Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2006-05029
Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562.4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUI RED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 03/28/2006) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Park Isle Condominium Development, LLC, APPLICANT NAME: a Florida limited liability company MAILING ADDRESS: 100 Atlanta Technology Center, Suite 200, 1575 Northside drive, NW, PHONE NUMBER: Atlanta, FA 30318 CELL NUMBER: (404)367-6025 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Same as Applicant List ALL owners on the deed Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire AGENT NAME: Johnson, `Pope,..Bokor, Ruppel.& Burns, LLP MAILING ADDRESS: P. O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-462-0365 CELL NUMBER EMAILADDRESS: A tim7?7p irm•com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Park Isle Condominiums PROJECT VALUATION: STREET ADDRESS 100 and 101 S. Park Place Boulevard PARCEL NUMBER(S): 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 and 17/29/16/85546/000/ PARCEL SIZE (acres): 26.99 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" attached. PROPOSED USE(S): 390 multi-family units, existing DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Exhibit "B" attached. Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) PLANNING DE d O O (V? v1 Q Page 1 of7 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A X EVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The•design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation on adjacent properties. RECEIVED tII?' n 2 ?nn? J1.d VVJ PLAWNG-DEFARTME1 CITY OF CLEARWATE Page 2 of 7 0 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Flexibility Criteria) ? Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific Use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stomwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ORIGINAL ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. RECEIVED ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; A G 0 3 2006 ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; PLANNING DEPART ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; CITY OF CLEARW; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): _ Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor X elevations shall be provided. t CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; Page 3 of 7 G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas _ and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stomtwater management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface. ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11 ? FOR DEV ELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: PROPOSED One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ORIGINAL Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; RECEIVED All open space areas; AU G 9 Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; AUG O 3 2006 Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); PLANNING DEPARTI _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); CITY OF CLEARWA _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Page 4 of 7 H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; _ All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8 Y3 X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. RECEIVED AUG 0 3 200-0 Page 5 of7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and postdevelopment levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 4OCAUTN - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. ? Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. t, 3 Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required.'' 0 2006 CAU ION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW PLANNING D •PARTI CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE CITY OF CL ARW/ RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. l , \, Sig ature of prope owner or representative Timothy A. J hnson, Jr., Esquire STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 24th day of I Sav A.D. 20_QL__ to me and/or by Timothy A .= Johnson . Jr - who is personally known tm ary p lic, y com fission expires: NT h,,L4., Jayne tz. -.,>ear5 Commission # DD449633 Page 6 of 7 Expires September 2, 2009 '??,ri OoMetl Troy fain • insurance, Inc, @00.315.7019 0 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed -PRINT full names: Park Isle Condominium Development, LLC, a Florida limited liability Company 10 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 100 and 101 S. Park Place Boulevard 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible development approval 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is Var 'd .TrrTct Condominium Development, LLC, Bv: Park Isle Condominium Investors LLC,. Property Owner its sole Mere ;7alty By: JLC SII, LLC, Mgin Membe Property Owner By : STATE OF GEORGIA ) COUNTY OF FULTON ) , Manager Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 3rd day of May 2006 Lee Walker, Manager of JLC* , personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. *Suncoast Realty II, LLC, managing member of Park Isle Condominium Investors, LLC, sole member of Park Isle Condominium Development, LLC ? ((? ```????i11111A11?1//7777j/, Notary Public Sig atu Notary Seal/ p ,... M)' My Commission Expires: 6 ?( 4 os%y ORIGINAL 2 RECEIVED :a 4N1C ,;'o «QPAUG 0 3 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 7of7 . CITY OF CLEARWATER EXHIBIT "A" 1 • • LOT 2 A tract of land being all of Lot 2, according to the plat of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLAdE -as:,recorded in Plat Book 109, pages 10 through 11, of the public records of Pinellas. County; Florida, and lying within the Northwest % of Section 17, Township 29 South, 1366gei16 East, Pinellas County Florida, being more particularly described as follows:- t t, znfy, BE'[ atlhe Northeast comer of said Lot 2; thence along the North boundary Gnes of saii3fiot'2;the following nine (9) courses: (1) thence South 89°40'39' West, for 195.18 feet;%?2)fhence North. 59639'49' West, for 67.80 feet-, (3) thence North 81'37'55' West, fOt 52:11 feet; (4) thence South 72'25'38' West, for 41.99 feet; (5) thence North 75,`34`35' West, for 41.82 feet; (6) thence South 83'04'43' West; for 47.02 feet; (7) Aher)ce South 40°38'34' West; for 41.06 feet; (8) thence South 02°04'59" West, for 4.23 _. '; (9) thence South 89'40'39' West, for 165.65 feet to the point of intersection with a --non-tangent curve concave to the West, said point also being the point of intersection with the Easterly right-of-way line of Park Place Boulevard, as recorded in aforesaid plat; thence Southerly along said right-of-way line and the arc of said curve with a radial bearing of North 75°11'54' West, and having a radius of 365.00 feet, a central angle of 15'19'54', an arc length of 97.67 feet and a chord bearing South 22'28'03' West, for 97.67 feet to the point of tangency; thence South 30'08'00' West, along said right-of- way line, a distance of 457.64 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the West, having a radius of, 2000.00 feet and a central angle Of 00'23'52'; thence Southerly along the arc.of said curve a distance of 13.89 feet to a point; thence South 57°38'27' East, departing. said right-of-way line, a distance of 195.80 feet to a point; thence South 32'21'33' West, a distance -of 60.00 feet to a point; thence South 30'13'69' East, a distance of 252.93' feet to, a point; thence North 30'01'50' East, a distance of 211.83 feet to a point; thence South 59'58'10' East, a distance of 190.00 feet to a point; thence North 30'01'50 East, a distance of 278.85 feet to a point; thence South 85'1921' East, a distance of 232.23 feet to .a point; thence North 00'19'21' West, along the. East line of said Lot 2 and the West right-of-way line:of Hampton Road (C.R.144) a distance of 564.52 feet to said Northeast comer and the POINT OF BEGINNING. LOT 3 A tract of land being all of Lot 3, according to the'plat of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, as'recorded in Plat Book 109, pages 10 through 11, of the public records of Pinellas_Couijty../Florida, and lying within the Northwest % of Section 17, Township 29 South, Range ,,6,_East, Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:,:''? '- BEGIN at h6, Southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence along the Westerly right-of-way line of PakPface Boulevard and the East line of said Lot 3, North 30'08'00' East, a distance of.-gfli:5Tfeet to the beginning of a curve. concave to the West having a radius of 285.00 fe4 a6d.,a central angle of 58'53'31'; thence Northerly, along the arc of said curve, a distonce of 292.94 feet to the point of tangency; thence North 28'45'31' West, a distance of 240.13 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the East having a radius ofF90.00 feet and a central angle of 32'15'06'; thence Northerly, along the arc of said Cufve, a distance of 388.40 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the West, having a radius of 610.00 feet and a central angle.of 3'25'46'; thence Northerly, along the arc of said curve, a distance. of 36.51 feet to the point of tangency; thence North 00°03'49' East, a distance of 190.21 feet to a point; thence North 44*56'11*.West, a distance of 35.36 feet to a point; thence:: North 89°56'1.1' West, along the: North line of said Lot 3 and the South right-of-.way line of :Drew Street (C.R.108). a distance of 357.62 feet to the Northwest comer of said L6t.3; thence South 00'22'28' West, departing said South right-of-way line and along the West line of said Lot 3, a distance of 1287.33 feet to a point; thence along the South boundary lines of said Lot 3, the following five (5) courses: (1) thence North 89'5449' East for 50.00 feet; (2).thence South 45'05'11' East for 208.00 feet; (3) thence North 00'05'11' West for 120.15 feet; (4) thence North ORIGINAL 89'54'49' East for 97.31 feet; (5) thence South 59'52'00' East for 153.00 feet to said RECEIVED Southeast comer and the POINT OF BEGINNING. AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 9 EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC 100 and 101 S. Park Place Boulevard ORIGINAL RECEIVED t! )' 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The subject property consists of 26.99 acres developed with 390 multi-family units, and is currently zoned, "C", "O" and "P" with accompanying land use designations of "R/O/G", "R/O/R" and "P". The parcel is part of the Park Place DRI and is designated on Map H of the DRI for 390 multi-family residential units via a land use conversion. The residential units on the property were constructed in 1998, prior to the adoption of the Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code"), but in compliance with the approved DRI development order and then existing zoning and land use designations. The adoption of the Code and designation of "C" and "O" zoning districts which do not allow multi-family residential use made the existing improvements a legal non-conforming use. After build out of the project, Code text amendments increased the parking requirements from 1.5 spaces per unit to 2 spaces per unit. Accordingly, the applicant requests termination of status as a non-conformity in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code to allow: (i) 390 multi-family residential units as a permitted use; (ii) a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit (780 spaces) are required by Code; (iii) two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted) and with an area of 45 sq. ft. (where a maximum of 24 sq. ft. is permitted by Code); and (iv) a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. with a height of 6 feet and an area of 45 square feet. The Planning staff has indicated it will be supportive of the termination of status as a non-conformity, as an alternative to the applicants' request for rezoning and land use plan amendment, to make the existing use conform to Code. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 0 0 The 390-unit project has been in existence at this location since 1998 and is in harmony with the surrounding properties. The Park Place DRI is a mixed use project, including residential, commercial, office and industrial components. The compatibility of this site with other parcels in the DRI was confirmed at the time of development order approval. The existing density is compatible with the existing land use designations on the Property, which allow a maximum density of 394 units (see Exhibit "C" attached). The existing 693 parking spaces adequately serve the project. At the time of construction, the Code required 1.5 spaces per unit and the project had excess parking with 1.77 spaces per unit. The City has increased residential parking requirements, making the existing parking non-conforming. There is available parking in front of the unit garages which residents actually use for parking but is permitted to be included in the total parking area per Code requirements. The project is build out and there is no additional construction proposed, nor an area in which to locate additional parking. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. There is no new development proposed. The proposed termination of non- conforming status will allow the existing development to be reconstructed in the event of loss or damage exceeding 50 percent of its value. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The termination of non-conforming status will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The attractive, well landscaped entrance signs are attached to an entrance feature (gated wall) located over 50' from the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard and have no impact on motorists' visibility. The sign located within the Park Place Boulevard median has been at that location since 1998 and does not impact motorists' visibility. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The applicant is not seeking any additional density or intensity to what is currently in existence on the site, so this will not negatively impact traffic. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ORIGINAL RECEIVED t,yS 0 3 2006 2 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEAPWATER The City determined, through approval of the DRI development order, that multi- family residential use at this location is consistent with the character of this mixed use DRI. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The design of the project was previously reviewed at the time of site plan approval. As a residential use, there are no unusual acoustic or olfactory impacts. The existing development is an attractive and well-landscaped project. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non-conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. City staff has determined that the property complies with requirements 1 and 2. As part of this request, the applicant seeks termination of non-conformity as to the two entrance signs which are located on the property. The signs are 45 sq. ft. each (6' high by 9' wide), where 24 sq. ft. is allowed by Code. The signs are attractively designed as part of a decorative entrance feature at each gate to the development (one on Lot 2 - easterly entrance and one on Lot 3 - westerly entrance). They are not located within any building setback. The additional size is requested in order for each of the 45 sq. ft. signs to be consistent with the scale of the entrance features to which they are attached; and compatible with the size of the property (26.99 acres). The signs are attached to entrance walls/planters that are 11 feet in height and are therefore treated as monument signs requiring a request for height increase. These structures are actually more than monument signs--they are an integral part of the security gates at each entrance. The applicant has included color photographs of the signs, which were constructed pursuant to approved permits, for staffs information and review. If the applicant were to remove the current signs and replace them with 4' x 6' signs to comply with Code, the permitted signs would be dwarfed by the wall/planter entrance features on 3 0 0 which they are located. The increased size of the signs and height of the signs is justified based on their integration with the security gate and distance from the property line-over 70' on the east entrance and over 80' on the west entrance. The applicant requests that the existing sign located in the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard be allowed to remain. Section 7 of the amended and restated annexation agreement which is part of the Park Place DRI development order (Ord. 3287-83) acknowledges that developer may locate identification signs within publicly dedicated right-of-way subject to sign regulations and review requirements as long as there is no danger to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The sign was legally permitted and constructed in this location pursuant to a variance (SV #97-10) granted by the City Commission. 8/10/2006 11:28 AM 34119.107638 #375820 v3 - Park Isle/Ex B to Flex App ORIGINAL RECEIVED ?,IjG 0 3 20L15 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4 Lot Density Acres EXHIBIT "C" Max. Density Lot 3 R/OG O 15/AC 14.85 222.75 Lot 2 R/OG O 15/AC 1.185 17.775 R/OG O 15/AC 0.474 7.11 R/OR C 18/AC 8.173 147.114 p 2:296 26.978 394.749 ORIGINAL RECEIVED t,;U(j- 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER MIN- SKETCH N.T.S. wren, crrtlrbm m.owr ywm•rr 8--," cerpa.eon PM No. B Ivf DREW STREET a' n5, 8 g G-OT25L6" A-36.51' R-610.00' 3 SHEET 2 P Aa,:l S• P.IC. -ROYALL m:l our a• ?e um,. vuc r O SHEET 3 A. I 14.85 ACRES 7? ' LOT 3 fitl, U ° 0 mdwagNd D,M1p • rrplbM.umyo[aM inn aFlwbe, arr6ee. b Clrbepe 1114 knmmn Carmv9•, Orr4R.srw-VEF n u6 Phk Nb CanMaMrk.n Oevbanrrit LLC br'rr!IEYGI° CPrpwrlan. N,Iriv..a. rm.ngr nurk•pa:,fM1m.ysRmn,M wMOBr[aeen n mryrxhro wsml m M mmdownera.Iwm": IMmgeMr mr M.I...y.+e.nrrRm mrb M aA,aal.a M1r1Wal.nneenf w Yrpl Mw F4ee. emroaP,anwiW sawra• aMMral"naeeo.nl b..aLa.rzo:,. Fbrw s1.n..r..ro.aroYah cnapre+one, F7Me•amrmbrnM cove, e1nL+N. srgme.)+. Isar, rllemre7rMI1M SvMYY mesa mxnrm.rmm.m" Rrer w,am,nsvmreow.R.9,Aeme?M1 Po[ALrrwesML.ro Ten Swvy,.kmMnYDmMerM.hsMl DYKTA, APSM -'.e NIPS m 1Wp, rrl Yra91e,.Irrrf" f: a R 1. a >(nA J(Dl. PAe, p, rB. Il.ro uaT.eYAmreo]. plmra ro a.A[a..gsabem..+er-+N,d DrAL1A, Nsvs aronesM.nem.mam M erramY aRnrYerrorn ua.R4n.n Mm..ammn a,I me PO,I6m.l Ueprrehpn naulmq AwnMnswyme„u'smema m,Crm lM SwwY ex^a ?IM1e ..mwele ro.m,+ar rdr.rw_ urn sawr[wnay.Mn Mr.e aM.afMlvropwM. M Ioa.6m rN bnr a.xwpemp,, rmNk,ee maoMrDaaonmonn nn.MhlM.mwmnmuM. rmrryaMrm.Mn.nu.ndmme swlea c-.?[.myn.,,/..almmn,mar, men•nm wmis e...mnro arM.,miny. •-' Fia+Pfae Hewn m M rlrn.Y. m.nsnaeaar..N: ,Dow(YaaW enaa+drarB, (?)byme ImpovemenM1 m M •a/WPrap.rylmen rpw'nkyprWrer,. ,VeeM1a.Ww, o. (el DYMlmpewmenM1 nu aE/anMp wr6nrt4x aMenoraa•w ePm M,ugher Prroefb. TM NullOn ar.fYYnrnerY. MOM awry, aeMD4r. rlMa'rnlrRdv,l)rLf•NM,W'rCpcM6'.nd .rrlM rM ONa mmJlrr"MrnmlbrliM6M191, Mrr Nm.mbaR IOOR brreMDrrkpo Tb.Wrwrlce enmPear.+m nxmalro M,ac/.e amP•M. M,1sen,nwe m M euw, bprMr»,m•pwaWaM1 mmw,y,era.anx rolM,mma.r.ennnwrr.annwne. m.PrmrorPomlm M.wwrn • awrbeecm.em nr B11r amarmNa. InrmO.Yan arerorewRrma m M eaq.a PrmrMY M eawewlm nYmmum.rerYplMbn rtln,MCihaanLaennmm?e h smm WY mmnramrM tee ,veka aovr y M .cws. Po rM Rdn • m.P, Mek.fre eM.aepne pueb,Mr a /tlpfswYEvarsin,,lrown m,mwJ•. M reH.a POPRB'e°°e eornr..ny.r9wMprwveyY+me•rwx m9rrn. w lnpmfi wepress. M reined rMMabn a M rr44a pmiry .Furs , mrm.meNn9Y ak.ra A*Ae. No pMMn el Mnpleperty slrownmM nwy MJ MDh • SpetlMHrnrdArw,.a bsamHM mr,rooe msvnma Rele MnpMwe M M FNr,I Em.ryrrrcy Ap,rwyblM ammwn'yP W WA M,LNPN MufM. b Ir,roeaww.le nuverony B+mr,urnY•M Mncr511nnneemp urn •M«cunn: noon WSluwyw•ro Anpper , fe. Mllfrnro NB ]351 SHEET 4 N6' -? h PARK PUCE LAND LTD. F.c.n I)xfeooooelfovln ?? ?•?•?'n A M1 ry7A fP •G Or?1 a /l V GLFNBOPOUGH EUND VIII ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC Toy rnwyY mmmevwmarydneoyw•M bevxmpveron ra MVlrmvn ord ree,M1M.m fM nurvn,vel,gxM. ' Pak 111, CPndelnlnlum Nwk,-.1. LLC Cae.po nrh Moreno emp.IB• Crnra/ ElreMe CaPllm DOyaal/oR IM1 rvcnsean rgrnlpn., .. MabnrM IMY C?M R n.nrvn vP.F vl. LLC Nnrnaan..Dl.Tyes6mnp•Y.srlmN y uMenMRdemwlsvbrryOMaP•Darr wmam-a wlurtYemnr mennlMW emw. PRUPF.N)Y A0ORE55, ORIGINAL ILO Peh P4[a H,-- RECEIVED AUS 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER LINE ' DISTANCE Lf H N02'0402'01 J. 1.21 LZ S10'J- 8J1 W 11.08 LJ_ 59!'01 {J 17.0? L1 Nff2-53 LS i 11.82 N)I'25JBE {I.99 LG- N81'J-75-5'W- 39 .11 _ N59'19 61.90 - LOT 1 DAUSCH h LOMB SURGICAL ' \ n.[.n r)nreusnsamora ' I' o- U L. L5 L6 j n ' N89'40'39"E N8910•J9"E 195.I8' ?N I65.66 - 4--1599.55- ' SHEET 7 A?9].fiJ' R.=!65.00' l \ f EMI ? ?nRFA IS INUNW)EDC mfg b , 2. l 4?. ACRES 7 SHF[I 5 w§ SHEET 6 v?/?'(JLOT 2 583'18'?! 112, M1 0' 100' I00'. ]00' LEDAL DEdCRIPnON FEE PARCELS: SLALE: 1'-I00' PARCK f: (SURVEYED) La,2-13, aSTOR? 0PNrWlA4 S. WC, PARK PLACE• dkV ro ft PM IewemNrp MPYIBook loD,vror faam.vr.DraaoueraPm.a.. PgwM•Fbm..7MWImMg.,xmrnlPrarY.m rmxnnrM Mee DNrr ml n,w)ee/ L6.1. OES-1177 N FOR EA9EMENTPARCK9: PARCEL rk(SHOWN. NOrSIRtVE ) NOmssW,M..aarrunl MM Mr.,EaP.nN f u l.mxwm malwbM Sromw.b)MmeprnueApmn"nf rFaa.e].Rwyn, fepT, m amerR.?a, eo,kwp+. ppr 1A aMPfM!c r.mm.,aPMM. cooly. Fbrklr, overlaslrOtn MlrpeeePm,dn b•on•: PARCELm:(SHO ,,WTSURVEYED) Ing h0I.WRF nrI"1013.PVN181 f, II.a aRIearlnpPYtnLWfemur,avheEa. C OP Ei..mmfr.cmneAM?L f?9R h OMPW RrmN. BPak f0f)a Pp oLmfy, FbINr Pvw•IM noon MYM Bna.Bre•f (WMw.' . ... . FN)RANCE 9pNC16EAIErPl: - ' Aaru/aYroyiap.mrkl s.amrl 1>; reRwye?psoue, wPO. feEbt Phaen cmmb. Flaw, •MDMp mar Pen/mnrM MmMen m,oR•: BEOMr mr Sa/wroJnvaLa1. 91kM10PNnMLWL.R. ala, PARXPIACE,'n r..oaem P4f 8mk 1Ba uvn form II, aMpWbrrm•W aaowM coup: Frew; elewR wro M W.NnpnMLwerlM a Mrk PYe. BmdswRl, nna.Weh CMb4lrxad?BLd 0110. Wpe 10p, aMPBDlknmrW aPMrns CawM. FMId., BouBr SvOS00'F.q bee.W lerB dnrlcr YrNq.W WulrpmDaay Bn. MvM3p'6OgY Wr,C ,f f6(m M(' mrem NarRr l0YbE0•F.rb37.WFnC lOrrR'.I VEr 69•eiOV' W,N b fSW MC mnn NoM JOltlt?FnL b10.06 Y•C Bwlae Nam e9'31W' Wrel /a ROB ArM, Mmn Nam JO'CtlW EuC Ia[ 1,.00 MI b M9wm MimW,M dour Loll; urea[. abrlp wM 3eulll DomWyldv, 9wrM e?'S1W'FM fw-9aBOM1 b M POUIT OFG£OOVNIFKL -avo- PBND EASFMFNrnn. r(sFromx NorsLlxYFmDJ Avme.raYReyswlxam s.oend rr rmRRnp2psaArL R.rmr fe F.n Pm.rn ca.M. F?DD,N merePMhOA.MMrsmrBn RlEbxa: VIIALe Kslq`l0 NE OD'm01 DOnpRa?K3 ?R. 0!-I!m I/SJ/Dl Re./MR 4 FLOODZONF: lIWprepryb berMhfbre DSw% a tro'3r. "? Nolea ti i07, = I. NY/Onn•enr.prWpncvNrr,emwA.dYL+N,.ekotlwdoonnrnn MN mk6r.lMlMPMba,IXYbPKCSluln Mrsm.u Nlw88ml mmsmMrenE.19%BM181, Y,Weey CMapn TRNko,vMn Cwprny, rube NOwmDrS ? 4, ,?[b• NOR Nb.rrar a/MP1db Rrron411n Dwlnxwh'Rrls eRk,. .?'` I. EYMewn.DmRrMean.pnY..n hYr.rotlMntlnMlkeMMe•nbNem NOVD-2O. PARK PLACE BLOC. LTD. a rMpmM'D'.Mrmm MrMYYMaWryaie/almreMMl9e wmMmnmf. .?^ p[x IlnfeWJOaO.owaO A. Urn.RDe.nM,M+xw rroMayeVniwdwtla{Fbbn pcwn.W.uwrivarrreOPermb drrwim, earlL .-. pYlnmpYbhbmrbrlpmnneay.MYlml wld 6. TM.,awy cMMlb MMhmda•bbMdWllburMe.PetlM esR(en pemo'nbnaW Mn SUrvaYhB LbRVn6M. R EwrplneeawL l.wlpm.le•ronwmY,nna e.umer•Mawl MpWmn rrmlbnra. , LmdwpeurMYnm•m.na Lnend. •R Al"Mer MaRlMnmde MffepfewMrlwy ywN'em4n am.rxhr n,Y6 8. Md?M rMwn N1111YfMl.vbben eba Mnm,n bMMroRb, flNnp w..MyMmM wayrRM MWbaIM e.Y ,nwygMMM fa Mawn••edneex pfrprbnpnMbbY Mw e,nbgpplrrrmma. a..M,?aD.n Mr.aeaMM,•e.Mnll a9atWhpewmM rMbMRwbMCar4 r•nenMalr Mlalln N,smnlM Mr baxknaM mlwwvnmbPw ALTAIACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR. PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEYELOPUM LLC MHURC6 mRvmrrtm CIO, y c0 Gp4',?iy ? S9? •O?, cF. WSJ ? tissJ OBOO ??J ???g' 9 F 7?; 00 001 s?oo ?FJ -,,ooo, 's LOCATION OF ENTRANCE SIGNS IrA. ?Q) VCi 14D Oj? ?oQ Q.- 4v O0V. l3ro .o• ? \ 00 V??G VJ?O 4 G ?rO?O? \OO, O O' h O? f7 S ??G ?pLL (? 0 O. - Tl G7 m 00 DD <Z rv r'rt D Q7 r'-y 1 0 ing" Both signs have the same dimensions. 0 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED qIG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Park Isle Entrance - West 1 ¦ ¦ y Park Isle Entrance - East 1 PARK ISLE A* .6 ft - ?. R IM, !k / ilk-1Y1??1? i ? f •? Park ? Lice- IloulevaYd Lt: 1 lst I?1eW r lip J W Park 1,1-ace Boulevard -:t -ult-to-Bcc,, Boulevard - West View m r low ,i i. . d . oil m 9 SIGN AREA = 19.5 SQ.FT. STRUCTURE AREA =2M SQ.FT. ' 47.6 SQ.FT. Aroo 7tOa ' C c , O r w m N i a .ni in m s 'imp .r t Ras rise m g m • , t c' 12 a n, 1? r 1 a m ?. ?.?..?. ?.. sum • r Drawing name: Z: W.O. 4011 LOT 1 4001-5000\11\4011.dwg Model May 11, 2006 d:X)am`9- 41.82 > 99 ,E 47.02„ ES ,5 3435,. E 4",. 38 N 83 04'43 225 ?0? W NO 00 N O no Z N CA ;, LOT 2 CONSERVATION AND ti .? Os N Sg?j, 630 A 0 aa w J Q U w ti A? ARSE. T(? SOUTHERLY LINE OF L 0 T I A 5939 J6, ?91F S ;7 j.8'52 5'26" E "NATURAL AREA" 134;1 52. 11 , SKETCH-OF-LEGAL S 855„ E SECTION 17, TWP. 29 S., RGE. 16 E. PINELLAS COUNoT aORIDA RECEIVED S 6 LOT 1 5939 80, A9ry F S 89'40'39" W 195.18' POB 0- DRAINAGE EASEMENT Alg) co /_Iv? cl LOT 2 kUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER POC SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE CONSERVATION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT "NATURAL AREA", STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, ACCORDING TO MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 109, PAGES 10-11, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF SAID STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, THENCE RUN S 89'40'39" W. ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 195.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CONSERVATION AND DRAINAGE EASMENT "NATURAL AREA", SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE CONSERVATION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT "NATURAL AREA" THE FOLLOWING COURSES; S 59'39'49" E. A DISTANCE OF 49.76 FEET; S 77'57'26" E, A DISTANCE OF 48.52 FEET; S 25'56'27" E, A DISTANCE OF 109.62 FEET; S 27'21'50" W. A DISTANCE OF 89.63 FEET; S 31'56'50" W, A DISTANCE OF 65.18 FEET; S 18'24'48" W, A DISTANCE OF 50.03 FEET; N 82'52'37" W. A DISTANCE OF 134.19 FEET; N 37'32'35" W, A DISTANCE OF 49.76 FEET; N 43'18'29" W, A DISTANCE OF 44.87 FEET; N 59'27'34" W. A DISTANCE OF 63.06 FEET; N 39'13'05" W, A DISTANCE OF 57.14 FEET; N 21'34'31" W, A DISTANCE OF 79.18 FEET; N 02'04'59" E. A DISTANCE OF 80.32 FEET; N 40'38'34" E, A DISTANCE OF 41.06 FEET; N 83'04'43" E, A DISTANCE OF 47.02 FEET; S 75'34'35" E. A DISTANCE OF 41.82 FEET; N 72'25'38" E, A DISTANCE OF 41.99 FEET; S 81'37'55" E, A DISTANCE OF 52.11 FEET; S 59'39'49" E, A DISTANCE OF 67.80 FEET BACK TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2.296 ACRES MORE OR LESS. 3 THIS IS NOT a. O ?O co I, DENNIS J. EIRE, THE SURVEYOR THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON ARE ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE MINN FLORIDA STATUTES (OR RULE CHAPT UNLESS SEALED WITH AN EMBOSSED b??lFlsttr?,.??? A 13,4- RVEY! ON Ilhf-Ct,HA?G HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AND TH AID M OUND SURVEY AND SKETCH M? KNI GE yN?j I FIIRjHER CERTIFY N. AL TANDARDS IN -SECTION 472.027, 00 Ln co LILJ V (n J ? ? N W ~ LL_ ? w (n W y D w N or- Q ? E-4 IY Q LPL Z Q N 00 W _J C) O = 1 Q_ ° a O 0 N W o D? R1.? t s . QT Qm W DE tl,rE1? No. 2865 3 V DA'f1:111' ? 06 O 2 0 ALTERED IN I#*:? 20055128$4 BK:? 14830 PG: 1126, 12/23/2005 at 02:44 PM, RECORDING 9 PAGES $-8.00 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION sqft KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PI LAS 'CouNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKTDW1 i t .t .t CftpT& saa? PNIMr.. Two 6 d'' U This instrument prepared 6r under the supervision of: Cox, Castle & Nicholsdrt-LLP 2049 Century Park East,' 28th Floor Los Angeles, Caleomi 90067 Attention: Arb .. Vttells, Esq. WHEN RECOkMD MAIL TO AND MAILTAX„STATEMENT TO: Park•lsle°Goridominium Development, LLC Uo Juhari LeCraw & Company I AUaAa Technology Center .,1575;Nbrthside Drive, NW Atlant2, Georgia 30318 "-Attention: Bobby West ?• -,`Property Folio Nos.: 17-29-16-85546-000-0020 & 17-29 16- 85546-000-0020 Grantee's Tax ID No.: 20-3868103 QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF FLORIDA § § KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF PINELLAS § THAT, CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a public entity ("Grantor'), whose mailing address is c/o BlackRock Realty Advisors, Inc., 50 California Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94111, attention: Lorenz Menrath, for and in consideration. of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid to Grantor by PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company C' Grantee'), whose mailing address is c/o Julian LeCraw & Company, 100 Atlanta Technology Center, Suite 200, 1575 Northside Drive, NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30318, attention: Bobby West, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which considerations are hereby acknowledged, hereby remises, releases, and quitclaims unto the Grantee any right, title and interest of Grantor, if any, in that certain land, situated in Pinellas County, State of Florida, viz: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF ORIGINAL RECEIVED 4,U G.0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 49651\1182592v1 I PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14630 PG 1127 EXECUTED on the daw.of the acknowledgment herein below, to be effective however as of the "7 VA- day of Decer%1>Zer,-2005. Signed in the presence of CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a public entity z` By:r? Name: -?„' Chief Investment Officer Title: ORIGINAL RECEIVED AU G 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARINIFNI CITY OF CLEARWATER 49651\1182592x1 2 PINEI;IM C6UNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14830 PG 1128 i STATE OF CALIFORNIA'--% c ) ss. COUNTY OF ?h'alM 'a ) 2005, before me, the dersigned, a No ry lic in and for said CozlntY -. ati State, personally appeared prIS i -? personally knowtr.to me o sidenti d who has proven t6 lie-IM person(c)-whose name(s) is/are-subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledg4f&,me that he/sheAltey executed the same in his/hoB4heir authorized capacity(ies), and that t y,his/ ""heir signature(s) on the instrument the person( or the entity upon behalf of which the jierson(&)-acted, executed the within instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. r Not bli MARY ANN AVANM C40WO t M • 14M47 Npby Mft - CGWMft ,a p-- " IIRIrO CCU* we1U ma"now2k ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG3 0 3 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4%51U 182592vi PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14830 PG 1129 Exhibit A Legal Description [see attached] " C l i'- "1? `K ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 200^0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4965111182592v1 Exhibit A PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14830 PG 1130 ;. i EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL I LOT 2 A tract of land being all of Lot 2, according to the plat of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE; -a8,recorded in Plat Book 109, pages 10 through 11, of the public records of Pinellas, ,60&ty Florida, and lying within the Northwest % of Section 17, Township 29 . South, R?pge ?1$ East, Pinellas County Florida, being more particularly described as follows:- ; ' BEG1k-aifh6 Northeast comer of said Lot 2; thence along the North boundary lines of saii3;C4'2-.the following nine (9) courses: (1) thence South 89°40'39' West, for 195.18 f4e1'??)'thence North 59°39'49' West, for 67.80 feet; (3) thence North 81'37'55" West, f0?82:11 feet-, (4) thence South 72025'38' West, for 41.99 feet; (5) thence North x'34'35' West, for 41.82 feet; (6) thence South 83°04'43' West, for 47.02 feet; (7) ;'etlce South 40°38'34' West; for 41.06 feet; (8) thence South 02°04'59" West, for 4.23 f "` feet; (9) thence South 89°40'39" West,. for 165.65 feet to the point of intersection with a ',-?r?on-tangent curve concave to the West, said point also. being the point of intersection the Easterly right-of-way line of Park Place Boulevard, as recorded in aforesaid plat; thence Southerly along said right-of-way line and the arc of said curve with a radial bearing of North 75°11'54' West, and having a radius of 365.00 feet, a central angle of 15°19'54', an arc length of 97.67 feet and a chord bearing South 22°280. West, for 97.67 feet to the point of tangency; thence South 30°08'00' West, along said right-of- way line, a distance of 457.64 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the West, having a radius of 2000.00 feet and a central angle of 00'23'52'; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve a distance of 13.89 feet to a point; thence South 57°38'27' East, departing. said right-of-way line, a distance of 195.86 feet to a point; thence South 32°21'33' West, a distance of 60.00 feet to a point; thence South 30°13'6.9' East, a distance of 252.93 feet to a- point; thence North 30°01'50' East, a distance of 211.83 feet to a point; thence South 59°58'10' East, a distance of 190.00 feet to a point; thence North 30°01'50' East, a distance of 278.85 `feet to a point; thence South 85°19'21' East, a distance of 232.23 feet to a point; thence North 00°19'21' West, along the East tine of said Lot 2 and the West right-of-ay line: of Hampton Road (C.R. 144) a distance of 564.52 feet to said Northeast comer and the POINT OF BEGINNING. ORIGINAL RECEIVED t,, IG 0 3 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14830 PG 1131 `Y`om t LOT 3 `? ? A tract of land .being all of Lot 3, according to the plat of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, as'recorded in Plat Book 109, pages 10 through 11, of the public records of Pinellas..Cou", 'Florida, and lying within the Northwest % of Section 17, Township 29 South, Rari0116, ast. Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:: , BEGtM al _fl'4'Southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence along the Westerly right-of-way line of Palk Ptar:e Boulevard and the East .line of said Lot 3, North 30°08'00' East, a distance 01'34$53 feet to the beginning of a curve. concave to the West having a radius of 285.00 fedt`and-'a central angle of 58°53'31'; thence Northerly, along the arc of said curve, a , aistence of 292.94 feet to the point of tangency; thence North 28°45'31' West, a _ 40tarice of 240.13 feet.to the beginning of a curve concave to the East having a radius ,ol 590.00 feet and a central angle of 32°15'06"; thence Northerly, along the are of said .; `?rfve, a distance of 388.40 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the West, °? ... having a radius of 61.0.00 feet and a central angle.of 3°2546'; thence Northerly, along ---'the arc of said curve, a distance. of 36.51 feet to the point of tangency; thence North 00°03'49" East, a distance of 190.21 feet to a point; thence North 44*56'11*.West, a t^.^ distance of 35.36 fee( to a point; thence: North 89°561.1' West, along the North line of said Lot 3 and the South right-of-way line of Drew Street (C:13.108), .a distance of 357.62 feet to the Northwest comer of said Lot-3; thence South 0092728' West, departing said South right-of-way line and along the West line of said Lot 3, a. distance of 1287.33 feet to a point, thence along the South boundary lines of said Lot 3, the following five (5) courses: (1) thence North 89°5449" East for 50.00 feet; (2) thence South 45905"11' East for 208.00 feet; (3) thence North 00'05'11' West for 120.15 feet; (4) thence North 89°54'49' East for 97.31. feet; (5) thence South 59°52'00' East for 153:00 feet to said Southeast comer and the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above-described property contains 14.85 acres and is shown on that certain ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey for Park Isle Condominium Development, LLC by Wallace Surveying Corp., Craig L Wallace, Florida Certificate No. 3357, dated July 12, 2005, last revised December 12, 2005, which survey is incorporated herein and made a part of this description. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR EASEMENT PARCELS: .PARCEL Il: a+. Non-exclusive easement for the benefit of Parcel 1 as recited in that certain Stormwater Management.Agreement recorded January 27, 1997, In Official Records Book 9591, page 29, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, over and across the land described as follows: ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14830 PG 1132 2 A tract of land being.a'portion of Lot 1, according to the plat of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE,, b,s4korded in Plat Book 109, pages 10 through 11, of the public records on Pinellas. County, Florida, and lying within the Northwest % of Section 17, Township 29 South,'Rarige 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: .BEGIN at 1116--Sgytheast comer of said Lot 1; thence along the South boundary lines of said Lot 1,, tt? foilbwing nine (9) courses: (1) thence South 89°40'39' West, for 195.18 feet; (2) t eq'qe'North 59°39'49' West, for 67.80 feet; (3) thence North 81°37'55' West, for 52..1-1, t; (4) thence South 72°25'38' West, for 41.99 feet; (5) thence North 75.3 3?" 11r!e`st, for 41.82 feet; (6) thence South 83°04'43 West, for 47.02 feet; (7) their Sduth 41 °38'34° West, for 41.06 feet; (8) thence South 02°04'59" West, for 4.23 fee;9?thence South 89°40'39' West; for 165.65 feet to the point of intersection with a or agent curve coneaveto the West, said point also being:tha point of intersection ;with the Easteriy right-of-way line of Park Place Boulevard, as recorded in aforesaid plat; fieriae Northwesterty along said right-of-way line and the arc.of said curve with a radial :' bearing of North 75°11'54` West. and having a radius of 365.00 feet, a central angle of 039'54", an arc length of 188.98 feet and chord bearing North 00°01'51' West, for 186.88 feet to the point of intersection with a ndn-tangent line; thence North 75°08'12' _r "East, for 47.9.4 feet to the point of intersection with anon-tangent curve concave, to the Northeast: thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curve, with a radiat bearing of ?l North 45°53'10" East, and having a radius of 136:00 feet; a central angle of 46°12'31", and arc length of 109.68 feet, and a chord bearing South 67'13'06' East,` for 106.73 feet to the point of tangency; thence North 89°4939" East, for 47.40 feet; thence South 00°19'21' East, for 62.00 feet; thence North 89°40'39' East, for 218.08 feet to the point of curvature of a curve concave: to the Northwest; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, having a radius of. 181:00 feet, a ,central angle of 60°42'42', an arc length of 191.79 feet and a chord Bearing North 59°19'18' East, for 182.94 feet to the point of intersection with a non-tangent One; thence North 89°40'39' East, for:56.14 feet to the point of intersection with the Westerly right-of-way line of Hampton Road, as recorded in aforesaid plat, said right-of-way line also being 43.00 feet West of and parallel to the North-South centerline of said Section 17; thence South 00°19'21' East, along said right- of-way line, for 187.48 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL III: Non-Exclusive Limited Easements for the benefit of Parcel I as :recited in that certain Easement recorded July 21,. 1998, in Official Records Book 10173, .Page.2611, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida over and across the land described as follows: ENTRANCE SIGN EASEMENT: A parcel of land tying within Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGIN at the Southeast comer of Lot 3, STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, as recorded in Plat Book 109, pages 10 and 11, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along the West right-of-way line of Park Place Boulevard,;as recorded in Official records Book 9119, page 409„of the :public records of Pinellas County, Florida, South 30°08'00' East, for 69.00 feet; thence leaving said West right-of way line, North 59°52'00' West, for 10.00 feet; thenceNorth 30108'00' East for 32.00 feet; thence North ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUS 0 3 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER . PINEIIAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14830 PG 1133 59°52'00' West,. for I8 0G feet; thence North 30°08'00' East, for 20.00 feet; thence North 59°52'00' West, fof ?.tjc3 feet; thence North 30°0$'00' East, for 17.00 feet to the South boundary line of s4la.. t'3; thence along said South boundary line, South 59°52'00' East, for 30.00 feetta the POINT OF BEGINNING. AND- POND EASPENT NO. 2: A parcel.', lying within Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas Counfyi, f={ofida, and being more particularly described as follows: COJWMENCE at the Southeast comer of Lot 3, STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PtJK 1k,`as recorded in Plat Book 109, pages 10-11, of the public records of Pinellas to?uhty, Florida, thence along the Westerly right-of-way line of Park Place Boulevard, as 4bcorded in Official Records Book 9119, page 409, of the public records of Pinellas J Caunty, Florida, South 30°08'00' West, for 69.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; ' %4nce continue along said Westerly right-oPway line, South 30°08'00' West, for 72.11 ' f6t to a curve concave to the Northwest; thence Southwesterly along the arc of said `- 'curve having a radius of 1920,00 feet, a central angle of 13°44'33', an arc length.of 460.52 feet and a chord bearing. South 37°00'17' West, for 459.41 feet to a norkangent line; thence North 46'07'27' West, for 42.00 feet. to anon-tangent curve concave to the Northwest; thence Northeasterly along the arc of.said curve having a radius of 1878.00 feet, a central angle of 13.44'33', an arc length of 450.44 feet and a chord bearing North 37°00'17' East, for 449.37 feet to.a point of tangency; thence North 30°08'00' East, for 54.11 feet; thence North 14°52'00' West, for 16.97 feet; thence North 59°52'00" West, for 78.75 feet; thence South 89°54'49 West, for 77.06 feet to the Southerly boundary line of said Lot 13; thence along said Southerly boundary line, North 00°05'11' West, for 75.00 feet, thence North 89°5449' East, for 97.31 feet; thence South 59452'00' East, for 123.00 feet; thence leaving said Southerly boundary line, South 30°08'00' West, for 17.00 feet; thence South 59'52'00' East, for 5.00 feet; thence South 30°06'00' West, for 20.00feet; thence South 59°52'00' East, for 15.00 feet ; thence South 30°08'00' West, for 32.00 feet; thence South 59°52'00' East, for 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2000" PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PIftftAB CbuNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 14630 PG 1134 a i t t`t PARCEL IV: Non-exciustvq; easements appurtenant to and for the benefit of Parcel 1 as created ?itogt?ertain Easement and Restrictive Covenant Agreement executed by and,betweefi Gulf Bay venture, a general partnership, and MDC Partnership, in Official 0'gt orris Book,5978, page 2110; as modified by that certain First Modifi WI8 0 to Easement and Restrictive Covenants Agreement in Official R d` ook 6256, page 1111; and Confirmation of Cross Easements recorded 1g. (*f lb Records Book 7830, page 2386 and Official Records Book 7830, page 2390; Confirmation of Cross Easements recorded in Official Records Book 8539; ^tipae''1411 and Waiver of Rights, given by Storz Ophthaimics, Inc., :a Delaware corporation, recorded March 11, in Official Records Book 9635, page 511; acid Waiver of-Rights given by Park Place Land Ltd., a Florida limited _partnership, recorded March 11, 1997, in Official Records Book 9635, page 513; and Waiver of Rights given by Park Place Building, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership recorded March i t 1997, in Official Records Book 9535; page 514, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida., for the purposes setforth therein,. ti ,j ' over and across the land set forth therein. PARCEL V: Non-exclusive easements appurtenant to and for the benefit of Parcel 1, as created in that certain Non-F-xciusive Public Right-of-Way Easement granted by the City of Clearwater recorded June 24, 1998, in Official Records Book 10143, page 1222; as re-recorded with attached Maintenance Agreement on July 20, 1998, in Official Records Book 10172, page 2232, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, for the purposes set. forth therein, over and across the land set forth therein. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ,AUG 0 3 2000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 5/25/2006 q Receipt #: 1200600000000005405 11:24:43AM Date: 05/25/2006 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-05029 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid A* Check JULIAN LECRAW AND CO LLC R_D 8006 In Person 1,205.00 ORIGINAL RECEIVED MAY 2 5 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Payment Total: $1,205.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cReceipt.rpt Page 1 of 1 C,,V q I IR t • FLD2006-05029 100 PARK PLACE BLVD S Date Received: 05/25/2006 PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEV. ZONING DISTRICT: O ORIGINAL LAND USE: R/OG QG 0 3 2006 P KING DEPARTMENT ATLAS PAGE: 291A CIMOFCLEgRWATER PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLW CoverSheet Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 2:07 PM To: 'fcollins@jmgrealty.com' Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Attachments: Unity of Title Declaration 1.15.10.doc Fred - Based on the history listed under Case FLD2006-05029, the overall property was developed in 1998 for a total of 390 attached dwelling units. The overall property is located on Park Place Blvd in two parts, one part on the east side of Park Place Blvd and the other part on the west side of Park Place Blvd. While separated by Park Place Blvd, the overall property was developed as one entity. The Declaration of Unity of Title ensures that the overall development is planned, developed and maintained as an integral project, where no portion of the overall property can be sold off to be under separate ownership. The Declaration of Unity of Title must be signed by the property owner, and includes the addresses (100 and 101 Park Place Blvd) and the legal description for the property being tied together (legal description for the east and west parts of the overall property). The effect of such Declaration of Unity of Title is that the overall property must remain one lot for development purposes (cannot be sold as separate east and west parts). I am attaching a copy of the Declaration of Unity of Title for your information and use, where you can see the provisions of the Declaration of Unity of Title in the document. Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne From: Fred Collins [mailto:fcollins@jmgrealty.com] Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 12:48 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne I have sent the Declaration of Unity of Title to the ownership for signature. The ownership entity has asked me to explain exactly what the document purpose is and what effects the document will have on the property. I am not familiar with the document in question. Can you please give me some insight on the document so that I may communicate it's propose to the ownership. Thank you, Fred Collins JMG Realty, Inc. From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:18 PM To: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Cc: GrandReserve@jmgrealty.com; Rick.Albee@myClearwater.com Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Fred - I have reviewed the revised submitted plans and have revised all my comments to "Met" except the following: Need to record a Declaration of Unity of Title in the public records tying both sides together as one lot for development purposes. Form available from Planning. . ., • • Deal with Rick regarding his comments (below) so that the permit can be issued and hopefully construction will be completed soon so we can move on. If you would like me to review the Unity of Title document prior to recording, to make sure it is done properly, let me know. Thanks, Wayne From: Fred Collins [mailto:fcollins@jmgrealty.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:13 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: GrandReserve@jmgrealty.com; Elbo, Bennett; Albee, Rick Subject: RE: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne- Thanks for the quick response. I will coordinate and respond to the comments when received from all departments. Thank you, Fred Collins JMG Realty, Inc. From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myC[earwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:01 PM To: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Cc: GrandReserve@jmgrealty.com; Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com; Rick.Albee@myClearwater.com Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Fred - Thanks. Yes, the plans were received and are under review. Rick Albee (Trees, 562-4741) and Bennett Elbo (Traffic, 562- 4775) have already reviewed the plans. Bennett has approved the revised plans. Rick's comments are: 1. Have the contractor call me to set up a preconstruction meeting on site to discuss possible root pruning, erosion control and tree barricade requirements. 2. Install tree barricades to City of Clearwater standards, 2x2 post with 1x4 rails at two thirds of the trees drip line and/or in the root prune lines. 1 Install silt fence to the manufacture's specifications. DO NOT TRENCH UNDER TREES. 4. Replace two native shade trees prior to final inspection. I will review the plans this week. I will let you know if there are any Zoning comments still to be addressed. Wayne Wells, AICP 562-4504 From: Fred Collins [mailto:fcollins@jmgrealty.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: GrandReserve@jmgrealty.com Subject: RE: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne As you may know, Craig Brashier is ngger with King Engineering. Until Craig's larture, he was the point of contact with your department with regards to The Grand Reserve Apartments. Can you please inform me of the status for permit (BCP2009-06049)? I need to know if the requested 8 copies of the plans were received by the building department and if any additional information is required. if I need to speak to a separate department to inquire about the above noted permit status, please advise as to who I should be speaking with. Thank you, Fred Collins Construction Consultant JMG Realty, Inc. 2174 Harris Ave. NE. Suite 7 Palm Bay FL. 32905 Office 321-728-4447 ext 105 Office 813-466-5720 Fax 321-725-3352 Cell 321-508-0331 www.jmgrealty.com fcollins@jmgrealty.com From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:11 AM To: CBrashier@kingengineering.cbm Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Craig - Thanks. Please submit 8 copies of the plans to the Building Department. Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne - We are working on getting up-to-date zoning shapefiles from the City of Clearwater so that we can update Page 1 of the Grand Reserve plans. We were unable to get this info last week. We will resubmit before Friday, January 8, as stated in your email below. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II King Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - MIAMI - AUSTIN - DALLAS 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMP*3634 • V-813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineer'ing.com <W ayne.W eI Is@myC Iearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 12/24/2009 11:19 AM cc: <Bennett.EIbo@myCIearwater.com>, <Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com>, <Scott.Rice@myCIearwater.com>, <Rick.AIbee@myCIearwater.com>, <Robert.Tefft@MyCIearwater.com>, <fcoIIins@jmgrealty.com> Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - This project was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on October 17, 2006, with two conditions. Condition #1 stated: "That, within 90 days of CDB approval, an application be submitted for building permits to construct handicap sidewalk access between building, common facilities and the public sidewalk within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way, in a location and manner acceptable to the Engineering and Planning Departments, including the submission of a tree survey to minimize tree impacts." An application for a building permit was submitted January 18, 2007, in an attempt to comply with this time frame (BCP2007-01343). City reviews were performed in January and February, 2007. There was no additional activity on this building permit, even after being notified in January 2008. This building permit was voided March 4, 2008. A meeting was held April 5, 2008, to discuss the proposal. We have had additional meetings with meeting notes prepared and numerous emails. Finally, a new building permit application was submitted June 3, 2009 (BCP2009-06049). All City reviews were completed in June 2009. By letter dated November 19; 2009, the.City• notified you of no response or activity within the past five months since providing our comments to you and giving you 30 days to respond or the permit would be voided. You have now submitted on December 17, 2009, a letter of response, with no revised plans, to avoid this permit being voided by the City. The City does not review response letters without the associated revised plans; therefore, no letter of review of these responses will be provided. Please provide eight copies revised plans responding to our prior comments for review by the City by January 8, 2010. If you have questions regarding appropriate means of responding to the City comments previously provided, it is recommended to correspond and/or meet with the specific reviewer prior to the above deadline. Failure to do such will result in Code Compliance action for failure to comply with the approval granted by the CDB. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 5 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 1:18 PM To: 'fcollins@jmgrealty.com' Cc: Grand Reserve@jmgrealty.com; Albee, Rick Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Fred - I have reviewed the revised submitted plans and have revised all my comments to "Met" except the following: Need to record a Declaration of Unity of Title in the public records tying both sides together as one lot for development purposes. Form available from Planning. Deal with Rick regarding his comments (below) so that the permit can be issued and hopefully construction will be completed soon so we can move on. If you would like me to review the Unity of Title document prior to recording, to make sure it is done properly, let me know. Thanks, Wayne From: Fred Collins [mailto:fcollins@jmgrealty.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:13 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: GrandReserve@jmgrealty.com; Elbo, Bennett; Albee, Rick Subject: RE: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne- Thanks for the quick response. I will coordinate and respond to the comments when received from all departments. Thank you, Fred Collins JMG Realty, Inc. From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 5:01 PM To: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Cc: GrandReserve@jmgrealty.com; Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com; Rick.Albee@myClearwater.com Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Fred - Thanks. Yes, the plans were received and are under review. Rick Albee (Trees, 562-4741) and Bennett Elbo (Traffic, 562- 4775) have already reviewed the plans. Bennett has approved the revised plans. Rick's comments are: 1. Have the contractor call me to set up a preconstruction meeting on site to discuss possible root pruning, erosion control and tree barricade requirements. 2. Install tree barricades to City of Clearwater standards, 2x2 post with 1x4 rails at two thirds of the trees drip line and/or in the root prune lines. 1 3. Install silt fence to the manure's specifications. DO NOT TRENCH UNOTREES. 4. Replace two native shade trees prior to final inspection. I will review the plans this week. I will let you know if there are any Zoning comments still to be addressed. Wayne Wells, AICP 562-4504 From: Fred Collins [mailto:fcollins@jmgrealty.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1:02 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: GrandReserve@jmgrealty.com Subject: RE: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne As you may know, Craig Brashier is no longer with King Engineering. Until Craig's departure, he was the point of contact with your department with regards to The Grand Reserve Apartments. Can you please inform me of the status for permit (BCP2009-06049)? I need to know if the requested 8 copies of the plans were received by the building department and if any additional information is required. If I need to speak to a separate department to inquire about the above noted permit status, please advise as to who I should be speaking with. Thank you, Fred Collins Construction Consultant JIVIG Realty 'Inc. 2174 Harris Ave. NE. Suite 7 Palm Bay FL. 32905 Office 321-728-4447 ext 105 Office 813-466-5720 Fax 321-725-3352 Cell 321-508-0331 www.jmgrealty.com fcollins@jmgrealty.com From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:11 AM To: CBrashier@kingengineering.com Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Craig - Thanks. Please submit 8 copies of the plans to the Building Department. Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve • Wayne - • We are working on getting up-to-date zoning shapefiles from the City of Clearwater so that we can update Page 1 of the Grand Reserve plans. We were unable to get this info last week. We will resubmit before Friday, January 8, as stated in your email below. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II Kin Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - MIAMI - AUSTIN - DALLAS 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com <Wayne.Wel Is@myC learwater.com> To: <C13rashier@kingengineering.corn> 12/24/2009 11:19 AM cc: <Bennett.EIbo@rnyC1earwater.com>, <Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com>, <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com>, <Rick.Albee@myCleanvater.com>, <Robert.Tefft@MyClearwater.com>, <fcollins@jmg realty.com> Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - This project was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on,October;;17,- 2Q06, with two conditions. Condition #1 stated: "That, within 90 days of CDB approval, an application be submitted for building permits to construct handicap sidewalk access between building, common facilities and the public sidewalk within.the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way, in a location and manner acceptable to the Engineering and Planning Departments, including the submission of a tree survey to minimize tree impacts." An application for a building permit was submitted January 18, 2007, in an attempt to comply with this time frame (BCP2007-01343). City reviews were performed in January and February, 2007. There was no additional activity on this building permit, even after being notified in January 2008. This building permit was voided March 4, 2008. A meeting was held April 5, 2008, to discuss the proposal. We have had additional meetings with meeting notes prepared and numerous emails. Finally, a new building permit application was submitted June 3, 2009 (BCP2009-06049). All City reviews were completed in June 2009. By letter dated November 19, 2009, the City notified you of no response or activity within the past five months since providing our comments to you and giving you 30 days to respond or the permit would be voided. You have now submitted on December 17, 2009, a letter of response, with no revised plans, to avoid this permit being voided by the City. The City does not review response letters without the associated revised plans; therefore, no letter of review of these responses will be provided. Please provide eight copies revised plans responding to our prior comments for review by the City by January 8, 2010. If you have questions regarding appropriate means of minding to the City comments previousorovided, it is recommended to correspond and/or meet with the specific reviewer prior to the above deadline. Failure to do such will result in Code Compliance action for failure to comply with the approval granted by the CDB. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 4 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Craig Brashier [craig.brashier@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 4:00 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; mross@kingengineering.com Subject: Grand Reserve Project Good afternoon, Wayne. Unfortunately I no longer work at King Engineering. Please update your contacts for this project to include Mike Ross as the King Engineering contact. Also make sure that you include Fred Collins on all correspondence, as he represents the applicant. Thanks for you help and have a nice weekend. Craig Brashier 0 0 Wells,,Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 4:24 PM To: 'D.Craig Brashier' Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Yes, I gave them to the Building Department to enter as a response to comments so that all department reviewers can look at the revised plans to see if their comments can be marked as "met" now. Thanks for the submission. From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 4:20 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne - Did you receive the revised plans that we sent over to you last Thursday? D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II K n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - MIAMI - AUSTIN - DALLAS 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com <W avn e. W eI I s0rnvC I ea rwate r. com> To: <CBrashiera,kingengineering.com> 01/04/2010 10:11 AM cc: < coIIins(a)imgrealty.COm> Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - Thanks. Please submit 8 copies of the plans to the Building Department. Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [:mailto:CBrashier(d%kingengineerin?,,.cornl Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: fcollins(d jmf realty.com Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne - We are working on getting up-to-date zoning shapefiles from the City of Clearwater so that we can update Page 1 of the Grand Reserve plans. We were unable to get th*o last week. We will resubmit before Frida Wary 8, as stated in your email below. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II K ng Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - MIAMI - AUSTIN - DALLAS 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-5974987 ww\y.KingE,ntinecr4L co <NVas,ne. W el Is(d mvCleatwater.com> To: <Cl3rashier t kinenineering.com> 12/24/2009 11:19 AM cc: <13ennett Flho!a mvC;leankater com> <Hi nanshu Pami,ri mC'learwater com>, <Sc_ott Rice r,;mv0eaiu,ater.com>, <Rick.Albeeu;,mvC.leirwater.com>,<Robert.leflt`nMvCle r ater.com>,<lcollinslajmerealtv.com> Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - This project was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on October 17, 2006, with two conditions. Condition #1 stated: "That, within 90 days of CDB approval, an application be submitted for building.permits to construct handicap sidewalk access between building, common facilities and the public sidewalk within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way, in a location and manner acceptable to the Engineering and Planning Departments, including the submission of a tree survey to minimize tree impacts." An application for a building permit was submitted January 18, 2007, in an attempt to comply with this time frame (BCP2007-01343). City reviews were performed in January and February, 2007. There was no additional activity on this building permit, even after being notified in January 2008. This building permit was voided March 4, 2008. A meeting was held April 5, 2008, to discuss the proposal. We have had additional meetings with meeting notes prepared and numerous emails. Finally, a new building permit application was submitted June 3, 2009 (BCP2009-06049). All City reviews were completed in June 2009. By letter dated November 19, 2009, the City notified you of no response or activity within the past five months since providing our comments to you and giving you 30 days to respond or the permit would be voided. You have now submitted on December 17, 2009, a letter of response, with no revised plans, to avoid this permit being voided by the City. The City does not review response letters without the associated revised plans; therefore, no letter of review of these responses will be provided. Please provide eight copies revised plans responding to our prior comments for review by the City by January 8, 2010. If you have questions regarding appropriate means of responding to the City comments previously provided, it is recommended to correspond and/or meet with the specific reviewer prior to the above deadline. Failure to do such will result in Code Compliance action for failure to comply with the approval granted by the CDB. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 • Fax: 727-562-4865 • i Wells, Wayne From: Williams, Jeremy Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 2:00 PM To: 'CBrashier@kingengineering.com' Cc: Wells, Wayne; Larremore, Dave M. Subject: City of Clearwater Zoning Data Attachments: image003.png Craig, Please access: ftp://ftpserver.myclearwater.com./ user: vendor pass: Clearwater Folder called: King_Eng. Let me know if you need anything else. Thank you, JOrMWWffMffIS : . ysTe Pricgramwim I CIS Info r-nuti on Technology 727.%2-4,842 1 -a a e arwa ter • • Well-4, Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:09 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Attachments: Zoning Map.doc Do you have a contact name and phone number / email for someone in your Information Technology Department? They should be able to help us get the files necessary for mapping and updating Sheet 1. When we call the number for the Information Technology Department on the website is just goes to voice mail, and has done this for more than a week. Any info would be a big help. <Wayne.W e1Is@myC 1earwater.com> 01/05/2010 10:03 AM To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): I'm sorry. My computer literacy is not so good in this area. Our Community Development Code is at www.MuiiiCode.com. If you just need to know the zoning of the property, the overall property is zoned Residential%OfficeiRetai.l (.R/O/R), Residential/Office General (RiOG) and Preservation (P). I am. attaching a Zoning Map for this property that will show where the zoning lines are on each side of Park Place Blvd., if this helps. From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:55 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Digital files for use in our CADD and/or GIS software. It will provide the current zoning designations for Grand Reserve and the surrounding properties. If this is not required information, it may be easier to just remove the zoning info all together. Craig <W ayn e. W e1Is@ myC1ea rwater.com> 01/05/2010 09:51 AM I'm song, what is a shapefile? To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Chris R. Hutton Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve 0 0 Wayne - We are having trouble tracking down the most current shapefiles for the City of Clearwater zoning. Do you have a name and contact info that can help us out. Thanks for the help. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II K n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - MIAMI - AUSTIN - DALLAS 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V:813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 ??ww. KingEn2ineerin2.a,m <Wayne. Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 01/04/2010 10:11 AM cc: <fcollins@jmgrealty.com> Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - Thanks. Please submit 8 copies of the plans to the Building Department. Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne - We are working on getting up-to-date zoning shapefiles from the City of Clearwater so that we can update Page 1 of the Grand Reserve plans. We were unable to get this info last week. We will resubmit before Friday, January 8, as stated in your email below. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II Kim; Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - MIAMI - AUSTIN - DALLAS 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.King,E_n2ineerin2.com <Wayne. W ells@myClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com>, <Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com>, <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com>, 4 <Rick.A1bee01earwater.com>, <Robert. Teffl@MyClearwater. corn>, <fco*-jmgrealty.com> 12/24/2009 11:19 AM Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - This project was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on October 17, 2006, with two conditions. Condition #1 stated: "That, within 90 days of CDB approval, an application be submitted for building permits to construct handicap sidewalk access between building, common facilities and the public sidewalk within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way, in a location and manner acceptable to the Engineering and Planning Departments, including the submission of a tree survey to minimize tree impacts." , An application for a building permit was submitted January 18, 2007, in an attempt to comply with this time frame (BCP2007-01343). City reviews were performed in January and February, 2007. There was no additional activity on this building permit, even after being notified in January 2008. This building permit was voided March 4, 2008. A meeting was held April 5, 2008, to discuss the proposal. We have had additional meetings with meeting notes prepared and numerous emails. Finally, a new building permit application was submitted June 3, 2009: (BCP2009-06049). All City reviews were completed in June 2009. By letter dated November 19, 2009, the City notified you of no response or activity within the past five months since providing our comments to you and giving you 30 days to respond or the permit would be voided. You have now submitted on December 17, 2009, a letter of response, with no revised plans, to avoid this permit being voided by the City. The City does not review response letters without the associated revised plans; therefore, no letter of review of these responses will be provided. Please provide eight copies revised plans responding t_o our prior comments for review by the City by January 8, 2010. If you have questions regarding appropriate means of responding to the City comments previously provided, it is recommended to correspond and/or meet with the specific reviewer prior to the above deadline. Failure to do such will result in Code Compliance action for failure to comply with the approval granted by the CDB. Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 I • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:11 AM To: 'D.Craig Brashier' Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Craig - Thanks. Please submit 8 copies of the plans to the Building Department. Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: Re: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Wayne - We are working on getting up-to-date zoning shapefiles from the City of Clearwater so that we can update Page 1 of the Grand Reserve plans. We were unable to get this info last week. We will resubmit before Friday, January 8, as stated in your email below. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II K Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - MIAMI - AUSTIN - DALLAS 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com <W ayne. W el ls(amyC learwater. com> To: <CBrashiera kingengineering.com> 12/24/2009 11:19 AM cc: <Bennett.ElboCcilmvClearwater.com>, <Himanshu.Patni c(D.mvClearwater.com>, <Scott.Rice(a)mvClearwater.com>, <Rick.Albeea myClearwater.com>, <Robert.Tefftc(DMvClearwateccorn>, <fcollins a.imgrealtv.com> Subject: BCP2009-06049 - Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - This project was approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) on October 17, 2006, with two conditions. Condition #1 stated: "That, within 90 days of CDB approval, an application be submitted for building permits to construct handicap sidewalk access between building, common facilities and the public sidewalk within the Park Place Boulevard . right-of-way, in a location and ma0r acceptable to the Engineering and Oning Departments, including the submission of a tree survey to minimize tree impacts." An application for a building permit was submitted January 18, 2007, in an attempt to comply with this time frame (BCP2007-01343). City reviews were performed in January and February, 2007. There was no additional activity on this building permit, even after being notified in January 2008. This building permit was voided March 4, 2008. A meeting was held April 5, 2008, to discuss the proposal. We have had additional meetings with meeting notes prepared and numerous emails. Finally, a new building permit application was submitted June 3, 2009 (BCP2009-06049). All City reviews were completed in June 2009. By letter dated November 19, 2009, the City notified you of no response or activity within the past five months since providing our comments to you and giving you 30 days to respond or the permit would be voided. You have now submitted on December 17, 2009, a letter of response, with no revised plans, to avoid this permit being voided by the City. The City does not review response letters without the associated revised, plans; therefore, no letter of review of these responses will be provided. Please provide eight copies revised plans responding to our prior comments for review by the City by January 8, 2010. If you have questions regarding appropriate means of responding to the City comments previously provided, it is recommended to correspond and/or meet with the specific reviewer prior to the above deadline. Failure to do such will result in Code Compliance action for failure to comply with the approval granted by the CDB. Wayne M. Wells, A/CP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 11:15 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Patni, Himanshu; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: Re: Revised Site Plan for Grand Reserve Wayne - Construction plans for the improvements are being finalized this week. Building permit application should be submitted shortly after. Craig Brashier KEA <W ayne.Well s@myClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com>, <Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com>, 05/11/2009 11:03 AM <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com>, <Rick.Albee@myClearwater.com> Subject: Revised Site Plan for Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - I was reminded today by a question regarding the sidewalks for this project and I am unclear what the status is of these required improvements. By email dated February 20, 2009, we approved the revised plans and directed you to now apply for a building permit to construct the improvements (see attached email). Could you let me know when an application will be submitted for a building permit and when actual construction will occur? Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 Phone: 727-562-4504 Fax: 727-562-4865 <<Craig Brashier - Approval of revised plans 2.20.09.htm>> 5/11/2009 Page 1 of 8 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 11:06 AM To: 'D.Craig Brashier' Cc: Elbo, Bennett; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Patni, Himanshu; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plan for Grand Reserve Craig - We have reviewed your responses and find them acceptable. Your next step is to apply for the building permit to construct the improvements. Plans need to show what areas are being restriped with all necessary dimensions. Please revise the plans to reflect my comments under Comments 5i and 5n. Make sure the revised plans indicate the number of parking spaces provided per side of the street and an overall total number of parking spaces. Additionally, ensure the plans address any requirements and concerns of Rick Albee regarding trees impacted by the proposed construction. Whatever you can do to submit the revised plans as soon as possible is appreciated. I would like to see this project completed soon (building permit submitted, reviewed and issued and then construction completed and inspected), since this is way past the deadlines contained in the Development Order issued in 2006. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 9:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Patni, Himanshu; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plan for Grand Reserve Wayne - My responses to your comments are provided below in red. Let me know if you have any questions about these responses. Please let me know when you are available to discuss the submittal requirements for the building permit application. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II King Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEnginp2qqnA.com 2/20/2009 Page 2 of 8 <W ayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> To: <CBrash ier@kingengineering.com> cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com>, <cbrownthurma n@comcast. net>, 02/13/2009 11:43 AM <fcollins@jmgrealty.com>, <Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com>, <Rick.Albee@myClearwater.corr <Scott. Rice@ myClearwater.com> Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - I have re-reviewed the original approved plan and calculations, as well as the revised plans you have submitted, and offer the following comments: 1. The original approval indicated a parking ratio of 1.77 spaces per dwelling unit and a total number of parking spaces provided of 693 spaces. 2. You are correct as to the error in calculating required parking. The calculation of 1.77 x 390 units = 690 spaces. I have conferred with my director, Michael Delk, and we will utilize the parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit as the basis of review for these revised plans, such that we cannot go below 690 parking spaces to accommodate the handicap accessibility improvements. 3. In re-reviewing the original approved plans, the parking count indicates 263 parking spaces on the east side of Park Place Blvd. and 431 parking spaces on the west side of Park Place Blvd., for a total number of parking spaces of 694 (not the 693 spaces as previously indicated). Agreed. 4. In reviewing your plans submitted January 27, 2009, 1 count 263 parking spaces on the east side of Park Place Blvd. and 428 parking spaces on the west side of Park Place Blvd., for a total number of parking spaces of 691, which exceeds the minimum of 690 spaces indicated in #2 above, subject to the information below. Your comment in 5.f is correct and this row actually contains 7 spaces. This has been revised. Therefore we have 692 spaces. 5. In order to achieve the handicap accessibility improvements indicated on the January 27, 2009, plans, the following changes to the original approved plans include or need to reflect updated information: a. To the south of Building 1 adjacent to the tennis courts the original plans had 12 parking space in a row and the revision to add a handicap space reduces the number of spaces in the row to 11 spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12- foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). Correct b. To the southwest of the clubhouse on the west side of Park Place Blvd, the original and revised plans indicate only three parking spaces, yet there are actually four parking spaces, including two handicap spaces. All four spaces have been counted. Row count number has been revised to shoe- 4 spaces. Only one space is labeled as a handicap space. c. To the west of Building 1 a parking row is indicated to have 12 spaces, yet there are 18 spaces in that row. This has been revised to correctly reflect 1.8 spaces d. To the west of Building 2 there are two parking spaces in a row to the north of the car wash area not indicated with a row count. 2/20/2009 C7 Page 3 of 8 0 A row count has been added to the plan. These spaces were counted in. our totals. e. To the east of Building 3, the handicap space and regular space in a two-space row are being swapped in their location. Correct f. To the northeast of Building 4, the original plans indicated seven parking spaces in the row adjacent to the building and the revised plans now indicate six spaces in the same parking row. 7 spaces is the correct number of existing spaces in this .row. We have revised the plan to indicate the correct number of spaces. g. To the northeast of Building 5, the original plans indicated six parking spaces in the row adjacent to the building and with the revised plans one parking space is being lost to provide for an accessible route, reducing the number of parking spaces in that row to five spaces. Correct h. To the southeast of Building 6 and across from Building 7, a handicap parking space is being relocated to the west side of that parking row of 24 spaces to provide handicap accessibility to Building 6. Correct i. It is noted that at Buildings 1 - 9 the original plans indicated six parking spaces for each building in the garages. Parking outside of these garages that are part of the residential buildings was not being counted as required parking since it was tandem parking. The revised plans now indicate only five parking spaces for each building. In discussing this issue with Himanshu Patni, the handicap accessible path being provided to each building would not preclude each garage from being counted as a parking space. Therefore, each building should be shown with six spaces representing the garage parking spaces. The count numbers on the plan indicate the tandem parking. Each building is labeled as having a 6 car garage. We will revise the numbers to reflect the number of garage spaces if required by city staff. j. To the southeast of Building 12 a handicap parking space is being added to the original five parking space row, thereby reducing the parking row to four parking spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12-foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). Correct. k. To the southwest of Building 12 a handicap parking space was originally indicated on the eastern side of the parking row of 16 spaces. The revised plan has removed this handicap parking space and replaced it with two parking spaces, now indicating 17 spaces in this parking row. This is a concern as the handicap space is normally 17 feet in width (12-foot wide plus a five-foot walk aisle). Two parking spaces would need 18 feet. It is unclear how this revision for this parking row is being accomplished, given a one-foot discrepancy. The entire row can be restriped and the 1.2 inches can be redistributed among the 1.7 spaces, essentially making each space 9' wide (8'11.3"). 1. To the northeast of Building 13 a handicap parking space is being added to the original five parking space row, thereby reducing the parking row to four parking spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12-foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). Correct m. To the northwest of Building 13 a handicap parking space was originally indicated on the eastern side of the parking row of 17 spaces. The revised plan has removed this handicap parking space and replaced it with two parking spaces, now indicating 18 spaces in this parking row. This is a concern as the handicap space is normally 17 feet in width (12-foot wide plus a five-foot walk aisle). Two parking spaces would need 18 feet. It is unclear how this revision for this parking row is being accomplished, given a one-foot discrepancy. The entire row can be restriped and the 12 inches can be redistributed among the 18 spaces, essentially making each space 9' wide (8'11.3"). n. It is noted that at Buildings 10 - 15 the original plans indicated six parking spaces for each building in the garages. Parking outside of these garages that are part of the residential buildings 2/20/2009 • C? Page 4 of 8 was not being counted as required parking since it was tandem parking. The revised plans now indicate only five parking spaces for each building. In discussing this issue with Himanshu Patni, the handicap accessible path being provided to each building would not preclude each garage from being counted as a parking space. Therefore, each building should be shown with six spaces representing the garage parking spaces. The count numbers on. the plan indicate the tandem. parking. Each. building is labeled as having a 6 car garage. We will. revise the numbers to reflect the number of garage spaces if required by city staff. It is unclear, given the above, how many parking spaces can actually be provided on the revised plans, especially in light of "k" and "m" above. This is especially a concern in regard to the required 690 parking spaces needed to stay within the parking space ratio calculation. We need to resolve these issues prior to submitting construction plans for a building permit. The corrections to the number of spaces indicated above need to be shown on revised plans. The reason for providing the revised plans at this point was to determine if and how handicap accessibility can be provided, as originally required under the Development Order, meeting all Code requirements. Once these issues can be successfully resolved, including any tree issues with Rick Albee, construction site plans with any necessary details need to be submitted to our Development Services. Department for a building permit. Eight site plan sets need to be submitted for review with the building permit application, along with required review fees. Let me know your thoughts once you have reviewed the above information. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 10:13 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Wayne - It appears we have reached agreement on all issues except the number of required parking spaces. The proposed improvements reduce the number of regular parking spaces and attached garage spaces to 692. This does not count the additional 23 detached garage spaces or the 75 tandem spaces behind the attached garages. As stated below, I believe there may have been a mistake made in the 693 total identified in the Development Order. The D.O. requires 1.77 spaces per unit. With 390 units the total number of spaces should be 690.3 not 693. Please provide your input on this issue so that we can finalize and resubmit the revised site plans. One of your previous emails also mentioned the need for construction drawings. Please provide additional information about the construction drawings you are requesting. Should we submit the building permit first and then provide the requested construction drawings as part of the review process? Thanks for your help and we look forward to hearing back from you. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II K n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 2/20/2009 Page 5 of 8 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com <H i man sh u. Patn i@MyClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com>, <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, 02/06/2009 08:43 AM <fcollins@jmgrealty.com>, <cbrownthurman@comcast.net> Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig, This would be Wayne's call regarding the number of parking spaces. I would personally be against the removal of the additional handicap parking space at Bldn. #15 since the section of the Fair Housing Act that we are applying requires a handicap parking space for the building to connect common use facilities by driving. I also feel it isn't a good idea to leave one building without a handicap parking space when every other building has one. If there is a way to safely connect another handicap parking space & access aisle to Building #15 then we would accept that. I'll let Wayne comment on the parking spaces and check with his management to determine if there would be an issue with losing one regular space to a handicap parking space. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:59 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Wells, Wayne; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Himanshu - Any thoughts yet on our suggested approaches for addressing the parking issue? Craig Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 02/05/2009 04:56 PM D.Craig Brashier To: <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> cc: Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com, CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com, 02/04/2009 fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net 02:13 PM Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand ReserveLink Project(s): 4391-000-000 By losing the one parking space we reduce our total number of spots to 692. This total includes regular parking spaces and 6 garage spaces for each building. This does not include the detached garages or the tandem parking spaces behind the garages in each building. To address this issue I 2/20/2009 0 • offer two approaches: Page 6 of 8 1 - I believe there may be an error in the Development Order relating to the number of spaces required. The Development Order permits a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit. For 390 residential units the 1.77 ratio would require 690.3 spaces, not 693 parking spaces (1.77 x 390). Therefore the 692 spaces meets this requirement. 2 - If it is determined that we need 693 spaces, then I suggest we remove the handicapped space at Building 15 since there was not one there to begin with and we already provide more handicapped spaces than is required. This will allow us to gain one additional space and achieve the 693. Please let us know which approach you prefer to deal with this issue. Let me know if you have any questions. Craig KEA <H imansh u. Patn i@MyClearwater.com> To: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, <CBra'shier@kingengineering.com> 02/04/2009 08:40 AM cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig, As discussed yesterday only one regular parking space is being lost by Building #5 where striping is being added to connect two walkways. Does this reduce the number below 693? Thanks, Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:34 PM To: 'CBrashier@kingengineering.com' Cc: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Craig - I don't have any issues with the revised plans, subject to the following: 1. The plans are acceptable to Traffic Engineering; 2. The plans are acceptable to Rick Albee regarding impacts on trees; and 3. Provided parking is not reduced below 693 parking spaces, as approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) under FLD2006-05029. Provided parking cannot count parking within detached garages (where behind open, surface parking) and in front of garages at the attached dwelling buildings (see attached Staff Report and Development Order for FLD2006-05029). I appreciate your efforts to get to this point, but I must reiterate that application for the required building permits needs to occur soon, as we are about two years late for these improvements. Eight copies of site plans, including site data of provided parking, and construction details need to 2/20/2009 • • Page 7 of 8 be submitted for the building permits. Pursuit of the building permit(s) needs to also occur quickly, as well as once the permits are issued, construction of the improvements. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FW: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve FYI -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:11 PM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve ---- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 01127/2009 05:09 PM --- D.Craig Brashier To: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com, Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com 01/27/2009 05:09 PM cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): 4391-000-000 Himanshu - I have attached the revised site plan for Grand Reserve. Please review and let me know if you have any comments or questions. Talk with you soon. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 2/20/2009 Pagel of 8 Wells, Wayne From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 8:44 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Elbo, Bennett Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Revised Site Plan for Grand Reserve Since we are working with an existing site with space constraints I am willing to accept a few spaces that are 8' 11.3" wide. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:53 PM To: Elbo, Bennett; Patni, Himanshu Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plan for Grand Reserve Bennett/Himanshu - Do you have any concerns regarding Craig's response to Comments 5k and 5m (spaces being 8'- 11.3")? I agree with his comments otherwise. I will want Craig to revise the plan to reflect my comments under Comments 5i and 5n. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 9:36 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Patni, Himanshu; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plan for Grand Reserve Wayne - My responses to your comments are provided below in red. Let me know if you have any questions about these responses. Please let me know when you are available to discuss the submittal requirements for the building permit application. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 2/20/2009 Page 2 of 8 0 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com <Wayne.WeIIs@myCIearwater.com> To: <C13rashier@kingengineering.corn> cc: <8ennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com>, <cbrownthurman@comcast.net>, 02/13/2009 11:43 AM <fcollins@jmgrealty.com>, <Himanshu.Patni@myCleanvater.com>, <Rick.Albee@myClearwater.con <Scott. Rice@ myClearwater.com> Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig - I have re-reviewed the original approved plan and calculations, as well as the revised plans you have submitted, and offer the following comments: 1. The original approval indicated a parking ratio of 1.77 spaces per dwelling unit and a total number of parking spaces provided of 693 spaces. 2. You are correct as to the error in calculating required parking. The calculation of 1.77 x 390 units = 690 spaces. I have conferred with my director, Michael Delk, and we will utilize the parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit as the basis of review for these revised plans, such that we cannot go below 690 parking spaces to accommodate the handicap accessibility improvements. 3. In re-reviewing the original approved plans, the parking count indicates 263 parking spaces on the east side of Park Place Blvd. and 431 parking spaces on the west side of Park Place Blvd., for a total number of parking spaces of 694 (not the 693 spaces as previously indicated). Agreed. 4. In reviewing your plans submitted January 27, 2009, 1 count 263 parking spaces on the east side of Park Place Blvd. and 428 parking spaces on the west side of Park Place Blvd., for a total number of parking spaces of 691, which exceeds the minimum of 690 spaces indicated in #2 above, subject to the information below. Your comment in 5.f is correct and this row actually contains 7 spaces. This has been revised. Therefore we have 692 spaces. 5. In order to achieve the handicap accessibility improvements indicated on the January 27, 2009, plans, the following changes to the original approved plans include or need to reflect updated information: a. To the south of Building 1 adjacent to the tennis courts the original plans had 12 parking space in a row and the revision to add a handicap space reduces the number of spaces in the row to 11 spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12- foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). Correct b. To the southwest of the clubhouse on the west side of Park Place Blvd, the original and revised plans indicate only three parking spaces, yet there are actually four parking spaces, including two handicap spaces. All four spaces have been counted. Row count number has been revised to show 4 spaces. 2/20/2009 Page 3 of 8 Only one space is labeled as a handicap space. c. To the west of Building 1 a parking row is indicated to have 12 spaces, yet there are 18 spaces in that row. This has been revised to correctly reflect 18 spaces d. To the west of Building 2 there are two parking spaces in a row to the north of the car wash area not indicated with a row count. A row count has been added to the plan. These spaces were counted in our totals. e. To the east of Building 3, the handicap space and regular space in a two-space row are being swapped in their location. Correct f. To the northeast of Building 4, the original plans indicated seven parking spaces in the row adjacent to the building and the revised plans now indicate six spaces in the same parking row. 7 spaces is the correct number of existing spaces in this row. We have revised the plan to indicate the correct number of spaces. g. To the northeast of Building 5, the original plans indicated six parking spaces in the row adjacent to the building and with the revised plans one parking space is being lost to provide for an accessible route, reducing the number of parking spaces in that row to five spaces. Correct h. To the southeast of Building 6 and across from Building 7, a handicap parking space is being relocated to the west side of that parking row of 24 spaces to provide handicap accessibility to Building 6. Correct i. It is noted that at Buildings 1 - 9 the original plans indicated six parking spaces for each building in the garages. Parking outside of these garages that are part of the residential buildings was not being counted as required parking since it was tandem parking. The revised plans now indicate only five parking spaces for each building. In discussing this issue with Himanshu Patni, the handicap accessible path being provided to each building would not preclude each garage from being counted as a parking space. Therefore, each building should be shown with six spaces representing the garage parking spaces. The count numbers on the plan indicate the tandem parking. Each building is labeled as having a 6 car garage. We will revise the numbers to reflect the number of garage spaces if required by city staff. j. To the southeast of Building 12 a handicap parking space is being added to the original five parking space row, thereby reducing the parking row to four parking spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12-foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). Correct k. To the southwest of Building 12 a handicap parking space was originally indicated on the eastern side of the parking row of 16 spaces. The revised plan has removed this handicap parking space and replaced it with two parking spaces, now indicating 17 spaces in this parking row. This is a concern as the handicap space is normally 17 feet in width (12-foot wide plus a five-foot walk aisle). Two parking spaces would need 18 feet. It is unclear how this revision for this parking row is being accomplished, given a one-foot discrepancy. The entire row can be restriped and the 12 inches can be redistributed among the 17 spaces, essentially making each space 9' wide (8'1.1.3"). 1. To the northeast of Building 13 a handicap parking space is being added to the original five parking space row, thereby reducing the parking row to four parking spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12-foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). Correct m. To the northwest of Building 13 a handicap parking space was originally indicated on the eastern side of the parking row of 17 spaces. The revised plan has removed this handicap parking space and replaced it with two parking spaces, now indicating 18 spaces in this parking row. This is a concern as the handicap space is normally 17 feet in width (12-foot wide plus a five-foot walk aisle). 2/20/2009 Page 4 of 8 Two parking spaces would need 18 feet. It is unclear how this revision for this parking row is being accomplished, given a one-foot discrepancy. The entire row can be restriped and the 12 inches can be redistributed among the 18 spaces, essentially making each space 9' wide (8'11.3"). n. It is noted that at Buildings 10 - 15 the original plans indicated six parking spaces for each building in the garages. Parking outside of these garages that are part of the residential buildings was not being counted as required parking since it was tandem parking. The revised plans now indicate only five parking spaces for each building. In discussing this issue with Himanshu Patni, the handicap accessible path being provided to each building would not preclude each garage from being counted as a parking space. Therefore, each building should be shown with six spaces representing the garage parking spaces. The count numbers on the plan indicate the tandem parking. Each building is labeled as having a 6 car garage. We will revise the numbers to reflect the number of garage spaces if required by city staff. It is unclear, given the above, how many parking spaces can actually be provided on the revised plans, especially in light of "k" and "m" above. This is especially a concern in regard to the required 690 parking spaces needed to stay within the parking space ratio calculation. We need to resolve these issues prior to submitting construction plans for a building permit. The corrections to the number of spaces indicated above need to be shown on revised plans. The reason for providing the revised plans at this point was to determine if and how handicap accessibility can be provided, as originally required under the Development Order, meeting all Code requirements. Once these issues can be successfully resolved, including any tree issues with Rick Albee, construction site plans with any necessary details need to be submitted to our Development Services Department for a building permit. Eight site plan sets need to be submitted for review with the building permit application, along with required review fees. Let me know your thoughts once you have reviewed the above information. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 10:13 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Wayne - It appears we have reached agreement on all issues except the number of required parking spaces. The proposed improvements reduce the number of regular parking spaces and attached garage spaces to 692. This does not count the additional 23 detached garage spaces or the 75 tandem spaces behind the attached garages. As stated below, I believe there may have been a mistake made in the 693 total identified in the Development Order. The D.O. requires 1.77 spaces per unit. With 390 units the total number of spaces should be 690.3 not 693. Please provide your input on this issue so. that we can finalize and resubmit the revised site plans. One of your previous emails also mentioned the need for construction drawings. Please provide additional information about the construction drawings you are requesting. Should we submit the building permit first and then provide the requested construction drawings as part of the review process? Thanks for your help and we look forward to hearing back from you. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II 2/20/2009 • n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> 0 Page 5 of 8 To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com>, <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, 02/06/2009 08:43 AM <fcollins@jmgrealty.com>, <cbrownthurman@comcast.net> Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig, This would be Wayne's call regarding the number of parking spaces. I would personally be against the removal of the additional handicap parking space at Bldn. #15 since the section of the Fair Housing Act that we are applying requires a handicap parking space for the building to connect common use facilities by driving. I also feel it isn't a good idea to leave one building without a handicap parking space when every other building has one. If there is a way to safely connect another handicap parking space & access aisle to Building #15 then we would accept that. I'll let Wayne comment on the parking spaces and check with his management to determine if there would be an issue with losing one regular space to a handicap parking space. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent:. Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:59 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Wells, Wayne; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Himanshu - Any thoughts yet on our suggested approaches for addressing the parking issue? Craig --- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 02/05/2009 04:56 PM -- D.Craig Brashier To: <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> cc: Bennett. Elbo@myClearwater.com, CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com, 02/04/2009 fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net 02:13 PM Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand ReserveLink Project(s): 4391-000-000 2/20/2009 Page 6 of 8 0 0 By losing the one parking space we reduce our total number of spots to 692. This total includes regular parking spaces and 6 garage spaces for each building. This does not include the detached garages or the tandem parking spaces behind the garages in each building. To address this issue I offer two approaches: 1 - I believe there may be an error in the Development Order relating to the number of spaces required. The Development Order permits a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit. For 390 residential units the 1.77 ratio would require 690.3 spaces, not 693 parking spaces (1.77 x 390). Therefore the 692 spaces meets this requirement. 2 - If it is determined that we need 693 spaces, then I suggest we remove the handicapped space at Building 15 since there was not one there to begin with and we already provide more handicapped spaces. than is required. This will allow us to gain one additional space and achieve the 693. Please let us know which approach you prefer to deal with this issue. Let me know if you have any questions. Craig KEA <H imansh u. Patni@MyClea rwater.com> To: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 02/04/2009 08:40 AM cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig, As discussed yesterday only one regular parking space is being lost by Building #5 where striping is being added to connect two walkways. Does this reduce the number below 693? Thanks, Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:34 PM To: 'CBrashier@kingengineering.com' Cc: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Craig - I don't have any issues with the revised plans, subject to the following: 1. The plans are acceptable to Traffic Engineering; 2. The plans are acceptable to Rick Albee regarding impacts on trees; and 3. Provided parking is not reduced below 693 parking spaces, as approved by the Community 2/20/2009 Page 7 of 8 40 0 Development Board (CDB) under FLD2006-05029. Provided parking cannot count parking within detached garages (where behind open, surface parking) and in front of garages at the attached dwelling buildings (see attached Staff Report and Development Order for FLD2006-05029). I appreciate your efforts to get to this point, but I must reiterate that application for the required building permits needs to occur soon, as we are about two years late for these improvements. Eight copies of site plans, including site data of provided parking, and construction details need to be submitted for the building permits. Pursuit of the building permit(s) needs to also occur quickly, as well as once the permits are issued, construction of the improvements. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FW: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve FYI -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:11 PM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve ----- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 01/27/2009 05:09 PM --- D.Craig Brashier To: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com, Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com 01/27/2009 05:09 PM cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): 4391-000-000 Himanshu - I have attached the revised site plan for Grand Reserve. Please review and let me know if you have any comments or questions. Talk with you soon. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 2/20/2009 Page 8 of 8 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 2/20/2009 • 0 Page 1 of 6 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 11:44 AM To: 'D.Craig Brashier' Cc:. Elbo, Bennett; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Patni, Himanshu; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Craig - I have re-reviewed the original approved plan and calculations, as well as the revised plans you have submitted, and offer the following comments: 1. The original approval indicated a parking ratio of 1.77 spaces per dwelling unit and a total number of parking spaces provided of 693 spaces. 2. You are correct as to the error in calculating required parking. The calculation of 1.77 x 390 units = 690 spaces. I have conferred with my director, Michael Delk, and we will utilize the parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit as the basis of review for these revised plans, such that we cannot go below 690 parking spaces to accommodate the handicap accessibility improvements. 3. In re-reviewing the original approved plans, the parking count indicates 263 parking spaces on the east side of Park Place Blvd. and 431 parking spaces on the west side of Park Place Blvd., for a total number of parking spaces of 694 (not the 693 spaces as previously indicated). 4. In reviewing your plans submitted January 27, 2009, 1 count 263 parking spaces on the east side of Park Place Blvd. and 428 parking spaces on the west side of Park Place Blvd., for a total number of parking spaces of 691, which exceeds the minimum of 690 spaces indicated in #2 above, subject to the information below. 5. In order to achieve the handicap accessibility improvements indicated on the January 27, 2009, plans, the following changes to the original approved plans include or need to reflect updated information: a. To the south of Building 1 adjacent to the tennis courts the original plans had 12 parking space in a row and the revision to add a handicap space reduces the number of spaces in the row to 11 spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12-foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). b. To the southwest of the clubhouse on the west side of Park Place Blvd, the original and revised plans indicate only three parking spaces, yet there are actually four parking spaces, including two handicap spaces. c. To the west of Building 1 a parking row is indicated to have 12 spaces, yet there are 18 spaces in that row. d. To the west of Building 2 there are two parking spaces in a row to the north of the car wash area not indicated with a row count. e. To the east of Building 3, the handicap space and regular space in a two-space row are being swapped in their location. f. To the northeast of Building 4, the original plans indicated seven parking spaces in the row adjacent to the building and the revised plans now indicate six spaces in the same parking row. g. To the northeast of Building 5, the original plans indicated six parking spaces in the row adjacent to the building and with the revised plans one parking space is being lost to provide for an accessible route, reducing the number 2/13/2009 Page 2 of 6 0 of parking spaces in that row to five spaces. h. To the southeast of Building 6 and across from Building 7, a handicap parking space is being relocated to the west side of that parking row of 24 spaces to provide handicap accessibility to Building 6. i. It is noted that at Buildings 1 - 9 the original plans indicated six parking spaces for each building in the garages. Parking outside of these garages that are part of the residential buildings was not being counted as required parking since it was tandem parking. The revised plans now indicate only five parking spaces for each building. In discussing this issue with Himanshu Patni, the handicap accessible path being provided to each building would not preclude each garage from being counted as a parking space. Therefore, each building should be shown with six spaces representing the garage parking spaces. j. To the southeast of Building 12 a handicap parking space is being added to the original five parking space row, thereby reducing the parking row to four parking spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12-foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). k. To the southwest of Building 12 a handicap parking space was originally indicated on the eastern side of the parking row of 16 spaces. The revised plan has removed this handicap parking space and replaced it with two parking spaces, now indicating 17 spaces in this parking row. This is a concern as the handicap space is normally 17 feet in width (12-foot wide plus a five-foot walk aisle). Two parking spaces would need 18 feet. It is unclear how this revision for this parking row is being accomplished, given a one-foot discrepancy. 1. To the northeast of Building 13 a handicap parking space is being added to the original five parking space row, thereby reducing the parking row to four parking spaces. It is assumed that taking the two spaces (total of 18 feet in width) being used to provide the one handicap space that the walk aisle for the handicap space will be six-feet in width plus the 12-foot wide space to equal the existing 18 feet (walk aisle is normally a minimum of five feet in width). m. To the northwest of Building 13 a handicap parking space was originally indicated on the eastern side of the parking row of 17 spaces. The revised plan has removed this handicap parking space and replaced it with two parking spaces, now indicating 18 spaces in this parking row. This is a concern as the handicap space is normally 17 feet in width (12-foot wide plus a five-foot walk aisle). Two parking spaces would need 18 feet. It is unclear how this revision for this parking row is being accomplished, given a one-foot discrepancy. n. It is noted that at Buildings 10 - 15 the original plans indicated six parking spaces for each building in the garages. Parking outside of these garages that are part of the residential buildings was not being counted as required parking since it was tandem parking. The revised plans now indicate only five parking spaces for each building. In discussing this issue with Himanshu Patni, the handicap accessible path being provided to each building would not preclude each garage from being counted as a parking space. Therefore, each building should be shown with six spaces representing the garage parking spaces. It is unclear, given the above, how many parking spaces can actually be provided on the revised plans, especially in light of "k" and "m" above. This is especially a concern in regard to the required 690 parking spaces needed to stay within the parking space ratio calculation. We need to resolve these issues prior to submitting construction plans for a building permit. The corrections to the number of spaces indicated above need to be shown on revised plans. The reason for providing the revised plans at this point was to determine if and how handicap accessibility can be provided, as originally required under the Development Order, meeting all Code requirements. Once these issues can be successfully resolved, including any tree issues with Rick Albee, construction site plans with any necessary details need to be submitted to our Development Services Department for a building permit. Eight site plan sets need to be submitted for review with the building permit application, along with required review fees. Let me know your thoughts once you have reviewed the above information. Wayne 2/13/2009 • • -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 10:13 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Wayne - Page 3 of 6 It appears we have reached agreement on all issues except the number of required parking spaces. The proposed improvements reduce the number of regular parking spaces and attached garage spaces to 692. This does not count the additional 23 detached garage spaces or the 75 tandem spaces behind the attached garages. As stated below, I believe there may have been a mistake made in the 693 total identified in the Development Order. The D.O. requires 1.77 spaces per unit. With 390 units the total number of spaces should be 690.3 not 693. Please provide your input on this issue so that we can finalize and resubmit the revised site plans. One of your previous emails also mentioned the need for construction drawings. Please provide additional information about the construction drawings you are requesting. Should we submit the building permit first and then provide the requested construction drawings as part of the review process? Thanks for your help and we look forward to hearing back from you. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineednq.com <H imansh u. Patni@MyClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com>, <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, 02/06/2009 08:43 AM <fcollins@jmgrealty.com>, <cbrownthurman@comcast.net> Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): Craig, This would be Wayne's call regarding the number of parking spaces. I would personally be against the removal of the additional handicap parking space at Bldn. #15 since the section of the Fair Housing Act that we are applying requires a handicap parking space for the building to connect common use facilities by driving. I also feel it isn't a good idea to leave one building without a handicap parking space when every other building has one. If there is a way to safely connect another handicap parking space & access aisle to Building #15 then we would accept that. 2/13/2009 0 0 Page 4 of 6 I'll let Wayne comment on the parking spaces and check with his management to determine if there would be an issue with losing one regular space to a handicap parking space. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:59 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Wells, Wayne; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Himanshu - Any thoughts yet on our suggested approaches for addressing the parking issue? Craig ---- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 02/05/2009 04:56 PM --- D.Craig Brashier To: <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> cc: Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com, CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com, 02/04/2009 fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net 02:13 PM Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand ReserveLtnk Project(s): 4391-000-000 By losing the one parking space we reduce our total number of spots to 692. This total includes regular parking spaces and 6 garage spaces for each building. This does not include the detached garages or the tandem parking spaces behind the garages in each building. To address this issue I offer two approaches: 1 - I believe there may be an error in the Development Order relating to the number of spaces required. The Development Order permits a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit. For 390 residential units the 1.77 ratio would require 690.3 spaces, not 693 parking spaces (1.77 x 390). Therefore the 692 spaces meets this requirement. 2 - If it is determined that we need 693 spaces, then I suggest we remove the handicapped space at Building 15 since there was not one there to begin with and we already provide more handicapped spaces than is required. This will allow us to gain one additional space and achieve the 693. Please let us know which approach you prefer to deal with this issue. Let me know if you have any questions. Craig KEA <Himanshu. Patn i@MyC learwater.com> To: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 02/04/2009 08:40 AM cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): 2/13/2009 • ? Page 5 of 6 Craig, As discussed yesterday only one regular parking space is being lost by Building #5 where striping is being added to connect two walkways. Does this reduce the number below 693? Thanks, Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:34 PM To: 'CBrashier@kingengineering.com' Cc: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Craig - I don't have any issues with the revised plans, subject to the following: 1. The plans are acceptable to Traffic Engineering; 2. The plans are acceptable to Rick Albee regarding impacts on trees; and 3. Provided parking is not reduced below 693 parking spaces, as approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) under FLD2006-05029. Provided parking cannot count parking within detached garages (where behind open, surface parking) and in front of garages at the attached dwelling buildings (see attached Staff Report and Development Order for FLD2006-05029). I appreciate your efforts to get to this point, but I must reiterate that application for the required building permits needs to occur soon, as we are about two years late for these improvements. Eight copies of site plans, including site data of provided parking, and construction details need to be submitted for the building permits. Pursuit of the building permit(s) needs to also occur quickly, as well as once the permits are issued, construction of the improvements. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FW: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve FYI -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:11 PM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve 2/13/2009 Page 6 of 6 r • • --- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 01/27/2009 05:09 PM -- D.Craig Brashier To: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com, Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com 01/27/2009 05:09 PM cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): 4391-000-000 Himanshu - I have attached the revised site plan for Grand Reserve. Please review and let me know if you have any comments or questions. Talk with you soon. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II King Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 2/13/2009 0 W4 iaaFnwe )LAM KING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, /NC. THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE LW/CAD Engineers Planners Surveyors Scientists - Landscape Architects FINAL SITE PLAN :,,6 WA - .OA-q .1 DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES LOT Z W4 ?IIr w'^'--." ? -- a.?+ A LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION No) ) M T- FL DSWF p", D [/-[Nln ® STORM SEWER INLET 111"p- SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE nAM EAN T IX. 6" Wu WATER MAIN c'o' -R'YY- NIA FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION (FOC) I mo/ F.1 I`FR fY F IRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (FHA) TOP OF BANK (TOO) - - ACOE JURISDICTION 1MITS (APP O IMATE? NIA NIA BUILDING NUMBER NIA NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES NIA INTERIOR LANDSCAPING l l NIA CONCRETE '. y T•t?1 NIA WETLAND FILL AREA I----------- • I ? _ `? N'6ULDRp SETBACK ri\ < P \ ?? \ \ \ M BLRDRW `H ?N LNK FENCF NG PAAKWG LABEL N' \ ^ 6• / 'i' TYPE C4AB EXISTING 6 STORY / OFFICE BUILDINGV'/ ' Y?6 ?yO HANDICAPPED 815N DETAIL 112-710 CURVE DATA CLINE RAOIU6 LENGTH TANGENT CHORD SEARING DELTA G 2000.00' 13.69 6.94' 13.69' NJOO'S6"E 00?3'32' C2 J66.00' 97.67 49.13 97.38 X286'03'E 139'34' t 0 23 so KIO SCALE. I" = 50** O3 UJ 1 Kr N02°04'59"E 03 l 4.23' L J N40°38'34"E 41.08' I f 1 I I I I I I 1 I JJG ? Pp LEFT TURN LA1F \`\ J i TJ / IL L --? I I 6' CONC. N 1 1 r (D) 3AR-0I (..) NAG, F 61636 TREE LEGEND Symm DESCRPTKIN BAY CHINA BERRY CITRUS DEAD WARE OAK PALM PINK UNKNOWN - - - - -JJAM2TQN?QA? (DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF I I I I I I I 1 L I I 5,3??"-C- ---? u Z 41182' a I I ? -- ?? u r- N72 25'38"E -1 z d 1.99' I H. ?=y I ?I ?? 6 I vw I 6 I I ? • )'44"E I BO' l I I II` 1 1 l I 1 ( ) ? n Y ? r\ r - ---- ---- 3 0 0 (/ 2,-7 ? 0 q 2•X 2` ALUM. POST EMBEDDED 60' (MIKI N0X ALNNUY GATE \? I r I .wo I J INTO W % 17' D CONCRETE NI PICKETS 1 4" O.C. qo/ .E. . FOOTNG 1 6'-0' O.C. ^ J INTO C I L---j I FU RE BUILDING NOn DECORATIVE FENCE I EXISTING LOT t o..Mkb. j BUILDING 8TORZ OPNTNALNIC6, INC. CURVE DATA ; PARK PLACE NANDIGAPPED STALL DETAIL N L[NGIN TANGENT ORD EEAAING D6iA LI 61a k51 71.21 ]6. SDI'414 W 0 48 3 c2 690. 100. SB]. 512'3 321506 60.21 570'N 14 W JI 0 W 26500 29a9/ 1 s 9-05-08 ADDED HANDICAP ACCESS PER qtt COWEN S 118 0-001-000 RWA KING ENGINEERING ASSOC/AYES INC. THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE 4 2-"-97 REVISED WATER MAIN k M01£D COMPACICR _ , FOR FINAL SITE PLAN 0-ie-98 MovrD BRICK COLUMN OUT OF EX. URUTY ESMT Engineer Planners Surveyor Scientists Landscape Architects DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES LOT 3 2 9-20-95 REV. PER. DRC COMMENTS & ADDED PARKING LOT w TM >mm 4am it "..z ml" a1 a x, se e411 Mwla..m .. ,1621 ? boa =%M" •„, ,? d LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION I 4-30-96 REV. PER. CITY DRC SITE PLAN RENEW 4-10-99 RwA 1W)1N-IIN TmK fL 61606 . Pxl kMMI. ti lIIW (W) m191 (M6) 110.0104 °• 1•=50' • u Wells, Wayne From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:00 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FW: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Ed RE: Revised Site Plans for ... -----Original Message----- From: cbrownthurman@comcast.net Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 To: Patni, Himanshu Cc: Fred Collins Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans [mailto:cbrownthurman@comcast.net] 10:56 AM for Grand Reserve Craig I'm not reading the "old" approval now but I seem to remember that parking compliance was also an issue back then . The city agreed to allow whatever was the exception issue back then in order to achieve ADA compliance / take a look at the approval back then to see if it applies to your discussion now (as a reminder to he city of their action then) Maybe my memory is faulty / Brown 770 394 1213 cbrownthurman@comcast.net -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> > Craig, > This would be Wayne's call regarding the number of parking spaces. I would > personally be against the removal of the additional handicap parking space at > Bldn. #15 since the section of the Fair Housing Act that we are applying > requires a handicap parking space for the building to connect common use > facilities by driving. I also feel it isn't a good idea to leave one building > without a handicap parking space when every other building has one. If there is > a way to safely connect another handicap parking space & access aisle to > Building #15 then we would accept that. > I'll let Wayne comment on the parking spaces and check with his management to > determine if there would be an issue with losing one regular space to a handicap > parking space. > Himanshu > -----Original Message----- > From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 4:59 PM > To: Patni, Himanshu > Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Wells, Wayne; > fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net > Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve 1 > Himanshu - > Any thoughts yet on our suggested approaches for addressing the parking issue? > Craig > ----- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 02/05/2009 04:56 PM ----- > D.Craig Brashier > 02/04/2009 02:13 PM > To: <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> > cc: Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com, CBrashier@kingengineering.com, > Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com, fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net > Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Link > <Notes:///8525715C005D9B26/DABA975B9FB113EB852564B5001283EA/A99B8F33BB64E5B48525 > 7553004B28A5> > Project(s): 4391-000-000 > By losing the one parking space we reduce our total number of spots to 692. > This total includes regular parking spaces and 6 garage spaces for each > building. This does not include the detached garages or the tandem parking > spaces behind the garages in each building. To address this issue I offer two > approaches: > 1 - I believe there may be an error in the Development Order relating to the > number of spaces required. The Development Order permits a parking ratio of > 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit. For 390 residential units the 1.77 ratio > would require 690.3 spaces, not 693 parking spaces (1.77 x 390). Therefore the > 692 spaces meets this requirement. > 2 - If it is determined that we need 693 spaces, then I suggest we remove the > handicapped space at Building 15 since there was not one there to begin with and > we already provide more handicapped spaces than is required. This will allow us > to gain one additional space and achieve the 693. > Please let us know which approach you prefer to deal with this issue. Let me > know if you have any questions. > Craig > KEA > <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> > 02/04/2009 08:40 AM > > To: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, > <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> > cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com> > Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve > Project(s): 2 > Craig, > As discussed yesterday only one regular parking space is > #5 where striping is being added to connect two walkways > number below 693? > Thanks, > Himanshu > -----Original Message----- > From: Wells, Wayne > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:34 PM > To: 'CBrashier@kingengineering.com' • being lost by Building Does this reduce the > Cc: Patni Himanshu• Elbo Bennett; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott > Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve > Craig - > I don't have any issues with the revised plans, subject to the following: > 1. The plans are acceptable to Traffic Engineering; > 2. The plans are acceptable to Rick Albee regarding impacts on trees; and > 3. Provided parking is not reduced below 693 parking spaces, as approved by the > Community Development Board (CDB) under FLD2006-05029. Provided parking cannot > count parking within detached garages (where behind open, surface parking) and > in front of garages at the attached dwelling buildings (see attached Staff > Report and Development Order for FLD2006-05029). > I appreciate your efforts to get to this point, but I must reiterate that > application for the required building permits needs to occur soon, as we are > about two years late for these improvements. Eight copies of site plans, > including site data of provided parking, and construction details need to be > submitted for the building permits. Pursuit of the building permit(s) needs to > also occur quickly, as well as once the permits are issued, construction of the > improvements. > Wayne > -----Original Message----- > From: Patni, Himanshu > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:10 PM > To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick > Cc: Rice, Scott > Subject: FW: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve > FYI > -----Original Message----- > From: D.Craig Brashier (mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com) > Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:11 PM > To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett > Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net > Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve > ----- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 01/27/2009 05:09 PM ----- > D.Craig Brashier > 01/27/2009 05:09 PM > To: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com, Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com > cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net > Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve 3 > Project(s): 43910-000 > Himanshu - > I have attached the revised site plan for Grand Reserve. > me know if you have any comments or questions. Talk with > D. Craig Brashier, AICP > Planner II > King > Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 > TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI > 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 > V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 > <http://www.kingengineering.com/> www.kingengineering.com • Please review and let you soon. 4 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:34 PM To: 'CBrashier@kingengineering.com' Cc: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Craig - I don't have any issues with the revised plans, subject to the following: Page 1 of 2 1. The plans are acceptable to Traffic Engineering; 2. The plans are acceptable to Rick Albee regarding impacts on trees; and 3. Provided parking is not reduced below 693 parking spaces, as approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) under FLD20G6-05029. Provided parking cannot count parking within detached garages (where behind open, surface parking) and in front of garages at the attached dwelling buildings (see attached Staff Report and Development Order for FLD2006-05029). appreciate your efforts to get to this point, but I must reiterate that application for the required building permits needs to occur soon, as we are about two years late for these improvements. Eight copies of site plans, including site data of provided parking, and construction details need to be submitted for the building permits. Pursuit of the building permit(s) needs to also occur quickly, as well as once the permits are issued, construction of the improvements. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:10 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: FW: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve FYI -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:11 PM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve --- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 01/27/2009 05:09 PM D.Craig Brashier To: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com, Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com 01/27/2009 05:09 PM cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): 4391-000-000 2/3/2009 Page 2 of 2 0 0 Himanshu - I have attached the revised site plan for Grand Reserve. Please review and let me know if you have any comments or questions. Talk with you soon. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II K Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 2/3/2009 Eb6TND ® STORM SEWER INLET vaeaosse F? Fx B' 3' SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 19AN EAN T C.O. WATER MAIN -S.wM- NIA FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION (FDC) FDC W " FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (FHA) 1-4 FMA TOP OF BANK (TOO) - - - ALOE JURISDICTION LIMITS (APPRO%IMATE) NIA NIA BUILDING NUMBER ®q NIA NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES NIA INTERIOR LANDSCAPING NIA CONCRETE NIA WETLAND FILL AREA ----, • TREE LEGEND SAY C BERRY VIRUS DEAD MYRTLE OAK PALM PDE OMMOWN ?-?? e' DLIDNM EETYCK H CA Hir LINK 1, MM AU1D118 BETS FENCE ` `\ NO PA0.NiNG UBEL \ 00, J \\ \/ rr Tr..p?w9e mm EXISTING 6 STORY / OFFICE BUILDING.," HANDICAPPED 616N DETAIL II I I / /Ir LEFT TUWN LANE J \ r I I ? I 1 // I Al r\ `1 L L,L ? I ? ? r caxc ; ? ? I 1 - I r TRACT I OF JJG "'" ."." KING ENG/NEERWO ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers Planners Surveyors Scientists Landscape Architects 4NM9 Nx • N -T W NwH. PM IIOY YuebYrlh ArY 1W FL PNRR ? 6Wr 4°9 Y fAN A-4 Im) IAVNW .n FL S3m9 ?-r °. aan.'ti. 4«w Inl sun jeDl PwASw HAIWf ROAD (DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE FOR DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES d LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CURVE DATA CURVE RADIUS LEND 7N TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA G 2000.00 IJ.B9' 6.94' 13.89' NJ09'36'E 0@3'92' G2 76!.00' 91.fi1' g9.13' 97.30' N22S'03•E 199'94 Z 0 25 !0 N0 SCALE. I" = 50' o N02°04'59"E 23' D 4 J ,z . J NAO°38'34"E ?- 41.06' z w I 1 I I -1 0 OD I I L ,w I I I 1 u 41182' O I i7Y O A J C N72125'38" -C ? 1 E -1 1 z` 1.99' h 1 1 0=Y LU C Ex I vM I ? Eu ° U) 12 I O J h D 1 S59°39-44-E 67.80' ff I I 1 } ? ?ID 00 \\ !?_ \ CO z ---------- FINAL FINAL SITE PLAN LOT 2 WATER STORAGE FACILITY F SEIB 589'54'49"W 50.00-'Y? -v . -l MML(3H - WALK-S C ATALI® YElE1EUL AAFA '( OSm or N EMM LINK F6AwE P.® ' , „ ' I RUNG SETBACK / 0 \ tElWMS mUMT ? „0. ?j ?'? CANT ZENIMS A. ?h MEEP EERrtLN 1 Pu kh ' r '14. 0 x U a WA LUNG ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE ® ceD u er?P= Engineers Planned Surryra Sltist6 Landscape Architect FOR FINAL SITE PLAN NN6 W N e or Ne c en Landscape DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES LOT 3 a In. MA a ee a .Aee ?«..+.. rLn2AAID ? MM. A00 I?I NN A2 t LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Teal TMAww TT- (A., 09 ?L,• r«I Wan. ti sAaA NAMRA APARTMENTS "ED LIGHT FIXIURE 7( W CU70FFS DREW - 19 ?- Z SHOPPING CENTER xo vARXMG lI&l Zff IN SI AL( WIIAECrro MPPNC fEfSOFMIFA PAM LOT a 25 50 100 P ETES M GAT6 SCALE: 1' 50' amx 1V wmNO SETBACK Fw 1E 1W D suNE1 CITY OF CLlARWATlR VACANT II D AGE SWNE 7•, NO PAXC U9 ? I I II ? e ~ PROPOSED 3 STORY roAEMAN ? I ? II PAOP05ED \\ gTDRMWATER, " --!' \ " '" 1D 23• IXlAplO sEtBAa ' S R .SUILOING 2 S MANAGEMENT ? II 6 CAR A C GE) 1 ? LDING klT RUI CAR AGt'?' &, w O r& e re•#00 ,«' .« 8 w r ?? ~ . l I III , u.. ` 6 ? •" II r I I ? .® ? "• II 1W IIiDSCIPE BUNFR No PARxxc u6a I . I ? if . II 8 - ° - -L n WAUwDT WN H MAwO qE AND 6 ' ' 41 # EIDLSm naors Wu BE sAw ? vroP MGM STOP BEM I a' TI id 11 14,1 ,. ?? Agr , , ' '°- I - EI f ar ? I roan (. PNE Tq¢s ? A ?' , • ° , ° 7U ®, X64 u? PRO T D rTORMWk YI g m e< E AMo ?P VC ? e 'v> } D Dy? 8®«. ®° ?? ? MG0 ? iA6r? a sriE $ 6' ?1 o '? AI " .„ . , , -yj o e , r„ '' TOT T • , I' ' B 0. II ° ' i N . _ M .... w .? J.. aRR d N *a Wry \ 8 j ?? l 3 a " ? '? * c?AdWr ?` n tuna tm: i ? III ix ? a f s 9-G1OB ADDED xAxDICAP ACCESS PEV aTY COMMENTS A 2---97 - REVISED WATER MAIN k NOVm COMPACTOR nao-oGl-aoo mAa -L 2 1 ID-18-96 9-20-96 4-30-96 MOVED BRCK COLUMN OUT OF EIC UTILITY ESMT REV. PER, DRC COMMENTS E ADDED PARKING LOT REV. PER CITY DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW m A-10-98 , r=sD' 3 A P ?? 8 ?' ? DES 8 PROPOSED 3 STORY 26 U T RSIV?qNG 6 GARAGE) 4 f r° .0? P RETAMMNC w - r NL aAICHEPE: ° trr " „ S °. O D[CORARv4 FIXMTAN N 1AnF 1 I PROPOSED T F ' r'STDRMWATER MANAGEMENT " SYSTEM / 100 s LAKES y « ° PRS03D anAa; Au L•nrrc ,En ° 0, 2, '?--- ------ 5100'03'49'T W -- 1 0.21 ---- ------- B s ?- -1`i--=='-- --------- - -------- v1oPOSD WALL 75 BUIIMlO SE16A0( uaMEM Jye '• ^kPwXNCUOe_? PAMNG AWOrROxrrw0 _ - ----'-_-- 544'56'11"E ITY'f AS M0EWAIX . _ UTU . P "q?Y Y o„ . '.' tr '? - i ..----- ------- --------- 35.38 F WOOD UiA1T FASP1101i O w PROPOM mRAnxE 2A506Wp1 TA ° `° J ••s„H r -tea 3 001 O° / PC, 9) sw AVENUE 1?O e?iwLboxr? P"6ON UWT GGI?RA? tNNt M a:- a o. % rl+" c? ;- 1 \\ 0.10 Aa TCN \ c\Sy PaAEWawE ?wvD TO %13R T^ CUM VNfSA lye l Q?y•'• ' ?i6 `p ++ , eus TER j l TV. f INR / ', PR6wa °r PTO BE F) Lm 0.11 Ar it fl? 4 E3? [•,,r? RPj.?''? '/ 9°mnw µmwi nox II NO PAWING IABQ J e ?9W' '1 ; ' XO PARIE:G IIBE F1 IPROPOSED LOM DMIUNE ffVP. • ?,;' ?/'pP? s - TREE LEGEND FIOSM006PRET NEST „ ?9 '1 ??•. ro BF IElOG1m SPEED NUP 1A = I ?. ?N1U? PAWNO sTWBn NSGFlIOx pE?A??(-______.I /^\ BAY NO Cf YR MASWRY COLUM tlRU GERRY NTH AUAWIM PICKETS BETWEEN COILY'E CITRUS GET SI46N FOR SPACNG NO PNIANG U1E p? \\\ \\\}? ? DEAD AD OAK MAX MAX I I ` , \ I I PPALM 11E tAIK? r'-i----------1 I -:me \? I ? I 2X 2" ALUM. POST EMBEDDED 60' (MN,) xGH ALUERNM GATE \? ---- I / NTO B' W M IY 0 CONCRETE WI PN2IETG 1 4" O.C. N I I 1 POUTED FOOTNG 1 6'-0 O.C. -? MAX L__J I I I . FUTURE ?DECORATIVE FENCE BUILDING E%ISiING LOT 1 BUILDING STORZ OPNTRALMICSe INC. CURVE DATA I PARK PLACE aM'eE M6 - wam L[NGTX BEAMNC D iA a GlaaO .1 1126 sM. m Ae w s HANDICAFFED STALL DETAIL 6RQm 361 ,P0. SI 021 ds CS 9A 1m. 2Ma21 mp'41 d- 1% 40 • Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 4:09 PM To: Patni, Himanshu; 'D.Craig Brashier' Cc: 'fcollins@jmgrealty.com;'cbrownthurman@comcast.net'; Elbo, Bennett; Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve The trees also need to be surveyed (triangulated) at the sidewalk tie-in at building12 as well as the trees along Hamden. -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:01 AM. To: D.Craig Brashier' Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; Elbo, Bennett; Albee, Rick; Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Craig, This is acceptable to us in traffic but still needs to show the sidewalk/ramp work that needs to be done for the sidewalk coming out to Hampton Rd. on Sheet 2 of 3. I've shared this with Rick and Wayne as well & they may have some comments. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:11 PM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve --- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 01127/2009 05:09 PM ---- D.Craig Brashier To: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com, Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com 0112712009 05:09 PM cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): 4391-000-000 Himanshu - I have attached the revised site plan for Grand Reserve. Please review and let me know if you have any comments or questions. Talk with you soon. 2/3/2009 Page 2 of 2 D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 2/3/2009 r- W Page 1 of 2 01 0 Wells, Wayne From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:01 AM To: 'D.Craig Brashier' Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; Elbo, Bennett; Albee, Rick; Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Craig, This is acceptable to us in traffic but still needs to show the sidewalk/ramp work that needs to be done for the sidewalk coming out to Hampton Rd. on Sheet 2 of 3. I've shared this with Rick and Wayne as well & they may have some comments. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:11 PM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve ----- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 01/27/2009 05:09 PM --- D.Craig Brashier To: Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com, Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com 01/27/2009 05:09 PM cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Revised Site Plans for Grand Reserve Project(s): 4391-000-000 Himanshu - I have attached the revised site plan for Grand Reserve. Please review and let me know if you have any comments or questions. Talk with you soon. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 1/29/2009 k Page 2 of 2 0 0 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 1/29/2009 Page 1 of 1 • Wells, Wayne • From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 11:28 AM To: 'D.Craig Brashier' Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve Thanks. The formal procedure for submitting building permit plans requires 8 copies unless Wayne or anyone else in Planning/Development Review has other requirements for this case. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:06 AM To: Patni, Himanshu Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve We'll definitely send over a draft to you before we send in the final copies. What is the formal procedure for submitting the final copies? How many do you need? I am trying to get the slope issue with the sidewalk taken care of today. It might be Monday, though. Craig 1/25/2009 Page 1 of 6 • Wells, Wayne From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 3:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Albee, Rick; Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary To prevent resubmittals in the interest of time I am going to request that King Engr. send us a draft once they have it for a quick traffic review before the building permit plans are submitted. We will share whatever we have with you as well. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 1:49 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Cc: Albee, Rick; Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Thanks for the update! Are these plans to be submitted for a BCP or are they just for your review at this time prior to submitting for a BCP? Either way, I need to review these plans when submitted. Thanks again. -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 11:47 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Albee, Rick; Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Just FYI. The consultant is working on revising plans based on our field meeting last Friday & we've finalized all the aisles and access routes/connections they need to provide for us to sign off on. There will be some trees that will be impacted and they are aware of all the requirements that Rick has including tree permits and replacing trees that are lost. We expect a new set of plans in the next few days. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:28 AM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Cc: Albee, Rick Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary This project has been dragging for way too long and should be an expired FLD case due to such foot dragging on the applicant's part (some for unforeseen reasons beyond their control). BCP2007-01343 was voided due to inactivity on obtaining the permit. I have had to threaten Code Enforcement action to get this to this point. Due to this being a way overdue requirement to be constructed, I just want to impress a need to not let this go on too long. There needs to be some amount of urgency to keep this moving and not stall again. Please keep me in the loop as to what is being decided. Also, please keep the approved plan under 1/22/2009 Page 2 of 6 C FLD2006-05029 and the conditions of approval in mind when looking at solution options (see attached Staff Report and Development Order). Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:55 AM To: Elbo, Bennett; Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Correct. We'll have a finalized solution of some kind in the next few days and then it will be up to King Engr. to submit revised plans, probably sometime next week. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Cc: Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Himanshu and I are currently scheduling a field meeting with Mr. Braisher along with Rick Albee. We need Rick's input as to determine whether the proposed location of any accessible route will impact trees. And to see if we can get rid of certain trees to fit the accessible route. I understand the owner would like to join us as well. Most likely the meeting will be tomorrow morning. Bennett Elbo Engineering Specialist City's Traffic Operations Division tel: (727)562-4775 fax: (727)562-4755 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:14 PM To: Rice, Scott; Elbo, Bennett Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Any update on this sidewalk issue? Have we heard from Craig Brashier with the solution? -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:41 PM To: Elbo, Bennett Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Thanks Ben. 1/22/2009 Page 3 of 6 D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:39 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Yes, Himanshu and I met with him on site 1 week ago. Some of the possible solutions that we came up with are: 1) Attaing a waiver from DCA. In some places creating an accesssible path from building to building is not achievable without spending large sums of money and removing trees. 2) Reduce the amount of H/C parking spaces to a minimum as set forth by the Fair Housing Act. 3) Re-locate and/or re-arrange h/c parking spaces to allow closer access to curb ramp without sacrificing regular parking spaces or making driveaisles non compliant or wheeling behind parked vehciles. Mr. Craig Brashier is going to study his options and talk with the owner and contact us on what he will do. Currently we are awating his solution and a revised site plan. Bennett Elbo From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thu 12/4/2008 12:55 PM To: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FW: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Ben, Did you go out to the site with this guy? D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 6:26 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary 1/22/2009 Page 4 of 6 Status? -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:09 PM To: Rice, Scott; Elbo, Bennett Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott/Bennett - Any update on the review of the plans? Is Rick Albee getting involved at this point? Wayne -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:03 PM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott & Wayne - Good afternoon, gentlemen. I wanted to follow up on the review of the proposed revisions to the Grand Reserve site plan and ADA accessible routes. Please let me know what I can do to assist in this process. I am available next week for a conf call to discuss if necessary. I look forward to hearing back from you. Have a great weekend. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.King_Engineering.com ---- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 11114/2008 01:55 PM D.Craig Brashier To: <Scott. Rice@ myClearwater.com> 10/24/2008 01:58 PM cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meetir Project(s): 4391-000-000 Attached are the handouts from last week's meeting. Wayne 1/22/2009 Page 5 of 6 0 0 Wells has a full size copy of the site plan with proposed revisions. Please let me know if you need anything else for your review. Craig KEA <Scott. Rice@myClearwater.co m> To: <CBrashier@kingen 10/24/2008 08:33 AM cc: <Wayne.WeIIs@my( . Subject: RE: Grand Res Project(s): Do you have an exhibit or exhibits that could be reviewed with the memo? I am sorry I was unable to attend the meeting. I had something come up that I did not foresee when we scheduled. Thanks, D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Please find the 10/16/08 meeting summary attached. The handouts were provided to Wayne Wells at the meeting. Please let me know if anyone needs additional copies of this material. We look forward to hearing back from you on this project. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II King Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 1/22/2009 Page 6 of 6 0 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 1/22/2009 Page 1 of 5 Wells, Wayne From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:31 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Cc: Albee, Rick Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Understood. We've already been moving on it but will finalize everything in the next few days. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:28 AM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Cc: Albee, Rick Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary This project has been dragging for way too long and should be an expired FLD case due to such foot dragging on the applicant's part (some for unforeseen reasons beyond their control). BCP2007-01343 was voided due to inactivity on obtaining the permit. I have had to threaten Code Enforcement action to get this to this point. Due to this being a way overdue requirement to be constructed, 1 just want to impress a need to not let this go on too long. There needs to be some amount of urgency to keep this moving and not stall again. Please keep me in the loop as to what is being decided. Also, please keep the approved plan under FLD2006-05029 and the conditions of approval in mind when looking at solution options (see attached Staff Report and Development Order). Thanks. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:55 AM To: Elbo, Bennett; Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Correct. We'll have a finalized solution of some kind in the next few days and then it will be up to King Engr. to submit revised plans, probably sometime next week. Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:37 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Cc: Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Himanshu and I are currently scheduling a field meeting with Mr. Braisher along with Rick Albee. We need Rick's input as to determine whether the proposed location of any accessible route will impact trees. And to see if we can get rid of certain trees to fit the accessible route. I understand the owner would like to join us as well. Most likely the meetirig will be tomorrow morning. 1/22/2009 Page 2 of 5 Bennett Elbo Engineering Specialist City's Traffic Operations Division tel: (727)562-4775 fax: (727)562-4755 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:14 PM To: Rice, Scott; Elbo, Bennett Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Any update on this sidewalk issue? Have we heard from Craig Brashier with the solution? -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:41 PM To: Elbo, Bennett Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Thanks Ben. D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 12:39 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Yes, Himanshu and I met with him on site 1 week ago. Some of the possible solutions that we came up with are: 1) Attaing a waiver from DCA. In some places creating an accesssible path from building to building is not achievable without spending large sums of money and removing trees. 2) Reduce the amount of H/C parking spaces to a minimum as set forth by the Fair Housing Act. 3) Re-locate and/or re-arrange h/c parking spaces to allow closer access to curb ramp without sacrificing regular parking spaces or making driveaisles non compliant or wheeling behind parked vehciles. Mr. Craig Brashier is going to study his options and talk with the owner and contact us on what he will do. Currently we are awating his solution and a revised site plan. 1/22/2009 Page 3 of 5 Bennett Elbo From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thu 12/4/2008 12:55 PM To: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FW: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Ben, Did you go out to the site with this guy? D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 6:26 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Status? -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:09 PM To: Rice, Scott; Elbo, Bennett Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott/Bennett - Any update on the review of the plans? Is Rick Albee getting involved at this point? Wayne -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:03 PM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott & Wayne - Good afternoon, gentlemen. I wanted to follow up on the review of the proposed revisions to the Grand Reserve site plan and ADA accessible routes. . Please let me know what I can do to assist in this process. I am available next week for a conf call to discuss if necessary. I look forward to hearing back from you. Have a great weekend. 1/22/2009 Page 4 of 5 D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II :in Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 wwwXingEnAineerin corn --- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 11/14/2008 01"55 PM ---- D.Craig Brashier To: <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com> 10/24/2008 01:58 PM cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne.Wells@myCleam Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting SummaryLini Project(s): 4391-000-000 Attached are the handouts from last week's meeting. Wayne Wells has a full size copy of the site plan with proposed revisions. Please let me know if you need anything else for your review. Craig KEA <ScotL Rice@myC learwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 10/24/2008 08:33 AM cc: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Mei Project(s): Do you have an exhibit or exhibits that could be reviewed with the memo? I am sorry I was unable to attend the meeting. I had something come up that I did not foresee when we scheduled. Thanks, D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater 1/22/2009 Page 5 of 5 (727) 562-4781. -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Please find the 10/16/08 meeting summary attached. The handouts were provided to Wayne Wells at the meeting. Please let me know if anyone needs additional copies of this material. We look forward to hearing back from you on this project. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 1/22/2009 Page 1 of 7 E Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:13 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary This is the last correspondence I received on this. D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: Patni, Himanshu Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 10:52 AM To: 'D.Craig Brashier' Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Craig, Attached are the PDFs with some new proposed connections as discussed this morning. Looking into the Fair Housing Act more it looks like the connection to the shared clubhouse is required which brings us back to what we started with. As far as connecting to the bus stops on Hampton & Drew St. the best thing for us to do is meet again in the field to determine exactly where the stops are & hopefully Rick Albee can join us to determine which trees would be impacted. Please call me to discuss further when you've had a chance to review & let us know what dates and times are good for you to meet at the site. Thanks, Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:29 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Thanks for getting back with me on this, Himanshu. Wednesday morning works for me. Let me know if this is good for your group. Who all will be participating for the City? It will just be me on this end. Craig 1/22/2009 Page 2 of 7 • 0 <H i mansh u. Patni@MyClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 12129/2008 11:11 AM cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): Hi Craig, Sorry for the late reply but we have been pretty swamped with various issues in the usually slower holiday season. Ben and I will be looking at this sometime today or early this week and we can have a conference call. What days this week are good for you? Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 9:51 AM To: Patni, Himanshu; Elbo, Bennett; Rice, Scott Cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Good morning, Gentlemen. Have you had a chance to discuss the ADA accessibility issues at Grand Reserve? The property owners are eager to come to a conclusion on the improvements that need to be made so that construction can move forward and/or whether or not a waiver from certain ADA requirements should be filed. We would like to schedule a conference call as soon as possible to bring these issues to a close. Thanks for your help and cooperation throughout this process. We look forward to talking with you soon. Please give me a call if you have any questions or need to discuss any issues about this project. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.l<ingEngineering _com <H i mansh u. Patni@MyClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 12/08/2008 03:20 PM cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10116/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): 1/22/2009 Page 3 of 7 Hey Craig, We have not had a chance to revisit the site yet but have spoken with Scott Rice about our meeting. Ben and I will be reviewing this further hopefully sometime this week and will get back with you. A conference call sounds like a great idea once we put all our thoughts together. Thanks, Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 3:20 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Good afternoon, Himanshu. Did you have a chance to speak with Scott Rice about the ADA improvements for the Grand Reserve site? Did you go on another site visit? Please let me know if the City will provide written comments or if we need to schedule a conference call to discuss further. Have a nice weekend. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II . K n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 11/20/2008 03:26 PM cc: <13ennett.E1bo@myCIearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): Craig, What are some dates and times that will work for you? Himanshu Patni, P.E. Traffic Operations City of Clearwater (727) 562-4560 1/22/2009 • • -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:30 AM To: Elbo, Bennett Cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Patni, Himanshu; Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Page 4 of 7 Thanks Bennett. I'll look for your e-mail. <Ben nett. Elbo@myC learwater.com> To: <CBrash ier@kingengineering.com> cc: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, <Scott. Rice@ myClearwater.com>, 11/18/2008 09:26 AM <Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): Craig, You can join us if you wish. I will let you know the date and time of the planned visit by e-mail. Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Traffic Operations Division Tel: (727)562-4775 fax: (727)562-4755 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 5:15 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott - When are they planning on going out to the site? I would like to meet them if my schedule allows. Thanks. Craig Brashier KEA <Scott Rice@myClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com>, <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> 11/17/2008 03:09 PM cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): 1/22/2009 Page 5 of 7 Craig, Our traffic engineers have the plans and are going to go out and look at site this week. We will contact you with their recommendations. D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:03 PM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott & Wayne - Good afternoon, gentlemen. I wanted to follow up on the review of the proposed revisions to the Grand Reserve site plan and ADA accessible routes. Please let me know what I can do to assist in this process. I am available next week for a conf call to discuss if necessary. I look forward to hearing back from you. Have a great weekend. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www. Ki n? E n g i neeri ng co m ---- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 11/14/2008 01:55 PM ---- D.Craig Brashier To: <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com> 10/24/2008 01:58 PM cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16108 Meeting Summaryl_ IA Project(s): 4391-000-000 1/22/2009 Page 6 of 7 Attached are the handouts from last week's meeting. Wayne Wells has a full size copy of the site plan with proposed revisions. Please let me know if you need anything else for your review. Craig KEA <Scott. Rice@myClearwater.com> To: <CBrash ier@kingengineering.com> 10/24/2008 08:33 AM cc: <Wayne.WeIIs@myCIearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16108 Meeting Summary Project(s): Do you have an exhibit or exhibits that could be reviewed with the memo? I am sorry I was unable to attend the meeting. I had something come up that I did not foresee when we scheduled. Thanks, D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Please find the 10/16/08 meeting summary attached. The handouts were provided to Wayne Wells at the meeting. Please let me know if anyone needs additional copies of this material. We look forward to hearing back from you on this project. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II K n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 1/22/2009 Page 7 of 7 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KinciEngineering.com 1/22/2009 Page 1 of 4 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:30 AM To: Elbo, Bennett Cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Patni, Himanshu; Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Thanks Bennett. I'll look for your e-mail. <Bennett. Elbo@myC lea rwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com>, < Scott. Rice@ myClearwater.com>, 11/18/2008 09:26 AM <Himanshu.Patni@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): Craig, You can join us if you wish. I will let you know the date and time of the planned visit by e-mail, Bennett Elbo City of Clearwater Traffic Operations Division Tel: (727)562-4775 fax: (727)562-4755 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 5:15 PM To: Rice, Scott Cc: Elbo, Bennett; CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott - When are they planning on going out to the site? I would like to meet them if my schedule allows. Thanks. Craig Brashier KEA 1/22/2009 Page 2 of 4 <ScotL Rice@myCIearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com>, <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> 11/17/2008 03:09 PM cc: <Bennett.Elbo@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): Craig, Our traffic engineers have the plans and are going to go out and look at site this week. We will contact you with their recommendations. D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:03 PM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott & Wayne - Good afternoon, gentlemen. I wanted to follow up on the review of the proposed revisions to the Grand Reserve site plan and ADA accessible routes. Please let me know what I can do to assist in this process. I am available next week for a conf call to discuss if necessary. I look forward to hearing back from you. Have a great weekend. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 wwwXin Engineering.;com ---- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 11/14/2008 01:55 PM ---- D.Craig Brashier To: <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com> 10/24/2008 01:58 PM cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summaryl;un k Project(s): 4391-000-000 1/22/2009 Page 3 of 4 • Attached are the handouts from last week's meeting. Wayne Wells has a full size copy of the site plan with proposed revisions. Please let me know if you need anything else for your review. Craig KEA <Scott. Ri ce@myCIearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 10/24/2008 08:33 AM cc: <Wayne.WeIIs@myCIearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): Do you have an exhibit or exhibits that could be reviewed with the memo? I am sorry I was unable to attend the meeting. I had something come up that I did not foresee when we scheduled. Thanks, D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Please find the 10/16/08 meeting summary attached. The handouts were provided to Wayne Wells at the meeting. Please let me know if anyone needs additional copies of this material. We look forward to hearing back from you on this project. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II in g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 1/22/2009 Page 4 of 4 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 1/22/2009 f Page 1 of 3 • • Wells, Wayne From: Elbo, Bennett Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:30 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Cc: Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16108 Meeting Summary Himanshu and I will visit the site sometime the end of this week with our recommendations. Ben -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:09 PM To: Rice, Scott; Elbo, Bennett Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott/Bennett - Any update on the review of the plans? Is Rick Albee getting involved at this point? Wayne -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:03 PM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott & Wayne - Good afternoon, gentlemen. I wanted to follow up on the review of the proposed revisions to the Grand Reserve site plan and ADA accessible routes. Please let me know what I can do to assist in this process. I am available next week for a conf call to discuss if necessary. I look forward to hearing back from you. Have a great weekend. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 1/22/2009 Page 2 of 3 ---- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 11/14/2008 01:55 PM ----- D.Craig Brashier To: <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com> 10/24/2008 01:58 PM cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting SummaryLink Project(s): 4391-000-000 Attached are the handouts from last week's meeting. Wayne Wells has a full size copy of the site plan with proposed revisions. Please let me know if you need anything else for your review. Craig KEA <Scott. Rice@myClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 10/24/2008 08:33 AM cc: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): Do you have an exhibit or exhibits that could be reviewed with the memo? I am sorry I was unable to attend the meeting. I had something come up that I did not foresee when we scheduled. Thanks, D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Please find the 10/16/08 meeting summary attached. The handouts were provided to Wayne Wells at the meeting. Please let me know if anyone needs additional copies of this material. We look forward to hearing back from you on this project. 1/22/2009 Page 3 of 3 r ? • D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II ?.11 g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 1/22/2009 t Page 1 of- 1? 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 2:09 PM To: Rice, Scott; Elbo, Bennett Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott/Bennett - Any update on the review of the plans? Is Rick Albee getting involved at this point? Wayne -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 2:03 PM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Scott & Wayne - Good afternoon, gentlemen. I wanted to follow up on the review of the proposed revisions to the Grand Reserve site plan and ADA accessible routes. Please let me know what I can do to assist in this process. I am available next week for a conf call to discuss if necessary. I look forward to hearing back from you. Have a great weekend. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II K n Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com - Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 11/1412008 01:55 PM --- D.Craig Brashier To: <Scott. Rice@myCleanaater.com> 10/24/2008 01:58 PM cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com, Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting SummaryLink Project(s): 4391-000-000 Attached are the handouts from last week's meeting. Wayne Wells has a full size copy of the site plan with proposed revisions. Please let me know if you need anything else for your review. 1/22/2009 Craig KEA <ScotL Ri ce@myCIea rwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 10/24/2008 08:33 AM cc: <Wayne.WeIIs@myCIearwater.com> Subject: RE: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Project(s): Do you have an exhibit or exhibits that could be reviewed with the memo? Page 2 o-Lr'/-2i' Z. am sorry I was unable to attend the meeting. I had something come up that I did not foresee when we scheduled. Thanks, D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Please find the 10/16/08 meeting summary attached. The handouts were provided to Wayne Wells at the meeting. Please let me know if anyone needs additional copies of this material. We look forward to hearing back from you on this project. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II King Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987. 1/22/2009 • LEGEND TREE LEGEND CURVE DATA "--? STDRN sE Vr£ MLET F? ?? 3 F1M_":l F:`_'.^. SAxI xXOeE - - °s^^ - -G nX ` II IAT I L111 J.1 T?wnreIEXPxP . NIA w 'RE KEPT, CONKCT ON (FDC) {?J ;w _ wFe IS. A, FIRE -RN ASS- (FXA) ... J LOT i SA. IT ) - .- ACDEIdd?99 Ad44?xN R Xw.N--? ^, lq \ -'T-- Z IIA NIA NJNBERxO?PARNM6 sPACE9 ® iJ?? \ \_• /a ' / \ x?Ri 3ARTe • I w SCALE. 50 i w XIA A-10A LANDSCAPWS D " Cx's' ssx ?\ ?i `? ` N / .nrv o°iis•'?nxx ?4 e Itrt uN euN NIA DON-TE .sc'.va rV'Y3p. I • d NIP WETLAND FLL AREA i ?? ":.?\ \ \ "' sP/ "qr. / a:qC P a '" °SSI .FO1 F S EXISTING 6 STORY N ?.6• ? ? OFFICE BUILDING/ 9W ? ?- . y a V v ? ? ; I N}d ? - • ® ? Pb D ref' r.? .... _ _ 'app/ • _4X \ °P ai r eRn ' n W .n. s3 ? -. a4,q A,t,fT ,r°NPx u'w'n 'n. ? - M ?yC,ol?.Yy4p _ _ Z ??? p.p.. a `IgpA?al re ura' 4P4 Y ?_ • . l? fiY.u '. ° . cwx !-'? x' v.cw ? 2 ? x pr. I r y i '^ rx r, m x Xote° S6YIDICNTED 54GN DETAIL Tn.Nw nou Nxer rnxnra ?oEOe.. "?x ex. rt.a ` J l? ` ?? / '. or Nwo .urs ro ,IX ? ? ' b .? ' 4 e °e or ru. eiN¢ xa.x*u ? ? •• NQ2.04' S9" E I uErw.XO '.o p,., a,. 4.zs' rJ J ... a R CtjeO?SaT• '- i S N40?] 064"E ; r 6 ys. 'd '4 s1,,T....ta crwy.rn nv. L- 4 - Y a PROPOSED 4F , g?k F.., /x?n s whew ui Y STDRRWATER e fT / 57 41'.2 RWIw rxu g A ,e / 4182 ' - FA U LATU N72+23'3Q'E 1 I ?i ip.K aSI?:C$ ?/ wu.n f I I e? //s a w 41,99' 1 Sim `• 1 r,/?C, I 1 N 2jB ?• 1 / nncW rl h i I I IT -A. F ••F?N'Y`. IiEO ? I .naxwewua N559'39'4?'E 1 I 9 STO,gspv?. I wr n" -\ ? 67.80' Y9 Nnxa sr' I XESRde' ^"SM.XI s \ ?, I I •' iAL': trV y.SOU. 1 Icmf,lncl \ { i 9 w? .,T.KTIgNR;? / / 1 1 1 C> ^V?1f J I / 1 1 ? MaRNTWW, , / , / - - Sp0.19'21"E 564.52' HAIETON ROAD (CE IDMICATED TO rN -1 CTF ) RING ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE a-oe Pooco XPXO1CeP PCCEe. PER uTV CowEXT. xW Erlgln j Plannan Sur FINAL SITE PLAN ? ADDET- xRNTE" r" C . XEVI .P 11-11-11 'M L Tryon • SdanthtR Und.upe Archlteptl DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES D TDRX L.? . XT 21.11 PP Q = - REV PEn. oRC BITE ux REVIEW. o-ax S LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOT 2 rIy Yisw. n ? rr S REV. PER. ORC PA..PSITE PLAN REVIEN 3 m sem s..m.. w.e - U Z APA"I TB OREW • °1°0® yp1L 1RT1 tN OPPI C NE ENTER WATER STORAGE PACIIITT n?aw.M -47 0 2 G = R . .? S69'54 '49•W 1.. ..., 50 00' N00'22'26'E _ CITY OP CLEARWATER VACANT _ . w?. a :,,R o• ? r -r Ns® x axx w my ... ' + ..rp • ®' .. II 'a ,unc xna s - •I / `0?0 / r??::: LJ VACANT ti0 !• 3 STORY + ®. I, t ?aumm W. a^ (E CNt CuM?) P . `0... 71NLIiOINT Y ?' C. _3Q A ?', .AR ' J, ''J•1Y"i \l a / Tcw,? act ' '2 cm "snmw ? , ?w W • ] SMY • ND 0, glary ' R 9. u - .? • 6,0 ,P ,.wowx,. wmx ..- ® Mm ? • z _ N: .. d?.... ?. •6 ? it ?°U• ? ` ? ? ` ` .. • Ll ? r '?? P • .?? ,?Y.?'a . ? :c C ??.•? e,wVm * • ,F ? T a : - N? @e_ w Qn ORNw.i III •a. - _ v'"`im" I I w s r • } I I ? ? 33 ? c.E • , • ILI '" oR' II ? YTNIER YANACTI?I sysuloo ?- I fl • _.- - ? R ,S >f _ (e ..?. ?..,. . •' „. ? - ? • _ _ •? _; ° - _.____ - - - ?1 ??r:: 500'OY49'w_ 2i-- - _ -- - --_ - 35.36' FAIRWOOD AVENUE .^!°.°.3ea°' rC ?,Y ' 01 ..? `PR.n`IAG[) O• ?•i '--,_-- `? II M ?FfJ ?f? l z?zz, rmY°?m •po••E£ -. I ?II Z 'l P '?? 9'?S f• zs. I I ` TREE LEGEND 11 ol 1 E c . - . 6 - - - - - - - - - - - I DECORATIVE FENCE I LOT , eu m I-E CURVE DATA 2101 l tTO11S IN OPHTNALWCB. ANE P ACE PM PLACE e C. NANDICApp FL STALL DETAIL KING ENGINEER ING ASSOCIATES INC. THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE FIN AL SITE PLAN 2 »'_;i REMM ""° °"'""YrncocNn c n ..? ErgMtan PlEnnan 3vrryen SdanNNJ LAndutpe Architect, DEL AMERN:AN PROPERTES ' o-,"-es uovEO Vac" cawsu a. rc cx unuTr cs.T LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 11 LOT 9 "T T wv - " , _ o- "-. ? a >a 3 • • LEGEND TREE LEGEND ® STOW SEWER RA aANTAWATER xpnA NOLF W..WA?iWpT {..( Cs PRE DEPT. •' CONE-ON (FOC) WI" -E HYDRANT NRLr (FHA) IIy"4: TOP OF BANK ITORI ? All( &iZIM}N.TN r ^ -'c NIA NIA -E. NI. N-ER OF PARMNO SPACES ® t ai ?\ NIA IxTEM. 11N09C0'.. NIA CONCRETE NIA WETLAND Flu AREA 1 I / ^? xwN EXISTING 6 STORY ?__ •-- o OFFICE BUILDING -T _ INN I - i IMP— -ANT MANDID4PR?ED 9?W DEl41L 7 ? -ANY F 1 ( TWw E i i r J L?? .. a. I ? I ? 1 I I I 1 1 ('? \\ d A CURVE DATA i ??-? II r 1 \ SAT r 1 F `\o„ i .lA ?? ` ANT BY. AS 9 •1921. 'E_ C% _ _ HAIdPTON ROAD (C.B. 144) Z? - - _ (DEDICATEL TO TIE CTTY OF tl.EMwA!Ell) KNA K/NG ENG/VEER/NG ASSOC/AYES, /NC. THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE SAP AccEn PER arr a 'B.-DO. BY— Engines Planes Surveyor 5<Imtlab landscape Archltecb FINAL SITE PLAN ' e---S. RE w ER R.1 crrr IEV11 -EAD _ DEL AWRICAN IS OPEITE! s roxse ADDm Tum LAxE AT arp. eoao Ra xvD. JIM 1=1 AW T, ?? __ 0--=_ Q I l LECE!!E DEVELOP hENT CORPORATION LOT 2 REY. PER, CRC afTE PLAN RFVEW. 112E SO-M REV. EFA. dtG PRFL fITE PLAN REKSY tia 8 IA • .e = a = g e - Q y TREE LEGEND 4 .... J j I l? O L- _j DECORATIVE FENCE I T I I eunninc STORE OMTMALrICS, INC. •^^_ 1 CURVE DATA I PARK PLACE HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL I AMS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, /NC. THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE FINAL SITE PLAN ' ° ' WA ° "O n 40 ° OR -° EnSlne- Planners Surveyor Scientists Landscape Arch@ects . o-ts_w ., ... ?. ¦° N DEL AMFAICAN PFIDPEIITES LOT S --; M,MM ,a•. P M oa< n . ,vim ° ?o?e o El EZ o .?. a LECElSE DEVELCPEENT CORPOM710N ?so-ae rc-a. - -. - ,N.aw 9 Page 1 of 1 • Wells, Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:28 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina Cc: fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Grand Reserve 10/16/08 Meeting Summary Please find the 10/16/08 meeting summary attached. The handouts were provided to Wayne Wells at the meeting. Please let me know if anyone needs additional copies of this material. We look forward to hearing back from you on this project. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II :in Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 11/2/2008 C NGiNEERtNG./WO( 1TfS fr%t- To: Wayne Wells, COC Scott Rice, COC Rick Albee, COC Gina Clayton, COC Brown Thurman, Consultant Fred Collins, JMG From: Craig Brashier, AICP Land Planner II Subject: Access Routes Date / Time October 16, 2008 @ 11 a.m. C 4921 Memorial Highway, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 (813) 880.8881 ? (813) 880-8882 fax www.kingengineeHng.com MEMORANDUM Date: October 22, 2008 Project No. 4391-000-000 Project Name: Grand Reserve ADA Location City of Clearwater Planning Department Conference Room Attendees Wayne Wells, City of Clearwater Brown Thurman, Consultant Craig Brashier, King Engineering Associates, Inc. Handouts Meeting Conclusions from April 9, 2008 Sheets 2 and 3 of the site plan w/ proposed revisions in blue (24 x 36) Currently approved site plan w/ currently approved ADA improvements in red (11 x 17) Proposed Revisions The meeting began by reviewing the conclusions from the April 9th meeting. Consistent with the conclusions of the previous meeting, the property owners revised the site plan in an attempt to reduce construction costs associated with the required improvements to provide ADA accessible routes within the Grand Reserve site. The following summary provides the proposed changes, reasons for the change, and points of discussion. O: WDNIM008Troject\4391-000-000\memo\meeting0l .dcb.doc While the main reason for taking a second look at the approved ADA improvements for the site was to reduce construction costs, not all proposed revisions are a result of this goal. Many of the proposed revisions to the site plan are a result of limitations created by existing topography, location of infrastructure, and/or existing vegetation. #1 The first revision proposed to the approved ADA improvements is to reduce the width of sidewalks to be constructed from 5' to 3'. This is consistent with Section 11-4.3 of the Florida Building Code. 11-4.3.3 Width. The minimum clear width of an accessible route shall be 36 inches (915 mm) except at doors (see Section 11-4.13.5 and 11-4.13.6). If a person in a wheelchair must make a turn around an obstruction, the minimum clear width of the accessible route shall be as shown in Figure 7(a) and 7(b). Exception: Curb ramps that are a part of a required means of egress shall be not less than 44 inches (1118 mm) wide. #2 The most common revision proposed occurs at Buildings 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 14. The currently approved site plan requires the construction of an ADA accessible sidewalk from the unloading area of the handicapped-parking stall to the front porch/landing area of each of these buildings. In each of these instances the topography makes it impossible to construct a sidewalk with an ADA acceptable slope. The base of the buildings and the porch areas are built much higher than the parking lot and the distance is too short to provide an acceptable slope. In some instances back flow valves, electrical boxes, or other infrastructure are also located between the handicapped parking stall and the porch area preventing direct connection via a sidewalk. To address this issue the property owners are proposing to extend and wrap around the 5' wide striping from the handicapped unloading area to the existing ramp on the porch in front of the building. In addition to the extension of the 5' wide striping, a "No Parking" label will be painted in the parking area behind the garage adjacent to the existing ramp on the porch to minimize vehicle / person interaction. #3 Proposed striping at Buildings 12 and 6, and between buildings 4 and 5 are to replace a required sidewalk that cannot be constructed due to topography, existing infrastructure, and/or existing vegetation. These striped areas will be 3' in width and provide the same connection as the sidewalks. The proposed striping at Building 12 will provide access to an existing sidewalk on site that leads to public sidewalks with access to public transportation. This striping will replace the required sidewalk that wraps around the east side of the building and would provide the same connection. This sidewalk cannot be constructed due to a severe slope in the topography of this portion of the site (probably due to erosion), existing trees located within this route, as well as concerns about the close proximity of the route to the slopes constructed as part of the wet detention area directly behind this building. Proposed striping at Building 6 provides access to this building from a handicapped parking spot and also provides an accessible route to an existing sidewalk on site that leads to public sidewalks with access to public transportation. Striping between Buildings 4 and 5 provides and ADA accessible route between these buildings. Striping in both of these locations replaces a required sidewalk that cannot be constructed due to the location of existing vegetation and¢ existing infrastructure, i.e. electrical boxes and/or backflow preventers. 2 O: WDMIN\2008TrojecA439I -000-000Unemo\meetingOl .dcb.doc Mr. Wells raised some issues regarding the size of the parking stalls and number of parking spots as a result of these proposed solutions to the site limitations. The parking stalls shown on the site plan are 9' wide and 19' long. The proposed striping would reduce the length of these stalls to 16'. The City of Clearwater Land Development Code (LDC) establishes a minimum of 18' in length for 90° parking stalls, however Section 3-1402 of the LDC does provide some flexibility in regards to the parking standards: Section 3-1402. Design standards for parking lots and parking garages. All parking lots shall be designed to meet the following requirements: A. Off-street parking spaces, including aisles, shall be designed in accordance with the standards identified in the following table. Parking space dimensions shall be revised where necessary to provide safe and efficient vehicular movement where columns, walls, or other site conditions impede maneuverability or vision. The property owners have also proposed to label all parking spaces shortened by the striping for the ADA route as "Compact Car Parking Only." Mr. Wells did point out that labeling parking spaces as "Compact Car Parking" doesn't entirely prevent other types of cars from parking in these spaces. The second parking issue at hand here involves the total number of parking spaces throughout the site. The adopted Development Order requires a total of 690 spaces (1.77 spaces per unit). With proposed revisions, the site plan contains a total of 788 parking spaces. This total is calculated as follows: Parking Lot Spaces: 601 Attached Garage Spaces: 90 Stand Alone Garage Spaces: 23 Driveway Spaces (Behind Attached Garages): 74 Total 788 Mr. Wells informed the property owner that tandem parking stalls were not recognized by the City staff or the LDC. However he did acknowledge that these parking spaces were addressed in the approved D.O.: Findings of Fact: 10. That additional uncounted parking within detached garages "behind" open, surface parking and parking outside of garages part of the attached dwelling buildings should be counted toward the overall number of parking spaces provided and that such uncounted parking should remain in place in the future; With the inclusion of the "uncounted" parking spaces, the site can afford to remove the shortened parking spots all together from the total parking space count and still have enough spaces to satisfy the requirement of the D.O. However, this seems to be an unnecessary waste of space. Therefore the property owner is proposing to restrict parking in these spaces to compact cars. #4 Striping is proposed along the northern end of the parking lot to the east of Building 5 to replace the sidewalk that is currently required along this end of the parking lot. An existing electrical box is located in the path of the required sidewalk. There is not enough space to reroute the sidewalk around the 0:\ADMIN\2008\Project\4391-000-000\memo\meetingO .dcb.doc electrical box due to the sloping topography created as part of the wet detention area adjacent to this parking lot. The proposed striping will eliminate two (2) parking spaces, but as indicated above, there is ample parking to meet the requirement of the adopted D.O. (the two parking spaces eliminated by this improvement were not included in the total parking space calculation above). #5 The currently required sidewalk providing connection between Buildings 2 and 7 was removed because the remaining sidewalks to be constructed will already provide an ADA accessible route between these buildings. Mr. Wells requested this summary of the 10/16/08 meeting and the proposed revisions to assist Mr. Rice in his review of the revised site plans. The meeting participants also discussed the tree survey that is required with submission of the building permit application. Mr. Wells suggested that we begin discussions with Mr. Rick Albee about this survey and that we should inquire about surveying only impacted. areas of the site. Therefore a copy of this letter will be sent to Mr. Albee to begin this process. The property owner believes that when all aspects and circumstances related to this case are taken into consideration, the proposed revisions provide resolutions that satisfy ADA requirements, the adopted D.O. and the City's LDC. We look forward to receiving feedback from Mr. Rice and reaching agreement on the revised site plan. Please give me a call at (813) 880-8881 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this project in greater detail. 4 OAADMIN OOMProject\4391-000-000\memo\meetingO1.dcb.doc • • Grand Reserve Nonconformity Issues Meeting Conclusions Date / Time April 9, 2008 @ 1:00 PM Location City of Clearwater Planning Department Conference Room Attendees Wayne Wells, City of Clearwater Scott Rice, City of Clearwater Brown Thurman, Consultant Fred Collins, JMG Realty Craig Brashier, King Engineering Associates, Inc. Conclusions Grand Reserve representatives requested the opportunity to reassess the proposed improvements to bring the project into compliance with requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It was agreed that Grand Reserve representatives will submit revised improvements to address ADA requirements to the City of Clearwater Planning and Traffic Engineering Departments in about 4 weeks and schedule a meeting with City staff to discuss proposed revisions. Wayne Wells stated that his main goal was to have the necessary improvements completed. He agreed that the development order issued on November 9, 2006, will remain effective, and that it will not be necessary to go through the Flexible Development approval process again to Terminate the Status of Nonconformity, even though the building permit submitted in January 2007 was voided by the City due to inactivity. Upon agreement of the revised improvements necessary to address ADA requirements, Grand Reserve representatives will submit a building permit to construct these improvements. This building permit application will also address review comments on the previous building permit application including submittal of a tree survey. Grand Reserve representatives asked about the benefits of rezoning the property to eliminate any future complications with the multi-family use. Wayne Wells recommended that Gina Clayton, Assistant Planning Director, be brought into this conversation. Page 1 of 1 0 Wells, Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:00 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Cc: cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Clayton, Gina; Albee, Rick Subject: Grand Reserve Update Good morning to all. I wanted to give everyone an update on where we are with the Grand Reserve project. At our last meeting, City staff agreed that we could take another look at the required improvements and propose revisions to the site plan that may be more financially feasible to the new property owners while meeting the necessary ADA requirements. To date we have reviewed the existing site plan and identified some minor revisions. The property owners are now obtaining estimates for the project with the revisions to compare with previous estimates for the existing site plan. Once the financial comparisons have been made, we would like to come back in to discuss these proposed revisions with City of Clearwater staff. This process has taken a little longer than we thought, so we appreciate your patience and cooperation. We will contact you very shortly to set a date for this meeting. Have a great weekend. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II King Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA • JACKSONVILLE • SARASOTA • AUSTIN 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEqgiE!eeritlg.com 11/2/2008 Grand Reserve Nonconformity Issues Meeting Conclusions Date / Time April 9, 2008 @ 1:00 PM Location City of Clearwater Planning Department Conference Room Attendees Wayne Wells, City of Clearwater Scott Rice, City of Clearwater Brown Thurman, Consultant Fred Collins, JMG Realty Craig Brashier, King Engineering Associates, Inc. Conclusions Grand Reserve representatives requested the opportunity to reassess the proposed improvements to bring the project into compliance with requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It was agreed that Grand Reserve representatives will submit revised improvements to address ADA requirements to the City of Clearwater Planning and Traffic Engineering Departments in about 4 weeks and schedule a meeting with City staff to discuss proposed revisions. Wayne Wells stated that his main goal was to have the necessary improvements completed. He agreed that the development order issued on November 9, 2006, will remain effective, and that it will not be necessary to go through the Flexible Development approval process again to Terminate the Status of Nonconformity, even though the building permit submitted in January 2007 was voided by the City due to inactivity. Upon agreement of the revised improvements necessary to address ADA requirements, Grand Reserve representatives will submit a building permit to construct these improvements. This building permit application will also address review comments on the previous building permit application including submittal of a tree survey. Grand Reserve representatives asked about the benefits of rezoning the property to eliminate any future complications with the multi-family use. Wayne Wells recommended that Gina Clayton, Assistant Planning Director, be brought into this conversation. PROPOSED -CAT [IXNRE TO nAK M CUTQP WATER STORAGE FACILITY fRCPOSEa S' H ClfuN LWK FENCE N BJIa 9ETBAIX . h x' aRe rm. 6? - I ' S89'54'49 "W 5000' f MaDx wwx G ? A? Q r ?, - ,?' VDIIEYBALL AREA ? O ^ M CSEO 6 H AIN P ' t ': W s y? 8 LINK CH ENCE N BJLgNO SETBACK ? S r Ke r ?0 cA?e TENNIS CO Rr VACANT '? O,T? `• ? DDCRS r r 1 • - O4J ?KEm FCMTNUI 119.). _?.r C PW BARER -?(? R is ®r PUMP t r E 1 SOr i SCSI N WALL ? GDL[ CAYr AFKING _ ECYNNC AREA S4 CONPAC70R ?ttCODF I ? ?' p Y .V? . i} y Ro D j 1 SS ,? ? vRQp ? ? ID UNOSCAFE o o ?' 7%JRER DA1E' , c - ?Y I ir ?< F 'UTE'BRICK P, U TE' BRICK 8 r , A ( 10 BE ANo DE p lt' AT AtMDATE) u ` '• SE1BnCWING " R // / 57R E?Itt G ?E s v / r ?O k„ ' " C? o 9CF ALN uENr ? ? / e ] 4?hy, } ' N em-D' c SEtBacK rPQ'Vl VARO „ ' 8 PROPOSED BLACK WALL ENITA - y r1' \ / f Pucizt M?T / Ch ? 1 I , _ - ? Ntil : APARTMENTS H¢d pz.- DRY DREW • 19 -?- Z SHOPPING CENTER ALN r0 CWECr TD o 15 5D 1aD G CENTEII PARKING LOT Ri. cATE SCALE 1" = 50' 10' LAIOSCAPE BU[4ER "III CITY Of CLEAgWATER VACANT II K .- a 33' u II 1 r .? A I u \ I II $$PR9FvSF6 A / R mIl rdANAEhfNT" `1t N" I?. I'll 2s'EDImIn P2 EJISINDY © S'rSYEM / 20Dp \ i II CyU ` ? ' ?' z E ? ? , 7 7 xi .r 6 1 4 [ ? '? '+?' s7DP s1DP a p3liW 3 ` PRroascD RETUUIxG " wAU / BuumEAD-r \ ^.._„e "? _ , R . s •, -??? ? PROPf f r v _ 9?. ^tt, v7 T., " ek3„ ©" Dcc??• y :_ V OR T HALF . J I IT 111 Q e w' " " r J O OFtaAAnVE rOUxlux N Lu[F .? f7 4 " * . wr M? . o rl ?p-? - f © ® PROPOSED STOIRMWATER MANAGEMENT A .+ - SYSTEM A # IW rb _ 0 d . 1 TOr de " ''. Iw ,5 k. .,• `0 LA.KE) ( -b NY ' I " P1i OP03? pJIFACE a STRU07URE y f?®s (?6J? 46 ??:• ? , ?' 'f?F _ . I ? I . ' ?'s \ r ®, ` ??' , 0.. ,.` p , f - 1 -_ ?G2 __ ? __-fi X. vAMxD? W 1_0_2 t _= 50003J9_ aarcYwon` - Dm ------ 3 §T?Y ,, e ae• PG - PDDE xcA FclwNL P?ty?tG GA pCE)4Pe Q 0..' EptE 1N v -emu ------------- 'F' CLRB 9H ' D `Y D\ '? L-I - EX NERINID r0NI BE BLUED D 10 AC- BUS SHELTER iT. R - . ?4 EM wEII.AND 10 BE CLLEO 0.11 AC. /:" PAEYIWAr PERMITTED 4CEgI " GS PEDTMAN OAR V % SIDEWALK CONNECTON . 1 m?mr p r, ` wsoNRr CO HLMP f S BE RM CO SPEED MNS N ?_NNREPAS+`+G? ^?y 1 NDLUNNB _ -__-_ \\\ - - - - - - - - - - - - i ?? `• I I ? ? ? I 1 E'K P' ALUM POST EMpEDDED I-EO" IMIN.) HIGH ALUMINUM GATE INTO 1- W X 17 D CONCRETE POI,RED FOOTNO 4 6.0- O.C. WI PICKETS IN 4" a. C, II I e NAM. _J J L - J I FUTURE DECORATIVE FENCE BUILDING I EXISTING M II 00 O 0 II roll ? I NI w a II ? I II ? ll ? II S44'5fi 11 E 35.36' FAIIIRE,WOOD PROPOSED xmnAIIYE AVENUE PROJECT SICN 1 III I IIII ?jll IIII ?II ?II I TREE LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BAY CHINA BERRY CIIRJS DEAD MYRTLE OAK PAL. PINE UNKNOWN W RsA..s-rr LOT 1 ...I mnm„ K w e.mgl.x. I I BUILDING STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC. CURVE DATA I PARK PLACE Ct RAD&IS LENGTH tANC01T CNORD BEARING DELTA HANDICAPPED STALL DETAfL Ct .-M 55.51' 15.26' 3615D -1642- DM5'46 f Cl 690.OD CdQ 199.49 --S 513'55 C -1505 C, 255.00 29L94 160.0 E50.21 W_14 D53J CI D A KING ENG/INFER/NG ASSOC/ATES /NC THE GRA RESERVE A s-os- s nooeo nnNOlcnr ACCESS PER clTr ca MENTS i e oDt-DaD AM - P .1-1 T- - -- -T1 "Al III "I"I , ND T PARK PLACE FOR FINAL SITE PLAN 1 2-R,-97 REVISED RATER MAIN G MOVED TCR COMP ? F-- aw/CAD M Engineers Planners • Surveyors • Scientists ' Landscape Architects - DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES 5 0-i6-96 X UTLI MOVED R COLUMN OUT OF EX. ESMi ?0O w ., .4 . . emeay 5ne. ?? . a:uii, z 'A? D N S LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOT 3 3 9-30-96 R. O REV. PER. CRC COMMENTS a ADDED PARKING LOT PARKING "T` RWA .co ? AA h lent T9u4m .w'ti ss9R9 5 y FL s T I ,- ' M s 1 4-}Q-98 REV. PER. Cltt CRL SITE PLAN REVIEW n_TO 9a s o: ?G reIm aaa-ou uls7 e4 s-oso4 my 5G' - 3 LEGENQft E%ISTN. -PtwoseD ----=--® STORM SEWER INLET I1T x. e- sdn SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE P'BAN EAN OuT _Ex. 8-WW WATER MAIN c.o. NIA FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION (FDC) FOG y,FH FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (FHA) FIIA - -- TOP OF BANK (TOS) ?-•- -- ?? ACOE (1U1 IMIITION PMITS NIA NIA BUILDING NUMBER NIA NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES NIA INTERIOR LANDSCAPING NIA CONCRETE ,!,;.:jr NIA WETLAND FILL AREA D HANDICAPPED 913N DETAIL I / / I 1 I I I I I I - ------------------ - - - -- _ - -----_ HAMPTON ROAD (C.R. 144) Z ° T - - -_- - _ (DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER) TREE LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BAY DIANA BERRY C' LS DEAD MYRTLE OW( - PALM B' LON PINE UNKNOWN ? ?\ IS'BULDNG SETBACK \\\ PROPOSED 6' H CHAN LINK FEN. O?j? ?\ \ N BULDNG SETBACK 5S AN W I SAN NH RC ? I. • 3L60(9W I,E, .31.60 (N:,I "F' TYPE CURB (i` EXISTING 6 STORY / OFFICE BUILDING/ I? N?06 ? CURVE DATA CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA G 2000.00' 13.69' 6,91' 13.89' N309'S6'E 0 C2 365.00' 97.67' 49.13' 97.36 N2228 '05'E 159'59" Z 0 25 50 100 6C AL® Ex. WETLANYDPETD BE FILLED 0.70 AC. ' ??/ \'.. r r? r d\r - -v , ..N/\.; RRE pObI RMITTED .. . , W E%I // Y FC ,.. V STING m WEN L L TRASH ROOM DAILY TRANSFER PR BOPU O DINSEDG 6 SMETBACK CHAIN LINK FENCE _ 6 ' ae B Yr - -• ,,, P ?I..,.-\ (, _ J OF SOLro .A E TO THE IN / eEMPei ae?o LOCATE WEST e°. N N62-04'59"E IL 9 ?y WllNTENANCE STAFF PROPOSED SAMEEE CONN:CTIDN RND - Q 3 CHECK vALVE6 SYP, W ??? - 07 N4.0 34"E I o??-. /3 ,` I6 ,.'rc4R ?4W(STO? '44 06 r ADDRgNAL WETLAND BDFFER Z 1 e.'sm>\ Jf / 0 _b? 6 l` ;- PROVIDSD 525 sF 03 Nr_ ?h OiO OR-" f•/// / PROVIDE) 6D0 bF? BUFFER P O CONCRETE I MEDIAN VACANT / r OQOJ`p?r -: • r ,.. 12 '0 A L? `-1 t 1 4?gyfa 2P L - ?.(? aEDULrroN IN WETLAnnr Z' Q BUFFER 700 SF. r U PROPOSED ( r - POOL MANr lMLOrvG 0 I / ( J Z STOfd.TNATER k 4Q ; w a MODULAR BLOCK RErnlxnG MOLL 978°3?I?SE vT { MANAGEA`ENT oho I QO - .? i A11H2' I - FACILITY } 400 ho Du 1- 2 (LOCATION APPROXIMATE) M JNP Y - F PROPOSED ID' SIDEWALK a IS' BVhDNO SETBACK S3 6 °!Aae 0 u N V // PROPO ED DECORATIVE FENCE b .9 TILRY EASEMENT CONSIST NG OF -2 M 50 RY COLI.MNS N7Z Z5 3E °E T IL .? ) _ ' r Y %? - ' WTH ALUMINUM PICKETS BETWEEN COLCNINS O r F \ rg PAOP06ED LIGHT FIXILNE TYP P, ,. O ZQ " 1J f 99' z ft EX. WETLAND TO BE FILLED 0.54 AC. W a• OR V N' PREVIOUAY PERMITTED - 6 ` conc. SIDEWALK q?N?r m N 4 6 DOMESTIC WATER ? E% " ?J:T MEr2gs umxlr rvP) 2j? -) 1 ? ? I viu I N i / 1 N I r IDO' LEFT NAR LANE A 3D tdGTILE WAR STRP S' • I I ( ?/ J F m C N • ry. VACANT / v D <• /7T v - I ?iQiO / / a ro' LANDSCppE BUFFER A fLUBH LURE (T i• .' PROPASED ?..11 (W[itYp `Oa-6Fo CONYRVATION AND DRAINAGE CASEMENT S59A39 I14E ! a , u ST9R6RV'A? [gt -NATAL AREA " 67.80 n' BUILDING s6rALx ?AiANAFENFNT W ) 8 I IP 'f URT1aHAC.. 300 i Y DECORATIVE FOUNTAIN IN POND (EXISTING) ! 1 N tAC! R L LPL--? ?t I ?9C (W T.OETENT IONf ( (, /(J/ i )) 5' COXC. SIDEWALK N ?` 1 PROPOSED 6 H CHAIN LIN( FENCE 'I } \ PEDESTRIAN GATE AT CLWC, WA N \ 1^.^.' k ) ) 1 VV TD nauRTax RDdD I\ 1 \\ C \ O - ISLAND TO BE ""'A ED e - - L i \ \ \ \\ \ \\ a LV NO APED BY GR ND RESERVE ?E# \ OD TFALL n PROP SE CV \ ?} O RDR05ED e' WN E%TENSION / ) \ \ \\ \\\ \ 5 $ ?)%\ ??'( \ \ \ ` STRUCTURE \\'?\\\ r EXISTING I f. " - \\ \) WEIR \\ \ ? ? ?. BRICK PAVER MEg0.N \.°? J \ ? ) \\ / vv\vvV ????e vv e caNr A \ h ?) \ 4YDNCRETE WALK T ?+' \ 'Co \\/ \? Zp GO J z L s? zl , ALL -TE IT- >uMWA OVA K/NG ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES /NC. THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE s 9-05-06 ADDED HANDICAP ACCESS PER CITY COMMENTS ?ml160-001-000 FOR 4 2!'-97 REV. WATER SYSTEM PER CITY REVIEW JLw1cdD Engineers Planners Surveyors • Scientists Landsc? a Architects q 0.16-96 ADDED TURN LANE AT STA. 20.60 PR BLVD. P DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES FINAL SITE PLAN w" 2 `0Y"` Nalva6)s us. Is x em Iw. nwame A".. LOT 2 2 9-20-96 REV. PER. DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW. EAT E=L• " n. B9R2e F 1 "' 0 -X Do"° ?..°pp " I. A., d LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 4.10-96 e We In.r.y, FL -n I 4-30-96 REV. PER. DRC PREL SITE PLAN REVIEW 7-441 e AGJJG T?IbJI n SA}AN e eoe Ie6) 6W0901 M 1':50' 3 F Pagel of 3 Wells, Wayne From: D.Craig Brashier [CBrash ier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 10:41 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: CBrashier@kingengineering.com; Albee, Rick; Rice, Scott; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Re: Grand Reserve Meeting I usually don't schedule meetings a year in advance, so 10/16/08 @ 11 AM is what I meant to confirm. See you then. Craig KEA --- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 10/07/2008 10:39 AM ----- D.Craig Brashier To: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> 10/07/2008 09:27 cc: CBrashier@kingengineerng.com, Rick.Albee@myClearwater.com, Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com, AM fcollins@jmgrealty.com, cbrownthurman@comcast.net Subject: Re: Grand Reserve MeetingL,iA Project(s): 4391-000-000 Good morning, Wayne. Thanks for following up on this. 10/16/09 @ 11 AM works for us. We'll see you then. Craig Brashier KEA <W ayne.W ells@myClearwater.com> To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> 10/0712008 09:24 AM cc: <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com>, <Rick.Albee@myClearwater.com> Subject: Grand Reserve Meeting Project(s): Craig - Has there been a final determination of a time to meet? 11:00 am? Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 10:29 AM To: 'D.Craig Brashier'; Rice, Scott Cc: Clayton, Gina; Albee, Rick; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve Meeting 10/7/2008 0 0 Page 2 of 3 Because I am going to be in a time crunch to finalize staff reports that must go out on the 16th, I would prefer late morning (11:00 am). -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 8:41 AM To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina; Albee, Rick; cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com Subject: RE: Grand Reserve Meeting Scott - Thanks for the quick response. Since it appears that Wayne Wells and Scott Rice are available on the morning of October 16th, we would like to go ahead and schedule a meeting to discuss our proposed revisions to the Grand Reserve site plan to address ADA accessibility routes. Since this date works best with our schedules as well, we will follow up separately, as necessary, with anyone who is not able to attend this meeting. Please let us know what time works best for you. We are available all morning. Thanks for your cooperation and we look forward to hearing from you soon. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II JL11ng Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com <ScotL Rice@myCIearwater.com> 10/03/2008 08:32 AM Yes D. Scott Rice, PE Assistant Engineering Director City of Clearwater (727) 562-4781 To: <CBrashier@kingengineering.com> cc: Subject: RE: Grand Reserve Meeting Project(s): -----Original Message----- From: D.Craig Brashier [mailto:CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 8:18 AM To: Rice, Scott Subject: Grand Reserve Meeting 10/7/2008 Page 3 of 3 Good morning, Scott. Are you available on the morning of October 16th for the meeting discussed below? Please let me know as soon as you can. Thanks. Craig Brashier King Engineering Associates, Inc. ---- Forwarded by D.Craig Brashier/King on 10/03/2008 08:15 AM ---- D.Craig Brashier To: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com, Scoft.Rice@myClearwater.com 09/29/2008 01:12 PM cc: gina.clayton@myclearwater.com, rick.albee@myclearwater.com Subject: Grand Reserve Meeting Project(s): 4298-000-000 Good afternoon. Our team has made some revisions to the previously proposed solutions for addressing the ADA access requirements at the Grand Reserve site. We would like to come in and discuss these revisions with you as well as the next steps in this process. We would like to schedule a meeting for the afternoon of October 15 or the morning of October 16. Please let us know which day works best for you and your staff. We appreciate your cooperation with our team on resolving this issue and we look forward to hearing back from you soon. D. Craig Brashier, AICP Planner II n g Trusted Professional Services Since 1977 TAMPA - JACKSONVILLE - SARASOTA - AUSTIN - MIAMI 4921 MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, SUITE 300, TAMPA, FL 33634 V: 813-880-8881 x1264 F: M: 813-597-4987 www.KingEngineering.com 10/7/2008 Wells, Wayne • Page 1 of 1 From: D.Craig Brashier [CBrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:39 AM To: Wells, Wayne; Rice, Scott Cc: cbrownthurman@comcast.net; fcollins@jmgrealty.com; Clayton, Gina; Albee, Rick Subject: Grand Reserve Meeting Conclusions Attached are the conclusions and agreements we reached at the meeting on 4/9/08. Please review and provide comments as necessary. Craig Brashier King Engineering Associates, Inc. 813-880-8881 4/15/2008 PRO- Grand Reserve Nonconformity Issues Meeting Conclusions Date / Time April 9, 2008 @ 1:00 PM Location City of Clearwater Planning Department Conference Room Attendees Wayne Wells, City of Clearwater Scott Rice, City of Clearwater Brown Thurman, Consultant Fred Collins, JMG Realty Craig Brashier, King Engineering Associates, Inc. Conclusions Grand Reserve representatives requested the opportunity to reassess the proposed improvements to bring the project into compliance with requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It was agreed that Grand Reserve representatives will submit revised improvements to address ADA requirements to the City of Clearwater Planning and Traffic Engineering Departments in about 4 weeks and schedule a meeting with City staff to discuss proposed revisions. Wayne Wells stated that his main goal was to have the necessary improvements completed. He agreed that the development order issued on November 9, 2006, will remain effective, and that it will not be necessary to go through the Flexible Development approval process again to Terminate the Status of Nonconformity, even though the building permit submitted in January 2007 was voided by the City due to inactivity. Upon agreement of the revised improvements necessary to address ADA requirements, Grand Reserve representatives will submit a building permit to construct these improvements. This building permit application will also address review comments on the previous building permit application including submittal of a tree survey. Grand Reserve representatives asked about the benefits of rezoning the property to eliminate any future complications with the multi-family use. Wayne Wells recommended that Gina Clayton, Assistant Planning Director, be brought into this conversation. • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 7:58 AM To: 'cbrashier@kingengineering.com' Cc: Rice, Scott Subject: RE: Meeting on Grand Reserve Condos We are expecting to see you at 1 pm today. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Craig Brashier [mailto:cbrashier@kingengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 7:49 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Re: Meeting on Grand Reserve Condos I just wanted to make sure we were meeting at your office this afternoon at 1 PM. Please let me know if we need to know anything special to find you once we get there. See you at 1. Craig Brashier YEA -----Original Message----- From: <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:56:09 To:<PPoppen@kingengineering.com> Cc:<Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com>,<CBrashier@kingengineering.com> Subject: RE: Meeting on Grand Reserve Condos Yes, I am still available. -----Original Message----- From: Paulette C. Poppen [mailto:PPoppen@kingengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:16 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott; D.Craig Brashier Subject: Meeting on Grand Reserve Condos Wayne, I talked with you yesterday on setting up a meeting between you, Scott, Craig of King Engineering and client rep for April 9th at 1:00 p.m. We would like to meet at that time. I have not been able to get a hold of Mr. Rice, but hope he can join the meeting if available. Thanks for your help and please confirm your are still open to meet at that time. Paulette Poppen King Engineering 813-880-8881 I 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 5:56 PM To: 'Paulette C. Poppen' Cc: Rice, Scott; D.Craig Brashier Subject: RE: Meeting on Grand Reserve Condos Yes, 1 am still available. -----Original Message----- From: Paulette C. Poppen [mailto:PPoppen@kingengineering.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:16 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott; D.Craig Brashier Subject: Meeting on Grand Reserve Condos Wayne, I talked with you yesterday on setting up a meeting between you, Scott, Craig of King Engineering and client rep for April 9th at 1:00 p.m. We would like to meet at that time. I have not been able to get a hold of Mr. Rice, but hope he can join the meeting if available. Thanks for your help and please confirm your are still open to meet at that time. Paulette Poppen King Engineering 813-880-8881 4/7/2008 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 11:31 AM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Thompson, Neil; Rice, Scott Subject: 100 & 101 Park Place Blvd. Jayne - Thanks. It looks like we went through a process where the approval included certain conditions of approval and there has been a lack of follow-thru by the owner(s). My option at this point is to file code enforcement actions against the owner(s) to enforce the conditions of approval to gain compliance with the CDB approval. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 11:20 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: 'D.Craig Brashier' Subject: FW: 100 & 101 Park Place Blvd. Wayne, I did forward your message to our former client but apparently they are no longer the property owner so that's why no one has responded to me. Craig Brashier at King Engineering did the site planning on this and I am forwarding to Craig for his info. and he may be contacting you. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:29 AM To: Jayne E. Sears Cc: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com; neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com Subject: 100 & 101 Park Place Blvd.. Jayne - Were you ever able to find anything out regarding this project and building permit? I was informed yesterday that the building permit was voided by our Development Services staff for lack of response to comments, even after they were sent a letter on January 10, 2008. This project is now in technical default of the conditions of approval and it would appear the City will need to take enforcement action. Wayne > -----Original Message----- > From: Wells, Wayne > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 6:21 PM > To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) > Cc: Lopez, Michael; Thompson, Neil 1 > Subject: 100 & 101 P* Place Blvd. • > Jayne - > On October 17, 2006, Case No. FLD2006-05029 was approved by the CDB > with two conditions of approval. The first condition required the > submission for a building permit within 90 days of CDB approval for > the required improvements. On January 18, 2007, building permit > BCP2007-01343 was submitted, complying with this FLD condition of > approval. This permit is still in "received" status and seems stuck. > Department reviews of this BCP were completed in January and February > 2007, but there has been no activity since then. A five-month letter > was sent to the applicant on January 10, 2008, advising them to > respond to the comments or the permit will become void. If the BCP > becomes void, then there would be a cause for Code Enforcement action. > Is there anything you can do to get the owner/applicant to get moving > on obtaining this permit and actually constructing this permit so it > can be closed out? Any help would be appreciated. > Wayne 2 0 0 • s ? % LONG RANGE PLANNING DEvEI.OPM17 RL VIEW C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFI ICI. BOX 4748, CLEARWA H, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERvLCES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AvIiNUE, CUARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 November 9, 2006 Mr. Steve Williamson, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-05029 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Dear Mr. Williamson: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 17, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces), (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted) and (4) to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 26.99 acre subject property is located on both sides of Park Place Boulevard, south of Drew Street and north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard; 2. That the majority of the property on the west side of Park Place Boulevard (100 Park Place Boulevard) is zoned Office (O) District, with only a small portion on the south side zoned Commercial (C) District; 3. That the majority of the property on the east side of Park Place Boulevard (101 Park Place Boulevard) is zoned Commercial (C) District, with the northern portion zoned Office (O) District and the wetland/pond zoned Preservation (P) District; 4. That the property was developed in 1998 with a total of 390 attached dwelling units; 5. That the Commercial and Office Districts do not allow attached dwellings as a permitted use, therefore, the existing attached dwellings are a nonconforming use; 6. That approval of the request will allow the reconstruction of dwellings in the event of a loss or damage of 50 percent or more of the value of the buildings; 7. That there is no desire to construct additional dwelling units, but to simply have a Code conforming use; PRANK I I11MAND, ??9A?oR J(mix DoRAN CoI u:n.aut usitr 11 MY I WI11.10N, UA NCILM IBIT' BILLJON')ON, CUGNCILAII:MBI:R CAm.i:N A. PFIERSP.N, (,rn NULNIF.MBI:R "I" HIAL EMPLOY:NIFINT ANI) AFrrn,MA'Hvi: Acrlr>N H\wi.o) i:R,' November 9, 2006 Williamson - Page Two 8. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; 9. That currently a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces) exists, where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces). There does not appear to be any known issues of inadequate parking for this development; 10. That additional uncounted parking within detached garages "behind" open, surface parking and parking outside of garages part of the attached dwelling buildings should be counted toward the overall number of parking spaces provided and that such uncounted parking should remain in place in the future; 11. That two multi-family development signs, considered monument signs, exist (one at each entrance) at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted); 12. That these on-site monument signs are consistent with the scale of the entrance features they are attached to and their sign area is in context to their location over 70 feet each from the front property lines; 13. That a sign exists within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard at a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, which was permitted by a variance in 1997 to be constructed; 14. That the sign within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard near Gulf to Bay Boulevard is listed as a prohibited sign under Section 3-1806.L; 15. That this existing sign within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard near Gulf to Bay Boulevard is attractive and provides direction to the attached dwelling complex; and 16. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code; and 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That, within 90 days of CDB approval, an application be submitted for building permits to construct handicap sidewalk access between building, common facilities and the public sidewalk within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way, in a location and manner acceptable to the Engineering and Planning Departments, including the submission of a tree survey to minimize tree impacts; and 2. That sufficient parking be retained by having all uncounted parking spaces (within detached garages "behind" open, surface parking and parking outside of garages part of the attached dwelling buildings) remain in place. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within the time frame set forth in Condition #1 above. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. • November 9, 2006 Williamson - Page Three U The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expired on October 31, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.Myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. Sincerely,` Michae Delk, P Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslPark Place Blvd 100 & 101 Park Isle Condominiums (C, 0& P) - ApprovedlPark Place Blvd 100 & 101 Development Order 11.9.06.doc Message Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:57 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Subject: RE: Park Isle FLD 2006-05029 Jayne - I don't have a problem with a change to 90 days. Steve can make this change to 90 days as part of his presentation. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:52 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Steven A. Williamson; Rice, Scott Subject: Park Isle FLD 2006-05029 Wayne, regarding your staff report for the referenced case, would you support a change in the timeframe for the permit for handicap accessible paths to be 90 days (rather than 60 days)? The owner is an Atlanta- based company and they are concerned about whether they can meet the 60 days. As you know, they have to have a tree survey done first. I spoke to Scott Rice about this and he will support the change to 90 days. Since the matter is not on consent agenda, Steve can include this 90-day request in his presentation on Tuesday (if it is too late for you to change the report) but we would like to have your support. Thank you. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 10/13/2006 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:30 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-05029, 100 & 101 Park Place Blvd. S. Jayne - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case for the October 17, 2006, CDB meeting. Since there a Denial portion to the Staff Recommendation, this item will not be on the Consent Portion of the Agenda. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Wayne Park Place 100 & 101 Staff Rep... Message ? • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 11:32 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Steven A. Williamson Subject: Park Isle FLD 2006-05029 When available, please email me a copy of the staff report on this one. Steven A. Williamson will be covering the hearing as Tim Johnson has retired. Thank you. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 10/10/2006 West LONG IZ4NGIi Plnn\nG DP.vELOPNIENT Rf:vij;w • • C ITY 0 F C L E A R _WT AT E R, PLANNING DEPARTMENT r 1'osr Ornt:f: I3c:x 4748, Cl.f.Ai;wn"rr•.a, rj"cnurA 3375-4748 MUN1(,1PAL Sf;imrr:s Ll;f[.r)i:!(-,, 100 Sotrnj Mnrn.j; Avl:;;t r:, CLEARWAIlitt, Fl(AIUA 33756 "I'fa.IT lovf; (727) %2-4567 1` ;x ('727) 562-4865 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 September 14, 2006 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2006-05029) Dear Mr. Johnson: Case No. FLD2006-05029 for Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces), (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted) and (4) to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C, for property located at 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on October 17; 2006. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, z Wells, AICP Lx Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the nest CDBIPark Place Blvd 100 & 101 Park Isle Condominiums (C, O & P) - 10.17.06 CDB - WWIPark Place 100 & 101 CDB Letter.doc I kw l I la nl:rm, r:nl n w:.:,u+I I,, i ll l,l. j?l\',U\. (:rn ?.i .I L',I h:?I!sl:, L, 5;4"* 1,\I:LIi\ ri. ],!:r1?ICS P.\- (-,(11 I'.c 1! +.I. I'..\! I'I 1 11.`: ! ;vm) Al I IIt.\1 \'I'1\ !( ',c: l l( .\' I'.,\II'I c 111{1: Message 9 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:09 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Rice, Scott; Steven A. Williamson; Amy Wall; Dbly@ssd.com Subject: FLD2006-05029 - 100 Park Place Blvd. This a.m. I submitted the revised site plan with proposed handicap access accommodations in response to the remaining comments to be addressed. Please schedule the application for the October 17 CDB hearing. Please call me if you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 9/7/2006 t .? GENERAL ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: No Issues. 9/7/06 ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1: FIRE: Comment No. 1: HARBOR MASTER: Comment No. 1: LEGAL: Comment No. 1: LAND RESOURCES: Comment No. 1: Response No. 1: LANDSCAPING: RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Park Isle Condominium FLD2006-05029 -100 Park Place Blvd. S. No Issues. No. Issues. No Issues. No Issues. To accommodate the Engineering Department's request for sidewalks, submit a tree survey (with canopies) and, to insure limited tree impacts, place a note on the plans to place the walks "on grade" under the canopies of the trees. Provide prior to building permit. Acknowledged. Comment No. 1: No Issues. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: No Issues - project exempt - P&R requirements met prior to 1983 (Ordinances 3128-83 and 3129-83). ORIGINAL RY'c1»1:7) PLANW\,t'-l t AT y CIiY yr C?,i ..r-1Y:`+bA?{:R • • STORMWATER: Comment No. 1: ORIGINAL RECT. -1 rr-N No Issues. SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: No Issues. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: 1"71 0', 2006 PLANNliz. v f CITY OF CLEARWAicR Comment No. 1: Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118 & 119) http://www.mycIearwater.com/qov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp Response No. 1: Attached is a revised final site plan prepared by King Engineering Associates, Inc., which depicts the handicap parking stall and sign details. Comment No. 2: Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk and to multiple buildings on site compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. Response No. 2: Attached is a revised final site plan prepared by King Engineering Associates, Inc., including proposed handicap access accommodations: All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: Amend the request to include the Termination to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780) spaces). Provide appropriate justification. Response No. 1: Please see the revised Exhibit "B" to Flexible Development Application, including justification. Comment No. 2: To retain the signage on the walls on either side of Park Place Boulevard, the Termination request must be amended ORIGINAL to include the following: RECENED To permit the two multi-family development signs to remain SEP 07 2006 at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is pLANNiNG DEPARTMENT Ct1Y OF CLEARWATER 2 • 0 permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted). Provide appropriate justification. Staff may not support such request, preferring to have the signage brought into compliance with the Code. Response No. 2: Please see the revised Exhibit "B" to Flexible Development Application, including justification. Comment No. 3: To retain the signage within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard at Gulf to Bay Boulevard, the Termination request must be amended to include the following: To permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an areas of 45 square feet. Provide appropriate justification. Staff may not support such request, preferring to have the signage brought into compliance with the Code. Response No. 3: Please see the revised Exhibit "B" to Flexible Development Application, including justification. Comment No. 4: Site inspection reveals there is additional freestanding signage in the form of two banners each attached to four light poles on both sides of the entrances on both sides of Park Place Blvd. Records do not indicate any permits, for these signs. Please remove these signs. Response No. 4: The applicant agrees to remove the banners. OTHER: No Comments. 9/7/2006 10:11 AM 46723.111255 #378986 v1 - Park Isle Condo/Responses to Comments ORIGWAL RECEIVED SEP 07 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER 3 ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Civil Engineering Environmental Engineering Transportation Planning & Engineering Pavement Management Land Planning Ecological Services Surveying & Mapping Construction Management GIS Mapping Landscape Architecture #LC26000183 September 7, 2006 Scott Rice, Manager City of Clearwater Public Works Administration/Engineering Municipal Services Building, Room #220 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756-5520 E RE: Grand Reserve at Park Isle Revised Site Plan Dear Mr. Rice: Included with this letter are the required copies of the revised site plan for Grand Reserve at Park Isle. The revisions are consistent with the handicap access accommodations we discussed and sketched out at our August 16, 2006 meeting. One major assumption made at that meeting was that each building had "breeze ways" connecting the concrete areas at the front and rear of each building. A site visit confirmed that these buildings do have the connecting walkways. I have also included a list of all revisions made to the site plan. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, II Encl: cc: Amy Wall, Julian LeCraw ORIGINAL Jayne Sears, Johnson, Pope, etal RECEIVED 4921 Memorial Highway One Memorial Center Scott Sheridan, King Suite 300 File: 1808-000-000 SEP 47 2006 Tampa, Florida 33634 PLANNING ob-,o r-. riENT Phone 813 • 880 • 8881 CITY OF CLEr' RWATER Fax 813 880 8882 Pasco 727 846 0904 www.kingengineering.com O:MM;N'AQO\PX ?OiQ8A 3gAg? tatter\rice01.dcb.doc 0 ! Grand Reserve at Park Place 1808-000-000 Revised Site Plan Pg 2 of 3 1. Add concrete walk from existing walk to paved areas at rear of building #12 2. This concrete walk is already shown on a recent survey, needs to be shown on here as well 3. Move Handicap Unloading Area (HUA) to left side of space, add concrete walk from HUA to paved area in front of Building # 13, & add painted crosswalk 4. Add concrete walk from HUA to paved area in front of Building #12 5. Add concrete walk connecting paved areas at rear of Buildings 913 and #14, and connect paved areas at rear of Building #14 6. Show HUA on left side of space & add concrete walk to paved area in front of Building #14 (remove light pole symbol b/c it is not located here) 7. Connect paved areas at rear of Building #11 8. Add concrete walk from HUA to paved area in front of Building #11 9. Show HUA on left side of space and add painted crosswalk connecting the two HUAs, & add concrete walk to paved area in front of Building #10 10. Add concrete walk from Park Place Blvd sidewalk to paved area at rear of Building 410, insert gate along fence at walkway 11. Add painted crosswalks 12. Painted crosswalk to Building #15 13. Insert Handicap Sign Detail ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 07 200& PLANNING DEPAI IMEN1 CITY OF CLEARWATER 9 0 Grand Reserve at Park Place 1808-000-000 Revised Site Plan Pg 3 of 3 1. Extend concrete walk to rear of Building #5, OK to incorporate paved area w/ storm manhole 2. Connect concrete areas at rear of Building #5, minimize tree removal 3. Add concrete walk from Handicap Unloading Area (HUA) to front of Building #5, remove light pole symbol b/c it is not located in this spot 4. Add concrete walk along curb from paved area in front of Building #5 to paved area in front of Building #4 5. Add concrete walk to connect paved areas at the rear of Building #4 6. Add concrete walk from HUA to paved area at front of Building #4 7. Move HUA to left side of space and add concrete walk to paved area in front of Building #3 8. Move HUA to left side of space and add concrete walk to paved area in front of Building #2 9. Add painted crosswalk to connect the two HUAs 10. Shift the handicap space to the right and try to align the HUA with the existing concrete walk. Also connect the existing walk with the paved area in front of Building #6 11. Show HUA on the left side of the space, add concrete walk from the HUA to the paved area in front of Building #7, and add painted crosswalk to the two HUAs 12. Add concrete walk around the lake connecting all paved areas at the rear of each building, minimize tree removal 13. Add concrete walk from HUA to paved area at front of Building #8 14. Add concrete walk from HUA to paved area at front of Building #9 15. Add concrete walk from HUA to paved area at front of Building #1 16. Add painted crosswalk 17. Add painted crosswalk 18. Insert Handicap Stall detail ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 0 7 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMFr,X CITY OF CLEARWA%E RESPONSES TO COMMENTS Park Isle Condominium FLD2006-05029 -100 Park Place Blvd. S. GENERAL ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: No Issues. ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1: FIRE: Comment No. 1: HARBOR MASTER: Comment No. 1: LEGAL: Comment No. 1: LAND RESOURCES: Comment No. 1: Response No. 1: LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: No Issues. No. Issues. No Issues. No Issues. To accommodate the Engineering Department's request for sidewalks, submit a tree survey (with canopies) and, to insure limited tree impacts, place a note on the plans to place the walks "on grade" under the canopies of the trees. Provide prior to building permit. Acknowledged. No Issues. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: No Issues - project exempt - P&R requirements met prior to 1983 (Ordinances 3128-83 and 3129-83). STORMWATER: Comment No. 1: No Issues. SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: No Issues. • 0 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Provide handicap parking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118 & 119) http•//www myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index.asp Response No. 1: See attached letter from King Engineering. Comment No. 2: Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk and to multiple buildings on site compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. ORIGINAL Response No. 2: See attached letter from King Engineering. RECEIVED AIM 0 3 2006 All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVtsATER PLANNING: Comment No. 1: Amend the request to include the Termination to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780) spaces). Provide appropriate justification. Response No. 1: Please see the revised Exhibit "B" to Flexible Development Application, including justification. Comment No. 2: To retain the signage on the walls on either side of Park Place Boulevard, the Termination request must be amended to include the following: To permit the two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted). Provide appropriate justification. Staff may not support such request, preferring to have the signage brought into compliance with the Code. Response No. 2: Please see the revised Exhibit "B" to Flexible Development Application, including justification. 2 9 0 Comment No. 3: To retain the signage within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard at Gulf to Bay Boulevard, the Termination request must be amended to include the following: To permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an areas of 45 square feet. Provide appropriate justification. Staff may not support such request, preferring to have the signage brought into compliance with the Code. Response No. 3: Please see the revised Exhibit "B" to Flexible Development Application, including justification. Comment No. 4: Site inspection reveals there is additional freestanding signage in the form of two banners each attached to four light poles on both sides of the entrances on both sides of Park Place Blvd. Records do not indicate any permits for these signs. Please remove these signs. Response No. 4: The applicant agrees to remove the banners. OTHER: No Comments. 8/10/2006 10:17 AM 46723.111255 #378986 v1 - Park Isle Condo/Responses to Comments ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEFAktlrvlr- T CITY OF CLEARIVV'AT? I- ? 3 0 0 i 0 ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES INC August 10, 2006 Civil Engineering Environmental Engineering Jayne Sears Transportation Planning & Engineering Johnson, Pope, Bokor•, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Pavement Management 911 Chestnut St., Land Planning Cleatwater-, FL 33756 Ecological Services Surveying & Mapping RE: Park Isle Condominiums Construction Management GIS Mapping Landscape Architecture #LC26000183 Dear Jayne, The Park Isle Condominium Development is in the process of'convetting from. rental units to privately owned condominiums.. The City of Clearwater rezoned this property to Office (O), which does not allow residential units . Since this was an existing development, the Park Isle Condominiums was grandfathered in as a nonconfbtming use in accordance with the City's Code of Ordinances. Due to the rezoning of'the property by the City of Clearwater, it is necessary that the owners apply for a Termination of Status of 'a Nonconformity King Engineering has been working to address issues related to handicap signage and accessibility raised by the City of'Clearwater Traffic Engineering Department in the initial staff report for the Development Review Committee. After review of the relevant sections of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11 and the City's Code of Ordinances, King Engineering contacted the City's Traffic Engineering department to discuss the project., During these discussions City staff was made aware that the project was completely built out, and that no new construction was being requested Based on the fact that the development was complete and no new construction was being requested, the Traffic Engineering department representative stated that the ADA comments did not apply.. At the conclusion of these discussions, King Engineering requested a written verification of this decision. At the date of the City's deadline for submittal of information for the September Development Review Committee meeting, King Engineering was still awaiting the written verification from the City's Traffic Engineering department, Any additional information deemed necessary by the City of Clearwater as a result of the above mentioned conversations will be provided as soon as possible in order to ensure this application continues to move fbtward in the most efficient manner. Please contact me at extension 1264 if you have any questions or need any additional information.. ORIGINAL 4921 Memorial Highway Pr si0 ll RECEIVED One Memorial Center ' Suite Tampa,OFlorida 33634 --ter AUG 0 3 206 PLANNING- DEPARTMENT Phone a13 aso seal King E n cling Asso iates, Inc., Fax 813 880 8882 CITY OP C E,?1?WAlI ", Pasco 727 • 846 0904 www kingengineering com DCB/pep Offices in Tampa. Jacksonville, and Sarasota 0AADM1N\2006\Project\1180-001-000\letter\searsOI dcb.doc EXHIBIT "B" V) TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC 100 and 101 S. Park Place Boulevard The subject property consists of 26.99 acres developed with 390 multi-family units, and is currently zoned "C", "O" and "P" with accompanying land use designations of "R/O/G", "R/O/R" and "P". The parcel is part of the Park Place DRI and is designated on Map H of the DRI for 390 multi-family residential units via a land use conversion. The residential units on the property were constructed in 1998, prior to the adoption of the Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code"), but in compliance with the approved DRI development order and then existing zoning and land use designations. The adoption of the Code and designation of "C" and "O" zoning districts which do not allow multi-family residential use made the existing improvements a legal non-conforming use. After build out of the project Code text amendments increased the parking requirements from 1.5 spaces per unit to 2 spaces per unit. Accordingly, the applicant requests termination of status as a non-conformity in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code to allow: i 90 multi-family residential units as a permitted use1 Deleted: (i) ? _ _.. _ _.. _ _ _ ._. - _. _. __ . _ _ Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + 77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693'. 00 a parking ratio of 1 Numbering Style: i, ii, iii, ... + start . . spaces) where two spaces per dwelling unit (780 spaces) are required by at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.54" +Tab after: 1.04" + Indent Code; at: 1.04" Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + iii two multi-family development sins to remain at a height of 11 feet-, Numbering Style: i, ii, iii, ... + Start at, 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: (where a maximum height of 6 feet is permitted) and with an area of 45 o.54"+Tab after: 1.04"+Indent maximum of 24 sq. ft.isermitted by Code and sq. ft.Lvyhe re -- at: 1.04" .----. ::-:::::::-: -- --- -- -- --- -- - ` - i '' Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Iv y-' `r• '' ) a prohibited sign within the Park Place Boulevard right-of -wa to remain i, ii, iii, ... + start Numbering Style: at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: at Gulf-to-Bay Blvd with a height of 6 feet and an area of 45 square feet. 0.54" +Tab after: 1.04" + Indent The Planning staff has indicated it will be supportive of the termination of status as a Deleted: and (ii) non-conformity, as an alternative to the applicants' request for rezoning and land use Deleted: single-sided plan amendment, to make the existing use conform to Code. 0f Deleted: entrance signs, j Deleted: one Section D. Written Submittal Requirements Deleted: signor two 12 sq. ft. signs are allowed General Applicability Criteria: ...... ...... - -_...-------_ --::::. Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: i, ii, iii, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: i 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, 0.54" +Tab after: 1.04" + Indent at: 1 04" bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is . located. ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWlATER r 0 9 The 390-unit project has been in existence at this location since 1998 and is in harmony with the surrounding properties. The Park Place DRI is a mixed use project, including residential, commercial, office and industrial components. The compatibility of this site with other parcels in the DRI was confirmed at the time of development order approval. The existing density is compatible with the existing land use designations on the Property, which allow a maximum density of 394 units (see Exhibit "C" attached). The existing 693 parking spaces adequately serve the proiect At the time of construction the Code required 1.5 spaces per unit and the proiect had excess parking with 1.77 spaces per unit. The City has increased residential parking requirements making the existing parking non-conforming There is available parking in front of the unit garages which residents actually use for parking but is permitted to be included in the total parking area per Code requirements. The proiect is build out and there is no additional construction proposed, nor an area in which to locate additional parking. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. There is no new development proposed. The proposed termination of non- conforming status will allow the existing development to be reconstructed in the event of loss or damage exceeding 50 percent of its value. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The termination of non-conforming status will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The attractive, well landscaped entrance signs are attached to an entrance feature (gated wall) located over 50' from the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard and have no impact on motorists' visibility. The sign located within the Park Place Boulevard median has been at that location since 1998 and does not impact motorists' visibility. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The applicant is not seeking any additional density or intensity to what is currently in existence on the site, so this will not negatively impact traffic. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ORIGINAL RECEIVED ,,U 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER The City determined, through approval of the DRI development order, that multi- family residential use at this location is consistent with the character of this mixed use DRI. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The design of the project was previously reviewed at the time of site plan approval. As a residential use, there are no unusual acoustic or olfactory impacts. The existing development is an attractive and well-landscaped project. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non-conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. City staff has determined that the property complies with requirements 1 and 2. As part of this request, the applicant seeks termination of non-conformity as to the two entrance signs which are located on the property. The signs are 45 sg ft each (6' high by 9' wide) where 24 sg, ft. is allowed by Code. The signs are attractively designed as part of a decorative entrance feature at each gate to the development (one on Lot 2 - easterly entrance and one on Lot 3 - westerly entrance). They are not located within any building setback. The additional size is requested in order for each of the 45 sq. ft. signs to be consistent with the scale of the entrance features to which they are attached; and compatible with the size of the property (26.99 acres). The signs are attached to entrance walls/planters that are 11 feet in height and are therefore treated as monument signs requiring a request for height increase These structures are actually more than monument signs--they are an integral part of the security gates at each entrance. The applicant has included color photographs of the signs, which were constructed pursuant to approved permits, for staffs information and review. If the applicant were to remove the current signs and replace them with 4' x 6' signs to comply with Code, the permitted signs would be dwarfed by the wall/planter entrance features on 3 ORIGINAL RECEIVED +JG 0 3 zoos PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARkA €Ef 0 0 which they are located The increased size of the signs and height of the signs is justified based on their integration with the security gate and distance from the property line-over 70' on the east entrance and over 80' on the west entrance. The applicant requests that the existing sign located in the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard be allowed to remain. Section 7 of the amended and restated annexation agreement which is part of the Park Place DRI development order (Ord 3287-83) acknowledges that developer may locate identification signs within publicly dedicated right-of-way subject to sign regulations and review requirements as long as there is no danger to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. The sign was legally permitted and constructed in this location pursuant to a variance (SV #97-10) granted by the City Commission. 811012006 11:24..A rvL......... ............................. ............... . ............... _................ .............- _ _... Deleted: 6/5/2006 4:46 PM 341 19 07638 #375820 v3 - Park Isle/Ex B to Flex Aoa ... _.......... _ ._ _................._ ._ __ ... _..... _. __ _ .. - - Deleted: #375820 v2 -Park Isle/Ex B to Flex App ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 0 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARVI ATER 1?1 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 5:47 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: Draft DRC comments for FLD2006-05029, 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Jayne - Attached are the Draft comments for the above referenced case, to be heard at the DRC meeting on Thursday, June 29th at 11:40 am. Wayne draft 6.29.06 dre action agend... 0 CITY OF CLEgRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ClearWater MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM June 06, 2006 Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757-1368 RE: FLD2006-05029 -- 100 PARK PLACE BLVD S -- Letter of Completeness Dear Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-05029. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 29, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, L , Aa Wayn Wells, " AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2006-05029 - 100 PARK PLACE BLVD S Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 3:08 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-05029, 100 & 101 Park Place Blvd. S. Jayne - Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original will be mailed. Wayne 13, letter of mpleteness 6.6.06., EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC 100 and 101 S. Park Place Boulevard The subject property consists of 26.99 acres developed with 390 multi-family units, and Deleted: The applicant requests is currently zoned and "P" with accompanying land use designations of termination on of status as a non- conformity in accordance with Section "R/O/G", "R/O/R" and „P". 6-109, Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code"). The parcel is part of the Park Place DRI and is designated on Map H of the DRI for 390 multi-family residential units via a land use conversion. The residential units on the property were constructed in 1998, prior to the adoption of the Clearwater Community Development Code "Code" , but in compliance with the approved DRI development order and then existing zoning and land use designations. The adoption of the Code and designation of "C" and "O"zonina districts which do not allow multi-family residential use made the existing improvements a legal non-conforming use. Accordingly, the applicant requests termination of status as a non-conformity in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code to allow (i) 390 multi-family residential units as a permitted use and (ii) two single-sided 45 sq. ft. entrance signs, where one 24 sq. ft. sign or two 12 sq. ft. signs are allowed by Code. The Planning staff has indicated it will be supportive of the termination of status as a non-conformity, as an alternative to the applicants' request for rezoning and land use plan amendment, to make the existing use conform to Code. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The 390-unit project has been in existence at this location since 1998 and is in harmony with the surrounding properties. The Park Place DRI is a mixed use project, including residential, commercial, office and industrial components. The compatibility of this site with other parcels in the DRI was confirmed at the time of development order approval. The existing density is compatible with the existing land use designations on the Property, which allow a maximum density of 394 units (see Exhibit "C" attached). 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Cid.. JUN 0 6 mn- PLANNING DEPARTMENT CDy OF CLEARWATER There is no new development proposed. The proposed termination of non- conforming status will allow the existing development to be reconstructed in the event of loss or damage exceeding 50 percent of its value. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The termination of non-conforming status will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The attractive well landscaped entrance signs are attached to an entrance feature (gated wall) located over 50' from the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard and have no impact on motorists' visibility. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The applicant is not seeking any additional density or intensity to what is currently in existence on the site, so this will not negatively impact traffic. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The City determined, through approval of the DRI development order, that multi- family residential use at this location is consistent with the character of this mixed use DRI. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The design of the project was previously reviewed at the time of site plan approval. As a residential use, there are no unusual acoustic or olfactory impacts. The existing development is an attractive and well-landscaped project. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to terminate status as a non-conforming use or structure with the following requirements: 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 2 RECEIVED JUN 0 6 20F,pIANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLMMATER 0 0 The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. .City staff has determined that the property complies with requirements 1 and Deleted: The applicant is working staff to 2 As part of this request the applicant seeks termination of non-conformity with the Planning either comply with these requi requir rements, as to the two entrance siqns which are located on the property. The signs are apply for comprehensive landscape attractively designed as part of a decorative entrance feature at each gate to program approval, seek termination of non-co conformities, as the development (one on Lot 2 - easterly entrance and one on Lot 3 - appropriate. westerly entrance) They are not located within any buildinq setback. _ - Deleted: ¶ The additional size is requested in order for each of the 45 sq. ft. signs to be consistent with the scale of the entrance features to which they are attached; and compatible with the size of the property (26.99 acres). The applicant has included color photographs of the signs which were constructed pursuant to approved permits for staff's information and review. 61512006 4:30 PM. ................... ................ 34119.107638 #375820 v1 - Park Isle/Ex B to Flex App RECEIVEr JUN 0 6 20' PLANNING DEPARTNIrrvt CITY OF ClEI MA's ER W, 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:42 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Park Isle Map.pdf Wayne, please look at the attached info and call me to discuss. I'm revising our request concerning the signs and would like to talk to you about it. Thanks. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 <<Map. pdf>> 1 Sg , ) y? . No ?J ?? tis9 oTFJ?oo. 'moo z?Z5:? s zi. Ob -71. obs oo,, > . 1 A ?oJJ i • ?o Gti F? . ?s? ?Fti ova , ?J J' . 'Fo6 aqp p0` gyp. ?? / ?o t0 s q? rAOC Ao?o ?cFs??T .3 1 n _ x ?J (O IFS Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 1:19 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Tim A. Johnson; Amy Wall Subject: FLD2006-05029 - 100 Park Place Blvd. S. SitePlan.pdf Attached is a reduced copy of Sheet 1 of 7 of the survey. I will deliver printed copies, along with other supplemental info. by 9:00 a.m. Tuesday. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax (727) 462-0365 <<SitePlan.pdf>> 1 MEMO= HGNRY Sr£ICN 9T.3 .: y t.. ?- ? mmLms?u?aJaaos• nwAwrrmr w-.?fPiw~it ?w •- . Nwws ?Mw ? na+y-O.r ew. n•m ?>m rY W4wr.?? ti r, DREW STREET teb $ a SHEET 2 na '.w^.'.'ub.e ? ? ^• b e.remua.ro.awrmbawr.aab..]boemnaoo m.xs w-rzti bdRrpbd b/q • AQdIwI.nAav d M 6M d fWb4 mr W Ib b G Who TAY 1awln r7 p'W Raw-VEFK LLCP.LW MbnarArn lb.retwrrA4C. Crwel6ra4 uYIM h tmaM rewe]Y u hiMwWArM'r9?ul. «d.wea/rlerw s nnTWnt 1bWnmdanraAfen /eynMMt McArTrwrfr-rrreY MdMrm frl.Jalbnb?f.RbG1E1M!\Nh t dRdbbb W arMA/ raYFCMp.baR b MCOOn }Tltlr.liallb abAAM m/.Ap.04 M/tOlna7blN ArNaIY/MLbd. aYWY errere+' 1. f!rL rJOrL1y M10p 3n'rRYp el afhtmO+o?YirnabWODYb/IbplemnfbA[TAgL6h LN bAr }](.1f]}44?141rd1/f?T NfArAael. PsW bebirl?? /C%bd• 'TA AbM rdAGCrmdhblYlr Md/YdNa+rBaoaa. v.dw'ynflNMrsK.N e/oL.W DsWlerwrAh/eenMww7swa-?b.Yd.ar Mavwrabn'ABadM .b. Pncdrrd.v.. tl/ ! r re.nmM town M erRnelpbbwrm.raryMdaY] ra.ne.r.r W....n Mron ee/fnYeli eea+vpnM reeBrA+Rrtl h/6rM Mnwb r M RdMP4rbAPPr e4dhIBPN+IroA+breb d+GtA w(e/e]Mbnv..m«w k419P.9'vM1 Lwb>Yi]f rPee M RgIdPIN.H v/end/eNarTrK Ia4tl1/Bn +nnrA MdewnYm.YarV M wt)eliw'Y'^. '4 .4oer.rr?++rY.o.tasbuBl. aa7+w,e..a aw+. r»a h cl++w m m....ce mMlwprb M+Wh'}PR'gOL Mewleellllr M.Rf1R]. bp+YV nRrb.S1WbY eeb baorlbMalY/d4brM,n/.wwwLband iNpep.y/Mrron Nwu..yH mEry4w4rh Mlrl mfnihihA il/LVMdYInp•w.mRdrr MrLWygrAIY >rbnlBr I111a1Y.1+rlYGpp+tlen//e11Wbb.Ydlefb'daM?+dh aN Blvm?m:MYBL .Ht d?/TWMM.uabbNbn.M'fWbQbl.cNbdPAIOmWe?rA-T wMMatca»dMbp'/rpepwybs. mIMMm.rrmwro-. wrM erM?P?s nTn?id..?E 4• M ti.o..c? rvDmbM.Em? h1 wMWUbrd/m M rr?lwdRd w4bn r b19>wud.zw.b WS WWI V61 ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC RuSe•1Iw 36.J6• ihb utrTbrAd+WOBetbbtlarybMLWNVOdeebMNwudB ' dbf4'1nrM hw.yYtnnrA'7 ' lraebbCadrbrhRn arbPemu. LLe . nr eisb h.bau ra7.e] M l MRbl r Re /r nR] o.ehrEnEeb epmLwPeneaA b weem+enr rM a ' fi.M Rewwr •Vef K LLC ? irlowf.srEerybuhTMMM?eW/bNMwyvbwl]aYwrpnpw bAm•reYPlM a?laTAn.prN+eba ? p-OJ15•+Y PROPenrvA00uESa Avaa1• R-s1D.w' CBPrvRIAw enAnrdsmn Cmvx,m..R .maB S g r [DJ Y, O SHEET 3 g 14.85 ACRES .ar LOT 3j O ; v r 9? ?savue.Bw SHEET 4 fcns AMC wo ITD. +wammrn/ 4,11 4 Q /gam v raLN/yI/al/?R AVND Np laE (LICE Li NOlW 39 4.11 L: uvJeu +1.00 LJ seJro+u 47.ox L4 R7su J5 41x1 L6 n7rzs Je . / Le L] Mel'J153 SI.11 R5B-JB+B Ol.ea , LOT 1 6A susGr LLKY+ LM9 L 11 ' .p-rsrB's7 SHEET 7 R.JGS.dt• N?YP ?? \?ARG 4 InIq.MILOC J y?B.yt i Jy J w,w w ` Y Qp SHEET 6 12.14 ACRES ';• LOT 2 s SHEETS c? sesrsar a».1 M1 y'"4 y+a /? ,po aooomxe m.Pro.bbmbeb RLem.x ?? M1t ?o Y rroTPs AIYIb+rYaarre/YriNnnJrrTrdA/4rh A M1 J9n AA'+mnr BNRdAM 6lnmarr/ramer2lpl d IDD• 207. J00• a/oALassuavnarrceoARras Soue. I ?roe• . PARCEL I:(euRBEYm) )re?•v+a r3aaM?were? w marn.?bur/ob ~.?w?w? .m. ?.? ?ed.+er rno.a aEaALDesewPrcwfoRe.LSOln+rvAwcElae . PARCEL M ($MOM WTSIAIVEYED) '. Abw W M w/w?l.e bM LwM dHreb r r ime b M arbh Sbmrw.• W.w.M'b-'b"t, rwmdetJabwyrt+W,bgIHrR/end+eeaLlD/,pbBpLdNpcpbremrrd Cwbec 7b4B.aY+rrseva MbMUS+vMOr4Ma' PARCfl.1R(ARrv WTSOMTYED) NarAWrn LbfedewnYN bHLrwbdP.NlrrwOYhbr-errpw?wdnendMJey)L t/la b OlLW R/mb etvA 10(73 Pp/AII,dNPNLtfrad+d Nr/tl Caiq: fb[b Orrbtl reeuMYLMmLNabWre.fARRMCF SUn FASFABR` A? dAMyh/wRM eldbt rr; rordpz/sLaL1/r/+re FieLPhYr LYb/rE'•]Arib.vesb/ y96luydrmpMrAfri et»ar MSWRaI.c?d1elL e]DRZaPNI11YA/GL LIY.r oARRPLACa.roreW hMere rDR 0//r IBN n, dM ppb rBUrmrdnwu Delf+x PIRbr M•b.+mv M Irarlly/eHgw d PMPYU emr»a rnmW/h06Ywmlh/r+MIL oBw 40L dMPueb?.mddPBYIr 44v /, f Wit ee?I JOCMOO•eKbeh00MLMR.MM9rtl MYMM.dMI'A? RaI? P8N ILrt b M[OArIt N-naa?091110'Erfba]m Yet Drs RRT APREPhY.t b ia3M Mnro/b0?]0'ee00'FUL bA.Nb+ERm Ab/i 6D•e7Etl• 15x1. b60]hKMndrb0re0>ei0' eat b11.e/brb MeaNeenW]M drbl/ra'ers Ym/rbew.wbnroyM 9erL IB'0]De'e/IL baaWAY/b MPOSTTWeeeBWWL , JWD fDA'D fi/efLEN7 ND. L YSIL)MM AL1rSURVeYE7lJ A? dMyYV wbal e+ao/7.TbrRehsmq neof feEM Abetl ovAy.R4bA r/ . pr/RM7d.BVbtltlhLne ' OOAIIIBT.6r MealRaltmr WWA eRY4ANRWLiCe.MC PAI1nRAQLrir,YdYh Pw emA /BR PawB 10.1ydMpA/D/BYd/dPbrr Lbvq: tArAKMS/brMh'+/eRryAdRY+AI M dPMpr/ IgAwra rrnorltlhdMlRbbd+fluF/f14PP+B4 dMbpbnmrl d PhW LUO/R. PbM eMeei1e00•Wrtbtleee+IbMPoNfCICCPYMi4 MrssiLV ' rpl/d U'r3T, r x?.o?ma??..?1.•y.?bv?»•?ed..?ba...??.im ai}m?omwifwr bMRwM.t bRRIµYd4eD.RArr N/ NatlEr'LV Arb J]SPlr Rbll b4Rl+I Mbenrbpd/rR Mn// Ibb4eVIY7'hY4b QD)AMb/ /eebpRrlonYta+aY b M/bbert Mrlr WMabI//by M redrbbwr bMb/IElbdltlLOeArr, /eRNRIpbdlJYl'Jr: rbebDeld4eLM AM mild der/q Alsbe]VOITEM b4g11Mb/pb/dbeq/lerC MrslbBr J/AOPGrLb M}1 AMlMa Rvb 14ROp IN+t bKI]A1t MrsMRIr/PRD1T bL(bllrefwtfav /ORI eYelK NLL b1)AB MI4M earuyEar4ryMd+1ltd Ib Nb/ rbAl rbeMrlyeeWbY On.IbIrOP/et1•NYR, b/aee b.eMrf rorb eY61I/'erL b W.fI WLMnwhlr eswLw Elr, biTJ.WMprre•YMIprYbRliwyeMO/7Lb, SMAD/W MYR b i),W ARCMna Nrr9•efe0'6K beaep.eero ewlsevetvhLLb7Qe0Y/ebR.n a.r1r•az?ELL b 13W /M; /rem3RIr SBS6W MLL b5te/ebe MlseM e/'aT/P lrLb I6W AMbM POHr Cf eEf./MMD R11P.0 b/Ie/bl AOLYD N IOmI 1MwL >l? o1-ISnI rr/ Yit r1 ue Iryl uw c.?YIA ALTAiACSM LWD 7l1LE SURD FOR: z swren..ibrmnn..?n..4M/wam.rrYU...r.db.d.wdrArowa. e a PARK ISLE COHDOMMIUM DEYELOPMENI, LLC rbMmwb ..x RR PIAGE elec. a% z 7MP.?.Iq.nm.ImMn.,.r+MPV/.naw rr .AWewl..dn...}rae.r.bbrbaR. sl/ua e.Y.MeprrrwMparrrrrs • . ? b nc+ rmrrwRerw.r . ' BNamlPbbbbmrbWprysnby a TfdgEwJ Orel Or MAnMnEtl4rb+BeaIMMUM+tllb+rymYUbndW ro AnwNNGrymaR ,ts{1 oCe MvvYA 0. eAm/rursn urwpbadhlpPrrrribrolrAwer+r/11fh/pdm R.Mbwa rAW ML JY MbRf+d ?? ,19 IL im 7w Ur an a RbxRn rYeRlr..rmm,.nrYd.,ur;r.dr.•w.rrrnr,.rYd ' V ---_ .r. .r •? r? 9. MQMMwA MMMm/ebM ebERlwBOre/bbbMpBbir WenYAMbrrTwT/OMrrdMNtl b+.Y +WLeb.h PG. W-1?7e J71 w I y b. bRam YeWAe,pghtnpsarmlrlmDw.npgvrlebimn rwy.Mbeh MnbmvlW eYiwn u& 7/11/05 ° 05-1276 /err/d0.danr+. mW tllYw,hran; dlnrlAVY+Ireen Yrl m+MMAsandM bipreanrR/env CW. ;; 0.5-I?l6.OMt) 1 r 7 U- 0 CITY OF CLORRWATER ClearWater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. COM May 30, 2006 Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757-1368 RE: FLD2006-05029 -- 100 PARK PLACE BLVD S -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-05029. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide a reduced copy (8.5"x11 ") of Sheet 1 of 7 of the survey (for CDB presentation purposes). 2. Photographs of the existing signs have been submitted, however, they are not indicated as to where these signs are located (including setbacks), are not dimensioned as to height, width, sign area, etc. Since this is a Termination request, and Section 6-109.C requires any nonconforming sign to be brought into conformity or be terminated, and since the Comprehensive Sign Program is not available to attached dwelling projects, need to provide the location of the sign photographs submitted, as well as all dimensional requirements. If the sign(s) are too close to property lines (setbacks) or too large (height or sign area), need to include as part of the Termination request. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 9:00 am on Tuesday, June 6, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, M. W && Wa Wells yn Planner III Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2006-05029 - 100 PARK PLACE BLVD S 10 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 4:14 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2006-05029, 100 & 101 S. Park Place Blvd. Jayne - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above project. The original is being mailed. Wayne Y ?M?L letter of completeness 5.30.. s • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 6:22 PM To: Moses, Brenda Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2006-05029 - 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Brenda - I would appreciate it if could you provide me with the information from the meeting so that I can prepare the Development Order. Thanks. Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:58 PM To: Moses, Brenda Subject: FLD2006-05029 - 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Brenda - I will be preparing a Development Order for the above referenced case that was approved (all four parts) by the CDB today. Since I put Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the Development Order, could you send me what they said regarding the last part of this case (that we recommended denial of)? Also, they added a new Condition #2 that 1 didn't write down. Could you send me this new condition? Finally, remember that they changed the 60 days to 90 days in Condition #1 when you are doing your minutes. Thanks. Wayne 9 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 5:58 PM To: Moses, Brenda Subject: FLD2006-05029 -100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Brenda - I will be preparing a Development Order for the above referenced case that was approved (all four parts) by the CDB today. Since I put Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in the Development Order, could you send me what they said regarding the last part of this case (that we recommended denial of)? Also, they added a new Condition #2 that I didn't write down. Could you send me this new condition? Finally, remember that they changed the 60 days to 90 days in Condition #1 when you are doing your minutes. Thanks. Wayne A -.,..... . .K 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:36 AM To: 'stevew@jpfirm.com' Cc: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Wells, Wayne; 'ggrimes@hwhlaw.com' Subject: FW: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 Importance: High have reviewed Section 1-106 and 6-109 as well as the variance application materials. I am not inclined to advise the staff that it should change its recommendation, as I believe that the CDB may impose conditions upon granting the termination of nonconformity which conditions include removal of the sign. The applicant may therefore make its argument to the CDB. Leslie Dougall-Sides -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 3:03 PM To: 'stevew@jpfirm.com' Subject: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 Importance: High -----Original Message----- From: Steven A. Williamson Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:25 PM To: 'Pam.Akin@myClearwater.com' Subject: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 I was just forwarded your e-mail below by Pam. Can you advise which Code Section is referenced by "the attached code section"? No code section was attached to the e-mail I received. I will review the matter and try to get back to you prior to the meeting tomorrow. Leslie Dougall-Sides Pam, the above case will go before the CDB on October 17th. Staff is supportive, with one exception. The one exception relates to the Park Isle monument sign on Gulf-to-Bay (across from Target). The sign is located on City right-of-way, which is not allowed under the current code (was not allowed under prior Code unless approved by Council). Ed obtained a variance from the City Council in 1997 to allow for the sign to be constructed (SV#97-10). The application that will be heard next week is to terminate non-conforming status. We have two issues. One, the property owner was previously granted a variance to allow the sign, and two, the property the sign is on is not on the property subject to the application. It is an off-site sign located on city right-of-way. The attached code section seems to address the issue of a previously granted variance. It is our contention that the sign can legally remain on the right-of-way property and is subject to the conditions of the previously granted variance. Can you help shed some light on this issue. I would like to resolve this prior to the CDB hearing, if possible. Steven A. Williamson, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street d - tV, • • Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 (phone) 727-441-8617 (fax) It 0 0 Wells, Wayne- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:48 PM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Cc: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 We put a condition on it to go away. However, certainly let me know if this is not a winnable battle given the history which he is correct on. We'll amend the conditions. Wayne will get you the information you need. michael -----Original Message----- From: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:38 PM To: Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 Please advise of Planning's position re sign referenced below and fax me any relevant documents such as the variance referenced, if you have a copy. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Akin, Pam Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 2:23 PM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie Subject: FW: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 Pamela Akin, City Attorney 112 S. Osceola Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 727 562-4010 -----Original Message----- From: Steven A. Williamson [mailto:stevew@jpfirm.com] Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 7:54 AM To: Akin, Pam Subject: RE: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 Pam, I was just following up on the below email. If this email should be directed to someone else, please let me know. Steven A. Williamson, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 (phone) 727-441-8617 (fax) Esquire Ruppel & Burns, LLP -----Original Message----- From: Steven A. Williamson Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 2:25 PM To: 'Pam.Akin@myClearwater.com' Subject: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 1 Pam, the above case will go before the CDB on October 17th. Staff is supportive, with one exception. The one exception relates to the Park Isle monument sign on Gulf-to-Bay (across from Target). The sign is located on City right-of-way, which is not allowed under the current code (was not allowed under prior code unless approved by Council). Ed obtained a variance from the City Council in 1997 to allow for the sign to be constructed (SV#97-10). The application that will be heard next week is to terminate non-conforming status. We have two issues. One, the property owner was previously granted a variance to allow the sign, and two, the property the sign is on is not on the property subject to the application. It is an off-site sign located on city right-of-way. The attached code section seems to address the issue of a previously granted variance. It is our contention that the sign can legally remain on the right-of-way property and is subject to the conditions of the previously granted variance. Can you help shed some light on this issue. I would like to resolve this prior to the CDB hearing, if possible. Steven A. Williamson, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 (phone) 727-441-8617 (fax) -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 10:25 AM To: Steven A. Williamson Subject: Park Isle - FLD2006-05029 2 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: -75 lo 'I-- `?' 021 Phone: _ -(4 2 - Jr- O 1 0 FROM: W r"L _ Vj Q 1 J Phone: to L- 4J104 - DATE:_ J-R ) I to I 10 co RE:F-L 17 7-00 b - 0 ,S o z-9 MESSAGE: J--ki c ems, ., e-3-4-P-A - v ar- e.?c 2 S V Q1 ? - NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 3 Oct. 16 2006 03:09PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 95624021 Oct.16 03:05PM 04'08 SND 13 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL,I- P-FAX (435-7329). • • ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: October 17, 2006 Case Number: FLD2006-05029 Agenda Item: D2 Owner/ Applicant: Park Isle Condominium Development, LLC Representative: Timothy A. Johnson Esq. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Address: 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces), (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted) and (4) to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, under the provisions of Section 6- 109.C. CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C), Office (O) and Preservation (P) Districts CURRENT FUTURE LAND Residential/Office/Retail (R/O/R), Residential/Office General (R/OG) USE CATEGORY: and Preservation (P) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: 390 attached dwellings Proposed Use: 390 attached dwellings EXISTING North: Medium Density Residential (MDR); Attached dwellings; SURROUNDING ZONING Industrial, Research and Technology Manufacturing AND USES: (IRT) Districts South: Commercial (C) District Offices East: Industrial, Research and Technology Manufacturing; (IRT); Office (O); Mobile Home Park Offices; Mobile Home (MHP) Districts Park West: Commercial (C); Medium High Density Retail sales and Residential (MHDR); Institutional (I) services; Offices; Districts Attached dwellings; Water pumping station Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 FLD2006-05029 - Page 1 of 6 0 0 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 26.99 acres is located on both sides of Park Place Boulevard, south of Drew Street and north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard. The majority of the property on the west side of Park Place Boulevard (100 Park Place Boulevard) is zoned Office (O) District, with only a small portion on the south side zoned Commercial (C) District. The majority of the property on the east side of Park Place Boulevard (101 Park Place Boulevard) is zoned Commercial (C) District, with the northern portion zoned Office (O) District and the wetland/pond zoned Preservation (P) District. The property is part of the Park Place DRI and was permitted to be developed with a maximum of 394 dwelling units under a land use conversion provision under the DRI. The property was developed in 1998 with a total of 390 attached dwelling units. Properties to the north are zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District (across Drew Street) and Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District and developed respectively with attached dwellings and manufacturing (Bausch & Lomb). The properties to the south, also within the Park Place DRI, are zoned Commercial (C) District and are developed with office uses. The properties to the east are zoned Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT), Office (O) and Mobile Home Park (MHP) Districts and are respectively developed with manufacturing (Bausch & Lomb), offices and a mobile home park. Properties to the west are zoned Commercial (C), Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) and Institutional (I) Districts and are respectively developed with retail sales and services (shopping center), offices, attached dwellings and a water pumping station. Development Proposal: Termination of Status of Nonconformity: The development proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces), (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted) and (4) to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet. The criteria for termination of status of nonconformity, as per Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code and outlined in the table below, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off-street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory uses/structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202.D of the X Community Development Code shall be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established X in Section 3-1202.E of the Community Development Code. Inconsistent 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory X use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to X satisfv the reouirements of this section. The Commercial and Office Districts do not allow attached dwellings as a permitted use, therefore, the existing attached dwellings are a nonconforming use. The applicant has converted the apartments to condominiums and desires the attached dwellings to be a conforming use (rather than nonconforming Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 FLD2006-05029 - Page 2 of 6 • • use). The applicant discussed with the Planning Department the option of amending the land use category to the Residential Medium (RM) classification, but it was determined that such an amendment would not produce the same or greater number of dwelling units based on maximum density as what exists on the property today. The Planning Department was not willing to commit to the Residential High (RH) classification due to much higher permitted density, traffic impacts and issues with the DRI. Since there is no desire to construct additional dwelling units, but to simply have a Code conforming use, it was determined that the Termination of Status of Nonconformity was the most viable option to the applicant. The Park Isle complex is well designed, landscaped and maintained. Staff does not object to the Termination of the attached dwelling use status. Approval of the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for use will allow the reconstruction of dwellings in the event of a loss or damage of 50 percent or more of the value of the buildings. During the review of this request, it was determined that the complex did not meet the current requirements to have an accessible handicap path to the sidewalks within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way and within the complex to access this accessible path and common facilities (pools, clubhouse, etc.). The applicant has presented plans to install sidewalks to accomplish such handicap accessibility, which will need to be included as a condition of approval. Such sidewalk installation will need to be installed in a manner to ensure limited tree impacts. The second part to this Termination request is to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces). This project was approved and constructed when parking ratios were less than the current requirement of two parking spaces per unit. While it is indicated that the currently provided parking ratio is 1.77 parking spaces per unit, reality is that there is additional parking on-site, but not as what is considered legal parking by Code provisions. There are detached parking garages, providing enclosed parking for 24 vehicles, located throughout the residential complex (both sides of the Park Place Boulevard) that is in front of surface, open parking. Since stacked parking is not permitted by our current Code, these "two" parking spaces only count as one space. Such a parking arrangement is close to that at a detached dwelling with a one-car garage and one space in the driveway. Parking in the surface space in front of the garage space is limited to the same tenant. Also, while not indicated nor counted as parking spaces on the site plan, outside of garage parking within each residential building there is sufficient area outside the garages to accommodate additional parking. There does not appear to be any known issues of inadequate parking for this development. Staff does not object to this portion of the Termination request. The third part to this Termination request is to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted). These signs are at the east and west development entrances on Park Place Boulevard. These signs are attractively designed as part of a decorative entrance feature between entrance and exit gates and were constructed pursuant to approved permits and Code provisions applicable at that time. The signs are attached to walls that are 11 feet high at their highest point and as such are treated as monument signs. Current Code provisions only permit the monument signs (wall) to be a maximum of six feet high. These monument signs (walls) are not located close to the front property line, whereas the western wall/sign is over 80 feet and the eastern wall/sign is over 70 feet from the front property lines of Park Place Boulevard. While these signs are almost double the permitted sign area by current Code, the signs are consistent with the scale of the entrance features they are attached to and their sign area is in context to their location over 70 feet each from the front property lines. Staff does not object to this portion of the Termination request. The last part of this Termination request is to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet. The City Commission approved the existing sign on August 21, 1997, as a variance to allow a second freestanding sign within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way (Case #SV 97-10). City Commission Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 FLD2006-05029 - Page 3 of 6 • • policy in effect at that time prohibited subdivision monuments within public right-of-way. At that time in 1997, it was City Staff's preference to have the existing multi-tenant sign modified to include signage for the apartment complex, but the applicant could not obtain agreement from the party controlling the sign to modify that sign. Current Code Section 3-1803.L lists this existing sign as a prohibited sign. Staff supports the reduction of sign clutter, especially those listed as prohibited signs, in accordance with a purpose of the Sign Section (Section 3-1802.C), which states "Lessen hazardous situations, confusion and visual clutter caused by proliferation, improper placement, illumination, animation and excessive height, area and bulk of signs which compete for the attention of pedestrian and vehicular traffic." Staff does not support this portion of the Termination request and recommends removal of such sign within 30 days of CDB action, with an appropriate demolition permit. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code: Consistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of June 29, 2006, and deemed the development proposal to be sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: . The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. 5SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 26.99 acre subject property is located on both sides of Park Place Boulevard, south of Drew Street and north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard; 2. That the majority of the property on the west side of Park Place Boulevard (100 Park Place Boulevard) is zoned Office (O) District, with only a small portion on the south side zoned Commercial (C) District; 3. That the majority of the property on the east side of Park Place Boulevard (101 Park Place Boulevard) is zoned Commercial (C) District, with the northern portion zoned Office (O) District and the wetland/pond zoned Preservation (P) District; 4. That the property was developed in 1998 with a total of 390 attached dwelling units; Community Development Board -October 17, 2006 FLD2006-05029 -Page 4 of 6 0 • 5. That the Commercial and Office Districts do not allow attached dwellings as a permitted use, therefore, the existing attached dwellings are a nonconforming use; 6. That approval of the request will allow the reconstruction of dwellings in the event of a loss or damage of 50 percent or more of the value of the buildings; 7. That there is no desire to construct additional dwelling units, but to simply have a Code conforming use; 8. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; 9. That currently a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces) exists, where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces). There does not appear to be any known issues of inadequate parking for this development; 10. That two multi-family development signs, considered monument signs, exist (one at each entrance) at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted); 11. That these on-site monument signs are consistent with the scale of the entrance features they are attached to and their sign area is in context to their location over 70 feet each from the front property lines; 12. That a sign exists within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard at a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, which was permitted by a variance in 1997 to be constructed; 13. That the sign within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard near Gulf to Bay Boulevard is listed as a prohibited sign under Section 3-1806.L; 14. That the prohibited sign within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard near Gulf to Bay Boulevard does not comply with a purpose of the Sign Section 3-1802.C, which states "Lessen hazardous situations, confusion and visual clutter caused by proliferation, improper placement, illumination, animation and excessive height, area and bulk of signs which compete for the attention of pedestrian and vehicular traffic"; and 15. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code, except as it relates to the Termination of the prohibited sign within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way; and 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces) and (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted), under the provisions of Section 6-109.C, with the conditions listed below. Based upon the above, the Planning Department recommends DENIAL of that portion of the Flexible Development application for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C. Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 FLD2006-05029 - Page 5 of 6 0 0 Conditions of Approval: 1. That, within 60 days of CDB approval, an application be submitted for building permits to construct handicap sidewalk access between building, common facilities and the public sidewalk within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way, in a location and manner acceptable to the Engineering and Planning Departments, including the submission of a tree survey to minimize tree impacts; and 2. That, within 30 days of CDB approval, the existing prohibited sign within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way (close to Gulf to Bay Boulevard) be removed with an appropriate demolition permit. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: rj - ?IeA Wayne M. ells, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Location Map ? Aerial Map ? Zoning Map ? Existing Surrounding Uses Map ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIPark Place Blvd 100 & 101 Park Isle Condominiums (C, 0& P) - 10.17.06 CDB - WWIPark Place 100& 101 Staff Report.doc Community Development Board - October 17, 2006 FLD2006-05029 - Page 6 of 6 i • O? owEWaaD sr ? o° a a APPLEWOOD LL z? o 8 m ? ?c 3 ?a O °o u 4 D ST 0 ¢ WHIII.WN ST O w ? CHANGER ST yO SHEL EY ST E-1, *?:1 O? PROJECT SITE B 0 +oL ti S5 E 7--. De BAY BLVD J RD *77 ul w I. SENILE 6LVD Location Map Park Isle Condominium Case: Owner: Development, LLC Site: 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Property Size(Acres): PIN: Atlas Page: FLD2006-05029 26.99 acres 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 291 A • 0 ' ' R r r 1 J H7 P ? h r _ s 1 1 - .s_? ? y.. y?i1 - ` r ? 1 1 J Aerial Map Owner: Park Isle Condominium Case: FLD2006-05029 D evelopment, LLC Site: 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 26.99 acres PIN: 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 Atlas Page: 291 A 0 0 320 310 OS/ l? 300 230 DR o I O cV 220 240 5 Ac 210 200 N N C i$ t a f s 21421 BERMUDA O 21415 2621 MHP 16,38 A.. 9 r1 Op a N 21411 W IRT y ? N 91yVN / OD ? 00 `1 a./ ¦ O 2515 O ' 1 3Y `V A R 4'4.1 ? rye' 6y I yQ' ?, C16 •5640 O 2630 C n: MHDR 2606 O T ?g P y LEEWARD ISLE SB7 A, 7 re QS^4 0 a O f , O 8 n BBt A.. ?4 pO^ E:) Q C tY y r n a 9 x.18 Acp ? 4 „ 510 A Q ???1 'C O +x 6 a 259 A- r 22t 4jo ? X11 "'ice ?`S O E A O 2 - 0 ? • 510 A.. 375 6 r 4?0 oasn Zoning Map Owner. Park Isle Condominium Case: FLD2006-05029 Development, LLC Site: 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 26.99 acres 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 PIN: 17129/16/85546/000/0030 Atlas Page: 291A 0 0 N 320 310 A?ache# Attac?d 3 Living Assisted (D V t Dwegings I Dwellinge' acan Ce.ntPr N 210 200 0 p N N N ° DREW ST 21421 N 3 BERMUDA Retail Sales N °. Z and Se l"ces 0 2621 t- TRINIDAD TRL y 18.38 A.. 21411 o a' Z (2~ M nnr co Y 2615 k 100 ?O JV W ry? Manufacturing z A?: yQ j to Nobile ? Q ome p ? ° Mobile ''° A. QPark Home O 2606 Park It Q Government N y LEEWARD ISLE 667 Ac Use 4>00 0 ? rg `? 7 O 7-Y 1 s Tfr - BB, Acm f ?? ^O* ti 40 Q Off , -w fices O ices 4 6?B A A-? 47p A 4?Oirices Of ices Ac,° Offices 87613 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Park Isle Condominium Case: FLD2006-05029 Development, LLC Site: 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 26.99 acres 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 PIN: 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 Atlas Page: 291 A 100 & 101 Park Place Blvd. FLD2006-05029 s. J i View of a typical residential building in the condominium complex gi? View of nonconforming prohibited sign at Gulf to Bay Boulevard and Park Place Boulevard View of a typical residential building in the View of a typical detached garage building within the condominium complex View of nonconforming signage at entrance at 101 Park Place Boulevard 40 Land Resource Condition 1* , Conditions Associated With FLD2006-05029 100 PARK PLACE BLVD S Rick Albee 06/20/2006 6/20/06-To accommodate the Engineering Department's request for sidewalks, submit a tree Not Met survey (with canopies) and, to insure limited tree impacts, place a note on the plans to place the walks "on grade" under the canopies of the trees. Provide prior to building permit. 9/13/06-Insure that a updated tree survey is submitted with the building permit application. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4741 727-562-4504 06/26/2006 8/14/06 - WW Not Met Applicant agrees to remove these signs. 6/26/06 - WW Site inspection reveals there is additional freestanding signage in the form of two banners each attached to four light poles on both sides of the entrances on both sides of Park Place Blvd. Records do not indicate any permits for these signs. Please remove these signs. Print Date: 10/08/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2006-05029 - 100 Park Place Blvd. Wayne, All engineering issues addressed. Rick Albee was not in the meeting when we laid out sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. He may still need to review sidewalk locations. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater..com Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 3:01 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Kurleman, Scott Subject: FW: Resubmittal for the October 17, 2006 Meeting for CDB FYI Sherry L Watkins Planning Department Administrative Analyst (727) 562-4582 shei-nj.watkins@mycleanvater.com -----Original Message----- From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:53 PM To: Elliott, Gayle; DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittal for the October 17, 2006 Meeting for CDB 18746 US 19 N- Conditions met. 100 Park Place- Updated conditions. 1721 Gulf to Bay- Updated conditions. 622 Lembo-No Issues -----Original Message----- From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 2:46 PM To: DRC Members Subject: FW: Resubmittal for the October 17, 2006 Meeting for CDB Importance: High added to meeting please review FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Circle Planner: Scott Kurleman -----Original Message----- From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:13 AM To: DRC Distribution List Subject: Resubmittal for the October 17, 2006 Meeting for CDB DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the October, 17, 2006 CDB meeting: FLD2006-07043 - 18746 US Hwy 19 N - Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2006-05029 - 100 Park Place Blvd. Planner: Wayne Wells FLD2006-07044 - 1721 Gulf to Bay Blvd Planner: Wayne Wells t • • I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for CDB mailout). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have cases reviewed, if possibe by 12:pm on, September 12, 2006 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:55 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Elbo, Bennett Subject: FLD2006-05029 - 100 Park Place Blvd S Wayne, The Traffic comments regarding are not addressed on the plans. A meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, 8/16 @ 1:00 pm to discuss this issue. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice a( MyClearwater..com • • Wells, Wayne From: Elliott, Gayle Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 4:34 PM To: DRC Members Subject: Resubmittal for 9-19-06 Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the 9-19-2006 meeting: FLD2006-02011 - 146 Brightwater Drive: FLD2006-06034 - 622 Lembo Cir: FLD2006-04024 - 1532 S Highland FLD2006-02009 - 490 Mandalay Ave FLD2006-05029 - 100 Park Place Blvd S ANX2006-07025 - 1415 Regal Rd ANX2006-06020 - 1960 E Skyline Dr ANX2006-06022 - 3060 Allen Ave ANX2006-06023 - 2727 Daniel St ANX2006-06024 - 2295 McMullen Booth ANX2006-05018 - 109 McMullen Booth ANX2006-06021 1606 Scott Street ANX2006-05015 1321 Woodbine Street Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Scott Kurleman Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Wayne Wells Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Cky Ready Planner: Mike Reynolds Planner: Mike Reynolds Planner: Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (Please do not take it or any of the other copies as they are needed for the CDB members) Please review your comments/conditions for this cases in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, August 15, 2006. Gayle Elliott • r? Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 2:29 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2006-05029 In aerial.doc existing.doc FLD Map request location.doc zone.doc form.doc Sam Kambourolias GIS Tech. (727) 562-4769 www.myclearwater.com 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 5:49 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Sam - Attached is a map request for Case FLD2006-05029 for the property at 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne FLD Map request form.doc 0 0 Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FLD2006-05029 Date Requested: July 16, 2006 Date Requested for (date): July 31, 2006 Maps Requested X? Location Map X? Aerial Map ` X? Zoning Map X? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineering X? Legal Description X? Survey X? Map With Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: I Park Isle Condominium I Case: FLD2006-05029 Development, LLC Site: 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Si pert es): 26.99 acres PIN: 17/29/16/85546/000/0020 i 17/29/16/85546/000/0030 Atlas Page: 291 A FLPL006 ._281B rDzl 101 ? 282A 2828 ------------ ---------------- CITY OF CLEARWATER ez sa AND VICINITY DREW ` (y • PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA re',e5 PREPARED BY STREET 9 yE eleae • • --.--._........_.........._., 1 to ,a • 260 J PUBLIC A'ORNCIN [RM?NQSTRAIEION a , ......-: i i I I ' H F A. lp° S. MKtle Ave., Clearwater. FL 33756 11/01 I ------{t_______- I i n4tr zss `_ Ph, (727)762-4750. Fa.: (727)526-4755 '?ss69... ror , I r ruse I - S ! sass-u iii.-337 , ~'"'?• t?`) 265 nltp;//www.aNar.oler-n,cam u /C Y-Deportmmla/pudlc waMS/englneal ie t' ' 8 it 267 ; DIaCIalmer; i' 1 2B 268 Pubnc brarmoiipt solo ix furnlxhe0 by the City of aeOrwaUr , -15 1 i i „) J p Pudic Works Adminlxtralbn ineerln i AU eddnnss eff U.S. It 1 /Eng g. and u t be .,C,pled h 8 a ....................................i ', r and u "d l 4 269 sed Is y to recipient :th the understanding that the data a s I 22/07 y prY \,) i? f?-?-7 recNved eras <aleatea row the Purpax. of developing o 9raphlc I i ??^^ff I T i 270 Inlrostructure inventory. As such, the City of Clearwater PWA/E mak40 no ra anlNs, e>yNSxld or Implisd, ncwning the easel I .A I tIr„ i •' I LLL r? iuy?y` 271 accuracy, carndeteness, reliability. or suitat, of this data far any er particular vxe. Furthermore, the City of Clearwater i ---''-"""""--"---'--------------------------- ' i ..._._.. ................ I ' ---'- I 272 or miPWA/Esuse a40umes of n sucho doIiateb.dly whalsoeVer ossocloted with the use .. .-- ............ ............. .......... _ --•-._.- ...........: ?? r '_______ I , r p _____________ __ I,y • ??c l NOTF. _:.....; j ._..... ; I ------ ,:• C) , ,t {A(U r..-•11 This Atlas page is subject to periodic changes. naool R 'O i I -- i ------------- t '1 r-I •S pIS "? '? ? .? f"j f- For Inf-atlpn about 101401 r WsIms please call PWA/E er R I , i , ......._.. r `. visit our Web iie. ,. , t...._ ........... .....J ..__...... 1 I ...,N-,73 i ' . r- LOT 1 12/0 ____________________ _- l ,. I, i,oa-,o7; 1 n3-n ` i n-;' `,n-ne ..-, C ,,•C e? P sear( . ; I I ............ I ? i ............s ....... ' R. -_._... ? i i'„t i • ,;'• C 23 2 I '^' t 'k• :?i R E? 5? i?1 !? %i ? Y C 24 i :.... ..G`E I ...? l `Tr? •.?`'?t .y.? 1 4 ?? ?. __.. ... ... Y ....... _ 7'' < s : NE pf... C1j. E K i. c pRX ',?° cup l 25 „ ,S,_,SS I f ' so 4 26 etol<a -- o too zoo aoo soo 6 l'' ,s3-tai .. SLRtYe _-._*i' 3_LLLZ__ _'...1 `t.-3v-? TG` I °i i.._ sa,s? ?iiI....I...i iii f ?I? oaf LOT 3 SCALE: _ cm91?zFE_ 27 I -?YIPfI ;a; ?; 4?`•. ,.r?' --- 29 a - --------"- '---... - ----- -) ?k?, r ti'}?,? 3o LEGEND: !!a $^ 22/03 ,\?? •.. (S?, 31 „ x :naa ? ; , 32 m asr,ea _-- --- 3 O BLOCK NUMBER m ' •- s"aese-io FO i ........? ; `! ?\: ill J31-i ! CND 1234 LOT ADDRESS N Y 'D Nlr 13 C13 I rron '`? j / ;Zi'>, CITY LIMITS LINE I hloai ' 'Pi :?`de '-. i :?'?•f : l 0 9 ?I r I II?II?III??;i} , SHADED AREA -PROPERTY i rt I 2 f?\?? U. • 3/03 r y r oT ? / • (. I I Il +?I ?I ll :,y yc m rear! 23/01 NJ III I';t {; OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS I µ r 23rW d'.CA•f2;(, 1'•\ „O k'• '' `'e ??IIiI) I il, 23/017 C \)a 'Pf'? ^ C ?' I'? I'IIjjil AGREEMENT TO ANNEX om ILL pre •e ,?' c• 1,•?•i-?° --? wi ail ill` ? CITY-OWNED PROPERTY { w 23/05 S 4 I:?'I, ! MDR ZONING DESIGNATION » r •• •'.. 'f ti ?il!i tr `I a' Ln:,k E ly Clews. , -i rpoT ?• t . I L '1i';• ; ZONE LINE ae78 ????• IIiJ =iii?,;lll ;ease „ v ' •? l Q PEZOwNa ona .. 24/06 24/04 ID a upaN, 4/11 end. to 100' % I I III i1i sass-nu 23/06 :4ap d 23/11 N '0866 al Ifs mass g Clad. to 100, I lts a „o 5 3/06 eiode=ilea of _ ? ?' ,_____S_-^'__ --- 23/07 23/08 23/09 91-¢0 r ' PARM'B' PARCEL "C" PARCEL "D' PARCEL ••E" I 1 IPA ACEL I ' TQ p UgpARCE 24/02 I 13/07 u PLACE ? 1 1 3 B U za/m ? m I P ! I ' ao REVISED: - - ea3-n8 ,40r-.w, $ 4ULF $ TO BAY BLVD $ S. R. 60 $ R $ - - $ 2?2?01 .? -- -- -- -- - $ R -- -- R ZONING ATLAS y x 2998 - 7HF ' NW 1/4 OF SECTION 91,A ? 300A 300B 17 - 29 S - 16 E 11.40 am Case Number: FLD2006-05[19 -- 100 PARK PLACE BLVD S . Owner(s): Park Isle Condo Development Ll `• ?j?? O` 100 Atlanta Technology Ctr Ste Atlanta, Ga 30318 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email mew Representative: Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire ?? P O Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-462-0365, E-MAIL: timj@jpfirm.com Location: 26.99 acres located on both sides of Park Place Boulevard (100 and 101 South Park Place Boulevard), south of Drew Street and north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Atlas Page: 291 A Zoning District: O, Office Request: Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of a Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces) and (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted) and to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Jim Keller Applicant: Tim Johnson, Jayne Sears The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Environmental: 1 . No Issues Fire: 1 . No issues Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . To accommodate the Engineering Department's request for sidewalks, submit a tree survey (with canopies) and, to insure limited tree impacts, place a note on the plans to place the walks "on grade" under the canopies of the trees. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: I . No issues. Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - project exempt - P&R requirements met prior to 1983 (Ordinances 3128-83 and 3129-83). Stormwater: No Issues Solid Waste: 1 . No issues. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 29, 2006 - Page 28 y 1 , Provide handica•king stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section 100, Index No. 118 &119) http : //www. myclearwater. com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Pro duction/stddet/index. asp 2. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk and to multiple buildings on site compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: 1 . Amend the request to include the Termination to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces). Provide appropriate justification. 2. To retain the signage on the walls on either side of Park Place Boulevard, the Termination request must be amended to include the following: To permit the two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted). Provide appropriate justification. Staff may not support such request, preferring to have the signage brought into compliance with the Code. To retain the signage within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard at Gulf to Bay Boulevard, the Termination request must be amended to include the following: To permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet. Provide appropriate justification. Staff may not support such request, preferring to have the signage brought into compliance with the Code. 4. Site inspection reveals there is additional freestanding signage in the form of two banners each attached to four light poles on both sides of the entrances on both sides of Park Place Blvd. Records do not indicate any permits for these signs. Please remove these signs. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/15/06 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/6/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 29, 2006 - Page 29 11:40 am Case Number: FLD2006-05U19 -- 100 PARK PLACE BLVD S Owner(s): Park Isle Condo Development Ll , is O? 100 Atlanta Technology Ctr Ste Atlanta, 30318 Dim TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757-1368 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-462-0365, E-MAIL: timj@jpfirm.com Location: 26.99 acres located on both sides of Park Place Boulevard (100 and 101 South Park Place Boulevard), south of Drew Street and north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard. Atlas Page: 291 A Zoning District: O, Office Request: Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of a Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces) and (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted) and to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Jim Keller Applicant: Tim Johnson, Jayne Sears The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . No Issues. Environmental: 1 , No Issues Fire: 1 . No issues Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 _ No issues. Land Resources: 1 . To accommodate the Engineering Department's request for sidewalks, submit a tree survey (with canopies) and, to insure limited tree impacts, place a note on the plans to place the walks "on grade" under the canopies of the trees. Provide prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . No issues. Parks and Recreation: 1 , No issues - project exempt - P&R requirements met prior to 1983 (Ordinances 3128-83 and 3129-83). Stormwater: 1 _ No Issues Solid Waste: 1 . No issues. Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 29, 2006 - Page 30 1 . Provide handica arking stall and sign details compliant with City standards. (Part C Section pP 100, Index No. 118 &119) http://www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/pwa/engin/Production/stddet/index. asp 2. Provide an accessible path from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk and to multiple buildings on site compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11, Section 11-4.3.2. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: 1 . Amend the request to include the Termination to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces). Provide appropriate justification. 2. To retain the signage on the walls on either side of Park Place Boulevard, the Termination request must be amended to include the following: To permit the two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted). Provide appropriate justification. Staff may not support such request, preferring to have the signage brought into compliance with the Code. To retain the signage within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard at Gulf to Bay Boulevard, the Termination request must be amended to include the following: To permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet. Provide appropriate justification. Staff may not support such request, preferring to have the signage brought into compliance with the Code. 4. Site inspection reveals there is additional freestanding signage in the form of two banners each attached to four light poles on both sides of the entrances on both sides of Park Place Blvd. Records do not indicate any permits for these signs. Please remove these signs. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 8/15/06 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 7/6/06. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, June 29, 2006 - Page 31 SV#97-10 CITY OF CLEARWATER SIGN VARIANCE TRANSMITTAL TRANSMIT TO: Cynthia Goudeau, City Clerk Earl Dussault, Stephen Sarnoff, Don Melone; Zoning Review Stephen Doherty, Zoning Section Supervisor Don Bohr, Michael Furlong, Community Response Team Case Assignee MEETING DATE CASE #: `August 21, 1997 SV# 97-10 LEGAL/ADDRESS/LOCATION/SIZE: South end of Park Place Blvd. Right-of-Way / Median of Park Place Blvd. at intersection of Gulf to Bay Blvd. OWNER/APPLICANT (BUSINESS)/REPRESENTATIVE: The Grand Reserve at Park Place Ltd. / Johnson VARIANCE(S) REQUESTED: A variance to allow a second freestanding sign of 19.5 square feet in area and 6 feet in height to be located in the median of Park Place Blvd. CODE CITATION (Chapter, Section, Paragraph): 44.57(12) DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIREMENT(S): Signs in public right-of-way prohibited unless approved by City Commission. ZONING/LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: CG (General Commercial) / CG SURROUNDING LAND USES: (Please refer to attached map for zoning/LUP designation of surrounding properties) NORTH: Offices SOUTH: Clearwater Mall EAST: Restaurant WEST: Restaurant CITY OFFICIALS WISHING TO COMMENT MAY DO SO IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW (COMMENTS SHOULD BE RETURNED TO THE CITY CLERK AT LEAST FOURTEEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING). TRANSMITTED BY: Stephen Sarnoff DATE: July 7, 1997 FOR PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COMMISSION /SVT9710.SCS • CENTRAL PERIVEMMGir DEPARTMENT SO. MYRTLE AVE., 2NDFLOQ0 CLEARWATER, FL 34611 PHONE: 662-4667; FAM 562-4576 INSPECTION LINE: 562-4480 r,..,.m. QTr_u VAATAMM? APPI.i[`sATION SV#97-1D ArrJ,LW-U`IL. .rF.q.. .??.- PROPERTY OWNER(S) NAME & ADDRESS: * THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE LIMITED -------- - ------- - - REPRESENTATIVES(S) Cif any) NAME & ADDRESS: TIMOJUX A- JOHNSON E PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership jeRN ONE &KELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & North Lake Destiny Drive, Suite 400 -1161 911 Chestnut Street, P. 0. Box 1368 Maitland, FL 32751 Clearwater, FL 34617-1368 *PROPERTY OWNER IS CITY OF CLEARWATER TELEPHONE: (407 ) 660-8666 TELEPHONE: (813 ) 461-1818 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: South end of Park Place Blvd. R-O-W NAME OF BUSINESS (IF APPLICABLE): The Grand Reserve at Park Place ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: LAND AREA CG (General Commercial) CG TEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SURMCT PROPnT'Y: outh end of Park Place Blvd. R-O-W Median of Park Place Blvd. at intersection of Attaohed Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. "PARCEL NUMBER / I I I ! *Tbis information is available from your tax receipt or contact Pinellas Co. Property ApprRb&s Office at 4643207. If more than one arcel number,. attach 8 % x 1.1 inch sheet. DESCRIBE SURROUNDING USES OF PROPERW East: North. Offices Restaurant South' . Clearwater Mall West: Restaurant VARMNCE(S) REQUEST: A variance to allow a second freestanding sign of 19.5 square feet in area and 6 feet in height to be located in the median of Park Place Blvd. S'Y'ANI,aAIiD FOR AIsPRO'VAL: A variance shall not be granted by the City Commission unless-the application and evidence presented clearly ?ort the following conditions: • 1) There are special circumstances related to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions applicable to the land or buildings, and such circumstances are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to the land or buildings in the applicable zoning district because: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein 2) The strict application of the provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or buildings becalu m: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. 3) The variance is not based exclusively upon a desire for economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner because; See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein 4) The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan and will not be materially injurious to surrounding properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare because: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. THIS SUBMISSION. GIVES AN APPLICANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST THE VARIANCE AND APPEAR B FORE THE DEVELOPMENT CODE ADJUSTMENT BOARD. FFM PAID ARE NON= I RFUNDABLE REGARDLESS OF BOARD ACTION. BY SIGNING THIS DOCUMENT I AM ACKNOWLEDGING THAT ALL FERS PAW DO NOT GUARANTEE APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER OR RESPRESENTA ?G (Include position and name of co any if applicable) TIMOTHY A- JOHNSON, JR. Sworn to and subserled before me this___ 14th ?y of July , A.D., 19 97 E. E . D. ARMSTRONG III who is personally know to m@ has produced as identification. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUN'T'Y OF PINELLAS ?• Commission: WW)Oublic JAYNE E. SEARS MY COMMISSION 1 CC307811 EXPIRES Jayne E. Sears &-OWmber2, 1997 Name of Notary typed, printed or stamped BONDED THPAJ TROY FAIN INSUPA NCE' INC NOTUS: • PROPERTY OWNER OR REPMENTATIVE MUSS ATTEND HEARING. APPLICATION SHALL INCLUDE A CURRENT AND ACCLInRA'Y`E SY't'E Platy. FORM . SIGNS VARIANCE ( November 8.19M14104)003 EXHIBIT "A" TO SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION SV#9T-11 1) There are special circumstances related to the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions applicable to the land or buildings, and such circumstances are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to the land or buildings in the applicable zoning district because: The Grand Reserve at Park Place is located on Park Place Boulevard within the Park Place DRI. Although Park Place Blvd. is a public right-of-way, it is generally traveled only by those visiting developments within the Park Place DRI. It is important to have property identification on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. 2) The strict application of the provisions of the code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or buildings because: Without the granting of this variance, the applicant's property will not have a property identification sign on Gulf-to-Bay Blvd. Such identification is necessary, not only for advertising purposes but for the guests and invitees of the residents of The Grand Reserve at Park Place. . 3) The variance is not based exclusively upon a desire for economic or other material gain by the applicant or owner because: The applicant is developing Lots 2 and 3, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc. Park Place with a total of 390 upscale apartment units at a substantial financial investment to the applicant. The applicant has exhausted all efforts and has been unable to come to an agreement with the party controlling the existing property identification sign in the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way. 4) The granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan and will not be materially injurious to surrounding properties or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare because: The proposed sign has been designed to be unobtrusive, aesthetically in keeping with the area and of the minimal size needed to appropriately designate the entrance of a development of this size. ..- I.. vI m a ss? tg H (A I r e M N • cn ~ n r w per lplacs n m uo ao r. ? w r m' a n ? SIGN AREA - 19.5 SORT. f 4%b r d,1 400 ', .. ,, i f 6e i eoo M. • s- f '?,n ce ??o r'? ?1 ? 23/01 • V c? ^ ?; dos %IWO 1100 24,06 i 23/11 ft 44w „-?:? '---- J.J. GGS 9 "4O ' PARCEL 'B' PARCEL "C" PARCEL V PAR L -E- P?aca CE i) p pLACE U''? 1 3 6 « « a $? N6,3 - 175 591 -IJ17 GULF TO BAY BLVD S S R 4 A S 31/01 A STATION (5) p ?. P/sp Pin sdung oww ±`7 it ac -rs ?rr?? A M Odom K7rnas? J - I of wrratel w b? I ,, i Nn.oro? as -w novr a. - rxova rr /?'? a r7wUO 'Or *win ` •Nv tJvq+rs? 000000 ? ro m ? o yo srvi >i 3+r YMAIrl SAY dK1pM ?r -t ONYMM 1~ M ?f yr ?r XWA •Y4 Ar1MON MOO ++,, 3 •sv rAMnrnw iM AAAJ? ,,,,, Al,Llr u s•n lH y,r rrn,g0 31r rrnssw Q >i •aw ?ooo¦waD -yw Tur+e r Q ' n ???' 'xv nos -u e o c ? ? 6 Zq viii 0 '3W AYWVM a+in,,c+r i a 0 • • Sarnoff, Stephen From: Richter, John Sent: Monday, July 28, 1997 10:22 AM To: Shuford, Scott Cc: Sarnoff, Stephen Subject: FW: SV 97-10 Park Place R-O-W Sign If Rich does not support placement of a sign within a public R/W, we probably shouldn't be processing this variance. Would you agree that we should bring this variance application to a stop now before it gets to the CC? From: Sarnoff, Stephen Sent: Monday, July 28, 1997 9:38 AM To: Richter, John Subject: SV 97-10 Park Place R-O-W Sign As of Friday afternoon Engineering staff at the direction of Rich Baird, as per City Commission policy LD-3 will not support a new median sign in the public right-of-way of Park Place Blvd. Jayne Sears had informed me that they had Richs' support, that is why I even accepted the application for city r-o-w. Stephen Page 1 07/28/97 16:47 0813 441 8617 JOHNSON BLAKELY 0 0 JOHNSON, BLAKELY, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, P..4_ 911 Chestnut Street. P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater FL 34617-1368 Telephone: (813) 461-1818 Fax: (813) 441-8617 Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Stephen C. Sarnoff Company: Clearwater Central Permitting Phone: 562-4567 Fax: 562-4576 From: Jayne Sears, Legal Asst. Client Name: LeCesse Client/Matter Number: 37262.94979 Date: July 28, 1997 Pages including this Comments: cover page: 2 Re: Grand Reserve Hi Steve. Attached is Scott Shuford's letter indicating that the staff will support a second freestanding sign at the Park Place Boulevard entrance. Scott mentions that the preference would be an addition to the existing sign; however our client has exhausted all efforts and is unable to use the existing sign. As you can see, we contacted Scott and obtained this letter well in advance of submitting any applications. Accordingly, please present the letter to Rich Baler and/or Scott Shuford so that our application may be processed. Tim Johnson has also offered to meet with Rich Baler if you feel that would be helpful. Thanks very much for all of your efforts. The informaton contained in this tranamisslon n-my be attorney/client privileged and therefore confidential. This information Is intended only for the use of dhe individual ar entity named above. if the reader of this message is not the intended recipient. YOU are hereby MMOd that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error or If you are not the Individual or entity named above, the receipt of this transmission is not Intended to and does riot waive any privilege. attomey1client or otherwise. If you have moelved this communication in error, please notify us by telephone, collect and return the original message to us at the above address vie U.S. Postal Service. You will be reimbursed for any poabage or any outer expense associated with the return of this document Thank you- to 001 AMOUNT: $ 37262.94979 07/28/97 07/28/97 r 16:47 0813 441 8617 i. JOHNSON BLAKELY 0 002 CITY OF CLEARWATER Posr Orrlc.E Box 4748, CLEA vmu, FLoRtDA 34&184748 MUmam Sl tiVias BUimjm. 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEMEWATM4 FLORIDA 34616 MEPNONE (813) 5624567 CENTRAL PER mrrnNG DEPARTMENT February 20, 1997 Mr. Tim Johnson 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 34616 Dear Tim: This is in response to your request for information regarding a potential second freestanding sign at the Park Place Boulevard entrance to identify the Grand Reserve apartment complex. The staff would clearly prefer that the Grand Reserve be identified either on or through an addition to the existing freestanding sign in this location. However, we would support a second freestanding sign if arrangements cannot be made to accommodate the Grand Reserve at or on the existing sign. The Grand Reserve represents a major investment in our community. An apartment complex was certainly not contemplated at the time the Park Place Development was conceived and signage for it designed and approved. Consequently we feel we can support additional signage at this location to identify the apartment complex. I apologize for the delay in getting this response to you_ Please advise if you have any questions for comments. Sincerely yours, Scott Shuford Director SS/dsr SS Letter - Tim Johnson 0 "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFPQRMATtvE Ar.MON EMPLMTR° AU3-28-1995 16:44 CLEARWATER CITY COMMISSION 813 462 6488 P.001i001 rti/t =w To Phone * Phoh Y F•x ? ! J ? Policy Statement 7 General Topic Subject: Date Adopted: 1/16/90 Land Development Subdivision Monuments Amended: 3/4/93 Amends: Rescinds: Reference: 2/19/81 Agenda Item #13 4/14/87 Policy Book Work Session 3/4/93 Agenda Item #34 Statement: New entranceway landscaping, monuments. signage. and walls shall not be allowed within the public rights-of-way of the City of Clearwater. Such special treatments are to be upon private property and in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations. The owners of all existing entranceway features occupying public property are to execute an agreement with the City of Clearwater wherein owners agree to keep all features in good repair, hold the City harmless for any liability arising from the use of the public right- of-way, and provide a $500.000 liability insurance policy. Upon failure of the owners to execute such agreement and provide the required insurance policy after forty-five days from written notice, or by tagging the structure when owners cannot be determined. or upon failure of the owners to repair or maintain any feature of the site which has fallen in disrepair after similar notice. the Public Works Department is to remove all such materials occupying the public right-of-way. A wooden sign with breakaway features approved by the City Engineer may be allowed within the public right-of-way when associated with the Parks and Recreation "Adopt a Park" program. and is to be limited to a size necessary to name the sponsoring agency in 3-inch letters. Such sign to be a maximum height of 18-inches. 64 CLEARWATER CITY CLERK Post-Ir PaX NOW Ad1hL TOT A- P.0.2) 1 0 0 ! mow. ? ?Jya*. 0 0 n .- r s PAR 13 ti ?:r» 0 0 R? - i ILK v a' ? v y, 0 0 .wr.ss"wl"??Y'i .1}•'?i??'?1i`t?'? ?? - I.? c..•J:?A?,a • Y ' 't 1 ? g ? 4 :safes " • ? 1 11 4 1 i !J 'i9 n. M 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Fox, MaryJo Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 8:11 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: BIZ2006-00535, 100 Park Place Blvd. They had tons of portable signs placed all over the city advertising their condo sales. After sending notices, sign counseling via phone calls, they still did not comply. I ended up sending them several citations. I believe the signs on publicly owned land were removed after being issued the citations. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 9:58 AM To: Fox, MaryJo Subject: BIZ2006-00535, 100 Park Place Blvd. Mary Jo - I have an FLD case for this property (and 101 Park Place Blvd.) that I am working on, which includes signage. What is the status of this case? What kind of portable signs were these? Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 1:03 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: 100 & 101 Park place FYI -----Original Message----- From: Thompson, Neil Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 12:19 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: 100 & 101 Park place Gina, as requested, please find the attached memo regarding landscape of the above site. Neil Park Place memo May 25.doc t May 25, 2006 Gina Re: 100 & 101 S. Park Place Blvd. (aka 20 S. Park Place Blvd) Scott Kurleman, Scott Sullivan and I reviewed the above referenced site for conformance with current code landscape requirements as you requested. We reviewed the landscape file (20 S. Park Place Blvd) copy of approved, as built and re-inspection records as well as made an onsite inspection. We concur that the site meets or exceeds the current code landscape requirements. Of particular but not exclusive note: • The site has the requisite 15' continuously maintained perimeter buffer • Street trees of Florida grade #1 are provided exceeding the 35' minimum spacing requirement • Specimen Palms including Royal and Reclinata are utilized at key entrances • Seasonal color accent plantings are included, exceeding code • Interior landscaping exceeds standard and is protected by curbs and wheel stops • The site was subject of at least two re-inspections since the initial installation and replanting occurred as required 0 The general appearance of the site is one of well and continuous maintenance Diaision of Corporations • Page 1 of 2 nrf,?f' I) 711 j-ht*t'?Tf 1 r ? t}pFY'- rts'T n ? (?YY'!?j 1t?1"t;? Public 1xiquiry Florida Limited Liability PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 100 ATLANTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER, SUITE 200 1575 NORTHSIDE DRIVE NW ATLANTA GA 30318 MAILING ADDRESS 100 ATLANTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER, SUITE 200 1575 NORTHSIDE DRIVE NW ATLANTA GA 30318 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed L05000094607 203868103 09/26/2005 State FL Last Event NAME CHANGE AMENDMENT Total Contribution 0.00 Status ACTIVE Event Date Filed 11/21/2005 Effective Date NONE Event Effective Date NONE ReLyistered A Name & Address WALTERS, MICHAEL A 50 NORTH LAURA ST. SUITE 2600 JACKSONVILLE FL 32202 11 Manaizer/Member Detail Titl d e ress Name & Ad JLC SUNCOAST REALTY 11, LLC 1575 NORTHSIDE DRIVE NW 100 ATC, SUITE 200 MGR ATLANTA GA 30318 http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a 1=DETFIL&n 1=LO5000094607&n2=NAMFW... 5/30/2006 Division of Corporations 0 • Page 2 of 2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2006 05/04/2006 Previous Filing eturn. View Events View Name History Next Filing Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 05/04/2006 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP 11/21/2005 -- Name Change 09/26/2005 -- Florida Limited Liabilites THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help http: //www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a 1=DETFIL&n 1=LO5 000094607&n2=NAMFW... 5/30/2006 er Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 0 Page 2 of 5 Pirellas County Property App 6 14 17 / 29 / 10 / 05540 / 000 / 0020 30-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:38:26 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales PARK ISLE CONDO DEVELOPMENT LLC OBK: 14830 OPG: 1120 C/O LE CRAW, JULIAN & CO 100 ATLANTA TECHNOLOGY CTR STE 200 1575 NORTHSIDE OR HW ATLANTA GA 30318 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 101 S P ARK PLACE BLVD of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 268.08 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/2,005 14,830/1,120 70,500,000 (M) I 1992: Book 109 Pgs 010-011 10/2,000 11,07611,642 37,853,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 1 /1,997 915911 25 3,500,000 (M) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 12,850,000 Homestead: NO, Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 12,850,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 12,850,000 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 298,598.02 1) 569 x 753 12, 000.00 156.00 T Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 11000.00 2.30 A 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 298, 598.02 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 298, 598.02 Short Legal STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLAC E Description LOT 2 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?plus=l &r=0.32&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=4&t3... 5/30/2006 Pinellas County Property Appier Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 04 Page 3 of 5 17 / 29 / 10 / 85540 / 000 / 0020 :01 30-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:38:26 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Mult Res Apt C4 St Property Address: 101 S PARK PLACE BLVD Prop Use: 310 Land Use: 03 Structural E1?emcnts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Frame Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Wood Beam & Column Roof Frame Wood Frame/Truss Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 818 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Square Quality Above Average Year Built 11998 Effective Age 8 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 181,152 7) .00 0 2) Screen Porch .40 5,118 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 23,130 9) .00 0 4) Garage .55 14,544 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C ommE:r c 1 a1 Extra F c at ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 56500SF 1.75 56,500 98,880 98,880 11998 2) POOL i060SF 75,000.00 1 75,000 60,000 1,998 3) FIRESPRINK 181152 1.75 181,152 317,020 285,320 1,998 4) FENCE 2500LF 11.00 2,500 27,500 22,000 1,998 5) FIREPLACE 61 2,500.00 61 152,500 137,250 1.998 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 603,450 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) FA I F*- I v R T T F Q I N j http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?plus=l &r=0.32&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=4&t3... 5/30/2006 i Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 06 Page 4 of 5 w z w a z 0 r ? ? ?? .iit•iN a krjjID 0 0 I 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &r=0.32&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=4&t3... 5/30/2006 Pinellas County Property Ap1wr Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 00 0 Page 5 of 5 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &r=0.32&o=1 &a=l &b=1 &c=1 &s=4&t3... 5/30/2006 er Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 00 Page 2 of 7 Pinellas County Property App i 1 17 / 29 ! 16 I 85546 I 000 1 0030 30-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:37:35 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales PARK ISLE CONDO DEVELOPMENT LLC OBK: 14830 OPG: 1120 C/0 LE CRAW, JULIAN & CO 100 ATLANTA TECHNOLOGY CTR STE 200 1575 NORTHSIDE DR NW ATLANTA GA 30318 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 100 S PARK PLACE BLUO of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 268.08 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 1212,005 14,83011,120 70,500,000 (M) I 1992: Book 109 Pgs 010-011 1012,000 11,076/1,642 37,853,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 1 11,997 91591/ 25 3,500,000 (M) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 { } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 19,300,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exam: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 19,300,000 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exam: 0 Taxable: 19,300,000 Agricultural: 0 2005 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 05 Taxes: 448,477.96 1) 0 x 0 12,000. 00 234. 00 T Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 448,477.96 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 448, 477.96 Short Legal STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE Description LOT 3 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?plus=l &r=0%2E32&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=4... 5/30/2006 t Pinellas County Property Appier Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 06 Prol erty and Land Use Code descriptions . Building 1 . Building 2 . Building 3 Building #1 Page 3 of 7 17 / 29 / 10 / 85540 / 000 / 0030 :01 30-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:37:36 Commercial Card 01 of 3 Improvement Type: Mult Res Apt C4 St Property Address: 100 S PARK PLACE BLVD Prop Use: 310 Land Use: 03 Structural E1BmE3 nts Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Frame Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Wood Beam & Column Roof Frame Wood Frame/Truss Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 1,22 Bath Tile Floor Only Electric Average Shape Factor Square Quality Above Average Year Built 1,998 Effective Age 8 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Arras Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 278,476 7) .00 0 2) Screen Porch .40 8,512 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 35,350 9) .00 0 4) Garage .55 21,816 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C Omm Br c 1 a1 Extra F at ur s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 85000SF 1.75 85,000 148,750 148,750 1,998 2) POOL 2489SF 75,000.00 1 75,000 60,000 1,998 3) FIRESPRIHK 278476 1.75 278,476 487,330 409,360 1,995 4) TEHHISCT 25, 000.00 1 25,000 20,000 1,998 5) BBCOURT 6,000.00 1 61000 4,800 1,998 6) FENCE 2900LF 11.00 2,900 31,900 25,520 11998 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 668,430 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?plus=l &r=0%2E32&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=4... 5/30/2006 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 04 Page 4 of 7 17 / 29 / 10 / 85540 / 000 / 0030 :02 30-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:37:38 Commercial Card 02 of 3 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 2600 W ORAHO RESERVE CIR Prop Use: 310 Land Use: 03 Structural E14emo--nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Frame Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover ctl/gd mtl Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 6 Bath Tile Floor Only Electric Average Shape Factor Square Quality Above Average Year Built 11998 Effective Age 8 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i. 00 5,849 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 1,644 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C ommEr (----L a1 E xt r a F eat ur c-- !=- Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Building #3 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?plus=l &r=0%2E32&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=4... 5/30/2006 Page 5 of 7 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 0 4 17 / 29 / 16 / 85546 / 000 / 4030 :03 30-May-2006 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:37:38 Commercial Card 03 of 3 Improvement Type: Warehouse Property Address: 2600 W GRAND RESERVE CIR Prop Use: 310 Land Use: 03 Structural E1?men.ts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Frame Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Concrete Finish Interior Finish None Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 2 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Square Quality Above Average Year Built 11998 Effective Age 8 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar ? as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 1,000 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C ommE3 r c 1 a1 Extra F 6 at ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*_1 F;11, Ft-1 RE] Pq Fq http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?plus=l &r=0%2E32&o=1 &a=1 &b=l &c=l &s=4... 5/30/2006 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 04 Page 6 of 7 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-ser3?plus=l &r=0%2E32&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=4... 5/30/2006 DREW Pinellas County Property App ser Information: 17 29 16 85546 000 0010 Page 7 of 7 0 7 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An exRlanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?plus=l &r=0%2E32&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=4... 5/30/2006 CITY COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF CLEARWATER August 21, 1997 Present: Rita Garvey J. B. Johnson Robert Clark Ed Hooper Karen Seel Michael J. Roberto Kathy S. Rice Bob Keller Richard L. Hedrick Pamela K. Akin Scott Shuford Rich Baier Cynthia E. Goudeau Patricia O. Sullivan Mayor/Commissioner Vice-Mayor/Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner City Manager Deputy City Manager Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager City Attorney Central Permitting Director Engineering Director City Clerk Board Reporter The Mayor called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. The invocation was offered by Reverend Donald "Skip" Dvornik of Calvary Baptist Church. The Mayor led the Pledge of Allegiance. To provide continuity for research, items are in agenda order although not necessarily discussed in that order. ITEM #3 - Service Awards Two service awards were presented to City employees. ITEM #4 - Introductions and Awards Proclamation - Firefighter Appreciation Week - August 25 - September 1, 1997 ITEM #5 - Presentations - None. ITEM #6 - Approval of Minutes Commissioner Seel moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of August 7, 1997, and the special meeting of April 26, 1997, as recorded and submitted in written summation by the City Clerk to each Commissioner. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #7 - Citizens to be heard re items not on the Agenda Jay Keyes, of the Clearwater Beach Association, recommended the former water tower site remain green and open. mcc08b97 1 08/21/97 PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM #8 - (Cont'd from 07/17/97) Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property located at 26417 US 19N, Sec. 30-28-16, M&B 43.12 (Olde Property Corp., SV97-07) On July 17, 1997, this variance was continued. The applicant, Countryside Village Square shopping center, had requested a second, 452.5-square foot freestanding sign that is 32.5-feet high and set back 5-feet. This modified request is for a second freestanding sign that is 29 feet tall, 304 square-feet large, and set back 5-feet. This property, on the East side of US 19N, South of Countryside Boulevard, is zoned Commercial Center. Olde Discount Stockbrokers owns this property and has provided Countryside Village Square an easement on which to place the sign. Two signs currently are adjacent to the driveway: 1) Olde sign on North.side and 2) Countryside Village Square sign on South side. The shopping center wishes to replace its existing sign. The current sign is too tall and large to comply with current sign regulations and should have been brought into compliance by October 1992. Todd Pressman, representing the applicant, verified photographs of the property presented him by Central Permitting Director Scott Shuford. Mr. Pressman said this is the large development's sole sign on US 19N. He said the message portion of the sign is 304-square feet. He noted US 19N traffic orientation has changed significantly. The shopping center was constructed with direct ingress/egress to the highway. Northbound customers must exit onto the access road before reaching the property. Mr. Pressman said the center's circuitous design and the nearby elevation of US 19N impact the visibility of tenants' wall signs by passing motorists. He indicated the site has less signage than allowed on Countryside Boulevard and Village Drive. The subject driveway serves as a major entrance to the shopping center. He said the request is not excessive and meets the criteria for a variance. It was suggested motorists would be unable to read all of the proposed signage. Mr. Pressman said the larger signs will serve the center's larger tenants. Mr. Shuford suggested a condition could limit signage on the remainder of the property. In response to a question, Mr. Pressman said the site has a freestanding sign at the signal light on Countryside Boulevard. In response to a question, Mr. Shuford indicated staff would have cited that sign if it does not comply with code. It was noted the proposed 304-square foot sign is 29 feet high, 9 feet higher than allowed by code. Mr. Shuford recommended a freestanding sign be approved for this location as the entrance needs visibility. It was recommended the sign list the center's address. Commissioner Johnson moved to deny a variance of 1 freestanding sign to allow a second freestanding sign with an area of 304-square feet, a height of 29-feet, and a 5 foot setback from all property lines, where a maximum of 1 freestanding sign is permitted and moved to approve a variance of 1 freestanding sign to allow a second freestanding sign with an area of 150-square feet, a height of 20-feet, and a 5-foot setback from all property lines, where a maximum of 1 freestanding sign is permitted, on property identified as Sec. 30-28-16, M&B mcc08b97 2 08/21/97 43.12, for meeting Sec. 45.24, Standards for Approval, items (1)-(4), and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded. In response to a question, Mr. Shuford indicated this approval will replace the current 452.5-square foot sign. It was recommended that freestanding signs for the center on Village Drive be required to remain the same size. Mr. Pressman indicated the City staff have reported all violations on the property. Upon the vote being taken, Commissioners Johnson, Clark, Seel, and Mayor Garvey voted "Aye"; Commissioner Hooper voted "Nay." Motion carried. ITEM #9 - (Cont'd from 07/17/97) Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property (Countryside Square Shopping Center) located at 2555 Countryside Blvd., Countryside Village Square, Lots 5, 7 & 8 (HRE Properties, SV97-08) Upon request of the applicant, Countryside Village Square Shopping Center, this variance request was continued from July 17, 1997. This property, bounded by US 19N, Countryside Boulevard, and Village Drive, is zoned Commercial Center. The applicant requests a variance of 1 freestanding sign to allow a second freestanding sign with an area of 18.8- square feet, a height of 17-feet, and a minimum setback of 65 feet from the Village Drive right- of-way, where a maximum of 1 freestanding sign is permitted. The variance is requested for Tuesday Morning which has 2 freestanding signs: 1) one on the business' East side and 2) one on the business' West side. The variance is requested to allow existing signs to remain. Mr. Shuford said staff had contacted Richard Kane regarding his letter of objection to this request. Mr. Kane was advised the variance will not change current signage. He indicated continued opposition. Todd Pressman, representative for the applicant, verified photographs of the property presented him by Mr. Shuford. It was noted the signs are classified, freestanding, although they resemble wall signs. The signs are smaller than permitted for wall signage. The store, Tuesday Morning, does not abut the parking lot or street but is reached via two passageways. Commissioner Seel moved to approve a variance of 1 freestanding sign to allow a 2nd freestanding sign with an area of 18.8-square feet, a height of 17-feet, and minimum setback of 65-feet from the Village Drive right-of-way, where a maximum of 1 freestanding sign is permitted, on property identified as Countryside Village Square, Lots 5, 7, and 8, for meeting Sec. 45.24, Standards for Approval, items (1)-(4), and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #10 - Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property located at 101 S. Park Place Blvd., Storz Ophthalmics, Inc., Park Place, Lots 2 & 3 (The Grand Reserve at Park Place Limited Partnership, SV97-09) The Grand Reserve apartments will be constructed on Lots 2 and 3 of Park Place. Both lots are zoned Residential Planned Development 16. Park Place Boulevard divides the development. A gated entrance, with signs, will be constructed on each side of Park Place mcc08b97 3 08/21/97 Boulevard. The following variances were requested for each entrance: 1) a variance of 5 signs to allow 7 signs and 2) a variance of 111.1-square feet to allow an aggregate sign area of 159.1-square feet. Staff recommends denial as these variances represent substantial deviations from the sign code. Mr. Shuford stated the applicant had submitted an amended request. As the Commission had not received this information prior to the meeting, he recommended continuing the Item. Ed Armstrong, representative for the applicant, said the 18-acre development will feature high-end apartments. He said the proposal includes a 3.3 square-foot "GR" on each wrought iron gate at the 2 entrances. The decorative emblems, classified as signs, will not be visible from adjacent property. In response to a question, he said the gates will be setback onto the subject property. He reported black granite slab signs, recessed close to the gates, are proposed for both entrance medians. He said the requested message area is within 5% of sign code requirements. Mr. Armstrong said extensive landscaping is planned. In response to a question, Mr. Shuford said the development will not connect with Hampton Road. The "Welcome Home" sign was eliminated from the amended request. Commissioner Seel moved to approve`the applicant's amended request. The motion was duly seconded. Concern was expressed the Commission had not received details of this amended request and needed more information before reaching a decision. Commissioner Seel withdrew her motion. The seconder agreed. Commissioner Clark moved to continue Item #10. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #11 - Variance(s) to Sign Regulations for property located in the median of Park Place Blvd., at intersection of Gulf to Bay Blvd., South end of Park Place Blvd. r-o-w (The Grand Reserve at Park Place Limited Partnership, SV97-10) This property, on the North side of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard and East of US 19N, is zoned General Commercial. The applicant requests a variance to allow a 2nd freestanding sign in Park Place Boulevard's median. The Park Place development agreement contemplated the placement of signs within the street right-of-way. The proposed sign, 6-feet high with 19.5 - square feet, will be placed North of the existing sign to identify the Grand Reserve apartments, approximately 1/5 mile North on Park Place Boulevard. Ed Armstrong, representative for the applicant said the additional sign will identify the Grand Reserve apartment development. Commissioner Seel moved to approve a variance to allow a 2nd freestanding sign 19.5- square feet in area and 6-feet high in the median at the South end of Park Place Boulevard, at the intersection of Gulf-to-Bay Boulevard, for meeting Sec. 45.24, Standards for Approval, mcc08b97 4 08/21/97 items (1)-(4), subject to the following condition: 1) applicant shall execute a revocable maintenance agreement with the City that will require the applicant to maintain the sign in good repair and 2) applicant shall provide liability protection to the City and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Public Hearing - Second Reading Ordinances ITEM #12 - Ord. #6149-97 - Creating new section 21.17 relating to begging by intimidation; providing definitions; prohibiting begging with intent to intimidate The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6149-97 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Hooper moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6149-97 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Seel and Garvey. "Nays": None. ITEM #13 - Ord. #6166-97 - relating to occupational license fees; amending Appendix A, Schedule of Fees, Rates and Charges by 5% increase in fees and amending administrative fees charges The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6166-97 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6166-97 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Seel and Garvey. "Nays": None. ITEM #14 - Ord. #6180-97 - establishing a money purchase pension defined contribution plan for certain employees who are employed by the City on or after 06/23/97 The City Attorney presented Ordinance #6180-97 for second reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass and adopt Ordinance #6180-97 on second and final reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Seel and Garvey. "Nays": None. CITY MANAGER REPORTS CONSENT AGENDA (Items #15-19) - Approved as submitted ITEM #15 - Approval of Purchases per 08/12/97 memorandum: mcc08b97 5 08/21/97 Video Editing Equipment, Steadi Systems of New York, $33,954 (IM) One 1997 Ford F-800 chassis with Altec Model AN-650P Aerial Tower, Altec Industries, Inc., $74,402; funding to be provided under City's Master Lease Purchase Agreement (GS) Double Detector Check Valve Assemblies, U.S. Filter Distribution of Tampa, 08/22/97 - 08/14/98, estimated $61,525 (PS) 5 laser printers & 13 bubblejet printers & software for Parks & Recreation remote sites, BCD Computer Distributors, Inc., $16,683.18 (PR) ITEM #16 - C.O.#1 to 1997 Street Resurfacing Contract with Golden Triangle Asphalt Paving Company, Inc., adjusting completion date to 11/21/97 for total time extension of 114 days (EN) ITEM #17 - Ratify/Confirm C.O.#2 for reconstruction of Highland Avenue, from North of Gulf to Bay Blvd. to North of Sunset Point Rd., Overstreet Paving Company, increasing amount by $399,153.65 for new total of $4,797,788.11, and approve time extension of 161 days (EN) ITEM #18 - Unfair Labor Practice Charge - Terence Kelly and Pinellas County Police Benevolent Association vs. City - authorization for assignment of defense to Thompson, Sizemore & Gonzalez (CA) ITEM #19 - Amendment to City Attorney employment agreement (CA) Commissioner Johnson moved to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. OTHER ITEMS ON CITY MANAGER REPORT ITEM #20 - Clearwater Beach Strategic Development Plan, authorize proceeding with planning process (CP) Creating a development plan for Clearwater beach has been discussed since 1991. Staff feels it is time to move forward. Scheduled capital projects, such as the new Memorial Causeway Bridge, Mandalay Avenue streetscaping, a new civic center, etc., require the preparation of a comprehensive plan. As competitors in the State, country, and world are improving their tourism products, the City needs an achievable plan that is supported by the community. Staff proposes for plan development to occur after public input is received and evaluated and for a consultant/City staff partnership to develop the Strategic Development Plan. Consultant team members are: 1) Ralph Stone, former Planning Director for St. Petersburg - Mr. Stone will serve as Project Manager for the Strategic Development Plan, handling media contract, providing editing services, and directing the coordination with any nearby traffic operations work; 2) Dr. James Moore, USF Professor with significant experience in public meeting facilitation and development issues - Dr. Moore will be responsible for facilitating meetings with the public and coordinating public comments into a design concept for the mcc08b97 6 08/21/97 Strategic Development Plan. He also will examine the general economic feasibility and market liability of specific development strategies; and 3) Jason Westrope, USF Masters Thesis - Clearwater beach - Mr. Westrope will be responsible for creating the draft and final versions of the Strategic Development Plan, including graphics. He also will use his research skills to facilitate the project. Each consultant will have contracts with the City substantially less than the $25,000 maximum the City Manager can execute. Actual contract amounts are being negotiated. The total for all 3 contracts is not expected to exceed $50,000. Funding available in a special Capital Project account will cover the anticipated expenses of this planning process. Due to the nature of this project and anticipated public participation, staff requests the Commission be aware and authorize the program as presented. Work will begin immediately upon Commission authorization. Mr. Shuford reviewed the plan. He indicated this proposal differs from previous studies which focused on specific areas or narrow purposes. He stated the study's proposed time line is fairly short. The consultants will begin meeting with the various groups as soon as possible. He estimated the team will be able to present a plan to the Commission in January 1998. It was suggested the "big picture" be considered, including how each project will affect the overall plan. In response to a question, Mr. Shuford said the study is designed to include input from the entire City. Commissioner Clark moved to authorize proceeding with the Clearwater Beach strategic planning process. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. ITEM #21 - First Reading Ord. #6176-97 - revising Sec. 28.04 and Appendix A, Schedule of Fees, Rates and Charges, XXVIII, Occupational License Fees, to allow the sale of ice cream from trucks on residential streets (CP) Staff received a request to allow the sale of ice cream from trucks on residential streets. Currently, the Code of Ordinances prohibits any sale of merchandise or products on any City street. This proposed use will require a background check, Police Department approval, and a Pinellas County Health Department permit. The request requires changes to two areas of the code: 1) Section 28.04. Trading and selling on streets. (Change language to allow ice cream to be sold from trucks on residential streets.) and 2) Appendix A, Schedule of fees, rates and charges, XXVIII, Occupational License Fees. (Add new "Ice Cream Truck Merchant" category with "Note B," Police Background Check requirement, and "Note D," Pinellas County Health Department Permit requirement.) The City Manager said the proposed ordinance will correct a code section and allow ice cream sales from trucks on residential streets. It was recommended these sales only be permitted on residential streets and not from parking lots or in competition with non-profit organizations such as the Little League, etc. It was recommended the City maintain control over health issues. In response to a question, the City Attorney said background checks are required for ice-cream truck owners but not for their employees. It was felt the background of all ice-cream truck drivers should be checked. The City Attorney said modifying another section of the code could accomplish that requirement. mcc08b97 7 08/21/97 Consensus was for the City Attorney to bring back an ordinance that amends the appropriate code section to require all ice-cream truck drivers to submit to background checks. The City Manager said staff will address concerns that the trucks not remain stationary. The City Attorney reiterated these ice-cream sales will be limited to residential areas. Commissioner Johnson moved to revise Section 28.04 and Appendix A, Schedule of Fees, Rates & Charges, XXVIII, Occupational License Fees, Code of Ordinances. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. The City Attorney presented Ordinance #5803-97 for first reading and read it by title only. Commissioner Clark moved to pass Ordinance #5803-97 on first reading. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Seel and Garvey. "Nays": None. The meeting adjourned from 7:24 to 7:36 p.m. ITEM #22 - Contract to Piper Productions, a Sparks Company to design, fabricate, install & strike the Clearwater / Nagano Hospitality Center, for $395,000 (CM) AND ITEM #23 - Contract to Silver Image Interactive to design & install the technology component of the Clearwater / Nagano Hospitality Center, for $35,000 (CM) In July 1997, the State awarded a $750,000 grant to fund the Clearwater/Nagano Hospitality Center during the 1998 Winter Olympics in Nagano, Japan. Piper Productions, a Sparks Company, has been selected to provide design, fabrication, installation, and strike of the Clearwater/Nagano Hospitality Center on the 5th floor of the Tokyu Department Store in Nagano. Piper Productions, part of one of the top 5 scenic companies in the country, has an office in Tokyo and will be able to decrease delivery times substantially. Silver Image Interactive, Inc. was selected to provide the technology component, interactive kiosks in the Clearwater/Nagano Hospitality Center. The kiosks will provide Center visitors the opportunity to input demographic information and request vacation information. This information will be used to generate reports. Visitors can choose Japanese, French, and English translations. As this project has a short time frame, the City Manager has certified to the purchasing agent an emergency exists regarding the purchase of project commodities and services and indicated competitive bidding would delay the process and be detrimental to City interests. It was determined bidding for these services would be impractical. Information Management Director Jeff Harper said the publicity from this project is worth millions of dollars to the City. Staff selected the large company, Piper Productions, as the most capable. A number of events are planned. Some volunteers from Clearwater will stay with mcc08b97 8 08/21/97 families while in Nagano. Preliminary design work is being done. Some project features will be assembled locally while others will be assembled in Japan. Mr. Harper said visitors to the Center will experience the feel of Florida and be introduced to the State's varied environment. He was confident Piper Productions will complete the project successfully. The City Manager noted the company previously had worked on two Olympics. The conceptual design will be presented to the Commission upon completion. He noted the short time frame requires moving quickly on some issues. The Mayor thanked Mayor Tasuku Tsukada of Nagano for working with the City and Mr. Hiroji Koide of the Friendship Club. She thanked Mr. Nagamitsu Mano, President of the Tokyu Department Store, for providing space for the Hospitality Center. She also thanked the Sister City organization and all volunteers who have worked on this project. In response to a question, Mr. Harper said the sweepstakes are designed to attract people to the pavilion and encourage visitors to provide information at the kiosks. Tourism packages will be given away daily. The City Manager indicated no City dollars are being spent on the packages which Tourism Director Jean Sherry is soliciting from the travel industry. It was suggested the kiosk questionnaires qualify respondents regarding the likelihood they will travel to Clearwater. In response to a question, Mr. Harper said a satellite feed from the Olympics for broadcast on C-View TV is planned. The City Manager indicated the City contributed a total of $25,000 cash to the Clearwater/Nagano Hospitality Center as well as staff time. He will report how much staff time has been dedicated to this project. In response to a question, Mr. Harper said TEM (Total Event Management) is contracted to act as project manager for the Clearwater/Nagano Hospitality Center and will be responsible for day to day operations. Staff is finalizing appropriate contracts. Staff will monitor the expenditure of all grant funds. In response to a question, Mr. Harper said the City will probably use some grant funds to cover travel expenses for a representative from Silver Image Interactive, Inc. to set up the system in Japan. He indicated staff is prepared to maintain the system. The City can repair the system in Nagano. In response to a question, the City Attorney believed the City has no exposure to Wizard Studios. The initial contracts were between Wizard and Clearwater/ Nagano Hospitality Center, Inc., not the City. Wizard Studios claims it is owed $160,000. The City Attorney felt the City owes Wizard Studios nothing. In response to a question, it was stated if these requests are denied the City would have to return the grant money and the City and Nagano Mayor Tasuku Tsukada would lose face. Commissioner Johnson moved to award a Contract to Piper Productions, a Sparks Company, to design, fabricate, install, and strike the Clearwater/Nagano Hospitality Center in an amount not to exceed $395,000 and to award a contract to Silver Image Interactive, Inc. to design and install the technology component (including hardware) of the Clearwater/Nagano Hospitality Center in the amount not to exceed $35,000 and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded. mcc08b97 9 08/21/97 Concern was expressed regarding the Addendum to the Piper Productions contract. The City Attorney indicated the language identifies Piper Productions' surety bond. The City also is insured to cover Clearwater's exposure. She indicated Addendum Item #4 is based on City language. In response to a question, Mr. Harper said Piper Productions' insurance covers the project until the City takes possession of it in Nagano. Concern was expressed that all parts of this project come in under budget. Upon the vote being taken, the motion carried unanimously. ITEM #24 - Other Pending Matters a) Approve 1997 Men's Major Fastpitch National Championship, 8/30 -09/06/97 at Clearwater Bomber Stadium as a special event at which alcoholic beverages can be sold and consumed The Parks & Recreation Department, ASA (Amateur Softball Association), Pinellas Suncoast Metro, and Tampa Bay Smokers will host the 1997 Men's Major Fastpitch National Championships at Clearwater Bomber stadium from August 30 to September 6, 1997. The committee was granted the right to host this tournament after a formal ASA bid procedure. Pinellas Suncoast Metro and the Smokers guaranteed $15,000 cash, plus other tournament costs, and the City agreed to provide Bomber Stadium plus in-kind groundskeeper and facility services. The award includes a condition to request City Commission permission to sell beer at the tournament. Beer sales will provide an opportunity to attract a corporate sponsor for the event and help defray tournament costs, estimated at $37,000. It is proposed to grant the alcoholic beverage license to the Tampa Bay Smokers, a 501c(3) non-profit organization. The Smokers paid their $15,000 bid money to the ASA and hope to recover up to $7,500 after all tournament costs are paid. Smoker and Bomber volunteers and fans will operate the beer concession. Proceeds will go into the tournament fund. Funds not needed for this year's event will rollover to assist future national tournaments. The Special Events Committee recommended approval of this request subject to City Commission approval and satisfaction of all other Code requirements, including a non-alcohol seating area and the applicants paying all additional costs of police and other City Services attributable to the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages. It is anticipated an average 32 people from each of the 22 out-of-state teams will stay in Clearwater, including players, sponsors, managers, and family members. Each team will stay at least 8 nights. The tournament also is expected to attract 300 -400 Fastpitch fans and ASA officials from around the country. The direct economic impact to the Clearwater area is estimated at more than $65,000 It was noted the ordinance requires training for those who dispense alcoholic beverages. The City Manager indicated training will be provided. Deputy City Manager Kathy Rice stated this is an insurance carrier requirement. Staff will make certain this requirement is met. It was recommended staff periodically check on compliance. In response to a question, Parks & Recreation Director Ream Wilson said funds not needed for this event will be returned to the ASA. mcc08b97 10 08/21/97 It was question if this event is sponsored or co-sponsored by the City. Mr. Wilson said the City Commission must approve the dispensing of alcoholic beverages before the City Manager can issue a permit. The City is co-hosting the event although its co-sponsorship is limited to providing the stadium and some in-kind services. In response to a question, Mr. Wilson said the Commission had directed staff to bring back all events not "officially" sponsored or co-sponsored by the City which qualify to sell alcoholic beverage before permission for that type of sales is granted. He will report on whether or not Clearwater will receive a fee for the use of City property for a fireworks presentation, the total cost of in-kind services, and any other applicable fees paid to the City. Mr. Wilson noted the tournament's economic impact on Clearwater will be significant. The tournament is not paying a fee for use of the stadium. In response to a question, Ms. Rice reported the City was asked to waive the fee for a fireworks display. Commissioner Hooper moved to approve the 1997 Men's Major Fastpitch National Championships on August 30, 1997, through September 6, 1997, at Clearwater bomber Stadium as a Special Event at which alcoholic beverages can be sold and that the appropriate officials be authorized to execute same. The motion was duly seconded. Commissioners Clark, Hooper, and Seel and Mayor Garvey voted "Aye"; Commissioner Johnson voted "Nay." Motion carried. Ms. Rice questioned if the City Commission's direction is to continue to bring forward these requests to sell alcoholic beverages at Special Events. The majority agreed this procedure is correct. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS ITEM #25 - Resolutions a) Res. #97-48 - Demolition Lien - 1107 Carlton St., Greenwood Park, Blk C, Lot 14 (Lottie Williams) The City Attorney presented Resolution #97-48 and read it by title only. Commissioner Hooper moved to pass and adopt Resolution #97-48 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded In response to a question, the City Attorney said the next step would be to file a lien. At some point the City will either be paid or will foreclose on the property. If other liens are ahead of the City's, staff will evaluate the City's status and determine the likelihood of success. She reported the City has been fairly successful in collecting on liens. Upon the roll call vote being taken, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Seel and Garvey. "Nays": None. b) Res. #97-50 - Rescinding Res. #97-32 adopted 05/01/97 mcc08b97 11 08/21/97 The City Attorney presented Resolution #97-50 and read it by title only. Commissioner Johnson moved to pass and adopt Resolution #97-50 and authorize the appropriate officials to execute same. The motion was duly seconded and upon roll call, the vote was: "Ayes": Johnson, Clark, Hooper, Seel and Garvey. "Nays": None. ITEM #26 - Other City Attorney Items The City Attorney requested an attorney/client session regarding Anne-Marie Cheroke Lindsey as guardian of Paul W. Gilfoyle versus the City. A tentative session was scheduled for September 15, 1997. ITEM #27. - City Manager Verbal Reports The City Manager scheduled a closed bargaining session following the September 2, 1997, Work Session. Assistant City Manager Bob Keller reported a new record, indicating building permits have exceeded $100-million during the first 9 months of the current fiscal year. He said this progress was influenced by the healthy economy and increased recognition of Clearwater by the region and nation. Staff and the City Commission have played a significant role. He noted few construction permits for hotels and motels were issued this decade. It was stated the new business guide is very impressive. Mr. Keller said the guide was developed as a joint venture with the Greater Clearwater Chamber of Commerce. ITEM #28 - Other Commission Action Commissioner Seel congratulated the safety program which trains City school crossing guards. Commissioner Seel said the Ambassador Program provides a worthwhile opportunity for Commissioners to visit area, publicly traded companies. Commissioner Johnson felt the Commission should not be required to approve each group which proposes to sell alcohol at events co-sponsored by the City. In response to a question, the City Attorney said the City's liability is substantially covered. Commissioner Clark congratulated the Economic Development Team and invited residents to view the related C-View TV program. ITEM #29 - Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:28 p.m. mcc08b97 12 08/21/97 V_/ 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, October 17, 2006, beginning at 1:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Canterbury, LLC. (Roush Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc) are requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to permit ten attached dwellings (townhomes) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 to 140 ft, a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north and south) setback from 10 to five ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 15 to six ft (to dumpster enclosure), as a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sect. 2-4045, and reduction to the side (north & south) landscape buffers from 10 to five ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10 lot subdivision. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 townhomes). at 622 Lembo Circle Lembo Sub Lots 6-7. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner ll. FLD2006-06034 2. Park Isle Condominium Development, LLC (Timothy A. Johnson, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns) are requesting Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces), (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a ht of 11 ft (where a maximum of six ft high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square ft (where a maximum of 24 square ft is permitted) and (4) to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Blvd right- of-way at Gulf to Bay Blvd. with a ht of six ft and an area of 45 square ft, under the provisions of Sec. 6-109.C. Existing Use: 390 attached dwellings at 100 and 101 Park Place Blvd, S, Storz Ophthalmics, Inc, Park Place Lots 2-3. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-05029 3. PBP of Clearwater, Inc (Pilot Construction Technology, Inc.) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a 20,050 sq-ft office building in addition to existing retail sales and services with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 7.29 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 5.53 ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 22.91 ft (to existing building) and from 25 ft to 10.82 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side . (west) setback from 10 ft to 5.33 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6.48 ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to proposed building) and from 10 ft to 7 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 4.77 ft (to existing I • pavement), an increase to building ht from 25 ft to 50 ft (to roof deck) and a reduction to required parking from 193 spaces to 104 spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C, and a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Gulf to Bay Blvd. from 15 ft to 7.29 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Duncan Ave. from 10 ft to 5.53 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along the west from 5 ft to 4.77 ft (to existing pavement), and a reduction to the required foundation landscape area along the north side of the West Marine building from 5 ft to 3 ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G.. (Proposed Use: Addition of a 20,050 sq-ft office building [existing 22,209 sq-ft retail sales and services - West Marine]) at 1721 Gulf to Bay Blvd., Suburb Beautiful Replat of Blk D Pt of Tract A Desc Beg NE Cor of Tr A Th S02DE 342 ft. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-07044 4. Forrest R. Garrison, Trustee (Greg Jung, Earth Wash) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit limited vehicle service (car wash) in addition to existing offices and retail sales and services in the Commercial (C) District with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to existing shed) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to existing dumpster enclosure), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 8 feet (to existing shed), from 20 ft to 11 ft (to existing shuffleboard courts) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to existing concrete pad) and deviations to allow back-out parking into the US Highway 19 right-of- way, to allow car wash bays to face US Highway 19 and to allow the car wash contiguous to residentially zoned property, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-704.C, and reductions to perimeter buffers along US Highway 19 (east) from 15 ft to zero ft, along the north property line from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to existing shed) and from 5 ft to 4 ft (to existing dumpster enclosure) and along the west property line from 10 ft to 8 ft (to existing shed) and from 10 ft to zero feet (to existing concrete pad), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec. 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Conversion and expansion of a drive-thru restaurant to a car wash, in addition to existing offices and retail sales and services) at 18740 and 18746 US Highway 19 N. 19-29-16, M & B, 410-0910. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-07043 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.ciranicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad. 10/06/06 FLD2006-05029; 48 ALLEN, CAROL D MWBAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL 1 IlAMPTON RD 21 N PARK PLACE BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3910 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3917 BROWN-19 17757 US HWY 19 N # 275 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6592 CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS RETI 3645 RUFFIN RD # 310 SAN DIEGO CA 92123 - 1887 CARR-DIAZ, DAVID BAILEY, COLLEEN 308 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4005 CLEARWATER APT I LTD PO BOX 1015 HORSHAM PA 19044 - 8015 CROMER, EDMUND D 204 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4003 EILER, TIMOTHY C EILER, KAREN A 208 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4003 GLENBOROUGH FUND VIII 400 S EL CAMINO REAL SAN MATEO CA 94402 - 1704 HIGHWOODS/FLORIDA HOLDINGS 3111 W MILK BLVD STE 300 TAMPA FL 33607 - LYNCH, BELINDA M BOWENS, HELEN L 118 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4001 CLANT INC 400 W 15TH ST # 1700 AUSTIN TX 78701 - 1678 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION SONDRA KERR, PRESIDENT, P.O. BOX 8204 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 DE LOACH, VELMA J 212 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4003 FAMILY INTEREST, THE INC 1211 WESTSHORE BLVD STE 315 TAMPA FL 33607 - 4615 HAMPTON CENTER INC 3001 EXECUTIVE DR # 250 CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 5324 IMT-LB CENTRAL FLORIDA PORTFOL 13400 VENTURA BLVD SHERMAN OAKS CA 91423 - 6205 MACDILL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 9927 DELANEY LAKE DR TAMPA FL 33619 - 5071 0 BROWN ASSOC LTD II KENNEDY ASSOC LTD PO BOX 1021 LARGO FL 33779 - 1021 CARPENTER, DAVID N CARPENTER, EUNICE A 1922 WHIPPLE AVE NW CANTON OH 44708 - 2800 CLANT INC PO BOX 916464 LONGWOOD FL 32791 - 6464 CLEARWATER-PARK ASSOCIATES 200 WITMER RD HORSHAM PA 19044 - 2249 DIXON, WILSON E DIXON, MARY F 201 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4004 GABRIEL, ROBERT G GABRIEL, MARGARET A 7 HAMPTON RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3910 HAMPTON ROAD DEV LLP 107 HAMPTON RD STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4960 LAURA, LYNNE A 221 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4004 MC CANN, CATHERINE GUBITOSI, PHILIP 535 59TH ST BROOKLYN NY 11220 - 3821 MILES-ROYAL BREEZE MYERS, SAMUEL F OPTIQUEST INC PO BOX 262315 213 DAVID AVE 3950 SAYWOOD CT TAMPA FL 33685 - 2315 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4004 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 1059 OTERO, GLADYS MARIA 621 102ND TER PINELLAS PARK FL 33782 - PARK PLACE LAND LTD 3250 MARY ST 5TH FL COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 - 5232 POSCICH, JOAN M 205 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4004 SCHIERENBECK, TY J 216 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4003 •PADGETT-WHITE, SHEILA I 111 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4002 PEGO, MANUEL P PEGO., CATALINA 217 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4004 PREVETTE, LAWRENCE E JR 200 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER•FL 33759 - 4003 SYLA, GEMB 927 WOODBRIDGE CT SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 2958 M PARK PLACE BLDG LTD 3225 AVIATION AVE STE 700 COCONUT GROVE FL 33133 - 4741 POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, ESQ., JOHNSON P.O. BOX 1368 CLEARWATER, FL 33757-1368 PREVETTE, LAWRENCE E PREVETTE, BONNIE J 115 DAVID AVE CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4002 WYATT REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC 1211 WESTSHORE BLVD STE 314 TAMPA FL 33607 - 4615 XIONG, KHOU H XIONG, KHOU H PARK ISLE CONDO DEVELOPMENT, 3001 VIRGINIA AVE XIONG, KANG YOUN LLC CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4336 110 DAVID AVE C/O FSS & R INC. CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4001 PO BOX 450233 ATLANTA, GA, 31145 0 LONG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT RrvlrW CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST O!'!'IcE BOX 4748, CL ARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI.r AVENUE, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TIa.FPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 November 9, 2006 Mr. Steve Williamson, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2006-05029 100 and 101 Park Place Boulevard Dear Mr. Williamson: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On October 17, 2006, the Community Development Board reviewed your request for Flexible Development approval for the Termination of Status of Nonconformity (1) to permit the continuation of 390 attached dwelling units in the Commercial, Office and Preservation Districts, (2) to permit a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces), where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces), (3) to permit two multi-family development signs to remain at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted) and (4) to permit a prohibited sign to remain within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard with a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, under the provisions of Section 6-109.C. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Conditions of Approval: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 26.99 acre subject property is located on both sides of Park Place Boulevard, south of Drew Street and north of Gulf to Bay Boulevard; 2. That the majority of the property on the west side of Park Place Boulevard (100 Park Place Boulevard) is zoned Office (O) District, with only a small portion on the south side zoned Commercial (C) District; 3. That the majority of the property on the east side of Park Place Boulevard (101 Park Place Boulevard) is zoned Commercial (C) District, with the northern portion zoned Office (O) District and the wetland/pond zoned Preservation (P) District; 4. That the property was developed in 1998 with a total of 390 attached dwelling units; 5. That the Commercial and Office Districts do not allow attached dwellings as a permitted use, therefore, the existing attached dwellings are a nonconforming use; 6. That approval of the request will allow the reconstruction of dwellings in the event of a loss or damage of 50 percent or more of the value of the buildings; 7. That there is no desire to construct additional dwelling units, but to simply have a. Code conforming use; FRANK I111MARD, MAYOR J(mN fDoR;AN, C0 Ncu.,w:.wsri< I-IM-1 I1AMIL'ION, C()1 N(:iLM0lith:H 13ii.i. joNSo\, OwNciLml;NliIP:it C: i,,u:N A. Yrn;r. rN, C( Nc:ii.mrNmrr. "EQUAL hN4Pi.0YN1l:N r AND ArrLi,NLATivi[ Acno N FIMITO) H," November 9, 2006 Williamson - Page Two 8. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; 9. That currently a parking ratio of 1.77 parking spaces per dwelling unit (total of 693 spaces) exists, where two spaces per dwelling unit are required (780 spaces). There does not appear to be any known issues of inadequate parking for this development; 10. That additional uncounted parking within detached garages "behind" open, surface parking and parking outside of garages part of the attached dwelling buildings should be counted toward the overall number of parking spaces provided and that such uncounted parking should remain in place in the future; 11. That two multi-family development signs, considered monument signs, exist (one at each entrance) at a height of 11 feet (where a maximum of six feet high is permitted) and with an area of 45 square feet (where a maximum of 24 square feet is permitted); 12. That these on-site monument signs are consistent with the scale of the entrance features they are attached to and their sign area is in context to their location over 70 feet each from the front property lines; 13. That a sign exists within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way at Gulf to Bay Boulevard at a height of six feet and an area of 45 square feet, which was permitted by a variance in 1997 to be constructed; 14. That the sign within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard near Gulf to Bay Boulevard is listed as a prohibited sign under Section 3-1806.L; 15. That this existing sign within the right-of-way of Park Place Boulevard near Gulf to Bay Boulevard is attractive and provides direction to the attached dwelling complex; and 16. That there are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the Standards and Criteria as per Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code; and 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Section 3-913 of the Community Development Code. Conditions of Approval: 1. That, within 90 days of CDB approval, an application be submitted for building permits to construct handicap sidewalk access between building, common facilities and the public sidewalk within the Park Place Boulevard right-of-way, in a location and manner acceptable to the Engineering and Planning Departments, including the submission of a tree survey to minimize tree impacts; and 2. That sufficient parking be retained by having all uncounted parking spaces (within detached garages "behind" open, surface parking and parking outside of garages part of the attached dwelling buildings) remain in place. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within the time frame set forth in Condition #1 above. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. November 9, 2006 Williamson - Page Three The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CD13 meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expired on October 31, 2006 (14 days from the date of the CD13 meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. Sincerely, -? Michae Delk, P Planning Director S.•IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslPark Place Blvd 100& 101 Park Isle Condominiums (C, 0& P) - ApprovedlPark Place Blvd 100 & 101 Development Order 11.9.06.doc ~LI~ aoo6-D~pa . 1 ~ ~ LE LEND LEGAL -DE~CRIPVION ~ . fl'~ DREW:aTI~ET I. -ALL ELEVATIONS. REFER TO NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM- (NGVDj. 14. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AT APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS IN ' - - - - - - - - - - - JURISDICTION LINE LINE Lot 2'and Lot 3 of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE accordingg to the - map or plat thereof as recorded in Plan Book 109 at' Rage 10 of the public records ~T ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE MANUAL OF UNIFORM`TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 2. THE LOCATION. OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN AND IT IS THE AS ADOPTED BY'THE .FLORIDA DEPT. OF TRANS. UNDER RULE 14-115.010, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO .DETERMINE THE EXACT. LOCATION OF THE EXISTING PAVING UTILITIES -PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN THEIR VICINITY.. THE CONTRACTOR-SHALL 15. THE. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS JURISDICTION LINES- AS SHOWN HEREON WERE TAKEN FROM-PREVIOUS SURVEY BY VINE of Pinellas. County,' Florida:: ~ PROJECT ,N ITE NOTIFY ALL UTILITY- COMPANIES IN THE AREA BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.. KING ENGINEERING ASSOC., INC. DATED JUNE 28;1991; 'AND WERE PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED BY THE PROPOSED PAVING ARMY -CORPS OF ENGINEERS. REVALADATION OF. JURISDICTION LINES WILL BE PERFORMED. AVING ZONING LEGEND - ~ 3. ALL MATERUlLS AND.CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY FUTURE PAVING OF CLEARWATER STANDARDS AND .SPECIFICATIONS. 16. CON70URS ARE BASED OF SWFWMD AERIAL INFORMATION.DETAILED TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS SHALL BE LNG CC o COBI{BERCIAL :CENTRAL .DISTRICT ~ CG o COY~IERCIAL QENERAL DISTRICT ~ T E SANITARY SEWER AND POTABLE WATER WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF INCLUDED ON THE FINAL SITE PLAN. r ~ CLEARWATER. ~ 17-. ~ ~ - A MINIMUM OF A 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR- ALL. ON-SITE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES CH n COaIBERCAR HIQHWAY DISTRICT o a 00 m QENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT w DENOTES PROJECT. AREA. 5. ALL PROPOSED SANITARY LINES ARE.B-INCH DIAMETER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 18. ALL SUBSTANDARD .SIDEWALKS AND SIDEWALK RAMPS ADJACENT TO 0 PART OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE OJECT AREA OS/R ¦ OPEN SPACE /.RECREATIONAL DISTRICT ~ Q~PG ~ a a BROUGHT UP TO STANDARD PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE` OF CERTIFICATE Sj OF OCCUPANCY. 6. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LATERALS ARE 6-INCH DIAMETER UNLESS OTHERWISE P ¦ PRESERVE. x P/8P o PUBLIC /SEMI-PUBLIC . x c PARK NOTED. 19. $ACK FLOW PREVENTION DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED BY THE CITY WITH. APPLICABLE FEES PAID- BY THE OWNER. RD" m. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICE -PARK a J PLACE 7. SITE LANDSCAPING WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 136.023 OF THE CITY OF 20. PRIOR- TO ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY AS-BUILTS AND ENGINEERS'CERTI IC I Rdl-18 .o AfULTIPLE FAMILY .RESIDENTIAL "16" DISTRICT. m R~1-12 o rBULTIPLE -FAIBILY RESIDENTIAL "12" DISTRICT QIA.F-TO•BAY BLVD. CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. LANDSCAPE AND PLANTING PLANS WILL TO BE PROVIDED TO THE E GINEER SITE PL I _ F AT ON ARE BE PREPARED BY A LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. N AN . REV EW. RM-24 ~ 11ULTIPLE FAMILY :RESIDENTIAL "24" DISTRICT 21. ALL PARKING STALLS SHALL BE PAINTED WITH 6" STRIPING 8. LOCATION OF THE TRASH COMPACTOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY OF RPD-10 a RESIDENTIAL PLANNED: DEYELOPMENT - 1@ UPA RPD-18 m RESIDENTIAL. PLANNED DEVELOPIENT 1a UPA CLEARWATER SANITATION DEPARTMENT AND WILL BE SCREENED IN 22. ACCORDANCE WITH THE. CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUIREMENTS. STOP BARS SHALL BE 24 INCHES WIDE AND PAINTED WHITE. RPD-16. n RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 16 .UPA 23. A NOTICE. GENERAL PERMIT WILL BE SUBMITTED TO SWFWMD FOR THE SWMS. A DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT WILL BE 9. THE SITE 15 LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD=ZONE "X" AREAS OF 500-YEAR FLOOD+ ARES OF. SUBMITTED. TQ THE ARMY CORE OF ENGINEERS (ACOE) FOR THE IMPACTS TO THEIR CLAIMED JURISDICTIONAL AREA. EISENH0~91ER RS-B o SINQLE FAMILY :RE8IDENTILAL 8 DISTRICT 100-YEAR FLOOD WITH AVERAGE'DEPTHS OF LE S THAN I FOOT OR WITH DRAINAGE ELEMENTARY RR RESIDENTIAL RURAL * osuio Ro ~a~ c THORpTON A-E s AGRICULTURAL ESTATE R~8IDENTIAL AREAS .LESS THAN I SQUARE MILE, AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES. FROM 100-YEAR , . ~ .FLOOD) AS SHOWN ON FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP -PANEL 125096-0012 D, II~,1 I SCHOOL DATED AUGUST 19, 1991. I * A-E IS AN UNINCORPORATED ZONE * RR IS AN UNINCORPORATED -ZONE. TAMPA 10. ALL PRACTICABLE AND NECESSARY EFFORT SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION I~ j TO CONTROL AND PREVENT EROSION AND TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO SURFACE i I I soua~ BAY DRAINS AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER- EROSION AND SILTATION RM 1S I RPD-18 I CONTROL POLICY. ( IO ~ ( Rt8 16 I P/SP R'~ iS I VICIfVITY MAP II. NO TREE REMOVAL OR LAND ALTERATION SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL A PERMIT HAS IC I BEEN ISSUED BY'THE CITY OF CLEARWATER CITY CODE CHAPTER 98. I I I I I ( ) I~ 1 - I NTS 12. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE PAINTED WITH 6" WIDE STRIPING. I~ I 13. ALL STOP SIGNS SHA L BE 36"x36" I S A SHA S G Q I RIB 18 OS/R OS/R ~ AND SHALL MEET CURRENT REGULATORYISTANDARDSLL BE T ABOVE FINI HED RADE. I~ I I EDDIE C. MOORE RECREATION COMPLEX __,I 0 PA DREW STREET 0 I ~ I - - - m II i ~~..---L_ J"---- RPD-B 6; U .,III I : PA ~ I _ ZI` W III I ~T ~----r ~ I I u I LOT 1 ~t i~ J` LU I•. ,pp ~ n~ I'I I u. I , Z OPHTHALNIIC$, N I, i ~ • III f ~ II I I , PARK PLACE ~1 , , JOE GRECO LTD. PARTNERSHIP I I P.B. 109, PGS 10-11 ~'I-'- I I I II ? I I ~ I I I u AND HERBERT BROWN I i" I I e.rlw I I I II III . I ~ 1 1 I C10 LAWRENCE DICKSON > ' I STORZ OPTHALMICS INC. I ~ I I ~'1°I~ 1 II ~1I 3333 W. KENNEDY BLVD. # 206 CIO JAMES NA5H C~ r' I I '4' TAMPA,. FL. 33609 1 I AMERICAN CYANAMID .PLAZA' i ~ ~ I `1 ' I I d ~ WAYNE, NJ 07470 l p ~ I CC .I p l I I ~ ` P010 .,•~1; 1 I ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ roo 20o aoo ' ~ 1 RD I I ~ ~ Palo `~i I ~ ~ ~ GI RPD-10 I ~ \ ~ I I ~ ~ Ise SCALE: I = 200 ~ 1 1~; ? I I I_- - - - ~ • 1 1 1 101 . ~ ~ ~ ! ill \ . ~ ~ / I I ~ ~ ~ / ! I~ ~ L_ - ~ IGI SHEET _3 OF 3 LANDINGS, CLEARWATER ~ ~ ~ ~ I Ipl . SUITE 210,E Rt'5-24 LOT 3 1 IF-1I 300 BROADWAY`.,, :~---r~ - a ~ iD' 1 .n STORZ OPHTHALMICS INC. NASHVILLE, TN. 37201- + ; . ICI PARK` PLACE' PPlD ~ '~Q' I P.B. 109,::Pd8 10-11 lyl EXISTING ZONING RPD-16 P„p I PRESERVATION ZONING PER ORDINANCE 6028-98 I TO REMAIN • 1..1 t I ~ T:: P I I - I-~~I I weTEaro c i 3A a. \ I , , CITY- OF CLEARWATER I P/SP I I EXISTING ZONING RPD-1S = P.O. BOX 4748 ~~:~A~AT~r A~ = I I PER ORDINANCE Q028 90 - CLEARWATER,.. FL. 34618 Q ; AMAX EASEIEH I I t ~ `NATLIiAL AAEA'. I I zoraw u+E: ~ zoHP,a LHE ~ ~ a 'Era I 1 I I 1 _ / ~ CC - _ _ (UNDEVELOPED) CC SHEET 2 F 3 I C I UNDEVELOPED ~ ( ) EXISTING ZONING RPD-18 I I LOT 2~ PER ORDINANCE 8028-86 I STORZ OPHTHAhMIC3 ~IIVF:- ~ ~ 1 I I PARK PLACE I I s PARK PLACE LAND INC. 1 I N ~ _ 109, Pt38.10-11 s ~ I I~ ~ ~ CLINTON INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. I I W ~ 50 WEST IDLEWILD AVE. SUITE 100: I I EXIST.: OUTFACE SYSTEM Z I I N TAMPA, FL. 33614 / ° (a ~ wETEA~n A i I ~ , nQ E ,nS Sv . ~ ! Q ~ ~ I I o ~ A9 ~ CC I I _ F ~ ~ ~ PA ~ r (UNDEVELOPED). 1 1 3 - , ~ ~ r j j 0 1 v~ ti o ~ • ) J , I o I ~ N 5~ r 11 RS-S o I U ~ 1 C~ ` ~ tJ ! ~ ` oo„~P . . 1 / i ~ ~ ~ CC ~ Pob Q ; ~ ~ ~ I I o I I ~ 1 IJ ~ ~i i~ ~ m w I / V ~ / ~ ` CC ~ I ( m N I ~ ~ UNDEVELOPED •s I I S ' ~ CC ( j I I I y 0] ~ ~ - ~ W i . ~ ; - MIST. ¢ o ~ . ~r / r ~ D ENTION Z I I ! u! I ~ Z PARK PLACE LAND, INC.. AREA I I Q1 6 I I % 1 ! 1 . . I ~ EK PA ~ POb ~ CLINTON INTERNATIONAL GROUP,. IN ~ ~ 0 I I • I 550 WEST I I I SITE PLAN APP~O~ED V , I I DLEWILD AVE. SUITE I CC m ~ LJ'L~ M ; I • `1---- --r1 TAMPA FL. 3 4 I 1 RS-S -CASE # _FLD?.co ~ ~ oso Zg Q ~ I I 3 61 I I w W ~ I I .rl I I CH ~ ~-------lt1t-_ ~ 12 CASE TYPE 5 z c~ 1 n_ - 0. 'Qf`-- . I DRC DATE to Zq t) b ORIGINAL U n I ~ '.I CDB DATE RECEn~Ia m ~ ~ ~ I ~ di . _Pr I I ~ ( I r~ I ~ I 1 '1 r I I I I I I ~ _ I 1 r--- I `i I I 1 I I. 1 I I I I I I I _ si~NATURE ~ SEP 07 2006. a a ( k706TPq i °eu ~ K'iG 1 CG 1 c I I i~ l I I ' I I I i I CG i i I DATE i o o rc canna I I q j~ f1 ~ I I I 1. ~ I ` I I is I I ?ao o ~ I 1 I ~ I~ I CG CG CO N I C~ I I I I I I lal I 6 I I. I• PLAPINING ~EP/~t1lvlENi 1 II 1 I 1 1 1 I. w II I I I I ~ z I r^ PA 1 1 _ _ ~ I 11 ~,f ~ I d Z-~ I I~ 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER - I F~ U - o LJ~ ~ I ~ I~I o N I (J ~ I 1 f ~ N ~-c------------°-- - - 3 N ~[mna PA PA~'\ 'o Q. ri ~ GULF TO 8AY BOULEVARD -`SR SO m Z W m z a z N W ARCHITE T ~ C OWNER /DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGI E . NE R /PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE LANDSCWPE ARCHITECT z l0 Y LAND USE AMENDMENT a „ DONALD H. LANG, AIA ARCHITECTURE DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES / LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORP.. KING NGI E NEERING ASSOC. INC. PAUL L. VERLANDER m ~ 33 S.E. 7 TH ST. SUITE f IIOI NORTH LAKE DESTINY DRIVE SUITE 400 24945 U5 HWY. 19 N. PRIOR TO THE FINAL .CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY - 1208 BENT OAK TRAIL m BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33432 MAITLAND, FLORIDA 32751 CLEARWATER FLORIDA 34624 FOR THE PROJECT, A LAND USE. PLAN AMENDMENT z ~ CONTACTS MR DONALD LANG CONTACTS MR CHRIS. DEL GUIDICE ALTAMONTE SPRINGS; FLORIDA 32714 CONTACT MR JONATHAN J.' GOTWALD P.E. CONTACTS MR PAUL VERLANDER IYILL BE REQUESTED FOR THE RESIDENTIAL m a PHONE ~ 407-750-0036 MR SAL LeCESSE PHONE ~ 813-791-1441 PHONE + 407-294-2722 a ~ ~ PHONE :407-660-8666 COMPONENT AND-ANY ADDED PRESERVATION AREAS. ' a s°. ~j g - u~aior~o mE swxaru~ ~ >~xe qualm caNrna oFFkER IN THIS SPACE ,ae ND. a RWA INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED KINGENGIMEERIMG ASSOCIArES, INCW UAwM PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED co 9 THE .G.RA'm.k'D RESERVE AT. PARK PLA4 Co °`JLWICAD AND THAT. CONSTRUCTION IS En Surveyors Sci n' FOR Planners ' rstects e t sts • Landscape Architects K PLACE ??eo-oo?-ooo FIELD BBOK W. FINAL SITE PLAN 'n CNIECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES m RWA 24945 U.S. 19 N. 5010 West Kennedy Blvd. .8406 Massachusetts Ave. 3 9-05-06 ADDED HANDICAP ACCESS PER CITY COMMENTS 1 E Clearwater, FL. 34623 Suite 200 Suite A-2 LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ' MASTER PLAN 2 9-24-96 REV. PER. CITY DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW DA 4-10-96 oC (813) 791-1441 Tompo, FL. 33609 New Port Richey, FL: 34653 z JJG (813) 282-0111 (813) 846-094 ~~T10~ I` 4-30-96 REV. PER. CITY DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW scnLE, z z NO. DATE REVMM 1"=200 S APPD OF g By n. EXISTING PROPOSED _ . BRICK PAVER I CURVE DATA BRICK PAVER MEDIAN "ON-SITE" BRICK CURVE. RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING. DELTA SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 15" RCP V PI w- PAVER ROADWAY STORM SEWER INLET BQ BAY ~ ~ w' LIMITS AND DESIGN CI 2000.00' 13.89' 6.94' 13.89' N309'S6"E OC°_3'52" ~0 BE DETERMINED C2 365.00' 97.67 49.13'.. 97,38' N2?28'03"E 199'54" x s'' sA C EAN `i ~ EN' v SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 8"SAN ~ .CHINA BERRY Ib• az o OUT... CI • - AT A LATER. DATE) EX. 8" WM C.O.. O CITRUS G (V o le WATER MAIN -s"WM ® DEAD ~ w C y . Q'.~ / PI ~s' 250' LEFT TURN LANE IA ® MYRTLE ~ oA s• N FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION (FDC) FDC B• FH °O OAK O5. b. P 5' CONC: SIDEWALK 25' BUILDING . ACK I-~ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY FHA 0 PALM ~ AND F NT ( ) FHA NT ACK PI PINE' • TOP OF BANK (TOB) ura UNKNOWN D b• ~ w 10 ' PROPOSED 8": wM EXTENSION ~QT 0 P 0 i o• ` ~ 6•b• ACOE JURISDICTION IMITS NIA. i 15 BUILDING SETBACK 'e ° s b~. \ ° r (APPROXIMATE i ) PARK PLACE ~ . PI ~ PI NfA BUILDING NUMBER 14 ` \ ~ p,\\ PI PI 16' PI 18 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ PARIC PLACE. BLVD. IS SHOWN fOR la- INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. RIND WILL r t ,~io b` BE SUBJECT TO A SEPARATE. PERMIT. TRACT I OF PHASE I \ ~ / • PI \ NIA NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 6 ~ ,i \ PROPOSED 6' N CHAIN LINK FENCE `~o~ ;a Q „ ~ ~ \ IN BUILDING SETBACK \ ; 9 / S ~ q.Q \ DA 0 25 50 _ 100 73 ur.,: ~ _ NlA s~ . , N, F ~l/ ~ 0 \ .INTERIOR LANDSCAPING ~ « EX. e.. sA k e, a•. ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ s\ \ ~ r~` ENTRAN ° R~ TORE LL \ ~ gT CH SCALES I° ~ 50' ~ ' ` \ S / SqN M \ ~ ~ N ~ \ ~0 \ ~ SAN. ~ \ / ~ It \ q' zo SIGN 8 e ' ea ~ ST I~' BAR TY ~'T ' • sF 250' LEFT TURN LANE PI 0 ~ S NIA CONCRETE .r= \ 4 6, ~ \ 0 \ N ~ 0~. G MJ Q0e s / S \ ~ \ a „k;~.~ O° e ~ ~ ~ T PEDESTRIAN GATE AT CONC. WALK NlA WETLAND FILL AR A Ex. SAN MH ~ oA • / ~ 20~ s.. Sin o p ~ a o o \ E ~ RIM :36.5+ - ~ LE.: 31.50(SW) PI or ' a v \ ~ \ r \ a~ ~ ~ p~ F PROPOSED DECORATIVE FENCE'' LE. ~ 31.60 (NE,PLUG) ~ 0~' ~ ® Q ~3g s• \r 0/ ° oA s b : ~ R \(~rF c' 80~RC~ 3 WITHIALUMINUM PI KET8SBETWEEN COLUMNS. ,~iv PA; "F" TYPE CURB TYP.: 9 0 ~ ~/`r0 \ r\ oA B' ~ \ ° \ ~ 2 ° `t ` N~,n~. 4\T DAb ~ r LANDSCAPED BY GRAND RESERVE CONNECT TO EX. 8" WM "t PI b ~ ~t~~ ~ PI 6WC~ W~ rbDf SGWDAID Pik-0NIIED OA 4' II dSrBLfD PAAI6ND 9p1 E X I S T I (V G 6 S TO R Y / 0 ° b 0 A ~ D A q„ rwle eamta ~ 7 , .1 ! a ox !/u' nsCK 9EkT o 18 e ~ r o f7 B'S1GN B o \ \ ' aA ~s ~ ` r ~ OV A rROPOSED 8" WM EXTENSION t SAIB01. ~ ~ •d ' NUJiIUy / ~ A , OFFICE BUILDING ~ ~ ~ . ~ ,b• R b- . a ~ PI A ~ ~ ~ ~JLt~RdW`~I V `Ql 6,.. IB W ~ 0 ~ Q~ OA 4 S ° . 4• \ PI .k BU.CIf BOMkR DISABILD a ZB ~ 0 . ~ . q PI R\\ \ ~ . a} z"° \ o, r ~FO` a~/j~ R~ 5' CONC. SIDEWALK N DE PI ^I t \ 114 ~'w. 4C.A ~ 94ptCR0UIC PEI61i Q \ P, f OA IS PI \ BUdf BOISfB ~ ~ ~ p" 0 OI. \.F "S7~L N4, 4~w \ P~ OA AIA.`` T ~ 6 .nTf. r c ~F ~ ~ ~ . ~Q.. ,012 ~ \ OAT Oa 4- PI ~ ~SCgp 0 ~Q. T s, ~ OA ° a ° q- V r~7^ - Ib' ~ 1".~8, / _ 8 - v - ° A ~ OAS V' ~ -Q' \ p IS ~..,~t0 T 5` oA6 oa ~ \ BGFF C~ FR i b e s'. ~ X44. - ul.lrx~s y b W~ PI /.(aS ~ \ ~y, 7(/ V e Qg ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 0 - F,Q b J.B,bO~ , ~ 4` 4` 4' 3 4 .•,f~ uum /r'~w r xor oPPm Buv w• t c B o ° : ~3 \ \ ~ ~ 0 ~ /r•`\ OAS ~ ' 3.4,8` 1 y' c a''~,`~, \v u SW7DARD MTl01R b1EF4 PPE - ` / OA PI ~ R " °.v' ' 2 G ` 4 KEEP- RIGHT SIGN ~0~ - ' ~'~WATFR 1N a , P ~ 0 .i I ~ / t, ~ TO ~ SIGN a G O 3•`\\`~ `.q b b` © b' 4 A" 0 r w.. OP .BAR ( C N/~. 3 ~ 9~ + o ~ ' I k . „ 5•: ~ . muss ~ , EX. 8" SAN, i' 4' P 1Tf a:~l I, m I axY-b caur,~ wss. ~ 6 tS Pi . S r GV I= III ' I k' (I ~ pax roP a wss uvo. 020: 3 ~ ° B / / / ~ ~ ~P 51 \ - I I - N uml A suaN PNSED +rwl 0 ~w , GP' pP~ \ ; .:x,, III I P ArPrromumr l~• ~ /4 A b g 5 J k . , tEYtT. BF TNG/SOD. / ~ o ~ \ I 0 \ ~ \ a~£'~jr '.5 Of - `~~"7G V OA ~OA ~•s~~.~_ u ; EX. SAN MH - oA ~ o ° 16, \ \ \ ~ 8' Y i RIM' - 33: + PI a. ~ s• ~ l4, ~C \ a LE, - 27.52 S) I (V oA 9 ~ 5' CONC. SIDEWALK ~ \ \ r` `0 4. 4 b' 6 ° e P'~ ; .I MODULAR BLOCK ~ ' ' LE. = 27.62 NE,PL,UG) M ' Pq• I (7 1 e' VACANT ' c B ~ ' r F DA f S _ ~ ~ I RETAINING WALL / 10 LANDSCAPE BUFFE P 4, ~ Q~ Q o n . b• Cp LIGHTING, .SIGNAGE AND AVEMENT ' c \ 5 P PI ~~t~r5, bg'~j ~ MARKINGS. FOR PARK PACE BLVD. HANDICAPPED SIGN DE'~All. B• / - . .P 6 a . q 4. \ . ~ ' 0~ o ~ EXISTING WILL BE DESIGNED A PART OF / EX. WETLAND TO BE FILLED 0.70 AC. o ~ b °~a• ~ ~ oA ~ EXISTING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT THE CONSTRUCTION LAN PROCESS / O4 \ \ ipW 7 5 ~ o ~ TOP OF BANK SYSTEM / PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED 6 ~ ~ ~ ~i .PARK PLACE PI A ~ r o I / 4 _ ak! e•`` D`~ ~ ~ W EXISTING / 9 / T \ o ~ WEIR ~ \ TRASH ROOM DAILY TRANSFER b• / B• oA a7 ~ \ TRACT I OF PHASE I PROPOSED 6' H CHAIN LINK FENCE O 1 ~ OF SOLID WASTE TO THE PI F I ~ ' COMPACTOR .LOCATED WEST IN BUILDING SETBACK / w / A ~yQ / r 21 OF PARK PLACE BLVD. WILL q. I o b" \ q,lr ~"I 1 o e• BE PREFORMED BY ON-SITE .O J / 4• MAINTENANCE STAFF. PRO / I 'N B' ~ e '0.J eYa, EX. TOP OF BANK ° NO ° 0415911 E POSED SIAMEES CONNECTION AND r, u 1 ~ ; AF, . B CHECK VALVES {TYP.) ~ err / ° ~ ~ J ~ - ~ ~ / fl 0 4 PI ~ PI ©r \ / A I O! 5 Ily A 6 S 6 S ° ~ ~6 FO b' t° N 0° 38 34 E I q~ OA 4` PI C ~r ~9 B B 3'; r 0 N 3m . q ~ _ I .b 0te .~\OS©p• R GeG ST ,r .06' I k\ s PARK PLACE p /t ~ b" / 1 P "6• ~ gR~O~NORY 's ~ i APPROX• ACOE JD LINE ( I ~M _ TRACT I I A OF PHASE I 0 b• \ , r P PI ` b• ' gCFJG~ ADDITIONAL WETLAND BUFFER Z ~ . I I B' ~ ~ ~ PI p / 02 q. n ONC ~ I~ 0 A b ~ ~ I 4" 6 ~ 4 6 ` • \ _ °~e- ~°~a•-°A / PROVIDED 525 SF OD I a a / ~''IDtOV D DA SOOE SFAND BUFFER 'P ~ ~ I o I ~ • C7 / ! 1 e o CONCRETE ~ b• ue I ®o.. s MEDIA VACANT _ 0 ~ of ; ~ ~ / ~ 1 ~pP L r OA / Q s• o N ~ Q J q' / y b• , 12 ~ co 00 \ 0 ~j a I w b 4` . / N ~ I ~ , - to I yC y a ~ / " to °A I 44 0 B 0- ~D REDUCTION IN WETLAND ~ tn ~ ~ q• , l4 S ~ x PROPOSEQ t° oA ROOL MAINT. C11NG 4 A a T~ r; ' ~ ~ BUFFER 700 SF. I v I m ~ 0 STORMWATER t~. ~j,~ ~ °E ° • MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL MATCH EX. PAVEMENT A MANAGEMENT / ~ s~.'" 'y ~ 1 • « 41182 y . b "`l~ 'E 0 0 o FACILITY 400 p 4• ~ „ . G' o~ ~ ° (LOCATION APPROXIMATE / J~',~0 ~ I " • • EX. TOP OF BANK I ~ r .,1 1 ~ Q ~ ~ ' Q' 4 DA OA "7 4 PROPOSED 10' SIDEWALK 8 15 BUILDING SETBACK S3 , r~ 4l ~ • ? " ' ~ / APPROX. ACOE JD LINE ' ~ " ' ~ ~ PROPOSED DECORATIVE FENCE' e• o TILITY EASEMENT ~0 5 ~ b o ~ ~I oN~ ~ ~ ~s, I ry y \ I 6' I CONSISTING-OF 2'x2' MASONRY COLUMNS N72b25'3$"E ~ I ad I ~ WITH ALUMINUM PICKETS BETWEEN COLUMNS. I .991_ 1 I p N~ PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE. TYP. S , 0'~ ~ p P EX. WETLAND TO BE FILLED 0.54 AC. W ~ J = o p o'+, 0~ QJQ A w `ti ' t. ~ / E O V . OA 13 10 I 1 ~ ' s. 5' CONC.. SIDEWALK PI s• Ed' S~ 4 ~0 ~ 4 • ®b' ~ \ 12 w • y DOMESTIC WATER 2 ~s s' a PI c / PREVIOUSLY .PERMITTED ~ I I d a a- I I pa M °E B o ~ METERS (IIUNIT TYP.) ° r ~ I VIN I N w J o ~ ~ 12 F I / r o , ° F- V r o - ~ • b• B' ~ ~ .100' LEFT TURN LANE ~ 0 ti 4 3 ~ T ~ TACTILE WARNING. STRIP S f I-- - - - - - - '9AF VACANT 8 FLUSH CURB TYP. lz e ) o lrNi I I ~ I ~ t- 5 ~ ~ R ~ ( ) ~ I ~ ~ _ ~ / 3 r ~ a ~ ~ I ~ I Q o SO• 10 LANDSCAPE BUFFER W I ~ ~ >i ~ T a P ~ TOO BE ~VED ~ 25' 1 n I I o Q R i ~~pl CONSERVATION AND DRAINAGE. EASEMENT S59° 39 1~ E I I ( "NATURAL AREA" 167 . $ ( I a I 15' BUILDING SETBACK Ow. w ~ ~ / \ ~ oa s• ~ I _ (P V2T ON ZONING) I 1 \ o A ~ ~ ~ L 1--~ cv ~ Q m o / ~ ~ w c ' .DECORATIVE FOUNTAIN IN POND (EXISTING) 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~W I I - a f 5' CONC. SIDEWALK ~ . PROPOSED 6' H CHAIN. LINK FENCE ~ ~ ` N m PEDESTRIAN GATE AT 0 N PI aub ~ / , rn °z ` ~ ~ ~ TO HAMPTON ROAD ( APPROX, ACOE JD LINE / , vn\\ r \ \ ~ j a. m a \ l 1 \ \ m O ' ~ / 1 \ ~ ~ N \ ~ \ \ \ oQ ' ISLAND TO BE IRRIGATED a c F ~ NDSCAPED BY GRAND RESERVE \Fk L ~ \ \ w ~ ~ ~ \ \ m \ ~ 9" PROPOSED OUTFALL ~ z ~ \ ~ ~ ~ STRUCTURE USED OUTFALL \ \ \ ` ~ ~ \ ~ ~ \ TORE o u \ \ ^ e PI POSED 8" WM EXTENSION \ \ ~ EXISTING ' \ \ m °z \ \ 0~ O a a• ~r EX. TOP OF BANK Q a ~ N P \ e' m N \ \ • , • o, PI BRICK PAVER MEDIAN ~ • wEIR 1 EX, TOP OF BANK. \ ~ ~ \ ~ Q \ ~ PI b w• ~ ~ ~ APPROX. ACOE JD LINE • a Z \ \ \ 3 \ ~ ~ \ . r ~ ~ \ \ / \ P. CANT A \ ~J P, W \ /l ~ ti ~ \ .f a 4'CONCRETE WALK.. EXISTING ~ \ ~ \ \ / / s . ~ _ \ \ \ ~.l / ~ \ ~ \ \ } ~ ~ N 3 Sl"ORMWATER TMANAGEM P TER MANAGEMENT ~ ~ , ! ~ M ~ \ SYSTEM \ ,r - - \ \ / o N \ o SYSTEM.. N w \ \ ,J ~ PI PI - a PARK PLACE \ \ c, E° a / ~ 4• ` \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ST EXISTING \e \ \ J~~ i .~,-tip, ~ • ° ~ ORMWASYSTEM AGEMENT TRACT I OF PHASE I . ~ ~ w ~''y EX. TOP OF BANK m Z J rn ~ / \ V ~ to Z W / `P ro u. w ~ ~ 1 G UCTURE N ~ ~ ~ ~ to v GRATE II+~ET z ~ Q ~ SS' RCJ; a ~ ~ ~ RECEIVED 4) m ~ p I II - ~ S00 19 21 10° f9' 2 I IIE 564 52' ~ ~ ~ SEP 07 2006 G EXIST ` C^"" ~ r I- \ m x r' ~ t - e q w ~ ) •pa sr m a / - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - Pll~NNING DEi~ARTMENT ~ T. CIiY ®F CLEARWATER a / - - ~ DEDICATED T( ~?Me.T _ _ 144 _ - ~ Pa,~,• EDICATED TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER) ( DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE of THE oUAUf1' 0 C RWA rm- -r-wQn In I"10 twA" AMW ~ - f, INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED A~ E. AT PARK PLA ,IOS No. DRAWN co PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED MV61) VEERW VG - A SS 0 CIA rES, INC. co JLWICAD AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS - 5 9-05-06 ADDED HANDICAP ACCESS PER CITY COMMENTS ;K PLACE _ 1180-001-000 Engineers Planners • Surveyors Scientists Landscape Architects FOR 'm cfp:cNED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. 1 DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES 4 2-**-97 REV. WATER REVIEW FINAL SITE PLAN 3 24945 U.S. 19 N. 5010 West Kennedy Blvd. 8406 Massachusetts Ave. •o _ 10-16-96 ADDED TURNLANEEATPSTA.I20+50 PR BLVD: nMDBW$10 S sNT. RWA leorwater; FL. 34623 Suite 200 Suite A-2 & LECESSE DEVELOPMENT cc• 613 791-1441 Tampa, FL. 33609 ew Port Richey, FL: 34653 LOT2 2 9-20-96 REV. PER. DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW. DATE. RATION 1 4-30-96 REV. PER. DRC PREL. SITE PLAN REVIEW 4-10-96 Z JJG (813) 282-0111 (813) 846-0904 SCAM z Z S NO. DATE REVISIN A" 1"=50' BY OF g g . ~ ~ ~i APARTMENTS PROPOSED LIGHT FlXTURE TO - HAVE 90' CUTOFFS 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER DREW - is - SHOPPINQ CENTER ADJACENT. TO PARKING 260 LF PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE TO ld~ATER STORAGE _ HAVE sD' curoFFs 0 25 50 100 PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO CONNECT TO - DOMESTIC WATER - FACILlTY METERS 1 NIT TYP. N EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER PARKING LOT . PROPOSED FlRE DEPT. CONNECTION PEDESTRIAN GATE SCALE: 1" = 50' ~ PROPOSED 6' H CHAIN LINK FENCE AND. CHECK VALVES TYP, CAR WASH AREA TACTILE WARNING STRIP IN BUILDING SETBACK dt FLUSH CURB TYP. 36'x18' CONCRETE , 15 BUILDING SETBACK ' . III 5• DRAINAGE SWALE r SATEWTE DISH LOCATION A o s' Ir ~ on F .CURB TYP. p~ . , PI ~ Q FLUME 10' LANDSCAPE BuF~R] CITY OF CLEARWATER VACANT II . , ,r 48__„_ Q~ PI N00 ZZ Z8 E o' DRNNAGE SWALEI S89 54 49 W ~ , 7 5' 0• 0 .q...~. 0 ~ 5• ` 3 ` 28~`33~ \ \ ~ ~ 34 3 . 3z ^ - I II 4TH ``p a ~ &T , ~ ~ ~r,.---__ ~ - - II 50.00 - I ~ p;• - - - - 6' , a.a• ~ ~ - r=, w I~ _ EX. 30" RCP • s 5• s PI 'WALK s ~ o a~n - - - p, i ~ 0 ~ 9 / I ~ 1 1 0 q-6.6.~ ~ b,q. a, : -'T_ 0 D ' ~w pl 10 0 ],~0 L~ 6y~ ~~I~~~ I I I I •--J-j.._ . PI 19 S b. 0 A O~ OA i u T 9' S' ~1 0' g. .i~•:.••v, \ ~ Uy 0~ OA 5 6' p ~p• 0 D %~'i •7 PI ~ a BAL % r ~ o x- a 5• a• o • ' • 9/ ~g' \ \ o •5. ~1 0 ~ {[p/ ...1 - v • ~ ° q. - ` 16 p, \ " f0• DY ° I I ~ I I - q.61 ° OA p, F• ; •`0 , .b' V PI 0 8'V OA Mq• \ ~ `24c\ (OA1 ~ OA ® OA Ig I I ~ I I I I II OA OA DA VOLLEYBALL AREA ' Q10. CO ~"T : p o % 0 PI =iT4 &/N \ 6. ~ ~ 5• Oh ® g. B' LOA OA I G~~ \ 0 % '',~S 8' p A w, p y~?`8r. a;Y,~~",., OA A7. 5' ID' ~ ~-7 1 ~ ~q•y 4~ ~4 q~ .~0 6" . ~'l 1 OA b' 0 IVY OF 6^ ~ ~ 0 A~ 6. 0 q_6,~ Od q. ~ q. 176+1\ \ `~4 O~A 6'~' \ ~ OE 6. I i ~ 1 II . q l7 'CY ~ OA ~ " I I ~ q. ~ , 0 ` 0 0 q, 1;~ q` 0 Tq Y 1V ~ q.T.~Dp~__ 4 A b^ ..6~~\\` 1®OA \ PIR~E° t1'~~ Od pM \ ' ~~4\\ ~ B 0 EES 6REMAI~N w DE ' l15 I ~ I' ~i II ~T A p OA 0 OA Op• ~ ~ ~ , ~n 7 9'.~ q' OA ' i 5, 0~ ~ A OA s OA 0 • ~ I, 0 • 4' % 8 s• ~i ~ ~ A ~sa PROPOSED. 6 H CHAIN LINK FENCE. !B. c ..:,,,,,,g•,; a ~ ~ a ~ D p s ~ D s ° 9• s \ s" \ °Os" i OA IN BUILDING SETBACK o ~ f40SE D ' s• vl \ ~ r e D . 5• % - ®5. p • O PROPOSED 3 STnRY ' ~ OA OA ~ l~~ `Yi,~~.,} ~.?~^1 ~ 1 \ ~ III fY . , ~ -6~,~'{~~(~'~~~6 6' ~ \ T~'I `AT~aS \ ~ \ l Ib I I ~25 BUILDING SETBACK O / GA7E8 0 16' 0 9 5 i ~4 p• 4 0 ~ \ DE q - 0 pA r ~ s' 4 ®e• \ 0 26 UNIT BUILDING . ` OA ~ ~ q.. OA 1 gQC`C~~~.n1e 7.Q "Q °A °~p.q• \ 6. 6. ~ 61T A~~~~1GI~T \ ~ V ~ 4 q•~\ ~ OA 11 IO 0 B-. I ~ I i ~11-n•~ II 0~~-" \ A~ 4' O.7LY..3.~ S 1..:. gOA 11 1 `OA \ 0 9' 11 ~6'6' 1 I I I W'I II TENNIS COURT s 0 1 0 $p~ " \ 5 4 r zo '~~F ° g. , (6 CAR G~wpIGE ~7-IY q ' ° ~ ® If' \ VO \ T ~ DOV OA q" I I I p I (1~I ° . ~ e` 6- a, ~ 1 ~ I \ro, `'T ~ ~IIV~T`D S IO DE ' 6` ` S• V T ` ° 5 1 T DA ° I I I ~ I I. VACANT O P110' E 4". T q• 175- PI 6 q• ~ 0 DE `-x`9"2.4 . ~g• I 6 Q' I. OO ~ ~ 0 a OA •5. O 7-B. 0 J-6-p• ~ ~,q,1~3- \ U ~t.a Ij I q. Q „ T q ~ q . \ \ P A b \ o ° 6• 1 ~ \I ~ BLOCK i i f/ I~II p 5' ® ~ Od \ q-q:3' y~',P~',dQ(1~Jq` T"6\ \ 9.6' I 1 ~ WALL II I I I I `r'1yI 4~~~_ ~ Q 5~ ~ ~5, W 4 pl 11 - V \ 0 5- ~P~I~pv~~~[~•~ CJ r A. r.". ' PO D ~.S~RlpS, OA 4, 6 1Y ®q}Yp 0 ti^p.. " `~;lu 6T ~A 1 P PI PI 70 r % ~`s`}`.~ 0 e' 0 i~. 0 `~~•97-p• 1 ®s. ,,s1 co D 47~pA . ~ 6 U T B 6 ING p 5' , ®b` D 6' 0 • 6 ~ O~~q. ~ q` p ~ 6' OA 0 ` q' \ ° d; 6 p 0 1 fiY ~ 1 . OA q.q,q, pE ~ 'i o \ ° a• ` \ D D I ~ b/ III 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER PI 0 06'.". ~ 5 0 5 .,~r DE .1 0 1 4. Oq. 5 ~ - - 4 9' % ~ 6 . GA AGE ~ ~ ~ ~AtY 0 ~ da. DE ~ - ~ ~ ~ 0 6• g^ ~ . 11 ° °A q• q. 0 S•.. `~A De °L ° T. A \ F I s` I i I I Q 6- , ~p 2 ~ 3 7 ~ 5 G 9' 06' : ~ p ~ OA . g. ~ q. 0 KEEP GN B' ~ -POOL QU ILDING % o ® oA . o Y 04 1 . 9 0 ba UA 2 % r Oq• ~ ~ o3.q• ~ \ . p 1 9• ..q~' 1.. Ol A pp \ ~ .b, D ~ ~ A A6` 4 5 0 6` 0 \D 6• I 61 00 q / ~ Ifl _)I I®~. ~ ~ 4. OA 6•T .OA \6 ' I ~ 1. / I 10 LANDSCAPE BUFFER Dc PI P fi PUMP EN ' SU s 5, t t o f 10 ~ a" ..~1.1~ A I~: ~:~o ~ .6`°~°~.`, o - 1 I 1/~ ~,aq(h) . 1 ft i I~ ~ . g' PI I ®7, r ~Y 7 OA , g• DE 0 0 E0 ~.u i cr11; € ~s. • £ 0 7 9. 6 g• I9 ~~T 5 ~ 9 q," % 5 OA A ~n, ~ ~6 - "'s`"r DE \ 8` `76 ~CdAJ10,A~6. \ q V 1. f , 16(Iq IYI _ 6 6 ~ , ` F • DA ~ry s H ` t' \ ° 6 \ q.a• \ ~ 1 ° t /'`s'w-¢I' / III EDGEI'~F, PA4EMENT q 0 r~: > E 4;~ 6•T ~ - •.1 E.. 6, 0 \1 ~ 1` \1 V t F J~ 1~ 46 ~ I B' 0 9' OA % " ~ % PI OA . 0 A 1 •..,d ~ ;V ,'v,/+7. 51 bll ~I ~ + 1 ` 018. A 6'\\b• a \ ~ OA. V I',^ p01 11 1 \ /1~1 t ~ / oll - I 8' D OA Po b • ~ ~6` ~ - ~q'q~ V~~ 0~~ Il ~ OA_ `C l I ~ \6• ~ OA ~ \ W q•11 O~/W^ q'fi 1 1 0 `CIT ~ ~V t~ \ ~p~~ : o SCR WALL GOLF C ~ PARKING a s• oa o ~ ~ 4-4-4• $ q .~0 .:0 . 6.: u~ q C .1 AL~AA. ^~V 1 ~ ~6• ` , ~ II I h 4..,.`.. • S OA ~ OA /\'it~,ul . OA 12' 0 P •J. Or ~ e• •Qi•/ 46, ~ 0 DE OA ° ~ OA 0 DE \ 6` 6Y \ y~9Q , \ ~J , \ \ I `~I) W 0 b ~1~,~3` ~~\{q~ Vl ~~~~1IIIy.., 1 RE` q V I ~ /!J~ III PROPOSED RECYCLING AREA I yR I ''t ' 9' • s o ~ / R ~ oA 0 ~r .P OA 6• 9" ":r:•.;' ~.:•.I 0 ~q 5" ~ 'i ~ g~`/[y~ / 0 ~ ~ T•' O9 ' J: U ~ P "'V 0 6' g» :s` 4 . - A Da ~ ° o ;i:~ 0 5. ~q- o i oA ~ s" ~a• o STOP $I o ~s _ - O o •6.~.;+;:" s ;i'~:{''' ~T '4 a.4.4-s• of STOR$ n 9 M OA DA 9 b` OA q~' - 6'. °E p.. I °:E -S1: ` Ii q. ~ ; \,\(~p•^ °E • I b II ~ I ~TDP ~ 4 8.. 0 6 O OA q ~ ~ I OA 1, • V ~ H w~~ ~ 0 6' A OA SM ~C+Jh , b~ba~~V'~~\ I b\ dI I 6 iTOPq'B •0 •P 4~1 6• P10 Pt 0 ~54 ~`~t~.~;a~' q"(p~pGQ11 e~ 0 DE 6. 6' Aq-'~^^U~6'• p (I V+~) g• Is• ~ i~t' '',~`,A A •6• <; :s•, PROPOSED RETAI I G H• L T ~k 3 s•a IY PI ••Z:, ~ Of "•pC: a6" +•••,rj i~t 0 ALL BULKH DE ~ ^ 9' p d 1 40 ~ N q; I q OA \ YT 6 q ~ xkbA' ~ \ OA U :,D .PR6 \ 1 I 11 . f ( ~ 3 . I 0 ; PI ~ I OA •J X:~''~: PI ~i° PI p. ® I 0 ~ 0 4' 4• tl:1 P t 0 ~ r"_w~y.~iA ~ DE 6' ^~q. !,1\ 1V .Q ; ~ q•® •Oq• ~ Odq tG'143' 8' '/~y~~~J~l~~~\ 0~ • g/~R ~ 1I I (~~I. c ,,~A `~I"J ~l''`P4nnCKy, .`~f 6. 0 0~~ ~'"CJiµ• ~ 6 \ 0"~' ~ •'".~iJ ~ 8`. W~~~~Q 6 DE r i~(~s III ' I "9~> ~ I PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR o o .~u 0,1• Q CA o 1 oA ~0O I U OA q• ~ .o.yri,+ ~(,i 'i•' T OA OE PC OA ~ F 0 I SCREENED PER .CITY CODE • t ~ g~• ~ s' V Q• ° " ;A, s~: lo' ~w" DE ~~s" JQ('~~ ~y D ~ o I PI C! 5 .ir~~' ,~~p' PI ~ PI Otg• .V~ I r\ qD I~10• J{„~' 0 PI . PI OA P. 5' , E" ~ s 4.4' E y„r ; ~ yr P L~~I~G 3 ~ , rr j : P~ A 8" 12" /~~yC,]~ OA rnU J .r.*`,,.,. l1/ L~ I ~ p ~{.6^ \ 0 ° 6•: ~g. \ ~w a+e^~ 0 `v"J~ E \ ~L\ I I I r- pl ='!q: g• p PI 4' I OE 0 ~ 1' :,H.., T /r~ ,I 0' Q- ~ PI •j•! p ~ 0 p 0 ~4' ~ 1 0 q• I~/~y . I Z ~1 ~®p..4 O T 6... 11 S„$g \ ~ ~ OA ~r, 4''\`,` 6' q M Il ~ I ~ j 1 I ~ ~y L Q I W I ~~„i ° ~ 0 t \ \ 0 b, ® 6. DE p` 10~ I I II ' • ' t G~ PI ~ PI p 1~ v ,G~7 6+ 0 q• 8 A 1 M 10 LANDSCAPE I 06 s'. D T a• ~ DECORATIVE .FOUNTAIN 1N E` o s' M- I ~ Ng 17 6• \ E 0 \V ~4r 'i4 S ° q• 0 A 4, ~ 0~4, 1 6. ~T',/, 991 f I I ' II~ r~ I r~ BUFFER GATE ° s PIA OA ~ ^ s• o ~ ~ 1 ~ 1:1 0' ~.r•P: , ~ 's : y . 4 5' 2 O ~ 4.9 MM~i ~q • A \ ° q• q• l 1 '6 { 1 I {il f 1 W ~ 6 f6~. M \Mq` OA OA 6• ~ ~ OA ~ b, ®q DE 8• 0 OA ~~q. ° D ~ I 1 I t I) Q ~ O r • ? 0 '.7• .y.3, .r~.• 5•'•a:•' p, ~ PI 0 ~N 0 ~ ~ 8• ~fi~ I DN-SITE ICK • . g ® ~ p- DE Iq" ~ p E y ~ 1 ~ UN 0 ~L ''r. •J , 4. d' P PROPOSED DE D T p ~ . 0 3~.' .9` ~ 8' ~ y°t. 'A OA I f0 5 ~ OA6; , ®6'~. P ~ II II ~dI ( I y^~ w/ J {t'?N IY ' : T - A B OA 0 OQ} a a\\ q-& 9 OA ~ 0~ • II 1 II l I I II N I fW'~A \ O Q' PAVER ROADWAY ~ a g PI ~ T ' w• ~s.a' ; .~J'~~tJ .0 ~ ~ 6• OY ~ ~„\\Q A ~ 'IC ~ \0 OA q, ~ OE p~ ^`^^^q• I I ~ jI I I I I) ` D ~q- bt 1, 1 I e. a" SAN Q LIMITS AND D , 4 5 D D S~0 WATER MANAGEMENT. 5• OA PI q. ~ 0 O 9 q•. . Q OBED , Q AT A DA 4• D ° 5 SIFSTEM 100 4• 0 8.7.T p 5. w T 0 ~ 0 4.4.4' 9" ~ ~ oA& N" F 1, A ~ T6` D i I 1 I 1 Q ~ OA ` PI 5. O DE • ~ . 0 ~ 0~. . 0 . •KR - ~ 4-a OE , 0 5 5 0 4 ~ 0 I 4` `!6' I q ` } 4~~`. t .s 6• ~ ° k~~,~o ~ ` I 1 E I!I 1 I4 0 ~ pp ~ "OF 0 \ ~ `W \ ~ 0 ] 1 1 1 1 1 II ~ ~ I i~3:3•q ~~6• T ~ ~q• OA 15 BUILDING P oA p r ~ ! s's'^' 4 A 4 0A 5• p l5'C7'S• ~ ~ ! ~ 4 I SETBACK / PI o Dl~'' ~ oa oA 52 R r ` t 4' PI o _ 04.4.4~i' r s'^•^•s / PI n.. ua' Os' 04 I Od5 'S q +X~~ p •/~0 ~ q• ~\x~.. ~y ~p6" Vp .N ^^~A'~qy,^y1~ : Il i t `I l~ I O 9' ~ / ~5 4 3ta"i' q• 0 ~ ~`ti„ y~ p 9 OA . OA ! ~ Q` ~ •CURITY GA ~ oA . °~A vl PI P ~s• ~'s.4•a• s ~s.4 ~ • v pA i• 176b-6••oA 6' 4• 'Ia.E 0.7 •~B l"7 ~ ~ DY ~4® Y4~1 ;I' LYI\B Tlr. Opy '`~'B~OA 6' x 0 ;E $t ' 0 .I) I . ' I, O - 0 ~ 1nT~ . ~ ' •1 PI A o9' IO' OA ~ PI " \t~ ~ iar,F f .kt A' w 4 0 T P 0 ~ p 6 ` 0 6 f"9•.. OA ~4-q•6.6' ,~q. ~ 0 8• "8` ~ P 0 6' 9 p p• 1 a 1 ` , V TRAFFIC CONTROL ~OX ' 9' 2 ~,+~„,.a }yg" dµ° OAy~ 0 5 PI Ua ~ Ptg ~+v 5 OE OA 8'~ ~ ~e - ~ PI b. 45' ~ PI O / 4 ~s;g• !OA ~ ~A . s• " c • s• PROPOSED OUTFACE 0 „ Q ~ o Q5. a a(~ AA 4-r ~ STRUCTURE O, J I ~ 0 3W7J' 69' ~1 ~4'r vx.. 5• ~ 'h' %p' V r ~~J.4%a 4.5' .N'• ~0~ L~ T 0 ~ T ° / ID b 43 C' .v.. - _ ^ g _ f ~ , -GONG, TRAFFIC UG T PROP. OUTFALL 1 A O 9 P' ~ O ~ ~ s" pEAp l p 6 s" 4' b' ~ 0'Q~3~ ~ _ _ . ~ - POST I _ r STRUCTURE ~ ~ o ~~k s' G S sa ~ r~• s• o s. . 0 ~ 0 W 0 OA . ` i.~l.~~~jj~~~'v OA .0 ~Dp^ 5' ®5, / O 4• m, O ; ~t ~ N B'~ PI ;.Y`~h'~ 9' q b" T 6-T .`0,'"'^~ DE _ p' ~ ~'"xe. 0 . X 25' BUILDING SETBACK ~E , B" WM - ' » ---''l?`~~~~ °0 .PAVING AND FRONT YARD - - ~ S44 5611 E PROPOSED WALL \ Ip OA -7 V 4 b % 0 6.0' ,z h pl q• p l EASEMENT \ I g, ~ o~ • p q. ,tff1L, 0l9 p ~ ~ 35.36 I PROPOSED 10' SIDEWALK ' ~ ~ 9 0 9 o .8 g- % ~ o ~ i & UTILITY EASEMENT \ ~ q' E / ~ °Q ~ ~ '1 y -7 "fin ~ P •i 5' % ~ A / , kS,P .5 7 8' - OA 7~ ~4.4' 5 010' c, / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C° 1 EX. a° SAN S x PROPOSED DECORATIVE A dLNU E 25 BUILDING SETBACK o o o ~ p s• o ~ ~ s ~ AND FRONT YARD D `o ~ C~ o os / / x PEDESTRIAN GATE PRO~CT SIGN ~ ~ 9 pG. X _ _ _ SIDEWALI( CONNECTION 8 ~ ~ oa I! 4.4.4.4.5• J 0 Id A' ~ p'ly.. ~ 4' S' 1N 0 ~ / '~1t 0 0 ~ C PI / / PROPOSED B \ I ® RICI( wAU. ~ 44• ` © Oq. 6 ROP gU PI / / 0u EF{TRgNCE FEATURE • p ~ q ' i~~/ p8• ~ ' .;,a. ' / _ ~._=E SIDEWALK . 10-6 MAX, HEIGHT \ s ~ o~ o 4' Z on r / OS EP \ s 3 8 r T Ip o a' ~ l/ ~ • B 5 ~T / , ~ . ~ G~ Y UE DE \ / Q M p' ~ 0 b' PI o 0 / ~ OF ~ ~ ` -~1 EX. SAN MH ~ 1 ~II ' , i RIM = 43.90 EX. WETLAND TO BE FlLLED 0,10 AC. EX. CONTROL y P.B. P 1 •y'"~:.. - ~4sss• D ? / / / i i~ i' t ' I,E = 32.46 (E) PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED STRUCTURE I LII ~ ~ ~ BUS SHELTER l 11 4 0 OA 4• p r~ / / % ~ i i~ i~ ` I I,E. = 30,67 (III i / ~ 1 I . LE. _ 30,61 ((N~ ~ /i ~ I I EXISTING II "F" CURB TYP. 1 Ir . r ~®l4 I 6 s• ,D i / ~E~ / / / GP ~ /i V 0 BY D . Op OA QP / \ / • ~ 1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT II 2 2 04 a ~ of / ~ / / / EX. WETL S p RA D s• s-r GE / / % e y ~ G / /i o / / ~ / / PREVIOU. EX. WETLAND TO'BE FlLLED 0.11 AC. ' a ' SYSTEM PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED i- ~ II I T 16' s '?L I it ~ / / E4S,~ o 0 oa „r , : / 1 ~ / / ~ / / PEDESTRIAN GATE 1ESIRIAN GATE i~ i I • 5, ~ 4" oAq _ , / ~ V~P~~ SIDEWALK CONNEC711 EWALK CONNEC110N Iw .:I • \ \ v~r / / / / / / ~ //y~~/ I I DA 5• 34• `DES ~~r. % f /~V. `G. / `Pp II I 1 . _ .I. 1 I L. ~ PROPOSED LIGHT FlXTURE TYP. G w 4• o / 8 ~ ~ / / .~p~ r. -------I, I. I r---------°-- 1 I - z • - - ~ \ / / / „RCP • ..~s I / / F 0 5' ~ ~ IrX 1tf ~ y f% ; ^ TREE ~.EGEND J , ~ ~ 4 / / - 1 EXISTING. OSPREY NEST ~ y pE~ ~ / ~ t - SYMBOL DESCRIPTION. ~ TO BE RELOCATED ~ •1 QP'~ \ ~ f/ E PAV TUR SPEED. HUMP y CT - FU ~-.FUTURE PAVNG _ PROPOSED-DECORATIVE FT~ICE ~C1~` ti r,_.._.. i ' '`I -,I ~ ® BAY 1 I I i I ~ r '~i~ t C~ CHINA BERRY CONSISTING OF 2x2 MASONRY COLUMNS i I r 1 _ I I / r __i 1-----____-__ / L---______ ^^Jl i RFA i ® CITRUS 40'-0" VN1H ALUMINUM PICKETS BETWEEN COLUMNS. Z i~,-T' ` k. ~ O.C. N t~? ` 9y ~_i of DEAD o SEE SITEPLAN FOR SPACING ti \ 1 1 J 0 ~ + t_ \ N~ ® MYRTLE W 1 ' ~ .m..~. \ °O OAK `,v/ \ © BALM I ,i O P' PINE d °w MAX. MAX. E`ti• t'1+ ~ ~Y ~ W N /1 I ~ ~ • ` ® UNKNOWN ' ~ / \ / ~ Y ~ m ~ / r0 ~ r \\Vll F U~ ~ 9 1 4~ $ ~ / ti \ 1 - ~ \ 1 m a ~ a / \ , 1 , \ I m ~ W ~ , ~ \ _ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 \ I . _ 1 1 c a~ ~ W W•. Y W ~ I ~ \ ' wu~cArrEn sal 1 r~~~,le ~ ~ Y ~ ~ i c z~ ~ O U / U m t0 ~ / / ( I~ ~ ~ ~ r_ ~ ~ err _ - / / V I m Z ~ / ~ ~ m a ~ ~ a ~ ` ~ I 4---, ~E~I~.,~ a z ~ ._s 3 Q ~ J NOE 6lUE °p ~ ~ ~ I / _ _ I e1RVE II I\ I. ORIGINAL o ? 2"X 2" ALUM., POST EMBEDDED 60" (MIN.) HIGH ALUMINUM GATE RECEIVED I p N F INTO 8" W X 12" D CONCRETE W! PICKETS @ 4" O.C. I POURED FOOTING @ 6'-0" O.C. I ~ I , ,ww,1~.wIE~I I ~ N MAX. N I I b ~ ~~P 071006 a a L_ L J. I FUTURE i y ~0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT N Z I ~ > W I ~ ; ~ y CITY OF CLEARWATER ~ ~ I BUILDING Id tioTE: EXISTING y W aces ~/a"-r-o~ I LOT 1 I I All pavement makl~6 to tro thermgpla6tlc. Z ~ I BUILDING S1 ~ Y SYORZ -OPHTHALMICS,` INC.. r`""~'~ a m I ' PART( PLACE to ® ~ CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA m } C1 610.OD 36.5t 18.26 36.50 S0146 42 W 03'2546 N~4NpIC,~PP~~ 5~~~~ n~1'~41~ io • o C2 890.00 388.40 199.49 383.29 S12 37 56 E 32'15 06 - ~ ° C3 285.00 292.94 160.89 280.21. S00 41.14 W 58'53 31 c 0 B o DE81GttED THE 81GNATUAE OF THE WAt1TY . weee~a.. ° caxsa arricER IH THHIS SPaCE RWA ros NO. c C NINCATES TROL THAT ALL IS SPACE XIAAG EAAGIAIEERING ASSOCIA;rES INC. o DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED 9 5 9-05-06 ADDED HANDICAP ACCESS PER CITY COMMENTS: 1180-001-000 JLW CAD' AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS En (nears Planners urVe rS ` ' FOR, RI[ PLACE. 4 2-**-97 REVISED WATER MAIN & MOVED COMPACTOR FOLD DDDK NO. FINAL...SITE PLAN.. g S yo Scientists Landscape Architects N CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES ;s 3 0-16-96 MOVED BRICK COLUMN OUT OF EX. U nUW ESMT 3 d 24945 U.S. 19 N.. 5010 West Kennedy Blvd. 8406 Massachusetts Ave. RWA learwater, FL. 34623 Suite 200 Suite A-2 LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOT 3 2 9-20-96 REV. PER. DRC COMMENTS ADDED PARKING LOT ORATION DATE, g o.C' (813) 791-1441 Tampa, FL. 33609 ew Port Richey, FL. 34653 t 4-30-96 REV. PER. CITY DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW 4-10-96 SCA« 3 Z JJG (813) 282-0111 (813) 846-0904 Z No. DATE REVI9KINS APP' 1 n=50' g ~~..,.t.a LJ`~ry,~~#~ aj ~jiR{'~<~r2krldt~o'~~?~''"It;h Rt~{r(,r~i,•;r:.ar.r<< ~~,.,ei~ ' !p7,~ ,~'~r,r .4 s; ts;F rt,4c .r';s' . t~,~;~g:s a r~sfi#,,, ~ '~gY 7•~„ .t~t'^ ~ b" st k ' J. r!1 x . „n+r : G' v,•4? ~'?~~::~5dr, tk - . S y;''~ 4S"t,~:i.'a(v'~. ~gr'{¢4jl t j7: ~ y 3~fr ~ , ! .y'~: y Jt~ , ~:~t:X„~ne;Y~ f,' .,,,'dS:n; ~ ' (dt~~;~,:,. .~ztt^t .z.ay' ,rq, 4, j? 'rv~r.. rp1; t q.~ i1~' t ti E- ;y,~,`C~ •9~fr~~, dki' f :.K . ,drtlh~f • r7e_ ~•.~u y: ; ~'~f , o..Fl, , r rr ait~ r'~...a . i • ~i~?., . N'~ , ::~i tr 4 ,.J, ~ ~11~ w r i~'~~ a ..rfrt ~ ~rBWr tr;fir` , ~"r` s .xc. ar• A F RVEY FOR: ~ . r~~!c. .Ny.!f?iSq'x, n s d' rr~~.$~, ~,.s;:A S!Y.p4~~(4kY p`11'ikjr ~ s~: ~ J''r a. ~qLm ~,'rEs~" ,w.''°t ~ ;~rp 'fro ~,oa.. djM:.r SC ~ , r.J , ...J.. : ~.1. eG i f i 7 .`J 'i rc . n DEVELOPMENT, LLC Y ~ t{ t ~ )~-~3(~ ~ r s o..~t ~ ~~tr~ ~ ~ N i~ r, s ~ ,k . , u . ; ter„ ~I~r ~ , ~ ,5~~'~ . . ~i; ~~}N~.~ , , N44 56 91 W ?ry ~'J i7n~}^,r, Jf ~tyfi li u' ~ 'rat'`, :rt. .4 ~yma t'. xC'tEt1j~~~ !7b ~~r . 1 , , r~.1 t ,t= ~•b,,,,<;Y : : ~r• ~ ~ , ~ r>~~~~[~~;: S89 5611E 357.62 35.36 ~,{s..: r~'fSk't~dL~)i ft t ,:k t:. ~~~'~r ~irf~`wt,•:~i 'k ' a j~7`J ,ri5.~Z6`i~`~ z ~ ; This survey is made s ecifrcaU and onI for the follows rues for the purpose of a .7~t~ j 1~~.~~•,~ , ~;e3~1p.~ t y '..p ctl:1,;;~.r~t,:•r., x,, ~~s~,~t' I IL~J y P Y Y ng parties for the purp E ~y~~,~, f•xr r~J: , .;Y/.~ 9('~f .~'P~ c - O ~ > 1, 5 a~>t 1 Z ~7>a! t l;,~z~r~ ,t•.~ b~li` 1~ ,,,~~:.~n~1~ r ~ ~ trtr , 1~ r~ql r closing on the surveyed properly. x ' t. t i~, f7t~ t ill' ti~4. , i. ff '`9~ Qi r I t ;~jr;~ 41e,~33E~.{,.,~~ v k~ .C r~!f ~i ~%2u jyl. r ,?~:1~t~t1t;':~~i' ~ L.l:~p{~~~~','.~~;t~(s, `s " t. ~t~ s l ty~a"~.~r Y~~ i' b, t~°~ »~att~ zot• r# ;sv,:k. J;w ~ ; ~fi' • .fa}:vgr". a i ~'sti" " ''•i~~ b~f '~?t4• ?y~II,,(( ~•.~~s:Le:.afii r n , 7. .ors :,r'' ~~'~~;.Yttrt:~ d"r~1"~ 1 J ~t1r.~r~'z1 ~r,~ii' ,~4a.r.ty,1 vf':4;'•,o1s~j'~i~~;1?EI~ .."i; r' att.t a ny,~~;s N„fit ~r~ I~~Ir~~ t(rfi ~,;~'~~t z ~ s ~ r~',r,;~~~i,;~t':~;;~,r~ > N Parklsle Condominium Development, LLC ~sJr ~ t ~ a~ai :1 ~ 4•• o CeS t `z k! 1x , z. 1 r .c r~~ },473' r ri tlr~ ; u L r .,i r n s a '7 , ~o Yy ~}.1~ ,f h~. f ~st~ ~ , jy~~r ~M: ~ r-;~ a~, ~;I~~~f~.~ ~ ,;,x,~~ rz , : : o Chicago Title Insurance Company hF 9. ,AI1*' ..rpw a.r,,&,'tt5., , :l H¢~~>7pnG~~ ,c'~„i::z; r{Y'~r,~e:~~{,~':G: ab~ ~ : ~`"t: vgt'~.[E,~, a iE,^...t + ,r :~y:;~" G ~ f.3'~~~t1~H`Y,f 1>~.bs L t Vii; l VJ l V .W,W F 7 S":4~~i Sb' . ~5 N P 'a . ,g ~ General Electric Ca 1ta1 Cor oraffon !ts successors ~,~E ,~S,~y;~,~,,4x , Y s , t t; , u f.T ';~,a . ~ ~ P p and asst ns as the assigns, as their interest may M . , , ,7 r ~ ~~>x~r ~ ~J~ r appear 1r', .f ~w~~;1 ~aS `°i t ~ e ~ ^~7`J•:'4~~ ~~3 ~ e,, ~t.t`, i'LC s e y e~~ ~ dy'a"."•u~ ~,a' a;~ • qr,~~r, < r ~ ~7,:f I<` I;, ;t n<•q~~, ~ :f~ ~rr•: ~2.><. , €,M:., a, w Grand Reserve ~ VEF VI . , „r'r ..'f._~j•a°~'Y~,~"~i3,,! ~.y.,t';I',.1, a, • :...I;OS~,~c,.:',. r' ` „;,f.7Y', , . r ~r~r. ,LLC k'ira;sj?5'h~r`;~~~x,~sv ~ fill, a t~urr ,:~~~~3,~, ,~~~hgya::zY;J+E2k; a~~r~~ `~,t ~Jr~P L?b,Yi~~ t: ,t,,~y;;ti~,~',, ,.ie•?~1~~;.64r,a~.£}Y'{>~v~i,~ct.att.•~+:c i3~'',~?f,~~:x~'}•s.,;....p}'W ` r°ft~~rr'.x~1 S:~~tn.: - ~ ~ t~~.:#1 Or~•~ ~4~ z o-ta .r ' L , r,,, r.^`,x s rs ca, T t~oh k z~i~` rk~1 zy~ "E' ur, •Eb• a ~ £hfi ~s '.~»~s ~ r ~ M ~1~~r , Ea~; t{rr.r`acna .,,..v': ~ ~~`''yP'' , ,d rtv* r-• ,;,`;.,5 , ~:w ...2,.,rh .yqc <~,(~rt•'„"h „3~s~:;~~ , •.St :x,7,.., :R&,:n3•,•.. ~ti:>;~, L.aejsl~;, s.. , sy , a ,,y ..,.y; •;)r, 3 ,,,,yri, .,.7J A . ,S.l M & j No res onsibili or Iiabili is assumed b the u :r1rr .,,.-:..~.~.>:ya ;~~.SS,,sw ~ ,.x.I ~.b. , ~ P h' h' y ndersfgned surveyor for any c ;,3'". ti ~f! 3 k d EA 7'U r~5 ffi~ii• .i: arveyor for any other purpose 0' 100' 200 : 300' ;?ta:t.'z~b:Ji,J~ ,.7s~.~%3',' , ,r nv'rF~L;,..,~;+~.. ~~.:~i'k .~••'•fx~,~a:v ~ ~ or to any other party other than stated above, ;~2s27 0 ' VICINITY SKETCH N T.S. o „ Z ~=0325 46 PROPERTYADDRESS: A-36.51 ' . .,7,. 100 Park Place Boulevard South i ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION FEE PARCELS: . SCALE.• 1 =100 . ' .6 . R 10.00. Clea?wafer, FL 33759 PARCEL 1: (SURVEYED) 0 0 Lots 2 and 3; of STORZ.OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book TITLE COMMITMENT REVIEW o • 909; .page 90, of the public records of Pinellas County,. Florida. The following easement parcels are shown and 'CifENT: GrandReserveatParkPiaee COMMITMENTN0.:200504491 DATE: November 28, 2005 O A " o II noted but are not surveyed! REVIEWED BY: Craig L. Wallace JOB NO.: 05.1276 ~ I 0 W Z p ~ 3~ ~ ~ w W ~ ~ LEGAL DESCRlPTlON9 FOR EASEMENT PARCELS: . B21TEM N0, DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION. AFFECTS PLOTTED O ,rn 2821 ;E, 1to4 StandardBxce lions Yes No ~ N P m ~ ° 70 " PARCEL l1: (SHOWN,: NOT SURVEYED) 5A O.R•8.5978 Page 2110 EasementAnd Restrictive Covenant " Agreement ForPamelsAdjacenf Yes No Z Parcels Lying Sauih Of Survey Parcels, Affects V ~ • . Non-exclusive easement for the benefit of Parcel 9 as recited /n that certain Stormwater Management Agreement ,The Pond And Sign Easement 4 ~ I {Blanket Easemeng ~ ~ ~ recorded January 27, 9997, in Oftlcfal Records Book9599, page 29, of the public records of 171nellas County, lip a~ ~ ~ Florida, over and across the land described as follows: • O 58 O.RB. 6256 Page 1111 Adds Surveyed Parcels (Lots &and 3) to O.R.B. 5978 Page 2110 (Ctirrecfive lnstmment) Yes No Q (BlanketfasemenQ O /1 A tract of land being a portion of Lof 9, according to the plat of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC.,. PARK PLACE, as " \1 . SC O.R.B• 7830 Page 2386 Confirmation OfEasements - Yes No•; ' recorded in Plat Book 909; pages 90 through 19, of the public records on Pinellas County, Florida,. and lying within 5D O.R.B, 7830 Page 2390. Confirmation Of Easements Yes , • N6`' ~ ~ ,v. ~ 8 ~ ~E A . 5E O.RB.8539 Page 1411 Confirmation Of Easements Yes No , ».~•s.... _ ?ar„ ~ #261 W CN LI • . the Northwest 7/4 of Section 97; Township 29 South, Range 96 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more 5F O.R•B.9635Page5li Waiver Of Rights Yes , No: "t • 3 , T MATCH LINE A M~ N - particularly described as follows: - 5G •O.R.B.9635Page513 WahrerOftZghts Yas No 'S?,, , 5H .O.R.B. 9635 Page 514 Waiver Of Rights Yes No + vt BEGIN at the Southeast comer of said Lot thence along the South boundary lines of said Lot 9, the following Incorredty Ref. As O.R,B. 9535 Page 514 ~ Y~^ ' " C.t',,r. O ~ ~ nine (9) courses:- (9) thence South 89°40`39" West, for 195:98 feet; (2) thence North 59°39'49"West, for 6780. 6A O.R.B; 5675 Page 935 Annexation Agreement Yes. " No'• ~ ~ 68 O.R,B, 5675 Page 885 Amended Annexation Agreement, Yes ,No O f\ ~s feet; (3) thence North 81 °3755" Wesf; for 52.19 feet; (4) thence South 72°25'38" West, for49.99 feet; (5) thence 6C O,R•B, 5679 Pa a 1461 Deveio ant Order es Z 8 Pm Y No • N 3 6D O,R,8.5680Page410 RestatedAnnexafionA reement Yes No' ~Q N North 75°34'35" West, for41.82 feet; (6) thence South 83°04`43".West, for 47.02 feet; (7) thence South 41°38'34" 6E O.R.6.7890 Pa a 834 Madificafian To Develogment Order Yes. No ^ ,~2s15 L LINE BEARING DISTANCE 8 p W West, for49.06 feet; (8) thence South 02°04'59" West, for4.23 feet; (9) thence South 89°40'39" West, for 965.65 6F O.R.B. 8931Page2349 ModfficadonToDevelopmentOrder Yes No U3 L1 N02'D4'S9"E 4,24' 6G O.R.B. 5619 Page 545 Notice Of Development Order Yes No R~ • ~ , feet. fo the point of intersection. with a -non-tangent curve concave to the West, said point also being the polnf of 6H O.R•B: 9545 Pa a 1843 Notice Of Deveio meat Order Modificafion Yes No ~ 00 N L2 $40 38 34 W 41, 06 9 p O N O , Z ~ (n v'~`' ~ Infersectlon with the Easterly right-of-way Hn~ of Park Place Boulevard, as recorded in aforesaid plat; thence 61 O.R.8:11319Paga406 Notice Of Development Order Modification Yes No ,N ~p L3 583 04 43 ~W 47.02 6J O.R.B. 13513Page2029 NoliceOfDevelopmentOrderMod~catlon Yes No,,.. ~ N ~ ' ' " r Northwesterly along said right-of-way line and the arc of said curve with a radial bearing of North.75°? 1'54" Wesf, and having a radius of 365.00 feet, `a central angle of29°39'54 ; an arc length of 988.98 feet and chord bearing L4 N75 34 35 W 41.82 7A O.R.B. 6366 Page 1058 Blanket Easement For WaterAnd Gas Mains ~ N ~ , , „ , North 00°09'51" West, for 986,88. feet to the point oflnfersectlon with anon-tangentline;: thence North 75°08'92" o° ~ L5 N72 25 38 E 41.99 As Installed OrWill Be Installed Within 5' O( The Installed U0lities And A Blanket IngressAnd 2 ~6ti ~ L6 N8137 55 W .52,11' C' l r~~ East, for 47.94 feetto the-point ofintersectlon with anon-tangent curve concave to the Northeast; thence Egress Easement For Garbage Colledlon And L7 , „ , _ Southeasterly along the arc of-said curve, with a radial bearing of North 45°53'10"East, and having a radius of Ciry of ClearwaterVehicles, Specific Locations N59 39 49 W .67.80 Are Not Defined By The Recorded InslrnmeM Yes No N~ 136.00 feet, a central angle of 46°92'39", and arc length of 909.68 feet, and a chord hearing .South 67°13'06" East, 78 O.R,B. 7109 Page 1055 Blanket Utility Easement OverAlll Of Site Yes No ~ Q for.906:T3 feetto the.polntoftangency; thence-North 89°40'39"East, for47.40feet; thence South 00°99'29"East, ' 8 Plat book 109 Page 10 Plat Easements; if Plottable, Are Showd Yes Yes ~ s o B V~`~' .R..9591 Page29 StormwaterManagementEasement Yes Yes ryth for 62.00 feet; thence. North: 89°40'39" East; for 218.48 feetto the. point of curvature of a curve concave to the, Northwest; thence. Northeasterly-along he arc of sa/d curve, having a radius of 189.00 feet, a' central angle of 10 O.R,8.9758 Page 255 Blanket Cable TV Easement ` Yes No ~ BAUSCH & LOMB SURGICAL . 11 O.R.B.10127 Page 191 .Blanket Distribution Easement Ta Florida Power • . 60°42'42';. an arc length of 999.79 feet and a chord Bearing North 59°99'98" East, for 182.94_feet to -the. point of Corporation. Document States ft Is A 1o Foot ^,r, P,C.N. 172918855460000010 Infersectlon with a ,non-tangent line; thence North 89°40'39" East; for 56.94 feet to the point of intersection with the Wide Easement Bul The Easement M Description Is For All Of Lots 2 And 3, ~ INesferly right-of: way line of Hampton Road, as recorded in aforesaid plat, said right of-way Ilne also being 43.00 STORZ OPHTHALMICS. Fudher Restrictions .M ~~t ; ;e • ~liQr Are Recited For Fence Placement Nezt To ~ N r " " feet Wesf of and parallel to the North-South centerline of said Section 97; thence South 00°99'21" East, along said ~5 ~ " ATCN LINE B > TransiarmerPads. Yes No ~ cA ~'-~-,w,•; 6 N ,.w~rrM s~xs:ara•z ~ ~-.,w:a' ~ : ~ right-of-way Ilne, for 987.48 feet fo the POINT OF BEGINNING. 12 O.R.8.10316 Page 1020 Water Uliliry Easement Yes Yes 2630 ~ ,za ~ ~ ~ ~ Il w 13 O,R.B.10113 Page 2611 Easement Far Entry 3ig0'And Stormwater Pond. . ....PARCEL. (SHOWN; NOT SURVEY€D) Note: Pond Area (Exhibit "B" in Document 81ank, Graphlc0escdption Was Used.) Yes Yeg • • 14A ????Page2336 DoctimentNotSupplied ? ? O • ~ ~ Non-Exclusive Limited Easements for the benefit of Parcel l as recited /n that certain Easement recorded July 29; 14B O.R.B. 10172 Page 2232 Maintenance Agreement For A Portion Of • ' Park Place Boulevard Adjacent Ta Parcel , Vr~• tt) _ 1998, in Official Records Book 90173, Page 2691, of the public records of Pinellas County, F~orida over and Surveyed. Note: Referenced Document MILES-ROYAL BREEZE ao - across the land described as follows: _ O.R.B, 9119 Page 409 Not Supplied Yes ,:Yes F ;2806 ,rY,, ,,a~-ar N 15A O,R.B,-10143 Page 1222 Maintenance Agreemen(ForAPottlonOf •C,rJ 17291600000220020 + ;~u II ,~y' a L3 5 L6 ' ENTRANCE SIGN. EASEMENT.• Park Place Boulevard Adjacent To Parcel ••y~, ~41 Susie ed. Note: Referenced Document v w;>>•>` ~ O,fi•B. 9119 Page 409 Not Supplied ' Yes Yes ~l• , „ ~ , ~ of N89 40 39 E N89 40 39 E 7 158 O.ft8,10172 Page 2232 Maintenance A,greernent For A Portion Of - MATCId LINE "B" G'~ , 'Park Place Boulevard Adjacent To Parcel "x+;irs,4"`' ~'nat,~r"` `^;r`~+:+•~'r',~V" 9'40'39 "E 195.18' A parcel of land lying within Section 97, Township 29 South, Range: 96 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Surveyed, Nole: Referenced Document ~ 165.66 O.R.B: 9119 Page 409 Not Supplied Yes Yes (1, 6 e 6 O.R•B.9906 Pa a 1848. Draioa a And Sidewalk Easement Yes Yes ~ ~'`"~°z°=,, 'rj ~ 0= 15' ~ 9'S " 17 O.R.B.90173 Page 2697 Lease -Not Survey Related Yes ~ ~ Q ~ _ BEGIN at the Southeast comer of Lof 3; STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, as recorded.in Plat Book . _ . o ~ A-97, 67 _ ~ o _ :fyt ' R=365.00' 909, pages 10 and 19, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence along the West right-of-way Ilne of o 4j9r _ a ~ Park Place Boulevard, as recorded In Offrcialrecords Book 9979, page-409, of the public'records of Pinellas Counfy,`Florida, South 30°08'0.0" East; for 69.00 feet; thence leaving said West right-of-way Iine, North 59°52'00" .N tiG West, for 90.00 feet; thence North 30°08'00" East for 32.00 feet; thence North 59°52'00" West, for 95.00 feet; Surveyor's Certlflcate to accompany Wallace Surveying Corporation File No, 05.9278 ~ o ~ NF , AREA IS INUNDATED . U ~ o p. fhence North 30°08`00° Easf, for20.00 feet,• thence North 59°52'00" West, for S.OOfeet; thence North 30°08'00" aOO i d e isfered curve or of the State of Florida certifies to Chia o Titlelnsurance o ~ Y<t" The enders gne being e r g y 9 O o 0 \ ~ East, for 97.00 feet to the South boundary line of sa/d Lat 3; thence along said South boundary line; South' Com an Grand Reserve - VEF VI LLC Park Isle Condominium Deveio mast, LLC, ,General Electric ~ , A „ p Y N S89 54 49 W ~ 7 59°52'00" East, -for 30.00 feetto fhe:PO1NT OF BEGINNING. : Corporation,tssuccessorsandassignsasfheirinterestsmayappear,andsuchotherlendersasmayextend ~ J ~~;,wriµ,•,rw :.tip-t: ~.§i4'. - _S.~S'a`.sYn"F~y.7;: ^,;,:cx. Bi;1G:".r7~a O~ U' VSYi: ;&tr,'.°.fF,3Y't~7J r.,•:AJnnnoa:v4".r:9~r,~~G:Yi~r(~i: S;eY~i, ;55~~'i credit to the record owneras follows: 50.00 r3~ oo MATCH LINE °D" _ ~ AND- ' MATCH LINE ' "C" O >r ,0 ~ POND EASEMENT N0.2: (SHOWN, NQT SURVEYED) • 1. 1 hereby aifest that the surveyshown hereon meets the minimum technical standards setforth by the Florida rb 0 ~,r ' Statutes 'and ado Led in S89 54'491N •0 Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers pursuant fo section 472.027,. Flonda p y ~W ~ 0 ~ ~ Js . cdo Cha ter 61G17: 6, Florida Administrative Code, effective Se tember 1 1981, and certify that this Survey is RS. 97.31 'yS . ~ ~ ~ Mr P P ~ o ~ ~ 9S . ~ ~ ~ A parcel of land lying within Section 17, Township 29 South, Range. l6 East, Pinellas County, Florida, and being - . • made at least in accordance with Minimum Standard Detail Requlremants forALTA/ACSM Land Tatle S. ~ ti ~ 20 ' ~ ;more particularly described as follows: j SS o, 7 Surveys, jofitly established and adopted by ALTA, ACSM and NSPS in 1999, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, , ~ , o d .O , ~y 0 ~ ~~o s Q. _ 6 7 a 7 b 3 8 9 10 11 and 13 of Table A thereof. Pursuant to fhe Accurac Standards'as ada tad ~ O N O +O s COMMENCE of the Southeast corner of Lot 3; STORZ ~OPHTHALMICS, .INC., PARK PLACE, as recorded /n Plat N Book 109; pages 90-19; of the ubllc records of Pinellas Coun Florida; thence aloe the Wester! n ht of-wa byALTA, NSPS and ACSM andln effect on the date of this certifrcaflon, undersigned furlhercertlfres that ?o y •O ~ Q p fY, 9 Y. 9 Y. . ~ l/ne of Park Place Boulevard, as recorded In Offrcial Records Book 9199; page 409, of the public records of the Positional Uncertalnfles resultin from the serve measurements made on fhe curve do not e~~ceed the ~0 ~ ,<7s~~fx'~x 9 y Y o ~ ~4 allowable Positional Tolerance. o. t.INE.E• °o ~ Pinellas County,. F/orlda, Soufh;30°08'00" West, for 69.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue ETCH •:~~e 6 ~ ~ ~ along sa/d Westerly right-of-way line, South 30°08'00" West, for 72.9 9 feet fo a curve concave fo the Northwest; 2. The Survey correctly shows fhe area of the subject property, the location and type of all buildings; structures ~q , 4,~~ ° " ,J, thence Southwesterly along the arc of said curve having a radius of 9920.00-feet, a central angle of 93°44`33'; an and other im rovements situated in the sub act ro e , and an other matters situated on the subject PARK PLACE LAND LTp• Tray r.•t~ ~,E;~Pr P j P P rh' Y V ' arc length of 460.52 feet and a chord bearing South 37°00'17" West, far 459.4 9 feet to a non-tangent line; thence • P.C.N. 172916000002300130 NF ProPe1tY ~ o, ~ 2 - North 46°0727" West, for 42.00 feet fo anon-tangent curve concave to the Northwest; ;henc~s Northeasterly along the arc of Bald curve having a radius of 9878.00 feet, a central angle of 93°44'33'; an arc length of 450.44 feet • . and a chord bearing North- 37°00'17" East; for 449.37 feet to a point of tangency; thence North 30°08'00" Easf, for 3, Except as shown on fhe survey, .there are no visible easements or rights of way. ~ Q ~ L + ' 54.91 feet; fhence North 14°52'00' West, for 96.97 feet; thence North 59°52'00" West, for 78.75 feet; hence South 4, Except asshown on-the survey, there are no observable; above round encroachments (a) bythe ~ ~ 89°54'49" Wesf, for 77.06 feetto the 3oufherly boundary line of said Lot 93; fhence along said Southerly boundary 9 ~ ti S ~ im rovements on the sub ec ro on a ' ` ' r rf streets oralle s or b b the7m rovemenfs 'r?+ ~o P 1 tP perly up dJommg p ope res, Y~ O Y P 0 S z Ifie, North 00°05'9 9"West, for 75.00 feet; fhence North 89°54'49" East, for 97.39 feet; fhence South 59°52'00" on ad'oinin ro cities, streets araNe's u on fhe sub act roe o' •ti Oo' ~ S> '8 J 9PP Y P I PPdY 0.0 S Easf, for 923.00 feet; thence leaving said Southerly boundary line, South 30°08'00" Wesf; for 97.00 feet; fhence. . ~ 0 S. . 0 ~ .,v~ ~ 0 ~r ' South 59°52'00" Easf, for 5.00. feet; fhence South 30°08'00" West,. for 20.OOfeef; thence South 59°52'00" East, for 95AO feet ; fhence South 30°08'00" West; far 32.00 -feet; fhence -South 59°52'00" East; for:! U.00 feet to the POINT • 5. The location of each easement, right of way, servitude, arrd other matter affecting the subject property and ~ ~ N , F ~y S85' 1 g'2 " ~Q ii t~4,~',>,: 1 E 23~ 19'21 "E 232.23' OF BEGINNING listed in the title commitment number200504491; date November 5, 2005, issued by Chicago Tlfle Insurance ~ ~ r F 4•.. w 9S a.-• ®RIGINAL Company with respectfo the subject property, has been shown on the survey, together with appropriate ~ •8 , , O h recording references, to fhe extenfthat such matters can be located. The property shown on fhe survey rs ~ DECEIVED:. REVISIONS:. the ro art described In that t1Ne commitment. The location of all lm rovemenfson the sab eat roe is Q 41' PPY P j pPnY ~ • in accord with minimum setback rovislons and resfrictlons of record referenced !n such title commitment 0 ry A tQ p ' I~UG 0 32006 0' 0 ~ Q 7 ,,t~ • ' ~ 12/12/05 RESPOND TO LENDER- COMMENTS, K.S./C.W. 05-12768 . PL~N~IIRlO gEPARi~MENT ~ >3 6. .The sublect properly has access fo and from a duly dedicated and accepted pubbc street or hlgnway. 0 CITYU~CLhARWl~TER 11/20/05 SVY.U.D. T/E-IN U..D. C.W./M.B. 05-f2768 ~ s ,h ~ N ~ FLOOD ZONE: This roe is Th/s property is located In Flood Zone X. - 7. Exce t as shown on curve ,the sub ecf roe doesnof serve an ad ornm roe for drains a utilities + S .0 P P m' P Y 1 P P rh' Y 1 9A p rh' g 7 G ,n~ o. Sy, or in ress or a recs. ~ ~ ~ S . 0 9 g QP ~ NOTES:. . 'ti o ~ ~ ALTA/ACSM L4ND TITLE: StJfv'VEY FOR: F 1, A!! information regarding r ` 8, The record description of the subject propertyforms a mathematicall closed figure: ~ ~ ry Y ~ ~n r9 hereon was gained from c ~tlon regarding record easements, adjalners; and. other documents thatlnlghf affect the quality of title to tract shown ~ 00 ~ O 2005 No search oflhe Pi as gained from commitment number200504499, issued by Chicago T/tle Insurance Company, dated November 5, search of the Public Records has been- made. by this office: . 9. No portion of the property shown on the survey Iles w/thirr a Special Hazard Area, as described on the Flood N 0 shown hereon, If any, .are in feet and decimal parts- thereof and are based on NGVD 29. Insurance Rate Ma Issued b the Federal Emer e GLENBOR U +h 2. Elevations shown hereon, A Y g ncy Agency for fhe: community In which fhe subject 0 GN FUND VIII N ~ 3, her r roe is located. ~ ,0 PARK PLACE BLDG. LTD. T p operty shown on fh ~rfy shown on the survey is the property described in the title commlfm~nt. PARK. ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC P P P c.N. 172s rsoaooo24oosoo W, 0 4. Unless !t bears fhe si nati • ~ P.C.N. 172916000002400400 g years the s/gnature and the or/glnal raised seal of a Florida licensed surveyor or mapper this drawing, sketch, platormapls forlnformat ~ a i listed above are entitled to re! on the serve and this certificate as bass Prue and accurate.. Y Y g 5. This survey cannot be tier ~p Is for Informational purposes. only and is not valid. , 'y cannot be transferred or assigned without the specific, written permission. of Wallace Surveying Corporation. ~ ® ~~~~~~f~ - 6. Except as shown, undergr shown, underground improvements not evident by a visual lnspectlon are not located.- ad® ~ 7. Underground foundations and foundations not located. ~IMMM WAMM 'CORP. ucaM W-AHM fmo . 8. Revisions shown hereon ~ Ciai apace shown hereon do not represent a "survey update" unless otherwise. noted, ooi NoafRP m PARKWAY, wn m. wEsr Pau KAcK naDA 3w7 • (say) uo-4531 9. All dates shown within the Profe i nal Surveyor ar?d Mapper shown within the revisions block hereon are for interoffice filing use only and in no way affect the date of the field Fleiu: F. G. cos NO.; 05-1276 F. K J74 PG- 1 surveysfated herein. Florid ertificate No. 3357 ded herein. 90. In some instances, graph! istances, graphic representations have been exaggerated to more clearly illustrate the relationships between OMCE: AB DATES ` 7/12105 DWG. NO. 05-1276 December 9, 2005 physical Improvements an scaled positions. nprovements and/or lot lines. In all cases, dimensions shown shall control the location of the improvements over SHEET OF sitions. C'K'0: C. W. REF: 05--1276. DWG' 1 7 D , L~ PUBLIC = C LENGTH ~ ~ A AR o o 0 A/C =AIR CONDITIONING ~ A.E. =ACCESS EASEMENT a o A.KA. =ALSOKNOWNAS ~ sroRM ,wiNHOie ASPH. =ASPHALT BLDG. =BUILDING y ~ L,e.2sro CGNC CURB 0.1'S. - B.M. -BENCHMARK B,O,C. = BACK OF CURB ~ " CGNC< -WALK B.O.W.. = BACK OF-WALK G/" o I (c~ - CALCULATED .89 5611 . • N ---357-. lR,4FF/C SIGNAL. a/H CAN _ CABLE ANTENNA TELEVISION ANCt+oR (1rP.) 0 raoN FENGE (1rn.) a/H . C.B. =CHORD BEARING P C.S. 3612 sANrrAar MANNGLE OCK STRUCTURE 0.1 N CGNC. CGLUMN (IYP. C.B.S. = CONCRETE BL - TION CONTROL LINE ~ NoRrH 11NE LOT 3 sroRM Mart"oLE C.C.C.L. -COASTAL CONSTRUC 40' STORM MANHOLE CH =CHORD . C.L.F. = CHAIN LlNKFENGE 0' 30' 60' 90' CLR. =CLEAR = RRUGATED METAL PIPE • ~ C.M.P. co N.44 561 ~ • a. t. o sto ~ SCALF: 7 "=30' =CONCRETE ~ ~ u GONG. WEIR 31RUC'dURE ~ ~ 35.36 I (D) =DESCRIPTION DATUM ~ ~w .POND o i ~ z D.B. =DEED BOOK j v 1 ~ s v D.E. =DRAINAGE EASEMENT to R.c.P a = DRILL HOLE ~ o D.H. F. ~ r 4 p/NI =DRIVEWAY Gv rNO swlMMiNC srcN I •EL. =ELEVATION coNc - MEN STGRM MANHOLE p1~ ENC. -ENCROACH T E.O.P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT ~G' GG c~ E.O,W. = EDGE OF WATER ESMT =EASEMENT F.F. =FINISH FLOOR FND. =FOUND 123.5' F.P.C. =FLORIDA POWER COPORATION H.C,P.5. =HANDICAP PARKING SIGN 6 - CGNC, CGNC. INV. -INVERT z ASPHALT I.T.W.C:D. =INDIAN TRAIL WATER CONTROL DISTRICT ~ L.A,E. =LIMITED ACCESS EASEMENT m 10 ALTERNATE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS WRITTEN BY~SURVEYOR: L:B. =LICENSE BOARD z ki L.W.D.D, =LAKE WORTH DRAINAGE DISTRICT 2s' ~ ~ Xt M =FIELD MEASUREMENT . LOT 2 -ALTERNATE DESCRIPTION: O M H. =MANHOLE A tract of land being all of Lot 2, according fo the p/af of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, as M H.W.L: =MEAN HIGH WATER LINE recorded in P/af Book 909, pages 10 through ? 1, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida, and lying MlN. =MINIMUM within the Northwest % of Section 17, Township 29 3oufh, Range 16 East, Pinellas County Florida, being more _ 2627 M.L.W.L. -MEAN LOW WATER LINE _ I particu/arly described as follows: . N.G.V.D. =NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM N.P.B,C.LD, = NORTHERN PALMBEACH COUNTY ~ aErArNlNC wnu • POND sroRM BEGIN at the Northeast corner of said Lot 2;. thence along the North boundary/lees of said Lot 2 the following IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT N.T.S. = NOT TD SCALE MANHOLE nine (9) courses: (9) fhence:Soufh 89°40'39" West, for 995.98 feet; (Z) thence North 59°39'49" Wesf, for 6T.6 ® feet; (3) thence North B~ °3755" West, for 52.9 9 feet; (4) thence South 72°25'38" West; for 41:99 feet; (5) thence O A. =OVERALL NO SWfMMlNG SlCN .North T5°34'35" West, for 49.82 feet; (6) thence South 83°04'43"-West, for 47.02 feet; (7) (hence South 41°38'34" 0 8 O.D. -OUTSIDE DIAMETER ~ r, L.B. 2610 West, for 41A6 feet; (8) thence. South 02°04'59" West, for 4.23 feet;. (9) thence South 89°40'39" West, for 965.65 0.1'S. 0/H =OVERHEAD UTILITYLINE t'7 0 ASPHALT ~ 0 = 0~~25 s46» feet fo the point of intersection with anon-tangent curve concave to the West, said point also being the point of O.R.B. =OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK ~ z I'1=.3~. ~ ~ ~ Intersection with the Easterly right-of--way line of Park Place Boulevard, as recorded in aforesaid plat; thence Southerly along said right-of--way line and the arc of said curve with a radial bearing of North 75 11.54 Wesf; 0/S =OFFSET ~ ~ P =PLAT DATUM. N co"c, O d , 2:T P.B. = PLATBOOK ^ B o 2.7 4.7 84.4' R= 6 9 and having a radius of 365.00 feet, a central angle of 15°19'54 ; an arc length of 97.67 feet and a chord bearing South 22°28'03" West, for 97.67 feet to the point of tangency; thence South 30°08'00" West, along said P.B.C. =PALM BEACH COUNTY n aACx~cow PaEVENTER (m?) , right of-way-line, a distance of 457.64 feet to the beginning of a curve concave fo the West, having a radius of = URE _ a P.C. POINTOFCURVAT t. 2000.00 feet and a central angle of 00°23'52`; thence Southerly along the arc of said curve a distance of 13.89 P.C.C. =POINTOFCOMPOUNDCURVATURE I:PC. PA ` ~ ,f;, 8 feet fo a point; thence South. 57°38'27" East, departing said. right-of-way line, a distance of 195.80 feet to a point; EN CONTROL POINT No swrMMiNC sicN ~gy~;r~a P.C.P. = PERMAN T ; ro I:;.~rts,, . a;,¢a; ~ 40' thence South. 32°29'33" West, a distance of 60.00 feet fo a point; thence South 30°13'59" East, a distance of . PG. =PAGE 3 CONC. CGNC. CONC. C. °'^""^:Na~ y 252.93 feet to a point; thence North 30°01'50" East; a distance of211.83 feet to a point; thence South 59°58'10" East; a distance of 990.00 feet fo a point; thence North 30°01'50" Easf, a distance of278.85 feet fo a point; P.1. =POINT OFlNTERSECTION Cl C~ f _ N ~V ~Fj••".t i L P~ SNP. 1 F~= ::^,.Iy ~t 1 6 K. A rr G E~ 4 'Q rk~i~,f ,..Z ilt ~ ~ ~ . L -MU~. r Y t• i y } yY, ~1 axr ~ . X,F~ . {r ES k G~ P ^s a 7 N 5~ a Y M a n a r r K r rrfii t "4 ` ~#~~4 ~ thence South 85°19'21 "East, a distance of232.23 feet fo a point; thence North 00°19'21" West, alang the East P/0 =PART OF : r.;~r~• , s~ra~'.-~ x sY t`~ i ~&~~3+ , :Y,x> • 't~~ r~~s ~ ~;Y!T i'L~ 31 ~ ! ~i ~1 ~yf 15 • r '~,v ,;E,~,a,I-std ~s~ B4~ i~l~yti ~,i~J id t ~1 i i } xr ~J ~„•,~'k<JX; ..S[. c "~Id't, 3: N .V7.': •~i,; r ~ a,.r\.~tt. ,,r,<£~;~F p '1bbn~ ,~i'` 6> e.CCl,~..^".~~,A~ ~ 1~i r ~D,Av s•1 ~:f9¢, ?Std Yrs Y+ ~j eA,._s<rs„ vQ1-~r t.n~:,~u,~7a. S~ 1~4,s.ia,C,j,: F >t'~S , , ~ar~Fr < dzS ~a vs~'1~11"!~. s`,-,s<7 r.a; .~ivs•~.'~•:~a~': ,fax!ln;~~i$t! w„•, ~ ~ a2,t P.0 B. = POINT OF BEGINNING • ~ of ;s~:~rx, ~~~o.~a^a;,,r;~dy:r'~ ~y, F _3 t.~~ ~,~,~;~~YF,;z,~~,,~;~;L~?~.r~.~.F..,_ .=:i.:.. _ ~ k=~'' L.B. 26l o line of said Lof 2 and the West right of-way line of Hampton Road (C.R. ?44) a distance of 564.52 feet to said. { ' O (L T ~ `~rv >~'~/1~1-llALl ASPHALT POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ..r.;,~~..<;F,r ~ ~ T p P.O.G. O .r~f;r, rY Inn"'*~,I-' 90 YI'AI ~I1 U. G, f IP. 0.1'S. Northeast corner and the POINT OF BEGINNING. P.R.C. = POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE ~zy~,: W V? <.a^.: ;~7,~ . (O.R.B. 90316, PG. 1020 G' j. P.R,M. =PERMANENTREFERENCEMONUMENT r, L..~s°°I [[•;'d`:::;; GG j ~ ~ LOT 3 -ALTERNATE DESCRIPTION: PROP. =PROPOSED :..I o ;x~;,,... ~bs:l 2 g ~ 3 A Tract of land being all of Lot 3, according to the plat of STORZ OPHTHALMICS, INC., PARK PLACE, as P.T. = POINT OF TANGENCY a ~ x z recorded in Plaf Book 109, pages 10 through 91, of the public records of Plnel/as County,. F1o11da, and tying PVM'T =PAVEMENT s.c. d ~ ~ within the Northwest % of Section 97, Township 29 South, Range 16 Easf, Pinellas County, Florida, being more (R) =RADIAL coxc. ~'1 ~F g. Hti~, particularly described as foNows: R =RADIUS °.~r:~~;,;;° • RGE. =RANGE ~Y;.&AC~IFLOW PREVENTER (m?) BEGIN at the Southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence along the Westerly right-of-way Ilne of Park Place Boulevard R.P.B. =ROAD PLAT BOOK '$r~=~-~ ki = RIGHT OF WAY I:};~~s~~,,,. r, b ~ II ~ O ..D and the East Ifne of said Lot 3, North 30°08'00" East, a distance of 316.53 feet to the beginning of a curve S =SURVEY DATUM ~ ~'~5'. " p ~ concave fo the West having a radius of 285.00 feet and a central angle of 58°53'31 thence Northerly, along the ~ ~ ~ ~ arc of said curve, a d/sfance of 292.94 feet fo the point. of tangency; (hence North 28 °45'31 "Wesf, a distance of S.C. =SIAMESE CONNECTION `I - tv ~~f';r>~ ~ 240.13 feet to the beginning ofa curve concave to the East having a radius of 690.00 feet and a central angle SEG. =SECTION ~ 0 PARKING SIGN ' 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ Of 32°15'06'; fhence~ Northerly, along the arc of sa/d curve; a distance of 388.40 feet fo the beginning of a SID =SUBDIVISION ~t I ASPHALT I,~ ,.4~,. - - reverse curve concave to the Wesf, having a radius of 610.00 feet and a central angle ofa°25'46'; (hence = S UARE FEET ;,;r~:~:. ~I S.F. Q #2621 I, - Northerly,. along the arc of said curve,. a distance of 36.51 feet to the point of tangency; thence North 00°03'49" S.F.W.M.D. =SOUTH FLORIDA WATER x~>44f~F~,l I 14 94 MANAGEMENTDISTRICT ~ M '~+y4;fti~ 93 I . ~ ~ ~ Easf, a distance of ?90.21 feet fo a point; thence North 44°56'19" West, a distance of 35.36 feet to a point; ~ D thence North 89°56'11 "West, along the North line of said Lot 3-and the South right-of-.way line of Drew Sfreef S.LR,W.C.D:=SOUTH INDIAN RIVER WATER q I (C.R.108), a distance of 357.62 feet to the. Northwest corner of said Lot 3; thence South 00°22'28" INesf, CONTROL DISTRICT ~ I rn departing said South right of-way line and along the Wesf line of said Lot 3, a distance of 1287.33 faet fo a - W I Ou,EyBALL S.R. -STATE ROAD Z V I N point; thence along the South boundary lines of said Lot 3, the following five (5) courses: thence North STA. -STATION. n I 89°54'49" East for 50.00 feet; (2) thence South 45°05'19"East for 208.00 feet; (3J thence North 00°05'11"West STY. =STORY ~ ~G' ASPHALT - ~ I . for 120.15 feet; (4) thence North 89°54'49" East for 97.31 feet; (5) thence Sauth 59°52'00" East for 153.00 feet S/W =SIDEWALK W co"a G PLAY I 3 b ASPHALT GRGUND , I ~ to said Saufheasf corner and the. POINT OF BEGINNING. T.O.B. = TOP OF BANK n Eau~PMENr ~ I T.O.C. = TOP OF CURB " :..BSI ~ • TWP. =TOWNSHIP ~ - / ~ _ J ' STORM ' . MANHOLE- TYP. =TYPICAL ITARY ~ ~ ~Y::, U C =UNDER CONSTRUCTION " xoLE r _ U ILt EASEMENT 26. U.E 7 TY 26. . ;,.,.,,<,I U.R. _ UNRECORDED - I`~~~~. ORIGINAL W.C, =WITNESS CORNER ,,,>`•,t. • ~ ~ RECEIVED - ~ '^~as!'Sfi CGNC, ' W.M.E. --WATER MANAGEMENTEASEMENT 16,6 ~ ~ - E coNC. >.Kx,,:I W.M.M.E. -WATER MANAGEMENT MAINTENANCE EASEM NT O sh:'~¢: x ONC ~lJG 0 3 2006 W.M.T. =WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT . ; ,>:'I~.; o 0 ,,}±1.~ o 0 PLANNINf~ DEPA~iP~I:Ni ~ -BASELINE kl _~eh: . CONC. ~ =CENTERLINE I~3~;,~;~;. coNC. CITY OF CLEARWi~"fE~z ;~'•~RE~A<NING WALL p = CENTRAL ANGLElDELTA 0.3 OVER D = CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND AS NOTED1. ~ o coxc. ASPHALT v~ D o 0 -CONCRETE MONUMENT SET (LB #4569) ` fi~1I z ai o c . = OD & CAP FOUND AS NOTED n ' ~~~~°,~sroP sicN i • aY'1 ~ h,is~~ 0 _ #5 ROD & CAP SET (L8 #4569) :•;I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~v' 0 =IRON PIPE FOUND AS NOTED ' ' 6 6 °<s3 ® =IRON ROD FOUND (AS NOTED) „ ~:iY: ` 2618 ~~E P e =.PARKER-KALONNAII FOUND ~ ~ ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SUf~VEY FOR. ~ =PARKER-KALON NAIL & DISK FOUND AS NOTED ,~cac, r ' r' ~zfvBliC'~6?r4--~~ ~43,~k` ,~r`»stt . r.• . L 6 " ~ t~"t4~Sf>i.l.,t6,.1~~•'3di;~, ~ ~z5: r, , x~;" ® =PARKER-KALON NAIL & DISK SET (B #45 9) ~ ~ ~~,u ~ I ~ ~v~MA~G =PROPERTY LINE » » ~'~~'i ~ ~ MATCH LINE A , - UTILLTYPOLE . , "4,x,,6: ~~s' ~ =FIRE HYDRANT ' - o r~~n BV.S .r1TaP PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC ` SHELTER ® -WATER METER • n ~••'w~ i ' n ~'k~'..>;,. n..... = WATER VALVE N 0 01 ! 1 F.~ F.P.C. PAD CORP. LICENSED BUSINESS f 4309 E - ELECTRIC BOX cb~~ c ~ KFLO~ 901 Nompow PARKWAY, mm 102..WESf PALM BEACH, RARIDA 33107 • (361) 0!D-Mi HOPS =SATELLITE DISH ool .a, ; n-l FIELD: F.G. JOB NO., 05-1276 F.S. J74 Pc. 1 CATCH BASIN:?f4:I N/l1 s, l KJ \ OFFICE: M.B. DATE: 7112105 MO. NO. 05-1276 C'K'D: C. W. REF: 05-1276. DWG SHEET 2 OF 7 A~ ~P 3z c~ ~ j 3 173 0' 30' 60' 90' SCALE:: 1 »=3D' . - - ~'O J ` ~'`o G~ ~ ~W r ~o ^ ~ NN _ . ~ . S~AO~~o~~ _ . t~~'" . . 6~ 8 . 12 0,, O ~ ~ 'r- - s ~~~r. 4t ~ ~ ~N ~ ~ ~ } fr\ .O r~ ~ , ~ ~ ~h 3 O aiF IGN ~~'~~t ~ ~ R~yEN~ ~ C ~ 4, 6 , IV89~~0'39f•., ~ 5r ~ KA~,~~ ' 47.4Q Off' pK„~ ~ ~ ~ ~i' ~ ~ W o „ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ o o a .~~e , ~ ~ ~ Z r~ J N I~ V 'n!'`~c AL '~~-~.~~~;~ss ~ 74.8' ~ . ~ RECEIVES ~,x'~~;~ ASPHALT: . 4 Q ~ ~,!.IG 0 3 2006 N z 3~ z W PLANN{NG CJEI'f,r~:: ,,,~x ~ CI1Y Of CLE F ~ ~S ~ . ;rte f4~~7tcF~•f+ ~ - s~'~ ,,~~ti~ , N75 L.B 2610 AL7A/AGSM LANO..TITLE SURY/EY FOR: i~ 835, y~~ ~s~ ,may ~ ~ t o f~` 1 PARK 'ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEI/ELC~PMENT, LLC. ~ , x N ~7 lYxYSF i 9! . IIp n~®u CORP. tx~ttStt~BUSiK 14509 slot tsoat PARKWAY. SURE im WEST PAW KgK nomu w o so-1 31 37.0 ' go -4, 29 F R/Ck 2 :.Y~~ o FIELD: F. G. JOEL No.: 05-1276 F. El. J74 P0: 1 , Hc. S. OFFICE: M.B. OATEN 7112145 M. No. 05-1276 c•K'U: C. W. REF: 05-1276. DWG SHEET 3 of 7 , ASPHALT :;I . #2606 ~ 3~.~ _~,~~::~i ~ CONC• f;~ CONC• .ass J N ' ~ NO »p » 1 s s Ci ASPHALT SWiM ,.t~,,~,.: M/NG D .t E 8 ~ N ~ /A s,~. S IN G CH .i ~ T ail. ~c 'i'~ na4:r~•, ASPHALT II. '.t~~: _'?7.F~ ci NUM r'. A~P ft~, z ~NCFgt ~ ~~o ~;.~a;,; ; u CONC. P CONC ~ ~ 1;v~« P 9V ~G ~ a P~~s ~ ~ . W S.40 38 34 "IN. 41.06--- r~R~>wx~~ ASR ~yEgp ~a 4 ,~~,it~~ I S. x~; ~s ~ . ~ ~ S. 02.04 59 ~N. 4.23 ,~s ~l r I ~ ~ ~ , ~75..,..,~: > „ l ~ ~~x,~ , i, ti Ol 0,1, ~ .a ~~.v ~ ~~y. N~`•y~, ~ t.B. 2s1o POND gg,~, z~~h D ~ , ~ (Rqp~ ~4'w o. ~'E S.89'40'3 - . h ~ •es~. z - ~ ,y,.f~ ~~S I .7k, ~S'Ctl ~ CON~'c. CO,. , 1~ ,~t QONp Aq ~ 9 "W ~ 65.65 ~~~,1:~ MATCH UNE B N. R Shy 2 k '.r'iq~:"+,' 100.10 ` y1A .'h' ® t.B. 2610 . I\ahVo.•~~zt.:. ~si {tit. 1ER ~ .J r .,Y . ~ CONC. VYALl. ~ t~ ~u, ~ ~ ~ ~ = 15' 19'55» wlTNE3S CORNER 3S. .yam-~;. s~oR~ `I~i z~``~~rr ~Qti 1W", C) ~4° ~ 7,°1 yr ~~ty~'~' 7 ~ ~yO~ A-97.67 `.~iJ;,?~i<~0~>MS,'3t = E'~'`A'~k~. S.7pb~ ec y~+~ r"~ , ~ 'mss; t FR ~ 6 , k• ~ 't~1e J,..~ . O Spq , ~.t~~ ~ n: , . , t' 4a~ Et J U ~ g dirk. ~O -78.7. . J ~ u o <,~.5 ` ~ ; Cukr~;.. ~Tt t~s^. ^ 0 , o 0 9' ~ r~~~~: o~ y R_36 ~ ~ ~ 5. DD . ~'Y `i' C.B. =S22'28'O3"W r s; n, j ,~~,fi ~ ~ + n,~;e,~~, ~~~i~ ~ ~ POND 2 `~fi i~ t ~y t V4 2 is ~ 9J, >.rN;>1b~,,, 37.8 Pq~ ~ 22 r . ~O ' . " ~ try 'A `~J~`;n~, !Ck p2 ~ G s CS !'.~Yr ~p ,FMS .;r~" /y c.o~ 2 . .p C fns., y.C•P ,r. ~P.`~]~ . o, r, E; c ~ xy ~ ~ ~ be ~ N ~ :r'r, ~.z~../ Q . N ~ l.~ . ~ E A' ' 0S\ry 4 ~ t~i 1 ~ Jl`~r.Y1.. ~ 1 1 yLIF~,~C;T 32 • G~,~' ~..~~,_•SV1W frt~plmN~f~~ dPh~ by y0 ~ o ~ CONC. ''wf;.;~" ASPHALT gyp. 3 ht 1 r w~ u~~ , Y, 6 pe ~R,Fs/ RF • o ~ ti~~ ~ ~r \ ~ ~ r rb~ A~ NG 1 L Q N : A Q 'y S T SIGN ~ iy ` , ~ y~, ry , ; "ry`yf~F~ J o ~ • olp,~N t<r 44 S/ W'~k ,'Sfn~, ~ O s . v x,113'/.( R _~},n J.N ' ry1 0~~. 1. Q ASPHALT CAZE80 C a ,,,r ~ t ai~p ,,#a~4 / tetra.;.' '`ry . Jay C~• V~ ~tj4y +1r ~l,FVi'.b 1~~.tKldr~ s , ~ att l' ~tv3, p : t4 . • ~ .ASPHALT oo . ~ ASPHALT. ~~f~r~ t . , . sio ,~~,,r; hj+ ~ y Q 0.2' h~i \ ,.,ylj~i1~~ . sr J~JD r co Ns tm' » » FENCE CORNER S~ r~r~ F(~t,, GO~UM G ~ _ a• ~ ~ ? MATCH. L 9 ~~,,,~-q !NEC 0.3 CLR. ~A s a ~ ~ y ¢~~~ti I` ~~`~Y4~+~ak1TtY r N.89 54 49 E. ~ - ¢ ~ ~ ~ . P.R.M 7722 ~s F ~ ~~R~x 1:~~r~~%`~n. O.tEO.IS ASPHALT Ate; rya ~ ~a ti S£E DE? ~ }ta^~r~~: 4' ~ e~ONC. 50.00. o t,~~~ ~ ~.a, sror a ..;;3,.,,,,~.:., . ~`'~+.a, IS' C~ FENCE CORNER 0.4 CLR, 0.2'E ~P/C\ r ~<r~,? ~ i, . N I! _ 7.31 c .R.M. 3612 p~H , ` ~ 0 FR o. r ~,o. ~ s SOUTHERLY LINE LOT 3 ° °9' `'oi a a ~ cep G~ 0,~• ~ ~ . w ~ . ~ ~ 0 2,~ ~s ~~:x~{ • ~ ~,yo .S . °0• ~ 1 t ~ Q tS~..~;,; a ~ ~ ~ r. ~s 0 ti ~ ~ ,G ~ v ASPHALT r~ ; <s-~~`~~~ ~ ~ ~y.~ ~G L~t?~lL N .'+b'~~~ 4,~~^{~•~` JJ. ~i:?f,i;~,~.r x~ic <``rr ~'Q y~C'Qv 7 N F a POND So• ~ ~ ~ ~ oQ ~~~~-~~'a' Q. 1h~Y'i t ~ ',`L~t'b"}~i itlv~k f 3~l\ ~y~r"l~ / .~t F.,l~7ik~yr~Yj ,Q - ~I _ Q ...•;a~ ~~r A~, ~ "y` ~ ~ ~ `l~; t "w ~ a~,~ .ay~='y,°~' ' ~C hSe~ , a'h"Y.7. i Y ~i: .4f~}/~ 7 57.~1i3` • \t'l~n ~j v' 9 F 0G ~ rs S, D wo d cSy t~,°~,.. ~ Tr si .s~ e^ U.. t~gh XA:1 y"r 1O ~ ~~y S n~ O~ J ~ rF J, 0' o:.Q O~'•,~~~ ~ 589.54' S9 W 8, ° ' ~ Q• o. ¢ moo, •Y. +a 1 V p- ~ fs oo.~J s Q ~ ~ ,y .l •oo. ~ 77.06 S,g. ~ ~ ~ o 7 ~ <~~~'i3ie''r` ~ ~ } ~ O + l.~ T°p si / ~ a 1t~ `~~L~~s"~. ~~~c,~'^ .~C ~ ~,~r ~ z~ 9 ~ G' ~l c 3 r ,/sue°~~1~.?~ ~ir~ ~ t ~Q~//p~ p° ~ ~ rl , O S?, ~ ~ o? 1. o°,• rs G• c, ~ !y 'OO• ~ ~0 A 8 o ~o 0 30 30 90 ~ S?• , ,,,~i \ •p~ "Y tint .`;!a f t ~dr J. / s O''•~•• . Op, S 0 6 e x, ~ ~ y ry . G a A~, 0 D ~ - .~~~Y,-ter ,,y rt?F~ ti~iY~;~ ~ Q~p Co \ ~ `7 N rf" C ,ha r ti 0',4j g' +r , /s .has 6 V ~ SCALE: 1 =30 y ,.~y~ • p. VW'~ (tra r ~ ' (Ty ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ .,yak c~t~~ A t1V ®~~~~~4 t ti~'~\ '~f.B.210 ~ ' 'J 6 0.f ~~~~,1; ~ ti 9 ~F, ~ 0 1 1 ,Q ~ ~ 4Q' ~ r , ~ o~ ~,,w ~ o ~ ~k, h ~ ~ ti o ~ ~ .f G 1' wJL\ . ~o ~ .q ~ h . V o 0 I' .o ~ -~;r Su, A~HALT t , r . y ,o ~ o `h ,e't~ i y. ~ 1 ! ~ S / .0 r~ Q , ~ G w~ ~N {€`,,~ai~ . ':~:k~~ fix ASPHALT . 8 ' 5 ~~~d ~P~:~ ~~apa~ p0 L FS"~}r I Y.k~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ a• Y : Cj 1 G0~ o , . @ x o g1 u f;~;: t. °°N Ncs'° ,'~~<;1 r0 G ~ 74.E RE~EIVE~ ~ _ 3 t ~.~ly~$r? .O r,rF, G , . 1~,~~~~a ~p \ ~ NNII~G ~3Fws ~~9T 4 ~ ~ ~ ?pJ T CITY f>F CLEAf~Vv~i~:~! k.,~ I £ k t . ~3 ~ ~ 0 , 3 0 ~ t~ ASPHALT , w , ~ i x~.. ~ N ~ p- ~ » ~ <ci•s S o s.{ t""gift; , . ~ , ~ / _ ~N` . ~ A-13. ~ ~ ~.r 89 . ~q ASPHALT ~ fjf~ `s~ ~ D f ~ .pry , >t,,..~~.1 `F.~a 3 \ Ate ~ ~ f~ oGOOti o R-2000.00 ~ ~ s,. C.B.-S30 i9 56 W ~ . FNO. L.B. _6707 -ATOP 2.TX2' .CONC. COLUMN 0.2'E J ?'s ',A y 1~t po ASPHALT '~~"F.j~ \ ~~s`=r; ~ ,a ~ ~ o S89 54 49 W 97.31 r ~ ~ , P ti ~o. G t w ~ ~o 1.,7•,,.. {,;a.'` ~ r AL~TA/AGSM LAND Tl TLE SURVEY F+JR: A ~yLS \g }~3 X54 ~ 0 S, J ~ ~E"3 0~ 9S ~ o si co s p tz„ y~c'~ t,',4 ~t~ ST~p 7 Jk 4 o, s S o • ~ • ~ . Og. ~ Q f~ °GpcFp' ' SS P ~ ~;is . ~ s~~ PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC 0 0 lp~ ~p • 71P i9 G ; a + rx t 0 S CORP. ucaaEO eusRlESS 1369 q 901 NORTHPORI~ PARKWAY. StNTE 102, WEST PAW OEAII, ilG3d0A 33107 (561) R10-1SS1 S. PG. d +G~ ,ps ~Y„~ 6 coy boa No.: F. FIELD: J74 1 F. G. 05-1276 r~ Q r k AC A J OFFICE: M.B. DATE: 7112105 Dwli. N05-1276 3 u ryy VWD: C. W. REF: 05-1276. DWG SHEET 4 OF 7 ~ N.89 54 49 E. 97.3 1 s~, .R M. 3612 ~ 8 0 ~ o~ .a {x~~ ® `y `0~X~3_. b h ?~a?; 0.1 E,o.1 s. , SOUTNERIY UNE LOT 3 - ° '`~"~~0t~ eo r,~~'£r 1 12. 1 ran i ~ J~ ~ Q~ v o 'h ~ ~ s=~. • o e, a ~ . o A y. N y ~ V I ~ POND ~p• s ~ ~ w oQ ~-0~~~,E ; s y • J o b r s~ Q t CSC : 0 ~Y \ .0 ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ,~r ~ roSr~>, ,O ~ 6 ~ ~ G ~~t ,r~~Er~ yµ.~~~ ~ <9,~ 'p~of.o ~ 77.06 NS F 0 ~Pi~,.~~~a, 0~ . ~ NS 0 0 .0. G, ~,Y~ ~ a , ~ • G, 'o, J 'r~C.y ,~.~F?;/.. ~~>.z~ rY ~ ~ .mac 9• ~ ~ ~ v ? 7- i .lam •FT 4 O ~r :Y~ { l 1 ~g. ~ G A ~ ~ . r o r c` ~o~ • , h 0,~ g• Go r V - .J G 'e; sfo. 0 ~ ~ c#' w o.f E q,~s. . - ~ • ~ ~ , 'h ( a ~ ~ o ~ h ~ . ,o o• .0 yip r:. ~ o ~ ` ,wil ;'HALT 3 . ' °1~.. e c~ % . T •o ~ N y A ~ .o A Q • ~ ::s ,t ~ / ®~'t' `>~~oA Y .A ASPHALT O f 5~ QQ4 F? ~ ` a~4~ .,.F o Ca ~ ~ ~ Q / o ~ M G 0' ~ ~ k r,„1 ~ ro ~ ~ ~ s ~~vr ~ ~ r _ GJ ~ N~ oti ~ . ~o ~ F .1 ~p~ 1 y 1 `~r . art 12 ~ is ~ S O - 1 ~ :J si ' 6 G A O ~ ; ti ~ 4, Q ~ G - s~ _ G ~ o 0. J ~ #p " ~ O v~ - a ' ASPHALT Gt 4,, t J~•,\ ~e. N ~ ~ ~ • L~Q k52 ' p ,~'~'VSS~}~~11 _ Irk, • 2 y GO - `}1 ; ~ ~ r , ~ G yak, , ' , 0 3o so so _ A-13.89 ~ ; o . AsF ~ .h - •u F , a,•:, , a• R=2 ASPHALT - ~n 3 Y ~ ~ r~~{` ;r. Xb a. Q0004 ` C,B•=S30'19 56 W ;raH~k ~~si'~ M ~t,'~,14 ~ ~ ~ Yei t trtl ' c £ Rr Ek~~tf`r ,~Ct' E: 1 30 w \t~ r ° ~ ~ , . ~F11 cby - ASPHALT ~ 1 ~~~'i~~~7 ~ G ~tw r ~ M P N o•• v° ~k°° pry ~ , G°... ,cu 1 ~ ~~'i ~.r. - 1,~~~ r. _ ~ _ w ( ~S y~~p„c f.,tt,5~s' . A /1 fro x r f ~ ,r~. ,y* Y. F m 0 Q' o V`.. CF G' i ~~x i~urf~ 'iLY ib ~l%r ~ ~ _ r 2 ~ ~ O3 0. o o s . , . 1 L 'i l o• ~~,s'fi'r p ~ f'^~y-ri trrtV~ N - - f~.xl .r ~ y; 'X1s t,f`,Y.. F.' ~V /2~x.:`~jn~' _ ~ , 2 ~f~JS A,~t J' - • . - • ~ ``ice ~~#.I~r 'P. ~y0'~y O~0' F ~ -,a~. .q. , V.. Q ,r moo' ~ ~r~ 12 1,3 ~ ~ ~~C ' ~ G r j , _ ~ ~ . . ~ _ o• ,~A s + o~ ~~us~..: q 0 - ~ e~~,M Y: q~ ~ ~ fr rNi • _ r / O• ;fir rrs *•x~'„' O 14 ASPHALT ~ `'~r N~, s s ~t qua CoH o x~~„ i 0: , ~ .u. 0 ~ J ~ ~ , ai~tt,3... Pii' - _ _ ~ "C ~~/C~ _ z ss~'V ti~. 1 1 @ ~ asp ::,w~x~~•:/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? .,:gin • ~ 'h ~ 1 78 k. coN~ C~~ c CONC. ~ . • G • ~3 fi rt F N~, ~ 1 Q ~ ~ 6'AC~~A, 1 ry Q ~ 1 ~ Q •0 o• ,r ~o 5 ti P 0 ~,Si~< ~ ~ e, . ~Q• II ASPHALT oso _G, v: o I ~0 e ~ O~j ~2 ~ o ,Yu,: Q 0 F r ~ 6 ~ d s„K~ E G' O~ ? si , , y ~ 1. >,l 0' o 0' ~ s t ~o- ~ ~ „ 0 t` ,~r;;. . ~r ~ s ;,z ~fi - Ti n ~ , h 01. G'Q~c V' i ' ~ N ~ ~ • Q ~r• q~, O J g ~g• • c~No W 4~? ~ ~Nc Gv • , O. Gv, 1 ~O~ ' G • i • . - 'h ~ , ~ Q Ct~ m X43 9Q o~G• : tU / , • r cb~ 3~.9 O~ S c coNc ORIGINAL- ~ RECEIVED o~ N ~ ~ t3~ Oy N ~ • 'O ~ O. . ~O~ NNING DEP/~~TMFNT o36.~ pLA MO CITY QF CCEARWATER 7 • ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: .PARK•ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, LLC 1 ~~a FENCE CORNER 0. f' OVER • ~ \-RR.M. 3612 E. 0. 1 , AMURCE uRvE CORP. LICENSED onNESS # 1589 001 N01iRtPW PARKWAY, WE 102, WEST PAW BOf51, nWUDA 35407 ~ (581) "G-1551 FIELD:. F. G. JOB NO.: 05-1276 F.B. - J74 PG. • ? OFFICE: M.B. DATE: 7112105 DWO. NO. 05-1276 . own CWO: C. W. REF: 05-1276. DWG SHEET 5 OF 7 G• 0 ~ , y 1 Q ~ , a~ SAS v h ~a~ ~ ti ~ p t. 0 1 , 0 s4 55~, ~ a ~ ~ z F, ( +i'Y' x- Cti4 : +1' ~ t~~"="C.y~ ~ _ "?K,z~IF''.~"..~>''' a '£~'~s+'~S~•9 g :s =r,- .^1g,.~ r.,, _ ,>a. , W C~ 0' w °o ~ ~0N ~~.k~~ p~+'~ ~j E' ~ r.. v G• •g~y Y ~~v~ : ~ reir 7r~ tT~l of 4w ~ - _ ~~~.l.i. +~~3~'~'~ii ~MS~~ ~ ~e ~+lMY~ ~ F ~Qq ` .3 " ,j ~,,~c~~,~ ~N~~rY~ ~ .i ( '8 f`Y ~.:fhv: ~ KS -?'it'~ ,~~~'~utN 'SX~~ i~~Yriv' 7 ~-1 ~~.JC•'~i&iuR~ ~ ~ 'i,4, ~ , ~rnWhs% J s ~ MATC ~p V 6 0~ a,,~;''; MATCH LINE::. "D" U ~ z _ caN MNS f~ ~ ~ y ~ GC~~ U ~ _ . ~ b' Q~ :o ,;r.: c DoT 2 . ~ ~'coNc' '~NiN o A • o g\ . _ o tN'lr~a'•~Si~'!?: sl\ ;:O.~ti.. Ir:~4i ,G~,.: . ~~?e"~,~:~s~~~~' Coy C f,. ,,:.:c b ~'VS"~„**.1 \;~~`--''~'°va~' Q ...11,E^.:r•.';'? ti ~ 0 8. , N to . ~ - ~ ~ N ~Ui.act .c A j,~.,.~4~ I~ ry ~ .,•.N.F~f r.,<r..,.~., ~ , o o. Ay ~ r4.gr ~'s,;r..,r f. A ,1'~, • ~o ~ ~ ? • o ASPHALT o s`<>:,y/ ~,1,{, `y, ~~``4 ~ v0 \o~ i2 y..,r , ~ Y~.~ ,gib f o / / J L. ~}}l~ 7 (7 V % G.SI,: .>n` ` yf~ `t JfJn;ivi'/ t.1 jt-•h;.yA I \ Q.. /Q~. A '~,,xr;. I~' 5 'Ai~'7f ,fx~ y"~J'^Y y~ JJ~1/~ J ~`V ` V ~~7atrv,~{ r ~ `'4 ~,1~{.j~a) ~C3 ,0 Q '(fit .."~-Pw.~ p \ ~y, a' Y l q N ~ 0 `Q 0' ~s Ig,. y . 'p / :'d`::~~ f ps ~ • p "rA ~i'~ FC - r. sANlTaar' • MANHOCF /i• 'I' (~CfYRI'Y: 1V I'4~7 I{~F{~n/Sr1'"SfM1er ~'y~, i.. ry o rnAF>:rc Z s~cNAC eox \ F G 'r. z o ~ 4~e, .,.'J,L+';. op x'0,1, 'b' ~O o • \ 0 °k i.:.;~:. °N off. c+o co J- ~ y~ Ci . ~r; ..~YY~ ~ ~ F h .f"~,~.. Yet J .~,~,i /r. z N Q C ''~`~r, / 41yklr' f; ~~ti; y : ~P t/ \ A?, / O . «r,,a>d a ~ f~ c / STORM WATEJ STORM WATER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT j (O.R.B. 9591, PG. 29} ~ ~ x'~r !/fr.~A HALT `rh" ~r~ O k ~ ~ ~ /~1 {R ..r~ i~~ r~ 8 ~ ~y,~~ ,~~;-~~;nn./ ~;us~ l ASPNALI' . z z ~~arQR. ~ ~o. G' ~ ~ I ~.~nl ~ ~ ? , ~ 2 i PONO N 1 1P^ i~ ~ \ b S ' ''JA\ \ a ~Nc , ~,,k . ~ C, Nq N s ar. ~:u r ~F ~Yp fir; •'}A _ s A ? Y~;l O ~V' I ~ J ~,I~Y 15 ~ J ,,hf:: ~ ov '?ajrYr•tK ~ v ~ ~~z: 0 ~~'h 0 ~;:~r ~,1,. ~Vy ~ ASPHALT ;1111 ~ ~ ~ : 0 yj a 0 .A ,C 1, _ , © ' ~ SAO CONC. HEADWALL ~o AsPNACr I,IV~F~,I .;s _Y~~<r `9G<r ;j ;?fit°" pG.~o,~, ~f.,, ~ ' " A'0 a~'' G . c~ ,rM1~ ;.J '~/~3~+AC; ~''"fir ~ ~pyC~ ;~:{K 4rr/rY, lK. Ifl:1 'I' 'f'1 i .l s ~r,'~/ f~-, r Cr, f4k 1,/. '^yk;J ~ - ~ ~-~/Y.'.~'~ Yfili"~~:I v ~ ~ I~, °Oy ASPHALT ;~Q ~ s~~~„~~~f<i~ o~ o~~. \ POND . 4 ll~ ~ ~:l~;ti 1)ej~\ :.n[ *2 - '~akf, to .?r 1~'~,1. CONC RETAINING WALL 0 p. s~; .j°irr+la `til ~ a / k~'' ~n o CATCH &tSIN ?4~ 4~. 36" R.C P.~-~..~ • CONC. ALK 2.2' V p1.b bide. ~~~Y \ .J ,tY?' 0.1'E. z`~ "a'-rs~t. iur._~~;5 ~~n, 7~osr c,r,-,.-~•.~ ,y-.,, INj ` ~ . wr ! S e . V' ;.ti ~v"?.r1 ~ ~qi 11 t' ~a't~.s~' y'p L'.?;vu" ~~1 ~ `I `C "~"S `iY to i..Ka'.fL`Sb.`a:"" _ ~ L'i+. f ~ - ~ ~~2 ~~15,. .fix I t(Z+i'n./{dfl'A }~"~«~M`'~l~~ D ~ - q o ~ ~,.~:,s , N t, ~ , sip ~ ~ ~ ~ 'ir`,:'~i~,F! ~ ~ r,'R i o a 6?`~ ~'II ..r1. na /f 5 f • +'-t:n~•t~j°S$An1i '~M1Vy=: ;°~h 11..e .il ~ 4 z~.tie•~, a '7 t~ ? ~ ~»x~~?v' C - - ~i.:~+,~+'I A •^.~wy' '".r F\ Orb :iC`.;, ~~r o ; r/ : jY air ~ hf, A sF lf~ ~r.y 6 1 c ~,~,,sy~,1,rt , coNG;. o.: q cG ~,o R : r,~ ASP l ~~s ' y, nr,Px;~~,t~., ~ '~'Fi ~B 'h HoNSO ~,Ij,,~ i4 HALT ~ oN s,x~~,L~~ S'~ 4~ t,oo . ss~z ~ ~~,~`'S, . HOST AND •1• p~ ry}r ~;r'r. . ~l N~; (!,?s~ ~A R 0r ~ ~~~~~y~ ~ '~yi: /{1~in/~~~ WIRE FENCE 7~'~~;~ t A !y f. . O V ? ~ :7;q,;^"~'.,,. ,.'~Szr.?:~ lrst~;yx, ~s ~r~,F / w;: 1 , . C c 6 :r , e~ 78 ~Y,,~ . ~ ~ r sF, , , 5 V O .,f<•• ' / ~ ASPHALT so J ~~;y.wY;. ~fi, . (.Q~Myr. A. ~ ~ f( Y,xi/ / 4' V ~ / w~•;..,. v 1..,. h ~ O /5y;r t; ORIGWAL RECEIVEa h ~ v ~ r~/yc;A o~ ~ o0 . ~L~,IG 0 3 2006 ~~;~w h 4}~ • N Q~.' ~ ~ f0 0' 3Q' 60' 90' PLANNING.~ENr~~ItViENT 't'p ~ ~ CITY' O` CLEAE~~NATER 0 o,, ~ h SCALE: 1 »=3D' • 9 S' .0 15' ~ S ~ o , p ~p to oo ~ ~o ~ . ~~o F' N0 ~ ~ NQ v , - - t cr~ 2 O, , ~ G• ~ h o~ W pc ~ ~o' ~ m ~ 8 ~ o, • tT ~ 9 a ~ ' ~ 0~ • ALTA/AGSM LAND T/TLE SURVEY FOR: 0 ~ 0 ~0 9 1s No rh , Np ~ +y ~2 ~ o' N • PARK •lSLE COND4MlNIUM DEVELQPMENT, LLC tT pt F `psi h a,.? 00 n CORP. ucEmEO mmmEss ; Ono 901 K"OPOWY Postwar, sane 102. WMr Paw KAm nom 3W7 *.(sac) e40-Ml FIELD: F.G. JOB NO.: 05•-1276 F.B. J74 PG. 1 OFFICE: M.B. DATE: 7112105 DWG. NO. 05-1276 C'K'D: C. W. REF 05-1276.D WG SHEET 6 OF 7 0 k ~ ~3 ~v B N ~ 5~ ~ CI'I... ~ AT a q T ~ ~ . . . H ~ O ~ 44 ~ ~r ry e B , a,~ R 61• ~y,, 4 Q, r3 ~ a ~ ~ '~0 i. ` . w,c ~ SAC N89 40 39' . 4,4 _ e 12 31 » .40' 47 • o ~ ~ 4~ - - . 1 Q > ~ ~ ' o . w .k ~ o 9 ,,6 :a- m D 9 1 D 9 ' a ~ o, ~ 5 Q ~ 0' 30' 60' 90' • M W 0. 13 ~ 1. rn G~ .1~ S N a N 9 • ~ ~ o ~ ' 4 o %191 ' SCALE: 1 "=30' ~ ~ ~ A- o Q N89 40 39 E 218.08 _ • ~ . o° a .o W N o~ . ~ ? • 11 ~ O ~m • O • ~ • ~ ~ N. 75 34 35 II ~ . ~ 41.82 ~ J • ~ ~ W t~ ~ Q ~ . ~ ~ . ~ N. i Q 41.06 8y „IIV. 0 38 34 "W 3 S.4 ~ 3 W 4 5 4 5 0 3 .8 S 5 2. 2 1t 0 7. 4 N 4.23 . P.O.B. PARCEL • ri S.02 04 59 9 Q` 3 _ r yy..~~ S.E. GORNER LOT 1 • J4 ~_d • ~ ~ 9 SOUTH LINE. LOT 1 & NORI N.E.. CORNER LOT 2 ~T 1 & NORTH LINE, LOT 2 • S, 72.25 38 8 POND O . ~ ,y, . cs ?sro ~ 5.89 40 39 . ,s,,. o.lE ~ 41.99 0'39 "W. 195.18' 43' s4 w i-65.65 R 89 40 39 ~q 5. D/ • 93:63.' a, ~ 100.10. • WITNESS. CORNER NESS CORNER P.R.M. 3512. x GB. 2610 W.S C W.S:C. 0.2'N. • ® • ~ ~ WITNESS ,CORNER ~=1519 55 POND I ~ . . ~ -97.67 y A F _ -365.00 R ,f ~ • ~ = 3 W z ; / C.B. 52228.0 0 op Z , . POND 8 • A . . 0 r ~ °rF ~ ~ STORM WATER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT v .;.,yq (O.R.B. 9591, PG. 29) I goy ~ rn • o ~ .,e u o'` ~ \ \ ry,~1 ~ ~ \ \ '~A 00• ~ ,C v 2 o \ A ~ \ G, ~ P~ ~ • y~ ~ -.a GO • ~ CONSEFZUATION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ o~ ?o ~ NATURAL AREA P x I . e~ ~ ( ) Q1,~„~~ ~ ^ ASPHALT 0 o~ ` ~ o J. iry ti ~ h •s c~ . • x ~ 6~~ i i1LYd~~ ~ r 1I fl ~ • z ~ . ?~o Cay MATCH LINED . 0 yC ~ ~ AS G' 4~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~~y ' q~O ' A pp~~ ' c~N V l C Q .R 0 ~ . 'Vyiy . Q o Y : c ..y.„ . ~ ~ . .g~ ~ Dy x ~ c ~7 ~ ~ N ' ~k ~0 ~ ~ ~ ti fp I ~ ORIGWA . . ~ ~ o ~ ~ RECEIVED 0 3 2006 • ~ ~ Pa11G m U PLANNING (~EF~~t~~w~}NT o ASPHALT o ' , ~„~z/ :,~f ~ \ 2 ~~s Ka r~ ~~~i~ ~ yt ~744Cn, ~a 0 N Q C1N OF CLEAR~~AoE~ 0 r J~ Sh SANITARY a., ti a~ O TRAFFIC f.~ • r x •~A • sicNAL eox I ~z~}~~~ g r roo iN~ y,l `,v~~,~~~ ~ , Foot. Aoo . ~ ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: . O z wy ~~«.,n . , ~ o ~ » ~2 ~~,ti~ ;.fig 4. W h~fyy5~~+ ~S ~y~/ ''jib]\. ~ .s~ ~O\` O~ ,xta.;,,• .:,fir ~ C G' ~ PARK ISLE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT, L~.C o ~b ~ Z s ..pre 4~J\ g~. N AADD~ .u.eueen euewrce ¦-~[ee Y 4> Uri ~ ~ • _ ~.5. ~ A\ t,6 / STORM WATER MANAGEMENT E45EMENT 901 NORTFlPO1Hf PARKWAY. SUITE tOZ. WEST. PALM DFAC11. FLORIDA 3d/07 (361) E40-4551 17 ~4 w rna,{.?~ ~oR \ D:R.B. 9591, PG. 29 3 ca ~HA U OFFICE: M.B. DATE: 7/12/05 owc. No. p5-1276 ASPHALT 8 LC,'K F.G. ,ias . No.: 05-1276 F e. J74 ec. 1 N C. W. REF: 05-1276. DWG SHEET 7 OF OM POND CURVE DATA EXISTING PROPOSED BRICK PAVER MEDIAN 3 MEDIAN "ON-SITE" BRICK CURVE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA SYMBOL DESCRIPTION ~ v . p, _ N 15" RCPP~ f Z " ' PAVER ROADWAY CI 2000.00' 13.89' 6.94' 13.89' N309'56"E 0ffP3'52" LIMITS AND DESIGN C2 365.00' 97.67' 49.13' 97.38' N2228'03"E 199'54" ® STORM SEWER INLET ~ ® BAY V ~ F 0 BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE) EX. 8" SAN. S 8"SAN CLEAN cl CHINA BERRY 18' o SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE OUT cl V ° ' CITRUS le- CA. 0 ~ ~ r ~ . Ex. e° wM WATER MAIN BE ~ ~ -6"WM O DEAD Q ~ / PI s' ~ 250' LEFT TURN LANE ® MYRTLE ~ y ~ s• NIA FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION (FDC) FDC ° ~B• FH O OAK 15 CONC. SIDEWALK \ 25' BUILDING ACK ~ (Q PALM ~ AND F NT I~ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (FHA) FHA ~ 6• to s Q PINE g • TOP OF BANK (TOB) Dy UNKNOWN P oA 10 PROPOSED 8" WM EXTENSION LD'r $ o- ~ ~ g c B' 6• ~ 15' BUILDING SETBACK ~ ~ IB 6-S 0~ ~ 6. 4, 0 • • ACOE JURISDICTION IMITS / ` B~• NIA / \ pl PI 18^\ r APPROXIMATE ( PARK PLACE ~ ~ 0~• PI ~ ~ ~ 0 ~j . 19• PARK PLACE BLVD. IS SHOWN FOR • PI~• INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND WILL / \ h PI\\ PI •j. 18• \ 4 PI T ~b N!A BUILDING NUMBER 14 TRACT I OF PHASE i \ ~ o~/ Mb 9. BE SUBJECT TO A SEPARATE PERMIT. 0 25 50 100 / / \ \ PROPOSED 6' H CHAIN LINK FENCE \ o \ / ' NIA NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES 6 / \ IN BUILDING SETBACK ~ S 4 °a ° I---~ • : Mq 0 / ° \ ~ / F \ NO PARKING LABEL ~ \ s' ~ ENTRAN ° RICTURE LL rCy SCALES I" = 5O' NIA INTERIOR LANDSCAPING Ex. @. ~ g s / ~ 4N \ ~ C1 \ / ~ ~ \ ~ \ q' zo \ ~ a SIGN 6 "'r S~ 250' LEFT TURN LANE STD BAR (TY s . \ / ~ PI EX. 8' SAN. \ ~q s• Qq ~ \ o r NIA CONCRETE •~ir.:,:...~•~•• \ ~ ~ ~ ` A w PI ° \ ^ ~ 0. J OE r N30o s• P'~ ` • HEFT 4 3 4• I \ ~ \ ~ OE / S \ / \ ~ / ° 4. \ B'Q ~ Q ` DA 100 \ DE ~ 9 ~ EX. SAN MH \ oA . / ~ zo}~ \ \ N!A WETLAND FILL AREA J RIM ~ 36.5+ - a• o ~ ~ p / PI ~ •B°.A \ \ 3 R ~ 10 .o' ° C,9 of PROPOSED DECORATIVE FENCE . Ti~~ • r ~@ C ~ CONSISTING OF 2'x2' MASONRY COLUMNS / LE. = 31.50(SW) or a \t~' ~ \ r LE. = 31.60 (NE,PLUG) PI a ®Q o o s G~' a G~~' R \ ~Y Fq • rya, 6.a. 0 R/~~ WITH ALUMINUM PICKETS BETWEEN COLUMNS. B• \T Or q' ~ ~ ,y~ q qT~ q 1. D ~ SF` ~ ~ 7-7 ~ ~ "F" TYPE CURB TYP. p ' I Oq. s' 6• o q• ~ a ° s ` oa \ ° F C T \ MFNT ~oa~ ~ ~~r ISLAND TO BE IRRIGATED $ CONNECT TO EX. 8" WM 4~ Os LANDSCAPED BY GRAND RESERVE PI ~a. PI M D v B p OA 4' r \ O~A t \ r r , O~i PROPOSED 8" WM EXTENSION EXISTING 6 STORY / 0 ° B r ° 6 ° \ , p51JlIEB PNtl4N0 sro,l 0 18 \ 0 6P 'SIGN 6 ~ o ` ~ nrnE eamY6 ~ I 6x ,/e• twat sBEtY / ` ~ ~~s• ~AR s• \ \ ° ° ° 4' ~ ..,'a o r OFD `u~I 5' CONC. SIDEWALK ~jl am®B,, , OFFICE BUILDING ~s. . ~ q. BI![ BILKGAOUTA ^ / p• Pf IB 14. 0 0 0 OA, E ~ PI q ~ J QO ~ ` PI \ euat BoBpfR PAflK6rG BY I ~ 0 w ~ \ PI \ a lElmis ~ 4 0 \ P ~ \ 3 ~ ~V \ Or S a' o y \ c • ?q, rt ~ oA `unu~ i.. SCgAc Ty 0 oa oa ~ y BUAC BOgOPII ~ ~ G) g. OE ~ OA 9• / \ 0 \ ~ \L O N'141E Wi4(GROUlD FS 81814 16' 0 ~B. / g ~ 0 \ B' (U ~ A \ IB' \ G~ ~ p PI la q T 6' ~a' A 4• P ~ ` e~~ T ApG~ 7 9 8 9' ~ ' 3.4.4' "V V \ c oo b. ' ` 12 ` b .7,a~6'~ CAF 8 4• 9 4' 4` 'S a 4 ( 1!~ P ~ . ~ Al. lE1,EAS ~ / 04 ~ ~ 0 \ 0 V 1•9FAIFS 'C' b ~ pi H' . 9• ~6' \ ` f' {V G ~ 13 ~ ~ ARO °A~~,.'•• ~ a,+.c ~RWgT~R ~ ~ 'p~1N" to A bA _ ~ 4 KEEP RIGHT SIGN a S pis ~o ` ~ ~ / - oUE "ro. N ~6. e ~ PG. I~ X• P p SWIDYm NETilft SOEL PPE ` / 0 PI ' 1 6 ~ 1 A ~ \ PI Y 0 q' ~ f` O ~ 4" \ R a TOP'~SIGN B O l~ ` ' ® a' a a• ° ~ OP BAR ( C N/p 3 4 `mss \ ' j : r,... , o t • / ~ (1~ 8" SAN. ~ PI S TQP •BAR P I " • • P 51 \ V(' R I a;l n; _ B%2'-B' CONCAt1E WBS. Q ~ 0 0 ~ / f ~ G~ \ • I k • - F4B91 TOP oP wss ~.vn. 20" QO ~w , ~ ~ > \ GpSpP -I ~ I . I ~ I NBq A BLIGHT W15E0 YV611 ~ TR, a'S D ` ~_7`/~•v 9 ~ ~ 5' CONC. SIDEWALK ~ _I ~ I I ~ APPfr~41t0.Y ,/z' ABODE ~ Y A ) ~3 I \ 0 n• I n• / 1 0 \ ~ EX. SAN MH PI oA ~ OA s I s' ~ ~C \ RIM = 33. + - (yl~ / P' o ~ PIS MODULAR BLOCK (0 / e.: R I.E. _ 27.52 S) nh P 4• ~ 7 s 2 . I~ S ~ S ~ a' 4 a 5 ~ I ' RETAINING WALL ~ ~ / LE. = 27.62 NE,PLUG) V~( o \oe • B' ` OA °I re VACANT Q'Q. o ~ -~--r~- 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFE P q. ~ 6 ~Q A c~ Ia ~ oa `0` 's~ » '4'" ~a. ~ (p LIGHTING, SIGNAGE AND AVEMENT a \ PI .a 0 PARKING LABEL - MARKINGS FOR PARK PACE BLVD. g• / Q'r \ HANDICAPPED 51CxN DETAIL. . • 8 , P q ~a 6 4 \ • ~ \ T PI ° ° on I EXISTING EXISTING WILL BE DESIGNED A PART OF ~ a• STORMWATER MANAGEMENT THE CONSTRUCTION LAN PROCESS / / ~ ~ Ee' 76' ~ o ~ TOP OF BANK SYSTEM / / ° ~ 0 EX. WETLAND TO BE FILLED 0.70 AC. ° 6 s 6• Iz 1 y7 \ PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED ~ I ~ ` PI \ 0 r \ 3' PARK PLACE 9 / g• OA ~7 ~ o a• I / _ 4__ 9- 9'S" ~ W EXISTING ~ ~ ® 1~ ^I ~ ` ~ o p WEIR ~ TRASH ROOM DAILY TRANSFER o / C 1 ~ ~ _ I ~ 9• g ~ ~ ~ L TRACT I 0 F PHASE I OF SOLID WASTE TO THE PROPOSED 6' H CHAIN LINK FENCE 0 _ P. B ~ F i 9{Q' COMPACTOR LOCATED WEST IN BUILDING SETBACK ; \ 0•// r ' ZI h ~ °A a 4 4' 3 r~ J ~ 9• 0 ~B. , 5- C~ryp o ~ 1 ~ OF PARK PLACE BLVD. WILL ~ q• + ~ oA . I s' ~ ~ J er EX, TOP OF BANK i u BE PREFORMED BY ON-SITE .Q 1 I q• , MAINTENANCE STAFF. / ~ s` PROPOSED SIAMEES CONNECTION AND ~ u ~ 8 \ ~ ~ P a ~ a• o NO' ° 04 59 E J I CHECK VALVES (TYP. / I Is oA s' B 7 r / M 0 + PI ~ PI Or 0 Via' 0 ~ . • ro 23 ~ J o NO PARKING LABEL \ , r s s 6 s. ° 0 ~T ~ ~?6 ~~SF - ,1',____ - 9~ - .~Q' s-%:;:;: ~ z N40° 38' 34"E 4' ~ s N/ D a ~ \ C~1 T 9983 ° 3m I I ~ 0 , q ~ 4' PI \ / ~ O ~ , , P / F ~ e PARK PLACE p ~ ~ B' 6!I~ B' 'T N " i APPROX. ACOE JD LINE ~ ~ I I ~GFJCOA s ~ ~ ~ ADDITIONAL WETLAND BUFFER Z I ~ TRACT II A OF PHASE I P q. . tit 8, _ _ , 0 ' I 0 B / \ ~I 4' 6 on 9• -°~a• ~ / / PROVIDED 525 SF W I I ~0" o I~' o rw I A C I OB. V ` / OA B 6' ~ " . ' / ADDITIONAL WETLAND BUFFER .P ° I I ~ ~ ~ I 0,. / PROVIDED 50q SF `.l p CONCRETE VACANT ~ s' 0 ~ °N A I MEDIAN ~ Q J ~ 1 12 a m. Q ~i I As tl.. n ~ ~ CO 0 1 ~ M' 9" ~..~Q~ 4135 10 .r„ 0 0 1 _ I - REDUCTION IN WETLAND ' "C 2P B' P . ~4 4 ~B. I 4 p w POOL MAINT. DING ? \ ,`,"/,t' ':i~•;'„ ~ / BUFFER 700 SF. I I V x PROPOSED ~ ~i::;'•'~:' o ~ N .J I S MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL m STORMWATER °t ~ ~g, I °B• OA B. ~ / 41 182 ( m ~ gar ' p C7 A MANAGEMENT p ° °E ° • • :3 MATCH EX. PAVEMENT p q. 4 ~ . , FACILITY 400 At~O TTr i~ ~ j , EX, TOP OF BANK I ~ -J I ~ ~ ~ (LOCATION APPROXIMATE) ~ ~ It'j V Q ~ / 15' BUILDING SETBACK is oi~Q ° ~ 0 41 0 " •:~?•••~r'.~•~ a / ~ APPROX. ACOE JD LINE r ~ ; PROPOSED DECORATIVE FENCE b i N I a o PROPOSED 10' SIDEWALK 8 ~ ~ ~ ~s• ~0 ~ (9 I s, TILITY EASEMENT /9i ~ I / ~ CONSISTING OF 2'x2' MASONRY COLUMNS N72 25 38 E ~ H = d Q p I ,o"C ~i O ~ ' r ~ 6' ~ / WITH ALUMINUM PICKETS BETWEEN COLUMNS. ~ I 99 ~ I I j = ~ ' ' PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE TYP. S 9, ~ OAS QJQ P I I 0 rs ID . Z r°I'+ • ° Eli 1 OE O ~ I EX. WETLAND TO BE FILLED 0.54 AC. W ' / / PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED ~ _ . • i I O W ~ 'S ((dd~~ _ry 5' CONC. SIDEWALK / q- (/p( Iz A ~ / DOMESTIC WATER M o©B ~ r/ - ~ I VIN I ~ a I ~ ~ METERS (IIUNIT TYP.) ~ Iz_~~ • 2~ o W ~ ; ° COMPACT CAR PARKING 8 Qq. 6• ~ SO. z t 1 N I I ac ~ ~ 100' LEFT TURN LANE p ° VACANT TACTILE WARNI G STRIP Iz e a _ ~ _ _ _ _ 4pF B FLUSH CURB TYP.) 1 ° ~ I J F- r ~ N p ~ , oA, EXISTWO BERM ~ I TO BE REMOVED ~ x ' ~ ° Q, t ~ ° S , 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER • P 6 ' P 8 wE~caNU ~ S59° 39' ~"E I I 0 ° ; ~ q ryA W ~ ~ I \ FR BUFFER CONSERVATION AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ I I U o ~ ° + ~ 15' BUILDING SETBACK A PI 16' I "NATURAL AREA" 167.8 I a` I I 2.30 AC. I I I O ~ / ~ OA B. 0: I ~ - A W k (Pr~F~F 2V~ITI0N ZONING) ~ I I ~ PI I ~ I ~ \ N a I DECORATIVE FOUNTAIN IN POND (EXISTING) { ~ 1 ~ ~ I ° i ~ c N ~ PROPOSED 6' H CHAIN LINK FENCE / I N ~ 5' CONC. SIDEWALK M p, • u~ f I / ~ \ \ ~ W PEDESTRIAN GATE AT CONC. WALK N uus m / I \ • / ( \ TO HAMPTON ROAD ,f I APPROX. ACOE JD LINE / ` \ ~ ~ z ~ i Pb \ . I / , \ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 1 ~ \ - ~ \ \ ~Q ~ • q ~ .ISLAND TO BE IRRIGATED 8 Fk ~ NDSCAPED BY GRAND RESERVE ~ . ~ ~ \ I- . @•• PROPOSED OUTFACE a \ ~ o \ v \ W STRUCTURE W \ ~ \ \ EXISTING r \ \ \ z ~ J , o ~ ~ Q POSED 8 WM EXTENSION J v \ ~V • PI a. ~4r EX. TOP OF BANK ~ ~ 0 \ \ ` ~ WEIR ~ \ ~ / EX. TOP OF BANK \ ~ \ Z \ ~ , P PI BRICK PAVER MEDIAN \'•r,~ a \ / \ PI IB , w' \ ~ \ ? ? \ APPROX. ACOE JD LINE / J J \ ( ~ m \ \ Q a I o r Z \ \ / \ \ • ~ b I CANT \ ~ W \ 3 \ \ / a \ PI A ~ - / ~ \ ~ e• 4'CONCRETE WALK EXISTING ° \ ~ ~ N \ \ rya 3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ~ / • d \ \ } / \ - SYSTEM - \ \ I r PI 20 PI N / \ \ - ' ' -,G:,/' / ~ ~ EXISTING \ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ / 0 ~ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ~ M, EX- T 6F BANK •y • p - SYSTEM a PARK PLACE \ \ ~ - -.-M- N TRACT I OF PHASE I \ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J N \ ~ P `V 0 ~ V ~ z / > V (n w PI ~ z U FALL z a~. UCTURE z ~ ~ fiH0.TE INLET w ~ Q. . RCA - ~ / / `V z f ~ ~ _ _ x d ~ 0 1 u < S00 19 21 E m ~ ~ _ ' I "E 564 52' ~ ~T 4 CONC.a 'W _ d A L ~ / - a 0 T U ~ ~ r ~c~. i 4 Z~~P~~ _ DEDICATED TO THE CI1 ~ TO THE CITY OF CLEARWATER) DESIGNED THE SIGNATUNE OF THE W1LLRY JOB N0. RWA CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE 5 9-U+- Ub ADDED NANUIGAV AGGt55 Mil GI I Y GUMMtN 15 1180-001-000 DRAWN INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED ICING &jff&1N&&Aff1WG ASSOCIATES .f 0 IN THE GRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLACE PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FOR .ACE FINAL SITE PLAN a 0-16 96 ADDED TURN LANE EATPSTA. I 20+50 P.P BLVD. FEUD ROOK NO. JLWICAD AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS Engineers • Planners Surveyors • Scientists Landscape Architects swr. 2 DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. 24945 U.S. 19 N. 5010 West Kennedy Blvd. EL 8406 Massachusetts Ave. LOT 2 2 9-20-96 REV. PER. DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW. DATF. RWA tearweter, FL. 34623 Suite 200 Suite A-2 LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION I 4-30-96 REV. PER. DRC PREL. SITE PLAN REVIEW SCALE4-10-96 Qc. (813) 791-1441 Tampa, FL. 33609 ow Part Richey, FL. 34653 JJG (813) 282-0111 (813) 846-0904 DATE REVISIONS AB 'D 1"-50' OF 3 N0. F ®i APARTMENTS DREW - 19 PROPOSED LIGHT FlXTURE TO HAVE 90' CUTOFFS 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHOPPING CENTER ADJACENT TO PARKING 260 PROPOSED IGHT FlXTURE TO IIYATER STORAGE HAVE 90• cuTOFFs 0 25 50 _ 100 PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO CONNECT TO I:A ILITY DOMESnc WATER C' NO PARKING LABEL METERS 1 NIT TYP. NO PARKING LABEL N ) PROPOSED FlRE DEPT. CONNECnON EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER PARKING LOT PROPOSED 6' H CHAIN LINK FENCE TACTILE WARNING STRIP AND CHECK VALVES IYP. CAR WASH AREA PEDESTRIAN GAZE SCALE: 1 a = 5O' IN BUIIDING SETBACK ~ FLUSH WRB TYP.) 38x18 CONCRETE 15' BUILDING SETBACK III FLUME 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER CITY OF CLEA~WATER VACANT II b• s' 'F" WRB TYP. p;l ORNNAGE SWALE PI SATEWTE DISH LOCATION RA ~3 ` u2 ~ ~ ao 30 ~ 3~ 3g ~ S`` 34 0 PAR IN LABEL 3 I II k~ Ir p . , „ ~ ~ PI ~ N , " DRAINAGE SWALE 1 93 4s 00 22 28 E S89 54 49 W , - ~ ZS~:33' NO PARKING LABEL CO CT CAR PARK G \`P Is 5•T le 3~ II ' 0 p .4,,.Id,. .I.b......., p r 0' a ~-Ny ' I \ ~ w \ II 50.00 I ~6, PI _ - - - - - s- , • D 17L WALK 0 OA 8~ ~-+1 0 ~s-,a~-a ~j H1`" -+~ywc ~4- \ a ° `~q~ \ I ~ ~ orr. ~ ~ - - - • \ I I s..- a-a•~, _ ~ ~ "M _ D a•---~~ta" ~ le- ~ F ~ ~ 1 ~ EX. 3,v RCP le ~ ° I I 1 0 a'8'S•) 3-a' S• OA • D ~ \ I b• T-" ~'~F'"•t"'~ 6~. I I 3.4 6 33. .W ~ a O~ a' \ ` `Y4r ~ ~16 10'~" p• I~1 I ~ I I I AL OA . b 6.0 0 0 ~ 16. Je U b• ~ 0 Of ~ ~'i 'yn PI - ~ 1 0 4-b y ~ % ~ p ~ 0 Y!- ~ S• 0 b' 0 •.•r.. '7I 9 \ 4-b• OF 6' p• E ~ 6• \ PI 0 r~ 6; 0 \ \ 0A 0 I I I rl a- 6'\ \ \ ` ~ °I~ 111'111 a-s ~ oc 6 oApl S o. ° \ • ° s~~ \ \ ` \ \ oo~~~~AJJJppp;~f} o ° Is I ~ i VOLLEYBALL AREA • ~10' CO Rfi : o % oA " ~ A PI D„(Q/N 6. ~ ~ % 6 0 8.ODf' , A B . b"... b• I0• OA ~,9 \ \ Oa-a. 4 D 4• C . g; n\ 1 6' ® 0 \\6' 0 a• 0 A 0 a~. ~ a' \ °A S \ \ 4 V3 ~ 6 f ` 0~ OE 6 ~ I 1 i I) I ~a ~ o np' " 1 a.r~ \ ® ~ a• \ \ EES 6REMAIN ~ ~ i i ~ II p 0 % 14• Ia r 0 ~ ~ \ OA ~ 4 i ~T ~ - 0 0 ~ p 0 Op- ,a, 7 9 , 0 OA ' A a.~ ~Y" C ~ a DA 0 pp • OF " I 4' 0 p~ \ 0 6q"~ p \ \ 0 11 ®q•~ 0 0 O! 1 OOD • Y T 1GAa. N a 4. l"."Jq~~ OA ~ PRUE ~ ~4'\ \ ~ B~ OA ~ I6 ~ OE I ~ ~ ~ II r PROPOSED 6' H CHAIN UNK FENCE 1B ®6: • ~ b' 4• % .I 8 ° °i ' , F \ b• \ O - 0 1 IN BUILDING SETBACK o D ~gE p - % % Is• ~ s oA b•b 9• b PI 6 \1 s i ~ B p ~ % % .C \ pa. PROPOSED 3 ST©RY ~ ~ ~ 1 ® Qa, a 5• \6. ~ ~ O s• ~ ~ Q~~14 '~~dc\ oA ~ o~' I ~ i i Sp1 25 BUILDING SETBACK o a• o r a \ s' oA 1, u \ m \ s ' le y.5.1 I 1 .III cAZE6 , D ~ 0,. P a• 4 (a : B p6. , DE 26 UNI~4BUILDII~G 0 0 ~ sp ~ ~ 0 a q ~ 4A 4• ~ OS c ~ r 1 ® _ I~1 ff' ' OV T1 ,F' y0" ~ BY\\I OA °A~4- I I I ~ I ~ II TENNIS COURT s 1 s- ° ~ 9 ~ \ oA a• ~6- zo cE p e (6 CAR GAGE 07.E 0 , Pi 6 4 P tP' 4• 0 PI DE \ \ (0~. ~ 4' a 5. ~ \IO" ~ T ~ 6' S" T 0 S \l T ~ A i I ~id II 1 02 ~~J \ ~ ~W~~o % ~ 10 ~ ~ \ ~ I I L?I 4, a. ' s' ~ ^ T @. ~ \ a n r s~ D DE 6. ~ 1z \ ~ pM~ U BLOCK (I I I 111 V ACANT DE 6 - Q• I OA ( T 4• ~a. Q OA ~ 4• ® 0 OA - \ \ `~"4`Y-4' 4• 9 I Q A 0 OA Q . b• 4- 7-b' b6.8 ` % OA 1 47-~ Q b" ~ oa, M' 4 PI 1 1 - ~ 1 0 a R O 6A r ' ® ~ \ a 4~~" q• r~6\ p\OA'I'6, 1 1~ , r~F. r~ WALL(p~p~~ I I I I I `~,~II \ 0 ~ ~ • PI s ~ ~ PO a• 0 % ~a• 6 11 ®a•\ oA ° s s• S Rlp 0 ' P IT 0 tO • 1 " 1 OA 4' 4• W A 6• p a"DE 0 \ dY d1 ~ 2 OA 11 ~.7 1 "C I~ P PI ~ PI 10 Ip % 0 6• 0 ~-~-7-12" \ + b ~1~ ~ 0. ~ ~ OA - 4 DA a. ~ 6 U T B 6 ING OA b• OA' 1 ~ OA b• i V 4 0 0 6 (1 a, y. O ° o ®s'• p~A ` oa ° a \I oAS i 1 BY I I I 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER a ~ a• b % ® 6 . GA AGE) A 6• ~R" OA OE b' ~ O 0 g• 2 3 6 s• 9' OC 0 0 B• 4• 1 \ _ 6" 8• 5.5• \ l~p • ~ I p~4 I I I jII ~A ~ KEEP G SIGN I e• 'POOL OU ' ~ ILDING oA ® o b-^ - D 1 ~a• I 8 0 6a• D(1 % l T ®a. Q 4AA-3- ®a-4' 4 ~ l 0 1 ` a• 1 IQI~ ~ ~ oA ~ o ; I ~ O 5' A~g.T ~ +~e'Wir~1_ e• 0\6",~ oA A 1~ 1~ 6 I ~I I i ~I NO PARKING LABEL ~5'a' s':: I II 15. ~ "WA "b \l"76. 0~~0 1° 1 I ~ , ~ /F I ? ~ I I p Pl b' p Ayf 6'~ ° PUMP ENC SU rp, b % 4 9. 1\ ~ p s.a• 6... 10 LANDSCAPE BUFFER s• PI Q ~i" OA • 9- DE • DA T D s 6 a.. ~ A DE 6"76• OA 'CY13~A)OAk6, \~a ~ 1 16 w I ~ r s ~a p ° Qr ~b- 8 ~ 7 ^ \ OA 5•,. O \ ~4-a• \ o(~i 1 I ~61.z~ ~ gii EDGEbF, PAVEMENT 0 ti. P• I % b ? / p ~t N)• T Y~ S PC OF °.4 -4 0 10, t DE ~ 4 ~ ~ ,A~\ OA Q • D a-~ 6. r ` ' 6- 0 " OA. pA ,1 D` 10'\ 1 + I I~ I ~C ~ / DA 'P ~ - A ~ \5' OA 1 ~ 0 \ ,^4 0 \ ~ 1 \ I 4 V ~ II l~ c 6' 0 6 ~B 4.4'~: V~~ OA \ l p \ 1 OA N ~ b- 0 ~ PI 0 ~ ~ 8•~7 OA YY' 2 {7 ~ ~ ~ 0 J / Pl D - ~ VN.. ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ q 0 A A \ 6' \ 4 ~ \1 ff'~A VOA \ ~ ~E I ? II ~ I o~ Q SCR WALL GOLF CAS' PARKING 7~ °A s• D D ~ Q 4-+-+' 8 t o 11 ~ ~ l ' G S 'I PI 10' L pE °A OA r 0 OA \ 0 DE 0 6' BY t FHA a ' Y7 S Q ~ ~ ED t~1T \ I II SO 11 ~ -1_ PI 4 PI ° ~ . . P a' p 0 D ~ 8• / ~ 4.:i.. A ~6• ~ ~4 4' ~7• 0 "T' 4.6' 0 w• K s `V o- ~ ,~e:.f \1 13 ~ c \ 'G1RE\ " ` \ I O PROPOSED RECYCIJNG AREA p oA s. 9• p 4 s ~~7t}!~~//~ D y4, ,D I~ Q 2 ~ s: D . C `ti ~1' o I 6' 6, , 9 _ A 0 ?G OA 0, e. •.i'•. p 8' ~4' 0 OA ~ ~ ~4 0 STGP SI 1° ~ 6• 4C DE 14 g1 ~ ^ \ D \ 0 T OE I ~ 0 ~V' OA B' ~ ~ 10' I 0~ n LOA 1 4 '~""lJhJ46` "JJa. c \ \ • I I II I 0 ~ ~ O 0 C, 6. •t,},... ~7. 4.44.6• J DE 4 = 9' Q ~ ;:t~•. ,•a• ~ a A ;i r.~; PROPOSED RETAI I G I4` L T ~ 3 A I 6• D G ~J I,,. ®6, 1(IYb b. OA ?6,y `a 66p,,,,.~!^r~ l \ I I ~ I ? (o~ a~\ ~ s PI PM I • o a a ~6Q ~ ; eDEa a,1 ) s• ~o~Y I I n n>• PI pf ~I.. 04 a} PI w •N t OA ALL BULKH rl • 12' r' 4 q. 4 rl I I a0A YI ~ a, •7,. ~ ' 6-s `A 6 ly OA `f~.i" OAS 81B6~~`~, PRO \ ; ~1 I 3. I ~ ,I .b j OA~~W :.+.~,.y'a:'! . PIZ PI B! DE rn P ~ I 0 a• 0 4' ~ PI 0 p .N b, op. DE Vl-1 0 0 I 0 ~0~ I PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR (y ~4. p J ,.a.yr.,,.,' p• oA VI7 PI ~ ~ i 4' OA a, OA a'a' r ~ 9' • \V OA a• - ,QR~ ' ~ 1 ~ \ ~I ° ~~1zw ~ 6' 0 °A~ ~~4A' ~'N` A 1 ®y \ DE g\ CAA~~`~pp~\ DE I ? ~ 11 I i I (~II.` tl7 SCREENED PER CIN CODE •••A ; ' Qs' U o - ~ ; ' ~ OE - DE ~ ~ p r I o b .,fir PI ~ 16" ~ . .8531 R v9 t ro ~r PI ~ PI 0 b' .~(A b l7 r~I,~W~ t 6)• y ~ • \ OAT 6. ~g" \ \ li. OA `~4'\ (y5. 6 ? ~ ~ I "~,~1~ Q ~ G'~ ~ PI ~ p ? :S".. 12, 44 I1 E ®I ~~µU'~ ,~~„a~ C C 0 '.h'4 ' .j 9• 0~ DTI Q ~1. a? V .Ip• P I ~ i 8^ p PI 4, T DE ~ . 1' • I f? 0t€,zW © 6 \ p \ ' ` • ~o ~ M i~ l I I ~ '\~,I 0 I x I ~"S;`A~4V ~8.'a OE \1 E T 6' nl \ ~ ..,.4-4`: ~ 4 5' 4- \ ~~yy^ry OA ~ ©~t~~Tf,~i ~ ! I I i II ~ r r c DA • ? 9• I N J C I N JQy.6~,°YF • OA \ 0 ~"7 0 \ ~ ~ ` D l~,"~~6. DA 0• a ~6• L s• OE ~G I p 1 i~~ I w I ~MM,~^^ C7 54` g. D - A ( D~ ~\va ®q.17 ~ r ~~~~"II ~ I II W I VO 4 PI PI PI 0 I~PL' iav W b• ~ q. p I A I r"~~ 10 LANDSCAPE I t. r a ~ s.O o DECORATIVE FOUNTAIN IN ~ OE o M BUFFER GATE ° s b PI Q b. Qlr ^ s• 0 4-a # I m~ r .:',r•.rr: , ~ . 1" 4 s• ~ ' a• to 1 M W V ® ~ \ O A OA I ' O ~ l ~ OA P B ®q OE Y OD ~ A l"7 0 01 i I (I I \ II Q 6R~ y ~ I 0 5 \ OA P ®6.OA P 6' ~ I 1 I! I ~I ~ I I ~/~1 ON SITE" ICK 9 $ - D ~ :'Y'•: Q s• p' Is" ~T . Dr g' -s' ~ I BN .6: PROPOSED DE DA 3 ~ Q Y ~ r ~ g" OAC T ~ O ~ 6 6 4.8- OE ,9' OA o 1 4 11 l 1 I II ~ I I 0 Q' PAVER ROADWAY ` ~ PI s , ';,i.:.,.`•'j.: • PI 6. oGil r PI 16" Qb4• b. DE 1 LIMITS AND D - ~ a p , D Sfi0 WATER MANAGEMENT ~ D o A p ~ Q ~ 24 PI • ' ^t 4' ~ ~ OA ~s.7-T 6• 4' - f r~ Q O ~ ~ • 6^ \ p -a. O _ ~ 9' ®1 I 1 1 1 (I I I II I "py.~~~~ U °i o~ ~ BY a• ~ \o~a 6 T ~ I ~ ~ ~ a. }.~z e• ° , , si i i } it E . B" SAN Q BED ~ i b' Qq• I~' D 0 a. ~ , 4-4 AT A DATE I 4' o DA ~a. oa SYSTEM ~ OO D Qa-a-a. ff~~''~~ ®6. 1 F f'Y'.~~4' ~6• J IY \ ° a-4 YJ 8" \ s 'd{y'1 \ ~ OE I~ I ~ I p~A V ° a•\ 1 a _8 0, 4 VVJ ? 1 1 I6 1 ~ ~s• Da - Q ~ - r DE ray , o Q ~ ~a. •KR PI Qa-q ' J DE . 0 S~a' ~ 0 OA OA • Q' 15 BUILDING pl P p p T a a,~ - Q~1(~/ oN 4 - l1 a Y,,~ OA ~ ; OP 0~ \ OA `N \ 0~ °A JA ? I I ~ 1 II °03-3-4 (ISA 6• ~ G : ~ `A~ r` ~ q• OA Oi Q ~ 6. 0 6. 0 a• a• OA \~I. ~ 19' ~I\I I II r A 9 0 D b` c, CJ .a ~JIOi I PI ` ° ~ 34•q-b 4 ~ D 0 - SETBACK 52'R r 4• % p 44.4.4• rD~ ~ r PI 4 } ~b- P - OA 2-b-4- 0 Ua. PI / 3- ' OA ~6" ~ oA ° a• ~ A r ~ ~ CURB TYP. E N 7 ~ F I • WRITY GA 1 pa • ~ PI PI PI ~~®6 29-4-4• 6 ~ ~ b4 p 14• 5 O6• ' ~ pA BY a\ 0 - `-'B" 5' 5.71 1 ~1``~ V &6• I d .O AS ~ M 5. OA D DA O 0 1 II I~ I E~ 4 OF ~O 9p' 0 \ I PI 10' A 9' 10' l.~ A ` P ~ ~ ~ A PI 9 S! D 0 ~~4• .6' T O OA / 2 6 DA a f0' '~'V7 , b• PI ~ ~ PI8 " t DE 0`~A 0• 1 4 b• 6 oa °~a-ass" l.Tq 1 1 ~ ~ ~ _ e Q' \ 4^ ° a• t 1 `p/ ~ II TRAFF1C CONTROL ~OX ~ - I 20• A s• s• PROPOSED OUTFACE Q ~ OA a, o A \ / ~ . 6" h p ~ 0 4 b 6•^ A 4-T 0 0 4 ~p- STRUCTURE Ib" O~" 4-b• . I.` p 0 3 t~. a a. R ~q• O fl e C 6• A h T° rn l / rnl ,°%6 _ g3 as \ ~ 0 0 PI /~~/V 417xffi' PI ~ ~ 6' DEAD ` J s 4' _ _ _ ~q coNC. 7RA~IC uc~r °O s•. " ~ - VV YY__ _ -V.L1~ - - ~ POST I PROP. OUIFALL STRUCTURE s p P oA o b Q, A, 4. % 0 s' \ PI s 4 C /y~ , `T s-r ~~oA • ®ro, p• o o "s PROPOSED WALL \ 10' OA ~/1 v OA 4 . % a• PI DID 4• A , Z~ 1`- C9 x X. PAVING - - naDBFR~IT YSETBACI( ~E , 8" WM ~Q~' ~ S44'S6'11 "E ~ ~ ~ ON ARD _ EASEMENT \ I b- Qs• ~ 4' j . \ T\ , ,iD•~, S~ p R / NO P RKING LABEL ' v RZ_ ~ 35.36' I PROPOSED 10 SIDEWALK ~ ; ' 's' 0 g o o r % ~ / do UiIUTY EASEMENT '4 N^ J- 0 ~ , ~ ~ ~ S I ~ - g PROPOSED DECORATIVE AVENUE / 25 BUILDING SETBACK ~ D s o p B o 4• l P ' a. OA ~ v ~ ~ EX, 8" SAN X PEDESTRIAN GATE PROJECT SIGN PI V'y 0 Q 1 ~ / / / AND FRONT YARD p gyp, d r3' o Qa b. `D ~QR oQ ~ / / ,fig P~• x _ _ _ W SIDEWALK CONNEC110N ~ \ z b. ~ , s p 4444-°' / / ~ _ 4 • NG % PROPOSED BRICK WALL ~ ~ ' • Zr` r >p Qa. 6. oROP BVI yy~ Pl ~ ~ / 0V / / ' / ~N P$. ' W I / - _ -'--~_..E IDEWALK 4'6' © 2 4.12' 1 ~ ~j'4+~~~ / / / ~v TRANCE FEATURE ~ ~ < 4• / ~ P iii i.~ 1~0~-6" MAX. HEIGHT \ ° p A p oA PI ~ SCP / h ~ r r o 6 'F" 8 5 OT ~ / ~ V"' G DE ` / Q iP P ~ ~ ~I~~1 ~1 I EX. SAN MH pL WE'R1WD TO BE FlLLED 0.10 AC. ~ i i ~ y' ~ r - RIM = 43.90 STRUCTUREOL ~ II C'7 P,B, Prp 1 4. ~4sas• o ~ j / ~i , / / / 9 ` 5' U 4' ~4' 4' / ~O % % / CIA- \ ~ D 0, 4-b' / / % / ~ % ~ ~ 1 1 I.E = 32,46 (E) PREVOUSLY PERMITTED ~ ~ ~ ~ BUS SHELTER ~ i I.E. = 30.67 ) II ' I 0~ a 6 7~ PI I / a'~ / ~~(r / / ~'iGl~ F 3 a. ~3.4 o o• siE / / / .d COMPACT CAR PARKING ~ I' i LE. = 30.61 N) EXISTING ~ ~ II _ ~ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT II F" CURB TYP. ~ 6 0 BY DE ~ OQA - ~4. n/I'/ eP / / O\ / / I 2 ~ a 4 D : si / Ir ~ / / / , EX. WETLAND TI EX. WETLAND TO BE FILLED 0.11 AC. ; ¢ I SYSTEM II S' 3 P RAG b• aa• ' / , 0~~' / PREVIOUSLY PEI PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED I= ' ~ II I "~r DE ' x;11, cc PI / / / / p ~P UA OA 34' / ~ / / / / 1 C~ D 0 / ' ~ o O . 4 ~ , y'j~/ / ~ ~ PEDESTRIAN GATE JV GATE i ~ i I a• \ ~a G~// / / ~ ~P~~ SIDEWALK CONNECnON CONNECTION x I W i \ - 7 / / / i ~ y~~i o ,~~-a-s .~j / ~ / NO PARKING LABEL I 1 IG LABEL I I ~ ! I NO PARKING LABEL ~ 9' le ° 7 s" b' DA ~ / •,.r / / ~ % / / / ~ DY A ~4' / / i ~ % / I ! II a' 3 4' .3 , 7~ / ~ ~ / / ~j 1 I 1 I Z ~ p~ T b• DAN 0. D 6~^% AP~ ~~R~P~ ! I I I _ ~ PROPOSED LIGHT FlXTURE TYP. e!/ 4• D ~ , ~ \ ~ / / d ~0 r -------'----------1 I I I I I f-~.. ; I I ~ \ i I ~ ~ TREE LEGEND F- ~ ~tJ~ / ~ ' Y ; 3 EXISTING OSPREY NEST ~ ,h,~ \ y NG - PAVING SYMBOL DESCRIPTION F TO BE RELOCATED ~1 1 ~ eP ~ ~_~TURE PAV? SPEED HUMP y CY e 0 1~ y Q o _ - ITURE i 1 I ~ ~ BAY ~ PROPOSED DECORATIVE FENCE E~ 1 ~ I 'G i ~ CHINA BERRY I I I 1 3 CONSISTING OF 2x2' MASONRY COLUMNS ° W WITH ALUMINUM PICKET'S BETWEEN COLUMNS. Z ; ~ - I~ J F FA ~ CITRUS 40-0 O.C. Nt~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ o SEE SITEPLAN FOR SPACING NO PARKING LABEL ti C q DE DEAD rc T \ 1 1 o O ~ i l.- hti~ ® MYRTLE 0 oAK w ~ ,S D: rc 30' 6'-O" O.C. 30' ~ " RGP F ~\1 0 .PALM o 2k 1 f ~ ~ , MAX. MAX. T• J+ I 1 ~ ' ~ ~ PINE \ W E ~ ~ ~ / / tic ~ ~ , ~ ' p" UNKNOWN w / ~ q ~ i m / F _ ~ 9y 4 \1\ \ ` Z ~ J / / 2C . ~ \ 1 1 1 r ~ ~ Q / ~ ~ ~ \ \ \ 1 \ \ g W ~ / \ 1 \ 1 1 t a~ Y ~ W / / w. U Y / / 1 1 HANpICAppQp 9dl i ~9E IIIOEif 60.111 Z1n ~ ~ U / r I m / / V I 1 1 1 1 Z ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ I 4----? 1 CO6C. M7Lf IWP OONN COXG WAI6 a ~ \ ~ SEE B?DEk N0.10i r--~' Z ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ' ~ o f ~ ~I I Z ~ \ 1 - 2"X 2" ALUM. POST EMBEDDED 60" MIN. HIGH ALUMINUM GATE W INTO 8" w X 12" D CONCRETE W! PICKETS @ 4" O.C. ~ I , I I I a POURED FOOTING 0 6'-0" O.C. o MAX. N N I I I b I a L_J L' ~ J FUNRE ~ B' I ~ Z I I BUILDING I I . W i 1 NOTE: Z I EXISTING w sce~ ~~x'.i'-o I LOT 1 ~ All pOVemeOt markings to ba thartnopiasda I BUILDING STORE Z Y I STORt OPHTHALMICS~ INC. x'"'"`"" m PARK PLACE = CURVE ~ RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING DELTA } Ct 610.00 36.51 18.26 36.50 SOi'46 42 W 03'2546 N~4NbfC~4PP~1~ STAILL 1~~T,41L a C2 690.00 388.40 199.49 383.29 S12'37 58 E 32"15 O6 0 C3 285A0 292.94 160.89 280.21 S00'4114 W 58'53 31 0 DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE WAUTY RWA CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE DRAWN INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED KIANG AFANGIANEERIANG ASSOCIArES INw PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED 9 THEGRAND RESERVE AT PARK PLA( K PLACE s 9-05-06 ADDED HANDICAP ACCESS PER CITY COMMENTS 1180-001-000 JLW CAD AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS Engineers - Planners Surveyors - Scientists - FOR Landscape Architects FINAL SITE PLAN MOVED BOOK NO. 3 10-16-96 MOVED BRICK COLUMN OUT OF EX. UTILITY ESMT SHT 3 CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. DEL AMERICAN PROPERTIES 24945 U.S. 19 N. 5010 West Kennedy Blvd. 8406 Massachusetts Ave. DATE, RWA learwater, FL. 34623 Suite 200 Suite A-2 & LECESSE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOT 3 2 9-20-96 REV. PER. DRC COMMENTS & ADDED PARKING LOT IATIOfd 1 4-30-96 REV. PER. UN DRC SITE PLAN REVIEW Sc~4-10-96 G.C. (813) 791-1441 Tampa, FL. 33609 ew Port Richey, FL. 34653 JJG (813) 282-0111 (813) 846-0904 NO. DATE REVISIONS ArrD 1"=50' OF 3 BY