The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2006-05033`Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ZIDO 0 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: .?? .. 7006 _\y * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ir A Nr> AP-6 FLEXIBLE S APPLICATION Residential Infill Project (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPLICANT NAME: & O Se_ MAILING ADDRESS: O l? V? Y r rv PHONE NUMBER: FfYEL?PJUMBER: 7a7 ,v o._.y?..QQ PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: y?y?? 4"E PHONE NUMBER: cl FAX NU: CELL NUMBER rJ,? +7 (? ?'37Q 8 E MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: PROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): D ! PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: r'7 •Q I 3S .J . -1 11Lw 1 _w .. 9I PROPOSED USE(S): A%% -A.* 1 v vr.M UW. 1 Q ca.... gr ?T..t 1 - DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 1, At I - . -- !t Page I of 8 Section 4-202.A) d (Q v I • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PR SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. R'1'y_13 5???DVI-?R.A 'g.?,?i1M??R?..._??t?iuJT'?A4.._?2y?s _...tr?tTf4 ?.5?' •516_Tt,?,G?,S _?_?a_??Ss.?.........Itf,...,.,.....M.??!MS?._..__._....Cs?V..p??6 ?d 1? 'g??lyt?6.?_?_t?.-???loS ??D?C ??b 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 6in _U`it??wL_._......?G!T!??P_5 --Ili o°? i5__y?.??? 3. Th proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 1'a ?k-00 E gEQv 19-IL s IF* V- Y1'S A'"1 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. A;OE A?1G?Zh J?'L A0 14m?rayUE ?vEyAy t? peogoSE? *-Afsa I 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. 2006 Page 2 of 8 E 0 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ? Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. CiFJ.Yl10T lop (Tl+ e? Pa EdF/l.« s - 0fE ^ L 7 ? 1Sv/? A1Dt ? o rCE`L4ga?lr LA , p . St'T k y t R t?FTZ A 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting 3 properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) R ?1r?..? GAS ht as u1t? p?/ `mss 'fNE v i. ?1 .! ?bs twp f?ND T" ar+\ yt'CC.?9??u? eo«hT,tw`t?m.v'?tAs, i i4N? 1?+9D?-rs?.+ nr Q ?f?1_ 9??wacc 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. i2rL Fzz Td tTA+?%. S. r>*j t4C.T 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. _-- •? 5?r_"1"41r? \b o, 5"a ? ?Frw.t?s?, ?' S?Orr?A_??? #?tt.l? ?? !D?,,?c,_L_r atc,T,a? t ?z, . S wt1 to t w.,. pealt, r VC=VI). $e__ lu F- D Ib Utl O !? 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. ........._fc...z....._......_Z+.rK ._S._.o.?....__...A_rc,Z......._o._.....7.N_ts............A?p,ca?,_a.................................... ? J ?9o t..? S D Rf b•?i.1aTa4 {,_,?tMbTk.rCTww! J9??1 1`• (sm L 'M tZi?rF_....._..._?.?f_.......ul.??•'??_ f......_.....dG_7_???ts.._.._2iVtt..w4._L..._,..`+.4_lvr??wc..........._'_...._r_?t..__?l7tRR_.?....._`r.4pLet o 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a w hole. E5 _ E M T6 !? _ J? 1R $o v 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Rf1o sXp?7't+? •-'r cJttfA App, T sxTRAcI 6 ?S?T Aa: ?.IG?ip.?? F ?i 'r' - _?F ?? ? E dK.viN7N? ? ????i'ts wG6 ATTUAt b koT ,. Nt:? ft 4o ) (fy- - 1,6-44- Appzw V- `M I6o 5, 7 - So.-r 1:s" k ;p _ Sy . 7TacsT 16 Pb#,%tt.w ?.p rT N•dT ?A it K+'&3 UOP-tt. JTRX[.T - ;fie. 217 w?VE &j%LPAK Le- 0R.XA OF 51, ' LoT .S-*ZA 4e,NAdO3-BE 1CVC49=J0 -./ Vir4O vT F(&i a? I..Ty y £x , f:1 ?yTo1C r? nJ K.oy N o?t..Mbro 5 +v v??r.ri?A.vD u4 1-t V% VIC (U-40"ILk w..g jol.1c N T'r C. VA?L v R I_ v A, rz 1 #--7 14e.-r Qf4v#,e--rd 7R Page 3 of 8 0 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures, ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor tAK-1V elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) Ly SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? TREE INVENTORY; prepares by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ?Afp LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; AUL 17 2006 Page 4 of 8 • • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)@ and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: / .......? Land area in square feet and acres; . EXISTING REQUIRED .......... ................. _................. ..._.... PROPOS ./ ...?...?.......?...f Q'!r!? f Number of EXISTING dwelling units; IN 13tA Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Z f f Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, .expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; 1? 5 Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; k Building and structure heights; T f ,/Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and .'7 • 65 . bs ?Fooor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ??` fl _ ?? 1J [4 K REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'%X 11); O ? DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ro Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Page 5 of 8 0 • H. LA DS APING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ??0 ?P ? LANDS APE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. A REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; k REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNP :.(Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXIS NG freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. JUL 1. 7 MIS Page 6 of 8 0 0 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Ll Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ? Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Sig ature of pro rty owner or represent five STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEL Sworn o and subscribed before me this day of ?L/ to A.D. 20 to me and/or by /te i -fy, .1 . C11r tek! , who i ersonally n has .?..? J..--J 7- My JUL e 7of8 Mar Settle ou sion # DD393367 F Expires February 6, 2009 ftWWTroyFde.lmwwwft 000,1867011 C N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ?nIAN14E JSAV 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) _ -gv-Qu(-E ivr 8oks s' ^ 6L,` as'- ro` ,?? Y 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: N?R?.w ?iavL ? l as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (11w) and i ned aut , hereby that the foregoing is true and correct. roperty Owner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared x{ j {';l J . ? ?L_. __ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. otary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Ex i s: F-cib. ce Zo b 040''1 & Mary Settle Vi : Commission # DD393367 JUL i 7 2WO ' ?F Expires Febmary 6,2W9 OF atB=W Trey Fdn - hmrmft Ina 0ON65.7019 Page 8 of 8 July 14, 2006 TO: John schodtler City of Clearwater Planning Dept. RE: 727 Bay Esplanade FLS2006-05033 Mr. Schodtler, We are requesting an addition to the variance based on our conversations and e- mails regarding the height requirements of the roof top structure. We would like to ask that the maximum allowable height be increase from 30' above BFE to 33'-6" above BFE for the following reasons: The rooftop structure acts as an access for the maintenance of the condensing units and elevator equipment if need be. Minimum height requirements for the ceiling in this area is dictated by the F.B.C. 2004, which would not allow us to lower the structure any further. We would like to put a roof on this structure that is pleasing to the neighborhood and in keeping with the design. This roof would make the max. height of the building at 33'-6". This portion of the building that will be above 30' is a very minimal amount not the entire structure and we believe that this request is not an unreasonable one seeing as the overall structure and building will certainly benefit the neighborhood in a positive way. I would like to thank you again for working on this issue with us and I look forward to working together on future projects that will enhance the neighborhoods of the City of Clearwater. Highest Regar Chris Kuckert Project Manager Metro Architects INCOMPLETE LETTER 06 / 24 /oca COMPLETE LETTER O to / D 6 /0 6 MAPS DRC DATE STAFF REPORT AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA O / a.S /00 t VIA NA CDB DATE / NA / DEVELOPMENT ORDER K'07113-64 JUL 'i`' 0 46 FLS2006-05033 727 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 05/26/2006 GLOECKL, KEITH ZONING DISTRICT: LMDR LAND USE: RU ATLAS PAGE: 249A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet I 1 Qn -,ATE > 0?? Lon; RANGE PIANNING Dr•.vla.oPMEN'r R.-vii.W July 17, 2006 Mr. Andrew Paul 314 South Missouri Avenue Suite 311 Clearwater, FL 33756 • 3 C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMI3NT Pos, Ori:ia: Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FromDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Sourii Mrlrri.r Avr:x(a:, Cu--.Amvxri iI , FLoml)A 33756 TELFINIONE (727) 562-4567 Fnx (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-05033 at 727 Bay Esplanade. Dear Mr. Paul: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 29, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a new detached dwelling unit in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district including: A front (north) setback reduction to building from 25 feet to five feet, a front (west) setback reduction to pavement from 25 feet to 10 feet, a rear, waterfront setback reduction to pool deck at existing grade from 10 feet to zero feet, an increase to the maximum building height to the stairwell and elevator equipment from 30 feet to 33.5 feet, and to allow a six foot tall aluminum fence in a front setback along the unimproved Aster Place right of way, as a Residential Infill Project, per section 2-203.C. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.141 acre subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 3. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as per Section 2-203.C of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; 2. The final layout of the site be consistent with the conceptual site plans submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; FRANK I111MAIM. NIM(W J(m? DOIAK, Dm m.ii_wtmm 1, 11())-r I I:UnLrOX, 0A NCHAIDMIT lin.i. ?(muI , C r: (ai. ir:>n;rr, ® Caw I:x A. Pl I :l Sl::x, 01( Ncium:?I1P.1i Page 2 July 17, 2006 FLS2006-05033 3. Any future additions to the property be reviewed for compliance with the Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) of 0.65; 4. In the event construction of the top floor roof deck elevator is not provided, the tower shall comply with the maximum building height of 30 feet; 5. Provide a survey showing existing grades (spot elevations) on the subject site prior to the issuance of any building permit. Spot elevations should be in a grid format spaced every ten to twenty feet; 6. The pool deck shall not exceed 12 inches above existing grade; 7. No part of the structure(s) and/or landscaping shall be constructed within the right-of-way of Aster Place; 8. Parked vehicles shall not block City sidewalks per City Ordinance Section 30.041(1)(b); 9. A three foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the outside of the six foot tall fence along the reduced front setback from the Aster Place; 10. Show the trees on the site plan prior to the issuance of any building permits; 11. Any improvements, such as adjacent lot grading, that impact the city street end north of this lot are to be reviewed by the City Engineer and approved by means of a city right-of-way permit. Private landscaping of the street end by the adjacent owner is strongly discouraged. This is because that in a stormwater event the street end can allow stormwater to runoff when the city storm pipe system is overloaded; and 12. All mechanical and pool equipment be screened from the public right-of-ways and adjacent properties per section 3-903.H.1. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above twelve conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plans dated received July 03, 2006, the revised application dated received July 17, 2006, and the revised building elevations dated received July 17, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (July 17, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodtler, Planner H at (727) 5624547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, .ter Michael Dellk, AICP Planning Director SAPlanning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FLS)\Inactive or Finished Cases\Bay Esplanade 727 - Goeckl (LMDR) ]VS\FLS2006-05033 Development Order.doc 0 8 '? 1 .r ? LONG RANGE PIANNING D.v]-TOPME.N-r Rivlt:w July 17, 2006 Mr. Andrew Paul 314 South Missouri Avenue Suite 311 Clearwater, FL 33756 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos'r O{=rice Box 4748, CLEARWATER, Fi.omDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SrRVICI:S BUILDING, 100 SOUTII MvRTU: Avl:N(;ii, C1YA1mA•1'1:R, RotcIDA 33756 I'Ia.IiPl IoNI: (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-05033 at 727 Bay Esplanade. Dear Mr. Paul: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 29, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a new detached dwelling unit in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district including: A front (north) setback reduction to building from 25 feet to five feet, a front (west) setback reduction to pavement from 25 feet to 10 feet, a rear, waterfront setback reduction to pool deck at existing grade from 10 feet to zero feet, an increase to the maximum building height to the stairwell and elevator equipment from 30 feet to 33.5 feet, and to allow a six foot tall aluminum fence in a front setback along the unimproved Aster Place right of way, as a Residential Infill Project, per section 2-203.C. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.141 acre subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 3. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as per Section 2-203.C of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; 2. The final layout of the site be consistent with the conceptual site plans submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; FRANK I I IM \1M, NIA) (M' iii INN '\, DA u.I1.ur:?IIgu; I Im-r I I:? ni:rc ?. C i ac:11AW I" r, (:nI xcu.wt ncrr. ® (::VBP.\ A. I'r11[161(X, Ccn AXE \rrn;al:?ri? :.i\C11ON Page 2 . July 17, 2006 FLS2006-05033 3. Any future additions to the property be reviewed for compliance with the Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) of 0.65; 4. In the event construction of the top floor roof deck elevator is not provided, the tower shall comply with the maximum building height of 30 feet; 5. Provide a survey showing existing grades (spot elevations) on the subject site prior to the issuance of any building permit. Spot elevations should be in a grid format spaced every ten to twenty feet; 6. The pool deck shall not exceed 12 inches above existing grade; 7. No part of the structure(s) and/or landscaping shall be constructed within the right-of-way of Aster Place; 8. Parked vehicles shall not block City sidewalks per City Ordinance Section 30.041(1)(b); 9. A three foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the outside of the six foot tall fence along the reduced front setback from the Aster Place; 10. Show the trees on the site plan prior to the issuance of any building permits; 11. Any improvements, such as adjacent lot grading, that impact the city street end north of this lot are to be reviewed by the City Engineer and approved by means of a city right-of-way permit. Private landscaping of the street end by the adjacent owner is strongly discouraged. This is because that in a stormwater event the street end can allow stormwater to runoff when the city storm pipe system is overloaded; and 12. All mechanical and pool equipment be screened from the public right-of-ways and adjacent properties per section 3-903.H.1. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above twelve conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plans dated received July 03, 2006, the revised application dated received July 17, 2006, and the revised building elevations dated received July 17, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (July 17, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodtler, Planner II at (727) 5624547 or via e-mail at john..schodtler@myclearwater.corn. Sincerely, r? Michael Dellk, AICP Planning Director SAPlanning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FLS)\Inactive or Finished Cases\Bay Esplanade 727 - Goeckl (LMDR) JVS\FLS2006-05033 Development Order.doc C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OrrICR Box 4748, CLFARWATIT, FI.mjDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, S@RVICE.S BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR"I'u, AVI?NUE, CLRARWATE.R, FLORIDA 33756 TI?1,EPH0NR (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVYLOPMI?N'r IZI:VIRW July 17, 2006 Mr. Andrew Paul 314 South Missouri Avenue Suite 311 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-05033 at 727 Bay Esplanade. Dear Mr. Paul: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 29, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a new detached dwelling unit in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district including: A front (north) setback reduction to building from 25 feet to five feet, a front (west) setback reduction to pavement from 25 feet to 10 feet, a rear, waterfront setback reduction to pool deck at existing grade from 10 feet to zero feet, an increase to the maximum building height to the stairwell and elevator equipment from 30 feet to 33.5 feet, and to allow a six foot tall aluminum fence in a front setback along the unimproved Aster Place right of way, as a Residential Infill Project, per section 2-203.C. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.141 acre subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 3. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as per Section 2-203.C of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; 2. The final layout of the site be consistent with the conceptual site plans submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; PRANK I IIIM,mm. MANOR JUIIN DoimN, CO( MAi.ALP:,MHW[R I I??rr I I:U ino.\, (: )( NC[1 ALI[NIBhR BILL OWNCII-INBER "Ir(L Li{,\IIT NIFNI AND ArriP,m:crlvr:Acno?N FMI)L<)WN" 0 Page 2 July 17, 2006 FLS2006-05033 0 3. Any future additions to the property be reviewed for compliance with the Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) of 0.65; 4. In the event construction of the top floor roof deck elevator is not provided, the tower shall comply with the maximum building height of 30 feet; 5. Provide a survey showing existing grades (spot elevations) on the subject site prior to the issuance of any building permit. Spot elevations should be in a grid format spaced every ten to twenty feet; 6. The pool deck shall not exceed 12 inches above existing grade; 7. No part of the structure(s) and/or landscaping shall be constructed within the right-of-way of Aster Place; 8. Parked vehicles shall not block City sidewalks per City Ordinance Section 30.041(1)(b); 9. A three foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the outside of the six foot tall fence along the reduced front setback from the Aster Place; 10. Show the trees on the site plan prior to the issuance of any building permits; 11. Any improvements, such as adjacent lot grading, that impact the city street end north of this lot are to be reviewed by the City Engineer and approved by means of a city right-of-way permit. Private landscaping of the street end by the adjacent owner is strongly discouraged. This is because that in a stormwater event the street end can allow stormwater to runoff when the city storm pipe system is overloaded; and 12. All mechanical and pool equipment be screened from the public right-of-ways and adjacent properties per section 3-903.H.1. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above twelve conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plans dated received July 03, 2006, the revised application dated received July 17, 2006, and the revised building elevations dated received July 17, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (July 17, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodtler, Planner H at (727) 5624547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director SAI'lanning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FLS)Unactive or Finished Cases\Bay Esplanade 727 - Goeckl (LMDR) JVS\FLS2006-05033 Development Order.doc Jul. 18 2006 04:06PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94614787 Jul.18 04:04PM 01'28 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##04. THEM SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). Pi 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER FLANKING DEPAR'T'MENT . Post Office Box 474$, Clearwater, Fkwida 33759-474.8 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 TelePhonc (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562.4576 Tune 23, 2006 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 .. ANDXF-W PAUL 314 S MIS-30URI AVE SUM 311 CLEARWATER, Ft, 33756 RE: F1 -R2005-12103 LOCATED AT - 727 BAY ESPLANADE Dear : ANDREW PAUL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Ccnmrnittee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding Your case number: F1..S2005-12103. These comments are generated early to give you assistance in }preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on: Thursday, June Z4, 2006 Please be prepared to address these oomments and any others that may be gnerated at the DRC- meeting. Resubmittals will not be awepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. if you have any cations about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins. at 727-SG2-4582. OG•21??? d evr ?' ^ Sinceely, -1 sTI?75 re Scv? - DWG ?mn5 as P John Schadtler, Planner ll .. q qtr abcrde- 1 cc: File hR t 34 (? oKC: Pre-DRC Commelitt Masi Ow I? Owner(s): Keith J Gloeckl 727 Bay Esplanade Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Andrew Paul ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 314 S Missouri Ave Suite 311 Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727461-5424, FAX: 727461-4787, E-MAIL: chrisk@metroarchitects.net Location: 0.141 acres located at the intersection of Bay Esplanade and Aster Street Atlas Page: 249A Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a new detached dwelling unit in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district including: A front (north) setback reduction to building from 25 feet to five feet, a front (west) setback reduction to pavement from 25 feet to 10 feet, and a rear, waterfront setback reduction to pool deck at existing grade from 10 feet to zero feet, and to allow a six foot tall aluminum fence in a front setback along the unimproved Aster Place right of way, as a Residential Infill Project, per section 2-203.C. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: John Schodder, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Per the plat, a 5 foot utility easement is located along the rear property line. Under no circumstances shall the structure(s) be constructed within the 5 foot utility easement. The City has no utilities in the 5 foot utility easement. - E a-5eme-< i5 W i'ttn W Ater IptyMA ;CA WA7 l 2. No part of the structure(s) and/or landscaping shall be constructed within the right-of-way of Aster Place. - We. D-) 10 Vnof' 40, R ¢ •u?1 3. Parked vehicles shall not block City sidewalk ppeer City Ordinance Section 30.041(1)(b). 4. Correct scale on site plan. We, w; U vAot blcek 51-ktu-nalk The above to be addressed prior to DO. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: I . No Issue Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: '' ? `` 1 . Show the trees on the site plan prior to building permit. t yes We W i«?t o - 52 e ?ric1 5 ttc `v?gtvl Landscaping: 1 , A three foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the outside of the six foot tall fence along the reduced front setback from the Aster Place r.o.w. Yes we- oA1 -Ao 6waw' # Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 29, 2006 - Page 43 No Comments Stormwater: 1 , Any improvements, such as adjacent lot grading, that impact the city street end north of this lot are to be reviewed by the City Engineer and approved by means of a city right-of-way permit. Private landscaping of the street end by the adjacent owner is strongly discouraged. This is because that in a stormwater event the street end can allow stormwater to runoff when the city f storm pipe system is overloaded. %42 0 i R not t'r? ? K otN 1 n 4Ko; ?° `'? ' - Solid Waste: ' No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Planning: I . Clarify. How is the front setback reduction to the paper right of way consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity other properties located similarly on paper right = of ways)? See. pktkos 0? t)nwk-f c nns knW- hrnu. &A re b 1aak Ko ry'a G 2. Clarify. How is the the reduced waterfront setback consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? PairLQ4 QQr -S Are. V rtn'?WD wi1M ACclrr'I JcOj ks, ei. lris . 3. Clarify. How does the proposed detached dwelling minimize adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory, and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent operties? R ly to each ?n seperately.--`S%4?T`"'""'t ? - gaud 6:-A ?+p c k \J ;;L sWCB? ?ad¢ T- 5. 4 . Review ISR numbers closely. requesting to cover entire 65 /o. &WAW lS With the entire ground floor op?een for s orage, explain the need for the one parking space in the front setback. 'its 1? 6%` cod trrigcW rtd "?;'c guts rkF - 6AL4I'A e6 is ri4,Traw 6. Revise the building elevations to include the maximum building height of the elevator equi? ¢aeJal uM' room from existing grade and from the base flood elevation. -this u1a? Acme - 5eAa 7. Revise residential infill criteria #4 to state something along the lines of a detached dwelling is a minimum standard and permitted use in the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district and compatible with adjacent properties. See 4 ACW t V49A 06-S-+ 8 Co12c1- 0% 8. Due to the property being located in a flood zone the Planning staff highly recommends a pre-construction meeting with one of the Building department's plans examiners. 'thus WAS A'AVg 4/2"(0 9. Provide a survey showing existing grades (spot elevations) on the subject site prior to the issuance of a building permit. Spot elevation should be in a grid format spaced every ten to twenty feet. Examples can be provided if needed. WQ wtll ptsutAA. e)CVAortg 10 . Clarify. What are the lines running north from the driveway and pool deck towards Aster r.o.w.? ( 11 . Revise residential infill criteria #5: How is the proposed building and lot design creating a form See a?4cYlftc and funtion that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of C.'Zq pg 3 Clearwater as a whole. Explain how. Ste q C Yt?o? 12. Revise residential infill criteria #7: Explain how are the proposed setback reductions (flexibility)? 208 3a are justified by the benefits to community character... and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 13. Revise residential infill criteria #3 to state something along the lines of a detached dwelling is a - See aA?avt? minimum standard and permitted use in the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district. redtwA 5h • 6/29• o$ 14. Revise residential infill criteria #1: How is the proposal otherwise impractical without deviation...? The owners plan requirements are not a hardship. A detached dwelling could be placed on this property and meet setback requirements. Perhaps, discuss the size character of detached dwellings in the neighborhood and further elaborate on the three 25 foot setback requirements. 54a -Ar-I LA re JiSRA -A - 3 48 • X0/29-08" 15 . Explain/clarify, why the need for so much square footage for the elevator equiptment enclosure (tower). upper kiiel cz44citns 6Joair•-clev-??roo?n c?rrtbar &VA is wtj +;-A Other: No Comments ORIGINAL Notes: RECEIVED JUL 03 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 29, 2006 - Page 44 i - - - -- - - ---- IRFMENTS (Residential . fill Proiect Criteria) re?lsed • 21, o& ROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved. in detail: )ment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and rar?rCel 1k.a. ?Q? IS on?N 5a? ?? t?i? pro ed Ke-U44"m 0,(\ SF AARY g re see} g?3? o1'?^^ itial infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting ae of the site with the improvements.) crPG fie. Uc1L) e o? ne???n?oorhooc?? nnS?firnn Ial?ndscaaiN.a ?.,? ac??i?tt?? a©o he City of Clearwater. ` 15 6 pp1\c6 Erwin 0$r 'in L&W MAdc. ?s? qt-,. tijatnG e with adjacent land uses. ?t••? above pa?"kc+ASi .resid?v?ce,. . tj54-'it'1 law #W.Q;A?J;ias. Yww'A function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity whole. - o '6A1S GpP? CLl11Q'Cl • t function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity whole. A parting are justified by the benefits to community character and the , V of Clearwater as a whole. ? rd e? ba?4?s g 3 imyA Eoxcel corc'ec?l_u _S. fie erode i°sed ° 120 c. ' c? Il b ev?e?rl? e. C.o%AVM0A Df Df I SK, 17 51 ".\IJA ORIGINAL RECEIVED SAPlanning DepartmentlApplication FmnsWevelopment mvieM20W FormslResidential Infill Project (FLD) 2006.doc J u L. 03 2006 Page 3 of 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Chris, • After review of the plan you e-mailed it is apparent that the tower has been lowered to the maximum allowable building height of 30 feet and is meeting code. However, I recommend looking at other options to meet this code, such as reducing the height of the clerestory windows to be able to maintain a roof design on the tower more in keeping with the rest of the building and still meet the 30 foot maximum height. Resubmit one set of all four building elevation for review. Thank you, John Schodtler Planner II -----Original Message----- From: Chris Kuckert [mailto:Chrisk@metroarchitects.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:46 AM To: Schodder, John Subject: 727 Bay Esplande Please see attached pdf of the elevation that has been changed so that the elevator tower top of roof is at 30' above BFE Thank You, Chris Kuckert Project Manager Metro Architects 727.461.5424 CHRISK(cDMETROARCHITECTS.NET ELEV. 9 +30'-00' A.BF ELEV. A +41'-00' A.S.L TOP OF ROOF LINE OF ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM ELEV.,m MEDIAN ROOF LINE ELEV. g +32'-09' TOP OF ROOF DECK ELEV. 9 +23'-9' THIRD LEVEL otE V. A +12'--15' SECOND LEVEL ELEV. 9 11'-0'5F-E. ELEV. 9 0'-'I5' FINISHED FLOOR °I mid 0000 0000 ?? 0000 FITYR FRONT ELEVATION SCALE I/a" = 1' 00 • • • Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John To: CHRISK@METROARCHITECTS.NET Subject: Remaining two comments for 727 Bay Esplanade r?CaseConditions.pdf 2:10 pm Case Number: FLS2006-050- 727 BAY ESPLANADE • r - Owner(s): Keith J Gloeck] 727 Bay Esplanade Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Andrew Paul 314 S Missouri Ave Suite 311 Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727461-5424, FAX: 727-4614787, E-MAIL: chrisk@metroarchitects.net Location: 0.141 acres located at the intersection of Bay Esplanade and Aster Street Atlas Page: 249A Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a new detached dwelling unit in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district including: A front (north) setback reduction to building from 25 feet to five feet, a front (west) setback reduction to pavement from 25 feet to 10 feet, and a rear, waterfront setback reduction to pool deck at existing grade from 10 feet to zero feet, and to allow a six foot tall aluminum fence in a front setback along the unimproved Aster Place right of way, as a Residential Infill Project, per section 2-203.C. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F7 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , Per the plat, a 5 foot utility easement is located along the rear property line. Under no circumstances shall the structure(s) be constructed within the 5 foot utility easement. The City has no utilities in the 5 foot utility easement. 2. No part of the structure(s) and/or landscaping shall be constructed within the right-of-way of Aster Place. 3. Parked vehicles shall not block City sidewalk per City Ordinance Section 30.041(1)(b). 4. Correct scale on site plan. The above to be addressed prior to DO. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: No Issue Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . Show the trees on the site plan prior to building permit. Landscaping: I , A three foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the outside of the six foot tall fence along the reduced front setback from the Aster Place r.o.w. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 29, 2006 - Page 43 Parks and Recreation: ' No Comments Stormwater: 1 . Any improvements, such as adjacent lot grading, that impact the city street end north of this lot are to be reviewed by the City Engineer and approved by means of a city right-of-way permit. Private landscaping of the street end by the adjacent owner is strongly discouraged. This is because that in a stormwater event the street end can allow stormwater to runoff when the city storm pipe system is overloaded. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Planning: 1 . Clarify. How is the front setback reduction to the paper right of way consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity (other properties located similarly on paper right of ways)? 2. Clarify. How is the the reduced waterfront setback consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity? 3. Clarify. How does the proposed detached dwelling minimize adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, olfactory, and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. 4. Review ISR numbers closely. requesting to cover entire 65%. 5. With the entire ground floor open for storage, explain the need for the one parking space in the front setback. 6. Revise the building elevations to include the maximum building height of the elevator equiptment room from existing grade and from the base flood elevation. 7. Revise residential infill criteria #4 to state something along the lines of a detached dwelling is a minimum standard and permitted use in the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district and compatible with adjacent properties. 8. Due to the property being located in a flood zone the Planning staff highly recommends a pre-construction meeting with one of the Building department's plans examiners. 9. Provide a survey showing existing grades (spot elevations) on the subject site prior to the issuance of a building permit. Spot elevation should be in a grid format spaced every ten to twenty feet. Examples can be provided if needed. 10. Clarify. What are the lines running north from the driveway and pool deck towards Aster r.o.w.? 11 . Revise residential infill criteria #5: How is the proposed building and lot design creating a form and funtion that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Explain how. 12. Revise residential infill criteria #7: Explain how are the proposed setback reductions (flexibility) are justified by the benefits to community character... and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 13. Revise residential infill criteria #3 to state something along the lines of a detached dwelling is a minimum standard and permitted use in the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district. 14. Revise residential infill criteria #1: How is the proposal otherwise impractical without deviation...? The owners plan requirements are not a hardship. A detached dwelling could be placed on this property and meet setback requirements. Perhaps, discuss the size character of detached dwellings in the neighborhood and further elaborate on the three 25 foot setback requirements. 15. Explain/clarify, why the need for so much square footage for the elevator equiptment enclosure (tower). Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 29, 2006 - Page 44 ! If µ • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 June 23, 2006 ANDREW PAUL 314 S MISSOURI AVE SUITE 311 CLEARWATER, FL 33756 RE: FLS2005-12103 LOCATED AT - 727 BAY ESPLANADE Dear : ANDREW PAUL The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-12103 . These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on: Thursday, June 29, 2006 Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, John Schodtler, Planner II cc: File DRC Pre-DRC Comments Mail Out Conditions Associated With ?` tkrl`g FLS2006-05033 727 BAY ESPLANADE Engineering Condition Roberta Gluski 562-4753 06/12/2006 Per the plat, a 5 foot utility easement is located along the rear property line. Under no Not Met circumstances shall the structure(s) be constructed within the 5 foot utility easement. The City has no utilities in the 5 foot utility easement. 2. No part of the structure(s) and/or landscaping shall be constructed within the right-of-way of Aster Place. 3. Parked vehicles shall not block City sidewalk per City Ordinance Section 30.041(1)(b). 4. Correct scale on site plan. The above to be addressed prior to DO. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562-4897 06/13/2006 No Issues Not Met Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 x3062 06/19/2006 No Issue Not Met Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 06/15/2006 A three foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the outside of the six foot tall fence along Not Met the reduced front setback from the Aster Place r.o.w. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 06/22/2006 Show the trees on the site plan prior to building permit. Not Met Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 06/08/2006 Any improvements, such as adjacent lot grading, that impact the city street end north of this lot Not Met are to be reviewed by the City Engineer and approved by means of a city right-of-way permit. Private landscaping of the street end by the adjacent owner is strongly discouraged. This is because that in a stormwater event the street end can allow stormwater to runoff when the city storm pipe system is overloaded. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 06/12/2006 No Issues. Not Met General Applicability Criteria #5 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 05/31/2006 Clarify. How is the front setback reduction to the paper right of way consistent with the community Not Met character of the immediate vicinity (other properties located similarly on paper right of ways)? 05/31/2006 Clarify. How is the the reduced waterfront setback consistent with the community character of the Not Met immediate vicinity? General Applicability Criteria #6 John Schodtler 727-562-4547 05/31/2006 Clarify. How does the proposed detached dwelling minimize adverse effects, including visual, Not Met acoustic, olfactory, and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties? Reply to each seperately. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 CaseConditons Print Date: 06/23/2006 Page 1 of 2 FLS2006-05033 727 BAY ESPLANADE Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 05/31/2006 Review ISR numbers closely. requesting to cover entire 65%. Not Met 05/31/2006 With the entire ground floor open for storage, explain the need for the one parking space in the Not Met front setback. 05/31/2006 Revise the building elevations to include the maximum building height of the elevator equiptment Not Met room from existing grade and from the base flood elevation. 05/31/2006 Revise residential infill criteria #4 to state something along the lines of a detached dwelling is a Not Met minimum standard and permitted use in the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district and compatible with adjacent properties. 05/31/2006 Due to the property being located in a flood zone the Planning staff highly recommends a Not Met pre-construction meeting with one of the Building department's plans examiners. 05/31/2006 Provide a survey showing existing grades (spot elevations) on the subject site prior to the Not Met issuance of a building permit. Spot elevation should be in a grid format spaced every ten to twenty feet. Examples can be provided if needed. 06/15/2006 Clarify. What are the lines running north from the driveway and pool deck towards Aster r.o.w.? Not Met 05/31/2006 Revise residential infill criteria #5: How is the proposed building and lot design creating a form Not Met and funtion that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Explain how. 05/31/2006 Revise residential infill criteria #7: Explain how are the proposed setback reductions (flexibility) Not Met are justified by the benefits to community character... and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 05/31/2006 Revise residential infill criteria #3 to state something along the lines of a detached dwelling is a Not Met minimum standard and permitted use in the Low Medium Density Residential zoning district. 05/31/2006 Revise residential infill criteria #1: How is the proposal otherwise impractical without deviation...? Not Met The owners plan requirements are not a hardship. A detached dwelling could be placed on this property and meet setback requirements. Perhaps, discuss the size character of detached dwellings in the neighborhood and further elaborate on the three 25 foot setback requirements. 06/22/2006 Explain/clarify, why the need for so much square footage for the elevator equiptment enclosure Not Met (tower). Print Date: 06/23/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 2 Jun. 23 2006 07:56AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94614787 Jun.23 07:54AM 01'38 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). LL CITY OF CLEARWATER o? earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARWATER. C OM June 07, 2006 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 727 BAY ESPLANADE (FLS2006-05033) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 727 BAY ESPLANADE, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a new detached dwelling unit in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district including: A front (north) setback reduction to building from 25 feet to five feet, a front (west) setback reduction to pavement from 25 feet to 10 feet, and a rear, waterfront setback reduction to pool deck at existing grade from 10 feet to zero feet, and to allow a six foot tall aluminum fence in a front setback along the unimproved Aster Place right of way, as a Residential Infill Project, per section 2-203.C.. On June 29, 2006, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be June 29, 2006. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-5624547 or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on June 29, 2006. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Q&6V.WAJ*L4X- John Schodtler Planner 11 PLANNING & DE V L L i SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWAIN Letter ofNotifcation - FLS2006-05033 - 727 MYESPLANADE CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 99KATEk;?oP' POST OITICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 x H MEfE4717445 st WEYA999 946831292 1406 50 06/25/06 FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND WEYANT 422 N MAIN ST PLAINS PA 18705-1420 RETURN TO SENDER h? WEYANT, JAMES R III CARDONI-WEYANT, KRISTI A 51 ACACIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1404 ti '' CITY OF CLEARWATER ; PLANNING DEPAIMAENT 99?ATEREV? Posy OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 nr)P TAi)Y. DGN- A-M R For Additional Rf 11.41" ? ? ?'? ifNRiR Postage $ / SENDER: Remove label, affix correct postage and remail. fV H MET,ER717445 11_? DORMOR6 TS H9? 43n10 1.6306 09 06/?i./06 DORMADY'DONALD R 21 QUEEN MARY DR 5T CATMARINE5 ONTARIO LRR2J3 CANADA ir?t' I1 FICKEL, TERRENCE L • SMITH, MARK A FICKEL, RANDALL L SMITH, CHARLENE S 9917 ARCHER LN 701 BAY ESPLANADE DUBLIN OH 43017 - 7977 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 LITTLER, BRUCE C LITTLER, CAROL A 711 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 ROBERDS, ROGER 0 ROBERDS, ELEANOR A 715 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 BROWN, DEBRA P GARRICK, EARL T 723 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 OHLEYER, SUSAN THE 733 BAY ESPLANADE LAND TRUST 2445 TAMPA RD STE B PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5849 MENNA, ARMELIA 755 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1412 COQUINA APTS INC 692 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1500 HALGREN, RALPH W HALGREN, VELORA B 56 SOMERSET ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543 BROWNE, PATRICK T 727 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1417 LINDBLOM, TIMOTHY ROBKE, MOLLY 721 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1417 GALASSO, MICHAEL GALASSO, DAWN 727 BAY ESPLANADE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 STAUTZ, BETSY H 739 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1437 MEROLI, PETRIT 967 ELDORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1020 LEWINSKI, HANNA LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH 661 POINSETTA AVE #306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 FRIARS MINOR ORD OF ST FRANCIS PROVINCIAL CURIA 147 THOMPSON ST NEW YORK NY 10012 - 3110 COYNE, JAMES P 190 HYATT AVE YONKERS NY 10704 - 3601 DORMADY, DONALD R 26 EDINBORO CIR CHALFONT PA 18914 - 2262 WELLS, DARCY NALEY, STEPHEN 705 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 MERRIAM, RICHARD P 717 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1409 MARTUCCI, MICHAEL MARTUCCI, ELIZABETH 731 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1437 HUPP, ANDREW J HUPP, LILY 745 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1437 SPRING TIDE INVESTMENTS II LLC 622 BYPASS DR STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 5002 LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH LEWINSKI, HANNA 60 SOMERSET # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1543 WILLIAMS, CHRISTIAN J 729 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1417 JENSEN, ERIKA H THE 723 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1417 BONNINGTON, ROSEMARIE S FURNISS, J STEVEN GALLAGHER, PATRICK J BONNINGTON, ALEXANDER D FURNISS, ROBIN Z GALLAGHER, BEVERLY B 732 BAY ESPLANADE 730 BAY ESPLANADE 726 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1410 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1410 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1410 JOHNSON, GREGG C JOHNSON, LILLIAN I 720 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1415 SCHAMBER, PATSY THE 708 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1415 THOMAS, DIANE.B THOMAS, TERRY N 2 BIG BEAR LN PALM COAST FL 32137 - 9356 DVORNIK, DONALD F DVORNIK, SUSAN E 52 ASTER ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1406 HORGAN, DANIEL B HORGAN, ROISIN A 710 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1408 COMB, JEAN J 287 PILGRIM BIRMINGHAM MI 48009 - 4610 DANIEL, HAROLD M DANIEL, JANICE V 713 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1416 GIRDLER, JEAN C THE GIRDLER, NICHOLAS M THE 732 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1410 MASTORIDES, NICHOLAS MASTORIDES, LACEY 2187 VIOLA DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3738 c(c HARROD, HOWARD HARRLD, BETTY J 716 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1415 ow MILLHOUSE, DEAN A GILL, SHARON R 704 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1415 WHITING, J RODGER HARRAH, HAROLD D 929 LANTANA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1127 WOEMPNER, JOACHIM REINSTAEDTLER, DIETER 55 IRIS ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1425 PUTYRSKI, ANNE M 56 ACACIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1405 LOCKE, WILLIAM R 47 ACACIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1404 GLEASON, WILLIAM J GLEASON, KRISTIN J 53 ASTER ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1407 SAGONIAS, NICK EST 235 OLD OAK CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5862 WELPTON, MARY ELIZABETH 462 MAIN ST STE 300 WATERTOWN MA 02472 - 2246 ANDRESON, CONSTANCE 712 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1415 GARRIS, BERLE SR GARRIS, ANNE M 38 ACACIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1403 JAMES, KRISTINE M 53 IRIS ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1425 HARKINS, FRANCES E 57 IRIS ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1425 SONDERMANN, WILFRIED & HELGARD SONDERMANN, WILFRIED BEN 52 ACACIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1405 NAPOLI, JOHN D 709 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1416 BROUZET, THIERRY M 57 ASTER ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1407 MURPHY, VICKI A FALASKY, DOROTHY A PO BOX 3505 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 -8505 WEYANT, JAMES R III CARDONI-WEYANT, KRISTI A 51 ACACIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1404 SAGONIAS, STAMATINA LOCKE, WILLIAM R LEARY, EDWARD B JR THE 235 OLD OAK CIR 47 ACACIA ST PMB 331 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5862 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1404 30 JERICHO TPKE COMMACK NY 11725 - 3009 Clearwater U June 06, 2006 Andrew Paul 314 S Missouri Ave Suite 311 Clearwater, F133756 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM RE: FLS2006-05033 -- 727 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Andrew Paul : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2006-05033. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 29, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodder Planner II Letter of Completeness - FLS2006-05033 - 727 BAYESPLANADE Jun. 06 2006 03:33PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94614787 Jun.06 03:32PM 00'49 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). • Schodtler, John ® Page 1 of 1 From: Schodtler, John Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:08 PM To: 'Chris Kuckert' Subject: RE: 727 Bay Esplande Excellent. 15 copies will be just fine. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Kuckert [mailto:Chrisk@metroarchitects.net] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 2:36 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: 727 Bay Esplande John, Yes we will be putting a 6' high aluminum fence off the rear corner of the house to the seawall. I have made the change to the plans. Do you need 15 copies of this change. Thank You, Chris Kuckert Project Manager Metro Architects 727.461.5424 CHRISK(o)-METROARCHITECTS.NET 6/5/2006 . r ((w METRO ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN TRANSMITTAL FORM PLANNING ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS 31-1 S. (`,:iiSS 1. RI AVIE 7271.1.615-2 = SUITE. I' 311 ,LE!':{ ';r11r11 1'i. FL. "'27. '. 5 i F, 7 .- 3:,'r2S TO: l T? FROM: f T COMPANY NAME: / ?. \. aw?"NrJ r?I DATE: STREET TOTAL NO. OF SHEET: SUITE SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: CITY STATE ZIP CODE YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER: RE: S o?ocs - o,?0 3 ? URGENT ? FOR REVIEW ? PLEASE COMMENT ? PLEASE REPLY ? PLEASE RECYCLE QTY ITEM DESCRIPTION /S Cm Ntl o IF im /J -4 v 9- IA .,s,..? s OPIGIAJA JUN RE n ti ?nna NOTES/COMMENTS: ;a??7 DING DEPAI?Tne OF CLEARWATER 0 METROI ARCHITECTS PLANNING ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS 314 S. MISSOURI AVE 727.461.5424 T SUITE 4311 CLEARWATER, FL 727.461.4787 F 33756 Date: June 5, 2006 Attn: John Schodtler Re: FLS2006-05033 Jobsite: 727 Bay Esplanade The following revisions were made to address the items in your letter of incompleteness: 1. 15 copies of site plan with added information is attached 2. 1 copy of color elevation w/ color swatches and floor plans is attached Highest Regards, . l?f tl f ! S ? ???. II 1P ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN 0 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Page 1 of 2 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 1:05 PM To: 'Chris Kuckert' Subject: RE: FLS2006-05033 - 727 BAY ESPLANADE 15 of the site plan 1 each of the others -----Original Message----- From: Chris Kuckert [mailto:Chrisk@metroarchitects.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 11:26 AM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Re: FLS2006-05033 - 727 BAY ESPLANADE Thank you, for your response, just one more question how many copies of each do we need to submit. Thank You, Chris Kuckert Project Manager Metro Architects 727.461.5424 C H R I S K(cD_ M ET ROARC H I TECTS. N ET ----- Original Message ----- From: John.Schodtler(c?myClearwater.com To: Chrisk : metroarchitects.net Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 11:15 AM Subject: RE: FLS2006-05033 - 727 BAY ESPLANADE Chris/Andy, Your application was exacting to the application. However, sometime exact is not helpful when it comes to reviewing the plans. 1. Provide a proposed site plan and do not show existing development. a. scale 1:20 or 30 is ok b. size is not to exceed 24" x36" 2. For the floor plan and roofing plan any size or scale is acceptable. 3. For the building elevations any size or scale is acceptable. With the above additional items there should be less questions at the DRC and a quicker turn around time should the board find the application sufficient to be approved. Thank you, John Schodtler Planner II -----Original Message----- 5/30/2006 0 Page 2 of 2 From: Chris Kuckert [mailto:Chrisk@metroarchitects.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:50 AM To: Schodtler, John Subject: FLS2006-05033 - 727 BAY ESPLANADE Mr. Schodtler, We received the notice of the incomplete submittal for this variance application. Please let us know what are the drawing requirements, ie, scale and sheet size for additional 3 plans required for this submittal. We had followed everything on the application that was shown to us and checked off and these requirements were not on there for the variance we are requesting. Please advise so we can meet the deadline of next Tues. the 6th of June Thank You, Chris Kuckert Project Manager Metro Architects 727.461.5424 CHRISK(cDMETROARCHITECTS.NET Andy Paul Senoir Architect 5/30/2006 10 . 0 Page 1 of 1 Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 11:16 AM To: 'Chris Kuckert' Subject: RE: FLS2006-05033 - 727 BAY ESPLANADE Chris/Andy, Your application was exacting to the application. However, sometime exact is not helpful when it comes to reviewing the plans. 1. Provide a proposed site plan and do not show existing development. a. scale 1:20 or 30 is ok b. size is not to exceed 24" x36" 2. For the floor plan and roofing plan any size or scale is acceptable. 3. For the building elevations any size or scale is acceptable. With the above additional items there should be less questions at the DRC and a quicker turn around time should the board find the application sufficient to be approved. Thank you, John Schodtler Planner II -----Original Message----- From: Chris Kuckert [mailto:Chrisk@metroarchitects.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:50 AM To: Schodtler, John Subject: FLS2006-05033 - 727 BAY ESPLANADE Mr. Schodtler, We received the notice of the incomplete submittal for this variance application. Please let us know what are the drawing requirements, ie, scale and sheet size for additional 3 plans required for this submittal. We had followed everything on the application that was shown to us and checked off and these requirements were not on there for the variance we are requesting. Please advise so we can meet the deadline of next Tues. the 6th of June Thank You, Chris Kuckert Project Manager Metro Architects 727.461.5424 CHRISK METROARCHITECTS.NET Andy Paul Senoir Architect 5/30/2006 Clearwater May 26, 2006 Andrew Paul 314 S Missouri Ave Suite 311 Clearwater, F133756 CITY OF CLE RWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM RE: FLS2006-05033 -- 727 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Andrew Paul : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2006-05033. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide a seperate site plan that only shows the proposed structures (house, sidewalks, pool, decks, driveways, etc). Include setback and building & pool dimensions. 2. Provide one copy of the proposed floor plans and roofing plan to assess and verify maximum building height. 3. Provide one colored building elevation. Include color swatchs and indicate exterior material types on the plans. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Tuesday, June 6, 2006 (12:00 noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner II Letter of Incompleteness - FLS2006-05033 - 727 BAY ESPLANADE May. 26 2006 04:04PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94614787 May.26 04:03PM 00'50 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). FLS2006-05033 727 Bay Esplanade 6/15/2006 Subject property - 727 Bay Esplanade. Front (west) elevation. Notice undeveloped Aster Place r.o.w. 1'1 G??;it 1•" 7'M l Ago Front yard of subject property. The existing front setback to the building is 20.8 feet. Back yard of subject property. Almost entirely impervious. y? r i All 1H ? ?SP,, ` 6 f 4'S '? 41 % Back yard of subject property. n' Note, existing grade appears to protrude above the top of the seawall. Adak AAL, Ito 3 ® ' . all S • / Liii, Iliiiii? ...._ _ _ ",-tee Rear of property from the boat dock. r The dock system. AWL i- -?w.wiyes?Ar F! t s? wr Previously approved one foot front setback reduction to Aster R.O.W. Note: Hedge is located in R.O.W. The front (north) building line. Property north of the Aster Place r.o.w. Aster Place r.o.w. Aster Place r.o.w. Adjacent property to the south. 7 ? n PoN"? Y,c' 'r r _ I I III C • °? ? }?A?,?`, WJZ WJkll 4 I r? ? s . -5-__ Ill III A I? Rear, waterfront setback appears to be non-conforming to the 25 foot requirement. Adjacent property seawall and fencing. Similar Corner lots with public access right of ways along Bay Esplanade AMID, L-j ra 5 6OWN tRLrNG PCFPLfPi G u rr m - - VERBEMA GO Il Au G IRIS AS ?2 7 BAY ESP, E A CIA L3h' RSET DLEWILD w E2 LENDAIF C-001 HEILWOn- a., 841 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Gardenia R.O.W (public access). Note: FLS2005-09072 approved a five foot front setback to the Gardenia R.O.W. Gardenia R.O.W (public access). w 839 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Gardenia R.O.W (public access). Adak 7?. ra NI perpurc KIPLI N a i ROERIA AANGO w lu 8pi:18 T .2 7 , BAY ESPLANADE-_ W(T SOMERSET ° DICO fLL W LEI' DA4L E i - F.UJ 0 E1 L1dk OO A A Oki f. 821 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Verbena R.O.W (public access). Verbena R.O.W (public access). 819 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Verbena R.O. W (public access). .... a 819 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Verbena R.O.W (public access). AML Ah jLAIUFi ?+Q ??ii ?l,i yy S s1M V {J?Y FfFRUN KFPLIN U3 cn C+aRDERIA m il'EFaaE hFA FJ 17D - MANGO I ?? ? pct RIS TE t 727.. BAY ESPLANADE-, ACACIA Hill ?C3It'ERSET Ldp` MBRI A lt?L.OWLD r . Ll rl ?w LENDAL-E 0 EFL 0o n 0-19 801 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Mango R.O. W (public access). ii 785 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Mango R.O.W (public access). Note: FLS2005-03022 approved two foot front setback to Mango R.O.W. Not f yet constructed. Adak S 5ss N KfUN KfPLIpjG t? 13A RIIE?[A Cr WE ERA q G to r 7 . BA's ESPLANADE ?A+fA SOMERSET 8 5R'IA DLEVW#l LE I Een LENDALE S . FED] 0 1111 '1 a.? 11 ? T17-7 71 R ti? x - K '?' Its r J 1? t. 755 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Iris R.O. W (public access). 745 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Iris R.O.W (public access). Note: FLS2003-11055 approved five foot front setback to Iris R.O.W. Ask U Tr _ _ E N19 u Vs -A K I LjN(3 KIPUM c 0 VERSENA 00 t c IRIS 727 BAY ESPLANADE -: _.. ,,,, a eft ?, wl ?- CACNA OXERSET IA TW, I w ;E rGLENDALE 10 a- HEaL'il fOOD 731 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Aster R.O. W (public access). a. C Y F Subject Property - 727 Bay Esplanade Frontage on Aster R.O. W (public access). v Pinellas County Property Apprai_er Information: 05 29 15 54666 035 006 Page 2 of 5 i 05 I 29 1 15 1 54600 / 035 / 0070 30-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:24:24 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales OLOECKL, KEITH J OBK: 14885 OPG: 2648 727 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767-1409 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 727 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2003 - 2004: 821,400 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 1 /2,006 14,885/2,648 1,150,000 (Q) I 1926: Book 014 Pgs 032-035 1112,002 12,339/ 629 220,000 (0) I 0000: Book Pgs - 10/1,998 10,255/1,437 219,006 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 5 /1,986 6,2221 671 153,000 (Q) I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 700,600 Homestead: YES Ownership % 1.000 UAL ADDED OVER CAP Govt Exem: NO Use %: 1.000 Assessed/Cap: 515,700 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 490,700 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: YES Frontage: Bay Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 11,402.49 1) 58 x 111 11, 000.00 58.00 F Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 15, 699.05 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 16, 279.98 Short Legal MANDALAY SUB BLK 35, LOT 7 Description Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t3=1 &u=0&p... 5/30/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprair Information: 05 29 15 54666 035 006 Page 3 of 5 or i Property and Land Use Code descriptions 05 / 29 / 15 / 5400E / 035 0070 :01 30-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:24:24 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use: 210 Land Use: 01 Living Units: i Imp Type: Single Family Prop Address: 727 BAY ESPLANADE Srtructural E1?ments Foundation Continuous Wall Floor System Wood Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reclad Roof Frame Flat-Shed Roof Cover B U Tar&Gravel/Othr # Stories 1.0 Floor Finish Crpt/HdTI/HdMar/Prgt Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Quality Year Built Effective Heating Cooling Fixtures Other Depr Functional Econonomic Average 1,947 Age 20 Central Duct Cooling (Central) 6 sciation 0 Depreciation 0 Depreciation 0 Sub AriB as . Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 1,804 7) . 00 0 2) Enclosed Porch .60 144 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .20 146 9) .00 0 4) Garage .25 574 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 RE:s1ClEnT1a1 Extra F?atur?s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) DOCK 834 30.00 834 25,020 15,010 11990 2) FIREPLACE AUG 2,500.00 1 2,500 1,400 1,947 3) BT LFT/DAU JETSKI 3,000.00 2 6,000 5,520 21002 4) PATIO/DECK 7.50 746 5,600 4,140 1,996 5) BT LFT/DAU 13K 101000.00 1 10,000 9,200 2,002 6) BT LFT/DAU MANUAL 750.00 2 1,500 1,500 2,002 TOTAL RECORD VAL UE: 36,770 Map With 2006 Sales (Red), 2005 Sales (Green), 2004 Sales (Blue) F*_1 F41op. Ft-1 41 FUR] http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t3=1 &u=0&p... 5/30/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprar Information: 05 29 15 54666 035 006 M. I STREET ,'STREET 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) LILL] IR15 Page 4 of 5 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l&a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t3=1 &u=0&p... 5/30/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprailzcl- Information: 05 29 15 54666 035 004, Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back_to. Search _Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.2&s=3&t3=1 &u=0&p... 5/30/2006 § 2-104 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other development standards are justi- fied by the benefits to community charac- ter and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. E. Schools. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on a major arterial; 2. All off-street parking is located at least 200 feet from any property used for resi- dential purposes or is designated as resi- dential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. All outdoor lighting is designed and lo- cated so that no light fixture is within 200 feet from the nearest existing building used for residential purposes and so that no light falls on residential property. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6595-00, § 1, 9-7-00; Ord. No. 7413-05, § 2, 5-5-05; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 38, 12-15-05) DIVISION 2. LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ("LMDR") Section 2-201. Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Low Medium Density Residential District ("LMDR") is to pro- tect and preserve the integrity and value of exist- ing, stable residential neighborhoods of low to 10 medium density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revi- talization of such neighborhoods in need of revi- talization or neighborhoods with unique ameni- ties which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the City. Section 2-201.1. Maximum development po- tential. The Low Medium Density Residential District ("LMDR") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the LMDR District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the LMDR District shall be deter- mined by the standards found in this Develop- ment Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. Develop- ment potential for the Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the LMDR Dis- trict are as follows: Countywide Future Maximum Dwelling Maximum Floor Land Use Units per Acre of Area Ratio11mper- Designation Land vious Surface Ratio Residential Low 5 dwelling units FAR.40/ISR .65 per acre Residential Urban 7.5 dwelling units FAR.40/ISR .65 per acre (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 3, 12-15-05) Section 2-202. Minimum standard development. The following uses are Level One permitted uses in the LMDR District subject to the minimum standards set out in this section and other applicable provisions of Article 3. Table 2-202. -LMDR" District Minimum Standard Development use Min. Lot Size (sq. ft.) Min. Lot Width (ft.) Min. Setbacks (fl.) Max. Height (ft.) Min. Off-Street Parking Front Side Rear(1) Community Residential Homes (up to 6 residents) 5,000 50 25 5 10 30 2/unit Detached Dwellings 5,000 50 25 5 10 30 2/unit (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, Section 3-805 and Division 9, Section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on Supp. No. 15 CD2:12 s • ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-203 either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ("LMDR') MINIMUM STANDARD DEVELOPMENT LOT AREA SF(d) 10 SETBACK REAR ' FEET i (EXCEPT WATERFRONT] CRH 74-)1 SETBACK REAR ;FEET ACCESSORY TU STRUCTURES = i SETBACK REAR FEET I ACCESSORY STR.UCTXJRES SETBACK: SIDE I FEET SF(d) ?....5 _., SETBACK SOE CRH? 5? SETBACK: SIDE F! EET i 5,000 S.F. 5,000 S .F. -- -- CR i Aciissrxerrrnc?cTi?s NIA E LOT WIDTH SF(CR 50 FEET CRH 50 FEET ACOMSDRYSMcW J? NIA MAX HEKGHT SF(d) 30 FEET C?RH I 30 FEET SF(d) SETBACK: FRONT 25 FEET CRH 25 SETBACK FRONT FEET LMDR Minimum Standard Development Diagram (Ord. No. 6417-99, § 2, 8-19-99; Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, §§ 4, 5, 5-2-02; Ord. No. 7449-05, §§ 4, 5, 12-15-05) Section 2-203. Flexible standard develop- ment. The following Level One uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this Section and other applica- ble regulations in Article 3. Supp. No. 15 CD2:13 0 0 § 2-203 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Table 2-203. 'LMDR" District Flexible Standard Deuelopment I Min. Lot Size Min. Lot Use (sq. ft•I Width (ft.) Min. Setbacks (ft.) Max. Height (ft.) Min. Off-Street Parking Front Side Rear(1) Attached Dwellings 10,000 100 25 10 15 30 21unit Detached Dwellings 5,000 50 15-25 5 5-15 30 2/unit Residential Infill Projects(3) n/a n/a 10-25 0-5 0-15 30 Z %unit Utility/Infrastructure Facilities(2) n/a n/a 25 10 15 n/a n/a (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article 3 Division 8, section 3-805 and Division 9, section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from any seawall. (2) Utility/infrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Transportation which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (3) The development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria set forth in Section 2-203(C). Flexibility Criteria: A. Attached dwellings. 1. The parcel proposed for development is a corner lot and is vacant on the date of adoption of this Development Code; 2. The buildings are designed with front setbacks on both streets; 3. Off-street parking is screened from adja- cent parcels of land by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height; 4. No more than two of the front doors of the dwelling units front on a single street; 5. The development of the attached dwell- ings does not require the removal of a protected tree; 6. The dwelling units are contained in no more than two buildings; 7. The buildings are consistent with the ar- chitectural style of existing dwellings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro- posed for development; within the boundaries of a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not less than 90 percent of the average lot area, lot width and setbacks of all im- proved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Im- mediate Vicinity Area and the height does not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located within the Neighborhood Conservation Im- mediate Vicinity Area. B. Detached dwellings. Front setback: a. A determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighbor- hood have been constructed to a reg- ular or uniform set back from the right-of-way; b. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent prop- erty values. 8. The parcel proposed for development is not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District, or if the parcel is c. The reduction in front setback is consistent with neighborhood char- acter; and Supp. No. 15 CD2:14 t ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-204 d. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an efficient house layout. 2. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for. the preservation of existing vegetation which could not other- wise be preserved; or b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelop- ment of a substandard lot which would otherwise not be feasible; or c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout; and d. The structures located within the rear setback otherwise required in the LMDR District are buffered with landscape material or fences to pro- tect the privacy and value of adja- cent properties. 3. Side setback: The reduction in side set- back will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not other- wise be preserved. C. Residential infill projects: 1. Single-family detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential infill project application; 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is other- wise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following. intensity; other development standards; 3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; Supp. No. 15 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicin- ity of the parcel proposed for develop- ment; 7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking access or other development standards are justi- fied by the benefits to community charac- ter and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. D. Utility/infrastructure facilities. 1. No above ground structures are located adjacent to a street right-of-way; 2. Any above ground structure other than permitted telecommunication towers and utility distribution lines located on or along a rear lot line shall be screened from view by a landscaped opaque wall or fence which is at least two-thirds the height of the above ground structure and shall be landscaped with trees and hedges which five years after installation will substantially obscure the fence or wall and the above ground structure. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6680-01, § 2, 4-5-01; Ord. No. 7413-05, § 3, 5-5-05; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 38, 12-15-05) Section 2-204. Flexible development. The following Level Two uses are permitted in the LMDR District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applica- ble regulations in Article 3. CD2:15 § 2-204 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Table 2-204. "LMDR" District Flexible Development Min. Lot Size Min. Lot Max. Height Min. Off -Street Use (sq. ft.) Width (ft.) Min. Setbacks (ft.) (ft.) Parking Front Side Rear(1) Attached Dwellings 10,000 100 25 5 15 30 2/unit Detached Dwellings 3'000- 5,000 25-50 15-25 2-5 5-15 30 2/unit Non-Residential Off-Street Parking n/a n/a 25 10 10 n/a n/a 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as determined by Parks and Recreation Facilities n/a n/a 35 20 25 30 the community development director based on ITE Manual standards Residential Infill Projects(2) n/a n/a 10-25 0-15 30 7 _*unit Schools 40,000 200 35 25 15 30 V. students (1) Waterfront detached dwellings in LMDR District should be 25 feet except as provided in Article. 3 Division 8, Section 3-805 and Division 9, Section 3-904 and except where adjacent structures on either side of the parcel proposed for development are setback 20 feet and then the rear setback shall be 20 feet. The Building Code may require the rear setback to be at least 18 feet from a seawall. (2) The development standards for residential infill projects are guidelines and may be varied based on the criteria specified in Section 2-204(E). Flexibility Criteria: 7. The buildings are consistent with the ar- chitectural style of existing dwellings in A. Attached dwellings. the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro- posed for development; 1. The parcel proposed for development is a 8 corner lot and 'is vacant on the date of The parcel proposed for development is adoption of this Development Code; not located in a designated Neighborhood Conservation District; or if the parcel is 2. The buildings are designed with front within the boundaries of a designated setbacks on both streets; Neighborhood Conservation District, the lot area, lot width and setbacks are not 3. Off-street parking is screened from adja- less than 90 percent of the average lot cent parcels of land by a landscaped wall area, lot width and setbacks of all im- or fence of at least four feet in height; proved parcels of land which are located within the Neighborhood Conservation Im- 4. No more than two dwelling units front on mediate Vicinity Area and the height does a single street; not exceed 120 percent of the average height of buildings and structures located 5. The development of attached dwellings within the Neighborhood Conservation Im- does not require the removal of a pro- mediate Vicinity Area. tected.tree; B. Detached dwellings. 6. The dwelling units are contained in no 1. Minimum lot size per dwelling of less more than two buildings; than 5,000 square feet is an existing lot or Supp. No. 15 CD2:16 ZONING DISTRICTS a lot size of less than 5,000 square feet is necessary to the development or redevel- opment of a vacant lot which would oth- erwise not be economically feasible; 2. Access is provided to each lot by frontage on a public street or by an easement of access at least 15 feet in width; 3. The volume to lot size ratio of the struc- tures to be developed on the lot is no more than ten percent greater than the average volume to lot size ratio of all existing structures within 500 feet of the lot; 2. 4. Front setback: a. The existing structures along the same side of the road have been constructed with irregular setbacks and the proposed reduction in front setback will not be out of character with the neighborhood; b. The extent to which existing struc- tures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform set back from the right-of-way; C. The reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent prop- erty values; 5. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not other- wise be preserved; or b. The reduction in rear setback will allow the development or redevelop- ment of a substandard structure which would otherwise not be feasi- ble; or c. The reduction results in an efficient house layout. 6. Side setback: The reduction in side set- back will allow for the preservation of existing vegetation which could not other- wise be preserved. C. Non-residential off-street parking. 1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the Supp. No. 15 CD2:17 § 2-204 non-residential use which will be served by the off--street parking spaces, is located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for develop- ment is located immediately across a pub- lic road from the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off- street parking does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of the street. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached dwellings in the LMDR District or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within ten feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel proposed for development and the parcel on which the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces. 3. Off-street parking spaces are screened by a wall or fence of at least three feet in height which is landscaped on the exter- nal side with a continuous hedge or non- deciduous vine. 4. All outdoor lighting is automatically switched to turn off at 9:00 p.m. 5. All parking spaces shall be surface park- ing. D. Parks and recreation facilities. 1. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding properties. 2. Off-street parking is screened from adja- cent parcels of land and any street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 3. All outdoor lighting is designed so that no light fixtures cast light directly on adja- cent land used for residential purposes. 4. The characteristics of the parcel proposed for development are such that the uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces than otherwise required or that 0 0 § 2-204 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE the use of significant portions of the prop- erty will be use for passive recreational purposes. E. Residential infill projects. 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is other- wise impractical without deviations from one or more of the following: intensity; other development standards; feet from the nearest existing building used for residential purposes and so that no light falls on residential property. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6595-00, § 2, 9-7-00; Ord. No. 7413-05, § 4, 5-5-05; Ord. No. 7449-05, § 38, 12-15-05) DIVISION 3. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ("MDR") 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicin- ity of the parcel proposed for develop- ment; 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, ac- cess or other development standards are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. F. Schools. 1. The parcel proposed for development fronts on a major arterial street; 2. All off-street parking is located at least 200 feet from any property used for resi- dential purposes or is designated as resi- dential in the Zoning Atlas; 3. All outdoor lighting is designed and lo- cated so that no light fixture is within 200 Section 2-301. Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Medium Density Residential District ("MDR") is to protect and preserve the integrity and value of existing, sta- ble residential neighborhoods of medium density while at the same time, allowing a careful and deliberate redevelopment and revitalization of existing neighborhoods in need of revitalization or neighborhoods with unique amenities which create unique opportunities to increase property values and the overall attractiveness of the-City. Section 2-301.1. Maximum development po- tential. The Medium Density Residential District ("MDR") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the MDR District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by State law. The development potential of a parcel of land with the MDR District shall be deter- mined by the standards found in this Develop- ment Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. Develop- ment potential for the County wide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the MDR District are as follows: Countywide Future Maximum Dwelling Maximum Floor Land Use Units per Acre of Area Ratio oHmper- Designation Land uious Surface Ratio Residential Urban 7.5 dwelling units FAR.40/ISR .65 per acre Residential Low 10 dwelling units FAR.50/ISR .75 Medium per acre Residential Me- 15 dwelling units FAR.50/ISR .75 dium per acre Residential/Office 15 dwelling units FAR.50/ISR .75 General per acre Supp. No. 15 CD2:18 `?1R ? E irrr LONG RANGE PLANNING D .VI?1,0P1\41?Nl' Ri-xii.,W July 17, 2006 Mr. Andrew Paul 314 South Missouri Avenue Suite 311 Clearwater, FL 33756 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos'r 0ri:iu: Box 4748, CLEARWA-11T, FLorw)A 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Souni Mvirru; AvEN1:1, CI.IiAR\VA'I'ER, F oj?iDA 33756 FLITHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE # CASE TYPE 1.s DRC DATE 06 2-9 aL CDB DATE SIGNATURE DATE 0 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2006-05033 at 727 Bay Esplanade. Dear Mr. Paul: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On June 29, 2006, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development approval to construct a new detached dwelling unit in the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) district including: A front (north) setback reduction to building from 25 feet to five feet, a front (west) setback reduction to pavement from 25 feet to 10 feet, a rear, waterfront setback reduction to pool deck at existing grade from 10 feet to zero feet, an increase to the maximum building height to the stairwell and elevator equipment from 30 feet to 33.5 feet, and to allow a six foot tall aluminum fence in a front setback along the unimproved Aster Place right of way, as a Residential Infill Project, per section 2-203.C. The DRC APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.141 acre subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 3. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as per Section 2-203.C of the Community Development Code; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. The final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; 2. The final layout of the site be consistent with the conceptual site plans submitted to, or as modified by, the DRC; FR:\xn I111M RI), I\Inv(iR .)OIIN Onr,:??, (.()l"MA VP:WWR I IM-1 I 1:\W1.1'()N, 0H M' I0II.N11WR BILL Jcl;? a ', 0)I XI:I01F IL'I[R ® (:.\1\1,1:N A. Pi "I r.RSEN, 0)I WILMDMIT ?. _,? 'T(WAI.F.MIT(AMENI n.\I)ArrIRMAHvl.:Ac 'no N I•.MI'LMIT"' Page 2 July 17, 2006 FLS2006-05033 3. Any future additions to the property be reviewed for compliance with the Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) of 0.65; 4. In the event construction of the top floor roof deck elevator is not provided, the tower shall comply with the maximum building height of 30 feet; 5. Provide a survey showing existing grades (spot elevations) on the subject site prior to the issuance of any building permit. Spot elevations should be in a grid format spaced every ten to twenty feet; 6. The pool deck shall not exceed 12 inches above existing grade; 7. No part of the structure(s) and/or landscaping shall be constructed within the right-of-way of Aster Place; 8.... Parked v6 icles shall not block City sidewalks per City Ordinance Section 30.041(1)(b); 9. A three foot landscape buffer shall be provided along the outside of the six foot tall fence along the reduced fronf'setback•from the Aster Place; 10. Show the-trees on the site plan prior to the issuance of any building permits; 11. Any improvements, such as adjacent lot grading, that impact the city street end north of this lot are to be reviewed by the City Engineer and approved by means of a city right-of-way permit. Private landscaping of the street end by the adjacent owner is strongly discouraged. This is because that in a stormwater event the street end can allow stormwater to runoff when the city storm pipe system is overloaded; and 12. All mechanical and pool equipment be screened from the public right-of-ways and adjacent properties per section 3-903.H.1. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above twelve conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the revised site plans dated received July 03, 2006, the revised application dated received July 17, 2006, and the revised building elevations dated received July 17, 2006. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (July 17, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodder, Planner H at (727) 5624547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler(cDmyclearwater.corr7. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director SAPlanning Department\C D B\Flex Standard (FLS)\Inactive or Finished Cases\Bay Esplanade 727 - Goeckl (LMDR) JVS\FLS2006-05033 Development Order.doe P_ '-I r 8_e? w ED p DOL SETBgCK ?, bt SEA WALL W _ •.*--- o ? •. , of ?. w i I I ? •,;yl, I 4 ? ? ,? ? .?5-.L ? X11 x ' •I. REQf1I,QED S TBACK?? ?- ? ? J ` DN. UP? r b; 411 ;Jl 1 ?.? ;? 1 Gil ? ?\\ ? ELEV. ? r r CLO E7 •? ?,I _ r htQUI?D SET qC / i-` ?f SET CK 1q, U ?. w N-o e 102 aJ cif > RI / co d o ? d o ?- r - t , ELEV. o X42'-06' MEDIAN ROOF LINE OF ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM ELEV_ ®+32'-09' TOP OF ROOF DECK ELEV_ ®+23'-9' TH RD LEVEL ELEV_ ' +12'-15' SECOND LEVEL ELEV_ o .II'-0' 5PE. ELEV o 0'-75' FINISHEpr LOOR ORIGINAL RECEIVED L 2 51006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RIGHT 511)E ELEVATION 5CALE 115" = 1' 00 i ' ' r r 1 ELEV_ m +42'-06' MEDIAN ROOF LINE OF ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM ELEV. A +32'-0'3'- TOP OF ROOF DECK ELEV. A +23'-9' THIRD LEVEL ELEV. o +12'-l5' SECOND LEVEL ELEV_ A +II'-0' BP-E_ ELEV. a 01-1.5' F N SHED FLOOD DIM ORIGINAL RECEIVED 2 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER EMi urvu l=Eml 10MR& 0 0 0 REAR ELEVATION 5GALE I/VII = 1' 00 3 1' ELEV. ® +42'-06' MEDIAN ROOF LINE OF ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT Zjt ELEV. m +32'-09' TOP OF ROOF DECK ELEV. a +23'-9' THIRD LEVEL ELEV. B +12'-T.5' SECOND LEVEL ELEV. o +11'-0' 5r-E. ELEV. ®0'-'I5' FMISHED FLOOR ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 2 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LEFT 511DE ELEVATION 5CALE 1/8" = 1' 00 rLIJKIUA JIAIUIt 01U11-b.UU9: (TVO SITE BENCHMARKS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION) THE LINES ON THIS SKETCH DD NDT STREET ADDRESS: 727 BAY ESPLANADE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 4 C ?f Q ?l lu >, )JJ 4 N-- - . i Ii ?j h 1.4 PROVIDED BY CLIENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION : !WOOD DOCK ti A 0% 0 `i 15 30 GRAPHIC SCALE f O ,Arg , &th6 PROVIDED BY CLIENT A CERTIFIED TO KEITH GLOECKI AMNET MORTGAGE INC. D/B/A AMERICA MORTGAGE NETWORK OF FLORIDA MAJESTIC TITLE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA LAND AMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY LOT 7, BLOCK 35, MANDALAY, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGES 32 THROUGH 35, INCLUSIVE, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. IQUALITY CONTROLLED BY RAFAEL MEDINA NOTE: IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER ON OR OFF LINES (APPROX. LOCATION ONLY) FOUNDATION/UTILITIES DISCLAIMER NOTE: FOUNDATION BENEATH THE SURFACE OF THE"GROUND HAS NOT BEEN LOCATED. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED. SIGNATURE DATE : 1/12106 NOTE1 FEMA FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING: THIS DATE PRODUCT WAS NOT DESIGNED TO.MAKC PRECISE IN/ OUT FLOOD RISK DETERMINATIONS THIS PRODUCT IS NOT SUITABLE FOR ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS AND CANNOT BE USED TO DETERMINE ABSOLUTE DELINEATIONS OF FLOOD BOUNDARIES. CALL 1-877-FEMA MAP OR EMAIL A MAP SPECIALIST AT WVV.FEMA.ORG/MIT/TSD/FQ-MAPIZHTM CERTIFICATION : CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT IT MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 61G17-6. FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027. FLORIDA STATUTES. FIELD SURVEY DATE : __ 1111106 BY SIGNATURE DATE 1119106 CONSTITUTE OWNERSHIP. ASTER PLACE (PLAT) 6t UNIMPROVED (FIELD) ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 2 5 2000 PLANNING DEPART NT CITY OF CLEARWA W E SCALE 1' = 30' PROVIDED BY COUNTY FLOOD ZONE. 125096-0102G COMMUNITY PANEL 125096 ARE DATED9-3-03 (FLOOD ZONE. Er, -C', -D-, & -)r NOT DESIGNATED-FLOOD HAZARD ZONE AREA) NOTEo PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLDUD ZONE DETERMINATION FROM OUR LDCAL PERMITING, PLAWNING, AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. NOTE, IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. 61G17-6.0031 (5) (E) (IF LOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RECORD, OTHER THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT, IS REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 0r?du, ? ue 0wr arw Drat 0 06EV : W' i W' bL a4^cg+'S?i?ne+r.x FRONT ELEVATION WALE 1/8' =1'00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 17 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1EVATIONS May 30, M06 ML'TROIARCHITECTS R16M SIDE ELEVATION SCALE 1/8' =1' 00 REAR ELEVATION SCALE I/e' =1' 00 LEFT 51DE ELEVATION SCALE 1/8' :1' 00 GLOECKL RESIDENCE A&T 10e.17 (1?1) 111' (F) )(? PROPOSED SETBACK 5' 6' AIGN ALUMINUM FENCE WI GATE - I I I g l a AR6 AND GRILU o I I o I I HOT TU6 a I I TWO CAR GAR46E'?? ?i ?•"'-- ?17_IP i! rn N I I STOR4GE 1\ I I ` NEW GCNCRETE DRIVE I SMIEED PAPER STREET 5ETBACK 25 POOL I 11 m I ?n 00 PORG N?? I I? I ENTRY WTER I % \ / -44 ? I STORAGE ? PPOGH DECK I / n P? 00 PROP05ED SETBACK 5' N,O` 622'?,`W- 10E32' (1*-I) 111' (F) 83LVMbtl313 ipMo 1N3MVd3a `MNNNM 51 TE FLAN soot 9 0 Nnr &ca le 1:50 May 30, 2006 iA. ARCHITECTS GLOEC 03/113,,,j:jcj KL RESIDENCE MAP OF TIRE LOCATION AND BOUNDARY SURVEY FCM STREET ADDRESS: SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST 4'X4' LOT 1 727 BAY ESPLANADE NO ID NV COR BLOCK 36 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ko FOLIO# 54666/036/0020 FOLIO# 546 66103610010 i - q Q 1 i k r N b. W i tU 111'(P) 1 10 ?p O i L, Rs S I O ROW ! ? P D£ I ONr ST a ! `' WWIn I Y C R HA E, i 8FA o ASTER ST (FLD) I N ° ASTER PLACE (P) ti o oR i O ^ 60' ROW (UNIMPROVED) R OR I _ =I ?O I SCALE 1 n = 30' i ? i le p E R I,yF SITE LOCATION L.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.J 6" I 412' ---- ?IE?M -- - F(X) ?,NO ID ? WC \ X r - -- X4'-- 23.7--)--? - H GE L r ---- . Z-- 6'------ 1E 2 I --- - i i Ll R W- I--- NO ID _ . 1 - 2 7' N 61 _ . 4c ' !aE 9l 36.6' . ROW , 30'CP) 61 CON 4. 35.11' FCIR 518; LSB# 2129 . Oki ~ BELL 5.0' \\ JOI?LR \ \ III Q'_ 4k N ti= (4 N WD v PLSN 3747 k 53 \ \ 5/ Jy -^ \ \ \ \ \ 0070 S M ? 36 9' OT 10 t INGLE STORY (1 61 RESIDENCE LOT '7 \m ?' J ti BLOCK 35 `? . v x 8 u 150 ?Ob WOOD 3.3 ?` J DOCK m 5.3' 50.0' \ A 'V / i y ???? 0 10.3' \ rr ?31? b Ri VIT POL CTYP) 1 • 3 -0OAT \0 /i' / ... `0? ti tK CON > o? u l LIFT N w ? a / I S 9. -:•.. r : NI2,B' \ 10 f LI' 240' 4? 1' 12'1 i 22,9' ~ CA QVi - W I / -------------- - T 54'X18' H E D 6 E 5.3' - - - - - - - - - I 7 L / L3 i 3'WF r S ( ) ? _ 20,2' ,. /2 FIR IV<? ? - NO F X ? 6'I NO ID W 0? e 8.4' FOL IO# 54666103510060 (Lj < 3 '? lt ) 3 -? LOT 6 I j e W P LOT 11 I o I? Q 4 BLOCK 26 I C.) R! FCM 373' = h T? O M f< 3 ti NO ID 00'(M/WC) ' 6 ' ti W • e N W 105. 00 40 S88 0.39 W 7 00 A S88'40'00'W 110.86'lM) LINE TABLE F(X) NO ID h j 111'(P) WC i L1 N88'18'3 ' ' o W ; N 8 E 105.08 (M/WC) N88'18'38 'E 1 ti 111100 (M) ;u o C-j e 1111(P) LOT 5 a L2 S07'18'32'W ' a o FOLIO# 54666103510050 59,00 (M) ' ' ' ' L3 S88 57 19 61 105.50 (M/WC) LOT 12 S88'57'19'W 111.001(M) 111'(P) rn 111 `CP) I L4 N07'53'58'E 57,89'(M) 58'(P) L5 S07042'16'W 591131(M) 58'(P) I ' ' ' ' L6 N07 23 16 E 145,48 (M) 0 a N07'00'00 E 145,72'(D) ti 3 0° LOT 4 ?o Z O - Z L7 N07'26 20'E 176.12'(M) „ 0 < m 0 174,0'(P) v m0 I v co C7 m N > _ FIR 112' v 111'(P) 1 NO ID C" Z f WE LEGEND ? DIAMETER = 1PALM TREE 1 I CERTIFIED TO: \ DRIP LINE KEITH GLOECKL _ PERIMETER FCM NO ID 4(X4' LEGAL DESCRIPTI ON: SE CUR NO ID LOT 7, BLOCK 35, MANDALAY, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR LOT 2 ' ' LOT cOR LO 1 PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 14, PAGES 32 - (P) 59,8 (M) BLOCK 27 60 35, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ©- RECLAIM WATER VALVE ?- FPC BOX ®= W8 Q- GTE RISER CATV A - UGP X - PP LEGENDS & SYMBOLS LP = CP (- = GUY ANCHOR + = FIRE HYDRANT "-WATER VALVE O -MANHOLE ® -IRRIGATION BOX AC - AIR CONDITIONER CI - CURB INLET AL - ALUMINUM CLF - CHAIN LINK FENCE EP - EDGE OF PAVEMENT FCIP - FOUND CAPPED IRON PIPE FPIP = FOUND PINCH IRON PIPE PC - POINT OF CURVATURE FRRS - FOUND RAIL ROAD SPIKE PCED - PINELLAS COUNTY (REC) - RECORD UE - UTILITY EASEMENT REF -REFERENCED W - WOOD ASPH - ASPHALT CO- CLEANOUT BM - BENCH MARK CONC - CONCRETE FUR - FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD F(X) - FOUND -X- CUT 'ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FCM - FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT GC - GRANITE CURB PCP - PERMANENT CONTROL POINT ROW - RIGHT-OF-WAY WB - WATER BOX SA - SANITARY WC - WITNESS CORNER BRWF - BRICK WALL FENCE COR. - CORNER BWF - BARB WIRE FENCE CP - CONCRETE POLE FDH -FOUND DRILL HOLE FIR - FOUND IRON ROD HWF - HOG WARE FENCE PG - PAGE LP - LIGHT POLE PI - POINT OF INTERSECTION SEC. TWP. RNG - SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE WD - WOOD DECK SUR 5/8-- SET CAP IRON ROD LB /7101 WF - WOOD FENCE (C) - CALCULATE CS - CONC STEPS ; COVERED AREA CSW - CONCRETE SIDE WALK CA FIP - FOUND IRON PIPE (FLD) = FIELD (M)= MEASURED POB - POINT OF BEGINNING MTL = METAL POC - POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SCR -SCREENED WPP -WOOD POWER POLE SH - SHED WS - WOOD STEPS T CAN - CABLE TV BOX CW - CONCRETE WALL CB - CATCH BASIN (D)- DEED FN - FOUND NAIL FND =.FOUND 0/A - OVERALL POL - POINT ON LINE OHP - OVER HEAD POWER PP - POWER POLE SPKND - SET PK NAIL AND DISC LB. /7101 WW - WANG WALL ST - STORM UGP - UNDERGROUND POWER CC - CONC CURB DE - DRAINAGE EASEMENT FN/ID = FOUND NAIL & DISC OR. BK. - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK PRC- POINT OF REVERSE CURVE STOP - STRADDLE POINTS V - VINYL CCR - CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD DISC - DISK FPC - FLORIDA 'POWER CORP. PAD 0/S - OFFSET PRM -PERMANENT REFERENCE MARKER (TM) . TAX MAP VF - VINYL FENCE CE - COVERED ENTRANCE ENCL - ENCLOSURE CG - CURB AND GUTTER EOW - EDGE OF WATER FPKN-FOUND PK NAIL FPKND-FOUND PKNAIL & DISC (P) - PLAT PT -POINT OF TANGENT PB - PLAT BOOK PVR - PAVERS TOB - TOP OF BANK VG - VALLEY GUTTER TOE - BOTTOM OF SLOPE S URVEYORS NOTES: SEE LEGEND WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A R AND/OR EASEMENT OR R T- G FI -W FURN THE DT S SY I N U H I AY WERE SHE O UNDERSIGNED, UNLES RWISE SHOWN HEREON. NO UNDERGROUND FOUNDATIIONS STR CTU ES, INSTALLATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN OTH O LOCATED UNLESS- OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREON THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE ND ORIGINAL . THIS SUR•VQY"" 6lvACKt#FOR 0 DAYS. A RAISED SEAL O F A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. CERTI , AI SQN: A, I HER A4E?RTJFa-t19A4.U1A6(1RO1j Y MAP WAS M ADE UNDER MY DIRECTION FLOOD ZONE: "AE" (EL.11') COMMUNITY PANEL AYUSO SURVEYING INC , , 04 ?1? Q? ? TNA4 CHIEVES THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL ?T 4(,.• No. 125096-01026 , . PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS & MAPPERS LB #7101 ST 1 RDS THE B AP ?0fYROF,ESSIONAL L INx IM 61G17-6,, IN I7?$L*NT?1.0 FLORIDA SECT N? AND SURVEYORS AND MAPP ADMINISTRATION CODE, ERS DATED: 09-03-03 INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON BY NO MEANS REPRESENT A DETERMINATION ON WHETHER 3851 82ND AVENUE NORTH SUITE J PINELLAS PARK, FLORIDA 33781 ° B PROPERTIES WILL DR WILL NOT FLOOD. 727-528-2399 OR 528-1839, FAX 727-528-2038 Yr ??"' • 'Z' ATE SIGN: 05_22_2006 - LAND WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THIS PLAT MAY OR MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO E-MAIL AYUSOSURVEYINGOYAHOO.COM _ R6?I: A? rA O Q J" $ 955 F REVI TE SIONS D ? , A , LOODING. A : FILE i0`6fl0 s$lJRc1EY,?FIELD DATE: 05-18-06 CHECK BY: EAA DRAWN BY: PYW FIELD CREW: JC/AT ~a3~ ~F ti r~ a , I , . L s k~..:'~.4r i~ tiG h~ I,. `gg~~yc~c~'rl~:.:. rd? r.... I I 6~~A 5~ i ff I I ~4A'1'~il I C I ' ~ 4 ~I I 6 ~ I I ~ l Ili II 64b r 1 ~ "Y~~ ~ I Ftw~~ ~ L C err, ? zklurCl F 1411Wrir~"[~r4h ~ ~ i ~"~~~Y I ` I ,r i t r'. 1 r',', I ~ ~i4 ~ . 1 rF al;', ~k, 'I.. 'v~L1"u`~v~yo 1 lk.~ a G„~.9,1 ? ~~i Ptl. 1 r~'j~A~ dy~ k i4 ~ Ni r~. R1 iUt ~i R~ri i~Q is t : ' r li i it ,hCt~.,, , ~'a IirC inl~ ~~b ~N~I'~:li}lir Mil Ir~it~ir ~p 154~~k s~ r h~l i ri~Ill it lal ~Ci iC~~ Gi.i ~~liyii~ pyq ~ av~ r ,tGritiS n:~. ? A L ~~rly li m.r 4' yC t r~ .s ' '„nEt lip., r~urrra~a~8a c r r v a iti. t tNU II r r':~C t r. S', y 3,? FC. N i ~ ~ i tgt i~pC y,C9 : ir, 1, ~f ri h~t~ 4i k~115 ~~N~611Is.. ~ a.- ~~lry ~l ~w~~~.~~ 5, i' ~l„F'~''' I I 'i ~ ~ nx k. ^ ~ ~\~`~s ~ ~ ~i i~,, il'h~ 1i~~~rl CN41~ Iii I hly ~~~~1 fr i ~yh i it ~ ~ i ~a'+i G r I ;rliji~+'i,.?:5`r'?~~~~i i i Ur~ yr~P~4 5 l IJ 16t ki E 'IiN ICk"~"[a\ 6 yh lkPr rti~~l~~is4y~:~,ili~o~~6 ~a. C ~ t„ ~ ~ Ala ~ ~ a~ ~ ~e~ "yvS~~ ~ a r. ~g ' b ~F y HHk~ryq iu~~~~ l'r11~ i'~~`yY* ~ " i., i t~ a tit litre . ~ Ca+~~lh~!,'t . ~ way yt ° ~ ~ n .'~V'a,,r as v` i 3 , ~ , al, t y r L r w 4~h5u S'd''~ ~ ~ yZyik l~Y'11. :.4t ~~~^a>`~ ~ ya ~ ~ rti' ~ ~";u,r\VA~~ `w~`.~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~ Ci~. ~ ~,~'l v'11~ ~r ~ e `tE~eu~~ ? A ~ ~ ~ .„`a e > It y..;,E. ~~1~ c ~ f „ ~ a w~~~~~~..A.t I' ` 4.. ~ :~:1, r ` ~ tit 4tir~~~~tl~atiC ~,~C~4ur"~tetlsti~~~d':~4i`e`~,4~~: r"a"~,`~y yh e tt° T : ~ ~ ti '..'a n ~'1~~"ti ~ ~4 'Cr ~ ' p y ~ "~i~~~ CB bur ~ ~y, . u, a '1 ~ ti ~~l~n~rgr~ r' arm ''I ar~ gr6 ~~8ar. ali cl yL Go ~utvA ~ ,i i,.. ~ a ~ w 61:~,. T'r a S~srr E ~~i, w a 4~' ~F~1~~~~~a r:.x ~~Va a G ~ ~ y, i ti, t~ .I. ~ ~y: !4c~ '~~~\~'r C'Y ~ tizC.>la F r,r 5 ~4 _ k 4iv I~ a h~ ~ df. ~ t ~ v h 6EL5~V ~y ~ ~~w~Ly ~4 ~~k~ ~ ~ C\y:: i ~ ~ we ~ `v', ~ .~1~ L~ ~ s~~ 1m~~' t 6 \ ~iF. ~~~~rv iy}~ ~~I, t ~ ~ '''"9.~a ~ ~\t.~ c , ~ L, M1' ~ S. ~ ~L7., ~t eF is t41.:. ~ .y.'. ~ a, ~ i N ..i ~ T ti ~ ~ ii ~„'F 4 rah L,yF 5:. r~C"~a ~ fi ~ l l MiY ~r~~i i~.. ~t~o FLl ~Gyt6~ekF B , ~ ro~6~ y a~ "11 ~ L. ' h 5 5 ~ I'' SS t o ` ` . ~ ~ ~~,L ~iP ~S G~SaL ~ Z L v. l :r.. r ~ `i °jtiti¢ 5 i ti~~i r ryh.uu .,.r ~ 2C ' _I r i,,. ~ ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~~4~G~~~t~.~~.,~. c ~ " / l~ ~ar 4~~C ~~tP~Slx ~h'iiCC ~ Y~ Ra r t a, ~ ~y1 i~ r ~;'Lt~ ~~r~ , ~~e\~Ehti~E' ~ ~r ~a~N ti4a a ~ yery`ti'~irA~E~ti ~E ~kr~wr rA~p~ ti ~~v~ kw~y~L~ tt Es ~r~ti,ti~~~ ~ ~ a d ~~~CES~A~~:L~Z ~h~ s k~~a`~~~' E~ i ry _ , ~l ~ ~ . ~`F<CES~``~~ ~1 b tti z r~ ~~s~4~~.~~~~ i W ~L~ .r. ~ ii; ~ti 4~.y ~~F'ti50~,rC}~u ~ , y~?~~ 1~5,0,~t ~ I ~~~t~L ~ I ' ti~ ~~~a, S~6 ' ~ $ .I i . ~ ~,~~~~iy. ~~~~~E ~d i.. .i , idi~ Moore classic colors 199. Barel over Lard s Color Ben amen i ~RONfi ~~~VA~ION r ~ieu~ I-7~ ~ir<en u~hite over-lard trim trim color Ben amen Moore color e J,. R0~ DECK u i Scale 11~ = 100 for Stucco exterior Color Ben amen Moore I - _ , 0 0 5 A _ - - - , _ O ~ MA57ER 8ED MA57~R ~ , E3):D ~ . 51 ~ ROOM ROOM l...i ~ o A V DMING bIttINC~ AREA. I ~4 0 KI1C.4~N A ~~,I~ , a ail Q DENF BED FAl"11LY D V M 5. R~ MA9'I~R ROOD FLAN ~ Q / ~ ~ CCO~ ~ CGO. ® + 1 ® O 6ED ~ owe Nb G OOM ono ~ p ra Q ~L. i;~ ~ a 3 f CI,IICt \ ~ ~ 00 ~ b C T+~ ~ o ~iILITIEB. SCALD 118' =1' ~ BED ROOM 1NEA'fRE - 1 C1.0. i~ r~il~ ~Loo~ S~CONq 1=1.OOR X11251 ~~OOR SCALD ll8° = I' >D~ Up ~ ~ SCA~~ 118 =100 ' ' SCA~1_ IIS =10>a ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUN U 5 2006 PIANNING DEPARTMEN'P ~~~I~~ CINOFCLEARWATER may :iV.1W6 GLOECKL RESIDENCE h/lETRO ARCHITECTS