Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2005-04034
• 05 C?'u • FLD2005-04034 400 JONES ST Date Received: 04/28/2005 HARRISON VILLAGE ISLAND VIEW ZONING DISTRICT: D LAND USE: CBD ATLAS PAGE: 277B PLANNER OF RECORD: MTP s` AWING D"PAWMEKI r C IV a CLWCoverSheet V 0 Keith Zavac & Associates Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning June 15, 2005 Ms. Jeanne Talhouk Progress Energy 2166 Palmetto Street, Blvd. F Clearwater, FL 33765 RE: HARRISON VILLAGE/ISLAND VIEW Dear Ms. Talhouk: 0 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith (a.keithzayac. corn JUN 1 i; 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SVCS CITY-Q Ct.I. F UVII a!E--FL _,_,, Enclosed please find one copy of the proposed site plan and survey of the existing property for the above referenced project. Also enclosed is a copy of Attachment A that identifies several easements, an alley, and rights of way proposed to be vacated as part of this project. After review of the enclosed information, we would request that you provide a letter of no objection for this proposed vacation request. Please contact me directly should you require any further information to provide the requested letter. Sincerely, Z"- ? Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA President Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Enclosures (2) ?. 1e T OEVELOPMEPk3 COMPAh„ LLC THOMAS COATES, DIRECTOR, DESIGN & PLANNING thomas@triangledev.com 714 N. Ft. Harrison, Clearwater; FL 33755 727446.0020 • 727.446.7531 (fax) • 727.504.7311 (cell) %bh6. 0 0 ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTIONS OF PROPERTY T^v nE VACATED HARRISON VILLAGE/ISLAND VIEW 1. Drainage and utility easement retained over vacated alley described in O.R. 7270-1731. 2. Drainage and utility easement retained over vacated alley described in O.R. 7546-607. 3. Drainage and utility easement retained over vacated alley described in O.R. 7519-329. 4. Ingress-egress easement described in O.R. 7540-275 5. Remaining east-west alley portion not vacated to west of vacated alley portion described in O.R. 7546-607,608. 6. Vacate that portion of Osceola Avenue that is located between the north right- of-way line of Jones Street and the proposed emergency access roadway shown on the site plan. t ,JUN 15 2005 11:04RM Jun 15 05 12:08p HP LRSERJET 3200 Tr&1e Development 727 44002 p.2 Keith Zzyme & Associates, limc. 701 Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Civil Engieeeri Land ng, -Fe Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith eitl?a ac.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mark Parry FROM: KOM E. Zayac, P.E., RLA PATE: June 15, 2005 RE: Harrison Village FLO 200544434 In response to your email we are forwarding the fblowing inbrrnation: 1. Attached is a copy of the vacation request filing form, application The and rogquired attachments. The original is being sent via overnight and will bo forwarded upon receipt. 2. The situ plan has boon revised to delete the mid-block cross walks due to safety concerns, therefore additional signage will not be required. 3. The site plan has been revised to show the VV840 pathway at Me drop off areas. p.2 Jun 15 05 12:00P Triangle Development. 727 44S 0002 6. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS: A. Land Survey of Property B. Plot Plan Showing Proposed Use of Vacated Property C. Filing Fee Per Ordinance No. 5969-96. ($500.00 for a Right-of-Way/alley or $400.00 for an Easement) 7. THE FOLLOWING FIVE LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION ARE REQUIRED: A. Progress Energy B. Verizon Florida, Inc. C. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. D. Bright House $- NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER (PLEASE PRINT) Name; '' Q - G ih44*:?? Phone• 727-44l _OUZO ? LAG Address: f 44W *X-1 AJ9 Gl.G4?Yt/ r .FV ? 9. OWNERS SIGNATURE NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF PINELLAS) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5- b y? who is personally known to me or who has produced La as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. Notary Public, Commission No. k (Name of Notary typed, printed or stamped) p.4 .JUDY TROXEL FILE %-;:tZ1WQVESl FILING FORKENC h10TARY PUBLIC OF COLORADO =jtM tie bcd a/16J2op5 - MY MMUISO_ EMPIRES 21710 b-d 0026 13CN3SU1 dH ww9osii SOOZ ST NnC ,JUN 15 2005 11:04AM HP LRSERJET 3200 Jun 15 05.12:08p Tr*91e Development 727 44]002 P-3 CITY OF CLEARWATER - ENGINEERING SERVICES 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE - ROOM 220 PORNf NUMBER P.O. BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FL. 33758-4748 1311-0104 PH. (727) 562-4750, FAX (721) 5624755 VACATION REQUEST FILING FORM 1. NAME OF APPLICANT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: p.3 Name-:rh 6'.VA ;F- Phone: -7Z7-4.4& v to 7- -& D Address• ?!4 1?. 1'f??{6JOI.? L? ? $3'7?? HEREBYPETITIONS THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CLEAR WATER FOR THE VACATION OF THEFOLL0W1IVG. EASEMENT TYPE:-WA 1 5g STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ALLEY OTHER 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED (NOTE: If it is a portion of an easement, describe which portion, if it is an alley, describe from ikhere to where or what lot(s) it abuts, if it is a Right-of-Wa , describe how inuch is proposed to be vacated.): -Wv- AT - ??rs?> '&"; - 3. STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION: WAS' SrOV- 0e 41- *?-- t+AY??? 80TV MM l jotW!-., ST' $l00r41A 4t' 4. PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY: h l)(157 7 C i FOLM-61 t - 5. ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY: North -]2_ South East West FILE VACATION REQUESTPILING FORM.ENG w i.? himai at rcgti+Cn j'qm Page.] Rcviccd II/1R/2tI1i I I I r LEGEND (TYP,) TYPICAL PROJECT BOUNDARY OVERHANG/FLOOR ABOVE EXISTING TREE CANOPY TO REMAIN X EXSTING TREE TO BE REMOVED © INTERIOR OPEN SPACE CONCRETE SURFACE WOOD DECK / WALK - ASPHALT SURFACE BUILDING FOOTPRINT INTERIOR CONC. SIDEWALKS ? J i • ^ I I 1 I / -24 LOADING AREA I I EMERGENCY ACCESS ROADWAY 42) 1 "I" SONT . W/ -iFUEEO GRASS VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (TYP.) ` ,GORA.E SAW CUT & MATCH EXISrNC PAVEM T R 9 - - - /1 ??=-- -- x R END N NRE ------- EN . CU B. & GRADES (TYR,), (1) R- 'STOP SON' °1 (1)2,'STOP BAR / I X I ' I r x O P M RK Z O OWS 1[VERTICAL ? fLEARAx[F BELOW ORTE-COCHERES / x// X I X N Pfi 4 ( GOING I \? $ I j r x A. srwnav PAD I ' x x _- -- / x 1 t-1 ?? i1 - / E I / 1 4 / q6. I e W GRAPHIC SCALE I l x w' i ?1 IA I e x X 1'¢ -0 x Ry 1 x u m z xx- x x1 fix, x x/ ` 1 aB R, I I x , . X X W ( IN FEES ) I ' / f F?• X IZ nch 30 n "iE r I`• /X Ix 5E " 1 1 1-A x I x 10 x x I C x . - 7 x xx X1 G x x x SPA X XA x x X' I; x x x - F '? I - x X I --- ?---- x / I N OD N .. m I WALK WO 1 { x. a. Xr r - . ND rtA 25 R I . I / ) x X ?.- x PNtMIN(20ARNiE \ 1 6R X X . I ATTACHED 41677E E4,12E876F pp X a r FIRE-32M w'A-O-w V I w'a20NS STO A,ER POOL A 1 . ` ' MANGLES ((-) 3 x i AIXA I x6 "' x % +., , _.X x Q 1 T) x x x I I xfi X x -? X A x (49 WIDE ARCHTECTURAL CONC. SIDEWALK&9N.N. 1 I -- ' (SEE AACHTECILWA. PLANS X t I I ' I FOR DETAILS) w' A w?. 1 /? < I/ i' r x (! X , x 0 TAANYCPAER PAD LDCAnCN IT" / / , i 1P / I r I' xX: ' _ K .., x . x x ^ 4., x?- iQ J '» x xX wDW WORTH x I \ __ \\? 1 I X x I. i CLUBHOUSE D L • .x")ti nr e ? L X C RIB , TA x x ? • i RIFE-2'1 00 , . / / . x x x X I' I w. W I /x .x X % I i . -3, -X I 1 I x X I-B I-C X x x FD I-D \6 \\ ) PW % X O x / x1`1 ' I 1 PRIVACY x x \ \\ / I A,7s I AIL $ . \\\\ / -x - 1r \ I V x c 1 x-a END OF X \ IF I ( ? j I -/ - - T - - X , ?_x_ / I _________ -- R7ADwwr Sao ' GENERATOR LOG' CH PUNS Fat (m _ _- AP __ Dnexsl \ y4- I - _ * /h alj, S I • SAW NT - fNIEGNG PAtfiENT SERIENID H M IR w - M ' ENCLOSIRE (5[[ FCNI Y & Iw - PLANS FGR DETAILS) , I I WNd dIa y 9 Id I L. I 6' SCR WMPA E14aAl .-No CROSSWALK ] i P E RCH. I MCLONRE IEEE ARCH PER i00i NPEX 1171+6 (TYP,) V I 1 p S FOA MTML51 I Wr2 P) UT • 6' CONC. 1-1ENR A X. TYP I ! (2) wt-1 -DEAD END' • SIGNS / ....., ... . 1' . .. SAW NT & MATCH D) EXISTING PAVEMENT. CURB, SIDEWALK & GRADES )TYP.) RI-f '.TOP 3,' STOP BAR R JONO BFR(£T , 47 R-W GENERAL NOTES: - 1, ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. .* 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 Z ° SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 r ' II • (727) 793-9888 Bus V (727) 793-9855 Fox z 2. SITE ADDRESS: Yu MARKING CROSSWALK FOOT INDEX #17346(TYP.) d PARCEL 1: 09-29-14310-000-0080 PARCEL 9: 09-29-15-44352-002-0010 « 404 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS 1, I CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER. FLORIDA LL-) RI- 'STOP SIGN' PARCEL 2: 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 PARCEL 10: 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 I f U 24' STOP BAD 400 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS Q 2.-* '' S4NT • CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA , T- am TRIANGLE (TYP.) SAW CUT & MATCH x,G. RAMPS w/ wuxcAlEO PARCEL 3: 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 PARCEL 11: 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 (2) ' ROUETF6:$T EXIST. PAVEMENT 40'RWt w/e'smwxr ^ CURB IIYP ) DOMES PER FOOT INDEX Poo 314 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS (TYP.) CLEARWATEA, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 0 . PARCEL 4. 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 PARCEL 12: 09-29_15_00000-430-0300 a`N x T NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS 309 09 OSCEOLA AVENUE ENUE .y L? CLEARWATEA, FLORIDA IOA CLEARWATERRWATER, FLORIDA ` PARCEL 5: D9-29-15-00000-430-0500 PARCEL 13: 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 312 N OSCEOLA AVENUE 410 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE l p uTi - ?? CLEARWATEA FLORIDA 33758 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 1 ti II W . PARCEL 6: 09 29-15-53370-000-0010 Q FHI JI, STEP RISERS ^• NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS lu ,? I A R H / ISON 6.87 ° CLEARWATER FLORIDA 6 ' " > V g ,I ? 2IuU??ss C ClcI.IALRQ7jyWERCIAL PARCEL 7 09 -29-15-53370 000-0020 P R ? ?f L 9 3.68725 NO HYSICAL ADD ESS CLEARWATER FLORIDA 2 N PRE - 323 id PARCEL 8. 09-29 15-07910-000-0027 x A,57' 4gY 300 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE CLEARWATER FLORIDA N" . ' ZONING: 3. PRESENT USE ATTACHED DWELLINGS / RETAIL SALES & SERVICE J 4W ' 4. DEVELOPED USE RETAIL / OFFICE / ATTACHED DWELLINGS MIMED USE X - 5. TOTAL SITE AREA HARRISON VILLAGE 52,947.90 SF (1.21 AC) -7 ISLAND NEW 163,583.05 SF (3.75 AC) EH z to ' TOTAL 216530.95 SF 4.97 AC z V PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 263808,30 SF 0.60 AC W u m STEP RISERS M PROPO;;? REWIRED U D; 00 H-D 6. SETBACKS: ' ' 1 INN (NORTH BUILDING) 0.00 MIN. (NORTH BUILDING) - E ISLANONEW CONDOMINIUMS 24.96 Q a a & GARAGE as x 5139 MIN (NEST BUILDING) O.W' MIN (WEST BUILDING) W ' 31.40 NIX (SOUTH BUILDING) 0.07' MN. (SOUTH BUILDING) ' ' 'A. F a 0.W INN, (SOUTH DUMPSTER PAD) 0800 MIN. (SOUTH PAVEMENT) 20,50 MN (EAST BUILDING) 0.0] MIN. (EAST BUILDING) q 0 W O F 000'' xN, (EAST SIDEWALK) DOD MIN (EAST SIDEWALK) [s?T QI ?' d ETEP BISERSHARRIEON HARRISON VILLAGE 17.63' NN (NORTH BUILDING) 0.00' MIN. (NORTH BUILDING) -] ?? VILLAGE Q 000' UN (NORTH PAVEMENT) 0.00' MIX (NORTH PAVEMENT) V O z OHi RETAIL&UNITS V H-B 11 411 626E 19.06 MIN (SOUTH MINING) 0.W' MIN, (SOUTH BUILDING) • ' - 7U d d' W , . LD FFE-IlS TR410Pi NRBI e 0.W NIX (SOUTH PAWYENT) 0.00 MIN. (SOUTH PAVEMENT) (TIN) r-T J - 4.67 MN. (EAST BUHDING) 0.00' MIN. (EAST BILGING) ' 0 0.W' MIN, (EAST PAVEMENT) 0.00' MN. (EAST PAVEMENT) H 9 r TYP, 4.67 MIN. (WEST BUILDING) O,OO MIN (EAST BILGING) _ - QW' MIN (EAST PAVEMENT) GOO' MIN. (EAST PAVEMENT) 2.67' X H•t x 1 7 ALLOWABLE A. HEIGHT 30 50 FT. PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT 40'-0• FT. (HARRISON VILLAGE & ISLAND MEW VILLAS) (FROM STE TO PARAPET) 150'-8° FT (ISLAND NEW TOWER) ' '?%1 (FROM BITE TO ROOF DECK) STEP RISERS H-A FOUNTAIN/PUBLIC ART LOCATION (SEE TOGS I P1 8. SOUDWASTE WILL BE PROVIDED WITH TWO DOUBLE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, TWO COMPACTORS. - PLANS FOR DETA&5) Y AND ROLL-OUT DUMPSTERS. - I 8 T 9 EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS TO BE REMOVED = 36.873.37 SF O Ia z X 10. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED OR PLANTED. A R-O-W USE GT ! 8 PERMIT WILL BE REOUIREO FOR LANDSCAPING AND ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WTHIN R-O-W a 11. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WTM CURB z w x SIDEWALN AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. O . Y .S 12, FLOOD ZONE: ? RCLI-OUT DUMPSTER THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE VE (14 & 15). AE (12), & X (OUT SIDE 3 6 -I LOCATION (,YP) H 1 R THE 500 YR. FLOOD PLAIN' AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE R' • MAP NO. 12103CO106G. Yt SE STEP RISERS 1 0 11 A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED W UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION. M.a a U 14. THERE ARE NO ENVIROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE LANDWARD OF SEAWALL & WETLAND LINE ' O WE x X 1 15. PARKING REQUIRED ¢ SAW CUT s MATCH ATTACHED DWELLINGS WAITS (324 UNITS)41.5 SPACES PER UNIT)-486 SPACES EX157 NO P-MENT RETAIL (18,893,00 SF)A(4 PER I,OW CFA) = 76 SPACES 0 a T x 1,m). ;. TOTAL = 562 SPACES x g SITE DATA IABIF CUIRED fi EXISTING PROPOSED U 1 . . RE A• WIR .TPIPf MARRI80X ? (Tm.l A. TOTAL SITE AREA: 216,530.95 SF (4.97 AC) 216,370.95 SF (4.97 AC) N/A vn1AaE H.BRETAREUNRE W I RIGHT-OF-WAY 20,770.93 SF (0.47 AC) 26,388,30 SF (0.60 AC) N/A 11¢5.94 SF S. TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 122.746.10 SF (281 AC) 109,462,91 SF (2.51 AC) N/A STEP RISERS FFE-32-S 0 LIG HT ROLE C. BUDDING FOOTPRINTS 33,236.75 SF (0.14 FAR) 56,679.00 SF (0.26 FAR) N/A k V 1 GH ) -LARON E SIDEWALK/DECK/PAVED AREA', 67,95238 SF 50,389.04 SF N/A i ' F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 101,189,14 SF (0.4510 107.06804 SF (0.491SA) N/A a 1 C. PARKING SPACES x IYIJDNEW & HARRISON AUTOMA11C PAINING - 503 (324 UNITS). a U V (1,5 SPACES PER UNIT) HAMMMILMIEFff9EIMPROVEMENTS - 41 (OFF-SITE) +(16893.94 SF) u - W SIN GE ARCHITECURAL (FEAT HARNEW&MOLA) 52 SPACES 70tA1 5M SPACES TOTAL DFHC[(RETAIL a 0 CAMCNG(SEEN & A 562 SPACES TOTAL (.EE 1 ARC11TE CMRCNAAI BANS 'OR DETAILS) H. RESIDENTIAL UNITS 4 AS (HARRISON VILLAGE) ((4.97 AC)X L 2 279 (ISLAND NDNO VILLAGE) GEtD) I (50 UNITS /ACRE) a,67' , 6 UNITS TOTAL 324 UNITS TOTAL OFFICE/RETAIL 4 249 UNITS TOTAL o H 17. GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS, UTILITY BOXES, AND OTHER MISC. SITE FIXTURES WILL BE PAINTED, $ $ 0 • SCREENED, OR OTHERVASE CONCEALED. OR BLENDED IN BUILDING ARCHITECTURE ' RIB. PEDISTRIAN SIDEWALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER'S 117 REOUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS. - rv 19. OPEN SPACE/RECREATION IMPACT FEES ARE DUE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 6" STRAIGHT CURB OF FINAL PLAT WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST HARRISON ( 20. EXISTING SITE AREA: 222148.32 SF 'M COMMERCIM??LOMMERCIAL . EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY: 2077D43 IMF ; SEEP RISERS 9,81731E1F x Xe.e' pS PROPOSED SITE AREA: 2" 530.95 SF - zN 1 FFE-321 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY: 26388.10 SF "N , RAMPS W/ TRUNCATED C as y1 \ X-? /. PER FOOT INDEX 1305 OWES W g _ - x / x YP.) m . W / /x 1 `(2) 27,37 4C41T..SNUTY DRAWN BY: PAI TRIAN0.E )TYP.) WAY OAD \ BY (I) 201M NNRSECTION MSSUTY TRIANGLE (TYP.) CNECN BY: p6aN110A1 XE2 IBO O, Y 1MC C „ 1.1 -EENIS B LOCATION (TYP. OF CLEARWATER T T R P R PERMIT SET ONLY [ . e CHI EC AVEMENT(TYR..) A U AL (SEE ARCH. PLAN. FOR DETAILS) SHEET PER IX DADS" CROSSWALK PER FOOT INDEX FN,1„6 (TIN, T- TY P ' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 4 of 12 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 • SECTION 9, TO IP 29 S., RANGE 15 E., rA , m PINELLA OUNTY, FLORIDA 09a. RC% CMCNLrz e[iNN G WILL wxurcrz 0.LiNN14 A. - - - - - ? Pw La We9 . x M um F R JW SWiHERI.Y A/ W UNE GEORGIA STREET 1 g E ww RCEL 04 a'ow I h / 88„, : m 21246 p 150.03' v 'N8B:4O4 a'' 00, PA 2-4 F b'wmu°ml' erouJm ' v P ate 4' aX-W A/W aum - 249 - m 1/w le ) ^ sns . `? K s a'I ya aS , ewa ss' aT os a7w ss,p I 0 1 e a .? ' X e ?,sA 6' I n JO 15 0 30 ti ( - ® PARCEL E N J R A 9.1 LOT 7 " ' OR 3616, PG 221 ? ? R RSE ai SCALE: 1 =30 ? ( a LOT 1 1.r I I. nla r PARCEL E OR 3557, PC 559 PARCEL E OR 3557, PC 559 PARCEL E OR 1324, PC 520 PARCEL E L?T 3 4e' OR 3515, PC 221 ' w tae' 4 I sa ; K ? 1 lar yyy N I L' I ( 4 m ' / gJ Ad/SUBOSIONArES LOT2 ?i o f I Q P. C64 iA '?"C.vF.'I?.v..u9 rv ?1 L° 5 -- n de d, I ; I g I _ s F A9 I 4 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S00'50'40"W 27.97 L2 N00.08'39"W 13.65 L3 N00'18'33"W 28.67 L4 N12'16'56"E 48.67 L5 NI 9'07'43"E 51.75 1-6 N 24-23'07-E 34.06 L7 N29'15'19"E 47.35 L8 N25'24'43"E 43.69 1-9 N14'26'1 YE 53.80 L10 NOt'54'53"W 40.02 L11 S01'01'42"E 12.50 L12 SOW04' 2" 12.90 Li3 500'4726"E 12.31 4. I en. a ? PARCEL FOUR a m J V LOTS CURVE TABLE PARCEL FOUR S I r A e CURVE RADIUS LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD DELTA 7 nr 0? 8 i L0r' * rue tt rr CI 45.00 15.74 549'19'36"W 15.66 2092'36° o-i r 4 PLAT 0. aXJl? car y21 _ uM, JURISDICTIONAL UNE TABLE A I e' R4 - r W Y rs-? wow UNE BEARING DISTANCE - aa7 1?1RUas1 a hum JO LI N '1'45" 31,58' 14, JO L3 N63'49'bfi"W 32.99' 4 A PART Of SECRON 9, TOYMSHlP 29 ?II JO L4 N0654'1 "W 1.10' l91 SOUTH, RANGE IS AS! 6 ,p, a(p• q JD L5 N ,01'05" 4.2Q' 11. V7.xsne' m DPo 05CE = JO L6 N14' 7'47" .04' War pr PARCEL ONE JD L7 N4814'05^ 35.95 Q a 8 rv _ 10 J0 LB N565 '07" .9 ' oe 'IAC' A40.s lif n1 n JO L9 NOB-57'14"W 44.96' re ca i M4 104.fi9' $' n b JD 1-70 417'49'4044.83' 1 JD L72 N 1071'78' 30.87' ^ = 4 b n nr J C NI' ' ` = JD L73 NO3'4 'os'W 341' .i m r I , 0 ? i i 8 r i IA PART OF SECROW 9, PoNNSNIP(29 W? 1p A PORTION OF COKRNMEHl L07 1 SOUTH. RANGE 15 EAST 1 ta a Ip A PARE O SEC 0 9. iOXNSwP ( ac p 1 29 SOUTH. RANGE 15 FAST m ` n ( ? I I 't'A,1R 15' 1 N1s u n911 I / m ' s W / ? va° II 1e 1 ,. "?i lAUww / ALLEY/ VA CA TED 10 / ' N89- 121.94 m ?Inpu ell4 95J'10'W 8 49.2 y? eeu6m .- aY - '- - ?.._8 / / m1n ?[ " PARC 'L THREE i 91nR ® ? eP yA T A /t I _-r MGRESS/FCRfSS EASEMENT PER OR BOOK 7540 PGS 275-278 LO1A I CLO0S C,,gqCUTZ SB BO ? a Wa 5jg39,W 80.04 - - - - P NG 71 JS g ' ,ro 9 ra PARCEL FOUR LOT B I AP IJ1 '4i 8' 33.81' , .W f01'Ih ` ur Ap MJ 99' nn m A PORTION LOTS 2 u J J _ 0.7 a A BLOCK 1 JONES SU8Nt1SION OF II h LOT 8 w s' G SB999'22"W 197.97 ( ADDION CLE RWATERSHARBOR P.O. b i ? o ea V"eP ? ^ PC13 HILLSBOROUGH COUNT 4 µ 10. I ?? Qh tp S8919'22WW191 eeP n a i _ - Re l 1 r Nurv " ? w 1 m W . n" " ? 1 ? m ,e mm a o is lnrts m:' u torA LOT I Lot 2 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 2 a• Y p ' JONES SUBDRRSION OF NICHOLm+'SADDMONTO I LOT 3 BLOCW2 : r- ----- ---_-_ PROJECT , OSCEOLA AVENUE CLERWATER HARBOR P.B. 1 4 Pau HILLSBOROUGH GouNTY I Y T)PE OF SURVE Y: - - I BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY ® I ' _ - J Ta s \ '22' .00'- -L - B'22"W 100.00 PREPARED FOR: RR %NMTHFRI.Y WUNE9N 3a9G' nw ¦' TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC DER STS (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) N ` POLARIS ASSOCIATES INC. ' m PROFESSIONAL SURVErNG LB 6113 2915 S.R. 590 SUITE 17 - - - CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 (727) 669-0521 CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB N0. DRAVANO PATH: SHEET OAIE NUMBER RENSIONS BY ,IOp 1" =40' CIBd 02-J}24 R:\,N\3324\pWg\33241sPa2Ewg Z OF ] . • SECTION 9, TO IP 29 S., RANGE 15 E., f I II PINELLA OUNTY, FLORIDA I i +? ; I, -- a G9"LA[R aFT4N,X4 W4L Fv, esee 75?? ,Y, __ - RW Ie m1 ^ SOHERY RY EN E ? SW SWEET GEORGIA THREE P R - 1m?1[re 212.6 e 4 =- CEI ON RCEL iWC 150.03 01 u _ _ PAR L 7 1?1nan4. _.. 4'45'E 4D02 a °. N85'4045 lt? 100 2 Rnd'a ?eReF i°m o - ` 249' n ?•? - 3 ' 1 9zo aym 9 rvl m a nv .1 T am?m 1'rn ? 5 0.1 n o 0 0 N a d"!n s u9/w 30 15 0 30 PARCEL E J a"?v i - ARCE OR 3515, PG 221 1 I V _ i „ - lao _ SCALE:1"=30' 1 ? ? ]yy REE „ ? n ? nc I mr r i 11I I A PARCEL E OR 7557, PC 559 PARCEL E OR 3557, PC 559 PARCEL E OR 1374. PC 520 / I io-1+ PARCEL E ^ tJ 6 ¢ ® •.8 OR 3515, PC 221 I z. 19s e ]ss Q I Ru n I A t Z 9E 4L ? ? I I g w ? . B r, ?< < 'c 1' 9; ? I vv I b, LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 500'50 40 W 27.97 L2 N00.0839'W 13.65 L3 N00'18'33 W 28.67 L4 N12'16'56"E 48.67 L5 N19'07'43"E 51.75 L6 N24'23'07"E 34.06 L7 N29'15'19'E 47,35 LB N25'24'43"E 43.69 L9 N14'26'13'E 53.80 L10 N01'54 53"W 40.02 L11 S01'0142"E 12.50 L12 S00'04'22"E 12.90 L13 SOO'47'26"E 12.31 I r 3I "PARCELI FOUR \/- CURVE TABLE PARCEL FOUR CURVE RADIUS LENCrH CHORD eEA9mc CHORD DELTA < Y /' o Ci 4590 15.74 549'19'36"W 15.66 1 I £" Iz ?" a 70. 20'02'38" zS ?"! 9 ? '?afium PiAru7 X'1- ' •a cae' lnl iA PART OF SECTION 9, TOVAVSHIP(29 at b j A n - ? ' PORTo` OG CTRNM'NT 907 4 1 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST ` y I r i E 9l, I P A a POSE 1NG 9, TOWNSHIP 1 , I I q 29 Aq/IH, RANGE IS EAST I I ' _ I h j i k1/E IB Ee+9 ,l I I W 4.Y a7 4. 1 JD LI w .7 - m _ "c rc VAC4 rf0 !G ALL rc `- N89 45 121- mmIB 1Re N894 49.2 ' " ' 3 .- ,a fr4• m ?? )r W6 7A9Y x 10 895] J2' l J 0 also o l ? PARCEL THREE q:0 ,+m t 9p] n" r'Yd lRU nm 1NGRE5S/EGRESS EASEMENT PER G.RBCON 1,111 PGE 1J5-278 LOTa CLO T `4-,+P 50"W 800? UBO NSp P B. 35, G 76 5-1939 _ _ _ _ .ry v, PARCEL FOUR / 9e ? .44'1 "WS.C / m,l 9's DTs 89441e" , - 33.91' - ,,4• roe 89' 'W 77 p ",'9 H? A v-,oN m>5 2 R r aeY +,8.7 _ . 414 J 19.7 BLOCK 2 ' c G ' ,. SUED ADDUON 7 -, v. .. R 55959 2YW 187.OT N E - 1 11E1 H11101 P R C ..- " ? 919 P td , xf - 19.. ' N PG IS L BaAO_OH ,,... 1 3 HI ?' ? 1 III - o 559'59'22"W 91. 8' Z n n L. ft5 1119 0 `a - n 4.M +R ns ns LOi7 077 L s' BLOC I BLOCK 1 b' + Y I ONES SUBOINSION Of ] 3 p 9 r . PRO.,EC I NEA WATER ARBOR TO CLR HARBOR P B. 1 eLRCR2 a ___ 1 OSCEOLA AVENUE . PC1} HILLLSB LSBOROUGH COUN. TYPE OF SURVEY 0 Y . BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY - - - ,cur 589 '59 22'w 54. TO'- 100.00' 58939'Z2"W -? ? PREPARED FOR: y, r R 4. LINI v9 9'59'22"W 150 00' y . " .. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC 6 , JOWS MEET ml 1 (UNDER CONSTRUCTION) d ASSOCIATES INC. 1, POLARIS PROFESSIONAL SURVErNG LB 6113 2915 S.R. 590 SUITE 17 CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33759 1 , (727) 669-0522 . i I CHECKED BY. DRANK Br. SCALE: JOG N0. DRAWING PA1H: SHEEt - DAZE NUMBER REMSIONS __ BY JOO J? =4O CRM De-3724 H.\?N\3324\ewg\3324L9p92.ewg 2 OE ] fl _ _ _ p Q Il 9 _ 94.9 q e9 mlln lB@1e1rL91M'm mQ?F 9 A RARr OF srcnRN B, irowNSnro 29 1-? I ? nc _ I SOUTH, RANGE 15rASr ME/ey 1 a PARVL J ft m m / was f PROPOSED 05CEOLA F _w NUe PARCEL ONE " b 4 r? m' C °o-s "aiwr '?sn 9s 7lu=a _ yx? j II " ? I?t? N -0.i „?.,, rd fro 104.69' ? al ? I 2 ? r J ': ic?ln m D HARRISON VILLAGE/ISLAND VIEW RESPONSE tRJUN 14 203 Engineering: PLANNING & DEVE.LOPF ,',ENTSVCS _---- _ CITY QF CL.9MAT R 1. Submit complete application to vacate the following easements, alley, and Osceola Avenue street right-of-way: a. Drainage and utility easement retained over vacated alley described in O.R. 7270- 1731. b. Drainage and utility easement retained over vacated alley described in O.R. 7546-607. c. Drainage and utility easement retained over vacated alley described in O.R. 7270- 1731. d. Drainage and utility easement retained over vacated alley described in O.R. 7519-329. e. Ingress-egress easement described in O.R. 7540-275. f. Remaining east-west alley portion not vacated to west of vacated alley portion described in O.R. 7546-607,608, g. Vacate that portion of Osceola Avenue that is located between the north right-of-way fine of Jones Street and the proposed emergency access roadway shown on the plans. (contact Steve Doherty 727-562-4773). We will work with Steve Doherty to submit and file necessary vacation applications. 2. Note: No portion of Georgia Street has been vacated west of North Ft. Harrison Avenue. Any portion of "emergency access drive" located within this street right-of-way shall remain accessible to the public. Acknowledged that right of way shall remain accessible to the public. 3. Applicant shall install a handicap ramp for public sidewalks at Osceola Avenue and Jones Street and for the sidewalk along Osceola Avenue. Applicant shall also provide a handicap ramp ath the intersection of Georgia Street and Forth Fort Harrison Avenue in the same alignment of the sidewalk north of the intersection. Handicap ramps have been added. 4. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the development up to standard, including A.D.A. (Note truncated domes per F.D.O.T. Index#304). A note has been added to civil plans regarding bringing substandard sidewalks and ramps up to standard. 5. Installation of water lines is the responsibility of the contractor. City of Clearwater will install water meters and backfiow prevention devices and operate water valves as necessary. Water line notes have been reyi_d regarding construction responsibility. 6. All fire lines greater than 10 feet,in length shall be ductile iron pipe. All fire services are now all shodvn as DIP. ORIMML • • 7. Water pipes shall be restrained by approved mechanical restraints only - use of thrust blocks is not permitted. The City mechanical restraints detail is shown on the detail sheet. 8. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f. [sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. The decorative concrete sidewalks have been removed from the driveways. The driveways are all specified as asphalt. 9. Separate right-of-way permits shall be obtained prior to construction of brick paver sidewalks. Brick pavers shall be installed in accordance with index #113 of the City of Clearwater's Contract Specifications and Standards. Furthermore, sidewalk streetscape design shall be consistent with the approved streetscape components of the downtown redevelopment plan. Final approval for the design from the Economic Development and Housing Department is required. A right of way permit will be obtained and pavers installed per index #113. 10. Separate right-of-way permit(s) shall be obtained prior to any utility connection or construction within a City street right-of-way. A right of way permit will be obtained for utility connections. 11. A minimum vertical clearance of 14 feet shall be provided for vehicular access beneath proposed porte-cocheres. _ A vertical clearance note has been added to the site plan. - 12. All sanitary sewer construction shall be in accordance with all applicable city requirements. Applicant shall include applicable City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards indices in plans. Applicable details for sanitary sewer are shown on the detail sheet. :D 13. The City of Clearwater, at the applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any/all water meters that have to be relocated as part of this development, including reclaim water meters. (No meters shall be located within any impervious areas.) -? A note has been added to the plans regarding removal of water meters. 14. Per City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "B" Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.03(B)(1), "The depth of cover over the water main shall be a minimum of 30" and a maximum of 42" below finish grade, ". The depth of cover note has been added to plans. 15. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ORIGINAL 0 0 ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. The water services are all shown as DIP. 16. All polyvinyl chloride pipes shall be laid with an insulated 12 gauge A.W.G. solid strand copper wire wound around the pipe forming one complete spiral per joint of pipe. This wire is to be continuous with splices made only by methods approved by the Engineer. This wire is to be secured to all valves, tees and elbows. See City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "B", Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.02(8)(2). The copper wire note has been added to plans. Environmental: 1. More information needed to evaluate-please define jurisdictional wetland lines. The jurisdictional line and buffer has been added to the civil plans. All work is proposed outside of buffer. 2. A vegetative buffer shall be provided on all lands within 25 feet of wetlands- Please revise plans to indicate buffer zone. Development Standards, Article 3, Section 3-907 Buffer zone has been added to plans. 3. Please provide copy of SWFWMD permit A copy of the SWFWMD application has been submitted. A copy of the permit will be provided upon receipt. Fire: ----- j .1. Provide a standpipe with 2'/" outlet and 1 %2 adapter within 100 ft of the pier/land intersection for any docks/piers. An approved water supply shall be provided within 100 J ',,,.Jt of the pier/land intersection for fire department connection serving fire protection - !Z,-..?ystems. As per NFPA-303. water main and fire hydrant has been added to the plans in the rear of the roperty to provide a water supply to any future docks as well as the rear of the uilding. - and Resources: t._ ==? o. Show to be saved tree #15 and 24 prior to building permit. Trees have been revised to show as saved. 2. Show to be removed tree # 5,6,7,18,19,22,26,98,99,100 and all other trees rated #2 or below prior to building permit. Trees are shown to be removed on revised plans. :f ORIGINAL 9 0 Parks and Recreation: 1. Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. More details needed - site data table and number of existing structures. Site data table has been revised to show existing units. Stormwater: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The Engineer is to construct a storm pipe system in the relocated Osceola Ave. that meets SWFWMD and City of Clearwater engineering requirements. We will work with engineering staff to show appropriate storm pipe system prior to submittal of construction plans. 2. A cross section through the weir at the retention pond is to be shown on the construction plans. There is some concern that the weir may create soil erosion into Clearwater Harbor. A possible alternative may be a control structure with a pipe outfall. The emergency access road has been removed from behind the proposed outfall and an area of sand cement bags added for erosion protection. This outfall has been specified rather than a point source pipe discharge to spread the water over the uplands prior to discharge into the Bay. The solution should adequately address soil erosion. Solid Waste: 1. That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 Dumpster service will be arranged prior to CO. :-Traffic Engineering: Lt? I :*?, ?.. °r 1. Parallel parking spaces must be designed or strategically located to prevent sight visibility obstruction for both motorists and users of the pedestrian crosswalk(s). 2.Stop bar(s) and stop sign(s) must be 4' behind the pedestrian paver crosswalk(s). _Parallel parking spaces have been relocated along Osceola to limit sight obstruction. Stop bars have been revised to 4' behind crosswalks. a 2. Roadway widths and curb radius must meet Fire Department's approval. The fire department did not have any comments regarding road width or curb radius. 3. Show the pathway (ingress/egress) of a scaled WB-40 truck in/out of the two drop off 0 0 areas of the condominium complex. A truck pathway has been added to plans. 4. Where wi11 moving vans/trucks stage for unloading and loading of large household items? A paved area within the right of way north of the site has been designed to allow loading vans to temporarily park and unload. 5. Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at all driveways and access points. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. Sight triangles have been added to Island View driveways so all access points are covered. 6. Provide Do Not Enter sign(s) for egress driveway per current MUTCD standards. The access points for the garage are two way and do not require signs. 7. Provide directional pavement arrows for both ingress and egress of automated garage driveway(s). The automated garage driveways are bi-directional serving both ingress and egress depending on bay availability so arrows are not applicable. 8. Create a turnaround and install "end of roadway markers" (3C-4) and "dead end sign" (W14-1) at the end of the old Osceola Avenue/Jones Avenue intersection per current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards. The requested signs have been added to the site plan. Planning: f 1. I'm not sure the math is working on page two of 33 with regard to the ratio figures on Tthe bottom of the page. I think the original ratio was for 24% not 31 %; 2`. Start counting height at BFE on the elevations and include height for any architectural `e inbellishments. Generally, I want the proposed height for the buildings and all portions thereof to be very clear in the site data table and on the scaled/dimensioned elevations. The math appears incorrect in the narrative on page two of 33 with regard to the number of units proposed for Island View - 116 + 143 +40 = 299 not 279.299 + 45 = 344 - -.riot 324. Although 279 + 45 does equal 324 so I'll assume that the total number of desired i.._. units for Island View is 279 and there's a tpyo somewhere in the fromula; g4 Clarify the amount of property lost from the project and gained to the project (I figure it ma loss of about 12,000 sq.ft. and a gain of about 78,426 sq.ft. The property and right of way calculations have been added to the site plan notes. 5. Clarify the heavy dashed line on the east side of Island View. 6. It does not appear that there will be any surface parking on the Island View parcel. Is this true? ORIGINAL 0 0 All parking for Island View is within the garage. 7. Sheet 3 of 12 is missing. Sheet 3 is included within resubmittal, 8. It looks like there are two driveway for the parking garage - one way in and one way out plus two additional drives for drop off - am I (reading this correctly? Driveways to parking garage are bi-directional. There are also driveway drop offs serving the Island View front entrances. 9. Clarify what the garage doors are doing on the east facade of Island View and how they operate in context of site circulation. The design guidelines don't permit garage doors along North Osceola Avenue. 10. Is there a way to better treat the center part of the six story connector between the north and south towers on Island View. It feels like it should be the pivot point betwen the two towers but it feels like it got a little lost. 11. Can we more forcefully address the entrances for the north and south towers for Island View - the building as a whole is a grand building but there don't seem to be grand entrances. 12. How is solid waste handled on the site - it appears that all solid waste for both portions of the project end up at two dumpsters and two compactors at the southeast corner of Island View. There is one location at the south end of the site that will provide a centralized location for solid waste collection and storage for the entire project. 13. Provide setbacks along realigned North Osceola Avenue for Harrison Village. The setbacks along Osceola have been added to the site plan. 14. Provide a breakdown between retail and office space. 15. Clarify where the retail spaces are accessed - I assume off North Fort Harrison Avenue but also from Georgia and Jones Streets? 16. Clarify how the residential units are access from Georgia and Jones Streets. ©1` The access to the parking garage is from the relocated Osceola Avenue. The front entrances accessed from Georgia and Jones are for drop off only. 17. Where will employees for the retail businesses park. 18. A note pointing to storefront windows is on Sheet A18 but points to what appear to be residential portions of the building - this needs to be corrected. 19. Clarify that the main entrances to the dwelling units along North Osceola Avenue °Jface" North Osceola Avenue by providing proper front doors. ;,L, 1-)20. There doesn't seem to be a great deal of loading/unloading/drop-off area for Harrison { JP/illage, Clarify how people will move into the building with regard to parking moving -7 S trucks and the like. The Georgia Street right of way contains a paved area past the northern drop off entrance that will be used for temporary loading and unloading. 21. This is to confirm that the clubhouse located on Island View be used by residents of ORIGINAL 0 0 just Island View. 22. Provide a scale on Sheets ST1, the plan view on Sheet ST2, plan view on Sheet ST6 and 7; 23. What prices with the units be going for? 24. Clarify the process and timing of the vacation and realignment of North Osceola Avenue. Also, clarify that the realigned North Osceola Avenue will be a City street and not simply an easement (or not as the case may be). We will be contacting the engineering department to schedule a meeting to discuss the phasing of the right of ways and utility connections. The relocated Osceola Avenue will be a dedicated right of way. 25. Clarify the existing width of North Osceola (I figure it to be about 40 feet of right-of- way and 20 feet of pavement. Clarify the proposed North Osceola Avenue right-of-way and paving width. The existing width of Osceola is 40 ft wide. The proposed right of way width is 50 ft. 26. The landscape plan and the streetscape plans don't match with regard to landscape material location - I think that what we need to do is have one set of combined streetscape and landscape plans. The landscape plan submitted as part of the civil plans is the official landscape submittal. Any other plans are conceptual in nature and used for graphic purposes only. 27. At some point we are going to have to get down to the details of the streetscape plan such as street light and bolard types, paving materials and patters, bench type - basically a full materials list. It would be a good idea to coordinate with Tim Kurtz (562.4737) with Public Works. We would recommend a meeting be set up after site plan approval to discuss construction details. 28. Provide one set of rendered, scaled, dimension elevations. Elevations are submitted as requested. 29. Will a new cd on the robotic parking be submitted to refresh the CDB members memory. Copies of the CID have been enclosed. --,? rJUN 4 2M5 11 i ORIGINAL ; • Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE 2v -CO n CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) -- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANTNAME: I "RAMC-A'k -•pL, LC- F MAILING ADDRESS: -7I4 i C1eayw"' "' 'ril -31ZI-IS-S PHONE NUMBER: "T'46 0020 FAX NUMBER: `T 46 Dd O2 PROPERTY OWNER(S): - `DV,av -Pwi G?? ` U-c *\ YY1K?I?OP? y1WE?LU.? (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provid original signature(s) on page 6) 2 ? 1G7 AGENT NAME: 1 •'Kwo MAILING ADDRESS: ` I No ?1-a 1rl' 1 ?n ?C12ar WPX, 3315 PHONE NUMBER:? FAX NUMBER: u?1aS"" CELL NUMBER: 104t Iz1 I E-MAIL ADDRESS: v B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) )1 ?}{)() STREET ADDRESS of subject site: ?2) ' 1303 ; 312, 4t ?q00 4( -f ,?3. 3D? mcC 0 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: RInmej Wtfh 1'fY•? ?ivYPv? LAiolboeS, ti10NTb"t%vri5oil (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: _15PAR /i'pi;r 4 orI - PARCEL SIZE: 17 ?--4 C- 22 5, 2 a'o 5 (acres, square feet) ^f PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): ?-? ?AeC( Cl yJ eiLl in1 L41/61 'l 5 W135 t VA meVC4 atf (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): "yoi 01 Attach sheets and be specific when identifying life request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number o?paaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of • • • • • • . . • • • . • • • • • • • • E • ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO ?<_, (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. <? lJY 1? r?1 2. a proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly pair the value thereof. 3. he proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed se. 4. he proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. he proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. he design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, adjacent properties. ? P h 1. T a ovide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain w each criteria is achieved in detail: e development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without=deviations.from,the-use„inter development standards. f'^? ? LJ il` ?i J ?_? U 1Ct1U? t°t.,??v+ "(,; 1 Ut vl_LLWklf'?+ SVCS? Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infll Application 2005 it. 1'€ef%LEA+?wa?c A • 0 ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. he uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. a uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. dequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to void on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. T design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). U e separate sheets as necessary. JUN 0 9 no r??fitea?ii!yt` ,. l??U? ?`7Pf...r h' Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infiil Application 2005- City o ?LteaFw?tec? (Y '_ LE 4-AA,P ? fi • ? ORIGWAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criter Manual and 4-202.A.21) 5e-e- A ttaot-N ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with I City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; _ All adjacent streets and municipal stone systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section Oeeftokecl ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards lie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) rjee ?1tt?G?1? ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; _ North arrow;` - Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; - -j C 1 Y! ? 1 r. tJ _ Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; I Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; -k _ All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; NI ?EJ `vr ? ^ r _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and speamen rtq :??? p};,?+ • ` }Vt" trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in writtenttabular form: _ Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; _ Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: < - All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; - Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers: Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; _ Proposed and required parking spaces; - Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); - Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; _ Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; - Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; _ Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y. X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. L:J CE 0 1 i U N 09 2005 t_ Page 5 of 7 - flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- Cit gtW' Q i DD/E 0?Ivr NT FVCS rw F AaNAi Ft • • • • • • • • • • • • • ?J 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? ntn ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; Ip ?f? Y ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'% X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) 5kIowii491?, l0A ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). I ?? tom' 1 l? ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. 11 u.-? v ` " K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) e' r 1?1 1? a ? ; M1- ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: r LANIMI`VO DFEPART^ 1 • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF aaf 'aA .' °. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Actmo Bement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): /00 Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway I sand ach turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this appli are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and au Ci representatives to visit and photograph the property s bt m thi application. of property owner or representative Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn and subscribed before me this s day of 4,6 T`' A.D. 2001 to me and/or by who is personally known. has produced ?` as identification. JNo public, M mmission expires: A. CARPENTER Cen m# DDWAe12 EKI*03 1113/2009 Bonded ttvu (800)432.425 JPA*la Notary Assn.. Inc ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (uvV Pe 2-T1y5 Lt-c, 2i 5aQ VI L.Le9f&? ?Ra Et9j3 (- (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 8 ??iH 1400.?iO?- X03 ?{ N? cbceo t ? a f1VP.v?tk2?, ? Arlo 70? ,5et5r %A Argo 4 lbrttl&?yt Ay"IlAe . Goa 6v e 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) r ? :, Nwy' k? f!-2A 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (hisftheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Ihue), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. F? I^_ ?.J? Property 91-ner ?fl7,,D PP-A Np 1/rt7N Ld.L I{?R.t2?? Ir 1 A[ a V Drv ? ? a Property nP, ' APR 2 8 2005 J - ? _ - Property ne PLANNING DEPART: IFOT ,-_ ,...r Property &ne C11Y OF CLEARN?' " - STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS f th f Fl id thi i ffi d l i i d b th l St t f d r d f ay o or a, on s gne , an o cer u y comm ss one y e aw e o o Be ore a the unders A en 0c67 personally appeared Nstx ? eir who having been first duly sworn poses and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit4 at he/she signed. Notary Public My Commission Expires: ?Pr 00007 4 DDr7 M12 EvIon 1n311000 w a®? Bomled MN MM)M-4254= --- ---------- S. ]Planning DepartmentlApp/ication Formsldeve/opment reviewlAexib/e development comprehensive infi// application 2005.doc Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • IT ri21 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROS RIGINAL NEW COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDO DEVELOPMENT AT 302, 304, 308, 312, 314, 400, 404 AND 303, 309 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE; 400, 410 JONES STREET AND 410 N. FORT HARRISON, DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER For Submission to the DRC (28th April 2005) and CDB (19 July 2005.) RESUBMITTAL INFORMATION INCLUDED AND ATTACHED. D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (Section 3-913. A) Summary • On 18th January 2005 the Community Development Board (CDB Case FLD2004-05037) approved a proposal by Triangle Development to develop a 196 unit mixed-use low and high rise development at this site. Since then a number pf parameters have changed for Triangle Development. First was an offer by the Church of Scientology to buy a small portion of the southern tip of the site, and second was the relatively unexpected acquisition by Triangle of the old • Rahddert property. • As a consequence of these changes the Developer has taken a fresh look at the whole site, now much enlarged, and • come up with this proposal which embodies the feel and design characteristics of the old approved project, makes more • efficient use of the site area, and provides an enhanced contribution to the urban fabric of Clearwater. • The site for this development is located east and west of North Osceola Avenue, between Jones and Georgia Streets. On the east of Osceola a low-rise, mixed use development is planned. This will be known as Harrison Village. A high-rise condo consisting of two towers joined by a low-rise component is planned on the west of Osceola. This will be called Island View. The parcels have been assembled into a single development site, for which this Master Plan is proposed. They will be unified in design. • Part of this submission calls for the relocation and straightening of the existing substandard Osceola Avenue. This • road will be upgraded to meet City requirements, widened to a 50' ROW (from 40? and have two awkward bends • removed. It will also have parking on both sides and be fully streetscaped. • The area of the total site is 225,236 sf or 5.17 acres. • A Unity of Title document is in progress with our Counsel, Mr. E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel • & Burns, LLP. Similarly, street vacation and dedication procedures will parallel this application. • Harrison Village • The portion to the east of Osceola Avenue is called for the purposes of this submission Harrison Village. The location is • on the block bounded by the re-located Osceola Avenue to the west, Jones Street to the south, Fort Harrison Avenue to the east and Georgia Street to the north. This portion of the project consists of a mixed used development with • street level retail and commercial components along Fort Harrison, Jones Georgia and the north and south portions of Osceola, under a sheltering arcade, and extensive streetscaping around the entire block. Additionally, the block is • crossed at two places with internal arcades. This site's residential component comprises 45 high-quality condominium units and approximately 18,890 sf of commercial/retail. • • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 714 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUES CLEARWATERN FL 33755 • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: I NFO _TRI AN GLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • 1 OF 33 • Tr-, i g l e • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Units at ground level (along the central portion of Osceola) will have private access off the street. The rest of the • residents will enter the development through one of two arcades that cross the block. Residents will have a rooftop pool, spa and barbecue area. The Harrison Village site was previously occupied on the west by four two-story dwelling units that were rented out on a weekly and monthly basis. These existing structures on site dated back to 1925 and 1939, were not well maintained, and • have since been demolished. The "Salvation Army" site to the east site has eight buildings, two residential and the rest for social services, offices, and retail associated with the function of the Salvation Army. Their construction dates range from 1924 to 1992 with the bulk being older buildings with build dates around 1940 to 1960. Although the buildings are in fair to good condition, the Salvation Army is in the process of constructing newer and larger facilities elsewhere in Clearwater to replace the current buildings, and all the existing buildings on the sites will be demolished for the new development. Island View The portion of the development to the west of Osceola, and known as Island View, comprises two high-rise condo • towers joined by a low-rise component. The North Tower will contain 116 and the South Tower 143 units. The lowrise portion between the two towers contains the automatic parking garage (one story below ground level and two above) Above the garage are two stories of residences, 20 in number. The total number of units for the whole building is • 279. Island View will have a lavish Clubhouse with meeting facilities, exercise room, pool and spa, coffee bar, and ample storage facilities for the residents. The existing dock will be refurbished. The automatic parking garage is accessed off . Osceola. i • • • • • The south part of the Island View site had on it four older buildings dating from 1900 to 1955. They were in poor shape, having recently been used for short term rentals. The oldest was condemned by the City and all four have since been demolished. The northern section, the bulk of the site has similar older buildings on it which will also be demolished. Triangle Development paid a total of $12,830,000 for the Harrison Village and Island View sites. The taxable valuations for these sites total $3,964,700.The proposed value of the improvements for Harrison Village and Island View is in the region of $140m. All sites are within the Old Bay character district of Downtown Clearwater. Density Pool (Public Incentives Amenities Pool) Application is being made for an increase in unit density due to the provision of a significant retail and commercial component along Fort Harrison. This has incurred a significant hardship for the developer in which necessitates an increased number of residential units needed in order to make the project viable. Additionally the developer proposes to relocate, upgrade and streetscape Osceola Avenue, and streetscape adjacent portions of Fort Harrison, Georgia and ]ones. Application is being made to draw units from the Clearwater Downtown Density Pool. The lots, which are contiguous, total approximately 225,236 sf or 5.17 acres. The allowable density on sites over two acres in this area is 50 units/acre. Portion of the site (8,693 sf, or 0.1995 acres) is designated as an environmental area where only 1 dwelling unit is allowed per acre. The balance available for development is therefore 225,236 - 8,693 = 216,543 sf, or 4.9705 acres. The total office/retail component is 18,893 sf. The FAR (0.5) for the office/retail component equates to 37,786 sf. Total site (216,543 sf) less 37,786 sf = 178,757 sf or 4.1 acres. At 50 units/acre this allows for 205 units. The total number of units planned is 324, or an increase of 119 units. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: I NFOPTRIAN G LEDEVELC 2OF33 JUN 0 9 ?38-5' PLAJ?tv1N? '4 D l?'. err T :V??; CITE j? 1. ? +. ?i -r ' +' .T .r i g 1 e ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater The ratio between previously requested/allowed units was 191/146, or 31%. The ratio in this proposal between requested/allowed units is 324/205, or 37%. in order to promote mixed use development in this area the City has required that commercial and retail components be included on Fort Harrison. While the Applicant is happy to do this, the FAR of 0.5 is too low to encourage mixed-use development and in fact places a large burden on the development. An FAR of 0.5 means that for every square foot of retail/commercial use provided, two square feet have to be set aside from the total site. In exchange for this allowance form the Density Pool, the developer proposes extensive provision of streetscaping to meet City standards. The total value of the complete Streetscape package approaches $2 million. The Applicant's contribution to the Density Pool as outlined below far exceeds the previously approved contribution, due to the increase in quantity and quality of streetscape provided. More specific data is included below. It is proposed that these units be granted from the Density Pool, with a concomitant increase in height from a limit of 40' to 50' across the Harrison Village site. The Island View waterfront condo site tops out at 150'. This height is allowed on the west side of Osceola, and 150' was previously approved for the Osceola Bay development. We investigated the Harrison Village and Island View sites before demolition began. Existing on site we found at least 56 separate dwelling units. They were identified by on-site visual inspection, consultation with the property manager and counting mailboxes. We also noted 7,933 sf office, and 14,120 sf retail space. The office and retail area was calculated from records at the Pinellas Property Appraisers Offices, and a visual inspection of the site. The increased density meets the intent of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. 1 [E ((?`1 JAN 0 9 260555 ? N TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOTRIAN GLE DEVELOPMENT. COM 3 OF 33 • • • i i • • • i 1e _ g ?DMOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater GENERAL APPLICABILITY REQUIREMENTS 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, of adjacent properties in which it is located. OR This site is unique in its location. Proximity to the water, new Library, the Bluff, Coachman Park and the proposed Marina, as well as being a gateway for northern development from the Downtown core along Osceola Avenue, all make it highly desirable. Adjacent properties consist of, to the south, the Osceola Inn, a six-story mid-rise hotel; to the south-west, the SandCastle religious retreat, a newer seven story building; to the west and south, Belvedere Apartments, an older (1950's) seven-story mid-rise condo block; to the north-west, a high rise condo (500 N Osceola); to the North, low-rise residential and commercial including an automobile repair facility; and to the east, mixed use low-rise retail and commercial. The scale of adjacent buildings varies greatly. Single family, one-story homes exist alongside mid-rise condos. Generally speaking, the single family residential structures are all older and most are in need of repair. As regards adjacent buildings, there are none to the east and the west as these sides front entirely on Fort Harrison and Old Clearwater Bay. The block to the south is occupied by a parking lot and two seven-story towers, and to the north there are a condo tower, single story commercial and garage buildings, and two story residences. The larger buildings are newer or recently refurbished (SandCastle, Osceola Inn). The height of the proposed new buildings at Harrison Village is 50', with stepbacks at 30' and with extensive variation in footprint and elevation. This scale thus forms an appropriate link between the higher structures to the south and the lower building stock prevalent to the north and east The Island View building aligns with existing high-rises on the Waterway. No new low-rise single family residential development has occurred in this area for about forty years. The last condo development (500 N Osceola, a high-rise) was built in 1975 and only recently has a five story condo has been completed at 700 N Osceola. The bulk of the existing buildings around the site varies from one to seven stories, and from a tower (Osceola Inn) to more traditional apartment prototypes. Prolific use has been made of setbacks and stepbacks in the proposed development. On the Harrison Village site the units, have been stepped back at the second-floor level and has had careful attention paid to the detailing of all facades visually to decrease the bulk of the structures. They have been broken up with roofs, balconies, decks and trellises as well as stepbacks. These are somewhat difficult to read on plan. Attention is drawn to the sections and perspective drawings. Generally the Harrison Village buildings incorporate a stepback at the second floor height. On Fort Harrison, the Harrison Village retail buildings have been set back on average 15ft from the site boundary. Within this setback an arcade runs the length of the site, varying in width from 7 to lift. The distance from the boundary to the curb is 7 to 15 ft. This allows for extensive street- and landscaping. Along Georgia the setback from the curb is 16 to 23ft, along Jones 15 to 20ft, and along Osceola the setback runs from 12 to 16ft from the site boundary, and another 5 to 13' to the curb. Again, space allowed for extensive street- and landscaping. The attached streetscape drawings illustrate this better and show the considerable care that has been taken with the private and public interface around the development. Extensive provisions have been made for a gradient from public to semi-public to semi-private to private space. Storefronts along North Fort Harrison will have wide covered walkway in front of them, making it possible to traverse the length of the block under cover, as well as two arcades TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARW^ATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX' 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 4OF33 ORIGINAL Trge • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater crossing the site. These will be a boon in typical tropical Florida weather. Further drawings show how this area relates to • the sidewalk and the street. This covered walkway will provide shelter to pedestrians, and shade storefronts against • direct sunlight. • All units at ground level on the street will have private access off the street, and their own garden. The rest of the • residents will enter the development through one of a number of main lobbies on each street. • The two Island Yew towers have also had careful attention paid to detailing so that they do not appear to be monolithic blocks, extruded up into the sky. They follows very basic rules of design in being differentiated vertically • into the three components of a base, a body, and a capital. The base, which will be the parking level, has a different texture and color from the body, where most of the units will be situated. The capital is the topmost (penthouse) level, • where decks have been increased and close scrutiny has been paid to the detailing of the parapets and pediments that • form the roofline. • Again, on Island View, there are significant stepbacks to reduce the mass of the building about the 30' and 50' level on • the Osceola face, and about the 100' level on the north, south and west sides. • The coverage of the site differs from those surrounding it in that all the surrounding buildings have extensive surface parking for their cars, mostly uncovered. In this development almost all the parking will occur inside the building in the • enclosed automatic garage, and thus the actual coverage will be much less than a typical building of this type. • As regards density, the number of dwelling units being proposed is slightly higher than the norm for the area. This • aligns with the Vision for the Downtown redevelopment which calls for the development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown, and which is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. • (Quotations in italics.) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of • adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. • The character of adjacent properties varies from newer highrise condos in good shape to single story rooming houses. The immediate vicinity will be materially upgraded by the proposed development. The developers envisage that the • proposed development will set the benchmark for future development across the whole area. • Z. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land • and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. • The residential land use in this development is at an increased density, as called for in the Redevelopment Plan. It will encourage others in the area to develop residential units to fulfill the vision of the Plan. The value of surrounding land • has increased significantly over just the last few months, directly as a result of the present development. • The developers believe that by redeveloping this parcel in the Downtown area further redevelopment will be • encouraged, with a subsequent increase in property value. This will be the first significant residential building built in • this area since at least 1960. This can only result in an increase in property value for adjacent land. Most of the smaller residential building stock in the immediate area no longer meets the demanding standards of today's market, while the • land on which they are located has increased significantly in value. This will give further incentive for future, similar redevelopment. This is a strong vote of confidence in the potential of the area, and of the positive effects envisaged to • come from the proposed development. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the • neighborhood of the proposed use, • The proposed use is residential and commercial; this use is typical of this neighborhood. In addition, all relevant Codes • will be complied with from the inception planning to construction completion. no) - L9 U15 • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 [E t ,) i • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INF? TRIANGLEDEVELOPME J. M JUN O 9 ?,X5 LPILA f • 5 OF 33 Nr ,. 4 LXV-- •rPf . f '. • 3 !1, . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 Tri Ie g DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. ORIGINAL Fort Harrison, Jones and Georgia Streets are two-way streets. There are no vehicular entrances to the property from these streets. Osceola Avenue is a one-way street from the intersection with Jones to the north. It carries light local traffic (as do Georgia and Jones) and is not a major through-road. At present it is substandard in width and difficult or even hazardous to negotiate given its winding character. See attached Traffic Study. Osceola will be widened to bring it up to standard, and it will be converted to two-way traffic flow. Harrison Village and Island View residents will enter the automatic parking from Osceola. The automatic parking garage has four Entry/Exit Stations (EES's) (two sets of two) and about 85ft between street and the closest EES door. This provides ample stacking space. The system is designed to make multiple storage and retrieval activities at the same time. Typical dwell times (between each parking cycle) are between 20 and 40 seconds. This results in a throughput capability of about 40 to 50 vehicles per hour at each Entry/Exit Station. With this configuration vehicle may enter or exit at any station, allowing for the fastest possible throughput. In order to prevent cars from trying to enter and exit from the same bay at the same time at the Robotic Parking, indicator lights will tell drivers which bays can be used, similar to those at Toll Booths. The entries will also be actively signed so that vehicles attempting to enter the garage when there is any congestion will be waved off and be able to bypass the entrance entirely. No backing up of traffic. Please see attached White Paper for more data. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community character is residential and commercial, ranging from condos to single-family houses, and single story retail and commercial uses. This development provides an increased density for residential purposes, and increased retail/commercial components, directly related to the streets. The immediate vicinity will be materially upgraded by the proposed development. The existing building stock has generally seen better days. The developers envisage that the proposed development will provide the neighborhood with an upmarket structure, entirely within the community character of the area, and set the benchmark for future development in the entire area. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic, and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties • The design of the structure conforms to the norms of standard residential construction. Two 40-yd compactors will be provided on site to minimize olfactory and unsightly visual impact. They, along with the standard recycling containers, • will be located within a dedicated structure that meets all applicable Codes. In excess of Code requirements, this Solid Waste building will be roofed, and finished externally to integrate architecturally with the rest of the development. Another advantage of using compactors rather than dumpsters is that the number of Solid Waste service visits is • dramatically curtailed. Thus, no adverse visual acoustic or olfactory impacts are envisioned on adjacent properties. The location of the Solid Waste building has also been chosen to minimize traffic disruption. The residential component will adhere to normal residential standards and residential hours of operation will apply. The retail component will operate under normal business hours. C 9 1 t `_? .. 'U ;d t?9 %r)"3 LAP TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEA";TER, FL 337" • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • 6OF33 • 0 0 TIW9 r 1e ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ! COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA- Pt Aiar,l ,(L t DU VELOPUE1 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise=mpradreahivitliou?t deviations from the use, intensity and development standards • This proposed development does not deviate from the use standards, having only residential and commercial components. Application is being made, however, for an increase in unit density due to the provision of a significant retail and commercial component along Fort Harrison. This has incurred a significant hardship for the developer which necessitates an increased number of residential units needed in order to make the project viable. • As the retail component will be more neighborhood in character, with predominantly pedestrian patrons, it was decided to locate the entrance for vehicles to Osceola and to restrict parking to residents only and store/office personnel, with no provision in the automatic garage for transient parking. This was supported by the City and approved at CDB level. The use of Osceola for vehicular access has freed up the entire west side of Fort Harrison for on-street parking, as well as both sides of Osceola, increasing the total of on-street parking directly contiguous to the site. (See Data Table). • Application is thus being made to draw units from the Clearwater Downtown Density Pool. See DENSITY POOL above for calculations. Parking requirements are detailed on the Data Table. Additional comments in PARKING below. The increased density meets the intent of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. A number of alternatives are suggested in exchange for this, chief of which is the provision of streetscaping and public art. See attached documents. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties (include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The value of property depends on highest and best use improvements on the site and the market factors of supply and demand. The value of abutting properties will not be compromised and will most likely be significantly enhanced. A substantial public benefit will be created by the development itself and the creation of the pedestrian promenade along Fort Harrison with its significant retail and commercial components. At present the developer is considering uses such as an ice-cream store, a coffee shop, a video and DVD store, a bookstore as well as professional offices for the storefronts along Fort Harrison and Osceola. Lush landscaping and pedestrian access will be enhanced. Downtown will gain over 300 new households in an upmarket environment. Triangle Development paid a total of $12,830,000 for the Harrison Village and Island View sites. According to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser the total of the taxable valuations for all the existing sites is $3,964,700.The proposed value of the improvements for Harrison Village and Island View is in the region of $140m. It should be clear from the above figures at least that not only has land become more valuable in this immediate area but that considerable money will be invested in the development and a sharp rise can be predicted in the value of the adjoining lots. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The development is residential and commercial, and strongly encouraged by the City of Clearwater. By creating an automated parking garage, residents will benefit from faster storage and retrieval of cars, less emissions, less heat build- up in parked cars, protection from the weather, wholly safe access and secure parking. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC7A TRIANGLEDEVELORMENT.COM 7OF33 0 0 '1 0 T r iW9 1 e • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Adjacent land uses are primarily residential, with commercial components along Fort Harrison. The proposed development is compatible with the existing residential components and provides upgraded retail and commercial . facilities with sheltered access along Fort Harrison, the major commercial thoroughfare, and Osceola. . This aligns strongly with the Vision of the Plan, to provide an increased residential base, one of the primary building blocks for a flourishing Downtown. • 5. Not Applicable 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As has been indicated above, the surrounding lots are generally either already developed with higher density residential or are single-family homes waiting to be upgraded. The proposed development will serve as a forerunner for future i development in this area and result in a general upgrade not only of the building stock but also of the streetscape and general ambiance of the area. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that r enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of • Clearwater as a whole. 0 The form of the proposed development at Harrison Village is an upmarket condominium village, with a very active street interface along the busiest thoroughfare, Fort Harrison, and carefully detailed smaller scale buildings along the remaining streets. Island View is a typical high-rise form but with special attention paid to stepbacks to produce a "wedding cake" • effect, which reduces the visual impact of the mass of the building. Functionally, both buildings are of a standard pattern for high and low-rise condominium buildings. The community character will be enhanced by the design. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for redevelopment and the City of Clearwater as • a whole. Setbacks No flexibility is requested for lot width or required setbacks. Zero setbacks are permissible in the Downtown area. • Compliance is made with the 20 ft sight triangles at the applicable corners and vehicular access points on the site. • Parking On-site parking is supplied in the automated parking in the Island View garage. The majority of the automatic parking • bays are handicapped-compatible. Parking requirements for residential units in this area are 1 to 1.5 per unit. There are 324 units. At 1.5 per unit, 486 are required. Over 500 places will be provided in the garage with a further 40-plus on-street parking places. Please see attached Data Table for more info. Visitors may obviously park on the street, but will more likely make use of the robotic • parking. The person whom they are visiting can arrange for the remote validation of the parking to make it free. City requirements for the commercial/retail component are 2 to 4 per 1,000 sf. 0' M? ! S LS O 1J L • • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT CDMPANY, LLC JUN O9 2335 714 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR WATER, FL 33755 • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO TRIANGLEDEVEL rENT.GOM„ PLA a OF 33 rtYb Of i/?.. .?.lraA Q' ' • T r iORIGINAL • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • It was discussed at length and agreed with members of the Planning department that the automatic garage would provide parking only for owners and a limited number of staff for the stores and offices. No casual parking for the retail/commercial component need be provided. The majority of the users of the retail/commercial component would be foot-traffic, and there is sufficient parking for the balance in the parking provided on street around the perimeter of the site. It was further felt that few casual users would actually access the automatic parking garage on Osceola. The commercial component is in use during the hours that there is least residential occupancy. Given the high density of • the development, it is felt that the commercial component will be served by a larger percentage of foot traffic. More people living closer equals less vehicular traffic. The robotic parking facilities can be programmed to allocate any number of places to residential or commercial uses. The capabilities and advantages of the automatic parking garage to residents are the subject of a White Paper by the manufacturers, Robotic Parking, which is included in this submission. Handicap accessibility to ADA standards is incorporated in the garage. There are an additional on-street parking places created by the development, on Osceola and Fort Harrison. On- street parking within 1,000 ft of the property totals over 100 spaces, not including the Steinmart/Library lot. As use of the Density Pool is being requested, the height of the Harrison Village building will allowed to be lifted from • the mandated 40' to the 50' limit. At present the design has a roof height of 40' so this provision may not be needed. The Developer would however choose to retain the option of increased height, should it be needed. Above the roof height 30" parapets will be extended (per definition of Height in Section 8-102 of the Clearwater Community Development Code) and the elevator and mechanical equipment rooms may extend the full permitted 16' above the allowed building height. The clocktowers on the corners of Jones, Georgia and Fort Harrison would take advantage of • the definition of mechanical rooms to rise above the rooflines to create functional and aesthetic landmarks. The Island View property remains at the 150' level. Additional units are being requested from the Density Pool. This conforms to the spirit of increased density, one of the aims of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The developers have discussed a range of choices for the provision of Public Amenities, so the benefits that accrue to the developers from these units could be reciprocated. Significant contributions to Streetscape on the site were previously approved at CDB, and the developer believes this arrangement should continue to be satisfactory. The developers are • very confident some mutually beneficial agreement can easily be reached, where the Downtown urban fabric is materially enhanced, for the advantage of all. • Major Contributions to Streetscape. Please see the attached document and drawings which detail the contributions to Streetscape. It is anticipated at this • stage that the building will have covered arcades partially along the retail/commercial frontage of Fort Harrison and Osceola, and two arcades traversing the block. The sidewalks and benches, trash receptacles, bicycle racks and more around the site will be brought up to the high standards of the Clearwater Streetscape, with lush landscaping. Gas street lighting will, it is anticipated, be used across the development. The landscaping proposal will provide further details. At the Fort Harrison corners of Jones and Georgia, attractive working clocktowers will be built to landmark the site along . the Fort Harrison corridor, which forms the entrance and gateway to Downtown Clearwater. There will also be well-designed public fountains, located on Fort Harrison and Osceola. These will most likely be individually designed and fabricated in cast glass buy a nationally-known local artist, and form the Public Art amenity portion of the Public Amenities Incentive Pool (Density Pool.) • Bicycle Traffic i As the Downtown area becomes more friendly, and given the proximity of the site to the Pinellas Trail (two blocks) and noting the relatively large amount of bicycle traffic, secure bicycle racks (to City standards) will be provided for residents and shoppers. It is anticipated a large number of people would avail themselves of this facility. The developer has met u TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC j 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARI TER. FL 33755 `f Ott) ?} rf w.?. TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INF? TR I AN G L EDEVELO P,. EN !. OM 0 n55 9 ?F 33 C , .,, , f`1 r%o 0, _. r-???VI I' r? • • • • • • • • • • • • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Tr igle DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ORIGINA Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater with Felicia Leonard of the City and briefed her on the project. She was pleased with the overall project, will continue to monitor it and will have comments when more detailed plans are presented. Drop-offs Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape plans, and in the parking garage entrance off Osceola (as well as two dedicated offloading bays within the automatic garage itself). Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. There is a bus stop and shelter on Fort Harrison. 9. Adequate off--street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. Development Standards call for 1 to 1.5 parking places per unit. This development falls within this range. (See 8 above.) 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District Design Guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. An analysis of the Downtown Redevelopment plan was made and the proposed development was found to align with many specific points, as outlined below, and contradict none. Signage The signage component will be the subject of a separate submittal. Although the tenants are not yet finalized, signage standards more strict than those of the City will be enforced. A full signage package will be submitted for review when more is known of the tenant requirements. Generally speaking, however, signage will be hung in the space under the arches of the arcade, integrated into the overall architectural design, and uniform from shop to shop. Signage for the development will most likely be made outside each entrance lobby, probably on the awning at the door. See the Streetscape drawings. Staging and Phasing Harrison Village and Island View The Island View property has had some of the existing structures demolished. The Harrison Village property has also had some structures demolished, on the portion previously owned by Markopoulos. The majority portion is presently occupied by the Salvation Army, and when their new campus on Drew is ready to be occupied they will move. This date is anticipated to be after June, 2005. Demolition of the remainder of the site will occur as it is vacated, with construction immediately following. The developer aims to open Island View and Harrison Village at the same time. As construction for Island View will take 18 months, and Harrison Village only 10 months, construction will start on the Island View property first. The Harrison Village site will be used for staging the building materials associated with the first months of construction on Island View. Then the site will be cleared and construction of Harrison Village commence there. Throughout all this time, the re-aligned Osceola Avenue will be graded and compacted to sub-grade, and will be kept passable for emergency vehicles only and closed to public vehicular traffic. Signage will be installed on the old Osceola "stub" to prevent confusion with the relocation of Osceola. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCa7TRIAl 10 OF 33 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • T 17 1e g DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Vision of Plan ORIGINAL The Vision section of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan calls for (quotations in italics) a vibrant downtown that is mindful of its heritage, noting that the revitalization of Downtown Clearwater is critical to the City's overall success It calls for the development of an integrated community of retail, residential, office and recreation, especially a variety of residential projects to attract new residents, this being a critical factor in the success of a revitalized Downtown. A quick perusal of the Site Plan of this development will reveal all these elements. It cannot be denied that the increase in upmarket residential units as close as these to the Downtown core signals the start of a new impetus towards the revitalization of Downtown. The developers are aware of the potential of Downtown, as shown by their confidence in property acquisition and willingness to build on the property they have acquired rather than leave it undeveloped 'as an investment'. They feel a responsibility towards their City, and a strong desire for it to grow strong, and grow strong with it. Further, the vision calls for Osceola and Fort Harrison to be redeveloped as pedestrian-oriented streets The presence and siting of the new building will strengthen this endeavor by responding at street level to create an attractive streetsca pe. The Plan states that quality urban design is critical to new construction. The developers align strongly with this statement, and feel that their contribution to the urban fabric is of highest quality. Market related forces make this a necessity. The proposed streetscape, as part of the package proposed, will also enhance the experience and vitality of Downtown. Additionally, the elimination of blighting conditions is critical to the future health of Downtown. Attention is drawn to the attached photographs of the existing conditions on the site. While performing a necessary function of provision of • residential housing, the proposed upgrades will go a long way to increasing not only the tax base of the City but also • encourage further economic revitalization. A cursory view of the existing conditions on the site will reveal the necessity of this development. • Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Plan • • Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living. • The proposed development will attract (and already has started to) people not only from Clearwater itself, but from as far away as Australia. The proximity of the facilities provided by the SandCastle Religious Retreat will account, it is • believed, for a number of residents. The upmarket stores planned will further attract non-residents, who will get to know • and use downtown more and more. It will snowball. Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be • consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. • This development is consistent with the spirit of the neighborhood, and will follow the directions of the Downtown Design guidelines. • Objective IE. A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable • employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents. Business will be encouraged to occupy the offices and stores planned along Fort Harrison, Georgia, ]ones and Osceola. JLIL i.J TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 `? (?I ?j? TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INF? TRIANGLEDEVELOPM'. I C LJ • 1 1 OF 33 PLAPvI' *,!I', 5, DEVE10""w[K. • r J-N OF 0Lt APWATF 1 131 Tri g le ORIGINAL °• OEVEIOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Objective 1G.• Residential uses in Downtown are encouraged with a variety of densities, housing types and affordability consistent with the character districts: This development provides residential condominiums in a range of sizes (one to three bedrooms) and a range of types (low-rise, lofts, high rise, villas, courtyard- and urban street-facing units) and is wholly consistent with this Objective, and the character of this District. It provides a higher density of housing in an area that needs an increase in population for the good of the City. Objective IH. A variety of incentives shall be available to encourage redevelopment within the Downtown. This development will be one of the first to partake of the "Density Pool". Objective 11. The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. Obviously this Objective has been more than met, with the quantity of housing to be provided. Objective IK.• Downtown shall be a safe environment for both residents and visitors by addressing real and perceived public safety issues By removing low-quality housing, a perceived public safety threat is ameliorated. These properties have had, in the past, a fairly high traffic of public safety officer visits. Movement Goal Objective 2A: The Downtown street grid should be maintained No change is made to the street grid. Osceola Avenue is relocated, realigned and improved. The pedestrian street grid is improved with the arcades piercing the long Harrison Village block, allowing an easy flow through between Fort Harrison and Osceola. Objective 2H. A variety of parking solutions for motorized and non-motorized vehicles shall be pursued to support redevelopment while maintaining ease of access and parking throughout the Downtown. A very creative solution has been provided her with the ground-breaking use of automated valet, or "robotic" parking, a first in the County if not the State. Bicycles and their ilk have not been forgotten, and provision will be made for their safe and secure storage, with special attention being paid to the ease with which they may be accessed for use. Objective 21. Redevelopment and shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout Downtown. By upgrading the sidewalks, providing streetscaping and building something attractive to walk past, this Objective will reinforced. See attached documents and drawings for Streetscape data. Amenity Goal Goal 3: Create Downtown as a memorable place to be enjoyed by residents and visitors that capitalizes on Clearwater's waterfront location, natural resources, built environment and history. Objective 38. The new main Library will serve as a cultural attraction and an anchor for the northern section of the downtown core. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO?TRIANGLEDEVELOI?M?E N, ' r'tA,? Svc 1 2 OF 33 ,?-IJ L5 r sd? ???, 0 9 ' 1?15 .!UN 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 (? LU • ORIGINAL ? i g l e T r DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • It is no coincidence that this development, which is the first residential project to be started in many years in the northern section of the downtown core, should be proposed so soon after the completion of the new Main Library. This • cultural anchor, a visible show of confidence in the area, is one of the main reasons why this site and is regarded as an ideal location for new development. • Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown s character and heritage. • The Harrison Village buildings represent a particular building form, (multi-family, mid-rise residential) which respects and enhances Downtown's character and heritage. Historical references are used in a context of modern design, forming a blend that will not look out of place in its surroundings while preserving a very specific design identity of its own. The Island View high rise continues the Mediterranean Revival design theme of the Village. • A vibrant downtown will be promoted by providing an ambient population who will live in and enjoy Downtown and contribute to the life in Downtown, both economically and culturally. Policies • Policy is The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. This project strives to be consistent and follow these excellent Guidelines. • Policy 1: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. We believe that this project sets the Gold Standard for the Old Bay district. • Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The pedestrian environment will be enhanced by this new development. As the vision statement of the Downtown • Redevelopment Plan calls for Osceola to be regarded as a pedestrian oriented street, the presence and siting of the new buildings will respond at street level to create an attractive streetscape. Trees and planters will be provided and maintained, and a shelter will be provided against showers and sun along the street facades, and arcades will cross the • long Harrison Village block in two places. The buildings were set back from the street at the request of the City to incorporate a covered walkway along the face of the retail and commercial component, and include lush landscaping (similar to that on the adjoining block on the south) and provide for extensive streetscaping. This also makes for a more • amenable environment for the dwelling units above. • Storefronts will have wide covered walkway in front of them, making it possible to traverse the entire length of the block under cover. This will provide shelter to pedestrians, and shade storefronts against direct sunlight. This is a boon in typical Florida weather. Further drawings show how this area relates to the sidewalk and the street. Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for • projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected public amenities.. The Public Amenities Incentive Pool is the vehicle through which developers wish to increase the density and height allowances for this site, as referred to earlier. Such increases are allowable in this section of the Old Bay character TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC p1? 6 • 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 ' 11 JUN 0 9 rV TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: IN F?OTRIAN GL EDEVELOPM E r1rr CoM 1 _ • PLAl', 1) "Ic 0)iV1r- 1 3 OF 33 rV'' r-'LE- n'?.?`;>•1 0 • Tri gle ORIGINAL • OEYEIOPMENT COMPANY, LlC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater district. The provision of selected public amenities has also been referred to earlier, with the provision of streetscape contributions and public art. Policy 14: The education of Downtown property owners should be emphasized regarding Clearwater building and property maintenance standards Litter control and maintenance of landscaped areas shall be a priority for Downtown. The City will maintain its properties and public infrastructure as the example for other property owners Litter control and maintenance is vital to the continued positive perception of the development and the maintenance of its actual and perceived value. Careful consideration has been put to the subject of solid waste, in consultation with the Solid Waste Department, and two trash compactors will be used, in an insulated roofed enclosure, with provision for recycling and cardboard disposal. Policy 17 Property owners/developers are encouraged to meet with area neighborhood associations/business groups • prior to submitting a major redevelopment project for City review. This is ongoing. Neighbors have been contacted on all sides, and documentation of support for this development will be • forthcoming. So far, the following have been contacted and all have voiced their approval and support. • Church of Scientology. Strong approval. A presentation has been made to the Downtown Development Board for the previous project and letter of strong support i was received. . The Belvedere, 300 N Osceola, Board of Directors and interested residents. (Previous incarnation of this project.) The Curt Larson property (500 N Fort Harrison) has been acquired by Triangle Development. Policy 18.• The City shall assist neighborhoods in the formation and development of neighborhood associations that • empower residents to improve their neighborhood and strengthen ties between residents and government. This development will form a strong component of the neighborhood association, and has a strong in interest in the • maintenance of very high standards in the area. • Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the • project. • A significant portion of the site and construction budget has been set aside for such facilities. These include a clubhouse with flexible meeting/party rooms, a board room/screening room, and a large swimming pool, hot tub, an exercise • facility with change room and showers, fountains, and lavishly landscaped garden. These facilities will be located at the Island View portion of the site. The Harrison Village residents will have a rooftop pool, hot tub and covered outside barbecue area, all on the roof of the building. The Clubhouse at Island View is provided for the exclusive use of the owners at Island View. They will be able to conduct only private functions there such as parties or small weddings. Facilities provided in the Clubhouse will be • limited to a toilet, wet bar, perhaps vending machines (directed to traffic from the pool) washup facilities (a sink) and a warmup kitchen. No cooking. No renting out. • The developers fully recognize the value of lush landscaping well maintained in setting and keeping value for a property. • The motif of the palms at the Library can be echoed on the site. Elsewhere landscaping is use to break the mass of the • building, and accentuate the stepbacks. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC JUN Q 9 • 714 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEAR WATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMEN T.COM Pl.AyM1!NC- & 0FVFL0F'MFNTSW?S • 1 4 OF 33 Of CL yXVA U4 • Tr iwa Ie ORIGINAL EVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC D Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Additionally on the penthouse level of the building trellises have been designed, to be overgrown with Bougainvillea or the like to provide a softening of the roofline of the building when viewed from street level. Policy 23: The City prefers and shall encourage alternative stormwater management solutions rather than installation of on-site stormwater retention ponds These alternatives may include neighborhood or regional stormwater programs that make significant improvements to the overall stormwater system and environment. Our Civil Engineer is familiar with the requirements of the City and we will comply with them. Policy 24: The City shall give priority to sidewalk construction within Downtown that enhances pedestrian linkages and/or completes a continuous sidewalk system on all streets. Pedestrian linkages across the site will be made by the two cross-arcades. Sidewalk reconstruction is a matter of course in this project as the developer wishes to maximize the aesthetic impact of the project by putting it in the best surroundings possible. Meeting Streetscape standards, Gas lamps, extensive lush landscaping, planters, decorative railings, new trees and palms are planned. An analogy might be made with providing a beautiful frame for a beautiful picture! Policy 26: The CRA will consider abatement of impact fees and permit fees as an incentive for redevelopment projects that are consistent with this Plan. The developers would welcome any abatement of fees, as we believe we are endeavoring to align with the stated goals and objectives of the Downtown Clearwater Redevelopment Plan wherever possible., as well as materially improving Osceola Avenue and Jones, Georgia and Fort Harrison. Policy 27: Properties whose uses have resulted in a higher police level of service than typical properties are encouraged to redevelop with uses consistent with the applicable character district; if a higher police level of service continues, the use will be the focus of nuisance abatement strategies and law enforcement. The developers believe that the redevelopment of this area will lead to a dramatically decreased level of police service. Already the level of Police service has decreased with the demolition of the existing buildings. , I s10 9 2995 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(O)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM I SC? 15 OF 33 ORIGINAL . Tri gle • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater DOWNTOWN CHARACTER DISTRICT The lot concerned falls within the Downtown District, Old Bay Character area. The Old Bay District is a transitional area between the Downtown Core and the low density residential areas to the north. Old Bay is comprised of a mix of land uses including governmental, residential (including single- family dwellings), commercial, industrial, institutional and recreational. This mix, while giving the District great diversity, also results in incompatible development patterns and uses • The developers believe the development proposed promotes the character of the Old Bay District. The uses are compatible; the site is located alongside lots with height restrictions of 100 and 150', and it forms an easy gradient from . these structures to the finer scale dwellings to the north. • District Vision Uses • The Old Bay District is envisioned to be a mixed-use neighborhood supporting the Downtown employment base with residential, limited neighborhood commercial and office uses A variety of densities and housing styles are encouraged throughout the District, as well as renovations of existing older structures This District provides an opportunity for higher-density residential uses along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue, provided such development is sensitive . to the established low-rise historic character of the District. The eastern frontage of Osceola Avenue may retain its residential use, convert existing buildings to offices, redevelop with residential scale offices or combine these two uses i on the same site. The site is located on the east side of Osceola Avenue and adds considerably to the residential use. It provides a mix of S low-rise one, two and three bedroom units and lofts in an exciting urban location. A strong retail component comprising ice cream store, coffee shop, DVD and video rental and the like are accessed from a sheltered arcade around and across the site. The character of the district is respected through the use of an historical (Mediterranean Revival) design theme • and the smaller scale nature of the development along Osceola, as well as the retail and commercial arcade along Fort Harrison. • This higher-density residential uses along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue are provided in the two towers. The eastern frontage of Osceola Avenue retains its residential use, and residential retail and commercial facilities and • combines these two uses on the same site. • Function The character of Old Bay should be strengthened through streetscape elements that identify the District as a Downtown neighborhood. As discussed above, this vision aligns exactly with the vision conceived for the site under question, especially as regards Streetscape. Development Patterns • Greater heights in the higher density residential area west of Osceola Avenue may be considered. The development • pattern in the balance of the District is expected to remain urban in character reflecting the low-rise scale (two to three • stories) of the existing neighborhood. Renovation/restoration of existing historic homes is strongly encouraged and new development should provide references to the neighborhood's historic features in their design. Redevelopment • should provide opportunities for comfortable pedestrian travel and access to public areas including the Seminole Street Launching Facility and Pinellas Trail. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC • ??? ^^y . 714 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, ER, WATR, FL 3375Ei J ?uJa TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO TRIAN13LEDEVELu J ?. C ry 1 6 of 33 ?L_LV?I?1?? T VOSI • T r iW9 1 e ORIGINAL • - DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • • The proposed development forms an ideal gradient in height from the buildings to the east and south of it. A fifty foot • limit has been preserved along Osceola Avenue. Through the liberal use of setbacks, stepbacks and lowered rooflines, • decks, the structure of the building has been broken up to decrease the appearance of massiveness across the entire development. • Its urban character respects and enhances Downtown's built environment and heritage. Historical references are used in • a context of modern design, forming a blend that does not look out of place in its surroundings, while preserving a very specific design identity of its own. The proximity of the site to the Pinellas Trail (two blocks) means that provision will be made in the building itself for secure bicycle and stroller storage. This is another reason the location is so good; and it means increased usage of the Trail. • The extensive street level and cross-block arcades will enhance comfortable pedestrian travel. It must be noted that the proximity of the building to so many key locations in downtown (Library, City Hall, Publix, Steinmart and so on) mean • that the opportunity actually exists for people to walk to places and not use their vehicles. This approaches an ideal scene for a true urban environment. • Prohibited Uses • • Automobile service stations, all types of vehicle sales and services, fast food restaurants with drive-through service, adult uses, industrial and problematic uses (examples include, but are not limited to, day labor, pawn shops, check cashing • and blood plasma centers and body piercing and tattoo parlors). • None of these uses are planned for this site. • • Downtown Design Guidelines • New Construction, Parts I, II and III. • • These Guidelines have been approved by the City Council and they form a strong basis for the design of this project. The document is very thorough and the developers believe the design of the proposed project aligns strictly with the spirit • and intent of the vision of the document. Any suggestions that may be made so the developer can adhere more closely • to the appropriate characteristics would be gratefully received. • Brief mention will be made here of the most pertinent points. Quotations from the Guidelines are shown in italics. • Access, Circulation and Parking Parking lots and garages should be as unobtrusive as possible while maintaining easy accessibility. • Appropriate: Parking areas for townhouse developments located within the interior of the development that maintain the • integrity of the primary facade as the preferred design, attached garages in residential developments, architecturally • integrated with the design of the principal structure... Full details of the operation of the automatic parking garage are the subject of the accompanying White Paper. • Architecturally, the proposed design calls for an enclosed and concealed automatic parking garage in the center of the • site, with the facade treatment designed to hide motor cars from any view and to disguise the use of the facility. In fact, . TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 ?f?A1 • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOPTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.CO M" JUN, 09 -^ ? iJ i,?3j ? fff 17 OF 33 • ?' i IPLA, r)FVEL0,PR,iF TSUCC? • S ?'?? ` tUAr;WAi Ei'J • TORIGINAL • DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • residential units will be built on top of the building, and false fronts will be provided to the portion on Osceola and on the Waterway side, so no trace of "garage" will be seen. The only clues to its use will be signage seen on Osceola Avenue • and entrance and exit openings for vehicles. Site Elements Buffering and Screening Buffering and screening help define spaces, block unsightly yet necessary elements and preserve and enhance an area's quality and character. Within an urban setting buffering will be achieved through the use of landscaping, decorative fences, walls, pots, planters, etc. • Appropriate: When located on the roof of a building, mechanical equipment that is integrated into the design of the building through the use of parapet walls, towers or other architectural elements, service and loading areas accessed from secondary streets, screened from adjacent properties and rights-of-way and placed in visually unobtrusive • locations • Mechanical equipment will be concealed on roof level, and internally or in areas of the site buffered with landscaping. • Landscaping • Landscaping should be used as a design element fully integrated with a site and building while also recognizing and defining the urban setting. A well-designed landscape contributes to the site's aesthetics and improves the livability in a dense urban environment. Landscaping can also preserve and enhance the acoustic and visual privacy of a site while • supporting and accentuating the architecture of a building. The use of indigenous species and other water -saving techniques are encouraged. • Appropriate: Landscaping compatible with the climatic conditions of West Central Florida that includes the use of native plant species and Xeriscape landscape techniques, Landscape design which enhances and supports architectural features • of the building/site where located, Landscape design that visually screens unsightly views, strengthens important vistas and reinforces the character district in which it is located; Plantings in landscape beds, planters or pots that soften the edges between buildings and pedestrian areas, Trees planted in paved areas provided with adequate room to grow • (landscape beds, tree grates or other protective techniques). • Appropriate and full landscaping is an important element of the design. See attached Landscape Plan. Fences and Walls Fences and walls shall be utilized around service/loading areas, dumpsters and mechanical/utility equipment to buffer • these uses from surrounding properties and rights of-way and to provide security for this equipment. The service areas are largely internal in this development. • Fences and walls may be incorporated as a design element to assist in defining property boundaries and entrances, open spaces and to provide a transition between public and private realms • Appropriate: Fences and walls that complement and are consistent with the principal structure with regards to materials, . texture, size, shape and color. In most cases the buildings themselves form the wall to the development of Harrison Village. An appropriate fence is • planned for Island View. r? • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 'I I q If 71 4 NORTH FORT HARR180N AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 1 li • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO C_TRI AN G LEOEVELOPMELNT'.GOM C ( ? PL4t 1 E3 ?F 33 k t' -V QC ? ;_2JvA r1 U • • • i 0 T rl=} g1e ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater II. BUILDING PLACEMENT Orientation Buildings should be oriented towards the street. The orientation of the front facade of buildings along the streetscape contributes to pedestrian interest in an area. A high percentage of ground coverage is encouraged in a downtown to create a critical mass of activity. See Site Plan. Buildings take a very urban stance towards the surrounding streets, especially Fort Harrison, with the retail and commercial component orienting towards this busy thoroughfare. III. BUILDING DESIGN . Successful building design is a marriage between form and architecture to visually connect with the existing and/or desired character of the surrounding area. A compatible structure is one that possesses patterns of form and architecture that are found in surrounding buildings creating 'points of agreement" between them while retaining the • individuality of the building. Quality urban design balances a respect for an area's existing or desired pattern with the design of new structures i • • • Appropriate: Buildings that have a distinct "base ; "middle"and "cap ; Low-rise buildings and/or those with long facade widths that accentuate vertical elements such as entrances and columns, or by breaking up the facade plane into a greater number of smaller vertical masses; Mid- and high-rise buildings that utilize horizontal elements that minimize the apparent height of a building such as balconies, banding, cornice and parapet lines, etc. These architectural "tricks" are used in full to break up a larger building into more comprehensible masses, with horizontal divisions to minimize height, and vertically to make the building even more urban in scale. The development is broken down into finer detail by porticoes which announces and celebrates "entrance", clocktowers on the two busiest corners and the pediments which refer to traditional symbols of residence. The buildings have a very definite division into base, middle and cap. Architecture The architectural style of new development or development should be consistent with the desired development in the surrounding Character Districts.. A variety of architectural styles exist within the Downtown and the Guidelines should not prescribe any one architectural style as being the most appropriate. New buildings may use a variety of architectural styles as appropriate to the intended use of the building and the context of the surrounding area. New design may use contemporary materials to adapt historic design elements into a new building. Various architectural elements that may be found on a building 1 - Cornice 2 - Lintel 3-Sill 4 - String course 5 - Transom 6 - Bulk heads 7 - Kick plates 8 - Double door entrance 9 - Fixed plate glass display window i 10 - Double-hung sash window 11 - Parapet PL 12 - Parapet coping All the appropriate elements referred to above are used in this design. jj N U 9 2Q?,5 1 1V i TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, r-LEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: I NFOCC?TRI AN G LE.E"ELO,. ENT.COM 19 OF 33 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . ,F Tr,l , 1 e 'Y ".DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Facade Design ORIGINAL All facades of a building should reflect a unified architectural treatment; however, there is a hierarchy of facade treatment based on location, function and level of pedestrian interaction. Facades should use a combination of architectural details, materials, window and door patterns and other design features to form a cohesive and visually interesting design. The proposed buildings, both on Island View and Harrison Village, have hierarchies of facades. Primary and Corner Facades Buildings on comer lots at the intersections of streets designated on the Master Streetscape Plan are considered to have two primary facades and should receive the highest level of design treatment on those facades Appropriate: The primary facades as the most highly designed facade utilizing the following elements. A change in plane, building wall projection or recess; architectural details; variety in color, material, texture; doors and/or windows, an architecturally prominent entrance with door located on the primary facade. This has been complied with in this proposal. Primary entrances emphasized through the use of a combination of, projection or recession in the building footprint, variation in building height, canopy or portico; raised cornice or parapet over door... This has been complied with in this proposal. Primary facade, in keeping with established patterns, which include three articulated architectural parts: a base, middle and cap. The proportion of these three elements will vary depending on the scale of the building. This has been complied with in this proposal. Major architectural treatments on the principal building facade that are continued around all sides of the building that are visible from the public realm. Buildings on corner lots that emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. This has been complied with on this proposal, with corners of the Harrison Village site being articulated by a special unit wit an octagonal deck on the corner. These clock towers have been located to provide landmarks for the development. The corner location on the Island View site is also one of the entrances, so has had special attention put on it in design. Secondary Facades A secondary facade faces alleys, parking areas and Old Bay district properties along Clearwater Harbor. The level of design along a secondary facade, while perhaps not as intense as a primary facade should continue the architectural style of the building and use the same quality of materials On Island View the waterfront face of the building will receive the same level of detailing as the others. There are no secondary facades at Harrison Village. ?J .i t i j n i1 J TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC V?v" NT E"XT 714 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755'' ("1 r4 ' ?,?,;,G r?:V ?. Z"•l TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO?TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT:'COM 20 OF 33 • • • • • • • • • • • T r9 DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Windows and Doors ORIGINAL Windows are a vital element which link the private (space within a building) and public space (such as streets, sidewalks, etc.) realms visually drawing passersby into buildings. Doors are also a vital element providing not only visual but, physical connections between the public and private realms. • At street level, for the entire length and breadth of Harrison Village, and in its arcades, pedestrians will enjoy visual and physical access into the building through store fronts and windows on the retail and commercial component. Along the • Osceola portion of Harrison Village, many units will have direct but secure access to the street. This makes the • pedestrian experience a friendly one, an Osceola Avenue will become a pleasant tree-shaded street to stroll. Lush landscaping, planters and railings will separate public and private spaces. • Roof Design • Roof forms are one of the most highly visible components of a building. Not only do they provide a vital function but they contribute and are integral to the overall building design through the use of distinctive, defined styles and • decorative patterns and colors • The style of the development, Mediterranean Revival, calls for smaller mansard roofs and trellises as well as pediments, • and these are use to break the scale of the building by providing roof lines at varying heights across the facade. . Other Architectural Features • A variety of other features can provide the perfect accent or finish to a building or, conversely, ruin an otherwise wonderful structure. These may include door handles and hinges, mail slots, clocks, fir%mergency escapes, shutters, awnings etc. The same amount of thought and care should be put into the selection and installation of these features as for more obvious features such as roofs, doors and windows All the above are featured in the proposed development. Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes and the like will be handled • within the parameters of the Downtown Design Guidelines. • Materials and Color • Materials The correct choices of building materials are paramount in the success of any building. Materials should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building to which they belong. The building is conceived to be constructed in concrete masonry units with a stucco finish. Stucco banding, cornices and • window detailing will be used. Relief and contrast from this texture will occur in windows and trellises which have a smoother finish. All surfaces will be painted or self-colored stone. The base of the building will be finished to emulate courses of stone blocks. Color • The color palette of a building is composed of the colors of the main body of the building, trim and accent colors The colors chosen for awnings, canopies, shutters and roofs also contribute to the overall color scheme of building. The overall color scheme of a building or project should reflect a cohesive pattern. These guidelines recognize that the review of a building's color scheme is a balance between an owner's creativity and individuality, the architectural style of the building and an overall harmonious vision for the Downtown. The use of a single color on all surfaces should be avoided. • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC f I 11? 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 ' 1*' I • TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOO)TRIANGLEDEVELOPM ENT.:COM 1,4 1 fR:35 I U? I . ?? it ?-? V? L'- dai.?r 5Vv;,? i 0 11 Tri 9Ie DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater A two- or three-color scheme is encouraged to provide visual appeal. The main body color should be the predominant color of the building. The color tone of the main body should be guided by the size and height of the building, its location (corner or interior lot), and architectural style. The trim color is applied to architectural elements such as windows, doors, columns, porches etc. The trim color should be a lighter or darker tone of the main body color, a complimentary color to the main body color or a neutral color. In a three-color scheme, the accent color should be used sparingly to highlight certain architectural elements such as a front door or awning. The color scheme is conceived as basically a three-color scheme with tones of terracotta, cream, ochre and mustard, offset by accents of deeper hue. Lighter tones will be used to accentuate advancing planes with the color tone becoming progressively stronger on the building planes away from the street. The entrance porticoes will signal their function and importance with the strongest, or most contrasting color. Window and door frames will be darker. Pediments and parapets will be the lightest color to outline the building against the sky. Contrasting color awnings will provide accent points. Trellises will be a lighter color to set off the greenery growing over them. The base of the building will have a finish of contrasting three-dimensional colored banding which will have the appearance of horizontal stone coursing (blocks). 11 'Y I Y,? JUN O 9 2005 , TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 22 OF 33 Tri'' or"' 0 angle DEVF1 01'7.IFNT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Existing Conditions North Osceola Avenue, to the east ?a , if ?Jill JC;N0 9 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 OOZO FAX: 727 446 OOOZ EMAIL: I N FOC?TRIANGLEOEVELOPMENT.COM ORIGINAL J ? V fo?5 ? lA??fJ?G ' ' -, ' S Pre-demolition view of ]ones from Osceola to Fort Harrison (part of island View site, south side of Harrison Village site) Tr1W9 e DF\41 OPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater North Osceola Avenue looking west I L Georgia Street, north side of Harrison Village and Island View H W4 WW ? ¦ ?? I WIT Fort Harrison Avenue, east side of Harrison Village site 116 l TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(ZDTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM f,EV?LC;°I ofnT SVC ORIGINAL • Tri n g le oFVFi 111".IE,vr cotilvaNr, uc Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Aerial Photograph Showing Existing Properties `ham +?? , •? M • UKIWINAL ri F- ol-pa it I r ,r r 9 R.Y'S t 71. --?I & 11 IV L JUN 0 9 435 I- ..1r TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(Ei)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 7?. nc 7G TrVi'g'l e DF FI OPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater ORIGINAL Fr _ ? 1. 1 1. U- y?"":1 ».. e r t" him r 4 . t- e 'r 1 ? 1 ir, t 1 1' y 35 ?J] l?IAAlntily? J : ??C[7GP: o r $- SVGS TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARW^^ATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TR1ANGLEOEVELOPMENT.COM 'JF nr 'tea Tgle DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater PROPOSAL OF AMENITIES to be provided in exchange for extra units from Density Pool Contributions to Streetscape ORIGINAL These items are noted below for an indication of the quality of the Streetscaping that is envisaged. Please see Streetscape drawings for further data. Specifications are taken from City of Clearwater Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan, January 27th, 2003. We acknowledge this document is subject to change. For purposes of clarity, we used the 'Commercial A' and 'B' Streetscaping standards as our baseline. It was felt that the 'Downtown Corridor' grade of streetscaping was inapplicable in that it called for extensive provision of medians, crosswalks and work in the Right of Way, beyond the curb line. We will be providing extensive streetscaping in the areas behind the curb line and they will generally provide a level above that of Commercial A and B and equivalent to the Downtown Corridor standards. There will be a transit shelter, newspaper racks, bollards, and signage (indicating that this site is in the Old Bay neighborhood) and other items called for in the Downtown corridor standards but not in the Commercial A and B. The contributions would comprise, generally New road (re-aligned Osceola), resurfacing to Jones and Georgia New curb and curb cuts as needed Pavers and sidewalk to match Streetscape specification on each street as noted below Street lights Quality Hill, Hancock post or equal Bollards Hancock by Spring City or equal Signage To conform to City of Clearwater Wayfinding plan Benches Scarborough with center arm by Landscape Forms or equal Trash Cans Scarborough by Landscape Forms or equal Bicycle racks Gramercy by Madrax or as required Newspaper racks (if required) Spencer or equal Landscape fences on ground level planters Steel Bar by A & T Ironworks or equal Planting Medjool Palms (see note below), Crape Myrtle The palms on Fort Harrison would be planted not along the ROW but instead between the site boundary and the building, as the sidewalk is not very wide on this block and there is more space towards the buildings, which have been expressly set back to accommodate lush landscaping. • Along Fort Harrison COMMERCIAL A Equivalent Streetscape will match that proposed in City document with regard to all items behind (and including) curb. We will not . differentiate between the treatment given to the area between the building and the site boundary and the area from the site boundary to the curb. • Along Jones COMMERCIAL A Equivalent • Same as for Fort Harrison, except tree at greater spacing, say 50', to suit layout of buildings. Palms would be used predominantly on the Fort Harrison end of Jones, changing to predominantly oaks at the Osceola end, to ease the transition into the oaks on Osceola. Pavers, streetlights to suit. Along re-aligned Osceola COMMERCIAL B Equivalent Palms at corners and trees to match existing live oaks. Paving as above but much less of benches, signage etc. If Fort Harrison is 100%, and Jones 80%, this street is 40%. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC (? LT I ,- 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 IiJI ` l TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO TRIANGLEDEVELOPME OM !1 +? I 27 ?F 33 JUN 09 20.5 ??1 + ?' C -y • • 11 • RIGINAL • T ri O "DEVELOPMENT COMPA W9Ie LLC • Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater • • • • • Along Georgia, COMMERCIAL A/B Equivalent Palms would be used predominantly on the Fort Harrison end changing to predominantly oaks at the Osceola end, to ease the transition into the oaks on Osceola. Paving as above but much less of benches, signage etc. If Fort Harrison is • 100%, and Jones 80%, this street is 80% at the retail, 60% at the residential. • Cross Walks • Four pedestrian crosswalks across the re-aligned Osceola from Harrison Village to Island View. • Medians • None. • Gas Lighting We suggest that gas lighting may be appropriate along re-aligned Osceola, and would like to pursue this with Traffic and Clearwater Gas. We also propose to use gas lighting within the development. • Parking We propose that we make provision for on-street parking along the west side of Fort Harrison between Jones and • Georgia. On-street parking is proposed on both sides of the newly re-aligned and widened (50' ROW) of Osceola. Shoppers and guests can be dropped off at the site at the designated laybys which can be seen on the Streetscape plans. Deliveries can also be made at these laybys. Clocktowers • Two individually designed clocktowers anchor the north and south corners of the site, on Fort Harrison, are an integral part of the design. The will each have purpose-made clocks on the street faces, and are in fact the signature features of • the development. We propose these be counted as part of the streetscape contribution. • Fountains • A purpose-made fountain will be located mid-block on Fort Harrison, and another two within the arcades which are accessible to the public. There will also be a fountain mid-block on the Island View side of Osceola, and one each at the • two entrances to the towers. They will all be site-specific, individually tailored to their locations. At present we anticipate • using glass sculptures as an integral part of the fountains, purpose -made by a nationally-known local glass sculptor. • Transit Shelter There is an existing bus stop on Fort Harrison. If it is to be replaced, it will be done to the design shown in the • Wayfinding manual. Application will be made to PSTA to move it to the north, onto other property owned by Triangle. • Maintenance of items in ROW • To be agreed. • FDOT Permit • Preliminary meetings have been held with FDOT, and their approval, which is essentially simply for closure of several curb cuts, be required only prior to issuance of Building Permits. We anticipate that the transfer of Alt 19 back to the City • will occur during the Harrison Village construction period. Any work done within the Right of Way on Fort Harrison would be done after it has been transferred back to the City, making FDOT approval superfluous. • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC d • 7 1 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 ? JUN /?r?w[r^1 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX:. 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOTRIANGLEOEVELOPM +EN??i f T. COMET. COM JUN 4 E,Ii?IJ?1 f?' Li u'j 28 OF 33 ?n? • Tri Ie ORIGINAL g DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Quantities Associated with Streetscape Proposal Harrison Village, Island View, Site Amenities Osceola Avenue Item Total ROW. Material Quantity Unit cost cost Pedestrian Light 23 ea. $4,800 $110,400 Bench 4 ea. $1,700 $6,800 Curb & Gutter 6" 1340 If $17 $22,110 Street Paving 21800 sf $5 $109,000 Walk w/Paver Banding 6425 sy $12 $77,100 Crosswalk Paver 80 sy $90 $7,200 Trash Receptacle 2 ea. $950 $1,900 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea. $50,000 $50,000 Demolition 1 ea. $25,000 $25,000 Directional Signage 1 ea. $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions 0. & P. $0 $61,577 Architectural/Engineering Fees $0 $28,736 Subtotal $175,344 Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 2447 sf $12 $29,364 Unit Pavers 6160 sf $12 $73,920 Scored Concrete 2500 sf $12 $30,000 Fountain W/Artwork 5 ea $25,000 $125,000 Live Oak 16 ea $2,600 $41,600 Medjool Palm 11 ea $6,000 $66,000 Planting Areas 9363 sf $5 $46,815 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 0 If $14 $0 Bench 4 ea. $1,700 $6,800 Bike Rack 4 ea $640 $2,560 Trash Receptacle 4 ea $950 $3,800 General Conditions 0. & P. $0 $64,404 Architectural/Engineering Fees $0 $30,055 Subtotal $523,818 Total $699,162 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO( TRIANGLEDEVELORMENT.COM 29 OF 33 • ORIGINAL TgIe DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Jones Street ROW. Pedestrian Light 2 ea $4,800 $9,600 Curb & Gutter 6" 125 If $17 $2,063 Street Paving 1600 sf $5 $8,000 Walk W/Paver Banding 675 sf $12 $8,100 Crosswalk Paver 36 sy $90 $3,240 Bollards 3 ea $1,470 $4,410 Trash Receptacle 1 ea $950 $950 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Demolition 1 ea $15,000 $15,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions 0. & P. $0 $8,604 Architectural/Engineering Fees $0 $4,015 Subtotal $69,982 Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 650 sf $12 $7,800 Live Oak 2 ea $2,600 $5,200 Planter/Landscape 72 sf $30 $2,160 Planting Areas 660 sf $5 $3,300 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 105 If $14 $1,418 Trash Receptacle 3 . ea $950 $2,850 General Conditions 0. & P. $0 $3,934 Architectural/Engineering Fees $0 $1,836 Subtotal $31,998 Total ;101,980 Georgia Street ROW. Pedestrian Light 9 ea $4,800 $43,200 Curb & Gutter 6" 735 If $17 $12,128 Walk W/Paver Banding 1300 sf $12 $15,600 Street Paving 11200 sf $5 $56,000 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $25,000 $25,000 Demolition, and Grading 1 ea $25,000 $25,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 Bollards 8 ea $1,470 $11,760 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 Bench 2 ea. $1,700 $3,400 General Conditions 0. & P. $0 $29,248 Architectural/Engineering Fees $0 $13,649 Subtotal $237,885 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC CLEARWATER, FL 33755 71 4 NORTH FORT HAR RISON AVENUE }i ?1 n j f J { , L 7 iJ TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO OTRIANGLEOEVELOP MENT.'COM 30 OF 33 T I e ORIGINAL riWgQ D EVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Public/Private Walk W/Paver Banding 1425 sf $12 $17,100 Medjool Palm 2 ea $6,000 $12,000 Live Oak 11 ea $2,600 $28,600 Planter/Landscape 128 sf $30 $3,840 Planting Areas 8740 sf $5 $43,700 Irrigation 1 ea $3,500 $3,500 Fence 280 If $135 $37,800 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 General Conditions O. & P. $0 $22,266 Arch itectu ral/Engineering Fees $0 $10,391 Subtotal $181,097 Total $418,982 North Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. Pedestrian Light 12 ea $4,800 $57,600 Bench 5 ea $1,700 $8,500 Curb & Gutter 6" 592 If $17 $9,768 Sidewalk w/ Paver 3462 sf $12 $41,544 Transit Shelter 1 ea $10,000 $10,000 Bollards 18 ea $1,470 $26,460 Fountain W/Artwork 1 ea $50,000 $50,000 Trash Receptacle 5 ea $950 $4,750 Underground Site Utilities 1 ea $22,000 $22,000 Demolition 1 ea $30,000 $30,000 Directional Signage 1 ea $1,000 $1,000 General Conditions O. & P. $0 $39,243 Architectural/Engineering Fees $0 $18,314 Subtotal $319,179 Public/Private Scored Concrete 3280 sf $12 $39,360 Fountain W/Artwork 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Medjool Palm 12 ea $6,000 $72,000 Planter/Landscape 248 sf $30 $7,440 Planting Areas 5014 sf $5 $25,070 Irrigation 1 ea $5,000 $5,000 Clock 2 ea $50,000 $100,000 Fence 420 If $22 $9,240 Bike Rack 2 ea $640 $1,280 Trash Receptacle 2 ea $950 $1,900 General Conditions O. & P. $0 $54,194 Architectural/Engineering Fees $0 $25,290 Subtotal $440,774 Total $759,953 TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCO)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 31 OF 33 .?' hWUATEI9 TrWga l e ORIGINA?. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Site Amenities Totals Osceola Avenue ]ones Street Georgia Street North Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW. $237,885 Public/Private $181,097 ROW. $319,179 Public/ Private $440,774 Sub-Totals ROW, $802,390 Public/ Private $1,177,686 Total $1,980,076 ROW. $175,344 Public/ Private $523,818 ROW. $69,982 Public/Private $31,998 [_?- S TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC ??•??` rD1-V''-Q')'vj {?1 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRI50N AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 0? y F TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFO(O)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT. COM 32 OF 33 Tri I e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Proof of Ownership Island Yew (Old Osceola Bay, 302-308 N Osceola) Agreement of Purchase and Sale Proof of Ownership Island View (Old Rahddert property, 312-404 N Osceola) Affidavit to Authorize Agent Proof of Ownership Harrison Village (Old Markopoulos property) Title Insurance Proof of Ownership Harrison Village (Old Salvation Army site) Affidavit to Authorize Agent ORIGINAL JUN 09 299 ?? Lj TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 33 OF 33 k 4 ?, fx F' ,. 1 e T COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Proof of Ownership Island View (Old Osceola Bay, 302-308 N Osceola) Agreement of Purchase and Sale ORIGINAL i ; JUN 0 9 2055 i? TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 7 1 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 03/12/2004 04:31 r" ;! L J: PAGE 01 9 JUN 03 2055 ORIGINAL A GREEMIENT-OF-PURCHSE ADM kLE THIS AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE (this "Agreement") is made and entered into effective as of the latest date set forth on the signature page below, (the "Effective Date"), by and between OSCEOLA BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC ("Seller") and TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT LLC and/or assignee ("Buyer"), with respect to the following facts: Seiler is the owner of that certain real property comprising one acre of land located directly north of 300 N. Osceola Avenue along with all • improvements, thereon (rental homes, with leases/tenancies appertaining thereto) (the "Prolmi-ty' ). The complete legal description to be provided with the Commitment for Title Insurance referenced to herein. NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree, covenant, represent, and warrant as follows: 1. AGREEMENT- TO PURCHASE AND SELL. Seller hereby agrees to sell to Buyer and Buyer iereby agrees to purchase from Seller, the Property for a total consideration of $2,750,000.00, In cash at Closing. in addition to the real property, the sale price shall Include any and all reservations and deposits on units to be constructed on the Property, all Improvements, architectural drawings, engineering work products, survey, phase one environmental report, development approvals from the City of Clearwater, and other items of` similar nature that have been created by way of the work In contemplation of the development of the Property. Any such items, materials and worlK shall be delivered free of claims or encumbrances; Seiler • shall execute an indemnification agreement at Closing in favor of Buyer with regard to same. 2. BROW of 205 i S. Within 3 business days after mutual acceptance of this agreement, the parties hereto agree to open an escrow with Fidelity National Title In:;urance Co, Tampa Main Office ("Escrow Holder") to effectuate the hen.Nn transaction, Buyer shall deliver a check in the amount of $50,000 (the "I5amest Money Deposit") made payable-to Escrow Holder, who shall deposit i:he check into an Interest bearing account with Interest to i accrue to the Buyer. This Agreement shall constitute Escrow and Closing Instructions to Escrow Holder, who shall also act as Closing Agent and Title Insurer for this tra,isaction, and where used herein, Escrow Holder is deemed Closing Agent. 3. Q.OSING. The Closing shall occur ten (10) days after the satisfaction of the contingencies set forth in Paragraph4 A through C (the "Close of Escrow" or "Closiny') or sooner by mutual written agreement. The Buyer may extend the Closing by 30 days upon giving written notice to Seller ten (10) days Prior to the initial Closing date, and concurrently depositing an • ORIGINAL • 03!12/2004 04:31 S • PAGE 02 ORIGINAL additional $50,000 Earnest Money beposit into the Escrow account. Buyer's total Earnest Money Deposit shall become non-refundable 60 days following the Effective Date hereof. `A. At or prior to the Closing, Buyer shall deliver to the Closing Agent: 1, a wire transfer for the cash portion of the consideration, less Buyer's deposit in the escrow and the interest earned thereon, increased by all prorations and adjustments in Seller's favor and decreased . by all prorations and adjustments in Buyer's favor together with the Buyer's entire share of the costs and charges of the escrow. B. Not less than two working days prior to Closing, Seller shall deliver to the Escrow Holder: 1. a .pedal Warranty. Deed conveying marketable title to the Property, executed and acknowledged by Seller in recordable form if. an Owner's standard Title Insurance Policy, (the "Titre Policy") to be provided at Buyer's expense, issued by the Title Insurer Insuring tide vested In Buyer Ir° the amount of the purchase price of the property subject to (a) the lien for real property taxes for the current tax year not then due i and payable (b) those covenants, conditions and restrictions, easements, and i rights of way of record. Buyer may elect extended coverage under the title policy and will be responsible for any additional charges associated therewith. w III. an affidavit in accordance with Internal Revenue Code 1445 i certifying that Sel er is not a foreign person subject to the withholding rules i of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (the "FIRPTA Affidavit'); iv. an affidavit stating that no work has been performed on the Property that would entitle any person or entity to record any mechanic's or i material man's lien against the property, (the "Mechanics Lien Affidavit"). C. At the Closing the Closing Agent shall: I. prorate, as of the Closing date, with Buyer to be credited for the date of Closing, each of the following.: Property taxes based upon the w latest available tai: bill, rents from the rental homes on the Property; ii. deliver to Seller the cash portion of the consideration less Seller's share of cl.xing costs and adjustments in the Seller's favor. ?? III. deliver to Buyer the Title Policy (or cause the actual policy to be delivered to Buyer within fifteen (1S) business days), the FIRPTA Affidavit, and Mechanics Lien Affidavit. D. Closing Costs. The parties agree the Seller shall pay for the cost of any corrective documents required for marketable title. Other costs are set forth below: filler Buyer Standard Title Insurance Policy Lender's Title Insurance Policy (if any) Deed Doc Stamps Mortgage & Note Stamps/fees (it any) • Recording of Deed Recording of Mortgage (if any) 1/2 Escrow Vee 1/2 Escrow Fee - - - ORIGINAL ?? ?I 03/1.2/2004 PAGE 03 • JUN 09 26505 ORIGINAL 4. ONTINGE NCIF.S: B yer's0bto?'h?'tt purchase the Property is contingent upon the written fulfillment and/or Buyer's written approval, at Buyer's sole discretion, of each of the following: A. Buyer's written waiver or satisfaction of the following, within 60 days from mutual acceptance, by Seller and Buyer, of this agreement. 1. a physical examination of the Property, Inciuding but not limited to access to all Environmental report (Buyer's responsibility), } geological reports(Buyer's responsibility), all existing plans, the most recent property tax bills., copies of notices from govemmental offices received concerning the property and all other documents relating to the property, In Seller's possession. 11. a ?:ontractor's inspection and other Inspections Buyer deems appropriate, a feasibility study and other documentation as Buyer may reasonably request, If any. Ill. kasibility for development of the Property for up to SO dwelling units. Seller agree!; to provide Buyer with access to the Property, records, and materials to conduct such inspections and testing. All Inspections and testing shall be conductec' at Buyer's sole cost and expense. B. Within 10, days after the Effective Date, Seller shall cause to be delivered to the Buyer a current ALTA Commitment for 'T'itle Insurance, • provided by Escrow Holder together with copies of all liens, easements, claims, encumb*ances, rights-of-way, encroachments, reservations, restrictions, and any other matters affecting the Subject Property. Buyer shall have 10 days from the receipt of all of the foregoing Information in r which to examine the Commitment for Title Insurance and to specify to Seller . In writing those items which are title objections. Seller, at Seller's sole lip discretion, shall Attempt to remove same and deliver within 10 days of Buyer's written notification of Seller's intent. If Seller Is unable or decides • not to cure the objections of Buyer, Buyer shall have the option, within 10 0 days of Seller's ncltification, to proceed with the purchase as outlined in this Agreement, or in the altemative, shall have the right to refuse to proceed with the purchase as outlined herein, and upon notification of Seller of said • election, this Agreement shall become null and void.. Buyer's failure to notify Seller within the1 a day time period shall be deemed Buyer's approval and acceptance. C. Within 10 days after the Effective Date, Seller shall provide to • Buyer are existing survey of the Property. Buyer shall have 10 days from receipt of the survey to specify to Seller in writing those items which appear to be unacceptable:. Any such exceptions shall be treated as a title defect as set forth in ParagR"aph 4.8. above and remedied in the same fashion as set • forth therein. • In the event that ? Buyer disapproves any of the above contingencies, this Agreement shall become null and void, Escrow-holder shall Immediately • refund Buyer's earnest money and the parties shall have no further obligations or liability to one another, • 3 ORIGINAL • 03/12/2004 04:31 PLA1 5. POSSESSI(&. Possession o at Closing JUIN 0 9 f'S}vj ORIGINAL. be delivered to Buyer 6. RFPR - ESEN'CATIONS AND WARRANTIES. The. following representations and warranties are deemed conditions precedent to the Closing. Except as stated herein the property is sold AS IS. A. Seller hereby represents and warrants, to the best of the Seller's knowledge, as follows: I. Seiler will maintain the Property in not less than its current condition, and will not allow any physical or economic deterioration of its condition, through and until the date of Closing; ii, there are no existing water problems or underground soil problems relating to the Property other than those as disclosed In writing by Seiler to Buyer during the contingency period in Paragraph 4 above; Ili. tt' ere are no pending or potential legal or condemnation proceedings again:yt all or any party of the Property; Seller has no knowledge of any notices, violations, or other proceedings (including requiring work, repair, or other faction) relating to the Property, legal, governmental, or otherwise; there are no boundary line encroachments or separation and set- back violations with respect to the Property; Iv. S -Aler shall be responsible for all real estate taxes and assessments prior- to Buyer's ownership of the Property. v. there has been no production, storage, transport, treatment spillage, infiltration, or disposal upon the Property of any toxic or hazardous substances includ ng asbestos and radon, in violation of applicable law, during Seller's ownership of the property. 7. DEFAULT U.2UI0ATE1P DAMAGES. In the event Buyer defaults upon any of Buyer's ob igations herein after the satisfaction of the contingencies described in Paragraph 4 above, Buyer acknowledges that the damages suffered by Seller thereby will be difficult to ascertain with certainty. THEREFORE, BY THEIR INITIALS AT THE END OF THIS PARAGRAPH, BUYER AND SELLER AGREE THAT THE EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT IS. A GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF SUCH DAMAGES AND SAID SUM SHALL BE PROMPTY PAID TO SELLER AS AND FOR LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. SELLER HEREBY AGREES TO AC Ef'T THE EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES ND LAIMS TO SPECIFIC PERFORM ANC THAT SELLER MAY HAVE AGAINST 'Y / BUYE SELLE CO 8. NO1ICE_ Any notice or writing given hereunder shall be delivered by a) depositing a notice or writing contained in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, in the United States Postal System as registered or certified mall nnir,IKI A f- 03/12/2004 04: 313 JUN 0 9 2035 PAGE 05 ORIGINAL. -LAMINI. with return r+ecei p., requested-?sb)-by•overnlght-'express carrier, c) via facsimile transmission, or d) In person. Any such notice so sent shalt be conclusively deerned delivered to and received by the addressee a) upon receipt, or b) in Case of the US mall, forty-eight (48) hours after the deposit, if all of the foregoing conditions of notice shall have been satisfled, and addressed as follows: Buyer: Ben Kugler Triangle Development 133 Candy Lane Palm Harbor, FL. 34683 ORIGINAL P- 727-489-1510; F- 727441-3069 Seller: 0s (A0 Q 9. AUTHORITY, Each person executing this Agreement represents and warrants his authority to do so and that by his signature each of the obligations hereunder become binding upon Seiler and Buyer. If Seller requires ratification by others of Seller's execution hereof, Seller shall provide written evidence of ratification to Buyer within ten business days after the Effective Date hereof. 10. G NERAL PROVISIONS. A. Good Falth. All parties hereby expressly covenant to the deal with each other in good faith regarding all action, decisions, and conduct relating to this agreement. B. Time of the Essence. Time is hereby expressly made of the essence of this Agreement. C. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which counterparts toget ier shall constitute one and the same instrument. D. Construction. This Agreement shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced, and governed by and under the laws and judicial decisions of the State of Florida applicable to agreements made and to be performed in that State. This Agreement is in all respects intended by each party hereto to be deemed and consh acted to have been jointly prepared by the parties and the parties hereby expressly agree that any uncertainty or ambiguity existing herein shall not be interpreted against either of them. Except as expressly limited by this Paragraph, all of the applicable rules of interpretation of contract shall govern the interpretation of any uncertainty or ambiguity. E. Binding on Successors. This Agreement and each and every covenant, condition, and other provisions herein contained shall apply to, be 5 i i • - ??"•`? oavoc loo t i r rrom. Lee rvmeencvn 03/12/2004 04:31 PAGE 06 i nJUN 09 2005 ORIGIN;.;' _ P,1 .?? 0 R I G I N A L binding upon, and inure to the bur2en and rbenefit as may be the case of the respective heirs, administrators, executors, legal representatives, assigns, successors, and agents of the parties hereto. F. Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth the entire agreement or-the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and may be modified or amended only by a written instrument executed by all of the parties hereto. G. Prevailing Party. In the event of any litigation with respect to this Agreement, the party hereto who does not prevail shall be responsible for all costs (e.g., court -=osts, attorney's fees (including upon appeal(s)), damages, etc,) incurred by the prevailing party. H. Facsimile. Copies Acceptable. Buyer and Seller agree that signed facsimile copies stall be binding as though original documents. I. Radon Gas. Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that, when it has accumulated in a building in sufficient quantities, may present health risks to persons w-to are exposed to it over time. Levels of radon that exceed federal and state cuidelines -have been found in buildings in Florida. Additional information regarding radon and radon testlhg may be obtained from the county public health unit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective the date last set forth below. BUYER: By: It's The undersigned Property on thi real estate fee through escrow SELLER: CO. By:_ Date:_ IYs /PMENT, LLC, FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY CO, Date: at %b accepts the foregoing offer and agrees to sell the terms and conditions stated herein. Seiler agrees to pay a in i:he amount of $100,000 to Parkbridge Capital Group, Inc. at the Closing. BAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED L1-ABI1* -- ; - .aU . y 4400 6 ON- 03/12/2004 0 • 46 i • • • • • • • • • • ile -I. 48r.8i: - OOw-4932s-7 u• ORIGINAt RIGINAL ? dry{?y{ i, ,SUN 0 9 2005 ?J"Jr'l,Gr1 • ORIGINAL Addendum "A„ to j y - ` - Td. ORIGINAL Agreement of Purchase and Sale 0i Dated March 12, 2004 Osceola Bay Development, LLC ("Seller") JUN 0 9 Triangle Development, LLC ( "Buyer") T k v "' i • ? _r ? wry' _- ?/ : i r `?: - aa_ ., .` 1. Paragraph I. Agreement To Purchase and Sell. The last sentence of Paragraph 1, which . reads "Any such items, materials and work shall be delivered free of claims or encumbrances, Seller shall execute an indemnification agreement at Closing in favor of Buyer with regard to the same" is deleted. • The following sentence is added: "Seller makes no representations or warranties"_ f the adequacy, reliability or enforceability of the aforesaid items which shall be provided t) the extent the Seller owns and is able to provide them. Seller shall hold Buyer harmless from any costs br claims for payment from any prior work done for Seller prior to the Closing and any such indemnification shall survive the Closing. Seller will provide copies of Reservation Agreements and an accounting of deposits on hand. Buyer shall satisfy itself as to commitments and reservations that the Seller has • procured. At closing, Seller agrees to notify the escrow agent of the change of ownership." 1W 2. Paragraph 6 A.i. is amended to add: "Other than vacating the tenants on the property, • Seller will maintain the Property....." • 3. The Sellers' acceptance paragraph is amended as follows: Reference to commissions to Real Estate Brokers is numbered Paragraph 11. Real Estate Commissions • "11. Real Estate Commissions. Seller agrees to pay at closing, under a separate agreement, areal estate commission to Osceola Bay Realty, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, of which i $100,000.00 shall be paid to Parkbridge Capital Group, Inc. (the "Brokers') Other than stated herein, Buyer and Seller each represent and warrant to the other that there are no other brokerage • commissions or finder's fees payable with respect to the subject tra motion Each party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the other harmless from and against all demands, claims, liabilities, actions, and expenses arising out of the contention by any person or entity that any real estate commission or finders fee other than as specified in this section is payable because of the acts of • such indemnifying party. This section will survive the close of escrow or termination of this Agreement." Dated this a day of March, 2004. • BUYER SELLER. TRIANGLE EVE PMENT, LLC OSCEOLA BAY D VELOPMENT, a Florida L' ' ed bility Company a Nevada Limn bility Company * By: G?0 By: Matrix , LLC, Managing • Mem • l By: Gerald D E burg, C • • :?le Y T COMPANY, LLC - ORIGINAL Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Proof of Ownership Harrison Village (Old Markopoulos property) Title Insurance S Ira JUIN 0 9 205 1 1 rLMI61` 1V TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM l ?J •y • i • • Hpr us 04 UJ:53a off cep Number ARI4GOAN Lisa Shasteen Esq. 813-931-8140 ?tinIp eAL p. 2 AlLT.A. CQMIVMTMENT 200402"S CHICAGO'T)TLE INSL1RA?NCE COMPANY SCHEOUL A EFFetxive Date March 30. 2004 at a.:oo AM' 1. PCMcy or PO&J" to be Issued: OWNERI Pout (ID17-Wj with Ronda adlaim Rm" erect Conau?ft Int~, a FkVIO o0rporebm LOAN POUCt (16174. . ;la, Rortdat?IodtFlcayorrs insured: To Be Oebarmkmd Comm rtt Number 3. To be deoennkte,d ¢. The eatma or interest In the lard described or rdwredto in twa Fortin wnent and oovered herein b Pee Stmple, and tMe thereto Is at ft effec" dais hereof vested In: zsus J M Fjorba mimwuo, Ox to Parcel #1); awfidew Aeitaurars. the-, a F lorkta corporation, (IBS to Parch and s Mae4opoulos (As to Parcel *3) The Land 13 descnnbac! as followw SEE EXHISFT A ORIGINAL ^N rM n JUN 0 9 koRat Tkb O6m'I lV wt -WOU Of k=I*Pegaa InWed In &?ludula A. 4dd? B ctian t, rd 3'-? L 7Ab C*mn?troaat (< of IV km WO adbq w'11 ay txMduba am k?ekdw, wane Wnh WW FrdW a8°a Morp_SW by Aft, tOv in am MOM PaMa. Rpr 03 U4 03:53a Mksa Shasteen, Esq_ 81IP-831-0140 p,3 ORIGINAL Ctnminltment NNmbor CHICAGO-TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SCHEDULE A (corrtinueM Exhibit %A' PARCH ?t c TIw Weft 2/3 d Lot Z Block 2, JONES SUE1OMWON OF MCHOISONS MXTJON TO CLEARWATER HARSOR, ectordkg to ore plat theured ao recorded In Plat Book t. pege.13, of the pudic rer a is 9f 1.10sbprough County. Fkxjda, of wNkh PIMMIeS CountyvMformedYa part af, LESS the NoMhMjW comer and being moue puticulwily due. bad ac folbaa: 9"hmlrg at the Soup went comer of Lot A Biodc 2, of said JONES SUBDIVISION fora Point of BeginNng; thenes Noel W- 23-W west, along the west r,e of said Lot p,10,110 h94 Vence Nordnwoly nWv a curve (sell mw having a radius d4a.00 feat a tangent of 8.07'tees; a Chord of I & lie fvK a chord bearbg North 49.4r4W Easq, a distance of 1598 feet; Itw a Noah Or 41 MW East, afore the North tine of nald Lot 2.41.77 leek tIMM9 8m 00 * 231W East, temw feat; licenceSouth W 4 b6' Wei. 63.96 W to the Point d Eleginr>irrr PARCEL #2c The South 76 feet of Lot 1. Block 2, JONE'S SUBDIVISION OF NIG'FiOLSON S AMMON TO CLEA RWATER HARBOR, according to the plat lhemof recmchW In Plat Book 1. papa M. of the public recd tfs of Hftbonvagh County, Flows. d whkah Phelles Caunry was lontr" a part, togerherwM that certain vaet of lend lying between the West line of the above descnbW land and the End right-aNway line d Oweota Avenue,, tying and being in Pkrellm County, Florida PARCEL d3: ftkw ing at the Sautheag gamer of [tit 1, Black 2, of JONES SUBDIVISION OF NKM SOWS ADDITION TO CI.EARWATE R H1IRWK doea e g to the corrWed map or. plat thered reoon*d In Plat Book 1, pago 13, d the pubic records of.1•1111sborough Canty, Rorkhk dwhk* Pi mkm County war fbmwdy s part: Mint thane North 0, 23'00• West along the East One of Call Lot 1, 157 fg6t fora Pokit of Bsgfning; Vence South 791 24W Weft, 84.28 feet; tbent a Sots) O- 44VW Wa t,12.21 foot; thence Fast, paraUal to the South lino of cold lot MM 10K more or less. to the East line d said l)t; thence Notch along the East One of bald tot, 27 feet more or less. to the Pdr t d Beginning. ORIGINAL J-'N 09 2335 1300-C-7-1 71 _7 1-1 7 1 1 -1 &;Lvoss '' vt1 _ r D ,tlpMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Proof of Ownership Harrison Village (Old Salvation Army site) Affidavit to Authorize Agent ORIGINAL 0.- JUN Q 9 2095 'i t "`L4l4 iii I=r3. 777'--- ° " ..t' f urf 4A. TRIAN13LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER. FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM • • • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINLSMT10N MUNICIPAL SERVICES BURDING. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE. 2° FLOOR PHONE (727)-5624567 FAX (727) 562-4576 1. That Q ambve are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the lbNowing desa bed property- Pi?WmTy -?T VV 1?4? 'Th/cC.vmp z;v -*j e v 6q&z- (Na1ue d?quesQ 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint ,?ffnr,A 1ALL7D14S°LJdi?7W CIA ilK7*VA as snp pegiene or cow documents necessary 4. That this affidavit has been exemied to induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property: 5. That (fte), the undersigned authority, hereby certify the foregoing is true and correct. Pfterrtylol= 0whw STATE OF FLOPJDA, COUM OF P0931M Before ft uc ned, an officer duly commissioned L "7 personalty appeared -? i-? 9 deposes xW says amt heldw ruay wdustnift are oonlen My Commission Expires: S oppocaoun fcxrr?sltlerrlopm?! ro+RewlA aZlnAltNta¢e/lger>t the laws of the State of Florida. on tlris y day of t j 9- 'h e--A? who having been first duty swam of ate airda T31-ftwgwl _ !Y+vxr134 Mri xoat iwu a.30"_ ?+Pti ' ?' 90(11 hZ 4»WV SR 'd'3 196SOM J' NOS MOD dN '• tayuttgM•0 or?PlDd T. • ;; t_.? 1? 1i?11 ??tS:r 7 ^r , ? r5:7 ORIGINAL 2- That this p op&V consades the property for which a request for a OF PiNEL Tov0m 1 -OF N10FM WAY LINE COUNTY. FLORIQ, AND A PORTION OF GOVERPAAENT LOT 4 IN SECTION 9, OF OSCEOLA AVENUE (A 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE N00'05'14" 1N, ALONG PARCEL 2 LOTS A & B OF BERGENS REPLAT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 25, PAGE 41, PUBLIC RECORDS OF P04EU AS COUNTY, FLORIDA- TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 1/3 OF LO i THE WEST 113 OF LOT 3 OF JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO T 2, AND CLEARWATER HARBOR. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK H1, PAGE 13, PUBLIC RECORDS OF H LLSBOROUGH XXXJNTY, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART, ALSO TOGETHER WITH A VACATED ALLEY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 7546, PAGE 807 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY ALL LYING IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; • BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT B OF SAID BERGENS REPLAT: THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (A 55 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY) AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS A AND B OF SAID BERGENS REPLAT, A DISTANCE OF 179.99 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JONES STREET: THENCE N894945'W, ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID JONES STREET AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT A AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE EAST 1/3 OF LOT 2 AND THE WEST 1/3 OF LOT 3 OF SAID JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, A DISTANCE OF 186.65 FEET: THENCE NORTH, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST 1/3 OF LOT 2, JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, A DISTANCE OF 179.99 FEET: THENCE O S89'49'4TE, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH, A DISTANCE OF 12.47 FEET; 9THENCE S89'58'020E, A DISTANCE OF 161.65 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE: THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 12.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 1 C ORIGINAL EXHIBIT uA" Legal Description ORIGINAL 1 LE ip JUA f19 20 5 LOTS 1 THROUGH 7 AND THE 10 FOOT ALLEY LYING WEST OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 3 of A.B. & JENNIE CATES SUBDMSION, AS RJECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 64, PUBLIC RECORDS P 29 SOtRK RANGE 15 EAST. BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7 OF SAID A_B & JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISIOR NWSM'm E. ALONG TI4E SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF GEORGIA STREET (A 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY), A DISTANCE OF 211.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AVEIlUE (A 55 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE SOUTH, ALONG D WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 37:16 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID T ( WAY LINE N89'58VTW, A DISTANCE OF 211.11 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 7 OF SAID A.B. & JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 333.12 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater Proof of Ownership Island Yew (Old Rahddert property, 312-404 N Osceola) Affidavit to Authorize Agent ORIGINAL i ' vJ • i JUN 0 9 2005 TRIAN13LE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOPTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 0 0 ORIGINAL CITY OF CLE.A_RWATER AFFIDAVIT TO AUMOIUZE AGENT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMn ISTRATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE. 2" PLC= PRONE M71-5022.1567 M (an SQ-1576 (N,ma pmp" ownnmj 1. That (I arn/we are) the owner(s) and record dge holder(s) of the followlnp deacrlhed property-, 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a requestlor a: /t? G ?u1 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (doors/do) (appoint '1k /A A19 Z Oa Int.taWn an-me) ID MLOWW" Pwuo? nr Dolor dOCUM ` U rCO3521V n fifth Y,Cf PWWJarti 4. That this at ldevlt has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to connidar and ac8 on the above described property-. 5_ That (Uwe), the underrnl®nod authority,'hereby c =.e (n Dingo and con-act- awns STATE OF FLOMOLA. aotmrr ON ?secu.As day of 8oforo me the u,d,,ralgnsd. an Omc2r duly min-J-[ nod by "'a I'rv'a of fha 8tau of Fbrldn, on GIs b? ffnt *00m ?jQ/G Zc?OS' poraenoIN aPPoand C' "n 'GE k• ,ef???7? •2 wtm hovtrs9 ?u!/ dopwea and coy tthoi holMa fully unooacnnds tna oontants of tho affid.vlc Max haM"o m1l, ined. A!a Pub py Commission EapinaW st a Vacntlan rarrno/devanDm.rx r?lw Martha Jean Foster Commission # 00365389 :q• Expires November 19, 2008 ?dadad Tivy Fein - kie.raeu. k-r- e00.3a&Mg l j l f JUN 09 Lgr- I I C"' A, LO r. (A "Ss o• o«.«v Lac "MI 0 0 ORIGINAL WHITE PAPER 0a0ba' 7009, uPdaled April 2005 On New Automated Parking Garages Harrison Village and Island View Clearwater, Florida By Robotic ParkingTM Systems For Triangle Development, LLC Section A Robotic Parking System Synopsis Section B Summary of Robotic Parking Benefits U J1 r" Section C Frequently Asked Questions Section D The Hoboken, N] Robotic Garage Robotic Parking'" Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 1 ORIGINAL. Section A Robotic Parking System Synopsis Reliability As is true for anything man made in this universe, it is prone to fail. The only answer known to date to successfully overcome • this is to apply the philosophy of the "one out of two failure". It doesn't mean just simply installing two motors on any single machine; it means the provision of two identical machines, which can take over from one another and accomplish the same . task at any time for any location. ' Robotic Parking Technology has proven to be extremely reliable in the operation of its Hoboken facility with over 130,000 • parking transactions to date: the average retrieval time over these 130,000 transactions was 149 seconds, which also counts for instances when as many as ten patrons arrived simultaneously to retrieve their vehicles. • On the storage side, this particular configuration is capable of receiving the next vehicle at the same Entry/Exit Station (EES) within 50 seconds after the previous patron has initiated the storage process. These numbers speak reliability and efficiency. After over two years of successful operation the questions of "does it work?" or "what happens if something breaks?" have been answered to the complete satisfaction of the patrons. AND: in these over 700 days of this 24/7 operation, there was not • one single hour where no cars were stored or retrieved! A main criterion for reliability is detection and prevention; these are the diagnostics and the maintenance of the system. With a • propef maintenance contract in place and a hot line with 24/7 coverage and a short response time, this technology is as reliable as it can be made. The system interface provides automatic reports about runtimes, necessary maintenance checks • and many more features to keep the system reliability up. A note: During the New York City black out in August of 2003, the Robotic Parking Facility was the only • operating garage in the city - the emergency generator provided the only lights and operation on the block. The garage operated at full capacity without interruption. • The robotic parking garages proposed for Harrison Village and Island View combine standard mechanical technology with advanced automation technology, exactly as used in large automobile assembly lines like GM, Ford, and Mercedes. The • uniqueness of the system lies in the modularity and flexibility of the system components, and in the seamless integration with the latest software platforms. • A Brief History Initially the mechanical garage concept did not catch on in the US. primarily because there was plenty of land and parking • space. In Europe, Asia and Japan however, where land is scarce, hundreds of mechanical garages were built from the mid- 50's. Almost all are still in operation. The largest of these garages, accommodating 849 cars, is an underground garage built • by the former Krupp Manufacturing Company. • The first automated garage was built by Krupp in 1958 in the Deutsche Bank in Munich. This system is still serving the patrons to date with its original installed parts. After over 45 years of continued operation. • Another Krupp example is the underground garage at the Hotel Lotte in Seoul. This garage was built in 1984 by Krupp and has been operating since with over 1,200,000 parking operations per year, which translates to over 3,000 transactions per day. The garage proposed for this development is an advancement of the technology applied by Krupp in Germany. The • Hoboken Garage is a stellar example of this. The first mechanical garage in the USA, built in Cincinnati in 1932, accommodated nearly 400 cars and used a converted elevator system to hoist individual vehicles from a central receiving area to one of its 24 floors. Once at the appropriate floor, dollies and/or a live attendant pushed the vehicle into its parking space. This garage operated every day until it closed in 1979. Most of these early garages were demolished to make room for new buildings; two "classics" remain in service in New York City. Prime Advantages of the Robotic Parking Systems Design This patented design separates all three movements (in and out, up and down, back and forth down the aisles)and has them • handled by individual intelligent components with true redundancy. No single failure will ever result in the garage becoming • inoperable. t • Robotic Parkingm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 -Page 2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • E ? ORIGINAL This technology allows for two to three times the amount of cars to be parked in the same space/volume of a conventional garage. Numerous secondary advantages such as enhanced safety, security and environmental benefits are outlined below. Parking Procedure The following steps happen when you park a car. • You drive your vehicle into an arrival station and park it; • After swiping a credit card, or using an EZ Pass, a central computer system directs a moveable carrier (pallet) to the arrival station; • The pallet and the vehicle are moved from the arrival station to a lift; • When the lift reaches the properly designated parking level, the pallet and the vehicle are transferred to the parking slot designated by the computer. Retrieval of the pallet and the vehicle is accomplished by simply reversing the procedure. At no time during the process does the vehicle leave the pallet to which it was initially assigned. Section B Summary of Robotic Parking Benefits Less Waiting Time The system is designed to make multiple storage and retrieval activities at the same time. Typical dwell times (between each parking cycle) are between 20 and 40 seconds. This results in a throughput capability of about 40 to 50 vehicles per hour at each Entry/Exit Station (EES). The Harrison Village garage will have four EES's, and the Island View garage will have two. Both will be accessed off Osceola Avenue. No Backing Out This is a better service than conventional valet service due to the fact that no one ever drives or even touches the car from the time the driver leaves it until it is returned. While inside the facility all cars are turned 180 degrees so the patrons never have to back their cars out. • No Stacking Back into the Street The design for the Harrison Village location especially takes into consideration the sensitivity to direct access onto the street. • Four Entry/Exit Stations are provided into the garage at this location. Traffic Analysis reveals that these will be able to handle the heaviest traffic flow without causing any backup. In the extremely unlikely event of system failure or • delay the traffic will be able to bypass the garage entry entirely and smoothly rejoin the traffic flow. • Reduced Traffic Congestion • As an interesting note, the garage offers exactly what Department of Transportation (DOT) research has found, that over 50% • of the traffic in a typical downtown is simply on the road circling the block and searching for a parking space. As the garage will be built in a downtown location where a conventional garage could not fit, this will drastically reduce traffic in • downtown, resulting in less congestion, noise and nuisance, and also reducing the waste of precious space. • Reduction of Emissions No cars running, no emissions. A car driving up a ramp in a conventional garage in search of a parking place has about the • same amount of toxic emissions as a car driving on the highway at 70 - 80 mph. Based on EPA data, it was found a 500 car • garage of this type saves over 6,000 gallons of gasoline and eliminates toxic emissions of 1,000 pounds of hydrocarbons, 3.5 tons of carbon monoxide, 500 pounds of nitrogen oxides and over 60 tons of carbon dioxide on a yearly basis. • Environmentally Clean • Reduces noise and air pollution; self-cleaning; separates oil and water for environmentally sensitive disposal. Oil drips • Pallets are the metal trays you drive onto when you park your car. They catch any oil, acid or salt water drips from cars. As the car is transported around the garage on its pallet and never leaves it until you drive it out again, this guarantees that no machinery ever touches any vehicle. And drips from cars or machinery or cars above it can never touch your car. Robotic Parking"' Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 3 ,L' • ORIGINAL Traffic Flow Benefit • Cars enter and exit from the main street into the facility and exit the same way. System Access • The system offers several possibilities: Monthly users may find an "EZ pass" (or "$unPass'? is most efficient, while visitors may simply swipe a credit card. The system can also retrieve owners' cars from the facility by remotely dialing into the system • computer via a phone line. System Hotline Robotic Parking Systems installs a hotline at its headquarters and GE for remote 24 hours/7 days access with a swift response time. • Training Robotic Parking Systems provides on-site training for owner's personnel. System Maintenance Robotic Parking Systems performs diagnostics and maintenance with trained personnel on site. The operation functions on a • 24/7 basis. System Redundancy The Robotic Parking System is triple redundant: 1. Every machine has redundant components inherent in it. In addition, there are at least two machines of each kind • installed, and either can perform the same task. 2. The computer system is totally redundant itself. If one server fails, the second automatically takes over and as it has the same storage configuration data, no difference will be noticed. • 3. An emergency power generator takes care of power outages. • System Monitoring The Robotic Parking system can also monitor, watch or operate the system remotely from any location. CIMPLICITY software allows for the creation of reports, at any given time. The extensive diagnostic capability also makes it possible to • troubleshoot locally or remotely, and enables the performance of preventive diagnostics - all in real time. • Service Warranty A system warranty, maintenance contract and a hotline are in place to ensure continued operation of the system in any eventuality. Trained technicians are available to operate the system and provide other auxiliary services as needed or wanted. • A Manned System According to National and International Standards, a public automated parking facility needs to be manned by a manufacturer-trained operator during opening hours. This service is performed by Robotic Parking Systems. This application can also utilize a valet service, where a valet will do the actual parking for the client. • Integrated Car Wash • If desired, Robotic Parking Systems can easily integrate an automated brushless carwash into the system. • Loading/ Unloading Bays Two separate bays will be provided where cars can be shuttled, away from the main vehicular flow. These bays will be accessible via doors to the residential area. These bays can be used for any loading unloading activity, or any action • that might take longer and would clog up the regular Entry/Exit Stations, such as cleaning or the like. • Storage Use Parking spaces not used for parking can be used as convenient storage spaces. For the amount of storage needed, pallets can • be converted into containers (7'x19'x7J and placed in the same parking slots as for cars. The loading and unloading of the containers is performed adjacent the terminal area, but in a location that will not disturb vehicular traffic. • Security To ensure no accidental or malicious access into the parking facility, we install heart beat detectors in the EES area. Technology is also available to check the cars for explosives and narcotics before entering the facility. Robotic Parking"' Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005_- Page 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 *ORIGINAL Life Safety Issues A fire sprinkler system is provided inside the enclosed garage. Lighting is for maintenance purposes only and mechanical ventilation is not necessary since engines do not run inside the facility. Natural ventilation is provided by the installation of louvers in the roof. Maintenance Protocol Robotic Parking Systems but it utilizes sophisticated diagnostic tools to help maintain a high level of uptime. The system records every rotation of any wheel, bearing, gearbox and motor. Any needed maintenance is reported immediately to the online service department immediately. Section C Frequently Asked Questions QUESTION Does the Automated Parking System provide true reliability? ANSWER As evidenced with the installation in Hoboken there was zero downtime in the operation over the last more than two years. True redundancy of the entire system ensures uptime of the operation any time: redundant machinery, redundant electronics including servers and generator in place. The System to be installed in the project is the same as installed and operating in Hoboken. As these projects are located in Clearwater, the headquarters of Robotic Parking Systems, a natural special attention is ensured by the company. Further, with the operators on site on a 24/7 basis as well as the on-line diagnostic system in place, the observation of the system is guaranteed to the degree that any early warning signals will be taken care of immediately; so it can be stated that the parking facility will be operational at all times. Please compare as well the article in the September 2004 issue of the National Parking Association. QUESTION How is peak traffic handled? ANSWER The traffic study results in a peak traffic of 58 cars in and 56 cars out for the peak hour for the garage. The system configuration as designed for the project has a capacity of 120 vehicles in a ONE directional flow. As the traffic study shows, the peak traffic is equally distributed for in and out traffic; therefore the capacity of the system for a bidirectional flow is much higher than required. Real examples of the garage in Hoboken shows a peak traffic handling of 15 cars in a one directional traffic in 7 minutes. QUESTION How are traffic patterns affected? ANSWER In/Out traffic from Osceola Avenue is guided by a 'right in' and a 'right out' only pattern. No cross traffic can occur, therefore ensuring a smooth traffic flow in and out of Osceola Avenue. In any unlikely case of traffic overflow the traffic will be redirected seamlessly back to Osceola Ave. Consideration for pedestrians is not different than in any other garage entrance and exit lanes. Signage is extensive and can be made interactive. Overall traffic guidance is directed by traffic lights at strategic points of entry. Separate spaces for loading and unloading of vehicles are created outside as well as inside the actual parking facility. These will not influence the traffic flow in and out of the garage. QUESTION How is the system used? ANSWER A user's manual will be freely available showing how the patrons in Hoboken became used to the automated parking facility. Please also compare the NPA article (attached) as to the patron dwell times. J rRobotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 - Page 6 0 0 • • 0 r 0 • Section D The Hoboken, N7 Robotic Garage 0 ORIGINAL The following is an article from The New York Times, about the first US. automated parking facility built three years ago in Hoboken, NJ. Spade-Age Garages That Save Space By ANTOINETTE MARTIN The New York Times The Hoboken municipal parking garage that opened its robotically controlled doors last year displays a stunning agility . It lifts and carries cars about on computer controlled steel pallets as if they were delicate ballerinas, moving with precision and speed inside a structure that is remarkably compact. While performance tests are still going on, the garage is limited to operating at two- thirds of its full capacity. When all systems are going, however, it will park 314 cars on just a 100-by- 100-foot lot. The seven-level garage is 56 feet high, not much higher than the four-story row houses that are its neighbors 'This is amazingly proficient use of space," commented Darius Sollohub, a New Jersey Institute of Technology professor who studies parking and urban land use. '7t may provide one of the solutions to the most important conflict In urban design: where do you put all the cars in environments where car volume is high and space /s at a premium': 'An automated garage typically takes only about half as much precious real estate as a con ventional ramped garage to handle the same number of cars, or even more. That is why in European and Asian cities, the automatic garage was long ago anointed as the best solution. ',' Mr. Sollohub said. The Hoboken sbucture, designed by Gerhard Haag, an engineer and architect bom in Germany, where ramped garages are rare and automatic garages common, is a first-of-its-kind /n the United States The Hoboken garage belongs to a new generation of fully automated garages that parking industry specialists say is generating new interest. There are 67 American cities, including Manhattan, where his company is currently discussing proposals Hoboken 's Garden Street Garage is completely computerized, with two identical elevator systems that are able to move simultaneously in both vertical and horizontal directions and communicate with each other by wireless transmitters The garage s computer figures out which of the hundreds of spaces in the building a vehicle should occupy, and then delivers it there untouched by human hands. A monthly parker pulls into one of four driveways at the redbrick building on Garden Street, which on the outside looks pretty much like a group of Hoboken row houses The driver powers the car forward a few yards onto a steel pallet, maneuvering the wheels between guardrails as instructions appear on an LED. signboard about correct alignment, then turns off the engine and gets out Alter locking the car, the Parker swipes a card in front of a magnetic reader, and while the sign on the wall is flashing a reminder to step back, automatic elevator doors close around the car and rt /s whisked to a computer assigned slot. The computer factors in the vehicle's size when making an assignment, putting larger SUV's on lower levels It also takes into account the driver's schedule on previous vlslts, putting vehicles whose owners enter and exit frequently in the slots that the system can most easily access 7AUN r, 3 Robotic Parking' Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April-2005 - Page 7 -J • TJRIGINAL When the owner returns for the car and swipes the card again, the process begins in reverse. Within seconds, another electronic sign announces at which bay the car will appear, still on the pallet where the Parker placed it. In its first year of operation, according to the computer records, the average wait to retrieve a car was 2.5 minutes Press (To view video clips, including a news report from CNN, please visit www.roboticparking.com.) Robotic Parking is very pleased to announce the one-year anniversary of the opening of the first modular, fully automated parking system in the US located in Hoboken, NJ! While the system was operating fully automated as early as May of 2002, the first patron drove his car into the garage in October 2002. As best summed up by the city official involved in this project from the beginning: "We're pleased to say we have very happy patrons at the automated parking facility" -JoAnn Serrano, Executive Director of Hoboken Parking Utility "The positive impact on the community has been significant. The customers have experienced great relief from the anxiety. of having to find a parking spot. They enjoy the tremendous convenience of a parking facility nearby with all ground level access Additionally, they love the security aspect. They never have to worry about their car being stolen or vandalized. The neighbors in the immediate area have been very pleased with the quietness of the system and the greatly reduced double parking on the streets" -Michael Cricco, Councilman And others... ".. the Hoboken garage displays a stunning agility - it lifts and carries cars about on computer-controlled steel pallets as if they were delicate ballerinas, moving with precision and speed inside a structure that is remarkably compact. New York Times "...it's amazing, a thing of the future. " Ann Serrano, Exec. Dir. Hoboken Parking Authority "...When you return... no guesswork about where you parked it, no strange nicks, dents or scratches... and no parking attendant to tip. " ABC World News Tonight "..For drivers leaving or retrieving their cars at a parking garage, it's a dream; no exhaust fumes, no strange nicks or swatches appearing... " Wall Street Journal ..I want to express our extreme pleasure and thanks:.. we were thoroughly impressed and satisfied that it was one of the few things we've seen that shows off the 20' Century technology. " Art Schwotzer - Chairman Crossgates Development ".., one of the most intelligent inventions of the 20"' century AAA World Magazines Robotic ParkingTm Systems - Triangle Development - Harrison Village & Island View - April 2005 Page 1 r .?? _ 0 0 ORIGINAL Tr 1., g1e - DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT For Ju'.t. ri g 7a 5 400 JONES STREET Being NEW COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDO DEVELOPMENT AT 302, 304, 308, 312, 314, 400, 404 AND 303, 309 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE; 400, 410 JONES STREET AND 410 N. FORT HARRISON, DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER Submission to the DRC, 28th April 2005 REPLY TO WRITTEN COMMENTS OF 2 JUNE 2005 Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 2, 2005 - Page 15 1. rm not sure the math is working on page two of 33 with regard to the ratio figures on the bottom of the page. I think the original ratio was for 24% not 31 %; Correct, this was a math error. See Application. 3. The math appears incorrect in the narrative on page two of 33 with regard to the number of units proposed for Island View - 116 + 143 + 40 = 299 not 279. 299 + 45 = 344 not 324. Although 279 + 45 does equal 324 so I'll assume that the total number of desired units for Island View is 279 and there's a tpyo somewhere in the fromula; Total unit count is 324. Island View is 116 +143 + 20 = 249. Harrison Village is 45. 4. Clarify the amount of property lost from the project and gained to the project (I figure it a loss of about 12,000 sq.ft. and a gain of about 78,426 sq.ft.; Yes. 6 . It does not appear that there will be any surface parking on the Island View parcel. Is this true?' Yes. All parking, including guest parking, occurs within the Robotic Parking facility. 8. It looks like there are two driveways for the parking garage - one way in and one way out plus two additional drives for drop off- am I (reading this correctly? TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANOLEOEVELOPMENT.COM 1 ?F 3 IN ORIGINAL T li 2 i DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater The accesses (called Entry/Exit Stations) to the robotic Parking are bi-directional. In other words traffic enters and exits, into and from, the same place. Traffic flow is handled by signage (red and green lights). There is an additional drop-off driveway at each entrance. 9. Clarify what the garage doors are doing on the east facade of Island View and how they operate in context of site circulation. The "garage doors" in the drawing are actually the enclosures for the Robotic parking Entry/Exit Stations. They are set well back from Osceola, about 50 ft, from the street. The only really feasible access to the site is off Osceola. 10. Is there a way to better treat the center part of the six story connector between the north and south towers on Island View. It feels like it should be the pivot point between the two towers but it feels like it got a little lost; This has been noted and addressed. See attached drawings. 11 . Can we more forcefully address the entrances for the north and south towers for Island View - the building as a whole is a grand building but there don't seem to be grand entrances; This has been noted and addressed. See attached drawings. 12 How is solid waste handled on the site - it appears that all solid waste for both portions of the project end up at two dumpsters and two compactors at the southeast corner of Island View; Yes. This is a relatively central location, away from main entrances but still easily accessible to the Guys from Solid Waste. We have met with them and the location and layout have their preliminary blessing. 14 . Provide a breakdown between retail and office space; Not allocated as yet. 15. Clarify where the retail spaces are accessed - I assume off North Fort Harrison Avenue but also from Georgia and Jones Streets?; Access is possible from all of the above streets, as well as the north and south ends of Osceola. Door locations will be finalized as tenant requirements become known. 16 . Clarify how the residential units are accessed from Georgia and Jones Streets; The main entrance and elevators are located centrally on Osceola. Secondary (stair) access is from the either of the two arcades that cross the block from Fort Harrison to Osceola, at the north and south ends of the building. Additionally, the ground floor residential units on Osceola will have street level access. 17 . Where will employees for the retail businesses park; Allocation will be made in the Island View Robotic Parking facility. .? I TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC - _ _i?--- - ?, _^ 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755P'_% TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANGLEDEVELORM.ENT::COM?, , 2OF3 ORIGINAL T. gle DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater 19. Clarify that the main entrances to the dwelling units along North Osceola Avenue "face" North Osceola Avenue by providing proper front doors; This has been complied with. See attached drawings. 20. There doesn't seem to be a great deal of loading/unloading/drop-off area for Harrison Village. Clarify how people will move into the building with regard to parking moving trucks and the like; More laybys have been provided. See Site and Streetscape layouts. 21 . This is to confirm that the clubhouse located on Island View be used by residents of just Island View; Yes, exclusively. Harrison Village will have its own facilities, including a rooftop pool, barbecue area and gazebo for the exclusive use of the renters at Harrison Village. 23 . What prices with the units be going for?; From $275,000 for a non-water-facing one-bedroom unit to $2m for a double penthouse. The average is in the $600k range. 24. Clarify the process and timing of the vacation and realignment of North Osceola Avenue. Also, clarify that the realigned North Osceola Avenue will be a City street and not simply an easement Briefly (this is the subject of rather a long evolution), a new eastern Osceola will be constructed, services and all, to the point just before asphalting is done. This will be available for use by Emergency services only. It will be gated at either end and be kept free of construction equipment and materials, as the Harrison Village site will be used for the initial staging of the construction for the Island View project. (This staging is possible because the construction process on the smaller Harrison Village building will be much faster than Island View. Harrison Village will start later and finish at the same time as Island View.) At the same time as the full Island View and Harrison Village construction is completed, the new Osceola will be finished and opened. The vacation and dedication processes will run concurrently with the approval process. 25. Clarify the existing width of North Osceola (I figure it to be about 40ft right-of -way and 20 ft of pavement) Clarify the proposed North Osceola right-of -way and paving width; Existing North Osceola is 40ft right-of-way and 20ft pavement. New North Osceola is 50ft right-of-way and 40 ft pavement. Two dangerous bends will also be removed. 29. Will a new CD on the robotic parking be submitted to refresh the CDB members' memory;_ ' Yes. t< , .3 1 „ I 'N .x- TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOC@TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 3 OF 3 4 a 0 ORIGINAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE - PERMIT APPLICATION , N Y SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER " MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 2379 BROAD STREET • BROOKSVILLE, FL 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 OR FLORIDA WATS 1 (800) 423-1476 FOR AGENCY :USE, ONLY. ACOE Application # DEP/WMD Application # Date Received Date Received Proposed Project Latitude o Fee Received $ Proposed Project Longitude Fee Receipt # SECTION A PART 1: Are any of the activities described in this application proposed to occur in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters? ? yes Ono Is this application being filed by or on behalf of an entity eligible for a fee reduction? ? yes sdno PART 2: A. Type of Environmental Resource Permit Requested (check at least one) ? Noticed General - include information requested in Section B. ? Standard General (single family dwelling)-include information requested in Sections C and D. Q/ Standard General (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Standard General (minor systems) - include information requested in Sections C and H. ? Standard General (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I. ? Individual (single family dwelling) - include information requested in Sections C and D. ? Individual (all other projects) - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Individual (borrow pits) - include information requested in Sections C and I. ? Conceptual - include information requested in Sections C and E. ? Mitigation Bank (construction) - include information requested in Section C and F. (If the proposed mitigation bank involves the construction of a surface water management system requiring another permit listed above, check the appropriate box and submit the information requested by the applicable section.) ? Mitigation Bank (conceptual) - include information requested in Section C and F. B. Type of activity for which you are applying (check at least one) 11 Construction or operation of a new system, including dredging or filling in, on or over wetlands and other surface waters. (If reapplying for an expired, denied or withdrawn permit/ application, please provide previous permit ? Alteration or operation of an existing system which was not previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. ? Modification of a system previously permitted by SWFWMD or DEP. Provide previous permit # and check applicable modification type. ? Alteration of a system ? Extension of permit duration ? Abandonment of a system ? Construction of additional phases of a system ? Removal of a system C. Are you requesting authorization to use State Owned Submerged Lands. ? yes 1Vno If yes, include the information requested in Section G. D. For activities in, on or over wetlands or other surface waters, check type of federal dredge and fill permit requested: ? Individual ? Programmatic General ? General ? Nationwide ? Not Applicable E. Are you claiming to qualify for an exemption? oyes ? no If yes, provide rule number if known FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A Page 1 of 5 Click here to reset "For Agency Use Only." a 0 ORIGINAL PART 3: A. OWNER(S) OF LAND B. APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) NAME NAME Ben Kugler COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE Triangle Development, LLC, President & CEO ADDRESS ADDRESS 411 Cleveland St. CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Clearwater, FL 33755 TELEPHONE (727) 446-7354 TELEPHONE ( ) FAX (727) 446-7531 FAX ( ) C. AGENT AUTHORIZED TO SECURE PERMIT (IF D. CONSULTANT (IF DIFFERENT FROM AN AGENT IS USED) AGENT) NAME NAME Keith Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. COMPANY AND TITLE COMPANY AND TITLE Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc, President ADDRESS ADDRESS 701 Enterprise Road, E., Suite 404 CITY, STATE, ZIP CITY, STATE, ZIP Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 TELEPHONE ( ) TELEPHONE (727 ) 793-9888 FAX ( ) FAX (727 ) 793--985 PART 4: PROJECT INFORMATION A. Name of project, including phase if applicable: Harrison Village B. Is this application for part of a multi-phase project? • • yes d• no C. Total applicant-owned area contiguous to the project: 4.97 acres D. Total project area for which a permit is sought:4.97 acres E. Total impervious area for which a permit is sought: 2.46 acres F. Total area (metric equivalent for federally funded projects) of work in, on, or over wetlands or other surface waters: 0.00 acres or square feet (_hectares or square meters) G. Total number of new boat slips proposed: 0 FORM 547.27/ERP(8-94)A Page 2 of 5 (? +a U12] 0 ORIGINAL PART 5: PROJECT LOCATION (use additional sheets, if needed) County(ies) Pinellas Section(s) 09 Township 29 Section(s) Township Land Grant name, if applicable Tax Parcel Identification Number Street address, road, or other location Osceola Avenue City, Zip Code, if applicable Range Range PART 6: DESCRIBE IN GENERAL TERMS THE PROPOSED PROJECT, SYSTEM, OR ACTIVITY. Construction of a multi use residential, office and retail project, Relocation of Osceola Avenue, and construction of a normally dry stormwater treatment pond. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 3 of 5 4b V ORIGINAL PART 7: A. If there have been any pre-application meetings for the proposed project, with regulatory staff, please list the date(s), location(s), and names of key staff and project representatives. Date(s) Location(s) Names B. Please identify by number any MSSW/WRM (dredge & fill)/ERP/ACOE permits or applications pending, issued or denied and any related enforcement actions at the proposed project site. Agency Date Number/ Type Action Taken C. Note: The following information is required for protects proposed to occur in, on or over wetlands that need a federal dredge and fill permit and/or authorization to use state owned submerged lands. Please provide the names, addresses and zip codes of property owners whose property directly adjoins the project (excluding applicant) and/or is located within a 500 foot radius of the project boundary (for proprietary authorizations, if any). Please provide a drawing identifying each owner and adjoining property lines. (Use additional sheets, if needed). 1 3. 5. FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 4 of 5 2. 4. 6. • 0 ORIGINAL PART 8: A. By signing this application form, I am applying, or I am applying on behalf of the owner or applicant, for the permit and/or proprietary authorizations identified above, according to the supporting data and other incidental information filed with this application. I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and represent that such information is true complete and accurate. I understand that knowingly making any false statement or representation in the application is a violation of Section 373.430, F.S. and 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. I understand this is an application and not a permit and work prior to approval is a violation. I understand that this application and any permit or proprietary authorization issued pursuant thereto, does not relieve me of any obligation for obtaining any other required federal, state, water management district or local permit prior to commencement of construction. I agree, or I agree on behalf of the owner or applicant, to operate and maintain the permitted system unless the permitting agency authorizes transfer of the permit to a responsible operation entity. Ben Kugler President & CEO Typed/Printed Name of Owner, Applicant or Agent Corporate Title, if applicable Signature of Owner, Applicant or Agent Date B. AN AGENT MAY SIGN ABOVE ONLY IF THE FOLLOWING IS COMPLETED: I hereby designate and authorize the agent listed above to act on my behalf, or on behalf of my corporation, as the agent in the processing of this application for the permit and/or proprietary authorization indicated above; and to furnish, on request, supplemental information in support of the application. In addition, I authorize the above-listed agent to bind me, or my corporation, to perform any requirement which may be necessary to procure the permit or authorization indicated above. Typed/Printed Name of Owner or Applicant Corporate Title, if applicable Signature of owner or Applicant Date C. PERSON AUTHORIZING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING: I either own the property described in this application or I have legal authority to allow access to the property, and I consent, after receiving prior notification, to any site visit on the property by agents or personnel from the Department of Environmental Protection, the Southwest Florida Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers necessary for the review and inspection of the proposed project specified in this application. I authorize these agents or personnel to enter the property as many times as may be necessary to make such review and inspection. Further, I agree to provide entry to the project site for such agents or personnel to monitor authorized work if a permit is granted. Ben Kugler President & CEO Typed/Printed Name Corporate Title, if applicable Signature Date D. I certify that the engineering features of this surface water management system have been designed by me or under my responsible charge and in my professional opinion conform with sound engineering principles and all applicable rules and specifications. I further agree that I or my engineering firm will furnish the applicant/ permittee with a set of guidelines and schedules for maintenance and operation of the surface water management system. By: Signature of Engineer of Record ! AFFIX SEAL! Date: Phone: t 727 I 793-9888 Keith E. Zayac, P.E. 48192 Name (please type) FL P.E. No. Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc Company Name 701 Enterprise Road, E, Suite 404 Company Address Safety Harbor, Florida 34695 City, State, Zip FORM 547.27/ERP(8/94)A Page 5 of 5 J BOWS TREE SERVICE APR 2 8 2005 P.O. Box 86 PLAZ?Eig'? orEN T Ozona, Fl., 34660-0086 CI OF C;L,`, Tree Inventory - Prepared for Triangle Development Inc. To: Mr. Thomas Coates, Triangle Development Inc. 4/5/2005 Re: Tree Inventory: 312 - 404 North Osceola Avenue Site overview and canopy analysis ORIGINAL The following report is submitted by Boen's Tree Service, Inc., and includes findings that we believe are accurate based on our education, experience and knowledge in the field of Arboriculture. Boen's Tree Service has no interest personally or financially in this property and our report is factual and unbiased. This report is the property of Triangle Development Inc., and will not be given to other entities unless so directed. Site Overview and Canopy Analysis The subject property is located on a bluff that slopes down to the shoreline of Clearwater Harbor and has historically been utilized for single family homes. The site has been essentially cleared of all old growth trees and native mid-story and understory vegetation. The tree canopy is comprised of second growth native tree species typical of the bluff environment and dominated by live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), pignut hickory (Carya glabra) and the native sabal palm (Sabal palmetto). The invasive exotic Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius) has colonized throughout the site forming dense thickets close to the shoreline. The inter-tidal zone supports a moderate population of mangroves including red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle), black mangrove (Avicennia germinans) and white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa). The site's understory vegetation is an admixture of ornamental shrubs, grasses and vines. The site supports few high quality trees but is laden with valuable palms including picturesque mature sabal palms and two potential high quality clusters of the Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata). The preservation of the high quality palms should be a priority. The palms can be preserved in place or transplanted on site. The overall condition of the site trees is below average as they reflect general neglect and improper maintenance. Several trees have suffered from natural stresses including wind damage, drought, lightning and vine accumulations in the crown. In addition, numerous trees had poor form and weak structure. This site does not contain trees of the quality that would warrant major site plan modification to ensure their preservation. There are however, trees that are sufficient in health, structure and appearance that should be preserved if possible. The ultimate purpose of a tree inventory is to provide the development team a hierarchy of existing trees by identifying the trees and palms most worthy of 0 0 preservation. The criteria used for evaluating individual trees are described in the following narrative. Tree Inventory Data A tree inventory is a written record of a tree's condition at the time of inspection. It is a valuable tool to prioritize tree maintenance and remove trees with problems that could lead to failure and cause personal injury or property damage. The tree inventory lists four codes and also has a comment section. The following is an explanation of the inventory data: Tree# - location - Each tree is assigned a number for reference in the inventory that corresponds with a number on the site plan that identifies the location of the tree in the field. Size - Tree size is a measure of the tree's trunk diameter measured at 4.5' above grade. If there is a fork in the trunk at that point the diameter is measured at the narrowest area below the fork. Species - Each tree is listed by its common and botanical name the first time it is listed in the inventory. For simplicity the tree is listed by its common name thereafter. Condition Rating - The condition rating is an assessment of the tree's overall structural strength and systemic health. Elements of structure include: 1) the presence of cavities, decayed wood, split, cracked, rubbing branches etc., 2) branch arrangements and attachments, i.e., well spaced vs. several branches emanating from the same area on the trunk, codominant stems vs. single leader trunk, presence of branch collars vs. included bark. Elements of systemic health relate to the tree's overall energy system measured by net photosynthesis (food made) vs. respiration (food used). A tree with good systemic health will have a vascular system that moves water, nutrients and photosynthate around the tree as needed. Indicators of a healthy systemic system used in the overall condition rating include: 1) live crown ratio (the amount of live crown a tree has relative to its mass), 2) crown density (density of the foliage), 3) tip growth (shoot elongation is a sign that the tree is making and storing energy. The overall condition rating also takes into consideration the species, appearance and any unique features. The rating scale is 0-6 with 0 being a dead tree and 6 a specimen. Increments of 0.5 are used to increase accuracy. Examples of the tree rating system are as follows: 0- A dead tree C` DID ORIGINAL 2 8 1005 0 0 I- A tree that is dying, severely declining, hazardous, harboring a communicable disease or a tree designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest i.e., Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius). A tree with a rating of 1 should be removed as it is beyond treatment and is a threat to cause personal injury or property damage. 2 - A tree exhibiting serious structural defects such as codominant stems with included bark at or near the base, large cavities, large areas of decayed wood, crown dieback, cracked/split scaffold branches etc. In addition, a tree with health issues such as low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or soil pH problems. A tree with a rating of #2 should be removed unless the problem(s) can be treated. A tree with a #2 condition rating will typically require a considerable amount of maintenance to qualify for an upgrade of the condition rating. 3- A tree with average structure and systemic health and with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a codominant stem not in the basal area that will be subordinated or cabled and braced or a codominant stem that will soon have included bark can be included as a #3. A tree with a rating of #3 has average appearance, crown density and live crown ratio and should be preserved if possible. 4- A tree with a rating of 4 has good structure and systemic health with minor problems that can be easily corrected with minor maintenance. The tree should have an attractive appearance and be essentially free of any debilitating disease or insect problem. The tree should also have above average crown density and live crown ratio. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. A tree with a rating of 4 is valuable to the property and should be preserved. 5 - A tree with very high live crown ratio and exceptional structure and systemic health and virtually free of insect or disease problems or nutritional deficiencies. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic amenities. A tree in this category should be of a species that possesses characteristics inherent to longevity and withstanding construction impacts. A tree with a #5 rating lends considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. A tree with a #5 rating is worthy of significant site plan modification to ensure its preservation. 6 - A specimen tree. A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities in regards to systemic health, structural strength, crown density, live crown ratio, form (balanced crown), overall aesthetic appeal, size, species, age and uniqueness. A great effort should be made to preserve a specimen tree including shifting structures that would adversely impact the tree. In addition, a specimen tree should have an undisturbed area equal to its dripline (equal to the branch spread) to grow in. Only an expe,enced? arid: competent International Society of Arboriculture (I.S.A.) Certified ??Arbont shoud'b iallowed work on a specimen tree. l? U V L '? APR 2 8 2005 PLAPliViNCs DEPARTMENT ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEl4l2l?dl:,_.': 0 a Comments: The comment section serves to note observations relative to the tree but not covered in the inventory data or expands on information in the inventory data. It may include maintenance recommendations to improve the tree's overall condition rating. It may also have recommendations on whether to remove or preserve a tree. NOTE: A tree inventory is typically valid for 3-5 years. However, events such as drought, lightning, mechanical root damage, freeze, improper maintenance and severe storms can downgrade the rating value of a tree. Conversely, remedial maintenance can upgrade the value. If you suspect that a tree has been adversely affected have the tree inspected by a qualified International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist. * * * * * ** * * * ** * * NOTE: This inventory was performed on March 29 & 30 and at that time deciduous trees such as the pignut hickory (Carya glabra) had no foliage present and trees such as the evergreen live oak (Quercus virginiana) and semi-evergreen laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia)trees were in flower (catkins) and had very little foliage present. The systemic health and live crown ratio was determined by the presence and concentration of flowers and leaf buds. ****************** Tree Inventory Tree# Size Species Rating Crown Spread 30" red bay (Persea borbonia.) 2.0 Comments: This tree's crown is composed of four large scaffold branches two of which have severe dieback and large dead wood and will need to be removed. The deadwood is over the public sidewalk and constitutes a hazard. The tree is in an overall state of decline and should be removed. 2 12" podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus) 3.0 6' radius Comments: This tree has a codominant stem with included bark in the upper crown but it is not considered a hazard in this species. This tree has an attractive crown and could be preserved. 3 9" laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) 3.0 13'N, 12'&,; 15'.E; 414'W'j Comments: 2005 4 4", S" arborvitae (Thuja orientalis) 2.0 PLAP, - " renRTMEMT Comments: This tree is growing between the steps of the house's porch and has no crown on the west side. The tree has very poor aesthetic appeal. ORIGINAL { NOTE: All tree species identified as invasive exotic trees on the category 41 list published by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council will be given a rating of 1.5 or less and recommended for removal. 5 8" camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) 1.5 Comments: Invasive exotic. 6 10" laurel oak Comments: n/a 7 8" laurel oak 3.0 10'N, 7'S, 9'E, 12'W 2.5 Comments: This tree has a mistletoe infestation on two branches and has flush cuts on the trunk that will cause decay. This tree also has a codominant stem in the scaffold branches of the crown that down grades the tree. Recommend removal. *8 6' Canary Island palm (Phoenix canariensis) 3.0 Comments: *This palm is not protected by City code as it has less than 10' of clear trunk. However, it is healthy and could be utilized in the site landscaping and if maintained properly will evolve into a good palm. This palm could be preserved in place or transplanted on site. 9 12' C.T. sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 3.0 6' radius 10 13' C.T. queen palm (Syagrus romanzoffana) 3.5 6' radius Comments: 11 39" live oak (Quercus virginiana) 3.5 20' N, 40'S, 33'E, 2 F W Comments: n/a 12 4" pignut hickory (Carya glabra) 2.5 Comments: This tree is young and healthy but is growing directly into the lateral branches of tree # 11 and has no where for the crown to grow. 13 6" hickory 2.0 Comments: The crown of this tree has been smothered by vines and the live crown ratio •-is very_low. 14:::7 x-40' L -stratngler fig (Ficus aurea) 1.5 APR 2 8 2005 PLANNING Dr-pfi-P- 1; FAIT ORIGINAL CIiVOFCLFA ?, i 1 ? • Comments: This native ficus tree is a menace to properties as it can reach a width of 90' and produce massive surface roots that damage pavements and other structures. Recommend removal. 15 18' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius Comments: n/a 16 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 17 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius Comments: n/a 18 7" camphor 1.5 Comments: category #I invasive exotic 19 28" live oak 3.0 30'N, 25'S, 35'W, WE Comments: This tree has a sound trunk, root flare and very good overall structure. The down grading factor of this tree is the below average live crown ratio and twig dieback. It is difficult to pinpoint the source of the dieback but it could be a combination of root loss, wind damage from last year's severe storms and a vine infestation. Even minimal impact to the root system from new construction will adversely affect this tree. This tree is only recommended for preservation if a rooting area. equal to the dripline formula can be provided. This tree's crown is one-sided to the west. 20 16' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: n/a 21 7", 775, 6", 6", 5", 4", 4" laurel oak 1.0 Comments: This tree has seven stems that emerge from a single trunk and they are all codominant to one another 1' above grade. This type of attachment is a prescription for future failure and cannot be corrected through pruning. The tree has very good systemic health but the structure is severe, recommend removal. 22 14' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm is at the shoreline and has a sweeping trunk. lt- w6uld :provide high'' - ?" ; l1 aesthetic value. Recommend preservation. -"???/' -?J APR 2,84005 ORIGINAL ?n t rem 23 13' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: See comment for #22. 24 10' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 Comments: This palm has a trunk restriction 7' above grade and the crown has been impacted by Brazilian pepper trees. This palm could be preserved however and the condition should improve when the pepper trees are removed. 25* < 10' C.T. cluster Senegal date palm (Phoenix rechnata) n/a Comments: This palm cluster does not have a stem with at least 10' of clear trunk and therefore is not protected by city code. However, it is identified in the inventory because it is healthy and has high aesthetic appeal and commercial value. The palm has not been pruned but once pruned and maintained properly should evolve into a landscape centerpiece. 26 28" live oak 3.0 20'N, 30'S, 24'E, 26'W Comments: This tree is covered with vines. The structure is above average but the down grading factor is the below average live crown ratio. The crown has dieback and deadwood but if pruned will improve in appearance. Recommend preservation only if a rooting area equal to the dripline formula is provided. 27 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 28 20" red bay 3.5 30'N, 34'S, 28'E, 0'W Comments: A one-sided tree that needs pruning to improve the appearance. It has good structure and above average live crown ratio. 29 12" laurel oak 3.0 ON, 15"S, 105E, 12'S Comments: This tree has a one-sided crown with very good live crown ratio and overall structure. The trunk is growing 6" from a sabal palm and 2' from an oak to the north. If the sabal palm and oak tree were removed this tree would evolve into a good tree. 30 26' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius Comments: This palm is downgraded because it is growing against an oak tree trunk for 5 above grade. It cannot be transplanted and will likely be injured when the'oak is \! ORIGINAL APR 2 8 2005 PLAKIMK'? Cir?t?niltjrm] CITY OF C? ??"' I 0 0 removed. However, if the oak is removed very carefully this palm could stay and would be upgraded as it is a beautiful. palm.. 31 18" laurel oak 2.5 Comments: This tree is growing in competition with tree #29 and palm #30. This tree has below average upper crown structure and poor form and is downgraded accordingly. 32 cluster ear tree (Enterolobium cyclocarpa) 0.5 Comments: This exotic tree species is highly undesirable as the wood is very brittle and it shears readily in high winds. In addition, the ear tree has weak roots and is prone to uplift completely during severe weather. Recommend removal. 33 27" hickory 4.5 25'N, 21'S, 24'E, 30'W Comments: This tree was completely bare when it was assessed however, it had an extremely high concentration of leaf buds indicating high live crown ratio. The overall structure is very good. The tree needs pruning to remove stubs and minor deadwood. Recommend preservation. 34 14" cherry laurel (Prunus carohniana) 1.5 Comments: This tree has decay in the trunk and upper scaffold branches. 35 4" citrus (Citrus spp.) 1.0 Comments: This tree is severely declining and needs to be removed. 36 20' C.T. queen palm 3.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 37 23" laurel oak 1.0 Comments: This tree has a large cavity in the main crotch and is a hazardous tree and a threat to fail. Remove as soon as possible. 38 8" camphor 1.5 APR 2 8 2005 PLANNINC3 Cliff/ OF CLn4?, `,. ORIGINAL Comments: Category # 1 invasive exotic 39 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 40 12" laurel oak 3.0 15'N, 13'S, 15'E, 14'W Comments: This tree has a symmetrical crown with above average overall structure. The live crown ratio is good. This tree could evolve into a good tree if preserved and maintained properly. 41 10" Chinaberry (Melia azedarach) 0.5 Comments: This tree has very poor form and structure as it has been topped. In addition, it is a category # 1 invasive exotic. Recommend removal. 42 5" chinaberry 0.5 Comments: category# 1 invasive exotic 43 6" red bay 2.0 Comments: This tree has very poor structure and form. Recommend removal. 44 25' C.T. queen palm 4.0 6' radius Comments: This palm is a very good palm but is growing 2' from the existing house and will need to be protected during demolition if the palm is to be preserved. 45 <10' C.T. Canary Island palm n/a Comments: This palm has only 4' of clear trunk and as such is not protected by city code. However, it has a beautiful crown and could be preserved in place or moved on site. Recommend preservation. 46 12' C. T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius Comments: This palm is growing against the foundation of the house and will be very hard to preserve. 47 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius /Comffietits" n/? 48 27" live oak 4.0 45'N, 42'S, 25'E, 45'W APR 2 8 2005 PL?KINING DEPK'.ZTf#,5.E T ORIGINAL UY OF Comments: This tree has a good root flare and trunk. In addition, it has good form and structure in the upper crown. The most downgrading factor is that large diameter branches have been stubbed off on the east side due to the presence of utility wires. The stubs need to be removed. However, this is a very good overall tree. Recommend preservation. 49 12" cherry laurel 2.5 Comments: This tree is starting to show dieback in the crown and it has a damaging girdling root at the base. 50 8" cherry laurel 2.0 Comments: This tree has a one-sided crown and is starting to dieback. In addition, it has a large wound on the trunk. 51 14" live oak 3.0 20'N, 18'S, 25'E, 0'W Comments: This tree has below average structure and form. The tree is rated 3.0 because it is systemically healthy and could evolve into a good tree if preserved and maintained properly. 52 20' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 53 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 54 1755 red bay 2.0 Comments: This tree has poor form and structure and has several broken branches in the crown. 55 6" laurel oak 2.5 Comments: This tree is downgraded because it has very poor form. 56 4" cherry laurel 2.0 r Comments: The top has been broken out of this tree and it needs Iq-136 removed", 57 7" cherry laurel 1.5 APR 2 8 2005 P1AKINING'd_MW, ?dFKW'T ORIGINAL C?ji?\ ¦{?]'OY VE1Y p . ....FJ Comments: The crown of this tree is bent over due to the overhead canopy of adjacent trees. The tree has poor form and structure. 58 8" cherry laurel 2.0 Comments: This tree has poor form and structure. 59 9" cherry laurel 2.0 Comments: This tree has poor form and structure and dieback in the crown. 60 12" cherry laurel 0.0 Comments: dead tree 61 4" cherry laurel 1.0 Comments: This tree has very poor overall form and structure. 62 11" cherry laurel 1.5 Comments: This tree has a codommant in the main fork and very poor form. 63 20", 10", 6" red bay 1.5 Comments: This tree was shown on. the survey as a 13" tree but is actually 28" diameter at the base and 36" in diameter at 4.5' above grade. The 10" diameter leader has a large vertical crack and it will have to be removed. The remainder of the tree has very poor structure. Recommend removal. 64 4" red bay 1.5 Comments: This tree has very poor form as it bends beneath the canopy of an adjacent tree. 65 12" chinaberry 1.0 Comments: This tree is a category #I invasive exotic species and an overall noxious tree. Recommend removal. 66 5", 5", 6" red bay 1.5 Comments: This tree is tri-dominant at the base and has very poor overall structure;and, form. ! 1 APR 2 8 2005 ORIGINAL i P ? . .41 CIT ] C1_ .1 .... 67 9", 111, l aurel oak 2.0 Comments: This tree has a severe codominant attachment with included bark 1' above grade. Recommend removal. 68 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 69 24' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius Comments: This tree is very attractive but needs vines removed from trunk if it is preserved. 70 8" hickory 2.5 Comments: This tree has a one-sided crown growing to the southeast. It has a codominant stem with included bark 6' above grade in two scaffold branches. 71 23' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm is exceptionally attractive and healthy. It is located on the slope of the bluff and could be preserved in place or transplanted on site. Recommend preservation. 72 22' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm has a superb crown and should be preserved or transplanted on site. 73 117),693 camphor 1.5 Comments: This tree has poor form, dieback, a codominant stem and is a category 91 invasive exotic species. 74 29" live oak 3.5 ON, 50'S, 0'E, 42'W Comments: This tree has a sound trunk and root flare. The overall structure'is exceptionalrr- and live crown ratio is above average. The form is slightly below average as it is. essentially a one-sided tree. 2005 75 7-stems >10' Senegal date palm cluster 5.0 12' radius PLAN',ze?`?' DEPPRTMEW Comments: The Senegal date palm (Phoenix reclinata) is extremely valuable,as a CLEnl; E?,- .- landscape feature. This cluster has seven stems with over 10' of clear trunk ? and severa?"?' others of various sizes. The palm has not been pruned for an extremely long time and ORIGINAL f 4 . 0 0 presently presents a shabby appearance. However, once pruned it will be striking. It is located at the toe of the slope and could be preserved in place if it is not in conflict with the site development. Otherwise the palm should be transplanted on site if feasible. Recommend consulting with a palm broker. 76 30' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm has an attractive curve to the west. There is a branch from a nearby oak tree that is rubbing the crown. This branch should be removed if the palm is preserved. 77 17" red bay 0.5 Comments: This tree has a 12" diameter dead stem and the remainder of the tree is in decline. This tree is a hazard, recommend removal. 78 4 -sterns >10' Senegal date palm cluster 4.5 12' radius Comments: This palm cluster is located by the shoreline in an area where it should be able to be preserved. It will make a beautiful landscape feature if pruned properly. Recommend preservation. 79 20" C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: This palm is located by the shoreline and is a beautiful palm. Recommend preservation. 80 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 81 32' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm would be a specimen except for a few small wounds on the trunk. Recommend preservation. 82 12' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 83 20' C.T. cabal pahn 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm has an attractive trunk that curves to the east and then back to the west. Recommend preservation. . ? 84 8" camphor 1.5 APR 2 8 2005 ORIGINAL C11YOF CLEFSr" :: ?.? I I . 0 • Comments: This tree is covered with vines and has poor form. It is also a category # 1 invasive exotic. Recommend removal- 85 4" laurel oak 0.5 Comments: The crown of this tree was blown off in the storm. Recommend removal. 86 6" hickory 2.5 Comments: This tree has suffered storm damage to the crown on the south side and the crown is saturated with vines. Recommend removal. 87 8" hickory 3.5 10'N, 5'S, WE, 15'W Comments: This tree has a straight trunk with good overall structure. The live crown ratio is above average. The form is irregular which downgrades the tree's value. If this tree is preserved and maintained properly it will evolve into a good tree. Recommend preservation. 88 10" hickory 0.5 Comments: The top of this tree has suffered irreparable damage. Recommend removal. 89 30' C.T. sabal palm 5.5 6' radius Comments: A near specimen quality palm. It is picturesque. There are a few blemishes on the trunk that downgrade this palm. Recommend preservation. 90 30' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm has an attractive curve in the trunk. This palm if preserved with #89 would make an attractive feature. If they are in the way of new construction recommend transplanting on site. 91 20' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A beautiful palm, recommend preservation. ^ s r.? '..•r? 92 4" hickory 2.5 Comments: This tree has poor form and is covered with vines. APR 2 8 2005 93 12' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius PLI`,: Comments: A good palm, recommend preservation. ORIGINAL 94 10' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius Comments: A good palm, recommend preservation. 95 11' C.T. sabal palm 3.0 6' radius Comments: n/a 96 6" cherry laurel 2.0 Comments: This tree has below average form and structure. 97 11" hickory 4.5 15'N, 15' S, 15'E, 15'W Comments: This tree has a sound trunk and root flare and good overall structure. The form is basically symmetrical and the live crown ratio is very good. Recommend preservation. 98 20' C.T. queen palm 2.5 Comments: This palm has a beautiful crown but has a large decayed area on the north side of the trunk that is a significant down grade. 99 10' C.T. queen palm 2.5 Comments: This palm has wires wrapped around the trunk and an anemic trunk. 100 14" laurel oak 2.5 Comments: This tree has a codominant stem 7' above grade that has included bark. It has a bulge at the fork indicating interior wounding. This tree also has a minor mistletoe infestation. Recommend removal. 101 16", 15", 15", 8" hickory 2.0 Comments: This tree is downgraded because of the severe codominant attachment at the base of the three large codominant stems. The 16" diameter stem is severely included to one of the 15" diameter stems. The two 15" stems have connective tissue between the stems but there is some decay in the crotch. There is also a girdling root that is causing a problem. The upper crown structure is very good and the live crown ratio is superb. The form is also exceptionally good and the tree has high aesthetic value. However, the codominant situation in the base is a major concern as this type of a situation can lead to dramatic failure. If the tree was braced with rods its condition would be upgraded however, this procedure is relatively expensive. This tree may be in the public right of way, if so check with the City of Clearwater's Urban Forestry Division (562-4950) to APR 2 8 2005 ORIGINAL I . Y . 0 0 inquire if they would be willing to perform cabling and bracing on this tree. Recommend removal if this tree is not secured by cabling and bracing. 102 23" laurel oak 3.5 25'N, 22'S, 20'E, 14'W Comments: This tree has good upper crown structure and above average live crown ratio. The tree has a cavity 8' above grade but the tree should solve this wound. The overall form is good and this tree will evolve into a good tree if preserved. Recommend preservation. 103 21' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm is almost a specimen. Recommend preservation. 104 18' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: This palm has a beautiful crown and an almost flawless trunk. 105 21' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A very good palm. 106 20' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A very good palm. 107 19' C. T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius Comments: A very. good palm. 108 14' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius Comments: A good palm. 109 18" laurel oak 2.5 Comments: This tree has two large branches that are rubbing against each other causing a wound. The tree has a large trunk canker on the west side. The main fork has poor structure. The upper crown structure has mostly epicormic growth likely from topping or storm damage a long time ago. The live crown ratio is very good. Recommend removal. 110 15' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius Comments: A good palm. APR 2 8 2005 111 15' C.T. sabal palm 4.0 6' radius ss ORiGINAL 1 ' .'. • • Comments: A very good palm. 112 20' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A very good palm. 113 17' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A very good palm. 114 20' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius Comments: A good palm. 115 16' C. T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A very good palm. 116 20' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: A superb palm. 117 20' C.T. sabal palm 5.0 6' radius Comments: A superb palm. 118 19' C.T.. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A very good palm. 119 20' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A very good palm. 120 24' C.T. sabal palm 4.5 6' radius Comments: A very good palm. 121 13" laurel oak 2.5 Comments: This tree is growing next to a laurel oak tree, # 122, and is codominant at the base with that tree. The two trees are fused together at the root collar. The_upper. crown _ structure and live crown ratio are average. ' 122 10" laurel oak 2.0 APR 2 8 2005 PLA-ij ORIGINAL Comments: This tree is attached at the base to tree 9121 which downgrades the tree's overall condition. In addition, it has poor form and is covered with vines. 123 12" camphor 1.5 Comments: This tree is diseased, has deadwood and is a category #1 invasive exotic species. Recommend removal. 124 18' C.T. sabal palm 3.5 6' radius Comments: A good palm. 125 14' C.T. sabal palm 2.5 Comments: This palm is covered with vines and Brazilian pepper trees. If the vines and peppers trees are removed it will evolve into a good palm. 126 5" laurel oak 3.0 7'N, 7'S, 7'E, 5'W Comments: This tree has average structure and form. The live crown ratio is above average. It is surrounded by pepper trees. If they are removed the tree will evolve into a good tree. Note: Tree's #127 & 128 appear just south of the property line of 312 N. Osceola Avenue and may have been inventoried in the previous tree inventory for the property south of 312 N. Osceola. If this determination is made the trees will be removed from the survey to avoid incorrect assessments in the tree mitigation process. 127 17' C.T. sabal palm Comments: A very good palm. 128 16" laurel oak 3.5 6' radius 3.5 15'N, 24'S, 12"E, 18'W Comments: This tree has very good upper crown structure and a high live crown ratio. The crown is somewhat one-sided to the south but is attractive. The tree has a palm growing into its base that has caused a slight indentation but it is not at all debilitating. 129 25" live oak 3.5 40'N, 37'S, 25'E, 30'W Comments: This tree was not shown on the survey and has been added. This tree has average live crown ratio and good overall structure. It has a vase shaped crown and.n_e_ eds,r ?.- _ pruning to remove minor deadwood and heavy moss accumulations. Recommend - preservation. APR 28 2005 ORIGINAL r._ ? ri:rW-Ya.• .. BOWS TREE SERVICE P.O. Box 86 Ozona, Fl., 34660-0086 Tree inventory for Harrison Village and Island View Condominium Site overview and tree canopy analysis: The subject property consists of two parcels. The first parcel is located west of North Osceola Avenue and is a natural bluff that slopes to the shoreline of Clearwater Harbor. The property consists of two single family home lots with old houses perched atop the bluff. The property contains relatively few of the older native shade trees typical of the bluff environment. Many properties ringing the bluff in Clearwater still retain mature specimen quality trees that pre-existed development on the bluff. Native tree species that are common to the bluff include live oak (Quercus virginiana), Southern red cedar. (Juniperus silicicola) and pignut hickory (Carya glabra) on the uplands and sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana) which grows on the slopes where seepage creates a moist environment. Additionally, the native sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) grows throughout the bluff. There were no trees inventoried that approached specimen quality and only one tree, a 38" diameter live oak tree (rated in the inventory) warrants consideration to alter the site design to preserve. Existing trees have suffered from improper tree care and general neglect. Essentially all native understory vegetation has been removed and exotic invasive species such as the Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) tree and air potato vine (Dioscorea bulbifera) have colonized on the property. The second parcel inventoried is a mixed commercial/residential tract located between North Fort Harrison Avenue and North Osceola Avenue and between Jones Street and Georgia Street. This parcel has retained only a few of the mature live oak or hickory trees such as those that are commonly observed flanking the Ft. Harrison corridor in Clearwater. The parcel is for the most part characterized by younger second growth trees or trees that have been planted for landscape purposes. The one commonality of the trees growing on this parcel is that they have been poorly maintained. Many shade tree species have experienced flush and stub cuts or have been repeatedly topped to the extent that their structure is ruined. In addition, many trees have suffered from insufficient irrigation and in some cases nutritional deficiencies. The native understory vegetation has been removed and replaced by sod or common hedge plant species. In summary, neither of the parcels supports trees or native vegetation of a quality that enhances the uniqueness and beauty of the bluff environment while providing a vegetative link to Clearwater's past. Consequently, thejinpact-of developme: to either site's urban forestry resources will be minimal. APR 2 6 206 ORIGINAL Tree Inventory Data The tree inventory provides a "snapshot" of the property and establishes a hierarchy of existing trees to assist the site designer in the process of choosing trees to be incorporated into the site design. The inventory includes the following information: 1. Tree location - Each tree is listed by a number that corresponds to the same number physically located on the site plan indicating the location of the tree in the field. 2. Tree size is expressed as diameter at breast height (DBH - the trunk diameter measured at 4.5'above grade). If there is a fork at 4.5', the measurement is taken at the narrowest point below the fork. 3. Tree species are shown by both common and botanical names the first time listed in the inventory and only by common name thereafter. 4. The trees overall value rating ranks the tree on a scale of 0-6 (half increments are used to increase accuracy) based on the trees overall health (condition). Factors such as the size, species and appearance are also considered. An explanation of the overall value rating system is provided below. 5. The crown spread for larger shade trees is shown as distance and direction from the trunk (the crown spread is only shown within the property lines). 6. The comment section provides commentary discussing specific points both positive and negative of the subject tree. NOTE: The Brazilian pepper tree (Schinus terebinthifolius) and the punk tree (Melaleuca quinquenervia) are invasive exotic trees that are recognized as category one ecological pests by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council and consequently have been so designated with an IE (invasive exotic) on the inventory and assigned a zero value in the inventory. There are other trees such as the camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora) that have also been recognized as ecological pests but have not been recognized as such in the inventory as their degree of invasiveness is not as severe in the bluff environment in Clearwater. UNL ORIGINAL APR 282005 Rating System 0 - A dead tree. 1 - Trees that are dying, severely declining, or hazardous and trees designated by the State of Florida's Exotic Pest Plant Council as a category #1 ecological pest, i.e., Brazilian pepper tree. A tree with a #1 rating should be removed. 2 - Trees exhibiting serious structural defects (i.e., codominant stems with included bark), large cavities, crown dieback, low energy, low live crown ratio, serious disease or insect problems, nutritional deficiencies or pH related problems. A tree with a #2 rating should be removed unless the problems will be mitigated. 3 - Trees that have good overall structure, crown density and systemic health with problems that can be corrected with moderate maintenance. A tree with a #3 rating should be preserved if possible. 4 - Trees with good structure and systemic health with problems that can easily be corrected with minor maintenance. Trees should exhibit good form with above average crown density. Mature trees exhibiting scars, old wounds, small cavities or other problems that are not debilitating can be included in this group particularly if they possess unique form or other aesthetic amenities relating to their age. Trees with a #4 rating should be preserved and warrant site plan modification for preservation. 5- Trees with high live crown ratio, exceptional structure, systemic health, good form and free from any serious disease, insect problem or nutritional deficiency. A tree in this category should have a balanced crown with exceptional aesthetic qualities. Trees with a #5 rating lend considerable value to the site and should be incorporated into the site design. 6- Specimen tree - A specimen tree is a tree that possesses a combination of superior qualities relating to size, specie, form, uniqueness, structure, systemic health and crown density. A specimen tree must be preserved and incorporated into a site design with an undisturbed area equal to the tree's dripline. V APR 28 2005 ORIGINAL PLf',Ye? I- R???R.- .. Ir C In, C7- C ~'. ?* • Tree Inventory Tree# Size Species Rating Crown spread 1 - 25" Laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia) 2.5 24'-N, 14'-S, 21'-E, 15'-W Comments: This tree has overall poor structure and an asymmetrical root flare due to the presence of asphalt and a curb. The tree has experienced flush cuts that will cause cavities to develop in the trunk and has old stub cuts present that will also promote decay. Recommend removal. 2- 11" Podocarpus (Podocarpus macrophyllus) 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree has stubs left on the tree and has poor overall structure. 3 - 20" Laurel oak 2.5 12'-N, 18'-S, 24'-E, 20'-W Comments: This tree has a potentially hazardous codominant stem in the trunk 10' above grade. The.tree will experience structurally weakness due to previous flush cuts and small cavities on the main leaders. It also has a thinning canopy with minor dieback occurring in the upper crown. Recommend removal. 4 - 3" Citrus (Citrus spp.) 2.0 N/A Comments: Not protected under the City's tree ordinance due to size. This tree is poor specimen - recommend removal. 5 - 12" Camphor (Cinnamomum camphora) 2.0 12'-N, 5'-S, 18'-E, 0'-W Comments: IE, This tree is one-sided with the canopy growing to the east. It has an under-developed crown. Recommend removal. 6 - 13" Podocarpus 2.0 N/A .Comments: Poor form, recommend removal. 7 - 25" Laurel oak 2.5 15'-N, 20'-S, 16'-E, 18'-W Comments: This tree has a sparse crown and low energy. The upper crown has a large percentage of dieback, recommend removal. 8 - 20 Laurel oak ; + 1 'T 18 N, 15 S, 20'-E, 20'-W APR 2 s zoos ORIGINAL CITY CT.- Cd r,;, ?.:': Comments: This tree has overall poor structure with a thinning crown and dieback in the canopy. The tree has suffered from stub cuts and flush cuts and decay will increase in the future. Recommend removal. 9 - 10" Podocarpus 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has poor structure and is covered with vines. Recommend removal. 10 - 16" Laurel oak 1.5 18'-N, 20'-E, 5'-W Comments: This tree has large deadwood and vines in the canopy. Very poor tree overall, recommend removal. 11 - 23" Laurel oak 2.0 25'-N, 20'-E, 20'-W Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has an asymmetrical base due to the presence of a concrete slab on the north side. The tree also has a thinning canopy, mistletoe, trunk cankers, crossing branches, surface roots and a large rebar imbedded in the trunk. Recommend removal. 12 - 10" Laurel oak 1.5 5'-N, 0'-E, 20'-W Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has very poor overall structure. It is covered with vines and has a one-sided crown. Recommend removal. 13 - 18" Laurel oak 2.5 14'-N, 22'-E, 15'-W Comments: This tree is located on the property line and has poor structure with the root flare located 6" from a 3'high retaining wall. The tree will cause problems in the future due to its location. 14 - 8" Podocarpus 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree has poor form. Recommend removal. 15 - 10" Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) 0 N/A 4PR ? 8 2005 Comments: IE, Recommend removal. 16 - 10" Sabal palm (Sabal palmetto) 2.0 N/A Comments: Tree has 6' of clear trunk (C.T.) and is not protected by the City of Clearwater's Tree Protection Ordinance which protects palms with a clear trunk of 10' or greater. This tree is growing under the canopy of an adjacent 38" diameter live oak tree. Recommend removal. ORIGINAL • 17 - 38" Live oak (Quercus virginiana) • 4.0 28"-N, 22'-S, 20'-E, 29'-W Comments: This tree has above average structure with minor basal decay on the southwest side and an old wound that is closing on the west side. The tree has a healthy systemic system and average crown density. The tree is pushing over a 4' high retaining wall. This is a good tree and warrants consideration for preservation. If the tree is incorporated into the site design, the original grades will have to be maintained through new retaining walls. 18 - 2-10" Jacaranda (Jacaranda mimosifolia) 2.0 18'-N, 25'-E, 12'-W Comments: This tree is on the property line and has a codominant stem low in the trunk. This species is weak wooded and susceptible to periodic freeze damage. It could be preserved for aesthetic amenities (only blue flowering tree). 19 - 14" Camphor 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree is on the property line and has been severely topped. The structure is permanently ruined. Recommend removal. 20 - Row of Pittosporum (Pittosporum tobira) 3.5 N/A Comments: A row of mature pittosporum is located near the south property line and provides screening from the adjacent property. If pruned they will provide both a functional and aesthetic amenity. 21 - Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A ff Comments: IE, Recommend removal. 22 - Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A k J? ? d 205 Put, Comments: IE, Recommend removal CITY C, ?r t 23 - Senegal date palm cluster (Phoenix reclinata) 2.5 N/A Comments: Multi-stem cluster with 8-9' of clear trunk. The palms have been neglected and need pruning. An adjacent oak tree is interfering with the crown development. Could prune oak to accommodate the palm cluster or move on site. If palm cluster will not be utilized contact a palm broker who may be willing to purchase. 24 - 19" Live oak 3.0 20'-N, 20'-S, 15'-E,18'-W Comments: This tree is systemically healthy and has average structure and canopy. The tree is covered with vines and could be a good tree with pruning and vine removal. OR 161NI„? 25 - Senegal date palm cluster 3.5 N/A Comments: There is minor damage from bird pecking on one trunk but could be an asset if cleaned up, 26 - 29" Laurel oak 2.0 18'-N, 26'-S, 23'-E, 18'-W Continents: This tree has minor basal decay, a thinning canopy and large deadwood. It also has poor structure and a heavy vine infestation. Recommend removal. 27 - 9",17" Live oak 1.5 N/A Comments: Severe dieback and decline. Recommend removal. 28 - 18" Southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora) 1.5 15'-N, 15'-S, 10'-E, 14'-W This tree has a severely thinning canopy with a high percentage of dead wood. It is also covered with vines. Recommend removal. 29 - 6" Laurel oak 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree has severe dieback and virtually no crown. Recommend removal. 30 - 6" Laurel oak 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree is severely declining and should be removed. 31 - 40" Laurel oak 1.5 16'-N, 24'-S, 20'-E, 14'-W Comments: This tree has extremely poor structure and heavy dieback on the west side. Recommend removal. 32 - 6" Citrus 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree has severe crown dieback. Recommend removal. 33 - 10" Saba] palm 3.0 N/A Comments: This tree has a heavy vine infestation but will be a good palm once vines are removed. 34 - 10" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A Comments: This tree has heavy vine infestation but will '6"a_'go0d:palm once.viJs are removed. APR 2 8 2005 ORIGINAL 0 0 35 - 20" Camphor 2.0 15'-N, 20'-S, 14'-E, 10'-W Comments: This tree has a codominant stern at the base and has dieback and branch stubs. It is also infested with vines. Recommend removal. 36 - 23" Mango (Mangifera indica) 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree has a codominant stem 3' above grade, damage from past freezes, a cavity in one leader and steel imbedded in the trunk. Recommend removal. 37 - 14" Hickory (Carya glabra) 2.5 20'-N, 0'-S, 12'-E, 10'-W Comments: This tree has a misshaped one-sided crown. It is systemically healthy and is growing 1' from a retaining wall. Could be preserved if pruned and retaining wall is removed and present grade maintained. 38 - 35" Live oak 3.5 26'-N, 15'-S, 25'-E, 14'-W Comments: This tree is overall systemically healthy but has minimal dieback. It has above average structure and needs to have vines removed. It is located 6" from a concrete retaining wall. This tree is worthy of preservation but the retaining wall will have to be removed and the present grade maintained. 39 - 7" Cherry laurel (Prunus caroliniana) 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree has very poor form and is growing beneath the canopy of tree # 38. Recommend removal. 40 - 7" Holly (Ilex attenuata `East Palatka') 3.5 12'-N, 12'-S, 12'-E, 12'-W Comments: This tree has an attractive form and is in good condition but prone to infestation from Sphaeropsis Knot disease. 41 - Podocarpus 0 N/A Comments: Dead tree, remove. 42 - 26" Laurel oak 3.0 26'-N, 24'-S, 14'-E, 22'-W Comment: This tree has a codominant trunk 15' above grade that could be strengthened with cabling and bracing. The tree needs pruning to improve structure and is growing 1' foot from house and 4' from retaining wall. Recommend preservation if maintained. _a 43?-' Sabal=palm J N 0 N/A APR 2 8 2005 . F ,r ORIGINAL Comments: No clear trunk - remove. 44 - 6" Podocarpus 2.5 N/A Comments: Below average form, recommend removal. 45 - 10" Sabal palm 2.0 N/A Comments: This palm has 4' of clear trunk and is not a protected tree by City ordinance. Recommend removal. 46 - 30" Live oak 3.0 28'-N, 22'-S, 26'-E, 21'-W Comments: This tree has a thinning crown with 15% dieback and is covered with vines. It could be preserved but will require substantial pruning. 47 - 38" Ficus (Ficus spp.) N/A N/A Comments: This tree is located on the adjacent property to the north. It is a poor specimen but its root system should be protected during construction to prevent further f . decline. I 48 - 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A Comments: Good palm with gentle curve in trunk. Recommend removing vines and preserve palm or transplant on site. 49 - 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A Comments: Tall palm with healthy crown. Recommend preserving. 50 - 10' Sabal palm 4.5 N/A Comments: Located just north of property line. Protect during construction. 51 - 10" Sabal palm 3.0 N/A Comments: Located off property line, protect during construction. 52 - 10" Sabal palm 3.0 N/A Comments: Good palm, remove vines.and.preserveif possible. 53 - 12" Laurel oak -'3:0" =N, 18'-S, 12'-E, 16'-W APR 28 2005 Pte; " ", r 77 - 7Tiff ORIGINAL Comments: This tree has a one-sided crown but has good structure and systemic health. Remove vines if tree will be preserved. 54 - 10" Sabal palm 3.0 N/A Comments: Located on property line, good palm, preserve if possible. 55 - 12 stem Senegal date palm 3.5 N/A Comments: This palm cluster has been neglected and needs heavy maintenance to restore appearance. However, it could be a very valuable addition to the site landscaping. 56- 15" Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A Comments: IE, Recommend removal. 57 - 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A Comments: Good palm, worthy of preservation. 5 58 - 12" Sabal palm 3.5 N/A l Comments: Good palm, worthy of preservation. 59 - Brazilian pepper cluster 0 N/A Comments: IE, Recommend removal. 60 - 6" Hickory 3.0 101-S Comments: Located on adjacent property, protect during construction. Ir\,6f 61 - 40" Punk tree (Melaleuca quinquenervia) 0 N/A Comments: 1E, Recommend removal. 0 APR " 2 8 2005 62 - 37 Punk tree 0 N/A n? ` Comments: IE Recommend removal. ? ?2> ' ) i / 63 - 4"Hickory-__r 3.0 N/A Comments: Tree is located on the property line at the northeast corner of the property and is growing beneath the canopy of an adjacent oak tree. - 64 - 14" Live oak 3.0 18'-N, 16'-S, 10'-E, 16'-W ORIGINAL Comments: This tree has a one-sided crown and several large stubs. It is located 1' from a building foundation. It has good structure but will probably have to be removed due to proposed demolition. 65 - Senegal date palm cluster N/A N/A Comments: Palm stems have 1' of clear trunk and are not protected by City ordinance. The cluster could be moved and allowed to grow. 66 - 11" Washington palm (Washingtonia robusta) 3.0 N/A 'Comments: Palm is located on the street right of way and belongs to the City of Clearwater. All trees growing in City rights of way should be protected during construction. If a tree needs maintenance or removal contact the City's Urban forestry Division @ 562-4950 x7220. 67 - 11" Washington palm 3.0 N/A Comments: Palm is located on street right of way. 68 - 12" Washington palm 3.0 N/A Comments: Tree is located on street right of way. 69 -10" Norfolk Island pine (Araucaria heterophylla) 3.5 N/A Comments: Attractive tree with good form and overall health. This tree is susceptible to freeze damage and should only be preserved if it is desired in the proposed landscape theme. 70 - 3" Live oak 2.5 N/A 1 Comments: Tree is not protected under City code due to size. It has an underdeveloped crown and is growing beneath trees # 69&71. Recommend removal. 71 -10" Live oak 3.0 15'-N, 12'.-S, 13'-E, 12'-W 0 Comments: This tree has poor structure but good systemic health. It has a codominant stem that can be mitigated through subordinate pruning. 72 - 28 Live oak 3.5 33'-N, 36'-S, 31 -E, 12'-W Comments:' This tre>is located on the City right of way and has a codominant stem on the southwest side-wrth included bark. Tree is pushing out curb and has a girdling root, APR 2 8 2005 Z.:, ORIGINAL CITYaF CLu., ! ^F -7 0 0 deadwood, and dead palm stump next to the trunk - all should be removed. Call City to perform required maintenance. 73 - 40" Live oak 4.0 25'-N, 39'-S, 27'-E, 30'-W Comments: This tree has good structure and average systemic health. The crown is not developed on the north side due to competition from tree #74. Good tree - preserve if possible. 74 - 50" Live oak 3.5 36'-N, 24'-S, 37'-E, 28'-W Comments: This tree is located on the City right of way and has a codominant 3.5' above grade but it has a wide crotch with the branch bark ridge present. The west side of the tree has minor damage at the root flare and basal decay that is not debilitating. The systemic system is healthy. The tree's root system has broken the curb which could be repaired by City crews. The crown is open and aesthetically appealing. This tree compliments tree # 73, protect during construction. 75 - 6" Slash pine (Pinus elliottii) 3.0 7' radius all directions Comments: This tree is systemically healthy but has a sparse crown. Could be preserved and appearance will improve with proper care. 76 - 6" Slash pine Comments: See comments for tree # 75 above. 77 - 13" Crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) 5.0 3.0 7' radius. in all directions N/A Comments: This is a beautiful tree with a full well developed crown. It has no diseases or insect problems and would lend aesthetic qualities to this site. Recommend preservation. 78 - 10" Washington palm 3.0 N/A 1 Comments: This palm is located on the right of way and has an interesting crook in the /trunk. Protect during construction. 79 - 6" Live oak 2.0 N/A I Comments: This tree is located in a buffer strip and has been topped (lollipop). It is also growing under a rack of utility wires. Recommend replacing with an accent tree. ten/ ..•i r --'?? J.. X80 - 6" Live oak 2.OJ -:j ?,- N/A. Comments: See comments for tree # 79. APR 2 8 2005 A L ?n.e?t?. ;?r*+p^"+... ""dal ORIGINA cn?'- i . . 0 0 81 - 8" Crape myrtle 3.5 N/A Comments - This tree is growing in an interior landscape island. It has an attractive crown and is healthy. Minor decay is present from improper pruning at base. This tree will develop into a good tree if cared for properly. 82 - 8" Crape myrtle 3.5 N/A Comments: See comments for tree # 81. 83 - 15" Laurel oak 2.5 20'-N, 15'-S, 15'-E, 2'-W 1 Comments: This tree has a good systemic health but has a one sided crown due to I competition from adjacent tree. It is growing 6" from building wall. Recommend removal. 84 - 14" Laurel oak 2.5 19'-N, 18'-S, 2'-E, 9'-W Comments: This tree is located 1.5' from building and will develop basal decay from injury. Recommend removal. 85 - 17" Laurel oak 2.5 15'-N, 16'-S, 10'-E, 16'-W Comments: This tree has good structure and systemic health but two 7" long flush cuts on leader will cause serious decay. If preserved it will have to be periodically monitored. )' i 86 - 42" Live oak 4.5 27'-W, 40'-S, 48'-E, 42'-W Comments: This tree has a large spreading crown with good systemic health except for a thinning upper center crown. It has minor dieback and deadwood. If tree is properly pruned it would be worthy of shifting structures to incorporate into site plan design. Recommend preservation. \ 87 - 23" Camphor 2.0 .10'-N, 21'-S, 15'-E, 16'-W Comments: This tree has two fissures in trunk from crotch to the base that will compromise the structural integrity of the tree. It also has poor form. Recommend removal. 88 - 25" Live oak 3.0 39'-N, 27'-S, 28'-E, 24'-W Comments: This tree has an irregular form and is suffering from previous poor pruning. It could develop;into better tree with proper maintenance. 189 - 22" Live oak- - 3.0 0'-N, 36'-S, 24'-E, 24'-W APR 2 8 2005 ORIGINAL 0 0 Comments: This tree has a pronounced lean to the south due to competition from tree #90. The trunk has a corkscrew effect and tree has a large stub and heavy moss. This tree i needs proper pruning. It could be preserved as a stand with trees #88, 89 & 90. 90 - 24" Live oak 3.0 7'-N, 21'-S, 15'-E, 24'-W V 15" Hickory 3.5 5'-N, 23'-S, 16'-E, 24'-W Comments: This tree has a lean to the south due to competition from tree 492. It has good j' crown density and systemic health. It has surface roots and is growing 3' from adjacent hickory. Preserve if possible. V l ?` 1 92 - 15" Hickory 3.5 22'-N, 7'-S, 12'-E, 22'-W This tree has an arrow straight trunk with good structure and crown density. Preserve along with adjacent hickory, tree# 91, if possible. 93 - 5" Hickory 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree is growing beneath the canopy of tree # 92. It has poor structure. Recommend removal. 94 - 14" Hickory 3.5 18'-N, 12'-S, 24'-E, 10'-W Comments: This tree has a narrow crown due to competition from adjacent trees. It has a large stub that needs removal and heavy moss. Comments: One sided crown to east due to competition. Good structure and systemic health. Utility wires are growing through canopy. Good tree to preserve, especially if wires will be relocated. 95 - 13" Laurel oak 2.0 12'-N, 15'-S, 8'-E, 16'-W i a Comments: This tree has poor form and minor damage to root flare on the southwest side. It has a large cavity in crotch with sporophores present. It is growing 1' from parking lot edge. Recommend removal. 96 - 30" Live oak 4.5 15'-N, 36'-S, 16'-E, 27'-W Comments: This tree has good structure and crown density and an exceptional systemic system. It is growing into the edge of the parking lot. This tree should be preserved but wiltneed the pavement to be saw-cut to accommodate the expanding root flare. 97 t9 Crape,myrtle - ?? 3.0 N/A APR 2 8 2005 r ?..r WT ORIGINAL r I 0 0 Comments: This tree has a symmetrical crown and good systemic health but is growing under tree #96. It could be preserved with minor pruning on the oak to accommodate the 1 crown. 98 - 9" Crape myrtle 3.5 N/A Comments: A good tree with symmetrical crown and above average systemic health. 99 - 8" Crape myrtle 2.5 N/A Comments: This tree has a below average crown and systemic health but would improve with a program of watering and fertilization. i 100 - 6" Multi-stemmed Wax myrtle (1llyrica cerifera) 2.0 N/A i Comments: This tree has considerable dieback and decay in the trunks. Recommend removal. 101 - 9" Crape myrtle 3.0 N/A Comments: Tree is in overall good shape but has minor decay at base where stems were removed. 102 - 10" Crape myrtle 4.0 N/A 1 Comments: A multi-stemmed tree with a full healthy crown. Recommend preservation. 103 -10" Sabal palm - 8' Clear trunk (C.T) 3.0 N/A Comments: This palm is growing in a raised planter along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. Planter is too small for this tree. Recommend removal. 104 - 8" Queen Palm (Syagrus romanzofana) 2.0 N/A Comments: This palm is in the same planter as tree # 103. Recommend removal. ,I 105 -13" Sabal palm 9'C.T. 3.5 N/A Comments: In planter, good tree - could preserve or transplant on site. 106 -13" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3.5 N/A Comments: See comments for tree # 105. U N1• 221 107 -12" Sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.5 N/A ASK J 8 2005 PL,; CIA F ORIGINAL Comments: This palm is a healthy specimen with a good appearance. It is located in a landscape buffer located between a parking lot and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. It is growing with trees # 105, 106 & 108. Recommend preserving al.l of these palms. 108 - 14" Sabal palm 6' C.T. 3.0 N/A ? Comments: See remarks for tree # 107. 109 -11" Sabal palm 10' C.T. 3.5 N/A Comments: This is a healthy palm that is located in a landscape buffer along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. It is located in a row with trees # 110, 111, & 112. The buffer is conducive to a palm landscape. Recommend preservation. 110 - 13" Saba] palm 9' C. T. 3.5 N/A Comments: See comments for tree # 109. 111 - 11" Sabal palm 2.5 N/A Comments: This palm has a small crown and has pits on the trunk. Recommend replacing with a new sabal palm to blend in with trees # 109 & 110 if they are preserved. 112 - 11" Live oak 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree has poor structure with two codominant stems at the main fork located 6' above the grade. It is in a planter too small to accommodate its future growth. Recommend removal. 113 - 12" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3.5 N/A Comments: This palm along with trees # 114 & 115 are all growing in a planter between a parking lot and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and are in very good condition. As the buffer is sure to remain they can be used to meet buffer landscape requirements. Recommend preservation of all three. 114 - 12" Sabal palm 10' C.T. 4.0 N/A Comments: See comments for tree # 113. 115 - 13" Sabal palm 8' C.T. Comments: See comments for tree # 113. 3.5 N/A t37?, APR 2 8 2005 ORIGIIVAt Note: Recommend a landscape of sabal palms along N. Ft. Harrison Avenue tying trees # 103, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 113, 114 & 115 together and fill in the gaps with new sabal palms. 116 - Brazilian pepper 0 N/A Comments: IE, Recommend removal. 117 - 5" Live oak 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal. 118 - 5" Live oak 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal. 119 - 6" Live oak 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree has been repeatedly topped. Recommend removal. 120 -12" Sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.0 N/A Comments: This is a good palm but is growing against the building and cannot be transplanted. Recommend removal. 121 - 5" Hickory 3.0 N/A Comments: This tree is growing in a parking lot island and has been topped - but with proper pruning will regain good structure. Recommend preservation. 122 - 35" Laurel oak 2.5 27'-N, 25'-S, 35'-E, 30'-W Comments: This tree has a dense crown and a healthy systemic system but is loaded with stub cuts. It also has cavities in two of the leaders and one leader has been stubbed. It has poor structure with 6 codominant leaders emanating from the main crotch, with a canker beneath. Recommend removal. 123 - 8" Multi-stemmed (6) Crape myrtle 2.5 N/A Comments: This tree has below average crown. Could be removed or preserved if maintained properly to restore. 1`24 - 10" Crape myrtle 3.0 N/A 1 Comments: This tree has an average crown that will improve if inco to maintained landscape. V ftT A. IT .a.•.. .. ORIGINAL C171" 125 -10" Crape myrtle Comments: Trees # 123, 124 & 125 are a cluster growing in a landscape planter at the corner of Jones Street and N. Ft. Harrison Avenue. They could be used for landscaping and will improve with proper maintenance. Recommend preservation. 126 - 5" Bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) 3.0 Comments: This tree is growing in a retention pond adjacent to Jones Street and has been previously topped along with trees # 127 & 131. Proper pruning can restore the structure. Recommend preservation if retention pond will remain. 127 - 6" Bald cypress 3.0 N/A Comments: See comments for tree #126. 128 - 13" Sabal palm 6' C.T. 3.5 N/A 3.0 N/A N/A Comments: Good palm growing on the top of bank of retention pond. Recommend preservation. 129 - 11" Sabal palm 5' C.T. 3.5 N/A Comments: Good palm on top of bank of retention pond. Recommend preservation. 130 - 9" Live oak 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree is located on the slope of the retention pond and has poor structure with a codominant stem 3' above grade. Recommend removal. 131 - 7" Bald cypress 3.0 N/A j Comments: See comments for tree # 126. 132 -19" Live oak 3.5 27'-N, 26'-S, 40'-E, 5'-W Comments: This tree has a lean to the east due to competition from tree # 133. The tree has good crown density, a healthy systemic system and good structure. Recommend preservation. 133 -16" Laurel oak 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree is severely declining and has dieback in leaders with sporophores 1 present on the trunk. The upper crown is mostly dead. Recommend 'removal. - L - _ _ ?" RIGINAL APR 8 2005 PIP" O 134 - 3" Live oak 1.5 N/A Comments: This tree is growing in a landscape buffer near Jones Street and has been severely topped and is in poor condition. Recommend removal. 135 - 24" Jacaranda 2.0 22'-N, 24'-S, 25'-E, 20'-W Comments: This tree is located 2' from the edge of the parking lot pavement. It has decay in several leaders and some leaders have been previously topped. The tree also has large surface roots, deadwood and stubs. Recommend removal. .136 - 14" Arbor vitae (Platycladus orientalis) 2.5 N/A Comments: This tree has an average crown that has been somewhat suppressed by tree # 135. The foliage on the west side is sparse and detracts from appearance. 137 - 5" Live oak 1.5 N/A Comments: This tree is located in a parking lot island and has been repeatedly topped and has poor structure. Recommend removal. 138 - 6" Crape myrtle 2.5 N/A Comments: This tree has nutrient deficiencies, has been pruned too hard and has a poor appearance. Recommend removal or treatment to improve overall health. 139 - 10" Sabal palm 1" C.T. 1.0 N/A Comments: This palm is growing against the building and cannot be transplanted. Recommend removal. 140 - 30" Hickory 1.5 24'-N, 27'-S, 30'-E, 22'-W Comments: The upper crown of this tree is dead. Recommend removal. 141 - 5" Laurel oak 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree is growing in a narrow area between a building and the sidewalk. There is no room for the canopy to develop. Recommend removal. 142 -11" Washington palm 3.0 N/A Comments: Tall palm growing in the City right of way. Bark has sloughed off in some spots and needs pruning. Protect during construction. _ ?V 143 - 10" 12- stemmed Crape myrtle 2.0 N/A APR ? 8 2005 ORIGINAL C Comments: This tree has poor form due to competition from other trees. Recommend i removal. 144 - 20" Live oak 3.0 N/A Comments: This tree is growing in a tight area between two buildings. It has stubs and the bark on the lower east side is sloughing off. Paint has been sprayed on the trunk. It has a good systemic system but an irregular crown. This is a borderline tree that could be removed or preserved if maintained. 145 - 18" 4 trunk Podocarpus 3.0 N/A Comments: This tree has good form and appearance but is growing against a building. It can be preserved after demolition. 146 - 5" Live oak 1.5 N/A Comments: This tree has no form due to competition from adjacent tree. Recommend removal. 147 - 24" Schefflera (Schefflera actinophylla) 0.5 N/A i Comments: This is a weak wooded tree with decay present. Recommend removal. 148 -15" Cherry laurel 1.0 N/A Comments: This tree is severely declining with large deadwood. It is a hazardous tree and should be removed. 149 12" Sabal palm 9' C.T. 3.0 N/A Comments: This tree is healthy with an average crown. Recommend preservation. 150 -13" Sabal palm 20' C.T. 3.0 N/A Comments: This would be a very good palm but the crown has been pruned back to accommodate adjacent power wires. Recommend transplanting on site. /151 - 7" Golden rain tree (Koelreuteria elegans) 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree is growing into the wires and has a lop-sided crown. Recommend removal. 152 -15" Golden rain tree ORIGINAL N 2.5 ' 5'-N, 10'-S, 8'-E, 16'-W APR 2 8 2005 Comments: This tree has a large cavity developing in the base and is growing into the wires. It has poor form and should be removed. 153 - 13" Golden rain tree 2.5 N/A Comments: This tree has an irregular crown and a cavity in the trunk 2' above the grade. It has poor form and should be removed. 154 - 8" Cherry laurel 2.0 N/A Comments: This tree has virtually no crown formation. Recommend removal 155 - 15" Cherry laurel 2.0 6'-N, 21'-S, 7'-E, 12'-W Comments: This tree has decay in the trunk and mistletoe in the crown. Recommend removal. 156 - 15" Cherry laurel 1.5 N/A Comments: This tree has a wound on the trunk, mistletoe in the crown. The crown is thinning and dying back. Recommend removal. 157 - 23" Jacaranda 2.0 34'-N, 28'-S, 9'-E, 15'-W Comments: This tree has a large cavity at the base on the southwest side and a small cavity on the east side. It has a codominant stem with included bark in the main crotch. Recommend removal. 158 -15" sabal palm 8' C.T. 3.5 N/A Comments: Tree is growing in the Osceola street right of way. It is a good palm, protect during construction. 159 - 20" Sabal palm 3.0 N/A Comments: This palm has a lean to the west due to the presence of a three story house. Recommend preserving at its present location or transplant on site. 160 -16' hickory 3.0 18'-N, 14'-S, 15'-E, 15'-W Comments: This tree is growing 1' from a house but has good crown density and a healthy systemic system. It can develop into a good tree with proper pruning. Recommend preservation. ORIGINAL APR 2 8 2005 PLAY C211 0;" cl- CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 21, 2005 Mr. Thomas Coates Triangle Property Development, LLC. 714 North Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - FLD2005-04034 - 400 Jones Street Dear Mr. Coates: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit 324 attached dwelling units with a reduction in required non-residential parking from 76 parking spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA) to 17 parking spaces (0.90 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA); an increase to the permitted height from 30' to 150' to the roof and up to 174' for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue; an increase to the height from 30' to 40' (to roof deck); an additional 16' for elevator and mechanical equipment overrun (from roof deck); an additional 9' (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue; and an increase to the permitted density from 205 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. The CDB APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C.; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Vision, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Old Bay character district; 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the nonresidential uses proposed to be located on the site be consistent with the permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the CDB, and be approved by Staff, BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK f IIBBARD, VICE MAYOR fJOYI' HA:\IICI'ON, COUNCI1AIE\1BER BILL JONSON, COUNCIUABIBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCIL \IE\1BER "FQLIAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA1lVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That evidence of filing of a Unity of Title with Pinellas County is submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 10. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (January 18, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; 11. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 12. That the boundary of the project/right-of--way along the southwest side of the site along North Osceola Avenue on the survey and all supporting site plans are corrected prior to the issuance of any building permits; 13. That North Osceola Avenue will be improved per City standards to accommodate two-way traffic between Jones Street and Georgia Street to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 14. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 15. That all streetscaping along Harrison Village be installed to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Harrison Village; and 16. That all streetscaping along Island View be installed to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Island View. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of Flexible Development approval (by July 19, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 2, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefftcr?,myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michae el>7 k . CP Planning Director 0 • 0 C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW January 31, 2006 Mr. Thomas Coates Triangle Development Company, LLC 305 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue (FLD2005-04034) Dear Mr. Coates: The subject property has zoning designation of Downtown (D) District with a consistent underlying land use category of Central Business District (CDB). Further, the subject property is located within the Old Bay character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. At its meeting of July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved a Flexible Development application to permit 324 attached dwelling units with a reduction in required non-residential parking from 76 parking spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA) to 17 parking spaces (0.90 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA); an increase to the permitted height from 30' to 150' to the roof and up to 174' for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue; an increase to the height from 30' to 40' (to roof deck); an additional 16' for elevator and mechanical equipment overrun (from roof deck); an additional 9' (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue; and an increase to the permitted density from 205 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C., subject to conditions. A Development Order for this project was issued on July 21, 2005. Subsequent to the issuance of this Development Order, no development rights have been transferred either to or from the subject property. Should you have any further question, please feel free to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert. tefft@mycleartivater. com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentILetterslZoning Letters120061Ft Harrison N410 (D) -Island View Harrison Village.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL MEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETFRSEN, COUNCII MEMBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMIiN'f AND AFFIRMA11w, ACTION EMPLOYER" t. . . `i 0 Jan. 31 2006 01:30PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94421595 Jan.31 01:29PM 00'48 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADUANITAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-h43-P-FAX C435-7329). ITY OF C LEARWATE R -- - PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 f ?'j+ ?? 11 1V MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING' 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE' CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 '?"?arXJ? ? t TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 30, 2005 Roger Larson Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 Re: • 410 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue, 300 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue and 407 N. Osceola Avenue Parcel #09/29/15/00000/430/0300 and 09/29/15/14310/000/0010 Dear Mr. Larson: The subject property is zoned Downtown District (D) and is consistent with the underlying land use designation of Central Business District (CDB) category. The subject property is located in the Old Bay Character District of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The subject property indicated above was part of a larger area of request that was recently approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) (FLD2005-04034, approved July 19, 2005). The proposal for the area under FLD2005-04034 included complete demolition of all- existing structures and the construction of a total of 324 dwelling units and 18,893 square feet of retail/office uses. A Zoning Map of the area under FLD2005-04034 is attached. As of January 21, 1999, the City adopted the Community Development Code. The adoption of this Code may have created non-conformities and, if so, they are legal nonconformities and may continue. In the event a structure in which a nonconforming use is located is destroyed or damaged to the extent of less than 50 percent of the assessed value of such structure, the nonconforming use may be re-established if a complete and legally sufficient application for all required permits to repair or restore is submitted within six months of the date of the damage. In the event a structure in which a nonconforming use is located is destroyed or damaged to 50 percent or more of the assessed value, these structures may be repaired or restored only if the structure and the use conforms to the standards of this development code for the zoning district in which it is located. Attached is a copy of the current Downtown District, as contained within the Community Development Code. Please contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III (727-562-4504 or wayne. well s@myclearwater. com) if you need further assistance. Zoning designation information is available through the City's website at myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Neil Thompson Development Review Manager S: (Planning DeparttnentlLetterslZoning Lellers1410 N Ft Harrison Ave (D).doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DOR4N, COUNCIL MFMI3FR Ho YT HAMILTON, COUNCILMFMBER CARLFN A. PFTERSFN, COUNCIIDIEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVIi ACrjoN, EMPLOYER" Ask 1----' 601 ; } I 512 513 -?\ 512 i 509 Il I? -I 500 510 507 ----I -- I ' 08 5 509 Lao- I I - I L I-I I 01 T"5 ~ i ---- r j I I 508 - __ I I- 1 - 506 I 506 503-_1 502 1 I 504 1 + 500 I _ `-_____; 500 I 501 409 'I 500 ' 407 `'-r-i I----' ?? F1 1 407--'" 404 -- X40 I X405 ?-- ------I-- i 1 ----'402 P ----- 404 405 - --140 i 403 1 ---/ 402 403 400 1 -[ 40 --- I 400 401 401 I 400 Z I r-__1 'T1 314 r, I 312 31 311 30 t 30 308 ' 304 i r- ? 305 y ?? 315 I 302 ? 3?N C) F I 1_j1--' Irk/ 302 - i 305 30t, `I i-- IL-1L1 300 ` i 301 i ' 1 302 1 I I ? 1 I __I I 1 ?- I_ 1 I r-^?______ - I I .-I `- I I?ur?' I I I } rn l I I I___ I Im N- o JONES ST / D ."-l ^ ?' N N N - ? I I Li 225 , _rj --------- 1, r ? I I r_____I POI 2011-_ I I 200 L- I -I v I C' I L---;j n ?D 20t I DREW ST Zoning Map Islandview Properties, LLC.; Harrison Village Properties, Case: FLD2005-04034 Owners: LLC. 400/410 Jones Street & 303 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-44352-002-0110 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 410 N. Fort Harrison & 309 N. Osceola Avenues 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 Property Site/PINS: 302/304/308 N. Osceola Avenue Size(Acres): 5.14 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 312/314/400/404 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 Johnson, Pope LLP 108/29/2005 3:02 PAGE 1/3* Fax Server JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP 911 Chestnut Street, P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater FL 33757=1368 Telephone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Wayne Wells Company: City of Clearwater Phone: 562-4504 Fax: 562-4865 mom: Andrea B. Bunker, Legal Assistant Client Name: Triangle S.A. Land Client/Matter Number: 45402.110642 Date: 8/29/05 Pages including this cover page: 3 Re: Request for zoning letter Property located at 300 N. Ft. Harrison, 410 N. Ft. Harrison and 407 N. Osceola Parcels numbered 09/29/15100000/430/0300 and 09/29/11/14310/000/0010 As we discussed today by telephone, we need a letter from the City of Clearwater stating the current zoning and land use for the above referenced property, as well as any variances. uossible, we need the letter by noon tomorrow. Auaust 30. Please call Raina Sullivan at this office (461-1818) when the letter is ready. We will pick a up and deliver a check for $25.00. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. The information contained in &is transmission may be attomey/client pfiviloWd and therefore confidential. This information is intended only for Qc ran of the j individual or entity mimed above. If the readir of this message is not the intended recipient, you are beteby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of tins communication is strictly prohibited. If you toceive duffs transmission in error or if you am not the individual or entity named above, tlc receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney/client or otherwise. If you haveroeeived this communication in error, please notify us by telephone, collat, and return the original tr essage to us at the above address via U.S. Postal Service. You wlll be reimbursed for any postage or any otba expense anociated with (hie return of this document. Thaak you. Johnson, Pope LLPS 8/29/2005 3:02 PAGE 2/3 OFax Server CONTINUATION SHEET SCHEDULE -A Order Number. 7681-PI-04 Commitment Number. Parcel 1 Lots 1 through 7 and the 10 foot alley lying West of Lots 1 through 3 of A.B. & Jennie Cates Subdivision, as recorded in plat book 1, page 64, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and a portion of Government Lot 4 in Section 9, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Being further described as follows: Begin at the Northwest corner of Lot 7 of said A.B. & Jennie Cates Subdivision; Thence 88056121"E, along the Southerly right of way of Georgia Street (A 40 foot right of way), a distance of 211.75 feet to the Westerly right of way line of North Fort Harrison Avenue (A 55 foot right of way); thence South, along said Westerly right of way line, a distance of 337.16 feet; thence leaving said right of way line X89058,02'W, a distance of 211.11 feet to this Easterly right of way line of Osceola Avenue (A 40 foot right of way); thence N00006114"W, along said Easterly right of way line and the Westerly Line of Lots 4 through 7 of said A.B. & Jennie Cates Subdivision, a distance of 333.12 feet, to the point of beginning. Parcel 2 Lots A and B of Bergens Replat, as recorded in plat book 26, page 41, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with the East 1/3 of Lot 2, and the West 1/3 of Lot 3 of Jones Subdivision of Nicholsons Addition to Clearwater Harbor, as recorded in plat book 1, page 13, Public Records of Hillsborough County, of which Pinellas County, was formerly a part, also together with a vacated alley as described in O.R. Book 7546, page 607 of the Public Records of Pinellas County all lying in section 9, township 29 South, range 15,East, being further described as follows: Begin at the Northeast corner of Lot B.of said Bergens Replat; thence South, along the Westerly right of way line of North Fort Harrison Avenue (A 55 foot right of way) and the Easterly line of said Lots A and B of said Bergens Replat, a distance of 179.99 feet to the Northerly right of way line of Jones Street; thence N89049145°W, along the Northerly right of way line of said Jones Street and the-Southerly line of said lot A and the Southerly line of the East 1/3 of Lot 2 and the West 1/3 of lot 3 of said Jones Subdivision of Nicholsous addition to Clearwater Harbor, a distance of 186.65 feet; thence North, along the Sage STEWART TITLE ?055 (50M 5-85) GUARANTY COMPANY Johnson, Pope LLPIS 8/29/2005 3:02 PAGE 3/3 OFax Server CONTINUATION SHEET i ' SCHEDULE-A Order Number: 7681_P1_04 Commitment Number: Westerly line of said East 1/3 of Lot 2, Janes Subdivision of Nicholsons addition to Clearwater Harbor, a distance 179.99 i feet; thence S89°49'47"E, a distance of 25.00 feet; thence North, a distance of 12.47 feet; thence S89058102"E, a distance of 161.65 feet to the Westerly right of way line of North Fort Harrison Avenue; thence along said Westerly right of may line South, a distance of 12.86 feet of the point of beginning. Subject to the following easements of records i Easement in favor of City of Clearwater, Florida recorded in O.R. Book 7519 page 329, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Ingress and Egress Easement in favor of City of Clearwater, Florida recorded is O.R. Book 7540 page 275, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Drainage and Utility Easement in favor of City of Clearwater, Florida recorded in O.R. Book 7546 page 607, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Drainage and Utility Easement in favor of City of Clearwater, Florida recorded in O.R. Book 7270 page 1731, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. ?' sae ` STEWART TITLE 0055 (60M 5415) GO ARANTYCC MPAXY Pinellas County Property Appr r Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 03 Page 2 of 5 1 09 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 430 / 0300 29-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:17:51 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales SALUATION ARMY OBK: 05198 OPG: 0577 PO BOX 8070 CLEARWATER FL 33758-8070 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 309 OSCEOLA AUE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 261.00 sales from 2003 - 2004: 1901500 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 0000; Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 153,000 Homestead: NO Ownership .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 153,000 Institutional Exem: YES Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 0 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 00 1) 50 x 80 1,400.00 50.00 F Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 .00 6) 0 x 0 .00 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be ; 3,555.29 Short Legal FROM INTERSECTION OF S R/W OF GEORGIA ST & E R/W OF Description OSCEOLA AUE RUN S 285FT FOR POB TH E 80FT (S) TH S Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property Apprer Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 03 Page 3 of 5 16 Property.._and_ Land__Use.._Code_d_ escri.ptions 09 29 / 15 1 00000 / 430 0300 :01 29-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:17:51 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use: 220 Land Use: 75 Living Units: 4 Imp Type: Duplex/Triplex Prop Address: 309 OSCEOLA AUE Structural E1?msnts Foundation Continuous Wall Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall ConeBk Roof Frame Flat-Shed Roof Cover B U Tar&Gravel/Othr # Stories 2.0 Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Quality Average Year Built 1,960 Effective Age 20 Heating Unit/Spc/W1/F1 Furn Cooling None Fixtures 20 Other Depreciation 0 Functional Depreciation 0 Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 1,212 7) .00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 1,212 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .20 176 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 RiBsidE3ntial Extra F(-_aturoBs Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) 00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) ®CIF- C ®1M http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.usihtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property App r Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 0 ;DUU %.j ?CWj ' LL ?ARR L-_ r? c17 CG G?I Oj T HAPPISON Page 4 of 5 FT HARRIS 01 ?91 HAPRISON JO VE 22S FT HAPRISON C?J 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) 2 H CC http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-ser3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/29/2005 Pinellas C,ount\ Property App?r 1111ormati011: W) 29 15 I)0O(i)) 4)() O Pa'-'e 5 01' Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to ??,u ch Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &t=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 0 Page 2 of 11 09 / 29 / 15 / 14310 / 000 / 0010 29-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:27:51 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales SALVATION ARMY OBK: 06895 OPG: 1358 PO BOX 8070 CLEARWATER FL 33758-8070 EVAC: Nan-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 410 N FT HARRISON AUE of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 261.00 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Irip Plat Information 0 /1,977 4,55811,958 44,000 (U) I 1913: Book 001 Pgs 064- 0 /1,974 4,1861 806 41,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,973 4,10311,235 20,000 (U) I 0000: Book. Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market; 2,848,200 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 2,848,200 Institutional Exem: YES Tax. Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 0 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: .00 1) 210 x 502 12.00 105,462.0 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 . 00 Without the Save-Our-Names 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 00 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be ; 66,184.19 Short Legal CATE'S, A. B. & JENNIE SUB LOTS i THRU 7 INCL & UAC Description ALLEY BETW & BERGEN'S REPL BLK A & BLK B & UAC ALLEY Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property App r Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 0 . Bui.10 »:g.,, ],_ Building 2 _11 __ . Building? 3 . Building 4 Build.ing_5 . Building 6 . Building 7 Building #1 Page 3 of 11 09 / 29 / 15 / 14310 / 000 / 0010 :01 29-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:27:51 Commercial Card 0i of 7 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 410 N FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 Structural E1?msnts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Unit: 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 12 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,924 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,975 7) .00 0 2) 00 0 8) .00 0 3) 00 0 9) . 00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) 00 0 11) . 00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 C omm e r c i a 1 E x t r a F at ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.usihtbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr Infonnation: 09 29 15 00000 430 0 Page 4 of 11 Building #2 09 I 29 / 15 / 14310 / 000 / 0010 :02 29-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:27:53 Commercial Card 02 of 7 Improvement Type: Retail Store Property Address: 300 N FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 S-truc-tural E14Bm4e ii-L s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Tilt-up Pnls/Porceln Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fran Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 20 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Square Quality Average Year Built 1,992 Effective Age 10 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 10,320 7) .00 0 2) 00 0 8) 00 0 3) 00 0 9) 00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) 00 0 11) 00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 +C(Dmm(-_rci.-?1 Extra Fsaturos Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 15000SF 1.50 15,000 22,500 22,500 999 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 22,500 Building #3 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 0 Page 5 of 11 09 / 29 / 15 / 14310 / 000 / 0010 :03 29-Aug-2005 JiM Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:27:53 Commercial Card 03 of 7 Improvement Type: Retail Store Property Address: 407 H OSCEOLA AUE Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 S-true-tural Elements Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 4 Bath Tile Hone Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,962 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,800 7) .00 0 2) Canopy .25 160 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) 00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 15X100 1.50 1,500 22250 21250 999 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 2,250 Building #4 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 r Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 0316 Page 6 of 11 Pinellas County Property App rib 09 / 29 / 15 / 14310 / 000 / 0010 :04 29-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:27:55 Commercial Card 04 of 7 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 407 N OSCEOLA AUE Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 Structural E1(--m4B nts Foundation Spread/Hono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 13 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Gable & Hip Root Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 4 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,945 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aroas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,105 7) .00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 3,105 8) .00 0 3) 00 0 9) 00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) . 00 0 C omm tH:r c i a 1 E x t r a F e at ur s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 5000SF 1.50 5,000 7,500 7,500 999 2) CONC PAVE 900 SF 3.00 900 2,700 2,700 999 3) 00 0 0 0 0 q) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 10,200 Building #5 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.usihtbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr'r Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 0316 Page 7 of 11 09 / 2 / 15 / 14310 / 000 / 0010 :05 29-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:27:56 Commercial Card 05 of 7 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 407 N OSCEOLA AVE Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 Structural E1?ments Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 6 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,956 Effective Age 30, Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i.00 j,809 7) .00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 1,809 8) .00 0 3) 00 0 9) 00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) 00 0 11) 00 0 6) 00 0 12) .00 0 CommoBrcial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) SPAIJAC/HT 4,500.00 1 4,500 1,800 1,956 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 1,800 Building #6 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=l &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property App or Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 06 Page 8 of 11 09 / 29 115 1 14310 1000 10010 :06 29-Rug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:27:59 Commercial Card 06 of 7 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 407 N OSCEOLA AUE Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 Structural E1E3miBnts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 10 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,961 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 4,779 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 935 8) .00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area .90 351 9) .00 0 4) 00 0 10) .00 0 5) 00 0 11) 00 0 6) 00 0 12) 00 0 Coxiim(E:rC1a1 Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) 00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #7 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr r Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 03 Page 9 of 11 09 / 29 / 15 / 14310 / 000 / 0010 :07 29-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 15:27:59 Commercial Card 07 of 7 Improvement Type: Res Conversion Property Address: 407 N OSCEOLA AUE Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 Structural E1?m?nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Wood. W/ Subfloor- Ext.erior Wall Frame Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Shed Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Asphalt Tile Interior Finish Wallboard Total Units 0 Heating & Air Wall/Floor Furnace Fixtures 27 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,925 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 2,8j2 7) 00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area 90 5,498 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .20 54 9) .00 0 4) 00 0 10) 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) 00 0 CommerC.1a1 Extra FoaturoS Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) 00 0 0 0 0 3) 00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) [ *_1 F ; ]?, Ff 14 1 M Fa- I http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.usihtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 Pinellas County Property App r Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 03? ,A"VE iSCT Lr. a' E C?tL,a 13./(--14 270rS'J n 13; ?..'±.' A 31 U r 0(5 919 i LIL ( n] C? c? 1 I 3 Q I FT G 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 10 of 11 505 F T HARRISON 501 FT HARRItierN http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=l&b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 JONES Pincllas County Propcrty App r Information: 09 29 15 00000 430 0' 0 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Pay 11 of 11 4.: w, k *? lhttp:llpao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&... 8/29/2005 C I TY OF C LEARWATE R ' =la PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 +'sl+d?f h t I MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 21, 2005 Mr. Thomas Coates Triangle Property Development, LLC. 714 North Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - FLD2005-04034 - 400 Jones Street Dear Mr. Coates: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit 324 attached dwelling units with a reduction in required non-residential parking from 76 parking spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA) to 17 parking spaces (0.90 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA); an increase to the permitted height from 30' to 150' to the roof and up to 174' for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue; an increase to the height from 30' to 40' (to roof deck); an additional 16' for elevator and mechanical equipment overrun (from roof deck); an additional 9' (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue; and an increase to the permitted density from 205 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. The CDB APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C.; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Vision, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Old Bay character district; 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the nonresidential uses proposed to be located on the site be consistent with the permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the CDB, and be approved by Staff, BRIAN J. AUNGSC, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HA:\IICCON, COUN'CIUNIDIBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILNIENIBER 'EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE Ac'nON EMPLOYER" • 0 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That evidence of filing of a Unity of Title with Pinellas County is submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 10. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (January 18, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; 11. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 12. That the boundary of the project/right-of-way along the southwest side of the site along North Osceola Avenue on the survey and all supporting site plans are corrected prior to the issuance of any building permits; 13. That North Osceola Avenue will be improved per City standards to accommodate two-way traffic between Jones Street and Georgia Street to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 14. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 15. That all streetscaping along Harrison Village be installed to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Harrison Village; and 16. That all streetscaping along Island View be installed to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Island View. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of Flexible Development approval (by July 19, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 2, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft@Mclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michae elk,`?ICP Planning Director • 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, July 19, 2005, beginning at 1:00 PM, in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners etc will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Copt from 06-21-05) Clearwater Retail Partners, LLC. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit retail sales and services with a reduction to the front (west along US Hwy 19 N) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pavement), an increase to building height of an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck - roof deck at 18.67-ft height), a reduction to required parking from 36 to 33 spaces and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street (US Hwy 19 N), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C; and a reduction to the interior landscaping requirement from 10 percent to 6.8 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Retail sales and services [7,217 sq ft]) at 18419 U.S. Highway 19 North, Sec. 20-29-16, M&B 33.04. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-02017 2. Mexico Grande, Inc. (Amscot Financial) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a problematic use within 500 ft of another problematic use and abutting single-family residential uses to the west as otherwise required by Sec 2-704.L; a reduction in the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 8 ft (to pavement); a reduction in the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to pavement); a reduction in the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement); a reduction in the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 4 ft (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Commercial District under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C and a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1201.G. (Proposed Use: Problematic Use [Amscot]) at 1874 North Highland Avenue, Sec. 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-01004 3. Salvation Army, 302-308 N Osceola Properties LLC., Green Corner Inc., Morrishill Inc., Georgia Street Properties LLC., Osceola-Jones Properties LLC. (Triangle Development, LLC, Ben Kugler, Islandview Properties, LLC and Harrison Village Properties, LLC.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 324 attached dwelling units, a reduction in required non-residential parking from 76 parking spaces (4 spaces per 1,000 sq ft GFA) to 17 spaces (0.90 spaces per 1,000 sq ft GFA), an increase in the permitted height from 30 ft to 150 ft to the roof and up to 174 ft for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Ave, an increase in height from 30 ft to 40 ft (to roof deck), an additional 16 ft for elevator and mechanical equipment overrun (from roof deck) and an additional 9 ft (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Ave and an increase of the permitted density from 205 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions W, of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use development including 324 attached dwellings and 18,893 sq ft of non-residential floor area) at 410 N. Ft. Harrison, 400 & 410 Jones St., 302-304, 308-309, 312, 314. 400 & 404 Osceola Ave, Cate's A.B. & Jennie Sub, Lots 1-7 including VAC alley between, lots 8-11 and subm land, and Bergen's repl Blk A & B and VAC alley; Lutz, Clovis C. Sub, Tract A & B, subm land, and loft strip of land adj N; Jones' Sub of Nicholson's, Blk 2, parts of Lots 1 & 2; Sec. 09-29-15, M&B's 43.03, 43.04, 43.05 & 43.06. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-04034 4. Doris Toews, Doris Towes, Tre Rem, Liberty Mirabel LLC. (Battle Creek Hospitality, Inc., Raxit Shah and Punit Shah) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 12 attached dwelling units with reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft to parking; a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft to parking; a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 15 ft to 1.5 ft to pool deck and 10 ft to pool; a reduction in the lot width from 150 ft to 142 ft, and an increase in height from 30 ft to 48 ft to roof deck and additional 8 ft for parapet and other architectural embellishments (from roof deck to top of parapet) and an additional 12 ft for elevator/stairwell overrun (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, in the Island Estates Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (IENCOD)/Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District under the provisions of Sec's 2404.17 and 2-1602. C and H. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [12 units - condominium]) at 211 & 221 Skiff Point, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 5-A, Lots 33 & 34. Assigned Planner: Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner. FLD2005-04036 5. Home Energy, LLC. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.63 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 It (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 30 ft to 43.17 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 5.5 ft (from roof deck) and an additional 13.67 ft for an open rooftop pavilion (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, with reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 ft (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [four townhomes and 16 condominiums]) at 415 Island Way> Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 17 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-04035 6. BayEsplanade.com LLC. (William Blackwood) are requesting a Flexible Development to permit a 2,183 sq-ft, 5-slip commercial dock in conjunction with an existing 5-unit motel, under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed Use: Commercial dock) at 627 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay, unit No. 5, Replat Blk 78, Lot 7 and subm land. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-03027 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings • 0 it and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 07/03/05 0 ! Date: July 19, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-04034 Owners: Islandview Properties, LLC Harrison Village Properties, LLC Applicant: Triangle Property Development, LLC (Ben Kugler) Representative: Thomas Coates - Triangle Property Development, LLC Address: 400 Jones Street (302, 303, 304,308, 309, 312, 314, 400, 404, North Osceola Avenue; 400/410 Jones Street; 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue) CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 324 attached dwelling units, a reduction in required non-residential parking from 76 parking spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA) to 17 spaces (0.90 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 150 feet to the roof and up to 174 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, an increase in height from 30 feet to 40 feet (to roof deck), an additional 16 feet for elevator and mechanical equipment overrun (from roof deck) and an additional nine feet (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue and an increase of the permitted density from 205 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. EXISTING ZONING / Downtown District (D) LAND USE: Central Business District (CDB) Classification CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTER DISTRICT: Old Bay PROPERTY USE: Parcel A (Island View) Current Use: Four vacant residential buildings Proposed Use: 279 attached dwellings Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 1 9 0 Parcel B Current Use: Eight buildings used by the Salvation Army as (Harrison Village) social/community services Proposed Use: 45 attached dwellings/ 18,893 square feet of retail/office uses ADJACENT ZONING / North: Downtown District - Vehicle sales and display/multi-family LAND USE: residential South: Downtown District - Overnight accommodations/multi- family residential East: Downtown District - Vehicle sales and display/problematic use/office West: Downtown District - Multi-family residential/Clearwater Harbor ANALYSIS: Update: This application for Flexible Development approval is an amendment to a Flexible Development application that was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on January 18, 2005. That approved application included a request to permit 191 attached dwelling units, a reduction in required parking from 371 parking spaces (1.5 spaces per dwelling unit and four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA for non-residential uses as required by Code) to 343 spaces (1.5 spaces per dwelling unit or 290 spaces, 2.55 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA for office uses or 53 spaces and zero spaces for the retail uses), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 150 feet to the roof and up to 174 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, an increase in height from 30 feet to 50 feet to the roof and up to 58 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue and an increase of the permitted density from 145 dwelling units to 191 dwelling units by using 45 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. The applicant is requesting changes to the approved plan because the size of the site has been increased by 56,426 square feet due to the acquisition of property adjacent to the north on the west side of North Osceola Avenue. The proposed amendments/changes to the request are as follows: 1. The property has increased from 167,509 square feet to 223,935 square feet (net increase of 56,426 square feet); 2. The number of dwelling units has increased from 191 units to 324 units; 3. The amount of non-residential floor area has decreased from 20,194 square feet to 18,893; 4. The number of required parking spaces has increased from between 231 and 368 spaces to between 362 and 562 spaces (net increase of between 131 and 194 spaces); 5. The number of proposed parking spaces has increased from 343 spaces to 503 spaces; 6. The number of dwellings needed from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool has increased from 45 units to 119 units; Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 2 7. The development proposed on Parcel A (Island View) has increased from 50 dwelling units to 279 units; 8. The development proposed on Parcel A (Island View) now consists of two towers where the previous site plan proposed one tower however, the proposed setbacks are greater with the current proposal; 9. The development proposed on Parcel B (Harrison Village) has decreased from 141 dwelling units to 45 units; and 10. The North Osceola Avenue right-of-way will be vacated and realigned approximately 95 feet to east. The realigned right-of-way will be increased by 10 feet over the existing width to a width of approximately 50 feet. Standard Previously Proposed (current site Difference approved site plan plan) Density 191 dwelling units 324 dwelling units +133 dwelling units Density required 46 119 +73 from pool Lot area 167,509 square feet 225,236 square feet +57,727 square feet Parcel A: 150 feet Parcel A: 150 feet Parcel A: N/A Height Parcel B: 50 feet Parcel B: 40 feet Parcel B: -10 feet Parking spaces 343 spaces 503 spaces +160 Front setback 20 feet 20 feet N/A Side (north) 5 feet 20 feet +15 feet setback Side (south) 10 feet 30 feet +20 feet setback Rear setback 60 feet 60 feet N/A The basic concept and style of the original request has not changed and includes: 1. A mixed used development with residential and non-residential uses within two buildings utilizing a Mediterranean-influenced style of architecture; and 2. An increase of the permitted density through the use of dwelling units allocated from the from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan area Public Amenities Incentive Pool. Site Location and Existing Conditions: The site is 5.17 acres generally located on the west side of North Fort Harrison Avenue bound by Jones Street to the south, Georgia Street to the north and Clearwater Harbor to the west. The subject site, consisting of two parcels to be joined together through a unity of title prior to the issuance any building permits, is currently bifurcated by North Osceola Avenue creating two parcels, Parcel A (Island View) and Parcel B (Harrison Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 3 Village). A portion of the site, 8,693 square feet or 0.1995 acres, is within the Preservation future land use classification and does not yield any density. This portion of the site has not been included as part of any density calculations. Parcel A is located on the west side of North Osceola Avenue approximately 150 feet north of Jones Street and includes 3.75 acres. Parcel A had been developed with eight buildings between two and three stories in height in the period from 1900 to 1955. All of these buildings are in varying states of disrepair, or were prior to their demolition. It is noted that the City had condemned one of the buildings on the southern portion of the site, and that all four of the buildings on the southern portion of the site have been demolished. Parcel B is 1.21 acres and is bound by North Fort Harrison and North Osceola Avenues to the east and west, respectively and Jones and Georgia Streets to the south and north, respectively. Properties located at 301 North Osceola Avenue (located on the east side of North Osceola Avenue approximately 80 feet north of Jones Street) and 401 Jones Street (located at the northeast corner of Jones Street and North Osceola Avenue) are not a part of the development. The southwest side of Parcel B has been developed with four, two-story buildings totaling 11,139 square feet constructed between 1925 and 1939. The Salvation Army has developed the remainder of Parcel B with eight buildings constructed between 1924 and 1992. Two of the buildings are used for transient residential purposes with the remainder of the buildings used for social services, offices, etc. The buildings are generally in good condition. A total of four driveways, with two driveways along Osceola Avenue (north), one driveway along Osceola Avenue (west) and one driveway along Jones Street (south), currently provide access to the site. The existing buildings, driveways and parking spaces will be demolished with this proposal. Proposal: Parcel A - Island View: The proposal includes 279 attached dwellings within a single building. The building consists of two residential towers 150 feet in height joined by a six-story center 62 feet in height, which consists of a five level (including one sub-level) robotic parking garage, and two levels of residential dwelling units. The building will be located approximately 20 feet from the front (east) property line along North Osceola Avenue, 20 feet from the side (north) property line, 30 feet from the side (south) property line and 60 feet from the rear (west) property line (where 20 feet, five feet, 10 feet and 60 feet, respectively, had previously been approved). A total of 503 robotic, handicap-compliant structured parking spaces will be provided on Parcel A with one story below and four stories above ground. This parking will serve all 324 attached dwelling units within both Island View and Harrison Village. Robotic parking is a new concept in the United States. The particular system proposed with this development works, in brief, by the user driving onto a platform from which the vehicle will not leave until the driver retrieves the vehicle. The driver exits the vehicle and it is moved into the most convenient space within the garage automatically. A compact disk detailing this system has been provided with this staff report. The Code requires that between one (324 spaces) and 1.5 (486 spaces) parking spaces per dwelling unit be provided. The proposal includes a total of 503 spaces meeting all the requirements for parking for the residential component of the proposal. An additional 17 parking spaces will be provided for users of the non-residential component included with Parcel B Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 4 0 • (Harrison Village). The four existing driveways will be removed from Osceola Avenue. Vehicular access to the parking garage will be via an ingress-only and an egress-only set of driveways along North Osceola Avenue. In addition, two separate, looped drop-off driveways will be provided with on at the northeast corner of the site and another more centrally located along North Osceola Avenue. The proposal includes the installation of landscaping around the perimeter of the site consistent with the intent of the Code and Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan including India hawthorn, variegated pittosporum, viburnum, live oak and date and sabal palms. Each tower will include a main entrance providing access to an elevator/stairwell lobby. The center portion also includes a main entrance providing access to the dwelling units located on the fifth and sixth floors above the robotic parking garage. The three main entrances will face North Osceola Avenue. The proposed materials will be painted stucco with natural colors and a terra cotta tile roof. The increase in height above 30 feet is consistent with the criteria for a Flexible Development proposal as well as the Vision, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan as outlined below. Further, the height is consistent with the maximum allowable height within the Old Bay Character District. The Design Guidelines contained in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan requires high-rise structures to use the following techniques: ? Building stories or/stepbacks differentiated by architectural features including but not limited to coping, balustrades, cornice lines, change in materials, etc; and ? A proportional relationship between the height of a building and the number and dimensions of stepbacks used to mitigate the height of the building. The building is articulated through the use of recesses and projections to vary its width, building stories are differentiated by architectural features including cornice lines, balconies and coping and stepbacks are provided at the upper floors. While the main roof extends to 150 feet in height, architectural embellishments, including a cupola and parapet walls extend up to an additional 24 feet providing additional visual interest. The area is characterized by several taller buildings including the Church of Scientology's Sandcastle (approximately 70 feet) and the Osceola Inn (approximately 60 feet) to the south, and Belvedere Apartments (approximately 70 feet) to the west and south. The remainder of the buildings in the area range in height from 15 to 35 feet. Consistent with the Design Guidelines, the building incorporates articulation of the fenestration along the front (north, south and west) and side (east) facades. In addition, several stepbacks are provided including a stepback of 64 feet at the fifth floor along the east fagade, and stepbacks of eight feet, four feet and eight feet at the tenth, eleventh and fourteenth floors along the west fagade. In addition, 140 feet separate the two towers. This results in extensive negative and positive space on all sides of the building adding to the visual aesthetics. In addition, the water-facing side of the building utilizes the same level of detail and architectural embellishments as the front of the building facing North Osceola Avenue. A private clubhouse for use by residents and their guests is located on the ground floor of the south tower. The ground floor also includes other amenities, such as: a spa, pool, patio / decking, and snack bar. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 5 • • Solid waste services will be provided via two dumpsters and two compactors at the southeast corner of the site. These dumpsters will also serve Harrison Village (Parcel B) to the east. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal with the site as the Island View portion of the site will accommodate all stormwater runoff generated by both Island View and Harrison Village. Parcel B - Harrison Village: The proposal includes 45 attached dwellings and 18,893 square feet of non-residential (retail, restaurant and office) uses within a building 40 feet in height. The building will occupy almost the entire site and will be located between four and eight feet from the front (east) property line along North Fort Harrison Avenue, 17 feet along Georgia Street, 19 feet along Jones Street and four and eight feet along realigned North Osceola Avenue, similar to the previously approved site plan. A covered arcade is located along North Fort Harrison Avenue between four and eight feet from the east property line. Non-residential uses will be located along North Fort Harrison Avenue, Jones and Georgia Streets and at the southwest and southeast corners of the site along North Osceola Avenue. The remainder of the building facade, facing North Osceola Avenue, will consist of attached dwellings. All non-residential space will be located on the ground floor. While the type of ownership for the all the units will be condominium, the facade of the building located along North Osceola Avenue and containing dwelling units will resemble townhomes. The entrances to these units will be directly from North Osceola Avenue. The remainder of the dwelling units, accessible from three, centrally located lobbies (one at each end and one in the center of the building), will be located on the upper two to three floors. The proposed amenities for this portion of the development include a rooftop pool and patio complete with gazebo and grilling area. As outlined above in the section detailing Island View (Parcel A), robotic structured parking, located on the Island View site, will provide all 503 spaces serving the site. A total of 41 on- street parking spaces will be provided to serve the retail component of the development with 23 on-street parking spaces provided along North Osceola Avenue, and 18 spaces along the west side of North Fort Harrison Avenue. An additional 17 spaces will be made available within the parking garage located on Parcel A (Island View) for use by employees of the non-residential component of the development and/or guests of residents. These spaces will adequately serve the non-residential component of the proposal as the retail uses proposed are not intended to act as a destination point for shoppers outside of residents in the neighborhood. It is expected that most users of the retail space will walk in from the surrounding neighborhood and from this development itself. A drop-off area for deliveries for the retail spaces will be designated along North Fort Harrison Avenue. A bus stop will also be provided along North Fort Harrison Avenue. The drop-off area along North Fort Harrison Avenue will be suitable for moving vans/trucks as well. In addition, looped drop-off driveways will be provided at the northeast and southeast corner of the Island View site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 6 • • The proposal includes the addition of landscaping around the perimeter of the site consistent with the intent of the Code and with the Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan included in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan including Medjool Palms, Indian Hawthorn, variegated Pittosporum, Viburnum and Sabal palms. The details of the final landscape and streetscaping plan (plant material, paving materials and patterns, types and location of street furniture such as benches, trash receptacles, street lights, etc.) will be closely coordinated with City staff to ensure a seamless transition between the developer-installed portions of the streetscape and adjacent City improvements. The fagades of this building will complement and visually support the building located on Parcel A (Island View) incorporating similar arched elements, canopies, balconies and an extensive use of windows as part of a Mediterranean-revival style of architecture. The proposed materials will be painted stucco with bright natural colors, metal railings and terra cotta tile roofs. The increase in height above 30 feet is consistent with the criteria for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The overall height of the building (37 feet) is similar to several other buildings in the vicinity including the Church of Scientology's Sandcastle (approximately 70 feet) and the Osceola Inn (approximately 60 feet) to the south, and Belvedere Apartments (approximately 70 feet) to the west and south. The remainder of the buildings in the area range in height from 15 to 35 feet. While the main roof extends to 37 feet in height, architectural embellishments including clock towers and parapet walls extend up to an additional nine feet providing additional visual interest and further reinforcing the Mediterranean-influenced style of the building. It is noted that the height proposed is consistent with the height limitations identified in the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan (Old Bay Character District). The design of the building is consistent with the intent and direction of the Design Guidelines of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The fagade of the building along all street frontages is highly articulated and accented by various architectural details including fenestration, awnings and balconies. An arcade along North Fort Harrison Avenue is located between four and eight feet from the property line along that street. The portions of this fagade include a stepback of four feet at approximately 30 feet (third floor) while other portions of the fagade are entirely setback from the property line approximately 10 feet. That same level of articulation of the fenestration occurs on all street frontages. Solid waste services will be provided via two dumpsters and two compactors at the southeast corner of the site Island View (Parcel A) portion of the development. All stormwater requirements have been met with this proposal with the site. Vacation/Realignment of North Osceola Avenue: The proposal includes the vacation and relocation of the existing abutting portion of the North Osceola Avenue right-of-way and the subsequent widening and realignment of the street. North Osceola Avenue is currently a substandard 40-foot right-of-way with a pavement width of approximately 20 feet. It also makes three, roughly 90-degree, bends within close proximity of each other between Jones and Georgia Streets. The realignment of North Osceola Avenue will eliminate the northernmost bend and increase the distance between the two remaining bends. In addition, the applicant proposes to increase the width of the realigned North Osceola Avenue right-of-way by approximately 10 feet, resulting in a standard 50-foot right-of-way and thus Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 7 0 • permitting two-way traffic to traverse this section of the road. The newly widened North Osceola Avenue right-of-way will provide for 24 feet of pavement and 26 feet of sidewalk, landscaping and on-street parking. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are a number of outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site, specifically with regard to Parcel A (Island View). These issues primarily deal with overgrown lot, hazardous buildings, etc. and will be rectified with the implementation of this proposal. In addition, the applicant has demolished four of the buildings on Parcel A. Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The site is located within the Old Bay character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan recommends that this area be redeveloped with a mix of residential and limited neighborhood commercial and office uses. Specifically, it recommends the redevelopment of the Old Bay with a variety of densities and housing styles. This District provides an opportunity for higher-density residential uses along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue, provided such development is sensitive to the established low-rise historic character of the District. North Fort Harrison Avenue is envisioned as the main commercial area, providing neighborhood commercial uses on properties on both sides of the street. This strategy has been identified as a way to stimulate the redevelopment of property in the area and to reposition the Downtown as a viable economic entity in the region. To assist in the transformation of Downtown Clearwater into a quality place in which to live, work and play, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes a Public Amenities Incentive Pool of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses. The applicant is proposing the use of 119 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. The amenities provided by this development in order to justify the Public Amenities Incentive Pool include the provision of streetscaping along North Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues and Jones and Georgia Streets. The streetscaping will include 41 on-street parking spaces along North Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues, all sidewalks improved with interlocking pavers, solid waste containers, benches and gas streetlights and extensive landscaping including Medjool Date and Sabal palms, Indian Hawthorn, Viburnum and Crepe Myrtle. These improvements will match those as outlined in the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan. The development proposal also includes the widening and realignment of the North Osceola Avenue right-of-way as discussed previously, and the extension of paved improvements westward within the Georgia Street right-of-way and the provision of emergency access roadway with stabilized sod subgrade cul-de-sac. These improvements, valued at $1,980,076, will both support the development of this vibrant mixed-use project and other developments within the Downtown Plan area. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes criteria against which proposals to be located within the Plan boundaries are measured and are discussed further in this report. This proposal is consistent with the Plan. Parcel A (Island View), on its own, is entitled to a density of up to 50 dwelling units per acre because it is over two acres in area. Parcel B (Harrison Village), on its own, is entitled to a density of up to 25 dwelling units per acre because it is less than two acres in area. Separately the two sites would be able to be developed with up to a total of 217 dwelling units. The Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 8 ® • applicant is proposing to join the two sites together through a unity of title subsequent to City approval of this application and prior to the issuance of any building permits. The combined developable area of the two sites is 4.97 acres (this figure does not include a portion of the site, 8,693 square feet or 0.1995 acres, that is within the Preservation future land use classification which does not yield any density) and has a maximum permitted density of up to 50 dwelling units per acre or 248 dwelling units. The applicant is also proposing 18,893 square feet of non- residential floor area with the development. The Old Bay character district has a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50. The proposed floor area of non-residential area requires 37,786 square feet (0.867 acres) of land area which is subtracted from the total (developable) land area of 216,543 square feet (4.97 acres). This leaves 178,757 square feet (4.10 acres) of land with development potential of 205 dwelling units. A total of 324 dwelling units are proposed for the development requiring 119 dwelling units to be used from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan specifies that the CDB will review projects, which seek to make use of the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. The proposal is consistent with the Vision, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan including: 1. Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. This project will provide neighborhood-scale retail uses, urban residential uses, a streetscape which will match the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan, buildings located along and oriented towards all abutting streets and furthers this vision statement. 2. Vision: Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues should be redeveloped as pedestrian oriented streets and in conjunction with Cleveland Street form the major retail core Downtown. This project will provide neighborhood-scale retail uses, urban residential uses and furthers this vision statement. In addition, the installation of a streetscape which matches the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan will contribute towards a pedestrian oriented atmosphere. 3. Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The proposed buildings incorporate a Mediterranean-influenced style of architecture. The building utilizes high-quality materials such as stucco and a terra cotta barrel tile roof. Attractive architectural detailing, including the use of coping and trim bands, will add to the aesthetic quality of the building. The buildings will be painted attractive bright earth-tone colors and will include an extensive use of stepbacks and articulation of the fenestration. 4. Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. This project will provide a density of just over 65 dwellings per acre and is a pioneering Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 9 0 mixed-use project for downtown within the Old Bay character district. The residential and commercial uses created by this project will further this goal of creating a vibrant downtown. 5. Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the design guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The proposal provides 324 attached dwellings and approximately 19,000 square feet of office and retail space as part of an attractive mixed-use development. 6. Objective lE: A variety of businesses are encouraged to relocate and expand in Downtown to provide a stable employment center, as well as employment opportunities for Downtown residents. The development provides for approximately 19,000 square feet of new retail and office space helping to provide a stable employment center and additional employment opportunities. 7. Objective 1G: Residential uses in Downtown are encouraged with a variety of densities, housing types and affordability consistent with the character districts. The development includes 324 dwelling units with a variety of types including low-rise and high-rise apartments, villas, and townhomes. Floor plans range from one to four bedrooms between 1,000 square feet and 2,600 square feet in living area and prices ranging from $275,000 to $2,000,000 with the average price approximately $600,000. 8. Objective 1H: The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provides a pool of development potential from which projects may acquire additional dwelling units. This project includes using 119 dwelling units from that pool to achieve the desired density for the site increasing the viability and vibrancy of the project. The proposal includes almost $2 million in right-of-way improvements for Jones and Georgia Streets and North Osceola and North Fort Harrison Avenues. These improvements include streetscaping to match the City's Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan and the realignment and widening of North Osceola Avenue. 9. Objective 1K: Downtown shall be a safe environment for both residents and visitors by addressing real and perceived public safety issues. The immediate area, with some notable exceptions, is characterized by low-quality, attached dwellings generally poorly maintained which contribute to a real and perceived impression of a lack of safety. The redevelopment of this site with attractive high-quality structures and the influx of additional residents and shoppers will improve the appearance of the area, contributing to a safer environment. 10. Objective 2A: The Downtown street grid should be maintained to provide multiple access points in and through Downtown, to assist in dispersing traffic on various routes and contribute to improved traffic operations. Vacation of streets shall be evaluated based on redevelopment potential provided alternative access exists or can Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 10 • • be provided. The existing grid system will be improved by the proposal. The existing North Osceola Avenue right-of-way will be vacated, widened by 10 feet (for a total width of 50 feet), and realigned approximately 90 feet to the east. The result will be the elimination of one of the three existing 90-degree turns and greater spacing between the remaining two 90-degree bends. North Osceola Avenue will be designated as a two-way street in the vicinity of this site. The street also takes advantage of a relatively low traffic volume along North Osceola Avenue by locating the principle access points to the project from that street. 11. Objective 2H: A variety of parking solutions for motorized and non-motorized vehicles shall be pursued to support redevelopment while maintaining ease of access and parking throughout the Downtown. The proposal includes a new concept in structured parking called "robotic parking." The particular system proposed with this development works essentially by the user driving onto a platform. The driver exits the vehicle and it is moved automatically into the most convenient space within the garage. The vehicle will not leave that platform until the driver retrieves the vehicle. 12. Objective 21: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The proposal includes the provision of 12- to 17-foot wide walkways abutting the storefronts beneath the arcades along North Fort Harrison Avenue, as well as landscape islands varying between 9- and 12- feet in width; a 5-foot wide sidewalks along North Osceola Avenue with 12-foot wide landscape islands; and 5-foot wide sidewalks along Georgia and Jones Streets complemented by generous plaza space at the corners of the Georgia and Jones Streets and North Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues and centrally along Georgia and Jones Streets. The proposal also includes clearly marked pedestrian crosswalks across North Osceola Avenue at Jones and Georgia Streets as well as a mid-block crossing. The design of the streetscaping along all streets will match the components of the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. 13. Goal 3: Create Downtown as a memorable place to be enjoyed by residents and visitors that capitalizes on Clearwater's waterfront location, natural resources, built environment and history. The project will effectively increase density within the Old Bay character district while providing for an attractive streetscape through commercial uses, striking buildings, new sidewalks and landscaping. 14. Objective 313: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. The development proposal provides buildings that will complement the existing pattern of development along North Fort Harrison and North Osceola Avenues incorporating arched elements, canopies, balconies and an extensive use of windows as part of a Mediterranean-revival style of architecture. The step-backs will result in the appearance to passersby of a building in harmony with other buildings in the area. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 11 • 15. Policy 1: The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. The proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines by incorporating a detail-rich Mediterranean-revival style of architecture utilizing high- quality materials including stucco and terra cotta barrel tile roofs. The design also incorporates extensive use of stepbacks and articulation of the fenestration and a variety of architectural details such as balconies, railings, awnings, a covered arcade, coping, parapet walls, etc. 16. Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. Staff has worked diligently with the applicant to help create a development consistent with the vision of the Old Bay character district which provides for a mixed-use development supporting the Downtown employment base with residential, limited neighborhood commercial and office uses. The high-rise located on Parcel A is consistent with the portion of the character district vision which provides for an opportunity for higher-density residential uses along Clearwater Harbor west of Osceola Avenue. 17. Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The design of the site and buildings contributes to the pedestrian environment by providing an active streetscape including wide sidewalks, fountains, public art, seating, lush landscaping, shade provided by awnings and an arcade, and ground-floor commercial spaces. 18. Polio: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development utilizes 119 dwelling units from the pool. The proposal includes almost $2 million in right-of-way improvements for Jones and Georgia Streets and North Osceola and North Fort Harrison Avenues. These improvements include streetscaping to match the City's Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan and the realignment and widening of North Osceola Avenue. 19. Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. Amenities for the site include a clubhouse with gym, meeting spaces, barbeque areas, swimming pools, hot tubs and gardens. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 12 20. Policy 25: The City shall give priority to sidewalk construction within Downtown that enhances pedestrian linkages and/or completes a continuous sidewalk system on all streets. The proposal includes generous sidewalks along North Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues and Jones and Georgia Streets. The sidewalks will include interlocking pavers, benches, shaded arcades (along North Fort Harrison Avenue only), solid waste containers and gas streetlights matching the City's Master Streetscape and Wayfinding Plan. The proposal is also consistent with Old Bay character district Policies including: 1. Policy 1: The Public Incentives Amenities Pool shall not be available to any property located on the west of Osceola Avenue between Eldridge Street and the northern boundary of the Old Bay character district. The subject site is located south of Eldridge Street and the development uses 119 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. 2. Policy 7: New development on North Fort Harrison Avenue shall be oriented toward the street to encourage pedestrian activity and a dynamic street life. The proposal includes a new development oriented towards all abutting streets including North Fort Harrison Avenue. Commercial uses are located along North Fort Harrison Avenue and residential uses face all streets. 3. Policy 9: Mixed-use development that has office and retail uses on the first floor and residential uses above are encouraged along North Fort Harrison Avenue. The proposal includes office and retail uses on the first floor along North Fort Harrison Avenue with residential uses above. 4. Policy 11: Preferred housing styles east of Osceola Avenue are single-family detached and townhouses. Attached dwellings in this area may be considered upon assembly of at least one acre and preferably one city block. The proposal includes a land assemblage of just over five acres and more than 90 percent of a city block. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Clearwater Downtown RoilovnlnnMa"t Plan and d-ndv .Cvrtinn 2-90.3)! Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density (50 du/ac; 257 dwelling units) 324 dwelling units X* FAR (0.5) 0.087 X Impervious surface ratio (1.0) 0.49 X Lot area (N/A) 225,236 square feet (5.17 acres) X Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 13 0 0 Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Parcel A: 440 feet Lot width (N/A) X Parcel B: 530 feet Parcel A: 150' - 8" Height (Parcel A: 50 feet; maximum 150 Parcel B: 37 feet (to roof deck); 40 feet (to X feet; Parcel B: 40 feet; top of parapet); 46 feet (to architectural maximum 50 feet) embellishments; 53 feet (to top of elevator/mechanical equipment structure) Parking spaces (Retail: 38 - 76 spaces; Attached Dwellings 503 spaces X 324 - 486 spaces; Total: 362 - 562 spaces) * See Staff analysis above regarding the use of Public Amenities Incentive Pool and parking discussion. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Code Section 2-903.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce X the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the X immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of X the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 14 • • Consistent Inconsistent 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-Avenue parking are justified by the benefits to community X character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will X be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown X District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS (Code Section 3- 913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, X bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the X value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the X proposed use. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of X operation impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 15 9 COMPLIANCE WITH DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES: • Consistent Inconsistent 1. Site Design: Blocks and Lot Characteristics X 2. Site Design: Access, Circulation and Parking X 3. Site Design: Site Elements X 4. Building Placement: Location X 5. Building Placement: Orientation X 6. Building Placement: Separation X 7. Building Placement: Building Coverage X 8. Building Placement: Additional Requirements for Character Districts and Special Areas X 9. Building Design: Form X 10. Building Design: Architecture X 11. Signs N/A N/A 12. Lighting X 13. Property Maintenance N/A N/A 14. Pinellas Trail N/A N/A 15. Utility/Infrastructure Facilities N/A N/A 16. Corporate Design N/A N/A SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 2, 2005. The applicant has worked with Staff over the past several months to provide an attractive, well-designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. In addition, the basic concept and form is consistent with the site plan and elevations approved previously by the CDB. The development will further the City's goals of improving the character of the area and promoting private sector investment within the Downtown. The proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project use, with all applicable standards of the Community Development Code and is consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 16 • • The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit 324 attached dwelling units, a reduction in required non-residential parking from 76 parking spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA) to 17 spaces (0.90 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 150 feet to the roof and up to 174 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, an increase in height from 30 feet to 40 feet (to roof deck), an additional 16 feet for elevator and mechanical equipment overrun (from roof deck) and an additional nine feet (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue and an increase of the permitted density from 205 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. with the following recommended findings of fact, recommended conclusions of law and conditions of approval: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. The subject property totals 225,236 square feet (5.17 acres) and is approximately 500 feet wide; 2. Approximately 8,693 square feet (0.1995 acres) of the site is within the Preservation future land use plan classification and does not generate density or FAR; 3. The portion of the site which generates density/FAR is 4.97 acres; 4. The request for relief from maximum height limits and establishment of a mixed-use development within the Downtown (D) district is permissible as a Comprehensive Infill Development Project under the Code provisions of Section 2-903.C; 5. This application for Flexible Development approval is an amendment to a Flexible Development application that was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on January 18, 2005. 6. The concept and style of the original request has not changed and includes: a) A mixed used development with residential and non-residential uses within two buildings utilizing a Mediterranean-influenced style of architecture; and b) An increase of the permitted density through the use of dwelling units allocated from the from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan area Public Amenities Incentive Pool; 7. The proposal seeks to use 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan area Public Amenities Incentive Pool; and 8. The proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Design Guidelines contained therein. Recommended Conclusions of Law: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Vision, Goals, Objects and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Old Bay Character District; Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 17 • 0 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Conditions of Approval (* conditions consistent with those associated with the previously approved application): 1. That the nonresidential uses proposed to be located on the site be consistent with the permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan *; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff*; 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy*; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work*; 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits*; 6. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits*; 7. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes*: a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size*; and b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building*; 8. That evidence of filing of a Unity of Title with Pinellas County is submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits*; 9. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of- way*; 10. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (July 19, 2005) of Community Development Board approval*; and 11. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit*; 12. That the North Osceola Avenue right-of-way will be improved per City standards*; 13. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy*; 14. That all streetscaping adjacent to Harrison Village (Parcel B) is installed to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Harrison Village*; and Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 18 0 0 15. That all streetscaping along Island View (Parcel A) is installed to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Island View*. Prepared by Planning Department Staff Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Robotic Parking details CD Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFlexlPending cases)Up for the next DRCUones 0400 Osceola Jones Condos (D)Uones 0400 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - July 19, 2005 - Case FLD2005-04034 - Page 19 rl • Sy MNE 9? Y? SEC1(E77 ?1 y ?R3H? < Q' BC(]?TT C£ MN33NMLL S7 GRANT O C?RLTON om ? W <? TAN ENO#,, N me Q Sr AN A' 3' ryppp? al =1 1 LASALLE ST ? P? SWFF v Sr P" BUFF ST PALM BLUFF 5< >r g B 9Rl0,p JUROEN6 ST L rO C7. W T? 1 CEDAR ST p t, g -F] ? Q Q S7 NI O 2 ay, L7 C El wsT ? Q O D 7 MALE MANE d LEE ST Ir PROJECT RATA gr I? g ,MCKSON Hw sr SITE ? ; & DEB ?s= CREW ST SR. 590 OF!<u ?wFlOw,a Q LAURA v El ? ??G LAURA ? I;? ? ? ?1? N.E. SR. SO CLEVELAND Sr = F-167 11 ?Y ST g p PIERCE ? ? ? Si x S7 < E7 E PIERCE Sr PISME o ???o?o? ou t ?3 z OR COURT . Q ? ?b g 7 COULD ST a??oo?o? Eo?? C ESTNUr ST ? Q ODIMT ST w? [] F] ? TURNER ? TURNER ST E a ? ?? PIN I P P1 PINE 97 PPE - ? n nnv.e B PSNE Location Map Owners: Islandview Properties, LLC.; Harrison Village Properties, Case: FLD2005-04034 LLC. 400/410 Jones Street & 303 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-44352-002-0110 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 410 N. Fort Harrison & 309 N. Osceola Avenues 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 Site/PINs: 302/304/308 N. Osceola Avenue Property Size(Acres): 5.14 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 312/3141400/404 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 400/410 Jones Street & 303 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-44352-002-0110 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 410 N. Fort Harrison & 309 N. Osceola Avenues 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 Property Site/PINs: 302/304/308 N. Osceola Avenue Size(Acres): 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 312/314/400/404 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 09-29-15-14310 000-0080 5.14 n a - , 51r3 tl 51 i l ? 512 ? 508 '-_y A10 I r 510 1 I 507 ----1 _ Law 509 - L------ ,DUfI ?? j ---- 1 i ------ ? L- I 508 IL-- 1 - - 1-L I _ 506 5-- 506 I 1- X505 ---- 1 0-_ 502 I j I I 1 504 500 !1 ? ?_ _? J + 1 ` Sot 500 I i I i J 500 I 409 'i . 407 ` J? ?---- 4 ? 1 I b'0 I 1_ 404 r X405----1-- 1 1 I 402 P 404 405 1 1 1 ----'__ 403 1 I 409 I 40 ? r 402 400 - ^I i r 4n0 401 x,333 I $ ?1 912 1 321--- 3 311 31 r _J ?-, r' I ? 906 317 -- 908 -? Ir ? ? - L_-J r ?05 304 O 1 --I ? r-LI r? 902 J ® t 305 1 1-' 1--' :? 3L2 ?1 r-- ??? Q I 1 9011 i.J^, 300 302 -- 'r I I ; of I m i I F t__7I-?.`?__9001 ^ r JONES ST --------- 1 ---- ?. ?' i1 t t 225 , t 1,Q I I D LJ 1------- T I F-I ----- f " r 1 / ? I I r r ! J 1----? L 2011__) --------- 200 Ij J'a Li ?° I i i I 1 DREW ST Zoning Map Owners: Islandview Properties, LLC.; Harrison Village Properties, Case: FLD2005-04034 LLC. 400/410 Jones Street & 303 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-44352-002-0110 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 410 N. Fort Harrison & 309 N. Osceola Avenues 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 Property Site/PINS: 302/304/308 N. Osceola Avenue Size(Acres): 5.14 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 312/314/400/404 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 a 51 513 508 A 500 510 517 ----( 508 509 510 1I I I ' 1---------- j ' r _ 'ti50f1 C? T' ? f 1 ---- _i L r ?416 flampy resid n 502 `-' '--' a tic Retail ------? Wo 1 ,?L 501 ay! 409 '. GEORGIA ST. 407 i--- I I - ?; , ;107 ;1 a ? vehicle 404 ' -' -- 1 I ? I 1 402 , 1 --- aoa 4L ?a e a l_ 1 - 7?? 402 403 I I 400 0 4W MUltl- L -r-- 4 401 z yl $!- V ii aS - Lr 'flo 401 Z family ; rlsiutglu 31 , 812 311 31 ;j j se I r 0 l 308 'OIL--J l__--- 305 31 ? ? 304 5 -?05 ' 1 302 -? j, 302 ? I -- Z 1 1 1 ' ~I` - -- fC I [] 301 1 300 302 I'Multi-_-__" ? 1 1 m I 1- rJ 1 1 1 i ' - I' ' 1a- I o r -- 1 ? residential JONES ST ?- ; .. M.in n • `? 1 i 225- I \ f\ v , glk1F _j mikilations accommod ions/ 1 Worship r----- ' I I ? --- 1----? L 1 i ' I I?'es?aur nt I i ---------- 1-, o O ice 200 1? 1 Jv j W) DREW ST Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owners: Islandview Properties, LLC.; Harrison Village Properties, Case: FLD2005-04034 LLC. 400/410 Jones Street & 303 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-44352-002-0110 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 410 N. Fort Harrison & 309 N. Osceola Avenues 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 Site/PINS: 302/304/308 N. Osceola Avenue Property Size(Acres): 5.14 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 312/314/400/404 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 i_--? 001 5 513 1-5 I 50D wo 51 i I 507 CB ;wtl COD I r L__I S L?_ r- - i_ i LEI ? I ---1 1 L nj J ! 1 ------' i ! ? 501 , I 1 409 11 I 407 I WATER ' 1---- 405 r---- 403 I 2 403 I 400 L 401 401 I , r?_I 3 31' I i 321 _ 311 -- CBD - . 3D4 302 ~I'°°?° 1 ??*! ? `' a? ?' ?-•? f 1 ? ! 301 II? a?M CBD CBD a1 a ? I ?J Future Land Use Map Owners: Islandview Properties, LLC.; Harrison Village Properties, Case: FLD2005-04034 LLC. 400/410 Jones Street & 303 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-44352-002-0110 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 410 N. Fort Harrison & 309 N. Osceola Avenues 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 Site/PINS: 302/304/308 N. Osceola Avenue Property 5.14 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 Size(Acres): 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 312/314/400/404 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 0 0 511 7 509 510 6 5 508 506 3 4 504 1 2 I 1 500 1 vl 0 to to O ? O 400 r-- `44353 - 225 I i ? ,,_. I ca ? , i I ° I 6 5964 70 i 9 I & I 7 8 7 6 I I ( ^ a i pv ---__-___ >e -- -- r- - - - rI I Z ' 1 ? 3 4 6 I 5 LL I 4 1 _ 11 2 3 j ? I 1 I? 1 3 I I Comparative map - approved site plan perimeters and updated site plan perimeters Comparative map - approved site plan perimeters and updated site plan perimeters gig 1: View looking southeast from Osceola and Georgia. Ins { 3: View looking west from Ft. Harrison and Georgia. 5: View looking southwest from Ft. Harrison. 6: View looking northwest from Ft. Harrison. 400 Jones Street FLD2004-05037 Harrison Village - 1 2: View looking east from Georgia. 4: View looking southwest from Ft. Harrison. 7: View looking southeast from Osceola and Jones. IIt u It all 9: View looking east from Osceola. . ?r Iv n ra n N?lb t1 11: View looking southwest from Ft. Harrison. 12: View looking northwest from Ft. Harrison. 400 Jones Street FLD2004-05037 Harrison Village - 2 8: View looking east from Osceola. 10: View looking southeast from Osceola. A -;alr ?? 400 Jones Street FLD2004-05037 Harrison Village - 3 14: View looking northeast from Osceola. 13: View looking southeast from Osceola. 16: View looking northeast from Osceola. 15: View looking northeast from Osceola. 18: View looking southeast from Osceola. 17: View looking northeast from Osceola. L uo ? { 1 je' o 0 AK = S o v ? C o • -500 ET 40 63 1404 U u L 312 ¦ -f?L 2 44352 t 0.3 ran -?j LO 400 Jones Street FLD2004-05037 Harrison Village Photo Key 41-1 tw-, 41-A 4 (1rr L" 2 A 1000 a to East Side'"" .. ;4 L IIIIS6 x-40 4 40 4if 1: View looking northwest from Osceola. 3: View looking northwest from Osceola. 1 :'? A ' .t 5: View looking northeast from Osceola. 6: View looking northeast from Osceola. 400 Jones Street FLD2004-05037 Island View - I 2: View looking west from Osceola. 4: View looking north from Osceola. i - r._ r'1d.L I r 9: View looking northwest from Osceola. 400 Jones Street FLD2004-05037 Island View - 2 8: View looking west from Osceola. 7: View looking northwest from Osceola. 10: View looking northwest from Osceola. 12: View looking southwest from Osceola. 11: View looking southwest from Osceola. {ry L J r--i d s A!' 1 i 5±h I & . T dN ? K!d ?? e 4:6 y` 6 '' k3 7 9 r7 T r, 1 dr -? L J ? Ult s ? ?1 1 4i t" ? ** j pp + o o ? s 41', 4 I O C 1 nh of L 910,. + 2 ?-`? ? + Z 3 y - .f J0.108 44352 attty 10 221, N4pE61 f0 9 d .ac 1 T 37840 , West Side 2*14 "UN 7 4 5 3 2 6 07940 2 (CID n 30D cc; )m 400 Jones Street FLD2004-05037 Island View Photo Key 268A 2688 ;, ° Clearwater 41 I . » PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ! 1 ?° ENGINEERING I GIS I I t .n:,mr ,.L L 71 I xr g!p 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33780 + I I ?iJ' I z //AUnno evL?'• rr Ph.: (727)662.4760, Fax: (727)6284736 D -p -1 A- I -T www.l*yC[earwater.com I 1 r 'R _.0.'x i , n'•' ' i' - 1° I rb» n L1„e 1 =w ! NlCyc.dc`L'` axt A A, !/ sl= - ( ' I b i• 9?.;•' ?!I!' S; -_ tiu ! I -j r h w lftbft.% Atft POn aarme?nenm by m. py .r t-fb. wa 1 v ( ?Nxxa,xbnemMareavays,..,a1v..ro,,.rw?..c..oNe :?`: ???..» ae lrYees?rnnarq merrne amw -- _ Flbnes CI..o PWAw 17 .7, -1? I ael ?•_ !/)•3 ??' .Q I v,ei - W-1=A11 un CnvO o!peerwererPW.vE I ,• J _ - / rrr`?' » (( V 30,. 91. I!bkn eOISeldredP•M+a'.MQ Oanoe"„[0 fM '/l » trt le,0'-.+-• Jr _- .- -_ ccl0ery.ron3Y+wbMrs.'eiebab•ar^ksMMdtltls arw.b my Omerpntlcubrwe. RSIMm,ae. me _lyma.wsrr7Y/A•£ •e t'?ie '_ --r?• C•--- I Yo,mer xarfeadro Iebl WlP fin lire wr,taure r- I= o ' 1111 "J ae9mFn F is --- TU-DlsrwMI U1 \ ' -- a M AW .- w O..k.'n- uw (/y., `T+' y' ?,-_1 § r • -.!? b _) II ! n ri _/r3/M/•? I ' _' I'm -?iA GrMe?y14 ir.N bna 31 y, \? r-?3 ?V r5 k' _.? ?11 I,f! ( I u, ?'Y .S.- __10._ A4V -AtM.4am es•1 JJLL . .v ? ,¢ 100 t l A) '? J ! ' i /? l1?- ,r [NNC:-GxMaip$. n.i010anMGtwlwvoe:, )a +? ? 0 : a••'r' --G'?!?Q ""?e ?"_ ,?,? „.?,r ,.k,? ?li,t !!'! ??AI?'"'-?x ! I ?', ? ' O,«.ta,NS, r1 I I iaa[oD .. S c. s nM9F'OMrOW [On,rNrbn x' 13310 0;;~/•+O,c LrrB» 1 _ n a Iw /I. 'j? -t; M„ !al X_ [oA1Mb11[Uy01914 4P9CIK Jbb JI9TR?9 1 e» T:TwIYn '=1: r?iu??oa ~sF.nafidnalopy ,,'') I > I t x, f'rere / re e.r/ Ila;'», I a •tl K o-? v » a r? Ya xt D. Dx.?x'+n o.rrNN+vhn e ? f w s 3 f ? ,L ! IL- .r 1 City Owned Property H? 1 I Lq I ?, cv' Y F a/ a" I» k ` I--- , rl ,r. ? N n0:+: ----- t.-- -- wni.3„s} ' --- - . Agreement to Annex I I s' - u „ x. Y Is Annexation Deannexatlon Correction Rezoning 05 G a' ^ 3U6 NUMBER ('-Rarer to PlM) 1 w+ .•° ? ? .. II 11 pOr I C?) BLOCK NUMBER II?-- II II ? ? as w'r- r, ., - --pr SUB PARCEL NUMBER ns (•s» /1 0 ?ru J P E R_ 111 p i L , 01 n ? x 'A ? ? 11 I ? ? ?" ? ? ? C?roZ? PARCEL NUMBER (M86) LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) x nr I , I .t 'v ,r. - PLATTED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY f 1 a, , Au -L I (G?? .. / I `e13r0 r1 " L, ??' I ' . rr) a -IT1 ?- - 1 L.)es ! j COUNTY HIGHWAY 1' usn 1 ' x a @ S e l.. - >a O STATE HIGMNAY I » ,_rasl - • : ° =- ? u 0 F r i ? ns j :n ®r U.S. HIGHWAY 2 r7 ..e F ?' - r Outside City of Clearwater -- - (; -? - - --- - Zoning Atlas 3 %`?l7 h -A .. ---- - i-- - --- -? -- Mar 21, 2005 li r_- 3 , . r -- u r SE 114 of 9-29-15 2776 286A 2868 287A • r a ¦¦¦¦ 0 0 JONES ST. Two-inch by Two-inch Map Owners: Islandview Properties, LLC.; Harrison Village Properties, Case: FLD2005-04034 LLC. 400/410 Jones Street & 303 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-44352-002-0110 09-29-15-44352-002-0020 09-29-15-44352-002-0012 410 N. Fort Harrison & 309 N. Osceola Avenues 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 Site/PINs: 302/304/308 N. Osceola Avenue Property Size(Acres): 5.14 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 09-29-15-53370-000-0010 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 312/314/400/404 N. Osceola Avenue 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 FLD2005-04034 - 172 302-308 N OSCEOLA PROPERTIES L 714 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - AITKEN, DEBORA K AITKEN, DAVID N 2814 AUTUMN LAKE DR KATY TX 77450 - 5700 ANDRUS, BRIAN L ANDRUS,DONNA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH-E CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3933 ANDRUS, D THE HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT 206TR PO BOX 775 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0775 AUSTIN, LLOYD B THE AUSTIN, THELMA L THE 5840 SINGLE FOOT CT SPARKS NV 89436 - 7062 BASKIN, HAMDEN H III BAUMAN, MARY L BASKIN, ROBYN T 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 3 B 13577 FEATHER SOUND DR STE 550 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3918 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 BEAN, MARJORIE E BELVEDERE APTS OF CLW INC 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 510 300 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3946 BERLE, RONALD BERNSTEIN, BRADFORD N BERLE, PEGGY A BEACH, HAROLD 131 LEEWARD IS 2441 HONOLULU AVE # 120 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2304 MONTROSE CA 91020 - BILGUTAY, ILHAN M BOLGER, ELEANOR H 510 N GARDEN AVE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 811 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4126 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3915 BROWN, MAXINE S BULGER, LORRAINE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 708 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH E CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3933 BURNISON, JACK BUSWEILER, JOHN T BURNISON, PENNY E BUSWEILER, CATHERINE E 409 N FORT HARRISON AVE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 503 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3904 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3938 CARMEL, MORDEHAY CARTER, ROBERT E 4220 MESA VISTA DR CARTER, JUDITH M LA CANADA CA 00030 - 5521 EL ENCANTO DR SANTA ROSA CA 95409 - 4308 CHAMBERS, DIANNE B CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG CHAMBERS, JAMES D SVC 820 EL DORADO AVE 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 BARTON, DONNA L D'AREZZO, JAMES D 465 1 ST ST W STE # 300 SONOMA CA 95476 - 6600 BAYBAK, MICHAEL 4515 OCEAN VIEW BLVD # 305 LA CANADA CA 91011 - 1438 BEND, JOSEPH P THE BEND, AGNES L THE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 BETES, GONZALO 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 2-13 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3916 BROWN, ARNOLD PROPERTIES 17757 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 275 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6592 BURDETTE, HARRY M JR 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 405 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 BYRNES, LAWRENCE F 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 605 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CATANZARO, GEORGE J CATANZARO, SHERRA M 540 JONES ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4150 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 0 0 CICMANEC, JOSEPH A CITIZENS COMMISSION ON HUMAN R CLEARWATER INV INC CICMANEC, JOANNE I 305 N FORT HARRISON AVE 13577 FEATHER SOUND DR STE 550 507 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3923 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3906 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition CLEARWATER-GARDEN TOWER COALE, JOHN P Doug Williams, President OPERAT VANSUSTEREN, GRETA C 2544 Frisco Drive 330 GARFIELD ST 500 N OSCEOLA AVE PH C Clearwater, FL 33761 SANTA FE NM 87501 - 2640 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3932 COATES, THOMAS COBB, DONALD D COOMBS, PHYLLIS M COATES, MARLENE COBB, SUSAN M 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 4B 511 N OSCEOLA AVE 603 7TH ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3918 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - LIVERPOOL NY 13088 - CORBETT, ERNEST COTA, JEFFERY D CULLODEN, CHARLES A THE CORBETT, GAYE COTA, PATRICIA L CULLODEN, SALLY B THE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 802 3410 HARGER CT 2000 BEL AIRE DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 SACRAMENTO CA 95821 - 3717 GLENDALE CA 91201 - 1127 CUNNINGHAM, SHERRI L DARE, LOUIS DAVIS, EDWARD A RAMP, LENIN DARE, SUSAN DAVIS, PEGGY J 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 408 9630 LA TUNA CANYON RD 1206 HONAN DR CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 SUN VALLEY CA 91206 - 4260 SOUTH BEND IN 46614 - 2172 DOBIN, BART DOBIN, BART DORNBUSCH, HARRIETTE KENDLER DOBIN, EMMA DOBIN, EMMA 35 WATCHUNG RD 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6 C 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6 D SHORT HILLS NJ 33755 - 3935 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3919 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3919 DORSETT, KENDALL L ECCLES, CHET R III ECHEVERRIA, MILDRED DORSETT, ELLEN ECCLES, INGRID L 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6-A 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 107 PO BOX 490 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 APPLEGATE CA 95703 - 0490 ECKSTEIN, UDO ERIKSEN, VIVIAN S KROCHSTREET 38 ERIKSEN, ROCHELLE K FARHA 52445 TITZ 00004 - PO BOX 847 500 N T T, , MARY OSCEOLA K AVE # THE 103 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 GERMANY MONTE VISTA CO 81144 - 0847 FINANCIAL LITERACY TRUST FISCHLER, IDO FORD, SANDRA BYRNES, LAWRENCE BEN FISCHLER, DAPHNA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 303 411 CLEVELAND ST # 136 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 208 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 GAIMAN, D B VITALITY HSE 2-3 IMBERHORNE GAIMAN, SHEILA GANGELHOFF, DAVID J EAST GRINSTEAD PO BOX 10550 405 N FORT HARRISON AVE WEST SUSSEX RH19 IRL 00009 - GLENDALE CA 91209 - 3550 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3904 UNITED KINGDOM • GARDNER, JOSEPH EST 401 N GARDEN AVE # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4174 GLEASON, FRANK R GLEASON, SUSANNE W 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 HAGAN, JILL 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # PHG CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3947 Georgia Street Properties, LLC 714 N Ft Harrison Ave Clearwater, FL 33755 GRAVES, ROBERT M 244 HARTNELL PL SACRAMENTO CA 95825 - 6612 HALEVY, BINIAMIN HALEVY,SARA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 I? GIBSON, ROBERT W GIBSON, GENEVIEVE 7610 SMETANA LN #309 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 - 4753 GREEN CORNER INC 535 CENTRAL AVE ST PETERSBURG FL 33701 - 3703 HARBOR BLUFFS WATERFRONT CONDO 500 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3947 HARRIS, PATRICIA HARRISON-JONES PROPERTIES LLC HARTELL, JAMES H 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 3D 133 CANDY LN HARTELL, EDITH P CLEARWATER FL 33755 - PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 310 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 HEINEY, MICHAEL 411 CLEVELAND ST # 133 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 HOLMES, WILLIE B 505 N GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4127 JAMESCHRIS CORP 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 JONES-BANAS, PENNY A BANAS,TED 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 606 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 KING, MICHAEL KING, TIMOTHY J 124 PLACER DR SANTA BARBARA CA 93117 - HELLER, HUBERT A 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 2 C CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3916 IMMERSITE NETWORK INC 504 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3905 JENSEN, CRAIG C THE JENSEN, SALLY R THE 4245 MESA VISTA DR LA CANADA CA 91011 - 3825 KENNEDY, WALTRAUT M 736 ISLAND WAY # 202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1817 KRECKEL, PATRICK F KRECKEL, ELINOR M 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 304 1314 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3935 HENRY, PATRICK D 321 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3910 JAMES, MILTON C JAMES, ROSE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 JOHNSON, THOMAS EDWARD JOHNSON, GINA 2694 HARVEST DR CONYERS GA 30013 - 2408 KEYSTONEINVESTMENTS 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 6 B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917 KUNHARDT, MARIA D 11050 STRATHMORE DR #312 LOS ANGELES CA 90024 - 1609 KWALL, LOUIS LARSON, CURT R LEIBOLD, FRANK KWALL, JEAN H 2379 OLD COACH TRL 603 N OSCEOLA AVE 133 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1729 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4020 LEONHARDT, GUNTER LEWIS, W A INC LOIZOS, ANASTASIA LEONHARDT, MELINDA C 2617 W GRAND BLVD MERWIN, EUGENIA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 403 DETROIT MI 48208 - 1234 75 MOUNT TOM RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 NEW ROCHELLE NY 10805 - 1216 MADERO,ESPERANZA MADERO,ESPERANZA MADERO, MARIA R 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 102 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 511 GONZALEZ, LIDIA M CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 809 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3915 MANECCHIA, VICTOR MARION, CARISA MEHLER, HORST 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 501 32485 THE OLD RD 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 411 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3938 CASTAIC CA 91 384 - 3054 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 MERWIN, GAIUS W III MESCHOULAM, SAMUEL METHVEN, ALLEN MERWIN, EUGENIA MESCHOULAM, CLARISSE METHVEN, JILL 75 MOUNT TOM RD PALMA CRIOLLA # 4 301 120 SW 7TH ST NEW ROCHELLE NY 10805 - 1216 BOSQUES DE PALMAS DUNDEE OR 97115 - 9535 HUIXQILUCAN 00002 - MEXICO MINKOFF HOLDINGS LTD MISCAVIGE, LORETTA A MORRISHILL INC 403 EDGEWOOD AVE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 104 PO BOX 960 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3931 ST PETERSBURG FL 33731 - 0960 MORSE, DAVID G THE MORSHEAD, JOHN W MOUNT OLIVE AFRICAN METHODIST MORSE, CAROL L THE C C BOX 99-071 11450 RUGGIERO AVE JOHANNESBURG 2000 00000 - 600 JONES ST LAKE VIEW TERRACE CA 91342 - SOUTH AFRICA CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4136 6735 NIERENGARTEN, WARREN B North Myrtle Avenue Association OKUBOYE, JULIUS A NIERENGARTEN, JANICE 1010 Blanche B. Littlejohn Trail OKUBOYE, MICHAEL O 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 203 FI 33755 600 N OSCEOLA AVE Clearwater CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3934 , CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3838 O'LEARY, KIERAN OSCEOLA PROP INC OSCEOLA-JONES PROPERTIES LLC O'LEARY, DONNA PO BOX 960 133 CANDY LN PO BOX 170699 ST PETERSBURG FL 33731 - 0960 PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 5471 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94117 - 0699 OSTERTAG, MARTIN PACE TECH PROPERTIES INC PEENS, LOUIS 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 705 2035 PHILIPPE PKWY 300 N OSCEOLA AVE # 66 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2200 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3917 PEREIRA, JOE X PEREIRA, XOSE PICCONE, ISELLA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 307 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 804 PICCONE, PATRIZIA CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3942 601 N OSCEOLA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3839 SUNSET PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 960 ST PETERSBURG FL 33731 - 0960 TUBBESING, HORST GERLACH-TUBBESING, K 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3934 WADDELL, DAVID E WADDELL, GWEN S 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 709 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3941 WHEATON, MARJORIE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3936 WONG, PATRICK Y WONG, LINDA 10 SOUTHDOWN CT HILLSBOROUGH CA 94010 - 7242 ZAUN, HELGA BREITLING, SANDY GEISELGASTEIG STIR 30 81545 MUNCHEN 90 00004 - GERMANY ZIMMER, MICHAEL S ZIMMER, CHERYL M 555 PARK CIR ELM GROVE WI 53122 - 2553 • THRESHOLD CONSULTING SERV INC 200 N GARDEN AVE STE B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4187 URBANEK, ANTHONY P 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 404 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3937 WEIR, IONE 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 611 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3940 WHITEHURST, LEON JR BASKIN, HAMDEN H III AFD 720 SNUG ISLAND CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1831 WOODRUFF, JOHN W WOODRUFF, CLAIRE B 19291 SLEEPING OAK DR TRABUCO CANYON CA 92679 - ZIMMER, MICHAEL S C/O J W ROBINSON PO BOX 2692 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - Iriangle Development, LLC Attn: Ben Kugler / Thomas Coates 714 N Ft Harrison, Clearwater, FL 33755 URIZARBARRENA, MIKEL FRIAS, BERTA 500 N OSCEOLA AVE # 601 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 3939 WEIR, TIMOTHY J 9009 DEERLAND GROVE RALEIGH NC 27615 - 4178 WILLNER, NEIL A THE WILLNER, EVE K THE 1928 RIMCREST DR GLENDALE CA 91207 - 1044 YOCKENFLOSTER OF CLEARWATER 1670 SPARKLING CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2303 ZIMMER, MICHAEL S ZIMMER, C MARGENE 655 PARK CIR ELM GROVE WI 53122 - C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT . jgTR POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 pis r MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW June 23, 2005 Mr. Thomas Coates Triangle Property Development, LLC. 714 North Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Communitylbpr eat Board Meeting regarding application for Flexible Development approval (FLM03-04034). Dear Mr. Coates: The Flexible Development approval to permit 324 attached dwelling units, a reduction in required non-residential parking from 76 parking spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA) to 17 spaces (0.90 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 150 feet to the roof and up to 174 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, an increase in height from 30 feet to 40 feet (to roof deck), an additional 16 feet for elevator and mechanical equipment overrun (from roof deck) and an additional nine feet (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue and an increase of the permitted density from 205 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. The meeting will take place on July 19, 2005 at 1:00 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558. Sincerely, Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner S: (Planning Departmen6C D BTLEX (FLD) (Pending cases)Up for the next CDBVones 0400 Osceola Jones Condos (D) - MTPVones 0400 CDB Letter. doe BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HAMILTON, COUNCIL.mEMBER BILLJONSON, COLINCIL:MEMBER CARLENA. PETERSEN, COUNCIL.MEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" CITY OF CL*EARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 : MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIFW May 11, 2005 Mr. Thomas Coates Triangle Property Development, LLC. 714 North Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Application for Flexible Development approval (FLD2005-04034) to permit 324 attached dwelling units, a reduction in required parking from 562 parking spaces (1.5 spaces per dwelling unit and four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA for non-residential uses as required by Code) to 485 spaces (1.497 spaces per dwelling unit or 485 spaces and zero spaces for the non-residential component), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 150 feet - eight inches to the roof and up to 174 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, an increase in height from 30 feet to 50 to the roof and up to 58 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue and an increase of the permitted density from 214 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 110 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. Dear Mr. Coates: The Planning staff has reviewed your application for a Flexible Development as outlined above at 400 Jones Street (302, 303, 304, 308, 309, 312, 400, and 404 North Osceola Avenue; 400 and 410 Jones Street; and 410 North Fort Harrison Avenue). After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 2, 2005 in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherrie Watkins, Administrative Analyst at 727.562.4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your client must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. BRIAN J. AUNGSI, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYr HA:MILI'ON, COLINCILMEMBER BILL. JONSON, COUNCIL?MEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENTAND AFFIRMATIVE. ACTION EMPLOYER" May 10, 2005 Coates - Page Two If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4558. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: http://www.myclearwater.com/. Sincerely, Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFlexlPending casesl Up for the next DRCL/ones 0400 Osceola Jones Condos (D)Uones 0400 Complete Letter.doc 0 0 Wielecki, Karl From: Wielecki, Karl Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 9:01 AM To: 'thomas@triangledevelopment.com' Subject: Harrison Village completeness review Thomas, I looked through the submittal, and did not see either the stormwater narrative or the preliminary subdivision plat. Please note that the deadline for resubmittals is May 9, 2005. These items must be received by that deadline to consider the file 'complete'. Please let me know if/when these are to be submitted. Thank you. Karl Wielecki, AICP Planner II City of Clearwater Planning Department 727-562-4553 karl.wielecki@myclearwater.com nh/Y94=4p fS NIA cc4lcS O.rQ r" flu` AA •, -4M do v ?? ? ?'kle \ctwc S oT 1 0 Page 1 of 4 Wielecki, Karl From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:29 AM To: 'thomas' Cc: Wielecki, Karl; Bertels, Paul; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Hardson-Viil ge etc Meeting April 21 st Thomas, We would prefer that the relocated Osceola Ave. remain a public right-of-way. It maintains the grid in Downtown, which we feel is very important. Paul and I discussed and he is in agreement. Paul's concern is maintaining such a high level of streetscape treatment. If there is anything that is too difficult for him to maintain, we can discuss at DRC. There are also other reasons that contributed to the decision and I would be happy to discuss with you. Give me a call if you want. Gina L. Clayton City of Clearwater gina.clayton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 -----Original Message----- From: thomas [mailto:thomas@triangledevelopment.com] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 5:25 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Harrison Village etc Meeting April 21st Cell 5047311 Home 4490544 Work 4460020 From: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com [mailto:Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 2:47 PM To: thomas@triangledevelopment.com Subject: RE: Harrison Village etc Meeting April 21st Thomas - what's your number? -----Original Message----- From: thomas [mailto:thomas@triangledevelopment.com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 3:57 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Harrison Village etc Meeting April 21st Hi Gina Yes, I realized this as we came back to the office. Give me a call and I can go through all the data with you, I have it in spreadsheet form. With the proviso that the site area is slightly flexible right now, it looks like we will be requesting about 4/27/2005 • • Page 2 of 4 85 units from the Pool. This is only a 3% up, ratio-wise, from what we requested before. Thanks Thomas From: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com [mai[to:Gina. Clayton@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 3:22 PM To: thomas@triangledevelopment.com Subject: RE: Harrison Village etc Meeting April 21st Importance: High Thomas I just realized we did not discuss the density pool this afternoon. I know you need additional units and we didn't discuss the additional information. Gina -----Original Message----- From: thomas [mailto:thomas@triangledevelopment.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 6:18 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Harrison Village etc Meeting 12 April Hello Gina I made some talking point sound bite brief notes (whatever you want to call them) on the meeting this morning (they are not minutes) and thought I would send them to you... Welcome Home! All the best Thomas Meeting with Clearwater Planning Dept. April 12th 2005 Gina Clayton City James Bond, Steve Varrell C of S Jim Graham GDA Ed Armstrong Johnson Pope et al. 4/27/2005 ® 0 Page 3 of 4 Ben Kugler, Thomas Coates, Mark Perkins Triangle (These are very rough notes on the talking points for this meeting; they are not minutes.) There are two reasons why we asked for this meeting; first to present Triangle's New Master Plan (and give an explanation of why there is a new Master Plan) and secondly to ensure that our new plan will not adversely effect the future development plans of our neighbor, the Church of Scientology. Last year Triangle and the City staff spent a lot of time and effort coming up with a plan that was not just acceptable to all concerned but very much welcomed. It's only because of the sale of part of our property (to the Church) and the purchase of the contiguous waterfront property (the Rahddert property) that we're coming back to the Planning Dept. We attempted to retain what we had with modifications to the original Development Order but it just wasn't working. What we are going to present we believe retains the best of what we put together in the past with definite improvements for the City, Triangle and the future residents and businesses. Master Plan Note the following points of the new Master Plan (these are still changing): Prior' Current Total Number of Units in Island View 48 279 Total Number of Units in Harrison Village 145 47 Total Units 193 326 Total Area 3.83 ac 5.69 ac Total Parking 339 443 Total Parking on the street. 24 46 Height of Island View 150' 150' Height of Harrison Village 50' 35' Density Pool Request 46(24%) 92(28%) The same Florida Mediterranean Revival look at Harrison Village with clock towers. 20,000 sq ft of retail at Harrison Village that wraps around all corners. For Island View, extensive surveys have produced a twin tower structure that maximizes the use of the waterfront property and allows for more affordable housing at Harrison Village. Robotic Parking still used (and expanded) at Island View. Harrison Village residents and shop owners will use the robotic parking at Island View. Additional on-street parking due to the straightening and widening of Osceola. The privatizing, moving and straightening of Osceola has been met with approval by key city departments: Engineering, Solid Waste, Traffic, and Fire. Key elements will be retained. These are... The look, the original spirit of the place. More specifically, the Mediterranean Revival style, the urban feel, the community character. In harmony with Downtown Old Bay character district. The scale. On HV, the most visible portion, the last approved design was 50' plus; this is around 35'. High. New version has gone from 5 to 3 stories high. Island View is still 150', in two towers with a 50' structure for Robotic Parking on New Osceola (two floors above ground with three floors of units over, 50' high.) The portions of tower at 150' are still to the west of 4/27/2005 0 0 Page 4 of 4 where Osceola was. Density Pool will have a similar draw from it. Bulk and Massing. Less mass on Fort Harrison. Although we felt we handled the apparent bulkiness or the previous version, this building is simply smaller and easier to handle. Stepbacks and setbacks as before. Mixed use character of the development. HV retail and residential. Retail on Fort Harrison. This has remained the same in area but the stores have been configured with greater depths generally. Arcades to traverse the long city block, as well as covered walkways along the retail fronts. Pedestrian-oriented streets, especially Osceola. Extensive Streetscape still taken all around block. Ground floor access units on Osceola side of HV. Street Parking. By moving Osceola and upgrading it from a 40' to 50' ROW we have doubled the number of on-street parking places. Parking all around block. On-site parking (Robotic Parking) still accessed from Osceola. No curb cuts on Fort Harrison. Osceola upgraded form substandard one-way 40'ROW, to two-way 50' ROW, remove two bends. Removed confusing access from south to addresses on Osceola. Increase range of price points, making HV (especially) more financially accessible. HV amenities will include rooftop pool, gazebo, barbecue. Courtyards have been relocated to IV where there is a water view. IV water views have been maximized. IV pool was too small. Increased allocation for amenities in larger building. Corrected amenities imbalance. (Not enough in IV as it was too small to justify what was really needed.) Fire, Engineering, Traffic, Solid Waste all have favorable initial reception. Steve Varrrel reviewed what the C of S plans to build and how being east or west of Osceola may not be an issue; at question are the church and institutional uses for the building. Brief Notes Afterwards... Gina implied ancillary uses may be made for retail in condo block. Attention on the looks of the buildings, she wants to see the new elevations. Enamored of old ones. We need to pump up the design on the entrances to the Arcades. Wants to see final product. Maybe take Osceola name away to handle the problem of east and west. General high level of acceptance. Ed's point on non prohibited uses simply acknowledgeo without acquiescence. C of S issues appear to have more runway in front of them, and my impression was that solutions would be found. 4/27/2005 ? ? • • ORIGINAL _ D JUN 09 2005 4TH LEVEL STH LEVEL TH LEVEL " : 0 : LEVEL 3PD - 7 2RD LEVEL GARAC¢ ENTRANCE 7o-m Z. w 1ST LEVEI ?- 28-0° ISLAND VIEW - EAST ELEVATION SCAM Y - W ORIGINAL JUN Q 9 205 PLANN r ... TOP OF ROOF .,, ... n ® ® 8 PENTHOUSE ' tht main = I:n,a i, {.; 13TH LEVEI - : ® 17TH LEVEL nn In 11 #TH LEVEL ? I o - ? W1H LEVEL A 4 ? ® 11TH LEVEL t:'r p:?`!1 "S;lil. s! in! :.u {. ,, -a:: n ,y ! !'I•. ;ii,? T ®?® 8TH LEVEL ? - ?Iram ? I.'?: !N• . f, $ ® ® ® R "WIN Pa IT" LEVEL 4:a1 n'. uu a .u.. "?.i '.! u,= .. :pl;!•,.; 3... ! ,?' ,1 . ? i, I,i 3 ? 6TH LEVEL li! !"t." NTH LEVEL ' ? 6TH LEVEL eu, ,;! !! m!a, ;u rl?i, l!-,n, ,: ! ,.8 i 5!a i' •- a 'I. MI ! STH LEVEL - co gl en m 4THLEVEI ? a IM 1TH LEVEL 3RD LEVEL a r ?. .- ..... -.. ?._?._ _ __. R In I- . E Eo - 7NOLEVEL -- r,iira!.ur?.• .n.. .a!ca,a, 1'- 7 ;,a,. I Ifil i:" - I!!! 1-1 .i. _ 2RD LEVEL ? o H GARAGE ENTRAHCE? EiT LEVEL r -- -- -,.I f ut` a 4ARACf ENTRANCE - FIST LEVEL 7r O ' I I' 4 1 "I' : " I ' ` ` TV ?f?a.lllll l! 1? ?-? VIII ?+"- ? n VILA 1 1p,A , 11, l. ..i.„AI I 1 II ,& IL III IG, Il.t t!, .I _ f N / ' I ! Hi - VILLA SFF. tr-a? t a a , 0 0-a--- -• ------' ---------O?-O, ---?- ISLAND VIEW - WEST ELEVATION SCALE P • 3d i ORIGINAL JUN 09 2005 IIDI? I ?TrH LEVEL 'TH 1EVEL -_------- C STH LEVEL ------'--- ITH LEVEL J` 3RD LEVEL J? 2ND LEVEL WRAGE?-? ENTRANCE IST LEVEL ISLAND r - SO' 7-P 0 p 1 im t' i L'..:!" ,li ?h: m In c ® rm pq'64 rm In [M E O 2C-Qi vau_ ISLAND VIEW - SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: I'- 3a 61I$L }""m S+ff1A °ARaLLE- PARALLEL °dR<YG C01 I ERCIAL I CO I"=RCIAL IF1 o OZD CONCRETE ?ORVA7E LA...° PC- CAST C^NCRET- 3ESC4 AND TRAS4 CAV PAYERS CONCRETE BASDyG 4ANDICAPPED- . 54ADE TREE - - RA, JOKES ST. - .LAN I( SCALL: I" _ 1.0'-0' o'o-? olo B C0i a IERCIAL .,R- A914 CAN BEXC4 BOLLARDS CA57 CC\C@EiE °AVERS 4A\D:CAPPED RA"P I ?t ORIGINAL I I_FI"CCili 0 S' !'o' 32' GRAP2C YAI _ JONFS ST. - EI_E.VATION u'v 9 \ , is v m.a. SCALE: 1- . 4."-0" 17 I ?. q... ----------------- C^ =RCIAL r CO`' ERCIAL CO"i IERCIAL SCORED PAT7ERED CONCRETE SCORED PA''ERED CONCRETE GRASS ? ? :auwMaaac . AQA-L-- 9:? CK \? PdRAL_L °aEc<NG Icy,/ E L v R I I^-- ?aRA_LE_ Pr?R<IVG D . " PdRIC NG TQA,\SFCR"ER 3-\C^ FOUNidIY CA57 CONCR vAS COSCRE7E -CRVd7E LA ,-,P RACK ELA,-,P POST. C?L\ATE _A"P POST PAVERS PAYERS PALM i.REE O¢\ATE LA-P P^5T PALM 7R"EE OC\CRE7E 3dVDIV'• CONCR-ETE BANDNG SaADE 71REE 5JAX 'REE T.RASE CAN FT. ?aARRIS01\ PLAN SCALE: I" . 40'-0- G c' i g 4'•tltl A - cA ? IIl 7 a Zw I- Q I I 0 U ? S h `( I. u 0 N a w a U f- w IJ H V) n 71: I < ? a No V) .rc Iw J d I W V) t? C lu L ? I11 ? ^ V Y I u y ? a w J v o U Q U J y o :il o Z ? n p C] 3 u aj . ` cr I Q f V 7-OMAS Op-A' VCE.I„E NO. AA COOOtS2 O' I; UA,k RE onAA% oa ^?z g2'An_ 9'rR9 QBt<'L I 0.8va'Ctl I. f CLiA': ? B'A'RB ?? ?M'AI. I. FT. HARRISO\I - ELEVATION SCALE: I- • 40'-0" i AQA_LEL GGrM??GAL CCM i°_2C14? ,?PAEC \G PaRe_LEL a U F] - SGC?ED PA'TECD '1 CONCRETE G Ej R I A S I R E_ T CRnAU _A"P PCsT CAST CONCRETE BE\CH AVO 79RAS-4 CA\ PAVERS CC\CRE T E EIANDIK-. 4A\DCAOPED S4ADE TREE ° GEORGIA - °L AN SCA-E: 1.. = 4C,'-O- h ?'?-? \ _ 1/'."? - top I\ T? \. - 010,`_ all Its 06 I' GEORGIA - ELEVATION SCALE: - a0' 1 ?'1 a Ili TI m ? fl I I I ?RALLE! PA R4ING LTREE 1. 'AST CONCRETE AVERS CONCRETE BANDIw • --STUCCO A\D ALb..\,M °RIVAC- WALL OSCECLA - PLAN SLUE: - 40'-0"? o?ucw nv? a_7nlw,- PRP/ACY JALL OSCEOLA - ELEVATION SCALE: I" . 40'-0" ORIGINAL ,L ?i_ahrNlN( ^m I 0 Zo' 32' oA' GRAP4IC SCALE P PCS / \\ 3E?C4 3OLLARDS TRAS4 CAN n I "l0 3' 2µ I 9i?Q?l eE•An_ ?,, ? III /? Ill ? J Q I u W 0 Y F b .G In QW III (1! u Q l /Opry1•?^^M?rA A4rf+ rn.,r?pp.rphrA brmirwh wlrirrYlsp ara.TF? ungWfn+N -'MM NipwYy III E1 U (n r W W n LY o O G W ?J V 1 J ?( w a u W ?' .IJ v r•? h W v p J Q " m J S O j ? 1J O \ / W ^^G lJ 1 Cn t % .. 7UOrA5 : . G¢A-A'; LICENSE a0 AA COC0752 Oo-I; orE w CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEr ,RWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 21, 2005 Mr. Thomas Coates Triangle Property Development, LLC. 714 North Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 RE: Development Order - FLD2005-04034 - 400 Jones Street Dear Mr. Coates: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On July 19, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit 324 attached dwelling units with a reduction in required non-residential parking from 76 parking spaces (four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA) to 17 parking spaces (0.90 spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA); an increase to the permitted height from 30' to 150' to the roof and up to 174' for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue; an increase to the height from 30' to 40' (to roof deck); an additional 16' for elevator and mechanical equipment overrun (from roof deck); an additional 9' (from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue; and an increase to the permitted density from 205 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 119 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. The CDB APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-903.C.; 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Vision, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Old Bay character district; 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts; and 5. The proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the nonresidential uses proposed to be located on the site be consistent with the permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to the CDB, and be approved by Staff-, BRIAN I. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYI' HA-MILTON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILME:MBER CARLEN A. PETFRSEN, COLINCIUMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AC'noN EMPLOYER" 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right(s)-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as hart of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: (a) All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and (b) All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That evidence of filing of a Unity of Title with Pinellas County is submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 10. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (January 18, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; 11. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 12. That the boundary of the project/right-of-way along the southwest side of the site along North Osceola Avenue on the survey and all supporting site plans are corrected prior to the issuance of any building permits; 13. That North Osceola Avenue will be improved per City standards to accommodate two-way traffic between Jones Street and Georgia Street to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 14. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 15. That all streetscaping along Harrison Village be installed to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Harrison Village; and 16. That all streetscaping along Island View be installed to the satisfaction of Staff prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Island View. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of Flexible Development approval (by July 19, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. r ,-Alff. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 2, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(a,myclearwater.com. , Sincerely, Michae elk, CP Planning Director riy 1e IT .g OEVELOPtL1ENT COMPANY, LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT For 400 JONES STREET Being NEW COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-STORY RESIDENTIAL CONDO DEVELOPMENT AT 302, 304, 308, 312, 314, 400, 404 AND 303, 309 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE; 400, 410 JONES STREET AND 410 N. FORT HARRISON, DOWNTOWN CLEARWATER Submission to the DRC, 28th April 2005 REPLY TO WRITTEN COMMENTS, 2 June 2005 Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 2, 2005 - Page 15 1. Pm not sure the math is working on page two of 33 with regard to the ratio figures on the bottom of the page. I think the original ratio was for 24% not 31 %; Previously approved ratio between units request/ allowed was 191/146, or an increase of 24%, calculated thus 191-146=45. 45/191=24% This application, calculated in the same manner, runs like this. Ratio between units requested/allowed is 214/324 or an increase of 24%. Calculated thus 324-214=110. 110/324=34% You are right! 2. The math appears incorrect in the narrative on page two of 33 with regard to the number of units proposed for Island View - 116 + 143 + 40 = 299 not 279.299 + 45 = 344 not 324. Although 279 + 45 does equal 324 so I'll assume that the total number of desired units for Island View is 279 and there's a tpyo somewhere in the fromula; Total unit count is 324. Island View is 116 +143 + 20 = 249. Harrison Village is 45. Sorry for the tpyo. 3 . Clarify the amount of property lost from the project and gained to the project (I figure it a loss of about 12,000 sq.ft. and a gain of about 78,426 sq.ft.; Yes. About that. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOCO)TRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 1 OF 3 ???Tri 1e g DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater 6 . It does not appear that there will be any surface parking on the Island View parcel. Is this true?' Yes. All parking, including guest parking occurs within the Robotic Parking facility. 7 . It looks like there are two driveways for the parking garage - one way in and one way out plus two additional drives for drop off - am I (reading this correctly? The accesses (called Entry/Exit Stations) to the robotic Parking are bi-directional. In other words traffic enters and exits, into and from, the same place. Traffic flow is handled by signage (red and green lights). There is an additional drop-off driveway at each entrance. 8 . Clarify what the garage doors are doing on the east facade of Island View and how they operate in context of site circulation. The design guidelines don't permit garage doors along North Osceola Avenue; The "garage doors" in the drawing are actually the enclosures for the Robotic parking Entry/Exit Stations. They are set well back from Osceola, about 50 ft, from the street. I believe the restriction on garage doors applies to townhouses only. Actually the only really feasible access to the site is off Osceola. 9 . Is there a way to better treat the center part of the six story connector between the north and south towers on Island View. It feels like it should be the pivot point between the two towers but it feels like it got a little lost; This has been noted and is being addressed. 10 . Can we more forcefully address the entrances for the north and south towers for Island View - the building as a whole is a grand building but there don't seem to be grand entrances; This has been noted and is being addressed. 11 How is solid waste handled on the site - it appears that all solid waste for both portions of the project end up at two dumpsters and two compactors at the southeast corner of Island View; Yes. This is a relatively central location, away from main entrances but still easily accessible to the Guys from Solid Waste. We have met with them and the location and layout have their preliminary blessing. 14. Provide a breakdown between retail and office space; Not allocated as yet. Clarify where the retail spaces are accessed - I assume off North Fort Harrison Avenue but also from Georgia and Jones Streets?; From all of the above streets, as well as the north and south ends of Osceola. Door locations will be finalized as tenant requirement s become known. 16 . Clarify how the residential units are accessed from Georgia and Jones Streets; TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRI513N AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: INFOOTRIANGLEDEVELOPMENT.COM 2OF3 Trl I e DEVELOPMENTfOMPA LLC Helping Revitalize Downtown Clearwater The main entrance and elevators are located centrally on Osceola. Secondary (stair) access is from the either of the two arcades that cross the block from Fort Harrison to Osceola, at the north and south ends of the building. Additionally, the ground floor residential units on Osceola will have street level access. 17. Where will employees for the retail businesses park; Allocation will be made in the Island View Robotic Parking facility. 19 . There doesn't seem to be a great deal of loading/unloading/drop-off area for Harrison Village. Clarify how people will move into the building with regard to parking moving trucks and the like; More laybys will be provided. 20 . This is to confirm that the clubhouse located on Island View be used by residents of just Island View; Yes, exclusively. Harrison Village will have its own facilities, including a rooftop pool, barbecue area and gazebo. 23 . What prices with the units be going for?; From $275,000 for a non-water-facing one-bedroom unit to $2m for a double penthouse. Average in the $600k range. Clarify the process and timing of the vacation and realignment of North Osceola Avenue. Also, clarify that the realigned North Osceola Avenue will be a City street and not simply an easement Briefly (this is the subject of rather a long evolution), a new eastern Osceola will be constructed, services and all, to the point just before asphalting is done. This will be available for use by Emergency services only. It will be gated at either end and be kept free of construction equipment and materials, as the Harrison Village site will be used for the initial staging of the construction for the Island View project. (This staging is possible because the construction process on the smaller Harrison Village building will be much faster than Island View. Harrison Village will start later and finish at the same time as Island View.) At the same time as the full Island View and Harrison Village construction is completed, the new Osceola will be finished and opened. 29. Will a new cd on the robotic parking be submitted to refresh the CDB members' memory; Yes. TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 71 4 NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FL 33755 TEL: 727 446 0020 FAX: 727 446 0002 EMAIL: IN FOPTRIANGLEOEVELOPM ENT. COMENT. COM 3 OF 3 10.20 am Case Number: FLD2005-04034 -- 400 JONES ST Owner(s): Osceola-Jones Properties Lle 133 Candy Ln Palm Harbor, Fl 34683 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Owner(s): Osceola Jones Properties, Llc 411 Cleveland Street Clearwater, Fl 33755 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Thomas Coates 411 Cleveland Steer Clearwater, Fl TELEPHONE: 727-446-0020, FAX: 727446-7531, E-MAIL: COATESTHOMAS@EARTHLINK.N ET Location: 5.14 acres generally located on the west side of North Fort Harrison Avenue bound by Jones Street to the south, Georgia Street to the north and Clearwater Harbor to the west. Atlas Page: 277B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval (FLD2005-04034) to permit 324 attached dwelling units, a reduction in required parking from 562 parking spaces (1.5 spaces per dwelling unit and four spaces per 1,000 square feet GFA for non-residential uses as required by Code) to 485 spaces (1.497 spaces per dwelling unit or 485 spaces and zero spaces for the non-residential component), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 150 feet - eight inches to the roof and up to 174 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the west side of North Osceola Avenue, an increase in height from 30 feet to 50 to the roof and up to 58 feet for architectural embellishments for the portion of the site on the east side of North Osceola Avenue and an increase of the permitted density from 214 dwelling units to 324 dwelling units by using 110 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood North Myrtle Avenue Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33755 1010 Blanche B Littlejohn Trai TELEPHONE: 727-443-3699, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Mark Parry, Consulting Planner Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 2, 2005 - Page 13 1. Submit complete application to vacate the following easements, alley, and Osceola Avenue street right-of-way: a. Drainage and utility easement retained overvacated alley described in O.R. 7270-1731. b. Drainage and utility easement retained over vacated alley described in O.R. 7546-607. c. Drainage and utility easement retained overvacated alley described in O.R. 7270-1731. d. Drainage and utility easement retained overvacated alley described in O.R. 7519-329. e. Ingress-egress easement described in O.R. 7540-275. f Remaining east-west alley portion not vacated to west of vacated alley portion described in O.R. 7546-607,608. g. Vacate that portion of Osceola Avenue that is located between the north right-of-way line of Jones Street and the proposed emergency access roadway shown on the plans. (contact Steve Doherty 727-562-4773). 2. Note: No portion of Georgia Street has been vacated Hest of North Ft. Harrison Avenue. Any portion of "emergency access drive" located within this street right-of-way shall remain accessible to the public. 3. Applicant shall install a handicap ramp for public sidewalks at Osceola Avenue and Jones Street and for the sidewalk along Osceola Avenue. Applicant shall also provide a handicap ramp at the intersection of Georgia Street and Forth Fort Harrison Avenue in the same alignment of the sidewalk north of the intersection. 4. A minimum vertical clearance of 14 feet shall be provided for vehicular access beneath proposed pone-cocheres All of the above io be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Applicant shall bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacentto or a part of the development up to standard, including A.D.A. (Note truncated domes per F.D.O.T. Index#304). 2. Installation of water lines is the responsibility of the contractor. City of Clearwater will install water meters and backflow prevention devices and operate water valves as necessary. 3. All fire lines greater than 10 feet in length shall be ductile iron pipe. 4. Water pipes shall be restrained by approved mechanical restraints only - use of thrust blocks is not permitted. 5. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f. [sidewalks shall NOT to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. 6. Separate right-of-way permits shall be obtained prior to construction of brick paver sidewalks. Brick pavers shall be installed in accordance with index #113 of the City of Clearwater's Contract Specifications and Standards Furthermore, sidewalk streetscape design shall be consistent with the approved streetscape components of the downtown redevelopment plan. Final approval for the design from the Economic Development and Housing Department is required. 7. Separate right-of-way permit(s) shall be obtained prior to any utility connection or construction within a City street right-of-way. 8. All sanitary sewer construction shall be in accordance with all applicable city requirements. Applicant shall include applicable City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards indices in plans. 9. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and water meter. Ductile iron pipe must be installed between any tap and backflow preventor device. At least one joint of ductile iron pipe shall be installed on the service side of any backflow preventor device. 10. All polyvinyl chloride pipes shall be laid with an insulated 12 gauge A.W.G. solid strand copper wire wound around the pipe forming one complete spiral per joint of pipe. This wire is to be continuous with splices made only by methods approved by the Engineer. This wire is to be secured to all valves, tees and elbows See City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Part "B", Technical Specifications, Section IV, Article 41.02(B)(2). General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 2, 2005 - Page 14 More information needed to evaluate-please define jurisdictional wetland lines Fire: A vegetative buffer shall be provided on all lands within 25 feet of wetlands- Please revise plans to indicate buffer zone. Development Standards, Article 3, Section 3-907 Please provide copy of application for SWFWMD permit. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Provide a standpipe with 2%' outlet and 1'/i' adapter within 100 ft of the pier/land intersection for any docks/piers. An approved water supply shall be provided within 100 ft of the pier/land intersection for fire department connection serving fire protection systems. As per NFPA-303. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . Show to be saved tree #15 and 24 prior to building permit. 2. Show to be removed tree # 5,6,7,18,19,2226,98,99,100and all other trees rated #2 orbelow prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 no issues. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. More details needed - site data table and number of existing structures. Stormwater: I . Prior to issuance of a building permit: 1) The Engineer is to construct a storm pipe system in the relocated Osceola Ave. that meets SWFWMD and City of Clearwater engineering requirements. 2) A cross section through the weir at the retention pond is to be shown on the construction plans. There is some concern that the weir may create soil erosion into Clearwater Harbor. A possible alternative may be a control structure with a pipe outfall. Solid Waste: 1 . That dumpster service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. Provide signage or other safety devices to alert motorists of pedestrians at mid-block crosswalks. 2.Stop bar(s) and stop sign(s) must be 4' behind the pedestrian paver crosswalk(s). 3. Roadway widths and curb radius must meet Fire Department's approval. 4. Show the pathway (ingress/egress) of a scaled WB-40 truck in/out of the two drop off areas of the condominium complex. 5. Where will moving vans/trucks stage for unloading and loading of large household items? 6. Show 20'x 20'sight visibility triangles at all driveways and access points. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. 7. Provide Do Not Enter sign(s) for egress driveway per current MUTCD standards. 8. Provide directional pavernent arrows for both ingress and egress of automated garage driveway(s). 9. Install "end of roadway markers" (3C-4) at the north end of old Osceola Avenue and "dead end sign" (WI 4- 1) at the old Osceola Avenue/Jones Avenue intersection per current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards. All of the above to be addressed prior-to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 2, 2005 - Page 15 I . I'm not sure the math is working on page two of 33 with regard to the ratio figures on the bottom of the page. I think the original ratio was for 24% not 31 %; 2. Start counting height at BFE on the elevations and inlcude height for any architectural embellishments. Generally, I want the proposed height for the buildings and all portions thereof to be very clear in the site data table and on the scaled/dimensioned elevations; 3 . The math appears incorrect in the narrative on page two of 33 with regard to the number of units proposed for Island View - 116 + 143 + 40 = 299 not 279. 299 + 45 = 344 not 324. Although 279 + 45 does equal 324 so I'll assume that the total number of desired units for Island View is 279 and there's a tpyo somewhere in the fromula; 4 . Clarify the amount of poperty lost from the project and gained to the project (I figure it a loss of about 12,000 sq.ft. and a gain of about 78,426 sq.ft.; 5 . Clarify the heavy dashed line on the east side of Island View; 6 . It does not appear that there will be any surface parking on the Island View parcel. Is this truer 7 . Sheet 3 of 12 is missing; 8 . It looks like there are two driveway for the parking garage - one way in and one way outplus two additional drives for drop off - am I (reading this correctly?;; 9. Clarify what the garage doors are doing on the east facade of Island View and how they operate in context of site circulation. The design guidelines don't permit garage doors along North Osceola Avenue; 10. Is there a way to better treat the center part of the six story connector between the north and south towers on Island View. It feels like it should be the pivot point betwen the two towers but it feels like it got a little lost; 11 . Can we more forcefully address the entrances for the north and south towers for Island View - the building as a whole is a grand building but there don't seem to be grand entrances; 12 . How is solid waste handled on the site - it appears that all solid waste for both portions of the project end up at two dumpsters and two compactors at the southeast comer of Island View; 13 . Provide setbacks along realigned North Occeola Avneue for Harrison Village; 14. Provide a breakdown between retail and office space; 15 . Clarify where the retail spaces are accessed - I assume off North Fort Harrison Avenue but also from Georgia and Jones Streets?; 16. Clarify how the residential units are access from Georgia and Jones Streets; 17 . Where will employees for the retail businesses park; 18 . A note pointing to storefront windows is on Sheet A18 but points to what appear to be residential portions of the building - this needs to be corrected; 19. Clarify that the main entrances to the dwelling units along North Osceola Avenue "face" North Osceola Avenue by providing proper front doors; 20. There doesn't seem to be a great deal of loading/unloading/drop-off area for Harrison Village. Clarify how people will move into the building with regard to parking moving trucks and the like; 21 . This is to confirm that the clubhouse located on Island View be used by residents of just Island View; 22. Provide a scale on Sheets STI, the plan view on Sheet ST2, plan view on Sheet ST6 and 7; 23 . What prices with the units be going for?; 24. Clarify the process and timing of the vacation and realignment of North Osceola Avenue. Also, ® clarify that the realigned North Osceola Avenue will be a City street and not simply an easement # (or not as the case may be); 25 . Clarify the existing width of North Osceola (I figure it to be about 40 feet of right-of-way and 20 feet of pavement. Clarify the proposed North Osceola Avenue right-of-way and paving width; 26. The landscape plan and the streetscape plans don't match with regard to landscape material location - I think that what we need to do is have one set of combined streetscape and landscape r plans; 27. At some point we are going to have to get down to the details of the streetscape plan such as street light and bolard types, paving materials and patters, bench type - basically a full materials list. It would be a good idea to coordinate with Tim Kurtz (562.4737) with Public Works; 28 . Provide one set of rendered, scaled, dimension elevatations; 29. Will a new cd on the robotic parking be submitted to refresh the CDB members memory; Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 2, 2005 - Page 16 ?--ti?? Yri?, ?? ,l 4--(Z-E . thtrr??,t_Illb?e_l_7sFruv9_?ew v?ams r?ka' Ra6Qsi?w-- a,?9 _t?u?fe?-?u?l??m h?tgl!?s m ?{=+?aYVsn_?., EEn_?u?G -gyp 3S! ? AleacQ a_-(eu) w?o?reJl?ufs_fra_+-_deet CP. S?._ ic9? _.SfOyt?S -? IMSf??7 ry[ ?YV_?tPS l1 i J ?f l M-44 14 C. ? VIA ? el& S aoo `? 30JfloQ ??rv° ?P $D?v z? !1.7 3?5 -32S 18 April 2005 a w 0 /ru i zv?fl Sheet ISLAND VIEW Two high rise towers, both 15 stories in height. The North Tower will have 113, the South Tower 139, luxury condo units. Almost all will have water views. 1-bed 990sf 2-bed 1,300sf 2-bed + den 1,650sf 3-bed 1,800sf 3-bed + den 1,870sf 4 bed (penthouse) 2,470sf The Garden Building will be a low rise, 5 stories in height, with 20 units. Half of these will have direct water views and the rest will have city views. Full amenities will be provided for all the residents of Island View; an Olympic size pool, two hot tubs, cooking area with top-of-the-line barbecues, lavish Clubhouse with meeting facilities and entertainment room, fitness center. The existing dock will be refurbished, and a garden gazebo built for full use of the white sand beaches in front of Island View. Robotic parking will be provided for fast, secure, safe and easy parking below the Garden Building. Access will be from Osceola Avenue which will be fully streetscaped. 24-hour security control for all the buildings. HARRISON VILLAGE A low-rise three story building. Street level retail (restaurant, deli, coffee shop, bookstore approximately 20,000 sf) along Fort Harrison, Jones and Georgia. Covered walkways along the retail front and extensive streetscaping around the entire block. Additionally, the block is crossed at two places with an internal arcade. Above the retail, two floors of 40 high-quality residential condo units. As far as amenities go, there will be a full-size pool, a hot tub, and a covered barbecue area, all on the rooftop. NEIGHBORHOOD New Public Library, Pinellas Trail, new bridge to the Beach, Downtown Clearwater, SandCastle Religious retreat. Prelimina All designs and planning shown and described are preliminary and subject to change. Triangle Development Company, LLC 714 North Fort Harrison Avenue, Clearwater, Fl 33755 Tel: 727 446 0020 fax: 727 446 0002 email: info@trianciledevelopment.com Harrison Village and Island View Steve Varrall Landlord CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGy 319 South Garden Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727 467 6955 Cell: 727 423 5338 Fax: 727 445 7277 F,Alafl: flblandlord Q i' pnet LANDLORD OFFICE ORIGINAL A? Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. • • • • • • JUN 09 NAS • PLAN ENT • PWAtR • • • ORIGIN4L, • HARRISON VILLAGE - ISLAND VIEW • • • • • • • • • PREPARED FOR: • TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT, INC. • • • • • • PREPARED BY: • GULF COAST CONSULTING, INC. • REVISED APRIL 2005 • PROJECT # 04-055 • • • • Robert Pergol & j P • AICP # 9023 • • • • u ORIGINAL. L INTRODUCTION Triangle Development, Inc. seeks to redevelop the site to contain 319 condominium/townhouse units and 20,000 square feet of specialty retail shops. The site is • located on the west side of N. Fort Harrison Avenue between Jones Street and Georgia Street and west of Osceola Avenue north of Jones Street. (See Figure 1). The site will have access to Osceola Avenue only, and Osceola Avenue will be realigned between Georgia Street and Jones Street to eliminate curves and provide for two-way traffic. According to the City of • Clearwater Comprehensive Plan, N. Fort Harrison Avenue is a two-lane Principal Arterial. The Pinellas County MPO 2003 Level of Service Report estimates N. Fort Harrison generally operates at LOS C during peak hour. The City of Clearwater requires a Traffic Impact Study to determine the impact of new development. This analysis was prepared to comply with those requirements by analyzing, in detail, the existing and expected operating conditions with the project. This report is a revision to a previously approved report prepared in August 2004 for a project approved by the CDB on January 18, 2005. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing conditions were established by conducting PM peak period (4-6 PM) traffic counts at the following locations in August 2004. ? D - • • Fort Harrison Avenue / Drew Street • Fort Harrison Avenue / Jones Street JUN O 9 2005 Fort Harrison Avenue / Seminole Street Osceola Avenue / Georgia Street PONNIN .t p 3FN7,u • In addition, 48-hour traffic counts were obtained from the Pinellas County MPO (con uc e May 2003) which shows the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is 20,500 vehicles per day. The PM peak hour traffic counts conducted by GCC were converted to annual averages using FDOT seasonal adjustment factors. Existing intersection conditions were analyzed using the 2000 Highwa C acity Manual _y 0 (HCM) procedures as replicated by the HCS 2000 software. Existing PM peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 2, the HCS printouts, ARTPLAN printouts, and traffic count summaries are included in Appendix A. The signalized intersection at N. Fort Harrison Avenue / Drew Street presently operates at LOS C with average delay of 34.4 seconds per vehicle. The signalized intersection at N. Fort Harrison Avenue / Seminole Street presently operates at LOS A with average delay being 7.2 seconds per vehicle. The signal timings established by FDOT and the City of Clearwater are highly favorable to N. Fort Harrison Avenue at this location. At N. Fort Harrison Avenue / Jones Street northbound and southbound, left turns operate at LOS A and LOS B and eastbound / westbound approaches operate at LOS C. North Fort Harrison Avenue is a two lane roadway with a continuous center turn and a posted speed of 30 MPH between Drew Street and Myrtle Avenue. North of Myrtle Avenue, N. . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 • • PROJECT LOCATION 0 = TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT' NO: PROJECT LOCATION 04-055 DATE: FIGURE: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. os/2oo4 Land Development Consulting DR"RN BY: E.J.C. SUNSET POINT RD RI FMTNnLF ST FT nRMCvF CT • • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • t • c • • N N.T.S 6141 1 ORIGINAL 1046 a L 20 M w 8 ---- 27 I t L 15 _ SEIVH43 NOLE ST 2 IF 31-- r 70- -- 7? to M o+ >. 26:71 J z O M ? c0 I o L 14 4 GEORGIA ST L!=JUN09 - 24 - d 43 24 ' Y OF CCERl?IA rmI F67 t ?. 65, I 1 i 1009 W z0 2 It Q? (0 N ?- 0 14 j 1 L 2 JONES ST W> _? d -- qtr '"a p 33 1 - u") 00 W U 25 ? oo O 6671 _ Z j1 1005 L coo N M r" 65 - 254 --- sos L s7 _ DRE386 W ST r 580 -- 257 1 462- 312 Mo 11? ?00 co ® = TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT NO: [EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC (2004) 04-055 DATE: FIGURE: Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. os/2oo4 Land Development Consulting DR NM BI-: E.J.C. JrJ uNOSm05 Q ORIGINAL Fort Harrison Avenue is a two lanstlydiiidl?4v with a posted speed of 35 MPH. Per HCM criteria, N. Fort Harrison between Drew Street and Sunset Point Road is characteristic of a Class 3 urban arterial. This section is controlled by traffic signals at Drew Street, Seminole Street, and Sunset Point Road. Due to infrequent traffic signal interruptions and high favorable signal timings, traffic operations are smoother than most two lane arterials. Based on the seasonally adjusted traffic counts, the segment of N. Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew Street and Seminole Street carries 1,660 vehicles and the segment of N. Fort Harrison Avenue between Seminole Street and Myrtle Avenue carries 1,660 vehicles during the PM peak hour. As expected, traffic is highly directional northbound during this time of day. The section of N. Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew Street and Myrtle Avenue was analyzed using the FDOT ARTPLAN software which allows specific inputs of signal spacing, signal timings, and directional characteristics, and analyzes LOS based on peak direction. Per the ARTPLAN analysis, the 1.04 mile section operates at LOS B with an average travel speed of 27.4 MPH. This is consistent with the findings of the MPO 2003 Level of Service Report. III. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Background traffic typically includes general traffic growth from nearby approved projects and is typically a function of available vacant land being developed. The Downtown Clearwater area is primarily built-out; any new development is redevelopment of older residential uses into condominiums. Historical traffic counts from FDOT's traffic count station north of Cedar Street show traffic levels have been consistent for several years. Year 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 AADT 21,730 21,730 21,342 21,235 20,500 As such, background traffic is essentially the same as existing traffic. IV. FUTURE CONDITIONS Per the approved methodology trip generation estimates for the proposed development were made using ITE Trip Generation, 7`h Edition. Per ITE, the project would generate 2,219 daily vehicle trips of which 162 would occur during the AM peak hour (51 entering/1I I exiting) and 175 would occur during the PM peak hour (99 entering/76 exiting). Trip generation is shown in Table 1. Table 1 - Trio Generation Land Use Amount LUC Daily AM PM (Enter/Exit) (Enter/Exit) High-Rise Condo/Townhouse 319 D.U. 232 1,333 108(21/87) 121(75/46) Specialty Retail 20,000 s.f. 814 886 54(30/24) 54(24/30) TOTAL 2,219 162 51/111 175(99/76) Although existing uses will be removed, thereby reducing net traffic generation from the site, this analysis evaluates the full impact of the project to be conservative. • ' ORIGINAL • The peak period on N. Fort Harrison Avenue is the PM peak hour since it is heavily • influenced by commuter traffic and daily traffic counts obtained by FDOT confirm the PM peak hour volume is greater than AM peak hour volume. Therefore, the critical analysis period on N. Fort Harrison Avenue is the PM peak hour. • • Per the approved methodology project was distributed to N. Fort Harrison Avenue according • to the following percentages: • • 60% South on N. Fort Harrison • • 40% North on N. Fort Harrison • Aside from on-street parking on Osceola Avenue to serve retail uses, the majority of parking • would occur in the garage west of Osceola Avenue. Traffic was assigned to N. Fort Harrison Avenue via Jones Street; however, traffic exiting the project onto Osceola Avenue to travel • north was assigned to Seminole Street where a traffic signal provides safer access to N. Fort • Harrison Avenue. • Project traffic was added to the background traffic to estimate total traffic at project buildout. • Total PM peak hour traffic volume is shown in Figure 3. The intersections were reanalyzed • and the project driveway to N. Fort Harrison Avenue was analyzed using the HCS 2000 software and the printouts are included in Appendix B. • When project traffic is added, the N. Fort Harrison Avenue / Drew Street intersection would operate at LOS D with 39.5 seconds average delay. The N. Fort Harrison Avenue / Seminole • Street intersection would continue to operate at LOS A during the PM peak hour with • average delay being 7.9 seconds per vehicle. At N. Fort Harrison Avenue / Jones Street, northbound and southbound left turns would continue to operate at LOS A and B and the • eastbound/westbound approaches would continue to operate at LOS C. The project • driveways to Osceola Avenue would provide full access and serve minimal traffic volume. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • The 1.04 mile section of N. Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew Street and Myrtle Avenue was reanalyzed using the ARTPLAN software. With project impacts, this section would continue to operate at LOS C with an average travel speed of 22.1 MPH. During the PM peak hour N. Fort Harrison Avenue would carry 1,777 vehicles south of Jones Street, and 1,730 vehicles north of Seminole Street. The slight increase in traffic volume and corresponding decrease in average travel speed is within acceptable limits. V. CONCLUSION The proposed Harrison Village - Island View project would generate 2,219 daily trips of which 162 would occur during the AM peak hour and 175 would occur during the PM peak hour. This analysis was completed in accordance with a methodology established with the City of Clearwater and the results show that acceptable levels of service will be maintained with the project. v JUN 09 ;2005 PLA R VCS • 6 5 4 • N °? . M • i L • f 1076 ? ORIGINS. 20 15 ? SEMINOLE ST • 17- . M 0) >- Q ? 26 ? • N.T.S M • d N ?(6 • 14 40 f- 54 • REDESIGNED ? GEORGIA ST OSCEOLA AVENUE • c 24 rn • 7 ENTRANCE 0 • 30 46 U) Lo • • 't ?- 73 0) (O N [- 2 f- 0 • L 154 L ?2 • w . 33 - 79 - 7 ? q t r < 1 - d00 • Q Q 71 °o • 0 713 • U 1064 •_ v? O 'oM NrdM 95 Z -254 a • i 508 F- 67 v 1 ¦ • ? ---iii-----JJJ 1 257 580 312 - • s 11 E 0 • q" O ox o? • FUTURE PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC • Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. • q Land Development Consulting • Z 'Y • =v y L • g Z ,p i A D JUN 09 2005 JONES ST 30% 416 DREW ST qtr 485- 00 DATE: 04/2005 DRAWN BY: G.J.S. • = TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT NO: 04-055 FIGURE: 3 . } O • ORIGINAL APPENDIX A D JUN 0 9 q U5 *Print Cate: Jun/10/2004 0 O PINELLA.S COUNTYWME .Category: 1500 0 p M R cam, ?? ,, o C" Florida Deaarmment of Tranworration Transportation Statistics Office 2003 Peak Season Factor Catesory Report Week Dates SF PSCF 1 01/01/2003 - 01/04/2003 1.05 1.12 2 01/05/2003 - 01/1112003 1.05 1.12 3 01/12/2003 - 01/18/2003 1.05 1.12 4 01/19/2003 - 01/25/2003 1.03 1.10 5 01/26/2003 - 02/01/2003 1.00 1.06 6 02/02/2003 - 02/08/2003 0.98 1.04 * 7 02/09/2003 - 02/15/2003 0.96 1.02 * 8 02/16/2003 - 02122/2003 0.95 1.01 * 9 02/23/2003 - 03/01/2003 0.94 1.00 * 10 03/02/2003 - 03/08/2003 0.93 0.99 * 11 03/09/2003 - 03/15/2003 0.93 0.99 * 12 03/1612003 - 03/22/2003 0.93 0.99 * 13 03/23/2003 - 03/29/2003 0.93 0.99 * 14 03/30/2003 - 04105/2003 0.93 0.99 * 15 04/06/2003 - 04/12/2003 0.93 0.99 * 16 04/13/2003 - 04/19/2003 0.94 1.00 * 17 04/20/2003 - 04/26/2003 0.95 1.01 * 18 04/27/2003 - 05/03/2003 0.96 1.02 * 19 05/04/2003 - 05/10/2003 0.97 1.03 20 05/11/2003 - 05/17/2003 0.98 1.04 21 05/18/2003 - 05/24/2003 0.99 1.05 22 05/25/2003 - 05/31/2003 0.99 1.05 23 06/01/2003 - 06/07/2003 1.00 1.06 24 06/08/2003 - 06/14/2003 1.00 1.06 25 06/15/2003 - 06/21/2003 1.01 1.07 26 06/22/2003 - 06/28!2003 1.00 1.06 27 06/29/2003 - 07/05/2003 1.00 1.06 28 07/06/2003 - 07/12/2003 1.00 1.06 29 07/13/2003 - 07/19/2003 1.00 1.06 30 07/20/2003 - 07/26/2003 1.00 1.06 31 07/27/2003 - 08/02/2003 1.00 1.06 32 08/03/2003 - 08/09/2003 1.01. 1.07 33 08/10/2003 - 08/1612003 1.01 1.07 34 08/17/2003 - 08/23/2003 1.02 1.09 35 08/24/2003 - 08/30/2003 1.03 1.10 36 08/31/2003 - 09/06/2003 1.04 1.11 37 09/07/2003 - 09/13/2003 1.04 1.11 38 09/14/2003 - 09/20/2003 1.05 1.12 39 09/21/2003 - 09/27/2003 1.04 1.11 40 09/28/2003 - 10/04/2003 1.04 1.11 41 10/05/2003 - 10/11/2003 1.03 1.10 42 10112/2003 - 10/18/2003 1.02 1.09 43 10/19/2003 - 10/25/2003 1.03 1.10 44 10!262003 - 11/01/2003 1.03 1.10 45 11/02/2003 - 11/08/2003 1.04 1.11 46 11/09/2003 - 11115/2003 1.04 1.11 47 11/1612003 - 11/22/2003 1.04 1.11 48 11/23/2003 - 11/29/2003 1.05 1:12 49 11/30/2003 - 12/06/2003 1.05 1.12 50 12/07/2003 - 12/13/2003 1.05 1.12 51 12114/2003 - 12/20/2003 1.05 1.12 52 12/21/2003 - 12/27/2003 1.05 1.12 53 12/28/2003 - 12/31/2003 1.05 1.12 MOCF = 094 ORIGINAL 1 IP?'A1?P? R PF11w17T1 t 13- t _-r l 1 JUN0 9 2005 ORIGINAL___ 20 " DETAILED REPORT General Info, atidciTV 04 CLEARw ; Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 819912004 Time Period PM PEAK HOUR Intersection FT. HARRISON/DREW Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FOOT Analysis Year EXISTING CONDITIONS 2004 Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group DefL TR LTR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 257 312 11 67 254 65 41 683 80 70 384 213 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.96 0.96 0.96 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 Arrival type, AT .3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Ob 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 10 0 20 0 50 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 4 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G p 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB On ly NS Perm 07 08 T G= 19.0 G= 24.0 G= G= G= 12.0 G= 55.0 G= G= iming Y= 0 Y=" 5 Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NS S8 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 295 372 417 48 864 73 570 Lane group capacity, c 357 651 553 351 1027 123 815 v/c ratio, X 0.83 0.57 0.75 0.14 0.84 0.59 0.70 file:HC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\roeraolizzi.GCC\Local%20SettinLys\Temo\s2k9B ... 8/19/2004 Detailed Report Page 2 of-') Total green ratio, g/C 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.56 0.56 0.46 0.46 Uniform delay, di 30.9 31.1 45.2 16.0 22.1 24.2 25.9 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.36 0.17 0.31 0.11 0.38 0.18 0.27 Incremental delay, d2 14.7 1.2 5.8 0.2 6.4 7.5 2.7 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 45.6 32.3 51.1 16.2 28.5 31.7 28.6 Lane group LOS D C D B C C C Approach delay 38.2 51.1 27.8 28.9 Approach LOS D D C C Intersection delay 34.4 Xc = 0.94 Intersection LOS C HC32000'-"" Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d ORIGINAL file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settinss\rr)erzolizzi. GC C\Local%20Settinas\Tem-o\s2'k9B ... 8/19/2004 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROJECT: LOCATION: DATE; LANE TYPE: NB SB EB WB PEAK HOUR / P.N.F. DATA HARRISON VILLAGE PROJECT NO: N. Ft. Harrison Ave (N-S) & Drew Street (E-W) August 17, 2004 SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A (SECONDS) 2 Lane NB 30 NB 2 Lane SB 30 SB 4 Lane EB 35 EB 4 Lane WB 35 WB 04-055 G Y ft 12 67 3 48 N/A 55 3 f? 18 42 3 N/A 24 3 90 JUN O 9 2005 111 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS ? `-i 1-4 i EVELOPMENT S VGS ' TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY D NG P ANNI ? ?jl/OFL`??ajEA PM L T ----- R --- L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES , .?>--- ° .. 4:00-4:15 8 ... 149 26 ---- 13 -- 0111, -- 43, ;. ----- 64 - - 64 ---- 0 --- 24 ---- 73 : ---- 18. ----- 557 ----- 4:15-4:30 4 164 .28• 18 8'" AT ''.: 70 86 2 19 60 15 - 553 4:30-4:45 20 `,166 32 16 91 41 41 61 4 1y . 62 . 11 558 4:45-5:00 8 181 17 1? (t1 r' 52, " 67 61 y 16 , 68 ' 18 . 566 2 234 5:00-5:15 is 16 .. .161 34 17 ¢ -' 60 86 . 79 3 17 (38 18 : 647 , 2,324 5:15-5.30 ; 11 167 .' y 18. it .; 63 78. `. 82 4 . . ,17. 66 8 . 611 2,382 5:30-5:45 7 183 34 1¢ 80 64 , AL 84 1 18 68 .• 10, 567 2,381 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:00 23 .113 28 13 05 48 56 41' 3 21 68 16 513 2,338 -- - ---- - -- -- - -- -- - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - ----- - - 656 886 99 1,252 189 130 720 383 493 528 20 143 492 123 4,572 1 1 TIME NS NB NB SIB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL 209 377 69 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME ~I I I + 1, 4:45-5:00 6 141 _ ,17 10 Op.: 61 57 61, 3 18 86 ; - 18. 566 498 ?- 262 64 *-379 5:00-5:15 16 101 14 ' 17 86 :66 68 78 3 17.- 69 19 647 306 -i ?-- 248 5:15-5:30 . -187 23 1 10 8 Y2 63 76 @2 A: 171, 68 8 611 669 -+ 11 -? r- 66 -+ 453 5:30-5:45 7 163 4 1 80 6{ 48 84 1 16 56 18 567 t 1 40 670 78 69 377 209 252 306 11 66 249 64 2,381 40 670 78 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:45-5:45 INTERSECTION PHF 0.92 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 2,391 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 788 PHF NS 0.86 PEAK HOUR VOLUME BB 655 PHF SB 0.96 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 569 PHF EB 0.87 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 379 PHF WB 0.90 ! 1 454 788 1 1 ?... 'I I I O T N • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Detailed Repo O uU ? JUN O 9 2005 ORIGINALPaC?geIof2 PLANNI ? DETAILED REPORT General Informs Site Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 811912004 Time Period PM PEAK HOUR Intersection FT. HARRISON / SEMINOLE ST. Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER Analysis Year EXISTING CONDITIONS 2004 Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WS NB S8 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group LTR LTR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 27 17 26 15 8 20 6 999 9 5 596 13 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I1 2.0 2.0 2.0 210 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 4 3 4 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G D 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Ti i G= 20.0 G= G= G= G= 70.0 G= G= G= m ng Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination ES WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 94 48 6 1061 5 655 Lane group capacity, c 317 320 553 1303 306 1301 0.30 0.15 0.01 0.81 0.02 0.50 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settin gs\rnerQoli zzi. GCC\Local%20Settings\Temn\s2k9C... 8/19/2004 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Detailed Report Page 2 or 2 v/c ratio, X Total green ratio, g/C 0.20 0.20 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Uniform delay, di 34.0 33.0 4.5 10.5 4.6 6.9 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.256 1.000 0.256 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.36 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.5 0.2 .0.0 4.1 0.0 0.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 34.5 33.2 4.5 6.8 4.6 2.1 Lane group LOS C C A A A A Approach delay 34.5 33.2 6.8 2.1 Approach LOS C C A A Intersection delay 7.2 Xc = 0.70 Intersection LOS A HC32000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d ORIGINAL file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settin gs\merQoN7,7.i.C'rC'C\Lncal%2OSettin gs\Temn\s2k9C... 8/19/2004 PEAK H OUR / P.H.F. DAT A PROJECT; HARRISON VILLAGE PROJECT NO: 04-055 LOCATION: N. Ft. Harrison Ave (N-S) & Seminole Street (E-W) DATE: August 18, 2004 LANE TYPE; SPEED LIMIT. SIGNAL TIMING: 9 G Y R 'p (SECONDS) _ Z NO 2 Lane NO 30 NO A 81 3 17 SB 2 Lane SO 30 SIB A 81 3 17 G7Z ES 2 Lane EB 25 EB FN/A 12 3 86 1-- WB 2 Lane WB 25 WB A 12 3 86 po ? c PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS < 4, cc r TIME NO NO NO SO SB SO EB EB ES WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY ??? O O PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES D? lr - - - - -- --- - - -- -- -- -- 4:00-4:15 2 18¢ 6 ,...0 116 0 4 . 3 8 0 4 4 -- 329 ----- 4:15-4:30 2 3$1 1 1 108 1 4 2 9 6 , 7 385 4 30-4:45 f 23a 1 . 133 3 .. 4 0 8 8 4' . ` 401 ( 7 4:45-5:00 1 $34" -0 3 143 2_ A 6 8 7 8' 2::' 418 1,633 ((( nnn 5:00-5:15 . i A10.1 2 , 1 143 3, 2 6 Q 1; 10.. 428 1,632 5:15-5:30 2 264 - 15 1 1160 4 6 4 2 451 1,698 5:30-5:45 p40 . 2' "Q 14;. 4 2 4 6 4' 2 4 410 1,707 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 5:45-6:00 1 208 ` 2 1 127 ? 2 2' 3 Z 4 2 354 1,643 - -- ---- -- ---- --- -- - 602 1,025 15 1,847 19 8 1,067 19 40 29 51 28 16 37 3,176 1 1 PEAK HOUR TIME NO NO NO SO SO SO EB ES EB WS WS WB TOTAL 13 684 5 PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME 4:45-5:00. 1 234 0; :log p. 9 ¢ 8 7, 3 3, 418 27 ?- 26 20 4--43 5:00-5:15 i . 3 . :, 261; . ? 2 1 143 2: 6' , 0 1. 10. 428 17 -? t- 8 5:15-5:30 ' 254 6 ( .140 4 9 . ` 6 6 4 2 4 451 66 -+ 25 -? i- 16 - + 31 5:30-5:45 ' 0 240 0 142 2 4 4 6 4 2 4 410 r 6 979 9 5 584 13 26 17 25 15 8 20 1,707 6 979 9 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 4:45-5:45 INTERSECTION PHF INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1,707 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NO 994 PHF NO PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 602 PHF SO PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 68 PHF ES PEAK HOUR VOLUME WS 43 PHF WB 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.74 0.90 ! 1 624 994 l f =r ? Ica.-.. , ' I CD V I f? 'r Two-Way Stop Control U l UN Q 9 Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAL TW MMARY General Information Site In nalyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period formation RP GCC 812012004 PM PEAK HOUR Intersection Jurisdiction nalysis Year ST HARRISON / JONES FDOTICLE4RWATER EXISTING CONDITIONS 2004 i Project Description East/West Street: JONES STREET North/South Street: FT. HARRISON AVENUE • Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes a nd Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 5 1000 0 2 640 9 • Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Row Rate, HFR 5 1111 0 Z 711 10 i Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 - - 2 - - Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound i Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 2 0 2 7 1 25 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 2 7 1 27 . Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 ' Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (vph) 5 2 4 35 C(m)(vph) 881 629 227 349 • lc 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.10 5% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.05 0.33 Control Delay 9.1 10.7 21.1 16.5 LOS A 8 C C • pproach Delay - - 21.1 16.5 Vpproach LOS - - C C + 0 0 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settin2s\roer2olizzi.GCC\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2kCC... 8/20/2004 PEAK HOUR I P.H.F. DATA PROJECT; HARRISON VILLAGE PROJECT NO. 04-055 LOCATION; N. Ft. Harrison Ave (N-S) & Jones Street (E-W) DATE; August 19, 2004 LANE TYPE; SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A G Y R (SECONDS) blot Applicable NS 3 Lane NB 30 NB SB 3 Lane SB 30 SB EB 2 Lane EB 25 EB WB 2 Lane WB 25 WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB ES EB EB WB WB WB PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 4:00-4:15 2 -, - O - -' A - 0 1 - -2 0 1 0 0. -' - 4.15-4:30 . Q 0 1 3 0 2.. x 4.30-4:45 Q b 0, 1 0... 0{ 0 0 2. 0 0. 0' 4:45-5:00 Q' 0 1 1 0 2` 0.'` . 1 .. 1 0 1 5:00-5:15 1f 0 A 0 Q .::. : 4' g 1 0 0 5:15-5:30 0 .., :.1 0 0 0 5:30-5:46 1 0.., '• 2 1. 1- 4 0 0 Q. 5:45-6:00 3 .. 0 0 .. _ .0 0: 4, . 3. 0: 6 .. 0 0 1 7 0 2 5 0 13 11 2 33 4 0 6 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB ES EB WS WB WB PM L T R L T R L T R L T R 5:00-5:15 1 0 0 0 0 ' 1 2 0 6 1 0 0. 5:15-5:30 0:, 0. 8 1 : 0 U 5:30-5:45 1 ..:' .0 Q' 1 0 0 1 5:45-6:00 3 0 0, 0.' 4.:.. 3 0 6 0 0. 1 .`. 5 0 0 2 0 9 7 1 25 2 0 2 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 5:00-6:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.78 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 53 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 5 PHF NB 0.42 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 11 PHF SB 0.69 PEAK HOUR VOLUME ES 33 PHF ES 0.92 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WS 4 PHF WB 1.00 TOTAL HOURLY VOLUME VOLUMES 0 3 10 30 11 33 13 37 12 46 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 17 63 -- 11 9 83 1 t TOTAL 9 0 2 VOLUME 11 14 r- 7 2 ?- 4 13 1 -? t-- 0 12 33 -+ 25 -? ?- 2 - ? 3 17 _ I 53 6 0 0 t 27 5 O V J 1 PEAK HOUR / P.H.F. DATA , PROJECT: HARRISON VILLAGE PROJECT NO: 04-055 LOCATION: OSCEOLA AVENUE & GEORGIA STREET DATE: August 19, 2004 LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: SIGNAL TIMING: A_ G Y R (SECONDS) Not Applicable NO NA NO NA NO SB NA SO NA SO EB 2 Lane EB 25 EB WB 2 Lane WB 25 WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NO NO NO PM L T R 4:00-4:15 .. 0 0;. Q 4:15-4:30 Q...;: O i Q. . 4:30-4:45 0 0 0 4:45-5:00 Q'; ;•, 0 0 5:00 5:15 0 0 0 5:15-5:30 p ' : 0 (! 5:30-5:45 p D 7. 0 5:45-6:00 0 0, „ 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR TIME NO NO NO PM L T R 4:30-4:45 .0 > 0 0 4:45-5:00 Q Q 0 .: 5:00-5:15 0 0 '. p : • . 5:15-5:30 p 0 0 0 0 0 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLL PEAK HOUR VOLUME NO PEAK HOUR VOLUME SO PEAK HOUR VOLUME ES PEAK HOUR VOLUME WS SB SO SO EB EB ES WB WB WB L T R L. T R L T R 0 ..0 0. 8 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4.. 6 0." •, 0. Qi 4 p 4 0.. 8= 4 0 ,o. 0 3. 0. 0 G .. 8 4 0 0 0, 7.. .0 Q 0 10, 4 0 0 0 2 0 Q 0- 14, -: 10.- 0 0 0.. 2 0 0.... 0 T.,; 3 0 0 Q'. 2 Q 0 0 8 4 p. 0. 0 3 0 0 0 70 41 0 0 0 27 BB $B $B ES EB ED WB WB WB L T R L T R L T R 0. 0. 0 8 .. 4 0 0 0 3 0: 0 .. ;.'D .. .8 6 0 0 0. 7 0 ..: 0 0r 15 4• 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 14 10 0 0 0 2 - ------- -------- ------- ------- 0 0 0 43 24 0 0 0 14 4:30-5:30 INTERSECTION PHF 0.78 ME 81 0 PHF NO #DIV/01 0 PHF SB #DIV/01 67 PHF ES 0.70 14 PHF WB 0.50 TOTAL HOURLY VOLUME VOLUMES 16 14 15 19 64 21 69 26 81 12 78 HOURLY FLOW DIAGRAM 15 74 - - - 0 87 138 l TOTAL 0 0 0 VOLUME I 15 0 -- 43 - 4 + t_ 14 ?-- 14 19 24 -+ ?- 0 21 67 -+ 0 -? 0 - + 24 _ 28 81 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 V J 155048 CL-200305 26. SYN ORI County: 15 GINAL station: 5048 Desciption: SR 595/USA 19/N FT HARRISON AVE, N OF CEDAR ST start Date: 05/26/2003 Start Time: 0000 • ----- -------- ---------- ---- Direction:- N --- -- - ------- -------- ----- Direction: ---------- -5 ----- - ------- Combined -------- Time ----- 1st -------- 2nd -------- 3rd ------- 4th ------ Total ------- 1st -------- 2nd ------- 3rd -------- 4th ------- Total Total --------------- 0000 27 33 31 28 119 I 15 20 11 16 62 1 181 0100 26 21 19 13 79 1 6 14 12 12 44 1 123 0200 19 20 9 22 70 I 8 13 6 9 36 1 106 0300 10 7 9 9 35 I 10 7 10 6 33 1 68 0400 8 8 8 9 33 1 4 9 20 16 49 1 82 0500 6 12 15 22 55 1 15 29 41 58 143 1 198 0600 36 44 64 78 222 I 95 124 132 187 538 1 760 0700 104 121 137 109 471 1 163 , 242 252 214 871 1 1342 0800 126 109 121 118 474 1 196 186 190 196 768 1 1242 0900 104 117 140 138 499 I 147 174 177 184 682 1 1181 1000 138 147 132 165 582 1 134 160 162 137 593 1 1175 1100 132 130 132 140 534 1 157 148 156 168 629 1 1163 1200 172 143 154 158 627 1 152 147 158 171 628 1 1255 1300 134 148 150 198 630 1 165 150 135 147 597 1 1227 1400 179 185 195 166 725 1 161 171 157 158 647 4 1372 1500 194 189 254 210 847 ( 129 162 156 126 573 1 1420 1600 231 228 270 224 953__ 1 134 142 136 178 590 1 1543 1700 303 290 242 194 1029 1 151 166 174 154 645 1 1674 1800 191 149 161 138 639 1 128 163 130 101 522 1 1161 1900 138 126 140 96 500 1 109 104 92 99 404 1 904 2000 112 110 123 119 464 1 83 88 75 75 321 1 785 2100 116 115 103 85 419 1 76 72 70 63 281 1 700 2200 96 77 65 68 306 1 72 57 47. 45 2211 527 . 2300 ------ 73 ------- 77 -------- 49 ------- 59 ------ 258 ------- 1 38 --------- 39 ------- 32 -------- 24 ------ 1331 391 --------------- 24-Hour Total ------------- s: --- ----- ------- ------ -10570- --------- ------- -------- ------ -10010- 20580 -------- P eak vol ume Information Di rection: N Di rection: S Combined Directions Hour vo lume Hour vol ume Hour volume A.M. 1145 609 0715 904 0715 1397 P.M. 1630 1087 1645 669 1645 1728 • Daily 1630 1087 0715 904 1645 1728 Truck Percent age 3. 00 3.00 .00 - n ------ ------- -------- ------- ------ ------- --------- ------- -------- tJ' - County : ti St 15 5048 JUN O 9 2Qa5 a o n: Desciption: SR 595/U SA 19/N FT HA RRISON AVE, N OF CEDAR ST start S Date: Ti 05/27/20 0000 03 PLANNIN g VE PMEN EL 7SV?$ - tart me: cf rv • ------ ------- ---- - ----- _------ -----_--- 7 ---- 7 Dire N ction: Di rection: S Combined Time 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total Total 0 ------ 0000 ------- 41 -------- 26 -------- 29 ----- 23 ------- 119 --------- i 26 ------- 20 -------- 20 ------ 22 ------- 881 -------- 207 0100 12 23 15 27 77 I 7 10 9 9 351 112 0200 19 18 11 9 57 1 12 6 6 11 351 92 0300 14 6 7 7 36 7 1 3 9 21 7 65 0400 12 4 1 9 42 12 6 20 19 5 1 99 0500 11 11 20 21 63 I 12 37 52 45 1461 209 0600 33 44 68 80 225 I 82 133 161 152 5281 753 0700 88 123 131 129 471 I 200 244 235 244 9231 1394 0800 119 117 130 114 480 1 169 219 195 184 7671 1247 0900 104 125 116 119 464 I 175 153 175 177 6801 1144 1000 0 124 143 149 546 149 166 171 16 654 0 1100 14 5 149 155 160 609 1 154 141 160 152 6071 12 16 • 1200 147 150 154 147 598 1 136 161 169 179 6451 1243 1300 152 163 164 162 641 1 177 169 152 159 6571 1298 Page 1 r . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155048CL-20030526.SYN 1400 157 159 196 185 .697 142 152 173 164 631 1 1328 1500 189 246 250 212 897 1 148 169 143 145 605 1 1502 1600 206 236 271 258 971 133 136 146 140 555 1 1526 1700 288 276 224 202 990 I 161 201 151 155,' 6681 1658 1800 179 180 163 162 684 137 147 126 129' 5391 1223 1900 143 137 113 121 514 1 101 105 98 78 3821 896 2000 105 134 135 125 499 82 88 78 75 3231 822 2100 117 101 93 88 399 I 109 71 78 59 3171 716 2200 108 89 94 75 366 1 59 67 58 51 2351 601 2300 - 85 74 58 42 259 62 42 28 23 1551 414 -- ----- 24-Hour ---- --- ------- Totals: ------ ------- ------ ---------- 10704 --------- ----- ------ -------- --------- 10261 2 ----- 0965 - ------- ------ ------- ------ P ----------- eak volume ------------- Information ------ -------- --------- ----- Direction: N Direction: 5 c ombined Direction s Hour volume Hour volume Hour volume A.M. 1130 612 0700 923 0700 1394 P.M. 1630 1093 1230 694 1630 1741 Daily 1630 1093 0700 923 1630 1741 Truck Percentage 3.00 3.00 3.00 Page 2 ORIGINAL r r • Pagel of 5 ARTPLAN 2002 Conceptual Planning Analysis ORIGINAL Description/ File Information Y: \PINELLAS\Harrison Filename Village (04-055) Date Prepared 8/23/2004 \AP_FTHARX.xml Program JJARTPLAN IlVersion 15.1.1 1 Analyst RP Agency GCC District Arterial Name N. Ft. Harrison Ave. Begin Intersection DREW I ntersection MYRTLE Study Period K100 Peak Direction Northbound U ser HARRISON (DREW - MYRTLE) r FT. Notes Facility Data Roadway Variables Traffic Variables Control Variables Multimodal Variables Area Type Urbanized AADT 20500 Paved Arrival Type 4 Shoulder/Bike No Lane Class 3 -? IK 0.09 Signals/Mile 1.00 Outside Lane Typicai Width Posted Speed 30 D 0.61 Cycle Length 120 Pavement Typical Condition # Thru Lanes 2 JPHF 0.925 Through g/C 0.6 Sidewalk Yes dway - Median Type 0/6 Turns Excl. Control Type Separaik/Roa Typical None Lanes 12 Semiactuated Separation Left Turn 2 Yes % Heavy Lanes Vehicles Sidewalk/Roadwa No Y Protective Barrier Base ate Sat Flow R 1900 I Stop bstacle to Bus No Local Adj. Factor 0.95 Bus Freq F7 Adjusted Sat Flow Rate 1681 Bus Span Of Service --J 15 11 .7a•iir•\il.,...,.?,o.,+?oi?n,..aoi?nco+ti.+.«\,.,a.,.,.1;?? f'-1- '\T Qi1zi)nna • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Page 2 of 5 ORIGINAL Automobile Segment Data Segment # Length F--IF-C Type Tu/rns Lanes Length AADT HVool ly FfS Median Type 1 (to SEMINOLE) 100 0.7 01 1 0.35985 20492 1125 35 Non-Restrictive 112 (to MYRTLE) 100 ?1 0?1 ?1 0.67992 20492 1125 35 Non-Restrictive Automobile LOS Mvm Segment # IF Flow Rat t v/c CDelayl Int. LAppr OSoach (mph) SeLOSnt L IF 1E 1 (to SEMINOLE) 1204 0.97 9.26 Al 24.3 B 2 (to MYRTLE) 11 1204 --Ai 29.4 B Arterial Length 1.0 Auto Speed 27.4 Auto LOS ?B Automobile Service Volume Tables -71 A -1 B C D E Lanes Hourly Volume In Peak Direction 1 670-1150 1190 *** *** -71 2 1390 2310 2380 *** F- *** 3 2120-, 3470 3570 *** *** 4 2870 4630 r 4750 *** *** * -? 670 1150 1190 *** *** Lanes Hourly Volume In Both Directions -71 2 1100 1890 1950 *** *** 4 -1 -71 2280 37,90 3900 -71 *** *** 6 3480 5690 5850-? -71 -71 *** ***? 8 4700 -, 7590 7790 *** *** * 1100 1890 1950 *** *** Lanes Annual Average Daily Traffic -71 ?- 2 11 12200 21000 21700 *** *** ?- 4 11 253002100 11 43300 *** *** 6 11 38700 63200 11 65000 ***-1 *** 8 11 52200 84400 1r-86600 *** *** * 12200 21000 21700 *** *** r1-r-r\r ..,ioi?na ,+ .? r.....?.....:. oi11»nnn .ORIGINAL APPENDIX B ORIGINAL High-Rise Residential Condominium/Townhouse (232) Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 4.18 3.91 - 4.93 2.08 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 4 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 543. Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting 7,000 y C W a F- m U . L m m c? d Q l- 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 3.77(X) + 223.66 R2 =1.00 Trip.Generation, 7th Edition 400 Institute of Transportation Engineers • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 ORIGINAL High-Rise Residential Condom inium/Townhouse (232) Vehicle Asuoso Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, JUN 0 9 2005 One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. )MEKI r of Studies: 4 r .*x• 4b !Melling Units: 543 Directional Distribution: 19% entering, 81% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.34 0.31 - 0.48 0.59 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size 500 y CC Lu a t` m U L m m fT ?II m Q F- 400 300 200 100 0 100 200 300 400 X Actual Data Paints 500 600 700 800 900 X = Number of Dwelling Units Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.29(X) + 28.86 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.98 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 401 Institute of Transportation Engineers • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ORIGINAL High-Rise Residential CondominiumTownhouse (232) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units T_ M On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, I JUN O 9 2005 One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Wudies: 5 Iln Units: 444 al Distribution: 62% entering, 38% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.38 0.34 - 0.49 0.62 Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size 600 500 ...... --- . . .. .....--... ;- -- C 400 -.. ----,--.. ..- . . -- W c 300 - --- --. .......... -- - Q 200 X 100-....:... - ........ ....:.....:.. i 0 i i T_ T* T? i T 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 X = Number of Dwelling Units X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 0.34(X) + 15.47 R2.=,0.99 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 402 Institute of Transportation Engineers i • • • • • • • • • • (814) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday j Specialty Retail Center ORIGINAL Number of Studies: 4 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 25 PL Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 44.32 21.30 - 64.21 15.52 uata Plot and Equation y W a H m U s m N 0 c0 m Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size ? .... ....... .. ......... ........ ......... ...... .............. x .....- .................... ------.---- ' --- ------- ------ --------- ... i - f -- - - - - -------- -------------------- ---- ----- ------- ............. 1 --- 1 ..... ...... ---- -- ...... ..--- --- --- ... .... ... . .... .... ..... --- --------- -----...-- •-------------- ----------- ....... ... ................. i ------........•........... ..... -- ---- ------ ---- ------ ----- x ? ---- --- ---- - ------ ------ - - ----- . ...... ................. ----- -- - -------. .... . . . -- . ..... . .. .. . ....... ......... ....:...... ....x.... -------:------ . l -- ------ ------ ---- .- ... J 10 2,100 2,000 1,900 1;800 1,700 1,600 1.500 1,400 1,300 1,200 1,100 1,000 900 800 700 600 500 400 20 X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve Equation: T = 42.78(X) + 37.66 40 50 ----'- Average Rate R2 = 0.69 Trip Generation, 7th Edition 30 X = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area Fitted Curve 1338 Institute of Transportation Engineers • • D M • JUN 09 2005 Specialty Retail Center ORIGINAL • (814) 7?SV?S • PlAN !N DE-VELOPMEN •°? . e t le Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area On a: Weekday, • Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, • One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. • • Number of Studies: 5 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GLA: 69 • Directional Distribution: 44% entering, 56% exiting • • Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area • • Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 2.71 2.03 - 5.16 1.83 • • Data Plot and Equation Caution - Use Carefully - Small Sample Size • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 300 ------ Average Rate R2 = 0.98 • • Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1339 Institute of Transportation Engineers 0 Detailed Report Pagel of 2 JUN 09 2005 ORIGINAL " E ED REPORT General Information CITk mtr4 b 16* Information Analyst RP rsection FT. HARRISON % DREW Agency or Co. GCC Area Type All other areas Date Performed 4114105 Jurisdiction FDOT Time Period PM PEAK HOUR Analysis Year FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group DetL TR LTR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 257 312 11 67 254 95 41 712 80 93 407 213 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.96 0.96 0.96 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 10 0 20 0 50 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 120 Parking / Grade / Parking N 4 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G D 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NB On ly NS Perm 07 08 G= 19.0 G= 24.0 G= G= G= 12.0 G= 55.0 G= G= Timing Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 295 372 450 48 898 97 594 Lane group capacity, c 346 651 555 334 1028 99 817 v/c ratio, X 0.85 0.57 0.81 0.14 0.87 0.98 0.73 ?lo•//!' •\Tln???t+?nn+oa/ 7(l?rriD/_7(1Ca+tinrte\rna-rr?7i ?•ri (:f- f-W n? X10/ 7(1Ca+fin?rc\Tvmr\c71rZ7 d/1 d/7()()5 • • • • Detailed Report ORNEgIal TIM L Total green ratio, g/C 0.36 0.36 0.20 0.56 0.56 0.46 0.46 Uniform delay, di 31.1 31.1 45.8 16.6 22.8 32.0 26.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.39 0.17 0.35 0.11 0.40 0.48 0.29 Incremental delay, d2 18.2 1.2 8.9 0.2 8.5 83.7 3.3 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 49.3 32.3 54.7 16.8 31.3 115.6 29.7 Lane group LOS D C D 8 C F C Approach delay 39.8 54.7 30.6 41.8 Approach LOS D D C D Intersection delay 39.5 Xc = 0.98 Intersection LOS D HC32000"M Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version X3.1 e ?7 .• //T,.1Tl . ..... ,..??a/_ ?n ...aoi ?nco++:., ?,\...o. ? .1; , /"_f" O\ T ..--10i ?nco*+;,,..o\Tv..,..\o71r2 7 A/1 AMnn; • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • O 005 ? [E Detailed Report JUN 092005 Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAL 1LED REPORT General Information 0-Iry ATER ite Information Analyst RP Agency or Co. GCC Date Performed 4114105 Time Period PM PEAK HOUR Intersection FT. HARRISON/SEMINOLE ST. Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction FDOT/CLEARWATER FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH Analysis Year PROJECT Project ID Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB S8 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group LTR LTR L TR L TR Volume, V (vph) 57 17 26 15 8 1.20 6 999 9 5 636 13 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.93 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, a 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 4 3 4 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, N. 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G P 3.2 3.2 3.2 t 3.2 t Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 G= 20.0 G= G= G= G= 70.0 G= G= G= Timing Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacify, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WS NB S8 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 135 48 6 1061 5 698 Lane group capacity, c 292 316 529 1303 306 1301 0.46 0.15 0.01 0.81 0.02 0.54 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Detailed Report Page 2 of 2 v/c ratio, X Total green ratio, g/C 0.20 0.20 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Uniform delay, di 35.3 33.0 4.5 10.5 4.6 7.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.256 1.000 0.256 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.36 0.11 0.14 Incremental delay, d2 1.2 0.2 0.0 4.1 0.0 0.4 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 36.4 33.2 4.5 6.8 4.6 2.3 Lane group LOS D C A A A A Approach delay 36.4 33.2 6.8 2.3 Approach LOS D C A A Intersection delay 7.9 X = 0.74 Intersection LOS A HCS2000TM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e ORIGINAL a t JUN 0 9 2005 PLAN ING OEVEL PMENTSVCS OF CLEARVI?ATEA ?t ..iir.?r?. .... .... oi?n... ioi?ne ,++,, .??........t:...: r-_f-r?\r nil AMOA4 i • • Two-Way Stop Control Ty JUN09 2005 . an M ILE 'Page 1 of 2 ORIGINAL ti. • L SUMMARY • General Information Site Information • • • Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed naiysis Time Period RP GCC 4114105 PM PEAK HOUR Intersection Jurisdiction naiysis Year S HARRISON / JONES FDOTICLE4RWATER FUTURE CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT Project Description East/West Street: JONES STREET North/South Street: FT. HARRISON AVENUE • Intersection Orientation: North-South Stud Period hrs : 0.25 • Vehicle Volumes a nd Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound . Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R • Volume 64 1000. 0 2 640 s Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 • Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 71 1111 0 2 711 10 • Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 - - 2 - - • Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 • Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR_ L TR • Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound • Movement 7 8 9 10 11 '12 L T R L T R • Volume 2 0 2 7 1 71 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 • Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 2 7 1 78 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ' Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 • RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service • Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 • Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (vph) 71 2 4 86 . C (m) (vph) 881 629 189 380 • lc 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.23 5% queue length 0.26 0.01 0.06 0.86 Control Delay 9.4 10.7 24.5 17.2 • LOS A B C C • Approach Delay - - 24.5 17.2 • Approach LOS - - C C • • ri .i?n.?r_ ._?__? ni?n _ani?na ++-,? ?_r_ i:..: rr r?T ?oi?nc r+.. ?r......1„71.2^ A/1AMnnc • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ARTPLAN 2002 Conce Description/File Information Page 1 of 5 ing Analysis ORIGINAL Filename Y:\PINELLAS\HARRIS-1 Date Prepared 71\AP FrH-2.XML 4/14/2005 Program ARTPLAN Version 5.1.1 Analyst RP Agency - GCC District Arterial Name 1 l Fr. HARRISON AVENUE 1 Begin Intersection DREW nd FE t rsection MYRTLE Study Period K100 Peak Direction Northbound User Notes FT. HARRISON (DREW - MYRTLE) Facility Data Roadway Variables Traffic Variables i Control Variables Variables Var ables Area Type Urbanized AADT 22719 Paved Arrival Type 4 Shoulder/Bike No Lane Class 3 K 0.09 Signals/Mile 1.00 Outside Lane Width Typical Posted Speed 35 D 0.61 Cycle Length 120 1pavement Condition Typical #1 Thru Lanes ;71 PHF -l 0.925 Through g/C 0.6 Sidewalk Yes Median Type None % Turns Excl. 12 Control Type Semiactuated Sidewalk/Roadway Typical Lanes Separation Left Turn a/o Heavy Lanes Yes Vehicles Base ate Sat Flow 1900 R Sidewalk/Roadway Protective Barrier No Obstacle p to Bus IF No Local Adj. 0.95 Factor Bus Freq -7 Adjusted Sat Flow Rate 1681 Bus Span Of Service 15 A/1 AMAAc 6 r • • • • • • • • . • . i • • • • • • • • • . . • . • • • • • • • • • • Page 2 of 5 Automobile Segment Data 7 Segment # F-Cy-cje? Length A/C Type FT%7 F#70" Turns Lanes Length AADT HVool ly FF;5 Median Type 1 (to SEMINOLE) 100 0.7 ? ?1 ?1 0.35985 22714 1247 35 Nan-Restrictive 2 (to MYRTLE) 100 ?1 ??1 ?1 0.67992 22714 1247 35 Restrictive Automobile LOS Mvm Segment # Fllow Rat t v/c CDelayl Int. LAppr OSoach (mph) 11 SeLOOS nt L IF -11 1[ 11 (to SEMINOLE) 1335 1.08 41.76 _? 15.1 D Ail 2 (to MYRTLE) 1335 0.76 HI1 29.4 B Arterial Length 1.0 Auto Speed 22.1 Auto LOS Automobile Service Volume Tables -71 A B C D E Lanes Hourly Volume In Peak Direction 1--? 670 -? 1150 1190 *** *** -71 2 1390 2310 2380 *** *** r 3 2120 3470 71 3570 *** *** -71 4 2870 4630 4750 *** *** * 670 1150 - 1190 ***-? *** Lanes Hourly Volume In Both Directions -71 2 1100 1890 1950 *** *** 4 2280 3790 71 3900 *** *** 6 3480 5690 5850 *** *** ?8 -1 4700 7590 7790 *** *** *-1100 1890 1950 *** *** Lanes -? Annual Average Daily Traffic 2 12200 21000 --7 21700 *** *** 4 25300 42100 43300 r-*** *** 6 38700 63200 65000 *** *** 8 --1 52200 84400 86600 *** *** -71 -71 * 12200 21000 21700 *** *** ORIGINAL 0 JUN 0 9 2005 7]_* / ,-t^k T A /1 A 111nnc ISEANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS NORTH FT. HARRISON & OSCEOLA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 DEVIIDPER TRIAN ILE EV=FhHTI' COMPANT, LLC CLEARWATER. FIOWDA 99706 ('I 4b-0020 ARCNIT6CP. JOINT VZRTUVII GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIATES P.A an YAW s.ERT - . "EVER TIORIDA 644'9 (-) ?P40D BUG ARCHITECTS 2.11 s slurs e =ARIIATER F1 -A aSAe4 (969) ee.-nl6 CIVIL SNGWH6N EIIH ZAYAC 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. IA- RAeR M FLUM. 94 PSG eos (>z>) >ea-uesa LAND SUR9EY CONSULTANT POI.ABIB ASSOCIATES, INC. 2%6 RR A SRI. IT C'IL' RWA'TSR PLORIDA *SM (927) eea0922 PAlU@IG/TRAFF[C CONSULTANT GULF COAST CONSULTING. INC. laan ROT BOULEVARD SUITS am CLEAR RATOL FLUMA a (T2T) 624-1410 GABAGB CONSULTANT RGBOTTC PAHU NG 12912 N. 4WM mm [18ARRA.R. FLORIDA 96>MU (927) 69G-T2>9 $NV?01o34PPAL CONSULTANT DELTA-SIVEN 447 are AMUR K awls 204 sr. P9YEIISSUSO, FIOWDA 06701 I-) en-2447 1FATEEPROOMG CONSULTANT C.B. GOLDSMITH ARCHITECTS Ia049 U.S. RIORIIAT Is N CLEAR RAT01. FLORIDA SET& (T2r) 5ae-0164 STRUCTURAL MMnU ER JENIO NS k CHARLAND, INC. 2401 FNUI.IIJB M eUIIS 200 .ARAW`T T1ORU, SAM (R41) 462-1>IT PLInmDta ENGDDD;E MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC. 9411 mum" CENTER RLTO "ITS eve -4 FLORIDA (eI9) eee-ceoo 1lBCHANICAL BMW= MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SOLURMONS, INC. 6411 RRA-0. CZaTE3 RATE. SUITS RA9 TAMPA PLUM. 3mM 1419) ee6-caro ELECPffiCAL ENGMM CHENAYES A ASSOCIATES. INC. 9902 ASL'EIE BTRRRT TAMPA FIOIUDA 66904 (ala) sT4-.- INDEX OF DRAWINGS ;. 9 tat P 77J °? u a rm eAma - ae?:_ $ 11 F y a f RMflt9- 1SWNmN I B TT ? mo. ? ? PLPA• ?. ( 1. 1 r ? i '? hiN. D1W_ ltertaF /._ J4A IN1 i l +1 ?? 1 19 P - el I QIDY Ott''.-.7? ?- y NM1AM I P4R 61 _... 1 ,1 s7r i... LOCATION FLAP ACHE ars F a ¦ "y Q a m ?Z x QW J ?0 Q r c 1 .0 OCQ0" l? < a cn I Po l as?3 O ? g TIM ? 'a?SD"9i 06-IL ouw-InY Vzoosrx` a?u? , m4N&{6 'CG'uftsur ORIGINAL Harrison Village seen from the corner of Jones and Fort Harrison • JUN 0 9 2009 IN j 14 ;-A 'j. ?, 77.7'R 12 I ti P i I F , I \ Lwa , ?, ?_'? „1) t11 y t?_. R,1 IF' p?•`r, gyp. Yi 'N IA I I "' L.M_;;!f/ M.I s, C? ?; .:? I ? :"ty,t\4 ull C ',.,+?,h•k Rye,', ???• ,,.{.:, ?., t I, 1 Yv ;? • • .?? ?Q '?'' l ''.? r ?4 e ? ^'.? ''? - 1 ?. 1l?? I ,-? >, _ y:±.d?` ?t e?. ? ?k''•` :? + {,?u t ?... ?. .??i V a . ? nm { • ORI GIN Island "foew Towers from the Waterway 7, I-A r ? I-A 1-8 I-0 °i-----; UTILITIE3 °a"=aaa, r r r I------------------ aaaaa*a-aaaja -a - ' i -- ----------- ? ?'-"-." ay r t,aaaaa*aaa?aaaa r r i 0. .}.i azaa?az-a?aaa=? i r ?a-aaac?azaal:za ea r r r f: ?+ ----------- aaaa ;?-'7?aaaa? W ?a-_a-*aaaa?aaaa ? ;? =aaa--aaa aaa - ------------ aa_a __ aa__ i- --; --- '?. -- - -- -- - ------ ¢---- ? ----- aaaart.aaaa-aa=a.1 :aaa aad.a--tea as a r ------- - ------------ _ ------ - m ? Laaaaa?.aaaa?-aaa --- as y r r r I-0 UTILITIES a r I-A I_g r I? O T i VIA EL MASTER PLAN ® ^ 4 1 1 t •G ,z 4 Ica ZQ ? d a sy W Q su: 40?$ = d) Qm? 1a7?<g F-I ?k'.f c'?oow 06-IL Al z Q / I-A I-C w .. / I-A I-B I-C SPA L POOL / I-D CLUBHOUSE I-A I-B I-C / ou / I,A I•B 1-C / I-D I-D ° n 0 p A A A O H-D H-B z w o a U ° WE w (g m l i H-A 9 H-A t i H-E - ? H-B y I? a w e f "" Z m e ?# oF6 R 0 r a a M ht FLOOR MASTER PLAN M Dea WK DICK °BIX 3 p°a oea DeIX :x H-C -HC I-B I-C FD M A I-A MB I-C FD ..,.. i' ,. ,.??? .. oecK M. H-D H-D _•z ?•szzal xx F xxxxxi _xx? xxxxx?xxx- a . ?_ H-B H-B . xxx x,____y ? Ix__axz x n _-'---- H-E H-A p----- xx = gg H-A. H-A gg i ----__ ---- ?___-------- dxxx_x____ oecK aIX oec DeIX M. aeIX oeg K •• ? I..... - ___ , n. M bB I-C 1-D FD FF ft-'"e HE MA O oeIX DGGK 0lCK p!IX oEIX 3?7 T /\\/1 CQR OeCK WCK H-8 H-B yy 0 9nd PLOOR MASTER PLAN ?K«. H-D H-0 1 JUN o 9 zoos e. MAIN H-C H-C ?7 dy e I a d3D'?a OS-IL A3 DlCR 06a as Ra MCK 0lCK o H -C H -C na I-D If I-A 1-B 1 C M 1•B I-C W 85 wa otcR Desk oea uuc _<, ?__? oe K H-D H-0 s ------------ - ------ ------ -----_i-___ H•E H-A - - - -------- ---- ? s _ ------,`----? F------------ -- Deck cea ------?----? oea DECK ,. ? aEa oca xa y ----- ------ `.... - I-D I-D I-A t? H-A H-E OlCK ?? DECK Ola -.7 H•B H-B ? T /V d -LOOR "AMR PLAN ® H-D H-D nn ? j JUN 09 2005 i PLAN 1 C HA He a .a .s b 6 Z Q 9i x lu rn a Fm {?{ Q ? d ? U n Q 0 I• ? :r a) (f Q U 3 l? IK cs-i A4 cea cea MCC cea 0ea oece cec< FB IC I-D I-F I-A M I•B IC I-D ..,.? F' cea oeac cea cea -a-i ?-_a?-_. ? aa,aas=.: 0 cea - - - i .a an= ?=a,aa d... a as,a a _ ====ah=='=? k=aaaa?aa- ' - roor ee(w .avv.Iaaa.q s,..#.• a=aaayaa=any' w ka===ate=a= ----------- ---------- -- MCK I-D POOL Yt I-A I$ I-C?? O 6D FD 1-F oea oea oec< ?'? cea ova ocac `" cec< wa V 1?. ® 1 n ? ?T naaTFR PLAN i f UN Q g 2005 aLA ? MENx V t s 6 .n 3 .9 t ?y R ? a o @? lu to m Q H i U A Q O ? ? OCau? t7 Lai os-Ic A5 DECK DECK OPCK ?? DECK I-D I-F I-A I-B I-C I-A I-B I-C oncK •,••^, I-D H-B 0lcK oecK 06? DECK cecK I-G HA I-G H-F I? H-B DICK DECK 4 I-G OPCK DECK ?? DeCK 8 DECK y I-D I-D H'B 3Y IB IC I-A I-A 1B IC I-D I-D IT oecK cecK o!u DECO ?? oe<K oecK D!? ,To V ) 6th L ith FLOOR MASTER PLAN ® g D ? JUN O 9 2005 PIANNII MENI ' crrv a S F a 4 ¦ Z Q N a rc ?a QF<t Qp?? 19 l7 i s T. ?3yRe"3s 06-I L AS a- M, L00R MASTER PLAN ORIGINAL ,d ¦ Z? U o OCa u l? c I m? IL W to C7 O z W ? LL r Q S f rTi iii ? u 0 AI ORIGINAL loch -nth FLOOR MASTER PLAN ORIGINAL .a 6 ,a 2 q ?? UNJiSz 3 do?? 3: pCQ u "? l7 i e 60 gl z MIA race FwoR Imam rux W 4y 4 U? = W o ?5 o ? is r 05-iL A9 PNTN01l5E MASTER PLAN ORIGINAL 6 6 k .a zd i l?U0, quo Qo?? Q" t7 Q < s 06-11 ?0 r' . G RAG LrU !J' Q r • r/1 Ego ?RE ?? I BEDROOM 'FI-A' :3® V v 3 BOOM 14-. ss.u, in., a y e?s 2 BEDROOM rm 3 BEDROOM 9-A' «If I BEDROOM 'f-f I BEDROOM 1--W Em ?am-29: 22 BEDROOM 9-C ORIGINAL G i e" 25 I BEDROOM IWE' E:K `NCO 3 BEDROOM 'fFC' "r }a 0 3 BEDROOM 'N-D' rxe yr+-a E ZBE4 22 BEDROOM OVSTUDY 9-D' 2 BEDROOM IVSTUDY 'F6' "°' ADO 3 BEDROOM 1-E' 9a »., ! 4 BEDROOM 1W z d ?? m IL OFg f ly U ? <s 06-IL A12 m-. j mzz C7 C) ? ? DECK zgj:2 0 DMMG r-W x W-v UVING w-r x s-r 14 fill AM r-w 7--r:;; I BEDROOM 10 R x S-W I i UTILITY o BATAnor-11 1-v xxo o o? LIVING AREA 1.010 SQ. PT. DECK AREA 138 SQ. PT. TOTAL AREA IJ48 SQ. PT. CD Of 1111111111 CD oa MASTER BEDROOM c-W x ir-W ?oa? DECK B OOM r3 x DMMG Ti' x r-r UVING P1 W-r K)l U92 W F-1 9EB-P WALK-IN CLOSET MASTER BATH r-r x r-c x 11 %..RGR x T-Y LIVING AREA 1.311 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 138 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1,449 SQ. FT. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 CD LIVING AREA 1.101 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 91 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1.804 SQ. FT. THE 3 BEDROOM •H-C• SOIL VILLAGE & ISILANDVIEW CONDOM IMUMS N01M ". HARRUM 1 08CEOLA CLEARWAIM FLORIDA 33715 JAMy Documents\Current Joba\Mehaaa\05-I4 Harrison Village Rahd Iv DESIGN ASSOCIATES. P.A. ARCHITEC 11'"LANNERS 685 Min Sweet 5wW. 1201 34418 (72'8 133-'HOO (721) 733-566 THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000'152 JOB NO. 05-16 DATE 4/21/05 DRAWIN JDS/MAW SHEET 12.3 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CD cC O LIVING AREA 1.35 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 258 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1.993 SQ. FT. JUN 09 2005 TITLE - 3 BEDROOM 'H-D' GRAHAM DESIG114 JOB NO. 05-16 P.A. ASSOCIATES DATE PROMT, . ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 4/21/05 HARRISON VILLAGE & SOS Saw Man Stnwt DmtdA ?, DRAWIN JDs/MAW ISLANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS NORTH PT. HARRISON 4 OYC80LA CLBAR0ATE3t, PLORIDA 33165 346118 n" i "65 ¦ THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA COOOl52 SHEET 12.d ?f J:\My Documents\Current Jobs\Melisaa\05-I1. Harrison Village Rahd IV-2\CURRENT\DRC\UNIT PLANS ?l 777 CD I I ? I=] ? ff9 f" ® 0 Ono DINING LIVING r-r x W-o• W-V x W-P i r ff7FUTkl I 1 I MASTER o KITCHEN :::-CLOSET BEDROOM S-v,x T-Y I ?? C-T x C-0• I I I ASTER DoN UTILITY B x c ?• e-o• x r-o• u O ? ? ? ? LIVING AREA I.OL3 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 138 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1.201 SQ. FT. DECK ORIGINAL ?5 -C V i MASTER Pq KRCHEN ' ?? BATH BATH UTIU ® W-W x r-r •' .! r-o• x 17-0• v-r x r-r ® ® C-0• x IO ® DINING lr I ?J -W x IL-3' A"M Dc JL ? T_- BEDROOM BEDROOM r -0• x r-r 1r-v x W-1d LIVING ? s-0• x 41-0• MASTER a BEDROOM 6-Y x s-Y ? ^ DECK LIVING AREA 2.024 SO. PT. DECK AREA 281 SQ. PT. TOTAL AREA 2,305 SQ. PT. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i JUN 0 9 2005 DECK P! Nil N VC; cTr RwaTER __j rjo LIVING I4-4 z 12'-b' A? `n ED ?..// ? M-4x14'-L• {.?J 0 O KITCHEN W-a it r-o• INNING r-L• x W-W 1 arm BEDROOM W-3• x 17-0' DECK BEDROOM 17-2 x Q'-W ji:B UTILITY ran I AM ^I LIVING AREA 1,195 SQ. FT. DECK AREA L04 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2,399 SQ. FT. a-L• x UTILITY T-0• x V-7 TITLs GRAHAM JOB NO. 05-16 3 BEDROOM 'I-A• DESIGN P.A. ASSOCIATES DATE PROJECTI , APCHI I ECTS-PUAmNERs 4/21/05 ]HAI RISON VILLAGE & 585 lisp Stnmt Sow. 8201 ® DRAWIN JDS/MAW ISLANDIVIEW CONDOMINIUMS 34LIS THOMAS J. GRAHAM SHEET ? ?35?5 ¦ LICENSE NO. ? ?2 WATER. FLORIDA 881 NORTH PT. HARRISON 4 OSCEOLA CE AA 0000952 . J:\Mu Documents\Current Joba\Meliaaa\05-I6 Harrison Village Rahd IV-2\CURRENT\DRC\UNIT PLANS i i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a • • • CD CD LIVING AREA 1.038 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 95 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1.133 SQ. FT. TITLES 1 BEDROOM •I-B• PROJECT, HARRISON VILLAGE & ISLATDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS NORTH 11T. HAROWN 1 08C60LA CLEARMTER. FLOMA 33166 ocuments\Current D DESIGN ASSOCIATES. P.A. ARCHITEGT3-PLANNPRs sew . I'lam str..c 5uts: 8201 rr 18133-1100 nav I33-1w65 Fdo JUN 09 2005 JOB NO. 05-16 DATE 4/21/05 DRAW" JDS/MAW THOMAS J. GRAHAM SHEET LICENSE NO. 12.8 AA 0000152 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ' IV Ls T ORIGINAL JUNO92O05 &D sv 1 1 1 I KITCHEN 1 DECK Q-v x W-W LIVING/DINING ; 21-0' x M-r 1 1 1 1 1 1 miff BEDROOM a0 BATH Alfll ? LINEN O QQ BMASTER . 10'i' x K>•i' DECK MASTER BEDROOM IL'-r x 17-0' WALK-IN CLOSET D D D LIVING AREA 1.401. SQ. FT. DECK AREA 215 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA I.L21 SQ. FT. 2 BEDROOM 'I-C' GRAHAM DESIGN JOB NO. 05-I6 ASSOCIATES P A DATE PROJECT. . . . ARCHITECT3-PLANNM 4/21/05 HARRISON VILLAGE & JIM Stroa 5 ® D J05/MAW IS]LANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS 3448 ?33-So rrn THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. SHEET (2 ? NORTH 1`T. HARRISON OBCEOLA CLEARUTATER, rLORIDA 213 iii AA 0000152 - J:\My Documents\Current Jobs\Mepssa\U5-IL HarrISOn Village Kahd Iv-:,g \GUKK=N 1 \UKG\UNI I I-LANO • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CD CG CD LIVING AREA 1414 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 21L SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1.830 SQ. FT. JUN 09 2005 J:\My Documents\Current Job3\Mehsm\05-I6 Harm Village Rahd IV-2\CURRENT\DRC\UNIT PLANS CD CYC 0 LIVING AREA 2.210 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 9'13 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 3,183 SQ. FT. CD LIVING AREA 1.226 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 98 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1.324 SQ. FT. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CD O JUN 0 9 2005 LIVING AREA 2.111 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 308 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2.414 SQ. FT. TITLE 2 BEDROOM W/STUDY 91-0• HAi RISON VILLAGE & ISLANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS NORTH PT. HAPJMN 4 O8CCWLA CWARUTM PLORIDA 33W \Mg Documents\Current Jobs\Melissa\05-I4 Harrison Village Rahd I\ DESIGN ASSOCIATES. P.A. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 585 Min 8trrwt Suft 8201 Wnds 3401111 ? 133M6b THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000152 JOB NO. 05-16 DATE 4/2"1/05 DRAWIN JDS/MAW SHEET 12.13 LIVING AREA 2=5 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 3M SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2AM. SQ. FT. CD C) CD LIVING AREA 2JO-4 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 338 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2.442 SQ. FT. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • CD Of O LIVING AREA 2ALS 50. FT. DECK AREA 422 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 3.090 50. FT. 4 BEDROOM •I-J• PROJECT, HARRISON VILLAGE & ISLANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS NORTH TT. HARRISON I OSCEOLA CLEAR"TER. ft0WA SWU DESIGN ASSOCIATES. P.A. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS $85 M- 9trsst DDu da Pbnde 3408 1 D 133- U Fdo THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICEN5E NO. AA 0000152 JOB NO. 05-16 DATE 4/21/05 DRAWIN JD5/MAW SHEET 12.16 • • . • i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ORIGINAL LIVING AREA 1,556 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 283 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1.839 SQ. FT. mL& 2 BEDROOM •I-K• PROJEM HARRISON VILLAGE & IS]LANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS NORTH ". HARRUM 4 OSMLA CUUUMATM MOMA WIS Village Rahd GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIATES. P.A. ARCHRECIS-PLANNERS us mm 3trect SoW. 20 34649 M" 133-WO Fd mn 133-9555 PLANS JOB NO. Ob-II0 DATE 4/2'1/05 DRAWIN JDS/MAW THOMAS J. GRAHAM SHEET LICENSE NO. (2.1 AA 0000162 • • r • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • mlu ?? \---I °-/r UL r-o• x a-w QO LBATH O V-P x V-0 MASTER BATH I z4-0 ? CLOSET v T [CASTER BEDROOM r-1• z rr-T -il O® w-f x W- -01 VK2" MASTER BEDROOM Ir-r x Ir-o• ? DINING ? 111111111 F1 ORIGINAL ? DeLK [ 0O0 LIVING AREA 1.904 5Q. FT. DECK AREA 194 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2.098 5Q. FT. TITLE GRAHAM JOB NO. 05-14 2 BEDROOM •I-L• DESIGN P A ASSOCIATES DATE PROACTI . . . ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 4/21/05 HAPJUSON VILLAGE & Saw $201 , IN, DRAWIN JDs/MAW ISLANDIVIEW CONDOMINIUMS 34158 THOMAS J. GRAHAM SHEET crn 133-Al ¦ LICENSE 12 18 OSC80LA CLBARIdATE FLORIDA 33= NORTH ". HARR180N 1 R. AA COOO15 l52 . J:\Mg Documents\Current Joba\Mehaaa\05-I6 Harrison Village Rahd IV-2\CURRENT\DRC\UNIT PLANS T. ORIGINAL 1113 1 113 ® ? ®® 013 11 IB 11 110 013 HI 1313 13 ? - ® ® _ ? ®® -, --- 13 13 on lo go Moll 1@ 1 [3 13 13 13 im go im on M 1113 [ED Lin s ? o o Q? E ------- - --. ISLAND VIEW - EAST ELEVATION ?. .JUN 09 1005 b Z Q z? ? a m &I Wa=r z ON. ?u?I 3: -0 :1 Ma3i 2 O F Q W J W os-u AI ORIGINAL D o e 8 +?_ ® .. :_. ®... 09 6 Ea d a°"„- ® o- FM F13 FFM ® -- ® ® ®. ®® ¢ §6 .?. :.: .. „.. .: S EEO ED 2- .. . -------------- d 12 [m, a .,. ..:...".... .........:.:.,-. wtwrw wu k 4_.T _________ - ?x?Aeuw ISI._1ND VIEW - SOUTH ELEVATION D JUN o 9 2005 P C??Y 6 MENT 3VC$ OF CLEgpINgT A , z d O? 0a-0 I Z j 10 40? OC4u? l'1 a TM.,?w$o;4s M05-IL A14 w ORIGINAL a at=^? e 9 4n ASP _ 4 - 913 -------- i - - ---------- d __ 9 Q 999 +.m3r?ar---__ 000 ------------- 9 Bill 4 Trr- 3 8 mow:- 4--:Y:--------- •me. eso.um } ! a# - -- - --------- u.o... •r? ? .cw ISLAND VIEW - WEST ELEVATION T JUN O 9 2005 s 3 ? c m.. ®® ,. 1313 T4 e® „??• ®® ®® ... .:. ®® ,..: .., .. .: ,..,.. :.... ® ® ,,. t : ,,, ,yam DF?AA¢ y?q? 0 d OF q rio .T J) a F ,a .i ¦ z d ?g w?x Qp•-B Q?aU ? t7 < s "C', O A O W 0 O W p 3 9 05-IL 11 A15 °' ORIGINAL ISLAND VIEW - NORTH ELEVATION 6 G e a .4 `L. V Q ?? a g? J Qo?$ oc43? z w ,ts O C7 z p; M x .. 1211 06-IL !fig "? E-Gr T B.T T--l D JUN 0 9 2005 ORIGINAL PLANNING Q OEVELOP?;IENT SV CRY OF CtEAPWA? ? m[ 1ooP i I ? Lem wdar LRE[ . DC IselDelTI.RL 61A. LaeeY i y Y ]rQ R.LOOR..... ... lI. FLDOIt___ ... . 1 « REEID[NT14 iT TT,? ev Y ! i h RIpItlC 1 _ ,. [1 FLO011 FLOM 6? j9 Q ?; b AR CADE IEITAIL n - e I? I I I I 'A'- BUILDING SECTION 'B'- BUILDING SECTION euLC ve•-ro BCAL@ yr -rA• eAaafL Tae w a PARAPET." a •L ALwgr+ae+o Dak RAM1 WITU Plelaa aoaRns - O wov Lea 1® ? ? ® owAx•ErR•L wIM1 M ROQe • 1 1 >b Roow p PAeT RCaw IL PLAMEw eU?L TM1 wOp a gT?sT eAw T JONES ST. - BUILDING ELEVATION eul.e vls•-ro awurwrtr•L pie TT. ermatLlee'CM NT. A 6 P .L PIRIP[T WILL eAlaalL TM1a woo exalt ma woof PARAPET MLL SARML ME FKWP PARAPET Y L ew•oDtTe T PP AU?VMDCWS BARREL TILE VTtW P wow E C0.VTm •?? ALVINM RaOpRa .. ?? ePTM P1eRa AWPGe ALU RIOaRR NTI lAM= Y ' ? % MOM D[CO aaLmeM OW PAMW e•lalL m[ w00 O q AA a•L "L ?? n . 111 11 1 1 11 11 11 0 0 11 11 11 1 1 11 111 „ aa, . g 0 0 4 alel R e ReT R eCO RD a ME l a x e eT Y O elO OTD CP aTeT WnOOYa a¢! eTD a PwORT YEOOpa Pa. OTO &AIRAL?e•M1 D alYCCO laa mD encm IQPwONT RROaOe e e FT. HARRISON - BUILDING ELEVATION t eCALe: Ine•-ru i I ' eae•Oe6 ', tae wow WA. Laser Q sum Laser rover w - -0-4 ? Z 7-ii. W a a ; o?$ ocQu? S r_ ? i W /nco. C? V U? F W 05-IL A17 -- ORIGINAL TILE RO01 DECO COllE1! -F oft Mlew'.1 RAIL-! I" ItlcP RDQ feel ORfAr'RMLL ReR geexNluL IrQ.ILOOR....... .... OMYlMLL RIlItlR e g010EMILL b a gTAR O 'kom 'C' - BUILDING SECTION -1-- 40 LL eRecraTe °waL reRM7T "N \ ALUTnu+wrowe eownee ?el°!L T_^ [? WI1M Ibltlci DECO coLu"? reRe I...u. ?wr. R L&M e1MlNrLL- RAII. M 110011 wrerirLL- RAMER, 7M ROOM 'E'- BUILDING SECTION ? ? Root Le° Deco coL b r?r °,-, L c EMMOL ILL' D[CK IAL. ?' LLINPe V pNpK LL 1 M ?0 RDO l?6 ?M gelDeM h IMNti ® .. .. M0.ODR PMCAeT leR ]b 0.0GE NlIV.1cY OIeLL .erne s"e ROCR 1 b eTUCCo DEOL ge1 1@AYTP° ? ew euro IIIOT P cOR eTq?IRpNT ORIYI MTLL eR ___IIpeT RDOR ... Dele d•L TRE ? c 'D'- BUILDING SECTION GEORGIA - BUILDING ELEVATION eu? ve•- r-v SCALE Ins•-rr TAT. W TLLRI'OIr ur. ° °NeRL ILe LL eTe euRReL MR ROOP PARAITT MALL PAAAF ET IYLL . ......... .. OO1e°Ce LLu•RArT awoae coRAee C 0.vPle AUr. uv+wT ee:ows eeleetL 9 AR°DA LtiM IAelec A.K.M ORW'RMLL RAM1 _ ® m I M ® ?mq MAL IqT FLOO t ECOg wok P µu' A I µlD° ',: MRT etE CQC16D Rew ern eleveTlLW ioR -el LAL =1 W L? 6 STD s eraglROrrt eruCC p O ?cOgD sTYOCO i ° OSCEOLA - BUILDING ELEVATION BCALE: U16--1•?• ° R LM W .._. -- . _.__ 1 ulna. rrrl --?,-..M k ® EMU t- 9E ORIGINAL ISLAND VIEW - BUILDING SECTION • • v 1 • • 12' HANCOCK • LAMPPOST I • • • • A • I . • • • • • I • • • I: l T • • 12' x 12' CONCRETE • PAVERS. FIELD TILE COLOR TO BE SELECTED • • • • • • SIDEWALK P • • • • ISLANDVIEW CO • Juk4 elf ^il Fi. ?A nl? H/C RAMP I 12' CONCRETE - (TYPICAL) NDING 12' CONCRETE PAVER BANDING' (TYPICAL) TILE UTTER RECEPTACLE SOLLAR HANCOCK ? ? BOLLARD /- H/CIRAMP III TRANSFORMER -i 1 11 , O \ \I 12' CONCRETE - PAVER BANDING (TYPICAL) i i L uP? I-- i i i i i i i i i i r • • • 7.,,..j O 1 C4 QUALITY HILL LUMINAIRE AND 12' HANCOCK POST PRIN BY S G CITY eII TITLE' LAMPPOST & BOLLARD mom", r HARRISON VILLAGE & ISLANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS • N. PORT HARRISON / OSCEOLA CLEARWATER. PLORIDA 3316! V I lr (121) n" S HANCOCK BOLLARD GRAHAM DESIGN ASSOCIATES. P.A. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS U1 MAIM 5TIZEET D. "P e 34L98 f1Z1) 133-'N00 BY SPRING CITY JOB NO. 05-116 DATE 4/21/05 THOMAS J. GRAHAM DWG. NO. LICENSE NO. SPL-2 AA 0000152 JAM9 Documents\Current Joba\Meha3a\05-I6 Harrison Village Rahd IV-2\Supplemental Accessories 0 i ORIGINAL i MOLDED POMA CORPORATION ` BALL WEATHERGUARD ALUMINUM • PIERCCAPE ALUMINUM FENCING • [Dc)c)(-)(-)O(-) IF • • Q ?, -4' 1'-4' i • • 12' HIGH i WATER TABLE • MOLDED POMA CORPORATION • BCCALLLN WEATHERGUARD ALUMINUM O PIERCCAPE ALUMINUM FENCING _ • • • ;r • V 1'-4' 1'-4' I R44444 12' HIGH WATER TABLE MOLDED BALL 10E CA • • • • • \-12" HIGH WATER TABLE i TITW i STREETSCAPE 4AcEjw,VA.L PROJECTS " 0 HARRISON VILLA ?, • ISLANDVIEW CON5O- MINIUMS • N. PORT HARRISON 1 OSCEOLA CLEARWATCR. PLORIDA 33166 J:\My Documents\Current Joba\Medasa\05-I6 Harrison Village Rahd IV-2\: • DESSIGN ASSOCIATES. P.A. ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS 596 MAIN $2r STREEF9O (Dmgdk 218133-'MOO n71) T3s-S65 COPING • s V . I O I CEMENT PLASTER ON 8' CONCRETE BLOCK v I I w CEMENT PLASTER ON 8' CONCRETE BLOCK JOB NO. 05-16 DATE 4/21/05 TFIOTIAS J. GRAHAM DWG. NO. LICENSE NO. SPL-4 AA 0000152 rF<?s ORIGIN??? 'REE \1171 t ot.\: - Q9ED ? R:.?C r 4R tR Qta v, 0;0, i e' •b• x G`u.°?C 5C E '\V'1\?Lres- c •v ?• 1 eE\C- - ,? CAS .,O\Cfi°'.. R ."P V d L T 3lr 7? -cs-•.? . 7 I? I Cl _ ., ._ \ Q.\yCF cQ P TREE ? 5-•-7E'FEE I IIr SCORE • A TeRcD CCNCRE-E °?vEFs a= • I i lkPIQ _ Ww 17:1 SCORED PATTERED CO\CR_iE CAS' ,,,,\„FE'_ CR\..T_ °C57 °A?FS -REE o QI U'- I v o = Bf4 F•CK CC\CRE'E F SR-„^.. \ I? o 'TEFED CONCRETE ?uu ,I I ? I y? \ f ORIGIN.AL t a i 1 i i 1 I I \r27E i o•v"se5 i I SUUZD ? C-0RG 4 "S 1 ?F / . case?T? 5 : o rz_Z= EE _s a. a L' i c e !0 35 a? ===i i 4 L4-' FCS- J'A ter. ? ..:tea Crl??_ ' Ii I M E _._r -----` , ;of4 Mir p? i _. a Cy' .M'. 1 L ?? eGYceS ' o5\C? --•----rte J - oI0 _ : . AD Awl li I I I fi i I I N' u ?G { 1 u ,;III 5'. e cJ) n •. Ill it m lY. ,i u I C' nI ` W! a m l lid ,• i Ill" EE i ` 111 d ? E l: I T ,.. ,..E ISLAND VIEW, e EAST ELEVATION 9CAm r a 3a Juw os 200 U • ORIGINAL... JUN 09 2005 ISLAND VIEW - WEST ELEVATION SCALE: r . Sa ISLAN ! VIEW - SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE; I' • 30' HARRISON VILLAGE & ISLAND VIEW EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEDULE RIGINAI AWNINGS SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 6601 TANAGER BUILDING FIELD SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 2831 CLASSICAL GOLD BUILDING ACCENT SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 6649 TANGO HARRISON VILLAGE & ISLAND VIEW EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEDULE ORIGINAL METAL ROOFING SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 6941 NIFTY TURQUOISE CORNICES SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 2833 ROYCROFT VELLUM TRIM SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 7104 COTTON WHITE HARRISON VILLAGE & ISLAND VIEW EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEDULE ORIGINAL ROOF TILE SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 6622 HEARTY ORANGE BUILDING BASE SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 2817 ROCKWOOD AMBER BUILDING FIELD SHERMAN WILLIAMS SW 2865 CLASSICAL YELLOW Page, I of 3 q, Y 19 V, Q! n aw From: thomas [thomas@triangledevelopment.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 6:18 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: Harrison Village etc Meeting 12 April H?IIQ (Sina I made some talking point sound bite brief notes (whatever you want to call them) on the meeting this morning (they are not minutes) and thought I would send them to you... Welcome Home! All the hest Thomas Meeting with Clearwater Planning Dept. April 12th 2005 Gina Clayton City James Bond, Steve Varrell C of S Jim Graham GDA Ed Armstrong Johnson Pope et al. Ben Kugler, Thomas Coates, Mark Perkins Triangle (These are very rough notes on the talking points fior this meeting; they are not minutes,) There are two reasons why we asked for this meeting; first to present Triangle's New Master Plan (and give an explanation of why there is a new Master Plan) and secondly to ensure that our new plan will not adversely effect the future development plans of our neighbor, the Church of Scientology. Last year Triangle and the City staff spent a lot of time and effort coming up with a plan that was not just acceptable to all concerned but very much welcomed. It's only because of the sale of part of our property (to the Church) and the purchase of the contiguous waterfront property (the Rahddert property) that we're coming back to the Planning Dept. We attempted to retain what we had with modifications to the original Development Order but it just wasn't working. What we are going to present we believe retains the best of what we put together in the past with definite improvements for the City, Triangle and the future residents and businesses. Master Plan Note the following points of the new Master Plan (these are still changing): Prior Current 4/14/2005 Page 2 of 3 • • Total Number of Units in Island View 48 279 Total Number of Units in Harrison Village 145 47 Total Units 193 326 Total Area 3.83 ac 5.69 ac Total Parking 339 443 Total Parking on the street. 24 46 Height of Island View 150' 150' Height of Harrison Village 50' 35' Density Pool Request 46(24%) 92(28%) The same Florida Mediterranean Revival look at Harrison Village with clock towers. 20,000 sq ft of retail at Harrison Village that wraps around all corners. For Island View, extensive surveys have produced a twin tower structure that maximizes the use of the waterfront property and allows for more affordable housing at Harrison Village. Robotic Parking still used (and expanded) at Island View. Harrison Village residents and shop owners will use the robotic parking at Island View. Additional on-street parking due to the straightening and widening of Osceola. The privatizing, moving and straightening of Osceola has been met with approval by key city departments: Engineering, Solid Waste, Traffic, and Fire. Key elements will be retained. These are... The look, the original spirit of the place. More specifically, the Mediterranean Revival style, the urban feel, the community character. In harmony with Downtown Old Bay character district. The scale. On HV, the most visible portion, the last approved design was 50' plus; this is around 35'. High. New version has gone from 5 to 3 stories high. Island View is still 150', in two towers with a 50' structure for Robotic Parking on New Osceola (two floors above ground with three floors of units over, 50' high.) The portions of tower at 150' are still to the west of where Osceola was. Density Pool will have a similar draw from it. Bulk and Massing. Less mass on Fort Harrison. Although we felt we handled the apparent bulkiness or the previous version, this building is simply smaller and easier to handle. Stepbacks and setbacks as before. Mixed use character of the development. HV retail and residential. Retail on Fort Harrison. This has remained the same in area but the stores have been configured with greater depths generally. Arcades to traverse the long city block, as well as covered walkways along the retail fronts. Pedestrian-oriented streets, especially Osceola. Extensive Streetscape still taken all around block. Ground floor access units on Osceola side of HV. Street Parking. By moving Osceola and upgrading it from a 40' to 50' ROW we have doubled the number of on- street parking places. Parking all around block. On-site parking (Robotic Parking) still accessed from Osceola. No curb cuts on Fort Harrison. Osceola upgraded form substandard one-way 40'ROW, to two-way 50' ROW, remove two bends. Removed confusing access from south to addresses on Osceola. Increase range of price points, making HV (especially) more financially accessible. HV amenities will include rooftop pool, gazebo, barbecue. Courtyards have been relocated to IV where there is a water view. IV water views have been maximized. IV pool was too small. Increased allocation for amenities in larger building. Corrected amenities imbalance. (Not enough in IV as it was too small to justify what was really needed.) Fire, Engineering, Traffic, Solid Waste all have favorable initial reception. Steve Varrrel reviewed what the C of S plans to build and how being east or west of Osceola may not be an issue; at question are the church and institutional uses for the building. 4/14/2005 0 Page 3 of 3 Brief Notes Afterwards... Gina implied ancillary uses may be made for retail in condo block. Attention on the looks of the buildings, she wants to see the new elevations. Enamored of old ones. We need to pump up the design on the entrances to the Arcades. Wants to see final product. Maybe take Osceola name away to handle the problem of east and west. General high level of acceptance. Ed's point on non prohibited uses simply acknowledged without acquiescence. C of S issues appear to have more runway in front of them, and my impression was that solutions would be found. 4/14/2005 z E ENTIAL KING D, TWO ABOVE) STORY RESIDENTIAL ON STREET ESIDENTAIL OVER THIRD PROPOSAL WITHOUT MARION (RE-ALIGNED OSCEOLA TO WEST, HV STRIP) IV TWO TOWERS) ASSUME MARION PROPERTY IS OUT ALL DIENSIONS APPRm(IMATE AND POST RAHDERT ACQUISITION 0 0 - ; 1 _0 o0 0 r Y ~ ~ r IA ~s Li e{' ~,9' ~ 7Y".. a ,f„ N z 0 W e r W C Q v SHT. DATE 0~ ISSUE r 0 PL WITH THE FOLLOWING CODES: DESCi21i'TION THE BUILDIN( i. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE LATEST ADOPTED EDITION OF THE BUILDING HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO C M Y 0 PMENT COMPANY LLC " " ° ATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE" TRIANGLE DEVELO ~ T FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, THE N HE ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND fEDERAL CODES 2001 FLORID, 2001 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WITH 2003 REVISIONS CS COVER SHEET 714 N. FORT HARRISON AND AND ORDINANCES, AND ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING LOCAL JURISDICTION. 200q fLORIDA MECHANICAL CODE - - CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 200 FLORIL 2. ANY EXISTING CONDITIONS WHICH DIFFER SUBSTANTIALLY FROM THAT (727) 446-0020 INDICATED ON THE ATTACHED PLANS, SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NTINUING 2001 FLORID: ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT, BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH OR CO ITH 200 REVISIONS AI VILLA MASTER PLAN 2001 FLORIDA PLUMBING CODE W 3 ANY FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. NATIONAL EL 7 A2 IST FLOOR MASTER PLAN NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE 2002 (NFPA 0) . JouvT vENTURE 3. IN THE EVENT OF ANY DIFFERENCES OR CONFLICTS BETWEEN THESE T A3 2ND FLOOR MASTER PLAN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE AGREEMI=NT BETWEEN THE CONTRAC OR FLORIDA FIRI ~ LT A SIGN ASSOCIATES P. A. T OWNER. THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THAT AGREEMENT SHALL FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004. Aq 3RD FLOOR MASTER PLAN GRli[1t11Y1 DE AND HE GOVERN AND PREVAIL. NO EXGLU510NS FURTHER THESE DOCUMI=NTS ARE FLORIDA BUII E 200q CHAPTER ll, FLORIDA ACCE551BILITY I FLORIDA BUILDINGS COD 1 585 MAIN STREET SUITE 201 ro REVIEW CHANGES AND FINAL APPROVAL. suBJECT , IDA 34698 coDE FoR ~ CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AS qTH FLOOR MASTER PLAN DUNEDIN, FLOR _9400 4. THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN PREPARED FROM THE MOST (727} 733 L INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ARCHITECT. ALL THE DATA LIFE SAFETY AL STH FLOOR MASTER PLAN O~n LIFE SAFETY CODE 1997 EDITION (NfPA 1017 COMPLETE FIE D 1 ~M Al LTH - 9TH FLOOR MASTER PLAN ca' -i ~T ON EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS IS APPROXIMATE ANO SHALL BE BDG ARCHITECTS VERIFIED PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK. ANY CONDITIONS WHICH DIFFER FLORIDA ENE FLORIDA ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE FOR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 199'1 t9t+1 i SUBSTANTIALLY FROM THAT INDICATED ON THESE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2611 SEVILLE BLVD. SUITE B SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT, BEFORE PROCEEDING AB IOTH - 12TH FLOOR MASTER PLAN mc4 ~ rr ORIDA 33764 WITH OR CONTINUING ANY FURTHER CONSTRUCTION AS THE SiTUATfON WARRANT5. CLEARWATER, FL A9 1 TH FLOOR MASTER PLAN rX ~ 3 ~ 727 584-9516 SHALL COMPLY FULLY WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR . ~ ) 5. CONTRACTOR A10 PENTHOUSE LEVEL MASTER PLAN In CONSTRUCTION AS ESTABLISHED BY LOCAL JURISDICTION AND ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS. • ~ ao All ;UNIT FLOOR PLANS '1' ~ 117 ~ NTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE G. THE CO GENERAL CONDITION OF THE CONTRACT" A.f.A. DOCUMENT A201 AND SHALL A12 UNIT FLOOR PLANS ~ za C & ASSOCIATES INC. ITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. KEITH ZAYA ~ COMPLY W _ A13 : 15LAND VIEW -EAST ELEVATION z OCCUPANCY o 101 PHILIPPE PARKWAY SUITE 205 N LABOR) SHALL HAVE WRITTEN OCCUPANCY 'I. ALL WORK (EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, A D NLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE, _ Alq I LAND VIEW - 50UTH ELEVATION S SAFETY HARBOR, FLORIDA 34695 GUARANTEE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE tl) YEAR, U AN FELTS IN FROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION, AGAINST Y DE A ITIONAL J (727)- 793-9855 SAID WORK, WITH APPROPRIATE REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT AT NO DD A15 ISLAND YIEW -WEST ELEVATION _a~ C05T TO THE OWNER. AIL ISLAND VIEW -NORTH ELEVATION I Q T A 70R SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND JO$ CONDITIONS AND 8. CON R C SHALL REPORT TO THE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES OR OMI5510NS CONSTRUCtI CONSTRUCTION TYPE - AI'( ARRISON VILLAGE - EAST E SOUTH ELEVATIONS N H ~ WHICH WOULD INTERFERE WITH SATISFACTORY GOMPLETfON OF WORK. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF ALL FIELD MEASUREMENT. UNPROTECTED / UNSPRINKLED _ F" N A18 HARRISON VILLAGE WEST d NORTH ELEVATIONS r~ tt IS ASSOCIATES INC. INATION OF ALL POLAR ~ TION AND INSTALLATION CRITERIA. COORO FIELD CONSTRUC V v 7 TRADES AND OWNER SUPPLIED ITEMS. AND THE MEANS AND METHODS OF 2915 S.R. 590, SUITE 1 ` CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR fS RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING FOR ELEVATORS, A19' 15LAND VIEW -BUILDING SECTION CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 Ho15TING FACILITIES, PARKING, ETC.. FOR THE COMPLETION OF WORK. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HANDLING OF MATERIALS. ' v r. (727) 669-0522 9. CONTRACTOR TO OVERSEE CLI=ANING AND ENSURE THAT THE PREMISES ARE v MAINTAINED FREE OF RUBBISH DURING CONSTRUCTION. FINAL CLEANUP IS THE N RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. REPAIR, PATCH, TOUCH-UP AND MAINTAIN CLEANING UNTIL OCCUPIED BY OWNER. U ~c a NSULTING INC. TER INATION OF THE WORK, SUBMIT TO OWNER MAINTENANCE MANUALS GULF COAST CO ~ 10. AT THE M ~ b. SUITE 605 - PRESENTING FULL DETAILS FOR CARE AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL SURFACES 13825 ICOT BOULEVARD IP ENT OF EVERY NATURE. CONTENTS SHALL INCLUDE MANUFACTURER'S to AND EQU M AND INSTALLERS NAMES, ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33760 INSTALLATION, START-UP OPERATION. MAINTENANCE PARTS LIST AND DATA 5HEET5. /727 524-1818 - i - t } VED EQUALS" "EQUAL TO" OR OTHER QUALIFYING TERMS AND ARE II. WHEN APPRO USED. IT SHALL BE BASED UPON THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY ARCHITECT. - ©Copyright-Graham DesignAssociafes,P. ' All rights reserved. This material is the exclusive property FORM WITH DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. DRAWINGS ARE 12. ALL WORK 15 TO CON NOT TO BE SCALED FOR INFORMATION. of Graham Design Associates, P.A- Reproduction inwhole or in parts is ' PARKING ROBOTIC sUictly prohilided vrithout the prior written permission of Graham Design Associates, 12812 N. 80th STREET ~ P.A. and any such reproduction may subjedyou to civil andlorcriminal liabBity DA 33760 CLEARWATER, FLORI ~ under Tille 17 of the United Stales Cade. -7275 (727) 539 DELTA- SEVEN 447 3rd AVENUE N. SUITE 206 ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA 33701 -2443 (727} 823 L1 MITH ARCHITECTS C.B. GOLDS t- 13003 U. S. HIGHWAY 19 N. - r - ~ CI,EARWATER, FLORIDA 33764 ~f~~U ~ F7-a2oo - o~los 727 536-0456 i~~~ Q , _ Q t ) N0. OF BEDROOMS ri~~r O(c OZoS JU~d 09 2il oc FLOOR TOTAL TOTAL ~ Y ~ RETAIL SQ/FT ~ o LEVEL UNITS 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR UNITS Si~N S & CHARLAND INC. Q~T~ 2rv~ CiY ~F - '~1ENTSttC$ C t'~VtiA'" ~ JENKIN Z eP Z W ~ b F- 2801 FRUITVILLE RD. SUITE 200 VILLA 2 3 4 0 9 9 - d .SARASOTA, FLORIDA 34237 3 952-1717 941) 10 10 5 0 25 T 1S 25 18,893 SQ/FT ~ d W J 14 14 12 0 40 2ND 40 - ~ P4~ f~ I MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC. 3RD i 2 i s i 2 o s$ 38 - SITE LOCATION r:~ 5411 BEAUMONT CENTER BLVD. SUITE 675 i TAMPA, FLORIDA 33634 4TH 6 18 5 0 29 29 - (813) 885-9600 F 0 5TH 6 18 5 0 29 r r 29 MECHANICAL ENGINEER 20 _ 770 Eii Lff st w MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, INC. 6TH s to a o 20 ~ 5411 BEAUMONT CENTER BLVD. SUITE 675 7TH 6 10 4 0 20 20 - TAMPA, FLORIDA 33634 F Xw o ~ (813) 885-9600 8TH 6 10 4 0 20 20 r rye T H; ; l; C t, to 20 9 Lme IFIadoi, t F w ELECTRICAL ENGINEER sTH s 10 4 0 20 CHEHAYEB & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10TH a s z z 16 16 J, 9 ~ 7 , n 3702 AZEELE STREET E~~" 77 ~A lap, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33609 11TH 4 8 2 2 16 16 z (813) 876-1415 12TH 4 8 2 2 16 16 a ~f 77 77 77 7 N a i 13TH 4 10 2 0 16 16 aft S 1 a n17P :3 PENTHOUSE 0 4 4 2 10 10 fd L r~~.. Pl? hn -7M ,o ~ m Ito " a TOTALS 90 155 71 8 I=E 324 18,893 SQ FT t He H- ! "1 s I+ n ri r d'.< < 3 .1 .,...N.~ r~q'I"y} 3:At i - ~s 0 4i.611 L4-~4 L{-+9 7 - La THOMAS J. GRAHAM s P leI ~lE~ LICENSE NO. J~ AA 0000152 Rack ro, li NORTH DATE LOCATION MAP h e 0 SCALE: N.T.S. cigios 0 Q DRAWN 0 0 MAW Ln c s 0 0 CHECKED OD DS v i I I i - r U ~ m N z 0 N lll DECK DECK -A E ~ DN ELI ELECTRICAL ~ w ru r x x i d K H a I I I I W ~ ~ ~ ~ Q I I I I I p a a I I I I I ' -B i- I ' 0 I I I I I r X I I I I I 4-------I------~----- DECK I~ I I I I DECK DECK _ I' I I I I DECK - DECK I I I I I i I I I I ------I----- ~ ~ ~ - I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I -----I------~-----~ f-------f------F----- I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I p,~i, I I I I I I ~ n-M c~ I I I I I I I I I ~m ~ rr I I I i I I I crux I I I I I I I - m~ L~ 1 t ~t ~ N I ~ ~ a°°- I I I I I I I I I I I_-- I W ~f ~ W z a I I I I I I I I ~ I I I-----I o I. I i Q I I I I ~ I ~ ~ I~ a i, ( ~ I I - - - - - I 3 i--------1-------1------ I I r I I I I ~ I I c I I I V l ~ I I I ~ - I I I O I I I I I I E'- I ------I------ I I I I I I - I I I I I I v I I I I I I I I I ~ I ` ------------I------a E-------I-----~----- I I I I N I I u ~ I I I I I I W I ~ I I I I I ~ -----i- I I i I I I t I I I I I I 1 I I I I ©C~'p9rilg~h~5 ~admDesignAssoaates,P I I I I I This material is the exclusive property _ - - - - _ - _ - - - of Graham Design Associates, PA.. - - - - -I- - - - - J F - ~ ~ Reproduction in whole or in parts is DECK I I I I I strictly prohibited without the priorwdtteri I I I - - - - pennissionotGrahamDesignAssociates, DECK _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ ~ - - - - , PA. and any such reproduction may DECK DECK - subjectyou io civil arMlor criminal liablity j I I I under Title 17 of the United States Code. DECK DECK I I' I ------1----- I I I I TIE ILI I I I I I T -D o_ I I I I I - I- ~ I I I I I B -A ---+------I f-------I------+----- z I I I I I 4 K > > t.1) ELECTRCAL ~ ~ r d1 -A Q _0 0 UP DC t DECK DECK W b I-- ~ a ~ ac Jl1N 0 9 Q ---d w Q- ~ PIANNINC ~ pEVEIOPbf ~ CI~OF ENTSVCS CLEaRWAT~R b LLI I- ~ J -lb gg w 0 ORIGINAL N N z 0 z d ~ a L z w 0 NORTH L / LU u wd ~ VILLA MASTER SCALE I'= 20'-0" Q = H w f a LL u I > wd 0 z z A ro m 9 4 x 0 / u i a 0 THOMAS J. GRAHAM L ro LICEKSE K0. AA 0000152 z ro E V~V O Q 05 I ' DATE N 4 DRAWN O C4 W of a MAW V 0 0 L n CHECKED a Q V DS m V L ' V LOADING/UNLOADING i _ . - i - . - I m _ s - I I e - ~ - o SA I DA o ~ \ \ / ~ - \ / \ \ \ / \ l~ \ / \ ~ I \ / \ I ~ J / \ Q / \ 7 / el N / z DECK / 0 ~ N DECK OFFICE / I I 1 ~ D DECK + DECK DECK I / W FIRE I / 0 ~ COMMAND I N I 1 I I ~ I i i i i Q I-D I i ~ FIRE I I ' I _g PUMP I QQ I I e I I i i I-A I i i I CARTS I I I UP DN ni MAIL I - I ~ E E I ~ I ~p uP 1 I r I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I 1 ~ I I I I I I x r--- 1 I 1 a I I I W ~ ~ I ~ ELECTRICAL - - - - - I - - - - - e ~ I e Q 1 I -B - I ~I I I I Y ~ I W PA I II I I O 1 I z I II I I I ~~uu~~ I I 1 I - - - - - - - - - - I W II ~ ~ I DECK I ~ I II I DECK DECK Q DECK I II DECK J a. I II ~ I I II ~J~ I I • ------I------I W ll - I Q - I II I I II 1 II II Q e I I I I II I i ~ II I HIR 00 _ I I I I II I - - - - - - - - - - - - i i ~ ll , I I I I I u 1 TO BEACH DN•:•` I I II i I I1 I \ ~r-- I I I I ~ • HIR E I I I U O ~n 1 i V • • 00 PLANT R _ ------I-----~ ~ ------I----- ~ A I \ ~ , 6~" ~ L . I I I \ P41 t~ - 1 I I I I \ ~I ~ W c~c~ . ~ I \ ~ ~ ff I I r ~ , I I I I I ~ ~ NX 9 • i - I I ~ ~ I ------I------ ~------I----- /vl ~(1 ~it- I I l~ o V. • RAMP I I I I ~ e ~ =====d====~ ~ ~ I W I I ~ I I I , I z R . I I I i z o ~ a m •••..o~•:~:... Y ti ~ o • :•.•=o ~ ~ o_ ~ Ij I I I Z ~ ~ ~ ~ . =z• . ~ z > I = \ _ H I I I-------~----- ° ~ , -E ~ ~ - J a I I I I Y ~ Q- f i----- I ~ ' ~ o I p 1 ~ I I pe ~ ~ ~ - • . RAMP v - ~ I I I I ~ 0 ~ ~ cv ~ ------I--------I i-- -I - ~ I i I I U~ ~ ~ ..;DECK, ~ / • 1 I 1 ~ • I / ~ W ~ / I I / ~ I I , I ~ v • ~ _ ~4 PLANTER ` ------I------~ I--------I- ~ ~ J I I I i I ~ e ~ I I - • 00 I w ~ U - I L1 ~ - ~ 1 Q~ I II ~ ~ ~ ~ TO BEACH AN i II ~ ~ I I II 1 ~ W I ~ ~ i ------I------I ~ II I I II I i I I I t7 F--4 I UP ® ~ z I I I II ° - n I < - - - - - - - ~ I 1 I 0 ©Copyright-Graham Design Assodates, P 1 I I I I Elf~'• ~ All rights reserved. I I II I FOUNTAIN ~ b This material is the exclusive properly Q - ~ w I I I z of G2ham Design Pssociates, PA_ I I ~ ~ Re roduclion in whole or in parts is r DECK ~ ~ u I TR ~ P ~ I I I r p strictly prohibited withcut the prior written .A ~ ~ DECK ® ~ permission of Graham DesignAssociates, - - - - - - I I ~ I ® A. and an such re rotluction ma - I P Y P Y bO' 0' DECK DECK DECK I ~ I RIGHT- F-WAY I under~Tlle 7ofiheUrirtedStatesCotle I~ i II J DECK W II ~ i n r 3 I I II ~ I ~ ~ I u © I w e E H LUB E ~ Io ~ I- I >I - e 24.0. ~ - I- IB I I ~ - -A ELECTRICAL - - - - - - - - - - PAVE ENT x I I 1 a I ry v q ~ i i r I I Y ® I U I I 0 ~ji V. V. ` I ~ I l~ h-aa ~ I ~ i MAIL I ` I-»~,~ I1 t' CARTS I ~ ~ DN I ~ ~ LI ~n I- PUMP I I Q Q - I- I- I 1 . 1 I D I e J o ~ ~ I 0 Q., I 0 I I ~ ? DECK GARAGE FIRE 0 ~ SHOP COMMAND I \ DECK DECK DECK I \ ~y ~ \ ~ LL !li 1 \ ~ ~ DECK \ W i ..nn d 1~ _ DECK DECK \ . 1 I VO ~ - r H-B ~ ~ ~ t' I w ~ Q / I Q ~ m / I O ~ / U / gg pp ~ SA I DA /:CAIC~dTn12 ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ P Y~ B 1 4 BUILDING EL I 0 ' Q!! u Q I J a ~ ui D _ L W a b U w I o F-l W y\ ¢ ~ I m ~ z LL- \ I JUN ° 092c8 " w \ a W- Q~ (y \ p e \ p < UtNNING B DE F NTg1/ VEtDPP a Q 00 \ U CItyOF uI..~ Q CtEAR4yptEA _ w I- R' IL o lU 1 I ::T ff ll- I I I I U _ h o I I I - I > 0 1 1 _ v/ d O ' v, b z I 1 L I I a 1 \ 0 I I L I ' up p ' \ I IWIII - - - - 1118191 , C~ I I I ~ t~ \ I I I 1 q \ co S / a 1 V F m I 0 I ~ THOMAS J. GRAHAM NORTH COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL I I I I 0 LICEN5E NO. AA COOOlb2 St FLOOR MASTER PLAN 1 ' e t SCALE: I"= 20'-0" 0 Q \ I 05 - I DATE 0 / ~ L/9/05 T _l: e m DRAWN 0 n W 0 eQ e ro A2 t MAW 0 0 s CHECKED I I m v° a u DS L b ~ U I m ~ ~ G fi ~i c 0 z r ,r DECK DECK ;.r-,r~„ Ir ~,r' - DECK I, I,_„_ - -C ~ - w DECK DECK DECK a DECK DN I-D -F - ERE PORTS COCH ROOF -A I UP DN u~ E E ir~,r~ I m a rc r rc I I ~ H ~ ELECTRICAL I - - - - - - - - - - Q I p I- _ I - a. a. I a ~ y ' -D I Y U U w o I I I I w D 'z I ~ D ------I----- I I-------I----- W "DECK I I I - I ; I I I ~ DECK DECK DECK ~ I ~ DECK DECK I ~ I ~ ' ------I-----~ ! ------I----- ~ I ~ I I ~ w 0 w I I I I O z ~ I ~ z I I I I ~ z z I I I ~ O - O ------I----- ~ I-------I- ~ O U O I - I I I U 1 W - - 1~ W I I I I ~ ~ } > I I I I U U o~ 1- Q h ------I------I ~ ------I----- w w ~ v~ Q I I I 0 - ~ I ~ I I I I o - m~ O U = U =====4=---~ I ~ rr w D w I I I nX ~ I I I ------I----- ~ r~ ------I------I r-- I ~ ~u_ I I I I ~ ~ I ~ W I I W I ~ I I I I ~ 7 ~ ~ I a 3 n_ i------t---- Q ° 3 I~ I I I ~ u. 2 . n I' I ~ I C H- c n -L ~ I J Q u I i I I ~ U Q- C7 ~ ~ o I w w ~ o ~ ~ o I I ~ - I I I o i ~ ~ ------I-----~ ------i----- I I I ~ I ~ i W I i I I H_A - I H-A I I z~ ------I-----~ Y N I Y I I I U U ~ U - I w w ~ o o QC - I I ,.n I I I I h ~ °~r?° ------I------I ~ ------I----- W I 1 I I I I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ UP _ _ - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - ~ - - - Q i ©Copyrighl-Graham Design Associates, P I I I I a' ELEC. Allrighisreservetl. I I I I ~ This material is the exclusive property - - - - - - - - of Graham Design Pssociates, P.A.. I u. RAS I I I I strictly prohibited ~vithoutthe priawritten . DECK DECK I I i ~ O permission of Graham Design Associates, DECK - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ ~ PA. and any such reproduction may DECK I I ~ I ~ subjectyoutodviland(orcriminalliability v I ~ under Titte 17 of the United States Code. DECK DECK DECK I~ I I -I----- Q I ------I----- I I ~ ~L Y I I U U - I- I I _ _ I w w ID a a I J - I- IB >I _ H_A I a. -A ELECTRICAL - - - - - I- - - - - I I 4 d ~ I r"~v"". I Ir Ali U U ® w W E E ~ ~ ~ UP DN r H-A H I-A PORTS-COCHERE Q I-B - -D ROOF 0 -F I-D 0 DECK DECK DECK DECK w DECK DECK I'-"-' ~ ~ ; - DECK DECK „ , _ _g B Y U U ~ Q 111 w W p Ll ~ U ~ n/ b n Q b ORIGINAL uj w 0 w N V~ ~ U Q F ~ N O z j~• HB _D H_p Q mi; ME w z o NORTH w wl fc 2nd FLOOR MASTER PLAN JUN 09 2005 a b Q 9 = SCALE. I'= 20'-0" P IN Rte N w 1- LANN G fl OEVELO E T ;n ~ u- ~ CiTy OF CLEARWATER u = C C M O[ o b z b b ~up 0 0 DN 0 a 0 THOMAS J. GRAHAM H_ H LICENSE N0. i AA 0000'152 n I f b i' o ~ G a Jll 05- fi 0 ' DATE La 0. L/9/03 0 n N DRAWN W 0 N La A3 0 b L MAW 0 7 ~ T N CHECKED r Y m V DS . ~ L V i b i 3 I I _ _ - ~ U r m ~ ~ G fi ~ 0 DECK N z D~ K C DECK - - > DECK i DECK DECK w DECK DN I-F I-D I-A E E . 00 o r t I I 0 w I- ELECTRICAL I - - - - - JI Q - I- d o_ I R i Q = I ~L Y -D U U 0 I 1 I I W W rz I I D O I I-------I----- DECK ~ I I I - - H , I, l I I DECK DECK DECK DECK - ~ I I I I I DECK ------I------I I I----- ~ ------I I I ' I I I I I I I I I ------I----- ~ I-------I----- I I I I I ====d=====~8 I I I I Y Y I I I I U U O u, ------i------I ~ ------I----- W W ~ OM i I I q q ~ I I I I c~c~ ~ r~ I ! I I I crv X _ I I----- ------I---- I )---------I I I I I • ~ I ~ ~ I I W W I I I I I z W V ~ ~ I -I- `o Iv I Q _ z ~ I I - A ~ H _ E H ° I ~ - A Q I Y ~ I I i Y U Q- I ~ I U w w ~ ° ~ , p q I I I ~ - I I o ------I------I ------I----- F- I I ~ I ~ I U I I I W ~ I I ' I ~ u H-A I I I i ~~-A - ~ ------I------, I-------I----- ~ I I I I ~ U I I U ~ ~ I==-==~ w W ~ - I ~ I q i I I I ~ I ------I- ~ ------I----- I I I I I I i ~ UP I ELEC. ©Copyright-Graham Design Associates, P I I I I All rights reserved. This material is the exclusive property - - - - - - - - - - - i i- - - - - - -i - - - - - of Graham Design Assoaaies, PA. I I I I DECK DECK ~{+5 Reproduction in whole or in parts Ls f I I stdcflyprohibiledwrthoutihepdorwdtten DECK I _ _ _ _ _ - - _ ~ permission of Graham DesgnAssoaates, DECK DECK DECK I I I sub ectnd u to a l andlorcomia l liabili~ I -Vr I underTdel 17ofiheUnitedStatesCode. :DECK > I I -------I----- ------I----- I I I ~L Y I I U U I ' w W i q q - I-D ID I al - _ I_ B , ELECTRICAL - - - - - I- - - - - ` -A = I 0 0 a I I 0 a 0 0 0 P ~ aL ~ Y ® U / U 111 ~ 111 E E ~ ~ ~ LD lfl r H-E I- A - I- Q - I-D ID / o -F - 0 u - DECK DECK DECK DECK w DECK b ~ DECK Q DECK . DECK _g _ 3 U U Q w w ~ q O W U n ~ ~ Q J NOR1 ORIGINAL b W NORTH U 0 w - 4 b U a 3rd FLOOR MASTER PLAN ING 4 , .e SCALE: I= 20'-0' HD HD ~ z ~ Y 0 N v JUN O 9 2005 w w ~ ~ o Q b Q PU1NNlNG ©EVELOPMENTSV = Cf'YOFClE4R!NATER P4 4 u- u. 7 U N ~ I.. > = f-! z A b m 4 1 O n `a 2 I N 0 DN ' m b 0 0 _ THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE N0. AA 0000'152 / m b O u'' O 05 F ' DATE 0 0 N n DRAWN U ri A4 MAW t 7 0 0 a a v CHECKED r m U v DS U 3 Y ~U r ~ DECK - z 0 DECK ` a DECK w DECK DECK .DECK DECK -F I-D I-B - 1-A UP DH E E . r x. m' x 4' K rc I i ~ ELECTRICAL - - - - - - - - - - I Q I 1 - I- a I ~I ' I I-D I I I i ~ ------i I I-------I----- ~ I I I DECD DECK DECK DECK DECK I i I I DECK ------i------I I I----- I I I I I ____~_====~4 I I I I I 1 I I ------I------I I-------I----- I I I I I I I i I i200~ B~LOIU i I I I _ _ ~ u`"i ------I------I -------I-- - ~ 4~ I I I I I I I I Mm ~ r~ I I I I r I NX ~ r ------I----- ~ I--------I----- I I I ~ .rw I I I I * ~ s W I I W i m V I I I z t zL z Iv I Q I I o > I u. z I I 0 ° ~ ,J Q I I ~ I I rrnn I Q I I i~ - I I I I ~ ------I-------I ------I----- ~ tt I I ~ I v U I I I I ~ I ~ ~ m I I I ~ I I I I ------I-----~ I-------I----- I ~ I I I c u_ I I I ~ I I I ~ ------I-----~ ~ ------I----- I I I , , I I I I ..i , ~ UP I I ~ ELEC. ' ©Copydghl-Graham DesignAssociates,P I I I i i All rights reserred. I I I This material is the exclusive property i I h mDesi nAssociates PA.. _ _ of Gra a g I I I I Rf~S i Reproduction in whole or iri parts is DECK DECK I I , , sOrictly prohibited without the priorwrihen ! I i _ ; i permission of Graham Design Associates, DECK _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - PA. and any such reproduction may DECK DECK DECK I ~ I I ? subjectyou io avil andlor ariminal liability I ; I I I under Title 17 of the Uniled States Cade. DECK l -------I----- I I I 1 I I I - I-D 3 I >I o_ -B - I i ELECTRCAL - - - - - - - - - - - I-A a I I a R' E E U1 r UP DN c+1 m - I- IB KEPI 6~IOMEN ~ Q - I-D ID I-F - s~A o DECK DECK 'DECK DECK W E K DC ~i n~cK Q DECK DECK ~ Q ~ W U I ~ ~ b NORTH JORTH a aw J w ~ 0 r,< N ~ 4th FLOOR MASTER PLAN ~ N U SCALE: I'= 20'-0' - ROOF BELOW a z ~ JUN 09 200 J a z PLANNING a 0 8 QEVELOPfvicNT w SV(S N N Cf7Y0FGI,EgRWATER a - ' tK a ~ Q Q = w E- a M u- U I n ..G H o s b z a a U7 A A N Q A V / THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA C000152 / EE O Q DATE 0 R &/9/05 0 N N DRAWN 0 N Ln A5 0 MAW V c 0 04 a a CHECKED r a m u • L OS a u 3 Y r U N X DECK 0 DECK ' DECK w DECK DECK DECK DECK -D I-F I-A ~ DN 0 ELEC. ~ ~ Q I- PLANTER r ~ -B - uP I I N UP 0 I-D r Z U w D ' DECK DECK K DECK DEC DECK DECK U W -G 0 U W O O~ ~ a- II ~nm ~m ~ rr ~ nX U I- ~ r4 W Q ? ao W z q z~ 0 _F ~ W o J I ~ ~ - 0 f- ~ v ~ W I- o W ~ I U A N i7. LO CI ~ B - H- W o _ ©Copyright-Graham Design Associates, P AU rights reserved. This material k the exclusive property U - Reproductions alv+ho a orlm parts s DECK DECK I W shictly prohibited wiihoutthe pdorwdtten Q permission of Graham Design Associates, PA. and any such reproduction may DECK DECK subjectyou to civil andlor criminal liablity ~ underTitle 17 of the United Slates Cade. DECK DECK DECK U W O H- - I-D D DN u DN u PLANTER I- - ~ ~r~ -A ELEC. ~ ~ 0 r ~ DN I-A Q - I- I 0 I-D i-D I-F 0 u :DECK DECK -DECK W DECK DECK b ~ ~ Q DECK DECK DECK b ~ d w U u F~ Q u NORTH KORTH d CAN, t ,r. a E W &th FLOOR MASTER PLAN t SCALE: 1' = 20'-0' z 0 JUN 09 2005 ~ _l z PLANNIND w 0 B DEUELaPENTg~ a iI- N CITYQF DA CS a _ TER W, a Q -a _ z w F- I U = E- I o Ln b z u a A > 4 E N Q m m v m THOMAS J. GRAHAM tl LfCEKSE N0. AA 0000152 U m L tl E V~ 0 Q 05-14 ' DATE s 6/9/05 I. 0 0 n DRAWN N r N A6 MAW 0 0 0 CHECKED s DS u B _ r U r m N z DECK DECK N DECK DECK DECK .DECK U) DECK -D I I-F - I- -A UP DN 0 Iii 0 TR i TR ELEC. H I Q -A - - UP I I 0 UP I I-D 0 ~z i ~ DECK DECK DECK DECK I DECK ' DECK DECK i i o~, I a`~- It ~m ~ t' r NX ~ ~ ~ a°°- W z A z 0 J v u V/ O . f- ~ u Uv a~ I a u ~ s W i 0 Copyright-Graham Design Associates, P I AD rights reserved. This material is the exclusive properly i of Graham Design Associates, P.A.. Reproduction in whole or in parts is DECK DECK DECK slddly prohibited wilhoutthe priorwrihen DECK f ' permission of Graham Design Associaies, PA. and any such reproduction may DECK DECK DECK subjectyoulo civil andlorcriminal liability under Tide 17 of the United Slates Code. DECK i i - I-D I DN UP DN UP _ I_ IB -A T6 TR ELEC. c E ~n DN r -A I-B - Q I-D I-D i IF - _ o .r ~ DECK DECK DECK DECK w JUfV D 9 ~00~ ~ ~ DECK DECK Q DECK DECK 3 PLANNINCs 8 OEVELOP4~iENT SUCS ~ ~ CITY OF ~f.ERRWRTER Q W U ~ ORIGINAL u u Q u J NORTH W 0 "a U t - 9th FLOOR MASTER PLAN d) N 0 SCALE I'= 20'-0' Z Q J ~ Q z w b N d) JC ~ ~ 9 _ W ~ U- =3 U I o s r z q o! u a A > O N 4 V l0 4 m u j a" 0 THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000152 N u E V ~ Q a 05 1 (a DATE N 0 R L/9/05 O C14 n DRAWN 0 N A7 MAW v c 0 0 0 s 4 CHECKED r v W u t DS u ~ U ~ dl z 0 DECK DECK DE K [ C w DECK DECK DECK DECK I- I- UP DN . 0 -E O TRH TR ELEC. Q 0 - I - UP UP I-D rz DE K C DECK DECK DECK DECK . DECK °o~ tt ~ rr NX ~ ~ ~ z z~ 0 ~ cn - 0 lY U ~ a~ W _T ` I J U= R li. y to C\1 ~ Lfl ©Copyright-Graham Design Associates, P NI rights reserved. This material is the exclusive property of Graham Design Associates, PA.. Reproduction in whole or in parts is DECK DECK stric~y prohibited withoutihe priorwritten permission of Graham Design Associates, DECK PA. and any such reproduction may subjectyou to civil andfor criminal Lability DECK uMerTiUe 17 of the United States Code. DECK DECK DECK - I- D DN UP DN UP -B - Tf TR ELEC. 0 E E ~ r d1 w' DN - I- B I Q -H 0 -H - I-D ~ o DECK ~ ~ DECK DECK r ~ 1L DECK JUN 0 9 ~00~ w ~ b ~ DECK DECK Q DECK DECK PLANNING fl DEVELOPMENT SVCS ~ CITY OE CLEARwaTER j~[ b ~ Q ~ w U ~ y. b OR C"INAL NORTH m Q A ~ J w 0 N W a b U 10th - t N z 0 SCALE: 1' - 2O'-0* Z Q a ~ z w 0 U Q ~ ~ Q H z I W a u a P4 n ~ F- > O A a v A 4 0 m b a 0 THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE X10. I AA 0000152 v E V~ O Q 05 DATE d 6/9/05 N n DRAWN N Ln A8 0 MAW U C 0 7 n CHECKED 4 V n U DS V V I r U r ~ z DECK 0 N DECK DECK m DECK DECK DECK -D I-B - UP DN 0 i TR TR ELEC. W F- 4 - UP I 0 UP I-D 0 DECK r z DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK o~ a- a- tt ~nm ~ r NX ~ c W z z~ 0 ~ ,o 0 N V ~ a.~ W v I ~ U >n © Copyrghl-Graham DesignAssaciates, P NI rights reserved, This material is the exclusive property of Graham Design Associates, PA.. DECK DECK Reproduction in whole or in parts is strictly prohibited h'dhoutthe prior written DECK permasion of Graham Design Associates, PA. and any such reproduction may DECK subjectyou io civil andlor criminal liah~ity under Title 17 of the United Slates Code. DECK DECK - I- D DN UP DN UP I-B - T~ TR ELEC. -E 0 E E ~ UP DN r I- I-B Q -D I I-D _0 0 DECK DECK 4 :DECK DECK DECK k~ ~ d . DECK DECK JUN ~ 9 ~~05 ~ b ~ ~ Q PLANNING$ DEVELOPMENTSVCS W ~t:TV OF CIFARWpTER J u nn// 6th NORTH ORIGINAL < w ,n v0 W a N ~I U 13th i N N O SCALF- I"= 20'-0" 2 Q w z ~ o N tq a ~ Q P4 w IL P4 U I n I- a ~ ~d O 4 v A A I N Q m a u i a 0 THOMAS J. GRAHAM J v LICENSE N0. AA 0000152 u v 8 a ' DATE 0 0 n Q 6/4/05 0 n DRAWN N b MAW A9 0 0 4 a CHECKED r m L ~ as a b ~ U w z 0 DECK w a i DECK DECK DECK DECK UP DN 0 I- ~ ~ TR TR ELEC. a -K _ 0 I L UP I UP 0 rz DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK s O t.n O~ ~ ~M a- a• t tnm ~ rr nX ~ ~u • ~ ao W z z~ a v 0 U uJ _ ` I U A Lf) W !!1 © CopyRght-Graham Design Associates. P. All rights reserred. This material is the exclusive property of Graham Design Associates, PA. Reproduction in whole or in parts is strictly prohibited without the prior wdUen permission of Graham Design Assotates, PA. and any such reproduction may subject you to civil andla criminal liability under Title 17 of the United Slates Code. DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DN UP DN UP I-I rR rR ELEC. a I- 0 E u~i r UP ON I-I Q -J PP~~ ~ t~~ ~ 0 ~ ~ DECK DECK DECK EK D C DECK W DECK b F-. JU~1 U 9 Q g 3 ~i PLANNING,q OEUEL ~ ~ ~ Q CITY F OPIviTF~rSVC~S ~ 0 CiEAi~lruA,ER ~ 4 ~ U I Q- I f l~. ORIGINAL u ~ Q m 1 NORTH NORTH d w 0 ~ W 4 ~ U PENTHOUSE MASTER PLAN i UD N ~ O SCALE: I"= 20'-0" Z J feF R a U z w 0 N a a ~ Q Q = H w 1- a u a U N UJ 0 t~ z a a u a I a `o S I N Q i a U a 0 THOMAS J. GRAHAM m LICEK5E K0. AA 0000152 U 0 L N n Q a 05 / ' DATE ~ GI9/05 N 0 0 n n N 0 Alo DRAWN N MAW 0 U L 0 N CHECKED 7 T a u DS v a tl L U I' Y I U I m Q uNEH °0 o BATH 0 s-s' x e BED OM .BAT BAT rz-o• 5'-0' x -5' 5'-0• x -5' UTILITY - BEDROOM O e'i' x s'-Y ? ? I Hri' x r3' AHU WAL -IN CLOSET O AHU O AHU i BEDROOM °H UTILITY - MASTER l UTILITY l x a-~ i BEDROOM v-o• x q-r MA5TER ~ Y-0' x 7-I' _ o KITCHEN ~'-a• x n'-o• BATH ~ _ $E OOM 8--3' x e'-s r-s x IY-9' 17 N r'a• p 0 , _ o ~,g~~,~ - I~VErI ° LJ ~ p ® LYJ © ° Q • l ? ? ~ ~ DECK to - z DECK DECK - - 0 ° o MA TER DININ LIVING rn DIWNG BE ROOM ATH ~ BATH r-c x l3 0. m-s• x ~'-s• 5 C-0• x 8'i• Q. r-~o• x n'-r LIVING x r-o• s' x e-o' w-r x ~-s• _ ' i I ° KITCHEN ° KITCHEN I 0 ~ a•-o' x e'-r LIVING ° a•-o• x e'-r DINING LIVING I e'-o' x e'-lo' ls-+• x ew' _ ~ n'-3• x B'-r r 0 I r I I - ~ ~ IIII I u 0 0 gra-I~ N~r~l ~ I ~ , I u u i i i CC-JJ DINING i ~ ® KITCHEN AL -IN MASTER I KITCHEN DINING a'-o• x r~'-o• .o. o L05ET BEDROOM s'-0• x m-9• I n'-T x 6'-0• Q I o r-o' x q'-q• I BEDROOM v-c• x r-e• I C LIVING ; I ® _ . Q DECK I I ' I I wrx , I I I I , ° KITCHEN I 0 MASTER MASTER MASTER BEDROOM BAT wH p BATH I• 0 UTILITY 8'i' x '-0• 7-i' x i'-o' ~ p , BATH I I 0 UTILITY %~~.a• ® , I v I MASTER e'-0' x 8'-0' l AMl ~ . 0 ? ? 8'-0' x 5-0' I ~ _ o i DECK ? ? BEDROOM _ w N'-10• x B'-0• AHU O ~ ~ I O - d • 7 ' W H Q I LIVING AREA I,lOT ~ EA IIOI SQ. FT. LIVING AREA I,Ob3 SQ. FT. R ~ o CA-1~,€f LIVING AREA 1,010 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA 1,311 SQ. fT. DECK AREA 138 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 97 ,REA ~ 97 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 138 SQ. FT. z ? ? FT DECK AREA 138 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1,449 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1,804 EA 104 SQ. FT. I tOTAL AREA 1,201 SQ. AR ,8 TOTAL AREA 1,148 SQ. FT. -:~A u u N n - n n _ n a u I - LIVING AREA 1,35 SQ. FT. SCALE: I/8"=1'-0' p= . SCALE: I/8"=1'-0" /8°=1'-O4 DECK AREA 258 SQ. FT. SCALE: I/8"=1'-0° SCALE: i/8 I 0 TOTAL AREA 1,993 SQ. FT. n rr - o,~ 4-1 4 , O~ a- a' SCALE: I/8 -I -0 DECK Mcfl to t{1 ~ r r- NX 0 ~ ,,nn VI w ~ ~ LIVING V' n'-r x I7-s• MASTER z BEDROOFI _ _ _ PAHiRY AHU ygl 'WO z~ a w-4' x H'-L• . ~ uTILITY u. TE -r x T-0' ~ KITCHEN J ~ a I I I i BATH Q lr-0• x la-s• p ~ w~-c• x a'-o• I ~ 00 ~ I 0 I W N I ~ I O I I _ ' - I ' ~ ~ Q • ~ ° KITCHEN STUDY r, ~ r-r x v'-3' V DECK r-0•xo-0' , ~ 0 ° ~ ~ 00 ; O I ~ , _ ° LIVING/DINING ~ DINING ~ ~ p ~ KITCHEN UTILITY ~ ~r-o• x a'-r ~ r-i• x e'-a• r-c x r-o• MASTER KITCHEN UTI BATH n'.~• x r-o• BATH ® w•-o x r_~• r-o• x ~'-o• DINING AHu r-o• ar MASTER IUALK_IN_ ' v ~ ' uta~ r_ 10'i' x r-9• i 6'-0' x a'-C~ 9'-C x B'-a' - BAT If- ° - CL05E7 ; ~ ~ O 10--i• x 10'i' c DINING ~ ~ _ - . ® ~ AHU . - ~ 0 0 0 8'-10' x K'-3' ~ a p, CI ® , ° ALK-I MASTER w Z - BATH Q ~ UC ~~L05 O BATH ? ? a~-r x a'-c• KITC1dEN MASTER a i'-0'x8'-I' y ~ - a BEDROOM ~ EN BEDROOM l3'-r x m-r WALK-IN a'-o' x io~-e' r=r it-o• x n'-s ~ BATH , CLOSET r-0' x 8'-i' ° ? ' I ' o AHU ~ ©Copyright-Graham DesignAssociales, P. _ - All rights reserved. BEDROOM -R - ~ Q ; This material is the exclusive property ir-o' x r-r BEDROOM BEDROOM o lr-o• x e•-~a ? lf'-3' x 17-0' of Graham Design Associates, PA. LIVING , ~x ~ UTILITY a•-o• x sr-o• DECK v-o• x a•~• MASTER BEDROOM Reproduction in whole or in parts is . strictly prohibited without the prior written BATH U'-0• x n'-s• permission of Graham Design Assoaales, MASTER - - 10'-P X a,i• LIVING P.A. and any such reproduction may BEDROOM 15-Z' x 6'-4' ~ ~ vµ MASTER ty"0' x m-T subject you io civil andfor criminal liability $EDROOM underTdle 77 ofihe Untled States Code. .BEDROOM m-0' x 8'i• ~'-1 x lY-o• DECK - ~ ~ ' ' ATE BEDROOM UVING/DINING BATH UTILITY Mr-s• x H'-8' KING u~r x n-o' WALK-IN CL05ET DECK 3' DECK - DECK s-o~ x r-c . r-t• x r-4' - 0 , AHU ? ? 11 I n I i s LIVIN AREA I'I95 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA LIVING AREA 1,038 5Q. FT. LIVING AREA 1,406 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA I,L14 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA 2,024 5Q. FT. G DECK AREA 604 SQ. FT. DECK AREA DECK AREA 281 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 95 5Q. FT. DECK AREA 215 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 21L SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2,399 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA TOTAL AREA 2,305 SR. FT. L AREA 1133 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1,621 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1,830 SQ. FT. ~ TOTA r n n N Ir N - fr - n n er _ n Q . SCALE: I/8'=1'-0~ SCALE: 1/8"= 4 . 4-'- ° SCALE: I/8'=1'-0" ~ Q SCALE: 1/8 =1-0 SCALE: I/8 -I 0 ~ ~ SCALE: I/8 -i O 0 u. JUN Q 9 1~ ~ b ~ PLRI+iNING ~ D~VELOP~~~ ' CITY 4~ C . LET SVCS Q CEAPI~fatER ~ b « Q w U MASTER I I I ! I r BEDROOM _ _ PAHr~Y ' Q a., i ~J 151• x B'-0' ~ - I ° ° ~ ~ WALK-IN . ~ S---Ta A ~T'-- ® ? DECK , ---I U I ILI I I BATH LO ET b r-c x r-v 1 ptcHr~ ~ aw, ~ KITCHEN rx x rx ASTER r~ x era A00 KIT x EN TH I _ B UTILITY I L'7xB' 10'i' x 10'-t I - ~ Q i)QUHG i r-s:rr LIVNG I z 0 0. it \11 kit - I - J ri-Y x 7-0• ' BEDROOM W U WALK-IN rrx x ~i N CLOSET 0 BEDR00 ~ n'-3• x s'-; BEDROOM W-3, x W-2' ururrr u U A ~ z DINING - b r; x``` Frei . KITCHEN ATE AL -I Tr 00 P~. x r-(r j N g a x a a 6AT14 CLOSET O MLK-K O a'd' x a'i' U - CLOWT j r-r x rw i i W, W, E1[ o z = LIVING/DINING MAT w W-' x xa-r BATH 3 ~ HASTM BATH ® lad' x r)'x MASTER aOW7 rf xc r i LM T W x 1Yfi BEDROOM LL -1 F01 0 tz-0' x e'-e• BATH n Q FO 0 > L1K~t . F--1 v~j - BATH r-rxx BEDROOM UI LIVING F1 0 Q ~ LIVING/DINING neu 011 !Y 0 IF-P x W -v m z W-2, x Pri n w-3' x 29'-r BEDROOM > CLOSET CLOSET UTILITY xp•_0• tl HASHER Bc~RmooOO 9EDFOOH MASTER r-0• x10'-ir Li - ni xr- ff9 f=9 BEDROOM i 12'-0' x B'-3' i I u~ - _ I o a F Bm00M p F1 W DECK R b J - v-a x BATH KITCHEN El - ? BATH POW ER r-r x 1r-a STUDY DECK O O BATH I x r DECK I CK J I Z I U c _ THOMAS J. GRAHAM 0 C-7 LICENSE NO. = AA COOOl52 u E u' 0 Q a LIVING AREA 2 11 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA 2,255 SQ. FT. ~ DECK AREA 3111 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA 2,210 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA 1,226 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 913 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 98 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 308 SQ. FT. DALE TOTAL AREA 3.183 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1,324 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2,419 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2416 SQ. FT. N n n D 11/9/05 OM N_ n ro N I- En I BEDROOM 01-Fu DRAWN 3 BEDROOM o 0 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0' ° SCALE: I/8°=1'-0" SCALE: I/8"_ -I 0 00 All MAW n a xl r CHECKED DS a m u a V 3 - Y 1 V 1 m Z O 5 w Q i i I ? LIH9i Q 1 ? ? O d MAC LINEN Q BATH ? ? Iz a? o Nr-c x r-r 1]dSIf~ BATH r-o' x rr-r f19sIEB ~ ~ BEDROOM _ - A T BE 00 M S ER DR M M-r x 6'-Y rr-r x e'-r - ~ C ET rr OSET DECK _ - I - ? ? ' LINEN wu~ DECK BATH ON ~ •r u? BEDROOM BEDROOM g-d x g-1• x °~-T BATH n'-r x ~'-r a- I I ~M 8'-0'x8'-0' `^.l O mcc) ~ r ® d 0 ' i~ d_ NX - o BEDROOM C ~ p'~' x p'-i' UTILITY ? ? N-0'x8'-0' • ~ ~ - 1'-Y x 8'-0' v- I BATH LINEN O s UTILI ~ y O x r-0 POWDER - c-8•x8'-0' L. P,~xrer - _ KITCHEN a 0 BEDROOM O BATH r-r x w'ao' ~ d c'-o• x s'-o' A/H ~ MASTER Ir-0' z p'-o• ' O r BATH O ~ BATH g-0. x g_~. CIJ UTALK-IN BATH ,O r CLOSET _ UTILITY to-c x rri uie r r ~ -0•'s c-0• x s'-o• KITCHEN _ ' BATH -1 ~ a - n-0• x s'-r 0~ ~ ~ r-w• x rr-r ~ LNIN BATH ~ r - IL H vH , A ? ? A/H W/H N'-1' x B'-Y 10'-L' x G-i' O ? ? •-t' r r • - i(1 I 17~ W Z O f' ~ J DINING - WALK-IN v b'-T x M4' u~ CL05ET DECK ? ? MASTER BEDROOM TER BEDROOM - ~ ~ ~ ~'s x ~-g DINING MASTER BEDROOM L DECK w-s x e• ® ® I ~ s-o• x s-a• x rr-r ® r ~ ~ _ ~ ~ LIVING I KITCHEN i r-0' x b'-0' _ I ® H'-I•xu'_p• MASTER BEDROOM N ® ® ~fi x 17-0• U ~ BEDROOM I ® ® I s ~ y 10'-9• x IY-r ® ~ s ~ ' gINING ' X ~ `l ~ ? ~ a-3' x 6'-7 ~ ~ s o ~ ® DINING W-r z 12'i• s uVING q'-0' x 6'-3' ' 0 LIVING KITCHEN MASTER BEDROOM 13'-x' x IE-1' r-0' x R-0' s 12'-1• x IT-0• r ©Copyrighl -Graham Design Associa(es, P 1 1 s All dghis reserved i I s BATH ? ~ - u-r x rr-1• DECK This material is the exclusive property of Graham Design Associates, PA. AL -I DECK Reproduction in whole or in parts is strictly prohibited without the prior written ' CLOSE DECK permission of Graham Design Associates, P.A. and any such reproduction may ? ? ? i subject you to civil anNor criminal liability under Title 17 of the United States Code: LIVING AREA 1,5SG SQ. FT. DECK AREA 283 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 1,839 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA 1,904 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA 2,104 SQ. FT. LIVING AREA 2,668 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 194 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 338 SQ. FT. DECK AREA 422 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2,098 SQ. FT. TOTAL AREA 2,'442 SQ. FT, TOTAL AREA 3,040 SQ. FT. u n n n ~ n n n n - - ~ N. / N N- i~ N ~ SCALE: I/S -0 SCALE: I/8 ~ SCALE: I/8'=1'-0" SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0° llI lA r Q 8L 0 OL _ _ ~ W F- Q AC b Q JUN 09 2(E~~ w U ~?~~lu!!~C ~ DEUEL4~M~ NT aUCS t}F' CLE,4R~r~~R ~ u Z Q ORIGINAL o w ~ b u ( N 0 z N ~ O Q N z b Q a u- U N F I r v Q 1 /I Q Y/6 0 b z A a N m V d O 7 L THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000152 L U E u 0 Q F m DATE 0 0 F IL 6/9/06 h co 0 b DRAWN N N c 0 A12 MAW N a a 9 r CHECKED b • C •9 DS U i V } r m N Z O N 5 w r Q BARREL TILE ROOF i p BARREL TILE ROOF s' SCORED STUCCO 5^-a- - ~ SCORED STUCCO ~ z N ~ CORNICE STOREFRONT CORNICE m r ~ n N STOREFRONT ~ , r I ~ N ~ ~ N TOP OF ROOF - _ _ _ _T_OP_ OF_R_OOF - - .178'-8~~ 178=8" - O O r _ iv i N_ PENTHOUSE I I II!III I I l dill! ' ~ ~I I~ I Ili ~ PENTHOUSE IIIIIII. II ~ 166'-8" O~ 166'-811 ORNAMENTAL ORNAMENTAL ~ m ~ O~ RAILING RAILING ' o_ o ~ l i .I ; III tlll~ 'il IIIi I II Ii, ~ hill _ 13TH LEVEL m~ - r ~ 13TH LEVE1 111 I ~ Il,l ~ i _ ~ ll) --1 ~ r ARBOR ARBOR ARBOR ARBOR ~ crv~ 12TH 1EVEL u~l~ i~llli lh~l. lip: ~;Ii~I i11,; I I iIIIIIIi . . 12TH LEVEL ~ - - - - ~ ao o- u1 ~ m W `r z o o o Q o ~ ~ 0 IITH LEVEL {ll~lli~ll i,~flilll Illhli , l~I) 'VIII III Illlill! iiil iii Ilillii!I _ _ _ _ _ _ IITH LEVEL - Z - - o ALllMINUM O1i WINDOW o_ u UAJINDOW M O ,il;!; !I H~~I! ~;,,;I' II! Ili,i uililil~l Iulliln, IOTH LEVEL 10TH LEVEL ~III!III ; illlih! ~ O ORNAMENTAL ORNAMENTAL ~ ~ - RAILING r 0 RAILING O ~ CV I _ # ~ III Iii ~,I!; ,Ili 9TH LEVEL I!II~IiI Iliii~i,l. ul;ll,lj I. ~ulII 9TH LEVE1 U u STUCCO N uo BARREL TILE RDOF STUCCO ' - ~ v FABRIC ~ - o FABRIC i.ij ji,'"' I,liiil' ~ AUINING5 AWNINGS I'liii!i i' i' ill CORNICE j,ll,i,lil ,hlII,II 8TH LEVEL ~ 8TH LEVEL !Ih{,iill I ORNAMENTAL RAILING ORNAMENTAL ~ RAILING - u m o ~ .~,~:n O r w . ~ +'Iii l - ~ ~ - 1TH LE_VE_L________ Ii,III~ ^~~:z~- 3 Iililill~l 1TH LEVEL ~ ~ 'I;i I~i,~iii i :~I{ ~,ihli II v a v c v !,i1.11!I!I11! iNll.il,lll!I!I: ~;l111;1i!,1~~ lihlll,i~!I,~ If I'IIj II 1 l~: ~ i I~ ltij j Ili li' :~~I~~I~iI III 1 I flll tl~i~il .II7 tl it„ it II.ItIi~1i II 1 ALUIhINUM WIND0~1 WINDOW M ~ o_ o I I phi' ;~i!II!`I fl,ihl'I il!I! li IIiIII! IIII I11Nil I:I! I:I~:Ii~l) I ~ I ©Copydght-Graham Design Associates, P y tl ~ ~ l~ u ~ l i t i~. I n I lililli 1,11 Illl'Nlll~i! i~lll!ill i i ftlii~ 111,1611t1ii,ll i IIII~.1111 6TH LEVEL d. - All rights reserve 6TH LEVEL nlll~l, - v v v a v 81'-4" v v a o v 81'-4" This material is the exclusive property of Graham Design Associates, P.A. ro ~ Reproduction in whole or in parts is O_ strictly prohibited without the pricy written i - O Ali I ,I Iiii' I ~j; j; j I~ iIII' {i permission of Graham Design Associates, - i II'I - - ii!t!ll!'i!liiillill liilllli'ililHiil!I il!!iiUl it IiIH!'Illli ii I i!i!i! 5TH LE_VE_L 1~~+~L~i ~---q-~ i lili!llllli li I illllif I ?IILi I il, uh~i uuil, l,ll, .IL' li,illi~~i 5TH LEVEL PA and anysuch reproduction may subject you to civil andlor criminal liability Ye d tl underTille 17 of the United States Code. m r , l I . TOP OF GARAGE o TOP OP GARAGE ~ ~ . 4TH LE_VEL____ 'IIII! iil I~I~lLIh 47H LEVEL 60'-Ot~ 60'-0" - ~ ro ao _ SCORED STUCCO o ~ SCORED STUCCO T _ o_ - - •r ti7E7~ 3RD LEVEL - 3RD LEVEL '/~.C'~?ZD ti7EZU c _ ~ l 5021?Jf ~ i - - 0 0 - ~ m ~ - - - - ~~yy-- - r r n _ _ 2ND LEVEL - - _ _ _ 2ND LEVEL _ - 6 i c- r M~ - ~ w r ~ _ - - i - ~ - W 30'-0" GARAGE ENTRANCE ~ o GARAGE ENTRANCE 30'_0" .~,r..~~._._._._._._.._ FOUNTAIN GARAGE DOOR COLONNADE N 28r-D" FOUNTAIN GARAGE DOOR COLONNADE 28-0" " d1 0 i Q I N O N _________VILLA _ ~ ~ ~ _ VILLA-•----~-•-~- 16'-0" ts'-o^ 0 6.F.E. ~ $.F.E. 12'-0' - O ° !L e I- ~ i , w b ~ - SCALD: I/IG"=1`-O° _._._._._._._._._o'._._._ L ~ ~ _ 0_0"_________ ~ ac ~ ~ m ~ JUN ~ 9 ~C~ z ~ o u Q PIANNlNG $ iDEVEtOP~ w CRTY OF ~ EPu7 SUCS ~4~NAT~R w 1_ v b ~ A Q VI W W Q ORIGINAL 7 111 J Q N I N N 0 z o ~ z W Lu o W - N u IK 9 Q z = w a H Z 9 N q 0 ~ b z A R 9 V I N 9 4 m u i a J THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. n AA C000152 V L U E 0 0 Q -i DATE N 0 0 N 4 L/9/05 m 0 c u c A13 DRAWN MAW 0 -i a 0 CHECKED u v u a DS v L v u i i i i TILE (ROOF i r~doF Niue I ~ ROOF UNE i ---I - - - ECK RESIDENTIAL ~ STAIR LOBBY O I - ~ I 3rd_ FLOOR _ _ _ Z 3rdi. FLOOR ---1- 01 o_ STAIR LOBBY ~ _ O O ~ ECK ~SIDEN7IAL ~ O FABRIC AUJ~11NCs ~ TILE ROOF 2nd FLOOR O ~ LE ROOF m lu Zn FLOOR N O '.I p z LL ~ O o,,. O Iz ~ ~ 0 ? ~ I STAIR LOBBY ~ ~ ~ ARCADE RETAIL 'n W O~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a FOUNTAIN ~ Iry N r~ FI t FLOOR _ _ U / ~ FIRS7 FLOOR U a - ~ cn w w I z ~ W ~ _ U N o ~ - ~ ~ p ~ I i 'A' - ~~JI]C,D][I~G ~ECTIOI~T - ~~JI~.DII~TG SECTION ~ ~ ~ N BARREL TILE ROOF C PARAPE -PARAPET WALL a ~P~PA CORNICE 7NS mrtaYl h Ne mclnM popery ORNAMENTAL ALUMINU RAIL WITH FA AUJNIf~I~sS -ALUMINUM IUINDOWS °f"e1enDB1pn"°eatlabe'P'"' avnunwmsw~•~n WITH FABRIC ~a~w~.~ow~~oe.e.. AUJNIf~ICsS PA~adnn+~~a~ue~~.,, ~0 D ~ ~ ROOF LINE - - O~IAMENTAL RAILo 3rd. FLOOR - o - - - - - - - - ~.1 O ~ 2nd FLOOR - m - - - - - - - - o FIRST FLOOR W~1 M ORNAMENTAL PLANT BA~L TILE ROOF 4L PLANTER STUCCO KEYSTONE N RANI F+~ _E ROOF STOREFRONT WINpOWS ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ O ~ o Tgy C ~7 ~~l V Jl.i?7 ~ 1 . ' J~ ~lJ JLd.i~JLl~ ~ ~~J SCALE: 1/16°' 1'-0" LL " ~ W ]E]L]EV1~TIO1V o~ D ~ ~ W JUN 09 2II05 (g~ ~ ~ ~ P ~aH~GS VELOaMEtd?gy ' Z ORNAMENTAL G!YF CLEA FiWA~~ER ¢R W ORNAMENTAL g 7YP. EMBELLISHMENT HT. E BRACKETS BARREL TILE ROOF PARAPET WALL PARAPET WALL LL BARREL TILE ROOF BRACKETS ~ 0 Q BARREL TILE ROOF pq(zAPET WALL PARAPET WALL ~ u p CORNICE DECO COLUMNS WITH FABRIC BARREL a= a ~ uvi C ALUMINUM WINDOWS CORNICE ALUMINUM WINDOWS ~ W ~ BARREL TILE 'A'LUMINUM UJINDOUJS CORNICE ALUMINUM WINDOWS W WITH FABRIC DECOR COLUMNS WITH FABRIC AUININCsS ,G a ROOF x~ a o a AUk~11KCsS ARBOR Z ~aRBOR WITH FABRIC AWNINGS gRBOR AI1.N1NGS TILE ROOF p£o F 1 /T` o y~q~ ~ Ciii~ ~W o RNAMENTAL ORNAMENTAL RAIL Q 0 ?0' ROOF LINE (p o ~ z > N ORNAMENT,L~ ~ p~ ~ RAIL RAIL Pnn 3rd. FLOOR ~ i am 6 111 m 3rd. FLOOR sm on El ORNAMENTS, a RNAMENTAL. nn,n ago PLANTER 9 0 ~ _ -nmn nm p ~ PLANTER 2nd FLOOR m Elm I rd a- m - 2nd FLOOR mom I F__ r b z D O O Q I/ r o ~ ago m FIRST FL ol;i4 FIRST FLOOR i B RRE TILE ROOF SCORED STUCCO SCORED STUCCO BARREL TILE ROOF` STOREFRONT WINDOWS FABRIC AWN[ Z- S?UCGOCORED STUCCO SCORED STUCCO P ERIC AWNING RAIL STOREFRONT WINDOWS O i ORNAMENTAL TRAIL STOREFRONT INDOIUS ~ I I STOREFRONT WINDOWS RETAIL STAIRS RETAIL ! RETAIL STAIRS RETAIL ELEv TORS THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA C000152 B A E 05-16 DATE „z„os A17 DRAWN ]ET. HARRISON - BUILDING E [1VG ELEVATION CHECKED scNIX: in6^ = r-0i^ _ Y ! U r m 1' N Z O 5 w ! a d ~ z BARREL TILE ROOP ~ v-ui c a' II _ cAM - - - mcn ~ rr r ~X ~ ~ ..nn r~ `1 N J r ~ v! ! ~ ~ ~ _ iv a- ~ ' ~p 0 - / i 0 ~ 0 ~ TOP OF ROOF _ _ _ _ _ _ ® - - z 178'-8' - - - - - - - - - z~ 0 O I SCORED STUCCO 1111 III 11111 ,:I lli, I 1.11 111 1 .111 ('1 1.111; 111,1 li ! :IA ( lil I' lilt .III" 1 1 ,I i III { 1V 'I I f ! ii ii I. J II! Ili . ! ill ~ 1'111 ..l -~-a I I' I~ ; 7 I ~ I ~ I I ~~f II ~ I'1' I' C 11 l;l I V it 111;11 II; 1111 i !{I•~i II'{i 111, ' li I~ {i; i I I i ; I I I 1 ~ I' P_ENT_HO_USE ~ ,Li L I . 111.1., .!L.l ,I 1 1111 ,.11,1i11Eu.,,lll 11 IL' la;l 111,11, I ,!11N11' ',11 1l.n!ifllll:)t1 1111.!i11!!ll!11111 i1li~l 11.1111 !l,l I lill!111 l,ul!lii i 111., 111 ii. ;lhl 1.: I. 11 . ~.I,lil;n f 11.11 ~ i ,1111 III~IIII~i.11 1.1.111 i il; 1111{.~ II~~' ~ ~ o 166'-8" ao { O_ N - 0 N ~j ~J t ll~l 'li1'. (111;11 ~ 1111!:1,if I;il '1!1'91!': +i' ;L ,j~1j ~,„III p: 41 'Iili';1;1±111"I, Ifl'I'If'H" V{;!.i A~l';N11'Iilllf i I`Il 1111'111 fll' .ii .li 111. i'• I! ii;!'! 13TH LEVEL !!!I!111'Il~!fl1 1{1!111.1111111!1111 1 111 l 1111111 Ii! I,ii!~I!ll{1111,1111! 11111111:1 ~ill,li11,r 1, 11 !I li,,l'111E111i t1! yl., 1.1111111 II1111111!11111 i!f! ,1!11 it .,ill" 1' 111111!1: If;!iill 11;11 I''i' 1''I I I, 111'•111 'I, IN4 ,I Ill 11 1 I'11j~+i I' i.• ' +1.111111 ~1 ~il11111 ill ;11.1,1;1lllll qi .~I~il1 it 111;1 Jia 111 111 1;11;1,11 !1!1ih11 ~ , I ~ N ARBOR ' ! :I III" .n, I I;.1;! ~ 1 i Y: ! II (~l 1111 1111 ~ Ijl , I'I' "I !'tl:' ; i'! 1 i i 111j:n •il ::I I' :'1{(i!",1j'i1111 ri I'' 1 !li 11,'i't,"' , (ijt 1PI1'; i'1!' 11 ,ul ' i 'il!~ I" 1 ' Il 11> 1111111 1 l 11 1111' 'Ili ' { I' 1 ! 1~1 I ! 1. i 1 I .1 Ii. 11;1! 12TH LEVEL .l...u1'F,I ! !11.,11.1,111!;1:1!11 1 11111111. 11!1141 II!1~11.1 i¢ il. 11.111 L11„1,1,1. 1:11 II'j7n:,, !11.,1!1 , li Ili !J1,11 ! 1 ..!1;1,11.1 1l) ifi 11 Il.:ll 1'1.11!. 11 1'11`11..., N 1 ' { 1!~' ~'I III f {'il I I' I II;I:r,1q:{~.I,~~1,„i {:;1'1'~iI' 111 1 ~,,,1, U II~Iflll~,11111.; 1 '~11 1il} !I~!1;1~11;1J 11n 1111,11{ 4111'11111 I~IIU:II:IIIJ1111u11111111 111111! ~ U Il:ul: 1' _ ~ I ~ uo C 0 ~il,l;~~,rn;. ,l;r,~ ,i:I., ,,~;;I1;. ~ 1;; n~~ra~ ~ ~ IITH LEVEL 1'lilliih!!11'fl~l~!! ;11 Ii ill~lll'i1 ' ~ 1111111 1111!1111,'iil!. Ilinilllillili 1111!111 'Illlllll!IIIIi~IIIU! II'Ifliliiulh111lI~~~l1.;'Iiu111111!I%111{'!111'~'I 'Iwlllll;llnlulh~l{11.ib jl,llull Ili111111 I 1 III1~!Ilill 111111NIiIl}Ih111JIL1111i111~111L1111'~ ~ it i I . uulli il~'llh ~n u°°, ri o_ _ 111 / n~,;i', 1a:, I,u 1i1f" 111(l'~: fl i11!i! "1';1111 11,11 '{i 11 11: 'r"i 111. rl,q~l::p1:1 Ijl'11p 1 :11' 'I" 'II I:f~ ;il !III 11 IOTN LEVEL # i t 1u1,I11J,1,11,1i1i, i?11111111 dl ;,tali 11 Irn .u If111,1w111 ~~~Ilill :11!'1111 I'lllll~ 1 11111111,11 11LIItl, f luli 1111111! 1 !ill : II hu' 1!111 1!1;111 Ill I)l1f1.1:!:I)Ilfl~'1!Illl~ ~ i I ill II' 1111 ,1 I l l I• 1'llJ ~ 111 1, ~ ~ fh , i III' " I~ 1 1 Iklill I Ilj'{' 1 1 ~I'1111i1 1 1 11{ U ~ Ili lil1~ 1 1 l'i ; I ;II IiLir I:I;inl,i1111lII ~11,1i1'i6!(~I IIII !11iA; IL' 1.; +1111::1? ;111,11!; ,l,,,llrl 1,111111 11;11'i1111i11;111i;1 1111 II 11111,11{Iliifil ORNAMENTAL RAILINCs ©Copydghl-Graham Design Associates, P All rights reserved. This material is the exclusive properly ALUMINUM WINDOW of Graham DesignAssosiates,P.A.. 0 Reproduction in whole or in parts is .'I 1'If r .1`. i"il'' I1•~jR'll jll;l I .ii `111111 1.:11;111' j 111'~i' II ;1'I , 1 t11J'1 I' "1{u shictlyprohibitedwithouithepriorwritlen ~1 ! I { 1 ' 1 d`I 1~llil,' Il I 1~ II II' - v111'll i'!~'1 11111'1'1 i; 1j' i I; (lilt i, 11 "i;!,n ! 1:1 {ili` i l 1 111. 1 1 c r •1 I' 1 11 1h I 'i 111 1 1 1 11' + 9TH LEVEL__ _ _ _ tt'"~'~~ ~u1 !11 : ,1111,11. rfl .1!1111.1 L.II 1.111111111,111,111 _ ll~llfll urllll.Il ;1~ I nl 1,11111 i!1ji ~I(;Iialll .1 !11 i 111ht1i a !all 11 1,~,~ 111, :Nk11 , ifl,jG;j, ~L,li~l,il•~:I 1. ~ lil~li , eiLlllll !I lnil,l I ; u i i, 11111 .Il111;J 1 1~1,Illr .;,1;11 11.1+fl :i permission of Graham Design Associates, PA. and any such reproduction may CORNICE underTdleul7of~ eUnfledStlateslCode. 1 O_ 8TH LEVEL t ~ "!1 lll,!i'il!lil!i!iiil111iNi!!;! ii!I liill!IIlI it q!I!;I!11 illl!''I'iil!I li:iliii!lillliiillir, ~'Ilil iliN !,1!11111 ! i 11111111!!Iiilliii111liili !?iii;!!illililli!liili!III'Ilfililil!i' IIIIN' 11 i If 1 In , ml 11 { ~ I 1 1 1 ~ 4'; 11 11 I ; fl ( I llil1il111irlllllliiii Ill~li .(1 ±11.11,11111111! 11 illlillllilLlllli1f111 Uilll!inHllllL,lui1, f II,iIIfIlVill! 1 FABRIC AWNINGS PARAPET WALL 1 r r . o_ ~ +111 l~` :i !r ' 1 ll u1r 11 1 1111 ',1 I I i 1 fi, " 111`1, t 1 jr 111!( F i n 1 I . I, I 111 1 I 1 t, 1! ~ 111!1 hfil I1" 'Il N , n a. r., ! 1,n11!'I 1 1111 {fil I. III r I 1 1 1~ i, 11 11 1 i• I 11 { 1 1 1 1"I!' ~•I 1111' m 1.11.1 1 11u: 1 1! I : 1~ II1 11111;111!1 ~ ~1; a~l ill !I 111,1 ;1111!111' il~l~; 1. il~ul ;!1t~ u1f 1 ~ ;I ' _ _ _ 1TH LEVEL 1TH LEVEL Y.f, , 1~1h1:11lII11''llllll ~111'!i li(I 1h1 . ,!!!11111! 11,1l1111!f ~ lu,l:" { ,,I~IIu 11'ii!i11~1 ,i{l 1111:1 1• II{'I t 111 ! ! I i 11111 ill .Iliu~.hl 1"11 'lll.] , - N - _ 11~i11 'll If1111'Il,{ ;Ilh 1.!~, 11;1,111 li I 1 O_ 0 ~ 1A 11, 11~i 1 I 1 I,i1 ,1„ I1 11 ! 11 I I 11 ;1 1' 1'I ~ 1 111' 111 ; 111 'li' I'1 'I'1 {1 ! 1! ii~l 11111 111.1 I{ , '1 1 1i1j11 li ill) 1111111 i I 6TH LEVEL H111; 11 ,{t1! 11..1111, 111it ~1 111 ILlIIII II , 1,11111 i! 111 1 a. Iai'11 I I 1. 1 111,' I, it 1`! 1 !11.11,'1 11.111,{I L •11. I ~ II 1 ,r , , 1 u :.II 1111: l (I! 1111{ill I 1 I h1;1J1j1 I I 1~{;j;. li 11~1t11, 11111 111111 I '~1, Ili 1:Ij ~I;hl I {111;1 v 1 I I 1 ';'.I 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 li' ~ 5j: y,vi i 1 u if I i,; .U.II t i f~ ! I ~1~ 1 1.1;,1 ;.,I IIIIIt 11111;11 ~ , 1 i~ 1ni .i, 1; .rl llf1,,+I I 1 11,.11 ,,1 ,;1I. i'~I ' i)%i).+ _ _ _ _6T_H_LEV_EL_ 81'-4" 81'-4' uo 1 So ! O_ lj~l1 : 11'411:11 ! I'I' if ; 11 li I! I'"I 'ili H 1 I'!f'1 i II ill I 1{ : 1111'1!'1' {'1;' 17' II'I:il i..I i... r (il'1i41j'1'i + 1 I 57H LEVEL ~,~~:1 ct 1 !:111:1111:111 Jll~l 11!11 .1.111111h!!11!I!!Ilhl,llu) illill,l11i11 1'1111,1111111111 Ih,11! ail ni111111 ,!!111;11, III Illlllli!I!! Il,i!1 a r1i ll1' 1!11!111!1, 1111:11111!Illi ,11111!1 O_ 1'I 1'41 'I I 1 I 1 • ~ 1 1 1 :ii I~1 ~I i lj. I I'I'ii 11 {~I ' i""'1111 1''I ;Il,ilil~il" 1 1~ IIIII ! ~t 17) 1; + 1 ~ ~11111111i1 111,11! ~111h1'11:1LIi1111!llilll,l~lll l1111i11i1i1{III.lilil! 11 ,1'lll'ilil.hil:J !;1i,1111;;i1,111.1 1i1111;11111~,! it 11111 ,1;111 llll!lii!ul . 1 ~l~ bTH LEVEL ,n r c0 _I ~ ~ ~o I 1 ~ TOP OP GARAGE E TOP OF GARAG Q 9TH LEVEL j~,1j1t'~„ !II C11111'41~;I1;1!+111?11 Illia 1!11111!!11 1 li. ILiill 1111 111111-~~I11111!I !nl 1 ! i;ilh. 91.!.1 II!~i:~i!Ijllll;'! ail 1111111 !111!11!1 li 111 11(1 j1 !~1i11 i1'„11111.1 ll!'.iai!(11i11+'llljlf hll_1 11j';.11!iIINi''lilll~ ~l~iilillill . ~ I' 1i!IIl~iil111 L11111~ f1.;1:~lli ",1 I I!' ' 11 i ~ qTH LEVEL (fi I of l~,;l; i .1 1. u I 1 i I-l,.i, ~rlll lil.lilli fi - Q 60'-0" - ao Q ao I - _ O - I ~ O JL 7>ll I;'IP„ 1'Ilri ;111'11!'1 i" '!h :i'I 1'; 1,111"; 111 r~ ,11 'I ! 'r, f -'If Il ! { 1,1: , i'p! 1~ . 7 i;{~, Y 1{ I I:'. 111' 1 1, I' 1 i'1,:;, 3RI} LEVEL ~ II1':111J'I,,~IIiIIIL11'lii {i ! 1!.11!1111 lull 11f..illnl!11ii 111llll~~lliul,111111;1!1i11?1i~ P 1.11' !11,1111 11111! f111h1.1! 1111 ' 111!,1,111'! I!!11'hliwf' 1!1111,! il!IEhi11!IIJs - - 'I I 11111 I 11 11 I li a' i If, '1~1 ; s ~ i ~ 11;;•,., - -1 1 li ~ 1" - 3RD LEVEL 1,!;11:1111,, Ii111I;ililill.l ' 1i;1,,111111111:1!1;11.~1i1 1;111,IIlil~il;liil{f11;{ii111L1111l111~I1i1l11I!+ iljilll;lli,lill{II; 75ri412D't,'/£'!f/ SdZfTJf v' ~ lll ~o I 0 ,1. ~ul 1 1~1 1 111 11 I; 1. 11 O f ~ 3 tj1 11 I 1 11 1 I' j1 I 1!I I' I! ~ `1'1 I 1 1 '11' 1 u' 11!1 i I 1111111 ; ~ 1 II 1 I 1H'11 li it 1i i'11~1~1ji{'III i;i 1 111111 I I I r1 11 lil I!.1. 2ND LEVEL { a ~ lip ..I. il11il1f111 1111111 I I ,~I I„Ililu1.111E ld '~IIII El .11,1.1,1 II.11~11,11! II l ,.III 11111 ~11 1 I:I h 01111 ul,il,11' Ili .I Lli l 11111,1E !I 1111J1111111!lillu, !III !i Illhlllllllj~i,lun ;1'1111 ~ !I 1?lillllllli IIII 11111 II ill Iili!hhll .11'11111111!,1 a I Hllllhl 11! . ~ ~n ~ 2ND LEVEL L - - - - - - - ~ b ~ - - - ~ - P RT -COCHERE ~ I~ a ~ Q ro o, z ~ - ! 0 ~ J 1 Jl1N ~ 9 ~~~5 ~ v - ~ GARAGE ENTRANCE a GARAGE ENTRANCE3on_-o° 1; 1 - - u11 1, I ;1 I; I I I'! ' - ' ; 'i;- - 1 I 1 11;1; ~;I:1 1111 ' O ~ t((1P' ;'1;11 111'11111.1; 'Uir1 l !i' 1 ll ! II 111 ,I ilj IUf;11: it _-~1 111 Ili !i) Ilrli lit tlu,El ! i ! .I 111 I !111111] !11111! 16111! 1 1'11{;!1(1!111;1 I I 41 I it !11111t •15T IEPEL , 1 (1 l 1 1 , 1~1 ~ ! I ~!fl: it 'I J ! I 1 , 1 Il' I ~ Ill II 1 1! _ li , I _1 f II _ i_ 1111 ,~If,. ,L~~. Ililiill!iili'11i;ili!I;11 ~lili•I!Illiil'i~l1;111,.;~I!11L;11•Pllai~!i!I;'i;!!111i1!iN!'1:ii1;1~ ~ > ___________________1~-~L _ _ 171 At~iM1IIA1C D 71c1lr~ nnur • _ J T 28'-0" I Q, uuvcLUrruit N i Gn OF PIFAQWAr~R VC81 3: O i F- N H 3 n - - RETRINING WRLL O N VILLA lil 11111illi ? -a EXISTING GRRDE is B.F.E._ u"R I G I 'N''A L w Q > to J 0 0 1T-o" - z pj ~ b U 0 N cn N ' o z ISLAND VIEW - SfCl-)UTF o-o H )UTH ELEVATION z SCALE: 1/I6"=1'-0" w uj 0 w _N u fY Q z 2 w w 1- u / II 1 a o to z o m a A a {(1 a 4 b d 7 w u THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000152 L U J E U 0 Q a 7 0 DATE 0 N ~ L/9/03 m 0 4 U C cn ro tl A14 DRAWN 0 MAW u 0 "I L V tl OD CHECKED OD DS Y 1 O + m i N Z O 5 w ! Q I O O + Z :r r O u1 1 ~M 6' Q' I BARREL TILE ROOF 1- r rX PARAPET WALL N~ , , ~ >r LL , CORNICE a * ao u ~ (V r I ~ ~ tY ~ r cV - I N O - z - 1 TOP OP ROOF a Z v 178'-8" `p TOP OF R00~ iv 178=8" O + ~ c Q 'O O (V v I II:,, 1.,11;1 1~ .,,,I~li'I'I+'1 i'1~1 ! ! 1'I~I'' '4!°1I III lilp"~11111'Il!I illit PENTHOUSE Q- 1,. ' I II'~j! 11 l~i { I jil 1 ! II+, 1111 I { I'' "f I ! ,ifi lllli,illil;IIIIl1lii:lh.~ 16iiillliL I i11611I11{ {>61±IiI,II((i1'i: L! ~,11, II1,a.1,111lII~h~li!ll,ll,lll~~: it,l,n1~11,,1~.1....1u„111~~.1..' l7 i 166'-8" ,n -PENTHOUSE _ _ , , , 166'-8" no V! - STUCCO ! 0 i o ~ ~ cull Pn:u~. ! ,I, I ~i a ,l."'I I i ,a,{111!IiIII';~~)I nl{' I'I ! I 1„ 11 I {II it n 'i~, i. 11,{({, 1.11{, I n fiii ° 11 y,i„~~ tulip ~ 13TH LEVEL ~iil ,;il; ~fl. ,iL,h~ilil!I i,!I{LI~,,,I +.III I:i.:.~~1 ul,l{,,,,lill.llllul i'Hli,l ,Ilia li.f~ v TH LEVEL '»n,l ;,11~i; I!Ilinllill (l,lfstillifll!11,ill.l,l!I; !n:,:,{,1.I,li.l:{Ilu:li{",~,lidl;, ,1~:1G +III 13 c~ STUCCO o f' u ~o „ i' i ~ il: lir (j u11 ~li' . i Iii111111 11i+111' 1,i11~~ 1 ~ i i.i1.. I Il'! I,1.1,.,,1.,~~. ~ li,.. I 'llll iiltl 1111 !a,il~1,!11i1llulli+l! 1111U1~~ '1.1~ ~.w,,, I i t11 ~ 111.11 ,in1 12TH LEVEL ~ ~ 1 I,al Iq {'I i ~!,{fl':~! jl'lj. ;,ul;!r ,:111'11 {I uI ,}I u ~I II lili^ j`j j !i ~ I i , I' ~ i n. i ~i 12TH LEVEL ~,1,u1;11!~~li !ll..i!I:Illi!L{~{I1; ~.I!, iul.:.~ii.l:;{;t~l:l L{aii{ 1 Ili{ N u a { o ~ O > ~,r'I,,,:i; II,I . { Ij ~Ilil I !1+ I I' i' + i'',jl,j; +i1 lilji 111111i'l111i111111!i~i I{ 11jii111111 i~~l~ 1 Ir IITH LEVEL ~ ~ III ~llil: I illll 1 ~+1 ii~...II .Lili 11 u.. _ _ ~ ~ 11TH LEVEL ' ~ '111, iil!~ii ~ itil.ili''~1'1111i111'i 1!;Illlilli!III'!i!! IIIlIilIIIII III; I~!III N41 ORNAMENTAL RAILING o_ o ,u~l ;1ilu ,s. 411•,' i'1 III; ~r II r11;1i'~~ i;`I'; I' R'1"+, i, Ip , IOTH LEVEL 1111 i11 ~ s!1i~1~u~1;11i ;ij11'ilil ~iliLl~u1 11111n1iful~ul!f11, I II!~ Jlu ,,.:,.}y„ 1,;111 ,111;7 OCopyr~ght-Graham DesignAssociales,P - a II ' !Ilif?!''i'i { IiB tl I I, Ij IIII' I~IIII ~'i { lli'III1111'i( li i'! . IOTH LEVEL I::I 4:!~Iji ~:~i:~ll,l~l;~l „I,ilUl~tli,llillliil 6r I lii,l, .,f~i~1! „.I, 1{{ I ! , . All rghls reserved. This material is the excNsive property of Graham Design Associates, PA. ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ Reproduction in whole or in parts is II. ;li slnellyprohibitedwithoutthepriorvmtten pemirssion oPGratram Deign Associates, O -~n^, N~r ~ ~ ~ { : : ~ it III - ahli tf'" it li. ' 1 ! ! ('ll ! ~ Illli I 1 l'(I{~ I ::(I:I ! ~ s!h }1ii1 ~~I111{'11i11iii1'll i'i111~1i1", 1i111~111{ ~Ilil? 11ii !I 11+1, li!1{i111ui1„11, 11i1~i11 1!~~I 11111 ~1111ri 1(111 9TH LEVEL o P.A. and any such reproduction may subject you io civil andlor criminal Lability 9TH LEVEL 4f!'i VIII :,lllli I ±illsil;iilllihll{iili,iliil!Il.il!L{,i+; i~I~.II.u ::,1 ill l,ll {61.N{I Ili Im 11161 u. ~ under Title 17 of the UnBed Shales Code. ALUMINUM WINDOW , o_ ° ! ~ n ,~I,I 1 u m u' { ~ i 1~1! , 1 1 "I' I ' 111! ~111''I"11111'1111i11i1 iifl, lillillNl! lllilll!IIIIIIII'i11Vli!IillliiNl 111 lilllill111111I IIII'' 11111 _ 8TH LEVEL CORNICE 11, III,+ :illl~~l~,y,l, I, ~"+1 !III I' ~ ~ llli~~111''1~ iii 111lillililllllll 'III!! !:.ll~ul:llllt :1!111111111 i~fllldllltlllilr Il( L111i (ill 8TH LEVEL (1L~ ...I. IIIu1(Li~1,l ILII II, . RBOR ~o ! ~ o_ ! _ ~ ~~n~ ~ n1~^~Y n %~~r,' ~ 'i,• it 11 i. i !1 !i i I~ ~ ~ ~ !II ji it ~1' I I ~ I 1 t'~II I ~Ii. , ~I I ~ ~ ~ :I li ~ {Iiil'1 ; 1 .{1; 1 i'lfiilll" li'It';I`l~i'1 !''1!11!!1 7{{i '-~'S'iri~. ^~J+v*~n ' Vr,..; n .r(~'n EL ' { {i I ! ~Ii~l' w ' 1 I I I ! -~r'" ?~r-},~,,,~ sv_"!~~ ~4~`' ~ - .b+'i ' ( Ifi V: II,I'I ~ Ih : ~ 7; I 11 Ilil,ll.! 1!'. lu ,;h ~ 1TH LEV ~~Il ; ~•illf. .Ji~il{~,~,~.:Dill..lillill~;~IliLi1'Illllli u.!1 11: dll (JLILI,.Ii 1 ~ 1'! I, nt.~~ ,!t{t~, L ~ .~.r~^~`' ~ 111! ~.JI: r~ltli, II 1,+'~I11{'111'il:,li ll{t: ,~I~1,!1,1,1111,I1i1~'ill~1!Liil„I'il.'•'ill; 1111 1THLEVEL _ r ~ - v nl illl r•, l~~Il f'„111,, v a o ;I'll 3'1'iI ;j!!Ii I!I is it{I~,;,{ uo ~Illi~lilll~~l' ~~~i~l~l111i1 , O_ n(!11 !'j Iili 1 f f . 1 . I i „ 1 i~ I : f .Ilia { , I I ! {I j1' "Ili if f't fl ill if{) III Ii{~ (l{ I',~i~11. i~' 1i~1 Ii If 11 ;1!1.,1, ~ LI 11 ~fId11 ~ r I n , I. ~ r 1 I i ~ i "i', f , . i.,+ 1.,,,1 1.11.1 , ~ ~ . ~ '11'' dTH LEVEL f' i I , .li i i t 1 , I; ~1 ,II I. 1. 1 ,i {{{I{11, ! 1 1111+f 1 I) ''1 ~i, i I ~ '11 ii 1 I I` , ,~I 1' 1.,fi { i 1~1111ii1 i:1,1.!:~{~Lla,l.n.,. ,.,I :111„ .L ,1. I„'i,i I , n'.,Inu..,.~,, t la 6TH LEVEL a:_~ fi:;{.{ ,.1 I ~ !I t {.iu:i,, f I {1!11 {{{f!u 1, f 1'{„~ . I l.i.Gl..~,.n l!f 111 ,{1..,.i 1 .u , Ili II I: . v v v v v v a v v ao 81'-4" eo r o i ~,~~IR I' •'I + 111,11 ~I!j I~,'1: 'I 1 1{ j .1111~'lll 11!1(Iliiiliill+ i11l1~1:° ~llll,,l !1!111+111i1i'~I,~11"1'~illil1+1'•.jiii! i 1i!v 5TH LEVEL ~ r - ' "If 'fl'{ II" III l1'i{'{I'; '11.11: I i1!I ji{I'f!i '!il" 111 i1:~ I'~'I'i jf I ,li i 1. i~! ll ~l~i'I llil II I'i~iljj!'I~j~!I j{ .Iljilll;l~. ai X11; , i!(jj 1111:1 5TH LEVEL ilh 11~ 411 Ili`1 Ili IIInIIIIl111h ill:!i4,I11u'II!IIII 11„~~~,:, {~,h::!i,lll,~ ~,1111;h111,,1:1111.1{II .I ,r: I. ~IIJ:L:II i,i, ..l ,....1 , 11:11,1,! ,1111,1,! lilllil~,1,,.. 1.11.,1~J,111~1 li ~ . ~ .IIII ~ 1, ~ f B ILE ROOF ~ ~ r ~o i . , TOP OP GARAGE ~ Q ~ TOP OP GARAGE r {11'I~ nnl"In~ :1 1 !I { , I;li~ , I { 1. 1 + it "i i+.il '11'111 11 + )-j i ~i jl-- ~ ;1jH it Ili !1(1+,111 1111 •.111~11iii II Il,~ I i~l~ Ii,1 Q,III iii ~;i11,1~•1d,:.1,~ I .I+, .~I~,l,l 1i~I .u 1,; LIn L,'~ 4THIEVEL Q _ 9T_H LEVEL ~!I~;; ^ Ire 1,11{(111 fll{lihi~i~li!!{Ifi!~I L~I;II! Ii,lli. I ,IhLU I Il;ll, :111!1 I f! I:,;!1i:,1 I!'~li~l , I~~ I ~i' 60'-D' UJ~ ~ co 0 so'-o° , ~ - O - _ - --a,i ,i+ ~1'' Ir I~ ~ i 111 11+ ~'1',,'i'+I,II!'i~ i{~ 1 1'i ;1+; 111r~~ .i. I"+1.u ~ .it i~ + ~ "-"-'j1,1 u, l+1•:f,.1 ' ni,liu I ,uli~h 1.1-~1 , 11~ :1` 3RD LEVEL ,:,I ,~.,1 it i. 1{, .1,:.,~.L..,..,11~,1.,.,1,..,,, ~ .,,1. _ _ ~ IK till Vli,~~ :{I~I~III;Ii'I~!;111!~Iiilill;i(:II 11,1111I!j!!I!~) l~illl~~~'{i il'I,IIi~~(i) i ~ul{i.11111111111.!Ii~l; ~I'II I 3RD LEVEL ' w b ~ - - SCORED STUCCO ~ Q - o JUN 09 2005 ~ 'C^~" ill '7' ~n 111 I +~i I''1 I II i Il In I+, - + i I II 111t11(1i j1i ! 11 1'! ~!I Iiii I II16:.In111i 11(111 l~i VIII :I 111:.1111 IIIi1:l !11111 III n`t^r~' n nrt S ~ ~ ~ ,ti 111 {qu 11~11~ 1,1f1i1~1,11 II +n I! x;11 Iiii!I~ Ipl I ;1.111111! 111{G 1,1u,1 lill~lLl,llllil,ll ~ ~ ~ ~ nl w, ~ I+., 1, , ,il,~il.t,~ 1 u ~ . ,.U; ill I 1 , ~1 2NI? LEVEL r.,.; Q r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ill 2ND LEVEL '111. NI: 1,16, L.LL:,16~.161.1~1IIIIII,{II!1., { 11...11 ~ ~ n ~ _ _.I - -~.a ~ PLANNING 8 OEIIELOPi~ENT SUCS 4 m - - C~Y`OF CLERRWATER z { - o U GARAGE ENTRANCE ~ ro I1111;Inrtl I,jIL~IIII(li~llj GARAGE ENTRANCE 30'-0" :--;'I!i :{II'I~~i';li ,I ~~I!i ~ f, {i ++111 Ili Iii! II!il I' ~ lillljl'I;I I'I; I : fi! I;u{~I:i!j Iii; IIL.1 1 I'+, ,~r ~ , 1 ~n ;wlll'~ijl ll Ir1,,, : I!i ll ~i1 i li`"" Y iii; ,Ilj{lil'IJ1~I1,1'i{!'11111i1i~;~11' {ill~lil 11111. 1~1 _._._._._._._._._._._._.1rJT~.~~ ~i J 111 ~ ,~''{I 1~.1i!11i1111~1 f111111i11~1i~lIN II!1! il]111~i1~11fILUhli n~~il,,11111•..{t111;i~f~ i,l: I,L ~:,:.,,1L,.i1..11 11~ n ~ -"TT'TYI7Y1'.-.-. ..I!ii . ~.I.i .~li i, { 1{, 11 ~f 1111 ({i I,111,11~111 .11., ~.i ll:llil r1 7 x'1!1111111111.{I...i i~.1I II~.1. fl I'II`i 111 Y{,VIII ~ 1{111 1{111,.... ill !i 11111 r,1~1~1111 it i~ no~_ro, N W _ _ ~ ,„ul!11 j _ IJI LCYLL rv 28'-0" !ICI . O m ,t(ll,H{,1~,,,,~(,~~,:~~,E~,~t,, l,l!!N r C 1i 11 n m m ORIGINAL 'i ~l I ~ ul {i't I!!,, ii!'. W , I.i,1 1..1 i- V~LLfI _ VILLA li Milli I ' i I;,~ _ - Q z B.F.E._ - =7 T - 1r-0° b U 0 N o BRIDGE COLONNADE o m WATERFALL SCORED STUCCO ------------------WEST ELE w ~ z 0 w w _ U (K 0 ~ Q I- z 3: w ~ F- U Z: m/1 U e n = > I- v a Q SCALE: to z A 1 t q d a i 4 h b I 7 THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000152 L U E V 0 ° m 7 DATE N 0 s 6/9/05 Q 0 n v 0 A15 DRAWN ro MAW u c 0 n CHECKED a co Ds m b C V b Y r U I m I N Z O 5 W i r H Q r O fO r Z p twit BARREL TILE ROOF ~ q-a- a- I m~ cA K1 r -r++ ~ rr rX N s~ ~u N O ~ ' ~ 1 r ~ ~ N ~ fD ~ in ~9 O - ~ sr i ~ 1"' TOP OP ROOF Z o - - - - 178'-8" ,L ~ 0 11. O ~ SCORED STUCCO iv '111 ~'II!~ 111,1 ! 'i i'li Ilil'l 111IIIlilii{illillli .III' 111111111! I I~~ii n i{~.~ ~,i II'r. I {lit li + ;m'-,~^-i.,-i•- ~ 1 I, i~ i ~ i~~ i I I I I I~~ PENTHOUSE o~ .I,; ,1611NILII !~,~,III,~IL, hII .I I ..I ~„I~I,L~I Fulfil tUllliLl,~i!~; lit lyl,1{ l11~~u11!!l il~1:11 ~.if,! ll Ili!ili I I~i,!111i ` STOCCO I ~~1hll•~ I~1~~1 ~:lu .,6. l l ~se.~ 3 I 188'-8" I ~ N i ~ ~Ir i n i i i i 1 r,~~ ii ~ n # I 1!11'1111! Ili! 11111 IIli1 lllllltll!iN1!1111i°i~ll 1'11;11 II1L.:1 11 ~i I 1 i' Ihl~ii~l!I!i!;i;lii{I;~. IIII!Illil . liul!It I. Illli`IIL•.Ili!il'lllill,llllh!!II{I 111111 t1ii!Ill'I'i~l,lll !iilLi,Ili:E! 13TH LEVEL l~ ~ i ~ ~ r ARBOR o v !I' :I''1 lug'+' 111 1,, .n Ia~l~lrl 1,,1,1 lil II111!Il,lll:l„I lLill,:la i,ull!~LlJlil lull ~ :I:,i. - ~1 ~ i, '1" i 1~ i {11 i~' 1 i ~ I II ~ I I I' n i i~~i .1 i i iii li I I 1`i ~ I ~ ~ i~~~.i p,~ _ ~ i ~ i,1{ill~ll a 1111i1.~lui~ ~I;il! ,L ~ IIt~illLll~,1~~~,1i1l~IIliluu .i6 liillllllili~ u~l,~l• .!I II ill 111111 12TH LEVEL I ~ ~I~a. .I ~,L, ~ , ~I i. u r a o ~ ~ ~ Ill . ~i ~ ~ I I i1 I i',il!lill!111i!Illiliillill it Il!i' i11111111i1111iIN':I III{Illllll.lliill i 11lIIILI1111i!Ill!'ll!iil!~ !~U,!'ilgnl~ ~i1lIJlllllLlil~l~:l i~lllliualillu~,~i!I~. 111111~IIl+I :I:Nf~JaNllliNtli1i11 ___________11THLEVEL ~ ! 1 4 ORNAMENTAL RAILING ~ I I~ ! ~ Il; ! 'n11 !'Il 1111 II11.1' II'I I 11111' 'I 11!1!"11 1':'ly:;;j I;'ir iI111L!Illiu dill '.I , IJnliilli' ~ I'i!1 ,I~:I,Ii1.II;.:J,1:116:I,IJaila .~:Il,.i JLilil ;.:,,.lilli..,l~:l p1. I i. IjPil il, 11 1 i i l Iii ' L` ~iilili i ;Ijliil i'~n 1 I 1 i{+~, ! ~ I i ' i+l+~~ ~I ~l~"1: _ ©Copydght • Graham Design Associates, P ,!;Ili„ill ~I~,~h~ll,.I :IIJi~,. $~.,I(1113i,IIN~~.IIIL= ~,1,~:.1111~1.~ : ,1,ni~ll~i{J:i~l,~lh~, , hil1~111:.;1i~..ll~lull.h. ~,r~,, l~ 107H LEVEL. - All right reserved. This material is the exclusive properly ALUMINUM WINDOW ~ of Graham Design Assodates, P.A.. r O Reproduction in whole or in parts is I II! i,: i 1 11,1111 Ili:lll, I, : 1, it : III I I ! 111111 I I III ' .~1 i~ Il 4Ni ~ ' _ - '_'i iii+' I ~i~ 'a' I t ' , ii' i "I IIII I ~ - strlcllyprohihitedwithoutthepriarwritten {I,{,iIJ{Ili jf;ll,i,{}, l;, ~ 11{1111111: I'lll :Its, Ih IIII lur~lll I,!!li~llillll.li iiill~. (i~il !IIIII: !li ~,~Ili Iii ))~;,~~s), 9TH LEVEL permissionofGmhamOesignAssociaies, 1'!11111,11 IILI ~:IiJli,,l, l„i:!:l.a 11,11,11:1 i1,,IIIVI ~ .I..II;.; ~I, IJI,., - - P.A. and any such reproduction may subjectyou to civa andla criminal liability CORNICE underTille 17 ofthe United States Cade. r O_ FABRIC AWNINGS Illllllli1i1111111I:; 11111 1111111.11111%Ill11i11111ilillllilllll IIII1~1!lillllllillf 1lililll,lll IIIIIIN,III 1111111111 lillllil!11r Illlli;il Ill I IIII±Ih "I;IH111L'ILIIIIIIIIiIi!!I!lIII1lIIIIIH!U~' Ill~flll .l!Illllilill!!lllllll 8TH LEVEL fi'ARAPET WALL m r m o 1 m ! Ilillli1ii1111i `IIillllll111111111,Ili1111illllilllllllllll'31111Iiii1i;11i1111~11111 ~ '!I'i i~' 1111 ' II"' I' ~ i I i:~: ~ i I'l; ~1!'u I~IIi' 11 1i ~I'll'lil''i'r'1 ITN h,S11S n ! i:illu11111 I !~~iai~l~lii.1~~~~ IIC 111,.111 i,1111.i~11i~1~. ~iiull~li;lulil,illl~ll,l~l~ll{~ 111h1~~ulu ;li~,,ni;ii~,~l 1il~llil~laa .1),,~,:„~ 1TH LEVEL. TTH LEVEL W i.l : :11 i II ,I II1II,lill111 ~ II: III II m r 0 GTH LEVEL ~ (~((i Lillll 11'1;11 I' ! i':I I III~1111!Ij1!1111 iIL!I' 11111!1 111!!1111111 ~il1'llNill!~~~~,l;!lilLIHIIII'I1illll:lli, ~llllli I!1 111111 I'1 I1~ iNl .l':,ii'i~' Illihi!1,1?11'Iliilf!I!~ lliili!II!lNN ilililli~~ Ili;l!il?lilt!M'1',Ilillil!'lll'lillllli;lll. Ill!illll+111~11!!N{lilllllil i~~.~1~r1 6TH LEVEL 81'-4' 81'-4" ao r O_ ~ I 1'.I, , ! ' i ~ 1 ! ,1 I 1 u : I !I :i I it ' I!I'I'I 1'1111'1,'' 1111 I Il 11'11 'lll h!I,'I, I r I!~liil~l!ll 1!illl!lliil,l!lil,!,'~~ IIlI!!lliiNili'aillw ~!lillllli;{I;I!li!1i1liiillRilllliilll i,~iIl111lilili~illil~iiiil! ),i1i1)%~?. _ 3THLEVEL u? r 5TH LEVEL ~ II!!:Il.l;ii,ilfll{lil III {III+111111 ;,111, Ifl1' Illlulh f1, d11,11~.1 1I{I 1:,~,! LJ~~.~L'111,'.,1~l.~:,11.1 L.,I:,1,,11111,16 d1 jrll;~ .;11 11111dill!IIIIlilll;ilil1il111hll.Illliliillilliil,!Iliiil(iL'~lilipillllllll= TOP Of GARAGE ~ Q n , , ~ ~ I• ui• 1" l~~I~VU;u4l. .,~il,.l, ~ 11~,• i I, I~ ; 1!!I;,I~ii HST, - i1lilllilllll= !!Ihlli!+lillil!!I LIU ~ 1.i( Ilillliili!lill!IIh ~:~!lliulhlllllll~.Ii~u1u;'nlllll~lnl!dli! ~~Illl~ll;illllll?I!~;,~~I~u; 1n„i)),) 4TH LEVEL _Q 4TH LEVEL I1111.:,1I,I...i. - -so;-o" ~ (K - ~ 0 o u- 3RD LEVEL ~sr~ytay~ 1, i .1!11111111 ii; Nil!ilili III LI;iL111illll!ill lilil1i111iilih!11Ili I L1 III!IIIINII • Illillliitll '!Ililllh'l~ llllllil~ l,l!!illi!iliililJi!Ill's-~L~.IIII il!lil~ iiiiliililli!iiiiiliilll;llii~. illllll] I' !IIII. illli,liial! 7;~1) _ 3RD I~VEL nom W b H 'm Q m o ~ ~ Ilill~ 1! i' ~ 111,1 'i I'i'I~ Ili 1i' I' II'~'II ii i' 1i{{III,!I,IIIIIN'li!I'lllil!Ill.lil ll!:I~'~ 111111.11 I iii {1{lllilfliil! 1ua~~),~,~ 2ND LEVEL ~~N ~ ~ b ~ il,!I 111111 i..llll I~I•. I~~li i. ..IIII. .i _ b ~ Q 2ND LEVEL ~ lll!il!Illlillll':11 !Illlilli''111N111!11 I1111111I~.i ,i 111111iN111,i1f1 i111111j1!Illl 11:1 -`o FORTE-000HE j z li I - ~ _ ao 0 ~ ~ _ , pEANNlNG 8 DEVEI.OP4~lc.~lT SVCS ~ - -I - CIiY OF CtEARVUATER ~ 30=0° GARAGE ENTRANCE ~ GARAGE ENTRRNCE sa'_a' ~IIII !11111'IlllifliillHl!Illlllill!1i111111111i1 II{ Iii 11i:'111111111N111 ••~rDEVEr li,i I'11N ~I lii!'il !~i;li ,IN~III~ 8i''il II!!i Ill!II'Ihll~~ 'Ili!! !i!!!! Illi, ~ i!11i11!lIIINII'!Jlli!~ till I!lilii li!IIi i!!Ill?!il >'i5;1,1,~?~~~ _-•_-~-•-_~-_•-_~_-'-15TCEVEI ~ ° ,.lip II _ w 28'-D' N ~ L ~ Ga `I' 28'-0 - r z M MFIFI IV . Q VILLA w _ -T ORIGINAL > 1r-o 4 b U ~ N N 0 z ISLAND VIEW - NORTH ELI Fl ELEVATION ~ z w ul 0 SCALE: 1/I4"=1'-0" _N w 0 u Ix AC o Q Z = w a I- 1L U N 4 0 to z m A q 0 9 m u i c THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA 0000152 tl N L tl EE 0 Q a 05-14 7 DATE 0 0 N L/9/05 d LR DRAWN c 0 U La A16 0 MAW 7 yl 0 R V n CHECKED °D D5 U V U TILE ROOF JOF ELEVATOR LOBBY ' ARBOR I SOR ~ ROOF LINE____ DECO COLUMNS 'INS 2AIL O~lAMENTAL RAI i ELEvATORLOBBY COMMON ELECT ~ I ~ _ _ 3rd. F 'OOR I ELEVAtOR LOBBY COI'1MON ELECt ~ ~ 0 a I r ~ 2nd FLd~OR U 0 LL p u~i LEVATO ~ ~ ~ O ~ ELEVATOR LOBBY STAfRS GOMMOhI ELECt ? ~ ~ a ~x - z ~ - LOOK - ~ U ~ W ~ M X Q I I ~ ~ Y ~j o i ~ fL` ~ S i 'E' - ~iTI~,~~1~G S~C~CIOl~ ~ ~ ~ scntE: iia^ = r-on ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ Q N TILE ROOF i, O ~WTAai~r.PA Thb mcM W b Eie mtlab+pcpmly AOraM1un Ded~lawWM.PA pk~Jpw~wtM~ AR~OR ~ ~ ROOF ~OOFL A and eM auN regoducmn ~Y RD~F LANE _ .ubpanw~b~.~aWm~mimh~ udu11Mi7gMU4hadSWnCOds. ROOF LINE DECO COL MNS - PARAPET WALL C BARREL TILE ROOF ORNAMENTAL R41L O DECK ESIDENTIA ALUMINUM WINDOIUS O~IAMETAL RESIDENTIAL - ~ WITH FABRIC RAIL - 3rd. FL 3rd. FLOOR 3rd. FLOOR AlL9~lINCxB F ?0' - _ - _ - - - 0 ~ _ROOF_LINE - - ORNAMENTAL ORNAMENTAL PLANTER ~ ~ DECK ~ESIDENTIA 0 RAIL _ O 3rd_FLOOR o W u1O RESfDENTIAL ~ O ~ ~ M 2nd FLOOR - ~ r ~ PREGAS7 BALU~TER 2nd FL Z 2nd_FLOOR_____ _ O PRIVACY WALL (aND _2nd_ FLOOR - _ ~ ~ o ~ 0 FENCE - - o LL StU~~o 0 0 R I G I f~l~ ~ e ~ LL ~ W w Z ~ KEYSTONE ;n ` Z 0 ~ DECK RESIDENTIAL in AND BAND FIRST FLOOR ~ ~ W ~ RETAIL Z ORNAMENTAL PLANTER ~ j~ a STOREFRONT BARREL TILE ROOF F"~ ~ Z U I FIRST F FIRST FLOOR _ WINDOUJS ~ ~f] ~j W W PIRS7 FLOOR r ~ v u u =DEVELOPMiNT U ~e Z GEORGIA B~JILDA1~1~T ~jL~jVL"~TIOl~ PLANNING VCS Cm'OFCLEARU UA7ER Q V- BUILDING SECTION 'D'- BUILDING SECTION SCALE: i/sn m le_0n sAtu.E: 1/8n ° P-W° SCALE: 1/16"= 1',A" u w O Ind z TYP. EMBELLISHMENT HT. B ORNAMENTAL r7 ° N ORNAMENTAL BARREL TILE ROOF BRACKETS F"i ~ BRACKETS ~ BARREL TILE ROOF _ BARREL TILE ROOF /-~~PARAPET WALL PARAPET WALL o 11 PARAPET WALL PARAPET WALL o _ CORNICE ALUMINUM WINDOWS CORNICE ALUMINUM WINDOWS ALUMINUM WINDOWS CORNICE ALUMINUM WINDOWS nmmTm ~ARREL TILE WITH FABRIC DECO COLUMNS WITH FABRIG AWNINGS ARBOR WITH FABRIC AWNINGS ARBOR COLUMNS AII~`ABRIC BAE ROOF ~wp ~ a o ~ ROB AWNINGS ARBOR ~ W ORNAMENTAL RAIL ~ i li:::::: I - OR a ~ ROOF LINE a~_ 6 ~0?~ ORNAMENTAL- Z p ORNAMENTAL-- - RAIL ~ RAIL 3rd. FLOOR 3rd. FLOOR ORNAMENTAL r-rlln ORNAMENTAL p ~ PLANTER Inmounmi IL m n a Olin 2nd FLOOR o O ago MnL 9 a 2nd FLOOR O O D p o o o ift THOMAS J. GRAHAM rA rn LICENSE NO. FIF FIRST FLOO AA R a Cooo'152 FIRST FLOOR 4-4 0 0 TTT, . . u - I G SCORED STUCCO BARREL TILE RjOOF 1, i B RF2EL TILE ROOF SCORED STUCCO FABRIC AWNIN.s \-SCORED STUCCO gGORED. STUCCO ALUMINUM WINDOWS SCORED S?UGC SCORED STUGGO FABRIC AWNING ALUMINUM WINDOWS OIRNAMENTAL RAIL AL PRIVACY WALLS ORNAMENTAL FAIL I O S- I 6 STOREFRONT ~IN OU15 ALUMINUM rINDOW& SEE COLORED PLANS ANp ELEVATIONS R RESIDENTIAL PRIV ' RETAIL STAIRS RESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS RE5I1DENTIAL RETAIL STAIR RETAIL DATE Ile ~iauos 3-7 ELEVATION A18 DRAWN o D OSCEOLL', ~ BUILDING ELE SCALE: 1/16"= ll-(r CHECKED 0 f - _ . - / Y P U ~ m N Z O S w a 0 I z i p u~i ~ .rin mM ~ rr rX N ~ ,,nn VJ • ~ CD 0' o W o z~ ® ® _ _ _ _ _ TOP Of ROOF _ ~ v 178'-8" o i ~ u. o t _ a i p ~I t 8 F _P = I ~ ~ i ~ N ~ ~ ~I ~ - u I r PENTHOUSE 11.. 3 ' ~ O 188'x" ~i oo ~ - li i ! ~ p I ~ ~ I o N ~ i. 13TH LEVEL ~ , ( _ U ~ s 00 ~ ~ I ~i n ~n~ ~ r s i~i ~ ~ o v I a I 12TH LEVEL - I "i ~ F, - V a ti I. i ~ i -cl ~ r ~ I I ~ i ( o ~ i - ' I i ~ ~ } IITH LEVEL ~ - ~ u? ~ I ~ ~ ~`~i ! I ~ ~I s I. ~ ~ o ~ ~il:;: ~ IOTH LEVEL ~Co ' ht-Greham0 ' nAssociates,P PYn9 ~9 ~h~>t~ ~Il 6 An rights reserved. - This material is the exclusive property °i a I °p of Graham Design Associates, P.A.. I I O Reproduct'ron in whole or in parts is - strichy prohibited without the priorwritten I( ( l i ( i l - ; _ - - _ 9TH LEVEL_ _ permission of Graham Design Associates, ' ~ ' - P.A. and any such reproduction may subject you to civil anNoraiminal Lability e co under Title 17 of the United States Cotle. ni ~ a 9 p 1' ~ ' J._Jni I n i @ i~ c O I~ ~ e r r ' - 8TH LEVEL ir_1, I ~ ~i l ~ l ~ _ _ C I ~ I, m ~ ~l ~ o n ~ n r(~ I ~ I ~'I. l ' l s I i I I 1TH LEYEL ` ' - l - ~ I - ~ q q m l I r l ~ n ~ I ~n I tl ( ~ o ll u C ~ P 1 R I I B i B _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~I _ _ - _ ~ - 1 ~ ( `I~ { i bTH LEVEL-_ 1 I I 81 ~ r- t ~ o~ r n i P ~ I i n ~ i ~ ~ b I I, I I I _ ~ r ~ ~ r i I' ( ~ 5TH LEVEL ~ ~ i ( i r i I ~ ~ ' ( I I - I~ o ~ _ ~ V TOP OF GARAGE - Q ~I I( ~ - ~ ------4TH.LEVEL__ ~ Q 80'-0" l! ~ ~ I, ~ 0 f ~~~mi~~m ,o~ n,( ~ I ~ _ - q - _ _ _ _3RD LEVEL_ - ~ - - ~ P°a I ~ n r ~ Q In~ ~n1 II I I~ II o ~ - - - - !!nn ~ L VI I I I I --•-•---2ND 1EVE b Q ~ lll i - d ~ Imo- ~ _ ~ ~ U i I TRA E f I 30'-0" _GARAGE EN NC o - - - - ~nivP N n LO I OSCEOLA PROPERTY o AVENUE LINE ' m POOL DECK O ~ I 25'-0' 20'-0". . . . I N u E 3 u Q VILLA 18'-0"_ z t c :::t:::::• o T2-o w b U I N I ~ JUN 09 2005 z ~ o OW PLAWN lv0- 3 DI:VELOFI:9E±~T SUCS > z !i1 0 Cr-rv Of tir4PWTER w N U CID W Q ~ Q / < t- _ z w y H ~ Z: U !1 9 ISLAND VIEW - BU le BUILDING SECTION t'11 < > 1- SCALE: _j ac a 0 ~ ~ b z n w a > m o` S J I UI m u F 0 J v = THOMAS J. GRAHAM LICENSE NO. AA C000152 u e 'v 0 Q 00, a E DATE 0 o ~ L/9/05 4 J v! DRANK 0 m 0 Ln A19 0 MAW 7 0 tt CHECKED 4 V m DS N v L V J V LEGAL DESCRIPTION . A LEGAL: PARCEL 1: 300-410 OSCEOLA AVENUE LOTS 1 THROUGH 7 AND THE 10 FOOT ALLEY LYING WEST OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 3 OF A.S. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 64, PUBLIC INDEX RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COVER SHEET 1 BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7 OF SAID A.D &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION: THENCE N.88'58'21"E, ALONG THE 50UTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF GEORGIA STREET ® a v (A 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY), A DISTANCE OF 211.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (A 55 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE SOUTH, ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 337.16 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE N89 58 02 W., A DISTANCE OF 211.11 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE (A 40 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY); THENCE N00'06'14"W., ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY GENERAL NOTES 2 LINE OF LOT 4 THROUGH 7 OF SAID A.B. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 333.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 2: SON AVENUE DEMOLITION PLAN 3 LOTS A AND B OF BERGENS REPEAT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 26, PAGE 41, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER WITH THE EAST 1/3 OF LOT 2, AND THE WEST 1/3 OF LOT 3 OF JONES OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, AS RECORDED IN PLAT H1, PAGE 13, PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART, ALSO TOGETHER WITH A VACATED ALLEY AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY ALL LUNG IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ~ ,I DA 33755 SITE PLAN 4 BEGIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT B OF SAID BERGENS REPEAT; THENCE SOUTH, ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE (A GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 5 55 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY) AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS A AND B OF SAID BERGENS REPEAT; A DISTANCE OF 179.99 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JONES STREET; THENCE N89'49'45"W, ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID JONES STREET AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT A AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE EAST 1 3 OF LOT 2 AND THE WEST 1/3 OF LOT 3 OF SAID JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, A DISTANCE OF 186.65 FEET; / THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID EAST 1/3 OF LOT 2, JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, A DISTANCE OF 179.99 UTILITY PLAN 6 FEET; THENCE S89'49'47"E, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH, A DISTANCE OF 12,47 FEET; THENCE 589'49'47"E, A DISTANCE OF 161.65 FEET TO THE WESTERLY AIO RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH, A DISTANCE OF 12.26 FEET TO THE POINT OF GENERAL DETAILS 7 BEGINNING. AND UTILITY DETAILS 8 PARCEL #1 301 OSCEOLA AVENUE, 400 & 410 JONES STREET . LIFT STATION DETAIL 9 THE WEST 2 3 OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSONS ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK / 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART OF, LESS THE NORTHWEST CORNER AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LANDSCAPE PLAN 10-11 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, OF SAID JONES SUBDIVISION FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE N.00'23'00"W., ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID ~ PARCEL 1: 09-29-15-14310-000-0080 LOT 2, 169.80 FEET, THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE, (SAID CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET; A TANGENT OF 8,07 FEET; A CHORD OF 15.55 FEET; A 0-0080 CHORD BEARING N.49'42'46"E), A DISTANCE OF 15.96 FEET; THENCE N.89'41'OS"E., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, 41.77 FEET; THENCE S.00'23'00"E., 180.00 FEET; 404 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE THENCE S.894106 W., 53.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AVENUE LANDSCAPE DETAILS 12 CLEARWATER FL PARCEL~2 ~ • "INVESTIGATE BEFORE YOU EXCAVATE" THE SOUTH 76 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT PARCEL 2. 09'29'15-14310'000-0100 0-0100 BOOK 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART, TOGETHER WITH THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND LYING BETWEEN THE WEST LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND AND THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE, LYING AND BEING IN PINELLAS COUNTY, 400 N, OSCEOLA AVENUE FLORIDA. EVEN U E ~l~~ ~~FD CLEARWATER FL ~a~E # ~~3 PARCEL#3 ~ 4 5 's PARCEL 3: 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OF THE JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOL ON ~0-0400 ~ SA~yC DA E ~°'o2'b5 ~i~ - ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR, ACCORDING TO THE CORRECTED MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 13, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FLORIDA OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART; RUN THENCE N00'23'00"W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 157 FEET FORA 314 N, OSCEOLA AVENUE H , POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S.79'24'06"W., 80.28 FEET; THENCE S.00'44'00"W., 12.21 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 79.25 FEET, MORE AVENUE CpBDATE a~ 14° CALL SUNSHINE ®1-BOO-432-4770 SIGNt~TI~RE i OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE GF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 27 FEET MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLEARWATER FL FL. STAME 553,851 (1979) RE4UIRES A ®I~TE ~ ~ DAYSC OTICEABEFORE YOU EXCAVATE, S~ ~ Z PARCEL 4: 09-29-15-00000-430-0600 ~0-0600 AND NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS DRESS VICINITY MAP 302-308 OSCEOLA AVENUE CLEARWATER FL FROM THE SOUTHWEST (SW) CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER (SE 1/4) OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST; RUN WEST 398.68 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 38 MINUTES EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE 545.68 FEET TO PARCEL 5; 09-29-15-00000-430-0500 ~0-0500 ~ ~ N~ ~a- ti THE NORTH LINE OF AN ALLEY AS SHOWN IN JONES SUBDIVISION TO THE TOWN OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, THENCE EAST 58.0 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH ~ ~ ~ , B ~e WM10X ~ ~ NISWI va®d 83.16 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE WEST 250.55 FEET MORE OF LESS TO THE WATERS OF CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE SOUTH 22 1/2 DEGREES WEST 90.01 FEET MORE OR 312 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE LESS TO A POINT 285 FEET WEST OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST 285.0 FEET TO POINT BEGINNING. 'TOGETHER WITH ALL SUBMERGED LAND A RIPARIAN RIGHTS EVE N U E a . ~T I ~ ~ ~,~a, ~~1~ , APPURTENANT TO SAID TRACT DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: - CLEARWATER FL 110FXIS'WAVRI,~ I ~,I.,g~ I - OLIF ~,pll TAY ~ • dM TRACT 23, FROM AN INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF JONES STREET.,AND. THE WEST LINE ~iF OSCEOLA AVENUE OF JONES SUBDIVISION IN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA; RUN 1iI ~Nw ~w ~ NORTH ALONG WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE 190 FEET; THENCE_WEST"21:9 FEET TO AVERAGE HIGH WATER L!wr OF CLEARWATER BAY TO POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE PARCEL 6. 09-29-15-53370-000'0010 _ ~0-0010 - ~ - 725 FEET TO CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE 725. FEET TO CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG EAST SIDE OF CHANNEL A DISTANCE OF 83.17 FEET DUE NORTH; THENCE EAST 725 FEET TO AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE IN A SOUTHWESTERLY COURSE ALONG THE AVERAGE HIGH NO PHYSICAL ADDRE SS WATER LINE TO POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN ORDER FOR TAKING FILES ••.:~JUARY 13, 1961, IN O.R. BOOK 1083, PAGE 97, PUBLIC DRESS RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CLEARWATER FL . ~ I ~ 6FNiN0lEII LOTS A AND B OF CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN P! BOUK 35, PAGE 76, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS PMCO COUNTY FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH ALL SUBMERGED LANDS, BAY BOTTOMS AND RIPARIAN RIGHTS THEREUNTO APNr TAINING OR IN ANYWISE BELONGING, MORE PARTICULARLY PARCEL 7. 09'29-15-53370'000-0020 , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ~0-0020 x~ ° ~i NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS DRESS ~ FlNFlN9 : , BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76, PUBL!C RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND RUN PROJECT ~ ~~~W THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 06'15" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION G x.48 FEET TO THE. 50UTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH CLEARWATER FL 89 DEGREES 54'00" WEST, 630.0 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE EASTERLY ~ VICINITY Nx~ _ ~N, ~ ~ O ~ xox.va Y, 4~ BOUNDARY OF SAID CHANNEL, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID COLV15 C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION; THENCE EASTERLY, PARC?EL 8; 09-29-15-07940-000-0021 ~0-0021 of I _ f, - N,~ ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE 637.0 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT TO THE WEST COAST INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT ON THAT PART LYING WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE .CENTERLINE OF THE WEST COAST INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY cxwioLL~l .uaa CA L- CONTAINING 0.28 ACRE MORE OR LESS. 300 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE NA , , AVENUE I LH N.I.if PNM9EVH THAT PART OF A CERTAIN TEN 10) FEET OF UNNAMED ALLEY EXTENDING WEST TO THE WATERS OF CLEARWA cis riARBOR FROM THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY OF OSCEOLA CLEARWATER FL c , AVENUE AND LYING SOUTH OF THE FREILER PROPERTY AND LYING NORTH OF LOT A OF CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76, PUBLIC N.T.S. RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID ALLEY HAVING BEEN VACATED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING THE SAME PROPERTY AS PARCEL 9. 09-29-15-44352-002-0010 ~2-0010 - ~ SHOWN ON QUIT CLAIM DEED FROM A.K. FREILER AND SARAH RAY FREILER, HIS WIFE, IN O.R. 58y, PAGE 289, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. NO PHYSICALADDRE SS A PARCEL OF SUBMERGED LAND IN CLEARWATER HARBOR IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED DRESS NRiREI NME AS FOLLOWS: CLEARWATER FL BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT A OF THE CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, ~ FLORIDA, SAID POINT BEING ON THE AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER HARBOR, SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING 555.97 FEET NORTH AND 1949.66 FEET WEST OF PARCEL 10.09-29-15-44352-002'0012 THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9, FROM AFORESAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN THENCE N89 DEGREES 24'16" WEST, 282.41 FEET TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ~2-0012 BULKHEAD LINE; THENCE RUN N07 DEGREES 28'50" EAST,10:07 FEET ALONG SAID BULKHEAD LINE; RUN THENCE S89 DEGREES 24'16" EAST, 281.21 FEET TO THE AVERAGE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS DRESS HIGH WATER LINE OF CLEARWATER HARBOR; RUN THENCE SOD DEGREES 38'00" WEST 10.00 FEET ALONG SAID AVERAGE HIGH WATER LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLEARWATER FL AND ~ PAR~?EL 11;09-29-15-44352-002-0020 2-0020 500 N. FT. HARRISON AVENUE ' A 00 5 AGE 77 ACCORDING TO THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA. NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS LOTS 1 AND 2 HARRINGTON S SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PL T B K , P , DRESS SECT. 9, TWN. 29 S., RNG.15 E. PARCEL A CLEARWATER FL LOTS 8, 9, 1D, 11 8c ALL OF GEORGIA STREET LYING NORTH OF SAID LOT 8, A.B. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 64 OF THE PUBLIC ~ ' - _ LOCATION MAP . RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 12: 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 ~~I •f~,~lr ~n 0-0300 ~ . ~ ~w~ar~t~ T TOGETHER WITH: 309 OSCEOLA AVENUE l at+ ~y ~ ENUE ~ i ~ ~ PARCEL B BEGINNING WHERE THE WEST LINE OF NORTH OSCEOLA STREET, IN CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, OR THE WEST LINE OF SAID STREET EXTENDED NORTH AS SAID NORTH OSCEOLA CLEARWATER FL P STREET EXISTED ON OCTOBER 8, 1894, INTERSECTS THE SOUTH LINE OF A THREE ACRE TRACT OF LAND FORMERLY OWNED BY MARY C, NICHOLSON, WHICH SAID TRACT IS ~ DESCRIBED AS (BEGINNING 17.85 CHAINS WEST AND 8.28 CHAINS NORTH OF THE S.E. CORNER OF SEC. 9, TVJP: 29 S„ RANGE 15 E, THENCE NORTH 2.52 CHAINS TO A PARCEL 13.09'29'1 5-1 431 0-000-001 0 STAKE, THENCE RUN WEST 11.40 CHAINS TO A STAKE, AT LOW WATER MARK ON CLEARWATER BAY, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE MEANDERINGS OF SAID BAY 2.75 CHAINS ~0-0010 ~ ~ { MORE OR LESS TO A POINT DUE WEST OF THE STARTING; THENCE EAST 12.40 CHAINS MORE OR LESS TO A POINT OF BEGINNING; 410 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE ~ ~ gVENUE ^ CONTAINING 3 ACRES MORE OR LESS; THENCE RUN EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NICHOLSON TRACT 58 FT. FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 84 FT., THENCE EAST 70 FT., THENCE SOUTH 84 FT., THENCE EAST 70 FT., THENCE SOUTH 84 FT., THENCE WEST 70 FT. TO POINT OF BEGINNING, IT BEING THE INTENTION HEREBY CLEARWATER FL rM~~~~~~'I~,~~ ~ I f_ ~"u~~ilM'r!A,fiCl~9f? ' TO CONVEY THE LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY J.E. ELDRIDGE TO JAMES E. BEARING AND ROSE B. SCARLING BY DEED DATED APRIL 10, 1922, FILED SAME DATE, AND ~ RECORDED IN DEED RECORD 116, PAGE 67, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ' '•~r ~ ~ f ~ ~ JUN 09 2005 s , ~ Ise ~ i' ~ • i ~ i PARCEL C ~ ~ ALSO, BEGIN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND HERETOFORE DESCRIBED AND HEREBY CONVEYED, RUN THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERN ' Y. ~~~r~ a 7 ~ , ~ t~ ~ I I ~ ~~u r~~. Pt~~NiN~ ~ acv -~,oF~ti+~ ~~au s ~"~~~~~~E~kr~~ ~ ~_~~~I •,Rt ~ ~ ~Cmr4F~ClE:ar~+v~~~M BOUNDARY OF SAID ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT 37 FEET 6 INCHES FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE CONTINUE ALONG SAID SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID ABOVE ' DESCRIBED TRACT WESTERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT, THENCE SOUTHE 7 FEET, 1HENCE EASTERLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE TO POINT OF BEGINNING, BEING A I TRIANGULAR PIECE OF LAND, IT BEING THE INTENTION BY THIS DESCRIPTION TO CONVEY THAT CERTAIN SMALL TRIANGULAR PARCEL OF LAND HERETOFORE CONVEYED BY THE r O-- ~ } CITY OF CLEARWATER TO JAMES B: SCARING BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 13, 1922, FILED DECEMBER 14, 1922, RECORDED IN DEED RECORD 133, PAGE 483, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~t7~~ A . ~ ~ ~?+~t~~°° _ _ P R OJ ECT TOGETHER WITH: ~ PARCEL D C1VIL~NGIN~~.RING IANDSCAPEARC>11TECT R U ~ ~P LO CAT I 0 N TECTURE PLANNING ,n~tl ~ ' ~ ~ BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, COUNTY OF PINELLAS, STATE OF FLORIDA, WHERE THE WEST LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE INTERSECTS THE SOUTH LINE OF GEORGIA STREET; RUN THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE 200 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT ELEVEN 11 , OF .701 FMERPRISE EZOr1L7 L'. SUITE 404 O , CA1ES SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS SAME APPEARS OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE 49 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WHAT SAFCTY HARQOR~FLORIDA 34695 IS KNOWN AS THE OLD JOHN E. LAMBETH PROPERTY, THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SAID LAMBETH LINE TO THE HIGH WATER MARK ON CLEARWATER BAY, THENCE A NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID HIGH WATER MARK TO SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN 11 OF SAID CATES' SUBDIVISION, O PHONF: 727.793.9888 _ , THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, drawing 111t1e FAX: 727.793.9855 TOGETHER WITH: COVER F~IAI[,. KEFFf 1 ~,;KFFFHZAY~C.COM PARCEL E THOSE SUBMERGED LANDS DESCRIBED IN OR BOOKS 3515, PAGE 221, OR 3557, PAGE 559 AND OR 1324, NOTE SHEET PAGE 520 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST Agency App. / Permit No. Date ISM Date Issued / Date Expires EDITIONS OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, KZA Pro} No,; 324-03 SWFWMD ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS AND CITY OF Owner Prof Na; NA FDOT CLEARWATER CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. Scale SEE SHEETS CITY OF CLEARWATER FLD2005-04034 Sheet No. 1 of 12 U GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES CLEARING AND SITE PREPARATION NOTES WATER SYSTEM NOT 'STEM NOTES DRAINAGE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION NOTES ~ BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SANITARY SEWERS 1. STANDARD INDEXES REFER TO THE LATEST EDITION OF FDOT "ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC ~ ~ - 1, PRIOR TO ANY SITE CLEARING, ALL TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN ON THE CONSTRUCTION 1, A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18 INCHES SHALL BE MAINTAINEI 1. ALL ELEVATIONS REFER TO THE NAVD (1988). ~ AND. WATER MAINS. IF CLEARANCE CANNOT BE ACHIEVED E PLANS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY S 3E ACHIEVED BY ADJUSTING WATER MAINS DESIGN STANDARDS". ~ U LEVATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, AND TREE ORDINANCE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN THESE TREES THE SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DUCTILE 2. LOCATIONS, E , D OF DUCTILE IRON CLASS 54 A MINIMUM ~ A URES ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE IN GOOD CONDITION. NO TREES SHOWN TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT WRITTEN OF 10 FEET ON BOTH SIDES OF THE CONFLICT POINT. AS OTHER FE T CT POINT. AS AN ALTERNATIVE THE 2, ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE CLASS III (ASTM C-76) WITH I- . CO TRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. ONLY "GRADING BY HAND" IS PERMITTED WITHIN THE CANOPY SANITARY SEWER MAY BE PLACED IN A SLEEVE OR ENCASE TIME OF PREPARATION OF THESE PLANS. THE N REQUIRED 10 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE CONFLICT POINT ~E OR ENCASED IN CONCRETE FOR THE RUBBER GASKET JOINTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS, ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES f ` U ONFLICT POINT. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FDOT ROADWAY AND TRAFFIC DESIGN STANDARDS UNLESS ~J ELEVATIONS, AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, STRUCTURES AND OTHER LINE OF TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN, OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. a FEATURES AFFECTING THIS WORK PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO PREPARE THE SITE PRIOR TO BEGINNING ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION 2. A HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET SHALL BE MAINTAINI _ BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER MAINS E CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK PLANS FOR CONFLICTS AND DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SOILS TESTING REPORT. COPIES OF THE SOILS REPORT ARE AND SANITARY SEWER. 3, TH 3. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND TO THE CENTER OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURES " J Q CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER OF ANY AVAILABLE THROUGH THE OWNER OR THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. QUESTIONS 3, ALL WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 30 INCHES A 30 INCHES AND A MAXIMUM OF WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MITERED END AND FLARED END SECTIONS WHICH ARE ~ u INCLUDED IN LENGTHS, ~ ~ CONFLICT BEFORE PERFORMING ANY WORK IN THE AFFECTED AREA, REGARDING SITE PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SOILS REPORT ARE TO 42" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. Q' BE DIRECTED TO THE SOILS TESTING COMPANY. ITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND 4. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE GRATES AND COVERS WITHIN TRAFFIC AREAS SHALL BE ~J z ACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN AREAS OF BURIED UTILITIES AND 4. ALL WATER SYSTEM WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL REL 4. THE CONTR ROVIDE AT LEAST 48 HOURS NOTICE TO THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES IN 3, CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ONLY THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SITE NECESSARY SPECIFICATIONS, SHALL P TRAFFIC RATED FOR H-20 LOADINGS, ORDER TO PERMIT MARKING THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IN FOR CONSTRUCTION. DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED, MULCHED, OR PLANTED WITH LJ ANITARY SEWER TO BE RESOLVED BY 5, CONTRACTOR TO SOD THE DETENTION POND AS INDICATED ON PLANS WITHIN ONE WEEK ~ ~ ~ 0 CONSTRUCTION BY CALLING FLORIDA SUNSHINE STATE ONE CALL CENTER OTHER APPROVED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION. 5. CONFLICTS BETWEEN WATER AND STORM OR SANITARY SEWEI ADVANCE F ADJUSTING THE WATER LINES AS NECESSARY. ~ i~ ~ FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION OF THE POND, . OF FLORIDA, INC. AT 1-800-432-4770, 4. THE TOP 4" TO 6" OF GROUND REMOVED DURING CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHALL BE z Li 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES, STOCKPILED AT A SITE DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER TO BE USED FOR LANDSCAPING 6. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TEMPORARY BLOW-OFFS AT THE EI FFS AT THE END OF WATER SERVICE 6. ALL STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES DEEPER THAN TEN (10) FEET TO HAVE LADDER BARS, ~ ~ G a„~,~ ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND, THAT MAY OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE WORK PERFORMED PURPOSES, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. LATERALS TO ASSURE ADEQUATE FLUSHING AND DISINFECTIC JD DISINFECTION, ~ ~ ~ BY THE CONTRACTOR. 7, CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE NECESSARY DEWATERING PERMITS FROM Z-,~ G ~ ~ ALL FITTINGS AND HYDRANTS AS SHOWN ON THE LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r:~ ~ 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF- 7. RESTRAINING JOINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL FITTINGS A 6. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MUST BE IN PLACE AND TESTED OR INSPECTED PRIOR TO SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. DETAILS. ROADWAY BASE AND SURFACE CONSTRUCTION. Z d ~ u 8, PROTECTION OF EXISTING STORM SEWERS SYSTEMS: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS PRIOR TO REMOVING 8. MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR WATER DISTRII WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SHALL BE DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STORM SEWER INLETS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT u ~ = CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE PERMIT AND ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY COT 7. IT IS THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, LATEST REVISION THER o~ Y AGENCY CODES, PLANS, AND SHALL BE PROTECTED BY SEDIMENT TRAPS SUCH AS SECURED HAY BALES, SOD, STONE, l ~ REVISION THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENTAL ETC., WHICH SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND MODIFIED AS REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION U ' J INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS OF THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES. THE )NSTRUCTION OF ALL POTABLE WATER PROGRESS, SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, AND 7. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY ALL UTILITY. COMPANIES TO SPECIFICATIONS THERETO. APPROVAL AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR S ECTIONS ACCORDING TO AGENCY INSTRUCTION. DISCONNECT OR REMOVE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO REMOVING OR DEMOLISHING ANY SERVICE MAIN EXTENSIONS AND CONNECTIONS MUST BE CO MUST BE COORDINATED THROUGH THE SCHEDULE IN P LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILIT' EXISTING STRUCTURES FROM THE SITE. PUBLIC UTILITIES. 9, MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR STREETS AND STORM DRAINAGE 8. ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO SHALL BE OF LATEST REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY AND E~ Z l(J -900). THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD Z O ~ 8, THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DETERMINED 9• ALL UNDERGROUND PVC SHALL BE DR14 (C-900). AND/OR LATEST EDITION. AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, 1996, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF AND SUPPLEMENTAL W ~ ~ FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE SPECIFICATIONS THERETO, a U Q'i 9. ALL WORK PERFORMED SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR VARIOUS GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THE WORK. ACCURACY PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S/SUBCONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE VARIOUS UTILITIES 10. CLASS "B" TYPE I BEDDING SHALL BE USED UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE ~ a a a 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FOR APPROVAL TO THE OWNER'S ENGINEER SHOP AND TO MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANY RELOCATIONS OF THESE DRAWINGS, OR BY THE ENGINEER. ~1 ~ DRAWINGS ON ALL PRECAST AND MANUFACTURED ITEMS. FAILURE TO OBTAIN EXERCISE CAUTION UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL WATER SYSTEM TESTING AND INSPECTI D INSPECTION REQUIREMENT NOTES 11. ALL ROUND REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE JOINTS UNDER PAVEMENT, DRIVEWAYS, ~ ~ F' ~ APPROVAL BEFORE INSTALLATION MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT WHEN CROSSING ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY, WHETHER SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR LOCATED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY. ALL UTILITIES WHICH INTERFACE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 1. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, INCLUDING FITTIN 'LUDING FITTINGS, THRUST BLOCKING, AND SIDEWALKS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND ANY OUTFACE SYSTEM SHALL Q ~ ~ ~ WITH THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RELOCATED BY THE HYDRANTS, CONNECTIONS, AND VALVES SHALL REMAIN UNC( REMAIN UNCOVERED UNTIL PROPERLY BE WRAPPED WITH MIRAFI 14 ON FILTER FABRIC OR EQUAL FABRIC TO BE A MIN. 11. AT LEAST 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR AND SHALL COOPERATE WITH THE PRESSURE TESTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINI uVNER'S ENGINEER. PRESSURE TESTS TO OF 30" IN WIDTH AND CENTERED ON PIPE. ~ ~ THE ENGINEER AND APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND SUPPLY THEM WITH ALL APPROVED UTILITY COMPANIES DURING RELOCATION OPERATIONS.. ANY DELAY OR INCONVENIENCE BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WATER DEPARTMENT SPECIFICATIOI SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO ~ O Z GS THE CONTRACTOR'S NAME STARTING DATE, PROJECTED SCHEDULE, CAUSED TO THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR BY THE VARIOUS UTILITIES SHALL BE SHOP DRAWIN NOTIFY OWNERS ENGINEER AND COUNTY INSPECTORS 48 f•' 'ECTORS 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ~ ~ AND OTHER INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. ANY WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO NOTIFYING INCIDENTAL TO THE CONTRACT AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED. PERFORMING TESTS. THE ENGINEER OR WITHOUT AGENCY INSPECTOR PRESENT MAY BE SUBJECT TO REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PERFORM CHLORINATION AND BACTERIOLOGI G A 0 1. THE STORM DRAINAGE PIPING SYSTEM SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUAL INSPECTION ~ ~ ~ BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLIN ND BTAIN BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF BACKFILL, CONTRACTOR [-i CLEARANCE. OF DOMESTIC WATER SYSTEM. COPIES OF ALL I PIES OF ALL BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS TO TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTION. 12. WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL INTERFACE SMOOTHLY WITH OTHER BE SUBMITTED TO OWNER'S ENGINEER. WORK BEING PERFORMED ON SITE BY OTHER CONTRACTORS AND UTILITY COMPANIES. IT WILL BE NECESSARY FOR THE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE FITS 2, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS UNTIL FINAL ACTIVITIES, WHERE NECESSARY WITH OTHER CONTRACTOR AND UTILITY COMPANIES, PAVING AND GRADING NOTES ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT, THE STORM SYSTEM WILL BE INSPECTED BY THE OWNER'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO APPROVAL FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PURPOSES. 13. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY ARE TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXCAVATIONS AGAINST CONDITION OR BETTER. COLLAPSE AND WILL PROVIDE BRACING SHEETING OR SHORING AS NECESSARY. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE AND APPURTENANCES ARE BEING PLACED. 14. REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF ALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THIS DEWATERING SHALL BE USED AS REQUIRED. SANITARY SEWER NOT SEWER NOTES WORK SHALL BE RESTORED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER .THAN EXISTING SAFETY NOTES L BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND ~ di CONDITIONS BEFORE COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION WORK ~U~lLESS SPECIFICALLY 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE NECESSARY DEWATERING PERMITS FROM 1. A HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 10 FEET SHALL BE MAINTAIN 1, DURING THE CONSTRU%T;LiIJ AND/OR MAINTENANCE OF THIS PROJECT, ALL SAFETY EXEMPTED BY THE PLANS. ADDITIONAL COSTS ~ARE~INCIDENTAL TO OTHER CONSTRUCTION THE LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT OR OTHER REGULATORY AGENCY. SANITARY SEWER. AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION IS TO BE ALLOWED. REGULATIONS ARE Tb BE ENFORCED. THE CONTRACTOR OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE SHALL ~ Q ~ 3. PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED PAVEMENT OR GROUND SURFACE 2. ALL i;,ANITARY SEWER WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH LOCAL R WITH LOCAL REGULATORY STANDARDS AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL AND SAFETY OF THE TRAVELING PUBLIC AND THE ~ .SAFETY OF HIS PERSONNEL. LABOR SAFETY REGULATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE ~ ~ W SPECIFICATIONS, 15, ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE SODDED ARE TO BE SEEDED AND MULCHED GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON DRAWINGS. PROVISIONS SET FOR~TF1 BY OSHA IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ~ C-~ TO FOOT STANDARDS AND MAINTAINED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS 4. IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO FIELD ADJUST PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS TO PRESERVE THE ROOT ACCEPTABLE TO THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND ENGINEER OF RECORD HAVE BEEN SYSTEMS OF TREES SHOWN TO BE SAVED, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S 3. SANIT~4RY SEWER MAINS AND LATERALS SHALL HAVE A MlNlly OBTAINED. ANY WASHOUTS, REGRADING, RESEEDING, AND GRASSING WORK, AND OTHER ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY ELEVATION CHANGES. AND'SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCOMPANIED BY A METAL TAPE HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF THREE (3) FEET TRANSPORTATION. ~ A METAL TAPE SIMILAR TO "TERRATAPE" 2, 'THE MINIMUM STAI~DAr^~u~> AS SET FORTH IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE STATE OF EROSION WORK REQUIRED, WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR COLORED GREEN AND LAID ONE FOOT ABOVE THE PIPE. THE PIPE. FLORIDA, MANUAL ON TRAFF"IC CONTROL AND SAFE PRACTICES FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY ~ UNTIL THE SYSTEM IS ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY THE REGULATORY AGENCY AND 5. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A 1 2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL WITH SEALER / CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND UTILITY OPERATIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED IN THE W ~ ENGINEER OF RECORD. AT ABUTMENT OF CONCRETE AND ANY STRUCTURE. DESIGN APPLICATION, INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF ALL TRAFFIC d' CONTROL DEVICES, WARNING. DEVICES, AND BARRIERS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THE 16. CHAPTER 77-153 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIRES THAT AN EXCAVATOR NOTIFY ALL 6. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL CONFORM TO FOOT STANDARD INDEX NO. 17346, GAS UTILITIES A MINIMUM OF TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING. MAPS SHOW SHEETS 1-7. PUBLIC AND WORKMEN FROM HAZARDS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS, ONLY THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GAS MAINS AND DO NOT SHOW SERVICE LINES. THE 3. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL MARKINGS AND DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS SET ~i W ONLY SAFE AND PROPER WAY TO LOCATE EITHER MAINS OR SERVICE LINES IS BY AN ON- 7, CONTRACTOR SHALL TRIM, TACK, AND MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT AT LOCATIONS WHERE SANITARY SEWER TESTING AND INSPEC ND INSPECTION REQUIREMENT NOTES FORTH IN THE MANUA.!:.,OiJ UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PREPARED BY THE U.S. SITE INSPECTION BY THE RESPECTIVE GAS PERSONNEL. THEREFORE, EXCAVATORS ARE NEW PAVEMENT MEETS EXISTING PAVEMENT, 'T TO A VISUAL INSPECTION BY THE OWNER'S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. W INSTRUCTED TO TELEPHONE THE RESPECTIVE GAS COMPANY TWO WORKING DAYS 1. ALL ~~RAVITY SEWER PIPING SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A VISUA BEFORE ENTERING A CONSTRUCTION AREA. 8. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL/SEDIMENTATION BARRIER (HAY BALES ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HO 31NEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE o OR SILTATION CURTAIN TO PREVENT SILTATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, STREETS, INSPECTION. 4, IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY AND ENFORCE w F I ALL APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS, THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED a OR RECORDING } 17. RECORD DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE F AND STORM SEWERS. IN ADDITION, CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE STRAW, MULCH, OR OTHER FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S INFORMATION ONLY AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT THE OWNER OR Q o w INFORMATION ON A SET OF THE APPROVED PLANS CONCURRENTLY WITH CONSTRUCTION SUITABLE MATERIAL ON GROUND IN AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION RELATED TRAFFIC IS Z J ~ ENGINEER WILL INSPECT AND/OR ENFORCE SAFETY REGULATIONS, U U Z PROGRESS. WITHIN TWO (2) WEEKS FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTION THE CONTRACTOR TO ENTER AND EXIT THE SITE. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER AND/OR LOCAL SHALL SUBMIT ONE (1} SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER. THE AUTHORITIES, EXCESSIVE QUANTITIES OF EARTH ARE TRANSPORTED OFF-SITE EITHER FINAL RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: BY NATURAL DRAINAGE OR BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE ~ ~ w ~ a = SAID EARTH TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND/OR AUTHORITIES. d n. ~ 1. DRAWINGS TO BE LEGIBLY MARKED TO RECORD ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION, 9, IF WIND EROSION BECOMES SIGNIFICANT DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR 2. DRAWINGS SHALL SHOW ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL WATER AND WASTEWATER SHALL STABILIZE THE AFFECTED AREA USING SPRINKLING, IRRIGATION, OR OTHER N N Y Y Q1 PIPING AND RELATED APPURTENANCES, BOTH ABOVE AND BELOW GROUND. ALL ACCEPTABLE METHODS, CHANGES TO PIPING LOCATION INCLUDING HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL LOCATIONS OF, UTILITIES & APPURTENANCES SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN AND REFERENCED TO 10. THERE IS TO BE NO DISCHARGE (I.E. PUMPING, SHEET FLOW, SWALE, DITCH, ETC.} Q PERMANENT SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS. DRAWINGS SHALL ALSO SHOW ACTUAL INTO EXISTING DITCHES OR CANALS WITHOUT THE USE OF SETTLING PONDS. IF THE INSTALLED PIPE MATERIAL, CLASS, ETC. CONTRACTOR DESIRES TO DISCHARGE INTO THE EXISTING DITCHES OR CANALS A a~ aw 3. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL FIELD CHANGES OF DIMENSION AND DETAIL SETTLING POND PLAN PREPARED BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND INCLUDING CHANGES MADE BY FIELD ORDER OR BY CHANGE ORDER. APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD AND LOCAL REGULATORY AGENCY PRIOR TO ~o p U 4. DRAWINGS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW ALL DETAILS NOT ON ORIGINAL CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION. Z DRAWINGS BUT CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD. ALL EQUIPMENT AND PIPING RELOCATION SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN. 5. LOCATIONS OF ALL MANHOLES, HYDRANTS, VALVES, & VALVE BOXES SHALL BE w W ~~~1d~0~1V~~~.. UU p SHOWN. ALL VALVES SHALL BE REFERENCED FROM AT LEAST TWO (2) AND ~ d U O W w PREFERABLY THREE (3) PERMANENT POINTS. W ~ O O O I,I N O Q d~ c0 ~ PAVING & GRADING TESTING AND INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS O O N O Z 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING APPLICABLE TESTING WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. . p ~w>-~-oZ~ 2. SOILS ENGINEER TO SUPPLY THE ENGINEER WITH A PHOTOCOPY OF ALL COMPACTION w TESTS AND ASPHALT RESULTS. THE SOILS ENGINEER IS TO CERTIFY TO THE ENGINEER JUN ~ 9 2005 Z OF RECORD IN WRITING THAT ALL TESTING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL Z w REGULATORY AGENCY AND THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FOOT) FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. ~o plpNN~~~ C~RWAtERSVCS o ~ l - ~ vii 3. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW SOIL REPORTS AND BORINGS PRIOR TO BIDDING THE PROJECT ~ c~ w AND COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. N~ ~Q ~ 0}D PLANS SHALL SUPERCEDE SPEC BOOKS a~ >o IF A D SCREPANCY OCCURS CHECK PLANS ~ zW DRAWN BY: RJM nnin nnni-rnn-r rnininirrn ini ~eini-rinin HIVU I.UIN IHI~ I CIVVINLE IN VVI-\I I IIVV GtitGK HY: Kt./ ORIGINAL DATE: 08.17.04 SHEET 2 of 12 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 r m N SPACING Of POSTS FlLTER FABRIC M~ 00 ~ II~II IIIIII III I I II (III 1. TO BE 6-10 FEET APART MATERIAL Z I IIIIII III II I! I I i S NIT Y AN1VbLE ~'I~ I~ II~' 229 RI E - 1.31Q ~ I~ ~ I ~I~ c, S IE - 2 .2509 Za I I I ? 'i!~~ 1.4' X 1.4' CONCRETE COLUMNS N 1 1/4° PE 'MTH WOOD FENCE (TYP) °o ~ •m m M M 6' VC RU NIN I I i 4.. PE rp ~ I I I I' , • T RU AN OLE OP ~ ~_~_!,~~~I~, i~~ I II~1 lif ;;I :I. ~ p~ N N N N (3/79) " II ~ POOL DECK pp,07 COLUMN COR S ~ N 2 +2 m 2 3/79) m .°n E = 8.78 ° ~ ?~I j j~~ ~ ~~I I ~i ! III 0 . 'a : d~ ~ ;p:: 18,51 0.3' N X 0.2E SAN. EWER MAN, . ~ ~ , . r ~ ~ „ h; CONCRETE RETAINING WA L16,3 - UNKNOWN_ SIZE a N - - ~ - _ ; $ i. I I ill Ew c II :~'~kl ~ ' I I a Ali I i 4 , .a ; I Ir ~ ,I ~ 12.55 4,15 _ _ ~ - - - - FX > Q FND LB 6969 I. ~ ,r i i I ~ I i i i - SV - Nl ,GQ , "4'• ;'i ~Il lull 1 II 3D.as • ~¢s7 to .~~'l I..I I 4 i, ,i t 7 1 vl I VII I K•6~'''i - - I ~ G •7~ 'AS GAS --'1a. T~ ~ 28.79 s4WM - 27.12 11..11 27,60 ~ g x: a ;I ; ~ ~ r r, + u+ I ' ,vuw"x' FXC 2.77 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL ~ 1103 1101 .41 ~ 6" H 28.66 - Q , ,~~LIf.II ICI, i I E Ili ~ i 2'10 CA 28.78 FOR ADDITIONAL STRENGTH ~14" X10°4'12"19° .6,97 27.20 SANITARY MANI{k~ A N "VCP AiJ F ~ LOCATION (T FE < N C9 I Ili <<I!j' I( ~ ~ I ,:a ; GRAPHIC SCALE t~ ~I,l!~I;1' jtr 4v ; . ~~~•~'<n'Vi,,. FlLTER FABRIC MATERIAL CAN 104 + RIM EL = .52 {~I~ = 28.86 BE ATTACHED TO A 6-INCH {MAX) p 1 2~ SS 1. i 30JD ~ 31.16 30 ~ ~~~!III?'~}I 191 ~ _ SOUT LY LINE Y• 0 1s 3a so ~ ~ I VIII ~I I r ' I ~ MESH WIRE SCREEN WHICH HAS 111 4 S IE =.21:99 PARCEL TfIREE _ AS S NED TO THE POSTS ~4 105 ~ GEORGIA 5 E = 23.11 - i~//~ \ BACKFILLED TRENCH BEEN FA TE ~ II X109 ~ 2. Q 23.1 2722 .61 AS 3U.3 P D 1 v ~ lily I I n it U i I r\\j~\/ X12" ~2D" ~ 2883 RCEL 0 ~ L I~I~j~ ~?II'~III l ' ( I~ I t ~ 5 12 1106 102 23.7 6' ° ~ -13 END 114 11J a8 11° 26,90 _ 1108 ~3^ 24.3 PARE 2 4 Q . ~ l) I II~II!li~ ~I, ' - - R R Old (IN FEET) cL ilil j Ill,j I I` 1115 12" 14' ~ ~ - 14' ~14" ,g o F 3' FOP 1 1 ' ' D 21 1 inch = 3D ft. ~ Q I~'i~ii~~l,ll~~ ~ ~ ~I :~I tL.l,,III,I, L ~ ~ GI ^ 4.9' 04' 7 N 8,23 2°: r s a1' ' os' t` 2 5/d„ L ~ a 19 / ~ ~ J J(11111;{I~~lll~ NM ~ ' ~ < `I~Illll Ill I I I,! 14 FlLTER FABRIC ~ S 0.3' 1107 N , mrn m in orn°cq 4 ~'J I~n ;I I'G~~I`l~, ~ f ~ `N M ^o M c~ Q ~~ill'Ifl II ~ 'I MATERIAL SECURELY ~ 5.4 0 M FASTENED TO THE ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCES o is 22,5 ~I POSTS OR IF USED O 1 2" 11191 ~ THE WRE MESH _ _ r• 2.85 ~11 11 l lg o' ~ ¢ P ~l I Q ~ ~9lli?1111!.1 I I e ~ . M U' ~ z!) ljr!I If'~~1 I 4 i OR 3515, PG 221 2" lie t5 ~ a ' ~ r APPROXIMATELY a 10" 22 94 • ~1 ilf hl' ?li • t 1 !1 , I~I I ! , INCHES OF FlLTER PLACE THE END 1118 ~ 1 1 FABRIC MATERIAL POST OF THE ~12' 2 12" ~I( f!qj a _ LEGE~JD ~J ~ ' ~ I ~ , ! 4IU 0 INTO ~ ~ AUTRENCH AND BE ~ SECOND FENCE I ~ 193 INSDE THE END r ";IIMIL!?~ I , I 116 i''. ANCHORED WITH POST OF THE ^ry 124 1 12" -22.6 COMPACTED FlRST FENCE ~ 1 " I ~ 22.9 I i,~ll Icpll' BACKFlLL MATERIAL Q ~1fi l 1 n ~ Q ~ I 16' ~ O v0. N O WOOD OR ROTATE 80TH 5.3 187 1 g 190 ~ t\ ~ -I, O tl I\ STEEL POST POSTS AT LEAST I 85 8 26.35 if 190 DEGREES IN 5.3 15„ 11 192 5" ~ 28.5 28.4 PLAROUND I~ • ; ~I EXISTING ITEM/TREE TO BE REMOVED ~ u'_J ~.~o ~ i I'll"~~ il) , ~I" ~ ~ ~ o ~ M _ ~ l i~, ~ ~ ~I I~~ pl I I, - A CLOCKWISE I ~~!6 8 ~2` ~ 2623 16.57 RUNOFF ~ DIRECTION TO 3 ~ 1 ~2° ~ 149 48 , AREA ay Z i E. M M MM Md" N ~ ~If~m [_S', i l~pl!II il~'~ ~ 1D/ a' elf ~~yy5512' 1 CREATE A T1GHT -.Y2,5 ,7 . -I- J I / ~84 g^ p51 ~6" 28.7 9 T' p r~,° M I~~:Lt,''I '~II~I, Ij+• t I~'', ff l!11N , I , ~ I I. z I r1 d It \ ' ~ \ SEAL WITH THE J 182 8" r 11 u toE12^ 2B~ 2 ~ ; / / FABRIC MATERIAL 18 89 id 25,6--~ 25.6 V'M ' o ~O ~ Q M. PAVEMENT/BUILDING/CURBING ~ II~~ I I~ ~ I i~ ' of PARCEL E 178 ls' 4.2 ~ 1--- L~1T 6 26.7 a Ro 3z~ , 10 INCHES / OR 3515, I~EaZtPM OF RUNOFF WATERS 11" 0 3.7 175 173 1 x~X 1 .6 \ \ I 76 " 174 11" 58 59 TO BE REMOVED ~ ; 1 ~I~I hlll MIN \ \ ~ 7 1 5 " 168 / 155 25.7 p~~ ( l ~ ~ APPROIQMATE ! 1 ~ DRIVE BOTH 1 w12 13• "157 POI 1 ~~X I 1 i7° I POSTS ABOUT 10 6 , I\ M " Ilo~ I I<II r o U I'~a, illllil' I II ~ ~ I,I'll \ \ 4-INCH BY I 0 32" 1 ^~1 YY14 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 18.7 4-INCH TRENCH INCHES INTO 1HE ~ ~ 0" G 11"162 150 C 3 X3" IE 25.2 25J ~U GROUND AND CLUSTER I ~2 1 1 " 5' 1 18J 1~ E k ~ ~ 62 ~ ..28.7 e0 na . BURY FLAP 1 I 15• ~3" 14° 4 ~ 3' S4 I~ n N ~ m h LO JU 10 11D " ~4"164 17 26.0 ~ - - - - PROJECT LIMITS M ~ 01.. I ss B• 6 ~ A•~2~2 JENN! CAMS ^ o I ~ ~ rn o M; ' I SILT FENCE ~ Z ~ ~1r 165 ~ ~ SUBDI 9kQN ~ ~ ~ F?; 2A.4 G. 64 ~ CRY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Cb N 28'1 ~ 19'0 28.35 ; ~ ~ O ~ PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION v ° I -S.D ~ ~ ENGINEERING ^ ~ N - / W U~ cV-" ^ ~ M ~ M (1 lJ ~Wy 1,~ J DPAYN B7 INSTALLING A FlLTER ~ J I I ~ n °v 'Q N aca® er FABRI 4SILT FENCE iw xa O ' L0 5 28,65 N N e ~ I n p ir-xVnnr- r.n~rr;, i~.nn,l,^inni O . ~swmtn I n. C;. ,C ~~LivivlC. ..nV~_,: .;uC:vlvl.:VVly ~ 29.28 ~ ` ~ ~ F.I..I W PARCEL E~' o~,E ~"na ¢ a ~ ; ~ o ~ ; 2B.D I i L , i V v `I' r .r ~ OR 3557, PG 559 e ~ ° 3 / I 13P vF ...28.4 0' ~1. 1 I 77 ~ n M hJ P! INO I Z 9 ~-5.9 ~ 'P ~8" 133 ~ N `1' M e ` 25' x M.'~p..~ 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL Q ~ ~ W u?N v 5.1 ~ ~ .7.9 n ~ ~ /v~~, ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEMOLITION. W a ~I ~ ~e ~ ~ P CFI_ FOU 1125 N AR R I ~13' _ 24.OP ( 25.9 25.9 d V •M. QQ F ARC L FOUR ~ e ~ " 3r - 1126 g 1 5' ~ 3p ~ i¢v' 25,9 LOT 4 5s~ t2' Y w~ ~ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND ~ Z ~ ~ ~ . n~ M ~M M I!T v PARCEL E ` 12" 128 ~ ' _ " ~yti{ I N1 73' + M UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING SITE GEOMETRY WORK. I/~rJ, a OR 3557, PG 559 -1 ` N I 1" d. ~ • I--1 - ~ ~ FXC W ~ ~ ~ U v ~ . R 1 2" E 3.6 ~ Q . ~ ' ~ ' Q 125 I 143 4~ 021 ~ ICLDSTER 21.2 N2] ~13" T4 2.98 +7.1 2 128 f` FND 21 W 0.4 ~ • JO- ? ~ ~ ~ 1. 13.8' b~~'~ ry ~ Q TREE REMOVAL LIST (Harrison VIIIaQe & Island Vlew) PALM REMOVAL LIST (Harr[san V111aQe & Island View) 17"~ ~ ~ 126 28" 10" d. 0 120 / 128 r3 ~ " ,.;.1 ~ ~ Tree Number Stze ~ RatlnQ Tree Number Stze Tye Rating 2 11` I - la i~ (n ~ I 0143 ~ 1 ~~11 ~ 25,6 / APART OF SEC ION 9, ~TOWNSHI 19 7. REMOVE EXIS 6" ~ l7 38" Live Oak 4.0 33 10" Sabal Palm 3.0 A 9 ~ SANI MAIN PARCEL E tst / SOUThl, R NGE 75 EgST ~1~~ w FIR 5/8" ~ o JD_6 23 7.8 ti ry' PLS 286 a • ~ + ~ 38 35" Live Oak 3,5 34 10" SabalPahn 3.5 M 1 . , 40 7" Holly 3.5 48 12" Sabal Palm 3.5 OR 1324 PG 520 ~ ~ i I • J 14" / i ~ Q N 0.6' d / ~ ~ 42 26" Laurel Oak 3.0 49 12" Sabal Palm 3.5 J / .121 ~ I ~ U W 0.5 'N I i ~J ~O ~2 ~ 6~5°__ ~ ° `F 17!22' I 7.924 O-„= N ~ ~ ' a 46 30" Live Oak 3.0 50 10" Sabal Palm 4.5 Q . ' ~ 53 i2" Laurel0ak 3.0 51 10" Saba1 Pahn 3.0 FT ~ OT 2. 0 ° R1' ~ O}(~~~ O 112 ~11" OH N r,~ 0 ~ o O rh~''(>r FCM 4"X4" I NN ? r' LL ~ ~ ^ 60 6'' • P [ickory 3.0 52 10" Sabal Palm 3.0 F~ U) _ 7.6 BFa ~ 6' N ~w n'~ N SIR 127 5" "5^ FCM 4"X4' ' 104.69' N q . = Q °.~4n 63 4" Hickory 3.0 54 10" SabalPabn 3.0 ~ Q ~ ~ ~M• . 64 14" Live Oak 3.0 66 11" Washington Palm 3.0 ~I F R 1 2.. . 6" 1 ~1" ~ ~ I - x J ° 29 / ~ 4 , 113 ~ O N IE - 25. I R, _ m 4C3 J~• 0117 ~ M I ~ N p 69 10" NorfolkPine 3.5 67 11" Washington Palm 3.0 III ~ N ~ ~ Qh ^ ~ 24.4 N 25.8 GRATi ~ ~~sq \ iN 25.30 O 26.0 GE r J \ ~ ~ N IE Z ~ µ 71 10" Live Oak 3.0 68 11" Washington Palm 3.0 ~ ~ I-~ 2.68 \ ~ ~ N 25,45 R ~ ~,r~ 15.9 E IE , N' ' n:M ; „ 72 28" Live Oak 3.5 78 10" Washington Palm 3.0 o• 73 40" Live Oak 4.0 103 10" Saba1 Pahn 3.0 ~Ll JD-3 N \ ~ 6.3 ~ ^ 1?F ° rddF ^ W IE ~ . ~ ' . ~ 74 5C" I,iveOak 3.5 107 12" SabalPalm 3,5 \ 23.7 ~ ~ n ~ ~ / I In 28.1 ~ :.8.1 D 75 6''; . S iash Pine 3.0 108 14" Saba1 Palm 3.0 yM °i• ~ ~ 76 v ` Slash Pine 3.0 109 11" Sabal Palm 3.5 ~ O N J m ^ D1 ~ ~A PART OF SECTION .S, iOWNSNI ~ N 3 0 < 0~1/2~F M + ,M 77 13" Crape Myrtle 5.0 110 13" SabalPalm 3.5 N -2 ~ ssj.1fire S UTH RANGE 15 FAST ° ,R4 ° ~ 29.16 0.4' f , 9 . 81 8" Crape Myrtle 3.5 113 12" Saba1 Pahn 3,5 ~ w 82 8" Crape Myrtle 3.5 114 12" Sabal Palm 4.0 ® H 23.5 , ~ REMOVE EXISTI6M,~ ~ ~ 86 42" Live Oak 4.5 115 ,13" Sabal Palm 3.5 vij ~W N° (/z ~ 88 25" Live Oak 3.0 120 12" Sabal Palm 3.0 ~ O v ~ ~(10" R ~ N a f'N I 23.5 4j 3Das ~ " 89 22" Live Oak 3,0 128 13" Sabal Palm 3,5 N ~ : d 9D 24" ,Live Oak 3.0 129 11" Sabal Palm 3.5 W )0 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ of ^ ~ 6.1 ~ U LB 2/ " ~ 91 15" hickory 3.5 142 11" Washington Palm 3.0 ~ W I''J ? N. t f0 N ~ ~ M 2.91 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,V,~~ ~ 26.59 N HU ~ ~ ~ . w os ~ I 92 IS" 'Hickory 3.5 149 12" SabalPalm 3.0 n O JD-1 n ; p ~ N I ~ ~ N +23.4 ~ ~ 1~~ X~l'v' 26.61 O ~ y ' 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ t`'1 O ~ 16.1 ~ ~ M n ~ ry Z'1.23 - 31.41 ..7~ 3G 33 "0 ~ ~ 94 14" Hickory 3.5 W H ~ NITARY ANH01. ~ 97 9" Crape Myrtle 3.0 TOTAL PALMS TO BEREMOVED = 25 Z ~ 31.39 7 > M EL = 1.78 M 0.9 JD Lt ~ I X ~ ~ 3,05 FCM 4"X " FXC , . ~ .1 - - - .23.04 1 io' - 3,2' ~ ~ r~ ~ I IE = 26 48 (~1 + ~ 98 9" Crape Myrtle 3.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ IE = 26 47 • 101 9" Crape Myrtle 3.0 ~ Q ,y~ M J~ ~ VACATED ]0' ALLEY s.e ~ 1 , o o ~ ~ 2 2 8.4 0.89 ~ i;9'Q ~N -I-i7.2 ~ pq~7 24.2D ~ u~ ~M s ~ ~ m E 102 10" 'Crape Myrtle 4.0 ¢ p ~.i ~ ~ h ~ Q,° / ~ ~ -x24.37 x FIR 1/2.. w" Q N , ~ ~ti F~~,AA"X4" ~ 25,96 ~q ~ OHL i N ~ 121 5" Hickory 3.0 Z 4 ~ J ~ ~ U'~ N I 22.96 W ~ t` ; < Fes` ~ .I N r ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ SAN~ARY MANHOLE / M M 124 10" 'Crape Myrtle 3.0 U U Z ~ v _12~_ 10" Crape Myrtle 3,0 w w I- O I\ U O ~6 .2229'- VO ~ .I6~ ,aN RIM~EL = 26.33 C .C (p -aN4-----'---7 ~ V ~ 0A 26.2 N u~ N IE~ 22.87 M•• 126 5" Bald Cypress 3.0 O O w 1\ ~ I ~ ~ W r ~ d' ~1 ^ ° J ~ S IE 22,89 ~ -15.6 ~ ~ ^7N ;d e • I 1° SW IE~ 23.05 • . , . 127 6" Bald Cypress 3.0 ~ ~ _ a a cn Q ~ 131 7" Bald Cypress 3.0 20.23 ~ N ~ ~ p ~ 02' - W IE ~ 23.D3 ~ ~ M 132 l9" Live Oak 3.5 ~ LOT A CLOVlS C. LU , 9 3p,W 8~ ~ ~ SUBD1Vl 0 n c^~o 57g~ ~Q ~ 144 20" Live Oak 3.0 N N Lb ~ P.B. 35, G. 76 , ~ " a ~ ~ ~ }1,5 SANITA~Po'~4 AM Gip ~2 - - ~ 31. 160 l6" Hickory 3.0 Y Y m 32~ 8' POT E'~' TOTAL INCHES 634" I +14.0 13,98 ~ P~1RC~L FOUR ~ 1 NE =3.03 FOP ~ ni N FIT "t.z ~ o ATER M n ~ Z ° 14.5 5 I : - 22.85 SIR '1 1 2" J 0.9' S . 5W IE = 3.54 c, 03 - n.4' W SIR o at 1° ~ M 8' SAN ~ (n N O, N LOT B I ^O NW IE =.19c ~ ~ ,r > ~ ; o, ' ~ ^ r 12 89 4418 W . ,3' 133.61 FOP 1 1 ^ , 2.4' S ~ R~ ~ ~ • Q Z ^ ~ ' ~o ~ v, n.DS ° ~ E os~ RTION LOTS 2 ~ - 3Ds ^ ~ - 7 - o ~ M 1 I b .0' i BLOCK 2 28.1 3" S D ~ ~ J 19 ~ t I\ tla 99ltEtlrr aA P.+y ~ O ••'~7, O V ~ Ise ro 1 STORY o JONES SUBDIVISION OFI w o ° `5 '22'~ 67.07 m 4 , NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO pg _ 2 N ~ 2888 28.72 STRUCTURE N CLEARWATER HARBOR P.B. ~1 ~I~1 0,5' _ ^ I ~ M ~ ~ O U (n ' . 11 FCM 4" a. ' % ",j3 r' iNISHED FL00 s' ~ , PG.13 HILLSBOROUGH COU19~Y 3D.5 a^ 8.86 22,1 ~o N t r ~ d ~ ~ ~ P ^SANI Y M~J,~OLE ' EXI 19 d. ~ J W j~7 a ~ T W ~ ^ RIB EL X5.78 J I U ~ W W m N ~ IE = 22.98 : CA N r:® ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~S IE = 22.97 , ~ ~ N 8 WOOD PINES w ~ ° 2 UI w ~ ~ W I[ = 24,02 SHED 9• N 0 ~ ~ ~ tl2 25,43 25.7 • . /v vy r n HARDWOODS DRIP LINE SPECIFlC4nON5 -WOOD R4RflIER e e 2 S_ 89 59 22 W ~ ,~y ui ~ p rv 2 N ~ FIR 1/2 2&9 d o w a DRIP UNE 1. MINIMUM RADIUS TO BE PROlEL1ED; TREE REMOVAL LIST 312-404 No Osceola Avenue) PALM REMOV ST 312.404 N ° sceola Avenue PALM REMOVAL LIST 312.404 Noll IN N PLS 3138 , ~I + • ° A HARDWOODS - 2/J DPoPl1NE N ~ D 1y & CONIFFAS & SABAI. PAlA19 - ENRRE OPoPUNE, O O LL ~ W ~ N ~ 305 31~ Tree Number Slze Tyke Rati°): Tree Number 4 Size ~ RatinB Tree Number Size Tye Rati°¢ ~ 2" CL GAS "P~7n w MAIN ~ 2. UPRIGHTS - NO LESS TNAN 2' % 2' LUMBER, N O ¢ a 3, HOPoZONTALS - NO LESS THAN 1' % 4" LUMBER, d' (D ° N 2528 O~ rh . 30.5 4, B+RAIERS SHNL BE ERECTED AROUND AIL O O 2 12" Podocarpus 3.0 8 6' Canary Isl Pabn 3.0 89 30' Sabal Palm 5.5 25,3 29 4 3 9" Live ak 3 0 ~ ~ 2" CI C R ~ o O 9 12 Sabal Palm 3.0 90 30 Sabal Palm ' AS ~r~9N 25. w M ' " ~ PROTECTED TREES AND PAIMS, AND INSPECTED BY 6 10 Laurel0ak 3.0 10 13 SabalPalm 3.5 91 20 SabalPalm 4. g ~ d' ^ ,o ~,a~{y CITY REPRESEMATTVE BEFORE CONSTRUCRON BEGINS, r N O ~ ~ ~Q 8. UPflICHT PO51S ARE TD BE AT LEAST 4 FEET IN IENGTH Z ~~ttVV WRH A MINIMUM OF 1 FORT ANCHORED IN GROUND AND 3 11 39" Live Oak 3.5 20 16 Sabal Pahy 4.5 93 12' Saba1 Palm 3.5 -a ~ h° LoT 1 ~ ~ ~ LOT 2~T2 '3~ 19 28" Live Oak 3.0 27 10' Sabal Paln1 3.0 94 l0' Sabal Palm 3.5 5 oR o BLOCK 2 h ^ ~ BLOCK 2 c FEET ABOVE GROUND, C W ~ - to - O Z to 26 28" Live Oak 3.0 30 3.0 RMELMA26.16E ~lg~~^ ~ - - 2G Sabal Palm 3.0 95 11 Sabal Palm ~j ? 2.8' ~ 8. BARRIERS TO REMUN IN PLACE UNRL All PANNC, CONSTRUCRON PND HEAVY EOUIPMEM IS OUT OF AREA D: 28 24" Red Bay 3.5 36 20' Queen Palm 3.0 103 21' SabalPalm 5.0 ATCH BASIN ~ N IE = 19.34 ~ JONES SUBDIVISION OF ~ P9 + IM EL = 25,40 ~ ~ h N E IE - 11.46 (66" RCP) ~ NICFIOLSON'S ADDITION TO 3 ; ,7 27.6 - - + - - - +8~3 - - FURMER INFORMATION MAY BE OBTNNED FROM THE LAND Z RESOURCE SPECl4l15T AT 582-4741 Z 29 12 Laurel0ak 3.0 39 10 SabalPalm 3.0 104 18' SabalPalm S.OR IE = 19,49 N Vl O. N ^ E IE = 9,BB (42" RCP) r\ N CLEARWATER HARBOR P.B. 1 I y 2, - 27.7 33 27" HiCko 4.5 N c"b N ~ W IE = 8.52 ~ ~ ° ~ + 27,4 IE - 27.69 rh ry 44 25 Queen Palm 4.0 105 21 Sabal Palm 4.5 ^ ~ r~ _ ~ ~ ~ 31.6, I W „ ~ ;~PG.1~, HILLSBOROUGH CDUNTY295 3p•7 3121 8.9 = 40 12 Laurel0ak 3.0 46 12 SabalPalm 3.5 106 20 SabalPalm 4.5 ~ ~ "t^ rn 30.8 27.2 ~ Cn ' a 2 3 OF D IP UNE ~ p cp ~ `1V ENTIRE D IP UNE w 48 27" Live Oak 4,0 47 20' Sabal Palm 3.5 108 18' Sabal Palm 3.5 ~ ^ X11` ~ ~ : m 49,0 272 _ - - - - 51 14" Live Oak 3.0 - 5.31 25.33 ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ 271 -!28.1- 52 20 Sabal Palm 5.0 110 15 Sa 3. +25.58 ~p, - - - - 28r~ N ~ ~h~~ 31.3 ~ I~ o o: AF2 ~ , m ~ UPRIGHT UPRIGHT Z W 74 29 Live Oak 3,5 ~ , MANHOLE Ohs 2h.54 g. TWS I~ 29,3 p 9 ,°f`1t ~ ~ " 9.0 ~r ° 53 11 Sabal Palm 3.0 111 15 Sa m= 4.0 ~ ~M 3" .7 ~ M ° ~ ~ CO to ' " ' + M ~ ~ HORRONTAL II~~ ~ HORIZONTAL !n W .N n P.. N~ 87 $'~HICk -1'-Saba!' ZOO----521)a11Pa~m~~3 ~ ~ OH 0 - 97 11" Hickory 4.5 69 24' SabalPalm 4.0 113 17' Sabal = 6.60 4,5 off wv 27.BS SIR NORTHERLY R/W LINE sIR S89 59 2 ,3~J 50.0( 102 23" Laurel0ak 3.5 71 23' Sabal Palm 5.0 114 20' abalU"~„, _ 19.21 ;,pg 5.95 42" RCP 2.13 ^ - - S +WWE - 8,79 24.55 ~ G6 RCP ~2 13~N 50.00 3D,52 " ~ z _ --mc,~,m. Z } ~ CD II o 0 129 25" Live Oak 3.5 72 22' SabalPalm 5.0 1l5 l6' SabalPalm 4. 24'75 VERT CONFLIIC6T BOX W/ STORK TOTAL INCHES 334" 75 IO' Date Palm Cluster 5.0 116 20' Sabal Palm 5 0 0 COt• STORM MANHOLE ~ONE~~~~IyIPMFN'I SANITARY MANHOLE RIM EI STORM MANHOLE 66" RCP ¢ JHOIE RIM EL = 30,23 P .A 7W o~ RIM EL = 26.34 TT~T{ +2984 RIM EL = 30.55 30,52 E IE 78 10 Date Palm Cluster 4.5 117 20' Saba1P ~ 3 E IE = 23.30 +27.5G +28.46~MRF~ ~ I 4~0 .23 55 30,52 E IE = 11.94 ~C/ 31.06+ ¢ N ~~="T FILLED W/ DIRT + Q o W IE 79 20 Sabal Palm 4.5 l l8 l9' Sahal .5 45f, +25.fi9 SW IE = 23.27 RECLAIMED WATER ~ _ METER INSIDE ITER Q ~ w IE = 11.88 +30.67 31.09+ O f 80 12' Sabal.Palm 3.0 119 20' Sabal , .5~ ~ ;OgITARY MANHOLE 8" VCP _ 81 32' Sabal Palm 5.0 l24 l8' Sabal Palm Iyi) EL = 25.46 26.1 26.35 273D 26.32 2B,ls 28.45 _ a"vvcP_ TREE BARRICADES JUN 09 106 ZW 30.95 1 1/4" PE N.T.S DRAWN BY. RJM 82 20' Sabal Palm 4.0 24.08 N IE = 22 4 ~7~7-- . ~ 9. . A . ~ INSER D INTO PLANNING$DEVELOPf~E i 24.6 - 2~~5 25.61. 9 " J , a• . a^: 3U.01 sit ~n c.s.,to.,t.,, en Tmm~rnernec•rnnr:nceRrn~cn_nc 24.52_ L 1 - 2 78 .,79.72. SANITARY MANHOLE rl!-t 7a1 Q uwua~auuu ~.v avaru.ina.ir~~ •v uu iu;inv ra:u-~~ It = [[.~U V -r~ rr*rm 2743- 2 • 29.86 30.14 I LED WITH WATER '•7.5.62 12" PVC 97 30.26 RTEL 3o 4z la6/l CLEAR iER G5 .,~LTIlYVLCNh(WAItFi CHECK BY: KEJ12 NEIE=27.04 Or %,LLAKVVAlvR,--mR!D ro 1 ABLE TO MEASUR c J J0.17 ;30.40 3093 R~ N PE S17E:S a Q 27.64 - .62 N~ E IE = 26.92 MAIN 3h PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 5 IE = 27.09 = ENGINEERING ORIGINAL DATE: 04,15*:Wm:i TREE BARRICADES SHEET N m_. ry CATCH BASIN 0,~. 6 RIM EL = 25.68 ` GAS MAIN 50.84 N t = D _ 12" RCP N NE IE = 23.31 EIE=21.59 SEIE=23.38 A :Wm:i ommn TREE BARRICADES SHEET rN SIE=20.54 WIE=23.13 ~Z5- s ° oo "oamm LANDSCAPE STANDARD ~ I of I +26.00 w o Orp vi { N 3 of ISSUE DATE: 06.09"05 }Cl - ~ ra A - +f. It o a- GENERAL NOTES: ~ R s; r W ~ i1: ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC & ASSOCIATES, INC. Z ~ ~ .l j- ~ N .L St ~ ~ N~I.hQ. ` 701 ENTERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 Z ~ ~ p~''1~~~° t 1`l 4 e 11 cn, ~ { . ~ r> ~ .h SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34695 0 LEGEND L I I 1 727 793-9888 Bus l~ ~ ' t v. ~ 0.- ~'(Ui~~~~~s ~ 727 793-9855 Fax , s~ r~l1~,Fv ~,rlrrl e 2, SITE ADDRESS: kl k `L = L.il , 40'x24' LOAD NG AREA I SPECIAL MARKING sRECIAL MARKING cROSSwALK ~ Ir 1 :PARCEL 1: 09-29-14310-000-0080 PARCEL 9: 09-29-15-44352-002-0010 ' ~ ~ ~ (TYP.) TYPICAL. ~ ~ ~ PER FDOT INDEX ~ s w ~ -PER FDOT.INDEX 417348 (TYP:) '~~''r°N'- 404 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE N0 PHYSICAL ADDRESS ~l ('U M~r~r,a.,. 'iU~ ~ , ;~1 EMERGENCY ACCESS ROADWAY ,,:rr: 2 20'x20'. SIGHT ~ " f " -°~_PROJECT BOUNDARY u~ I NSIBILITY TRIANGLE% (iYP,) ~ _SAW CUT ~C MATCH • . 1 24"'FS,TOP_BA ~ I CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA - ~ - (1) R1 1 "sTOP sLGNL_____ - ~ U PARCEL 2: 09-29-15-14310-000-0100 PARCEL 10: 09-29-15-44352-002-0012' ~ - _ _ , ..W ::STABILIZED GRASS.! ( h. ~ l ,,(1) R1-1 STOP; EXISTING PAVEMENT CURB ~ " 1 24 FS,TOP"BAR" " !f ' ~ , r'~ )r > I rQ 400 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS OVERHANG/FLOOR ABOVE _ _ ; _ _ _ _ _ r.}, ~ , , Ja`''i - , _ END OF CURB ~ r L!s ~ GRADES (TYP k :,as l~J~ 2~~a ~ (,2) 20'x20' SIGHI I- i ~ - - - - - - - 7''' r r ~ " -f. VISIBILITY TRIANGI {z) 2o's2o' SIGHT ~ 1+9Gf v ~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ; ` ~ ~I EXISTING TREE CANOPY TO REMAIN / \ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - ~ , , R1-t "STORi'SICN _ ~a s VISIBILITY TRIANGLE (TYP.) iee~~' w _ SAW CUT do MATCH s~sa PARCEL. 3; 09-29-15-00000-430-0400 PARCEL 11: '09-29-15-44352-002-0020 U ~ `-X ; ,:r I ~ L : , (1) .24" STOP, BAR `;~'a EORGIASTREE a X , r „ ~ o Li+ r tN'~C~~ t4`-VERTICAL 40' R1W EORGIASTREET EXISL PAVEMENT 3 I is , (2) lCr^RA RS W/ TRUN ATED c.~~ ~ Do s,ts R~'DOr INDEX 3og 314. N. OSCEOLA AVENUE. N0 PHYSICAL ADDRESS ~ 40' R1W w/ s" stRAICHT_ , „ I s ~ (rY~~) ' CLEARWATER,'FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ Q I ~i~ Ii II, t !R5 , EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED t ~ / 1r. I .CLEARANCE BELOW I~ r I , l?,1~ X CURB{TYP)~=~'~r3 ` rI Fs~S~ ~.1~~`_ I y:~ (2) "NO PARKING/LOADING ~ ~ DORTE-COCHERES _ f ' ' ! I ~ ~t-~ PARCEL 4; 09-29-15-OOODD-430-0600 PARCEL 12; 09-29-15-00000-430-0300 ~ 1 ~ r. ' ~~NE' NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS- 309 OSCEOLA AVENUE SPACE ZONE SIGNS $ : R~• (TYP.) ~ , ~ . ,r , INTERIOR OPEN ~ X X X R x~ ' CONCRETE SURFACE X / ~ ~ ~ - ~ . ~ / , . .y' , M , ~ EPIEP ; nl~ CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ ~ I ~I j.. { ~ ' . ~ ~ E %,~I i I PARCEL- 5; 09-29-15-00000-430-0500. PARCEL 13: 09-29-15-14310-000-0010 ' q , ' , , - _ - v ~ ~ ~ ;ml ~ 312 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE 410N. OSCEOLA AVENUE u1j Z ' ' ~~;.y~~',., WOOD DECK /WALK ~o ~ , . ~ ,f , , y,, ~ ~ ; ~ ~s' ~ j I' CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758. CLEARWATER,- FLORIDA ~ ~ , ~ y ~ ~ I ASPHALT SURFACE I I I~ 6" coNC. LIFT N s ~:~a x ~5 STA110N PAD , ` ' ' ~ PARCEL 6; ~ 09-29-15-53370-000-0010. ~ ~ ~ f sTEp RISERS 1 i= ,,.{E,, ~ N0 PHYSICAL ADDRESS ~ Ij I g / X z , r BUILDING FOOTPRINT ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ I\ - v :3.1 ~ X ~ S , . G x ~ EsT~P~~RisE6s. ~~VI E I PARCEL 7: 09-29-15-53370-000-0020 ~ ~ _ . 0 C. SIDEWALKS... X _ ~E~I: 1 E: ; / ~ ~ ~~€~rl, ~1.. I ERIOR C N ---1 I ~ . e / ~ R~ P ~,~€.I . ~,~I/~HAR~N a.6s' ~ tYp.} ~ ~'~'G CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~ m ~ < v: f~ TAd. l }JI' ( NO PHYSICAL: ADDRESS ~ 0 I~ .I; I t ah 1 X ~ F Q-° ~ 3,687.25 SF ~ ~ CLEARWATER FLORIDA ~ ~ ~ ' ~ FETE = 32.5 ' ~ 11J ~ I' I I ~ I I ~I'4.6T s ~ ' PARCEL B: 09-29-15-07940-000-0021 ~ Z ( y ; 4s7' G 4sT ~ I ( 300 N. OSCEOLA AVENUE ~ ~ ~ N v: X b Y " ' 'i X' f~~' ~I I - a F, :I . _I p i ~ u : fi ~ X / ; A I.': I CLEARWATER FLORIDA z _i~ T_ , X - 4 x- X I r : I ~ r ~ ~ u, I , , i a n:, I ~ r~ ~ Y 1; `~'IC;, I ~ ~ ~ ~ ria I _I ~ r r ~ i.- f X ,f ~ :1 I ~ I ~r ~ : ~XX r,. r ' ~ ~ ZONING, ..D.. 1i I J Y ~ it ~ y~~,` ~ ~ ~ U--I X I~. 1 I t ~ R ~ ~ LI ~ ;1i I I~ II I ~ ~ ~~r„ ~8 3 a ~ ~ , ~ r ~ ~ , i, { ~C'ti , nu ~ LI ~~c~,~.. M ~h=~ ;^3,.PRESENT.USE ATTACHED DWELLINGS RETAIL SALES & SERVICE ~ U , ,I ~ C _ r,,, , . ' : F4~1~`~~ ' 4. DEVELOPED USE RETAIL /OFFICE /ATTACHED DWELLINGS MIXED USE v s . ; ; FFE = 22.00 I ~ i I I 1, , ~ ~ - : l 4 ~ e sT a l;~ 5, TOTAL SITE AREA ~ HARRISON VILLAGE 52,947,90 SF (1.21. AC) ~I ' I'" ISLAND VIEW 163,583,05 SF (3,75 AC) H Z L{J x 'I'°:-, ~I r `-'I If II s, ,r" ili 1 _ _ a'x ~4.1~ Ix I, Imp, ~I ~ ;I } X X , . , ~ ~ ' L. I _ a X- ~ J In ~ G • TOTAL 216,530,95 SF 4.97. AC Z O ~ I h• ' PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 26,388,30 SF 0.60 AC ~ ~ ~ ' ' X - ~i ' u l r ~ STEI STEP RISERS III r PROPOSED REQUIRED Ij ~ r ' r ~ ~ , 1 ~ r tT r~ X:. uEee ~ ~ ~ ~ I';l;:~~1, r' r , 6. SETBACKS: a . - ,l - DECK - X _ ' ~T*: y ;~.r~ ~ ISLANDVIEW CONDOMINIUMS 24.96 MIN, (NORTH BUILDING) OAO I~IN. (NORTH BUILDING) Q ~-1 !i ' _ x. I, ' a x Se ~ a ~~t~ yf,~.`t & GARAGE a a W 2.~1' - i- ~ ' K; 51.29 MIN WEST BUILDING D.DO MIN WEST BUILDING . ? I ~ r~JJ ~~d ~ .1 i ~y n~ J ~ - ~ r ' - ~ r , ' 34.48' MIN. SOUTH BUILDING 0,00' MIN, SCUTH BUILDING E~ ( ( ) r. ' ; . _ - I ~ ' ~ : W 0.' _ ~a • 0,00 MIN, SOUTH DUMPSTER PAD 0,00 MIN, SOUTH PAVEMEN Q-r' T. ~ ( } ) W JI' °s" ~ F .~~5? .e' ~ 4' WOOD WALK oa I ~ ~ i- ' ; r 20.50 MIN. (EAST BUILDING) 0.00' MIN, EAST BUILDING) A O F., ,,7 _ _ _ c~ f l-a y~ a~~ `u i ~ t~ ~I ~ a r,: ~ ; 0,00 MIN. (EAST SIDEWALK) 0.00 MIN, (EAST SIDEWAIK) ~ G4 ' ~~ti~7~~ ~ q n 4 ti STEI r w m at:,.~ ,~5:~7~~'it,.l`~t'~, :L%~s~ 4YS~~A:, W1,4 LID :r r -ip ~1~ ~ n= ~ ' r s ~ - i l.,,H9 rGi, G7~ ! ;nr I '-sTEP RISERSHARRlSQ~N, ~ sj ry HARRISON VILLAGE 11.63' MIN, (NORTH BUILDING) 0.00'.MIN. (NORTH BUILDING) a - ' VILLAGE ~ ~ ~ " 0.00' MIN, (NORTH PAVEMENT) 0,00' MIN.' (NORTH PAVEMENT} ~ O j , 1>, , ~ SIR - ,PLANTER Xs ! I : X , ~ . r , E , -ET = ~3i ELI').? Y r r L 1 ~ t I I ' i 1~,,. RETAI F{..~ 11~ & U~JITS ~ " u: I 19.06' MIN, (SOUTH BUILDING) 0.00'. MIN, (SOUTH BUILDING) ~ U ~ ' N ~ TLA I _ WE D , ; . PAF~KING GARB E; 19,52 5E Ll.l 8" s AICHr aiR~' ~ 0,00' MIN. (SOUTH PAVEMENT). 0.00' MIN, (SOUTH PAVEMENT) ~ ~ 5 ' .BUFFER X''.'' X :,f % ~ ~ ; , ` $A ACHEDUN' ~ 8' ~ 4 ~ ? t a I r' , ra , / I ' TYP ~ J i FIDE, = 32,5 ~ a` (T~~) , ; ~ 4.6T MIN, (EAST BUILDING) 000', MIN, (EAST BUILDING) a' t`" U ~ , r ~ _ - I ,123.87 SF'I - - ; , B' ~ 0.00', MIN. (EAST PAVEMENT) 0.00' MIN, (EAST PAVEMENT) C-~ 8 I~ ~ ~ I ~ I 4.6T MIN. (WEST BUILDING) 0.00' MIN, (EAST. BUILDING) i FFE 32.0` I I 50' R-O-W ~ ~ ~ „ r ~ , , ur 3y~- '~:;3 ,~r~,: I _ I_~ ky?~ . r jr~ 2 ~'><20' SIGHT~~ISIBILITY ,I _ ~ r , ' m N 0.00 MIN, (EAST PAVEMENT) 0.00 MIN, (EAST PAVEMENT) , ~ - f • ; ~ „ r I:: ~ ,,;~P -1RIANGLES (TIP.} 2,6T : 2;67 ' I ;~;fi p I d' _ z! -r7 qj~ I,; K :~`Ff?~~71 I I~'.~~ Y ~ p~~ri~'~,. f, STORMWATER , = .F,, , ~ , l I,, _ r ~ - ? ~ _ _ f I , ~ . I i ~ ; ' ~ .r' i ~ is I J,:9.ila~"X ` H°~ , °,r,,E~ _.~II. ~ z 1.7.~ALLOWABLE MAXHEIGHT 30'-50' FT. POND X" ~ f / A. I , ; I < ' I~L,.___ s.? i , ~ • : pla 1 X , X I1 . . I 5~ WIDE'ARCHITECTURAL CONC yti . , , tfi}. •~,'r; I~ c . r 21 a`' Y ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ o N ` I I°j PROPOSED BLDG. ,HEIGHT 40 -0 FT. (HARRISON -VILLAGE & .ISLAND VIEW VILLAS} i ~ ~ . rn'~ .9.c , _ _ ill . ~ ISIDEWALK & aANDING ~ > . I 1 r- X _ ; > . ~ - I ~ a ~ (FROM BFETO PARAPET) / Rte' -r ' '\\I ~ ~ I (SEE.. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ' ` ~ , { - / _.,i II _ .~,,.J, `v'';~.,:~) ~ - FQ14 DETAILS) t' ix ~ z a I . - I ~ ~ a: ~ ~ ,f, a _ ~ ~ ~ I _ 150'-8° FT. (ISLAND VIEW TOWER) I r~,l ~ z , (FROM BFE TO ROOF DECK). ~ - ~ STE ~ ~ TRANSFOR~!ER PAD . / % r ~ X ' M. ' ~ r f . " r, STEP RISfERS k. I : _ / ~ I... , I~ ~ y, , hti4. ~ I LOCATION (TYP:)~ Y _ • _ ~ ; ~ f^•~"1""t I ~i~ u it ~ W va c' ~ / _ X _ / 1:.. jl~ I ~ ,r ~ I r ~ ~ ' , i CATi6N/PUBLIC ART ~ ~ I~ ~ ' M ' A ~ Y F R 8, SOLIDW,~STE -WILL BE PROVIDED WITH TWO DOUBLE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, TWO COMPACTORS, r' ; LO N (SEE ARCH. ~ . ~ H F • ~ PLANSiIFOR DETAILS) 7, I w' AND ROLL-OUT DUMPSTERS. ~ _ T ,,I. ~ ' - A r _ / „ „ , II i. c ,~,.I: ~ - • , I . ~ , _ ~f: 7, , ' M 19. EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS TO BE REMOVED = 36,873.37 SF X I _ ~ ~ _ _ < ~r,~~, XX ' r ~arci( H , ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ I "S s 1; r ~ y 'X _ ' 10. ALL DI`~iURBED AREAS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED OR PLANTED. A R-0-W USE I ~ g ~ j I I ~ ~ <Z j PERMIT ~~rILL BE REQUIRED fOR.LANDSCAPING AND.ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN R-0-W l 4' WOOD WALK.. ; _ ; ~ 1 I _ ~ _ _ I ~ . ~ t _ . , ~r~l, ~ - I ~ I I. ~N I ~I ~ _ X nEC,. i I I ,I~s( ~ I- I ~ r~l ' ~ ~ , I ~ I ` ' ~ r; ; ,~~~1. ALL UNl!SED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB. ; I1' ~ ~ OEfK ~Ir., I r r't.i' ' ~ ` ~r! sr ~I. ~ ~ Y X 3 " +.I. r' SIDEWALK, AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. ~ H W N:'~ : , , , x ~ ; . v: ' , ~I . ~ ` 1 l 7 ry ~ i 1;;12. FLOOD .ZONE: ~ ~ ~ / ~ r ~,rL w ~'i r ~ L: 0,5 ~ I I~ - - R oLfT ou PsTER h THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE VE (14 & 15), AE (12), & X (OUT SIDE l ~ , f- I I I a / f _ - , I Y,~; ,r , I L ~ a9. lm I~ I~~ I ' ~ X / 1 ~ - • ~ LDCATIQ~ (TYP) n! ~ r ~r' - ~ mn~~}Lin n. ,,,.I I THE 500 YR: FLOOD PLAIN AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE . A ` I MAP NQ..12103C0106G, ~ . F v , y F i II f:ll I' ~ III ~ u "a . 1 j~3 _ _ , ~ ~ ~ ~i y , -X I I , •t I / ~ I ~ _,l ~ . _ _ " _ r . sTEP RISERS '':II ; I 13. A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED _ ~ - _ _ - / FFE - 22.00. I ~ ' , _ ,.Y~ -_:.a _ r ' s~:'r" ~ UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION. z r - 3s - : 1 r - - W , i , * r~;1;14,.. THERE ARE NO ENVIROMENTALLY, UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE LANDWARD OF SEAWALL & WETLAND LINE ~ ~ , - - - I ~ R . 8 ~ I n ~ I , z,, ..n,',u I Z ~ / X ..X YY, ~L~f ' . I' tN O :a' ~ I a O 24f ~ !lam ~ ~ W :I = I ~ - r g ~I,~ - °n, a, ~ ~n_, a / I_ I'I I~ I~ 2..,. ' , , h'-h ~ ' x ( 15. PARKING REQUIRED z a 'nom I + ~."1i t` tt X' _i c~ I -I' ;j,i3f 8' '4.$' r~ f~:. / `h , I~ 6_ _ I l X 2R~ ,1,06-b. .-t - ~ .O L 5 ,<<,:, ~,,L..~, _ rv ~ I , , I ~ ~ I-C I I : ~ , -I ~LIr ,I,, - , h g. v/ w . _ .9.2;5 ti Nli'iR; ~ly(~NOIF ~ I- 1- Z zs.as ~ I - ~h{ - ~ ATTACHED DWELLINGS UNITS 324 UNITS x 1.5 SPACES PER UNIT =486 SPACES v m r ; ~ „ ~ IX , - X x I . M _ d ~ ~~~fqqj~ h ~ I u~ f 1~, O ; ~:j_, } I rtl L ~ I Sf G;3 ~ ~fj N " _ ,I ~ ~,M rl. 1 C~,PA~I~Et~T RETAIL (18,893,00 SF)x(4 PER .1,000 GFA) _ 76 SPACES (i.qc , ~ I~~I ^ e / ~ ~ . ~ ~I~.~.A: ' t I _ X IE ;!;i:", ~ ~I Ii i ~ '7 Ci a I ' V , . , X X , , ~ , , o ~ W ~t J ~ a © n, m -w~ TOTAL _ 562 SPACES a a cn n rt . i, n. Y ;V., ~ rn ~.7 ,F' R h ~ r n.: 3 1 (I Y ~ '~I s ~ oECt. iJi,~C1 L. ' >fIP F vran'o- z, f. nr ~ pE tiECY (r, ~ , .r° F+~ ~ ~ JO 'I- '1.4;5 K ~ ~.16, SITE DATA TABLE, EXISTING: PROPOSED; REQUIRED: >I ~4" I ' STRIAE 4. '1.43 ~ ~ 9,39 HAkR150 l r i~l ~ ~ C",.ul ~ Elk r.. { ~ ~ ~ E . ~ 8 , _ DECK - ~ - l,, ~I. h., r~ h Xi,; 4 r~rt:. C i ' ~ r ~4~ -~,E • ~ I , , ~ 9f , N ~ ~ 3rss (r~.) ~.~+~'A:v TOTAL SITE AREA; 216,530.95 SF (4.97 AC} 216,530.95 SF (4,97 AC) N/A rv nl ~ VI E W ~ I G~, RIGHT-OF-WAY 20,170,93 SF 0,47 AC) 26,388.30. SF (0,60 AC) N/A Y Y m I I'_ r I m t I ~ ~'E 1~.. ~ RE.T ~ L & UMITS ~ ( zip I ~ .'I" i ~ ' :f, '~,0.5G ~ I y :P~I xnrr I < < ~ s f(d ~t;555.94 $F; { s TOTAL OPEN SPACE; 122,746.10 SF (2,81 AC) 109,462.91 SF (2,51,. AC) N/A ~ - . r r . PRIVACY , t y ~ ' syn ?X ~ .r ~ X t.~~ 3qT@~ k _ r. JQ_s I r,' , ~ i 5 WALL - / STEP RISERSFF~ a 32.5" ~ ~IGHT P LE Q ~ C, BUILDING FOOTPRINTS: 33,236,76 SF (OJ4 FAR) 56,679.00 SF (0.26_.FAR) N/A R n,:,:, ~ ~ ~ _ ^,SI , , ~1.3a~ OCATIO (TYP.),I-~ I ; ' - ~ i E. SIDEWALK/DECK/PAVED AREA: 67 952,38- SF 50 389.04 SF N/A a ~ r,; ' sass w . , ~ E l l Q, ~;i- ~'~8' ~T , ~ I F. TOTAL IIdPERVIOUS AREA: 101,189.14 SF (0.45 ISR) 107,068.04 SF (0.49 ISR) N/A ~ ~ I , ~n r~ .~1 v e. 1 t: , , 1 1 = ~ ' i , O • ~ i ~s~e~ ~ G. PARKING SPACES: ~ ~ M X , .,L11 I $ x > a' j 1 ~ _ I N,, ..r' N ' , ~ Q I ~ 'X G~~~ I ~ ISLANDNEW & HARRISON AUTOMATIC PARKING - 503 (324 UNITS}x o ~ z ~ ; ~ x~ X I t ' 3C-4 END OF ' U r. $ x I (1,5 SPACES PER UNIT) ~ ~ F u X ~ I _ i., ROADWAY SIGN I,:, 3' . . . . . \ Y _1. R ` ~ IW~ISON NL:A(~ OfFSIIE IMPROVEMENTS - 41 (OFF-SITE) n. ~ ' '''S' WISE ARCHITECTURAL (FORT HRRRISON & OSCEOLA) + (18,893,00 SF) ~ g ~ ~ ~ a I I ' GENERATOR .LOCATION,,: ~ SEE ARCH. PLANS FOR `''F r ~ ; - ~ I. 1 52 SPACES TOTAL 544 SPACES TOTAL .OFFICE/RETAIL o ~ ~ ~ I ~ONC 510 ALK do ° I H cn o ; . , ;l _ DETAILS) ~ " , \ r, _ ;;f I, , ' BANDING (SEE 1i'~ M;f 562 SPACES TOTAL w ~ o • ARCHITE TURAL PLANS ~ ~ ~ ~ mot. ~ . ~ f. s.~:.i. • ``a ' DR DET Ls ' H. RESIDENTIAL UNITS 4 45 HARRISON VILLAGE 4,91 AC x N _ ) ( ) ( ) i N SAW CUT Fi ~ ' ~ r EXISTING PAVEMENT ~ ' ~ II ~ ~ I ~ 279 (ISLAND VILLAGE) (50 UNITS/ACRE) - I ; ('I es7` 8 ~ i 6 UNITS TOTAL 324 UNITS TOTAL OFFICE/RETAIL o 0 , 6 SCREENED DUMPSTER ' ° , ' , - ENCLOSURE (SEE ARCHI. " ` ' PLANS FOR DETAILS) jr I TYP. 249 UNITS TOTAL N o Q I GRAPHIC SCALE ' . ,v ~ I 17. GUTTERS; DOWNSPOUTS, UTILITY BOXES, AND OTHER MISC. SITE FIXTURES. WILL BE PAINTED, m ,I ~ o ~e ~o ea { R~q~ SPECIAL. MARKING CROSSWALK >t r: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SCREENED, OR OTHERWISE. CONCEALED, OR .BLENDED IN BUILDING ARCHITECTURE o 6' SCREENED COMPACTOR' ~ PER FDOT INDEX X17346 (TYP.) ENCL05URE (SEE ARCH. ° 4,6T ~ 118, PEDISTRIAN SIDEWALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF CLEARWATER'S Z asT " ~ a'87 { REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS.- ~w>-u?-ozrn PLANS FOR DETAILS) VALLEY'GUTTER r, • ~ i'i M 1N FEET- 6" CONC. PAVEMENT X . " 19, OPEN SPACE/RECREATION IMPACT FEES ARE DUE PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS ~ 1 inch = 30 ft" ~ t X, t I I 6" STRAIGHT CURB I OF FINAL PLAT WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. fi z i I i ~ i ; (rrP.) I RR ~ ~ 20. EXISTING SITE AREA: 222.148.32 SF HAR ISON' i ~O,I~I~~~ w ~ ~ I : , , e g,'°r~ar* ~ 1"";C~~'~!jl~~.~~~~~!I~~~Pur~~•r~~l~I~ EXISTING .RIGHT OF WAY: 20.770.93 SF ~ . .;I ~ ~ STE _ STEP RISERS ' ~~rAIL , Be' , `y , PROPOSED SITE AREA: 216.530,95 SF Z~ 3;887.25 SF ' X; X , ~ ~.r: c~~ ~ ~ - FFE,b31.5 PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY: 26.388,30 SF ~ . i.. N;' ~ - ~ w ` (2} H.. RAMPS W/ TRUNCATED ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ < ~ DOM PER FDOT INDEX. 4'304 ~ ~ a , .dF~ iA,yi I (2) W14-1 "DEAD END" ~ r (TYP.) ~ ro _ ~Sr~~r , ,__o SIGNS i r ~ t~ I ` S ~ ~G ~ JUN 49 20~ _ ~ , ~ , y ` "~+d Jnt o O _ { VJ'1 ~ E~ ~ PIANN ~ z° w ' ~ n1s !pPJri ru,;.: - 111~,Y !"nhdFlf, ' ''x. -',r t?",1 l_ E6,34 -I it 1'.. _i f9H4~1_~ erne e,nu" k+ rlw„~,_ ~ DRAWN BY. RJM soh r (2) 2Dx20::;SIGHT VI B,IUTY,,;~"' , ;e;- ,i.us,, , _ ~ ~ ~ ~ , (1} 20' 20 INTERSECTION 97.1. Lli).'n.n. a.vr f.vp i (FD p; r 23. r7 SAW CUT de MATCH (1) 24 STOP BAR r l E , L (t (roTRIANGLE ~TYPj) ' ! t LTYPICAL _._,--EXISTING PAVEMENT.--CURB,._. hJ - JONES STREET Mp~l)1 ~C d 1 SIDEW(~LK, & GRADES (TYP,) IMPRGVEM r61 ~G.;x6 7.3L' ?fl. u r 79.45 E. = 2. r, ,L; I 40 R1W OF CLEAR I.. F LOCA110N VISIBILI TRIAIGLE (TYP ) chECK 6Y: Ktc n~ .JONES STREET_,ROA~LIGHT POLE I ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 IMPROVEMENTS BY THE CITY PERMIT SET ONLY OF CLEAR.WATER (1 6`~ HITECTI~i~A6+PAVEMENT TYP.) h.,3 `/.11.91. ii 1 ?F ~ t J.l.cl _9.1G I ; ~ ! - ECH RI ANS FOR DE AILS) SHEET ~I: t9.Ci6 SI}.i9. c ±,.t a zSu2i ZC ? .5 { Z9.4'r' SPECIAL N SPECIAL MARKING CROSSWALK NE: it 7704 at.6~ 1 ~.q.. t+ - ~ f; F,~ U . 1G S1 PER DGT F 2' fl"`3U.34 CAl'CII BASIN .l SIA'6 - ( PER FDOTt1NbEX X17348 (TYP.. F 26 .92 30-85 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A OC I 1? 09 4 aLUfi 1- L 1 ,41 .m ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 w t', I ~ i ~~x y i ~ ~ 1 g y If ~ 9 " ) ! ~ i -I~ ~ &i ~ +31.16 ~~yyy , ~ ~3 - . ~ n.u, c i LLi ~ om ~ ;:i n '9 cic c ~ uci~^ Ir 1 .1Iv`: 4 d' } i s L I I i ~ ~ I Tel WM , w:r., CW. ~ {I I , a f' I 1 i NITA~Y kNIi~LE ~ ~ ~ ,I ~ ~I ~I i 1 1 r 1~1 i4 I 1! 2ti F-~.. ~1'Ill I ~I r~ ~ o ~1CP RIJtINI~\G ~ l I ~ ~ i " - ; k' ~ ' - ~;11't TYPE "D" INLET i6 '';,tt' 11'd.J unNl:o~E ~ro~ 24.76 - Iw'st ~ GRATE=27:6 „ + I ~ . _ _ . • ~/3 R ~ !i i ._L__..-...- - . . _ i I;.I. _ _ - . _ _ ,•i~rlo Eli rsso ! U~I~ I,I ! , E _ i. , - ~ ~ ~ ~ 21.2 ~ ~ ;I~ C ~ r 1~~I 't ~ 55 iR i . Sa.6E ~,;Y,o.r,1 ?III I J _-TEF1f~ORAR1'~5~ FENCE /U ~ ~ ~ ~~I I - " / 17.9 I t -•i ~ ~ ~ ` i•_ 2795 ~ i1~6 i ~ " ;n'.fr~r' ~ ~s; ~0 ~ _ I gala LOCA110N (Tl~':~ I~~ ~ M ~ ~ ` ~ I I ~ / ~ti' r7 k ^ ! i -sI~;ST RM M,H,L#t7 ~ ~ •,c;~ _ -'-7 s~aftl,;r•`I I„1~~~I+oLE ~ GEORGIA STREET 9 21.0 r 1,2;2;; a 1 ~1~ RIM ~ 31 1 I, ~ a 4s ~.-1 40' RIW E „t',~ 1r 17.75 r':ISTORM M•H. 19 STORM M:H. X18 _ ~ L.:'"(F)INN='23,4, ~~1 28.0 MATCH E IST!`tCRADE s 30,70 ~-1~31.1fi ~ ~I~ ~ ~ i _t.; ; 30,0 ) X'• RIM = 25:0 ~ RIM ~r4~,Q'1 ~~;iWf~?FF i ' N ^ N f V+'25.4 t~E~ i_ 25.?4 30.0 :,6S,3o:6st,.5; GRAPHIC SCALE ~ t~j'I,~ I in~ n ~ 1 ~ TYPE "D" INLET (~20 ~ ~ h~,1 ><tc, ~ . , _ - INN=21.fi 2:;. 21.2 (F)INN=22.7 i.91 ~ 'o v '1• , ao )7^ IE W IN41~22@.ht_---... If 1~.-2r~ I GRATE=14.5., ~ x`=- X--~ 17.95 ~ WINS=22: P - 278 " O , ~ 8 ~ 4 so o ,e ao eo r ~11 ( I INN=10.5 , x r _ ~ ?s ` ~ I L r ~ _ ~ f as I. . i I-?1+.G9 2 iCv'r 1111.j1.54 26.55 33 2 iU:l 1 ~ , ~ ~ , ,r.. , v K~ - f~ 2J.,1 _ - { , µ c " ~~3~~2 ;0:~ ii.I1 ~ _ _ ~ a11~ I ~ I E' " 1 a'ti6 .'12" Y, ~fa~ :1 . ,-~<< ~ 14.11'41.~iC~. "'~/-PLIr~'1.5~.~ .U.~"i.~)IUs~'~2617 ,26.88 +"g217 ~ ~F58 _ - ri , •0 14.6 ~ xl4 ~ ~ J - - ` °u- - _ 32.2. ~ ~ ~ i ,F ~ - - ~ , `I - J .9~i :r'~' a~[. ' c .65 ~t Lr. FG ~ .,?.'a,3 r FOP 1" ~ 32.2 - €r 'I ~ + o ~ unj 26.23+ .'12° ~i," l0U +ki i"a';i1:'I' F v: 0.2' N 28.55 26,7 ~ 2 ,i 1.1 I (IN FEET) ~ ~ 31.5 ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ;IP, I ' 14.6 ~ + - Ir, • ~ , " r~ ~ )(11^ " ~"BLF;`8 "PVC ~ ~ _ _ Y . r 8LF-18 R 4LF-18 RC 32.4 ..I ~ j A~Ii.7 c`v i inch = 30 it, ~ If~ ! ~ ~ t I f; 14,0 s o..' ~ 76LF- " ~ E ~ 3 = rp STRI . ~ ~ I ~ 30 H. DPE If ~ j,. 8~0 ` ~ ~ [ ~ 1 32 E • D" INLET"` 15 RA11~3 r~ K , ~ ~I 3 5 ~ 32,5 I X7,0 ~ ~ ~i ~ I', ' I I~'s~l 28:55 ,r r; I , ~„It<~ ~ ....22,5 ` F 31.4 ~ :r . 30,9 `31.1 TYP ~ r 1 DR 30,f: 3 .5 - ' 11 m i` ~S5 RATE=28.35 LP ~ N FlI~ t ~U-17' ~ ~ 14L -8" PVC DEDK 1. ~ 2. ' - (F)INN=24,1 TYPE. D '-INLET ~2 v _ ~I i ~5" ~ ! , - ID dci f. 'T ~ .I r i 8"• ~QDF - 31.1 _ 19LF- ~ it ~ 12 i ~ C ~ ,1. • ~ - r ~ , ' DR~FPL (S)INN-24.1. " ~f;• L INLET #2'H RISON ~ ~ w ~P ~ ,I` I i'' ~ I'~-~-, r a IU iP. r ~ DE „ t CK ISrILD i+ i 6rPVC )N X115 _ DECIV ~ ~ I ' ` r1 I' ~ ' M ~l I c ~ 29 ,:1~ , 3, 7.25 12°j'~2 ,r. , P.~: '4.64 , ~ J.F- u~~,:+b,~ ~ 3U.02~ >z I r II e~ 3174 ~j' l I' _ 7.9:74 29.II I Py • „F E - 3 29:8 ` r~" =F E=.32,5. it > 1.3D I, I 158'-0" MIRAGRID SEGMENTAL ~ r~ 'I=' ' r, 31,5 1v; , 32;'46 3 X12 14.9: , 31.6 RETAINING WALL OR EOUIVALENT ~ ~ ~ I=D;• _ ~ C , E6 r ~ 32,5 32,46 ~ - ~ i .PER MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS ~ ~-B j J-~; ~ ~ I ' ~ rvvl ~ ~ 31.4 ~ ~ "l~ a LEGEND ; 4~i~t~' N ~ t~ SSA , ~ Yf' ~ ~ ~ N ~ ti~ ~ ~ •I, ~ ~ ~ o xX~ ~'f _ I: a' iaw ~ - ti _a?e,a 31.6 31.2 LA5 vOUND 3~ +~3 r ~ ~ ucr~ .F~ ~ F~.f t'OND d ~ - rr ~ ^G~, ~ ~ ~ ~ TYP TYPICAL tr I +v 31.2 ~ Qi p~ T 10~ 2 ~ ~ X ~ ;i v - _ - - - - - . ~ • I 31,'~ E ~ ~ ~q ~ `ppp/~ 'y M kf! S¢t~ 29. .11, ICJ. u si~ v ~ ~ , ~ ~2,E~ ~ ' a.2 ~ , 7j _ - - .31.0 31.0 32.x. 1e FFE = 21.00 r-- ~ 31.96 ~ ~ RnMP - : A • • ~ v ' ~ E "D" INLET f'# ,III l~~t=~k ~ ATE=3.2 + S,sa PROPOSED GRADE @ , S ~J I , ~ 31.88 ? ~ 3 , ~ , .:i, ~ , - / 1K~7' +i p Ftrcnul 1 ~ 31 90 - I 1`+ 32.5 I v=2~,o i_A - - _ c 3:t:30 I ~ X . X ~ , ~ _ ~ I r r 0~3 < ~ ~ ~xo.oo) EXISTING GRADE E Z ~ a r ,1 (C STORM H. X21 14. .X x 6 ` x: ~ , ~ U ~ - - ~ ~ ' , ' •I i-%. ~J I RIM = 14.2 ! t -x,„' 21:3 ? ~n 4.31.1 - ~ : a I ~ EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED W ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1.C.~arr^~ X' U) (N~~V=10.2 ,s DECK I) - ~ Jrll 11 . ,.h Ir ;,Ir, ~ H-D ~ DF.CX DECK DECH I ~ r; R.A, ~ ~ 32.46 yN aUf~c~ C~~~ (NE INN=1o.2 ~ DEgf' - - ~ ~ = r-~-~-= x `a, r. ~ u i~'} 21.3 ~ 21.3 ~4; . , 4,+ ~ rn ~ ~ v~~l ~ ~ E li r( - 30,0 1 f. ~ r ~ ~ ' r \v~~ SILT FENCE AND FLOATING ~ a w IO M M , . , ~ 16LF 8" PVC , , ~ , • ~ . ~ 4 ~ I. I I ~ a / ~ ~ r.~ I. I ~ a „s N ~ r , ~ ( - 1 ~ - 4 r-~ i ' 32.0 ' ~ ~ M ~ E-I , ~ WOODEN WALKWAY TYP. ~ Da _ i~~ ~ ~,:a°- a ~ ~ ( ) 21.1 , ~ ~ ~ at ~ - - - ~ rs~ Os [~d d:~' I I i~ I" ~ti.e Nn% ~ I 'L -=1 • ( D~1~°'~° 3~ ~ ~ ~"C'J~a~ a`T~,,) ,yn r~V" t~vr ~ ~~o~,, DI~•• • 21.6 r•. I. I,- I i (0 ~-f ~ `t`. f. !}Sv~~ ~ >f.~J~~~nt:,m,s..,. .w„r~~k -r .r 31:90 'HARRIS N: ~ ' ~ 7YP `~D" INLET ~ r A ~ W dRRI$ N ~ ~ I~= 7, 15 N ~ M ~ O . fi~ 21•.9 , 44..:. `1 tai.?: i ~ I ~ ~ • . ~C ~ - ; ~ ~ I r • ~ 219 ~ I I ~ILLAG i It ~ o}tlR PUV ffR Y ~ I V - ~ ~ ~'I~, " ^ti _ awe VILLAG ~ ~ ~ ~..I { Dfi. 1 1 ( _ RET IL$U I1 • MES 29 ~ - I LAND VIEVV _ - cX` ~ ~ _ , . I RET~ IL $ U ITS U ' ~ I ~ ~ t, t.• ~ 1 11AA9i62 F / ` ti INN=10,00;1 ~ • 22.0 22.0 • ; ~ ~ . ~ _ l , _ _ i~ j I a , . ~ ~ ~ =PARKING GARAGE I,; F' E,, S' ~ ~ I X:,; MES x'28 : i. ~ ~ ~r , , &A TACHED UNITS ~ ~ ~,,~!as.e2~F, 32,46 M~1 PAVING GRADI ~ o z ~ F ~ t~ 5 ~ ~ ; ~ I NG AND DRAINAGE NOTES. w ~ i INN=10.00 ~ ~ ' • ~,~i2,., _ ~ i 1..30:0- - . ,123.87 SF. ;p;=. ~ y ~X , M - ~ a I WEIR ELEV 13,6 ~ ~2 Rn(IP _ GEOWEB CELLULAR CONFlNEMENT ~ , ~ ~ I ~ FFE'='32.00: , -`s' ~i'•a; ~ TYPE "D" INLET; ~ 1. SEE GENERAL NOTES SHEET AND DEMOLITION FOR EROSION AND SILTATION ~ ~ U INLET ~ E W/ FIBERGLASS I I I , r- ~ ~ SYSTEM OR EQUIVALENT WITH ~ - - 22,0 ~ 22:0'.• I 29' 4'~ ~ t,,;r t ' - - ~-_-'mot r ``w' 4 % ~Z 130.2 • ~ ~~-I~m3D 00.__I I SKI MER - ~ l' ~ , 1. s - 31.45 7x, ~ L 30.2 ~ (W)INV-26.65 _ Q9q._ JI U ~ 3; F a„; CONTROL ALONG WITH GENERAL NOTES. 6.65 I ~ U rn BAHIA SOD PER MANUFACTURER'S " I r - i `C 1 I ~ , LP ' I ' • . . ; REQUIREMENT - 2 9 '4, ~ , - ~ ~ v Ir r • a ~ 2. SEE SITE PLAN/HORIZONTAL CONTROL SHEET FOR SITE DATA. • Y r, c a " , (r i ; , c J i'• ~ 1 ~ I o ~ o POOL ~ ~ ¢ ::t;' ,1 j 6;F TYPE: D" INLET ~3 ~ d - _ - ~ 4LF~ 1 RC w ' ! w ~ ~ - ~ ~ R~,.., ~ GR TE-30,0 ~ 1, • _ - p , ~ 1, q- ,r < z ~ - f In I ; W ~a , N ~ Y !.7.1 ~ ~Ib , ~ - - - (N)I V=26 53 s~) ,34 , y_ _ 16LF-8° PVC • • ~ r , , , ~Y,; / n x x...~..- 9; Ix ~ , - (E)I V 2653` ,~w ~ 2y'i30.2 r, 1 we • ; ~ • I _ N ~ o - ± 3. SEE BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR TEMPORARY BENCH x ~ ~ y~, 5.J1~~'St~i1 ~ 1 • ? s" ~ ; , • 1 -~-z i ~ r ~t :S . 1 I,.. / s ` - •..,22:0•- ,tl, ~ - - ra:n, I l ~ ! I LL .MARK (TBM) LOCATIONS. r~ f (2)J COURSES ~ RnUP ~ ' I .7 ~ r I ~ . -=T 1-' ' ~ ~ ~ OF~SAND MES #26 „ - - - u 1 y . i, ~ ~ I ~.lu ( ltr3i it ti ~ I r ~ I' ~4 ~ ro ~ 1 ~ I,. 3z 46 I M^,,; o Z ~ 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED 14JV CEM!!NT BAGS INN 10:0 ~ MES #27 - , . _ I I : 1 h' ~ _ ~8 )..~li ~ ~ I o r ~ I, ~ A 1,-l~~" ,~:_r`~ Dhr 9 (r~~'w y,, ~ _,~r INN-10.00 ,I, .r , If;IJCItJRE ~'i' - ~z_ _ - r-~ Li.lp o~' : I ` ~ ~ n. Nm IN THE LATEST EDITION OF THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS MANUAL ) . ~ ~ - 22:0. - ~ : 29.0, ^a . r4 1.91 / S~lJT '1~~:'>>.~ iF,%S i X71? - 2E2270 ~ 6~i '`i N-A 1 Jo--sI '23 ~ ..r~~ ~ - - - - r r J Rl.,-- a2•o . ~ I-I I ~ ~ , ~ ~M M PREPARED BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS, ~ ~ RlAN1FA x x ~ 31•sa - 14° ` : ~ i~ -0l' $1~8 .l ~ ~ I ~ 219 :'tr-. `1,8' I ~ ~ aRATE~115LET Z ,2 ~ - r5 31'i2 31:4' W • f . , r X22 / 8„ R t ~ ( v >*Ee I~r ~ ' 2TS ; ~ , - I- d- r ~ , Q •'i' , U r ) GtV r,: t ~I C.:rl~?i1 ,7 --HP,1 I'9•! r , f; ~ ~ ~ ~ I v=2~o1 a M 5. FLOOD ZONE: ~ ' 1~1 ` 1• a f'I (ri ~ Q = D Y1 0 >?12 r ~ I U) ~i: 6-i ~,r, 0 , ~ r ~ t 'h ~ i5 28 9 ' ~ 32:b ~ I ,~~A ~ ° ~ ~~1-~ THIS PROPERTY DIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE °VE (14 & 15), AE (12), & X (OUT SIDE ~ ~ ~ 6~ j ?t> 21.1 1 ;'3 - .1.;815 SIR _ - _ 1 E D IN T ~5 31:0 31~ za.~ a ~a, -t ~..8" nlDl•'J5" ,t. ~ e -1U'T,F~9~ ~ J = ~ X" ~ ti WI[ ~ 2rS X ~ ~ F R t/z" 4 i N tc, ro 13 ~ 7 ~ - - _ ~ _ i c~ 2' ~ ~ ~ ~ MAP N0. 12103C0106G. FBI ~ ~ ~ ~t! ~ \ 1 • ,~~r. , ~ ~ 21jt3 3D.0 ~i, I . • ,I_ , ~ '1 N r ~ N !nw \ y J t N }-?'i•''` - S)IN;V. UR tL ~tl ~ :I. ~ . : ' ~ Fo~NT1N 2.0 ~ MMM THE 500 YR. FLOOD PLAIN AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE ~ E - INLET 1~„ ~ H ~ 21:3 ' ~ ~ rl IL ~ r iy 1b:76 ~ . ..t.os 2.88 \ ~ _ DECK ~ , . ` ~ ~ ~ _ , / 28.) . ~.1 lt; r~ DECK ~ a:.~ • i ~ ~ 3 I uJ `w . - - - e r., J6-3 \ D CK5 ~ 1 ' DECK _ 7 ,.76 .9.29 7-, 28.: ~ ~ ~ - G~ i s ~ ~ W IL - ?8.83 28. ~ 1 c ~ ~ ~ I v 2%0.5 ~ 6, ALL DISTURBEG~AREAS WITH IN R-O-W SHALL BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED. ~ N~ n ~ v.~ ) 2H.99 \ I , . . ~ ~ 1 ~ ^ J , ~ ~ I I J ~ 3-r ~ ~ ~ r I M~ ' ~32'S ~TM ~ m ~ ~m 7. STORM PIPES IN THE CITY'S R-O-W SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITY OF ~ E-~ ~ I: ; ~ ~C UBHOUSE~ ~ ; ,1.1 •31,15 ~ ,r~ . - ,,i 12LF-8 PVC w 14,5 k : ~ ,~-p - , Im 39 90 50.65; i r, dU~2 a F; a, 6 I '-6`-~„ 30.85 4 ~ r 1il}, ' "i~ ~,,;f~ " , ~ ~ + CLEARWATER'S STANDARDS. ~ ~ ~ -~-i-A ~ ill ~ E~(~~vui ' I X 2DLF,a" PVc / a I~ M ~ , , ,I ~ I ' ~ , , , ~:4J , ' 9 Pvc , 3 ME '31 5 LET $ ROOF DRAINAGE WILL BE CONVEYED TO STORMWATER PONDS BY INTERNAL ~ / I ~ [I ~ I r_-~1~. 1-~----'--=- - ~ - ~ ~ LF-18 RC ~ TYPE!"D",INLET: 'D",INLET I v=2~.o r ~ ROOF DRAINS: INTERNAL GRASSED/LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE GRADED Q,' ~ ,rl~/ ~ ~ ~10' ~FE = 22.00:.. i; r - - _ i , I r • ~ . N GR •~~30.45 r ~:'t _ ;7;~ ~ at 14.0 ° MIN ' - r-r-- x1.,1 ~'a WI - 8$ . .r.. „ , 1 -30.45 ~ 32.4s s2_ ;6 TO STORMWATER `PONDS. W ~ H ~ , r ~ v~ r v _ - ~ I 131.96: . r r ~a ~ ~ LJ 2.91 ~ f,.~: ~ R8 ~ ~ w_ ~ _ W fly - - - _ _ _ EROSION CONTROL MEASURES NOTE. F ~ ~ ~ r Lil Q Jn-I r, ~ N I _ rr nx I ; ~ t c~- --_-•r,.-_ ~ _ _ 29.~, ,~k~~ M r y ~ ~ J ~ ~ ' y od ~ O'~ j'r1 I :N, i~l I X7 , i25ff1 11/~ 3. 29.i 19.1E 'i ~ . ~ U ~ Q O X~ ~ . ~Y 1n61HO1. •^-.M REQUIRED EROSION CONITROL MEASURES MUST REMAIN INTACT THROUGHOUT. w • D:9241R 1~,1D L1 ~ ? _ - ~ ~ C _ :It, , ~ .,K _ t _ a5 I ,1 - ~ , s _ u , -.'x - r _ J,F )0( ~ ~ . .n 13tt:~ n z::..;I 1, 2;, ~~:io~ 010. 1 •d- ~ , ' > ~ y ' ~ I, ~=s- 2s~1~7a CONSTRUCTION. FAILURE TO INSTALL OR PROPERLY MAINTAIN THESE ~ ~ Z - ~u K : - , I• ~I y - J o 2n.,p ~ , ,~~'i` 14,7 r ) _I,. w r lL ~ `'i' F ~ ,1 ~ :,vti ~ /v/1L,'~/Fir ~~i! Ii ~ _ 1 r.~ 21.',i ~ `V --f : - oa K - ( 4~~ / ~ X : r, 8" R OF`~DRAIN PLUG (TYP.} p~ ~ ~ ; ~n - ~2~ ~ , ~ f - - + 313 { i_ ~ ~±LI~ ~.2a - . 9 _.-r_..._.---_~_. a ~ > S IE = 2647 = BARRICADES WILL RESULT IN ENFORCEMENT ACTION WHICH MAY INCLUDE w w I- ~ . - - = 3 , ti 'C. , , r ' d 'a ~ s ~ ~I~ ~'~(E ,CITATIONS, AS PROVIDED BY CHAPTERS 40D-4 AND 40D-40, F.A.C. R ~ r, DECK ~ ~rcr r .a9mu . T , i'1 3Q - ,,,s , ~ - yr x ~ E ~ °q" ~ I JF -3,.5;- , vv ~ tJr~ O.n3 ~H~ RISO `b:; J (\I ` n'.'I ~ t' ~ DECK;t-" :~~'DEtiN a l f t)ECI( S' - I I r :1 r ~ t r 30. ~ y h - J :y - ~ fJ~ q - - H Rlso U `a1.3s o.. _ ;INITIATION OF CIVIL PENALTY PROCEDURES PURSUANT TO SECTION a d N n I`~ O, . _ : ~-r• DECD( , n H i ti~i r I,G~f.: 'X r ~ .6ii.U5 .1, c,1 ~ r. ~}i.. ~ . . P , ~ . u i - ~ V LAG - J i" ~ v.~-~ I ~ I • _ r I ~ ~ 31.4 9G ',3 (0 ~ - - - - - ~ ~ r •a` ~ } ~ x 31,4 ~ o1¢K - I DES, L. ~ 1=~I~EfiA L l~ U ITI ~I r~3.129, F.A.C„ CAN RESULT IN A PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED X10,000 n ~ r.~~i~r.~ r ~ , ~ . {>_i,: ~ _ - - 9:1 594: F'. g>~Efi ILS~ur~ITS 32 as PER OFFENSE WITH EACH DATE DURING WHICH SUCH VIOLATION OCCURS r, 1 , : ' r 31.4 I x ,i ,fir i T -,;95LF-30" HDPE x 139LF-30" HDPE 7:, _ 125LF=24" RCP ~ , ~ ~ 47LF-8" PV I FF : 3Z~ . 7 .~~~~.5sa~~ ~ ~ • ~ CONSTITUTING A SEPARATE OFFENSE. Y Y m FF ~ 32~ - ? STORM M;H2~24 _ , t.. STQRM M H ~'7 s . - C 8° PLUG TYP , RIM=14.20 ~ - , ~ ~ :~M~_ ORI~IN~L 3 (TYP,) U ~tl, ~ 151F-8':,.PVC :'tl 5LF-8".;PVC e ~ - - ~ , r.~, ( _ I:~1 ~ ~ ~ INN=10.4 ~ ~ ; r.. u - , ~ ELEV 30.94 J - ~ , - ~ , i ~ STORM M.H. ~f22 ~ - ~ - - - > " 1 ,d 'xx i 1~1 f' I I 3 ~,F I, 1 x 7 ~ RIM 30:0 fT I I~ !l q I p_~ C1. r (S I~NV-14:26 ~ :;g : s ~ INN=18,70 S. ~ i i 32;0 I T~YP~c315LET 9~ ~ Z . - ' i V 24 26 , • v ~ x- - - ~ E INN=25.10 ~~~31.35 : r x. ter. ) rl INV=27.D~ rr~~ STORMWATER CALCULATIONS W - ~ ~ s.. 19 0 c ST M M.H, #23 - i _ - _ _ _ - 25 0 ~ HP i b r , a; RIM 29.0 r_ ~ ; ~ i ~ ~ '1~ ~ o _ ~ INN=13.75 x • 1 - x i" ~ • I,-, 1 , v~, ~ TREATMENT REQUIRED: (0(5.74 AC) = 0,359 AC OR 15.627.15 CU-FT I~ " - - - - ,x 17.0' ...1 ;.,y ; ~ r ~ in;7i . ~ 1~•I ~ ~ 25.0 I n% I Lea ~ 32,4s ' (8010.95 SF ~ I~, + ~c,Z1~ taw +°1 ) (4 FT) I ~ TREATMENT PROVIDED: ~ ~ F • r- - 's 5'_NGI`rl_r_:,,1 ~ b 31;15 - - - - - I~ ; ~ ~i uia ~ 1 '=r' €I: , I %L,,Lr). AUL)IlhrhJ i',- „ ' = 17,583.32 CU-FT FROM ELEV 10.0 TO 14.0 " a , . , t • ~ t r ~ ~.r r-. i6 b, .?r,.7! II. I( I IJ ~t % h =;I ~ rli ' S ~ _ , a IY v v ..,.e. I ~ > I;' .,o , 1 I^l~all~::... I .,ri 1'~ „r , ~ , ;1.56' ~i ~ r1il' p~- IC p sl:,h c ,,v :1 z ,'r J.: "1~ -r.~ h 4 x.1111 L':~iC 11111, i~(,~-,~F ~.,I h; r,~, ~ J.,:. o ~ p WEIR ELEVATION: ,,,Z )(4' DEEP) + 10 FT. = 13.56 FT ~ > v. 1 a ` ~ ~ ) 7 MATCH EXIST. PAVEMENT.'`) I U `'1 1 it I •1}'s~)~, ~ 42~ w w `I ? ~ o ru I' ' ' • `GRADE TO PROPOSED STABILIZED ~ , sps,l l ~ -i1 C9 ' ` - .-e.. , v . ~rt - ,J ~ 00 .ice„ 1... a ~ , S I I_ GRASS DRIVE D1,66 ~ . ~n 32, 5 . > _ W ~ L, ~ J q"' ('A t;.y ur, C;~ ~ N .31.2 G7'.. ,w _ _ L.._ I ,U Y U! „~(;p ~ a FIBERGLASS SKIMMER (z ~ w, r~ i~''t,r - ~.r.o,I r I I 11.._4 ~r.9 _,nrl~ ~ L, s~~~ 31. 1 LTG ~ ~ t ~ o o ~ _ 31.0 11 ru 2 Sj r ylrv ~ I ~ ~ 'P. - 28.9-- i .V~~V s32 2113 N N O Q I ,y r _ M o I r, 31,5 ~ 51:~~ ~ Fi- 1 e v~ .`7`,u ~ I ti G , P~' T I ~1 ' M M M.~ ~ O O k a'` t. ~ I 30.?i . z, `4'SI~ ~ ELEV 14.0 Is'OF BANK ..I'.5~ ~ , .0%4 ..LSJ ~ v' 30.5 ;k~50.fiu ~ T~~ ~ ~ ~ Z , 2S ;r-, ~ ' ' ~ I ~ ~9A I ~ ~ so.7a TYPE D INLET 24 STABILIZED . s,~, ~ ' '32;5 E~D INIEr~e I T.O.B.= 4.0 ~ ~W>-y-ozN NLET ~6 ~ RATE= ,5 I w ~ ) ~ ~ LDT 1 u~, ~ !_UT 2 µa~) .dui h r,Rnn I'~LI:+ 'CRATE=29 36 • . NAR IS01 ~ FIB: I CLASS SKIMMER 1((~. - ~ , 38 NAR ISON ~ ~ I V=27. ~ ACCESS 3 ~ • , ~ E3t OC1(2 ~ ti ; :a Vii' BLUCI( ~ '1NL t o.2y ~ ~ IL , P ~i a - , ,r;MS~~ F#5 17,76 IC f~ o nod i,~.. - ~ ~ - I G. TE= 6: ~ ~,.~~LP~~ _ ' $ PVC'R00 .'DRAIN: .AIL' It. QMME aAL.` laz ~ ~ ~ I 00 DRAIN AID, I w L N Ie - 19.34 JONES SUDDIVI510N OF -7.79 DT Da 1' c..r r l t~ 1s~N ~ ~ I ~ a, 1~ ~ (N INN=25.24 ~ ~ 29 2 325 , 25 S RIM la.... 1s.an u, o us~i r Ir. = u.~s (ss" Rcf') (hl NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO _ , I :_~f~E ~32s ~ ~ 3'6 W I 4 WEIR ELEVATION=13.60 I 06 SIG = 19.43, - N ^ ~ I r.,,7 (FP ' c. ( INN-25.34 18 ~R -'fFE 32,, ~}C ~ ~ N, ~ ~ ~a ~ o:~ CLEARWAl-ER FARDOR P.B. t . t~ 30t6~ ~ ' 32 5 I w I ~ 32:5 32.0 I ~ y Il~ ~ - + ~a~ T ~ ~ 9r :,9.7 .~.92~ r` vu ~ ; G.11~;~, HILLSBOROUGH COUNT,2..., w.7o ~ ~ :y~ ^ y ~ `3 I ~ ~ , ~~iU.E 0.01 c: y . ~ FALL STRUOTURE .1, ~ i . ),s.~, .,R6b ~ - .qr c5.3J~ I ~ ~ SO.EB J.. - - N~~I o G w ~a y ~ J ..,(.31 1-i;i.5n i i -Y ~ ~ ~ / ~~SUS7. h 32.2 `~J ',kC ~ 1,dAhl} 1L , C? . ~'I' rv. ~15, I~ ~l , N w, _ " ti. 7.5.;r c• .h. % ~ ~~~29.8 ~1:DD ai I9. - ~ ti • 71 ~ Op ~ ~ 32.2 M ~ ~ ~ 11VEIR DETAIL o0 9^ . ,,..79 ~ ~ 8 - - a _ 11'V _ ----err--- ~ W •_-r . ~ ~ wM ly - - - 25.03 Ulf` u1-....._ -E<.t-a --~=f- • - '~92' RAP ~27;t.r - - 2IiCu-.-._..- _ I F ,D ( - vn-_- ~ N.T.S. ~ ~ N 1 _ f~l ~"k: (:OMFLICT HOX VJ~ 6Ei° (iCP - - I ,3i P O N D B O TT-O M - 2,1.721'--~ V. ~vyl, 5TURP,1 MAMh , 1~ t- ~-;;o' IOPJE~;Lr~!,F~e, - - uIRMI_nrr MATCH EXIST. DE - ! 32.2 ss" RcP 32.2 I- m ST°~',, ti,n~l"°`E JUN 0 9 2005 Z W - ~ STORE.; MMANfIULF ~ ,1rIK1`T, f\L~y~jy Y MAIdI10LE fi!M EL = 3( 4 ELEV-10.0 _ ! ~ ItIM - 'L5.34 a ~1~29:84 RIM EL ~ 50.5530.52 I:IE = 119 R!M EL = 34.23 ? I: IE = 1194 ~aG/ 31.06, - L u~ 1 .v •H2zar I ,~•,(UND~R C~N~STRIJC~ION,~. fII Ltp w/ (71Rt + , -E., ~ ~t: _ .~.o~ 14.75 O o w IE = tLS1 1 %5,69 ! If: - ;S.~i RECLAIMED WATER ~ - O ° w IE = 1 Lse ~ +3os7 41.491 DRAWN BY: RJM r ~ n, euu,~ . a nFVFI (~PMENT Stl(S - r'. J I _ MEfLf2 IN~IO; / 1 9 vu CHECK BY. KEZ '23 1 ,5, Z X30 2;is~ 40 RIW . t t ~,.r SECTION A-A 27.27 ~ss F _ 3099:1- 30.56 ORIGINAL DATE; 04.15.05 7 }9 of sy t,~, y ~ , ar--- ~ r 3h,i'f 30.26 - 6 SANVARY MAN!10LE NC - J 27.04 t. PERMIT SET ONLY SHEET N.T.S.` ~4 }(11f 0.-0~ 130.93 RM C~ t ul BOG > _ f r it F E IE 27.04 h. 11fi E. IE = 7.692 31.08 S 16 27.09 0~ I rn 31.06 SF 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r~til. M 5 OF 12 nN fi0 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 -ti ~ ; [YI ':5 1. 5 SAN. M.H. IP6 n Sr NIT Y ANI4~ ' l ;'.a ' CONSTRUCT 2" BLOWOFF RIM =27.42 ~1 } STORM/SEWER CROSSING (SE)INV =15.53 I SAW CUT, REMOVE, & REMOVE, dt ij R~ I,31u• ~ ~ s AT END OF 4" W.M, TO REMAIN SAN TOP=18.3,18.2 ) (S)INN - 7.47 ROP';, REPLACE EXISTING ASPHALT ;r STORM BOTTOM-25.0 I W INN =15.43 ~:'c a z 1 t;'.r" °f. EXISTING ASPHALT 5t IE-= 2 .25 C^ ~R a I o' VCfj R,J rlLV , , °f. _ Who 7 RU AN fN.E: 'pp ~ ~ y o~~ I nl ,,w nr lc . i EXISTING FlRE HYDRANT ° _ ~ " ' i _ ~ 'i s ~ ,w5i .,I _ I "1 ~ ~ I r l ~~l ,6 x6 TAPPING SLF~E ` ;I;, PLUG EXIST. SOOTH INVi ~~1 J~.L_._.-._..._ ~ 11.(1)6 1DIP„.WATER SERVI~F :ry- . __&-VAL _ I F , AND CONSTRUCT-NEW ' is . PING E~ _ XI ~ ~ (1) METER dc:BACK FLOW PR VEN1F~tr _ --INN-= 22,00(SW) ~ ~ P.'X - rr CO TACT CLEARW GAS 1 - „ Y _ T _ r r SEt BY CITY I JK t* 2~:h , 1 - - cLEARwqq ~ GAS TO RELGCATE_ :;o,~n ~I GRAPHIC `SCALE. I' JI ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 1 t~1i ~ % °A~1 bGNNECT NE BSS AT-~ s ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ .r L r I ' r 7).41 V) _ ~ ' ' ~ rt° LOCATION i0 EXIST. GAS MAI IECT NEVNB~S-AT APPRONAC. TE ~ It;• F' ~ _a.-- `'s 4~--~ i0 EXIST.~GAS MAIN TEMPORARY 4, FEf?L~E ~ ~ ~ ~ 30 0 15 30 80 ~ 50LF-8 . SAN. z7 a6 r .1 ~rr.n~~~ r I ~c~ 6 j / "'~(r, LIFT STATION a - X1!J"; PVCO `~4tlX ~ ?.rraF7 rru~, ~,~;.Jh~.: ~ r 1 6°--D.LP."~FI E~SER~ CE. Lt,~:rdHOG.F~~ ~ EORGIASTREET , TREET LOCAnoN (T~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~r~3.i~ /711,16 ~ I ' ,~s ~ / a ~ SEE SH. - ` M, ,p I„~ „ .I Fr x^ ~ : ,E 1 DDC ~ A5'~irMEiER`j 8E w., 40' RJW FOR DETAILS V..W~ , I' ~ ~ ~d ,,.a SET BY CITY i ~ ~ , r _ - _ ( N ~ I-' a X WETWELL I as. Ir'r E. ~ - ~ _ - • ~ ~ I X RIM=28:0 ~ , - - Is , , r . , ~ X „ L 1~: •1 - T'73.1 f 11, II if~f L1~C5 _ - ? , j ,3(151 ~,Y~f, ~ ~ 1 ' ~ ~ ~ U1 F'~'E"C) '~J v ' EINV=15.23 ~,,al ,n I f,.s, , vz~ ~f:c~ _ _ ~ X n X:. 1 ~ ti-.` ~1 I ~'I L,1 , 1 ,JR. . - ' a. - 'r I 1. / M, - - - 'ir9 a ~ I -Xc X~ .;i. / r t f:,i „I k ,17 F.S rC'. . ~1/,.';II - "A-mil , _ ' ;o~~ I ~xls1>NG I 1 iach = 30 ft. ~ ~ ~ I X _ Yi ;n` _.c,.~,s'~~ C, Fl~E F~YDRANT ~ to ~ I ~ " J IJ ~ ~ >r ...i ~ , pa . ~ ~ ~ I i i ~ ~ . : , . ,,§1 ~ , _ ,L, . ~l ~ _ .-pax i . '~7CF 8 . SAN. - I. I • ,.1 1 PVCIO 6,4~k l III I - ,n a f fil ,q ~I ~ . ,,I> ~ / x ~ S (2)45 E W 15 X X \ _ DECK r ~ . Fs - Fs (2) 6 TEE ' . rl: t i y ~ N RISpN ~ ~ „ " 1 l V ~J~~ y V 1 t ~r f~ 4t' ~ I~ ~j mg~ i r• I ; , I 3: ia` < . ~T:~iVIIYI~f-dl.~ld"9 'rer.R ' C ~ ~~IIRCIAL T ,~IMERGIAL ~ 1~~ k ~ ~ ~ q i ' , fl ~ ~Ey ~~ck RII~lr36 I S Y ' 4 4f 1 J ,E , a"K ~ S INN` 17,7 w I I ~ ,SAN, . M.H, 5 3; 725 SF , LEGEND ~ ~ V ~ ji N INN;'=17.6 ~ ~ s ~ ~ 'aF IM 3120 :.a i ; _ ~ ! (S)INN =18 06, N ~"~iH2O 5 F E= 32.5 I I I I I ~ a I ~ I ' ~ I. x : ~ 1 11LF...6._ AN x c. X v~y,~ ^ S I (NWNNV )INV =18.06, I Z ~ WjINV , II - 0~ ~ ~ ~ p jd ~ I ~ ~ s 1 - ! I s / ~°~s 'I A ®.100X"'.,,,' s • )INV -2 . 3 ~ ~ , r+ ~F o - . I~ I X ~ 1' I ~X ~.z. 10 LF-8. SAN. X I~ (DROP) 'I' ? 'E : ~•r ~ ~ <~;i, , ~ f l , O o.4or I I, ; XX X I I I t L ~ X ROP) i i - - - - PROPERTY LINE ~ ~ u'' I h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I X. X ~.1~- II. ~ ~ I,~'I ~`~ar• ~ ~ ~(445':ELBOW I, _ r. ~ ~ I ~ , ~y X~ X X ~ X' INN=17,87 Y. { h, r s ~ FS T- I X ~ .:r ~ _ ~ , . ~ w W' PROPOSED POTABLE SERVICE r! _ r FFE=2200. ; n~,~,l. I X • I , 1 - ~ m ~ - ~ i ~ fj , I r ~ : Ik it r;. r; X I h 1 ss ss PROPOSED SANITARY SERVICE ~ s ~ II , , I,. II _ 11 X ~ , , X 4 I I ~ 'f' ~ 47LF-6" SAN. ~ I X ~ I 47LF-6" SAN. ' 6" SAN, PLUG ~ i ~ ~ r X , X ~ ~ . (..,r II , ~ r . PVC ®;1.OOSb ''r Ir k~ ~ I i X FDC ONNECTION,L CATION. aS,.:• ~ s~ PVC ®1.00 I m INV a 26.7 ~ I i I 1 { x X X X X~ r p i ~ 'X STORM SE CROSSING II a... ~ ~ I I Fs Fs PROPOSED FIRE SERVICE FlRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY'w/ ~ ~ ~ r;^j I' ~ Z ~ ' X X . X I _ I X ~ , . X x ~ ~ FlRE: HYDRANT: ~ SA TOP=16,3 , I I X H, ~ ~ - STORM: BO OM=24,4 'f' X ,X; ~ ~ (1) 6~TEE ` (1)~6~TEE I I I I I y O~ I - X X- 41;1 5 ~ti (1)~6 ~'V. . X ~ F-I ' ~ '1'f .EXISTING POTABLE SERVICE W ~ ~ DAL,, ' i - - - X X SAN. , n f / e li-. X' X ,RIM 36'55'; 1 u}~ > f s I > X , I i I ' ' 1 - ~ EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE p a LG~ ~ X ' (SW)INV, 17, 6 sE<:~., w : ' , E ' ~ ~ _ ' . X - N INV. ,1.7.,68 2s.^R ~ I . ~ I ~ 1.i ii, ~ r, 291~.13i5 ~ ~ ~ ~ I U, ~ ~ ~ ~4~aL~, X X ' X ~ r _ , _ I , i x ~ , ~ X I - _ 1 I ~,L..._ _ F~~; ~s EXISTING FIRE SERVICE I c. ~±a~ W Ei ~ 7• nAt,~ 4 ~ ( I , ~ _I ifH6stl Iff X r OOL PlN R X?" X ~X X I,r~- _ t -G'~ 1 ~;P "IILLAG" ~ I ~ ~ ~-n~~ `^X--X X~~X X--X--X EXISTING UTLLITY PLAN TO BE REMOVED A O F RETAIL&U ITS I ~ .;~i I a .,Q`„~ w - ' ? 31 X ~ I LANC?VIE:W~ i ;.75 M-~,,1,11 M'~,,1~11 88;5 I"'' ~ ~ ~ Fi I, ~ X r E ~ 1,- X" a:l~;, : I ' ~ ACHED UNI S tN,~a F~E ~ 3215 - rn t ,,,3, ~ ~k :p,. o f V: Q Z / ,Y i' , ~ iII,F,;~l~~ ~ F„~ .'JC , >•I I 123,87SF - 2~~:irf Ir:,. r „ I'; j T ~ _ a - - 6 D.LP. W.M. i , , ~ R uR X ; I ~ FFE P'32,00 ~ _ - ~ ld, a ) r G " ' D.LP. W.M. ~ n f' U K „ . < _ W ' ~ 1 ~ l: t e - I l/a'~1 I nr~ ~ I ~ W it I , _ - t.\ f ?1 ' .i Y _ - UTILITY NOTES H ~ Tr ~ , i Iw , ~ POOL ~ ~ I u ~ d - "1, 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE: LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING H-~ ' ~ I , ~?1 ~ ~ ~ X ':STp ~~WER CR SS1NG 1s'.aa ~ I I ~ ~ (~u ~tl~ : ; I'' X .~.4.;: I SAN ?0 X17.3 Iea11F , ~ i w a,""~ UNDERGROUND. UTILITIES. UTILITIES HAVE BEEN OBTAINED / ~ , ~ zR.tt__ / - ~ ~ M-SOTTO 6.3 ~''nn J ~ - 5' wI ° I r- I v ' " ~ ~ ~ ~ u.l FROM THE CITY OF"CLEARWATER UTILITY ATLAS, I I - ~ / / f , - %i I - X. - X' - --260 B"-SA E 7~3.ts -I~.~ , ~ I i N= ~i YC i ~ 115 K• i; TIRE'~HYDR~~N ~ 3 „XI PVC 6 0,40%- , ~ , F 'I cn •:I R c 1 6 TFE r A" as SIRE HYDR N ~MBI,Y W/ ~ ~ 2. .CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND -COORDINATE WATER O . / -r- , rtc , , ~b - ~ X= REM@VE EXIS , m s ' r . ,t I ~1 K' / i :a I - X ~ ~ I SAN MAIN ..I~. ~ m I,, 6" G.V, / q),6Ac.v, x ~ ~''1~1V. SERVICE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, r, .,yam Y!fl• , . - n s i , ~.•b.. i...i,., it : rc i ~A : 1.91 a' , . _ ~r` 'c i / P h_ (1~ __-DI.P,_F1RE_SERYI cn t / L1 9w ~ ~C' ; PLAYiE ~7 CIM~..; , I~~ - . r,., r r'"k~ yd R ~ - rr nr ~~'1 J ~ 7 ~ I: / ' ~ ~ 1 DDCV W BYPA 5 METER" - , X ' SET BY CITY I ~ X FDC';coNN c oN t. , aTioN t , _ ~ 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY AND. COORDINATE SEWER ~j ~ ~ ~ ,SERVICE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. ~ ~ . . ~ X . ir1) 90''EL00 ry - ~ I I L~ , ; A L1 r ~ x~~ / ~ X~. ( ~I ,k. a ~ X i ~ s i ,.X ~ X' X,; I ",0'l~t~,1 ; L h tf ;r „ ' X I~ y n 'r ~ r 4. ,CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL r ~ , vry, wy „ i. i~ S 1~1~ r I~ ~ ~ X I \ aC r' ____l. c rl, K , t -T.~ ax .rV t - _ 'a ~'iL - ~ ~ . I X'':.,_= , X Xi ' ! STORM/SE R CR0531NG : 11.,... F;S ,STUB r~~' I IG .t,. ~ T. ~ ~Y' M 1 ~ I ~ *~I ~ `POWER SERVICE WITH LOCAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. y~ ~ ~ ~ `z r r, u . , ~a " ~ ~ ~N TOPm17 7 , _ l u i a" ~ ~ ~ rouar~ie ( i~Y ~ . , 1 \ X, X~ STORM~80Ti0l~=28.3 ~ ' - ~ X er~L ~ ' ,II X. ~ 'rXAI~ ~~A ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ v ! ~h I~ 5. `SEE SITE BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR LOCATION \ _ _ N 1 _ . _ _ _ L L ~ _ X' ~ , '~~~i r a~ bE. I 1 \ ~ r REMOVE-:.EXIST , _ _:n n N .`v:: .Y : ~T< 'I~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OF OTHER EXISTING UTILITIES, ~ r f° ~ ~ ~ `9 ' ~ ,p .G V `'a JECk- ~ =7_ Iplj 6". W:M - 1.. J X. ~ .:3 (If1p 3 ':~1.,<:vI,. 1 I ~ , r r~ ~ ` I ,`;~I 6. ! ~~EE GENERAL NOTES SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL UTILITY NOTES. i ~ X k ~ '(1}6 DLP. IAIER SERVICE ~ rT~'" ~ ( mil A iN c&a1 } -,;i ;t,Lt"d~I-~~7U~~~, I , ~I~ X:~i:`~Xd 'I ET,= YCITY (1) METER d~!~BACKr~.OW PREVENTER y" tl' M . I ~ _S L, ~ W ET- Y cITYI' j I~ ' ' ",r'~-~ ~ 7, JNEORMATION DEPICTED REGARDING EXISTING UTILITIES IS ® E-I H / ' EW~,i ~W li, II I ~ ~ tF~ ,,II 1~ ; ~ , X 8 M„STUB::(,) X ~ \ ~ 2 _ TEE'. _;I ~,s <; TEE ~ I I ' _f ~ APPROXIMATE°AND IS NOT FIELD VERIFIED; PRIOR` TO' COMMENCEMENT ~ (2) 6 c.v. I ~C i _ OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR WILL FIELD LOCATE & -VERIFY ~ / ~ ~ I I .REMOVE EXIST, M.H, ~6 , F S STUB ( L) i ~ ` ~ :i• I , r._ :JC c SAN. :H. 4 FFE = 22.00 I J . MN X30 ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ;j ~ ,EXISTING UTILITIES e,g. TYPE OF UTILITY, INVERT, CONDUIT. MATERIAL ~ FIRE H ANT ~ -X----- I 6" SAN, 5NB 'l ~ , ; ~ ; v r ' , ; _ RIM X30 86 A5 BLY R > _ INN= 00 in (S)INN ;.2 4 1 1~ gg ~ I~ f,. ' ,FCT. AND CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. (S)INV'`~2 4 (DROP): ' ~ ~ li ? , - - . jr' _ ~ (N)INV 12.10 / 1 X N ,g IX .k.;. 1 ~ ~ INN a1 : , vl, I , Z c (N)INV 17.10 ~ ~ ' I ~ i~; SAND/OR CONFLICTS. W' INV a1 . ~i t1~~ i '-L.-;.~ C X ,`C X ,i X E 90LF-8 SAN w Q t,, X U 1 / Ls; I: , I I, I .rr, ' X.._. ?l~i~`x , s, PVC. 0 D.4Q9; > / I 4 I , r6 DIP: F.S. x I ~ IlrzY 1AI~HCIth~~ I p ~ ~ ~ III ri = rR ~ 8. UNDERGROUND WATERMAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED, AND COMPLETED w - Q U - , I-C,~ P I :X - ~ :.,PVC ~ 1Ap ~ . - _ ~ 1 ~ ~ v 2 TEE-,. is _ _ I, . ~ ~ ~ J, ~ ;r ; i X X r I II (2) 6..C.V: >'1 (2) s TEE. ; , ~ f I _ ~~;4J ~ ~ AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AS PER NFPA 241. a o ,rt , y " , / ~ ~ ~ X ~ ~~~,,I, ~ 90 - ~ ~ _ I' X ~I, ;.X it I~., X;;- (2) - X N X s c.v , ~ y( _ _ .w..~ ~ J l)11 _ LZ LJ Q X \\I SAN. M.H: Yp`f _ 0 X X, y4, i I 9. 'CONTRACTOR. SHALL. INSTALL FIRE SERVICE LINE FROM TAPPING w w I- 1 y r - uru ~ ; : ~ I RIM:= , a s~ 1 .._u~ ' aJ.` , M~ ~ ; r , ~ ~ .,;I ' H RISO ',;V; ~ , ~ ~ SLEEVE & VALVE. TO THE LOCATION OF BACKFLOW PREVENTER 'o o w v ~Lno~ ~ ~ ~ z 31.3, ' ~ AND FROM DEVICE TO BLDG. a a ~ ~ ~ ~ NW I V=17.66: . ~ I r ~ , b , D . X _ ~ ~eT ~L ~ u ITS I ~ , X r, I _ x _ _ , _ . ~ ~ x , • , - 11, 5.94 F . . , . t~ X.:; 1~FEF „r - - p ,~I~ ~<..~p s~, ~ t~ C~ ~X~~> 10. INSTALL A KNOX KEY. BOX FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS AS PER. it T N N t ~ " ' SINN=25;Dt ~ r Ii; ,.,t 1 90 ELBOW O (E)D~T;)„ xati' - a- ; ~E ~ 1) 6" G.V. ;;1- :.i .p„ c~ O , D.LP FIRE SERVICE .al~~ U ,,,,,M .,.m I NFPA 1, SEC, 3-6 .AND .INSTALL PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION. Y Y m i) 6" TEE I' , 1) 6" GV ,I ~ 3i`:jF ~ ~ I > - - ~I 1'x(1 riU. ~'I•~I : s~Xln~~~r~ I ,,x ~ `rl 7. ~ ~ i ~ ~{y, 'r 1~' ,r,~r c ~ , ,c ,I ~ -~I ~ a I r ~ ~ 11, THE CITY OF CLEARWATER AT APPLICANT'S EXPENCES, WILL REMOVE ~ ~ ~ FS - F5~ FS ~ - FS - FS - FS FS - FS' FS~=-- FS` S -XF5 - fS. .rJ" FS -~,FS F5 ~ FS ~ f5 FS - FS - FS N f5 ~ _ F FS FS ~5 FS i 1 , ~ u~~ ' 7.- , : , • I r3.J r)-J I,'r~ r n N ~ ' ,r!`~ lam' .,I , 'I ,II^. ~ °T + ~~`'U'''~ RELOCATE. AND/ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO BE RELOCATED AS PART a „ " ~ _ X X CONSTRUCT 2" ~8L0W0 ; ~ ,I ~F ~ ~ sA11E~ OF THIS. DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING RECLAIM .WATER METERS:. o: ~ ( . , ' 'n ~ ~ r _ = AT END OF 4 WM.=TQ:'REMAS` r: F,;;,;a,~.. e ,rrl ~ rr; f^..; ~,E, ,1.~ ~ i' - o.<... ~ ~)16 D,L~, WATER SERVICE ~ ~rr- a, " U ~ i „~5'aFF 'NO METERS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN ANY IMPERVIOUS AREAS. J ~ J' y , U . i 'a^;. X ! ~ "~'1 ' 1t p,, li ~ a ME RI; ~ B .,7,. rt, j 7 i ~ ~ ~ . , ~ (i) TE ¢c; ACK FLOW PREVENTER , , ~ ~ _ Y CITY /V~ 36: I'1 7 y r ~ a. ~ SET B ~ , a=. ,.c ' - 1 ~ ~^e I : Y „ -r it ~.i r,'c ' ~ I ~ . ~ Ic.,,4: ~ 6~ I P FIRE SERVICE sx I c ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ ~ 12. 'WHERE UNDERGROUND WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED, ° ~ o ~ 1 . D I _ 41> I~ 1 I I~ C ( i , y r ; ; ' I . P: f; ~ . 1 ME: , BA K FLOW PREVENTER " a, ~ ~ ~n i~ THEY SHALL BE INSTALLED, COMPLETED, AND IN SERVICE PRIOR TO ~ " F •.r•V9a ' .r ~.~F <O JE~L~ „C` I s E ;1 113LF-8 SAN. n. _ ~ !i. . ~ . . ~ . . * Y' , z SET Y ITY ~ 3 471E SAN, F I. -I ~_ii IL-: ~t a ,~.i nl , , , f~l',Ii,'ll III?. L~11.G1,„ I` PVC 00.40X= 47LF-SAN. PVC i ~E .CONSTRUCTION AS PER NFPA 241 " W ?r'.11r ,EI a .~I. ,.6~. _ , } ~ mt,009~:OPE F r ,1 J ~ ~ 1 ~ 3~;i F { - iU Jl l,IH - , , v ~i - - ~p. 1.. i F,• ll.l (j uC, mt.00~.OPE MIN, f fly' " ~ p a U J. r ,u~ ~ ~ ~~I I • ~'3 1"J t ~1`',~ / 1NV~26; I r 9R 6"SAN, p UG j~ I hl W~ Q INV~2s ,t, ! ~ 13. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A.SIGN THAT STATES ° a ~ t,,,l; I , r n J ' r,~,U 'a _ .9.r)~~i L_ i ..'.P~~ioY:i E yr,ll V u~~y I ``'i~, ' y~ '=a " FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION" AND SHALL BE DESIGNED IN N ~ NO PARKING, ~ 1 > r ~ r d c I t-. ~ ~ , ~ .t I ~ I 1 ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS FOR ;1" ry as; tl ~t _ ~ y ' 'I ` ~h ~ r INFORMATION SIGNAGE AND BE MAINTAINED WITH A CLEARANCE OF. 7 1/2 FEET o 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ SAN, M;H, ~ 3 ~?r r >;tC~ ? - % ~ TRIM ~~31~2 , . ~i; r :}t~21 r z r ~ ~ ~ . + ' ~1 IN .FRONT OF AND TO SIDE OF APPLIANCE. AS PER FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION..: N o Q E INV'= t(:) : ~ : " I - '~"~~4 CODE, 2001 EDITION. MODIFICATION TO SECTION. 3-5.6 OF NFPA ~ 10 ' ° y~, I i' MAIN Y'Y O O (N)INV 291 V4,, ii.~~~~~ t _ 1 X ~,.o.bl, ~ ;2 ..r n,:,~Y ' - 'j i ; ~ 3 5J,_41. I I' 1 14. FIRE. HYDRANTS SHALL HAVE CLEARANCES OF 7 1/2 ON THE FRONT AND: SIDES. Z ..I~R IsoN - 1 SEC, 3-5.6 n. X' ,t.si , ~ , F I ~ 1i ALSO, WITH A 4 FT, CLEARANCE TO THE REAR OF THE HYDRANT PER- NFPA 1, rxw>-~-ozrn 1 ~ 1 , r c ,tr G;: ~ , c ~3 A 1~~1V11Vi~~1;1,~e9~ l ~ _IIFi,.I ~ it ~ ~a ;QM~ERCI I €~M~IERCIAI~ ,~~_I , I ~ - jP a- A a;e~ ,2$ sF X X ' ' III E ,I ~ ~ ~,;7, 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE RELOCATION OF POWER & LIGHT. POLES WITH Z. : : r c I FFE;aazs WITH:. THE LOCAL.UTILITY COMPANY. ALSO THERE SHALL BE A 2 HORIZONTAL W i ~ I ri ~ ~JO,~,. G i ; ~ r r , _ _ ~ , I t ~ . i CLEARANCE FROM THE EDGE OF SIDEWALK TO ANY VERTICAL STRUCTURES. B r Y ~y. ~ ,!`.i , < ' ~ ~ ~ s ~ ` X ~ <<, ' 16. AT APPLICANT'S EXPENSE THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL REMOVE & RELOCATE , ~ r.>~ _ > I :ANY/ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO BE RELOCATED AS PART OF THIS ~ ~ ~ ~ _ 4 ' ~ ~ 'I' ` ` '.t ° ~ ~ ` ~ • -DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING RECLAIMED WATER METERS. (NO METERS SHALL BE D r, 4 ~ w " r' ,h V 'ys~ ` ~ ` `~A`~ LOCATED WITHIN ANY IMPERVIOUS AREAS.) 7°0 6 n6"~;~TAPPINO:SLEEVE F,I ~t~lr ~ ~ ~ ~ ; EXIST. - JUN p921e , r I" r L i~ FIRE HYDRANT TAPPINQ:sLEEVE 17. ALL PLANTINGS WITHIN ANY EASEMENT WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE PROPERTY >o RI do -VALVE , t: (UNDER CONSTRUCTION)- ~~L:u n i7 . ' . ~ l I is t 1 39 i;; i i ~ F- RI ' , 1, ~ ,~F, + ; i OWNER S RISK, THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY/ALL UPROOTED p~ppJN ,,z, ' EXISTING FlRE HYDRANT - cn ' - , c I F (1 CONTACT CLEARWAIER ANd::CONNECT NEW.•GA' - _ ~ -JONESST~ET r i _ 40' racT cLEaRwA~ER cAs ro RELOCATE ' ~~.t~: ~ I OR DAMAGED PLANTS WITHIN EASEMENT(S) IF THE CITY NEEDS. TO ~ ONCT LOCATION TO EXIST, GI _ , , I ~ ~ ~ ~i C' U4~ DRAWN BY. ' A110N TO EXIST,'GA5 M N I 1 - MAINTAIN/REPLACE EXISTING UTILITY MAINS. Q~1 ii ~ i 4 r~ __~!1 ~ i ~ - L.iii lJ.• 41EA~YZSF04ZL'' IIC~'nE~.l~f,iLEtli,i+ tilts ?pl CHICK dT: KhL ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 v, ,q AIN 8, f,,, ~E 2;09 ,oh3.,.a> PERMIT SET ONLY j ~ +16.Hh SHEET rr:. N i " NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 6 of 12 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 4' CONC, SIDEWALK Z mlh Match Existin if Grass Plantin or Other 4 Drop at All Drives )rives . -Z ' RQ . g Nan-Walking Surface „ 5 Sid Existing Sidewalk 5 1 mlh ehtl 1 Drop at Wearln Ar °I g All Drives g 1-1 2 R ~ -1 /2"R Wearing Surfac ~ ° I° t• ~ rl°I Grass Plantin or Other Surface Si' ~ g 3 4,>R ~ c Non-Welkin Surface ~ ~ / ~ ~;d '9 o g 4/5 / ~ 6" 6" 6" Vertical Curb ~ ~ : ~ + ' x ICI JI L~-I J RAMP CURB ° / ~:d'~;Q• in Transition / 3 a~ , " ~ ;A'• N 2' ~ \ r 0 ~ / 14 -8 Tie beam with R ~ ~ ;d, ;P• ~ :~;:;Q: :g': Base ~ o ~ Base - - - ~ ~ Base - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2-#5 rebar continuous ~ ' / 'q'' • _ L ~ 12' P°° F~-,• T~ - - om acted ~ ~ ~4~~::~:4~ . i i - - - - - - i i swing gate (typ.) ~ ~ ~ sr A - - - - - , ~ ' • C. P ~ m acted, s,,. F . • , • .Co p °c~ . 'o ~ ~ . ' 'Subgrade . ° G Flow Llne \ _ • 'Subgrade • . Compacted, L6" dia. Steel bollards clearance min. a Q s c-° f~ ~ Exist, Type I Curb Remove Back of Curb \ ' / / ~ 77 / r , Subgrade • ~ • ~ a conc. Filled (typ) ~ ' ~s ~ ° if Existing \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \ 3'° A \ \ \ \ \ / / . /\\j~~~j~~~~~~ 10'-B" ~ I ~ ~ I 1-#5 at 4' center U ° ~ • RETURNED CURB RAMPS \ ~ ~ U $ ~ I I 6' drop pin \ /~7\ If "x" is less than 48" then VALLEY GUTTER CURB the slope of the flared side 48 ~ ~ 12' I Q -r Max I clearance min, Gr " de ~ ~ shall not exceed 12; L STRAIGHT CURB ~URB oo .I 14 ~ ISOMETRIC VIEW „ ~ r. VALLEY GUTTER CURB NOTES: 0 I ~ ~ I swing gate (tm•) s" 6 ~ ~ CURB DROP CURB CONC. RAMP 1. There shall be a 1 2" Seal 'Dint between 4' I 3000 ps.i. concrete slab with ~ ~ ~ s Min. ~ I " fiber mesh reinforcing - ~ I>_.1 0 ~ I~ ~ / ~ TRANSITION CURB TRANSITION BACK OF SIDEWALK back of curb and driveway. ~ - - - - - - - J 8 x 16 concrete footing monolithic, min 6" thickness, u..J ~ ` ~J ~ I w/ 2- #5 rebar (typ.) 6"x6"/ 10x10 W.W,F, ~ 1 ~ 0 c c' Textured surface 2. Concrete in curbs shall be 3000 psi, with " ~ • fiber mesh reinforcing. PLAN ~ a~ a 4.. a drop pin hole ELEVATION ~ z ~ z - - - - - - - - a. • 12:1 MAX. FLOW LINE N.T.S, U i:~» ELEVATION A-A O B_B SECTI N o s' 1. Ramps are designed to the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATE OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA E Z ~ Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMI to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. ENGINEERING ENGINEERI~ .IC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING ENGINEERING rZ,i O ~ 2• Ram s Shall Have a Tactile Surface, Textured to a REDRAWN BY DATE R wN BY pp 1 4/14/95 leometric dew redrarm p,w,p. TYPICAL SIDEWALK 1 93 ~0V0 2 9 DRAB 1! BY 9~0 W U] De th Not Exceedin 1 8 b use of Tamp or roller P 9 / y CURB CUT RAMPS INDEx N0. pEdfED gY TYPICAL CURB In Conformance with Requirements of FOOT ~ 1/95 Added note CFEa(ED BY 1 4/9/02 Rev. Notes RD. TYPICAL CURB CROSS INDEx N0. CHECKED BY DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE r1DEx N0. M~ ~ 101 1 4/9/02 Rev, Notee R,Q p,y, 701 ~ U ^ Roadwa and Traffic Desl n Standards, Detail 304 T,c,J' PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED tos w,JS, SECTIONS y 9 REV, DAZE DESCRIPIIGN App, DESIGNED BY REV. DATE DESCRIP110N App, DESIGNED BY SECTIONS REV, Dare oESCR~naN OE5(PltlHED eY SINGLE 1 ~ 3 O a 1 of z ~ Or Most Recent Modificationsr C.M.H. 2 OF 3 C.M.H. + as w .one Ga``e eCt S`~ 1 3' Transition NOTE: Wings only ii pied ~+o~`oi E~`5 side slo es Re ulre. Remove Curb if Existing ~~h w ~w Q ti~~~e55r~'~ Exist Conc Drive ~ .~F F~dy 12,• 12'• 12° Max Slope A ~ w A o+ A Back of Curb Max Slope-~1" 1"~ Non-slip surface require- ~ menu see Note 8. NORMALLY 48' °rt 'r:,' ? 1 ~ q ~ ye I--I • a 4" Construction Joint q ~ ~~ret~' MAXIMUM 50' 1 /2 v 1/2" Exp. Joint Err 1/2" Exp. Joint SECTION A-A Permitted (Typ) F~°~eee l'~`Igl O Z ~ EXPANSION JOINT STRUCK JOINT - EXPANSION JOINT VARIES a ~ ~ ~ NORMAL VALLEY GUTTER CURB ~ o~,e e-I YPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTIC i ~ u Pro ert R.O.W. Line T ASS SECTION SECTION -SEE INDEX 101 ~ ~ U c 1/4 " / FT. MIN, EXPANSION JOINT ~ A ~ C 6"R (Typ) H m Conc, Sidewalk p'a ~ ~ D ° o D ° ° ,D, ° o D, ° ' o'D, ° ~'p a ~ o' B B D . ;a,p'• , ;o.D•. ,a,D , ,a, a, a Dr o PLAN VIEW OSDE L ° ~ " 'd ° A B C` TYPICAL SIDEWALK PLAN EouAL T I wA K E ~ WIDTH (6' MAXIMUM) 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK a e - {PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE, CLASS 1 W/ FlBERMESH) ~ R --1/2" BITUMINOUS STRIP E 4' Min Residential Street ~ ~ ° ~ ----BROOM FINISH _ " d' 1, SIDEWALK TO BE MINIMUM 4" THICK CONCRETE. 6" MINIMUM AT DRIVEWAYS ~ sidential Street 1' City R/W ( ) Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut ~ a 5' Min Arterial Street e•' ''1~•~ ~''::;r~ '~•i 2, SIDEWALK TO NAVE 1/2 RADIUS TOOLED EDGES• or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. rterial Stree~ 2' County R/W Limits of concrete swale Limits, of pay quantity ~1 ~.~a:~ ';~w' ~:'•w'•~'rl•:'~•"' '.+.'g.'~"~ MINIMUM OF 1 1 2" AND AT INTERVALS SPECIFIED BY FOOT, , i , ,:,5.:, ,;,},fa .r;.,•.~••;~ 3, CONTRACTION JOINTS TO BE A / per Foot • I S A CURBING DRVEWAYS AND ALL Modified and Valle Gutter Curbs 1/4 per Foot " • ' ' 4. EXPANSION ,.QINTS ARE REQUIRED BETWEEN SIDEWALK ND Y 'Din exist back of curb .PLAN z ~ IrHy-I ~ EXPANSIDN JOINT STRUCK JOINT STRUCK JOINT FIXED OBJECTS AND A T INTERVALS SPECIFIED BY FDOT• ~ 5 EX ANSION JOINTS SHALL CONSIST OF CONTINUOUS 1 2" X 6" BITUMINOUS EXPANSION ~~`~'Y'~"' ` . P / STRIP. 12" Textured Surface 3000 psi conc 4" thick. „ 1 ~ Max Slope Back of Curb conc 4" thick. Constr. 6" ~ W 6. MINIMUM CR05S SLOPE 1/4" TO 1'-0 ,MAXIMUM 1/2" TO 1'-0", OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ~`r'~,''"~' thick at driveways with 6~ r, , , I NOTES: ENGINEER, welded wire mesh. See nc riveways with 6x6 #10 1 e mesh, See note 7. , • L 7. AREA UNDER~~'ROPOSED SIDEWALKS TO BE COMPACTED PER FOOT STANDARD ~'r.' Remove to an 1. SIDEWALKS SHALL HAVE TOOLED EDGES, DNS-128-9.2 1 2" Ex ansion Joint even 'Dint or sawcut UCK JOINTS OR EXPANSION JOINTS ONLY. SPECIFICATI / P 2, CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED AT STR 8. DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER UNLESS INDICATED • w 3. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN AND ALONG EDGE ABUTTING CURB, OTHERWISE. 4, EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL CONSIST OF CONTINUOUS 1/2" BITUMINOUS EXPANSIDN STRIP, As sltowN. SECTION A-A SECTION B-B B ~ 9, SIDEWALK TO HAVE BROOM FNISH, I ~ 10• CONCRETE Si1ALL BE CURED PER FOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE NOTES: SECTION B-6 ~ 4 6 Continuous ~ W CONSTRUCTION, SECTION 520-8 1. Provide tooled joints at distances matching the width. Also 8. Ramps shall have a tactile surface, textured to a depth not N ~ ALK place expansion Joints at driveways. exceeding t/8" by use of tamp or roller In conformance with DEUV EI RET N 2, If same physical obstruction exists which prevents the placing requirements of FOOT Roadway and Truffle Design Standards, ~J of sidewalks as shown, contact the Engineering Division for Detail 304 or most recent modifications. T L ~DE A KTYPI A AIL alternate location, DET IN T TRU SECTION C-C ~ W N 3. Wooden and other spacers will not be permitted in sidewalks or NTS driveways. NTS 4. No coatings of any kind will be permitted an concrete CITY OF CLEARWATE sidewalks or driveways without specific approval of the City PUBLIC WORKS ADM NOTE: ~ ~ ' OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA W Engineer. 3 4/9/02 Rev Notes R.0. LIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING SubJect to City Engineers approval. ENGINEERING 5. All concrete shall be 3000 psi min. ®28 days, with fiber ENGINEERII mesh reinforcing. 2 1/96 added note REgy(~Y1N BY TYPICAL SIDE TYPICAL SIDEWALK o^~ To be used only in unique situations. RE~oVx~ BY CONCRETE SWALE ~ 92 0 6. Concrete surface to be Ilght broom finish. CONSTRUCTIO CHEa(ED BY 7. Concrete drivewa construction shall be 6" thick w 6x8 10x10 I 11 93 madlDad orb cut Y / / CONSTRUCTION AND 1 s3 DETAIL ~ INDEx N0. CHECKED BY 9lDEX N0, ~.i LC.J. welded wire mesh reinforcement. REV, DATE DESCRIPnaN App, DESIGNED BY RAMP DEl iG9 VALLEY GUTTER CURB 107 ~ U RAMP DETAIL REV. Dn>E DESCRiPnaN ,v~, DESONED ~ t of 1 a o W 1 OF 3 M,G.B. Z J Q C.M.H. F- F- Z W W H ~ ~ W " 2~r ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ooiv " '-5" „ a a ~ ~ N 2" 1 1 2" TYPE S-ID 'PE S-ID o o AS HALTIC CONCRETE CONCRETE N N ~ Y Y m ~ r"x~t• o °o , L ~ 6 LIMEROCK R R O R o ~ ~ o ~r BASE MATERIAL ATERIAL ~ IN. = 100) 3 ~ r<, "d• I LBR MIN. = 100 2 ~ ) R 2 e o i~ ~z Qw o ~ oo „ R R oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 12 COMPACT STABILI I o0 R N o PACT STABILIZED SUBGRADE ~ o T / ~n °o \ ~ \ \ ~ \ TO 98~ MIN• MOD, F MIN, MOD, PROCTOR VALUE ~ • ° PER ASTM D-1557 I Tn - ~ r N NN iM D-1557 (LBR MIN, = 40) o ~ o O U U W a. F- ~ . T R M e N N DET P VEMENT E a7 ~ ~ N t' :TAIL ~ .yc 2 • o. PLAN TYPE E o NTS „ L Approx, Weight 465 Lbs. RII~~ ° o N . oo ~ 0 o CAST IRON GRATES Z ~ N O Q ~ ~ ~ , ~ w 6„ X ~ ~ 3,_4.. 6" 3000 PSI o 0 ~ ~ ~ " ¢'_4" CONCRE CONCRETE PAVEMENT r N o z o X534 r " 534 " , ~ ~ o ~ 3 -0 R 3 o:w>-~-ozv~ r N ~ 3 MIN:.. ~ ~ , i; ~ R , Grate ~ ~ ~ ; ~ o: i i; i ~ ~ w 2 CI. Eye Bolts ~ ®M ~ ;i: z z ~ See Index '40 N 12" COMPACTED SUBf IMPACTED SUBGRADE w R ~ ® c N o B ~ TO 98% MAX, DEN. ~ ~ 38% MAX, DENSITY oP w~ R I Nm c o Go #4 Bars ~ o m z c? ~ ®12 Ctrs N ~ ~VEMENT . N~ ~a • SECTION TYPE E zr ~m TYPE E Strai ht Bars 2"x 3 16° NTS ~W 9 ~ Recommended Maximum Pipe Size: Reticuline Bars 1 1 4" x 3/16" 3',-0'" Wall-24; Pipe Bands 1 1~2" X 1 4" ~D zW 4 -6 Wall-42 Pipe Approx. Weight 215 Lbs. STEEL GRATES JUN 0~ G~u~ DRAWN BY; RJM INI FT F NOTICE: Steel Grates Are Required On Inlets With Traversable Slots And On Inlets where Bicycle Traffic pU1N CF ATEFSVCS ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15,05 Is Anticipated. SHEET FD OT TYPE nEn INLET NTS 7 OF 12 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 \ ~ 9 5/8" ~ z _ n.t.s. n.t.s. Cleanout Plug c i ~ v 1 t Back of Curb _ ~J 10 5/8" Max. 15' -Min. 4' or Connecting Piece w/integrally p ..F Fire Hydrant Assembly „ Edge of Pavement cast Mech. Joint Gland on T Concrete Pad 4° ~ 18 Min. (Yp ) Thick x 1'-6" Sq, g 7/g" i 1 " x, one End-D.I. Rotatable Mech. 24 Ma Distance Varies Valve Box Joint Gland on Other End. 6 o~ 6" or 8"- 1/8 Bend Length Varies ' ~y ~ ~ i (See Note 1) U I Plug ~ ~ Valve and Hydrant Tee (See Note) ~ z w/D.I. Rotatable Mech. Joint 00 -~-Mech. Joint ~ H Gland on Plain End Branch. ~ Valve ~ ~ rJ U ~ i .Sewer Main 13 1 /2" ~ p N ~ Mech. Joint Valve ~ ¢G ~~r~ tli 0a:' ~a,~~^. ONLY APPROVED I CLEANOUT PLUG DETA L ~ ~ ~Q: c I Kennedy Guardian No. K-81 A CLEANOUT DETAIL N.T.S. ~ ~ ' Muller Centurion No. A-423 Water Main U.S. Pipe Metropolitan 1_, N.T,S. NOTE: Cleanout plug to be w ? ~ ~ r ~ J NOTES: U,S, Foundry 7621 ~ U G ' 1. On H drants Re uiring Runout NOTES: I ~ Joint T y q Restraining (yp ) or equal ection to Face Street. Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained 1. Steamer Conn CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Per Detail 403 (2 of 2). CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 2. All Fire Hydrants to have 5 1/4 Valve Seat. PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 3. Fire H drants Shall be Placed at Street Corners ENGINEERING ENGINEERING Y REDRAw,I BY TYPICAL HYDRANT DAh REORANN BY TYPICAL HYDRANT DAnt i2 REORA BY STANDARD ~1 07 95~-~ O ~ or in the R.O.W. Adjacent to Side Lot Lines B.v.D. of 15 92 B.V.D. SETTING 01 15 92 Whenever POSSIble. CHECKED BY SETTING INDEK N0. CHECKED BY IND 0. CHECKED BY CLEAN OUT INDEX No, w ~ ~ G.C.H. 402 PLAN VIEW DESIONm BY Sheet 3 for T ical Connections & Fittin s. Y DAB DESIONmBY CROSS-SECTION REV, DAnE oESCAIPnaN APP. 3 OF 4 4. See yp g AE . oESCRIPnoN APR 2 OF 4 G.C.H. APPR04ED BY Sanitar 304 ~ ~ REV, DAZE DESCRIrnoN T.C,J. 1 or 1 a T.C.J. oa ao oooa as w 0 0 0 ~ " 0 0 Flow Flow ~ 0 0 0 0 0 Tapped Flange ~ Brass Nipples 2" Backflow ~ Tapped Flange A W 0 Ball Valve ~ / (Typ,) f Preventer ~ Ball Valve ~ ~x.i ~ NOTES. . ~ 1. WATER MAINS TO BE ON NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.O.W., APPROX. 4 FT. BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER. Top View 90' Brass EII 90' Brass EII ~ ~ Z S CE CONNECTIONS TO BE 2 FT. FROM SIDE LOT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT SEE 2. ERVI ( A roved Backflow BYPASS DETAIL ~ U ~ i pP ~ SHEET N0. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CONSISTENT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION. DRIVEWAYS Ford Meter Flan e e e t'o a 'ce Approved Backflow ix 'r"I g Pr v n i n D vi (Flanged) SHALL NOT BE BUILT OVER METERS. Preventer ~ ~ ~ U 3. ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED and PRESSURE TESTED TEST FOR ONE HOUR ®150 P.S.I. ( ) Resilient Seat Plate Strainer Resilient Seot OS & Y Valve ~ ~ OS & Y Valve UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE Ford Angle a ve Flan ed V I Flow TESTING and CHLORINATION THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES. ( 9 ) Flan ed Tee Flan ed Tee 4. TEN FT. SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. Flanged 90' Bend ~ ~ 9 Flanged 90° Bend 5. SADDLE IS RE UIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 4" PVC MAINS. SADDLE IS Q REQUIRED FOR 2" SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 6" and LARGER PVC MAINS. LARGEST SERVICE " ARGEST TO ANY MAIN IS 2". CONNECTION TO A 4 MAIN IS 1 1/2 and L Brass Ni le O o0 0 0 0o O Uniflange Pp 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36 . Meter Meter Flan ed i ~ g ) Threaded Corporation Stop Curb Stop ~ L 12" ~ D.I. Pipe m MUELLER H15008 MUELLER H1435C, with Lock Win and o v 9 or a roved a ual ~ in E ~ pp q Compression inlet or approved equal o ~ ~1 ~N r/~ (Tap at 45 Angle) ~ In ~ 12 ~ W U Supports ~ H Saddle if Re uired q M,J, 90' Bend M.J. 90' Bend w See Note 5 , o I , Water Service Tubing Flow ~ ~ Q Driscopipe 5100 or Endot/Yardley TYPICAL SINGLE DEVICE 1 1 2" and 2" MODEI..S TYPICAL COMPOUND WATER METER. SET rrte~,, ~ SDR 9 3408 Pol eth lene NOTE: Blue Jet, y y NOTE: n.Ls. ® r"~' ~ Saddle shall have double X, ~ , ~ NOTE: 1.OS&Y 1. 0 S & Y Valve Handles will be Chained and Locked, ~ ~ H stainless steel Straps Device must be installed level. 2, Meter Se 2, Meter Sets will be Painted After Installation, 3, Bypass Pipe & Fittings Shall be Threaded Brass. H with a ox coated 3. Bypass P p y CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ~j ~ ductile iron body. PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ~ Water Main ENGINEERING ~ APPROVED R.P. DEVICES ~ APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES ENGINEERING APPROVED ~ APPROVED R.P, DEVICES ~ APPROVED DOUBLE-CHECK VALVES PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION REDRAWN Br DACE R BY TYPICAL METER SETS W DA Hersey-Be Herse Beeco Model 6CM Herse Beeco Model No, 2 ENGINEERING ~ ~ RmRAwN TYPICAL COMPOUND DA w B.V.D. Ot 15 92 Hersey-Basco Model FRP II Hersey-Basco Model FDC / 02 94 Ames 500 WATER MAIN SERVICE Watts Model 909 or 009 Wotts Model 709 or 007 cHECKED ~ BACKFLGW PREVENTERS INp D. Wotts Mod ~ 12/22/84 REV. WAnR SERNCE OCH CHECKED BY IND N0. Ames 5000 SS Ames 2000 SS MJP 02 94 Wotts Model 909 or 009 Watts Model 709 or 007 cHECKEO BY WATER METER SET o i NeNO r~E CONNECTION DETAIL ~1 Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 1 1/2 and 2 MODELS Conbraco AEV. DAni DESCRIPnON App, DESIGNED BY ~ OF 3 REV. DAZE DESCRIPnON App, DESIONEO BY 2 OF 5 Conbraco 40200 Conbraco 40100 90° RISE F iJ REV. DALE DESCIBPTION 'pp, DESIGNED BY 3 Of 5 ~ Q > 3 ,4' and 6' MODELS o w z ~ Q z 1 1 2" DETACHABLE ADAPTOR / CONNECTION AND CAP W ` / O o w TYP CAL ~A~1/E SETTING ~ ~ W D- ATTACHED CHAIN a. a w THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS: L DET D PP S n.t.s. n.t.s. 1. BEND -INLET AND OUTLET Y Y m 2. TEE -OUTLET BRANCH 3. OFFSETS -INLET AND OUTLET 4. CAPS ~ 5. PLUGS t~ 6. DEAD ENDS 7. HYDRANT RUNOUTS SHALL BE RESTRAINED AS DEAD ENDS ` 3 FN- ~ N Q W Adjustable ~ ~ ~ Valve Box ~ ~ ° 2 1 2"x1 1 2° REDUCER / / L Megalug Restrainer (Typ.) FS g~p~',p o ~ o C` ~ ORI6,d~I~AL ~ W a i ; . FS ~ , FS S FS FS ` L r ~ A ` ` ~ ~ When Valve Occurs in Roadway, co U ° W w / \ . \ /\l~ \ ~ \ set Base an 10-Common Brick. W ~ o \ i / ~ N ~ N / ~ Ebba 1500 Series T ~i (YP•) s - T~~ . i;~, ~ m o0 N O Q ~ d' c0 ~ O O ON ALL TEES, A MININUM OF 5' SHALL BE N O RESTRAINED ON EACH RUN LEG o L =MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) D:W~-UI-OZU1 Z Water Main FIGURES BASED ON 30" DEPTH BURY, 150 PSI TEST PRESSURE. 8° PVC MAXIMUM SIZE USED IN SYSTEM Mech. Joint Valve Z NOTE: THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND VALVES SHALL BE 4 Fire Service o BY USE OF EBBA IRON MEGALUG RESTRAINERS, THRUST RESTRAINT 0 Restraining Joint BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA IRON SERIES 1500 W NOM. ELBOWS (deg.) VALVE RESTRAINERS. TEES DEAD o~ PIPE END SIZE 11.25 22.50 45 g0 BRANCH Z~ s e 90° Bend 4 2 4 9 21 28 46 CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA w MJ X SLIP PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION. PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION u ~ 6 3 6 12 29 47 65 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ~Q AEDRAMN BY TYPICAL VALVE D ~ ~ m 8 4 S 16 38 66 85 BAV D Y s o2 ss CHECKED BY THRUST INDp(N0. 19 B,V.D. 01 15 92 l CHEa{EDBY SETTING i o0 DESIGNED BY RESTRAINING 403 REV. DA1E DESCRIPnoN APP. G.C.H. 1 of 2 CROSS-SECTION REV, DATE DESCPoP110N N'P• D~G,C.H.Y 1 OF 4 F m o~ zw ~lf~ f~~~~ DRAWN BY. RJM 11 LS U 11 L5 CHECK BY: KEZ U ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 JUN O9 2005 SHEET PLANNING DEVELOPMENTSVCS CI7YOFCLEARWATER 8 OF 121 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 L r ~ . Z Z GENERAL NOTES z F MOUNTING POST AND SERVICE 2 3" FLANGED SWING CHECK VALVES FURNISH AND INSTALL EBARA SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS: 00 DESIGN CONDITION: ~ ~ MODEL DVBF 3 HP DISCONNECT W/ LIGHTNING (2) ~3" CAST IRON COUPLING ~ ~ GPM 230 13 FT/TDH ARRESTOR PER LOCAL CODE W/ COMPRESSION RINGS W/ OUTSIDE LEVER AND WEIGHT o o VOLTAGE 208/230 SINGLE OR THREE PHASE (BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR) ~,%f' - DISCHARGE 3" 144 MM IMPELLER MOUNT CONTROL PANEL ON 'r ~ ~ti,\ HINGE SIDE OF ACCESS / ~ 1,~~~ S COVER FOR OPERATOR SAFETY k o o °o ~ ~ 2• SEWAGE PUMP: 1. RATED FOR TWENTY (20) STARTS PER HOUR. ~ c 2. AIR FILLED MOTOR DESIGNED FOR SEWAGE APPLICATION WITH CLASS F INSULATION. 0 0 3 3, DUAL MECHANICAL SHAFT SEALS .(SILICON CARBIDE /SILICON CARBIDE) ~ ~ ~ rt y° , o LOCATED OUT OF THE PUMPAGE, IN A SEPARATE OIL FILLED CHAMBER. r ~ ~ o k ~ 0 22>, CENTER 4• 4, HIGH TEMPERATURE BALL BEARINGS B-10 RATING OF 60,000 HOURS, ~ w o ~ = ° LINE UPPER AND LOWER BEARINGS -SINGLE ROW TYPE. ~ ~ ~ r~' G~ rr2 ~ ~ r~~.~ ~ o o ~ 5. 5. PUMP SHAFT HORSEPOWER (BHP) SHALL NOT EXCEED MOTOR RATED HORSEPOWER ~ ~ x ~ J k o 0 o e .7... , o0 00 THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE OPERATING RANGE OF THE PUMP PERFORMANCE CURVE. ~ ~ % . ~ ~J~~ ~u~v, 6. SINGLE PHASE MOTORS SHALL BE DUAL WOUND, CAPACITOR START-RUN AND CAPABLE OF OPERATING ON 208 230 VOLT WITH A 10~ TOLERANCE VOLTAGE F OW PER LOCALCCODE ~ ~~f s. 01PERA ~ G 60N 2O8/230HVOLT WITORA 10%LTOLERDNCE VOLTAD E NDgOCAP0AB2604F ~ Z ~ (NOT SUPPLIED BY TSC) OR OPERATE ON 460 VOLT BY CHANGING THE MOTOR LEADS INSIDE THE PUMP. Z p ~ ~ (3) 3" FLANGED RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVES FI 0 PLAN W~ OPERATING SHUTOFF HAND WHEEL FIBERGLASS WET WELL: SHALL BE A ONE PIECE UNIT WITH INTEGRAL BOTTOM, WALL ~ U a ~ AND UPPER FLANGE. THE ENTIRE FIBERGLASS WET WELL SHALL HAVE A DYNAMIC a a a a LOAD RATING OF 16,000 FT/LBS. EACH UNIT MUST BE SERIAL -NUMBERED TO a ~ w . ~ 466" ROUND 6000# LOAD RATED ALUMINUM TOP IDENTIFY THE TEST PROCEDURE. ASTM D 3753 8c H-20 SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE WW s^:: REQUIRED AS MINIMUM. W ~ h ~ 48" X 48" X 36" COMPOSITE VALVE BOX (H-20 RATED) AL FL DEP-LOCKABLE CONTROL ALUMINUM TOP 48" X 48" DOUBLE DOOR LOCKABLE HATCH ALUMINUM HATCH: TSC MODEL-66R (66") ROUND WITH 30" X 48" LOCKABLE HATCH, A ~ O N REINFORCED FOR LOAD RATING OF 300 LBS/FT WITH HOLD OPEN SAFETY ARM, a ~ LOCKING DEVICE FOR HASP TYPE PADLOCK AND STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE, t7 p Z PANEL GENERATOR RECEPTACLE SS HINGES AND HARDWARE 300 P.S.F. LOADING (2) GAS-TIGHT SEAL OFFS 30" X 48" LOCKABLE HATCH SS y Y' ° HINGES AND HARDWARE 300 PSF LOADING VALVE BOX: FIBERGLASS COMPOSITE (H-10 TRAFFIC RATED) WITH INTEGRAL BOTTOM. ~ ~ U (FOR 4" DISCHARGE PIPING FXF HEADER. SYSTEM) E-+ 1 F G JUNCTION BOX SHALL BE 48" X 48" X 36" WITH ALUMINUM TOP 48" X . 48" DOUBLE DOOR LOCKABLE HATCH, REINFORCED FOR LOAD RATING OF 300 LBS/FT, 42" VENT C6) HOOK SS CABLE HOLDER LOCKING DEVICE FOR HASP TYPE PADLOCK AND STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE. (2) ~1" SS GUIDE RAIL BRACKETS BYPASS CONFORMS TO ACCESSORIES: 304 S/S -GUIDE RAILS, UPPER GUIDE RAIL BRACKETS, CABLE LOCKING HASP (2) SS Ll~f CHAINS 64-604.4(2)(A)F.A.C.~ HOLDER, ANCHOR BOLTS AND PUMP LIFTING CHAINS. VALVES :SHALL BE SEWAGE SERVICE DESIGN LEVER AI~l~) WEIGHT CHECK VALVES ~ ~ H EL. 28.0 4 ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TO P .AND RESILIENT SEAT GATE VALVES OPEN 100 WITH 2 SQUARE OPERATING NUT, ~ Q ~ FIELD INSTALL Pl DUCT SEAL 24" E-~ PIPING: 3~~ SCHEDULE 80 PVC. ~ W F 37" ~l Q FLOAT SWITCHES: UL LISTED SJ ELECTRO MODEL (SJ 30 SWENO), PUMP SUPPLIER SHALL PROVIDE SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS, SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES, Z CONTROL PANEL, JUNCTION BOX, FLOAT SWITCHES, ALUMINUM HATCHES AND ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~2) ~2~~ ACCESSORIES TO INSURE PROPER OPERATION AND WARRANTY. ® ~ ~ CONDUITS ° ° - - o - THE COMPLETE PACKAGE PUMPING STATION SHALL HAVE PUMP BASES, ~ ~ ~ SLIDE RAIL ASSEMBLIES AND DISCHARGE PIPING ASSEMBLED BY ~ (2) 6" X 6" X 9' TECHNICAL SALES CORPORATION READY TO SHIP -FOR FIELD INSTALLATION. ~ ~ CONCRETE POSTS i BOTTOM 9LOPE5 N dUN THE MANUFACTURER OF PRE-FAB PUMP SOLUTIONS© W ~ TECHNICAL SALES CORPORATION, 4621 N. HALE AVE TAMPA, FL 33614 (813)876-9256 ~ ~ ~ SCH 80 PVC INLET ~ TE PIPE FIELD LOCATED i FACTORY INSTALLED ~2" PVC w Q ~ U W ~ DISCHARGE ~3" LINK-SEAL THLS-300S TYP ~ ~ ) ~ ) TECHN CAS SAFES CORPORAT ON Z U U Z EL. 15.23 ~ SCH 80 PVC PIPE 4621 N. HALE AVENUE o o w INLET ~ i FOR PUMP DISCHARGE PIPES TAMPA, FL 33614 a a 813 876-9256 FAX 813 874-1194 EL. 2" X 2" RUBBER COUPLING Y Y 0] HIGH LEVEL ALARM ~ ~ (2) ~3 SCH 80 PVC DISCHARGE PIPES EBARA 80 DVB, DVBF 3, 5 HP DVF 7.5 HP Synchronous Speed; 1800 RPM ~ EL. 14.23 I WET WELL - H=20 TRAFFIC RATED Single up to 5 hp and Three Phase 3 or 4 Inch Discharge Design, flow, GPM ~ TDH/FT ~ ~ ~z LAG PUMP ON ~ FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYESTER Qw 60 ~ o EL. 1323 2 ~ MONOLITHIC DESIGN ASTM D3753 3~~ SOLIDS ~ LEAD PUMP ON i (2) EBARA PUMPS 54 18D o ~ ~ Mm ~'S NP F~t~ D ~ ~ U EL. 10.73 ~ ~ EBARA LM80 QDC GUIDE RAIL SYSTEM-FOR PUMP REMOVAL WITHOUT ENTERING WETWELL 4D ~ F ~ w PUMP OFF (OSHA & 10 STATES STANDARDS EQUIPMENT) 165mm 5 NP p v=i ~ o = 30 ~Ll D~q, N N i (2) 80 X 80 FLANGE ELBOWS o r~4m ~ ~ 20 13D~m m 3 NP FO<< Dj of ~ I IMBEDDED FIBERGLASS REINFORCING 'C' CHANNEL 3 NP D~q N o 0 ~ ~ IS INTEGRAL TO BOTTOM rRry ~ ai 10 a o 0 N O 60" I.D. 4" X 4" FILLET (FACTORY INSTALLED FIBERGLASS) Z D:W>-N-OZN CONCRETE BALLAST AS REQUIRED (FIELD INSTALLED) 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 456 50D w w Capacity US GPM ? ..e., . STATION DEPTH = CONCRETE = 3,699 LBS/CU YD EL. 10.73 s . D 4 I~ ~r. EBARA 80 DVB, DVBF 3, 5 hp DVF 7-5 hp January 2002 °w ~ 5 FT X 8 FT REQ. 9,788 LBS = 2.65 YDS BOTTOM a. , • 1.2"°: ' ' g,;' a A , . ` 5 FT X 10 FT REQ. 12.235 LBS = 3.31 YDS JUN Q9 ao~ W ° I ~ 5 FT X 12 FT REQ. 14,682 LBS = 3.97 YDS L i. r~ VCS PLAN CITY 4~ vl~ ~ . 24" ~I d 5 FT X 14 ~I" REQ. 17,129 LBS = 4.63 YDS FLOW CALCULAITONS: ~W ..SECTION 5 FT X 20 FT REQ. 24,470 LBS = 6.62 YDS (324 UNITS)(250 GAL./UNIT)+(18,893 S.F. RETAIL)(0.1 GPD) o~ = 82,889.30 GPD ZW DRAWN BY: RJM DCAI/ n n~nr. i ~rIt r11 1 LIIYY. CHECK BY: KEZ (82,889.30 GPD)(1 DAY/1440 MLB.)(4 PF) ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 = 230.20 GPM PEAK SHEET 9 of 12 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 ~ . _ f~~ ~ z i:! z I~ - , z l , a.. f~ ~ g TREE REMOVAL L[ST (Harmon VWaQe ~ Iahmd Vlen) PALM REMOVAL LIST (Harrlaoa VWaaY & hived View) n Tm Nnmber Sloe Tie Rol Tree Number Slzc Tie Rol ( a 38" Live Oek 4.0 33 l0" Sabel Pekin 3.0 d ~t 38 35" Live Oak 3.5 $4 l0" Sabel Palm 3s 40 7" Holly 3.5 46 12" 3abal Palm 3s 42 26" Laurel Oak 3.0 49 12" Sabel Palm 3s 46 30" Live Oek 3.0 SO 10" Sabel Pekin 4.5 53 12" LaunlOak 3.0 51 10" Sabel Palm 3.0 ~ 60 6" Hiclrory 3.0 52 10" Sabel Palm 3.0 , 63 4" Hickory 3.0 54 l0" Sabel Palm 3.0 - 1~, 1 ~ 64 14" Lrn Oak 3.0 66 l l" Washington Palm 3.0 69 10" Norfolk Pine 3.5 67 l l" Washington Palm 3.0 ~ 71 10" Lrn Oak 3.0 66 11" Washington Palm 3.0 u 72 28" Live 0ek 3.5 78 10" Washngton Palm 3.0 ' TREE REMOVAL LIST 312404 North Oaceab Averce PALM REMOVAL LIST (312404 North Deceo49veare) PALM REMOVAL L15T (312.404 North Oaceda Avenre) I ( ) 73 40" Live Oak 4.0 103 10" Sabel Palm 3.0 - 74 50" Live Oek 3.5 107 12" Sabel Pekin 3.5 PLANT LIST Q ~ Tree Number She Tie Rath Tree Number Sire Tie ~ Tree Number Size Tie Rat 75 6" Slash Pine 3.0 l08 14" Sabel Palm 3.0 76 6" Slash Pme 3.0 l09 11" Sabel Palm 3.5 ~ 2 12" Podocagws 3.0 8 6' Caney Islaod Patin 3.0 89 30 Sabel Pabn'? 5.5 77 13" Cape Myrtle 5.0 1l0 13" Sabel Patin 3.5 TREE$ 3 9" Live Oak 3.0 9 12' Sebal Palm 3.0 90 30' Sabel Palm 5.0 81 8" Crape Myrtle 3.5 113 12" Sabel Palm 3.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~E ~ ~ 6 10" Laurel Oak 3,0 10 13' Sabel Palm 3.5 91 20' Sabel Patin" 4.5 114 12" 3abal Palm 4.0 62 a Crape Myrtle 3s 22 QV Quercus Vlrglrnana, Llve Oak 2112" CAL (10' HT.J '2" CAL. (10' HT.) . ~ I l 39" Live Oak 3.5 20 16' Sabel Patin 4.5 93 12' Sabel Yabr? 3.5 86 42" Lrn Oak 4.5 115 13" Sabel Palm 3.5 ~ „ " 58 AR Arecastrum Romanzoffianum, Queen PaIm,10'-12' 19 28 Live Oak 3.0 27 10 Sabel Palm 3.0 94 10 Sabel Pabt? 3.5 88 25" Live Oak 3.0 120 12 Sabel Palm 3.0 yen PaIm,10'-12' C.T.H. z ; " ~ 2b 28" Live Oak 3.0 30 26' Sabel Palm 3.0 95 11' SabalPabi 3.0 g9 22" Live Oak 3.0 128 13" sebalPebn 3s 10 Lf Lagerstroemia India, Crepe Myrtle, (10' HT. MULT e, (10' HT. MULTI-TRUNK ~ ~~`U,~ 28 20" Red 3,5 36 20' o Palen : 3.0 103 21' Sabel Palm 5.0 " , , ~y Q~ 90 24 LiveOalr 3.a 129 11 sabalPalen 3s 11 MJ Phoenix Daclylifera, Medjool Palm, (10-12 C.T.H.) 29 12" Ltanel Oak 3.0 39 10' Sabel Palm 3.0 104 18' Sabel Palm 5.0 91 15" H' 3.5 142 11" Washmgton Palm 3.0 t10~-12' C.T.H.) ~ ~ ~ V" ~ 33 27" , Hwy 4.5 44 25' Queen Palen ' 4.0 105 21' Sabel Patin 4.5 " ~ 12" Sebal Patin 3.0 U) z ~ , ~ ~ 40 12" LaunlOak. 3.0 46 12' Sabel Patin 3.5 106 20' Sabel Patin 4.5 ~ 15" Htckasy 3.5 149 SI1rUbS 4B 27" Live Oak 4.0 47 20' Sabel Patin 3.5 108 18' Sabel Patin 3.5 ~ 14 Hrclooay 3.5 97 9" CrapeMyrtk 3.0 1'OTALPALMSTOIiEREMOVED=2s 320 H Hibiscus Rosa Sinensis, Hibiscus, 3 GAL.; (2' HT.); !GAL.; (2' HT.); 2.5' O.C. ~ 51 14" Lrn Oak 3.0 52 20' Sabel Pabn " 5.0 110 15' Sabel Palm 3.5 98 9" Lrape Myrtle 3.5 210 VS Viburnum Suspensum, Sandankwa Viburnum, 3 GA 74 29" Live Oak 3.5 53 11' Sabel Palm ; 3.0 111 15' Sabel Palm 4.0 101 9" Crape Myrtle 3.0 Viburnum, 3 GAL., (2' HT.); 3' O.C. f^' ~ ~ ~ ~y 87 B" Hickory 3.5 6s 11' Sabel Palm ` 3.0 112 2d sabot Palen 4.5 l02 !ly' M a,o 328 RI Raphlolepis Indlca, India Hawthorn, 3 GAL., 30" O.C, 3 GAL., 30" O.C. - '1 I W ~ ' 97 11" Hickory 4.5 69 24' SabalPahn ' 4.0 113 lr SabalPabn 4.5 5" ~ Y~ 3.U 359 PTV PittospOrum Tobira "Varia," Verigeted Plt6ospONm,: 102 23" Laurel0ak 3.5 71 23' Sabel Palm;.: 5.0 114 2ty Saba) Palm 3.5 121 M 3.0 15 0 1 NO Nerium leander Petite Salmon .Dwarf Oleander :d Pittosporum, 3 GAL., (2' HT.); 2.5' O.C. ~ > ~ Dwarf Oleander, 3 GAI.., (2' HT.); 2.5' O.C. ~ U 129 25" Live Oak 3.5 72 22' Sabel Palm 5.0 115: 16' Sabel Palm 4.5 124 10' Crape yrtk , , , 125 !0' Crape Myrtle 3.0 6 20' Sabai Palm 5.0 " TOTALINCHES 334 10' Date Pekin Cluster 5.0 11 75 .0 126. 5 Bald ss 3 Cypre " " . 2tY Sabel Palm 5.0 " 78 10' Date Pabn Gloater 4.5 117 0 127 6 gala sa 3. 60 IV I Iex Vomitoria Nana Dwarf Yau n Holl 2 HT. ~ Po Y. { ca n Holly, {2' HT.); 2.5' O.C. 4,5 11B 19' Sabel Palm 4.5 , 79 20' SebalPalm' , r' Bald se 3.0 131 cyPre 24 IM Ixora Maul, Ixora Maul, 3 Gal.; 2.5 O.C. 80 12' Sabel Palm' 3.0 119 20' Sabel Palm 4.5 132 19" Live Oak 3.5 ~.C. Bl 32' Sebal Patin 5.0 124 I8' Sabel Palen 3.5 144 20" live Oak 3.0 82 20' SebalPabn 4.0 160 16" Hickory 3,0 GroundCOYer 83 2U SebalPahn 5.0 TOTAL PALMS TOBEREMOVED=46 TOTALINCHE5 634" 5Q TJ" TrachelOSS ermumJasmin01d88 COnfederatedasml p ~ P 525 LM Lirio a Muscari, Bi Blue Lill Turf, 3 GAL.;1,5' O.C. mfederate Jasmine,1 GAL.; 2 O.C. ~ ~ ~ GAL.;1.5' O.C. c~ a U a ~ _p 9 Y oa t~ a a w ~ ~ A ~aw I ~ off ~~w~ i ii' fl. ~ r~ T GRAPHIC SCALE.. ~ r ~ w zo o ~o so ,o ~ a ' Q'i i` U :f') Cd lr 7 1. + i _ 1 I~ ~ ~ finch = 20 it i4, i ~ 1 j ~ ~ ~ t _ , 7 ~ ~.1%~ `j! ~ ~-~u t~ r;' i ~ ` I tOcO o~a'i is r.t~rs~ ~"f., i !1 +Jp7 Uk{1 rn i J,)rJC, ~ ; 1Ss - ,i s~ n. + 1 I ,.:E.~ ICJ C7 . T . - 1J >r a, ar. f ~I ~ r4~;~~i ~ A H 4! ~ !i } .a' I ~ ~ ' ~,i a r1 ?:~i ' • cot ~ M u ~ ~T , F-~-I ~ F ~ ~r4i.I I 'JVtI.'1~ i,. ,i ~ , _ rJ cl.1h ! ICI J ~ t~~ y,I~ ~ W i~ t f la r , _ ' 1 rt.,5.) „ ~ w _l.. ''o i~ _ ..rv t , ~ w ~ r , ,r i. ~ nr. Ix ~i ~V I. ~ r~~ ~ ._1. .rv n ',I 1'?..8,55 VJ, 7 ~ 39,&b /,~,~-~~U;67 r" il: 4 _ ~ ~ >~t-, ,~~t ;~~'1' _8:19 28.94 ~ I ~ .?8.41 ~ ~ 28.66 ~ .il ~ n ~ ~-i.~~ ~ ~LJZ- n ry 2a.7~~, EORGIA STREET .,a~z ~ ; ~ ' ; ~ ~ 40, RIW I •j- sa. is :ti1 1 ~ + ~ ~ .L f . , . 1 riZ( ~ ,ti I 7f i. X x 4v ~ .I r _NC ~I AL w t 4 ~ t r u •~J 12- GhS ~ 12?., . J 1 T5 Y' ~ ~ ~ ` - i ~ , I x , ~ - F _ ~ L ~ . - - . . h r ~ ~ , t 1 , ~ ,30.0 ~ t~,'I - `1, r , 1 5~1.J~ ~ . _ , _ ; ~ ~ ~ . - , , , C C i~~ ~~•1 ~ F~ z ~r1 ~ ~ ~r v . - ` + n ' ~ . I; - ~ ~ , I~ / _ I 1 ~ 0 } ; , it ~ „ i;t f + ~ \ + + I ~ ~ - " ~ ~ i .r ~.S y~ I J1 - Gr 1.' y , e i o 0 e ` / . O O i~ 5. / i"; uw'1 i l ..r , ~ i ' ~ I \ . I! : ri ! X I~ ` ~J H RRIaOiV R~ ~ ~ ~ i:i _ . . . . o ~ 20 CC~I~~f~E~CIAL ~~~NiERCIA , MJ I ~ Q W ~ Dra; ~ ' ~ Drcr,. ~ , r.~ - r : : / DtCli ~ ` DECK I ; _ ~ ''~'`Y; ^ y , ` Y , . , 1 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ , I. 3, 7,25 SF ~ ) ~;h _ ail - i ± a r` 3R. ~ FFE = 32.5 ~ " z ~ ' „ .y' ~ ~ II ~ ~ I ~ ° ~ o ~ PTV ~ F ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , . a 3,j-,,Y 25 ~ U a I ~u~ ~ ~ X / X ~ ! A . I ~ . AR LM AR ~ ~ N 20, 25 , , ~ ~ r'~ ; ' , LM tr, r5 ~ " ~ ,I ~ ~'JI,{} - H ~ , r r I ~ s a _ Ii ~ ~ ' L ~ ~t) t3 45 ~ . l,, pr ~;~~~6 ~'I ii i 6 _ ~ W t If I ~ r r' Nr ; , {'i\ 1. ii ~ ~ CJ;, ~ , i ~ AR 4 ~ ~ u r~ ~ lu I / v , ' I ~ F I 4~ ~s ~ I- . a ,,i i ~ CCU: , ~Eh9 3 ~ } ~5 ' ~ ~ ~ X ~ ~ r - ~ - r ~ _ : - X, ~I X ' ~ - _ - - ~ X ~ , _ ~ X „ I - ,-r ~ tz i'- ~ Q. i ( I I I I ~ ''t' LM ~ ,~•r ;--h ~ co of ~ Y 15 i 29 ~ ~ ~ 1 t ,r, cv o Q _ U I \ - r _ r = FFE = 22.0 ~I' ~ 'a. N'~ 0 : , I I ~ 1- ~ h ~ I ' ~ `7 a~ l~~ , 3 I ~ ~ Z 7 err ii, ~ i ` ~ , - I I _ I ' h. ~ RI i Ii rs ~W~-N-02N 1 I J _ 1 EL'i~T~ICj; I, I , i - ~ ; ~T v v I 1 I X !,X X _ ~ ~ x r - ~ , ~ ~ i : G',fi` 20 ~ r' ~ . ' ~ 4 a z .r , ' r h.. , : I _ L - ~;L.... ~ ~ i i _ - - % ~ - c~ PN - a- - _ <; ~ t(~ v~ r ~ AR 25 ~ ~ ;r 2 o i r,, , „ X, - ~ I .r r v ~ ~ r LM a~f r ~ , ( i ~ ii} ~ 50 ~ ~ ~`J rJ ~ ~ DECK i h i ~ .,~,"!:St_i, ~ >I ~~:~1~ i_. ~ - `1 DECK ~ DECD ~ ' ~ I ' ' ' ~ ? "3 ~,a i i n ~ y.. I ~ DECK I r, ~ ~ I _ it - ~v: ~ ~ X r _ I ~ ~ DECK r , ~ -7-~ _ ; ~ : ~ . , ~ ~ 1~-~-~-~..~.~ Si-~-~- ~ it , ~ a ~ ~ 78.~'i 1H, a i78.;i` ~ ~ .,a - ! ~ I <<' ~4~t,,j~, is ~ ~ _ , . z: ~ N ~1ENT S ~fi -~-oar- ~ ~ ~ I ~ _ r: I _ I ' .i t n i ~ ~ ~J ~~i ; ~ ~,t~~i, ~ . C CIF.AAWA i ~ , : ( .i !28.6 RI +I I P7V ) r. _i~ ~J.. ,aN ~ \ 1.: ; I i i I _I .u /7 i o / 4 a , I lI )NNIRh.~ u~~ u I I I 1 %5~. ''r 1~J.L'7_, AR r~ Ii I, ~ ~ 25. tl7 ~'~F~ I z~i I _ `3 _ MATCH LINE SEE SH ~r'~11 ! I I~~n: ( i h A( DRAWN BY. RJM - ~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~I~i~iir ~~~m Inkmm~~~~~~~ ~Yti~~~ 1 CHECK BY, KEZ i PERMIT SET ONLY ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 O SHEET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 10 OF 12 f ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 gg Y i rs~rf ~t z r IGf ~{k I i ,~N~r~`T~^.r MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 10 ( ~ ~.-~~..~.~...~..~.......~......e¦......-~~.. sse~..-......~ .-.~~..r~ ~ Y ~ Y 1 Z • i i .T ~ i~ X :.11•'v141;`, : . R'.. ',h,:.';4,:.'• 1.,1~ . I •t p: ~ i 1. .I X _ _ _ v I~ W ' i ' ~ , v , IL r ~ i~;l I ~ _ - i . ' , I aR ~ RET ~L'~' ~~'S~~",~ ,`s sl ~ I-,¢~~: i a ~ , i:~ I LAND VIEVIj' ~u r , ~ .•r, I & A ACHED'UN TS . 'r f - 14r - \ ' 1 I jai ~f~ j ri ~ q ' ; . ~ l ~ ' ,123.87 SF - , . . , „ : , .~.:i li - ( ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ ~f , . , . _ _ . yr...,..__.......... ; f, ~ ' ti " RI fir, i ~ I ~f ~f~:~ ~ it I i q _ I ~ y % t J r l t ' 25 a ~~'~i 't 9i, , n c ~ I ~ ~ f. I ~ X' .r' L.:. i i w . by ~ r X, s~', X " ~ I ~ ~ Fwd i X .~,o.., . X X ...r...__.._....._.. X , ~ ; • ( ~ ~Illit I'y~} rayp' . X • • / ~ , fir) 2 r ~ I ~ I I~ ~ r , i 1. ~ f I ~ i' dfL 4r ay~~~ y I , j ~ N gad; d, ~e / f ~ ~ + ~ f+l roe - PN ~ 30 Z~~ ~ ~ • . Y . .,.i _ I . / i X i ,I! ~ t ~ i~ ~ I / / f. ' i .r.7i ' ~ 20 X ii ~ .I? i r I ~ Up ~ ~ PN Z ~ ~ x • i x x x x ~ X j x ' ~ ~ _ • • 1 _ ~ • a~~s~ X ~ ~ ~oa~~~e~ ~ I i _ ~ i / ~ X . 2 PN AR ~ v r ; Q ~ • : • ~ .Y. ' / / 23 A s ail L: , , 1 ~ t3 ~ X X j 2.20 ' .I, ~ pi W / ~ it •i II 5 L e ~.~d ii f , , 1 25 O z , 1/ / n . t ~ Iii; .~.'.'fi- i W t a I i! i ' ti. !i ~ f I ~ U ij :I fij ..i : 1; ~ ' i, ..,f .II .~a.....~.....: IE. ~ ~FE - 22.00 i ~ , ( I' _ . , / .,y~ Z%t : ~ , ~ ~.r~~ ~Y~ t ti• / I I li e ~ u 4i ~ % , N ~i I;~ ~5 '`fly'/ r~ ' ~~c(',,tr(YY,',,Ch` , ~ s .r^' , ~ _ ~C) r - j 4 X X ~ ~ ..:.a y' 'v~. \ ' IJJ ~ 1 ~ ~ II ~ ~ le{ II _ 4, ~j ~I . v , • r r.. : • 'I ~ I I , Q ~ I I 'r, ~ ~ y a ~ ~ ~ N , X ~ ~ ;J ~ , `st,ssr ~ .20 :6 7.. r.~ ~1.. ` 7 ' W / ~"rq I t i i ..l r `F ~i . i r~ .4.! 14s ):i. < X X , ~ ,i , , ~ . ~ X .f - r ~ . ~ . : ~ X . ~I f ,r X ~ ~ ~ i ~ , , ~ ,50 , ~ r v'Li~t~ ~ . 7 h z w ~~em~~s~~~~ lel~ r, Ili,i.l~~il \ j~ ~ > iqs , ~ - ; ~ X ~ • ` • • i ~R~T h.& U ID'S >~h . e¦ . e¦ / 1 W .4 ' ~r., ~ <<<~ 11, 5a~~94 ' x X X ~ 1 ~ 1 ; ~ ~ X N0 l ~/i RI f r ~ ~ u~, ~~f o H 5 I 100 p p e e 4 H 75 l N t. 20 ~ ~ ~ N . (rI PN 75 ' 2 I r # r a ~~~yy I'"'~ 1 X XX i' u u o , 4 c., MJ W I \ + + + + ~ii 2 ov \ ° ° ' 3 ~ _ / 3 x IV ~ ~ I ~ i/ ~ W v-------'---- - - XX ~ ~ ~ / / ; : H Z \ OV OV / / . / / y ( / / ^ OV / ~ ~ V W, 0 X a zu 2 ~ ~ i ~ ~ a ~ \ ~ 4- ' / 1. Z a X ~ p p 1 LM ~ LI.~ V U Z QV , ~ ~ . ~ / ' / ~ 60 • r ~ / ' ~ ~ ~ PN o o w ~ ~ ~ a a ~ + ~ + RI ~ 21 < / ~I ~ ~ i 40 ~ P "ro M J N N ~ ~1 ' Y Y m i . ~ D ~ " 3 ~~1 • I :i. ~ • . i 1 , '1 0 ~ • AR •UP 1 I. dip o TREE REMOVAL LIST rHerrlson VYY~e & Lhnd Vlnr) PALM REMOVAL LISP (Harrison ViWte ~ Lmad Vlerr) i Tree Number Sias 7~e ~ Tree Number slue T~e•, ~a GRAPHIC SCALE I 17 36" LiveOak 4A 33 10" 9ebelPaim 3,0 38 3S" LiveOak 3.5 34 10" SebalPalm 3J 20 0 20 0 1 40 40 ~ ~ `J ~ 25 ' ~ ~ 0 • " 40 7" HoSy 33 48 12 Sabel Palen 3S v I ' ~ ~ X a ~ 42 26" LwrelOak 3.0 49. 12" Sabel Palm 3S I~ 46 30" LiveOek 3.0 SO 10" Sabel Palm 4,5 ' r t +r- r MJ ~ ~ I S3 ' • 12" Lwrol Oek 3.0 Sl 10" Sabel Palm 3,0 60 6 Hidcoty 3,0 52 10 Sabel Palm 3.0 ~ ~ " 34 10" Sabel Palm 3,0 63 4 H 3.0 iekotp " " a 20 ,5 _ ~ HAFT ISaN~: • N o 0 , ~ . , 1 inch it. n PaM 30 66 11 Wes i 64 14 LiveOak 3.0 bbigto 69 10" Norfolk Pine 3.5 67 11" Washmg6on Paln? 3.0 71 10" LhroOek 3A 68 11" WeshingtonPalm 3.0 " " • ~+~I~~1~~~1 ~ IL :I~II:IIII~R~CIL~ q b ob venue 72 zs Liveok 3S 78 10" WeshbyltonPolm 3,0 PLANT LIST ' TREE REMOVAL LL4T (31204 Nort Once A ) PALM REMOVAL LIST (312.404 North Qxxom Avenue) lALM REMOVAL L1ST (312404 North tAceala Avemu) ~ 40" Live Oak 4.0 103 10 Sabel Pelm 3.0 " 2" 3ebd Palm 3S 107 1 S 50 Live Oak 3 74 Tree Nntober Sla 1~e Ilet Tm Nuudxr She Tyke Ret Trce Number Slze T,,,y~e Rat 75 6" Slash Plne 3.0 106 14" Sabel Pebn 3.0 t~ t, r .7- ~ ~ GCW~-N~OZN 76 6" Sb>'h Pma 3A 109 11" Sabel Pabn 3.5 TREES - . N- N " 2 12 ua 3A Palm 3.0 30' Sabel Palm ss 8 s Island 89 +m 3s 13 Sabel Palm 10 ~Y SA 1 77 13 3 9" Live Oak 3A 9 12' Sebat Palm 3.0 90 3lY Sabel Palm SA " ~ l2" Sabel Palm 3.S 22 QV Quereus Virginians, Uve Oak, 2112" CAL. (10' HT.) 61 B M 33 113 ~ Y~ "CAL: (10' HT.) ~ z `r , y` 6 10" LamelOak 3A 45 " ¦ 10 13~ sebet Palm 3.5 91 20' Sabel Palm B2 8 (hype MyeUe 3S 114 12 Stbel Palm 4.0 56 AR Arecestrum Romanzoffianum, Queen PaIm,10'•12 I 11 39" Live Oak 3S 20 16 Sabel Palm 4.5 93 12 Sabel Palm 3S B6 42" Live Oak 4.5 115 13" Sabel Palm 3.5 , an PaIm,10'•12' C.T.H.. / ~ . , ~ ~ 19 28" LiveOek 3.0 27 10' SabetPalm 3.0 94 10 salialPamr 35 " " 10 LI Lagerstroemla India, Crepe Myrtle, (10 HT. MULTI. M 25 LrveOak 3A 120 l2 SebelPebu 3.0 " ~ (10' HT. MULTI-TRUNK / : `Y ` r ~ zb 2e Liveoak 3A 1 sabelPatin 3A " " 11 MJ hoenix Dac a eel oo a 0'- T. 3o zb sebel Palm 3.0 9s 1 3s P Ilf re M I P Im 1 12 C. H. 89 22 LfveOek 3.0 126 13 3abalPelm ty , ~ 28 20" Red Bey 33 36 20' Queen Palm 3.0 103 21 Sabel Pebn S.0 90 y4" ~ O~ 3.0 129 11" Sabel Palm 3S Y ~ " .a. ' N LeurclOak 3A 0 " 29 12 39 10' Sabel Palm 3.0 104 IS' Sabel"Palm S. 2 u w Palm 3.o Shrubs 14 3.5 1S 27" H' 4S' SabelPalm 4.5 91 ""~tckary eshbigton 33 " ~ 44 2s QuemPeka 4.0 305 21 g2 1S Hickory 33 149 12 SebalPaim 3.0 320.:. H Hibiscus Rosa Sinensis Hibiscus 3 GAL.' 2' HT. ' 2, 40 12 Causal Oak 3A 46 12 .Sabel Palm 3.5 106 20' Sabel Palm 4.5 g4 t4" Hkkary 3.5 , ~ , ( • ~ ~ ~ ~ • JUN 0 GAL.; (z' HT 2 5' o.c ~ 4 ~ 9 48 27" Live Oak 4A 47 20' Sabel Palm 3.5 .108 18' SatialPalm 3.5 97 9" CrapeMynk 3.0 TOTALPALMSTOBEREMOVED¦25 21D VS ' VlbumumSuspensum,SandankwaVibumum,3GAL sl la" Liveoak 3A s2 2a sebeleabn s.o Ito 1s sabdPam, 3s 328 RI Ra hiole islndia IndlaHawthOm 3GAL. 30"O.C. Jibumum, 3 GAL., (2' HT.); 3' O.C. ~ ° ? ~ r~ ~ > ~ . 'rte 98 9" Ctape MytOe 3.5 P p , , , 74 z9" L{ve0ak 3s s3 li' cabal Balm 3A 111 is sabalPalm 4.0 lol 9" ezapeMyrlk 3.0 359 PTV Pittosporum Tobin "Varla," Var'igated Pittosporum, 3 GAL., 30" O.C. d Pittosporum, 3 GAL., (2' HT.); 2.5' O.C. , ~ 87 8 H 3S 66 11 5ebel Palm 3.0 112 20' Sabel Palm 4.5 " 102 10 CtapeMyrde 4.0 '115 NO Nerlum Oleander "Petite Salmon"Dwarf Oleander 97 11 Hiciwry 4.3 69 ?a 5ebal Patin 4.0 - 113 IT Sabel Palm 4.5 121 S" Hiclwty 3.0 ' ' ' IwarF Oleander, 3 GAL., (2' HT.); 2.5' O.C. RI u IM IM u RI • l02 23" laurel Oak 3.5 7l 23' Sabot Palm SA 114 20' Sabel Palm 3.5 " l24 l0" Ctepe MyAle 3.0 25 t' 12 12 1 25 0 l29 2S Live Oek 3S 72 22' Sabel Palm 5.0 115 16 Sabel Palm 4:5 12S 10" Crape Myrlk 3.0 ' TOTALINCNES 334" 75 10' DetePatmCluster SA 116. 20' Sabel Palm SA 3" BaW 3.0 6D N 118X VOmitori~~a~04~~~y1 2 126 l,(~T.); 2.5' O.C.: z 78 lly Date Palm Cluster 4.5 117 20' Sabel Pam? 5.0 " ~ 127 6 Held Cypsea 3.0 24 IM Ixora Maui, Ixora Maui, 3 Gal.; 2.5 O.C. C. R I G I N DRAWN BY: RJM 79 20 Sebal Palm 4.5 118 19 Sebai Pam? 4.5 ivi H"Id Cvmen 3.0 80 IT Sabal Palm 3.0 119 20' Sabal Palm 4.5 132 19" Live Oak _ 3.5 Groundcover JONES STREET CHECK BY: KEZ 81 32' Sabal Palm 5.0 124 18' Sabal Palm 3.5 144 20" Live Oak 3.0 82 20' SabalPabn 4.0 160 16" Hickory 3.0 50 TJ Trachelosspermum Jasminoides, Confederate Jasmir nfederate Jasmine, I GAL.; Z O.C. 49 ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15.05 83 20' SebalPalm 5.0 TOTAL PALMS TO BE REMOVED ¦46 TOTALINCHES 63a" 525` LM Lirio Musari, 8i9 Blue Lilly Turf, 3 GAL.;1.5' O.C. GAL.; 1.5'0.C. PERMIT SET ONLY SHEET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11 of 12 ISSUE DATE, 06.09.05 V GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. The Landscape Contractor shall grade planting beds, as required, to provide positive drainage and promote optimum plant growth. 2. All recommended trees and plant materials will be graded as Nursery Grade No. 1 or better as outlined by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants", 7th Edition, 1998 as revised from tune to time. ~ U 3. All planting shall be done in accordance with the Florida Nurserymen's and Grower's Associations approved practices. ~ ~ 4. All plants shall be fertilized with Agriform 20-10-5 tablets as per the manufacturers specifications in conjunction with ~..J U note # 5. O Q 5. The planting soil shall be the approximate proportions as follows: 50% sand and 50% organic material consisting of t> native peat, well-decomposed sawdust, leaf mold and top soil. It shall provide a good pliable and thoroughly mixed ~ medium with adequate aeration, drainage and water-holding capacity. It shall also be free of all extraneous debris, ~ U such as roots, stones, weeds, etc. ~ U', 6. All planting areas shall receive a 3" layer of cypress mulch, which is to be watered-in after installation. u1j 7. The plant material. schedule is presented for the convenience of the Landscape Contractor. In the event of a discrepancy between the plan and the plant key, the -plan shall prevail 8. Plants shall meet size, container, and spacing specifications. Any material not meeting specifications shall be removed z L o and replaced at the contractor's expense. ~ ~ ~ ~ r i r, r~ .f ;;i~ t Y 9. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for examining fully both the site and the bid documents, Discrepancies ~ ~ ~ I~ r~' 1 in the documents or the actual site conditions shall be reported to the Landscape Architect IIII ~ f- ~ in writing at the time of bidding or discovery, No account shall be made after contract completion for failure to report W > L ~ such condition, or for errors on the part of the Landscape Contractor at the time of bidding, ~ U ~ 10. The Landscape Contractor shall be responsible for securing all necessary applicable permits and licenses to perform the work set forth in this plan set and the specifications, 11. Plant material shall be bid as specified unless unavailable, at which time the Landscape Architect E-I Z Ln will be notified by in writing of intended changes. Z p ~ 12. -Any and all questions concerning the plan set and/or specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect ~ ~ LrJ at (727) 793-9888 a U ~i C''J 13. There shall be no additions, deletions or substitutions without the written approval of the owner. ~ a ~ w W 14. The Landscape Contractor shall guarantee, in writing, plant survivability for a period of twelve (12) months from final acceptance by the owner. W ~ E-~ ~ 15. All dimensions to be field-checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to landscape material installation. Discrepancies shall A O H be reported immediately to the owner. W W Q'I 16, All materials must be as specified on the landscape plan, If materials or labor do not adhere to specifications, they will ~ ~ IZ' be rejected by the City Project Manager with proper installation carried out by Landscape Contractor at na additional cost, U 17. All permits necessary are to be provided by the installing contractor unless otherwise specifically stated in the specifications ~ ~ ~ ~ U 18. No contractor identification signs shall be permitted on the project, except for the project information signs. 19. Existing sad shall be removed as necessary. to accomodate new plantings. 20. Any .existing .areas that are disturbed during the landscape installation shall be resodded with St. Augustine "Floritam". 21. The Landscape Contractor will be responsible for the collection, removal, and proper disposal of any and all debris generated during the installation of this .project. I ~i 22, All areas disturbed within right of way shall be sodded, Q ~ H di IRRIGATION NOTES ~ w 1. A low volume irrigation system, that provides .100% .coverage to all proposed W plantings, will be designed and installed by the Contractor. Q-I' 1{. 2. The proposed Irrigation System must meet or exceed all applicable City code ~ ~ requirements. (i,e., Back Flaw Prevention, Automatic Rain Shutoff Device, etc...) ~ ~ j Q SPREAD 3, Irrigation system must be inspected and Gccepted by Landscape Architect Z prior to installation of mulch, Irrigation mist meet city code section 3-1203,C ~a a ~a to provide 100% coverage, and include a rain sensor and timer. W a 4, Irrigation as-built drawings, which accurately and clearly identify all modifications o ~ a &/or substitutions, must be submitted prior to final inspection and acceptance, w a a ~ U LJ a Z OJ ~ 5. The Landscape Contractor must coordinate the placement and power supply far the ~ ~ z ~ as HEIGHT fl irrigation control timer with the General Contractor. ~ ~ w MULCH 3` FROM fl MULCH 3` FROM STEMS O O W 6. The following irrigation system components will be utilized, per each manufacturers' a a N 3" MULCH LAYER specifications. 3" MULCH LAYER Toro-Netafim TechLine Self Cleaning, Pressure-Compensating Emitter Line Y Y m HARDIE - Raindial 6 Station Outdoor Control Timer f- t ~ " , \ Richdale - 214APR 1" Electric Valve FERTILIZER TABLETS AS ~ , ~j\\~\ SPECIFIED, PLACE UNIFORMLY ~ y ~ \y Amtec - 10" Round Valve Box. ~ ~ ;~~y'r-, ^'Y' ~j~ , PREPARED PLANITW AROUND ROOT MASS , - j;%\~%i\\%\\%\ PREPARED PLANTING SOIL ~ I ~ ~ ~ Q Q BETWEEN MIDDLE AND ~ , \ ~ \ \ \ W W J J BOTTOM OF ROOT MASS ;\~~_i~~'~/~~ ~%~~'r EXISTING UNDISTUI U U -EXISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL W V. 3 TO 5 TIMES WIDTH OF ROOTBALL PRUNE AND TIE FRONDS ~ O Z F SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL U U a' N,LS, O O N W W p N ~ N ~ O O W TRUNK SHALL BE STRAIGHT ANO n - N O p WITHOUT CUR4E5, FREE OF SCARS, 11 O O BURNMARKS AND 80015 U ~ ~ N p ~ JUN 09 2005 Z C7 D:W~-OT-OZN V Q 'p ~ ~ ALL SHRUBS/I Q ~ i_ ,j i- ALL SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER ~ PLANNING ~EVEI.QPMENT$~~$ W ~ TO BE TRIANG ' ) ; ~ r SEE PLANT LIS TO BE TRIANGULAR SPACING, CI~'Y{~'~CIEARWATER Z SEE PLANT LIST FOR (O.C.) SPACING. V ''t~ ~ s• Z W r+ , <n q'1 ..n. {t i ~ ' rvl., O~ W CZO N 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP, 5 - 2'x4'xl6' WOODEN BATTENS, ~ W s 7 t ~ ,r CONNECTED 'MTH 2-3/4" STEEL BANDS. U10: Z (3) 2"x4"x36" WOODEN STAKES J ~ ~ ' 1B° MIN, SETS ~~a., & GROUNDC01 s a iB° MIN, SETBACK FOR SHRUBS 7m & GROUNDCOVERS 2'x4` WOOD BRACE (3 EA, MIN.) O NNL TO BATTENS A STAKES i ~I. y~ ~O O.C. SPACING HUED AND LOOSENED 8' SOIL SAUCER ARWND p ~ BACK OF CUF BED LINE BACK OF CUR6~ NABVE SOIL BACKFlLL ~ ~ ~ PLANIINC HIXE. 2 W BED LINE a' MULCH tAY~XISTING UNDISTURBED SOIL PLANT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) RaoreALL ~ a DRAWN BY: RJM~JM N) FEAiIUZER TABLETS ~ ~ ~ i?.t~/. ~ i. N.T.S. AS SPECIFIED PLACE Ktaltt UNIFORMLY AROUND ROOT MASS BETWEEN MIDDLE AND BOTTOM MIN. 3 71MES ME WIDTH ORIGINAL DATE: 04.15905,05 -j I OF ROOT MASS. OF THE ROOTBALL PALM PLANTING DETAIL SHEET N.T.S. 12 of 12 ISSUE DATE: 06.09.05 SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 15 E., ON DESCRIPTI PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA PARCEL ONE: a A POR110N OF LOTS 1 2 AND 3 OF A.B. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS NOTE`'S OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH; RANGE 15 EAST.AND A PORTION , OF LOTS A AND B OF EERGENS REPLAY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 26, PAGE 41 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA i. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF .OSCEOLA AVENUE, BEING ASSUMED AS S00'21'07"E. .r AND A PORTION OF A VACATED ALLEY PER O.R: BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF 1HE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLCIRIDA, ALL EEING h MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: 2. SURVEY MAP AND. REPORT OR THE COPIES THEREOF ARE NOT -VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE- ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND' MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELE110NS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE. SIGNING PARTY. OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED. , AT TH NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 OF JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, -ALSO EEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY BEGIN E RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET AND 1HE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NOR1H FORT HARRISON AVENUE; THENCE ALONG SAID ' WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE S.00'16'19"E., 530,62 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE. NORTHERLY 3. N0 EXCAVATION WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THE .LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF JONES STREET, S.89'59'22"W., 100.00 FEET; 1HENCE ALONG ALINE-100.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WI1H SAID ' ENCROACHMENTS, IMPROVEMENTS, STRUCTURES OR FOUNDATIONS, UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINE LOCATIONS (IF - SHOWN HEREON) ARE BASED UPON UTILITY PR041DER ATLASES AND VISIBLE SURFACE EVIDENCE. WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY. LINE OF N0R1H FORT HARRISON AVENUE N.00'i6'19"W., 528.34 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET N.88'40'45"E., 100.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 4. RE-USE OF THIS SURVEY FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN WHICH ~T WAS INTENDED, WITHOUT WRITTEN VERIFlCAl10N, WILL BE AT THE RE-USERS SOLE-RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY'TO THE SURVEYOR, NOTHING HEREIN SHALL BE - CONTAINING 1.215 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, CONSTRUED TO GIVE. ANY. RIGHTS OR BENEFITS TO ANYONE OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHOM CERTIFIED. PARCEL TWO 5. ALL FOUND POINTS ARE UNMARKED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED'. AlL PERIMETER BEARINGS AND: DISTANCES ARE .PROPOSED OSCEOLA AVENUE ' ALSO RELD MEASURED UNLESS NOTED. ' 6.-THIS SURVEY IS NOT INTENDED TO SHOW THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY JURISDIC110NAL, HAZARDOUS OR A PORTION OF LOTS 1 2 3 4; 5, 6 AND 7 OF A.B. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PAGE 64 OF THE PUELIC ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS. RECORDS.OF PINELLAS COUNTY, flORIDA AND THE VACATED ALLEYS PER O,R. BOOK 7270, PAGE 1731, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH; RANGE 15 EAST AND A 1'ORTI0N OF LOTS A AND B OF 7.'THE SITE-APPEARS TO BE IN FLOOD ZONES. X, AE (EL 12); VE (EL 14) & VE (EL 15), ACCORDING TO THE. FEDERAC,EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FLOOD INSURANCE RAZE-MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER BERGENS REPEAT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 26, PAGE 41 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND A PORTION OF A VACATED ALLEY PER O.R. BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS CO'..!NTY, FLORIDA, AND A POR11ON OF .LOT 3 BLOCK 2 OF JONES SUBDIVSION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARWATER HARBOR AS RECORDED '.N PLAT B0O1( 1;PG. 13, PUBUC.RECORDS OF L E G E N D 12103C0106G, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 {MAP INDEK NUMBER 12103CINDIA, MAP NUMBERS 125096, 125103, 125139 EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 3,,20D3), POLARIS .ASSOCIATES, INC.. AND THE SIGNING SURVEYOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART,. ALL BEING MO~:'E PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED A9 FOLLOWS: HEREON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS gETERMINATION. THE AUTHOR OF THE MAP, 1NE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, OR THE LOCAL GQVERNMENTAL AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER q/C Y BLDG = A/C = AIR' CONDITIONER UNIT ~ SUCH MATTERS SHOULD BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO ANY JUDGMENTS BEING MADE FROM THIS INFORMATION, THE BLDG = BUILDING BACKFLOW PREVENIER ABOVE REFERENCED MAP STATES IN THE NOTES TO THE USER .THAT "THIS MAP IS FOR INSURANCE PURPOSES COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OE SAID LOT 1 OF JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, ALSL BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERL - F-WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT`HARRISON AVENUE THENCE ALONG THE ' ~C) _ RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET AND THE WESTERLY RIGNT 0 (C) = CALCULATED-.DATA • _ BOLLARD or POST ONLY". TO 1H POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE S.00'16'19"E. 528,34 CCR = SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET S.88 40 45 W., 100,02 FEET E , CCR = CERTIFIED CORNER RECORD ®=BOX,: CABLE. TELEVISION - CLF = CHAIN LINK FENCE ` ®-BOX, ElEC1RIC UTILITY 8. ANY ZONING INFORMAl10tti ~ 'l OR NOTED HEREON IS BASED ON INFORMATION .AVAILABLE DURING THE 100,00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH :THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF-NORTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE; CLF FEET ALONG A LINE , CMP = .CORRUGATED METAL PIPE []p =BOX, ELECTRIC UTILITY (1RANSFORM'r'_R) PREPARAl10N OF THE SURVEY. THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED 1Mlli THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY PRIOR TO THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF JONES STREET, S.89'59'22"W., 50.00 FEET; THENCE N.00'16'19"W., 527.20 FEET; CONC = THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET, N.88'40~45"E., 50,01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. _ COR CONC =CONCRETE =BOX; TELEPHONE ANY DETERMINATIONS OR DESIGN. COR = CORNER kf =DECORATIVE LIGHT POLE ' CPB = CPB = CONDOMINIUM PLAT BOOK CONTAINING 0,606 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. C/T = C/T = CURB 11E ~ = FlRE HYDRANT 9. SHOWN ANYWHERE ON THIS SURVEY, THE WORD."CERTIFY" IS UNDERSTOOD TO BE AN EXPRESSION OF A (D) _ PARCEL THREE DB = (D) _ DEED DATA FLAGPOLE PROFESSIONAL OPINION BASED UPON THE SURVEYOR'S BEST KNOWLEDGE, INFORMAl10N AND BELIEF, AND THAT IT DB = .DEED BOOK ~ =FLARED END SECTION THUS CONSTITUTES NEITHER A GUARANTEE NOR A WARRANTY. DIP = EXISTING OSCEOLA AVENUE ECMP = DIP =DUCTILE IRON PIPE ®=GRATE INLET 10: UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AN EASEMENTS SHOWN .WERE FURNISHED TO POLARIS EL = ECMP =ELLIPTICAL CORRUGATED METAL PIPE: ~ =GROUND LIGHT ASSOCIATES, INC.-AND ARE PRESUMED TO BE CORRECL NO S~ARCH OF ANY PUBLIC RECORDS, FOR EASEMENTS, EL = ELEVATION F =GUY ANCHOR DEEDS, ETC., WAS PERFORMED BY PHIS FIRM FOR THE COMPLETION OF THIS SURVEY. A POR110N OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP. 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING THE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY. OF EP = EP =EDGE OF PAVEMENT _ ~ =LIGHT POLE, CONCRETE ' OSCEOLA AVENUE AND A PORTION OF AN ALLEY LUNG NORTH OF LOTS 2 AND 3 OF JONES SUBDIVSION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDI110N TO FRCP CLEARWATER HARBOR AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE. 13 OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA, OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS F FRCP ELLIPTICAL REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE ` : ~ _ LIGHT POLE, METAL 11. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITHOUT. THE BENEFIT OF AN .ABSTRACT OF TITLE AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO (F) _ FIELD DATA ~ _ LIGHT,POLE, WOOD EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS;.RIGHTS-OF-WAY -AND OTHER MATTERS OF RECORD. FORMERLY A PART, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FCM = , FDOT FCM =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT MAILBOX ` COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1 OF JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION, -ALSO BEING THE INTERSECTION OF TILE SOUTHERLY FIR = FDOT = FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -©-MANHOLE, ELECTRIC FIR = FOUND IRON ROD. - 12. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON N,~TIONAL GE0DE11C SURVEY BENCHMARK "429 FLHD" HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 22,51 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET AND THE WESTERLY RIGNT-OF-WAY LINE OF NORITI FORT HARRISON AVENUE THENCE ALONG THE FND = FND = FOUND NAIL` & DISC MANHOLE, `GREASE TRAP AND NATIONAL GE0DEl1C SURVEY BENCHMARK "HARRIS J" HAVING AN ELEVATION Of 30.52 FEET, NORTH T- F-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET S.88'40'45"W. 212,46 FEET TO THE POINT. OF BEGINNING, THENCE ALO~~G'THE EA TERLY FOP- _ SOUTHERLY R GH 0 FOP- = FOUND OPEN PIPE sQ _ MANHOLE; SANITARY SEWER AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM 1988 (NAND 88). FPP = FOUND PINCHED PIPE =MANHOLE; STORM SEWER ' F T• THENC N.89'49'02"E. 49.23 FEET• THENCE ALONG ~iHE WESTERLY FPP = RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA AVENUE, 5.00'19 25 E., 333 32 EE , E BOUNDARY OF A VACATED ALLEY PER O.R. BOOK 7546, PAGE 607, S.OT'Ol'42"E., 12.50 FEET; THENCE S.89'S3'10"W., 66.67 rEET TO A FRRS = FRRS = FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE ©=MANHOLE, TELEPHONE 13. TREES,4" 1N DIAMETER AND LARGER HAVE-BEEN LOCATED Wllli COMMON NAME AND APPROXIMATE DIAMETER NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID F/T _ F/T = FENCE TIE METER, ELECTRIC- ~ BREAST HIGH, SMALLER .TREES, NON-PROTECTED SPECIES (INCLUDING ORNAMENTALS) AND TREES WITHIN EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OFOSCEOLA AVENUE, 15.74 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 20'02'38" CHORD BEARING S.49'19'36"W. _ FXC = , - GE - FXC = FOUND X-CUT ®=METER, GAS JURISDICTIONAL AREAS (IF ANY) HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED. GE _ GRATE ELEVATION ® _ METER, RECLAIMED WATER 15.66 FEET); THENCE 5.00'04 22"E.; 12.90 FEET; THENCE S.79 39'30"W., 80.02 FEET; THENCE S.00'4T26"E„ 12.31 FEET, THENCE N.89'44'18'W., 55.03 FEET;' THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE BY THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES: 1 - IE _ IE = INVERT ELEVATION ®=METER; WATER 14. MEAN HIGH WATER LINE ELEVATION OF 0.42 FEET (NAND 88 BASED ON MHW POINT ID 872-6725, EPOCH I N,00'50'40"E, 59,79 FEET; 2 -THENCE N,89'58'45°E., 121.94 FEET; 3 -THENCE N,00'21'07"W., 334.58 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ~L) _ , (L) = LEGAL DESCRIPTION DATA _ ) LB = LICENSED BUSINESS MITERED END SECTION 1960-1979, 50UTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 11NE OF SAID GEORGIA STREET, N.88'40'45"E., 40,02 FEET. TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LS LS = LICENSED SURVEYOR ' MONITORING- WELL MAS = CONTAINING 0.478 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. - MHW MAS = MASONRY ® _ PEDESTRIAN. CROSSING- SIGNAL MHW = MEAN HIGH WATER ' ~ =SANITARY; CLEANOUT NP = NP = NORMAL POOL ~ =SCHEDULE B-2 ITEM PARCEL FOUR O/A = OR - 0/A =OVERALL ®=TELEPHONE RISER OR = OFFlCIAL RECORDS BOOK _ TRAFFIC SIGN A PORTION OF LOTS 4, ,5, 6 AND 7 AND ALl OF LOTS 8, 9, 10 AND it OF A.B. &JENNIE CATES SUBDIVISION,. AS RECORDS IN PLAT 8001(1 _ (P) = PLAT. DATA ®=TRAFFIC ,SIGNAL- BOX • PAGE 64 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA AND A P0R110N OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SEC11ON 9 TOWNSHIP 29 ~P) _ PB - SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST AND A PORTION OF A VACATED ALLEY PER O.R: BOOK 7546, PAGE 607 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS = PB = PLAT BOOK ®=TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE PG = PAGE ~ =UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION M,',RKER COUNTY FLORIDA AND'A POR110N OF-LOTS 2 AND 3 BLOCK 2 OF JONES SUBDIVISION OF NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO CLEARI'IATER HARBOR AS' PG _ PLS _ PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ®=UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION Wr`,RNING SIGN RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 PG.13 PUBLIC RECORDS OF HILLSEOROUGH COUNTY OF WHICH PINELLAS COUNTY WAS FORMERLY A PART AND A PLS POR110N OF THE.EXISTING RIGNT OF-WAY: OF OSCEOLA AVENUE NORTH AND A PART OF BECKON 9, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, MANGE 15 EAST POB = POB = POINT OF BEGINNING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MARKER POC AND LOT A AND B OF CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 35, PAGE 76 OF THE.PUBLIC.RECORDS OF PINELLAS PRM = POC = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ' LEI PRM = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT '®=UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WARNING S!GN I COUNTY, FLORIDA ANp. A VACATED .ALLEY LYING NORTH OF LOT A OF.SAID CLOVIS C, LUTZ SUBDIVISION, ALL BEING MORE F" ,Z1ICULARLY PSM = _ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; PSM =PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER =UNDERGROUND FIBER OP11C MARKEk, ' I P/T = I rn n _ ,r ,r. _ PVG = P/T = PAVEMENT TIE UNDERGROUND .FIBER OPTIC WARNING' SIGN PVC = POLY VINYL CHLORIDE ~(=UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN MARKERI ' --COMMENCE AT THE NOR11i~nST-CvRNER-0F-SAID LOT i-OF JENN,~~-CATES SUBDI:nS!ON,'ALS0.EEING-TIiE INTERSECTION OF T~,~. SOUTHERLY . HARRI A NU 1HEN~:C ALONG THE RCP = RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET AND THE WESTERLY RIGI;T-OF-WAY LINE OF NORTH FORT SON VE E RLS _ RCP = .REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE ®=UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN WARNING SIGN SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF GEORGIA STREET S,88'40'45"W., 150.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S:00'16'19"E., 451.26 R/W = RLS _ 'REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR ~ =UNDERGROUND-GAS MARKER R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY UNDERGROUND GAS WARNING SIGN i FEET; THENCE S.89'59'22"W., 91,66., FEET; THENCE NAO'04'22"W., 53,92 FEET; THENCE N,89'4 ~ 18"W„ 133.61 FEET, THENCE !.LONG THE SEC = SEC = :SECTION UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER MARKER WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID OSCEOLA AVENUE NORTH, 5.00'50'40"W., 27.97 FEET; THENCE AL0NG.IHE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SHW = SHW = SEASONAL HIGH WATER ®=UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED. WATER: W~},RN!NG SIGN SIR = SET IRON ROD 1/2" LB 6113 UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER,MAFIKER LOT B OF SAID CLOVIS C. LUTZ SUBDIVISION EY THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES: 1 - S.89'59'22"W., 16207 FEET; 2 - 1TIENCE SIR = N.00'08'39"W., 13,65 FEET; 3 -THENCE S.89'S9'22"W., 77.69. FEET; THENCE ALONG THE MEAN HIGH WATER' LINE OF CLEARWATER HARBOR BY SND = SND = SET NAIL & DISC LB 6113 ~ UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER ~WAftNIN6 SIGN I THE FOLLOWING NINE COURSES, 1 = N.13'38'13"E., 76.07 FEET; 2 -THENCE N,00'18'33"W.; 28.67 FEET; 3 -THENCE N.12'16'56"E, 48,67 SR = SR = STATE ROAD. ® _ S/T = SIDEWALK 11E )T( =UNDERGROUND .TELEPHONE .MARKER T• -THENCE N.19'0T43°E. 51J5 FEET• 5 -THENCE N.24'23'07"E. 34,06 FEET 6 - THENCE N.29'15'19"E., 47.35 FEET; 7 -THENCE S/T = i FEE , 4 STY = STY = STORY ® _ UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE WARNING SIGN N.25'24'43"E., 43.69 FEET; 8 - THENCE N,14'26'13"E., 53.80 FEET; 9 -THENCE N.Ot'S4'S3"W., 40.02 FEET; THENCE ALONG;~THE SOUTHERLY _ I OF GINNING; SW - RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID GEORGIA STREET, N,88 40 45 E„ 355.38 FEET TO THE PO NT BE TBM = SW = SIDEWALK ~j =UNDERGROUND WATER MARKER I 1BM - TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ® =UNDERGROUND WATER WARNING SIGP (TYP) _ (TYP) _ TYPICAL ~ =UTILITY POLE, CONCRETE. TOGETHER WITH: VCP VCP = VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE =UTILITY POLE, METAL ' W/ _ TOGETHER WIIH,ALL (ANDS AND SUBMERGED LANDS LYING BETWEEN AND BOUNDED.BY WESTERLY EXTENSIONS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH WF = W/ _ VNTH ~ = UTILITY POLE, WOOD WF = WOOD FENCE BOUNDARY LINES AS DESCRIBED ABOVE, EXTENDED TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL IN CLEARWATER BAY AND ALL LITTORAL RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF _ W/T - ACCRETION APPURTENANT TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND. WIT = WALL TIE cv boa =VALVE, GAS , Rv~oa =VALVE; RECLAIMED WATER + 25.25. + 25.25. =POINT OF ELEVATION sv~a =VALVE, SANITARY 25,2' 25,2' =DIMENSION FROM BUILDING TO' =VALUE, WATER ' E BOUNDARY /.RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WELL- 'j STORM CCURB INLETS a ~ =CONCRETE n ~ ~~r .GJ 1_l Cam] 0 = ASPHALT )J i =CONCRETE PAVERS f'A1 BRICK ~UiY ~9 20D5 T~ = TOP OF BANK = TOE OF SLOPE or CENTER LINE OF DITCH -x- p MENT VCS = 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ,,,C1tY0FCLEARWATE --~s5~- s5~-~55' =OVERHEAD: UTILITY LINES ~ + , --G-- --W-- - -O - - --G- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND GAS LINE - -W - - -W- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND. WATER LINE ' ' --F•-- f• - - -f- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND FORCEMAIN -H?•-- -R• - - -{Z-- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND RECLAIMED WATER LINE ---12° F - 24° f - - -12" PVC.= - - ='APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER-LINE p - 24° RCP- - =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND STORM SEWER LINE C E R T I I~ I C !1 T I O N CERTIFIED TOi TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC R I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON MEETS THE MINIMUM TEC NIC ~~jj STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVE~QR~,~N•~~1~~'ER ®=BAY TREE,. 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027 FLO }1)/~• ~ , BOTTLE. BRUSH TREE ~~~%.;d~ L~ G> `i' w P, Qi =CAMPHOR. TREE ~ S~ ~ CEDAR 05/06/05 ~ ~,r,,. ~ ~ CHINABERRY TREE DATE OF SURVEY v ,,,~,f'~~.~ ~ ~ k'w' 4~~ Q` =CITRUS TREE OHN 0:, DIEHL, "PAR'O"F~ESSI',I~A~r4.QNq•51~RVEYOR 4 = CYPRESS TREE LICENSE NUMBER LS 4053 ~ ~ ~ ~,1 v STATE OF FLORIDA Q =ELM TREE 0 =EUCALYPTUS TREE , MAGNOLIA TREE Q = PROJECT: ~=MAPLE TREE OSCEOLA AVENUE Q =MULBERRY TREE. ~ =OAK TREE TYPE OF SURVEY: ~=:oTHER sPEaES BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC .SURVEY PALM TREE = PECAN TREE PREPARED FOR; PERSIMMON TREE TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC =PINE TREE _ ~ _ .SYCAMORE TREE Q= WAX MYRTLE TREE QL~~I~ ASSOCIATES INC. =.WILLOW TREE f KUf t551UNAL SUKVt 1'INU LF1 bl 7,5 2915 S.R. 590' SUITE 17 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 (727) 669-0522 CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB NO. DRAWING PATH: SHEET DATE DATE NUMBER' REVISIONS BY JOD 1" =40 GRM 02-3324 H:\JN\3324\dwg\3324topo2.dwg 1 OF 3 ' SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 2a S., RANGE 15 E., ~ ~ ; :`a PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 4 X 1 4 CONCRETE COLUMNS 321 WITH WOOD FENCE (T1P) FXC I • POOL DECK 141 , ' F7(C . CONCRETE RETAINING WALL _ s SV ~ F F FND LB 6969 ~ ~ 26J5 • i FPKD 021 CONCRETE RETAINING WALL FXC „ . i S ~ ~~yy cc J . y-- r-- rOC Ra.~- POB ( ~ ' ~ ; SCUTHERL R/W::UNE STRtwET RCEL (HREE P R ..GEORGIA ' ~ s 2sa~ P RCEL FOUR ; 2ae4 2ss~ 0 . o . 265 ` 212.46' i•~`• JD-13 EM) ~ 1r 8' , in •a.~• f~EL.TWO •'9• -d ~PARONE~ • "150'03' EL5 2 4 5. Ri~1fR QT 1 . 326 ~ 88 + FCR 5/a to ins- ~ ; '40 4 E 4 . 2 ' ~ 4 a N86 40 45 100 2 s , F ij , ~~Y o2: .3' 1 9 ` .O p OUT OF R/W FP LB D21 - . SIR o o : a • a . FC 113 324 a. FOP ~ .3' ~ - ..675 (L) 24.9'. ~ FIR 5/B" LB , is + ; ' ~ ' S D. 0.2'. FCl1 3X3 ri FOP 1 ~ BLDG. I • M 3776 a 31 ~ 5 0.3' d g, . ~ .5' OUT OF R/W e .0 / e ~ n 323 ~ a ~ FlR 5/8 N . ° ~ 285 I ' JD-12 1 .1' Q ~ PARCEL E J " ~ A CE /T OR 3515, PG 221 f ' O :r / 3 h til. , ~ SCALE:1 =30 / - 7 .5' • ~ ; R E .2 , ~ ~ cor ~ . - ~a Q - ~ .0 - - • 15 ti p ~Q^I LINE TABLE / ~ Iti Q ~ LINE BEARING DISTANCE OJ ~ ' 1.84 / JD-11 ~ L1 S00'S0'40"W 27.97 PARCE E ® 4, ' n.e~ L2 N00'08'39"W 13.65 L W ~ 1~JT 6 ' OR 3515, PG 221 ~ z } . _ ~ tas'- 1es' - - - L3 N00'18~33"W 28.67 _ ~ 315 f;! 1 a.r ~ L4 N12'16~56"E 48.67 FCA~[~ ' .X3. ~ F.- Y 18.T- ' , . L5 N19'0T43°E ; 51.75 _ E ~ Q - L6 `N24'23'07"E 34.06 - - - _ - - ~ r>; A. B,l & JENNI CATES ~ Q ~ SUBO1 SION farES for 2 . ••a ~ L7 N29'15'19"E 47,35 ' a • o ~ P. 1 G. 64 ti, ~ o 4 ~ ~ ~ L8 N25'24!43''E 43.69 ~ v o ~ ~ ~ ~ " 2.0 ~ L9 N14'26'.13"E 53.80 C•) ~ I , n 3 ' ~ e irninnr neTrc ~~.^rrn,ic^inni' iv a LO 5 i~_ J I n. C. A,C ~uv~r~~ vn~CJ JvC:vlvNlv;v r7 PARCEL E ' ~;r F1^ L>r ~ ° ~ _ _ F~i3 , L10 N01'54'63"W 40.02 R 3 57 PG 559 Y ~ I , C1 ; , , v r ~ ~ Y r7 0 5 ~f ~e Q° r7 a.:. L11 , ; S01'01'42"E - 12.50 _ 7.3' - - - - - - ~ L12 S00'04,22„E 12.90 J' v~ 1.92 ~ a Z s ~ ~ L13 S00'47'26°E 12,31 ~ Z JD-9 ~ o I _ ul rn . - • - U M 1:c o a.;. aZ PARCEL FOUR`' nor s ~ CURVE TABLE 25p, a4 ~ I PARC L FOUR ~.Q: . r CURVE RADIUS LENGTK CHORD BEgRING .:CHORD DELTA a~ ~m N. ~ I ~ o LOT 4 Xt : ; C1 45.00 15.74 _ 549'19'36"W 15.66 ' 20'02'38" _ QN : Q PARCEL E I .a' a I h 250 ' 1~( ~ ~ ~ .0' ~ 7.3', y F8C OR 3557, PG 559 `.I 271. , . e' /ry~~ ~-a I a" F ~ . •4• `V 4 t V I 2 g' 2 lB 021 L 1~~2~ f pc,a r cr ,E • ,o ~ - - 298 L W I _ - - - ~ ` ~ LtvD oa'ozi ~ JURISDICTIONAL LINE TABLE - JD- -T3.6 ~ J14 - I d. Nj o ,e ~ a F(R I1/2 lB 021 ~.z' ~ ' 2sa ~ LINE - BEARING DISTANCE g g ~C eup44 4~~ +•a F~~o iA nt JD Ll N88'39'45"E 31.58' ,O° n r.. ~ I • I ~ ti v ,Q ~ ~ ZO JD L2 N32'49'39°E 53.01' ' . N •'e.. a ~ Ul JD L3 N • '41'46"W 32.99, A PART OF SECTION 9,. TOWNSHIP 29 W I g ~ W '~e ~ JD `L4 NO6'54'19"W -21.10' PARCEL E 1.91 SOUIN, RANGE 15 EAST FIR 5/a" ~ I . ~ JD-6 < PLS 2965 w s- P i Q JD L5 N08'01'05"E 4.20' OR 1324, PG 520 b i,.'. U . I ~ P.:::. ~I cp it 47 N 0.6' ~ ~ I ' W 0.5' i ~ I PROPOSEb OSCE ! A r _ JD L6 N14'3T47"E 20.04' O O o . I 't I o ~t PARCEL dN~ ~ F' JD L7 N48'14'05"E 35.95' p ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~j JD L8 N56'52'07"E 30.96' i JZDS-95 F~~01114RX4" 3Fpi 5/6 PLS 2895 ' ~ U~ N 0 N N ~ N ~ JD L9 NOB'ST14"W , 44.96' - 750' (L) - . - - i ` ~ I f 235 SIR FCM 4"X4" 104.69' ~ t N cv ~ ~ JD L10 N1T49'40"E 44.83' ~ ~-4 Fl 1/!( O I ~ ' ~ 2237 I ~ : , ~ - I a i;', I ' ~ w O JD L11 ' N20'11'09"E 30.87,. JD L12 N21'2T38"E ' 48.24' O N 0.3' i tr O ~ ~ J 7 .i' fCR45(b - ~ ~ o, f~ ~ ~ JD l13 N03'49'03"W 23.41' i 2.88 ~ w ~ c0 ' i ~ a r r JD-3 304 N p~- 4 , F 4w O- I ,i~: CLI 4 L ~o S a Z .pO - ~3 I ~ .r , 3.01 I ~ 1566 ~_2 APART' OF SECTION 9, .TOWNSHIP 29 ~ "FOP t/2 A PORTfON OF a. GQl%ERNMENLLOr 4- r SOUTH RANGE 15 EAST a, • : E D.5' FOPt 2 ' • • '4 . I . a % .4' A' PART Of 'SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP I 29 SOURi, RANGE ?5 EAS1` ' • % ~ z I . a ' V • I e~ Q - FiR ~/z~° ' ..FlR I/2 ' ~ I ~ zsi J 30.5 291 I FXC L W 0,9~ ,p_1 7. 0.?~ ~ . • v ~p _ - - -----r ~ fCR11/2 lB 2610 R . . JD L1 ~ ~ Fc?~ F - _ +F s FlR `N89 49.92E 49:23' 3.2' 725.00 L FXC O 119 N89 5r~~4 121.94 ~ !.134 FXC VACATED 10' ALLEY/ / .e• • ~ 89. 3;~ _ ^Im LD 5408 - 302 ~ . a HC~O 546, PGS. 607-608: s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 0W6 67 4M4 FCM " a' 40 R 1 2" 8 282.41 (L) / fCM 4X4" ~ .~'~.FIF 1/2" s / OHL b ~ . 408 ~ " / n ~ PLS 3138 ,r P 13 ~ • - O / ~ . • a / 133 . . • PARC L THR E ~ I ~ FlR I f 2 PLS 3138 ~ W ~ ~ FOP i . ^ o X99/2` -t~2 'INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PFR O, R, 800 7540 , f?GS, 275-278 ` ^ W ~ ~ 1 2 ' v , FCR 1/2 PLS JI38 ~ LOT A CLOVIS C. LUTZ b Fo~OA~a / ~ 80.02 M I ~n 5 3 6' '39 30 W SUBOI Vl ON 76 ~ o •a ' ~.T g79 4,d P.B. 35, G - • ;`a ---------I--- ~ ~ ~ PARCEL FOUR ~ F 8 r7 N ~ F/T ,Z r S ~0~ 1~ D.9' S ~ I ~ ~ sIR 89 4418 W 55 03'1 t 2" FdPI t 2 o.a' w 2~6 •4 1 ~ _ . ' 23.1.'--+~ ° S ~ 2.4' D Lor B ~ ~ ° • ~ 89'4418"W 33.61' • Fo 2 , " E .'1 ~ ?E . . ~ " ~ 2ses N A PORT1 N OTS & 3 72s.oo'(L) 297x, S89 59 22 W 77.69 2979 ~ o .o ~ 0 L 2 ?6.9` 2 , r` N - SND SND J t , 1 ~ . 19 M BLOCK. 2 1 o ' ~ JONES SUBDIVISION OF nor 8 ~ ~uN o 9 2uo5 N w ~ ' " ' NICHOLS N'S ADDITION T0~ a S89 59 22 W 167.07 115 a. 3 ~ 0.5 Fpl4a ! N s CLEARWATER HARBOR P.B. h N PG.13 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SNO FCM 4"X4" • .e•• ~ PLANNIN DEVf:L PMFNT 2980 - N 0 0 ~ 19 ~ _""~._Clnr EGIEAPwaTERSVCS W N I O J~ ~ B O I Q I 1.9' ~ " I • ; ~ 2987 '~I4~ ^I ~d x9a~ - S89 59.22 W 91.6 FIR 1 2" > PL '3138 r7 _ I ~0 ~N ' ro 00 m m N1 1 ' N D:: 127 ~ - ~ a FCR 1/2 RS 31JB a. J . ' ~ - 'I torA cor 1 Lor 2 ~ ~ 23.5' d " ' W BLOCK 2 BLOCK 2 i - - 6,5' p 2,a' PROJECT: ° I • JONES SUBDIVISION OF LOT for 3 ~ r - OSCEOLA AVENUE ~a.~ NICHOLSON'S ADDITION TO ~ ! BLOCIs ecoc« 2 ~ r- CLEARWATER HARBOR P.B. 1 a PG,13 HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY V _ TYPE OF SURVEY:- 6'. I i~ BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC U _ S RVEY ~ ~ M ~ PREPARED FOR:.. FCM 3" L. S89' ~ - - ~ sIR ORTI _ ~ 589 2 " 5D. D- - s 5922 W 100.00- TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC siR ORTHERLY R W LINE siR 2s siR - ® " X89'59 22 50.00 28~ , JONES STREET 2. 0 (UNDER'sCONSTRUCTION r 2981 i~L~I ASSOCIATES INC. Os ~ ,r' r S_ , . ~ ;.2$52 • - • - - - • - 0 . x b"' PH 01-L SSIUNAL SURVL TING. LU 67 IJ b 29115'S.R. 590 SUITE 17 - - - C C ARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 2878 FOP 5/B (727) 669-0522 r LCHECKED BY: SCALE: BRAWN BY: JOB NO. DRAWING PATH: SHEET DATE DATE NUMBER REVISIONS. BY OD 1 =40' GRM 02-3324 H: \JN\3324\dwg\3324topo2.dwg 2 OF 3 ,u - ' S NITARY2 ANN~LE SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE ` 15 E., 229 RI El R 131 < J2t ~ oo 1 - F%C . S r-, ~ m N N - m m N rQ ~ 6~RU M N~ "~E T :e PI~~ELLAS COUNTY, ;FLORIDA ' 78.921 N N ~ E~• 25.7 - COLUMN CORNER 141 R ~ ' Z&92 oo~~ 1x51 20.07 F%C ~ "off 16 0.3'NX02'E P 12.55 14.1 25.1 - - - - • ~ - 224 J t 6.8 n - - --1&8~'_.r- 24.7 SV 7,75 ZB•1D 2855; ro k 28. ~ ~ 30.67._ 2615 ~ ,PKO b2i ' • 2a71 • ~ ~ ~'v2a 28.94 30.86 / 332 ~ B 7 ~ 14' 10 41219. 2712 27.51 27.fi0 + F%C :2 S 6" cdc ~ +21.2 2 D 21.12 !iNl ® 6 47 _ S ; 6, 6 ~ ' " ~ - C~ 16 JO ~ 4 + SAMfARY MANHOLE g~yCP i SANITARY MAN E 14" 9.9 Iq' t 6.25 RM EL = 27.52? Rlk'EL = 28.8D 23.5 IITARY MANI~.E ~ ' ~ 30.70 ~f J1.16 ~ + EL = 28.BD = _ 26,07 E IE = 21 90~ N IE = 21.57 +0.3 • +26 0 t5.6 12' ~ 12'0 t "-VCP SIE ~2h99 2965 ' NE'IE x 25 04;; E = 21.57 i, \ J059 IE x 25tl4 2984 ~J~, :'30.51 a !268;. S E = 23.1 " ® t 2J.1 124,6 2a2 591 26: :26:15 216t = ` 2722. I = 1 + _ TD' 125 0 23^ 26.23 ~ 26.83 299 ° ~ • b•'`1 e' ; e - Q d N Mi z6S 3.212" 14• 11. 237 2.76 6. 26k9 . ~ • • ~.I i ..2917' ' ' 29.91 ' d d o JD-1a~ND ~ 5.8 '•21.14 6.9?~ 2 9D - m ti~ .2917' • 29.99 2 64 ~ a 1 .96 30. ~ • 'dn; 319 ~ + + 0328 ~ 1 14' 0 ® 24. : • ?''23.D4' ~26. • ~ ~ 6.1 26.65'. '26:82 • J4 FC415/B IB 3776 ® L21 v 30 D8 ®30.7 e. ~ ° 12 RJO CTY 021 :2997 3P.1 30?2 O lB 021- 455 21'25 ~ 24.94 ~ 0 26.65' _ . _ - - o~ 26.2 ° a M 324 2 - 994q 29.94 'z n 675 (L) 15" 1 N 11" SHED ~ . .272 • n fpa 3%3 FOP. 0 a nn n : M 16' a^• 16• ~ ^ N : N w opnN J 0 a m i 25.0 • ' 323 3 STORY STR TURE 0 12^ 11' s.4 _ 2z5 ° 0 y a. Na ..X.. ~tf5}NISHED FLOOR 30:68 68 ® 29.9J ro rn ~ n ~ n ~ o ----F2971 -p . z 285 2"+26® 15' ~ N .D-12 0 / ® 12" D„ ' 1 STORY STRUCTURE ~ ~ 29se~ . 29.98 ' FINISHED FLOOR = 28.73- ~ ~ ~ , I 12. m. N ~ L ® r • 4.6 7.4 ~ , ~ ~ 3 L' 29, 1 29.69 ' 2B 60 ~ p ^ + 0 2 20 . ~ SHED 9.74 to ~ t ~ 11.6 12" 29.88 9i4 i 3o.1B ' SCALE;1 "=30' 29.88 294U i t Rd ^ 2.1 I6' + ! 22.6 4"5'6"l~l" ~ J.6 0 21.9 / I2 8 30 g 30.12 - 2 B 9. 0 GRATE INLET t c 0 L - 18` 50' SW IE - 25.88 -•r - 9"11' 16.8 0 0 ` ,F 5.3 11' .35 6• ' Io 2.7 e s i3' 0 ~ ~ ~ 2a5 28.4: PLAYGROUND ~ 0 ~ 2s.23 ~~7 N AREA 'GROUND I a1R a ~ ~ ~ . • AREA OONDIIIQNING .'n nn. ~ ~ n~'~'• 28 8 + ~ 22.5 12' ~ ® ~ 7.9 ,1.ea 3.1 ear UNIT:(TYP) ~ ~ ~-n Is' ® 2a2 s' cLF' 110 ~ 25.6.- 25.6 4.2 II.6• f'-'~ gal ROP ,LF 29.93. 300~D5 1D.~~2 1.41 30:8D • 12 iJ i r; ~ RCp J2.01 ' :RAMP • v y; ® •~F~ ® 11 J 0 1T 12" 3.7 5"5.5.4.4. ~ 9' " ` SHED 29 32• I3' 10.8• 7" 4'Y 6 25.1 2a ° ~ B ~ 0 o T8M NAIL IN POE 1 ON S~~HyE,~1D //~//r • VII - - / / 0 1 I!1 CLUSIE i- 0 ~Q" Q 315 a' EL = 28.6& CONC d 0 2.6 I ® 15" 130. 5. ® 8« FCI13tJ" 1 + a 15 14 4 ~ IE = 25,28 25.7. " CONC ' a~ t cd . 13"T6'6'S" 17.9. - _ I 5.4.4" 4" ~ ~ 284-13 1.53 0 It" ~ 0~ ~~j- X589 ~ N \ ~ 13 20` - ~ 20` 1 STORY STRUCTURE ~ . ' M I ~ - JD-10 + 5. - -155 4 ~ 12'' ~ n' 1a0 ~F26.2 FINISHED FLOOR = 31.95 ~ ' ® M ~ N ry M - 2.5 3.6 9 0 ~ 2S,J7 r N M +2aB 'i GJ ~ a 16' ' 1g• ~ ~ A oBl° ufOi &1 28.4 18" Q- 20 5.0 419.6 N ~ ~ N 2 < 0 2a65 28.35 Y o ~ m - 27. i oNd 5 ® 18" ~ ~ ~ , ,a . ~ - ® - N / ~ - ~ ~ M J ~ + .6 s ! N 1D + ..M M ' M} M 5 a: ry >'rn >O 157 22 +2652 27.3 ; 28.65. i~ o ~ m ,a 2918 z 29.28 _ - r1 .h * N1 _ ~ ~~C d N I 24' 25 88 0 ` N 40' 2fl0 812 6 2 . 2 2985 o 9g v 6 2 ..2 2985 m,~ ~ J f`C t 71'5'4'4' •.15'1c^ ~ ~ t t W 2,0 8" 0 ® 2a4 29.3 Z J I 29.1 ~ N 1.92 +3.1 5.9 ~ 25" 15,12 25.74 0 1 1 , . Q• ,0-9 ~ 0 6 - - u~. ~ U CJ ~ 2 25 26 b5-.- A 27.6 _ ~ - ~'a' f7 ~ ~ .9 GRATE INLET M 1NLEr O ~ +23 ~ 17.1 N • - . 5.1 1 ' i . > : 7.9 GE = 28.31. c 2x,31 2x,15 2 STORY STRUCTURE +34 ` 13 ' 4, o e SIE = 26.15 • " c ~ c + O + a.. n. I5 6 n z9.tla 15` 6' n FINISHED"FLOOR'= 31.21 ~ I-, 1.8 3.5 16' i~ 24.D8 • H 25.9 29.6h 0 ~ 227 1 STORY STRUCTURE ' 25s 2a 99' Lu 250• W ~5' 1' +23.3 ~ ~ 16.A5 '2696 . FINISHED FLOOR = 28.03 2s.D4 2899'® .M~ 29.D4 V }D. - 2 d...Ila~. 17.8 0 • ~ n P.'t@- 25.9 2895 D.1+ - 5.6 n f° ~ ~ rl n ~~pp N W 2895 S,( .h qN ~ ~ ~ ipf c~fl K' • - 0.4 P" N N. n 16 ~ MM:: M * 1'11{. : +29 < ~ 1 ' I WN N N IV 271 • +24.5. 11' ~ • m ~ , N . ~ ~ 3]-8 I - 1J 0 26 " .e°p' H i" I ~ .29.0 15'15' 1.9 6. 26.71::. ..~9 . ~ , ~ n F~ I/2 L6 021 +29.0 29 08 29a 15'15' ~ ~~3D6 M 0 29.20 ~ . I ~O CLUSTERS 21.212 10'17 ~ 0 0 ~ - 28' ~ N 2901.. - ?9A8 STAIRS. ""J"30.2•• 3G.5',~ 7..;::•3978.-'31. 2522 ~D.DJ_ FPIfD lB 6890 - 29.01 . 0 .3 • +3 296 13.017 +7.1 - ~ 9.1 - 0 - ~ - 0 021 1' - 24.4 26, , 314 ?9:04 6 30.78 2?904 ~ JO.D9 .27 30 4 ~r N 25D ~ ~ ~C 8~1~6D ++4 14 n ° RID 19 021 ! ! I " : a FCR 1/2 U3 021 4.5.6.6. 30 02 N I x 0.5 0 I a e^ n x I 4 5"6'6' 14" + q0" s e ny ro ,:2.51 _ 2916 I.F 29.03 29.03 3033• n0 M} 2951 K'i. ~ +0.8 O 8•U 21.D a.. ry. .•e M 28.71 ~ ~ 29' / 26• ~ N ° 25.6. + ~ , ~ 1 STORY STRUCTURE ® 17 2s1 ' ~ 2s.o ~F ~ 29 95 o M . ~i° ~ Mo a b 292 NN ~ M N ~ + . _ ~ 1.91 4' FINISHED FLOOR =.26.40 0Q ~ 2s.4 Q ~ m . I ` I `D"6 I N N Nl' .4 ' ' ~ N DUMPSTER n " ~ 5'4'4"T 1.1 ui',. +29.2 2a1 .29,05 v 5" I 2i 24.6 P lli I 8:7 6'8'9' 12'22 28' , N 0 7 _ • . Q ~ 3.92'. ~ + :4• 2 7 29.05 PAO~ oaM ci "1.61 r' n = ' I T . 913 EL = I ' I 29.24 ~ Z ~ 0 s•7r4~ . t de ~ 5 15 4"5.6.8. &~4. 8 111' 15 21.9 6" 6' Fell 4%f FCR 5/8 PLS 2665 2 .6 28.67GRAlE. 3.24 ~ 20.75 Nam ' ~ COI ~ M 1QN 6 2B.61GRATE INLET 750' (L) 1.6 2 I 10- I 2' 25.5 GE _ GE = 28.27 $ ANN 1P MME ° JD-4 120 24 4~4 21.9 I W IE _ I c ~ FCR 2937 13' N IE = 25.29 15" RCP I. , o „9 0 + + . M I 15" ~cPw IE = 25.98 ,0 M W N 0 3.4 3.8 I 13' 24. ~ fJ N 25.8 GRATE INLET I O 25" 2530 ~ 'flGd 26.D ~ GE = 8.26 ; 1 STORY N FGR 5, r: ~1 .9 N IE 25:79` 287 " 28,96 857'' 7- d°PP N ' .-.a, < Irp *4.0 6,q ~81 pq' +214 +245 7 28,96 857 2909 N 111 ~M' aM 28.55 ~ rv Q d 288 ® + 25.45 p • ' S 5. 5 E IE = 25 77. ~•5 STRUCTURE ' i OD-3. 6'3 FCIIg4N4 I H ~ W IE 25 76 28.83 .51 + FINS ED . ~ X99 99 .51 ~ n ° ~~I~ *n . i m J ~ 19.2 a 'a' 0 gal 4" mod 129.1 ~ ~ p (3 I 23.7 OOR = 30. I ~ gal N N 16.67 JV A ~ 'n 29.9 ~ n ~ rn m otv ~ O d -1(.° ~ e ~ 2al n j_ ~ ~ m 2 I g: 31 ~ + z9 3.01 ~ 23.4. ~ ~ 9. ~ h0 ~ FOP I 29.D7 - N ~ t J.0 ,D-2 +4.D 6.6 +N ~ . • N ~8 ~ 2a58 a FOP1/2 ''e :29.18 I 6.8 24.8 27.92 SYAIRS ~ 23.5 ~ ~ ~ . i : , a 29.3+ ~ ~ , pp * 16.8 10' f'~~ ..e r 11 T ° 9 D6 29.82 ~ r) ' M 1 ® 2ss a STRUCTURE N 4 ~ 23.5 F ~ FINISHED b 3.36 i N 13' f 30" w~ ~ :136 . F B t 14 6.1 mN FlR 1/2 N ~ ~M MI ~ - ~ . 0 4'4 JOS t n ® F%C 26A 26.59 m 4 ~ F. _ 9.32 "29.56 9.18 n- 291 , 14"10" 7 26.61 ~ ' .A-1 12" 13' 2Y -4.23.4 22' ~1 ' ~ 25.93 ® N a . m o. 29.1 30 07 3D.3 ¢ ' h,r. N a•. 923 S NITARY ANHOL IO'6" 6" 6' 12'24'14' 8•I ~ 1.41 31.41 0. JD Li ® / 23.05 FCN4>14 ' ' ~ 2923 9 .38 1.39 I - 4.4 5.17 7 23.D4 311 ~ t 6 2627 2 . 184029/8 30,63 30.91' 1.41 31.41. ' 2 29.66. ' 31 11 3131 v SL 5 R M ~Ix 1.78 M 30.91 ^3 . ~ B . EFL bY32610~'P ' ® ~ 0 3076 __J__ B 1 ' 'n S IE =26 47 . n;::= 725.00'(L) 419 / ' FXC 0 6.8 23' 26.2 FXC t.e 00 0' VCP v.98 27.J0 134 s M S M ' g .13.0 m ~ 0.89 15 26' x~ / 24.20 JD2 25.9 a ~ 28,18 F~SAID 5408 ~ +122: ~ , a - - . 2 ~j F0~14><4 ~ ors' N .09 ~ 30:70 In . J023 i , 6 13" w ry ~ M n nm 30 70 ___a ~ z4- • 282.41'(L) / 2437 25.9 5 5 9 / OHL b ro J062 064 22.98 ~ ~Gl' 20' •.3om JDSB JD@8 ~ 3062 0.6 -16.93 0,43 "1 n _3091 3139 > ~ / •49 27 ~ ~ 8 25. 25. SANI RY MANHOLE Ate,, 0 0 306J 1'6.4 ~ ® 16" 9•~ 6.2 8 V RIM {~2~,~3~138 'w'N • `n > 3063' 3651 ~ 30.40 - 3102 31 J5 o wl ~ GRATE INLET R h M'' + 18• ~ / N I ='2211 j 5.1 ' ® 25.807 a, SIE = 22.89 JO 44 12° ' 12e VC GE!= 30.26 S IE = 2634 3127 ~ •Na ' ~ +2 •q 132 ro ~ = 23.05 G ATE IN T ' . ~ ~ LE I 15 6 F~ I t f 2 2 11 _ •o- FIN 1/2 1 = 23.03 G = 30:26 O M WIE=28.35 ' ~ 6®~~~a~~~-~, 2D.23 ' - i` 13, + 6 6 910 6' E E 27.91 3D. 3 I ~ 5 ,.,215 26 I „ ~ S 6 i A S E= 27:88 0 30.3 ~ '3152 3t3e ~ y ~ ~ 1.6 2.D3 .,i . ' J133 + n4 56 ~ ? ryq. 6°p hh ,.~,'ES~ 5,81 ~ o r~ I V 51 N ~ iu 1.&1 3206 7.5 +14,D SANITARY MANHOLE C'A n ~ 3956 q - - ~ - -1J.9 -ftlM'EC= 2562_' 'm ' m~` 999 M 5~ 4.7 + I4' 42° NE IE _ .23.03 ~ h 'FOP 5/8 i ~ , ~ ^ - ~ i!1 Ems' In ° 5.D ~ 14.52 5 IE _ .22.85 ' FOP I 1 2 12' 11' 9 ~ r~ ry N 1^,1 M• ' 3135 ~ ~ ~ ®2r , ~ 0 ® SWIE = 23.54 / 288 N . M. NW IE = 2~>'~9 J~ + •n 128 i ~ .16' ~ ..,.a. 10' +7.0 121 ® a`7./ FOP 1;1,® JF:J 10'13' 17.06 /BB ~ m ~ tWj i J13 ~ ' 'Y. ' , .,~a , U1y h h., M Ml.j ~ 725.00' L 0 2 79 ~ • ~ , 30. ~ i ~ ~N" 281 5.45 - t 31.16 31.16 18 F;', .F 10.516.34 . 'n•. ,d: • p 9• 19' 1 STORY $ ~ , ~ 136 1D" 27" 14" u5 ~ ; . ~ 136 2209 15.96 q,4 q,{ N N 16.66 26.72 STRUCTURE ~ ~ +28.2 I 30.5 a J1.21 J1.21 ~ ' e.ps 2555 4 5 ~'•y INISHED FLOOR . gas N 2960 2216 ,r•y S a. = 2 .1 ~ t L3T 1.37 ~ SANITARY MANHOLE ' N N N ~ I 30.84 J0:64+ RIM EL = 25.78 , ,o ~ o I 3127 . 31.27 I .+u N IE 22.98 ~ ry R m. N -1. 5 IE = 22.97 N N WO D 2a2 I , W IE = 24.02 ' SH 0 7 2987 L3f 13t 1 STORY STRUCTURE a, - -FINISHED-FL-OOR-= 31:80 - = - 25.4J 25.1 ~ 4 I - 25.3 r, JOB1 31.21 2a9- 081 31.21 1.31 Y` ~ I ~1.3} I M~ N> f . n e _ (.~4~ +2].0 _ " 3111 29.2 30.66 3121 I ~ pEA~Nit~G 3 OEUE OPMEtv~TSVCS 21.6 12' 3'3"5"6' 307 " 1' 25.26 '°25 127 J0.5 J 66 253 I' FCA I/2 PlS 3138 4 29.4 0 22 .,31,22:: s 2v 25.7 f t 30,74 'Jk Y s1>~ ` Ju.i., • a 126.7 14' I , gal 19.2 ~•6 '.GATE INLET 4 ' 18' ® I G = -30:29 12" • - )Y d STORM MANHOLE 14• ' N IE =:27;79 p4'C ~ ' 174• v - ° i 0 RIM EL = 26.16 I 5 IE 27.79 p~C ~ ' .174 • e - ~ . 31.77. 3.72 CATCH BASIN o ~ ~o N IE = 19.34 ~ 29 2 N ~ E IE = 11.46 (66" RCP) ~ I 30.94 29 29.2 •29.0 Y 29.3. 31.75 ~2B.3_ , 0 ~ 2a4 3is ~ PROJECT: 30.94 29. .1 21.8 - 21J - - - - 5 RIM;;EL = 25;4Q N ~ ry o i SIE = 19:49 N E IE = 9.88 (42" RCP) 24' 14' 19. ~ ,d _ 36.1 3078 27.• 3U.16 27. IE = 27.69 3,6 ~ OSCEOLA AVENUE sr m:.~ N W IE - 8.52 Al ® JOJ ;¢2 n ~ 117.0 14" 29.5 J0.70 21 8,9 ~ a I 30.80 21 N21 • 8,9 21227,4 4 27.5 = +2~8 +28.1 8` ~ • . a . 6^ 0 I 65 J0:66 M 2' _ 25.33 30.`88 `g g 29. 30.80 m 29 27z, .3 " -~18.r- - - - ~~6 ~ --•-I~2a5 313 h ' • TYPE OF SURVEY: ti - 2531 125.50; ~1 : ,70,51 ~ uoi ~ .STORM MANHOLE pA, w 9.U ~ _ ~ ~ ~ 31.1 ~ ~ M Q 4-. , BOUNDARY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY RIM El = 25.D3 ~ 25.54 29.3 019... ~ ° 9.0 29.1- L . OH ® N ~~e PREPARED FOR: E IE = 8.60 21.86 509 g o SIE=19.21 2982 30.52 2983 M W IE = 8.79 24.55 " 66' RCP 24.75 {21 CONFLICT 80X. W~ g07 GU~~ M N ELECTRICAL EpUIPMENT SDRM MANHOI~ 6G~` RGP - TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT. COMPANY, LLC STORM, „AN QLE RIM;EL =.29.08 2981 RIM EL = 126,34 SIE = 24.13 +2984 2981 SANITARY MANHOLE RIM EE = 3D 23 +2984 RIM EL ~ 3015530.52 E IE = 11.94 ` ~ ~G/ 31 ~i+ ~ , ~ ~N E IE,= 23.30 +2758 +2644 '2862 W IE = 24.0$ +292J a 25.33 +25.69 SW IE = 23.27 CP F14LED!W~ tliRi S p W IE = 11,88 0 T RECLAIMED WATER. Q ~ ~ 30.87 31,Oy~ ~ s A ARG`}XANHbC~ - _ METER INSIDE B~VCP„_ 2652' ® ~ ASSOCIATES 1NC. - - _ ECR lD 6113 2761 , RIM EL ~ 25.48 Or 26,18 3 iJ 2616 ZS4 f ~ 2 02632 ~ 5.... -4`••,.;:140 " N IE = 2241 A - nb 3o-95 FIG.= ~7 SR' . !"r a, x4": . . y : 1:21' ~ .19.1. . - 30. 'r~,. ~ _ . 30.01 nautteev u~DUro r- 3D 99 +/"r r~pnc~ecinninr ciiAVCVrnr~ i a a~ a ~ 24.62 ~j( d ' S 7E a 22 ~6- r 30.26 ~runinni -11- ' / IN 1111V1 L-dd,IN1Y/"16 %.7V1\VIL I11V%.7 6.N V I./V 111,14 31, 14: ° FILLED:-WITH WATER;: 2~6 7,43 12" PVC 9• jQi4 3026 2678 r~ UNABLE'TO MEASUi' 29.97 •;30,17 30A0' 30.93 pppp 30,62 NE IE -727.04 31.28 30.81 4o' 3993 NE IE 7ss 2 3~.08 X0,65 ,c915 S R 590 SUITE 17 ao, CATCH BASIN FOP S7N ° PIPE SIZES v eQ 27.64 i 3079 33.31 ry CATCH BASIN a 30 RIM EL = 25.79 RIM EL = 25.68 3036 S iE = 27.09 0 31.06 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 N IE = 20,55 12" R"p w NE IE = 23.31 E IE = 21.59 SE IE - 23.38 (727) 669-0522 SIE=20.54 WIE=23.13 lit ry 8 i CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB NO. DRAWING PATH: SHEET N DATE is DATE NUMBER REVISIONS BY JOD 1" =40' GRM 02-3324 h1:\JN\3324\dwg\3324topo2.dwg 3 OF 3 b . i ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ i s - - d i c I - _ _ r _ _ „ , - _ 0 ~ ~ - ~ : J b ~ Yom' Yb~pYY1 YYYwY~~ , : ~ 00 _ ' f"~ ~ ~ I' \ i~, I ~ ~ J I i i I / ~ / Y ~ ° DECK w ~ DECK ECK DECK o DECK DECK FIRE - ~ i 1 I I I - -i ~ , ~ COMMAND ~ ~ / ` ~J ` I • I 0 w~ ~ I i i ~ I ~ LLa I f O i i ~I, • I I N H ti I y I , , I ~ ~ I UP ~N ~ 4 ~ ~ U I ~ ~ i i I ? 1 I I ~ i~ I ~ I UP UP I T o I ~ ~ ~ li ~ - I r.r-. ~ ~ t~ ~ _ ~ i I I ~ I I 1 ~ - ~ i I I I', ~ I ' I ~ i i ~ TR E ~ECTRICAL I o I, a I ' i I U j I o _ d I I p I I DECK I ~ I I', ~ DECK EC DECK I DECK - - - - - - - - - - - - I h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ` 1 XXX - ~ I i. ~ 0 \ • ~ I HIR I 00 I , `i i ~ TO BEACH DN I ~ ~ - - - - - ~ - - - I ~ ~ ~ HIR T 00 ~I V r Q ~ I ~ - - I ~ 1 • I I ~ I ~ ' 't I I • ~ O ~ RAMP ~ I ~ ~ i . . ® ~ ~ 1 1 ' N. y 1 ~ :7 V Z I V ' I _ ~ ' ~ l a Y H ~ w ~ Z ~ ~ I O 1 ' ~ ' 1 3 .'m•• y Q Q ILL ~ I. ~ ~ u r i ~ ~ T -------0----------- _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ RAMP i I ~ i o • i I .,DECK i • i =---=t==-------- I , ~ I ~ ~ • ~a~ ~vA~ - ~ ~ W • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O TO BEACH qN'~.'• ~ I ~ / I I I I ~ ~r ~ ~\'r~ ~ I UP I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ELEC. ~ ~ _ / \ ~ ~ 1 ~OUNTAM ~ p~ DECK p. DECK ~ I i TR ~ DECK EC DECK ~ I I ( I I I I DECK I ` ~ 'A i ~ ~ i ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ o / I 1 I I ~ I ~ ' TR ELECTRI AL I I i h i i i ~ ~ - I W ~ k• D o ? l ~i ~ ~ ~ I J k~ I O ~ I ~ I UP DN ~ ~ U 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ i / I ~ ~ i ~I_ . O • 1 w ~ ~ I ~ ~ / ~ I DECK ~ Qd FIRE , DECK ~o COMMAND DECK EC ~N 1 I~ DECK U i ~ I ~ ~ , l ~ 0~ ~ ~ DECK DECK 1 .aw I i Y ~ Y. IAR' I ~ W ~ ~ - I ~ Q it i ~ I Q ~I ~.u/ J ' Jc ~ I I, _ . _ I i I i 1 viz. G mail l i I o LL_ I I 1 o tUU ~ 111111 IV y W . 1 ~ WD w~ m w z of i~ ~ C.0 1 I I W I I I~~ (ti ~ I I . o -------------1 i V t r I I Q I I I ~ I UP P I ?T I 1 I I I ! i 1 O I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l I I I t dA r + I ! l I ~ I I I i 1,4 i 1 ' FF1 i ii mom I lip ! i i / 1. ---JONES STREET ~ ~ ~ ~ j i . MF~W IGIIER SS. 300-410 OSCEOr,A AVENUE ADDRE /N SECTION: 9, TO W~VSHIP 29~ SOUTH, RANGE: ~15 EAST 302-308 •OSCEOLA AVENUE ~ ,a ~0'4STAC ~ ~ wA~w ~ 301 OSCEOLA AVENUE „ AY N.,,~,i r(oj i 400 8c 410 JONES ST1~ ET e~ e~ , .or 1ao CLEARWATER FLORIDA. ~ , ~ n,rr , ~ n:,~,rs , ie~ r~r ~ ~ue9~+fe • at ~ ei.21 SIR ~~b~ rw ~ LB e~7 S00'Jeb011: a00'(y p~ , . ~a' ~ r,rr Q ~ ~ ~ S ~ r, ' ~ ~ .r~ . ~ o • asp • . $ ~ 20 40 ~ 80 N,00'06 2 J85M' ~ ~s ~ 1"40` ,tae, e 1 +r SrR 5 b ~ • s J ~~1~ . 2- E o ce ~ii cer y 5S 8 P ~ o ~Q urrcmES cEGENo i • , 1 Q A . ~1~vr 6E' e sw'/ i/+ ~ ,~rl rRr~ •M -wu~R ~cv~ i A PORTION 5 1 SECiSN~ g 0 0 0 slr r /4 ~ 1/+ 4 ~ , ~V ~ iRaE -raa~ron~ Box i 9 ~ ~ + • o e ~ ~ , , t~ •4 -cam ear S ~ 0 9~ , $ ~ -nQOPrr'u TREE -s~rnrwr ~uurro~ • 4 ~ 0 O~y 9 ~ 10. . e• ~ a • -aw rR~ -w,, ear 3 ® P' ~ i } 3u ~ , io• ~ , s 6 ~ - PocE i i 91E -cmNr PotE rRrE . 5 -M~NCAOVE e ~ ~ . re• Q ~ iG ® WA1flP PIPFS ,~r o ~ ~ - ~ 1s rs 10 Q -ooNSER rREE : 3 ~ Nor 9KYrlDED 2V nds suR~v i' xP o• •-~1,owERnuo rR~ -FtRE ?r?~RUUr ~ -ne~ro ear. . y >te • , ~ -otalPEfRUrr mEE ~ ~ -eruw -rx~DNwr ear ~ a ~ ~ a k u~' ~ oS • t.2~ P Ir . i~ . ~ ~ 0 b , ~ • ~ o. S ie. 21 • 6 ?o , u5 Q N.oo~oe'12'w., 7dOJ~ ~ o• p Nor rrexrmEO su 7doo o aa+ 6 n+s suRVEr (U io , ~ 1e.J~ ~ ~ a 61 0 e,r r,101VC1iE1E + , ' ca 0 ~ ~ ~ CURVE TABIE ~ Nat ~ • " R~dUS . ~ . 10.. ' 6 CSW ~ w 20'1914 O • / O I' ~1~ id9e' .1e " ~aRe~. si ~ 1G~0 rP J RP, J ~ ~ ° 1~so w! ~ ~ ~ootil~a7~ 1489 ~ ~ W8 ® saunl axree~(~ aaRO eE~rNo ~~~+a7K ® NGT 910L11aEe MV ~p • A PORRON ~E rMS'SURVEY P1S zeds ~ ~j'~ ~ i ~ N89'S8'02"W. 910QK ? i 2 ~ m 49.55 III) • ^I' ~ , COV. N ,.r l i , n I' 5) ~ i 6 i ` ' a 45 i i g ~ ~ ');4~ r _ ~ , ~ r;;. - ~ ~ ~ - i - - - - - o ~ =-e*-- s' a 07, + ~ • rMl7 u i ' 6 0 ~ 109 CbMG w 6 RERNINN POND 0 a q ~ 7 w w 1 " a ~ ~ tq b a~' + cor 4 73 cor a . ~ ~ K ~ ~ ' ' cor 7 fll JXJ s+• f ~6 . w ' ~ ~ / D' 1 • w ~ X x M lva'1 3 ~ ~wicr oRn~E ~ Pam tors s ~ • , • ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a !3 9 JONa OF ~ ; `S SRAM a~11N P.& 1 61 d ~ k I WW ' r S101PM ? ~ 7 'i•~ 1 11 w 'i 191fi11E0 AtlEY PE1P ' • O 1 w " ..~R,eoox 7270 PCS 17Ji-}7J2 i ..;e t~' 6 ~ . ~ 2 I k 'DONE. CA ae ' ,11 . ~ ~ I 0 f1R i • ~ ~ ~ ~ j 1n •'7 I V r J I .D101rN ~ ~p ~,~y pp~ C,~~ . I1 q~ R 70 ADS i7Ji-17Js l!q _ ~ 4 ~ w w I ae' • ~ J ~ • cor s ~ , . 1 ~ e• o~ ~ cor r core core i 4a ~ I w~ ~ . ~ I , ? • ~ oRNN ~ ~ A PORIIGW OF Og5 'S. ' ~ ~ ~ e OOYEIMafOVl,idi' 4 ~ ASPiMLf AIRKINO i' !3 I fir, • . ` I o~ a L0~'wl~ly~~O,N,~_J_LIP I• ~ • ~ ~ ~ aus1ER ~}acr oRn+c ! , /3 R M.:• ~•b ~ . ~ r.. a~. I >•o ~ 1 t~ ~ Jl2, a ~ i t o ! 08 rr • ~ * . NE CORNER ~ d. ~i . ~ ~ 'l~~ :'10#OIII~A7N.' - . o 0 . - - - r - - - - - _ - - sou>H eJaJ7' K iar Nwwm more . SOUfH' d1a2J N PoRT NARRlSON AVENUE i ~ ~ , _ H Villa ,i , r . ~ arrison ge ~~~43 a~~~ ~J ~ Tree Inventory . APR ~ 205 Page 1 of 2 to-nt,,~„r , • ~ ~ ~ ^ - ~ p, ORIGINAL _ ~ r, l i SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 15 E., PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA t 30 15 0 30 SCALE:1 "=30' M ~4~ p ~".J;:. ~ `,'}5:,. s~:aij~:'~ii~i(~it`71n,"caj'Ia~t7%y+i~;` ;~.ii'rs,:, ~ V ~V 41r~~ ;Sr:j=.t{i r .'Y"';';' , ,Gi~ ~t?,'.,nr,%" A'S;; hc. 'js:'ti+;;::::~*:~:+'i~?,.',rk',.t n!t;;:°!..: M. ~ !'r.:;r;i7:i` 1t/; j~:1Y:'~..; a .i. r^~~,.: "V y:.i:. f: .::1'r`:r' r'.t, :?,'i'..4't^{Ci'j :',rt';"S'•:1!:j %;?,t'li^;'ii:•`„~;.1 ~ r 'f ,{l;~r't;; ~t",u„^~,•r '~.iF; ~,~".p.. '1,G!(~i,`'4.•r41"•,iii4lrl".,,?.,,,Wl.;;';,:~,~r: . ~ FrJ,Sti'~'i';f>ki.'•,pl•?; rr.,,i°y: v>%::.n^: ma;?S`rt:c,'~:i:{i' :%I';M1~~j . ~f4 yyw;,,„,,; (~'~~.tier.i..;,:;.;i.•t>rc•,ochx`~.t'~3;: '~:!G:1~:(!:'':~ 015• - , • , ; / _ ~ ,r,,. r.,,,.,,. Ir - V~ ,r ? ~ r tr ~ 'n:; ' ~ ~ ~ J 1.:... 0 .Sti, 1G N X11 ~D 6 H ~ ~ ~ ±•;::.:;..•,1."t,::".•",~;: / / ~r qtr c- ~ 1r ~ o ~ ~ o / / ? ~ I 6 ? a' ~o ~ i ,::{I , / aua>Ea C ~ 1~ ~ , 4' IJ' •.c pd ~ P j~~,,•„~,~;:.~;<; ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ll .~.~~:~~Ir 'I°:`i e:::.... rb{•,r;~f?.tk~:r.A~; ,w r;f/j. ~~~i,4;yr; :er1%:?fG:j; iia.i;i;~: I y1. ~ / 'r a •(w;i„r. .F.:'';l', : ..lit ~ J1 Q .3: }i'P:;{.y%: ~,.vG.}si51'~rsyi':;~~i /rte ~ ..1A,,r"': ,A,X.">a:;~j:l. 1 1 ~ 0)~~<~si~i~yli'4 T ir' n• )r~)~:::,i:J , __,L___ ' -f M 6' rr, st is • ~ ~ ~ ~ k • / Ir °cl a <a ~ ' ~ L.:.. i ~~A' Jr:1`~~:rli'~:f'e.' ,::,~.,.jtl; ~:,;:~,1,,,; ~y ;i,~,::;::.;: 14 <:cu~`r 1 I 1 ~,A:~~,~.~u ~;°f`"aye 0 • ~ ® ~11 r o r t 1,:: M `r;r;~` ii+;~,; ?~'r:.i . ~T f~i:1~h~~:F . A ~ ;y4ji ,,J,y;~'r'. TREE LEGEND i s• • BAY 1AEE 80111E BRUSH 1REE Qi ¦ CA6PHOA iREE NAY ~;r:.:j yr~G{;~i~q:l. ~ • (1iDAR Qo • CHNABERRY TREE i ~ ~5 t s' :)fit: ...,:'fir;. _ }lam`. ~ 'r:, .:.y. 0.011RU51REE Q ¦ CYPRESS 1AEE JtF: i ~ o-:.Fyfllii '!iv'j Q • EUI TREE jai}tl,~~;; ~)~i EUCAI.IPTUS TREE c• r s;,, • MAGIIOUA TREE • MAPIE TREE I. r `r;,`21~1. Ar;~~.r ~ J 1 r 1 3 F, :J•~` w. 4'.. Q • MIN,BERRY TREE ':J:J': ,,.i;v~%~<::a T•:::jil`j~ri>~y~'Ir; In:.i';}hr:,;~tj'i!if:~! 'i' ...:Ij?::~rl~:. ;4;u 1,~:.::.3vJ.r-,..,Cl ~;r~,li?''ir'?~':~y~i`~r;.. ,i 9M a.1,:;:: riJ(:j"`Si'r ~~:",..I,,;;y^}~'y %~fiir...;:.fi•~p:):: (rFil?Il tj i ..1.1 ~.i:A, ::alii{',..:if`t^S'~;'.L,...ryli.;t:r:!>: j<l., i:~.,. ;loll p"'' ;;?y+ 'r,.a 911 •7" ? a~ ~ c rl'.,.,, J•"`. sJJ:,`':,. OAK 1AEE • OTHER SPEdES . t.4~g2f`y. 1'ry[,y;f`.',i ih. !'vy~.'.: Q;n` U^•~`,?m, r. ,..;!;.r.: b,j:,idt 1J,'.ip~ti ~14 f I t t ,li;;::„yFs•'iP:?: u.. ;,ir,cr~','+~J.;~"~e.'I; ;::~ir .G ^t;'; rvjj" "~~sl;% d Gi)J,LI. ,•xjT;: ^ .~~~,!i1gi<iYi: ~}Cn~1'.':f.!!:r i9i'r~1'% "y$iiP,i ?I:;,.Sr:,:,llj'+Gur:•wi•~1'7.' J.,.(r.S~~~l=. ~.,ii'.titw:..:1~^rr•:'~, ¦ PAUL TREE ''`~~!~':~,,^';:Q,1{!i'i;Q:+r%~~° .r,,yy:+^~.i;;e;~''i'~?:'ii;'rt'3,~.'.,•v{;::?:;:i~<~5~•:;';z;';;7;'i•,r<I. ..J ,fsp ~ :k;7:r,;c tJ;.:,t:.; t;JF~'. :cf 'un ~ ¦ PECAN 1REE PERSMANLW TREE r{y a I ~r r S i ~ • PINE 1REE I :x,;A. SYCAMORE 1REE Q • MAX M1TitUi TREE I ~ • MALOM TREE i I I i ' ~ O~I~~~`~~~~~~L .T garrison v iiiagu rw~ Tree Inventory Page 2 of 2 ~ zaL:r~ 11 APR 2 8 2005 DATE NUMBER REVISIONS BY v ~