The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-09098CDC ?a ao ao?s ORIGINAL FLDl'0&i005m0907o 400 JONES ST Date Received: 09/30/2005 HARRISON VILLAGE RETAIL II ZONING DISTRICT: D RECEIVED LAND USE: CBD Nnu n 8 2m RMNING DEPARTMENT CR' OF CLEARWARR ATLAS PAGE: 277B PLANNER OF RECORD: R -T CLWCoverSheet t ` Planning ent 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 o Clearwater Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 51 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: nJ?{n?tif5?i ith a complete NOTE: a total of 15 sets of this application and all supporting documentation is required to b?b?`itlt?d,n'tlh Level Two Flexible K Development Application. PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 02/14/05) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: t-^`/ 1N l64.E ?J Cp?.-LLy MAILING ADDRESS: ti ''((c/t/Ir?y h?RAFT4?N C. WrIIrie-OA-7/?Jy/5W PHONE NUMBER: 'C_V WW FAX NUMBER: (0 OZ CELL NUMBER: 7,23, 11 EMAILIOM4 /V O_X??_'_COm PROPERTY OWNER(S): (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed -.provide orig4al signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: If 1? omw GuveS MAILING ADDRESS: yf? N. Tngr tT !?Olw_C,L.EA'II12Wri MV Jan 32i714F6 PHONE NUMBER: 0020 FAX NUMBER: 44!+k GbOZ CELL NUMBER: ?Oti /II E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE (if59 d please note the ocAon of this Vument in the submitta?N?L=U V LLM U ig, ob 220,?O f?!f NOV 0 8 2005 (acres, square feet) --J I PLANNING DEPART T HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITLITf0FI "Fi HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? i IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? / YES NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: Uillw" Page 1 of 2 0 I PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENITY TO BE PROVIDED (attach photographs, drawings, etc, as applicable): DIC1NJ ?- C. SIGNATURE: I, the ersig d, acknowledge that all representations made in thi application ar true and accurate to the best of my knowledge a ze Cit representatives to visit and photograph the r ribe in this application. o! ner or re tative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PIN5Ut!X9"""" Sworn to and subscribed before-'*me,.thisF day of Y1 A. 20 t ... r by (_°tYlr9l 4l fy 'is scy[}all y"+how6 as d - ' as identifica ion. My commission expires: EWNJW24, Camnllw111 M h39 Nov p 8 2005 pL,ANMNG WArRTA ERNT CITY OF CLEARN S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application.doc Page 2 of 2 T r i, g 1 e t`? __xLL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC . ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL APPLICATION NEW COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDO DEVELOPMENT AT 302, 3041 308, 312, 314, 4001 404 AND 303, 309 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE; 400, 410 30NES STREET AND 410 N. FORT HARRISON, DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER For Submission to the CDB, revised to comply with DRC comments of 3 November, 2005. Provide a complete description of the proposed amenity to be provided. Summary Please see the attached Narrative (Flexible Development Application) for a complete description of the project. Excerpted here are the specific descriptions of the amenities to be provided In exchange for this allowance from the Density Pool, the developer proposes extensive provision of Streetscaping to meet City standards. The total value of the complete Streetscape package for the previous proposal approached $2 million, and in this latest version has topped $2.6 million. The Applicant's contribution to the Density Pool as outlined below far exceeds the previously approved contribution, due to the increase in quantity and quality of streetscape provided. More specific data is included below. Major contributions to Streetscape. Please see the attached document and drawings which detail the contributions to Streetscape. It is anticipated at this stage that the building will have covered arcades partially along the retail/commercial frontage of Fort Harrison and Osceola, and two arcades traversing the block. The sidewalks and benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks and more around the site will be brought up to the high standards of the Clearwater Streetscape, with lush landscaping. Special attention is paid in this proposal to the creation of a "mini-park" at the bottom of Georgia Street, an addition specific to this (September 2005) proposal. The landscaping proposal provides further details. At the Fort Harrison corners of Jones and Georgia, attractive working clocktowers will be built to landmark the site along the Fort Harrison corridor, which forms the entrance and gateway to Downtown Clearwater. PROPOSAL OF AMENITIES to be provided in exchange for extra units from Density Pool Contributions to Streetscape These items are noted below for an indication of the quality of the Streetscaping that is envisaged. Please see Streetscape drawings for further data. Specifications are taken from City of -Clearwater Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan, January 27th, 2003. We acknowledge this document is subject to change. For purposes of clarity, we used the 'Commercial A' and 'B' Streetscaping standards as our baseline. It was felt that the 'Downtown Corridor' grade of streetscaping was inapplicable in that it called for extensive provision of medians, crosswalks and work in the Right of Way, beyond the curb line. We will be providing extensive streetscaping in the areas behind the curb line and they will generally provide a level above that of Commercial A and B and equivalent to the Downtown Corridor standards. There will be a transit shelter, newspaper racks, bollards, and signage (indicating that this site is in the Old Bay neighborhood) and other items called for in the Downtown corridor standards but not in the Commercial A and B. The contributions would comprise, generally New road (re-aligned Osceola) Osceola will be widened to bring it up to standard and converted to two-way traffic flow In addition, remedial resurfacing to Jones and Georgia as needed. ????nI?J?n /??? New curb and curb cuts as needed `}?If Pavers and sidewalk to match Streetscape specification on each street as noted below TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ???? 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 ?41f ?9 08 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCO7TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM OI.ANNING DEPAY OF 7 r ITY OF CLEARNER 0",? / • Trl gLC1e ^? DEVEL OFMENT COMPANY, L ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Street lights Bollards Signage Benches Trash Cans Bicycle racks Newspaper racks (if required) Landscape fences on ground level planters Planting Quality Hill, Hancock post or equal Hancock by Spring City or equal To conform to City of Clearwater Wayfinding plan Scarborough with center arm by Landscape Forms or equal Scarborough by Landscape Forms or equal Gramercy by Madrax or as required Spencer or equal Steel Bar by A & T Ironworks or equal Medjool Palms, Crape Myrtle The palms on Fort Harrison would be planted not along the right-of-way but instead between the site boundary and the building, as the sidewalk is not very wide on this block and there is more space towards the buildings, which have been expressly set back to accommodate lush landscaping. Along Fort Harrison COMMERCIAL A Equivalent Streetscape will match that proposed in City document with regard to all items behind (and including) curb. We will not differentiate between the treatment given to the area between the building and the site boundary and the area from the site boundary to the curb. Along Jones COMMERCIAL A Equivalent Same as for Fort Harrison, except trees at greater spacing, say 50', to suit layout of buildings. Palms would be used predominantly on the Fort Harrison end of Jones, changing to predominantly oaks at the Osceola end, to ease the transition into the oaks on Osceola. Pavers, streetlights to suit. Along re-aligned Osceola COMMERCIAL B Equivalent Palms at corners and trees elsewhere to match existing live oaks. Paving as above but fewer benches, signage etc. Along Georgia COMMERCIAL B Equivalent Palms would be used predominantly on the Fort Harrison end changing to predominantly oaks at the Osceola end, to ease the transition into the oaks on Osceola. Paving as above but much less of benches, signage etc. If Fort Harrison is 100%, and Jones 80%, this street is 80% at the retail, 60% at the residential. Previous submittals concerned themselves only with the southern side of Georgia. This application will address the northern side of Georgia below Osceola and especially the treatment of the western end of Georgia and the creation of a "mini-park" where Georgia Street meets the waterway. Cross Walks Two pedestrian crosswalks cross the re-aligned Osceola from Harrison Village to Island View. Parking As noted above, the Applicant wishes to dedicate the balance of 91 spaces where they are needed most. Initially, about 30 spaces will be reserved for guests, with the balance (about 60) given over to casual public parking. This allocation may vary, depending on need. More spaces may be given over to guests, residents, or public parking for users of the retail stores, in which case these "floating" spaces will be allocated for that use. The applicant further proposes make to provision for on-street parking along the west side of Fort Harrison between Jones and Georgia. On-street parking is also proposed on both sides of the newly re-aligned and widened Osceola. Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape plans. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. Clock towers Two individually designed clock towers anchor the north and south corners of the site, on Fort Harrison are an integral part of the design. The will each have purpose-made clocks on the street faces, and are in fact the sig ECIVED the development. We propose these be counted as part of the streetscape contribution. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 ?V O 2??5 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM N N 2 OF 7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 11 A 1 . a??I??D I G I ?! }/VV.?? x? Tri` 1e O ? -'' DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC m NOV 0 8 2005 Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PUNNING DEPARTMENT Fountains (Public Art contribution) CITY OF CLEARWATER A purpose-made fountain will be located mid-block on Fort Harrison, and another two within the arcades which are accessible to the public. There will also be a fountain mid-block on the Island View side of Osceola, and one each at the two entrances to the towers. They will all be site-specific, individually tailored to their locations. At present we anticipate using glass sculptures as an integral part of the fountains, purpose-made by a nationally known local glass sculptor. Transit Shelter There is an existing bus stop on Fort Harrison. If it is to be replaced, it will be done to the design shown in the Wayfinding manual. Application will be made to PSTA to move it to the north, onto other property owned by Triangle. Maintenance of items in Right-of Way To be agreed. FDOT Permit Preliminary meetings have been held with Florida Department of Transportation, and their approval, which is essentially simply for closure of several curb cuts, be required only prior to issuance of Building Permits. We anticipate that the transfer of Alt 19 back to the City will occur during the Harrison Village construction period. Any work done within the Right of Way on Fort Harrison would be done after it has been transferred back to the City, making FDOT approval superfluous. Additional items supplied concurrent with present Application In addition to the extra parking described above, the Applicant proposes to add additional and upgraded Streetscape to the north side of Georgia between the relocated Osceola and the water (some 340 feet). This would be installed to City specifications on the right-of-way and with the agreement of the neighbors to the north in 500 N Osceola. More intensive landscaping and streetscaping and hardscaping would be performed to the terminal portion of Georgia Street, where it meets the water. This is an area about 60' in length across the end of the Right-of-way . The present condition of this west end of Georgia Street is an unkempt jungle, inaccessible and potentially dangerous. This last portion of the street at present does not exist as a street. The design for this area would include at least two sets of benches, bike racks and possibly a shade structure, along with lush landscaping, winding paths and seating areas. It would obviously be fully accessible to the public and would in fact be a kind of "mini-park" where anyone could enjoy the sunset. Trash cans would also be provided and signs discouraging occupancy by vagrants. Benches and trash cans and any other street furniture would follow the recommendations and specifications included in the Wayfinding requirements. This feature would be built in the public Right of Way, so would be designed, permitted and constructed in very close coordination with the relevant departments at the City, and to the City standards and specifications. Additionally, the landside retention wall on the west of the Island View site will not be terminated at the Georgia Street right-of-way but will rather be continued across the base of Georgia Street to meet the existing seawall at 500 N Osceola, subject to requirements of the City and engineering M. ' specifications. This will provide an additional layer of Y security and safety. r q The portion of Georgia Street from where it presently ends (see left) to the mini-park mentioned above will be sodded with an appropriate grass, and the subsoil reinforced to allow the passage of emergency vehicles on a surface that is green and attractive, and is not asphalt. Trees growing in the RoW will be removed and replaced with more appropriate foliage at the sides of the road. The t t ? _ l ttt tGae l1?VdL1QZ IL - view-corridor to the water will be restored. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO)(0TRIAN BLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 3 OF7 1 GII?AL g ?`? DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Quantities Associated with Streetscape in Approved Proposal Osceola Avenue Item Total ROW. Material Quantity Unit cost cost Pedestrian Light 23 ea. $4,800 $110,400 Bench 4 ea. $1,700 $6,800 Curb & Gutter 6" 1340 If $17 $22,110 Street Paving 21800 sf $5 $109,000 Walkw/Paver Banding 6425 sy $12 $77,100,/ Crosswalk Paver 80 sy $90 $7,200v Trash Receptacle 2 ea. $950 $1,900,/ Underground Site Utilities 1 ea. $50,000 $50,000 Demolition 1 ea. $25,000 $25,000 Directional Signage 1 ea. $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions, 0 & P $61,577 $61,577 Architectural/Engineering Fees $28,736 $28,736 Subtotal $175,344 Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 2447 sf $12 $29,364,j Unit Pavers 6160 sf $12 $73,920 Scored Concrete 2500 sf $12 $30,000 Fountain W/Artwork 5 ea $25,000 $125,000,/ Live Oak 16 ea $2,600 $41,600 , n ?f (? Medjool Palm 11 ea $6,000 $66,000 ?? ??1,1 f%J E Planting Areas 9363 sf $5 $46,815 J ???JJJ Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500/ NOV 0 8 2005 Fence Bench 0 4 If ea. $14 $1,700 $0 $6,800 J Bike Rack 4 ea $640 $2,560 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Trash Receptacle 4 ea $950 $3,800 CITY OF CLEARWATER General Conditions 0. & P. $64,404 $64,404 Architectural/Engineering Fees $30,055 $30,055 Subtotal $523,818 Total $699,162 Jones Street ROW. Pedestrian Light 2 ea $4,800 $9,600,/ Curb & Gutter 6" 125 If $17 $2,063 Street Paving 1600 sf $5 $8,000 Walk W/Paver Banding 675 sf $12 $8,100 Crosswalk Paver 36 sy $90 $3,240 J Bollards 3 ea $1,470 $4,410 Trash Receptacle 1 ea $950 $950 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Demolition 1 ea $15,000 $15,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions 0. & P. $8,604 $8,604 Architectural/Engineering Fees $4,015 $4,015 Subtotal $69,982 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC CLEARWATER FL 33755 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE U ?U , , TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(O )TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 4 OF 7 i rDE?LOPMENTCOMVANY,LLCI e ter 71 ORIGIN Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwa Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 650 sf $12 $7,800- Live Oak 2 ea $2,600 $5,200/ Planter/Landscape 72 sf $30 $2,160" Planting Areas 660 sf $5 $3,300/ Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500` Fence 105 If $14 $1,418 Trash Receptacle 3 ea $950 $2,850,/ General Conditions O. & P. $3,934 $3,934 Architectural/Engineering Fees $1,836 $1,836 Subtotal $31,998 Total $101,980 Georgia Street ROW. Pedestrian Light 9 ea $4,800 $43,2001 Curb & Gutter 6" 735 If $17 $12,128 Walk W/Paver Banding 1300 sf $12 $15,600 J Street Paving 11200 sf $5 $56,000 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $25,000 $25,000 Demolition, and Grading 1 ea $25,000 $25,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,0001 Bollards 8 ea $1,470 $11,760 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 Bench 2 ea. $1,700 $3,400./ General Conditions O. & P. $29,248 $29,248 Architectural/Engineering Fees $13,649 $13,649 Subtotal $237,885 Gti) i nv Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 1425 sf $12 $17,100 Medjool Palm 2 ea $6,000 $12,000 Live Oak 11 ea $2,600 $28,600 1VED RECE Planter/Landscape 128 sf $30 $3,840 Pl anting Areas 8740 sf $5 $43,700 8 ???5 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Nov Q Fence 280 If $135 $37,800 TMENT Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 WING DEPAR pg General Conditions O. & P. $22,266 $22,266 , cam/ RWATEP cm y C Architectural/Engineering Fees $10,391 Subtotal $10,391 $181,097 I I ?? Total $418,982 l?`?,`1KD North Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. Pedestrian Light 12 ea $4,800 $57,600 Bench 5 ea $1,700 $8,500 Curb & Gutter 6" 592 If $17 $9,768 Sidewalk w/ Paver 3462 sf $12 $41,544 i Transit Shelter 1 ea $10,000 $10,000,/ Bollards 18 ea $1,470 $26,460 Fountain W/Artwork 1 ea $50,000 $50,0001 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 5OF7 Tr1 g I e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Trash Receptacle 5 ea $950 $4,750 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $22,000 $22,000 ORIGINAL Demolition 1 ea $30,000 $30,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000/ General Conditions 0. & P. $39,243 $39,243 Architectural/Engineering Fees $18,314 $18,314 Subtotal $319,179 I13,3k`? Public/Private Scored Concrete 3280 sf $12 $39,360,/ Fountain W/Artwork 2 ea $50,000 $100,000/ Medjool Palm 12 ea $6,000 $72,000-/ Planter/Landscape 248 sf $30 $7,440 Planting Areas 5014 sf $5 $25,070 Irrigation 1 ea $5,000 $5,000-/ RECEI VED Clock 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Fence 420 If $22 $9,240 Bike Rack 2 ea $640 $1,280 ? NOV 0 8 2005 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 General Conditions 0. & P. $54,194 $54,194 PLMNING DEPARTMENT Architectural/Engineering Fees $25,290 $25,290 52vtiv CI11(OI= CIEARWATER Subtotal 3 $440,774 Total $759,953 j Site Amenities Totals Osceola Avenue ROW, $175,344 Public/ Private $523,818 )ones Street ROW. $69,982 Public/ Private $31,998 Georgia Street ROW. $237,885 Public/ Private $181,097 North Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. $319,179 Public/ Private $440,774 Sub-Totals ROW. $802,390 Public/ Private $1,177,686 Total $1,980,076 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 6OF7 T , vEL07MFNT COMPANY, LLCI e ORIGINAL,., Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Additional Quantities Associated with Present Proposal The following quantities and estimated costs are associated with the increased scope of work for Site Amenities associated with the present Proposal, and are in addition to those costs associated with the already approved proposal. Additional Streetscaping to Georgia Street ROW Pedestrian Light 5 ea $4,800 $24,000 Bench 4 ea $1,700 $6,800 Curb & Gutter 6" 735 If $17 $12,495 Sidewalk w/Paver 250 sf $12 $3,000 Shelter 1 ea $10,000 $10,000 Bollards 12 ea $1,470 $17,640 Trash Receptacle 4 ea $950 $3,800 Underground Site Utilities 0 ea $22,000 $0 Clearing and grubbing 1 ea $20,000 $20,000 Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 Scored Concrete 400 sf $12 $4,800 Medjool Palm 2 ea $6,000 $12,000 Landscape 1440 sf $30 $43,200 Planting Areas (N side) 1800 sf $5 $9,000 Irrigation 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Clock 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Retaining wall 60 If $250 $15,000 Bike Rack 2ea $640 $1,280 General Conditions O. & P. Ills $18,583 $18,583 Architectural/Engineering Fees 1 Is $8,672 $8,672 Total $316,270 Jones Street Relocate overhead power lines 1 IS $250,000 $250,000 to underground General Conditions O. & P. l is $37,500 $37,500 Architectural/Engineering Fees l is $17,500 $17,500 Subtotal $305,000 Thus it can be seen that the total cost of the site amenities provided totals over $2,6 million. I 'RECENED NOV 0 $ 2005 pLpNNI14GDEPARTT C,y1Y OF CLEARWAER TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 7OF7 • Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-5624567 Fax: 727-5624865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 0 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) - APPLICANT NAME l l? 1AN&,GV G?'Ol M? 1.0WN ?IT LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 1105 N' :F0V_'1r PHONE NUMBER: 1-t o 0020 FAX NUMBER: 4}-?a 0002 1®`VC1 I PROPERTY OWNER(S): -1 t,1 AN CJ4_= OLP , WW ROB PINGS , L LC E (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signs ure(s) on page 6) NOV 0 8 2005 AGENT NAME: 20M^? (A- CI"' OF C LEA; MAILING ADDRESS: ?O! ? N V - ?O^1 ? 4 99 6&IN . Cpl F-W:T-e) --y: ?_ 7q -7SG PHONE NUMBER: "t't (0 0020 FAX NUMBER: 0002 It A L . CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (if 0 listed , please e the or of thWdocument in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 4Se:e i PARCEL SIZE: j5( 06 o)Crj% . 2-201.3 tct 51 (acres, square feet) lJ? PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 2 S 1 1CI`/ICi? (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square ootage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Tic( Attach sheets and be specific when identifying request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PR VIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO V (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable di C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) I ? SUBMIT A COPYOF THE ?NT?7T INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see I page 6) 5 D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. he proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed se. firp V/ 19; 4. T e proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 5. Th proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. Th on design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, adjacent properties. ? P? vide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and alooment standards. Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater 9 0 ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) CIAQ? 94 Ye 3. T uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. Th uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Sui ble sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise ava able in the City of Clearwater. 6. The evelopment of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the pa I proposed for development. 7. The esign of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the imm diate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexi ility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the ben unit a D ediate vicini of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. RE E PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9. Adeq ate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 1d?df l clfwfil'tirr?6Y2 ttlER avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The esign of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use sepa ate sheets as necessary. Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design C Manual and 4202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that I?t' g of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area do tlgu _ requirement. rr ''rr If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: NOV O 8 2005 Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; PLANNING DEPARTMEN All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; CITY OF CLEARWATER Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included provided. Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) 6 *?- ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ]ll iCXJi1C?t ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) Aifoc? ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; - All existing and proposed points of access; - All required sight triangles; - Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; - Location of all public and private easements; Page 4 of 7 - Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ? 0 ORIGINAL Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stone-water management facilities; ??CENED Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: NOV Q 8 2005 Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; pLANNING DEPARTMENT Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; CITY OF CLEARWATER Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/: X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: ?eetl?dl All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 0 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: '1T'-' (4-n)GtP, on-o gwp' fp` prN2s -efi a{. (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 30!?t ,30C,?o3001 N• 06e-F.a.A AWO, 1•10 I-oN4Us •, Lt torv•F0r-TM 15.0 NJ 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) ?1west U n its -)&%d !?!?v?a+r'e 'Faat•a?e r blic ?ni ' es since-h ive ?? 1 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (histtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property wner 10 Prop rty Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before a the undersigned,?an officer duly commissioned by th? ws of the Ptpte of Florida on this`K?•C day of no ? personally appeared K who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that h she ned. My Commission Expires: D r. f% r. it ir r% r` i NoYlry PuOfo - SaM of Fbrfd? a "M V W V Lru L df P "" CoetttlWm • W 45413 N4;,;tI Borwled tVd" Aam. NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT S:IPlanning DepartmentVipplication Formsldev t% ~Opomprehensive infill redevelopment application 2005.doc Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. 6G>? ? ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; , ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) p? ?/ ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).???' i/ii?? ? Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? I 11- ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs aand each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. ?Naffic c Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the Department at (727) 562-4750. NOV 0 8 2005 L. SIGNATURE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made irA?ii? ? OF ?+9?fFPE`OFKERDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS appli on true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and worn to and subscribed before me this day of auth City representatives to visit and photograph the property ?2.f A.D. 20th and/or by d c' hi application.w is personally known s produced identification. property owne presentative Notary public, \ fiAam ? coo s My commission expires: (.cxrraackrp 0 D04541M F; 11P#+ Ry Nakxwl NoWv As Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater Ie • • Tr i. ' 9 • D€VELOPMENT COMPANY. LLC ANIL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater OR G 1NAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NEW COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDO DEVELOPMENT AT 302, 304, 308, 312, 314, 400, 404 AND 303, 309 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE; 400 410 ]ONES STREET AND 410 N. FORT HARRISON, DOWNTOWN CLEAR 1??C For Submission to the CDB, revised to comply with DRC comments of 3 November, 2005. r4 n 2005 D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 3-913. A) Summary OLANNING DEPARTMEN CITY OF CLEARWATER This submittal makes slight amendments to a submittal (FLD2005-04034) that was approved by the CDB on 19 July 2005. In the interest of simplicity, these changes are detailed in the next few pages. The bulk of the rest of this Narrative replicates closely the original approved Proposal for reference purposes. The only changes that have been made to this portion are not substantive and reflect only minor updates to include the changes referred to above. There are essentially three changes. • • First, in accordance with City intentions to create more retail presence on Fort Harrison, more retail space was created on the ground floor at Harrison Village by moving the seven residential units that were there into the Island View • component. This created an entire ground floor of retail and commercial space. • Second, as was discussed when the project was approved during at the CDB meeting on 19 July 2005, additional • parking has been added. While the previous allocation of parking was approved, it was felt that more parking could only help the viability of the retail component. The parking count has been increased from 503 to 633, an increase of • 130 places. Third, it became apparent that a small portion (4,900 sf, or 0.11 acre) of land sticking out on the southern side of the site was superfluous to our necessities and vital to the viability of a neighbor's proposed project on our southern boundary. This piece of land had housed the Island View trash compactors and generators. It is felt that it was far better for the street frontage to have a live building there instead of trash compactors, however nicely they may have been housed. In the interest of creating a better overall environment, this small portion has been sold to the neighbor. The solid waste handling area has have since been redesigned and located within into the base structure of the Island View towers. As a consequence of these relatively minor changes the approval of the CDB is again required, as the overall site area has changed, and although the total number of units remains the same, the effect of this and the additional retail on the FAR has necessitated increasing the request for square footage from the Density Pool. Naturally, additional contributions back to the City in the form of streetscape, public art, and increased parking have been made. Density Pool (Public Incentives Amenities Pool) Application is being made for an increase in unit density due to the provision of a significant retail and commercial component along Fort Harrison. This has incurred a significant hardship for the developer in which necessitates an increased number of residential units needed in order to make the project viable. Application is being made to draw units, and square footage for the commercial component, from the Clearwater Downtown Density Pool. The lots, which are contiguous, total approximately 220,319 sf or 5.06 acres. The allowable density on sites over two acres in this area is 50 units/acre. Portion of the site (8,693 sf, or 0.1995 acres) is TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 1 OF 36 T r,. g 1, ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • designated as an environmental area where only i dwelling unit is allowed per acre. The balance available for development is therefore 220,319 - 8,693 = 211,626 sf, or 4.86 acres. The total office/retail component is 26,124 sf. The FAR (0.5) for the office/retail component equates to 52,248 sf. Total site (211,626 sf) less 52,248 sf = 159,378 sf or 3.66 acres. At 50 units/acre this allows for • 183 units. The total number of units planned is 324, or an increase 41?units. In the previously approved request, the ratio between requested/allowed units was 324/205, or 37%. The ratio in this proposal between requested/allowed units is 324/183 or 44%. The reason for the increased request includes the desire to align with City intentions to promote mixed-use development in • this area. The City has also mandated and required that commercial and retail components be included on • Fort Harrison. While the Applicant is very happy to do this, and feels, as the City does, that this can only serve to enhance the viability of Downtown, the FAR of 0.5 is too low to encourage mixed-use development and in fact places a large burden on the developer. An FAR of 0.5 means that for every square foot of retail/commercial use provided, two square feet have to be set aside from the total site. The previous proposal showed residences on Osceola; these have been moved into the Island View portion of the site, and replaced with commercial/ retail space, covering the entire ground floor of Harrison Village. The provision of this additional retail space, coupled with the burden of the low FAR has • necessitated the Applicant to ask for the additional units from the Density Pool, as well as a dispensation from the City for the extra square footage. Per the calculations shown on Page 11 of this proposal, in order to maintain the previously approved total of 119 units form the Density Pool, and additional 9,400 sf • is requested from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. • In exchange for this allowance form the Density Pool, the developer proposes extensive provision of Streetscaping to meet City standards. The total value of the complete Streetscape package for the • previous proposal approached $2 million, and in this latest version has topped $2.6 million. The Applicant's contribution to the Density Pool as outlined below far exceeds the previously approved contribution, due to the increase in quantity and quality of streetscape provided. More specific data is included below. • It is proposed that these units be granted from the Density Pool, with a concomitant increase in height from a limit of 40' to 50' across the Harrison Village site. This height increase was previously approved in the last proposal. The Island View waterfront condo site tops out at 150'. This height is allowed on the west side of Osceola, . and 150' was previously approved for this development. Additionally, this proposal requests that 9,400 sf be granted from the Downtown Pool for the increased commercial use proposed along in the Harrison Village component, • Existing conditions We investigated the Harrison Village and Island View sites before demolition began. Existing on site we found at least 56 0 separate dwelling units. They were identified by on-site visual inspection, consultation with the property manager and counting mailboxes. We also noted 7,933 sf office, and 14,120 sf retail space for a total of 22,053 sf of • retail/commercial space. The office and retail area was calculated from records at the Pinella r praisers • Offices, and a visual inspection of the site. ???? • The increased density meets the intent of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. ? Nov o 8 2005 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC CITY OF CLEARWATER 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR WATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • 2OF36 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • w • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •f Ti?i\ g I e 'O---LOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL Parking The parking within the Robotic Parking garage will be allocated as follows. Total number of spaces available is 633. Of these, 486 will be allocated to the residents of Island View and Harrison Village. (1.5 per unit). Another 54 will be allocated to the commercial/retail component, at a rate of 2 per 1,000 sf. Given that the Applicant anticipates a maximum of 12 stores in Harrison Village, a capture rate of 4-plus parking places per store is ample supply for management and workers in the retail/commercial component. This leaves a balance of 91 spaces. Given the flexibility of the Robotic Parking system, and its ability to learn from usage patterns, the Applicant wishes to reserve the right to use the system to allocate these extra places where they are needed most. Initially, about 30 spaces will be reserved for guests, with the balance (60) given over to casual public parking. Should it happen that more pedestrian usage to the stores occurs than is anticipated, more spaces may be given over to guests or even sold on to residents. By the same token, the Applicant may discover an increased need for public parking for users of the retail stores, in which case these "floating" spaces will be allocated for that use. A system of parking card validation will most probably be used to encourage users of the shops in Harrison Village to park in the garage. The applicant further proposes make to provision for on-street parking along the west side of Fort Harrison between Jones and Georgia. On-street parking is also proposed on both sides of the newly re-aligned and widened Osceola. Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape plans. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. PROPOSAL OF AMENITIES to be provided in exchange for extra units from Density Pool Contributions to Streetscape These items are noted below for an indication of the quality of the Streetscaping that is envisaged. Please see Streetscape drawings for further data. Specifications are taken from City of Clearwater Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan, January 27th, 2003. We acknowledge this document is subject to change. For purposes of clarity, we used the'Commercial A' and'B' Streetscaping standards as our baseline. It was felt that the 'Downtown Corridor' grade of streetscaping was inapplicable in that it called for extensive provision of medians, crosswalks and work in the Right of Way, beyond the curb line. We will be providing extensive streetscaping in the areas behind the curb line and they will generally provide a level above that of Commercial A and B and equivalent to the Downtown Corridor standards. There will be a transit shelter, newspaper racks, bollards, and signage (indicating that this site is in the Old Bay neighborhood) and other items called for in the Downtown corridor standards but not in the Commercial A and B. The contributions would comprise, generally New road (re-aligned Osceola), resurfacing to Jones and Georgia New curb and curb cuts as needed Pavers and sidewalk to match Streetscape specification on each street as noted below Street lights Quality Hill, Hancock post or equal Bollards Hancock by Spring City or equal Signage To conform to City of Clearwater Wayfinding plan Benches Scarborough with center arm by Landscape Forms or equal Trash Cans Scarborough by Landscape Forms or equal Iczz? ????n ?r1 Bicycle racks Gramercy by Madrax or as required `vll? ]?\ Newspaper racks (if required) Spencer or equal Landscape fences on ground level planters Steel Bar by A & T Ironworks or equal Planting Medjool Palms, Crape Myrtle N0V 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRIAN13LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC OF CLEARWA ER 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(a)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 3OF 36 ®x{`Tri? g1e • +'f DEVELOPMENTCOMPANV, LLC ORIG Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater INAL • The palms on Fort Harrison would be planted not along the right-of-way but instead between the site boundary and the building, as the sidewalk is not very wide on this block and there is more space towards the buildings, which have been expressly set back to accommodate lush landscaping. • Along Fort Harrison • COMMERCIAL A Equivalent Streetscape will match that proposed in City document with regard to all items behind (and including) curb. We will not differentiate between the treatment given to the area between the building and the site boundary and the area from the site boundary to the curb. • Along ]ones COMMERCIAL A Equivalent • Same as for Fort Harrison, except trees at greater spacing, say 50', to suit layout of buildings. Palms would be used predominantly on the Fort Harrison end of Jones, changing to predominantly oaks at the Osceola end, to ease the • transition into the oaks on Osceola. Pavers, streetlights to suit. • Along re-aligned Osceola COMMERCIAL B Equivalent • Palms at corners and trees elsewhere to match existing live oaks. Paving as above but much less of benches, signage etc. • Along Georgia COMMERCIAL B Equivalent • Palms would be used predominantly on the Fort Harrison end changing to predominantly oaks at the Osceola end, to ease the transition into the oaks on Osceola. Paving as above but much less of benches, signage etc. If Fort Harrison is • 100%, and Jones 80%, this street is 80% at the retail, 60% at the residential. Previous submittals concerned themselves only with the southern side of Georgia. This application will address the northern side of Georgia below Osceola and especially the treatment of the western end of Georgia and the creation of a "mini-park" where GeRSCENED w waterway. • Cross Walks • Two pedestrian crosswalks cross the re-aligned Osceola from Harrison Village to Island View. NOV 0 8 2005 edians PLANNING DEPARTMENT M None. Parking CITY OF CLEARWATER • As noted above, the Applicant wishes to dedicate the balance of 91 spaces where they are needed most. Initially, • about 30 spaces will be reserved for guests, with the balance (about 60) given over to casual public parking. This allocation may vary, depending on need. More spaces may be given over to guests, residents, or public parking for users • of the retail stores, in which case these "floating" spaces will be allocated for that use. • The applicant further proposes make to provision for on-street parking along the west side of Fort Harrison between • Jones and Georgia. On-street parking is also proposed on both sides of the newly re-aligned and widened Osceola. Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape plans. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. • Clock towers • Two individually designed clock towers anchor the north and south corners of the site, on Fort Harrison, are an integral part of the design. The will each have purpose-made clocks on the street faces, and are in fact the signature features of the development. We propose these be counted as part of the streetscape contribution. • Fountains (Public Art contribution) A purpose-made fountain will be located mid-block on Fort Harrison, and another two within the arcades which are accessible to the public. There will also be a fountain mid-block on the Island View side of Osceola, and one each at the two entrances to the towers. They will all be site-specific, individually tailored to their locations. At present we anticipate • using glass sculptures as an integral part of the fountains, purpose-made by a nationally known local glass sculptor. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: I NFO _TRI AN G LEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 4OF36 • • • • • • • • • • • iTr411 g1e • ?? DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL Transit Shelter There is an existing bus stop on Fort Harrison. If it is to be replaced, it will be done to the design shown in the Wayfinding manual. Application will be made to PSTA to move it to the north, onto other property owned by Triangle. Maintenance of items in Right-of Way To be agreed. • FDOT Permit Preliminary meetings have been held with Florida Department of Transportation, and their approval, which is essentially • simply for closure of several curb cuts, be required only prior to issuance of Building Permits. We anticipate that the • transfer of Alt 19 back to the City will occur during the Harrison Village construction period. Any work done within the Right of Way on Fort Harrison would be done after it has been transferred back to the City, making FDOT approval • superfluous. • Additional items supplied concurrent with present Application • In addition to the extra parking described above, the Applicant proposes to add additional and upgraded Streetscape to the north side of Georgia between the relocated Osceola and the water (some 340 feet). This would be installed to • City specifications on the right-of-way and with the agreement of the neighbors to the north in 500 N Osceola. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • More intensive landscaping and streetscaping and hardscaping would be performed to the terminal portion of Georgia Street, where it meets the water. This is an area about 60' in length across the end of the Right-of-way . The present condition of this west end of Georgia Street is an unkempt jungle, inaccessible and potentially dangerous. This last portion of the street at present does not exist as a street. The design for this area would include at least two sets of benches, bike racks and possibly a shade structure, along with lush landscaping, winding paths and seating areas. It would obviously be fully accessible to the public and would in fact be a kind of "mini-park" where anyone could enjoy the sunset. Trash cans would also be provided and signs discouraging occupancy by vagrants. Benches and trash cans and any other street furniture would follow the recommendations and specifications included in the Wayfinding requirements. This feature would be built in the public Right of Way, so would be designed, permitted and constructed in very close coordination with the relevant departments at the City, and to the City standards and specifications. RECE3VED NOV 0 8 2005 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC PLANNING DEPARTMENT 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 ?/? TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOO)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.IGOI.?Y OFCLEARWAfER 5 of 36 Additionally, the landside retention wall on the west of the Island View site will not be terminated at the Georgia Street right-of-way but will rather be continued across the base of Georgia Street to meet the existing seawall at 500 N Osceola, subject to requirements of the City and engineering specifications. This will provide an additional layer of security and safety. The portion of Georgia Street from where it presently ends (see left) to the mini-park mentioned above will be sodded with an appropriate grass, and the subsoil reinforced to allow the passage of emergency vehicles on a surface that is green and attractive, and is not asphalt. Trees growing in the RoW will be removed and replaced with more appropriate foliage at the sides of the road. The view-corridor to the water will be restored. w. T r-l i s g 1 e • -DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC- J H elping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater GINAL ORI Quantities Associated with Streetscape in Approved Proposal Osceola Avenue Item Total ROW. Material Quantity Unit cost cost Pedestrian Light 23 ea. $4,800 $110,400 Bench 4 ea. $1,700 $6,800 Curb & Gutter 6" 1340 If $17 $22,110 Street Paving 21800 sf $5 $109,000 Walk w/Paver Banding 6425 sy $12 $77,100 Crosswalk Paver 80 sy $90 $7,200 Trash Receptacle 2 ea. $950 $1,900 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea. $50,000 $50,000 Demolition 1 ea. $25,000 $25,000 Directional Signage 1 ea. $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions, 0 & P $61,577 $61,577 Architectural/Engineering Fees $28,736 $28,736 Subtotal $175,344 Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 2447 sf $12 $29,364 Unit Pavers 6160 sf $12 $73,920 Scored Concrete 2500 sf $12 $30,000 Fountain W/Artwork 5 ea $25,000 $125,000 Live Oak 16 ea $2,600 $41,600 Medjool Palm 11 ea $6,000 $66,000 RECEWED Planting Areas 9363 sf $5 $46,815 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 0 If $14 $0 NOV 0 8 2005 Bench 4 ea. $1,700 $6,800 Bike Rack 4 ea $640 $2,560 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Trash Receptacle 4 ea $950 $3,800 CITY OF CLEARWATER General Conditions 0. & P. $64,404 $64,404 Architectural/Engineering Fees $30,055 $30,055 Subtotal $523,818 Total $699,162 ]ones Street ROW. Pedestrian Light 2 ea $4,800 $9,600 Curb & Gutter 6" 125 If $17 $2,063 Street Paving 1600 sf $5 $8,000 Walk W/Paver Banding 675 sf $12 $8,100 Crosswalk Paver 36 sy $90 $3,240 Bollards 3 ea $1,470 $4,410 Trash Receptacle 1 ea $950 $950 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Demolition 1 ea $15,000 $15,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions 0. & P. $8,604 $8,604 Architectural/Engineering Fees $4,015 $4,015 Subtotal $69,982 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: IINFO OO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 6OF36 • Try 1. g 1 e • ' DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC ORIGINAL ..?. . .. Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Public/Private Georgia Street Walk W/Paver Banding 650 sf $12 $7,800 Live Oak 2 ea $2,600 $5,200 Planter/Landscape 72 sf $30 $2,160 Planting Areas 660 sf $5 $3,300 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 105 If $14 $1,418 Trash Receptacle 3 ea $950 $2,850 General Conditions 0. & P. $3,934 $3,934 Architectural/Engineering Fees $1,836 $1,836 Subtotal $31,998 Total $101,980 ROW. Pedestrian Light 9 ea $4,800 $43,200 Curb & Gutter 6" 735 If $17 $12,128 Walk W/Paver Banding 1300 sf $12 $15,600 Street Paving 11200 sf $5 $56,000 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $25,000 $25,000 Demolition, and Grading 1 ea $25,000 $25,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 Bollards 8 ea $1,470 $11,760 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 Bench 2 ea. $1,700 $3,400 General Conditions 0. 8L P. $29,248 $29,248 Architectural/Engineering Fees $13,649 $13,649 Subtotal $237,885 Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 1425 sf $12 $17,100 Medjool Palm 2 ea $6,000 $12,000 RECEYED Live Oak 11 ea $2,600 $28,600 Planter/Landscape 128 sf $30 $3,840 Planting Areas 8740 sf $5 $43,700 NOV Q 8 2005 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 280 If $135 $37,800 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 CITY OF CLEARWATER General Conditions 0. & P. $22,266 $22,266 Architectural/Engineering Fees $10,391 $10,391 Subtotal $181,097 Total $418,982 North Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. Pedestrian Light 12 ea $4,800 $57,600 Bench 5 ea $1,700 $8,500 Curb & Gutter 6" 592 If $17 $9,768 Sidewalk w/ Paver 3462 sf $12 $41,544 Transit Shelter 1 ea $10,000 $10,000 Bollards 18 ea $1,470 $26,460 Fountain W/Artwork 1 ea $50,000 $50,000 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARW ATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 7OF36 •-,-Tri 1e 'D DEVELOPMENT COMP Y, LLC ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Public/Private Site Amenities Totals Trash Receptacle 5 ea $950 $4,750 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $22,000 $22,000 Demolition 1 ea $30,000 $30,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions O. & P. $39,243 $39,243 Architectural/Engineering Fees $18,314 $18,314 Subtotal $319,179 Scored Concrete 3280 sf $12 $39,360 Fountain W/Artwork 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Medjool Palm 12 ea $6,000 $72,000 Planter/Landscape 248 sf $30 $7,440 Planting Areas 5014 sf $5 $25,070 Irrigation 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Clock 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Fence 420 If $22 $9,240 Bike Rack 2 ea $640 $1,280 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 General Conditions O. & P. $54,194 $54,194 Architectural/Engineering Fees $25,290 $25,290 Subtotal $440,774 Total $759,953 Osceola Avenue ROW. $175,344 Public/ Private $523,818 3ones Street ROW. $69,982 Public/ Private $31,998 Georgia Street ROW. REC $237,885 Public/ EIVED Private $181,097 North Ft NOV o 2005 Harrison Avenue Row. Public/ PLANNING DEPARTMENT $319,179 Private CITY OF CLEARWATER $440,774 Sub-Totals ROW. $802,390 Public/ Private $1,177,686 Total $1,980,076 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 8 OF 36 • Trl g1e • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LlC ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Additional Quantities Associated with Present Proposal The following quantities and estimated costs are associated with the increased scope of work for Site Amenities associated with the present Proposal, and are in addition to those costs associated with the already approved proposal. Additional Streetscaping to Georgia Street ROW Pedestrian Light 5 ea $4,800 $24,000 Bench 4ea $1,700 $6,800 Curb & Gutter 6" 735 If $17 $12,495 Sidewalk w/Paver 250 sf $12 $3,000 Shelter 1 ea $10,000 $10,000 Bollards 12 ea $1,470 $17,640 Trash Receptacle 4 ea $950 $3,800 Underground Site Utilities O ea $22,000 $0 Clearing and grubbing 1 ea $20,000 $20,000 Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 Scored Concrete 400 sf $12 $4,800 Medjool Palm 2 ea $6,000 $12,000 Landscape 1440 sf $30 $43,200 Planting Areas (N side) 1800 sf $5 $9,000 Irrigation 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Clock 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Retaining wall 60 If $250 $15,000 Bike Rack 2ea $640 $1,280 General Conditions O. & P. 1 Is $18,583 $18,583 Architectural/Engineering Fees l is $8,672 $8,672 Total $316,270 Jones Street Relocate overhead power lines 1 Is $250,000 $250,000 to underground General Conditions O. & P. 1 Is $37,500 $37,500 Architectural/Engineering Fees l is $17,500 $17,500 Subtotal $305,000 Thus it can be seen that the total cost of the site amenities provided totals over $2,6 million. RECEIVED Nov 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER, TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOPTRIANGLEOEVELOPMENT.COM 9OF36 • "Try. g 1e • - DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Comparative Analysis of Approved Request and Present Application Harrison Village, Island View (Approved at CDB 19 July 2005) HV and IV site area Retail/commercial area Area available after adjustment for FAR Units Units allowed after subtracting FAR area Request from Density Pool 216,543sf 4.97acres 18,893 sf 0.43 acres 178,757 sf 324 205 119 Parking total 503 Parking for residents @ 1.5/unit 486 Parking for retail @ 0/1,000 sf 0 Balance 17 Harrison Village, Island View (Request 30 September 2005) HV and IV site area Retail/commercial area Area available after adjustment for FAR Units Units allowed after subtracting FAR area Request from Density Pool 211,626 Sf 4.86 acres 276,124 Sf 0.60 acres 159,378 Sf 324 183 141 Parking total 633 Parking for residents @ 1.5/unit 486 Parking for retail @ 2/1,000 sf 54 Balance 93 DECEIVED NOV 08 2005 ?'iANNINGDEPgRTMENT CITY OFC(EARWgTER TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRI5ON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(O)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 1 0 OF 36 Harrison Village, Island View (Request approved at CDB August 2005) ._J sf ac V and IV (less environmental area) 216,543 4.97 Units HV 46 2 over park Parking IV E 18 2 over ret IV 0 Ui IV S 116 14 On-street 0 IV N 144 14 Garage 503 216,543 4.97 324 503 ? R and Residential Mix Calculation AW Comm HV 18,893 18,893 2005 11 07 ii/commercial sf FAR Site Area less Ret/Comm @ Units/Ac Allowed Planned Requested Req/AII 18,893 sf @ 0.5 = 37,786 sf 216,543 sf 178,757 sf = 4.10 acres 50 205 324 119 Units 37% parking Requirements Residential Units Commercial 0 /1,000sf Total Provided Balance 324 @ 1.5 = 486 18,893 sf = @ 0 486 503 17 Harrison Village, Island View, Retail only on HV, added parking (December 2005 CDB'request) D Units w_ sf ac HV 39 2 over retail Parking' Retail Commercial (} U HV 52,948 1.22 IV E 18 2 over park 90" 42 HV 18,893 IV 158,678 3.64 IV S 118 80" 297 Extra 7,231 3 U IV N 149 285 60" 294 rr S O 211,626 4.86 324 633 26,124 :.FAR and Residential Mix Calculation !Retail/commercial sf FAR Site Area less RetjComm @ Units/Ac' Allowed Planned Requested Reg/All 26,124 sf@ 0.5 = 52,248 sf 211,626 sf' 1591378 sf= 3.66 acres 50 183 324 141 Units 44%i I6,724 sf @" 0.5 = 33,448 sf 211,626 sf 178,178 sf : 4.09 acres 50 205 324 119 Units 37°l0 9,400 balance of sf requested, in order to maintain previously approved number of units requested) (119) :Parking Requirements Residential Units Commercial 2 /1,000sf> Total Provided Balance 324 1.5 = 486 26,124 sf' _ Cd 2 52 538' <633 95 Page 11 of 35 g DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ? ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Original Narrative The rest of this Narrative replicates closely the original approved Proposal for reference purposes. The • only changes that have been made to this portion are not substantive and reflect only minor updates to include the changes referred to above. 0 • Site The site for this development is located east and west of North Osceola Avenue, between Jones and Georgia Streets. On • the east of Osceola a low-rise, mixed use development is planned. This will be known as Harrison Village. A high-rise condo consisting of two towers joined by a low-rise component is planned on the west of Osceola. This will be called 0 Island View. The parcels have been assembled into a single development site, for which this Master Plan is proposed. • They will be unified in design. 0 The existing substandard Osceola Avenue will be upgraded to meet City requirements, widened to a 50' right-of way • (from 40? and have two awkward bends removed. It will also have parking on both sides and be fully streetscaped. • In addition, the Jones street end of the Harrison Village block will have all the unsightly overhead power lines removed and relocated underground. 0 • The area of the total site is 211,626 sf or 4.86 acres • A Unity of Title document is in progress with our Counsel, Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP. Similarly, street vacation and dedication procedures will parallel this application. Harrison Village • The portion to the east of Osceola Avenue is called for the purposes of this submission Harrison Village. The location is • on the block bounded by the re-located Osceola Avenue to the west, Jones Street to the south, Fort Harrison Avenue to the east and Georgia Street to the north. This portion of the project consists of a mixed used development with 0 street level retail and commercial components along Fort Harrison, Jones Georgia and the north and south portions • of Osceola, under a sheltering arcade, and extensive streetscaping around the entire block. Additionally, the block is crossed at two places with internal arcades. This site's residential component comprises 39 high-quality condominium • units and approximately 26,124 sf of commercial/retail space. 0 The residents will enter the development through one of two arcades that cross the block, or through a centrally located • elevator core. Residents will be able to enjoy a rooftop pool, spa and barbecue area. • The Harrison Village site was previously occupied on the west by four two-story dwelling units that were rented out on a weekly and monthly basis. These existing structures on site dated back to 1925 and 1939, were not well maintained, and have since been demolished. The "Salvation Army" site to the east site has eight buildings, two residential and the rest • for social services, offices, and retail associated with the function of the Salvation Army. Their construction dates range from 1924 to 1992 with the bulk being older buildings with build dates around 1940 to 1960. Although the buildings are . in fair to good condition, the Salvation Army has since moved to newer and larger facilities elsewhere in Clearwater, and • all the existing buildings on the sites will be demolished for the new development. • Island View The portion of the development to the west of Osceola, and known as Island View, comprises two high-rise condo • towers joined by a low-rise component. The North Tower will contain 118 and the South Tower 149 units. The low- rise portion between the two towers contains the automatic parking garage. The automatic parking garage is accessed off Osceola. 0 Above the garage are two stories of residences, 18 in number. The total number of units for the whole building is 285. • Island View will have a lavish Clubhouse with meeting facilities, exercise room, pool and spa, coffee bar, and ample . storage facilities for the residents. . The south part of the Island View site had on it four older buildings dating from 1900 to 1955. They w having recently been used for short-term rentals. All have since been demolished. RECENEDD, TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR WATER. FL 33755 L?O? TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 ?002 EMAIL: INFO(70 TRIAN GLEDEV ELOPMENT.COM • • 1 2 OF 36 DLANNING DEPARTIW'"ITV OF CLEARW 11 • RI?USVVEDO/ 4rli.. gle • • ?oY OV X /?(1 (?4uJ 'w ? DEVELOiMFNT COM?ANV, LLC , , _ ORIGINAL ' • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Tr i?'ng'I? el6?ih{ PLANNING DEPARTMENT Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • • 5` total of $12,830,000 for the Harrison Village and Island View sites. The taxable • valuations for these sites total $3,964,700. The proposed value of the improvements for Harrison Village and Island View • is in the region of $170m. • All sites are within the Old Bay character district of Downtown Clearwater. • GENERAL APPLICABILITY REQUIREMENTS • 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character • of adjacent properties in which it is located. • This site is unique in its location. Proximity to the water, new Library, the Bluff, Coachman Park and the proposed • Marina, as well as being a gateway for northern development from the Downtown core along Osceola Avenue, all make it highly desirable. • Adjacent properties consist of, to the south, the Osceola Inn, a six-story mid-rise hotel; to the south-west, the • SandCastle religious retreat, a newer seven story building; to the west and south, Belvedere Apartments, an older • (1950's) seven-story mid-rise condo block; to the north-west, a high rise condo (500 N Osceola); to the North, low-rise residential and commercial including an automobile repair facility; and to the east, mixed use low-rise retail and commercial. • The scale of adjacent buildings varies greatly. Single family, one-story homes exist alongside mid-rise condos. Generally • speaking, the single-family residential structures are all older and most are in need of repair. As regards adjacent buildings, there are none to the east and the west as these sides front entirely on Fort Harrison and Old Clearwater Bay. A parking lot and two seven-story towers occupy the block to the south, and to the north there are a condo tower, single • story commercial and garage buildings, and two story residences. The larger buildings are newer or recently refurbished (SandCastle, Osceola Inn). The height of the proposed new buildings at Harrison Village is 50, with stepbacks at 30' and • with extensive variation in footprint and elevation. This scale thus forms an appropriate link between the higher • structures to the south and the lower building stock prevalent to the north and east • The Island View building aligns with existing high-rises on the Waterway. • No new low-rise single-family residential development has occurred in this area for about forty years. The last condo • development (500 N Osceola, a high-rise) was built in 1975 and only recently has a five story condo has been completed at 700 N Osceola. • The bulk of the existing buildings around the site varies from one to seven stories, and from a tower (Osceola Inn) to • more traditional apartment prototypes. • Prolific use has been made of setbacks and stepbacks in the proposed development. On the Harrison Village site the • units have been stepped back at the second-floor level and have had careful attention paid to the detailing of all facades visually to decrease the bulk of the structures. They have been broken up with roofs, balconies, decks and trellises as • well as stepbacks. These are somewhat difficult to read on plan. Attention is drawn to the sections and perspective • drawings. • On Fort Harrison, the Harrison Village retail buildings have been set back on average 15ft from the site boundary. Within this setback an arcade runs the length of the site, varying in width from 7 to 11ft. The distance from the boundary to the • curb is 7 to 15 ft. This allows for extensive street- and landscaping. • Along Georgia the setback from the curb is 16 to 23ft, along ]ones 15 to 20ft, and along Osceola the setback runs from • 12 to 16ft from the site boundary, and another 5 to 13' to the curb. Again, space allowed for extensive street- and • landscaping. • The attached streetscape drawings illustrate this better and show the considerable care that has been taken with the private and public interface around the development. Extensive provisions have been made for a gradient from • public to semi-public to semi-private to private space. Storefronts along North Fort Harrison will have wide covered TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARW^^ATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: I NFOI?!TRI AN 6 LEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 13 OF 36 0 RtU:1V1:L) • ?I??? n 2005 T r 1 g 1 e • • t'" I`VEIOPMENT COMPANY, ELC ORI GINAL 'I ANNINC' DFPAPTMK Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • walkway ``Nrroh o1`t' A ,"1ii16g it possible to traverse the length of the block under cover, as well as two arcades crossing the site. These will be a boon in typical tropical Florida weather. Further drawings show how this area relates to • the sidewalk and the street. This covered walkway will provide shelter to pedestrians, and shade storefronts against • direct sunlight. • The residents will enter the development through one of three entrances on the street. . The two Island View towers have also had careful attention paid to detailing so that they do not appear to be monolithic blocks, extruded up into the sky. They follow very basic rules of design in being differentiated vertically into the three components of a base, a body, and a capital. The base, which will be the parking level, has a different . texture and color from the body, where most of the units will be situated. The capital is the topmost (penthouse) level, where decks have been increased and close scrutiny has been paid to the detailing of the parapets and pediments that form the roofline. Again, on Island View, there are significant stepbacks to reduce the mass of the building about the 30' and 50' level on • the Osceola face, and about the 100' level on the north, south and west sides. The coverage of the site differs from those surrounding it in that all the surrounding buildings have extensive surface • parking for their cars, mostly uncovered. In this development almost all the parking will occur inside the building in the enclosed automatic garage, and thus the actual coverage will be much less than a typical building of this type. As regards density, the number of dwelling units being proposed is slightly higher than the norm for the area. This aligns with the Vision for the Downtown redevelopment which calls for the development of a variety of residential • projects to attract new residents to Downtown, and which is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. (Quotations in italics.) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of . adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The character of adjacent properties varies from newer high-rise condos in good shape to single story rooming houses. The immediate vicinity will be materially upgraded by the proposed development. The developers envisage that the proposed development will set the benchmark for future development across the whole area. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The residential land use in this development is at an increased density, as called for in the Redevelopment Plan. It will • encourage others in the area to develop residential units to fulfill the vision of the Plan. The value of surrounding land . has increased significantly over just the last few months, directly as a result of the present development. • The developers believe that by redeveloping this parcel in the Downtown area further redevelopment will be encouraged, with a subsequent increase in property value. This will be the first significant residential building built in • this area since at least 1960. This can only result in an increase in property value for adjacent land. Most of the smaller residential building stock in the immediate area no longer meets the demanding standards of today's market, while the land on which they are located has increased significantly in value. This will give further incentive for future, similar • redevelopment. This is a strong vote of confidence in the potential of the area, and of the positive effects envisaged to come from the proposed development. • 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed use is residential and commercial; this use is typical of this neighborhood. In addition, all relevant Codes • will be complied with from the inception planning to construction completion. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Fort Harrison, Jones and Georgia Streets are two-way streets. There are no vehicular entrances to the property from these streets. Osceola Avenue is also a two-way street which becomes a one-way street from the intersection with Jones • to the north. It carries light local traffic (as do Georgia and Jones) and is not a major through-road. At present it is TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: IN FO ?TRI AN G LEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 14 OF 36 • r ??- Tr:gIe • :' DEVELOPMENT COM?ANV, LLC • ? __.?_.___ Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL 0 • substandard in width and difficult or even hazardous to negotiate given its winding character. The Applicant's proposal will eliminate two right-angle bends and widen the Right-of Way to a generous two-way street width. See 0 attached Traffic Study. Osceola will be widened to bring it up to standard, and it will be widened and converted to two-way traffic flow. • Harrison Village and Island View residents will enter the automatic parking from Osceola. The automatic parking garage has seven Entry/Exit Stations (EES's) and about 85ft between street and the closest EES door. This provides ample • stacking space. The system is designed to make multiple storage and retrieval activities at the same time. Typical dwell times (between each parking cycle) are between about 150 seconds when running at full capacity. This results in • a throughput capability of about 180 to 240 vehicles per hour for all seven Entry/Exit Stations. With this configuration vehicle may enter or exit at any station, allowing for the fastest possible throughput. In order to • prevent cars from trying to enter and exit from the same bay at the same time at the Robotic Parking, indicator lights will tell drivers which bays can be used, similar to those at Toll Booths. The entries will also be actively signed so that • vehicles attempting to enter the garage when there is any congestion will be waved off and be able to bypass the entrance entirely. No backing up of traffic. Please see attached White Paper for more data. Pedestrian traffic will be protected by active signage, and any approaching traffic will be low-speed and will be highly visible, providing a long • reaction distance. A system of parking card validation will most probably be used to encourage users of the shops in Harrison Village to • park in the garage. The applicant further proposes make to provision for on-street parking along the west side of Fort Harrison between )ones and Georgia. On-street parking is also proposed on both sides of the newly re-aligned and widened Osceola. Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape . plans. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community character is residential and commercial, ranging from condos to single-family houses, and single story retail and commercial uses. This development provides an increased density for residential purposes, and increased retail/commercial components, directly related to the streets. The immediate vicinity will be materially upgraded by the proposed development. The existing building stock has generally seen better days. The developers envisage that the proposed development will provide the neighborhood with an upmarket structure, entirely within the community character of the area, and set the benchmark for future development in the entire area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties Two separate solid waste areas will be enclosed within the two towers, where they will be enclosed, cooled and • ventilated to minimize olfactory and unsightly visual impact. This is in excess of Code requirements. Thus, no adverse visual acoustic or olfactory impacts are envisioned on adjacent properties. The location of the Solid Waste areas has also been chosen to minimize traffic disruption. The residential component will adhere to normal residential standards and residential hours of operation will apply. The • retail component will operate under normal business hours. `MCHVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC CITY OFCLEARWATER 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR WATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOnO TRIA14 GL EDEVELOPMENT.COM • 0 15 OF 36 •? Try., g1e • • ,' DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC r1 Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL i COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA • 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without • deviations from the use, intensity and development standards This proposed development does not deviate from the use standards, having only residential and commercial components. Application is being made, however, for an increase in unit density due to the provision of a significant retail and commercial component along Fort Harrison, as well as increase in the allowable square footage for the • retail/commercial component. This FAR restrictions of 0.5 have incurred a significant hardship for the developer, which • necessitates an increased number of residential units needed in order to make the project viable. i The retail component will be more neighborhood in character, with predominantly pedestrian patrons. The use of Osceola for vehicular access has freed up the entire west side of Fort Harrison for on-street parking, as well as both . sides of Osceola, increasing the total of on-street parking directly contiguous to the site. Application is thus being made to draw units from the Clearwater Downtown Density Pool. Application is also made to draw square footage for the retail/commercial component. See DENSITY POOL above for calculations. Parking • requirements are detailed on the Data Table. Additional comments in PARKING below. • The increased density meets the intent of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, as does the increased residential and retail/commercial component. • A number of alternatives are suggested in exchange for this, chief of which is the provision of streetscaping and public art. See attached documents. • • 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infll redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties (include the existing value of the site • and the proposed value of the site with the Improvements) The value of property depends on highest and best use improvements on the site and the market factors of supply and demand. The value of abutting properties will not be compromised and will most likely actually be significantly enhanced. A substantial public benefit will be created by the development itself and the creation of the pedestrian promenade along • Fort Harrison and Osceola with significant retail and commercial components. At present the developer is considering uses such as an ice-cream store, a coffee shop, a video and DVD store, a bookstore as well as professional offices for the storefronts along Fort Harrison and Osceola. Lush landscaping will be provided and pedestrian access will be • enhanced. Downtown will gain over 300 new households in an upmarket environment., as well as a new retail and commercial destination for people living in Downtown and elsewhere in Clearwater. Triangle Development paid a total of $12,830,000 for the Harrison Village and Island View sites. According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser the total of the taxable valuations for all the existing sites is $3,964,700.The proposed value • of the improvements for Harrison Village and Island View is in the region of $170m. • It should be clear from the above figures at least that not only has land become more valuable in this immediate area but also that considerable money will be invested in the development and a sharp rise can be predicted in the value of the adjoining lots. This rise has ready occurred. • 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of • Clearwater. The development is residential and commercial, and strongly encouraged by the City of Clearwater. By creating an • automated parking garage, residents will benefit from faster storage and retrieval of cars, less emissions, less heat build- up in parked cars, protection from the weather, wholly safe access and secure parking. i 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent • land uses • RECEVEID • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC N0V O 2005 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO( TRIANGLEOEVELOPMENT.COM • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 6 OF 36 CITY OF CLEARWATER • RECEIVI:LJ r • S.. ?_T r.l 1 e ? NOV o 8 2005 o?oENT ?oMP g«< ORIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater AdjlQkW (*C4AU arily residential, with commercial components along Fort Harrison. The proposed development is compatible with the existing residential components and provides upgraded retail and commercial facilities with sheltered access along Fort Harrison, the major commercial thoroughfare, and Osceola. This aligns strongly with the Vision of the Plan, to provide an increased residential base, one of the primary building blocks for a flourishing Downtown. 5. NotApplicable 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As has been indicated above, the surrounding lots are generally either already developed with higher density residential or are single-family homes waiting to be upgraded. The proposed development will serve as a forerunner for future development in this area and result in a general upgrade not only of the building stock but also of the streetscape and general ambiance of the area. 7 The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The form of the proposed development at Harrison Village is an upmarket condominium village, with a very active street interface along the busiest thoroughfare, Fort Harrison, and carefully detailed smaller scale buildings along the remaining streets. Island View is a typical high-rise form but with special attention paid to stepbacks to produce a "wedding cake" effect, which reduces the visual impact of the mass of the building. Functionally, both buildings are of a standard pattern for high and low-rise condominium buildings. The community character will be enhanced by the design. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for redevelopment and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Setbacks No flexibility is requested for lot width or required setbacks. Zero setbacks are permissible in the Downtown area. Compliance is made with the 20 ft sight triangles at the applicable corners and vehicular access points on the site. Parking On-site parking is supplied in the automated parking in the Island View garage. The majority of the automatic parking bays are handicapped-compatible. Parking requirements for residential units in this area are 1 to 1.5 per unit. There are 324 units. At 1.5 per unit, 486 are required. Over 630 places will be provided in the garage with a further 40-plus on-street parking places. Please see attached Data Table for more info. Visitors may obviously park on the street, but will more likely make use of the robotic parking. The person whom they are visiting can arrange for the remote validation of the parking to make it free. City requirements for the commercial/retail component are 2 to 4 per 1,000 sf. Whilst previous submissions were approved by the CDB with parking only for owners and a limited number of staff for the stores and offices, and zero parking requirement for casual use at the retail component, this application provides 2 parking places per 1,000 sf, and provides a large number of unallocated spaces for guests, and users of the retail/commercial facilities. The commercial component is in use during the hours that there is least residential occupancy. Given the high density of the development, it is felt that the commercial component will be served by a larger percentage of foot traffic. More people living closer equals less vehicular traffic. The robotic parking facilities can be programmed to allocate any number of places to residential or commercial uses. The capabilities and advantages of the automatic parking TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 17 OF 36 • Tri Ie • :`??ELOPMENT COMP g«<._ ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater garage to residents are the subject of a White Paper by the manufacturers, Robotic Parking, which is included in this submission. Handicap accessibility to ADA standards is incorporated in the garage. There are an additional on-street parking places created by the development, on Osceola and Fort Harrison. On- street parking within 1,000 ft of the property totals over 100 spaces, not including the Steinmart/Library lot. As use of the Density Pool is being requested, the height of the Harrison Village building will allowed to be lifted from the mandated 40' to the 50' limit. At present the design has a roof height of less than 40' so this provision may not be needed. The Developer would however choose to retain the option of increased height, should it be needed. Above the roof height 30" parapets will be extended (per definition of Height in Section 8-102 of the Clearwater Community Development Code) and the elevator and mechanical equipment rooms may extend the full permitted 16' above the allowed building height. The clocktowers on the corners of Jones, Georgia and Fort Harrison would take advantage of the definition of mechanical rooms to rise above the rooflines to create architectural embellishments which are functional and aesthetic landmarks. The Island View property remains at the 150' level. Additional units are being requested from the Density Pool, as well as square footage for retail/commercial component. This conforms to the spirit of increased density, one of the aims of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The developers have discussed a range of choices for the provision of Public Amenities, so the benefits that accrue to the developers from these units could be reciprocated. Significant contributions to Streetscape on the site were previously approved at CDB, and additional contributions for this proposal are detailed elsewhere. The developer believes this arrangement should continue to be satisfactory. The developers are very confident some mutually beneficial agreement can easily be reached, where the Downtown urban fabric is materially enhanced, for the advantage of all. Major contributions to Streetscape. Please see the attached document and drawings which detail the contributions to Streetscape. It is anticipated at this stage that the building will have covered arcades partially along the retail/commercial frontage of Fort Harrison and Osceola, and two arcades traversing the block. The sidewalks and benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks and more around the site will be brought up to the high standards of the Clearwater Streetscape, with lush landscaping. Special attention is paid in this proposal to the creation of a "mini-park" at the bottom of Georgia Street, an addition specific to this (September 2005) proposal. The landscaping proposal provides further details. At the Fort Harrison corners of Jones and Georgia, attractive working clocktowers will be built to landmark the site along the Fort Harrison corridor, which forms the entrance and gateway to Downtown Clearwater. Public Art. There will also be well-designed public fountains, located on Fort Harrison and Osceola. These will most likely be individually designed and fabricated in cast glass by a nationally known local artist, and form the Public Art amenity portion of the Public Amenities Incentive Pool (Density Pool.) In addition to the above, and specific to this present request Bicycle Traffic As the Downtown area becomes more pedestrian and bicycle friendly, and given the proximity of the site to the Pinellas Trail (two blocks) and noting the relatively large amount of bicycle traffic, secure bicycle racks (to City standards) will be provided for residents and shoppers. It is anticipated a large number of people would avail themselves of this facility. The developer has met with Felicia Leonard of the City and briefed her on the project. She was pleased with the overall project, will continue to monitor it and will have comments when more detailed plans are presented. Drop-offs Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape plans, and in the parking garage entrance off Osceola. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. Development Standards call for 1 to 1.5 parking places per unit. Retail/commercial requirement is 2D development falls within this range. (See 8 above.) Ix E; TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 r1 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOnct TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM N 0V O 8 1005 18 ?F 36 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ,r Ti.Wfg lei DEV I f /? ELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORIG Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District Design Guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. An analysis of the Downtown Redevelopment plan was made and the proposed development was found to align with many specific points, as outlined below, and contradict none. Signage The signage component will be the subject of a separate submittal. Although the tenants are not yet finalized, signage standards more strict than those of the City will be enforced. A full signage package will be submitted for review when more is known of the tenant requirements. Generally speaking, however, signage will be hung in the space under the arches of the arcade, integrated into the overall architectural design, and uniform from shop to shop. Signage for the development will most likely be made outside each entrance lobby, probably on the awning at the door. See the Streetscape drawings. Staging and Phasing Harrison Village and Island View The Island View property has had all of the existing structures demolished. Demolition of the remainder of the site is under way. Construction of relocated services and the new Osceola Avenue will follow. The developer aims to open Island View and Harrison Village at the same time. As construction for Island View will take at least 18 months, and Harrison Village less, construction will start on the Island View property first. The Harrison Village site will be used for staging the building materials associated with the first months of construction on Island View. Then the site will be cleared and construction of Harrison Village commence. Throughout all this time, the re-aligned Osceola Avenue will be graded and compacted to sub-grade, and will be kept passable for emergency vehicles only and closed to public vehicular traffic. Signage will be installed on the old Osceola "stub" to prevent confusion with the relocation of Osceola. RECEVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO OCDTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 19 OF 36 • "UXIVIV , • Nov o s 2005 • T rte i g 1 e • • DE??FLOPMEN7 COMPANY, LLC _ _` • • • • • • • • • • • • • PLANNING DEPARTMENT Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater DOWNEROPMENT PLAN Vision of Plan ORIGINAL The Vision section of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan calls for (quotations in italics) a vibrant downtown that is mindful of its heritage, noting that the revitalization of Downtown Clearwater is critical to the City's overall success. It calls for the development of an integrated community of retail, residential, office and recreation, especially a variety of residential projects to attract new residents, this being a critical factor in the success of a revitalized Downtown. A quick perusal of the Site Plan of this development will reveal all these elements. It cannot be denied that the increase in upmarket residential units as close as these to the Downtown core signals the start of a new impetus towards the revitalization of Downtown. The developers are aware of the potential of Downtown, as shown by their confidence in property acquisition and willingness to build on the property they have acquired rather than leave it undeveloped 'as an investment'. They feel a responsibility towards their City, and a strong desire for it to grow strong, and grow strong with it. Further, the vision calls for Osceola and Fort Harrison to be redeveloped as pedestrian-oriented streets The presence and siting of the new building will strengthen this endeavor by responding at street level to create an attractive streetscape. • The Plan states that quality urban design is critical to new construction. The developers align strongly with this • statement, and feel that their contribution to the urban fabric is of highest quality. Market related forces make this a necessity. The proposed streetscape, as part of the package proposed, will also enhance the experience and vitality of • Downtown. • Additionally, the elimination of blighting conditions is critical to the future health of Downtown. Attention is drawn to the • attached photographs of the existing conditions on the site. While performing a necessary function of provision of residential housing, the proposed upgrades will go a long way to increasing not only the tax base of the City but also • encourage further economic revitalization. A cursory view of the existing conditions on the site will reveal the necessity • of this development. • Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Plan • Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living. • The proposed development will attract (and already has started to) people not only from Clearwater itself, but also from • as far away as Australia. The proximity of the facilities provided by the SandCastle Religious Retreat will account, it is believed, for a number of residents. The upmarket stores planned will further attract non-residents, who will get to know • and use downtown more and more. It will snowball. • Objective 1A: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be • consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. • This development is consistent with the spirit of the neighborhood, and will follow the directions of the Downtown • Design guidelines. • Objective IE.• A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable • employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents • Business will be encouraged to occupy the offices and stores planned along Fort Harrison, Georgia, Jones and Osceola. • Objective 1G. Residential uses in Downtown are encouraged with a variety of densities, housing types and affordability • consistent with the character districts. • This development provides residential condominiums in a range of sizes (one to four bedrooms) and a range of types (low-rise, high rise, urban street-facing units) and is wholly consistent with this Objective, and the character of this • District. It provides a higher density of housing in an area that needs an increase in population for the good of the City. • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 20 OF 36 0 • No Ti gle • • V O s 2005 ? OEV .MENT fOMVANY, LLC OR H R ' D Cl • • • • • • • is • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 a ping evttalcze owntown earwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 CI?1(OP CLE?R"!S Objective IH.• A aRt tives s hall be available to encourage redevelopment within the Downtown. This development will be one of the first to partake of the "Density Pool". GINAL Objective 11.' The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. Obviously this Objective has been more than met, with the quantity of housing to be provided. Objective 1K.• Downtown shall be a safe environment for both residents and visitors by addressing real and perceived public safety issues By removing low-quality housing, a perceived public safety threat is ameliorated. These properties have had, in the past, a fairly high traffic of public safety officer visits. Movement Goal Objective 2A: The Downtown street grid should be maintained No change is made to the street grid. Osceola Avenue is relocated, realigned and improved. The pedestrian street grid is improved with the arcades piercing the long Harrison Village block, allowing an easy flow through between Fort Harrison and Osceola. Objective 2H: A variety of parking solutions for motorized and non-motorized vehicles shall be pursued to support redevelopment while maintaining ease of access and parking throughout the Downtown. A very creative solution has been provided her with the groundbreaking use of automated valet, or "robotic" parking, a first in the County if not the State. Bicycles and their ilk have not been forgotten, and provision will be made for their safe and secure storage, with special attention being paid to the ease with which they may be accessed for use. Objective 21: Redevelopment and shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout Downtown. By upgrading the sidewalks, providing streetscaping and building something attractive to walk past, this Objective will be reinforced. See attached documents and drawings for Streetscape data. Amenity Goal Goal 3. Create Downtown as a memorable place to be enjoyed by residents and visitors that capitalizes on Clearwater's waterfront location, natural resources, built environment and history. Objective 38: The new main Library will serve as a cultural attraction and an anchor for the northern section of the downtown core. It is no coincidence that this development, which is the first residential project to be started in many years in the northern section of the downtown core, should be proposed so soon after the completion of the new Main Library. This cultural anchor, a visible show of confidence in the area, is one of the main reasons why this site and is regarded as an ideal location for new development. Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The Harrison Village buildings represent a particular building form, (multi-family, low-rise residential) which respects and enhances Downtown's character and heritage. Historical references are used in a context of modern design, forming a blend that will not look out of place in its surroundings while preserving a very specific design identity of its own. The Island View high rise continues the Mediterranean Revival design theme of the Village. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR TER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INF13 C T IAN LE DEVELOPMENT. COM 21 OF 36 .1 • 1? 3 T r 7i. g 1 e is • J DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • A vibrant downtown will be promoted by providing an ambient population who will live in and enjoy Downtown and contribute to the life in Downtown, both economically and culturally. • • Policies • Policy 1: The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. • • This project strives to be consistent and follow these excellent Guidelines. • Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. • • We believe that this project sets the Gold Standard for the Old Bay district. • Policy 3. The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. • The pedestrian environment will be enhanced by this new development. As the vision statement of the Downtown • Redevelopment Plan calls for Osceola to be regarded as a pedestrian-oriented street, the presence and siting of the new • buildings will respond at street level to create an attractive streetscape. Trees and planters will be provided and maintained, and a shelter will be provided against showers and sun along the street facades, and arcades will cross the • long Harrison Village block in two places. The buildings were set back from the street at the request of the City to • incorporate a covered walkway along the face of the retail and commercial component, and include lush landscaping (similar to that on the adjoining block on the south) and provide for extensive streetscaping. This also makes for a more • amenable environment for the dwelling units above. • Storefronts will have wide covered walkway in front of them, making it possible to traverse the entire length of the block • under cover. This will provide shelter to pedestrians, and shade storefronts against direct sunlight. This is a boon in typical Florida weather. Further drawings show how this area relates to the sidewalk and the street. • Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for • projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development • potential based on a provision of selected public amenities.. The Public Amenities Incentive Pool is the vehicle through which developers wish to increase the density and height allowances for this site, as referred to earlier. Such increases are allowable in this section of the Old Bay character • district. The provision of selected public amenities has also been referred to earlier, with the provision of streetscape • contributions and public art. • Policy 14: The education of Downtown property owners should be emphasized regarding Clearwater building and property maintenance standards Litter control and maintenance of landscaped areas shall be a priority for Downtown. • The City will maintain its properties and public infrastructure as the example for other property owners • Litter control and maintenance is vital to the continued positive perception of the development and the maintenance of • its actual and perceived value. Careful consideration has been put to the subject of solid waste, in consultation with the • Solid Waste Department. Solid waste is handled within the base of the high-rises, in a cooled, insulated roofed enclosure, with provision for recycling and cardboard disposal. • Policy 17 Property owners/developers are encouraged to meet with area neighborhood associations/business groups • prior to submitting a major redevelopment project for City review. • This is ongoing. Neighbors have been contacted on all sides, and documentation of support for this development will be • forthcoming. So far, the following have been contacted and all have voiced their approval and support. • Church of Scientology. Strong approval. RECENED • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC in • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR WATER, FL 33755 NOV 0 8 2005 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • 22 of 36 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • CITY OF CLEARWATER • • Ov"'T i\i\ 1 e • DEVELOPMENTS COMPANY, LLC ORIGINAL • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • A presentation has been made to the Downtown Development Board for the previous project and letter of strong support was received. • The Belvedere, 300 N Osceola, Board of Directors and interested residents. (Previous incarnation of this project.) • • The Curt Larson property (500 N Fort Harrison) has been acquired by Triangle Development. • Policy 18: The City shall assist neighborhoods in the formation and development of neighborhood associations that • empower residents to improve their neighborhood and strengthen ties between residents and government. • This development will form a strong component of the neighborhood association, and has a strong in interest in the maintenance of very high standards in the area. • • Policy 19. Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. • A significant portion of the site and construction budget has been set aside for such facilities. These include a clubhouse • with flexible meeting/party rooms, a music room, a media room, and a large (AAU standard 25 yard) swimming pool, hot tubs, an exercise facility with change room and showers, fountains, and lavishly landscaped garden. These facilities will • be located at the Island View portion of the site. The Harrison Village residents will have a rooftop pool, hot tub and • covered outside barbecue area, all on the roof of the building. • The Clubhouse at Island View is provided for the exclusive use of the owners at Island View. They will be able to conduct only private functions there such as parties or small weddings. Facilities provided in the Clubhouse will be • limited to a toilet, wet bar, vending machines (directed to traffic from the pool) wash-up facilities (a sink) and a warm-up • kitchen. No cooking. No renting out. • The developers fully recognize the value of lush landscaping well maintained in setting and keeping value for a property. • The motif of the palms at the Library can be echoed on the site. Elsewhere landscaping is use to break the mass of the building, and accentuate the stepbacks. • Additionally on the penthouse level of the building trellises have been designed, to be overgrown with bougainvillea or • the like to provide a softening of the roofline of the building when viewed from street level. • Policy 23: The City prefers and shall encourage alternative storm water management solutions rather than installation of • on-site stormwater retention ponds These alternatives may include neighborhood or regional stormwater programs that • make significant improvements to the overall stormwater system and environment. • Our Civil Engineer is familiar with the requirements of the City and we will comply with them. • Policy 24: The City shall give priority to sidewalk construction within Downtown that enhances pedestrian linkages and/or • completes a continuous sidewalk system on all streets • Pedestrian linkages across the site will be made by the two cross-arcades. Sidewalk reconstruction is a matter of course in this project as the developer wishes to maximize the aesthetic impact of the project by putting it in the best • surroundings possible, while meeting Streetscape standards. Extensive lush landscaping, planters, decorative railings, • new trees and palms are planned. An analogy might be made with providing a beautiful frame for a beautiful picture! • Policy 26: The CPA will consider abatement of impact fees and permit fees as an incentive for redevelopment projects that are consistent with this Plan. • The developers would welcome any abatement of fees, as we believe we are endeavoring to align with the stated goals • and objectives of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Plan wherever possible., as well as materially improving • Osceola, Jones, Georgia and Fort Harrison. • "ECRYEID • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARR15ON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 Nt IV O !{.I?00 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM P?1 5 23 ?F 36 PLANNING DEPART(WE CITY OF CLEARWAT- R • ? T r7wg 1 e 'S ORIGINAL COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Policy 27: Properties whose uses have resulted in a higher police level of service than typical properties are encouraged to redevelop with uses consistent with the applicable character district; if a higher police level of service continues, the use will be the focus of nuisance abatement strategies and law enforcement. The developers believe that the redevelopment of this area will lead to a dramatically decreased level of police service. Already the level of Police service has decreased with the demolition of the existing buildings. RECEIV ED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRIHON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO( TRIANGLEOEVELOPMENT.COM 24 OF 36 • Tri1e •_ ? DETEtOPMENTCOMPANY, LLC - _ Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater r ORIGINAL • • DOWNTOWN CHARACTER DISTRICT The lot concerned falls within the Downtown District, Old Bay Character area. The Old Bay District is a transitional area • between the Downtown Core and the low density residential areas to the north. Old Bay is comprised of a mix of land uses including governmental, residential (including single-family dwellings), commercial, industrial, institutional and • recreational. This mix, while giving the District great diversity, also results in incompatible development patterns and • uses • The developers believe the development proposed promotes the character of the Old Bay District. The uses are compatible; the site is located alongside lots with height restrictions of 100 and 150', and it forms an easy gradient from • these structures to the finer scale dwellings to the north. • District Vision • Uses • • The Old Bay District is envisioned to be a mixed-use neighborhood supporting the Downtown employment base with residential, limited neighborhood commercial and office uses A variety of densities and housing styles are encouraged • throughout the District, as well as renovations of existing older structures This District provides an opportunity for higher density residential uses along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue, provided such development is sensitive • to the established low-rise historic character of the District. The eastern frontage of Osceola Avenue may retain its • residential use, convert existing buildings to offices, redevelop with residential scale offices or combine these two uses on the same site. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • The site is located on the east side of Osceola Avenue and adds considerably to the residential use. It provides a mix of low-rise one, two and three bedroom units in an exciting urban location. A strong retail component comprising a planned ice cream store, coffee shop, DVD and video rental and the like are accessed from a sheltered arcade around and across the site. The character of the district is respected through the use of an historical (Mediterranean Revival) design theme and the smaller scale nature of the development along Osceola, as well as the retail and commercial arcade along Fort Harrison. This higher-density residential uses occur in Island View along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue, in the two towers. The eastern side of Osceola Avenue combines residential, retail and commercial facilities on the same site. Function The character of Old Bay should be strengthened through streetscape elements that identify the District as a Downtown neighborhood. As discussed above, this vision aligns exactly with the vision conceived for the site under question, especially as regards Streetscape. Development Patterns Greater heights in the higher density residential area west of Osceola Avenue may be considered. The development pattern in the balance of the District is expected to remain urban in character reflecting the low-rise scale (two to three stories) of the existing neighborhood. Renovation/restoration of existing historic homes is strongly encouraged and new development should provide references to the neighborhood's historic features in their design. Redevelopment should provide opportunities for comfortable pedestrian travel and access to public areas including the Seminole Street Launching Facility and Pinellas Trail. The proposed development forms an ideal gradient in height from the buildings to the east and south of it. A fifty-foot limit has been preserved along Osceola Avenue. Through the liberal use of setbacks, stepbacks and lowered rooflines, decks, the structure of the building has been broken up to decrease the appearance of massiveness across the entire development. R"ECEYED TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER. FL 33755 ?t??V O u ^oTEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: I NFOCO_TRI AN G LEDEVELOPMENT.COM N 2005 25 OF 36 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER •?' T r i. 1 e DEVEtOPMENTCOMPANV, LLC ORIGINAL • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • Its urban character respects and enhances Downtown's built environment and heritage. Historical references are used in a context of modern design, forming a blend that does not look out of place in its surroundings, while preserving a very specific design identity of its own. The proximity of the site to the Pinellas Trail (two blocks) means that provision will be made in the building itself for • secure bicycle and stroller storage. This is another reason the location is so good; and it means increased usage of the • Trail. • The extensive street level and cross-block arcades will enhance comfortable pedestrian travel. It must be noted that the proximity of the building to so many key locations in downtown (Library, City Hall, Publix, Steinmart and so on) mean • that the opportunity actually exists for people to walk to places and not use their vehicles. This approaches an ideal • scene for a true urban environment. • Prohibited Uses Automobile service stations, all types of vehicle sales and services, fast food restaurants with drive-through service, adult • uses, industrial and problematic uses (examples include, but are not limited to, day labor, pawn shops, check cashing and blood plasma centers and body piercing and tattoo parlors). None of these uses are planned for this site. RECHVED Downtown Design Guidelines NOV 0 8 2005 • New Construction, Parts I, II and III. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER These Guidelines have been approved by the City Council and they form a strong basis for the design of this project. The • document is very thorough and the developers believe the design of the proposed project aligns strictly with the spirit and intent of the vision of the document. Any suggestions that may be made so the developer can adhere more closely to the appropriate characteristics would be gratefully received. Brief mention will be made here of the most pertinent points. Quotations from the Guidelines are shown in italics. • Access, Circulation and Parking . Parking lots and garages should be as unobtrusive as possible while maintaining easy accessibility, Appropriate: Parking areas for townhouse developments located within the interior of the development that maintain the integrity of the primary facade as the preferred design; attached garages in residential developments, architecturally integrated with the design of the principal structure... Full details of the operation of the automatic parking garage are the subject of the accompanying White Paper. • Architecturally, the proposed design calls for an enclosed and concealed automatic parking garage in the center of the site, with the facade treatment designed to hide motor cars from any view and to disguise the use of the facility. In fact, . residential units will be built on top of the building, and false fronts will be provided to the portion on Osceola and on the Waterway side, so no trace of "garage" will be seen. The only clues to its use will be signage seen on Osceola Avenue • and entrance and exit openings for vehicles. Site Elements Buffering and Screening • Buffering and screening help define spaces, block unsightly yet necessary elements and preserve and enhance an area's quality and character Within an urban setting buffering will be achieved through the use of landscaping, decorative • fences, walls, pots, • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOPTRIANGLEOEVELOPMENT.COM • • 26 OF 36 • • Tr gle • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. LLC ORI GINAL • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater planters, etc. Appropriate: When located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment that /s integrated into the design of the . building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements; service and loading areas accessed from secondary streets, screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way and placed in visually unobtrusive • locations Mechanical equipment will be concealed on roof level, and internally or in areas of the site buffered with landscaping. Landscaping • Landscaping should be used as a design element fully integrated with a site and building while also recognizing and • defining the urban setting. A well-designed landscape contributes to the site's aesthetics and improves the livability in a • dense urban environment. Landscaping can also preserve and enhance the acoustic and visual privacy of a site while supporting and accentuating the architecture of a building. The use of indigenous species and other water-saving • techniques are encouraged. • Appropriate: Landscaping compatible with the climatic conditions of West Central Florida that includes the use of native 0 plant species and Xerlscape landscape techniques; Landscape design which enhances and supports architectural features of the building/site where located; Landscape design that visually screens unsightly views, strengthens important vistas • and reinforces the character district /n which it /s located; Plantings /n landscape beds, planters or pots that soften the edges between buildings and pedestrian areas, Trees planted in paved areas provided with adequate room to grow • (landscape beds, tree grates or other protective techniques). Appropriate and full landscaping is an important element of the design. See attached Landscape Plan. • • Fences and Walls • Fences and walls shall be utilized around service/loading areas, dumpsters and mechanical/utility equipment to buffer these uses from surrounding properties and rights of-way and to provide security for this equipment. The service areas are largely internal in this development. • Fences and walls may be incorporated as a design element to assist in defining property boundaries and entrances, open • spaces and to provide a transition between public and private realms • Appropriate: Fences and walls that complement and are consistent with the principal structure with regards to materials, • texture, size, shape and color. • In most cases the buildings themselves form the wall to the development of Harrison Village. An appropriate fence is • planned for Island View. • II. BUILDING PLACEMENT Orientation Buildings should be oriented towards the street. The orientation of the front facade of buildings along the streetscape contributes to pedestrian interest in an area. A high percentage of ground coverage is encouraged in a downtown to create a critical mass of activity. • See Site Plan. Buildings take a very urban stance towards the surrounding streets, especially Fort Harrison, with the • retail and commercial component orienting towards this busy thoroughfare. III. BUILDING DESIGN • Successful building design is a marriage between form and architecture to visually connect with the existing and/or desired character of the surrounding area. A compatible structure /s one that possesses patterns of form and • architecture that are found in surrounding buildings creating 'points of agreement" between the e • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY' LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR WATER, FL 33755 • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM N1 11V 0 J o 2005 0 IY1 1.j J 0 27 OF 36 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 CiN OF CLEARWATER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Try g 1 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • ORIGINAL individuality of the building. Quality urban design balances a respect for an area's existing or desired pattern with the design of new structures Appropriate: Buildings that have a distinct 'base ; "middle"and "cap",* Low-rise buildings and/or those with long facade widths that accentuate vertical elements such as entrances and columns, or by breaking up the facade plane into a greater number of smaller vertical masses; Mid- and high-rise buildings that utilize horizontal elements that minimize the apparent height of a building such as balconies, banding, cornice and parapet lines, etc. These architectural tricks are used in full to break up a larger building into more comprehensible masses, with horizontal divisions to minimize height, and vertically to make the building even more urban in scale. The development is broken down into finer detail by porticoes which announce and celebrate "entrance", clock towers on the busiest corners and pediments which refer to traditional symbols of residence. The buildings have a very definite division into base, middle and cap. Architecture The architectural style of new development or development should be consistent with the desired development in the surrounding Character Districts:.. A variety of architectural styles exist within the Downtown and the Guidelines should not prescribe any one architectural style as being the most appropriate. New buildings may use a variety of architectural styles as appropriate to the intended use of the building and the context of the surrounding area. New design may use contemporary materials to adapt historic design elements into a new building. Various architectural elements that may be found on a building 1 - Cornice 91 12 2 - Lintel AK 3-Sill o 4 - String course 5 -Transom 6 - Bulk heads El 7 - Kick plates 4*4 8 - Double door entrance 9 - Fixed plate glass display window 10 - Double-hung sash window 11 - Parapet 12 - Parapet coping All the appropriate elements referred to above are used in this design. Facade Design All facades of a building should reflect a unified architectural treatment; however, there is a hierarchy of facade treatment based on location, function and level of pedestrian interaction. Facades should use a combination of architectural details, materials, window and door patterns and other design features to form a cohesive and visually interesting design. The proposed buildings, both on Island View and Harrison Village, have hierarchies of facades. Primary and Corner Facades Buildings on corner lots at the intersections of streets designated on the Master Streetscape Plan are considered to have two primary facades and should receive the highest level of design treatment on those facades Appropriate. The primary facades as the most highly designed facade utilizing the following elements: A change in plane, building wall projection or recess, architectural details, variety in color, material, texture, doors and/or windows; an architecturally prominent entrance with door located on the primary facade. This has been complied with in this proposal. RECEIVED TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, r-LEARWATER, FL 33755 ??) O O o ?oo[ TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: N. nO TRIAN G L EOEVELOPMENT.COM fy J 2a OF 36 e PLANNING DEPARTMENT CAN OF CLEARWA?ER • NOV o 8 2005 • r T r i. g l e • ORIGINAL • -_ DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • PLANNING DE?PApRTMENT Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • Prltlt, l 3} ?1fPra?c' N? an through the use of a combination of- projection or recession in the building footprint, variation in building height, canopy or portico; raised cornice or parapet over door.. This has been complied with in this proposal. • • Primary facade, in keeping with established patterns, which include three articulated architectural parts: a base, middle and cap. The proportion of these three elements will vary depending on the scale of the building. • This has been complied with in this proposal. • • Major architectural treatments on the principal building facade that are continued around all sides of the building that are visible from the public realm. Buildings on corner lots that emphasize their prominent location through the use of • additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. • This has been complied with on this proposal, with corners of the Harrison Village site being articulated by a special unit • wit an octagonal deck on the corner. These clock towers have been located to provide landmarks for the development. The corner location on the Island View site is also one of the entrances, so has had special attention put on it in design. • • Secondary Facades • A secondary facade faces alleys, parking areas and Old Bay district properties along Clearwater Harbor. The level of design along a secondary facade, while perhaps not as intense as a primary facade should continue the architectural • style of the building and use the same quality of materials • On Island View the waterfront face of the building will receive the same level of detailing as the others. There are no • secondary facades at Harrison Village. • • Windows and Doors Windows are a vital element which link the private (space within a building) and public space (such as streets, sidewalks, etc.) realms visually drawing passersby into buildings Doors are also a vital element providing not only visual but, • physical connections between the public and private realms At street level, for the entire length and breadth of Harrison Village, and in its arcades, pedestrians will enjoy visual and • physical access into the building through storefronts and windows on the retail and commercial component. Along the Osceola portion of Harrison Village, the pedestrian experience will be a friendly one. Osceola Avenue will become a • pleasant tree-shaded street to stroll. Lush landscaping, planters and railings will separate public and private spaces. • Roof Design • Roof forms are one of the most highly visible components of a building. Not only do they provide a vital function but • they contribute and are integral to the overall building design through the use of distinctive, defined styles and • decorative patterns and colors. The style of the development, Mediterranean Revival, calls for smaller mansard roofs and trellises as well as pediments, and these are use to break the scale of the building by providing roof lines at varying heights across the facade. Other Architectural Features • A variety of other features can provide the perfect accent or finish to a building or, conversely, ruin an otherwise wonderful structure. These may include door handles and hinges, mail slots, clocks, fir%mergency escapes, shutters, • awnings etc. The same amount of thought and care should be put into the selection and installation of these features as • for more obvious features such as roofs, doors and windows • All the above are featured in the proposed development. Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes and the like will be handled within the parameters of the Downtown Design Guidelines. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARI/? TER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: IN FO IU/TRIANOLE DEVELOPMENT. COM • • 29 OF 36 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • wry ` ORIGINAL ,. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Materials and Color Materials The correct choices of building materials are paramount in the success of any building. Materials should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building to which they belong. The building is will be constructed in concrete masonry units with a stucco finish. Stucco banding, cornices and window detailing will be used. Relief and contrast from this texture will occur in windows and trellises which have a smoother finish. All surfaces will be painted or self-colored stone. The base of the building will be finished to emulate courses of stone blocks. Color The color palette of a building is composed of the colors of the main body of the building, trim and accent colors The colors chosen for awnings, canopies, shutters and roofs also contribute to the overall color scheme of building. The overall color scheme of a building or project should reflect a cohesive pattern. These guidelines recognize that the review of a building's color scheme is a balance between an owner's creativity and individuality, the architectural style of the building and an overall harmonious vision for the Downtown. The use ofa single color on all surfaces should be avoided. A two- or three-color scheme is encouraged to provide visual appeal. The main body color should be the predominant color of the building. The color tone of the main body should be guided by the size and height of the building, its location (corner or interior lot), and architectural style. The trim color is applied to architectural elements such as windows, doors, columns, porches etc. The trim color should be a lighter or darker tone of the main body color, a complimentary color to the main body color or a neutral color. In a three-color scheme, the accent color should be used sparingly to highlight certain architectural elements such as a front door or awning. The color scheme is conceived as basically a three-color scheme with tones of terracotta, cream, ochre and mustard, offset by accents of deeper hue. Lighter tones will be used to accentuate advancing planes with the color tone becoming progressively stronger on the building planes away from the street. The entrance porticoes will signal their function and • importance with the strongest, or most contrasting color. Window and doorframes will be darker. Pediments and parapets will be the lightest color to outline the building against the sky. Contrasting color awnings will provide accent • points. Trellises will be a lighter color to set off the greenery growing over them. The base of the building will have a finish of contrasting three-dimensional colored banding which will have the appearance of horizontal stone coursing (blocks). • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • RECEVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARW/?ATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOIU!TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 30 OF 36 'qq Tr l g l e ? DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Existing Conditions (Already demolished structures noted) ]ones from Osceola to Fort Fort Harrison looking west north 31 OF 36 Georgia Street, north side of Harrison Village and Island View Tr1 9 1 e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater North Osceola Avenue looking east W ,.,., RECErV6E'D ?pS1NINGDEP W JER cmoF60 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 32 OF 36 North Osceola Avenue looking west • Trig gle • DFVFI.OPMFNT CC) M PANV, t.LC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater 4 f RECEIV ED NOV o s 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FOR'i HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFD(?DTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 33 OF 36 Locality Plan (Aerial photograph with project overlay) • +Tr`i g 1e • DEVfLpPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ter ORIGINAL Special Note on Traffic RECEIV ED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DER4RTMEW CITY OF CIEARWATER TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR WATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: IN FOC?TRI ANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 34 OF 36 September 28, 2005 Mr. Bennet Elbo City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Division 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, F133756 RE: Harrison Village - Island View Dear Mr. Elbo: On July 19, 2005 the CDB approved Harrison Village-Island View for 324 condominiumhownhouse units and 18,893 square feet of specialty retail. (FLD 2005- 04034) The traffic analysis submitted in April 2005 with that application predicted the project would generate 175 PM peak hour trips. The applicant is resubmitting to increase the specialty retail to 27,000 square feet, in addition to the 324 condominium units. The corresponding trip generation would increase to 194 PM peak hour trips, which is only a 19 trip increase over the approved plan. We are requesting a waiver to preparing a new traffic study for this application due to the minimal change in traffic generation. In addition, Fort Harrison Avenue is operating at LOS C. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, f Robert Pergolizzi, CP Principal Cc Don Stanish Thomas Coates 04-055 RECEIVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ? Tri l ? g e Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL Attachment A Street Addresses and Parcel Numbers HARRISON VILLAGE Common Name Street Address Former Markopoulos property 400, 410 Jones Street and 303 N Osceola Avenue Former Salvation Army 410 N Fort Harrison and 309 N Osceola Avenue ISLAND VIEW Former Osceola Bay property Former Rahddert property 302, 304, 308 N Osceola Avenue 312, 314, 400,404 N Osceola Avenue Letter Clarifying Ownership Proof of Ownership Island View (Old Osceola Bay, 302-308 N Osceola) Special Warranty Deed Proof of Ownership Island View (Old Rahddert property, 312-404 N Osceola) Agreement of purchase Proof of Ownership Harrison Village (Old Markopoulos property) Bill of Sale Proof of Ownership Harrison Village (Old Salvation Army site) Title Information (HUD Settlement Statement) Parcel Numbers 09/29/15/ 44352/ 002/ 0012 -/09/29/15/ 44352/ 002/ 0010 09/29/15/ 44352/ 002/ 0020 ,/09/29/15/ 14310/ 000/ 0010 -109/29/15/ 00000/ 430/ 0300 /09/29/15/ ,/09/29/15/ ,/()9/29/15/ 109/29/15/ -/09/29/15/ 09/29/15/ 09/29/15/ 53370/ 53370/ 00000/ 00000/ 00000/ 14310/ 14310/ 000/ 0010 000/ 0020 430/ 0600 430/ 0500 430/ 0400 000/ 0100 000/ 0080 RECEIV.ED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(O)TRIANOLE DEVELOPMENT. COM 36 OF 36 • • ! • • • • • w • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I - d 0 ORIGINAL September 26, 2005 City of Clearwater This letter is to clarify the intent with, regards to certain properties owned by Triangle Old Bay Holdings LLC ("Old Bay") and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Old Bay's niaJority owner is Ron Pollack, and it is managed by Triangle Property Holding LLC, which is Jointly owned by Ron Pollack and Ben Kugler. Specifically at this time the property parcels marked below as 1, 2, 10 & 4 are being developed. The thin strip of land dividing 4 in two is the proposed new Osceola Ave, which we plan to dedicate to the city. Properties 1, 2, 10 and the part of property 4 west of the new Osceola Ave will be deeded to Island View Condominiums. Data on properties being developed by Triangle Old Ray Holdings: c i a ,.?/. twCCS&'Va?B?Cf' ?F ,f S629-SZL-LZL E V E V E? T to 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CIEARWATER SIAoeliod d61:90 SO 9d des • ,'1 URIGINAL Old Bay is using Triangle Development Company LLC (also jointly owned by Ron Pollack and Ben Kugler) to develop its properties. Ownership information: The data on the relevant properties shown above are as follows: 1. Name: former Rhaddert property: 310-404 N. Osceola. Size: 1.9 acres Owner: Georgia Street Properties LLC (wholly owned by Old Bay). 2. Name: former Ellenbera property: 302-308 N. Osceola. Size: 1.0 acres Owner: Island View Properties LLC (wholly owned by Old Bay). 4. Name: former Salvation Army property : (part of what was once) 300-410 N. Fort Harrison, and 309-407 N. Osceola. Size: 2.42 acres Owner: Triangle S.A. Land LLC (wholly owned by Old Bay). 10. Name: former Mareopoulos property: (part of what was once) 303&305 N'_ Osceola, and 400&410 Jones St. Size: 0.2 acres Owner: Harrison Village Properties LLC (wholly owned by Old Bay). Sincerely, ti Ron Pollack CEO and Manager Triangle Development Company LLC For: Triangle Property Holdings LLC, Manager For: Triangle Old Bay Holdings, Owner RECEIVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEARWATERT C11Y OF C 2-d SE2S-92L-L2L s.moeiiod dt,1=90 SO 92 daS • $27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $19250.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC6 • u oa _.. ! ?144, A • , :Prgpared By and Return To: • Lynette Rushton Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 55$0 W. Cypress Street, Suite #E • Tampa, FL 33607 • File No. 04-054-1402870 Property Appraiser's Parcel I.D. (folio) Number (s) • 09/29/15/00000/430/0600 • SS#. ORIGINAL • SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED • THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED made this June 9, 2004, by Osceola Bay Development, LLC, a Nevada Limited • Liability Company hereinafter called the grantor and 302-308 N. Osceola Properties, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose post office address is 133 Candy Lane , Palm Harbor, Florida 34683, hereinafter called the grantee: • (Wherever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to the instrument and • the heirs, legal representative and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of • corporations) ! WITNESSETH: That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable consideration, • receipt, whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situated in Pinellas County, Florida viz: • See Legal Description Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. • Subject to encumbrances, easements and restrictions of record and taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2003. • • TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any wise appertaining. • ! TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. • AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said • land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the said grantor. • • • • Special Warranty Deed (Corporation) • R-1 l 2102)(6PCOrp.111Pd1 EMECEVED Nov 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 1 of 2 i s 41 ORIGINAL IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, and its corporate seat to be hereunto affixed, by its proper officers duly authorized, the day and year first above written. ATTEST: ign sealed d Bred ' the presence of: itness Sig ature o G C'' (ZIAC Y 'tales rin Name Witness Signature d /?. o Witness Printed Name STATE OF /l4D,4 / COUNTY OF f7 ?LL?S +Roe? uqA Osceola Bay Development, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company By: Matrix Lodging, L.L.C., a Nevada ny, as its limited liability cTr Managing MembBy: Ellenburg Fa LLC, a Florida limited liabilitpany "Sy: Gerald D. 8 S Fort Harrison Ave., , , FL 33756 CAR Q BAW W COMMISSION 0 DD 287200 eAd EXPIRES: May S. 2008 ea,dryMnw. I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly autho ized in the County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally lappeyed S Q L? and in the to me known to be the R 6 67 "41 w- respectively of the corporation named as the grantor in the foregoing deed, or who have produced as Identification and that they severally acknowledged executing the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and voluntarily under the authority duly vested in them by said corporation and that the seal affixed thereto is the true corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State ?ECLONIED Nov 0 8 2005 day of u .vim 2zV I/ Notary Public .(gyp j _ ccCS ?}.?'OZ Printed Name of Notary PLANNING DEPARTMENT speGal war?xrty Deed (?rpo,atlo?t Page 2 of 2 Rev.t,VOUSPrn P-pd) C11y OF CLEARWATE • ORIGINAL • • ... - ..._. .: •-.[.::::.: -_.. ,,.... ,-_. _.. ..,. :. _ , • -ii`'):. !_,'r?i Lil-_. =; ..;' ?!!-'' -...!f!:_ f:i.'!-f::::E% L_'i 'ii!;, CAI :?, • :.'=-:_i ?. :!_'. .... !_ ..?!_ ?__=._i -1'i_!!_ s -..: :' „ M1 ? j • • • • • • • • • • • • • • RECEIVED • Nov o 8 2005 • pLpNNING DEPARNA ART • Cily OF CLEAR w • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ORIGINAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT ~A" Parcel : Lots A and B of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 76. Public Records of Pinellas County. Floridh. Together with all submerged lands, bay bottoms, and riparian rights thereunto appertaining or in anywise belonging, more panicularly'described as follows: • Begin at the Northwc% comer of CLOVIS C. LUTZ-SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat . Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pincllas County, Florida, and run thence S. 12 degrees 06' 16" W. along the Westerly line oes.aid Subdivision 65.48 feet to the southwest comer of said • , Subdivision;. thence S 89 degrees 54' 00" W 630,0 feet more or less to the Easterly boundary of n th h l i Cl B h e c a ne n earwater ay; t ence Northerly, along the Easterly bo4ndary of said ehtianel, to • an intersection with the Westerly =cnsien of the Northerly line of said CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION; thence Easterly, along the Westerly extension of the said Northerly line, 637.0 • feet more or less to the point of beginning. The above described property is subject to an casement to the West Coast Inland Navigation District on that part lying within 250 feet of the • center line of the West Coast Intracoastal Wateiway Canal, containing 0.; acre more or less. • That part of a certain (10) feet of unnamed alley extending West to the waters of • Clearwater Harbor from the West right-of-way of Osceola Avenue and lying south of-the Freiler property and lying North of Lot A ofCLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION its*rccordcd in Plat • Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. Said alley having been vacated by the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida, and being the same property as shown on Quit Claim Deed from A.K. Freiler and Sarah May Freiler, his Wife, in OR. 589, page 289. -Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida • A parcel of submerged land in Clearwater Harbor in Section 9, Township 29 South. • Range 15 Fast, Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: • Begin at the Northwest comer of Lot A of the CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as • recorded in Plat Book 35. Page 76, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, said point being on the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor, said Paint of Beginning being 555.97 feet • North and 1949.66 feet West of the Southeast corner of said Section 9. From aforesaid P.O.B. nut thence N 89 degrees 24' 16" W 282.41 feet to the City of Clcarwata Bulkhead Line; thencc • nun N 07 degrees 28' 50" East 10.07 feet.along said Bulkhead Line; run thence Somh 99 degrees " 2416 East 28121 feet to the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor, run thence South 00 • degrees 38'06" West 10.00 feet along-said average high water line to the P.O.B. • rcei I: From the Southwest comer of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of • Section 9. Township 29 South, Range 15 East; run West 398.68 feet to the West line of Osceola Avenue; thence North 0 degrees 38' Fast along the West line of Osceola Avenue 545.68 feet to the North line of an alley as shown in JONES SUBDIVISION to the Town of Clearwater. • Florida: thence East 58.0 feet to Point of Beginning; thence North 83.16 feet more or less; thence West 250.55feet. more or less, to the waters of Clearwater Bay; thence South 22.5 deg. West 90.01 feet more or less to a point 285 feet West of the Point of Beginning; thence East 285.0 feet • to Point of Beginning. Together with all submerged land and riparian rights appurtenant to said tmet described as follows: • Tract 23, from an intersection of the North iirre of Jones Street and the west line of Osceola Avenue of JONES SUBDIVISION in Clearwater. Florida; tun North along West line of Osceola Avenue 1901-ect: thence West 213.9 feet to ovewc high water line ofClcarwater Bay to Point of Beginnin : thenc l i 725 f t t Cl B h h h g e earwater anne n ee o c ay; t ence Nort easterly along Fast side of • channel a distance of 83.17 feet due Nonh. thence East 725 fees to average high water line of Clearwater Bay; thence in a southwesterly course along the average high water line to Point of Beginning. LESS that portion described in that certain Order for Taking filed 1-13-61 in O.R. B k 108 3 9 oo . page 7, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. 'ECEVED • Nov 0 8 2005 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • • 0 ORIGINAL • NE _ REIDEt'Jf it it A JL _ _i l!r_1 t41 =; C!SCEf _j L( PROPERTIES LL._-: • 'J2. i.:_,. CANDY LN • i u PALM HARSQR. • T; FL -4,:5 54-1. Count Tw • 4) Ger,ior Yr. CISCEOLri AVE I`,! Use Codf_:--s: Esc- Pet4 = PARTNERSH I PE=: ETC Light Dist: Anne:: D i t : T a:; Am 2) 0- r,4 Dist . CW C! , ?E.E - Spec Dist)): •` If !1cj L. -lp: g38,B ? VALUE Exempt, ions Area: Et,.? If No E;;1=m. • ?(st . X. (_; Paid Date: 3 , WX. % Pct: 0(-? .(?cc 7 Mill • =_=esatad ,? Ca.Q: J. CI qCC?C DX. U Pct- .(D()(j Tti+.>. Dlq: TX ( i 1; P;. 4- vij if Tax Note- 141 ° 41 5?C?gr,r?i? AX: (_? In=1 x. . SR: Y: 412 ' • PP'. INTER EC '- R!144 GEDR.GIA L4 P, /W OSCE OLD=i A'''E , ' TH Appr Area.: ?C? IS T *?* EX EGPL - •7 P. j, (' -? nR POB TH S ` i 70FT i =4FT TH W 2 . E3 TO 110 RE L • • • • • • • • • • • • RECE I V ED N WM ?? Nov 0 8 2005 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • • • ORIGINAL • ?. r-idclr , -J- T P- 1-1 H • 4 77. a (_i l_!i_li_l f_t l_:1LJI 1 r' .a. i Ild D 1 t e- v 1-11,J (_I f II_J? I li'/-'?? .I. n -- v'Jo `!1. f-i Ta.. Note. J=ti:''J:} e X41. y i 1 _:;1;_ - 'rJ t_) UL I E.,--, Gli pj t i l_] t"I ;-'1=_ • - ' = _ - - S 2 4 f a l:) '5 4 U, F, c P 4- 5 4 T n, Y LH"NE" DEED • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • w • • • RECEIVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • PARC EL A LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11 & ALL 8, A.B. & JENNIE CATES PAGE 64 OF THE PUBLIC TOGETHER WITH: IS ORIGINAL OF GEORGIA STREET LYING NORTH OF SAID LOT SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARC EL B BEGINNING WHERE THE WEST LINE OF NORTH OSCEOLA STREET, IN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, OR THE WEST LINE OF SAID STREET EXTENDED NORTH AS SAID NORTH OSCEOLA STREET EXISTED ON OCTOBER 8, 1894, INTERSECTS THE SOUTH LINE OF A THREE ACRE TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY OWNED BY MARY C. NICHOLSON, WHICH SAID TRACT IS DESCRIBED AS (BEGINNING 17.85 CHAINS WEST AND 8.28 CHAINS NORTH OF THE S.E. CORNER OF SEC. 9, TWP. 29 S., RANGE 15 E, THENCE NORTH 2.52 CHAINS TO A STAKE, THENCE RUN WEST 11.40 CHAINS TO A STAKE, AT LOW WATER MARK ON CLEARWATER BAY, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE MEANDERINGS OF SAID BAY 2.75 CHAINS MORE OR LESS TO A POINT DUE WEST OF THE STARTING; THENCE EAST 12.40 CHAINS MORE OR LESS TO A POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 3 ACRES MORE OR LESS; THENCE RUN EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NICHOLSON TRACT 58 FT. FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 84 FT., THENCE EAST 70 FT., THENCE SOUTH 84 FT., THENCE EAST 70 FT., THENCE SOUTH 84 FT., THENCE WEST 70 FT. TO POINT OF BEGINNING, IT BEING THE INTENTION HEREBY TO CONVEY THE LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY J.E. ELDRIDGE TO JAMES E. BEARING AND ROSE B. SCARLING BY DEED DATED APRIL 10, 1922, FILED SAME DATE, AND RECORDED IN DEED RECORD 116, PAGE 67, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARC EL C ALSO, BEGIN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND HERETOFORE DESCRIBED AND HEREBY CONVEYED, RUN THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT 37 FEET 6 INCHES FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT WESTERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT, THENCE SOUTHE 7 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO POINT OF BEGINNING, BEING A TRIANGULAR PIECE OF LAND, IT BEING THE INTENTION BY THIS DESCRIPTION TO CONVEY THAT CERTAIN SMALL TRIANGULAR PARCEL OF LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER TO JAMES B. SCARING BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 13, 1922, FILED DECEMBER 14, 1922, RECORDED IN DEED RECORD 133, PAGE 483, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. RECHVED TOGETHER WITH. NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 ORIGINAL PARC EL D BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, COUNTY OF PINELLAS, STATE OF FLORIDA, WHERE THE WEST LINE OF OSC EOLA AVENUE INTERSECTS THE SOUTH LINE OF GEORGIA STREET; RUN THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE 200 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT ELEVEN (11), OF CATES SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE 49 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE OLD JOHN E. LAMBETH PROPERTY, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID LAMBETH LINE TO THE HIGH WATER MARK ON CLEARWATER BAY, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID HIGH WATER MARK TO SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) OF SAID CATES' SUBDIVISION. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH: PARC EL E THOSE SUBMERGED LANDS DESCRIBED IN OR BOOKS 3515, PAGE 221, OR 3557, PAGE 559 AND OR 1324, PAGE 520 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. RECEIVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER '4305 BILL OF SALE OR I G I NA L I • Sale and Transfer of Assets and Contract Rights. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and as contemplated by Section 5(b) of that certain Commercial Contract entered on or about January 26, 2004 (the "Sale Agreement"), to which Antonios Markopoulos, Gulfview Restaurant, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Zeus Inn, Inc., a Florida corporation (individually and collectively, the "Seller"), and Osceola-Jones Properties LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the "Purchaser"), are parties, Seller hereby sells, transfers, assigns, conveys, grants and delivers to Purchaser, effective as of April 14, 2004 (the "Closing Date"), all of each Seller's right, title and interest in and to all of the assets of each respective Seller (the "Assets") located at or on that real property described on Exhibit A hereto, ?,, ,- C-e t`?,Vt res?-:.cr- etLe&,P y ny- 0P ???r-- 3tik,Ck Salk,- -iAXII by ;4 He i Ea??vcti-ti. a•+-- y- v- ,rya pr?7p&-r- 2. Further Actions. Seller and Purchaser agree to take all steps reasonably necessary to establish the record of Purchaser's title to the Assets and, at the request of Purchaser, to execute and deliver further instruments of transfer and assignment and take such other action as Purchaser may reasonably request to more effectively transfer and assign to and vest in Purchaser each of the Assets, all at the sole cost and expense of Seller. ?. Miscellaneous. 3.1. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be solely governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of Florida without regard to any principles of conflict of laws. The Seller and the Purchaser agree that venue of all lawsuits, disputes or actions involving or relating to this Bill of Sale or its interpretation or enforcement shall lie in courts having jurisdiction within Pinellas County, Florida, and federal courts having jurisdiction within the Middle District of Florida, and each party agrees to submit to the jurisdiction of said courts. 3.2. Headings for Reference Only. The section and paragraph headings in this Bill of Sale are for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or limit the provisions of this Bill of Sale or affect the meaning or be used in interpretation of this Bill of Sale. ? -t,\i S l c l l °? ?? n U C?"1 D ?' EVED K E U` NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 ORIGINAL 3.3. Authority. By execution of this Bill of Sale, each person represents and warrants his right, ability and authority to sign and bind his principal to all terms and provisions of this Bill of Sale, and each parry may fully rely thereon without verification. ESS WHEREOF, Seller has executed this Bill of Sale as of April 14, 2004. 3tonios oMarkopoul6-S GULF ST URANT, INC. By: Antonios arkopoulos, President By: ZEMaAntonios C. r kopoulos, , President AS'? c ri e-J 46 I? ?n ?, Ce'o RECEIVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ® • ORIGINAL PARCEL #1: Exhibit "An The West 2/3 of Lot 2, Block 2. JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, according to the plat thereof as rscorded In Plat Book 1, page.13, of the public records of HIliaborough County. Florida of which Pinellas County was formerly a part of, LESS the Northwest comer and being more particular y described as failows: Heglnning at the Southwest comer of Lot 2, flock 2, of said JONES SUBDIVISION for a Point of Beginning; thence North 00 ° 23'0[' West, along the west tine of said Lot 2,169.80 feet: thence Northeasterly along a curve (said curve having a radius of 45.00 feet a tangent of 8.07fwt a chord of 15.88 feet, a chord bearing North 490 42'4W Ee-A, a dish of 1 SJ% feet; thence North 890 41'08' East„ along the North line of said Lot 2.41.77 feet; thence South oo a =W East, 180.00 feet; thenceSouth 890 4i'W W6;t; 5395 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL #2: The South 76 feet of Lot 1, Block 2. JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, according to the plot thereof recorded In Plat Book i, page 13, of the public records of Hftborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formedy a part together with that certain tract of land lying between the West fine of the above described land and the East right-of-way line of Osceola Avenue, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida. PARCEL #3: Beginning at the Southeast comer of Lot 1, Block 2, of JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOL.SON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, according to the corrected map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 1, page 13. of the public records of Hillsborough County, Florida, elf which Pineffas County was formerly a park nm thence North 00 23W West, along the East One of said Lot 1,157 feet for a Polar of Heginning; thence South 79° 24'06' West, 8028 feet;, thence South 00 44W West 12.21 That thence Fast, parallel to the South line of said lot 79.25 That more or lest, to the East line of said lot, thence North along the Fast line of said lot, 27 That more or less. to the Point of Beginning. U "ECEYED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER A. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSIN URBAN D E VELOPMENT B. T Y P OF LOAN W SETTLEMENT MENT 1 ? FHA FMHA 3 ® CONV UNINS Astro Title Services, h ic . 510 N. Fort Harrison Aven ue <. ? VA 5. ? CONV. INS. Clearwater Florida 3375 6. FILE NUMBER: 7. LOAN NUMBER , 7681-PI-04 B MORTOAOEINS. CASE NO. n/a C. NOTE: This form is furnished to give you a stateme ' ' it f actual settlement costs. Amounts paid to and by the settlement agent are shown. Items marked (p.o.c.) were paid outside the closing; the re shown here for informational purposes and are not included in the totals. 0. NAME OF BORROWER: Triangle S.A. Land, LLC Limited Liability Co. Registration no. ADDRESSOFBORROWER: L)5000077223 305 N. Ft Harrison Aven Clearwater, Florida 33755 E. NAME OF SELLER: The Salvation Army a Ge r is Corporation ADDRESSOF SELLER: 1625 Belcher Road North, C learwater, FL 33757 ORIGI F. NAME OF LENDER: SunTrust Bank. NA ADDRESSOF LENDER: 401 E. Jackson Street Tampa, FL 33602 G. PROPERTY LOCATION: 309 Osceola Avenue and 4 1 N. Ft. Harrison Ave Clearwater, Florida 3375 H. SETTLEMENT AGENT: Astro Title Services, Inc. PLACE OF SETTLEMENT: 510 N. Fort Harrison Avet Ili. e Clearwater, Florida 33755 1. SETTLEMENT DATE: August 31, 2005 J. SUMMARY OF BORROWER'S TRANSA CTION K. SUMMARY OF SELLER'S TRANS ACTION 1fl0; G.AQS? irAAd..I?NT.fJUI» Ft?ti&i. ?k.13t?Q1HER; 101. Contract sales price 2 U U, 0.00. 00 401.'Contract salesprlce 2, 600,.000.00 102. Personal property 402. Personal property 103. Settlement charges to borrower: 403. (from line 1400) L 2 7 . , 195.25 104. 404, 105. 405. ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS PAID BY SELLER IN A DVAN ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS PAID BY SELLER IN ADVANCE: 106. City/town taxes to 466. City/town taxes to 107. County taxes to 407. County taxes to 108. Assessments to 408. Assessments to 109. 409, 110. 410. 111. 411. 112. 412. 120. GROSS AMOUNT DUE FROM BORROWER: ? 2,7 2 195.25 420. GROSS AMOUNT DUE TO SELLER: ? 2, 600, 000.00 200. AMOUNTS.PAIB BY,! Wi BEHALT OF.BORROVY ER: REDUCTIONS IN AMOUNT DUE TO SELLER: 201. Deposit or earnest money 5 , 000.00 501. Excess deposit (see instructions) 500, 000.00 202. Principal amount of new loan(s) 1., 9 ., ., 500:.00 502: Settlement charges to seller (line 1400) 26 025. 00 203. Existing loan(s) taken subject to 503. Existing loan(s) taken subject to 264. 504: Payoff of first mortgage loan 205. 505. Payoff of second mortgage loan 206. 506: .. .. 207. 507. 208.. 508.. 09. 1 NEC ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS UNPAID BY SELLER: ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS UNPAID BY SELLER: {\ 210. City/town taxes to 510. City/town taxes to `/ 211. County taxes to 511. County taxes to 212. Assessments to 512. Assessments to ?0 Y 213. 513. 214. 514. /? A PLANNING 215. 515. 216. 516. f IN OF I 217. - 517. v , 1 218. 516. 219. 519. Z20. TOTAL PAID BY/FOR 5 20. TOTAL REDUCTIONS BORROWER: ? 2,45 7 ,500.00 IN AMOUNT DUE TO SELLER: ? 526, 025.00 Xro. CASH AT sETTI-WENT-,FROM/TO _BORROWER: ° 6 W, CASH AT SETTLEMttlT TO/FROM SELLER- 101. Gross amount due from borrower (line 120) 2,72 7 ,195.25 6 01. Gross amount due to seller (line 420) 2, bUO, 000.00 102. Less amount paid by/for borrower (line 220) ( 2, 45 7 , 500.00) 6 02. Less total reductions in amount due seller (line 520, ( 526, 025.00) 103. CASH (® FROM) (? TO) BORROWER: ? 26 9 , 695.25 6 03. CASH ( ® TO) ( E] FROM) SELLER: ? 2 , 073, 975.00 orm No PTS HUDI w HUD-1 (3-86) )MB No 2502.0265 RESPA, HB 4305.2 ?y PAGE 1 S L VED 0 8 2005 DEPARTMENT ,'LEARWATER L SETTLEMENT CHARGES 700. TOTAL SALES/BROKER'S COMMISSI PAID FROM PAID FROM UtVI$IOfI OF COMMIS.fdt 7b0)'AS F.{}I LQVJ$; BORROWER'S SELLER'S 701. $ to FUNDS FUNDS 702. $ to AT AT 703. Commission paid at settlement SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT 704. Commission 6.5%,$2,000,000.00 to Remax Action First(less$30 000 00 , . ) 100, 000.00 801. Loan Origination fee % 802. Loan Discount % 803. Appraisal Fee o: 804. Credit Report to: ORIGI 805. Lender's Inspection fee' NAL 8 06. Mortgage Insurance application fee to 807. Assumption fee 808. Loan Fee to SunTrust Bank NA 809. Flood Certification to SunTrust Bank NA 9,787.50 810. 14.00 811. t3 N . 901. Interest from to ® $ Q /day 902. Mortgage insurance premium for mo. to 903. Hazard insurance premium for 12 mo. to 904 Flood Insurance Premwm for ]2 mo to 905 FECEYED Y0o0 :'E3E5ERV?SD1 POSITED W1TH I ENUFR 1001. Hazard insurance months 0 $ per month 1002. Mortgage insurance months @ $ per month NOV 0 Q 2005 NO V 1003, City property taxes months @ $ per month ll V Y 1004. County property taxes months ® $ per month 1005. Annual assessments` months. ®!$ per month p+ (? f? PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1006. months 6 $ per month 1007. months (? $ per month CITY OF CLEARWATER 1008. months @ $ per month 1009. ' - .. .: lftitl 7}TLE t:HAitGES .. 1101. Settlement or closing fee to Astro Title Services Inc , . 1102. Abstract or title search to Stewart Title 150.00 100.00 1103. Title examination to Astro Title Services Inc. 275.00 , 1104. Title insurance binder to 50 .00 1105. Document preparation to. - 1106. Notary fees to 1107. Attorney's fees to Holland & Knight LLP , (includes above items Numbers: ) 4,500.00 1108. Title insurance to Astro Title Services Inc , . (includes above items Numbers: Owners RP $9075.00 ) 25.00 7,400.00 1109. Lender's coverage $ 1,957,500.00 1110. Owner's coverage $ 2,600,000.00 1111. Electronic Servicing Fee to Astro Title Services, Inc. 125.00 1112. FL Fro 9 Endorsement to Astro Title Services Inc , . 1 113. Alta 8.1 6 Surve & Contiguity to Astro Title Svc. $25.00 each ' 910.00 100.00 7 00 GfiY.ERNMEN..T- tdOR'1]{tJG..ANQTRAN5 1201. Recording Tees: Dee&$ 18.50 Mortgage $' 180.00 Releases$ 198.50 1202. City/county tax/stamps: Deed $ ; Mortgage $ 1203. State tax/stamps: Deed $ 18,200.00 ; Mortgage $ 6,851.25 6,851.25 18, 200.00 1204. INTANGIBLE TAX to Clerk of the Circuit Court 3 915.00 1205. RPr„M >\n,.r,,,,..,.,A;;.,, ni ('.............. A.:._.. -:- °------- '-- , IYyes. u - 1301. Survey to 1302. Pest inspection to 1303. Record Collateral Assignmet to. Clerk of the Circuit Court 69.50 1304. Record Collateral Assignment to Clerk of the Circuit Court 1305. Record UCC-I to Clerk of The Circuit Court 61.00 44.00 1306. Filing Fee UCC-1 to Transaction Registry 34.00 1307. Lenders Attorney Costs to Holland & Knight 375.00 1400. TOTAL SETTLEMENT CHARGES (Enter on line 103, SectionJ - and - line 502, Section K) 127, 195.25 26,025.00 arelully reviewed the HUD-1 a --I lelement end to Iha best 1 my knowledge and belief. It la a true and accurate statement of ell receipts and dlebursemeno made on my account or me In this Irartsacllon. 1 further Ily Ihel t S have received a copy of UD-1 Settlement Statement. ( )rrowers Triangle S. . nd, LLC Sellers The Salvation Army Registration no. L05000077223 e HUD-t Settlement Statement which I have prepared Is a true and accurate account of this transaction. 1 have caused or will cause the funds to be disbursed In accordance with this statement. tttlement Agent Date August 31, 200531, 2005 Kathleen S. Pezone File No. o 7681-PI-04 ARNING: it is a crime to knowingly make lelse ement, to the United States on this or any other similar form. Penalties upon conviction can e 18 U.S. Code section 1001 and section 1010. include a line or Imprisonment. For details sae: Form No.: PTS-HUD2 • • ORIGINAL WHITE PAPER October 1004, updated April 2005 and September and November 2005 On New Automated Parking Garages Harrison Village and Island View Clearwater, Florida By Robotic ParkingTM Systems For Triangle Development, LLC Section A Robotic Parking System Synopsis Section B Summary of Robotic Parking Benefits RECEIVED Section C NOV 0 8 2005 Frequently Asked Questions PLANNING DEPARTMENT Section D C11Y OF CLEARWATER The Hoboken, N7 Robotic Garage Robotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 1 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Section A Robotic Parking System Synopsis • ORIGINAL Reliability As is true for anything man made in this universe, it is prone to fail. The only answer known to date to successfully overcome this is to apply the philosophy of the "one out of two failure". It doesn't mean just simply installing two motors on any single machine; it means the provision of two identical machines, which can take over from one another and accomplish the same task at any time for any location. Robotic Parking Technology has proven to be extremely reliable in the operation of its Hoboken facility with over 130,000 parking transactions to date: the average retrieval time over these 130,000 transactions was 149 seconds, which also counts for instances when as many as ten patrons arrived simultaneously to retrieve their vehicles. On the storage side, this particular configuration is capable of receiving the next vehicle at the same Entry/Exit Station (EES) within 50 seconds after the previous patron has initiated the storage process. These numbers speak reliability and efficiency. After over two years of successful operation the questions of "does it work?" or "what happens if something breaks?" have been answered to the complete satisfaction of the patrons. AND: in these over 700 days of this 24/7 operation, there was not one single hour where no cars were stored or retrieved! A main criterion for reliability is detection and prevention; these are the diagnostics and the maintenance of the system. With a proper maintenance contract in place and a hot line with 24/7 coverage and a short response time, this technology is as reliable as it can be made. The system interface provides automatic reports about runtimes, necessary maintenance checks and many more features to keep the system reliability up. A note: During the New York City black out in August of 2003, the Robotic Parking Facility was the only operating garage in the city - the emergency generator provided the only lights and operation on the block. The garage operated at full capacity without interruption. The robotic parking garages proposed for Harrison Village and Island View combine standard mechanical technology with advanced automation technology, exactly as used in large automobile assembly lines like GM, Ford, and Mercedes. The uniqueness of the system lies in the modularity and flexibility of the system components, and in the seamless integration with the latest software platforms. • A Brief History Initially the mechanical garage concept did not catch on in the US. primarily because there was plenty of land and parking space. In Europe, Asia and Japan however, where land is scarce, hundreds of mechanical garages were built from the mid- 50's. Almost all are still in operation. The largest of these garages, accommodating 849 cars, is an underground garage built by the former Krupp Manufacturing Company. • • The first automated garage was built by Krupp in 1958 in the Deutsche Bank in Munich. This system is still serving the patrons to date with its original installed parts. After over 45 years of continued operation. • Another Krupp example is the underground garage at the Hotel Lotte in Seoul. This garage was built in 1984 by Krupp and has been operating since with over 1,200,000 parking operations per year, which translates to over 3,000 • transactions per day. • The garage proposed for this development is an advancement of the technology applied by Krupp in Germany. The • Hoboken Garage is a stellar example of this. • The first mechanical garage in the USA, built in Cincinnati in 1932, accommodated nearly 400 cars and used a converted • elevator system to hoist individual vehicles from a central receiving area to one of its 24 floors. Once at the appropriate floor, dollies and/or a live attendant pushed the vehicle into its parking space. This garage operated every day until it closed in • 1979. Most of these early garages were demolished to make room for new buildings; two "classics" remain in service in New • York City. Prime Advantages of the Robotic Parking Systems Design This patented design separates all three movements (in and out, up and down, back and forth down the aisles)and has them • handled by individual intelligent components with true redundancy. No single failure will ever result in the ara a becttollmin • inoperable. SV E® • NOV 0 S MRS • Robotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAYER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ORIGINAL This technology allows for two to three times the amount of cars to be parked in the same space/volume of a conventional garage. Numerous secondary advantages such as enhanced safety, security and environmental benefits are outlined below. Parking Procedure The following steps happen when you park a car. • You drive your vehicle into an arrival station and park it; • After swiping a credit card, or using an EZ Pass, a central computer system directs a moveable carrier (pallet) to the arrival station; • The pallet and the vehicle are moved from the arrival station to a lift; • When the lift reaches the properly designated parking level, the pallet and the vehicle are transferred to the parking slot designated by the computer. Retrieval of the pallet and the vehicle is accomplished by simply reversing the procedure. At no time during the process does the vehicle leave the pallet to which it was initially assigned. Section B Summary of Robotic Parking Benefits Less Waiting Time The system is designed to make multiple storage and retrieval activities at the same time. Typical dwell times (between each parking cycle) are between 20 and 40 seconds. This results in a throughput capability of a maximum of 180 to 240 vehicles per hour for all seven Entry/Exit Stations (EES's). The garage will be accessed off Osceola Avenue. No Hacking Out This is a better service than conventional valet service due to the fact that no one ever drives or even touches the car from the time the driver leaves it until it is returned. While inside the facility all cars are turned 180 degrees so the patrons never have to back their cars out. No Stacking Back into the Street The design for the Harrison Village location especially takes into consideration the sensitivity to direct access onto the street. Four Entry/Exit Stations are provided into the garage at this location. Traffic Analysis reveals that these will be able to handle the heaviest traffic flow without causing any backup. In the extremely unlikely event of system failure or delay the traffic will be able to bypass the garage entry entirely and smoothly rejoin the traffic flow. Reduced Traffic Congestion As an interesting note, the garage offers exactly what Department of Transportation (DOT) research has found, that over 50% of the traffic in a typical downtown is simply on the road circling the block and searching for a parking space. As the garage will be built in a downtown location where a conventional garage could not fit, this will drastically reduce traffic in downtown, resulting in less congestion, noise and nuisance, and also reducing the waste of precious space. • Reduction of Emissions No cars running, no emissions. A car driving up a ramp in a conventional garage in search of a parking place has about the • same amount of toxic emissions as a car driving on the highway at 70 - 80 mph. Based on EPA data, it was found a 500 car garage of this type saves over 6,000 gallons of gasoline and eliminates toxic emissions of 1,000 pounds of hydrocarbons, • 3.5 tons of carbon monoxide, 500 pounds of nitrogen oxides and over 60 tons of carbon dioxide on a yearly basis. • Environmentally Clean • Reduces noise and air pollution; self-cleaning; separates oil and water for environmentally sensitive disposal. • Oil drips • Pallets are the metal trays you drive onto when you park your car. They catch any oil, acid or salt water drips from cars. As the car is transported around the garage on its pallet and never leaves it until you drive it out again, this guarantees that no • machinery ever touches any vehicle. And drips from cars or machinery or cars above it can never touch your car. Cars j}[? • Traffic Flow Benefit • Cars enter and and exit from the main street into the facility and exit the same way. "t? [?LLL"'???ll 1;1 I?LJ • Nov 0 8 2005 • Robotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - Apri ENT • CITY OF CLEARWATER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 ORIGINAL System Access The system offers several possibilities: Monthly users may find an "EZ pass" (or "SunPass') is most efficient, while visitors may simply swipe a credit card. The system can also retrieve owners' cars from the facility by remotely dialing into the system computer via a phone line. System Hotline Robotic Parking Systems installs a hotline at its headquarters and GE for remote 24 hours/7 days access with a swift response time. Training Robotic Parking Systems provides on-site training for owner's personnel. System Maintenance Robotic Parking Systems performs diagnostics and maintenance with trained personnel on site. The operation functions on a 24/7 basis. System Redundancy The Robotic Parking System is triple redundant: 1. Every machine has redundant components inherent in it. In addition, there are at least two machines of each kind installed, and either can perform the same task. 2. The computer system is totally redundant itself. If one server fails, the second automatically takes over and as it has the same storage configuration data, no difference will be noticed. 3. An emergency power generator takes care of power outages. System Monitoring The Robotic Parking system can also monitor, watch or operate the system remotely from any location. CIMPLICITy software allows for the creation of reports, at any given time. The extensive diagnostic capability also makes it possible to troubleshoot locally or remotely, and enables the performance of preventive diagnostics - all in real time. Service Warranty A system warranty, maintenance contract and a hotline are in place to ensure continued operation of the system in any eventuality. Trained technicians are available to operate the system and provide other auxiliary services as needed or wanted. A Manned System According to National and International Standards, a public automated parking facility needs to be manned by a manufacturer-trained operator during opening hours. This service is performed by Robotic Parking Systems. This application can also utilize a valet service, where a valet will do the actual parking for the client. Integrated Car Wash If desired, Robotic Parking Systems can easily integrate an automated brushless carwash into the system. Storage Use Parking spaces not used for parking can be used as convenient storage spaces. For the amount of storage needed, pallets can be converted into containers (7x19'x7? and placed in the same parking slots as for cars. The loading and unloading of the containers is performed adjacent the terminal area, but in a location that will not disturb vehicular traffic. Security • To ensure no accidental or malicious access into the parking facility, we install heart beat detectors in the EES area. • Technology is also available to check the cars for explosives and narcotics before entering the facility. Cost effectiveness. Lower maintenance and operating costs due to minimal lighting, ventilation, personnel and insurance requirements. • Highest possible level of security for individuals. Majority of activity is within a contained area at ground level at the front • of the garage. Greatly reduced chance of muggings or assaults; The Robotic Parking System can be viewed as the safest parking facility there is. With explosive and narcotic detection as well as heart beat detection components installed, this facility is second to none in the world - which is the reason why highest security projects are considering using Robotic Parking • Systems. RECEYED 9tlft5 Nriv (118 • Robotic ParkingTM Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAT'ER • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 ORIGINAL Better space utilization. Twice as many cars can be parked in the same space, or the same amount of cars can be parked in half the space as a conventional or surface parking, still leaving enough space for additional development on the site; changes the dynamics of land use. Conventional I Robotic Parking Technology I [Frame8] 200'x 300' = 800 cars 200'x 100' = 724 cars 300' x 100' = 822 cars Much less than half the space used for nearly the same number of Lower liability insurance. Fewer claims. No one enters the garage thus eliminating damage or theft of cars as well as personal injury. Better care and safety of the vehicles. No one enters the garage, no dents, scratches, vandalism or theft, thus eliminating costs incurred in having to repair damaged vehicles. • Problems associatedwith regular parking garages and Robotic Parking solutions Risk of Accident and injury while drining to parking Ground Floor access only, which is safe and well lit • Damage and dents No people inside the garage means 100% secure parking • Theft and vandalism, weather related damage. Fully enclosed structure, with cars totally safe. Driving safety There are no tiresome and dangerous curving ramps to drive. • Access to garage via EZ pass • Simple, easy to use method of access; same as used at toll roads. Offered in addition to regular credit card access, or cash • payment. • Impact on Traffic & Congestion: w • According to Don H. Pickrell, Chief Economist at DOT , Volpe Institute, Cambridge, MIT (issued in the Spring edition of ULI's Smart Growth program, 1999): ".....recent research shows that over 50% of the traffic in • typical downtowns is simply on the road, cruising around the block searching for vacant convenient parking • spaces " • Structural Design Parameters The basic layout of the system design requires a typical slab/mat foundation supporting a steel structure and the machines riding in it. The steel structure presents a kind of erector set with the needed amount of levels. No floors, no ceilings - it is an open rack structure. The bracing and columns are very effective for heavy wind loads as well. • In case of this mixed use development, the structures for the building and the parking facility will be separated in order to avoid any sound or vibration influences into the surrounding building. • Other than that, no special provisions need to be met for permitting purposes since the building is treated like a conventional • storage building. No requirement for turning radii, slope for ramps and width of drive aisles as there are none. • Life Safety Issues • A fire sprinkler system is provided inside the enclosed garage. Lighting is for maintenance purposes only and mechanical ventilation is not necessary since engines do not run inside the facility. Natural ventilation is provided by the installation of • louvers in the roof. Maintenance Protocol Robotic Parking Systems but it utilizes sophisticated diagnostic tools to help maintain a high level of uptime. The system • records every rotation of any wheel, bearing, gearbox and motor. Any needed maintenance is reported immediately to the • online service department immediately. RECEYED • NOV o 8 2005 • Robotic Parking"' Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 5 PLANNING CITY 0CEARWATER • ORIGINAL • • • Section C Frequently Asked Questions • QUESTION Does the Automated Parking System provide true reliability? • ANSWER As evidenced with the installation in Hoboken there was zero downtime in the operation over the last more • than two years. True redundancy of the entire system ensures uptime of the operation any time: redundant machinery, redundant electronics including servers and generator in place. • The System to be installed in the project is the same as installed and operating in Hoboken. As these projects are located in • Clearwater, the headquarters of Robotic Parking Systems, a natural special attention is ensured by the company. • Further, with the operators on site on a 24/7 basis as well as the on-line diagnostic system in place, the observation of the system is guaranteed to the degree that any early warning signals will be taken care of immediately; so it can be stated that • the parking facility will be operational at all times. Please compare as well the article in the September 2004 issue of the National Parking Association. • QUESTION How is peak traffic handled? ANSWER The traffic study results in a peak traffic of 58 cars in and 56 cars out for the peak hour for the garage. The • system configuration as designed for the project has a capacity of 120 vehicles in a ONE directional flow. As the traffic study shows, the peak traffic is equally distributed for in and out traffic; therefore the capacity of the system for a bidirectional flow is much higher than required. Real examples of the garage in Hoboken shows a peak traffic handling of 15 cars in a one directional traffic in 7 minutes. QUESTION How are traffic patterns affected? • ANSWER In/Out traffic from Osceola Avenue is guided by a 'right in' and a 'right out' only pattern. No cross traffic can occur, therefore ensuring a smooth traffic flow in and out of Osceola Avenue. In any unlikely case of traffic overflow the traffic will be redirected seamlessly back to Osceola Ave. • Consideration for pedestrians is not different than in any other garage entrance and exit lanes. Signage is extensive and can • be made interactive. Overall traffic guidance is directed by traffic lights at strategic points of entry. Separate spaces for loading and unloading of vehicles are created outside as well as inside the actual parking facility. These will not influence the traffic flow in and out of the garage. • QUESTION How is the system used? • ANSWER A user's manual will be freely available showing how the patrons in Hoboken became used to the • automated parking facility. Please also compare the NPA article (attached) as to the patron dwell times. • • • R&ECENED • • NOV 0 8 2005 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OFC EARWiA[ER • • • • Robotic Parking""' Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 6 • N • • • • • • • • • • • • • N • N • • • N N • • • • • • • • • • ORIGINAL Section D The Hoboken, N] Robotic Garage The following is an article from The New York Times, about the first US. automated parking facility built three years ago in Hoboken, NJ. Space Age Garages That Save Space By ANTOINETTE MARTIN The New York Times The Hoboken municipal parking garage that opened its robotically controlled doors last year displays a stunning agility. It lifts and carries cars about on computer- controlled steel pallets as if they were delicate ballerinas, moving r with precision and speed inside a structure that is remarkably compact. While performance tests are still going on, the garage /s limited to operating at two- thirds of its full capacity. M? When all systems are going, however, it will park 324 cars on just a 100-by- 100-foot lot. The seven-level garage is 56 feet high, not much higher than the four-story row houses that are its neighbors 'This is amazingly proficient use of space, " commented Darius 56116hub, a New Jersey Institute of Technology professor who studies parking and urban land use. "It may provide one of the solutions to the most important conflict in urban design: where do you put all the cars in environments where car volume is high and space is at a premium': 'An automated garage typically takes only about half as much precious real estate as a conventional ramped garage to handle the same number of cars, or even more. That is why in European and Asian cities, the automatic garage was long ago anointed as the best solution. Mr. Sol%hub said. The Hoboken structure, designed by Gerhard Haag, an engineer and architect born in Germany, where ramped garages are rare and automatic garages common, is a first-of-its-kind in the United States The Hoboken garage belongs to a new generation of fully automated garages that parking industry specialists say is generating new interest. There are 67 American cities, including Manhattan, where his company is currently discussing proposals Hoboken 's Garden Street Garage /s completely computerized, with two identical elevator systems that are able to move simultaneously in both vertical and horizontal directions and communicate with each other by wireless transmitters The garage's computer figures out which of the hundreds of spaces in the building a vehicle should occupy, and then delivers it there untouched by human hands E'-r " A monthly parker pulls into one of four driveways at the redbrick building on Garden Street, which on the outside looks pretty much =- -= like a group of Hoboken row houses The driver powers the car forward a few yards onto a steel pallet, maneuvering the wheels between guardrails as instructions appear on an LED, signboard about correct alignment, then turns off the engine and gets out. After locking the car, the Parker swipes a card /n front of a magnetic reader, and while the sign on the wall is flashing a reminder to step back, automatic elevator doors close around the car and it /s whisked to a computer-assigned slot. r FU) 'ECEVED NOV 0 8 2005 Robotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View "NGINPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • ORIGINAL The computer factors In the vehicle 's size when making an assignment, putting larger SUV's on lower levels It also takes into account the driver's schedule on previous visits, putting vehicles whose owners enter and exit frequently in the slots that the system can most easily access. ll 31oritpns amur momo me Pty J When the owner returns for the car and swipes the card again, the process begins /n reverse. Within seconds, another electronic sign announces at which bay the car will appear, still on the pallet where the Parker placed it. In its first year of operation, according to the computer records, the average wait to retrieve a car was 2.5 minutes Press To view video clips, including a news report from CNN, please visit www.roboticparking.com. While the system was operating fully automated as early as May of 2002, the first patron drove his car into the garage in October 2002. As best summed up by the city official involved in this project from the beginning: "We're pleased to say we have very happy patrons at the automated parking facility" -JoAnn Serrano, Executive Director of Hoboken Parking Utility 'The positive impact on the community has been significant. The customers have experienced great relief from the anxiety of having to find a parking spot. They enjoy the tremendous convenience of a parking facility nearby with all ground level access Additionally, they love the security aspect. They never have to worry about their car being stolen or vandalized. The neighbors /n the immediate area have been very pleased with the quietness of the system and the greatly reduced double parking on the street!" -Michael Cricco, Councilman And others... "...the Hoboken garage displays a stunning agility - it lifts and carries cars about on computer-controlled steel pallets as if they were delicate ballerinas, moving with precision and speed inside a structure that is remarkably compact. " New York Times "....it's amazing, a thing of the future. " Ann Serrano, Exec. Dir. Hoboken Parking Authority ".. When you return... no guesswork about where you parked It, no strange nicks, dents or scratches.. and no parking attendant to tip. ABC World News Tonight "...For drivers leaving or retrieving their cars at a parking garage, it's a dream, no exhaust fumes, no strange nicks or scratches appearing... " Wall Street Journal "...I want to express our extreme pleasure and thanks:.. we were thoroughly impressed and satisfied that it was one of the few things we've seen that shows off the 20th Century technology. " Art Schwotzer - Chairman Crossgates Development "...one VED ECE NOV 0 8 2005 of the most intelligent inventions of the 20th century" AAA World Magazine Robotic ParkingT"' Systems -Triangle Development -Harrison Village & Island View ?WW e? c?ATER ORIGINAL FLD2005-09098 400 JONES ST Date Received: 09/30/2005 HARRISON VILLAGE RETAIL II ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: CBD ATLAS PAGE: 277B 2OZ !' t QTY QFj} -?. PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet A 0 v o;Clearwater Planning Department CASEM F_ ?w .? v 100 South Myrtle Avenue DATE RECEIVED: Clearwater, Florida 33756 RECEIVED BY (staff initials): Telephone: 727-562-4567 ATLAS PAGE #: Fax: 727-562-4865 ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including NORTH: 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SOUTH: WEST: ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) IVN191?0 FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04-05-0 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 420 1-12j,jN C71 IDt?J?OtP?E GOwn P/'1'N`l? l/1? L PLAtdl?iiPdG & DEb`:. t APPLICANT NAME: ? INr, nr n. ..:., ?;AJILR 7SS MAILING ADDRESS: L ',2 10 > PHONE NUMBER: to 00 ZO FAX NUMBER: y'if e 0002 OBSOLW PROPERTY OWNER(S): 94A N &L•E O%-o 113ANt< ft L- D INCAS LL. C et (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on age 6) AGENT NAME: S `'oa;reS MAILING ADDRESS: 3057N. f'0F},2-r2.l5ON ? GC'rr?wA'1tE?1' ?31ss PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: u'4 6 002 d 5'04 13 I I FAX NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 9?', s ?09 . L7. 301 N, 65CUDLA 1 +00 1 If 10,1 "NES -? If 100-OX _? ?-I Pin ?gR?e tSofJ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: see ?? ? L? 4 (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: -see 7 2. &eM44 PARCEL SIZE: 'S• O( /AC'r{'S 2 2(5 , 2 (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT .'$24 1 dwel l jt^cl tIvti 21 169 yv-W I t al (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of non sidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): 1,014 - r7 J'?'h?i?1 T? I aA WIMQ?? Attach sheets and be specific when identifyin the request (include all requested code deviation e.g. reduction in required number of parkin spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infiil Redevelopment Application 2005- City CWO LETS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • OR161NAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable di C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA -Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. i proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly air the value thereof. 3. Th( USE proposed development will not adversely affect the heatth or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed . M ni l 4. Th ,Fp !310 005 t _J proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. O 6 KING&DEV11;A "S!C PILAI 4 %, 01 w. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. on design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, djacent properties. ? Pr+de complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain ho each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. T development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and d looment standards. Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ? *ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The s or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suita avail-, le sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mbc of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise ble in the City of Clearwater. 6. The parce velopment of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the proposed for development. 7. The imme ign of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function th . e ?hpng4 Wra er oFl iate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. PIA N DEVELC??` SVCS. 8. Flerd ifity in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the ben to community character and the immediate vicin' of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Ad uate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. Th design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use sep rate sheets as necessary. Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater . • • nRfGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Crite Manual and 4-202.A.21) 5ec _ t},otAt4 (c" A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH A APPLICATIONS. All applications that inv addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stomhwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to requirement If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stomrwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stommrater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stonnwater plan as noted above is included Stonnwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) 5 ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 361: _ All dimensions; ??- North arrow, Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specin trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development SEP s 0 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOP,-0i N-r CATYiF CLEA ' SAT A Of • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • ORIGINAL Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)oi and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and oNsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtentlabular form; Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio and Floor area ratio F.A.R. for all all nonresidential uses. ' J u U ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %2 X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations ff required to evaluate the proposed stomrwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborisf, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, ra H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: Ate] All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or IabeQ indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Cade requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) G% ?e Sf?101/1 ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) !1-5i e alw)Aejol(. V6 45- ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-5624750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration SEA' S 0 L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersi acl i application re Uuic authorize repe des ed f t ' p a edge that all representations made in this wl accurate to the best of my knowledge and itives to visit and photograph the property STATE OF FLORIDA, COUN1 Swom to and subscribed Signature of proli" a A -r%JoNlo}S C0A pc-s public, My '4 SVCSI before me this 4-1 day of 20f? nd/or by onally known s produced who s &entification. C4mmMm#oD*i"x Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 ORIGINAL. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: '1'121F}N CSC . or-,D wrw +ioC ICI NCV-s 2?' tyr (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): t 10 4 `t° "3 0 2 q N• cg Ut q00 10 N, foor - 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) jftkle5i K110a?btiI oval sF fDf ? a%II? CC) Vt4VAe4l?,-jG, l / L(JdS COa4le5 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and co rect. r Property Owner ?-C'O F&L.LAC4:- Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, ty COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before rrje the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the p of the Stat f Flo personally appeared # of who having bean fir t-du ora t Dep es and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she ned. tc J M i i E i C / Nota Public ` • • • •' ? ?+°y y omm on xp res: ss z-0 r ,.•?Pa? „? ,,, PAMELA JEP; : ??rtea?0 MN4?+R N77 My Commission Expires Jul 24, 2009 DNS P: Commission I DD 454139 Bonded By National Notary Assn. SAPlanning DepartmeriMpplication FormsWevelopment reviewlfiexible development comprehensive infill redevelopment applic?tibn 2005.doc `i PLAN IN V F?i1drS1?CS Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater T r i g e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION • COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT • • NEW COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDO DEVELOPMENT • AT 302, 304, 308, 312, 314, 400, 404 AND 303, 309 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE; 400, 410 ]ONES STREET AND 410 N. FORT HARRISON, DOWNTOWN "' V EAARWATER? ?g • For Submission to the DRC (30th September 2005) • D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 3-913. A) SFP 3 200 Summary PIANNINr I • ? 8 DEVELOPP,? t,IT SVC, This submittal makes slight amendments to a submittal (FLD2005-04034) that was apprbved°try?til°+ • 2005. In the interest of simplicity, these changes are detailed in the next few pages. The bulk of the rest of this • Narrative replicates closely the original approved Proposal for reference purposes. The only changes that have been made to this portion are not substantive and reflect only minor updates to include the changes referred to above. • • There are essentially three changes. • First, in accordance with City intentions to create more retail presence on Fort Harrison, more retail space was created on the ground floor at Harrison Village by moving the seven residential units that were there into the Island View • component. This created an entire ground floor of retail and commercial space. • Second, as was discussed when the project was approved during at the CDB meeting on 19 July 2005, additional • parking has been added. While the previous allocation of parking was approved, it was felt that more parking could only help the viability of the retail component. The parking count has been increased from 503 to 633, an increase of • 130 places. • Third, it became apparent that a small portion (4,900 sf, or 0.11 acre) of land sticking out on the southern side of the • site was superfluous to our necessities and vital to the viability of a neighbor's proposed project on our southern boundary. This piece of land had housed the Island View trash compactors and generators. It is felt that it was far • better for the street frontage to have a live building there instead of trash compactors, however nicely they may have • been housed. In the interest of creating a better overall environment, this small portion has been sold to the neighbor. The solid waste handling area has have since been redesigned and located within into the base structure of • the Island View towers. • As a consequence of these relatively minor changes the approval of the CDB is again required, as the overall site area has changed, and although the total number of units remains the same, the effect of this and the additional retail • on the FAR has necessitated increasing the request from the Density Pool. Naturally, additional contributions • back to the City in the form of streetscape, public art, and increased parking have been made. • Density Pool • (Public Incentives Amenities Pool) • Application is being made for an increase in unit density due to the provision of a significant retail and commercial • component along Fort Harrison. This has incurred a significant hardship for the developer in which necessitates an increased number of residential units needed in order to make the project viable. • Application is being made to draw units, and square footage for the commercial component, from the Clearwater • Downtown Density Pool. • The lots, which are contiguous, total approximately 220,319 sf or 5.06 acres. The allowable density on sites over two acres in this area is 50 units/acre. Portion of the site (8,693 sf, or 0.1995 acres) is TRIANI3LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARR15ON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT COM • • 1 OF 34 r1 64 • Tri gale ORIGINAL • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • designated as an environmental area where only 1 dwelling unit is allowed per acre. The balance available • for development is therefore 220,319 - 8,693 = 211,626 sf, or 4.86 acres. • The total office/retail component is 27,168 sf. The FAR (0.5) for the office/retail component equates to 54,366 sf. Total site (211,626 sf) less 54,366 sf = 157. 290 sf or 3.61 acres. At 50 units/acre this allows • for 181 units. The total number of units planned is 324, or an increase of 143 units. • In the previously approved request, the ratio between requested/allowed units was 324/205, or 37%. • The ratio in this proposal between requested/allowed units is 324/181 or 44%. The reason for the increased request includes the desire to align with City intentions to promote mixed-use development in this area. The City has also mandated and required that commercial and retail components be included on Fort Harrison. While the Applicant is very happy to do this, and feels (as the City does, that this can only serve to enhance the viability of Downtown,) the FAR of 0.5 is too low to encourage mixed-use development and in • fact places a large burden on the developer. An FAR of 0.5 means that for every square foot of • retail/commercial use provided, two square feet have to be set aside from the total site. The previous proposal showed residences on Osceola; these have been moved into the Island View portion of the site, and replaced with commercial/ retail space, covering the entire ground floor of Harrison Village. The provision of this additional retail space, coupled with the burden of the low FAR has • necessitated the Applicant to ask for the additional units from the Density Pool, as well as a dispensation from the City for the extra square footage. • In exchange for this allowance form the Density Pool, the developer proposes extensive provision of • Streetscaping to meet City standards. The total value of the complete Streetscape package for the • previous proposal approached $2 million, and it this latest version has topped $2.6 million. • The Applicant's contribution to the Density Pool as outlined below far exceeds the previously approved contribution, due to the increase in quantity and quality of streetscape provided. More specific data is • included below. It is proposed that th; se units be granted from the Density Pool, with a concomitant increase in height from a limit of 40' to 50' across the Harrison Village site. This height increase was previously approved in the last proposal. • The Island View waterfront condo site tops out at 150'. This height is allowed on the west side of Osceola, and 150' was • previously approved for this development. Additionally, this proposal requests that 8,300 sf be granted from the Downtown Pool for the increased commercial use proposed along in the Harrison Village component. • • Existing conditions • We investigated the Harrison Village and Island View sites before demolition began. Existing on site we found at least 56 separate dwelling units. They were identified by on-site visual inspection, consultation with the property manager and • counting mailboxes. We also noted 7,933 sf office, and 14,120 sf retail space for a total of 22,053sf of retail/commercial space. The office and retail area was calculated from records at the Pinellas Property Appraisers Offices, and a visual inspection of the site. The increased density meets the intent of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. • C CC Parking SEP 3 0 2005 I P .,t N 1 • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC PLANNING -,-- TY&CIF G1. C ELCI , (SVGS CITE.F',Filfltr+?Lt? 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 -F TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOnO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • . 2 OF 34 • • Tri gle ORIGINAL • - DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • The parking within the Robotic Parking garage will be allocated as follows. Total number of spaces available is 633. • Of these, 486 will be allocated to the residents of Island View and Harrison Village. (1.5 per unit). Another 54 will be allocated to the commercial/retail component, at a rate of 2 per 1,000 sf. Given that the Applicant anticipates a • maximum of 12 stores in Harrison Village, a capture rate of 4-plus parking places per store is ample supply for management and workers in the retail/commercial component. • This leaves a balance of 91 spaces. Given the flexibility of the Robotic Parking system, and its ability to learn from usage patterns, the Applicant wishes to reserve the right to use the system to allocate these extra places where they are needed most. Initially, about 30 spaces will be reserved for guests, with the balance (60) given over to casual public parking. Should it happen that more pedestrian usage to the stores occurs than is anticipated, more spaces may be given over to guests or even sold on to residents. By the same token, the Applicant may discover an increased need for public parking for users of the retail stores, in which case these "floating" spaces will be allocated for that use. A system of parking card validation will most probably be used to encourage users of the shops in Harrison Village to park in the garage. The applicant further proposes make to provision for on-street parking along the west side of Fort Harrison between • Jones and Georgia. On-street parking is also proposed on both sides of the newly re-aligned and widened Osceola. Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape • plans. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. • PROPOSAL OF AMENITIES • to be provided in exchange for extra units from Density Pool Contributions to Streetscape These items are noted below for an indication of the quality of the Streetscaping that is envisaged. Please see • Streetscape drawings for further data. Specifications are taken from City of Clearwater Master Streetscape and s Wayfinding Plan, January 27th, 2003. We acknowledge this document is subject to change. • For purposes of clarity, we used the 'Commercial A' and 'B' Streetscaping standards as our baseline. It was felt that the 'Downtown Corridor' grade of streetscaping was inapplicable in that it called for extensive provision of medians, • crosswalks and work in the Right of Way, beyond the curb line. We will be providing extensive streetscaping in the areas • behind the curb line and they will generally provide a level above that of Commercial A and B and equivalent to the Downtown Corridor standards. There will be a transit shelter, newspaper racks, bollards, and signage (indicating that this • site is in the Old Bay neighborhood) and other items called for in the Downtown corridor ar s but not in the Commercial A and B. • The contributions would comprise, generally SF? 3 0 2005 • New road (re-aligned Osceola), resurfacing to Jones and Georgia New curb and curb cuts as needed • Pavers and sidewalk to match Streetscape specification on each street as noted below PLANrg4P4,3 3 0ELLL ;, :=T SVCS? Street lights Quality Hill, Hancock post or equal 6Ty QF (:Lr • Bollards Hancock by Spring City or equal Signage To conform to City of Clearwater Wayfinding plan Benches Scarborough with center arm by Landscape Forms or equal • Trash Cans Scarborough by Landscape Forms or equal Bicycle racks Gramercy by Madrax or as required Newspaper racks (if required) Spencer or equal • Landscape fences on ground level planters Steel Bar by A & T Ironworks or equal • Planting Medjool Palms, Crape Myrtle • The palms on Fort Harrison would be planted not along the right-of-way but instead between the site boundary and the building, as the sidewalk is not very wide on this block and there is more space towards the buildings, which have been expressly set back to accommodate lush landscaping. • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAx: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM s • 3 OF 34 • • Tr i /ga 1 e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Along Fort Harrison • COMMERCIAL A Equivalent Streetscape will match that proposed in City document with regard to all items behind (and including) curb. We will not differentiate between the treatment given to the area between the building and the site boundary and the area from the site boundary to the curb. . Along Jones COMMERCIAL A Equivalent . Same as for Fort Harrison, except tree at greater spacing, say 50', to suit layout of buildings. Palms would be used predominantly on the Fort Harrison end of Jones, changing to predominantly oaks at the Osceola end, to ease the transition into the oaks on Osceola. Pavers, streetlights to suit. Along re-aligned Osceola • COMMERCIAL B Equivalent Palms at corners and trees elsewhere to match existing live oaks. Paving as above but much less of benches, signage etc. Along Georgia S COMMERCIAL B Equivalent Palms would be used predominantly on the Fort Harrison end changing to predominantly oaks at the Osceola end, to ease the transition into the oaks on Osceola. Paving as above but much less of benches, signage etc. If Fort Harrison is • 100%, and Jones 80%, this street is 80% at the retail, 60% at the residential. Previous submittals concerned themselves only with the southern side of Georgia. This application will address the northern side of Georgia below Osceola and especially the treatment of the western end of Georgia and the creation of a "mini-park" whe_re.Geor, is Street meets,. thee waterway. D • Cross Walks Four pedestrian crosswalks across the re-aligned Osceola from Harrison Village to Island Vi: Fp ?05 Medians ? None. , PLAtVr?TG &OFDE?V?Et?'T Parking As noted above, the Applicant wishes to dedicate the balance of 91 spaces where they are needed most. Initially, about 30 spaces will be reserved for guests, with the balance (60) given over to casual public parking. This allocation may vary, depending on need. More spaces may be given over to guests, residents, or public parking for users • of the retail stores, in which case these "floating" spaces will be allocated for that use. The applicant further proposes make to provision for on-street parking along the west side of Fort Harrison between Jones and Georgia. On-street parking is also proposed on both sides of the newly re-aligned and widened Osceola. Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape • plans. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. Clock towers Two individually designed clock towers anchor the north and south corners of the site, on Fort Harrison, are an integral part of the design. The will each have purpose-made clocks on the street faces, and are in fact the signature features of the development. We propose these be counted as part of the streetscape contribution. • Fountains A purpose-made fountain will be located mid-block on Fort Harrison, and another two within the arcades which are • accessible to the public. There will also be a fountain mid-block on the Island View side of Osceola, and one each at the two entrances to the towers. They will all be site-specific, individually tailored to their locations. At present we anticipate using glass sculptures as an integral part of the fountains, purpose -made by a nationally known local glass sculptor. • TMANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCO7TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 4OF34 • • Tr1 g1e NiGiNAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Transit Shelter There is an existing bus stop on Fort Harrison. If it is to be replaced, it will be done to the design shown in the Wayfinding manual. Application will be made to PSTA to move it to the north, onto other property owned by Triangle. Maintenance of items in Right-of Way To be agreed. FDOT Permit • Preliminary meetings have been held with Florida Department of Transportation, and their approval, which is essentially simply for closure of several curb cuts, be required only prior to issuance of Building Permits. We anticipate that the transfer of Alt 19 back to the City will occur during the Harrison Village construction period. Any work done within the . Right of Way on Fort Harrison would be done after it has been transferred back to the City, making FDOT approval superfluous. Additional items supplied concurrent with present Application In addition to the extra parking described above, the Applicant proposes to add additional and upgraded Streetscape to the north side of Georgia between the relocated Osceola and the water (some 340 feet). This would be installed to City specifications on the right-of-way and with the agreement of the neighbors to the north in 500 N Osceola. More intensive landscaping and streetscaping and hardscaping would be performed to the terminal portion of Georgia Street, where it meets the water. This is an area about 60' in length across the end of the Right-of-way . The present condition of this west end of Georgia Street is an unkempt jungle, inaccessible and potentially dangerous. This last portion of the street at present does not exist as a street. The design for this area would include at least two sets of benches, bike racks and possibly a shade structure, along with lush landscaping, winding paths and seating areas. It would obviously be fully accessible to the public and would in fact be a kind of "mini-park" where anyone could enjoy the sunset. Trash cans would also be provided and signs discouraging occupancy by vagrants. Benches and trash cans and any other street furniture would follow the recommendations and specifications included in the Wayfinding requirements. This feature would be built in the public Right of Way, so would be designed, permitted and constructed in very close coordination with the relevant departments at the City, and to the City standards and specifications. ?; l u ?!1?? U&ii Additionally, the landside retention wall on the west of the Island View site will not be terminated at the Georgia Street right-of-way but will rather be continued across the base of Georgia Street to meet the existing seawall at 500 N Osceola, subject to requirements of the City and engineering specifications. This will provide an additional layer of security and safety. The portion of Georgia Street from where it presently ends (see left) to the mini-park mentioned above will be sodded with an appropriate grass, and the subsoil reinforced to allow the passage of emergency vehicles on a surface that is green and attractive, and is not asphalt. Trees growing in the RoW will be removed and replaced with more appropriate foliage at the sides of the road. The view-corridor to the water will be restored. PLANNING & DEVFtOP,,m ?'w SVCS _. QTY OF LER TRIAN13LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC(DTRIANGLEOEVELOPMENT COM 5 OF 34 • • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • • • ;1 • "'T \ 7 4i rWg I e ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Quantities Associated with Streetscape in Approved Proposal Osceola Avenue Item Total ROW. Material Quantity Unit cost cost Pedestrian Light 23 ea. $4,800 $110,400 Bench 4 ea. $1,700 $6,800 Curb & Gutter 6" 1340 If $17 $22,110 Street Paving 21800 sf $5 $109,000 Walk w/Paver Banding 6425 sy $12 $77,100 Crosswalk Paver 80 sy $90 $7,200 Trash Receptacle 2 ea. $950 $1,900 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea. $50,000 $50,000 Demolition 1 ea. $25,000 $25,000 Directional Signage 1 ea. $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions, 0 & P $61,577 $61,577 Architectural/Engineering Fees $28,736 $28,736 Subtotal $175,344 Public/Private ]ones Street ROW. SEP 3 0 2005 Walk W/Paver Banding 2447 sf $12 $29,364 Unit Pavers 6160 sf $12 $73,920 Scored Concrete 2500 sf $12 $30,000 Fountain W/Artwork 5 ea $25,000 $125,000 Live Oak 16 ea $2,600 $41,600 Medjool Palm 11 ea $6,000 $66,000 Planting Areas 9363 sf $5 $46,815 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 0 If $14 $0 Bench 4 ea. $1,700 $6,800 Bike Rack 4 ea $640 $2,560 Trash Receptacle 4 ea $950 $3,800 General Conditions 0. & P. $64,404 $64,404 Architectural/Engineering Fees $30,055 $30,055 Subtotal $523,818 Total $699,162 Pedestrian Light Curb & Gutter 6" Street Paving Walk W/Paver Banding 6sswalk Paver Receptacle around Site Utilities 2 ea $4,800 $9,600 125 If $17 $2,063 1600 sf $5 $8,000 675 sf $12 $8,100 36 sy $90 $3,240 3 ea $1,470 $4,410 1 ea $950 $950 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 1 ea $15,000 $15,000 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 $8,604 $8,604 $4,015 $4,015 Subtotal $69,982 I Di ectional Signage & OEVELC4?r,"Lf1T $V neral Conditions 0. & P. OF "w4a Architectural/Engineering Fees TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT COM 6 OF 34 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • • 0 • • 0 • • • • • • 0 p b?C?Dd? Tri le DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC SE• 4 2005 Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS. Public/Private ' QTY OF CLEA'R.Yit O Walk W/Paver Banding 650 sf $12 $7,800 Live Oak 2 ea $2,600 $5,200 Planter/Landscape 72 sf $30 $2,160 Planting Areas 660 sf $5 $3,300 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 105 If $14 $1,418 Trash Receptacle 3 ea $950 $2,850 General Conditions 0. & P. $3,934 $3,934 Architectural/Engineering Fees $1,836 $1,836 Subtotal $31,998 Total $101,980 Georgia Street ROW. Pedestrian Light 9 ea $4,800 $43,200 Curb & Gutter 6" 735 If $17 $12,128 Walk W/Paver Banding 1300 sf $12 $15,600 Street Paving 11200 sf $5 $56,000 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $25,000 $25,000 Demolition, and Grading 1 ea $25,000 $25,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 Bollards 8 ea $1,470 $11,760 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 Bench 2 ea. $1,700 $3,400 General Conditions 0. & P. $29,248 $29,248 Architectural/Engineering Fees $13,649 $13,649 Subtotal $237,885 Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 1425 sf $12 $17,100 Medjool Palm 2 ea $6,000 $12,000 Live Oak 11 ea $2,600 $28,600 Planter/Landscape 128 sf $30 $3,840 Planting Areas 8740 sf $5 $43,700 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 280 If $135 $37,800 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 General Conditions O. & P. $22,266 $22,266 Architectural/Engineering Fees $10,391 $10,391 Subtotal $181,097 Total $418,982 North Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. Pedestrian Light 12 ea $4,800 $57,600 Bench 5 ea $1,700 $8,500 Curb & Gutter 6" 592 If $17 $9,768 Sidewalk w/ Paver 3462 sf $12 $41,544 Transit Shelter 1 ea $10,000 $10,000 Bollards 18 ea $1,470 $26,460 Fountain W/Artwork 1 ea $50,000 $50,000 TRIAN13LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRI50N AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33 755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFQ (0 TRIANGLEQEVELOPMENT QOM 7 OF 34 ORIGINAL Public/ Private Site Amenities Totals Osceola Avenue ROW. Public/ Private Jones Street ROW. Public/ Private Georgia Street ROW. Public/ Private North Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. Public/ Private Sub-Totals ROW. Public/ Private $175,344 $523,818 $69,982 $31,998 $237,885 $181,097 $319,179 $440,774 $802,390 $1,177,686 Total $1,980,076 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO (O)TRIANl3LEDEVELOPMENT COM Tii gle DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Trash Receptacle 5 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $22,000 $22,000 Demolition 1 ea $30,000 $30,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions 0. & P. $39,243 $39,243 Architectural/Engineering Fees $18,314 $18,314 Subtotal $319,179 Scored Concrete 3280 sf $12 $39,360 Fountain W/Artwork 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Medjool Palm 12 ea $6,000 $72,000 Planter/Landscape 248 sf $30 $7,440 Planting Areas 5014 sf $5 $25,070 Irrigation 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Clock 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Fence 420 If $22 $9,240 Bike Rack 2 ea $640 $1,280 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 General Conditions 0. & P. $54,194 $54,194 Architectural/Engineering Fees $25,290 $25,290 Subtotal $440,774 Total $759,953 8 OF 34 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ? ?Tri (?J}1e • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Additional Quantities Associated with Present Proposal The following quantities and estimated costs are associated with the increased scope of work for Site Amenities associated with the present Proposal, and are in addition to those costs associated with the already approved proposal. Additional Streetscaping to Georgia Street ROW Pedestrian Light 5 ea $4,800 $24,000 Bench 4ea $1,700 $6,800 Curb & Gutter 6" 735 If $17 $12,495 Sidewalkw/Paver 250sf $12 $3,000 Shelter 1 ea $10,000 $10,000 Bollards 12 ea $1,470 $17,640 Trash Receptacle 4ea $950 $3,800 Underground Site Utilities O ea $22,000 $0 Clearing and grubbing 1 ea $20,000 $20,000 Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 Scored Concrete 400 sf $12 $4,800 Medjool Palm 2 ea $6,000 $12,000 Landscape 1440 sf $30 $43,200 Planting Areas (N side) 1800 sf $5 $9,000 Irrigation 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Clock 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Retaining wall 60 If $250 $15,000 Bike Rack 2 ea $640 $1,280 General Conditions O. & P. 1 Is $18,583 $18,583 Architectural/Engineering Fees 1 Is $8,672 $8,672 Total $316,270 Jones Street Relocate overhead power lines l is $250,000 $250,000 to underground General Conditions O. & P. 1 Is $37,500 $37,500 Architectural/Engineering Fees 1 Is $17,500 $17,500 Subtotal $305,000 Thus it can be seen that the total cost of the site amenities provided totals over $2,6 million. p nC??r--j i. 2005 ; ILANNING & DEVELO r< ; f i SVCSl -.QTY 4F CI.,EAR IA I + R TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO( TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 9 of 34 9/30/2005 9:09 AM Harrison Village, Island View (Request approved at CDB August 2005) 2005 09 30 sf ac i and IV (less environmental area) 216,543 4.97 Units - HV 46 2 over park Parking Comm IV E 18 2 over ret IV 0 HV 18,893 IV S 116 14 On-street 0 IV N 144 14 Garage 503 216,543 4.97 324 503 18,893 FAR and Residential Mix Calculation Retail/commercial sf FAR Site Area less Ret/Comm @ Units/Ac Allowed Planned Requested Req/All 18,893 sf @ 0.5 = 37,786 sf 216,543 sf 178,757 sf = 4.10 acres 50 205 324 119 Units 37% Parking Requirements Residential Units Commercial O /1,000sf Total Provided Balance 324 @ 1.5 = 486 18,893 sf = 0 486 503 17 Harrison Village, Island View, Retail only on HV, added parking Units ! sf ac HV 39 2 over retail Parking Retail Commercial HV 52,948 1.22 IV E' 18 2 over park 90" 42 ! HV 18,893 IV 158,678 3,64 IV 5 118 80" 295 Extra 8,275 IV N' 149 60" 296 ? • 211,626 4,86 $24 633 27,168 FAR and Residential: Mix Calculation Retail/commercial sf FAR Site Area less Ret/Comm @ Units/Ac Allowed Planned Requested Reci/All 27,168 sf 4 0.5 = 54,336 sf 211,626 sf 157,290 sf = 3,61 acres 50 181 324 143Units 44% 16,515 sf @ 0.5 = 33,030 sf 211,626 sf 178.596 sf = 4,10 acres 50 205 324 119> Units 37% 10,653 balance of sf requested Parking Requirements Sh ! t • '? ' ' ? + :Residential Units Commercial 2 /1,000sf Total Provided Balance . i. 3 . )1d 324 4 1.5 = 486 27,168 sf = 2 54 540 633 13 r a • ® Tri le DEVELOPMENT C • - r __ _?_ _? ORIGINAL • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Original Narrative The rest of this Narrative replicates closely the original approved Proposal for reference purposes. The only changes that have been made to this portion are not substantive and reflect only minor updates to • include the changes referred to above. Site The site for this development is located east and west of North Osceola Avenue, between Jones and Georgia Streets. On the east of Osceola a low-rise, mixed use development is planned. This will be known as Harrison Village. A high-rise • condo consisting of two towers joined by a low-rise component is planned on the west of Osceola. This will be called Island View. The parcels have been assembled into a single development site, for which this Master Plan is proposed. They will be unified in design. The existing substandard Osceola Avenue will be upgraded to meet City requirements, widened to a 50' right-of way • (from 401 and have two awkward bends removed. It will also have parking on both sides and be fully streetscaped. In addition, the Jones street end of the Harrison Village block will have all the unsightly overhead power lines removed • and relocated underground. • The area of the total site is 211,626 sfor 4.86 acres A Unity of Title document is in progress with our Counsel, Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel • & Bums, LLP. Similarly, street vacation and dedication procedures will parallel this application. . Harrison Village The portion to the east of Osceola Avenue is called for the purposes of this submission Harrison Village. The location is on the block bounded by the re-located Osceola Avenue to the west, Jones Street to the south, Fort Harrison Avenue to the east and Georgia Street to the north. This portion of the project consists of a mixed used development with street level retail and commercial components along Fort Harrison, Jones Georgia and the north and south portions . of Osceola, under a sheltering arcade, and extensive streetscaping around the entire block. Additionally, the block is crossed at two places with internal arcades. This site's residential component comprises 39 high-quality condominium units and approximately 27,168 sf of commercial/retail space. The residents will enter the development through one of two arcades that cross the block, or through a centrally located • elevator core. Residents will be able to enjoy a rooftop pool, spa and barbecue area. The Harrison Village site was previously occupied on the west by four two-story dwelling units that were rented out on a weekly and monthly basis. These existing structures on site dated back to 1925 and 1939, were not well maintained, and have since been demolished. The "Salvation Army" site to the east site has eight buildings, two residential and the rest • for social services, offices, and retail associated with the function of the Salvation Army. Their construction dates range from 1924 to 1992 with the bulk being older buildings with build dates around 1940 to 1960. Although the buildings are in fair to good condition, the Salvation Army has since moved to newer and larger facilities elsewhere in Clearwater, and • all the existing buildings on the sites will be demolished for the new development. • Island View The portion of the development to the west of Osceola, and known as Island View, comprises two high-rise condo towers joined by a low-rise component. The North Tower will contain 119 and the South Tower 146 units. The low- rise portion between the two towers contains the automatic parking garage. The automatic parking garage is accessed off Osceola. • • Above the garage are two stories of residences, 20 in number. The total number of units for the whole building is 285. Island View will have a lavish Clubhouse with meeting facilities, exercise room, pool and spa, coffee bar, and ample storage facilities for the residents. The south part of the Island View site had on it four older buildings dating from 1900 to 1955. They were in poor shape, hnvinn rarantiv haan Ilcari fnr chnrt-term rentals- All have since been demolished. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAx: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOO-TRIANGLEDEVELC 10 OF 34 r ?a UP U6L?U U ? SE p 3, 0 2005 PLANNING & OEVELOPMENT- IL SIMS QTY OF CLEA TF? n I Tri g I e CFp Zoos • A n ? DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC V '? `" R Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PLANNING & DEVELOPr?IEh? SVC5. • Triangle Development paid a total of $12,830,000 for the Harrison Village and Island View sites. The taxable valuations for these sites total $3,964,700. The proposed value of the improvements for Harrison Village and Island View • is in the region of $170m. All sites are within the Old Bay character district of Downtown Clearwater. GENERAL APPLICABILITY REQUIREMENTS • 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. This site is unique in its location. Proximity to the water, new Library, the Bluff, Coachman Park and the proposed Marina, as well as being a gateway for northern development from the Downtown core along Osceola Avenue, all make • it highly desirable. • Adjacent properties consist of, to the south, the Osceola Inn, a six-story mid-rise hotel; to the south-west, the SandCastle religious retreat, a newer seven story building; to the west and south, Belvedere Apartments, an older (1950's) seven-story mid-rise condo block; to the north-west, a high rise condo (500 N Osceola); to the North, low-rise • residential and commercial including an automobile repair facility; and to the east, mixed use low-rise retail and commercial. The scale of adjacent buildings varies greatly. Single family, one-story homes exist alongside mid-rise condos. Generally speaking, the single-family residential structures are all older and most are in need of repair. As regards adjacent buildings, there are none to the east and the west as these sides front entirely on Fort Harrison and Old Clearwater Bay. A parking lot and two seven-story towers occupy the block to the south, and to the north there are a condo tower, single story commercial and garage buildings, and two story residences. The larger buildings are newer or recently refurbished (SandCastle, Osceola Inn). The height of the proposed new buildings at Harrison Village is 50', with stepbacks at 30' and with extensive variation in footprint and elevation. This scale thus forms an appropriate link between the higher structures to the south and the lower building stock prevalent to the north and east The Island View building aligns with existing high-rises on the Waterway. No new low-rise single-family residential development has occurred in this area for about forty years. The last condo development (500 N Osceola, a high-rise) was built in 1975 and only recently has a five story condo has been completed at 700 N Osceola. The bulk of the existing buildings around the site varies from one to seven stories, and from a tower (Osceola Inn) to more traditional apartment prototypes. Prolific use has been made of setbacks and stepbacks in the proposed development. On the Harrison Village site the units have been stepped back at the second-floor level and have had careful attention paid to the detailing of all facades visually to decrease the bulk of the structures. They have been broken up with roofs, balconies, decks and trellises as well as stepbacks. These are somewhat difficult to read on plan. Attention is drawn to the sections and perspective drawings. On Fort Harrison, the Harrison Village retail buildings have been set back on average 15ft from the site boundary. Within this setback an arcade runs the length of the site, varying in width from 7 to lift. The distance from the boundary to the curb is 7 to 15 ft. This allows for extensive street- and landscaping. Along Georgia the setback from the curb is 16 to 23ft, along Jones 15 to 20ft, and along Osceola the setback runs from 12 to 16ft from the site boundary, and another 5 to 13' to the curb. Again, space allowed for extensive street- and landscaping. The attached streetscape drawings illustrate this better and show the considerable care that has been taken with the private and public interface around the development. Extensive provisions have been made for a gradient from public to semi-public to semi-private to private space. Storefronts along North Fort Harrison will have wide covered TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAx: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(C-TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT COM 1 1 OF 34 ? rl r - Zl [7 r ?, ??Trl gle ? C r?? 0 2005 O 6`? GINAL D EVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ?? • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PNING & walkway in front of them, making it possible to traverse the length of the block under LAN D EVE! OPMENTSVC , crossing the site. These will be a boon in typical tropical Florida weather. Further drawings show how this area relates to the sidewalk and the street. This covered walkway will provide shelter to pedestrians, and shade storefronts against a direct sunlight. The residents will enter the development through one of three entrances on the street. The two Island View towers have also had careful attention paid to detailing so that they do not appear to be • monolithic blocks, extruded up into the sky. They follow very basic rules of design in being differentiated vertically into the three components of a base, a body, and a capital. The base, which will be the parking level, has a different texture and color from the body, where most of the units will be situated. The capital is the topmost (penthouse) level, where decks have been increased and close scrutiny has been paid to the detailing of the parapets and pediments that form the roofline. Again, on Island View, there are significant stepbacks to reduce the mass of the building about the 30' and 50' level on the Osceola face, and about the 100' level on the north, south and west sides. The coverage of the site differs from those surrounding it in that all the surrounding buildings have extensive surface parking for their cars, mostly uncovered. In this development almost all the parking will occur inside the building in the enclosed automatic garage, and thus the actual coverage will be much less than a typical building of this type. • As regards density, the number of dwelling units being proposed is slightly higher than the norm for the area. This aligns with the Vision for the Downtown redevelopment which calls for the development of a variety of residential • projects to attract new residents to Downtown, and which is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. (Quotations in italics) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The character of adjacent properties varies from newer high-rise condos in good shape to single story rooming houses. The immediate vicinity will be materially upgraded by the proposed development. The developers envisage that the proposed development will set the benchmark for future development across the whole area. i 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The residential land use in this development is at an increased density, as called for in the Redevelopment Plan. It will i encourage others in the area to develop residential units to fulfill the vision of the Plan. The value of surrounding land • has increased significantly over just the last few months, directly as a result of the present development. • The developers believe that by redeveloping this parcel in the Downtown area further redevelopment will be encouraged, with a subsequent increase in property value. This will be the first significant residential building built in this area since at least 1960. This can only result in an increase in property value for adjacent land. Most of the smaller residential building stock in the immediate area no longer meets the demanding standards of today's market, while the land on which they are located has increased significantly in value. This will give further incentive for future, similar redevelopment. This is a strong vote of confidence in the potential of the area, and of the positive effects envisaged to come from the proposed development. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the S neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed use is residential and commercial; this use is typical of this neighborhood. In addition, all relevant Codes will be complied with from the inception planning to construction completion. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Fort Harrison, Jones and Georgia Streets are two-way streets. There are no vehicular entrances to the property from these streets. Osceola Avenue is also a two-way street which becomes a one-way street from the intersection with i Jones to the north. It carries light local traffic (as do Georgia and Jones) and is not a major through-road. At present it is TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 445 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOC-TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM i 12 OF 34 • '? GNAL T r g«<l e DEVELOPMENT COMP, • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater substandard in width and difficult or even hazardous to negotiate given its winding character. The Applicant's proposal will eliminate two right-angle bends and widen the Right-of Way to a generous two-way street width. See • attached Traffic Study. • Osceola will be widened to bring it up to standard, and it will be widened and converted to two-way traffic flow. • Harrison Village and Island View residents will enter the automatic parking from Osceola. The automatic parking garage • has seven Entry/Exit Stations (EES's) and about 85ft between street and the closest EES door. This provides ample • stacking space. The system is designed to make multiple storage and retrieval activities at the same time. Typical dwell times (between each parking cycle) are between 20 and 40 seconds. This results in a throughput capability of about • 40 to 50 vehicles per hour at each Entry/Exit Station. • With this configuration vehicle may enter or exit at any station, allowing for the fastest possible throughput. In order to • prevent cars from trying to enter and exit from the same bay at the same time at the Robotic Parking, indicator lights will tell drivers which bays can be used, similar to those at Toll Booths. The entries will also be actively signed so that • vehicles attempting to enter the garage when there is any congestion will be waved off and be able to bypass the entrance entirely. No backing up of traffic. Please see attached White Paper for more data. Pedestrian traffic will • be protected by active signage, and any approaching traffic will be low-speed and will be highly visible, providing a long • reaction distance. • A system of parking card validation will most probably be used to encourage users of the shops in Harrison Village to • park in the garage. • The applicant further proposes make to provision for on-street parking along the west side of Fort Harrison between ]ones and Georgia. On-street parking is also proposed on both sides of the newly re-aligned and widened Osceola. • Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape • plans. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. • 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel • proposed for development. • The community character is residential and commercial, ranging from condos to single-family houses, and single story • retail and commercial uses. This development provides an increased density for residential purposes, and increased retail/commercial components, directly related to the streets. The immediate vicinity will be materially upgraded by the • proposed development. The existing building stock has generally seen better days. The developers envisage that the proposed development will provide the neighborhood with an upmarket structure, entirely within the community • character of the area, and set the benchmark for future development in the entire area. • 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, and olfactory • and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties • Two separate solid waste areas will be enclosed within the two towers, where they will be enclosed, cooled and • ventilated to minimize olfactory and unsightly visual impact. This is in excess of Code requirements. Thus, no adverse visual acoustic or olfactory impacts are envisioned on adjacent properties. The location of the Solid Waste areas has also • been chosen to minimize traffic disruption. • The residential component will adhere to normal residential standards and residential hours of operation will apply. The • retail component will operate under normal business hours. • • SEA' 3 0 2005 • • PLANNING & DEVELQFmj,41 • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAx: 727 446 00132 EMAIL: INFOOTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 13 OF 34 ({;J1 V? r u 0" T`Iwgie DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 1 C!r p , V 20105 • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITE PLANNING& DEVELOPPJiENTSV 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards • This proposed development does not deviate from the use standards, having only residential and commercial • components. Application is being made, however, for an increase in unit density due to the provision of a significant retail and commercial component along Fort Harrison, as well as increase in the allowable square footage for the retail/commercial component. This FAR restrictions of 0.5 have incurred a significant hardship for the developer, which • necessitates an increased number of residential units needed in order to make the project viable. The retail component will be more neighborhood in character, with predominantly pedestrian patrons. The use of Osceola for vehicular access has freed up the entire west side of Fort Harrison for on-street parking, as well as both sides of Osceola, increasing the total of on-street parking directly contiguous to the site. Application is thus being made to draw units from the Clearwater Downtown Density Pool. Application is also made to draw • square footage for the retail/commercial component. See DENSITY POOL above for calculations. Parking • requirements are detailed on the Data Table. Additional comments in PARKING below. The increased density meets the intent of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, as does the increased residential and • retail/commercial component. • A number of alternatives are suggested in exchange for this, chief of which is the provision of streetscaping and public art. See attached documents. • 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties (include the existing value of the site • and the proposed value of the site with the improvements) The value of property depends on highest and best use improvements on the site and the market factors of supply and • demand. The value of abutting properties will not be compromised and will most likely actually be significantly enhanced. A substantial public benefit will be created by the development itself and the creation of the pedestrian promenade along • Fort Harrison and Osceola with significant retail and commercial components. At present the developer is considering uses such as an ice-cream store, a coffee shop, a video and DVD store, a bookstore as well as professional offices for the storefronts along Fort Harrison and Osceola. Lush landscaping will be provided and pedestrian access will be • enhanced. Downtown will gain over 300 new households in an upmarket environment., as well as a new retail and commercial destination for people living in Downtown and elsewhere in Clearwater. Triangle Development paid a total of $12,830,000 for the Harrison Village and Island View sites. According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser the total of the taxable valuations for all the existing sites is $3,964,700.The proposed value • of the improvements for Harrison Village and Island View is in the region of $170m. It should be clear from the above figures at least that not only has land become more valuable in this immediate area but also that considerable money will be invested in the development and a sharp rise can be predicted in the value of • the adjoining lots. This rise has ready occurred. • 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of • Clearwater. • The development is residential and commercial, and strongly encouraged by the City of Clearwater. By creating an • automated parking garage, residents will benefit from faster storage and retrieval of cars, less emissions, less heat build- up in parked cars, protection from the weather, wholly safe access and secure parking. • 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent • land uses • • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCC1-TRIANGLED EVELOPM ENT.COM • • 14 OF 34 • • • • T rg l e op DEVEi LOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater li Adjacent land uses are primarily residential, with commercial components along Fort Harris ff development is compatible with the existing residential components and provides upgraded retail facilities with sheltered access along Fort Harrison, the major commercial thoroughfare, and Osceola. This aligns strongly with the Vision of the Plan, to provide an increased residential base, one of the primary building blocks for a flourishing Downtown. 5 NotApplicable 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As has been indicated above, the surrounding lots are generally either already developed with higher density residential • or are single-family homes waiting to be upgraded. The proposed development will serve as a forerunner for future development in this area and result in a general upgrade not only of the building stock but also of the streetscape and general ambiance of the area. 7 The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that • enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. • The form of the proposed development at Harrison Village is an upmarket condominium village, with a very active street interface along the busiest thoroughfare, Fort Harrison, and carefully detailed smaller scale buildings along the remaining streets. Island View is a typical high-rise form but with special attention paid to stepbacks to produce a "wedding cake" effect, which reduces the visual impact of the mass of the building. Functionally, both buildings are of a standard pattern for high and low-rise condominium buildings. The community character will be enhanced by the design. 8. flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for redevelopment and the City of Clearwater as • a whole. Setbacks No flexibility is requested for lot width or required setbacks. Zero setbacks are permissible in the Downtown area. Compliance is made with the 20 ft sight triangles at the applicable corners and vehicular access points on the site. Parking • On-site parking is supplied in the automated parking in the Island View garage. The majority of the automatic parking bays are handicapped-compatible. • Parking requirements for residential units in this area are 1 to 1.5 per unit. There are 324 units. At 1.5 per unit, 486 are required. Over 630 places will be provided in the garage with a further 40-plus on-street parking places. Please see attached Data Table for more info. Visitors may obviously park on the street, but will more likely make use of the robotic • parking. The person whom they are visiting can arrange for the remote validation of the parking to make it free. • City requirements for the commercial/retail component are 2 to 4 per 1,000 sf. Whilst previous submissions were approved by the CDB with parking only for owners and a limited number of staff for the stores and offices, and zero parking requirement for casual use at the retail component, this application provides 2 parking places per 1,000 sf, and provides a large number of unallocated spaces for guests, and users of the a retail/commercial facilities. The commercial component is in use during the hours that there is least residential occupancy. Given the high density of the development, it is felt that the commercial component will be served by a larger percentage of foot traffic. More people living closer equals less vehicular traffic. The robotic parking facilities can be programmed to allocate • any number of places to residential or commerdal uses. The capabilities and advantages of the automatic parking TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCa-TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 1 5 OF 34 • and commercial ?(}?Y, o5 Til le SEP 010 GINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORI - ____ - -_ -1 - d J' . Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT8 rJTV garage to residents are the subject of a White Paper by the manufacturers, Robotic Parkwhich is inc u e (n • submission. Handicap accessibility to ADA standards is incorporated in the garage. • There are an additional on-street parking places created by the development, on Osceola and Fort Harrison. On- street parking within 1,000 ft of the property totals over 100 spaces, not including the Steinmart/Library lot. • As use of the Density Pool is being requested, the height of the Harrison Village building will allowed to be lifted from the mandated 40' to the 50' limit. At present the design has a roof height of less than 40' so this provision may not be • needed. The Developer would however choose to retain the option of increased height, should it be needed. Above the roof height 30" parapets will be extended (per definition of Height in Section 8-102 of the Clearwater Community Development Code) and the elevator and mechanical equipment rooms may extend the full permitted 16' above the allowed building height. The clocktowers on the comers of ]ones, Georgia and Fort Harrison would take advantage of the definition of mechanical rooms to rise above the rooflines to create architectural embellishments which are functional • and aesthetic landmarks. The Island View property remains at the 150' level. Additional units are being requested from the Density Pool, as well as square footage for retail/commercial component. This conforms to the spirit of increased density, one of the aims of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The developers • have discussed a range of choices for the provision of Public Amenities, so the benefits that accrue to the developers from these units could be reciprocated. Significant contributions to Streetscape on the site were previously approved at CDB, and additional contributions for this proposal are detailed elsewhere. The developer . believes this arrangement should continue to be satisfactory. The developers are very confident some mutually beneficial agreement can easily be reached, where the Downtown urban fabric is materially enhanced, for the advantage of all. Major contributions to Streetscape. Please see the attached document and drawings which detail the contributions to Streetscape. It is anticipated at this stage that the building will have covered arcades partially along the retail/commercial frontage of Fort Harrison and Osceola, and two arcades traversing the block. The sidewalks and benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks and more • around the site will be brought up to the high standards of the Clearwater Streetscape, with lush landscaping. Special attention is paid in this proposal to the creation of a "mini-park " at the bottom of Georgia Street, an addition specific to this (September 2005) proposal. The landscaping proposal provides further details. At the Fort Harrison comers of ]ones and Georgia, attractive working clocktowers will be built to landmark the site along the Fort Harrison corridor, which forms the entrance and gateway to Downtown Clearwater. There will also be well-designed public fountains, located on Fort Harrison and Osceola. These will most likely be individually designed and fabricated in cast glass buy a nationally known local artist, and form the Public Art amenity • portion of the Public Amenities Incentive Pool (Density Pool.) • In addition to the above, and specific to this present request Bicycle Traffic As the Downtown area becomes more pedestrian and bicycle friendly, and given the proximity of the site to the Pinellas Trail (two blocks) and noting the relatively large amount of bicycle traffic, secure bicycle racks (to City standards) will be • provided for residents and shoppers. It is anticipated a large number of people would avail themselves of this facility. The developer has met with Felicia Leonard of the City and briefed her on the project. She was pleased with the overall project, will continue to monitor it and will have comments when more detailed plans are presented. Drop-offs • Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape plans, and in the parking garage entrance off Osceola. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. • 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. Development Standards call for 1 to 1.5 parking places per unit. Retail/commercial requirement is 2 to 4/1,000 sf. This development falls within this range. (See 8 above.) TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@-TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT COM • 1 6 OF 34 • 7 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • W, l e • G T r l g ® RI INAL T COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater la The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District Design Guidelines in Division 5 ofArticle 3. An analysis of the Downtown Redevelopment plan was made and the proposed development was found to align with many specific points, as outlined below, and contradict none. Signage The signage component will be the subject of a separate submittal. Although the tenants are not yet finalized, signage standards more strict than those of the City will be enforced. A full signage package will be submitted for review when more is known of the tenant requirements. Generally speaking, however, signage will be hung in the space under the arches of the arcade, integrated into the overall architectural design, and uniform from shop to shop. Signage for the development will most likely be made outside each entrance lobby, probably on the awning at the door. See the Streetscape drawings. Staging and Phasing Harrison Village and Island View The Island View property has had all of the existing structures demolished. The Harrison Village property has also had some structures demolished, on the portion previously owned by Markopoulos. Demolition of the remainder of the site (the Salvation Army portion) has begun with inspections for hazardous materials already in hand. Construction of the new Osceola Avenue will follow. The developer aims to open Island View and Harrison Village at the same time. As construction for Island View will take 18 months, and Harrison Village only 10 months, construction will start on the Island View property first. The Harrison Village site will be used for staging the building materials associated with the first months of construction on Island View. Then the site will be cleared and construction of Harrison Village commence there. Throughout all this time, the re-aligned Osceola Avenue will be graded and compacted to sub-grade, and will be kept passable for emergency vehicles only and closed to public vehicular traffic. Signage will be installed on the old Osceola "stub" to prevent confusion with the relocation of Osceola. SEP 2005 LU_ QMUS1lATE rB TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFD?TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT COMCOM 17 OF 34 • Tri g1e RTROTR • ORIGINAL-,--.,---- Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater 0 2C35 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN • PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SVCS `?? Vision of Plan • The Vision section of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan calls for (quotations in italia) a vibrant downtown that is mindful of its heritage, noting that the revitalization of Downtown Clearwater is critical to the City's overall • success It calls for the development of an integrated community of retail, residential, office and recreation, especially a variety of residential projects to attract new residents, this being a critical factor in the success of a revitalized Downtown. A quick perusal of the Site Plan of this development will reveal all these elements. It cannot be denied that the increase in upmarket residential units as close as these to the Downtown core signals the . start of a new impetus towards the revitalization of Downtown. The developers are aware of the potential of Downtown, as shown by their confidence in property acquisition and willingness to build on the property they have acquired rather • than leave it undeveloped 'as an investment'. They feel a responsibility towards their City, and a strong desire for it to • grow strong, and grow strong with it. • Further, the vision calls for Osceola and Fort Harrison to be redeveloped as pedestrian-oriented streets The presence and siting of the new building will strengthen this endeavor by responding at street level to create an attractive streetscape. The Plan states that quality urban design is critical to new construction. The developers align strongly with this . statement, and feel that their contribution to the urban fabric is of highest quality. Market related forces make this a necessity. The proposed streetscape, as part of the package proposed, will also enhance the experience and vitality of Downtown. Additionally, the elimination of blighting conditions is critical to the future health of Downtown. Attention is drawn to the • attached photographs of the existing conditions on the site. While performing a necessary function of provision of residential housing, the proposed upgrades will go a long way to increasing not only the tax base of the City but also encourage further economic revitalization. A cursory view of the existing conditions on the site will reveal the necessity • of this development. Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Plan Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living. The proposed development will attract (and already has started to) people not only from Clearwater itself, but also from • as far away as Australia. The proximity of the facilities provided by the SandCastle Religious Retreat will account, it is believed, for a number of residents. The upmarket stores planned will further attract non-residents, who will get to know and use downtown more and more. It will snowball. Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be • consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. This development is consistent with the spirit of the neighborhood, and will follow the directions of the Downtown . Design guidelines. . Objective IE.• A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents • Business will be encouraged to occupy the offices and stores planned along Fort Harrison, Georgia, Jones and Osceola. • Objective IG.• Residential uses in Downtown are encouraged with a variety of densities, housing types and affordability consistent with the character districts • This development provides residential condominiums in a range of sizes (one to four bedrooms) and a range of types (low-rise, high rise, urban street-facing units) and is wholly consistent with this Objective, and the character of this i District. It provides a higher density of housing in an area that needs an increase in population for the good of the City. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT COM • • 1 8 OF 34 • • • • • D PP?FFf DNF { Tri C? _ _gle =DEVELOPMEFF ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ? Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PLANVCS Objective I H.• A variety of incentives shall be available to encourage redevelopment within the Downtown. This development will be one of the first to partake of the "Density Pool". Objective 11 The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. Obviously this Objective has been more than met, with the quantity of housing to be provided. Objective IK.• Downtown shall be a safe environment for both residents and visitors by addressing real and perceived public safety issues By removing low-quality housing, a perceived public safety threat is ameliorated. These properties have had, in the past, a fairly high traffic of public safety officer visits. Movement Goal Objective 2,4: The Downtown street grid should be maintained No change is made to the street grid. Osceola Avenue is relocated, realigned and improved. The pedestrian street grid is improved with the arcades piercing the long Harrison Village block, allowing an easy flow through between Fort Harrison and Osceola. Objective 2H. A variety of parking solutions for motorized and non -motorized vehicles shall be pursued to support redevelopment while maintaining ease of access and parking throughout the Downtown. A very creative solution has been provided her with the groundbreaking use of automated valet, or "robotic" parking, a first in the County if not the State. Bicycles and their ilk have not been forgotten, and provision will be made for their safe and secure storage, with special attention being paid to the ease with which they may be accessed for use. Objective 21 Redevelopment and shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout Downtown. By upgrading the sidewalks, providing streetscaping and building something attractive to walk past, this Objective will be reinforced. See attached documents and drawings for Streetscape data. Amenity Goal Goal 3: Create Downtown as a memorable place to be enjoyed by residents and visitors that capitalizes on ClearwateK; waterfront location, natural resources, built en Or onment and history. Objective 38.• The new main Library will serve as a cultural attraction and an anchor for the northem section of the downtown core. It is no coincidence that this development, which is the first residential project to be started in many years in the northern section of the downtown core, should be proposed so soon after the completion of the new Main Library. This cultural anchor, a visible show of confidence in the area, is one of the main reasons why this site and is regarded as an ideal location for new development. Objective 3D. Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The Harrison Village buildings represent a particular building form, (multi-family, low-rise residential) which respects and enhances Downtown's character and heritage. Historical references are used in a context of modern design, forming a blend that will not look out of place in its surroundings while preserving a very specific design identity of its own. The Island View high rise continues the Mediterranean Revival design theme of the Village. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAx: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC7a TRIANGLEOEVELOPMENT.COM 1 9 OF 34 • "Tr i g 1 eEP 0 2005 . 1+? V L f DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT $1 A vibrant downtown will be promoted by providing an ambient population who will live in and enjoy Downtown and • contribute to the life in Downtown, both economically and culturally. Policies Policy 1: The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and • new construction in Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. • This project strives to be consistent and follow these excellent Guidelines. Policy Z The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process Projects shall • be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. . We believe that this project sets the Gold Standard for the Old Bay district. • Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The pedestrian environment will be enhanced by this new development. As the vision statement of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan calls for Osceola to be regarded as a pedestrian-oriented street, the presence and siting of the new buildings will respond at street level to create an attractive streetscape. Trees and planters will be provided and maintained, and a shelter will be provided against showers and sun along the street facades, and arcades will cross the • long Harrison Village block in two places. The buildings were set back from the street at the request of the City to • incorporate a covered walkway along the face of the retail and commercial component, and include lush landscaping (similar to that on the adjoining block on the south) and provide for extensive streetscaping. This also makes for a more amenable environment for the dwelling units above. • Storefronts will have wide covered walkway in front of them, making it possible to traverse the entire length of the block • under cover. This will provide shelter to pedestrians, and shade storefronts against direct sunlight. This is a boon in typical Florida weather. Further drawings show how this area relates to the sidewalk and the street. • Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for • projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development • potential based on a provision of selected public amenities.. The Public Amenities Incentive Pool is the vehicle through which developers wish to increase the density and height allowances for this site, as referred to earlier. Such increases are allowable in this section of the Old Bay character • district. The provision of selected public amenities has also been referred to earlier, with the provision of streetscape • contributions and public art. Policy 14: The education of Downtown property owners should be emphasized regarding Clearwater building and property maintenance standards Litter control and maintenance of landscaped areas shall be a priority for Downtown. • The City will maintain its properties and public infrastructure as the example for other property owners Litter control and maintenance is vital to the continued positive perception of the development and the maintenance of its actual and perceived value. Careful consideration has been put to the subject of solid waste, in consultation with the • Solid Waste Department. Solid waste is handled within the base of the high-rises, in a cooled, insulated roofed enclosure, with provision for recycling and cardboard disposal. Policy 17 Property owners/developers are encouraged to meet with area neighborhood associations/business groups • prior to submitting a major redevelopment project for City re view. • This is ongoing. Neighbors have been contacted on all sides, and documentation of support for this development will be . forthcoming. So far, the following have been contacted and all have voiced their approval and support. • Church of Scientology. Strong approval. • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAx: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANCoLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 20 OF 34 r1 6.J ?? • T r iW9 l e UP DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC V y V L 2005 Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS, A presentation has been made to the Downtown Development Board for the previo & j M9AQ"4 pp was received. The Belvedere, 300 N Osceola, Board of Directors and interested residents. (Previous incarnation of this project.) The Curt Larson property (500 N Fort Harrison) has been acquired by Triangle Development. Policy 18.• The City shall assist neighborhoods in the formation and development of neighborhood associations that empower residents to improve their neighborhood and strengthen ties between residents and government. This development will form a strong component of the neighborhood association, and has a strong in interest in the • maintenance of very high standards in the area. • Policy 19. Residential development shall provide appropriate on site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project • A significant portion of the site and construction budget has been set aside for such facilities. These include a clubhouse with flexible meeting/party rooms, a music room, a media room, and a large (AAU standard 25 yard) swimming pool, hot • tubs, an exercise facility with change room and showers, fountains, and lavishly landscaped garden. These facilities will be located at the Island View portion of the site. The Harrison Village residents will have a rooftop pool, hot tub and covered outside barbecue area, all on the roof of the building. The Clubhouse at Island View is provided for the exclusive use of the owners at Island View. They will be able to • conduct only private functions there such as parties or small weddings. Facilities provided in the Clubhouse will be limited to a toilet, wet bar, vending machines (directed to traffic from the pool) wash-up facilities (a sink) and a warm-up kitchen. No cooking. No renting out. The developers fully recognize the value of lush landscaping well maintained in setting and keeping value for a property. . The motif of the palms at the Library can be echoed on the site. Elsewhere landscaping is use to break the mass of the building, and accentuate the stepbacks. • Additionally on the penthouse level of the building trellises have been designed, to be overgrown with bougainvillea or the like to provide a softening of the roofline of the building when viewed from street level. Policy 23. The City prefers and shall encourage altemative stormwater management solutions rather than installation of on -site stormwater retention ponds These alternatives may include neighborhood or regional stormwater programs that • make significant improvements to the overall stormwater system and environment. • Our Civil Engineer is familiar with the requirements of the City and we will comply with them. Policy 24; The City shall give priority to sidewalk construction within Downtown that enhances pedestrian linkages and/or • completes a continuous sidewalk system on all streets • Pedestrian linkages across the site will be made by the two cross-arcades. Sidewalk reconstruction is a matter of course in this project as the developer wishes to maximize the aesthetic impact of the project by putting it in the best surroundings possible, while meeting Streetscape standards. Extensive lush landscaping, planters, decorative railings, • new trees and palms are planned. An analogy might be made with providing a beautiful frame for a beautiful picture! • Policy 26. The CRA will consider abatement of impact fees and permit fees as an incentive for redevelopment projects that are consistent with this Plan. The developers would welcome any abatement of fees, as we believe we are endeavoring to align with the stated goals and objectives of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Plan wherever possible., as well as materially improving Osceola, Jones, Georgia and Fort Harrison. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOC-TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 21 OF 34 • • • • • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • W ? T `r l /}?.J?? l e ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC t Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Policy 27 Properties whose uses have resulted in a higher police level of service than typical properties are encouraged to redevelop with uses consistent with the applicable character district; if a higher police level of service continues, the use will be the focus of nuisance abatement strategies and law enforcement. The developers believe that the redevelopment of this area will lead to a dramatically decreased level of police service. Already the level of Police service has decreased with the demolition of the existing buildings. SP S 0 2005 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(a-TRIANGLEDEVELORMENT QOM 22 OF 34 ?, • Tri g1e • ORIGINAL W Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater 0 DOWNTOWN CHARACTER DISTRICT The lot concerned falls within the Downtown District, Old Bay Character area. The Old Bay District is a transitional area between the Downtown Core and the low density residential areas to the north. Old Bay is comprised of a mix of land uses including governmental, residential (including single-family dwellings), commercial, industrial, institutional and recreational. This mix, while giving the District great diversity, also results in incompatible development pattems and uses. The developers believe the development proposed promotes the character of the Old Bay District. The uses are compatible; the site is located alongside lots with height restrictions of 100 and 150', and it forms an easy gradient from • these structures to the finer scale dwellings to the north. • District Vision Uses The Old Bay District is envisioned to be a mixed-use neighborhood supporting the Downtown employment base wtffi • residential, limited neighborhood commercial and office uses A variety of densities and housing styles are encouraged throughout the District, as well as renovations of existing older structures This District provides an opportunity for higher-density residential uses along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue, provided such development is sensitive • to the established low-rise historic character of the District. The eastern frontage of Osceola Avenue may retain its residential use, convert existing buildings to offices, redevelop with residential scale ott'ices or combine these two uses on the same site. The site is located on the east side of Osceola Avenue and adds considerably to the residential use. It provides a mix of • low-rise one, two and three bedroom units in an exciting urban location. A strong retail component comprising a planned ice cream store, coffee shop, DVD and video rental and the like are accessed from a sheltered arcade around and across • the site. The character of the district is respected through the use of an historical (Mediterranean Revival) design theme and the smaller scale nature of the development along Osceola, as well as the retail and commercial arcade along Fort Harrison. This higher-density residential uses occur in Island View along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue, in the two • towers. The eastern side of Osceola Avenue combines residential, retail and commercial facilities on the same site. Function The character of Old Bay should be strengthened through streetscape elements that identify the District as a Downtown • neighborhood. As discussed above, this vision aligns exactly with the vision conceived for the site under question, especially as regards • Streetscape. Development Patterns Greater heights in the higher density residential area west of Osceola Avenue may be considered. The development pattern in the balance of the District is expected to remain urban in character reflecting the low-rise scale (two to three stories) of the existing neighborhood! Renovation/restoration of existing historic homes is strongly encouraged • and new development should provide references to the neighborhoods historic features in their design. Redevelopment should provide opportunities for comfortable pedestrian travel and access to public areas including the Seminole Street Launching Facility and Pinellas Trail. The proposed development forms an ideal gradient in height from the buildings to the east and south of it. A fifty-foot limit has been preserved along Osceola Avenue. Through the liberal use of setbacks, stepbacks and lowered rooflines, decks, the structure of the building has been broken up to decrease the appearance of massiveness across the entire development. n LA • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOQTRIANGLEDEVELORMENT QOM • 23 OF 34 • • • •F Tri 1e SEP • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC OR?GINAL • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater T? PLArJN?i TM ELOPMENTSVC, Its urban character respects and enhances Downtown's built environment and heritage. Historical references are usein°""'"° a context of modern design, forming a blend that does not look out of place in its surroundings, while preserving a very • specific design identity of its own. • The proximity of the site to the Pinellas Trail (two blocks) means that provision will be made in the building itself for • secure bicycle and stroller storage. This is another reason the location is so good; and it means increased usage of the Trail. • • The extensive street level and cross-block arcades will enhance comfortable pedestrian travel. It must be noted that the proximity of the building to so many key locations in downtown (Library, City Hall, Publix, Steinmart and so on) mean • that the opportunity actually exists for people to walk to places and not use their vehicles. This approaches an ideal scene for a true urban environment. • • Prohibited Uses • Automobile service stations, all types of vehicle sales and services, fast food restaurants with drive-through service, adult • uses, industrial and problematic uses (examples include, but are not limited to, day labor, pawn shops, check cashing and blood plasma centers and body piercing and tattoo parlors). None of these uses are planned for this site. • • Downtown Design Guidelines • • New Construction, Parts I, II and III. • These Guidelines have been approved by the City Council and they form a strong basis for the design of this project. The • document is very thorough and the developers believe the design of the proposed project aligns strictly with the spirit and intent of the vision of the document. Any suggestions that may be made so the developer can adhere more closely • to the appropriate characteristics would be gratefully received. • Brief mention will be made here of the most pertinent points. Quotations from the Guidelines are shown in italics. • Access, Circulation and Parking • Parking lots and garages should be as unobtrusive as possible while maintaining easy accessibility. • • Appropriate: Parking areas for townhouse developments located within the interior of the development that maintain the integrity of the primary facade as the preferred design; attached garages /n residential developments, architecturally • integrated with the design of the principal structure... • Full details of the operation of the automatic parking garage are the subject of the accompanying White Paper. • Architecturally, the proposed design calls for an enclosed and concealed automatic parking garage in the center of the • site, with the facade treatment designed to hide motor cars from any view and to disguise the use of the facility. In fact, residential units will be built on top of the building, and false fronts will be provided to the portion on Osceola and on the • Waterway side, so no trace of "garage" will be seen. The only clues to its use will be signage seen on Osceola Avenue • and entrance and exit openings for vehicles. Site Elements • Buffering and Screening • Buffering and screening help define spaces, block unsightly yet necessary elements and preserve and enhance an area's • quality and character. Within an urban setting buffering will be achieved through the use of landscaping, decorative • fences, walls, pots, TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRIsON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAx: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(')TRIAN JLEOEVELOPMENT.COM • . 24 OF 34 • • • T r Ii g 1 e S EP , 0 2005 OR?iGAA m DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater p?(yN1NG & 0EVEL0R`,AE-NT $VC$ .,_._:. CITY OF CI.,E.AR.Wi`i.rE.9 • planters, etc: • Appropriate: When located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment that is integrated into the design of the • building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements; service and loading areas accessed from secondary streets, screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way and placed in visually unobtrusive locations • Mechanical equipment will be concealed on roof level, and internally or in areas of the site buffered with landscaping. • Landscaping Landscaping should be used as a design element fully integrated with a site and building while also recognizing and • defining the urban setting. A well designed landscape contributes to the site's aesthetics and improves the livability in a • dense urban environment. Landscaping can also preserve and enhance the acoustic and visual privacy of a site while supporting and accentuating the architecture of a building. The use of indigenous species and other water-saving techniques are encouraged. • Appropriate: Landscaping compatible with the climatic conditions of West Central Florida that includes the use of native • plant species and Xenscape landscape techniques; Landscape design which enhances and supports architectural features of the building/site where located; Landscape design that visually screens unsightly views, strengthens important vistas • and reinforces the character district in which it is located; Plantings in landscape beds, planters or pots that soften the edges between buildings and pedestrian areas, Trees planted in paved areas provided with adequate room to grow • (landscape beds, tree grates or other protective techniques). • Appropriate and full landscaping is an important element of the design. See attached Landscape Plan. • • Fences and Walls • Fences and walls shall be utilized around service/loading areas, dumpsters and mechaninWutility equipment to buffer these uses from surrounding properties and rights of-way and to provide security for this equipment. • The service areas are largely internal in this development. • Fences and walls may be incorporated as a design element to assist in defining property boundaries and entrances, open • spaces and to pro vide a transition between public and private realms • Appropriate: Fences and walls that complement and are consistent with the pr incipal structure with regards to materials, • texture, size, shape and color • In most cases the buildings themselves form the wall to the development of Harrison Village. An appropriate fence is planned for Island View. • • II. BUILDING PLACEMENT • Orientation Buildings should be oriented towards the street. The orientation of the front facade of buildings along the streetscape contributes to pedestrian interest in an area. A high percentage of ground coverage is encouraged in a downtown to • create a critical mass of activity. See Site Plan. Buildings take a very urban stance towards the surrounding streets, especially Fort Harrison, with the retail and commercial component orienting towards this busy thoroughfare. • • III. BUILDING DESIGN Successful building design is a marriage between form and architecture to visually connect with the existing and/or desired character of the surrounding area. A compatible structure is one that possesses patterns of form and architecture that are found in surrounding buildings creating 'points of agreement' between them while retaining the • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENLIE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • 25 OF 34 • p?TUU? 0 R ?, G T g e SEP 3? 2005 iN A DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PLANNING & DEVELOP, -j±:,N f SVCS • _ CITY OF Cl. E A» ;WA TLq individuality of the building. Quality urban design balances a respect for an area's existing or desired pattern with the • design of new structures Appropriate: Buildings that have a distinct "base ; "middle"and "cap ; Low-rise buildings and/or those with long facade • widths that accentuate vertical elements such as entrances and columns, or by breaking up the facade plane into a greater number of smaller vertical masses, Mid- and high-rise buildings that utilize horizontal elements that minimize the • apparent height ofa building such as balconies, banding, cornice and parapet lines, etc. • These architectural tricks are used in full to break up a larger building into more comprehensible masses, with horizontal divisions to minimize height, and vertically to make the building even more urban in scale. The development is broken • down into finer detail by porticoes which announce and celebrate "entrance", clock towers on the busiest corners and pediments which refer to traditional symbols of residence. The buildings have a very definite division into base, middle • and cap. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Architecture The architectural style of new development or development should be consistent with the desired development in the surrounding Character Districts.. A variety of architectural styles exist within the Downtown and the Guidelines should not prescribe any one architectural style as being the most appropriate. New buildings may use a variety of architectural styles as appropriate to the intended use of the building and the context of the surrounding area. New design may use contemporary materials to adapt historic design elements into a new building. Various architectural elements that may be found on a building 1 - Cornice 11 12 1 2 - Lintel 3-Sill 10 2 4 - String course 5 -Transom 6 - Bulk heads s 3 7 - Kick plates 8 - Double door entrance 8 4 9 - Fixed plate glass display window 10 - Double-hung sash window s 5 11 - Parapet 12 - Parapet coping All the appropriate elements referred to above are used in this design. Facade Design A# facades of a building should reflect a unified architectural treatment; however, there is a hierarchy of facade treatment based on location, function and level of pedestrian interaction. Facades should use a combination of architectural details, materials, window and door patterns and other design features to form a cohesive and visually interesting design. The proposed buildings, both on Island View and Harrison Village, have hierarchies of facades. Primary and Corner Facades Buildings on corner lots at the intersections of streets designated on the Master Streetscape Plan are considered to have two primary facades and should receive the highest level of design treatment on those facades Appropriate: The primary facades as the most highly designed facade utilizing the following elements A change in plane, building wall projection or recess, architectural details; variety in color, material, texture, doors and/or windows, an architecturally prominent entrance with door located on the primary facade. This has been complied with in this proposal. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO()TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 26 OF 34 D L L?L?UUV It 1 • ORIGINAL Tr1. g1e sEpar,2Ca5 ? • r DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PLANNING & DEVELOP AIENT SVCS PTY r M4i ARWArER _....... • Primary entrances emphasized through the use of a combination of.• projection or recession in the building footprint, • variation in building height, canopy or portico; raised cornice or parapet over door... • This has been complied with in this proposal. Primary facade, in keeping with established patterns, which include three articulated architectural parts a base, middle • and cap. The proportion of these three elements will vary depending on the scale of the building. • This has been complied with in this proposal. Major architectural treatments on the principal building facade that are continued around all sides of the building that are . visible from the public realm. Buildings on corner lots that emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features This has been complied with on this proposal, with corners of the Harrison Village site being articulated by a special unit wit an octagonal deck on the corner. These clock towers have been located to provide landmarks for the development. • The corner location on the Island View site is also one of the entrances, so has had special attention put on it in design. • Secondary Facades A secondary facade faces alleys, parking areas and Old Bay district properties along Clearwater Harbor The level of design along a secondary facade, while perhaps not as intense as a primary facade should continue the architectural • style of the building and use the same quality of materials On Island View the waterfront face of the building will receive the same level of detailing as the others. There are no secondary facades at Harrison Village. Windows and Doors Windows are a vital element which link the private (space within a building) and public space (such as streets, sidewalks, etc.) realms visually drawing passersby into buildings Doors are also a vital element providing not only visual but, • physical connections between the public and private realms At street level, for the entire length and breadth of Harrison Village, and in its arcades, pedestrians will enjoy visual and physical access into the building through storefronts and windows on the retail and commercial component. Along the Osceola portion of Harrison Village, the pedestrian experience will be a friendly one. Osceola Avenue will become a • pleasant tree-shaded street to stroll. Lush landscaping, planters and railings will separate public and private spaces. Roof Design • • Roof forms are one of the most highly visible components of a building. Not only do they provide a vital function but they contribute and are integral to the overall building design through the use of distinctive, defined styles and • decorative patterns and colors The style of the development, Mediterranean Revival, calls for smaller mansard roofs and trellises as well as pediments, • and these are use to break the scale of the building by providing roof lines at varying heights across the facade. Other Architectural Features A variety of other features can provide the perfect accent or finish to a building or, conversely, ruin an otherwise • wonderful structure. These may include door handles and hinges, mail slots, docks, fir%mergency escapes, shutters, awnings etc. The same amount of thought and care should be put into the selection and installation of these features as for more obvious features such as roofs, doors and windows • All the above are featured in the proposed development. Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes and the like will be handled • within the parameters of the Downtown Design Guidelines. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INF'O(dTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • . 27 OF 34 • Q}{ /'?'? (It '1iW9 0 R V• N A L J r..,,,OPMENT COMPANY, LLCI N R D i 7 P • _ M1! D Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ? SE P 5 'P 2??5 l Materials and Color PLANNING & DEVELOPi r tJ f SVCS t.?...? QTY OF CL l„ NAIER Materials • The correct choices of building materials are paramount in the success of any building. Materials should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building to which they belong. The building is will be constructed in concrete masonry units with a stucco finish. Stucco banding, cornices and window detailing will be used. Relief and contrast from this texture will occur in windows and trellises which have a smoother finish. All surfaces will be painted or self-colored stone. The base of the building will be finished to emulate courses of stone blocks. Color • The color palette of a building is composed of the colors of the main body of the building, trim and accent colors: The colors chosen for awnings, canopies, shutters and roofs also contribute to the overall color scheme of building. The • overall color scheme of a building or project should reflect a cohesive pattern. These guidelines recognize that the review of a buildings color scheme is a balance between an owners creativity and individuality, the architectural style of the building and an overall harmonious vision for the Downtown. The use ofa single color on all surfaces should be avoided. A two- or three-color scheme is encouraged to provide visual appeal. The main body color should be the predominant color of the building. The color tone of the main body should be guided by the size and height of the building, its • location (corner or interior lot), and architectural style. The trim color is applied to architectural elements such as windows, doors, columns, porches etc The trim color should be a lighter or darker tone of the main body color, a complimentary color to the main body color or a neutral color In a three color scheme, the accent color should be used • sparingly to highlight certain architectural elements such as a front door or awning. • The color scheme is conceived as basically a three-color scheme with tones of terracotta, cream, ochre and mustard, offset by accents of deeper hue. Lighter tones will be used to accentuate advancing planes with the color tone becoming progressively stronger on the building planes away from the street. The entrance porticoes will signal their function and • importance with the strongest, or most contrasting color. Window and doorframes will be darker. Pediments and parapets will be the lightest color to outline the building against the sky. Contrasting color awnings will provide accent • points. Trellises will be a lighter color to set off the greenery growing over them. The base of the building will have a finish of contrasting three-dimensional colored banding which will have the appearance of horizontal stone coursing (blocks). • • • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO?TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 28 OF 34 T r i (}}l?? l e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Existing Conditions (Already demolished structures noted) ]ones from Osceola to Fort i L: -•? - Fort Harrison looking west -?z PLANNING& DEVELOFiAEP4I SVC$ ?- Georgia Street, north side of Harrison Village and Island View g TRIAN13LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO TRIAN6LEDEVELOPMENT QOM 29 OF 34 T Nirg l e 'r DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater North Osceola Avenue looking east PLANNING & DEVELOP- I SVCS TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOnTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 30 OF 34 North Osceola Avenue looking west Tr i 1 e g DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater F TRIAN13LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO\^WTRIANCLEDEVELOPMENT COM Iii 31 OF 34 PLANNING& avw Locality Plan (Aerial photograph with project overlay) F.R. ORgGINAL Tr-g 1 e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, I.LC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Comparative Analysis of Approved Request and Present Application Harrison Village, Island View (Approved at CDB 19 3uly 2005) HV and IV site area Retail/commercial area Area available after adjustment for FAR Units Units allowed after subtracting FAR area Request from Density Pool 216,543sf 4.97acres 18,893 sf 0.43 acres 178,757 sf 324 205 119 Parking total 503 Parking for residents @ 1.5/unit 486 Parking for retail @ 0/1,000 sf 0 Balance 17 Harrison Village, Island View (Request 30 September 2005) HV and IV site area Retail/commercial area Area available after adjustment for FAR Units Units allowed after subtracting FAR area Request from Density Pool 211,626 sf 4.86 acres 27,168 sf 0.62 acres 157,290 sf 324 181 143 Parking total 533 Parking for residents @ 1.5/unit 486 Parking for retail @ 2/1,000 sf 54 Balance 93 D .. LID 12035 I » 'LANNING & DEVELOP= 74 r SVCS --QTY AF CI,-EARWr" iQ9 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCO-)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 32 OF 34 1 1,4 Tri le ? ORiGINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 11 Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Special Note on Traffic Tv It i 72-uZ5 't y;fve?i TRIAN13LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO a-)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 33 OF 34 • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • yep zd ZUUa l.-aurm IaU•JULU t'- uL Gulf Cyst Rusulfixog, Inc. Lmd DeveJOPWeW CMouiting • EuOne vi ing • Pleutoning • Tft""ftaflm - Per Wtdag ICOT Center 13825 COT Boulevard, Sufte 606 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 624.1618 Fax: (727) 524-6090 September 28, 2005 Mr. Bemmet Elbo City of Clearwater Traffic Engineering Division 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, F133756 RE: Harrison Village - Island View Dear Mr. Elbo: On July 19, 2005 the CDB approved Harrison Village-Island View for 324 condominiumhownhouse units and 18,893 square feet of specialty retail. (FLD 2005- 04034) The traffic analysis submitted in April 2005 with that application predicted the project would generate 175 PM peak hour trips. The applicant is resubmitting to increase the specialty retail to 27,000 square feet, in addition to the 324 condominium units. The corresponding trip generation would increase to 194 PM peak hour trips, which is only a 19 trip increase over the approved plans. We are requesting a waiver to preparing a new traffic study for this application due to the minimal change in traffic generation. In addition, Fort Harrison Avenue is operating at LOS C. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, f t? Robert Pergolizzi, CP Principal Cc Don Stanish Thomas Coates 04055 D PUANNING & NvELQP. INT SVCS CE tLUAt1AYE-R .. Tr1 gle ..DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Attachment A Street Addresses and Parcel Numbers HARRISON VILLAGE Common Name Street Address Former Markopoulos property 400, 410 Jones Street and 303 N Osceola Avenue Former Salvation Army 410 N Fort Harrison and 309 N Osceola Avenue ISLAND VIEW Former Osceola Bay property Former Rahddert property 302, 304, 308 N Osceola Avenue 312, 314, 400, 404 N Osceola Avenue Letter Clarifying Ownership Proof of Ownership Island View (Old Osceola Bay, 302-308 N Osceola) Special Warranty Deed Proof of Ownership Island View (Old Rahddert property, 312-404 N Osceola) Agreement of Purchase Proof of Ownership Harrison Village (Old Markopoulos property) Bill of Sale Proof of Ownership Harrison Village (Old Salvation Army site) Title Information (HUD Settlement Statement) 53370/ 53370/ 00000/ 00000/ 00000/ 14310/ 14310/ 000/ 0010 000/ 0020 430/ 0600 430/ 0500 430/ 0400 000/ 0100 000/ 0080 C'I' ? n Zv15 PLAN ? ? C L l?r:s A FL TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 305 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOPO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 'JRiGINAC Parcel Numbers 09/29/151 • 44352/ 002/ 0012 09/29/15/ 44352/ 002/ 0010 09/29/15/ 44352/ 002/ 0020 09/29/15/ 14310/ 000/ 0010 09/29/15/ 00000/ 430/ 0300 09/29/15/ 09/29/15/ 09/29/15/ 09/29/15/ 09/29/15/ 09/29/15/ 09/29/15/ 34 OF 34 • • a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 II •' ?F)c September 26, 2005 clesrvrAer City of Clearwater This letter is to clarify the intent with regards to certain properties owned by Triangle Old Bay Holdings LLC ("Old Bay") and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Old Bay's majority owner is Ron Pollack, and it is managed by Triangle Property Holding LL.C, which is jointly owned by Ron Pollack and Ben Kugler. Specifically at this time the property parcels marked below as 1, 2, 10 & 4 are being developed. The thin strip of land dividing 4 in two is the proposed new Osceola Ave, which we plan to dedicate to the city. Properties 1, 2, 10 and the part of property 4 west of the new Osceola Ave will be deeded to Island View Condominiums. Data on nronerties being developed by Triangle Old Day Holdings- .sr ., 7,M; - ?Pji.'?4:j *?J!`•??_2i`•k ?i ?,LPtE iA%?j. 4 '. ws.. INS, c c 0 ORIGINAL --------------------- 1•d SEZS-SZL-LZL S.>10eliod dE1=90 So 9Z des ORGNA? ?t Old Bay is using Triangle Development Company LLC (also jointly owned by Ron Pollack and Ben IZtialer) to develop its properties. Ownership information: The data on the relevant properties shown above are as follows: 1. Name: former Rhaddert property: 310-404 N. Osceola. Size: 1.9 acres Owner: Georgia Street Properties LLC (wholly owned by Old Bay). 2. Name: former Ellenbera property: 302-308 N. Osceola. Size: 1.0 acres Owner: Island View Properties LLC (wholly owned by Old Bay). 4. Name: former Salvation Army property: (part of what was once) 300-410 N. Fort Harrison, and 3) 09-407 N. Osceola. Size: 2.42 acres Owner: Triangle S.A. Land LLC (wholly owned by Old Bay). 10. Name: former Mareopoufos property: (part of what was once) 303&305 N'. Osceola, and 400&41.0 Jones St. Size: 0.2 acres Owner: Harrison Village Properties LLC (wholly owned by Old Bay). Sincerely, r? Ron Pollack CEO and Manager Triangle Development Company LLC For- Triangle Property Holdings LLC, Manager For: Triangle Old Bay Holdings, Owner 17 Ft' i PLANNING g OEVRC)O •'• ,`<! SvCSI CITY Ai- CU'4,-`4: , AIx 3 2'd 9629-92L-LZL slmoeiiod db1=90 so 92 das • $27.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $19250.00 KARLEEN F. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDMC6 .0 0 :Pr9pared By and Return To: • tLynette Rushton • I Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 58,10 W. Cypress Street, Suite #E • Tampa, FL 33607 • File No. 04-054-1402870 • Property Appraiser's Parcel I.D. (folio) Number (s) • 09129/15/00000/430/0600 • SS#: • _ _ • ____ _ --- DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT eR,sINA[. ?rr' r ? w•rr I 1. 1. PUNNING & DEVELQP%4 f • SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED • THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED made this June 9, 2004, by Osceola Bay Development, LLC, a Nevada Limited • Liability Company hereinafter called the grantor and 302-308 N. Osceola Properties, LLC, a Florida limited liability • company, whose post office address is 133 Candy Lane , Palm Harbor, Florida 34683, hereinafter called the grantee: • (Wherever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to the instrument and • the heirs, legal representative and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations) • WITNESSETH: That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable consideration, • receipt, whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and • confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situated in Pinellas County, Florida viz: • See Legal Description Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. • Subject to encumbrances, easements and restrictions of record and taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2003. • • TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in any wise appertaining. • TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. • AND the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; • that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the said grantor. • • • • ?v • C-4, • • Speclsl Womrrty Deed ICorpororian) Sav.112/02)(Smorp.Wpol Pe9B 1 01 Z • 0 • o T-e ORIGINAL s o r sx l JVC PLAN 11Y o?E r C. ," IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, by its proper officers duly authorized, the day and year first above written. ATTEST: igne, sealedd 0t4ered,,.3a the presence of: a G C`: i? C? it es rin Name Witness Signature Witness Printed Name Osceola Bay Development, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company By: Matrix Lodging, L.L.C., a Nevada limited liability, com ny, as its Managing Member By: Ellenburg Fall, LLC, a Florida limited liabilitmpany --11 k-11-A /$y: Gerald D. enburg, 8 S Fort Harrison Ave., , C>lar4ater, Fl- 33756 CAROM B! M Ry W COMMISSION i DO 2972011 t-` D EXPIRES: May 3,20MOB STATE OF COUNTY OF f7 ?LL?S+?Ou?? I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly autho .zed in the t e aforesaid and in the County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally lappeored 5 L?? 6u to me known to be the .4 6--, respectively of the corporation named as the grantor in the foregoing deed, or who have produced _ L 1 as identification and that they severally acknowledged executing the same in the presence of two subscribing witnesses freely and voluntarily under the authority duly vested in them by said corporation and that the seal affixed thereto is the true corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last oresa?d is g day of u /J4 2z29 Nary Public Printed Name of Notary Spcdel war.b,ry Deed lcorpw=lonl R-112j0211SPcwP-wPd1 Page 2 of 2 • R" NA L • . - lfi Ci ent 5. 17. jtjtj • I.. .}\v F! F -l • • • • • • • • • • • • PLANNING 8 DES's- LU I SvcS VTY OF Ql- LB • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 19 , PLgN.NiPESCIRW & ?ji l SV CS. C.(.'11' C1 I.EGaL ?D iWiH(T -A- • ORIGINAL Parcel : Lots A and B of CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION according to the map or plot thereof as recorded in Plat Book 35, Page 76. Public Records of Pinellas County: Florida. y Together with all submerged lands, bay bottoms, and riparian rights thereunto appertaining or in anywise belonging, more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Notthwct comerof CLOVIS C. LUTZ-SUBDIV[SION as recorded in Plat Book. 35, Page 76, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and nut thence S. 12 degrees 06' 16" W. along the Westerly line orsaid Subdivision. 65.48 feet to the southwest comer of said Subdivision;. thence S 89 degrees 54' 00" W 630,0 feet more or less to the Easterly boundary of the channel in Clearwater Bay; thence Northerly, along the Easterly boitttdary of said channel, to an intersection with the Westerly extension of the Northerly line of said CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION; thence Easterly, along the Westerly extension of the said Northerly tine, 637.0 feet more or less to the point of beginning. The above described property is subject to an easement to the Wort Coast inland Navigation District on that part lying within 25b feet of the reciter line of the West Coast Intracoastal Wateiway Canal, containing 0.7 acre more or less. That part ofa certain (10) feet of unnamed alley extending West to the waters of Clearwater Harbor from the West right-of-way of Osceola Avenue and lying south of-the Freilm property and lying North of Lo( A ofCLOVIS C, LUTZ SUBDIVISION as'worded in Plat Book 35, Page 76, public records of Pinellas County; Florida. Said alley having been vapatcd b. the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida, and being the same property as shown on Quit Claim Deed from A.K. Freiler and Sarah May Freilcr, his Wife, in OR. 589, page 289. -Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida A parcel of submerged land in Clearwater Harbor in Section 9, Township 29 South. Range 15 EasL Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Northwest comer of Lot A of the CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION as recorded in Plat Book 35. Page 76, public records of Pinellas County, Florida, said point being on the average high water line of Clearwater Harbor, said Point of Beginning being 555.97 feet North and 1949.66 feet West of the Southeast comer of said Section 9. From aforesaid P.O.B. run thence N 89 dogrees 24' 16" W 282.41 feet to the City of Clearwater Bulkhead Line; thence run N 07 degrees 28' 50" East 10.07 feet.along said Bulkhead Line; run thence South 99 degrees 24'.16" East 28121 feet to the average high water I ine of Clearwater Harbor, runt thence South 00 degrees 38' 00" West 10.00 feet along'said average high water line to the P.O.B. reel is From the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Scction.9. Township 29 South, Range 15 Fast; run West 398.68 feet to the West line of Osct.-ola Avenue; thence North 0 degrees 38' East along the West line of Osceola Avenue 545.68 feet to the North line of an alley as shown in JONES SUBDIVISION to the Town of Clearwater. Florida; thence East 58.0 feet to Point of Beginning; thence North 83.16 feet more or less; thence West 250.55 feet, more or less, to the waters of Clearwater Bay; thence South 22.5 deg. West 90.01 feet more or less to a point 285 feet West of the Point of Beginning; thence East 285.0 feet to Point of Beginning. Together with all submerged land and riparian rights appurtenant to said tract described as follows: Tract 23, from an incenection of the North line of Jones Strcet and the West line of Osceola Avenue of JONES SUBDIVISION in Clearwater, Florida; run North along West line of Osceola Avenue 190 feet: thence West 213.9 felt to average high water line arClcatwater Bay to Point of Beginning: thence 725 fset to channel in Clearwater Bay; thence Northeasterly along Fast side of channel a distance of 83.17 feet due North. thence Fast 725 feet to average high hater line of Clearwatx;r Bay; thence in a southwesterly course along the average high water line to Point of Beginning. LESS that portion described in that certain Order for Taking riled 1-13-61 in O.R. Book 108 3. page 97, public records of Pinellas County, Florida. ORiGINAL . Er;F=; 1i='E =r1 !_ F r5? -.-sc; -? _ ?4 1 ; . 02 . • - Prop Adds- I_ISCE O L PROPER. T I ES L-11_ A 1 . i AND LN I=: PALM HARBOR. =T -i_ 4GO_ 54 1. ICOLFit I'`r'7 • E lilp± 1 _. 4. rlio • i-d ::t Yr. 0SCE0 LA '" VE 1,,' Use l=odes - 2'2 =1?; Esc. r"eta I_iR. Fk - 1 6 5Cj Gp; ?j-- PARTINERSH I PS--* ETC Light Dist; •rln- Ar)r)ex Dist. Tax Am X004 D i s t. CIvI Spec Dist: If No Cap. -c-_mii4 VALUE 1 E„erriptiOns Areae Ew If No E_n„ SS•.- • v LL = .± ; M ar:et. C; ri(,f= .. 9 HX _i Paid Date. - • _ K!X i-i I_, P - tv vflijr_j '2( f? mi 11 A ._; r_ s=aed ),a.a a ?.?c,, f_;c_!i_; . Fix . `_ U Pct n . 000 Ta- ,., D 1 q • T X i ? '.? P ? t ? „ i i (_1 r,"7 T ._y i; ;`-j ;? t a • a :•: ;?. ?1 I G v _l i ) t) y V I rl = t ii 1 .00C .Y. n 1 T't 1 1 L? 1. C SR r41 • I,,%i-rERSEC _ R ' R/L4 GEORGIA ST i:. W R/W OSCE OLI^i AVE TH Appi Area; ^ c.! . 7t? - ^tii )FT W FT FOR POB TH S = 4F T TH LJ :'27i_iF-F, S i TO * IIOR; LEGALJ EX IST x t • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ^ n r i a ORIGINAL 11 ! f4 C-1 r.j 14 f h1 '_ _ - - -- -- _!!?. ?'r_1f_i •':J 111 .-. t, I_:!'i `_? , - - _ -.- E. c _v- t 1.? i I W I.'-'! I'-I f _.1 d is _t Z • .i I_i. .. ?'!?! '?: t-.:?I.r_ .,:: B. 5.. 4 I_ I :_ 4- a . i _ _i j_ ij !-!gin-! 1 I-'>f 11 :. . C l f-` I-J -t'.-: r='L" D Lao .1..:=!. :':fan ! in a L:i°i a ! _ .. .. ... y .. _ _ _. F • L. i I T _. i_ t.; wi T. U ' 14" E c L•' '- • • • rp ?! PLANNING OEVFI-O+ , f? 5'JC5 • • AiGINAL • . PARC EL A LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11 & ALL OF GEORGIA STREET LYING NOR TH OF SAID LOT 8, A.B. & JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 64 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. • TOGETHER WITH: . • PARC EL B BEGINNING WHERE THE WEST LINE OF NORTH OSCEOLA STREET, IN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, OR THE WEST LINE OF SAID STREET EXTENDED NORTH AS SAID NORTH OSCEOLA STREET EXISTED ON OCTOBER 8, 1894, • INTERSECTS THE SOUTH LINE OF A THREE ACRE TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY OWNED BY MARY C. NICHOLSON, WHICH SAID TRACT IS DESCRIBED AS (BEGINNING 17.85 CHAINS WEST AND 8.28 CHAINS NORTH OF THE S.E. CORNER OF SEC. 9, TWP. 29 S., RANGE 15 E, THENCE NORTH 2.52 CHAINS TO A STAKE, THENCE RUN WEST 11.40 CHAINS TO A AT LOW WATER MARK ON CLEARWATER BAY, THENCE SOUTHERLY STAKE • , ALONG THE MEANDERINGS OF SAID BAY 2.75 CHAINS MORE OR LESS TO A POINT DUE WEST OF THE STARTING; THENCE EAST 12.40 CHAINS MORE OR LESS TO A POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 3 ACRES MORE OR LESS; THENCE RUN EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NICHOLSON TRACT 58 FT. FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 84 FT., THENCE EAST 70 FT., THENCE SOUTH 84 FT., THENCE EAST 70 FT., THENCE SOUTH 84 FT., THENCE WEST 70 FT. TO POINT OF BEGINNING, IT BEING THE INTENTION HEREBY TO CONVEY THE LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY J.E. ELDRIDGE TO JAMES E. • BEARING AND ROSE B. SCARLING BY DEED DATED APRIL 10, 1922, FILED SAME DATE, AND RECORDED IN DEED RECORD 116, PAGE 67, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PARC EL C ALSO, BEGIN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF, THE TRACT OF LAND HERETOFORE DESCRIBED AND HEREBY CONVEYED, RUN THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT 37 FEET 6 INCHES FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT WESTERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT, THENCE SOUTHE 7 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO POINT OF BEGINNING, BEING A TRIANGULAR PIECE OF LAND, IT BEING THE INTENTION BY THIS DESCRIPTION TO CONVEY THAT CERTAIN SMALL TRIANGULAR PARCEL OF LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER TO JAMES B. SCARING BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 13, 1922, FILED DECEMBER 14, 1922, RECORDED IN DEED RECORD 133, PAGE 483, PU LIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. D ? TOGETHER WITH. I,1 1 .? t TANNING& DEVI ,^_-,-.. I s°iCsi ORIGINAL PARCEL D BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, COUNTY OF PINELLAS, STATE OF FLORIDA, WHERE THE WEST LINE OF OSC EOLA AVENUE INTERSECTS THE SOUTH LINE OF GEORGIA STREET; RUN THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE 200 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT ELEVEN (11), OF CATES SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY,. FLORIDA, FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID OSC EOLA AVENUE 49 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WHAT IS KNOWN AS THE OLD JOHN E. LAMBETH PROPERTY, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID LAMBETH LINE TO THE HIGH WATER MARK ON CLEARWATER BAY, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID HIGH WATER MARK TO SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) OF SAID CATES' SUBDIVISION. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, TOGETHER WITH, PARC EL E THOSE SUBMERGED LANDS DESCRIBED IN OR BOOKS 3515, PAGE 221, OR 3557, PAGE 559 AND OR 1324, PAGE 520 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. D 1, PIANN1hJG 8 C'?= ^:? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • m 7.13 OS ? • AWIIT? ORIGINAL BILL OF SALE 1. Sale and Transfer of Assets and Contract Rights. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and as contemplated by Section 5(b) of that certain Commercial Contract entered on or about January 26, 2004 (the "Sale Agreement"), to which Antonios Markopoulos, Gulfview Restaurant, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Zeus Inn, Inc., a Florida corporation (individually and collectively, the "Seller"), and Osceola-Jones Properties LLC, a Florida limited liability company (the "Purchaser"), are parties, Seller hereby sells, transfers, assigns, conveys, grants and delivers to Purchaser, effective as of April 14, 2004 (the "Closing Date"), all of each Seller's right, title and interest in and to all of the assets of each respective Seller (the "Assets") located at or on that real property described on Exhibit A hereto. exc /, ,? 1 2. Further Actions. Seller and Purchaser agree to take all steps reasonably necessary to establish the record of Purchaser's title to the Assets and, at the request of Purchaser, to execute and deliver further instruments of transfer and assignment and take such other action as Purchaser may reasonably request to more effectively transfer and assign to and vest in Purchaser each of the Assets, all at the sole cost and expense of Seller. ?. Miscellaneous. 3.1. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be solely governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of Florida without regard to any principles of conflict of laws. The Seller and the Purchaser agree that venue of all lawsuits, disputes or actions involving or relating to this Bill of Sale or its interpretation or enforcement shall lie in courts having jurisdiction within Pinellas County, Florida, and federal courts having jurisdiction within the Middle District of Florida, and each party agrees to submit to the jurisdiction of said courts. 3.2. Headings for Reference Only. The section and paragraph headings in this Bill of Sale are for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to modify or limit the provisions of this Bill of Sale or affect the meaning or be used in interpretation of this Bill of Sale. A ti 4? i {l i INNING & DEVU'.,V rA Y AE 0 ORIGINAL 3.3. Authority. By execution of this Bill of Sale, each person represents and warrants his right, ability and authority to sign and bind his principal to all terms and provisions of this Bill of Sale, and each party may fully rely thereon without verification. WI ESS WHEREOF, Seller has executed this Bill of Sale as of April 14, 2004. Antomos Markopoulos GULF ST URANT, INC. By: Antonios arkopoulo's President ZEU C. By: Antonios s arkopoulos, President YLe-J 4t 4, 0 sc-col, -W l ?, ?,?s LLB c? S'e-Y) CE-0 C77 ZE7 2-6"'J3 GBDE'VLO-I .. i SVCS' Y OF ae. ? ` `. > 2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ORIGINAL Exhibit 'A° PARCEL #1: The West 2/3 of Lott. Block2, JONES SUBDIVISION OF NiCHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, according to the plat thereof as recorded In Flat Book 1, page.13, of the public records of Hillsborough County. Florida of which Pinellas County was formerly a partaf, LESS the Northwest comer and being more partlcularty described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest comer of lot 2, Block 2, of said JONES SUBDIVISION for a Point of Beginning; thence North Mo 2310" West. along the West Ilne of said Lot 2,163.80 feet: thence Northeastady along a curve (saw curve having a radius of 45.00 feet, a tangent of 8.07feet; a chord of 15.88 feet, a chord bear ft North 490 42'46' East), a distance of 15.96 feet; thence North 896 41'0fr East, along the Not line of said Lot 2, 41.77 feet thence South 00 ° 2WW East. 160.00 feet; thence South 890 41'W West 53.95 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL #2: The South 76 feet of Lot 1, Block 2, JONE'S SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, according to the plat thereof recorded In Flat Book i. page 13, of the public records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly a part together with that certain tract of land lying between the West tine of the above degcnbed land and the East rightW-way Wre of Osceola Avenue, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida PARCEL #3_ Beginning at the Southeast comer of Lot 1, Block 2, of JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HAR13OR according to the corrected map or plat thereof reeomW in Plat Book 1, page 13. of the public records of HlBsborough Cot mty, Florida, of which Pinellas County was fonTwfy a part; nm thimce North 0 ° 23W West. Mang the East One of sold Lot 1,157 feet for a Point of Booming; thence South 79° 24'06' West, 80.28 feet, thence South 0* 44W West. 12.21 feet: thence East, parallel to the South Una of said lot, 7925 fee;, more or less. to the East line of said lot; thence North along the East Une of said lot, 27 feet„ more or less, to the Point of 1BegknnIr4 r' { r,LL CyQr C;:... /r1v ••a G711 , P U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN VELOPMENT B. TYPE OF LOA N SETTLEMENT ST 'ENT 1 ? FHA 2 FMHA 3 ® Astro Title Ser'Clces h i c. . CO., UNINS , 510 N. Fort Harrison Aven 4. ? VA 5. CONV.INS. Clearwater, Florida 3375 6 FI ENUMBER: 7 LOAN NUMBER 7681-PI-04 6 MORTGAOEINS CASENO.: n/a C. NOTE: This form is furnished to give you a stateme ' ' t f actual settlement costs. Amounts paid to and by the settlement agent are shown Items marked (p.o.c.) were paid outside the closing, the . re shown here for informational purposes and are not included in the totals. D. NAME OF BORROWER: Triangle S.A. Land, LLC Limited Liability Co. Registration no. ADDRESSOF BORROWER: L05000077223 305 N. Ft Harrison Aver e Clearwater, Florida 33755 ORIGI E. NAME OF SELLER: The Salvation Army a Ge r NAL is Corporation aDDRESSOF SELLER: 1625 Belcher Road North , Clearwater FL 33757 F. NAME OF LENDER: SunTrust Bank , D ADDRESSOF LENDER: 401 E. Jackson Street Tampa, FL 33602 ft G. PROPERTY LocnrloN: 309 Osceola Avenue and 4 1 N. Ft. Harrison Ave Clearwater, Florida 3375 H. SETTLEMENTAGENT: Astro Title Services, Inc. &DEV'rE.L r0r•, PLACEOF SETTLEMENT: 510 N. Fort Harrison Ave e C. Qr Clearwater, Florida 33755 A? Y. 1. SETTLEMENT DATE: August 31, 2005 J. SUMMARY OF BORROWER'S TRANSA CTIO K. SUMMARY OF SELLER'S TRANSA CTION 100 039AANI. OT .P.P. div1 BOt?ApWfF. : Gftf35S_i?lMt?t1NT';E?U1+ CC? S GTI tt. 101. Contract sales price. . , 0 . 0, UU0 00` 401. Contract'saless price 2, 600, 000.00 102. Personal property 402. Personal property 103. Settlement charges to borrower: 403. (from line 1400) 2 7,19 5.25 104. 404. 105. 405. ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS PAID BY SELLER IN A DVAN CE : ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS PAID BY SELLER IN A DVANCE: 106. city/town taxes to ` 466. City/town taxes to 107. County taxes to 407. County taxes to 108. Assessments to 408. Assessments to 109. 409. 110. 410. 111. 411. 112• 412. 120. GROSS AMOUNT DUE FROM BORROWER: ? 2, 7 195.25 420. GROSS AMOUNT DUE TO SELLER: ? 2, 600, 000.00 700. A7 UNTS P1kID.6YOR,3N BEHALFOF 13Of3FiOW ER: N.; REDUCTIONS IN AMOUNT d E TO s&LER: 201. Deposit or earnest money 5 )0 ,000-00 501. Excess deposit (see instructions) 500, 000.00 202. Principal amount of new loan(s) 1,9 , 500 .00 502: Settlement charges to seller (line 1400) 26,025.00 203. Existing loan(s) taken subject to 503. Existing loan(s) taken subject to 204. 50C Payoff of first mortgage Than 205. - 505. Payoff of second mortgage loan 206. - - - .:. - -- -r 506. 207. 507. 208. 508. 209. 509. ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS UNPAID BY SELLER: ADJUSTMENTS FOR ITEMS UNPAID BY SELLER: 210. City/town taxes to 510. City/town taxes to 211. County taxes to 511. County taxes to 212. Assessments to 512. Assessments to 213. 513. 214. 514. 215. 515. 216. 516. 217. 517. 218. 518. 219. 519. ?20. TOTAL PAID BY/FOR 5 20. TOTAL REDUCTIONS BORROWER: ? 2,45 7, 500.00 IN AMOUNT DUE TO SELLER: ? 526, 025.00 300. CASH. AT SETTLEMENT1=ROMITO Dort 110W.ER: OO; CASH AT SETTLEMENT TO/FROM SELLER- 101. Gross amount due from borrower (line 120) 2,727 , 195-25 6 01. Grossamount due to seller (line 420) 2, 600, 000.00 102. Lessamount paid by/for borrower (line 220) ( 2, 457 , 500-.00)6 02. Less total reductions in amount due seller (line 520 ( 526, 025.00) 103. CASH ( ® FROM) (C] TO) BORROWER: 0- 269 , 695.25 6 03. CASH (® TO) ( FROM) SELLER: ? 2, 073, 975.00 o(m No PTS-HUDI w (3-06) HUD-1 )M8 No 2502-0265 IS gESPA, HIS G3052 PAGEI 7 ?.. R? j 700. TOTAL SALES/BROKER'S COMMISSION I3A DON Pa1f:F $ plVl.&ION OF COtdry1 MON (Ut4E 700) 0LW,-VJS: 701. $ to 702. $ to 703. Commission paid at settlement 704. Commission 6.54'x,$2,000,000.00 to Remax Action Firsffless$'ln nnn om 801. Loan Origination fee % 802. Loan Discount % 803. Appraisal Fee to: 804. Credit Report to: 805. Lender's Inspection fee' - 806. Mortgage Insurance application fee to 807. Assumption fee 606. Loan Fee to SunTrust Bank NA 809. Flood Certification to SUnTruSt Bank NA 810. 811. ID FROM PAID FROM RROWER'S SELLER'S FUNDS FUNDS AT AT SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT 100,000.00 9,787.50 14.00 901. Interest from to ® $ Q /day 902. Mortgage insurance premium for mo. to 903. Hazard insurance premium for 12 mo, to 904. Flood Insurance Premium for 17 mo. to 3 905. _ _ t 1;?'' 1t it 1001. Hazard insurance months ® $ 1002. Mortgage insurance months @ $ 1003. City property taxes months @ $ 1004. County property taxes months ® $ 1005. Annual assessments. months 1006. months @ $ 1007. _ months @ $ 1008. months @ $ 1009. .. 1 11A1`lli lLC?tt'lR ttbCJ' 1101. Settlement or closing fee to Astro Title Services, Inc. 1102. Abstract or tille search to Stewart Title 1103. Title examination to Astro Title Services, Inc. 1104. Title Insurance binder to 1105. Document preparation to 1106. Notary tees to 1107. Attorney's fees to Holland & Knight, LLP (includes above items Numbers: 1108. Title insurance to Astro Title Services, Inc. (includes above items Numbers: Owners RP $9075.00 1109. Lender's coverage $ 1,957,500.00 1110. Owner's coverage $ 2,600,000.00 1111. Electronic Servicing Fee to Astro Title Services, Inc. 1112. FL Fm 9 Endorsement to Astro Title Services, Inc. 1113- Alta 8.1,6,Survey & Contiguity to Astro Title Svc. 0$25 'IOQ'tiOVE , 150.00 100.00 275.00 50.00 4,500.00 1 25.00 7,400.00 J 125.00 910.00 100.00 L QAI]iNG:>ANtt<TR 5 . . ;CH . I3GE8':5>:::i:;:> 1201. Recording fees: Deed's 18.50 ; Mortgage $ 180.00 I Releases$ 198.50 1202. City/county tax/stamps: Deed $ Mortgage $ 1203. State tax/stamps: Deed $ 18,200.00 ; Mortgage $ 6,851.25 6,551.25 18,200.00 1204. INTANGIBLE TAX to Clerk of the Circuit Court 3,915.00 1205. Record Memorandum of Contract to Astro Title Services, Inc. 35 .50 L3oo. AgdITiONALSETTL"MiikE "106> _ 1301. Survey to 1302. Pest inspection to 1303. Record Collateral Assignmet to Clerk of the Circuit Court 69.50 1304. Record Collateral Assignment to Clerk of the Circuit Court 61.00 1305. Record UCC-1 to Clerk of The Circuit Court 44.00 1306. Filing Fee UCC-1 to Transaction Registry 34.00 1307. Lenders Attorney CosLS to Holland & Knight 375.00 1400. TOTAL SETTLEMENT CHARGES (Enter on line 103 Section J - and - line ' eclon J 127,195.25 26,025.00 i-ve carefully reviewed the HUD-1 ?e amoral Statement end to the besl/f my knowledge and belief, It Is a true and accurate statement of all receipts and dlsbuemenls made on my ..... l or me in this transaction. 1 further Ily Thal I hove received a copy of UD-1 Settlement Slelement. The Salvation Army xrowers Triangle S.?CIand, LLC Sellers Registration no. L05000077223 e HUD-1 Settlement Statement which 1 have prepared Is a true and accurst . ..... ni of this transaction. I have caused or will cause the funds to be disbursed in accordance with this statement. attlement Agent ?y ?;?' ? Date August 31, 2005 Kathleen S. Pezone File No. 7681-PI-04 ARNING: It Is a crime to knowingly make false s(q ements to the United Stales on this or any other simper form. Penalties upon conicilon can Include a fine or imprisonment. For detells see: .a 18 U.S. Code Section 1001 and S-11- 1010, Form No.: PTS-HUD2 per month E per month per month per month per month per month S^ per month per month °6_ ORIG!NA1. WHITE PAPER Odnber 2004, updated April 2005 and September 2005 On New Automated Parking Garages Harrison Village and Island View Clearwater, Florida By Robotic ParkingTM Systems For Triangle Development, LLC Section A Robotic Parking System Synopsis Section B Summary of Robotic Parking Benefits Section C Frequently Asked Questions Section D The Hoboken, N7 Robotic Garage ORGNAL X51 C? L U U Lt ptAPdvi"IG & DE\iLlV?'a?i? ^d 1 SVC Robotic Parking"' Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 1 0"A" ? G I N A L ff-cel'o-TT S" Section A v ?+ y Robotic Parking System Synopsis PLANN1,G ? DEVFL(-'4-:,, %ifTIC Reliability As is true for anything man made in this universe, it is prone to fail. The only answer known to date to successfully overcome this is to apply the philosophy of the "one out of two failure". It doesn't mean just simply installing two motors on any single machine; it means the provision of two identical machines, which can take over from one another and accomplish the same task at anytime for any location. Robotic Parking Technology has proven to be extremely reliable in the operation of its Hoboken facility with over 130,000 parking transactions to date: the average retrieval time over these 130,000 transactions was 149 seconds, which also counts for instances when as many as ten patrons arrived simultaneously to retrieve their vehicles. On the storage side, this particular configuration is capable of receiving the next vehicle at the same Entry/Exit Station (EES) within 50 seconds after the previous patron has initiated the storage process. These numbers speak reliability and efficiency. After over two years of successful operation the questions of "does it work?" or "what happens if something breaks?" have been answered to the complete satisfaction of the patrons. AND: in these over 700 days of this 24/7 operation, there was not one single hour where no cars were stored or retrieved! A main criterion for reliability is detection and prevention; these are the diagnostics and the maintenance of the system. With a proper maintenance contract in place and a hot line with 24/7 coverage and a short response time, this technology is as reliable as it can be made. The system interface provides automatic reports about runtimes, necessary maintenance checks and many more features to keep the system reliability up. A note: During the New York City black out in August of 2003, the Robotic Parking Facility was the only operating garage in the city - the emergency generator provided the only lights and operation on the block. The garage operated at full capacity without interruption. The robotic parking garages proposed for Harrison Village and Island View combine standard mechanical technology with advanced automation technology, exactly as used in large automobile assembly lines like GM, Ford, and Mercedes. The uniqueness of the system lies in the modularity and flexibility of the system components, and in the seamless integration with the latest software platforms. A Brief History Initially the mechanical garage concept did not catch on in the US. primarily because there was plenty of land and parking space. In Europe, Asia and Japan however, where land is scarce, hundreds of mechanical garages were built from the mid- 50's. Almost all are still in operation. The largest of these garages, accommodating 849 cars, is an underground garage built by the former Krupp Manufacturing Company. The first automated garage was built by Krupp in 1958 in the Deutsche Bank in Munich. This system is still serving the patrons to date with its original installed parts. After over 45 years of continued operation. Another Krupp example is the underground garage at the Hotel Lotte in Seoul. This garage was built in 1984 by Krupp and has been operating since with over 1,200,000 parking operations per year, which translates to over 3,000 transactions per day. The garage proposed for this development is an advancement of the technology applied by Krupp in Germany. The Hoboken Garage is a stellar example of this. The first mechanical garage in the USA, built in Cincinnati in 1932, accommodated nearly 400 cars and used a converted elevator system to hoist individual vehicles from a central receiving area to one of its 24 floors. Once at the appropriate floor, dollies and/or a live attendant pushed the vehicle into its parking space. This garage operated every day until it closed in • 1979. Most of these early garages were demolished to make room for new buildings; two "classics" remain in service in New York City. • Prime Advantages of the Robotic Parking Systems Design This patented design separates all three movements (in and out, up and down, back and forth down the aisles)and has them • handled by individual intelligent components with true redundancy. No single failure will ever result in the garage becoming inoperable. Robotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ORWINAL • This technology allows for two to three times the amount of cars to be parked in the same space/volume of a conventional garage. Numerous secondary advantages such as enhanced safety, security and environmental benefits are outlined below. Parking Procedure The following steps happen when you park a car. • You drive your vehicle into an arrival station and park it; • After swiping a credit card, or using an EZ Pass, a central computer system directs a moveable carrier (pallet) to the arrival station; • The pallet and the vehicle are moved from the arrival station to a lift; • When the lift reaches the properly designated parking level, the pallet and the vehicle are transferred to the parking slot designated by the computer. Retrieval of the pallet and the vehicle is accomplished by simply reversing the procedure. At no time during the process does the vehicle leave the pallet to which it was initially assigned. P R, WTI Section B 1, C177) ^ Summary of Robotic Parking Benefits Less Waiting Time ` ' "• t . Y ?`' ; ' `T The system is designed to make multiple storage and retrieval activities at the same time. Typical dwell ti`mes'(IietweerY'• each parking cycle) are between 20 and 40 seconds. This results in a throughput capability of abut 40 to 50 vehicles per hour at each Entry/Exit Station (EES). The Harrison Village garage will have four EES's, and the Island View garage will have two. Both will be accessed off Osceola Avenue. No Backing Out This is a better service than conventional valet service due to the fact that no one ever drives or even touches the car from the time the driver leaves it until it is returned. While inside the facility all cars are turned 180 degrees so the patrons never have to back their cars out. No Stacking Back into the Street The design for the Harrison Village location especially takes into consideration the sensitivity to direct access onto the street. Four Entry/Exit Stations are provided into the garage at this location. Traffic Analysis reveals that these will be able to handle the heaviest traffic flow without causing any backup. In the extremely unlikely event of system failure or delay the traffic will be able to bypass the garage entry entirely and smoothly rejoin the traffic flow. • Reduced Traffic Congestion As an interesting note, the garage offers exactly what Department of Transportation (DOT) research has found, that over • 50% of the traffic in a typical downtown is simply on the road circling the block and searching for a parking space. As • the garage will be built in a downtown location where a conventional garage could not fit, this will drastically reduce traffic in downtown, resulting in less congestion, noise and nuisance, and also reducing the waste of precious space. • Reduction of Emissions • No cars running, no emissions. A car driving up a ramp in a conventional garage in search of a parking place has about the • same amount of toxic emissions as a car driving on the highway at 70 - 80 mph. Based on EPA data, it was found a 500 car garage of this type saves over 6,000 gallons of gasoline and eliminates toxic emissions of 1,000 pounds of hydrocarbons, • 3.5 tons of carbon monoxide, 500 pounds of nitrogen oxides and over 60 tons of carbon dioxide on a yearly basis. • Environmentally Clean • Reduces noise and air pollution; self-cleaning; separates oil and water for environmentally sensitive disposal. • Oil drips Pallets are the metal trays you drive onto when you park your car. They catch any oil, acid or salt water drips from cars. As • the car is transported around the garage on its pallet and never leaves it until you drive it out again, this guarantees that no • machinery ever touches any vehicle. And drips from cars or machinery or cars above it can never touch your car. • • • Robotic Parking'"' Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 3 • • • 0 R I d, *n? A L Traffic Flow Benefit Cars enter and exit from the main street into the facility and exit the same way. a. w tz?;{ PLAN.:: '.',3 & DEVEtOPMENTSVG Q iY 0!: m g a RVV2rPQ System Access - - " " The system offers several possibilities: Monthly users may find an "FEZ pass" (or "SunPass'l is most efficient, while visitors may simply swipe a credit card. The system can also retrieve owners' cars from the facility by remotely dialing into the system computer via a phone line. System Hotline Robotic Parking Systems installs a hotline at its headquarters and GE for remote 24 hours/7 days access with a swift response time. Training Robotic Parking Systems provides on-site training for owner's personnel. System Maintenance Robotic Parking Systems performs diagnostics and maintenance with trained personnel on site. The operation functions on a 24/7 basis. • System Redundancy The Robotic Parking System is triple redundant: 1. Every machine has redundant components inherent in it. In addition, there are at least two machines of each kind installed, and either can perform the same task. 2. The computer system is totally redundant itself. If one server fails, the second automatically takes over and as it has the same storage configuration data, no difference will be noticed. 3. An emergency power generator takes care of power outages. • System Monitoring The Robotic Parking system can also monitor, watch or operate the system remotely from any location. CIMPUCITY software allows for the creation of reports, at any given time. The extensive diagnostic capability also makes it possible to troubleshoot locally or remotely, and enables the performance of preventive diagnostics - all in real time. • Service Warranty A system warranty, maintenance contract and a hotline are in place to ensure continued operation of the system in . any eventuality. Trained technicians are available to operate the system and provide other auxiliary services as needed or wanted. • A Manned System According to National and International Standards, a public automated parking facility needs to be manned by a manufacturer-trained operator during opening hours. This service is performed by Robotic Parking Systems. This application can also utilize a valet service, where a valet will do the actual parking for the client. • Integrated Car Wash If desired, Robotic Parking Systems can easily integrate an automated brushless carwash into the system. • Loading/Unloading Bays Two separate bays will be provided where cars can be shuttled, away from the main vehicular flow. These bays will be • accessible via doors to the residential area. These bays can be used for any loading unloading activity, or any action that might take longer and would clog up the regular Entry/Exit Stations, such as cleaning or the like. • Storage Use Parking spaces not used for parking can be used as convenient storage spaces. For the amount of storage needed, pallets can • be converted into containers (7'x19'x7) and placed in the same parking slots as for cars. The loading and unloading of the containers is performed adjacent the terminal area, but in a location that will not disturb vehicular traffic. • Security To ensure no accidental or malicious access into the parking facility, we install heart beat detectors in the EES area. • Technology is also available to check the cars for explosives and narcotics before entering the facility. a Robotic Parking'-" Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 4 i S r i * I GINA L • Cost effectiveness. Lower maintenance and operating costs due to minimal lighting, ventilation, personnel and insurance requirements. Highest possible level of security for individuals. Majority of activity is within a contained area at ground level at the front of the garage. Greatly reduced chance of muggings or assaults; The Robotic Parking System can be viewed as the safest parking facility there is. With explosive and narcotic detection as well as heart beat detection components installed, this facility is second to none in the world - which is the reason why highest security projects are considering using Robotic Parking Systems. Better space utilization. Twice as many cars can be parked in the same space, or the same amount of cars can be parked in half the space as a conventional or surface parking, still leaving enough space for additional development on the site; changes the dynamics of land use. .;-.-. r-m r-, ra n nn F r-% Conventional Robotic Parking Technology [Frame8] 200'x 300' = 800 cars 200'x 100' = 724 cars -,3 w C j 300'x 100' = 822 cars Much less than half the space used PLANNING & DEVE D - l for nearly the same number of ..-? CITY()F Gl•E}-='".s '? cars Lower liability insurance. Fewer claims. No one enters the garage thus eliminating damage or theft of cars as well as personal injury. Better care and safety of the vehicles. No one enters the garage, no dents, scratches, vandalism or theft, thus eliminating costs incurred in having to repair damaged vehicles. Problems associatedwith regular parking garages and Robotic Parking solutions Risk of Accident and injury while drining to parking Ground Floor access only, which is safe and well lit Damage and dents No people inside the garage means 100% secure parking Theft and vandalism, weather related damage. Fully enclosed structure, with cars totally safe. Driving safety There are no tiresome and dangerous curving ramps to drive. Access to garage via EZ pass Simple, easy to use method of access; same as used at toll roads. Offered in addition to regular credit card access, or cash payment. Impact on Traffic & Congestion: According to Don H. Pickrell, Chief Economist at DOT , Volpe Institute, Cambridge, MIT (issued in the Spring edition of ULI's Smart Growth program, 1999): ".....recent research shows that over 50% of the traffic in typical downtowns is simply on the road, cruising around the block searching for vacant convenient parking spaces " Structural Design Parameters The basic layout of the system design requires a typical slab/mat foundation supporting a steel structure and the machines riding in it. The steel structure presents a kind of erector set with the needed amount of levels. No floors, no ceilings - it is an open rack structure. The bracing and columns are very effective for heavy wind loads as well. In case of this mixed use development, the structures for the building and the parking facility will be separated in order to avoid any sound or vibration influences into the surrounding building. Other than that, no special provisions need to be met for permitting purposes since the building is treated like a conventional storage building. No requirement for turning radii, slope for ramps and width of drive aisles as there are none. Robotic ParkingTM Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 5 N A i • Life Safety Issues A fire sprinkler system is provided inside the enclosed garage. Lighting is for maintenance purposes only and mechanical ventilation is not necessary since engines do not run inside the facility. Natural ventilation is provided by the installation of louvers in the roof. Maintenance Protocol Robotic Parking Systems but it utilizes sophisticated diagnostic tools to help maintain a high level of uptime. The system records every rotation of any wheel, bearing, gearbox and motor. Any needed maintenance is reported immediately to the 1-9 L:l online service department immediately. D Section C Frequently Asked Questions ::..., PLANNi.NG 8 DE, QUESTION Does the Automated Parking System provide true reliability? - «TV n? ANSWER As evidenced with the installation in Hoboken there was zero downtime in the operation over the last more than two years. True redundancy of the entire system ensures uptime of the operation any time: redundant machinery, redundant electronics including servers and generator in place. The System to be installed in the project is the same as installed and operating in Hoboken. As these projects are located in Clearwater, the headquarters of Robotic Parking Systems, a natural special attention is ensured by the company. Further, with the operators on site on a 24/7 basis as well as the on-line diagnostic system in place, the observation of the system is guaranteed to the degree that any early warning signals will be taken care of immediately; so it can be stated that the parking facility will be operational at all times. Please compare as well the article in the September 2004 issue of the National Parking Association. QUESTION How is peak traffic handled? ANSWER The traffic study results in a peak traffic of 58 cars in and 56 cars out for the peak hour for the garage. The system configuration as designed for the project has a capacity of 120 vehicles in a ONE directional flow. As the traffic study shows, the peak traffic is equally distributed for in and out traffic; therefore the capacity of the system for a bidirectional flow • is much higher than required. Real examples of the garage in Hoboken shows a peak traffic handling of 15 cars in a one directional traffic in 7 minutes. • QUESTION How are traffic patterns affected? ANSWER In/Out traffic from Osceola Avenue is guided by a 'right in' and a 'right out' only pattern. No cross traffic can occur, therefore ensuring a smooth traffic flow in and out of Osceola Avenue. In any unlikely case of traffic overflow the traffic will be redirected seamlessly back to Osceola Ave. • Consideration for pedestrians is not different than in any other garage entrance and exit lanes. Signage is extensive and can be made interactive. Overall traffic guidance is directed by traffic lights at strategic points of entry. • Separate spaces for loading and unloading of vehicles are created outside as well as inside the actual parking facility. These will not influence the traffic flow in and out of the garage. QUESTION How is the system used? ANSWER A user's manual will be freely available showing how the patrons in Hoboken became used to the automated parking facility. Please also compare the NPA article (attached) as to the patron dwell times. Robotic Parking'r' Systems - Triangle Development Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 6 0P IG I N A L Section D The Hoboken, NJ Robotic Garage PLANNING & DEVELC, •-, +t SVC5 CITY OF C The following is an article from The New York Times, about the first US. automated parking facility built three years ago in Hoboken, NJ. Space Age Garages That Save Space By ANTOINETTE MARTIN • The New York Times The Hoboken municipal parking garage that opened its robotically controlled • doors last year displays a stunning agility. It lifts and carries cars about on computer controlled steel pallets as if they were delicate ballerinas, moving with precision and speed inside a structure that is remarkably compact. While performance tests are still going on, the garage is limited to operating at two- thirds of its full capacity. When all systems are going, however, it will park 324 cars on just a 100-by- 100-foot lot. The seven-level garage is 56 feet high, not much higher than the four-story row houses that are its neighbors. "This is amazingly proficient use of space, " commented Darius Sollohub, a New Jersey Institute of Technology professor who studies parking and urban land use. It may provide one of the solutions to the most important conflict in urban design: where do you put all the cars in environments where car volume is high and space is at a premium': 'An automated garage typically takes only about half as much precious real estate as a conventional ramped garage to handle the same number of cars, or even more. That is why in European and Asian cities, the automatic garage was long ago anointed as the best solution. Mr. Sollohub said. The Hoboken structure, designed by Gerhard Haag, an engineer and architect born in Germany, where ramped garages are rare and automatic garages common, is a first-of-its-kind in the United States. The Hoboken garage belongs to a new generation of fully automated garages that parking industry specialists say is generating new interest. There are 67 American cities, including Manhattan, where his company is currently discussing proposals Hoboken 's Garden Street Garage is completely computerized, with two identical elevator systems that are able to move simultaneously in both vertical and horizontal directions and communicate with each other by wireless transmitters. The garage s computer figures out which of the hundreds of spaces in the building a vehicle should occupy, and then delivers it there untouched by human hands A monthly parker pulls into one of four driveways at the redbrick 'v \ building on Garden Street, which on the outside looks pretty much like a group of Hoboken row houses The driver powers the car forward a few yards onto a steel pallet, maneuvering the wheels between guardrails as instructions appear on an LED. signboard about correct alignment, then turns off the engine and gets out. Alter locking the car, the Parker swipes a card in front of a magnetic reader, and while the sign on the wall is flashing a reminder to step back, automatic elevator doors close around the car and it is whisked to a computer-assigned slot. Robotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 7 t 3iNAL The computer factors in the vehicle 's size when making an assignment, putting larger S? revels It also takes inio account the dr/vers schedule on previous visits, putting vehicles whose owners enter and exit frequently in the slots that the system can most easily access When the owner returns for the car and swipes the card again, the process begins in reverse. Within seconds, another electronic sign announces at which bay the car will appear, still on the pallet where the Parker placed it. In its first year of operation, according to the computer records, the average wait to retrieve a car was 2.5 minutes Press To view video clips, including a news report from CNN, please visit www.roboticparking.com. While the system was operating fully automated as early as May of 2002, the first patron drove his car into the garage in October 2002. As best summed up by the city official involved in this project from the beginning: "We ?-e pleased to say we have very happy patrons at the automated parking facility" -JoAnn Serrano, Executive Director of Hoboken Parking Utility 'The positive impact on the community has been significant. The customers have experienced great relief from the anxiety of having to find a parking spot. They enjoy the tremendous convenience of a parking facility nearby with all ground level access Additionally, they love the security aspect. They never have to worry about their car being stolen or vandalized. The neighbors /n the immediate area have been very pleased with the quietness of the system and the greatly reduced double parking on the street!" -Michael Cricco, Councilman And others... ".. the Hoboken garage displays a stunning agility - it lifts and carries cars about on computer-controlled steel pallets as if they were delicate ballerinas, moving with precision and speed inside a structure that is remarkably compact. " New York Times "....it 's amazing, a thing of the future. " Ann Serrano, Exec. Dir. Hoboken Parking Authority ".. When you return... no guesswork about where you parked it, no strange nicks, dents or scratches.. and no parking attendant to tip. ABC World News Tonight ...For drivers leaving or retrieving their cars at a parking garage, it's a dream; no exhaust fumes, no strange nicks or scratches appearing... " Wall Street Journal "..I want to express our extreme pleasure and thanks.. we were thoroughly impressed and satisfied that it was one of the few things we've seen that shows off the 20th Century technology. " Art Schwotzer - Chairman Crossgates Development one of the most intelligent inventions of the 20th century" AAA World Magazine Robotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 8 0 0 CIZARAM DESION ASSOCIATES, P.A. A1ZCiFEIrEC7s - PLANNERS ORIGINAL. O MEMORANDUM X TRANSMITTAL TO: FROM: DRC Submittal Jim Graham COMPANY: DATE: City of Clearwater 9/30/05 ADDRESS: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: Planning Department PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: RE: PROJECT NUMBER: Harrison Village/Island View 05-16 ? Via Regular Mail ? Via Overnight Express ? Via Facsimile ? Via Courier X Via Hand Delivery ? Via Pickup REMARKS: 1 Original plus 14 copies, SUBMITTAL: A. Applicant information brochure B. Signed/sealed survey. C. Site engineering drawings D. Architectural booklet. E. Architectural drawings. L? L9 UVy& SEP 3 0 2005 11 PLANNING & DEVE I i SVCSI CITY OF C:! 585 MAIN STREET SUITE 201 DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34698 PHONE: 727-733-9400 FAX: 727-733-9555 ITS' OF CLEARWATER 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ?i /?`?[? ???,POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ?o'18 0 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW January 11, 2006 Mr. Thomas Coates Triangle Development Company, LLC 305 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: FLD2005-09098 (410 North Fort Harrison Avenue - Harrison Village & Island View) Dear Mr. Coates! This letter is being provided to you as the designated agent for the above referenced project. At its meeting; of December 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the Flexible Development request; to permit a mixed-use development with 324 attached dwelling units (141 from Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 26,124 square feet of nonresidential floor area, an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 169 fleet (to roof deck) with an additional 28 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) for that portion of the development on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, an additional 21 feet (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for that portion of the development on the east side of North Osceola Avenue as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C, based upon Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and subject to conditions. Please be advised that prior to the issuance of a Development Order for this project, the following condition of approval must be addressed: ? That the applicant coordinates with the City's Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a Development Order to assure that adequate sanitary sewer service will be provided to the subject property and surrounding properties based upon the relocation of utilities associated with the new North Osceola Avenue right-of-way. Next Step: Submittal of Revised Plans One complete set of plans (collated, folded and stapled) must be revised to address the above condition of approval and submitted to the Planning Department for review. Once the revised plans have been reviewed for compliance with the above condition, the Development Order for this project can be issued. Please be advised that the Flexible Development approval is valid for one year; thus expiring on December 20, 2006. Prior to this expiration date, the first building permit must be applied for in order for this proposal to be, considered established, and no permits may be applied for until the Development Order has been issued. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. BRIAN t. AUNGSC, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARI), VICE MAYOR Hun- HA:M ILTON, COLINCIBIR>IBER BILL IONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PE FRSEN, COUNCILNIEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AC'1lON EMPLOYER" + January 11, 2006 FLD2005-09098 (410 N. Ft. Harrison Ate) Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: rober•t. tefft@,myclearwater. com GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIATES, P.A. ARCft IrE CTS - PLANNERS O MEMORANDUM X TRANSMITTAL TO: FROM: DRC Submittal Jim Graham COMPANY: DATE: City of Clearwater 11/23/05 ADDRESS: TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: Planning Department PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: RE: PROJECT NUMBER: Harrison Village/Island View 05-42 ? Via Regular Mail ? Via Overnight Express ? Via Facsimile ? Via Courier X Via Hand Delivery ? Via Pickup ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REMARKS: 1 Original plus 14 copies, SUBMITTAL: A. Revised Site Engineering Drawings. B. Revised east elevation of Island View with garage door size noted at 8'-4". C. Sheet A201, Harrison Village Trash Compaction Study. D. Copies of above at 8-1/2" x 11 ". OR16 K RECENED NOV 2 3 2005 pLANNING DEPARTMENT 585 MAIN STREET SUITE 201 DUNEDIN, FLORIDA 34698 PHONE: 727-733-9400 FAX: 727-733-9555 0 • Case Number: FLD2005-09098 -- 400 JONES ST 11:20 am ORIGINA Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Applicant's replies to Comments made at Development Review - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 29 The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments. Applicant's replies are indicated in italics: General Engineering 1-6, 8, 10. See Civil Engineer letter. 7. Separate right-of-way permits shall be obtained for all brick paver sidewalks along city streets. Agreed. 9. FDOT permits will be required for all work in Ft. Harrison Avenue (SR 595) right-of-way. Agreed. Environmental See Civil Engineer letter. Fire 1. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged. 2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Show location of fire pump. See Attached drawings 3. An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. Show location on plan. Emergency lighting should also be connected. See Attached drawings. 4. Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged. 5. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required. Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB . See Civil Engineer letter. 6. Cul-de-sacs are required to be 50' turning radius to centerline of 20' traffic lane. See Attached drawings for approved layout. 7. Robotic parking to meet requirements that were agreed to during meetings with developers' representatives and Chiefs Strong and Gray. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Acknowledged. See Attached letter and documentation. Land Resources qmh 1. Show all of the trees on all of the civil plans. It appears that some trees See Attached drawings. REMYED Nov 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFp 0 ORIGINAL 4 Parks and Recreation Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Acknowledged. Stormwater Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant is to provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit or letter of exemption to the project filed in Development Services. Acknowledged. Traffic Engineering 1. Revise civil site plan to show Fort Harrison Avenue to depict one southbound lane, one center lane and one northbound lane in addition to parallel parking along the west side of Fort Harrison Road, both lane and parallel parking widths must comply with City or F.D.O.T. standards. 2. The segment of Fort Harrison Avenue from Jones Street to Georgia Street must be aligned. 3. The segment of Osceola Avenue from Jones Street to Georgia Street must be aligned. 4. Install stop sign with stop bar on Georgia Street for eastbound lane at the intersection of Georgia Street and Fort Harrison Avenue. 5. Remove northbound stop sign and stop bar on Osceola Avenue . 6. Install stop sign and stop bar on Georgia Street for westbound lane at the intersection of Georgia Street and Osceola Avenue. 7.Parallel parking spaces along Fort Harrison Avenue and Osceola Avenue must comply with FDOT standards spacing requirements near intersections. 8.Striping for parallel parking must be 6" wide and in white thermoplastic. Questions 1 through 8, see Civil Engineer drawings 9.Will vehicles staging for robotic parking garage block sidewalks? If so, redesign to prevent situation. Staging will occur within the parking garage. An extra entrance was installed to increase throughput time and thus decrease the chance of stacking across the sidewalk. The sidewalk will be further delineated by continuing the paver construction across the vehicular access routes See Master Plan. 10.Sidewalk along Osceola Avenue must be a minimum of 5' wide per Community Development Code Section 3-1907 A. See Attached drawings. 11.Radius for parking garage must be suitable for vehicles to ingress and egress. Please demonstrate using a scaled passenger vehicle. See Attached drawings. 12.Parking garage must be able to accommodate a handicap van with a vertical height of 8'2". The robotic parking garage will accommodate suffident vehicles of this height. Planning According to the site plan (sheet 4 of 9), the development proposal consists of 28,776.75 square feet of non-residential floor area; however General Note #15 indicates 26,796 square feet and the submitted support documents state 27,168 square feet of non-residential floor area. Please clarify what is actually proposed. .The Net Leasable Square Footage is 26,124 sf. 1 . General Note #15 denotes 322 proposed dwelling units. This differs from what is of UNweo site da ta table (324). The correct number is 324. 2 . The site plan does not denote the F.A.R. (Floor Area Ratio) of the development. N' IV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMEK"r CITY OF CLEARWATF, M • Noted on Site Plan. ORIGNAL 3 . Submit a completed Public Amenities Incentive Pool application. See Attached. 4 . The submittal is unclear with regard to what is actually being requested from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. Please clarify. See Attached. 5 . With regard to the east/west elevation for Harrison Village, the central architectural element appears out of scale with the balance of the building. It is suggested that the height and/or width of the element be reduced so as to improve its relationship with the balance of the building. 6 . With regard to the east/west elevation for Harrison Village, the cornices appear much less decorative than those which were previously proposed and approved. Further, they seem disproportionate to the other features of the building. 7 . With regard to the east/west elevations of Harrison Village, the proposed storefront design seems repetitive and has little variation across the elevations. It is recommended that more variation is provided to the design (see previous elevations). 8 . With regard to the south elevation of Island View, specifically the southeast corner, the elevation appears empty and lacks detail. The elevation should be modified to be more consistent with the north elevation. Comments 5 through 8 have been addressed in the Submittal drawings, and the original look has been restored. 9 . There are what appear to be ventilation areas on the east elevation of Island View. Please clarify if these are, in fact, for ventilation of the parking garage and further what the intended materials are. These are ventilators necessary to the operation of the emergency generators. They are to be constructed of steel and finished to match the appearance of the building around them. 10 . With regard to Harrison Village, the trash chutes on the second and third levels do not line-up with the trash rooms on the ground level. Additionally, verify the adequate room will exist to maneuver the containers from the trash room past the proposed fountains and to the street. Lastly, provide a refuse staging area for the development (i.e. where does pick-up occur?). See attached drawings Trash chutes have been aligned and maneuvering room and staging areas. have been provided to meet the requirements of Solid Waste.- 11 . The submitted landscape plan can not be reviewed for compliance with much of the code, as no specifics have been provided as to the materials being proposed, their heights, spacing, and quantities. Please submit a revised landscape plan which includes this information. See attached drawings . 12 . Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, interior lot access is to be limited to the minimum number of curb cuts to adequately serve the site, and the location, number and design of driveways shall maintain the urban fabric of the Downtown. While the revised plans do not result in any additional curb cuts along Osceola Avenue from the previous approval, there are already substantial in number and the width of these curb cuts has been increased. It is recommended that the proposed curb cuts be no larger than those previously approved. In order to accommodate the increased capacity of the parking garage, and to maintain or decrease wait times, and thus avoid cars stacking onto the street, it was necessary to add an extra entrance to the garage. Care will be taken to delineate the sidewalks where they cross the access lanes. RECHVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning General Engineering % ORIGINAL 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzavac.com 1. On sheets 3 and 6 a note has been added to the plans which states, "With the vacation of the existing Osceola Avenue, all City Utilities shall be relocated and reconnected at the applicant's expense. 2. Please refer to sheet 6 of 9. Just southeast of SAN. MH# 1, SAN MH#6 is proposed along with a 10-inch gravity main that routes flows east to SAN MH# 4 (within relocated Osceola Avenue). Flow from SAN MH#4 then proceeds north to an existing manhole located at the intersection of Georgia Street and relocated Osceola Avenue. 3. Please see above reply to item 2 4. Please see above reply to item 2 5. Fire Department Connections have been relocated to be within 40' of a fire hydrant and also on the same side of the road. 6. All fire hydrants that are greater than 10' in length shall be constructed of Ductile Iron Pipe. Furthermore, each fire hydrant assembly shall at least 2 gate valves at the tee connection and at the fire hydrant location for Fire Hydrant Assemblies greater then 10' in length. 7. Arch 8. All sidewalks shall be constructed per the City of Clearwater's Contract Specifications, City of Clearwater Standard Index #109, and F.D.O. T. Index #304 9. Arch 10. Solid waste containers will be stored on the north and south end of Islandview as depicted on sheet 4 of 9. 11. On sheet 6 note number 19 states, "If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-septic water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department Rerquirements. Environmental 1. On sheet 5 of 9, section 'A A" has been modified to include the seasonal high water level. LFire Service 1. Arch NOV 0 8 2005 pLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CL, 2. Arch ORIGINAL 3. Arch 4. Arch 5. On Sheet 6 of 9 note number 12 states, 'Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. 6. Arch 7. Arch Harbor Master 1. No Comments Legal: 1 No Comments. Land Resources 1. The existing trees proposed to remain and to be removed have been shown on sheets 3 and 4. For plan clarity we have omitted this information from the other sheets. Landscaping 1. No Comments Parks & Recreation 1. n./a Stormwater 1. n/a L? L:1 Associates Inc. 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 ' , a Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 nqd%n (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax NOV 0 8 2005 keithQkeithzgyac.com PLANNING DEPARTMENT ORIGINAL EB 9351 LC26000212 CITY OF CLEARWATER General Engineering: 1. With the vacation of the existing Osceola Avenue, all City utilities shall be relocated and reconnected at the applicant's expense. Armed 2. The Belvedere Apartments currently connect to an 8-inch gravity line under existing Osceola. This line is proposed to be plugged. What provisions are planned for these apartments? The utility plan has been revised to show a gravity connection within a 10 foot wide utility easement from the existing Osceola manhole to the proposed system along the relocated Osceola right of way. 3. The City Sanitary Atlas indicates laterals to a line along Jones Street from the existing Osceola Avenue ROW to N. Ft. Harrison that flow to 8-inch sanitary line to be plugged. Are there additional users that will be affected? See response #2 4. 200 N. Osceola also connects to the 8-inch sanitary line to be plugged. What provisions are planned for this facility? See response #2 5. Fire Department Connections (FDC'S) shall be located within 40 feet of a Fire Hydrant Assembly and be on the same side of the road. FDCs are shown within 40 feet of proposed fire hydrants on the same side of the road. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Note has been added to site plan. 1 . Provide cross-section for pond or provide additional detail on Section A-A, Sheet 5 of plans and indicate seasonal high water level. The grading and drainage plan includes a section A -A showing the pond indicating seasonal high water level, Fire: This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm 0 ORIGINAL KrAMA VU) NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT kA@M?R using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefghfer p9onqL Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledge requirements 1 . An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100psi at roof is required. Show location of fire pump PRIOR TO CDB. See Architectural drawings for location. 2 . An emergency generator is required as a back up source of power for elevators and fire pump. Show location on plan. Emergency lighting should also be connected. PRIOR TO CDB See Architectural drawings for location. 3 . Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged. 4 . Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Required. Standpipe Systems shall be in place before construction can proceed to the next level. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Acknowledged. Note is located on site plan. 6 . Robotic parking to meet requirements that were agreed to during meetings with developers' representatives and Chiefs Strong and Gray. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB See Attached letter and documentation. Landscaping: Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Show all of the trees on all of the civil plans. It appears that some trees can be preserved. The existing trees to be removed and to remain have been added to the site plan and demolition plans Traffic Engineering: Revise civil site plan to show Fort Harrison Avenue to depict one southbound lane, one center lane and one northbound lane in addition to parallel parking along the west side of Fort Harrison Road, both lane and parallel parking widths must comply with City or F.D.O.T. standards. The Fort Harrison improvements have been revised to show two 10 foot wide thru lanes and an 11 foot dual tum lane per City standards 2. The segment of Fort Harrison Avenue from Jones Street to Georgia Street must be aligned. The roadway improvements have been revised to line up lames with existing lanes. KtAAAW r 0 ORIGINAL NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3. The segment of Osceola Avenue from ]ones Street to Georgia Streetq egWATER The roadway is aligned with the existing section to the north, Install stop sign with stop bar on Georgia Street for eastbound lane at the intersection of Georgia Street and Fort Harrison Avenue. Stop signs and bars have been revised, 5. Remove northbound stop sign and stop bar on Osceola Avenue . Removed. 6. Install stop sign and stop bar on Georgia Street for westbound lane at the intersection of Georgia Street and Osceola Avenue. Stop sign and bar added. 7.Parailel parking spaces along Fort Harrison Avenue and Osceola Avenue must comply with FDOT standards spacing requirements near intersections. Parallel parking is designed to City standards since FDOT will be transferring ownership to City, 8.Striping for parallel parking must be 6" wide and in white thermoplastic. Stripping has been revised. Mill vehicles staging for robotic parking garage block sidewalks? If so, redesign to prevent situation. Staging will occur within the parking garage. An extra entrance was installed to increase throughput time and thus decrease the chance of stacking across the sidewalk. The sidewalk will be further delineated by continuing the paver construction across the vehicular access routes See Master Plan. 10.Sidewalk along Osceola Avenue must be a minimum of 5' wide per Community Development Code Section 3-1907 A. The sidewalk is a minimum of 5 foot wide. l1.Radius for parking garage must be suitable for vehicles to ingress and egress. Please demonstrate using a scaled passenger vehicle. A scaled passenger vehicle has been added. 12.Parking garage must be able to accommodate a handicap van with a vertical height of 8121 . The robotic parking garage will accommodate sufficient vehicles of this height Planning: According to the site plan (sheet 4 of 9), the development proposal consists of 28,776.75 square feet of non-residential floor area; however General Note #15 indicates 26,796 square feet and the submitted support documents state 27,168 square feet of non- residential floor area. Please clarify what is actually proposed. The Net Ieaseable Square Footage is 261124 sf. 1 . General Note #15 denotes 322 proposed dwelling units. This differs from what is noted in the site data table (324). The correct number is 324. 2. The site plan does not denote the F.A.R. (Floor Area Ratio) of the development. Noted on Site Plan. 3 . Submit a completed Public Amenities Incentive Pool application. 2005 ORIGINAL NOVo 8 PLANNING DEPARTMENT See Attached. CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 . The submittal is unclear with regard to what is actually being requested from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. Please clarify. See Attached. S . With regard to the east/west elevation for Harrison Village, the central architectural element appears out of scale with the balance of the building. It is suggested that the height and/or width of the element be reduced so as to improve its relationship with the balance of the building. 6 . With regard to the east/west elevation for Harrison Village, the cornices appear much less decorative than those which were previously proposed and approved. Further, they seem disproportionate to the other features of the building. 7 . With regard to the east/west elevations of Harrison Village, the proposed storefront design seems repetitive and has little variation across the elevations. It is recommended that more variation Is provided to the design (see previous elevations). 8 . With regard to the south elevation of Island View, specifically the southeast corner, the elevation appears empty and lacks detail. The elevation should be modified to be more consistent with the north elevation. Comments 5 through 8 have been addressed in the Submittal drawings, and the orlginal look has been restored. 9 . There are what appear to be ventilation areas on the east elevation of Island View. Please clarify if these are, in fact, for ventilation of the parking garage and further what the intended materials are. These are ventilators necessary to the operation of the emergency generators They are to be constructed of steel and finished to match the appearance of the building around them. 10 . With regard to Harrison Village, the trash chutes on the second and third levels do not line-up with the trash rooms on the ground level. Additionally, verify the adequate room will exist to maneuver the containers from the trash room past the proposed fountains and to the street. Lastly, provide a refuse staging area for the development (i.e. where does pick-up occur?). These questions are addressed on the submittal drawings Trash chutes have been aligned and maneuvering room and staging areas have been provided to meet the requirements ofSolld Waste. 11 . The submitted landscape plan can not be reviewed for compliance with much of the code, as no specifics have been provided as to the materials being proposed, their heights, spacing, and quantities. Please submit a revised landscape plan which includes this information. See revised submittal landscape drawings 12 . Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, interior lot access is to be limited to the minimum number of curb cuts to adequately serve the site, and the location, number and design of driveways shall maintain the urban fabric of the Downtown. While the revised plans do not result in any additional curb cuts along Osceola Avenue from the previous approval, there are already substantial number and the width of these curb cuts has been increased. It is recommended that the proposed curb cuts be no larger than those previously approved. ¦ ir-i'?e??i? 1r?1 ORIGINAL In order to accommodate the increased capacity of the parking garage, and to maintain or decrease wait times, and thus avoid cars stacking onto the street, it was necessary to add an extra entrance to the garage. Care will be taken to delineate the sidewalks where they cross the access lanes RECEIVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RECENED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF CLEARWATER r:rrr.r.rr rrrrr meaiAnicAL rrrr; Enlsneevnrm rrr soLurions, rr: ORIGINAL in`'r November 7, 2005 Mr. Jim Graham, AIA and Mr GDA/BDG Joint Venture, LLC 585 Main St., Suite 201 Dunedin, FL 34698 Gregg Holdsworth, AIA RE: Island View Condominiums - DRC Comments of 11/03/05 Subject: Fire Protection Design Responses Related to DRC Comments ----------------- M-"-40 Listed below are responses to comments listed during the DRC hearing as they relate to fire protection and mechanical systems at Island View Condominiums. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. . MES response: Per fire protection and life safety requirements, this building is a high rise and as such shall be provided with the following mechanical and fire protection systems as required by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition: an electric fire pump fed emergency power by the emergency generator(s), automatic Class 1 standpipes with fire control valves, hose connections, flow switches and flow test stations on each occupied floor, a completely sprinkled building, pressurized stairwells with pressurization fans and controls fed from emergency power, elevator shaft venting via powered louver dampers fed from emergency power, rooftop manifolds for each of four Class I standpipes at the exit stairs, and all other systems as may be required to meet all applicable codes and life safety requirements.. 2. An automatic Class I standpipe system with a Fire Pump is required. 100 PSI at roof is required. Show location of fire pump PRIOR TO CDB. MES response: The facility shall have five Class I automatic standpipes as indicated on our 100% Design Development documents and the facility shall be fully sprinkled. There shall be one standpipe in each of the four exit stairwells and one in the automatic parking garage. With 500 GPM for the first standpipe and 250 GPM for each additional standpipe up to a maximum of 1250 GPM, per Chapter 14 of NFPA, the fire pump shall be sized to meet these requirements. The fire pump shall provide 100 psi of residual pressure at the most remote standpipes most remote hose connection (roof manifold), also per Chapter 14 of NFPA. The fire pump, per our 100% DD documents, shall be located on the ground floor of the North tower. 813.885.9600 • Fax 813.884.0045 5421 Beaumont Center Boulevard • Suite 675 • Tampa, Florida 33634 F C' -% A14 0 ORIGINAL 90 • Page 2 November 7, 2005 4. Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE-PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate water supply for this project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT. MES response: Per our 100% DD package, a flow test was conducted on the 8" main which shall service this facility with fire protection water and domestic water. The flow test yielded 71 psi static, 47 psi residual with 1130 gpm of flow. For the Class I systems at the listed flow rate in Item 2 above, this service is more than adequate for the required fire protection systems. The fire protection permit documents shall meet all requirements for permit documents as detailed in F. S. 61 G 15. I hope that the responses above have answered some of the questions that the CDB has concerning the aforementioned project as it relates to fire protection and mechanical systems. Please feel free to contact me at anytime with any additional questions that you may have. Sincerely, Mark E. Awmiller, P.E. Principal cc: File RECEIVED NnV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMEW CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 ARCHITECTS o PLANNERS TI-10MAS J. GRAf-IAM President AA 0000752 October 11, 2005 Joel Gray, Fire Division Chief City of Clearwater Fire Administration 610 Frarildin Street Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Harrison Village / Island View Condominiums Chief Gray: ORIGINAL This letter is a follow-up to our meeting of 9/22/05. It is our intent to follow through on this project in accordance with NFPA requirements, Florida Statutes, Florida Administration Code and Florida Fire Prevention Code as referenced in the attached letters from Michael C. Mitchell, Fire Life Safety Consultants Enterprise and Mark Awmiller, Mechanical Engineering Solutions, inc. We also agree that this building will be designed so that the separation in the garage is as follows: Where the electrical rooms and the generator rooms abut the garage, the interior shall be designed at a fire protection rating of 3-hours (both walls, floors and ceiling). The ceiling structure shall be designed to support the impact of the garage structure fully loaded with cars collapsing onto the roof structure of those particular rooms. The slab separating the garage from the living units above will also be provided with a 3-hour rated protection. All other walls abutting residential and/or other areas of the condominium will be designed to a 2-hour fire pro- tection rating. There will be a fire suppression room where the garage design will be such, that if a car is identified as on fire, the garage storage facility will be designed so that car will be delivered to the fire suppression rooms where the fire fighters may fight the fire. Located at those suppression rooms will be stand pipes. Final location will be determined by the Fire Marshal. Also, stand pipes will be provided at other locations as requested and approved by Fire Marshal. Please see attached letter :from Gerhard Haag (Robotic Parking). All of these items are to be accordance with orrr dis !I s Sincerer,.,/' r- Thorrra5 J. Graham GDA/ Joint Venture TJG/Jac Attaclmrent in the design and construction of this facility and will provide the mazinrurm protection in Cc: Ben Kugler (Triangle Development, Inc.) Jim Brandt (CM&D) Mike Mitchell (Fire Life Safety Consultants Enterprise) Mark Awmiiler (MES) Gerhard Haag (Robotic Parking) RECHVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 585 {!/lain Street, Suite 201 Dunedin, Florida 34698 (727) 733-9400 Fax (727) 733-9555 0 ORIGI AL MEMO October 14 / 2005 Island View - Triangle Development - Robotic Parking System - CW Bldq Department Finally got a hold of Plan Reviewer Jeff Walker at CW Bldg Dptmnt 562 4863 He and Mark Matheney (sp?) will go over the plans which we'll submit to them today and set-up a meeting for next week - not yet scheduled Preliminary & cursory statements from Jeff as to the RPS implementation into the building 1 informed him that we have an AS/RS not a building and do not support anything building related - he asked for copy of ASME B 30.13, which I faxed him this AM 2 After short discussion on the phone he stated that the Bldg department only wants to look into the interface of the EES's at grade level and the facade, openings and mechanical ventilation as well as electrical and plumbing. He said only looking into issues that are building related. Informed him that these items are all included in architects plans for actual building. 3 Informed him that we are already talking to Fire Dptmnt which he seemed glad about 4 He said that they definitely will NOT look into anything mechanical of the system, anything to do with machinery and its supporting structure. 5 He asked about environmental issues; told him that under this aspect the system will be viewed as any other regular garage and that we have inserted mudcollector and oil separator included which made him happy. Will advise of further developments Gerhard Haag RECEVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ? ORIGINAL 0 1'i rP- 1 Life a& , anus tin _- 40 Bourne is"ircle, Palm Harbor, ILL 34683, m.cm&Ia Lc a,;ttm?al?ay_.111 c_om; ofi.'ice:727-785-9556; M027-744-9504 To: GDA-BDG Joint Venture From: Michael C. Mitchell, Fire and Life Safety Consulting Enterprise Subject: Harrison Village/Island View condominium project Topic: Automatic Fire Sprinkler System Date: September 19, 2005 The purpose of this document is to establish the appropriate Fire and Life Safety Code requirements pertaining to the enclosed parking structure portion of the Harrison Village/Island View condominium project. In brief, Island View is a high rise consisting of twin fifteen story residential towers united by a six story enclosed parking structure and again two residential floors above that. A completely automated or robotic parking system will be installed, structurally independent from and within the parking structure. No floors subdivide the parking garage; it is an open space throughout the six-story height (except for structural columns, Etc.) Further, it is separated from the remainder of the high-rise building with 2-hour fire resistive construction (both residential and common use areas). APPLICABLE REVIEWED CODES (DIRECT, ANNEX, EXPLANATORY) 1. NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) 1, Uniform Fire Code, 2003 Edition, 2. NFPA 101, Life Safely Code, 2003 Edition; 3. NFPA 88A, Standard for Parking Structures, 2002 Edition 4. NFPA 230, Standard for the Fire Protection of Storage, 2003 Edition; 5. NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2003 Edition; 6. NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2000 Edition 7. NFPA 130, Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems, 2003 Edition; 8. NFPA 16, Standard for the Installation of Foam-Water Sprinkler and Foam-Water Spray Systems, 2003 Edition; 9. NFPA 750, Standard for Water Mist Fire Protection Systems, 2003 Edition; 10. Florida Statutes, Chapter 633, 2003; 11. Florida Administrative Code, Rules of the Division of State Fire Marshall, Rule Title 69A; 12. Florida Fire Prevention Code, Chapter 69A-60 r z, ;s °i. ry a? S? r ge.. Solid-piled, palletized, rack storage, bin box, and shelf storage in excess o 12 ft (3.7 m) in height. [13: 3.3.121 RECEYED NUV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF n rAmumn ORIGINAL RECHVED NOV 08 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Stractv,,re. A building, structure, or portion thereof used f9'TKe0Pq W e, or both, of motor vehicles. • Enclosed Parking Structure [13: 3.3.2.1*] - Any parking structure that is not an open parking structure. • Open Parking Structure [13:3.3.2.2] - A parking structure that, at each level, has wall openings open to the atmosphere, for an area not less than 0.4m2 for each linear meter (1.4 ft2 for each linear foot) of its exterior perimeter. Such openings are distributed over 40% of the building perimeter or uniformly over two opposing sides. Interior wall lines ar column lines are at least 20% open, with openings distributed to provide ventilation. • Parking Structure [13: A.3.3.2] - A parking structure is permitted to be enclosed or open, use ramps, and use mechanical control push-button-type elevators to transfer vehicles from one floor to another. Motor vehicles are permitted to be parked by the driver or an attendant or are permitted to be parked mechanically by automatic facilities. Where automatic parking is provided, the operator of those facilities is permitted either to remain at the entry level or to travel to another level. Motor fuel is permitted to be dispensed, an( motor vehicles are permitted to be serviced in a parking structure in accordance with NFPi 30A, Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages R?1l?, Any combination of vertical, horizontal, and diagonal members that supports stored materials. Some rack structures use solid shelves. Racks can be fixed, portable, or movable. Loading can be either manual - using lift trucks, stacker cranes, or hand placement - or automatic - using machine-controlled storage and retrieval systems. [13: 3.10.8] 53ep :ri' to cctr: ascy, A multiple occupancy where fire-resistive assemblies separate the occupancies. [101: 6.1.14.2.3] etc^ i,, ,7? e Occ:.rupAricy? An occupancy used primarily for the storage or sheltering of goods, merchandise, products, vehicles, or animals. [101: 6.1.13.1; A6.1.13.1] Storage occupancies shall include all buildings or structures used primarily for the storage or sheltering of goods, merchandise, products, vehicle, or animals. [101:42.1.1.2] ystern.; A sprinkler system employing automatic sprinklers attached to a piping system containing water and connected to a water supply so that water discharges immediately from sprinklers opened by heat from a fire. [13: 3.4.9] REQUIREMENT ASSESSMENT 1. Separation/Occupancy. The project building is a separated occupancy; the two predominate occupancies are storage and new apartment. These two occupancies shall be segregated from each other with two-hour fire resistive construction. When ? ORIGINAL ? an automatic sprinkler system is installed throughout the building, the two-hour separation may be reduced to one-hour. [101: 6.1.14.42, 6.1.14.43, and Table 6.1.14.4.1] 2, Fire Extinguishment., The structure housing the robotic parking/storage system is required to be protected throughout by a supervised automatic sprinkler system of the wet pipe variety and a Class I standpipe system (both in accordance with Section 101: 9.7). Requirement linkages between specific code citations are multidirectional and provide redundancy. NFPA 1 and NFPA 101 refer back and forth to each other, from chapter to chapter within each, as well as to additional codes such as NFPA 13, 230, and 88A. There are several different code tracks and they are as follows: RECEVED Nov 0 8 2005 P1MNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER NFPA 1, Chapter 13 requires that all new buildings, specifically high-rise [13.3.2.22.1] and new storage occupancies [13.3.2.23.1, 2, and 3], more than three stories above grade shall be equipped with a Class I standpipe system in accord with NFPA 14 [13.2.2.1, 13.2.2.2] and automatic sprinklers in accord with NFPA 13 [13.3.1.1]. Chapter 20, Occupancy Fire Safety, states storage occupancies, where required to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system in another section of this code, shall comply with NFPA 230 [20.15.2.1]; high-piled storage shall comply with NFPA 13 and 230 [20.15.7.1]; and, high-rise buildings shall comply with NFPA 101 [20.16.1.1]. Chapter 29, Parking Garages, the protection of new enclosed parking structures shall comply with NFPA 101: 42.8 and NFPA 88A. NFPA 101, Chapter 11, Special Structures and High-Rise Buildings, requires high-rises to be protected throughout with an supervised automatic sprinkler system and Class I standpipe system in accord with 101:9.7 [11.8.2.1, 11.8.2.2]. But, only when required by chapters 12 through 42. Further, 9.7 dictates that these systems shall be provided in accord with NFPA 13 and 14. Chapter 42, Storage Occupancies (also referred from NFPA 1, to 42.8), ties together enclosed parking structures to storage occupancies. Section 42.8.1.1 Application states "The provisions of 42.8.1 through 42.8.5.4 shall apply to parking structures of the closed or open type, above or below ground, but shall not apply to mechanical or exclusively attendant-type parking facilities that are not occupied by customers." Therefore, because this is an automated, customer free space, the provisions under the broader heading of storage are applicable and that storage occupancies in high-rises shall meet the automatic sprinkler requirements of 11.8.2.1 [42.4, and 42.4.1]. NFPA 13, 88A, and 230 are referenced repeatedly in the code literature used above. All three provide design criteria in depth as well as fundamental requirements. NFPA 230 requires that sprinkler systems used in storage buildings shall be accordance with NFPA 13. Mr. Larry Stewart, Technical Staff for NFPA 230, verifies that NFPA 230 is an extract of NFPA 13, with requirements that do not conflict with 13. Further he advised that NFPA 230 would not be renewed as an active code at the next cycle of revisions. NFPA 0 ORIGINAL '* 13, specifically, Chapter 12 provides a lengthy and detailed description of requirements for storage occupancy. The starting point is this, "Sprinkler systems shall be wet pipe systems" [13:12.1.4.1, 12.1.4.2, A12.1.4, A12.1.4.2]. Chapter 5 provides classification definitions in order to establish the next level of design criteria, occupancy hazard and commodity classification. Mr. John Mongo, Technical Staff of NFPA 13, advises that the hazard class for the enclosed parking structure, as described in the opening paragraph, is Ordinary Hazard (Group 2) [13:5.3.2] and the commodity class is Class IV [13:5.6.3.4]. This is a rack storage system [13:3.10.8] and specific design criteria to meet building design are found in 13:12.3.4, Protection Criteria for Rack Storage of Class I through Class IV Commodities Stored Over 25 ft in Height. NFPA 88A provides: the definition for parking structures [3.3.2, 3.3.2.1, 3.3.2.2]; 2 hour fire separation between occupancies [4.1.2]; ventilation requirements for 1 cubic foot per square foot of floor area [5.3.2]; Class I standpipe requirement [6.4.1]; and, either a automatic sprinkler system or a supervised automatic fire detection system installed with a mechanical ventilation system [6.2]. NFPA 30 is referenced several times, however, it exclusively does not apply to motor vehicle fuel tanks. CONCLUSION COMMENTARY At issue is the scope and design of fire extinguishment (fire sprinkler system) provisions required in the Fire and Life Safety codes regarding the parameters defined in the opening paragraph. NFPA 1, 101, 13, 130, and 88A, as a group, clearly define the requirement for a supervised automatic sprinkler system, wet pipe design. Our concerns about the unique commodity fuel load, motor vehicle/automobile storage, are legitimate. Despite that uniqueness, it is within the design criteria of a NFPA 13 Rack Storage System. Respectfully submitted, Michael C. Mitchell, Consultant RECHYED FLSCE NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 • r r r Y r r O R I GINAL r r r r r r rrrrr MECHAnICAL r r r° r EnGInEERinG r r r S®LUTI®n5, r r Inc r RECOVED October 11, 2005 Mr. Jim Graham, AIA Graham Design Associates, P.A. 585 Main St., Suite 201 Dunedin, FL 34698 NOV 0 8 2005 ?L&NMNG DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RE: Island View Robotic Parking Garage - City of Clearwater Fire Marshal Meeting Subject: Report on Codes and Regulations FIRE PROTECTION CODE OBSERVATIONS Occupancy 1. Reviewing the proposed design for an enclosed automated parking garage, this building should be categorized in group S-2, enclosed parking garage which is regulated by sections 311, 406, and 503 of the 2004 FBC. 2. This building would not be required to comply with the requirements of section 405 because it is not designed for human occupancy. Construction Type 1. Construction type of the building would be 1A, fully protected noncombustible construction. 2. Type 1A construction will allow up to 12 internal stories with sprinkler system. Type 2A will allow up to 6 stories and Type 26 construction would allow up to 5 stories. Fire Protection 1. Area would need to be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with FBC 903. 2. An automatic Class I standpipe system would be required in accordance with FBC 905. 3. Portable fire extinguishers would be required in accordance with section 906 of the FBC. NFPA-88A, 2002 Ed. 1. NFPA-88A, 2002 Edition is the applicable standard for fire protection to be applied. NFPA-88A States the following as a description of a parking garage covered under this fire protection standard (from Annex A, pg. 88A-7, bolded and underlined emphasis is mine): "A.3.3.2 Parking Structure. A parking structure is _permitted to be enclosed or open, use ramps, and use mechanical control push-button-type elevators to transfer vehicles 813.885.9600 • Fax 813.884.0045 5421 Beaumont Center Boulevard - Suite 675 • Tampa, Florida 33634 1 0 - ORIGINAL • Page 2 October 11, 2005 from one floor to another. Motor vehicles are permitted to be parked by the driver or an attendant or are permitted to be parked mechanically by automatic facilities. Where automatic parking is provided the operator of those facilities is permitted either to remain at the entry level or to travel to another level. Motor fuel is permitted to be dispensed, and motor vehicles are permitted to be serviced in a parking structure in accordance with NFPA 30A, Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages. 2. The description above describes the current parking structure design and it should be acceptable if fire protection is provided per NFPA-13. 3. Per 88A-6.2, the following also applies: "6.2 Automatic Sprinkler Systems or Fire Detection and Smoke Removal. Enclosed parking structures located at or above grade, within or immediately below a building used for another occupancy, shall have one of the following systems: (1) An approved, automatic sprinkler system fully protecting the parking area (2) An approved, supervised, automatic fire detection system installed throughout the parking area and a mechanical ventilation system in accordance with 5.3.2." Per 88A-5.3.2 "All enclosed parking structures shall be ventilated by a mechanical system capable of providing a minimum of 300L/min per m2 of floor area (1 ft3/min per ft2 of floor area) during hours of normal operation." Since the FMC requires 1.5 ft3/min per ft2 of floor area, this more stringent requirement would apply. To allow smoke removal, the fan would have to be UL listed for this capability. With automatic sprinklers and fire detection with smoke removal capabilities, this parking garage would have redundant fire protection not specifically required by the code. Per 88A-6.4 Standpipes: In other than open parking structures as described in 6.4.2, structures exceeding a height of 50 feet or having parking levels below grade shall be provided with a Class I standpipe system in accordance with NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe, Private Hydrant, and Hose Systems." As detailed above under the FBC, Section 905, a Class I standpipe is also required. 4. With respect to building construction, NFPA-88A states the following: "4.1.1* Parking structures shall be built using one of the types of construction defined in NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, except as amended by this standard." Per the * under explanatory material: "A.4.1.1 Building codes generally contain provisions limiting the heights and areas of parking structures of various types of construction." Therefore, the FBC construction requirements and limitations above would apply DECHVED NOV 0 8 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 ORIGINAL • Page 3 NFPA-13, 2002 Ed. 0 October 11, 2005 1. Per NFPA-13, A.5.3.1, the required occupancy classification for a parking garage is Ordinary Hazard Group 1 with maximum sprinkler spacing of 130 sq.ft. Mechanical 1. Chapter 3 of the FMC contains the requirements for enclosed parking garages and would apply- 2. Due to the very remote possibility of someone traveling with their car into the garage, an exhaust system shall be provided that will operate based upon the 1.5 cfm/sq.ft. requirements of Chapter 4 of the 2004 FMC. 3. Smoke evacuation via the required ventilation exhaust fan shall be utilized as specifically allowed and required per NFPA-88A. This is as an additional safety since the garage shall be fully protected with an automatic sprinkler system and other safeguards. D a LM ALTERNATIVE RACK STORAGE FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS: If NFPA-88A is discounted as the most applicable NFPA code section related to the Robotic Parking Garage at this facility, then the next closest approximation providing requirements for fire protection can be found in NFPA-13, Chapter 12, Storage. Per NFPA-13, states or has the following key elements (bold and underline are mine for emphasis): "12.1 General. The requirements of Section 12.1 shall apply to all storage arrangements and commodities unless modified by specific section in Chapter 12." "12.1.4* Wet Pipe Systems. 12.1.4.1 Sprinkler systems shall be wet pipe systems." "A.12.1.4 Wet systems are recommended for storage occupancies. Dry pipe systems should be permitted only where it is impractical to provide heat." "12.3.1 Protection Criteria - General. 12.3.1.1 This section shall apply to storage of materials representing the broad range of combustibles stored in racks." W 09 "12.3.1.2.1 Sprinkler protection criteria for the storage of materials on racks shall be in X I accordance with 12.3.2 or 12.3.3 for storage up to 25 ft (7.6 m), and 12.3.4 and 12.3.5 o iX .,,? for storage over 25 ft (7.6 m1." C'V Q J=_ 00 ?++ "12.3.1.9.2 Where solid shelving in single-, double-, and multiple-row racks exceeds 64 o V ft2 in area or where the levels of storage exceed 6 ft (2 m), sprinklers shall be installed at Q Z O the ceiling and below each level of shelving." z 20 It is worth noting that in the Explanatory Material of NFPA-13, FIGURE A.3.10.8(e) V Automatic Storage-Type Rack, shows a figure of an automatic rack storage system very p. similar to the automatic storage system in use by Robotic Parking. "A.3.11.4 Miscellaneous Tire Storage. The limitations on the type and size of storage are intended to identify those situations where tire storage is present in limited quantities and incidental to the main use of the building. Occupancies such as aircraft hangars, automobile dealers, repair garages, retail storage facilities, automotive and truck ORIGINAL • • Page 4 October 11, 2005 assembly plants, and mobile home assembly plants are types of facilities where miscellaneous storage could be present." "12.3.5.3.1.1 ESFR protection as defined shall not apply to the following: (1) Rack storage involving solid shelves" MES note: The steel vehicle skids can be assumed to represent solid shelves in the rack storage system. 12.3.4.4.3 In-Rack Sprinkler Water Demand for Rack Storage of Class I through Class IV Commodities Stored Over 25 ft (7.6 m) in Height. The water demand for sprinklers installed in racks shall be based on simultaneous operation of the most hydraulically remote sprinklers as follows: W (4) Fourteen sprinklers (seven on each two top levels) where more than one _ LN level is installed in racks with Class IV commodities" ° Q LLJ MES note: This assumes that an automobile is a Class IV commodity, as d d b F op O 0 J recommen e y N PA, Chapter 13, staff liaison to Mike Mitchell. ?U " 0 j„ g 12.3.4.4.4 In-Rack Sprinkler Discharge for Rack Storage of Class I through Class o z Q IV Commodities Stored Over 25 ft (7.6 m) in Height. Sprinklers in racks shall FLU Z jo- discharge at a rate not less than 30 gpm (113.6 L/min) for all classes of commodities." SO MES note: With 14 sprinkler heads, the required drainage and oil interceptor would be required to sized at 420 gpm. SUMMARY OF CODE REQUIREMENTS AND PROPOSED INSTALLATION 1. Per NFPA-88A; a wet sprinkler system is required with a Class I standpipe system. The fire protecti on systems for this structure shall be designed and specified to meet the requirements of NFPA-88A and NFPA-13 for a parking garage. Items that the project will employ in addition to the required elements listed in the appropriate code sections above are: • Extra fire protection (3 hr floor) between the garage and the living units above • Sprinkler density and spacing that will meet Extra Hazard Group 1 or Group 2 with multiple heads at every level and square footage per head of less than 100 sq.ft. and maximum spacing of 12'. • An automatic sprinkler system AND fire detection and smoke removal, where only one or the other is required according to NFPA-88A. Smoke removal by a UL listed fan used primarily for ventilation purposes as specifically allowed in NFPA-88A. • An automatic retrieval of any car whose fire detection sensors (to be provided by Robotic Parking) indicate a fire condition with retrieval placement into a fire safe enclosure with deluge heads and a hose valve for fire fighting purposes, as requested by the local AHJ. 2. As an alternate, fire protection Per NFPA-13, Chapter 12, Storage; A wet sprinkler system is also required with a Class I standpipe system. The fire protection systems for this structure would be designed and specified to meet the requirements of NFPA-88A and NFPA-13 for storage over 25 feet with solid shelves and a Class IV commodity. e ORIGINAL • • Page 5 October 11, 2005 Items that the project will employ in addition to the required elements listed in the appropriate code sections above are: • Extra fire protection (3 hr floor) between the garage and the living units above • Sprinkler density and spacing that will meet rack storage requirements with heads at every rack level and staggered, heads in vertical flue spaces, ceiling sprinklers with intermediate heads and a density of 0.45gpm/sq.ft. • An automatic sprinkler system AND fire detection and smoke removal, in accordance with NFPA-88A. Smoke removal by a UL listed fan used primarily for ventilation purposes as specifically allowed in NFPA-88A. • An automatic retrieval of any car whose fire detection sensors (to be provided by Robotic Parking) indicate a fire condition with retrieval placement into a fire safe enclosure with deluge heads and a hose valve for fire fighting purposes, as requested by the local AHJ. Applying the fire protection methods in either 1. or 2. above, will meet current fire protection requirements for this facility as specifically provided for in NFPA. QUESTIONS: What about a deluge system? Per NFPA-13, deluge systems are a dry system and are not permitted except where protection against freezing temperatures cannot be provided. Additionally, a deluge system for the entire parking structure would require in excess of 19,000 gpm of flow, which cannot be provided by Clearwater Utilities in the area. Even a multizoned deluge system would require the fire zone and two adjacent zones, which could collapse domestic water service in the area and compromise fire fighting capabilities at other structures. Does this parking structure represent an Extra (high) Hazard condition and therefore should meet the Performance Based Requirements of NFPA-1, Chapter 5? Per NFPA-1, "3.3.32.3 Ordinary (Moderate) Hazard. An occupancy in which the total amount of Class A combustibles and Class B flammables are present in greater amounts than 939 W expected under light (low) hazard occupancies. These occupancies could consist of dining [I---i { < rL" areas, mercantile shops, and allied storage; light manufacturing, research operations, auto showrooms parking garages (em hasis is mine) work h t i f li h o LY , p , s op or suppor serv ce areas o g t (low) hazard occupancies; and warehouses containing Class I or Class II commodities as fin d d b NFPA 13 d f St d th I t ll ti f S 3 m e e y , an ar or ns e a a on o prinkler Systems [10:1.4]. LLJ ? ao ] n? [ 1? (D (,) Clearly, NFPA-1, NFPA-13, NFPA-88A, and NFPA-101 deem parking garages (automated or 0 o LA- 0 manual and open or closed) to be ordinary (moderate) hazard occupancies. With automated facilities the fact that the are unoccu ied sho ld t l h d t l k Z Z , y p u presen a ower azar o peop e par ing their automobiles than a arkin facilit that allows drivin d b Additi ll p g y g an access y anyone. ona y, r V it is worth noting that NFPA-1 lists the occupancy classification for a structure where motor fuel ?- is dispensed indoors as a Low Hazard Industrial Occupancy per NFPA-1, 30.1.2. Doesn 't the fact that evaluating an automobile as a Class IV commodity under Storage in NFPA-13, mean that High (Extraordinary) Hazard would apply? Overall, the purpose of storage facilities is to stockpile the maximum amount of material into the smallest possible space possible while maintaining effective access for material handling. These are usually piled high and represent materials in-process. From a fire perspective, this 0 ORIGINAL '* • Page 6 October 11, 2005 translates into squeezing the maximum amount of combustibles into the smallest possible space while maintaining plenty of air access for efficient combustion. Because an automated garage can triple the density of a standard parking garage does this equate to "squeezing the maximum amount of combustibles into the smallest possible space"? Generally, the side-to- side spacing in an automated garage is only slightly tighter than a standard garage. The real space savings comes in the up and down transition areas such as ramps and in/out driveways. Where the cars are physically parked near one another isn't drastically different between the two. NFPA-13, Storage was used as an alternate to NFPA-88A, which is clearly the code for parking garages and by evaluating Storage based upon the highest commodity class, which constitutes a part of an automobile, we are attempting to evaluate a worst-case-scenario. When dispensing motor fuels indoors within a parking garage would not constitute a high hazard situation, why would a slightly higher density of automobiles constitute a high hazard situation, especially when it meets the acceptable definition of a parking garage in NFPA-88A? FINAL SUMMATION: Per the discussions and references above, applying NFPA-88A and then providing in rack sprinkler coverage meeting the requirements NFPA-13, Storage is applicable in determining the proper level of fire protection for this automated parking facility. The additional items being provided for in the design (i.e. fire detection and an automated retrieval and extinguishing system, as requested by the AHJ) provide additional levels of protection not specifically required by the codes. Additionally, the facility is manned 24/7 providing continuous human monitoring of the garage that is normally not available or provided for at standard parking garages. Sincerely, Mark E. Awmiller, P.E. Principal cc: Chief Gray, Clearwater Fire Dept. Asst. Chief Strong, Clearwater Fire Dept. Gregg Holdsworth, BDG Mark Perkins, Triangle Development Jim Brandt, CM&D RIECemED NOV 08 2005 141 (GDEPARtME T PGlV OF cLFAV T LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 3, 2005 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Mr. Thomas Coates Triangle Development Company, LLC 305 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: FLD2005-09098 - Harrison Village & Island View Condominiums - Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Coates: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-09098. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, November 3, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. Please contact Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at (727) 5624582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(a)myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYC HAMILTON, COUNCII MEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COLSNCII.DIEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE Ac*nON EMPLOYER CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 c: Clearwater FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: October 3, 2005 To: Thomas Coates, (727) 446-0002 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLD2005-09098 / Harrison Village & Island View Condominiums Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: **Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.te li cL?mycleanvater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** 0 0 Oct. 03 2005 04:43PM YOUR LOGO CityO#Clearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94460002 Oct.03 04:42PM 01'01 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: December 20, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-09098 Agenda Item: E. 4. Owner: Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC. Applicant: Triangle Development Company, LLC. Agent: Thomas Coates Addresses: 302, 303, 304, 308 and 309 North Osceola Avenue; 410 Jones Street; and 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development with 324 attached dwelling units (141 from Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 26,124 square feet of nonresidential floor area, an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 169 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 28 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) for that portion of the development on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, and an additional 21 feet (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for that portion of the development on the east side of North Osceola Avenue as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. EXISTING ZONING / Downtown (D) District. LAND USE: Central Business District (CBD) Category. CLEARWATER Old Bay DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant. Proposed Use: Mixed-use (324 attached dwelling units and 26,124 square feet of nonresidential floor area). ADJACENT ZONING / North: Downtown (D) District - Attached Dwellings and Vehicle LAND USE: Sales/Display. South: Downtown (D) District - Attached Dwellings and Overnight Accommodations. East: Downtown (D) District - Offices, Problematic Use, and Vehicle Sales/Display. West: Downtown (D) District - Attached Dwellings and Clearwater Harbor. Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 1 9 • UPDATE: At its meeting of July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a Flexible Development application to permit a total of 324 attached dwelling units (including 119 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 18,893 square feet of nonresidential floor area with a reduction to the required nonresidential parking requirement as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proj ect. Prior to approving the development proposal, the Board expressed some concerns regarding the amount of on-site parking provided by the development. As such, the applicant has made modifications to the development proposal resulting in the provision of an additional 130 parking spaces, which has eliminated the need for a parking reduction. The additional parking spaces resulted in the need to provide an additional access point (i.e. platform) to the garage to maintain acceptable timeframes for "processing" vehicles within the robotic parking garage. The development proposal also consists of two further changes. Firstly, the provision of an additional 7,231 square feet of nonresidential floor area, which was accomplished by relocating the seven ground level dwelling units within the Harrison Village development component into the Island View component. Secondly, a 0.11-acre parcel located at the southern end of the development was deemed superfluous to the development proposal and was sold off to an adjacent property owner for future development. The trash compactors and generators for the Island View component, which previously were located on this parcel, have been relocated within the base of the Island View structure. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 5.06-acre subject property is generally located on the west side of North Fort Harrison Avenue and bounded by Jones Street to the south, Georgia Street to the north and Clearwater Harbor to the west. The subject property is currently bifurcated by North Osceola Avenue, thereby splitting the property into east and west halves: Harrison Village (east) and Island View (west). It is noted that a 0.1995-acre portion of the site is located within the Preservation (P) Future Land Use category and does not yield any density; thus this portion of the site has not been included as part of any density calculations. The Harrison Village property, which is generally bounded by North Fort Harrison Avenue to the east and North Osceola Avenue to the west and Georgia and Jones Streets to the north and south, respectively, is presently vacant. However, the southwest corner of the property previously consisted of four, two- story buildings constructed between 1925 and 1939 that totaled approximately 11,139 square feet, and the balance of the property consisted of eight buildings constructed between 1924 and 1992 by the Salvation Army. The Island View property, which is located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue approximately 150 feet north of Jones Street, was most recently developed with eight buildings between two and three stories in height that originated from the period between 1900 and 1955. All of these buildings were in varying states of disrepair prior to their recent demolition. Development Proposal: The development proposal consists of the construction of 324 attached dwelling units, 26,124 square feet of nonresidential floor area, and a 637 space robotic parking garage. The proposal also consists of the vacation of the existing and inadequate North Osceola Avenue right-of-way, and the dedication of a new, relocated North Osceola Avenue. As previously stated, the development proposal consists of two components: Harrison Village and Island View. The Harrison Village development component is approximately 38 feet in height (to roof deck) with an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments and will consist of 26,124 square feet of Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 2 0 0 nonresidential floor area at the ground level and 39 attached dwelling units within the second, third and fourth levels. The Island View development component is approximately 169 feet in height (to roof deck) with an additional 28 feet for architectural embellishments and will consist of the remaining 285 attached dwelling units, the 637 space robotic parking garage, and the amenities associated with the development (swimming pool, billiard room, game room, and unit storage facilities). Floor Area Ratio: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the Floor Area Ratio for properties located within the Old Bay character district is 0.5. The development proposal consists of a total of 26,124 square feet of nonresidential floor area, thereby leaving 3.67 acres with which to calculate the allowable residential density. Density: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable density for attached dwellings on a parcel of land greater than two acres in size that is located west of North Garden Avenue within the Old Bay character district is 50 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, based upon the above with regard to the Floor Area Ratio, the remaining 3.67 acres of the subject property would permit a maximum of 183 attached dwelling units. However, the development proposal consists of 324 attached dwelling units - 141 dwelling units more than is allowable. As such, the applicant has requested the use of 141 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool as made available by the Plan. The development proposal's compliance with the requirements for this additional density from the Pool is discussed later in the staff report. Building Heigh Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, within the Old Bay character district, the maximum allowable height is based upon a property's geographic location within the district. The Harrison Village development component is located east of North Osceola Avenue; therefore the maximum allowable height is 40 feet. The Island View development component is located west of North Osceola Avenue and between Drew and Georgia Streets; therefore the maximum allowable height is 150 feet. As proposed, the height of the Harrison Village development component is approximately 38 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments, which is consistent with the maximum allowable height as per the Plan. The Island View development component is approximately 169 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 28 feet for architectural embellishments, which exceeds the maximum set forth in the Plan. However, pursuant to the Plan, the Community Development Board (CDB) may consider granting an increase in the maximum building height specified in a character district if the developer of a site plan application provides a major public amenity, and the increase in height does not exceed 20% of the maximum permitted height. With regard to the Island View development component, the maximum permitted height within its geographic region of the Old Bay character district is 150 feet; therefore an increase in building height may not exceed 30 feet. The development proposal requires only 19 of the additional 30 feet permissible by the Plan. To obtain the additional 19 feet of height, the development proposal will provide major public amenities including: residential dwelling units within the Downtown area, a mixed-use project that will further the Plan's major redevelopment goals and character district vision, as well as significant contributions to the Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the provision of the above amenities, the requested additional 19 feet of building height for the Island View development component is supportable. Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-903, parking is required to be provided at a rate of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit for attached dwellings, and four parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for retail sales and service. Based upon the above ratios, the proposed 324 attached dwellings (486) and 26,124 square feet of retail sales and service floor area (104.49) requires a total of 591 parking spaces. Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 3 9 9 Pursuant to Section 3-1405, when any land, building or area is used for two or more uses that are listed in the shared parking table, the minimum number of required parking spaces shall be determined by multiplying the individual minimum parking requirements by the appropriate percentages listed in the table. The following table depicts the development proposals parking requirement as per the shared parking table: WEEKDAY WEE KEND Use: Midnight 6 A.M. 9 AM, 4 P.M. 6 P.M Midnight 9 A.M. 4 P.M. 6 RM. Midnight Residential (486) 100% = 486 60% = 291.6 90% = 437.4 80% = 388.8 90% = 437.4 Retail 104.49) 5% = 5.22 70% = 73.14 90% = 94.04 100% = 104.49 70% = 73.14 Totals: 491.22 364.74 531.44 493.29 510.54 Based upon the above, the development proposal requires a minimum of 532 parking spaces. As proposed, a total of 637 parking spaces will be provided on-site within a robotic parking garage; thus the development proposal will exceed its parking requirement. Solid Waste: Within the Harrison Village development component, trash compactors will be provided at the north and south ends of the development with access taken from North Osceola Avenue. With regard to the Island View development component, refuse/recycling rooms are provided within the north and south ends of the building with adjacent staging areas located outside the building footprint and accessed from Georgia Street and North Osceola Street, respectively. Signnage: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Utilities: All on-site utility facilities (i.e. electric and telecommunication lines) are required to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Provisions for the future undergrounding of existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right-of-way must be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and the City. Vacation/Rededication of North Osceola Avenue: The development proposal includes the vacation of the existing abutting portion of the North Osceola Avenue right-of-way and the subsequent rededication of right-of-way for a realigned North Osceola Avenue. North Osceola Avenue is presently a substandard 40-foot right-of-way with a pavement width of approximately 20 feet. It also makes three, roughly 90-degree, bends within close proximity of each other between Jones and Georgia Streets. The realignment of North Osceola Avenue will eliminate the northernmost bend and increase the distance between the two remaining bends. The rededicated right-of- way will be 50 feet in width with a pavement width of 24 feet; thus permitting two-way traffic to traverse this section of the road. Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The subject property is located within the Old Bay character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan identifies the Old Bay character district as a transitional area between the Downtown Core and the low density residential areas to the north. Further, the Plan envisions the district to be a mixed-use neighborhood supporting the Downtown employment base with residential, limited neighborhood commercial and office uses. Public Amenities Incentive Pool: To assist in the transformation of downtown Clearwater into a quality place in which to live, work and play, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes a Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 4 ® • Public Amenities Incentive Pool of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non- residential uses. The applicant is proposing the use of 141 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. The amenities provided by this development in order to justify the request from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool include the provision of 324 dwelling units (including those requested from the Pool) in the Downtown Plan area, and contributions to the Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan along North Fort Harrison Avenue, North Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street (valued at approximately $1.83 million). Further, the development proposal itself is a mixed-use project that will further the Plan's major redevelopment goals and character district vision, which is also an eligible amenity from which to enable the use of the Pool. Based upon the provision of these amenities, which are consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the request for 141 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool can be supported. Downtown Design Guidelines: As previously discussed, the development proposal consists of two distinct components: Harrison Village and Island View. Harrison Village is approximately 38 feet in height (to roof deck) with an additional 21 feet for architectural embellishments and will consist of 26,124 square feet of nonresidential floor area at the ground level and 39 attached dwelling units within the second, third and fourth levels. Island View is approximately 169 feet in height (to roof deck) with an additional 28 feet for architectural embellishments and will consist of the remaining 285 attached dwelling units, the 637 space robotic parking garage, and the amenities associated with the development. The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with regard to various elements associated with new construction in the Downtown. A review of these guidelines within the Plan was conducted and the following applicable items were identified: Block and Lot Characteristics: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the existing street grid pattern shall be retained where it contributes to an active pedestrian environment, and further that new vehicular and pedestrian access/circulation that effectively serves the proposed development and vicinity shall be provided if a vacation of right-of-way is requested. As previously discussed, the development proposal includes the vacation of that portion of the North Osceola Avenue right-of-way that abuts the subject property. The existing right-of-way is of substandard width and consists of two approximately 90-degree turns between Jones and Georgia Streets. The development proposal also includes the dedication of a new 50-foot wide right-of-way for North Osceola Avenue that is approximately 90 feet east of the present location of the right-of-way. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above Guidelines. Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that residential uses along Clearwater Harbor shall be designed with parking garages or parking areas internal to the site/building and screened from Clearwater Harbor and abutting rights-of-way. Further, the Guidelines state that parking garages shall be architecturally integrated with the design, materials, finish and color of the balance of the building. The development proposal includes a 637 space robotic parking garage within the Island View development component. The parking garage is screened from Clearwater Harbor and the adjacent Georgia Street and Jones Street rights-of-way by the balance of the building; thus the parking garage has no northern, southern, or western exposure. The ingress/egress points of the parking garage, which consists of seven platforms accessed by two driveways, takes access from North Osceola Avenue and as such is visible from said right-of-way. However, the visibility of the parking garage is limited to these ingress/egress points, as that portion of the east elevation associated with the parking garage has been designed in a manner that is architecturally consistent with the balance of the building. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above Guidelines. Pedestrian Circulation/Access: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that it is appropriate to provide pedestrian passageways that go through buildings, such as arcades. The development proposal includes Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 5 the provision of arcades along the east and west elevations of the Harrison Village development component. The provision of these arcades, which are interconnected through walkways internal to the building, will provide for improved pedestrian circulation along the retail storefronts of the building. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above Guideline. Site Elements: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that open spaces that function as transitions between the public sidewalks/streets and the uses of the property shall be provided. The development proposal includes open spaces at the four corners of the Harrison Village development component as well as two internal open spaces adjacent to fountains toward the north and south ends of the development. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above Guideline. Buffering and Screening: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. The buildings have been designed with the associated mechanical equipment located within the interior of the buildings. The primary loading and service areas for the development are located at the northeast and southeast corners of the Island View development component. These areas are located on curved/circular driveways and are screened by structural columns, fountains and landscaping. With regard to wireless communication facilities, it has been attached as a condition of approval that any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition of approval, the development proposal complies with above applicable Guideline. Orientation: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that building shall be oriented toward the street and that the orientation of the front fagade along the streetscape shall contribute to pedestrian interest in the area. The Harrison Village development component is bounded on all sides by various rights-of-way and has been designed with storefronts opening onto each right-of-way with arcades providing shelter for pedestrians. In addition, the Island View development component has been oriented toward the North Osceola Avenue right-of-way. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with above applicable Guideline. Scale and Hei hit: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the size and proportions of new development should be related to the scale of nearby buildings and that new development should respect the vertical height of existing or approved adjacent buildings and contribute to a pedestrian scale. The Guidelines further state that the apparent height of a building/development can be influenced and augmented by a combination of step backs, varying building heights and horizontal features. The more notable building heights in the surrounding area include the Church of Scientology's Sandcastle, which is approximately 70 feet in height, the 60-foot tall Osceola Inn, and the 70-foot tall Belvedere Apartments. The balance of the surrounding development ranges in height between 15 and 35 feet. The Harrison Village development component, which has a proposed height of 39 feet, will be consistent with the heights of the surrounding buildings and the architectural embellishments such as the clock towers and parapet walls, which extend an additional 21 feet above the roof deck, will provide further visual interest and reinforce the Mediterranean influenced architectural style of the development. The Island View development component, while taller than the surrounding developments will be complimentary and relate to their scale through the use of step backs and various architectural features. Specifically, the development includes two distinct step backs: an 11-foot step back between the first two levels and the mid-rise section of the building, and a 58-foot step back between the mid-rise and high-rise sections. Building articulation consists of cornice lines, balconies and coping to differentiate the building levels. Additionally, while the principle roof has a height of 169 feet, architectural embellishments, including a cupola and parapet walls extend an additional 28 feet will provide further visual interest. The height is Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 6 • • also mitigated as it is split between two towers rather than a solitary monolithic structure. This creates extensive negative and positive space on all sides of the building, thereby adding to the visual aesthetics. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Rh3ghm/Spacing_ The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". Further, the Guidelines state that with regard to high-rise buildings the building levels or step backs should be differentiated by architectural features such as coping, cornice lines and material changes; and that there should be a proportional relationship between the height of a building and the number and dimensions of step backs used to mitigate the height of the building. Both development components consist of a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". The arcades define the "base" of Harrison Village, the varying roof styles and towers define the "cap" and the area in between, which consists of windows and balconies, defines the "middle". With regard to the aforementioned high-rise criteria, the building consists of numerous step backs and vertical plane changes that not only create visual interest and mitigate the height of the building, but also serve to define the "base", "middle" and "cap" of the building. These step backs and plane changes are accented by cornices and pre-cast trim bands, which also add aesthetic value to the building. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Architecture: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that multiple buildings within a single project shall relate architecturally to each other and the surrounding neighborhood. The fagades of the two development components will complement and visually support each other as they incorporate similar arched elements, canopies, and balconies as well as an extensive use of windows in keeping with the Mediterranean influenced architectural style. The Mediterranean style of the development is consistent with the intent of the Guidelines as it is complementary to the fabric of the surrounding neighborhood. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Primary and Corner Facades: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the primary facade is to be the most highly designed facade and utilize plane changes (i.e. projections and recesses), architectural details, variety in color, material and textures, and storefront display windows for retail uses. Further, the Guidelines state that buildings on corner lots shall emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. As previously stated, the facade of the Island View development component consists of numerous step backs and vertical plane changes that create visual interest. The elevations also consist of architectural details, such as: decorative balconies, awnings, copper and barrel tile roofs, decorative pre-cast trim and cornices. The fagades of the Harrison Village development component are architecturally consistent with those for Island View with the exception of the copper roofs. The Harrison Village development component effectively encompasses an entire block; therefore it consists of four corners. Each of these corners will consist of a decorative clock tower that rises above the balance of the building and serves to set the development apart from the surrounding properties. The facades are also heavily detailed and incorporate an arcade along the east and west elevations, which provide the plane changes desired by the Guidelines. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above applicable Guidelines. Windows and Doors: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that windows shall be provided along all streets; that windows in commercial areas are appropriately sized to allow for display and views into the building; and that bulkheads shall be provided below and transoms above display windows. The buildings have been designed with appropriately sized windows along all streets; however the windows associated with the nonresidential element of the Harrison Village development component do not include the required bulkheads or transoms. As these elements would be consistent with the architectural style of the building, it is attached as a condition of approval that the storefront windows are revised to Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 7 9 • include both bulkheads and transoms in a manner consistent with the architectural style. Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition of approval, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Roof Design: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that multiple rooftops shall be provided on varying levels of large buildings so as to break-up the massing of the building. The Island View development component consists of numerous building step backs and a 124-foot horizontal separation between the two towers. This results in multiple rooftops at varying heights and of varying styles (pitched and flat). Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Other Architectural Features: The Downtown Design Guidelines state awnings shall be provided that protect pedestrians from inclement weather. While awnings have not specifically been provided in a manner that would protect pedestrians, the development proposal does provide an arcade along the storefronts of the Harrison Village component that will effectively accomplish the same task. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Materials: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the building materials utilized shall be consistent with and relate to the architectural style of the building. The proposed building materials consist of both smooth and scored stucco walls, concrete barrel tile roofs, casement windows, raised stucco bands, ornamental railings, and decorative balconies with trellises as well as pre-cast decorative columns, medallions, and trim. Based upon the utilization of the above building materials, which are all consistent with the Mediterranean influenced architectural style; the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Color: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the number and type of building colors should be appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. The applicant has identified the proposed color scheme as consisting of "tones of terracotta, cream, ochre and mustard, offset by accents of a deeper hue. Lighter tones will be used to accentuate advancing planes with the color tone becoming progressively stronger on the building planes away from the street. The entrance porticoes will signal their function and importance with the strongest, or most contrasting color. Window and doorframes will be darker. Pediments andparapets will be the lightest color to outline the building against the sky. Contrasting color awnings will provide accent points. Trellises will be a lighter color to set off the greenery growing over them. The base of the building will have a finish of contrasting three-dimensional colored banding which will have the appearance of horizontal stone coursing (blocks) ". As stated by the applicant, the proposed color scheme is consistent with and appropriate for the architectural style of the buildings. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the following applicable Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified: ? Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. The development proposal will provide neighborhood-scale retail uses, urban residential uses, and streetscapes consistent with the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan, as well as buildings located along and oriented towards all abutting streets. As such, the project is consistent with the above Vision. ? Vision: Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues should be redeveloped as pedestrian oriented streets and in conjunction with Cleveland Street form the major retail core Downtown. The development Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 8 proposal will provide neighborhood-scale retail uses, urban residential uses as well as the streetscape improvements consistent with the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Vision. ? Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The proposed buildings incorporate a Mediterranean-influenced style of architecture. The building utilizes high- quality materials such as stucco and a terra cotta barrel tile roof. Attractive architectural detailing, including the use of coping and trim bands, will add to the aesthetic quality of the building. The buildings will be painted attractive bright earth-tone colors and will include an extensive use of step backs and articulation of the fenestration. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Vision. ? Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. This project will provide a density of 66.66 units per acre and is a pioneering mixed-use project for downtown within the Old Bay character district. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Goal. ? Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The development proposal provides 324 attached dwellings and 26,124 square feet of nonresidential floor area as part of an attractive mixed-use development. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Objective. ? Objective lE: A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents. The development proposal provides for 26,124 square feet of new nonresidential floor area, which will further the provision of a stable employment center and additional employment opportunities. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Objective. ? Objective 1H: The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall' evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provides a pool of development potential from which projects may acquire additional dwelling units. This development proposal includes a request to utilize 141 dwelling units from the Pool to achieve the desired density for the site and thereby increasing the viability and vibrancy of the project. The proposal includes approximately $1.83 million in streetscape improvements for North Fort Harrison Avenue, North Osceola Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street, which will be consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Objective. ? Objective 1K: Downtown shall be a safe environment for both residents and visitors by addressing real and perceived public safety issues. The immediate area, with some notable exceptions, is characterized by low-quality, attached dwellings generally poorly maintained which contribute to a real and perceived impression of a lack of safety. The redevelopment of this site with attractive high- quality structures and the influx of additional residents and shoppers will improve the appearance of the area, contributing to a safer environment. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Objective. ? Objective 2A: The Downtown street grid should be maintained to provide multiple access points in and through Downtown, to assist in dispersing traffic on various routes and contribute to improved traffic operations. Vacation of streets shall be evaluated based on redevelopment potential provided Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 9 alternative access exists or can be provided. The existing grid system will be improved by the development proposal. The existing North Osceola Avenue right-of-way that abuts the project will be vacated and a new right-of-way for North Osceola Avenue with a standard width of 50 feet and a pavement width of 24 feet will be dedicated approximately 90 feet to the east of its present location. The result will be the elimination of one of the three existing 90-degree turns and greater spacing between the remaining two 90-degree bends. The street also takes advantage of a relatively low traffic volume along North Osceola Avenue by locating the principle access points to the project from that street. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Objective. ? Objective 2H: A variety of parking solutions for motorized and non-motorized vehicles shall be pursued to support redevelopment while maintaining ease of access and parking throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes a new concept in structured parking called "robotic parking." The particular system proposed with this development works essentially by the user driving onto a platform. The driver exits the vehicle and the vehicle is then moved automatically into the most convenient space within the garage. The vehicle will not leave that platform until the driver retrieves the vehicle. ? Objective 21: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes the provision of streetscape improvements along North Osceola Avenue, North Fort Harrison Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street that are consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan; thus compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ? Goal 3: Create Downtown as a memorable place to be enjoyed by residents and visitors that capitalizes on Clearwater's waterfront location, natural resources, built environment and history. The development proposal will increase density and set a new design standard within the Old Bay character district while providing for an attractive streetscape through commercial uses, striking buildings, new streetscaping and landscaping. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Goal. ? Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The development proposal consists of buildings that will complement the existing pattern of development along North Fort Harrison and North Osceola Avenues incorporating arched elements, canopies, balconies and an extensive use of windows as part of a Mediterranean-revival style of architecture. The step backs will result in the appearance to passersby of a building in harmony with other buildings in the area. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Objective. ? Policy 1: The Downtown Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. The development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines as it incorporates a detail rich Mediterranean-revival style architecture that utilizes high-quality materials, such as stucco and terracotta barrel tile roofs. The proposed design also incorporates an extensive use of step backs and articulation of the fenestration and a variety of architectural details such as balconies, railings, awnings, a covered arcade, coping, parapet walls, etc. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Policy. ? Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan envisions the Old Bay character district as a mixed-use neighborhood supporting the Downtown employment base with Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 -Page 10 residential, limited neighborhood commercial and office uses. Staff has worked diligently with the applicant to create a development that is consistent with this vision. It is specifically noted that the Island View development component is consistent with that portion of the character district vision, which provides for an opportunity for higher-density residential uses along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue. Based upon the above, the development proposal will be consistent with the above Policy. ? Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The proposed design of the site and buildings contributes to the pedestrian environment by providing an active streetscape including wide sidewalks, fountains, seating, lush landscaping, shade provided by awnings and an arcade, and ground floor nonresidential floor area. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Policy. ? Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development will utilize 141 dwelling units from the pool. The proposal includes approximately $1.83 million in streetscape and wayfinding improvements for North Osceola Avenue, North Fort Harrison Avenue, Jones Street and Georgia Street. These improvements will be consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Policy. ? Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based upon the scale of the project. Amenities for the site include a swimming pool, hot tub, billiard room, game room, and unit storage facilities. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Policy. ? Policy 25: The City shall give priority to sidewalk construction within Downtown that enhances pedestrian linkages and/or completes a continuous sidewalk system on all streets. The development proposal includes sidewalks along North Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues as well as Jones and Georgia Streets. The sidewalks will include interlocking pavers, benches, shaded arcades, solid waste containers and streetlights matching the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan. As such, the project will be consistent with the above Policy. Old Bay Character District Policies: The following applicable policies shall govern development within the District, as well as City actions: ? The Public Incentives Amenities Pool shall not be available to any property located on the west of Osceola Avenue between Eldridge Street and the northern boundary of the Old Bay character district. The subject property is located south of Eldridge Street; therefore it is eligible for the Public Amenities Incentive Pool from which the project proposes the use of 141 dwelling units. ? New development on North Fort Harrison Avenue shall be oriented toward the street to encourage pedestrian activity and a dynamic street life. The development proposal includes new development oriented towards all abutting streets including North Fort Harrison Avenue. Nonresidential uses are proposed to be located along North Fort Harrison Avenue with residential uses facing all streets. Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 11 ? Mixed-use development that has office and retail uses on the ground floor and residential uses above are encouraged along North Fort Harrison Avenue. As stated above, the development proposal includes the provision of nonresidential floor area on the ground floor along North Fort Harrison Avenue with residential uses above. ? Preferred housing styles east of Osceola Avenue are single-family detached and townhouses. Attached dwellings in this area may be considered upon assembly of at least one acre and preferably one city block. The development proposal includes a land assemblage of just over five acres and more than 90 percent of a city block. As such, the development proposal will be consistent with the intent of this Policy. Based upon the above, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the standards and criteria as per Section 2-903 and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 50 dwelling units per acre 66.66 dwelling units per acre X* (243 dwelling units) (324 dwelling units) Floor Area 0.5 0.5 X Ratio Height East of 40 feet 38 feet X** Osceola West of 150 feet 169 feet Osceola Parking Spaces Attached 1.5 spaces per unit 637 parking spaces X Dwellings (486 spaces) Retail 4 / 1,000 square feet GFA (105 spaces) * See above discussion regarding Density. ** See above discussion regarding Building Height. Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 12 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.C.: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development X is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project X creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District Design X Guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the General Applicability Standards as per Section 3-913: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, X bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and X use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of X the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 -Page 13 9 0 COMPLIANCE WITH DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the Downtown Design Guidelines as per the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Site Design: Blocks and Lot Characteristics X 2. Site Design: Access, Circulation and Parking X 3. Site Design: Site Elements X 4. Building Placement: Location X 5. Building Placement: Orientation X 6. Building Placement: Separation X 7. Building Placement: Building Coverage X 8. Building Placement: Additional Requirements for Character Districts and X Special Areas 9. Building Design: Form X 10. Building Design: Architecture X 11. Signs N/A N/A 12. Lighting N/A N/A 13. Property Maintenance N/A N/A 14. Pinellas Trail N/A N/A 15. Utility/Infrastructure Facilities N/A N/A 16. Corporate Design N/A N/A SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on November 3, 2005, and found the application to be sufficient. In addition, the basic concept and form of the development proposal is consistent with the site plan and architectural elevations previously approved by the Board. The development proposal will further the City's goals of improving the character of the Downtown as well as promoting private sector investment within the Downtown area. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development with 324 attached dwelling units (141 from Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 26,124 square feet of nonresidential floor area, an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 169 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 28 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) for that portion of the development on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, an additional 21 feet (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for that portion of the development on the east side of North Osceola Avenue as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 903.C., based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and with the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 5.06-acre subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) and Preservation (P) Future Land Use Plan categories; 2. That the portion of the subject property (0.1995 acres) located within the Preservation (P) Future Land Use Plan category and does not generate density; 3. That this application for Flexible Development is an amendment to a Flexible Development application that was previously approved by the Board at its meeting of July 19, 2005. 4. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the Old Bay character district; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Old Bay character district; Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 14 0 6 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; 7. That the use of 141 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C; 9. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3- 913; and 10. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all nonresidential uses proposed to be located on site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground; 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable; 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way, and that separate right-of-way permits are obtained for all paver brick sidewalks along City streets; 11. That the storefront windows associated with the Harrison Village development component are revised to include both bulkheads and transoms in a manner consistent with the architectural style; 12. That evidence of filing of a Unity of Title with Pinellas County is submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 13. That any dwelling units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not built are returned to the Pool; 14. That all streetscaping within the North Fort Harrison Avenue, North Osceola Avenue, Georgia Street and Jones Street rights-of-way is installed pursuant to the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan and to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 15. That if the conditions of approval associated with the development are not meet, then the incentives gained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool are returned to the Pool; 16. That the newly dedicated North Osceola Avenue right-of-way between Jones and Georgia Streets will be improved as per City standards prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 17. That if the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 15 0 0 be completed by the applicant and at their expense and that if underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements; 18. That all fire hydrant assemblies installed at a distance greater than 10 feet from a water main are constructed with ductile iron pipe and have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line and at the fire hydrant assembly; 19. That the applicant coordinates with the City's Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a Development Order to assure that adequate sanitary sewer service will be provided to the subject property and surrounding properties based upon the relocation of utilities associated with the new North Osceola Avenue right-of-way; 20. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by December 20, 2006); and 21. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner IH ATTACHMENTS: Photographs of the Site and Vicinity Aerial Map Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: (Planning Department) C D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIFt Harrison Ave N 410 Harrison Village Island View (D) - 12-20-05(R7)IFt Harrison Ave N 410 -Staff Report. doc Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 16 0 Robert G. Tefft 46 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefftnmyclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to present • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida • Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized date and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. • Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. • Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, FL October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 FLD2005-09098 - Page 17 0 0 Iv Li a( '? MARSNgLL ` BE MARSHALL NT Sf A GRANT y c? CPRLTON ??-^ ? i' GUUUUUJ ? L___J F7,GWµ C jF] TANGERINE Sr w ST ?(uC ENGMM! ? Pq? =LA 5, BUFF a 87 Z PALM BUFF ST / /R2 PALM BLUFF ) 1 L a sT ? o rc sr / U7 wuc .uRGENS 571 mmo METTO ? a 0 ca N I C"OLSON L Da ? [ill E;T ?a17 ? ? ? ? iy EIDRID( ST T j ?g3®11 L? ^uwF si ?L MAPLE LEE ST a PLAZA a GEDRG[A W El [ < PROJECT SITE N?o a WICKSON 0 l o a JONES ??t??]???pC?C? 2 U u DREW {Wy ST ? SR' 590 YY a? o{ona ii ??Q? GROm 1! 1 ?J< q I?IDRIOICV7 ? ? ? 0??1?• RLU IL-y LAURA N ? El ?0 =- r7t? 0 &R60 CISVEUWO sr ?? o ?K= PARK a E ? ERCE ST ???? ?% EW PIERCE ST PIE170E ST COURT ST V ? ? ? 5Z fi ? COULD ? ? CIR ODURT FIEN Ei El L ST CHESTNUT ST COURT RO Rp a ? ? a ? El = - ] E a a i ; TURNER El PINE d d PINE PINS 37 P. ST 02 V p .. PME S Location Map Owner. Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC. Case: FLD2005-09098 Site: 302,303,30 4,308, and 309 North Osceola Property 5.06 Avenue ; 410 Jones Street; and 410 North Size(Acres): Fort Harrison Avenue Atlas 277B Page: PIN: 09-29-15-44352-002-0010 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 09-29-15-00000-430-0400. 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-14310-000-0 100 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Ft Harrison Avenue N 410 Harrison Village Island View (D) - 12-20-05(RT)\Maps\Ft Harrison Avenue N410- Location Map.doc • • Aerial Map Owner: Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC. Case FLD2005-09098 Site: 302, 303, 304, 308, and 309 North Osceola Property 5.06 Avenue ; 410 Jones Street; and 410 North Size(Acres): Fort Harrison Avenue Atlas 277B PIN: 09-29-15-44352-002-0010 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 ,): \mannrng ueparrmenr\U u ti\VLLX (fLllJ \t'ending cases\Up for the next CDB\Ft Harrison Avenue N410 Harrison Village Island View (D) - 12-20-05(RT)\Maps\Ft Harrison Avenue N 410 - Aerial Map.doc • • Zoning Map Owner. Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC. Case: FLD2005-09098 Site: 302, 303, 304, 308, and 309 North Osceola Property 5.06 Avenue ; 410 Jones Street; and 410 North Size(Acres): Fort Harrison Avenue Atlas 2778 PIN: 09-29-1544352-002-0010 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-00000430-0600 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000430-0500 09-29-15-00000430-0300 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Ft Harrison Avenue N 410 Harrison Village Island View (D) - 12-20-05(RT)\Maps\Ft Harrison Avenue N 410 -Zoning Map.doc • • 512 500 ; ' ; I---' t I 1 56 1 ---- 7 1 It _ A 509 151.0 r-' ' L_ LI 509 n 506 I 504 a es ice le d 1 at splWW'- , GEORGIA ST I 407 `i ---- ? CY} - 1- ao 1 _ i 404 r --- 404 405 I 1 1 1 I 403 1 ? - '-- 402 409 r- ® 401 ^ 400 10 '0 401 --- ?i ?'-- ? r__ -J333 31Nrt1ttache aid 1 - 31 , 1 321 _ - $ g L__J ? ! _i rzp r1 2 mati /n b ---7 W6 0 317 e, ? 1 y 304 310 I_ t r? Iry1? 302 _j 34 YY - = I 305 I 1 i j_ r 0 -- ?- ' 3ot1 >tce - 1 ---1 I 1 3011 I I 1 O 302 I---1 1 .-? I I I I i--1 I I-7 I I I r' 1--1 300'1 - Ir 1 1 c1 13 1 1 1 1 1J I ?- ?- JONES ST i .'1 ti ?r?^`^? a 'a )7 ^? ? N ry 7 e ? 1 225 1 ) OtV 0 7 -- ? ' I j ` ? t -------"- ; `. -?'vernight`--I---- ---, , - Overnigh??'J {- Accolll da 'O Pl ice W hi ?- r , '? '" C?OIIII O tOas -, r ?2f t,I i -- 201 % =1 --------- 200 Res au to ? ' I o 298 DREW ST cWi h O a - Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC. Case: FLD2005-09098 Site: 302, 303, 304, 308, and 309 North Osceola Property 5.06 Avenue ; 410 Jones Street; and 410 North Size(Acres): Fort Harrison Avenue Atlas 277B Page: PIN: 09-29-15-44352-002-0010 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) Vending cases\Up for the next CDB\Ft Harrison Avenue N 410 Harrison Village island view (D) - 12-20-05(RT)\Maps\Ft Harrison Avenue N410- Existing Uses Map.doc • 0 500 ' CRD 51 I `-__ __ 5m7 "I 509 r---- I - I CB ?; L 1 C 501 407 404 f 1-4 405 , 403 _ I 403 WATER 2 3 I --- 401 J-Lr- 401 I-___ r'-1 31? I 3 J 1 --- I 327 0 _ 3i1 CB I I ? E-I l ' ? - Od I r r 1 I-- ?---?I 5 317 304 J 11 r- 302 11 -?2 3D5 L?30-ti I I--1 L.r- lL, ? I 30 -- I ?I I if ` J --- ? 30f j 1 I 2 I _ ? I 30o I r O L----- _ ?1 l ?- A--r -- JONES ST I 225 1 r --------- _. J/ ??I 221 `-' J ? C>>$? ` _ - I----------- ' 200 a a a I Q I W DREW ST CBD a CBD ; --- il I r An Eal ;4 z I - l Future Land Use Map Owner. Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC. Case: FLD2005-09098 Site: 302, 303, 304, 308, and 309 North Osceola Property 5.06 Avenue ; 410 Jones Street; and 410 North Size(Acres): Fort Harrison Avenue Atlas 277B Page: PIN: 09-29-15-44352-002-0010 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 SAI'lanning Department\C D 8\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Ft Harrison Avenue N 410 Harrison Village Island View (D) - 12-20-05(RT)\Maps\Ft Harrison Avenue N 410 - Future Land Use Map.doc r - --1 5849 I 1 301 6 5 506 506 3 4 SU4 ' SUU r-- I ? L 07940 p 44352 ` 779.9, w ? n ry o v a J I z 37890 p F21 1 1 , 1 z IT.-I -Z --- ` ----20 • 51319 2 511 18 - 3 507 17 a -- 4 M 505 16 - w 2 5 U T z 50f f4 7 4UC. 405 13 w 403 12 9 402 4pf i- O 11 c 70 40 f o? \ 309 , 8 ' 6 i 5 , 307 4 ------- - -------- _--- I ; , , z f 3 14 443 `44353 225 I . co / li j 6 5964 i ' I I 10 9 i 8 I 7 i 6 8 I 7 5 8 6 t I I I? m -- ---1------- Vk -------- 1 z 61 1 2 3 4 1 5 4' 1 1 2 I 3 1 1 1 3 i Comparative Map: Previously Approved Site Plan Boundaries and Revised / Proposed Site Plan Boundaries Portion Removed Realigned ? N. Osceola Ave. Previously Approved Site 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2005-09098 Harrison Village / Island View 1: View looking southeast from Osceola and Georgia. L; U .? 0. vtcw wvnuir, wcbL uvui I?L. naniNvii auu ",uvirpa • 2: View looking east from Georgia. 8 5: View looking southwest from Ft. Harrison. 6: View looking northwest from Ft. Harrison. 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2005-09098 Harrison Village - 1 4: View looking southwest from Ft. Harrison. 7: View looking southeast from Osceola and Jones gel ?"r ii? n T v 1? M? •? 8: View looking east from Osceola. "0. 1 9: View looking east from Osceola. 11: View looking southwest from Ft. Harrison. 12: View looking northwest from Ft. Harrison. 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2005-09098 Harrison Village - 2 11 `° y R 11 1 11 ar ? rr tr?? rr • • 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2005-09098 Harrison Village Photo Key A- :." 17: View looking northeast from Osceola. 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2005-09098 Harrison Village - 3 13: View looking southeast from Osceola. 14: View looking northeast from Osceola. 15: View looking northeast from Osceola. 16: View looking northeast from Osceola. 18: View looking southeast from Osceola. .1 1 0 ..?.?_-ate .i:Y 1: View looking northwest from Osceola. L ' 1w _ q Ef I 3: View looking northwest from Osceola. 4: View looking north from Osceola. xV , A yeti. 5: View looking northeast from Osceola. 6: View looking northeast from Osceola. 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2005-09098 Island View - 1 2:View looking west from Osceola. 7: View looking northwest from Osceola. r ?i r 'ice-+?? t i6/r r b i - o; -- -OFF"", 9: View looking northwest from Osceola. x ice' r S 11: View looking southwest from Osceola. 12: View looking southwest from Osceola. 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2005-09098 Island View - 2 8: View looking west from Osceola. 10: View looking northwest from Osceola. t ??t 4 r 1:. tt Mide 8 41 6 ??__ r p o 404 A S L West Side .t 312 fs 5 A C2 4-04 3 D I I 07940 JGA4lI 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue FLD2005-09098 Island View Photo Key East , ?o?, aFa ?t ?t 0 1?( 2 1 7 2 He EEO -Ell Ong / ? 5 1 " l 1 1 h PAuRTIIA L FLOOR PLAN PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION SLALE ve•= ra Z ? ? 1M¢4 t? yy t f O O O ftb PARTIAL BUILDING SECTION 3 SGALE'. t/8'•t•.P ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 3 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER a?a?? ORIGINAL RECENED NOV 2 3 2005 3 i PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER EA3T E-A"oN r OsQ g? ?? o a w w' w 4 os-az ?U? LEGEND t,xe.l r.erDu mo.ccr owxDenr aKArwa/nLDAr •BDK En$llxa x EnSrrxc aleAM° waerEe GRAPHIC SCA n r?A.AIa I ? ( L ? 0 tea c.xoer ro vn.a roaz"o•ovm '$4? x I1 _ ____ ?, mEE inpTYi ? x « ? 1 1 I LE n/e x o. / / xx'? x ? x x x x rn x / / 1 x x x x x x - / :rem , , ar u+iv:> I 31 I tt 4 rra y • 1 / ?' t p c x x x t A .axe l rxw'r x ? m•xm RNING /' 1 ?? x . x xext _ ?' x 9 x Qp xx x ?. IKE x I jr x)'t k x .. a axn?..x"iTi / rre•ma x x x 1 .r / xr x x x?tp x r x x l a 9 x -------- ------- 1 4 x ------ ------ ------------- ? '? S ,C ? a wm m? T--- rm ?-rr°? e to to r a.r . `?r?""iuv?vw nr r A ??1 JL__, a _-JL-_! - 1 , ` `?? rue es .ronES sm¢r GENERAL NOTES yyq t tiw vnn x•'?imm, pa? Yrt rp S ?: ? ? ..• sd rd's`. ? ? ' • r+a? : woa._ro-?N,apo-a,p rra? , °a`_'MmM ?4. ?- x !?- ? 'I aspnD.. 1 o.ra. k p-a-?o-ovooo-? ? ? ,? m?wrtw , ? ",,.r ?-I aun..m nano. rnm , acw".m navD. ? ? e 'T?y A ?? , •raA. k aa-b-ISVAW-1A°WI YMICFL 1 . °?k Q? L ac.:n.m naaw V S9 d ? y ` ea+si r. xo rx.vi"''. o ess °P0 Q t ? : ...Y? ? ® a?nrm ra.a. y ,? p- nro-k,,,a-aaa-Daxi W- T-A ?«am:r. .., 'I , ear ua am .orm Down / Mrr0. vus a smwa ? i i 1 . ? Y;J O r'aa 4 ?-i ?I ` ? a. pfela40 uA aEr.E / an¢ / .rtratD D'.nWNa9 w4° u2 i ? k ro*.. me xea «unsa na.a: s?ra?. er ss ? ?, ro 2 e?c naxi_s_aar f}e• A z S I rae,aaD.eD ! aw •C yy.-? F"'S'' f ? .. snsaa<k ®aaimm raa?a ,?, ? ? p I Y t ,,o. dr YAM L1 .mrt(nvrwuuq • ry ""'?.1 t ka'r"aw . w?l aw, (USr w?iD o ?}?. Q a: Id mw WnaaU am r, lwr awq ? a ¢ ??. r r '?` •cMwE?? am r?i Ppr eurB mtw pax e.D? ? ? ??1Y'" Ovn +nu7 ma.Pnrr+reuwn a O z L r A r ewer Bawd p ra ry(nyDxx rmwA.ar Mraa (acrsur rerun noP Y (aa n,?ear° 9 YA,9 a°1a W pct umq K r U rte •iv 1 I C_ ` ? p rAm rMdrl a- a Uf rYAM ap a. Q.KI WDWI t n o d '' • oA' x. PKr nYn1I as N QAr MrOflN I L' ? x ? ? „ ? 1 ?? ,. w.onrs. x.x mwrr w-sa n. ?r-j' p ?? n+mosEn a1Da raa,r w-r rr. a.vu?, ?/mc . n.xD "r. ,uet (I ai ` m,A, ? p rM.Rn f b? rW-Y rr. DA/xD n[vr maml ®` Ial ' x ? I ? (xw er. ro "aar DEa1 d -'; ? ? _ ?_? ? A 1 r .rx nc avvAx Danra maoYa. m p.mr.crars ? j ? '°" 6 a wsnxD erxowc roonxwr ar¢u m a +mcD - vav.re s (D.u rwl Q 9 z IC/z w..wx _ ? y ?, I? - sw. a? p?nwrta? o?ax E'- ?d ?I ? a? I ?? A+. ? , rovror w. a r[a,®,w .woxuaw wD ? .,« a.m z ii-- _ *xj ` " iu.ru is ,rn °C"'u•us.wrc ro «." Ara caAVArs w arrm. z W W F ?1i ??? ? I. nr ri err ras non n.oa° me k (rma . r?4 .r?rx7?. ".:ar su 3 in d ?- ? ? ? ? 1 n"•n rsOOm raweo00oxi ? a ooxrs° w . re 0. 6 'r A I L aweaxnmE atw xaarADE au tt suerrRO s W ra • uuAR . nun rper •wucarar. '-' Y V a. {? xa m w?nr ?r aaa. ?k a "rz wa.•n a •a . ?x o SN!® ', r I , Am ?.w?a"?r» b'soi:::.'aaAman S, ? i ar•" , .. n e ? a W.nvn""YOD rr wrnn "° nawn nc .a. tvewr.,m YY rw aav root wx ° `W m' (7 .om ofwDS urm /atr AenMEe sna rta wrFar srm I r w ''r1° sKa w, rme me)a ?`e'sias a:a '?' .•.•,? ? 6 , W. ' -d rml I_.? ` mrxk a?a®tns(w rG b??$w•ci r ? b. i. ? .aa. I mrmsrx naswsf+.ar .U au.nsOwp W. L 1 ? A.Ae mDmnris m,.,..A s m,s rw ..twos e/. I. ' I" P) sa`aa. aan_ .rn.s:';??:tars rq - „ ? ?? •""? tared s (nn Ar ra.•na s (aa no ni. y?y ??-?? wa ?ii'. ?ir?aYQram- an I.nramy p s .e.av. y' wam rD„an fMl If- r ?¢? ?'?_. , a?r?a0?u°nA6 -A74wstorn -Ofmm m,r ? r?mrn '? .a.?v. ? « m+R uete • A"n9a nuep Iw •ah 3 d " alirars (»un/raq i arr,nr: aawmaa,s Dn„r data w,o oms" c Arz nenae, as a ..am - ®? :.?I L ' sc?rm. a arxeeraS aA4NID. d Aaom A rslaawa warrzaN"F - - gg ?? V ©:a.u. t ' m aoor??m ;art e.??, ra Q+ae pe?awa•m ?,.rra v arun.rn err.n d. x'. rnsrAa wWi ar n.n ,U imrr n•• r ry?pyLLu m rY?Y GYY yl ?? As L({rr y9 rnD•pm Art wear ?(,,,??? ? h,? d 4 (? TM F 1 e.roalD parr a run mA].9?_Y L6lY1C] A --;?+?/s? -1" os?.?, $-'+??y°?-?-??I < L xi arm s.a.*EO,r.rmr wecr rm .nc oue eww ,° rsarwa ar nnA.° ro.rn a G? nr.xzrm. m uux.rt ." ,. ?/ \ '!?? \ I ?? :siss"urcirwnonw, aaas rnsr. cwrncr Mr crttn IT r. eswa mr¢ dust rude w r-r «c rw 4 OP 8 RECEIVED NOV 2 3 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 •' ORIGINAL GENERAL NOTES: etnAArnSC.NE rnanrtcr. xarN L.rK a ?ssoo.rts «a 4° ?or`? ? °°::,a LEGEND ..«T..w°a..-.x..o.x Wx.°e'ro:. / a?pii[?iamau mun n.w•/ ° ? (LrP.) TWIGK xi 1r°.)°oO°' ? sm rol• vRn,[CT BalrlA.rtY fn (M19iN.NG 0°N .Ba.4 UI i.•rm eu [mrec r9¢ cwanr ro rmul r _ _ _ _ _ . x mlw. 9 ?imrme x.+w mx:v rr ? f:°I eexr.a min m. / ,{il i-.mr u. rn o rv.? w ?wnuc'w.l? \ „rTM e9r . M4, r v ? . ,,, . ? o?•wrlnar ...xx« 6 ? , ` ? . wer w'?'[weo., n•oo e.?sr. sure .o. a.oa Kwsss: fTii?Aa-oe?sn r?: .M61: -SIaJ10b00.WW VIAISLA W-?At9 µ4a2-n93-9Ma tl?FMM.rER R°w°?°UE CIFw..rER RMeaxa r.11C6 x: IYwIYW9-mW rMe6 rA. nu-?-ts..]sx-W2-WI3 ?.i..ren Raieoi1UE at1pi.M .v m n9?iro.n v.vcn x -n-In-coaao-uo-awo v.m¢. ,t: -av-I awa-aoa-aoxo il. x osn[an .wa[ ?w oNrei?2 .ossss Z C l(j .? L? N' Q ?p t,} ?' II ri [lesrwe r9ez ro a x[sovm 9ggg x - ? i ? *W .x.. r4 ,ro:r / e ' 1^'. 2 e - * ? ac....rm nww au.°+ran noe. vuno. .. a9-a9-,°-oow°-..1o-aew o.ma tx ,Y000OY.w-am O - t BIRLHa rOatORIM ! x „ I / _ . _ - "#?? -T' " xa t«raKAL rn A ?M SQax ..fn9E ne .) I R „ .maer[cTUlrm, vuras ;? - . i i _? _ _ _ _ _ 7 "'?_\ I ., _ yy yy 41 r at 1 . ? E „ ?A_ iT xf ?.. WwJ i / ,e --- w ? r 1 R. ? - 1 /a I'll r / ? /\\ i I r , ` vum s , I ?x?o?o°om°.?aa v.nm tx .ioan'•osanu'o ?o°I° ,w no.or. a>x wnw.rzn wro, r41G6 S 09-? ,?Y LSa? 1° rmrsia imncss ? 3 I ] Q ; p ? I `t 5 ?Y ?' ?' I\ y ( m.vx ' me no W. vum a ?als-o»W-coo-ma ; 9 ..17 GRAPHI. / Z % a Q [ A pS a I I Y „ • 'Z°t x • / / 'g I: _ • ? ? ` , a[.9nmt ???:°c A veesQ.r use .rt olm I>resuxMCS / ar.A s°as . sex°¢ I- F.++ .? ? 3 '1j % x ? xf N f" L -{ Y'e ? ' ` ? lLa¢°.W uss AnY. / ana / .rr.om VlpsaLS uca u2 3 roi/ 92 ll? N Ndn spl MLLKE29 (zl K) w? Isx 1i 1+i-?L?1 1 / / U IL1 I17! I I x x q i. ? ~ I Q S r ?. ? _ M ,I , ? ? a 6nSSa ® (a 4 KI deo K r-ar-v.r t Z N- / j a L Z I x x „ «..ee Q / I 1 n C / . a d? y !. F't_ i m ?. ?,' rm :uw?rW '' tMa ? I? ..1 y?7 L ? ®® e s[re.ua ?p4?w RIOOMII Wra0l.aWSMI M.IN:MMYp10 gat lM 0law nNU u[..s mea n aro. pat w.q ma ?eriiail 9nm rci v'? ? j ¢ r?i O ..l y 4. r a ° a ? c= „ O ? / . °( ¦ / ` $ } . ? l[sr aaC?? ? w csr? ?? p? w xMas°x xeL.R xp wx ? ? 3 II V + x „ q . I ( 7t _ J . a cn.a 0 ? l?I m M Q a V I m W ; .M° .9:x O - ' 1 r.e.»s [ 1 , M (aI weeq o VaMI wlrae m.a (mnlnwurl y[ i ? -? CJ7 1 f?l f?7 1 1 I I I e--?-a x r § „ ° I / ?! e { p , ?? r. ? N.. Nowr w'_W n. pD:: roalr W4 rt Mwwsa wtKe . swm w[v wus) U { J LI m / ' x „ „ . „ = ? ' a{ ?x • : n e Z © ./ / Ox $ r a a 4 . a ?.°°a ppyy \\ x r«rt0.,\ ?I i m ( ? r. 1_ [ want w: {I III F^ s I a. i , ` tW-e FL xc rex n a ert ro 900 o vp n s.uvnoxom Irnt ra o9uaE owvsrtn waowc ra arrKras 0.Wnrn°MWG rWnmtT .NFMNCM°rE°?.1J.aXx 9(°IS ran) ..? 2 9 /f Y k r.w „- r° I I / l f(, l rosWl®kD rvs ?xwr Wlc x0 arlN w19 :frnh9 °i ?r-ou$. l J x I \ x . t ' I ' I I ' I I , .Fa w °x. Z D: a. ` ` r * f 6.' i w. uxuse9 nrxwsr a nDl°,EA «ao ?..®.rx Wxn ` socwx, u° l Jsne ro u.rol exsnle cwwnws d Srru. I''J W \ I / /// 1 \m / „ °O'x ° \ x „ v ? 9 .: =1 ?-i ?I M ar W:c s ?J I--' }- yNg ® / ? , T9s rlwrtlrrr W .rNw Rnc9 iaa Yc 0.. Is), K ax>, • . (art so[ W?iP Na 12?0.1WIb°. • •s nFWCIID M rd. ROm «4M.x4 n.rF ?. L/ Q 3 4 (n x. T w\ MT??e/. / a» / / x ra xa x x x x „ i ~ '' I ? r r' --1 ?e rre-sv p ? ? ? ` , . cAwaNUtsa[ .W r.rnKa vu c Wgarrtn ?. 9u .c Iron^er+na:vtr.ur aoc eca a vrt ulw°.m a aau • rcruro s, so[v.ua .xo so[wix aumn .o wr.r ro a .our or rNe vaaecr sNxu e[ ? J I 'T W ? U A. C m x a A' ! .« arr m aurmam oaxleKr srtmullws 9esslm ? srluclso m:molr xau P9A wnlnlc rc .a. ItMnn.nD Does anr a[a W.) x 4 x I x 1 I II x x * „ xx ..°wn o tmir - . r ?• . T .O k wrt ?a I ' •? : ` . s nom °csku. 0cs wn W. uarsMas sons eP wn-y vam x x I 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ $ ""4t"a°`.:vm Q s aTr ann. sye. to tam ate) ?: I / - n,.°,.. ? ? ?s n s: vr. rn.r r®I¢ axeo>? ®ea¢ ° x _ x _ _ _ x - ---_-- r - r i R _ _ I e l , ? Im.,o ?r II j / ,,; V , tmN. arz usn nlsv.n sloe K) allsv.nscw Kl x/. rwro-ur arasl r R4.cf auaso 9•(aW KI N,. :aeon x +nso..n x/. a a.a. eoolmtrs 2x2e s tars ex° ./. eRt°.° 9 -_- - I _ ------- - „ I ? ; ? 1 s+xm s mn TK7 6.o 1'X -- I r.« mm / I i x ' L eocv.xMWP«m xu sxa v aa.mm s ^ . L r mraa.rmNOUS .[. loa?s•I.s(an lsr lnmae s(an lA) /. x x__________ _ _ _ _ ________- _ ?. ?I 93 lv .waxer na.a?.. ? ? 1 °'ao ? o o- - ? F nwr<v ? A I ? . I a e..oaxxeml wmcrwa - m 1a2. urrsl. . . r?°9? ` . . - - . .w .tl:,W.m r.«. m.a " _- +? € A ? wr 1 _ ns vm re u n ICm i oeoy?° '3> s+a? mrx. "IIA ??.orsrtrorai o cni i ? -? . \ ? _ \ m nrr« 4mNNO mnu ?: Smr.l \ ? _ ?? 4 . f ` sZ59.t45 MM. x w.smca wn tool Iae ach a1rlAl ? ..,?„ \ warm 1r $ t + 1 1- n. u.rs rn. mc,°?ver"r°4 a ,,.. a ?aa x°?M::alra ro ® 4 ? al 1 l rs eua n Ws: a?i orme w'a'i mau?mnw ea°.o°?m ?reimc uwmr'41uxc? v.wrm. m _ - _ $ . . , «aT Kna?? .,~ A? aT, n. aa.e..rt9g r_ - ? '1__ ` t II ? _ ?a? rn v, „ , aWaNCnrs wo arum.wn 30. ae nNaa ?woewl?ve:zns?msrue ar< rl.a ro Iswua a ewmto to.ers qqgggg R 1 ?? / I __ -I. '. - _ - • \ / CMSteF 9taWrr fFr. ?m l%zzLLLsLiQRAm .rmvxA Art «e?I an"s"' ° a •`.cl xI @ 6 I I 1 [r - ?..I m99a '? , ) ? ?. „ • [ .. ? -. ? veorozo rtwr a v.r. xm A ap s.4AV°IF.M. n°Kr r[Q .S naC noel m nlJUla O ..wx:.F.ert d ? I 1 ? ? • ? ??• ? - ? l t«K Ola. IrxMflp norms w19r. mrt.at ani xNA1 .r R2 su.N. m [.eM.rt ? -__ - ---_- --- ? + ? wo / ? .eNES SiHEET .orxs0.i°x ?w?ioo''M°x°.1 w nru?l'?„ ?r? xwr°°ligirn. r ??r. ¢.??s. m __ _ <:I n,+ m µ -Ara = i°. u?u z r-, t r•? ; w in.[ i .+ectl?r_'4 Ix44am? 4KET TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATE CAR TURNING TEMPLATE 4 OF 9 ISSUE DATE: 1020.05 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 20, 2005, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and, a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along South Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior' landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470, & 1480 S Missouri Ave, , A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 2. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) Patrick E & Toni V Hickey are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width of 100 ft to 64.08 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 1-ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south) setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1-ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec 16-29-16, M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 07077 3. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) Lenny Cristino is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion of a restaurant with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 96 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing outdoor seating deck), from 25 ft to 22 ft (to canopy), and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 14.3 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a reduction of parking spaces from 43 spaces to 9 spaces, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.M, and a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 9 ft (along S Ft Harrison Ave), and a reduction to the rear (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Restaurant) at 1101 S Ft Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park Blk 39, Lot 1, parts of Lot 2 & Vac Lotus Path Adj on N. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06053 4. (Cont'd from 11-15-05) Peter Pan Developments LLC (Panayiotis Vasiloudes, Petrit Meroli, Somerset Condominium) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 15,000 sq ft to 13,087 sq ft, reductions to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 120 ft along Bay Esplanade and from 150 ft to 110 ft along Somerset St, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 22 ft (to water feature), reductions to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 11 ft (to building and pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 46.83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Bay Esplanade from 5 ft to 3 ft (for the retention pond planting area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset St from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)] at 693- 699 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 76 & unplatted Blk 76. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08090 5. Clearwater Townhomes Inc (Roland Rogers) are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit the addition of a pool to a previously approved attached dwelling project (FLD2002-11042, approved January 21, 2003) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval revising the previously recorded plat to provide for the proposed pool (PLT2005-00026). (Proposed Use: Addition of pool to twnhomes) at 161 Brightwater Dr, Island Townhomes, Lots 1-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09095/PLT2005-00026 6. Carlouel Yacht Corp. is requesting Flexible Development approval for the expansion of an existing commercial dock (10' x 107' floating dock addition to an existing 10' x 250' floating dock for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 226.13 ft to 3.3 ft, under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing commercial dock) • • at 1091 Eldorado Ave, Mandalay Replat Blk 171, Lots 6-11 & part of Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09094 7. Miriam L Cebula, & Harley P and Sharon R Evans (GFB Development, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 27 attached dwelling units in the High Density Residential (HDR) District with an increase to ht from 30 ft to 79 ft (to roof deck) with an increase to the ht of the parapet from 30 inches to 90 inches (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 21 ft (to building) and 12 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to building) and 8 ft (to pavement) as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-504.F. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 125 & 143 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07062 8. Georgia Street Properties LLC, 302-308 N Osceola Properties LLC. Belvedere Land Trust, Church of Scientology Flag Svc Org Inc, Osceola-Jones Properties LLC, & Triangle S A Land LLC (Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC, Triangle Development Company LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development (324 attached dwelling units and 26,124 sq ft of non-residential floor area), an increase in the permitted ht from 30 ft to 169 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 28 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck) for that portion of the development on the west side of N Osceola Ave, an additional 21 ft (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for that portion of the development on the east side of N Osceola Ave as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use) at 302, 303, 304, 308 and 309 North Osceola Ave, 410 Jones St: and 410 N Ft Harrison Ave, A. B. & Jennie Cate's Sub Lots 1-7 & Vac Alley Betw & Bergen's Repl Blk A-B & Vac Alley, Lots 8-11 & Subm Land, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43- 03, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43.04, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43-05, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43-06, Clovis C Lutz Sub Tract A-B, Subm Land, & 10 Ft Strip of Land Adj N of Tract A, Belvedere Apts Co-op Apt 2 A, Jones'. Sub of Nicholson's Blk 2, part of Lots 1-2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, ' c Planner III. FLD2005-09098 ' 9. Flamingo Bay of Clearwater, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 27 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 2.27 ft (to sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck and boardwalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 45.67 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 5.5 ft for parapets (from roof deck) and with an additional 16 ft for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 803.C (retaining 5 existing boat docks for sole use by the property owners); and (2) the Transfer of Development Rights for 2 units from 28 Idlewild St and 2 units from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1403 (TDR2005-09027). [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (27 condominiums)] at 170, 174, 180, & 188 Brightwater Dr, Bayside Sub No.2, Lots 36-40. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09101/TDR2005-09027 10. LaBella Vista of Clearwater, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit 18 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 10.8 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk and dumpster staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to pavement and wall), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 7 ft (to pavement and wall), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck and boardwalk) and increases to building ht from 35 ft to 45.67 (to roof deck) • with an additional 5.5 ft for parapets (from roof deck) and with an additional 14.25 ft for a roof top pavilion (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat docks for sole use by the property owners); and (2) the Transfer of Development Rights for 3 units from 200 Brightwater Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1403 (TDR2005-09026). (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [18 condominiums]) at 193, 199, & 201 Brightwater Dr, Bayside Sub No. 2, Lots 24 & 25, and part of Lots 23 & 26. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 09102/TDR2005-09026 11. Shaul & Meir Levy Partnership (C/O L&L Wings Inc.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval (FLS2003-09046) for redevelopment of an existing retail sales establishment and includes a reduction to front (south along Marianne St) setback from 25 ft to 10.75 ft (to building) and a reduction to front (south along Marianne St) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to pavement), per Sec 2-803.K. (Proposed Use: Remodel of existing Retail Sales Store) at 400 Poinsettia Ave, Barbour-Morrow Sub, Blk A, Lots 29-33 Incl. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-09096 12. Parkdale, LLC (Maria Nikolova & Belleair Harbor, LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to construct a 2 unit attached dwelling building in the Tourist Marina Residential District and includes a minimum lot area reduction from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a minimum lot width reduction from 100 ft to 60 ft, the rear, waterfront (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), and the rear, waterfront (east) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 2 unit attached dwelling) at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park, 1" Add Replat, Blk C, Lot 5 & Submerged Land E to Channel. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-10105 13. Magnolia Park Realty & BKB Properties Inc. are requesting a (1) Flexible Development to permit a Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached dwellings in the Commercial and Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to 16.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office District from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.F and 2-1004.1), and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line in the Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision. (Proposed Use: Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached dwellings.) at 907 S Ft. Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park, Blk 33, Lots 4, & 7-8, and part of lots 5 & 6, and Sec 16-29- 15, M&B 44.01. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 07074/PLT2005-00027 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 12/04/05 a9D?? FLD2(q090 8 = 166 302-308 N OSCEOLA PROPERTIES L 714 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3822 ANDRUS, D THE HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT 206TR PO BOX 775 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0775 BARTON, DONNA L D'AREZZO, JAMES D 465 1 ST ST W STE # 300 SONOMA CA 95476 - 6600 BAYBAK, MICHAEL 4515 OCEAN VIEW BLVD # 305 LA CANADA CA 00030 - BELVEDERE LAND TRUST NO 2 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 BERLE, RONALD BERLE, PEGGY A 131 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2304 BILGUTAY, ILHAN M 510 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4126 BROWN, MAXINE S 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 708 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 BULLDOG DEVELOPMENT CO LLC 714 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3822 AITKEN, DEBORA K AITKEN, DAVID N 2814 AUTUMN LAKE DR KATY TX 77450 - 5700 ANDRUS, D THE PO BOX 775 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0775 BASKIN, HAMDEN H III 13577 FEATHER SOUND DR STE 550 CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 5527 BEAN, MARJORIE E 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 510 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 BELVEDERE LAND TRUST 519 CLEVELAND ST # 103 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4009 BERNSTEIN, BRADFORD N BEACH, HAROLD 2441 HONOLULU AVE # 120 MONTROSE CA 91020 - 2507 BOLGER, ELEANOR H 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 811 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3915 BRUWER, GRAHAM BRUWER, LYNDA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 BURDETTE, HARRY M JR 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 /f - -7- IOANDRUS, BRIAN L ANDRUS, DONNA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH-E CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3933 AUSTIN, LLOYD B THE AUSTIN, THELMA L THE 5840 SINGLE FOOT CT SPARKS NV 89436 - 7062 BASKIN, HAMDEN H III BASKIN, ROBYN T 13577 FEATHER SOUND DR STE 550 CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 5527 BELVEDERE APTS OF CLW INC 300 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3946 BEND, JOSEPH P THE BEND, AGNES L THE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 BETES, GONZALO 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 2-B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3916 BROWN, ARNOLD PROPERTIES 17757 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 275 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6592 BULGER, LORRAINE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH E CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3933 BURNISON, JACK 409 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3904 BURNISON, JACK BUSWEILER, JOHN T BYRNES, LAWRENCE F BURNISON, PENNY E BUSWEILER, CATHERINE E 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 605 409 N FORT HARRISON AVE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3904 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3938 CARMEL, MORDEHAY 4220 MESA VISTA DR LA CANADA CA 00030 - CHAMBERS, DIANNE B CHAMBERS, JAMES D 820 EL DORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN R 305 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3923 CLEARWATER-GARDEN TOWER OPERAT 330 GARFIELD ST SANTA FE NM 87501 - 2640 COBB, DONALD D COBB, SUSAN M 511 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3944 COTA, JEFFERY D COTA, PATRICIA L 3410 HARGER CT SACRAMENTO CA 95821 CARTER, ROBERT E CARTER, JUDITH M 5521 EL ENCANTO DR SANTA ROSA CA 95409 - 4308 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 •CATANZARO, GEORGE J CATANZARO, SHERRA M 540 JONES ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4150 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 CLEARWATER INV INC Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition 13577 FEATHER SOUND DR STE 550 Doug Williams CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 5527 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 COALE, JOHN P VANSUSTEREN, GRETA C 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH C CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3932 COATES, THOMAS COATES, MARLENE 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 4B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3918 COOMBS, PHYLLIS M 603 7TH ST LIVERPOOL NY 13088 - 4426 CULLODEN, CHARLES A THE CULLODEN, SALLY B THE 2000 BEL AIRE DR -3717 GLENDALE CA 91201 - 1127 D L K PROPERTY TRUST 413 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 DOBIN, BART DOBIN, EMMA 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6 C CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3919 ECCLES, CHET R III ECCLES, INGRID L PO BOX 490 APPLEGATE CA 95703 - 0490 DARE, LOUIS DARE,SUSAN 9630 LA TUNA CANYON RD SUN VALLEY CA 91352 - 2232 DORNBUSCH, HARRIETTE KENDLER 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 ECHEVERRIA, MILDRED 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6-A CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917 CORBETT, ERNEST CORBETT, GAYE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 802 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 CUNNINGHAM, SHERRI L RAMP, LENIN 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 408 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 DAVIS, EDWARD A DAVIS, PEGGY J 1206 HONAN DR SOUTH BEND IN 46614 - 2172 DORSETT, KENDALL L DORSETT, ELLEN 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 107 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 ECKSTEIN, UDO KROSCHSTR 38 RODINGEN 52445 00004 - GERMANY ERIKSEN, VIVIAN S FARHAT, MARY K THE FISCHLER, IDO ERIKSEN, ROCHELLE K FISCHLER, DAPHNA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 103 PO BOX 847 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 208 MONTE VISTA CO 81144 - 0847 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 FORD, SANDRA GAIMAN, SHEILA GANGELHOFF, DAVID J 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 303 PO BOX 10550 405 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 GLENDALE CA 91209 - 3550 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3904 GARDNER, JOSEPH EST GEORGIA STREET PROPERTIES LLC GIBSON, ROBERT W GENEVIEVE GIBSON 401 N GARDEN AVE # 4 714 N FORT HARRISON AVE , 7610 SMETANA LN #309 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4174 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3822 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 - 4753 GLEASON, FRANK R GRAVES ROBERT M HAGAN, JILL GLEASON, SUSANNE W , 244 HARTNELL PL 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # PHG 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 406 SACRAMENTO CA 95825 - 6612 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3947 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 HALEVY, BINIAMIN HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT HARRISON-JONES PROPERTIES LLC HALEVY, SARA CONDO 133 CANDY LN 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 209 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5471 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3947 HARTELL, JAMES H HEINEY MICHAEL HELLER, HUBERT A HARTELL, EDITH P , 411 CLEVELAND ST # 133 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 2 C 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3916 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 HENRY, PATRICK D HOLMES, WILLIE B IMMERSITE NETWORK INC 321 N FORT HARRISON AVE 505 N GARDEN AVE 504 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3910 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4127 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 JAMES, MILTON C JAMESCHRIS CORP JENSEN, CRAIG C THE JAMES, ROSE 431 GULFVIEW BLVD JENSEN, SALLY R THE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 4245 MESA VISTA DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 LA CANADA CA 00030 - JOHNSON, THOMAS EDWARD JONES, PENNY A KENNEDY, WALTRAUT M JOHNSON, GINA 500 N OSCEOLA # 606 736 ISLAND WAY # 202 2694 HARVEST DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1817 CONYERS GA 30013 - 2408 KING, MICHAEL KRECKEL, PATRICK F KEYSTONE INVESTMENTS KING, TIMOTHY J KRECKEL, ELINOR M 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6 B 124 PLACER DR 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917 SANTA BARBARA CA 93117 - 1314 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 MARIA D KUNHARDT KWALL, LOUIS LEIBOLD, FRANK , 11050 STRATHMORE DR #312 KWALL, JEAN H 133 N FORT HARRISON AVE 603 N OSCEOLA AVE LOS ANGELES CA 90024 - 1609 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4020 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3839 LEONHARDT, GUNTER LEONHARDT, MELINDA C 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 403 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 MADERO,ESPERANZA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 MANECCHIA, VICTOR 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3938 MERWIN, GAIUS W III MERWIN, EUGENIA 75 MOUNT TOM RD NEW ROCHELLE NY 10805 - 1216 MINKOFF HOLDINGS LTD 403 EDGEWOOD AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5706 • LEWIS, W A INC 2617 W GRAND BLVD DETROIT MI 48208 - 1234 MADERO,ESPERANZA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 511 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 MARION, CARISA 32485 THE OLD RD CASTAIC CA 91384 - 3054 MESCHOULAM, SAMUEL MESCHOULAM, CLARISSE PALMA CRIOLLA # 4 301 BOSQUES DE PALMAS HUIXQILUCAN 00002- MEXICO MORSE, DAVID G THE MORSE, CAROL L THE 11450 RUGGIERO AVE LAKE VIEW TERRACE CA 91342 - 6735 MOUNT OLIVE AFRICAN METHODIST NIERENGARTEN, WARREN B 600 JONES ST NIERENGARTEN, JANICE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4136 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3934 OKUBOYE, JULIUS A O'LEARY, KIERAN 600 N OSCEOLA AVE O'LEARY, DONNA CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3838 PO BOX 170699 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94117 - 0699 ORTSCHEID, ROBERT A ORTSCHEID, JUDITH A 1092 ANDREWS ST TUSTIN CA 92780 - 4659 PACE TECH PROPERTIES INC 2035 PHILIPPE PKWY SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2200 OSCEOLA-JONES PROPERTIES LLC 133 CANDY LN PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5471 PEENS, LOUIS 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917 • LOIZOS, ANASTASIA MERWIN, EUGENIA 75 MOUNT TOM RD NEW ROCHELLE NY 10805 - 1216 MADERO, MARIA R GONZALEZ, LIDIA M 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 809 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3915 MEHLER, HORST 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 411 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 METHVEN, ALLEN METHVEN, JILL 120 SW 7TH ST DUNDEE OR 97115 - 9535 MORSHEAD, JOHN W C C BOX 99-071 JOHANNESBURG 2000 00000 - SOUTH AFRICA North Myrtle Avenue Association Tom Selhorst 1010 Blanche B Littlejohn Trail Clearwater, FL 33755 OLT, PETER 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 1 C CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917 OSTERTAG, MARTIN 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 PEREIRA, JOE X 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 PICCONE, ISELLA PERNA, LARRY F PICCONE, PATRIZIA POMAHAC, ROBERT R 6600 BERMUDA RD # A 5571 MARGARET AVE LAS VEGAS NV 89119 - 3604 601 N OSCEOLA AVE CULVER CITY CA 90230 - 6251 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3839 POWLEY, CHARLES N POWLEY, VIRGINIA J 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 509 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 RITCHIE, THOMAS 99-1115A Al EA HEIGHTS AVE AIEA HI 96701 - ROSS, COURTNEY D JOVANOVIC, DUBRAVKA 604 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3838 • QUANN, MARK ADAMS, REBECCA E 131 N SAN MARINO AVE PASADENA CA 91107 - 3537 ROCKL, RAYMOND G ROCKL, HILARIE J 2020 E KENT AVE # 411 VANCOUVER BC V5P 4X1 00030 - CANADA RYBACK, DANIEL RYBACK, DORIS A 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3934 SALINAS, MARY THE SALVATION ARMY CHURCH SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS PO BOX 8070 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8070 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 SAWTELLE, GREG F THE SAWTELLE, KAREN R THE 957 VERDUGO CIRCLE DR GLENDALE CA 91206 - 1535 SCHNEIDERGRUBER, MANUELA CHESTERWELL INV LTD 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 5 C CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917 SERENITY NOW PROPERTIES INC 398 LAUREL LN PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5476 SHALLIMAR REALTY INVESTMENT IN 413 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 SIMPSON, WILLIAM J SIMPSON, KAREN P 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 805 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 STAHL, TATJANA AMEISENBERGSTR 41 D-70188 STUTTGART 00004 - GERMANY SETTLE, BRUCE J SETTLE, ELIZABETH J 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 SHERMAN, MARTIN J SHERMAN, RHONDA RENEE 3109 CARTER AVE MARINA DEL REY CA 90292 - 5508 SONDERMANN, WILFRIED & HELGARD 52 ACACIA ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1405 STRIJEWSKI, HERMANN 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 • REICHARD, SHERWOOD MARSHALL 2306 GREENGATE DR AUGUSTA GA 30907 - 3558 ROESCH, HANS K ROESCH, MARIA T 48 CASTLEDENE CIR AGINCOURT ON M1T 1S1 00030 - CANADA SALAM, JAMI AL INC DBA ALBANIA 225 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4022 SAWTELLE, GREG THE SAWTELLE, KAREN THE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 805 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 SEEFELD, PAMELA J 331 BELLEVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 2018 SHALLIMAR REALTY INV INC 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 1 B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3916 SIDORENKO, VLADIMIR SIDORENKO, YULIA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 505 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3938 SOUKHAREV,ANDREI SOUKHAREV, SILVIA 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 4 A CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3918 Thomas Coates, Triangle Development Company, LLC. 305 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 THRESHOLD CONSULTING SERV TUBBESING, HORST URIZARBARRENA, MIKEL INC GERLACH-TUBBESING, K FRIAS, BERTA 200 N GARDEN AVE STE B 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 204 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 601 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4187 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3934 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 WADDELL, DAVID E • WEIR, IONE R WEIR TIMOTHY J WADDELL, GWEN S WEIR, J MICHAEL 7328 SPARHAWK RD 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 709 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 611 WAKE FOREST NC 27587 - 5493 GLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3940 WHEATON, MARJORIE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 WONG, PATRICK Y WONG, LINDA 10 SOUTHDOWN CT HILLSBOROUGH CA 94010 - WHITEHURST, LEON JR BASKIN, HAMDEN H III AFD 720 SNUG ISLAND CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1831 WOODRUFF, JOHN W WOODRUFF, CLAIRE B 19291 SLEEPING OAK DR 7242 TRABUCO CANYON CA 92679 - 1031 ZAUN, HELGA BREITLING, SANDY 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 ZIMMER, MICHAEL S C/O J W ROBINSON PO BOX 2692 CLEARWATER FL 33757 WILLNER, NEIL A THE WILLNER, EVE K THE 1928 RIMCREST DR GLENDALE CA 91207 - 1044 YOCKENFLOSTER OF CLEARWATER 1670 SPARKLING CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2303 ZIMMER, MICHAEL S ZIMMER, C MARGENE 655 PARK CIR -2692 ELM GROVE WI 53122 - 2556 ZIMMER, MICHAEL S ZIMMER, CHERYL M 555 PARK CIR ELM GROVE WI 53122 - 2553 _ : i Y ~ ~ y o ~ j 0 0 o ~ ii~ ~ I ~ ~~~4 1 ~ ~ a~•- Y . w ~~a~~c ~ ~ ~ ~s~~~0 ~ N ~ ~ ~ ai Q f=n v a O U i N i ~ O 0 O U Q O C ~ ~ O 7. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O U U U ~ ~ ~ N i- lA O ~ ~ (>T ~ s=~~L- - d? N N 3•- O OL ~ O O O ' -p ~ O U q) C O Q O ~ O ~ O.O LS y _ ~ Q,1 ~ U C g~g' P~I~ ~PPROV~D o ~ rv SBl U N ~ C rI`'1JE 7t' oRO°IS ~ O ~ ~ g 1. O U _ ~ to CASE TYPE /'...o tuctu. ~ v u~~ Q- DRCDATE -~~_~O ~z~os oom~,U CDB DATE u ~ ~ ,r RE ~ a o SI~NATU ~ ~ ~ . was moa~~ RATE - Q ~ ~ ~ o N b ~l ~~~JL.JL ~~o JL Jld ~1~J1~1~~~~ IS~S~ ~.l~ ~~~~Jl~d 11 ~ DEVELOPER PLUMBINC3 ENGINEER L N O ~ U ~ .~~1 N N I W L 2 aP 2 ~ U N Q ~ .s= z m ~ O N a N' i G.O~ ~(1) I t0 ~ ~ O C N fA ~ N +r fj fl. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t` "_s: ems. ~ 3 S'' ` O ~ N O- t2 ~ e ~ r N U ~ ~ ~ fly. -g.. s I N -`6 N~~ L .C Uy i N O I'- fll fa vy 4- SHEET ~ DESCRIPTION MBER NU i TY2TGLE DEVELOPNIEI~IT COIVSI'AI~', LLC ~CgA1~dICAL EIeTGI1~EE1tII~TG SOLiJTI~1~TS, Il\TC. 305 N. fORT HARRISON 5417 BEAUMONT CENTER 80ULEVARD, SUITE b75 ......COVER SHEET CS CLEARWATER, FLORJDA 33755 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33&34 (727) 446-OQ2Q (813) 885-4600 LSi MASTER STREETSCAPE PLAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS :MECHANICAL ENGINEER ASO i PR0 ECT MASTER PLAN ~ hf~ TREETSCAPEI':OETAILS ASOIi S CONSTRUCTION ~TAG~MEAIT & DEV. - FL03tIDA, LLC MECHP~I~TiCAL E1~TGIIdEEI~G SOI,UTIOI~T~, Il~T~. 500 N. FORT HARR(SON 541 I HEAUMONT CENTER BQULEVARD, SUITE 675 ' , TER PLAN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33634 A t 00 } sr FLOOR MAS (727) 462-0014 (813) 885-9600 f.L00R MASTER .PLAN m Ai.Oi . 2nd m~ A i 02 3rd FLOOR MASTER PLAN N W ARCHITECTS: ELECTRICe4L ENGINEER ISLAN FLOOR MASTER PLAN Ai03 4th mLL A 104 5rh FLOOR MASTER P GDA & BDG JOINT VENTURE ~~~~~~~~~aca~T~~,~c. MASTER PLAN FLOOR W ' A 105 6rh ~ ,n 3 ~'sI2AH1~M DE~I~r1~I A.~.~'OCIATE~ P.A. 3702 AZEELE STREET MASTER PLAN ~ ~ _m • B~DR~OMS Ai06 7th FLOOR z 585 MAIN STREET, SUITE 20t TAMPA, F~ox~~r~ 33609 FLOOR ~a• $~DRDO Q NU TOTAL h FLOOR M;aSTER PLAN ~ F( A l07 8t W DUNEDIN, FtORlDA34698 (727) (s13) 876-745 .LEVEL RETAIL SQ/ 9rh FLOOR M,4STER PLAN ~ o UNITS A14s BR ~ Z ~ 3 BR ~ ER PLAN a ~3s-9aoo LANDSCAPE CONSULTANT t BR 2 BR 3 BR A I09 i 0th-FLOOR ~„AST ,n f~ I v CM M BDG AtBCHITECTS 1}jJ~,AP ASSOCIATES A 1 i 0 11 rh FLOOR MASTER PLAN ~ . 0• _ 26T 1 SEVILLE BOULEVARD, SUITE 8 - I I I 12th Ft00R MASTER PLAN H N 4 Q 13 A Q W t. N W CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33764 (727) 2744 SUMMERDALE DRIVE NORTH, SUITE 207 1ST 4 5 4 A 112 14rh FLOOR MASTER PL4N ~ Q 584-9516 CLEARWATER, FLQR?DA 34627 _ A 113 15th FLOOR I+.9ASTER PLAN a l6 C~ ~ (72'7) 796-6593 2ND 4 $ 4 4 0 , A 114 PENTHOUSE ~.~VEL MASTER PLAN - CIVIL ENGINEER ~ A 1 15 .ISLAND VIEW - UNlT FLOOR PLANS _ ~ =Q r 1} ~ 20 A LAMS ~ N i A 1 i 6 !BLAND VIEW U. AT FLOOR P a y - ~i'~x ~~yac ~ ~sst~c~'~~s, ~~c. INTERIOR DESIGN CONStlLT~?NT 3RD 4 12 ~ HARRi ON VILLAGE -MASTER PLANS I~ V~ AI17 S 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD, SUITE 404 PAMELA TEMPT.~~ TDE~YGl@T CsROLTP _ ~ M OR PLANS ~ a 4 0 2~ A i i HARRISON VILLAGE - UNIT FLO 8 CLE4RWATER, FlORFDA 33759 5541 GULF BdULEVftRD, SUfTE 1 i t 4TH 6 ~ 4 Y, (727) 793-9888 ST. PETE BEACH, FLORIDA 33706 (727} = LL 2 - A200 ISLAND ~'E~'' : CAST ELEVATION ~ 4 0 Q LA1VD SURVEY CONSULTANT 3e'-3'~3 STii 5 to 4 A201 ISLAND :lEW .~OU~HELEVATION ~~-~.A' - A2d2 ISLAND VIEW - aJEST EL , 4 a Za POLARIS ASSOCIATES, nvc. ACOIi~`~0 ~ ~4L CONSULTANT 6~~ 6 r 4 ' 4 A203 ISLAND VireJ` - "FORTH ELEVATION - 2915 S.R. 590, SUITE 17 SIE~EIl~T ASSOCIr1TES, Y1~7C. - - - ARRISON' VILL,'~GE -ELEVATIONS i~Copydght-~ral~r,Ues~nTassoaales;PA A204 H ~ - - ~ ~ Nirighisfesetved. 29 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 625 NW 60TH STR€ET, ~ SUITE C /STN b ~ $ 5 j Tfds material is the exdusm!e property ! of (wham llesign Assotiates• PA (727) 669-0522 GAlNESVILLE, FLOR C~ 32&07 Eiepca~J#tetim in fuF!alee[ inpanc~~ _ stdctlyprohbitedwitlauttl!epdorwritten 5 Q 2 ~ permission of (wham Design Assodales, ' ~ PA and any such reproduction may PARKING/TRAFFIC CONSULTANT ~3sz~ s3i-s>>> - 8TH 6 t 8 5 subjedyeu to cavil anNorcriminal lia6iGty under Title ~17 of tha United States t~,de. GULF~OASTCOI~TSULTIPaTG,II~TC. W~~OR ~ii~ & MOLD CONSULTANT 0 22 - 4 13825 lGOT BOULEVARD, 5luTE 605 A QUAI.ITj' $~'~~~R EI~TVIR~IyIENTP~L, LLC. 9TH 12 6 4 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33760 (727) 751 CAP_T(VA CO!/R7" N.E. ST. 1 OTH 1 2 6 4 22 i 4 0 (727) 524-181$ PETERSBURG, FlORlDA 33702 (727) 527-0304 1 - 4 2 6 GARAGE CQNSULTANT 11TH 4 6 4 ~~BQ~~P~~~~~~ S1AlIMMIIVG POOL CONSULTANT 12812 N. 60th STREE( STiJ I.AI~T~ A1~I~ ASSOCIATES 1 2TH 4 6 4 4 2 16 - Q 0 CL64RGYRTER, FCORID/t 33780 2$ SANDPIPER ROAD _ ~ 4 2 16 (727J 539-7U5 TAMPA, FLORIDA 34677 14TH 4 f) 4 ($73) 287-2949 tr W 4 2 i6 F ENVIROMENTAL CONSULTANT LIFE SAFETY CONSULTANT ~ 5TH 4 6 4 Q ~ ~3ELTA-SEVET~I MICHtk~L C. MITCHELL PENTHOUSE 0 4 4 2 l0 - ~ Q 4 w 447 3rd AVENUE N., SU17E 206 40 BOURNE CIRCLE s~ ST.~ETER58URG, FLORIDA 33701 PALM HARBOR, FLORIDA 34683 a (727) 823-2443 (727) 785-9856 TOTAL$ 82 ` 131 62 285 _ . 1 62 10 0 w U WATERPROOF(NG~ONSULTANT FQUNTAW CONSULTANT ~ . Z C.B. ~C3LDS1~13T~-I ~dZC~IITEC~S - 0 ~I _ ~ ~ tF? . ~ r, { s, t......_.. _ 73003 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 N. Yr`k y. .r s,~#, .,,.~.E~~afl~dE~t~.~a e_E1..._...~._._.._.....~ :i Wray CLEARWATER, FLORlQA3376~ k ! ff (727) 536-0456 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER i ~ ~ ..v ~ jr ~ ` 5~ ~a~.~t r~rt 0 ~s a~ c~aL.~rn~~rc. : ~ c~' 4 ~w' ~ t 1~ i . 1~~~p , 5ui t' ~g r~ti~•P~E~` ~ i't` W ~..rw w ~ • ~ ~ r a. ? ~ ~..,.i.<<~4. „..'s_ ;'WCA- e ~ : r ~--•q i ~ : E[F ~i r ,~.,~R`.,@i-~ x-.,~ i ~ tnvi rrcul w viL-Lc nu., ~ui r c e- vu Jrn SARASOTA, FLORIDA 34237 (941) HAKKIZA 7 WtiISUN VILLHtjt ~amtara Fats' I W 1.g. 952-1717 NO. '.''OF BEDROC F BEDROOMS t FLOOR TOTAL RETAIL SQ/FT r i 14I UNITS LEVEL 1 -BR 2 BR 3 BF R 3 BR 4 BR PROJECT i u, F t _ s !i -I r LOCATION 1ST 0 ;0 d 0 0 0 26,124 SQ. FT. N ~1 o f f i ~H l 1~! _ GddJ3!6{ E ?1 is JR, 20 2ND 8 !4 8 fl t. ~saA 1, HendtiblitlSf -An GREGG HOLr}SWORTH LICENSE NO. AR 3Rd 7 ,4 8 a 1g g ;~4~Ila'~PI~~1~C„;- ~'$R r...~:~.. : r3--.-.,~.~-:•., , 0017669 €.sr TOTALS 15 , 8 16 16 3 " i ' 24 S Q. FT. - ~I L„ 261 J ( 1. f f3rlkb#rr 6 1 F# ~ ~ ~ ~ F 1 non r 0200 N,+~TE THOMAS J. GRAHAM X55 Y_ LICENSE NO. AA ORIGI t C-000752 ~ NORTH 1 LOCATION MAP IT% 05-42 RECEIVE'lls' N.T.S. 8 ?Q~5 NOV 0 ENT ppggR DATE DRAWN CH111 fl?G Caly Or to 11!8(05 MAWIJDS TJG J t G,;. 9u. o ~4 j _ ~ a~ ~ r~' , ~ I I - ,-I r ~~~m.' , v.. . r: r ; r i i', ' s~o urn ~ ~ t ~-=-r- a., ~ SIZE REMARKS ~ ~ m = _ i s~. ,__.r ,~.I _ inn ~y~ r srn I I ` STAI~EJ~D AREA ~M ~i7 ~ BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME / ; ~ KEY QUANTITY/5PACING ~ ~ ~ ~ dq I - ~ a ti ~ rte- aY.;.W L v !r „i ~ ~ 5OD COVERING L1 +r , ~ G~iASS r~ _ E~ ry ` + ~ ~ n~ ~„r•':, LOADING oAOCd& _ 1 t ~ ' r : I' s f' 32 ~6 1 `Y k9 ~ s f 7 ° ny , F F'fl - t LP r ° r 1 PrWR6ff~~ 'e!AN~:. s to ~ 67 i = EES: Ei'= TR ~ o ° L v i ~ i 't~gc - M, i OJT r+r 1S f2P~D ~ •1 - € W~ t, , ' l - ~ I a . Hli+w' f'F` V3 d f tl F ; ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~s~ ~ , u ~ 1 t~,~sevr.,~ ,i' ~ ,,may . f ~ - - _ a - ~q~n~~~r~ ~ LI E OAK 14'-16' OAH, 7' SP, 6"CAL, 100 GALLON ~ o ~ 'o ~ = ~ QV1 12 QUERCUS VIRGINIANA V - . F " - , r l i":3 € r~ ~•,t I ~ !E{, ~ €.E Y` . LE E<I :7~~h~ i i' ~ 1: 5 1j - ~ : ' ~ co as LIVE OAK 10 -12 OAH, 6 SP, 21/2 CAL, 65 GALLON - ° ' QV2 24 QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ''M._... Y .'3. f T II i'l r~ e.. 1~ ` - ~ 10 -12 OAH, 5 -7 SP, 3 CAL, 1 QO GALLON ~ i FFNCE ~ .t. t II> ,c',i~ ,a ~f~P `y~ ~ .i r ~ € ~ , Y Yn ~ ~ ~ ~l~rf F r, ~ ~ a~{~~ .R'~ ~ y~~` ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i Ni - 6 MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA D.D. BLANCHARD ~ ~ ~ c es L ~ MGD 00 GALLON ' o a' ~ ~ 10 12 OAH, 5 -7 SP, 3 CAL, 1 ~ Il. - ' ~ 'a:7 . t , ~~rl,. ~ { f aF." ~ r27 i e • _ L ; i T T ~ f 1 €~P K ~d a,_ I ' ° » ~ - ~ 4 ULMUS ALATA WINGED ELM a, ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ WE H 10'SP 45 65 GALLON ~ a' ~ a ~ _ LIGUSTRUM STANDARD 8 OA , / E ~ a~ LJT 10 LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM I, m ~ ~ . ~ i I _ I F ~ r, X i:i~k~~" .'d ~`-s:~'r-. , i, ~ r . is Sim Rl~A €,Sj „ _ +a..-,t ~~Z" i s ~ja' ~..I ` ,,a[ 5•~:,y;,`m +f.,~~'r-,• fF F. V'I" fi,~ ~-f + Ij IID ~ Lw ~ 'MEJOOL' 10 CLEAR TRUNK W. B&B h. _ ~ f r 7 PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA ~ m o ~ ti PDM 1 TRUNK W B&B ~ ~ _ " r ~ ~w y , 10 CLEAR '1 I d~ ~ aac; .'2 r: ~.~..aa I!i^f ~ '~~8 r a 1 ~ ~ - ° -~^~r •t• / '~i`.t I r3 a. ~asJi,' r,a ~ ~P~tl Sp 24 SABAL PLAMETTO CABBAGE PALM = o ¢ a ~ ~ 5 -6 OAH DOUBLE TRUNK , 45 GALLON o ~ - v, ti 1 ~ , ~-t a ~ r ~ \ , Iz1NC. 9.~8 TOR - . r • ^r, - ,,y ~ r"TV ®Tr~ ~ m...`€, a - - ,m, 7 ~ _S `,TEtANSFGRldERS / ~ ' .a _ _i; 1 ~ t._r 7`.~' PR2 5 PHOENIX ROEBELINII PYGMY DATE , , + "~aa'~ro - 5 6 OAH TRIPLE TRUNK , 45 GALLON E., ~ ~ _ a -c~~:r; ~ PYGMY DATE o u, ~ 3;,tt , ~ l•dT Fi~i~ a y~:',~. ~L G ig ~ ?'~9~; u<hi~rc~r PR3 3 PHOENIX ROEBELINII ~ I ~ r ~ =~,.r ~ c•r ~ 8'-10' FIELD GROWN ~ ~ > ~ ~ • 4~ 1 3~ d f 3 I ~ ~ 1 : FU ! I r .:;1 "1'~"`.. I - ~ i''. :54€ ~ A i rT { ' ~ ~ ~ Ap 22 ADONITIA MERRILLII CHRISTMAS PALM ' -GC~:,r`~'ta.<'w~ WASHINGTONIA PLAM 10 CLEAR TRUNK MINIMUM, VARY HEIGHT ~ _ ~ ~ . =pyc%e.~~~i~~ k WR 36 WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA ~ ~ ~ LEAR FIELD GROWN U - ~ RKIA NOBLIS BISMARKIA PALM 10 C 7 BISMA ~ _ ~ U PdNR~i { ,r 8 -10 FIELD GROWN I a . _ ~ ~ m.. ~ Fp 13 WODYEDTIA BIFURCATA FOXTAIL PALM ~ ~ c ~ o , ~~jy,. t ~ E' ~ r~'€ , r w"~ ~ 'm y~ ~.°yL f'~ ~ ~ i- ~ ~a~~ . aw ` ~r~ LAFRANCE HIBISCUS 8 -10 OAH, 5 SP, 30 GALLON o ~ ~ . _ ~ HL 9 HIBISCUS LAFRANCE 30 GALLON ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ kl I LL~h 1 'l I{~~ lr _ A ~ r ' - I ICA CRAPE MYRTLE 8 -10 OAH, 5 SP, ' :_ti;#` I`° 3 LAGESTROMIA ND - ~ _ LI • / ~ ~ ; moths . , r"'PIAliE ' CHINESE. FAN PALM 10 CLEAR TRUNK, W. B&B ~ ~ ~ a' ` 3 2 LIVISTONIA CHINENSIS t c ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ qq ai 64 i . i ~ R. ' i.9 € ~ J~ ~ A~ ,zs,W: ri~:.k.,~ . ~ g i i '~1 ~ ~i ~ K6 I j- r-'» • ~ ~J ~ ~ Ca eta ~ BIRD OF PARADISE 24 OAH, 18 SP., 3 GALLON - ~ gp 52 STRELITZIA RAGINA , " " f' ~s ~ ~ zs c~ ~ I~ 3 ~ r F' ~ i AP , l ' I ' ~ PTF ~ ~ ~i 17 R& ~ 'QUEEN EMMA LILY 30 OAH, 30 SP., 5 GALLON = m rz ~ 27 CRINUM AUGUSTUM " " bra o' as m " ~ ~''~-~~,r CL 30 OAH, 30 SP., 5 GALLON ~ _ ~ 2 CHAMAEROPS HUMILIS EUROPEAN FAN PALM " - _ ~ ~ ~ EF 18 -24 OAH, 15 SP., 3 GALLON ~ o ~ o j SANDANKWA VIBURNUM ~ s a ~ ~ '.r~~.: Cell <I uP~ ~ °r~ ~ r~~, VS 238 VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM - - 12"SP. 3 GALLON ~ ~ ~ ~ " _ - r.' ~ INDIAN HAWTHORN 10 12 OAH, ~ ~ ~ as = o L ;n RI 202 RHAPHEOLEPIS INDICA ^""I~w r "it, .Ri ~ lr , i 1 ~ .'I r-~ .y~~ iEi -i ~ 1_ - - 10"-12"OAH, 12"SP., 3 GALLON ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ 82 ILEX VOMITORIA ILEX SCHILLING5 , .'i, ~ 'I V...1 6 , ' r - 1 LOROPEDALUM 18 -24 OAH, 15 SP., 3 GALLON 305 LOROPEDALUM SPP. ~ _ , , , • Y _ it I a.~rx,~ a~s,~ ~ a ~ ~1P 1~'~E ~F, d I I = a t, LP 18"-24"OAH 15"SP., 3 GALLON ra 35 ILEX CORNUTA BURFORDI HOLLY . -~`+°G= IB 2 OAH, 3 SP., 3 5 GALLON ~ -car KING SAGO / '"'a " KS 10 CYCAS REVOLUTA " " i i E ,i~ ~ J z d Z - i I I , yv ~ ~ J ~ ~ 15 OAH, 15 SP., 3 GALLON XANADU • XP 38 PHILODENDRON XANADU i i4 a 24"OAH, 36"SP., 7 GALLON INIA ZERUMBET DWARF VARIGATED " p:, SGV 12 ALP 18 -24 OAH, 15 SP., 3 GALLON + ~ 3 I ~ - CUM LIGUSTRUM I ~ LJ 66 LIGUSTRUM JAPONI 18"-24"OAH 15"SP. 3 GALLON 'I-'- ~ rt~3 g 280 HIBISCUS R05A SINENSIS HIBISCUS ~ ~ H „ " ' ~ / rA'i° i ~,r . ,F ~ I ~i RIGHTED PITTOSPORUM 18 -24 OAH, 15 SP., 3 GALLON ,r, • ~ - p11/ 84 PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA VARIEGATUM VA " ~,a, ~Fu P~:~ ~ ~ CROTON 18 -24 OAH, 15 SP., 3 GALLON z,~ I I 13 / ~ - = 54 CODIEUM VARIEGATUM NN CD 'MAUI' IXORA 18 -24 OAH, 15 SP., 3 GALLON ~ i 9~5 - • IX 378 ILEX CORNUTA 5"5P. 3 GALLON say PLUMBEGO 18 -24 OAH, 1 , ~u .Y~r rt - ° :fY°) :p SIP 0 . l 5. .~~1 s~ - ' ' ~I PG 117 PLUMBEGO CAPENSIS 5"SP. 3 GALLON r•.-~ 1~Pr~r SILVERTHORN 18 -24 OAH, 1 l 'L I 1 ' -r; Ep 16 ELEAGNUS PUNGENS " " GALLON - ~ c"p' GHEE GRASS 18 -24 OAH, 15 SP., 3 AKAHAT F x. r"ra m ~ I / y f'-~'- d. S .Y , I i~ I / L p - ~ h` FG 84 TRIPSECUM DACTYLOIDES " m ~ '~.r iw~,: ' ~ ~~t - ' A' DWARF FAKAHATCHEE GRASS 15 OAH, 15 SP., 3 GALLON ~ , r I , x; '1. ~ . e'.' ,Fil" 5 ! Fem. ` 1 ' ~ I i ~ PSI ~Y~`, '4..r°'ti ~ e ape 1. ~ 84 TRIPSECUM DACTYLOIDES FLORIDAN = M FG w`` X319 .i AG 1 Q`d j ~ ~ ~ I ~ C ~ GROUND COVER F I p, ~ m _ ~ . r it ~ I ~ n 4T': 1 I r 4~ G9 ~ rsa~~2 % t LI '~i ! P,a 1J t 'JfJV,Y-~ {(~t ~~\~l~t ~ j~r f3~I$ • i :r - p$o p~ F..:..:.if I '3a -Li. ~ ~ e~ ~ i~ 10-12 OA, 8 SP, 1 GALLON _ . ~ wv I ASTEC GRASS 659 MUSCAR <<r' AG LIRIOPE " " F~ a}~~~ 6 ~ rn ~ d . ` 11 t LIE of 1e EVERGREEN GIANT LIRIOPE 10-12 OA, 8 SP, 1 GALLON ~ - ~ LE 260 LIRIOPE MU ARI " r:~~~ P ~ ~ LOpONG PAVER P='., ~a ~ is r , C~ wAY - I ~ el~ 1i 19 p ~ :",C7 • , _ . E 4 -6 OA, 8 SP, 1 GALLON ASIATIC JASMIN r rY~= ~ 338 HELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES " " ~ - Qa; c~ , c. AJ TRAC - 8 SP 1 GALLON w`~'+ ~ ~ C JASMINE TRICOLOR. 4 6 OA, : , r. 1. 1 INOIDES ASIATI ( ) A,~T 327 TRACHELOSPERMUM JASM , . M= ~ 4"-6"OA, 8" SP, 1 GALLON . : , ~r ' ,I > ~ L .ti ' _ ' 4iy 'I ~ ~ Pub! l ~T~ i t~` i3 1-J h: ~ ASIATIC JASMINE VARIEGATED) ~ ~ Q I . d - _ UM JASMINOIDES ( AJV 123 TRACHELOSPERM ~ r~>r~ ~ ~ y ~ a' i 8 l i ~ .~,_--RETENTN}N--~• i { ~ ~ ~ 1"= t W ~ ~ ( I 10-12 OA, 8 SP, 1 GALLON ~ ~ ~ ~ DAY LILY " ~ m ~ ~ : ' ~ro:~rN^~e. DL 451 HERMOCALLIS SPP. - SP 1 GALLON ~ ~ M rmn+ru~ 10 12 OA, 8 HDiE: ~E ~ t ~ ,r.:r ~.3 i~rl"~Ld.G eE,as i r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MI 6 ORIA IROIDES AFRICAN IRIS a0a€S~'A ~ 1i ~ ~ ~ ~ P , ' ~ ~ PARSONI JUNIPER 6-8 OA, 12~~ SP, 1 GALLON ~ w„~ ~ G, JPV 169 JUNIPERUS CONFERTA COMPACTA -8"0 12 SP 1 GALLON .9 N N ~ P°~~ a>~=~. ~ STER PLANT 6 A, I i ,t; -J ~z:. W ,x•~.; ~ A„ icy g~ RD 169 REO DISCOLOR . OY " + ~ ~ --c 6-8 OA, 12 SP, 1 GALLON , I / l~ ~ ~ a' KATIE PURPLE ~y ~I{:'., ~R~ k~i is c 235 UELLIA BRITONIANA COMPACTr, u ~ MP R ~ ~ - , g~., 1: , >L . , a. ; ~ - 's'' . ;e SOD ST. AUGU5TINE i . rP i J, T ~ 1. : 5i~f~ iVt I FiP ~ * ~ ~ ~ , . d ~1-5.~..~.~.....::JS. ..u:.w} Z JU ...4!'_..~ ...b.~ ,.'1 E _ - - :.G..{S_ati:t.«--. - _ _ k~.:: ID` CL ~ IR 1 * _ • ~ 50 Nn' , ~ t ,h ~ t~ I,? ~ I• ~ I ~ 4 ~'iD rv ,i ~ 3 - Il ....'1. i ~ ~ ' n s rhr k, f ~ ~ y~ ~w ~ 9.,-~.. ~ a~ '•TtU) ` 1 r' j ~ t , ~ ~ . sc»u Tern -a.~s.~ . J I e PG 1-.~ ~,~1 F ~i ~ { f'S do +'a~1 - ~n c ,h~ ~ - ll- -i 't ad. ~ ~ L•7T J %c' .~tvy'0. _ - -l_ °b,,~_i:.T'I ~'9- r ~ ~t$ k:81 ` • ~ :~.y r~ ~,2`..ti`~~ ~ ~f,' i~ •'~rt~i:f - _ •~I.:~ ly i ~ W~°trJ -~~,Z' iv'~$ ,It. ~I rfla ? 43 - ~ ~ F"t~ r _ ®G~yAyhi-Giaha~r Cesi~n Assactaies, PA i~ 'G- - ABn~htsra~rved 3i..,..lf - A' i ~!G i ~ , i. . : * ......".f l ~ La ~ .:i.•€ ~ ~ ~~.•i?• . -0` I F.•. , tR~ v4~ j ~ ~ f" ,.-1 y • 5.' ~ _ / ~ ~ rt. 1}•^, ~L fir' f('."^~^a~ A 1}ilsmaled~isiheezdosive 5 0.4n.. ~T• ' i F'' -T 'v -I`" : - 1 ' Pub°:: t E i ' h' i~''I+~' + ry~ -f• 1, ~ ~ ~ i }rP ~ _ I ~ alGrahamt)es~gnAssac~s,PA. 1 a ~ Gr`G ' i (1`PJ ~ l~ Repr~utlioahwf~leorinpartsls TI !.F?t ~Y: i6 .i r , •^~PS . e ~ ',i:F "•i f.}:**1 pt I: ~,~'.CX~E N~%~l %.r;. y ~ r,~R ~ai l t ~ p;,;, :"~~,"t <'~'`'r^. ,,,a.-.,.. r '.c's'>+... .r',.~".,.~~.:'' i'f':y:~Y, _ _ I a% ,irr~ f~ ~1 r i strioih/pidrbit.avt~,hdttthe~wiit'ar parmsslon of Graham Grs~° I - r~j'n' '.r Aa l l ~ 4 /:A ~C - - - ...a^~~`~„' ~;-.-~Mr ~~f ~I \u I b.'h~ J. - e 7 c _ - _ - ,'r t~ AAA .rT t'. .%a`.5 "`'Y I ' • - 1E,' f IY 9~ PA. asdao9sarh ropr^.~octiar may fY _ 1 p~l}routodvi,andraaiminal~ablipg 'd t ~a js~s ti a' -~'r~ r 9~ ~ ~ 'F4~: : ~ y'a, .5 ~ zFyh.;~.r+ j:"''~ 3u '",f ~ ` ~ ~C. ~.AB Ta2 I''--~.Ei'f~llz Fi a~ ~ .1 rC~. , ~ %h 's"' u; ~ i I TRAN~ORMERS ~r~a,: I E ' undb•T~e;7aE~hel;r~~151~sCt~~. y \ ~ ~ F~s» I. n e>3v~v~;~~~ ~ ~ s " ;i' "'°''G~if ~ U ~'~,r ~ • ire t g i ' f t^ . ~ "t ~ ~ ST IlrlfD AREA ~ • • ' :i • ~ w,~G-TAB~G ~ iz~ va€~ GATES `'C~` E, s ~ Ct2ASS 5''N} COVERING w~.{ 4 ''i^ :L ~ ~ ~ ..i1.. v-rc''i:, ~ ,~.r~.:: - - - - - - - - ~f~'k~.. PC>flVTfNG 1 "'y ~;I' - t I 9 1 - - - - - - - - - - s t'. - PROKOE WE4l. ~ - CSC C,G~1iJ'vlhkJw° 'r~'G,~ NSTRUC7EOk i~ '•I 4tiE9 C SY~D AaEA j,, ' THIS AAA Dt1RiNG CO •;•i, a ~ p ~O OF FOUNDAiION & GARO~~ g;J.~ ~ IRd ~ _-ti~`yy :V NOTE: ENTRY LOBBY ~1 AT GLUBhf>CISE LE4EL5: .1 yS ` j,,,. r " ~ . , ~'N/ 31'-G~ NAYG = OATIRd - ~ ':'Y: : i _ '.-r"~ t 5 ELEVATION {><-O' ~ 14 i. s.. %z,,, ' ~ - PR01€~E SNORING AS REClITicll ~ ~ r~i~ is ,rn'.:~::.i~;• r5 , TO SUPPORT l3TILETIES ~ ROA?WAY. c~ s~`% umn ' t'on s stem that rovides 100 covers a to afl proposed ~ 1. A low vol +mga + y P 9 , • PRONOE DRAWWGS BY ENgNTfR t CERT1TiEO GI SATE OF Ti.OCdDA, ~ ~ ' 1 yi=°; plantings, wilt be designed and installed by the Contrac#or. at3 ~ - 2. The propposed Irrigation system must meet or exceed a!I applicable City code ~ J ~ F=' aG i h~'~~ requ+rements, (i.e„ Back Flow Orevention, Autamat+c Ram Shutof# evice, eta,}. 2C ;rr,. ~ , - a 3. Irri ation system must be inspected and accepted by Landscape Architect ' y ~ ust meet cit code section 3-i 2#33.C ur , prior to installation of mulch. lrrigo#;on m y ' sensor and timer. ~ tp provide 10[1% coverage, and include a ra+n I t. ,'~~~n i ~ s 4. Irrigation as- built drawings, which accurately and clearly identify all modifications ~ % • to fi of ins action and acre tance. ~ 1. The work consists of the complete plant moterial Installation as g, Ail font materials shall be grade Florida No.1 or better os 17. The vontractor shall notify the Landscape Archi#ect of any ~ P r 1~ ~ ~ &/or substitutions, must be subm+tted prior n p p art €:G I ~ o the drawin s and as here€n s eclfied, This work shall rades and standards for nurse fonts, its 1 confect or d€scre ancy in plans prior to performing any work. ~ spawn n g P outlined under g ry p Pa P I in of all lent moterial ASN acted aroo. r 5. The Landscape Contractor must cflordinate the placement and power supply fro. the 1 include, but not limited ta, the soppy g P and 2, State Plant: Beard of Florida, shall eanfarm to in the off specifisd, the furnishings of all Eabor. equipment, appliances and standards far nursery stock {ASNI 260.1-1980). ~ - ;s `r: ~ irrigation control timer with the General Contractor, ~ - ~ / 1i3. Contractor shall clean up and remove from the premises all connection with landscape instollation as Shawn on this plan. u Sur lus and discarded materials and rubbish from his canstruvtion. sEa.~~~crrre-;., GRGtN7GPJi~ ~ 6 ~ y ~ A, Further, the work shall include the maintenance of ail plants and All planting beds shall 6e mulched with 2 of 100 organic P s after s~~ is Ic planting areas until final acceptance by the owner, and the fiberous-type, grade 8 or better. 19. All shrubs and sod shall be guaranteed for ninety X90) day , ~ AO ~ fullfilling of all guarantee pravisians as herein specified. ed with vertival 2°x2" final accep#anee by Owner. All trees shall be guaranteed far one (1) _ ; 10. All trees 7' ar taller shall be staked and guy a tance b Owner. ~ f ~ ~ ~ ' , , w;i ,sir, , year after final acv p y ~:!F: ' i~;:' , all full a uoinE himself with the related Pine stakes ar 3 diameter posts as shown in details. No devlatlans , j z~ , 2. The contractor sh y q / ~ ~ ~ ' oter su I electrical su ly, and ether unless approved in writing. 20. Upon fine! notice of final inspection acc ptance the Owner will 1€: paving, s€te grading, w ppyr PP assume ma€ntenance and the guarantee warranty period begins.--~ " ' utilities to reclude an misunderstanding and to facilitate o P t'on Caif Cand 1_800-282-8881 rior tv any 11. Apply Chlpco F7onstar G with a. properly cohbrated granola it ' a ' trouble fires mstolla I y P opphaator that will apply the granules un'rfarmly after Inlt€al r ~ flit coordination, 21, Shallow wells, open surface water bodies, or reclaimed water must be used ,P construvtion for ut y lantin s have beam cam feted. I at a rata of 31 Ibs/100th sq» Van water, The distribution s stem far irri ation must P 9 P APPY as a suuace of Irnga I y 9 ,r~~°: z. ~ ~ , P 3, The contractar. is responsible for repairing any damages to ft. of planted area specified. Aa not apply pre-emergent chemical not bs connected to coon or mun€cI al water sauraes, unless it can be " tY ' a oevur as a result of work done by ~ - . ~:'..LL,.,_:,t exlstln lac€i€tles that m y demonstrated that these sources ore not available. ~-.;"LL t econtractar called far in this contract. The work performed - - h r { 1" 1 ~ ~ 't ether work bein 12. a i soil for all lent materials shall consist of two (2) parts esi such as low tra'ecto ~ 1, • r; under this contract w€il €nterface w€ h 9 22, Irrigation systems must utd€ze low volumed gn 1 ry '`~a,~h~yr, -~,r~~i;4w t e ~ I~' with one 1 art moss and two ounds fertilizer oration. ~r~n' Pa~'vn>;pr performed by other contractors, it will be necessary far t€ L, J II Pa P heads or soaker hoses to provide direct application and low soap 1, - G~lY',~Gi's 4i1~~K1Yr' N.~Y Pp~9 G,~-!f f~ 1 contractor to coordinate and schedule actIVIties, where per auv:G y1,ru, WC. EaACU Systems that overspray areas that do not require irrigation, sucn as ; NES STREET ss with other contractors and their subcontractors. v d areas will not be acce table. Hi h irri ation need areas must not ' nets dry, 13. Fertilizer shall be Iii-4-4, quick release, water soluble fertilizer pa e p g 9 I 4. No substitutes shall be made without written permission of and shall conform to the applicable State of Florida fertilizer laws. overspray low need oraes. Lhe Qtiirier Or' his outhorized rrui~ssr.c t •;F' materials shall be. watered by the contractor tharoughl k' • I 14. All plant y y 23. High water demand landscape areas such as turf must be served by a a plant list and the when planted and during the planting time period up to final acceptance. Pa { bads 5. the event r of a variation between the g separate irrigation zone than low water need areas, such as planer , actual number plants shown on the plan, the plans shall 15. Grass shall be St. Augustine and shall be well matted with grass roots, or mulched areas with trees. In no case, shall any planted vegetation area the sod shall be taken up in rectangles preferably 12"x14" and shall be be more than 50from a water supply hose bib. Lf 6. Plant materials will be inspected at the job. When inspected work a minimum of 2" in thickness, and shall be five, fresh and uninjured at c: does not comply with the requirements, replace rejected work the time of planting. It shall be reasonably free of weed and other 24. Automatic irrigation systems must be operated by an irrigation controller and continue specified maintenance until re-inspected and found grasses and shall have a soil mat of sufficient thickness to insure firmly capable of differentiating between the schedules of high and low water G C to be acceptable. Remove rejected plants and material from the to the roots to withstand all necessary handling. The sod shall be shaded demand areas. Controllers must have multiple cycle start capacity and I CN y R B planting site and replace within 48 hours, and kept moist until it is planted, dumping from vehicles will not be a flexible calendar program able to be set to comply with local or permitted. Damaged sod will be rejected. Replanting shall be done water management district imposed restrictions. 0 r. l . 7. All materials and equipment shall be installed in a neat and within 45 hours after time of harvesting or sod shall be kept damp or his architect reserves the until planted, Automatic irrigation systems must be equipped with a rain sensor device workmanlike manner. The owner or switch which will override the irrigation cycle of the sprinkler system I right to direct the removal and replacement of any items which in his opinion, do not resent an orderly and reasonably neat or 16. Sodding Schedule: when rainfall has occurred' 6 anlike appearance, provided such items can be properly (1) Soft spots and inequalities in grade shall be corrected workm I , . installed in such orderly way by the usual methods of such work before starting sod work. I ~ 2 Ground shall be sufficiently moist prior to laying of sod. 3 Lay sod without voids, Tamp or roll. Sod shall be thoroughly watered. The surfaces shall be true to finished 30" TYPICAL CROWN SPREAD i grade lines, even and firm at all points. (4) Place sod with staggered joints closely butted, tamped or { L rolled to an even surface to the required finished grade. Avoid continuous seam along line of water flow in swales, place sod in rows at right angles to slope. 20 LAYERS BURLAP PAD AT REMOVE DEAD AND INJURED ED SUPPORT CONTACT - NO IRS I, ~ NAILS IN TREE WOOD u 1 r RETAIN NATURALLSSHHAP. {y~ c~ t~ E. p C WiRE TIE !D " - 2 PLY REINFORCED 9 p -I RE CIV z _ M ICED M4 Q R~BBER OR PLASTIC HOSE, r,~umcnvEa ~ a 12 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE OSE, 2 x 4 BRACE (YELLOW PINE) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WIRE SPACE I E L 1 0 w m I 'N'A m"m%%wg ~ THREE AT 120 TYPICAL in n Q 8 205 z rw ntxre VARIES I tl ' o Twx smL aEVeTm: SET BASE STEM 1 WHITE SIRVEYOR'S TAGGING I^LL ~ I. m TMCAL TAPE, % LENGTH HIGHER THAN FINISH GRADE ;DING o 2' x V STAKE (YELLOW PINE) LL DEPART THREE FEET LONG NNING al PLA 1 3 - 2" x 3" STAKES DRIVEN INTO N OF C LL p wA . LEAR DRIVEN INTO 1ei l KMM tPLMT GROUND AT AN ANGLE, TriEN TIGHTENED CAS t~ 2' MULCH AS SPECIFIED TO VERTICAL POSITION 8 MINIMUM EN TIGHTENED SAUCER RIM I B~MINIMUM I 0rvbi~7, .J, taf:',H,\r,,j / !0 DEGREE ANGLE Li LENGTH, STAKES AT 1$0 DEGREE ANGLE F0=11) W" FINISH GRABS FINISH GRADE ! LIL.FM E %I0- 4 MIN. MOUND. TO FORM SAUCER C SAUCER - MULCH a x - cad +'d"',^ via( =III _ 3' MINIMUM MULCH LAYER ROOTBAIJ ib' MINIMUM t /°''L°M ' CH LAYER RADIUS FROM TRUNK L an \ M -I V, r ' WASHED-IN AND TAMPED fi T 7 \WATERED-IN CLEAN \ 6• 6'r WATERED DJ CLEAN BACK FILL \y EDGE DF SOD PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE 2744 Summer dale Drive IC ~ 60 34625 I AN BACKFILL II I EXISTING SOIL Curwi7ieC' 0 i ~ ~ STAMBIM BACK FILL WATERED IN CLEAN BACKFILL tmtTatLL \ UNDISTURBED SGIL \ r r \Q\/ I - - MINIMUM - I I I - 17- i~ T ~ U. \ \ \ I I III III-) I I I I PIT SIZE 1.5 TIMES BALL SIZE ~-I - II- Phone, (727) 720-B~3 I 1LL SIZE MINIMUM - 14 I: xc (727) 791-9899 I Li 1 ,Y&NA 1993 i SCALE 1 Qf ~ C ' TANG DETAIL . Y6P003I 1 t SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL TREE STAKING AND PLAN fm p - TRANSPLANTED PALM STAKING AND PLANTING DETAIL of a GROUND OVER PLANTING DETAIL N.T,S. N.T.S. I-- _ - NN CHECKED I r DATE DRAB C ~ I la~Goa Pa~Mf155 T.iC C 8 o ~ ~ a~ ~ _ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N - FENCE _ - - 00 I _ a~ c ~ I / - - ~ Q _ • ~ I /'p.`~ I ~ ~ o o ~ 10'-0" x 3D'-0" LONG SLAB FOR T ~ ~ ~ _ c .c T T T / ~ I '4 ~ o ca v~ 'r TRANSFORMERS J SOLID WASTE ~ I / ~ I I voi c~ v c STAGINr, AR€A ~ I / ~ I ~ o a eU U O GATE ~ 3 ~ U U U O ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . vi ~ ~ V O • ~ ~ ~ .y ~ O-- - - Z ~r W ~ L j / ' ~ ~ ~ U ~ nl r1 r Q o C ~ Q Q c ~ ~ ~ ~ I r ~ U I U f6 N AS (B IL U I ~ ` O ~ ~ O I / N U N N c c -6 > f? I U ~ ~ c ~ c 3 b-.- • •a O m .fir U 3 ~ to 1 I 4S3 ~ U I c.oc o."- ~ to c - p o ~ o ~ U I o$ c • U U ~ ~ V V G R 31'-0" T RTH N k ~ (l1 C 0- .fir Y U (B ~ p ~ c ~ SZ = to lf3 O r. J • 0 U O ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ i O~~°~~ z a I I f6 ~ ~ ~ t~l1 Q _U~ ~ GENERATOR ROOM ~ cLa ~ ~ U ~ ~ a t0 ~ C, ~ N U ~ s.. Q ca ~ N i~ . N ~ W. ardr w. Tea i . / _ ma 'I I 0 ~ ~ I • I I ~ 3 Z C~ - - ~ ~ ~ • I rn u~ ~-RETENTION I I I 3 L- - ti~ 1 n~ n . I M ~ • W L z r ~ 1L M r ~ NM ~ ~ , . • W ~ ~ ~ m tL • F U j d • p 0 • ~ ~ _ ~ ~ I ~ `-ca I Z. ~ ~ ~ NU I W 1 s~ RAGE . ~o G z . ~ ~ . ~ . c~ . ~ . - 6 a Y/ N N t' ~ Aso>> Q W W I t ~ ~ x / I Q / - F ~ C~ C~ ~ J / I • ~ • ~ .a a• © eE . L V m = O I o F- 1// N oa • o J ~ ~ ~ c~ a I ~ o Q i = ~ ~ •o -1?fT~d110N ~ r ~ . . _ ~ ~ a ~ a~ ® _ ® ~ ~ I ~ . Z J L ~u i ~ ~ a k-! r I ~ z 1 NOTE: SEE SWEET 4.1 FOR ~ Q .DOCK & SEA :WALL ~ • 1 ~ ~ ASOI l 4CoPyright•Grahamti;'aynAssedates,PA . . ~ I ~ z NI rights reserved. INFOR~fAiION T' ' W I T 1 ~ o Thismateiialistl~eexdus(veproperly am~w. ~ Q r o of Graham Design Assadales, PA. _ ~ ReproducUanin whdenr ~ pans.is. 4.J shidlyprohi6itedwilhau[Ihe pionwritten P-~ ~ pelm~sianofGratramDesignAssaaates, JQ <3 ~ PA and any such repradudion may ~ • subjectyoutorauilarxlloraimmalliabl7dy GENERATOR ROOM ~ ~ r underTit(et7afthetlnitedStGrtesGode. ~ ~ r - i x~ ~ / I 1 ' I ~ N v 00 ~ ~ O 1 " IA ~ - - r"' ~ M ~ 31 -ft ER T T I Q I ~ 5 ~ • LL A5011 JD L1 - W F- f Q f l~ I I ~ L 1 o ~ l 1 - \ z I V l J - _ ~ /.E PLAYGROUND ~ - LOCATION / 1..1.. W „ ~ / U DOCK T T 10 -0 x 20 -0 / ~ O t CONC. SLAB FOR / / 06 - T 8'=0" WIGW ftETA1NiNG WALL W ALUMINUhI TRANSFORMERS W / Z RAIL 0 TOP 0 ' ~ ~ AB Z W/ 0 AB C - ~ ~ d OD IN SOLID WASTE ~ _ • ~ I ~ STAGING ARE • ~z f lL , _ ma I 4 O ~ 0 \ I ~ Z - - - - ~ . (2)12-0"..WIDE GAZES - WIDE GAZES I 0 \ I GAZEBO - PROVIDE WELL POINTING \ LL THIS AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION \ OF FOUNDATION & GARDEN \ NOTE: ENTRY LOBBY SE 3i'-0" NAVO = FE: ENTRY LOBBY SET AT CLUBHOUSE LEVELS. 31'-0" NAVD = DATUM ELEVATION 0'-0 ELEVATION 0'-0" - PROVIDE SHORING AS REQUIRED TO SUPPORT UTILITIES & ROADWAY. PROVIDE DRAWINGS 'BY `ENGINEER CERTIFIED IN SATE OF FLORIDA. 1 I OR! I ~r I 4 AS01I GREGG HOLLISWORTH LICENSE NO. AR 0017669 NORTH ICE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL RETAIL 1 1 SCALE: V= 29-Q" THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA O 0000752 0 i 05-42 2 I 3 Asfll l I AS01I I AS-010 RECEIVEU, DALE DRAWN CHECKED NOV O 82005 1118105 MAW/JD TJG PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER _ o ~ a, w vii r----------- - ~ _ a~ ~ ~ c ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ m t ~ o'~3N- I I o~ ~ I I a~`~~ 3 ~ I I I c~ar,~ 3~~~ I I ~ 3 o 1 ~ i I I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I 1 m c~~. _ 1 I I ~ o~ m o I. 1 ~ v o 1. I I \ I ~30~0 r I GENERATOR ROOM I n. I _ a ~ ~ i I 1 I m ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 I I I ~ I. I ~ I v ~ I 12 z 12 CONCRETE N 1 I Q~ AVERS ~ a c I P ~accoi ~ ~ ~ I ~ -v ~ v, I „ c aQ o ~ LANDSCAPING ~ I 12 CONCRETE a ~ I 1 PAVER BANDING ~ ~ a ~ ~ I I 12' HANCOCK i TYPICAL ~ 2 HANCOCK I ( L o ~ ~ I LANDSCAPE FORMS I LAMPPOST BENCH BY I AMPPOST I 1 ~ a~ ~ 1 v y o ~ I I \ CONCRETE BANDIT ~ RECEPTACLE & CURB ANDING I I ' c a ~ ~ ,ONCRETE B 1 I -a ~ _ ~ 'r CURB I Q LITTER \ ( I ~ I . H C RAMP c~aa = '3 ~ I ~ I ~a~c=c I ~ LANDSCAPE I I ANDSGAPE i . I O L m ~ Ca] C~ I I o ~ ~ ~ c U U ~ O I 1. t~ c' d z CONCRETE BANDING / I 1 m C ~ ~ - p & CURB ~ / LITTER / Q ( RECEPTACLE 1TTER i GRAMERCY I o ~ ~ ~ fCEPTACLE I BIKE RACK LANDSCAPING ~ L N O 12 CONCRETE I BY MADRAX 0 0 ~ o .c i f I o J PAVER BANDING \ I HANCOCK IANCOCK 1 ~ ~ i ~ c I Z TYPICAL \ / ~ ) BOLLARD FOUNTAIN ~ ~ ~ i ¢ o I Z .y ~ "o ELLARD -c u n 24 x 24 CONCRETE I I t III i~llll / I ~ c -v -a ~ m 14 ° BENCH BY I PAVERS z ~ LANDSCAPE FORM TENCH BY I 1 a a c as ~ a~ c c a~ Q- .ANDSGAPE FORMS - o p LANDSCAPING - Q ~ i ~ I ~~~,oS=mQ I H C .RAMP ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c' I " 12 x 12 CONCRETE ~ CROSSWALK O ---I- t2 HANCOCK BY OTHERS ;ROSSWALK I N = O V I J PAVERS LAMPPOST 3Y OTHERS ~ I m ~ a ~ z ~ ~ ~ m o I I LITTER o I E- a~ m ~n I r ( I RECEPTACLE ~ ~ H/C RAMP f/C RAMP I I 'I „ " ~ 4 ~ 1 I I I BENCH BY - 12 x 12 CONCRI .LANDSCAPE .FORMS 2" x 12" CONCRETE 1 PAVERS I ~ 'AVERS I ~ i 24" x 24~ CONCRETE I LANDSCAPING f l I PAVERS I I ~ H C RAMP I ~ r C RAMP I ° 1 ~,6' / I r ( ~ ~ CROSSWALK ' 1 ;ROSS~ALK i `HANCOCK H/C RAMP BY OTHERS i BOLLARD IN OC 3Y OTHERS I N N I NC PA S...^ 1 12"CONCRETE ~ - ~ 1t A 124 x 24 CONCRETE PAVER BANDING ' 1 I p. ° 1 PAVERS I TYPICAL . . i 12 CONCRETE I 1 PAVER BANDING I m I I TYPICAL ~ { - 1 ~ i ( ) o I ~ I ~ 1 ~ 12' HANCOCK I • W ~ ~ ~ ~ J I LAMPPOST ? o i ~ ~ 1 ~ 00 - scALE:118"=1'-a° t o LANDSCAPING ~ ~ > m I ~ W I z i - _ ~ ~ 1 - I v I Z rr m - { a NU I W 1 i i 12° x 12" CONCRETE ~o SCALE: 1.18" =1'-D° 1 ~ ~ PAVERS ~ o l Z u, ~ I ~ Q I ~ ~ rnrn 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LL n M M I f/. 12 .CONCRETE z ti h 24" x 24" CONCRETE PAVERS i 1 PAVER BANDING - y I LANDSCAPING I (TYPICAL) y N " ~ O W ~N I 1 1 1 ~ ~ x / I F' a - / / ~ I \ I f LL ~ , Q / 12' HANCOCK ~ ~ I T T ~ / I ~ Qv / I LAMPPOST LANDSCAPE ~ 1 ' i ~ I i m = 00 ! 1 f 1 I 1 ~ N ~ 1 ~ CONCRETE BANDING I & CURB I ~ I i ~ Q I to l 24 x 24 CONCRETE l I~ - / I 0 ~ TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER C9 Q I PAVERS I ' I I a~~i a V ( 'o 12' HANCOCK I i ~ / ( LAMPPOST I r ~ F ~ I 1 i ~ I I 1 ~m 12 CONCRETE / ~ I ~ 1 Ic ~ I ~3. H/C RAMP o i PAVER BAND N HNC RAMP (TYPICAL) { ~ I 1 I I ( _ I I I I I I I 1 i C~Ce~ight-GmhamC~asignAssodates,PA . I I Atlrightsresen+ed. 1JTTER I ~ ~ RECEPTACLE ~ - I I 7hismateri~al islheezcNsive pmpetfy 1 ASPHALT PAVING I ofGrdliamDesignAssocptes,PA ~ / o I I Repmduc6anmwhalearinparlsis I i 1 s6~Uyproh~bitedwithoutthepriorwriiten ) HANCOCK / I ~ BOLLARD i. f, i r pemassonofGmhamDesignAssodates, I I PA andanysuchreprodudimmay I " " I 12 x 12 CONCRETE 1 subjedyau m d~nl andfaraiminal liabildy I i underTide l7ofthe United Slates Code. BENCH BY ° I S I PAVER LANDSCAPE FORMS I i 1 ~ ~ I ° I I o I I I I LANDSCAPING I I I• i SS + I CRO WALK I ~ I t BY OTHERS 1 i ~ ~ ~ I I • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ GRAMERCY c~ BIKE RACK ff(I HfC RAMP BY MADRAX (IIICIC~~« Q i " 1) 12 x 12 CONCRETE O LL PAVERS I j1 l J . CONCRETE BANDING H C RAMP & CURB ~ / W ~ / CROSSWALK / ~ I SCALE: 1/$" =1'-0" Q b ~ ~ BY OTHERS ~ k~ w U Q w W ~ ~ „ _ „ SGALE: 118" =1'-0" SGALE: 118 -1-0 Z W o b ~ a LL T L ~ W o z W I ~ L.L CAST POMA CORPORATION 'ONCRETE N BALL WEATHERGUARD ALUMINUM M FENCING WALT COPING IALL COPING I 1 CONCRETE a PIER CAP r N® I I 2» x 12u CONCRETE 1 PAVERS I 111 12 CONCRETE N _ PAVER. BANDING 2 TYP I TYPICAL I r CONCRETE BANDING I & CURB 12' HIGH CONCRETE CEMENT PLASTER ON NT PLASTER ON ILI] WATER TABLE $ CONCRETE BLOCK )NCRETE BLOCK fill l R /C RAMP I I 1 12 HANCOCK Bail CONCRETE I LAMPPOST CONCRETE WALL COPING I PIER CAP I LANDSCAPE A I 011 N I 00-1 I I H/CRAMP THOMAS). GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA ` I 1 N C000752 2„ TYP 4 I I I / .00, F 05-42 12° HIGH CONCRETE CEMENT PLASTER ON VED :NT PLASTER ON WATER TABLE 8" CONCRETE BLOCK RECEI ONCRETE BLOCK LAMPOST BOLLARD NOV 4 TYPE 2 2005 AS01 1 STREETSCAPE DETAIL PARTMENT IN GDE N P AVER W t tEAR OF c DATE DRAWN CHECKED CIN SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" »AM MuwsoS TJG - i 1ST LEVEL c ~ m rn ~ UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRCUMS BATHS SHEET REF. ~ v m ~°_~ya 0'°30= 101 IV-A - - - ~y°~.~°c m•-~_ ~ cry $ c _ 3 $ - 3 102 IV-A - - ~ ° v o •o ~ m cco tv, - ~ C N C IV-B - - m ~ ~ ~ 103 $ „ ~ ~oSoa I _ c co . 104 IV-B - - N ~ c o ~ c _ g'~N~.. 105 IV-C - - y ~ o $ °f E E ~ c p 106 IV-C - - - ~3 ~ ~ 2Z2 -ii d $ ~ ~ N _ C ~ O 108 A ~ ~ z''3 - - - 175 IV-C ° c > $•UJ~ C~~ 176 IV-C - - - " c 3 ~ =~o~ - - - c= o ~ 177 IVB - ~NC/~~ :1 V' W $ ~,I ~ C v 12 ~ N1 178 IV-B - - - " o•'rs° PR 3oxc ~ N9 ~ C = C N7 N11 - - - O•$ fA 4F.M. W/ TViRE48HOLD _ ~ . i i ' 10 179 IV-A E L o _c ® N i N3 • - :<x _r.1..- ~ N4 ~ to r._-- ~ ~ i . L Ny IV-A - - 180 ~ ~ Z • n ~ N2 -•I ~I_l 1 ~ Rou uP - ~ 1 ~ MTL DOOR ; ~ ~ , UNIT I -C - ,~~"y ~ m ~ ~ ~ 'MECH. & P co c c 176 I ROOMS yrn c o d •e ~ , i, UNIT N-A • ~ UNI' UNIT IV-B ~ ~ c ~ ~ a a 180 9° 1 ~ PR 3OXiO ~ . • - - ~ / 17$ ~aoEma 1s ~°.cw8~g' I N.M. ..L i ~ i i - / 1 'O H C 'V ~ STORAGE I - 2 N21 n ~ 2 tag - ~ a ...i . I 1 / ® ~Ea~ F- G>I l9 to t ' I I ~ 1 ~ _ J..._ 1 , I ® 2 a ~ i. I ~ -r 19' ~ m ? 19 PR 3oxce T i , i M ? ~ - -J ? B.W. W/CLOSE , ~ ~ Q 1 LOCK .._.'..1.• ~ . 2 20'-4' I I.._. 1 i. ~ TAS. 36 tpu~ I I - f, _ - ~ -r r'• ~ i I _ I i i- I II 5 d . I I 5 d P I I I • ..I.. r 1 i 0 a II N40 Not I I I I I 39 _ _ _ j 3 - - I ~ ~ _ C. I I I _ I ~ , I - ~ - - N31 ~ I O 0 t - m ® 1 ® ® I E6 1 N3 i----° ; i J ; E4 E5 0 . 4 ~ ' - UNIT N•B r STORAGE i ! ' , ~ 177 3 0 E _ _ o- , © ~ 177 I ~ ` ~ " PR aoxu ~ UNIT N-A i y~ 1. ~ I • ~ , i79 1 ~ - - ~ UNIT IV ~ ~ ~ •E W 175 ~ ~ O° i 1 • - 1 ~ 47 • ; ~ - 5 5 ~....i ! 1 I.._.. i 49 s ® 5 ~ E8 E9 EI s = ;O P ~ ' ~ p © . ® N - DEewearn . r r . w . BANP pl. N5 v. • J I ? . 'GY - I r 20'-4v O / 6 63 6 ~i~ w • 5 ar - ~ Q Z r- ~ a`. a~.v? ` y ~ ~ W ~ • ? a • ` ELEC. ; ;.;c • • `i •Y• V ' ~ ~ _ _ F' ~ - ti• - ~ ! / • t~ ........._.Y 14 1. i ~ ~ m Q ~ ~ , ~ i y~ ~ N ~ ~ V 4 i ' ~ E23 E24 0 E21 1 19 E20 ~ ~ u. ' ~ ~ / \ . ~I • , i i e p •fa'rehem0ea q>pooeme,PJL ON'• •f` \ y, • _ _ 21 ? ~ - © AI tbMneaerred. .n R. ' ~~3 - ThNmaM~le6le~zdlmMpraperly b Gl~lem Dedpn Aaeoda~e, PA - rj•• ~ Reposplr6alklrlloleaMpmbk 16' - ~ . ~ ~ ~ I >1trlt6yprohPo@sdrdtltoutEMWktw~al - i > . permbelonofGrahemDeegnAseod~ee, . . _ PAendery >~dkraN~ W ; \ ar ' _ _ - ud~ld tiot6ieUrdtedSbbeCoda ~ B ~ m ~ - - . . Y . - 'ti'. • t T: . • _ . _ _ ~ ; - . - - ...f.•. ~ i V i 1 ~ . N - • i y ~ i m ~ . ~ - _-i-_--_. ~ ~ - - ~ ` ark ~ , ~ r ti ~ , ` -i I E41 a ~4 /y ~T o o o - i ~ J ~ ~ LL ` i ~ . 4~ • ~ + ~ ' v.. _.1.. ; ~ ~ v+ I O~'. . w ~ L / - a QL ~ E44 ~ ; E46 4 3 • 43 % ~ _ tt l.11 ~ _ ~ ; M ~ ~7 ' ~ D ~ ~ / i _ . ~ ~ a a ~ I ~ v." 0 ~ 1 _ ~ . rr• . ~I ` ~ ~ w r r I ~ ; E49 E50 E51 V i O \ ' ® S19 N - . a ~ +r o . ~ m . ~ ~ ___I ~ I Z . 'Vi=i `-a" r ~ l.l.~ o rn . RY DecoR~nve ~ `.`~`W`.`.`.`~ y SB ® ~ S1 E53 E54 ' 58 ~ 16 3 BLOC ~ . ` - S9 ® ~ D ~ O 10 ~ S .a- ~ ' ~i=~`-=i-i--~.~=-i ~r-~: 51 SS 56 S7 r r. ~ Q F {.n ~ S2 - I ' t. O ~ --r:~:r~•. 11N~-C~ . erg ~ UNIT -D ~ 1 . rr®I s 1 AR m 4 _ _ Z UNIT (V-A UNIT IV-B 106 POOL 102 S29 0 GE o - 104 I PR 30X(3 EQUIPMENT I r I 1711 _ J XJL 30 X.M. STO GE _ _ S23 I 0 S23 PR 30X - I I I I ~ X.M. DOOR I__! ~ L ~ o 1 R I - - - 0 ''M PROVIDE FOR 10 - $ ¦ _ ? yg i I ? ? STORAGE UNIT, _ SIMILAR TO cxS' G.'`_' ; i URTS SHOWN 1 I I- - I : A A Q 20l,4- jok zm'-4- T.O.S. r..' Q I iD T.0.8. g PR Sox I._ i SAIL W/CLOSMT l LOCK 542, El III C 548 I E3 GREGG HOLDSWORTH ® s4~ LICENSE NO. H _-l -'t \ ® AR 00 ! 7GG9 S41 S41 / i N . $51 - I - C z STORAGE UNIT IV B 4$ C PR 3oxw y - - I - 45 MA < UNIT N•A 103 + UNIT MCI, MECH. & PUMP UNIT N S RAG !FOR G - 101 r:_ ;.I 105 105 t S5 Q eoxT UP D14 i E I ; . + It S59 S61 c ROLL UP - - o MTL DOOR a c">w f ~ S74 ' t!? 0 C1 569 2 . --4-L-4' 7 Y i S6 FGC RGMI-AND 66 GCSM -8EF PR RX 30 W/ ARCHV15ML FOR THREAS14OLD SLOPES s1 S7 S73., k LICENSE NO. EC THOMAS I GRAHAM AA. C000752 5 p S20 T pi I NIG PA ET 05- I E 10 A4 A I 26', W 265 -3 100 a o LEVEL MASTER PLAN 1ST DATE DRAWN CHECKED ENT LEVEL PLAN BASEM 1I1G=1.0° MAMJDS rio z +uoarori • 1116'= 4.0' I 2ND LEVEL w 0 ®rn ~ 5 •a 'cr3 UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDROOMS BATHS SHEET REF, a ~ ~ ~ o ~ 3 ~ N ~ ~ a L 201 IV-A - - - ~ y Y ~ rn ~ c c _ ~~~•oo . 202 IV-A - - ~ ~ c N R wc~~c 203 IV-B - - - $ c m ~ ° v ° o c a A 204 IV-B - 3 L c L m 294'-11' c~$~$ - - - horn n 205 IV-C ~ ~ ~ cEE~ 206 IV-C c .r m $ rA of d~ o - - - - 0 ~ y N1 1 207 IV D $ ~-o s~,'~ t t o ya N8 N7 N 208 IV-D - - - ~ a~ ~ $ c $Hm°'w. O N11 i Z „c•° c'3 I 209 IV-D - - - $ E i4 .N 3 N4 ~ N-D N2 N UNIT m ` ~0 ~ m - - - _ :~~g-c O ~ 5 N1s ; 274 ` ~ ~ $ O O ~ ~ c UNIT -C m - - - - c a~ - ai 3 t3 c~ NIT IV-A ' ~ 276 280 ~ ~Q UNIT IV-B °~coc€ 9~ : o 278 _ Q.BNC~o 2 214 IV-D - - - ~ o` N ~ c $ ~ E~ m 1a O x F- E ~ `m 275 Zrnass ~ r; - ~ ' i "m ' I I ® ~ ® - ~ ~caa'm 276 IV-C - - - ~ c ~i H rn cv ~ I ~ II I n I. c ~ ~ ~ ~ aa~ 19 a _ _J ~ J ~ ~ ? ~ ? - 277 IV-B - - - ~ •c. E ~p~as N2 a0 ~ - - - - 31'm~ - - - - - .a t N © C - - - - - - - - - - ~ C - - - - - O L0.5 0 ® . 278 IV-B - - - ~ g c. ~ ~ E E ~ ~ as rn ~ ~ ® I I I I II 35 ` II II 279 IV-A - - I. ~ I I I 40 N4 ~ z 3 I \ _ ~ II I I 39 II I 0 >A= - - - W ~ I 280 IV-A w wv,~3 I - 31 ~ ~ 38 I E I - to ICJ , 3 3 w - t~ UNIT IV B 277 a UNIT IV-A " . N ? I UNR IV- GAME 279 27 - 5 ROOM GEIIATOR. RO(~I 49 44 © a~ !4 45 ~ E8 E9 I ' O N N5 ~ I 5 - - - / i m z ° I ~I`. W g N61 ~ I WaE I 6 6 ~ ~ ~ g ~ 0 E1 t I a. V ~ I k r °°°ooeo°°°°°°°°°°°vo 183'-ll' ~ ~ ooo°eo°°°°°°°°°°°°°°~ 000oo0ooaeooooooaooo ( ~ r ~ _ °°°°°°°°°°ec°°°°ee°° °d N V v\ I z y \ LS33 I 1.~ _ , . _ _ _ J J 000000000000000000 I ~ ~ oo ~ ` 13 E14 > O . \ _ E14 15 E1 00000000000000000 7 1 Z O 000000000000ooo0ov O 0000000000000000000 I H o , ~ • ~ ooeooooo000000000000 ~ - ~ 00000000000oooooaeoo I ` 1~ n 0000000°0°o00°aoo°0000000 I ~ ~ 4 W N f W v 9S33 ~ Q I ~ ~ 19 E20 a oeo ao° aooa ooao ~ Q >L i ~ E2 °°°°°°°00°°°°°°°aoe E20 00000°00000000000000 O O i ° ° °ee eee _ _ , o a 00oooooaoooeooooooao ? D00000000000000000000 Wf7 ? V N 00°0000°000000000000 W 6 Q' v W ~ r 000oooooeoaoaeoooaoo a v Z I O p W y JAJ ~ N Z SW U"'U I pj ~ 7 - E\, SS33 ay"~ ~w~ I ~ J \ .,Z iW UEU ~ ~ N^RZ WOW ~ ~ Q ..i' - 00000000000000000°0 vJv~+K JQ.'J I . - ~ E2 - r o eooouooo 000000 0° u wt,.w o°°°°°°°°ooo°°°°°°°° I . - ~ 1:. 'r....:~;s a e J;t.' 0 v - k > I J ~ ? lllUlmlIIIUIINIIIIIIIIIIIIllllllllllllllll111U ? B B ~ ''t aumuunnuuu0uuunuunnuuuunm y F p -IH ~ iiniviiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimiiiuiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin~ d Z ~ J N ~ _ IIINIlllllllllllll^'^""'*^tiM°ttl'[llgltt --•-&'.?{Y -__.~t~ Ilttllllllll~lllll.l, ,~wloll cn w ~ - OCoPyrlpld•Orehem Oe~pnAvodetea,PA nnlunuunnl~~ ~ ~ i • iunnn z q - - tmnnunnun~.. I loom r all~neMNd u J ~W I ~ Th~meb~IbOee>IdualwpopeAY > 4 a J d~dbn4~whdeaM Pb 0 o I ' a~ F.. s~IPmll~edw~houl9Mpiorw~an - - - - - E33 a, r.c.. _ IlondQehemDe~gnAwode~, 000 00 000°oooea°oooa° o° PAJ<beAyWdIRP~Y M q~OCfymltDdY991dk~p(fll~~ 000 000°0°0o eooooo° oo I I mderTdlelTdlhelk~edSt~eCade. - - - bS33 l F\, N I 37 ® E39 J \ E4 00 uocuueoo°e° oo°o° o° 41 E4 O oeooooo000000000000 ooaoooooeo0oeaoooooo _ i I ~ - .r I 000000°000°°000000°0 o o Q 0o0oavoeooooeoeooooo ooooeeooooo000000000 ( 00000o0ooeooooo00000 r _ ~ £S33 I 'tiM 3 N M 44 E4 00000°0000ooooouooo 47 I ® eoo0eooo0oo0oooaooo ~ a 000°°000000000000000 - ' - - ~ Z 0 U aeeooooooeoo0oooooee - - - ~ ~ a ooaooooo00000oooooao U aooa°°°°°°a0°°°°°ooo ~ - - - - ooo°°°°°°°oo°°°°°oao J > I ~ u. - - - ZS33 I Q... ~ Z23'-1' - _ ~ _ I ~ ee°°°°ec°°°ec°°°°° a p~ 19 4 00000°000000°00°00 Q 19 00000°°°°0°0 000° oo°°° o _ I 41L., a I~ 000000oooooeooooo00o I o0oeoooeoeaoooooe0oo I _ _ eoeooeooooo000ooooeo 0000000000000oooeooo - S~7 - ,.~j • - ( VJ 4 \ \ ~ Si Si ' \ , iS33 I 0 1 ® SB - :v ;Sib 34 34 E5 0000°°0°0°0 ooooouooo I 0oooooeooooo0000000 O Si4 S15 S3 ~ S4 S9 ip oeoooaoooaooao°0oo00 I O O S2 S5 56 O 57 O O ~ I Z 4~ UNIT I -D - UNIT (V-C m BILLIARD - GENERA"~0R ~ o ~o I ~ w~ UNIT N A ~ 208 ~ ;;~t ROOM Z I w ~ UNIT IV B ROOM ~ 53 202 sz9 204 s s~ ~I SZ6 t x ~ S3 24 m @ S31 ~ I f ~ T $ Z ~ y O 53 52 ® - I ~ y fY }Wql=-W I - . _ I ~ ' I I I © L ~ - ~~~3 N o ?~oo I Z i ~ _ uwm i I I I „ OR IN III S25 N _J L O O .0 ~ J o ? S7 N Ira ' O - - - - 31'0 - - - - 0 - r~.~ 549 0 S4 El~ • 111 I _ 40 ? I I I , I C 5 544 13 r 0 S41 G 0 I k J i I C r\ Tii A C N I UNIT IV B Q . ~ 1 Na d0 UNIT IV A 203 ; 201 UNIT IV-C 205 m 557 UNIT IV-D UNIT IV D S59 Sb0 S61 209 O GREGG HOLD5WORTH 555 O 207 0 LICEN5E NO; 0 AR 00 17669 ~ S6 565 6 S69 56 a o 5 S70 ~ 567 S71 y Z O 334'-l' THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICEN5E NO. AA 0000752 A N 2PR RAN NI N F LEVEL MASTER PLAN 2ND 1 , w 1 01 0 DATE DRAWN CHECKED O 2 11A&95 MAWIJOS TJ0 o . ~a~s~ v ~ $ ° 3RD LEVEL o 3 N~ ~ ~ 3 N RF, ~~m"c UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRQEMS BATHS. SHEET E ~ y ~ 3 EvO~ oa o 301 IV-A $ $ N c °$am:a° 302 IV-A - - - ~ ° ~ ° o ca~ ~ A m c=~ 303 IV-B - - - c c ~ $ $ m ~ W C _ ~N 304 IV-B - - c E E ~ '3~ N - - - - ~ ~ ~ $ fA' 305 IVC 'aB~O~ c $ c Z' 3 ~ t 306 IV-C - ~ o ca ~ a L N8 ~ ~ ; C ' ` N7 N z I - N11 UNR IV F 307 IV-D - - - $ ~ utt .`~•°c3 372 ~ N . - - N4 ; UNIT IV-D 308 IV-D - $ ~ „ ;C N C - C N2 s N5 374 16 ~ $ 309 IV-D - - - ° o ~ ~ c UNIT I -C m ~$~So~o UNIT N A m 376 380 UNIT IV-B z 0 c 'c3 cao ~ 310 I D _p L c ~ ~ 9u I Q ~ ~ 378 " G. = W (p L ; • I I - ° C O L- 1a ® I N20 N21 ® a - t. m ~ _ I - A O ~ ~ ~ r 372 IV-F - - - Z $ ~ ~ ~ r: ~ I " I I . c.o °'o~a~ ° c c - I " I ` " .373 IV-D - - - ~ c o c ? ~ ? 3$•oEm°. " 2 ? ~ 41'•S' - - - t 374 IV-D - - - ~ .c ~ $ ~ c - - - - - - - - - - ~ N L ~ .og°ya 6 0 ? 375 IV-C - - - t ~ ~ •E ~ o" ? " 3 ~ I Q I I co 'H . ~ I ~ ~ II ` r , ~ ev~, I ~ 40 ~ ~v~~1~3~ e 376 IV-C. - - - 3 I - I I I -I I ® ~ 0 _ I ® 0 377 IV-B - - - N31 0 ~ 38 on J IlP 4 E4 E5 E8 ® tout 378 IV-B - - - U IT •B UNIT IV A 379 UNIT IV- m ~ - - - 379 IV-A 375 UNIT N-D 4 5 Wo y 373 4444 ~ 380 ' IV-A - - - 44 45 ~ ES E9 .IN 50 N51 ® r . O ® O r Q .r: m ' 55 5 N S N61 W p E 2' - . LL. m Y. 6 EtU Ett E1 N g . ~ ®8 64 i:s.. _ ~ z ~ U > ~ 13 1 14 > 15 - Et6 1 E18 zj ~ O 6 ¦ Z - ~ y o W W ..c ~ F' ~ aLL ® 1 9 3 20 . E2 O ~ - ,x ~ m O~ r ~ y 0 - H ~ ~ E2 z: ~ t .t c 't~ V J i J ~ 1 a W B - - 4'uccceaoeoea"o"ccuacccaueo"ca B oooaooooo00oooooaoaoo o0 oaoooo oo°o°baee°o°ocuu°ec ~ aoaooaaaaooalooooo0000 i rooooooooy-Ti, '~~riooo 0oooooaoo I;~I o0o OCOpytbllt•C>f~nDeeIpAA180ddeE,PA lnnnnnnnnd .inn u J ~ TfiamtlerWbihaar~eplapalty > a dQ~hem0edpnAtaodabe,PA. ~ Repodudmhvfidaabpsbb ,.r a ~~1Ipol~dvahaAAwpriatw~ ,_.~:,5'~7;"^; ""..r E33 parti~andt~mnDeegnA~a, PA and any such npodudbn ary au6jact yat m dvi andla a6rirel fm6~y wdx11tle17dfleU~ed~ea0oEa, . ~ 7 E3 9 40 E41 E42 ti M i 44 45 46 E47 48 > ~ a ~ ~ ___t ~ 1 - - ~ ~ LL - 8 S 49 E51 LJL. Q 519 ® ~ ® L' 11t ~ LJ-1 J Sil U r " Si Si3 g ~ o SH amnoa~ ®1 4 14 1 d 4 53 ® W U S9 53 S4 O 10 ~ Trt~ ~ WTI , sz z s5 ss ~ UNIT IV D d ~ ~ o Z si Q NIT I -D 310 U } o UNIT N-C m m Zq ~ W 4.Li NR IVA 308 aTM u ~ , 536 302 1~ UNB szg ~ ES ES S38 Q iT~R Ill n; 'n i z 304 r " ® ~ Q 24 , S3 ~ on @ ~ ~ S3 I © ¦ S3 39 ~ F=„ _ ~ 0 $2 _ wma aa~ i T I _ T etim I I ~ I ~ WOO?4 Z. v Q _r ® ® L-I-J ~ ~Ct Iy1 .r. I I I p 7~TFe I ld~lZ11~313 k I .4h 525 i)v. EL ? - - - - - - - - - - - TAB. S49 ao F9 S4 ~ ~ ? - I 0 r ~ I a?" J" ® I C O S41 q J . I I C ORIGINA- v Na d" UNIT IA UNIT IV-B I m 303 301 UNIT MC 305 ® L GHOLD5WORTH sss ss, UNIT IV D UNIT IV-D s Q © 307 309 UCEN5E NO. AR 0017669 558 S6 Sfi5 S6 ~ O ® 5 5 1 j S70 >>0 UNIT N-F S6 311 S71 S7 s~ sr c Z. o: THOMA5 J. GRAHAM UCEN5E NO. M 0000752 film 05-42 NV0 101 3RD LEVEL MASTER PLAN R RTV1 N1 A 1 F ! WiffER w 02 a o DATE DRAWN CHECKED O ItrM06 raawrms Iii) Z t Jj o ~ a~ C ~L ~ 4TH LEVEL ~ ~ a~ 3 a' ~ m= SHEET REF, N y ~ ~ ~ UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRCBMS BATHS Y ~ N c~ac - 3•~, 401 IV-A - - ~ ~ _ ~ z 283'•1" ~c~aw acw~c I 402 IV-A - - - $ ° a•~a ~.°~~c A .403 IV-B c y i ~g~$ c a, ~ 404 IV-B - - - • ~ ° w o ~ ~ ~`~2E 405 IV-C - ~ ' m c ~ v $ ~ c ~ o~ ~ - , 1 406 IV-C - - - a c 1 14 ~ ~ NB a ~ . 3~ N ' M Nt1 UNIT IV F UNIT IV F 407 IV-D c ~ , c 4 472 8•N°'~~ 4 47 . c ~3 N3 0 N4 ' UNIT IV D - 408 IV-D - - - ~ $ ~ m~ i ~ N5 - 474 1a _ - o~~ UNIT I -C - I 409 IV-D - - - w c ~ c ~dm8 UNIT IV-A ; 4 - - I 0 76 ~ ~ o ~ 410 IV-D - - . - c a;~ .UNIT IV-B N _ _ 480 - . Ka 9u . - : ~ ~ I G1 ~p V R! ~ c .C G I Q w i 411 IV F o c \ ~ ' I 120 21 - - ' - _ ~ - - E a; aa`~ - 472 IV-F - - - p ~ ,~.c ~ I I I- ~ I I ~ ~ I I I I z~~Q~ ~ a N 1 I ~ II I I II It I ( ~ I P I I - ~ ~ o~ .473 IV-D - - a c ~ ~ $ N ~ c~ ~ ~ c ~ ~c c ~ 3Fia~ 474 IV-D - - - ~ a a Bp m a- ? ~ S .•4. _ ~ 2 _ ~ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ Z N G~ ~ ~ '0 C ~ ~ - C ~ - Q A 475 IV-C - - - ~ c ~ .y 3 I ~ I - m~E°' c`o.N:~~ ~ i.-~ I 3 I i I ~ 476 IV-C - - - B I I 40 f ~I I Q I I ~ I1~ I I I I ao - \ i t I ~ I 3 .s 477 IV-B - - - i ® - 33 i ~ I ® I ~ ~ ~ 4 \ iii ~ - i \ i 3 w - 4 43 E4 E5 E6 O _ s-~ 478. IV-B - - mm ` - UNIT IV B © - UNIT N A 477 _ I. 479 IV-A - - - 479 UNIT IV - . ' UNIT IV D - 5 475 - - 473 480 IV-A - - - NN ® 4 ~ 44 44 45 E7 E8 E9 O r 5 51 ~ n; ' S 5B © . 2 5 ' 'L1 W - 6 E11 ~ 3 6 E10 1© ~ m t1. m _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ r t3 W P 183'-II' U ~ - > 13 14 ~ 14 ~ 15 16 fl 1® © _ ` Y ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ..ww fig Y/ N o ~ W ~ ~ N ~ 19 EYO E23 LL EYO E21 ~ a r,• r, _ _ Y - a a m o~ _ ~ ~ - H a ~ a ~ E26 ~ a 0 z~ ~ , ~ . W- U U ~ - e ~ a ~K~ > - ~ _1 _ ~ ~w 11 _`i ~ Q 6 000000 oaoooaaaa oaoooos LL B 70 n000000n00000On00000 ~ - no o¢oooo¢ooooooooooaoooo _-SL.-_;f - - - ooooooeee ; ~ iooe 1000OOOOeo ji; nooo u ~nnnnnnnnn ~ ronn (f ~ 0 - - U. ~ NCopyt~ht Dea~nAeeodaEaa,PA r > ~ ~ w fikm~delb6emeProperb > a a. ~ ~ d@kahmDaelQlAeaodaae,PJ~. M ; ~ a Repor~lonNrero~eahpahb •>a 33 ahktlypoNbi~dw~aiauieprlorwrl6en p~londddwn Ded9nk~odtlee, P,A, end aya~h npiodu~tlan mey mid you b drl for atr~ai tl~Y uderTidtl)d9r0idhdSm6uCad~. E39 E4U E4 4 - y.., E44 E44 E45 46 4 E O a Z c U U a J - - _ O LL 223'-1' ~ - - - 4 E51 19 . 19 . ~ 9 Q ® Q '.4 7-~ r - ~i-~1 s1 'J v s11 s1 a - ~ a se s - 1 53a 4 534 535 O ~ 0 W 1 15 r- S3 S4 59 S1 U tl! O - ~ o s2 _ IT IV D Q ss ss ~ UN lU z NIT -D - - 410 ITIV-C _ U 0 } ~ ` 406 408 UNIT IV A ~ - I I 53 S3 55 E56 7 'I a UNIT N B s3 402 _ _ ~ - - © lL41 ~ J \ ~ ~ e I - $2 I ~ S3 > I ` ox ~ " i ~ ` ® 531 I I 3 ® / I i36 S39 \ 7 - i' a - \ _ I is i \ i I I I S2 I I ~ I ~ I , ~ I I I~ I I I I I L ~ If z I ~ r I 3I " J L O i - o , 0 TDA S49 Q r ~ _ - w r , r - I 4 0O ? E - - ? I _ 0,0 - / I I i I I I I I C JE4I \ / I I. I I I I. I I I z I ~ 541 / / I I I J i ORIGINAL _ dD N UNIT IV B S46 I - - o , - - UNIT IV A _ I - 403 I I m 401 UNIT IV C - 405 - s~ : - - UNIT IV - -D UNIT IV D sss s s6, - - 409 407 _ i GREGG NOU)5WORTH lie UCEN5E NO. AR 00! 7669 ~ 64 65 S68 ~ O s ® s UNIT IV -F s UNIT IU F Y 411 411 S66 N Z 0 N THOMAS J. GRAHAM UCEN5E NO.. A AA 0000752 323'-3' REC 8 2 05 F 05-42 401 4TH LEVEL MASTlks lill"% A IMIJ ER PLAN P 115' =1 4 O ! E a 103 D DATE DRAWN MECIM It= lUwkw TJr Z c ~ rn m vos ~ ~ ~ i ~a ~'3aNi= 5m«va Nyg~r ~~Y ';~N~3 ,UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDROOMS BATHS SHEET REF. ~ ~ _ 283'-1' ~ y = W N 501 IVA ,c~p.-,~ ~ a,o I A 502. IV-A 'v, ~ c ~•~$~v, co•~~$ ~`orny 503 IV-B - - - w ~ o c~E ~ m. 504 IV-B - - - ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~°'°'$v; ~~a~, 505 IV-C - - - o ~ • " c a,~ ~'~3 , t ~ ~ o N6 UNIT N Nl N - - - .h L UNIT N F 506 IV-C ~ m~ c d ~ ~ 572 N11 f' 572 $ y ~ c ~ 507 IV-D - - - ' c ~ y ~ NI3 N4. y A N2 r. ~r c 508 IV-D - - - ~ H °c ~ c ,s : UNIT IV D Lmo$ ,~~"e UNIT -C ~ 574 0 0 ® - - - ~ 509 IV-D - ~ a 7 UNIT IV A 5 6 ®c o 580 ~ n UNIT N B N2 ~ 90 578 ` ~ Y W 3.$ N Woo • . 510 IV-D - - - E ~ y ~ ~ \ ~ - - $ "N ~ V1 d 1 ~ ~ P ® . 120 N21 _ _ _ _ ~ E a~ 511 IV F :7 ~ .C ~ I - ' I I - ~ Z 0 m m ~ a 572 V-F - - - ea o as I c I I I to ~•a .fig „ _ I ~ I n~ is Q ~ - -J O J ~ :~O c 'Z3 a ~ . 573 IV-D - - - 'a E m o. A _ _ p 2 ? 0 3'-~. N $ ~ C - - - - - - - - - - ~ s 574 IV-D - - - a c co a ~v _ 3 ~ a o ~ , I ~4. ~ 575 IV-C - - - ~ ~ 0°1~ I m , N 3 I ~ l ~ _ ~ I I - p 4; .576 IV-C - - - ' I 3 ® gi N31 ' : f 0 m ` ®3 O vu ~ J uP 4 a E6 577 IV-B - - - ~ E 0 to an 31 W U T.V B K l T pn UNIT IV-A 578 IV-B - - - UNIT IV 579 575 m - UNIT N-D 579 IVA - - - w 49 ® , Q 573 N N ® E7 EB E9 N51 ~ N5 O O 580 IV-A - - - E • 5 5 m 5 W m E10 Et 1 E1 © m - '4 L M." 183'-II' 7 V ~ Z N • u J U > 13 Ei4 Ei4 E45 - E18 Et i8 0 - - - - ~ ~ y ~ n. o W ~N W ,-c ~ Q H ~ 19 2 ~ a r Ez, ~ ~ r W T O ~ N - a o y . c~ a ~ E28 ~ ~ _ - U u ~c _ B m ~ - . - _ - - ODapnght•O~anDas~nAeaodelee,PA A6dpAlbreeariad. U m nederid 6 eie e~ldNe praapedy dtnDe>>pnAssodaba,PJ?. d' m . • ~ O petmbdottd0~nDea~nAuodataa, PA end any eudl ieaoduc6an mry tu6Ject you do dul a~ht almYd deCBtty tt5der11Ee 11 dfulMted 8tetea t1Ode. 7 E38 ~ 9 40 E41 4 Vi N: .I t` •'I as 4d Q 46 47 E ® 0 Z U J v _ _ _ ~ O, > ~ ~ 223'-'{° ~ ~ u~ - a s1 51 S20 E49 E5p E51 QL 3 b ~ W ' ~ s1 ' ~ ~ 1 . U7 sl1 S6 - 516 34 g 34 535 2 E53 4 W emaoo~ ~r-ov 1 54 59 ~ 1 O U p~ O 10 77:e~ S ~ W O ' S2 ' S5 S6 em~~mw sl ~ UNIT IV D 0 1 UNIT IV C UNIT -D 5 0 W Z 0 N UNIT IV A 508 ~ ~ 506 tY U -B , 502 5z9 S36 S36 55 ~ 56 E57 W ® O O ~ 52 a~ 4 on . " ~ ~ 531 ' I ~ d nv;ar S38 I S38 9 ' - m ~ 3 p I , s~ ~ - O ~ ~ Z 530 I I j un n I i 4 rrr~ i 2 I 0 Ehaj ' ? O ? 49 S4 rr - _ r N N ® I Li ? ? I I N ,t I t I S40 ~ I 0 0 - ~ . I S44 ® ® 0 7 Sot i ~ O . NO dA O c UNIT IV•B 54 m UNIT IV-Al ORIGIM~' 503 UNIT IV m 501 505 sss sst UNIT W-DI UNIT IV D GREGG HOLD5WORTH ssa Q 509 507 UCEN5E NO. AR 0017669 0 S64 65 S6 S69 S63 O 5 ` ~ S70 5 O Q UNIT IV UNIT N F S6 ' 511 511 sit S7 s~ Q k z. 0 as 323'-3' THOMA5 J. GRAHAM IJCENSE NO. Q AA 0000752 8 Nv0 05 05-42 NN E R T 5TH LEVEL MASTER PLAN FC A R 1 104 0 DATE DRAWN CHECKED . O z lion NAWGDS TJQ li O ~ m N C p} V 3 :0 'S ~ ~ ~ N= 6TH LEVEL H N ° ~ w • c~m~c SHEET REF. 3 ~ ~ " 3 UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDR58MS BRTHS ~ _ ~ ~ 'D ~ ~G ~ N - N G N..• ~ 601 ~ ° 'o^ rn° ~ a° IV-A _ - - . ~ ~ ~ ro 602 ~ ~ A 603 IV-B - • ~ c rn~~~ c E 1= 2831-1' 604 IV-B ~ $ c ~ ~Ec$ui _ - c a w ~ IV-C - ° 605 Z.'~ cacLo - soya 606 IV-C - - ~ ~ c _ ~ 13 13 ~ 1 S'N,~ c~ UNIT N8 • N7 N 67i UNIT N-F _ - - - _ 3 607 IV-D $ ~ ~ 672 y _ ~ O ~ N11 O _ ~ ~ c_`c IV-D - - v c c 608 ~`m~o$ N N4 UNIT IV D c~,~c N5 674 N2 - - - . coo c - 609 IV-D ~ 3 a ca 1 -V UNIT I : ~ m c .°c = ~ c. $ ~ m ~o 0 - - - 676 UNIT N A UNIT IV-B N~ 0 610 IV-D E ~ N +o, c 0 5~~~° . 680 ~ ND g ~ 67 N . I I _ _ ~ E~ m - ~ \ . , 611 IV-F O • ~ .o Z 18 ~ . ` ~ N21 ® - - - c a . ® " I ® - ~ ~ I I - ~ - - - ~ ~ 'fl Of 672 IV F - ~ c ~ .c_ - ~c~°~c i ® - I I I ~ - ~ _ c•a aa~ 0 I ll 73 IV-D - - 3 E ~ a 6 at ~ rn W $ c _ I M ~ :?0 O ~ ~ ~ -J 1 ~ m - _ _ Z _ _ 674 IV-D - - _ ~ 'y •c _ - ~ E $ 675 IV~C - - 3 ~ I 1 '676 IV-C - I Q II •na I ~ _ I 40 40 N - ~ ~ ~ , I 0 I ' 3 I ~ - 677 IV-B - - I ~ ~u~ . 0 ® DN N31 ~ ~ uP E4 E5 E6 _ ~i 0 _ - IV-B 678 O 3 w , • a ~n - - ~ U -B 679 IV-A - CC UNIT IV A 679 - UNIT N ~ 675 . ® - _ 680 IV-A - . UNIT N D Ns ~ 673 45 E7 ~ O O ® O m 49 ~ ~ 59 •r i ' y tai 5 N51 5 5 5 Id.. 6 10 E11 1 ~tl •:s c`ei U i . W ' 1831-~~' ` _ i \ o t3 14 V ~ • > Ei5 16 E1 ~ 14 ti y., r y Iw f~~ iV N O W 11,1 ~ a F~ aLL t~ 19 3 4 ~ Q 1 M 0 W „ O ~ 2 Q ~ N c~ a w E2 ° - © 'S - .n. U B - - OChI•~ehamDe~Jwodtles,PA B _ _ - - a~ - thrma~daniemmueNepropeib dd~smDeelgnA~ode6ss, P.I~ RapodudbninwlalaahpEgmb ~ e~ ~ tla > ~ D+ Datign a PA 8Iry Iepodu~9af ley • 3 Youmd~lerdforClrtdrei6~ity unbrT0e17dtlieUn~edSO~slkde, 38. 38 E4t 4© - ' - Q E48 ~ ~ 44 ~ E46 47 a' LL J U - J ~ 123'-'I' Q a s1 y.~ _ _ - 49 so E51 s, ® w • w.;. w . ~ v7 a g a . W ~ ~ S11 13 51 4 Si E5 ~ ~ N © 0 I O S14 15 i , a - S9 S10 O 5 ~ i ~d U - ~ NIT IV D VJ ~ ~ s5 ss s~ 0 60 Q. 1 UNIT I -D ~I~i ~ UNIT IV-C 0 m 7 UNIT N A V.g 606 ~~.q sus UNIT i S31 ~ 36 O :r. 602 116 s2s Dx~ N D6 26 i°°crrR oN a S39 I O ~ 0 3 a ® Z c~. L J ' - M161 FA I Tf:er MIPf U25.1 ? Ll/ L/ 0..9 w 13'•8' - - - - - - If TJOA 0 ? - - - - - S49 El e (F) w o a C, 1 C 0 4 ~ 1 ~ V - I 4 ORIGINAl- J i \vr Q; Na UNIT lV B s45 ~ e GREGG HOLDSWORTH UNIT IV-Al ,~03 UNIT IV-C LICENSE NO. Sol 605 UNIT IV-Dl UNIT P/--D W9 AR 0017GG9 S61 P7 S59 N L D6o S6 S68 S6 55 S63 R_ 70 UNIT IV-F ss UI S6 56 611 S71 S7 S7 73 z. i 323'-3' THOMAS J. GRAHAM EC liff Rfm LICENSE NO. AA 0000752 A N 20 ET FO-5-42 P I G PA t 'TV C, ITNV 0 A 6TH LEVEL MASTER . PLAN 105 il18- i -0' c DAM DRAWN CHECKED C3 MaHn~s rya z ~ i d ~t ~ ~ ~ = - fA f If1~GYG~ yd. a 0 G~ = toy c ~ t C t ~ V N UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDROQMS BATHS SHEET REF, c c 3 ~ C .mac 'G ~ ~ 701 IV-A - - - c s m ~ L t~ 0 a v+ - - ~ O V O 702 IV-A - ~ a ~ . A cam ~ = c•c rn 703 IV-B - - - c ' $ ~ $ - ~ ~ ~ 286'-II' - ~N ~ 7 704 IV-B - c d m m e~ ~o~ 705 IV C c a c, o ~ c 13 706 IV-C - - ~ ~ ~ i a N6 UNIT IV F ~m> c UNIT IV F _ _ ~ 0 - N7 N 772 N11 707 IV-D - ~ N ~ c •'r"'- 772 . c ~ y ; 4 ~8~E.~ N3 0 - N4 ~ 708 IV-D - - - " c - .c - c U VD NIT I 0 N5 ~yg~4 L V n4 UNIT I -C p , 709 IV-D . - - - ° ~ ~ ~o~~ - 776 UNIT IV A 0 ~ ~ 3 :a S0 UNIT IV B 0 710 IV-D - - - m c ,°c c ~ a$mm~ / 778 / ~ ~ , I ~ c . ~ , - _ I 711 IV-F - - $ m ~ m 18 ~ ~ t-~~~` N2 ® - I ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - Z o 0 720 IV-R - - m ~ n• ~ • / ~ / ~ V I I ~ i i - ~~a m co c c 0 I ~ 7 P as sa 721 IV-M - - - ~ c c 'c ~i ~ ~ / 1 c•~ ~ arsa ~c, Em ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ? Q . - coo ~ ~ vi V_G - - w 8 c 722 I „ ` c ~ B M 85'.4' 2 .o c ~ to a. 'V' A$. 0 e A 723 IV Q ~ ca •N = ,o - o ~ ~ k? - 0 1 N - 1 I II 3 Iw~n ,c,o~ I 751 IV-N - - - N41 raffia UN - I ~ - . y ~ 6 ~ _ _ _ 752 IV-G \J N31 0` ~ on UP to m ~ Y 753 IV-0 - - - U ~ 33 NIT N-6 ®0 I UNR N A 7rr y 77g UNIT I I ~ 7 4 IV-R - - - I un. 5 775 m m I 4 UNIT lV D 5 5 ® I ® 755 IV-M - - - 49 m n 5 S ~ N51 _ O 772 IV-F - - - m 1 5 t,~t ~ V_ _ _ - m ~ 5 Q UNIT N R 773 I D . UNIT N R W 754 754 _ ~ ~ LL 774 IV-D - - ~ . _ _ - E- ~ ~ ~ yy~ 775 IV C - t Z ~ ~V U S~ - - W e ~ ~K ~ 776 IV-C - • 183'-II' - z 777 IV-B - - - f D - z ~ 0. ~ _ - H ® I II II 778 IV-B - - ti I 11 II W m W UNDO _ ~ D 779 IV-A - - ~ 753 a ~ p ~ - - - 7so Iv-a OM a ypp W r - ® I m • ~ ~ ~r ~ Q • UNIT N-G 752 UNIT N-G 0 I m ~ N ~Q 752 ~P - ~ ~ I ~ ~ B g ~ ~m s ~ ° ? I I ~ - - --H---~--~--~---~ - - m - OCapyri~l•91rmmDeal011wodaem,PA I I M~• ~ - II UN N 71~mr,rlrr,~tod~.rY.popo~gr m N ~ I I 751 dGl~amD~Amo~,PA. I i AeluodudmhMho~ainperbk I I ~idj'pah6ladW~haktlNplbfwtl~n til pMmkdaldGrrumDeel0lAeeotJalee, ~'1 PAeldelry,mchnpodudaimey I I abjxtyoubdrl~dlact~dnr~lly I i I+tldtfiM017of00Uid6Bd81if~COdO. i UNIT IV-C 722 UNIT IV-G a 722 0 I U ~ 1 ~ - _ 1 II II Q I I A z 0 a I a ~ o J 123'-~' i ~ U. o ? Q. s~ ~ ® Q I QL 3 ® Ill St U b U] NIT IV I s1 U s1 1 720 UNIT IV R g se ~ ~ 720 w ~ 1a 1 ss 53 0 1a ~q 1 ~ Y ~ n .Na ~ o m ~ ~ ~ UNIT IV D ~ 2 S5 S6 57 710 ® o W Z UNIT IV C .UNR -D m m o I ~ 0.y N I ? ~ } UNIT N A 708 708 702 UNIT IV B W 704 ~ O _ I J ® O ~ ~ ~ ab . 1 Q ~ ON ® ~ S31 S3 39 ~ S2 ® o _ ® ® 3 UNll:~l- I- ~ ~ 7 r o • ~ ~ ~ I m z 11• n ~ ; m_ A 1 1 A/~1 V V II 30 Avil ~ I ¦ J I 1 w w I ~sY ~5 I ? o 0 IL3 - ? o a o ~..4. - - r~:~ res. - - `r ? O 549 Q w F-1 !703 r(D FV. d1 Na UNIT N A U701 UNIT N-C 0 R 1 N if m m 705 s5 UNIT IV -D GREGG HOLD5WORTH s5s s6, UNIT IV D s5s d 709 0 LICENSE NO. 707 S S68 S69 AR 0017669 S6. S6 563. O O r ss UNIT N-F UNIT N-F S6 711 s„ 711 a S73 Z - - - - - _ - - - O. I ao 326'-T I THOMA5I GRAHAM UCEN5E N0. A CPI I AA 0000752 P 2015 05-42 P NN E M C 71 A 7TH LEVEL MASTER PLAN 1 MME 1/18'_ - fi,-V . 106 Q 0 DATE DRAWN CHECKED O Z itfOS'OS MAWIMS TJS i O ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ 'Q •m~ y ~ ~ COC .0 t0 ~ H Y 7 N 8TH LEVEL ~ ~ m ~ c 3~~'-3 ~ c.cc UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRUUMS BATHS SHEET REF, m w = ca m wcw~'ic m $ ,mom 801 IV-A - - - ~ o o a 0 c'o~c'~, .N ~ C ~ N A 802 IV-A - - - ~ $ c3 $ 286''11" I ~ p N .u N M 803 IV-B - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •3,~w y m c~ 804 IV-B - - - ~ $ N E~ o ~ c 805 IV-C - - - ~ i ~ 3 ~ , 1 ~ ~ c ~ ® ~ _ v Na UNI1 O N7 N UNIT IV F _ _ - ~ ~ > ~ 806 IV-C $ .y m ~ $r Nt1 O 4 $72 . c ~ 3 N3 N4 r. r. 807 IV-D - ~ . ~ p N2 ~ NS NIT N D c~c_~ N c ~ U N,6 874 UNIT -C a m 808 IV-D - - - m $ c ~ o. ;a _ 876 0 UNIT N A UNIT IV B ~ . 88~ H9 ~ ~ 0 809 IV-D - m c o c ~ 0 a$~m~ 9U " 878 . i _ ~ C NJyO c 1 _j 810 IV-D - - $ W ~ m ~ NI 2 I 0 O ® - Op.. - e 811 IV-F - - - Z a ~ P ~ , m um - a ~ ~ •o •c d~ Im - m I I co c m I I a I 820 IV R = m ~'c3 aa~ O ? a ~ m 0 M ~ v ~ - - - - - 8z1 IV-M - - - t $ ~ c - - - - - - - - - - H ~ c 'a 0 0 e .G ~ t0 'y 'C 822 IV-G - - - s ~ ~ •E ~ a ~ _ ~.1 ? _ M , lUl 0 ? ~ ® I 0 I I- t0 'm '.mt' Vp V 1 ~F~ I I ~ V 3 I I I M 1 I 823 IV-0 - - - ® I' ® I m. ~ ~ I I I N41 ~ . I ~ ~ ' ~ 0 U +e T _ 851 - - - - I ~ ¦ N31 0 r O } '.J ON a I UP 1 I I ' I I I I I _ I I 852 IV-G - - - m~' W ® ~ UNIT N-B ° I a I ~®o - UNIT N A 877 II I 879 UNIT N I I m, 853 ~ IV-D - - - ~ti I I I ~~VVN~ 875 ~ ~ ii 4 UNIT IV-D ® I I I A ? ~ - - CC I - 854, IV-R - 4 873 m 5 N51 ~ 5 9 ~ - - - 855 IV M - 0 N5 5 m ® - _ ~ 5 Q UI 872 IV-F - y ~ D UNIT N R W . ~ z ~ 873 IV-D - - - ~ m u-. ~ ~ ~ 874 IV-D - - - ~ I- - ~ m m ~ Z ~m 0 ~ N a p~ 875 IV-C - - ~ 0 ~ .T.i+ 183'-II' iTwv - - - - 876 IV C D _ - Z . d. ~ e I II II 877 IV-B - - - I II II ~ ~ N ® - W ~C - p _ _ _ W ~ u 878 IV B - ~ 0 ~ a t~ a ~ 879 IV-A - - - ~ 0 Q V G ~ T ® I 0 m ~w _ 880 IV-A - - ~ ~ H Q ~ UNI1 UNIT N G 0 I m ~ ~ ~ 81 852 t7 Q ~ - - ~ I B B m _ _ _ ~ ~ - •co~nc-t~nemo~lynaesadem~,a.~ UN . .N ate. nlbba,a~m~ea~y 0 ~ j ao~alloa~nA~ocbt~,a~. Reprodudkn E1>rhOie a b pub b ~ - • ~YPwidlarttlleptbrw~len F ~uc9onbb 0 a~ ~ albJedyabdrBadkrrrY~~ibhBiry uldxlMb fl dtl~e Uolbd Sbbe Code. I U UNIT N G 822 .r I 123'-1' t ~ P ® - !7 1 II II ® I II II G _ _ ~ Q Q Ia• ~ ~ LL A ? Q- d ® ~ w @ Q tL/ 3 m >~Ir LL1 1-- J - ~ V 13.:. Q UI St UNIT N-R a - ~ g S1 $20 o ~ ~ W O S9 514 1 S3 S4 $14 ~ x, 0 F ~ ~ ss ss UNIT IV D , . . s s~ ® ® 11.1 z 810 UNIT -D m ~ ~ I I Q ~ 'p ~ ? ~ ~ v, UNIT IV C UNIT IV A 608 ~ I ~ ~ w I ~ 2 UNIT IV•B 84 s2s _ -1 ~I = ~ ; . I ~ 2 I ;z J ® O - I II il. ~ ~ ~ Ub i $24 . ~ ~ SJi I II II 52 ~ / t / I S39 - ~ O - 1 U dr Q ~ I I I I 821 00 0 ~ , Z ~ s2 ® ~ i V V a I d ~ 62 I 1 w _J - L a J 0 A A A ? ~ . 96 -rL - - 0 - - - - - iA.B. S49 a 54. w - ? _ O 0 w I I II b a 46. 1 0 I I. ~ I ~ S43 - I S41 ~ R, 0 NA J Na d~ . UNIT N B a m m . UNIT IV A 801 UNIT IV-C: mo 5 UNIT IV UNIT IV D 60 S6 808 GREGG HOLDSWORTH LICENSE NO. S 59 D AR 0017668 ® S6 S6 S S6 spa s UNIT UNIT IV -F sr) 81' Q 811 Q S7 S7 C z 0 316'-1' THOMAS J. GRAHAM Inc 11 LICENSE NO. AA 0000752 N( V0 0 PL kN Nil IG DD1 05-42 7 r I C 'C F GE F ! CE 8TH LEVEL MASTER PLAN A 1 , Q 107 G DATE DRAWN CHECKED O Z limm NAWIJDS TJG o ~ ~o w c~~o a~ 3 m= .v o cu p ~ ~ Y ~ t=A C C1 ~ C .3 ~ N ?r 9TH LEVEL ~ ~ ~ ~ o UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRDUMS BATHS SHEET REF, m ~ ` ~ ~ o~ o c 2Z5'-1° 901 IV-A - 'y ~ ~ o 7 p ~ Qy C (~4~ 3 V A A - ~ O N 902 IV-A - - r!1 y ~ ~Cl U 903 IV-B - - - ~ " ~ ~ as a~ ~ v ~ ~ w _ c o~ o ~ 904 IV-B - - o " c °~im~~'3 _ ~ o 1 ' 13 1 _ - ~ 905 IV C - ~ d ~ c Ns UNIT N-F ~ ~ $'rn~ c~ N N 906 IV-C - - - - ~ H 3 s= 8~3 I I N11 972 I 14 ca='~o~ _ _ c~o~~ N3 I I ~ N4 a I I 907 IV-D - v w c ~ I ' UNIT IV-D NS I I o~~ c - - -~c~~ Nz ~ 974 16 s' UNIT I C - ; m _ 908 IV-D m ; '8 ca. 976 ' m ~ o UNIT N A V-B I ~ - 4 UNIT I Z , I 909 IV-D ~ `o u, o c $~Ev~m 980 a na 9u - I 978 , - ~ - I , I I 910 IV-D O H ~ .~.c 01 I I 1 - I I _ ® N20 N21 - I O . I I e----~ A Z ~S 01 _ II ' I 911 IV-F ea a _g' ~ccom~ 17 ® II - ~ II I e a fl,a~ I I I 1 ~ I r 912 IV-F - - - '3 'c ~ m a ~ar~s~cs .orvi~ c 1 0 ? p _ _ =oL~•a 971 IV-F - ~ c ca •a A 0 Im~~-a' - - - - - - ~ L - ~ - - - - . - - - - .os. v p ee ? 972 IV-F - - - -l N , ~ ~ ~ ? 0 I I I 1 II ~ II II . nmvoavrFear c Pimvroeua'PERr 973 IV-D - - - N41 0 I I - I 4 ~ ~ B~ ~ I I I I I i N41 30 ,r , , , . I ~ ~ = II I 0 974 IV-D - - - r~ I INNDAI' ~ 0 3 - o _ma N31 0 ..i ~ ov uP a-r. ~ a iM - 975 IV-C - - 3 W ~ 1 ~K.. ~ U -B > 976 IV-C - - - '~ifir CC UNIT IV A NIT Nom. U . 979 975 ~ r 4 UNIT N D ~ _ _ _ 977 IV-B 4s .,w 973 H - - _ ~ 50 N51 pr~vicEVrPERr a FrowDevrwzr 978 IV B - ~ r. O , 55 euTM 7 ~7'.'Hr 5 m UN -F _ _ - W 979 IV-A ~ ~ ~ PROUD 97t ~w RC{JII@ nvonDe air TD wTaN ~ LL aeyt m ~rw R urPERretaPE ; 3 - ~ 980 I ~ ~ x Z z ~ W Z PavnDe yr PER r e PP7ND6 u . 0. ~ ~ Z P ~ Q PFITAD6 W' PER r ~ r/ N N o W 225'' 1' a W...~ ~ o ~ ~ Y ~ a ~ LL o a ~ ~ m _ _ ~ ~ 0 L ~ ~ Q 3 y .1 ~ p ~ ~a . PRO/Dfi Vr PER f ~ PRO/mi Ur fS~R I' P+arwo~ ur PsR r c PRance yr PeRr v: ~S L M i a I i rRDVbtaar~rTOOeraN ~onEl®vr PaQ r daPS ®CoPN4fd•~ ~algnAaeademe, PA - - - • • - - W rl~ roamed. ~y - _ ~.c lAbmal~IbtlieexdgAepOpergt ~ ~ C arOreromoesipn~aaod~ae,Pa. Aegodudiaibxtalaarinpedelt a~ar~n~aaw~,armep~orw ver~era,aco~~aao, PA end eny ouch repraducdai mey eubJedyeu b diA arbiorcdmhrei IIOaNy PRDVID! VP FEI! f C PRDJIDE I!4' PER I' . PRwaM yr Pee r nrovix w' Poe r ulderiNb 11ddk UidbdSgbeCode. ~'li~GH~'- i a ' - sK pp~~ C a C ti Q . z o ' PROk'I ur PROaIDE ur PER r nrrwx yr PeR T neanDe yr Pee r 0 - a _t iL 765'-3' r ~ d -f ~ ~ Q ~ 3 ao' a u.J J V S1 g - ~ UNL .AI-F 4" ~ A S1 R S11 © avai DE CPoQCET TOODTAN IaAED Va' PER I' aLOPe 1 ~ SV ~i PI09v1DC Vr PCR r 0 Pl~?dn Vr PER r Q O S14 15 J ~ S4 0 10 ~p~( T1iHI z sz ~ s5 UNIT N-D " Q ss s7 } 0 sia UNIT -D m ~ W UNIT N-C UNIT IV A 908 ~ 906 b Y 902 U B v~ zs ~ , ~y 3~« ~Syi~kK ~ z ~K 1 $3 ON glGBl PUII ' S24 ~ ` ~ S31 - m ~ - e Z I i ® V V I I' I iGrdi~ FRONxVI'RR11 C nmvmEVCP"r Lu ID L ~TM m ?o i .rrr 3 ~1 ~ < I -tea 5 I I I ~ J l 0 A 0 0 106' 8' - - - - - - - - L0.3: S4 er ? Q B 42 ~ ~ ? O I i I II C . Q ~ S4 ® 0 - 5 © 544 C S41 _ ® I J~~f J „ I I a I - C an UNIT IV-B O ea S45 UNIT IV-Al . 903 I @ GREGG HOLDSWORTH 901 UNIT IV-C ' LICENSE NO. 905 UNIT N-D 57 UNIT IV -D AR 0017669 S55 559 6 561 909 ® 907 - - Q r _ 6 S $6 ® ® 1,53 S74 S6 S6 UNIT IV -F 567 911 - N' 571 g S73 S/3 Z O vt THOMAS I GRAHAM UCEN5E NO. AA 0000752 D A4 0 8 2 05 P LM IA I E ATE T CI 9TH LEVEL MASTER PLAN 1 1Iif'=1-W uml a 108 0 DATE DRAWN CHECKED O Z limn MAWAD9 TJQ - 0 ~~s~ a ~ ~ m 0'~3`~~ 10TH LEVEL o ~ C ~ C c UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRD~MS BATHS SHEET REF, 3 ~ 3 3 a~= c.°c ~ Z2~'-1' N.C ~ N 1001 IV-A - - - ~ c w c m8o~~ ~ a~, ~ c 1002 IV-A - - - c ~ Q' A ~~c~ - - c $ ~ 1003 IV-B - - ~N~~ - _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1004 IV-B •3 ~ cu c~a~a~c~ - - $N 1005 IV-C - c ~ c a o ~ c 2, 3 ~ 13 UNIT IV E 13 14 V_ - - - 3L ~ p ~ I C 1006 L_ ~,v UNIT IV F NB N7 , " 1072 ~.8>8~ 1072 _ _ 8 'N ~ ~ N11 4 .c may; 4 1007 IV D - - I N3 o r $$=~~n _ o=~mc'~ I N4 I I UNIT IVD 1008 ~ IV-D - - c ~ N2 N5 0 1074 ~~g~~ m8 UNIT I -C m . 1009 IV-D - ~ c a 107 ~ 0 UNIT IV-A 5 UNIT N B ~ 2 - m 3 ;c3 R 1080 = K 1078 - - ~ c ° ~ ~ 1010 IV-D - a $ N ~ ~ `o ° c ~ _ ~ i I \ a ~ $ E~ 1 o ® I ® i ~j2~p N2 ® _ 1011 IV-F - - - F. ~ i~% ' m . ~ ~ ~ - A O N ~ ~ _ Zm~a~ i I ~ I ~ ~ I I II .1012 IV-F - - n •a -o ~ I i' ~ 1 I wa~~~a - - c °-''c O 0 ? ~ ? 1071 IV-F - ~ a a a ~ 'c Ema a ~ rn N27 111'-4' - - _ _ - - - - - - _ .a .cu~8 c .30~~.~ i 0 0 Q - - - 1072. IV-F - - C - H a ~ - ? _ ~ ~ ~ C 1073 IV-D - - ~ a~ W 'w ti w ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ I 0" ~u {0 N41 _ _ _ 1074 IV-D 3 I ~ ~ ~ I ® ~ - 0 . 1075 IV-C - . N31 J ON ~ ~w 3 r ~ I 3 1076 IV-C - - ~ UNCfaIV B UNIT N A DTI UNIT IV ~ . 1079 1075 m 1077 IV-B - - ~ a UNIT N D yM1~WI Ni'. WIC CC Hf. RI Na I I N5 1073 I 3y'ua, 7T~r 1078 IV-B - - - 150 5 1 5 g ®eaH 1079 IV-A - - - m ® sr: re s7 ~ UN -F ~ 1071 UN -F _ ~ V-A - - as 1080 I W 101 ~ m. ~ ~ W Z ~ W Z s F- ~ t9 Z . y ~ ~ W ~ W ~ 0 ~ . t~ a D a m o~ Q y Q V N c~ 0 ~5 B e B - - - OOopyAgh! • Gran Deem Auodebe, PA NAphro~eeered. Thb mebrW b q~e e~ualre piepeiy d Qum DeeE,~ Aeeodeba PA, Hepoduc0on hwhdearlnpabb ~b Pm?plbd wihart tl~e pbr edtlen pemdssiandQelrem Dea~As,edebe, PA end any wdi ?epradudkn mey su6Jed you b duo andlor ahdnd Ibex mdr i19e 17 d tlN Udbd Sbh~ Cade. MhM c7 z Q ~ ° a o [L a~ OL ~ W ~ st v7 r ~ UNI'~!J(-F 51 ~ 1UtG UNI'~!J(-F 1~2 ~ g 511 , S8 ~ o W f 0 V ~ ~ S9 St0 t 15 I S3 S4 H. I I fit' 0 52 II S5 ~ . 2 Q S, UNIT IVD atl z 1010 UNIT I -D ~ p O UNR IVA UNR IVC 100 W 1002 UNIT IVB 1006 J 1 ~ ~ I ~ s2 ~ --i off a 0 53 .M i O ~ ~ 0 rn~i - 1 --J A m ~ I i ~ ~ ~ O i Wf191 ~ ~ 1 21 I a Fn ~ - I ~ ww n at I m~ ~Ha I Q ~ I ?0 I S25 I _ I O I i a ? o - - - - - ? 0 ros. sas E) - ? - r a i a , w a o ? ~ I o,o I I ~ ~ ~ II m I I m } a sat \ J p i I i o . o UNIT IV B 0 UNIT IV-A 1003 I d0 d 1001 AR UNIT IVC m:m 1005 57 UNIT IV -D UNIT IV-D GREGG HOLD5WORTH ss 59 s6o s6t 1009 I a .1007 LICENSE NO. AR 00 f 7GG9 1556. 6 S68 S69 O O 5 5 70 UNIT IV-F UNIT IV- ss6 6 1011 1011 sit s~ S7 73 0 ~~`~Iilly 55 . 9 j i i THOMAS I GRAHAM LICEN5E NO. A4 AA 0000752 265'-3' 5 - 82 0 05-42 P~ ~ D PLAN. W 1 sT 10TH LEVEL MASTER A W. a 109 a. DATE DRANRJ CHECKED O Z IIAM MAWIJDS 730 o G a~L ~ 'p ~ ~ m y~ w 3 ~ n N ~ C ~ t C = Y V W ~O~'~•aa ~ 21T,8~ 11TH LEVEL N ~ N ~ ~ L C ~ :a OI"~ ~ ~ O A UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDROGMS BATHS SHEET REF, c .o a ~ - m~ o~ 7 ~ v y 1 IV-E - - - c a $ o ~ 110 . N N ~I~ ~ 1103 IV-B - - - c E ~ ~,2 E N - - ~ ~ ~ ~ rr 1104 IV-B - ~ of ~ o m f Y. O N WI C I Ni Ni ~ Nl 1105 IV-C - - - ~ N8 ~ s ~ . ~O~; ~ N7 N O 10 N11 V_ - - - C?•H~ c~ 1106 I C M M ~g_E~ N4 t ~ v-D - - - ~ _ ~ 1107 I o_ ~ NZ N5 O 'gaoc~$ - `om - I ~ UNIT I C 1108 IV-D - - ~a c 117 I _ t`! I I I a; ~ o %a UNIT N B NZ I UNIT IV H 1178 ~ I p z3 M M 1109 IV-H - - - c ~ E °•$y~~° 1174 0----- I , I®\J m ' l D E~ ~ o c II v ® NZ1 _ Q ____J I - - - $ co 1110 IVQ ~ ® o • p - ~ - 0 0 O p .r a~ ' m I II Z II _ _ Z~oO~ 1173 IV-G - ~ ~ a m ; II ~co'o ~ c m ~ 1 I e I w D ~ Q - - - - ~ C ~ N C ' 1174 . ',c3 ~ 'ca a ~ I ~ Q aoEma IZ8'•0' - - - - - - ~ ~ $ ~ c - - 1175 IV-C ~ L ~ ~ I c o (Q B ~ ~ ~g ~c-E 1176 IV-C - - - ~ E ~ `o o ~n w- 3 II 41 ~ I ~ I I w. © - - a 1177 IV-B - --~a UNITIVE ® - ® - I N 1180 3 I on • ~ I I.: ur 1178 IV-B - - - . r I I . - 3 I so- sa ~ ~ ~ t01Q UNIT IV•B ' 1180 IV-E - - - t177 UNIT N 1175 UNIT N G 5 1173 as N51 58 g re ,.y 5 5 a m~ ~h 5 ~ . 1 Z NU 1 ~ ~ z „ ,w ~ ~ a W W p N ~ a~ ? a V m = 0 ~ ~ y N V .5 ~ B B s O Cappiplt • t~drm Deaf Aaaoades, PA N~dtnroxwd, ThMnbtlroeadwMpop~y dGmhem Da~pnkaeodalee, PA Reproddidi 6 whale a ~ prb k aMkP/ pohbi6ed w~qutthe pbt w~11len pam~andC§ehem Da~piA~odaoae, PA and any eud~ reprod~bn melt aub~od ya b dv1 a~'a oinNW 1edUy under THe 1~ dthe United 31ei~ Cade. ti Q 0 J J ~ F~ a QL 3 U.1 517 L J f V{~ ma ~M. sT:1! ~M. nn f=1 vJ 511 CJ g S5 ~ 0 S4 5g 10 S14 St O ~ u N S2 S5 S6 moan ~ ~ ~tl 0 S7 O O aa~ a~ IT N Q ammo, ~ Z arm U IT N-C UNIT -D m 1106 110 1110 NB UNIT szs I , a w 1104 ; I • . _ _ b 6 :.I a-~a-.• I ~b • 531 ~ " I j vu UNITIVE ~ o m I . 3 • 3 I 1101 ~ ® ~~m 4- m ~ 0 A O ~ O I I I - ~ 2 ~ .n. G M, to ~D' ~ 1107 ' ~ 128'•0' no 9 `m ® m 1 m - 0 0 ® Q ea 54 ¦ 12301 s I J ( d I M ~ O C ss1 Na UNIT IV B O UNIT IV -H , 1103 1109 UNIT N-C m - 1105 UNIT IV-Dl 59 ~p S61 $ O GREGG HOLD5WORTH LICENSE NO. li L S64 S65 $g S69 AR 00! 7GG9 O O S6 S71 72 72 N - - z 0 co ORIGINA THOMAS J. GRAHAM A AA C000752 157'-4' AND UCEN5E NO. 5 N 20 I DPR 14 05-42 p T E I F L W TE T 11TH LEVEL MASTER PLAN 1 1116' =1'-0' w Q 11.0 0 DATE DRAWN CHECKED . . 0 Z limm NAWIIDS TJG - c ~ p~ m N C ~ ~ 7 'O m W ~ O ~ 12TH LEVEL N N ~ ~ r Y . N C +'S m C C 3~, 3 zn~-a' UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRDUMS BATHS SHEET REF, ~ ~,2. = c t N t0 N N fA G fA t''''7 ~ A ~ 1201 IV-E - - - m$o°=~ ~o~°o c ~ cv 1203 IV-B - - - 'y E c m a ~ v N 1204 IV-B - - - ' N ~ ~ ~E rcmE•~a 1205 IV-C E a~ c ~ ~ N N1 C - ~ ~ 1206 IV -C - ~ ~ ~ '3 NS ~o~~ N7 O N11 ~ 1207 IV-D - - - ~ m c $ m m - ~ N4 UNIT IV-H .c•° c•- v, 3 1208 IV-D - - - $ = E N2 N5 1274 m~ c UNIT -C ~ I - - - - -N$-c 1209 IV-H •L m c~ $ x 127 : I - I > ~~°=c ca ua UNIT IV B ~ I I 9~ : 1278 . I 23 .W I ~ IV-Q - - - c 1210 .d•~3aca ~ ~ m c o - •cc€ f N m~° m N20 N21 1273 IV-Q - - - E `o N ~ c - m a ? E !-E°'• ~ I r 1 ~ ~ NZ 1274 IV-H - - - ~ ~ y •-,-c 9 Z . m a 1 I s, M .J ~ D 1275 IV C - - ~ e ~ c _ _ _ _ _ _ I 13 '-8' - 2 - - ~~~mC$. ~ ~ aaz~ - ~ ~ , ~ I o. - - - - - - - - - - 1276 IV-C - - - E m a W 0 ~ ~ - ~ ErH$$c ® I 1 77 IV-B - - - m a g id 'N •e 2 = a .~m•EE~ II N35 ~ , I I Q ~ - ~ a - _ ~ 1278 IV -B - - UNITIVE ~ 34 ~ ® 3 I N 1280 m I ' ou J I : u~ I? 1280 IV-E - - - 3 w UNIT N B e~~ 1277 UNIT IV UNIT IV Q 1275 ~ 1273 5 4 - ~ . 9 CC N51 58 59 56 . m~ 5 r. W 3~ m Z m~ NV W Z. O ¦ Z ~ ~ o W W ~ Q F' ~ c~ a a m = 0 to O N c~ a C u• e D ~ B M n OCapjrti~t• Graham Deagn Aaaodmae, PA a~am~naa 'lltla ma6a~d ~ b ezduthe Pmp~ty a(Gmdem 0eagn Aeeodaree, PA. Repiadudbn h xlale a p~ pnb b ahk9ypmHdhadwdfaultliapbrw~ea pamlalon of Grehom 0~ Anodebe, PA and enyaud~ roptodudlm may tubJad you to dA andkr akntiad Bey undarTNNlJattheUnMed3ldeaCada. M Q Q LL W H QL a s 17 W p~ mm 77~a °`a" ~ ~ S13 . O wx S8 ' J 14 ~ g 54 9 S i a 894 ~ W . U 52 - S5 S6 ~ 7 N O ~w* . NIT I IV-Q 0 UNIT IV-C 120 1210 z > } p 1206 UNIT N B 5z9 , N 1204 W _ ~ I S26 ~ - O ~ I ox w?aar vuan UNIT N.E m s3, I 52 ® - I ~ S39 1201 m m ~ ~ N r G1 523. • I I I AAlll ® ~ tl1 H II S30 j ~w* ~ O I? N o z 61 " U i - - - - I - - - - - - ~'-8` - - - - - - ws. 349 I - o m ~ I® m 4 C a o s m . J a u I Q r s5, C D , IV-Bj 14 AJ 1203 UNIT IV-H , 1209 I UNIT N , 1205 4 - UNIT IV -D sfi, s55 © 1247 S6 S64 565 $6 S69 O Q S GREGG HOLDSWORTH LICENSE NO. s S6 AR 0017669 S6 S6 S71 7 z R ` it I I A A4 EC d fl:l : ) THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000752 2s1'-4' Nip 00 N DPRM T 05-42 P 12TH LEVEL MASTER PLAN FL T 1/15=1-0' A w Q 0 DATE DRAWN CHECKED O Z It= MAUDS TA O 'a ~ m ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ 0'~3~'- ..,~oo~ 14TH LEVEL ~ Y ~ N _csj3o~° •3~ w - 3 DROGMS BATHS SHEET R F, ~ ° UNIT UNIT TYPE BE E .o ~,2 ~ ~ y Zi7'-S' 1401 IV-E - - - $ `o m ~ ° ~ ° o - - c ~ a, V-B - - - ~ c ~ 1403 I ~ $ ~ A c • w.«. 1404 IV-B - - - ~ y ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ -a,:.ym 1405 IV-G - - - 3 ~ ~ S ~ as • $vi ° doom - - - 1406 IV-C $ ~ Z, 3 2~ c tNII~ r+ L - N 1407 IV-D - - - ~ ,a ~ ~ c 'vs c N8 N7 N _ _ .~>,y3 O N11 2 1408 IV-D - ~ $ . ~ =~m~ ~ ~ ~ N4 N2 - N5 • 1409 IV-H - - - `o N g m ° _ Lom$ ~~~c O ° c~ 4 IV-Q - - ~ - ~ 110 a;.~33~a t UNIT I -C - a~~L~E 147 ' I UNIT IV B , ~ I a$ w 1473 IV-Q - - - ~ c 90 " 1478 .UNIT 111 H a I O t 1474 co ° O H m m V-H - - - O ~a r 1474 I 0 U120~ N21 Zak°~ . a ~ 0 m I I - - - - m m 'a 1475 IV-C ~ ~ ~ c,, a - m ~ ~ a~ c = m •c ~ ~ aa~ t I _ > 1476 IV-C - - - ~ n. ~ m W.~ N ~ ~ C v ~ ° 't5 I 2 - - 149 -4 - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - tAS. 3 - . - - - - - - - - 1477 IV-B - - - ~ c 1° y 'o, ~ i ~yy ~ ~ ~ C~ tb N aJ 1478 IV-B - - - 35 ~ 40 no 1480 IV-E - - - 30 @ I I 3 0 a ~ UNIT IV-E o o 0 ® I: N 1480 0 I oN J ~ I ~ UP ~T 33 3 ~ M UNIT N-B I 1477 ' - hn NN UNIT N ~ UNIT IV Q 1473 1475 C.~`i • N4 _ N51 5 59 m ~_e+~ m 55 56 M 5 •p 'O m 01 x.. ,.fl . ~ C +.o ~ ~ ~V z S 1 ¦ ,,,,jj,~ ~~,,jj~~ ~ ~ e~3 i~3 Z ~ N~. O ti W ~ W ~ t~ a o a m o~ ~ Q N Q N c , e ~G e B B - OfaDpyApM•Ch~Del~AeOOd~,PA ~ N~phbroaned, ~ N 1Hi mehrhl h the e~Na props d Q~ham Dergi Aeeodabe, PA. Repadudlon h wide a h peAe Y ~trldly poh6kd wl9qut tlm p~br w~1 paml~ndC~drenDe~A, PAedenye~xh~eproduc9on~y 1dJedyou b dY9ltdlottml 1hh911y u~rTIN 1i dIM UrOtd S1e0~ fem. ti Z a 0 ~ a ~ ° d jL/ a LU • b i Si g ~ W S11 S1 - ~ SB Si ~ O i 54 Sg 1~ Sts -1 0 s O 10 w Z 52 , 55 S6 ~ S } o UNIT IV-Q UNIT i •p ~ ~ - UNIT IV C 1410 14 1406 UNIT IY B ~ ~ 1404 :I s2 : I I - - ~ ~ 53 k i .i opt ae UNIT N E m I ~ 36 ~ ~ 1401 m p ~ ~ 3B S39 'C~' 0 r. ~ Z J ky~l BSI v v LLI 1144. U ® s 30 I I a • El ? - E3 0 e O u0 I OL 149'-4' \jr I o 349 - ? - a a O O El I' I 0 b I I I , C 6V 4 ® m J O C do I „a UNIT IV-B 0 , O UNIT IV-H 351 1403 1409 UNIT IV-C m - 1405 GREGG HOLD5WORTH UNIT IV -D S59 S6 LICEN5E NO. AR 0017669 ® 1407 Q a S63 64 565 S68 S6 a 3 0 s 370 S66 67 S71 7 Z F' ! li d n R~6 G I~ ~I i THOMAS I GRAHAM E 4' X LICENSE NO. AA 0000752 A • 251'-4" V 0 20 NI D P RT NT T I F L W 1 ER A 14TH LEVEL MASTER PLAN 1116" w Q 112 v DATE DRAWN CHECKED O Z 11108105 MAWJDS TJG 0 ~ m N C V ~ 'O y ~ .a VJ 3 ~ c y y C ~ L C ~ Y V y 15TH LEVEL ~ ~ ~ ~~~-3 21~'-S' UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRUUMS BATHS SHEET REF, ~ c r o c a~ ~~o r S o 1501 IV-E - - - ~ ° ~ Q. o c _ C L y A 1503 IV-B - - - ~ Q $ ~ c~ - m `o~; m V- - - - ~ o"E 1504 I B ~EE2 ~od~~ 1505 IV-C - - - v E ~ w ~ dog o ~ .w c 1506 IV-C - ~ ra a H ` ~ N8 N c ~ ~ ~ 1507 IV-D - - - c~ i N7 , 0 i N71 i 2 v~i,w3 v2 ~$-E i ~ N4 ~ - - - - ~ as 1508 IV-D ii ii c~ c'C¢ ~ ~ _ ~ c N2 I N5 - ii _ _ ~m~8 1509 IV-H - o ~ ~ UNIT I C; ; I - tS~~o ai~ 3'x•0 157 ' ~ ' ~ V-H I UNIT I I Na ~ UNIT 111 B ~ 1574 23 1510 IV-Q - - - w ~ ~ 0 ~ G.$ y ~prQ 1578 ~ ~ I C y ~ C O m 1573 IV-Q - - - $ W E ~ m HEM m 1 s ~ 2 21 ® ~ m ® ~ e - 1574 IV-H - - - Z a~ ~ ° ~ a y I I ® ~ 26 m~c•°c . 4 D 1575 IV-C ~ c a~ •a ~ ~ d 3 •a o E a 1 I ' m - - o ? ? 0 2 - - - ~ _ 1576 IV-C r y $ ~ - 0~ - - - - - - - - TAS. 3 ~ I o 0 ;o ~ a o _ 77 IV-B - - - ~mEE~ 15 f- ev co "w ~ a ~ o ® 35 ~ „ ~ 4 1578 IV-B - - - 4 N41 p ~ I ~ : ; 1 39 ~ ~ .UNIT N E m . ' 34 . ' 1 © ; 1580 _ m 3s 1580 IV- - - - •J I ~ UP I ~r ® I UNIT N-B I 1577 ; ~ NIT IV . , UNIT N-C ~ ~ U Q I 1575 ; ; 1573 h 1~ it I 5 i' _ 49 I i i I I ~ I ' I ~ c~ I 51 ~ 10 n•, N5$ $ ~ a - 5 W ~ m, ~ _ Z°~ N C~ W • 1 ¦ Z ~ ~ H W ~ W p H ~ c~ a LL D a m = 00 ~ ~ N Q .s V C ~ B ~ _ B N N ~ - - - OCoppidtl•(~hamD~IpnJlmoda~e,PA ~ - hl QI a~gma~ea. Thbmel~lelbtliee~lus~epiopmq N dQehem Oeeipn Aeeode~s, P,A. Mw1~eaMpeNb at~y prolfIDibd w~tladthe pfior wren pxndadan d fvrahrn Dew Aeaodebe, PA 9nd enp e~h reproduaon mey' ebf ed you b tM endla c8nYa11~6Bly uderTNkITdIMUnhdSldeaCode, • ~ p. a 0 ~ LL ~ ~ a W J' 1 • ~ U rn ~ g S11 S13 O W i 14 I m V I S4 i ~p S15 I I ~ I J i ~ I a~S I I S2 I SS I S6 $7 i ~-J Z 0 O I I ii UNIT I -D UNIT N-Q N I I UNIT IV-C; ; I ~ 1 1510 w a ' UNIT IV B ! 1506 I I szs ~ b ~ I 1504 I I , 52 I I 1 n ' . I ~ S3 I ou UNIT N-E ~ I o _ 1 ; sae .a sus ; ~ 1, 1 1 m ~ 50 m . m m ~ I I. ~ ~ Q - z !i ~ , m I] i II _ I ~ o a 160'•0' OL - ' - - - - - - - - - - LOS. - - - - - - - a S49 I o 0 s oo ? ? _ o I IF 71 0 m m I _ I I I~ m p p ee 3 S44 0 O J an V H S51 HQ UNIT IV B UNIT I O 1503 d 1509 I UNIT B m~ - . 1505 UNIT N-D GREGG HOLD5WORTH LICENSE NO. sss ss5 ~ ~ 1507 AR 0017G69 564 6 69 S 0 S70 ss S6 56 56 SCI 7 7 N o IN-Al Kil or _ THOMAS I GRAHAM EC LICENSE NO. AA C000752 A a moo 251'-4' 0o V ElRUM 05-42 p NI 15TH LEVEL MASTER PLAN 1 , iJ16° =1-0' a 113 v DATE DRAWN CHECKED O z ttww YAw/JDS TJG ` o ~ ~ ® U~J C ~ U 3 'd ~ ~ ~ O 3 3 N = .Q O l0 16TH LEVEL ~ y ~ ~ N =~d~c 3•~~-3 ~~_-co UNIT UNIT TYPE BEDRUUMS BATHS SHEET REF, ~o ~ ~ ~ N ~c~~c 2~'i~-s' 1601 IV-E - ~ o ~ a o ca ~ a~, 1603 IV-I ~ $ ~ c , ~ $ 4 IV-I - - - yy~v~ 160 0, E ~ ~ c E 5 IV-J - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 160. ~ $ y cod~o~ O w c 1606 IV-J - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~aN~ L Vl ~ 1675 IV-L - - - ~ > ~ N9 •~nvo c~ c 3 N11 IV-L - - - ~i $ _ 1676 _ m N4 c ~ N6 ~yc° 1677 IV-K - - - ~ ~ o N5 .~~~c ocaa°a 1678 IV-K - - - m 3 ~ ~ N2 UNIT IV-L NO d c o ~ 8$~0~ UNIT IV K ifilfi 1680 ~ IV-E - - - ~ `o ~ y ~ c . 167 ~ $ ~ ~ ~ F- E ~ ~ N I - - - ~ H a 'o ~ z m B ~ - i I ~ i I m c~ a ai ~ ~ - ® ? I ? ~ ~ I P c`o o c c~ - cRm:~ m _ . c ca aa~ I ' • I a ~ E a ~ ~ $ c I 2 _ - - - - ~ ~ a - ~ - - - - - - - - - 170 -8 - - - - - tA,5. 3 I s m E m o (U I { a ~ 1 Q I ® I I ~ ~ N41 ® ~ i 1 ~ ~ I so UNIT IV-E . ......~a ' .J ~ ~ ~i 1680 N I I DN U IT IV K ~ I N m u~ . 1677 UNIT N L , 1675 .r. titi N5 . 5 59 m N li m m V ~ ~ 1 C r r N W 1 Z y N n' W W ~ D N ~ t~ a o a m = 0 Q :gym 0 t~ a t~ W et OMpy~ipM • Gnv~n Desk Aeeodeme, PA fV 111 ~ . ff1 Al~l~dtreaerved. ThY m~arlel q ffie a~aiudre propeAy of (them OeJpn ~ttocmlae, PA. Aepioducdonmwlaleainparb~ ehk8~r pid~ed wYdouttlre pdaw~Men dGwlrem DedgnAeeodetet, P~eny eudi reprodudfa~ mey you m cMi enPa amimi flebiNy ue tt at 9ie Udbd Stelae Cade. M Q C DC 0 LL f1 ~ FW- 4 f'-' J V r W g 0 r w Si 1 15 O st r o~ ~ Z 0 N UNIT IV-J W a m UNIT IV I 529 1606 i~ _ 1604 zs oN s UNITIVE sa 1601 m I : : s a ~ K , S3 F. ® - 9 ~ O o I - Z ~ ~ I a ^ IVE u u i o I 0 I Q -J 0 0 Q ~xv ~ I I - m ? I® A So 4 _ I I do UNIT N-I sas UNIT IV-J NQ O 1603 a 1605 GRIrGG HOLDSWORTH LICENSE NO. sso Q. AR 0017669 $ sa sss ® a 7a ORIGINAL z 0 I I I w THOMAS J. GRAHAM g)j:j"~ E I LICENSE NO. AA 0000752 I NVO 00 151'-55/a' N N EP 'M :NT 05-42 P ~ TR A [F: 16TH LEVEL PENTHOUSE MASTER PLAN 1 114 0 DATE DRAWN CHECKED 11005 MAWADS TJG Z I -LLLJI I _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ......k.. o ~ ~ a~ ~ =~r~ o~ ~ o°~~ ~ rn c~~ Y U N N ~ C U ~ ~ O ~ ~ O 'O O LO N N U N U O m°x_a~a ~ u o . O O s]. ~ U a. O •O ~ L7 ~ C ~ N 3 •3 a ~ ~ C ZS ` 7 U ' O O O a1CN~~~ L L ~ 03 ~ N O ~5 rn Ut ~ N O O 'a ~ O U Q OU ¢ 0 C DECK U t>S N ~ fQ O N sa-0°:1no° C7 ~ ~ O C O •a ~ U si; O N N-C U ~ "O C -a. O U1 ~ N V ~ ~ ~ N U s` =.~C O- C to C (p O L O U ' O N' -^ek ' MASTER PANTRY --i ~ z O ~ ~ O ¦ I U U O O HM I. ~ . ~ Lf C fl- UV1NG BEDROOM U t6 UTILITY' LAUNDRY I ` N O O :c, 3'9'x9s- s~-0^xas- tTCHEN n a v . ~ ~ o FOYER 0 - . _ . ~ - , . - MASTS O ~ ~ c sr'~ - ' .BATH ~ co ~ ~ LAUND YI I D I l 11 ''f ~ Z N L O 'S LAUND YI CLOSET LAUN YI ,1, ~ .r Q. CLOSET r _ UTILITY HM MASTER nrxva• L O ~ N 83'xaa' I I I I BEDROOM ~-c~ " ~ " N to CCf ~ U O W BEDROOM ~ ='J ~ BATH STUDY ~ ~ ~ N ~ Q. _ I I - ,4•.,,-x,7~e BATH I I i~ ~ KLT~CN I 1 7T-00'RS2• I I 1s'4rxtss 11=m~xaa I ir~a•xiaa• I I ~ <a ~ fl- Q ~ 7 I ~ MAS ~o - .DINING ! I I I CLOSET I :r- I BATH r I CLOSET I ~ I ~ ` ,(.1, ~ ~ u a DINING 1 1 O_ I CLOSET I ~ O-~ o t ~ I 440"%afi" l ~ ~ .N V C ~ 22=11 x 11'-0' ~ ' j I T-3'X9zQ' I e I I ~ FOYER I I - ' - I ! t - -ca-;ate' I' k - ~ ,.c I ~ o o ~ i! ~ r- I _ O ~ L - I I ~ In t_ N . o pr 4 , r Q I I ,i: H N tlS m O l -x,3` ~ ~ I I e;} i 4 ~ I KITCHEN . ~ w:'.___.. _ KITCHEN ' ;t-> Q ' n it^ i ..1. .:a ~ R MASTER ~ I a KITCHEN ~ o BATH ~ ,13`X44-2° I MAS7ERBEOROOM o, o - \ / BATH \ / / \ -1"X 13'-9` sr x ss I I I ~ ~ LIVING I I ° - I 'VESTIBULE I LIVING I I j <'-8'xG-0• ~ / \ CtV(NG1UfRING . s DECK ta•v^xn•-r I - - •n. DECK ,a-0°x,3=r r, LIVING ~ Q< ; ~ - ~w ,ra- x7r-,m e•ex,aa• - ~ o vv ~ r ~ s FOYER ,aao•xs-r )YER FOYER MASTER 'n'n BEDROOM j / \ , ,rrxs•-,7• 2'x4''-11• f7Q'x4'•1P ~ ~ BEDROOM a' ~•d• 1r-lmxar-0• ~ ~ i / \ ' / \ : ' : _ a t` ti \ - - ~ N N i~ N VESTIBULE ~ ~ \ i / _ ` ` ,/.f DrNrNG NlNG _ DfN1NG _ ' *y • ~ FOYER UTILITY ~ e-0`x tt•-ta f BEDROOM I rra-xass ~r ~ v I i f 4,. / ~ ~f P' I °z. 3~i M I ~ t~ / / BEDROOM f / / see^x,r-,o• I BEDROOM I ~y : ~ ' r:. nz ass•xtt•4a• W W ~ DECK BEDROOM BATH / w ts•.,t-:sus- ' ~ :.x DECK 7r-rxaa ,Arm p~ ~ - Li W . 1a•-s^xtr-0` LAUNDRY - I ,ssx,rr ~ SAFH I 1~•sxs~s` W 4 ~sa•¦cs AFH m K BATH ~ ~ - F w ! ~ N l6 F- U} I _ I o z j`_,v~r`;': -i^i?•:,'r.~ _ ~~~k,~:F_ r-SS.K-•~.~.v..<.,-..cr' 7.•:': .~'r'::':v.,..• . NU W i`J"t-V:6~•~;L ~:~ii•." w7: r,.X `k~~ h•.s:.3:•;,•i~:i: ''q'~~=..:>S"v",•- .r k:x~ ¦ ~ rn rn 1 BEDROOM UNIT B 2 BEDROOM UNIT C 3 BEDROOM UNIT A 2 BEDROOM UNIT C 2 BEDROOM & STUDY UNIT D t9 M M r 1 5 ~ = o. 118 -1-0 1!8"=1-0 - N /w ti^ N N O ~ ti W p X ~ Q t~ a o a- m s 00 ~ ~ ,w N Q v+ a~ ~ ? Fn V ~ m r n of m t„j a? v_ ~ ti c 'ca c ~ ~ m ~ us n OCopyright-,Graham OesignAssadates,.Ph NI rights reserved. :t. This material is fheexrJusive property ofGraham DesignAssociates, PA. G Reproducgon in whole or in parts is sfictly proht~t wiBwut ffie prior written k `1 a01 pemussion of G2ham ~esignAssoaates, P.A, and any such reproductlon may ~C 'r m mm3 suhjeG you to civil amltorcriminal l~bifity zAN under Fde 1T of the Unfled Slates lode. •0m .i0~ .3 V / l~ n o~ < :s: : Z m e~ 2 - _ . m ~y I I d I O J Q ~ n Q ROOEf ~ o mr 3 ~ .timn omy ~ xNy i {v LL ~ G :ii ,1 ~ m LWL ~ v~ ~ Wfl CLOSET ~ tmurY ti D . ~ J ~ Q r r• • a BEDROOM ~ ' UT1LlTY DINING W HALL 13=1Px10'-0" BATH J urulrr ! DECK I s~~xsa• FOYER a~•a^~a•-0-0. I ra•x,r-r DECK tr-ia•x,9's saxra" S'S°xP3• FOYER ao•~„•r ~ V 33'a•.a'-0• ssx9•.a• LAUNDRY I - "1!. f - - ' ...i i, f' ~ O CLI m ~ ,r.., x LAUNDRY r.• Z U _ :::a m ~ n m y Q m ~ ~ ,t-rx,ds ~m xa x,~ Y 9 v : N ~ O LIVING MASTS a - ~ ~ x o ~ _ 4. o x ; m 7~ ;n: I ~z - ,ra•x1ar ....j..~, t BATH ~ { BATH ~ I is aas9~xa-0• s'•rxe'•+1• Z ~ ~ p _......_-m.-,.....q... - ' KITCHEN I BATH LOSET I ~ ~ - HALL ~~//j(~~f O I Yl d r-0•xri ~ tYS%78'3' _ . :L]; _ 'I O ~ ,tie^xsar S.J Y.+ I • i - f I ki I I ~ LL ' - I I ~ . m i Q1 I ~ I o x D C ° ° ~ ~ I n~`• ' vesrlauLe r~ I I W ' m g'i i 4 ~ : 2 r _ HALL _ - _ a-rxs-r I ESTIBULE - - _ 1 as-msr d ~ ~ . o m o ~ - z ~ - x I KIT H N I, r ~ MASTEF i _.-..__..,..._y_...... ASTE BEDR00 MASTER y. I _ arsxiea• I ~ BEDROOM ~ I i I I ~ ~ ~ C 14 ` < ' Z " BATH 1z`~-R1,~S m ~ I ,s~x,%,,- 6ATH " BEDROOM O iarxsrl. I. I' ~ . D i < I I ~ z Z DINING I I _ - ` i,:iax+rr _ .~;.s r m _ _ I ,Li~tNG Q D I irrxlsr _ _ ` - - BEDROOM LINEN i m DINING _ _ - CLOSET - - - - - - - 14g Y,4fi-------- I ~ e-rss © " BEDROOM I I ;a I I CLOSET t Q I f I, -aa•-s~R- CLOSET TILITY :r iT-iQ•ria".p _ LAUNDR = MASTER r '2 I I I VE. sa xa'a BEDROOM VESTIBULE it'd•x 71<' z'd•x R,i- " CLOS L t i _ 4 ' MASTER m m m BEDROOM ; o BEDROOM LIVING mO 5. A irsx,rs• ,e'a'xra'd' DECK MASTER - FOYER 1 0 ••o irn•x,m-o• DECK +sai•x>a'-fo• o N o s4 earN p ao - ns•R;:~-r zc-s xa's BATH 3 ~ 00 KITCHEN - STUDY i L MASTER - 00 iasxfo-,o• f8i1^xira^ GREGG HOLDSWORTH 7> LICENSE NO. AR 0017669 PANTRY 3 BEDROOM UNITE 2 BEDROOM UNIT F o 2. BED 2 BEDROOM & STUDY UNIT G 4 BEDROOM- UNIT H R- Y R IY- R 1/8" 8 _ i 9 URIGINAL, 1r$ =1'-0" 118, -1-0" THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 000.0.752 00, %uX E 05-42 8 2005 P NINGDEPARTMENT ly OFCtEARWATER At 15 DATE DRAWN CHECKED 11IM5 MAWIPC TJG i o ~ m ~ ~ I I F n ~ ~ ~ _ a~ ti~ ~ _ ~ 0. o~o°~~ ~ rn c ~ .s= o ~ om I ~ ~ Y U N N ~ ~ I I I , I wn; ~~S W~=4 I I ~ U VY 3 ~ ~ O L ~ L z c , N ~ ~ o r-------1 .1 a}i~Q x I I W~ I I ~m4 ..q aam fA ~ to U ~ N a_ O) U I rn; j m ~W'a I O' ] m . ~ ~ •Q ~ ao m Q i I I ~~o N. c ~L~L~ t ,W.°o: , ~ wt•. - I rna. ca•~~~ Hh, Qo4. ' tq Q: - ~WQ ~ r.:y. ' . as ~ v, Lo~u~ ~u,m~a I o o. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:.~,as m„ I Nm I N ~ ~a~~o I _ ~ ~ e I ~ I 2 ~ ~ c ~ ui ~~Qo~ s:.,. - _ tY' • ~ ~ W - ~ 4 I 2 9 U G3 N (6 (6 -F +r O ~ ~ r o0 ' ~a R° I Y I I J C ~ O tU = I .I j I U th O Q) C ~ C I - - I F o Ym~ I 2 (Yj^ ~ O ~ Us ~ N U - ~ ~ r-. _ w O U I z~ °mq I u ow C ~ O I z~ .Q ~ N O O O L N py U I _....._Y I O U U D3 ~ O I I ~ ~ U (fS _ ~ c O. ~ ~ ~ ~ Ul ~ O 0' O a to O C Q. U m ~ m W V ~ ~ ~ ~ F- ~ ~ U N Z: > Y~ 0 ~ t~6 ~ L Z N L O JQ LL ~ ` N' ~ ~ R ~ p.. I I --------t ~ ~ a ~ ~ O r 1 WH I i f ~ C O C A t V) i~ (U U O LLm = I. Q CI I I ~ ~ UTILITY i , KITCHEN ~ o' .~i .Q O ~ N +rsx+ru• (SS L O .G ~ UIUNDRY s-0•MSa• I; >v L N U C I I - ,.y; i sno•ov~• I ~ MASTER ~ to _ C e i 'o i I rc ~ j I k I I I MASTER I I BATH O O h. ;I. W. I 9 ~ E I m I. i •UpDRY I I BATH 0 I FOYER. I _ I tra•xtza• ~ ~ _ . ~ sZ UNDRY I I sr•.+a+e' I o a I ® -O to N~~ L t I N wAU(,'N 0 y___. aosrr t I I MASTER t •rxe•S• unuTY I Q ' _ I 1 I-NNm._4- ntrxsa" I l KITCHEN O 4 ~ I vWi a ~ W ~ BATH ~ aB,AxsH^ I I l +au•xnw• ° e - I o~ C~ z I u I u I FOYER i 1 ~ e o o I I ; " i z , ~ I ewser I . . ~ 3 . I, sa•.sa• I I I HALL uosar I 3 ~ TALI - sa^xss I co Lq I I DINING t I I +z rxua- I ~ ~ 7( U ~ .m__ _...r.a - - ~ d• d• y i 0 T 5 J ~ °2 0~ C` I S i _ r~ Q h: C o p f:: z 2 x I W ~ ,:2 Q ~ mF Q m m NN _ _ _ MASTER ' UVING Ivv J ~ { fo 1'p'~ J a - - I . 6EDROOM. +CSx+sA• I s tsxxtaa• i BEDROOM I w: ® ? MASTER I. . T_ Y 4 I DINING I. +rrxtss BEDROOM +''•rxtsJ" I t t. _ Ai4 16d•XW'd' I I LIVING ~ +smxtss• m °T'.._, W~'7 _ I I ~ wzW " I MASTER N ~ I ~ BEDROOM ~ M wad ~ I ~ I': I W -o Vim- ' NQ.~,, I, I LL mom.. I h' <°w~. ~ I u~i0 o, N LL O ~ ~ DECK jab m` I mK;, D.. YbS4xa4" W ~ f6 ~ m ~ . I ~ ^ I thu S 9 t m I I 0 J U ~ ~ DECK z ~ ~p ~ I v I as:rar Q Cif U `'s (»'rf,Sy~I.~•.~~a-=,.T:>i'i {?'t:xe~.',.'1..'~.~,:4::~Y: ^~+"L~ »G: / ¦ ~ ~ . ¦ a~ rn 7 ~ M M L ~ ~ ti r/ _ N n ~ W ~N 4 BEDROOM & STUDY UNIT I 5 BEDROOM & STUDY UNIT J 2 BEDROOM UNI' OOM UNIT K 2 BEDROOM UNIT L W 12 ~ ~ 11 N_tN i- ~ R_ I R ~ R- I R R- I R 118 -1-0 118 -1-0 1l8 -1-0 1/8 -1-0 ~1 Q I,_ G o a~ cs m so a v, N u ~ tQ o~ ~ ~ ~a ~m fOYER ~ I~ c ~w. ,:4 ~ O _C U" I f ~ uriun I 3:rx70N' 2 I = 3'$'X10'•7' i LauNDRr ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` I =5 = LAUNDRY . _ LAUNDRY I KGTCHEDI Q ~ a s-rxs<• I +rsxas BATH MASTER BATH ~ FOYER r - I F I I BATH. O t1%'x8's rr~Xlis I: FOYER I MASTER'BATH DINING ~ - NITCNEN I ; LAUNDRY - c~ F +rrXta'a• 7sa•xtsa I . I - ' .KIT I tra•~tca• I s-0•=tna• I cNEH i I ta'-rXto'-t• c I - _ ~ I MAg~R ~ o. 0 1 t j ©CopyligN-Graham.DesgnAssacraales,P.A I .c, ~ fGYER I BATH HALL AGrightsresened. I a 1 i NITCIIEN I +r-rx++s _ ~ TNSmaterial is D1e exduslveproperty NITCIIEN I +na•xsa, I ' otGraham Design Assapafes, PA.. op : I Qo ,ra•ssa• Q~ ; _ HALL fteprodudionin.wholeacinparlsLs VESTIBULE HALL - I y I - 0 _ Q Q VESTIBULE emlis9ono GrahamuDesi 6ASSeCia~ P 9 R„ PAandanysudirepludueGonmay I waucw. ~ _,.....m. _ _ I ciaser I ee•=sa ~ LAUNDRY H ~ HALL L--- ~ L_-- ~ I STUDY - su~edyoutoavGanNoraiminafliabiGty I 1 ~ WALiFINCLOSEf _TN L-_----- 8'Sxt0'-5• 9'-rxe'3 _ _ I tr.•.xr+s underTGi e1loflheUniledSlatesCode. WAIAdN I _ UTILRY~-• s~a~xar I s, b• I BEDRDDM DINING +rsx+a:t+. '6! 9de xt1'i" v: UVINO(OININQ PANTRY i ' zrs•Xtrs _ y ~G y.. ~P a.osEr I. +sJ•x5'-0f• I I ' MASTER 6~ROOM - BEDROOM tt'd"x t+•-0• lz•° ~ . i_.__.. MASTER ~ +asX+za• BEDROOM (/(e~~ VESTIBULE M tusx+rs ~F B~ROON Q a" MASTERBEDROOM ta:rX+ss LRNNG ROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM I +rax+r-r ~ ~ BATH ~ er:+sr ~ ~ ty-0.x7sw• t8'•TZtrf0• ta'•rx+zr ' ~ J LIVINf UVING U- LIVINGIDINING MASTER +r~•,+s r DECK 72'9 4 us x+sc ro•xts:r W +2a•xta:r Ir q DEC14 y ,a t :i e'A•xS r i` ~ ' DECH ~ b Q DECK ~ W 6-0•X2A•17• LL v - u;~ L Q f ® ~ 0 W U 4 2 BEDROOM UNIT M 3 BEDROOM UNIT N ~ UJ 1 2 BEDROOM UNIT 0 2 BEDROOM & STUD' UNIT P ~ R, 1 11 ~3 ~ ~ 11_ 1 11 118 -1-0 118 -1-0 1, 15 N_ttt 15 b o n_ t n 118 -1-~ ~JE 11B -1-0 ~ Q W BEDRDDM ~ h powDER Q ~ 0' ~h z ra^xe'x STUDY _ A I t lrsx wa• ~ wa+xr, r uneny MASTER i cwsEr vJ FOYER i BATH rto - ' 11'•10"x17-6• BATH POWDER GO•xiT-0• s~•x6F DECK t88'x,B-0' LAUNDRY I issxr-r I HALL fl KITCHEN I I 173•xTZ'•1" I Z, I MALL n t I I I WALK-IN i CLOSET I ' I s-rxla-4• I i^ I w i 0 i *x GREGG HOLDSWORTH LIVING. MASTER; BEDROOM LICENSE NO. AR ,CdPx,rA• 0017669 BEDROOM iraxrr-r DINING DINING LIVING HALL ir8"ris-0^ 1Y~ xlso MASTER BEDROOAP ~fii"z383'r x CLOSET ORIGINA' 1 VESTIBULE BATH ~ ia•-mxuv ~ nS I I I i 1 t_" WALX-]N. DECK 14'L"x14'•4• THOMAS}. GRAHAM ~ KITCHEN I y STUDY 0 8'4xirS ~ LICENSE NO. AA C000752 14-0'x14'-4• L-------=-- FOYER ,sa•xs-r i MASTER BATH Ro"'EC Li LAUNDRY 8'S'xzTS I s'a^x,rx 05-42 ° NOV %EIVEF% 0 8 2005 pLAWNING DEPARTMENT 3 BEDROOM & STUDY UNIT Q CIN OF CLEARWATER Al 16 2 BEDROOM UNIT R , 16 118. _ -1-0" ~ 1 A 1/811 -1-0DATE DRAWN CHECKED 1118105 MAW/PC TJG i o ~ ~ N u0i p ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O 3 ~i N = Na C~.C a1NY ~ N ~-4, ~ U ~ U ~ ~ P001 POOL SPA S70RAGE SUPPLIES ~ C.C N ~ L ~ C V} Vi C? p U s. N ~ p O O O. C L ~ a+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p V p U U tlmtl ~ ~ i N ~ L O rn POOL O a3. ~ ~ ~ C~7=. ~ N EOUIP. R00~ BELOW 0 0 ~ ~ ~ i N O ROOF BELOW ~ ~ ~ C.) uj ~o~o~ O N ~ U (0 O R~S N ~ L ~ N i O N ~ ta m Q3 lJ.l ~ > V O'N N N U 'a C POOL ~ O to ~ U ~ v U C ~ ~ w=. ~ O - O d1 ~ t4 O p L p N U O Q ~ w c c~v ~o . m c a?~~~~ Qo.°,=~~ U N N p O ~ N O [6 H ~ fU Z N p O t l Qf ~ Q. ~ p to ~ ~ ~ N p RS p O U ~ SCALE: 1116" =1'-0"' t3. ~ p N ~ L _ U ~ O. S3. j ~ Q. p ~ N p- ~ L (=A U ~ to rr i C U UNIT F , I UNtT Q t UNIT B UNIT f I UNtT A ti UNIT A UNITE r UNIT B i UNIT D t UNIT F ai ~ c vy 'Q o ~ ~ t N ~ Ua ~ I- N c6 m O ~ rn rr Orr7170'BELOW ~rn bm~ ru~av MECH. ~ ~ u~ ¦ ~ - ~ r` n N N t` ~ i, y~ 0 ® ` „ ® ~ m ® ~ m .a r i - ® O 0 - - m ® _ £ ~ - 4 m O ~ O ~ ' 0 ? ? ? ~ M MKII ~ O ~ ~ l ELECTRICAL O RIS A7K7L ~ (n M N ~ f/~r~ ~ O orw ro e¢av 0 0 ' OPENTQ BQOW ii m ~L L7 ~ U 9 ~I n l' ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ 2 r ~ Q V ~ ~ L~ ? 0 ? ~ ~ ~ ~ NU ~ Q Q e ® - ~ m. ® Q ~ @ W 0' - e e w p (gym ¦ Z !A O Aa , , a lA R t ~ ~ Y'7 M' ~ ~ ~ ti 0 ~ _ y _ ¦ Y/ N ~ W N W X v Q c~ a o a W ~ ~ r a . N Q UNIT F ( UNIT D UNIT 8 UN(f f UNITA U f ~ ~ _ UNIT A UNff E UNIT 6 UNIT D ~ UNIT F 0 U? ~ Q mm ~v ~ `o ~ LL r C 1() C ~ SCALE: 1116" =1`-d» ~ UNIT F I UN1T D I UNIT B I UNITE I UNlT A I U UNIT A , UNITE UNIT 8 t UNIT D t UNIT F ~ ®Copyright-Graham Design Associates, PA NI dgbfs reserved: This material is the exclusive property ofGrahamDesign Associates, P.A.. - RepraductiaRinivholeorirtparfsis sorictly prohibited without the prior written. permission of (wham Design Assc crates, PA. and ~y sudt reproduclion may subjec4youtocml andtoraiminal fmbi6ty under Tmle 17 oiiheUrirted States Code. ovwroeaaw . ~ MECH. ovrn+TOa¢av ~Q 0 0 ® 0 ~ U} - ~ ~ ~ _ ~M . ~ _ v ~ . ® ~ ~ _ ~ O ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ? ELECTRICaL ? _ ? _ Q ~ Q ~ o ? 0 p ~ 0 J o~~~ l1 OPWTOBHaV 0 0 W iY W ? V ~ ~ Q ? ~ ? C ~ 0 ~ ? Q - V .J ~ - . G' ? ~ ? o ~ ~ _ ~ > Q m ~ Q ~ ~ w 0 0 i , i , . ® ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 W ¦ U En ~ _ O Z O .1 ~ ut ~ ~ Q Z. w UN1T A UNITE UNIT B UN1T D UNIT F LL UNIT F UNIT D UNIT 6 UN1T f ~ UNIT A UP s ~ 2 V1 O Z n SCALE: 9/16" = 1'-0" 11 comm. 3 35 YARD TRASH COMPACTOR TRASH -W-V COMPACTOR G ~ a ~ ¦ ~ GREGG HOLQSIMORTH F . . - - LICENSE NO.. AR I I 0017669 7 , 888 5Q. FT 1, 898 SQ. FT 1, 898 SQ. FT 1,898 SQ. FT O 4j052 SQ. FT 4,052 SQ. FT 11898 SQ. FT 11898 SQ. FT 1,898 SQ. FT 1,888 5Q. FT 7,888 (LEASABLE AREA) 08 (LEASABLE AREA) (LEASABLE AREA) (LEASABLE AREA) (LEASABLE AREA). o o (LEASA ~ 1,428 SQ. FT (LEASABLE AREA) (LEASABLE AREA (LEASABLE AREA) (LEASABLE AREA) (lEqS,ggL€ AREA) 1,428 sQ. Fr ~ ORIGINAL (LEASABLE AREA) (LEASABLE AREA) { t ~ t t t t 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 N_ R 9 THOMAS y. GRAHAM g m m LICENSE NO. AA RECEIVED C00072 - gIL -------an Nov 08 2005 05-42 - JL - = - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1st LEVEL MASTER PLAN LAN NORTH CITY OFCIEARWATER Al 17 SCALE: 4f16" =1'-0" o 77 DATE 13RAWN 'CHECKED 1118105 uuvuos nc 1 o ~ gym. ai ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ 3 O ~ ~ N = .O I myc~.OC ~ Y _ Ul C ~ N ~ .C ~ •a o - c t ~ N ~ t~ N U) ~ V1 U ~ ~ U O O O ash U a° c ~ ~ m Y N L C O U O ~ U ~ U N L Gn r L _O U1 ~ O O ~ O C ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ N N O ~ ~ p U ~ O N Q O ~ U (6 N (6 ~ ~ ..C Q. ~ L L "r p ~ ~ N N ~ O .a N N ~ U tl7~ p•- ~ O V) 3 N U - ~ w p.L O- ~ ~ ~ O (0 O O ~ ~ ~ C C,? U: ~ ~ O ~ ~ C Q- N ~ O ~ ~ ' Q` N ~ O ~ ~ YG ~ C I STER BATH U O N ~ ~ ONE. .c WAtK•tN I a-osEr I aN I Z clr ~ ° ~ = I MASTER BEDROOM ~ ~ O- ~ f3'-1'x4'-10' I I e•-,o• I ts'-it^Xts's e0 O ~ 'a ~ N I FOYER C N N ~ f0 U O MASTER BEDROOM fs's°xtr3" ur urrES ~ O O- V' BREAKFASTAREA L .c rn U c BATH MASTER BATH ts:s"xaa' MASTER BEDROOM ta3•xa-0• dASTER BATH wH ~ ss . ~ ~ u> tb~fi X6-0' ~ N ~ ~ ~ L f5'•f0"x13'5" O ® 0..o I I i a DECK I I ~ Wnuc-R+ sxrxtsr DECK I " DINING ~ c_Er 3'S"x4-8• ~ T-0'xa5 ~ 8-0•xtT-0" I I ia:a•x r-r KITCHEN 12'3'x8'8° BEDROOM#2 I BATH BATH BATH..- _ ~ - r-rXto~-s^ 1s-1r'x1s^-s° I tos^xs'-o" WH _ os'xe'-r ' ~ ~ - c>Jin rnrn ~ , un nfEs ~ X~'-~ N N FDYER 9'5'x53' ~ ~ - hn FOYER I s'-s•xs-r dER Xs-1• IMNG I DINING LIVING za'.t•Xia-tr BEDROOM #2 m f1-0"xiT-0" ~ KITCHEN LIWNG 12`-2"xiS3" d) ~ r~ I 1a-0"x10'•1• 13'-T'%t4-10" ° NN tlN I .3 M I II DINING ' ° j ~ 'II I _ KITCHEN I ~ to-0•xs'n" (ITCHEN I BEDROOM#3 m o I ir-irxia'a- ~ I..L tL a-0 xs'.1• DECK ~ ~ - I - - _ ~ t ti=ib•xa'•r ~ v > m . - ~ ~ --J x ~ U z tr ~ ~ ¢ NU ¦ ~ do' a ~ ~ '~A ~ n_ r`'- -f t. n N N O W ~ n W f. _ ~ SCALE: 118f~ _ 1f (Sf~ ~ G X _ , „ F- SCALE: 118 -1-0 SCALE: 118 1-0 c~ a c~ av W ~ O T ~ Q N ~ OG to .3 O c~ a M ~ ma U3 ~ ~ ~ i ~ c un I ® ® i I I BATH ' ~ ununr:s I i 4••ti•.xr-s• BEDROOM t13 T•rxib`-s ffiCopyri shtGta~mUezsign Assoaafes, P.h n9 11=irxtaa• j Thismateriat istheexdusiuepmperty I I I of Graham Desir~Associate,S,PA.. I RepmdueGoninwMJeDrinp~ts~ I shidlyprohibi~dwilhoulNepdorwriflen FOYER permissan of (wham Design Assoaates, I I tisx++-s• PAandanysuchreproducfionmay subjedyou to civdanNoraiminalliablhy I BATH I I nr~tler iitte 97 of thoUnrted S'<ates Code. 1f=rxT-s '1 I BEDROOM #3 I fa3•xmz• I - BEDROOM~2 I MASTER I z iz'-rXiss• - BREAKFAST BATH HALL I. I iTCHE ARfA iza'Xs'r" tAI1NDRY I I ,2'3•x8'8' a ir-n~.Xe'-n° I I I ~ ~ 4'•8"x4'-t0° I o ` I ~ I ~ I LL M I 0. 4 I ~ Q I BEDROOM#2 I I I ~I r ~ KITCHEN I 15-10'x13'-9• I I ~ I I ~ 0 I I "I tan•xlrA" I - Q 1 I r'- LIVING I I u' I _ i i O fl 2D'd•x74'•it' I I I I I I°° I I _ DINING I !tm"x1a3• I ~ Fem., Q I KITCHEN _ I fa-0•xfa-0• LIVING I O, LIVING u 13'-0"xtT-0" 13'-0" x 17-0" H Q DINING I Q• ~ it:3"x N'3' { I ~ J U MASTER BEDROOM FOYER DINING ts-aa~xts s f J ta~•Xrr ~ r5" x s-6" LIVING W ~ U 1T5"x1T5• ® ~ cD fl IAU s rao" ~ ~ xi FOYER T3'xS-8' J z BECK n~ nE WAtHa DECK ~ Q _ J . b ~ 5-0•x3s'-0" r-trxT-r DECK DECK > Q T.cxa-r MASTER BEDROOM s'-a"~tc5• 8'3°x 16'8" ~ , tT3"z73'-B" WAIiWN Z 1tf11.tT1ES MASTER earth 7ni"x Tn" ~17 T'xT-1 12'3"x5-t0• Fh f~ VI MASTER BEDROOM DECK Z lb 7 Tffgllln~ Q M DIE 3 BEDROOM - UNIT D 1 BEDROOM - UNITE SCALE: 118" = T-0" SCALE: 1!8" = 1'-0" 4 SCALE: 1/8!'= 1'-0" GREGG HOLDSWORTH LICENSE NO. AR 0017669 0 R cP~ q , & THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA C000752 E I V E NOV 0 8 2005 05-42 .1 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OFCLEARWATER Al 18 DATE JDRAWN CHECKED 11!81(5 MAWIPC TJG - - - _ _ a ~ ~m m ~mwQ a m v Y ~ N C y.., m ~ ~ 3~N-3 ~~?~o ~ ~ t9 ~ N ~ C N v O t- ~ +p ~ O` O C 'C ~ ~ 7+ ~ a ~ C = N C ~ ~ ~ ~j ~ ~q N N ~ U N - 's ~ :r C G~ ~y~~j ~ v ~ $ N c ~ c C •3 m .~~o`~'v c.v>c~~ - ~ 3 c .~N~~c m- $ ~ .c ~ ~ o ,d b c ;c3a ~ a mc~a - ,cc€ a$wcoo ~oN,g SSE m E .~~e m 3 ~ ~ n ~ .o A-210 z°'fia3 ~ ~ -o o~ c c m•~ c a ~ ae.~ I 1 LIGHNING PROTGT(ON ~ 'o, o E m a r N $ c sYSrEM. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I 1 1 CONCRETE BARREL ~ g ~ 'o-. TILED ROOF, TYP. ~ m E ~ 1 A-252 d ~o N~~ CONCRETE BARREL TILED 1 I ROOF f I 1' I IGHT WEIGHt PRECAST t ~ I w BRACKETS, TYP. 8 1 ~ I m~ A-214 RAISED STUCCO I TRIM BAND, TYp. I i i LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST MEDALfON, TYP. MEDALION TYP. 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST / ~ TRIM BAND, TYP. I • I i' I 1 I ALUMINUM TILL S ALUMINUM TRELLIS LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST _ - . - - _-.-.-.-.-.--I - - - - m - ~ - • - ~ - ~ - ~ - - - - I a•+a-a-a=a-a- . - . WINDOW PEDIMENT, TYP - - . - - - e I e ROCF DECK m ~ LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST ~ ~ ti PRECAST DECORATIVE PRECAST DECORATIVE WINDOW PEDIMENT,,TYP. m PIECE ~ PIECE ~ ~ ~ p W ~ 169 -8 ~ c LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST TRIM fM AN TY . I ' 16TH LEVEL/f'ENTHOUSE to w ~ TR 8 D, P TRIM BAND, TYP. ~ @ o o .SAND, TYP. 0 0 tYP. ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ F-- ~ ~ I IGN~PRE6AST- • - - • • - - - • I . - . - . - - - - - L GHfi~IIE ALUMINUM CASEMENt _ - _ - _ 159'-m" z ° m - ~ N :ASEMENt ? 15TH. FLOOR WINDOW PEDIMENT TYP. ~ W 'YP. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " > ` 5/8 PORTLAND CEMENT WINDOWS, TYP. 0 0 0 0 0 o A-251 STUCCO OVER 8' CMU, TYP. 0 - Z - . 148'•4' .SILL..LYP. . - . - . - . - . - - - - ~ - - ~ - - - - - -.P~ECASLSfLL-~'.~'- ALUMINUM TRELLIS WINDOWS, 147H FLOOR Z . 0. ~ ti ~ y fl o 0 7 0 0 0 o ALUMfNUM TRELLIS LUMINUM TRELLIS ~ W ~ N • i i A-210 ~ W ..C ~ - 13~'-8°• ~ 12TH FLOOR ~ LIG1:4fi~WEfG1~PREtkST TRIM • - - - - - - - ~ - - • - • - ~ - - - . - . - . - . BAND, TYP. @ o o . A-21d ~ ~ Q 0 0 0 0 ® o o LfCsHT WEIGHT PRECAST ~ A O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I COLUMNS, TYP. A v I ~ 12Z'-m" m O - ~ ~ N - -1 _ I fi ~ I1THFLOOR I ~ Q ~ LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST i o p o 0 0 @ o 0 0 1 TRIM BAND, tYP. 1 ~ 0 0 0 0 o a o LIGHT WEICsHt PRECAST ~ ~ ~ ° TRIM BAND TYp. D m , ~ ~ a I I mm ~ _ _ . 116'=4' ~ -•-I•- - At~h1INUM- - - - - ALUMINUM-t FABRfG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ImTE~ FLOOR e~ 42' STEEL GUARDRAILS s , i WINDOW AI I 1 I WINDOW AWNING, TYP. / 2' STEEL ~SUARDRQILS t ro - ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 © o BALLUSTERS o p ~ o 0 o p o ~ BALLUSTE~;'S 0 ~ ~ o I I - - Im5 -a - - - - ~ - - ~ - ~ 9TH FLOOR 5/8'-PORTLz~iD CEMENT - • - • - - - - . - - . - . -I . - ~ - 1 ~ S'N000 OVER 8' CMU, TYP. o @ @ o I o p @ i c~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 p 0 ~ ~ I I OCopyApM•G~hemDaelpnAeeodeE~a,PA ~ Al~gtasreeerved. l I I I 95'-m° - mrme~ran~eez~e ~ .-•-t~-~ - - - - - I -I I I STI-, FLOOR ' I ~ - Repoduo6mnwhdewiepeAeN 0 0 0 0 @® o o @@ @ o o@ @ o o Q o @ o 0 o O ~ 0 O O 0 0 0 0 p 0 ~ I O O 0 - - - Q p 1 I Am~ ~~nemo~a~o, ' ~ ~a ~a~~auy 1 - - .-.-1 - - I - .I - . - 84.4 A.FF. leaY°" _ - - - - udxTaelTdtlaUr~adSidaeCode. ~ ~ ~Ti--`. FLOOR l ~ 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 @ 0 I 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0@ 0 0 6 ~ ~ o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o Q ~ PREFABRICATED - - . - . CO~ER~80F, - ~ - - - - ~ - 6TH FLOOR - - A-210 4 , ~ 0 0 © ~ 0 @ 0 0 @ 0 0 0 0 0 @@ 0 p Q O ~ { o o ~ ~ a 5/S PORTLAND DEMENT ~ ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 o A-214 0 0 0 o STUCCO OVER 8' CMU, rYP. 0 I I ~ ~ I - . 63 (d ti -t .1- - -•-.-•-•-I - - -I- f-- - - 1. ~ ~ I - I' - . - - ' ~ ~ - 5TH FLOOR ~ I I I METAL LOUVERS ~ LICsHT WEIGHT PRECAST ~ o o ~ Q • p p ~ ~ - TRIM BAND, TYP. 0 0 1 1 I - - - I. 2,-4.. cC I - 5 o -.-.-.-.-I ~ - - I f I - 4TH FLOOR LL I io 1 0 0 0 0 ~ T GTE i ~ @ w 1 i i i i i i ® ® ~ ~ ~ .I I ~ ~ 41'-8" Q ® - . - L - - - - ~---J . 3RD FLOOR ~ t io ~ ._I, , y a a I ,L J v I II ~ - 2ND LEVEL LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST - g / LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST ~ I- ~ LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST MEDALION,I7P. LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST ~ ' w MEDALION, TYP. TY , @ ~ U 2 COLUMNS, COLUMNS, P RAISED STUCCO RAISED STUCCO , - . - . 20'-4' 5 ~ .T.- ~2 - • A-210 - - - ~ -LfGI~-WE(GId~PRECASr. - - ~ - ~ - - ~ - - - - - - CA TYP TRIM BAND, TYP. TRIM BAND, TYP. 15T LEVEL otl P, LIGHT WEIGHT pREC,4'oT ~ Z A-210 GAP, TYP. " ~ J N - - - - - - - - - , - . - . - . - . - ~ - . - . - . - . - . - . 12-0 _ BASE FLOOD ELEV. ~ ~ " N , p 0-0 RF.ELEV. _ WATER LEVEL ~ 0 Z i GREGG HOLD5WORTH LICENSE NO. AR 0017669 A e~- u p 0 N THOMAS J. GRAHAM r i E I LICENSE NO. AA C000752 N V 0 00 05-42 NI P R M P N Off F L OR EA T ELEVATION A S 1 , 200 0 DATE DRAWN CHEmo Z 1imm mmim Tm o p~ m N C ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ O ~ 4f 'G ~ ~ N 3~ ~'a o •O ~ N = dJ O ® ~ N ~ ~ .'C ~ O O.' p~ ~ V a. O C$j~ tp ` C ~ C 3 $ V _ ~ ~ ~ N t4 y ~ ~j O C '3~a7 ~ m ~ a~ ~ ~y ~ d o ~ o~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ c -`o ~ c •N 'p ~ a N 3 C L ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ G m f0 ~ C O m ~ ~ V ~ ~ C ~ C a ~ H co C N ~ ~ E: Z a ~ ~•o m~ ~ ~ ~ c N ~ C3 C C d •C C_•t3 O.C. r 1 •3'~ o E as o. ~.cw$~c r ~ t0 'y 'C g- a 1 I ,C ~ m ~ ~ F- a~ W di ~ w 2 A-250 { . A-213 ~ i LICzNT WEIC~Nt PRECASt TRIM LIC~NT WEfCsHt PRECAST MEDALION,tYP. ~ ~ I I BAND, TYP. / _ ! ~ I I a LICsNT WEICs~IT I I [ ~ t 4 NN 5/8' PORTLAND CEMENT ~ ~ PRECAST TRIM N I AN TY STUCCO OVER S CMU, TYP. ~ B D, P ~ A-211 SIM. ~ ~ C.C 1 f I ~ r I ~ L(CsHT WEICsF4T CAP a BALL, tYP, o I ~ f ' A a I 42 STEEL fsU RDRAILS N~ 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 BALLUSTERS ® ° W I ~ LL © I ,,.r, t'. I ~ > ` I © o o m © o 0 0 ® o o o e ® ° I z ~v i W © ~ ALUMINUM CASEMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WINDOWS, TYP. © o o ® o 0 0 0 ® o o a ~ p ® 0 518' PORTLAND CEMENT Z o - TUCCO 0 'CM TY ~ ¦ - S vER 8 U, P. 3 - - - y di © o 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 o e A-211 SIM. ~ N 0 0 W 0 I C.7 a I ~ © 0 0 1 e m © e o s o o o p ® o f T I LICsNT WE CsN PRECAST M I W r TRIM BAND, TYP. 1 © I M I ~ ~ 1 fA a ~ - - - ~ RAISED STUCCO ~ ~ ALUMINUM t FABRIG Q rn 0 0 0 o I® o o Q o ~ ® o~ o A-211 SIM. I o p ® o o TRIM BAND, TYP. ~ a IUINDOW AUININCs, TYP. r~ V ALUMINUM CASEMENT ~ e ' 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 . WINDOUIB, TYP. ~ o p p o a RAISED STUCCO ~ tR(M BAND, TYP. © o o m o o ® o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ pCap~ht•dehemDeel~A¦a1a~e,PA ® Q l Nl~bn¦erced. ~I tlde amtalal b 9re e~ire pioprgr of Qah¦n Ded~n A68aCfet¦, PA, ALUMINUM CASEM~It Relanhwholeabperbb ebldy proh~Md wiE'IR¦aii tlu priawdbe WINDOWS, TYI? p o 0 0 0 0 0 0~ o 0 ® e o 9 O p p 0 O 0 0 ~ p p anY n>aoducOpimel f -s euEject you b d+i udkr edMod lbb~ly ud¦T~11dt¦UdmdSbmeCode. PRECAST SILL TYP. ~ WINDOWS. ~ ~ , o p p © 0 0 0 ~ o PRECAST SILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® o ® o 0 0 'tYP• m U11NDOtUB. 0 LICsHT WEICsNt PRECAST TRIM BAND, TYP, 0 0 0 o e o o a o e o o 1 o p p o o / o o 1 I ~ ti I 42' STEEL CsUARDRAILS a ~ , I ® Q 0 ® ® 0 0 0 ~ G A T o 0 0 o m o o ® o ® o o B LLU5 ERS I. o o LL 0 0 0 0 © 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 O 0 O I 0 0 _ I a t 3 D Q I ~ o 0 0 0 0 © o 0 0 0 0 0 p p p ~ I i I~ . o g 5/8' PORTLAND CEMENt o w STUCCO OvER 8' CMU, TYP. ® o 0 0 ~ o 0 ~ o 0 j U N 0 0 0 H A COI fN[x ~ vER E D L S. STEEL DOORS, TYP. OYERI~EAD COILINCs Z ~ o STEEL DOORS, TYP. rn A-213 ~ S STEEL DOORS, TYP. ~ CONCRETE BARREL 42 STEEL CsUARDRAILS a STEEL DOORS, TYP. TILED ROOF ~ALLUSTERS t ALUMINI~'I FRENCH DOOR, TYP: FORM AND POUR CONC. O Z - ~ STEPS. 47' 5TEEL RAILS. i i a a~ GREGG HOLDSWORTH LJCEN5E NO. AR 0017669 =Jj d z 0 U G u P,~ ~ 0 R I U t- r O Q N U a W a THOMAS J. GRAHAM a LICEN5E NO. AA 0000752 F aNV0 QO z uw 05-42 p NI DPR N SOUTH ELEVATION 1 w ins=1-D. a ~ DATE DRAWN CEiECIQ:D Z 1llm NAW/MS Tie i o a ~ m vii . ~m~~ o~3m= w ~ °c C L Y V N 3 N G ~ I ~a~?•ao °~~~~o ~S~ Q o cv t~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '9 ~ I ~,8 - ~ ~ y aV+ C ~ ~ N C~ m ~ 'O ~ ~ C S C_ ~ ~ ~.3 S rA ~ C tp 'C C ~ ~ S C 8~N•p c~ .c ~ 3 ~ ~.~3 m = w ~ S~ o_~ .EN~~c m8 . '~~°~o ~o m c :a L ~ a$ N E ~~w°'~ $ co m HEM ~ O:a...~s • Za ~°3 . a N ~ ~ ~ d, c~ ~ ~ m a c S a .Q 3 •~.Q Ema L ttA S C 'O N V ~ ~i3 1 .~g~N•~ m~~~ A-252 H co w :C ~ CONCREtE BARREL TILED . CONCRETE BARREL ROOF TILED ROOF LfCsHT IUEfCxNT PRECAS LICsNT IUEfCxHT PRECAST BRACKETS, TYP. m~ -7-~-~-~'~-~a~~a-~ ?RIM BAND, TYP. STUCCO ~ RAISEp TRIM BAND, TYP. ~ LfCsNT 4llEICsHT PRECAST 42' STEEL CsUARDRAILS TRIM BAND, TYP. t BALLUSTERS ,i - LICsHT U1EICsNT RAISED STUCCO - ~ I . CAP BALL, TYP. TRIM BAND,TYP. - - - - - - - - 180-4 - • - ROOF DECK - m ~A ~ - . - _ - - 5/8' PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE BARREL © ® ~ o © ~ T CO OVER S' CMU TYP. S UC , 0 © ® 0 p © ~M 1 ~ ~ co TILED ROOF I 15 -ALUM NUM TRELL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ • - • - ~-Su ~ ~ •C 169 _ ~o - 16TH LEVEL/PENTHOUSE ~ m ~ ip m m 0 ® ~ A 0 o e o LIGHT IUEIGHT PRECAST r COLUMNS, TYP. 159''0' _ _ Z o N 15TH FLOOR - ~ - . - . - . - • - ~ - . - LIGHT WEICsHT PRECAST ~A W o ® ® © © CAP, TYP. 0 © ® ® © I ' \ @ g i u _ . _ _ _ . 148 -4 - - I 14TH FLOOR Z ~ ~ ~q ~ n. n o © m ® o CONGRETI= BARREL ~ V> ~ 0 0 ® 0 ® ONCRETE BARREL TILED ROOF ~ @ ~ N TILED ROOF _ W ~ C „ W -y p F• ~ AtUMfNUPfTRELtfS-._._.-. _ - A-251 12TH FLOOR i4 Q LL V o ® ® o o © o ® o ~ A - v LIGFIT UIEIGHT PRECAST 127''0° _ m _ . _ . _ . - O .r. I1TiHFL00R ~ ~ a o e ® © ~ LICsNTWEIGHTPRECAST o e ° ~ CAP, TYP. / - ~a III'-4' _ . _ ~ ~ . 1 I 10TH FLOOR ~ ~ i - ¢z' StEEL C~UARC~RAILS ~ - I o a © © o o s T - ~ o I 0 0 0 0 0 42' STEEL GUARDRAILS I i BALLUS ERs @ ~u~ 1BALLUSTERS J _ _ - - - I ~S o' 105'-8° _ _ _ _ - _ - _ 9TH FLOOR I RAISED STUCCO 0 ® © o 0 o e c o 0 0 o ® e © e © © ® 0 @ '~t OCop~d•f>~nOee~AeeadeOae,PA TRIM BAND, Tl'P. ~ , ' Al~idtreanred. I _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ : _ . _ . 95 -0 - W Thhmae~delutliee~roNaprcgary ~ - 8TH FLOOR g dt~mn0edp~AseadaD~.PA ALUMINUM CASEMENT I ® o o ~p Repodudimfiwtdeahpe~eb ® ® I © ® © © ~ © ' YP~E~dvdtlauttl~apdawi~n IUINDOWS, tYP. o e o o ® o I o ,r @ prndssbndQ~nD~Ateodebt. - PAa~deiryax6remay . I AL.UMINUMFR~N~H._._.-._. _ - - . - - . - _ _ . - . 84 -4 AFF. - _ ~dyou~drtaidkraimlr~lpebily 0 S TYP: - I DO R , i -I - • - • - - - lTH FLOOR utder10e11d4ieUd6adsmbecade. ro 0 0 0 0 ® o I o 0 0 ~ i - -I 6TH FLOOR PRECAST SILL TYF? g . ~ o U1fNDOWS. o 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 i~ 0 o I 0 e © 0 e o 1 . 63-0 _ S H FLOOR cn LI~Hru~E1~HrPREC~sr~-~-~ - - - - - - - _ - _ _ ~ ~ TRIM BAND, TYP. o e o o ® o I o o a @ o I 52'-4' - ~ - - - O -I _ 4TH FLOOR 1 0 0 0 0 ® 0 8® 8 8 i~ ~ 8 8~~ 8 © e O © ~ 0 © ' I @ W - - i u J. 41-5 a - - 3RD FLOOR 3 ~ ~ I © ® © @ e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ Z J I a o a a . a a _ - - ~ 0 ~ _ a - - I -i - - - - AND LEVEL . g o o o o I ~ I- o © ® o © ® © ~ ' o o @ ~ 20'-4' . - PYC REVEAL TRIM I 19T LEVEL ~ AG`CESSORTE~TYP: _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ -I lU z _ ~ u ~ IZ -0 • _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ SASE FLOOD ELEV. W - 0 ' b N 1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~ ~ , 0 -0 REF. ELEV_ - UJATERLEVEL I_L,I ~ . _ _ _ _ _ -•-.I•-•-•-•-•- 518 PORTLANp CEMENT pECORATIvE STUCCO OVER 8' CMU, TYP. BLOCK ~ O Z A-212 i GREGG HOLDSWORTH LICENSE NO. AR 0017669 A z 0 THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000752 m. El N(V Z ~5 05-42 IPL6,01GM TET --CMM HARM? A WEST ELEVATION 1 , 0 202 DATE DRAWN CHECKED Z III= HAMS Tio - - _ o a~ ~ ~ »°~3~= N~ O~ c9 ~ N ~ ~ y C ~ ~ ~ G •3 ~ y 3 ~ ? c s 'a ~ co w Q1 C = ~ G N 8 ~'.Gi"i. V ~ O rn a c~ ~ 'H ~ G ~.B$~~n ea•~~~ ~ N ~ ~ C G~E,~E .3 ~ w c ~ m E ~ G~ c ~ .3 ~3 co ~ ~ ~ o •`v G c~m-pG. to ~ - ~ d C = C N C ~ C ~ d C ~ ~ Q. ~.~3a~ mGO~€ ~ ~ `o N o c - $ E 1 ~ 1 0 m p ~ s A-250 A-250 ~ Z a~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ 'o d~ ¦ H aG~ r t ~ c~ ~ o.a3 i E.m~ I I ~ ~ L V1 ~ C I t i W O ~ C I ~ ~ . E a I 2 .c ~~m~ I i I- .a~ co ~ . A-213 SIM. I I I I ~ t I~ I I ~ 4~ , LIC~NT WEICsNT PRECA&T I ~ TRIM BAND, TYP. ~ ~T ~ I •1 4 I sg I ~ i I 5is° PoRrLANq c~MENr ~ I A-211 SIM. I I ~ srucco ovER s" cMU TYP. i N ~ ~ ! c.~ I i -.-.-.-.-.-.!.-.-.-.-,-.-,-,-.I-, - o - - - • - LIGHT WEIGHT CAP t 1S0'-4' - I - - - ~ - - - - - - - • - • - • - ~ . TYI~ ROOF DECK ~ m a o ~ e o 9 ® 0 a 0 I 0 ° ~ ~ 42 STEEL GUARDRAILS . N ~ I ~ - ~ - 1 BALLUSTERS ~ : ~ _.-.-.-._.-.-.-.-.-.-..~.-.-.-.I-.. ~ ' ~ i o r W . 169 8 ~y ~ I ~ ~ ' 16TH LEYEL/PENTHOUSE I.L. ~ ~ m. I - - _ ° o ® 0 0 a 0 ® 0 0 0 ~ I ~ > ~ ~ t -.-.i-. _ © 159'-0' ~ Z 518 PORTLAND CEMENT ~ 15TH FLOOR ~ Nv STUCCOOYERS'CMU,TYP. iA W 0 0 ® o a o ALUMINUM CASEMENT " WINDOWS, TYP. ~ Z °O ~ - - . 148'-4° t7i F - 14TH LOOR ~ ~ SIM. A-211 0 0 ® 0 0 Z y H 1 ~ W © W - _ ~ ~ t~s. ~ O L G WE G PRECAS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 12TH FLOOR nn Q u. rRIM BAND, rrP. ~ I o i - - o ® 0 0 0 ~ V A A A 0 fl ® ~ 0 0 0 ~ " ~ 1 e Q a 1 v © I - -.-1.-. _ RAISED STUCCO O I I 11TH FLOOR ~ ~ ALUMINUM # FABRIC Tf?IM SAND, TYP. 0 0 T"' 1 fA m o m ~ I o o a o aD 3 IUINDOIU AU~IiNG, TYP. © ® 0 0 ALUMINUM A- 11 SIM. i - y I 2 ~ e O N _ ~ Q CASEMENt 1 - WINpOW5,T1'P. ~ - - ~ I 116'-4" ~ ~ 1~OTNFLOOR ~ e~ ~ ~ o ® 0 0 i 0 0 ® 0 0 0 a , ~ 0 ~ p ~ ~ - - . - . - - - . - - . - . - . - . 105 8 j 9TH FLOOR a a 0 O p ® p O o Q ® a a o a RAISED STUCCO TRIM ~ a BAND, TYP. o -O~m nAvoc~es,PA ~ y 0 95'-0' ~ - - - - ~ - - - - - iA Th~m~Ntlrezd~wprapaAy p p 0 0 0 0 p @ O G~ STN FLOOR ~ dc~noed~nseodeMe,P.A. ,3 0 p 0 a d 0 ALUMINUM CASEMENT ~ ~"D~OAb"~10b0'~'P~1h r WINDOWS, rYP. @ ~ i - PA aid enYau~ rep~o~tlai meY ° O . - - . - . - . 84 4 AF.F. ~JktyabcM9aruUaaMHalBah~y - - . - . - . - • - - - lTN FLOOR - u~?rmo~rd~u~as~escoaa PRECAST SILL o© o 0 0 o e ® o ® Q TYP. WINDOWS. PRECAST SILL TYP.', ip . Q o 0 0 o a a a WIN OWS. D A o l3'-8' 6TH FLOOR ~ o 0 0 0 1 a 0 0 0 © © ® o a o a LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST © e I I TRIM BAND, TYP. ~ - . - ~ i 5TH FLOOR o © o ~ o o ® o a 0 0 ® 0 O a 0 , ~ 42 STEEL GUARDRAILS o I t BALLUSTERS ~ - o _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ g2~.4~ ~ 4TH F - 0 LOOR I © o o ® ® 0 0 LL 0 © e O © © 0 ~ Q~ B W 0 ~ ~ - ~ , 41-8 Q I 3RD FLOOR 3 _ ~ ~ e o 0 a o ® a o o a ~ Z - I 0 © _ _ _ 31'-O' U 2ND LEVEL 0 g a o ® o a o 0 518 PORTLAND CEMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ STUCCO OvER 8' CMU, TYP, e w _ ~ U OYERI-LEAD COILING OVERNEAp COILINCs 1ST LEVEL J,ja 0 i ~ ~ STEEL DOORS TYP. ~ STEEL DOORS, TYf? ~ ~ ~ " ~ i Z ~ r iq I I ` 0 -._.SJM. -21 _ - - - - - ~ - - - - 12'-~" U1 CONCRETE BARREL - ' A5 F 00 V. - STEEL DOORS, TYP. TILED ROOF _ 0 ~ .ALUMINUM FRENCH STEEL DODRS, TYP. I N ~ DOOR TYP. ° - 0-O REF.ELEY. LPL - • FORM AND POUR WATER LEVEL H 0 CONC. STEPS. 42' STEEL RAILS. ~ z Z I i GREGG HOL05WORTH LICENSE N0. AR 0017669 i I R P; P 1 r u 'N" ti M 9aL z O y LICENSE NO. ID THOMAS J. GRAHAM AA 0000752 NVJP pn I c- IF NI R M N 05-42 p 1 F T 1, 1( R A H ELEVATION 1 203 0 DATE DRAWN CHECKED z lilm NAMOS Ti - . - - ~ o ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ o~o~,~ N y ~C'1~~ Y. U N ~ ~ ~ ~ U O ~ ~ - C .C N ~ .C ~ C to O to U ~ N U L O i O V O O I C 'O ~ ~ 1 rh~~s~ ~ U U O C a~ ~ U N O ~ ~ ~ N ~ 3 C ~ ~ ~ N ~L C (6 m N O 'Q ~ ~ U V1 G O Q ~ ~ ' O N - U ~ N ~ ~ L Q- W L CORNICE ~ ~ N N ~ BARREL TILE ROOF PARAPET WALL -a > U O N O U C ~ C _A ~ N U ~ t O . ~ O ~ 68'_4" ~ N ~ ca o FABRIC AWNING O ~ ~ ~ U 4TH FLOOR ~ ° ~ ~ ~ i ro. _ Q.° a~Y ~ ~ ~ ORNAMENTAL o a~~o~.~ o~ = L RAILING 5T-8" ~ ~ ~ o 3~tD FEflOR ~ ° E ~cam~~ ALUMINUM CLAD E a~ WINDOW zar.c°~ 2ND LEVEL ~ ~ _ oa ~ a~ca~ v qua ~,~~QQ~ r o I ~ o ~ cu Q- 't3 ~ ,t,, ` C •V SCORED STUCCO ~ ~ .a ~ ~a N 'L- n ~ ~ - ~ ~ STOREFRONT 15T LEVEL i ~ = o FRENCH DOOR SAND FJNE FIASTOMFJZiC COATING OVER CEMENT PLASTER i rnrn ~v ~m j Dui tiff . i m~ m~ w~ ~ M - (6 V..O p m LL ~ m i U > 4: j ~ ~ ~ 3. 2 r ~ U r ~ ~ ` Q NU BARREL T11 BARREL T11E ROOF W PARAPET N ` FABRICAWNiTVG ALUMlNUAQ CLAL? / ¦ PARAPET WALL WINDOW Z ~v a F"- CORNICE ` ORNAMENTAL CORNICE - RAILING SAND FINE ELASTOMERIC { ~ ~ M M i ~ n~ n COATING OVER CEA~ENT ~ rI h Y/ N N i PLASTER FRENCH DOOR O W W Q O Q 68'-4° ~ a 4TH FLOOR ~ C Q G co ~ i p r n ~ r 57-8 ~ 0 ~ N ~ 3RD FLOOR ~ a~ - ~ Q ~ ~K,; ar ~ '3 m o ~ ~ ~ Q a~ m i~ ~ ~ a ~ 47 -0 M - ~ _ 2ND LEVEL ~ _ o ~ i ~ o J ~0 f ~ f ? ~ _ ~Du ? ~ i ~ ~ ? , „ L- ? _ rr i ?U ~ 4 31 0 OC mght.(3al~mDesgnAssoaates,PA ] ST LEVEL Au dghtsresenred. I ~ _ 1 ofG hamafles~nAssoa'ales~P ~ i Reproduction inwhole oe in pansis SCORED STUCCO striLtiyprohibded vrilhautthe priorwdtten pe~missionatQzhamDe;ignAswaales, STOREFRONT ~ I, i i PAandanysuchretroductionmay sub~dyoutoravSandlorpimin'elBabiGty underTitle 17 of theUdd~ ~atesP,ode. i I~ SCALE: 1116 - ~ -0 v , u7 ti M Q fl J F Q 't' W (Y 1 ~ w. ' U ~ Q BARREL TI[ i J BARREL TICEROOF 0 W U ALUMINUM CLAD PARAPET N FABRIC AWNING WINDOW N PARAPET WALL 0. CORNICE - CORNICE ~ ORNAMENTAL i SAND FINE ELASTOMERIC RAILING I COATING OVER CEMENT Z 0 I ,i PIASTER W FRENCH DOOR ' i ' ~ ~ ~ 68'-4" 7 Q L _ ~]TH FLOOR - H ~ LL o = ~ ~ 57.8 ~ 0 3RD FLOOR z 11 Et u u k4 4 I III El El REM= ? I ? i U LLJJ Li LJ LJ 4T 0" m Lid 2ND LEVEL 0 FIEI r7,' EIEq:Iq rp. EJEJ frI-Hj L-JET-T-] I_j -UFT J ll~::l -LJLJ El ? i 1ST LEVEL SCORED STUCCO STOREFRONT EAST ELEVATION GREGG HOLDSWORTH SCALE: 111 6"= l'-O" LICENSE NO. AR 0017669 BMW& THOMAS J. GRAHAM mark n LICENSE NO. AA s BECENEU C000752 8 2005 NOV 0 i, Pi.N(NGDEPARTMENT 05-42 F??N CITY OF C LEARWATER 11 . A204 DATE DRAWL CHECKED 1116105 MAULS TJG 1 ~I. 14 1 I SITE PLAN APPROVED CASE # rn~s' o~roRs 1 i. CASE TYPE c~ w~- DRC DATE << ~ I I CDB DATE ,z ~ os SIGNATURE I DATE ~Z ~ I. I I; I 1; ,I LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' INDEX LEGAL: i I PARCEL 1: y FoR ~ff`} COVER-SHEET 1 300-410 OSCEOLA AVENUE LOTS 1 THROUGH 7 AND THE 10 FOOT ALLEY LYING WEST OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 3 OF A.S. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIV1510N, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 64, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A~IPORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECIION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS i I FOLLOWS: ~ GENERAL NOTES 2 BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7 0 SAID A.D 8c JENNIE GATES SUBDIVISION: THENCE N.88'58'21"E, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF GEORGIA STREET ~1, (A 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY), A DISTANCE OF 21 ~~,75 FEET. TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (A 55 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE DEMOLITION PLAN 3 I~ ~ ~ a~ a SOUTH, ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 337.16 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE N89'58'02"W., A DISTANCE OF 211.11 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE A 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY ; THENCE N00'06'14"W. ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERL y ( ) ~ Y LINE OF LOT 4 THROUGH 7 OF SAID A.B. &JENNIE. CATES SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 333.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITE PLAN 4 PARCEL 2: LOTS A AND B OF BERGENS REPEAT, AS REGORGED IN PLAT BOOK 26, PAGE 41, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 1/3 OF LOT 2, BISON AVENUE AND THE WEST 1/3 OF LOT 3 OF JONES OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, AS RECORDED IN PLAT Hi, PAGE 13, PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH ~ GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 5 COUNTY, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART, ALSO TOGETHER WITH A VACATED ALLEY. AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY ALL LYING IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, BEING FURTHER. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: f )RIDA 33755 UTILITY PLAN 6 BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT B OF SAID BERGENS REPEAT; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE A ( 55 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY) AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS A AND B OF SAID BERGENS REPEAT; A DISTANCE OF 179.99 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE GENERAL DETAILS ' l OF JONES STREET; THENCE N89'49'45"W, ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID JONES STREET AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT A AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE EAST 1/3 OF LOT 2 AND THE WEST 1/3 OF LOT 3 OF SAID JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, A DISTANCE OF 186.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LJNE OF SAID EAST 1/3 OF LOT 2, .JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, A DISTANCE OF 179.99 FEET; THENCE 589'49'47"E, A DISTANCE OF 25.D0 FEET; THENCE NORTH, A DISTANCE OF 12.47 FEET; THENCE S89'49'47"E, A DISTANCE OF 161.65 FEET TO THE WESTERLY UTILITY DETAILS 8 CATION RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISGN AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 12.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LIFT STATION DETAIL 9 AND PARCEL #1 301 OSCEOLA AVENUE, 400 & 410 JONES STREET ~ ~ "INVESTIGATE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE" ~ , THE WEST 2/3 OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, JONES SUBD'VISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDI110N TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, ACCORDING TO THE.PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS. OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART OF, LESS THE NORTHWEST CORNER: AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: f°_ BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, OF SAID JONES SUBDIVISION FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE N.00'23'00"W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID + r LOT 2, 169.80 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE, (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET; A TANGENT OF 8.07 FEET; A CHORD OF 15.55 FEET; A PARCEL 1: 09-29-15'14310-000-008 CHORD BEARING N.49'42'46"E), A DISTANCE OF 15.96 FEET; THENCE N.89'41'08"E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, 41.77 FEET; THENCE S.00'23'00"E., 180.00 FEET; -000-0080 THENCE S.89'41'06"W., 53.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ~ 404 N, OSCEOLA AVENI .AAVENUE I~ ° PARCEL#2 CLEARWATER FL FL THE SOUTH 76 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT PARCEL 2: 09-29-15-14310-000-010 BOOK 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART, TOGETHER WITH THAT CERTAIN TRACT -000_0100 CALL SUNSHINE ®1-800-432-4770 OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THE WEST LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND AND THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. OF OSCEOLA AVENUE, LYING AND BEING IN PINELLAS COUNTY, FL STATUTE 553.851 (1979) REQUIRES A • A A~ /C A I I I E ~11N. OF 2 DAYS AND I~AX. OF 5 FLORIDA. 400 N. OSCEOLA AVENI I"1 /-1 V G ~ V V DAYS NOTICE BEFORE YGU EXCAVATE. PARCEL#3 ~ CLEARW ATE R FL FL BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT .,c~LQCK 2, OF THE JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S - PARCEL 3. 09-29-15-00000-430 04 ~ 0 ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HA.P,BOR, ACCORDING ~0'THE CORRECTED MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF -430-0400 s VICINITY MAP - d _ HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, 'OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART; RUN THENCE N00'23'00"W., ALONG THE. EAST UNE OF SAID LOT 1 157 FEET. FOR A - i . , . , " ~ 314 N: OSCEOLA AVENI POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE S.79'2406 Vv., 80.E' FEET; THENCE S.004400 W., 12.21 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 79.25 FEET, MORE ! .AAVENUE ~ , X~ i o , OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT; THL'FJ'..-F, NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 27 FEET MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLEARWATER FL j C ~l ~ ~ ~~-a _ _ ; PARCEL 4: 09-29-15-00000-430-060 AND , -430-0600 t~ ~ ~ ~ e~ N P _ 0 HYSICAL ADORES 302 308 OSCEOLA AVENUE ADDRESS , z\`,; j , ~ FROM CLEARWATER FL THE SOUTHWEST (SW) CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, ~ FL ,~7`~ ~g g- RUN WEST 398.68 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE; .THENCE NORTH 4 DEGREES 38 MINUTES EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE 545.68 FEET TO' THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY AS SHOWN IN JONES SUBDIVISION TO THE TOWN OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA• THENCE EAST 5 . PARCEL 5: 09-29-15-00000-430- ~ 8 0 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING' THENCE NORTH O5O -430-0500 ~~T ~ , 83.16 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE WEST 250.55. FEET MORE OF LESS TO THE WATERS OF CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE SOUTH 22 1/2 DEGREES WEST 90.01 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT 285 FEET WEST OF THE POINT ;OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST 285.0 FEET TO POINT BEGINNING.. TOGETHER WITH ALL SUBMERGED LAND A RIPARIAN RIGHTS 312 N. OSCEOLA AVENI APPURTENANT TO SAID TRACT DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: X ~ .AAVENUE ~ ~ ' s~ P=- ' _ CLEARWATER FL AC 23, FROM AN INTERSEC110N OF THE NORTH LINE OF JONES STREET AND THE WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE OF JONES SUBDIVISION IN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; RUN NORTH ALONG WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE 190 FEET; THENCE WEST 213.9 FEET TO AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER BAY TO .POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE FL 11 ~ ~ ~ I~ PARCEL 6. 09-29-15-53370-000-0011 725 FEET TO CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE 725 FEET TO CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG EAST SIDE OF CHANNEL A DISTANCE OF ti PROJEC ~X~. i ~ t, ~ 000-0010. ~ a VICINITY 83.17 FEET DUE NORTH; THENCE EAST 725 FEET TO AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE IN A SOUTHWESTERLY COURSE ALONG THE AVERAGE HIGH i WATER LINE TO POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN ORDER FOR TAKING FILED JANUAR 3 NO PHYSICAL ADORES, Y 1 , 1961, IN O.R. BOOK 1083, PAGE 97, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ADDRESS o I-1~. CLEARWATER FL LOTS A AND B OF CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH ALL SUBMERGED LANDS, BAY BOTTOMS AND RIPARIAN RIGHTS THEREUNTO APPERTAINING OR IN ANYWISE BELONGING, MORE PARTICULARLY •000 0020 LH X&ORY PNMffNI I PARCEL 7. 09-29-15-53370-000-0021 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: i BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST COR NO PHYSICAL ADORES, NER OF CLOVIS C.; LUTZ SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND RUN N.T.S. ADDRESS I- - THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 06'15" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 65.48 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 54'00" WEST 630.0. FEET MORE OR LESS TO CLEARWATER FL THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERLY ~ FL ~ BOUNDARY OF SAID CHANNEL, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID COLVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE 637.0 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPER Y S SU PARCEL 09-29-15-07940-000- 2 T I BJECT TO OO AN EASEMENT TO THE WEST COAST INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT ON THAT. PART LYING WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE. WEST COAST INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY •000-0021 ~.t:,.: CANAL, CONTAINING 0.28 ACRE, MORE OR LESS. 300 N. OSCEOLA AVENI ,AAVENUE THAT PART OF A CERTAIN TEN (10) FEET OF UNtJAMED ALLEY EXTENDING WEST TO THE WATERS OF CLEARWATER HARBOR FROM THE WEST G RI HT OF WAY OF OSCEOLA CLEARWATER FL AVENUE AND LYING SOUTH OF THE FREILER PROPERTY AND.LYING NORTH OF LOT A OF CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76, PUBLIC ~ FL RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID ALLEY HAVING BEEN VACATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS SHOwN DN QUIT CLAIM DEED FR PARCEL 9: 09-29-15-44352-002-001( OM A.K. FREILER AND SARAH RAY FREILER, HIS WIFE, IN O.R. 589, PAGE 289, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA... •002-0010 A PARCEL OF SUBMER ~ GED LAND IN CLEARWATER .HARBOR IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 50UTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED NO PHYSICAL ADORES, , , AS FOLLOWS: ADDRESS CLEARWATER FL FL BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF THE CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT BEING ON THE AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER HARBOR, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING 555.97 FEET NORTH AND 1949.66 FEET WEST OF PARCEL 10:.09-29-15-44352-002-001, THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, FRAM AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN THENCE N89 DEGREES 24'16" WEST, 282.41 FEET TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER •002-0012 SECT. 9, TWN. 29 S., RNG.15 E. BULKHEAD LINE; THENCE RUN N07 DEGREES 28'50" EAST,10.07 FEET ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE; RUN THENCE 589 DEGREES 24'16" EAST, 281.21 FEET TO THE AVERAGE ~ NO PHYSICAL ADORES, HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER HARBOR; RUN THENCE S00 DEGREES 38 OD WEST 10.00 FEET ALONG SAID AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ADDRESS I ~ LOCATION MAP ~ r w ~IFrrl~ AND CLEARWATER FL 500 N. FT. HARRISON AVENUE PAR EL C 11.09-29-15-44352-002-002C t a 002-0020 V ? j ~ ~ ~ ~5 4 ,M ~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ ,a , ~~t ~ GIIVq~ ~~:C,,r~.~„r~r _.'s~Yf'~ a ;i, ~ ~i~~~ ~ RED LOTS 1 AND 2 HARRINGTON'S SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 77, ACCORDING TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. NO PHYSLCAL ADORES, ADDRESS ~ ~ ~ a - cans, ~r 4 ~ _ PARCEL A j' ~ Eck i, ~ ~ ~~1~3e11 - r .,1._0 `=t ~ ~~llun~.. - CLEARWATER FL LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11 & ALL OF GEORGIA STREET LYING NORTH OF .SAID LOT 8, A.B. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 64 OF THE PUBLIC ~ FL - ~ -P.~~-~~~ NOV 2 3 ?005 RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 12: 09-29-15-00000-430-030( '430-0300 ~ a~~v F~~ CIIYpFG a:PARiM TOGETHER WITH: I 309 OSCEOLA AVENUE PARCEL B ~ Er ~ CkE,gRVJATER AVENUE ~ ~ E BEGINNING WHERE THE WEST LINE OF NORTH OSCEOLA STREET, IN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, OR THE WEST. LINE OF SAID STREET EXTENDED NORTH AS SAID NOR TH QSCEOLA CLEARWATER FL FL r ~ ~ m r c',' _r c STREET EXISTED ON OCTOBER 8, 1894, INTERSECTS THE SOUTH LINE OF A THREE ACRE TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY OWNED BY MARY C. NICHOLSON, WHICH SAID TRACT IS DESCRIBED AS (BEGINNING 17.85 CHAINS WEST f~P,)D 8.28 CHAINS NORTH OF THE S.E. CORNER OF SEC. 9, TWP. 29 S., RANGE 15 E, THENCE NORTH 2.52 CHAINS TO A PARCEL 13.09-29-15-14310-000-001( STAKE, THENCE RUN WEST 11.40 CHAINS TO A S;fAKE, AT LOW WATER MARK ON CLEARWATER BAY, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE MEANDERINGS OF SAID BAY 2.75 CHAINS 000-0010 ~ ~h ~<<~ c~~ :~te~ ~ ~ -.w ~ ~ MORE OR LESS TO A POINT DUE WEST OF THE STARTING; THENCE EAST 12.40 CHAINS MORE OR LESS TO A POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 3 ACRES MORE OR LESS' 41 O N, OSCEOLA AVENI THENCE RUN EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NICHOLSON TRACT 58 FT. FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 84 FT., THENCE EAST 70 FT., THENCE SOUTH 84 FT., THENCE EAST 70 FT., THENCE SOUTH 84 FT., THENCE WEST 7D FT. TO POINT OF BEGINNING, IT BEING THE INTENTION HEREBY AAVENUE _ ~.w :E; ~ ~ TO CONVEY THE LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY J.E. ELDRIDGE TO JAMES E. BEARING AND ROSE B. SCARLING BY DEED DATED APRIL 10 1922 FILED SAME DATE A CLEARWATER FL ND ~ FL r~ PROJECT RECORDED IN DEED RECORD 116, PAGE 67, PUBLIC RECORDS DF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL C t. ~F~ ~ LOCATI O ALSO, BEGIN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND HERETOFORE DESCRIBED AND HEREBY CONVEYED RUN THENCE WESTERL Y ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT 37; FEET 6 INCHES FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID ABOVE ~ .t ~ N DESCRIBED TRACT WESTERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST~jCORNER OF SAID TRACT, THENCE SOUTHE 7 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO POINT OF BEGINNING BEING A p p,F ~ r ~_G*~SV k'~~tri71~ -6'~ ,y ld ~y"fii.' {i ? ~lfJ I~~~l ~r w- ~~9_ TRIANGULAR PIECE OF LAND, IT BEING THE INTENTION BY THIS DESCRIPTION TO CONVEY THAT CERTAIN SMALL TRIANGULAR PARCEL OF LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY THE ~ i. - g ~ R Jcx~',:. ~ A~ 19i CITY OF CLEARWATER TO JAMES B. SCARING BY SEED DATED DECEMBER 13, 1922, FILED DECEMBER 14, .1922, RECORDED IN DEED RECORD 133, PAGE 483, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~d TOGETHER WITH: ' ' ~ - PARCEL D r - - - - Ci11LENC~lN~~RINC~ LaNDSCAFLAKCNITLC T( :I 11TLCFURL PUNNING BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, COUNTY OF PINELLAS, STATE OF FLORIDA, WHERE THE WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE INTERSECTS THE SOUTH LINE OF GEORGIA STREET, RUN THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE 200 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT ELEVEN O11 , OF PV NOTE GATES suBDlvlsIo 7011)ATCEZ.1S 56 R~..1D C, -SUITE 404 N, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, _ FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID O.SCEOLA AVENUE 49 FEET MORE OR LESS TO, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WHAT 5141 LTY H il~l3~R FL~RIVA 34695 IS KNOWN AS THE OLD JOHN E. LAMBETH PROPERTY, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID LAMBETH LINE TO THE HIGH WATER MARK ON CLEARWATER BAY;- THENCE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID HIGH WATER MARK JO SOUTH LINE OF SAID'.LOT ELEVEN (11) OF SAID CATES' SUBDIVISION. EDITIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND CITY OF uj;~ PH~~NC 727.793.9888 THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. Drawing rntle INAX: 727.793.9855 TOGETHER WITH: , ~ FMAfI,: KFIi~iCi~I=fTH7Ak'~1~..C,~ ~,hA - - COVER °z y PARCEL E THOSE SUBMERGED LANDS DESCRIBED IN OR BOOKS 3515, PAGE 221, OR 3557, PAGE 559 AND OR 1324, SHEET PAGE 520 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Agency App. / Permit No. Date w Date Issued / Date Expires NZA pro} No.: 324-03 Q SWFWMD FDOT Owner prof, No.: NA J CITY OF CLEARWATER FLD2005-04034 Scale: SEE SHEETS Sheet No. Z 0 co T of 9 Q 1 . is f ~I { r i iJ z f z GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES CLEARING AND SITE PREPARATION ~aNOTES WATER SYS JVATER SYSTEM NOTES DRAINAGE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE NAVD (1988). 1. PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING, ALL TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN ON THE CONSTRUCTION 1. A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE HES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SANITARY SEWERS 1. STANDARD INDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FDOT "ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC ~ CANNOT BE ACHIEVED BY ADJUSTING WATER MAINS DESIGN STANDARDS". ~ IJ PLANS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY'S AND WATER MAINS. IF CLEARANCE CANNOT BE 2. LOCATIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND'C~IMENSIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND TREE ORDINANCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THESE TREES THE SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED f CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE IRON CLASS 54 A MINIMUM ~ OTHER FEATURES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE IN GOOD CONDITION. NO TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT WRITTEN OF 10 FEET ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CONFLICT fHE CONFLICT POINT. AS AN ALTERNATIVE THE 2. ALL STORM SEWER .PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE CLASS III (ASTM C-76) WITH TIME OF PREPARATION OF TEiESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. ONLY "GRADING BY HAND" IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CANOPY SANITARY SEWER MAY BE PLACED IN A SLEEVE IN A SLEEVE OR ENCASED IN CONCRETE FOR THE RUBBER GASKET JOINTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES f j ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES. AND OTHER LINE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. REQUIRED 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CON OF THE CONFLICT POINT. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS UNLESS ~ V FEATURES AFFECTING THIS WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS... O Q FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER MAINS `n 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PREPARE THE SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION 2. A HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET SHALL E 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK PLANS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS TESTING REPORT. COPIES OF THE SOILS REPORT ARE AND SANITARY SEWER. 3. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND TO THE CENTER OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES J CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY AVAILABLE THROUGH THE OWNER OR THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. QUESTIONS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MITERED END AND FLARED END SECTIONS WHICH ARE ~1 CONFLICT BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA. 3, ALL WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3( REGARDING SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SOILS .REPORT ARE TO 42 BELOW FINISHED GRADE. MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES AND A MAXIMUM OF INCLUDED IN LENGTHS. ~ t. n BE DIRECTED TO THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. ;ONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRATES AND COVERS WITHIN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE u~ ~ 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED UTILITIES AND 4. ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES IN 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ONLY THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE NECESSARY SPECIFICATIONS. TRAFFIC RATED FOR H-20 LOADINGS. r } ~ ~ n ORDER TO PERMIT MARKING THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN FOR CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, OR PLANTED WITH `~J rT ~J ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION, BY CALLING FLORIDA SUNSHINE STATE ONE -CALL CENTER OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER AND STORM OR SANI TORM OR SANITARY SEWER TO BE RESOLVED BY 5. CONTRACTOR TO SOD THE DETENTION POND AS INDICATED ON PLANS WITHIN ONE WEEK ~ ~ J OF FLORIDA, INC. AT 1-800-432-4770. ADJUSTING THE WATER LINES AS NECESSARY. JECESSARY. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND. ,7 ~ G 4. THE TOP 4° TO 6" OF GROUND REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES, STOCKPILED AT A SITE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO BE .USED FOR. LANDSCAPING 6. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW-OFFS ZY BLOW-OFFS AT THE END OF WATER SERVICE 6. ALL STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES DEEPER THAN TEN (10) FEET TO HAVE LADDER BARS. ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE WORK PERFORMED PURPOSES, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. LATERALS TO ASSURE ADEQUATE FLUSHING AND 'LUSHING AND DISINFECTION. ~ r` U'm r~ BY THE CONTRACTOR. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE .FOR OBTAINING THE NECESSARY DEWATERING PERMITS FROM z ~ 1 " m a . 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF .OFF- 7. RESTRAINING JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL )VIDED AT ALL FITTINGS AND HYDRANTS AS SHOWN ON THE. LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY. ~ ~ ; ,r r R ~ V ~ ~ 6. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE IN PLACE AND TESTED OR INSPECTED PRIOR TO SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. DETAILS. ROADWAY BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCTION.. 8. PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWERS SYSTEMS: ~ " s ~ 6. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR TO REMOVING 8. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR W? HODS FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION .SYSTEM SHALL BE DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM SEWER INLETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT ~ ...1 ~ ~ ~ J r~; 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PERMIT AND ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES. PIN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY F REGULATORY AGENCY CODES, PLANS, AND SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, SOD, STONE, ~ U ~ : ? ~ INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST REV N, LATEST REVISION THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENTAL ETC.> WHICH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MODIFIED AS REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION ~ ~f~ - ~ ~ CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND. 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES TO SPECIFICATIONS THERETO. APPROVAL AND .CONS JAL AND .CONSTRUCTION OF ALL POTABLE WATER PROGRESS. )NNECTIONS MUST BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ACCORDING TO AGENCY INSTRUCTION. DISCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO REMOVING OR DEMOLISHING ANY SERVICE MAIN EXTENSIONS AND CONNECTIONS M EXISTING STRUCTURES FROM THE SITE. LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY. DEPARTMENT OF PU ~TMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES. 9. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE 8. ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO SHALL BE OF LATEST REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE 1N ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND E~ Z ~ AND/OR LATEST EDITION. 8. THE ,LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED 9. ALL UNDERGROUND PVC SHALL BE DR14 (C-9C DR14 (C-900). THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD Z O ~ FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, 1996, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENTAL ~ W ~ ~ 9. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. ACCURACY PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. IT SHALL BE THE SPECIFICATIONS THERETO. a ~j ~ ~ CONTRACTOR'S/SUBCONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTILITIES 10. CLASS "B" TYPE I BEDDING. SHALL BE USED UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE ~ ~d, 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER SHOP AND TO MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANY RELOCATIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS, OR BY THE ENGINEER. ~ a x w DRAWINGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS. FAILURE TO OBTAIN ~ EXERCISE CAUTION UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL WATER SYSTEM TESTING AND STING AND-INSPECTION REQUIREMENT NOTES 11. ,AI;L ROUND REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE JOINTS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVEWAYS, W ~ ~ APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLATION MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT WHEN CROSSING ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY, WHETHER SHOWN ON CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE PLANS OR LOCATED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY. .ALL UTILITIES WHICH INTERFACE WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED BY THE 1. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, INCLUI SYSTEM, INCLUDING FITTINGS, THRUST BLOCKING, ' Ai~J' SIDEWALKS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-oF-WAY, AND ANY OUTFACE SYSTEM SHALL Q ~ O ~ 11. AT LEAST 3 WORKING DAYS PR!OR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND THE CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR AND SHALL COOPERATE WITH THE HYDRANTS, CONNECTIONS, AND VALVES SHALL Rf _VES SHALL REMAIN UNCOVERED UNTIL PROPERLY BE ~'~'RAPPED WITH MIRAFI 14 ON FILTER FABRIC OR EQUAL FABRIC TO BE A MIN. ~ / PRESSURE TESTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNS THE ENGINEER AND APPROPR;ATE AGENCIES AND SUPPLY THEM-WITH-ALL APPROVED UTILITY COMPANIES DURING RELOCATION OPERATIONS. ANY DELAY GR INCONVENIENCE BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER. PRESSURE TESTS TO 0'r` 30" 1N WIDTH AND CENTERED ON PIPE. a )EPARTMENT SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO Z O Z ~ SHOP DRAWINGS, THE CONTRACTOR'S. NAME, STARTING DATE, PROJECTED SCHEDULE, CAUSED TO THE CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR BY THE VARIOUS UTILITIES SHALL BE BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER DEPARTMENT SI / NOTIFY OWNERS ENGINEER AND COUNTY INSPEC AND OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. ANY WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO NOTIFYING INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED. ouNTY INSPECroRS 4s HouRS IN ADVANCE of TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS THE ENGINEER OR WITHOUT AGENCY INSPECTOR PRESENT MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL PERFORMING TESTS. Y ~ ,~~t . AND REPLACEMENT AT THE C'ONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 1. ir3' ;ORM DRAINAGE PIPING SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION ~ ~ U 2. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM CHLORINATION AND BA CLEARANCE OF DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM. COPIE' JATION AND BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLING AND OBTAIN ~.,'>;,~;E OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL. CONTRACTOR iYSTEM. COPIES OF ALL BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS TO TC~-;NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION. 12. WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL INTERFACE SMOOTHLY WITH OTHER BE SUBMITTED TO 'S NG NEER. EER. , WORK BEING PERFORMED OF1-SITE BY OTHER CONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES. IT OWNER E I WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE HIS 2. .THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS UNTIL FINAL ACTIVITIES, WHERE NECESSARY WITH OTHER CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY COMPANIES. PAVING AND GRADING NOTES. A~,CEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT. THE STORM SYSTEM WILL BE INSPECTED BY THE OWNER'S E"~fGWEER PRIOR TO APPROVAL FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PURPOSES, 13. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXCAVATIONS AGAINST CONDITION OR BETTER. COLLAPSE AND WILL PROVIDE BRACING SHEETING OR SHORING AS NECESSARY. .TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BEING PLACED, 14. REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFFECTED. BY THIS DEWATERING SHALL BE USED AS REQUIRED. SANITARY SEb NITARY SEWER NOTES ` ~ WORK SHALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING CONDITIONS BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION WORK UNLESS SPECIFICALLY 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE NECESSARY DEWATERING PERMITS FROM 1. A HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET SHALL B FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND I SAFETY NOTES 1. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR MAINTENANCE OF THIS PROJECT, ALL SAFETY rr~~~ EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS, ADDITIONAL COSTS ARE INCIDENTAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION THE LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY. SANITARY SEWER. REGULATIONS ARE TO BE ENFORCED. THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL ~J Q ~ AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION IS TO BE ALLOWED. CONFORM WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL AND SAFETY OF THE TRAVELING'PUBLIC AND THE ~ 3. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED PAVEMENT OR GROUND SURFACE 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER WORK SHALL CONFORM WIT 15. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED ARE TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON DRAWINGS. SPECIFICATIONS. SAFETY OF HIS PERSONNEL. LABOR SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE ~ O W TO FOOT STANDARDS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS PROVISIONS SET FORTH BY OSHA IN THE' FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF a E-+ ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD HAVE BEEN 4. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO FIELD ADJUST PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS TO PRESERVE THE ROOT SYSTEMS OF TREES SHOWN TO BE SAVED. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S 3. SANITARY SEWER MAINS AND LATERALS SHALL HA' ALS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF THREE (3) FEET TRANSPORTATION.. ~ ~ ~ OBTAINED. ANY WASHOUTS, REGRADING, RESEEDING, AND GRASSING WORK, AND OTHER AND SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCOMPANIED BY A M EROSION WORK REQUIRED, WILL. BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY ELEVATION CHANGES. 'ANTED BY A METAL TAPE SIMILAR TO "TERRATAPE" 2. THE MINIMUM STANDARDS AS SEf FORTH IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STATE OF / COLORED GREEN AND LAID ONE FOOT ABOVE TH UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR. MAINTENANCE BY THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND DOT ABOVE THE PIPE. FLORIDA, MANUAL ON TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SAFE PRACTICES FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY ~ ENGINEER 0 CO - 5. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A 1/2 BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL WITH SEALER F RE RD AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE. CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND UTILITY OPERATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED IN THE ~ W DESIGN APPLICATION, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, WARNING DEVICES, AND BARRIERS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE ~ 16. CHAPTER 77-153 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIRES THAT AN EXCAVATOR NOTIFY ALL GAS UTILITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING. MAPS SHOW 6. ALL PAVEMENT. MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO FOOT STANDARD INDEX N0. 17346, PUBLIC AND WORKMEN FROM HAZARDS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. r~ ONLY THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION S S. SHEETS 1-7. OF GA MAINS AND DO NOT SHOW SERVICE LINE THE I r~ ONLY SAFE AND PROPER WAY TO LOCATE EITHER MAINS OR SERVICE LINES IS BY AN ON- 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL TRIM, TACK, AND MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AT LOCATIONS WHERE. SANITARY SEWER TESTING AND SITE INSPECTION BY THE RESPECTIVE GAS PERSONNEL. THEREFORE, EXCAVATORS ARE NEW PAVEMENT MEETS EXISTING PAVEMENT. ,STING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENT NOTES 3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MARKINGS AND DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET ~ W FORTH IN THE MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PREPARED BY THE U.S. INSTRUCTED TO TELEPHONE THE RESPECTIVE GAS COMPANY TWO WORKING DAYS 1. ALL GRAVITY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SUBJECT T BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION.. ~ ~ ~ .BEFORE ENTERING A CONSTRUCTION AREA.. ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINE 8. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL/SEDIMENTATION BARRIER (HAY BALES Y THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE ~ Z 4, IT SHALL BE THE .SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY AND ENFORCE ° ~ OR SILTATION CURTAIN} TO PREVENT SILTATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STREETS, INSPECTION. 17. RECORD. DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE. FOR RECORDING AND STORM SEWERS. IN ADDITION CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE STRAW MULCH OR OTHER P.LL APPLICABLE SAFEfI' REGULATIONS. THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED ~ INFORMATION ON A SET OF THE APPROVED PLANS CONCURRENTLY WITH CONSTRUCTION SUITABLE MATERIAL ON GROUND IN AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION RELATED TRAFFIC IS FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE OWNER OR W PROGRESS. WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION THE CONTRACTOR. ENGINEER WILL INSPECT AND/OR ENFORCE SAFETY REGULATIONS. ~ ~ Z SHALL SUBMIT ONE 1 SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER. THE TO ENTER AND EXIT THE SITE. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER AND/OR LOCAL FINAL RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: AUTHORITIES, EXCESSIVE QUANTITIES OF EARTH ARE TRANSPORTED OFF-SITE EITHER w w BY NATURAL DRAINAGE OR BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE O O w ~ ~ 2 d a ~ SAID EARTH TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND/OR AUTHORITIES. 1. DRAWINGS TO BE LEGIBLY MARKED TO RECORD ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION. 9. IF WIND EROSION BECOMES SIGNIFICANT DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR 2. DRAWINGS SHALL .SHOW ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL WATER AND WASTEWATER SHALL STABILIZE THE AFFECTED AREA USING SPRINKLING IRRIGATION OR OTHER Y Y m PIPING AND RELATED APPURTENANCES, BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND. ALL ' CHANGES TO PIPING LOCATION INCLUDING HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF ACCEPTABLE METHODS. UTILITIES & APPURTENANCES SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND REFERENCED TO i PERMANENT SURFACES IMPROVEMENTS. .DRAWINGS SHALL ALSO SHOW ACTUAL 10. THERE IS TO BE NO DISCHARGE (LE. PUMPING, SHEET FLOW, SWALE, DITCH, ETC.) INTO EXISTING DITCHES OR CANALS WITHOUT THE USE OF SETfLING;PONDS. IF THE 3~ INSTALLED PIPE MATERIAL, CLASS, ETC. CONTRACTOR DESIRES TO DISCHARGE INTO THE EXISTING DITCHES OR CANALS A az J ~ 3. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL FIELD CHANGES OF DIMENSION AND DETAIL INCLUDING CHANGES MADE BY FIELD ORDER OR BY CHANGE ORDER. SETTLING POND PLAN PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND ~ ~ O APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD_AND LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY PRIOR TO 4. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL DE7AIL5 NOT ON ORIGINAL CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION, DRAWINGS BUT CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD. ALL EQUIPMENT. AND PIPING }O ° ~ ~ O RELOCATION SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN. U U W W ~ 5. LOCATIONS OF ALL MANHOLES, HYDRANTS, VALVES, & VALVE BOXES SHALL BE F- d U SHOWN. ALL VALVES~;SHALL BE REFERENCED FROM AT LEAST TWO (2) AND PREFERABLY THREE (3) PERMANENT POINTS. ORIGINAL ~ ~ o RECENED W I NOV 2 3 2005 o a w PAVING & GRADING TESTING AND INSPECTION RE UIREMENTS PLANNING DEPARTMENT N ° Q 0 O CITY OF CLEARWAiER ° ° 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS .RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING APPLICABLE TESTING WITH THE N O Z SOILS ENGINEER. f~W>-(A-OZVI 2, SOILS ENGINEER TO SUPPLY, THE ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL COMPACTION TESTS AND ASPHALT RESULTS. THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO CERTIFY TO THE ENGINEER i W i ~ W Z OF RECORD IN WRITING THAT ALL TESTING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL z REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR LLJ E THE IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. PLANS SHALL SUPERCEDE SPEC BOOKS ui Z~ 3. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW SOIL REPORTS AND BORINGS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT nom. ;e I AND COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. w ~ 71 Z5 IF A DISCREPANCY OCCURS CHECK PLANS ~ AND CONTACT ENGINEER IN WRITING ~U. ;z W DRAWN BY: RJM CHECK BY. KEZ i ORIGINAL DATE: 08.17.04 SHEET 2 OF 9 r 1 , i MN ~ ISM SPACING OF POSTS ~ ~ o p E M M° ' o0 a ' 346`• aln ~M ! J TO BE 6-10 FEET APART FLTER FABRIC Q Ln 5' MATERIAL ~ p 49. 49.5' 31.33: , N a °h{ . ' 0 30,99 , . , , p p i O SNIT Y ANNE . _ ' 0. NARRINGTON' SUBDI ~1SION N C®NT$ACTORG$ RI EL = 1.31Q a 1 SANITARY MANHOLE ' W 0. MARRING RIM EL = 28.86 U 1.4' x 1.4' CONCRETE COLUMNS (J) FND dc`REM©19E ALL EX T. s IE = 2 2509 L FND N N U~ILITIES'F,R~MaPR JE 6' v(~RU NIN ~ ~ ti ;;~~~~ql I' WITH WOOD FENCE (TYP) N IE =-21.57 on 0 ~ m LB6969 PZA~~4 NEIE-25.04 0 ~rn LB6969 PZA~~(9i~K 5, PnAGED77 SITS ; 'o T RU AN OLE OP d ~ -1 ~ill~ ' 3 a®~B 9. f A I \ C L L 3043'UE ~ M E 1~~3 8.7 ° ~ i~~~ VIII II POOL DECK SE IE = 22.94 NN 28.92 w w p 3 a 20.D7 -._.F COLUMN CORNER W IE = 21.57 } " _ BP SND TAINING WALL16.3 18.51 0.3' N x 0.2' E FXC a 8.99~o g' ~ 12.55 4,15 CONCRETE RE - - _ _ > 26.6 a °a 58'8°~q • d , . ~ ~ /e CO TRA TO T d R~ °a S$8°~+4,,D ,.W 1.1.x.95': F .:1 qq~,`~R g.~ , - - - - io^4"12.19" _ . 6 W1Q M e p. 4 M s ~ Il FXC CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 14" ~ ~iS WV GAS 28.19 1 ~ 06 ° , ~67,~° AL EXI TINQiISI AG (r1 894 M 30, 30.86 LIG T P LESLF 1 #101 21.12 27.51 27.6D 11D3 R=2.0 2 .00 28.41 ~ MCP 28,76 28.72 FENCE 38:2 ~R os SRE.:a : GRAPHIC SCALE ~ J 2a.72 o~lA STREEZ 3a,7o 31.16 ~ ~ ~ ° U FOR ADDITIONAL SiRENGTH 14" ~R=50 ~ 6.91 27.20 SANITARY MANF~~ A CP i ~ ' FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN 1110 V POB BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH (MAX) R=3.5 12" 14" } RIM EL = 27.52 POB SH WIRE SCREEN WHICH HAS E IE = 21.90 i i 4 3D 0 15 30 60 SOUTI~~ LY LINE - AS 3D P B ~ ~ BEEN FASTENED TO THE POSTS ~ #i 20 ~ ~04p GEORGIA S IE ~2k99 PARCEL THREE \ \ BACKFlLLED TRENCH R 4.0 #iD9 12" R S ~ 23,1 = 23.11 61 a', , 12' 14" ~ ~ R=2.5 #105 ~ ° 26.23 21,22 RCEL 0 E 1- 14" #114 #113 R=4.5 11 23° 6.4 PA E 2 4Q . IJ 15 R-3.5 R=4.5 112 5.8 14^ #106 ,~pp #102 23.7 ~ ~ R=4.5 ~ 1106 ~R=4,5 Y`(R=3,5 R=4.5 C R R Ol~-'~ (IN FEET) O ~ l .a , ~ D B 21 I; 1 inch = 30 ft. , R-3 F F 3' FOP 1 1 1 196 11" o 24.9' N s o.1' az' _ r~ #116 FIR 5/ " L I ~ 16' R=2.0 7 R=2.5 f6" s 1 . ~1 = ~ 3776 I 16 ~r 5 ~=4.5 U FLTER FABRIC( ~ J R 5.0 N #9 MaTERlA1 sectl~Lr ATTACHING TW'0 SILT FENCES 12" S D 3 ~ 5.4 1' # 07 y R=3.0 M FASTENm THE D #111 11" 4.0 22.5 ° ~ / 3 POSTS OR I SED Q ~ R=5.D #119 THE WIRE - - - R=4.51 ~ ; . P ~ PARCEL ~ J f a ~B~ OR 3515, PG 2 12" 1 #121 l APPROXIMATELY B M' p INCHES OF FlLTER PLACE THE END 12 R=2. D^ 4.5 194 . I ~ J ~ ~ rJ Q 'L_ LEGEND p ~ FABRIC MATERIAL ~ POST OF THE #118 ~ # ^ MUST EXTEND INTO cb R-4.5 12" ~FC~3.5 1 3p, T 1 I 30. ~ ~ ~ J, ~u A TRENCH AND BE SECOND FENCE 1123 R-2. 0 ~ ANCHORED WITH ~ INSIDE THE END N R=1.5 / p ~ 0.e 0.~ COMPACTED Q POST OF THE 16' ' 12` 12" 22.6 t2' 30 6 yr 29 [:l _ i m BAG(FlLL MATERIAL (Al 0. FlRST FENCE v #124 lfi" .r ~ B .1 193 22.9 #7 4*,5`6„1^7^ D R=3.5 I g• 187 R=3.5 ig• R= ' 76 ~ #66. E J x, Ir. WOOD OR d' ROTATE BOTH / 5.3 B6 R=3.5 12" 12° 53 ~ 12 R=3.0 6" -4.5 - STEEL POST i- POSTS AT (EAST # / -0'S 0 91 # - ~ ° i EXISTING ITEM/TREE TO BE REMOVED ~ ~ r~ ~ Y x 0 190 DEGREES IN ~ 53 5" R-2.5 ,~y # 5" R=3.0 152 #75 o - 10^ #85 71R-5.0 R=4.5 R=5.0 R= ,5 26,4 PLAYGROUND ~ RUNOFF ~ A CLOCKWISE _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° 26" -F-- a.. ~~Q M + M M •E N - RIG N'•. - ~ Z, L m h ~ m B~ / ^ ° R-D~ 1 ' 14s AREA / W DCREATE~A TIGHT ~ 6" ? R .0 #84/~ ~ 9 #92 151 x R=2.5 ~ W 16 ~ / R-2. 225 # R-4.0 ° . ~ ~ L r ~ N e n 1V` CrL.I NI~_ ~ SEAL WiTH THE J _ 6,5 _ ~Q 27.9 } 4 O R-1.5 -3.0 26.1 29.93 ' r\ FABRIC MAIERIAI R=4.Or #81 / ^ Q ~ 26.2 25.6 ~ 11 R-5.0 4,2 11.6 j-- -#25.6 28.7 C \ \ PARCEL E l n° 12" s's"5"4"a° 6" 9' 1 L6T 6 R / DIRECTION OF RUNOFF WATERS #19 ~ ~ 9 Sg 7° 4"1° 1 .6 ,-,~95 R=zS ~ ~ ' PAVEMENT BUILDING CURBING ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 10 INCHES \ \ 3515, PG 221 R=4s? #17 #7 3,7 175 R71.5 10°8 _ # g' ` 2 (MIN) ~ \ R=0.5 - 68 -2.0 R=2.0 57 56 ~ APPRO%IMATE f 1 1 DRIVE BOTH 10 f< R R-5.0 1 167 # # #55 A P~ 25.7 1 TO BE REMOVED 11~ > ~ z < O . d ,r C` UJ :L L. / 1 I 1 USiER 80 Q ~ 32" R-3.0 = 11 " R=1.5 R-2.0 \ ~ 4-INCH BY - POSTS ABOUT 10 # I 15^ 13 R 20 62 61 ~R=2.5 B° 1 ' / / _ g i INCHE INTO THE R-3.ih I ~ Pr ~ 18. ' 4 IN H TRENCH GROUND AND =4.r 32 112 #69 =1,~ R=1.D 11"9° #50 FjC3 3"X3'# ~ IIE = 25.2 25.7 13 7 8' w° o ' \ \ BURY MP ~ #14 R=S.D ^ R=4.0 15^ 4 13'1"6"6°S" =2.0 R a +26,2 #92 i3 14" # E 0 M \ 28.7 P0° - - - - PROJECT LIMITS 0. R=3.5 ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ 1160 4.. y~$ 63 ~R=2.0 N ~ / R=3.5 10"11"1~ 88 } R=S' " 15" 14" ~°4.4^ #6`~ 2 28.0 A.i~2~2 JENNI GATES R=2,0 18" R= 0 1 ^ ~ `~Q ~7D SU8D1l/ 13 0 ~2" R= ~ I R=2.5 R-1.5 5 a ~ P. 2$.4 G. 64 #91 -3.0 M i SILT FENCE ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ CITY -OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA C(j ~ m 28.1 9.0 = u ~ PUBLIC WENGINE~INGISTRATION V p / 5,0 R=1.0 ~ " 28.35 1~T~89 ~ O Ln \ QQ ~ MANX BY INSTALIJNG A FlLTER ~ / I ~c s' R=3.0 ~ + W ~ ~ N 2.D' ~ ? M HH + ~ ~ U W W aEauo er FABRI SILT FENCE rao, O } ~ O 28.65 M o ~ ~ ~aY ' I I A. B. & JENNIE GATES SUBDIVISION 4D• Lo 5 Q PARCEL ' ~ ~ ~a o #73 2aD ~ ~n W 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL O a ~ ~ o OR 3557, PG 559 0 Q ~ I PB PG 64 R=4.D 4 o ~ m m / I ~ - w 4D' 28.4 7.3' Q ~ I-~ " ~ ~ w - O Cad 7°7"5" 4° 25° ~ 32 ~ # 5.9 w 129 _ laJ M " .}a, ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. ~ sn I • o• o ~ R-6.5 # e= I R=3.5 ~ ~ I + ;4, N ~ i W a' x ~ M ; Nils ~ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND Q ~ ~ ~ ~ 11° 9 ti~ a 13° #33 /A ~ #125 5., P R C L F O U R R=4.5 w R=X,,A 7.9 _ R=2.5 a PARCEL FOUR X I UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING SITE GEOMETRY WORK. ~ ~ ~ ~ r\ ~G 6 p ~ 25.9 Q i ~ ~ 5" 131 25.9 0 e ~ #126 R=2.5 7.° ~ ~ ' ' 3. WITH THE VACATION OF OSCEOLA AVENUE, ALL UTILITIES SHALL ~ ~ ~ ~ I 5,6 p c 25,9 LOT 4 X N I\\ fV n lull ; I•e. / 9 0" 7.3' ~M\l\I + ~ BE RELOCATED AND RECONNECTED AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE. ~ ~ ~ PARCEL E M 12 ar "N ti N ~ I #2s 3 ~ ~ < ~ OR 3557, PG 559 R=3.o o° co ~ I n' d ~ ~ ~ i1m ~1 ~ / Pxc w ~ I , ~ U O CLU~iFRS I 28" #27 17 #43 R=4.0 ~ I o ~ 125l CtUS S 26 21,2 R=3.010'#28 ~ ~ R=2.D = z ~ ~ 1' ~ ° PND L 21 W [l~ ; R= /A~ +7.1 # ,~y R=3.5 FIR 11/2„ ~~,,JJ1' ~ R=~ R ~ 13.8' LB 0 1 N 0.4' ~ ' II R=3. " ~ Q J TREE REMOVAL LIST (Harrison Village & Island View) PALM REMOVAL LIST (Harrison VIDage & Island View) dC 17" / t4• #20 / ~ r1N M , ~ 24 ~ R=.f'~ ~ ~ 40" h R=p, / 29° 111 G N M ~ ~ ~1 TreeNnmber Size 1~pe Ratin Tree Number Size ~ )~~p w ~ / I #19 / R=3.5 a 25.6 (n (n I ~ ~ D I~ 17 38" Live Oak 4.0 33 10" Saba1 Palm 3.0 ~ ? / APART OF SEC ION 9, TOWNSN ~ #e a / ~ ~ 1 ^ =3.0 ~ R=3. REMOVE EXIS 6" PARCEL E (G1 SOUTH R NGE 15F~ ST ~f~1C SAN MAIN M ~ + . a I ~38 35" Live Oak 3.5 34 10„ Sabel Palm 3.5 N 5.4 / `7.8 FIR 5/8" R 1324, PG 520 ~ t PLS 286 M J N 5° N 0.6' BP I _ f 40 7 Holly 3.5 48 12 Saba1 Palm 3.5 ~ ~ 122 / I i • ~ W 0.5' 42 26" Laurel0ak 3.0 49 12" Sabel Palm 3.5 ~ 46 30" Live Oak 3.0 50 10" Sabel Palm 4.5 12^22"26^ m ~ S '1' 10_6^ ~ ~2B°9" #127 I #18 N52 115 #14 _ 27 I 29.24 ^ w # 156 q^g°g•8 R-Lp R=3.5 # g^ -3.5 p R=1. " p 53 12" Latrrel0ak 3.0 51 10" Sabel Palm 3.0 f r 1 ~4 R- R=0.0 7.6 8,5 R- R=3U R=3.5 R=1.5 13 ~ 163 FCM 4"x4" ~ w M~ O 11' # _ R= ~ I rnN N (n ' 60 6" Hickory 3.0 52 10" Sabel Palm 3.0 F~ Q ~ ` a ~ 63 4" Hickory 3.0 54 10" Sabel Palm 3.0 ~ Q 14' SIR R=3.5 ^ 14° 41, 4.0 150 FCM 4"X4" . 6- ' 104. B9' 37" - " N FIR 1/1"6 14 # 2 I ~#59 51 1'60 40" ~ IE = 25. 1 " R " 1 ~ ~ ~ p M 64 14" Live Oak 3.0 66 11" Washington Palm 3.0 ' 1 X110 ~ ~ 2937 #17 # R=4.5 R=0.0 M N R=0. N 0.3' \ \ R=3.g=3.0 13' R=3.0 #61 I p # 0 25 24.4 R=O.D " 25.8 GRATE • ~ 'i ' R=3. p ~ 69 10" Norfolk Pine 3.5 67 11" .Washington Palm 3.0 ~ O n' z ' " 71 10" Live Oak 3.0 68 11" Washington Palm 3.0 ~ r" \ R= .5 14" I~9 146 Z6.0 GE _ \ 6,4 ~8 1153 ^R=3.5 R=3.D N IE k1_11 72 28" Live Oak 3.5 78 10" Washington Palm 3.0 \ \ R=3.0 13 R „ ~5.9 E IE _ ~ 6 #4B ~24° .5 x 12 ~ R ~ n 73 40" Live Oak 4.0 103 10" Sabel Palm 3.0 \ \ I R=3.5 " 169 4" W IE `o~( 28.1 R=3.5 #7D ~ ' ~ ~ 7 23.7 = ~ ; 74 50" Live Oak 3.5 107. 12" Sabel Palm 3.5 " 0'55 75 6" S1ashl'ine 3.0 108 14" SabalPalm 3.0 J I 9" N 28.1 2.5 / ' / 13 q m 2.1 12' 8.1 M ~ ~ 76 6" Slash Pine 3.0 109 11" Sabel Palm 3.5 / IA PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSNI ~ R=3,0 OP 1 2" n X ss 1 / # + 77 13" Crape Myrtle 5.0 110 13" Sabel Palm 3.5 H 81 8" Crape Myrtle 3.5 113 12" Sabel Palm 3.5 w / }1 6.8 S UTN, RANGE 15 EAST 1p` y~ - E 0,5' R=3.0 0.4' 82 8" Crape Myrtle 3.5 114 12" Sabel Palm 4.0 ® [-I I~ / ~ 23.5 ~ #45 ; ~ R=2,D REMOVE EXIST. M.H ° 'a n 86 42" Live Oak 4.5 115 13" Sabel Palm 3.5 ~ F..~ ~ / ~6 12• R P 1 88 25" Live Oak 3.0 .120 12" .Sabel Palm 3.0 ~ • 89 22" Live Oak 3.0 128 13" Sabel Palm 3.5 0 14" ° 23.5 6" R= .D #2 30' PR " ~ 1/° I R=2.0 1 12 " ~ p ~ ~ 90 24" Live Oak 3.0 129 11" Sabel Palm 3.5 ~--1 (L~ N1 iFR33.0 #3 .5 6.1 x R42.5 - ,D #120 ~ J t ~ R R=3.0 ie zs I I 91 15" Hickory 3.5 142 11" Washington Palm 3.0 ~ w w o,9' 92 15" Hickory 3.5 149 12" Sabel Palm 3.0 / ~ 7" O.R. BOOK 1231, PAGE 70 1a"6° 6 6• 14"1D° 13° 22" #7 ~ oNt- ~ ~ I 2D" 36 26.61 30.01 30.33 d ~ ° / ~ NITARY ANHO g7 94 Crape Myrtle 3.0 TOTALPALMSTOBEREMOVED=25 ~ ~ } 164 " O.y 125 #27 129 X30 12"24"14" 6,1 135 ~=PO #37 #3B -F 23,4 JD L1 3.5 R=1,5 ~ R=1.0 R=1. 31 / _ =2 =3.5 ~ 2" ~ R=3. 29.23 31.41 • ~ 31.38 > M EL = 1.78 ~ 7 15" IE = 26 48 ~ 98 9" Crape Myrtle 3S ~ ~J ~ - FCM 4"X " 3.2' V Fxc 7 A 610' ALLEY 3s B" 23° H 13 k ~3 ~ t0 lE = zs 47 j ~ 101 9" Crape Myrtle 3.0 w Q 7_9y" s 4 4 O.p~26 OK 59y~ PAGE 267 6, / R=2.D #40 #1 2 . ~ #2S~ +17.2 32.5 ~2$'9'd N .r ~ ~ 4 E 102 l0" Crape Myrtle 4.0 Q p L;.i R=2.5 ~ ~26" (DEAD) / ry IR 1 2 a 15" #26 ~ N/A 11" x F 4"X4" ~ 25.96 OHL m 1 d M ~ M~ ~ 121 5" H]ckOry 3.0 Z w Q ° ~ 124 l0" Crape Myrtle 3.0 U U Z n 124' R=2.0 ~ x 141 2/ r - j O N/A R=3 / R-D.0 # ~ SANITARY MANHOLE 2p" ' y~ 125 l0" Crape Myrtle 3.0 ~ ~ w fe A~t R=2,0 ~ a RIM EL = 26.33 C 22 43 ~27° N IE = 22.87 p ~ R-O.D I 142 ~18 W ~ ~ Q i0 ~ 126 5" Bald Cypress 3.0 O O w to a... 127 6" Bald Cypress 3.0 ~ a N R-0.0 R=3.0 13 J ° 20 S IE~22.89 # 44 X 15.6 R=2.5 „ p °~#141 SW I 23.05 R 3.0 Q ~ 131 7" Bald Cypress 3.0 C7 132 19" 'Live Oak 3.5 25" / ^ 3 ~ ~ W R=2.ON IE = 23.03 REMOVE EXISTING SAN. MH ~ 12 0 0,02 ~ _ LOT A CLOTS C. LU ~ 13 / 14 ~ . , 6"6"7"10°8 144 20" Live Oak 3.0 N N N N ~ SUBDiVI 0 ~ GROUT EXIST. VCP TO R=P5 #6 N5 R=2. b S7g 3 1146 '1 ~ P.B. 35, G. 76 DOWNSTREAM MH APPROX, R=~R-zp 13 R=LS 18`' 6=3 `'dl 75 +14.D LOCATION OF MH IS SHOW~NITARY MA L ~Cp 5' / 1145 0 2.03 31. ' 160 16" Hickory 3.0 Y Y Y Y 0] 32.DS ` TOTAL INCHES. 634" 8' POT E~ ~ ~ RIM EL = 25.8 m ~ R=3.0 PARCEL FOU ~ I #16 F T 6" t NE IE = 23.03 N Z ! R= .D ^ _ FO ~ 0.9' S #137. ~7~, . o ATER N A ~ NIA sw iE = z3sa sIR 1/2" ~ N,~9°4 :18 W D. ' 225.09 " R=1s / / 1 7 i122 n ORIGINAL 3 N ~ ~ ~R=2.5 8 SAN 0 121 #20 10" LOT 8 ~ NW IE = 23.39 ~ a 2 10'13" ~7•p 1 R=4.0 q ,3 10' FOP 1 1/ "#14D 1139 / 0p / R~ 35 #19 #18 I6" ~ii6 o w E 0.6' ~R-1.5 R=1.0 2.4' ~ S~ER~ I Qzwz y~~ ww~w „ ~ R=1. #e ~ A PORTION LOTS 2 & 3D. ~ xR=2.D R=2.5 SAW CUT & o ,0' w BLOCK 2 28.1 J ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ < „I~, NOV 2 3 2005 ~ ~ O M ~ ~ OOUO S D 19", J 1 1 19 a 31.16 9 ASPHALTEXIST jn!• a JONES SUBDIVISION OF H #15 R12.5 10" 21' 14" , o I ~ R Dg 9'S '22° 67.0 ~ #12 #11 #10 e.6^ 1 STORY . ~ NICHOLSON S ADDITION TO ~ Ia' Ih PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ ~ J ~ Z a 5' L5 1, STRUCTURE / N ~ CLEARWATER HARBOR P.B. 1 3DS 3t21 SND 25.55 Fcr,1=d•O,(4" FINISHED FLOOR .s' • PG.13 HILLSBOROUGH COUd~• Y ~ E; CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ o @i ? vCP N = 2 .1 J ~ ~ R 2.0 o SANITARY MANHOLE ' ~ N ~ 19 `a ~aaa v w ~ w N RIM EL = 25,78: ~ ~ o J1.21 o~~~ o W ~ N IE - 22.98 r Cp N O N 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ s IE = 22.s7 " wo D I PINES ~ 0 2 ~ w W k W IE = 24,02 SH D 1.9' N o ~ Gi 25.43 25.7 . o f 2 Q= 6 0/ 7"7"7°4° 30.6 31.21 ~ HARDWOODS DRIP LINE N SPECIFICATIONS - W000 BORRIER rn~o (n ~ n ~ a ' DRIP LME - _ 1. MINDAUM RADIUS i0 BE PROIECIEO: oMM n Mn' ~ A HARDWOODS - 2/3 DPoFUNE In V7 Ln !n W TREE REMOVAL LIST 312.404 No Osceola Av~ue PALM REMOV WST 312-004 N ° N ceola v I IN PLS 13138 1141 269 ( 1 A enae PALM REMOVAL LIST (312-404 Nam ~~U1~41~ ~ R-D.5 } ~ B. COMFERS & 5~8AL PN1A5 - EMIRE DPoPI.INE O O O p I 2° CL GAS TJ N O N p Q ~ w a I 3.1 TreeNomber Size T e Ra Tree Number " Size T Ratio Tree 29.2 30.5 12 - ~ ~ a _ _g Number Size ~ Ratin¢ 12° MAIN a 2 UPPoGHTS - NO LESS THAN 2' X 2' LUMBER a 3. HORIZOMALS - NO LESS THAN 1' X 4' LUMBER. d' (0 O ~ ~ 1160 REMOVE EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTRO 3'3"5°6" 2 12" PadocaTpus 3.0 8 6' Canary Palm 3.0 89 30' SabalPabn 5.5 25.36 X3.0 SIGNS THAT ARE NO LONGER 81325 3D.5 000•- 4. BARRERS SHALL BE ERECTED ARWND AU. 'r REQUIRED DUE TO RELOCATION: OF 22 29.4 , 3 9" Live Oak 3,0 9 12' Sabal Palm 3.0 90 30' Sabal Palm 2" CI CIS R / ~ PROTECTED TREES AND PALMS, AND INSPECTW 6Y a Cffr REPRESENTATNE BE1'OItE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. ~ N ~ ¢ Z 6 10" Laurel0ak 3.0 10 13' SabalPabn 3.5 91 20' SabalPalm 4. As~r~`)N 25. A PORTION OF OSCEOLA AVENUE (YP.) 14" Ri 5 ~ 5. UPRIGHT POST5 ARE TO ~ AT LEAST 4 FEE! IN LENGDI (n ~ ~ WITH A MIMMIM ~ 1 FOOT ANCHORED IN CROUMI AND 3 - 11 39" Live Oak 3.5 20 16 Sabal P 4.5 93 12' Sabal Palm 3.5 ~ 4 ' IB" 3Ds #1 B, > #159 LOT 1 15° #148 LOT 2 29. 1 19 28 Live Oak 3.0 27 10' Sabal P 3.0 94 10' Sabal Palm 3.5 L ~3.o BLOCK 2 #155 14" O R=tD BLOCK 2 4 .5 S DRM MANHOLE c I FEET ABGUE GROUND. K W>- U1 - O Z W 2,8' e, BARRIERS fi REMNN M PLACE UNDL ALL PAYING. . 2 ~ I .,A w " ~ ~ a . IM EL = 26.16 8" R=2.0 #156 -.y~ 26 28 Live Oak 3.0 30 26 SabalPalm 3.0 95 Il 5abalPalm 3.0 l R=L5 ^e Z^^~ 1~ .31.6 I ~ ~ CONSTRUCRON M!D HEAVY EOUIPMEM IS OUT Of ARFA ~ 28 20" Red Bev 3.5 ~6 70' (lneenPalm 40 101 71' S~1~n1P~lm 5n CATCH BAST , ~ ~ N IE = 19.34 ~54 nQ JONES SUBDIVISION OF p 29 12" Laurel Oak 3.0 39 10' SabalPabn 3.0 104 18' SabalPalm S.ORM EL = 25'4 N N ts . E IE = 11.46 (66" RCP) 24" 11-- 11 NICHOLSGN'S ADDITION TO 30 7.i 27.6 - - 71>- 27.7 - - - R=3.5 R=35 2 ,5 RESOURCE SPECLWST AT 562-4741. 4 x° e Z S IE = 19.4 } '4' E IE = 9.88 (42" RCP) #157 14" CLEARWATER HARBOR P.B. 1 J 21.4 IE 27.69 33 27Hickory 4.5 44 25 Queen Palm 4.0 105 21 Sabal Palm 4.5 o W IE = 8.52 OR=2.0 #153 0 T 29 30.7 127.69 --F- _ co ~cy_ y 28 4 FURTHER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE LAND 6' 8' w 31.6 1C) 1 w 40 12" Laurel Oak 3.0 R=25 12" PG.13 HILLSBOROUGH -000N' .4 .21 8.9 46 12 Sabal Palm 3.5 106 20 Sabal Palm 4.5 - 5 a133 27.2 48 27" Live Oak 4.0 47 20' Sabal Palm 3.5 108 18' Sabal Palm 3.5 " 15" #149 r 14„ I 1 0 30.8 Y72 - 25.23 51 14" Live Oak 3.0 52 20' Saba1 Palm 5.0 110 15' Sa 3. 5.31 AV #151 #152 R-3.D #I50 ~1.D8 #132 ~'0 2 . -.1 #131 3"4"6" #127 (n 2/3 OF RIP LINE v p R=3,01 I ENTIRE DRIP LINE w R-3.0 130 28.2 X 1 # 2431.3 0 0 , UPRIGHT „ ANHOLE +0s" _ R=2.5 R=3.0 § R=30.2 #126 2815 R 3 71 uPwcM 2E ~~il cam` ; 74 29 Live Oak 3.5 53 11' Sabal Palm 3.0 ill 15' Sa 4.0 oy< 258 $5.54 R-2.0 29.3 1. 30.00 9.0 - 25.03 WM c• 2 ~ FCM 3" 29.2 .0.79#1 OHL 87 8" Hickory 3.5 68 ~11' Sabal Palm 3.0 112 9- g FaFm- = 18.7 4. 51 - OHL 25.71 25. OHL + .81 1 S 9° W 100.00 R=3 o 31. + tM M¢oNral HORIZONTAL ~w c 97 11 Hickory 4.5 69 24' Sabal Palm 4.0 113 17 Sabal = 1 B9-80 .60 45 E 3015 21.66 N R RLY @ LINE SIR S89°59 „ :(UNDER 102 23 Laurel Oak 3.5 71 23 Sabal Palm 5.0 114 20 Sabal Imlip . 6.79 •5 24. '01 E 66" RCP R WM S89°59' 50.00 30.52 12=3.'o - 9 I z 3 ~Q ' 129 25" Live Oak 3.5 24. 91 ONES TREET CONFLICT eQx w/ S89°59'22"W 50.00' 30.18 66" RCP 5 30.8u Q J z 3018 MANHOLE 30.62 (D > m 72 22 SabalPalm 5.0 115 16 SabalPalm 4, CULVE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SANITARY MANHOLE TOTALINCHES 334 p 75 10 Date Palm Cluster 5.0 116 20 SabalPalm 5.0 z g3~gM MANHOLE CO SIRUCTION) RIM EL = 29.08 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE SANITARY MANHOLE RIM EL - 30.23 cf) 78 10' Date Palm Cluster 4.5 117 20' SabalPalm ~:0~ E }f$&WL = 26.34 RIM EL = 30.5530• FL1E = 23.30 +26.44 +28.62 S IE = 24.13 AND REMOVE ALL PAR POLES FILLED W DIRT + RIM EL = 30.55 30.52 E IE = 11.94 3110 FILLED W/ DIRT + d~ . W IE = 11.88 +30.87 313~0F H0 79 20' Sabal. Palm 4S 118 19' abal Palm 5 +25.69 _ W IE = 24.05 +29.23 ON SITE / S 4. 2g• SW IE - 23.27 RECLAIMED WATER a Vcp METER INSIDE 80 12 Sabal Palm 3.0 119 20 Sabal Palm 4.5 TARYY MANHDLE - RECLAIMED WATER y METER INSIDE 888VVCP_ 13107 tom,; , 81 32' Sabal Patin 5.0 124 18' Sabal Palm 3.5 M EL = 25.46 026.18 28.76 - - +30.99 TREE BARRICADES 3R.~5 - 1 1ERT PE N.T.S. DRAWN BY: RJM 82 20' Sabal Palm 4.0 IE ° 2Hi 9 3&99~ NSERT D INTO SANITARY MANHOLE 2" CI(3 79) - I Gy 83 20' Sabal Palm 5.0 TOTAL PALMS TO BE REMOVED =46 25.61 -22-s6- + . - - WATER 5'.57. 2" PVC 29.66 30.14 30.26 S CHECK BY: KEZ mig-EL 3T-42 1.26 CLEARW TER NE IE = 27.04 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ''SUFI ~G 97fi2 30.17 30.40 30.93 E Q 27.64 c 02$3 C~OtLEARWAT FR-Ml I E IE = 26.92 MAIN 31 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 5 IE = 27.09 ENGINEERING ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 ,r'ry CATCH BASIN c• -RIM EL = 25.68 GAS MAIN 6 30.64 ouM n oa F IE = 23.31 = 23.38 J " ; TREE eaRRRlcaoES 04ro9703 SHEET 't3 00 LANDSCAPE STANDARD - f tY: f E 3 of 9 I I j i i i ~ ~A i ~ j ~J u~ ~ p ~ °L- ~ ^ ~ GENERAL NOTES: n ~ I ~ ~ I z ~ 1. ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. EMERGENCY STABILIZED ACCESS ROADWAYr s ~ nor z I rar ~ w W ~ I 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 W/ GEO-WEB CELLULAR CONFINEMENT SYSTEM 1 > c ~ ~ I ~ 1 ' ! SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 ~ r` W/ REQUIRED BASE TO MEET H-20 LOADING + ~ a ,I 2 20'x20' SIGHT `'C I, o ; ~ ! i i (727 793-9888 Bus I, ~ 23'xS' TfltL-`"y - ~Y-~-% ~ N~~ `~i i (727 793-9855 Fax LEGEND O ~ 2 VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (TYP.) 14' VERTI A f~ ~ (1) H.C. SIGN ~ ~ 1 ~ ° ° ~ ~ i~ ~ 2. SITE ADDRESS: CLEARAN E E~,OW W I 1 (2) 12' WIDE EMERGENCY LOAD G C-~ SI IN ZONE W/ PORT CO'HE E MATS EXISTING PA1~1; II) ~ SPECIAL MARKING CROSS ALK I, ~ MAR N i ~ PARCEL 1: 09-29-14310-000-0080 PARCEL 9: 09-29-15-44352-002-0010 TYP. TYPICAL ` VEHICLE AccESS GATES ~ ~I PI `1 (2)."NO PARKING/LOADING (TYP,) , PER FDOT INDEX X17346 T I ; I 404 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS ~ I H.C. It MPS W/ TRUNC TE ! ' ZO 5 G S ~ ~ NE I N , PROJECT BOUNDARY ~ cnu~r>Ir! GoRrlt~ 2 Rl- " r' SIGN" DOMES PER FD INDEX X304 & 5 ~ ; CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA O ~ I 1 r___--- i~~o--o-"-=-o-:- ~-._-r~ - _ 2 24" ST Pt~BAR fi1~ ' ~ `I -1"STO & CITY OF C~L ARWACTER CONTRAC ! }s ! I i PARCEL 2: 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 PARCEL 10: 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 ~ OVERHANG/FLOOR ABOVE - _____r-;____,. . _ - S-G,~- - _c, /I _ _ _ - - ,~»,~.~~~,u„ 150.04' _ / ~i 4~1'~4„ty IF~PRiIONS (TYP.) ~ ~ I I' r?~ 5~' °~-i~R4?1 5"TOP`SIGN" ~ ~ ~ i I 400 N, OSCEOLA AVENUE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS ~ i~ ~ ~ I ( ~ ' 'I CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ 14' ~h) „ 4Af„ ~ EXISTING TREE CANOPY TO REMAIN ~ ~C3 _ _LU _ f, s.~ 5-~ A ~ i ~ PARCEL 3: 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 PARCEL 11: 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 ~ U 14„ ~R=S.o r a ¢ G R 5T!I~EiRG.~, SiRE~~T. PAVEMENT I ! I 314 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS k~ o o I GEORGIA STREE ¢ EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED .R~ 0 4° 1J° r, ~ ~ ~ ~~yy w/ s" sTRaICHT , ~ . ~ ~ ( CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ Q' m., BUILDING FOOTPRINT 12» XR=95 $05 ~ m --js ~ ~ 20'x20' SIGHT CURB (TYP.) I I I I i ~I VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (TYP, ~I I, ;-w ! G PARCEL 4: 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 PARCEL 12: 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 1 114 ~ 13 R=4.5~ iC' 13° O ~ 14° ~ i'I ',r~ ~ i NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS 309 OSCEOLA AVENUE l~ Q ~115 R=3.5 =a.. 112 1?° pi0d ~'t0e ~ 9 RCHITECTURAL PAVERS R=4.5 ~ R=a.J ~1oe ~'P=4,5 SkR=~S ~ ~ I j ~ j CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA R 3 ~ ~1" ® r~ -0 it " M o ~ ~ I ~ I I~ PARCEL 5: 09-29-15-00000-430-0500. PARCEL 13: 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 ~ ~ I l ~ ~ i~ Ir... 312 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE 410 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE u~ Z --r --~r -arc, r 15° 36 11° ~3d ~ n 51 ® .k 5 ~ L r`a.. N ~ ~z~, . X116 1~ -2,O,~i R°>.b 5 ,~T`,m ~ N • : V~ ~'e. 1 , I ~ =a5 ~a w 12 ~~~g ~ ~ ~ ro I ! ~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ i, 4 R=5.0 ~ 16 a95 ~ r. ' ING RFA ~ Ej' 6 r~. 242 y ~ ~ ~i PARCEL 6: 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 ~ j j'~ NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS R~ z~ C ~ ~it7 11 to 4.0 ~ N Q ~ R=5.0 ~19I - W .18 16 STEP RISERS x- l ' f R 4.5 e~ ..1 .h J 1. 9 s.ss' ' ~P CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ ~ 9 -STEP RISERS HARRISGN ~ Q Z ~ 13 (L' ~ ~ _ 16.33' _ ~i~, ~'t ; R3 X38=~. o, ~a. ~ 1o'x~o carlc-_ _ s' I i PARCEL 7: 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 _ ~ ` VILLAGE r-- ~ CC 8 _ ~ I I I~ti II NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS W, a rr In - . pi _ 7RkNSF~RMER PAD'- ~ 1 °d;o52.sa sF ~ ~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA N W; ~ ? ~ ~ _ - Q O _ ~ e FFE = 32.5 I I ~ ~ m Y $ - i ~I j II ~ PARCEL 8: 09-29-15-07940-000-0021 Z ~ ~ ~ j d~ ~ i6" - RECYCLING & SQLID WANE ao 12' + } ~ ifi" " I (h ; X124 ~ STAGING=AREA ~ ?~1~n " 50"~ r _ + a,sr I I i 300 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE ~ l7 N SOllD WASTE-CUMPAI,TOR 467 ~ ~ = R ° o ~.8' I--- ~ A~~I~G~~•SCALE ~ Io q o ;z ~ ' ~8, ® srus~GE AND ST¢Gw~ ,aREA I ~ I I I ~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ z ~ (SEE ARGHITEC,TURBL PLANS FOR ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ 1 a~ ~ roc ;>r INTERIOR CONFIGURA110N} j I ~ i I ~ ZONING: "D" ~ J; ~ ~ 2 I I ) r s 30 0 15 30 60 1 f 10^ ~X ~'C X ~ , ~ " ~ ~ i I~ 3. PRESENT USE ATTACHED DWELLINGS /RETAIL SALES & SERVICE ~ U _ ` ~ r J' 82 i6 ~ X I ~ ~ VIII I R=4.0 X81 ~ 9 1 11° ~ R-5' X R 'r / i» 1 f f E = 20.33 ° ~ 'I~ 4. DEVELOPED USE RETAIL /OFFICE /ATTACHED DWELLINGS MIXED USE I ~I 1 ~ IN FEET) ! ~ ~~9.r 6` _ f~ ~ ~ R=4.5~ / F 0.5 # .0' ,X , Ra Ra I ` ;T ~'n~ 5. TOTAL SITE AREA HARRISON VILLAGE 52,947.90 SF (1.21 AC) ~ 1 inch - 30 CLUSTER ~,BO ~ X ~ TELEN$lON/CAELE i I©' 1o j~ ISLAND VIEW 158,605.87 SF (3.64 AC) Z, l(J ~ ~7d l R=3.~ ~ i( X' X X: X BOX LOCATIONS , o 3 ~ R=4.5 / + R$, R I i ~ TOTAL 211,553.77 SF 4.85 AC Z O~ ` HARRISGN / ~ .C C X _ X 4 ctn';x~roR ~ , , 7 li ~ $ ® ® I ~ I I+ PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 26,393.90 SF (0.60 AC) W ~ ~ ~ 'i VILLAGE - -7 ~ X X X Roots i 12.5 20 1g" R :C IJ I ! ~ :C eg s .a DIRECrioNAt TURN ARROWS ~ i 1 'I~ PROPOSED REQUIRED ~ U Q'i CrJ 'i9 ~ E'-is' sFACINC IPER ~ 6. SETBACKS: P-~ I 4,077.31 SF ` d ~ ~ ~ f 91 R- 0 f FFE = 32.5 q7 X R- " rwr u.tc D. 64ARKINC oErAlES)~~- ~I I ~ ~ ISLANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS 22.64' MIN. (NORTH BUILDING) 0.00' MIN. (NORTH BUILDING) O ~ ~ ~ , If I P,=i.O ~ ~ ia" ! ; ! Q 1 I ~ 2G'x?0' SIGH7 V1~IBILIT'( „~s r , II o ~ ~ ~ ~ . , .gas iN" (r~rP } I ~r,~ .'I 7 ' 0 ENT) 0.00' MIN. (NORTH BUILDING) ~ ~ (s,l ;ias ! I t ja 31.36' MIN (WEST BUILDING ~ 0.00' MIN (WEST BUILDING) ~ ^ a TRIANGLES (tiP) R=~9 , I j ~ , 1 j ` ~ ~ ~ , / Re. ,l ~ I / _ . s° sTPalcf~r cuRa I ~l , 3 . G) O.OD' MIN. (SOUTH BUILDING) W ~ H ~ I ~ ® (T'fP~) ~ i r~ j~ Ali 3,30; MIN, (SOUTH B,O.C.) O.OD' MIN. (SOUTH PAVEMENT) Q Z ~ W i.,' 9,00 MIN. (EAST BUILDING) O.OD' MIN. (EAST BUILDING) ~ O / ~ t I Ii ~~»5 X g o lit, j?~ i ~ 0.00' MIN. (EAST B.O.C.) O.OD' MIN. (EAST SIDEWALK) W (la di r ~ , ° I I il. ~ HARRISON ! I I~ ,M,~ Ili HARRISON VILLAGE 16.68; MIN. (NORTH BUILDING) O.OD' MIN. (NORTH BUILDING) ~ O Z ~ - i,. j .l VILLAGE I I ; I , & GARAGE 0.00 MIN. (NORTH PAVEMENT) O.OD MIN. (NORTH PAVEMENT) ~ ~ ---r ~ ~ _ _ - I t3' STORMWATER C~ r ~ - : ~12e POND ISLAND ViEW ~ i ~ , ,~~AND I 50' r' RETAIL $ UNITS ~ f ! ! 19.06' MRJ. (SOUTH BUILDING) 0.00' MIN, (SOUTH BUILDING) ,o r~ 8,552 s~ SF ; y 0.00' MIN. (SOUTH PAVEMENT) 0.00' MIN. (SOUTH PAVEMENT) ~ ~ a nZ5 R=2.5 PARKING GARAGE R_Q_ / \ ~ r. BUFFER ~ & ATTACHED U<;IITS o- , FFE = 32.5 ; 4.6T MIN. (EAST BUILDING) 0.00' MIN, (EAST BUILDING) <.5U i / 0126 ) C ~ 6691B:63SF R= ~ ry ~ ` ~ ~ s I ~ I ~ ` 0.00' MIN. (EAST PAVEMENT) O.DO' MIN, (EAST PAVEMENT) r JONES STREET ~ ~ FFE -'31.00 13.17 ~ I 8' TYP. I ~ i it j ` ® ® h ~ i p 4.6T MIN. (WEST BUILDING) 0.00 MIN, (EAST BUILDING) ~ ~ ~ ; ~ i ~ 0.00 MIN. (EAST PAVEMENT) O.DO MIN, (EAST PAVEMENT) R= , ? ~"h , ( ~ I . POOL DECK ; ~6 ~~^h I I ~ ~ , ; ? o t~5 ~ X I~ ~ I ~ Q Ij + s' ~ ` = 1 . 7. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 30'-50' FT. I J_ i i, ~ ~ ~ 5 it DESIGN BY OTF~RS - ~ ~ + X25 • ~.01C c,a X X M .c » i , X C r ~ ! r'\ N ~ I, o PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT 40'-D" FT. (HARRISON VILLAGE & ISLAND VIEW VILLAS) j ~~I = (FROM BFE TO PARAPET) I , 11° 20 / ~ 5' WIDE ARC-HITECT"RAL 14" ~ ~ ~ !r ,.5»6" ,4 R=x° ! rNJ! EIDEWNLH R B iNG - ~g7 6 ,T I ~ ~ 't9" i 1 (SEE ARCNIIECTUP,AL P ANS - r~ s~ f ~ ~ I ~ 150'-8" FT. (ISLAND VIEW TOWER) H. I R-z , R 3., X19 FOR DET ILS) ~97 Q ® '8 a ~ j z I I~ (FROM BFE TO ROOF DECK) R=3.0 ~ 1 » R=3., (;1 r 3 / o \ ~ o FouNTnIN jPU6L(c aRr R ~I I, 8. SOLIDWASTE WILL BE PROVIDED WITH TWO DOUBLE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, TWO COMPACTORS, ~ H H22 ~ oo PiHITE A LocAr~oN (sEE ARAN I ~ ! ; ( AND ROLL-OUT DUMPSTERS. ~ ,y PLANS FOR DETAILS) I-- j Nt w ~,5» R=5.0 ~ ~ ~ 15" il" i5" ~2 2~"?8° PAI r . r ,o-t" ~N o ~i'7 :~e 5? nf- Ala ~ • 13.33' ~ ~jr;, r. r9. EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS TO BE REMOVED = 33,236.76 SF (0.15 FAR) ~ 0 o• • ~ _ i ~S8 X56 ~ 5"6^d' R-` 0 ~ R=3.5 - jg~ ~Y '~G' (L) ~ /R=3.5 = ,n rs R~ - R-3.$T0~9k,1MAT1Rl.5 gn3 X98+ ~ ~ 3+ I ! - - r R C.~ , it ORD R=3. X f.' STRA HT CURB R=~ i~ _ . ~ ;14" R-3.5 r~iF~., n ~ ~~,p. CITI 1NDEX # 10-E» t`~Ti _ nS^~ JC ~ ~ ~ j 10. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED OR PLANTED; A R-O-W USE x ;n , ,q„ 1. v ,.0 ~.i, 462 , X59 \ ~ ~1' $5t R=0.0 ~ ~T^ ~ I f~ ~ I ~ I PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPING AND ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN R-O-W ~ n R-0. CU \ 0 R=3.~=30 13" ,5» obi 9" I \ 1, _.5 14 X43 xk5 R=OA p ~ g ICI ~ a e=" ,T 0 I ~ ~ i i E 11. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB Z W , , ~ \ \ 0 ~ ' \ y, SIDEWALK, AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. ® ~ w r~ \ ~ ? ~u . d !I ~ C ' ' G:NEClTOR ~I 12. FLOOD ZONE: C~ ~ E-I w ~ti~ 1 - / :a'~~?u' coNC. ~ ~ I ~ ~ TH15 PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "VE (14 & 15), AE (12), & X (OUT SIDE ~ ~ • -rRnrasEaRh+ER 4 I I j I THE 500 YR. FLOOD PLAIN" AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE ! " TELEVISIOP~]/CARL 9 ~ o ~ S / X iC BOX LOCA110N ~ ,°n PAS (TIP.) ~ ~ ~ I ( MAP N0. 12103C0106G. " ® ) HARRISON ® ~ I I 13. A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED ~ w 4' SIDEWALK W ~ / 7~ CONTRACTOR SHALL ARCHITECTURAL PAVERS ~ _ ^ri f'-' R ~ , I VILLAGE bl I RECONSTRUCT EXISTING ~ / !~FE 20.33 X ~ a $ RETAINING WALL (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS X ~ UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION. Z I~ RETAIL & UNITS ~ I ~ 1 O FOR DETAILS c° \ ) ~3 ~3 X W 171 R=3.0 ~ d . ~ ~ 9,552.61 SF 1 w ~ w I 114. THERE ARE NO ENVIROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE LANDWARD OF SEAWALL & WETLAND LINE J X ..0 Z i. / w 1Z~ iL"S" 5' 6» Z FFE = 32.5 j I I Q ~ w w I ~ 15. SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT TO OR A PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE z J Q j Q~' ~5 k?7 / p29 ~0 L'_~ h' Q X ' ~ DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED CONSISTENT WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS ~ ~ z - X g c g c © ~ sAw cuT ~ MarcN ~ 1 I ' j I ~r' AND STANDARDS INDEX #109, INCLUDING THE AA.A (TRUNCATED DOMES PER D.O.T. INDEX #304) w w ~ p EXISTING PAVEMENT- ~La I ! ~ i ! ~ ~ w s3a.3o' ' n" X X R w ~ - i ~ 4" ~2d? 3:' X X ~ 10' o coNC- _ z v ~ Rio (T'rP-) r I ~I I ~ i I~ 16. ARKING REQUI E ~ ~ z r i-, 8~,; ~ R=1.5 ='l.U ~ 1RANSFORMER PAD (TYP.) ~ ~ &?.41'(L1 R=_ 5 ~2g' CEAC X G 8' $ 0 ~ WHITE ~ ® j 1, I j ~ ~I .ATTACHED DWELLINGS UNITS (324 UNITS)x(1.5 SPACES PER UNIT)=486 SPACES a a ~ j~ PIAYGROUNd~4 ~ C. i `ti lOG171oN R=9 R-~,0 M? RECYCLRJG SOLID WASTE , N 2 , N _THERIaoPEnsTIC I ! I I i 1 RETAIL (26,124 SF)x(4 PER 1,000 GFA) =104 SPACES TRnFFIC PAlrlr s° wNlr~ I v %'i • ~~,,2 R=20 STACIfJG AREA 20" =2.5 cC ° ~ 2' I," , ~ "ti YYQQQQ 0] (rm_) THERMOP~nsTlc , I ~ I j r-7a TOTAL = 590 SPACES ixua,~IC Pai~T- i ~ ~ I ~ I p, SITE DATA TABLE: EXISTING: P E : REQUIRED; ~ ~ w i 3S• /0~ R=O.G R=3.0 ~3 ~0 ~ 'ti ~ H!. <7 R8, 1I X - " ® i ' ! I ( I' A. TOTAL SITE AREA; 211,553.77 SF (4.85 AC) 211,553.77 SF (4.85 AC) N/A ~ ucHT Fo~E I RIGHT-OF-WAY 20,770.93 SF (0.47 AC 26,393.90 SF (O.6D AC) N/A ~ r7 ~ rn ~5 ~ 13" ~ 1y , 4 , » aj P=20 iq • r. /~R / ~ 71 ~~6, ,i08 I~ a p=R.~ R=?, w in unwasrf i \ _ r R=2.nR_20 ~0 O GINGAR " ~ 0 14., ~ I~,- ';B:- TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 110,364.63 SF (2.53 AC 54,131.78 SF (1.4 AC) N/A 3 ~ z z ~ ~ '~~I ,Nt- I ~wwwzz I ~;~C, BUILDING FOOTPRINTS 33,236.76 SF (0,15 FA 94,145.92 SF N/A w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ~ I I ~I i RETAII AREA: - 26,124.00 SF (0.12 FAR) - ~ o °v ° o o ~ ~ . _ H RETAINING ~ - - - - - - - - - - » ' ~ "r;;',~~~:r R~ 1 I" it U UU ~d'. rijA~ ~ QL W/ALUMIN. °o, ~ ~ Q ~2p+20 10" ro R=4A ~ I ! ~ _Y 1,)"(~; X140 4139 i ~ + z l0"13" RAIL TOP ~ ~ R-,5 6' HIGH SCREEN FENCE ~ ::~i / R=3." ,,i~ IB l/~6 ~ ' ~ ~ tits 10 ~ ~ - u°, X ~ ' r ~ 1( ~ E. SIDEWALK/DECK/PAVED AREA: 67,952.38 SF 53,276.07 SF N/A o ~ w w ~ ~ z ± s~xlD wnsTt col~PACroR I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 630.00' / ;,~:,1,j ~ - °^w - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~d i I ,y ri M ~ (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ~ . I I F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA; 101,189.14 SF (0.47 ISR 147,421.99 SF (0.69 ISR) N/A } ~ ~ ~ TORAGE AND STAGING AREA ~ ~ - ~ ~i_ - - ~ - - ~ R-^.E I 5~ J i F FOR DETAILS ~ a - ~ ~ ~ j , i ~ ~ ) (TYP.) (sEE ARCHIrECruRn~ PEAKS Fa I r; I I G. PARKING SPACES: ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ w w ~ I, ~ I awwaa ~ INTERIOR coI~IPIC~IHnTIOr17 ~ I i a ISLANDVIEW i~ HARRISON AUTOMAiIO PARKING - 637 (324 UNITS)z o a a ~ p s ~i3 ! ( IO 12 WIDE EMERGEt`,ICY~ ~ ~ 10` ,r' ~ e~ SPECIAL MARKING CROSSWALK I ~ 5 ~.-2.,, _ _ _ lay, - ~ , ~ ~ICLE ACCESS GA S 1 i O.i{'` i s v~oE ARCNIrECruRn~ I ~ j i (1.5~ SPACES PER UNIT) w > > w w w ~ ~ N ~ ' ~ ;r"4 t ~ 1 m•- 7711 P'0 ~~i. ~ `,~~s' ~ I ~ - - ~ Imo, PER FDOT INDEX X17346 (TYP.) M „ 5~ _ ~4 ia,.(,r F..x.. lj ~ ~ ,,r.rrlR N G.~ ~ ga ® a~NCSO~wtiLH ~ ~ I I I I HARRISON MLIAGE OfFSIiE IMPROVEMENTS - 42 (OFF-SITE) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° P=10a a r,' - - s a .Tr''--,, j (FORT HARRISON & OSCEOLA) + (26,124 SF) sANDINC isEE - ~ I L~! 52 SPACES TOTAL 679 SPACES TOTAL OFFICE RETAIL t ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ' / , _ EMERGENCY STABILIZED ACCE . ROADWAY ! I { (4) G 'SE 2 STREET TERhiiNATION ~ I w W GEO-WEB CELLULAR CONFlNEMENT SYSTEM j { ' SIGN I~ER FDOT INDEX 17349 i ~ R ~ FoR DErAI~s) ~ I 590 SPACES TOTAL ~ N N ~ ~ ~ R8 ~ ~ H. RESIDENTIAL UNITS 4 39 (HARRISON VILLAGE) (4.85 AC)X N o a N Q 5 (TYP.) S" w ~ ~ I W/ REQUIRED BASE TO MEET H-20 LOADING Cs. I I ~ I j~ 8' , ' ~ ~ ~ ~ UFT STATION LOCATION I ~ SAW CUT, IREMOVE, & j s4i=G ~ 5 0 o ~ V m ~ i I i MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ~ ---j o I ? 285 (ISLAND VILLAGE) (50 UNITS/ACRE) ~ ~ of o ~ r o 5 z ~i e 2 RETAINING WALL IMTH RAILING -----I L =°=r - ± + ~ ~ I 6 UNITS TOTAL ~ 324 UNITS TOTAL OFFICE/RETAIL o 0 0 = ~I~I I w o~ ~ (SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR i ~ ! ~ °ia~ n ~ y N w DETAILS a=65 I a 1-; ~ 242 UNITS TOTAL ~ N r7 ~ ~ co 0 _ ) i I a , I ~ VALLEY GUTTER PER 0 30 ~ I ) i ;I j18. GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, UTILITY BOXES, AND OTHER MISC. SITE FIXTURES WILL BE PAINTED, ~w>-~-oz~n ~ ! j ~ rn 3"i'5'6"FDOT INDEX 300 0 ® n.s7 s7' ~ ~I ! ~ SCREENED, OR OTHERWISE CONCEALED, OR BLENDED IN BUILDING ARCHITECTURE " I ~ ! j R'r"°:0 ~i36 4 (TYP.) 1,19. PEDISTRIAN SIDEWALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER'S w ..~s,:~: A -~-Y i I TYP c' ~rvo ~ 6~ STRAIGHT CURB I I 1 I e'I I 13, 14' F 2,V ~HARRISON (T (P.) 1i KtUUIKtMtNIt- ANU 51ANUAKUS. #148 1,ti Ii`8 =1,^ VILLAGE 4 'I20. OPEN SPACE/RECREATION IMPACT FEES ARE DUE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 1,0 4.071.31 SF 0 /5\ FFE=32.5 P.ss' ~I ! I OF FINAL PLAT WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. g,5~v 2.18 i . 24 o + tdh~ 2.18 o ~I21. EXISTING SITE AREA: 211.553.77 SF (4.85 ACIACI I \ ! glSl' 1+" 7;71 ; W \ 3'12 EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY: 20.770.93 SF (0.47 AC) m~ a / , F=2.. I» #14-j - G _ 2 W14-1 "DEAD END" r"' J=',;~' 14' PROPOSED SITE AREA: 211.553.77 SF (4.85 AC) ~z} 1 I I - A6 o ro° I ~l P OP S D I 0 Y 6 9 .9 0. 0 C s m n p--2•0 R-25 it rn I i i o0 ~r -R,,QOPEN SPACE/RECREATION IMPACT FEES ARE DUE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR ~q o Y ~s FINAL PLAT WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. CONTACT ART KADER AT 727.562.4824 TO CALCULATE - ASSESSMENT. W. SAW CUT & MATCH 21. PARKING GARAGE MUST ALLOW AN 8'-2" H.C. VAN ORIGINAL, DRAWN BY: RJM JONES STREET EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURB, o I IDEWALK, & GRADES (TYP,) o °o 1~(2) 20'x2O' SIGHT VISIBILITY (1) 20'x20' INTERSECTION H.C. RAMPS W/ TRUNCATED RECEIVED IL S + a TRIANGLE (TYP) f VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (TYP.) I I DOMES PER FOOT INDEX #304 & 109, CHECK BY: KEZ LIGHT POLE & CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT <1 - - - - - - ' - - (1) Rt-1 "STOP SIGN„ - o (1)-24" STOP BAR- BANES-STREE-T 3NES-STREE-T MATCH TONES .STREET R0AD1 _ .LOCATION (TYP.) SPECIFICATIONS (TYP.) ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 40' RZW IMPROVEMENTS BY THE 61W I , NOV 231005 OF CLEARWATER ARCHITECTURAL PAVEMENT (2) SOLID YELLOW STRIPE OSPE A"ENUE r~_ VALLEY PER FDOT _ 50' RNV INDEX 3oO ( P r AL-(T . (SE~AKH. PLANS (2) 10'x30' SKIP LINE SHEET SPECIAL MARKING CROSSWALK _ FOR PER FOOT INDEX #17352 & M.U.T.C.D PLANNING DEPARTMENT MfyR ING DETAILS (TYP.) CITY OF CIEARWATER PER FDOTWIDEX #17346 (TYP.) TRUCK TURNING TEMPLATE CAR TURNING TEMPLATE ATCM EXISTING PAVEMENT Q MARKING OF 9 ii! ii 'it P 1 W 7 I ~ cn CONTACT C .CORE DRILL & CONNECT TO EXIST. `4 ~ o AND CONNE c"n~ CONTACT CLEARWA E ~ ' ~ ~ ~ .i~ ~ o AND CONNECT NEW PRIG , ' ; ~ ~ ~ "C ; ` , , ~ MANHOLE (S)INN-21.57 LOCATION ' LOCATION TO EXIST. GAS MAIN ~ ~ a 'ITA~Y a,rJrd4tE', 4 SAr~IT?~.?Y t~d1~.WHOLE ~ 6"x6" TAPF HARRISON VILLAGE WASTEWATER FLOWS 'i CONSTRUCT 2" BLOWOFF & VALVE 6"x6" TAPPING SLEE I ~ ° `"T ~ RI ~ E~ .yid & VALVE ~ ~ S ' Ea 2 25~ • ° GRAPHIC SCALE 5 C RUI `JRd • AT END OF 4" W.M. TO REMAIN Ribs EL = 2?.So U1 FLOW = (39 UNITS)(25O GAL/UNIT)=(26,124 SF OFFICE/RETAIL)(O.1 GAL DY) r~ IE = 2,,5~ o snwlc~~; 1 , raE. IE = 25.04 I + LAC SAWICC)~T~}'R€~e10VE, & ~ ~ a T ~ ~dAN L£ TGP . . FLOW = 12,362 GPD I SE IE = z2sa REP OiIL'UG4rd c, F,.rdER ~~V IE = 21.5? REPLAC~~X1fi G AL r- ° `a• E ~ I! 30 0 15 3D 60 ,E U.D N X p,~ E, ~ a PEAK FLOW ! - - " °4ss~R ~a + ; PF = (12,362 GAL/DAY) (DAY/1444 MIN)(4 PF) 1 - - - _ - - - _ W~,',q , . 'JVV 1 sVi 1~, °z'~ °4S&6°4~~0..,,;~~1.1r~.95~ (~F~1.~1~{~~92.'@~) a~'..~ : ik`' aI, Q ~ ~ J I < _ t~ (W FEET) , J - - GHS GAS CAS ~ PF = 35 GPM _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ s~. ~ r ~ ~ ~ ..R . - ~ ~aF 1 inch = 30 ft. I ITaRY r~alvl-Rr~~ r.~r;lyd a~~ ;P G RGIAS' ~ RGU~s~r~RGIA STREET ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ GEORGIASTREt`i~l EL = 2?.52 ,_,r 40' RN ,oo ( ? _ ~ ~ ,n o ~ E IE - 21.90 EX TING ~ ~ ~ I ` .a ~ .L ro I I 4" vCP 5 IE °.r2k9s"`.` FI h S I ----(srw'IE = 23.11 HY RANT GAS JAJ ]o, ~ . ~ U a ~ . LEGEND e• ~ , ~ 'J - 8• ~ . ~o I NG'1 ~ ~ I Fl NYD NT I- ~ ~,I~ ~ ~ ~ , - - - ~ { - 675, (L; ti~v} ~ . h j I ~ _ ; - - - - .PROPERTY LINE !t;~ ' l~ I M 'tl ;i ~ v. t,,„,t, 5011 }Y r SFpGIM1k J ~ ~ 1 G ~ . ~ I 119LF-8" SAN. " I ~ p : PVC ®0.19% ® ~ ~ ~ w w PROPOSED POTABLE SERVICE ~ G p _ _ _ s ~ SAW. ~ SAhI. M.H y5 I HARRISON I I ~ Iy' ~ J T 0 . ~([1(~1 ; rn RiM = ~ ¢ (~)PdV RIM 50,55 <I, ~ , , (s)iNV=~i a2 ' viLw~E ~ °1I SS SS PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ _ _ ~ 4,052.64 SF _ I ~ k~ ~ ~ (t~`Itav=21 ao I FFE = 32.5 . ~ ~ Z ~ ~ r _ _ ~ ~ I I ~ , FS FS PROPOSED FIRE SERVICE ~ ~ ~ ~ N R ~ PRESSURE , ~ ~ ( ~~,~'I r ~ ~ xo J `i zv cNn -REGU~ -REGULATOF BY CLEARWATER C ~ I cj 1 N ~ ~ ~ r r ~ ~ ~ I Gas ~ ~l l ° g I - cas ~ ~ , j.1 +,,i 'Ur EXISTING POTABLE SERVICE = Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ / I I J e: ~ , 1 ~ t I' ~ ~ ` SS SS EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE z ~ ~ . 1 ~ / J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i l ~ ~ "z I ~ ~ FS y r ~ FFE=20.33 y v} h I ~ . FS F5 EXISTING FIRE SERVICE ~ ; 1 ~ P ' ~ FDC CGPINECTIGN LGCAiIG l ~ ' / I U ~ s° sAN~ FLUC ~ ~ ~ X X-~E 9~ X X~C EXISTING UTILITY PLAN TO BE REMOVED At ASSE B 1 D.LP. FIRE H iDR JT M _ ~ p ,~1 I I (1) 6"Xf)' TEE U L~l FS FS I INV = 2s.~ I 29LF-5" SAN. I FUC ~ 1.OOio ® ~ I I ~ J ~ ~ , - / I ' - J I GENCFA70R ~ ® a,~ o LF FIRE ~ER19CE ~ ~ i:;~ ~ UTILITY NOTES F z ~ (1) DDOV W/ 6'YPASS METER ROOM - ~ N SET Bl' CITY ~ I ~ Q ~ I ~ ~ (r) s,`e TEE ~cc.v. v ~ . , 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE .LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING W O ~ FIRE Hl'GRANT A~SEMBCi I i a~J, ~ ~ ~ , s°::a° TEE cv UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED ~ U ~ 0'J ~ ~ ° ~ (1} 8 D.LP. FIRE =ERVICE ~ - , FS FS ~ O (1) DDCV W~ BYPASS METER FROM THE CITY -0F CLEARWATER UTILITY ATLAS. ® -FOC CJrJNECTION LOCATIONy ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w 'o~ ~ --J_ ~ r I ~ - - - - - SET BY CITY _ - ~ -O ~ ~ ~ (11 3"xE" TEE dtG.V. ® ' ~ j ~ ~i 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND COORDINATE WATER T - I r. I~,~ I ~ ;Q.. j SERVICE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. W r~~ ~ f~' it HARRISON I A Z O W f vILLa~E ( f`~. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND COORDINATE SEWER ~ ~ ! _ I I ~ , a F C~ RETAIL8lJN1TS ~ I ~ ,Ij W a ~ I I.: SERVICE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. a ~ ~ 9,552.67 SF ~ ~O < ,u 1 / ~ PARKING GAR4GE 1 ! o J' & ATTACHED LIMITS I FFE = 32.5 v U, ~ ~ ~`Lj„__ r cn 66,916;63 SF b ~ J I ~ cU e I I ~ ° I.; 4. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL Z U ~ I -1'~ POWER SERVICE WITH LOCAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. W 8° D.LP. W.M. ~ IMI~I~ ~~I:r'~ H ~ ~ / I FFE=3tW f / . ~ I E I. I ® u ~ ~ a ' 5. SEE SITE BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR LOCATION ~ , r / ~ I. POOL DECK ~ ~ OF OTHER EXISTING UTILITIES. I I I I I ~ ~ I - f ~ DESIGN BY OTHERS - ~ I ~ I ~ja 6. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL UTILITY NOTES. !T J / e ' ~~~I ~ I F ° ti 7, INFORMATION DEPICTED REGARDING EXISTING UTILITIES IS Y / ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ p ' 'I ~ I a. ~ APPROXIMATE AND IS NOT FIELD VERIFIED. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT .y I ~ r ~ r , 300LF-8" SAN.__ ® ~ z'~ ~ OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR WILL FIELD LOCATE & VERIFY ;t PVC X0.190 I ~ ' ~ ~ ° EXISTING UTILITIES e.g. TYPE OF UTILITY, INVERT, CONDUIT MATERIAL 1 / I i r~l ~ /o ~ ,I.I = I ,I:°;+°~~„ ECT. AND CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES oo ~ ~ ~ I I- I AND/OR CONFLICTS. ~ o° ~ ~ ~ / ~l I ~ Q F-I ~ oo` 1 r ! b ~ c~ n L ~ r I `-0T 8. UNDERGROUND WATERMAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED, AND COMPLETED ~ I-''I "~(L)~~ ~ 1 ~ .,T, I `'T I ! ~ AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AS PER NFPA 241. ~ O - ifi / L \ (1),8" WAfkR METER ~,I I ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~a~ ~ w ~ :T"' I ~ i 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL FIRE SERVICE LINE FROM TAPPING ~ \ 6"x8";TEE cc G.V._ i I ~ \ (1) 0 \ (1) BACKFLOW PREVENTER ~ ~ ( I ~ .a~~~ II! SLEEVE & VALVE TO THE LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER p"I l ~ A ;ktTSTA1LED6Y CIT'r' rn I ~ AND FROM DEVICE TO BLDG. ~ (1' 11 • \ ATrC1WTlERS-EkPEWSE cene~rau w OAS METER & PRESSURE _ ~l ~ -RE~TULATOR sr cLEARwa.TEF ~ ' I 10. INSTALL A KNOX KEY BOX FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS AS PER ® ~ H GAS ~ / I ~ I , NFPA 1, SEC. 3-6 AND INSTALL PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION. ~ ~ ~ II ® HARRISON ® ~ ~ E-I ~ INN ELEV=24,55 / F E~1SilhJG S4M & GAS TO BE a VILLAGE I y I ~ . 11. THE CITY. OF CLEARWATER AT APPLICANTS EXPENCES, WILL REMOVE/ n~ FlRE HYDR~jNT FFE=20.33 REMOVED PER DEMOLITION PLAN-~ - ASSE SLY RETAILBUNITS ~ I ~ , ~ RELOCATE AND/ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO BE RELOCATED AS PART s,552s7sF ~ ~ OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING RECLAIM WATER METERS. ~ W W O.V. 6,. SAN. STUB ~ W ~ INe ELEV=13.94 m FFE=32.5 ~ ° „ ~ NO METERS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN ANY IMPERVIOUS AREAS. z ~ ~ArJ. M.H. #1' s3LF-la Pvc sAN ~ jj o r~r,~ RIM -18._5 4 ~ ~ a ~ pz, ~ ~ i(S)IN~ =1_^^,OO_ _ ` ~ ?OLF-6" PVC I I ~ d N ~A~ 9 MHOI!rE., 1, ~ ~ Q ~.J SAN. M.H. ~3', g - ,}Q L1 I (F)INN =12.10, o - _.1 -l ~ - ~ _ ~ ~ 1~""~, sarJ. sTUe RIM=as,s~~, _ o ~ ~ ~ N INN -1=._0 - ~ ~ i - W ' ~ ~L 2s4'~ ~n I 12. WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, ~ w 205LF-15' PVC SAN SERVICE-~ ~ (W)IJJ 4.UOi ® U ~g 4 ~ i (w)IrJV=23so ~ m ® I ® IE - ' ~ ( THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO Z ° a ' s I II CONSTRUCTION AS PER NFPA 241 w w I- 2&2.41'(L} , BRIM 19 45 ~ 0 0 cn waresouNO ~ a !(S)IIlV 22.9n ~ ~ w n incnnoN I (E)IPiV=22&° r cn „r,•, . , I ~ I , .,.~~''~~S 13, FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN THAT STATES nom. a ~ ° r~~ s~s°° TEE t I v~ "NO PARKING, FIREDEPARTMENT CONNECTION" AND SHALL BE DESIGNED IN CC ~ , - LL I - ~ 6' G~ ® ~ ~ I ~ ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS FOR - - - - ~ i 4. ~ ~ - rn y I ° INFORMATION SIGNAGE AND BE MAINTAINED WITH A CLEARANCE OF 7 1/2 FEET Y Y Y Y Y m ~ ~ i~ \ i RIM h3rHOO a I I ~ I ~ IN FRONT OF AND TO SIDE OF APPLIANCE, AS PER FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION - - 0 LL ~ ~ S SS S SS SS 5 uD SS SS W \ i SraG - - - (s)INV =2.50 $~I E~rr~ t CODE, 2001 EDITION. MODIFICATION TO SECTION 3-5.6 OF NFPA ~ ~ f,E)Illy-22 al i FS - ~ ~ - FS FS - ~f- FS=• r~5 --F'S =~tFT' TS - ~'f ,T -fS -F~-- fr ~-F6 ~-FS-~~ F~ F •°1 FS FS FS FS FS fS - FS ® °,N)11lV =2239 ~ ® ~ L Q U7 I- to ~ 3~zr-~ 55 SS N N SS ~ ~ 55 55 55 SS 5' - - ~,nl TERS i,, ti S4P!-' >I 14, FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL HAVE CLEARANCES OF 7 1/2 ON THE FRONT AND SIDES. ~ w ~ w w ~ i I~j 90' E~04Y~ ~ ' Q ALSO, WITH A 4 FT. CLEARANCE TO THE REAR OF THE HYDRANT PER NFPA 1, w ~ ~ ~ ~ S ' ±ER •I, (1) 6"z6~ 1EE i J ~ O ~ ~ o REMOVE EXISTING SAN. MH ~ i;j t ~ ~ 1 6"x8" TEE & G.V. ~ , ~ ~ q Z 6" d,i.. IRE SERVICE - ~ w 247LF-B" SAN. ( ) enck,FLOw RREVEwTER I~ SEC. 3-5.6 v o° o 0 1NSTALLEU BY CITY AT OWNERS I a ~ ~ ~ U ~ U U ~.~1 ~ CO CT 2A' BLOWOFF ~ ~ PVC ®0.19% ~ -UO' ~ Q' ~ - I ~ AT E D OF 4 W.M. TO SIN ~ - ~ ~ 8 D.LP. W.S. E};PEP~SE ~ ~ ~ I O ~ z ~ < I I ~ ~ ~ 'I 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE RELOCATION OF POWER & LIGHT POLES WITH } ~ ~ ~ ~ ° • , , l~ i 35LF-4" SAN. PVC ~O I~ I I I ~+`.I ~S1.00% SL6PE h11PJ. L 'f~~l~ ~ ~ ~ a • S8y 5~ ~2 16?.OJ i M RUCTURE u 5 - c I O~,.,_~~ i 59LF 8 SAN. ' 0 5' ® ~ a;,' ~ WITH THE LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY. ALSO THERE SHALL BE A 2' HORIZONTAL ~ w ~ w w ~ s°SAN. FLUr, ~ I I I CLEARANCE FROM THE EDGE OF SIDEWALK TO ANY VERTICAL STRUCTURES. o a ~ a a ~ ~~38LF-8" PVC ~~61&~9~H ~ ~ ' GOR 'n PVC ®246% I ~~~i I I I ~ I INV=24.35 ~ r' > > > ~ c n?.NlTA.I?'i' 1~4d~NH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ LIFT STATION Rli~h EL = 25.'8 I ~.A`.- w~w~~ o V ~ y I ~ 16, AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL REMOVE & RELOCATE N ~ v ~ ~ SEE SH. 9 N IE _ '12.88 C?„ ~ wOOD I °'I ANY/ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO BE RELOCATED AS PART -0F THIS ~ ~ ~ FOR DETAILS s IE = 22.4; ~ S~EO 2 z ~ w ~ WETWELL W IE = 24.Q2 I ~ 0 W W k f I ~ DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING RECLAIMED WATER METERS. (NO METERS SHALL BE ~~~~N Q r° ~ ~ i RIM=18.25 i-~-?-' e - ~ ~ ~ W' o N INN-11.75 MATCH EXIST. N INN OF EXISTING M.H. ~ ;j ~ I ~ LOCATED WITHIN ANY IMPERVIOUS AREAS.) ° ° ° ° ° ~ ~ r OJ Qi cV I~ cy Q 4 w o z o SAPJIT.ARY SEWEP, ~~dAIPJ ~ ~ SAN. M.H. #3 NONON d' (0 61 ~ M v° Q ~w UWYI~l0'JVN SI?E ~ RIM =31.2 ; ~ g ~ (F)INN =24.00 4u " ~ ~ I (N)INV =23.95 ~ Gas METER ~c PRESSURE ~ I cL 17, ALL PLANTINGS WITHIN ANY EASEMENT WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE PROPERTY o 0 0 I I MAIN REGPJCATOR'BY CLEAP.WATER ~ ~ ~ I ~ 4 ~ ~;AS z f y I el OWNERS RISK. THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY/ALL UPROOTED d 2" GI CLEAF'V~"- RR_,~ ~ REMOVE & RECONSTRUCT EXIST. FRE H,~R~ANT ASSEr~sL~r w/ ! I I I I OR DAMAGED PLANTS WITHIN EASEMENT(S) IF THE CITY NEEDS TO ~ ~ z u _-(r) s~s° rEE ~ MAINTAIN/REPLACE EXISTING UTILITY MAINS, zw>- ~ . GAS FAIN-~F II SIDEWALK AS NECESSARY FOR I'i Ul ~1 ~ e' G.v HARRISON ~ ~ I ~ ' I € ~ 4 INSTALLATION OF 6" FORCE MAIN I FD( F~ccoNNECrIarJ vlu~t~E I ~ I ~I~' ~ 18, WITH THE VACATION OF THE EXISTING OSCEOLA AVENUE, ALL CITY UTILITIES r~~~~~',`w ~I J 176LF-6" FM i 1 ~ - 'i LOc LOCAT14tJ 4,0T1.31SF ~ ~ I I I~. cunt i ?r crr nrn-r~n nnin I?CrMInrG(`TGn eT eDDI If dtvITC FXPFNCF ~..f `~z FFE 325 ~i inuu uu iuwvn iw nivv nwv vivw ~u (1) 96' ELBON EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT L4 1 ; z ~v 19. IF THE PROPOSED PROJECT NECESSITATES INFRASTRUCTURE MODIFICATIONS TO br ° W !JAS a_De ELhC CVCPNAPiC iS;Pp" x24' WET TAP INTO EXIST. SATISFY SITE-SPECIFIC WATER CAPACITY AND PRESSURE REQUIREMENTS AND/OR 1 I NI A, \ \ 24" FORCE MAIN s d WASTEWATER CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS, THE MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE COMPLETED IFfCLRWq . 1 5 I.~ LLB` _ f u-a - VAULT CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE STORM ' T BY THE APPLICANT AND AT THEIR EXPENSE. IF UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND T - 11!~ I CROSSING WITH EXIST. ELECTRIC POWER j. 17v - w, =I HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, THE INSTALLATION SHALL BE COMPLETED AND DUCT BANK - SSLE#GzRir o+, r FCM a IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS, , r 1 .5, KAS WALL ~w ti 16" VVM-DIP l'1 R C x1 6" TA 4`'q s x1s' TAPPING SLEEVE ~ a 20. CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH PROPOSED UTILITY a.r rF.z'r I~ArIHOLE SAW CUT, REMOVE, & & VALVE { e' m P l \ R EXISTING ASPHALT (TYP. , s = & VALVE JEj MIST.' AiTARY r• MANHOI F.. c., IYDRnNr CONNECTION TO TAKE PLACE IN CITY STREETS. CONTACT DON MELONE FOR MORE ~.o, s HR-,2 IPRIEL = 25.46 moR. r,.31 E E 200 201 RIM EL 30 Ir =4' = 222.41 _ 5 2015 I y I FILLED Ih'/ DII R''"' EL 30.55 i INFORMATION 727-562-4798 Ow FILLED ,ar DIRT Pr zoE 07 _ •03 54' RCP h 1 IE = 22.30 -74'° SAN- 4- - T~ RECCF 'ifi `-P 0.75 MAS Way ~ 11 _ nAI METER INSIDE RECr'tif~icu 7ti"f=R~'~ DETER INSIDE 21. THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL PROVIDE WATER TAP, SET THE METER AND A RAWN BY: RJM I 91.,=11D WITH WATER o ~s t T r U-1. a/ = J J•` -S J~ _ J S~ - -g,14 2-1 UNABLE TO MEASURE xfi _ _ 1 3a 35 %4" ` ! A B.F.P.D. IF APPLICABLE. APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCIATED RI?> SEES arX4---1--- 'n}'=tlf -1 d l: \ + I i~ --4-, - 'J• J :.J U,L , 1,',' 14AS WALL VJ V, SAW CU Qz- L tR 11'1 C. FEES AND ALL OTHER INSTALLATION FEES. HECK BY: KEz - `aA^+ITARY 0~-~ 19)'x_ C~• J a FXr, 5' c_ -L- ^ r -ti REPLACI REPLACE EXISTI G ASPHALT c` _ c } ijr~ L_AR,% TER G5 ' RIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 iE = 2r:o 22. ALL FDC S SHALL BE LOACTED WITHIN 40 FT, OF FIRE HYDRANT AND AT LEAST N14 b 1 ST l' j Tp 1 ~r it - ~1 u LwuP v,roR« sit - vaK 15 FT. FROM THE FACE OF BLDG. FDC'S AND FHA'S SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE SHEET MAS 2 'C I CL.-AR-WATER x I z i;( f - SHED GAS MAIN' CoNTA, CONTACT CLEARWATER GAS 10 RELOCATE SAME SIDE OF THE ROAD. i T AND O j LOCATI AND CONNECT NEW GAS AT APPROPRIATE LOCATION TO EVIST. GAS MAIN I.{p rrr I I TI 23. SEWER AND WATER IMPACT FEES SHALL BE PAID BY THE DEVELOPER PRIOR TO SSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. CONTACT STEVE DOHERTY AT 727-562-4773 6 OF J I i j 4' vNTIES CONC. SIDEWALK See Index No. 201 mlh Grass Plantin or Other 4'~ Dro Match Existing if 9 P 5' R~sl Non-Walking Surface 4" Drop at All Drives z Z 1/+' / hT. MIN. IXPANSION JOIM mlh deht• Existing Sidewalk 1" Dro at 5,~ o--~° qr I0I p Wearing •°`o•...°` o'°, o•°, o ° to • 5i. All Drives eo. MoD 11-1/2"R Wearing Surfac Clay Or Cement Varies I f ~ ° i°~°~~' rlq Grass Planting or Other ~ SUrfaCe 4' CONCRETE SIDENGI.I( Sl• ~ " ~ - Brick Masonary z c- At Terminal eiDAiDtr eoNC cuss 1 w FlF£RMESH 9 c~ti Non-Walking Surface 3/4 R ~ ~ / : 6" 6" 6 Vertical Curb ~ ~ , ~ `co I Manhole t SDEWAlIi To eE iANA1uM a' THICK CONCRETE (B' MIt9MUM AT DRrvEwA~rs) RAMP CURB in Transition ~ ~ : • ' ' ° / 2, SIDEWALK TO HAVE 1/2' RADIUS TOOLED EDGES. / • ry:':: 3 ~ 3, COf1TRACRON d01MS TO BE A MIMMUM OF 1 1 'AND AT IN1EfNAlS SPECIFlED Bf EDOL A' • ~ : ~ ~ ~ : Q • ~ ~ 4, EXPANSION JOINTS ARE REOUNFD BETWEEN RDEWAll(S AND CURBPJG, DRNEWAYS AND NL ' ' • • • • • I~ / \ m R ~ : io • se o L FIXED OBIECTS AND A T INIERVAlS SPEgFIID Bf FDOT. Ba ~ •'P•',:~~ N ~ Bottom Of ' ~ Base ~ 5. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL CONSIST OF CONTINUOUS 1/Y X 8' BTNMMOUS IXPANSION `SAO - ~ ~ % ; SRGP, D ~ c`~y ~ j ;p;:;;q~: ~ A t o A Corbel ~ Q ~ a.J , ~ - & MTNDAIM CROSS SIJ~E 1/4' TO 1~-0`, MAXIMUM 1/2' TO 1'-0', OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ~P~,c° F} T ~ 9~~ ~ 6" '1 Z'~ . 12" CD s 1- aARFAUUNDERPROPOSEDSIDfli'ALKSTOIE COMPACTED PERfDOTSTAIiDPRD ~~s~~ f,~ '°F - - - Compacted • ~ ,y ;4~•:~ 0 SPECIFlCA110N5 118-8.2 0 . ~G Flow Line • 'Subgrade , 8. DISNRBED AREAS TO BE SODDED AS DIRECTED D! 1HE ENGINEER UNLESS NDICATED s ~ f~ ~ Exist. T e I Curb ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~4''~''~' .Compacted. ~ - 8" ,~B„ Min, 8~, I i ~ ~ •Subgrade• Or To Suit Pipe oTHIDZ~sE ~~c ,6 s a> 1P Remove Back of Curb ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ' 6., 9. SIDEWALK TO HAVE BROOM FlNISH, ss P ff Existin ~ ~ 10, CONCRETE SWd1 BE WRm PER FDOT STANDARD SPECIFlCAIWNS FOR R04D AND BRDGE y, o~ ~P '9 \ \ S1RUC110N SEC110N ~ \ CON 520-8 '~i~, ~ / RETURNED CURB RAMPS »E„ Q If "x" is less than 48" then i /ix~//~/%' SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION VALLEY GUTTER CURB the slope of the flared side ~ shall not exceed 12:1. NTS STRAIGf Nal:wfAUY,a' ISOMETRIC VIEW STRAIGHT CURB - u~ z Square Bottom ~ f ~ ~ l Permitted Ew+alsloN Joa1r smug Jolnr ExPANSiaN Janr I VALLEY GUTTER CURB NOTES, .CURB DROP CURB » coNC. RAMP 1. There shall be a 1/2 seal joint between TRANSITION CURB TRANSITION .BACK OF SIDEWALK back Of CUrb and drlVeWq . int between PLAN SECTION A-A G Textured Surface y 2. Concrete in curbs shall be 3000 psi, with ?00 psi, with ~ ~ ~ TYPICAL siDEwAlx PLAN EouALTOSbEWALX , a ; ° fiber mesh reinforcing. A B C D E F G ~ o~ 1MDTH (6 MAXIMUM) ~ . d . 1 2' BITUMINOUS S1RIP - d' ° a Shallow 0'- 4' 2'-6" 4' Max 3'-6" 24" Max 8" #3 at 12" E.W. ~ ~ ~ m / - - - 4„ a Q: BRODMFlNISH ,e.ti~o~ ,;,{•Jd TZ:~ MAX. Standard 4.1 ~ 6 3~-6" 6 Max 4 30~ Max 8 ~ 5 at 10 E.W. ~ Z G ~ r N S i ~1.~~,:.. ~:!'4n' x{41\, i.`o~ i:'`'< n PLOW LINE 'Y'ay~., ~..f:S$~' T,;Sw,T;,;¢~y.c. t7+~Tn,.,; T:y Dee 6.1- 10 3 -6 7 10 4 48 Max 12 #5 at 10 E.W. ELEVATION A-A EXPANSION JOINT STRUCK JOINT STRUCK JOINT SECTION B-B , , , n i , , n n n uhf Deep 10.1 - 14 3 -6 7 14 5 48 Max 12 #5 at 10 E.W. i J ~Z r 7 NOTES: - U.-.I > ~ i~' r; ~ 1 G~ I!T ' 1. Ramps are designed to the otES: Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA U ~ " c " soEwaxs sHAU NAVE TOOLED EDCES. PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION JONTS SHALL BE LOCATm AT STRUCK JONTS OR E16'ANSIXJ JONTS ONLY. - t0 Comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION NOTES PUBLC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 1. All concrete to be 3000 p.s.i., sawN BY DAn: EXPANSON JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOAN ANO ALONG EDGE ABUTTING CURB 2. Ram s Shall Have a Tactile Surface, Textured to a RE tO~AMSIaN JgNiS SHALL CONSIST aF CONTINUOUS T/2' aIIUMIN0U5 EXPANSxN1 SiPoP, AS SHOWN. " 1 4/14/ss leamehk view rodrarm REORANN BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK DATE Dept Not Exceeding 1/8 by use of Tamp or roller P.w,D• t s3 A l~o,ro Br 2 gt with fiber mesh reinforcing, a ~ In Conformance with ReqGuirements of FDOT t 1/GS Added noG CHE~ BY CURB CUT RAMPS emEtt Na t +/a/D2 Rec Noce ILO. CS° Roadwa and Traffic Desi n Standards, Detail 304 PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED 1 p~m TYPICAL CURB CROSS DrDIX C]EOD:1D STORM SEWER INDOC N0. 't.° Ra w,~•S SECTIONS 1D1 I 4/s/oz Rev Nola R.C. DESO~o BY MANHOLE DETAIL 202 ~ CONCRETE SIDEWALK y 9 Or Most Recent Modificahons, REV. DATE T~SaIIPTIDN aPP• Dm~ BY 2 OF 3 B't~ °~RPnON A~• ~noN APP. DESDNm BY 1 OF 2 REV. DAn: DESQnPnON APP. C.M.H. 1 aF 1 ZZ-I Q R TI N D NST UC 0 ETAIL C . t 5 'v 0 8~ e~1o1 ~3' Transition NOTE: Wings only, if NTS ~ 2 r _ ,0F ~(~oco~ ~}1y Side Slo es Re mre. RBmaVe Curb If Existing Fi ~ = Z D ~ S^.tr d. _ , „ Q oey EXISt COnc Exist Conc Drive Q ~ N 2„ o~ Back of Curb Max Slope ~1^ 1„ 1o Max Slope W a ~ w A A Non-sl' ace re uire- ~ -T--~ ip surf q C~ O~ ments, see Note 8. e COO -'r. ~ o 0 4., r • . Loo ?r 4° Construction Joint q 0 ire 1 2° Ex .Joint SECTION A-A ; 5 ° ~ A ~ ~ ~ 6„ / P Permitted (TYP) ~ t`~e58 ~ o a' °o o° ~ 1/2" Exp. Joint I ~ o o `t ~ I NORMAL VALLEY GUTTER CURB ~ o~,e 2 M ~ IYxet' o ~ ~ e ~ Pro ert R.0•W Line TYPICAL DRIVEW>< ~AL DRIVEWAY CROSS. SECTION SEC110N -SEE INDEX 101 B ° a ~ , ~ 2 ~o~o 0 j A C 6"R (TYP) Z Q Z _ °p I °o m Conc. Sidewalk iA I o ,p o B B _ r1N ~ .PLAN VIEW H ~a NI ~ 1- ~ A B C ~ ~ U " ~ 9 = N o j M = ~ N w R 6 3000 PSI ~ ~ ~ _ ~ CONCRETE PAVEMENT a, N 2 s a o a 4' Min Residential Street 1' City R/W ~ ~ ~r.~ a TYPE E Remove Back. of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut ~ ~ a 3 M N. - •r' ~ ~ ~ N o or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. i~iv ~ 5' Min Arterial Street 2' County R/W i Limits of concrete Swale Limits of pay quantity 3.._ MIN. ~ Approx. Weight 465 Lbs. - o L° Modified and Valle Gutter Curbs • ~ i / N y 1/4" per Foot I i'% , .o join exist back of curb ~ .i; Z o CAST .IRON GRATES ~'r • PLAN 2' ~ ' X 12„ Textured Surface ~ ~ w: Max Sloe / ' ~ Back of Curb 3 Curb 3000 psi conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" 12 COMPACTED SUBGRADE • ~ i' o p ? • ~ c ~ „ 3 -4 r tl TO 98% MAX. DENSITY ~ ~ „ 4-4 5 3 4" ' w thick at driveways with 6x6 $10 1 ~ ~ 5 3/4 " ~ * Remove to an ink Lp 3-0 = ~ ' ~1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut welded wire mesh. See note 7. ~ ' ' • , ' ' • ' tea ~ ~ SECTION A-A SECTI( „Gra -f = N SECTION B-B ~ • . ~ • ~ ~ ~ Q ~ CI. Eye Bolts ~ ®M NOTES ~ H SECTION B-6 ~ 4 6 Continuous ~ Q ti See Index ~ % 1. Provide toiled Joints at distances matching the width. Nso 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a dept e, textured to a depth not N ~ _ ~ ® place expansion joints at driveways. exceeding 1/8' by use of tamp or ro8er in canfarman ~ o ~ 1 2 If some physical obatructlon exists which prevents the placing requirements of FDOT Roadway and Traffic Design Stal ~r rope In conformance with id Traffic Deslgn Standards, = I a o ~ of sidewdke ae shown, contact the Engineering Division fa Detail 304 a most recent modigcations. ra ~4 Bars ¢ ~ c0 0 0 altemote location. cctlons. ; SECTION C-C ~ W NTS ®12" Ctrs N N m m 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks ar N ddvewayti. Q NOTE: ~ p' 4. No coatings of any kind wRl be permitted on conaete SECTION sidewalks or driveways without specific approvd of the City CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA TYPE E Engineer. a 4/a/oz Rev. Noce R.C. 5. All concrete shill be 3000 psi min. ®26 days, with fiber ~ rza PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION Sub' ct to Cit En ineer s a royal. PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING Je Y 9 PP ENGINEERING ~ N TYPE E „ " mesh reinforcing• z t/se added note ~ Straight Bars 2 x 3/16 6. Concrete surface to be Ilght broom ilniah, note ~j• BY TYPICAL SIDEWALK ~ 3 To be used only In unique situations. CONCRETE SWALE ~"2 ~ I-~-I Recommended Maximum Pipe Size: Reticuline Bars 1 1 4" z 3 16" Conaete driveway construction shall ba 6" thick w 6x6/1ox10 t 11/03 momfled orb cut Jwa „ „ „ „ / welded wire mesh relnfacament. orb ~ ~ aEacm BY CONSTRUCTION AND II~DDC Np, gEga:D DETAIL NDIX Na r , T•C•J• RAMP DETAIL tDB VALLEY GUTTER CURB 1117 ~ W 3~ 0" Wall_24" Plpe Bands 1 1~2 x 1 4 REV, DATE IT~RenaN AI'P. D~ 4 -6 Wall 42 Pipe Approx. Weight 21 Lbs. ~naN APP. DE9CNm BY 1 OF 3 AEV. DAIS DESCAIPnoN APP. DE51~ BY 1 OF 1 N Z C.M.H. W STEEL GRATES INLET E NOTICE: Steel Grates Are Required ~ W ~ On Inlets With Traversable Slots 2 1/2" TYPE S-I ASPHALTIC CONCRETE ~ o~ And On Inlets where Bicycle Traffic Is Anticipated. TWO SEPARATE COURSES i 1ST COURSE: 1 „1 2" TYPE S-I ~ POOL RETAINING WALL w a tt t~ 2ND COURSE: 1 PE S-I POND BOTTOM ^ ~ ~ v NO, SOD OVER a DESIGN BY OTHERS Q o w FDOT TYPE E INLET GRAVEL AREA EL = 6.00 ~ ~ z 8" CRUSHED CONCRETE j NTS BASE MATERIAL U U . ~ ~ W (LBR MIN. = 100) 1' o o w o: ~ _ a•. a a ~ a ` ~ N0. 57 ROCK WITHIN / / / / / / „ / / / / / / / 12 COMPACT STABILIZED SUBGRADE 0 0 0 ~ as AMACO 45/45 FILTER ~ TO 98% MIN. MOD, PROCTOR. VALUE N N N ~ O FABRIC ENVELOPE Y Y Y m PER ASTM D-1557 (LBR MIN. - 40) MIRAFI 0 0 ~ Q NO LIMESTONE ALLOWED FILTER 0 0 ~ VEMENT E TI N DETAIL PA S C 0 FABRIC 0 in IMPERMEABLE 30 MIL FDOT TYPE H N O 0 0 0 N .PVC LINER ON TOP, CONTROL STRUCTURE Q ~ ~ N0. 57 ROCK WITHIN 0 0! o ~ z w NTS O 0 SIDE FACING RETAINING 6" PERFORATED w ~ ~ AMAC0 45/45 FILTER 0 O .WALL AND UNDERNEATH J ~ o I FABRIC ENVELOPE ' ~ DRAIN WITH SOCK ~ o ~ 1 MIN. 30 MIC PVC w ~ NO LIMESTONE ALLOWED O 0 O 0 PIPE INV. EL = 4.75 0 ~ z Mechanical Joint Tee with 0 0 I LINER OVERLAP } ~ J o EL= 5.75 ~ ~ ~ a Com ression "O" Rin with n - U w o: - 2 6 WEEP PIPES o' o_ w 1>> 0 0 P 9 branch cast into manhole wall O 0 a U O O O 1='`>1St'??G??>??'>>ss??a>?'``'>;>~'">s?'?>'', INV. EL = 4.75 ~ ~ O 0 ~ > w .O. O. ;o~ w> 0 0 O 0 N w #i#IFILTER:is>ss::ss:: ~ w o :isai:.~.:;isiii;:?:~:>:>:•> ::::::....................;;:;:::::i:ai''iiii':aii O ~ ~ o~ 0 0 ~::::;I>:SAND;;;;,;,;;;;;,;;,;;,;>. 0 O O EL= 4.75 0 0 _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ .PVC Pi e p If Sewer is PVC, a O III-I ~ I-I ~ I-I ~ I-I ~ I-I ~ I-I ~ I-III-I ~ I NON Q I-III-III-III-III-I ~ 1=1 I I-I ~ I-111= o -Suitable D.I. Pipe D.I. to PVC Adapter I I I=1 ~ 1=1 ~ 1-1 ~ I-~ 11-1 11=1 I I_ iii ~ to of Size to ~ shall be used. 0.25' 0.5' 0. 5' I-III-III; I" 0 0 0 I C I-I I1= ~ N M O fit Tee. 1"x18" ~ o~ Stainless Steel ~ FILTER SAND I sA ~ DATA IIIIIIIIIIIII Z I LTER N U 1° 2' I-III-I I o: w> N 'o z to L Stra o CLASSIFICATION p ^ I a - - III-III- ~ ~e~ LASSIFICATION: SP (ASTM D-2487) I~~~III~~~II N o COEFFICIENT C OEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY: 4.03 x10 e1,• z z o EFFECTIVE GRA FFECTIVE GRAIN SIZE: 0.25 mm-11i- ~~•z <r MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC w Use 3/8" Red Head Anchor o ? . . A . • . • • . • . • a UNIFORMITY Ct a • a. NIFORMITY COEFFICIENT: 2.80 = a MIN 1 OVERLAP AT w% to attach to existing wall v ri c`` ` o• ;4 `~•0'`°•4 Stainless Steel Straps PERCENT PASS - See Detail ERCENT PASSING #200 SIEVE: 0.3% ALL SEAMS z~ . c' °~E .tti\. C9N g w STRAP DETAIL SECTION A-A FILTER BLEND ILTER BLEND SAND & WELL POINTING. ` z'} UNIFORMITY Cc PERMEABILITY iNIFORMITY COEFFICIENT = 2.8- , 'ERMEABILITY = 4.82 FT./HR. o ORIGINAL WITHIN AMACO fITHIN AMACO 45/45 FILTER o RAE.1; >N FABRIC ENVELI ABRIC ENVELOPE o~ z w NOTES NOV 2 3 2~~5 DRAWN BY: RJM 1. P.V.C. pipe entry requires manhole adapter coupling CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA by Flo Control Inc., or approved water stop coupling. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STORMWATER SAND DRAIN FILTER DETAIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CHECK BY: KEZ CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 OVO INSIDE DROP DATE CHECKED BY DETAIL 8 91 INDIX NO. • SANITARY SEWER 302 WS BY SHEET REK DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DED.GNE 3 OF 3 7 OF 9 i I I i R \ L L_ 9 5/8" ~ z n.t.5. n.t.s. Cleanout Plug ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ L Back of Curb Max. 15' -Min. 4' or Concrete Pad 4" 10 5/8" Ed e of Pavement Connecting Piece w/integrally p ~ Fire Hydrant Assembly 18" Min. g cast Mech. Joint Gland on T , ~ YP ) Thick x 1'-6" Sq. ~ 9 7/8" ~ ~ I,~C~I;~lfj. 24 Max, one End-D.I. Rotatable Mech. ' Distance Varies Valve Box Joint Gland on Other End. „ ~ f ~I ~I~'i~~';~fi 6 or 8 - 1/8 Bend ~ ~ 0..i i~~l~llljlh Len th Varies TY ~ 9 ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ See Note 1) I ~ Q ~I~l'I~N~F~~ I ~ Plug j ~ I Valve and H Brant Tee y (See Note) I , I I w/D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint c ~ 0 Mech: Joint Gland on Plain .End Branch. 8„ ~ r ~n 1 Valve ~ 'J j ~ I, ~ .J ~bl~l~ I N, I Mech. Joint Valve Sewer Main 13 1 /2" z ~ ~ r III~II I , ' ONLY APPROVED j Kennel Guardian No. K-81A Y CLEANOUTPLUG DETA L z ' Muller Centurian No. A-423 CLEANOUT DETAIL z I Water Main I U.S. Pi e Metro olitan P P N.T.S. J ~ ~ 7 NOTES; N.T.S. NOTE: Cleanout plug to be ~ `--J ~ ~ NOTES: 1. On Hydrants Requlring Runout Restraining Joint (Typ.) U,~r U.S. Foundry 7621 1. Steamer. Connection to Face Street. Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained or equal. 2 All Fire H drants to have 5 1 4" Valve Seat. CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA y / PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA IATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT E~ Z ~ 3. Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street Garners ENGINEERING ENGINEERING or in the R.O.W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines ~B'' pB'' TYPICAL HYDRANT °A~ REDRAW ~ TYPICAL HYDRANT °A~ 01 15 92 B.V.D. 01 15 92 01 ei5 92 A 0.r STANDARD 11 0 95 Zi 0 ~ .Whenever Possible. a+E~meY SETTING 1ND4o2D' CHECKED BY SETTING INDEKNa cNEacm er CLEAN OUT IN 4020. INFIX No, W DESa~D ~ CROSS SECTION DEga~m PLAN VIEW 402 4. See Sheet 3 for Typical Connections & Fittings. REV, DATE DESCRIPTION APP. REV. DALE T.C.J. 2 OF 4 DESCxBPnaN G.C.H. 3 OF 4 0.r Sanitar 304 ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 OF 4 ~u uA~ oESaePnoN T.C.J. 1 or 1 a a ~ o0. o00o axw ,a o00o W 0 0 0 o 0 0 Flaw ~ ~ ~ ~ Tapped Flange ~ gross Nipples 2" Backflow ~ TaPPed Flange W Z ~ W 0 0 0 f (Typ.) f Preventer A di ~ [-I NOTES: ' Ball Valve ~ / ~ Ball Valve Wa~'~ 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W., APPROX. 4 FT. BACK OF CURB UNLESS .OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. To View p 90' Brass EII 90° Brass EII ~J ~ Z 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET NO. 3 . THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIV SIO . Approved Backflow BYPASS DETAIL ~ ~ ~ W I N DRIVEWAYS SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. Ford Meter Flange Prevention Device (Flanged) f Approved Backflow ~ ~ a 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED and PRESSURE TESTED TEST FOR ONE HOUR ~ 150 P.S.I. ( ) Preventer ~ ~ ~ UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE Ford Angle Resilient Seat Plate Strainer Resilient Seat ~ OS & Y Valve ~ OS & Y Valve TESTING and CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON .THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. Valve (Flanged). Flow i r 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. Flanged Tee i Flanged Tee 5. SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECT V ~ IONS TO 4 P C MAINS. SADDLE IS ~ Flanged 90' Bend ~ ~ Flanged 90° Bend REQUIRED FOR 2 ;SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 6 and LARGER PVC MAINS. LARGEST SERVICE ~ ooa o o aoo f CONNECTION TO A 4" MAIN IS 1 1 2" and LARGEST TO ANY MAIN IS 2". / 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO 0 36". Brass Nipple Uniflange Meter BE N T LESS THAN Meter (Flanged) Threaded Corporation Stop', Curb Stop MUELLER H15008 MUELLER. H14350 with Lock Win and ~ 12" ~ D.I. Pipe 9 v or approved equal Com ression inlet or oved e ~ ~ E o P aPPr qual o (Tap at 45° Angle) •••:~n !~J Q 12 !Supports ~ Q H - U Ir-~ Saddle if Re wired q See Note 5 I M.J. 90' Bend i M.J. 90° Bend ~ W w g Water Service Tubin Flow ~ ry Q Driscopipe 5100 or Endot/Yardley TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE 1 1 /2 and 2 MODELS TYPICAL COMPOUND WATER METER SET W 'X I Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene I Saddle shall have double , I NOTE: I n.t.s. ® E-~ stainless steel stra s ~ NOTE` 1 P Device must be installed level. t. 0 S & Y Valve Handles will be Chained and Locked. ~ I~ ~ with epoxy coated ; 2. Meter Sets will be Painted After Installation. ~ ~ a 3. Bypass Pipe & Fittings Shall be Threaded Brass. ductile iron bod . CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA y PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 0 0 0 S S 0 ~ 9RIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ ~ Water Main ENGINEERING ~ APPROVED R.P. DEVICES ~ APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES P BLI W RK ADMINI TRATI N ENGINEERING ATION ~ APPROVED R.P. DEVICES ~ APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION BVD Y 01°15 92 Hersey-Basco Model FRP II Hersey-Basco Model FDC REOr~I~eY TYPICAL. METER SETS W/ 02 94 Hersey-Beeco Model 6CM Hersey-Basco Model No. 2 ENGINEERING ~ w W~ 02 94 Ames 5000 SS Ames 2D00 SS R~MJPeY TYPICAL COMPOUND 02 94 WATER MAIN SERVICE REV, WATER SERNCE CHECKED Br Watts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or 007 BACKFLOW PREVENTERS 1 12/22/94 TUBNG TYPE GCH IN O' Q CHECKED BY IN 4050. CONNECTION DETAIL Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 1 1 2 and 2 MODELS RS IN 4050. Watts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or 007 cNEac~o er WATER METER SET IwIXSa ~ z REV. DATE DESCRIPTION APP. DE9GNED BY 1 OF 3 REV. DATE DES~PTION App. BY 20F5 LS Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 ~ 90° RISE 2 OF 5 ontE o~PnaN oesoNm er w 3",4" and 6" MODELS 3 Of 5 ~ Q Q I w z ~ ~ F ~ z 1 1 2" DETACHABLE ADAPTOR / CONNECTION AND CAP W/ 0 o W TYP C A ~ 1/A ~ 1/E SETT f~ G ~ ~ W ATTACHED CHAIN S THE FO J T LLOWING DINTS MUS BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: n. t. s. I N N ~ n.t.s. 1. BEND -INLET AND OUILET 2. TEE -OUTLET BRANCH Y Y 3. OFFSETS -INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS ` I` Q ~ 5. PLUGS LL 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS fir, ~ ~ ~ Z Adjustable ~ ~ ~ ~ I 2 1/2 x1 1/2 REDUCER L Me alu Restrainer T Valve Box ~ ~ o 9 9 (yP ) F L o~ o ~ 0 a When Valve Occurs in Roadway, ~ ~ o o ~ set Base on 10-Common Brick. ~ ~ ` w 1 I w~ o //r,./, N ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~ / / / Ebba 1500 Series T . rs-~ i/, m o 0 ' ~ 0.0 of %i , N O Q d= cD ~ O O ON ALL TEES, A MININUM OF 5' SHALL BE RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG N O o , L =MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FlTTING (ft.) FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE: Z Water Main ~w> N-~~N S" PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM a+""~h~ rc° ? w Mech. Joint Valve , a" ~1ro coY„I~o ~1 ~ NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE 0 0 BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT T rcesuammg %jolnt Zr VALVE BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 NOM. ELBOWS (deg.) RESTRAINERS. PIPE TEES DEAD SIZE 11.25 22.50 45 90 BRANCH END e e 90' Bend 2 4 9 21 28 46 CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA 4 2 )RIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ' ~ w MJ X SLIP PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 6 3 6 12 29 47 65 ENGINEERING 4TION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING w 8 4 8 16 38 66 85 R BAV D 9 02 99 rr;, zr 9 02 99 REDRAWN ~ TYPICAL VALVE 01 D15 92 - k ? m ti" CHECKED BY THRUST IND4 NO. INDqt ND. GIECKEDBY SETTING Ir~x 403 CROSS-SECTION 401w DESIGNED BY RESTRAINING 03 REV. DAZE DESCRIPTION APP. G.C.H. 1 OF 2 a-En 1 aF 2 REV. DATE APP. DE GNED BY 1 OF 4 o .:I- m 0m zw ORIGINAL RECENED DRAWN BY: RJM CHECK BY: KEZ NOV 2 3 2005 ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SHEET CITY OF CLEARWATER 8 of 9 i I I I I I I i ~_J i ~ GENERAL NOTES ~ L u~ FURNISH AND INSTALL EBARA SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS: i DESIGN CONDITION: ~ ~ MOUNTING POST AND SERVICE 2 cy6" CAST IRON COUPLING (2) 6" FLANGED SWING CHECK VALVES MODEL DVF 7.5 HP ~ y DISCON~JECT W/ LIGHTNING W/ .OUTSIDE LEVER AND WEIGHT GPM 230 42.5 FT/TDH !il~l!,~I~~~,~~'~~II~;'j!~' ARRESTOR PER LOCAL CODE o, o W/ COMPRESSION RINGS VOLTAGE 208/230 THREE PHASE (BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR) ~ - - MOUNT CONTROL PANEL ON DISCHARGE 6" 180 MM IMPELLER HINGE SIDE OF ACCESS ~y~ ~ SEWAGE PUMP: 1. RATED FOR- TWENTY (20} STARTS PER .HOUR. Q COVERFOR OPERATOR SAFETY ~ k o o 2. AIR FILLED MOTOR .DESIGNED FOR SEWAGE. APPLICATION WITH CLASS F INSULATION. L / / ° O° ~Q O o 3. DUAL MECHANICAL SHAFT SEALS (SILICON CARBIDE /SILICON .CARBIDE) • f ~ LOCATED OUT OF THE PUMPAGE, IN A SEPARATE OIL FILLED CHAMBER. ~ ,J 22„ ~~~ra Q:. o~ N CENTER ~ 4. HIGH TEMPERATURE BALL BEARINGS B-10 RATING OF 60,000 HOURS, ~ w ~ ~r ~ / LINE UPPER AND LOWER BEARINGS -SINGLE ROW .TYPE. ~ ~ z ~ G ~ R~ ~ rr~ o ~ Chu 5. PUMP SHAFT HORSEPOWER (BHP) SHALL NOT EXCEED MOTOR RATED HORSEPOWER ~ w y ~'.I ~ o ~ a o THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE OPERATING RANGE OF THE. PUMP PERFORMANCE CURVE. ~ ~ > ~ r.i r..~ P ~ r,~` U rug ~[iu HOSE BIB W/ BACK `l~~\ ` ,i~ f 6. SINGLE PHASE MOTORS SHALL BE DUAL WOUND, CAPACITOR START-RUN AND CAPABLE OF OPERATING ON 208/230 VOLT WITH A 10~ TOLERANCE VOLTAGE FLOW PER LOCAL CODE i~ (190 TO 260). THREE PHASE MOTORS SHALL BE DUAL WOUND AND CAPABLE OF ~ Z ~ (NOT SUPPLIED BY TSC) _ _ OPERATING ON 208/230 VOLT WITH A 10~ TOLERANCE VOLTAGE (190 TO 260) o OR OPERATE ON 460 VOLT BY CHANGING THE MOTOR LEADS INSIDE THE PUMP.. W ~ ' I (3) 6" FLANGED RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVES ALUMINUM HATCH: TSC MODEL-66R (66") ROUND WITH 30" X 48" LOCKABLE HATCH, a U ~ ~ W/ OPERATING SHUTOFF HAND WHEEL REINFORCED FOR LOAD RATING OF 300 LBS/FT WITH HOLD OPEN SAFETY ARM, a a ~ a ~i ~ PLAN LOCKING DEVICE FOR HASP TYPE PADLOCK AND STAINLESS. STEEL HARDWARE. Wax ~ WZ~~ VALVE BOX, FIBERGLASS COMPOSITE (H-~ 10 TRAFFIC RATED) WITH INTEGRAL BOTTOM. A ~ O H :::.1,~~ 48" X 48" X 36" COMPOSITE VALVE BOX (H-20 RATED) (FOR 4 DISCHARGE PIPING FXF HEADER SYSTEM) a ~ w FL DEP-LOCKABLE CONTROL ALUMINUM TOP 48" X 48" DOUBLE DOOR LOCKABLE HATCH PANEL GENERATOR RECEPTACLE SS HINGES ANU HARDWARE 300 P.S.F. LOADING SHALL BE 48" X 48" X 36" WITH ALUMINUM TOP 48" X 48" DOUBLE DOOR ~ 0 Z ~ LOCKABLE HATCH, REINFORCED FOR LOAD RATING OF 300 LBS/FT, Z U ~ LOCKING DEVICE FOR HASP TYPE PADLOCK AND STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE. ~ d+ W o (2) GAS-TIGHT SEAL OFFS 30" X 48" LOCKABLE HATCH SS H ~ U (1) F/G JUNCTION BOX HINGES AND HARDWARE 300 PSF LOADING ACCESSORIES: #304 S/S -GUIDE RAIL, UPPER GUIDE RAIL BRACKETS, CABLE HOLDER, ANCHOR BOLTS AND PUMP ;LIFTING CHAINS. ~a ~d2" VENT C6) HOOK SS CABLE HOLDER ".1:; (2) ~1" SS GUIDE RAIL BRACKETS VALVES :SHALL BE SEWAGE SERVICE DESIGN LEVER AND WEIGHT CHECK VALVES AND RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVES OPEN 100 WITH 2" SQUARE OPERATING. NUT. Q BYPASS CONFORMS TO .,I'.: LOCKING HASP PRE-CAST, REINFORCED 64-604.4(2)(A)F.A.C. PIPING: 6„ AWWA C900 ~ CONC. 8" TOP EL. 18.25 FLOAT SWITCHES: UL LISTED SJ ELECTRO MODEL (SJ 30 SWENO}. TOP PUMP SUPPLIER SHALL PROVIDE SUBIMERSIBLE PUMPS, SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES, ~ Q ~ FIELD INSTALL CONTROL PANEL, JUNCTION BOX, FLOAT SWITCHES, ALUMINUM HATCHES AND ~ p~ ACCESSORIES TO INSURE PROPER OPERATION AND WARRANTY. ~ p W DUCT SEAL (2) SS LIFT 24" II Q ;C; ~7,: CHAINS THE COMPLETE PACKAGE PUMPING STATION SHALL HAVE PUMP BASES, ~ ~ SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES AND DISCHARGE PIPING ASSEMBLED BY ~ ~ TECHNICAL SALES CORPORATION READY TO SHIP FOR FIELD INSTALLATION. O THE MANUFACTURER OF PRE-FAB PUMP SOLUTIONS ~ ~ H CONDUITS ° ° TECHNICAL SALES CORPORATION, 4621 N. HALE AVE TAMPA, FL 33614 (813)876-9256 ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CONCRETE POSTS x` ~ emrcu sarES ro ortNN ~ w ~ 15" IPVC INLET ~ ~ za ~ w ~ PIPE FIELD LOCATED i ~4` FACTORY INSTALLED 42" PVC ~ U V.1 TECHN CAE SAEES CORPORAT ON Z ~ a EL: 11.75 I LINK-SEAL~(THLS-300S) (NP) DISCHARGE ~b6" U U Z 4621 N. HALE AVENUE 0 o w INLET I FOR PUMP DISCHARGE PIPES AWWA C900 PVC PIPE TAMPA, FL 33614 ~ a EL. 11.50 4 ~ 2" X 2" RUBBER COUPLING 8.13 876-9256 FAX 813 874-1194 NNNQ Y Y Y Q m HIGH LEVEL ALARM ~ ~ ~ ~ (2) 6" SCH AWWA C900 DISCHARGE PIPES y EBARA 80 DVB, DVBF 3, 5 HP DVF 7.5 HP Synchronous Speed: 1800 RPM ~ ELl 11.25 I PRECAST, REINFORCED CONCRETE, MIN. Single up to 5 hp and Three Phase 3 or 4 Inch Discharge ~ LAG PUMP ON ~ 8" THICK WALLS Design flow: GPM TDH/FT 3 ~ z z aW~~ EL. 11.00 2 ~ 60 ~ooo 3'~ SOLIDS o z z ~ww Z LEAD PUMP ON ~ ~t.. (2) EBARA PUMPS 50 1so,~m } ~ ~ ~ o ~ EBARA LM80 QDC .GUIDE RAIL SYSTEM-FOR ~5HA Uwo:~ a EL. 9.00 r..:= . i 40 FU~~ ~~q. o a n. a ~ PUMP OFF PUMP REMOVAL WITHOUT ENTERING WETWELL o (OSHA & 10 STATES STANDARDS EQUIPMENT) o m S Hp N = 30 << Olq, ~ ~ i (2) 80 X 80 FLANGE ELBOWS ~ 144m~3 0000 Np w i 20 ~3pmm 3 HA ~<< DMA. ~ o N ~ Q rRl ~cooio 0 ~ ooo~ 10 ~Nrod~ o 96" I.D. a;' Z t i~ . 0 K W 1 - IA ..-_~,~Z Ul `CONCRETE BALLAST AS REQUIRED (FIELD INSTALLED) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 O C U- YD I Capacity US GPM I ' STATION DEPTH = CONCRETE = 3,699 LBS CU YD = 10 CU-YD r•. 4' I:. I r. a. r a 4, a r•. 8Lo%~ ' Y ra W EL. 5.60 d.. ~ r 4 .f . 4. •r EBARA 80 DVB, DVBF 3, 5 hp DVF 7-5 hp January 2002 ! ti al w 9 . . BOTTOM d •4.4. 4' ••.•14 'y a .4, 'a' .y' ~N z -4 2- ILI d, r.. "Q 4 •,4 . 4• i .4 ;4. • .'}y.' '4 .,d' a • 4' r a yr r Uj A '14 _ W Q a r ; ' 44Y . ~ a i' y a:. FLOW Cf FLOW CALCULAITONS: ORIGINAL 'Q V) SECT I ON (324 UN (324 UNITS)(250 GAL./UNIT)+(18,893 S.F. RETAIL)(0.1 GPD) RECEIVED o= 82,889.30 GPD ZW » = PRE-CAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MIN 12 BASE 82,8 NOV 2 3 2005 DRAWN BY: RJM PEAK FL PEAK FLOW: (82,889. 82,889.30 GPD 1 DAY/1440 MLB. (4 PF PLANNINGDEPARTMENi CHECK BY: KEZ ( ) ( ) \ ) CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 = 230.2 = 230.20 GPM PEAK SHEET 9 OF 9 i r ' r ~I ~ SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 15 E., ON P TI CRI ES D PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA PARCEL ONE: • ~ N O T ES S 1 2 AND 3 OF A.B. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS A PORTION OF LOT , S COUNTY FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST AND A PORTION OF PINELLA , ~ 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE, BEING ASSUMED AS S00'16'19"E. S A AND B OF BERGENS REPEAT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 26, PAGE 41 OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA OF LOT 2. SURVEY MAP AND REPORT OR THE COPIES THEREOF ARE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL AND A PORTION OF A VACATED ALLEY PER O.R. BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. • ADDI110NS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY O1HER THAN THE. SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED. OF SAID LOT 1 OF JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, ALSO BEING THE INTERSEC110N OF THE SOUTHERLY BEGIN AT 1HE NORTHEAST CORNER INE OF GEORGIA STREET AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT=OF-WAY UNE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE; 1HENCE-ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY L 3. NO EXCAVATION WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE 'OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, - Y LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE 8.00'16'19"E., 530.62 FEET; 1HENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY . WESTERLY RIGHT-OF WA ENCROACHMENTS, IMPROVEMENTS, STRUCTURES OR FOUNDATIONS. UNDERGROUND U11UTY LINE LOCATIONS (IF SHOWN HEREON) ARE BASED UPON UTILITY PROVIDER ATLASES AND VISIBLE SURFACE EVIDENCE. RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF JONES STREET, S.89'59'22"W., 100.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG A UNE 100.00 FEET WEST OF AND.: PARALLEL WI1H SAID ' WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF NOR1H FORT HARRISON AVENUE N.00'16'19"W., 528.34 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY 4. RE-USE OF THIS SURVEY FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN WHICH IT WAS INTENDED, WITHOUT WRITTEN VERIFlCATION, RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF GEORGIA STREET N.88'40'45"E., 100.02 FEET TO 1HE POINT OF BEGINNING. WILL BE AT THE RE-USERS SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO GIVE ANY RIGHTS OR BENEFlTS TO ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHOM CERTIFED. CONTAINING 1.215 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL TWO 5. ALL FOUND POINTS ARE UNMARKED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL PERIMETER BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE ALSO FIELD MEASURED UNLESS NOTED. PROPOSED OSCEOLA AVENUE 6. THIS SURVEY IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY JURISDIC110NAL, HAZARDOUS OR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS. 3 4 5 6 AND 7 OF A.B. &JENNIE CAIES SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 OF THE PUBUC A POR110N OF LOTS 1, 2 , , RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE VACATED ALLEYS PER O.R. BOOK 1270, PAGE 1731, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, 7. THE 51TE APPEARS TO BE IN FLOOD ZONES X, AE (EL 12), VE (EL 14) & VE (EL 15), ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER FLORIDA AND A POR110N OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SEC110N 9, TOWNSHIP 29 50U1H, RANGE 15 EAST AND A POR110N OF LOTS A AND B OF 12103C0106G, EFFECTIVE DATE. SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 (MAP INDEX NUMBER 12103CINDIA, MAP NUMBERS 125096, BERGENS REPEAT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 26, PAGE 41 OF 1HE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF A D ALLEY PER O.R. BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A POR110N OF LOT 3 BLOCK I VACATE L E G E N D 'I" ` 125103, 125139 EFFECTIVE DAIS SEPTEMBER 3, 2003). POLARIS ASSOCIATES, INC. AND THE SIGNING SURVEYOR 2 OF JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWAIER HARBOR AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PG. 13, PUBUC RECORDS OF HEREON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS DETERMINATION. THE AUTHOR OF THE MAP, THE K~ FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, OR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER _ HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART,. ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. A/i A/C = AIR CONDITIONER UNIT BACKFLOW PREVENTER SUCH MATTERS SHOULD BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO ANY JUDGMENTS BEING MADE FROM THIS INFORMATION. THE BLDi BLDG =BUILDING ABOVE REFERENCED MAP STATES IN THE NOTES TO 1HE USER. THAT "THIS MAP IS FOR INSURANCE PURPOSES (C) = CALCULATED DATA ~ =BOLLARD or POST ONLY". SAID LOT 1 OF JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, ALSO BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY (C COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE;`: THENCE ALONG THE CCI CCR =CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD ®=BOX, CABLE TELEVISION ' ' 5"W. 100.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; 1HENCE S.00'16'19"E., 528.34 CL SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET S.88404 , CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE ®=BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY 8. ANY ZONING INFORMATION SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON 15 BASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE DURING THE CMP =CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 0 =BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY (TRANSFORMER) PREPARATION OF THE SURVEY. THIS INFORMATION. SHOULD BE VERIFlED WITH THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY PRIOR TO FEET, ALONG A UNE 100.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF NOR1H FORT HARRISON AVENUE; CMI " " LIST OF ENCUMBRANCES FROM: CONC = CONCRETE ®=BOX, TELEPHONE ANY DETERMINATIONS OR DESIGN. THENCE ALONG 1HE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF JONES STREET, S.89 59 22 W., 50.00 FEET; THENCE N.00'1619.W, 527.20 FEET; CON LONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA. STREET, N.88'40'45"E., 50.01 FEET TO 1HE POINT OF BEGINNING, FIDELITY NATIONAL 1T1LE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT N0: COI THENCE A COR =CORNER kt =DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE CPB = CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK ~ =FIRE HYDRANT 9. SHOWN ANYWHERE ON THIS SURVEY, THE WORD "CERTIFY" IS UNDERSTOOD TO BE AN EXPRESSION OF A TA05-117566 DATED APRIL 27, 2005 CPI C T = CURB TIE FLAGPOLE PROFESSIONAL OPINION BASED UPON THE SURVEYOR'S BEST KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AND THAT IT G 0.606 ACRES MORE OR LESS. C CONTAININ p A THROUGH H = DEED DATA FLARED END SECTION THUS CONSTITUTES NEITHER A GUARANTEE NOR A WARRANTY. D PARCEL THREE DI COMMITM ENT N0: DB ~ DEED BOOK ® GRATE INLET DIP =DUCTILE IRON PIPE ® 10. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE PROPERTY DESCRIP110N AND EASEMENTS`SHOWN WERE FURNISHED TO POLARIS FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 0 -054-1403678 DATED OCTOBER 14 2004. ECM EXISTING OSCEOLA AVENUE 4 ' ECMP =ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ~ =GROUND LIGHT ~ ASSOCIATES, INC. AND ARE PRESUMED TO BE CORRECT. NO SEARCH OF ANY PUBLIC RECORDS, FOR EASEMENTS, E EL = ELEVATION F =GUY ANCHOR DEEDS, ETC., WAS PERFORMED BY THIS FlRM FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS SURVEY. EP = EDGE OF PAVEMENT ~ =LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING THE EXISi1NG RIGHT-OF-WAY Of I .THROUGH L AND Q E A PORTION OF , 0 N ALLEY LYING NOR1H OF LOTS 2 AND 3 OF JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO ERC ERCP = EWPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE ~ =LIGHT POLE, METAL 11. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFlT OF AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO OSCEOLA,AVENUE AND A PORTION F A ED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 13 OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS_COUNTY WAS OWNER'S POLICY ORDER NUMBER f CLEARWAIER HARBOR AS RECORD AS1T~0 TITLE SERVICES, INC. ALTA FCI (F) = FIELD DATA ~c =LIGHT POLE, WOOD ' EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD. FCM =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT ® =MAILBOX FORMERLY A PART, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 7681-PI-04 DATED JUNE 8th, 2004. FDO - FI FDOT = FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 1RANSPORTATION ©=MANHOLE, ELECTRIC ! 12. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NA110NAL GEODETIC SURVEY BENCHMARK "429 FLHD" HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 22.51 I COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 OF JENNIE CAIES SUBDIVISION, AL50 BEING 1HE INTERSEC110N OF THE SOUTHERLY FIR =FOUND IRON ROD ©=MANHOLE, GREASE 1RAP j AND NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY BENCHMARK "HARRIS J" HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 30.52 FEET, NORTH FND = FOUND NAIL & DISC THE STERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE; THENCE ALONG 1HE M THROUGH P FN ~ RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET AND WE FOP =FOUND OPEN PIPE Qs =MANHOLE, SANITARY SEWER ~ AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988 (NAND 88). I S 88'40'45"W. 212.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG 1HE EASTERLY FO I SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET , ' 89'49'02"E. 49.23 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY FIDEUTY NAT10NAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT Fl' FPP =FOUND PINCHED PIPE ®=MANHOLE, STORM SEWER RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE, S.00'19 25 E., 333.32 FEET; THENCE N. , ~ N0:04-054-1403609-A DATED FEBRUARY 16, 2005 FRR BOUNDARY OF A VACATED ALLEY PER O.R. BOOK 7546, PAGE 607, S.Ot'01'42"E., 12.50 FEET; THENCE 5.89'53'10"W., 66.67 FEET TO A F~ FRRS = FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE ©=MANHOLE, TELEPHONE 1 13. TREES 4" IN DIAMETER AND LARGER HAVE BEEN LOCATED WITH COMMON NAME AND APPROXIMATt DIAMETER F/T = FENCE TIE ®=METER; ELECTRIC BREAST HIGH. SMALLER TREES, NON-PROTECTED SPECIES (INCLUDING ORNAMENTALS) AND TREES WITHIN AID CU D SA D LY ALONG S RVE AN I • E CE SOUINWESIER NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, TH N NO VISIBLE ENCUMBRANCES ~ FXC = FOUND X-CUT ®=METER, GAS ~ JURISDICTIONAL AREAS (If ANY) HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED. OF OSCEOLA AVENUE 15.74 FEET 1HROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'02'38" (CHORD BEARING S•49'19'36"W. G EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE , GE = GRATE ELEVATION ®=METER, RECLAIMED WATER I' IE = INVERT ELEVATION ®=METER, WATER } 14. MEAN HIGH WATER LINE ELEVATION OF 0.42 FEET (NAND 88) BASED ON MHW POINT ID 872-6725, EPOCH ~ i 15.66 FEET ; 1NENCE S.00'04'22"E., 12.90 FEET; 1NENCE S.79'39'30"W., 80.02 FEET; THENCE S.00'4T26"E., 12.31 FEET; THENCE N.89'44'18"W, i ~ SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE BY THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES: 1 - CHICAGO 111T_E INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER S POLICY NUMBER I 55.03 FEET; 1HENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF ( (L) = LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA ~ =MITERED END SECTION M 1960-1979. I N.00'50'40"E. 59.79 FEET; 2 -THENCE N.89'58'45"E., 121.94 FEET; 3 -THENCE N.00'21'07"W., 334.58 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE 10279610600000017. ~ ~ , LB = LICENSED BUSINESS MONITORING WELL LS = LICENSED SURVEYOR © - I SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID GEORGIA STREET, N•88'40'45"E•, 40.02 FEET TO 1HE POINT OF BEGINNING. NO VISIBLE ENCUMBRANCES MA MAS = MASONRY ® =PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL MH 0 LESS. C ES MORE R 478 A R CONTAINING 0. , N MHW = MEAN HIGH WATER ® =SANITARY CLEANOUT NP = NORMAL POOL 0 =SCHEDULE B-2 ITEM !~I 0/ PARCEL FOUR 0/A = OVERALL ® =TELEPHONE RISER C LAT BOOK 1 (I OR = OFFlCIAL RECORDS BOOK = 1RAFFIC SIGN 1 (P) =PLAT DATA ®=TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX A POR110N OF LOTS 4, 5, 6 AND 7 AND ALL OF LOTS 8, 9, 10 AND 11 OF A.B. &JENNIE CAIES SUBDIVISION, AS RECOROED IN P GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECTION: 9, TOWNSHIP 29 I F PAGE. 64 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND A POR110N OF PB = PLAT BOOK ® = TRAFFC SIGNAL POLE ' 0 A VACATED ALLEY PER O.R. BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS F SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST AND A PORTION F PG = PAGE ~ =UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION MARKER PLS = PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ®=UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION WARNING SIGN 0 2 AND 3 BLOCK 2 OF JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWAIER HARBOR AS PI COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A PORTION OF L 1~ G.13 PUBUC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY OF WHICH PINEU.AS COUNTY. WAS,FORMERLY A PART AND A PC POB = POINT OF BEGINNING -UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MARKER RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 P , ' 0 THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY OF OSCEOLA AVENUE NORTH AND A PART OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29..SOU1H; RANGE 15 EAST PC POR110N F POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ~ UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WARNING SIGN PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT ® UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC MARKER ' OT A AND B OF CLOVIS C. LU1Z SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76 OF 1HE PUBUC RECORDS OF PINELLAS PR i AND L D ALLEY LYING NORTH Of LOT A OF SAID CLOVIS C. LU1Z SUBDIVISION, ALL BEING MORE,PARIICULARLY PE PSM = PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER ~4( _ COUNTY, FLORIDA AND A VACATE ~ - DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: - ~ ~ ~ P~ Pl P/T = PAVEMENT 11E ®=UNDERGROUND FBER OPTIC WA'RNING_SIGN PVC = POLY VINYL CHLORIDE =UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN M~~(ER 50U1HERLY R( RCP =REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE ®=UNDERGROUND FORCEMAI~,N,~//WARNING SIGN COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 OF JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, ALSO BEING THE INIERSEC110N •OF THE EORGIA STREET AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF NOR1H FORT HARRISON"AVENUE;THENCE ALONG THE RI RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF G RLS = REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR ~ =UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY ®=UNDERGROUND GAS WARNING SIGN • - AY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET S.88'40'45"W., 150.03 FEET TO 1HE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S.00'16'19"E., 397.79 R~ SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF W SEC = SECTION =UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER MARKER ' 5.07 FEET, 1HENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE NORTH, SE FEET; THENCE N.89 4418 W., 22 SH S.00'50'40"W. 27.97 FEET; 1HENCE ALONG 1HE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT B OF SAID CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION BY THE FOLLOWING S SHW = SEASONAL HIGH WATER ®=UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER WARNING SIGN SIR = SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB 6113 UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER MARKER 1HREE COURSES: 1 - S.89'59'22"W:, 167.07 FEET; 2 -THENCE N.00'08'39"W., 13.65 FEET; 3 -THENCE S•89'59'22"W., 77.69 FEET;' THENCE. SD SND = SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113 UNDERGROUND'SANITARY SEWER WARNING SIGN ALONG THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWAIER HARBOR BY THE FOLLOWING NINE COURSES: 1 - N.13'38'13"E•, 76.07 FEET; 2 -THENCE ~ SR = STA1E ROAD S/T = SIDEWALK 11E =UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE MARKER • " -THENCE N.19'0T43"E. 51.75 FEET; 5 -THE GE N.24'23'07"E., 34.06 S N•001833 W, 28.67 FEET; 3 -THENCE N.12"1656 E., 48.67 FEET; 4 " ~ " N ~ STY = STORY ® =UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WARNING SIGN FEET; 6 -THENCE N.29'15'19"E., 47.35 FEET; 7 -THENCE N.25'2443 E., 43.69 FEET; 8 -THENCE N.142613 E., 53:80 FEET; 9 -THENCE S' N•01'54'53"W., 40.02 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID GEORGIA STREET, N.88'40'45"E:, 355.38 FEET TO SW = SIDEWALK ~(=UNDERGROUND WATER MARKER THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ~ (TYI TBM = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ® =UNDERGROUND WATER WARNING SIGN (TYP) = TYPICAL c-~ =UTILITY POLE, CONCRETE vc TOGETHER WITH: VCP = VIIRIFlED CLAY PIPE = U1LITY POLE, METAL V W/ = WTH = U11UlY POLE, WOOD WF = WOOD FENCE oy~ =VALVE; GAS. G D LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND BOUNDED BY WESTERLY EXTENSIONS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH ~ TOGETHER WITH ALL LANDS AND SUBMER E BOUNDARY LINES AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, EXTENDED TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY AND ALL L1170RAL RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF W, W/T = WALL 11E Ry ~ =VALVE, RECLAIMED WATER ~ ESCRIBED LAND. ACCRE110N APPURTENANT TO THE ABOVE D + 25 + 25.25 =POINT OF ELEVATION sy~ =VALVE, .SANITARY 2; 25.2' =DIMENSION FROM BUILDING TO =VALVE, WATER. ®=WELL BOUNDARY /RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE ~R~ B INLETS ~ 4` ~ t aF = ASPHALTE 4 _ RS E EIRE - CONCRETE PAVE = TOP OF BANK BRICK NOV O ~ 1005 O ~ I V ~ i 9i ~ L =TOE OF. SLOPE or CENTER LINE OF DITCH I = 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED i PLANNING DEPARTMENT - = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES - - -G - - -G-- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE j CIN OF CLEARWATER - -W - - W- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER UNE i - f• - - -F'- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN - -R• - - -R- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE - - -12" PVC- - - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE C E R T I F ( C A T I O N - 24" RCP- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER LINE CERTIFIED T0: TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC I we.w't~r~ b+~ y ~ TR E C LE G E I V ~ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON MEETS 1T~E MINIMUM TECHNICAL-tin co I~ C STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS•"IN CHAP~PI ~~t I BAY TREE 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLORIDA:: ~ ; ''~~d~~~1 ` 8 = ~ : ~~'r~ ~ ~ un BOTTLE BRUSH TREE y ~v'~"I' ~ ~ G~„~, ~ ~9 Qi =CAMPHOR TREE ~ ; u. ~ r•' ~ ~ ®=CEDAR 05/06/05 e • ; . ~t ~y ~ ~ . DATE OF SURVEY v, ~'i~~ ',Yv ~ Do =CHINABERRY TREE J N 0. DIEHL, PROFESSIONP~L ~N URVEYOR'~ ; pov• J i Q =CYPRESS TREE II ICENSE NUMBER LS 4053 ~s4EF},~ ~ STATE OF FLORIDA t Q = EUd TREE. =EUCALYPTUS TREE Q =MAGNOLIA TREE ! PROJECT: ®=MAPLE TREE OSCEOLA AVENUE Q =MULBERRY TREE ,i ®=OAK TREE ~ TYPE OF SURVEY: 0 ti Q=OTHER SPECIES I BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY a 0 = PALM TREE ~ Q= PECAN TREE PREPARED FOR.TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC a fV PERSIMMON TREE ~ =PINE TREE O O ' SYCAMORE TREE LARIS N r Q=WAX MYRTLE TREE PO ASSOCIATES INC. Dp ®=WILLOW TREE 3 ro PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING LB 6113 a •.wwwl AIIITr /AAA I 18850 U.S. HIGHWAY IU NUMM, SUIIt auu N D 0 0 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33764 O 7 N (727) 524-6500 K 3 JOD CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB NO. DRAWING PATH: SHEET 'v N m - DA1 DATE NUMBER REVISIONS BY JOD 1" =40' GRM 02-3324 H:\JN\3324\dwg\3324topo2REV4.dwg 1 OF 3. f A • i. H.. a' E. SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 15 E., •IWJ a.'a •A•.. n , z . g . ,49;5'- ' : a : POOL ° G:.'. g 0. HARRfNGTQN SUBDf VISION iy 4 . < a°• .~.A Gl W. d.. ° `.xa•. ~`~-APPROXIMATE 1.4' X 1.4' CONCRETE COLUMNS ~ ° PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA : d. . ~ U1 • ' • , . •°a. ' FLOOD ZONE LINE w1T1i wooD Fr:NCe (1rn) p.l.., ts~sss: f?LAT,:B.OOK.S, .PAGE ZT ° ~ . . ; ' •Q.O PODL.b CK". . °d• GRASS / G WALL ~ CONC DE~K•:' CONCRETE RETAININ , : J AREA FXC ' 4 .a .•d ° y{ ^ T1 Sy ~'f a ~ ° . SND S o ~ .A Y 1~~~, .a, ' 0 . ~ ° •CONCRETE RETAINING WA ~ FXG / I ~ ' GEORgk S1R ~ . 1 PO ~ SOUTHERL R W LINE • ' ;CEL FOUR ~ ~ • ° oB . I I TREET °s`::. ARCEL THREE PARCEL TOUR GEORGIA S . 5 • I I F v RCEL ONE •SIR g.~ ' ~ ~ •212.46' a•''• 150?03'° ~.150?O3°° ;~~~.sie EL TWO'. .••d..•.'.,'~`,~.09': PAR ELS 2 4 ~ • ~ d f ~ 88 ~ 8'4 4 0 0 I , '40 4 . E . 2 FIR 5/8" 4 0 0 ~ N~$'~ 4J toy. a 5• ° NE°`~ RNER' OT 1 " FNp B 021 e: - o 'o • a FC ~3 FOP i .3' 1 . 1 .9'' o a OUT OF R/W ~e = BLDG. - - 675' (L) 24.9 FIR 5 8° LB ro d a ° . i S O.1 d. • 0.2' M 1 M' 3776 / I I ~ 1. 3 'd ~ S D.3' I a 1 .0 ° a ' ` ~ ° ,5' OUT OF R/W ° ' ,4 30 15 0 30 •e I PARCEL E ~ .i' p 7 / 3 e (1 ~ 15 PG 221 J ~ I :at ~ a B (C OR 35 ~ A C d j 3 M o N ~ T. PN` . / PWl' 13;4 _ ~ . o M~ I E L I R _ 1 .2 c~ W W / r o e e N e ~ I I ' (A ~ I • .~•.r•' h° ~ I 1 .15 4.~• LINE TABLE g ~ ~ I . 0 o m ~ I/ m~ ~ J ~ ' ' LINE BEARING DISTANCE ~ L1 S00°50'40"W 27.97 00 0 1 ~ a w ~ ~ ~ 4. ' ' L2 N00°08'39"W 13.65 s ~ ~ PARCEL E w ~ LbT 6 r OR 3515, PG 221 ~ ~ ~ ~ r 1 18.6' _ : 'asp . - - L3 N00°18'33"W 28.67 ~ O ~ ~ 4.r ~ ' L4 N12°16'56"E 48.67 2 ~ ~ ~ 1 I FCM 3"X3° 18.T (p~ORAINAGf AND UT9UTY EASEMENT L5 N19°0743"E 51.75 - O.R.800K 7270 PGS 1731-9732 • _ I w ~ / (El ~ - ~ - _ - --t N A,~l & JENNI CATES ~ _ :I L6 N24°23'07"E 34.06 ~ a SUBDf SfON ~ w M a o. P. 1 G. 64 coT 2 •a , I L7 N29°15'19"E 47.35 W y O ~ ..N L8 N25'24'43"E 43.69 N z:o'" L9 N14'26'13"E 53.80 ~ (D~ M ~ II µN' ~ ~ I a R IrtJIAI~r i?nrr'C C`i ~ nn ec~nni i v ~ ~o LO 5 ~ o Q y. v I n. a,G ULIVIVIL vniCJ JvC~.~IvlJiviv ~w M L10 N01°54'53"W 40.02 ~ ~ w PARCEL E ~D` o ~ ~ ~ p~ ~?u ¢F ° ;C ~ c3'•t 3 Y' ' ~ ~ o° OR 3557, PG 559 ~ ~ ~e I a.:° N : ; L11 S01 °01'42"E 12.50 7.3' L12 C ao . c. M ~ O Z , , ~ 4 2 m c ~d Z - - - - - - - S00°04'22"E 12.90 s L13 S00°47'26"E 12.31 Z ~ try . <u ~ I V d' w J~ 4, Z ' ~ ° - ~ a~ m ~ W o M° .I ~.I SPAR FOUR . a o w ~ ~ o, d..a Z 'PARCEL FOUR ~ Q~ I I `i N ' d N p ~o cor 3 ~ CURVE TABLE 25 , Q r / . ~ ~ CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA (r~ ~ 4 J j I ~ / ~ ~ : ~m o•. ~ ~ Lor 4 ~ ~ ~ ° C1 45.00 15.74 S49°19'36"W 15.66 20°02'38° ~ a ~ o PARCEL E ~ I I e' ~ 3 ~ OR 3557, PG 559 O / / s . d J. . ~ 4 '.i .Y FXG:'_. : j m° / .4 I ~ - ~p ~ 2 s' , . ~ - PLAT L/ E o ~ / - - _AT C/ E 2 • ' ~ ~ e 3s` . ~ JURISDICTIONAL LINE TABLE E a.4' LINE BEARING DISTANCE ~ JD L1 N88'39'45"E 31.58' I D ~ •:a•; ~ O ~ ° ~9' a'° ~ JD L2 N32'49'39"E 53.01' li p I I s M ' ~ a' JD L3 N63'41'46"W 32.99' i N N e APART-OF SECitON 9~ TOWNSNfP 9 ~ ~ ~W ~ o a ~ ~ ~ • JD L4 N06'S4'19"W 21.10' h 1 ~ SOUTN, RANGf 1'5 EAST FIR 5/8" ' p. ~ o~ . PARCEL E (G a. r r JD L5 N08'01'05"E 4.20' OR 1324 PG 520 N I ~ ~ PLS 2865 M •d _ e e 47 N0.8' 11 O ' ' _ JD L6 N14'3T47"E 20.04' ~ ~ ~ JD L7 N48'14'05"E 35.95' I 0 ° 'd.' ° • ~ ..PARCEL ..ONE ~ ' • ~ N ~ JD L8 N56'52'07"E 30.96' j ~ ~ ~c 75D' L ~ / FCM 4"X4" OHL y N OD . - :.6 ~ • : JD L9 N08'5T14"W 44.96' r~ I O O ~ ~ m O SIR + FCM 4"X4 ' 104.69 , ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' JD L10 N1T49'4d'E 44.83' ~ FIR 1/2° I I .1 2937 r ~ Z Q ~ i O• ~ O N 0.3' l I/ I u~.i~g ~ JD L11 N20'11'09"E 30.87 wTi a O :a JD L12 N21'2T38"E 48.24' r ~ 7 i m , : ~r ~ JD L13 N03'49'03"W 23.41' J ( .1' ~ i I v _ ~ r / 4 a O (Q~ ~ 1 I ~ o a I a' z °o . <3 I ~ I ~ d' z • ~ I .1 ~ , A PAR OF•SECTION 9, TOWNSNlP 29 FDP 1/2" A PORTION OF :a. FLOOD ZONE NOTES GOVERNMENT LOfi4...:. . ' ~ SOUTTH~{{~ RANGE 15 EAST ~ a • : E o.5' '~T 4.3• °a. ~ .4 'd .APART OF SECTION 9; TQWNSNlP 1. FLOOD ZONE LINES SHOWN ARE DIGITIZED FROM THE FLOOD MAP (SEE PAGE 1, NOTE 7) OBTAINED • 1/ ate, s . . I -d 29 SOUTH; RANGE 19 EAST FROM FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY WEBSITE. MAP SCALE IS LISTED AS 4 / • ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ d P CEL TVI V ~ I d c' APPROXIMATELY 1" = 500'. LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE PER MAP. CGL ~ 2. FLOOD MAP LEGEND IS LISTED AS FOLLOWS: p ~ PR POSED OSCE( R P AVENUEeEOLA FlR1/ a I • ZONE AE -BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED. ~ I AVENUE • I 1 n ( L Vie. ~a~ • ZONE VE -COASTAL FLOOD WITH VELOCITY HAZARD (WAVE ACTION); BASE FLOOD w a.9 - I ELEVAl10NS DETERMINED . O.R. BODK 1231, PAGE 70 I NL ,2. o I •T .T JD L1 ~ I • ZONE Xshaded -AREAS OF 500-YEAR FLOOD; AREAS OF 100-YEAR FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 T - - • . • - ~ FCM 4"X4" ' - Fxc N89 58 4 1 1,94 FIR:..: N89'4;~ 02 E,, 49 23 3.2' s3o.oo' VACATED 10' ALLEY i" ' ~ s - = - - SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FRON 100-YEAR FLOOD. ,.d ;A. V •t. 1 O.R. BOOK 591, PAGE 262/ k % ~n, D:R. B 0 7546, LITY•E SEMENt s ~ ZONE X -AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. PGS. 607-608 ~ / fCM 4"X4° ~ ~ FIR'1/2" FIR 1/2° OHL 408 ^ ~ ! n < ~ PLS: 3138 P 13 . ~ - ~ - ° as ' ° I \V~ . • ~ ~ PARC L THR D ' lllrrr . 4 (N~ . . a I I w f ~ d•:. ~ ~ FOP ~j ' J I ~ I ' d 1 1/2.. fNGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PER ' +'W 1 ~ ~ FoP 5 e" ' M LoT A ~ ccovfs' c. Lurz y ° 5 3 s' ° 0.02 O.R.800K 750. P.GS 27~-278 o SU~DIVI ON o .a ' ~,T S79 3 - -I- - - - I m° 41 ~ ~ P,B. 35, G. X76 ~ ;q z•'•;° ~ .PARCEL FOU b. o w + ~ w F/T v Z ~ r I S : FOP ~ ? " 0.9 S I.. ° . 1 sl N89'44.1.8 • • t 2° N89 4418 W D.4' w 5.09 •d SND ...'23..1' 02, LOT B ~ ~ 3 FOP 1 1/2" ' ~ ° E 0.8' 26.9' ' 23..1.•• a . . ~ : 24'' `.9 ~ r ~ / AP - - s3o.oD - - S89'59 22 W 77.69 ~ I ORflON LOTS 2 & r : , ' 1 _ o .0 BLOCK 2 SND SND ~ 'J r 1 JONES SUBDIVISION OFI LO7 B • N / ' " ' ' NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO ~ 589'59 22 W 167.07 4, ~ o. i N CLEARWATER HARBOR P.B. SND FCM 4"x4" " ~ " •d'• ~ ' • - ' •9 PG.13 HILLSBOROUGH COUN I 8 STORY BUILDING - I AC ~ p o ~ 19 W~ I V I 1 tl! C ~ O ~ / N • ;D o BERGENS REPEAT \ P.B. 26 PG. 41 - - - , • , ~ ~ 8 y , AC ~ 1,9' r r ~ ZONE VE a~ n _ CLAY CA : ' -~f7 (EI 15) T_ - \ - - ® ~ ~ FIR 1/2" I I PLS 3138 ~ DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ~ - FIVE O.fZBOOK 7519 PGS 329 m ~ • ° ° ' ZONE X ~ ' ~ shaded r~ I ~ • . o ~ ~""l ~ Novas 2005 ~ a I ~ 1 z d' Iw ~I~ • J.• . •4 23.5' . ~ 6 cor A PLANNINGDEPARTMENT 23.5' ~ CITYOF ClEARWATER W 2 • r.., l ~ I 2 ZONE X LOT 1 LOT 2 ~Iw ZONE VE o~r° BLOCK 2 BLOCK 2 ss; z ~ss' • ° ~ JECT . z;a` . PRO o•O EI 1 a'o d >v ( 4) ~ ~ a, JONES SUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 ' 3 ~ OSCEOLA AVENUE ~ BLOC/C 2 ~ A Qlo ~la° ~ NICHOLSON S ADDITION TO r ~ ~,p CLEARWATER HARBOR P.B. 1 ~ y r2 ~ J ~ .ZONE AE + PG.13 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY TYPE OF SURVEY: BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY P, ~ ~ d' g (EI12) a a I v ~ off > - - J N I ~ < o FCM 3' ~ ~ L ~ _sas~'~w ~oooo~~,a PREPARED FOR:TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC o OH - - cw ` SIR NORTHERLY R W LINT ~ 1 Q 'HERLY R W LINE siR X9.59 ~ 50.00 siR ~ D . • JONES 1REET sas•59'22"W 50:00'. i9'22"W 50:00' em 3 ro I (UNDER C0 STRUCTION} ~ I i E ~ ~ • POLARIS AssociaTFS iNC. ©s - - - - - - S = - PROFESSIONAL SURVE PING LB 6113 Cal o I . I Jy1 ~ "ad•. .a N ' r }id en .g a s y a m 18850 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH, SUITE 500 3 w 1 09/21 - - - - o CLEARWAI'ER, FLORIDA 33764 v 09/21/05 2 ADDED FLOOD ZONE LINES AND NOTES GRM (727) 524-6500 08/04/ 08/04/05 1 REVISE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS, ADD PARCEL 5, REVIEW -hTLE POLICIES CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB NO. DRAWING PATH: SHEET 0 DATE DATE NUMBER REVISIONS BY JOD 1" =40' GRM 102-3324 H: \JN\3324\dwg\3324topo2REV4.dw 2 OF 3 x n 7.32 12,95 114.57 .n `nm 2. 8,19 Q.: •..j r.M A i. • NN g.. ~ SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 15 E., " ~ • 34,x'.. Q.•..z.'~ POOL 7.4s 49:5' 319: . , 3099•.. S NtT~Y ANHOLE . ; 229 ~ W. , , }14,06 SANITARY MANHOLE ~ ~ ' ' RIM EL = 28.86 '•'.....~x~'; • • ' ~ f APPROXIMATE N IE = 2ts7 ~ ~ ~ N ~ N .'.°`.':~.4°~.°~:~ s' I~-=2.z5 PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA . , ° • • ' ' GRA INLE FLOOD ZONE LINE NE IE = 25.04 S^ ' .o = = N _ ~ 4 a GE = 12.09 SE IE = 2294 Nc°sv .2x92 N N IE - 1.50 • ~ O ' ; • . • . , GRASS 1255 / COLUMN CORNER t ~ 9, ,.t •:~p28.' CO,NC DECK': WIE 2.31 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL 1651 20.07 WIE = 21.57 2a92 N N " " 3Q08 ' '4 ~ .E 29.79 + ~6.9g°' 9. 3D43 r ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 • d 29.68 a . a ~ AREA 16.39 0.3' N X 0.2' E d 6,99 d.'di•6 ,,„•..J••' n`; 4' q 1250 15.29 u 4D . O; •a • ` . ~ „ ,123 25.1 ~ > 2x ~ ~ ~ 0.e. < A•. .:'~~.g ° rQ, , °e ..r-----ter. * N 10"412'19" 24.7 1,75 28.10 28.71 28'85 ~ A+ X28,7 °D try X28,7 . 28.9 3DA1• 30.86 ° 3A67~ a 16:54 14" / 1103 ~#11-20 27.12 27.51 2Zfi0 .41 6~ ~O 28.7E 8" ~ . 30.52 / M "a X8.78 28:72 • ~ 16,710R=5.0 121.2 02280 x47 27.20 ? SANITA Y' AN OLE 27:72 " 14" t RIM ELR 27.52 8 V. i' • #110 I 9.9 t 6;25 i _ ~1=31:16 + ~ D 3D:59' 'd , 4.72 R=3.5 12` ~ 14" 235 E IE = 21.90 + + ~ 0 15.6 #111 • 1D" f 17.57 0 #104 26,D7 0.: " 5 IE ~?•1-99' ~a D.3 • 26 = 12` R-5.0 + 26.15 ' r=26 VCP S E =23:11 ~q #109 , 23.1 1246 25,2 5.91. .36.36 27:22. 27.61 . 8" ° , . 30.79 . , ; •.3t. D ' t 12" 14" ~ I 9,5D ~ R=2.5 + II 105 5.95 F , d o 32 113 4, 12S ~ 26.23 6 26.x7 6, . t . d 265 2 .76 - .2669. 4 • . . a . • .A• • : •.11. 291'7 ' 29.y7 1 ed ~ (14 11145 R-4,5 6610"2 R-45 11" 23.7 . ~ X91'7' ' 29.E 2964 .96. ~.30:06g:.'0• 'b0;51 ya~•~ ' .e'.: . . dm h t + #115 - - 01 5.8 14" #108 0#162 24, '•21.14 6. 2. 4 .Z6i94'. , X0-13 END =q~5 083382 04,15 R= .5 ~ 11.89, 1108 16.79 0R=4.5 21.0" 8--3.5 , ''''2504'. • ~ ~ ' 26. ~ • ' 6.19' '26.65'p '26.`82 _ ~ 0.68 • :61 3x08 : . o n • . 68 I 0 R=3, 721 'a: N 5" 7. 8 ^ - - 24.94 45 11` 02x pU°:.: M - - 675' (L) N i6" 8=20 ~7A R 25 g" SHED 9.91 3x13 3D.22 a ~ $ - 15" ~'86 26,23 = s R= ,2 • ~ M• 1116 r I an .a N :N ~ 4 E N W N w 0. ~ ~ " r•• R=5,0.98 .BS 16"' N :r ~5 ~ N oNO e I ~ 12' ~ 0#tq7 p .D ^ N 3 STORY STR TORE ,~M M M 4 ~ #117 3.OD11' x4 R=4D 125 i ~ , 'Ad. • ~A ~ • FINISHED FLOOR 30,68 d rn 265 _r~o #119 + ' ti , N • : 3 d ~ + 12 1• 4.0715• J / :1'. Q ~ Ota6t 1 STORY STRUCTURE „ ~ ACE ' a • L• Q 11231 3 120 ~ 12" _ N a r 29.98 ' ' 12 R=25 ~-4•~ I 41 FINISHED FLOOR - 28,73 • N M O N 118 ~ I ~4 • ~ L' 29, ~ 29.98 ' l' 29. i ` . 29.89 29.60 , c •a o M h Ri o ~ ~ ft=4.5 12 #1223• ~ 2 2' SHED °~~•0' 1 30.18 ° ' 9:74 ;r9. Oz 29.40,' W to ~ ° .o• H, 1123 R=20 ~ 11.6. ~ : ' 9:74 ;r9. o c~ O O + d N 27 8=1.5 ~ r 226 • ; : 4'5'6'17 2x,66 29.88 tl 3D.12 . - 2 29.6 GRATE INLET "d' 4) 4 ~ 1124 3.6 ~ 112.9 / 12 • • 8 o ~ R=3.5'82 + ~ " i • • 3 8.20 50' GE = 29A2 ~ s'. ~ I SW IE _ 25.86 o ~ ~ - ~ I- R=3.5/a8 12" 16.8 12" 024 .6 ®30.04 h o + ~3 5,R~1 3 R- • i~0 #It ~ 26.35 6" ~J30.04 ; ~ I•.. ~ x o 8=4.5 21.7 R=3•o ;~2 ' ~ 0 1&4 PLAYGROUND 0 o m 1027 185 1D. 8=5.0 ~ R=S,o g' 7 .o ~1-~ o ° I - 59.•4 268 0 5" .2623 ~ 26`n~. N T AREA ROUND atR ~ ' EA CONDI110NING ~ + M~ • ~ m m o ",H 0~ I / 8'6'~~~• ~13' ~ 20.97 192 12 N8 ~ . N 1.84 a 228 16. R~~, / ~ li2.61~ 5 R=2 22.5 151 ~ ' a UNIT (TYF) 'n 3.2 N T.9 2x7 29. O O O •0 11 ~ 18 ~1 R-1.5 n A. 282 6' CLF ~ 8=400 22.87 N }2-5,6 4r 0 4.2 I •-125.6 2x7 RCP 32f 29.93 30.0 ..30'•47 30.80 N , ' •p 3 ; 3D.22 JD•58 1 13 ~ . ~Cp 32.01 ' . RAMf3:. ®31.03 9.71 6 _ ~ h 11" ~~1P 12" 5'5'5"4'4" j 11'6" 2269 B 9' 23.14 f t2 Q h #79 0 .78 16.18 #73 g • - 54' 'act Z .r ' t -45 276177 17 3,7 P5 / ~R=1.5 13" 10` _ 158 r 4"r 6' ~ SHED u 2~- i R=0.5 - 9,73 R=5.0 ~ ~7 1120 ~ 155 ~ TBM NAIL ,IN POE 28'7 28' ON SHED ON ~ 9` ' . ~ °0 4 OLOSIER ~0 ® 0~9 Q~j4 I _~T ~2 1.5 ®R 20 ~5 8 1 a' E = 1 CONC 2 ~ _ ' lT~ 15" 13' 0~91''~ 2254 2 23.Q23.5B ® L ' 28.86 w + N fl 0228 R-3,A ~ 3Y 9,49,2 ~g R 1,~ _ 24.47 1x9" 1~ 13" IE = 25.28 251 CONC '1.5 o na:n ~ t d R-4.5 - R, .0 4 0229a13'r6'6'S' = R ,5° - ~ 153• ~I R 3,5 34713"1 .35049,9 1. 2 ~D 4_23,05 23.79 ~ ~ .=1~ 0 ~ 2&7-13" -8j3d76 N ° +K. 20." 1 STORY STRUCTURE ~ - RW - "R=TS- ~ 26.48 N ay \ ~ 13'® .OS 20" 0 - ~ - ~ '1••- + S.9 '""lt g=5.o.,~"~+15• 4 `$F5`4"4" ioa~23~18 24.99 2&0 O - 25 `cl~1x4P _ N N ~F262 2.96 ~30. _ 36 017.41 Ot 8 R-1 2302 25.37 +28.8 #70 ~ ~1Y ~ 18` r" tU ' R=25 8=1.5 t 1s' ~0, FINISHED FLOOR = 31.95 M,.:~ M ~:I NOTE: ' I TREE INVENTORY WITH NUMBERS AND RATINGS PREPARED BY cp W "i o® uv0i 28'4 29.64u6. t n N N 2&i N~ 9•D 2a:95 28.35 c~ ~ 1'" r"~- W O 2U ~ x0 ~ 19.6 R=1.0 27,1 m 29.78 ®29.6'~8~ ~ " 4 ~ U ~ t ~ 226 t2x52 ~ 27.3 28.65 ; 0.M M ®29.76 • " ~ " BOEN'S TREE SURVICE ~ ry, o ~ ~ 15.7 n o Q a, o a ~ m a 29,28 T• N + N 2x'26 < A/C = AIR CONDITIONER UNIT BACKFLOW PREVENTER rn W ~ y r, ~ c I I I 24 25.86: ' s n • ~ 28.0 :72 8.6fi 2 2985'•° ` 's ' 2 4988 ~ ~'A BLDG = BUILDING • =BOLLARD or POST ~ p o t~ g~~3 r N.~~ 22B-t q W o `C 4 m 120 f 4. 5 •15- A, ~ m C ~ rr544 8" " . . . ~2 x4 +29.1 , , 128.3 ' +~.3 - - - - l- _ - M....,,.,. M.°~ CSR - CALCULATED DATA ®=BOX, CABLE TELEVISION 2 0 1,92 • I Q ta; L~ ~ JD-9 13.1 5.~ 132 Y0.94~ ?268 2129 25.12 25.74 ~.025.Bfi i• 26. 4 0 0 .l- ~ 8=0.5 0 # - / s' ~ • ' ~ ~ • N ~ =CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD ®=BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY .T ~ , M . ~ CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE ~ =BOX, ELECTRIC U11LIlY (TRANSFORMER) U ~ o t ~ 23.82 R=3.5 , 24 '25.8. • : • 2 8ST . ~ . ~ - - ~ - - ~ 1p . .9 27,6 GRATE INLET CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ®=BOX, TELEPHONE i3 T 2 STORY STRUCTURE ~M I CONC = CONCRETE kt = DECORAI1VE LIGHT POLE p 0 - i J ' 123 13' ~ 23.85 13a a.. A > ~ ,4 GE =.28.31 m - I 1125 IPAR L FOUR R=4.5 R=N/A ~ < ~ •9 S IE = 26.15 ~ d . •6.15' FINISHED FLOOR = 31.21. ~ COR = CORNER ~ W h t d t R=25 a" ARV FOUR 15" 6 o r, n 1.6 3'S 03.91 I, ~ 1227 ~4~ •14 • 1 STORY STRUCTURE 25.9 ass4 2g.o4 15" s' ° ~ CPB = CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK ~w =FIRE HYDRANT 2 r s ~ At s; w ?5p' ~ ~ ~#12s f R= +23s 134 ' FINISHED FLOOR = 28.03 d 16.95 '2&116 ~ 29.04 C/T = CURB 11E FLAGPOLE lass ~ ( FLARED END SEC110N 29.04 a' D) = DEED DATA ® _ Q h U ~ .0 8--3,0 ttZB tY 2196 R,L$.' ~ M ~ ~ 28.95 0 5,6 95 21.47 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1A- 25.9 ' 28.95 k( ~ N N ' . DB = DEED BOOK ®=GRATE INLET Oj '4 ~ I I DJ N N N N. D.5 ~ '0 1 g ~®'o a N 1292 ~ 1s" , " ~.u DIP = DUCTILE IRON PIPE ~ =GROUND LIGHT 0 271 R-30 w~i N a ~ • ~ ti~ ~ " 1 0.7 M ECMP = ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE F =GUY ANCHOR JD-8 I ( ~ 24.5. 11" .il ~ • ~ 263 ; a ,~tO~.. • ~ ~ 7 a d I a : 29. 15'15" O t 13' 6 ~ •4~~ ~ v, 29.20 m 1.9 ~ ~ 12` {r44 1 '26.71: : . N N + 29.08 29,33 29 15,15, ~ ° 30. ~ El = ELEVATION ~ =LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE 2g.2o • '•'..3D:as EP =EDGE OF PAVEMENT =LIGHT POLE, METAL pgpg 29.33 srAlRS 3ff~21 •..._39.51.'~.,,'T- ~ ' ' ERCP =ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE ~ L1USIERS ~ 127 10"11 4.21 ~43 R=4.0 n iv ~ 29.0 . - _ _ a. ~ + 125 rr 21.2 = #28 ~ ~ _ g N ~ N 29.01 0 • 3o.D5_ - ' : ~ =LIGHT POLE, WOOD zs.o1 ~ ~ ~ s a o 3D:76 (F) =FIELD DATA ®=MAILBOX 2.96 3A - 7!1 #26 L R-N/A06.29 ~ II -.-~R= 0 N 29.11 ~ 0,2 N!- -•--f 16. ; .1 ° 29,44 N 2x•11 ~ N N FCM =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT 2x•64 MANHOLE, ELECTRIC - - - - - - ~1r I 244 5,fi5°. .13". il':°,•••12'. ~ ~ a Q4 ~ .434 11 I ~ 5 ~ a~• 14` ~ 03.52 12D 1 R=30~ ~ •..13: #35' M~.: g;• .I FDOT = FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA110N m •t4 " M FIR =FOUND IRON ROD ©=MANHOLE, GREASE TRAP O 0,5 4 O R=4.5 ~ ' f q0• ~-2 8=3.1' Ra,1;5°.R' :O.R=3, n • ~ ~ 4`5'6"6" h ~ ~ + t 29 • R.p.5.5 m, R 0.8 it 1R'e a .N 2 57 • • ' ~ 29.16 29 t 6=25 I 69 ` 21, 1 , • a , . ^N.. d. , . ;.,.,;i ' 2go3 4"5"~~ FND =FOUND NAIL & DISC U0 =MANHOLE, SANITARY SEWER 2871 <v #19• I R-35 16 1v° N N.;. a 25.6 t . N N Q 2,32 ~ 1 R= 0 1 STORY STRUCTURE 25J4® ~ ~ 19'2 N + ~ . ° FOP =FOUND OPEN PIPE ~ =MANHOLE, STORM SEWER 2sa N m ° ~ " ~ ~ " • FPP = FOUND PINCHED PIPE ©=MANHOLE, TELEPHONE 2so ' a p'„ + FRRS = FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE M o a 1 I -3.0 t R=3. ~ 29.0 ~ 1.91 23 f FINISHED FLOOR = 26.40 2942 5 ~ 26.4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; m . m ®=METER, ELECTRIC kr kr N JD- =5.0 7.8 I . c> c~ M ~ 26.75 M ~ I N h 252 N 1O • ~ " Du PA TER e!t, : ; ~ . , F/T = FENCE 11E ®=METER, GAS ae R O 5` 5'4'4r ~ 21J ~ ~c ~ 1~ ~ 24.6 B.. ,.AI„ ~ d ' +29,2 ' 26.76. 29.05 °A' ' a rn o 8=5.0 p,25 6'g'g' 15 x 06 y~ 12`22"28' 'd.• 1 N POLE' N 7 . o w O q ® 11. 23, 2° ~ 29,24 ~ 28,i Lls 2s.o5 ° ' ~ PARCEL. OI~E.. ~ ~ N M' ~ FXC = FOUND X-CUT ....W .N~... . • " lv~, ®=METER, WATER m 259 O 03,92 6°1;x4" 5.20 121 ~ 1127 I 11 -10.96 X15 #14 2D,96 25.56 =35 R=1.5 = ~_5 15 4"5 fi 8' R=1.0 R=3.5 11270 R=1,5 6' . 4 ~ 28.75 a oo M ~ 4• GE = GRATE ELEVATION ®=METER, RECLAIMED WATER Lfi5 26.67 m ~q ~ ~ ' IE = INVERT ELEVAl10N ®=MITERED END SECTION GRATE 1NLEr. ^ " „ gl - (L) =LEGAL DESCRIP110N DATA `.r ~ 750' (L) 3~ Z6 4~ 'R=3.5 21.9 13 25.53 112 29.34 OHL T d ~ .65 26.67~ATE IN _ N GE = 28 - - mo mo c 10-6 87 9,37 1 " .60 21,9 24.27 25. W lE = 2 '~4' MONITORING WELL cE = 20.0.7. " ~ " M";0. • LB = LICENSED BUSINESS Q = + 2.79 2.35 3.65 3.43 ~ 24 14` _4015.87 ~ I 15" RCP . c + J ` ,p..4 .852 16 11.6611~~ N ~ IE = 25,29 5" i5" RCPw IE = 25.98 ~ ^ ~ 1r~ : M LS = LICENSED SURVEYOR ® =PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGNAL . " N <; MAS = MASONRY ® =SANITARY CLEANOUT 0 0 ~ p 134 ~ + #128 R=3• N I 25.8 GRATE INLET , ci p 3.8 I R 35 ~ 25" 24.4 25.30 / 26.0 GE = 8,26 : • 10' MHW = MEAN HIGH WATER ~ =SCHEDULE B-2 ITEM r + I 5.01 t ~ N IE 25.79. 2&76 . 28.57 2g'~ .P 4.0 6,4 ~B•E g4' 21.7 124.5 1 STORY N , 2x1 25,9 E IE = 25,7a '21 2,6s ~,5t x•45 g STRUCTURE 2a76 . 28.57 29'09 11" ~ " M NP =NORMAL POOL ~ =TELEPHONE RISER ,D-3 ~ H`6.3 ~ 18.23®1x79 .5"5' WIE 25;76 .a#1 26.74'.. ~ 2x1 4` ^a ro t 2&83 28:99 ST ~ ~ + FINISHED ~ , JQ I 19,2 13.7 ...°R=2,D. • c`y 0 . N N 29.1 28.81 • sl 26,55 ~ ~ ~ Q ~d189 - N 0/A = OVERALL -a- =TRAFFIC SIGN 2sss ~ N . M ~ a M " OR =OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK ®=TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX ~ <3 F OOR = 30. 2x1 ^ #o ~ ~ ' 9" N N a ~ ~j o o ^ 29,98 a • N ~ (P) = PLAT DATA ®=TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE PB PLAT 8 UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION MARKER u N N ~ ~ ~ _ OOK - ARNING SIGN ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ h0 ~ 2 .1 29.07 N 23.4 R=3 n M t 29 3,01 • t ~ O N N N 28.58 30 4.D x6 ~ • M PG PAGE - 6.8 .1248 ~7 8, ; • °4 2 .k . • :29.18 • .2292 • • • a PLS = PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ®=UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION W POB =POINT OF BEGINNING ~E( =UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MARKER ' : , 28.5 " • S'GAIRS 29.31 ' t 23.5 y • POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ®=UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WARNING SIGN 16,8 j r ' 11 ' . T R ~ ~ I 10" 2s. ~ a STRUCTURE P CEL. TW CEL ~0 2sos 2s:62M M PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT ~ =UNDERGROUND FIBER OP11C MARKER G g ~ `v ~ 3.36 ~ PSM =PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER ®=UNDERGROUND FIBER OP11C WARNING SIGN ~ 23.5 12 N FINISHED o l " ~ ~ a P/T.= PAVEMENT TIE ~ =UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN MARKER 03.47 44 ~ P17.~ " I PVC = POLY VINYL CHLORIDE ®=UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN WARNING SIGN ' 05.61 x + . n 291 4`10` ~ 26.4 26.59 N ~ HL ~ . 1 9;32 29.56 29.78 I RCP = REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE =UNDERGROUND GAS MARKER NITtiRY ANHOL RLS = REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR ~"1 12' ~ 13` +23.4 1&~5 26,61 N N 106 3.07 3.65 " 12'24"14' 6'1 '~11.1~5 17.30 ~ ® ' • 25,93 . ' ~ 29.23. 1.41 31.4 N s9 30.07 30.3 al R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY ®=UNDERGROUND GAS WARNING SIGN ' " 1.41 31.4 • 2 2966 31 1 J131 ~ 31.38 > RM EL = 17$ M =UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER MARKER 0.92 JD L1 3,p 6' 6 / I ® 19.57 / 23.05 25.87 , .38 1.39 . 26 27. 28:40 2928 30.63. 30.91. - SEC SEC110N Ja91 ~ G 3076 , al 13s is T. s iE 2s 0.i a ~ ~ ®=UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER WARNING SIGN ~ . SHW - SEASONAL HIGH WATER 630.00' 4.40 .41 449 5}~° ©5.14 4.21 4.67 ~ 747.20.37 ~ 26, r 26.0(1 S t 5.98.... • 27.30 ,.A v ,8" VCP w 28.18 0.89 7-5" 15` 26" ,~6.~ 23 28:69. , ~ a • iJ'~31z ~ ~ s ~ SIR =SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB 6113 =UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER MARKER . ' '30.23 „ ~ - - ~ 4~3" ~ M SND = SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113 ®=UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER WARNING SIGN - - •kU~- - 2 2420 25,94 .5i8 282.41' L -~5 - ~ ~ X25.63 • y1: ~ °i 30:70 O ~ 24,37 25.9 58 ~ ry' OHL a o :30.62 • 3D.62 3010.3093.043 M ° 03~~~g ~ M d,. SR = STALE ROAD =UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE MARKER N ~ ~ 22.98 ~ 9~. ~C,~ 10" . '.•a~M 30.68 30.6 rr) 1 2r , g 25:9 SANITARY MANHOLE d o ~ 30'63 1•ss 3os - - - - _JO•sl ~ S/T = SIDEWALK 11E ®=UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WARNING SIGN 30;63 ~ 30.51 31:02 31,35 0 ~6.4 2229 24.53 16" PARC L .THR ' 25.8 a RIM EL = 26,33 C 29. ' • • MM 13,1 , ® ti°'; ' • 2 (j~L N IE = 22,87 a°. cR~t~ INL~r M I ~ S1Y = STORY =UNDERGROUND WATER MARKER GE = 3026 26.12 25, 3D.44 12" VC a 2612 ® ~ t S IE = 22,89 Q66 12° vG 1E = 26.30.: J1.27 ~ 1BM = TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ®=UNDERGROUND WATER WARNING SIGN IE = 2a:35 cp, =UTILITY POLE, CONCRETE a ' S,6 • ' • ~ 2.4 ~ SW IE = 23,05 ('RATE INLET N I ~ 25,17 WIE = 23.03 GE,= 30,26. 2p.23 *,j j5 5,73 t 6`61~DT8'8 E IE = 27.91 $ 30. , o M (TYP) =TYPICAL ~ =UTILITY POLE, METAL 30. 3152 31,3s • ~ I VCP =VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE ~ =UTILITY POLE, WOOD o ~ +5.6 ~ ` ~h1 6~ , 6`' ~ 25.81 0 S IE = 27:88 ~ - -4- - - o I I? !Lh.. 5,13 M n D;51 No ~ r 7~ +14.0 SANITARY MANHOLE GCp n ~ o X18 203 31.33 • N~ = W OD FENCE GvCoa =VALVE, GAS ~ a 3206 - ° W/T = WALL 11E Rv Coa -VALVE, RECLAIMED WATER - t - -,3. - - - ~ PARCEL FOU 3D:56 ~ ~ M - 4+7 - t4 -RIMS 25:82- u~ i`3~ n 11 O ~^y o +.0 ~ / • 42` NE IE = 23.03 ~ N M Q...: , . sv c~a =VALVE, SANITARY # = TREE NUMBER • 1"152 18.98 S IE = 22.85 tY 11` 'S M 180,73® SW IE = 23.54 0 J " ~ ~ R = 1REE RAl1NG wv~a =VALVE, WATER M 31.35 ®31.62 . e., a ®=WELL NW IE = 239 ~ ~A:~ ' 26 ` n: 31'•. 7.22 10" -~l0 121 / 26.4a ary. % ®27.31 31.3 31,3 ~ ~ : + 25.25 =POINT OF ELEVATION to'13" 17.06 ® ' ~ . • o m ~ 30. 630.00' 4.69 @Q5.D6 g S~B7 I > N ~ • • 28,1 ~ - ~ ~ ~ 31.16 • b + M M 3t.1s ~ 25.2' =DIMENSION FROM BUILDING TO 7.20 a *0.516,~4 • 'n. ' p d - BOUNDARY /RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 4;ts ,y" ts" 1 STORY ~ °o Las • 1x13' 10` 2r 14" . q ~ 3 136 ~ / 22,09• 19.11 28.30 2s.15 N ~ N 26.66 26.72 STRUCTURE / V• a ~ 6+ N ~ 52 :.,73 INISHED FLOOR ~ 2x2 2a 3D.5 N 3121 3121 STORM CURB INLETS 4:•'•::•0. =CONCRETE ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ Q 0 =ASPHALT ' 8 STORY BUILDING 8.86 12,16 25.55 26.01 = 2 1 1.37 o, ~ AC ~ SANITARY MANHO a~ N 3D,64t 1.37 =CONCRETE PAVERS ®11.®9.86 14.68 / RIM EL = 25.78 W tO N 30.84 31.27 N IE = 22,98 ~ ~ • ' ~ WO D ~ 12x2 ,'31.27 BRICK IE = 0.95 ~ ~ / S IE = 22,97 SH D -1.31 ~t.31 1 STORY STRUCTURE - =TOP OF BANK ZONE VE ~ ,317 ~ WIE = 24.02 ' 7"7•x4" 8 CLAY CA A 934 ~ 25.43 25.7 30.6 31.21 31.21 -FINLSHED-F~DOR--- 3~-SO . M ~ =TOE OF SLOPE or CENTER LINE OF DITCH I ~ ~ I /I p ~ o m ~ . = 6" CHAIN LINK FENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED I ~ ~(~1 L (EI 15) Q 25.3. , 28.11 28,9 ® YARD INLET / 1,31 131 M + „ . =OVERHEAD U1LITY LINES ' YE = 8.44 4.06 4•D9 t + ~ ZONE X - -6 - - -G- - =APPROXIMATE LOCAITON OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE 31.21 - -W - - ~ - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER LINE + shaded ' o 127.0 ~ 31.21 3,6 4,6 g,g 8.6 10,3 / , „ t 1y, 3D:ss ~ 1 - f - - -f- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN ' I 12' 2Z8 3"3"5"6' ~ 1. 25.26 25. 8A15 30.6fi I UJ 25,3 026,56 2 29.4 e ° ~ - -R - - -R- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE J ~Iz IW F~'J 2539. 25. Jo`• 2 X0.74 4 ° ` - - ~z"--Pil£- _ =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE ~ t/ 30 15 0 30 w.z eW ' ~ + t2a,1 3DS 3k 1°' . . ~ ~Z ZONE X 4.'< 18' 26.7 14 29 GRATEINI:ET: ~,.4 . 3k t'' . I o - 24-R6fl-- =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER LINE . ~ 4 , Q k O ((~j27.92 GE _ 30.29 ? A gjW ZONE VE ~ O~iy STORM MANHOLE 14• N IE = 27.79 I'C ' 179; p`C 1.3 • .179: ~ . ~ • . 7 PROJECT: NnV O k p ~ ' v . s8 016.4411M EL = 26,16 00 ~ SE IE = 27.79 1.3 29.7 „ , O N (EI 14) ~ a .q CATCH B 1N d ~ ~ N IE = 19.34 2 29.2 ~°29,0 ` 29.3 31.75 OSCEOLA AVENUE 2 ~7•~6• 31.6 SCALE:1 =30 ~ ~ 0 _ ~ .'N ~ E IE = it 66" RCP I 30.94 A a~q '¢JO RIM. EL - 25,40 •c6 ~ ° .as ( ) .T R O J S IE.='19,49 ~ N ~ ~ E IE = 9.88 (42" RCP) 24 14" 3676 29. 30.94 29. •T~27.8 ' ' ?7.1 - - -h28'3 - ~ - 29.4 3Q76' 0.62 27.+ IE - 27.69 +27.5 = +2 + ~$t.s . TYPE OF SURVEY: r /+I ~e~ A~~~ ~ 'Q•O j 'W + N WIE = 8.52 ~j2x41 ®28.0 1g 30.7 30'7 .0.62 27.1 ~ li ZONE AE ~ . n • +27,0 3D74 ' 21 x9 27.2 0., ~ ~ a`•:, 25.80 v`1445 ' .:30:66 N .80 27.2 ~ (EI 12) .25.23.25.33 ~ 6" I 3D;88:31.6 ~ 0 2g, , ' 0.g ~•2 4 ~ _ s ~ ~ ° ~ BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CITY ~ A...L iru` .80 26.2 X28.33 29. 27.2 "~L8.1- - - - t?4-nti ~ 31,3 . m . m ' . ,o ~ 25,31 }25,56: 28 ({126.92 ~ ~ ~1.Da ~ ~ STORM MANHOLE Oh 25,29 'i6 29.3 JO.DO 30.24 ~ p 16 30.2 ~ ~ 0 2.3 ®18.59 2a5 31.1 ~ ~ ,a AO ~ ~ ~ 31 1 + " PREPARED FOR:TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC iv ~ 1 RIM EL = 25.03 24.34 ~ ~y,35 ~4 c• 2 ~ 25.71 25, B6 191 JD,79 L ~ D yf'L'll N N l E IE =8.80 OH 27.86 ~ 29.65 1 S IE = 19.21 ~ 2Zi3 30.52 31,04. l~ M :98' • ~ ~ WIE = 8.79 ~4~5 . 5.1 ;1 . . : '.:66, 24.7. 4. 6 : C~E'~•' CONFIJCT 80~f W/ 3D.18 STORM MANHOLE 66"'RCP 3Di82 ' ~ ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT v. BOK STORM MANHOLE IM' = 29'.08 SANITARY MANHOLE RIM EL = 30.23 pQLAR1S AA rA A~rr v ~ I i ~ RIM''EL:= 26.34 $ IE~ 24.13 129.84 • ~ i + E IE G 23.3D 127.56 128,44 -F2x62 . WIE = 24.05 129.23 29.84 RIM EL 30.5530.52 E IE ~ 11.84 , ~~f 31.06+ MSJOI~~/'i~J ~IYII. FlLLEO W/ DIRT + Q o W IE = 11.68 0 +30:87 RECLNMED WATER ~ ~ 31.09 ~ I ~sa~ tr( 125:69. nSW IE - 23.27 ro ' ITARY MANHOL CP _.!!t ILK $ vcp PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING LB 6113 o•56 RIM EL c 2546... 27.25 29:18 294 29 86 a X24 23gp (1)26.18 21176. $ 1 23. 24.08 . N N IE = 22:41 2&32 2986 t317 30.66 .30.B97- 6 .095#, f v850 U.S. HIGHWAY 19 NORTH, SUITE 500 -L 9ci 1 SANITARY MANHOLE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33764 < 1 824,52 )r,( 7561 g 7,27' a.:. 2730'. n 29.t .2963. 99.8 ` 24.3 E IE = 22.38 229.72 N _ a m 'JG- 7.43 29.86 1 HIM LL 1 30,26 - - = 30742 to 3126 30.81 / 4.9 a 3 fE = 22 30,26 ~J' o v OLLEO 'WITH' WATER' 12" PVC 29.97 o > G 30.17 30.40 TO MEASUR 30.40 09/16/05 2 REVISE ADDITIONAL SEAWALL & TOPO (727) 524-6500 3 N BLE Q o 30.62 3031 CATCH BASIN --,,,,.r p' SIZES a 27,64 09/16/1 m 6 ry CATCH BASIN c. 30.79 30;76 30;76 N RIM EL = 25.79 RIM EL - 25.66 m N IE - 20.55 ty a 08/04/ E IE = 21,59 RCP " NE IE = 23.31 08/04/05 1 REVISE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS, ADD PARCEL 5, REVIEW TITLE POLICIES CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB NO. DRAWING PATH: SHEET 2 S IE = 20.54 SE IE = 36 W IE = 23.113 DATE .16 IM DATE NUMBER REVISIONS BY JOD 1" =30GRM/MEP 02-3324 H: \JN\3324\dwg\3324topo2REV4.dwg 3 OF 3 x 1i; • _ ii ` Y 1 i O ~ . m ~ v~ ~ ~ rn ~ ~ -°~~n~ - ° ~ 3 a~= ~ N cam . Y U y ~ ~ 3 . } c3o~~-Oo - _ ate= c.c N N t ~ ~ ' to O W U ~ O ~ N w ~ O O Q ~ ao N ~ ~ ~ _ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~°+'o ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ E E -m}.~,a~ . ~ _ ~ ~ a~ o ~.Ec~vi ~oa.o~ ~ r a L.- o N--, C ~ ~ ~ L O N N U "O C O N 3 u~U-Ew ~ U_ C ~ = ~ - ~ - ~ -t 0- C ~ N ~ N• O O D N m U V U ~ ~ O ~ 3 U (0 i ~~.co=E E ~ 0 N O c U cp ~ N N H E ~ ~ Z y ~ ~t apt ~ . a vi ~m 4 - ~ • m arm ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ E o~cLa~•~o.. c~3fl.Q~ _ ; ~t rn U~-' c ~ ~ y ` C •U N ~ C (C ~ 'L N rp - E O" -C N ~ ~ ~ O H N (6 W :t' w ' ~ i , 3 _ . AZOI , . _ _ _ u^ , , - mrt " - ~ r rn rn , lus ~ Zo - _ atom A~~ PRDXIM M ' nn NN nn I . , i ~ _ _ m , a . . . i x i i~ ~ ~ (nom • a ~ 'Ar' m O r._...,... L.i lL f o ¦ W m ~ t- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ;6 o I i 1 ; i. ~ - 7 0 ~ y ' • ~ ' -r . _ , _ , 3 I I I ~ _ L Q NU i~. W ; i I I ° _ i x201 I 35 YARD I I - ' „i TRASH I I tD ~ o I I., I, M d. ¦ N O Z I!) O m N I COMPACTOR !I I a _ _ - , , 1 a ~ ~ ~ . ~ , _ I _ - , _ _ m - _ _ n O W N n~ T 0 35 =B" I ~ an ~ 3SfOT2 W ~ Q XX t 0 ~ trl ~ ~ - r Q N ~ ~ ,r ~ N V 5 ' ' _ N ~ a . ~ ~ ~ 0 - - - - _ '9 Ap o. ~ ~ _ _ N ' . ~ D+f . _ _ _ _ 11,9 TF , c~ a r~ '2y O _ ~a - . ~ 1GS 2 - .2 ' ! , C LL O ~ O, E Z ~ ~D m ' ' 0 .r tnc ,i STt1DY AREA ~ . OCaoYr`Aht-G~amDesi9oAsw6ales,PA Atlrighfireserved. Thismalereiis6iee~harvepiaperty : of Graham Deagn Assadates, PA - I Reprodictim(nrtioieainpansts sfm~y Drot~he~i w~tout the piarwiuen perrt~ssimdGrahamDesgnAssodates, PAad anywdirepobx6onmay sibjedyaumaetandkramm~ fly umkrT~e 17 d 1heUMed 5ta~s Code. SCALE: 1l8" =1•-0° SCALE: 118" =1'-0" n M Q i ~J L Q J LL Q~ _ _ W CORRIDOR UNIT D 0 H Q rn V, Q i W 5T-8" J - RD FL00 H V ' ~ a J W U ro UNIT G CORRIDOR a 0 ~.I o~ l~J I' M ^ Z L.L ~ 0 4r-o" _ r,~..t:. - - "•y' 2ND LEVEL Q ~ ~ F., I N TRASH LL 2 o ~ o ~ -1 ~ ' i 0. N ~ ~ ~ Z I /'-vin i r ~ ui 3 YARD TRA V I COMPACTOR I 3l'-0" 1 1ST LEVEL I Y U m PARTIAL" BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 118" =1'-0" i GREGG HOLDSWORTH LICENSE NO. AR ORIGINAL 0017669 RECEIVED NOV 2 3 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT co z CITY OF CLEARWATER S I w THOMASJ. GRAHAM i LICENSE NO. AA 0000752 05-42 w A201 a o gin LDATE DRAWN CHECI~D O z ,W5 M AW'IJDS TJG iir Q ~ d i C ~L ~ I am~~ o•~ 3 y~ c'~t C ~ Y U N i ~3 .r N C Ct ~ N l0 LO N N C N V ~ m8a;~ ~ °~i ~ o c•o~~>, d C L N cv$~8 O w O - t ~ N ~ U ' C ~ ~ ~ N _ N N ~ d CG ~ ~ v N C O ~ O ~ O N w+ C 41 f~ .3 p N I ~ . d1 C ~ > ~ C .cam 3 ~ ~ 8= ~s c ~ :P~~~B o~°3c c~ -c~ca~ ~c~;o`FF° L C C a$NR~ ~ov~$c 8~E y 3 I ~ N ~•oL A-210 Za~~a3. C N I ~ ~ C C N Of ~ C ~ C ;I LIGNNING PROtCTION ~ ~ 3 a a ~Q,oEa~ ~~YTM r ~ m SSE. f zN8 1 CONCRETE BARREL m N o ` ~ ~I 1 I A-252 TILED ROOF, TYP. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 CONCRETE BARREL tILED ~ ~ d ~ w ~ ROOF ~I I k t LIGHT WEIGHT PRECASt ,.x 'I t ~ '~7; I ~ ~~a BRACKETS, TYP. 8 ~ I ,y n I ,w.~, • A_ aou~ 210 RAISED STUCCO TRIM BAND, TYP: ~ I I I LIfsNT UJEICsI~T PRECAST LIGHT WEICsNT PRECAST ~ MEDALION TYP. ~ I I MEDALION, TYP. II ~ • ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ IGNT WEIGHT PRECAST ' ~ tRIM BAND, TYP. I ALUMINUM TRELLIS A UMINUM T L~ fS I L RE L LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST .I WINDOW PEDIMENT, TYP. e I e m~ LIGNt WEIGNt PRECAST ~ ti PRECAST DECORATIVE PRECAST DECORATNE WINDOW PEDIMENT, TYP. ~ M PIECE ~7 PIECE ~ RAISED STUCCO LICsNt WEIGHT PRECAST LIGI~T WEIGI~T PRECAST TRIM ~y ~o LL 0° ~ I w m TRIM BAND, TYP. TRIM BAND, TYP. 0 0 0 0 0 BAND, TYP. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ LIGHT WEICsNt PRI=GASt I 1 ~ U T ` ~ Nv 1 ALUMINUM CASEMENT WINDOW PEDIMENT, TYP. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 o e o 0 5/8" PORTLAND CEMENT. WINDOWS, TYP. STUCCO OVER S" CMU, TYP. A-251 i ~ ¦ PRECAST SELL TYP. ~ a . ~ ALUMINUM TRELLIS WINDOWS. ~ c~ z -d 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ALUMINUM TRELLIS 7 o a o 0 0 0 _ N I i A-210 g LUMINUM tRELLIS ~ y W vv LICz~4T WEIGHT PRECAST TRIM 9 ~ p - i- ~ AND TY . A-210 B P A-210 , Q u. LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I o 0 0 0 0 0 COLUMNS, TYP. Q Q v 1 _ m Q 1 1 ~ N 1I/ ~ e ~ ~ LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST I o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I IGHt W IGHt ECA t Q I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 © o L E PR S y TRIM. BAND, 7YP. 1 I TRIM BAhID, TYP. Q ~ ~a ` f~ mA ' 1 1 ALUMINUM E FABRIC V 11NUM E FABRIC ~ I ~a ~I V) ~ 42" STEEL GUARDRAILS 6 I I I I WINDOW AWNING, TY BALLUSTERS o a o 0 0 0 0 0 h OW AWNING, TYP. 2" STEELI GUARDRAILS t ~ O p~ 0 , 0 0 0 p O ~ BALLUST~RS ~ ~ ~ - I I L ~o' 5/8" PORTLAND CEMENT 'i 1 I.. STUCCO OVER 8 CMU, TYP. I I OCAP7dB~•Gief~em DeelgnAsaodatea, PA i I Wdphbreaerved. I I ~ Thm mala~ ~ Na ezduaNe piopsriy I _ of Oreham ~a(pn Asaadalsa, PA. I o© o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c . i ~ Repiodu~6aiinwhdearnpede~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 etrldlyprohih~adwitlautthepdaw~tmn 1 I ~ pe~misdanaf0~ahamDe~gnAssacJaffa, PA endam~a~ch ~epmduetlanmey ~I I I aubjedyoutodvlerdlaraimirelBablllry • ' trnstor719a17dtliaUnl~dSfabeCade. o 0 o e e o 0 0 o I o 0 0 o I o 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 I 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 p 0 ~ PREF~ PREFABRICATED A-210 COPPI ~~~~d COPPER ROOF, TYP. 4 ~ o 0 o I o t o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o 0 o a o o t o ~ o 5/S" PORTLAND CEMENT ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A-210 0 0 © Q 0 n _ ~'~:f~- h Srucco w~R s cMU, tYP. - 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ I I 1 I I ~ METAL LOUvERS ~ o LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST 0 o I ~ ° TRIM BAND, TYP.. p I i I ~ ~ I I I 0 ® LL I 0 0 0 O ~ MET L GATE i i w i i i i ~ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~I I P a I Iii----J I ~----J ® ® ~ ~ i ~ I I 4J 4W.r -in 4'~i -5+ W-4ii +r~' > i ? .4 h "i x~ i44+ w rt 4LJr+Y ,~2YTr4+Y, Y, ~y, XF WY9 .J iwi 4~9hh... k:'v FM 1{MF ~,_vl- 41.j. ~1 ~ 4mi+`i e e 1 ~"44-~'Iw.uY.~ ~ f y ' IL~~";~"'i v+ 4,. _ '?=k`> a.'~,.,iTM+. i Tmx n-r rx~, 4"`~ N - ;~i°;w Wf°k+i'',;3; ti.-'r`te'.. ~L+ .l]-+'+,-n .4. k -w s--..t ~ ' _ '...u~.e?-~, v-tSucT: ",:'C I I ;^k~;4n~Y? iar.c.v~iU: Krt~ ~-ihti' q°r"; i~ ~,a u: ~kiHr `a.-t~k-`;nar.-m2,*sr'wG stir 7-7 ~.-eT ~d=lrvkti..yt tia.: i ~ J ~ 1 °x+`..~+-' ~'L,Y' ::a vsr-vux'~s. ~Y~ d~tiG..Fs~f!.+rr :r ,~%.{~i ^r~S~ - I ' rTr ~,ti 77~t~ r'P- ~,~""~w, - µ'Sti nv~1q'3~. r'S*3^a:Ayi. ~r,E~.-+,'.M .!....A'-Gi[ C.~liii.'NYNrN..l LaV!Afi.MlaiL'.: JY" Nr±1uu-t. w.i ~a y ,ynw. O LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST - g LIGHTW LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST MEDALION TYP. LIGNt WEIGHT PRECAST 0 RAISED STUCCO w LIG~IT WEIGHT PRECAST I COLUMN 2 COLUMNS, .TYP. TRIM BAND, TYP. COLUMNS, TYP. ~ V RAISED STUCCO S MEDALION TYP. 1 A-210 ~ LIGHT W TRIM BANp, TYP. A-210 IS STUCCO A-210 CAP, TY LIGHT WEIGHT ECAST RAISED STUCCO PR YE SE Ff E SHUTTER ~ O RE R R } RA ED CAP, TYP. BEYOND METAL GATES TRIM BAND, TYP. LIGHT WEIGHT PRECAST ~ Z TRIM BAND, TYP. - „ 8.4 Hk '•4" Nf N 0 -U CAP, TYP. 0 8 G R LL P -l N DOORS DOORS BEYOND ~ ~ r b i, { . ~ _ _ I a~ 0 - I Z i i , i I ti i j i i GREGG HOLDSWORTH LICENSE NO. AR 0017669 ORIGINAL RECEIVED i NOV 2 . 3 2005 y Z 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT N CITY OF CLEARWATER f j THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000752 1 I 742 EAST ELEVATION A I I ~ 0 2. 0 0 i i DATE DRAWN CHECKED O Z 11108165 MAWIJDS TJO •i {