Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2006-06041
?If LD a60 6-0 60)q ? Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1, 2 0 5 0 0 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINAL RECEIVED QV 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Mark N. Tezaris, Owner APPLICANT NAME: Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 4965 W. Breeze Circle, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (347) 683-6715 FAX NUMBER: (718) 408-3276 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Mark N. Tezaris List ALL owners on the deed Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC AGENT NAME: Frank C. Schlotter, P . E . _ MAILING ADDRESS: 6885 Copperfield Drive, New Port Richey, FL 34655-5603 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 372-9256 FAX NUMBER: (727) 372-4586 CELL NUMBER: (727) 992-01 50 E-MAIL ADDRESS: schlotter0l@msn.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Gardens Condo PROJECT VALUATION: $ 9,000.000 STREET ADDRESS 601 =North Fort Harrisbh Avenue PARCEL NUMBER(S): 09129/15/60120/000/0010 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.652 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 2 8 , 4 8 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel I, Lot-J, Nicholson ..& Sloan S/D, P.B. 1, Page 38 -Parcel II Lots 19 & 20, Bidwells Oakwood Addition to . PROPOSED USE(S): earwa er, g 1 R rnnrlominium__Unit_s.__ (reside_n_tiai _-- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Redevelop -existing_ car wash to luxury condominiums ._......._._- -- Specificallyidentify the request Request flexibility of maximum allowable density=from (include number of units or square --- -- -- footage of non-residential use and all 16 to 18--units by participation in a street scape requested code deviations; e.g. program. Request f lexibily t of landscape plan and reduction in required number of --_-_?--- - --- ------ ---- -- -- -------- -- - ------ --- ---- - .-. parking spaces, specific use, etc.) buffering requirements, (See Attachment). S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 1 of 8 ?d K iv:+i i vi ,W RECEIVED 2 8 2006 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), AWMAKWAKED PLANNED UN DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES_ NO_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ?I SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) (See Attachment) Of Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. CGC will be in harmonv with the Old Bav Di Optimum density can be achieved with flexible standards, white minimizingI FAR coverage. CGC will be a catalyst for neighboring properties redevel- ment, (adjoining old apartment building and boat repair yard). 2. The proposed deve opment will' not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Clearwater Gardens Luxury Condominiums will greatly improve the value of existing neighboring properties and encourage like redevelopment - consistent with the Old Bay District plan. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. CGC will provide a safe and secure environment for residents and not create a source of uncontrolled pollution. Expanding the tax base will provide additional financial resources to support public health services 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. CGC will provide off-street parking for 2 spaces per unit plus 2 H/C spaces and allows ample room to pull-off out of the roadway and into the property. CGC is close to downtown Clearwater and therefore pedestrian friendly 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development CGC character is mediterranean architectural style and is consistent with neighboring redevelopemnt projects such as Scientology buildings, proposed Island View, Harrison Village and others in.the vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Landscaping and building textures will soften adverse acoustic impacts. CGC will be attractive, inviting, appealing and desirable to residents and neighbors An enclosed dumpster will be provided, emptied and sanitized twice weekly for garbage collection and disposal. S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 2 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 8 2006 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X1 Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: (See Attachment) 1.. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Flexibility with landscape buffering and density requirements will allow achievement of optimal economic feasibility, while adhering to building setback lines and maximum height limitations. Streetscaping is offered as compensation for above mentioned flexibility. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district CGC proposed redevelopment is consistent with the Old Bay District plan and meets criteria for permitted uses, zoning and density standards. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. CGC proposed use of residential luxury condominiums is consistent with neighborhood land uses and will comment and support other uses, such as retail and professional and will not impede orderly redevelopmen 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development CGC will immediately help to upgrade the neighborhood in terms of desirability and property market values. CGC will not be a detriment to any adjoining properties to the best of our knowledge. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following iectives: 0 The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; t? The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. CGC fits-in perfectly with the Old Bay District and the City of Clearwater's redevelopment plans and is consistent with permitted land uses, zoning and redevelopment standards. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: Changes in horizontal building planes; Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; Variety in materials, colors and textures; Distinctive fenestration patterns; Building stepbacks; and X Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The mediterranean architectural style of CGC will enhance the character of the neighborhood, increase community pride and provide luxury homes S:\Planning DepartmenhApplication Forms\development review\2006 Form s\Com prehensive Infill Project (FLD) LOUb.ul MC Page 3 of 8 0WIC Irk RECENED K9V 2 8 2006 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Manual and 4-202.A.21) ign Criteria A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Stone Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property Ones; W" - Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; Q0/ All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; / A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. tPJ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, floe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor s!- elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) V SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies: 4-111, TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; Id' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY: ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards tie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Form s\Com prehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 4of8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 8 2006 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) PLANNING DEPARTMENT (See Attached Site and Architectural Plans) CITY OF CLEARWATER SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; ------------ _ North arrow, Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; ^ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures: _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements, Location of all street rights-0f--way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stone-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED _ Land area in square feet and acres; Number.of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement _ Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. W REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11); 0 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\zuuo 5 of 8 rvn z)x\av mpiv iG' J Page '?y __, H. LANDSCAPING PLAN. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ORIGINAL (See Attached Landscape Plans) RECEIVED LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; JV 2 8 2006 _ Names of abutting streets; PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; CITY OF CLEARWATER Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers, _ Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing, Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names: Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %I X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) (See Attached Architectural Plans) W BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 % X 111- J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) (See Attached Architectural Plans) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development revievA2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 6 of 8 9 ORIGINAL i RECEIVED NOV 2 s 200 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWyATER El Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. D1 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. 48? Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. X) Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): X4&7- Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative Mark N. Tezaris, Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 0 9 day of November A.D. 20_Q(_ to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as identification. Notary public, My commission expires: S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 7 of 8 • • e)DlrlKlA1 RECEIVED N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: NOV 2 8 2006 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ Mark N. Tzaris, Owner _..--_ IN- Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC 2. That (I amtwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following descri 601 North Fort Harrison Avenue property (address or general location): bed 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe r Redevelopment Permit equest) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Frank C. Schlotter, P.E. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary t such petition; affect o 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to der and act on the above described property; p 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application this application and the owner authorizes City rocess ; 7. That (lAove), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true an correct. d Property Owner Property Owner Mark N. Tezaris Property Owner Property Owner FLOR STATE OF COUNTY OF PINEL IDA, LAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the Sta Florida, on this 9 th day of te of Nov. 2006 personally appeared Mark N. r i s who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that hetshe fully understands the contents of the affidavit tha he signed. t Notary Public Signature Com Notary Seal/Stamp My mission Expires: S:\Planning Department\Application Form s\developm ent review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 8 of 8 Pinellas County Property *aiser Information: 09 29 15 60120 00000 ORIGINALPage 2 of 4 RECEIVED ?9v 2 s 2006 09 I 29 15 / 60120 0 0 0/ PASI&AEPa_ RTMENT ZO-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:OZ:54 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TEZARIS & BIEBER AQUISITIONS LLC OBK: 14943 OPG: 0316 4965 W BREEZE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34663 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as : 601 N FT HARRISON AUE of Jan 1, 2006, based on act: 261.08 E sales from 2003 - 2104: OR Book/Page Price(Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp SaleDate 0 Plat Information 2 12,006 14,943/ 316 9501000 (Q) I 1912: Book 001 Pgs 038- 11/2,004 13,946/1,881 400,000 (U) I ) I ( 0000: Book Pgs - U 12/2,003 13,299/ 627 250,000 06 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 9 /1,998 10,230/1,648 220,0 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 251,400 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: Z51,400 Institutional Exem: 10 Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 251,400 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land ice Units Meth P r Front x Depth 05 Taxes: 5,841.83 1) 17,2 x 167 6.00 29, 053.00 S Special Tax • 00 00 00 3) 0 x 0 . . Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 5, 841.83 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 5,841.83 Short Legal NICHOLSON & SLOAN'S ADD LOT i AND BIDWELL'S OAK nescrintion WOOD ADD LOTS 19 & 20 Building Information h".//nnn rn ninellas_fl.us/htbin/cP_i-sCr3?o=1&a=1&b=1&r-&s=1&u=o&p=09+29+15+... 04/20/2006 ORIGINAL Pinellas County Property Agaiser Information: 09 29 15 60120 00000 RECENMge 3 of 4 Kov 2 s 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ProQertv and Land Use Code descriptions I F CLEARWATER 09 / 29 / 19 1 60120 / 000 / 008 :01 20-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:02:54 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Service Garage Property Address: 601 N FT HARRISON AVE Prop Use: 345 Land Use: 27 S-truc-tural E1OM403Rts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Nasonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Bar 3oist/Rigid Fram Roof Cover Built up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,838 7) .00 0 0 2) Canopy .20 403 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 4) .00 0 10) .00 O 5) .00 0 11} .01 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Fea-turgs Description Dimensions 1) ASPHALT 10880 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Price Units Value RCD 1.75 101080 17,640 17,640 .00 0 0 0 .08 0 0 0 .00 O 0 0 .06 0 0 e .00 0 0 e TOTAL RECORD VALUE: Year 999 0 0 e e e 17,640 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Fair Year Built 1,988 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation O httn•//nnn rn ninellas.fl.us/hthin/cai-scr3?o=1&a=1&b=1&r=&s=1&u=O&p=09+29+15+... 04/20/2006 Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-5624865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ is CASE M RECEIVED RECEIVED BY (staff initials).: 2 8 DATE RECEIVED: N0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL TWO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 03/27/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Mark N. Tezaris, Owner APPLICANT NAME: Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 4965 W. Breeze Circle, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (347) 683-6715 FAX NUMBER: (718) 408-3276 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Mark N. Tezaris, Owner List ALL owners on the deed Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC AGENT NAME: Frank C. Schlotter, P.E. MAILING ADDRESS: 6885 Copperfield Drive, New Port Richey, FL 34655-5603 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 372-9256 FAX NUMBER: (727) 372-4586 CELL NUMBER: (727) 992-01 50 E-MAILADDRESS: schlotterO1 @msn.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Gardens PROJECT VALUATION: $ 9,000,000 STREET ADDRESS: 601 N. Fort Harrison Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 09/29/15/60120/000/0010 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.652 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): _ 2 8, 4 8 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel I, Lot 1, Nicholson & Sloan S/D, P B 1, Page 38 Parcel II, Lots 19 & 20, Bidwells Oakwood Add., P.B. 1 HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? Two HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? 0 IS THERE A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES NO X IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: C:IMNDOMITEMPOR-11CONTENT.iE51ADAXY5Y51PLOlk Amenities Incentive Pool Use goplication 2006.doc Page 1 of 2 0 0 PROVIDE A C LETE DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENITIES PROPOSED TO BE PROVIDED (attach drawings, photographs, etc. as applicable): 1) Sidewalk pavers in front of property on North Fort Harrison_to_match patterns _chosen._.by..the_City_of Clearwater. _--Pavers-will ..continue on the entrance Driveway.-.. 2). One or more park-type benches on sidewalk in front of property, along with trash cans and lighting „ 3), Landscaping, (see landscapin_ plan), including Medjool Palms. 4) .Any.. other reasonable requests by.the_._City--Of_-Clearwater. Also.-refer to Site Plan Sheet.C2.1, for proposed amenities. C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative Mark N. Tezaris, Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 0 9 day of November AD. 20_D fi_ to me and/or by , who is personally known has produced Driver's License as identification Notary public, My commission expires: ORIGINAL RECEIVED KOV 2 81006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEp C:IIMNDO"S TEMPOR-11CONTENT 1E51ADAXY5Y51PU6lic Amenities Incentive Pool Use Applicatron 2006.doc Page 2 of 2 • 0 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ADDENDUM 28NOV06 FLD2006-06041 601 North Fort Harrison Avenue Page 1 Item B - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Response: We are requesting to redevelop the existing car wash to luxury condominiums similar in quality to the Bay view Condominiums, Antigua Bay Yacht Club and the Island View. We are also requesting to increase the density from 16 units to 18 by participation in the Public Amenities Incentives program. We have moved the wrought iron fence back from the side walk several feet and will create a pedestrian friendly side walk and sitting area. We will pave the side walk and driveway in front of the lot with approved pavers. In the sitting area we will also add two street benches, lighting, a garbage can and tree shading, (Medjool Palms) the to encourage pedestrian activity and a dynamic street life. We are also requesting flexibility in the landscaping plan and buffering requirements. Page 2 Item D - D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) 0 Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Response: This project is at the beginning phase of the redevelopment of the Old Bay District on North Ft. Harrison's west side and there are not many new developments adjacent to or near by to use for comparison. The proposed redevelopment will be closer in harmony with the scale and bulk of the adjacent property on the south side. This property is a three story multifamily. Clearwater Gardens will be a four story building within the 40 feet in height limitation. The fourth floor is required in order to build enough units with enough square footage to financially cost-justify the project's risk/reward ratios. With less than 18 units and a slowing condo market this project cannot be viable. Adjacent on the north side is a boat yard which is inconsistent with the Old Bay plan and not directly comparable to the planned Clearwater Gardens Luxury condominiums. OECE? R ?pV ?8 2006 rnEN? N`NG pEPPRwOR 0 0 4 Generally speaking, coverage is encouraged in the overall downtown redevelopment plan to create a "critical mass of activity". Clearwater Gardens will balance the coverage of the lot space with a friendly pedestrian sitting area in front of the lot and with lush landscaping in the front and back of the lot. This coverage will be a much better balance than the adjacent three story old multifamily on the south side and the adjacent boat yard on the north side. Again, this project is at the beginning phase of the redevelopment of the Old Bay District on North Ft. Harrison's west side and there are not many new developments adjacent to or near by to use for comparison. "A variety of densities and housing styles are encouraged throughout the Old Bay District" as per the Clearwater Down Town Redevelopment plan. The density of the adjacent three story old multifamily on the south side seems consistent with the 18 units planned for Clearwater Gardens. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Response: Clearwater Gardens will develop new luxury condominiums that will be selling for about $300 a square foot. Once sold, these comparables will serve as input into the best use of the land calculations for the adjacent old multifamily on the south side and the boat yard on the north side. The success of this project will encourage the adjacent owners to ultimately look for a better return on their money. This can ultimately mean selling to a developer or redeveloping the property themselves consistent with the Old Bay District Plan. 3. The proposed development will not adversely effect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Response: Clearwater Gardens will replace the current car wash business which uses cleaning chemicals and generates a lot of traffic in and out with a luxury residential development. This will provide a safer, more secure and healthier environment for the current residents and expand the tax base to further support public health services. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Response: We will minimize traffic congestion by first replacing the busy 24X7 car wash with 18 luxury condominiums which will have a fraction of the current traffic. Second, we will provide off-street parking for 2 spaces per unit plus 2 Handicap spaces. We will also allow ample room to pull off the road and into the property. ORIGINAL RECENED ???? 2 8 2005 pIANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The current character of the vicinity is residential with a mix of land uses including residential and commercial uses which are surrounded by non-conforming vehicle services such as the current car wash on this site and the adjacent boat repair yard on the north side. The existing vehicle services results in incompatible development patterns and uses based on the Downtown Redevelopment plan's vision for this district. The proposed residential condominiums, and street-scaping conform to and are much more in-sync with the intended character and vision for this district. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Response: The new attractive, luxury residential development will significantly be more visually pleasing to the eye, have much less noise from loud music by people blasting their music while cleaning their cars, not have rotting fish tossed out by people cleaning their fishing boats on the site, and will not have the current 24X7 hours of operation of the busy car/boat wash on the site. Overall the new residential development will be a major improvement over the car-wash business on this site. The dumpster location was determined in cooperation with the solid waste department and is situated at their preferred site for best access. The dumpster construction is in accordance with coity specifications, except that the rear wall has been raised two (2) feet to eight (8) feet to provide additional buffering to the neighboring property. The under-building drive-thru clearance is fifteen (15) feet and is shown on the architectural plans. Page 3. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive In-fill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ? Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE IN-FILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Response: Flexibility with landscape buffering and density requirements will allow achievement of optimal economic feasibility, while adhering to building set-back lines and maximum height limitations. Street-soaping is offered as public amenities compensation for above mentioned flexibility and allowing additional density of two (2) units. ORIGINAL RECEIVED N"V 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Response: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS 1. GOAL - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL CONTINUE TO PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES AND SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND ENSURE THAT THESE RESOURCES ARE SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATED INTO THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT THROUGH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS, AND COORDINATION WITH FUTURE LAND USE INTENSITIES AND CATEGORIES. This residential project is not an environmentally sensitive property. It has no wetlands, beach dunes, sensitive soils, or other natural systems and therefore not prohibited to redevelopment. Further, this development does not have the potential to discharge toxic chemicals. This residential project is also in a Non-Evacuation zone and therefore does not complicate hurricane evacuation plans. 2. GOAL - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL UTILIZE INNOVATIVE AND FLEXIBLE PLANNING AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES, AND URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS IN ORDER TO PROTECT HISTORIC RESOURCES, ENSURE NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION, REDEVELOP BLIGHTED AREAS, AND ENCOURAGE INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Clearwater Gardens is located in the Old Bay District and has a clear priority for redevelopment. The city of Clearwater has promised development incentives, (Public Amenities) and an allowable higher density in exchange for public use street-soaping amenities. 3. GOAL - A SUFFICIENT VARIETY AND AMOUNT OF FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ACCOMMODATE PUBLIC DEMAND AND PROMOTE IN-FILL DEVELOPMENT. Clearwater Gardens complies with Future Land Use High Density Residential category specified in the Comprehensive plan. pRIG1%4L RECEIVE r J "'EO' PV'?'?NINr' pEP WATER av OF CLEAR 4. GOAL - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES MEET THE SAFETY, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND AESTHETIC NEEDS OF THE CITY THROUGH CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. Clearwater Gardens has created and submitted a landscaping plan and meets the City of Clearwater landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. 5. GOAL - THE CITY SHALL NOT PERMIT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR UNLESS AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE IS AVAILABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT. AREAS IN WHICH THE IMPACT OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EXCEED THE DESIRED LEVELS OF SERVICE WILL BE UPGRADED CONSISTENT WITH THE TARGET DATES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE APPLICABLE FUNCTIONAL PLAN ELEMENT. After meeting with the department heads of DRC, we have understood that the current, interim, and ultimately desired Levels of Service for traffic circulation, transit, water, sewer, garbage collection, and drainage systems are adequate to serve the planned new development of Clearwater Gardens. 6. GOAL -TO COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF NEW AND EXPANDED SCHOOL SITES AND FACILITIES IN ORDER TO ENSURE COMPATIBILITY AND CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Clearwater Gardens is a residential project and not an educational facility. Therefore, this goal does not apply directly. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT GOALS "The purpose of the Transportation Element is to plan for a multi-modal transportation system in Clearwater which includes public transit, bicycling, walking, air travel, rail facilities, vehicular traffic and parking facilities, establish inter-modal connections and support the Future Land Use Element." Therefore, the Goals within this element do not seem to apply directly to our project. ORIGINAL RECEIVED K, 9V 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS 16. GOAL - AN AFFORDABLE VARIETY OF STANDARD HOUSING UNITS IN DECENT AND SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS REGARDLESS OF RACE, NATIONALITY, AGE, MARITAL STATUS, HANDICAP, OR RELIGION. According to the Comprehensive Plan, "The population of the City of Clearwater is expected to grow to 112,830 permanent residents by the year 2010. To accommodate permanent and seasonal residents and maintain a healthy vacancy rate, approximately 2,500 new housing units will be needed. Large, vacant parcels of land are scarce in Clearwater. Because of this, infill development of small vacant lots and under-utilized parcels will be necessary, and should be encouraged, to provide for new households." The development of the current car wash to residential condominiums is consistent with these objectives and overall goal. UTILITIES ELEMENT GOALS The Goals within this element pertain to municipalities do not seem to apply directly to our project. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS The Goals within this element pertain to coastal properties and do not seem to apply directly to our project. CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS 25. GOAL - TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND TO ENHANCE NATURAL FEATURES WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO THE EXISTENCE OF THE NATURAL QUALITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF CLEARWATER'S SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENT. As per our last DRC meeting on August 3, 2006, we agreed that we would do two things with the Land Resources department. One was that we would replace the inches of trees removed, including the two Oak trees, and the second was that we financially contribute to a fund based on the inches removed. We also will calculate this amount and put the agreement in writing. This project will also comply with the one hundred (100) year floodplain requirements and standards of the Federal Emergency Management Agency of the Federal Flood Insurance Administration, and the City's building codes. ORIGINAL. RECENED ?ti??l 2 8 2006 PLANNING CITY OF CLLEARWA ER1 • • RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS Given the small lot size, we have agreed to pay the substantial impact fees to help reach these goals. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT GOALS The Goals within this element pertain to municipalities do not seem to apply directly to our project. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS The Goals within this element pertain to municipalities do not seem to apply directly to our project. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. Response: This luxury condominium redevelopment is one of the first to take place on North Fort Harrison in the Old Bay District that will also include the beautiful street-scaping outlined in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This will help the current value of the surrounding properties by proving a potentially better use for the land based on the comparable prices created by the sales of the new condominiums. This new value can only be realized to it's full extent by redevelopment of the old properties to new following the Goals and principles of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Response: The adjoining property on the south side is an old house converted to small apartments. This luxury condominium redevelopment next door will potentially make this property more valuable due to the beautiful new building replacing the unattractive busy noisy car wash next door. Additionally, the comparable prices created by the sales of the new condominiums can only help the value of the apartment house. The elimination of the cross-access has been worked out with the owner and property manager. They said that they can access the back if needed by the south side of the apartment building. Also, there is no proposed access filed at any time based on findings by the Papas Title Company. According to legal council, I am within my legal rights to move forward. ORIGINAL RECEIVED QV 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARYMEN CITY OF CLEARWATER • • Secondly, the adjoining property on the north side is a boat repair yard will not suffer any detriment from a beautiful new building replacing the unattractive busy noisy car wash next door. This can only help their property values for reasons mentioned above and may create additional demand for their services due to new resident moving in next door that may own boats. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; Response: This project is being submitted with a flexible development application as per agreement with Planning and Zoning. It is within the proposed future land use, is compatible with adjacent land uses and will fit in with the essential use chracterisitics of the neighborhood which include the south side adjacent multi-family, the Bay View, Antiqua Bay Yatch Club and other proposed projects in the immediate area. b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; Response: The proposed use of eighteen luxury condominiums will be a significant economic contributor and divetsify the local economy for the following reasons: • The construction will create construction and other jobs for about two years • The locally purchased construction materials will also add economically • The Clearwater tax base will be increase economically by the new residents downtown • The local shops and the services sector will also gain economically due added demand by the new residents c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; Response: The former unattractive busy, noisy 24X7 car wash which was part of the "Prohibited Uses Automobile service stations, all types of vehicle sales and services," listed in the Downtown Clearwater Re- development Plan concerning the Old Bay District will be replaced by a luxury residential development. These new residents will also be consumers of the local products and services and contribute to the tax base in a greater capacity than the former car wash did. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NON 2 8 2000 PLANNING DEPAR'rMH,4'1 CITY OF CLEARWAT'0 • 0 d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; Response: The proposed condominiums will be priced significantly lower than other new developments in the area such as the Antiqua Bay Yacht Club and the Island View with our prices starting at about $287.00 a square foot. e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or Response: Clearwater Gardens Condominiums fit-in perfectly with the Old Bay District and the City of Clearwater's redevelopment plans and is consistent with permitted land uses, zoning and redevelopment standards. f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Response: The subject property is not waterfront, therefore preservation of a working waterfront use is not applicable. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required set backs, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; Response: The site plan indicates that we are not building to the lot line but instead are building about five feet inside on the north and three feet inside of the south side property lines. This will make it easier for the adjacent properties to be developed and allow easier maintenance of building structures. The height is within the 40' limit. Additionally, we are adding the approved street-soaping in front of the property, which will ultimately tie in to the rest of the street-scaping as surrounding properties redevelop. The setback on the front is an average of thirty (30) feet and is consistent with the adjacent apartment building to the south (30 feet). The elimination of the cross-access to the property to the south has been resolved. A search by Pappas Title Company confirmed that the proposed easement on the original survey was never filed by the previous owner of the car wash or the owner of the adjacent south side property. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTNIEN' CITY OF CLEARWATER i' There are no garages in the back of the adjacent south side property. There is only a broken down shack. I spoke with the owner and his property manager and both said, "they did not need access to the back of the property through our property." They are ok with our proposed plan and hope that their property values will go up due to our development. Overall, this project will not impede but instead encourage normal and orderly redevelopment of the adjacent properties. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; Response: The proposed plans complies with the landscaping, fire, environmental, harbor master, legal, land resources, parks and recreation, storm water, solid waste, traffic engineering and planning guidelines based on on-going meetings with the respective departments. The Solid Wasted department has requested a clearance under the building of at least 14'. We are providing 15' height clearance under the building as per the drawings. The second request from Solid Waste was to put the dumpster at the location on the drawings. This was their first choice for a location given the requirements for the truck to get to the dumpster easily. They also gave us the specifications for the dumpster construction which we have used in our drawings details. The only thing in question is the required security gate at the entrance, which will only be closed at night and opened in the morning. This is important as a security selling point to new residents given the current crime in the immediate area. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; Response: This project is at the beginning phase of the redevelopment of the Old Bay District on North Ft. Harrison's west side and there are not many new developments adjacent to or near by to use for comparison. The proposed project's design has many similar characteristics in color, balcony design, overall building character to current buildings in the area including the Bay View, Antiqua Bay Yacht Club and the proposed Island View. The scale and intensity of this project is closer to that of the adjacent property on the south side. This property is a three story multifamily. Clearwater Gardens will be a four story building within the 40 feet in height limitation. Adjacent on the north side is a boat yard which is inconsistent with the Old Bay plan and not directly comparable to the planned Clearwater Gardens Luxury condominiums. The intensity of the adjacent three story old multifamily on the south side and other buildings in the area seems consistent with the 18 units planned for Clearwater Gardens. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTM041 CITY OF CLEARWAT`: R 9 • • d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes, This is done for each horizontal line for each floor including the roof in order beak up the base middle and top for a more visually stimulating appearance. • Use of architectural details such as columns cornices strinacourses pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings etc. : The architectural design, as per the artist drawings, include columns, cornices pilasters, balconies, railings and other architectural details. • Variety in materials. colors and textures: The building will have three color schemes and textures. One for each, the base, middle and top. • Distinctive fenestration patterns: We will be using high quality fenestration patterns for doors, windows and throughout the building that work well with the architectural designs of the area. • Building stepbacks, The average building stepback is about 30 feet and is consistent with the adjacent property to the south (30 feet). The average stepback condition is due to the shape of the front of the property, the northern side stepback is ten (10) feet and the southern side stepback is forty (40) feet. • Distinctive roofs forms: The roof form used in our project is a distinctive curved form with balustrades as per the artist drawings. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Response: The proposed development provides appropriate buffers both in landscaping design and in building, parking and entrance placement given available space on the lot as per landscape plans and site plans. The enhanced landscape design includes many approved variety of plants and trees including Medjool Palms for beautiful street- soaping. We are including about 5 feet of distance on the north and side and 3 feet of distance on the south side of the lot for maintenance and are including climbing vines on the walls to soften the appearance. ORIGINAL RECENED K9V 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTNiW CITY OF CLEARWATF? 0 0 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1. The proposed building line on the front of the lot is and average distance of thirty (30) feet from the front property line and varies from ten (10) feet to forty (40) feet, due to the shape of the property. The existing front building set-back distance for the apartment building to the South is thirty (30) feet and is therefor a consistent with our proposed build-to line. 2. We are also including in our drawing the front gates. We would like to keep the gates in the front of the property in order to have the required security for the new tenants. The current neighborhood is a high crime area with prostitutes, drug dealers/users and other criminals. We cannot sell our units without the ability for residents to feel secure. Additionally, a Police Captain of Pinellas County has shown an interest in our project but expressed concerns about the local high crime neighborhood and recommended that security was very important for this property. We would like to keep the gates open and not easily visible during the daylight hours. This can be a good compromise because during the day the gates would not be visible and it would not create any traffic issues when people drive up to the entrance. The gates will be closed at night for tenant security and opened early in the morning. The success of this project on N. Fort Harrison in the Old Bay District will get the ball rolling for similar projects and help realize the Goals of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 3. The utility plans have been revised in accordance with our earlier meeting with James Keller from the Fire Department. The proposed FDC next to the sign is actually in front of the sign. It is only the FDC label that is shown behind the sign. Therefore the proposed FDC is shown next to the driveway, in front of the sign and should be accessible to the Fire Department. OR1GX R?C?1VE ?N?EN P1ANNp CLEP`RW?`?E? CAN 4W.. I Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1 , 205.00 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: MTV o 0 ON PLANNING OEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER d§104 $?C*EIVED * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006) "PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Mark N. Tezaris, Owner APPLICANT NAME: Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 4965 W. Breeze. Circle, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (347) 683-6715 FAX NUMBER: (718) 408-3276 PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Mark N. Tezaris I Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC Frank C. Schlotter, P.E. 6885 Co erfield Drive New Port Riche FL 34655-5603 (727) 372-9256 FAX NUMBER: (727) 372-4586 (727) .992-0150 E-MAILADDRESS: schlotter0l@msn.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): Clearwater Gardens Condo PROJECT VALUATION: $ 9,000.000 601-North Fort Harrisbh Avenue 09/29/15/60120/000/0010 0.652 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 28,485 Parcel I, Lot 1, Nicholson & Sloan S/D, P.B. 1, Page 38 Parcel II Lots 19 & 20, Bidwells Oakwood Addition to ,____, _,G earwa er, . g-46 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Redevelop existing car wash to luxury condominiums Specifically identify the request Request flexibility of maximum allowable density'-from (include number of units or square --- ---- footageofnon-residentialuse and all 16 to 18 units by participation in a street scape requested code deviations;e.g. Request flexibilty of landscape plan and reduction in required number of program. - ---?--- - - ----- parking spaces specific use, etc.) buffering requirements, (See Attachment). S:1Planning DepartmentWpplication Formsldevelopment review12006 FormslComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 1 of 8 I DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UN DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO_ (if yes, attach a copy of the.applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) 76 SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) (See Attachment) Of Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. CGC will be in harmony with the Old Bay District r d_v opmPnt_nlan_ Optimum density can be achieved with flexible standards, while minimi71n FAR coverage. CGC will be a catalyst for neighboring properties redevel- ment, (adjoining old apartment building and boat repair yar . 2. The proposed development will- not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Clearwater Gardens Luxury Condominiums will greatly improve the value of existing neighboring properties and encourage like redevelopment consistent with the Old Bay District plan. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. CGC will provide a safe and secure environment for residents and not create a source of uncontrolled pollution Expanding the tax base will provide additional financial resources to support public health services 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. CGC will provide off-street parking for 2 spaces per unit plus 2 H/C spaces and allows ample room to pull-off out of the roadway and into the property. CGC is close to downtown Clearwater and therefore pedestrian friendly 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development CGC character is mediterranean architectural style and is consistent with neighboring redevelopemnt projects such as Scientology buildings, proposed Island View, Harrison Village and others in the vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Landsca ing and building textures will soften adverse acoustic impacts. CGC will be attractive, inviting, appealing and-,.desirable to residents and neighbors An enclosed dumpster will be provided, emptied and sanitized twice weekly for garbage collection and disposal. RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 S:\Planning Department\Application Form s\developm ent review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 2 of s PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Crr° CLEARWATER $1 Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: (See Attachment) 1.. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Flexibility with landscape buffering and density requirements will allow achievement of optimal economic feasibility, while adhering to building setback lines and maximum height limitations. Streetscaping is offered as compensation for above mentioned flexibility. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this, Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district _CGC proposed redevelopment is consistent with the Old Bay District plan and meets criteria for permitted uses, zoning and density standards. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. CGC proposed use of residential luxury condominiums. is consistent with neighborhood land uses and will compliment and support other uses, such as retail and professional and will not impede orderly redevelopmen 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development CGC will immediately help to upgrade the neighborhood in terms of desirability and property market values. CGC will not be a detriment to any adj oining properties to the best of our knowledge. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following lectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; Oc The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. CGC fits-in perfectly with the Old Bay District and the City of Clearwater's redevelopment plans and is consistent with permitted land uses, zoning and redevelopment standards. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area: d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: Changes in horizontal building planes; Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; Variety in materials, colors and textures; Distinctive fenestration patterns; Building stepbacks; and Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The mediterranean architectural style of CGC will enhance the character of the neighborhood increase community---pride-and provide luxury homes S:\Planning DepartmentWpplication Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4202.A.21) VK A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; N1 Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property Ones; VoK Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; qd All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure, A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with / the City manual. Q111 Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; 9( Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable P ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) V SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; tK TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing heel, TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborisr, of all trees 8' DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; Ild' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards fie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; 1Q GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued Until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill ProiQkWIV XDQ1M TER Page 4 of 8 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) (See Attached Site and Architectural Plans) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow, Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; _ All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, stone and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtentlabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number.of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; _ Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. will REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 %s X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED 0 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; PROPOSED Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ORIGINAL _ All open space areas; RECEIVED _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; f Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); pf ISO Y 0 9 2006 Streets and drives (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTMENT Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); CITY OF CLEARWATER Structural overhangs; S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\comprenensive mnn rrofecr trLu) ZV??.? Page 5 of 8 L1 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) / (See Attached Landscape Plans) LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing, Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all _ existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures, Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) (See Attached Architectural Plans) BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; _ All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 Y. X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) (See Attached Architectural Plans) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs: Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Q Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ORIGINAL RECEIVED ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 6 of 8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801_C) IUV 0 9 2006 O Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Of Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. X- Traffic Impact Study is not required. *CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. gl Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): X4&7- Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative Mark N. Tezaris, Owner acCa sq(:) - STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 0 9 day of November A.D. 20__Q_E_ to me and/or by who is personally known has produced t- .N••NN•••..-•.•••r•....•.N•N•,•• as identificati SHERRY L. WATKINS M? co - I00=4114 Notary public,: ?yyyhppt?425? My commission a?m AWLft l S:\Planning Department\Application Form s\developm ent review\2006 Forms\Compr¢hWivJlfrfilfProtect (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 7 of 8 J N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: Mark N. Tzarist Owner Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 601 North Fort Harrison Avenue 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Redevelopment Permit 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Frank C. Schlotter, P.E. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7 That (Move), the undeogned authoriq hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. rop ity OAner Mark N. Tezaris Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this Nov:.' 2006 personally appeared Mark N. Tezaris Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: Property Owner Property Owner th day of - who having been first duly swum «w...«..............ATKI. S....« SHERRY L Comm# DD0384114 Expires 1/8/2009 ISO 2-4254: a Notary Assn.. Inc ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SAPlanning Department\Application Forms\development reviewX2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FWTV0TkWWATER Page 8 of 8 Pinellas County Propertypraiser Information: 09 29 15 60120 00010 Page 2 of 4 09 / 29 / 15 / 60120 / 000 / 0010 20-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:02:54 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TEZARIS & BIEBER AQUISITIONS LLC OBK: 14943 OPG: 0316 4965 W BREEZE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 EVAC: Nan-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 601 N FT HARRISON AUE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 261.88 sales from 2003 - 2"4: O Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,006 14,943/ 316 950,000 (Q) I 1912: Book 001 Pgs 038- 11/2,004 13,94611,081 400,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/2,003 13,299/ 627 250,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 9 /1,998 10.230/1,648 220,000 (Q) I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 251,400 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 251,400 Institutional Exem: 10 Tax Exempt x: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 251,400 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth OS Taxes; 5,841.83 1) 17Z x 167 6.00 29,053-00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 5,841.83 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 51841.83 Short Legal NICHOLSON & SLOAN'S ADD LOT i AND BIDWELL'S OAK Description WOOD ADD LOTS 19 & 20 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Building Information NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER httn-//name. co _ninellas.fl.us/htbin/cei-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r-&s=1 &u=O&p=09+29+15+... 04/20/2006 Pinellas County Property&raiser Information: 09 29 15 60120 010 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descries ons 09 / 29 / 15 / 00120 / 000 / 0010 :01 20-Apr-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:02:54 Commercial Card 61 of i Improvement Type: Service Garage Property Address: 601 N FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 345 Land Use: 27 structural Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor • Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Bar 3oist/Rigid Fram Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Fair Year Built 1,288 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,830 7) .08 0 2) Canopy .20 403 8) t .00 0 0 3} .00 0 9) .00 4) .00 0 10) .09 O 5) .00 0 11) .08 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Fe3atire3s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 10080 1.75 10,880 17,640 17,640 999 2) .00 0 0 • • 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 • 5) .00 0 0 0 • 6) .00 0 0 • 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 17,640 ORIGINAL RECEIVED Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information N v OV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER httn-//nac.co.nineflas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r-&s=1 &u=o&p=09+29+15+... 04/20/2006 , FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FLD2006-06041 601 North Fort Harrison Avenue Page 1 Item B - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section -202.A) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Response: We are requesting to redevelop the existing car wash to luxury condominiums similar in quality to the Bay view Condominiums, Antigua Bay Yacht Club and the Island View. We are also requesting to increase the density from 16 units to 18 by participation in the street scape program. We will move the wrought iron fence back from the side walk several feet and will create a pedestrian friendly side walk and sitting area. We will pave the side walk and driveway in front of the lot with approved pavers. In the sitting area we will also add two street benches, a garbage can and tree shading over the to encourage pedestrian activity and a dynamic street life. We are also requesting flexibility in the land scaping plan and buffering requirements. Page 2 Item D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REOUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Response: This project is at the beginning phase of the redevelopment of the Old Bay District on North Ft. Harrison's west side and there are not many new developments adjacent to or near by to use for comparison. The proposed redevelopment will be closer in harmony with the scale and bulk of the adjacent property on the south side. This property is a three story multifamily. Clearwater Gardens will be a four story building within the 40 feet in height limitation. The fourth floor is required in order to build enough units with enough square footage to financially cost justify the project's risk/reward ratios. With less than 18 units and a slowing condo market this project cannot be viable. Adjacent on the north side is a boat yard which is inconsistent with the Old Bay plan and not directly compariable to the planned Clearwater Gardens Luxury condominiums. Generally speaking, coverage is encouraged in the overall downtown redevelopment plan to create a "critical mass of activity". Clearwater Gardens will balance the coverage of the lot space with a friendly pedestrian sitting area in front of the lot and with lush landscaping in the front and back of the lot. This coverage will be a much better balance than the adjacent three story old multifamily on the south side and the adjacent boat yard yard on the north side. Again, this project is at the beginning phase of the redevelopment of the Old Bay District on North Ft. Harrison's west side and there are not many new developments ORIGINAL RECEIVED f "U"i 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER adjacent to or near by to use for comparison. "A variety of densities and housing styles are encouraged throughout the Old Bay District" as per the Clearwater Down Town Redevelopment plan. The density of the adjacent three story old multifamily on the south side seems consistent with the 18 units planned for Clearwater Gardens. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Response: Clearwater Gardens will develop new luxury condominiums that will be selling for about $300 a square foot. Once sold, these comparables will serve as input into the best use of the land calculations for the adjacent old multifamily on the south side and the boat yard on the north side. The success of this project will encourage the adjacent owners to ultimately look for a better return on their money. This can ultimately mean selling to a developer or redeveloping the property them selves consistent with the Old Bay District Plan. 3. The proposed development will not adversely effect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Response: Clearwater Gardens will replace the current car wash business which uses cleaning chemicals and generates a lot of traffic in and out with a luxury residential development. This will provide a safer, more secure and healthier environment for the current residents and expand the tax base to further support public health services. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimise traffic congestion. Response: We will minimize traffic congestion by first replacing the busy 24X7 car wash with 18 luxury condominiums which will have a fraction of the current traffic. Second, we will provide off-street parking for 2 spaces per unit plus 2 Handicap spaces. We will also allow ample room to pull off the road and into the property. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The current character of the vicinity is residential with a mix of land uses including residential and commercial uses which are surrounded by non-conforming vehicle services such as the current car wash on this site and the adjacent boat repair yard on the north side. The existing vehicle services results in incompatible development patterns and uses based on the Downtown Redevelopment plan's vision for this district. The proposed residential condominiums, and street scaping conform to and are much more in sync with the intended character and vision for this district. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Response: The new attractive, luxury residential development will significantly be more visually pleasing to the eye, have much less noise from loud music by people blasting their music while cleaning their cars, not have rotting fish tossed out by people cleaning their fishing boats on the site, and will not have the current 24X7 hours of operation of the busy car/boat wash on the site. Overall the new residential development will be a major improvement over the car-wash business on this site. Paee 3. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect Criteria) ? Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Res op nse: (See Flexible Development Application) 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. Response: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS GOAL - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL CONTINUE TO PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES AND SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND ENSURE THAT THESE RESOURCES ARE SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATED INTO THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT THROUGH LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS, AND COORDINATION WITH FUTURE LAND USE INTENSITIES AND CATEGORIES. This residential project is not an environmentally sensitive property. It has no wetlands, beach dunes, sensitive soils, or other natural systems and therefore not prohibited to redevelopment. Further, this development does not have the potential to discharge toxic chemicals. This residential project is also in a Non-Evacuation zone and therefore does not complicate hurricane evacuation plans. 2. GOAL - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL UTILIZE INNOVATIVE AND FLEXIBLE PLANNING AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES, AND URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS IN ORDER TO PROTECT HISTORIC ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RESOURCES, ENSURE NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION, REDEVELOP BLIGHTED AREAS, AND ENCOURAGE INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Clearwater Gardens is located in the Old Bay District and has a clear priority for redevelopment. The city of Clearwater has promised financial development incentives and a higher density bonus in exchange for street scaping amenities. 3. GOAL - A SUFFICIENT VARIETY AND AMOUNT OF FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORIES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ACCOMMODATE PUBLIC DEMAND AND PROMOTE INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Clearwater Gardens complies with Future Land Use High Density Residential category specified in the Comprehensive plan. 4. GOAL - THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES MEET THE SAFETY, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND AESTHETIC NEEDS OF THE CITY THROUGH CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE. Clearwater Gardens has created and submitted a landscaping plan and meets the City of Clearwater landscape requirements of the Community Development Code. 5. GOAL - THE CITY SHALL NOT PERMIT DEVELOPMENT TO OCCUR UNLESS AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE IS AVAILABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT. AREAS IN WHICH THE IMPACT OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENT EXCEED THE DESIRED LEVELS OF SERVICE WILL BE UPGRADED CONSISTENT WITH THE TARGET DATES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE APPLICABLE FUNCTIONAL PLAN ELEMENT. After meeting with the department heads of DRC, we have understood that the current, interim, and ultimately desired Levels of Service for traffic circulation, transit, water, sewer, garbage collection, and drainage systems are adequate to serve the planned new development of Clearwater gardens. 6. GOAL - TO COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF NEW AND EXPANDED SCHOOL SITES AND FACILITIES IN ORDER TO ENSURE COMPATIBILITY AND CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Clearwater Gardens is a residential project and not an educational facility. Therefore, this goal does not apply directly. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NIA 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • TRANSPORATION ELEMENT GOALS "The purpose of the Transportation Element is to plan for a multi-modal transportation system in Clearwater which includes public transit, bicycling, walking, air travel, rail facilities, vehicular traffic and parking facilities, establish intermodal connections and support the Future Land Use Element." Therefore, the Goals within this element do not seem to apply directly to our project. HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS 16. GOAL - AN AFFORDABLE VARIETY OF STANDARD HOUSING UNITS IN DECENT AND SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS REGARDLESS OF RACE, NATIONALITY, AGE, MARITAL STATUS, HANDICAP, OR RELIGION. According to the Comprehensive Plan, "The population of the City of Clearwater is expected to grow to 112,830 permanent residents by the year 2010. To accommodate permanent and seasonal residents and maintain a healthy vacancy rate, approximately 2,500 new housing units will be needed. Large, vacant parcels of land are scarce in Clearwater. Because of this, infill development of small vacant lots and under-utilized parcels will be necessary, and should be encouraged, to provide for new households." The development of the current car wash to residential condominiums is consistent with these objectives and overall goal. UTILITIES ELEMENT GOALS The Goals within this element pertain to municipalities do not seem to apply directly to our project. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT GOALS The Goals within this element pertain to coastal properties and do not seem to apply directly to our project. CONSERVATION ELEMENT GOALS 25. GOAL - TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND TO ENHANCE NATURAL FEATURES WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO THE EXISTENCE OF THE NATURAL QUALITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF CLEARWATER'S SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENT. As per our last DRC meeting on August 3, 2006, we agreed that we would do two things with the Land Resources department. One was that we would replace the inches of trees removed, including the two Oak trees, and the second was that we ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER financially contribute to a fund based on the inches removed. We also will calculate this amount and put the agreement in writing. This project will also comply with the one hundred (100) year floodplain requirements and standards of the Federal Emergency Management Agency of the Federal Flood Insurance Administration, and the City's building codes. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT GOALS Given the small lot size, we have agreed to pay the substantial impact fees to help reach these goals. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT GOALS The Goals within this element pertain to municipalities do not seem to apply directly to our project. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT GOALS The Goals within this element pertain to municipalities do not seem to apply directly to our project. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. Response: This luxury condominium redevelopment is one of the first to take place on North Fort Harrison in the Old Bay District that will also include the beautiful street scaping outlined in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This will help the current value of the surrounding properties by proving a potentially better use for the land based on the comparable prices created by the sales of the new condominiums. This new value can only be realized to it's full extent by redevelopment of the old properties to new following the Goals and principles of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. Response: The adjoining property on the south side is an old house converted to small apartments. This luxury condominium redevelopment next door will potentially make this property more valuable due to the beautiful new building replacing the unattractive busy noisy car wash next door. Additionally, the comparable prices created by the sales of the new condominiums can only help the value of the apartment house. Second, the adjoining property on the north side is a boat repair yard will not suffer any detriment from a beautiful new building replacing the unattractive busy noisy car wash next door. This can only help their property values for reasons mentioned above ORIGINAL RECEIVED NO 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER and may create additional demand for their services due to new resident moving in next door that may own boats. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; Response: (See Flexible Development Application) b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; Response: The proposed use of eighteen luxury condominiums will be a significant economic contributor and diversify the local economy for the following reasons: • The construction will create construction and other jobs for about two years • The locally purchased construction materials will also add economically • The Clearwater tax base will be increase economically by the new residents downtown • The local shops and the services sector will also gain economically due added demand by the new residents c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; Response: The former unattractive busy, noisy 24X7 car wash which was part _of the "Prohibited Uses Automobile service stations, all types of vehicle sales and services," listed in the Downtown Clearwater Re-development Plan concerning the Old Bay District will be replaced by a luxury residential development. These new residents will also be consumers of the local products and services and contribute to the tax base in a greater capacity than the former car wash did. d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; Response: The proposed condominiums will be priced significantly lower than other new developments in the area such as the Antiqua Bay Yacht Club and the Island View with our prices starting at about $287.00 a square foot. e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or Response: (See Flexible Development Application) ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARw,T% f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Response: (See Flexible Development Application) 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required set backs, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; Response: (See Flexible Development Application) b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; Response: (See Flexible Development Application) c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; Response: (See Flexible Development Application) d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; Pp • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building step-backs; and • Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. Response: (See Flexible Development Application) ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER :Clearwater 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded Into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 0 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL TWO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 03/27/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Mark N. Tezaris, Owner APPLICANT NAME: Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 4965 W. Breeze Circle, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (347.). 683-6715 FAX NUMBER. (718) 408-3276 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Mark N. Tezaris, Owner L61 ALL owners on the deed Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC AGENT NAME: Frank C. Schlotter, P.E. MAILING ADDRESS: 6885 Copperfield Drive, New Port Richey, FL 34655-5603 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 372-9256 FAX NUMBER: (727) 372-4586 CELL NUMBER: (727) 992-01 50 E-MAIL ADDRESS: schlotter0l@msn.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Gardens PROJECT VALUATION: $ 9,000,000 STREET ADDRESS: 601 N. Fort Harrison Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 09/29/15/60120/000/0010 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.652 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): _..2 8 , 4 8 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel _I, Lot 1, Nicholson & Sloan S/D, P B 1 , Page 38 Parcel II, Lots 19 & 20, Bidwells Oakwood Add., P.B. 1 HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? Two HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? 0 IS THERE A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES NO X IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: C:IMNDO"ITEMPOR-IICONTENT.IE5IADAXY5Y5AblicAmenfimslnmftePool US&Appdcabon2006.doc I` OV O 9 2006 Pagel of 2 PLANNING DEPARTMtly CITY OF MEAPW;hYr-4.' pl- 1 t ASSESSMENT OF OPEN SPACE/RECREATION IMPACT °????arwater U Parks and Recreation TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT (PLEASE PROVIDE ALL INFORMATION APPLICABLE TO PROJECT): DATE: 8/23/06 PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Gardens Condo PROJECT ADDRESS: 601 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue (FLD2006-06041) EXISTING FLOOR AREA: 3,240 SF PROPOSED FLOOR AREA: 6,559 SF (needed only for non-residential or non-residential converting to residential) IF RESIDENTIAL, # EXISTING UNITS: 0 # PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 18 IF HOTEL/MOTEL, # EXISTING GUEST ROOMS: n/a # PROPOSED GUEST ROOMS: n/a PARCEL GROSS LAND AREA: 28,485 SF PARCEL NET LAND AREA: 28,485 SF JUST VALUE OF LAND ONLY ACCORDING TO CURRENT YEAR'S PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT: $ 251.400 (VERIFICATION REQUIRED) 2005 tax figures IF VACANT PROPERTY, MOST RECENT SALE PRICE: $ n/a (VERIFICATION REQUIRED) VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT: $ 8.83 (SALE PRICE OR JUST VALUE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER _ BY GROSS LAND AREA) I ATTEST THAT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED ABOVE IS CORRECT, COMPLETE AND TRUE. PROPERTY OWNER/AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE DATE NOTE: All fees payable to the "City of Clearwater"., Open Space & Recreation Land fees submitted to the Parks and Recreation Dept.; Recreation Facility fees submitted to Development Services Dept., both located at the Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue. Timing of payment: prior to issuance of building permit or city approval of final plat, and/or prior to annexation. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS 1. OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT - See Note Above Expansions/Redevelopments: Floor Area to be Added 3,319 SF (do not use for residential unless Existing Floor Area -.-3,240 SF commercial converting to residential) Ratio of Added to Existing = 102 % (Proceed if 50% or Greater) BASED ON FLOOR AREA (Commercial/Nonresidential, Commercial converted to Residential and Mixed Use): New Construction and Applicable Expansions/Redevelopments increasing floor area by 50% or more: Parcel Net Land Area 28,485 SF Open Space Factor (2% or 4%) x 4% = 1,139.40 SF (2% if floor area increase is 50% to 99%; 4% if increase is 100% or greater) OR BASED ON RESIDENTIAL UNITS (Existing and Proposed Residential Use Only): ORIGIf Expansions/Redevelopments: # of Units to be Added RECER (proposed less existing) ?:?V O 9 # of Proposed Units - % (Proposed to Existing) Total Parcel Net Land Area x SF PLANNING DI Land Area Subject to Assessment SF CITY OF CLE Open Space Factor x .04 = SF Open Space Assessment 1,139.40 SF x VALUE/SQ.FT. 8.83 =$ 10,060.90 II. RECREATION LAND ASSESSMENT-Not to exceed 6% of parcel net land area if private facilities provided-See Note Above # of Residential Units to be Added 18 x 150 SF = 2,700 SF OR Parcel Net Land Area x 6% 1,709.10 SF Recreation Land Assessment 1,709.10 SF x VALUE/SQ.FT. 8.83 =$ 15.091.35 III. RECREATION FACILITY ASSESSMENT - See Note Above # of Residential Units to be Added 18 x $200 Recreation Facility Assessment =$ 3,600.00 TOTAL DUE (l, 11 & III) ..............................................................................................=$ 28.752.25 PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE DATE R s:\Parks\Forms\1800-0310 Impact Fee Form I 1-16-05.doc-Completed form to be retained in Parks and Recreation Administrative Office as a permanent record according to City and State Records Management guidelines. 4 P 0 0 C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. A 4: Signature of property owner J(epresentat' e Mark N. Tezaris, Property Owner J STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 0 9 day of Ncavember A.D. 20 to me and/or by , who is personally known has produced Driver's License as idgrntification. /-- 1 'Y4?-„ A I Ntgary public, i My commission exp' es: PROVIDE A C LETE DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENITIES PROPOSED TO BE PROVIDED (attach drawings, photographs, etc. as applicable): ---- - - - ---- --- - - - --- . Sidewalk__pavers in front of property on.North Fort___. _ Harrison-- t0match patterns__chosen_bythe_Cityof Clearwater. Pavers will- .continue _on - the ,entrance Driveway...-_._._ ..,- 2). One or more park-type benches on sidewalk in front of --..------ .. - - propertyr along with trash cans and lighting. __.._.__ ---------- 3) Landscaping, (see landscaping plan),.-including Medj_ool Pa.1ms.__ -..---_ reasonable..-reque,sts_-. by.._ the _C_ty_.._of. Clearwa_ter.._-, -___ _Alsore-ferto Site Plan. Sheet. C2_.1.... _..for....propo.sed amenities.. ------ - --------------- --- -------- ............................................. SHERRY L. WATKINS ra r ?n, Comma DD0384114 ;• Explns 1/8/2009 Bwiftd thru (800)432-4254 S t A ?N ii iimii mm" N.wM ?w. wN.nn C:IMNDO"ITEMPOR-1lCOWMAtT.IE51ADAXY5Y5Vk blic Amenfts Incentive Pool Use Application 2006.doc Page 2 of 2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • June 28, 2006 Mr. Brian Barker CITY OF CLEARWATER Public Works Administration 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 (727) 562-4779 Office Re: Stormwater Narrative Report for Clearwater Gardens Condominiums Dear Mr. Barker, • Engineers - Planners Project Managers Schlotter & Associates ORIGINAL RECEIVED NO 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN' CITY OF CLEARWATE? This Stormwater Narrative Report was prepared by adhering to the City of Clearwater Department of Public Works Storm Drainage Design Criteria guidelines and the applicable sections of the Engineering checklist as closely as possible. The address of the project is 601 North Fort Harrison Avenue, Clearwater, Florida and is located between Jones and Eldridge Street. The site is presently a self-service car wash that is not currently operating and the car wash will be demolished for redevelopment into a four-story, eighteen (18) unit luxury condominium residential project. The site is rectangular in shape and is approximately 0.65 acres in size, (28,485 s.f.). The existing site includes a car wash building with five (5) self-service bays and one (1) automatic car wash bay, asphalt pavement and a stormwater collection and treatment system. The existing normally dry detention pond has a surface area of approximately 2,275 s.f. and a storage volume of approximately 2,000 c.f., without an over-flow structure. The existing storm-sewer structures and piping will need to be removed and replaced to correspond with the new site development plan layout. The existing detention pond will be reshaped and deepened to provide additional storage volume. P.O. Box 3256, Holiday, Florida 34690-0256 (727) 372-9256 Voice (727) 372-4586 FAX 0 Clearwater Gardens Condominiums Stormwater Narrative Report June 28, 2006 Page 2 of 4 • ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The proposed stormwater collection and treatment system consists of FDOT Type "C" Inlet Structures, 15" diameter reinforced concrete piping, a concrete energy dissipater and a normally dry bottom detention pond. Water quality treatment for one-half inch (1/2") of run- off over the entire site is being provided and that volume is 1,187 c.f.,. Attenuation for a 50 year/1 hour storm event without an over-flow out-fall is being provided. The proposed detention storage volume is 5,600 c.f.,. The pond draw-down shall occur in less than 24 hours after the end of the design storm event. The seasonal high water level is 24.0 feet and the proposed pond bottom elevation is 25.0 feet. The proposed design high water level is 29.0 feet and the lowest top of bank spill-over elevation is 29.5 feet, providing for the required 6 inches of free-board. There are no existing or proposed surface waters or wetlands on this site. SWFWMD Stormwater Permits and any other required regulatory permits shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance. The subject site in not in a FEMA designated flood plain and is therefore not subject to a base flood elevation. The proposed minimum lowest floor building elevation on site is 32.00 feet and are the floor elevations of the parking garages. The lowest finished floor elevation of the proposed condominium building and clubhouse is 32.50 feet. The design frequency used shall be a 50 year storm based on the rainfall intensity graph for the Clearwater area. The duration is obtained from the Rational Method, since this site is less than 10 acres and in fact is less than 1 acre, (0.65 acre). The soil type is highly disturbed urban land. In the methodology for calculating stormwater flow for property undergoing redevelopment, the pre-development volume of run-off was calculated by the use of % the actual weighted coefficient of run-off. The water quality standard applied shall provide for the treatment of/2 inch of rainfall as applied over the entire area of the development project. The design hydrograph is an isosceles triangle with a time of concentration equal to one half of the duration. The detention design incorporates a time of concentration of one hour and a 50 year storm intensity. The out-fall is restricted to no pre-development flow. The detention pond provides for one half foot (05) freeboard. The volume of detention was established by multiplying the time of concentration times the change in flow (DELTA Q), and no pre or post-development flow is being allowed to pass, (over-flow) since an acceptable amount of storage volume is being provided. P.O. Box 3256, Holiday, Florida 34690-0256 (727) 372-9256 Voice (727) 372-4586 FAX r: Clearwater Gardens Condominiums Stormwater Narrative Report June 28, 2006 Page 3 of 4 LJ ORIGINAL RECENED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWgTEP The dry detention pond is designed to be normally dry since the pond bottom elevation is one foot lower than the seasonal high water table elevation, (Pond Bottom Elevation is 25.0 feet, Seasonal High Water Table Elevation is below 24.0'). The Double Ring Infiltrometer stabilized infiltration rate was measured to be 25.7 inches per hour and therefore the detention pond will drain dry in approximately two (2) hours, which is less than the 24 hour maximum. The Double Ring Infiltrometer Test Report performed by Professional Service Industries, Inc., (PSI Project No. 390-65023), dated May 19, 2006, is attached to this Stormwater Narrative Report for documentation. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS: EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: DETENTION POND: 2,275 S.F. X 1.00 = 2,275 BUILDING AREA: 18,875 S.F. X 0.95 = 17,931 PAVED AREA: CONCRETE AREA: GREEN AREA: 7,335 S.F. X 0.20 = 1,467 TOTAL AREA - BASIN 28,485 S.F. 21,673 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: DETENTION POND: 2,309 S.F. X 1.00 = 2,309 BUILDING AREA: 6,577 S.F. X 0.95 = 6,248 PAVED AREA: 11,890 S.F. X 0.95 = 11,296 CONCRETE AREA: 4,660 S.F. X 0.95 = 4,427 GREEN AREA: 3,049 S.F. X 0.20 = 610 TOTAL AREA - BASIN 28,485 S.F. 24,890 PRE-REDEVELOPMENT COEFFICIENT, (Ce): 21,673 / (28,485X2) = 0.3805 POST-REDEVELOPMENT COEFFICIENT, (Cp): 24,890 / 28,485 = 0.8738 DIFFERENTIAL COEFFICIENT, (Cd): (0.8738 - 0.3805) = 0.4933 INTENSITY, (150; 50 YEAR, 1 HR) = 4.0 HRS P.O. Box 3256, Holiday, Florida 34690-0256 (727) 372-9256 Voice (727) 372-4586 FAX Clearwater Gardens Condominiums Stormwater Narrative Report June 28, 2006 Page 4 of 4 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER QUALITY TREATMENT: REQUIRED/ PROPOSED STORAGE: 28,485 / 24, (1/2" RUN-OFF) _ WATER QUANTITY TREATMENT: REQUIRED STORAGE: Q = CIA 0.4933 X 4.0 X 0.6539 X 3600 = PROPOSED STORAGE: SOILS INFILTRATION RATE: SOIL TYPE: URBAN LAND, (S.C.S. SOIL SURVEY) SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION, (7 FT. PLUS DEEP) PERMEABILITY RATE: 25.7 IN. / HR.; USE 20 IN. / HR. 650 S.F. BOTTOM AREA X 1.66 FT. / HR. 2 SAFETY FACTOR 5,760 C.F. = 11 HR. < 24 HR. O.K. 542 C.F. / HR. 1,187 C. F. 4,645 C.F. 5,760 C.F. 24.0 FT. 1.66 FT. / HR. 542 C.F. / HR. Should there be any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 372-9256. Respectfully Submitted by, SCHLOTTER & ASSOCIATES Certificate of Authorization No. 3811 ank C. Schlotter, P.E. FL Pro. Eng.- Lic. No.: 32045 att. Professional Service Industries, Inc Double Ring Infiltrometer Test PSI Project No. 390-65023 CASMCGC%Stomm ter Narrative ReporLdoc P.O. Box 3256, Holiday, Florida 34690-0256 (727) 372-9256 Voice (727) 372-4586 FAX • rjG7A;F Infonnatzon BTo Build On Engineering - Consulting - Testing May 19, 2006 Schlotter & Associates P.O. Box 3256 Holiday, FL 34692-0258 Attention: Mr. Frank Schlotter • ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTrvi?;i.7 CITY OF CLEAaw,,;,-k Phone: (727) 372-9256 Fax: (727) 372-4586 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Services Report Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing & Auger Boring Clearwater Gardens Clearwater, Florida PSI Project No. 390-65023 Dear Mr. Schlotter: Thank you for choosing Professional Service Industries, Inc. (PSI) as your consultant for the referenced project. As requested PSI has completed a Double Ring Infiltrometer (DR[) test within the existing pond area. The site is located at 601 N. Fort Harrison Drive in Clearwater, Pinellas County Florida. More specifically the site is located on the east side of Fort Harrison Avenue south of Eldridge Street. The site is within Section 9, Township 29 South, and Range 15 East. The DRIT was performed at the bottom of the existing pond which was located on the west side of the property. The "Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida" published by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) was reviewed for general near surface soil information. This information indicates the primary mapping unit in the vicinity of the project site is Urban Land (Ub). This land has been heavily modified and much of it is covered with pavement and buildings, making identification of the original soil type impossible. Groundwater levels in these areas depend largely on man-made drainage systems. The approximate location of the DRI test is shown on the attached site plan. A hand auger boring was performed to a depth of approximately 7 feet below the existing grade, five feet east of the DRI location prior to performing the DRI test. The DRI test was performed approximately 3 feet below the bottom of the existing pond. The stabilized infiltration rate was measured to be 25.7 inches per hour. PSI recommends a value not greater than 20 in/hr be used for design purposes. The designer should apply the appropriate safety factor to the DR[ test values. The hand auger boring revealed fine sand (i.e. SP materials) to boring termination depths of 7 feet below grade. Professional Service Industries, Inc. - 16550 Scheer Boulevard, Suite 1 - Hudson, FL 34667 - Phone 727/868-9526 - Fax 727/868-0094 FL Engineering Business 3684 • Groundwater was not encountered within the depth explored. It should be noted that groundwater levels tend to fluctuate during periods of prolonged drought and extended rainfall and may be affected by man-made influences. In addition, a seasonal effect will also occur in which higher groundwater levels are normally recorded during the rainy season. Based on the published data and our soil boring we estimate that the seasonal high groundwater level will be about 4 feet below the bottom of the pond. We appreciate the opportunity to offer our services on this project and look forward to working with you in the future. Should there be any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (727) 868-9526. We look forward to working with you and your organization on this and future projects. Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. Certificate of Authorization No. 3684 gvyOaS e,P. . Branch Manager Florida Licence No. 63870 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER N SS: P:2006geo/65023_rpt Attachment: Sheet 1 - Drit Location Map and Soil Profile DRI Test Results Graph Pvi . 2 Civil-Tech Consulting Engineers CTCE # 05225-Mid-Florida Community Services Hernando County, Florida PSI Project No. 390-65007 DOUBLE-RING INFILTROMETER TEST Clearwater Gardens, DRI # 1 30.00 25.00 20.00 c d 15.00 0 L ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------- Average Infiltration Rate: 25.7 in/hr Depth of Test = 36 Inches ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SHGWT = 5 feet ----•-------------------------------------------------------•----------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- --------- ) 0.00 5.00 0.00 V au 100 150 Elapsed Time (minutes) 200 250 300 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 31 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER I L Falt . 9 0 ,r BORING LOCATION PLAN 0 NOT 70 SCALE HA-1 Proposed 4 story Condominium W W v 0_ w 0 0 5 10 0 Lj O GNE ORIGINAL RECEIVED M0V 0 s 2006 PLANNING DEPARTME n CITY OF CLEARV4AT% LEGEND a 0 Approximate Hand Auger boring location 0 Approximate Double Ring Infiltrometer Test location 0 Dark brown to tan fine sand, SP 02 White fine sand, SP GNE Groundwater level not encountered DRAWN NS GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CHMM NS CLEARWATER GARDENS APPROVED NS PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 'Information SCAM NOTED n ineerin , Consulting- est n DAZE MAY 06 PRDNa 390-65023 SHEET 1 e • 1 LL Clearwater Fire & Rescue ° 610 Franklin Street - Clearwater, Florida 33756 Public Works Administration - Engineering Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 200 - Clearwater, Florida 33756 FIRE FLOW & HYDRANT WORKSHEET (Revised 03/29/2006) This worksheet is required to be submitted to and approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) prior to DRC meeting for any project that is more than 3 stories or more than 30 feet in height above the lowest Fire Dept vehicle access point or for any other project that will require an Automatic Wet Standpipe System and/or Fire Pump before any permits for new building construction, building expansion or fire hydrants will be issued by the City of Clearwater. Information and design must comply with Florida Building Code, Chapter 9 - Fire Protection Systems, Florida Fire Prevention Code to include applicable NFPA Code (NFPA 1, 13, 13D, 13E, 13R, 14, 15, 20, 291 and 1142 Annex H) and AWWA M-17 - Installation, Field Testing and Maintenance of Fire Hydrants. PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name: Clearwater Gardens Condominiums Project Address: 601 North Fort Harrison, Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 GENERAL WATER SYSTEM INFORMATION i Location of Nearest Fire Hydrant: 601 North Fort Harrison Hydrant 16 Size of Water Main Supplying Fire Flow: 8" Looped System or Dead End Water Main? Yes Static: 72 psi Residual: 66 psi Pitot: 5 0 psi Flow: 1,190 gpm Distance of Test Gauges Relative to the Base of the Riser: Horizontal Ft. Vertical Elevation 2.5 Ft. Hydrant Test Conducted by: Piper Fire Protection 5/1 7/06 (Include/Attach Copy of Actual Test Sheet) NFPA HAZARD CLASSIFICATION Area # Description of Hazard Protected (Commodity Description, Storage Height and Arrangement, if applicable): 18 Condominiums, 4 story 18 Detached Garages, 12 feet high Classification ORIGINAL RECEIVED Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 1 of 3 . , ' DESIGN PARAMETERS Area # System Type Area (sq. ft.) Density (gpm/ft) Inside Hose (gpm) Outside Hose (gpm) (see attached Fire Flow CAlculations/Water Study by Piper Fire Protection) Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary Total Needed Fire Flow (N.F.F.) Is Existing System Supply Sufficient to Meet N.F.F. Above? No X Yes System Component Applicable NFPA Standard/ Year Edition and Other Applicable Codes or Statutes Florida Fire Prevention Code/2004 Attach Additional Sheets if Necessary If Project Includes Fire Pump, Supply the Following: Fire Pump Information: Pump Capacity: 1 , 000 gpm Churn Pressure: psi Rated Pressure: psi Pressure @ 150% Flow: psi On-Site Storage Tank Capacity (?): N/A PREPARER i SPECIFIER INFORMATION Preparer Name: Mike Wiley Company Name: Pioer Fire Protection Mailing Address: 521 Commerce Drive South City: Largo State: Florida Phone: (727) 581-9339 Zip: 33770 Fax: (727) 581-8332 P.E. Seal Page 2 of 3 RECEIVED r,'OV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CI1Y t7F CLEgRWATER s ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED Fire Prevention Items to be Addressed Prior to DRC Approval: 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations / Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required, the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, NFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and NFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 2. When an FDC is required, it shall be a minimum of 15 feet from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40 feet. This hydrant shall not be located on the same main as the Fire Sprinkler and must be on the supply side of a double detector check valve. This hydrant is in addition to the hydrant that is required for firefighting purposes that is to be within 300 feet of building, as the hose lays, and on the same side of the street as the project. 3. Provide and show on the plan a minimum 30-foot turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and egress at all entrances and exits. 4. Provide and show on the site plan 24 feet of width at driveways / drive aisles for emergency vehicle ingress and egress for front and rear parking lots. Where driveways are split by an island with one-way traffic, each side of the island shall provide and show on the site plan 20 feet of width at the driveways on each side of the island. 5. Provide a Fire Department access roadway (with turn-around, Y, T or cul-de-sac) in accordance with NFPA 1. A Fire Department access roadway must have 24-foot clear width and 14-foot vertical clearance, and be capable of supporting the weight of Fire Department vehicles (80,000lbs). ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 3 of 3 0 _ . _ Fire Protection by Computer Design PIPER FIRE PROTECTION 521 COMMERCE DRIVE SOUTH LARGO FLORIDA 33770 727-581-9339 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Job Name CLEARWATER GARDEN Building Location UNIT 5 -4th FLOOR System Contract Data File GARDEN.WXF Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 fflm&mk PIPER FIRE PROTECTION Page 1 CLEARWATER GARDEN Date HYDRAULIC DESIGN INFORMATION SHEET Name - CLEARWATER GARDENS CONDOMINIUMS Date - 05/18/2006 Location - UNIT 5 -4th FLOOR Building - System No. - Contractor - Contract No. - Calculated By - WILEY Drawing No. - Construction: ( ) Combustible ( ) Non-Combustible Ceiling Height OCCUPANCY - NFPA 13R S Type of Calculation: ( )NFPA 13 Residential (X)NFPA 13R ( )NFPA 13D Y Number of Sprinklers Flowing: ( )l ( )2 ( )4 ( ) S ( ) Other T ( )Specific Ruling Made by Date E M Listed Flow at Start Point - ll.llGpm System Type Listed Pres. at Start Point - 7 Psi (X) Wet ( ) Dry D MAXIMUM LISTED SPACING 14 x 14 ( ) Deluge ( ) PreAction E Domestic Flow Added - 0 Gpm Sprinkler or Nozzle S Additional Flow Added - 0 Gpm Make TYCO Model LF-II I Elevation at Highest Outlet - 38-0 Feet Size 1/2" K-Factor 4.2 G Note: Temperature Rating 155° N Cal culation Gpm Required 48.92 Psi Required 58.616 At Test Summary C-Factor Used: Overhead 150 Underground 150 W Water Flow Test: Pump Data: Tank or Reservoir: A Date of Test - 05/17/2006 Rated Cap. Cap. T Time of Test - 3:48 pm @ Psi Elev. E Static (Psi) - 72 Elev. R Residual (Psi) - 66 Other Well Flow (Gpm) - 1190 Proof Flow Gpm S Elevation - 2.5 P Location: 601 N. FT. HARRISON STREET, HYDRANT #16 P L Source of Information: Y ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEk I /'*? ? O ?-- *7 OZ., Zoos ?1106pz' Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 v vGitc] %.IIUP JIy %-,ui vu PIPER FIRE PROTECTION CLEARWATER GARDEN Page 2 Date City Water Supply: C1 - Static Pressure 72 PSI C2 - Residual Pressure: 66 PSI C2 - Residual Flow : 1190 GPM 150 140 130 p 120 R 110 E 100 S90 S80 U 70 R 60 E 50 40 30 20 10 ORIGINAL RECEIVED moo 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER - D12 15.375 PSI D2 - System Flow 48.92 GPM D2 - S stem Pressure 58.616 PSI Hose Adj City) GP Hose Demand) GP D3 - System Demand 4U-92-GPM Safety Margin 13.367 PSI C1 D2 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 FLOW N^1.85) • 0 Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 rluw uiayram PIPER FIRE PROTECTION CLEARWATER GARDEN Page 3 Date 1 F 11.112 E 22.553 T 22.55 T 34.67 4 <- 12.133 E 34.676 T 34.67 T 48.92 5 +- 14.256 <-- 48.927 F 48.92TASR f- 48.92BASR F-- 48.92CITy t- 48.92TEST • • ORIGINAL RECEIVED 0 9 2006 PLANNING nEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Fittings Summary • PIPER FIRE PROTECTION Page 4 CLEARWATER GARDEN Date Fitting Legend Abbrev. Name A Generic Alarm Va B Generic Butterfly Valve C Roll Groove Coupling D Dry Pipe Valve E 90' Standard Elbow F 45' Elbow G Gate Valve H 45' Grvd-Vic Elbow I 90' Grvd-Vic Elbow J 90' Grvd-Vic Tee K Detector Check Valve L Long Turn Elbow M Medium Turn Elbow N PVC Standard Elbow O PVC Tee Branch P PVC 45' Elbow Q Flow Control Valve R PVC Coupling/Run Tee S Swing Check Valve T 90' Flow thru Tee U 45' Firelock Elbow V 90' Firelock Elbow W Wafer Check Valve x 90' Firelock Tee Y Mechanical Tee Z Flow Switch Zix W W Q o N a 4 _ C? V o J 00 Gti ?y ;o, Z O U a Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Fittings Summary • or?;,' AL • RECEIVED PIPER FIRE PROTECTION Nni° 09 2006 Page 5 CLEARWATER GARDEN Date r P'Wv r\%z k.JC1 Unadjusted Fittings Table CITY O CLEARWATER 1/2 3/4 1 1 1/4 1 1/2 2 21/2 3 31/2 4 A B C 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 D E 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 F 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 G H 1.0 1.5 2.0 1 2.0 3.0 4.0 J 4.5 6.0 8.0 K L 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 M 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 N 7.0 7.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 O 3.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 8.0 P 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 Q R 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 S 4.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 T 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 8.0 U V W X Y 2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 8.0 Z 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 7.7 21.5 17.0 7.0 10.0 12.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 9.5 17.0 28.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 10.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 6.0 5.0 8.0 7.0 8.5 10.8 13.0 17.0 16.0 14.0 14.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 10.0 12.0 15.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 18.0 29.0 35.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 11.0 14.0 16.0 19.0 22.0 10.0 12.0 15.0 17.0 20.0 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.4 3.5 4.3 5.0 6.8 10.3 8.5 10.8 13.0 16.0 10.5 12.5 15.5 22.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 10.0 5 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 24 A 17.0 27.0 29.0 B 9.0 10.0 12.0 19.0 21.0 C 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 D 47.0 E 12.0 14.0 18.0 22.0 27.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 F 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 G 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 10.0 H 4.5 5.0 6.5 8.5 10.0 18.0 20.0 23.0 1 8.5 10.0 13.0 17.0 20.0 23.0 25.0 33.0 J 21.0 25.0 33.0 41.0 50.0 65.0 78.0 88.0 K 36.0 55.0 45.0 L 8.0 9.0 13.0 16.0 18.0 24.0 27.0 30.0 M 10.0 12.0 16.0 19.0 22.0 N O P Q 33.0 R 1.0 1.0 50.0 61.0 24.0 28.0 11.0 13.0 25.0 30.0 36.0 40.0 98.0 120.0 34.0 40.0 S 27.0 32.0 45.0 55.0 65.0 76.0 87.0 98.0 109.0 130.0 T 25.0 30.0 35.0 50.0 60.0 71.0 81.0 91.0 101.0 121.0 U 4.2 5.0 5.0 V 8.5 10.0 13.0 W 13.1 31.8 35.8 27.4 X 21.0 25.0 33.0 Y Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Fittings Summary z 12.0 14.0 • 10 18.0 22.0 27.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 61.0 ORIGINAL. RECEIVED NOV 0 92006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEk Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Pressure / Flow Summary - ST, DARD PIPER FIRE PROTECTION Page 6 CLEARWATER GARDEN Date Node Elevation K-Fact Pt Pn Flow Density Area Press No. Actual Actual Ran 1 38.0 4.2 7.0 na 2 38.0 4.2 7.41 na 4 38.0 4.2 8.34 na 3 38.0 8.72 na 5 38.0 4.9 8.46 na 6 38.0 8.87 na 7 9.0 26.04 na TASR 1.0 38.54 na BASR -3.0 47.05 na CITY -3.0 61.0 na TEST 2.5 58.62 na 11.11 .05 172 7.0 11.43 .05 172 7.0 12.13 .05 135 7.0 14.25 .05 80 7.0 The maximum velocity is 10.2 and it occurs in the pipe between nodes 6 and 7 ORIGINAL RECEIVED h'OV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 Final Calculations - Standard PIPER FIRE PROTECTION Page 7 CLEARWATER GARDEN Date Hyd. Qa Dia. Fi tting Pipe Pt Pt Ref. "C" or Ftng's Pe Pv ******* Notes ****** Point Qt Pf/UL Eqv. Ln. Total Pf Pn 1 11.11 1.109 2E 3.962 10.667 7.000 K Factor = 4.20 to 150 7.924 0.0 2 11.11 0.0222 18.591 0.412 Vel = 3.69 2 11.44 1.4 4E 4.862 10.667 7.412 K Factor = 4.20 to 150 2T 9.724 38.896 0.0 3 22.55 0.0264 49.563 1.307 Vel = 4.70 0.0 22.55 8.719 K Factor= 7.64 4 12.13 1.109 3E 3.962 2.750 8.337 K Factor = 4.20 to 150 11.887 0.0 3 12.13 0.0260 14.637 0.381 Vel = 4.03 3 22.54 1.4 2.542 8.718 to 150 0.0 0.0 6 34.67 0.0586 2.542 0.149 Vel = 7.23 0.0 34.67 8.867 K Factor = 11.64 5 14.25 1.109 1T 9.906 1.750 8.458 K Factor = 4.90 to 150 9.905 0.0 6 14.25 0.0351 11.655 0.409 Vel = 4.73 6 34.67 1.4 2E 4.862 22.333 8.867 to 150 1T 9.724 19.448 12.560 7 48.92 0.1105 41.781 4.616 Vel = 10.20 7 0.0 1.602 5E 5.899 104.500 26.043 to 150 2T 11.799 53.093 3.465 TASR 48.92 0.0573 157.593 9.031 Vel = 7.79 TASR 0.0 1.61 1B 0.0 8.000 38.540 to 120 1S 9.000 13.000 6 732 * Fixed loss = 5 BAS R 48.92 0.0845 1Z 4.000 21.000 . 1.775 Vel = 7.71 BASR 0.0 1.602 2E 5.899 208.000 47.048 to 150 2T 1 1.799 35.395 0.0 CITY 48.92 0.0573 1G 0.0 243.395 13.948 Vel = 7.79 CITY 0.0 1 0.28 10.000 60.998 to 140 0.0 -2.382 TEST 48.92 0.0 10.000 Vel = 0.19 .0 48.92 58.616 K Factor = 6.39 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 92006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Computer Programs by Hydratec Inc. Route 111 Windham N.H. USA 03087 ,.- t =_?_ ` -; ?- t- -?:;' • Westenberger Tree Service Inc. Certified Arborist & Tree Installation 2030 58th Street N Clearwater, Florida 33760 (727) 535-9770 (727) 507-8733 (fax) E-Mail: info@wesoveyourtrees. com - Website: www. wesaveyourtrees. com April 7, 2006 Mark Tezaris TB Homes 4965 West Breeze Circle Palm Harbor, FL 34683 RE: Clearwater Gardens 601 North Fort Harrison Clearwater, FL 33755 Dear Mr. Tezaris, ENGAGEMENT ORIGINAL RECEIVED I'OV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Per your request, dated March 24, 2006, attached please find a tree inventory for the above referenced site. Thirty-three (33) trees were tagged beginning with tag number 3545 and running consecutively to 3577 on the north side of their trunk unless otherwise specified at a height of 4.5 feet (DBH). All trees on or adjacent to the site were identified and inventoried. Trees that are not on the survey have been noted on the survey and in the inventory. OPIMON Best management practices for trees on a construction site and basic protocol for site development should be followed. Specifications and recommendations are key components of tree preservation. Trees that are to remain on or adjacent to the site should be protected prior to demolition and during construction. Damage to trees often occurs during the clearing and demolition phases. Also, these trees should receive nutritional support by inoculation and injection to compensate for construction stress. RECOMMENDATION w A tree protection zone shall be established with construction barrier. Remove any undesired trees that are not within the dripline of trees to be preserved at time of building demolition. Care is needed in removing undesired trees near preserved trees and those of adjacent property owners. Removal of vegetation, structures, asphalt, etc. within a tree protection zone should be supervised by a Certified Arborist (some tree removal and demolition may need to be performed with the smallest equipment possible or by hand). 1 0 • ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Proper trimming and pruning cuts shall be performed in accordance to ANSI Standards A300 pruning objectives 5.3 and for Palm Pruning 5.8. Root pruning is necessary if any driplines are compromised with construction or excavation. Utilities should be routed outside the tree protection zone. Treatments should be performed if recommended on any individual tree. The goal is to maximize effectiveness of growth regulators in the tree to quickly produce new growth. Several specific trees should have a temporary irrigation system installed with an automatic timer set for three times a week. Mulch should also be added to retain moisture and protect against surface compaction at a depth of at least 2-inches and no more than 4 inches. Construction barriers should be installed outside the drip-line to protect these trees. A 6-foot chain link fence with no top rail, eight-foot posts sunk two feet below grade every ten feet should be erected to enclose the tree protection zone. Heavy equipment shall avoid the root systems of trees to be preserved and must stay out of the tree protection zone. If the operator cannot safely move within the allotted space, the equipment should be downsized. Only after these trees are protected should the demolition contractor proceed with work outside the fenced areas. No debris piles, burn pits, equipment or supply storage, toilets, or washout areas are to be placed within the tree protection zone SUMNL4,RY Our intent is to always preserve as many trees as possible. The design team should take into consideration any viable tree. All trees remaining on or adjacent to the site should be protected during demolition and construction. Care should be taken when removing any asphalt within the dripline away from remaining trees and removal equipment should remain on a hard surface. Specified trees should receive nutritional support to compensate for construction stress. Trimming per ANSI Standards A300, root pruning, temporary irrigation and mulch are to be performed prior to the installation of construction barrier. Regular monitoring of preserved trees is also recommended. Following these construction protocols will help provide the best environment for preserving trees and protecting those of the neighbors. Healthy, well-cared for trees are an asset to any property. 2 11 • I affirm that my opinion has been made in total good faith based on the facts presented during my inspection, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest, except for my opinion, with the parties or pe2ple involved with this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Loren Westenberger Certified Arborist, SO-0334 ORIGINAL RECEIVED t ?) NO 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3 Registered Nursery Tree Grader, 2028 Roadside Vegetation Management Specialist Glossary • • Co-Dominant-Stems or branches with included bark, often weakly attached, that effect structural stability • Dripline-The edge of the canopy • Inoculate-Soil injection of beneficial mycorrhizal fungi, biostimulant, beneficial bacteria, vitamins, growth & rooting hormones, organic fertilizer, wetting agent, soil conditioners and nutrients, and aerate soil. • Inject-Liquid fertilizer capsules injected directly into a tree's vascular system. • ANSI A300-5.5 Pruning objectives • 5.5.1 Pruning objectives shall be established prior to beginning any pruning operation. • 5.5.2 To obtain the defined objective, the growth cycles and structure of individual species and the type of pruning to be performed should be considered • 5.5.3 Not more than 25 percent of the foliage should be removed within an annual growing season. The percentage and distribution of foliage to be removed shall be adjusted according to the plant's species, age, health, and site. • 5.5.4 Not more than 25 percent of the foliage of a branch or limb should be removed when it is cut back to a lateral. That lateral should be large enough to assume apical dominance. • 5.5.5 Pruning cuts should be made in accordance with 5.3 Pruning cuts. • 5.5.6 Heading should be considered an acceptable practice for shrub or specialty pruning when needed to reach a defined objective. • 5.5.7 Topping and lion's tailing shall be considered unacceptable pruning practices for trees. • Crown Cleaning-5.6.1 Cleaning shall consist of selective pruning to remove one or more of the following parts: dead, diseased, and/or broken branches. • Crown Raising-5.6.3 Raising shall consist of selective pruning to provide vertical clearance. • Palm Pruning-5.8 • 5.8.1 Pahn pruning should be performed when fronds, fruit, or loose petioles may create a dangerous condition. • 5.8.2 Live healthy fronds, initiating at an angle of 45 degrees or greater from horizontal, with frond tips at or below horizontal, should not be removed. • Survivability Rating- Good- Tree with good health and structural stability that has the potential for longevity at the site • Fair-Tree with fair health and/ or structural defects that can be abated with treatment; tree will require more intense management and monitoring and may have shorter lifespan than those in "good" category • Poor-Tree in poor health or with significant defects that cannot be mitigated; tree is expected to continue to decline, regardless of treatment; the species or individual may have characteristics undesirable for landscapes and is generally unsuitable for use ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4 CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMON NAME DBH HEIGHT(APPROX) TAG BOTANICAL NAME CONDITION % SURVIVABILITY 3545 Live Oak 42" 55 ft Quercus virginiana 70% GOOD 3546 Live Oak 54" 60 ft Quercus virginiana 55% FAIR Co-Dominant 3547 Queen Palm 12" 35 ft Syagrus romanzoffiana 45% FAIR 3548 Washington Palm 11" loft Washingtonia robusta 65% GOOD 3549 Washington Palm 11" 15 ft Washingtonia robusta 75% GOOD 3550 Cabbage Palm 9" 25 ft Saba/ palmetto 75% GOOD 3551 Cabbage Palm 12" 30 ft Sabal palmetto 80% GOOD 3552 Cabbage Palm 11" 25 ft Sabal palmetto 70% GOOD 3553 Cabbage Palm 13" 23 ft Saba/ palmetto 75% GOOD 3554 Laurel Oak 21" 50 ft Quercus laurifolia 40% FAIR Co-Dominant CANOPY N/S CANOPY E/W RECOMMENDATIONS 37' N / 42' S Preserve if possible: 34'E/ 42'W Crown clean deadwood 1" and larger, Sparse Demoss 95%, root prune if needed, inoculate Inject, mulch, temporary irrigation, construction barrier. Remove swing cables and chains, NE limb. 38'N / 44'S Preserve if possible: 3T E / 60'W Crown clean deadwood 1" and larger, Sparse Crown raise 15 ft over road per fire code,. root prune if needed . Storm damage in Inoculate, inject, mulch, temporary irrigation, upper canopy Construction barrier. 6' Not on property, neighbor's palm. No recommendations 4' Not on property, neighbor's palm. Inoculate, construction barrier 61 Not on property, neighbor's palm. Inoculate, construction barrier n TN / VS ' Not on property, neighbor's palm, leans West. ? Z Z 7 E/ 9 W Inoculate, construction barrier with cluster Z < m O r-v ° rn0 7' Not on property, neighbor's palm. > 3 ti • Inoculate, construction barrier with cluster ;a o F4 TN / TS Not on property, neighbor's palm, leans East. M z 9'E / T W Inoculate, construction barrier with cluster -` 71 Not on property, neighbor's palm. Inoculate, construction barrier with cluster 18'N / 15'S Not on property, neighbor's tree. 15'E / IT W Injuries: flush cuts to trunk and base, storm damage, vines Construction barrier Clearwater Gardens 1 COMMON NAME DBH HEIGHT(APPROx) TAG BOTANICAL NAME CONDITION % SURVIVABILITY 3555 Washington Palm 9" 30 ft Washingtonia robusta 65% GOOD 3556 Cabbage Palm 17" 13 ft W Side Sabal palmetto 85% GOOD 3557 Cabbage Palm 19" 25 ft Sabaf palmetto 75% GOOD 3558 Laurel Oak 8" 30 ft Quercus /aurifolia 60% GOOD 3559 Cabbage Palm 12" 15 ft Sabal palmetto 40% FAIR 3560 Cabbage Palm 12" 30 ft Sabal palmetto 90% GOOD 3561 Bluejack Oak 7" 30 ft Quercus incana 15% POOR 3562 Laurel Oak 7" 30 ft S Side Quercus laurifolia 20% FAIR 3563 Hickory 8" 45 ft S Side Carya 40% FAIR 3564 Washington Palm 10" 55 ft Washingtonia robusta 50% GOOD 3565 Laurel Oak 9" 50 ft S Side Quercus laurifolia 25% FAIR 3566 Laurel Oak 17" 65 ft Quercus laurifolia 55% FAIR CANOPY N/S CANOPY E/W 6' 6' 6' 15'N 6'S 12'E 12'W 5' 8' 4'N 4'S 2'E 15'W 15'N/TS 0'E/8'W 15'N/8'S 5'E/15'W 5' 20'N/2'S 2'E/20'W 20'N 20'S 16'E 18'W Clearwater Gardens Tree not on survey, on site property Inoculate, construction barrier Standard trim, devine Inoculate, construction barrier Standard trim, devine Inoculate, construction barrier Trim per ANSI standards Deadwood 1" and larger, elevate 12 ft, devine, root prune, inoculate and inject, mulch, construction barrier Tree not on survey, on site property Inoculate, construction barrier Inoculate, construction barrier Remove with building demolition ORIGINAL RECEIVED Remove ?e?V 0 9 2006 Leans NW, growing through fence Remove PLANNING DEPARTMENO Leans W, growing through fence CITY OF CLEARWATER Tree not on survey, on site property Inoculate, construction barrier Inoculate and inject, construction barrier Leans NW Crown clean deadwood 1" & larger, Inoculate, inject Mulch, temporary irrigation, Construction barrier 2 COMMON NAME DBH HEIGHT(APPROX) CANOPY N/S TAG BOTANICAL NAME CONDITION % SURVIVABILITY CANOPY E/W RECOMMENDATIONS 3567 Camphor 10" 45 ft 20'N / 12'S Remove with building demolition S Side Camphora officinalis 30% FAIR 12'E / T W 3568 Camphor 25" 55 ft 30'N / 32'S Not on property, neighbor's tree PRESERVE S Side Camphora officinalis 65% GOOD 25'E / 20'W Root prune if needed, inoculate, construction barrier 3569 Cabbage Palm 14, 20 ft 8' Not on property, neighbor's tree Sabal palmetto 75% GOOD Inoculate, construction barrier 3570 Laurel Oak 7" 30 ft 8'N / 12'S On property line. • Quercus laurifolia 75% GOOD 12'E / 8'W Inoculate, construction barrier 3571 Live Oak 21" 50 ft 28'N / 29'S Not on property, neighbor's tree Quercus virginiana 70% GOOD 22'E / 16'W Root prune, inoculate and inject, construction barrier 3572 Queen Palm 6" 20 ft 6' Not on property, neighbor's tree. Syagrus romanzoffiana 20% POOR Tree not on survey 3573 Cabbage Palm 16" 30 ft 7' On property line Saba/ palmetto 85% GOOD Standard prune, inoculate, construction barrier with cluster 3574 Cabbage Palm 14" 20 ft 8' On property line, Standard trim, clean trunk Sabal palmetto 60% GOOD Inoculate, construction barrier with cluster 3575 Cabbage Palm 16, 18 ft 8'N / 8'S On property line, Standard trim Sabal palmetto 60% GOOD 4'E / 8'W Inoculate, construction barrier with cluster 3576 Cabbage Palm 10" 15 ft 6' On property line, Standard trim E Side Sabal palmetto 50% GOOD Inoculate, construction barrier with cluster 3577 Cabbage Palm 13, 30 ft 4'N / 8'S Not on property, neighbor's tree Sabal palmetto 40% FAIR 8'E / 4'W Tree not on survey Leaning E, growing in Oak # 3554 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Clearwater Gardens 3 CITY OF CLEARWATE R Wes enberger Tree Service Inc. Certified Arborist & Tree Installation r"a 2030 58th Street N Clearwater, Florida 33760 (727) 535-9770 (727) 507-8733 (fax) E-Mail: info@wesaveyourtrees. com • Website: www wesoveyourtrees. com Insured BASIC PROTOCOL FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERFORM TREE INVENTORY. ASSIGN A NUMBER TO THE TREE. GIVE SPECIES, NAME, CONDITION OF TREE, CANOPY SPREAD, IDENTIFY SPECIMEN AND HAZARDOUS TREES. MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS. WORK WITH CITY ARBORIST AND PROJECT ENGINEER TO DEVELOP AN APPROVED TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. ALSO, APPLY FOR ANY AND ALL TREE RELATED PERMITS. 2. PERFORM RECOMMENDED/NECESSARY TRIMMING TO ACCOMMODATE CONSTRUCTION, BUILDINGS AND ROADS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE ANY VINES. INSTALL ANY MECHANICAL SUPPORT IF REQUIRED. HAND REMOVE ANY U19DERGROWTH AND UNWANTED TREES IN AREAS TO BE PROTECTED. 3. PROVIDE NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT TO TREES AND PERFORM ROOT PRUNING AND BARRIER, IF NEEDED. 4. INSTALL TEMPORARY IRRIGATION AND MULCH, IF NEEDED. 5. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION BARRIERS AROUND TREES TO BE PRESERVED. 6. PERFORM HEAVY EQUIPMENT REMOVAL OF UNWANTED/MITIGATED TREES. 7. PERFORM REGULAR MONITORING OF PRESERVED TREES. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 - PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 9 Loren Westenberger President Westenberger Tree Service Inc., and Broken Arrow Tree Farm 2030 58th Street North Clearwater, Florida 33760 727-535-9770 Summary: Thirty plus years experience in the green industry, specializing in Arboriculture with a very active involvement in related organizations promoting the preservation of Earth and its resources. Affiliations: International Society of Arboriculture, Florida Chapter (Founding member, Board of Directors, President 2000 and 2001, Certified Arborist) Florida Arborist Association, Tampa Bay Chapter (Founder, Charter member and Past President, 2 terms) International Champion Tree Project (Board of Directors) Florida Champion Tree Project (Vice President) Florida Urban Forestry Council (Board of Directors, Commercial Arborist Representative) Pinellas Urban Forestry Council (Founding Member) Friends of Florida Botanical Garden (Charter member & Advising Arborist and Vice President 1998-1999 - 2000) National Arborist Association, (Member) Certified Tree Growers Association, Florida (Vice President, First tree growers co-op in the world) Florida Nursery Growers Association Plant-It-2000, (Florida Coordinator, volunteer) Florida Native Plant Society (Member) National Arbor Day Foundation (Member) Landscape Maintenance Association (LMA) (Member) Enviro-Net (a coalition of environmental groups) (Chairman 1999 - 2000) Florida Association of Environmental Professionals (FAEP), (Member) The Nature Conservancy (Member) Sierra Club (Member) Pinellas Technical Education Center, PTEC, Horticulture Department (Adjunct Instructor and Board Member) University of Florida Extension Services, Pinellas County (Adjunct Instructor) International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist Examination (Instructor and Proctor) International Tree Climbing Championship (Certified Judge) Loren Westenberger, page 2 Specialized Continuing Education Certified Arborist, SO-334 (International Society ofArboriculture) Registered Nursery Tree Grader (International Society of Arboriculture) Roadside Vegetation Management Specialist (International Society of Arboriculture) Master Tree Farmer (University of Florida, Extension) Tree Short Course (University of Florida, Extension) Tree Biology & Tree Care (PTEC) Tree & Landscape Workshop (University of Florida, Extension) Tree Appraisal Workshop (American Society of Consulting Arborists) Hazardous Tree Workshop (University of Florida, Extension) Recent Conferences Hazard Tree Workshop (Tampa, 2005) Trees, People, and the Law Seminar (Tampa, 2005) Trees Florida, International Society of Arboriculture (2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999) Florida Outdoor Advertisers Association, (West Palm Beach, 2002) Great Southern Tree Conference, (Gainesville, 2005, 2003, 2002, 2001) The Care of Trees, National Arborist Association (2003, 2002, 2000) Florida's Great Neighborhood, (Tampa, 2002) Earth Charter Summit, (St. Petersburg, 2002) Awards Outstanding Professional, 2005 (Urban Forestry Counsel) Steward of the Environment, 2004 (Green Thumb Festival, St. Petersburg, Florida) Barred Owl, 2002 (Sierra Club, Florida) Keep Pinellas County Beautiful Award, 1999 (Pinellas County, Florida) Guinness Book of World Records, 1998, (World's largest living tree transplant, Quercus virginiana) Outstanding Arborist of the Year, 1998 (International Society of Arboriculture) President's Award of Honor, 1997 (International Society ofArboriculture) Spiw 6/30/2006 _ Receipt #: 1200600000000006730 10:25:25AM ->r ?= Date: 06/30/2006 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-06041 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid 0 Check TEZARIS AND BIEBER HOMES R_D 5026 LLC In Person Payment Total: 1,205.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 $1,205.00 cReceipt.ipt r Kati Fire Condition Conditions Associated With FLD2006-06041 601 N FT HARRISON AVE James Keller 562-4327 x3062 09/21/2006 Provide Fire Flow Calculations PRIOR TO CDB . Not Met 09/21/2006 This is a 4 story building and will require a 1,000 GPM Fire Pump. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Not Met 09/21/2006 Fire Department Connections must be on seperate lines to Fire Pump. Acknowledge PRIOR TO Not Met CDB 07/21/2006 FDC is required to be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Not Met Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve.FDC to be on front side of the project.Add an additional hydrant one for fire fighting and one for the F.D.C. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 9/21/2006 Letter of September 5, 2006 did not show where the double check valve to the fire line for the fire pump is located (JFK) Harbor Master Condition No comments Not Met Landscape Robert Tefft 562-4539 10/,112006 The landscape plan is denoted as being at 1:10 scale; however it has not been prepared at such a Not Met scale. Further, the landscape plan is inconsistent with the site plan. Revise the landscape plan accordingly. 10/13/2006 The proposed transformer, fire hydrant and F.D.C are not depicted on the landscape plan. The Not Met proposed locations of these items will be in conflict with the landscaping proposed. Revise the landscape plan and/or site/utility plans accordingly. Legal Condition No comments Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 Not Met 07/20/2006 7/20/06-The proposed plans do not take tree preservation into consideration. ALL of the trees Not Met have severe impacts as the garage and clubhouse footer systems effectivly remove the trees. The two large oak trees did not recieve any consideration for preservation. Suggest that the arborist's recommendation be adhered to. 9/19/06-Address the impacts to all of the trees along the property lines. If removal is required adjacent property owners must be notified and possible replacements required. Consult with your arborist prior to CDB if preservation is considered. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 09/19/2006 9/19/06 - Site data table has been corrected. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to Not Met issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to reflect the square footage of the existing building. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Zoning Condition Robert Tefft 562-4539 Print Date: 10/19/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 4 r 0 FLD2006-06041 ur Zoning Condition 601 N FT HARRISON AVE Robert Tefft 562-4539 07/26/06 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, open Not Met ?' spaces should function as transitions between the public sidewalks and streets and the use of the property. Further, such open spaces should be visible and inviting to the pedestrian. The proposed open space in front of the property does not meet these Guidelines. UPDATE 09/06/06: The open space at the front of the property has not been designed so as to be inviting to the pedestrian - it's completely landscaped with no hardscaping to achieve any level of interaction. UPDATE 10-13-06: The response provided is that "boardwalk hardscaping could probably be added to the open space ... to be inviting to pedestrians"; however no such hardscaping has actually be added. Thus, the project still does not comply with this provision. 073 1 006 The survey depicts the existance of wood and chain link fences along the north and east property Not Met lines - is any fence proposed to replace these? UPDATE 09/06/06: Clarify what is occuring at the northeast corner of the property. The fencing and buildings would appear to prevent access to this area. UPDATE 10-13-06: The response provided was that "the fencing ... will be adjusted so as not to prevent access"; however the fencing has not been adjusted and access is still prevented. 07/2006 With regard to the Public Amenities Incentive Pool request for two (2) dwelling units, the Not Met application needs to be more specific to those amenities being proposed. Please be advised that those amenities eligible to be used are specifically listed within the Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan located within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan (ref: pg. 215). UPDATE 09/06/06: No response was provided to this comment. UPDATE 10-13-06: While a sufficient response has been provided, it has been done on the response letter and not by revising the Public Amenities Incentive Pool application. Submit a _ revised application. (07/2006 How do vehicles egress from the proposed garages? It would not appear that adequate room Not Met exists for a vehicle leaving either of the end garages. Also, what accommodations would be made for an unit owner who possessed a vehicle that could not fit inside one of the garages? UPDATE 09/06/06: The above issues have not been addressed with the revisions. " UPDATE 10-13-06: The garage cross-section provided accommodates a vehicle depth of only 16-0", which does not meet the minimum standard for an off-street parking space. 7/26/2006 The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #6 needs to include additional Not Met information as to why the project has been designed with the refuse area located adjacent to a residential use. UPDATE 09/06/06: The revised response addresses the existing use and the adjacent use to the north, but not how the proposed use has been designed to minimize adverse effects on adjacent properties. -Mr-_ VeSP 1S -nib 2 as ,a?o??v? -?1 crow ivd rt ta. as "*.r - 1JCL. UPDATE 10-13-06: The response letter provides only an answer to the issue raised in the above update and not a fully revised reponse to the applicable criterion. Further, the revision has not been made as part of the application, but within a response letter. X071?01&6 Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, within the Old Bay District, those Print Date: 10/19/2006 Page 2 of 4 Not Met CaseConditons • FLD2006-06041 •f 601 N FT HARRISON AVE Zoning Condition Robert Tefft 562-4539 properties east of Osceola Avenue have a maximum height of 40 feet. Further, pursuant to Section 8-102 of the Community Development Code, height is defined as the vertical distance from the mean elevation of existing grade to the highest finished roof surface in the case of a building with a flat roof. The height of the proposed building is being measured from finished floor and to the median of the flat roof, both of which are inconsistent with the Code. Thus, the building appears to be taller than permissable. The aforementioned height definition also states that elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height and that parapet walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs shall be permitted to extend not higher than 42 inches over maximum height in the district. The proposed elevator equipment room exceeds the allowable maximum and no provision exists to allow the stairs to reach their proposed height. Further, the parapet is 7 feet tall at its highest point, which exceeds the above referenced maximum. Additionally, the amenities depicted on the roof plan (A1.3) do not appear on the elevations and the spa and gazebos both exceed the maximum height allowable and will need to be removed. UPDATE 09/06/06: While the majority of the above comment has been addressed, the spas are still proposed and will exceed the allowable height. UPDATE 10-13-06: The response to the above states that "the proposed spas will extend above the parapet walls". The proposed spas may NOT extend above the parapet walls. Revise the architectural elevations to clearly depict the height of the spas NOT exceeding the height of the parapet. 07/? 92006 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, seperation Not Met between buildings should provide for useable space such as an alley or another open space compliant with these Design Guidelines. UPDATE 09/06/06: The revised plans have shifted the building and created a three foot (T) open space along the south property line. How is this open space compliant with the Design Guidelines? UPDATE 10-13-06: The response provided to the above states that "climbing vines can be planted on the south building elevation"; however the plans have not been revised to actually proposed climbing vines on the south building elevation. 07/ 2006 The proposed utility plan (C4.1) depicts the water, sewer and fire lines; however the plan depicts Not Met nothing as far as electrical is concerned despite the presence of overhead power lines at the east side of the property. UPDATE 09/06/06: This comment has not been addressed. UPDATE 10-13-06: The reponse provided states that the utilities will be brought undergroud; however a note to this effect needs to be provided on the plans. 09000 06 In the response provided for General Applicability Criterion #1 you state that a "friendly pedestrian Not Met sitting area in front of the lot" has been provided and also that lush landscaping is provided in the back of the lot. Please clarify where these items are. UPDATE 10-13-06: The responses provided still do not address the location of the "friendly pedestrian sitting area in front of the lot". Please identify the location of this area or revise the response to the aforementioned criterion. Print Date: 10/19/2006 CaseConditons Page 3 of 4 P • FLD2006-06041 601 N FT HARRISON AVE Zoning Condition Robert Tefft 562-4539 07/26/ 06 Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, all utilities, including individual Not Met distribution lines, shall be installed underground at the time of development. UPDATE 09/06/06: This comment has not been addressed. At minimum, provide a notation such effect on the utility plan. UPDATE 10-13-06: The response letter states that a notation has been made on the plan; however no such notation can be found on the utility plan. ,07 2/ 6/200 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings Not Met shall maintain the build-to line or the setback of the developments block and the block across the street. Buildings should be located farther from the build-to line when done to provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian oriented design features which maintain the build-to line. UPDATE 09/06/06: No information has been provided as to the build-to line established by those adjacent developments or how the subject proposal is consistent with that build-to line. ttoR??.?6>? TC UPDATE 10-13-06: The response provided states that "the proposed build-to line is in line with both adjacent properties"; however this does not appear to be accurate. The existing adjacent building to the south is set back approximately 20 feet, while your proposed building is set back in excess of 40 feet nearest the south property line. 0 /2006I No response has been provided for Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project Criterion #6.d. '- Also, the responses provided for 6.a and b do not state how compliance has been achieved. UPDATE 10-13-06: The response letter states that we are to review an attached "Written Submittal Requirements: Additional"; however no such document was provided with the resubmittal. * 1-10 e515476"IF- %101t%M > *k -071 6/2006 The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion #4 does not address how the elimination of cross access to the adjacent property to the south will not result in a detriment to said property. UPDATE 09/06/06: The elimination of the cross-access to the property to the south has not been F addressed. Wa UPDATE 10-13-06: The response letter provides only an answer to the issue raised in the above update and not a fully revised reponse to the applicable criterion. The revision should be made as part of the application, not as part of a response letter. Not Met Not Met 07/26/2006 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, visible, Not Met permanent or roll-down security bars/gates are inappropriate within the downtown. The proposed wrought iron gates must be eliminated. UPDATE 09/06/06: The security gates are still depicted on the plans and will need to be removed. UPDATE 10-13-06: As per previously discussions, it is understood that the security gates remain an issue (i.e. that they will need to be removed), but that you have requested that they remain on the plans for Board discussion. ?I tir 6?P 47:0 0W' f:tt IS tf-1 tFa ILI 17AP6550 Print Date: 10/19/2006 CaseConditons Page 4 of 4 0 a 0 Engineers - Planners Project Managers Schlotter & Associates October 12, 2006 Mr. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III CITY OF CLEARWATER Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 tel: (727) 562-44604 fax: (727) 562-4865 robert.tefft@myclea rwater. com Re: Response to DRC Agenda, Thursday, October 05, 2006 FLD2006-06041 (601 North Fort Harrison Avenue) Clearwater Gardens Condominiums Dear Mr. Tefft; ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER This transmittal letter and attachments is to submit additional information responding to the subject DRC comments. General Engineering Comments: The Site Development Plans has been revised to include and conform to all of the items requested by the engineering department, the Building Permit and Certificate of Occupancy requirement notes are acknowledged. Environmental Comments: The Dry Detention pond grassed bottom and side slopes do not exceed a maximum slope of 4:1 and is shown on the cross-section plan sheet C3.2,. Vertical walls have been revised for the detention pond on two sides only, as requested. The elevation of this property is relatively high and depth of the pond works, given the seasonal high water table elevation and the excellent percolation rate. The proposed detention pond will be landscaped and the wall will be finished in character with the building and will be attractive. The detention pond will be accessible from the street and will also be a pedestrian feature. Without approval of the proposed detention pond, the proposed redevelopment plan would not be feasible. P.O. Box 3256, Holiday, Florida 34690-0256 (727) 372-9256 Voice (727) 372-4586 FAX 0 FLD2006-06041.(601 N. Fort Harrison Ave.) Response to DRC Agenda Oct. 12, 2006, Page 2 of 4 ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Fire Comments: The Fire Flow Calculations were previously submitted and accepted. A 1,000 GPM Fire Pump with a double check valve has been added to the fire-line. FDC's and Fire Hydrants have been added to the Utilities Plan and are located at both the front and rear of the building for fire fighting. It is acknowledged that water-mains, hydrants and a hard road surface shall be completed and in service prior to construction and required standpipe systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Harbor Master Comments: No Comments Land Resource Comments: It is not feasible to save the 42 inch oak tree on this property. The developer has offered inch for inch replacement for the necessary tree removals and also mitigation compensation, in addition. Revised landscaped plans are submitted herewith and the tree replacement table has been updated accordingly. Landscaping Comments: The Landscape designer, (Margaret Moore) has revised plans to address the review comments and has prepared a separate response letter, which is attached to this transmittal letter for review. Parks and Recreation: The Site Data table has been corrected and reflects the square footage of the existing building. The developer has contacted Art Kader to determine open space/recreation impact fees prior to building permit issuance. Stormwater Comments: Prior to Building Permit issuance a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit will be provided and construction plans will clearly show that the down- spouts are directed to the detention pond. More detailed site grading will be provided on the construction Site Plan. Solid Waste Comments: The dumpster enclosure details have been revised to City specifications. The under-building drive-thru clearance has been clearly dimensioned to depict a clearance height of fifteen (15) feet. Traffic Engineering Comments: The drives at both ends of the parking garages have been redesigned to make backing-out easier. General Note(s) 1) and 2) are acknowledged and accepted. Planning Comments: 1. Boardwalk hard-scaping could probably be added to the open space in front of the property so as to be inviting to pedestrians. F/ 0 FLD2006-06041 (601 N. Fort Harrison Ave Response to DRC Agenda Oct. 12, 2006 Page 3 of 4 ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 2. The fencing at the northeast corner of the building will be adjusted so as to not prevent access to this area. 3. We attempted to follow the Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan to the letter. The proposed Public Amenities are: Sidewalk Pavers, Benches, Lighting, Trash Cans, Medjool Palm Trees in addition to lush landscaping and as mentioned above boardwalk hardscaping could be added. Please advise if any required amenities need to be added. 4. A garage cross-section has been added to the plans shows how the stack garage looks. The inside garage dimension will be 9'-4" 18'-8" 5. The dumpster location was determined in cooperation with the solid waste department and is situated at their preferred site for best access. 6. The building height dimensions have been more clearly depicted on the elevations and the proposed spas will extend above the parapet walls. 7. The proposed three (3) foot open space along the south property line is for building maintenance. Creation of an alley-way or usable space is not feasible. Climbing vines can be planted on the south building elevation to soften the appearance. 8. The encroachment of the north clubhouse eave has been shifted to eliminate the over- hang. 9. A rear elevation of the garages has now been proved in the revised plans. 10. See attached document "Written Submittal Requirements: Additional" (Comprehensive In-fill Redevelopment Project Criteria). 11. The north and south parapet walls have been revised to be level, as requested. 12. An electrical transformer location has been added to the island at the rear of the building. Wall pack lighting will be added to the building for outdoor and night lighting. The existing over-head power lines and poles will be relocated underground. 13. The landscaping provided at the back of the lot is for residents and their guests only and not open to the public. 14. It is understood that all utilities including individual distribution lines, shall be installed underground at the time of development and the notation has been added to the utility plan. FLD2006-06041 (601 N. Fort Harrison Ave.) Response to DRC Agenda Oct. 12, 2006 Page 4 of 4 15. The proposed build-to line is in line with both adjacent properties. 16. See attached document "Written Submittal Requirements: Additional" (Comprehensive In-fill Redevelopment Project Criteria). 17. The floor plan scales on the drawings have been corrected to 1/16" = 1'4'. 18. See attached document "Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 05, 2006", (With Applicant's Response). 19. See attached document "Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 05, 2006", (With Applicant's Response). Revised Site Development Plans and Development Review Agenda Responses are resubmitted with this transmittal letter and address Planning Department Review Comments. Please advise if any additional information or clarification is needed prior to CDB. It is anticipated that the application will be deemed sufficient for this proposed development and that the project approval can move forward and be scheduled for the next CDB meeting. Fifteen (15) sets of revised plans and requested submittals addressing the subject DRC Agenda Comments are herewith submitted before noon, October 12, 2006. Please advise if any additional information is needed prior to scheduling the next review meeting and we will respond immediately. Your assistance with this project is greatly appreciated. *?,? Resp?off?" aublt' SC L3R'AS.?Cf?TS Cl? ' e of Au of+za?ic?nxlo. 3811 / V) Jn - :,2., F• ScFott4 P al` F .?eNnZT LiCJ1 *.=' - D45 att. •` .r4`e#ent Plans, revised Lafittscapb Mans, revised Color Marketing Renderings, updated Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 05, 2006, (with Applicant's Response) Written Submittal Requirements: Additional (Comprehensive In-fill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CAS&MCGCORC Responset.doc a ? 10:15 am Case Number: FLD2006-06041 - 601 N FT HARRISON AVE TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions L 4965 W Breeze Cir Palm Harbor, F134683 Owner(s): Frank C Schlotter 6885 Copperfield Drive New Port Richey, F1346 TELEPHONE: 727-372-9256, FAX: 727-372-4586, E-MAIL: schlotter0l@msn.com Applicant Location: 0.652 acres along the east side of North Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately 000 feet south of Eldridge Street. Atlas Page: 277B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development application to permit 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Association(s): Bayview Heights TELEPHONE: 443-2550, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Clearwater, F133755 625 Ninnesota Drive Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 Neighborhood Association(s): Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood TELEPHONE: 461-0564, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: southem@mmpabay.rr.com Clearwater, F133767 1828 Venetian Point Drive Neighborhood Association(s): North Greenwood Association, Inc. TELEPHONE: 560-4382, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: WADENWADE@AOL.COM Clearwater, F133755 1201 Douglas Road Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner 19 Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering. ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2@06 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 13 Prior to CDB the following issues shall be addressed: 1. Sheet C4.3 - replace Trench Bacldill Detail with City Index #104. 2. Revise Utility Plan to show Double Detector Check Valve Assembly back1low prevention device for fire line in right-of-way or in easement dedicated by the Condo Plat. 3. Revise Utility Plan to show fire line to buildings. 4. Indicate on the Utility Plan that Fire Department Connection shall be located no greater than 40-feet from a Fire Hydrant Assembly and greater than 15-feet from the building. Prior to building permit: 1. Revise Utility Plan to show Street Lateral clean-out in driveway. 2. Add City Brick Paver Header detail 116 to plans for brick paver crosswalk through driveway. 3. Brick paver sidewalk will be subject to separate right-of-way permit. ACKNOWLEDGED 4. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Replace sidewalk detail on page C2.3 with city index #109. ACKNOWLEDGED 5. New dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. Replace dumpster detail on page C2.3 with City Index #701. ACKNOWLEDGED Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Condominium Plat shall be recorded for this development. ACKNOWLEDGED 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Public Works/Engineering will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1. Dry Detention systems shall be designed with a grassed bottom and side slopes no steeper than 4:1. 2. In accordance with the City Storm Drainage Design Criteria, Page 7: In no circumstance will vertical walls be permitted adjacent to rights-of- way, along the boundaries of adjacent parcels of land, or on more than two sides of the pond. Hardship reasoning acceptable, however, please revise to include only two sides of the pond with vertical walls (not adjacent to rights-of- way or the property land owner to the south). Fire: 1. Provide Fire Flow Calculations PRIOR TO DRC This is a 4 story building and will require a 1,000 GPM Fire Pump. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2. Fire Department Connections must be on seperate lines to Fire Pump. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 3. FDC is required to be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve.FDC to be on front side of the project.Add an additional hydrant one for fire fighting and one for the F.D.C. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 9/21/2006 Letter of September 5, 2006 did not show where the double check valve to the fire line for the fire pump is located (JFK) 4. FDC is required to be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of i ORIGINAL double detector check valve.FDC to be on front side of the project.Add an add tional hydrant one for fire fighting and one for the F.D.C. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB RECEIVED 9/21/2006 Letter of September 5, 2006 did not show where the double check valve to the fire line for the fire pump is located (JFK) OCT 12 2006 Harbor Master: 1. No comments PLANNING DEPARTMENT Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 14 CITY OF CLEARWATER U Legal: No comments 0 Land Resources: 1. Revise the replacement calculations. Palm trees with 10' of clear trunk receive a 1" deficit if removed and a 1" credit if proposed and accent trees receive a 2" deficit if removed and a 2" credit if proposed, medjool palms receive 2.5" credit per tree. Also, hibiscus is not a tree and the loblolly bay is know to grow in bay heads and probably will not grow on this site. Revise calculation prior to CDB. 2. 7/20/06-The proposed plans do not take tree preservation into consideration. ALL of the trees have severe impacts as the garage and clubhouse footer systems effectivly remove the trees. The two large oak trees did not recieve any consideration for preservation. Suggest that the arborist's recommendation be adhered to. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 10/5/06: As per our last DRC meeting on August 3, 2006, we agreed that we would do two things with the Land Resources department. One was that we would replace the inches of trees removed, including the two Oak trees, and the second was that we financially contribute to a fund based on the inches removed. We also said that we need to calculate this amount and put the agreement in writing. 9/19/06-Address the impacts to all of the trees along the property lines. If removal is required adjacent property owners must be notified and possible replacements required. Consult with your arborist prior to CDB if preservation is considered. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 10/5/06: As per our last DRC meeting on August 3, 2006, we agreed that we would contact the adjacent owners and work out a satisfactory solution for the trees that may need to be removed. Once this is worked out we will inform the Land Resources department of the details. Landscaping. 1. Several proposed plant materials with differing quantities and/or specifications have been listed in the materials table with the same key (SR, CJ, PMX and TJ). Provide differing keys to eliminate potential confusion/conflicts regarding these materials. UPDATE 09/06/06: The majority of issues regarding the above comment have been addressed; however there are two sizes of Confederate Jasmine proposed (3 gal. and 15 gal.) and both are identified on the plan as TJ. Please revise the landscape plan to clearly differentiate between the two sizes. 2. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.I of the Community Development Code, shrubs shall constitute 50% of the required interior landscape area. As proposed, the development may meet this requirement; however further information needs to be provided to clarify this issue. UPDATE 09/06/06: The response provided to the above comment stated that shrubs will constitute 50% of the required landscape. The shrubs must constitute at least 50% of the required INTERIOR landscape. Please provide a notation as such on the landscape plan. Parks and Recreation: 1. 9/19/06 - Site data table has been corrected. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to reflect the square footage of the existing building. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 10/5/06: On August 23,2006 I spoke with Debbie Reid and received the Assessment of Open Space/Recreation Impact fee. Stormwater: ORIGINAL 1. The following to be addressed prior to building permit. RECEIVED 1. Provide a copy of approved SWFWMD permit. 2. Clearly show that the condominium downspouts are being directed to the retention pond. OCT 2l:?U6 3. Provide more detailed site grading. I U Solid Waste: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be to City specifications and shown on detail. At least 14 CITY OF CLEARWATER feet clearance under building for entrance to rear. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 15 a • APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 1015106: The clearance under the building is 15' high as per drawings and request from Solid Waste and Fire departments. Traffic Engineering: 1. Vehicles parked at both ends of the parking garage will have a difficult time backing out. Suggest redesign to make backing out easier. The above condition to be addressed prior to a CDB hearing. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O. ). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forth coming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: 1. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, open spaces should function as transitions between the public sidewalks and streets and the use of the property. Further, such open spaces should be visible and inviting to the pedestrian. The proposed open space in front of the property does not meet these Guidelines. UPDATE 09/06/06: The open space at the front of the property has not been designed so as to be inviting to the pedestrian - it's completely landscaped with no hardscaping to achieve any level of interaction. 2. The survey depicts the existance of wood and chain link fences along the north and east property lines - is any fence proposed to replace these? UPDATE 09/06/06: Clarify what is occuring at the northeast comer of the property. The fencing and buildings would appear to prevent access to this area. 3. With regard to the Public Amenities Incentive Pool request for two (2) dwelling units, the application needs to be more specific to those amenities being proposed. Please be advised that those amenities eligible to be used are specifically listed within the Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan located within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan (ref: pg. 215). UPDATE 09/06/06: No response was provided to this comment. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 1015106: From the Public Amenities Incentives Pool, the eligible Amenities for density/intensity bonuses proposed are: • "Residential uses in the Downtown Plan area:" We are replacing a non-desired automobile service, busy car wash, with residential units. • "Significant Public Space on Site:" We are providing two areas on our property adjoing the public side walk which will have public benches for pedestrians to sit and relax, expensive medjool palms with shade over the benches. • "Contribute to Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan:" We are contributing to the Master Streetscape plan by adding streetscaping as per plan. This will include: • Street pavers on the side-walk and drive way into the property. • Street benches on the side walk. ¦ Replacement of the front property fence with beautiful landscaping in front of the benches. • Very expensive and beautiful medjool palms in front of the property which will also add shade to the benches. 4. How do vehicles egress from the proposed garages? It would not appear that adequate room exists for a vehicle leaving either of the end garages. Also, what accommodations would be made for an unit owner who possessed a vehicle that could not fit inside one of the garages? UPDATE 09/06/06: The above issues have not been addressed with the revisions. ORIGINAL The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #6 needs to include additional RECEIVED information as to why the project has been designed with the refuse area located adjacent to a residential use. 106 UPDATE 09/06/06: The revised response addresses the existing use and the adjacent use to the OCT 12 2n north, but not how the proposed use has been designed to minimize adverse effects on adjacent properties. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 -Page 16 a • Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, within the Old Bay District, those properties east of Osceola Avenue have a maximum height of 40 feet. Further, pursuant to Section 8-102 of the Community Development Code, height is defined as the vertical distance from the mean elevation of existing grade to the highest finished roof surface in the case of a building with a flat roof. The height of the proposed building is being measured from finished floor and to the median of the flat roof, both of which are inconsistent with the Code. Thus, the building appears to be taller than permissable. The aforementioned height definition also states that elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height and that parapet walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs shall be permitted to extend not higher than 42 inches over maximum height in the district. The proposed elevator equipment room exceeds the allowable maximum and no provision exists to allow the stairs to reach their proposed height. Further, the parapet is 7 feet tall at its highest point, which exceeds the above referenced maximum. Additionally, the amenities depicted on the roof plan (A1.3) do not appear on the elevations and the spa and gazebos both exceed the maximum height allowable and will need to be removed. UPDATE 09/06/06: While the majority of the above comment has been addressed, the spas are still proposed and will exceed the allowable height 7. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, seperation between buildings should provide for useable space such as an alley or another open space compliant with these Design Guidelines. UPDATE 09/06/06: The revised plans have shifted the building and created a three foot (3') open space along the south property line. How is this open space compliant with the Design Guidelines? 8. The eave of the stair tower on the south side of the building will encroach onto the abutting property. Also, the eave on the north side of the clubhouse will encroach onto the abutting property to the north. UPDATE 09/06/06: The encroachment of the north clubhouse cave has not been addressed. 9. Provide an elevation for the rear (east) of the garages. UPDATE 09/06/06: A rear elevation of the garages has not been provided. 10. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion #2 does not address how the project is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan or the other items outlined in the criterion. UPDATE 09/06/06: While substantial information has been provide with regard to the Design Guidelines, the revised response does not address the Comprehensive Plan. 11. It is understood that the flat roof needs to have a slope so as to accommodate drainage; however can the outer walls/parapet along the north and south sides of the building be designed so as to not reflect this slope? 12. The proposed utility plan (C4.1) depicts the water, sewer and fire lines; however the plan depicts nothing as far as electrical is concerned despite the presence of overhead power lines at the east side of the property. UPDATE 09/06/06: This comment has not been addressed. 13. In the response provided for General Applicability Criterion #1 you state that a "friendly pedestrian sitting area in front of the lot" has been provided and also that lush landscaping is provided in the back of the lot. Please clarify where these items are. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 1015106: There seems to be a misunderstanding. The o? place that will be created as described is in the front of the lot. 14. Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, shall be installed underground at the time of development. UPDATE 09/06/06: This comment has not been addressed. At minimum, provide a notation such effect on the utility plan. 15. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings shall maintain the build-to line or the setback of the developments block and the block across the street Buildings should be located farther from the build-to line when done to provide a ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER a 0 courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian oriented design features which maintain the build-to line. Other: UPDATE 09/06/06: No information has been provided as to the build-to line established by those adjacent developments or how the subject proposal is consistent with that build-to line. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 1015106: We will build 3 feet inside our lot in order to leave enough space for future maintenance. This space will have beautiful climbing vines as discussed in our DRC meeting on 10/5/06. 16. No response has been provided for Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project Criterion #6.d. Also, the responses provided for 6.a and b do not state how compliance has been achieved. 17. The floor plans are denoted as being at a scale of 1/8" = 1'-0'; however the plans are not at said scale. 18. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion #4 does not address how the elimination of cross access to the adjacent property to the south will not result in a detriment to said property. UPDATE 09/06/06: The elimination of the cross-access to the property to the south has not been addressed. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 10/5/06: A search by Pappas Title Company confirmed that the proposed easement on the original survey was never filed by the previous owner of the car wash or the owner of the adjacent south side property. There are no garages in the back of the adjacent south side property. There is only a broken down shack. I spoke with the owner and his property manager and both said "they did not need access to the back of the property through our property." They are ok with our proposed plan and hope that their property values will go up due to our development. 19. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, visible, permanent or roll-down security barstgates are inappropriate within the downtown. The proposed wrought iron gates must be eliminated. UPDATE 09/06/06: The security gates are still depicted on the plans and will need to be removed. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE 1015106: We would like to keep the gates in the front of the property in order to have the required security for the new tenants. The current neighborhood is a high crime area with prostitutes, drug dealers/users and other criminals. We cannot sell our units without the ability for residents to feel secure. Additionally, a Police captain of Pinellas county recommended gates on this property given the high crime in the area. We would like to keep the gates open and not easily visible during the daylight hours. This can be a good compromise because during the day the gates would not be visible and it would not create any traffic issues when people drive up to the entrance. The gates will be closed at night for tenant security and opened early in the morning. The success of this project on N Fort Harrison in the Old Bay District will get the ball rolling for similar project and help realize the Goals of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan No Comments Notes: The application can be deemed sufficient subject to the attached conditions being addressed with 15 sets of revised plans to be submitted by Noon, October 12, 2006. ORIGINAL. RECEIVED OCT 1.2 2M PLANNOF C A CIZ`( IEARWA ER 10/09/2006 • 12:42 7273761201 M MOORE LPD Margaret ,Moore Landscape Planning and Design PAGE 01 Award Winning Commercial • Residential 7X7 (M) 376-0205 Response to: City of Clearwater, Development Review Agenda, Comments, Thursday, October 5'", 2006 Re: CLEARWATER GARDENS LANDSCAPING PLAN Date: October 9`", 2006 Your comment # Land Resources: 1. The replacement calculations have been revised. Please see sheet LS 1 of 2. Landscaping: 1. TJ is now "TT' for 3 gal. and "TJX" for 7 gal. SR is now "SR" for 10' . and "SRX" for 14' 2. Notation has been added to landscape plan stating "shrubs constitute at least 50% of required interior landscaping." If you have any questions, I can be reached on cell, 727-514-1132 or Office, 727-376- 0205. Sincerely, 6&t Margaret Moore E-mail: Margaret.i.moore@gte.net ORIGINAL RECEIVED OCT 12 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 8036 Brown Pelican Avenue - New Port Richey, Florida 34653 V): 15 am Case Number: FLD2006-0*-- 601 N FT HARRISON AVE . Owner(s): Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions L 4965 W Breeze Cir Palm Harbor, Fl 34683 4 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Frank C Schlotter 6885 Copperfield Drive New Port Richey, F] 346 TELEPHONE: 727-372-9256, FAX: 727-372-4586,E-MAIL: schlotter0l@msn.com Location: 0.652 acres along the east side of North Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately 000 feet south of Eldridge Street. Atlas Page: 277B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development application to permit 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Bayview Heights Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33755 625 Ninnesota Drive TELEPHONE: 443-2550, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461-0564, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: southern@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33755 1201 Douglas Road TELEPHONE: 560-4382, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: WADENWADE@AOL.COM Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 13 1 . Prior to CDB the wing issues shall be addressed: 1. Sheet C4.3 - replace Trench Backfill Detail with City Index #104. 2. Revise Utility Plan to show Double Detector Check Valve Assembly backflow prevention device for fire line in right-of-way or in easement dedicated by the Condo Plat. i 3. Revise Utility Plan to show fire line to buildings. 4. Indicate on the Utility Plan that Fire Department Connection shall be located no greater than 40-feet from a Fire Hydrant Assembly and greater than 15-feet.from the building. Prior to building permit: 1. Revise Utility Plan to show Street Lateral clean-out in driveway. 2. Add City Brick Paver Header detail 116 to plans for brick paver crosswalk through driveway. 3. Brick paver sidewalk will be subject to separate right-of-way permit. ACKNOWLEDGED 4. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Replace sidewalk detail on page C2.3 with city index #109. ACKNOWLEDGED 5. New dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6'-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. Replace dumpster detail on page C2.3 with City Index #701. ACKNOWLEDGED Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 1. Condominium Plat shall be recorded for this development. ACKNOWLEDGED 2. Applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida. Public Works/Engineering will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Dry Detention systems shall be designed with a grassed bottom and side slopes no steeper than 4:1. 2. In accordance with the City Storm Drainage Design Criteria, Page 7: In no circumstance will vertical walls be permitted adjacent to rights-of- way, along the boundaries of adjacent parcels of land, or on more than two sides of the pond. Hardship reasoning acceptable, however, please revise to include only two sides of the pond with vertical walls (not adjacent to rights-of- way or the property land owner to the south). Fire: Provide Fire Flow Calculations PRIOR TO DRC 2. This is a 4 story building and will require a 1,000 GPM Fire Pump. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 3 . Fire Department Connections must be on seperate lines to Fire Pump. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 4. FDC is required to be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve.FDC to be on front side of the project.Add an additional hydrant one for fire fighting and one for the F.D.C. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB 9/21/2006 Letter of September 5, 2006 did not show where the double check valve to the fire line for the fire pump is located (JFK) Harbor Master: 1 . No comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 14 Legal: • • 1 No comments Land Resources: I . Revise the replacement calculations. Palm trees with 10' of clear trunk receive a I" deficit if removed and a 1 " credit if proposed and accent trees receive a 2" deficit if removed and a 2" credit if proposed, medjool palms receive 2.5" credit per tree. Also, hibiscus is not a tree and the loblolly bay is know to grow in bay heads and probably will not grow on this site. Revise calculation prior to CDB. 2. 7/20/06-The proposed plans do not take tree preservation into consideration. ALL of the trees have severe impacts as the garage and clubhouse footer systems effectivly remove the trees. The two large oak trees did not recieve any consideration for preservation. Suggest that the arborist's recommendation be adhered to. 9/19/06-Address the impacts to all of the trees along the property lines. If removal is required adjacent property owners must be notified and possible replacements required. Consult with your arborist prior to CDB if preservation is considered. Landscaping: Several proposed plant materials with differing quantities and/or specifications have been listed in the materials table with the same key (SR, CJ, PMX and TJ). Provide differing keys to eliminate potential confusion/conflicts regarding these materials. UPDATE 09/06/06: The majority of issues regarding the above comment have been addressed; however there are two sizes of Confederate Jasmine proposed (3 gal. and 15 gal.) and both are identified on the plan as TJ. Please revise the landscape plan to clearly differentiate between the two sizes. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1 of the Community Development Code, shrubs shall constitute 50% of the required interior landscape area. As proposed, the development may meet this requirement; however further information needs to be provided to clarify this issue. UPDATE 09/06/06: The response provided to the above comment stated that shrubs will constitute 50% of the required landscape. The shrubs must constitute at least 50% of the required INTERIOR landscape. Please provide a notation as such on the landscape plan. Parks and Recreation: 1 . 9/19/06 - Site data table has been corrected. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Site data table needs to reflect the square footage of the existing building- Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: I _ The following to be addressed prior to building permit. 1. Provide a copy of approved SWFWMD permit. 2. Clearly show that the condominium downspouts are being directed to the retention pond. 3. Provide more detailed site grading. Solid Waste: I . That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be to City specifications and shown on detail. At least 14 feet clearance under building for entrance to rear. Traffic Engineering: I . Vehicles parked at both ends of the parking garage will have a difficult time backing out. Suggest redesign to make backing out easier. The above condition.to be addressed prior to a CDB hearing. General Note(s): I) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 15 Planning: 0 • I Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, open spaces should function as transitions between the public sidewalks and streets and the use of the property. Further, such open spaces should be visible and inviting to the pedestrian. The proposed open space in front of the property does not meet these Guidelines. -DATE 0 /06/06: The open space at the front of the property has not been designed so as to be invrtrng the pedestrian - it's completely landscaped with no hardscaping to achieve any level of /? interaction. t(2 ; The survey depicts the existance of wood and chain link fences along the north and east property __j lines - is any fence proposed to replace these? UPDATE 09/06/06: Clarify what is occuring at the northeast corner of the property. The fencing and buildings would appear to prevent access to this area. L13 With regard to the Public Amenities Incentive Pool request for two (2) dwelling units, the application needs to be more specific to those amenities being proposed. Please be advised that those amenities eligible to be used are specifically listed within the Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan located within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan (ref: pg. 215). UPDATE 09/06/06: No response was provided to this comment. How do vehicles egress from the proposed garages? It would not appear that adequate room exists for a vehicle leaving either of the end garages. Also, what accommodations would be made for an unit owner who possessed a vehicle that could not fit inside one of the garages? UPDATE 09/06/06: The above issues have not been addressed with the revisions. ?. The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #6 needs to include additional information as to why the project has been designed with the refuse area located adjacent to a residential use. S7?i it zr.3 P?o?ti?' UPDATE 09/06/06: The revised response addresses the existing use and the adjacent use to the north, but not how the proposed use has been designed to minimize adverse effects on adjacent properties. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, within the Old Bay District, those properties east of Osceola Avenue have a maximum height of 40 feet. Further, pursuant to Section 8-102 of the Community Development Code, height is defined as the vertical distance from the mean elevation of existing grade to the highest finished roof surface in the case of a building with a flat roof. The height of the proposed building is being measured from finished floor and to the median of the flat roof, both of which are inconsistent with the Code. Thus, the building appears to be taller than permissable. The aforementioned height definition also states that elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height and that parapet walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs shall be permitted to extend not higher than 42 inches over maximum height in the district. The proposed elevator equipment room exceeds the allowable maximum and no provision exists to allow the stairs to reach their proposed height. Further, the parapet is 7 feet tall at its highest point, which exceeds the above referenced maximum. Additionally, the amenities depicted on the roof plan (A1.3) do not appear on the elevations and the spa and gazebos both exceed the maximum height allowable and will need to be removed. UPDATE 09/06/06: While the majority of the above comment has been addressed, the spas are still proposed and will exceed the allowable height. 0 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, seperation between buildings should provide for useable space such as an alley or another open space compliant with these Design Guidelines. UPDATE 09/06/06: The revised plans have shifted the building and created a three foot (3') open space along the south property line. How is this open space compliant with the Design ?O?., "0 Guidelines? -M Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 16 The eave of the st*wer on the south side of the building will encth onto the abutting I &P. property. Also, the eave on the north side of the clubhouse will encroach onto the abutting property to the north. MATE 09/06/06: The encroachment of the north clubhouse eave has not been addressed. Provide an elevation for the rear (east) of the garages. UPDATE 09/06/06: A rear elevation of the garages has not been provided. The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion #2 does not address how the project is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan or the other items outlined in the criterion. UPDATE 09/06/06: While substantial information has been provide with regard to the Design Guidelines, the revised response does not address the Comprehensive Plan. It is understood that the flat roof needs to have a slope so as to accommodate drainage; however can the outer walls/parapet along the north and south sides of the building be designed so as to ``'?s not reflect this slope? mitt r?3 U.?a • The proposed utility plan (C4.1) depicts the water, sewer and fire lines; however the plan depicts nothing as far as electrical is concerned despite the presence of overhead power lines at the east side of the property. UPDATE 09/06/06: This comment has not been addressed. 4a0T 3 In the response provided for General Applicability Criterion #1 you state that a "friendly tl?S"a pedestrian sitting area in front of the lot" has been provided and also that lush landscaping is provided in the back of the lot. Please clarify where these items are. 14 . Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, all utilities, including rGr? individual distribution lines, shall be installed underground at the time of development. UPDATE 09/06/06: This comment has not been addressed. At minimum, provide a notation such effect on the utility plan. _ OPursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings 'SO shall maintain the build-to line or the setback of the developments block and the block across the licu?¢aa-?_ ?Qa>S5? street. Buildings should be located farther from the build-to line when done to provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian oriented design features which maintain the build-to line. UPDATE 09/06/06: No information has been provided as to the build-to line established by those adjacent developments or how the subject proposal is consistent with that build-to line. 06T Of7 No response has been provided for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion #6.d. Also, the responses provided for 6.a and b do not state how compliance has been achieved. The floor plans are denoted as being at a scale of 1/8" = F-0"; however the plans are not at said scale. s? 18 . The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion #4 does not address how the elimination of cross access to the adjacent property to the south will not result in a detriment to said property. UPDATE 09/06/06: The elimination of the cross-access to the property to the south has not been addressed. 19 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, visible, eon permanent or roll-down security bars/gates are inappropriate within the downtown. The fit= '" proposed wrought iron gates must be eliminated. UPDATE 09/06/06: The security gates are still depicted on the plans and will need to be removed. Other: No Comments Notes: The application can be deemed sufficient subject to the attached conditions being addressed with 15 sets of revised plans to be submitted by Noon, October 12, 2006. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 5, 2006 - Page 17 September 05, 2006 Mr. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III CITY OF CLEARWATER Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756-5520 tel: (727) 562-44604 fax: (727) 562-4865 robert.tefft@myclearwater.com Re: Response to DRC Comments 08-03-06.pdf FLD2006-06041 (601 North Fort Harrison Avenue) Clearwater Gardens Condominiums Dear Mr. Tefft; Engineers - Planners Project Managers Schlotter & Associates ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 05 2006 C PLANNING DEPART1Wp jT CITY OF CLEARI?I,ArEk This transmittal letter and attachments is to submit additional information responding to the subject DRC comments. General Engineering Comments: The Site Development Plans has been revised to include and conform to all of the items requested by the engineering department and the building permit requirement notes are acknowledged. Environmental Comments: The Dry Detention pond grassed bottom and side slopes do not exceed a maximum slope of 4:1 and is shown on the cross-section Plan Sheet C3.1. Vertical walls are required for the detention pond on three sides in order to achieve the necessary stormwater storage volumes and make this project work. The elevation of this property is relatively high and depth of the pond works, given the seasonal high water table elevation and the excellent percolation rate. The proposed detention pond will be landscaped and the wall will be finished in character with the building and will be attractive. The detention pond will be accessible from the street and will also be a pedestrian feature. Without approval of the proposed detention pond, the proposed redevelopment plan would not be feasible. P.O. Box 3256, Holiday, Florida 34690-0256 (727) 372-9256 Voice (727) 372-4586 FAX i FLD2006-06041 (601 N. Fort Harrison Ave Response to DRC Comments Sept. 05, 2006 Page 2 of 3 ORIGINAL RECEIVED 'EP 05 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Fire Comments: FDC's and Fire Hydrants have been added the Utilities Plan and are located at both the front and rear of the building for fire fighting. It is acknowledged that water-mains, hydrants and a hard road surface shall be completed and in service prior to construction and required Standpipe systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. The developer will provide County Knox Key Switch with back-up power source application prior to CDB. Land Resource Comments: It is not feasible to save the 42 inch oak tree on this property. The developer has offered inch for inch replacement for the necessary tree removals and also mitigation compensation in addition. Revised landscaped plans are submitted herewith and the tree replacement table has been updated accordingly. Landscaping Comments: The Landscape designer, (Margaret Moore) has revised plans to address these review comments and has prepared a separate response letter, which is attached to this transmittal letter for review. Parks and Recreation: The developer will contact Art Kader separately to determine open space/recreation impact fees prior to building permit issuance. Stormwater Comments: Prior to CDB, off-site drainage from the property to the East will be directed around the site. Prior to Building Permit issuance a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit will be provided and construction plans will sow over-sized gutters along the back side of the buildings with drains directing run-off to rain-leaders to the detention pond and not onto adjacent property. The roofs of the garages slope towards our storm- sewers and not onto adjacent property. Solid Waste Comments: The dumpster enclosure details have been revised to City specifications. The under-building drive-thru clearance has been revised to a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. Traffic Engineering Comments: The under-building drive-thru clearance has been revised to a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. The handicapped parking sign has been revised to City standards. The two-stack parking garage lift is built with a pit so that either car been be used without moving the other out of the way. Movement time is approximately 40 seconds. The garage lift equipment operates either electrically and/or hydraulically. The final product selection has not yet been determined. The Site Development Plan has been revised to provide an accessible route from the South building to the Clubhouse with a ramp and cross- walk. Please advise if additional issues need to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning Comments: Revised Proposed Development Plans and Addendum to Flexible Development Standards Application are resubmitted with this transmittal letter and address Planning Department Review Comments. Please advise if any additional information or clarification is needed prior to DRC FLD2006-06041 (601 N. Fort Harrison Ave.) Response to DRC Comments Sept. 05, 2006 Page 3 of 3 It is hoped that a sufficiency determination can be made at this time for this proposed development and that this project can move forward and be scheduled for the October 05, 2006 DRC meeting. Fifteen (15) sets of revised plans and re-submittals addressing these DRC Comments are herewith submitted by noon, September 05, 2006. Please advise if any additional information is needed prior to the DRC meeting and we will respond immediately. Your assistance with this project is greatly appreciated. Respectfully Su.bm Mbb SCHLOTT??sB x "Certificate`s `' , Rri ?K.`',3811 /f I%L anige$gilottor P C FL L 6AW,:, 32( ?. % att. Dl v?l?Yne?t• ?? evised Fl ;5Q,0,91p 4pMent Application Addendum Landscape Plans, revised Topographic Survey, revised ORIGINAL RECEIVE' ;-- " 0 4 200E PLANNING DEPARTMENT' CITY OF CLEARWATER CAS&MCGCORC Respoese.doc 09/05/2006 00:00 7273761201 0 M MOORE LPD 0 PAGE 02 • Margaret Moore Landscape Planning and Design Award Winning Commercial • Residential ifs 376-0205 RESPONSE to: City of Clearwater, Development Review Agenda, Comments, Thursday, August 3rd, 2006, Page 34, RE: Clearwater Gardens Landscaping Plan ORIGINAL RECEIVED DATE: September 4, 2006 S EP 0 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Your comment # L The landscape plan meets the requirement of 10% of the gross vehicular use area of 11,911 S.F. 1,191 S.F. of landscaping is required and has been provided within interior landscape islands. 2. Shrubs constitute at least 50% of the required landscape- annuals not included. 3. Shade trees are not closer than 5' to an impervious area. 4. Sky Needle and Crape Myrtle meet your requirement of 8' OAH. 5. Per your request, the Fiddle Leaf Fig have been replaced with Sky Pencil. 6. Done. 7. All plants on/under fence are vines and maintenance will be from the inside of the fence. If you have any questions, I can be reached on cell 727-514-1132 or 727- 376-0205. Sincerely, 5 "'e- Margaret Moore Margaret Moore Landscape Planning & Design e-mail: margaret.i.moore@get.net 8036 Brown Pelican Avenue - New Pori Richey, Florida 34653 AUG-26-2006 03:01 AM VE ICA.RIPPLE 720 57 0144 P.01 VERONICA RIPPLE, R.A. 14332 SHEA DR. SPRING HILL, FL. 34610 727 857-0144 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: Aug. 24, 2006 TIME: „^4:gg o.m. PAGE ,L OF_L PAGES TRANSMITTED TO: FAX NO.: FROM: PROJECT NAME(s): PROJECT NO.(s): SUBJECT: Dear Mr. Tefft, City Clearwater Planning Dept, Attn: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III 727-562-4865 Veronica "Boni" Ripple, R.A. Clearwater Gardens Condominiums 0601 City of Clearwater Comments FLD 2006-080411 601 N. Ft. Harrison Ave, The following draft sketches reflect my interpretation of the design element revisions as disussed with you a short while ago, Please give me your approvalloomments to these drawings. Thanks for your help. Please call our office if you have any questions or need additional Information. Sincerely, Veronica "Ron!" Ripple, R.A. CC. Schlotter & Assoc. Fax - 727 372-4586 m m a m N N W N N r~ w J d d M Q U w x 0 w E Q M m M G w m CD N I I0 N I 7 Q Tr T/ ROOF T/ 2nd FL T/ let FL TI ? GADE s - LLJ-U e TI 3rd FL SLAB ' 0 V-9 fi T! ?r+d ?L SLAB SLAB SLAB EX1STfMG. 2 FRONT raL.WooATION a? SGAL?s ???*1'-0" ?a s N m a .9 T/ ROOF `-? m h GO ? N N N T/ 3rd FL SLA5 - w a T/ 2nd FL SLAB a U i N Z 4 T/ 2nd SLAB ?t N ? m r 0 M) T/ istl FL m :xisT _ N RARE Q I ID N I L7 7 .Q T SIDE EL.OVATIQN Al 2 ? • 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 0 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: August 24, 2006 To: Veronica Ripple, (727) 372-4586 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2006-06041 (601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue) Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: Comments: Veronica: The elevations are close to what was being discussed between Mark, Frank and myself; however I still have a concern with regard to the integration of the "sunrooms" with the balance of the building base. They still appear too distinct from the balance of the building base, and the second floor appears to still be a balcony. Also, the sunroom windows don't seem to work with the other windows on the building. Looking at the revised elevations, I had another thought that I have not mentioned to Mark or Frank - has any consideration been given to using French doors instead of sliding glass doors? I think this may look a bit better than the sliding glass. If you have any questions let me know. ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftnmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** t} • Aug. 24 2006 04:28PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 93724586 Aug.24 04:27PM 00'37 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEB CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). AUG-24-2006 10:54 PM VERONICA.RIPPLE 727 857 0144 P.01 • VERONICA RIPPLE, R.A. 14332 SHEA DR. SPRING HILL, FL. 34610 727 887.0144 fAgJIM1LE C V R INCET DATE: Aug. 24, 2006 TIME: ,1.1:46_.Lm._ PAGE , t OFJL PAGES TRANSMITTED TO: FAX NO.: FROM: PROJECT NAMEW: PROJECT NO-(9): SUBJECT: Deer Mr. Tefft, City Clearwater Planning Dept, Attn: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III 727-562-4865 Veronica "Roni" Ripple, R.A. Clearwater Gardens Condominiums 0801 City of Clearwater Comments FLD 2008-06041, 601 N. Ft, Harrison Ave. Mark Tezarls (Project Owner) and Frank S?chlotter (General Contractor & Civil Eng.) for this project met with you a week or so ago to discuss the aesthetic elements of the exterior elevations of the building. I have made revisions to the building after discussions with the agave, and incorporated your comments into the revised design. Please review and give me your comments/approval as soon as you can so that we can revise the colored perspetive rendering. The deadline for resubmittal is approaching quickly. Yout help is greatly appreciated. Please cah our office if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Veronica "Roni" Ripple, R.A. CC. Schlotter & Assoc. Fax - 727 372-4586 _,.u. - ---- _- - - D C Gl N A I N @ r @ N N '0 3 m A 0 z M n D N T r m • IS N 0 N 19 `?L A @ N (wd al ga. wv* vA4 moo) -710".j 5A.4 na NO 1 IVAMOIS .1.NQad:d M a VINYL FENCE EQUIP. 5GREEN CULTURED STONE BALUSTRADES 91 w J d d M Q U M o I?{? ,a Lra"T SAND TEXTURE STUCCO, FAINTED O - H4EAVY SAND TI=XTUW STUCCO, PAINTED Q FOAM I I" OLDW3 W/ STUCCO FINISH, PAINTED w w a 3/4" W X I/2' 0 CONTROL. JOINT U m d t- -. 17 r~ - • - - o nn IN LL-EL N [E-6-8 NOW N ? m - a a M a U In 9fi Iffiri M Z I?rr W ? UI1.33 m =L 325' m .L 395' m I N RrEAR EL Y Adr i o N N - u 5C-ALE: IM"=V-O" D YS? a N m s It ' T/ ROOF m ti OD ? N 0 N N T/ 3rd R S?AB W a T/ 2nd FL SLAB a U ? M z IP > T/ 2nd FL SLAB F d m T/ 1st FL w SLAB m =XiSTNG= (4 9 I N I to Q C? LI 1. AA dem-Ni o RIGHT $100 Elrm1/AT I ON 0 ill i'Y? € € E ? EN CULTURED STONE 5ALU5TRADE5 0 m N N W r - N r` w J a a U w z O x w } E d ?D Ifi O ?D m m N I It N I t, Q U" L I L ?ot?C ?L.EvA"Lol?. 0 0 0 r r 1:40 pm Case Number: FLD2006-06041 -- 601 N FT HARRISON AVE Owner(s): Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions L 4965 W Breeze Cir Palm Harbor, Fl 34683 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Frank C Schlotter 6885 Copperfield Drive New Port Richey, Fl 346 TELEPHONE: 727-372-9256, FAX: 727-372-4586,E-MAIL: schlotter0l@msn.com Location: 0.652 acres along the east side of North Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately 000 feet south of Eldridge Street. Atlas Page: 277B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development application to permit 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Old Clearwater Bay Neighborhood Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 1828 Venetian Point Drive TELEPHONE: 461-0564, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: southern@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood North Greenwood Association, Inc. Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33755 1201 Douglas Road TELEPHONE: 560-4382, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: WADENWADE@AOL.COM Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 3, 2006 - Page 32 1 Prior to CDB the following issues shall be addressed: 1. Replace all details on Sheet C4.2 with applicable City Indices. The City's Construction Standards and Utility Information can be found on our web site: www.myelearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp . 2. Replace all details on Sheet C4.3 with applicable City Indices. 3. Replace all Utilities of Florida Details on Sheet C4.4; add City of Clearwater details as applicable. 4. Replace sanitary sewer lateral detail on Sheet C4.5 with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #305. 5. Revise Utility Plan to show backflow prevention device in right-of-way or in easement dedicated by the Condo Plat. 6. FDC shall be located no greater than 40-feet from a FHA and greater than 15-feet from the building. 7. Show on Utility Plan all proposed water meters. 8.Provide double-sweep sanitary cleanout in right-of-way in accordance with City Index 304, Sheet 1 of 3. Prior to building permit the following shall be addressed: 1. Brick paver sidewalk will be subject to separate right-of-way permit. 2. Sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project shall be designed and constructed consistent with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #109, including the A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) Replace sidewalk detail on page C2.3 with city index #109. 3. New dumpster enclosures: Maximum 6'-0" high and constructed of concrete block. Materials used should be consistent with those used in the construction of and architectural style of the principal building, see City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "C", Construction Standards, Index #701. Replace dumpster detail on page C2.3 with city index #701. Condominium Plat shall be recorded prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for this development. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Fire: 1. Dry Detention systems shall be designed with a grassed bottom and side slopes no steeper than han 4:1. Label proposed pond slopes on the cross-section on Sheet C3.1. 2. In accordance with the City Storm Drainage Design Criteria, Page 7, vertical walls in detention ponds may only be approved due to reason of undue hardship to the developer. Provide description of the hardship that necessitates vertical walls for this project. FDC is required to be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 40'. Hydrant shall not be located on same main as Fire Sprinkler and must be on supply side of double detector check valve.FDC to be on front side of the project.Add an additional hydrant one for fire fighting and one for the F.D.C. Show on plan PRIOR TO CDB Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Priovide County Knox Key Switch with back-up power source PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: No comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 3, 2006 - Page 33 Legal: 1 . No comments N Land Resources: 1 . Efforts must be made to save the " oak tree, as this tree recieved a higher arborist rating. 2. The proposed plans do not take tree preservation into consideration. ALL of the trees have severe impacts as the garage and clubhouse footer systems effectivly remove the trees. The two large oak trees did not recieve any consideration for preservation. Suggest that the arborist's recommendation be adhered to. Landscaping: Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1 of the Community Development Code, ten percent (10%) of the gross vehicular use area shall be provided in the form of landscape within interior landscape islands. This equates to roughly 1,160 square feet of interior landscape as proposed. The landscape plan denotes a total of 3,061 square feet of landscape area across the entire site; however this figure include substantial perimeter landscaping. Clarify how the proposed landscape plan meets this requirement. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.E.1 of the Community Development Code, shrubs shall constitute Lam/ 50% of the required interior landscape area. As proposed, the development may meet this requirement; however further information needs to be provided to clarify this issue. ,:p3' Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1 of the Community Development Code, shade trees shall be planted a minimum of five feet (5') from any impervious area. It is possible that the landscape plan meets this requirement; however as the landscape plan has not been provided at a measurable scale a determination cannot be made. Pursuant to Section 3-1202.13.1 of the Community Development Code, at the time of installation accent trees shall have a height of eight feet (8'). The proposed Sky Pencial Holly and Crepe Myrtle do not meet this requirement. The propsoed Fiddle Leaf Fig should be replaced with a more hearty species. Several proposed plant materials with differing quantities and/or specifications have been listed in the materials table with the same key (SR, CJ, PMX an J). Provide differing keys to eliminate potential confusion/conflicts regarding these materials. Along the south property line several plant materials are proposed on the south side of fence. How will these materials be maintained? Parks and Recreation: 1 . Site data table needs to reflect the square footage of the existing building. Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 , Prior to CDB, show how offsite drainage from the property to the east is directed around this site. Solid Waste: Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant is to provide the following: ])copy of approved SWFWMD permit 2)construction plans are to show oversized roof gutters along the back side of the buildings with drains directing runoff to the retention pond and not onto adjacent property That dumpster enclousure(s) needs to be to City specifications and shown on detail. At least 14 feet clearance under building for entrance to rear. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 3, 2006 - Page 34 Drive through vertical clear height shall be a minimum of 8'-2". 2. Handicapped parking sign is not to City standards. Revise detail to read fine is $255 not $250. 3. How does a two stack garage work? 4. Provide an accessible route from the south building to the club house (provide a ramp and crosswalk). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 3, 2006 - Page 35 Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the Old Bay Character District states that the portion of the District east of Osceola Avenue should remain urban in character reflecting low-rise scale (two to three stories) of the existing neighborhood. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Old Bay District Policy #7 states that new development on Fort Harrison Avenue shall be oriented toward the street to encourage pedestrian activity and a dynamic street life. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, Old Bay District Policy #9 states that mixed-use development is encouraged along North Fort Harrison Avenue. 04 Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, within the Old Bay District, those properties east of Osceola Avenue have a maximum height of 40 feet. Further, pursuant to Section 8-102 of the Community Development Code, height is defined as the vertical distance from the mean elevation of existing grade to the highest finished roof surface in the case of a building with a flat roof. The height of the proposed building is being measured from finished floor and to the median of the flat roof, both of which are inconsistent with the Code. Thus, the building appears to be taller than permissable. The aforementioned height definition also states that elevator equipment rooms and like / mechanical equipment enclosures shall be permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the ? maximum height and that parapet walls constructed on buildings with flat roofs shall be permitted to extend not higher than 42 inches over maximum height in the district. The proposed elevator equipment room exceeds the allowable maximum and no provision exists to allow the stairs to reach their proposed height. Further, the parapet is 7 feet tall at its highest point, which exceeds the above referenced maximum. Additionally, the amenities depicted on the roof plan (A1.3) do not appear on the elevations and the spa and gazebos both exceed the maximum height allowable and will need to be removed. Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the District Vision of the Old Bay District states that North Fort Harrison Avenue is envisioned as the main commercial area providing neighborhood commercial uses on properites on both sides of the street. The area between North Fort Harrison Avenue and Garden Avenue should continue to be a mixed-use area permitting commercial and office development and encouraging the inclusion of residential uses in mixed-use development. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, joint/common access driveways between sites should be provided. It is noted that the survey provided with this development proposal depicts a proposed ingress/egress easement along the south property line that is presumable to maintain vehicular access to the rear of the adjacent property; however this easement is not found on the proposed plans and further the plans make no provisions for such access. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the use of interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials shall be used for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. 87 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, open spaces should function as transitions between the public sidewalks and streets and the use of the property. Further, such open spaces should be visible and inviting to the pedestrian. The 9 proposed open space in front of the property does not meet these Guidelines. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings shall maintain the build-to line or the setback of the developments block and the block across the street. Buildings should be located farther from the build-to line when done to provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian oriented design features which / 1 maintain the build-to line. a 710 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, seperation between buildings should provide for useable space such as an alley or another open space compliant with these Design Guidelines. .,lh Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, building form shall visually relate to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth. Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, buildings shall have a distinct base, middle and cap. The beginnings of a clearly defined base, middle and cap are evident; however the balconies dominate the front (west) elevation and do nothing to create these distinct elements. Additionally, the cap needs to be more clearly differentiated from the middle. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 3, 2006 - Page 36 Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, finished floor heights a minimum of two feet (T) above the sidewalk grade shall be provided for residential buildings within predominantly mixed-use and commercial areas. A*C Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, a secondary facade is a facade that faces an alley and/or parking area. The overall design of these facades shall be consistent with the primary facade with regard to architectural style, materials, finish, color and detail. Several elements of the rear (east) elevation lack sufficient detail (i.e. stairs and elevator). 15 ? Pursuant to the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, visible, permanent or roll-down security bars/gates are inappropriate within the downtown. The proposed wrought iron gates must be eliminated. 'Y. Pursuant to Section 3-804.A.2 of the Community Development Code, wall with masonry columns linked by substantial grillwork shall be permitted to a maximum height of six feet (6). As proposed, the wall extends to a height of nearly eight feet (T-10") and must be reduced. Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, all utilities, including individual distribution lines, shall be installed underground at the time of development. 8 The proposed utility plan (C4.1) depicts the water, sewer and fire lines; however the plan depicts nothing as far as electrical is concerned despite the presence of overhead power lines at the east side of the property. 19 The survey depicts the existance of wood and chain link fences along the north and east property lines - is any fence proposed to replace these? 421r. Many of the buildings, fences and walls are situated approximately one foot (F) from the property lines. How is maintanence of those portions of the property between the buildings/fence and the property line intended to be accomplished? Also, how will maintenance of those portions of the building occur in the future? ,21! Pursuant to Section 3-1402.A of the Community Development Code, the standard depth of a parking space is 18 feet. The depth of the proposed handicap accessible parking spaces is proposed at 20 feet. Where will guests of the unit owners park their vehicles? ,2 The roof plan (A1.3) depicts numerous trees atop the building. How are these trees supported? What type of trees are proposed? What will the building look like with the trees planted atop? The stair towers and elevator tower are not depicted on the front (west) elevation although the T 25 will be visible. The eave of the stair tower on the south side of the building will encroach onto the abutting property. Also, the eave on the north side of the clubhouse will encroach onto the abutting property to the north. 6' . Provide an elevation for the rear (east) of the garages. Can the proposed openings on the north and south sides of the building exist given the buildings proximity to the adjacent properties? Verify with the Building Dept. that the building as proposed could be built. The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #1 states that the development will be in harmony with the Old Bay District; however the response provides nothing as to how this is the case. Revise the response to address scale, bulk, coverage, density and character. Also, the response references Floor Area Ratio (FAR); however as the development proposal contains no commercial element, FAR has no applicability. The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #5 does not address how the development proposal is consistent with the immediate vicinity. The response provided to General Applicability Criterion #6 needs to include additional information as to why the project has been designed with the refuse area located adjacent to a residential use. 31 . The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion #2 does not address how the project is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan or Moss marts! the other items outlined in the criterion. 4 i_kQT 32 . does not The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion # abpPpe S9-2-2-L> address how the elimination of cross access to the adjacent property to the south will not result in a detriment to said property. X33 The response provided to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criterion #6 does not address how the development proposal is consistent with the five (5) design objectives. J1. 4- - Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 3, 2006 - Page 37 I1 • • 34 . With regard to the Public Amenities Incentive Pool request for two (2) dwelling units, the Y3-8-1.! The proposed architectural style would seem more appropriate for development on the barrier Notes: A determination of sufficiency cannot be made for this development proposal at this time. In order to be scheduled for the DRC meeting of October 5, 2006, please submit 15 sets of revised plans addressing these comments by Noon, September 4, 2006. application needs to be more specific to those amenities being proposed. Please be advised that those amenities eligible to be used are specifically listed within the Master streetscape and Wayfnding Plan located within the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan (ref: pg. 215). s35'. Please be advised that the streetscape proposed along North Fort Harrison Avenue is inconsistent with the typical streetscape plans set forth for N. Fort Harrison Avenue in the Master streetscape and Wayfnding Plan. How do vehicles egress from the proposed garages? It would not appear that adequate room exists for a vehicle leaving either of the end garages. Also, what accommodations would be made for an unit owner who possessed a vehicle that could not fit inside one of the garages? Pursuant to Section 3-1404.C, all required parking spaces, including appropriate access thereto, shall remain unobstructed and available for use in accordance with their purpose. The proposed stacked parking spaces would not appear to be consistent with this requirement as only one of the spaces within the stack is available at any given moment. island than for development within the downtown. Consider a change in the architectural style of the development. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 3, 2006 -Page 38 0 _ CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr Orl=,cr Box 4748, CuF:Apw "17i1t, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, Sravlci:s BijiLDING, 100 SOU'I'1-I Myin'u: Av1iNUIi, CLHARWA'rr:rc, FLORIDA 33756 TELETHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGI: PIANNING Diw]TOPMNNT RI:w11;W July 11, 2006 Mr. Frank C. Schlotter 6885 Copperfield Drive New Port Richey, FL 34655 Re: FLD2006-06041- 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue - Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Schlotter: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-06041. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, August 3, 2006, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ?l -l` 11/? Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tef??myclearwater.com II;.N?N I Inns,NND, \1AV(,N 1(flIN DORAN, C(A M ILMIIiN MIN I IM-1 I I:NNIII:MN, O)l NCHAIENMEN NI.L JcmSON, Cud NCIL WMIU.N ® CARLEN A. PPTNRSF:N, O NCILMENMER 'T( WAI. F•NIIIH )Y IP.N I AN) Aisi:wmA wig AC'llON I:•MIT( vr.R" • i CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE C1 earwater CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: July 11, 2006 To: Frank C. Schlotter, (727) 372-4586 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2006-06041 / 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefflnmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.nayclearwater.com ** 0 • Jul. 11 2006 11:11AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 93724586 Jul.11 11:10AM 00'49 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-BOO-HELP-FAX C435-73291. 0 0 C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos't' Ori=ICI; Box 4748, CI.i:ARWATER, Fi.owDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. Si'.aviC.rs BUILDING, 100 SOUTH Myi',i, 1: Avi ,Nuii, CLP.ARWATIT, FLORIDA 33756 fFL EPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RluuGl: PLANNING DENF .OPMEM, RL:Vii?W July 3, 2006 Mr. Frank C. Schlotter 6885 Copperfield Drive New Port Richey, FL 34655 Re: FLD2006-06041- 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Schlotter: The Planning Department has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2006-06041. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: The Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application submitted is outdated. The most recent application consists of revised Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria. Pursuant to Section G of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, all required sight triangles shall be depicted on the site plan. While sight triangles are depicted, they are not consistent with those required by Code. Pursuant to Section G of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, the number of proposed dwellings units is to be denoted on the site data table. Pursuant to Section H of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, the following items are to be included on the landscape plan: ;9, Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; )' Sight visibility triangles (not depicted are per Code); iEi Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing (the curbing has been depicted in full); and Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered. Pursuant to. Section I of the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application, building elevation drawings shall include the following: ,V Dimensions; ?Ef, Colors (color elevations have been provided, but the colors are not identified - provide color samples and denote colors on plan); and b: Materials. rNnNF I lutis:u:u, MASON JUIIN I)ONAN, CUi N(a1..1FM1 .N I Ian r I I:?>ni:r<?N. CH'NCHA1P.?1[W]" Iiii.i_ JONU)N, Crn N(1i.w:.\11WIl; ® Cnri.r;N A. 1'rll'.1zS1[N, Cox Nr.ii.?m.?usrr, "F? ? ;AL I?alPi.O .\1FN*r ANA) Arrirm,,vrivi? Acru>N EMP1.0) IT" • A request is being made from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool with the development proposal; however a Public Amenities Incentive Pool application has not been made. Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Tuesday, July 11, 2006. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.teffi@mvclearwater.com CITY OF CLEARWATER sw- LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT °' arwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 f FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: July 3, 2006 Frank C. Schlotter, (727) 372-4586 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2006-06041 / 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefft(a)mvclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** 0 Jul. 03 2006 09:50AN YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 93724586 Jul.03 09:49AM 01'04 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329]. FT ,D 2 06-06041. 161 TEZARIS & BIEBER ACQUISITIONS, 08 OSCEOL.A i.t^: ll'cD PARTNERSHI INC N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR # 100 4,965 W. BREEZE CIRCLE WAUKESHA WI 53188 - 1131 t #LM HARBOR, FL 36483 ANDERSON, MICHAEL T 1945 HASTINGS LN CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 4421 ANDRUS, BRIAN L ANDRUS,DONNA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH-E CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3933 ATTIE, JOE 700 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3821 BAITZ, WOLFGANG PARKW EG 5 DORSTEN 46284 00004 - GERMANY AUSTIN, LLOYD B THE AUSTIN, THELMA L THE 5840 SINGLE FOOT CT SPARKS NV 89436 - 7062 BANKS, DONALD J JR BANKS, ANGELA D 700 N OSCEOLA AVE # B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3821 BASKIN, HAMDEN H III BAYBAK, MICHAEL BASKIN, ROBYN T 4515 OCEAN VIEW BLVD # 305 13577 FEATHER SOUND DR STE 550 LA CANADA CA 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 5527 BEAN, MARJORIE E 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 510 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 BEND, JOSEPH P THE BEND, AGNES L THE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 BERNSTEIN, BRADFORD N BEACH,HAROLD 2441 HONOLULU AVE # 120 MONTROSE CA 91020 - 2507 BOLGER, ELEANOR H 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 811 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3915 BROWN, ELANA 138 OCEAN PKWY # 11 N BROOKLYN NY 11218 - 2407 BILGUTAY, ILHAN M 510 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4126 BRAWLEY, JOHN. B & BENAY L TRUS 1504 E OCEAN BLVD NEWPORT BEACH CA 92661 - 1434 BROWN, MAXINE S 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 qlTKEN, DEBORA K AITKEN, DAVID N 2814 AUTUMN LAKE DR KATY TX 77450 - 5700 ANDRUS, D THE HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT 206TR PO BOX 775 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0775 AYTCH, VIRLA EST 407 N SATURN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5930 BARTON, DONNA L D'AREZZO, JAMES D 465 1 ST ST W STE # 300 SONOMA CA 95476 - 6600 BAYVIEW CONDO CLEARWATER ASSN 730 BONNIE BRAE ST WINTER PARK FL 32789 - 2809 BERLE, RONALD BERLE, PEGGY A 131 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2304 BLAKE, RICHARD T BLAKE, TINA M 5708 HOLLOWBROOKE TRL ACWORTH GA 30101 - 6958 BRINSTER, KATHLEEN 6 WOODCHASE LN KINNEON NJ 07405 - 3334 BRUWER, GRAHAM BRUWER, LYNDA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 BRYANT, JOHN H BULGER, LORRAINE BULLDOG DEVELOPMENT CO LLC SMITH, DOROTHYE G 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH E 714 N FORT HARRISON AVE 406 SPRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3933 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3822 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4146 ?, BURDETTE, HARRY M JR BURNISON, JACK quSWEILER, JOHN T 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 405 BURNISON, PENNY E BUSWEILER, CATHERINE E CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 409 N FORT HARRISON AVE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 503 f CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3904 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3938 BYRNES, LAWRENCE F CARMEL, MORDEHAY CARTER, ROBERT E 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 605 4220 MESA VISTA DR CARTER, JUDITH M CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 LA CANADA CA 00030 - 5521 EL ENCANTO DR SANTA ROSA CA 95409 - 4308 CHACHULA, NICHOLAS J CHACHULA, RUSSELL W 401 S MARS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6565 CLEARWATER FREE CLINIC INC 707 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3823 CHACHULA, RUSSELL W 401 S MARS CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6565 CLEARWATER GARDEN CLUB 405 SEMINOLE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3860 CHACHULA, RUSSELL W 401 S MARS CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 6565 CLEARWATER INV INC 13577 FEATHER SOUND DR STE 550 CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 5527 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOOD COALE, JOHN P COBB, DONALD D HOUSIN VANSUSTEREN, GRETA C COBB, SUSAN M 608 N GARDEN AVE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH C 511 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3826 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3932 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3944 COOMBS, PHYLLIS M CORBETT, ERNEST COTA, JEFFERY D 603 7TH ST CORBETT, GAYE COTA, PATRICIA L LIVERPOOL NY 13088 - 4426 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 802 3410 HARGER CT CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 SACRAMENTO CA 95821 - 3717 CULLODEN, CHARLES A THE CUNNINGHAM, SHERRI L DAKE, RICHARD L CULLODEN, SALLY B THE RAMP, LENIN 700 N OSCEOLA AVE # 3D 2000 BEL AIRE DR 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 408 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3821 GLENDALE CA 91201 - 1127 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 DARE, LOUIS DAVIS, EDWARD A DORNBUSCH, HARRIETTE KENDLER DARE, SUSAN DAVIS, PEGGY J 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 302 9630 LA TUNA CANYON RD 1206 HONAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 SUN VALLEY CA 91352 - 2232 SOUTH BEND IN 46614 - 2172 DORSETT, KENDALL L DRIVER, KIRK DYKSTRA, FREDRIC J DORSETT, ELLEN BURNS, DOUGLAS J DYKSTRA, VALOREE Z 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 107 PO BOX 4087 700 N OSCEOLA AVE # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4087 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3817 ECCLES, CHET R III ECKHART, JAMES E ECKSTEIN, LIDO ECCLES, INGRID L ECKHART, CARLENE KROSCHSTR 38 PO BOX 490 706 18TH ST RODINGEN 52445 00004 - APPLEGATE CA 95703 - 0490 MANHATTAN BEACH CA 90266 - 2506 GERMANY ERIKSEN; VIVIAN S VANS, LOUIS V 4RAIRBANKS, CRAIG ERIKSEN, ROCHELLE K EVANS, IDA M DARCEY, JAMES JOSEPH PO BOX 847 607 SPRUCE AVE 937 BIRMINGHAM RD MONTE VISTA CO 81144 - 0847 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3870 BURBANK CA 91504 - 1912 FARHAT, MARY K THE FISCHLER, IDO 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 103 FISCHLER, DAPHNA CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 208 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 FORD, SANDRA FRANK C. SCHLOTTER, P.E 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 303 6885 COPPERFIELD DRIVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34655 FLEMING, ROY E JR GREEN, SARA E 1837 VENETIAN POINT DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1753 GANGELHOFF, DAVID J 405 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3904 GARDNER, JOSEPH EST GEORGE, OTIS GEORGIA STREET PROPERTIES LLC 401 N GARDEN AVE # 4 PROCTOR, MINNIE EST 714 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4174 448 MAPLE WAY ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3822 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2936 GIBSON, ROBERT W GLEASON, FRANK R GOLDEN KEY MGMT INC GIBSON, GENEVIEVE GLEASON, SUSANNE W 609 N OSCEOLA AVE 7610 SMETANA LN #309 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3839 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 - 4753 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 GONZALEZ, CARLOS J GRAVES, ROBERT M GREENE, LAWRENCE GONZALEZ, JEANETTE M 244 HARTNELL PL GREENE, ERNESTINE 700 N OSCEOLA AVE # 505 SACRAMENTO CA 95825 - 6612 9 SNOW DRIFT DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3817 PISCATAWAY NJ 08854 - 5937 GUSTIN, CRAIG M GUY, ALBERT L 1849 CHILDERS PL GUY, LINDA M SALZSIEDER, TIMOTHY S ATLANTA GA 30324 - 2778 1689 OAK PL SALZSIEDER, SUSAN D CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1351 10014 BENNINGTON DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 2403 HAGAN, JILL HALEVY, BINIAMIN HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # PHG HALEVY, SARA CONDO CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3947 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 209 500 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3947 HARTELL, JAMES H HOLMES, WILLIE B HOMELESS EMERGENCY PROJECT HARTELL, EDITH P 505 N GARDEN AVE INC 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4127 1120 N BETTY LN CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3303 HOOKS, RONALD IMMERSITE NETWORK INC JAMES, MILTON C HOOKS, JOHN C 504 N FORT HARRISON AVE JAMES, ROSE 702 GRANT ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 2563 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 JENSEN, CRAIG C THE JIMMIE, HOWARD R 4OHNSON, THOMAS EDWARD JENSEN, SALLY R THE 609 SEMINOLE ST JOHNSON, GINA 4245 MESA VISTA DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3865 2694 HARVEST DR LA CANADA CA 00030 - CONYERS GA 30013 - 2408 JOHNSON, WILLIAM M JR JONES, PENNY A KENNEDY, WALTRAUT M 1659 LONG ST 500 N OSCEOLA # 606 736 ISLAND WAY # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3631 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1817 KEPOS CORP KING, MICHAEL KOHLER & CO 635 CLEVELAND ST KING, TIMOTHY J 700 OSCEOLA AVE # 502 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4104 124 PLACER DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3816 SANTA BARBARA CA 93117 - 1314 KRECKEL, PATRICK F KUGLER, BENJAMIN R KULACH, STANLEY KRECKEL, ELINOR M FRIEDMAN, MARSHA KULACH, ANNA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 304 714 N FT HARRISON AVE 330 HARBOR PSE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3822 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1809 KUNHARDT, MARIA D KURPIEL, JOHN LEIBOLD, FRANK 11050 STRATHMORE DR #312 KURPIEL, MARIA 603 N OSCEOLA AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90024 - 1609 4444 GULFSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3839 NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 2012 LEONHARDT, GUNTER LEWIS, W A INC LOIZOS, ANASTASIA LEONHARDT, MELINDA C 2617 W GRAND BLVD MERWIN, EUGENIA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 403 DETROIT MI 48208 - 1234 75 MOUNT TOM RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 NEW ROCHELLE NY 10805 - 1216 LURIE, LESLIE MACHLER, T J MADERO, ESPERANZA 606 N OSCEOLA AVE 2265 SHARKEY RD 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3807 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2704 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 MADERO, MARIA R MANECCHIA, VICTOR MARQUARDT, KRISTINE F GONZALEZ, LIDIA M 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 501 PO BOX 1664 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 809 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3938 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1664 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3915 MC CORMICK, JOHN D MC COY, DELORIS MC LANE, CHARLES D JR 17305 SANTA ROSA MINE RD MC AFFEE, CURTIS J MC LANE, BETTY C PERRIS CA 92570 - 9540 1481 FRANKLIN ST 202 SUMMIT CIR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5305 GIBSONIA PA 15044 - 6035 MEHLER, HORST MERWIN, GAIUS W III MESCHOULAM, SAMUEL 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 411 MERWIN, EUGENIA MESCHOULAM, CLARISSE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 75 MOUNT TOM RD PALMA CRIOLLA # 4 301 NEW ROCHELLE NY 10805 - 1216 BOSQUES DE PALMAS HUIXQILUCAN 00002 - MEXICO MESSMO'RE, JACK DOUGLAS METHVEN, ALLEN MINKOFF HOLDINGS LTD MESSMORE, GAIL L METHVEN, JILL 2145 PARK DR 204 BARTHELOMEW BLVD 120 SW 7TH ST LOS ANGELES CA 90026 - 1919 z,fFFERSONVILLE IN 47130 - 7477 DUNDEE OR 97115 - 9535 MIRANDA, PETER 51 GALLOWAY ST WINDSOR BRISBANE 4030 00025 - AUSTRALIA MORSHEAD, JOHN W C C BOX 99-071 JOHANNESBURG 2000 00000 - SOUTH AFRICA O'LEARY, KIERAN O'LEARY, DONNA PO BOX 170699 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94117 MITCHELL, MARK W MITCHELL, SUSAN D 3037 WOODSONG LN CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2024 NIERENGARTEN, WARREN B NIERENGARTEN, JANICE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3934 ORTSCHEID, ROBERT A ORTSCHEID, JUDITH A 1092 ANDREWS ST -0699 TUSTIN CA 92780 - 4659 OSCEOLA-JONES PROPERTIES LLC 133 CANDY LN PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5471 PARKS, BRENDA M 504 BLANCHE B LITTLEJOHN TRL CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4145 PICCONE, ISELLA PICCONE, PATRIZIA 601 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3839 POWLEY, CHARLES N POWLEY, VIRGINIA J 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 509 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 OSTERTAG, MARTIN 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 PEREIRA, JOE X 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 POMAHAC, ROBERT R 5571 MARGARET AVE CULVER CITY CA 90230 - 6251 QUANN, MARK ADAMS, REBECCA E 131 N SAN MARINO AVE PASADENA CA 91107 - 3537 REICHARD, SHERWOOD MARSHALL REINHART, HENRY 2306 GREENGATE DR REINHART, MARY ANN AUGUSTA GA 30907 - 3558 108 TIMBERVIEW DR SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4734 ROCKL, RAYMOND G ROESCH, HANS K ROCKL, HILARIE J ROESCH, MARIA T 2020 E KENT AVE # 411 48 CASTLEDENE CIR VANCOUVER BC V5P 4X1 00030 - AGINCOURT ON M1T 1S1 00030 - CANADA CANADA MORSE, DAVID G THE MORSE, CAROL L THE 11450 RUGGIERO AVE LAKE VIEW TERRACE CA 91342 - 6735 OKUBOYE, JULIUS A 600 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3838 OSADCHEY, MICHAEL B OSADCHEY, JONI 7524 CHELTNAM CT NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34655 - 4218 PACE TECH PROPERTIES INC 2035 PHILIPPE PKWY SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2200 PERNA, LARRY F 6600 BERMUDA RD # A LAS VEGAS NV 89119 - 3604 POSYTON, AMANDA S GOLDENBERG, ELIAHU 700 OSECOLA AVE # 402 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3816 RAGUIDEAU, MAURICETTE 315 ELDRIDGE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3804 RICHARDSON, ROBERT R RICHARDSON, DEBORAH A 700 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3828 ROSS, COURTNEY D JOVANOVIC, DUBRAVKA 604 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3838 RULISON`, MAUREEN K 11850 DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR ST PETERSBURG FL 33716 - 1619 SADLON PROPERTIES INC 411 CLEVELAND ST # 110 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 SALVATION ARMY PO BOX 8070 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8070 NORTH GREENWOOD ASSOCIATION, INC. JONATHAN WADE 1201 DOUGLAS ROAD CLEARWATER, FL 33755 fyBACK, DANIEL RYBACK, DORIS A 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3934 SADLON PROPERTIES INC 411 CLEVELAND ST # 110 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION SONDRA KERR, PRESIDENT, P.O. BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 BAYVIEW HEIGHTS 625 MINNESOTA DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33755. 8P ELDRIDGE PLACE LLC 25400 U S HIGHWAY 19 N STE 154 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2150 SAKS, JOAN 307 ELDRIDGE ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3804 OLD CLEARWATER BAY NEIGHBORHOOD KATHY MILAM 1828 VENETIAN POINT DRIVE, CLEARWATER, FL 33767 FT,T)2(N1' 4019:127 ALEMIS, ALEXANDER ALEXANDER, WILLIAM THE 100 PIERCE ST # 701 100 PIERCE ST,#108 VLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5117 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5114 ARNOLD, B G ARNOLD, FRANCES COUNTRY CLUB VIEW MIDDLESBORO KY 40965 - BARBEE, CHARLES M BARBEE, SUSAN B 100 PIERCE ST # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 BEF INC 420 BAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5291 BOCK, THOMAS L BOCK, BARBARA R 100 PIERCE ST # 609 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5116 BRAADT,PAUL BRAADT, GEORGETTE 1028 S CEDARCREST BLVD ALLENTOWN PA 18103 - 5444 CHRISTOPHER, CHRISTINE F 100 PIERCE ST # 1010 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5162 CLARK, JAMES C CLARK, MICHAEL C 100 PIERCE ST # PH1 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5156 COLON, LUIS A JR COLON, JUDITH 11571 POPES HEAD VIEW LN FAIRFAX VA 22030 - 5451 CORR, DIANE C 100 PIERCE ST # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5141 DERNEHL, ROBERT DERNEHL,ROBERTA 981 MINIING GAP YOUNG HARRIS GA 30582 - BEILHART, ROBERT W 294 SPOTTIS WOODE CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5268 BOOCOCK, GERRY T THE BOOCOCK, REVA J THE 100 PIERCE ST # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5114 CAPEL PROPERTIES 995 MONTE CRISTO BLVD TIERRA VERDE FL 33715 - 2036 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION SONDRA KERR, PRESIDENT P.O. BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 CONNOLLY, SUZANNE A 1227 DIVISADERO ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 941 15 - 3910 CORREA, JORGE MARTINEZ, LILIANA 3200 COCONUT GROVE DR CORAL GABLES FL 33134 - 6827 DEVOCHT, TOM R THE 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 qlmSTEAD, RICHARD E ALMSTEAD, JEAN 31 ALLEGRA CT WHITE PLAINS NY 10603 - 1534 BEF INC D/B/A OAKS OF CLEARWAT 420 BAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5291 BLACKSTONE, JAMIE J ANDRIAN BLACKSTONE, RALF W 1860 VENETIAN POINT DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1752 BOURIKAS, CONSTANTINE BOURIKAS, CHRISTINA 4907 W FAREWELL SKOKIE IL 60077 - 3502 CASSANO, RAYMOND P 100 PIERCE ST # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5115 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 COHEN, LAURA 100 PIERCE ST # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5102 CORBO, ROSALIND J LA POLLA, JAMES P 3442 TANGLEWOOD TER PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 1827 DABBAH, SALOMON DABBAH, ALICIA CASA DE LA MONEDA # 106 COIL 10 DE ADRIL DF CP 11250 00002 - MEXICO DOBIN, BRUCE DOBIN, SHARYN 4 ORCHARD WAY WARREN NJ 07059 - 5056 rDOKUMACI, OZDEMIR •RUMRIGHT, DOLORES F DOKUMACI, AYHAN 3222 SAN PEDRO ST .'100 PIERCE ST # 508 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3537 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 FARCA, RAQUEL FAYEK M & NADIA L BARSOOM 100 PIERCE ST # 409 REVO CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5142 BARSOOM, FAYEK M THE 100 PIERCE ST # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5152 FITZSIMONS, BETTINA R FL SPORT DANCE FEDERATION OF 100 PIERCE ST # 706 A CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5159 483 MANDALAY AVE STE 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2035 FREDERICKS, CLYDE F FRISBY, MICHAEL 100 PIERCE ST # 1102 FRISBY, ADRIANA CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 100 PIERCE ST # PH09 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5156 GLANVILLE, THOMAS O GOOD, EARL W 100 PIERCE ST # 805 GOOD, JOAVA M CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5152 1047 E 13200 S DRAPER UT 84020 - 9399 HARTMAN, DEBORAH HOEKSTRA, BURTON R REHMAN, GLORIA V PAPER, JODI L 100 PIERCE ST # 1103 4501 SUNFLOWER RIDGE DR NE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 ADA MI 49301 - 9672 HUMANE SOCIETY OF PINELLAS INC INANC, DOGAN 3040 STATE ROAD 590 INANC, MERAL CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2500 100 PIERCE ST # 707 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5159 JOYCE, GERTRUDE M HURLEY, MAUREEN J 100 PIERCE ST # 804 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5152 KAMPH, GLORIA A KAMPH, JOCELYN S 100 PIERCE ST # 608 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5116 KATSELAS, MILTON TRUST 254 S ROBERTSON BLVD BEVERLY HILLS CA 90211 - 2827 KILGO, ROBERT 2416 FOXHEAD WAY CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1112 • ELIAS, EDWARD 100 PIERCE ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5155 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CLEARW 331 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002 FRANZONI, MASSIMO 2379 OLD COACH TRL CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1729 GIORGIO, ROBERT P GIORGIO, SHIRLEY D 2757 RAVINE PL NORTH BELLMORE NY 11710 - 1414 HALSEY, BRADFORD HALSEY, LEIZA 100 PIERCE ST # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5158 HUBER, EVA M 17 PLACE ST GERMAIN DES LONGS 92100 BOULOGNE-BILLANCOURT 00017- FRANCE JACKSON, WARNER LOVE-JACKSON, ALICIA 7901 N BERWYN GLENDALE WI 53209 - 1809 KARNS, CLEITA G THE 100 PIERCE ST # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5157 KLIMECZKO, SELMA 1531 SW 106TH TER DAVIE FL 33324 - 7165 KOCHAN, JANE L KOKER, AHMET KOTSIOPOULOS, PETER J 100 PIERCE ST # 1305 KOKER, SUZAN KOTSIOPOULOS, JOHN G CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5156 100 PIERCE ST # 707 591 BRAEMAR LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5159 BARRINGTON IL 60010 - 6517 KRAMER, KAREN L :325 GENERAL CAVAZOS BLVD KINGSVILLE TX 78363 - 7203 LOFGREN, CLIFFORD E LOFGREN, FRANCINE T 100 PIERCE ST # 1207 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5155 LUNDGREN, RICHARD W 100 PIERCE ST # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5117 MATHEIS, HILDEGARD 100 PIERCE ST # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5151 MATHIS, DAVID L SR MATHIS, BONNIE K 11528 TORREY RD FENTON MI 48430 - 9631 MELENDEZ, JORGE A MELENDEZ, DIANE M 4510 OLD ORCHARD DR TAMPA FL 33618 - 8654 MILLER, LAWRENCE T MILLER, CHARLENE A 1400 LILAC LN ADDISON IL 60101 - 5743 NADIR, MICHAEL NADIR, SHEILA 34 MEDALIST RD WILLOWDALE ON M2P 1Y5 00030 - CANADA PEACE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CH 110 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5107 qO, LUCIA WU, STEVE 887 SWISS TRAILS RD DUARTE CA 91010 - LOKEY, PAT 409 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 MARKS, JOHN L 6615 N LEROY AVE LINCOLNWOOD IL 60712 - 3201 MATHERS, ALBERT J MATHERS, FUMEI 8 EVONAIRE CIR BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1603 MC DANIEL, KATHERINE 6459 WYDOWN BLVD ST LOUIS MO 63105 - 2214 MELLISH, KATHY F 100 PIERCE ST # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5141 MILOVIC, NENAD MILOVIC, MARLISE 100 PIERCE ST # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5152 NEWELL, MARGARET C 837 WISCONSIN AVE PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 4250 PIERCE 100 CONDO ASSOCIATION TERRY SUE, 100 PIERCE STREET CLEARWATER, FL 33756 ONG, CHARLES B LANG, CAROLYN K PO BOX 2701 EAST LIVERPOOL OH 43920 - 0701 LUNDA, MILTON THE LUNDA, LYDIA THE PO BOX 669 BLACK RIVER FALLS WI 54615 - 0669 MARTIN, PATRICK A MARTIN, ELENA 23515 WAYNES WAY GOLDEN CO 80401 - 8530 MATHERS, ALBERT J MATHERS, FUMEI PO BOX 2574 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2574 MC PHEE, A LLOYD MC PHEE, DIANE 100 PIERCE ST # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5116 MENKHAUS, EDWARD M MENKHAUS, AMY L 100 PIERCE ST # 507 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 MOORE, ANGELICA 100 PIERCE ST # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5142 OAK BLUFFS CONDO ASSN INC 420 BAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5291 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 PIOTROWSKI, CATHY THE PREMOLI, IOLANDA PREWETT, LUCAS 100 PIERCE ST # 503 VIA SAVONA 12 PREWETT, AGNES J CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 MILAN 20144 00026 - 100 PIERCE ST # 1201 ITALY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5155 'It REGNI, GERALD J JR CHARDSON, JOHN A RIVIERE, LUCILE F 937 CHRISTIAN ST DINAPOLI, RALPH 100 PIERCE ST # 903 -PHILADELPHIA PA 19147 - 3832 101 S DUNTON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5153 E PATCHOGUE NY 11772 - 6161 RODRIGUEZ, JOSE ROME, DANIEL D ROSE, GLENDA RODRIGUEZ, LOURDES ROME, ANNIE K 5060 WOODLAND DR PO BOX 628 100 PIERCE ST # 705 LEWISTON NY 14092 - 1914 LA CANADA CA 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5159 ROTEN, REX A ROTEN, REX A SARAFIAN LIVING TRUST 100 PIERCE ST # 1108 ROTEN, RANDY M 100 PIERCE ST # 1104 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 100 PIERCE ST # 1107 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 SCHEER, ALAN C SCHENKELBERG, CATHY SCHOFNER, VIRGINIA M SCHEER, JOYCE R 4317 BABCOCK AVE 100 PIERCE ST # 506 100 PIERCE ST # 1007 STUDIO CITY CA 91604 - 1512 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5162 SCRIMSHER, RUTH B SGROI, JENNIFER A SHEEHAN, GERALDINE L 100 PIERCE ST # 910 SGROI, ELIZABETH A 14283 NEPTUNE DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5118 981 COLLEGE HILL DR SEMINOLE FL 33776 - 1048 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2313 SIMON, CHARLES SPATUZZI, FRANK L ST CLAIR, ARLENE F SIMON, MARINA SPATUZZI, INGE 1045 FAIRFAX ST 100 PIERCE ST # 1106 100 PIERCE ST # 601 BIRMINGHAM MI 48009 - 1286 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5154 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5151 STACK, MALCOLM G STEFANCHIK, NICHOLAS SR SUPLEE, SUSAN W TRUST 531 N PINCKNEY ST 100 PIERCE ST # 307 400 ROBERTS RD MADISON WI 53703 - 1431 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5102 BRYN MAWR PA 19010 - TARBERT, UPTON H TETZLAFF & VISCO REVOCABLE TRELA, CHRISTINE M TARBERT, HARRIET W FAM 4101 PARAMOUNT BLVD # 94 100 PIERCE ST # 1203 TETZLAFF, TERRY JOEL THE PICO RIVERA CA 90660 - 6090 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5155 100 PIERCE ST # 907 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5118 TURNER, TERRY S URBANEK, ANN M URBANEK, ANN M 100 PIERCE ST # 710 100 PIERCE ST # 1306 1909 MALORY LN STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5159 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5156 FRANKLIN TN 37067 - 8230 WAGENVOORD, DAVID WEIR, J MICHAEL WILLEBRANDS, ELSA M WAGENVOORD, LOLA 100 PIERCE ST # 908 213 AVA RD 2360 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5118 TORONTO ON M6C 1W9 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2216 CANADA r WILSON, WARD A SR fnINTEREGG, GREGORY A ETTER, LISA L 100 PIERCE ST # 502 WINTEREGG, SANDRA K ALTINTOP, JOHN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5101 7350 WOLF RUN SHOALS RD 10274 KALUA DR FAIRFAX STATION VA 22039 - 2010 SUNLAND CA 91040 - 1515 ZARGAR, MOHSEN E ZARGAR, JAN I N E 62 SHERWOOD AVE GREENWICH CT 06831 - 3250 r CITY OF CLEARWATER s NOTICE OF COi UNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBL EARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 19, 2006, beginning at 2:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont'd from 11-21-06) Dorothy B. LeBlanc and Sexton Enterprises, Inc. (Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a restaurant in the Commercial District with a reduction to the lot width from 100 ft to 89.77 ft (south along Dempsey St), reductions to the front (north along Lakeview Rd) setback from 25 ft to 18.1 ft (to existing building), from 25 ft to 14 ft (to sidewalk) and from 25 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (south along Dempsey St) from 25 ft to 1-ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 29.5 ft (to existing midpoint of the pitched roof), a reduction to the required parking from 43 spaces to 16 spaces and a deviation to allow direct access to Lakeview Rd, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C, with reductions to the perimeter landscape buffers along Lakeview Rd from 15 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), along Dempsey St from 10 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and along the east from 5 ft to 3 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the interior landscape requirement from 10 percent to 5.5 percent and a reduction to the foundation landscape area from 5 ft wide to zero ft wide, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant.) at 921 Lakeview Rd., Lake Belleview Add, Blk 1, Lots 13-15 & part of Lot 16, & Lots 17-21. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-05032 2. Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC. (Clearwater Gardens Condo) is requesting Flexible Development approval for 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Sec. 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (18 units)] at 601 N. Ft. Harrison Ave. Nicholson & Sloan's Add, Lot 1 & Bidwell's Oak Wood Add, Lots 19-20. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-06041 3. New Horizons Properties, LLC and Affordable Dental, LLC. (Mako Condominiums) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to ht from 30 ft to 46.2 ft (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 ft for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 15.3 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-4041 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 ft to 5 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings (11 units)] at 240 & 250 Skiff Point, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A, Lots 40-41. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-07045 4. Church of Scientology Religious Trust is requesting Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office/overnight accommodations mixed-use (112,739 sq. ft) (Phase 1) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court St. under the provisions of Sec. 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Office/Overnight Accommodations (Phase 1) and Overnight Accomfnodations (Phase ?t 210 S. Osceola Ave. Oak Cove A ercial Condo Unit 1, t AKA Floors 1 & 3 -13, Un'Ir2, AKA Convalescent Area. Assigned nner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-04019/TDR2006-11032 5. William S. Boozer/, Line-X of Tampa Bay is requesting Flexible Development Approval to allow a Limited Vehicle Service use in addition to an existing Retail Sales and Service use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the minimum number of parking spaces from 20 spaces to 7 spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 5 ft (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to match the existing building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Sec. 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Limited Vehicle Service) at 19080 US Hwy 19 N. Sec.19-29-16, M & B 14.11. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006-08048 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi- judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross- examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go tohttp://cearwater.granicus.comNiewPublisher.php?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 12/7/06 CITY OF CLEARWATER f, I r? . t NOTICE OF CAUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBAEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 19, 2006, beginning at 2:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont'd from 11-21-06) Dorothy B. LeBlanc and Sexton Enterprises, Inc. (Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a restaurant in the Commercial District with a reduction to the lot width from 100 ft to 89.77 ft (south along Dempsey St), reductions to the front (north along Lakeview Rd) setback from 25 ft to 18.1 ft (to existing building), from 25 ft to 14 ft (to sidewalk) and from 25 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (south along Dempsey St) from 25 ft to 1-ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 29.5 ft (to existing midpoint of the pitched roof), a reduction to the required parking from 43 spaces to 16 spaces and a deviation to allow direct access to Lakeview Rd, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C, with reductions to the perimeter landscape buffers along Lakeview Rd from 15 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), along Dempsey St from 10 ft to 1 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and along the east from 5 ft to 3 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the interior landscape requirement from 10 percent to 5.5 percent and a reduction to the foundation landscape area from 5 ft wide to zero ft wide, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant.) at 921 Lakeview Rd., Lake Belleview Add, Blk 1, Lots 13-15 & part of Lot 16, & Lots 17-21. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-05032 2. Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC. (Clearwater Gardens Condo) is requesting Flexible Development approval for 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Sec. 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (18 units)] at 601 N. Ft. Harrison Ave, Nicholson & Sloan's Add, Lot 1 & Bidwell's Oak Wood Add, Lots 19-20. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-06041 3. New Horizons Properties, LLC and Affordable Dental, LLC. (Mako Condominiums) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 11 attached dwellings within the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District / Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD) with an increase to ht from 30 ft to 46.2 ft (roof deck) with an additional 10.3 ft for a mechanical equipment enclosure, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 15.3 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-4045 of the Community Development Code; and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer widths along the east and west sides of the property from 10 ft to 5 ft as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Plan under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings (11 units)] at 240 & 250 Skiff Point, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5-A, Lots 40-41. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-07045 4. Church of Scientology Religious Trust is requesting Flexible Development approval for the conversion of an existing dormitory to a interim office/overnight accommodations mixed-use (112,739 sq. ft) (Phase 1) and subsequently to a permanent overnight accommodations use (251 rooms) within the Downtown (D) District as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec. 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2006-11032) of 81 overnight accommodation units from the property located at 652 Court St. under the provisions of Sec. 4-1402 and 4-1403 of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Office/Overnight Accommodations (Phase 1) and Overnight Aommodations (Phase I.t 210 S. Osceola Ave. Oak Cove A Coercial Condo Unit 1, i AKA Floors 1 & 3 -13, U11 2, AKA Convalescent Area. Assigned PlMner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-04019/TDR2006-11032 5. William S. Boozer/, Line-X of Tampa Bay is requesting Flexible Development Approval to allow a Limited Vehicle Service use in addition to an existing Retail Sales and Service use in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the minimum number of parking spaces from 20 spaces to 7 spaces; a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 5 ft (to pavement); and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to match the existing building), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Sec. 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Limited Vehicle Service) at 19080 US Hwy 19 N. Sec.19-29-16, M & B 14.11. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD2006-08048 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi- judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross- examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC City Clerk A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go tohtto://clearwater.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 12/7/06 f • Check list for CDB Agenda & Application sent to City Clerks Office FLD2006-06041 Application Form Parcel ID 601 N Fort Harrison Ave Letter of Authorization Survey or Legal Description 2X2 Map Large Scale YES OR NO INITIALS Sherry Watkins 6 FLD20066-06041 601 N FT HARRISON AVE LEARWATER GARDENS COND PLANNER OF RECORD: R T ATLAS # 277B ZONING: D LAND USE: CBD RECEIVED: 06/30/2006 INCOMPLETE: COMPLETE: MAPS: PHOTOS: STAFF REPORT: DRC: CDB: CLWCoverSheet Pinellas County Property Apprat Information: 09 29 15 60120 000 00 Page 2 of 4 09 / 29 / 15 / 00120 / 000 / 0010 17-Oct-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:53:13 Ownership Information Hon-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TEZARIS & BIEBER AQUISITIONS LLC OBK: 14943 OPG: 0316 4965 W BREEZE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683-1126 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 601 H F T HARRISON AUE of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 261.00 sales from 2004 - 2005: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,006 14,943/ 316 950,000 (Q) I 1912: Book 001 Pgs 038- 11/2,004 13,94611,881 400,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/2,003 13,299/ 627 250,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 9 /1,998 10,230/1,648 220,000 (Q) I 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 600,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 600,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 600,000 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 5,841.83 1) 172 x 167 20.00 29, 053.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 13, 058.40 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 13, 058.40 Short Legal NICHOLSON & SLOAN+S ADD LOT i AND BIDWELL'S OAK Description WOOD ADD LOTS 19 & 20 Building Information http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=09+29+15+6012... 10/17/2006 Pinellas County Property Appra r Information: 09 29 15 60120 000 00 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descri try ions 0 29 / 15 1 00120 1 000 1 0010 :01 17-Oct-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:53:14 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Service Garage Property Address: 601 N FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 345 Land Use: 27 Structural Elomonts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fram Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish Hone Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Fair Year Built 1,988 Effective Age i5 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub AroaS Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,838 7) .00 0 2) Canopy .20 403 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commc r c i a1 E xt r a F c at ur c s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 10080 1.75 10,080 17,640 17,640 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 17.640 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=09+29+15+6012... 10/17/2006 Pinellas County Property Apprat Information: 09 29 15 60120 000 00i) Page 4 of 4 Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://136.174.187.13/htbin/egi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=09+29+15+6012... 10/17/2006 ?r Y Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1 , 2 0 5.0 0 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: JUL 112006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT' C17Y OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL RECEIVED * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/28/2006) "PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT" A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Mark N. Tezaris, Owner APPLICANT NAME: Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 4965 W Breeze Circle, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (347) 683-6715 FAXNUMBER: (718) 408-3276 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Mark N. Tezaris List ALL owners on the deed Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC AGENT NAME: Frank C Schlotter, P.E. _ MAILING ADDRESS: 6885 Copperfield Drive, New Port Richey, FL 34655-5603 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 372-9256 FAX NUMBER: (727) 372-4586 CELL NUMBER: (727).992-0150 _ E-MAILADDRESS: schlotter0l@msn.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED USE(S): Clearwater Gardens Condo PROJECT VALUATION A01 .__North Fort Harris6ft Avenue 0120/0 _ 0. 6 52 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): _ 28,485 Parcel I, Lot 1, Nicholson & Sloan S/D, P.B. 1, Page 38 Parcel II Lots 19 & 20, Bidwells Oakwood Addition to 461 . ,_____,G earwa er, , g- DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Redevelop _existing_car wash to luxury condominiums Request flexibility of maximum allowable density--from 16 to 18 units by participation in a street scape program. Request flexibilty of landscape plan and bufferinq requirements $ 9,000.000 S:\Planning Department\Application Form s\d evelopm ent review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 1 of 8 • • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES_ NO_ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) YJ SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) (S Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. CGC will be in harmony with the Old Bay District redevelopment plan- Optimum density can be achieved with flexible standards, while minimizing FAR coverage. CGC will be a catalyst for neighboring properties redevel- ment, (adjoining old apartment building and boat repair yard). 2.1 The proposed development will"not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Clearwater Gardens Luxury Condominiums will greatly improve the value of existing neighboring properties and encourage like redevelopment / consistent with the Old Bay District plan. 3 The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. CGC will provide a safe and secure environment for residents and not create a source of uncontrolled pollution Expanding the tax base will provide additional financial resources to support public health services 4. % The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. CGC will provide off-street parking for 2 spaces per unit plus 2 H/C spaces and allows ample room to pull-off out of the roadway and into the property. CGC is close to downtown Clearwater and therefore pedestrian friendly 5_1. The proposed deOetopment is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development CGC character is mediterranean architectural style and is consistent with neighboring redevelopemn-t_projects such as Scientology buildings, proposed Island View, Harrison Village and others in.the vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Landscaping and building textures will soften adverse acoutic impacts. CGC will be attractive, inviting, appealing and:..desirable to residents and neighbors An enclosed dumpster will be provided, emptied and sanitized twice weekly for garbage collection and disposal. r,?t, ?:IV??t? JUL 11 2006 S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Form s\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01_doc Page 2 of 8 t'IAAPdNING (DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RECEWED JUL 11 2006 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Crltift*?r' CLEARWATER $) Provide complete responses to the eight (8) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: I,. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. Flexibility with landscape buffering and density requirements will allow achievement of optimal economic feasibility, while adhering to building setback lines and maximum height limitations. Streetscaping is offered as compensation for above mentioned flexibi ity. 2.. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this. Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district rr_r nrnnnSP_8 redevelopment is consistent with the Old Bay District plan ,,,,a moA+ r-ri teria for permitted uses, zoning and density stanaaras. /3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. CGC proposed use of residential luxury condominiums is consistent with -neighborhood land uses and will compliment and support other uses, such as retail and professional and will not impede orderly redevelopmen (4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development CGC will immediately help to upgrade the neighborhood in terms of desirability and property market values. CGC will not be a detriment to any adjoining properties tothe best of our knowledge. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following lectives: J ( The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or fle)dble development use; 'b' The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, --,-d.'. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. CGC fits-in perfectly with the Old Bay District and the City of Clearwater's redevelopment plans and is consistent with permitted _land uses zoning and redevelopment standards. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of UIC lullu1 IIV u-V, I -J--- a: The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement o the surrounding properties or uses permitted in this zoning district; b.' The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c.. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: Changes in horizontal building planes; Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; Variety in materials, colors and textures; Distinctive fenestration patterns; Building stepbacks; and T!t' Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The mediterranean architectural style of CGC will enhance the character of the neighborhood increase community pride and provide luxury homes to new res i dents-.- S:\Planning Department\Application Form s\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 3 of 8 0 • E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. D If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; Pf"' Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property fines; %-X' Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ta?' All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems, Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet oontrol structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with ?O the City manual. ti" Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. . If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) Pa." SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ?a TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing heel TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; e LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or riot deviations to the parking standards are approved; 1a GRADING PLAN, as applicable; O PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; dK1%711i1 ik RECEIl 0 JUL 11 2006 '^'JANNING DF-1-ARTMFN'!' S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (9Ay2Q b.Q"V1AYle.P Page 4 of 8 i • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access, All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fin: hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening _ {per Section 3-201(D)(1) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. 9p SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number.of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use, Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. K REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8!/2 X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; PROPOSED ORIGINAL RECEIVED JUL 11 2000 PLMNING DEPARTMENT CITY GE GLEARWATE- S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\2006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 5 of 8 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) RECEIVED ViH. LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): JUL 1 1 2006 All existing and proposed structures; PLANNING DEPA-k€1?:3 Names of abutting streets; CITY OF Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant _ schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions. soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board), Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %: X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) V( BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 % X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. S:\Planning Department\Application Form s\developm ent review\2006 Form s\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 6 of 8 11 I K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) t] Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. D1 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each tuming movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. X Traffic Impact Study is not required. """CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. $I Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): &49a?,- Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CAUTION IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative Mark N. Tezaris, Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this 3 0 day of June A.D. 20___oj6_ to me and/or by who is ppersonal own has produced i P, E 0 R' L I t? Y MCI as identifi apn. l i Notary public, My commission expires: t It is ;`; Q k. ;f„ 'i A.. •_m.._.. r,n3€i5564 c F e .? F.xrires October 24. 2003 S:0anning DepartmentlApplication Forms\development review\2006 Form s\Com preh ensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 7 of 8 .' I N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property. owners on deed - PRINT full names: Mark N.._ Tzaris, Owner Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 601 North. Fort Harrison Avenue 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Redevelopment Permit 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Frank C. Schlotter, P.E. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. Thant"), the urort i ned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property" er Property Owner Mark N. Tezaris Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner 30th day of who having been first duly sworn Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this June , 2006 personally appeared Mark N. Tezaris Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Public Signature Notary Seal/Stamp My Commission Expires: my P?at??????Ap'P Fxrire% october 24, 2000 S:1Planning DepartmentWpplication Form sldevelopment review12006 Forms\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2006.01.doc Page 8 of 8 I A Y. A _° Narwa, ter ?C U 0 Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562.4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded Into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ • CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL TWO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 03/27/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Mark N. Tezaris, Owner APPLICANT NAME: Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 4965 W. Breeze Circle, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (347) 683-6715 FAX NUMBER: (718) 408-3276 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Mark N. Tezaris, Owner Ust ALL owners on Ow deW Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC AGENT NAME: Frank C. Schlotter, P . E . MAILING ADDRESS: 6885 Copperfield Drive, New Port Richey, FL 34655-5603 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 372-9256 FAX NUMBER: (727) 372-4586 CELL NUMBER: (727) 992-01 50 E-MAIL ADDRESS: schlotterO1 @msn. com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Gardens PROJECT VALUATION: S 9,000,000 STREET ADDRESS: 601 N. Fort Harrison-Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 09/29/15/60120/000/0010 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.652 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 2 8 , 4 8 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel I, Lot 1, Nicholson & Sloan SID, P.B. 1, Page 38 Parcel II, Lots 19 & 20, Bidwells Oakwood Add., P.B. 1 HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? Two 0 HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? IS THERE A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES NO X IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: C:IIMNDOWSITEMPOR-ltCONTENT.IE5IADAXY5Y51PublicAmeniliaslnoenlimPool UseApp/cabon2Mdoc sRFECEIVR') Page I of 2 1U1_.1 12006 PLANNING DEEPARTMEN'! CITY O!"CL EAP\MATO? V C. SIGNATURE: L_A_ i 2(_o2. ?4 b I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative Mark N. Tezaris, Property Owner O 1 D(.P-1 C) STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me this 1 1 thday of July AD.20 06 to me and/or by who is personally known has produced Driver's License iVV0 Notary puc, My commission Tres: PROVIDE A LETE DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENITIES PROPOSED TO BE PROVIDED (attach drawings, photographs, etc. as applicable): 1). Sidewalk pavers in front of property on North Fort Harrison to match patterns chosen by the City of Clearwater. Pavers will continue on the entrance Driveway. 2). One or more park-type benches on sidewalk in front of property. 3). Landscaping, (see landscaping plan). 4). Any other reasonable requests by the City of Clearwater. ......... ...................................y SHERRY L. WATKINS f `,atirpr Ooncn/t?00?M/N ftu (M)432-4M: Florida Notary Am.. Ina ......................................... t C:IWNDOKIMTEMPOR-MONTENrlE51ADAXY5Y51Public Amenmes IncentNe Paul Uss Applicahon2006.dac Page 2 of 2 ORIGINAL RECENED JUL. s_ 1 2006 P"NNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CCE! PIWATFP 0 Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded Into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL TWO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 03/27/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Mark N. Tezaris, Owner APPLICANT NAME: Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 4965 W. Breeze Circle, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 PHONE NUMBER: (347) 683-6715 FAX NUMBER: (718) 408-3276 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Mark N. Tezaris, Owner Ust ALL owners on the deW Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, LLC AGENT NAME: Frank C. Schlotter, P . E . MAILING ADDRESS: 6885 Copperfield Drive, New Port Richey, FL 34655-5603 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 372-9256 FAX NUMBER: (727) 372-4586 CELL NUMBER: (727) 992-01 50 E-MAIL ADDRESS: schlotter0l@msn.com 8. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Clearwater Gardens PROJECT VALUATION: $ 9, 000, 000 STREET ADDRESS: 601 N. Fort Harrison Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 PARCEL NUMBER(S): 09/29/15/601,20/000/0010 PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0.652 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 2 8 , 4 8 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel I, Lot 1, Nicholson & Sloan S/D, P.B. 1, Page 38 Parcel II, Lots 19 & 20, Bidwells Oakwood Add., P.B. 1 HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? Two HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? 0 IS THERE A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES NO X IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: C,%MNDOWSITEMPOR-11CONTENT.IE514DAXY5Y51Pubdc Amenities Incentive Pod Use Applimbon 2006.doc R EWE[ r Page I of 2 U L I 12006 i i.Ahii ING DEPAI2TM'4' CITY OF CLEAK ATEM • 0 PROVIDE A LETE DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENITIES PROPOSED TO BE PROVIDED (attach drawings, photographs, etc. as applicable): 1). Sidewalk pavers in front of property on North Fort Harrison to match patterns chosen by the City of Clearwater. Pavers will continue on the entrance Driveway. 2). One or more park-type benches on sidewalk in front of property. 3). .Landscaping,.(see landscaping plan). 4). Any other reasonable requests by the. City of Clearwater. C. SIGNATURE: 2& Z S4 D Co i C)(p-1 C:) 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS in this application are true and accurate to the best of my Swom to and subscribed before me this 1 1 thday of knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and July . AD. 20 to me and/or by photograph the property described in this application. who is personally known has produced Driver's License _ ideM?cation. , k_h yy <Z) Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, Mark N. Tezaris, Property Owner Mycommissione Tres: ............ ..................... .«...w..? .?.N. SHERRY L WATKINS = ``?~?r , Oonrrrr?COWMIN = :i?ffs Of R6A ..... f0NotaAum. trrc .................................... ORIGINAL C: IWNDOWS%TEMPOR-IMNTENT IE5WDAXY5Y51Pubhc Amenhw 11WW Ne Pod Use AppbcabM 2" dac Page 2 of 2 RECEI'VED JUL. 1 12906 i'LANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATE i • LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW December 19, 2006 Mr. Frank C. Schlotter 6885 Copperfield Drive New Port Richey, FL 34655 • 4 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLF:ARWATER, FI.ORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICIis BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR?n.E AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-06041 (601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue) Dear Mr. Schlotter: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 19, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development request to permit 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.652 acre subject property is located along the east side of North Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately 220 feet south of Eldridge Street; 2. That the property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as the property is located within the Old Bay character district; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the area; 2. That the proposed use of two (2) attached dwellings from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Old Bay character district; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-903.B and 2-903.C of the"Community Development Code; and 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. PRANK 1111MARD, MAYOR John Dm'\N, COUNcir•NU:,\1m:R 110)-1 I IANI LION, C:ci MAIAIP.NIRIT 1311.1.JOnsON, CO(1K(J1.MF:N1BF:R CARI-FN A. Priny,Sm, COI Ncll-yI %1111:R "EQUAL ENIFLOY,MENT AND ArmIMATIvF: A<°TION 1"MPLOYFK" 0 Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the wrought iron security gates must be eliminated and revised plans submitted depicting such; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans shall be revised to depict a six-foot high rear wall for the refuse enclosure; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the proposed swing gates with privacy slats shall be replaced with a material (wood, vinyl, etc.) consistent with the Code and Design Guidelines; 4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, shall be placed underground; 5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall deed or dedicate an easement over all unrestricted water lines, hydrants and backflow prevention devices; 6. That the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from any building and/or entry wall. 7. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 8. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 9. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by December 19, 2007); and 11. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of a Flexible Development approval (by December 19, 2007). All required Certificates of Occupancy must be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert. to fft@myclearwater. com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S. (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationsTt Harrison Ave N0601 -Clearwater Gardens (D) - ApprovedlFt Harrison Ave N 601 - Development Order 12-19-06.doc 0 CDB Meeting Date: November 21, 2006 Case Number: FLD2006-06041 Agenda Item: E. 1. Owner/Applicant: Tezaris & Bieber Aquisitions, Inc. Agent: Frank C. Schlotter, P.E. Address: 601 North Fort Harrison Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development request to permit 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. CURRENT ZONING: Downtown (D) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Central Business District (CBD) CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Old Bay PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Limited Vehicle Service (Car/Boat Wash) Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings EXISTING North: Downtown (D) District Vacant SURROUNDING ZONING South: Downtown (D) District Attached Dwellings AND USES: East: Downtown (D) District Retail Sales and Services West: Downtown (D) District Attached Dwellings, and Offices ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The subject property totals 0.652 acres and is located along the east side of North Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately 220 feet south of Eldridge Street within the Downtown (D) District. Additionally, the property is located within Old Bay character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The subject property consists of an abandoned limited vehicle service use (car/boat wash) with the surrounding area consisting of attached dwellings, detached dwellings, offices, and retail sales and service uses. These surrounding uses are located within structures that are between one and three stories in height. Development Proposal: Density: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable density for attached dwellings on parcels of land less than two acres in size located west of Garden Avenue within the Old Bay character district is 25 dwelling units per acre. Thus, the 0.652-acre subject property is permitted 16 attached dwellings. However, the development proposal is for 18 attached dwellings (two Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 1 • • more than permissible); therefore the applicant has requested the use of two (2) attached dwellings from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool as made available by the Plan. The development proposal's compliance with the requirements for the use of these attached dwellings from the Pool is discussed later in the staff report. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable building height on parcels of land located east of Osceola Avenue within the Old Bay character district is 40 feet. The proposed building has a height of 39.6 feet, which is within the maximum allowable height. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code, the minimum off-street parking requirement for attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District is 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Based upon the above, the proposed 18-unit development requires a minimum of 27 parking spaces and has provided for 38 - a ratio of 2.1 parking spaces per dwelling unit. It is noted that the parking consists of two (2) handicap accessible parking spaces and 18 two-car vertical stack garages (one garage per unit). The vertical stack garages allow for two vehicles to be parked within the garage and for either vehicle to be removed at any given time without necessitating the prior removal of the other vehicle from the garage. Solid Waste Containers and Mechanical Equipment: Pursuant to Section 3-201.D.1 of the Community Development Code, all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment shall be completely screened from view from public streets and abutting properties by a fence, gate, wall, mounds of earth, or vegetation. The development proposal includes the provision of a dumpster enclosure at the rear of the property. The enclosure consists of six-foot high concrete block side walls, an eight-foot high concrete block rear wall and six-foot high swing gates with privacy slats. It is noted that the provision of an eight-foot high rear wall is inconsistent with the height standards set forth in Section 3-804.13 of the Community Development Code, which limits rear walls to a maximum height of six feet. Therefore, it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans must be revised to depict a six-foot high rear wall for the refuse enclosure. Further, Section 3-805.A of the Community Development Code and the Downtown Design Guidelines state that chain link fences are not permitted within the Downtown (D) District. The proposed swing gates with privacy slats must therefore be replaced with a material (wood, vinyl, etc.) consistent with the Code and Design Guidelines, and said replacement has been attached as a condition of approval to be met prior to the issuance of any building permits. The development proposal also includes both pad-mounted (transformer) and roof-mounted (air- conditioning) mechanical equipment. The pad-mounted mechanical equipment is located interior to the development and will be screened by the proposed building as well as landscaping. The roof-mounted mechanical equipment will be centered atop the building so as to limit its visibility and furthered screened by six-foot high vinyl fencing. Utilities: Pursuant to Section 3-911 of the Community Development Code, for development that does not involve a subdivision, all utilities including individual distribution lines shall be installed underground unless such undergrounding is not practicable. It is therefore attached as a condition of approval that all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, are to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Signag_e: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 2 Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The subject property is located within the Old Bay character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan identifies the Old Bay character district as a transitional area between the Downtown Core and the low density residential areas to the north. Further, the Plan envisions the district to be a mixed-use neighborhood supporting the Downtown employment base with residential, limited neighborhood commercial and office uses. Public Amenities Incentive Pool: To assist in the transformation of downtown Clearwater into a quality place in which to live, work and play, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes a Public Amenities Incentive Pool of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non- residential uses. The applicant is proposing the use of two (2) dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. In order to justify this request from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool the development proposal includes the provision of streetscape improvements on North Fort Harrison Avenue consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the provision of this amenity, which is consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the request for two (2) dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool can be supported. Downtown Design Guidelines: The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with regard to various elements associated with new construction in the Downtown. A review of these guidelines within the Plan was conducted and the following applicable items were identified: Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that driveways shall be functionally integrated into the design of the development; that parking lots shall be located behind the primary fagade of the principle building; and that the use of interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials shall be used for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. The driveway for the development has been designed to pass through/beneath the building, thereby allowing for a continuous building fagade along North Fort Harrison Avenue while still permitting vehicular/pedestrian access to the rear of the property. Through this design the driveway has been functionally integrated into the design of the development. The off-street parking associated with the development will be located at the rear of the property behind not only the primary fagade, but also the principle building. Finally, the development includes the provision of substantial paver brick accents at the driveway flare and the initial throat of the driveway. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with the above applicable Guidelines. Pedestrian Circulation/Access: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways should be provided between streets, parking areas and buildings; and that specialized paving designs shall be incorporated where pedestrian and vehicular paths intersect. The development proposal incorporates a four-foot (4') wide walkway connecting the North Fort Harrison Avenue sidewalk, the building stairways/elevators and the rear garages. The proposal also incorporates a paver brick pedestrian walkway across the drive aisle to join the two halves of the building separated by the driveway. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with the above applicable Guidelines. Buffering and Screening: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. The development proposal includes the provision of a dumpster enclosure at the rear of the property, which will ultimately consist of six-foot high concrete block walls and swing gates consistent with the Community Development Code and the Design Guidelines (see above with regard to Solid Waste Containers and Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 3 • • Mechanical Equipment). The development proposal also includes both pad-mounted (transformer) and roof-mounted (air-conditioning) mechanical equipment. The pad-mounted mechanical equipment is located interior to the development and will be screened by the proposed building as well as landscaping. The roof-mounted mechanical equipment will be centered atop the building so as to limit its visibility and furthered screened by six-foot high vinyl fencing. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with the above applicable Guidelines. Fences and Walls: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that fences and walls shall compliment and be consistent with the principal structure with regard to materials, texture, size, shape and color. The development proposal includes the provision of a six-foot (6') high, white, wrought iron fence with intermittent stucco finish pilaster columns along portions of the north, west and south property lines as well as along the east bank of the retention pond. In addition, a four-foot (4') high version of this fence is proposed around the clubhouse/swimming pool area. As proposed, the fence and columns will be consistent with the materials, texture, size, shape and color of the principle structure; therefore the development proposal complies with the above applicable Guidelines. Coverajze: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall maintain the build-to line or the setback of the development's block and the block(s) across the street. The proposed building has a setback that varies between 6.5 feet and 43 feet with an average of 23.78 feet. The existing adjacent building to the south is set back approximately 20 feet, and there are no developments with measurable setbacks on either the property to the north or those properties across North Fort Harrison Avenue. It is noted that the subject property includes a retention pond at the southwest corner of the site that not only accommodates drainage for the subject property as currently developed, but also for the adjacent property to the south. As such, the retention area cannot be eliminated or relocated without substantial detriment to the adjacent property. Therefore, the subject property will be redeveloped around this existing retention area. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guideline. Rhythm/SpggiM The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". The proposed building "base" is defined through the use of several elements: a stringcourse at the sill height of the second level windows, the incorporation of a distinct "large block" scoring pattern and through the enclosure of the first/second level building projections in contrast to the third/fourth levels. The proposed building "cap" is similarly defined through the use of several elements: a stringcourse at the sill height of the fourth level windows, the use of a distinct stucco wall treatment, window surrounds and a decorative parapet consisting of cultured stone balustrades and ornate rounded parapet elements. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guideline. Primary and Corner Fagades: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the primary fagades shall be the most highly designed fagades and utilize plane changes (i.e. projections and recesses), architectural details, variety in color, material and textures, and storefront display windows for retail uses. The proposed architectural elevations include several of the prescribed design elements noted above. Plane changes are incorporated into the building in the form of projections that are enclosed on the first and second levels and open (as balconies) on the third and fourth levels. The elevations also incorporate variation in color (discussed later in this report), material and texture through the utilization of stucco wall treatments, distinctive score lines and differing column styles. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guideline. Other Architectural Features: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the use of visible, permanent or roll-down security bars/gates is inappropriate within the downtown. The development proposal Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 4 includes the provision of decorative wrought iron security gates across the drive aisle, which as per the above is not permissible for development within the downtown. The applicant has requested that the gates be allowed and has indicated that the gates would be kept open during daylight hours and closed at night. While this may seem a fair compromise, the ability to achieve continual, successful regulation of when the gates are actually open or closed is impractical if not impossible. In addition to the above, the functionality of the gates is also in question. While it is presumed under the applicant's proposal that residents would open the gates at night via a remote control, it is unclear as to how the gates would be opened at night by a guest as the development proposal does not include a call box for guests to contact residents or even an adequate location for any such call box should it be provided. Further, with the provision of the gates the development proposal lacks any form of turn around area before the gates that would enable a vehicle to safely egress the site on to North Fort Harrison Avenue. Regardless of when the gates would be open or closed, the means by which the timeframes for the gates would be regulated, how guest access would be accommodated, or how vehicles not obtaining access would safely egress back on to North Fort Harrison Avenue, the fact remains that pursuant to the Downtown Design Guidelines "visible, permanent or roll-down security bars/gates " are not permissible within the downtown. Therefore, it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of a Development Order the wrought iron security gates must be eliminated and revised plans are submitted depicting such. Color: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the number and type of building colors should be appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. The proposed building colors are appropriate for the architectural style of the building and consist of off-white (Cape Honey Flower - OL#B16-1) for the top of the principle building and garage walls, the clubhouse and as trim for the fence columns; pale yellow (Sand Trap - OL#B16-2) for the middle of the principle building; peach (Apple Crunch - OL#B 16-3) for the bottom of the principle building and garage walls, the fascia and trim of the clubhouse and the fencing; and white (Alabaster - SW7008) for the columns, medallion and horizontal trim of the principle building and garage. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guideline. Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the following applicable Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified: ? Vision: Downtown Clearwater is a major center of activity, business and governments. The development proposal will establish 18 additional attached dwellings in the Downtown. The establishment of these additional dwellings will further this vision by bringing more people to live in the Downtown. ? Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. The development proposal is consistent with the above in that it will provide 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown. Based upon the above, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues should be redeveloped as pedestrian oriented streets and in conjunction with Cleveland Street form the major retail core of Downtown. The subject property has approximately 172 linear feet of frontage along North Fort Harrison Avenue; and while the development proposal does not include retail floor area along this right-of-way, this portion of North Fort Harrison Avenue will be redeveloped to provide greater pedestrian connectivity. Further, Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 5 • • the addition of more residential dwellings in the downtown/Old Bay will improve the viability/sustainability of existing and future retail businesses in the area. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Vision statement. ? Vision: An adequate parking supply must be available coterminous with new uses. As previously discussed under the Minimum Off-Street Parking analysis, the development proposal requires a minimum of 27 parking spaces and will provide a 38 parking spaces. Therefore, the development proposal exceeds the minimum requirements of code and is consistent with this Vision statement. ? Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the Downtown Design Guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The development proposal will provide for 18 attached dwellings within an attractive residential development. As set forth in this staff report, the development proposal has been found to be consistent with the Plan, the Old Bay character district, the Design Guidelines, the Downtown zoning district and therefore, this Objective. ? Objective 1 G: Residential uses in the Downtown are encouraged with a variety of densities, housing types and affordability consistent with the character districts. The development proposal will provide for 18 attached dwellings within the Old Bay character district and includes a variety of unit types and sizes. The dwellings consist of two-bedroom units between 1,248 and 1,384 square feet, and three-bedroom units between 1,646 and 1,782 square feet. Based upon the above, this Objective has been met. ? Objective II: The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provides for a Public Amenities Incentive Pool from which development proposals may acquire additional dwelling units in excess of what the applicable density restrictions would otherwise allow. This development proposal includes a request to utilize two (2) dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ? Objective 21: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes the provision of streetscape improvements along North Fort Harrison Avenue that are consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan; thus compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ? Policy 1: The Downtown Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. As previously discussed, the development proposal is consistent with the various aspects of the Downtown Design Guidelines including, but not limited to: Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking, Pedestrian Circulation/Access, Buffering and Screening, Fences and Walls, Coverage, Rhythm/Spacing, Primary and Corner Fagades and Color. However, the development proposal is inconsistent with the Design Guidelines with regard to Other Architectural Features as the development proposal includes the provision of decorative wrought iron security gates across the drive aisle, which as per the above referenced provision is not permissible for development within the downtown. Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition of approval regarding the elimination of the proposed security gate, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. As discussed later in this staff report, the development proposal is Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 6 found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Old Bay character district. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The architectural elevations have been designed at a pedestrian scale while not necessary stimulating pedestrian interaction. However, the pedestrian environment shall nonetheless be improved through the provision of 18 new attached dwelling units within the downtown in-lieu of the existing car/boat wash facility. In addition, the development proposal includes streetscape improvements along the North Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan that will improve the pedestrian environment. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development proposal will utilize two (2) dwelling units from the Pool, and in compensation provide streetscape improvements on North Fort Harrison Avenue consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the above, compliance with this Policy has been achieved. ? Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. The development proposal will provide several amenities for the residents, including: a clubhouse, swimming pool and two rooftop spas. Based upon the above, the development proposal has provided sufficient amenities for the scale of the project and is consistent with the above Policy. Old Bay Character District Policies: The following applicable policies shall govern development within the District, as well as City actions: ? The Public Incentives Amenities Pool shall not be available to any property located on the west side of Osceola Avenue between Eldridge Street and the northern boundary of the Old Bay character district. The subject property is located to the east of Osceola Avenue and south of Eldridge Street; therefore it is eligible for the Public Amenities Incentive Pool from which the project proposes the use of two (2) dwelling units. ? New development on North Fort Harrison Avenue shall be oriented toward the street to encourage pedestrian activity and a dynamic street life. The proposed building has been oriented towards the North Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way and the architectural elevations designed at a pedestrian scale although not necessarily stimulating pedestrian interaction. However, the pedestrian environment shall nonetheless be improved and the envisioned dynamic street life enhanced through the provision of 18 new attached dwelling units within the downtown in-lieu of the existing car/boat wash facility. In addition, the development proposal includes streetscape improvements along the North Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan that will improve the pedestrian environment. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 7 • Based upon the above, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Old Bay character district. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 25 dwelling units per acre 27.6 dwelling units per acre X1 (16 units) (18 units) Height 40 feet 39.66 feet X Off-Street 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit 2.1 spaces per dwelling unit X Parkin 27 parking spaces) 38 parking spaces) 1 See above discussions regarding Density and the Public Amenities Incentive Pool for further information. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.B of the Community Development Code (Attached Dwellings): Inconsistent 1. Height: a. The parcel proposed for development is located to the west of Myrtle Avenue, N/A N/A south of Drew Street, and north of Court Street; b. The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved design N/A N/A and appearance; C. The height may be increased to 150 feet if the parcel proposed for development N/A N/A fronts on Clearwater Bay or is only separated from Clearwater Bay by a public open space or right-of-way. 2. All street frontage is designed and used for commercial purposes or is designed so I X that the attached dwellings function in a way which will contribute to an active urban street environment. 3. Off-street parking a. The physical characteristics of the proposed building are such that the likely N/A N/A uses of the property will require fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non-parking demand generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non-automobile modes of transportation; b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing N/A N/A land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14. 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District design guidelines X in Division 5 of Article 3. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 8 • 0 The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and annronriate distances between buildines. Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 9 • 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL ONE AND LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual. acoustic and olfactorv and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of October 25, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findinjzs of Fact: 1. That the 0.652 acre subject property is located along the east side of North Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately 220 feet south of Eldridge Street; 2. That the property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as the property is located within the Old Bay character district; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the area; 2. That the proposed use of two (2) attached dwellings from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Old Bay character district; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-903.13 and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development request to permit 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 10 • 0 Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of a Development Order, the wrought iron security gates must be eliminated and revised plans submitted depicting such; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans shall be revised to depict a six-foot high rear wall for the refuse enclosure; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the proposed swing gates with privacy slats shall be replaced with a material (wood, vinyl, etc.) consistent with the Code and Design Guidelines; 4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, shall be placed underground; 5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall deed or dedicate an easement over all unrestricted water lines, hydrants and backflow prevention devices; 6. That the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from any building and/or entry wall. 7. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 8. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 9. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by December 19, 2007); and 11. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Prepared by Planning Department Staff` l?? Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Future Land Use Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDMFt Harrison Ave N0601 - Clearwater Gardens (D) - 12-19- 06(RT) IFt Harrison Ave N601 - Staff Report 12-19-06.doc Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 11 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefftA myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 9 • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing the technical review and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board - December 19, 2006 FLD2006-06041- Page 12 2- BST O s 0 V/Zf Cr ST Fq i LRMONT ? FA07MONT x z a p. B ? MNNE ? BEOKETT ?? O??ja ?O `? ? 9 y 'M ARSNgI,L BECKETT ST MARSHALL 0 5T I aas T ,) I GMLT°N ZRUSSELL ST 0 ev DMAN ewa„ a Q? TANGO Q a ENGMAN us 1-7 ST SI 0 LA 641LE Sa Q p?M 4 BLUFF a ST Z PALM BLUFF ST PROJECT PAM BLUFF ?? ?3'Rpry JURGENS S N j SITE CEDAR ° ST ° S? METTO 3 f 2° o C J _ o J PALMETTO --E] ? NI CHOLSON ST w NItlIQSON NIC.IOLSON ST L I ?????o?B., F ELDRIDGE ST ur j? ? 1n`®Y ? O ? ? MMILE EIDRIDCE MAPLE ? LEE IF Q A7A 0 < ?I GEORIIGI?A PI 1I ? ? ` HART ST HART JACKSON m ? ? ? JONES ST n '6 2 EU__1 F1 NO = DREW ST S.R. 590 '?a 1?W??? flW cawE sr HENDRGKS Q ? ? ..ME LAURA ? ? ? E] ? 6= NE. a CLEVELAND ST ()OD? ?= W ?Wo ST ST ?1E7w IT ?`EW ? P PIERCE PIERCE ST PIERCE ,5 W[ ?O COURT ST D v? Zn C ? ? + Z ,? COULD ST 8 z Iwu S.R. 60 COURT ?-S4NTq R = S?lrt? O ?? F] 1:1 ? W G BR n .-.LL ST C= O NI CHESTNUT ST S R 60 L .. . COURT ST S ROGERSQa ? ?`? ROGERS ? Location Map Owner. Tezaris & Bieber Acquisitions, LLC. Case: FLD2006-06041 Site: 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.654 Atlas Page: 277B PIN: 09-29-15-60120-000-0010 0 0 Aerial Map Owner. Site: Atlas Page: PIN: Tezaris & Bieber Acquisitions, LLC. Case: FLD2006-06041 0.654 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue 277B 09-29-15-60120-000-0010 Property 0 0 SEMINOLE ST ° 6? 47; a202 Jv 709"' 1 ? ? 8 ? 71 ? ,°0 9 711 a1py05 2 O 707 2 7 ' y0 7 709 10 47 ? ?- CBD 708 ti 7053 , 6 706 70 1 16 CB? ? ' --- - 705 4 3 706 Q 3 704 705 1 _ --? 70 5 704 I , _- 7Q3 1 \ 7/0_4 h 0 12 15 ! I - 301A 702 701 702 O 70 702 BD-- 21 n 1 3 d ?i ?i Fi n 700 700 ' ?0 700 70 m4 $ 611 12 13 610 ss $ ? i 'R h 9 / _611 610 -- ---- 5o a0 61 97 40 111 608 2 609 11 14 6018 609 23 26 0 y 608 ? 47 608 80 3 607 o + 606 j 606 607 22 27 606 39 4 604 6059 16 604 605 21 28 604 605 W90 45 604 5 40 6038 17 602 20 29 602 44 602 6 6091 ------------ 6 CBD 7 18 600 601 19 30 601 t 43 so142 600 51 513 50g 10 g 512 9 512 °o S ----- 51 0 511 11 1 51319 1 510 ---- - 510 ___________.__ 5 2 509 10 8 _ Q 2 508 505 i 18 R 5g7 5509 3 c 6 O 33 506 506 503 1 6 506 pp It 507 17 \JBD 504 Q 505 4 4 1 5 502 505 16 I 504 I 1 500 Z 1 502 500 2; 1 501 2 O 1? 1 6 408 39 1 500 409 11 1 50i GEORGIA- 407 3 II 404 11 1106 1 6 405 13 8 406 407 7 11 406 -------- 11! 4 405 1 8 404 6 _ 11 1 ________________ 11 11 402 405 1 404 -----;?i 9 CBD 404 6 ' 1------ 403 I 5 403 12 9 402 1 40 __- -__-..___.. 9 1 F 402 403 2 402 -? -- i 11 400 1 - -- 10 A ___ _ I 401 I A l l V N _________ ___ j ?___? 8 I g 11 2$ h W) 16 s0 401 11 400 4 11 3 400 1 $ CBD Future Land Use Map Owner. Tezaris & Bieber Acquisitions, LLC. Case: FLD2006-06041 Site: 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.654 Atlas Page: 277B PIN: 09-29-15-60120-000-0010 • • a2AZ SEMINOLE ST ro i , 7091 ,10 8 40 0 9 w 71 / °16 I / 711 Q 0 707 2 7 708 709 10 / 4?A(1 Q' >06 OV y IL 7053 6 r 706 k-f 1 / 18 j 1 3 706 --- - 705 704 yV 705 V 1 ---° ?Q 703 4 _-! 2/04 1 \ 5 704 / / / b 12 % 15 1 - 301A O 701 702 ` 702 70 702 41 'A' _------ / __ __ 7031 / 1 ? 700 700 70 0 4 §1 701 to f? ? RIDG E ST $ ? 1 611 12 13 610 55 °o 1 50 0 40 61 9 611 25 610 61 2 60 809 11 m 608 23 26 60 608 6% 47 60 W 607 3 60 607 16 15 806 807 22 27 606 60 Q 39 46 606 4 604 6059 16 604 605 21 28 604 60 W 60P 45 604 P 5 600 40 6036 17 602 20 29 602 6" -6051 -- 44 602 ----- ------------------ 601 6 7 18 soo 601 -__" 19 -- --- 30 ----- 60142 43600 51 513 10 8 5f2 509 9 512 -------------------- 11 510 511 1 ------_ ---_ W 1 ?1 510 51319 7 ------ --------------.8 509 510 12 2 8 1 510 2 508 --_ -----__- 505 ---- ?, t1 16 5g7 5 508 3 7 W 3 506 5 6 Q 507 17 506 503 5 0 6 Q.i 4 504 585 4 4 502 505 16 504 1 11 500 2 1 2 502 500 2 I 1 501 2 O 1? 1 6 408 39 500 409 11 I 501 14 GEORGIA ST 407 3 1 404 '1D6 1 6 8 406 407 7 11 406 1 4 ------------ 11 405 405 13 404 8 _-------- ------- 405 --_; 1 404 6 11 1 402 403 12 9 402 1 9 6 404 403 ----r--., 5 01 403 ---11 2 402 2 5 _---- 7 19 I F -?° 400 --- - (1 1 - -- 11 10 400 _J 1------ ------------ w1 401 8 1 11 E6 W) j1 Is 3D 11 400 4 11 3 400 1 g HART ST o R saga 314 312 321 2 1 1 1 1 Zoning Map Owner. Tezaris & Bieber Acquisitions, LLC. Case: FLD2006-06041 Site: 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.654 Atlas Page: 277B PIN: 09-29-15-60120-000-0010 11/Z wL SEMINOLE ST '° p z Z? i 42x2 ,? A K 'b 8 b b / t 71 9 70 ro18 b / 8 : _ 71'r 2 707 2 , ' 70910 +% 17 Retail Sa a Q 706 QV _ 70? 8 706 7 , ?; 16 704 V? + 3 - 706 ?Q --_ t 7 / I 3 705 / 4 5 7 tt / 703 _` lin ?' ' _--- 21 301A Attached 702 70 02 O 7 702 "' -g 'a C' 700 $ O 4 700 ? 701 +° rot X14 co ; DRIDGE ST 1 `?+ a 9 4 61112 13 610 611 25 610 60 40 61 `9 m 61 ------- --------- -- -- --- - - tC /1 2 6 60911 1 Sa eftnd3 26 606 &10 sg? 47 6 3 6 6071o 15 606 ec es 22 27 606 ?^! .39 46 606 48 604 15 605 21 28 604 j 60Y Detached 604 6059 - - _ pwellings 6031 17 602 20 29 502 6 609 44602 - - - ------------------ -------- ---------- 6V1 sor so 8 601 78 Y9 43s - to 51 513 8 51 509 9 512 5 1 --------------------- 9 "-°- t 'mot 510 51 -------- 4r 51319 tt 511 _ --_ ------------- ' 510 2 s 510 Q ch@d 506 509 --- W 1? , w inks Soy 7 --- ------- ? ? 5" 5 Sales n a 3d 507 17 etail s 506 4 Attached sos S l Aces 1 4 5 5O2 505 16 5 4 Dwellings 504 1 2 2 Sot 11 5W 2 1 , 501 O 11, 1 408 2 5 1i 501 14 1 500 409 39 1 s GEORGIA ST 407 3 i i 401 Me 1 A? ' 405 406 -----------' 4 404 s 403 llid 406 405 Detail les and g 4 07 ' 11 9 1 4m ---------- --- _ __ __ 4 9 4W 405 6 1 404 -4-0 ------- ae? j,i eS 5 401 ' ---- Mi x --- 1 10 1 1 2 402 --_ 7 _'1 9 j 1 4 00 p, 5 ----- 10-------?A? ec ---1 ,.._----- 401 1 0 11 0 0`51) e. 5 ko, 401 H R 1 j 1 „ aoo A 4 T ST 3 o m 400 *3311 g Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Tezaris & Bieber Acquisitions, LLC. Case: FLD2006-06041 Site: 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Property Size Acres : 0.654 Atlas Page: 277B PIN: 09-29-15-60120-000-0010 9 0 adjacent properties property 0 I F• '14 r !M "RIIIIIII ir .v Looking southwest across North Fort Harrison Avenue toward adjacent properties 601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2006-06041 Looking north along North Fort Harrison Avenue toward adjacent properties Looking south from interior of subject property toward adjacent property adjacent properties Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. Meeting Date: I L U Location: 1 t f+- G y > v A? e- ? Current Use: DV S 0?- C01 WCL5 ? Active Code Enforcement Case (no) yes: n C> ? Address numbeq(yesy?no) (vacant land) ? Landscapin (yes no) ? Overgro (ye `-?(no) ? Debr' (yes (no) ? Inoper'ati a vehicle(s) (yes) o) ? Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) (vacant land) ? Fencing (none (good (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint (good) (fa poor) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes) (no) ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) (no) ? Signage (none) (ok (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) n 0 r? P lC- ? Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ? Outdoor storage (yes),(no) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: I C' eviewed by: i? J Ill j lephone: Revised 03-29-01; 2-04-03 p ode 0 0 Page 1 of 1 09 / 29 / 15 / 00120 / 000 / 0010 30-Jun-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:06:35 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TEZARIS & BIEBER AQUISITIONS LLC OBK: 14943 OPG: 0316 4965 W BREEZE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 601 N F T HARRISON AUE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 261.00 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,006 14,9431 316 950,000 (Q) I 1912: Book 001 Pgs 038- 11/2,004 13,94611,881 400,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/2,003 13,2991 627 250,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 9 /1,998 10,23011,648 220,000 (Q) I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS ,lust/Market: 251,400 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 251,400 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 251,400 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CU Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 5,841.83 1) 172 x 167 6.00 29, 053.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 5,841.83 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 5,841.83 Short Legal NICHOLSON & SLOAN'S ADD LOT i AND BIDWELL'S OAK Description WOOD ADD LOTS 19 & 20 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=09+29+15+60120+000+0010&o=1 6/30/2006 a • Page 1 of 1 09 / 29 / 15 / 00120 / 000 / 0010 :01 30-Jun-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:06:34 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Service Garage Property Address: 601 N FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 345 Land Use: 27 Structural E lement s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fram Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill None Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 0 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Fair Year Built 1,988 Effective Age i5 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,838 7) .00 0 2) Canopy .20 403 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 10080 1.75 101080 17,640 17,640 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 17,640 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-gifl?p=09+29+15+60120+000+0010+01&o=1&t=3 6/30/2006 A, • `.i- - 1?``I I S ? - t 5k, i t LONG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT RFVIEW December 19, 2006 Mr. Frank C. Schlotter 6885 Copperfield Drive New Port Richey, FL 34655 CI'TE' OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT PosT OPPIcI: Box 4748, CUARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICIis BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE MIME, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TI?LEPHONIi (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2006-06041 (601 N. Fort Harrison Avenue) Dear Mr. Schlotter: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On December 19, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development request to permit 18 attached dwellings within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. The CDB APPROVED the application with conditions based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.652 acre subject property is located along the east side of North Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately 220 feet south of Eldridge Street; 2. That the property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That the development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein as the property is located within the Old Bay character district; 4. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; and 5. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal will enhance other redevelopment efforts in the area; 2. That the proposed use of two (2) attached dwellings from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Old Bay character district; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 2-903 of the Community Development Code; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Sections 2-903.13 and 2-903.C of the Community Development Code; and 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level One and Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. FRANK I111MA D, MAYOR JOII,N DolmN, CIIt?NC:n.?u:.?utr;R I IOYr I IANMAON, COI'N'C1INlb:MBlT BILL JONSON, COnNCIIAlF.MBER CARI.FN A. ])I:I srN, Cc>i.NC:n. rnau;rR "GOUni. Ia\9PLOYPIRN I' AND Arri1,,MATIvI•: Ac'I ION 1"IMPLOYER" r Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the wrought iron security gates must be eliminated and revised plans submitted depicting such; 2. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the plans shall be revised to depict a six-foot high rear wall for the refuse enclosure; 3. That prior to the issuance of any building permits, the proposed swing gates with privacy slats shall be replaced with a material (wood, vinyl, etc.) consistent with the Code and Design Guidelines; 4. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all on-site utility facilities, whether they be existing or proposed, shall be placed underground; 5. That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall deed or dedicate an easement over all unrestricted water lines, hydrants and backflow prevention devices; 6. That the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from any building and/or entry wall. 7. That the final design and color of the building must be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 8. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development must be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 9. That any/all future signage must meet the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That the first building permit must be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by December 19, 2007); and 11. That the final Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of a Flexible Development approval (by December 19, 2007). All required Certificates of Occupancy must be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity of the Development Order. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefftaa,mvclearwater.com. Sincerely, _ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationslFt Harrison Ave N0601 -Clearwater Gardens (D) - ApprovedlFt Harrison Ave N 601 - Development Order 12-19-06.doc CL6/\9Wt\T69 &l\9D6N$ G601 N. FORT HARRISON AVE. C LEARWATER, FLORIDA Location Map r 4 .f 1 ` rr r F CLEAMATM FLOWA C" O p y IOII WT.& Project Data Owner: TEZARIS & BEIBER AQUISITIONS, LLC 4965 W. BREEZE CIRCLE PALM HARBER, FLORIDA 34683 CONTACT: MARK N. TEZARIS, OWNER PHONE: (347) 683.6715 FAX: (718) 408-3276 Engineer: SCHLOTTER & ASSOCIATES P.O.BOX 3256 HOLIDAY, FLORIDA 34692-0256 PHONE: (727) 372.9256 FAX: (727) 372.4586 Surveyor: TARGET LAND SURVEYING, INC. P.O. BOX 663 DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34697-0663 CONTACT: PHILIP C. STOCK PHONE: (727) 784-0573 Contact Person: SCHLOTTER & ASSOCIATES, INC. FRANK C. SCHLOTTER, P.E. W? p? 3ct CL b CL ° WWWcc CA a ?Qa? W cc W W co ` /D UJI N DUin8 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 92006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Drawing Index T1 TITLE SHEET CIVIL C1.1 EX STING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN I C1.2 EX ST NG CONDTDNS & DEMOLTION PLAN DETAILS C2.1 SITE PLAN C2.2 SITE NOTES C2.3 SITE DETAILS & NOTES C2.4 SITE DETAILS C2.5 SITE DETAILS C2.6 SITE DETAILS C3.1 PAVING, GRADING, DRAINAGE PLAN C3.2 PAVING, GRAD NG, DRAINAGE SECTION & NOTES C3.3 PAVNG, GRADNG, DRANAGE DETAILS I C3.4 PAVING GRADING, DRAINAGE DETAILS C4.1 UTILITY PLAN C4.2 UTILITY DETAILS C4,3 UTILTY DETAILS & NOTES C4.4 UTILITY DETALS & NOTES C4.5 UTILITY DETAILS ARCHITECTURAL A1.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A1.2 SECOND & THIRD FLOOR PLAN A1.3 ROOF PLAN A2.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS A22 BU LDNG ELEVATIONS NG ELEVATIONS A2.3 PART AL BUILD I A2.4 PART AL BUILDNG ELEVATONS I A2.5 GARAGE SECTION 0 Z ?cnzQ lco mi ?dD ?ZiIi ?'?w- ?ZZW pLO ow 01 m LU C N z D Z N v Q N (n U N W N V 1 m a ? IL 0 m inS Lu W D Z 4 Z Q J ao U U)In (n Wa Wm Zx D Em z6 Wd 0 NO DAIS 3 9/5/06 Z S l a Z ., N? i r z / „t+ Is 41 ?.(?• L?< 0: ?5 C J VSR I V V , Fft Fl % r° °tlQ 30JUN06 =Tl A of eN 1' ri Soy 3b ? , h ? ? Z 74' o A b • Ao/9y ,Qy 9 9 14' / 1.0 SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST 'p, IV IV PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ,88°35'59"E, 158,19'(M) 159;1'( 8' / O o FND 4 V ( a OAK 13' DAK D' OAK 32 8 RO' y DA I"- 6 CLFI I 14' PALM Il' PALM W1.1. 9' PALM 1 q V y1 J? Q J QW ? O Q e by be 11. 2Z 5'(R) )q 8. A0? a a O 2,0'(R) j F_ Of 0 T z c D 1 !P O q) 8' PALM I 6 10 6' WOOD FENCE 3i °v ° n CDNC ,a u Ng DUMPS TER IGHT u PAD a ?pOL E n / 10 - ---- -S CO 20 / (P,B.1, PG.46) / , ASP PVMT. DRIVE 4sB STORM \ --GRATE A?bO 1A 1.... 30.6 7' 9q y ?-/ 1 cr - _ I, f METAL POST j•: (TYPICAL) yl 42' OAK ' 1620 (R) W I I0 LIGHT ti Ia L G T - I MASONRY WALL 0 q2 .I - AND COLUMNS (TYPICAL) I a3°A 9 / _I - VACUUM u \ STATION SIDEWALK E S ENT ACITY OF I o[r-- CLEARWAT (. 7 Ol, P?S130-132) =======Q ° I CDNC -- A a . ?5.-. 3 ME AL POST .I I ' 45' OAK j I CDVERED CDNC LET 19 (TYPICAL) ?a TEMPORARY I CARWASH BAYS (P,B,1, PGr46) CONSTRUCTION EA ENT q TO CITY OF CLEARW ERI Ip ' (0,R.7501, PGS,130-132) r----- _==? ° ?. 9 Nb x,21 A" J ASP PVMT. DRIVE 2 I a v, 5 3 O IGN I e I PLAT BOUNDARY uAcuuM m, .ISTATION 175'(R) O °z? -- _ ==z7 0 CDNC LIGHT &0 R) I POLE lC I b 5 3 ??e _fyy A'?zi D 0 L a DISK DETENTION POND, I y1 I ' 6 12 f 70.3' VACUUM l -- --------- - - a - STATIO HB AT APPROXIMATE + 30a' 5 - Gas o cOMC CD 314' TOP DF BANK METER a C a LOT 1 3 I I'7 I ELECTRI I (P.B,1, P6.38) . LIGHT ?I / 2 I DNE METERS SANITARYI POL Im. I MITERED 9 STr7RY M.HI 13` AL . END SECTI - -?3 ASP PVMT, DRI aALri v, e / ,0 o MASQNRY 6.0' I+, I ADJ UY ANCHNI d AD. car a ADJACE 2' PALM A2Zb nna'' :V K F [UTILITY L BOX F_ 6'C-E:p LJN 1.2' FND 2' IP (NO #) 4 r 110 LG N (P, 12' PALM 'A FLOW R NTION L16HT CARWASN iI - ?ZOA. 10 POLE A0 E 1 #601 5 3 ;i I P? BDDTH -. I lO 3, 11 o 1 _ 4TER METER 8' "? 36 0' 0z - -- F? 6- - O - -- - STORM , L- J I 9 OVERHANG ?) - GRATE ;?y 5 • 3 , 92.7830.64^ 777777 '??? 1 9 6'CLF ON 1.6' 110 l ??? b A ?y 7'YF' 'i o . b . J - - - - - y Za A?' - - {V: . 11' PALM - - - P PALM ------i-----._ -.?? FND'X'CUT 01451 W, 175,24'(P ;l 518' 1R D '1B 3906) Ay n yyA Ae If' 0A1 M D Existing Conditions And Demolition Plan SCALE: 1" = 20' I 'R 11' PALM C`JNC . ' H (NO H) .N.e''A - Ab 16' OAK eQti JACENT ASP PVMT, DRIVE 10 0 10 20 30 FT Ill= KEY NOTES (D CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE PER DETAIL ON THIS SHEET. 02 CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT SHOWN DASHED. O CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL EXISTING CONCRETE SLABS ON SITE. O CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE, AFTER NEW CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. O CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL BUILDINGS, CARWASH BOOTH, VACUUM STATIONS AND STRUCTURES ON SITE. 6o CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH WOOD FENCE. SOME WOOD FENCE MAY REMAIN UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AT GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S OPTION. (D CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING SIGN. 8O POWER POLES & POWER LINES SHALL BE RELOCATED BY POWER COMPANY, AND COORDINATED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. go REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, STORM GRATES, END SECTION, AND ALL STORM SYSTEM ITEMS. 10 REMOVE LIGHT POLE AND ASSOCIATED POWER AND CONDUIT. 11 EXISTING WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTER TO REMAIN. 12 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN - EXISTING SITE DATA EXISTING LAND USE: BUSINESS-CAR WASH PARCEL I.D. #: 09-29-15-60120-000-0010 FLOOD ZONE: FLOOD ZONE X AS DEPICTED ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL #12103CO106H. DATED: 5-17-05 EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE AREAS: (TOTAL SITE = 28,485 S.F. = 0.654 ACRES) TOTAL SITE AREA 28,485 SF/ 0.654 AC/100.0 EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: BUILDING: 3,233 S.F./ 0.074 AC/ 11.37?„- PAVEMENT: 15,642 S.F./ 0.359 AC/ 54.V. TOTAL: 18,875 SF/ 0.433 AC/ 66.f k; EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA: ' : U) . GREEN AREA: 9,610 SF/ 0.221 AC/ 3311% . MUe(? ORIGINAL RECEIVED h 09 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1z ?V"ZQ ?oo ?=Mo Z <4 I HODa 3ooj v mD J v V) N Lu N iN U Qro O C1 N W m it IL .Q Lu M o W , z 4 zQ O J d0 Z ; I U ?m (n w a WN ZX 0 ?m Wd ND DATE t 99',8i',OS, 2 10/12/06 a 4. 4 ??uf 1pl44 ., zc? ` e?o1 U. d 4 r i 1 ?ti er ,e 41, . ! J FCS 06109 30JUN06 SXFE NO, C1.1 pr yr r :r y ERROSION CONTROL TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL: ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (SILT BARRIERS) AND TREE BARRICADES MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. ENCROACHMENT OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN THESE BARRICADES COULD RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE CITATIONS AND/OR PERMIT REVOCATION BY APPLICABLE PERMITTING AGENCIES. SILTATION BARRIERS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND REPAIRED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. HAY BALES SHALL BE INSTALLED ONCE PERIMETER GRADING IS COMPLETED. STORMWATER FACILITIES SHALL HAVE HAY BALES PLACED AROUND THEIR ENTRANCES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRANSPORTED INTO THE STORMWATER SYSTEM. HAY BALES SHALL BE PLACED ALONG THE PERIMETER OF ALL DOWNSTREAM BOUNDARIES TO PROVIDE FILTRATION OF RUNOFF DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE HAY BALES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE ENGINEER HAS APPROVED THE VEGETATIVE COVER ALONG EMBANKMENTS PROVIDING RUNOFF TO THE PERIMETER. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN SOIL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. IF AT ANY TIME DRAINAGE STRUCTURES OR EROSION CONTROL DEVICES BECOME DAMAGED OR INOPERABLE, IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR THEM. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED, AT THE END OF EACH DAY, TO HAVE THE SITE GRADED IN SUCH A WAY THAT ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE NOT ADVERSELY IMPACTED BY EROSION OR SEDIMENT LEAVING THE SITE. CLEARED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED EARLY IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS AND IF NATURAL PRECIPITATION DOES NOT PROVIDE PERIODIC WETTING OF THE SITE, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A METHOD OF SPRAYING THE SITE TO PREVENT WIND EROSION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR ONLY THAT AREA SHOWN TO BE CLEARED ON THE PLAN. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO DISTURB THE EXISTING VEGETATION IN ONLY THOSE AREAS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT THAT TIME. ALL CLEAR SITE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF ANY SIGNAGE, PLANTINGS, TREES, ETC. IN EXCESS OF THREE- AND- A-H ALF (3-1/2) FEET IN HEIGHT. DURING LAND ALTERATION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL TO REMOVE VEGETATION BY GRUBBING OR TO PLACE SOIL DEPOSITS, DEBRIS, SOLVENTS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL, MACHINERY OR OTHER EQUIPMENT OF ANY KIND WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF A TREE TO REMAIN ON THE SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ALL TREE ROOTS EXISTING WITHIN APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AREAS AND ORIGINATING FROM A PROTECTED TREE SHALL BE SEVERED CLEAN AT THE LIMITS OF THE PRESERVED AREA. ALL TRIMMING UNDERTAKEN ON A TREE PROTECTED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SHALL BE PRUNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION (NAA) PRUNING STANDARDS. L_ wLLlvv LEGEND, BM - Benchmark CB - Concrete Block CL - Centerline CM - Concrete Monument ELEV - Elevation FND - Found IP - Iron Pipe IR - Iron Rod ASP - Asphalt LS# - Land Surveyor Registration Number NIT - Nail & Tab N&D - Nail & Disk M.H. - Manhole P.R.M. - Permanent Reference Monument R/W - Right OF Way CONC - Concrete P.C. - Point OF Curvature P.T. - Point or Tangent P.R,C, - Point OF Reverse Curvature P.CC, - Point OF Compound Curve Ch. - Chord P.P. - Power Pole W.M. - Water Meter R,R,S - Railroad Spike RAD, - Radius R - Record D - Deed M - Measured C - Calculated D.B. - Deed Book P.B. - Plat Book O.R. - DFFldal Record Book PG - Page PVMT - Pavement P.D.B. Point OF Bearing P.O.C, Point OF Commencement CHB, Chord Bearin R,P, - Radius Point CLF - Chain Link Fence P.C.P. - Permanent ControlgPoint P,L - Point of Intersection LINE LEGEND: CENTERLIN?_ ORIGINAL BOUNDARY LINES 1?D BUILDING LINE -? PLAT L0T LINES EASEMENT _LINE ?_ 2006 POWER LPNE-) WOOD FENCE . APARTMENT CHAIN LINK FENCE-a WiRE FENCES ARWATER WATER FL00D ZONE LINE-I B_WLDING TIE(DIMENSION a NEW SILTrE--- ? 0 SILT FENCE DETAIL 6.0' max. 20* POST N FILTER FABRIC POST SILT FLOW ro 1. FILTER FABRIC TO CONFORM WITH F.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS (SEC. 985) 2. POSTS TO BE 2"x4" WOOD POST OR 1,3 LB/FT STEEL POST. 3. POST POSITION TO BE CANTED (20') OR VERTICAL (90'). 4. DO NOT DEPLOY IN A MANNER THAT SILT FENCE WILL ACT AS A DAM ACROSS PERMANENT FLOWING WATERCOURSES. 5. SILT FENCE WILL NOT BE TRENCHED ANY WHERE ADJACENT TO TREES 6. THE SILT FENCE MUST BE SECURED THROUGH THE PLACEMENT OF FILL OVER THE LOWER LIP OF THE BARRICADE t'1HT d/iLC D/-%M (ICR UC 1 MIL (2) 2"X2" STAKES OR REPAR 2' IN GROUND BINDING WIRE OR NYLON STAKED AND ENTRENCHED (4") STRAW BALE COMPACTED SOIL TO PREVENT PIPING - SEDIMENT LADEN RUNOFF a FDOT INDEX 102 nreenl IT1r%K1 AI/1TCC° -LlGIVIIJLI 1 1\JI14 IYV I LV 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, SIDEWALKS, SEWER AND WATER LINES, IRRIGATION SYSTEM, SIGNS, ETC. WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. 2. ALL DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND REFUSE MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES AND STATE RULES. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FROM LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES PRIOR TO PERFORMING DEMOLITION/ DISPOSAL WORK. 4. CONTRACTOR TO RECEIVE OWNERS PERMISSION TO TRIM AND REMOVE ANY OFF-SITE TREES THAT HANG OVER THE PROPERTY LINE. 5. PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF ANY UTILITIES IN THE PROJECT SITE (I.E. GAS, WATER, SEWER, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT APPROPRIATE UTILITY AGENCY. 6. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AS NECESSARY FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, COORDINATE DEMOLTiON, AND RELOCATION OF UTILITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. HAND DIG AS NECESSARY, SO AS NOT TO DAMAGE EXISTING UTILITY SYSTEMS, THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN USE. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TREE PROTECTIVE BARRICADES ON TREES TO REMAIN, PER LANDSCAPE DRAWING DETAILS 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING TREES, PER LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS 9. EXCAVATE GRADE AS NECESSARY FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, NEW FLOOR SLAB AND FOOTINGS, AND FOR NEW RETENTION AREA, ETC. 10. DEMOLISH EXISTING STORM SYSTEM, STORM GRATES, END SECTION, MANHOLES, PIPES, ETC. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL BOLLARDS 12. LOCATE UNDERGROUND OIL/WATER SEPARATOR, AND REMOVE PER CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS. 13. TREE BARRICADES AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. LEGAL DESCRIPTION This property lies within Flood Zone X as depicted on Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel # 12103CO106H Dated., 5-17-05 BENCHMARK, P.C.D. AURAL 'F' MAP #132 ELEV=22,41'(NAVD) BASE FLOOD ELEVATION. N/A SECTION__2__TOWNSHIPja-95 RANGE_j5F_ BASIS OF BEARINGS, THE E'LY R/W LINE OF FT HARRISON AVE., N,13'19'16E(M) BOUNDARY SURVEY., LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1, LOT 1, NICHOLSON & SLOAN'S SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT f t THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 38, PUBLIC RECORDS OF tf°° PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, PARCEL 11, .?V . LOTS 19 AND 20, G.L. BIDWELLS OAKWOOD ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLA, w ; ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 4 (? OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, Iii SURVEY NOTES ? 7e GENERAL NOTES: ?r. i. No instruments of record reflecting easements, rights-of-way, and/or ownership were furnished, except as shown. 2. No foundations or underground improvements located except as shown. 3. If elevations are shown, such elevations ore based on N.G.V.D. 1929 (MSL = 0.00), Except Pinellas County Where elevations are based on N.A.V.D. 1988 (MSL = 0.00'. 4. Declaration is made to original purchaser of the survey. It is not transferable to additional institutions or subsequent owners. 5. Surveyor has made no investigation or independent search for easements of record, encumbrances, restrictive covenants, ownership title evidence, or any other facts that on accurate and current title search may disclose. 6. No water meters located except as shown. 7. This Survey is prepared for the exclusive use of those parties certified herein and is valid for one (1) year from Date of Certification. PARCEL C17NSISTS OF 28,485,12 SQ, FT, OR 0,65 ACRES. Z U) Oz< yon Mi ?d0 %5Z Q4 Q UJ C W a a LMOo; 3:z z< OoJ J v ?n LU ro Q t7 ro Qr Zm O ?n Ln W ro 0 Q (? 1. IL a m .Q to LU IC o W Z 4 ZQ J 0 Q J ao M V Wn Wm ZX 0 Wd NO DATA a 4 .101 . ON . • , om o _n+' i o, s? 9 V `on . w d I_........ VSR FCS roe. 06109 0.1E 30JUN06 s?att xo. C12 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW CONCRETE AND PAVER FINISH SIDE WALK W/ HDCP ACCESSIBL RAMP 0 DRIVEWAY PER FDOT r INDEX No. 304 AND W/ 2' CLE R ZONE 0 %4" PER FT MAX. SL E. BRICK PAVER SIDEWALK WILL -E SUBJECT TO SEPARATE RIGHr OF-WAY PERMIT 0 ? r e? O ,W (? e r ?e 0 ?e J 2 /`O I W2o' I 1 n41. I 24 I PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLYII SITTING AREA PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY SITTING AREA J z ix u SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA NII I I I I I I I I I I n N V?148 R&59' 12 `70• 13 v 21 TYP. 31 FETENTION Pow 12 y3, N 13 N, 88 °35 9'E 158,19'(M) 159,1"(R) ,67' I 30 6 15 ae7' 4q i. 7 m CLUB HOUSE (2 STIOFEB) b r FOOTPRNT - 450 90. FT. Tn 25r0'_ I r./o I ? I 15 13 71717fSQo III l111 11 11 111 11 19'j } 1 CONDOMNW BLDG (4 STORES) 19 11 II u u II II 11 II 111 2 I lo,? o? m /-FOOTPRINT -1,858 SO. FT. i?A??>E EW ?a. 4.34 ® 14 \ 15 33 14 Pool- 47 ---Old / 45' 45' CONDOIyM_ MI BLDQ 4 STORES FOOTPF1 W - 4,138 80. F7. M 0 I 14 I i 3 i b^ ti (D 9 ? B I O 0 9 '2 ? 18.00' I 1200' ORIGINAL RECEIVED t,OV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPAPTI nJ 1 2 STACK 7YP RAGGEyRkGF.)'I r A 20' O 110x20' TYP. GARAGE) 20 i 4.34 a 4.34 O 20' 0.1 ® 26 2 2 STACK \ I p OAHAflE N e rJ 2 STACK 1 (10'x20 TYP GARAGE) ?0 4.34' 0 o° GARAGE m ( x20 TYP GARAGE) m a 4.34 d. 11a I , 2 0 500 20 I (? 13 I :-, 0' ,88°00'45'W,_ 175.E V ? V o! 0 z Site Plan SCALE: 1" = 20' 10 5 0 10 2,0 30 FT xm, ? 12' I L ti co .., 4 10 1,00' 1..00' 101 SITE KEY NOTES - 1C NEW HANDICAP SPACE WITH H.C. PARKING SIGN PER DETAIL SHEET C2.5. 0 NEW TRELLIS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 0 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER DETAIL 1/C3.4. 0 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW 15'-0" CMU DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE W/ DOUBLE WOOD GATES PER DETAIL ON C2.4. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW 4" THICK 50 CONCRETE SIDE WALK PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2.3. OPTION - BRICK PAVER FINISH. 0 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW 6" VERTICAL CONCRETE CURB PER DETAIL ON SHEET 2.3. 0 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. OB CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW CONCRETE TYPE C' WHEEL STOP PER DETAIL ON SH. 2.5. O SLOPE SIDEWALK MAX. 1:12 SLOPE. PROVIDE TEXTURE AS REQUIRED BY CURRENT CODE REQUIREMENTS. 10 2 LEVEL HYDRAULIC STACKED PARKING SPACES 11 INSTALL 24" WHITE PAINTED STOP BAR AND 30' STOP SIGN 12 CMU RETAINING WALL FOR RETENTION POND. SEE DETAIL 4/C3.4. 13 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW 6' HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCE W/ STUCCO FINISH PILASTER COLUMNS. 4 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW 4' HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCE W/ STUCCO FINISH PILASTER COLUMNS. 15 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL BRICK PAVERS IN LOCATION SHOWN ON PLANS. 16 ALL CLEAR-SITE AREA (20' FROM PROPERTY LINE AND 20' FROM EDGE OF SITE DRIVE PAVEMENT) SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF ANY SIGNAGE. PLANTINGS, TREES, ETC. IN EXCESS OF TWO-AND-A-HALF (2-1/2') FT IN HEIGHT. 17 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 6 FT WROUGHT IRON FENCE AND PILASTER COLUMNS. CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB BETWEEN PILASTER COLUMNS 18 REPLACE EXISTING SIDEWALK WITH NEW SIDEWALK WITH BRICK PAVER FINISH. COORDINATE TYPE OF PAVER, COLOR OF PAVER AND PATTERN WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER OVERALL STREET SCAPE PLAN. 19 CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL WROUGHT IRON GATE. 4 FT WIDE X 4 FT. HIGH 20 INSTALL PAIR OF 12 FT WIDE WROUGHT IRON GATES WITH AUTOMATIC CARD CONTROLS 21 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 6' HIGH 0211 0 WROUGHT IRON FENCE ABOVE CONC. RETENTION WALL 22 INSTALL BENCH PER CPLJQZ CLEARWATER 23 5 FT. WIDE CROSSWALK, HERRINGBONE B v AVERS . 24 12" X 12 CONCRETE PAVER FIELD W/.`1 ".' CONCRETE PAVER EDGE BANDING ON 8@ SIDES OF SIDEWALK f 25 BENCH, MATCH CITY OF CLEARWATER REQ. U P 26 INSTALL FOUNTAIN ?, - a 27 5 FT WIDE CROSSWALK, W/ CLEARWATER PAVER FEILD AND COLOR, W/ 12" CONCRETE BANDING EACH SIDE. 0 4" TH. CONCRETE 2g HERRING BONE PAVERS 30 EDGE OF SLOPE TO RETENTION POND 31 PALM TREES, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN 1321 8 FT. g4ll,04L W/ STUCCO FINISH z u3Roa G Iz t?lzVLL rf?.?OQ . 3ZZa ao;w d\1ou LLI N Q L7 x Q? V F? O V Ln N W o 13 vm Q O L e IL e Q ao W w9 Z 4 2 Q O ?a -I a o V ?n W N W N Zx 13 m ® W d FIEVISIM NO, DATE t WMAS 2 10/12/06 S 11/2/06 4 •;Y O I 1 W 0.p r° • r ? w r ° U t., ?= 0 M Za'0>7 v ? s F . J; . 08: 06109 o?rL 30JUN06 sxm xo. C2.1 PROJECT DATA PROJECT NAME: CLEARWATER GARDENS CONDOMINIUMS OWNER: TEZARIS & BEIBER AQUISITIONS, LLC 4965 W. BREEZE CIRCLE PALM HARBER, FLORIDA 34683 CONTACT: MARK N. TEZARIS, OWNER PHONE: (347) 683-6715 FAX: (718) 408-3276 ENGINEER: SCHLOTTER & ASSOCIATES P.O.BOX 3256 HOLIDAY, FLORIDA 34692-0256 PHONE: (727) 372-9256 FAX: (727) 372-4586 SURVEYOR: TARGET LAND SURVEYING, INC. P.O. BOX 663 DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34697-0663 CONTACT: PHILIP C. STOCK PHONE: (727) 784-0573 CONTACT PERSONS: SCHLOTTER & ASSOCIATES, INC. FRANK C. SCHLOTTER, P.E. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED SIGNS MUST BE APPLIED FOR, APPROVED, AND PERMITTED ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS APART FROM ANY ULTIMATELY APPROVED SITE PLAN. APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF ANY SIGN. 2. HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND STRIPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTE 316, THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, OR OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS. 3. ALL ON-SITE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE STRIPED AND SIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, LATEST EDITION. PARKING SPACES, DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, AND STOP BARS SHALL BE STRIPED IN WHITE. IT SHALL BE THE OWNER/DEVELOPER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROPERLY SIGN AND STRIPE THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS. 4. A CITY OF CLEARWATER RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY. 5. ALL CLEAR-SITE AREAS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF ANY SIGNAGE, PLANTINGS, TREES, ETC. IN EXCESS OF THREE-AND-A-HALF (3-1/2) FEET IN HEIGHT. 6. NO IRRIGATION SYSTEM OR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ANY CITY OR STATE RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT. 7. FUGITIVE DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING AS NECESSARY 8. NO ON-SITE BURNING WILL BE CONDUCTED WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING APPROPRIATE PERMITS. 9. TESTING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT TESTING SPECS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, STORM DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES. 10. ALL UTILITY MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP MUST COMPLY WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER STANDARDS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF WATER, WASTEWATER AND RECLAIMED WATER FACILITIES. 11. THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER CERTIFIES THAT THE SITE HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. 12. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, A BUILDING PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR ALL STRUCTURES THAT HAVE A FOOTER, REGARDLESS OF SIZE, THROUGH CITY OF CLEARWATER CENTRAL PERMITTING (i.e. INCLUDING BUT NOT INCLUSIVE BUILDING, ACCESSORIES AND RETAINING WALLS). 13. DURING CONSTRUCTION IF SOMETHING IS UNCOVERED, PARTICULARLY OF AN ARCHEOLOGICAL NATURE, THAT ALL WORK SHALL STOP AND THAT THE STATE AECHEOLOGICAL OFFICE AND THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ARE NOTIFIED. 14. IT IS THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSPECT AND MAINTAIN THE WATER RETENTION SYSTEM ON A REGULAR BASIS. 15. ALL SODDED SLOPES, OVER 4 TO 1, SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH SOD PEGS. 16. ALL DEMOLITION DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF. 17. ALL ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES SHALL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER-DEVELOPER. 18. THE OWNER/DEVELOPER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE SITE AND ITS SUBSEQUENT BUILDING PERMITS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REZONING/MPUD/PUD CONDITIONS. C%ITr MATA VI I L L r,%1/'1 EXISTING LAND USE: BUSINESS-CAR WASH BUILDING SETBACKS: PROPOSED USE: 25 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE 00' FRONT YARD - 12' PROVIDED ZONING: SITE: OLD BAY DISTRICT DOWNTOWN ZONING 00' SIDE YARD - 8'-8' & l'-0" PROVIDED 00' REAR YARD - 50' PROVIDED NORTH: OLD BAY DISTRICT DOWNTOWN ZONING (BOAT REPAIR AND STORAGE) REQUIRED PARKING: SOUTH: OLD BAY DISTRICT DOWNTOWN ZONING 2 SPACES PER DWELLING UNIT (EXISTING APARTMENT BUILDING) PLUS 2 H.C. (5%) SPACES WEST: NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE EAST: OLD BAY DISTRICT DOWNTOWN ZONING REGULAR PARKING SPACES: = 36 SPACES PARCEL I.D. #: 09-29-15-60120-000-0010 (PARKING IS HYDRAULIC 2 LEVEL LIFT PARKING) FLOOD ZONE: FLOOD ZONE X AS DEPICTED ON FLOOD INSURANCE HANDICAP PARKING SPACES: = 2 SPACES RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL #12103CO106H. DATED: 5-17-05 TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: = 38 SPACES BUILDING HEIGHT: 4 STORIES 40'-0" MAX. UTILITY COMPANIES: OCCUPANCY: RESIDENTIAL WATER: PINELLAS COUNTY UTILITIES NO. OF PROPOSED DWELLING UNITS = 18 CONDOMINIUMS IRRIGATION: RECLAIMED WATER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION: TYPE IIB; UNPROTECTED; SPRINKLERED SEWER: UTILITIES, INC. (FBC, 2004 ED.) ELECTRIC: PROGRESS ENERGY TEL HONE: VERIZON SITE AREAS: (TOTAL SITE = 28,485 S.F. = 0.654 ACRES) PR AREA 28,4 SF 0.654 AC 00 % XISIING CON01 ONS TE AREAS: - BLDG F OTPRINTS 559 S 0.1 1 C 23.0 % (TOTAL SITE = 28,485 S.F. = 0.654 ACRES) - PAVING, PARKING, DUMPSTER 11,911 SF 0.273 AC 41.8 % TOTAL SITE AREA 28,485 SF/ 0.654 AC/ 100.0 % ' - RETENTION POND 1,929 SF 0.044 AC 6.8 % GREEN AREA 3,445 SF 0.079 AC 12.1 % EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: - SIDEWALKS, CURBS, POOL 4,641 SF 0.107 AC 16.3 % BUILDING/CAR WASH: 3,233 S.F./ 0.074 AC/ 11.3% POOL DECK, BALCONIES, STAIRS PAVEMENT/CONCRETE: 15,642 S.F./ 0.359 AC/ 54.9% TOTAL: 18,875 SF/ 0.433 AC/ 66.2% IMPERVIOUS AREA 23,111 SF 0.123 AC 18.8 % - PERVIOUS AREA 5 374 SF 0.531 AC 81 2 % EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA: , . GREEN AREA: 9,610 SF/ 0.221 AC/.33.8 _ % -CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE FDOT "ROADWAY PLANS PREPARATION MANUAL" (I.E. PPM). 2. ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY INSTALLATIONS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRACTICES IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA UTILITIES ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL. 3. SIGN AND BARRICADES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S "MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES" AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S "ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS" INDEXES 600 THROUGH 665 (LATEST EDITIONS), 4. SAFE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC IS TO BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 5. SAW CUT EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE NEW DRIVEWAY. 6. DISTURBED AREA WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AND SODDED. 7. DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING UNDERDRAIN OR STORM SYSTEMS. IF FILTRATION BED IS DISTURBED, CONTACT THE AREA INSPECTOR WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR ASSISTANCE. `*J > 8. TYPE OF SOD USED TO RESTORE OWNER-MAINTAINED AREA IN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH Z. OWNER. U 9, NO STOCKPILING OF MATERIAL IN ROADWAY OR ON SIDEWALK; ALL DIRT AND DEBRIS WILL BE REMOVED FROM, . , t JOB SITE DAILY. ROADS AND SIDEWALK TO BE SWEPT DAILY AS PART OF DAILY CLEAN-UP. ? •• i' 0 z ?cAzQ 100 2e =ma Q 4 Z< I' a zz< p3L0;w ?mW J W W ?n N W m Q L7 n _ Qe z V an O? V m w 0 Q ?m LZ IL a cr- M Q 61 0 Lu W Z4 zQ O j 0 J ao = MI m V) ° I W ro W e Zx ®Wd da,,+'II..'' i )ce i it 3_\10. NO STREET SHALL BE CLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER TRAFFIC DIVISION. AT LEAST 48 HOURS ADVANCED COORDINATION IS REQUIRED. `'•,?y2 11. ANY PORTION OF THE ROADWAY THAT SUSTAINS EXCESSIVE CONSTRUCTION RELATED DAMAGE, IN THE OPINION OF CITY OF CLEARWTER HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR EXPENSE IN A MANNER SPECIFIED BY CITY OF CLEARWATER HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. 12. NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS REGARDING SPRINKLER SYSTEM, PLANTS AND MAIL BOXES THAT WILL BE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. 13. CONTACT CITY OF CLEARWATER, HIGHWAY INSPECTOR 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TRAFFIC PER F.D.O.T. STANDARD INDEX No. 603 WHEN CONNEC71NG THE DRIVEWAY TO NORTH FORT HARRISON AVE. "I'l giua°5t%'7ece VSR CHECKED, FCS 06109 wre 30JUN06 C22 PROJECT NOTES & SPECS. 1. THE LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND 2. ALL WORK SHALL BE LEFT IN SUCH A MANNER THAT IT IS SAFE TO THE PUBLIC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. SIGNS AND BARRICADES TO BE ACCORDING TO F.D.O.T. MANUAL OF SAFE PRACTICES; REFERENCE F.D.O.T. INDEXES 600 THROUGH 650 AND 17349 PER ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS LATEST EDITION OF D.C. INDEXES 100 THROUGH 116. THERE WILL BE NO ON-SITE BURNING. 3. ADDITIONAL CONTROL AND SCOPE OF WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH AS-BUILT DRAWINGS AND SURVEYS UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. 4. A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR SHALL DO ALL BUILDING LAYOUT, CURB & ROADWAY, AND GRADE STAKING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN THE FIELD AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER'S OFFICE IMMEDIATELY ON ANY CONFLICTS ARISING DURING CONSTRUCTION OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONSULT WITH THE ENGINEER FOR MAKING ANY AND ALL REQUIRED INTERPRETATIONS OF THE PLANS; HOWEVER, THIS IN NO WAY RELIEVES THE CONTRACTOR OF HIS RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTING THE PROJECT TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE PLANS. ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929. MEAN SEA LEVEL = 0.00. 5. PERMITS: NO CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPROVED. A RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND NO IRRIGATION SYSTEM OR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ANY PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHOUT ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE PERMIT. ALL PROPOSED SIGNS MUST BE APPLIED FOR, APPROVED AND PERMITTED ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS APART FROM ANY ULTIMATELY APPROVED SITE PLAN; APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF ANY SIGN. 6. STRIPING: HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES WILL BE PROPERLY SIGNED AND STRIPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTE 316, THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, OR OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS. ALL ON-SITE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE STRIPED AND SIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, LATEST EDITION. PARKING SPACES, DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, AND STOP BARS SHALL BE STRIPED IN WHITE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROPERLY SIGN AND STRIPE THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITY ENTRANCES WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF ENTRANCES, EXITS, RAMPS, DOWNSPOUTS, ETC. PRIOR TO STARTING SITE WORK. 01MCIA/Ai V nC:rAii 1/2" PROFILE z ...... ...................I J 0 LLJ I'l 0 PLAN JOINTS N 2-#4 CONT.-V Wz w¢ VI J a TURN-DOWN WALK 1. CONCRETE SIDEWALK: 4" THICK SLAB ON-SITE AND 6" THICK SLAB OFF-SITE WITH 6x6 #10/10 W.W.M. PLACED 2" ABOVE THE BOTTOM OF THE SLAB. 2. ROUGH BROOM FINISH. 3. 5" WIDE SMOOTH TROWEL FINISH ALONG SIDEWALK EDGE AND JOINTS, 4. CONTRACTION JOINT: 1/8" WIDE x 1" DEEP, SPACED 5' O.C. 5. CONSTRUCTION JOINT: USE PRE-MOLDED FILLER AT BUILDING AND UTILITIES. 6. TURN-DOWN WALK: TERMINATE SIDEWALK ALONG CONCRETE PAVING WITH A THICKENED FOOTING AS SHOWN. BOLLARD DETAIL 0 i N 0 i ORIGINAL RECEIVED k!OV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATErs 6" DIA. STEEL POST FILLED W/CONCRETE CENTER GUARD POST ON 12" WIDE CONC. CURB ® DRIVE THRU LANE FINISH SURFACE 18" DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING x C>' { • j c { ? ?' • tJ 0 Z Woz< ?OD m0 g-IrD D ZIr4 $ Q I?Hw w ?ODa 3ZZa ow 4?'SD J Lo m trf uj it N ZN V <? O? (?//1? n in V I W o 13 m ILs C N +Q ND Lu W O 4 ZQ J ? Oa -? a o .I V n' (n w N W N Zx ® Wd FEVOM Na DATE t 9/5/06 R 10/12/06 a 4. S zepan ? , ? !? a6 U .N: jcmE)c'"" FCS 06109 are 30JUN06 C2.3 r? _t r ?r M CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL ,?q? `?? `' ,AF' , ter ,d` C{b xa ?3iron •Rbn NaiE: Winga only it std. so e: eo "ire. Remove Curb if Exislin Conc Drive A A Book Curb Max Slope Q 1.1 0- Max Slope Na(I-ally 6YrrOCa fBgllilp- menta sae Nale A . 1/2" Exp. Joint 6 " 1/2" Exp. Joint Prcoety / R.D.W. UML_ TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION B I I I II B PLAN VIEW Ea ?U o? R c o `a 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R /w Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut a 5' Min Arterial Street 12' County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. Modified and Volley Cutler Curbs 1 1/4" per Foot -?? join exist back of curb 1 ?, . .' . 12 Textured Surface Max Slope •'••:n';;.. Bock of Curb 3000 pd conc 4" thick Constr. 6" rh -.-r- . •. • thick at driveways with 8x6 /pID ?,,y •'. x• welded wire mesh. See note 7. Remove to on 1/Z" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut N01ES SECTION A-A 1. Provide bated jobb at dbtonces matching the width. Also drNsmays. 2 11 physai aluh robn an is wbkh prwvstb 1M p-Ing place expansion jbin of sidesdb r shorn, cadsot tin Enplsermq Division for aitsmab locdlr. 3. Woods and other peers will not be permitted In Wdmft or 4. rk ertttgs of any kind will bs prmltlad r oaearb s a dmrwop Without ped6c approd d Me City Engineer. & All concrete shill be 3000 pd min. 0 28 dap, with fiber == . 6. to be light broom finis. 7. Cana sobrd = construction shall be 6' Wd w Bx8/1000 waldtl e meek reinforce ant. SF( TinN R-R & Raps d a bon a tactile solace, textured to a depth not exasdtp 1/b' byy ur of tamp or roller In aanfamanoe wfih nqut resell o/orFOOT Roadway area iNma Design Statdrds, Dotal 304 r mn recent modMoatbna CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL NOTES. CONCRETE MASONRY WALL CONSTRUCTION 1.) WALLS a.) Now construction: m high and ad Materials, construction and quantity control of masonry stab be In accordance (B x d8*). Materials should uld be be of con crete used with Uniform Building Code (UBC), Chapter 24. General conditions and those es used In consistent with In the e construction of and construction requirements stall be applied as specified in UM Section 2404 (f) architectural style of the principal building. (Section 3-802 during grouted masonry work Materlde) 1. All reinforcing steal shall be deformed bars conforming to ASTM A-615, b.) Exlstihhg maximum 6'-0 high replacement materials can be made of the some materials as ong as they are made of ?e 60. Vertical rokdaornent shall be placed In the center of the masonry cell, and shill be held In position of the top and bottom. approved opaque material. 2. If a slab dowel does not line-up with a vertical care, H shall not be doped 2.) F007INGS more than one horizontal In six verticals (1:8). 8'x18' concrete w/2- #5 continuous rebar Imbedded. 3. Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be standard trues type DUR-O-WALL (or 3.) CONCRETE SLAB equivalent) at 16' ace. Monolithic, mil. 6' thhdmess w/fmbedded 0'x8'/ 1000 welded 4. Hollow Load-bearing Concrete Masonry Units stab be normal weight wire fabric (W.W.F.), 3000 P.S.I. with fiber mesh reinforcing. onforming to ASTM C-90, with a =rn compressive strength of 1,900 4.) CONCRETE FILLED CELLS With 1-#5 vertical rebar tied to footer steel at each comer and 5. Mortar shall be type M or % In accordance with ASTM C-270. Place all every 4' O.C. masonry la running bond with 3/8' mortar Joints. Provide complete coverage face shill meta bedding, horizontal and vertical. 5.) GATES Constructed of min. 1-1/2' diameter galvanized tubular steel S. Coarse pram shall conform to ASTM C-476, with a maximum aggregate size ' w/prMcy-type sate Inserted In galvanized sted mesh Iabrlc, Of 3/8 8 to 10" sump, and a minimum compressive strength of 2,500 PSI at hinge-mounted on mils. 3' diameter galvanized steel posit d yl (Gates and poet constructed and installed per applicable building code by Ileonssd fence contractor). 7 Minimum 3' X 3" deaf-cut holes (saw-cut) are required at the bottom course of all cells to verify grout plaeemonL Clean-cute shall be added after 6.) DROP PIN masonry Inspection-provided M accordance with ACI 531-4.6, and before 1/2' ilia. 18" long metal rod gate latch. Provide 3/4" die hold grouting. 6' into concrete for rods. In asphalt provide a 3/4' P.V.C. & Prior to grouting, the grout space shall be dean, with no mortar projections sleeve, 6' long, or equal. grouter the J¢', mortar droppings or other foreign material. All calls shall be In vertlaal alignment, and shall solidly be filled with coarse grout as specified 7.) SOIL Sol bearing capacity to be at least $500 P.S.F. 9. During placing. grout shall be consolidated with fietdbie cable vibrator. First cut pour shall be stopped a minimum of 1 - 112' below the top of the &) BOLLARD middle bond bean masonry. 3'-6' high, 6" diameter steel pipe bollard filled with concrete. painted traffic yellow, Imbedded 3'-O" deep in 18' concrete CI1Y OF CLFAp1VATER FIOIHDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMIIILSTRATIDA foundation. (See Daton) ENGINEKRlme vas tMre I D ! i I t ! 1 1 i I I ! ! i CITY OF CLEARWATER DE ?IL 4'XB' Interlocking Concrete Pavers, Wash Sand/Cement Mix Into Joints 112' - 3/4' Sand Setting Coarse 6' (Min) Concrete 3000 P Saw Cut Exist. Asph, With Fiber Mesh I f 1 12, r- r-- Existing Asphalt r a 'M 4 1 . . . Y 12' Ex. Base ORIGINAL Z U)ffZQ 130 RECEIVED &O NOV 09 2006 V Zap -_? D ? PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ?EW 0 0< 43 CITY OF CLEARWATER 3 Z Za 1/2' Expansion Joint -y/?//'/j?//??//?//?/? /i//j /i /i•• r\?r • ?r\? •` Stabilized Subgrade FBV 60 2-#4 Deformed Rebar (typ) *At( exposed concrete edges to be hand tooled, PAVING HEADER DETAIL CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL ZL REAR DF DUHPSTER ENCLOSURE WALL SHALL DR: 8 FT. HIGH 7O PRO VIDE ADDITIONAL BUFFERING 0' S'- Tic boom with 1-45 rebar -p- - - - ? 13'-6' swtrlp pots q • 661 dSteel c learance min (typo bOtta6rds coon, Filled (typ) ?° ` 11'-0' e t I 1-65 at 4' q tr i I 8' ; J-P center min s clearance rdn. () O 14 _ lt ' . •M (J I 8 ate no 9 st 8' > • 4' ?t ypy 3000 psl concrete dab ? . ? Mb, L 8'x l b' concrete with fiber mesh reinforcing r - t i 6' i • - - - - i monoD c, m n h 1 1 L w/ B- 65 rebar (typ.) thkdavrea, 6 x6 / 1040 PLAN yy?, pit ELEVATION d.1 S, CITY OF CLEARW T??p, FLOpDA PUBLIC WISTRATIO N ENMEERIM s s/heNV err. war avn r„v I "An wow vas. RA a®Y err wapnt war ma rA onounm err. Tor Ira (n 91 LU D m L7 N Q? V Qn O Fr W n m < 13 C) N ,xm `?J a d m .Q 01 W W D Z4 ?- Z ?e O J ao *x U ?m (n W m W m Zx D Em Zd Wd NO DATB 1 9/5/06 2 10/12/06 a 4. 4 r rv V °M ;? U e 0 s ar N des = S / aM U % 1=Ym •4 P._... L i r1%r%R aKICKIDFCS 71 ,we: 06109 0A1F 30JUN06 eHMT NO. C2.4 CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL WHITE BORDER t y & SYMBOL BLUE BACKGROUND BLACK BORDER PARKING 8Y DISABLED & LETTERS WHITE BACKGROUND PERMIT ONLY BLACK BORDER $Z55 FINE & LETTERS F.S. 318.14 WHITE BACKGROUND ALL LETTERS V SERIES 'C' STANDARD PRE-PAINTED DISABLED PARKING SIGN ON 1/8' THICK SHEET ALUMINUM P N z y VI ? 2' HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED STANDARD WEIGHT STEEL PIPE a I G 8' x 2' x 6' CONCRETE MASS. -III . I ,III v FINISH TOP OF MASS LEVEL WITH A SLIGHT RAISED WASH III- - ?, APPROXIMATELY 112' ABOVE h LEVEL OF TURF/SOD. nl?a. ;u NANDICAFFED SIGN DETAIL , Tn» CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL 2-1/2' min N N V7 7-3/4' -? TYPE A NOTEI Concrete to be 3,000 psi, with flaer nosh relnforclrG 2' min I N N I L e e R3 Bar ?.- 7-1/2' Typical TYPE C A3 Bar CITY OF CLEARWATER DETA _ 5!E NOIX N6 ,11 _ I= TRAM OM f*?W + WE TRmm 1"m MME owww NANDIGAFFED STALL DETAIL NOTE: All pavement mo Wngs to be thermoploefi CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING pn1AYN Br W7E awa®? TYPICAL DOUBLE Im Na t HANDICAPPED STALL DESPOM My M. DATE arsaaa,nl at. E F R ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 09 2006 PLANNING DEPARTIviSNT CITY OF CLEARANATr' .a ae Q t? CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA PUBWC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING Ni?MNI er DATE t ft, MeW RA ID®®pYa? WHEEL STOPS ^r.r aeE?Na ee rJl D 0016 WALK RAID DOMN " SEE IOE1f M0. 1 RAIP DM SEE NCIX N0. Ow- WALK 1 # a a s ,r-d ? e'-d ? 1rdr EC-d Q U SIDE z ?1oo z Q4 ?HW OQ 3Z=< 9 m n w o, 13 FEVEICIM L1J W ,n _ Qm V Qn F O V ? (?} W n Q D ? as m LL ? o W J Z 4 ZQ O J 0 -? a o F I W s W m Zk D ?m Zo Wd NO DATe? t 9/5/06 2 10/12/06 a a a 1512 LL SHEET NO. .41 FCS dae: 06109 30JUN06 C2.5 I? ?J A V ~ nn • "J ; Edge Of Detectable Warning N N I I N?--- 0 0 1' 0 PUN VIE Nt A// Sidewalk Curb f amps Shall Have Detectable Warning Surfaces That Extend The Full Width Of The Ramp And 17 The Direction Of Travel 24 Inches (610 mm) From The Back Of Curb. CURB RAMP DETECTABLE WAM ING \ .QUA.. ?? s?rir? j >4t?' 4° 1P ___0 2.35; Dome Pattern Shall Be In-Line GENERAL NOM With Direction Of Travel __T !. Public sldewolk curb vmpi shall be mnslrroted In the public right of way at locations that will provide cant macs unobstructed pedestrian circulation paths to pedestrian areas, elements std facllith a in the public right of way and to accessible pedestrian radw on T adjacent alter. Curbe facilities with sidewalks and those without sidewalks are to have curb rams constricts t at all street Intersections and at turnouts that have Curbed returns. { O Partial curb returns s fall extend to the limit prescribed by Index No. 515 to accommodate 0.91 curb rampe. Rumple a netnxded at locations without sidewalks shall hove a landlrp Truncated Dome , eonsbucfed at the tai of each ramp, see Sheet 5. 0'P fSee Detali) 0 ? rVfS/ Integral Game P. The location and orJ rniaHon of arrA romps shall be as shown in the plane. 3 curb runnl t of unrestrained s'tes shot! wt be de r than f • re and --0 0 0 0 f 21 Min. Full Height Curb When Crosswalk Markings Are Required, Romp Pours Must Foil Within Crosswalk Limits And Parallel With The Projeoted Crosswalk Alignment Back Of Sidewalk Alignment Varlatlons 4'Mln. 3' Min. a \ VIP NI _ rre of a Crosswalk widths and configuration wry; must conform to index No. 17344 and 11346. TM NCA7W DAYS >- scSrOpui? p?\ u Cab For BACK OF SIDEWALK CURB OR BUFFER TRANSITIONS And For RAMP AND SIDEWALK ?ox?ro CURB OPTIONS See Sheet 4. ti 46+? 2'A In. Full i' 44II He. lht Curb 0 Nate: A portion of one or both ramps ray extend outside the return. o e 1'r?d? T,te Sr omit Jaunts on Curb Ramps Turnout or p Side Street zz??s? UVEM JeYG1eN PMPS T'PICAL PLACEMENT OF PUBLIC SIDEWALK CURB RAMPS AT CURBED RETURNS Carp ng s W eps ps Dross slope ahall be 0.02 r flatter. Traneltllon 8lopas shall rtat be steeper than I r 12. When altering exiath g pedestrian facilities where existing site development precludes the aomam odallon m o now slope of I a 12, a mming slope between 1:12 cod i r 10 is permitted for a rise of 6" maximum and a running slope of between 1110 and I 18 la for crow f? met n the x mnJmum Where lee feasible c cross slope stall he provided. slope cannot be Romp mmning slope . s not required to exceed B' M length, except of sites where the plans specify o greater ler, IM. 4. If a cure rDmp Is !ac ded where pedestrians must walk across the ramp, then the walk shall have transiton slope., to the ramp; the maximum slope of the transitions shall be I, 12 Ramps with curb reN Tw may be used at loactlans where other Improvements provide guidance away from that portC n of Curb perpendloukr to the sidewalk; Improvements for guidance are not required at curb amps for linear pedestrian traffic. 5. Curb ramp detectable warning surfaces shall extend the full width of the ramp and in the direction of travel 2• In from the back of curb. Detectable warning surfaces shall be =k9o acted by texturing a franc Fed dome pattern In conformance with U.S Department of Justice A.D.A. Standards For Awe& Ible Design, A.D.A. Accessibility Guidelines, Section 4.29.2, (detail shown above left). Transli on slopes are not to hove detectable warnings. 6. Unless otherwise an 'ad out in the plans, the ramp detectable warning Surface shall be colored in accordance with S lotion 351 of the Standard Specifications. T. Where o curb ramp h constructed within existing curb, art and gutter and/or sidewalk, the exlefft curb or sirb and gutter shall be removed to the nearest joint beyond the Curb fronsHfons or ft the extent that no remaining eeotlon of curb or Curb and gutter is leas than 5' long. TM existing sidewalk shall be removed to The nearest joint beyond Me transition slope or w 11k around or to the extent that no remaining section of sidewalk to lase than 5'long. 8. Alpha-numerlo Idenh flcatiouw are for reference (plans, permits, etc. J. 9. Public sidewalk curb ramps are to be paid for oe follows: Ragw. reconefrrn fed sidewalks, walk around sidewalks, sidewalk landings and sidewalk curbs are to be , aid for under the contract unit price for Sidewalk Concrete, (_n Thfck ), SY. Curb translt. one and reconstructed curbs are to be paid for under to contract unit price for M, parent curb, i.e., Curb Caro., (T)pe _), IF or Curb and Gutter Canc., (Type _J, LF. When a separate Item for the removal and disposal of existing curb, curb and gutter, and/or sidewalk is r mf provided In the picas, Me cad of removal and dlspaml of these features shall be Inn Oiled In the contract unit price for new curb, curb and gutter and/or sidewalk respeotfvel DESIGN WE S I. The color raWiremer t m General Note 6 is to provide a dark-on-light visual contrast between the detectable wornh g surface and the adjacent walking surface. Where adjacent walking surfaces are colored or are constructed with materials other Man standard Class I Portland Cement Concrete In i cmrdace with Section 522 of ire Stallard Specifictions, Me plans must provide for dell stable warning surface colors or materials fat provide the necessary contrast, elder dork• on•110M or llahf-on-dark. ORIGINAL RECEIVED A2 NOV 0 9 zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAiuck STATE Of FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC SIDEWALK CURB RAMPS M ?- , ^ Nnma Dan Approved Cue t saline ry 8918 10/H Non Dln V in Ina Drawn By ma 10M nv a an e u e. • r Chocked By sec 1D/M 04 f? s ?/? JV-T • -1 i1 ei e 9 FDOT Index #304 z ZQ O 0HIgio C a4 ? ZQ Q C ?FW ?W.Ooa p 3 3ZZQ CLOD., J a LU N Q '( ro Cur ZN V a? 0 L] in r /1 W ND V / 0m LZ$ B. a N .Q WD LU W D Z? ZQ 0 J0 J ao •x V Ma n WN WN ZK 13 M ®W d Nov DATe. t 9/5/06 2. 10/12/06 a A g?,o. 1?xx V. w$ 0c. LLI z °lj`r7 r 1,' FC5 06109 30JUN 66 C2.6 O ?y P r nr e °; M /V s `? Aayg q ? Q r ?/ a 20 O J ? gQ ? y? G I Q ? ?U h i 0 k / ,h _V /? 320 k FF B FF - 3200' z?= .50 ' ' LIE=27.60 A 22 F ? ? N O F ¦ 3200' p ??? 2 FF ¦ 3200' Q f S88°20'45"W, 17524'(M) 175'(8) Aug 3% 3% 3,% '? '??A Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan H ? SCALE: 1" = 20' ?Z? ? I 5?. u / ^ I I /?y II -''? -T.G=31.99` E.IE=26.70' W.IE=26.60' SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA N.88°35'59E, 158,19"M 159,1'(R) 2 STORY CLUBHOUSE r?o r FF • 32.50' g 1 ? 4 STORY BULDING wv, 11-11 T 7 If r'inr%n g tl 111111111111111111 11 40 FT HK)H FF - 32.50' b0 OOL 1 N 5' RCP ® 0.50%'11 Al% / Ir I9 I ?I i FF - 3200 ?yLw VJ ' N 1 'ti ? 326 V1 01 r I ? 3TR#4 ? FF - 32?, -2.6=31.35' - E.IE=27.25'' - ?-b W.IE=27.0 C I b\ 1> J r " ® P, 2 STACK ?4RAGE FF • ?I 3200' ?J co 5//N® a FF - 3250' I =26 0 N 4 STORY BUILDING N 40 FT HOI (MASONRY) FF - 32 50' . Q 8 P 4 V) 25, Zf FF - 3250' i 10 5 0 1p 20 30 FT r r I C'!'%r7KlM LGVCIVU ?? DIRECTION OF FLOW PROPOSED ELEVATION + w^ EXISTING ELEVATION a CONTROL STRUCTURE (SEE DETAIL) RCP DISCHARGE PIPE CONCRETE FLUME (SEE DETAIL) VIZ l00 m = < ?0 %5z<6 3ZzW o.J ?lvmD S I<L (/) a w W W Q< m Q n III z V fn o Im Ln W n 0 Q 13 0 a m .Q W0 LLu W 0 Z 4 Z Q O Q J D -? IL o ?x (n W n W n zx 0 Lm z6 Wd L FEVOONS NO DATE- 1 9/5/06 2. 10/12/06 a It a, l t +z ' ? s I L • y Kzl- 0 $ F - ORIGINAL; ; ? O's RECEIVED £ ?a ^? ea » 14' NOV 0 9 2006 Pff PLANNING DEPARI'M?" a e 9SR CITY OF CLEARWA.T'S FCS am 06109 aT'-30JUN06 SHMCNo' 3,1 -- -.F-%r 11 T\/ Ar0'1 T1/1\ 1 1 A 1 rMUI'CR I T JCIi I IVIN H ? - r ? IL -4 L -.I I, 'I il_ F . t l I ? ? - 33 4 ; tr y r, i m r - 171 - r' r t r - t r;t - t r+ I" "- t. . ? .; + a f r r I; i i 2 L4 ? 7 14 iJ .. 4- : Q LK I 1 t f . L . + 1 _.. ' 1 t? L 1 L = z 1. _r ' t 1 + + 1 t L . . . -I1 L ? Ll ? .__ ?-r h r - _ - 1 T - ! - _L I t .L . Z - . Y t ? i ' _ L H 4 _ t : ? ' : . k + F t F +- . .. 2 - 'r I + - _ r l_ r. -? - ,? .•j' I- + _ + k _ _?- - (A _ r 'G E W r W L - - t -I , 31 - en r 4 rt _ i. 7 F N -' L L _ -' T- 31 30 k r ? . - IIW ? : I, 41> Il l W II - f 4 11 I A 1 V l a l I j l f - I 1 1 1. 4 f 1 ` ' I 4, I l W I f I a } NI E I l y . T - _ r 1 . t 0 9 • . + _.? ( Ala Ilrl T i L 4 ` a l -1a f _T 4 L LW= U 5 p . t - .I ? Rl d - - L L _ _ 1_ _.+ .. J - _ . . - - ]-[ -H - I44 4- - I-- t r-I - - 1 1 C _ . k 29 ? _ - k 4 L - 28 - - '+ ? , {. I , + L ? 1 _? .. .It . - - r 28 ? L L y LL L LL _ + f ? l -f t ? _ r ? ++} C 27 r - f tt 1 + 1 T - ? t i r r 7 - T 1 _ + ? I ` L { F • ' + R ... L I - ? 27 26 ? - ? - ._?. J -- - -I - T 7i ? L - 1- I . I V ± - L _ Lf 26 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 [- POND SECTION 'B' - L L i T ?- ? - ?- - 33 I I 11 1 r " i 1 1 n ?- - 7r + 1 33 1 - fp + - - 32 _ - i - - ?- - -r t - - - 1- , 31 T a 31 ? I 30 ? r , I I I I I I II 29 i 1 - _ O E t Pu R t I i I I 7 I - - i I 1 I 2 . 1 I _ L _ I I I 1 I 26 H 28 27 r , f r 27 26 1 T 26 i I 25 - - - + L LL t 25 24 k - L - ? - T + f - T r 24 I I I i I ' I - I i 231 1 1 ' r 'r r , 1 7 7 T T I T 23 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 NPDES NOTIFICATION FAILURE TO MAINTAIN EROSION AND/OR SEDIMENT CONTROLS, OR AN ILLICIT DISCHARGE RESULTING FROM THEIR FAILURE WILL LIKELY RESULT IN FINE CITATIONS. nnAnIK1n KIn-rrr+ vIvwnvv 114w I w CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AU HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES, ACCESS AISLES, LOADING ZONES AND RAMPS COMPLY WITH THE ADA AND CABO/ANSI STANDARDS. SLOPES OF HANDICAPPED PARKING AND LOADING AREAS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER (IN WRITING) OF ANY PROBLEM AREAS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL NECESSARY RELATED CORRECTIONS. ALL ORGANIC MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH THE FOOTINGS, SLABS AND PAVEMENT AND REPLACED WITH COMPACTED INORGANIC GRANULAR BACKFILL. EXCAVATION OF UNSUITABLE MATERIALS SHOULD EXTEND A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 5' BEYOND THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REQUIRED SITE PREPARATION REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION. ALL IMPERVIOUS SITE AREA DRAINAGE IS DESIGNED TO FLOW TO THE PROPOSED CATCH BASINS AND PIPED TO THE PROPOSED RETENTION POND AT THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTES Z ??ZQ _R?Cp Z ?4 Q eL??W + a3 Q ,3?/ZZa Ii.Qp? Q ?l1mp a V) to N L.U LL N (? h Qr Zro V ? W ro 0 I Q 0" O:p aro M Q N ? L1.1 w o w ? Z 4 ZQ O J ap (n W ro W n Z0 m ?m Zp Wd NP DA16 1 9/5/06 2 10/12/06 a S V ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION MUST CON M TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET DOWN A OF CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT, ZONING'. AND/OR RELATED ORDINANCES. r a THERE WILL BE NO UNFAVORABLE DRAINAGE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AS A RESl1N,T±ry ' OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON N.A.V.D. DATUM 1988. FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION: THE SITE APPEARES TO BE IN THE FOLLOWING ZONE(S). COMMUNTY PANEL No.: 12IOJCOI06H FLOOD ZONE: ZONE X REVISED MAP DATE: MAY 17, 2005 OUR FIRM ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF 7HIS DETERMINATION. THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY HAVE JURISDI77ON OVER SUCH MATTERS. $° OpNi 'Sn • r Zni' ? `? d •1 .ceO 1U °e 'fib E = M n 0" aee eo: FCS 06109 wE 30JUN06 1 17 NO, C32 PAVING, GRADING, DRAINAGE NOTES GRADING AND BACKFILL: THE GRADING SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS INTENDED TO EXPRESS THE GENERAL GRADING INTENT OF THE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR IS EXPECTED TO GRADE THE ENTIRE SITE TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL AREAS THROUGHOUT THE SITE. SMOOTH TRANSITIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN CONTOURS OR SPOT ELEVATIONS A SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO ACCOMPLISH THE GRADING INTENT. ALL SLOPES SHALL BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINAL GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED. CONTRACTOR TO GRADE PROPERTY SO THAT GRADING MEETS ADJACENT PROPERTY AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ELEVATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO DEMOBILIZATION OF GRADING EQUIPMENT TO DETERMINE THAT THE GRADING INTENT HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. ALL FILL MATERIAL SHALL BE SOIL OR SOIL-ROCK MIXTURE WHICH IS FREE FROM ORGANIC MATTER AND OTHER DELETERIOUS SUBSTANCE. IT SHALL BE PREDOMINATELY GRANULAR WITH A MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE OF TWO INCHES AND A PLASTICITY INDEX OF 12 OR LESS. ALL BACKFILL WITHIN THE ROADWAY, OVER ANY PIPE THAT IS TO BE INSTALLED UNDER THE ROADWAY OR WITHIN EMBANKMENTS, ETC. IS TO BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY AASHTO-99 AND PER F.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 125.8.3, LATEST EDITION. CONTRACTOR MUST ASSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS FOR ALL NATURAL AND PAVED AREAS. 2. GRADES SHOWN AT ENTRANCES ARE DESIGN GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE GRADING IN THESE AREAS WITH THE EXISTING FEATURES IN THE FIELD AND OR CURRENT DESIGN DRAWINGS. IF A CONFLICT EXISTS BETWEEN THE DESIGN GRADES AND THE CURRENT GRADES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO SITE WORK. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AT NO ADDITIONAL COST ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, CLEANOUTS, VAULTS, BOXES AND GRATES, EXISTING AND PROPOSED TO "AS-CONSTRUCTED" FINISHED GRADE. 4. DRAINAGE: ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PER FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD DESIGN STANDARDS. MITERED END SECTION AS PER D.O.T. INDEX NO. 272 AND NO. 273. ALL PIPE LENGTHS ARE PLUS OR MINUS AND MEASUREMENTS ARE TO THE CENTER OF STRUCTURES. 5. PAVING: ALL PAVING SURFACES IN INTERSECTIONS AND ADJACENT SECTIONS SHALL BE GRADED TO DRAIN POSITIVELY IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN BY THE FLOW ARROWS ON THE PLANS AND TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION WITH NO BREAKS IN GRADE AND NO STEEP OR REVERSE CROSS SLOPES. AT APPROACHES TO AND INTERSECTIONS WITH EXISTING GRADES, IT MAY BE NECESSARY AND ADVISABLE TO MAKE MINOR LOCAL FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO ACCOMPLISH THE PURPOSES OUTLINED. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AND THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONSULTED SO THAT WE MAY MAKE ANY AND ALL REQUIRED INTERPRETATIONS OF THE PLANS OR GIVE SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCOMPLISH THE INTENT OF THE PLANS. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE - TYPE S-1, SHALL CONFORM TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION, FOR MATERIALS AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL ROADWAY BASES SHALL BE PRIMED AND, IF REQUIRED, A TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED. ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, LATEST EDITION. TEST REPORTS FOR SUBGRADE, BASE, ASPHALT AND BASE CORE AND CONCRETE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC TESTING REQUIREMENTS. 6. ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM WITH MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, ZONING AND/OR RELATED ORDINANCES. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF ENTRANCES, EXITS, RAMPS, DOWNSPOUTS, ETC. PRIOR TO STARTING SITE WORK. 8. CONCRETE: CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. PORTLAND CEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C150. AGGREGATE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C33. WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A185, READY MIXED CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-94. SIX INCH MESH, 10 GAUGE WIRE FABRIC SHALL BE USED IN SLABS THICKER THAN FOUR INCHES. STANDARD THICKNESS SHALL BE FOUR INCHES, EXCEPT AT DRIVEWAYS WHERE THE THICKNESS SHALL BE SIX INCHES. SURFACES SHALL BE FREE FROM TROWEL OR MACHINE MARKS. SURFACE VARIATIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/4 INCH UNDER A 10 FOOT STRAIGHTEDGE. EDGE OF SLABS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH FINISH. SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE A BROOM FINISH. TCCTIAIr`_ Cr%UC:n1 II C 1'-%I 11MC: 1 L_ %J I IIYV vvl ILUULLL %.;;I Li I L.11 ITEM TEST TYPE TEST I.D. REQUIREMENTS FREQUENCY EMBANKMENT MAXIMUM DENSITY AASHTO T180 N/A PER SOIL TYPE OPTIMUM MOISTURE ASTM D1557 FIELD DENSITY AASHTO T191, T204, 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY ONE PER 2,500 S.F. T238 HORIZONTALLY *• ASTM D1556, D2937, D2922 ALTERNATING LIFTS (12") UTILITY TRENCH MAXIMUM DENSITY AASHTO T180 N/A PER SOIL TYPE BACKFILL UNDER OPTIMUM MOISTURE ASTM D1557 ROADWAYS AND FIELD DENSITY PASHTO T191, T204, T238 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY ONE PER 2,500 S.F. STRUCTURES HORIZONTALLY *• EVERY 2' VERTICALLY ASTM D1556, D2937, D2922 D2922 - AT LEAST ONE FOR EACH PIPE RUN BACKFILL OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AASHTO T180 N/A PER SOIL TYPE STRUCTURES OPTIMUM MOISTURE ASTM D1557 FIELD DENSITY AASHTO T191, T204, 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY ONE PER 2,500 S.F. T238 EVERY 2' VERTICALLY ASTM D1556, D2937, D2922 SUBGRADE BEARING VALUES LBR - FLA. D.O.T. LBR = 40 MIN. ONE PER SOIL TYPE CHECK POINT LBR AT 500 L.F. HORIZONTALLY MAXIMUM DENSITY AASHTO T180 N/A ONE PER SOIL TYPE OPTIMUM MOISTURE ASTM D1557 FIELD DENSITY & AASHTO T191, T238 98% OF MAXIMUM ONE PER 2,500 S.F. THICKNESS ASTM D1556, D2922 DENSITY HORIZONTALLY BASE BEARING VALUES LBR - FLA. D.O.T. LBR = 100 MIN. ONE PER SOURCE OR AS MATERIAL CHANCES CHECK POINT LBR AT 500 L.F. HORIZONTALLY MAXIMUM DENSITY AASHTO T180 N/A ONE PER SOURCE OPTIMUM MOISTURE ASTM D1557 THICKNESS AASHTO T191, T238 98% OF MAXIMUM ONE PER 2,500 S.F. FIELD DENSITY ASTM D1556, D2922 DENSITY HORIZONTALLY GRADATION AASHTO T27, T98 PER SPECIFICATIONS ONE PER SOURCE AASHTO T90 ATTERBURG LIMITS ASTM C136, D423, D424 SOIL CEMENT BASE PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOC. PER SPECIFICATIONS ONE PER SOIL TYPE MIX DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS (TO BE USED I MAXIMUM DENSITY 4 AASHTO T1 N/A ONE PER SOIL TYPE DAILY 5 PARATION B ETWEEN OPTIMUM MO STURE (STANDARD) SHWT AND BOTTOM COMPRESSiVE STRENGTH PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOC. 300 PSI AT 7-DAYS ONE SET OF 3 PER SOIL TYPE OF BASE IS < 1.5') SPECIMENS SPECIFICATIONS TYPE DAILY ** TEST CORES PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOC. 450 PSI AT 21-DAYS ONE SET OF 3 PER SOIL TYPE SPECIFICATIONS SET OF COMPRESSIVE ** FIELD DENSITY & AASHTO T191, T238 95% OF MAXIMUM ONE PER 2,500 S.F. THICKNESS ASTM D1556, D2922 DENSITY HORIZONTALLY ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MATERIALS QUALITY AASHTO T164 BITUMEN CONTENT ASTM D2172 GRADATION PER SPECIFICATIONS ONE PER DAY FIELD DENSITY ASTM 02950-81 95% OF LAB DENSITY ONE PER 2,500 S.F. COMPACTION 95% OF MARSHALL MAXIMUM UNIT HORIZONTALLY . LOS ANGELES AASHTO T96-77 ' ABRASION ASTM C131-81 PER SPECIFICATIONS tr c1 ONE PER SOURCE THICKNESS N/A PER SPECIFICATIONS ONE PER 2,500 S.F. „ w NOTES: * THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT PAVE OVER SOIL CEMENT BASE UNTIL A 30-DAY CURING HAS ELAPSED. ** MAXIMUM STRENGTH LIMITS, AS ESTABLISHED BY SOILS TESTING COMPANY, SHALL NOT BE EXCEEDED. ' *** SHOULD ANY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN CONFLICT WITH EITHER THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, AND/OR THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, THEN THE AFOREMENTED RECOMMENDATIONS r WILL SUPERCEDE THIS "TESTING SCHEDULE GUIDE". ? r ORIGINAL RECEIVED N I OV 09 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER 0 ?oz< Joe -a .Z -CD Zmj Q L.ODQ 3ZZa U-0 D, v V) m o w 1Y N W a% ED rv Qm V Q N OF U n V} W N 0 4 m L Z a a N *Q N Lu a o W Z ZQ O < J e J ao • I U mm (n W a WN Zx 0 ?m z6 W d NO DATE t 9/5/06 2 10/12/06 a q)OSll,lt 4 ^5 00 LL a .4 Q A ? w Z 1u y C oa ? r ;? r 0 ? to &D-1 lo "I L! VSR FCS 06109 30JUN06 C3.3 BAFFLE TYP. 6"0 HOLE U) (0 O I in 12" 6" N I O SID OI BROOM FINISH U.O.N. `5Z¢4 ? r 6" PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (3,000 PSI) W ??h WITH 6"X6"-W4.0XW4.0 W.W.M. ( PROVIDE CONST. JTS. ?..ODa 12' O.C. APPLY LIQUID ASPHALT AT ALL JOINTS d BETWEEN CONCRETE AND ASPHALT. 3 Z za 12" SUBGRADE - COMPACTED TO 98% MOD PROCTOR "-W AND HAVE MIN. LBR VALVE OF 40%. J vmD J PLAN ON-SITE CONCRETE PAVEMENT d " ' " 6 5 -0 EDGE OF POND N071=: to m + N RETAINING WALL ABOVE SPECS ARE MINIMUM SPECS. VERIFY THIS ' Ill W m CONSTRUCTION WITH ENGINEER S SOILS REPORT. SUBGRADE BASE AND TOPPING SHALL MEET OR ?--- m N Q Q m , , ' Z 3000 P.S.I. CONC. EXCEED FDOT, CITY OF CLEARWATER AND ENGINEER S r #4 BARS 12" O.C. 6X6, 10X10, W.W.M. SOILS REPORT REQUIREMENTS. Q F SECTION "A - A" c? W o ?xm " zJ a. m No 3 ENERGY DISSIPATOR DETAIL 1 PAVING SPECIFICATIONS w W Z IL NOT TO SCALE C .4 C3•4 NOT TO SCALE Z > Q ¢ e O ? -I d 0 • z 3'-4" W N W n " Zk 42 HIGH WROUGT IRON GUARD ' ' Z A RAIL CONSTRUCT PER CODE REQ TYPE C INLET Z 6 , . 1 - #5 REINF. ROD CONTINUOUS 2 1/4" 2 1/ w d POURED CONCRETE CAP CONT. 6" FINISH GRADE ? ° A .. "" 4 MIN, to A I NR DATE: ? t 9/5/06 " 10/12/06 1 1/2 _ a STUCCO FINISH AND COLOR a Z TO MATCH BUILDING FINISH fl a FINISH GRADE -- 8' CMU W/ TRUSS TYPE HORIZ. " L 1 1/" X 1 1/2" X 1/8" X i" L 2 3'- G. CL ® 16" O 9 GA JOINT REINF C WITH 3/8" ANCH. X 6" + 2" 5` . z CI? Ld . . . . ALL CELLS FILLED SOLID W/ 3'-4" Iti n • • : ry ,, 3,000 P.S.I. CONC. (MAX. 3/8 PLAN SIZE AGGREGATE). z 1 - #5 SPACED 8" O.C. W/ 10" H'K IN FTG ORIGINAL 5-#5 CONT. W/ #3 TIES AT 36" O.C. RECEIVED 3000 PSI CONCRETE FTC 4 P'0V 0 91006 , PLANNING DEPA RTM J, CITY OF CLEAR Q WAf' 2'-0" 2" HEAVY DUTY H-20 GRATE 2" CLEAR #4 ®12" (SIDES AN TYPICAL ro d$i ies 10 fr `? oo !IJ ° ?; .C. E. 71. J D BOTTIVI5D e ° . a Ks'n 0 A s 'IP'9 ? ?51R I CHECKED: FCS O SECTION "A-A" 06109 I DATE, 30JUN06 4 POND RETAINING WALL DETAIL 2 NOT TO SCALE CATCH BASIN SHET NO. C3.4 C3 44 NOT TO SCALE C3.4 A III - - No- a CCf DOhMNIUM BLDQ 4 STORIES I _.... - FOOTPF*ff 4138 80. FT. 6 P I O,' II EXISTING ., W II FIRE ti W i II HYDRANT II I 4 Z I I it REiCiNf10N I p W III POND 6 II EXISTING LJ STACK I I BACK FLOW GARAGE PREVENTION I I DEVICE II DDCVA ti III WATER METER II ? II I I II 6'C11 II III r FS FS S - i? L_ 3 GV 11 w - v -? it w? w? w- w- w. Gv S,88020'45'W 17524-(M) 175'(R) WET TAP VAL VE/SLE u II Utility Plan 10 5 0 10 20 30 FT SCALE: 1" = 20' 0 z 1_7`s-. I GARAGE N P' I 2 STACK OAFUvGE--- I 4 2 STACK l0 2'y GARAGE 4 I f 0 N ---- - 2 GARAGE E ( 1 O -- 3 Q3 ? - (f^ vJ LEGEND w - w - WATER LINE o- SS - SANITARY CLEAN OUT SANITARY SEWER - ss - ss - 4" ® 1 % SLOPE 6" ® 0.66% SLOPE (SCH. 40) - FL - FL - FIRE LINE (C-900) - Fs Fs - FIRE SPRINKLER (C-900) © FIRE PUMP (1000 GPM) W/ DOUBLE CHECK VALVE FDC FIRE DEPT. CONN- ECTION W/ DOUBLE CHECK VALVE FIRE HYDRANT W/ GATE VALVE DDCVA DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK VALVE H SITE LIGHT - NOTE 1. ALL UTILITY LINES AND PIPES, INCLUDING INDIVIDUAL DISTRIBUTION LINES, SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT. 2. THE OVERHEAD POWER LINES SHALL BE RELOCATED AND INSTALLED UNDERGROUND . ' . r f iy C")- w : ; , " J ?Prl / J LV ORIGINAL ?y.+ r RECEIVED f 's ?• MOV 0 91006 PLANNING DEPARTi Fw. CITY OF CLEAPW.o z ?cpza bo jo m io z Z <4 ?... xa ?HW 4?.Ooa 3ZZa Wv?J J rA m W Ir m Z' V <? N O (!) W o ILs n .Q ? mo LJJ W D tL_ Z 4 ZQ J I? Oa .I Lu M I (n W N W m Z X 0 0 Wd FEMMONS Na DAT t 9//06 2 10/12/06 a 11/2/06 I ?'• • • .; ?r I Q ([ r N 1'uf ? Imp Z 0 O Ct ? h?1? ~ 3m ?? F7 ; o ? YhtttjD ? VSR ICEC"`? FCS 06109 30JUN06 SHM NO. C4.1 D.I.P. SHALL BE USED IN PLACE OF P.Y.C. OR V.C.P. FOR A MIN. OF 10' EACH WAY FROM OF WATER VAIN WHEN THE VERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN POTABLE WATER MAIN AND THE /SEWER/SEVER FORCE/ RECLAIMED WATER AND STORY SEWER MAWS IS LESS THAN 18'. GRADE WATER MAIN A C. OR Y.C.P. SEWER GRAVITY MAW SA. SERER FORCE YAW RRCLIR® WATER MAIN STORM DRAIN VERTICAL CLEARANCE GRADE rn:.p\?A;G?\.r'.nvi. kil\.?"\\\..??.a'inu\•1?:?\`%? I -POTABLE WATER MAW 10' Rg???pWpJ SAN. SEWER T WATRR, GRAVITY HAII7 OR FORCE YAW HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE NOTE: CLEARANCES BETWEEN POTABLE WATER & STORM SEWER MAINS ARE TO BE TREATED THE SAME AS FOR SANITARY. STANDARD DETAIL MAIN & CLEARANCES OR TEE NOTES (1) USE 2. #14 GAUGE, SOLID COPPER STRAND WIRE WITH COLOR CODED INSULATION PER SERVICE. (2) THERE IS TO BE SUFFICIENT SLACK IN TRACER WIRE TO EXTEND A MIN. OF 12" ABOVE VALVE BOX. (3) WIRE IS TO CONTINUE THROUGH TEES ON MAIN LINE WHERE NO VALVES EXIST. (4) ATTACH WIRE TO TOP CENTER LINE OF MAIN USING DUCT TAPE OR APPROVED EQUAL 0 5'- 0" INTERVALS (5) DUMMY BOXES ARE TO BE INSTALLED WHERE NEW CONSTRUCTION TIES INTO EXISTING, AND ON FIRE LINES WITH DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLIES WHERE MAIN ENTERS BUILDING IF NO VALVE IS INSTALLED (6) DUMMY BOXES ARE TO CONSIST OF A TOP SECTION OF A VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY ENCASED IN A CONCRETE PAD PER STANDARD DETAIL 1 SD-13 ". TYPICAL LOCATOR WIRE INSTALLATION DETAIL CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL Curb Stop f MUELLER H24350 or Ford Compression with Lock Wong and use meter Inlet (3/4' 1' 1/ use peter swivel nut, 1-1/2' or 2' use FIP outlet) or approved Q equal Water Service Tubing Driscopipe 5100 or Endot/Yardley Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene Water Main NOTES L WATER MAINS TO BE (IN NORTH or EAST SIDE OF RO,W„ APPROX, 4 FT, BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. 2, SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT, FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET NIL 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION, DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. 3, ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED AND PRESSURE TESTED (TEST FOR ONE FOUR B 150 P,S.IJ UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE TESTING AND CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. Q4 TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER 6 SANITARY SEWER LINES, 5. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO MAINS, 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE FOT LESS THAN 36'. Q Threaded Corporation Stop MUELLER B-25008 or approved equal (Tap at 45' Angle) I QIron service saddle Ford FC 202 serles w/stainless steel band and epoxy coated ductile Iron body or approved ORIGINAL RECEIVED MOO 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEM CITY Of CLEARWA- A1t-1TC0 IYt/ I LV 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUIRED TESTING. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR IS TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND INVERTS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL DISTURBED RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE FINISHED. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY PUBLIC WORKS 24 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK IN THE COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE, PAVERS OR LANDSCAPING FOR GRADE VERIFICATIONS. 5. ANY TRENCHES THAT PASS WITHIN 20' OF THE TRUNK OF AN EXISTING TREE MUST BE HAND DUG AND ANY ROOTS OVER 1" IN DIAMETER MUST BE TRENCHED UNDER TO ALLOW THE ROOT TO REMAIN IN TACK. -UTILITY CONTACTS ,R POTABLE WATER: CITY OF CLEARWATER A \ SANITARY SEWER: PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPT. . . 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. r ,# U ' CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 I` (727) 562-4960 IRRIGATION: RECLAIMED WATER A "? ELECTRICAL: PROGRESS ENERGY 2166 PALMETT 1 O ST. BLDG F CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 RENE MARTIN (727) 562-5662 TELEPHONE: VERIZON FLORIDA 1778 PARK AVE. NORTH, SUITE 200 MAITLAND, FLORIDA 32751 KARRIE SNYDER (407) 539-2313 V• Z VS" Z 4 ? _a ' Q b yI E"00 ?QZ Z ?O b (n a „ W M N (? N a? Z U aro O ?n CFi in F /1 W N VF o 13 Q E3E3 h m 4 as k Q N 0 LLJ M it W13 Za ZQ O J aj 0 k U Im (n W N Win Zx 0 ID z6 Wd FIEVISIONS N0c DATB t 9/5/06 2 10/12/06 a ai r; l}, l40?,? ? ? A 8 ML w l _ dU 8 C UW s? I WNVSR FCS JOB: 06109 30JUN06 SHEET NO. C4.2 CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL I o o a Top View Approved Backflow Ford Meter Flange Prevention DevlcWtanged) Ford Angle Valve(F(anged) Flow 0 A-1.0- Meter (Flanged) NITM Dabs ma be Rutalked IeveL C d L d fH 4,M 1201 3 N TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICH 112' and 2' MODELS N AppRavro RA, DEVICES ¦ APPROVED DOID LEOM VALVES lMsay-Deem I- I FRP 11 Hervey-8eero NodN FDC Watts Nodal 909 or 009 Vans Model 709 or 007 Conbroco 40=1 Corkraco 40100 FOOT Type S-3 Asph. Conc. patch to be 2' mint thickness or match existing for thickness In excess rem I I- Replace Pacted amrs"\ Replacement base mate lot shall be approved by er y 22 t En Ineer JB*ckfIIt T•Thldoxss o/ oMDbal Ban h /f Resurface full width of street on Base on It s a o on s Varies ASPHALT STREET AND DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT REQUIRED FOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTION If this point Is within 4' of an 4' Min. existin MrnmOthic Slab joint, then 3,000 psi 7M Fiber Mesh anve V S rE,.d.tIm?.Conc,.te W 1B' Trench 19' Min, Width Min. Varies sturbed Trench Side acted ;fill Ti' untS W e- ds 6', then Ter CONCRETE REPLACE MENT REQUIRED FOR UTI LITY CONSTRUCTION CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT SETTING n,t.s. a c r i Back of Curb Max, IS' -Min, 4' or 18' Min. Edge of Pavement 24' Distance Varies ?•Valve Box ?4"MATMW WW I T_ / C E N I u Mech, Joint Valve ONLY APPROVED & Kennedy Guardian No. K-81D Muller Centurian No. A-423 U.S, Pipe Metropolitan NOTES- I Restraining Joint (Typ.) L Steamer Connection to Face Street, 2, All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1/4' Valve Seat. 3. Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street Corners or In the R.O.W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines Whenever Possible. 1 9M Redsed Note GL& 4, See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections & Fitting ees eea?e wM UTILITY NOTES UTILITIES: ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE BASE AND SURFACE COURSES ARE CONSTRUCTED. SITE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING ALL UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES, WHETHER INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR NOT. CHECK WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PRIOR TO BID SUBMISSION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY MEASURES TO MINIMIZE INTERRUPTIONS OF EXISTING UTILITY SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND CONNECTION OF PROPOSED SERVICE LINES. CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER LINES AND STORM/SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS ARE TO BE RESOLVED BY ADJUSTING WATER LINES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF TEN FOOT (10') HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OR 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION WHERE UNDERGROUND SERVICES CONFLICT. PIPE MEASUREMENTS ARE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURES AND ALL LENGTHS ARE PLUS OR MINUS. 03 z ?cnza I00 m? Z1a4 aC I U5 L0 Iz `..DOa do4; 3ZzW ao 6'1 ?vmO v L n M N W WN 0 N Q m U aro t; ??O/ 11- V/ 0 in e /1 W NC V? 7, C m a d M *a B1 a W ?o W ZQ Z4 O J? ---? IL D _ *I U M? (n W N WN Zx a ?m Z O Wd 2. REFER TO THE PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. NO, DATB 1 9/5/06 3. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF 1 10112/06 ANY NEW PIPE LINES. , a 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THE EXACT LOCATION OF UTILITY ENTRANCES WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ??• . K? # 5. WATER MAINS: ALL NEW WATER MAINS, PIPES, FITTINGS, VALVES, PACKING AND JOIeAQ • =coo p '•', . MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE AWWA STANDARDS AND THE STATP:? %: _ PLUMBING CODE AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE AWWA: • ' °?? o, STANDARDS AND/OR THE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES. ALL WATMI-)• 4 MAIN PIPES AND FITTINGS SHALL CONTAIN NO MORE THAN EIGHT PERCENT LEAD.' A U) go ':- STONES FOUND IN WATER MAIN TRENCHES SHALL BE REMOVED TO A DEPTH OF AT * " SF= " LEAST SIX INCHES BELOW THE BOTTOM OF THE PIPE. CONTINUOUS AND UNIFORM', : J ', `=N [ ?; BEDDING TO BE PROVIDED AND BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE TAMPED IN LAYERS AROUND THE PIPE AND FITTINGS AND TWELVE INCHES (12") ABOVE THE TOP OF THEE * N ? ' ?, ? PIPE TO ADEQUATELY SUPPORT AND PROTECT THE PIPE. ALL NEW WATER MAINS SHALL--,e ; ba'' - BE PRESSURE AND LEAK TESTED PER AWWA STANDARD C600 AND DISINFECTED PER ;S .9 y AWWA STANDARD C651 AND RULE 62.555.345,F.A.C.. ALL FOUR INCH (4") AND LARGER `r It 1'a.,tti' ? WATER MAINS TO BE C 900 P.V.C. AND ALL SMALLER WATER MAINS TO BE SCHEDULE 40 P.V.C. WATER MAIN TO BE 2.5' (MIN.) BELOW PROPOSED GRADE. 0R"' VSR 6. FIRE HYDRANTS AND WATER MAINS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, FLUSHED AND UNDER p1EcKm: FCS PRESSURE BEFORE ANY COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED . SANITARY SEWER 7 ALL SANITARY SEWER MAINS TO BE SDR-35 P V C 06109 . : . . . 8. STORM SEWER PIPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS; RCP CLASS III PER ASTM C-76 WITH 0 30JUN06 , , RING GASKETS. ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH suer No. PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING LIDS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS ^ SHALL BE 6" OVER FINISHED GRADE, LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". PVC ??,3 PIPE SHALL BE SDR-35. METALLIC LOCATING WIRE /- NON-METALLIC WARNING TAPE FASTENED TO PIPE - FINISHED GRADE T 12" MAX. T 12" MAX. PLAN • S 2D SECTION T•T NOTE: PIPE SHALL BE CONTINUOUSLY SUPPORTED FOLLOWING BACKFILL, THE MAXIMUM BELL HOLE EXCAVATION WILL BE AS SHOWN. EXCAVATION AT PPE BELL N.T.S. SCALE: NONE GENERAL DETAILS STANDARD DETAL NUMBEN DAIS 12 01 7 : - - RLE,-EVIPBELDwG EXCAVATION AT PIPE BELL /1?f? G-LI PVC WATER MAIN, FORCE MAIN OR RECLAIMED WATER MAIN METALLIC LOCATING WIRE NOTES: 1. ALL NONMETALLIC PIPE SHALL REQUIRE CONTINUOUS INSULATED METALLIC LOCATING WIRE (14 GAUGE COPPER) CAPABLE OF DETECTION BY A CABLE LOCATOR AND SHALL BE BURIED DIRECTLY ABOVE THE CENTERLINE OF THE PIPE 2. THE TRACING WIRE SHALL BE CENTERED ON ALL PIPE ONCLUDING SERVICES) AND TIED INTO ALL HYDRANTS, VALVE BOXES AND METER BOXES. TESTING FOR CONTINUITY IS REQUIRED. 3. USE VINYL TIE-STRAPS AS NECESSARY TO HOLD WIRE DIRECTLY ON THE TOP OF THE PIPE. DUCT TAPE SHALL NOT BE USED. /. WIRE CONNECTIONS MUST BE CLAMPED TOGETHER AND SEALED FOR MOISTURE. S. ALL WIRE SPLICE LOCATIONS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE AS43UILT DRAWINGS. S. WIRE AND WARNING TYPE SHALL BE COLOR CODED AS FOLLOWS WATER: BLUE SEWER: GREEN RECLAIMED: PURPLE PPE LOCATM V NE DEfAL N.T.S. SCALE: NONE GENERAL DETAILS STUroum T A N DATE 6-3-02 AIL GM DE BE : RM -- -LOC.ow PIPE LOCATING VARE DETAIL ??Q SEPARATION FOR WATER /SEWER CONFLICTS 1. SANITARY SEWERS, FORCE MAINS AND STORM SEWERS SHOULD ALWAYS CROSS UNDER WATER MAINS. SANITARY SEWERS, FORCE MAINS AND STORM SEWERS CROSSING WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE INVERT OF 2 THE UPPER PIPE AND THE CROWN OF THE LOWER PIPE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. WHERE SANITARY SEWERS, FORCE MAINS AND STORM SEWERS MUST CROSS A WATER MAIN WITH LESS THAN 18 INCHES VERTICAL DISTANCE, BOTH THE SEWER AND THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AT THE CROSSING. SUFFICIENT LENGTHS OF DIP MUST BE USED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 10 FEET BETWEEN ANY TWO JOINTS. ALL JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE CROSSING MUST BE LEAK FREE AND MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED. A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARENCE OF 6 INCHES MUST BE MAINTAINED AT THE CROSSING. WHERE THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE TO SEWER PIPES CROSSING OVER THE WATER MAIN, THE CRITERIA FOR MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN LINES AND 10 FEET BETWEEN JOINTS SHALL BE REQUIRED. ALL CROSSINGS SHALL BE ARRANGED SO THAT THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS 3. AND THE WATER MAIN PIPE JOINTS ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE POINT OF CROSSING (PIPES CENTERED ON THE CROSSING). 0 Z 00< ?DO tli ? g?irD Z a<L Gr:r=a ?I,-W 4o p /?3fooJ ',r•Y, v ?S W W J v V) N 0 LLI lz N L9 N Qr z N V QLrv O V / V in V) W N 0 Q 113 ? (z$ L d N k Q LLl w o Z4 Z Q O Je -J L J k V Cm (n W N W N Zx 0 nm z6 Wd FEVISIONS NO DATE 1 9/5/06 2 10/12/06 a WHERE A NEW PIPE CONFLICTS WITH AN EXISTING PIPE THE NEW PIPE , SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP AND THE CROSSING SHALL BE a ARRANGED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE. .fie +F?? A MINIMUM 10 FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAIN `? BETWEEN ANY TYPE OF SEWER & WATER MAIN IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIC (I • W • WHENEVER POSSIBLE.':' E7 y'. =Fz IN CASES WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN 10 FOOT HORIZ01?f ° cis 59 ? ?' z • SEPARATION THE WATER MAIN MUST BE LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCFt r) C . ON AN UNDISTURBED EARTH SHELF LOCATED ON ONE SIDE OF TI E`• ' U fl Sri ; SEWER OR FORCE MAIN AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SE1 ? Y0 x ^ WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN A VERTICAL DISTANCE OF INCHES IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE ??11VSR CONSTRUCTED OF DIP AND THE SEWER OR THE FORCE MAIN SHALL BE DNEaEo- CONSTRUCTED OF DIP WITH A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 6 INCHES. FCS THE WATER MAIN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABOVE THE SEWER. JOINTS ON THE '? 06109 WATER MAIN SHALL BE LOCATED AS FAR APART AS POSSIBLE FROM JOINTS ON THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN (STAGGERED JOINTS). 30JUN06 ALL DIP SHALL BE CLASS 50 OR HIGHER. ADEQUATE PROTECTIVE MEASURES sx¢ No. AGAINST CORROSION SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY THE PERMITTING UTILITIES C4.4 DEPARTMENT. CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL Finish grade to R/W allow 0.4' min. max. fall Fron property line to Minimum 36' Behind Back Of Curb Or Edge of Paveme 36' sidewalk Double-Sweep Te •? 30'-36' or as Directed by the City CITY OWNED HOMEOWNER OWNED AND AND MAINTAINED MAINTAINED 6' Service Lateral Main ANY VARIANCE MUST HAVE SECTION WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. C!TY OF KMX A I= 1 aNM AW ti? STREET AT RA )p rAm rr tv 0 TA wn rs poi w, 1 v e CITY OF CLEARWATER DETAIL m CLEAN13UT PLUG CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Corgx, See N13TE For Traffic Bearing Cover. Part No. 106 Or Equal m Concrete Pad 8' FEMALE AWTER Thick x 11-6' Sq. CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Company p Port No. 101 Or Equal A TWO-WAY CLEAN13UT CHARLOTTE Pipe And Foundry Port No. 448 Or Equal NOTE, Cleanout Plug Cover To Be US. Foundry 7623 Or EquaL pop y',iLL« &wer Loternl CLEANUUT DET AIL' ) MTS co ; W { 0 z w0ZQ 7130 ro ?i°? ° ZQ!4 a L1L'" _? ?DOQ 3Zz< QLOoW, dv?D J (n W N W MN Q N U aH L3 in W N 0 ,[x ? "m J 0. a m N M Q to w Ir o W? Z4 ZQ J 0 OQ Joa • x V ?Ln (n W ro WN Z x 0 L 0 Zo Wd REVMS 10 DATE 1 9/5/06 2 10/12/06 3. A ,': 31rr y ` zCo?i`y'?.l ?? oa .? -N .73 4 1 r d CL . 0 o = 1 e N 5y G.. Fa •C J U4 ?Oa _VSR CXECKEO: FCS JOB: 06109 30JUN06 C4.5 L-J 0 Z ,za DO ??eo a Z?4 DL... x o° a - ZW I QLO6 Qv?° v Q0 ¦m ?m o m ? o c m 4 dam W(3 °a a) JZ a0m W I4? on Z 0Jr4 N N EL ? NJr NI.. J 't I .a ^ZO. 0 N J ¦4 1,W n 6, 10,6- I 1 i let let I:LOOR PLAN SCALE, 1AW-P-m^ K' X17 4q ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 91006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ND DATE t 9/5/06 3 4. 4 m m m m 0 z? ?_ au rc7 6o ,x VSR circcKEm joe: 060 °: 30JUN06 All ®0 i 1 n 1,646 -04= ift 2nd FLOOR PLAN SCALE: V16".I'•0" 3rd d 4th FLOOR PLAN SCALE I/Ib".I'•0" i ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Z oo ??ao Z?4 DL J ?HW LL E?..OoQ v 3ZZ< + ooW W J J ¦ Q? 0? o? Q i Ln WD 021 JZ QOm W I4? ILZ N JEq N N (L w U m?P l7I ., J -OI .Q -OIL o ? 0 N J ND DATE t 9 /5/06 2 1 12 a i e e w 8 0 ?_ a rc9 6o zrc o a. a DRAWN: VSR CHECKED ": 0601 Q1 ` 30JUN06 SHEE ND. A12 qlz Z Wcnza 00 a0 Z?4 a ?OOa 3Zza O;w v'oEl W J v COND. UNITS a W 11 COND. UNITS ?'l • 0 10 ? Fl a COND. UNITS a a 0 d SPA ?e J op J ROOF: PLAN SCALE, ]AW.P•0- ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTM tC CITY OF CLEA.RWO, -k to ff, ?m ° ° v >mN w °am JZ Q0N W =?a aZN W mJ? ml.. J dWI ?a - Za 0 i W EL 0 ¦L6 NO DATE. t 2 0 3 S m m m m 0 0 0 d? Wz Jz a? tt7 ?O ?a W r! VSR CHEMED: ?B. 060i 30JUN06 SHW NO. A1.3 • i z T/ T/'. T/ i0 N T/ 3rd FL BLAB - a a? T/ 2nd FL SLAB T/ 2nd FL SLAB °a T/ let FL SLAB- T/ EXISTNG°' GRADE 0 REAR ELEVATION SCALE, IAW-P-0" ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOY 0 9 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMEN" CITY OF CLEARWA-CiR BARREL TILE ROOF O SAND TEM. STUCCO, PAINTED O CULTURED STONE BALUSTRADES Q WOOD TRELLIS, STANED© 41?ZQ s00 EN a Z?4 ?HW `?..poa do g 3ZZW CLpd.j dv0D v Q? m ? 0 ? p WMa Q ?QN W JZ 13 in w W.J 1 o.Z m M?N W J? EL MI, J - (9a I .Q Z 0 ? a m NQ DATE t 9/5/06 2 i 1 06 a 4 S m n 0 eg o: ti_ a? s? z0 zw C, 5 DI: VSR CMECNED: JOB: 0601 wre 30JUN06 I'HE'T N0. A2.1 FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: VI6°.I'-®• • LIGHT SAND TEXTURE STUCCO, PAINTED O HEAVY SAND TEXTURE STUCCO, PAINTED (3 FOAM MOLDING W/ STUCCO FINISH, PAINTED GARAGE REAR ELEv 3/4" W X In' D CONTROL JOINTO SCALE, I/I6°•I'•0" - MEDALIICN, STUCCO FINISH W/ PAINT(g) - STANDING SEMI METAL ROOF O RAIN GUTTER PAINTED (D -\ METAL SECT. GARAGE DOOR, GARAGE RIGHT ELEv GARAGE FRONT ELEv SCALE: VIS'd'•O" SCALE: V*'•I'•O' LIGHT SAND TEXTURE STUCCO, PAINTED O HEAVY SAND TEXTURE STUCCO, PAINTED Q9 FONT MOLDING W/ STUCCO FINISH, PAINTED 3/4"W X 1/2'D CONTROL JONTo3 CULTURED STONE BALUSTRADES(5) r- BARREL TILE ROOF HEAVY SAND TEXTIIF;r= STUCCO, PANTED(2) CONDO LEFT SIDE ELEy SCALE, I/W'•I'•0' CULTURED STONE BALUSTRADES o9 VINYL FENCE EQUIP. SCREEN ?LLLR7UGHT IRON FENCE, PANTED WHITE STUCCO OVER CMU COLUMN LEFT ENTRY GATE ELEv SCALE VY'•i'•0° OVER CMU (2 T/ PARAPET T/ RDDF 9 T/ 3rd FL SLAB - 'a e T/ 2nd FL SLAB - 0 in T/ 2nd FL SLAB - 7 T/ let FL SLAB - T/ EXISTING.- GRADE 9 CONDO RIGHT SIDE ELEV', SCALE VW'•1'-0" Q9 CULTURED STONE BALUSTRADES ® VINYL FENCE EQUIP. SCREEN i Z 00 < IUD IS i •RR0 IrD 4 VZQ4 ?rl? Q 0. 4T/ PARAPET L.. O 3 ZQ in T/ ROOF 6 Z iQ L`.0 0 wi 00 _ 14+ T/ 3rd L SLAB C a c T/ Hid FL - SLAB ¦N 0? Q ? m C3 a ° Wm13 it > in Q iam wC3 °a? JZ x4 W w9vt 0z O.iP N N V mJ? mx.. ? amx ?Q ?Za IL ° N J 111114 a, T/2nd FL - SLAB v A -T?._._.._ T/ let FL SLAB T/ EXISTING 9 GRADE LIGHT SAND TEXTURE STUCCO, PAINTED 0 HEAVY SAND TEXTURE STUCCO, PANTED O FOAM MOLDING W/ STUCCO FINISH, PAINTED 3/4'W X 1/2'D CONTROL JOINT Q3 ORIGINAL RECEIVED t,v0V 0 9 2006 PLANNING DENLAW%k- CITY OF Cr ?-L-;. 4 CULTURED STONE BALUSTRADES 90 /- BARREL TILE ROOF o5 hJ L 3 LIGHT SAID TEXTURE STUCCO, PAINTED O METAL PAN STAIRS O HEAVY SAND TEXTURE STUCCO, PANTED 03 POAM MOLDING W/ STUCCO FINISH, PAINTED 3/4" W X 1/2' D CONTROL JOINT @ REVOM NO DATE t 2 1 a 4. 4 m m z WZ acj o'. 7 L. Z? goga VSR SAND TEXT. STUCCO, PAINTED O CHEMD: WOOD TRELLIS, STAINED Joe: osoi °' 30JUN06 sNCCr No. A2.2 RIGHT ENTRY GATE ELEy SCALE IAb".I'•0" T/ P,4R,4PE T/ R00F T/ 3rd F SLa5 T/ 2nd FI SL,45 T/ 2nd Fl SL,4B T/ let FL SLA5 T/ EXISTING GRADE SCALE: 3/16"=V-011 r/ FAR,4f T/ RC T/ arc 5L4 T/G2nc 5LA T/ 2nc SLA T/ let 5LA4 T/ EXI5TI CxR,4DE • ORIGINAL • RECEIVED SCALE: 3/16 I' 0" dj z W?ZQ 700 a? `SZ<? pL??W ?oo< d? p ,,I:ZZW 3W L .o; dQ- v Q4) 0? D ? p W m p Q in Wo p?m J Z QpU1 W 24d nnMJN Ii N Z V N, r M 2 .. J !p2 .Q ?Za 0 ? W p M J ?4 NQ DATE L 9 /5 /06 2 10/1'2/06 a 4. a m m m 0 0 rc? aLj ¢rc¢7 20 w goga VSR CHECKED: Boa 0601 a'E' 30JUN06 SXEEf N0. A2.3 FRONT ELMv/4TfON FoWR7 I s4L RM4R r=Lr=\/4t 1 ON T/ PARAPET- I T/ R00F cf) c? T/ 3rd FL SLAB - i x ?r L T/ 2nd FL SLAB m ' T/ 2nd 1=L_ SLAB V mmI U' T/ let FL SLAB - / EXISTING - GRADE I 1-11, N IG;H SPA (MAX. 2'-7 NIGH DEGK-? In GLfMBING L 51=rm SLX?04TION SCALE: 3/16 P-0" ORIGINAL RECEIVED P4 R t1P4L S DE EL.EV044TI0N SCALE: 3/16 I'-m" • t 9/5/06 /06 e 0 o° d ? _ ? a? rc7 ?LL O qoqa VSR CHECKED: JO& 060, are 30JUN06 S? NO, EXISTING A2.4 GRADE ATOR q-j Z ?v-Jz Q ? moo ? Sao ` ZQ; FOoa 3:z < pLOoH a Q0 ,p 0 N ? 1 13 M m Q ?Q WO ?? Jz Q o N0 W I4? N N N aZ M U , l7I .. J ! E9 aQ ZIL 0 C IY 0 U) 04 J it O NO DATE 2 , a„206 S Cr G9 tp z U) Z< Jac a? •?RR??D VZ?LL Q ?Oo< 3ZZQ c? Oow ?v KyD Q? o? a 13 M a dam W60 ?Z aa N W i4a n W P z a. N N J N IV Jr t7I .. J ??_ .a "Za N0 ? LL o a J N ?4 FEVOONS ND DATE- t 2 1 a 11206 A S m Ko m m.. JZ aci C7 ?LL Q2J? >J DN?H, VSR CHECKED: JCB: 0601 are 30JUN06 SHM ND. A2.5 SCALE: 1/4"=V-0" ORIGINAL 0 IFCFR!Y NOV 0 92006 PLANNING DEPAkIMEN! CITY OF CLEARWATER -Alit 'I-llqlmi;ii ITT 7-7 -04 s r? r L ------------ 14 d! sr #t V a I T? I A&IM N=wv yus_rea wx P, i, ,i 1 ? s a 0 -Aw f!t S 0 0 b 97 fi w.- 4 •? - . Sir ?r'?r+'C _ , ,, ,. f, ? ? «: 't ?y+ _ sF . _.`? ? 1§.. ..t ? ?v it 41?F of { .. ? _ w t I(1????lll,= ooo? i - "tea - _ ?_• ? _ _ 0?1 - t ? c 1' tt ?N t f ? ? ?• Y '`'X? ?t a?" a4 ? d '?? fit.,, ?? ." ?. low - }? t:? "z ??,y.". ..{;yn +y.. ;? t ? •. jy- ;?FL,a'°..'y? « ?f? 7?` ";z ax?q..?`., i t Q YY 77r yx A?.aa ,;? t i. 1 Y }? 1 ? T t t r i a 41 0 0 MW I ls? *4 JA: a III ?y IMF I?tlro P , ,PI ,? ,a . II o ? o ,a, , ?? tl7 ?y t? 77 ft?? ri " TI y{ ? NM 1a .w w . P? COLOR / MATERIAL SELECTION O1 OLYMPIC PAINT #B16-1 CAPE HONEY FLOWER Condo Bldg: Field paint for top of exterior walls Garage: Field paint for top of third of exterior walls Club House: Field paint exterior walls Entry Gates: Field paint for walls Fence Columns: Trim Paint O2 OLYMPIC PAINT #B16-2 SAND TRAP Condo Bldg: Field paint for middle of exterior walls 3O OLYMPIC PAINT #B16-3 APPLE CRUNCH Condo Bldg: Field paint for bottom third of exterior walls, paint for trim next to windows, horizontal watermark moldings, trim on columns, trim at parapet, balcony walls. Garage: Field paint for bottom half of exterior walls, horizontal molding, fascia Club House: paint for fascia, balcony walls, trim on columns, paint steel stairs with matching color Entry Gates: Paint molding at top of wall Fence Columns: Field Paint ORIGINA RECEIVED 9 2006 O SHERWIN WILLIAMS #7008 ALABASTER ? Condo Bldg: paint columns and medallions ?'?TY PIpIV OF DEFARTINECLEARWATER paint horizontal trim bands and molding OF Garage: Paint columns and medallions Club House: paint columns Entry Gates: Paint medallions ?Ir 6 5O MONIERLIFETILE SPANISH "S° BRANDYWINE BLEND Club House: roof tile 6O SUPERDECK BRAND #2303 SPANISH CEDAR (WOOD STAIN) Trellis at Pool; stain for wood trellis finish. 7O FIRESTONE UNA-CLAD - TERRACOTTA SR (METAL ROOF) Garages: kynar color for standing seam metal roof rte.. {~ - 1 O CD THIN PAVERS AND COPING - CITRUS CEAM Pool Deck: thin pavers for deck area. O HADDENSTONE CULTURED STONE BALLUSTRADS - (WHITE) Condo Bldg: Balcony guard rails and parapet guard rails / screen railing Club House: Balcony guard rails O EVEREST T + G VINYL PRIVACY FENCE - (WHITE) Condo Bldg: Screen for mechanical equipment on roof (5 ft high) STANDARD ALUMINUM FENCE - BAKED ON ENAMEL WHITE Site Perimeter= 6 ft high fence between pilaster columns Retention Pond Perimeter: 6 ft high fence Pool Deck Perimeter: 64ft high fence 1 ' 12 SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS - BAKED ON ENAMEL WHITE Garages: Overhead sectional doors with lite t ' V n ~ ~ n~ ~ ~ r D~ D rn o~ovoi D ° r ~ X1 ~ ~ om om ~ ~ m m m O o~co .,C :D W ~ ~ -z O O O rn s s ~ Z ~ ~ -I D ~ G1 D ~ ITI Ul -gyp ~ W - ~ ~ < < W O vn n v ~ cn N ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (P N~ o ~ rTi rn rn N ~fTl _ ~ ~ o -o O co Oi ~l .D W OS m m C O ITI cn cn (WIi N W ~ W I w 1 w rn o ~ W m ~ ~ N N W ~ w ~ n~oz°r ~ o ~ .p ~ r W ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ r ~ ~P (n N v ~ N W Ui rn O W v' Ln ~ ~ m J = Ui v N O ~ ~~~rnZD ~ ~~D~ON Or • s ~~~a N z Z CC ` ~ O ~ VI ~ ° (n ~ O -I (T~~ Q7 A ~ :U - _ D n NN m ~'~~z D D ~ Z D Z -I Z Z D ~ ~ D ~ ~ '0 Z U1 .D L ~ c. ~ -p Z U1 ~ ~ Z m O Z O O p Z "Q z ~ D ~ ~ s z , Zoo ~ D ~ ~o{~ m ~ ~ z o z o ~ rn y ~ N. cn ~ ~ z r m ~ ~ N ~ ~ Z ® ~ ~ "m Z=~ ~ *Z m0 cawwwwww ~ ~ ~ D m ~ ® _ ~O DAm A'~D cntncnCncnCnCn m rZ r -t • r c m~ ADO ~A~ pD v~ia~ic~'na~ooo~ ~ R~1 m X N D O D ~ ~ z y z z~~ ~ ~ Z.p mv~o Uri y~ ~m ~o ~Z mZ r0~00~~ :0 ~ 3 Z ~ (7 mm n~ ~o g~, m~D~~~~ 3 D D N N Z Z O 0 P? N Z o A Z N o m 0~ 3~ 0 r~~ ~ T ~;...,~s, {s z m m m ~ 'Y y~.J 4~~ ~ D ~ ;.K~;:.,;r~ ~ D N ~ ~ ~ Z D ~ GA •{4~M~ (NQ N w0 ~ D m m o W m Z N GARAGES ~czn ~ ~ ~ rn o ~ G] ~ s;e;: D~) ~ O N yOOD .C.~ fA o ~ ~ z° ~ ~ Z Z O ITI ~ o ~ m m FAD io i ~ r~v~~w~.~~ ~ o N ~ z ~ :(1 W r ~ o ~ ~i v n~ O y D n ~ ~F~ W ~ ~ o ~ rv m Z z ~ ~ ° Z mN n O ~ N < o~ rD m ~ vo m~ ~ m ~ 0 N V D O I Z1 ~ O -a -I ° z ~ O rn ~ W v «rn ~ o m ~ ~ ~ m o m ~ - ~ rnOrn ~ < m O r O rn D m~ , o ~ D D ~ W w ~ N ~ G] N X .p y ~ I ~ Ui ~ ~ , O N o p ~ mDn~p~v m ~ Z c vOmm~mO ~ -I ~ ~ ~ ~ Z r p O ~ ~ G7 ~ m ~D ~z~rn-opz O zrn 1~j m ~ ~ v ~ rn 3~ ~DWy~~D 3 ~ o - ~ GARAC Q m < o~ GARAGES Z z ~ m ~N -I Zrn D~C~~co rn Z ~ , D -i J ~ -IN ~fnr~~ -I _ ~ rn ~ ~ _ ~ ~ y r 2 n ~ %C1 r O ` ~ . , 0 ~ 0~ mr ~ m coD ~C m C ~ ~ ~ r cn z m ~ _ r , , ~ ~ p m , . ~ n (n .a W ~ v ~l m rn , ~ ~ m , r~ ~ ~~~c~~~c~ ~ m -I n , "i ~ , D W • ~ ~ , O G1 NNW +N~ i Z O Cr}r ~ ~7 O O N m ~ - ~ ~ n ~ GJ ~ p • . D 4i r O ^ w uu~inuun ~CD`J ~ r ' - ~ O rn r, ~Zm U1 cO rr m ~ W NN~WN~'`~ NNjO] ~n O X D {+r D ~ n ~ ~ \ ~ ~ cn C ~ Rl W o . r- (n ~ O X N \ ~ Z D x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-=C r O °z o _ D~ N Z X - x x O Wn~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o D z r D CO ~ ~ \ . m o \ c ~D ~~m (n ~ ? . _ ~ ~ Nz O=/~ ~ W ~ r W o x ~ ~ o x GARAGE; o~ GARAGES ~ 70 D ~ ~ -P D x ? x - o ~ ~ o~D m - b o 00 - o 6~ ~ ~ ~7 n ? X A~ 0 c \ ~ ~ y J zo O ? ~ D \ d m ~ ~ ® r- "N Z (11 Z Z D J w ~ DZ ~ \ Q -_I Oa \ ~ O ~ O D ~ -P ~ , o~ cn ~ \ O m a r ~ z < ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~D m m o D W \ o ~ N. o /i ~ CO m m z mcn zo ~ z o ~N ~W x ~ , ~ v t~ cn O ~ ~ ~ D x ~sM C o z 0 Z~ r W t5 W N ~ , w m p ~ ~ - e / J J D T~ fT1'0 "p D n~ } u O N Z N ~D ~O ~ ZO ~ o 0 O m y ~ ~ N GARAGES GARAGES N r o ~o rnr t~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D~ x ~D 000 J ~ WO ~ X O ~O CC ~ J V 1 n-~ o-oaom~mOO x ~~c` zz I ~ D ~ ~ ITI ~ X X ~ - - r D _D_ o0 <mn~~~o~ o x -I -I I ~ c~ t ~ o mrn-~~~-oz o x x o o W ~ REVISIONS. z~Z Zvi o < , n _IO~~~ _ = x ~ N JULY 7/06 m z O ~ ITI ? N ~ ~ \ AUGUST 25/06 ~ n Z ~ N ? x Ql O N p ~ m '0 x ~ ? ? ~ ~ 'P ~ p ~ N ®RIGINAL OCTOBER 8/06 D x ~ j ~ ~N \ ~ ? , x c, p ~ ~ RECENED NOVEMBER 5/06 0 9 2000 ' DATE; r ~ - ? - - Z D ? PLANNIN~DEPAR'ffUIEN~~ MAY 25/06 CITY OF CLEARWATER Z~ ~ O N ' OZNi'1 O _ - _ \ \ D m ~ ~ \ 00 i3 ~ ~ O ELE~V,32,5 JOB # 2650 0 0 0 , ao - ~ ~ O \ 0 ~ W D W ~ N N ~W DN zJ ~ N cn W 0 DRAWN BY: MIM „P c0 ~ O (n c. cn ~ O CHECKED BY: J w 0 ~ ~ J ~ MIM/PH t11 ~ Oo D J C < O a7 N D ~ r' X _0 ~ ~ ~ 'o ~ N J m J ~ D r ~ , -v ~ w ~ _ o ~ r o ~ scALE: 1 "=10' p ncn D DX~ ~ ~ C ~ oa c~ r ~ = Z O O M ii Z ~ -I w D N O SHEET: r LS 1 OF 2 d, a, NOTE: NOTES, Z , "X" VALUE IS INDICATED AS „ 1. ALL TREE LABELS IDENTIFY THE QUANTITY AND SPECIES OF EACH PLANT. LEADER LINES IDENTIFY SPACING OF PLANT O.C ONE PLANT WITHIN A GROUPING OF SIMILAR GRAPHIC. UNDER SPECIFICATIONS IN 2. THE LOCATION OF PLANTS AS SHOWN IN THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. THE FINAL LOCATIONS TREE PLANT SUMMARY AND MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMODATE EXISTING TREES, UNFORSEEN FIELD CONDITIONS, SAFETY SETBACK ' ANT SUMMARY .AND SPECIFICATIONS ~ 2 - 2.5' SPECIFICATION SHEET. CRITERIA, TO AVOID CREATING UNSAFE SIGHT CONDITIONS, OR AS OTHERWISE DIRECTED OR APPROVED w BY THE ENGINEER AND/OR OWNER. QUANTITY CONSPICUOUS ,KEY BOTANII BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SPACING SPECIFICATION "X" 3. THE PLANT QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FLOWERS + VERIFYING QUANTITIES. 0 ~ SHRUB 4. ANY REPLACEMENT SOIL REQUIRED SHALL BE FERTILE, FRIABLE, AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS REDLINE PLANT GROWTH, FREE OF ANY PLANTS OR R00T5, STICKS, STONES LARGER THAN 1" OR ANY OTHER T Z ?°o EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. REPLACEMENT SOIL SHALL BE FREE OF PESTS AND REES + + + -I- PEST LARVAE. THE pH. SHALL BE BETWEEN 5.5 - 7.0 AT TIME OF INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND Q N E , ~ BE ROLLED AND RA~(ED TO PROVIDE UNIFORM FINAL GRADE. ~ AM ADONIDIA MERRI ',I a ADONIDIA MERRILLII Christmas Palm In Pots, as shown 45 Gql.,, 10' O.A. full head, container grown, to be W ~ ~ o 2' PROVIDE 24" MIN. SPAgNG 5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GRADE FLORIDA NO, 1 OR BETTER PURSUANT TO THE FLORIDA ground pool. installed in 2X root ball matching terra cotta pots ~ Z W p7 ~ + X -I- eerwEEN DIFFERENT PLANT DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE GRADES AND STANDARDS FOR NURSERY PLANTS. Z AR ACER RUBRUM ACER RUBRUM Maple As Shown 100 Gal. 3" Cal., 14 - 16' O.A. full, matching - ~ m ~ 'X" ----'DES' 6. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED LANDSCAPE PRACTICES 15 RS Std• ROSA SINENSIS, ROSA SINENSIS, HIBISCUS STANDARD Hibiscus Standard As Shown 45 Gal. OR B.B., Standard, 4' C.T. 8' - 10' O.A., ~ Z Z N N " „ „ IN THE AREA. X X + -.-ALL GRDUNDCO4ER AND SHRUBS 7, ALL SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS. ALL TREES full matching heads , 6 -double red fl. O Z~ ~ L` ~ o.c. TO BE TRIANGULAR SPACING. FOR ONE YEAR AFTER ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER, 2 ICS ILEX CRENATA ' 3-double pink fl. Q Q m X W ILEX CRENATA 'SKY PENCIL' Sky Pencil Holly As Shown 60 Gal„ 8' OAH, full, symmetrical ~ J Z ~ Q SEE PLANT UST FOR X" VALUE, 8. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLACED WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THEIR DEMISE AND OR REMOVAL, / " 7 LI LAGERSTROEMIA LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA Crape Myrtle As Shown 65 Gal., Multi Stem totaling 3" Cal., min. 3 Trunk, 10 a Q W W N 9. MULCH IS TO BE SPREAD, WITHIN 2 RAYS OF PLANTING, AT A UNIFORM THICKNESS OF 3 AND NOT BE , - 12' OAH, Tuskegee or red fl., full head, matching ~ ~ ~ ~ p7 PLACED DIRECTLY AGAINST PLANT STEMS OR TREE TRUNKS. NO RED OR ARTIFICALLY DYED MULCH IS 1 * ,k MG MAGNOLIA GRAN ACCEPTABLE. 5 PHOE MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA Little Gem Little Gem Magnolla~ As Shown 100 Gal., 3" Cal., 10'-12', full, symmetrical shape W W W W ~ S A 5 WI A TRAI E A D U PD' M NIX DACTYI PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA Medjool As Shown 10' Clear Wood, 17"- 18" Cal. Straight Tr. FI. Fancy, matching a 0. I N 10. LANDSCAPE CREW SHALL NUMBER NO LES TH N TH N D N Q ALIFlED SUPERVISOR TO REMAIN 1 qV QUERCUS VIRGIP ON SITE DURING INSTALLATION UNTIL INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. CREW SHALL WORK CONSECUTIVE DAYS (EXCEPT 10 QUERCUS VIRGINIANA, High Risa High Rise Live Oak As Shown 200 Gal., 14' - 16' O.A., 6' Cal, full head, matching ~ ~ ~ ~ NOTE: THE PERIMETER OF ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE WEEKENDS UNTIL INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. sR SYAGRUS ROMAI 3 SRX SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIA Queen Palm As Shown (8), 10' C.T. Some green wood, sun grown, matching Q Z ~ ~ ~ PLANTED WITH GROUNDCOVER AT THE SPACING SHOWN 11. STAKES ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM TREES WITHIN 10 MONTHS OF INSTALLATION. IN THE SUMMARY AND SPECIFICATIONS. INTERIOR PORTIONS OF GROUNDCOVER " (3), 14' C.T. Some green wood, sun grown, matching rQnn ~ 3 L~ EACH BED SHALL BE PLANTED AT APPROPRIATE SPACING U IA ~N ACCORDING TO THIS PLANT SPACING DETAIL. 15 , DEFINITIONS: AA AGAPANTHUS AI m0 N~ AGAPANTHUS AFRICANIS Lily of the Nile 24" o.c. 1 Gal., full pots, uniform ~ ~ d ~ „ „ 705 ANN ANNUALS ANNUALS Pentas Lancelota, Dwarf 12" O.C. 1 Gal., full pots, dwarf red, pink, pure, rose, lav, Q Z [G ~ ~ i. .CONTAINER GROWN PLANTS SHALL BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, WELL ROOTED PLANTS, GROWN IN A P LA C 16 LMbb LIRIOPE MUSCAF CONTAINER WITH WELL ESTABLISHED ROOT SYSTEMS REACHING SIDES OF CONTAINER AND MAINTAINING A 37 LIRIOPE MUSCARI., Big Blue Big Blue Liriope 18" OC 1 Gal., full, uniform C Q 0 W I W FIRM BALL WHEN REMOVED FROM CONTAINER. CONTAINER SHALL RE RIGID ENOUGH TO HOLD BALL SHAPE LML LANTANA MONTI LANTANA MONTEVIDENS Purple Trailing Lantana 18" OC 1 Gal., full, uniform; purple flower G J ~ z a r~ N.T.S. AND TO PROTECT ROOT MASS DURING SHIPPING AND BE SIZED ACCORDING TO ANSI 260.1 FOR KIND, TYPE 38 IV * IRIS VIRGINICA IRIS VIRGINICA **Blue Flag Iris 24" O.C. 3 Gal., 14-18", full, uniform AND SIZE OF PLANT REQUIRED. {ANSI- American National Standards Institutel. ANSI 260.1, Am .r~iran Standard for Nursery Stock. SHRUBS 2. "BALLED AND BURLAPPED" TREES SHALL BE HEALTHY, WELL ROOTED TREES, DUG WITH FIRM NATURAL 0 CAMELLIA JAPONICA Camellia 30" O.C. 7 Gal., 26" - 28" full, uniform, red and pink BALLS OF EARTH IN WHICH THEY WERE GROWN, WITH BALL SIZE NOT LESS THAN DIAMETER AND DEPTH 4 CJ CAMELLIA JAP01 RECOMMENDED BY ANSI Z60-1 FOR TYPE AND SIZE OF TREE REQUIRED.. 8 CV CODIAEUM VARIE CODIAEUM VARIEGATUM Croton 24" O.C. 3 Gal., 18" - 24" full, uniform, matching 1 GJ GARDENIA JASM GARDENIA JASMINOIDES (AUGUSTA) **Grafted Gardenia As Shown 7 Gal., 26" - 28" full, uniform, matching EL V Y STO AGE A DLING OF L NT MATER L• 5s PC PLUMBAGO CAP ° r_ PLUMBAGO CAPENSIS Plumbggo 30" O.C. 3 Gal., 14" - 18" ,full, uniform, Imperial blue 12 PSH PHILODENDRON PHILODENDRON SELLOUM "HOPE" Selloum "Hope" 30" O.C. 3 Gal., 18" - 24" full, uniform, matching oo° ° 1. IF PLANTING IS DELAYED MORE THAN SIX HOURS AFTER DELIVERY, SET PLANTS IN SHADE, PROTECT FROM 14 3" MINIMUM MULCH WEATHER AND MECHANICAL DAMAGE AND KEEP ROOTS MOIST. PM PODOCARPUS M PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLA Podocgrpus As Shown 7 Gal., 4 'full column, matching 14 PMX PODOCARPUS M 2. DO NOT DROP OR THROW PLANTS DURING UNLOADING OR AT ANY TIME DURING INSTALLATION. PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLA Podocgrpus As Shown 3 Gal., 18 - 20' full. matching 3. ANY PLANTS DROPPED OR FOUND UNACCEPTABLE SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM SITE. 70 ROSA ROSA Spp, KNOT ;OSA Spp. KNOCKOUT Knockout Ruse 30" O.C. 3 Gal., 18" - 20" full, uniform, matching _ _ 4. HANDLE BALLED AND BURLAPPED MATERIAL SO THE BALL WILL NOT BE LOOSENED OR BROKEN. 34 RS ROSA SINENSIS, - REMOVE CONTAINER IMMEDIATELY REMOVE SPLIT, BROKEN OR LOOSENED BALLED AND BURLAPPED MATERIAL FROM SITE AND 30SA SINENSIS, HIBISCUS SHRUB Hibiscus Shnab 30" OC 3 Gal., 24", full, uniform, matching - - FROM ROOTBALL - REPLACE WITH NEW MATERIAL. 40 SC SPATHIPHYLLUM (163) dbl. red fl., (7) dbl. orange fl., (7} dbl. pink fl. SPATHIPHYLLUM **Peoce Lily 24': O.C. 3 Gal., 18" - 20", full, uniform - - - SOIL MIX 5. DO NOT REMOVE CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS FROM CONTAINERS UNTIL PLANTING TIME. 6 SRE STRELITZIA REGI STRELITZIA REGINAE Bird of Paradise As Shown 3 Gpl., 20" - 24", full, matching Z ~z AS SPECIFIED 6. DO NOT LIFT OR DRAG PLANTS BY STEMS OR TRUNKS. HANDLE PLANTS BY LIFTING ROOT BALL OR CONTAINER, 4 YE YUCCA ELEPHAN YUCCA ELEPHANTIPES Soft Tipped Yucca As Shown 15 Gal, 5' O.A., min. 3 stalk, multi stalk, multi heed O 0 f EXISTING SOIL 7. DO NOT BEND, BIND OR TIE TREES OR SHRUBS IN A WAY THAT WOULD DESTROY OR DAMAGE THEIR NATURAL 1B ZF ~ ZAMIA FLORIDAN SHAPE. ZAMIA FLORIDANA Coontie 24" O.C. 3 Gal., 12" - 16" sp, uniform, full, matching 8. DO NOT DRIVE TRACTOR OVER ROOT SYSTEMS OF EXISTING TREES WHILE UNLOADING AND STORING NEW TREES OR OTHER PLANT MATERIAL. AVOID STORING NEW PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN THE DRIP LINE OF EXISTING TREES. Q 9. WHEN TRANSPORTING, ALL TREES AND OTHER PLANT MATERIAL MUST BE COVERED. VINES N.T.S. 4 ~ ACP A u. ~ W W LLAMANDA CA 2 ACY ALLAMANDA CA' ALLAMANDA CATHARTICA Allamanda Vine As Shown 3 Gql, staked, full, pink (ACP) iJ ALLAMANDA CATHARTICA Allamanda Vine As Shown and yellow (ACY) as indicated W m Z T _ _ SPECIFIC NOTES: _ 12 FP FICUS PUMILA FICUS PUMILA Creeping Ficus As Shown 3 Gal., full, ~ W 6 GS * GELSEMIUM SEI GELSEMIUM SEMPERVIRENS Caroling Jasmine As Shown 3 Gal., staked, full (n Q Z ~ _ ALL REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED LANDSCAPE 3 LS *LONICERA SEMPI LONICERA SEMPERVIRENS Coral Honeysuckle As Shown 3 Gal., staked, full i PLAN, INCLUDING ALL SPECIFIED CONDITIONS TO A 5 MSP MANDEVILLA "Sl MANDEVILLA "SUN PARASOL" Mandeviliq, Sun Pargsol As Shown 3 Gal., staked, full Z W W Z PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND 4 TG THUNBERGIA GR. INSPECTED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A 6 TJ TRACHELOSPERM fHUNBERGIA GRANDIFLORA Sky Vine As Shown 3 Gpl., staked, full rl Q O CERl1FICATE OF OCCUPANCY. IN THE EVENT 4 TJX TRACHELOSPERM iRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES Confederate Jasmine As Shown 3 Gal., staked, full J fRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES Confederate Jasmine As Shown 7 Gal., staked, full a O THERE ARE ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED FLORATAM OR BAHIA SOD (OWNER'S DECISION) AS NEEDED -FOR RETENTION POND. W Z a NO LANDSCAPE PLAN, SUCH CHANGES MUST BE FLORATAM OR E TE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AND NOTED ON THE 100% SHREDDED 100% SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH - 3" UNIFORM THICKNESS. RED OR DYED MULCH. ~ ~ ~ Q ALL TREES AND SHRUBS ARE TO BE POSITIONED PLAN PRIOR TO NOTIFlCATION FOR THE FINAL IS UNACCEPTAB IS UNACCEPTABLE- MULCH TO BE INSTALLED WITHIN 2 DAYS OF PLANTING. VERTICALLY REGARDLESS OF THE SLOPE OF THE INSPECTION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. SOIL MIX FOR A GROUND IN WHICH THEY ARE PLANTED, WATER NOTE: (PER SECT 3-1204-A) ~ 30% Screened T 501E MIX FOR ALL PLANTS, SEE NOTES AND DETAILS. O RINGS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT RIGHT ANGLES ~ TRUNK OF PALM BRACES ARE TO MEET ALL LANDSCAPING NEAR PUBLIC SIDEWALKS MUST STAKING FOR AI 30% Screened Top Soll, 44% Peat Humus & 30% Coarse Sand J STAKING FOR ALL TREES, SEE NOTES AND DETAILS- TO BE STAKED SAME DAY. (A Q ~ I- ~ TO THE TREE OR SHRUB OR IN THE POSITION WHICH CLEATS AT NOT LESS BE MAINTAINED TO ALLOW UNOBSTRUCTED 11 TERRA COTU BRACES PASSAGE OF PEDERSTRIANS AT ALL TIMES. (PER ABBREVIATIONS; 11 TERRA COTTA POTS WHERE INDICATED. ~ W WILL MOST EFFECTIVELY SERVE THE PURPOSE OF THAN 1/3 HEIGHT OF TRUNK. NO PLANT SUBS VO PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM DESIGNER AND/OR OWNER. Z W r RETAINING WATER AT THE BASE OF THE PLANT. ~ SECT.3-1204-K) B&B - BAG AND BURLAP MIN. - MINIMUM ~ LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN A MANNER C. - CALIPER O,C, - ON CENTER TREE LIMBS TREE LIMBS EXTENDING BEYOND THE SHOULDER OR CURB LINE MUST BE 14.5 FEET * NATIVE PLANTS Q ~ Q LL. W ` WHICH MINIMIZES CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE C.T. _ CLEAR TRUNK OAH _ OVER ALL HEIGHT ABOVE THE 4BOVE THE PAVEMENT. FRAGRANT FLOWERS J } ~ _ ~ PALM STAKING (PLAN VIEW) LANDSCAPING AND SINAGE AND Ul'1LI1'IES. PER FL. - FLOWER sP. SPREAD ( GAL. GALLON SPEC. - SPECIFICATION CONSPICUOUS FLOWERING r sECr 3-12o4-E) ALL PLANT D 4LL PLANT MATERIAL. TO BE FLORIDA #1 OR BETTER Z Q ~ QUEEN PALMS -FRONDS TO REMAIN PROVIDE TREE POTECTION BARRIERS FOR ALL NOTE: TREES TO BE SAVED. SHRUBS CON SHRUBS CONSTITUTE AT LEAST 50% OF REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPING. O ~ ~ Z Q CONTRACTOR SHALL JAW ASSURE PERCOLATION OF ALL PLANTING PITS ~ PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ? 5 A S BU LAP A AT ~~Uo~ W L YER R P D t2o MAINTENANCE TASKS & SCH z SUPPORT CONTACT - NO ASKS & SCHEDULE: ~ Y ~ NAILS IN TREE WOOD ~ z _ Fertilizing: Fertilize shrul W Fertilize shrubs and groundcover 3 times per year, spring, mid summer and fall. Fertilize trees 1 time per year, in spring. ~ V ~ g ~ ° Use a fertillz a (5) 2°x4"x18" `'o° '.ti° Use a fertilizer containing micro nutrients, follow instructions and apply at drip lines but not directly on underplantings. ~ W Trimmin : o t ~ v WOOD BATTONS g M n hly durln Monthly during summer and bi-monthly thereafter, or more often if needed, to keep shrugs and groundcover within the limits W O 3" MINIMUM CYPRESS MULCH PLAN VIEW of clear sighs of clear sight and to maintain a neat and healthy appearance. Trim spent flowers from Knockout Roses bi-weekly. _ ~ = 2 STEEL-BANDS STRAPPING LOCATION Shrubs shouli } Shrubs should not be trimmed "square" but rather, rounded with top area of the plant smaller than the sides to allow for ~ ~ „ TO SECURE BATTONS PROTECT TREE WITH the reatest 2 x 4 BRACE (P.T.) BLACK PLASTIC OR g the greatest number of flowers/leaves to be exposed to the sun. When the shrubs and groundcover of same plant type have SPACE THREE AT 120' TYPICAL SOIL BERM TO HOLD S RAPPING MAT grown togeth grown together, do not "square off" mass planting but rather "round off" the group as a whole. Leave a 2' space between WATER, 6 TYP T ERIAL { ) ABOVE FIRST MAIN LIMBS lant t es. p yP plant types. Yucca, Coontie and Palms are to be maintained with. full heads except where they require pruning to maintain 2" x 4' STAKE (P.T. FINISH GRADE s ace betwee THREE FEET LONG GUYING WIRES 2 STRAND P space between plant and building. REVISIONS: TWIST 12 GUAGE WIRE CLOTH FLAGGING {TYP) Prunin Trees: PLANT SO THAT ROOT g Sprang, sumrr Spring, summer and fall and as needed to remove unsightly, damaged or dead limbs or fronds. Hand prune'~suckers away JULY 7/06 BALL IS EVEN WITH GUY LINE TENSIONER from Cra e h p from Crape Myrtles and prune branches no more than 8" back of spent flowers. DO NOT TRIM ANY BRANCH OF A CRAPE MYRTLE AUGUST 25/06 . _ FINISHED GRADE SHOCK ABSORBER ~ BACK FURTHE BACK FURTHER THAN THE SIZE OF YOUR LITTLE FINGER UNLESS IT IS TO KEEP IT FROM Ct)MING INTO CONTACT WITH BUILDING OR LINES. OCTOBER 8/06 _ - WATER RING FOR COMPRESSION SPRING Shape all tre Shape all trees to natural growth characteristics with as much height and spread as practicable and remove trimmings promptly. NOVEMBER 5/06 :7:~:~ `~~f` ~ i~` - - - WATER COLLECTION BASIN 1f - .•y ' " - - SOIL BERM TO Do not hurr Do not "hurricane' trim ANY palm tree. Remove only yellowing or dead fronds. Tree cavity work is to be performed by a licensed arborist. DATE: _ ~,;~Y:.: R ~ EXISTING SOIL MULCH, 3 MIN. {TYP) HOLD WATER ' I 6" MIN {TYP) Mulchin ,.v45: .:.4L'n4 --ffl- / '4~~~~~~ ,,;,r~;~ g: Spring and F~ , ° - FINISH GRADE SOIL MIX ' o r;., -R -.v;~u,•r~.r ~r''f~• :fir r-; - YISY: 1M(C. Spring and Fall. Keep a smooth 3" uniform thickness of 100% shredded cypress mulch. Dyed mulch is not acceptable. MAY 25/06 LLl m ~7 '~7~ ILL j •,,~;~h DUCKBILL HINGE TYP Weedin Bi weekl dui Bi-weekly during summer months and monthly thereafter or more often if needed. .Never spray Round-up on windy days or JOB # - - ~ lll lll Lll -LLl '';r,.4r,: ( ) 9 Y r''~'" OR EQUAL TREE - - - ~ ~'M~~= under Crape under Crape Myrtles. Remove hand pulled weeds from site promptly. 2650 -)T(_ _ _ ~ ~ _ - ~',°:a> ARROW ANCHOR (TYP) - ~ 1 - ~ ~ - I- Disease & Pests: Ins ect all b NOTE: NOTE. P p DRAWN BY: Inspect all plants bi-weekly. Approved insecticides, fungicides, or biological controls shall be prescribed and applied by a MIM TREE PIT CONTRACTOR SHALL SOIL MIX licensed coml licensed company according to manufacturers recommendations. TREE PIT TO BE TWICE THE AS SPECIFIED SEE NOTE DIAMETER OF THE TREE BALL ASSURE PERCOLATION CHECKED BY: OF ALL PLANTING PITS 2X ~ Litter Removal: Litter is to b Litter is to be removed weekly. MIM/PH PRIOR TO INSTALLATION 1X Irrigation Testing & Adjustment: To be perforr To be performed monthly and more often if needed. SCALE: I"1 A I 1 / nT A III\ 1 r1 A \ 111 f11 A ? I TIL I /1 f11~T A 11 urn - NTS 1''HLM J I HKIIVU HIVU F'LAIV I IIVIi Ut I HIL I ORIGINAL Reproduction of this drawing in whole or in part is not RECEIVED permitted without written permission of Margaret Moore. N.T.S. -_j NOV Q 9 2006 SHEET: LS2OF2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • I, ~ r ~ . . , . r .,n. v .....ww,: r..,.,.i..e+. w a. --a A.-... na - r. v :n e.. . x . „ . ,..:.._.~m.,~-,.vaw.:~....,,w rma.. n.. ...y : n-,r,~. -r i i , 3 J 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 . I ~0 . i i ~ ~ h~ y~•q~y ~ i1J A i~ i d'f~ c~. • k ~ . i ryjJ,J' 7 ~ .~i I ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ i ~ ~ , ~ z . i h ::i . j N~~~~ ~ - iii J,, ~s~ ~~R yam{ Iy , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i . a ' ; 'V`. 4, 1 JI .rj~ ' i~j J , ,~J v -yf, , I: '.y. . • , _ _ i 4r.,., • li/.., I ! 1 Pi ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ v ~ a v~~~ ~ 0' ~ ~ ~0 ~ , ~ , , _ ~ ~a • ~ ' 1.1:• m E~ I 1 ill , ~ ii , ~ p ......,..d,.,....,_. s AN~~~R ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . 1~ . • CLUBIBATH HOUS l i ' 11,' ' , i iii , it: }I+ ih i • ~ ~I ~ , V0~ i i i i 1 i ~ i 1 ~ , , yia.'~' I .i GAMER ( ,'il f i l: l S i 1 yY ~,Y1 ~ { 1111 1l 1I,1<'•l ?,i i n,w yJ ~ iii,\'!'' i i ii 1 • + i •~`i i ' 11 ~ 1 ~ ~ Ij ' . Y V. .I i 0~ t 1 i . i{+ t i : j I i i• ill i tt t ~ , PO i. i ii 1 + it .7 ; aJ 111 is iil,i . ~ ~ 151 X 301 i i +a , i. ii, , {i pi+d' ,'i it ,i 4 ' 1 li ' ? .1 ~ . ~ k 4 ~ ~ c ~ 11 ' 1 ,[a~ f''~ t yyi ~t~y,' i ~ 1J ' , . , 1 V ~ > ,~~~-"'~M"r~Y-r.y..~» /"f[i!"7J/l4JV.~t ~ . iI ii a ~.wy ! Y ! ~ wow 1~YI ' Ii' ! :u , jai : . .•1' 1 i r ii ii 1 ii 1 . i 111 ~ is l ~ ~ t~ ~ . F , , , i. 1' GARAGES ~ ~ } 1. r` " ~,l ii i it i sii 11 i 113~ti i,~,' , 'r••,I it Ali it ~~.dy , ' ~i"il ij ~a`i[i7 _ i i iii 1 , 3 ' rj ' ' `w1~ i lilj ,~l' . ~ ~ , ' ~ ~ ~ 4.?. s, t. a i it " 'I i t i'i ' !Z:l%i TI ! 1 'i it l i ' a.. • i ~,')~%.~:'~ti.l. •1',^,.: l • I i ~ 1 ' I l ' 'i t ~;SY „0~~ `~Y','~Cr,4.itty~n'*~' A Ir 1 l •l 1 t i .a~ • l 1 ; i f i (i i ii 'iyi 'wi!~;ir.U~r:»\,~.~•:,. i:l t •t,~13 LSS 1 7 i I i' 'j 3 h• ''i , , ,V . a:...~.:Y.... ' rs6ii.: ~`:r.R~:~6~. ,r~ e?.q:, i i i , ' •1 1 , ` i ~ ~~~~~~J~~ l4 . , W . ~:r:l~.:n, 1": f 1 1 7, i i•i ' i' i .,%1, , • i } i , , : , ' iY4f ~;7'l'l" 3 ^ ' . , i ail k:~s•.,rq . i 1 '1 • . i I i .r I ..'3 ~ i i I '•s-:I': i 1 'I ' 11 ii i i Il iii i I , wl ,i. • 'i iF~ ill 1 IIj1• ~ - ~ ~ {I I li 't+ i i is ii i•I Li ' ii ~ ~ f 1 t i 1 ~ ' 1 i ill, i k • 1 i i / i ~ 1 'l , I, Ii , 1 1111 •+ii. +i i, 'i I ii 111• I ' • i3 l i , 1 > • ti • II I. 1 ii it i • ' ytyyJ~~iy {~(~1 . ' I 1 . 1~•1 li•l iii ~ i l 1 „ I 1 ! Tl4 ti~lY t ! i + .i , lii y i tl1 1, it 1, i . i. + I•• I 1 , i < ~ ~ a? . tit .iii i~ I 1 rl i 'iii ' , i, i i it k: j 1 + i i j i i 1• I i i +•i i , s 6~ ~ W : 1 ii 'l i •if i 1 , ii - ' •il l i ~ 1 t 'i i 1 : # , + 1. d . , I'f i I i,l i i t , i , 4i +i' , 1 i. i l' r • , f' . i i • N • 1 I• i I i . I ' 't i ' i i. 1 L+. : 1 1,. Il• i ( 'i it ~ I ,emu , , ` 1 "ii • I it RT HARRISON . r~ i. , 1/ E 601 NORTH F . 'i .~i'r 1 . i'i ~ I } ; l i ' ~ ,i t i ~ ll' y , , I l V 13 , 1 3 p i ill i 1 l ,i ' 1, (I n+ • , iji YI I : i t ' it ? 1i'. I i L i ii ii ' , , , , y1 f i 1 i .i: f ~ 1: . ~ ~ ii 'ii 1. 1i. '1` '111111 1il ,l .i ,,t ii l1 i 1111 ,i'i/ t 1 + it i . . l': + 1 1 i it : i} f , +ai • M ' .q i i, ,i :I S I +11'' i , ' i •l i• i +.i l i i•l i i l r t i i 'll .I ' 13 1 ii} i { Ii ' 1 ~ I • } I . ~ • i• i l+l • 11 i, • I f i i 1 li 7 ~ . v ' GAR,gGES ' ~ 1 lr i' • Iii' i' v ~ tip S•i I ,il• i. l'Ir1 • 1 I • ii. ' , Ill l • 1141 1111 i •iil 4 . "i 'i + ii { iii i 7(' i i :i ' }ll . ,tl I, , ' ~ a ' 9 ii ~ 1' l l i I ,i 1 iyi ; i 1 'i I ! 31 i1 i i, i I ~f , i i i . '•.,7 + i. i i I ~ 1 i. ~ i, 1 I I < I 1 i ' ,1 1 i/ l it 1 1: ' ~ ~i ~ • ~ ~ i i 'l , + , i ~ it 1 i~ :1 1 ~ il3 I 1i + ii•f.3{ ••1a I l• , i '`""Y' ~ it.. •yi lii i li ii if !ii ' i ll i• •i f li 1 +0 1 i 1 I i'.+i 1 lI i4 'i •11'13 t.. Yi I I i 1 s ~ ? li 1 s i i i l ' 1 ~ { i•l '1'' ' i i . , t/ 11 .i l i i , 'i l 'i l + I , ~ i. .1_. .,A,._ .q- , .I f 1 ,.-:'t' is 1 ~ , ' . ~ i ` , : ,t y L... l., i ii3 i;+... + ,i1 . 1 Idl + tJ i . I ~~jjt { ; t , i.. 4... +1+t1 11/ its ii +i I I •i` :11ji iji . {i ' 8 ' ~ , ' ~ 1 i 1 t v.'t , { i i ~ l l 5 'iii i ' . N'_... ~ i' 11 , i~~ 'V Yvp 7(t' `-~:F' e. i . ii I 3 i. l i.i +i 1 1 1 1 i i •4 , '1 - 1. 141 ~ t. ...1... I I + 1 i ii 'i'\` , ,iJ ''i„/ ( li i+', }i 1• I i. ~{i ry j l ~ . i.... , y~.f. r. V 1 ill ly iisi I, 3i 11 li 1 i,s,\ l 'I 1 f..~ Il Ali 1111' iii +?i 11111 .1' 1 1, , • • ~ _ i i t I • Ii i it 1 ' I , j 7 n . I ' ~ ; 5+~ t..... ~ li i Lj , i+ / 1 I 1 l 1 i L 11 1:+1 1 ii lii i I;h -i"~'~ + ` i ';ti i , ' , , i ' i I I + yt •f 1 1 1 f . Iii ; , i F ) : 3 f 3 1 1 • ~ I ~ ' r i ...,y iii i , •s 1 7i ii i• ,'I. I,i v~•i i, ( :i i."i i . .'ii t , t _ , ~ t"i ~ I 1 ~ +t li i l i k ' 1 ,1 i ~ • \ i i I i i . i8 i{ 1 • ii, i ' ' 1' ' WYy} ~ 4 ' G7 - 1 i+ i , . 1. , i 1 f , i•'• ~ I N i I t .1 ~ 1 t .1 1 iii. Il . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' .....r - , 'v' S'lii •it ••t i '1 ~'1 I la . , , , I fl:Wl:+w:,= ~ ~ CF` ( i 1 i~ 1 1 i 't i ii: .i ii i ,i; i 1 G il.:•.r, > ,i•I 1 1 • I.. iii iii ~ ' . 10 UNITS @ 1400 ' . • l ~ , Y 1 ~ ...t 1 l i l li It: ' ii l i' 1 i I , •1: r •1 I , f ~ 1 i' ,Il i J~'~ 1/p1 ~ i j i i• IfYi ~ I 4~ ~ ~ , { z a 11 lW , ' ~ ~ 1 '1~..r~ n lL'.. 5 n^ i,.• ~ , UNITS ~ 850 SF , I S?} 'l.. ~ i i t , . t 1 , l i I , ,l i . ~ ' ii I! Ii ~ ill , 'r. ~ ' ! F, j : 8 t . i.... + ill i i Y ' i i _ ~ i , . ~ //R r( F I .eA~ i3 . 1 • . 1 w i i i ' i , v«, i i i i . it 1 it li ii ( i + it li ~ j t i j ~i ~ ' , I• 4V,V0o S ~ i it i . µrtlry+.prw...w.gi.,iWi"'rY'i..l.n•.:..~~ >'IS_, if • 1' ws• . 1 ti I t i I: ~'i 5. 1'li 1 i ` i i 1 a i A° l~+Y'r:,..;. s i i • it i • •1 i . $y dJ 1 ' , " ~ i G~,li + , .r ~ ~ ~ .1.. • , IS 1 ~•,w~,rj~Y~--.__.~`a•,+-f~ h. ~ r ~ '~j~~;r^."T,.~~l' tv ~O MN' ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ..I ~t. , ~ ~ ;y . : : P' l • i i ~ ~ ~ i w .A 1 ..ri I ill , ~ • rR f -'.'"fret i..r i i X1'1 Ill i 'I I.,1 lii 1 'i ii 1'{i' p ~ t • . • . I • • . VI ~o/ , . li 1 1 i • I i i . I . i i Iln i l ~ , ~ , ~ • ~ • ( , i' , S? ~3 iS 1 iii i •Iil li 1 r~f : q,: i'I r i, I iii ' ~ ,f~ r.. r M r ` ~ ~ , I . ~ l ....:V i li ; l i 1'. I 1~.~,.1 • i I• ' 1i ' ~ , is , ~ 1~ ; 31•,,~~ ' It•~,`.~ i ~ t ; . ' I i I 1 I : 1 •1 ji i + : ; ii' i , i ~ 1 13 „ r{~ {'I .•N _ _ _ _ I i +j11 i I ii I ' ' :3 ' 1 ' i~ • ,F ~ .Lro•~~•«.~. ~ ,y.~r..,i..-r..?•!'~"i"~"`"`• iii l i i : i I,a , ~ ~ . W _ ? : j '.I. .Ii i i+ i ij i'i .ii ,t•113 'I• • ,i i , . ` , ii F ! v .j.... ;fii 1, l~ • 1 1 1 ' + 11 •ia „ L. .~t , 1, : l 4 , .f ' it 1 11 1 t :I • Ii 1 1 i it}~I • I' i •`1i,,~YJ 'F . _ i t ~ , d • t' A G 7 'pl i'I 1 ' i 1 . 4 •I • . 1 • ' i> . f : ~ i , i ~ ~ ~ ! ' ~ , 1 ~ I i ill t, ~ I Cis ~ Y t 1 ?.i i N " 1 I 1 ~ ~ x , . . • i , J ~ J ~ ~ , ~ I :1. i i . , e , l . : i l i ~ J • ' i ' i ~1 ' ~1 ~ ~ ~ ..L.., i. i R.... ,'I 1. . i , ~ I ' I \ ~ i il•i 1 i' i:i 1.14 i i i' 1 , 1 } 3 v,{';;,•~-~~~~, , ~ , : i , i ~ . lir it i tt i pl~ • , ' t ' , , , , : : , I ,i 1 : I i, ; 1 1 3 Iii t ..I--~ •S , 'I ' . r.,.. i.. ~ 1 1 , i 3 III ii 7 lily ~ , i • GAF 1 Y/iV /1S I ' i it li iiY '~I i1 •'i 111E ii If rl: ii , , ' GARAGES ~'N~ ~ _ O 4J ~ i/ i! t ' 4. ~~yy Y' i Z . , , . ' .n ifs . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , 1 i t l I t ii i . 1 : tii i ih i ; i I iii + , ' ~ 4 ~ .y 1. , 0 ( { t.. i 1 l +yl illy ii ,f l{i• t' 1 p~ i j~f~; • l/ , ; ..u ~ ! 1 ' . i it 1 i "~i 1 iii , i i i+ i i ri' ~g ~ ' ,J~ ~ ~...,f. p,. j..... . i 1 ' ~4. 3 ii'i } ~ ~ i4 ' l 1 it i Ll i 1' it r ' +Yi ' i i 1 ' . , i is yip l I 1. ~ I 1 ii' 1 + i 1,:+ t + I 1 i , 4j :4 W ~ '1 1 ~ 1 i jib '•1 ' V: t . ?iiy~• ~ Y 'S Gr W : ~ + ~ ~ ..~.L..... ...1..-. i i:,, t 1• •i 1 i 1 4 fl 1 .i , 3 . , ! +7 ' ~ ~ f'~ L ~ i...,,. i l ~ , i l i i I' • :i i 1 t i • i ill i( 1, i 1 ii i Ijl •i i ' t , t ' 'r • II v ; i l 1 1 • !t l II l it ~ ~ ~ ~~yNS~~~s i i '1 I ~~C i I~~III~MII~~~~r~r, fug. 6 i ~ i 'i , 1 i I , , 1, A+~.~+.Iww•~ww I , t 1 r :7Y , t 7 1 iii I 1 ::y/~ tAipr , I'f ~lJ/T~IY~ ~ , ?...-r+..l 1 Y7i i ~ Ij j ' , t • , I 1, i + I 1 ii t t , 1 l JN' i It ~t , i_. , ••1 q ~ 1 I . ii 1 3 I l' it 5 ' a `:N~. DATE • ~ ~ Y t ~ W i ' ~ ~ / rr, ~~""i~ r U iii! + it i + !ii ti! ? , Y~ , , • . , • , . Ill ! i. i• , '1 i l i • , ' RETENTION POND j , ' ~ " ~ ' . • ~ ' cn 1 i . II ~ ii , . f-- J _ ~ . . . , ~ ~ . , q , t • 1 \Mf~'~ ~ ~ , ii I ~ : ii I l li i illy. Ii 1:t i W3 1111,.. ~ i.... „ ' , i A~b~ g ..1.... I I ~ 11 +iki li f 1111 ~•~-~'t'fM , ~ ~ i 3 I i • I , : _ nnww 1 1 H , ! f 7.... ~ ' li ~ ' 1 i I j i 1 11 i r f i' p11 _J ' I. } t , it ' L Sri .1 .,ill M1i,, i•, I r ? f JII a^:; I . J ; j i, I ' , ~ `W ~ `i, i1 I ' f ~ ~ I t ~ ~ • 1`~• 1 l S li i ~j' ;GARAGES ' , . . ~ ~ ~ $ ..1... f ~ ° L i • ~ ii I • t yyJy~ • .9 l ...p., •.1 , . l 1 i 1 • 1 i' it • 1 7 I' ' i. • i ~ ' jj+~ j. ~ Y/ ~'Y9! f I ~ , i i i . 3 1 • i , i 1 ,i • ' l r,, S~ ~ lam. 3{. J} y~q' G _ ...y.. L... . i....., i.... 11 7 I • i tl i ( a i i 7~.s,Yw.'~y„a~,.~ ....A.. i : . , " I ' 1 4i I/W le, il, I I , i i ii l1 i j1, • , I~ ~ ,.ui.. I • k. l { 1 i , , r i . 1 ..b,., i, , ' it 3 Ii t i , i i ii i'i i i 1 i 1 ~ i+ i i ti i ' 3 { , F 4.~ ' • t 1 y.• .r I ~ I ~ i 1 l i iL , 1 1 ± , i'1 .i i+il 3 1 ' i , i , ' f1 r1 ~{a1 Lrl ii'' 4 •4 ' i •i , ~+i ' 1 i , •ii i i j... i , I , i i i r / N3 'i it' Fl ill till iisi i . .....1 1 li +li it it i ~uu'*"'~j ii ' i ' t it t i ~ i • i• 1 , ,•I•• t , , 1 t , , t . , i • I l ~ 1, i i 1 3 ij 1 : : ' ~ ~ j... , 1i , ..,.....,.,...,.~.,..,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,e,~ ' , 13 •1111 'l .i i , • i+ , ii I LI • . i l 1 tl I l ivy ? 3 I' l i i .y w. ~ rti li il' ~ ~ j I ~ f i ' i . , i i i . ~rs~ra~.,„ ,,.tc . . i 1 ,e < yl .',iw+;• 1 !ir,ww~,.• .I• F""p~'~_ l+i, ~ R? ^yl i i •,t`i ' i i 1 ~i 1 i F 1 , . a 1. , Y (i ':s +i 1 t ??,1 •.i1 , • . , i... I • j }i .w.. IJ "'.i il~i fsYldw?ii •:.'>~i~i'~'i'l:' • ~p ~.?++,,..S.~y)+'i l 114'1 ii• I'~ai' 'ii1`r .~he4 ~i It ,1'1 +''h s„• ( , i ',S I ,1 + I' i i t li+ •I ( ill ~ 1 ' Y 1 L i i..,,, { 11 iii 1 • i '1 • i i • .r vr' .P ?1?, •ii? eii• ~ i«.i .i•+i 7 , . yT +i ,YI•' 7i'l it, :',:r/4 ,1 ,~v J?% a • I ii t i, ih 1 iJl 1 •7 . , it 1 f~{ . ( ii;,Y fit, , 1, , ,A , „t ~ I i i t, `y~ 1.11 1, i , ~,.I 3 r ' v 1 . fitF ~N fi,~' ~ ~ I , . i l ii 1, ,I i i+: ,is• 'i 7 ,il A•; Ii .ri .:I ~i ~ P' ?iF; :i:~ ii 1 tl idJ l }lti..: i i;•g ii ~i i, i ? s;, . t''I. / ' ,i • l 9 i Iii t• 1 ''j:1 •.p: i .i VI i ,i'~i 3 ~ t 1 , I i ' ' . . „ , i. 1 i. 1 . , ii ~ 1:1 + ,111 •,la< i J• •,il i•I 1 jt t,i• '7 .1+ +i• ,1 i li V ~iir •~•i i~j•{. r.l'1,1 ~''i ~ii•. .1 i, 1 iii, 1 1 i iy'~ t ~,I3 l1 1 , 1 ' • A r'••• , i { • ! , i ' .iii ,•Ir • i+; « ~ . i,P, +i.... ~ < l+w ' ~ : .ii' '''i iivil i ` 1 ' , i : 1. i i •l, ' . . y 41~ r+ •i :'1. ,i•i fii , •li?. 5 ' 1•.i, •SO t' Y. {I 1 ,,.Y.. { 't 1 +Y•t. lli i. 1 i ' r ~ 7+~ (j ! P ` A!'a d I ' .ii '.+'i i ' 3 ' 'tl ri1 I i ~ i• i~~ ti s •n I~'•r -i 1 _ .i,~iia1 ~7j , , Y . , l• , 1, t . a .i • _ 3 i - I Ir, ll i i ~ i'~ i' i+• , 1 i+• I ~ 111'1 1 P~fi~' ,'i,. i ii.1 i . ? i•i .:11, i i)t SI 1.. ~ I .i i jr r, I!~ it i...l' .1:...i '4'~..h.n i''„x. ,~Q() . .Lt • I+I; t i } • •11•; 1•il• , + `1 Jlil: ~ + I^~.... ~ ~ I ~~III ~V I ~ '•!II , , . 1 i1i 1• Vii'' _•'a i+' I'W "fifl \ 3? Fy.~°:i".q { A+i .3 .iii . 1 ,p Y ~ yl i• j ,ilr i . i . S/, ~./~+Y }ice/ •1• li 'i ? 1' ti? .1~• ..v ~'+•,....e. ,1 ~ ~1 ` . } ' ~l,V ~II ~1 ,,i a' i''I' ..a...v,. I'..u..., i .,•:.N Yi , i' i~ ~ l i ir. .s.,w.. ~ ~i V Y i i+' ri ~ ~ ' ' i:4 .V"uJ _ .i 1 lj i • ~'I,,, iII i i• n )t5~(y~ ' ' m';~ ~ i l i i 1 / ~ 41' ~ DRAWN i 'Q3. • I ?i 1.1~ YI}i il~ : Y 1 1 i 'I it ,r•I1ii I:I l i I 1 n .f !'I~f.l ' . , ~ , ~i V "'T ~ 1 Y i I tl l ~ i I , ~ ~ y' li 7 S li, + 1' S 1 I it 'i I i i • • S • 1 ' i• n. 1N/Y/ ' • it I 1 i1 t f •i i I .a,' i 1 il., ..ii ~ _ v J ~5{ ' • , , v p ~ V ir1 ~ ' .i i + i l i i i; i'' t~~ i 1 7 i I ~ !ti+ • , , i •ii .k;, •'11:'1 , 'i / ,ir '•i~~.~. +~t.i r:+,i +1 .il ?I, .Ix,. _I' I; iy t! 1 } 'LL a 1~;: T,K.L. , , , i ,1 i r `'J.. i. ; l{,... . • • i i • i Iii , 1 , 1 • f' ~ 1~~~~~ h '3.. ,~;L•.... it ,l 1 i i. l } i iN Ill ' l ,I' ' i" I •i L ,Ll1i i% 11, J'•` ~ 1' • i 1, it I~ f i , , 1 ` , , . ~ 1 ~ ~HE~CKED i ,ir~y' ir(y t i1 ~~.",•y) t i I i 1? i i i 'i • I i i t/ ~~~I1Y~31 1 ~ :sJ ry/y~`t/ [{r~Y i i i ,i I 3 lil + Ilii ' , , fir. /~G / 1 i 1 ' I~~iW ' i 1 1 11111 i1,i1111 1y1~li lli i,,i 1 FC:S. 1 1 ~W~ ~ I 1 I 1 i r' i1 1 ii 11 t ~ , . t J +I ll { 1 1 Ill 1il i • t } , 7 ' ' • f I i It 1t i 1 I 1 I , it ~ 1 ,1 ~ , ~ . 1 ~ • ' • " y , ? isi'' f . PATE ~ a ~ ~ 3~ rl ~ 5 ~ ~ , ` , MARCH Q6, 2006 • ~ . St. • ~ . ~ JOB NO.: 06106 • y it ' M ~ 1 ' ~ill IN ~ n ~ \J ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I_ _ i i I ~ - ~ . ~ F ~ eZuw rlo t- ~ I~ ~ ~Q O U N~ I ® c„ m, O w w o 69~ ~ ~Q._ ~ ~W ~u X~LL~ z~ L ml~~~ i ~o~~ i ~ 41 ~ I 'ae ® ® ® _ . L I N r ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ~ 1 • I • - , m - - 1 ml w~ '.~O h ~g ~I ~ I 0 ~ ~ ~ I _ ~ ..a :.Y ~ ~ N , m ~ t....... ~ 1' N P / P I - _ _ ~ I f . _ l a • ' n HANGER APPUCA710N 1' llf • 1Y' A' ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ' s fA1 C_ ~ • LJ. ~ j . i. .1 ~ 1,.~ i UP ~ BEIAW : ~ j,. ~ ~ 3 6 ~4 1-10 p. II ;l 3~ 5 2- 1-10 7-- ' UP BElply _ i UP TROY, BEtAw I ~ I ~ i y 3 0 3 6 4 4-10 -9 3- I ~ (hli I CPVC PEE STRAP / RESTRAINER APPUCA710N 0 I ~ VFR7MJil PIPING SRALL BE SUPPORtED AT EACH FLOOR LEVEL I O L1 ~ KIIGIQI y / I o I I, i ~ fl~ i1 ! r i i Ir' 1 ir' I 1 . ~ it OR AT 70 FOOT INIFR/A15, WHICHEVER b LLSS. 0 r 7 . I RI rf ; 1 • t - . - ~ __.J m ~N j~'. P y', N T ,~N '~ll ~ rm t_ U ~1' -4 - _ir2- - - 4 i • ~ bl 1 1 ' _ ~ • • ~ '-8 6.8 - - m4 ~ r _ ~>H IuP snow - ~ • TRANSmON BETWEEN MATERIALS I CPVC PIPE 0 UP FRgA ~ i 0 HIX HEAD $ElF I I _ CPVC PIPE HD( HEAD SELF TAPPING SCREW 1' m , m , m I 1' 2 ~ a 1 I "o .14 ..o .14 I o-1 o-1 o ~ ~ 4 I TAPPING SCREW ~ " ~ cROaom couPUNC j T :.'P J I I o I J I I b I I ~ Snll. PIPE BIAZEWISfER• CPVC 'i I ' 1, 1. p 6 tx W ~ ~ Q7 10-8 o-8 o-8 1, 1 I ' cROaaEO coavuNC Ap4PIER CPVC - DO BLE FASTENER STRAP CPVC -SINGLE FASTENER STRAP al I 0-4 0 ~ I UNIT 5 SrAa: rrs scuE Nrs ` UNIT 5 i UNIT 1 UNIT 2 UNIT 3 ~ ~ i ,,a, ~ ~ ~ CURE TIMES WIT ONE .STEP SOLVENT CEMEP~T BLAZEMASTER® PIPE - --ter - . (MAXIMUM) TEST PRESSURE SDR 13.5 (ASTM F442) I i~~e ~ 225 psi _ - PIPE SIZF a^lbien! Temppr~fi~re Diirinn f:un Pnrhd 1 I~Sinn Aian Nn. 1 - 1-- If~ rV11Vl7tK JYAGIIV6 a inches 60'f to 12UF 40'F to 59'F ii F to 35F Densdy 0.05 A°aa 4 HD. CALC. NOMINAL SIZE MAX SPACING It--~ ~ ~i h I, x. I 1 I I~..r `-i Row ~~nlll ~ Si 3/4" 1 hr. 4 hr. _,9 hr. P ag hr, inches (mm) feet (m) I l : u ~ I Includes gPm Hose allowance 1" 1.5 hr. 4 hr. _ - - 1)E" 3 hr. ' 32 hr. iU days 3/4" (20.0) 5.5' (1.7) l 1)4" 3 hr. ~ 32 hr. - u days 1" (25.0) 6.0' (1.8) 2' 8 hr. I 48 hr. see Note 1 I (32.0) 6.5' (2.0) 2Ye" 24 hr. I 96 hr. See Note 1 I I 96 hr. See Note 1 1~/t" (40.0) 7.0' (2.1) 3' 24 hr. , 3rd & 4th FL00 0 LAN . ~ 2" (50.0) s.o' (2.4) hFLORP 3" {80.0) 10.0' (3.0) I I II,.._ I 1 i. IIt. ~ t.,,'~ _ ~ I ~ ;n,~a ~ n a, i ;`t.,p ,`t...n j.... I i II I I IL.. f -_~i ~ I__ - - DG ~.)a I' II~~ It A L r i I - System No. W-L-218 F Rdtitlgs -1 and 2 Hr (See Iten ll i T RotlnOs - 0 Hr t... n_ i ~ .I~ ~ L. ~ r<- Ir-)fl I I i - i I~ Z O - , • _ - Tt.", lt_ >r p_. ITr _?C o ~ e n i o I w " . , "1 _ ~ ~ " ~ m ~ Y z... - - - - I ~ TO SYSTEM • i o I it 'I -1 , I LN • I _ GRV'D COUPLING) _ - - - - - - ~ - _ r ~ I _ t. 1, n - I I i 11-3 . 4- ~ ! ~ .1,~ ;~'j -3 / ~ S-!.\_ - 1 • 1 ~ . . • ' - ~ ~ ~ STEEL/CPVC ADAPTER . _ , ; =11 3- 2- 1-UI ~ 7 - - ~ ~ ~ UP FAON BElA11_ - ,UP 8E1.OW , ~ ~ - I r I' 'L i1 ` ~ yy..~~~~ II ® ~ ~ ~ 3 3 I,.,~ I lr 1 I "m I ;,N ~N 1 ~;....i. ~ I. II 1' 1 TEST & DRAIN m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i, ~Q 1 1 ~ I ~ WATER FLOW I, SECTION n-a . ~ tl RIV THRU D E 1 - t--. i t-,-p. t..._..__ 110 i ~ ® m ® UP SWITCH - - w ~ it ~ ~ ~ ! w ~ 1. 11oG Araanbly~The 1 a 2 k fce-rated ~SUm .al6oad/e5d ~a0 ossanSy shat Ce cautructed of ~ _ _ ~ P I m •m ~ I .i.o 1 ~o I - - , SWING CHECK , the installs and in uK masRt speafied in the i11~Yldnat U300 a 0100 Series Nm and Porb3an Q _ ~ ~ i I I ° I I VALVE A Sb~Wa9 tll Fire R ~ ~ ~ 0"woad sfim canmt ~ I of nom 2 h 4 a MIrtSa spored 16 a OC. sled studs b be min 2-1/2 in ride ad spaced mint I I I z4 e. OC. BUTTERBALL & t;ypaum Boad~ 5/8 a $,idt, ft ode .Ate aquae a topeled ~ m gypaan ~oaa C) z ~ I I ' 1' P I e. ~ I o-e o-s I CONTROL VALVE thalaas, mnber d layers, iastala type ad steel ariaddun apecded Z o a I M'd and Pa60on Desgn. Yin dun or oPa+n9 is 3-1/2 n - I1 1• I, ~ I AMES 20008 ~ z IkM6c Sleeve Nam 3-t/z h. {a ) s~:e raL DAt6 ~ ; w l li p~ 11 I I I I (26 gage} gale sled stet and hvring a min 1-1/4 ~ lap slag bigludnd scan lagth of sbeve ~ I. I UNIT 1 I I ~ UNIT 3 I UNIT 4 I UNIT 5 (z1 ~ tc++ s~ I , I I , ~ ~,z+e ~ I 1.e+e sP UNIT 5 ~ ~ BACKFLOW m be twsh.~.aa surloxs. , 3. Ttmgh Penebmb one namell6a pqe ilslaped ~ the txeslop ~ to ~ ~l ~ I ; GRV D COUPLING on both aides or .d assem6lys The sporo beteeen pqe ad perghay or opening chat 6e ma 1/4 a - PVC/STEEL ADAPTER AS ip max tt/15 is The rdb.ilg types asl sine or naanlaBa pipes may be aced: ~ A Poyriyl gdarids (PVC) Fgle Nam 2 n den {a smda) SdeBde 4D RC pipe to um in daani W snot (pintas a supply) a celled (lino, caste a vent) PiP~9 W M I H ~ j M & t7dainoted Potyviyd pdodda (CPVC) Pipe Nam 2 a than (a smaler} SOri17 cRC ppe ra use e dosed (poxu a slgply) a vetted (dram, rosie a venU P9m9 4. Fd Yoid a Caritg Ibledab' -Sated Fa 1 M F Aat'ng, inn 5/B n. ttedaess of fl mlerid appied ' ~ ni0bn the avxis, flush ~lh both arroxs of •al. Fa 2 k F RaOng, min 1-1/4 in Hiakea oT fl ow - a ~ . . install ~ rflNn amxlla, flwh riU both saraxs a! •d. l~n GI>rsrauctaN amrus, av of V w~ l~n lNG - Fs-otaE salad 'fig the ul gassi6co0m uakig ~ TY I A RISER DETAIL PC L 2nd FLOOR PLC I - _ --~-~'-Q LOOR PLAN \D W ~ -~'-ems SCALL: N.I.S ~r~ rvus~ srslors a wao wa a ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ b ~ i i - a'il I,.:m I Ir'.>U I ti ~ i _ t ` I t_: ~ ~ ~ I j ~ FIRE SPRINKLER GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS: - j lr' j I ~ N TRUCT N OF SEVERAL YET PIPE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS TD PROTECT NEV CONDO BUILDINGS DN-SITE. ALL VDRK IS TO 1. GENERAL PROJECT SCOPE THE PROJECT INVOLVES THE CD S 10 I o ~ BE IN ACCORDANCE PITH NFPA 13, NFPA 24, THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, THEfLORIDA BUILDING CODE, AND THE LOCAL AUTHfliITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. EACH FLOOR SHALL BE ON A SEPARATE ZONE. VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE STAIRYELLS, AS INDICATED ON THE DRAYINGS. _ :,VI :,vl m I _ FlRE DEPARTIAENi FlRE DEPARTMENT" ~ ~ r'~, FLOP TEST RESULTS PROVIDED BY SPRING ENGINEERING CONNECTION CONNECTION i I LOCATIONS CORNER OF ACORN STREET B. RIVER ROAD. _ ~ DATEr 1/12/20115 ' 1 j STATIG 75 PS1 RESIDUALr 60 PSI II I II B I - FLOYr 919 GPM -~----L SPRINKLER ®T-'_. i® SPRINKLER ii RISER , o RISER 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS ARE CENTER-TO-CENTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE (UNO). I,,,~ , j 3. DESIGN PARAMETERS } r I ~ ~ TH SIGN ENSII,.JF 0. 10 GPM/SF DYER THE HYDRAULICALLY MOST REMOTE AREA, PITH AN OUTSIDE HOSE ALLOYANCE OF lOD GPM. H A. CORRIDORS, LOBBIES, S COMMON AREAS LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY YI .E ~ ~ . n S GN DE ITV OF 0.15 GPM/SF DYER THE HYDRAULICALLY MOST REMOTE AREA, PITH AN B. MECHANICAL, PARKING GARAGE, 5 RETAIL AREAS ORDINARY HAZARD (GROUP 1> OCCUPANCY PITH A DE I NS 1 1 OUTSIDE HOSE ALLOYANCE OF 250 GPM. O , 11= • • ~ - r-o' r-s • I G LIVING UNDi6SiDENTIALIGHi HAZARD OCCUPANCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA Y3,TH A DESIGN DENSITY OF 0.10 GPM/SF OVER THE NYDRAULICALLY44~CADS IN A UNbTYITH AN :„p OUTSIDE HOSE ALLOYANCE OF 100 GPM?ER NFPA 101, 3D. 3.5. 1, 2000 ED., SPRINKLER HEADS MAY BE EXCLU?ED FROM LINEN CLOSETS LESS THAN 1Z SQ. FT. 1N AREA BATHROOMS UNDER 55 SO. FT. YHICH MEET THE l--i Z :.a REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 13, SECTION 8.14, 8, L 1, MAY ALSO BE EXCLUDED FROM PROTECTION. t-i - ALL HANGERS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE PITH NFPA-13 AND SHALL COMPLY PITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SYSTEMS PRESSURIZED 100 PSI OR GREATER, THIS INCLUDES BRACING ARM-OVERS LONGER THAN le' FOR Z I A UPLIFT, BRACING END-OF-RUNS ON BRANCHLINES FOR UPLIFT, ETC. ` O , ? 1 1 1, y I ~ / I ~ o - ~i n I Y TH NFPA-13 YITH THREADED PLUGS (OR TEMPORARY DRAIN CONNECTIONS) IN PLACE OF PENDENT HEADS. AFTER ALL HEADS ARE 'CUT-BACK' TO FINISHES, A '7' ~ U 0 _ _ I I E. ROUGH-IN PIPING IS TO BE TESTED ACCORDANCE 1 T ~ n A , , , I .I I 40 I w I FINAL HYDROSTATIC TEST IS TO BE PERFORMED BY THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR, AND WITNESSED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE DRAIN KISLKS/rlrlr4U lU HL ILbIL11 IN AtAUKl1AN6L Y11N NrrA-13 - ~ Lu 3-54 za 4-to , - F. ALL UNDERGROUND YORK (MATERIAL, INSTALLATION, FLUSHING, AND TESTING) IS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA-13 AND NFPA-24. p+ Q . 0 T- Ilr I a o- L. a' (z, Ifs... ~5' at' ~ G. THIS AREA IS NOT KNOWN TO HAVE MICROBIAL INDUCED CORROSION PROBLEMS. THEREFORE, NO PREVENTATIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE SYSTEM DESIGN. r x 4. MATERIALS of W ~p o j R.; LL_ DRIVE THRU ~i • o A. ALL FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE U.L. LISTED (WHEN APPLICABLE). H GTE LEVEL AWVE I I U l >o ,m Im B. ALL,SCREWED FITTINGS ARE TO BE CLASS 125 CAST IRON OR CLASS 150 MALLEABLP IRON _ G4 H ' W m C. GROOVED FITTINGS ARE TO BE UL LISTED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATE E ITION OF NFPA 13. Qi' a 11'_g~• 10'_0• 1a'_o• 10'-0• .•-o• -t , - . - - P d D. ALL SCREWED PIPE IS TO BE SCHEDULE 40, BLACK, OR SCHEDULE 40 ALTERNASTITVE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA-13 AND ASTM A 795. USE OF THREADABLE LIGHTWALL PIPE WITH 12 SCREWED FITTINGS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTER - 'Z a' ~Y E. GROOVED PIPE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40, SCHEDULE 40 ALTERNATIVE, SCHEDULE 10, SCHEDULE 7 ( le, DYNAFLO, ETC.> IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13. F. ALL EXTERIOR EXPOSED PIPING SHALL BE GALVANIZED WITH GALVANIZED FITTINGS. it I I ~ ~ w G. LISTED CPVC PIPING 5 CPVC FITTINGS MAY BE USED IN THE LIVING UNITS IF AP7VED BY THE OWNER. Q a ' 10'-0' I I 8 ~ 5. SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH OTHER TRADES PRIOR TO PIPING fABRICAT ION OR INSTALLATION. co E P I~ P I o-s 1• PRINKLER CONTRACTOR 1S RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING AN 'AS-BUILT' SET OF PLANS, AND SUBMITTING THEM TO OWNER PRIOR TO FINAL PAYMENT. ~j E, 6 S a 1 0-4 POINT-OF-SERVICE FOR THIS SYSTEM IS THE OUTLET OSGY VALVE ON THE FIRE PROTECTION BACKFLOW PREVENTER. ALL FIRE PROTECTION UNDERGROUND DOWNSTREAM OF THE POINT [IF SERVICE SHALL BE O 7, THE W r o• UNIT 4 UNIT 5 UNIT 1 I UNIT 3 1,2+8 SF 1.646 SF UNIT 5 INSTALLED BY A LICENSED CLASS I FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR OR A CONTRACTOR HOLiING A CLASS 5 LICENSE AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL. IF THE UNDERGROUND FIRE MAINS ARE NOT INSTALLED BY THE U SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR, A COPY OF THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR. IN ADDITION, THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE FROM THE t.5+s SF 1.6" SF loll UNDERGROUND CONTRACTOR A COPY OF THE MATERIAL AND TEST CERTIFICATES FOR THE UNDERGROUND YORK. THE FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE CONNECTION TO THE UNDERGROUND APPROXIMATELY 5 FEET OUT FROM THE BUILDING WALL AT THE RISER LOCATION. S. ALL PENETRATIONS THRU RATED WALLS/FLOORS SHALL BE FIRE STOPPED/WATERPROOFED 79 MATCH THE RATING OF THE WALL/FLOOR. 9. SEE THE SITE UTILITY DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS ON THE NEW 6' FIRE. LINE LEAD-IN. 10. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION LOCATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE ' AL IRE Elf- VIAL AND INDICATED ON THE SHOP DRAWINGS. i 11. ALL PENDENT SPRINKLER HEADS IN THE LIVING UNITS AND COMMON AREAS SHALL BE 0 THE RECESSED TYPE. THE SPRINKLER CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE 6 SUBMIT COLOR SAMPLES TD THE ARCHITECT FOR W APPROVAL 1st & 2nd FLOOR d FLOOR PLAN 12. ALL HEADS IN THE GARAGE 6 PARKING GARAGE AREAS SHALL BE CORROSION RESISTANT. I ~ 13. EXPOSED HANGERS 6 HANGER RODS IN THE GARAGE'L PARKING GARAGE AREAS SHALL BE aALVANIZED OR CAD PLATED, AT A MINIMUM. 14, ALARM CONTACTS SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. INCLUDING, BUT T NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, VALVE SUPERVISORYF60VT6YBICBES. IXISTING HYDRANT N r FIRE PROTECTION WATER SUPPLY SLY ES CITY IXISONG CITY WATER MAIN ® PUBLIC ? PUBLIC + PUMP ? FIRE PUMP ? OTHER f w E 1 PUBLIC FLOW TEST: STATIC - 72 RESIDUAL - 66 FLOW -1190 190 SPRINKLER HEAD LEGEND SOURCE OF TEST: CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER UTILITIES YAM". NODE1 jrvE RMPOMM 'K' 0FW= WT tow. iNSx-ND /ESC SN mIBOL an. COINEmm g DATE OF TEST: 05-17-2006 3:48 PM TYCO LF-11 PENDENT QUICK 4.9 1/2' 1/2' 155' WHITE/REC. TY2234 • 59 TEST LOCATION: HYDRANT /16 TYCO LF-II SIDEWALL QUICK 4.2 1/2" 1/2' 155' WHITE/REC. TY1334 Q 72 FIRE PUMP DATA. N/A RATED GPM = N/A RATED PSI = N/A /A 7 FIRE SPRINKLER STORAGE TANK SIZE: N/A MISC. I. p FLOOR PLANS PERMIT NO. I CONTRACT NO. FP- APPROVAL C.A.T. M.Wile Y j'. TOTAL IDEAL DOES NN MfAIAE REOURED SPARE WADS SCALE - 3/32"=1'-0 i DATE 05/18/2006 1 I FP1 aarreD . ,I F LECENO: - - - This property lies within Flood Zone X as depicted on Flood BM Benchmark CB Concrete Block CL Centerline CM Concrete Monument ,picted on Flood Insurance North ELEV -Elevation FNO -Found IP -Iron Pie IR -Iron Rod ASP - Asphalt Rafe Map Community Panel # 12103C0106H Dated: ,5- LSD - Lond Surveyor Registration Number N~T -Nab & iob N£rD - Noil & Disk M.H. -Manhole P.R,M. -Permanent Reference Monument R/W Right Of Woy -Doted:-5- 17-05 - CONC -Concrete P.6 - Point OF Curvature P.T. -Point Of Tangent BENCHMARK: P.C.D. AURAL 'F" MAP #132 ELEV.=22,41 '(NAND) P.R.C. - Point Ol Reverse Curvature P.C.C. -Point Of Compoun0 Curve Ch. -Chord '(NA VD) R'P- ReoarorD B D ad' M WoMeasuied CR-S'Colculet ddOBke Deed Bookdius BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: N~A P.B. -Plot Book O.R. - 0l8clol Record Boak PC -Page PVMr -Pavement SECTION__.~__TOWNSHIP..,Z.~,~•_RANGE_L5~_ P,O.B. Polgt Of Bearing P.O,C• Point Of Commencement CH•8. Chord Qearingg , R.P. -Radius Polnf CLF -Chain Link Fence P.C.P. - Permanent Control Point BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE ELY R/W LINE OF Fl; NARRISON AVE., N,13'~. SON AVE., N. 13' 1,9'16 "E. (M) ' P,I. -Point of Intersection GENERAL NGTES: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1. No insNumants of record rs/fec6ng easements, rights-of-way, and/or ownersh(p were furnished, except as shown. 2. No foundations or underground Improvements located except as shown, PARCEL I, , ~ 3, If elevations are shown, such elevobons era based on N.G.V.D. 1929 MSL = 0.00' , SCALE; 1 = 20 Except Pfnellos County Where elevations are based on N.A,VO. 1988 MSL a D.oo', LOT 1, NICHOLSON & SLOANS SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP VG TO THE MAP OR PLAT 4. Daelorotion !s mods to original purchaser of the survey, It is nut trans/amb/o to THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 38, PUBLIC RECORDS BOUNDARY SURVEY additional institutions ar subsequent owners. , - 6. Surveyor has made no lnvestlgotton or independent search for easements al record, PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA• DUBLIC RECORDS OF sncumbrancas, restrictive covenants, ownership title evidence, or any other /acts r r that an accurate and current title search may disclose. PARCEL Il LOT 21 6. No voter maters located except as shown. , 7. This Survey Is prepared /or the exclusive use of those parties certified herein and LOTS 19 AND 20 G"L, BIDWELLS OAKWOOD ADDITION TO CLEARWATER !s valid !or one (1) year Irom Dota o/ Cerfiflcafion. r TO CLEARWATER, FLA, (P.B.1, PG"46) 8. This survey meats the error daaure minimum requirement of 1/10,000. ACCORDING TD THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED 1N PLAT BOOK 1, f PARCEL CONSISTS OF 2B,985J2 S0, FT. OR 0.8.1 AcRfs. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 46, ?IDA; 'Marcy ~4rc ~ BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 7 z c BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 19, G.L, BIDWELLS 0 L. BIDWELLS OAKWOOD ry. :AST R/W LINE OF FORT e • ~ e ro`g ~ry o ~ ~ ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLA., THENCE ALONG THE EAST R/W LINE 5 ,yo•.so• o rn ~ f ~ HARRISON AVENUE N.13'19 18 E. 109.27 FEEL; THENCE ALONG THE N ~ o ~ ° FND 4x4" CM E ALONG THE NORTH Z 5'cLF ~ (NO ,p) ry" BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 20, ~ L. BIDWELLS OAKWDOD ADDITION TO ADDITION TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF '4 A , ~ ° oA 7^ oaK a oAK fo" OAK ,ry = CLE4RWATER, f'1A., N.88 35 59'E. 159.1 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST COf y ~0 6 ° 88'35~59f,E X58.19 (M) 159.1 ~ ~ _ sA1D.LOr 20, THENCE ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF LOTS 20 00 ,SO yo.• 9 f4" PALM 's N o P•P• 20" CAMPHOR ~ VE OF LOTS 20 AND 19 a, ,~,s r"oA rory 9 o TREE ~0 5,04'4825"W, 105,81 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 19, ..o B" OAK cs, s uo e s'ccF OFF °.5 ~e CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, NICNOLSON ER OF LOT 19, SAID F 1, NICHOLSON & la° PALM i1 PALM ~ s" PALM SLOAN'S SUBDIVISION, THENCE ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF D 1 " 1P 6' WOOD FENCE AO~ACENT CONC OFF 2, ~ ~ IDARY LINE OF LOT 1 ° (N0 e^ PALM ti ~ I GUY•. u s S, 02'10 42"W, 62.61 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST .CORNER OF SAID LOT I rya 5 ,a NgfORbry6 THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 1 5.88'20'45"W. R OF SAID LOT 1, S. 88'20'45 "W. 175.00 • a ~ CONC ,p h ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ FEET TO THE EASTERLY R/W LINE OF FORT HARRISON AVENUE, THEM h oa age ~ 5~ ~ s _ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ' , y , ~ . DUMPSTER ~ ~ ~ •a THE EASTERLY R/W LINE OF FORT HARRISON AVENUE N.02'49 11 E. d 1 AVENUE, THENCE ALONG N.02'49' 11 "E. 62.95 's° ~ PAD ~ ucH'r o,~ f • ~ ~ ' ' ° POLE `"t. ' ,r, 'ADJACENT FEET TD THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL LYING AND BEING 1N SECTIOA e ^ I ~ ooNG LOT 29 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SING IN SECTION 8, ~ a a ° NTY, FLORIDA. ' OT 20 CONTAI G 28,485.12 SQ. FT, M,O.L. (P.B.1, PG,46) ~ '.ASa~ V pR1UE e PMT.. ' •4$6, . STORM.. e'.... :.L'••' ' . - a E' ' I.5`~ . ~ qro r'~, 1, ADJACfM Q ~ g p ry CONC OFF A 3 • b : • yro ,'.ry •k 4 12" PAC 2.0' V ' 9 0 "r0' 3 3 ,yo 0 MfrAL1'OBr,,~ ''T!., "t~ ~ " I , : (TYPICAL)„~g°i.. ~ 42" OAK •9 ~ 4 ~ry0 q~ ~ y ; , • , ~ FND 'X" CUr NE COR, LOT 24 fi i FND 5/8" IR ~ 'PARCEL ' ~2:,..: (NG r W Nw coR, tar 24 N.88'44'f0'~ 127,51'(M) 127l5'(R) f' • N.88'48'43"f. 127.55'(M) 1275'(R) 5'(R) (LS 3747) NE COR. LOT 25 "V 'ROLE. N - a MASONRY WALL ~•ry•: ••'0ti•. • ry ry~ W p AND COLUMNS h ry b Q I a ;5 , 0 ~ 4 r A N Q f e m o° Mo o• h/ ; " • • • ~ r VACUUM q~ , N r,, r ~ . . ~ ~ I SIDEWALK EAS E T TO ITY'Of • ' ti ~ I I Q a CLEARWATf , . 1, P ~S'1:tt7=J32): a o ~ ' CONC • 4 Q ~ ° , y` ~ ~ o ?o' 1MErAL~POST , ~ . , . LOT 3O m ~ O e ~ ~ 45"oAK COVERED CONC '°..•.lO•T°1'9'.' . ;.(T~;RicaE); n P N P.B. 1, 6 ~ ~ ' G4 IO `C ~ > 20" OAK ~ ~ N 4i' • , • . , CARWASN BAY. t :3 " Q a•, ha 2' TEMPORARY . ' ~•.~~'$;•:1;;..'P~:4.'6)°' ~ , ~ aW' q ,h tW' O ~ CONSTRUCTION fAS NT ~ Q„ ~ ~ . , TO CITY OF CLEARWAY s;,, , %i? ' a yv O M (O.R.7501, PGS.130-13 ,.g,.;•~a•,,• a o' ' 5'CLF ~ ;j O - ab ~ ~ - _ , . . ~ ~ 'ASP PVMT,• DRlVf. - _~i_ _ _ "c . to • 0 P.P ~ •.Q•,~..•, PLATBOUNDARY'.'~' :.•uacrruM"'~~''... ~ ' SIGN : sraTlo urluTr sox' . N''r , FND 5/8" IP (NO J) N£ COR. LOT 27 ,O.B. a o : CONC FNO 2" IP . TC ~9r ;;i ,POLE,.. \ y?F Q 8,0 (R) e ~ ' 0• • a'• 0 h d a FND N IL k DISK DETENTION ,..0~•,• . ;i~lA'••.•..• ;'~;h.,,; •',~ti? yv ,yry/ (LB D t) POND, : • ~ : ~ ~ u y h ry14 y ~ ~ N I~ n ,Sad A.a .J ~ 70.3' • VACUUM • FlRE a • , STuf1/oN•. i H ANi APPROXIMATE , , 30,1 e ^ T 3~ 4' TOP OF BANK CAS CONC ' CONC~' ~ ~ LOT 9 ~ METER N ~ ' a a P PARCEL' 1 ' ;t.• . ,N Ih , , , ~ N N P.B. 1, PG.38 ~~yy d p~^y~ yypp ~ POLE , • 12" PALM W • N ONE ME7ERSC ~D. ~ 4 n SANITARY rf.;O..l'•• !-ViJy.' ' ~ ' h M.N.S tat: 1 ~ tY• PAL IW ' h h MRERED ~ r, STORY .a " h rn END SECTION . . N 'a ASP"PVMT.'• DR1VE~9° rory' •P ,W ~ ,0 ~ ~ MASONRY fi.D' ~'i4",PALM,. f rn •O ~ a FLGw a. , . ~ CARWASH ~ ~ , ,•`'ry~°'. ~h O ~ R rfoN ucHr ~ , . > o ri POLE 6O1 vi ~ CARWASH' 0 DENC JJ' ~ ~ .yd ~ ~ 'PAY'BOOTN ' N R METER _ _ ' • ' J6.0' } FND CUT ~IpnJ, (NO) ' ' G TE , OVERHANG ' ' • (n ' : 30 64x . b ' ' y" fi'CLF ON L6, NE COR. LOT 28 , ~^0. ',~,~!7 II gym' ry5 ~q,, a° ,•1y: '"+4. .I M,. I,;; ~J~1;`•PACM•, 'i' fi.~ b 13'PAM'' o M 3 ? ' ` ro 12 PALM r! ~ h0 ~ b ~ 'a y FND X" CUT 77.5'(R) f.0 ~ q:~X .i~u ~j~} f ~dNP • ~ ui (NO n ,,..X,~y~`, ;•~/~,~r,'GT~ 11"PALM ':a 'N I~ n `R e N 9 8.8' CB J906 g Ud M ° w:, A 5ry' h aS 2' ~R) o°p o o^ ~ ~ 1' m ro I~ ° 4 r1"PALM ~ ~ ''•ASF'~;PU1ti1Tr~D1t1V~~: a_ •N ~ 0 ~ . pj ~ ~ < • , LOT 8 N I~ •N ' O vv yy yy~~ ^J I c o a a m v 6J~lYMUYa~d 7Q /LL~~ Z a .ae ° ~ W a O 'a ,Q. ,:i.' ly N3~1121dd3Q ~tJINNl~d : ; M QUEST INN #509 a ° h 7 ~1 S ~ °o ~ 160.34' M 159.1' R 159.1 '(R) FND 27P 9004 6 ~ 1~~ `I TWO STORY ~ N,89'0T21 f. O t) LOT 2 ~ =e7 (NO J) SE COR. LOT 28 MASONRY " AND FRAME REVISED, ~ I APARTMENTS 0 Y NE STOR ' a ' ; " . ° , ~ FRAME OFFICE LOCATION: 1305 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. a ° TARGET LAND SURVEYING • ° ° ° ~ APARTMENT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756-3508 IRVEYING, INC. • a NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND P,D. BOX 663 a a ~ THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA DUNEDIN, FL 34697-0663 PH:(727) 7f < 663 3 PH:(727) 784-0573 LINE LEGEND: - - _ - S, 8'27 8 75.0 M LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. CENTERLINE ~ PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED T0: I hereby certify that this survey was made under ~ FND 5/8" IR vas made under my responsible technical Standards as set forth (NO charge. andwm.eefs.,the minimum Technical Stan c BOUNDARY LINE-~ I N Sw coR. LDr f TZERAS & BIEBER ACQUISITIONS, LL C, by the Florida ~ B.oard . of Professional Land Survf anal Land Surveyors in Chapter BUILDING LINE-~ N (P,B.1, PG. 38) N 61 :G` 97,,.,Florida;Admihistrative Code, pursuant to PLAT LOT LINE ~ ~ MERCANTILE BA K Florida Statutes Je, pursuant to Section 472.027, _ _ , , . NOTE: PAPPAS TITLE CORPORATION ~ . EASEMENT LINE-a N THE IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 2 ARE SHOWN ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF _ Field SurVe,' Field Survey 8-26-06 POWER LINE ~ " ' DEPICTING THE EXISTING ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PARKING AREAS ON LOT TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~ _P-,-~-r-v- FB# FFB Pg NA WOOD FENCE ;n 2, WHICH ARE ACCESSED BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC TRAVELLING UPON LOT 1, FB# EFB w w ~ w w o NICNOLSON & SLOAN'S SU8D1VlSION, AND LOTS 19 AND 20,` G L. 81DWELLS ~ -Philip' C: Stdck . CHAIN Lr ~K FENCE * z FND 5/8° IR OAKWOOD ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLA. RLS f~3035, EB~ J(5570 Job# D (LB 3609) Tl' 7r WIRE, FEN r_ , sw COR. Lor 3 Job# 060823.02 Drawn By:_ WATERLFLOOD ZONE LINE-~ 8-28-06 Drawn By: B. MARCH BUILDING TIE~IMENSIO~~ Surve ed 6 - - - COPYRIGHT ®2004 TARGET LAND suRVEY1NG INC. DATE OF CERTIFICATION y Surveyed By: P. STOCK LEGEND; This property lies within Flood Zone X as depicted on Flood BM -Benchmark CB -Concrete Bbck CL - Centerline CM -Concrofe Monument , I .picted on Flood Insurance North ELEV - Elsvotion FND -Found IP -Iron Pis IR -Iron Rod ASP - Aspholf Rate Ma Communit Pane! • LS~Y -Land Surveyor Registrotlan Number tiff - Nall k Tab N&D - Noi! & Oisk P y # 12103C0106H Dated: ,5- _Dated: 5-17-05 M.H. -Manhole P.R.M, -Permanent Relerenca Nonumant R/W - Right Of Woy + CONC -Concrofe P,C. -Point OF Curvature P,L - Potnt of tangent ~ BENCHMARK: P,C.D, AURAL F MAP #132 ELEV =22,41'(NAVD) P.R.C. - Point Ot Reveres Curvature P,C.C -Point 0! Compound Curve Ch. -Chard '(NAVO) P.P. -Power Pole W.M. - Wofer Mofer R.R.S. -Railroad Spike RAD. - Rodtus BASE FLOOD ELEVATION: N/A R -Record D -Deed M -Measured C - Colculated D.B. -Deed Bovk P.B. -Plot Book O.R. - 0/flcivl Record Book PG -Page PVMT -Pavement SECTION__~__TOWNSHIP~Q.~LRANGE_L`,2~_ P,O.B. Point Of Beonng PO,C. Point 0/ Commenwmenf CH.B. Chord 8eonn9y BASIS OF BEARINGS: R,P. - Rodius Polnf CLF - Choin Link fence P•C,P, -Permanent Control Poinf THE E'LY R/W LINE OF FT HARRISON AVE., N, 13' 1 P.1. - PoMt of Inferoecfbn GENERAL NOTES: SON AVE., N. I3' 19'16 "E. (M) I. No Instruments of record reRecting easements, rights-of-wvy, and/or ownership wero LEGAL DESCRIPTIONI Iumished, except os shown. 2, No foundations or underground Improvements locoted except w shown. PARCEL 1, n , 3. II elevaflons are shown, such elevations are based on kG.UO. 1929 MSL = 0.00', SCALE: 1 = 2O Except Plnellos County Where elevvNons are based on NA.VA. 1988 MSL ~ ooD' • LOT 1, NICHOLSON & SEDAN'S SUBDlV1S10N, ACCORDING TO THE MAP IG TO THE MAP OR PLAT BOUNDARY SURVEY 4. DeclaroNon !s made fo odglnol purohoser of the survey. If Is not transferable to THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 38, PUBLIC RECORDS additional insfftutions or subsequent owners. IUBLIC RECORDS OF 5. Surveyor has made no Investigation or Independent sevrch Pot easements of record, PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA' encumbronces, restncfNe covanonfs, ownerehlp Nfle euldenca, or any other /acfs , , that an accurote and current b'fle search may disclose, 6, No water meters lovoted except as shown, PARCEL !I, LDT 21 7. This Survey Is prepared for the exclusive use of those parties certified heroin and LOTS 19 AND 2D G.L. BIDWELLS OAKWOOD ADDITION TO CLEARWATER TO CLEARWATER, FLA, Is valid for one (I) yeor from Data of Cerflflca(ion. , , (P.B,1, PG.46) B. Thfs survey meets the ercor closure minimum requirement a/ 1/10,000. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, F OLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 46, PARCEL CONSISTS OF 28,485.12 sQ. Fr oR o,ss ACRES. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; ~'grcy Marc BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: IDA; ~/NF y~'NF ' ? BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 19 G.L. BIDWELLS Oi . m a y"° ~ y b ,b"h , ~.L. BIDWELLS OAKWOOD e, a0 1 ~ m ~~g ~ a ~ .ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLA., THENCE ALONG THE EAST R/W LINE i y9 r .y0 ~ ~ , n ~I ~ ~ HARRISON AVENUE N,13' 19 16 E 109.27 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE Nc :AST R/W LINE OF FORT ' ALONG THE NORTH i o FND ax4" cM BOUNDARY LINE OF LDT 20, G.L. BIDWELLS OAKWODD ADDITION TO ,4. o ~ 6'CLF 13• oAK 10" OAK y" (NO W CLEARWATER FL4. N.88'35'S9 "E. 159.1 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST COR ADDITION TO a , „ s " OA 7" OAK ~ ~ s , NORTHEAST CORNER OF JE OF LOTS 20 AND 19 yg yy 88'35 59 E 158.19 (M) 159. ~ - ~ J SAID LOT 20, THENCE ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF LOTS 20 's~/ ,yo• bO 14" PALM ° P.P. 20" CAMPHOR J, ate, ro^g 7" ~ s oA BEE ,~J S,04'48'25"W, 105,81 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOl' 19, .R OF LOT 19, SAID .o B" oAK s. upL a LF OFf 0.5' ~ CORNER ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LDT 1, NICHOLSON ' 1, NICHOLSON & D 1' 1P 14" PALM 11 PALM ~ G" PALM AOJACf SEDAN'S SUBDIVISION, THENCE ALONG THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF L a (NO I CUY . ~ CONC OFF 2,6+ + a B" PALM yti I 6' W000 fENCE avcH4,R a , S.02' 10 42 W, 62.61 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT DARY LINE OF LOT 1 ? OF SAID LOT 1, I I , ' ,"/a , , :,"/s THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF LOT 1 S,88'20'45"W, S, 88'20'45 "W. 175.00 °y •y° 1 y FEET TO THE EASTERLY R/W LINE OF FORT HARRISON AVENUE, THENL y DUMPSTER y y I ' , I ~ , ' . 4 , AVENUE, THENCE ALONG f • THE EASTERLY R W LINE OF FORT HARR/SON AVENUE N 02 49 11 E 6 PAD m . ; ucHr mI " • 1 . ~ a POLE ~ , ~ . ~ • ~ ~ • 'ADJACENT FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL LYING AND BEING IN SECTION N. 02'49' 11 E 62.95 iING IN SECTION 8, v ~ I I ' doNe • LOT 9 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, ~ 4 a a 2 VTY, FLORIDA. c; ~ ' OT 20 Q,,, CONTAINING 28,485.12 SQ, FT., M:O.L. .A$P'•PVMT;'DR1VE a 'a '~sB •~••,~'.'~staRM.. .~L.,,,.,,• . 1 ..1 , ;..;'-6R~gf~f ~ .,y~ . .,A,y ADJACEN7C0 J0:8T \ • } y e . , NC' OFF Q a • r b" ~ ~ y y 4 12" PALM ?,0' • ME7A4 POST tl si '7" A ~ ; (TYPfCAL)'„i(y ~ 42" OAK "0 , I.. -e W V '1 f3.Z 0;(R, j ' FNO 1/2" IR n : ; ,I, . p ,r~ \S FND "X" CUr (O FN ' ,...--r'•,•....'_ , •PAIkCfrL•+G:. A- NE CDR, LOT 24 FND 5/8" IR '(R) (LS 3747) T'' ~ Nw CDR. LOT 24 N.88'44'f0'E 127,5i'(M) 127.5'(R) (L' I o o ~ ' ' ~•1~+H N.88'48'43"E. 12755'(M) 127.5'{R) NE J ROLEr N , - . . . • ~ NE COR. LOT 25 Q ^ e MASONRY WALL " q~' ~ ~ " W 0 - • ..yo AND COLUMNS :..~y4>~:..,. . , , 5" 5'/ " / ,1 ~ I e'' .,yo yo 00 h .'~ACf1UM' ~ a d" 47 ~ h h I ~ 0 SIDEWALK EAS T TO TY OF ' ~ .•'i ' r^ N g ^g ~ e Yl O Q v CLEARWATE 1, P •S'1.3d~=•1'J2);..'" ' o o CONC a ~ ^ A ~ . , . I~ I I . \ t>) 0 P' ~ zo' :"''.MErni POSr•~,' ~ ~ o e .0 ~ COVERED CONC ,LDT• 1.9'•' , . lrrRrcAL},: a W' ry 0 ` • ~ • CARWASN BAYS 20" oAK ( ) ry w s4j a• 2 TEMPORARY b CONSTRUCTION EAS NT ~ ~ s' aW' o ~ O ~ O' '.o; ,p a ry (L • ~ TO CITY OF CLEARWAY ; • ~ ° ~ : o . ti ~ rn ' ~ ~ ~ (O.R,7501, P~S.13D-13 ;;.~:-'em:'':' o o'. 6'C1F / M o . • 0 `l `l 0 q1 " P.P O ~ e' PLAT 80UNDAkY . . • ~ ' ' ..I~000M" ~ ` . URLI)Y BOX P FND 5/8" IP - SIGN ; srArio (NO II`) NE COR. LOT 27 175'(R) GtF-pN 1.3' r a CONC ~ FND 2 /P d 8.0 (R) t „ ' .,P. dLf; /yF 7 ~/'vF . a FNDNIL&DSK d~•.•r " (LB o t) DETENTION ^ 0e':' b • y~, ~ ' yv ~ POND ' .g, i I^ . FIRE J " SrATfON•. h H ANr APPROXIMATE JD, 1' < , • . a ~'j a' TOP OF BANK CAS ~M coNC '~:con!c' ~ cp LOT 9 Ih METER b C PARCEL ' '1 N ~ ~ ~ >L0. . '~~Hr' ~ N (P,8.1, PG.38) h T. 1' . . ~ ONE METERSC d ••'•1•POLE~;• O12"PALM W O. ~ ~ ~ SANITARY R(~ d ^ p~ w ~ h MITERED M,H.S •~el,'j," PG;38) . ~ PAL Y1 ~ END SECTION ~ ~ STORY ~ " ' ~ • N a '4 . • ASP' PVMT' DRIVE', ' ~ ` ro"y ~ O I14 h O ,O W ~ ,0 ~ ~ ~ MASONRY 6.D' , ~ ~'T4°'PALM O to^' ~~A FLOW CARWASH ~ ,..i...••;..;,•,.;`';"~~;. t~ y ° h DEVIC ION POLE ~ , , Iy 601 e ~ ::~.CARWASN~ O ' # ~ ~ PAr eoorH • , ' T R MErfR . ~.;7f.8'. _ , `V FND 'X' CUT , O .GRATE OVERHANG . (/j ~ •.,10.64''•. y.': ..'•y 6CLFON 1. ' NE CO R, R. LOT 28 MI a '`'S ~ ~ ~ 12 PALM• y' 1J PAM ~ ~ ~ - a ti . ro ~ a 'a FND X" cur 17,5 ~ I~ n _ (R) LO 1•' ~+s~~J s ~ Et9N4 . of (NO il) iv 8.B' ',y.~J!'Yli,'1 V'/,~1;LT' .j''.~'';,., LM f1",PALM ,a A aRIGI~L •N •N R ) :`;°':'1sg'~.,..~ , ~:1c..eA~. ° "DECEIVED f i" PALM ~ ; `;9.Sp;;PUti11;"DR(YE'' s L.. ~ C ~ . ; • N liq W 0 n 20Q6 °6 ~ y0~ I' ~ ,y5 h W • LOT 8 _ r W g'. ~ ~ .+~t,,;VG L>cPARiMENT ea. (P.B.1, PG,38) ~.I~' ~:,LcARW/-1TER a o a n .N a N N •N N I ~ a ~ a , , , a a 2 O a a u ss w ~ I~ QUEST !NN 509 a a . a ! ~ ~ ' °o . ' R LOT 2 TWO STORY N•89'0T21'E 180.34_(MJ 159 i ( ) 159.1'(R) FWD 21P -4 (NO X) MASONRY SE COR. LOT 28 AND FRAME REVISED: ~ APARTMENTS ONE STORY ° a • ,a a a Q , . a . 'FRAME OFFICE LOCATION' 13D5 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE. _ TARGET LAND SURVEYING RVEYI NG, INC. APARTMENT CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 3508 . ° NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND P.O, BOX 663 e . ' ° THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA DUNEDIN, FL 34697-0663 PH: 727 78' 663 PH(727) 784-0573784-0573 LINE LEGEND: - a - - ' s, s'27 s W 75,o M 1 LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, CENTERLINE I hereby' cer i t this surve wos made under 4 ~ FNDS/e^rR PREPARED FOR AND CERTIFIED T0: ~~~k+ 7~ y Ys made under my responsible BOUNDARY LINES (NO charge t4~' e ihQ* minimum Technical Standar ~chnicol Standards as set forth ial Land Surveyors in Chapter N sw coR. Lor 1 A ION b ; th . BUILDING LINE PB.1 Pc. JB TZER S & BIEBER ACOUISTI S, L,L,C, y , ~ ~Q~tcl?l, ' 8 d~ Professional Land Surve~ ~ ( ) 61; ~1 Fk'i ' ' d i 'sfrative Code ursuant to MERCANTILE BANK ~ N~CA , , ~ P e, pursuant to Section 472.027, PLAT LOT LINES _ ~ OTE' Flor- a to ~s :9~. _ N PAPPAS TITLE CORPORATION ~ ~ ° EASEMENT LINES ~ N THE IMPROVEMENTS ON LOT 2 ARE SHOWN ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF • G . n - Field Survey POWER LINE a " ' DEPICTING THE EXISTING ASPHALT AND CONCRETE PARKING AREAS ON LOT TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~ c 3 -P~-p ~-P-P- Field Survey 8-26-06 W000 FENCE-,-a w w h 2, WHICH ARE ACCESSED 8Y VEHICLE TRAFFIC TRAVELLING UPON LOT 1, ~ ~ FB# EFB FB# EFB Pg NA CHAIN LINK FENCE a FND 5 8" IR NICHOLSON & SLOAN S SUBDIVISION, AND LOTS 19 AND 20, C,L. BIDWELLS ;'~h'iljp 5~p'~~gk::' ¢ - * "a _ (LB Jsos) OAKWOOD ADDITION TO CLEARWATER, FLA. RN.S°0 3,0~' Job# 06 WIRE FEN E t~+T~i~~: >1`~ f Job# 060823.02 v sw CDR. Lor J s `o ~ Drawn B : E WATERLFLOOD ZONE UNE~ f dot ~ ~ y Drawn By: B. MARCH BUILDING TIE~IMENSIO~~ Surveyed By: P. STOCK - - - ! COPYRIGHT ®2004 TARGET LAND SURVEYING INC, DATE' OF G'ER~4'fIG TION Surveyed By