ratiog= 84 14" Sabal Palm Ratio 5 85 11" Sabal Palm 4 _ 8= 86 12" Sabal Palm 4 Ratiog= 87 12" Sabal Palm .-Rating = 3 88 12" Sabal Palm 3 Ratiog= l P l 12" S b a a m 8 9- 90 11 Sabal Palm Rating = 3 9>l. 12" Sabal°Raim Ratio - 3 f,_ g 1 ..4 92 Sabal Pa m Rating'= 4 ~ ,. 9 13" Sabal Palm , Ratzng = . . 9.4 I l" Saba] Palm Rating = 3 95 12" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 95 I3" Sabal Palm . Ratm 3 _ 97 ' Ca np Rating = 3 98 3Sabal Palm Rating 4 . 99 12'" Sabal Palm Rating: _ 3 ; .. . I 00 12" Saba] .Palm - :: Ratm ' 3 g of 9" Sabal Palm Rating 3 _ l02 12" Sabal Palm Rating 3 = ' 103 12" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 104 12" Sabal Palm 3 Rating= 105 10" Sabal Palm 3 Rating= 106 14" Saba] Palm Rating 3 - 107 7" Senegal Rating = 3 IOS 12" Camphor Rating - 3 .. ' 109 66" Live Oak 3 Rating = 110 5" Camphor Rating = 3 14" Sabal Palm Rating = 4 112 14" Sabal Palm = 4 Rating - 113 13" Sabal Palm Rating 3 - 114 16" Java Plum 3 Rating= 115 - 29" Live Oak Rating 2, hazardous branches 116 12" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 117. 14" Sabal::Palm;. 'Rating'- 4 4 . i 18 4' `Cherry Laurel:`- l R.atm g ? ... ".. ? 1 I;9' 15 7 1\TOrfolk staid Rating_ 3 : ... Pine 9" Viburnuir.. Rating = 3 i?1 20" Sabal Palm : Ratin = 3 t 12-2 5" Viburnum Kafiri = 3 . 1.23 1 5" Sabal. Palm .. ; Rating = 3 1:24 18 Sabal Palrii Ratirig_ 3 : ;. 2? Sahal:.Palm...., : . Ratm . , .3 :> . 20"-:Sabal,Palrn Rating` -3 .,.: 77 - 12 . > 187': Saba' Palm.,. Rating = 3 :...... _ : . 128 4" Che Laurel Rating 3 1:29 6CC Laurel" ;_Ratiri 130 4" Che Laurel Rating:. 0,,:' Ostl -broken. off, f ` I I: 11 ' =abaT' Palm , Ratiri = 3 :132 l Sabal Palm Ratin = 3 1'33 11" Sabal Palm_ Rating = 3 134; : ;. 8" Sabal Palm 135 9" Sabal Pahn 136 9" Sabal Palm 137 5" Cherry Laurel L38 : 8" Cherry Laurel 139 5" Laurel Oak 140 20" Southern Red Cedar 141 14" Laurel Oak 142 12" Sabal Palm 143 5" Laurel Oak 144 32" Camphor 145 24" Camphor 146 ' 9"Cherryy urel 147 18" Brazilian Pepper 148 22" Camphor 149 5" Brazilian Pepper 150 13" Brazilian Pe r 151 10" Doubl&,, Camphor 152_ 167.:Sabal-:Palm. _ ..: 153 24" Monkey Puzzle mg=3 ing = 3 ing = 3 ing = 3 ing = 3 i-M=7 Rating = 3 hazardous nanng = z, over prunea Rating = 3 Rating = 2 Rating = 2, extensive trunk damage, pot Rating = 2, extensive deadwood Rating =1, poorly vruned Rating = 0, noxious, remove Rating = 1, basal decay, hazardous Rating = 0, noxious, remove Rating = 0, noxious, remove Rating =1, hazardous 155 18" Mediool R; ing =3' ing = 3 ing 3, ing = 4 ntial hazard . t i - r -_ . Qc:' 21 :D4 0'.9 44;a BUTLERS ..uR:S;ERY 7:275415027 = P _1. r -154 10 Scheffiera Rating: 3 : , Katl ' ` .4. . ? I56 1:4";Sabal Palm` "Kahn :. 3 1.57. 1'4" Sabal Palm . Rating 3 158 8" Cherry I:aurel. Ratio = I _ 159. 8"-Ch Laurel . :Rahn `= 2 , 160.. . 67 CberTY Laurel Rsti =:I T 61 15" Brazil'?an Py"` Ra 0' noxious; remove 162::: _ I.0" Saba1 Pahri „ Rahn 163 .."= 10" Sabal: Palen';; Ratui ._w `_ 3 -: 164 1-0" Saba] Palm Rahn = 3 165 .:'. . F.0" Sabah Palm::. 3 166 10" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 . ; 167..... l0" Sabal??alm: Ratio 168. 10". Sabai°•'Palrn'.: 3 .. Sabar Pali ' -Ratio = 3. f 170 10'Brazilian Pe ` r Rahn = 0, noxious, remove 171 10" Sabalj, -alm. Ratio = 3 172 12" Saban Palm Ratio = 3 173 18" Sabal Palm Ratio = 4 174 12" Sabal Palm Rating = 3 175 9" Sabal Palm Ratio = 3 176 11" Saban Palm Ratio = 4 1-77 15" Sabal Palm Ratio = 4 178 10" Sabal Palm Ratio = 3 179 13" Sabal Palm Ratio = 4 180 20" Sabal Palm Rating = 4 I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further, affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Chuck Butler, Certified Arborist Certificate #FL-1235A Biitler's Nursery, Inc. 7011 75'h Street North Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 :(?7}544-045 p}ione (727) 541-5027 - fact 7 RECEIVED 30 PIA?iN1hf C? ?3?f?Af?TIE/?i`?PI' . , . CITY QF CCEARWR k ?A Clearwater Fire & Rescue o 610 Franklin Street - Clearwater, Florida 33756 Public Works Administration - Engineering Department 0 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756 (Revised 03/29/2006) This worksheet is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fire Pump before any permits for new building construction, building expansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply with Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 - Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to include applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) and AWWA M-17 - Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Fire Hydrants. fl INFOe MTI:ON.. ,' ------------ 7 M Project Name: ©AV. CO?.E REJJoVAT?oN Project Address: 2o0 6ScEVt.,4 f}vFJ?v£ C?Ak W!fTFR? F6337$ Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant: OOCTA SHOE of ?o,-i srrO Hydrant #: 3a Size of Water Main Supplying Fire Flow: Looped System or Dead End Water Main? D£AD £,vt? Static: 70 psi Residual: ro/ psi Pitot: 1/0 psi Flow: /0 60 gpm Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Riser: Horizontal 70 Ft. Vertical Elevation 3 Ft. Hydrant Test Conducted by: C/ry c,,r acAQwATEx . V) ATEtL O FPAfLTmsmT (include/Attach Copy of Actual Test Sheet) C7. M Area # Classification Al ATEL ROOM5 LlCni- HA?ARO LAVNDAY 09PJWAP-Y GwuP(r) K1TCAtti D0 0WA0-q t:ko" PCO AESTAyRANt StfF0611t H/42A A0 MECHAaJCAi- QAC,"S ode 01Ao4Y G40^0' (2) Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary Description of Hazard Protected (Commodity Description, Storage Height and Arrangement, if applicable): '?i'PJCAt goo-6 :Rx,6r'JNG 4kk* A.vD B4rtiJ1A?,6 Aoe,# T1 OCAL ComMkK144 LA-AbR`c Qd>M Filx0 CooK%o 6 AlZeA TWICAt_ OuuAi%n fo MeA F0k31P1tiEJJT Ko?>M1 /STv?A6? ORIG"NAL RECEIVED' k,el? 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 1 of 3 CITY OF CLEARWATER DESIGN PARAMETERS Area # System Type Area (sq. ft.) Density (gpm/ft) Inside Hose (gpm) /HOTEL i2ovm5 W VV I'Soo 0.10 loo t.AVNaQV w 6T 1S00 0.16- 100 AIrCH'Fy w?c 1$00 0.ao iW (ZEST. SEAT)w ET %5co O. i!7 10v .-fFem'jN)CAL \4 BT 1$Db p2.0 ?ey Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary Outside Hose (gpm) 150 tSn ?S? ifa ?So Total Needed Fire Flow (N.F.F.) Sao Is Existing System Supply Sufficient to Meet N.F.F. Above? No X_ Yes CODES AND STANDARDS System Component Applicable NFPA Standard/ Year Edition and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes SPt 11v,tXA S Y&TE,4 NFPA 13 - 99 2c of FLOteuo 64,1wi v6 ca)-g STANAQ1Pi- t HOSE SYsfE.ti NFPA 1y-CO a00i FIC4VDA %U%LQ11JG CODE AQIle A_f Fine SERWcE MAws NFPA 2t/--9.S ?tW? F 0,%ftrt bV1L0i,F(, COQE Zvs,P q-1oN,TESy/NGyrlh-gwr ArFP4-25-98 ).a>k FLvc'ai0A 6yiLpt,?6 te-00 i;raE f1w4s fJFPA-7.0-q9 aov\ FuvA1oA t?vtiO?iJC,c OE Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary If Project Includes Fire Pump, Supply the Following: Fire Pump Information: Pump Capacity: XODD gpm Churn Pressure: I to psi Rated Pressure: ;2,0 psi Pressure @ 150% Flow: 108 psi On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?): NO PREPA (_ /:SPECIFIER INFORMATION Preparer Name: f9ARot sT?_ J Lv, Nz Company Name: _• G1O tf-%06 PR&F C5510.OALS , /,vc, Mailing Address: 173o wEST L\v EL&0b STREET SV1TE 1` City: %AMPA State: F-Die/DA Zip: 336 Phone: 1S13-2Si- 46'849 Fax: V1- Z51 -1' 68 E. Seal ORIGINAL kt {'133 3 0 20060 Page 2 of 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER i 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ .,.1 + ?\? •(: ?•vw't:?•-b:Y1'1n: - ' . I ' •<• rY 1 ???.: t`. ?L i V:??i ? ' ' ? , i.'2.:" `S'- •?. t: ? ' , i?'`)?.fl1a''s?f ?a,i?..h•4`.?r:r <i'h - ?•t!•~ ?: v:'iy:•s?\Y/1...?+,i?1?'"Y, :w .7 _ _. (••. :.??I .1 - ••Y V / .... ? ? • :; ? si f ? ' r '' ? :a:•Q.F's.: a: ::_4:L"'iZi IY•T... ::` .l? l? ?,? ", . . s _ • i,°? . J . K 1: . . ;•. ..2?: ,??yy ?'?.f'.F 5. t?;k•%: i' -l.? . ?1. .Fff:?-?t:, d'S:y [\.... ?'i :[.'?ja. • v `?il!'ti c??.!,. .) e. i:..'? ?? r???: ?.•:: 1 '-•: • ??':... '.1.::.. n .. R '?':: ? ?• • ? ,taYnr? ; . ; • :....: `.4 : •i .?p:f; t• 4.Cr4 ,;!r':t' - .:•:.<, .`.•e ??..r, nls.. t•' Ji"'.'1^.. ... -•i' ? _!.:y ?:- .,;??{??i1•..1? YS?',HY??i •1Jat'M.•;'1. " ' u ... • ih,+ •?'•:. «: V1•p.+q: !•?cr=^•1.?''.- '" . . _?? :.•IV. L: r2?•? . ail'}R l\'f.a•1.Y `.1'{? ?1•I.M' t .: •. .. ... _ .1?-.t: .t.:? ? ? __ , q :7" Y '? 'L ' ? ° Ct ? v,: ?.... ? .• '. : ; • ^r'" ... . , ? a? . ?..`_ : ?: '; K ? f`L ? , y ;lvyl l , Cyr C- -??,rd FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT 0 ll A ' 1LOCATION Q PATE OF TEST S7ATlC:- 70 - -psi C-1 -d- S6. .,gm a7 RESIDUAL tC7 PSI PITbT PSI -.$? P'LO'W ? GPM FLOW a 6 a Pg c7t? S?? c -?i HY0'RANT # 3a :1`1 21 -06 ar FraRlD # ,7Z 6 - CUSTOMER UQUESTINQ TEST ORIGINAL RECEIVED ?,U" 30 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ADDITIONAL. INFORMATION' REQUIRED Fire Prevention Items to be Addressed Prior to DRC Apprroval: 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a. FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, NFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and NFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 2. When an FDC is required, it shall be a minimum of 15 feet from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40 feet. This hydrant shall not be located on the same main as the Fire Sprinkler and must. be on the supply side of a double detector check valve. This hydrant is in addition to the hydrant that is required for firefighting purposes that is to be within 300 feet of building, as the hose lays, and on the same side of the street as the project. 3. Provide and show on the plan a minimum 30-foot turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrances and exits. 4. Provide and show on the site plan 24 feet of width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where driveways are split by an island with one-way traffic, each side of the island shall provide and show on the site plan 20 feet of width at the driveways on each side of the island. 5. Provide a Fire Department access roadway (with turn-around, Y, T or cul-de-sac) in accordance with NFPA 1. A Fire Department access roadway must have 24-foot clear width and 14-foot vertical clearance, and be capable of supporting the weight of Fire Department vehicles (80,000lbs). ORIGINAL RECEIVED k,+ e 30 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 3 of 3 The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the provisions of Section 2-903; 2. The proposal complies with requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 3.. he a omplies-with--General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of-''Section 3=91=3, 4. The proposal will conform to the Downtown Design Guidelines; and _ 5. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: - I. That all other future changes to the exterior of the building be reviewed by Staff for compliance with Downtown Design Guidelines and all applicable Code requirements. ORIGINA kECE .Pursuant to Section 4-3.03; an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard-Development approval (December 27, 2005), asapphcable. All ;required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year'of the date of issuance of the-building permit Time frames do not change with successive owners. An extension of time may be granted by the Community. Development Coordinator for `a .period ,not to exceed one year an d only within the' origin al period of validity. The. Community Development Coordinator. may approve an additional extension of tnot to exceed one year for :good cause shown and documented in writing. The -Coorduator must receive the request for this, extension within the one-year period of validity after the original time extension The issuance of-this Development Order does -not relieve you of the necessity ao obtain any'biuld ng permits or-pay any impact fees:Ithat rriaybe 'required. In order to facilitate the issuance of anyperrnrt or license affected by this :a.pproyal,``.please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal may be initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property-owners who presented competent substantial evidence'in thel"evel' One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on January 3, 2005, (seven days from date of Development Order). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark T. Parry, Planner III, at 727-562-4558. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: http://www.myclearwater.com/. * Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely; Cynthia H.'Tarapani, AICP Planning -Director, o 46171625 12-13-2001- 16:37:49 MY WRIT0ii DEUM - 51, 41DED=Bff Is/99S 1 3S°afl. o? - 0 Al,SI pt od i' 1RECORDING #:0143M7 (5S 1 SF1:0774 EPG:?7? DOC STAMP - DR219 3 $35,000.00 RUORD FEES 9 $2.00 ?e PAGES ACCT ! ...?- .::. :... ' TOTAL-., $35 00 CK Ate DIEM AHT.TBM: $359026.00 ? #.130 Thin instrument was prepared by E-_ //}}?? C? DS DR219 OL? 1 :1 DF.PiTiY f1Rl{ and return to: DS _ Amber F. Williams, Esquire INN ?- -- Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, FEES P iNELLAS CO E eK131 73CI1 PG 77? MTF Ruppel & Burns, P.A. P/C ' ' ????? IM US 110 HE IS Im 1111 P. O: Box-1368 REV Clearwater, FL 33757-1368. o?-lam°i' WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE made:.tEj:is '`I day of..a_ Dece_ mber,• 2001, between BEF, INC., a Florida not-for-profit.corpdrafit6n, successor by merger with THE OAKS OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florad`-09t-#or-profit corporation, as to'Parcel 7 and BEF, INC., a Florida not-for-pro t %Corporation F/KIA BAPTIST ESTATES.OF FLORIDA, INC. F/KIA THE AMERICAN ;BAPTIST ESTATES OF CLEARWATER, INC., as to Parcel 2 ("Grantor"), whose..add?ess is: 420 Bay Avenue, Clearwater-, Florida 33756, and TOM DEVOCHT,;ias,'T>rustee of the CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST, with full powl; -and'•ai thority either to protect, conserve and to -sell, or to lease, or to encumber, or othtrtiieejo manage and dispose of the real property described in the recorded instrlimen# ("Grantee"}, whose address is: 319 South_ Garden Avenue, Clearwater, Florida33756... WITNESSETH• _ That he-Grarifor, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and vkluabl.'e consideration, to Grantor in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowlo4gi d, has granted, bargained, sold, aliened, remised, released, conveyed and confirrrmed1:;.::ahd., by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien, remise, release, convey anci. ,coiifirm unto the Grantee, and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forev6r all,'-af Grantors interest in that certain parcel of land lying and being in the Coutlty bf Pinellas, State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: P?rcel'1 . Unit 1, OAK COVE, A CONDOMINIUM, according to the plat thereof recorded-in ; Condominium Plat Book 102, pages 92 through 95 inclusive, and being further described in that certain Declaration of Condominium recorded in Official Record Book 6966, page(s) 1889, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, toget ,,r an - RECEIVED kU.G _3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT' CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 PINELLRS couNTY FLA. OFF REC ;.BK: 11731 PG 77S undivided interest or share in the common elementt appurtenant,thereto- :and-any amendments thereto. Parcel 2: Unit 2, OAK COVE, A CONDOMINIUM.,,acc. or inj to the plat thereof recorded in Condominium Plat Book 102, pages 92.1h ugh 95 inclusive,. and being further described in that certain Declaration of Cohd 'm nium-recorded in Official .Record. Book 6966, page(s) 1889, of the Public Records; of Pinellas. County, Florida, together with' an undivided interest or share in the. dommoit 'elements appurtenant thereto and any amendments thereto. Parcel No: 16-29-15-62131-00.0-0010"and ' 16-29-15-62131-Qoo-.DO2,0,..: , Tax Identirication Number af. Gra7?f9ee: TOGETHER WITH 411--the' tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances, with . every privilege, right,.`aitre*, ..interest and estate, dower and right of dower, reversion, remainder and easerneitt thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE,AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And the" Gantor'does covenant with the Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the premises; :th4t.he premises are free. of all encumbrances, except as set forth on Exhibit "A7/'a "' .'eo hereto and made a part hereof, none of which shall be . reimposed lei'eby, ' and that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell the same; a, That Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said lands, and will defend the same 6bg inst'the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. ORIGINAL RECEIVED U" 3 0 2005 2 - PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Signac re 3 1 BEF, INC., FIKIA BAPTIST ESTATES OF FLORIDA, INC. F/K/A THE AMERICAN BAPTIST ESTATES OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida not-for- pro"rporatioV/// By: Pri t Na Its: Vice Pr Taaffe ORIGINAL RECEIVED t:s 13 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF-CIW'WATEk Print Na e J FL-S P INELL Pb RS OUNTY 11731 777 OFF REC.6K STATE OF FLORIDA ; COUNTY OF . I- AA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this j` 'day of December, 2001, by Malcolm Taaffe, as Vice President of BEF, INC., a. Florida not- for-profit corporation, successor by mergr.,witi THE OAKS OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida not-for-profit cor oration,:.,vn •behalf of the corporation He/She ? is personally known to me- OR F? has ' ptodhced identification C,1 otary Public taint vMW Print name: _c+±moooeeeo? z ?t1gW 04, 2W4 My commission a ??: _ STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF ?- The foregoing~ Jrtstrument was acknowledged before me this- jc2? day of December, 2001, b? Idlalco1m Taaffe, as Vice President of BEF, INC. F/K/A BAPTIST ESTATES OF FLORIDA, INC. F/K/A THE AMERICAN BAPTIST 'ESTATES OF CLEARWATER.. }iY?l , a Florida not-for-profit corporation, on behalf of the corporation. : H6/,56e 0 is personally known to me OR ? has produced as identification. 4-1% Loan Notary Public * m,commiw ocaem, Print name: My commission expires: #255440 VT ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4 A, lG 3 0 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF, LEARWATFR i NNW PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.6K 11731 PG 778 _ -s s 'EXHIBIT 1. Taxes for`the year 2001 and all subsesluentyears. 2. Terms, conditions and provisions; -contained in the Declaration of - Condominium of OAK COVE.' recorded in O.R. Book 6966, page 1889, together `-with such additions and r amendments _ to said : Declaration, and Condominium Plat as: from time to••tirrie may be made, of the Public Record' of,Pinellas County, Florida. 3. Error on `Recorded Plat as, recorded in O.R. Book 7131, page 1089, Public Records of Pinellas County,. Florida. .4. Service and Right of Entry. Agreement to Vision Cable of Pinellas, Inc. as recorded in O.R. 8woK10.306, page 1498, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 5. Easement in faVbr,'of.! Florida Power Corporation set forth in instrument Y_ recorded in.O. .,Book 4249, page 1987, Public Records of Pinellas County, :., . Florida. >6: Utility Easement `in favor of the City of Clearwater set forth in instrument recordcd,.itv.'R. Book 11604, Page 1717, Public Records of Pinellas. County, ' Florida.../....* G 4 T R 1 f Pwr.ull! PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 8, 2007 Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: Minor Revision to FLD2006-04019 - 210 S. Osceola Avenue (Oak Cove) Dear Mr. Bond: At its meeting of December 19, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with conditions the above referenced Flexible Development application for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office (place of worship)/overnight accommodations use (Phase 1) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court Street under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. On August 6, 2007, a request was submitted to provide a full enclosure for the HVAC cooling tower located between the principle structure and the Osceola Avenue right-of-way. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4-406.A of the Community Development Code, the proposed revision has been deemed to be a minor revision and is hereby APPROVED. The approval of this minor revision is based upon, and must adhere to, those development plans date stamped received August 6, 2007, and is further subject to those conditions of approval associated with the original Development Order, which remain in effect. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 5624539 or via e-mail at robert.. teffl ??invylearwater. corn. Sincerely,. Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director S: (Planning DeparimentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslOsceola S 110 - Oak Cove (D) - ApprovedlMinor Revision - HVAC EnclosurelOsceola S 110 - Minor Revision Development Order 08-08-07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Mr. Robert Tefft Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 E AL!a 7Q01 _..1 ?.__....- .__..._ ? . p4 _ T ?..-o,,.,?:.?sT SEf V1,._" ALP Cl t Y OP CLEARVIfATR 3 August, 2007 Re: Oak Cove Development Order FLD2006-04019 Minor Revision Request Dear Mr. Tefft, Now that the Oak Cove building HVAC cooling tower has been replaced with the new one, we very much wish to screen the entire tower with something that will improve the appearance at the front of our building. A photo of the cooling tower is attached. Our proposal is a structure that integrates with the main building, as shown in the rendering. This structure would have discreet columns and pilasters to eliminate the "box" look, and by necessity would have louvers to let the air flow to the cooling tower. It would not have any more decorative architectural elements 'than shown so that attention is not drawn to the structure. The intention is that the enclosure looks much better than the tower itself, but is less. interesting than many other building and site elements on the property. The structure would be inside of the approved wall as shown in the rendering. Please consider this letter a request for approval of this minor revision to the City of Clearwater Development Order for. this site. If additional information is needed I can eached at. any time at 638-9088, or by e-mail at flblldesigners(a')scientolo-a-p-e . Sincerely James Bond Owner's Representative CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY a' ?t t 1 e ?' 3fl iAi:: s ..o t mom U I Nor ` l Rj v e a L t:f x i v All L 17- 4 • qT. ` 4 dW =1 I 17Iil, f 04' uot 4 Ell ?r ?t t .? C7: LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW December 19, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Possr Orl=Icl: Box 4748, CI.FARWA-rER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLF, AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-04019 (210 S. Osceola Avenue) Development Order Dear Mr. Bond: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 19, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office (place of worship)/overnight accommodations use (Phase 1) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006- 11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court Street under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 1.79 acre subject property is located on the west side of Osceola Avenue between Pierce and Court Streets; 2. That the subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as the subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; FRANK I111M KI), MAYOK )rnIN I GRAN, CO>UNOLMEwser I10)-I I IANIIIA ON, Ccx'N(:ILNIE>IBF1,' BII.I. JoNSUN, Cc rncu.1nt?nseiz ® CARI.FN A. PF I FRSHN, Cot u:ILMENMF:R "EOIIAI, EiNIPLOYNI N'I' AND AI?I'IRNIATIVI? ACTION F,\IPLO) FR" 0 • 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-903.C, 2-903.J and 2-903.K of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Transfer of Development Rights criteria as per Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the wire fencing is replaced with fencing permissible within the downtown and complementary to the principle structure with regard to material, texture, size, shape and color (i.e. masonry wall, vinyl fence, etc.); 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all outdoor lighting shall comply with the requirements of Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code; 3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule; 4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, shall be placed underground; 5. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 6. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 7. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 8. That the shuttle service being operated by the Church of Scientology as mitigation to the parking deviation continue to be operated in conjunction with this use; 9. That the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be interim and shall not become the ultimate use of the property; 10. That the first building permit for the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be applied for within one year from the date of the Community Development Board approval (by December 19, 2007); 11. That all required Certificates of Occupancy for the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit; 12. That the first building permit for the ultimate overnight accommodation use must be applied for within 18 months of the date of the Community Development Board approved (by June 19, 2008); and 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy for the ultimate overnight accommodation use must be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. 0 0 Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert. to ffigniyclearwater. com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S. (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationslOsceola S210 -Oak Cove (D) - ApprovedlOsceola Ave S210 - Development Order 12-19-06.doc L:qlj a E & L SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. 521 Chestnut Street Clearwater FL 33756 Phone (727) 466-6772 Fax (727) 466-6882 email kencrete(cbaol.com FL Certificate of Authorization 7983 November 9, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Attention: Mr. Robert Tefft Reference: Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization FLD2006-04019 Oak Cove Redevelopment 210 South Osceola Avenue Subject: Transmittal of Additional Information Dear Mr. Tefft: Thank you for your review of our recent submittal. Enclosed with this transmittal letter are the following: 15 Each Revised Flexible Development Application (1 Original + 14 Copies), 15 Each Revised Attachment D with Applicability and Flexibility Criteria, 15 Each Application for Transfer of Development Rights(1 Original + 14 Copies), with Attachments A, B, C, 15 Each Previous Development Order (FLS2004-11067 Dec. 27, 2004), 15 Each Ownership Documents, 15 Each SWFWMD Permit (No. 46024044.00), 15 Each Tree Inventory, 15 Each Fire Flow Calculations, 15 Each Traffic Study 15 Each Reduced Size Site/Civil Plan (1 Color+ 14 Copies 8-1/2" x 11 15 Each Reduced Size Landscape Plan (1 Color + 14 Copies 8-1/2" x 11 15 Each Reduced Building Elevations (1 Color+ 14 Copies 8-1/2" x 11 15 Each Front Signage Details (15 Color 8-1/2" x 11"), 15 Each Property Surveys (15 Copies, No Originals Left), 15 Sets Site/Civil Plans (Sheets C1.1, C2.1, C3.1 Latest Revision 11/02/06), 15 Each Landscape Plan (Sheet L1.1 Latest Revision 11/02/06), 15.Each Building Elevations (15 Copies 24" x 36°), 15 Each Floor Plan ( 1-13-24"x36") 15 Each Roof Plan ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Based on the DRC comments and meeting of November 2"d, (attached) we've revised the plans, elevations and application materials to address those comments. They are discussed below based on the various disciplines offering commentary. 0 0 Oak Cove Transmittal of Additional Information Page 2. General Engineering: 1. We acknowledge the first eleven comments need to be addressed and handled prior to issuance of the building permit. The construction drawings and specs, with these comments addressed, will be forwarded to the building department after the CDB meeting on December 19th. As-builts and recorded easements over all unrestricted water lines will be submitted to the city after construction and before the C.O. is issued. Fire: 1. We also acknowledge that the building is being brought up to all current codes. 2. The church intends to continue work under the currently active permit (BCP2004-06722) for interior renovations of the major building components. Upon approval of the new use of mixed use (interim for Fort Harrison renovations) and the final use of overnight accommodations, we will submit an application for all appropriate permits to finish the renovations of the building as a hotel. 3. We acknowledge the building is a high-rise and intend to meet all applicable fire code requirements. Landscaping: 1. We adjusted the size of the interior islands as well as the locations of the shade trees to provide a minimum of 5 feet from any impervious area. 2. Loquat has been replaced with Cherry Laurel (Prunus caroliniana). 3. The size of the symbol used to identify the location of a Southern Magnolia tree has been depicted in a manner that is consistent with the actual size of the tree when .planted. 4. We re=calculated the number of trees required. We went back to the tree inventory to determine the number of palms and trees to be removed. There were 23 palms to be removed, and they will be replaced one-for-one. The trees to be removed totaled 64 inches. When divided by 2'f inch caliper, 26 new trees are required. This number of trees corresponds to a minimum of three (3) species. We've actually selected four (4) species: Southern Magnolia, Live Oak, Cherry Laurel, and River Birch, each accounting for at yeast 10% of the total. Solid Waste: 1., 2., 3. We started a discussion with Tom Glenn at the DRC about the feasibility of a compactor installed in the service area, rather than rolling out the dumpster for solid waste pickup. These discussions will continue. Of concern was the staging area where the truck could make the pickup, then safely turn around to exit the site. Recycling has not yet been added to the project, but it's feasibility will also be discussed with Mr. Glenn. ORIGINAL RECEIVED MOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARiivitio CITY OF CLEQRN = r% Ll ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 Oak Cove Transmittal of Additional Information PLANNING DEPARTMENI Page 3. CITY OF CLEARWATER Traffic Engineering: 1. We modified the handicap parking access to the interior sidewalk. The curbing was removed so as to provide a flush connection of the handicap aisles to the sidewalk. 2. The anticipated volume of pedestrian traffic will not be enough to warrant a wider sidewalk. After hearing the discussions at the DRC, it was decided to keep the sidewalk width 4 feet. 3. The handicap sign detail is now shown on Sheet L1.1. The sign locations were already on the plan. 4. The drive aisle is dimensioned for two-way flow throughout the parking lot. At the DRC we agreed that this change to two-way flow would be made. The changes appear on Sheet C3.1. 5. We added a stop bar and stop sign on the north and south sides of the sidewalk for southbound and northbound traffic in the parking lot. 6. We added a stop bar and stop sign to the north driveway. 7. The bench and trash receptacle by the south driveway have been removed. 8. The bench and trash receptacle by the north driveway have been removed. 9. We met with Paul Bertels and Ben Elbo to discuss the mid-block crossing. Additional safety features were agreed to be added prior to building permit, and they supported its proposed location. Therefore the mid4ock crosswalk remains on the plans as originally proposed. Planning: 1. The parking stall within the sight triangle has been removed. 2. The 6' white vinyl :louvre enclosure proposed around the AC cooling tower has been changed to a masonry wall with columns of similar style to the walls at the front of the property. This can be seen on the perspective included with the colored elevations. 3. The site data table has been revised to clarify that the Phase I (Interim Use) includes church -offices for religious services, plus hotel use. 4. The front wall has been modified to :include a solid masonry bottom section 3' height with wrought iron grillwork to a maximum 6' height. At the driveway are the monument signs, same as previously submitted. 5. Phase II roof and floor plans are included with this transmittal. 6. The Flexible Application Criteria, Attachment D has been revised to address how flexibility is justified upon compliance with the design objectives described in Section 2-963 of the Community development Code (See pages 7 and 8 of Attachment D). 7. The elevated deck is now shown on the building elevations. It is proposed to be built during Phase I.I. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 Oak Cove Transmittal of Additional Information PLANNING DEPARTMEN) Page 4. CITY OF CLEARWATFG 8. The elevation views of the building have been revised to clearly identify the new additions from the existing building. 9. The site data table has been revised to clarify the Phase I and Phase 11 areas being utilized. The lobby addition is 656 s.f. on Floor 1 only. The new elevator addition is 88 s.f. added to each floor. 10. The Flexible Application Criteria, Attachment D to the application, describes in detail how the project complies with the applicable Plan, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan (See pages 9-12 of Attachment D). 11. As discussed at the DRC, 2 types of fencing are now proposed. The north perimeter fence will be a 6' height black steel fence with vertical pickets. This is the same fence that was recently approved for Hacienda Gardens and Sherwood Gardens. Along Osceola Avenue is the proposed masonry and wrought iron grillwork fence discussed in No. 4 above. 12. The lobby and porte cochere design have been revised to more clearly identify a base, middle and cap to these new sections of the building (See revised East Elevation). The church met with Mr. Tefft on Monday, November 6th to show him this revised east elevation, which was deemed to be acceptable to meet this condition. There are no significant revisions to the remainder of the existing building; therefore, the balance of the building is not subject to the Design Guidelines, pursuant to page 80 of the Guidelines. 13. The 14' drive aisle under the porte cochere has been identified on Sheet C3.1 and will be separated from the sidewalk and loading areas fronting the new lobby the addition by a 6" straight curb. Several curb cuts will be strategically placed for luggage carts. 14. The dimensions of the elevator shaft shown on the site and landscape plan are at the ground level only, taken from the architectural drawings. The rendered architectural elevations show the elevator shaft addition for the full height of the building. 15. The chain link fence has been removed and replaced with a 6' height black steel fence with vertical pickets, similar to the approved fence at Hacienda Gardens and Sherwood Gardens. 16. The church requests a transfer of 82 units from the sending site for a total of 252 hotel rooms to be :developed on the Oak Cove site. The application and plans have been revised to reflect this request. 17. The Flexible Application Criteria, Attachment D to the application, has been revised to respond to this comment (See pages 3-4 of the Attachment D). 18. The columns supporting the proposed porte cochere are now depicted on the architectural elevations.. 19. The church selected a proved nce for its north perimeter. It is a black steel fence with vertical pi The vertical pickets will accent the verticality of the columns of the building. Along the ROW of Osceola Avenue, the ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Oak Cove Transmittal of Additional Information CITY OF CLEARWATEP Page 5. masonry wall was revised to meet the Design Guidelines. See Nos. 4 and 11 above. 20. We acknowledge that outdoor lighting details will comply with Section 1302 of the Community Development Code. Details, cut sheets and photometric information demonstrating compliance, will be furnished with the building permit submission. 21. Interlocking brick pavers are included in the project to accent the pedestrian ways. 22. The roof drainage is all interior to roof drains. There are overflow scuppers that are shown on the elevations. Please schedule us for the December 19, 2006 CDB. Thank you. Sincerely, E & L SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. Ke n th H. Roush, FL License No. 33366 KHR:az 1.30 pm Case Number: FLI)2006-04019 -- 210 S OSCEOLA AVE Owner(s): Church Of Scientology Religiou C/O Huber, Mary Salinas Tre Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: James Bond 319 S Garden Ave Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727-467-5000, FAX: 727-445-7277, E-MAIL: flblldesigners@scientology.net Location: 1.79 acres on the west side of Osceola Avenue between Pierce and Court Streets. Atlas Page: 286B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office/overnight accommodations mixed-use (112,739 square feet) until June 2008 (Phase I) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (252 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights 1T5R2006-00000 of four overnight accommodation units from the property located at 645 Frank m Street under th provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Pierce 100 Condo Assoc. Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33756 100 Pierce Street TELEPHONE: 442-7512, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 34 • 0 Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Proposed sidewalk treatment shall be approved as a separate right-of-way permit to work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Obtain and provide to the city a copy of a recorded easement granted by property owner to south to permit access into sanitary sewer manhole. 3. Indicate on the plan that sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 4. Note on the plan that Sanitary sewer manhole cover(s) shall not say "Clearwater" or City of Clearwater" on them. This system is a private system. S.Applicant shall show all city details applicable to this project. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp . 6. Provide a cleanout in the proposed sanitary easement and include Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305, page 2/3. 7. Revise plan to indicate all fire hydrant assemblies installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line, and at the fire hydrant assembly (F.H.A.). 8. Will dumpster access be impede by proposed porte-cochere? Indicate on the plan a minimum 14 foot vertical clearance to be provided over vehicular use area. 9. Applicant shall provide a copy of an approved D.E.P. permit for the installation of the sanitary sewer extension. 10. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. (City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30. 11. Turning radii at all driveways shall be a minimum of 30 feet per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards index #108. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy: 12. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida, prior to any C.O. being issued. Public Works/Engineering to field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. 13. An easement shall be granted to the City of Clearwater over all unrestricted water lines, inluding fire hydrants and recorded. 14. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues Fire: I . On page 7 of your application and agent information sheet you mention a request for temporary use for religious services and this is also a hotel, as this building was a A.L.F. this is a change of use and this will bring this project up to all current codes. Acknowledge PRIOR'TO CDB 2 . What are we doing with this project ? We still have an outstanding permit for this property , are we going to cancel BCP2004-06722 ? Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 3 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 35 Land Resources: I , No Issues. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1 shade trees shall be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any impervious area. The majority of the Southern Magnolia trees are proposed to be planted within five feet (5') of impervious areas. 'M 4-A CAU- Ll It is recommended that the proposed Loquat be replaced with a heartier species.""`""' The landscape plan depicts the proposed Southern Magnolia trees with varying canopy sizes. Depict all trees/palms consistently on the site plan and in a manner that is in keeping with the actual sizes of the trees/palms. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.4 of the Community Development Code, based upon the total number of trees proposed, a minimum of four (4) species need to be provided. Only three (3) speicies have been proposed. Additionally, each species shall account for a minimum of 10% of the total number of trees - neither the Loquat nor the Dactylifera Palm are proposed in sufficient quantities to meet this requirement. r IgGR b1 ? b b_? ? 3 CCQ Parks and Recreation: 1 1 . No issues - project in CRA. Siormwater: 1 , No Issues. Solid Waste: 1 , That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. 2. Please show staging area on Osceola, or show turn around area if Solid Waste Truck needs to come on site to service Dumpsters. 3.Show area for recycling carts. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 a handicap access ramp from the handicap parking stalls to sidewalk on the property. 2. Relocate light poles to widen sidewalk to at least 5 feet, especially to the west of the handicap parking stalls. 3. Show handicap sign detail and location on site plan. 4. Consider adding provisions for two-way flow throughout the parking lot. 5. Add a stop bar on north side of sidewalk for southbound traffic in the parking lot. 6. Add a stop sign and stop bar to north driveway. 7. Move bench and trash receptacle (located by the south driveway) to the west for better sight visibility. 8. Move bench and trash receptacle (located by the north driveway) out of the sight triangle. 9. Relocate entire Osceola Ave. mid-block crosswalk and all associated signage, markings, etc. to the four-way stop intersection of Pierce St. and Osceola Ave. The above to be addressed prior to CDB. Traffic En rneering: 1 , Provide General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 36 • 0 ,,Pl' Pursuant to Section 3-904.A of the Community Development Code, no structure or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet (8') above grade within the 20-foot sight visibility triangle at the intersections of drive aisles and rights-of-way. The development proposal includes a parking space within the sight visibility triangle formed by the intersection of the northernmost drive aisle (north side) and Osceola Avenue. A deviation will need to be requested to allow this encroachment to occur (i.e. reduce the size of the sight visibility triangle). p?? 22.. Provide a detail of the proposed six foot (6') white vinyl louver enclosure. ?-? ? t*V'A11r GP'VI? f9AOQ'r .QO ,!5y The description of request addendum states that phase I (interim use) is church and hotel; however the site data table identifies phase I as office only. Clarify what is being done in pint I and how much. *61- Pursuant to Section 3-804.A.2 of the Community Development Code, within the Downtown (D) l District brick or other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substantial grillwork are permitted to a maximum height of six feet (6) when in front of the principle building. Provide Phase II roof and floor plans for the building. 6 . Pursuant to Section 2-903.C.6 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill SC°E ?IUII? Redevelopment Project criteria), a written response is required to be provided stateing how flexibility with the development standards is justified based upon compliance with design objectives a - e. The responces provided do not address these objectives. The "future elevated deck" has not been depicted on the architectural elevations. Also, what is the timeframe in which the deck is proposed to be built? Revise the architectural elevations to clearly identify the new additions from the existing building. The site data table denotes 173,231 sf as existing, 112,739 sf (floors 1-8) with phase I and 183,579 sf with phase 11. What is the remaining 60,492 sf being utilized for in phase I? Where is the additional 10,348 sf coming from at phase II (only 3,000 sf is being added)? X. Pursuant to Section 2-903.C.2 of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria), a written response is to be provided stateing how the redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The response provided does not address the Comprehensive Plan. Rather than attempting to utilize four (4) differing wall/fence types, provide a single consistent wall/fence material. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Design Guidelines, buildings should have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". The modifications proposed to the building begin to establish a "cap" that is set apart from the "middle"; however what is proposed is not distinct, merely painted a different color. Additionally, the base, while being more set apart from the "middle" than the "cap" was, is still set apart mostly be paint color rather than architectural design. The elevations that were previously proposed were far more consistent with the provision of a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". '' Is the drive aisle beneath the new porte cochere seperated/buffered from the lobby addition by any raised pavement section? The drive aisle does not seem to have been adjusted to account for the lobby addition. d? The dimensions of the elevator shaft addition as per the site and landscape plans are not consistent with the architectural elevations. Pursuant to Section 3-805.A of the Community Development Code, chainlink fences are prohibited within the Downtown (D) District. The proposed chain link should be substituted for another fence material and the existing chainlink will need to be removed/replaced as part of this development proposal. Also, please be advised that the maximum allowable height with the area between the side and rear property lines and the building is six feet (6); thus the proposed height of eight feet (8') would not be permissible. r-r-RICT, 16 . The 1.79 acre site generates 170 overnight accommodation units; and a total of.. , vernight ?atr Z y ?, accommodation units are proposed. This creates a deficit of 78 units; however 82 units (four more than necessary) are proposed to be transferred to the site from the property at 645 Franklin Street. Please clarify/revise. Pursuant to Section 3-913.A.4 of the Community Development Code, a response is to be provided stateing how the development proposal has been designed to minimize traffic congestion. The response provided states that one (1) entrance (ingress/egress) exists along Osceola Avenue, while in actuality two (2) ingress/egress points exist. Provide a revised response that takes this into account. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 37 9 0 ,)S'. The columns supporting the proposed porte cochere are not depicted on the architectural elevations. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Design Guidelines, fences and walls a f,' shall compliment and be consistent with the principle structure with regard to materials, texture, size, shape and color. Additionally, solid fences and walls along rights-of-way shall be no higher VA->V ?-? than three feet (3') and any portion above three feet (3') shall be at least 50% open. C20 . Pursuant to Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code, all outdoor lighting shall comply with the requirements set forth in said section. Provide details, cut sheets and photometric information as necessary to demonstrate compliance with this section. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Design Guidelines, the use of interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials shall be used for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. How is roof drainage being dealt with? If drainage features (i.e. scuppers, gutters) will be visible, have them depicted on the elevations. Other: No Comments Notes: This development proposal has been tentatively scheduled for the 12/19/06 CDB agenda. In order to remain on this agenda, submit 15 collated sets of revised plans and application materials addressing all of the above comments by Noon, Thursday, 11/09/06. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 2, 2006 - Page 38 • FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental October 6, 2006 Mr. Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: TDR Application, 210 S. Osceola Avenue Oak Cove Dear Robert: Please find enclosed one revision regarding the Transfer of Development Rights application for the Oak Cove building located at 210 S. Osceola Avenue. The only change to the original application is to reduce the size of the Sending Site. When the application was submitted, the Sending site was shown as the entire block bounded by Franklin and Court Streets, East Avenue to Garden Avenue. This Sending site has been reduced in size and is shown on the enclosed survey as "Tract B." The existing uses on Tract B are the Church of Scientology Energy Plant and a stormwater pond. Tract A on the same survey is the parking garage site, with the garage under construction. The size and legal description of the sending site, Tract B, have been revised on the enclosed application. All other portions of the application including the Receiving site and the number of units to be transferred remain as originally submitted. The purpose in reducing the size of the Sending site is to preserve any potential development rights on the parking garage site for future development plans, while allowing an adequate Sending site to transfer the desired hotel rooms to the Oak Cove property. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this minor revision. Thank you. Sincerely, Cynthia Tarapani, AICP Vice President, Planning Attachments c: E.D. Armstrong, w/attachment Uli Huber, Church of Scientology, w/attachment James Bond, Church of Scientology, w/attachment Ken Roush, E & L Support Services, Inc., w/attachment File: 2006-0024-10.06 ;pcm K:\Church of Sciento1ogy\Letters\tefft.01.doc ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 0 6 2066 PLANNING CITY OF LLEARWA ER 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com • L FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. EAMINEERS. EWROWEWAUSJS. SURVEYORS & PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 Letter of Transmittal ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 0 6 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Attn: Robert Tefft, Planner III Date: October 6, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Dept. 2006-24-10.06 Address: 100 South Myrtle Avenue Job No: Oak Cove Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: Church of Scientology From: Cyndi Tarapani Oak Cove Building Application Copies Date No. Description 1 10/6/06 1 Cover Letter re Revised TDR application 15 10/6/06 2 Revised TDR Application 5 10/6/06 3 Revised Zoning Ma showing TDR sites 15 ?piz/©? 4 ?Ketc h Descr'lp-I;a,-) f-of Sena"n SVkc- (10r t'11-6kes These are Transmitted as Checked Below: ? For Approval ? For Your Signature ® For your use ® As Requested ? Approved as noted ? Returned for Revision ? For Review and Comment ? Other: ? Please print name below and Signed: ' o ' ? return via fax as having been received. cc:' James Bond Uli Huber Ed Armstrong Ken Roush If enclosures are not as noted, kindly inform us at once Phone: (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 0 0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posy Orrici: Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORInA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVU s Njil,DING, 100 Sou i-i i Mvin'u, AVENUE, Cu. ARWAl•BR, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 F,vx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING Drw'pMi: 'f RIiVIEW September. 5, 2006 I Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLD2'006-04019 - 210 S. Osceola Avenue - Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Bond: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-04019. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, October 5, 2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. ;You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Please be advised that this finding of completeness is contingent upon the submittal of a parking demand study no later than September 11, 2006. If said study is not received by this date, then the application will not move forward to jthe DRC as stated above. i i Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) x'562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.teffl&nkclearwater.coin FRAXh I IIIMAI M, MA) HK JUAN KORAN, Can NCu1 k)V1 I IAM11.1 ON, COI NCHAIFIINIBIT' BILL j0NU)N, 0A (.11A1kNIHF; ® CARLEN A. Pi irrseN, COi -wil %1 mIWI,' 'T (H i,V. I?,\II1I (» .\11:N'1 AND Ar•rn;.?i:? rn i•: Acre iN FINI LO) FR" • CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° } C arw e, ater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL.: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: September 5, 2006 To: James Bond, (727) 445-4359 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2006-04019 (210 S. Osceola Avenue) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: rohert.teff(Libnyclew-water.con? ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** 0 Sep. 05 2006 02:18PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94454359 Sep.05 02:16PM 01'00 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-1-E1_P-FAX C435-7329). E & L SUPPORT SERVICES. INC. 521 Chestnut Street Clearwater FL 33756 Phone (727) 466-6772 Fax (727) 466-6882 email kencrete(Waol.com FL Certificate of Authorization 7983 September 5, 2006 City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Attention: Mr. Robert Tefft Reference: Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization FLD2006-04019 Oak Cove Redevelopment 210 South Osceola Avenue Subject: Additional Information Dear Mr. Tefft, Thank you for your letter on August 30, 2006. Per your request please find enclosed with this letter the following: 15 Each Revised Landscape Plan (Sheet 1-1.1 Latest Revision 09/05/06) 15 Each Reduced Size Landscape Plan (1 Color + 14 Copies 8-1/2" x 11 15 Each Attachment C. 15 Each Property Survey of Sending Site (1 Original + 14 Copies), 1 Each Zoning Map with the sender and receiver sites. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, E & L SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. VK-Z q p, Kenneth H. Rou , P.E. FL License No. 33366 KHR:az ORIGINAL RECEIVED c ,? 0 5 2006 PLANNING DEPP,RTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER- • LONG RANGP? PLANNING Dim"L01 MEN'f RIiVII?W August 30, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos-r OPPIci: Box 4748, CLEARWATPR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES 131111.DING, 1.00 SOUTH MYR'i,u,, Aw-NUE, C1.8A mxi,iiR, FLORIDA 33756 ,fELITHONE. (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-04019 - 210 S. Osceola Avenue - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Bond: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-04019. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. Pursuant to Section H of the application, the landscape plan must depict the interior landscaped areas as being hatched and/or shaded and labeled with interior landscape coverage expressed in both square feet and percentage covered. 2. The Transfer of Development Rights application is to include the following: ? A statement that the development rights have not been previously used or exercised by another person; ? A sealed survey for both the sender and the receiver sites with the square footage or acreage of each site; and ? A copy of the zoning maps with the sender and receiver sites clearly highlighted and labeled. Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Tuesday, September 5, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robef-t.'tefft(a)navcleanvater. co>'n I [":\Nn I IIIt]i'\1fI), ibLwcwa ??nIN UI>r,AN, C<?rNCU..?u:.?ntr,i; I I()).r I IAmII:I'Oy, Col NCILMEM[ P]; 13n.i. Jlma??N, O WNCILNIFMISIT' ® ("ARLE.N A. PrIFE.NEN, C(Wv(:1L\1D1B11R 'T(WAL VNIPi 4 )) MEN r A.NI) Ari ir.\1A H\,i: ecru )N I?MITM I "' • • CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° C1,earwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: August 30, 2006 t/55q To: James Bond, (727) 445-7277 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2006-04019 (210 S. Osceola Avenue) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefft(a_mvclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.nwdearwater.com ** Trmi ssion Report Date/Time Local ID Local Name Company Logo This document was confirmed. (reduced sample and deta i l s below) [document Size Letter-S CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° ? rwater : 100 SouTH MYRTLE AvEms . • ' _ CLEAamATRR, FLoRmA33756 I TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 662-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Total Pages Scanned Date: August 30, 2006 1*71 To: lames Bond, (727) 445.7277 From: Robert G. Te11t, Planner III Re: FLD2006-04019 (21 D & Oxona Avenue) Number of Pages Including Co rSheet:2 Coamsenra: ^Plnsc conf no¢iptvia a-mall eC in6an.rarRCom.e! nvarar e_?pg ???Ieit?M PI®nia amnea online at 2 Total Pages Confirmed - 2 8-31-06;12:53PM 7275624796 'No. Doc Remote Station Start Time Duration Pages Mode Comments Results 1 226 94454359 8-31-06;12:52PM 1109" 2/ 2 EC CP 9600 Notes - EC: Error Correct BC: Broadcast Send CP: Completed HS: Host Scan HF: Host Fax RE: Resend PD: Polled by Remote MB: Receive to Mailbox MP: Multi-Poll PG: Polling a Rerrlote PI: Power Interruption RM: Receive to Memory DR: Document Removed TM: Terminated by user HP: Host Print FO: Forced Output WT: Waiting Transfer HR: Host Receive FM: Forward Mailbox Doc. WS: Waiting Send r E & L SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. 521 Chestnut Street Clearwater FL 33756 Phone (727) 466-6772 Fax (727) 466.6882 email kencreteV)aol.com FL Certificate of Authorization 7983 City of Clearwater Planning & Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Attention: Mr. Robert Tefft August 30, 2006 Reference: Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization FLD2006-04019 Oak Cove Redevelopment 210 South Osceola Avenue Subject: DRC Submittal Information Gentlemen: Enclosed with this letter are the following: 15 Each Flexible Development Application (1 Original + 14 Copies), 15 Each Attachment D with Applicability and Fle)ability Criteria, 15 Each Application for Transfer of Development Rights(1 Original + 14 Copies), with Attachments A, B, C, 15 Each Previous Development Order (FLS2004-11067 Dec. 27, 2004), 15 Each Ownership Documents, 15 Each SWFWMD Permit (No. 46024044.00), 15 Each Drainage Calculations (From July and August 2002), 15 Each Tree Inventory, 15 Each Fire Flow Calculations, 15 Each Reduced Size Site/Civil Plan (1 Color + 14 Copies 8-1 /2" x 11"), 15 Each Reduced Size Landscape Plan (1 Color+ 14 Copies 8-1/2° x 11 15 Each Reduced Building Elevations (1 Color + 14 Copies 8-1/2"x 11', 15 Each Signage Details (15 Color 8-1/2° x 11"), 15 Each Property Survey (15 Copies, No Originals Left), 15 Sets Site/Civil Plans (Sheets C1.1, C2.1, C3.1 Latest Revision 08/30/06), 15 Each Landscape Plan (Sheet 1-1.1 Latest Revision 08/30/06), 15 Each Building Elevations (15 Copies 24° x 36"), Parking Demand Study will be submitted on or before Sept. 11th. Please schedule us for the October 5, 2006 DRC. Thank you. SUPPORTS VI ;enneth n , H. Roush, P.E. L License No. 33366 KHR:az ORIGINAL RECEIVED t,i e% c, 0 2006 PLANNING Dkl ??.?v ?•Jl CITY OF CLEARWAIIEE i 0 0 Q, LONG RANGE PLANNING DFVFLOPMENT REVIEW April 28, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICF BOX 4748, CLFARWATFR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.F AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-04019 - 210 South Osceola Avenue (Oak Cove) - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Bond: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-04019. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: Pursuant to Section B of the application, a project valuation is to be provided. 2. Pursuant to Section D of the application, response are required to be provided for the Comprehensive Infill criteria. While responses were provided to the criteria in the application, the application is unfortunately out of date as the Comprehensive Infill criteria have changed as of April 20, 2006. Provide responses to these new criteria. 3. Pursuant to Section G of the application, the following items are to be provided on the site plan: ? All dimensions [mainly needed toward the middle and rear of the site]; ? All required sight visibility triangles; ? Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site [provide better delineation of the Osceola right-of-way]; ? Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; ? Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); and ? Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned). 4. Pursuant to Section H of the application, the landscape plan is to include the following: ? Sight visibility triangles; ? Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; ? Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ? Quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials listed within the plant schedule; FRANK 1 11I1I3ARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE MAYOR .10IIN DORAN, COUNCB MEMBER HOYL HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PL:LERSeN, COUNCIL AIFNIBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND API--IItMATIVi? A("ITON EMPLOYER 0 0 ? Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; and ? Irrigation notes. Pursuant to Section I of the application, the building elevations are to include the following: ? Dimensions [there are various levels of height within the building - provide dimensions]; o Colors [while colored elevations were provided, no notations as to the colors, or color samples identifying the actual colors were]; ? Materials [provided notations on the plans as to the existing/proposed materials of the building; ? Also, the proposed building elevations must be drawn to scale. 6. Pursuant to Section L of the application, submit a completed Fire Flow and Hydrant Worksheet from the Fire Dept. 7. Section N of the application has not been provided. This Section is the Affidavit to Authorize Agent, which is necessary for this submittal. 8. The applications submitted (FLD2006-04019, FLS2006-04024 and FLS2006-04023) will need to be resubmitted under one application. This is necessary due to the existing Unity of Title that exists between the Oak Cove property, the Fort Harrison Hotel, and the FLAG Building as well as the necessity of having a Unity of Title between the FLAG Building and the parking garage site. Many of the same plans (although revised to meet completeness conditions) will be able to be reused in this resubmittal; however an overall site plan showing all of the parcels involved will need to be provided (this would include the Fort Harrison Hotel even though no changes are proposed). Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Friday, May 5, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tefft@myclearwater.com 0 0 Apr. 28 2006 01:07PM YOUR LOGO . YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94457277 Apr.28 01:04PM 02139 SND 07 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 9 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° 1 arwater ?e 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~_ - CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: April 28, 2006 James Bond, (727) 445-7277 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2006-04023; FLS2006-04024; and FLD2006-04019 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 7 Comments: In addition to the attached letters regarding the above referenced projects, I will be emailing you a copy of the most recent Comprehensive Infill application and the Fire Flow and Hydrant Worksheet. ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.te ft a, myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the provisions of Section 2-903; 2. The proposal complies with requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 3 ..The;-plan-cornplies-witlrGe=al Applicability Criteria under the provisions of=Section 3=913, - 4. The proposal will conform to the Downtown Design Guidelines; and _ 5. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all other future changes to the exterior of the building be reviewed by Staff for compliance's-:: with Downtown Design Guidelines and all applicable Code requirements. December.27 2004 ?> Bond -Page Two ' i .concur ,with the findings. of ;the .Development Review Committee and, througfi this `letter appTcve ' `your application for F,iexrble Standard Development wifh the above condition. T'he.approval is:based =? __ on :and must adhere to- the elevations, colof samples and application dated received November' 12, - 2004. .Pursuant to Section 4-303;. an application .for a building permit shall be made within one-.year of Flexible Standard Development approval (December 27, 200.5}, as applicable. A1Lrequired ccrEficates - . _. _ - ? . ~" =of occupancy shall be obtained within one yeai° of the date of issuance of the` building pernut : 3'ime ` ?? `? ,frames do not change with successive owners. An extension of time may tie granted, by the Communty -? ? ? - - ` ? Development Coordinator fora period not to exceed one year and only'within the original `period of '?? - validity. .The. Community Development Coordinator may approve an additional extension of tmi'e=not . _ __ to exceed one yeai for good cause .shown and` documented in writing.. The'Coordinator must receive.: ` the request for this extension within the one-year period of validity after the original time extension:' - ? . .. ... ,, ,, - ..::- 'The-issuance of"this Development Order does not relieve-you of the necessity `to obtain any building permits or=pay?any unpact fees-that may be=iequired. In order to facilitate the' issuance`of anypermit?or ... license affected by this `appro?al,? .please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for?'=any'- . ... ,_ permits or licenses that rcquiTe this prior-development approval. Pursuant to Section 4-502.A, an appeal maybe initiated within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued by an applicant or property owners within the required notice area and who presented _ competent substantial evidence in the Level One review. A copy of the Development Order is being sent to those surrounding property-owners who presented competent substantial evidence?in the'l:evel'` -` One review. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case will expire on January 3, 2005, (seven days from date of Development Order). ,,, . If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Mark T. Parry, Planner III, at 727-562-4558. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: http://www.myclearwater.com/. * Make Us Your Favorite! . 'Sincerely, . _. ?.._ ..__ ? ` f o?? Cynthia H. Tarapani, AICP Planning ?D?irector, 0 0 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. Meeting Date: ' -5 ey&-n Location: 9 ? Current Use: IlAegNf7- C:?r t ? a.,.,ce Active Code Enforcement Case (no) yes: GC. (i'we /-65-ee below M"-6,11 200 Address numb (yes) no) (vacant land) a---Landscaping (yes) (no) 'Poor o-Overgrown yes (no) xDebris (yes) no Q,-Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes no building(s) (good) fair (poor) (vacant land) encing (none) (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) C- aint (good) (fair (poor) (garish) - rvinj p- Grass Parking (yes) no -o Rdsidential Parking Violations (yes) no a,- `ignage (none) (ok (not ok) (billboard) marking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ? Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ,pfutdoor storag ye) o) S'.? -'-' Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): P Date: eviewed ey: 1 Telephoner 7 2 3 Revised 3-29-0 *OY04-03 1 ? 0 Page 1 of 1 16 / 29 / 15 / 52131 / 000 / 0010 27-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:22:52 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST OBK: 11731 OPG: 0774 C/O HUBER, MARY SALINAS THE 319 S GARDEN AUE CLEARWATER FL 33756-5423 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 210 S OSCEOLA AUE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 2004 : sales from 2003 - 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/Unq) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/2,001 11,731/ 774 5,000,000 (U) I 1989: Book 102 Pgs 092-095 0 /0 01 0 0 ( } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 5,700,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 5,700,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 5,700,000 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CWD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dey Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 138,152.04 1} 0 x 0 14.00 77,481.93 S Special Tax CWI .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 138, 152.04 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be : 138, 152.04 Short Legal OAK CODE A COMMERCIAL CONDO Description UNIT i AKA FLOORS 1 & 3 THRU 13 L http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=16+29+15+62131+000+0010&o=1 4/27/2006 t i • Page 1 of 1 16 / 29 / 15 / 02131 / 000 / 0010 :01 27-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:22:52 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: ALF < 4 Stories Property Address: 210 S OSCEOLA AUE Prop Use: 356 Land Use: 74 S?ruc?ural E1?m?nts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Fire Proof St Steel Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up}Metal16yps Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 768 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,975 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 15 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3 -I E3 Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 161,359 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 8,140 6) .00 0 3) Canopy .25 586 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 iD) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commf--rc1a1 Extra F+E3a-turE3 s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) ASPHALT 14400SF 1.75 14,400 25,200 25,200 999 2) PATIO/DECK i024SF 10.00 1,024 10,240 4,100 1,975 3) ELEU PASS 2 30,000.00 2 60,000 24,000 1,975 4) FIRESPRINK 24400SF 1.75 24,400 42,700 20,920 1,975 5) ELEU STOP 2 3,500.00 26 91,000 36,400 1,975 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 110,620 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.usihtbinlcgi-gifl?p=16+29+15+62131+000+0010+01&o=1&t=3 4/27/2006 0 • Page 1 of 1 16 / 29 I 15 / 62131 / 000 / 0020 27-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:24:02 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST OBK: 11731 OPG: 0774 C/O HUBER, MARY SALINAS THE 319 S GARDEN AUE CLEARWATER FL 33756-5423 EV'AC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop pddr: 210 S O SCEOLA AUE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 2003 2004 sales from - : 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/2,001 11,731/ 774 5,000,000 (U) I 1989: Book 102 Pgs 092-095 0 10 0/ 0 0 { 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 417,600 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 417,600 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 417,600 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dev Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 10,121.45 1) 0 x 0 100.00 1.00 T Special Tax CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 10, 121.45 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 10,121.45 Short Legal OAK CODE A COMMERCIAL CONDO Description UNIT 2 AKA CONVALESCENT AREA L http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=16+29+15+62131+000+0020&o=1 4/27/2006 0 0 Page 1 of 1 10 / 29 / 15 / 02131 / 000 / 0020 :01 27-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:24:02 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Nursing Home Property Address: 210 S OSCEOLA AUE Prop Use: 337 Land Use: 78 S?ruc?ural E1?men?s Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Glass Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Fire Proof St Steel Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Corrugated Metal Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Uinyl Asbestos Tile Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 70 Bath Tile Floor + Half Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,975 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 15 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 12,735 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) 00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) 00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 G arrwne!r(--ial Extra F?atur?s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) 00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) . 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-gifl?p=16+29+15+62131+000+0020+01&o=1&t=3 4/27/2006 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: December 19, 2006 *X REVISED X* Case Number: FLD2006-04019 and TDR2006-11032 Agenda Item: E. 3. Owner/Applicant: Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc. Representative: James Bond Address: 210 South Osceola Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office/overnight accommodations use (112,739 square feet) (Phase I) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court Street under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. CURRENT ZONING: Downtown (D) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Central Business District (CBD) USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Dormitory Proposed Use: Office/Overnight Accommodations (Phase I) Overnight Accommodations (Phase H) EXISTING North: Downtown (D) District Vacant SURROUNDING ZONING South: Downtown (D) District Parking Garage AND USES: East: Downtown (D) District Overnight Accommodations West: Downtown (D) District Memorial Causeway Right-of-Way ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.79-acre subject property is located on the west side of South Osceola Avenue between Pierce and Court Streets. The subject property consists of a 132-foot high (13-story) building situated toward the west side of the parcel and an associated off-street parking area located between the building and the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The property was originally developed in 1975 and came to be used in 1985 as a 309-bed assisted living facility known as Oak Cove Retirement Center. The property was utilized as such until August 15, 2001, when it closed out its occupational license. At its meeting of August 15, 2002, the Development Review Committee (DRC) approved a Flexible Standard Development application for the conversion of the assisted living facility to a 240-unit dormitory as an accessory use to an existing Church of Scientology educational facility (counseling) Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 1 • • operated within the Fort Harrison Hotel and to be operated within the Flag Building (under construction). The approval also included repainting the building and minor modifications to the off-street parking area. Subsequently, the DRC modified this approval on May 28, 2004, to include the addition of chases for required ventilation on the north, east and west facades of the building. The building was never occupied as a dormitory; however permits have been issued and remain active for the renovation of the building as such. At present, interior renovation work continues on the building for those elements that are consistent with the current development proposal. Development Proposal: The item before the Board is a two-phased request. The first phase includes the conversion of the previously approved dormitory use to an interim office/overnight accommodation use (112,739 square feet). The second phase would complete the redevelopment of the subject property to a permanent overnight accommodation use (251 rooms). During the first phase of the development, the applicant purposes to complete the previously approved renovations on the Oak Cove building (to the extent consistent with the final proposed use), then to relocate the existing hotel and counseling operations (office) from the adjacent Fort Harrison Hotel to the Oak Cove building. The relocation of these operations from the Fort Harrison Hotel is so that it can be renovated/updated for hotel-only usage. The renovation work on the Fort Harrison Hotel is expected to be completed in June 2008 and coincide with the completion of the Flag Building construction. At this time the second phase of the development will commence and all counseling operations (office) will be relocated from the Oak Cove building to the Flag Building and both the Fort Harrison Hotel and the Oak Cove building will operate solely as overnight accommodation uses. Density: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable density for overnight accommodations within the Downtown Core character district is 95 units per acre; thus the 1.79-acre subject property is permitted 170 overnight accommodation units. However, the development proposal consists of 251 overnight accommodation units, which is 81 units more than allowable. Therefore, the applicant has proposed a transfer of development rights from the property located at 652 Court Street. The development proposals compliance with the criteria for transfers of development rights is discussed later in this staff report. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, there is no maximum allowable height within the Downtown Core character district. Therefore, the existing 132 foot high building (to top of mechanical equipment enclosure) is in compliance with the Plan. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code, within the Downtown (D) District, off-street parking for overnight accommodations is required to be provided at a rate of one space per unit. Therefore, the proposed 251 overnight accommodation units would require a minimum of 251 parking spaces. However, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, the minimum off-street parking requirement is as determined by the Community Development Coordinator based upon the specific use and/or the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual standards. The development proposal includes the provision of 52 off-street parking spaces. As a result, a deviation to the minimum off-street parking requirement has been requested and a "parking need" study has been provided in support of this request. It is noted that subsequent to the provision of this study, the number of rooms and parking spaces proposed were each reduced by one (1). The following is an excerpt from this study (emphasis added): Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 2 • The Church operates a shuttle service on a continuous basis to transport parishioners between the hotels and other Church facilities in downtown Clearwater. The Church also provides shuttle service for shopping trips, movies, and recreational activities. Therefore, there is little need for personal automobile use for people staying at their hotels. As a result, many of the parishioners traveling to the Church hotels fly into nearby airports and take Church operated shuttles to the hotel facilities in Clearwater. Due to the unique nature of the Church's operations, standard hotel parking requirements or use of national publications such as the Institute of Transportation Engineers informational report Trip Generation to determine traffic to be generated by the facility would not provide accurate results for the Church specific operation. The parking requirements for the Oak Cove building have been determined for the interim and final uses of this facility. During the interim use, the Oak Cove building will have 252 rooms, of which 127 hotel rooms and 125 rooms totaling 98,0 76 square feet will be used primarily for counseling area... the hotel rooms will generate the need for 25 parking spaces and the counseling activities will generate the need for 75 spaces, resulting in a total need for 100 parking spaces. The Oak Cove building will have a total of 53 parking spaces. This results in a shortage of 47 parking spaces. These needed spaces will be made up through use of the existing garage in the Fort Harrison Hotel or in the parking structure currently under construction located at 645 Franklin Street. The final use for the Oak Cove building will be to provide 252 hotel rooms. Using the average parking rate developed in this study results in the need for 49 parking spaces. Because 53 spaces will be provided, the ultimate use of the building will have four (4) extra parking spaces. Staff concurs with the findings of the provided "parking need" study that the 52 off-street parking spaces provided with this development proposal will be sufficient for both the interim use and the final use of the Oak Cove building. It is noted that the above referenced parking garage at 645 Franklin Street is to be completed prior to December 31, 2006. Solid Waste Containers and Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view from public streets and abutting properties by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation. The majority of the mechanical equipment for the building exists at ground level between the building and the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The mechanical equipment consists of two (2) pad-mounted utility transformers, two (2) cooling towers and an emergency generator with fuel tank. The mechanical equipment will be screened by a six-foot (6') high masonry wall with sliding gate access, which is consistent with the above requirement. The appearance of the wall will also be architecturally consistent with the building elevations. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR): Pursuant to Section 4-1402 of the Community Development Code, parcels governed by a redevelopment or special area plan may only receive density/intensity transfers from parcels within the same redevelopment or special area plan. Further, pursuant to the Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 3 Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, no limitation exists on the amount of density/intensity that may be transferred to a receiving site. The 0.928 acre sending parcel, which is located within the boundaries of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan at 652 Court Street, was recently developed as the 11,500 square foot Church of Scientology Energy Plant. As a result, this parcel has a remaining density/intensity potential of 81.90 overnight accommodation units. The receiving parcel, which is also located within the boundaries of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan at 210 S. Osceola Avenue, will receive 81 overnight accommodation units from the sending parcel. Based upon the above and as expressed in the table below, the proposed TDR has been found to be consistent with the requirements of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. Consistent I Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market X value of abutting properties; 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; X 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses; X 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function that enhances the I X community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Si ng age: The applicant has included plans depicting signage with this development proposal. However, these plans are for informational purposes only and the review/approval of said plans shall be accommodated through the sign permit and/or Comprehensive Sign approval processes as necessary. Project Phasing: As stated previously, the development proposal will be completed over two phases. The first phase includes the conversion of the previously approved dormitory use to an interim office/overnight accommodation use. Included with the first phase of development is the construction of all improvements associated with the proposal (i.e.: elevator shaft and lobby additions, porte cochere, elevated deck, off-street parking and architectural elevation changes). The second phase would complete the redevelopment of the subject property to a permanent overnight accommodation use (251 rooms), which would likely involve only minor interior modifications. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, applications for building permit are to be made within one year from the date of the Level Two approval by the CDB, with all required Certificates of Occupancy to be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit. With regard to the proposed interim office/overnight accommodation use the timeframes noted above would apply. However, with regard to the ultimate use as overnight accommodations, it is proposed that an application for building permit would be made within 18 months from the date of the Level Two approval by the CDB, with all required Certificates of Occupancy to be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit associated with this phase. It is noted, and attached as a condition of approval, that the proposed interim office/overnight accommodation use must be interim and cannot become the ultimate use of the property. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 4 0 • Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that a key component to diversify the Downtown Core is to attract residential uses with a variety of housing types and prices. The Plan further states that once a residential base is in place, retail, restaurant and services will likely follow, and that it is anticipated that the majority of existing churches will remain and possibly expand. Downtown Design Guidelines: The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with regard to various elements associated with new construction in the Downtown. The Guidelines apply to renovations, rehabilitations and additions to existing structures and any site modifications. While existing developments that do not comply with the requirements of the Guidelines shall not be required to be brought into full compliance, any improvements proposed to an existing development, however, will be required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Guidelines related to the improvements. The subject property does not comply with the Design Guidelines; however a review of these Guidelines was conducted as applicable to the proposed improvements and the following items were identified: Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that parking lots adjacent to rights-of-way shall be screened with either a landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. While the location of the off-street parking lot is not being altered with this development proposal, it is being made to comply with those applicable provisions of the Guidelines as best possible. The proposal includes the provision of three-foot (3') high masonry walls with decorative aluminum scrollwork and columns extending above to a total height of four feet-six inches (4'-6"). While the walls cannot extend the full width of the property along South Osceola Avenue due to driveway locations and their associated sight visibility triangles, the walls as provided will suitably screen the vehicles from view of the right-of-way. In addition to the above, the Guidelines state that interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials shall be used for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. While it is not feasible for the entire off- street parking area to be constructed from pavers, brick, etc., the proposal does include decorative stamped concrete at the driveway flares consistent with the balance of the streetscape improvements along the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Pedestrian Circulation/Access: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways shall be provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. The development proposal includes the provision of a paver brick walkway that connects the existing Oak Cove building to the new stamped concrete sidewalk within the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Buffering and Screening: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. The existing building currently has pad-mounted mechanical equipment along the south property line between the building and the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way, as well as an existing refuse collection area located on the north side of the building to the west of the porte cochere. The refuse area is already well integrated into the design of the building and site and no further modifications are necessary in order to achieve compliance with the Guidelines; however the existing mechanical equipment (transformers, cooling tower, and Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 5 • • emergency generator with fuel tank) are not buffered or screened from view. Therefore, the applicant is proposing a six-foot (6') high masonry wall along the north and east sides of the mechanical equipment. The west side of the mechanical equipment will be well.screened by the existing building and proposed landscaping, while the south side is currently buffered on the adjacent property by a six-foot (6') high chain link fence and landscaping. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Fences and Walls: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the location, height and design of fences and walls shall be compatible with the intended use, design of the site and architecture of the building. As stated previously, the development proposal includes the provision of masonry walls with decorative aluminum scrollwork and columns (at a height of 4'-6") along the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way to screen the off-street parking lot from view, and a six-foot high masonry wall with sliding gate access around the existing/proposed pad-mounted mechanical equipment along the south property line. The location and heights of these walls are compatible with the design of the site and the architecture of the building. In addition to the above, the Guidelines state that chain link fences are inappropriate within the downtown, and pursuant to Section 3-802.17, chain link fences are tantamount to wire fences. Thus, the proposed six-foot (6') high, black, galvanized wire fence along the majority of the north property line and the entirety of the west property line is not permissible. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that the wire fencing is replaced with fencing permissible within the downtown and complementary to the principle structure with regard to material, texture, size, shape and color (i.e. masonry wall, vinyl fence, etc.). Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition of approval being addressed, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Rhythm/Spacing: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". The existing building lacks distinctiveness in all three of these required elements; however the proposed elevations include the incorporation of an enhanced parapet cap, a decorative stringcourse between the second and third levels, and the provision of a lobby addition and porte cochere. These elements, while not necessarily symbolizing the ideal representation of "base", "middle" and "cap", still provide a substantial improvement upon what presently exists and furthers the intent of this Guideline. Facade Design: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that an architecturally prominent entrance shall be located on the primary fagade and be emphasized through the use of a combination of: protruding front gable or stoop, projection/recession in building footprint, variation in building height, canopy or portico, raised cornice/parapet over door, arches, columns, or other similar treatments that emphasize the primary entrance. As the building exists, the entrance doors are located beneath a nondescript drop-off area. The development proposal includes a lobby and porte cochere addition on the primary fagade that will result in a more architecturally prominent entrance than what presently exists. The entrance incorporates a projection in the building footprint, a variation in building height, a raised parapet and columns consistent with the above. Color: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the number and type of building colors should be appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. The proposed building colors, which are consistent with the colors approved for the Fort Harrison Hotel and the Flag Building, are appropriate for the architectural style of the building. The building base and parapet cap will be pale beige to match the precast concrete elements of the Fort Harrison Hotel and Flag Building. The middle of the building will be light beige (Desert Tan - BM2153-50). Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guideline. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 6 • • Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the following applicable Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified: ? Vision: Downtown Clearwater is a major center of activity, business and governments. The development proposal involves the adaptive reuse of an existing 13-story building as overnight accommodations while making minor modifications to its architectural elevations and associated off- street parking and landscaped areas. The proposed redevelopment will generate increased pedestrian traffic in the area that should stimulate the surrounding area and further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The development proposal involves the adaptive reuse of an existing 13-story building that is situated toward the middle of the parcel with its associated off-street parking located between the building and the abutting South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. As the existing building and off-street parking are to remain more or less intact, only a moderate amount of improvements are possible that would result in further compliance with the Plan. To this end, the development proposal includes improvements for the screeningibuffering of the off-street parking area; the provision of a walkway connecting the building, parking area and sidewalk; and architectural improvements providing for a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap" as well as a more architecturally prominent entrance. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Vision statement. ? Vision: An adequate parking supply must be available coterminous with new uses. As previously discussed under the Minimum Off-Street Parking analysis, the development proposal includes a request to reduce the minimum off-street parking requirement from 251 parking spaces to 52 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a "parking need" study in support of this request, and Staff concurs with the findings of this study that the 52 off-street parking spaces provided with this development proposal will be sufficient for both the interim use and the final use of the Oak Cove building. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this Vision statement. ? Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The ultimate proposed use of the Oak Cove building as 251 overnight accommodations is consistent with those applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Plan, the Downtown Core character district and the Downtown (D) zoning district. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ? Objective 21: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The renovations will improve the pedestrian connectivity between the existing Fort Harrison Hotel and the proposed Oak Cove building as well as making general streetscape improvements within the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. A new meandering paver brick walkway will connect the Oak Cove building to a new stamped concrete sidewalk along the west side of South Osceola Avenue that is consistent with the existing stamped concrete sidewalk along the east side of the South Osceola Avenue. In addition, a new eight foot wide,, paver brick, mid-block crosswalk will be constructed within South Osceola Avenue that will line-up with the aforementioned walkway leading to the Oak Cove building and an existing entrance to the Fort Harrison Hotel. Based upon the above, compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ? Policy 1: The Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. As stated previously, existing development are not required to be brought into full compliance with these Guidelines; however any improvements proposed to an existing development will be required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Guidelines. For those improvements proposed with the Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 7 redevelopment of the Oak Cove building, positive findings can be made that the improvements will be consistent with the Guidelines with the noted exception that the wire fencing proposed along the majority of the north property line and the entirety of the west property line is replaced with fencing permissible within the downtown and complementary to the principle structure with regard to material, texture, size, shape and color (i.e. masonry wall, vinyl fence, etc.). Based upon the above and subject to the above condition of approval being addressed, the development proposal will be consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. As discussed later in this staff report, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the applicable policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The renovations will improve the pedestrian connectivity between the existing Fort Harrison Hotel and the proposed Oak Cove building as well as making general streetscape improvements within the South Osceola Avenue right- of-way. A new meandering paver brick walkway will connect the Oak Cove building to a new stamped concrete sidewalk along the west side of South Osceola Avenue that is consistent with the existing stamped concrete sidewalk along the east side of the South Osceola Avenue. In addition, a new eight foot wide, paver brick, mid-block crosswalk will be constructed within South Osceola Avenue that will line-up with the aforementioned walkway leading to the Oak Cove building and an existing entrance to the Fort Harrison Hotel. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 13: Places of worship and social/community centers are considered integral parts of the Downtown character districts. They are permitted uses that may locate or expand at a scale consistent with the character district in which they are located provided that all site plan requirements are met. While neither the interim nor ultimate use is a place of worship, the proposed interim office and ultimate overnight accommodation use is directly associated with a place of worship and will effectively operate as part of a larger campus for the place of worship. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. Downtown Core District Policies: A review of the Downtown Core District Policies was conducted and the following applicable Policy was identified: ? Policy 2: Redevelopment on all property west of Osceola Avenue and south of Cleveland Street should consider the natural Bluff features, the views of Clearwater Harbor and be integrated with the Coachman Park Master Plan. While being consistent with the above geographic criteria, the subject property is outside the scope of the Coachman Park Master Plan; thus achieving integration with said Plan is not possible. However, the proposed redevelopment does consider the existing bluff features and views of Clearwater Harbor and will not alter these characteristics. Based upon the above, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with those policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 8 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 95 hotel units per acre 140.23 hotel units per acre X1 Building Height 50 feet 132 feet X2 Off-Street Overnight Accommodations - 1.0 per 51 parking spaces X3 Parkin unit (251 parking spaces) 1 See above with regard to Density. 2 See above with regard to Maximum Building Height. 3 See above with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.J of the Community Development Code (Offices): Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle Avenue, N/A N/A south of Drew Street and north of Court Street; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design N/A N/A and appearance 2. All street frontages are designed and used for commercial purposes. X 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by X1 all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 2, Division 14. 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment X Plan. 1 See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.K of the Community Development Code (Overnight Accommodations): 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle Avenue, N/A N/A south of Drew Street and north of Court Street. b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design N/A N/A and appearance 2. All street frontages are designed and used for commercial purposes. X 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by X1 all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14. 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Clearwater Downtown Design X Guidelines. See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off Street Parking Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032- Page 9 • C7 The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and anoronriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 10 0 • COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL ONE AND LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. - 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting. materials at its meeting of November 2, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 1.79 acre subject property is located on the west side of Osceola Avenue between Pierce and Court Streets; 2. That the subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as the subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-903.C, 2- 903.J and 2-903.K of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Transfer of Development Rights criteria as per Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office/overnight accommodations mixed-use (112,739 square feet) (Phase I) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 11 use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court Street under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the wire fencing is replaced with fencing permissible within the downtown and complementary to the principle structure with regard to material, texture, size, shape and color (i.e. masonry wall, vinyl fence, etc.); 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all outdoor lighting shall comply with the requirements of Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code; 3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule; 4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, shall be placed underground; 5. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 6. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific, water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 7. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 8. That the shuttle service being operated by the Church of Scientology as mitigation to the parking deviation continue to be operated in conjunction with this use; 9. That the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be interim and shall not become the ultimate use of the property; 10. That the first building permit for the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be applied for within one year from the date of the Community Development Board approval (by December 19, 2007); 11. That all required Certificates of Occupancy for the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit; 12. That the first building permit for the ultimate overnight accommodation use must be applied for within 18 months of the date of the Community Development Board approved (by June 19, 2008); and 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy for the ultimate overnight accommodation use must be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Prepared by Planning Department Staff- ZA Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Future Land Use Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD)I Pending cases)Up for the next CDBDsceola Ave S 210 - Oak Cove (D) - 12-19-06(RT)Dsceola Ave S 210 - Staff Report 12-19-06 REVISED.doc Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 12 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefftA myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. • Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. • Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 13 0 • CDB Meeting Date: December 19, 2006 Case Number: FLD2006-04019 and TDR2006-11032 Agenda Item: E. 3. Owner/Applicant: Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc. Representative: James Bond Address: 210 South Osceola Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office/overnight accommodations use (112,739 square feet) (Phase I) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court Street under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. CURRENT ZONING: Downtown (D) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND Central Business District (CBD) USE CATEGORY: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Dormitory Proposed Use: Office/Overnight Accommodations (Phase I) Overnight Accommodations (Phase II) EXISTING North: Downtown (D) District Vacant SURROUNDING ZONING South: Downtown (D) District Parking Garage AND USES: East: Downtown (D) District Overnight Accommodations West: Downtown (D) District Memorial Causeway Right-of-Way ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.79-acre subject property is located on the west side of South Osceola Avenue between Pierce and Court Streets. The subject property consists of a 132-foot high (13-story) building situated toward the west side of the parcel and an associated off-street parking area located between the building and the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The property was originally developed in 1975 and came to be used in 1985 as a 309-bed assisted living facility known as Oak Cove Retirement Center. The property was utilized as such until August 15, 2001, when it closed out its occupational license. At its meeting of August 15, 2002, the Development Review Committee (DRC) approved a Flexible Standard Development application for the conversion of the assisted living facility to a 240-unit dormitory as an accessory use to an existing Church of Scientology educational facility (counseling) Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 1 • operated within the Fort Harrison Hotel and to be operated within the Flag Building (under construction). The approval also included repainting the building and minor modifications to the off-street parking area. Subsequently, the DRC modified this approval on May 28, 2004, to include the addition of chases for required ventilation on the north, east and west facades of the building. The building was never occupied as a dormitory; however permits have been issued and remain active for the renovation of the building as such. At present, interior renovation work continues on the building for those elements that are consistent with the current development proposal. Development Proposal: The item before the Board is a two-phased request. The first phase includes the conversion of the previously approved dormitory use to an interim office/overnight accommodation use (112,739 square feet). The second phase would complete the redevelopment of the subject property to a permanent overnight accommodation use (251 rooms). During the first phase of the development, the applicant purposes to complete the previously approved renovations on the Oak Cove building (to the extent consistent with the final proposed use), then to relocate the existing hotel and counseling operations (office) from the adjacent Fort Harrison Hotel to the Oak Cove building. The relocation of these operations from the Fort Harrison Hotel is so that it can be renovated/updated for hotel-only usage. The renovation work on the Fort Harrison Hotel is expected to be completed in June 2008 and coincide with the completion of the Flag Building construction. At this time the second phase of the development will commence and all counseling operations (office) will be relocated from the Oak Cove building to the Flag Building and both the Fort Harrison Hotel and the Oak Cove building will operate solely as overnight accommodation uses. Density: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable density for overnight accommodations within the Downtown Core character district is 95 units per acre; thus the 1.79-acre subject property is permitted 170 overnight accommodation units. However, the development proposal consists of 251 overnight accommodation units, which is 81 units more than allowable. Therefore, the applicant has proposed a transfer of development rights from the property located at 652 Court Street. The development proposals compliance with the criteria for transfers of development rights is discussed later in this staff report. Maximum Building Hei hgt: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, there is no maximum allowable height within the Downtown Core character district. Therefore, the existing 132 foot high building (to top of mechanical equipment enclosure) is in compliance with the Plan. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code, within the Downtown (D) District, off-street parking for overnight accommodations is required to be provided at a rate of one space per unit. Therefore, the proposed 251 overnight accommodation units would require a minimum of 251 parking spaces. However, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, the minimum off-street parking requirement is as determined by the Community Development Coordinator based upon the specific use and/or the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Manual standards. The development proposal includes the provision of 52 off-street parking spaces. As a result, a deviation to the minimum off-street parking requirement has been requested and a "parking need" study has been provided in support of this request. It is noted that subsequent to the provision of this study, the number of rooms and parking spaces proposed were each reduced by one (1). The following is an excerpt from this study (emphasis added): Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 2. The Church operates a shuttle service on a continuous basis to transport parishioners between the hotels and other Church facilities in downtown Clearwater. The Church also provides shuttle service for shopping trips, movies, and recreational activities. Therefore, there is little need for personal automobile use for people staying at their hotels. As a result, many of the parishioners traveling to the Church hotels fly into nearby airports and take Church operated shuttles to the hotel facilities in Clearwater. Due to the unique nature of the Church's operations, standard hotel parking requirements or use of national publications such as the Institute of Transportation Engineers informational report Trip Generation to determine traffic to be generated by the facility would not provide accurate results for the Church specific operation. The parking requirements for the Oak Cove building have been determined for the interim and final uses of this facility. During the interim use, the Oak Cove building will have 252 rooms, of which 127 hotel rooms and 125 rooms totaling 98,076 square feet will be used primarily for counseling area... the hotel rooms will generate the need for 25 parking spaces and the counseling activities will generate the need for 75 spaces, resulting in a total need for 100 parking spaces. The Oak Cove building will have a total of 53 parking spaces. This results in a shortage of 47 parking spaces. These needed spaces will be made up through use of the existing garage in the Fort Harrison Hotel or in the parking structure currently under construction located at 645 Franklin Street. The final use for the Oak Cove building will be to provide 252 hotel rooms. Using the average parking rate developed in this study results in the need for 49 parking spaces. Because 53 spaces will be provided, the ultimate use of the building will have four (4) extra parking spaces. Staff concurs with the findings of the provided "parking need" study that the 52 off-street parking spaces provided with this development proposal will be sufficient for both the interim use and the final use of the Oak Cove building. It is noted that the above referenced parking garage at 645 Franklin Street is to be completed prior to December 31, 2006. Solid Waste Containers and Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view from public streets and abutting properties by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation. The majority of the mechanical equipment for the building exists of ground level between the building and the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. The mechanical equipment consists of two (2) pad-mounted utility transformers, two (2) cooling towers and an emergency generator with fuel tank. The mechanical equipment will be screened by a six-foot (6') high masonry wall with sliding gate access, which is consistent with the above requirement. The appearance of the wall will also be architecturally consistent with the building elevations. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Transfer of Development Rights TDR): Pursuant to Section 4-1402 of the Community Development Code, parcels governed by a redevelopment or special area plan may only receive density/intensity transfers from parcels within the same redevelopment or special area plan. Further, pursuant to the Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 3 • Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, no limitation exists on the amount of density/intensity that may be transferred to a receiving site. The 0.928 acre sending parcel, which is located within the boundaries of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan at 652 Court Street, was recently developed as the 11,500 square foot Church of Scientology Energy Plant. As a result, this parcel has a remaining density/intensity potential of 81.90 overnight accommodation units. The receiving parcel, which is also located within the boundaries of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan at 210 S. Osceola Avenue, will receive 81 overnight accommodation units from the sending parcel. Based upon the above and as expressed in the table below, the proposed TDR has been found to be consistent with the requirements of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market X value of abutting properties; 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; X 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with adjacent land uses; X 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function that enhances the X community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the Citv of Clearwater as a whole. Signage: The applicant has included plans depicting signage with this development proposal. However, these plans are for informational purposes only and the review/approval of said plans shall be accommodated through the sign permit and/or Comprehensive Sign approval processes as necessary. Project Phasing: As stated previously, the development proposal will be completed over two phases. The first phase includes the conversion of the previously approved dormitory use to an interim office/overnight accommodation use. Included with the first phase of development is the construction of all improvements associated with the proposal (i.e.: elevator shaft and lobby additions, porte cochere, elevated deck, off-street parking and architectural elevation changes). The second phase would complete the redevelopment of the subject property to a permanent overnight accommodation use (251 rooms), which would likely involve only minor interior modifications. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, applications for building permit are to be made within one year from the date of the Level Two approval by the CDB, with all required Certificates of Occupancy to be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit. With regard to the proposed interim office/overnight accommodation use the timeframes noted above would apply. However, with regard to the ultimate use as overnight accommodations, it is proposed that an application for building permit would be made within 18 months from the date of the Level Two approval by the CDB, with all required Certificates of Occupancy to be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit associated with this phase. It is noted, and attached as a condition of approval, that the proposed interim office/overnight accommodation use must be interim and cannot become the ultimate use of the property. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 4 • Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that a key component to diversify the Downtown Core is to attract residential uses with a variety of housing types and prices. The Plan further states that once a residential base is in place, retail, restaurant and services will likely follow, and that it is anticipated that the majority of existing churches will remain and possibly expand. Downtown Design Guidelines: The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with regard to various elements associated with new construction in the Downtown. The Guidelines apply to renovations, rehabilitations and additions to existing structures and any site modifications. While existing developments that do not comply with the requirements of the Guidelines shall not be required to be brought into full compliance, any improvements proposed to an existing development, however, will be required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Guidelines related to the improvements. The subject property does not comply with the Design Guidelines; however a review of these Guidelines was conducted as applicable to the proposed improvements and the following items were identified: Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that parking lots adjacent to rights-of-way shall be screened with either a landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. While the location of the off-street parking lot is not being altered with this development proposal, it is being made to comply with those applicable provisions of the Guidelines as best possible. The proposal includes the provision of three-foot (3') high masonry walls with decorative aluminum scrollwork and columns extending above to a total height of four feet-six inches (4'-6"). While the walls cannot extend the full width of the property along South Osceola Avenue due to driveway locations and their associated sight visibility triangles, the walls as provided will suitably screen the vehicles from view of the right-of-way. In addition to the above, the Guidelines state that interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials shall be used for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. While it is not feasible for the entire off- street parking area to be constructed from pavers, brick, etc., the proposal does include decorative stamped concrete at the driveway flares consistent with the balance of the streetscape improvements along the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Pedestrian Circulation/Access: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways shall be provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. The development proposal includes the provision of a paver brick walkway that connects the existing Oak Cove building to the new stamped concrete sidewalk within the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Buffering and Screening: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. The existing building currently has pad-mounted mechanical equipment along the south property line between the building and the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way, as well as an existing refuse collection area located on the north side of the building to the west of the porte cochere. The refuse area is already well integrated into the design of the building and site and no further modifications are necessary in order to achieve compliance with the Guidelines; however the existing mechanical equipment (transformers, cooling tower, and Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 5 • • emergency generator with fuel tank) are not buffered or screened from view. Therefore, the applicant is proposing a six-foot (6') high masonry wall along the north and east sides of the mechanical equipment. The west side of the mechanical equipment will be well screened by the existing building and proposed landscaping, while the south side is currently buffered on the adjacent property by a six-foot (6') high chain link fence and landscaping. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Fences and Walls: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the location, height and design of fences and walls shall be compatible with the intended use, design of the site and architecture of the building. As stated previously, the development proposal includes the provision of masonry walls with decorative aluminum scrollwork and columns (at a height of 4'-6") along the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way to screen the off-street parking lot from view, and a six-foot high masonry wall with sliding gate access around the existing/proposed pad-mounted mechanical equipment along the south property line. The location and heights of these walls are compatible with the design of the site and the architecture of the building. In addition to the above, the Guidelines state that chain link fences are inappropriate within the downtown, and pursuant to Section 3-802.F, chain link fences are tantamount to wire fences. Thus, the proposed six-foot (6') high, black, galvanized wire fence along the majority of the north property line and the entirety of the west property line is not permissible. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that the wire fencing is replaced with fencing permissible within the downtown and complementary to the principle structure with regard to material, texture, size, shape and color (i.e. masonry wall, vinyl fence, etc.). Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition of approval being addressed, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Rh3ghm/Spacing: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". The existing building lacks distinctiveness in all three of these required elements; however the proposed elevations include the incorporation of an enhanced parapet cap, a decorative stringcourse between the second and third levels, and the provision of a lobby addition and porte cochere. These elements, while not necessarily symbolizing the ideal representation of "base", "middle" and "cap", still provide a substantial improvement upon what presently exists and furthers the intent of this Guideline. FaQade Design: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that an architecturally prominent entrance shall be located on the primary fagade and be emphasized through the use of a combination of: protruding front gable or stoop, projection/recession in building footprint, variation in building height, canopy or portico, raised cornice/parapet over door, arches, columns, or other similar treatments that emphasize the primary entrance. As the building exists, the entrance doors are located beneath a nondescript drop-off area. The development proposal includes a lobby and porte cochere addition on the primary fagade that will result in a more architecturally prominent entrance than what presently exists. The entrance incorporates a projection in the building footprint, a variation in building height, a raised parapet and columns consistent with the above. Color: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the number and type of building colors should be appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. The proposed building colors, which are consistent with the colors approved for the Fort Harrison Hotel and the Flag Building, are appropriate for the architectural style of the building. The building base and parapet cap will be pale beige to match the precast concrete elements of the Fort Harrison Hotel and Flag Building. The middle of the building will be light beige (Desert Tan - BM2153-50). Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guideline. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 6 • C? Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the following applicable Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified: ? Vision: Downtown Clearwater is a major center of activity, business and governments. The development proposal involves the adaptive reuse of an existing 13-story building as overnight accommodations while making minor modifications to its architectural elevations and associated off- street parking and landscaped areas. The proposed redevelopment will generate increased pedestrian traffic in the area that should stimulate the surrounding area and further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The development proposal involves the adaptive reuse of an existing 13-story building that is situated toward the middle of the parcel with its associated off-street parking located between the building and the abutting South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. As the existing building and off-street parking are to remain more or less intact, only a moderate amount of improvements are possible that would result in further compliance with the Plan. To this end, the development proposal includes improvements for the screening/buffering of the off-street parking area; the provision of a walkway connecting the building, parking area and sidewalk; and architectural improvements providing for a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap" as well as a more architecturally prominent entrance. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Vision statement. ? Vision: An adequate parking supply must be available coterminous with new uses. As previously discussed under the Minimum Off-Street Parking analysis, the development proposal includes a request to reduce the minimum off-street parking requirement from 251 parking spaces to 52 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a "parking need" study in support of this request, and Staff concurs with the findings of this study that the 52 off-street parking spaces provided with this development proposal will be sufficient for both the interim use and the final use of the Oak Cove building. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this Vision statement. ? Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The ultimate proposed use of the Oak Cove building as 251 overnight accommodations is consistent with those applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Plan, the Downtown Core character district and the Downtown (D) zoning district. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ? Objective 21: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The renovations will improve the pedestrian connectivity between the existing Fort Harrison Hotel and the proposed Oak Cove building as well as making general streetscape improvements within the South Osceola Avenue right-of-way. A new meandering paver brick walkway will connect the Oak Cove building to a new stamped concrete sidewalk along the west side of South Osceola Avenue that is consistent with the existing stamped concrete sidewalk along the east side of the South Osceola Avenue. In addition, a new eight foot wide, paver brick, mid-block crosswalk will be constructed within South Osceola Avenue that will line-up with the aforementioned walkway leading to the Oak Cove building and an existing entrance to the Fort Harrison Hotel. Based upon the above, compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ? Policy 1: The Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. As stated previously, existing development are not required to be brought into full compliance with these Guidelines; however any improvements proposed to an existing development will be required to comply with the applicable provisions of the Guidelines. For those improvements proposed with the Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 7 • redevelopment of the Oak Cove building, positive findings can be made that the improvements will be consistent with the Guidelines with the noted exception that the wire fencing proposed along the majority of the north property line and the entirety of the west property line is replaced with fencing permissible within the downtown and complementary to the principle structure with regard to material, texture, size, shape and color (i.e. masonry wall, vinyl fence, etc.). Based upon the above and subject to the above condition of approval being addressed, the development proposal will be consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. As discussed later in this staff report, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the applicable policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The renovations will improve the pedestrian connectivity between the existing Fort Harrison Hotel and the proposed Oak Cove building as well as making general streetscape improvements within the South Osceola Avenue right- of-way. A new meandering paver brick walkway will connect the Oak Cove building to a new stamped concrete sidewalk along the west side of South Osceola Avenue that is consistent with the existing stamped concrete sidewalk along the east side of the South Osceola Avenue. In addition, a new eight foot wide, paver brick, mid-block crosswalk will be constructed within South Osceola Avenue that will line-up with the aforementioned walkway leading to the Oak Cove building and an existing entrance to the Fort Harrison Hotel. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 13: Places of worship and social/community centers are considered integral parts of the Downtown character districts. They are permitted uses that may locate or expand at a scale consistent with the character district in which they are located provided that all site plan requirements are met. While neither the interim nor ultimate use is a place of worship, the proposed interim office and ultimate overnight accommodation use is directly associated with a place of worship and will effectively operate as part of a larger campus for the place of worship. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. Downtown Core District Policies: A review of the Downtown Core District Policies was conducted and the following applicable Policy was identified: ? Policy 2: Redevelopment on all property west of Osceola Avenue and south of Cleveland Street should consider the natural Bluff features, the views of Clearwater Harbor and be integrated with the Coachman Park Master Plan. While being consistent with the above geographic criteria, the subject property is outside the scope of the Coachman Park Master Plan; thus achieving integration with said Plan is not possible. However, the proposed redevelopment does consider the existing bluff features and views of Clearwater Harbor and will not alter these characteristics. Based upon the above, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with those policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 8 • 0 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Section 2-902 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 95 hotel units per acre 140.23 hotel units per acre X' Building Height 50 feet 132 feet X2 Off-Street Overnight Accommodations - 1.0 per 51 parking spaces X3 Parkin unit 251 parking s aces 1 See above with regard to Density. 2 See above with regard to Maximum Building Height. 3 See above with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-9033 of the Community Development Code (Offices): Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle Avenue, N/A N/A south of Drew Street and north of Court Street; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design N/A N/A and appearance 2. All street frontages are designed and used for commercial purposes. X 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by X1 all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 2, Division 14. 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment X Plan. See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.K of the Community Development Code (Overnight Accommodations): Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle Avenue, N/A N/A south of Drew Street and north of Court Street. b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design N/A N/A and appearance 2. All street frontages are designed and used for commercial purposes. X 3. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by X? all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14. 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Clearwater Downtown Design X Guidelines. See above discussion with regard to Minimum Off-Street Parking Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 9 • a The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect): Consistent Inconsistent I . The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and annronriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 -Page 10 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL ONE AND LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual. acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of November 2, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 1.79 acre subject property is located on the west side of Osceola Avenue between Pierce and Court Streets; 2. That the subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as the subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-903.C, 2- 903.J and 2-903.K of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Transfer of Development Rights criteria as per Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office/overnight accommodations Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 11 • M mixed-use (112,739 square feet) (Phase I) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court Street under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the wire fencing is replaced with fencing permissible within the downtown and complementary to the principle structure with regard to material, texture, size, shape and color (i.e. masonry wall, vinyl fence, etc.); 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all outdoor lighting shall comply with the requirements of Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code; 3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule; 4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, shall be placed underground; 5. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 6. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 7. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 8. That the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be interim and shall not become the ultimate use of the property; 9. That the first building permit for the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be applied for within one year from the date of the Community Development Board approval (by December 19, 2007); 10. That all required Certificates of Occupancy for the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit; 11. That the first building permit for the ultimate overnight accommodation use must be applied for within 18 months of the date of the Community Development Board approved (by June 19, 2008); and 12. That the final Certificate of Occupancy for the ultimate overnight accommodation use must be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Prepared by Planning Department Staff-? Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Future Land Use Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S:0anning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDMOsceola.Ave S 210 - Oak Cove (D) - 12-19-06(RT) IOsceola Ave S 210 - Staff Report 12-19-06.doc Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 12 0 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefftnmyclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. • Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 - Page 13 • • Li Li Li L-i L-j O T SEM W OLE CU is 0 ELDR?GE ST MAPL = Bg®YD MAPLE O LEE ST s PIMA ST GEORGIA a $T •a HPRT 6T IIART K y ICJ JWES ? >? a ??®??0 GRO/E Su ? HENUHK:ICS ? ? LAURA E-1=--DS1 CLEVELAND ? ?'?< PIERCE ST K?j , PIERCE ST ? ?? FRANK= ? LIN ST T GJURT ST a ? ? PROJECT a? , F if 0 - ? ?SITE CHESTNUT ST SR 60 ' ROGERS ST ? ?Su? ROGERS a ? R ? ? ? ?? ? TURNE ? C b prYn :row O PINE PINE ST PINE ST m h ? Gm?.e ? 3 W o RO g DRUID RO W mull) RD ao ??ca JASMINE WAY CMINc 4 . . ??o ??? o MA.cnaw ? ?a? LOTUS PATH LOTUS PATH 1 I ? lLJ ? ? ? JEFFDRDS 5T -.!.?.a!.?MST.-w-.n t r?• •lr• g ? GRANJ CENTRAL ??. w? ?•''.:'.: ': is i..'•• ::: :•': '::e=-': :::•:•:::r: :: :R •• +? PINELLAS Ie •• :? •' ::.6:. ?-A.NWb• r 5 TUSKAWkLA ST : • • . , • • • • ? : . . .T: : •.•.': •:::•: ::.::" . :"::: ?. _ :'. ? Location Map Owners: Church of Scientology Flag Service Case: FLD2006-04019 I Organization TDR2006-11032 Site: 210 S. Osceola Avenue Property 1.79 Size Acres : Atlas 286B Page: PIN: 16-29-15-62131-000-0020 • • ry ? - * Ae .- N-1 kA \ ' r r!1 a fig ? ? rJ ?i a trn 'k ' CIE •?.?,4-A r f. 'w LLB ??? , l ?. • Aerial Map Owners: Church of Scientology Flag Service Case: FLD2006-04019 Organization TDR2006-11032 Site: 210 S. Osceola Avenue Property 1.79 Size Acres : Atlas 2866 Page: PIN: 16-29-15-62131-000-0020 • • --------- - 70 v, A /'? p /? -- - WAT ---CBD---------- ----- 4 YOC7-„ N _ r B ,2 4 „2 --------- - g m ------------------------ 107 13 ---------- a e ?_ 14 WE 5 CBD iv E , N 1507 1.13 Ac ,mae Irr 2.3 Ac O 2,0 CBD 8.84 Ac p V30?5? CBD ,3m, 3 WATER I 1 i ; 1 1 ; 2 I O 1 ;' 2 2 1 O 1 1 2 4 I 1° 1 1 1 1 OURT ST. 2 s 1 1 COD 1 1 2 3 4 W CBD 4 1 3 1 F 420 450 Q 424 'F C D - 1 2 432 -----1 1--------- ; - ;; , 13 Future Land Use Map Owners: Church of Scientology Flag Service Case: FLD2006-04019 Organization TDR2006-11032 Site: 210 S. Osceola Avenue Property 1.79 Size Acres : Atlas 2866 Page: PIN: 16-29-15-62131-000-0020 • ---------- - 10 ti A ---------- N B 12 4 112 g --------------------------------- 107 13 ---------- - 8 14 ----------- - 15 ° PIERCE ST i3 200 , N O 19Po7 1.13 Ac ,ame Q ,3 Q1 MC I Q O 2.3 Ac O 210 U O 8.84 A c (c) O 305 P 1; 2 O 1 1 1 2 2 OI , 2 4 1 300 I COURT ST. I I 2 55 1 I ? 1 I i 1 2 I 1 1 2 I 1 z , 1 °_- -- -°---- 1 ----i ------- - 8 ? I I I I 3 1 4 3 1 4 1 1 3 1 I 420 I , 1 1 --1--- --- 1 1 ' 1 Y 45o O , 424 -- - __----..__-__; ,2 11 1 2 1 432 __-___---13 --__? , --------- F2\ 1 475 I 1 Zoning Map Owners: Church of Scientology Flag Service Case: FLD2006-04019 I Organization TDR2006-11032 Site: 210 S. Osceola Avenue Property 1.79 Size Acres : Atlas 2866 Page: PIN: 16-29-15-62131-000-0020 • • m w J ------------ - ? - - - - - - - - - - - ----'O-- - ------ --- S N X o e __- -_ 11 3 Governmental 112 B 12 ---------- - 3 ------------ qs_ o 7-° 5 Worsffi v ? - - p 15 PIERCE ST w J N !?f ° 2MI acant A Overnight d ti c N 1307 commo a ons 1.13 Ac Bros 13M Q 1301 Q J 210 W 2.3 Ac V 8.84 Ac (c) O 3 13N0 Parki g Garage y ?D 3 ' Clearwater Harbor 1 1 2 4 2 2I? .01 1 ; 1 ,, 1 1 4 1 1 6 -1 1; ; 1 2 1 " 1 300 U- I I 1 1 COURT ST. `? 1 ?2 O 11 1 I 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M 1 2 1 ? 1 2 1 6 ? 1 I I 1 4 ; ? 3 ( e4tal 3 overn„ 420 -1--- _-- Q , i Uses' -------- L------- - L------1 Y 450 O 424 ----------------i F-------- 432 1 I I 2 -+ ---- --------------- 1 ? ------ 475 13 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owners: Church of Scientology Flag Service Case: FLD2006-04019 Organization TDR2006-11032 Site: 210 S. Osceola Avenue Property 1.79 Size Acres : Atlas 2868 Page: PIN: 16-29-15-62131-000-0020 in Looking southwest toward subject property from South Osceola Avenue Lot— 'X \ Nii ?I'iei. -ow _, ..; Looking northwest from interior of subject property a*. r r? 11 111 i Looking south??est lium interior of subject property toward Q Mr-, existing building, pad-mounted mechanical equipment and adjacent property 210 S. Osceola Avenue FLD2006-04019 / TDR2006-11032 Looking southwest from interior of subject property toward adjacent property Looking southwest from interior of subject property MMMMM Looking east from interior of subject property FLORIDA DESIGN CONSUL IANIS, INC. OAK COVE BUILDING Parking Need & Traffic Generation Study Prepared for: Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc. 503 Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Prepared under the supervision of: Roy E. Chapman, P.E. FL P.E. 34438 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 (727) 849-7588 September 11, 2006 •pcm KA0ak Cove\Reports\Parking Requirement & Traffic Generation Study.doc W H ?` 'fyr+ S u O, % i? ?••? ?^"R10 A ' ??4? 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Church of Scientology Religious Trust, Inc. purchased the Oak Cove building, which is located north of Court Street and west of Osceola Avenue in downtown Clearwater. They plan to use the building on an interim basis for a hotel with 252 total rooms, of which 127 hotel rooms and 125 counseling rooms totaling 98,076 square feet (s.f.) would be available. The interim use will remain in effect while the Fort Harrison Hotel is being renovated. All existing hotel and counseling activities in the Fort Harrison Hotel will be suspended while the hotel is renovated. Once the currently unoccupied Flag Building is ready for occupancy, the interim counseling activities at the Oak Cove building will be moved to the Flag Building. Then the Oak Cove building will be remodeled to have 252 hotel rooms. These rooms will be for church members only. This report has been prepared to review two issues for the conversion of the Oak Cove building for church use. First, the review of the on-site parking needs based on use of the building and second, review of the need to complete a Traffic Impact Study for the Oak Cove building. 2.0 CHURCH CLEARWATER OPERATION The Clearwater facilities of the Church of Scientology provide the international advanced religious retreat for this organization. The operation at these facilities includes parishioners traveling to Clearwater to engage in religious training and one to one individual spiritual counseling with Church staff. The services parishioners engage in take place seven days a week and extend into the evening. Therefore, parishioners typically come to a church hotel in downtown Clearwater, attend services, and eat within walking distance of their hotel rooms. ' The Church operates a shuttle service on a continuous basis to transport parishioners between the hotels and other church facilities in downtown Clearwater. The church also provides shuttle service for shopping trips, movies, and recreational activities. Therefore, there is little need for personal automobile use for people staying at their hotels. As a result, many of the parishioners traveling to the church hotels fly into nearby airports and take church operated shuttles to the hotel facilities in Clearwater. The resulting travel patterns are significantly different than occur at typical hotel land uses. This affects the need for on-site parking and motor vehicle trip generation for the church hotels. The City of Clearwater has on-site parking requirements for buildings constructed within the city limits and also has requirement for traffic studies depending on the number of trips expected to be generated. Due to the unique nature of the church's operations, standard hotel parking requirements or use of national publications such as the Institute of Transportation Engineers informational report Trip Generation to determine traffic to be generated by the facility would not provide accurate results for the church specific operation. Therefore, the following studies have been prepared to accurately estimate needed parking and trip generation for the Oak Cove building. ? ,o PARKING ANALYSIS 3.1 EXISTING PARKING USAGE The Church of Scientology has several existing buildings in downtown Clearwater that are used exclusively to serve Church needs. Some of the buildings serve solely as hotels and others chosen for review in this study serve as both a hotel use and provide space for spiritual counseling and religious training. Each of the hotels used in this study have off street parking. The Fort Harrison Hotel provides hotel rooms for parishioners and individual spiritual counseling. The Sandcastle Hotel provides hotel rooms and space for individual counseling as well as courseroom space used for larger groups of parishioners. The Osceola Hotel is used entirely for hotel rooms, however, its parking lot is used for overflow parking for parishioners using the courserooms in the Sandcastle Hotel. The Yachtsman Hotel is used solely as a hotel. On-site counts were taken at the Fort Harrison, Osceola, Sandcastle, and Yachtsman Hotels to identify the number of occupied parking spaces in the parking garage and lots at the following times: 7:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 3:00 p.m., 8:00 p.m., and 11:00 p.m. At the Fort Harrison, Sandcastle, and Osceola Hotels the vehicles were given a sticker to identify if they were there for lodging or counseling. The counts were conducted on July 19, 20, and 22, 2006. In addition the number of occupied rooms and square feet of counseling at each facility was noted for each day. The maximum number of vehicles parked was determined for each day at each facility. A copy of the parked vehicle counts is included in the Appendix. The number of occupied rooms in each hotel was determined for each day the parking counts were taken. The size of the area available for counseling and courseroom was also determined for those facilities included in the study. This information was then used to determine parking rates per room at the hotels and for the size of counseling or counseling plus courseroom per 1,000 s.f for those facilities. At the Fort Harrison Hotel, for example, there were 92 to 96 rooms occupied during the days the counts were taken and the maximum number of cars parked in their garage for hotel use ranged from 14 to 17 vehicles. This results in an average rate of 0.17 vehicle parked for each occupied hotel room. There is 54,000 s.f. of rooms used for counseling in the Fort Harrison Hotel. The maximum number of cars parked in the garage that serviced this operation ranged between 38 and 43 vehicles on the days the counts were taken. This results in an average rate of 0.76 parked vehicles per 1,000 s.f. of counseling space. These calculations are summarized in Table 1. The number of occupied rooms and the maximum number of cars parked were similarly recorded for the days of the counts at the Osceola, Sandcastle and Yachtsman Hotels. The average parking utilization per occupied room was calculated as 0.19 vehicle per hotel room. 2 ? <o The average parking rate for the counseling and courseroom activity at the Sandcastle Hotel was also calculated. As indicated earlier, the Osceola Hotel parking lot is utilized in part for the Sandcastle counseling and courseroom activity. There is 72,762 s.f of space available in the Sandcastle Hotel for counseling and courseroom instruction. The total maximum number of cars parked at the Osceola and Sandcastle Hotels for these activities ranged from 117 to 119 vehicles, which results in a rate of 1.62 parked vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. of counseling and courseroom space. The result of this effort was to calculate parking rates that would be representative of the activities to take place in the Oak Cove building for both its interim and permanent operation. As previously indicated the interim operation of the Oak Cove building will include church hotel operations and individual spiritual counseling. Based on the analysis of existing church facilities in downtown Clearwater it has been determined that the hotel function will generate the need for 0.19 parking space per hotel room. The counseling activity that will occur in the Oak Cove building during interim use, will be the same as currently exists in the Fort Harrison Hotel, which results a parking need of 0.76 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of counseling area. 3.2 PARKING NEEDS FOR OAK COVE BUILDING The parking requirements for the Oak Cove building have been determined for the interim and final uses of this facility. During the interim use, the Oak Cove building will have 252 total rooms, of which 127 hotel rooms and 125 rooms totaling 98,076 s.f. will be used primarily for counseling area. As indicated in Table 2, the hotel rooms will generate the need for 25 parking spaces and the counseling activities will generate the need for 75 spaces, resulting in a total need for 100 off street parking spaces. The Oak Cove building will have a total of 53 parking spaces. This results in a shortage of 47 parking spaces. These needed spaces will be made up through use of the existing garage in the Fort Harrison Hotel or in the parking structure currently under construction located at 645 Franklin Street. The final use for the Oak Cove building will be to provide 252 hotel rooms. Using the average parking rate developed in this study results in the need for 49 parking spaces. Because 53 spaces will be provided, the ultimate use of this building will have four (4) extra parking spaces. TRAFFIC The second part of this study was to review the need to complete a Traffic Impact Study for the land uses to be contained in the Oak Cove building both on an interim use and final use basis. The Fort Harrison Hotel contains both the hotel and counseling activities to be housed on an interim basis in the Oak Cove building. If a traffic study were to be required for the Oak Cove building, it would coincide with the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic. This is the time of highest overall traffic on roadways in downtown Clearwater. 3 The amount of traffic entering and exiting the Fort Harrison Hotel was determined by type of ' trips. To accomplish this, twenty-four hour machine traffic counts were taken at the only entrance to the parking garage in the Fort Harrison Hotel and the amount of hotel and counseling vehicles was determined. The traffic counts identified inbound and outbound traffic by 15 ' minute increments to allow the highest four consecutive 15 minute periods from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. to be identified (the peak hour). ' All entering vehicles stop at a booth when entering the parking garage. The attendant asked each entering driver the purpose of the trips so that the percentage of hotel trips and counseling trips could be identified. The 24-hour counts and patron identification occurred on the same days, ' July 19, 20, and 22, 2006. Copies of the machine and garage counts are provided in the Appendix. From this data, the p.m. peak hour trip generation at the Fort Harrison Hotel was determined. Table 3 identifies the calculation of the hotel and counseling trips by direction. First the inbound ' and outbound p.m. peak hour trips were determined for each day of the count. Next the garage entering count was summarized by hotel or counseling trip and then calculated into percentages. These percentages were then applied to the machine counts to determine the number of inbound ' and outbound trips for the hotel and counseling functions. The Fort Harrison Hotel had an average of 94 rooms occupied solely for hotel use and another 54,000 square feet of hotel rooms used for counseling during the days of the counts. ' The expected number of trips to be generated at the Oak Cove building for the interim and final uses was next calculated. For the interim use, the Oak Cove building will have 127 rooms for hotel use only and an additional 125 rooms (98,076 s.f.) used for counseling space. Hotel traffic on the interim use was determined by dividing the Oak Cove interim hotel rooms by the average Fort Harrison Hotel occupancy on the days of the count multiplied by the Fort Harrison Hotel ' p.m. peak hour number of trips from the study. For the counseling function, the proposed counseling space at Oak Cove was divided by the existing counseling at the Fort Harrison Hotel and multiplied by the counseling trips at the Fort Harrison Hotel. As indicated in Table 3, this ' results in a total of 44 inbound and 42 outbound trips in the p.m. peak hour. Once the Oak Cove building is converted into its final use of 252 rooms of hotel, the projected ' number of trips will drop to 6 inbound and 5 outbound. The number of trips to be generated by the Oak Cove building is so small that a traffic study should not be required. 4 5.0 CONCLUSION This report has examined parking requirements and expected traffic generation in the p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.). The Oak Cove building is proposed to have an ' interim use of hotel and counseling functions and will be converted to full hotel operation as its final use. The expected parking needs and traffic to be generated by both of these conditions has been examined. On an interim basis, there will be a need for 100 parking spaces with 53 being ' provided on site at the Oak Cove building. The 47 parking space shortage can be made up either at the Fort Harrison Hotel, whose rooms will be closed for renovation or at the new parking structure currently under construction. The ultimate use of hotel rooms only at the Oak Cove ' building will generate a need for 49 parking spaces, which will be met by the 53 spaces to be provided on site. ' Trips to be generated by the land uses contained in the Oak Cove building have been estimated. The interim use is expected to generate 44 inbound and 42 outbound trips, while the final use will generate 6 inbound and 5 outbound trips. This amount of trip generation is so small that a ' detailed traffic study should not be required. Church of Scientology Table 1. Existing Parking Conditions Riiddinn• Fort Harrison Hotel Hotel Counseling Date Rooms Occupied Max Cars Parked Area Max Cars Parked 7/19/06 92 16 54,000 42 7/20/06 95 14 54,000 43 7/22/06 96 17 54,000 38 Average 94 16 54,000 41 Av Rate Per Room 0.17 Per 1,000 S q. Ft. 0.76 Ridirfinn• t7srenla Hotel Date Hotel Courserooms + Counseling Rooms Occupied Max Cars Parked Area Max Cars Parked 7/19/06 76 16 27 7/20/06 73 16 32 7/22/06 73 18 36 Average 74 17 Avg Rate Per Room 0.23 Ri d1dinn• Sanrirastle Hotel Date Hotel Courserooms + Couns ling" Rooms Occupied Max Cars Parked Area Max Cars Parked Total Cars Parked 7/19/06 61 16 72,762 91 118 7/20/06 61 20 72,762 87 119 7/22/06 61 16 72,762 81 117 Average 61 17 72,762 118 Avg Rate Per Room 0.28 Per 1,000 S q. Ft. 1.62 Ri dIriinn• Yachtsman Hotel Date Hotel Rooms Occupied Max Cars Parked 7/19/06 33 3 7/20/06 33 4 7/22/06 34 3 Average 33 3 - Avg Rate Per Room 0.10 Pnrkinn Rate Summarv Hotel Rate Location Per Room Fort Harrison Hotel 0.17 Osceola Hotel 0.23 Sandcastle Hotel 0.28 Yachtsman Hotel 0.10 Avera e Parkin Rate 0.19 Osceola Hotel Counseling Parking was for the Sandcastle Facilities. ** Sandcastle Hotel Total Cars Parked includes those from Osceola Hotel. Date: 9/11/2006 T:\2006-0024\[Parking Rate Tables.xls]Parking Rate Table 2. Oak Cove Building Parking Needs Intarim I IqA Hotel Counseling Average Parkin Rate 0.19 0.76 Use 127 Rooms 98,076 S q- Ft- Parking Spaces Re 'd 25 75 Total 100 Planned Parkin Spaces 53 Extra Parkin Spaces -47 Final Use Hotel Average Parkin Rate 0.19 Use 252 Rooms Parkin Spaces Re 'd 49 Planned Parkin Spaces 53 Extra Parkin S aces 4 Note: The extra spaces required in the interim use will be made up from the Fort Harrison Hotel or new parking garage. Date: 9/11/2006 T:\2006-0024\[Parking Rate Tables.xls]Trip Rate Table 3. Average Trip Rate Gnr+ Wnrricnn 14r%fal Machine Count Garage Enterin Count Calculat ed Trips PM Peak Hour 4-6 Hotel Counseling % Hotel % Counseling Hotel Trips Counsel in Trips Date In Out Trips Trips Trips Trips In Out In Out 7/19/06 29 28 2 24 8% 92% 2 2 27 26 7/20/06 35 25 4 26 13% 87% 5 3 30 22 7/22/06 L 11 17 0 11 0% 100% 1 0 0 11 17 verage A 25 23 2 20 93% 2 2 23 22 Oak Cove Building Expected Trip Generation Interim Use Trips Size In Out Total Hotel 127 Rm 3 2 6 Counseling 98,076 SF 41 39 80 Total 44 42 86 Final Use Trips Size In Out Total Hotel 252 Rm 6 5 11 Date: 9/11/2006 T:\2006-0024\[Parking Rate Tables.xls]Trip Rate APPENDIX CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY P D VEHICLE COUNT BUILDING: r%., -TA R F", $ DATE: 6 ?S STAFF PERSON: TIME HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7,? 11 AM 3PM 2-7 8PM 11 PM 3? 4-7( IS s BUILD] DATE: CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY PARKED VEHICLE COUN'? vow? STAFF TIME HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7 AM 7lAt:Z a -z V16 1 11 AM ... 12? VL?l 3PM ? Z 8 PM l 2-f ? ? 2 g 11 PM Z -56 3 t? L1 10 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY PARKED VEHICLE COUXT BUILDING: DATE: STAFF PERSON: (-YJVUU(A 02/IVC&` hZ Deus d?'C TEUE HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CMIS ]AM ?''C I \ 11 AM ?l IS {t \\ `J? 7 J 3PM 3?s' l3 S PM II PM 2,11, J`Pt-. s-s 15? If -1 z ? CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY PARKED VEHICLE COUNT BUILDING: . !?? v , \il V Q - -------- , ll?-- 33 DATE: (c As A STAFF PERSON: 171AM HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7AM 7K- 11 AM "Ilk 3PM 2-+AJ 8PM 11 PM 2 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY PA rDVE ICLE COUNT BUILDING: DATE: ?3 STAFF PERSON: TEWE HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7AM 730 rr 11 AM 3PM 8PM 11 PM ,,:iS I-- 4-Z VAIJ y-? lam( f ? sz? J CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY ?ECLE? PARKED BUILDING: DAB: STAFF PERSON: TiME HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 74q 4lA 2 L 7 ? s- 11 AM 3PM ? 2- ? O 1 _ A s PM 11 PM ? co ..z W 2 l tt i2- 33 3 Z 2g -24 (3 3 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY PAR"D VEHICLE COUNT BUILDING: DATE: STAFF PERSON: TIME HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7AM ?-P 11 AM (DA- 3PM 4-:-5 8 PM ii PM z ? q15 S-I G s'l ?6 ' CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY ' >PARKE;4T ECLE COUNT BUIELDING: ?llll DATE: STAFF PERSON: THE HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7 6A- Z- 4? 11 AM f I z -8? 3 PM 21 8PM 2, 11 PM - Z J s CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY P D VEHICLE COUNT BUILDING: 73 c? _ ?- DATE:? 2:Z, STAFF PERSON: IM14E HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7AM i 11 AM 3PM 8PM 11 PM 3z -?- VVNU 53 4? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY ,PARKED VEHICLE COUNT BUII,DING: 6/ 6,1,(- 5 DATE: STAFF PERSON: THE HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7AM ? j HAM 3PM y? 8PM C 11 PM l ? . n S? 4 Z L,0 C'3 z CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY PARKE VEHICLE COUNT BUILDING: C%!?( DATE: STAFF PERSON: TEVIN HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7AM 11 AM 3PM 8PM 11 PM 11 Sn7 / ti Rk? ??, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY YA PARKED VEHICLE COUNT BUILDING: T-VA 34- -,/// 2 6 ? ? 4- DATE: STAFF PERSON: TIME HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 7AM 11 AM Z 3 PM -?Z 8PM -E- Z s 11 PM 2 10 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FT. HARRISON GARAGE COUNT DATE: 14 STAFF PERSON: 614 Fu rto a.? cj c J TIM SLOT HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 4-4:15 PM 4:15-4:30 PM 4:30--4:45 PM lip 4:45--5 PM j? 5--5:15 PM 5:15--5:30 PM f I 5:30-5:45 PM I I 5:45--6 PM 4i4? 4 X12. 6 q 4 ' CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FT. HARRISON GARAGE COUNT DATE:' STAFF ERSON: ?/ iJ,9V E ?. 5 ON T ME SLOT HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 4--4:15 PM 4:15--4:30 PM 4:30--4:45 PM lilt 4:45--5 PM l? 5--5:15 PM ' 5:15--5:30 PM lilt 5:30--5:45 PM II ( Ij 5:45--6 PM t ( jij CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FT. HARRISON GARAGE COUNT DATE: STAFF PERSON: 1 i (l? vo SDx i ` TEWE SLOT HOTEL CARS COUNSELING CARS 4--4:15 PM f X11 4:15-4:30 PM ? 1 ? 4:30--4:45 PM I 4:45--5 PM / d I 5--5:15 PM ? I 5:15--5:30 PM 5:30-5:45 PM / ? ( l C? 5:45--6 PM V/ a Q? i v N- OL- /rye i Adams Traffic 813-763-7763 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File D07 19001.PRN Station 000 007180602 Identification : 000 178560002 In terval : 15 minutes Start date : Jul 19, 06 St art time : 00:00 Stop date : Jul 19, 06 St op time : 24:00 City/Town : Cle arwater Co unty : Pinellas Location : Ft Harrison Hote l Driveway Jul 19 --------------- ----- Eastbound Volume for ------------------------- Lane 1 ------- --- 0 ul. ---------- ---- ----- --- End Time 00 -------- ---- 01 ---- 02 ---- - 03 --- 04 ---- 05 -- 06 07 08 09 10 -- 11 15 3 3 2 1 0 -- 0 ---- - 0 --- 0 ---- -- 0 -- 0 ---- 4 ---- 4 30 2 5 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 4 3 2 45 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 3 00 3 -------- ---- 1 ---- 0 ---- -- 2 -- 1 -- 0 0 1 2 0 3 2 Hr Total 12 --------------- 12 ----- 5 --------- 3 ---- -- 1 ----- ---- 1 --- ---- - 1 --- 1 ---- -- 4 -- 9 ---- 12 ---- 11 End Time 12 -------- ---- 13 ---- 14 ---- -- 15 -- 16 ---- ---- 17 ---- ------- 18 --- 19 ---------- 20 ---- 21 ----- 22 ----- 23 15 11 9 5 5 2 6 ---- - 4 --- 5 ---- -- 6 -- 5 ---- 7 ---- 3 30 3 6 6 5 10 6 6 7 6 5 4 1 45 5 8 5 6 6 10 6 3 3 7 8 8 00 4 -------- ---- 6 ---- 7 ---- -- 7 -- 6 ---- 6 ---- 3 - 10 7 6 5 3 Hr Total 23 --------------- 29 ----- 23 --------- 23 ---- 24 ----- 28 --- --- - 19 --- 25 ---- -- 22 -- 23 ---- 24 ---- 15 24 Hour Total : 350 ---- -------- -- ---------- ---- ----- ----- AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 19 Peak hour fac tor : 0.43 PM peak hour begins : 13:00 PM peak volume : 29 Peak hour fac tor : 0.81 Jul 19 --------------- ----- Westbound Volume for ------- - Lane 2 Tk) End Time 00 -------- ---- - 01 --- - 02 ---- -- ---- 03 -- ----- 04 ---- ------- 05 -- -------- 06 -- 07 ---------- 08 - ---- 09 ----- 10 ----- 11 15 2 3 1 1 0 -- 0 ---- -- 0 -- 1 -- - -- 1 -- 5 ---- 6 ---- 4 30 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 7 3 4 45 3 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 4 2 3 00 3 -------- ---- - 0 --- 0 ---- -- 1 -- - 0 --- 0 --- 0 3 4 3 5 7 Hr Total 10 ---------------- 7 ---- 2 --------- 2 ----- 1 ----- - 1 ----- ---- -- 1 -- 4 ---- -- 11 -- 19 ---- 16 ---- 18 End Time 12 -------- ---- - 13 --- 14 ---- -- 15 -- - 16 --- - 17 ---- - -------- 18 - -- 19 ---------- 20 ---- 21 ----- 22 ----- 23 15 6 12 2 7 5 8 -- -- 8 -- 3 ---- -- 7 -- 2 ---- 5 ---- 5 30 11 4 3 5 4 4 8 4 5 3 3 3 45 5 12 7 7 6 4 6 7 4 5 4 4 00 4 -------- ---- - 6 --- 9 ---- -- 7 -- - 13 --- 5 --- 9 4 3 3 6 4 Hr Total 26 ---------------- 34 ---- 21 --------- 26 ----- 28 ----- - - 21 - --- -- 31 -- 18 ---- -- 19 -- 13 ---- 18 ---- 16 24 Hour Total 363 - ----- ------- -- ---------- ---- ----- ----- AM peak hour begins 11:30 AM peak volume : 27 Peak hour fac tor 0.61 PM peak hour begins 13:00 PM peak volume : 34 Peak hour fac tor 0.71 Adams Traffic 813-763-7-/63 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 Data File D0719001.PRN Station 000007180602 Identification : 000178560002 Interval 15 minutes Start date : Jul 19, 06 Start time 00:00 Stop date : Jul 19, 06 Stop time 24:00 City/Town : Clearwater County Pinellas Location : Ft Harrison Hotel Driveway Jul 19 --------------- Total Volume ----------------- for All Lanes End Time 00 -------- ---- ------ 01 02 03 04 ---- ---- ---- ---- ----------------- 05 06 07 - ---------- 08 ----- 09 ---- 10 ----- 11 15 5 6 3 2 0 --- ---- ---- 0 0 1 ---- -- 1 -- - 5 --- 10 ---- 8 30 4 5 2 0 0 2 2 0 5 11 6 6 45 7 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 9 4 6 00 6 -------- ---- - 1 0 3 1 --- ---- ---- ---- 0 0 4 --- 6 3 8 9 Hr Total 22 ---------------- 19 7 5 2 ---------------------- - ---- ---- 2 2 5 ---- -- 15 -- - 28 --- 28 ---- 29 End Time 12 -------- ---- - - 13 14 15 16 --- ---- ---- ---- ----------------- 17 18 19 - --------- 20 ----- 21 ---- 22 ----- 23 15 17 21 7 12 7 --- ---- ---- 14 12 8 ---- -- 13 -- - 7 --- 12 ---- 8 30 14 10 9 10 14 10 14 11 11 8 7 4 45 10 20 12 13 12 14 12 10 7 12 12 12 00 8 -------- ---- - 12 16 14 19 --- ---- ---- ---- 11 12 14 10 9 11 7 Hr Total 49 ---------------- 63 44 49 52 ----------------------- ---- ---- ---- 49 50 43 -- ---- -- 41 -- - 36 --- 42 ---- 31 24 Hour Total : 713 --------------- --------- ----- ---- ----- AM peak hour begins : 11:30 AM peak volume : 46 Peak hour factor : 0.68 PM peak hour begins : 13:00 PM peak volume 63 Peak hour factor : 0.75 Adams Traffic 813-763-7763 Volume Report with 24 Hour.Totals Page 1 Data File D07 20001.PRN Station 000 007180602 Identification 000 178560002 In terval : 15 minutes Start date Jul 20, 06 St art time : 00:00 Stop date Jul 20, 06 St op time : 24:00 City/Town Cle arwater Co unty : Pinellas Location Ft Harrison Hote l Driveway Jul 20 ---------------- ---- East --------- bound Volume for ---------------- Lane 1 -------- puk ------------ ---- ----- ----- End Time 00 -------- ---- - 01 --- 02 ---- -- 03 -- 04 ---- 05 - 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 4 6 0 1 0 --- 0 ---- -- 0 -- 0 ---- -- 1 -- 0 ---- 3 ---- 7 30 5 4 4 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 10 45 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 5 4 6 00 1 -------- ---- - 2 --- 0 ---= -- 1 -- 0 ---- 0 - 0 2 5 2 3 5 Hr Total 11 ---------------- 13 ---- 6 --------- 3 ---- 1 ----- --- 0 - ---- -- 1 -- 2 ---- -- 9 -- 9 ---- 15 ---- 28 End Time 12 -------- ---- - 13 --- 14 ---- -- 15 -- 16 ---- ------ 17 -------- 18 --- 19 --------- 20 ---- 21 ----- 22 ----- 23 15 6 7 4 6 3 ---- 6 ---- -- 7 -- 4 ---- -- 9 -- 14 ---- 1 ---- 11 30 3 9 5 5 9 8 8 5 4 4 10 5 45 7 6 4 5 5 7 5 5 5 8 5 7 00 4 -------- ---- - 2 --- 5 ---- -- 4 -- 4 ---- 4 8 4 9 5 12 4 Hr Total 20 ---------------- 24 ---- 18 --------- 20 ---- 21 ----- ---- 25 - ---- -- 28 -- 18 ---- -- 27 -- 31 ---- 28 ---- 27 24 Hour Total : 385 ------ -------- --- --------- ---- ----- ----- AM peak hour begins : 11:00 AM peak volume : 28 Peak hour fac tor : 0.70 PM peak hour begins : 22:15 PM peak volume : 38 Peak hour fac tor : 0.79 Jul 20 ---------------- ---- West --------- bound Volume for ---------------- Lane 2 -------- Y --- --------- --- End Time 00 -------- ---- - 01 --- 02 ---- -- 03 -- 04 ---- 05 --- 06 07 08 - 09 ----- 10 ----- 11 15 0 7 1 0 0 - 0 ---- -- 0 -- 1 ---- -- 1 -- 5 ---- 5 ---- 6 30 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 4 12 6 7 45 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 3 2 7 00 0 -------- ---- - 0 --- 0 ---- -- 1 -- 0 0 0 4 5 9 6 7 Hr Total 4 ---------------- 10 ---- 4 --------- 2 ---- ---- 1 ----- ---- 0 ---- -- 1 -- 7 ---- -- 12 -- 29 ---- 19 ---- 27 End Time 12 -------- ---- - 13 --- 14 ---- -- 15 -- - 16 ---- ------ 17 ---- -------- 18 --- 19 --------- 20 ---- 21 ----- 22 ----- 23 15 7 5 5 2 3 3 ---- -- 8 -- 6 ---- -- 7 -- 14 ---- 4 ---- 4 30 6 6 7 4 6 11 5 3 3 7 4 3 45 7 10 4 4 5 12 8 6 3 4 3 3 00 5 -------- ---- - 3 --- 10 ---- -- 3 -- 9 ---- 13 --- 5 2 16 4 2 0 Hr Total 25 ---------------- 24 ---- 26 --------- 13 --- - 23 - - 39 ---- -- 26 -- 17 ---- -- 29 -- 29 ---- 13 ---- 10 24 Hour Total : 390 - ---- ------ -------- --- --------- ---- ----- ----- AM peak hour begins : 09:00 AM peak volume 29 Peak hour fac tor 0.60 PM peak hour begins : 17:15 PM peak volume 44 Peak hour fac tor 0.85 Adams Traffic 813-763-7763 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 2 Data File : D0720001.PRN Station : 000007180602 Identification : 000178560002 Interval : 15 minut es Start date : Jul 20, 06 Start time : 00:00 Stop date : Jul 20, 06 Stop time : 24:00 City/Town : Clearwater County : Pinellas Location : Ft Harrison Hotel Driveway Jul 20 ---------------- Tot ------------- al Volume -- for All Lanes End Time 00 -------- ---- - 01 02 --- ---- -- ------- 03 04 -- ---- ----------------- 05 06 07 ---- - ---------- 08 ---- 09 ----- 10 ----- 11 15 4 13 1 1 0 --- ---- 0 0 1 ---- -- 2 -- 5 ---- 8 ---- 13 30 9 6 6 2 0 0 0 1 6 14 11 17 45 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 1 3 8 6 13 00 1 -------- ---- - 2 0 --- ---- -- 2 0 -- ---- 0 0 6 -- 10 11 9 12 Hr Total 15 ---------------- 23 10 ------------- 5 2 ---------- -- ---- ---- 0 2 9 ---- ---- -- 21 -- 38 ---- 34 ---- 55 End Time 12 -------- ---- - 13 14 --- ---- -- 15 16 -- ---- ------------- 17 18 19 ---- --------- 20 ---- 21 ----- 22 ----- 23 15 13 12 9 8 6 ---- ---- 9 15 10 ---- -- 16 -- 28 ---- 5 ---- 15 30 9 15 12 9 15 19 13 8 7 11 14 8 45 14 16 8 9 10 19 13 11 8 12 '8 10 00 9 -------- ---- - 5 15 --- ---- -- 7 13 -- ---- 17 13 6 --- 25 9 14 4 Hr Total 45 ---------------- 48 44 ------------- 33 44 ---------- - ---- ---- 64 54 35 ---- ---- -- 56 -- 60 ---- 41 ---- 37 24 Hour Total 775 ------------- --------- ---- ----- ----- AM peak hour begins 11:00 AM peak volume 55 Peak hour fac tor : 0.81 PM peak hour begins 20:45 PM peak volume 76 Peak hour fac tor 0.68 ***************************** ************************************ **** ***** ***** Adams Traffic 813-763-7763 Volume Report with 24 Hour Totals Page 1 Data File D07 22001.PRN Station 000 007180602 Identification 000 178560002 In terval 15 minut es Start date Jul 22, 06 St art time 00:00 Stop date Jul 22, 06 St op time 24:00 City/Town Cle arwater Co unty Pinellas Location Ft Harrison Hotel Driveway Jul 22 ---------- ------ ---- East --------- bound ----- Volume for ----------- Lane 1 -------- -- C),.v ---------- ---- ----- ----- End Time 00 - 01 --- 02 ---- -- 03 -- - 04 --- 05 -- 06 07 08 09 10 11 -------- - 15 --- 4 4 2 0 0 -- 0 ---- -- 0 -- 2 ---- -- 0 -- 0 ---- 6 ---- 5 30 14 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 5 3 45 10 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 2 3 00 9 1 1 ---- -- 1 -- - 0 --- 0 -- - 0 0 2 1 6 2 -------- - Hr Total --- 37 ---- 9 7 1 1 - 0 ---- -- 2 -- 2 ---- -- 3 -- 5 ---- 19 ---- 13 ---------- End Time ----- 12 ----- 13 --------- 14 - - ----- 15 ---- 16 ------- 17 -------- 18 -- 19 ---------- 20 ---- 21 ----- 22 ----- 23 -------- - 15 --- 9 ---- 5 -- - - 6 -- - 3 --- 4 ---- 3 ---- -- 5 -- 12 ---- -- 7 -- 9 ---- 7 ---- 11 30 4 5 4 9 2 4 3 2 1 4 9 5 45 3 5 3 10 5 6 7 10 2 11 5 2 00 4 7 8 4 - 4 2 5 6 4 3 2 2 -------- - Hr Total --- 20 ---- 22 ----- ---- -- 21 --------- - - 26 ----- --- 15 ---- ---- 15 ------- ---- -- 20 -- 30 ---- -- 14 -- 27 ---- 23 ---- 20 --------------- 24 Hour Total : 352 -------- -- ---------- ---- ----- ----- AM peak hour begins : 00:00 AM peak volume 37 Peak hour fac tor 0.66 PM peak hour begins : 14:45 PM peak volume 30 Peak hour fac tor 0.75 Jul 22 West ------ bound ---- Volume for Lane 2 10 ---------- End Time ----- 00 ----- 01 --- 02 - -- - 03 -- ---- 04 - ------- 05 -------- 06 -- 07 ---------- 08 ---- 09 ----- 10 ----- 11 -------- - 15 --- 6 ---- 4 --- 1 - 1 -- 0 ---- 0 ---- -- 0 -- 0 ---- -- 0 -- 3 ---- 2 ---- 6 30 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 3 3 45 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 8 4 -------- - Hr Total --- 17 ---- 6 ---- -- 5 ---- -- - 1 -- --- 1 ---- 0 ---- -- 1 -- 1 ---- -- 3 -- 21 ---- 14 ---- 17 ---------- End Time ----- 12 ----- 13 ---- - 14 --- -- --- 15 -- - ---- 16 --- ------- 17 - -------- 18 -- 19 ---------- 20 ---- 21 ----- 22 ----- 23 -------- - 15 --- 4 ---- 4 - 3 4 6 --- 2 ---- -- 9 -- 8 ---- -- 4 -- 6 ---- 3 ---- 3 30 11 3 5 5 5 4 1 4 4 9 3 3 45 12 3 5 6 3 4 7 4 2 12 5 1 00 9 7 --- 4 ---- -- 8 -- - 1 --- 6 ---- 5 ---- 6 2 9 2 2 ---- -------- - Hr Total --- 36 - 17 17 -------- 23 ----- 15 --- 16 -- 22 -- 22 ---- -- 12 -- 36 ---- 13 9 --------------- 24 Hour Total ----- - 325 -- ------ -------- -- ---------- ---- ----- ----- AM peak hour begins 11:30 AM peak volume 23 Peak hour fac tor : 0.48 PM peak hour begins 12:00 PM peak volume 36 Peak hour fac tor : 0.75 • a low- Oak Cove West Elevation , Fuegel Planning Services 1424 Court St., #3 Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-446-2848 Fax: 727-442-3216 f ps 0 sunlink.net 0 iN - 1QO,SF-; Owner: Project: Date: Church of Scientology Fl S O i t i Oak COVC Nov. 16, 2006 erv ion ag ce rgan za Scale: 319 S. Garden Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Redevelopment N/A tel 727-467-6583 fac 727-445-7277 & Interim Use Sheet: CMU FEN 210 South Osceola Avenue A-0 Clearwater, Florida 33755 • L ILI' -M-WW-W?W- • • ? I I I I ?? WCK ,? 1GENERATOR i ------------------------ 1 Partial Site Plan N A-1 i" = 30'-0n Fuegel wner: Project: Date: l hurch of Scientology i ti l S i O Oak Cove Nov. 16, 2006 anning P erv rgan za on ag ce Scale: Services [3l19 S. Garden Ave. earwater, FL 33756 Redevelopment '_ 30 0 1424 Court St., #3 tel tel 727-467-6583 ac 727-445 7277 & Interim Use Sheet: Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-446-2848 ® P titi N 210 South Osceola Avenue A-1 Fax: 727-442-3216 on ew ar Rear Lanai Clearwater, Florida 33755 fps@sunlink.net • • Fence No. 1 16' II"-4' I6' 14. -4' Plan View 3/16" = 1'-0" # 161 61 4f - Ld -d -d - ' O d- ? Elevation A-21 3/16" = 1'-0" Fuegel Planning Services 1424 Court St., #3 Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-446-2848 Fax: 727-442-3216 fps 0 sunlink.net Owner: Project: Date: Church of Scientology i t i O Oak Cove Nov. 16, 2006 za ion Flag Serv ce rgan Scale: 319 S. Garden Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Redevelopment 3/16" - 1'-0" tel 727-467-6583 fac 727-445-7277 & Interim Use Sheet: CMU FENCE 210 South Osceola Avenue A-2 SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS Clearwater, Florida 33755 • 16' 15"-4' I6' 1 Elevation r? Fence No. 2 A-31 3/16° = 1'-0" Fuegel Planning Services 1424 Court St., #3 Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-446-2848 Fax: 727-442-3216 fps@sunlink.net Owner: Project: Date: Church of Scientology S i O i t Fl Oak Cove Nov. 16, 2006 erv ag ce rgan za ion Scale: 319 S. Garden Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Redevelopment 3/16° - 1'-0" tel 727-467-6583 fac 727-445-7277 Interim Use Sheet: CMU FENCE 210 South Osceola Avenue ??? SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS Clearwater, Florida 33755 • Fence No. 3 j ------------------------------------- --??----- i -L? 18'-4' 1 Plan View L.4 3/16" = 1'-0'. bT. Elevation M A-4] 3/16" = 1'-0" Fuegel Planning Services 1424 Court St., #3 Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-446-2848 Fax: 727-442-3216 fps@sunlink.net Owner: Project: Church oP Scientology i O i t Fl S pak Cove erv ce rgan za ion ag 319 S. Garden Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Redevelopment tel 727-467-6583 fac 727-445-7277 & Interim Use [E] CMU FENCE 210 South Osceola Avenue SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS Clearwater, Florida 33755 • • Fence No. 4 0 2 A-5 ?I o Elevation 0 3/32" = 1'-0" Fuegel Planning Services 1424 Court St., #3 Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-446-2848 Fax: 727-442-3216 fps 0 sunlink.net Owner: Church of Scientology FlagSService Organization 319 . Garden Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 tel 727-467-6583 fac 727-445-7277 CMU FENCE SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS Project: Oak Cove Redevelopment & Interim Use 210 South Osceola Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33755 Da te: Nov. 16, 2006 Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" Sheet: A-5 i Plan View ? A-5 3/32" = 1'-0" N ? r. - ,,,TTT 100 x w4f v £ f E "T` DOM mn i 4k OMEGA V panel' : OMEGA 5' panel Architectural «. p" S&d"onvpP" Architectural XftH .ew 1.98' 1' 1.96" 6 gauge galvanized (50 mm) (25.4 mm) 6 gauge galvanized (50 mm) (25.4 mm 6' 6" (152.4 mm) . mm), 49' ICI (1244.6 mm) I it ft 11,111,111,11illimmil , (1549.4 mm) Coo 3- (76.2 mm) (17 Note: All MA Ivantted and welded at IMarsectlona, than polyester Powder m W (241 .8' 152.4 3" (76.2 1 o 92 3/4' (2356 mm) Note: AN wires am goNarbed and welded at kdersecdons, then p*es*powder coated after fatxiWW OMEGA 8' panel Architectural ca I o° m'°'°""' °°. 1. (25.4 mm) 4 mm) 3" r (76.2 mm) 6' (152.4 mm) 3" (76.2 mm) 0 92 (2356 mm) Note: All wires are'gaNaotzed and welded at Named". then pofyeeter powder coated after faWk- '.: n Tel: 450-686-9600 8W-836-6342 Fax: 450=681-5318 OMLZ a www.om@gafence.com fl3BEilSTglfi Stepping for Profile and square post installation Stair Slope Make sure that the head of the post is at the highest height Omega Profile posts can be stepped in 3-inch f (76mm) increments for installation on uneven ground N t + c L c c a a 4' (1219mm) or as required -. in your region -1110- 8" (200mm) V r Profile post installation 2" or 3" Square post installation For square Posm Universal brackets allow for easy adjustments to desired heights. Installation on accidented land Tel: 450-686-9600 N D 800-836-6342 Fax: 450-681-5318 omega 1"I CO o - www ornegafence,com rcNanc W cn OUTFAIL PIPE CAPACITY C A L V A R V B A P, T S T C H U R C H 56LF-16" flCP . 0.5z SLOPE TO NEW Nr .PN y' CAPACR! OCFS FLOa'IN11 FULL. 25 YGR pp ft PLgg pEVE C1, To Cwd0? 11.]..)P Pl.z= `f. S 89'15'39 E (P) 590 00• (P) ON Ixa"il ( 595.93' (M) ;;; +.1 r , iT.-i S 49'14$6 1Nx ?ixl - , a u n n •cr A • I - -p ---------- J•'r•1-r,v ? 32.2 O .x, .. a u. w.... * (M _ ! •?nwn Al 1c G flYP.Ja'y ?' e.o + x4rP ---- A' 9 ee A YR U' s _ r? wwa 5y. r - --. ._---- - s] r G ] .?_ Ir t I I ?,.m .n.R S[ RE°'E" c` 60 .vFlr>p I.- 01]- o H a WASTE NAND""UNG m'..ci,R?"°m" o °? Mme- ..., t I T I 1- 40, -- -------------- a 7- *R a' ?ELEOV.DyA, IUILRAIG MEA.145e13.F. - ; 0 -qS•.a :• r- 1 ?o? .. r,., .rc, . ? - .a, aR sm•, . " 4 - I 1? iYY. $ 'kJ 'il ? - ? .. m Ole w Y 9P° '.t I ='f3 c}];?I,• Nv z1 ss« ..9, a„ •r 1r -- v`'i i?a x? 3 8 J._.... P Ic _ 1Z uw +r o 3, g c GA I, '1 reo n.;?,aK,J r .. ?+ FK c w.n uvv vela JG L v 5 89-34'00- W (P k M) v571 70 lP) 572' S' ( ) w v I. RarR rue aT.LU 3;,?_ 1? i ??NC ,?+ J P I N cYL A S 0 0 0 N T Y ,. + '?' PC M1 ?'D fie" v? ALEVELPARKING > IK.E Ftwen.J? 0 r . _ -' .e rte.' fa creAMA i4 1 I I 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 '? 1.1 - - , ? ? I I 1- - -- LIFE SAFETY PLAN N.T.S. FIRE PROTECTR2N NOTES: KNOK KEY 00x 10 NE K-LEO FOR ENDIGENll ACCESS -.11 WTE PRIOR TO -LONG - INSI•ECIICN. LOCATION W Crv FIRE INSPECTOR. - INSTALL A NEw l10 PARKING. fIHF. APMEM CONNEONON• SIGNS . OM1J ON PLV1. TRAFFIC SIGN_ SCHEDULE ?? DESCPPPON i?? CWN1ItY a-b SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE NO. STRIICNNE 1,'PE 104 REV. M'. REV. 10 d.. ? 1? ]OrJ J1.4 a a © d pO?IJai ]arJ U ' ® i _ SANITARY SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE DNS DT) 9n m RP[ SLOPE (J-© I I.a K do 7130 O.4 ©-03 IJ'v a pP CL50 0.5 0.5 lo)-ol ex -p- I ? T. `°°.. m?I Tai ? °?°.k°q s'u? ? ? i Du]eloe: ?«•°"'" -- pf '£ - lm :ae.uc°sso. 2LEVEL -KING ,fPIN L L L A S 000N 1 Y Ya 'a^ n=^'-'^ ' P A R K I N G GA R GE I ilA1L0e •Cp+1AFNiJ r ? 4REUN1ur,m sEr O I ®4WN11iNOR, ?„ - 0 co•6mUC ON sF1 18.29939 -- I SE C +? e"•.. E?X 9.5• "'« PINELLAS COUNTY (n ?J? PINELLAS COUNTY ?y PARKING GARAGE DETAIL A N.T.S LEGEND LLLLLL L fo NEW BUILD. ADD. NEW PAVER BRICK NEW TURF BLOCK w FUTURE ELEVATION DECK NEW SCORED CONCRETE xr. sn 4AJKIw Aw caws m -1 20--1 1-2.1 OAK: REDEVELO ENT & INTERIM OFFICE USE 210 SOUTH OSCEOLA AV. CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33755 pe*•'hJ RKe SURVEY DATUM NGVD 1529 GRADING, STAKING 6 SCALE: I'-2(r UTILITIES SITE PLAN ?? L1wly N.nNn 20 0 10 20 AO C3.1 p -OK 2 2 (3 . _ a1y _ I 1 f' O ? ?AY7.'CiR: RE RrAao Lw L-.I..w ao'? 1 ,• I U WIPE plp lle'SEl'c6?.""' E o? ,`? pa1.e ?? ca a°CAy p?? 7 k o 5 ??. 3 L4°( A P??v w w.Tr I iG a i a74 -- -}11 064?9 .. Ji, •R,D'...... . Vv Fr, AZ `3F la L w .ccoPNNCE wj"rnrrco uics='cmnu ..? °? OUTFALL PIPE CAPACITY '•. V A P. A P 7! c T C H IJ R C H. -1 TI -A -, 89"5 TD EI(R) e 9 cf. Pj ? _ ? ? uJi ., 7.+ . . F,EVnW 11' R.o. Fu yy __ _ Fod # DECK r ` vu o[n or nr t ----------------------- LID WASTE NANDI SO ING )1 S ? Vcu 11 JI Sk V ?yJ_BM1YS ?tiCgva?.?_- SIO EK.iJ BTDRY CONGGMINN FLOGq ELEV..JJ.IJ MBURGRIG < \\., ,F.i_' AREA. I?.SB1l F. Ip lar Y` ?? YYY re. T ? - 0 - 11,3 T c ' I lI0 ?i V/ ! P R[ M ? J JO }F 1.. I :1 It I'?o ec,Fn3cn pM % ye,•t ALEVEL PARKING eaR[,Kw w,•w„ (PARKING El 11 I e ae.,w.,ER. A p (S E i,. I J*x _IFE SAFETY PLAN 9SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE FIRE PROTECTION NOTES: LTZ c c --.c loR ?T -E R 9 3 u C R S ErGR. I'Al TRAFFIC SIGN SCHEDULE nrx 1 %•tF s• ou iwx za, , " " ? xx Izoz zn 'z• xe.,z c C4) SANITARY SEWER PIPE SCHEDULE •E Ifp LtE (N) ?N. t- c?-c? a .N O3 (3 uB SURVEY DATUM NGVD 1929 GRADING, STAKING 8 SCALE: T?20' UTILITIES SITE PLAN 11 10 41 C3.1 e?- ilk _. J .R. ?Y2v P IN EL LAS 0 U N T. PARKING GARAGE DETAIL A 0 0 a o O o _ > gpo 2 V E L ? U 5 U 1 A w?F$ 1 ryy ?r ?In[ FI CE q GJ 6? G 5 5 tl ,g W j ? xN? O?,t, 18-293 pI5E LEGEND OAK jL LI :LL , LL REDEVELO ENT : LLLLLLL_L-l L r y 11 INTERIM ?L v OFFICE USE NEW BUE_D. ADO. _ ?A VER PRICK NEW TUR= BLOCK IT. ? q ir ry 210S v,ar.SOUUT T. H ,? y ?\?7 mm1 ' ? OSCE A AV. FUTLR,E ELEVATION DECK NEW SCORED CONCRETE ' ,!?\?\\\\?Y j W CLEARWATER I lo* FLORIDA 33755 T.s 1" 0 11 i= IEVATEO: uT-1 l_ _el __' <i= N y,? m.xarwal 2, f -- _ •T?AE _ ' y- ?i .'1 \? r -?' ' 1 ?"' b 5- ' _ - P•5 \ - v? V{ ? ? ? I G, L_ _ t?wrfrirS 32 ? ` L ? n e -att I n F m? ttt ss I _ 1210, FLOOR EU.?OLULgNO •••? -??.?-__ ?_-? 1 ??L.. `"'^ _ _ ... ,. - I EN<R. a T9[coaD 3 ? AEEA.145M i.R. -- - - 5A '1 ? d ?? U .JI z3 ' . ] ] to k=-'. /?c .t _,y z 6ggq ??_ ? ? e%J '3 ,mx UV ? • - ? yf .•1 r? ? WSEF ?0 V ' naVAr? LA 4 EE" (E? O,6• _? •zar ,..SY.°.. QI '' '_ 9 1 ° ?+ ?TF ' _ a u R..AU EA, P x _ a wrap Fv M <M1 TE ?`?. ?E_z IF V' k tO t{N . 'R:9.5 ? I °S .f+ mR 0 ?p .. W .. TREE, PALM 8 9HR119 PLAIiiItIGNOT€S (M+R[xMPxIF?) n?MUM ?4 ntt 'fie ,r. M./rM oxN ?mv[o mESawux[5 ° rF- xmxa[rNE4 ! TREE REMOVAL CALCULATION 'I"- 1 ?ALMS TO OE 1-M-1/NEP l - 2J I ONES OF tREES TO K REUOVED/REPLAMD 61' TOTAL 64 TO DE ft=PU.CED - - 25 - TREES REOUIREO PRC1- • 32 TREES MD 23 PALMS. LAND CAP( NOTE: PAVED KMCULa9 ']SE NiE.\ 25,949 S.F. AM1IH NTERD9 pNDSOME COVERACEw 03 0% PVA - 2.893 S.F. I I TEP OR UNDSCOPE ?0\'JFL S]9 S J 67f IRRIGATION NOTES -xc urw N.s aH[[a I 91E .. R .T. ,ra a• Rx,.?. . w I x 5[.rsq/ux ar oLKE ro nm =T=w Inv. ,zr Sr - -11 -- wNE [nwGN vun 12 ?. m.x .M :.Rx. .xx Is .'4'y? n.e.ne enEO v.ur I?Am"?]e o.c .xr.. 9A= a(3 'w t ? • - - - i ??. wswk•A ?lxl%c'??c' r:. ? 3? IC?/? ....-.rn-. aSrK }•PQt Wv. .an R M. ORCRATIDx, SPECPxal - OU/fir EwSI'NG LANpSCAPE NAZ CR6V9 SEE TREExfORY RFPORI',OPREPNEO Or: CF'UCN BURR. CERTNED nRBORST T2 /R-12J9A CAI 11 5! V?OIrtNO P121 RORM ]list PH. 7 5•t- SOR] vP_uMNAaI]R rtRVRnvn Sf+ ? «?-?,m?x.Et 15.295.15E PINELLAS, COUNTY U HANDICAPPED.TALL DETAIL HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL ---- - = t. - - -- --------- ------ -- -- OAK CO 1 y.,rr t`=:%.: c.° REDEVELOPMENT & INTERIM OFFICE USE 210 SOUTH •?? ?. •.? ft^Lxr OSCEOLA AV. ?,:•str•? :.?.:.?.y r?xa CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33755 TREE STAMNO L PLANTING DETAIL ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT TREE 97AKMG LPLAMTMO DETAIL PALM STANMO (RANTING DETAIL SHRUL PLANTING DETAIL Rr4-? Da.rv u LANDSCAPE A : SCALE: 1-20' SITE PLAN ' 26 L1.1 PIN Fi IAS COUN - Y I .?. 2 LEVEL PARKING A LEVEL PARKING P I N_ L L A S 0 0 0 N' Y PAR < N G G A R A G E a;r r1Axs r+c E RENwxs ouNnrr ..,..a,,.n ?w.nr Fb 1 TREE. PALM 8 SHRUB PLANTING NOTES "ye Y TREE REMOVAL CALCULATION ni+E 'EC - - -EE: ". Bc aEMC-.F.r,rBEPIq_ED - E<', ?_PIA ' - '- ?'JC - - 25 nE4 !PEGS REOUIPE]I ' - ?raEF_.V LM6_ I -LANDSCAPING NGTE E f_ 99 0 R 1S 0 P ? 2.895 i.F IRRIGATION NOTES ?.. 5 i -, I_+ LEC.?vo m ... couunn vPN R s . vw. w •.no e.x. d , a. +..xne vw owr gwr«?u "_V O 5 U.NOGCA^E EEc EE AM!H7m PORI -P- "T' 'T 111TI, 11 -1. oaw mEI 11' 1-144 4" 2 LEVEL PARKING HANDICAPPED STALL oDETAIL HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL ? o R°M,\ x , er 16' 29S • 15E PINELLAS COUNTY OAK COVE" REDEVELOPMENT 81NTERIM { x-, ? ar OFFICE USE 210 SOUTH OSCEOLA AV :..?? - I °?a' Y. CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33755 TREE STAKING 6 PLANTING MAIL ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT TREE STAKING t PLANTING DETAIL PALM STAKING A PLANTING DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL - --- - LANDSCAPE '-- -' SCALE 1"-20' : SITE PLAN --- 20 _ •° L 1.1 W 4TED I 1 - L l 1, BTGRy FLOaRCOit°gY.j MSI'Aona f, AREA. t/,BEt t.F. y - ,-? -, .. . C - _ Q 31 wF,(w9 nAU E.. • v..n EE'+c£ rnRn!n 1 / LEVEL PARKING I t - f? O (j a V 4 ? < 4 ) U O I n ? v sE l_ i L y z I e, I ? r ? f _? r EQ ti N 0 AE d F?I N'u? 04/20106 KR 06-09 Oak Cove North Elevation w 1J Oak Cove South Elevation • Oak Cove East Elevation • V V. ?k ..:c5 Y ^' i ? ?. lG1f`f'P f•. 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPAwi mEwri CITY OF CLEARWATP,', M31naad N0100 Do bOOW NIW'vfN39 ££ L -JO R O -s q£ [-DO si 0 3 Q Q_ O 3 H? 5£ I -DO 19-11 A_ 0 Q 9£L-JO F-_ I sL C) fU (D N Q £Slz ®Maouwad HOIO a 01 -G7 L Z sz n O 09-C9lZ sl • O_ (D N Q 09-£S l Z s l n S oz-cg L z a i Z O c N 1? 11'11" i 512" BUILDING TOWER TOP SIGN 61.6 sF x 2 = 123.2 sF 1J • BUILDING ENTRY SIGN = a 40 T 14 i In I+' LONG RANGE PIANNING DEVF,I.OPMENT REVIEW December 19, 2006 Mr. James Bond 319 S. Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLF•ARWA•rER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICIiS BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUr, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 Ti?miONF (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-04019 (210 S. Osceola Avenue) Development Order Dear Mr. Bond: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 19, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office (place of worship)/overnight accommodations use (Phase I) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006- 11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court Street under the provisions of Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 1.79 acre subject property is located on the west side of Osceola Avenue between Pierce and Court Streets; 2. That the subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as the subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; FRANK I111MMM, MAYOR .1Om ncllzAl;, C(mixcii.mrmisrR 110)-l I I:?uu:r<I?, Ccx;u:n.?ut?lisrR BILL JONSON, C0I;N(:11.Nn:>useR ® Cmn.it,? A. Prn:RSh?, Czx xz:u.>nausi:r. „IicwAI. I:?IPl.ovntic? r nNn AI'I'IR,\IA'Hvi? Ac HON F.MITM I;R" IY0 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-903.C, 2-903.J and 2-903.K of the Community Development Code; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Transfer of Development Rights criteria as per Sections 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the wire fencing is replaced with fencing permissible within the downtown and complementary to the principle structure with regard to material, texture, size, shape and color (i.e. masonry wall, vinyl fence, etc.); 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, all outdoor lighting shall comply with the requirements of Section 3-1302 of the Community Development Code; 3. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule; 4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, shall be placed underground; 5. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 6. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 7. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 8. That the shuttle service being operated by the Church of Scientology as mitigation to the parking deviation continue to be operated in conjunction with this use; 9. That the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be interim and shall not become the ultimate use of the property; 10. That the first building permit for the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be applied for within one year from the date of the Community Development Board approval (by December 19, 2007); 11. That all required Certificates of Occupancy for the interim office/overnight accommodation use must be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit; 12. That the first building permit for the ultimate overnight accommodation use must be applied for within 18 months of the date of the Community Development Board approved (by June 19, 2008); and 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy for the ultimate overnight accommodation use must be obtained within two years from the date of issuance of the initial building permit. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. L - Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at 7-obert.tefft@nivclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications I Osceola S210 -Oak Cove (D) - Approve&Osceola Ave S210 - Development Order 12-19-06.doc add6 _~~c~ i~ ~ l DEVELOPER ~~G~ND , ~ ~ Z ~ 15 ~ ~ o o EXIST. ELEVATION ~ } p Iv EXIST. CONTOUR ....L n~l,l,n~~l~,~t~~l~~l~:~l~~~... ~ ~~~L~I~,I~I„~~I~~,~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~U Q Q ~o~oNU FROM AN "X" IN THE CONCRETE WALK AT THE S.W. NEW ELEVATION +10.00 •U ~ ~ ~'0 ~ ~ CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF PIIIZCE STREET AND 1 T HIP 295. RANGE ~ PROJECT BOUNDARY o ¦ ¦ - ¦ ¦ - ¦ ¦ - yam-- ~ o a~ ~ ~ OSCEOLA AVENUE IN SECTION 6, OWNS , 15E. , CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA; RUN 1 1 I 0 ( I i U pNN m Qli~vT t` ~.N SOUTH,148.20 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGLNNING; .THENCE _ 4U W EXIST. STORM SEWER ~ U ~i ~ ~ CONTINUE SOUTH ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT. OF WAY ~ ~ o. m~a~ LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE (SEE DEED BOOK 1344,~PAG 9, ' NEW STORM SEWER ~ w U 'p PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA),135.56 FEET, RUN THENCE 5.89°34"00" W., 572.20 FEET; RUN THENCE NWLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF 980 NEW UNDERDRAIN ~ ~ E ~ ~ 9. f R$~ FEET RADIUS (ALSO BEING THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY , ; , " t ~ -I-I-I I-i-1-I-1~ -I-I-I- ~ OF PIERCE BLVD., ESTABLISHED BY COURT ORDER 5-12-75), ~ , !I~ ~ , ' ~ t ~ • I r ~ fit. E ~I " I;1 n p t a . , r ~ , , EXIST. SAN. SEWER w , .,i s t (CHORD BEARING N.10 11 37'W, CHORD DISTANCE 134.29 ~I ,I!o , I~~ i , ° i r f1 n'1 tu7 t''1t ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ -II , tn,t t1fl~~ ~a~ ~ , , , I E, S~ ~ ~ ~ NEW SAN. SEWER ¦LL~.L~.Ll.L~.l.I¦Ll.~.~. FEET),134.40 FEET; RUN THENCE 5.8915 30 E., 596.00 FEET C 5 d 3 I ~ In ' a TO THE P.O.B. q~~{ ~ ~g~g ~pp ' ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ gyp' 1„ ~ n' i~u 1 ~ 1t iIII I ,I t aP~ ~ ~ •p~ ~ 1 ~pll , t ~e~r u7i~ ~i '1°L y; ,,1 Ilt,l tl~ ~y~~> L CB`f rS.Pi,'~I ~ a a a. a. I I. ~ ;"'li iil^ . E,I~ ~ m;~l s, ap tb€ K1,~ E . ~ ~I` 11. 3 ~ , EXIST. WATER SERVICE ENGINEER OF RECORD 11 ~ i I €~j •~i' f n ,3 F' kt2 1 t CON 8 3~ : ~~dp~l,: ,f;;. yy ,I . TAINING 78 050 S.F. OR 1.792 ACRES M.O.L. d Ir n J H~~„H~~ X13 ~ ~ ppp 1 1 ~u ~ ~ t a ~r , f t~ ~n a; ~I E I t I ~ I ~9 I I (<!,1 -I 11 161 f .au. W '{.`,p i ~~i 4T ~u. iIL'lll :•::^tl. '1555 tqo it II ttn ~ _ n ~ : ; 11Iti~~ NEW WATER SERVICE o 1 0 t 1 u h aq t _ ~ .~t'Yn~1N~H~j~ J ~ .k~^ ~I~' n a'. 6~ R ~Q t71 I'SpiJ fYp u IjIJ I ~u! i ~t Ott ~ t ~ p i r ~"~r ~ ~ O t ) b~ G~ Q 1 .n / M. i I ilyit'linµn nll~ ng~{u~u anon bi ~ ' y 1 1 .p, 1 ~ ~ ~ k'pYp ~ a. NEW INLET ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~, pll hun ~I. jl{~'iy a I, ~ u k ~ 2' ~M] O 'r~`^~' , t 7[ u nku u n u n y ~ I I ~ ~ 11~ {~?~h^ ~ Ili uijp~p~p1)Gp ~i _ 1' 8:~ ~ I G u h I ~~~I ~Rn n u ~ : ~ e J rt I ` , rna^ ~ r 411 I ~ F n I'. Ij31.....:' a 1 fal ~ J~ 1 ~ ~.pi ~ f~~ ~.X p tl~.tu ia1 u a a£~ ~ n. ~h ~N W ~~(I~~~ ~ U "t J~FI~ ~ ~ 11 n ~ - t~,~~nry~ ~ d p p ~ NEW SAN. MANHOLE • V ~ w ~ ? ' ~~~J z 'z' pt n 3'n aa1 1 t W W + 17 I~ ~ a P . , ~ 'K >i ~y'gryl 11~11311'1'al'E Ilyspµl~,{p~ ~ J i7 , V ~XISIISI15118~~IIEn3~,11131. l ' '.~µy~ I ~ IEI ~ uenz I^n3 lauau3; { #A E I gK t~ J, ~ I t 1 u n ui: §iS31~^ , p ~ f0 Z W?? M EI~Fl6nal I 1 F 1 ~ p 'ahr ; ~ q ~ ~1r I. 1~ 0 ~ --N , lauau ; ~ #A#{. 1 I ~ i i ~ ~ ,e ap;u ,.n~a ual 1't; ~ C.O. j 2 IL ~ , q i oi.; ,~"tl 11: :i IC{.3.111'11 I t.' ~ i;l> ~ la IF ~ + .r4 E . ;4~ t~~ ~ ~ ~ I1 ~ ~ ~F' ~ NEW CLEAN-OUT(C.O.) ..I¦.¦I.I.~.!¦IBI¦I.I.l.I¦I.I. ~ z a $ m ` I J 147 N lyll I ~i 1~1(i € ' fPE„ft'i.,~ , •j. I~ I~yAt '~u i ~ RIERCE ~ ST~E~T ~ ~ ~~~y,~ ~ t ~~.t~ ~ n,< ~ y ; 3 ..t ~ ~ ~'"a` ~ EX. BUILDING AREA LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL I- W ~ ~~4~ u s , u ~ ~ . LLLLLLLLLLLLLL LL L LLL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {n ~ .o . 'n ~ , ,y. ~ ~ n. p nM'ii liti~ p ~ ~ 7~~ ~~~~~g ~I~Z~~ ~ ~~1iV~f ~ ' i ? i i ,t ~Ib 7 A ~ ~yp~u r ` I y~l' ~ ' q q ~ ~ t ~ `Q ~ , ~ O ~ tom, n 1 ~ i S4 ~rt s & ~ ~ I r y ~~f1 I t~~ , . n I €r EXIST. CONCRETE ~ .Q ' q ~ ~ a . W ~ i, r ~i ~ a, ~F ~ 'r'bt. ;r„"3~ ` ~~y `m..,z' h ky ~,/~1 t ~ t80'-~~rr y.> , J ' E~ 1.13t'~~ . ~ . ~I py4; . . G it ~ 61~ t. - Fa ~I ~ , ~Iy,'I ~ N p~,~~~~"` ~t~A4 ~Wri ~ N~. .1 :E . . ~ t, ~s6' _ W ~ ~ 1 4FJ 5 ~ 3 ~ W x;11 ~ ~ ~ NEW CONCRETE ~F ~ , x~;~z ~ ~ L J -~~I~. ~ : u . r . I ' <a I t i . I s;~ { ;f ~I I a u d.'.' 'JII II II"i ` ~ TEMP. SILT BARRIER. JU=a N Y lil I It = 1 :I i 1, II 't ~4~ I1y~,~,~} tz , II 1p;l, Ii, II !i ~ ~~p ~ IS KF`~i~tA ti r ! s N; ~ y~, Inl ti ,~,p ~u iluia a~l~ ~"'11~Iu~d I~~lp; ~ ~ U rb h~ ~ a I t I .I ~ , ~ POINT OF CONNECTION ~ W ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ty ~ E , ~ ~ `I €I OF NEW UTILITY TO EXIST. a ~ ~ . ~It"! ,~,~,,,JI nn uy u l pu ua~IpI,pp t C~~ r ~~r~ri 6 ~ EG , .I; t~ i 1 1 III. ;ill 11 " ~1 ff li'AYS!'i ftrp?;lnil'p~~~~~EL~~~~pptl~l 91 ~ ryo ~ Ik, t~. II jll Py .y ,III{I. ' i L ` ~d~a~r1 7 ii yiir 'a ° ai ~I litl f,k , . ,I ,.-111;; I I v ~ Date issued: > „ t I ~ , ~ ~Y..~ ~ M METER 04120106 ~ r ! V I ~ ~ ~ # ~ I ~;Fep ~ ; III, ~ I I f-' a ~ cn ~ ~ ~ I P gat {I ~ t a ~ ~ ~ r ~ I ~ ~~~h , . q e, q. , 1 I"' ' ~lB~' 1 I ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' ~ ~ B.F.P.D. BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE Pro ect Number: A 3 I ,.~lEt 1 't I t' I ; I - I It , ~r v i.t ~ y~1 (c ~ 06-09 c S° i 1 -II't' ~ 4 tt a' '~,f~ _ F.H.A. FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY ~ rt ~ ~ ~ Designed by: KR E 1 t f~1S~.. +i I'~1 . M ~ F.D.C. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION i ~ . ~ 'P"~ ~a r~~.. ~ Drawn bY~ ~ 5~n+ ~iti~~ 4~~~ ' ~ ~ Ii~l''t~l;ia,ll; ,"ir,`r`~~ ~ T.B.O.- TEMPORARY BLOW-OFF , ~ p ~ E. ,~,F= ~ ~ h ;,II ; rat ;,~~~4,i~; T.&V. TAP AND -VALVE Revisions: C L7~'~fQ 3~e ~ - 5~ n ~ . 1 y ~y'a ~ F 1 I t I I up lti u o _ III I I1p I 1 p II p~'pk 1p p i~ lat ~n ~ ~ ' ~ g it r ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ `~E a a I ~ I I l-tja u ~ k~54i' II p a ~ ~ ~ I F f r X15 pit; ~ , No. Date Description 5 ~'OUNTY ~~[.tigTH0U5E ~5~7 ~ ~ I~.: i'., ,frn , ~J ~ ~ q 4 3 4 A.~ gi p, I~ 1 n k , ~ ~ 1 08/30/06 DRC SUBMITTAL ItGGG k' i ~ ~ t" ~ i 1 ':III'. ~ 9- I . ~ t it t i , ~r ~ y 11 ~g I as it I , ~ t ~ , s~ ~ 2 10/17/06 ISSUE 3 .fi, , D 3 . ~ r '~r , ~ ~ ' PI ItI- t N ;,II ICI IJ1~' I It I I11„I ~ ~ , .I P, ~ b ' 1 , .I ,I ~ , ~ 1 l I I I,H ~ 3 11 /02/Ob DRC COMMENTS ~ ; ''7 ~ td r 1 ~J , k~~ ~4~. IF f ~ _ ! ~ I t p 5 ~I~~1 I' i I'16S{_ 1 1 ~ a I i ' 6 Yti kt ~ 4 ~ I' ~ I III I t~ p y- I~t fyt yl t ~ rII 12 ~ 'p ~4~;; . _ ~ ICI q ~ ~ V .6 ~ e d; ~ ~ 1 a b ~ t ~ I I .1y1 ~ i l t! ,t.l i-1.7 li~~;11t i' & ~ I uaha„~~,~, 5 a ~ ~ ,I I 4 "F ~ a t ~ ~ rd ~ ~ ~ ,y'.. , I ;11~~1 ~,{~tt~I'~~ JI I I~ ~'1- I a, ~ ~ nyt( t~~" 1~ ~i 1 I. 5t pr{~~,= i• ~ ry ~ ~5 1 i. . _ 6 f 1' F I t~ I Isif, lp ,..It i~V 7 NORTH 8 PRELIMINARY SET PERMITTING SET CONSTRUCTION SET PROPOSED P PR PROPOSED (P) EXISTIiVG E PHASE I -INTERIM CHURCH OFFICES + HOTEL RCH PHASE II REQUIRED SEC/TWP/RGE HOTEL 16-29S-15E ZONING: p D D PINELLAS COUNTY LAND USE: cap cap Permit No. Exp, Date CBD PER SECTION 2-902 P~~ A~P~®~~® FLD 200b-04019 A INTERIM CHURCH OFFICES V CA~lT CES HOTEL N/p CASE # 1~71r~a'o-oyo?q FLD 2002-07019 USAGE: + HOTEL 252 .ROOMS CA$ETYFE,,oµ~, SWFWMD 46024044.000 Sept 17,2007 78,05q S.F. 78,050 S,F, 78,050 s.F. N/A DRC DATE o o~ o~ LOT AREA: 1.792 ACRES 1.792 ACRES 1.792 ACRES CDB DATE ~2 14 OG 1458 S,F. BUILDING COVERAGE: ~ C ____14,788_ S.F 15,494 S.F, S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE 18. % 18,9% ( ) N/A DATEATURE 19.9% Project Name I GROSS FLOOR AREA (S.F.): 173,23 S.F. 113,712 S.F. (Floors 1-8) 184,: _8) 312,200 S.F MAX OAK COVE 184,372 s.F. (all floors) 4.a REDEVELOPMENT THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY APPEARS TO HOTEL (2,36) „ » F.A.R.: 2.~2 36) LIE WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X ACCORDING TO THE 70,660 S.F. (Floors 9-13) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL -13) 2.36 NUMBERS 125096 0015 H. MAP REVISED DATE N;A N/a N/A N/A ° c~i'~ & INTERIM FRONT: 08/19/2005, PROVIDED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. SETBACKS: SIDE: 4' 3' N ~o~~ 09 2006 OFFICE USE 3' /A REAR: 1 I 14 114 114' N/A PLANNING DEPARTMENT Project Address CITY OF CLEARWATER 210 SOUTH HEIGHT: 115' 115' 115' N/A OSCEOLAAV. PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA: i (V.U.A.) 27,932 S,F, 26,949 S.F. N/A CLEARWATER 26,949 S,F. IND~~ 0~ FLORIDA 33755 I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE RATIO: N/A (I.S.R.) 0, 4 0,53 a53 C1.1 CIVIL SITE DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED FROM SIGNED & SEALED SURVEY BY: OPEN SPACE: 36,07 S.F. 36,638 S.F. EDWARD C. ELLIOT, P.S.M. FLA. REG. No. 3983 S.F. & % OF GROSS SITE 36,63a s.F. N/A C2.1 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN Drawing Title ( ) 46 2/ 47.0/ DATE OF SURVEY: JULY 09, 2002 47'0% C3.1 GRADING, STAKING ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN IN NGVD 1929 DATUM. PARKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING: 2,84 S.F. 5,539 S.F. 5,539 S.F. 2,748 S.F. AND UTILITIES SITE PLAN CIVIL (S.F. & % OF V.U.A.) 10.x% 20.6% zo.6% 10.0% .MIN SITE DATA L1.1 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN 68 52~ PARKING: 52* N/A PARKING CALCULATIONS: Drawing Number * INCLUDES 3 HCAP SPACES. c 1 B =~~~1 ~i~~,I~vAR~~ ~AFTIST ~,HU~C,H j - I~ DEVELOPER TFALL PIPE CAPACITY ~ , OU x 66LF-15" RCP ®0.5% SLOPE TO MEW MH. ~ x x CAPACITY 5CFS FLOWING FULL. x ~ I ..a~0' roh\ i i 5 YEAR 1 HOUR POST DEVELOPED STORM n- EX. Ir•IL Er To REI~AUV U, r, 2 C~' ICP ELEV.=30.8i •~0~ C=0.64 i=3.7in/hr. A=1.79 Acres _ ` INb'. ELEV.=?q.o2 vtif. X' VJ _O Q=4^2cfs<5cfs OK. ~I, n,- ` IPJ`+/, ELEV.=24.17 E. ~ Q ~ x II .00' P ~ 5~ SEC. O IV C: PROVIDE UTILITY _ ~ E~2 DETAIL ail I -F- Z ~ _ I r ° 596 EX.INLET J' _ S 8915 30 E I (P f NEW EASEMENT OVER EX. NEw ~ i ~ ~ h M ~ ~ J EX. INLET TG BE RECONSTRUCTED ,~"•.T TOP ELEV.=2%.D% ti`?` ~ .~I t ,5 PER DETAIL ON C6.1 IIPJV. ELEV.=21.%2 It1 NEW 6 BLACK I o „ ' - 595.93 IVI t TOP 9.0 I IIJV. ELEV.-?2.82 E. I X METAL FENCE S 89°14 58 W' M , LANDSCAPED FlRE HYDRANT LINE STRAIGHT I I W ~ ~ N ~ O NEW LIGHT AREA PRIOR TO C.O. END \ CURS ( I ~ w U `0 EX. INV 3,24 I •w 0 15" 3 POLE CURB 1 ~ 3~' t'r.~r~ I , ~ SILT BARRIER (SEE DETAIL) I - ~1ALL-_.-._ _ Cl U 1 `J" "•'r u. l:i" 1' l:i" jr~ ~~15" P 10tr,-. LP ~4rt' tig II ~"~O~C: R-~o----- ---,-~~j, i. I 2O~ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ _ •iS. - - -^--0--°-- ~'--'t'"6- ID~i' ')q% , , 'r g'v-" i 1 i L. P •t'Y ~i,~ -!1 I 1.) ' _ + _ 15 J ~ o ¦ ¦ , ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦.~f;~ ¦ ¦ 2¦O~ ¦ ¦ 2~ ¦ ¦ 222. w--a--4-~~- ~t~' jNSTALL :~jt' tiJ ~1= 1 17 _ I _ _ ~ 5" NEW Ir o, o 0 31. ~ o o WRB : 29.14G `l'g II I O / 1 v ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 o a -yam ' ~f ° I~ 0 - ~ / NEW LP I ;C REMAIN L rde+'r EX. 6" ~3~ NEW q^ . ! nnnw Hann unnm nnnn .e um.~l nm n n noun Hannon mnnn,n W n,,, e- I ~ I - 1 ~ . a ~ 1!}" I cX• ?~4'~ F.C.F. -pA~we. ,,.ia'tr+a EX. ~ •'3~ W JL.Z • , ,J; r.r°°®w. aet~,aa 4" R , sECUlanv CONC. CURB ~ LANDSCAPED , ° .7. 1! l . ea airs „a r,.~. ~ GATC ~l -f n .2 ..n..,... .non. .nf e ~ ~ . ~ - I~°~~--' _ i - ' ~ , 0. ~ ~ D ~ 6 ~~EX.~~8~Fi~~4+;ATER ~LIiJE TO ~PEMAIPI~ ~ ~ ' X •t ' 7 ~ ~0„pw®r•°Pa•e' \ ~ °aam~h~TC RE1dlfl TO REIvIAIN ~QJ AREA • ~ r _ aea. *~+e ~J EX. INLET TC EEMAIN 9 9X18 _rl 4' CURB ~f0 uErm ' i ~ 9 ~ _ 29.25G TAPER ~`~'0 ' j - U W ~ U ~a ~5''- EX. INLEr --~„r - sl h~ aaaaaaa =='-I `'J' i+J TCP ELEV.=,30.62 NEW O s r ,'ri v C,- _ _ -°Y - _ n r ,.°a 1 ! _ '.~=9 TRAIGHT • ~ ~3 TOP ELEV. 6.65 , s___.__ ti ''JEW G'H^ \ NEW CONC, aay,aa ~ N INI. L.L.L. ^4.9' JJ CURB ~.f MODIFY PER ~o• - E -a-, W000 FE"J,.E 1 NEW SAN M, a ; ~ DETAIL ON C6.1 ~~•101~~~ ~J J ~ NEW SAN M. 6" CURB ,t~~. am,a a ~ RELGCATED ° ` ~ ~ ~ --z_. o~ FHA AND ELOCATED HA AND NEW STRAIGHT ~_I -i 9.36G Rc~'dy~S~JEW 8' CRp55 ' t I ' ` ~~r _--CL~LSVA - _ - TOP.32. ~ ~ "~~J~° „ a~~ N r EW 10 P.V.C. ®a,,.ai„n®bg BOLLARDS ° 6.0 m _ NEW 72,6LF 8 ~ DIP SAN.®0.5% ~ -®mr OLLARDS Ex. HEFT TO REMP.!N CURB aam do 1~.J.+7 ~,~~J. pt WAUC WITH', I I i V J ro TOP ELE'J.=3C.~D EX, ASPHALT TO BE MILLED ,t, g i_.~. ~a ~e I * W11 ~~~11 11' ~ ~ i ROOF DRAIN WEw a.2. ¦ ~ = r----- j EX. ASPHALT TO BE PORTS EX. 24" q`~°<' r CLEARWATER i .r-.mww.ar ~ ~ INV, ELEV.=25.70 W. AND RESURFACED ~ NEW WHEEL '30~~ ~ y_~_' ~~ddQJJ' g~~~PAOER FlE4D AND I I .a is o-,y-,~ Ih~l1/. ELEV.=2,..80 S. Ly ~ ~ l~ COLOR WI ° , 1O, - _ EX. GREASt I ' MILLED AND F~~ COCHERE \ , 1 ,5 - ~ / MATCH EX. 4'. M; l~¦ b' '7, I~, -5 TF<AP TO I RESURFACED :r., J o..a,ov STOP TYP _ { } _ 8.470 .CONC. CURB ! I.r~ NEW _ HEADER BAND b i !''1 Z" , f?,_L/AIN~ ~XI~I~~47 ".'tS;:•t..s: ..,!v.`.:z Y ~7+1.7M~ 4~ NEW ~•V. NEW [~,c ' NEW WHEEL '~O11y NEW LIGHT slcri ,1 : ~ { SEE DETAIL I~, x ° ¦ - r .a• 1 LANDSCAPE ~ • 1E"„ t~--,~~-.~ I"11 ~.U i ~V~¦IP~71E '.,t+,, .,~`•J'..~~••. .:.{x,'' ,,~NEV')' ~`r• ~ FLAG i I J ' ~ ° ~ 'xe OA 4" to AREA L~ PO! F- r I ~r; , ~-`fir,;-,,, ~ ,XO REMAI (~J ~ ~p FLAG CURBIG~~o;X .STOP (TIP) X POLE (TYP} _ 2s G } H ENGINEER OF RECORD roLE--_ "7 ¦ j!,u ~I~ ,r~`~17_" % 10" I~ - 125. rj .~i...~ 't' i RENAInI NEW NEW REticAI~, ~5 Rs• ~j~'j ~ ~ x ~ ; ~ ( ~ ' ~.0 ~ 1~1 / _ _ 9.5" J t,J '~I•' i" N w, ! +,;,NN~ 1 ¦ ~ u" - • PA (i ~ x'.13 J _ 1 , - $ ~ S ~J Y~ ~{•f,. s„ SAN M.H. SAN M.H. l6~ I ~ ~ ~ p s c~. . ;`\~r~~~>~:, (j co I L'J - _ ~_i O~'D We -EX. CONCRETE L L ~ Orp e~ ~d~ U ~ + - . 1 7" ~ • •AS TO REMAiJ L-I- I S EEN I i." ~ 1,_ - --i F-,~' C, DU 1'E H 1 L LL L-L- NEW STOP SIG •'.qN. 12• 12' 12 9 Ew s>Rpl T ; ~ ~;;~';5;; n` N 0 ~ Z ~ a L>. ~ 1 - - ~i MPSTER 5 AND .6 ; N ° C.O. IN C LING L LL.~LLL 1 1 1 1 1 1 LLLLL 1 -J•'. o / N, F~ L7, ROLLED HUTS ROOM ~~LLLLNEwLOesY_LLLLLLLL 3 cE ` ~ ~ 1? LP.r., lq'==-+~-_ °,4~ m OR AT OUT TO STAGING A SHALL BE 0 ~LLL~ ADGrrION _LLLLLLLL :~~p b Hp (TYP.) cuRe , N W N wl~,.. ~ - ~ ~ N 3 1 D' 30.75 ' o o •o ~y ~ - g u ~ TAMPED ; - ro ~ N G~ I ° I N w PJE~N - ~ Ft,, OSCEOLA AS REA BY BUILDI NEWELEVAT R tiLLU ! . x ° o ~ REQUIR NG sWAPTADDmON BSBS.F,1sr _LLLLLLL :~iJ"' `§o'gEO ~ STOP ~ U T ~ ~ ~ ~ 4Y 3~~1 p REMWr - A CONC. ,I ~ - _ ~ ~ m C',~ 1 SI .ENO ~ 4 LP 'v" ~ ~y%~ ~ 9.BG S~V F, 'W1nvN 41'~ i1~11 U • .r ri >v , +t~7, , / ~ ~ _ --J- ED FOR PICK UP r y 1T013FLOOR ~ 'LLLL~FLOORONLV}_LLLLLLLI ° - y~ w s1 -4~i,"' ' 66'~,^~.` - ~ I 'r (83sF.1 rv LLLLLLLLLI ~ ;r}': .°,I ,F7 M7 SKI y"~ ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ / J ,yl •a ~ y; . !4~ NEB'`; R hp's ~ •;;f ~ ~ n..n~n.~ .C ,~~nn~. ~ n l V w W ~ uNi' I i ~ Z EW `/`l_F SIGN ' ExFDC~. I ~ - `~'0 ~ .~~~Q ` ~ ~ sr M . J ~L. ~C _~-.1 •D - r . ND ~ n 'non m ~ TO REMAI S i ~ x i ' ~ d le ~ W ~ • `'j; 24 cuRQ.., o .n.~rn• .,.,~I .~~"...lm~„ T0''~~_}. : I 9.91G eI l~ _ $ 0 N; 1 e t r^ „ ~ ~ _ , U _k~ I aD~ f j EW 6"XB" :1 A,,.,,, • 1 . 195.7 X -yc,' ~~E~~ ~ . o ; ~ ~ ~ ' w W , EW a"XB" '1 ~ ; R•rO.P+~' 'Il'IE TO RE?r~IAINm ..n ..,'9X18' ,n.,,,,,,,,,, ,mnn„, ~~'1 U1 lil 1 W£z > 0_' ' i {~J i ° ~i11 1~' ~ - i 1 I '0. WYE -1 9~ EX. f ENCE-- ~.r 1,,' I - I EX.13 STO ~ ' ~ ~nrJC E~, .P:~, ~ _ RY CONp .,r~ - r. ~ sty„ _ - w s:',_~! . 6d~ EN PMHI _ D _ 6) , p~~ ~ ~ y~ ~ , fy,.,. - 1z.o' I F OMINIlIM B ~ 1 i r-, : ,~1~,,~. ' y~y / LOOK ELE - qC UILDING - ~ - 3' - EE ~ 9' .annnnq,in,,,,,m.n,ny~,y~A17Ar~~"~° .nc.X•~p'J",'~y",.n~. 4~ 14..n •SNE { ,~30'02G i li W{~~~1'iwa ~ I~W:' SA~.~ ~ ~ nnnn. ~ ~ • FINE L ~ ~ ,•,G }~0,: N~ ~r~ J. I no I ~.-33.25 1 °_~.,_i I 1, FQI 13" FO 'mf~l ~f ~ 077 G : 1 I I~12 `~5.,, „ - _ I II ~ Z - NEW x A~~A + 5 1 i i p t~'',rd''` q? ql X `b I; ~ S 1 CURB i Q W r«~.~j.. I :cr,:i;,,,:;; r,. t ~~t7 rn r `I ' I ~ LANDSCAPED 'Y tilt;;; 1 S.F. i 6' Za" ` ~ p W1 r I ENV AREA "S Y,"Ii .tii' - i FC01 p, tj\~ I''~, X O~O L TRANSITION i~ O~ J'f ..~.y.y_ • ®1 ~w ~ ~ ~ '0.13G 4' TAPER a i I ~ ~~r , ~ [~~qb J ' O- ~ ~ ~ 6.' i W t 1F.. J ~ ~ rn11 jaw 1 9L ~3.7 T~'D v NEW 1 i it w.~w ,n ' ~ : ro 13" ~ - DE ti ~ 33,9' i ' - ~ I 6.8' ~EX. INLET TO REMAiPJ ~ ~.G ~ ~ ~ NT v Q ir. , , EX. ASPHALT TO BE MILLED p 30A8 ~ ~ ¢ N M` ~ ~ :11J: TOP ELEV.- 3L'.84 31.8 w 0.18G X dae ~U I-. J°~ ~ ; d I, x ~ op t I a ~ - ~ : < ~ ' rS S ~ , O LANDSCAPED _ i L,_„ I I NEW ~ _ ~z - i AREA N f:~. + ~ i'~-+FD j o - _ 1N - - 0 I , 7 J 4°CONC,S W NEw IRV. ELEV.-L6,:i4 AND RESURFACED + ~ r ~ W = '4°CONC,S/W ~ N ~91dt'~', I ,1~'Q~ • ~ cV ~ r ~~']_._._i I ' ~ Z ~ W Z ~pcD o, a, & VALVE '1,; REC. WAT. 1•ti''; IIJ LRY ~ ~ FCO CO ~ I ¦ , ~ NEW 16"X2"7A `l, 1 NEW 2" P • - - y?• ~ +ri d o; T 1 o r CIT s l ` _ ~ _ I ~~w o ° i I (BY G.C_ OR_ ~ „ . EX. AZEBO 3 r ~ ' NEW - ' ~ NEW NEWS NEw NEW e' ~ 024G N ~ . ; I N~ W FW- N W ;.0 tiEw-~ ~ ~ ENaasuRE STRAIGHT NEW LANDSCAPED DECaRAn~E F: ~ J = Q w Y v STRAIGHT wAU.(Tm) o - . t}' - ~ 1 ~ U ~ a sL~ioEJCI 1 CURB CURB AREA ~ BY OTHERS ~ - : --1.. (TYP.) CURB ~ I ~ N U N % fir- r'~11 ' 2 (11 . ,ti ',~2 , y. t var,c c PnrJGE ta.1, ~ ~ 1 ~ , l I `r 1 r 3 ~4rV 1 ~H. I' EY..CDNf6`%W ~I kPJG C FaAP.ANCE LINE 1 - ~ "I _ 9~X18~ ~ S O OP - 0,38G TRANSITON I l EX 2° GFlS ID REMA;lJ 4 "`.••111 4 sl 4' TAPER ~ , '--'r W ~ U NEl4 COOLIAlG TOWERS . I ~ M e I ' 1 ~ 4 Ur ! y~ N % TO P.EMAiN r s I' asm•,asy~cnsm t, ~ ~i ~ , ~ X112 ~ „I EW ti~; y ^ NEW BRICK ~ ,,y I 1 I I ' . ASn~GAS GAio GAS fiASns?,~Fnn~-bP none 6pS~6AS ®1G4:®GRS GFS A"®;,A„ T: °AS ~~~rns rns 1 CX SIGN ~.C~ ~ I i Gas'... n. i Jr" 12 I N y,, y' r'; , y., ~ > PAVER ~N'V ,I, I ~ ~ ,XJ ~:1 ~ t.~ 11 ~ ~ BRICK ,,~~'y CORRIDOR NEW ~ ,3,1~~„~I ~'7~ - I non, uTam nonlaun~l' ~ ulaltr ~ ~ ~ i r ~ _J ~ 199 • ~ G~s>~ ~ , 0.466 ~ Date 155Ued; 04~LO~OV iri4 - I ~ m 1 ,--~-AFPOX. LUCATIDIJ • 1 ~ 14° ~ ° % -.LANDSCAPED > t-~ _ ~ ~ r PAVER ti~;F r 5„ '15" NEW GAS METER I 'I XFer~ia III ~zaMA o ~ ~ 16 RF'.,L,41v~ED W,~fCR ~ ~I. ;y AREA ,N;• ~"rte BY OTHERS '`;~~~a'' I I / TILITY ~ i XFRMR I- ~ GIavERATOR ON BASE 1 I o ~ ~ EACH 72° SQUARE GRATA, . w~ ~ERNR ~zc pug ~ TmE FUEL rArJK ~ o ~ ° WITH 16" OPENING ~ c~ 1 32.0 tNdumber• - I / 2 7 ..w?Z~6H(L,~.~i _,~..t}. y- ~ (R-8738-1) ~ a ~ ~ I 3 NEW LAND~_~.AP~ ~ ~ : PrOjeC OU'O9 SEX, VERILCN TO REMAIN- SC ED AREA`? LP' PARKWAY C 1 ECTION ' n~4 ~ ~ Iv'i 0 ® ~ ~ZD -("i ~1 1 ~ ®..r_~I_¦_s-®.a. sa ,L f> _ e~gN¦ny*m._°,a ¦ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ~ ~ ¦ A ~_~1•.~ ~7, ~-k,®- a~~- a-®-¦ .'F<. :4 . J i ¦ ~ ¦ ¦ ~ ¦ --)ice'- X. _ ~ n '6 ~----~f-'- -h-' ~--k'--- 3 ~ - -t...- -1-._-_•_• - • • ..;~.-t-._ ~ .,,O.ry-~ - ~ O.57G Q,~~ ; ° Designe by KR • / w !1L ` ~iF--rte ~ _ ~ .r . " A] 1.0' ti ' " EX. ti/ J U, 'SEX. 1' ~„ASJIJf~ ( U'IALL. -~ti , N W UTILITY EEEEEESSSSSS ~ 1 A ' W UTILITY 8 . Ar~.n~.~. ,n~.~.:..,.:.~.:.~.~.:n . :.~~..~.:.~.n.~.n~.~..~ . ~.1a~.~.~.,~ 10..5~n..~n ~ n.n: ~.~...~n.~...g:AD. ~.:n.:.~....~...nn.n~..~.~..•,! I Drawn b nq'r t .~.1 .I ~ 1. f ~ i;. ~ n ,fib. IiD ? c I M,,, ~'cP ' , - - ~ _I T ANSFORMER I , _ .I j ~ ~ , „ 6 +ilrJt`L ~ ~L F NI,E TO -R~P.9AI ~ ANSFORMER ~ 10' ~ ~~n~.~. ~~~~.I.~n. ~.~~el0.:n. '-~r;~10" 10 IZ~~-','. .:n~ . ~ ~ . ,:1~. EX. .SAN: I 4 ~ ~ ~ A•A FENCE FROM EX. Y1NYlJ«. "I2 EJ 11~ ~ ~ ~ RBVISIOnSi 10 f,1. 8" 4 SMdlTA?T SEbVEn J ~ ~ l., C/L FENCE TO BACK OF I~ ~ ~ ~ I I , EX. UlILIIY E;ISLMENT 1 7' r'J i ~ - r- INK FENCE 1U REMAILI--I M ' , c ~ r, _ ~ tX• e -.IIAIrJ L S 89 34 00 W P 8c .572.20 P 57~2:~~5~ ~ t 1 ~ E,~(, ../~.iJ M ' 1100 1,17 r~ - _E,~, SAPJ ~7 ? COL. ?COL. _ ----?COL. C01~,-'TO RtiY!AIN'---?COL NEW WALL (SEE DETAIL A) I~ 'S~'' ~ in I ~ 1 _ NEW 91W PATTERN ANO ~ ~ X ' 1 1 S1LT RRlER SEE DETAIL 15" x' ~ `L d ' I I - - - -T----- i ~ coLORSTOn+ATCxEx ~ E ? No: Date Descri Lion n'!M .5.80-" ~ p ~ PATTERN MJACENTTO SIIE~IN ~ ~ 1 ~ I~ P I I tl E r , J C ~J P~ T Y 1,~L.. , ~.n.4 I ~ I ~ _ _ !y ~ , , I I~ 'I I - , . ; , I ,Nl/. 28.19 IPdI': ?8.04 r ~ I I ~oNTOFCOUxTYP,wwxc.,~J! E s' ~ ~ ~ / I THE SOUTH. 8EE DETAIL GHEE! N e , `L5 E 1 a4/2$! Q6 CITY COMMENT$ i ,r~1. _8. ~ ~ w ~ : ~0 ,,'t I 1 nP 6" D1 I C~ rl,, C~ ~ I 1-OP 6" Dl = 29.6% ~e ~ I~ 1 2 LE V E~, paQi~il~IY~7' ~ a ~l C~ I 2 06/21/06 SCHEMATIC DESIGN L r°~'~ D• 0' ~ CORE NEW II' ~ r- ~~U' x 4 LE1~EL PARKfNG I CORE NEW INV.28.11 NW RECORDED EASEMENT qq ~ ~ ~ ~ I° E ~ I II 3 08/08/06 PIREACCess COMMENTS ~ REQUIRED BEFORE CORING ~ ~ ~ ~ E I1 ~ L Ll T Y IS ~ I X~ EX. MH PER CITY OF ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ 4 OS/30/Ob oRC sueMITTAL i ~~PRPKIP~C ~T,A:;AGE Y ~ ~ CLEARWATER. ' L-- EX. `dER17Cld TC X Ex. ',/ERlzol~ ro REM1aIN. X ti~ ~ I~~ I ~ 5 10/17/06 IssuEa ' _ S ~ll~~' i I ~ 1/~~.I/a'I' jS 'h~l-~ a~ ? g 11 /02/Ob RC COMMENTS 7 8 II ' ~ PRELIMINARY SET ~ ' a 1 NEW BAN M,H. TOP, 1.3 N~ 2 - - I i ~ TOP.34(~~\ O _ _ O ~ i ~ PERMITTING SEf ~ ll iii ^ , . ~ 15' r ..f: - _ _ V ~SLL-~-.__-.~ I ly~ X15"'• 1~ 'S~ _~5• ~ -~5- 'S-=• _ _ _ ~I. ~ J i i 1 - ~ ¢ GATE wnu ' -~f~a ^~4 z - ~ ~,'Ig"'"; ~.'~°~~_.>C [ • e o ® z~ ElG FT. HARRISO _s_~ ~ n~S~A~~ 5„ i5.. e o o e e o e e e - NEW 6'H New7r7~ I-, - -a. 7tl, _ WOTELTO REMAI 3 i ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION SET _ _ _ _ I ~ o ~-12• ~ _ - ro~~.y° ~ ,o WHITE - - z - _ N,N, II MARKING N °f•P G N Ex.P I L ~ _ J ;N METER ~ 1 N- - ~'`~F~~"=E N PA E E METER ~ ~Jr = 5" = ~ 1az' ~ s V M N = ~ ~_ELEVATEp • • N N N ~ ~ n" 4, _ __G_ECK- - _ - mar ~ ~ i I ' ~y ~ 7P 12" 3]• _ = Ek. CAEA4: IIIrr' ' I ~ N _ _ - 7~'. I ~ SEC / TWP / RGE R1A~i0 _I~._I I ~ ~ - - J OOMP _ I ,5• - m,2.D ; sTER - - -NEW ~I, ~ ~ EX. 6' GREEN VINYL ~ 16 ' 29S ' 15E u,F.. ~ ~ _ JO REMAIN C. qq ,a• ~ s''' - 4' ~ s ~ '>s 1 I PEDESTRIAN ~ % CHAIN LINK FENCE ~ ~ TO REMAIN. EX.9.5" L FENCE PINELLAS COON In O ~.,4" 07=°0 ~ ro; m"~~~'. !6, ~ e e o r ~ 2 STAR AHEAD SIGN > FROM EX. VINYL C/L NEw EP#; 7 m.;a , ER1 ~:..,R'~~~ ~ m • e e e o e e o * II gg CABANA i P W S y' a =5~.5' ci 38TORYCONGOMINIU ~ unnaw c n°°naiq~LELL'L T.,t,,:•,~T f ,rourmax (I ss° I o I P~JSeLEV.=33.25MeuapwG V LPV ,r<x' FLASHING i L_ I IWY FENCE TO BACK OF ~cn jl ~ NEW WALL (SEE ;C1-- ' }a,5818.F. Es.u' °ooe®e°oo o®oe zN v - - ~I . YELLOW., _ 0 74' .J._.. I. 'I PINELLAS COUNTY DETAIL) _ - 2x, I -P I _ _ - .LIGHT - 1a ~ I ~ - - I PARKING GARAGE Permit No. Exp• Date ~;T -a.. J Jfi ~ 12.0 i O>PJ ca I 12 ,E NEw s 2.C;. ~ ~ v ° NEW 6 CROSS 8' CROSS s FLD 2006-04019 IEVA ~;2,x ~ ~,z' = oECrz : ~a y, a E,d' ~ ~ . EW YIELD WALK W/ - _ Ex.Drrc-sT W/ clev ~ ~ I ~ HERE TG PAVER FIELD - PEDESTRIAN y AND 12"GONG, ~ FIELD IL,_I I i' ~ D ETAI L A FLD 2002-07019 12"GONG, - I SWFWMD 46024044.000 Sept 17, 2007 eP _ _ s IGN a ° _ HEADER CURB, .R CURB, I N w~, , z I m ~ 5, 1C, I~ nem ~amanmawuz o o e • ~'1T' 14' er 75•'7 ~ I na mx o - I - i - I, N.T.S. f I 7' 75'"x' 20~ C~~ w~., 1... ~P rt-- \ . ..ter. - _ _ _ _ - , i.- =it- Y.~. .r-T_._~:---~.--R aTx~E-n-- , _ I -t- i Project Name ~ 4'~'h--"~_~ -.tea' oy d - ~ - ~ Ek. 1' NIASD[JRY lCALL m _ ~•,Ir,~• ~'IL "#A °°e I X A1H.D ~ '~FJO Rio:, -'~o~.:.-~,.~,,. ,,,ir'.,,6,~.,. .~,/I. ex.sara~ I EX. E' N!JYI. C/L FENCE TD REMNPI I ,p fx. a"Y wYiA,eY SMt.91 1~' MH. - - - - ~ • ~~I • IN. LEGEND ewe. o~u. ~o.Ia,° n~., o~.. ~ , II j, J• , ` ,e. r%. G' CHAIN !INn FEIJCE 10 REMAIN--J _ _ _ ~ •d rv ~X. 54A' M.H. _ , - / - I OAK COVE I I s+K 8.D7 E PINELLAS COUrJ I RJV.28.17Y/ I I ~ I I _ _ ~ ~ e'~ ra" s° o, ° ,,?ss2 Z LEYEL PARKING I ~ I _ _ EX.PK METER TO I - 4LEVEL PARKING CORE NEW INa 72,11 NW AECOROeo EA2F11Exr ~ I Araulrteoeerort2eorNa P! .J F L L A S C U U N T Y I 8E REMOVED Ex.¦xPENCmoT 3FP - COORDINATE W/ RM o Eo° , ! ; i / REDEVELOPMENT DINATE w/ - L~.~~,a„°nm°n ~~E~ArEw. P A R I(I N G G A P A G E I kEVIAIN arr To REMaYE z In PARKING SPACES - REM04E 2 II- / % & INTERIM u ~ 5 - fi- / ~ - - i?j~ , I AND METERS • NEW YIELD r • HERE TO L ~ j OFFICE USE - PEDESTRIAN .FDC - - 'I scN NEW BUILD. ADD. NEW PAVER BRICK NEW TURF BLOCK EMAI ~ ~ N _ a ° Project Address N.T.s. SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE ~ - ~ - _ 4 ~ a a ,a SIGHT VISIBILITY r~ J I - NEW 6 H In L ' N0. STRUCTURE TYPE TOP ELEV. INU. ELEV. \ ~ _ In ~ ~ ° a TRIANGLE 21 O SOUTH PA~ICINC - I WHITE _ LC)- FIRE PROTECTION NOTES: MARKING ~~r . Lr~._ - ~ ~ ~,4 ~ 'e.` (TYP) OSCEOLA AV. NEW MANHOLE slcu ON ~ 32.0 29,55 S+E 1 CITY INDEX 302 20F3 - T PAVEMENT ~ FUTURE ELEVATION DECK NEW SCORED CONCRETE N - 0 EY BOX TO BE INSTALLED FOR # NiW FH ~ KNXK , ~ CLEARWATER EMERGENCY ACCESS SECURITY NEW MANHOLE _ ~ ____.If, 31.5 29.19 E+W AT GATE PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL I 2 CITY INDEX #302 20F3 - a - . ~ ~ " ' ~ NEW S/W PATTERN AND COLORS TO 20~ 20f' `1 FLORIDA 33755 f rl~ ~ I MATCH EX PATTERN ADJACENT TO INSPECTION. - - LOCATION BY CITY FIRE INSPECTOR. ~ r SITE, IN FRONT OF COUNTY PARKING I 3 NEW MANHOLE 32,4 INV. 28.52 E+W - I- ~ - INSTALL A NEW NO PARKING, FIRE CITY INDEX #302 2oF3 - I TO THE SOUTH, SEE DETAIL SHEET ' 06.1 Drawing Title DEPARTMENT CONNECTION" SIGN,AS NEW a _ SHOWN ON PLAN. EX. MANHOLE 28,04E I PEDESTRIAN 4 32.8 28.11 W - I AHEAD SIGN r ii- I GRADING, TO BE CORED NEW 28.11 NW I PLUS r $ i I i SURVEY DATUM NGVD 1929 I~ L_ _ I STAKING & - =1 I FLASHING ~ , t- a TRAFFIC SIGN SCHEDULE _ ~ 1 , YELLOW ~ - r SANITARYSEWER PIPE SCHEDULE ~ ~ UTILITIES SITE MUTCD - - LIGHT r „ _ 6 I DESCRIPTION € a REF r QUANTITY LINE LENGTH (Fi) SIZE (IN) .TYPE SLOPE % - ~ I- I ~ I SCALE:1"=20' a I__ L_ o PLAN W11-2 2 - - PEDESTRIAN ~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ I 2 72.6 8 DIP CL.50 0.5 _ r Drawing Number nurnn w~c_n.. ~ ~ : EX. SIGN 2 - 3 135 8 DIP CL.50 0.5 i STOP R1-1 4 YIELD HERE TO R1-5 2 PEDESTRIAN 3 - 4 82 8 DIP CL.50 0.5 CROSS WALK DETAIL IL 20 0 10 2 0 40 C3ml ORIGINAL N.T.S. NOTES: SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS TO BE INGS TO BE RECEIVED IN ACCORDANCE W/ MUTCD LATEST EDITION. )ITION. Nov 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ' tEtM a BOLD MASONRY wALL w~ a' eABE i 8' WRtRXiF11' RON *NOTE* aRUwaitKmPlmY » EL EW 6' BlA N CK NE ' - NEW 6 BLACK METAL FENCE P( MG DEV OPER NEw ucHT ALL WORK INSIDE - J''POLE (TYP) TREE CANOPY TO BE: 1 DT METAL' FENCE , - SA VA JM . . JM b 167 3 64 15+. 1 " 'DONE BY .HAND ~ 15" ro 1 ¦ 11 „ 1 \ 36 25 WAL ~ 1 ~ 15° 15 15° n WALL ; . 1 7 11 a , : i~ LP r .r ¦ ¦ ¦ a riss~i le,t J ! L ¦ . ~ Z .....o......-.. _,12'.8 ..8 5 , ~ o ~ a ¦¦s¦¦~ INSTALL - 's ~ Q , PC ~ ~~„~,,,yn„ , 11 . ~ ~ NEW LP I ~ • ~ , . ~ u ~ - ~ NEW EX, 6" n n e p oo ~ ~ a N C u 4 2 : , . •r : ' SECURITY CONC, CURB tt ` • :.a'• `DATE TO REMNN I G , n SP 9 9 e s ID 9 9'X18, o 0 0 0 0 ~ Q' Z gF ~ H M \ 1 n, . 47 2 , 9X18 op 25 0 NEW' o 0 0 - ~ Q . ~ M~~~ o TUR o 0 0 0 ~ Q c+~ ~ N L: 23" 145 NEw sw U . „ n. NEW WODO FENCE JM ~TYP. V BLOCK QV ~ N u''. ~ ~ v' . 1 5 NEW NEW Q 1. ~ ~ U. 1.EVAT;Ep STRAIGHT ~ 14 ° SA ~ CURB ,,.NEW 10 P,V.C, LANDSCAPING 1 ~ 81GHT ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ISLAND(8'Xi 8') NEW ID ~ < wwciwtn N ~ L11 0 : ~ C ~ 1 s 3 ROOF DRAIN Y STCURBHT -NEW 31' PAt ~wFm A!O z Q U O? ~ ~ " K~ EX, GREASE ?Q$ 5 n ~ TRAP 4 .,::h;:;. 2 NSW ~a ~ To ~ • • : vA C . v VA INTERIOR PS PC ca~ga ~ ~ ¢ a 0 _ •p . TENT ~ _ • EXISTIN ; . • 23 y 12,0'. UMPSTER ,,,,,A 33 FLAG POND ~ . " . 0 REM •',~:;a`" Pod ~aG 23 QU LANDSCAPING 2 1 B~Dt-Ar~ w ~ W M ~ ~ POLE 1 i ~ U 'o ro ~ ' REMAIN _ 125.8' a • 1 9 N ; t:Nt:Re : 2 NEW „ .5 N 1 N LANDSCAPING 2 NEWAIN e ~ SA 9X18' SP 32 ~ ~ 4NDSCAPING a VA O 3 2 Q 3 E%. CONCRETE L L ISLAND p TO REMAIN 1 ~ L LLL , ISLAND 38 U ~ ¦ 1 ~ 6 L I_L~LLI I I I I I I LLLLL _ , (8 X18 ) s ~ W ~ u4LLLE NEWLOSSr _LLLLLLLL • ~ ' ' ~ (8'X18) HP TA _ ~ ~ a~ ~ o a~ a ~ o ~ ~ m ti.LLLI ADDITION _LLLLLLLL 1 ~ Q• NEW ELEVATOR ~ LP~ ~ sHa~AOOmo L+-LLLE(ssss,F,tsT _LLLLLLLL ,~v,,,~.,,,.,,. ~`s:,•:,' j= M; - ~ a T T ~ 35 K u I 0"9,5 U m .LLLLIFLOORORL _LLLLLLLI :~.a:.,.:•.,; •i' r ^i" 1 V 770 79 FLaDR ~ ~"u i . Z 3STORYGO 88S.F. ~ LLLLLLLLLI „L, /W.:' 'c,:,,,:',,ft :::v; .a:•:e•;..•. v Flt BUILDI - ILEV°-33.2 ~ F v ENGINEER OF RECORD q 5 , . 5 ' REq =14 58 ' ~L~, ooaoo~~ DT ~ 1 , ~ VA BN ::.;r. n „ o UA SA VA SA MG • - , to ~ N 1 12 ~ 4 ,;.i•,; 1 ° ~ I 46 NEW ui 23 ~ VA 23 tl'~ 3 43 14 s'x1a' 3 1 e~;. ~ Z ~m W 12,0 INTERIOR M MG ~a': . ~ 67 LANDSCAPING .1 3 , " ~ t•, V W°'"~ * NEVI/ , 2. Q ELEVAT~D ' ~ y. ' QV LANDSCAPING QV PM N a w n m ~ z 1 ISLAND 1 1B oHr O ~}mz ~ c`"n . r . 33.9 6.8' 1 DEC NEW (8X18') : NEW ~ TAIA UA ~ ~ _ ~ E ~ 5 ~ 5 N EX.ONF- STORY N ~ STRAIGHT INTERIOR 5fi 39 ~ Z a $ N ~ LANDSCAPING cuRB QV MG SP W F ~ ~ a I. ~ REG. WAS. NEW • • ~ M G of Ntw a I11A80tAY I D ~ ~ 8Y NEW GAZEBO _ NEw ~ EW,.. ~ IC , • 3 4 suomc eEw wuf. tittaoauRe 1 I D N ~ ~ ~ °a w , ~ r!r OR 8, -GATE - - I WORKING C NCE uNE sG~ G - - 24 14 ~ I'~ o ~ °z ~ a) ~ W KING C~F~0.RANCE LINE I ' ' T'Q • ' ~ Y Wro W O ~ Ur BF i • O16 ~ I II IG O 9X18 4 17 G •i'•:.:.:' ~ 0 ~a ¢W ~ NEW COOLING TONERS _ ~ ~ . r " 128.7 TO REMAS W 4 r~ 21.3 1 „ 1 t I I I +w .I . n~ ~ ~ ~ 38 {TYP.) e~~ 9`X18 PM o .y Ea'a~ar~ n.~ d ar=- = S~ n PADMOUN = II 2 1 1 „ nnMauN unun bA , n •15 O nun xFRMR ' ~ ~ PAOMOUN ~ , . + 6 o a ~ I- raeep~ ~ ~ o ~ DUN unurr ~ EMERGENCY 0 ~ . J ~ a'e Y I I XFRMR I GENERATOR ON BASE r~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 = r` ~ LJL F- ~ ~ II 12 4 1 • , ,1 FRMR 120 208 ~ ~ .1 O 5 5 7 i 120 208 TYPE FUEL TANK e~ F Zr ~ a z - - - DT N~WF v to ~ x 5 1a1• ~ 18 4 ,C 1 ~ J~=a ~ Y 3 ~U3. a FEw ~ Boo MAtTOfitY ~ ~ o r. ~ ~ VA EX: 1' MASONRY WALL, , • 2a PC BF , u „ u n - , a a a ' 1 ~ WALL W/ 8' BABE i S' ~ N U a ~ 10 7 168 77 >rX. 6 VINYL C/L FENCE TO REMAIN 1 1~' ~10 ~10 ``10 ~10 ~ic10 1011.5 10~jc10.5 ~ ~ ~,t I NU L. IBY OTtBt81 ~ ~ I 13 iv , EX. 6 CHAIN LINK FENCE TO REMAIN [ i C I N ? ? COL, ?COL. ?COL COLD ?COL. Ll ~ y „ - 15 Cf;~, ' Date issued: 04~20~~6 ~ ~ PINELLAS COUNTY ~ 11 , ~ ~ Project Number: Q6-09 ~ s~ 2 LEVEL PARKING Designed by: - ` KR I~ 4 LEVEL PARKING PINELLAS COUNTY Drawr;b: AZ PARKING GARAGE Revisions: I-- FJf, VERIZON TO REMA , VERIZON TO REMAIN. - No. Date Description. 1,-D~~ 1 04f28fOb CITY COMMENTS HANDICAPPED SIGN rsEE INOE:t No. n9 2 Ob/21/Ob SCHEMATIC DESIGN . STAND. srANDARD PRE-PANTED rt 3 08108/Ob FIREACCESSCOMMENTS DISABt DISABLED PARKING SIGN TREE, .PALM & SHRUB PLANTING NOTES wHITE BORDER ON 1/ &.SYM8OL ALUMIt ON 1/8" THICK SHEET caNa wALK RAMP DOVM conc. WALK 4 08f30f Db DRC SUBMITTAL. ALUMINUM SEE JNDEX N0. 109 ' S O9fO5f Ob CITY COMMENTS I BLUE BACKGROUND I' 1:. THE ROOT. MASS FORM OF EACH TREE PROPOSED FOR 4. IF ON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUCH THAT SOIL AMEN.)MENTS fNSTALLATIONSHALL BE. BALLED OR BURLAFPED: BARE- ROOT TREES ARE WILL BE' NECESSARY, THE PLANTING .MUST 1N000DE SOIL MIXTURE. 01 r _ 6 09f05fOb CITY COMMENTS PARKING BY ° NOT ACCEPTABLE. ALL NUNBIODEGRADABLE WRAPPINGS WILL BE REMOVED .THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SECTION OF-EACH PLANTER AREA TO A EaLacK BORDER . STRIPEE(ttPICAL)GLUE W10E TRAFFlC WHITE ~ 1O/17fOb ISSUE3 BE FOLDED DOWN .TO ENHANCE .WATER ABSORPTION.. DISABLED AND BURLAP WILL pEPTH CONSISTENT: WITH THE ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED IF WIRE BASKETS ARE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH BALLED AND & LEfFERS PERMIT ~ WHITE BACKGROUND .ONLY STRIPE (TYPICAL) BURLAPPED TREES THE.F'IRST'FEW ROWS OF EACH BASKET SHALL BE PLANT MATERIAL. ~ ~hv7 8 11102IOb DRC COMMENTS REMOVED AT THE TIME OF .INSTALLATION. 5. PLANTERS ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREAS MUST 13LADK E1oaoER $255 FINE' TRAFFIC WHiTE :SUPPORTING AP ARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED- AFTER 1 COMPLETE BE CONSTRUCTED SUCH THAT LIMEROCK, ASPHALT, CONCRETE OR .ANY & tETTERS F,S. 318,14 °i 2, P SYMBOL LEGEND BOTANICAL. NAME COMMON NAME REMARKS QUANTITY WHITE BACKGROUND ° T'. Q PRELIMINARY SEA GROWING SEASON:, ALSO THE'FLEXIBLE ATTACHMENTS SHALL BE USED OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS DO NOT. EXTEND UNDER THE SURFACE INTO. WHERE SUPPORT WIRES `ARE ,WRAPPED AROUND TREE TRUNKS/STEMS THE PLANTING AREAS: ? 10' HEIGHT AT ALL LEETERS 1 1" TO` PREVENT CAMBIAL DAMAGE. e~ . 6 2•. t" SERIES "C" w N o ~ ' b (tt~lc ° jE _ ~ PERMITTING SET QV Quercus virgmiana LIVE OAK PLANTING. AND 2.5 ~ S SSOCIATED WTH PROPOSED TREES..MUST BE SLOPED -6. THE PRACTICE OF'.TREE TRUNK WRAPPING AND.THE APPLICATION OF ~ ~J CALIPER ~ ~ CONSTRUCTION SET - 3, PLANTING HOLE A I .PAINTS TAR :ONTO PRUNED TREE,.BRANEHES IS NOT RECOMMENDED 2" HOT Dlf (NOT COMPACTED) AND A MINIMUM.OF 18-24 INCHES WIDER THAN / 10 HEIGHT AT 2" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE 60• : SOC OF ARBORICULTURAL. Ma nolia randlflora SOUTHERN AGNO I . t STANDARD BY THE INTERNATIONAL IETY - MG 9 9 M LA ING ND .5 12 y. -THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH. PLANT A 2 "?j~ 5,_O. wl I '~~71?:A CALIPER THAT.THE .TOP OF THE.-ROOT MASS IS LEVEL .WITH THE SURFACE: OF 7; P(:EASE NOTE THAT THE. USE OF FERTILIZERS DURING PLANT 1D HEIGHT AT t ;i•.`•', ~ r•:.`••,.` THE PLANTING HOLE,. TREES SHOULD BE INSTALLED 3 - 5 INCHES INSTALLATION IS NOT :APPROVED: SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE INDICATES ~b•~ ~ 7,~ . < SEC / TWP / RGE . ON ANNG CLAY. A 2 - 3 INCH LAYER.OF E AP LIGATION OF NITROGEN , ~ pC Prunus carolinianp CHERRY LAUREL PLANTING AND 2.5 10 ~ ,6 a .";;;:F"''~~' , ABOVE GRADE- ON SITES C T I I • THAT FERTILIZATION (SPECIFICALLY TH P } llrt` ~ SU F CE ~ HIB TS OOT i CALIPER C'~-' 1"+ ! ' ORGANIC MULCH MUST ALSO BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE R A TO TREES/SHRUBS WITHIN THE FIRST' GROWING SEASON IN I R ~ ~ III- a; I ~ a: =1 I I - ..I - aX26 e"X2'-E" CONCRETE MASS. 16.29S 1.15E OF EACH PLANTING HOLE, TO PREVENT FUNGAL INFECTION MULCH GROWTH. 10' CLEAR AND - •e e - FINISH TO1 •DT Phoena dactlilfera DACTYLIFERA PALM rr~~ ~ ' 8 CK A FEW INCHES FROM THE BASE OF EACH TREE. STRAIGHT TRUNK n - ' ' WITH A sL .SHOULD BE PULLED A a In _ - , N FINISH TOP OF MASS .LEVEL 2' (TYPICAL) ~ P I N E LLI'1S LIO U N I i ro WfiH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH 1 ° s'-o" - • • .I ~ ~ , I APPROXIMI I• APPROXIMATELY 1/2' ABOVE 1T-D' d - , i i° , - LEVEL DF 10'. CLEAR AND , a• i i a•• LEVEL DF TURF/SOD.. NOTE: ®RIGINAI. - - SA Sabal palm SABAL PALM STRAIGHT .TRUNK 15 .a ,a All pavement markings. to be thermoplastic. ~ECEIUED Permit N0. Exp• Date.. N TREE REMOVAL CALCULATIO '1~f y~- FLD 200b-04019 HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL ~ ~ n / v., ~ m ~ Betula ni ra RIVER. BIRCH 2 CALIPER f . VED REPLACED = 23 BN g E3' HEIGHT 4 ~ ` ~a ~,U ~ q 9 200 FLD 2002-07019 NUMBER OF.PALMS TO: BE REMO / , .INCHES OF TREES 't0 BE .REMOVED/REPLACED..= 64 ~"`r• , PLANNING DEPi~RTIMENT SWFWMD 46024044.000 Sept 17, 2007 TOTAL. 64 TO BE REPLACED _ 64'= 26 NEW TREES REQUIRED 36" HEIGHT N DETAIL CITYQFCI:EARWATER SP C cas revoluta SAGO qT HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL PROVIDED 32 TREES AND 23 PALMS. , v PALM PLANTING, 3s o.c. 5 • Philodendron 3' MIN. HEIGHT AT LANDSCAPING NOTE.. P5 PHILODENDRON 2 CROWN SPREAD NOTE: AIL TREE STAKES AND SUPPORT WIRES sellaum PLATING. WILL BE REMOVED AFTER 1 COMPLETE PfOiect Name GROWING SEASON.. PAuED 'VEHICULAR IJSE "AREA: 26,949 S.F. cROwN SPREAD - PVA = 2 695 S.F. PLANTING H30GH0 CT MIN.` INTERIOR :LANDSCAPE .COVERAGE- 10% OF PM, JAPANESE YEW. 60 NOTE; Au. TREE STAKES AND SUPPOR NOTE: ALL TREE STAKES Qi1K CAVE E 5rAKES AND SUPPORT WIRES AND SUPPORT WIRES WILL Far Cabbage Palm ineiollatiom Far Cabbage Paimx r~ INTERIOR LANDSCAPE PROVIDED = ' 5,539 S:F, _ 20.6% - Podacarpus macrophyllus TREE-JEW PINE MAX. WILL eE REMOVeD AFTER 1 CAMPLETE GROWING SEASON. . !ED AFTER 1 CAMPLLIE BE REMOVED AFTER 1 7rlm NI Fronde at lima NI Trunks to be Smooth and T DN.. COMPLETE GROWING of Digging and Planting ' NI Bum Morka Brushed Away REDEVELOPMEN 1 SEASON, For. Washington Palm Installagon: For Washfngtan Paime: 'Leave Inalde row of Fronde . Leave all boots on trunk Tk up wlih 6ladagmdaNe {¦bw uT 1 18 fo 24" HEIGHT AT ~r~~r Ilex aornuta CHINESE HOLLY n . 205 Remove Dead and Injured. 20 Loyere Burlap Pad at & IN 1 ERIIfI Twigs, Trim Na Leaders, Support Caniact r Na IRRIGATION NOTES IC PLATING 36 O.C MAX ~ Remove Dead and Injured and Injured = Retain Natural Shope rn Natty In tree Waod Shwd~re, ~ 3/4" - 2 Ply Reinforced _ Wlre ne OFFICE USE is Twigs, Trlm No Leaders, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR:SHALL PROVIDE AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC' PERMANENT _ Retain Nawrot shape. P. Rubber or Plaetfc Hoae ~ ° N SITE PLANTING AREAS,. THIS SYSTEM W W y 14"-24" HEICt}1T AT ~ 3 4" - 2 PI Reinforced . IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO COVER 100% OF ALL NEW 0 . ~ VA 5hefflem arboricola ARBORICOLA PLANTING. 30 O,C. AIN BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO THE fOLLOWING: 94 Rubio°' or Plaetm Naee SHALL CONT ~ Trinette MAX, - White S rveyore Tagging 2` x 4' Brace etlo¦ Pine Reinforced ~ White Syrveyara Tagging r lY ) Fie Nose Tape, 6 Length . Space Throe of 120 Typkgl Tapa, 6N Length. s To in ~ Remove after one grow(ng season. °o° g9 9 3 - 12 Guags Galvanized Wires ~ 2' x 4' Slake (Yallaw Pine) °°o Spaced 120 Nound Tree on rnrae Faet Long o 0 3"_Minimum MUlch PrOj2Cf Addr@SS 1: UNDERGROUND PIPIIJG; SHALL BE PVC.SCHEDULE 40 OR BETTER. - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14"-24" HEICtNT AT a- 12 cuo a cmvanlzed Wires Galvanized Wires Set At A 45'Mgle With 3- ~ 68 Remove after one rowin aeaeon. ound Tree an Duckbill Mehoro Or Equal 9 . 9 2. SEVEN. (7) DAY PROGRAMMABLE TIME CLOCK TO ACTIVATE ZONES.- 0°0000 0 ID Ixora duffii TRINIDAD FLAME BUSH PLANTING, 30 O,C, 8 spaced 12O~roundTreean MAX, 4 Set At A 45'Angle Whit 3-.~ 68 gle With 3-. fib Remove after one growing aeasan. Sauaer Rim 21 O SOU 1 1 1 a or Equal ~ 3" Soil Saucer. 4 Min. Mound Ta Fartn Saucer _ Flnleh Grade 3. .SPRINKLER HEADS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TYPE OF PLANTING. coNCRETE CURBING Duckblli Anchors Or Equal ' - ~".Minimum Mulch La er Remove Contains Q(~C -Mound To Form Saucer c y 3' L6nimum Mulch ~ Frain ROOtbOll O V V L.O L/'1 AV¦ 4. ELECTRIC VALVES Trachelos ermum 1 AL, MIN, a In. Mound To Form say . . TA • p CONFEDERATE JASMINE 24 O.C. MAX, 117 AsPNaLr ',ajt- y ~asminoldes -3' Minimum Mulch Ldyer aV Ramona Buddp From - - ~ Roatbatl; 16' tXnimum Wound Top. Of Ball Radius From Trunk Mln, 'se:,M,p, Planting Soil Mixture CLEARWATER 5. GAUGE 14 OF COPT: ER WIRE.. PAVEMENT` ~ -s' Minimum Mulch ROAD BASC~ ~ Remove Buda Fron - Remove Budap From - r Around Top Or Ball ,;:T~ Pl6nting Soil Mixture ~ - Washed-In and Tamped ' ' 6: FIBERGLASS', OR PLASTIC ZONE VALVE BOXES. 1 "-24" HEIG T AT Around Top og sail 4 u,,,, i ' Planting Soil Mixture D ~ P ~ D IH Rhaphiolapis indica INDIAN HAWTHORNE PLANTING. 30 O.C. PlanGnq Soil Mixturo Existing SOiI "rLORIDA 33755 . - Planting Soil Mixture. ` - ~ Eslatln Soll 9 7: WHERE PIPING IS ,UNDER. DRIVEWAY AND CONCRETE. WALKS, THE PIPES SHALL BE INSTALLED.. D . ~ D. MAX. 47 Provide o minimum 5'x10' - I IN. SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES 18" BELOW: GRADE. „ TREE STAKING & PLANTING DETAIL unobatmcted plantlng area IG DETAIL ~ . ~ 8• THE. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS TO .MINIMIZE SPRAY UPON ANY BF Ne hrolepis BOSTON FERN 12 HEIGHT qT ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT TREE STAKING & PLANTING DETAIL PALM STAKING $ PLANTING DETAIL SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL, prawingTitle IMPERVICIUS SURFACE, SUCH „AS SfDEWALKS AND PAVED AREAS„ p . PLANTING, 36 O;C. 445 N.T,S. N.T,S. N.T.S.. N.T.S. 9• THE. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS .SHALL .INCLUDE A. RAIN SENSOR/SHUT OFF DEVICE TO AVOID IRRIGATION DURING PERIODS OF:SUFFICIENT RAINFALL. JM Jasminum minima .DWARF JASMINE 1 GAL. MIN 1,075 24 O.C. MAX. LANDSCAPE 10. UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SHALL NOT: BE' INSTALLED WITHIN THE DRIPLINES OF EXISTING _ 51TE'PLAN TREES UNLESS ROOT PROTECTION MEASURES ARE. PROVIDED. TOR SIZE; DESCRIPTION, SPECIFICATIONS,' QUANTITIES OF EXISTING 11• RECLAIMED'WATER :TRACE BE USED FOR IRRIGATION. PURPOSES, LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SEE TREE INVENTORY REPORT; PREPARED SGALE:1 "=2Q' ON OCT: 21, 2004 BY: 12: MATERIALS SUPRLIED SHALL BE EQUAL TO THOSE MANl1FACTURED. BY RAINBIRD OR CHUG U L R CERTIFIED ARBORIST F -1235 KBTE, #L A, ~1 f-1 ~ ~I ~I 'APPROVED EQUAL BUTLER'S NURSERY, INC: 11 Drawing Number 13• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SYSTEM LAY-OUT ALONG WITH CATALOG SHEETS OF ALL 70.11 75TH ST. NORTH., PINELLAS PARK, FLORIDA 33781 COMPONENTS IN THE SYSTEM, TO THE OWNER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR. TO INSTALLATION. PH. 727-544-0445 FAX. 727-541-5027 14. THE ENTIRE SYSTEM SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ONEYEAR FROM THE 40 20 0 10 20 . DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE-OWNER. ' e-- Z LLJLU N , C= ® > LU eQ ~ u F F S10RAGE 0 0 _ PENTHOUSESUITE JUNIOR SURE JUNIOR SUFE ~ ~ ® D ~ ~ OmN3 4 rv ~ ~ rv NW N 0 0 E o ~ qNE NIND CU ® w~+ g E B 0 q°~ $ ONEBEDROOMSUITE 1WOBEDROOMSUIIE ONEBEDROOMSUFE NvNwa, rox¢aww may O $ $ $ $ $ N $ o qlq N NRtl N qN3 0 0 ® ~ d aq~ ® ® qq~ $ $ $ $ $ ww¢°aow Nnae~ N vnexn Nm¢a0we $ .INS, ° q~ BBINOM $ $ $ ®®a~ ~ ~ qNE NNq N s Q ~ qlq • rv ? f E a 0 0 pmw ~ $ $ maw 1O" PENTHOLSESUIfE JUNIORSIAfE JUNIORSUIIE ~ M1A°04 M1A90° ° ~ $ $ $ $ ~NNq, 0 0 ~ ~ I-~ IxE N qN3 q1O pWi as N $ N VAIEi , SERVICE - $ IE~I $ $ ® $ $ 0 iW0 BEDROOM SUITE TWO BEDROOM SURE ONE BEDROOM SURE , O O B 0 v SCALE: 1116" =1'•0" 91H FL6OR ONLY CLEANING EOUIFMEM STORAGE Q CQ A ~ A 0 ~ PUBLIC LINEN 0 o STORAGE KINGPARLORSUBE KINGPARLORBU(fE KING SUITE DOUBLE ROOM KINGSUIfE ONEBEDROOMSUIfE ~ UtUNDRY STeRAGE 0 PLR'AlC WLNDRY ON FLOORS 4IH, LINEN 5lORAGE ON F1O0R551H N z _ 7TH AND 9IH AND 111H ~ O NIN3 NN9 _ 0 CN0 ~ 0 0 q Nfq _ O $ - ~ $ PMaOA ~ $ D 0 0 0 ® o i o 0 gNN~9 $ $ mlNgw $ wncaQ7 $ $ mgNCN DOUBLE ROOM KINGSUffE KINGSUIfE ONEBEDROOMSLQE u ~ n $ O $ qw, 0 0 N,NEI 0 o N,~ - Iw $ J ~ µq HO1EL SfOpAGE N.~ ®mINNw °m,® l'J ® ® ® IdiH, BIN, 10IN qHD 12IN qqX& wxm FLOORR nrnv ya raNas a um ewe NWiXFErvE y_h:~ ,W mINNw quWPl $ WARS ~ MINN°A $ ~ AYARA vaa ggGV Y NAIW $ ~ Ogllpl $ $ 9~ $ q N%? S XINE ® ~ N~ _ 0 p •~N ~N ONEBEDROOMSUIfE ONEBEDROOMSUItE KINGSUIIE DOUBLE ROOM KINGSUIfE ONEBEDROOMSUFE "~1P B B O D O B ~ } 0 0 0 0 _ NINE ~ NINB Z ® qN0 NIµE qNE ~ ~ 0~ - 0 0 0 ~ ~ i~~ J I~ KINGSUIfE ONEBEDRObMSUIiE DOUBLE ROOM KINGSUIfE KINGSU1fE ONEBEDROOMSUIfE O B 0 O O B 0 0 0 ~ LE. 1 1 M SECURm' O O A D A O WIRING O O CLO~'f 0 ONEBEDROOMSUBE ONEBEDROOMSUIfE KINGSUIfE DOUBLE ROOM KINGSUIfE ONEBEDROOMSUIfE ~ N ~ 0 z I o rv elra Nllg ~ 0 Nxa i # ~ ~ NxE qra $ o~m° ~ o ~ 0 0 0 ~ ® w,NNE,®® $ $ MSU E mINN~O ~°°s DOUBLE ROOM KINGSUffE IONGSUBE ONEBEDR00 R agxmw, R Y~ ,N NNmgN ~ ~ ® $ $ ~ o 0 0 i 0 $ 0 0 qlq NI~ w~ $ ~ $ * I $ $ o p~ µµIq~ = O MNS9 ~ MINNpN O l% l,! N!°q ® mNNW $ $ NSn ~MTGt MINppN $ M,gC9 $ ~ MIA9Ep O 0 $ O 0 ELECTRICAL $ ROOM $ $ ~0 $ - qW NINE S NNi ® - NPq MIND 0 0 - 0 ? ry N 0 0 ~ $ o o °s~ENN~, 0 m,~a~N ~ q ~ ONEBEDROOMSUBE ONEBEDROOMSUIfE KING SUITE DOUBLE ROOM KINGSUBE ONE BEDROOMSUIfE m°°L° I°'~' "P40° 'Q $ pall ® $ $ an,oa $ B B O D O 0 L9 I 0 0 0 0 $ I I $ NA9 NMS `A^, Y)q YINE NME 0 0 'I O 0 ~ ~ ~ $ $ ~ $ $ J 0 0 KINGSUBE ONEBEDROOMSUIfE DOUBLE ROOM KINGSUIfE KINGSUBE ONEBEDROOMSUITE oA B D A A B 0 0 0 0 0 SCALE: 1116" =1'-0" Z~ O O D O 'B NOAM 0 0 BIAW BEWPoT/ ONEBEDROOMSURE KING SUITE DOUBLE ROOM KING SUITE ONEBEDROOMSUIfE ~o cxs xlroE D ® 0 0 YIW qN3 ~ Npg [IMd ? ? T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -,•m o ~ e ~ AFarmm~a x4loxrs M srvflounr¢.Y SIAFF EERRIWG umgxrAxfs SHOLL~ YFAIKA S Aq>~ ® ® ® ~ ® ~ ~ ffosm 6gHtOM 611NF+]M1 wu~ua ~ ~ ~ W'IYR0.9ff #NtO FW ~ lAluflWlF 36AfO RR IMDIM FBgI M0.YF AFNa MAIM A APygy MIAApq MIAAOq 9~EpNNG VFRnUI SF.V(fl PFM CN/ + + ® ® ® ~ ® FOUIPMEM ~ wa+f uo ARP afsrFgFss uM¢w ml¢s Rc Rv 610RAGF ~ 3 oa f%RMRx wF. FpEN9]M ~ ~sr ~ W n,< ~ SDR NIW gIM3 qN3 [W 0 AIMS NNN d MI9~ M@SA MlggCq STAR 4s 0 Y 0 0 EIECIfdUI FOWft6 10x96 ea ONEBEDROOMSUIfE KINGSUIfE DOUBLE ROOM bNGSUIfE ONEBEDROOMSUIfE x9usEAEEPNC ~g WOMEN ~ MEN pDMN9FFKE O pe RaR9 O OA OD OA OB SAUNA STORAGE oa . / 6fAM9 C99LgF G'i ~ ~ 6FNa 66VYX AfHM BWa ~O SCALE: 1116" =1'•0" I 1MFI FWF C9NfAIX ADOM WOOD DECK 40 SEgiS 2 SERVICE NEW ~ LOADING 0 EMRANCE AREA N VM1 W.1 NRY fLLVNLA6 a ® E ® a9iC NNGIAIE , 9AIApSPREP aanMawlns F ' ELEVATOR mA1gwu"w'~R swuiasm STAFF SHAEDD 9FFIce. A LOBBY WAAENWSNPW HDi PICN{V COLDPIa(+1P C90lER SCULLERY - ® O wLD PREP KITCHEN MEN9 1ERRACE FPSE~ 0 aq xoa laoa 16SEAT5 eEVEaaGE DsuEars Dav ® s~+~ sr9AAGE ~L' WOOD DECK wamENS ® p ® Fa9rvrpESa cagawa Mix+°~ow MENS WOMENS 0° x9s~EUmpsHRa RE5iR00 RESTROOM "Me ' OAK COVE RESTAURANT • 125 SEATS O ? O LOBBY MECHANICAL ROOM `g'am GIFT V Q snv+a ~ 0 "~7 ~ ~`r' ~ SHOP GREEN AREA ~ ? ? ? ? BL6INESS MECHANICAL ROOM& WOOD DECK 24 SEATS ? CENTER MWMENANCE OFFICE 00 0~ o¦ o¦ SIDEWALK GREEN AREA SCALE: 1116" =1'-0" iii i i i , -?-- - -I-- - -i- - 'III-u --'le I. :. 1-a ., I, .. I CONSTRUCTION -PENTHOUSE PLAN BCALE: 1f8' n 1'-0".. NSTRUCTION -PENTHOUSE ROOF PLAN CO BCALE: 118" n 1'?0" Y OTES SHEET NOTES KE N ?? ?. ?.,?, ?h? Zowss?taw s?wo Church of Scientology . i ti O _._.? o, os/23/os ?d, on rgan za Flag Servic® ...ISSUE FOR SCHEMATIC DESIGN Tekphane 202.T21.520D ' ? S ® ® A RE: PROJECT MANUAL AND CONSULTANT DWGS FO Q MEP DRAWINGS 40 14 NEW ELEVATOR RELIEF FAN REF. EE 10 A10 IN RMATION ` 02 oe 16 os / / FacaimBe 202.BT2,6587 n 503 Cleveland. Street : / . , ADOI110NAL : 01 NEW ROOF DRNN (SEE. PLUMBING) S FO ISSUE FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 33755 ' Clearwater, FL 15 NEW EIWAUST LOUVER REF: MEP DRAWINGS ' BO ALL EIOSIING CDNDI11DN5 NEED T0. BE ELEVATOR OVERUN - '2 NEW 0 O 03 10/17/06 - . :. . .. FlElD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CON5IRUCTION ISSUE FOR COORDINATION IP-?? , 3 NEW LADDER SEE DST. 15/A1O.11 i6 NEW FORR WT WAIL, AT CMU WALL. . no ti O k Co R 4 NEW STEEL COLUMN AND SPRAY oN FIREPROOFlNG. REE S1RUCIURAL 17 SEE A 10,00 FOR STAIR INFORMATION O va ons e D ve. murognrm. I ? 05 NEW 4 PLY BUILTUP ROOF REF SPECS 18 ADDI110NAL CAP SHEET FOR COUNTER BALANCE : - O ? 6 6 000 09 04 FIXLOW ROOING MANUFACTURES RECOMENDATIONS, . . ?caorrx n. 6 NEW HVAC ROOF TOP UNIT. REE ME?I O . RO . A02- T 7 NEW MEP PIPING AND DUCTWORK REF: MEP DRAWINGS. , ' O • CONSTRUC110N PLAN, OMEP PLUMING VENT REF SEE DETAIL 11/A1240 ? -NOT FOR CONSTR ROOF. ??' 9 STAIRWEIl PRESSURE VENT REF: 61EP DRAWINGS SEE DST. • 8/h12.40 . . w,rr '?1 10 3 COAT 510000 ONEW COID FORMED STEEL STUD WALL W/ ?I? 8 D24 E1fTERIOR RE: SPECS , 11 E1gSTING STAND PIPE TO REMNN SEE 11/A1240 (?M) ? , . A02.R01 12 BLOCK OFF AND REMO4E E%ISTING S(RIPPER, COORDINATE W1TN NEW CONSTRUCTION AND FLASHING DETNLS ' - 13 ROOF AND PORTS-COCHERE BELOW O ? m0°0in? n n ? ,(1-, . ?1 u N ~ r n r n r u r n r u r n r n r u ~ 12-0 12-0 10-0 10-0 10-0 10-0 10-0 10-0 12 X10'-0" ~ 12'-0" ~ 12'-0" X10'-0" x,10'-0" ~ 12'-0" 12'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 12'-0" ~ 12'-0" 10'-0" 8'-0" ,12'-0" ~ ~ ROOF MACHINE ROOM - - - El, 165,33 TYP. TYP. TYP. 6 P. ~ _ 1 TYP. 8 TYP. - N 1 6 3 6 8 MAGNINE ROOM EL. 156.54 YP. :2.,:z:{ :{..:::-.71};'::{":f":!'•Y:K{":4N:v:•'•}}: ~ 3;.y1'~~\j :\%~tt,~ ti?~::;'ti l,'vR:>,{j:~J:2yi{:;?i iii;:.+:i+:<:'; ~yri.; {i;>r:{.; .}:i:;n::rxi{{•:or.;:r»•.:i{ta.;,+•a:;•) ROOF _ ` < } : - ;iLiij;: ::ti<S}i ~:i: l: nC: ri :tiv?:j :r:iFj}:? - _ N - :F. e.. Fi.{r { lne........: rvr 1 .mom v.~: :.}..r:, C•} _ ..rc:nY:nY:nY; { } EL. 147.17 ~ .:{:}:~.~<.:<:<:~:::{<;{<;:.:: { { r ~)::Y - LEVEL 13 ~ ' " • ::}:fii;::jS'vk:j:0itiitiii;: + .',C+Y<~$;;:?'{:~rti?.:: _ - ~ EL. 138.63 . }i:{. n.{•}: yr i:; :v:•,:•~i]} > ....v:n::s ..Y iY.{Y..:. •n••rnY•.Y::::.y:.kY:: ~):{{;~'ivr}]'r•}}}}::::. vn i~ ::j::jiv ~ LEVEL 12 - ::>:::>:<:v:>:<><:~:~.:<«<::«>.~:<:: c~ ~ . :.Y v.Y %'rj:?'t:j:{'f,.j;~:~::'y}: Y: .v.. '1.•;{5:15 r EL. 130.06 - :»:;::::~:;<;:;;::<:::«s>.":~;~.>::<: - ii:S:ii2:{:;;;?:$:y.`{:i;:j;72::i }?+:~:5 ,{::Ct::y;i n Y). l! h F 4 •/F.S~ijv.griv'J.:iil'lii; is 2 . I FI f+ l i iSF ~lY` )l;'if lf'~ JiF f kji'Ffl ~ LEVEL 11 . ~ ~ .::.,:>:::>.........f.}:..:<fff:::<:. + o v v _ 55:4;?5i: n::wi'j}%•j ?i;~Q:j'r::;:;'.:':.7:i::':;i; ± _ :....v S:f ` . EL. 121.49 • :::{:;:,:~<:>::{:;::::;:>:.:~::,::;:<;:.<::::::{: ° yv::., e... ~ ;y{:::5:?.5:~:: ;rj3:v'r;>:{;tiiit{t}.{i:>jj { ~ LEVEL 10 _ } } TYP. . EL. 112.97 ~;:,:a;•} •s>:~::~}}:<>:~:~ ip%'tiiF.ji::(:'):j::ji>isi::Y,.:}r:Q::i:>•~t~:j:~.l'Sj:S ~?':j:4:•:{.J. { {k } q:{{{: ;:.gin: {:jS:i:}:L:} is •vnv: r.•:n: { 5:4:;5 :::::n: n. v::" •.•r.V. r:n } )iJfi7:i:4:j::iti::tifiiii LEVEL 9 . - ~:};:<}''«<:;::~:;}:~:: ::5:{ 'ir.:.0yi'iri?; 4}::::,::::,:•,:•,::,tiiv°Cti::i::ii:yd'l.•Yr]Y.•]: EL. 104.46 ~ ~ • • co ' ` rc:: e:: t;x c{ { { { c... .a., titi \~Ei\:~\~ ~'~~.~}.Wf:iv~;o• Rv:hv ~ xSti'+'i.S;•:~;':it tti: LEVEL 8 i EL. 95.98 ::;.{:{..<.:.{:r::.:<{;{::{':5:{{{{{{: Q - ' NYC V.t. ;y},.y .},~y 4y •f Y 4}tVM1V}f V,\ + . ~ LEVEL 7 ~y i}Y•Y+;C?ri•+ 'Flv) :):jR:j G:;C•}jYd'r'~i~titi~j:•:v'~~'rtiti EL. 87.46 ~ < :v!> <<:~{<::>:~. ~ - cfl to ~ _ . :L}Y:Rvi~• }C%~C:t:;i}r'.:v .:+iri:Y:}:j~::*:~.{:i'.:}S. C . :•rixfi\i•} 1 ~S C • .•r.Yr: M• } pit n ; j t <; ' f< :c:i4n5y:5~%:i:>:oF;-:<y>ar:5f<y: ~ - ~ L L 6 {{{m{.kax::'t'f:}:o}:.,:a:•:{,•.,•ta:axoa, - EVE ~~~'{«<:;~.;:>~:::~::<;<:r:}{<{~:>:f::<. ~ o Six\•:O:;C:•1:N;q:{?•:Jr:• :j ihY•} Jn\tn;{n;{.};n:v'^}:•]:C{:q:~ • . Y:4:...;; ..r:«:r:r rn•}, Si:;},{yi:5: ~C;{i4 ::f.C F ; .i•::ti :y,.tiv':S':}RYvf::vGv}:•'.S{':ti9:ti f':IXi'.: J T_ . ;~:vt{r?:'i,:;f? yii!f:iili?• ;j`:ii51•j`ri7', 5 5 . % _ EL. 78.94 ::::.;:~~>;<~>}~:•:::::.i::gin:{.}:{:.:~: .i.,..S•.:i.:{.{C.i..i n..L. n .z}.,... C {{r.,;r - . . :y::f::jjj}:f};<;~J55$:,<:tfjY :vui:::0: i$m;'{{i:j : ):t}:::i}:i); ~ LEVEL 5 _ - C U h :i•.h I• f viv. I ~ EL. 70.36 {;>::<::::;;.;<:<:>:,::;}::::<}';:::}:;: ' . ::vr.::{{•r yYY.irigY.:i.{q...... r..........: }:{::{:•.:{G:{• : :0 LEVEL 4 EL. 61.79 ~ - ,':f :<:;:~};::,:}.::«:}:<:~:;~<«:;~:;:<_ Q ~ •:.:.f 5 J 6 •:i{iiC+i.{vr:i{{.} • ? +A }:C•'f.• :?YC{S CtiC:h:-0::~S:~rq:{. L:4 ~ LEVEL 3 ~ ti € {::A:::{:~<:::::<:~:::::::::::<: ~ ~t- - EL. 53.20 ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~r . , •:3ji,):;'+.:¢r:~a;;o:,5jjy>: j+:gja: ;rj:::fa::9:;f{;:2::Sj:4;:.:• ..Y W • . nvr .....i•::.,.~ I LEVEL 2 - ~ ~ wo • EL. 43.78 _ : ~ ° ~ - 2 - I - J 2 O + :i$:fiy;:j ~SSjfjti . ~ ~ ~ i:Y::{?;:G • . OPEN LEVEL 1 .:~.{.:.r}::. EL.33.36 ~ - - - - - NEW ADDITI N 5 2 4 4 4 --~4) 3 4 4 7 SCALE: 1/16" =1`-0" SCALE: 1116" =1'-0" N ~ r n r u r n r n r n f n r n t u r 12-0 8-0 10-0 12-0 12-0 10-0 10-0 10-0 10 X10'-0" X10'-0" X10'-O" X10'-0" ~ 12'-0" ~ 12'-0" X10'-0" X10'-0" ~ 12'-0» 12'-O" X10'-0" X10'-0" X10'-O" X10'-0" X10'-0" X10'-0" ~ 12'-0" ~ 12'-0" ~ ° ,I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ROOF MACHINE ROOM EL. 165.33 ~N 6 _ ; 1 6 $ 1 . ~ - 0-_ ~ ~ NEW ADDITION MACHINE ROOM 'TYP. TYP. C EL. 156.54 '~:<::<<<. . . 6 - - - - {{•}ii {i{• 0;4};{ - ~:i:'fi: ROOF - - - EL. 147.17 `~<< . ~ . 6 -I L EL 13 EV . 1,~ ~ EL. 138.63 - - . , • ~ ? EVE 12 - . - ° - L L EL. 130.06 ~ ~ ~ - - ~ . LEVEL 11 ~ _:<:~«:<::: • + a<.,:•> . ~ EL. 121.49 <::<~: ~ ~ ~ • ~1 J - LEVEL 10 - + EL. 112.97 _ - ,I, ~ LEVEL 9 - EL. 104.46 ~ - - ~ - ~o) LEVEL 8 vN,;<.<<~ 2 - TYP. ~ . EL. 95.98 } } : • - g ~ ~ . ~ ~ . - ~ Q / ~ 2 - LEVEL 7 :v:{.~::<: ~ ° - , Jc . EL. 87.46_ iv~J~ ,F 3 LEVEL 6 a<> ~ . . EL. 78.94 :::t:<{;<: ~ - ~ ~ ' LEVEL 5 - N r ~ r;- , EL. 70.36 ~ . . I~ ~ ~ - ~ LEVEL 4 . cn • 6 EL. 61.79' :.......;,5 . - ¢ :xf:Yid:::o ~ - _J c, 6 LEVEL 3 ~ . - . ~ ~ . :r>S . w F EL. 53.20 - - 6 J ~ n - ;I:. 2 ~ - ; LEVEL 2 . ;n, EL. 43.78 ~ ~ c~ o . i 4 _ a OPEN ...2. ~ LEVEL 1 - ' . 2. • - EL.33.36' -.~'Eyp~7~3 ~ IN l `j`IL ~ ®RIG 7 4 7 4 ~ RECEIVED , 4 4 4 I`2 yt I ~aD1~ 0 ~ 2~0~ f rV H l e CIT°f OF CLEARWATER SCALE: 1116" =1'-0" SCALE: 1116" =1'-0" LEGEND O1 CURTAIN WALL WITH LAMINATED GLASS. O3 3-COAT STUCCO SYSTEM WITH CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN O5 NEW PORTS - COCHERE (DOPERABLE WINDOW AT CERTAIN LOCATIONS. 4 PER FLOOR PAINTED FINISH SHOWN, WITH AC LOCK AND LIMIT STOP 4" PER FLOOR AS NEW LAMINATED GLASS WINDOWS STUCCO ON EXISTING CMU OR CONCRETE O2 NEW APPLIED STUCCO WITH WATERPROOFING, METAL MESH ONEW DOOR, FRAME, & HARDWARE. 6O HIGH DENSITY FOAM CORNICE WITH APPLIED STUCCO O9 NEW. EXHAUST LOUVER HURRICANE RESISTANT LOUVER. REF LOUVER. REFER TO AND 3 COAT STUCCO FINISH MECHANICAL PROVIDE Y2" REVEALS AS SHOWN ON ELEVATION 7O NEW WOOD DECK & RAILING NEW STUCCO ON LIGHT GAUGE FRAMING NEW HIGH DENSITY FOAM CORNICE i S~~AST I i j i i III . • R I I rraww vJ I 0 15 30 60 Narthwest corner of Lot !2, Block 12 Northeast camer of Lot' 2, Block 12, BASIS OF BEAR/NGS,• MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDI i/1S10N MAGNOLIA PARK SU801 ~1S/ON 8earings shown hereon are based upon the Plaf Baok 3, Page 43 Plat Book 3 Pa a 43 g Northeast comer of Lot a, Block 12, North right of way llne of Court Sfreet as MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION bearing 58934'54"W. 5893106 E. 350,00 Plat Book 3, Page 43 63' , 5aoa ~ , 0 DO I J I I 1 ' i I I I I I I I I I A9BRE19ATIONS I I I 1 (O) per Legal Aescrlptlon j I I I (PJ ~ Per Record Plat i I i I I I I I Ord. City Ordinance i i I I i No. ¢ Number i I I I i i i I I I i I I I i ~ Lor ~ i I LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4 LOT 5 I I a ~ I Lor s Lor ~ Lor a I I I i Lor a N ~ I I I w ,ry ~ ; I MAGNOLIA PARK 5UBDl ~1SlON I I ~ I ( 8 L 0 C IK 1 2 I a I I I I Lh:GAL DESCRIPTION: TRACT "A" N ~ I I i I , , Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 12, MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the map ar plat thereof as recorded o „ „I Q I I I `~J in Plat Boak 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, AND Lots 9,10,11,12,13,14 and 15, Block 12, o ~ I I ~ ~ o` ~ I I I I ~~c~ COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 52, Public h pp \ h A I I I lad ~C h I I q ~ Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: i ~ g ~i I I M ~ I i I _ ~ _ _-N . _ _ . _ _ _ _ I I I I ~ I Begin at the Southeast comer of said tot 9, then~._S.BQ°54'S4"V:1., along the South boundares of said l.ots.9,10,11,12, - _ . ~ I I . I I l5 Vacated Alley per Ord. No. 6839-Of I Q 13,14 and 15, a distance of 350.00 feet to the Southwest carnet of said Lot 15; thence N.00°0T48"W., along the West i ~ Q ( I I ( I boundaries of said Lots 15 and 2, a distance of 298.51 feet to the Northwest comer of said Lot 2; thence S.89°31'06"E., I 4 along the North boundaries of said Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, a distance of 1350.00 feet to the Northeast corner of said --I- -~------------I--_..____--__ _I_........__......_. ~ a Lot 8; thence SAO°08'01"E., along the East boundaries of said Lots 8 and 9, a distance of 295.05 feet to the POINT OF w _L___ I I ~ I I I " _ - - N ~ BEGINNING. ~ ~ I I ca A~ ~ I I w ~ Less and Except the following described parcel: R' W I I I I I ~ ~ I 1 I Begin at the Southeast comer of said Lot 9, thence S.89°54'S4"UU., along the South boundaries of said Lots 9,10,11,12, ' ~ I I I i A I I S~ 13,14 and 15, a distance of 350.00 feat to the Southwest comer of said Lot 15; thence N.00°07'48"W., along the Wsst I I l g boundaries of said Lots 15 and 2, a distance of 298.51 felt to the Northwest comer of said Lot 2; thence 5.89°31'06"E., I I I~ N.8954 54 E. 299.9 0 300 P I - ~ along the North boundary of said Lot 2, a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 2; thence i S.00°07'48"E., along the East boundaries of said Lots 2 and 15, a distance of 212.92 fret; thence N.89°54'54"E., a ~ I I I ~ distance of 299.99 feet to the East boundary of said Lot 9; thence S.00°08'01"E., along said East boundary, a distance of i CDURT SQUAR SUBO/ t4S/ON I I 85.10 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. I I B L Lor 1s I a C I K 1 2 I I I I i I I This parcel contains 63,427 square feet ar 1.46 acres, more or less. I I I LOT 15 LOT 14 I LOT 1 I 3 I LOT 12 I LOT 11 I LOT 10 I LOT 9 I I I I I 1 Fors I I I ~ I I ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACT "B" „ I I I 2~ I I I I I I I Lots 2, Block 12, MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, I I I I I I I Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, AND a portion of Lots 9,10,11,12,13 and 14 and all of Lot 15, I I Block 12, COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 52, i I I I I I I Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, bring more particularly described as follows: I 1 ~ I ~ i 50 50 50 ~ I ~ I 50 50 50 50 50' I Begin at the Southeast comer of said Lot 9, thence S.89°54'S4"W., along the South boundaries of said Lots 9,10,1'1,12, i 58954'54"W ...350.00' 13,14 and 15, a distance of 350.00 fast to the Southwest comer of said Lot 15; thence N.00°OT48"W., along the West boundaries of said Lots 15 and 2, a distance of 298.51 feet to the Northwest comer of said Lot 2; thence 8.89°31'06"E., Southwest camer of Lot 15, Block 12 ' POINT Of BEGINNING ~ COURT SQUARE SUBDII%SION BEGINNING along the North boundary of said Lot 2, a distance of 50.00 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 2; thence Plat Book 5, Pa a 52 ~ 5outfieast corner of La g corner of Lot 9, Block 12, SAO°0T48"E., along the East boundaries of said Lots 2 and 15, a distance of 212.92 feet; thence N.89°54'54"E., a COURT SQUARE SUBDIV Plat Book 5, Pa e 52 7UARE SUBDIVISION, distance of 299.99 feet to the East boundary of said Lot 9; thence 5.00°08'01 "E., along said East boundary, a distance of 5, Page 52 $5.10 felt to the PG"INT OF BEGINNING. ~Q ~ a~ g 2~ ~ r ~(v ~ ~I l ~ ' yoti 3 ~ This parcel contains 40,443 square feet or 0.93 acres, more or less. ORIGINAL„ 115'00~~~1 = 2~~~' RECEIVED i `1 ~,b21 ~I -y..~--hh4 ~ 0~~~~~,~~ QCT o6 zQp6 i ~ ~~r I ~ t. G ~ 9 a ~1G, 9 C ~ ta~'~~~- PLANNING DEPARTMENT I -~c 7~ ~~1~ CITY OF CLEARVYATER { 8~ `t°~ c~o;i'i~' PREPARED FOR: C of S Religious Trust i c~ 2~~'~f : za°~~ (n~~ti°~7~ ~ I ~I, ~ d o.~ A This sketch is not valid without the signott~re and original 0 3~, raised seol of a Florida licensed su~u snapper. 0 ~ o 4~t Eft ; i e ~ h`~` ~ o o WILSON Ml ~ ~ r,~ ~ 4 w U / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ i ~ r~~?( a,~6~ r ~ s. ~ ~ ~ ~ , ,j t~= ;r.., v~.~ ~ ~ .,~~.....r. .M_:~ . , , V. Q UC VtN t, akMi L h l»5wta t ' . lorida Surveyor.Tantc"p5489 EV# REVISION r 4-) DATE INIT/EMP# ACTIVITY INITLALS/EMP, NO. DATE ¦ ® Ixwrwua =MOM, ~ EV# REVISION DATE INIT,/EMP# x oerIM'oaaiw CLIEP PARTY CHIEF: PC/NO DATE CLIENT: ATE: TITLE: ~ EV# REVISION DATE INIT./EMP# DRAWN BY: J.G.C. DRWN/NO DATE 16 EV# REVISION C-OF.S_RELIGIOUS..TRUST HORIZOONTAL S NTAL SCALE: 1"=30' SKETCH-AND-DESCRIPTION EV# REVISION DATE INIT./EMP# CHECKED BY: S.E.S. DESGN/NO DATE Plar?m • &*eem • SwkgW • SweYa' s• Lands ArchOecb • t ~ cape Cmagant8 DATE INIT./EMP# F.B. PG. FBQOK/PGS DATE ~jgp PROD PROJECT: VERTICAL, SCALE: INDEX NUMBER: N 0 EV NO. REVISION DATE DRAWN BY EMP. N . NBpkv-Fort Aly4ra•Sarmola•Bradenton •T •TWahame N/A / o CHECKED By /EMP. No. WM APPROVED BY; 1bI awra" Dft Sub 40ON Tampa; Fic M 33602 • Raw 813-223.9 00 8p-223.0008 We"a wwwwdsanmjkrcom [ I- CHURCH-OF-SCIENTOLOGY NSA SEC; TWP: RGE: CROSS REFERENCE FILE NO.: PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER: rte" 16 29 15 CROSS 05573 1 0 ~ j FRANKLIN STREET I j 75' 75' 75.5' East 55' 63' S0' S0' S0' S0' S0' S0' S0' 15 -EAST ~ LDT 6 I ' ~ LOT , ' 30' 30, ? I ~ I I I o I I I ? I I I ~ ------JJI-------I I I I I I I I ~ 75' ~ I I I I I I I I I I z LoT ~ l e i Lor 2 I I ~ I " I I I h I o I I °0 Z Izl I I o I o I o I o I o I o I o I o --75~---y~~------1 Q I J I J I J I J I J I J I J I J D' ABBREVIATIONS.' Storm Sewer Dota,' Sanrtar Sewer Data: SYMBOLS fGEN , y O ' ~ ° F.LR. = found Iron Rod Stm MN 1 Stm MN 6 San. MN #1 ~ ° LOT 8 I ~ I LOT 3 I ~ ~ I I I MAGNOLVA PARK SIYBDI ~/S/ON °o # # Rim= 24,81 qll = Spot Elevat/on S.1.R. = Set Capped Iron Rod LB 043 RIm= 26.73 Rim= 26,70 /nv.S= 17.53 Z Iml I, ~ i I I B t p c KI 1 2 1 F,LP, = found Iron Pie /n v,N, - 23 02 lnv,N.- 16, 55 o _____~~~____~o°°~ of I I I I I I j a; 75' IWI I~' "~I I I I I I I I = Q = Oak Tree unless ofherw/se noted p Inv,E.= 20.63 /nu.S= 19.35 F.N.O. = Found Nail & Olsk San. MH #2 • = Palm Tree. = Stm MH #2 Stm MH #7 Rim= 26, 98 0 N.C,S No Corner Set = _ InuN- 1747 Rim 26.32 Rim- 26,79 Inv.S= 1747 ° Lors IQI LoT4 I\, ~ L-----~----L- --~----~---1----1----1--- Q ~ ICI I~ ~ ~I-------~----{-- --~----I-----I-----I----+--- ' V ~ = Polder Po% SSW = Sidewalk 1nv.W= 20.73 /nvN= 19.91 ------I r-----I o ~ ;~------I----•r- -T----r----T----I----~---- ~ 0 75 I C I I~~ ~I I I 15 IALCEY I I I I Q ' ~ Conc. = Concrete /nv.S= 20.68 lnvN= 19,92 Sanitary MN #3 ~ = Te/e hone Pole p = Stm MH 3 Rim- 26.90 T.P. Transformer Pad # Stm MH #8 /nu,N= 1805 ~ = Light Pole Inv, = Invert E/evatlon Rim= 26.23 Rim= 26.9s Inu.W= 18,06 LoT1o Iol LoT5 I~ W of I I I I I I I W lnvN,= 20,72 /nv.N,= 20.66 e---- = Guy Anchor Stm MH = Storm Manhole /nvE.= 20.60 Inv.sE= 20.67 Sanitary MH #4 _ _ _ _ _ J L _ _ _ _ ~ ~ I ( I COURT I SQUARE Slj'BD/~/SION 0 15 30 60 o- = Monitor Well Son. MN = Sonltar Manhole Rim= 26,52 y Stm MH #4 01 1 Inu.f = 18, 31 ALLEY ~ I I I B L to c KI 1 2 b = Traffk Slgn PVC = Polyv/nyI Ch/or/de (p/pe) Rim= 2s s5 --T__7--~---~ I,: ' Inv. W,= 20, 95 rap 26, 65 BASS OF BEARINGS.' G.l. = Crate Inlet Inv.N.= 19.97 ® = Wafer Valve Inv.S= 20.05 /nv.S= 20,04 ~o I ~ I ~ I ~ I" I ~ I o I " Bearings shown hereon are based upon the C,1. = Cirb Inlet i h I ~ I ~ I ~ I~ I h l~ l~ East right of way line of Garden Avenue ~ = Fire Hydrant EMH = Electric Monho/e Stm MH #5 c/ 2 ' = Wafer Meter Rim= 26.16 # as bear/ng N.00~813 W ® GV = Gas Valve InvS= 16.96 rap 2s.ss h ~ Ih" I~ ^ I~ ~ I Ij ° I ° I ° I ° I ° I ° I ° I ° = G L/ PM = Parkin Meter /nv.N,= Js.71 round ght 9 /nvE 1s,ss ~ o I~ o I~ o I~ o f I;, J I J I J I J 30 3o I -E-- = Buried E/ectrlc Cable BFP = Back-Aow Preventer Mag. = Magnolia I I I i I I I I I I I I , 35 35 35 35 West 55 88,7 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 -W- = Burled Water Ma1n (F) = fled Measurement -c- = Burled Gos Ma1n = pe ec d e (D) r R or D ed Ord. = C/ty Ordnance COURT STREET No. = Number DESCRIPTION DIAGRAM Note: All dimensions shown on this diagram are token from the record plats and deeds. All platted alleyways shown on this diagram +ry1~° e ° are vacated, closed and released per City of 1 Inv,- 23.22 I I ry1• - Clearwater Ordinance No, 6839-01, as recorded I +ry60y in Off/cial Records Book 11746, Page 595, Asphalt Pavement I QI - Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. > Son MN !f'1 yy 10y 1y ~ I ry0 y.,0 y1 yy 1y San MH ® . ry 4 ry Son MN® , 1 ry y. 6• y' y k k9 y~, y1 k +ry + +ry I Stm MN +ry +ry +ry +ry +ryy +ry6• +ryy +ryy' ryy' ryy' ryyy San M ® +ryb~~ iryy~" ry60° ® ® Stm MN 5 I + + + Stm MH I 1f 11(~ k1 Stm y k k y 1 s °I I Stm MN 9k 4y0y 0, 6y~ MN ~'1 gry 16~ yk 1ry y~ y~0 y~ y~y y~ry ry hey Gl, ~ t~'y b~0 sy ky 0 y, yry ryy' ryy' ry h ry h ry ~ ry 1 ~ ry ry 1 ryy' 2' ConC, Curb ryy' MN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 0 ry0~y1 hh~, ry0~y9a ry°6° 66~ 91 ' ry , y q Stm MH ~7 ryy ryy 9 ,ry ....:r. c.r. :.:.:.::::::::::Ct?+tar::.5:.:::.~::::::•:,-:.~:.::::.e::•::.:.,:::::.~:.~::.:.~:::r~•:::.:~~:G.;•i:•:i. y ry ry1• ry1• ryy`•'Dirt yy y,y1 ry6' y v:;.~::.:.v:v.:.:ecv::::,:^.. ~ yy 1 0 . h ~ o . a, ~ Stm MH Drly ry ry ~ °~~'9ii:•i?iiiY.?: d.:::J}nYe:;~,::5::;:' • 11" y y' a~ y° •:,0'onct::::, 0 :rcai;' -0''g- ®1 G G 0 y0 ry ry ry 1 •:x6i:Fci::eiF >:ii•::~~''':'~:.;;ry y. SB95939 E. y~ ~ y ~ ~ c ry ~ ~ ~ ry k °1 . ~~!'~'e;:• ~ ry°`~~ ro' • 6 ah 1 Lots 1 through 14; AND Lots 9 through 16 of Block 12, COURT SQUARE SUBDIVISION, ar ryy 1 re/e hone ~ y C + ~ ,i > + ~ ry y P ryy ry ryy '~Y.4':::~i~.;ii:^i: ii?iZ•iiii3:'i:?.• OV + ~ , N ~ G + r' ---r~-- y ^d?- `':':,~E'~'~;, 1?"rree a 165.10 ry vault 5893106 E. 47376 y~ry } ry ryy. ry°~k c c ~ ° 1 ~ c ry c according to the map or plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 52, Public Records of ryb• Railroad • , + Pinellas County, Florida. Subject to City of Clearwater Ordinance No.6839-01. yo ;`'`:~tR. N 752' N 4 SLR, ,k ,kry+ ry1 1'~~iiiii^: 0.4' ~ ~ h 6~ 12 f) 6b'` I ryyy9 Xing Arm SLR. 3::::::: b n. h - - o y 18" PgC ~ y Stm + ~y Te/e hone `..~°9 - AND 9 y 6 ry ~ y y {•:::i;:^i:` MH 3 y 1y 6gy yy ryy' ryy 0°j ryy01' MH ~4 Iryy6 I ry yyry ~:9c.r. r~ yy 'Ly ry 1 yh ry ---_"F +_-ry1, (Z } j +ry ry 18" .'Jf;•; ' o ryy . ny hyky g I I a Lots 1 through 8, Block 12, MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat h One Story N ryye~ ryo~ ry1 ryy ryy' I & ~ y?ry thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Subject PM Masonry Building I ryy, to City of Clearwater Ordinance No.6839-01. 5" Vii`,?:~: ry ~I,--_-,I Son MH ~'2 +ryy yy1 +"y y~' °ry ry1~9 AND 0.~ +9 y ry yry I v ~ 1y yy ~ ~i'~°i - ~I ~ yb +ryy +ry + Tr~e~ ~I I ry 1y 3 ~ I + y. i 75.2' T yy a I a I +ry 1'1 ry'~:;;:;:.:, ry69 ry1• A portion of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being 1 yo ::ii'•:IDh• 1 ry1 kyq e I I I 1' ry?i:i•..vy...l~r 74,9' ~ + oy ry1 ^ I N 1 Ors" ' 109 + more particularly described as follows: ryy 1~ 1°j yy~ y^9 y9k I 1 ry iii;^iiiii::•:i:'.i^iiir: ryyry iti 17 i:ii:ititiii;ii?i:•ivi:$i Q ry1' k ( ry ' ~ ryye I I . Qii, 5:i•:•iEii::firiii: ~ - _ _ _ 1 From the intersection of the North right-of-way line of Court Street and the East right-of-way line ~ q ~ a I 1 +ry - - of South Garden Aven e, run East 140 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence Northeasterly 300 feet; thence East 55 fe~t along the South right•of way line of Franklin Street; thence I Southwesterly 300 feet; thence West 55 feet along said North right-of-way line of Court Street to :?,:ua;::::•:~;~i , One Story Z '1 ~ o ~ 1 + a ~ Masonry Building ~ a p ~ ~ ° i 19" . r2"(~"„ the Point of Beginning. ip ,~~"ii?:'vii":i:~i l 9 O :tir ~ ~ ~ +ry ryy - I ~ I ~ }ryy ry1ry Q ry, 0 ~ ~ 18" f4"~ O16„ ry1,~y "~0?'rai 09 1 ' ~I ~ +ry1 C o ~ F ~ ry1~ yp1 I I I I O18" ry Q ~ y. o N I I 11 + `~~'rs.:.?: ry1• +ry1• SURVEYOR S NOTES; b :::.„::chi 10 _ I ry E ry1. yry Q o ~ _ I I I o v i:~::•:a!~!::•;;:, 1• 74.9' ~ ~ ° 01 y ~ ° ry ~ I 1. Unless otherwise noted or shown hereon, no underground foundations, ass>;..° 0 1y iiv::. W O Q N I n I 1 ~°j 28"&24„ .y1 R ryy' •ii;: 0 Q o 1 ry1 • 20" ~ +ry1. r3"p~r2" ~ ~ ~ structures, installations, utilities or any other potential underground " ~ ' encroachments have been located as a part of this survey 'C iir_•~pv~?::1~F.(", 1ryy ~ 0y y I k y :~:.W.'~?.::y+~""'..'rJ 1ry ~ 6',~ q ryy I I I 1h i ~ ry1 I aI , I 1 y + " ~ 2. This survey was prepared for the exclusive use and benefit of those 4!::•:::::. o 0 k e ~ 1 1'7 ~ y~ y 91 1~y 1^ y~ 1 ry y > W ryk 0'' ryy 9 h ry h I rowI I V 1 + 1B" o ~ Q ~ persons or entities specifically named hereon and no others. This ll'Si::~:?. w o toy ryy, dl•?t~;:;:~:;:;u o 3 1 ryy , ry +y1+y9 ~ kry yy 4 i Q31 &29" 27„ y .~~:~ra:. ~ " ry QD • I ry ~ ' • „ 1 I, 27-. a map, unless it bears the signature and original raised seal of a ry o 0 oyy ti 1,0 17 016 10 1° 18" 14 &13 14" ry1 I ry ~ y1 19" rree • U .'fk'e'e.•::•::•;i:i ~3 ryy1~ 1p y9 1y ry • + ~ ~ ry1 18 ,•,:'ai:`.:;"`?;..... +ry ry ryy -Q L_y_,_- + 15" 12° 20°~ Q • Q O78" ra" rs" Tree pis" o:~•:•:::::: Q Florida Licensed Surve or and Ma er, fs not valid and is not . • O Oars" N:?~;~:~:~ Y PP y Stm MH Q--~- ~ "1~ 76.1' ~ 0` I • „ :,:~y;:.';:: °ry ~ ~ intended to be viewed for informational purposes only. ~c ry1 Q ryyp ~ ry1~ C./, ryy i 15" 12"Mag, ~ . ye Cooler Troller ~l 0 1 , • ~ I I I 15 Vacated Alley per Ord. No. 6839-01 h:•............ 1' ~ d No. 6839-01 ry1ry "1 ~ 3. This survey is not intended to note, depict or delineate any regulatory o PM Masonry Column o- o- A4i r~ ~ I ry1. ~ rl (rypicalf ~ G3 o I ~ i - ~6 I~, body, bureau or agency jurisdiction or boundary lines, unless they are ky B ck h One Stor N ~ '4 ~ y9 1 + y. AyWa/k o y o ld N ry 1 ry ryy' Masonry Building v QO 0 ,h I I 1 + 1~ :'.sr':. ,ry `V specifically shown or noted hereon, E/ectrlc Cooler Trailer ~ C! ~ , 1y ry M':::: gaup ?i•:?i`K~`:fi. d, ~ ryy yy~ ~ a I I 1 ry1. . !v........ p y x, , I 1 Dry y~ , ::?i:;i'ii'r OT 8 0 ry !F 1~1 NI I I ~ ~ ry1p y . Telephone ~ 1 4. Attention is directed to the fact that the scale of the surve ma l/aurt .v~; ~ Y Y 9 ~ 78,1' Oy 0 ~ I ry1 4i>~~~• z have been altered during or after processing. This should be taken .~,;a;,,: " into consideration when obtainin scaled data. 4'^..... `.eve:, W 0• y 6.. I I EMH ,e;,.,~;; y ry o0 e o 1, ~ Q Top of Bank 1 g a.i.: ry o, As ho/t Pavement ry1• oa ® ® W y~ ry yry ( ~ `t Oy ry1. +ry . I :~iQ;::•:•''w:"•: 1. P y fMH ,y1' San MH ry > 7° 1• ~4 'F 1. :iiri;;,:;~tv:'6~•:i;:{;: ry 1~' d by ~y ~ ry "-h---"----' ::::•6<i'$:.::•..;., C,/. ~ Stm MN y,~+ ryy, ry1. ( Z I ,vy ,+1'-------------- 1• ~ Stm MN ryy. ry ~ ry clean-aura ry1 5. Elevations shown hereon refer to NGVD-29 Datum. o::;:•:::i~; E-'~ 0 0 0 .,,090.... , ryy I F I ro17 \d~ 1ky 1o C1 0 ~y 15 Vacated Alley per Ord. No. 6839 1 ° m \'OLO >F" s'O' Q'?~~~~'~~~ ~ 6 1 Reference Benchmark: Pinellas County Benchmark "HARRIS L", rsr.2 c°S ? "6 "1 " Published Elevation = 28,005 feet. ry ry1 + ~ ~ ( I ~~ii i \ I ,P yk s9 + try + Aspha/f Pavement ~ I I j J Meter °y :if~r:ii ' i ryy ry ry1 y9y c° I I ,y.: , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3Cv 71 ~ • 3~ l ~l s",~~i:aiii?cr::•iiii: try i,:•}•,~F•'{;,:i.; 6 :;:;:y9?:?,"::.c:,r:., 11' 0 6. This parcel contains 190,391 square feet or 4,37 acres, more or less. i, ry ~ I i We/r Structure - o I ,•,.1 Skimmer = 28,97 1 ry1.j 9 ° I Grate = 28.48 I ro I I Weir = 24,01 ~ r.:(1 I N ry .1r" 0 ry W ~ ry1~ I Iv:•i:1p' I y~ h rW0 $ti 1 ;h 0 h ry 11 7. This surve was re ared without the benefit of a current title search. Two Stary Masonry Building ~ e Y P P O, ?i'~'~ ry~09 hry1~ rii? 1 30" PVC +ry ok k ~ - - - DETENTION POND i " ~~~~'"'~~~""~'"'~`"~1'"""~~''`~`~~`~•'`' No instruments of record were furnished to the undersi ned. • B ~1ry 1~1 Iry1' ;•ii' 1ry1~ i ~ 0 ryy ~ y ~[7. 1 Mitered End Section 1 00 I :::'1 Inv.= 21.06 i ° „~2 9 y. Q ry i y a ~ ~ 1 2~~• -2 A~ I ~ ~z a~ ? 8, WilsonMiller, Inc. accepts no responsibility for the identification of the r~.a,~ ~z~' -wt' ry1^ tree species shown hereon. Every effort has been made to properly 1~ ~ ryry1• I 1 ~ ~ ~:,;ii 6° 'k $ ryy' ~ ry ie+ 1 1 158' , _ ~ / 14 ri.:::.:;;;; h ' identify trees shown hereon, however tree identification is outside of d ryyy +ry yyk y1ry9 ry6~o y ry i i ryk oo° ~ 65,8' 1.:i:::• + h 1 ry 1 F.i:1 y 11• N s5•s' ~-~"-1-`--- j T-;~` ris' " +ry the area of ex ertise of a Professional Surve or and Ma er. -The tree y1 ryy a6:. ry i:. ry1' f ? ~ ~ I' q types shown are for informational purposes only and should only be TP ~ rzo'o 40•x' 'o N 13's e used after confirmation by a Certified Arborist or other such professional. I cfl 19, y9 ry yh ryy. I T,P. ~ 15'h!o t ~ 4, 4, 55'(D) ry bh9 Mry' ; N BfP 8 v.. 19.2' 9.5' y O , ry 1~ I ry1,~~ 1 py 11;•yk 0 .IM. .'W ~ ryy' ~ y °j 140, 88' F 140 0 N l2 0 rot' 60.19 y yo ay o`, 1P yy ry1 Top of Bonk yy 1• .-pry ~ ~1° ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 SIR, ~ O k y :r:,. 1' ry 1' 1' 1' 1' ry " • b ry 12,3 •r 1 6 US ° 1 h 1~ ~ F.LP. ~'~;:•:iiii:•:yh ry ry y O . ry 'N::: ......,:.e:~:c;:::ce::::::ae:•c::ae:::.e:.:::e::::::::a::^:c::.::.:v:::::.e;:.:::ar.::e::.ec:::,ee:.e:::::a::..::.e.:.:....e.::ae::.e::::c:e::.v..•::.c~: A y t................,..,.......,....,..... •:::::.C nc.^:5 . s::::::x:::::::::::::::c:;:::::;::::::a:s::::;:::;::::cc^:::::::::::::c:::::::::::::::::. y 0 W .~w..wr+n,nMw..+vnK.aww..wwn.•~v,.w~.,w,w..w~w..wnw.. .~ww..wHw.eww..w,~. ..ww..ww:. ~•Lh7.•~T.•~~::. , r:::c:::::: v.~~~~~:::e:v:::•::::v:::::::::::::.::::::....................~................................................................................................. ......c:::r.::.e: :•.e:::::e•.::::.:: :e ..e:::::::;::;:::::::::::r: ::::::::::::::::r.~:::i::ii::::ail::::r::::::rri::r::::cair. :::^:::::::::::•h•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:•:•`CP: •:,.:r:r::.&`C/i.C•:::5`./~::::::x:::::: ~j::::::::::c:::::::::c::::c:s: aa:::::;f..:::ac:::::::::::.~~„i~.,, l:iiiiii•:::•i:?•::i•::•::•::•: •:::•:i:::i^:iii;{~i:::•::ii•::I:~:•::•ii:L•::•:::•:::ii•:ri ::.......................1................................,.................................(o................. :•i:•:i•::•:... - 1 h:.............. . .......*d•::::...........,.....,...........,............ ~ ^7 0 ......r~....... o orkrn Met r ~ , tr:.~:::.~.:•:::::.:~:::::•:::::::,~,~:::::::::::::.:.~:::::• y k y y yy y ry P g e . h ry ry San MH y 1~ ~y4 y 6 y 1 1 1 1 y' ~ , 6y...,,+. ryy. 6• ry ~ ry .;:::::::•~'0%I~i:•a)fFl'~:?::~:i:::. ryy. ry ry ry On OnC. 0 BFP ~ 1~ eFP 1p1 o r~ ~ ° PREPARED FOR; C of S Religious Trust y C.l. y ~ C C ...GE G G - 11" (Typlco/ 10" +ryy' y G y G ry G ® n W ky fir::,: y W 0°-- W -Q rok- W W - y~ e.: ryy6yoo A® ryy^ o ~ yp ry y0 yy v::.,'•ii::?:r::.;•i::. ryy' ryy h,.;i,isi^:•iiii^:•ii:5;i:iii:?ir:~iii:iv::i:•i:•i,; ry y. y. y 4 h N ~ ry y y ry - ry ryy .:.;•::,::::::G`A70..; lk'/.Vd.:::•:::::, . y V' ry6•,y k ry 1 k 1~„ 1 ay y> ?'C/. ,y ry1 ryy 2' Conti Curb 1y ryy~a° ary ryy' y k C.l. o , ry y y y , y a• y y y ~S ryy' ryy ryy Parking ryy' y1• Parking ry ry ~ h o ry ry Parking ryy' y~ ry ry 9ry 1099 ~ ry' 6• ~ This survey is not valid wit ~ h~j' sft,~pture and original ryy' ryh ryh' Parking ryh• ryb• h ~ ~ ?1.', ____---i 9r y raised seal of a Florid ~ '•surv~~~,r'~~nd mapper. O ryy ryy. C1 gk~ oy yy_--_p' ~ yy ---6 yry-i ~I ~yl-------yr---I~ 61•---- h6~6 '4°b"~y °0 `46y9 ry°bry~ ry66 3 ~ L'. 4~~g8~N'~~~ ryb ryy ryy ryy^ ryy ryy y1 ry ryy ryy ryy ~ ryy ryb ky ryy ~ Ui ryy?` ryy' ryyal ryy1~ ryyy1 ryy ryy ryyy ry6ry {ryy i 66 ryh. 0° N ~'hr 7~'r ~ ryyyy ~ I- Lone Une 1 " ~ ' ~ ~ ORIGINAL WIL~~N1LLEf~~I, ~ ~ m , ~ 1 ~ 9 ry 9 RECEIVED = - ' ~ + +ryyy ryy~1 San MN ® yyy ryy?1 San MH ® ryyyb ryy^y ryy0" ryyry Son MH ® ryy ~ yry Lone 1lne ryy'?y ry ,I ?~QS fiL RI ~ • V F it l~tp~ PIANNING UEfAi~'~4~1E4~ E O ~Y ~~~a' r~.M ' ~ Asphalt Povament I j CIIYOF CLEAP~I~,~~e~i~ orid ' Surveyor~a, ;zivlapper No, 6399 W i REV#1 REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION 5/9/06 J,G,C, ACTIVITY INITIALS EMP. NO. DATE ¦ . ¦ Wa "auaaacooo0 > - - w~Ybr,M CwMateof Autl bronM CLIENT: DATE: TITLE: REV# REVISION DATE INIT./EMP# PARTY CHIEF: D.F. PC/NO DATE I J DATE INIT,/EMP# DRAWN BY' J G,C DRWN/NO DATE REV# REVISION C_OF_S_RELIGIOUS_TRUST HORIONA SCAALE: BOUNDARY-TOPOGRAPHIC REV# REVISION DATE INIT,/EMP# CHECKED BY: S.E.S. DESGN/NO DATE Planners•Engtneers - Ecologfats - Surveyors - LandscapeArchBects•TransportaNonConautltants W VERTICAL SCALE: AND-TREE-LOCATION-SURVEY INDEX NUMBER: AL fe PROJECT: CD REV# REVISION DATE INIT,/EMP# F.B. PINELLAS, PG.7 FBOOK/PGS DATE WiISonMiller, Inc. i SEC: TWP: RGE: CROSS REFERENCE FILE NO.. PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER: Noes -Fort Myere•Sarasota-Bradenton-Tampa •Tdahassee 0 REV No. REVISION DATE DRAWN BY /EMP. No. CHECKED BY /EMP, NO. WM APPROVED BY: MCham-WadeDrive, Sulte400N-Tampa,Rorda33602-Phone. M223-9500•Pax 0-223-0009•Web-&e;www**onndercom CHURCH-OF-SCIENTOLOGY NSA NSA sonmbrcom i 16 29 15 CROSS 05573 1 OF 1 - 5ECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST - PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA a~ 1 1 1 - 30 0 15 30 60 1 ~ PLATTED NOT 1" = 30' ~ GRAPHIC SCALE 1 ~ 1 a x °A ~ 1 ~ gyp' 1' CONC, .5a x x y 1 ~°1 x x,I ~9 61 ~9 p9 ~9 y9 1 RETAINING 0• 0 5 0• ~0' ti WALlS x~' ,y0~ CURB INLET k00 x~ X ~ti' ;~oti x THROAT ELEV. = 29.94 GRATE IIJLEi x 0 STORM INLET k1 5" CONC. RETAINING WALL n TOP ELEV. = 3D.87 CRATE ELEV, = 30.62 8 0' ( 1 k k STORM INLET M' TOP EL V. = 7.07 `L ~ E, INV. ELEV. _ 24.17 E. INV. ELEV. = 25.D2 •D `P/ 6.00 P ,p 1 ~ i P x° E ~ 59'15 30 E (P) W, INV. ELEV. = 24.02 w INV. ELEV.. = 24.92 ~ 0 0 ELEV. = 6.09 E. INV. ELEV. 22.82 q ~ n 595.93 (M) 9• INV. ELEV. = 3.24 W. INV ELEV. = 21.72 k 5 .59'14 58; W M S INV, ELEV. = 28.32 , 5.93' (M) k ~ p t3 „ 9" ~ti• 18 13~, 19 15 ? 18 18 0 11 X t 2 19.9 0~. 11 ~ 7 1 „ 10 9„ 16, 15" 28" ~"SCI,`' ~ ti9~9 7,9~`~ k ,17., LF 1 „ 31.0 1g" LP i~-t3.. 31.2 16.,L JS°COLUMN"'~ p1 29~~ 13 8" 1" 8" 11., LP ~ 19 . X16° 20'~ X' 10" ' lF ~ g2~ 1T LP (ILLEGIBLE). ~ I aoB n" LP J2q 3 19 J~ wv ;.28,98 k 1 11" tig 1 ~~0 - _ J° J, 15"/16" J~ 6 ~ ° 'JJ J TWIIJ 'sj ' 15` R.C.P ~ x X12' ~ I ~ - ~ -~S 24" ~ 0 ~ ?s~ ~s n 6" CONC. CURB: - 1 0~ - - R.C.P _ = RC.P N ~ vy _ _ _ ti 2a. _ 6" CONC. CURB N ~ 9a ry90 k 9 r~~ _ - -;~I----~ _ g16 .6 11 -X_- BOLLARDS STORM INLET I ~ \ ~24" 12" ~/1 15" 1 ~0 M : N SHUFFLEBOARD COURT „ 1 S'^' _ }H0 (iYF) GRATE ItJLET GRATE ELEV. = 30.30 h`O (FILLED WITH DIRT) 1 4` T 1 x ti~0` - - TOP ELEV. = 6.65 ` -'(r X12" ~4" 28S 8" P.V.C. - - _ S. INV. ELEV. = 25.80 ti~ - p'S g6ti , W, ItJV, ELEV, = 25.70 ~ ry9' kti 0 141,1 ?11^ / „ 1 " 20.8' II (ROOF ,5ti> 24" Rip 0 ;yr A ~ 36 10 GTRAPE 11 6' CONC. CURB II DRAIN?) k PLA y ~ - - 4,~ , a. h 10 13" ~4" 16" ) b 12.0' k 8' o ~yo I I I I 14 .I ~ CJ . / ,y0• ~ "1; 10" N N COV ~ I ~"~~S„~ g„ 8 of u 312 ~ ~ N ASPH X x I I f '.o' 1 ~ la 14~ 10 7.. ~ 16.0 ~ 9. z I 115.8' 3 I I y°9 j j : x~p PSG '7p6 29 4S ::;:S~bi' rye, k 291h y v ~ ~ Q X ? .,ry ti ~ sw j ~ 55 ~ ~y9ti 9° L~ Q . RADIUS = 980.00 ~ X to / r ~ cov. II ~ I E~ FL CB N" I CONC. I I ARC = 134.40 P I.~ ,s~ 9~ ~1d" ~•,4° o1z'/z a o ~ ~ I I o ~0 ~ I o 0 2.7 j FLAG I I II P~ ~ 29.43 10. L('j _ \ ~N x M uj o II Q~ m ti ~ M ~ CHORD = 134.29 P 134.24 /M I I # 14 ~ ,n° ~Q Po E I I l~ I 0 a h a' L ~ n o I I~ 8" ~ ` ~ 9, 5' p dI ro o, LP II LP~ i i P~ LF~ LP~ BFP ?g WV, ~9b63 x~°p ~ ~ 3 BEARING = N 10'1137 W (P) Imo, 1a h ~ „ 6s'/o I ~ ~J a II . ~,f. , FIRE v ~ I I a UCWP I I ~ STANDPIPE y ~ ~ N 10'13'56" W M IW ~ ~ 14 ,3' ~4Q l ~ y ° 1. Ix 1..`i 1~'/ 6„? ~ I~ M~ I 13 $r 96,0' k5 J III n I I 7p I / rn o ORY BUILDING o I I I 'ro, 23' • " ~11 1 " 12 I~ - u. I FLOOR II' I I ~ I ~1a 3''~ „ ~4 t2.o' ELEV.~33.25 ,ye II I I ~ OCV ry29.67 x R 1 20 to 9 II ti I nj0 I I ^ 00 1 27~" ~ , ' 990 °.V1 'r; ~ ~,.i Q - _ . < I ~ 13 `rl ,e ~14" X11•, ~o 126,0' ~ ,,~g,. x~ II 6 /6l7 I ~ti• a _ / 1~ JI 2.0 N I t..,,, I 0. ITw1N ~ / s y I I x x X019 0 ? °,9 P~' J" ~ ^4 `"J x 15~~ 1 ' 1 '"h' , . , 33.9' 7 6 8' 10 ~ 15" ~ 2 ~ a H I 188.7 ~ 1, Z,: ,5°1 X'~p s O ~ 0. 0 b 4' HIG \ 1L ~ 14. tit / 11~. h 1 STORY m CONC, WALL I ;H GRATE INLET p= 3p 0q + ~ ,WALL GRATE ELEV. = 30.84 CONC. y P INV. ELEV. = 2fi.34 COLUMN 3p ~ ~y0ry ~y°6 ~ 1 ~ ~ J10` GAZEBO ti 33.9' ~99 ~ 3" I ?K (GOV. BRICK 'T~ o e e • , (TYP.) UCWP x 8, T 11' • , 'IF „ 1 x 12 14" 15" p 16 PAVERS) . ; 7, < ; ' 3 k II\\^^ 128.7 a 6°/JZ"/22" 1z"/22° IG"/1a" ~r- yh °0° ~ ~ 24' 1 T I ~ 1 37~ W ~4' Gv ' A/C 6„/1 O . „ I ~ 13" 13~ 12 ~ =~'I 31° N k'S,' 15' 6., >`ia WV FUEL TANK ti' rn 1110" 12" TRIPI 20 I~ 5„ 6" ~2„ 11„ I i N ~ „ 4,. „ , :Q 15' 1p" TRIPLE TN~N ? TWIN ~y°' y~ 30 46 / J 1 N 3 / /9 u 7 „ ON CONC. ~ 9, 9' TR 'io, „ 16 LP TWIN h ~ ! ~ N 17 25 ^ SHED ? 3 /5 26 . LP 60 ~ ~ J 13' /14" LP ~ ~ ~ SIGN h 16' LP [[J~ LP~ TWIN ~ 4" 16 19 p`~ pA ~ ~ ~ 5" , tiff J° , . 1 J~ o TRIPLE 23„ "J Y2„ ~ ~3„ 5„ UCwP TWIN ?e , 6 8 ® 15" 5 ~ ~ ~ a0 2 PP ;~4 0 0 ~ ® ~ - - - ® t5,. 5., ~ y, T ~ - - 30.57 k h~ ~ 20' 1 - - - - - - - - -tt i MASONRY WALL `L' J~ J~~ ~m I 'S' ,ti .m o ~1 1h i h ` - - ~ o`' ' ~ ~ 572. 0' P 572,15' M ° I / 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE S 89 34 00 W /P & M) N 2 O 13 N ~ \ - i ~ 30 2p X _ N ~ RETENTION POND ~ F.LP. 1 1/2" 5 ti FOUrlD "X" 1~,, H 573 2.26' S_, ~1 1 `'dy ti CUT ON CONC..y~`~m 1ti`' COLUMN x V 0.29' E.) ~ 10 ~ I ~ ~ TOP OF BANK. 10. ti~ ~Oh ~,9 ~ ~ JQB x~ 6 I ;,0' / X 'Sp x k x ti6 ~ v ~ x x •5 d X gG' , x ' ~ NOT PLATTED • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: • OAK COVE A COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM, according to the plat thereof ' , as recorded in Condominium Plat nook 102, Pages 92 through 95, of I ' the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. I , ORIGINAL ~ ~ ~ - RECEIVED I • I - APR 2 71006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1.) ALL CORNERS FOUND HAVE NO NUMBER DESIGNATING PREVIOUS SURVEYOR OR COMPANY EXCEPT AS SHOWN. 2) ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE MEASURED PER PLAT AND/OR DEED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. . SYMBOL 3.) NO UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS, FOUNDATIONS OR UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED OR SHOWN UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SYMBOL LEGEND 4) NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR OWNERSHIP WERE FURNISHED THIS SURVEYOR ' EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON. DENOTES AN EXISTIP 5.) ELEVATION DATUM; N.G,V.D. 1929, M.SL =-0.00, BENCHMARK: U.S.C.& G.S. "TBM N0 2 1949", ELEV. = 3.821 OTES AN EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION BASIS OF BEARINGS' S PLAT BOUNDARY BEINGS 89'34'00" W (PER PLAT), x 6.) THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE CONSULTED THE FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP, t0 DEPJOTES AN OAK T OTES AN OAK TREE -SIZE INDICATED COMMUNITY No. 125096, PANEL No. 0015 D, EFFECTIVE DATE 8/19/91, AND THE .HEREON DESCRIBED PARCEL APPEARS TO BE IN ZONE X. ' ,~1o DEhJOTES A PALM TI 7.) IN THE EVENT THAT A FENCE WILL BE ERECTED BASED ON THIS SURVEY, MONUMENTATION MUST BE USED, OTES A PALM TREE -SIZE INDICATED !NOT BUILDING LOCATION REFERENCE DIMENSIONS. ' t31D DENOTES AM EVERG 8,b THE SURVEY DEPICTED HERE IS NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE. OTES AM EVERGREEN TREE -SIZE INDICATED 9. UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND h1APPER; 6 DENOTE A FCNA E ® S C i THIS DRAWING, SKETCH, PLAT OR MAP 15 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT VALID. OTES A CFhNA BERRY TREE -SIZE INDICATED 6„ ' 0 DENOTES A KUMOU/ Q 6„ OTES A KUMQUAT TREE -SIZE INOIr,ATED A86REVIATION LEGEND. OVERBECK & ELLIOTT, INC. F.I,R FOUND IRON ROD, SIZE INDICATED SEC. SECTION PRQFES510NAL SURVEYORS DENOTES A HOLLY OTES A HOLLY TREE -SIZE INDICATED S.LR. 5ET IRON ROD, i/2" P,S.M,i~3983 TWP, TOWNSHIP 3089 Roosevelt 81vd„ Cleorwater, Florida 33760 ?6 DENOTES A CAMPH( F.I,P. FOUND IRON PIPE, SIZE IND~CATED RGE. RANGE Phone (727) 524-9666 FAX (727) 524-9328 OTES A CAMPHOR TREE - SIZE INDICATED F.N,D. FOUND NAIL AND DISK (D) DEED Certificate of Authorization L.B. ~ 6913 S.N.D. SET NAIL AND DISK, P.S.M:I#3983 (P) PLAT 136 DENOTES A CHERRY OTES A CHERRY TREE -SIZE INDICATED F.C.M. FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (M) MEASURED CERTIFIED T>J: JOB NUMBER P, R.M. PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT (C) CALCULATED NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC, n 6„ ® DENOTES A CEDAR OTES A CEDAR TREE -SIZE INDICATED P,C.P. PERMANENT CONTROL PDIN~ CONC, CONCRETE 201 P.I. POINT OF INTERSECTION COV. COVERED CB CABLE BOX I ASPH, ASPHALT A TREE LABELED "TWIN' LABELED "TWIN" IS 2 TRUNKS f,4EASURED WLR WATER LINE RISER PVMT.. PAVEMENT 21 V S. ~SCE~LA AVENUE 4' ABOVE THE GROUND ' "TRIPLE~~ IS 3 TRUNKS I 'E THE GROUND FROM i MAIN TRUNI(, R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY ELEV. ELEVATION IS 3 TRUNKS MEASURED ABOVE THE TYP. TYPICAL FL FLOOD LIGHT UHUUNU I-HUM 1 MAIN rKUM 1 MAIN [HUNK UHW OVLHHLAD wKL LP LIGHT POLE CERTIFIED AS A BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ULP UTILITY/LIGHT POLE WV WATER VALVE I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS SURVEY MEETS THE fl'NIN 00 ~ECNNICAI1.0 r, HYD FIRE HYDRANT ARDS AS SET FORTH BY GV GAS VALVE THE FLORIDA BOARD, OF PROFESSIONAL R5,AND f AP,PEf~S IN CHAPTER 61G17-6 TR TRANSFORMER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PUR A QIC 47Q$7 I,,LORIDA STATUTES. BFP BACK FLOW PREVENTER PP POWER POLE ~1 , DCV DOUBLE CHECK VALVE SCALE: lN_30, REVISED UCWP UNDERGROUND CABLE WARNING POST DATE. " i^- -~y3 i 7/9/02 ED ARD C^ L .TT 1-~~~