The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2006-02005Planning Departm R T RE NTE ASE #: o - Ckarwater 100 South Myrtle 'ir ATE RECEIVED: Clearwater, Florida FEB CEIVED BY (staff initials): U Telephone: 727-56 B 2 3 20 TLAS PAGE #: Fax: 727-562-486 ONING DISTRICT: PIANNIN L)EVEI 0)'lviFNTSVC LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICA ?•( ?A+. ?F PROPERTIES: ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including NORTH: 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SOUTH: WEST: ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION' Residential Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (C/ode Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: K e Iro-l S5Q1) C e Oil Ls C MAILING ADDRESS: /6 0. 5/GI `p- 1 ta( Gad ZW 8 CA c 33 76 7 PHONE NUMBER: -727- 41 I g37'7 FAX NUMBER: 7,2 7 - 14 7- 6 '617 PROPERTY OWNER(S): 02 t /O ?G'LAA (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: 1L O 6l 1 V? G f Z 1u MAILING ADDRESS: Qo2 G? 76 - Nam 0 on )CI, 3 3 PHONE NUMBER: -7 a? ?' ?7 3 V,^7 / FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: ?t9.t--7//'4,J E-MAILADDRESS: tQQon,k1 padbald/.rr. . Cow B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) ` `/ P ?O D STREET ADDRESS of subject site: e? 7 S l' 1 C If. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SCie- R Ap r© y i2 41 S , ?e P /A wS (if not listed here please note the location of this documen in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 33 T$- IG -' OOO?©_ 32o°0oCa0 PARCEL SIZE: aO (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 1/3 S : ,u L. F4,n?' C orb (number of dwelling uni s, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use), DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): T 0 CO N S t r,,e- !k '(o T-.411 S U ? ji y : 5 r O ?J b tJ ???° /? KJ t} ?( Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) r 4 r c. dte eke P?nPcf, r&N ` %0 fye-NJ/!@7J 13 a6- i v©* Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. r -/. -, ?r p30' / T'?a pcopsj Ioe(opma +` s `e> All -a G' 4?,Qk JAI( A loti tke KrAu?deo 1Zk Q©AA 'Iprot-1'T& -? i( o? rIArfreosoos(y P,oiPro.?e(d (ZeNAtSsgelGta??gS?lil`.?ts,ot•1??e?ees tN. 1 WA((S Artt)ro'c.N( ivl1Provm ? Jhar 9eOHrAtt;wa re-S ceCafini uscg Groot rnA',i.+ ro741 4 Audis ; +s k«e =Ns w +tL• e 6 sT; o+qa r preaPosel Jeuelofw,eats A44o.p 'rke Lae-10PACPAt PArc.e(. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the valy?a thereof. Tie ro oscd G' w1Al( vof o? it`s A_Q?fr,°tTe- Jeue(oP?&w't' ,tj tke Are-A AoJ s"pporl=s rkc- VA?vffe AeJe(®?en?ru?s QA,jAceur .sses A JAr:nty o ? J d . re-s", ea?C;A( Aid A C?urc-L? use 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. f( + (f i -me- l eAIEk AJd SA t,4 o??ersoN5 ee- 5 Aat1 work'.vq '•w tl.? N?`?skLoA. J i 5 ewkA by Qrovii'll"t A'J*. UAJ Sc.reew b<ttJaeo tke rckt;Oely {1,g? `CrAJ4;C- Jo(om,- ASA res;de.J't1a( uses, I'miLI:v r; acr 1SZPrv?r6oa?. Q agree o .?vrh( u:?Lq s Prou:ded by Gl,e wAl(t Skteldiluj? rl.S,04p/ r& 4't %&VKe- ©>j- ck? 4. The proposed dgvelopTenrt is designed to minimize tra ocongestion. ?e )rots®S?A?UAII does ??o??iA+F to a((? tv trn>??? Goa?9?5?Toay, lou?C e'?n???/ Ad td .wiProved ll??'c(((e rneueaae?u1 by Sc reelv;?5 dr:.ser$ ?rro?l trAc.'C,-o oL- 1% e- Aa 0- r e de?,?iA( PArcS.IS 5. The¢ proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel (proposed for development. AS s`N`CJ 161 I rlrJa al ADooe- `??? 'IOKVAC.J IAtG ?'c:ai ',Ty A\So °Al 1idollG5 A tJArjI?tii o? reSiLot. AI d*tue'o??reM' s Tke ?Iosrrd wAl ( 4 s Typ;co3 ( ? v ??er5 Cfre-- A? those At-eA +res?d?c??t:el s?bd:u?s;oi?s. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, L on adjacent properties. ur4 CS°? ope-rAt%®w Rrc- p//&'t t'e(tsJ.ai.,? ro rk, Qrof+ose J.N. rl,e w„(( MCAS? V'6v ?( ° *keAC-t-s Awl oJors 'CrAA3%fe'rr: w+4 from tke- k-,oAl r :tk?O? w, r® rt Is&C.e.wlt CeS.?cLit, A? U:Se's ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 2 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 of 1- Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater I-1 Am ? Provide complete responses to the seven V( RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA- Exp aui how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. f r ` 'Clla me-M1 IoO-4. c-:c??U-ac W'%-J" 140A t?1? le N -IN. AclIc:uci of A Q WA ?u fe-'- heZe.?aeiu / ' rr o Ert Le west '%06-iteASe. Tit: '??/te1JSi17 ai- INS?? c9r t?c rev:o?gl A roue ' e o YA. 50iu'?S;ot9} twet' Tke- FLav,i e S A J for e.+e o pmenrr cr?t 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) S%rr- APC sisP?larT?d b?/ tke prc,?®Sc? F61,r. MArIl ct UA(,Ic o1 ?r6peat?e5 TI,Nt ALut rt...- r wAI( Le-skus tltase- A-C t iyn' s`.tcs Ate S,,M % (o4rIy aevC1OLoe?, ?Aut pc.???>r? s,w???il?t^ e>{eUe.(e> r?tetu'tS or kA%J c 0--1"pwt; G e- -5'z,,,k uSoS? 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. e ? ? V KIph5tro, Process -Pr ;o?? o? G' 6co1-?cr wA(IS Are A16w ` ixe- Go?>Stroct t( ( ( f cy.M OeiJS'L- 1 erocsS TOr ? ? c'sCl a I?GSIAe??tiA(Propertit'3 Q/J0 1fJ1 L ? D?NSst? QI1A I,L{1.1G '?OMeTRr f1 l? q ? i r + ?CS.d?,.,t?nl Pro CPC?cS• '.s L e-oed a PIGY-?71G i)e-ie-(& a,,tx Res:Aeptld A141 KeJ',off Plc L Vev,,.t °l M rev;evi r S kppr&priAte 06^ c apo5c w*( t pr&tGctiLj oajtGrr 'r. d?- CvrrGlut AN uZ?JJ`G 1'eSi?eutS• 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. es aWouad by FL.sgow T?•e. !pro Re-Se? Gt TAI( ukt( do.a per AlterrltL ras.dc#j*C#w( %j s ( ©'1oK? 'C? g? nth tie ?Ga..nr:_,••S:'??r ReS;?v?`A1 de_ye(©Par?evt StAladn?rdS. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for yfevelopment. jj / / / T?t @r©po.ed L` wc4+? i s Av up?rAaL ro CMe?rc?J'oc?sly ?4DAroyc? Sy?d?.sts?oN, Prou"Jo l A u'1SUa( A1.1d aP 1.t" l crA?.?o N {?y 1; r`C et .c res?deulrs `?+?tp 1'.c.? , r?s .?.v 4 sw?r? .ae? t u cr AL?rw( ?o ? (f r } / I l y - }} I y - ? - 1 ?? 1 ? ? ? ? ? ? 'C ` ? e?JC(o N'rGwl.S i.a ;s?1t '?t s AmJ nPd eS`A17 Al re s,C?c0.1l. t;ax?At.sA Mec`:p/' l, rAc ;Y e(r:uer 'CLne. >;oMNnz ors c ViL.ro.a0t? 5 s.ue r?s•c= Sew erc ? ?.? 14rwR ?r• • 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the pa Gel prpgosed for development and the City of Clearwater as a who e. t eW AWC-eg Tkc cGlxaLVaa;C? cNArpcter TI1e. rropost'? III* ao ©-f ?kc G` 61.,f--e-r UJ All jf MACe-I1, u A dcve do wterut 5 CAillArd GsZA 1a ??s ?e? b orI1Gr re5 o1erv?:++? l?SeS to ?6?c. iwt?v?c?=.ltt Area RR',a, Fo?? ?:9F?r wAIIs oF?er ? vGre:AScd s?.relvity for ?'t5 c deuZ;a !ue tspme.•??s . 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicini?Y of th parc I proposed fort development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. jlne ra d J 4 1- -Ter wAII dee5 IJo'C 'art Ac"C I6C W.A-M $G'r?av1c.?C (`e cJfre rr?e?TSj L-, Vrs of off- Strect Ark:v rG u?rcmcw??s, ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 2 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exam to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ORIGINAL ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): RECEIVED _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; p C Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; FEB 2 3 20011 Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; CITY OF CLEARWATER All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and - Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ORIGINAL ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; RECEIVED ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: FEB 2 2000 _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; PLANNING DEPARTMENT Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; CITY OF CLEARWATER Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); - Structural overhangs; - Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; - Proposed and required parking spaces; - Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); - Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; _ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN Su3MITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-M" A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ORIGINAL ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). RECEIVED ? Reduced signage proposal (8 % X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) CITY OF CLEARWATER ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. d-- Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. NONALD M. AUGUSTINE MY COMMISSION # DO 409645 L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City represVntatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. ignatireLe3ef property owner or representative @ hm-(in STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swor to and subscribed before Rig' this /I I:s day of A. D. 200 % to me and/or by o is personally know as pro uced as "fcatio? C m=,? Notary public, My commission expires (? _ 9 ?'?- Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater AFFIDAVIT TO AUT?OFtIZE AGENT: L (L (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2. That this property constitutes( the property for which a( request for a: (describe request) f 1 ?nA f Co rv std u???' a o f A S u Cf . v; S, o w A Q R N d Ct Rt7 c /? t o si en, c 1??:1 1 (e ui 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: " Z. e-- as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. e ORIGINAL RECEIVED 15ropertyO'ChMer FEB 2 3 2006 Property Owner PLANNING DEPARTMENT Property Owner CITY OF CLEARWATER Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS fo? re,me the undersi nedn officer duly commissione by the laws oft !ate of Florida, on this day of B + personally appeared who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/ he si ned. RONALD M. AUGUSTINE Notary Pu MY COMMISSION # DD 409645 My Commission Expires: EXPIRES: July 16, 2009 S:IPlanning DepartmentOpplication Formsidevelopment reviewiflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Application 2005- City of Clearwater S?'ta Receipt #: 1200600000000001944 Date: 02/23/2006 r Line Items: 2/23/2006 3:53:13PM Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2006-02005 04 Flexible Residential (SFR) Payments: 010-341262 Line Item Total: 200.00 $200.00 Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid It_ Check MAGNUM HOMES INC R -D 2071 In Person Payment Total: 200.00 40 ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 2 3 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. . This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 $200.00 cReceipt.rpt • E FLD2006-02005 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Date Received: 02/23/2006 RENAISSANCE OAKS, LLC ZONING DISTRICT: LDR LAND USE: RS ATLAS PAGE: 245A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED ORIGINAL RECEIVED FEB 23 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CLW CoverSheet • _ r w r? y , , _ ;yam; 0 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIFW May 16, 2006 Mr. Ron Letize 1928 Valencia Way Clearwater, FL 33764 • CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CI.FARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVF.NUI,, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Re: Development Order for case number: FLD2006-02005 - 2275 McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Letize: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On May 16, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall residential subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-104.D. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following finding of fact and conclusions of law and conditions. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. The 20.07 acre subject property is located within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District; 2. The proposal is consistent and compatible with other fences in the area with regards to material, scale and location and is architecturally compatible with existing walls in the immediate vicinity; 3. Applicant seeks relief from maximum wall/fence height limitation under Code provisions of Section 3- 804.A; 4. Proposed landscaping, use of stucco over masonry construction and wrought iron entry gates mitigate the height of the wall; 5. The wall will have no adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood; 6. The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion and is well outside any required sight visibility triangles; 7. The signage is creative, simple, and will contribute to the overall character of a place; 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this property; 9. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Project criterion; per Section 2-104.1); 10. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 11. Based on the above findings and.proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. Conditions of Approval: 1. The final design and color of the wall and sign be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BiLI. JONsON, Vic;. MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL MBIBIT HOYr HAMIIAON, COUNCILMEMBIT ® CARLBN A. Ph'n•atsi•:N, Cot Nn Lau•:w;lai "I;QUAI, EMPLOYMENT AND AI'FIRMATM: AC•I'ION EMPLOYER" Page 2 • May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02005 2. Show the canopies of all trees to remain on the plan sheets prior to the issuance of the fence permit. The general rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH); 3. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture, prior to the issuance of the fence permit; and 4. The landscaping be installed and maintained according to the plan approved or modified by the Community Development Board. Pursuant to Section 4407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by May 16, 2007). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodtler, Planner H at (727) 562-4547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director SA\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Inactive or Finished Applications\McMullen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVS\FLD2006-02005 Development Order.doc 0 0 J-V5 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, May 16, 2006, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Windward Passage Condo LLC is requesting Flexible Development approval in the High Density Residential District to reduce the rear (north) setback from 15 ft to 3 ft (to pool deck - where a 13-ft rear pool deck setback was previously approved) for a previously approved attached dwelling project (FLD2003-11059, approved by the CDB on May 18, 2004), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-504.F. (Proposed Use: Revised pool deck location for a 55-unit attached dwelling project) at 202 Windward Passage, Island Estates of Clearwater Unit 5, Blk D, Lots 10-13 and Part of Lot 9 & Tract. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2006-03012 2. Senior Citizens Services (James Holt-The Clarkson Group) are requesting Flexible Development request to construct 115 overnight accommodation units within the Downtown (D) District pursuant to Sec 2-903 of the Community Development Code, and to allow 4 parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along South Prospect and Ewing Aves. (Proposed Use: Overnight Accommodations) at 940 Court St, Coachman Heights Rev, Blk C, Lots 1, 11-12 & S '/s of Vac Haven St on N & Pt of Lots 2, 3, & 13. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2006-02010 3. Clearwater Neighborhood Housing Svc Inc is requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a single family home in the Medium Density Residential District with a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 20 ft (to building), as a Residential Infill Project, per Sec 2- 304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1220 Pennsylvania Ave, Palm Park, Blk C, Lot 8. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner Il. FLD2006-02004 4 Renaissance Oaks LLC (Gus Di Giovanni) are requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a 6 ft tall residential subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Rd, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Sec 2-104.D. (Proposed Use: 43 Detached Dwellings) at 2275 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec 33-28-16, M&B 32.02. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner II. FLD20066-02005 5. Church of Scientology Flag Svc Org Inc and Arnold Brown Properties are requesting Flexible Development request for a mixed-use development consisting of 156 attached dwelling units, 63 overnight accommodation (hotel) units with ancillary facilities, 1,360 sq ft of retail floor area, and 17,660 sq ft of indoor recreation/entertainment facility (museum) floor area within the Downtown (D) District as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C of the Community Development Code. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (Attached Dwellings, Overnight Accommodations, Indoor Recreation/Entertainment Facility, and Retail Sales and Services)] at 121 N Osceola Ave, and 118 N Ft Harrison Ave, Sec 16-29-15, M&B 12.01, 12.04 & 12.06. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-09103 F ?Y FAX NO. : 7275365271 40apr. 11 2006 01: 35PM P1 Renaissance Oaks, LLC FLD2006-02005-2275 McMullen Booth April 11, 2006 To: D. Scott Rice Land Development Engineering Manager City of Clearwater Fax: 727-562-4755 The gates on the entry side will be operated by remote controls and they will swing in, away from the entering vehicles- The gates on the exit side will open automatically and will swing out, away from the exiting vehicles. There will also be a Knox key box entry to accommodate fire and emergency vehicles. There will be a call panel where guests of residents will be able to contact residents who will then be able to allow entry from their residences. Ve ry truly, lk-? J-- Ronald Letize Agent Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: K o_n ?--?? FAX: 444 -2 - G 1 .4.. Phone: FROM: c ? Z7 k" S Phone: DATE: O ?' CD SUBJECT: s 1'ln [I I 2UU? MESSAGE: A NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 9 fa ' • Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 9:39 AM To: 'ronal@tampabay.rr.com' Subject: FW: FLD2006-02005 - 2275 McMullen Booth Ron, I need to obtain a response to Traffic Engineering's comment listed below before the end of today, Tuesday, April 11, 2006. John Schodtler john.schodtler@myclearwater.com No response was provided to Traffic Comment #3: Describe how the gate operates. 4/11/06 - NO RESPONSE At DRC a transmittal letter was requested to provide responses to conditions. Letter not received. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com <mailto:scott.rice@MyClearwater.com> t Apr. 11 2006 08:49AN YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94476847 Apr.11 08:48AM 01'04 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THBJ SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-73291. 0 0 Page 1 of 2 Schodtler, John From: Patricia Stough [parch@gate.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:38 AM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Re: Entry rendering Renaissance Oaks THANK YOU! WILL DO... JUST HAD TO ASK! Patti Patti the Architect, Inc 1634 San Roy Drive Dunedin, FI 34698 (727)733-3769 On Apr 4, 2006, at 9:27 AM, <John. Schodtler@myClearwater.corn> wrote: This was previously discussed with Ron Letize and Neil Thompson, Development Review Manager and was determined to be unacceptable. The entry sign is limited to 24 square feet and six feet in height; the columns and gate are limited to six feet in height. John Schodtler -----Original Message----- From: Patricia Stough [maiIto: parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 6:06 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Entry rendering Renaissance Oaks Hi John... Please let me know if this will fly... 4/4/2006 This was previously discussed with Ron Letize and Neil Thompson, Development Review Manager and was determined to be unacceptable. The entry sign is limited to 24 square feet and six feet in height; the columns and gate are limited to six feet in height. , John Schodtler -----Original Message----- From: Patricia Stough [mailto:parch@gate.net] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 6:06 PM To: Schodtler, John Subject: Entry rendering Renaissance Oaks Hi John... Please let me know if this will fly... Page 1 of 1 A A L file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\john.schodtler\Local%20Settings\Temporary%20Internet%20Files\OLK2\03-21 %20Re... 4/4/2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 March 27, 2006 RONALD LETIZE 1928 VALENCIA WAY CLEARWATER, FL 33764 RE: FLS2005-12103 LOCATED AT - 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Dear : RONALD LETIZE The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-12103 . These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing responses to the comments for the upcoming DRC Meeting on: Thursday, March 30, 2006 Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, Jo Schodtler, Planner II cc: File DRC Pre-DRC Comments Mail Out t Conditions Associated With FLD2006-02005 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD ..,,TON Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4773 03/17/2006 Call "Sunshine", 800-432-4770, for utility locates prior to excavation for wall foundations. Not Met Environmental Condition Heather Faessle 562-4897 03/14/2006 No Issues Not Met Fire Condition Leonard Rickard 562-4327 x3062 03/21/2006 Must install A Knox Key switch for gates in accordince with Pinellas County Ordinance. Not Met Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 02/28/2006 Provide 15 copies of the landscape plan for the area around the proposed subdivision entry wall. Not Met Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 03/17/2006 Provide the location of the existing trees adjacent to the proposed wall on the site plan prior to Not Met CDB. 03/17/2006 Additional comments may be forthcoming once this data is received and reviewed. Not Met Storm Water Condition Bob Maran 562-4592 03/13/2006 No Issues Not Met Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 03/13/2006 1. McMullen Booth Road is an arterial road with both high volume and high speed, the applicant Not Met shall construct a turnaround on private property. 2. Roadway width shall be 24' wide for bi-directional traffic. 3. Describe how the gate operates. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 03/07/2006 Provide 15 color copies of the wall and sign elevation. Not Met 03/07/2006 Provide dimensions for all sections of the wall (sidewalk gates, middle sections of the stucco wall). Not Met 03/07/2006 Clarify "7-0" SETBACK" label on the north portion of the wall. Not Met Print Date: 03/27/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 Mar. 27 2006 10:48AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94476847 Mar.27 10:47AM 01'11 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #104. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-FEELP-FAX C435-7329). • • ,rI 9.00 am Case Number: FLD2006-02005 - 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Owner(s): Renaissance Oaks Llc 163 Bayside Dr Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Ronald Letize 1928 Valencia Way Clearwater, Fl 33764 TELEPHONE: 727-536-5271, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 20.07 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road approximately 2,000 feet north of Union Street Atlas Page: 245A Zoning District: LDR, Low Density Residential Request: Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-104.D. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner II Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . Call "Sunshine", 8004324770, for utility locates prior to excavation for wall foundations. Environmental: I , No Issues Fire: I , Must install A Knox Key switch for gates in accordince with Pinellas County Ordinance. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I . Provide the location of the existing trees adjacent to the proposed wall on the site plan prior to CDB. 2. Additional comments may be forthcoming once this data is received and reviewed. Landscaping: I . Provide 15 copies of the landscape plan for the area around the proposed subdivision entry wall. Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: I , No Issues Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 16 0 0 11; 1. McMullen Booth Road is an arterial road with both high volume and high speed, the applicant shall construct a turnaround on private property. C)2. Roadway width shall be 24' wide for bi-directional traffic. 3. Describe how the gate operates? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note(s): 1) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Planning: 1 . Provide 15 color copies of the wall and sign elevation. 2. Provide dimensions for all sections of the wall (sidewalk gates, middle sections of the stucco wall). 3 . Clarify "2'-0" SETBACK" label on the north portion of the wall. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, March 30, 2006 - Page 17 `Clearwater March 06, 2006 Ronald Letiize 1928 Valencia Way Clearwater, F133764 .CITY OF CLEA'#0'itWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYCLEARWATER. C OM RE: FLD2006-02005 -- 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Ronald Letiize : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-02005. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on March 30, 2006, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I r- -- -- __ - ETL) 1:??e Z?-o ? I ? alr? Letter of Completeness - FLD2006-02005 - 2275 MCMULLEA arwa.r ,,C U February 28, 2006 Ronald Letiize 1928 Valencia Way Clearwater, F133764 *CITY OF CLEItRWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MY C LEARWATER. C OM RE: FLD2006-02005 -- 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Ronald Letiize : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2006-02005. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. -A 1. This submittal is lacking one signed and sealed and 14 copies of the property survey. 4 2. This submittal is lacking the previously submitted tree survey to verify location of proposed wall does not interfere with existing or proposed trees. Provide 15 copies. 3. Clarify if this request is including the gates and the entrance signs. The gates and the subdivision sign appear to be taller than six feet in height, however they are not dimensioned so it cannot be determined. Staff suggests lowering the heights to six feet and including them in the request, which will be favorably recommended. 4. A landscape buffer of three feet is required in front of the six foot tall wall, the plans provided indicate a two oot setback. Revise. 5. Note: A single-family subdivision is allowed one freestanding sign up to 24 square feet of total sign face. It appears that two signs are proposed ("Renaissance Oaks" and "R"). Additionally, the freestanding sign may be erected up to six feet in height. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Monday, March 6, 2006 (4:00 pm). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4547 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, JWin Schodtler Planner I Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2006-02005 - 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Conditions Associated With ' FLD2006-02005 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Landscape John Schodtler 727-562-4547 02/28/2006 Provide 15 copies of the landscape plan for the area around the proposed subdivision entry wall. Not Met Zoning Condition John Schodtler 727-562-4547 02/28/2006 This submittal is lacking one signed and sealed and 14 copies of the property survey. Not Met 02/28/2006 This submittal is lacking the previously submitted tree survey to verify location of proposed wall Not Met does not interfere with existing or proposed trees. Provide 15 copies. 02/28/2006 Clarify if this request is including the gates and the entrance signs. The gates and the subdivision Not Met sign appear to be taller than six feet in height, however they are not dimensioned so it cannot be determined. Staff suggests lowering the heights to six feet and including them in the request, which will be favorably recommended. 02/28/2006 A landscape buffer of three feet is required in front of the six foot tall wall, the plans provided Not Met indicate a two foot setback. Revise. 02/28/2006 Note: A single-family subdivision is allowed one freestanding sign up to 24 square feet of total sign Not Met face. It appears that two signs are proposed ("Renaissance Oaks" and "R"). Additionally, the freestanding sign may be erected up to six feet in height. Print Date: 02/28/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 & ) I u FLD2006-02005 t) 0 0 2275 MCMULLEN BOOTH RD Date Received: 02/23/2006 RENAISSANCE OAKS, LLC ZONING DISTRICT: LDR LAND USE: RS ATLAS PAGE: 245A PLANNER OF RECORD: JVS CLW CoverSheet 0 CDB Date: May 16, 2006 Case Numbers FLD2006-02005 Agenda Item: D4 Owner/Applicant: Gus Di Giovanni; Renaissance Oaks, LLC. Representative: Ronald Letize Address: 2275 McMullen Booth Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: • REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall residential subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2- 104.D. EXISTING ZONING / LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LDR) district / Residential Suburban (RS) Classification PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant. Proposed Use: 43 detached dwellings. ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USE: North: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) / detached dwellings South: County Residential / detached dwellings East: County Residential / detached dwellings West: Recreation Open Space / Open Space ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The site is 20.07 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road approximately 2,000 feet north of Union Street. The site is currently being cleared for the future development of 43 single-family residential dwelling units. The Development Review Committee under Flexible Standard Development case number FLS2005-07047/PLT2005-00016 approved the site for 43 detached single-family residential dwelling units on August 4, 2005. It is located in a part of the City characterized by attractive, well-maintained residential properties. Proposal: The proposal includes a masonry-stucco covered block wall five feet, seven inches in height and columns six feet in height with wrought iron-style entrance gates six feet in height. The fence will be constructed three feet from the front (east) property line as measured from McMullen Booth Road. It will traverse the front property line for a distance of 314.5 feet from the north property line to the south property line. The proposed fence will adjoin a similarly-styled fence on the property adjacent to the south. It is consistent with other fences and walls in the area with regard to style, scale and placement. In the Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning district, brick or other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substantial grill work with a maximum height of six feet in a required front setback area Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 1 • • are not specifically addressed in the fence code and as such are required to apply as a Level Two (Flexible Development - Residential Infill Project) approval. The fence code criterion is that such walls shall be architecturally compatible with the principal structure on the property and compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposed wall will utilize a stucco finish painted to complement the residential buildings proposed with the application. The wall steps back every 100 feet along McMullen Booth Road to provide horizontal relief. The wrought iron picket fencing is used in the gates to provide additional relief. The proposal includes extensive landscaping along McMullen Booth Road including live oak, lady and cardboard palms, lantana, indian hawthorn, bougainvillea, jasmine and azalea. One monument-style residential subdivision entry sign 24 square feet in area will be located at the center of the entrance. The signs will be architecturally incorporated into the design of the perimeter wall and to the buildings with regard to height, proportion, color, material and finish and meets the requirements of the Code. The site plan otherwise fulfills all of the requirements of a Flexible Development - Residential Infill Project application. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH RESIDENTIAL INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA Section 2-104. D : CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Residential Infill Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise X permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project is X compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Residential Infill Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 2 • E COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS (Code Section 3-913): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value X thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed X use. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation X impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS: 1. The 20.07 acre subject property is located within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District; 2. The proposal is consistent and compatible with other fences in the area with regards to material, scale and location and is architecturally compatible with existing walls in the immediate vicinity; 3. Applicant seeks relief from maximum wall/fence height limitation under Code provisions of Section 3- 804.A; 4. Proposed landscaping, use of stucco over masonry construction and wrought iron entry gates mitigate the height of the wall; 5. The wall will have no adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood; 6. The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion and is well outside any required sight visibility triangles; 7. The signage is creative, simple, and will contribute to the overall character of a place; and 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this property; CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Project criterion, per Section 2-104.D: 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 3 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on March 30, 2006. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-104.D., with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Project criterion, per Section 2-104.D. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. The final design and color of the wall and sign be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. Show the canopies of all trees to remain on the plan sheets prior to the issuance of the fence permit. The general rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH); 3. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture, prior to the issuance of the fence permit; and 4. The landscaping be installed and maintained according to the plan approved or modified by the Community Development Board; Mrs ' p 1 . Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: tpWV?/ ?n?Y/I.0'!-r? lid Jo6fi Schodtler, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning Departmen6C D BWLEX (FLD) (Pending cases) Up for the next DRCIMcMullen Booth 22 75 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVSIFLD2006-02005 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 4 • • John Schodtler 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 562-4547 iohn.schodtlerAmyclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida January 2006 to present Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional uses). Make presentations to various City Boards. Create custom Crystal reports for the planning department. • Planner I City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida March 2005 to January 2006 Duties consist of assisting customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional uses). Make presentations to various City Boards. Create custom Crystal reports for the planning department. • Development Review Specialist/Associate Planner City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 1998 to March 2005 Duties consist of assisting customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for Flexible Standard cases (variances & conditional uses). Create custom Crystal reports for the planning department. Computer Systems Administrator. Maintained the department computers, software and networking systems and trouble shooting difficulties at the departmental level and acting as liaison to the Informa- tion Technologies Department for larger scale problems. • Customer Service Representative City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 1996 to August 1998 Duties consist of assisting, directing and informing customers with occupational licenses and building permits. Additional duties involve greeting customers, reviewing building plans, accounting and general data entry. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Business Management, Minor in Human Development, Eckerd College, 2006 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Planning Association Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 5 • • FLD2006-02005 2275 McMullen Booth Road 3/6/2006 • ? - ' r, „ -- , - r I t u 3 OAKCOVEROR gem- r ~ 1°e sa .J J HALCREEK CRS °z L,., "?0 l MARLO BLVD"') g R g r"f ? ,en u,a +en ?-" WEATHERSTOKEDR It f- i v W ?? S ,we ,N. uu OS/R ? 1 [f`7 i , \rV $ t RHEOAKDR ' NOODCRQW DR S g "• q uo r- W r ? an ------------- - - - ------------ ma ; a,: l? rte.,., .r? ?..,-.._ `?• ) V ? I ? M t ZT? ]Ile -•___ ? ? A X A j f MN D r_ r`` r. ?eo rn r' ?-? -7 r-I fr,' us ,? Zoning Map Owner. Gus Di Giovanni - Renaissance Oaks, LLC Case: FLD2006-02005 Sites: 2275 McMullen Booth Road Property 20 Size Acres : Atlas 245A Page: PINS: 33/28/16/00000/320/0200 S:\Pfanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\033006 DRC\McMulfen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVS\zoning.doc • o Q 'DEER RUN N 1 a 3 a ? R ao R EAgngro BLVD R M ? o ? ? "y Q RAI g ,p SWMTGUM VAY S m R a DEE O a PARKCREEK DR FERNNERv RD E $ w N vE? `.$d'i ? W g m w ? A?noa n > o ?i a a U Q 013A WAY U p SABER DR i YW W BOOTN BLVD. 4m AVE N 3 SUNSTREMi r? ] W OAK NA.L RD N Y? F, S DS ORN S N aE OAK COVE NILLCREEK CIR S XX x ONROOK Lt 1 2W AVE S d NARLO ?? c?j' NEATFERSTON Q D, C) S R K PROJECT S1TE DR CREST DR ,ONES U REN - ? a SAFETY H CTN Z o w CWJ1(fRY VNE CIa RN a ? ESS CYPR F DR F RD y MO.. N BER1lJJY S Ciao RS 6 @ U ? Chals9e 5 N CYPRESS CTS m c1MDBJ ? S ELYSIUM d WAY n STREET UN ON O@ FDL NARBCR UOKS (7R L ROBINWOOD d .. 4m 5T. O -STEAD Cr dg ' O V+ HOMESTEPD OPHS Location Map Owner. Gus Di Giovanni - Renaissance Oaks, LLC Case: FLD2006-02005 Sites: 2275 McMullen Booth Road Property 20 Size Acres : Atlas 245A Page: PINS: 33/28/16/00000/320/0200 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\033006 DRC\McMullen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVS\location.doc • • L r ? •r? -? 3 a1 yy OAK COYERDR , ? ? ,ers RLLCREEK CRS O F ^-? '_rJ F r T J ur Li R? Q C a ti 4J1 ?1? ?^ L_l ur R iL? r .? - 7 3 C`?'X' U , S ,nz o Ap tm5 MARLO eLw v S P 7f Y ^ _ ?' •/? WEATKERSTOREDR RIOS J I L I° ?s?? v ?° ( k ms R(OS -) lu MOODCRE KD HNE OAK OR E RS W TEA ^l `^? ? L P w" j 111 +m e ,a mo 1 ? J ? i it zn1 ,t no 1 r ti nos O W .J LJ y._J m f g WA E RIOS z? CI '??"] z? zzb zm -- ----------------- g q? _ 11 - y A tin r)? i W( J ?Sa N r 7 F ( :zA zne p11 -- -. - ? ?-J 'J X01 4 IJ - ?1 V 1 111 ,U s- _ L Lff RS = e Future Land Use Map Owner. Gus Di Giovanni - Renaissance Oaks, LLC Case: FLD2006-02005 Sites: 2275 McMullen B ooth Road Property 20 Size Acres : Atlas 245A Page: PINS: 33/28/16/00000/320/0200 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending coses\Up for the next DRC\033006 DRC\McMullen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) ivs\future land use.doc 0 • I ?- , te , I PKLCREEC CAP S `r ~ ? ' ? > Q Q r?i W S r? y Q // `/ % 2 , ?1 ' ` -r' ?- ` r' t 17 ?J-? L ?7} r S7 fAN 1M6 J AIARLOB S WD ? ? mn ,m s ur, ?:--? WEATHE RSTO NED R , , v W utri/ as Via: ?; ? 2 .i Y C ?' t# f L I Z s PIKE OAK DR W DODCR EEKO RS N'? ? A m "? C71 e ""i CC ° ? a EH/1lilfilKiiiHlE! W y VCT SFR rL; R' 1 - - - SF ?s me tji m. Je _ as mr xor i 't C1 q t~I nN nu xqz L 7_11 :? 2- L _3 ?. ii Existing Use Map Owner. Gus Di Giovanni - Renaissance Oaks, LLC Case: FLD2006-02005 Sites: 2275 McMullen Booth Road Property 20 Size Acres : Atlas 245A Page: PINS: 33/28/16/000001320/0200 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLDJ\Pending cases\Up for the next DRC\033006 DRC\McMullen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVS\existing.doc 0 SAPlannina Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pendinq cases\Up for the next DRC\033006 DRC\McMullen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVS\Aerial.doc 0 • FLD2006-02005 2275 McMullen Booth Road 3/6/2006 Subject propert}- 2271 McMullen Booth Road Eastern Frontage. 0 • Subject Property 227-5 McMullen Booth Road. Subject Property 2275 McMullen Booth Road. 0 • Subject Propert< 227-5 McMullen Booth Road. Subject Proper(N 2275 McMullen Booth Road. 0 • Subject Propert} 2275 McMullen Booth Road. Adjacent Property to the South 3091 Crest DriN e 0 i Propert}- to the South 220 McMullen Booth Road 0j- R C ?I P9 a r O 49 O 3 V 5 g O U 0 Z 0 b .JVC?in LD2nC&Il0Il 2 M5 I e 2229 SIR, ? 22 3A _ so SD .,,• R SINN JO ENTLLftPRISE g ROM E. : - ,,,,11 CITY OF CLEARWATER a STJ?' r? y ' R turwAtrn -2- 4 f, AND VICINITY PINEUAS COUNTY, FLORIDA .o Ap- j Q RCd D Yll]r 22lDdt >rab '° aar -'yt 22/047 92/Ot3 t I>, in• -' o 05 6e 67 r; 61 72 F PREPARED By UBLIC NOREP ADMINISTRATION ENCINIEING O . ? ` ! -- f 1 pp Cac (61, ft 33756 , 1$13)552-4750. 3)552 F? 4 5 e 0 O .4 . 6q FERNERY LAME :. //rww dearralW q.com%? ghe W/ 0 ti I 'Jt 67 70 I 1 Dlsdolma: O -19 `?^^^^?^^ «+^^. 2/(045 """ - :I ,?. °y 17 - Public Intormolian doto Is 1-11hed by the City of Clearwater Public Worts AlmiAlslralion/Enghaerinq, and must be accepted 4 2 - Q:22 3 and used by the reelplenl with the undenlondlnq that the doto reeeivad woc CollfCicd for the Purpose of cl-l.p'nq a aphis i f t r 7 ,•.\ ; Z k6 - n rps >uclure Inyenlay. AJ Wch, the City of Clearwater PWA/E 4 ? 6 2Q 7 a- motet lpl.-d ar Impiled, ncerninq tn9 occurocy, CCmpltleli4billty. u Roblilly of this doio for ny other Eurl Mrmore. Inc Clly of . QAKBROOK OFFICE CENTER PWAn m IWpllily rholtorver oneclolea with the i- of dal. ,uch 15 14 72 QTf' N This Allot e l a b l t l Ptm -j 1 u?/}?? CON t 01 t1 : 2 HAMMOCK PLACE It p g e fu lyd o prr odk shoo qtr. fa Mormolldn about latest revidwi please con PWA/E or OCR our W b at ttw 1 1D.10' Ct1UN)) W CIAYt 22/0,2 a 1 "' I lo3 Y / $ 2 1 [ NYY1 ]s 3D e r I 74 s9 sat l s.tnr NtRea. E j ? ?4 13 2A 26 77 1° OD N w 22 I .. !DI4 f v "Is t7 a ........i. .... tn)I g 30 29 1D , 4y 9 17 Y6 I ... „ y K till 5 a c,ce . K O CTAV4A WAY 35 3 19 R OAKDROOK ap,t ' l f 1Q. 1. .. 0190 200 400 600 Pros Joao s R 10 o m,r 9 3R p R 1 3333 23 Z2/Ot { 40 38 3 3 0 2 . dome o eO 0 K 0344 t `2 3 . 7 9 6 17 . 5 fJ SCALE: l" 4D0' tin 3 14a,t ors T 6 18 2 aoa43 6 _ 4 f: A2 43 034 15 46 I rasp 3010 13 N 7 mt42 CIRCLE g 2210,6 BOOTH R w w >Z ?. M $0 DWLEVAAD ql 34 LEGEND; 2 to IS I 16 17 I @ IS 1 1 9 1 21 20 : $7 60 © BLOCK NUMBER tsRe >_ ... 55 54 5T 52 5t 7D 19 4?i q P3e> .o ° 7 6 S 3 2 1 E _ T : 1234 LOT AQDRESS 3 g ' $ o $ 8 w 1 2 0 34 33 32 3r 3D 29: Ig 27 : 26 25 24 tsar 4 I r,? R to eve 35 ? - ?- CITY LIMITS LINE " 9 taxi OAK HILL RO M S ? _ WCOOCROQ( DRIVE N ORTH 5 D 2 1 2 A 3 C 4 5 M w 1 mm P+a'. ° ,. 13: 3 4; tt 035 76 47 16 ROPERTY r-i SHADED AREA - P OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS 6 2 ma fps $ T 0 E AGREEMENT TO ANNEX Paea n 12 7 4 A O 303 21 CITY OWNED PROPERTY 12 t mu 1or 9 OAK COVE DRIVE 0 51 50 49 39 9 4 10 MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ta i 8 4 5 $ f d +seJ ter ? 59 q ZONE LINE S! a 11 1p Q ° ran Zi am> ? ' m 15 al 1I ? oN 6 p VC( mN 11 ? : t? ?B In / ?OQ : 71 ? 030 $ NARLO 6 P! R ao 3 ?SY ao 12 U R B t qs 'WO 2 .: - \ 72 17 --j---r---^ --- 77 TR I 161 G3 B2 ti i - l8 'p y 'x NrIKY app Rclow ORD m eD9p tt/IV/es p r)st at/I9/e9 m 3333 qPS/ap 59. J/p/q6 1 me t b. ,? 2 9 ? tm 0 76 1 5 19 _? m Bost 7,14/se I ° 8 3 ao fJP1 as mt1 b N 7,, b.4T 1 > I I I C *CATHERSIOHE 70 79 14 ! I `i.. 1 65 66 67 68 ? i. b: ZO 23/01 tf 7 B 2 Put 6 I , A / ' 73 1 \ i ) 21 •' I D. D. OAKS PARK 6 A ?, aN 0 4 7 6 w S , 3 ( I g - a / ? 63 33 B4 83 8. 1 ?\ /t 12 ,. %t4tF I ass-rns 9 s to s I ' A 22 O-K, mD Qlrn Ir/n/ w S/R -0 10 PIN OAK DRIVE ? I I ? ? ? ORI? °IX1fH i? \ f ??. 1 T D .0 an 41,10, R 2 9 ° 7 IS We t 1 1 9 , 5 0 I 4 203 REVISED: 8/31 /99 g' ZONING ATLAS 24 48 ? 4 5A ? NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33 - 28 S - 1fi F Z ?. )4-FQ 0 FLD2006-02005 2275 McMullen Booth Road 3/6/2006 • • r,,, - 7- -W ?YcC S Subject property 2275 McMullen Booth Road Eastern Frontage. • • Subject Property 2275 McMullen Booth Road. • • Subject Property 2275 McMullen Booth Road. Subject Property 2275 McMullen Booth Road. • Subject Property 2275 McMullen Booth Road. 0 • 411.1 Subject Property 2275 McMullen Booth Road. 0 • Adjacent Property to the South 3093 Crest Drive - a Property to the South 2205 McMullen Booth Road MapQuest: Maps Page 1 of 1 Control Your Cravings Lose Weight 2275 N Mcmullen Booth Rd Lose 10 Ibs in 5 weeks Clearwater FLT - t 33759-1420 US Cr "99-110-121 123-137-151 103-W;-1271 1'20-1 32-156 Notes: 52 1 U -1 U-132 1.32 147-162 ' -w t• llYCL,''IlC tr=OC MET- <. *RESULTS 00T T5'F'9cnL °CUCR FOR DETRILS o Swe?+tgum'rVay 5 ?.?I??e Lr?l3?? 4 Abr?hu.,,d - - Haftor Woods Cff P-,k Enfer rise Rd E r+ss, t u, PI-. Enterprise Rd' E ca Gtona'Ct v _" G? Fayette Or 1 o m i - °? ttte or 5 Harrimo? Pi ? ? a day C? ro Fairmont Ave 4? Cac€asrlatMay 6?a CL {A { U7 0 Hampton 61 n' _ _.._ 1ve . % M rstret?mn a - " aC 4Yl Jtlttbr'?at$ ?3 ,GGt'`- L!1 HAcreek Cir G o i c5 FthY1 cx gtD . Q' ' p "n f 7C,-4 i -- C1. Governors Ln u' F,taC~;fial? Cyss Hollow Ca `$ - - Jotter. L,i ChancerY Ln _ it1o, +? a N ; Harbor Lake Of - s Bethany PI Cypro 1`race Dr Booth St Hatbor Lnke tt Butler t Union St Cf dar St ?s t, ektrum St€ (d > 4 ;? ?' 'tT K f7 afiocy Harbor Point P1 0 5 ,1 2 Funk Hatbot Oaks Abbey Lake Rd MnAn Lidt3ier Ding Pt N 1?-. Robinsvood Or Home tend ? JU thlaco?,oltre ?t - o,2N6 P.4a?Qe?est, ?rc " ?2Q4Fi?1? V7E All rights reserved. Use Subject to License/Copyright This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=bLaOkxtG3xvrUPj 9EUgz8sKA5cJZY... 2/28/2006 -i 1 CDB Date: May 16, 2006 Case Numbers FLD2006-02005 Agenda Item: D4 Owner/Applicant: Gus Di Giovanni; Renaissance Oaks. LLC. Representative: Ronald Letize Address: 2275 McMullen Booth Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall residential subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2- 104.D. EXISTING ZONING / LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LDR) district / Residential Suburban (RS) Classification PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant. Proposed Use: 43 detached dwellings. ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USE: North: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) / detached dwellings South: County Residential / detached dwellings East: County Residential / detached dwellings West: Recreation Open Space / Open Space ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The site is 20.07 acres located on the east side of McMullen Booth Road approximately 2,000 feet north of Union Street. The site is currently being cleared for the future development of 43 single-family residential dwelling units. The Development Review Committee under Flexible Standard Development case number FLS2005-07047/PLT2005-00016 approved the site for 43 detached single-family residential dwelling units on August 4, 2005. It is located in a part of the City characterized by attractive, well-maintained residential properties. Proposal: The proposal includes a masonry-stucco covered block wall five feet, seven inches in height and columns six feet in height with wrought iron-style entrance gates six feet in height. The fence will be constructed three feet from the front (east) property line as measured from McMullen Booth Road. It will traverse the front property line for a distance of 314.5 feet from the north property line to the south property line. The proposed fence will adjoin a similarly-styled fence on the property adjacent to the south. It is consistent with other fences and walls in the area with regard to style, scale and placement. In the Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning district, brick or other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substantial grill work with a maximum height of six feet in a required front setback area Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 1 0 • are not specifically addressed in the fence code and as such are required to apply as a Level Two (Flexible Development - Residential Infill Project) approval. The fence code criterion is that such walls shall be architecturally compatible with the principal structure on the property and compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposed wall will utilize a stucco finish painted to complement the residential buildings proposed with the application. The wall steps back every 100 feet along McMullen Booth Road to provide horizontal relief. The wrought iron picket fencing is used in the gates to provide additional relief. The proposal includes extensive landscaping along McMullen Booth Road including live oak, lady and cardboard palms, lantana, indian hawthorn, bougainvillea, jasmine and azalea. One monument-style residential subdivision entry sign 24 square feet in area will be located at the center of the entrance. The signs will be architecturally incorporated into the design of the perimeter wall and to the buildings with regard to height, proportion, color, material and finish and meets the requirements of the Code. The site plan otherwise fulfills all of the requirements of a Flexible Development - Residential Infill Project application. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH RESIDENTIAL INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA lCnr+inn 2_1(ld DI: CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Residential Infill Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise X permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project is X compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Residential Infill Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 2 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS (Code Section 3-913): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value X thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed X use. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation X impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS: 1. The 20.07 acre subject property is located within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District; 2. The proposal is consistent and compatible with other fences in the area with regards to material, scale and location and is architecturally compatible with existing walls in the immediate vicinity; 3. Applicant seeks relief from maximum wall/fence height limitation under Code provisions of Section 3- 804.A; 4. Proposed landscaping, use of stucco over masonry construction and wrought iron entry gates mitigate the height of the wall; 5. The wall will have no adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood; 6. The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion and is well outside any required sight visibility triangles; 7. The signage is creative, simple, and will contribute to the overall character of a place; and 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this property; CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Project criterion, per Section 2-104.D: 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 3 0 0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on March 30, 2006. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-104.D., with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Project criterion, per Section 2-104.D. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. The final design and color of the wall and sign be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. Show the canopies of all trees to remain on the plan sheets prior to the issuance of the fence permit. The general rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH); 3. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture, prior to the issuance of the fence permit; and 4. The landscaping be installed and maintained according to the plan approved or modified by the Community Development Board; Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: OP&Wel uS. 4 t'4? Jo Schodtler, Planner II ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next DRCIMcMullen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVSIFLD2006-02005 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 4 John Schodtler 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 (727) 562-4547 i ohn.schodtler(a)myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida January 2006 to present Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional uses). Make presentations to various City Boards. Create custom Crystal reports for the planning department. • Planner I City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida March 2005 to January 2006 Duties consist of assisting customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review and preparation of staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, Flexible Standard and Flexible Development cases (variances and conditional uses). Make presentations to various City Boards. Create custom Crystal reports for the planning department. • Development Review Specialist/Associate Planner City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida August 1998 to March 2005 Duties consist of assisting customers with basic zoning and planning related issues. Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for Flexible Standard cases (variances & conditional uses). Create custom Crystal reports for the planning department. Computer Systems Administrator. Maintained the department computers, software and networking systems and trouble shooting difficulties at the departmental level and acting as liaison to the Informa- tion Technologies Department for larger scale problems. • Customer Service Representative City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida October 1996 to August 1998 Duties consist of assisting, directing and informing customers with occupational licenses and building permits. Additional duties involve greeting customers, reviewing building plans, accounting and general data entry. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Business Management, Minor in Human Development, Eckerd College, 2006 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES American Planning Association Staff Report - Community Development Board -May 16, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 5 n9A?l?' CDB Date: ApLUj!t 2006 Case Numbers FLD2006-02005 Agenda Item: F-10 Owner/Applicant: Gus Di Giovanni; Renaissance Oaks, LLC. Representative: Ronald Letize Address: 2275 McMullen Booth Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: DRAFT REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-104.D. EXISTING ZONING / LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LDR) district / Residential Suburban (RS) Classification PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant. Proposed Use: 43 detached dwellings. ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USE: North: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) / detached dwellings South: County Residential / detached dwellings East: County Residential / detached dwellings West: Recreation Open Space / Open Space ANALYSIS: C kA r?" Site Location and Existing Conditions: The site is 20.07 acres located on the east side of Mc u n Booth Road approximately 2,000 feet north of Union Street. The site is currently bein raze for the future development of 43 single- family residential dwelling units. The Development eview Committee under Flexible Standard Development case number FLS2005-07047/PLT2005-00016 approved the site for 43 detached single-family residential dwelling units on August 4, 2005. It is located in a part of the City characterized by attractive, well-maintained residential properties. Proposal: The proposal includes a masonry-stucco covered block wall five feet in height and columns six feet in height with wrought iron-style entrance gates five feet in height. The proposed total price of the fence is $14,000. The fence will be constructed three feet from the front (east) property line as measured from McMullen Booth Road. It will traverse the front property line to a distance of ?oc• Staff Report - Community Development Board -April 18, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 1 314.5 feet from the north property line to the south property line. The proposed fence will adjoin a similarly-styled fence on the property adjacent to the south. It is consistent with other fences and walls in the area with regard to style, scale and placement. In the Low Density Residential (LDR) zoning district, brick or other masonry walls or walls with masonry columns linked by substantial grill work with a maximum height of six feet in a required front setback area are not specifically addressed in the fence code and as such are required to apply as a Level Two (Flexible Development - Residential Infill Project) approval. The fence code criterion is that such walls shall be architecturally compatible with the principal structure on the property and compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposed wall will utilize a stucco finish painted to complement the residential buildings proposed with the application. The wall steps back every 100 feet along McMullen Booth Road to provide horizontal relief. The wrought iron picket fencing is used in the gates to provide additional relief. The proposal includes extensive landscaping along McMullen Booth Road including live oak, bald cypress, bird of paradise, Indian hawthorn, saw palmetto, jasmine and iris. One freestanding monument-style signs 24 square feet in area will be located at the center of the entrance. The signs will be architecturally incorporated into the design of the perimeter wall and to the buildings with regard to height, proportion, color, material and finish and meets the requirements of the Code. The site plan otherwise fulfills all of the requirements of a Flexible Development - Residential Infill Project application. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH RESIDENTIAL INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (Section 2-104. W: CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Residential Infill Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Residential Infill Project are otherwise X permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Residential Infill Project is X compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Residential Infill Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project creates a form and function that 1 Staff Report - Community Development Board -April 18, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 2 enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and X off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Cn1VIPI.IANCF. WITI4 GFNFRAT. APPI.IC:ARIT.ITV STANDARDS (Code Section 3-913): CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value X thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed X use. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation X impacts on adjacent properties. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS: 1. The 20.071cre subject property is located within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District; 2. The proposal is consistent and compatible with other fences in the area with regards to material, scale and location and is architecturally compatible with existing walls in the immediate vicinity; 3. Applicant seeks relief from maximum wall/fence height limitation under Code provisions of Section 3-804.A; 4. Proposed landscaping, use of uminum picke ncing and stepbacks every 100 feet mitigate the height of the wall; 5. The wall will have no adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood; 6. The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion and is well outside any required sight visibility triangles; 7. The signage is creative and simple and will contribute to the overall character of a place; and 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this property; Staff Report - Community Development Board -April 18, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 3 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Project criterion, per Section 2-104.D: 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on March 30, 2006. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-104.D., with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Project criterion, per Section 2-104.D. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the wall and sign be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That a six foot tall green or black vinyl coated chain link fence be constructed along the east property line and the forty count of seven gallon Yew Podocarpus be 48 inches in height at time of install to help buffer the residential properties to the east; 3. That the landscaping be installed and maintained according to the plan approved or modified by the Community Development Board; Prepared by: Planning Department Staff. John Schodtler, Planner I ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next DRCIMcMullen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVSIFLD2006-02005 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board -April 18, 2006 - Case FLD2006-02005 - Page 4 MapQuest: Maps 0 2275 N Mcmullen Booth Rd Clearwater FL 33759-1420 US Notes: av Sw"tgurrt way's (Q r?rk ESe R{I E 0 Gliona'Ct q jt? !n Sunstr_e#am Ln Hilcreek C"ir L Lake ` rr;z?tr?uR,,a N z 'ay! r Harrytarr ? I iuruLn Kngsoot Ct Covirn6m n r 15?.?.?? o Cir st's? GN,ts Y Be1it Pl _any {;yptr<s T bi eysittm Lay- "ion St , C11ciar St 0 _ ?yivnn - Ahil-9 ?(c?nnr-3u7 Harbot POitO I Park Hwbor Oaks Ir Abb py take 'Rd , Mar n er King Robinwodd Or Haute ad (#t) 0 2406 Mapoue'5t, lnc, Booth St Harbor LLa4LCt Butler St t eklimm St C U Z !5 All rights reserved. Use Subject to License/Copyright This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Page 1 of 1 HOME LOANS l a c - o Pre-Qualify For a Loan Loan Type: Select o How Much Can I Borrow? Loan Amount: * What Will MV Payments Be? . ....._ Area Code: 0 75 or 30 Year Term Find o Refinance o Home Equity o consolidate Debts o Home Imormtement rf i Lr)(7 j3X0 1 0-r M cy Hoilaw Ct Cre4 or )one,, L4l http://www.mapquest.com/maps/print.adp?mapdata=bLaOkxtG3xvrUPj 9EUgz8sKA5cJZY... 3/7/2006 P LONG RANGE MANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW May 16, 2006 Mr. Ron Letize 1928 Valencia Way Clearwater, FL 33764 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CI"FARWATER, FwRIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL" SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: Development Order for case number: FLD2006-02005 - 2275 McMullen Booth Road Dear Mr. Letize: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On May 16, 2006, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval to construct a six-foot tall residential subdivision wall within the front (east) setback along McMullen Booth Road, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, per Section 2-104.D. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following finding of fact and conclusions of law and conditions. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. The 20.07 acre subject property is located within the Low Density Residential (LDR) District; 2. The proposal is consistent and compatible with other fences in the area with regards to material, scale and location and is architecturally compatible with existing walls in the immediate vicinity; 3. Applicant seeks relief from maximum wall/fence height limitation under Code provisions of Section 3- 804.A; 4. Proposed landscaping, use of stucco over masonry construction and wrought iron entry gates mitigate the height of the wall; 5. The wall will have no adverse health or safety impacts in the neighborhood; 6. The proposal will have no effect on traffic congestion and is well outside any required sight visibility triangles; 7. The signage is creative, simple, and will contribute to the overall character of a place; 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this property; 9. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development, Residential Infill Project criterion; per Section 2-104.1); 10. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 11. Based on the above findings and.proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. Conditions of Approval: 1. The final design and color of the wall and sign be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICF? MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL NlliMBF.R HOYr HANUIXON, COUNCILMHMBP.R ® CARLI:N A. h: rizRSEN, COUNCHAIEN111H "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND Ar•FIRMA'rIvi: Ac:*rION LNIPLOYFR" Page 2 • • May 16, 2006 FLD2006-02005 2. Show the canopies of all trees to remain on the plan sheets prior to the issuance of the fence permit. The general rule for hardwoods is one-foot radius for each diameter inch (DBH); 3. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture, prior to the issuance of the fence permit; and 4. The landscaping be installed and maintained according to the plan approved or modified by the Community Development Board. Pursuant to Section 4407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by May 16, 2007). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Schodder, Planner H at (727) 5624547 or via e-mail at john.schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director SA\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Inactive or Finished Applications\McMullen Booth 2275 Renaissance Oaks Wall (LDR) JVS\FLD2006-02005 Development Order.doc ORIGINAL RECEIVED APR o,17 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER a 71 1 3 sL1;a &'. b r s Al y? rte. FLa C;W - aa-nos -"S a ????u??6ot? Residential Commercial MAGNUM HOMES, INC. RONALD LETIZE President 1928 Valencia Way 727-536-5271 Clearwater, FL 33764 CBC 01164 - 1 1 42"1, -tm [ 1112 ` ~oa~ a a ~o ~ x M . .,~,_,~.-----m-. ~ k~ a ,~s a O Vii: * ~ ~ ~ y ~ MM W ar:ro ` - M v r I M M ~y r. ~ 1.! ......a. ~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ ; ~ h J I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ f ~ - I W _ ~ _ ..__~..w s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 16~ a ~ L = o Q Y~ . ~ r I H ~ f" ~ ~ Q _ a _ _ ~ I 1 a a ~ H M i j ` i 1 /~~A1flliii llj~ /jt. A ~ r~ ~ ~ Ct 4 ~ co• • , ~ - ~ o~_ Q Q ~~'~I ~'~ia' ~~~FIIftIHHtIl. -af,,. ® RENAISSANCE OAKS i ~ _ ' /r zz.. ~ ~ ~ 'ri 1 ~ ~ n t ~.n, - a 1 ENTRANCE SIGN ONLY NOT ~l o ; D 24sf 0 TO EXCEE 2'-4" SCALE =1I4" = 1'-0" ti o~,.,;; ° . - KNOCKOUT BLOCK WI ° i (1) #5 BAR HORIZ. CONT.---~ ~ F i i i i o o~ j i (1) #5 BAR VERT. @ 4'-0" O.C. - a ti co W m i i MINIMUM LAP 25" ~ o i CORSE GROUT FILL 2500 PSI ~ ~ j i i 16" X 16" CONC i COLUMN ~ so i ~ - NOTE: N i MINIMUM SETBACK FROM ! 20" W X 12" H GRADE ~ I ~ i PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE 3-0 CONCRETE WALL ~ ! FOOTING W! (2) #5 ~ z j NO EXISTINGTREES WITHIN I i BARS CONT. ~ ~ i j 20'-0' , „ WALL FOOT j 20-0 ~ , „ I j 5'-0" 5 -0 n n 24" X 24" X 10" H L' m m J o ~ 16 x16 CONC BLOCK COL W/ ' GATE CONCRETE COLUMN I STONE VENEER 1'-8" ~ ! FOOTING WI (3) #5 BARS E.W. (BEYOND) y ~ 3 ~ TOP OF NEW DETENTION POND I ~ LA CA G I o i ~0 ~ i ~ ~ ~W j ~ ~ N ®°G ~ ~ I y i~ o w ~ i ~ Q~~ ~y F ~ ~ ~ ~ YQ ~ ( - V ~ 00 ~o ~ SCALE = v2° _ ~'-o° ~ ° ~ I ~ ~ o0 I I ~ ER BRICK CCESS DRIVE SIGH S GH - NEW PAV TRIAN LE ~ a~ I TRIA GLE WITH 21'-4" RADIUS URN AROUND ~ WLFACE (TYP) ~ ~ /p j _ ~-0"TOCOLFACE(TYP) 3'-0" ~ ~ W PROPERTY LINE 3'-0"SET BACK TO COL. 24'-0" LANDSCAPE BY DREW COPLE ~ m CENTER LINE OF COLTO ~ ORIGINAL ~ ~ v PER CITY GUIDELINES CENTER LINE OF COL {f`!P.) RECEIVED ~ ~ sx~s^ sw. coNC. PRIOR TO CDB NEW OAK 9a'-4° 1'-4° BLOCKS 2~~6 (TYP. OF MANY) APR 0'~ ~ o 99'-10° 30'-3" 63'-8112" 21'-6" ® ® ® N N 51e° srUCCO OVER LATH PLANNING DEPARTMENT Q FINISH CITY OF CLEARWATER b 314'-6" ~ a 0 (4)#5REBAR SITE I~~I~ APPROVED VERTICE Y5^LAF CASE# Fti~ zoot,,- ozoo5 f FGGTING BELOW CASE TYPE F~.I~ ll DRC DATE p3 ~ o ~ _ - - - CDB PATE o s l G a6 {~1(L~/nN~y11~ F~EEww~EE++,]~~~...... ~ ~0 ~ nor A ~ i~~~/~ Y ~~Ii..~W~YYY ~ W YIIIN SCALE =1" = 1'-0" 0 r. U IRRIGATION LEGEND GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES Symbol Specification 5F-B Rambird 5' Radus Full Grc1e Bubbler I . Install a new automatic Irrlgatlon system to provide 100% coverage of all landscape areas. b A 5h-B Rambird 5' Radius fia~f Grcle Bubbler 2 Shrub risers shall only be used in hedges or mass plantings, Risers shall not extend more than 2"above the ~ A 5Q-B Rambird 5' Radius Quarter Grcle Bubbler mstalled height of the plant, Alf rlsers shall be schedule 40 pipe, painted black. In no case shall shrub rlsers be mstalled adjacent to walkways, driveways or other areas where they may be damaged, 4 5CST-B Rambird 5' Radus Center Strip Bubbler 3. All heads Installed in planting areas along walks, drives and parking lots shall be 12" pop-up fixed spray ~ I of Rambird I o' Padius Fuu Circle sprayhead heads. All heads shall be installed with the top of the spray body flush with finish grade. All groundcover areas I OTQ Rainbird 10' Radus Three Quarter Circle sprayhead shall be Irrigated with 12" pop-up fixed spray heads and extensions as requlred. I off Rainbird 10' Radus 11a1f Grc1e sprayhead 4. All sodded areas shall be Irrigated with 4° pop-up spray heads or pop-up gear driven heads unless I OQ Rambird 10' Radius Quarter Grcle sprayhead otherwise specified. O 15F Rambmd 15' Radius Full Grcle sprayhead 5. Pipe, valves and other irrigation equipment maybe shown m drives, walks or buildings for clarity only. Install I O 15TQ Rambird 15' Radius Three Quarter Grcle sprayhead all valves and other equipment in landscape beds for best accessibility and concealment. • ~ I i 6. Valves shall be mstalled m a manifold within a valve box of sufficient size to service all valves within the box. o O 1511 Rainbird 15' Radius Half Circle sprayhead Valve box shall be free from any debris which may cover valves. Prowde a 3" depth gravel sump at the bottom of n. I I O 15Q Rambird 15' Padius Quarter Circle sprayhead the valve pit. ~ I I I • O15EST Rambird 15' Radus End Strip sprayhead 7, All irrigation equipment and installation techniques shall rheet federal, state and local codes, regulations and 01 i I I I ordinances. 0 QI 55ST Rambird F5 Radius Side Strip sprayhead 8. All gear driven heads and all heads along walks, curbs, drives and arkln areas shall be mstalled on flexible I I l I QI 5CST Rambird 15' Radius Center Strip sprayhead polyethylene swing ~omts, p g I I O r-25F Hunter 1-z5 Fuu Circle Gear Drven Head 9. Gear driven heads and fried spray heads shall be Installed on separate zoneswhere possible. Pregpitation I ' I ' rates and head type should be compatible within each zone, I ' I ' OI-25ADJ hunter I-25 AdJustable Radus Gear Driven head 10. Gear driven heads shall not be mstalled In shrub areas or be Installed on rlsers where possible. I ~ ' I ' I I . Controller shall be mounted as shown on plan I water Source -Reclaimed water - 12. All sleeves shall be schedule 40 pipe Installed a minimum of 14" below grade. Sleeves shall be used onl y verify source to Install lateral Irrlgatlon lines through. Sleeves shall not be used as a method to convey water through the l ~ ~ • • system. g I ~ I ® NETAFIM DRIP IRRIGATION 13. Adjust all heads to provide maximum coverage and efficiency and minimize overthrow. Irngatlon heads shall y 12" emitter spacing - f 2" tech Ime not spray over walks, drives or any other non-Irrigated areas. I I ~ spacing 14. Equipment shall be manufactured by, 'Toro", "Rainbird" or "Bunter" or as otherwise stated on the plans, ' Controller: DUAL PROGRAM 15. Contractor shall field verify water source to deliver the proper pressure, pounds per square Inch (P51) and i I I CONTROLLER water flow, gallons per minute (GPM) as requlred by the Irrlgatlon system. Notify the Landscape Architect If there a, INSTALL RAIN SENSOR 15 any discrepancy. ~ N ' 16. All permits requred for installation shall be provided by the contractor. !I a ~ a I ~ I I S ~ m N Sch. 4o P.V.C. Main Lne. 17. Refer to the Landscape Plans when locating all Irrlgatlon equipment. Allow ample room near Irrlgatlon ~ S O 5 ~ equipment for the proper installation of trees, shrubs and other work shown on drawings to be installed. ~ ~ o ~ L' i ,~,t ' BOU i i I8. All wires shall be installed m wire sleeves, w ~ ~ ~ g., ~ ' o i 2 19. Contractor shall be responsible for all Items on the plan and Irrlgatlon specification. 0 c ~ 4 20. Contractor shall instruct the owner on the full operation and maintenance of the Irrlgatlon system. o ~ !00 ! QV • i Z I . Contractor shall be responsible for all final repairs or adjustments to provide proper coverage to all L 30 A I i TJV landscape areas, i 5 ' 22. All questions regarding Irngatlon specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect at (727) i g RE 18 787-2840. LAM • ZFU i i 5 i I i i RE I i GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES - i 18 ~ ~ i ' GATE ATE I I LAM I . All plant materials shall be Florida # I or better and Installed to highest nursery standards. Plants shall be i 30 i TJN ~ i healthy, free of pest and disease. 2. All plants shall be container grown except as noted on plan. I I TO NEW DE ON 20 130 5 i • TJN I 3. All palms and trees shall have straight trunks with no twists, knot~ng or other defective characteristics. ! 12 I i 4. Mulch shall be 100% Plne Bark, mstalled to a minimum thickness of 3" I LAM ® M 5. Sod shall be 95% weed free 5t. Augustine "Floratam", mstalled with tight!omts. i 8 p ~ i 0 ; i D i 6. All dimensions shall be field checked by the Landscape Contractor prior to construction with any • i dlscrepancles reported to the Landscape Architect. 7. All materials shall be as specified on the plans. If materials, labor or Installation techniques do not adhere eA i ~ K< 2 ~ ~ =s; to the specifications, they will be re!ected by the Landscape Architect with speafied materials and installation I NEW PAV 8 CK ACCESS DRNE ~ l •`Ei: ~ WITH21'~"RADIUS TURNAROUND ' carried out by the Landscape Contractor at no additional cost. s cS 8. No substitutions of materials or changes to the drawings or specifications shall be made. i ~ O~ 9. All requlred permits are to be provided by the Installing contractor unless specifically stated otherwise In the specifications. 10. Contractor identification signs shall not be allowed on the project. 12 12 12 12 _ 12 12 18 I I . Contractor shall be responsible for all Items as shown or described on this plan and specfications. LAM LAM LAM 20 LAM LAM LAM LAM 2 2 2 2 2 RI 6 2 2 2 2 12. All proposed landscape and sod areas containing turf or weeds shall be treated with "Round-up" per ZFU ZFU ZFU ZFU ZFU RO ZFU ZFU ZFU manufacturer's specifications. 13. Landscape Contractor shall provide all necessary site preparation required to ready the site for planting as zFu specified. 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 6 6 6 14. The landscape Contractor shall warranty and guarantee all materials and labor for a period of 90 days for RO RO RO RO RO ZFU RO RO RO RO shrubs and groundcover, palms and trees. Warranty and guarantee period shall begin upon date of completion. 5 15. All ,repairs andlor replacements shall be made by the landscape Contractor within I 0 working days upon notification of any de6aencles by the owner or their representative. QV 16. All questions regarding the Landscape Plans and Specifications shall be directed to the Landscape Architect at (727) 787-2840. R3 Q ~ FERTILIZATION ~ -v MCMULLEN-BOOTH ROAD Shrubs and Trees I~~ Q All trees and shrubs shall be fertilized with °Agrlform" 20- 15-5 planting tablets at time of planting and prior to ~ 4 Installation of plant pit backfill. Tablets shall be placed uniformly around the root ball at a depth that is between Q ~ the middle and bottom of the root ball. m ~ Apphcatlon Rate: ORIGINAL ~ 1 Gallon Container; I - 21 gram tablet RECEIVED 3 Gallon Container: 2 - 2 I gram tablets 5 Gallon Container: 3 - 2 I gram tablets ~P~ ~ ~ 2oQ6 Plant Materials Schedule 7 Gallon Container: 4 - 2 I gram tablets Trees: 3 tablets per each I12" caliper of trunk piANNING DEPARTMENT' ~ . Quantity Code Botamcal Name Common Name Specification Spacing CIIY OP CLEARWATER ~ V ~ Groundcover Areas ~ r ' I QO A Seasonal Color Annuals 6" pot 12" o.c. All groundcover areas shall receive fertlhzation with "Ozmocote" time release fertilizer per manufacturer's v 5 BOU Bougainvillea spp. Purple Bougainvillea 7 gal., 30" x 30" 30" o.c. Finish ®iidienmennlml 5nish Grade ®nntet Host m itnmm~ specifications. 150 LAM Lantana s " minimum ep ~e pp. Golden Lantana I gal„ 6 ht, x 12 spr, 18 o.c. minimum depth op-up d spray head Pop-up fixed spray head 1" 12 OV Quercus vlrglnlana Llve Oak 12'- 14' ht, x 5' spr., 2 I J2" cal. 35' o.c. 10 RE Rhapis excelsa lady Palm 7 gal., 30" x 30" 30" o.c. PIPE SIZING CHART 1 Install sleeves and -Install sleeves under all paved areas I RRI GATI 0 N SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS Lateral zone fines RI Raphlolepls mdlca Indian Hawthorn 3 gal., 18" ht. x 18" spr. 30" o.c. 0-5 GPM I/2" PVC PIPE Install sleeves and - lateral zone lines -Install sleeves under all paved areas I . Shallow wells. o en surface water bodies, or reclaimed water must be used as a source of ~ ~ 60 RO Rhododendron spp, Formosa Azalea 3 gal., 24" ht, x 24" spr, 30" o.c. Mainline p~p~~g 15e r Mainline piping (schedule 40 PVC) p 260 TJN Trachelospermum asiatlcum "minima" Dwarf Confederate Jasmine I gal„ 6" ht, x 12" spr. 18" o,c. 6- I 0 GPM 314" PVC PIPE Remote control va Irrlgatlon water. The distribution system for irrigation must not be connected to county or a -Remote control valve wnre5 to be installed under mamlme secure to mamlme at 8' intervals with waterproof municipal water sources, unless It can be demonstrated that these sources are not available. ~ 30 TJV Trachelospermum Jasminoides var, Var. Confederate Jasmine 3 gal„ 12" ht. x 18" spr. 30" o.c. I I-15 GPM i"PVC PIPE taperwrapped4ti tape wrapped 4 times around pipe at each location t , 26 ZFU Zamla furfuracea Cardboard Palm 7 gal., 30" x 30° 36" o.c. 16-25 GPM 1114" PVC PIPE 2. Irrlgatlon systems must utilize low volume design such as low tra!ectory heads or soaker ~ Q ~ 26- 35 GPM I I/2" PVC PIPE hoses to provide direct application and low evaporation. Systems that overspray areas that do -0 36-50 GPM 2" PVC PIPE IRRIGATION PIPE DEPT not require Irrigation, such as paved areas will not be acceptable. High Irrlgatlon need areas ~ d PIPE DEPTH DETAIL must not overspray low need areas. ~ 50+ GPM 2 112" PVC PIPE 3. 111gh water demand landscape areas such as turf must be served by a separate Irrigation zone than low water need areas, such as planter beds, or mulched areas with trees. In no case, shall any planted vegetation area be more than 50' from a water supply hose bib. 4. Automatic Irrigation systems must operate by an Irrigation controller capable of o eo Tree drl line 0o p 0o e ree drlpllne differentiating between schedules of high and low water demands areas. Controllers must have o e 0 0 o e multiple cycle start capacity and a flexible calendar program able to be set to comply with local 0 or water management district Imposed restrictions. 00 oe ' o ° 0 5. Automatic Irrigation systems must be equipped with a ram sensor device or switch which well o • o Existing tree to e override the Irrigation cycle of the sprinkler system when adequate rainfall has occurred. ~ remain oe a COPL$Y DESIGN ASSOCIATES, WC. L e o e e Set shrub 12 ua e were ° e '.LANDSCAPE Im ..g g ~ ° o p u b, with top 3 Mulch 12" Len th red NOTE: IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL IN5TALL NETAFIM A R C H I T E C T S 3" Mulch ° o o of rootball I" g ° ° 3 Tree wel plastic flag UNDERGROUND DRIP AT TI1E BASE OF EACf1 INSTALLED 1666 Laney Drive PROTECTIVE BARRIERS AND THE USE OF OTHER MEASURES TO PREVENT TREE q ,above finish to e DAMAGE (PESTICIDE APPLICATION, ROOT PRUNING, INTENSIVE MULCHING TO REDUCE Finish Grade o 9 - ° rade Flnlsh grade p SOIL COMPACTING, ET CETERA) WILL BE REQUIRED AS NECESSARY. ANY STACKING ;:;.v~;~~;,.; 48" Height I x4 pt rails TREE. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 6 EMITTERS PER TREE. ' W Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 INSTALL TREE IRRIGATION ON SEPARATE IRRIGATION ZONE 2x4 pt stake :w;.:•t;~< E I I OF SOILS, DEBRIS, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, VEHICLES, AND ETCETERA WITHIN ~ • ~ ••';;,.n;f<: x st n native 2x4 pt post AT CONTROLLER. SEE SHEET L- I FOR TREE LOCATIONS. Phone 727 787-2840 THE REQUIRED BARRi ADE Root ball Exlstin native Root ball r r: •r'°' g G S IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ANY TREE LOSSES INCURRED _ 9 ~ ° ` loll S N Fax 727 785-4017 Native soli sod 24 Depth DURING CONSTRUCTION MAY BE SUBJECT TO REPLACEMENT PENALTIES. Native sod backfdi Existing grade Landscape Architecture backfdl TREES SHALL BE TRIMMED OR PRUNED IN SUCH A MANNER SO AS NOT TO ALTER E Site Planning THEIR NATURAL FORM, GROWTH HABIT OR CHARACTER AND SHALL NOT BE PRUNED t-onaruction ivianagement INTO UNNATURAL SHAPES, INCLUDING CIRCLES OVALS 5 UA 5HRU8 PLANTING DETAIL O RESANDOTHER TREE PLANTING DETAIL TREE PROTECT o io 20 HARD-EDGED GEOMETRIC SHAPES. NOT MORE THAN ONE-THIRD OF THE TREE CANOPY SHALL BE TRIMMED OR PRUNED IN ANY YEAR UNLESS IT 15 DEAD. TREE 'ROTECTION DETAIL a~o o, JOB NO. 26022 TOPPING 15 NOT ALLOWED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE. rJ" Ca e = 20'-0" SHEET I