Loading...
FLD2004-03017 (2)U Cl a ypr U i Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) F ? L E C 0 P V p 4LEXIBLE C? DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Intill Redevelopment Project (Revised 1.0-10-2003) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- use additional sheers --_- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: GWT Tnp _Gf me MAILING ADDRESS: 2510 W. Prospect Road Tampa, FL 33629 E-MAIL ADDRESS: gwig y@tam abay.rr COMPHONENUMBER: 813.258.5240 CELL NUMBER: 813.732.6794 FAX NUMBER: 81 3.528.5241 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Craig Murtha, Ej oyln, Inc., Robert Resnik (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME(S): Greg Iglehart, Scott Doster, Ed Armstrong MAILING ADDRESS: 2510 W. Prospect Road, Tampa, FL 33629 E-MAIL ADDRESS: gwiggy@tampabay.rr.com PHONE NUMBER: 813.258.5240 CELL NUMBER: -.813,732.,6794 FAX NUMBER: 81 3 . 258. 5241 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 504 Jasmine Wav LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" (if not listed here, please note the locatW of this document in the submittal) (? r PARCEL NUMBER: See Exhibit A l?J I t• ii PARCEL SIZE: 2.6 Acres f (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: 45 Townhome Residences s ?-- (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential us[FLMNING & DEVELOFMMN DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Exhibit "B" parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of Ij O O -t I V Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater I t t DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE 'RrANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO _X_- (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) EX SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. L6' 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is loca ed. See At ached Response 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. - - - - °` (f?, I I I ??? S _- - _ 1 i ul I MAI I I &WI J w f' 1•iAc"t,nrjVMJ CI 1 1 llr G"h- iK-41 t.0 Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevellf-hen'tWo ect- City of Clearwater ` ' t ' Ah r, 2. The development of the parcel proposLIu or development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. (' I = It 1?( Ic ' i. Iii MAY 12 200r) U it uUI_? p r?? & O bi=LUFtv11rTJT ?v(:? 4 Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevalbi??'Proe?t? ?Gity..ofl?ra?ter t? I I ? R 0 it ( {f( it, 1 MAY 1 2 2001) ?i ? ' L? F?,ivN1N - `? , . G & DLENT.c,V(,5 LpF?W ER CITYOFCIV6-p M Flexible Development Application Section D General Application Criteria The proposed redevelopment site currently consists of a number of residential structures that have been converted for use as short-term, transient residential rental (weekly and monthly). The surrounding development includes high quality single-family residential, professional office, retail uses, and the Pinellas Trail. The proposed development would consist of 45 high quality, urban scale town home units on approximately 2.6 acres. The anticipated price points are from the low $200,000s to the low $300,000s and will target mid to upper income professional that desire a more urban lifestyle. The land plan is based on traditional neighborhood design principles: a tree-lined main boulevard with parallel parking, front doors on the public side of the unit with garages accessed from the rear of the unit, traditional Mediterranean architecture, European courtyards with fountains and trellises, etc. The scale and location of the project would accomplish a pedestrian based, urban scale, horizontal mixed-use neighborhood. The residents of the proposed development would find walking to work (Morton Plant, Druhills Professional Center, Pinellas County, downtown, etc.), shopping (Publix is one block to the north), places of worship (there are several churches within a ten minute walk), and recreation (the site abuts the Pinellas Trail) more convenient than driving, which would reduce the traffic impact to the local community. The project consists of seven three-story residential buildings of height and scale that is consistent with successful urban infill redevelopment. The height and scale will create an aesthetic focus for the project that would be integrated into the streetscape the City of Clearwater is planning along Ft. Harrison. Further, the scale of the project facilitates a maximization of open space and landscaping which enhances the value and character the project offers to the surrounding neighborhood. The density of the proposed project is within the allowable density provided by the underlying land-use and the type of density that we are proposing would maximize green space. As mentioned above, the character of the project would be defined by the timeless Mediterranean-Mizner architectural vernacular that has been so well received by the surrounding neighborhood. 2. All adjacent properties are currently developed and the proposed development will not be detrimental to their redevelopment, but may encourage reinvestment in the area. While the proposed development is based on an urban scale, the development will not encroach on the adjacent properties' future development rights. The project is setback sufficiently to enable the public to view the adjacent uses. In fact, the proposed front yard setback to the building is 1 Oft., which is significantly greater than the fi•ont setback for most of the existing buildings along that part of Ft. Harrison. There are no vertical encroachments that would block views of existing or proposed improvements. The surrounding properties will be able to continue to operate in their current capacity, or redevelop with uses provided for by the underlying zoning or land-use without adverse impact from the proposed townhouse development. The impact on adjacent retail properties will be positive because of the additional consumers and discretionary income this development will bring to those businesses. For adjacent properties that are non-commercial, their value again should significantly increase because the proposed development will be a significant upgrade over what currently exists. The proposed townhouse development will not create any hazardous conditions that would threaten the public safety. Appropriate lighting will be included in the site design to provide for safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 4. The proposed project is a pedestrian friendly, urban infill residential community that is intended to provide the residents with choices in modes of transportation. The project is located within blocks of shopping (the Publix shopping center), employment centers including Morton Plant Hospital, the Clearwater CBD, Pinellas County municipal services and others, and amenities such as the Pinellas Trail and parks, all of which are more conveniently accessed via walking or biking than driving. 5. The surrounding community is characterized by a mix of quality vintage residential development, new residential and commercial investment, and under-utilized properties that are primed for redevelopment. The proposed development is consistent with these mix of uses and will assuredly upgrade the character of the neighborhood. Much of the vintage and new development incorporates a Mediterranean vernacular which is consistent with the architectural style of the proposed project. 6. The design of the proposed project maximizes the character of the community. The units that front Ft. Harrison will create a streetscape consistent with the vision for the Ft. Harrison improvements. The front doors will address the community instead turning its back to it. The street tree program, landscaping, and hardscape features will soften the presentation of the improvements, creating a very desirable frontage along Ft. Harrison. Time- tested features that are evident in historic townhome developments in places like old town Alexandria, Boston, and San Fransiesco will be incorporated here. The interior boulevard would create a vastly improved view corridor over what is currently in place. Developed for residential use, the acoustic and olfactory effects on adjacent properties would be minimized. ' MAY 12 2001, L (? ?i Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria 1. The use and density (intensity) of the proposed development is consistent with the current land use. To achieve a proper urban scale and massing desired by both the applicant and the City, front and side yard setbacks need to be aggressive (10 foot front, 5.5 foot side, and 5 foot rear setbacks). That said, the proposed setbacks are consistent with or greater than some of the existing improvements, and are consistent with the setbacks of the surrounding uses, but require a flexible consideration for redevelopment. To help mitigate the potential effects of the small side setbacks, a six foot masonry wall with a decorative cap will be constructed along the north and southern property boundaries. The majority of the proposed development will consist of three- story structure (certain architectural embellishments will exceed the tluuee story height), which will be less than the 50ft allowed by the commercial/office zoning designation. 2. The existing improvements are utilized for weekly and monthly rentals to a lower/middle income target market. Residents are transient by nature and therefore do not have time to plant roots and develop a sense of ownership and belonging to the neighborhood community. Furthennore, the current improvements were not developed with a cohesive land plan and consistent architectural style and quality. The proposed redevelopment will be for-sale housing consisting of residents with an ownership stake in their house and in their community. The quality of the land plan and architectural construction (the units will be concrete construction) will be an aesthetic upgrade to the neighborhood. This development will also add discretionary income to the immediate market area of retail proprietors, thereby increasing the value of their businesses. Employers in the area will also benefit because providing upscale urban housing within walking distance of their offices will increase their ability to attract stable employees. The development may also provide a catalyst to redevelop and improve some of the surrounding under utilized uses. 3. Townhouse development is a permitted use within the City of Clearwater. 4. There is a mixture of uses in the immediate vicinity of the proposed residential development, including professional office, commercial, recreational, and single-family residential. The proposed development is consistent with these mixed uses and will assuredly upgrade the character of the neighborhood. The proposed townhouse community is highly compatible with the adjacent uses, as it will provide a horizontally mixed-use neighborhood that will enable the residents to live, work, shop, and play in a pedestrian environment. We have been working with the City of Clearwater Economic Development staff for over two years trying to bring infill residential development to the Downtown Clearwater area. There are very few (if any) vacant sites in the MAY 2 200 • r urban core of Downtown Clearwater that are marketable for upscale residential. The proposed site, while not vacant, is the only site that we have been able to identify that would accommodate the proposed development in an economically feasible manner 6. The proposed property is currently improved with a combination of single family and multifamily dwelling units that have been converted for use as a short-term residential rental property. While the quality of the existing improvements is fair and the property managers are diligent about maintaining the property, the current improvements are clearly not the highest and best use for the property. The proposed development will drastically upgrade the presentation and value of the property. Further, the new investment in the community will likely create the impetus for additional reinvestment and redevelopment along the Ft. Harrison corridor, which will further enhance the community value. 7. The form and function of the proposed development is to create a pedestrian oriented residential community that is able to integrate into and take full advantage of the services and amenities that the surrounding neighborhood has to offer. The project creates a presence by addressing the community with stoops and front doors instead of garage doors and utility services. The design minimizes the vehicular impact by placing the garages on the interior of the site. The project creates a venue to establish the sense of neighborhood though the use of community open space. The project is located such that the residents will be able to choose their mode of transportation as they shop, work, and play, which will reduce the impact on the existing infrastructure. The proposed lot sizes, setbacks, building heights, and parking design are the liallmark of successful urban redevelopment. The only flexibility that we are seeking is in the setbacks. The lot sizes, height, and parking requirements are all within the standards for multifamily residential development. The front setback conveys the benefits of the architectural elements and scale of the project to the community and allow it to be integrated into the Ft. Harrison streetscape that result in the creation of a timeless sense of place. We desire a front building setback of l Oft. This is in concert with our desire for the buildings along Ft. Harrison to engage Ft. Harrison and not turn its backs to it. At the same time, the use of private elevated stoops, retaining walls, opaque fences, and landscaping within the 1Oft setback will create a needed sense of privacy and separation from the street. Side and rear building setbacks will be approximately 5.5ft in some areas, but will be mitigated with decorated masonry walls and landscaping. The lot sizes provide the ability to cluster the density in a manner that provides higher impact common area space (such as courtyards, fountains, trellises, etc.) for the community interaction and enjoyment. The proposed on-site parking design will fully meet the needs of the community while creating an interior streetscape. MAY 12 2004 -17 Ct k 'y U'r C, i t2i . - I I I . 0 0 9. The parking requirements will be completely fulfilled on-site. Each unit will have a private two-car garage. In addition, there are 14 additional guest parking spaces and 58 frill-length driveway spaces behind the garages. The project contains 3.6 spaces per unit. 10. Not applicable. MAY -11 2 1001; a ?! 1 ,, E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL FIMUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ,W SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; 09 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; 14 LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; 14 PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (i.e. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); 14 COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; Include floor plates on multi-story buildings; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; (' Note: Per Section 3-911, all utilities shall be located/relocated underground) All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; - Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); - Location of all landscape material; - Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; - Location of all onsite and off site storm-water management facilities; - Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and - Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; _ Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses _ D FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; i - _ Off site elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; MAY 12 2004 All open space areas; _ --J Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); --- _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); , - _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMII4WL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A;' R LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/Z X 11), in color. IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. Dd BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials X REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ! !' AWAY ? 2 2004 j! Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project City of Clearwater - ._._..._._..___? .._...___...._.?...?._?._._......?.?..._........?.._._ K•, °r;}t I/'O?"U:'60 iPAP?& ST6..6D">;'': (?e4w 4•-29:2.A.13 and 4-801.C) 0 Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. rrip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. S6GNA"6°URE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. S Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn o and subscribed before me this ZZ day of A.D. 20C, to me and/or by who is personally _known has produc5o. as off. :'. t,n :? Notary Public - Stag of Florida iS i ; i • ` FBy Comm. Fxpirrs Apr 29, 2005 Y Comrnissian # OD021203 !?. My commis4oq exbires: MAY ? 2 200 Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater M. AFFIDAVITTO AUTHORIZE AM-NT: Robb-rtt Resnik (Names of ALL property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Set- attached "Legal Description - Robert Resnik" 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project consisting of 45 townhomes and associated improvements. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Scott Doster and Greg Iglehart Ed Armstrong as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; ) 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true an correct. / Property O 13 r) Owner roperry uwner rropeny uwner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 1 n C111 day of i•r?.; ;? % c-. personally appeared /-%. o -_ 4 A e.d- !, r" ? ,i i'lc who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ? A/ My Commission Expires: "" iQATHINA PATEL Notary Public ,?r° _ .`? Notary Pubis -State of Florists Commission # DD213820 8mXW By Nafiono1 NokNvAt! . -i Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Protect- Citv of Clearwater • "Legal Description - Robert Resnik" PARCEL III BEGIN AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 29 OF THE PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF GRANTOR (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY) AND GO IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 32 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ACROSS THE SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 33 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION, ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 28 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION, ACROSS SAID ABANDONED R!(,:,-HT- OF WAY, TO THE SCL'- -i'vVtS i CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 29 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (THE ABOVE IS A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF VJAY OVER AND ACROSS JASMINE WAY). TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 32 AND 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 33, RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JASMINE WAY (VACATED PER O.R. BOOK 957, PAGE 192) ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEG. 52'04" EAST, 61.24 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, SAID BLOCK 32; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG. 0011" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT -1, 135 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 52'03" WEST, 61.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG. 01'08" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAME, 135 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF THE ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 28 AND 29, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE WESTERLY 7.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 135.12 FEET OF THE VACATED (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD) RIGHT OF WAY. OR "L, ?I ? - I ; ' ; ? MAY ? 2 20019, M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE ONT: E. JOYLN, INC. I (Names of ALL property owners on deed -please PRINT full names 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Lots 4 5 6, 7, and 8, Block28 MAGNOLIA PARK, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project consisting of 45 townhomes and associated improvements. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Scott Doster and Greg Iglehart Ed Armstrong as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. > Property Owner Property Property Owner roperty Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ?E3(ore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the h s of the State of Florida, on this `. day of ?- r7 personally appeared ` )tiff's I / who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed My Commission Expires: q??Yr Joyce Ruggiero tr MY COMMISSION # DD223939 EXPIRES x June 18, 2007 'fSfi ` BONDEDTNRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE INC ! t 1 Pots ry'Publlc i/ ..-. '- Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater IM. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AWNT: Craig J. Murtha and Craig J. Murtha Land Trust Agreement (Names of ALL property owners on deed - please PRINT full names 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Lots 1, 2, 9, 10, and 11, Block 33 MAGNOLIA PARK,according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive INfill Redevelopment project consisting of 45 townhomes and associated improvements. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Ed Armstrona Scott Doster and Greg Iglehart as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Pr wner Property Owner rrvperty owner rropeny owner Trustee of the Magnolia STATE OF' FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of personally appeared ,r-? who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of'the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: ROBERT B GROSS -Notary Public - Stole of Florlcta aNq 'MVC Xnn'ftn8q-vze"ry22.20W COMMISsIon # DD 2) 5078 1-Z (f Notary Publi Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater Exhibit "A" Legal Descriptions and Parcel Numbers Ejoyln Inc. - Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Magnolia Park, as per Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel Numbers: 15/29/15/54450/028/0040, 15/29/15/54450/028/0050, 15/29/15/54450/028/0060, 15/29/15/54450/028/0070 Craig Murtha - Lot 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, Block 33, Magnolia Park. As per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida Parcel Numbers: 15/29/15/54450/033/0110, 15/29/15/54450/033/0100, 15/29/15/54450/033/0090, 15/29/1.5/54450/033/0010, 15/29/15/54450/033/0020 Robert Resnik - Begin at the point of intersection of the South boundary of Block 29 of the Plat of Magnolia Park, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and the East right-of-way line of the abandoned right of way of Grantor (formerly the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right of way) and go in a Southerly direction along said East right-of-way line, to the Northwest corner of Block 32 of said Plat of Magnolia Park; thence in a Westerly direction across the said abandoned right of way of Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, to the Northeast corner of Block 33 of said Plat of Magnolia Park; thence in a Northerly direction, along the West right-of-way line of the abandoned right of way to the Southeast corner of Block 28 of said Plat of Magnolia Park; thence in an Easterly direction, across abandoned right of way, to the Southwest corner of said Block 29 and the Point of Beginning. (The above is a 60 foot right of way over and across Jasmine Way). AND The Northerly half of that certain parcel lying between. Blocks 32 and 33, Magnolia Park, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 33, running thence along the South right of way line of Jasmine Way (vacated per O.R. Book 957, Page 192) on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 52 minutes 04 seconds East, 61.24 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 1, said Block 32; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 11 seconds West, along the West line of said Lot 1, 135 feet to the Southwest conger of said Lot 1; thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 03 seconds West, 61.15 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 9; thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 08 seconds West, along the East line of same, 135 feet to the Point of Beginning. AND That certain parcel of the Atlantic Coastline Railroad right of way lying between Blocks 28 and 29, Magnolia Park, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Less the Westerly 7.0 feet of the North 135.12 feet of the vacated (fonnerly the Atlantic Coastline Railroad) right of way. Parcel Number : 16/29/15/00000/440/0100 MAY 12 2001) . I I. . 0 0 Exhibit "B" Description of Request The proposed development is an urban scale, pedestrian friendly 45-unit townhouse community. This is an acceptable use under the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project designation of the Commercial and Office Flexible Development Standards. The front portion of the site is currently zoned commercial and the back portion is zoned office. The development standards do not set a minimum or maximum criteria for the front, side, and rear setbacks, building height, parcel dimensions, and parking as a basis to evaluate this request against. As such the following requests are made for the City's consideration, and are necessary for the feasibility of the development and to achieve the scale and character desired in an urban setting: Front Setback - 10' to the structure of the building, 45' to paver drive isle. (The front elevation will have porticos that will protrude no more that three feet into the setback.) This is consistent with the setbacks of existing properties along this stretch of Ft. Harrison, where some setbacks are zero. Side Setback - 5'-11" to the building, 3' to the paver drive isle on the south side, and 5'- 3" to the building, 3' to the paver drive isle on the north side of the commercial property. 7'-6" to the building, 4' to the paver drive isle on the south side and 7'-5" to the building, 6' to the paver drive isle on the north side of the office property. Back Setback - 5'6" to the building structure, 48' to paver drive isle. Building Height - 3 stories, 36'-.7 '`/4" to the mid point of the roof for building types 1, 3,4, and 5, and 36'-11 3/4" to the mid point of the roof for building type 2. Lot Area and Width - the site is approximately 2.6 acres with approximately 280' of frontage on Ft. Harrison. The parcel will be subdivided through the plat process to provide fee simple ownership. Parking - Each unit will have a two-car garage. In addition there are an additional 72 driveway and parallel spaces. The parking ratio is approximately 3.6 spaces per unit. The project will have 24" concrete with stucco retaining wall located 2' from the front property line to provide a slightly elevated front yard for the units that face Ft. Harrison. This will allow the project to engage the street, but at the same time, provide a sense of separation and privacy to the homeowner. The project will have a stucco site wall six feet in height along the northern and southern property lines. MAY 12 PL1-2c4° C0003 F LE H CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL R` PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 9??ArEp??O MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"" FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME Crcadg Murtha, Ejoyln Inc., Robert Resnik ADDRESS 504 Jasmine Way PHONE NUMBER APPLICANT'S NAME ADDRESS 727.447.2727 FAX NUMBER : 727.447.2727 GWI INVESTMENTS INC. 2510 W Prospect Road, Tampa, FL 33609 PHONE NUMBER 813.258.5240 FAX NUMBER : 8 1 3. 2 5 8. 5 2 41 ----------------------------------- ------------------------------- AGENT NAME Scott Doster, Greg Iglehart, Ed Armstrong 2510 W Prospect Road, Tampa, FL 33609 PHONE NUMBER 813.258.5240 FAX NUMBER 813.258.5241 I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledg . by who is personally known to STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELL?A.?S- ?j??``;;or-?n to ar i subscribed before me this ,3- ay of 1_?ISA!yC_--Y-j? -------- A.D.Z01 to me and/or `,111111AII MARIA FO US e r s roduced Notary Public - Sta of Florida as i cation. Nh Comm Expires pr 29, 2005 Commission # 021203 commission Ten (10) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; Page I DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT STREETS RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY. Page 2 lie - APR 0 52009 f Dil • • SEAIk??? CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 9y'ATEP??' MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2 FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL OF FINAL PLAT INSTRUCTIONS The final plat shall be suitable for recording at the office of the clerk of the circuit court. It shall be prepared and sealed buy a land surveyor registered by the state and shall conform with the requirements of Florida Statute, Chapter 177, and the requirements of this subsection. It shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals 50 feet or other scale determined appropriate by the city engineer. The overall sheet size of the plat shall be consistent with the standards established by the clerk of the circuit court for recording. Each sheet shall be provided with a one-inch margin on each of three sides and a three-inch margin on the left side of the plat for binding purposes. Eighteen (18) copies of the Final Plat must be submitted. ALL FINAL PLATS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: NAME OF PLAT; LOCATION OF THE PLAT BY U.S. SURVEY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE, COUNTY AND STATE; NAMES OF EXISTING STREETS ABUTTING RO GIVING ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT; ALL PLAT BOUNDARIES BASED ON AN ACCURATE TRANSVERSE, WITH ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS SHOWN. ERROR OF ENCLOSURE OF SUCH BOUNDARY SURVEY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT FOR EACH 10,000 FEET OF PERIMETER SURVEY; ALL BLOCKS, LOTS, STREETS, CROSSWALKS, EASEMENTS AND WATERWAYS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PLAT, ALL OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS GIVEN AND ALL RADII, INTERNAL ANGLES, BEARINGS, POINTS OF CURVATURE, TANGENTS AND LENGTHS OF ALL CURVES, SO THAT NO DIMENSIONS OR DATA ARE MISSING WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF ANY OF THE CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES OF BLOCKS, LOTS OR STREETS, AS LISTED ABOVE. WHEN ANY LOT OR PORTION OF THE PLAT IS BOUNDED BY AN IRREGULAR LINE, THE MAJOR PORTION OF THAT LOT OR PLAT SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A WITNESS LINE SHOWING COMPLETE DATA, WITH DISTANCES ALONG SUCH LINES EXTENDED BEYOND THE ENCLOSURE TO THE IRREGULAR BOUNDARY SHOWN WITH AS MUCH CERTAINTY AS CAN BE DETERMINED OR AS "MORE OR LESS", IF VARIABLE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT. TRUE ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHALL BE DRAWN TO THE NEAREST ESTABLISHED OFFICIAL MONUMENTS, NOT LESS THAN THREE OF WHICH SHALL BE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT. THE INTENDED USE OF ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED. CURVILINEAR LOTS SHALL SHOW ARC DISTANCES, AND RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING. RADIAL LINES SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED. DIRECTION OF NONRADIAL LINES SHALL BE INDICATED; SUFFICIENT ANGLES AND BEARINGS SHALL IDENTIFY THE DIRECTION OF ALL LINES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO THE NEAREST SECOND; Page 3 APR 0 5 2004 ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINES SHALL BE SHOWN WITH DISTANCES, ANGLES, BEARINGS OR AZIMUTH, POINTS OF CURVATURE, POINTS OF TANGENCY, POINTS OF REVERSE CURVATURE, POINTS OF COMPOUND CURVATURE, ARC DISTANCE, CENTRAL ANGLES, TANGENTS, RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING OR AZIMUTH, OR BOTH ALL EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES OR UTILITIES, AND ANY LIMITATIONS OF SUCH EASEMENTS; ALL LOT NUMBERS AND LINES. LOT LINES SHALL BE MARKED WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS OF FEET, AND BEARINGS OR ANGLES TO STREET LINES; ACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY AREA TO BE DEDICATED OR RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE WITH THE PURPOSE INDICATED THEREON; TITLE, DATE OF SURVEY, GRAPHIC SCALE OF MAP AND NORTH ARROW. THE BEARING OR AZIMUTH REFERENCE SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT IN THE NOTES OR LEGEND; PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE SATE OF FLORIDA; EACH PLAT SHALL SHOW A DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS PLATTED, AND THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE THE SAME IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATION. THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE SO COMPLETE THAT FROM IT, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE PLAT, THE STARTING POINT AND BOUNDARY CAN BE DETERMINED; THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND THE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SEAL; ALL SECTION LINES AND QUARTER SECTION LINES OCCURRING IN THE MAP OR PLAT SHALL BE INDICATED BY LINES DRAWN UPON THE MAP OR PLAT, WITH APPROPRIATE WORDS AND FIGURES. IF THE DESCRIPTION IS BY METES AND BOUNDS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING SHALL BE INDICATED, TOGETHER WITH ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES OF THE BOUNDARY LINES. IF THE PLATTED LANDS ARE IN A LAND GRANT OR ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT SURVEYS, THEN THE BOUNDARIES ARE TO BE DEFINED BY METES AND BOUNDS AND COURSES. THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE TIED TO THE NEAREST GOVERNMENT CORNER OF OTHER RECORDED AND WELL-ESTABLISHED CORNER; ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAT TITLE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE OR, IF UNPLATTED, LAND SHALL BE SO DESIGNED. IF THE AREA PLATTED IS A REPLATTING OF A PART OR THE WHOLE OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT, SUFFICIENT TIES SHALL BE SHOWN TO CONTROLLING LINES APPEARING ON THE EARLIER PLAT TO PERMIT AN OVERLAY TO BE MADE AND REFERENCE TO THE REPLATTING SHALL BE STATED AS A SUBTITLE FOLLOWING THE NAME OF THE PLAT WHEREVER IT APPEARS ON THE PLAT; ALL LOTS SHALL BE NUMBERED EITHER BY PROGRESSIVE NUMBERS OR, IF IN BLOCKS, PROGRESSIVELY NUMBERED OR LETTERED IN EACH BLOCK, EXCEPT THAT BLOCKS IN NUMBER ADDITIONS BEARING THE SAME NAME MAY BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY THROUGHOUT THE SEVERAL ADDITIONS; PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PARCELS SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED; ALL INTERIOR EXCEPTED PARCELS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND LABELED "NOT A PART OF THIS PLAT"; THE PURPOSE OF ALL AREAS DEDICATED MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED OR STATED ON THE PLAT; WHEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SHOW CURVE DETAIL INFORMATION ON THE MAP, A TABULAR FORM MAY BE USED. Page 4 APR 0 5 2004 ? u` 0 0 THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL PLAT: A TITLE OPINION OF AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE SATE OR A CERTIFICATION BY AN ABSTRACTOR OR A TITLE COMPANY STATING THAT THE COURT RECORDS IDENTIFY THAT THE TITLE TO THE LAND AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAT IS IN THE NAME OF THE PERSON EXECUTING THE DEDICATION. IN ADDITION, A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CONSENT TO PLATTING OF LANDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE SHALL BE FILED TOGETHER WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR EACH PERSON OR CORPORATION HOLDING A MORTGAGE ON ALL LAND INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, WHERE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT SIGNED THE FINAL PLAT. THE TITLE OPINION OR CERTIFICATION SHALL SHOW ALL MORTGAGES NOT SATISFIED OR RELEASED OF RECORD NOR OTHER WISE TERMINATED BY LAW; CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THAT THE PLAT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT ALL THE NECESSARY SURVEY MONUMENTS, LOT SIZES AND LOT DIMENSIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN THEREON, AND THAT THE PLAT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 AND THIS DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPRESSED ON THE PLAT AND AFFIXED THERETO SHALL BE THE PERSONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE TO THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR INCLUDING THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE SURVEYOR, BY WHOM OR UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION THE PLAT WAS PREPARED; A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PLATTED LANDS. HOWEVER, A NEW BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR A REPLAT IS REQUIRED ONLY WHEN THE REPLAT AFFECTS ANY BOUNDARY OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED PROPERTY OR WHEN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE LANDS TO BE REPLATTED OR ADJOINING LANDS. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED AND PREPARED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PRECEDING THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PLAT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT RESTRICT A LEGAL ENTITY FROM EMPLOYING ONE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PERFORM AND PREPARE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PREPARE THE PLAT, EXCEPT THAT BOTH THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND THE PLAT MUST BE UNDER THE SAME LEGAL ENTITY; CERTIFICATION THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID; EVERY PLAT OF A SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM FILED FOR RECORD SHALL INCLUDE ANY REQUIRED DEDICATION BY THE APPLICANT. THE DEDICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY ALL OWNERS HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND BEING PLATTED, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED. ALL MORTGAGEES HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND PLATTED SHALL EXECUTE, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED, EITHER THE DEDICATION CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OR IN A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT JOINING THE RATIFICATION OF THE PLAT AND ALL DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS THEREON IN THE FORM OF A CONSENT TO PLAT FROM ALL MORTGAGE INTERESTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEN A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND HAS BEEN PLATTED AND A PLAT THEREOF BEARING THE DEDICATION EXECUTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY HAS BEEN SECURED AND RECORDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DIVISION, ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC AREAS SHOWN ON SUCH PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE BEEN DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREON, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SEPARATE ACTION BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION TO FORMALLY ACCEPT SUCH OFFERS OF DEDICATION; ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRIVATE RESTRICTION AND TRUSTEESHIPS AND THEIR PERIODS OF EXISTENCE SHALL BE FILED AS A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REFERENCE TO SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL BE NOTED ON THE FINAL PLAT; Page 5 APR 0 5 2004 AFTER A FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED, THREE PRINTS OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE BEE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE SUCH PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE: UNLESS ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED, AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY EVERY PLAT WHICH IS TO BE RECORDED TO ENSURE THE ACTUAL SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN NOT MORE THAN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE RECORDING, OR ONE YEAR IF SIDEWALKS ARE THE ONLY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING THE DATE OF RECORDING. AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED IF THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES IT APPROPRIATE AND MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME IN PROPORTION TO THE WORK COMPLETED, AND MAY TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY; CASH, TO BE HELD IN A SEPARATE ESCROW ACCOUNT BY THE CITY; OR AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT WRITTEN BY A BANK CHARTERED BY THE SATE, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE UNITED STATES IF THE BANK IS AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER THINGS, AN EXPIRATION DATE NOT EARLIER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE; A PROVISION REQUIRING THE ISSUER OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT TO GIVE AT LEAST 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OR RENEWAL OF THE LETTER; AND A PROVISION THAT THE LETTER IS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQUALING ITS ORIGINAL TERM OF THE REQUIRED NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN; OR A SURETY BOND ISSUED BY A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE. THE SURETY BOND SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE PROVISION REQUIRED FOR LETTERS OF CREDIT. S: application forms/development review/plat approval application.doc Page 6 _2 1_2 i APR 0- 2004 s- ilk • O • Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue y Clearwater Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION O SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / ---------- ------------- SOUTH: / ---------- ------------ WEST: ----------- / ------------- EAST: / COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001) APPLICANTNAME: GWI Investments, Inc. -------------------------------------- MAILING ADDRESS: 2510 _ W _ PrOS_peC t-_ Qa 5-,.__-Tampa-,__FL_- 3-3 6 Q9 ------------------------------------ PHONE NUMBER: 813.258.5240 FAX NUMBER: 81 3 . 258. 5241 PROPERTY OWNER(S): ---zai.-g--.Murtha-,---E]..QYLn,-- TnC'..-,.--Robsnt--Resnik---------------------- (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) Scott Doster_--Gre MAILING ADDRESS: 2510 W Prospect Road, Tampa, FL 33609 PHONE NUMBER: 813.258.5240 FAX NUMBER: 81 3.258.5241 ------------------- The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sections/elevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet: 1. Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on_the.p.arc, [prop osed-#flr:-the; ?lopment. C (l'? See Attached. ! I i 1 i MAI U I r-uu-r it U I I It 0 0 OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. MAY 1 2 - - 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Q t t tn1ST6t-? try ?tf Lta a cal i eye r? ?a ?Q_c 2_ T T o e Please return checklist for review and verification. Date: ---? - -a- , - ------- ------- US of Florida pr 29, 2005 021203 gRViRg (Signature of applicant) S: application forms/development review/comprehensive landscape program application.doc k, • • 1. a. The proposed development consists of 45 high-quality, urban scale town house units. The land plan is based on traditional neighborhood principles, which include traditional Mediterranean architecture, front doors that address the community, parallel parking on the boulevards, and public courtyards. The landscape plan is instrumental in conveying the site plan principles. Ft. Harrison and Jasmine Way will have canopy street trees that will provide a separation between the vehicular and pedestrian uses while providing shade and wild life habitat. A 24-inch retaining wall along Ft. Harrison will provide an elevated front yard that will be densely planted with accent trees and shrubs to provide a sense of separation between the public and private space. The mid-height accent trees will provide vertical relief along the building elevation. A six-foot height concrete and stucco wall with a decorative cap is proposed along the north and south property line. The wall will be planted with a combination of canopy trees and mid-height accent trees to provide a visual buffer. The courtyards include Washington Palms, Magnolias, and shrubs in a design to promote the structure of the park and again to provide a sense of separation between the public and private spaces. Coconut palms will be planted around the amenity area to provide a focal accent along the main view corridor. The landscape islands in the paver drive isles will have mid-height accent trees to provide shade and architectural relief along the back side of the buildings. b. The proposed landscape plan far surpasses the minimum code requirements in all cases except for the location of the shade trees and the depth of the landscape buffers. In orderto accomplish the desired street tree program, the shade trees will be located within 5' of the impervious surfaces, however, the 4" caliper live oaks at a 25' spacing exceed the 2.5" caliper at 25' spacing requirement. We have had great response to street tree programs that we have employed on other traditional style projects and feel that the street trees will enhance the City's beautification efforts along Ft. Harrison. It was necessary to reduce the landscape buffer along the perimeter of the project to create the desired urban scale and achieve the proposed site plan. The reduction of the landscape buffer along Ft. Harrison enhances the integration of the proposed development with the community and is adequately compensated by the intensity of the proposed landscape design. The proposed site wall and the intense landscaping along the wall mitigate the reduction in the landscape buffers on the north, south, and east sides of,_--- the proposed development. 2. The project will not include any type of commercial lighting. The only lighting cS that will be employed on the site will be vehicular and pedestrian oriented lighting to r- l promote a safe environment. c•; 3. The proposed landscape material and intensity of planting will significantly a enhance the character of the community. The plant materials include the preferred Live Oak for shade, and a wide variety of flowering accent trees including Little Gem Magnolia, Crape Myrtle, Holly, Golden Shower, and Ligustrum. Palm trees will be used t-? to provide vertical structure in the courtyards and accents at the amenity. r- 4. The proposed landscape plan will substantially enhance the proposed development plan, which will provide a very positive impact to the property value in the vicinity, especially over what currently exists. 5. The City has proposed a street beatification effort along Ft. Harrison as one of the main corridors into the downtown area. The design and intensity of the proposed landscape plan will complement the City's efforts and is consistent with the type of urban residential development the city has been promoting. t Q E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL UIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) 6 SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; IF L TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; 10' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (i.e. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Cr_' GRADING PLAN, as applicable; LEI' PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; Include floor plates on multi-story buildings; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; _ Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; (' Note: Per Section 3-911, all utilities shall be located/relocated underground) _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; _ Location of all landscape material; Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks 0/SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: - Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; _ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: O V _ One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ; P _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; C/? t i `1 All open space areas; Appp f 1? 0' ;/ 6?? f 4 _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); j _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); F'll.iA1VNIIdG b, I"' • . Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); (;{Ty('v.;;t.AiJ'•':1it{ _ Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater r 'k 0 Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue uearwater Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan CASE #: ---------------- DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / --------- ------------- SOUTH: / ---------- ------------ WEST: / ----------- ---- EAST: / COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001) APPLICANT NAME: __ GWI__Investments, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 2510--W _ ProS--2 Ct-Ro-a- f--T Lmp-&,.__FIL_3-3 6 Q9 _ ----- ----------- -- PHONE NUMBER: 81 3 .258. 5240 FAX NUMBER: 81 3 .258.5241 PROPERTY OWNER(S): _ ar-ai-g?_M-ur'tha_F__E3.-o-yli -,-._Znr--,-__Robsnt-_Resnik----------------------- (Must include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) _Scott DOS ter R__GrecrICrleha.rt,,-__Ed__& m-S t= ag - - -__---- MAILING ADDRESS: - --- 251 - 0 W Prospect Road, Tampa, FL 33609 ------------------------------------------------ 813.258.5240 81 3 258. 5241 PHONE NUMBER: --------------------------- FAX NUMBER: ------.--------------- The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sectionslelevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet: 1. Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. See Attached. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Jf ` 4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. `@. t,U rIJSC-U-? GU6-2'' ?u11e-er-Q_ ?.¢ T?- ? ( %-10 , 15- * ,5 1 st-a" a,f- lktorct', 2oo4,6y 7? U??re- Please return checklist for review and verification. Date: _ ? Sea '7'r o s T?,e ?; c MARIA FOGUS 'c Notary Public - State of Florida MY Comm. Expires Apr 28, 2005 Commission # DD021203 ----------------------- (Signature of applicant) S: application form sldevelopment review/comprehensive landscape program application.doc 43 dearvater • Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 K"A E? ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 1*1,lifl 6 "f ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site pfMANNING DEPARTO ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CITY O C.LEARV A CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: TONING DISTRICT: AND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: NT EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLANS SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 10-10-2003) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- use additional sheets as necessary A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: GWI Investments, Inc MAILING ADDRESS: 2510 W. Prospect Road, Tampa, FL 33629 E-MAIL ADDRESS: gwi ggy @ tampabay . rr. COMPHONE NUMBER: 813.258.5240 CELL NUMBER: 813.732.6794 FAX NUMBER: 81 3 . 528. 5241 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Craig Murtha, Ej oyln, Inc., Robert Resnik (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME(S): Greg Iglehart, Scott Doster, Ed Armstrong MAILING ADDRESS: 2510 W. Prospect Road, Tampa, FL 33629 E-MAIL ADDRESS: gwiggy@tampabay.rr.com PHONE NUMBER: 81 3.258.5240 CELL NUMBER: 813,732,6794 FAX NUMBER: 81 3 . 258.5241 B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 504 Jasmine Way LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A"- (if not listed here, please pole thq locatwn oPhis document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See Exhibit A PARCEL SIZE: 2.6 Acres (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE AND SIZE: 45 Townhome Residences (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Exhibit "B" Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRAiv FER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO -X- (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Section 4-202.A) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attached Response 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ? 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater 2. The development of the parcel proposed iu development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater 0 0 Flexible Development Application Section D General Application Criteria 1. The proposed redevelopment site currently consists of a number of residential structures that have been converted for use as short-term, transient residential rental (weekly and monthly). The surrounding development includes high quality single-family residential, professional office, retail uses, and the Pinellas Trail. The proposed development would consist of 45 high quality, urban scale town home units on approximately 2.6 acres. The anticipated price points are from the low $200,000s to the low $300,000s and will target mid to upper income professional that desire a more urban lifestyle. The land plan is based on traditional neighborhood design principles: a tree-lined main boulevard with parallel parking, front doors on the public side of the unit with garages accessed from the rear of the unit, traditional Mediterranean architecture, European courtyards with fountains and trellises, etc. The scale and location of the project would accomplish a pedestrian based, urban scale, horizontal mixed-use neighborhood. The residents of the proposed development would find walking to work (Morton Plant, Druhills Professional Center, Pinellas County, downtown, etc.), shopping (Publix is one block to the north), places of worship (there are several churches within a ten minute walk), and recreation (the site abuts the Pinellas Trail) more convenient than driving, which would reduce the traffic impact to the local community. The project consists of seven three-story residential buildings of height and scale that is consistent with successful urban infill redevelopment. The height and scale will create an aesthetic focus for the project that would be integrated into the streetscape the City of Clearwater is planning along Ft. Harrison. Further, the scale of the project facilitates a maximization of open space and landscaping which enhances the value and character the project offers to the surrounding neighborhood. The density of the proposed project is within the allowable density provided by the underlying land-use and the type of density that we are proposing would maximize green space. As mentioned above, the character of the project would be defined by the timeless Mediterranean-Mizner architectural vernacular that has been so well received by the surrounding neighborhood. 2. All adjacent properties are currently developed and the proposed development will not be detrimental to their redevelopment, but may encourage reinvestment in the area. While the proposed development is based on an urban scale, the development will not encroach on the adjacent properties' future development rights. The project is setback sufficiently to enable the public to view the adjacent uses. In fact, the proposed front yard setback to the building is l Oft., which is significantly greater than the front setback for most of the existing buildings along that part of Ft. Harrison. There are no vertical encroachments that would block views of existing or proposed improvements. The surrounding properties will be able to continue to operate in their current capacity, or redevelop with uses provided for by the underlying zoning or land-use without adverse impact from the proposed townhouse development. The impact on adjacent retail properties will be positive because of the additional consumers and discretionary income this development will bring to those businesses. For adjacent properties that are non-commercial, their value again should significantly increase because the proposed development will be a significant upgrade over what currently exists. The proposed townhouse development will not create any hazardous conditions that would threaten the public safety. Appropriate lighting will be included in the site design to provide for safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic. 4. The proposed project is a pedestrian friendly, urban infill residential community that is intended to provide the residents with choices in modes of transportation. The project is located within blocks of shopping (the Publix shopping center), employment centers including Morton Plant Hospital, the Clearwater CBD, Pinellas County municipal services and others, and amenities such as the Pinellas Trail and parks, all of which are more conveniently accessed via walking or biking than driving. The surrounding community is characterized by a mix of quality vintage residential development, new residential and commercial investment, and under-utilized properties that are primed for redevelopment. The proposed development is consistent with these mix of uses and will assuredly upgrade the character of the neighborhood. Much of the vintage and new development incorporates a Mediterranean vernacular which is consistent with the architectural style of the proposed project. 6. The design of the proposed project maximizes the character of the community. The units that front Ft. Harrison will create a streetscape consistent with the vision for the Ft. Harrison improvements. The front doors will address the community instead turning its back to it. The street tree program, landscaping, and hardscape features will soften the presentation of the improvements, creating a very desirable frontage along Ft. Harrison. Time- tested features that are evident in historic townhome developments in places like old town Alexandria, Boston, and San Fransicsco will be incorporated here. The interior boulevard would create a vastly improved view corridor over what is currently in place. Developed for residential use, the acoustic and olfactory effects on adjacent properties would be minimized. 0 0 Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria 1. The use and density (intensity) of the proposed development is consistent with the current land use. To achieve a proper urban scale and massing desired by both the applicant and the City, front and side yard setbacks need to be aggressive (10 foot front, 5.5 foot side, and 5 foot rear setbacks). That said, the proposed setbacks are consistent with or greater than some of the existing improvements, and are consistent with the setbacks of the surrounding uses, but require a flexible consideration for redevelopment. To help mitigate the potential effects of the small side setbacks, a six foot masonry wall with a decorative cap will be constructed along the north and southern property boundaries. The majority of the proposed development will consist of three- story structure (certain architectural embellishments will exceed the three story height), which will be less than the 50ft allowed by the commercial/office zoning designation. 2. The existing improvements are utilized for weekly and monthly rentals to a lower/middle income target market. Residents are transient by nature and therefore do not have time to plant roots and develop a sense of ownership and belonging to the neighborhood community. Furthermore, the current improvements were not developed with a cohesive land plan and consistent architectural style and quality. The proposed redevelopment will be for-sale housing consisting of residents with an ownership stake in their house and in their community. The quality of the land plan and architectural construction (the units will be concrete construction) will be an aesthetic upgrade to the neighborhood. This development will also add discretionary income to the immediate market area of retail proprietors, thereby increasing the value of their businesses. Employers in the area will also benefit because providing upscale urban housing within walking distance of their offices will increase their ability to attract stable employees. The development may also provide a catalyst to redevelop and improve some of the surrounding under utilized uses. 3. Townhouse development is a permitted use within the City of Clearwater. 4. There is a mixture of uses in the immediate vicinity of the proposed residential development, including professional office, commercial, recreational, and single-family residential. The proposed development is consistent with these mixed uses and will assuredly upgrade the character of the neighborhood. The proposed townhouse community is highly compatible with the adjacent uses, as it will provide a horizontally mixed-use neighborhood that will enable the residents to live, work, shop, and play in a pedestrian environment. We have been working with the City of Clearwater Economic Development staff for over two years trying to bring infill residential development to the Downtown Clearwater area. There are very few (if any) vacant sites in the 0 0 urban core of Downtown Clearwater that are marketable for upscale residential. The proposed site, while not vacant, is the only site that we have been able to identify that would accommodate the proposed development in an economically feasible manner 6. The proposed property is currently improved with a combination of single family and multifamily dwelling units that have been converted for use as a short-term residential rental property. While the quality of the existing improvements is fair and the property managers are diligent about maintaining the property, the current improvements are clearly not the highest and best use for the property. The proposed development will drastically upgrade the presentation and value of the property. Further, the new investment in the community will likely create the impetus for additional reinvestment and redevelopment along the Ft. Harrison corridor, which will further enhance the community value. 7. The form and function of the proposed development is to create a pedestrian oriented residential community that is able to integrate into and take full advantage of the services and amenities that the surrounding neighborhood has to offer. The project creates a presence by addressing the community with stoops and front doors instead of garage doors and utility services. The design minimizes the vehicular impact by placing the garages on the interior of the site. The project creates a venue to establish the sense of neighborhood though the use of community open space. The project is located such that the residents will be able to choose their mode of transportation as they shop, work, and play, which will reduce the impact on the existing infrastructure. 8. The proposed lot sizes, setbacks, building heights, and parking design are the hallmark of successful urban redevelopment. The only flexibility that we are seeking is in the setbacks. The lot sizes, height, and parking requirements are all within the standards for multifamily residential development. The front setback conveys the benefits of the architectural elements and scale of the project to the community and allow it to be integrated into the Ft. Harrison streetscape that result in the creation of a timeless sense of place. We desire a front building setback of l Oft. This is in concert with our desire for the buildings along Ft. Harrison to engage Ft. Harrison and not turn its backs to it. At the same time, the use of private elevated stoops, retaining walls, opaque fences, and landscaping within the l Oft setback will create a needed sense of privacy and separation from the street. Side and rear building setbacks will be approximately 5.5ft in some areas, but will be mitigated with decorated masonry walls and landscaping. The lot sizes provide the ability to cluster the density in a manner that provides higher impact common area space (such as courtyards, fountains, trellises, etc.) for the community interaction and enjoyment. The proposed on-site parking design will fully meet the needs of the community while creating an interior streetscape. 9. The parking requirements will be completely fulfilled on-site. Each unit will have a private two-car garage. In addition, there are 14 additional guest parking spaces and 58 full-length driveway spaces behind the garages. The project contains 3.6 spaces per unit. 10. Not applicable. G. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTA17REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including dripline (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11), in color. ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for Level Two and Three applications) ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable H. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ? STORMWATER PLAN including the following requirements: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; - Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; - All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; - Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; - Stormwater calculations for attenuation and water quality; - Signature of Florida registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? COPY OF STATE AND COUNTY STORMWATER SYSTEM TIE-IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS, if applicable 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS/ Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Seeteo-202.A.13 and 4-801.0) ? Include as required if proposed development will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip General Manual. Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. I Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ,ti?,? Sworn o and subscribed before me this z day of A. D. 20 D 9? to me and/or by who is personally known has produce as identif ati n. .P MARIA FOGUS in Notary Public - State of Florida ?-' My Comm. Expires Apr 29, 2005 Commission 4 DD021203 Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater W MW M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGEN T: Robert Resnik (Names of ALL property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): See attached "Legal Description - Robert Resnik" 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project consisting of 45 townhomes and associated improvements. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Scott DOster and Greg Iglehart Ed Armstrong as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true an correct. Property O ner ` Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this a d day of Ha-,,r,4- , 2&v q personally appeared F/_ D ` 6 Q2 S n t' fc who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: Jr/a0 ?? " RMMA. MERL Nota Public . Pte`': Notary Pubic • State of Fbrldo •94Connl6sb b0%May2Q200D a CommNslon * DD213820 i 5: u'tanning Uepartmentwppucauon t-ormsiaevetopmenr reviemuomprenensive Irvin reaevetopment project application m-iU-2UU3.doc Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater 0 0 "Legal Description - Robert Resnik" PARCEL III BEGIN AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 29 OF THE PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF GRANTOR (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY) AND GO IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 32 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK.; THENCE IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ACROSS THE SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 33 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION, ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 28 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION, ACROSS SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF `AWAY, TO i"HE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 29 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (THE ABOVE IS A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY OVER AND ACROSS JASMINE WAY). TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 32 AND 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 33, RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JASMINE WAY (VACATED PER O.R. BOOK 957 PAGE 192) ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEG. 52'04" EAST, 61.24 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, SAID BLOCK 32; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG. 00'11" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1, 135 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 52'03" WEST, 61.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG. 01'08" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAME, 135 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF THE ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 28 AND 29, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE WESTERLY 7.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 135.12 FEET OF THE VACATED (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD) RIGHT OF WAY. M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AMT: E. JOYLN, INC. I (Names of ALL property owners on deed -please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Lots 4 5 6, 7, and 8, Block28 MAGNOLIA PARK, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment project consisting of 45 townhomes and associated improvements. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Scott Doster and Greg Iglehart Ed Armstrong as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property Owner Property Owner roperty Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS J ree me the undderrssi?n?e?, an officer duly commissione by the I s of the St to of Florida, on this ?fh day of personally appeared (y) (,2, - who having been first duly sworn 1LL?dJ?1? Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed My Commission Expires: U 7Vott3ryPublic by °99. z.. _ WCOMMISSION# DD223931 EXPIRES y )une 18,1007 BONDED THRUTROY FAIN INSURANCE INC • n Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater As M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE A 6R,- T: Craig J. Murtha and Craig J. Murtha, Trustee of the Magnolia Land Trust Agreement (Names of ALL property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Lots 1, 2, 9, 10, and 11, Block 33 MAGNOLIA PARK,according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive INfill Redevelopment project consisting of 45 townhomes and associated improvements. 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Scott Doster and Greg Iglehart Ed Armstrong as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 3. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 4. That the applicant acknowledges that all impact fees (parks and recreation, traffic, etc.) will be paid PRIOR to the issuance of a building permit, certificate of occupancy, or other mechanism, whichever occurs first; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Pr wner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ,?B,e_f?o?re( ?me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this O day of , lp?q personally appeared Gr-^!1 MWA6 who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents ofd e affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: Notary Publi ROBERT B GROSS °?Notory Public - Stole of Rio WC`0M" *Ipr EW-- Wk22.2007 COmmbalon # DD 215078 J. Irlalllllll(,J UE'flall!!lCl11IHF/?/IIUdf/V!I l?Vlll I." IUUVU uplllCIII I GViumuVII pf ul IGI IJIVG n lllll ICUCVUwjjll?Vill of ujCul dpPliUaIIUII l U" I U-LUUJ. UUU Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater Exhibit "A" Legal Descriptions and Parcel Numbers Ejoyln Inc. - Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 28, Magnolia Park, as per Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel Numbers: 15/29/15/54450/028/0040, 15/29/15/54450/028/0050, 15/29/15/54450/028/0060, 15/29/15/54450/028/0070 Craig Murtha - Lot 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, Block 33, Magnolia Park. As per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida Parcel Numbers: 15/29/15/54450/033/0110, 15/29/15/54450/033/0100, 15/29/15/54450/033/0090, 15/29/15/54450/033/0010, 15/29/15/54450/033/0020 Robert Resnik - Begin at the point of intersection of the South boundary of Block 29 of the Plat of Magnolia Park, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and the East right-of-way line of the abandoned right of way of Grantor (formerly the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad right of way) and go in a Southerly direction along said East right-of-way line, to the Northwest corner of Block 32 of said Plat of Magnolia Park; thence in a Westerly direction across the said abandoned right of way of Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company, to the Northeast corner of Block 33 of said Plat of Magnolia Park; thence in a Northerly direction, along the West right-of-way line of the abandoned right of way to the Southeast corner of Block 28 of said Plat of Magnolia Park; thence in an Easterly direction, across abandoned right of way, to the Southwest corner of said Block 29 and the Point of Beginning. (The above is a 60 foot right of way over and across Jasmine Way). AND The Northerly half of that certain parcel lying between Blocks 32 and 33, Magnolia Park, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 33, running thence along the South right of way line of Jasmine Way (vacated per O.R. Book 957, Page 192) on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 52 minutes 04 seconds East, 61.24 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 1, said Block 32; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 11 seconds West, along the West line of said Lot 1, 135 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence South 89 degrees 52 minutes 03 seconds West, 61.15 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 9; thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 08 seconds West, along the East line of same, 135 feet to the Point of Beginning. AND That certain parcel of the Atlantic Coastline Railroad right of way lying between Blocks 28 and 29, Magnolia Park, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Less the Westerly 7.0 feet of the North 135.12 feet of the vacated (formerly the Atlantic Coastline Railroad) right of way. Parcel Number : 16/29/15/00000/440/0100 Exhibit "B" Description of Request The proposed development is an urban scale, pedestrian friendly 45-unit townhouse community. This is an acceptable use under the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project designation of the Commercial and Office Flexible Development Standards. The front portion of the site is currently zoned commercial and the back portion is zoned office. The development standards do not set a minimum or maximum criteria for the front, side, and rear setbacks, building height, parcel dimensions, and parking as a basis to evaluate this request against. As such the following requests are made for the City's consideration, and are necessary for the feasibility of the development and to achieve the scale and character desired in an urban setting: Front Setback - 10' to the structure of the building, 45' to paver drive isle. (The front elevation will have porticos that will protrude no more that three feet into the setback.) This is consistent with the setbacks of existing properties along this stretch of Ft. Harrison, where some setbacks are zero. Side Setback - 5'-11" to the building, 3' to the paver drive isle on the south side, and 5'- 3" to the building, 3' to the paver drive isle on the north side of the commercial property. 7'-6" to the building, 4' to the paver drive isle on the south side and 7'-5" to the building, 6' to the paver drive isle on the north side of the office property. Back Setback - 5'6" to the building structure, 48' to paver drive isle. Building Height - 3 stories, 36.7' to the mid point of the roof. Lot Area and Width - the site is approximately 2.6 acres with approximately 280' of frontage on Ft. Harrison. The parcel will be subdivided through the plat process to provide fee simple ownership. Parking - Each unit will have a two-car garage. In addition there are an additional 72 driveway and parallel spaces. The parking ratio is approximately 3.6 spaces per unit. The project will have 24" concrete with stucco retaining wall located 2' from the front property line to provide a slightly elevated front yard for the units that face Ft. Harrison. This will allow the project to engage the street, but at the same time, provide a sense of separation and privacy to the homeowner. The project will have a stucco site wall six feet in height along the northern and southern property lines. • i Clearwater FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ?? -17' & (Me,&z FAX: D?/.9, J4 2 2, Phone: FROM: / /?? Phone: DATE: SUBJECT: 5!) ?? /? ? - 1J o o z5- MESSAGE: d"N" NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 0 0 J LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 December 17, 2004 Mr. Scott Doster Harbor Oaks LLLP 1501 S. Arrawana Avenue Tampa, FL 33625 Re: FLD2003-03017/PLT2004-00003; 504 Jasmine Way Dear Mr. Doster: On October 21, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with eight conditions the. above referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application to (1). permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows:. 5.92 feet to building, three feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, four feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive. Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C. and 2-10043 and as a Comprehensive. Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45. lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail.. You have submitted a letter dated December. 9, 2004, which itemizes revisions to plans approved by the Community Development Board. The revisions, which you itemize, are seen on plan sheets dated received by the City of Clearwater on October 13, 2004.. In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions enumerated by your letter are deemed to be minor revisions and are approved.. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when submitting for building permits. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4836. Sincerely, Frank G. Gerlock Development Review Manager S. IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationsVasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O) - ApprovedVasmine Way 504 Minor Revisions Letter December 17, 2004.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 Dec. 20 2004 09:12AN YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98138521622 Dec.20 09:11AM 00'59 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). 9 0 CITY OF CLEARWAT I ER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LANG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW December 17, 2004 Mr. Scott Doster Harbor Oaks LLLP 1501 S. Arrawana Avenue Tampa, FL 33625 Re: FLD2003-03017/PLT2004-00003; 504 Jasmine Way Dear Mr. Doster: On October 21, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with eight conditions the above referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application to. (1) permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, three feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, four feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-10043 and as a Comprehensive. Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine. Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail.. You have submitted a letter dated December 9, 2004, which itemizes revisions to plans approved by the Community Development Board.. The revisions, which you itemize, are seen on plan sheets dated received by the City of Clearwater on October 13, 2004. In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions enumerated by your letter are deemed to be minor revisions and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when submitting for building permits. Should you have any questions, feel free to. contact Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4836. Sincerely, Frank G. Gerlock Development Review Manager S: IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationsVasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O) - ApprovedVasmine Way 504 Minor Revisions Letter December 17, 2004.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYF,R" • Harbor Oaks LLLP. 1501 S. Arrawana Avenue Tampa FL 33625 December 9, 2004 Mr. Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater FL 33758 RE: Town Homes of Harbor Oaks, FLD2004-03017 Dear Mike: RECEIVED DEC 14 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT C41Y OF CLMRWATER Please accept this letter as a formal request to approve minor revisions to development order FLD2004-03017 that was approved on June 21, 2004. The architect made a correction to the exterior building system, changing a portion of exterior wall system from wood frame to concrete block, which necessitated minor changes to the architectural elevations. The architect also made a revision to the window elevations, which effected the banding and awning layout. The specific elevation revisions are as follows: Sheet EL-1, building type 1, corresponding to sheet A2.1.3, building 1, and A2.2.3, building 3,: Front Elevation ? 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat / bands. . ? 2. The shutter on first floor of the A-end unit was deleted. Rear Elevation ?Y The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands The second floor roofs were eliminated. The awnings on two of the third floor windows were deleted. Right Elevation ?1. The windows on the rear half of the unit were changed to shutters. ?2. Shutters were added to the first floor. Left Elevation ,1'1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. Sheet EL-2a and EL-2b, building type 2, corresponding to sheet A2.3.3a, A2.3.3b, and A2.3.3c, building 3: Front Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. t /2. The awnings on the third floor have been deleted. ?3. The portico on the first floor as been revised from two separate porticos to a single portico. Rea?Elevation ? 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. ?2. The second floor roofs were eliminated 1/ 3. The awnings on the third level have been deleted. V4. The gable roof elements were revised to provide additional character. The banding at the balconies on the second and third floors was revised to reflect an arch. The portico was revised to reflect the inclusion of the balconies above. :-4'/A A column was added to provide additional support. Righ?/Elevation The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands The second level roofs on the elevation were eliminated. The window layout for the A-end unit has been revised. The gable roof element was revised. Lef?Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat / bands ?2 The second level roofs on the elevation were eliminated. V3. The awnings on the third level have been deleted. ?. The window layout for the A-corner unit has been revised. IWW d5. A gable roof element was deleted. Sheet EL-3, building type 3, corresponding to sheet A2.4.3, building 4, and A2.5.3, building 5,: Fron Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands The awnings layout on the third floor was revised A gable roof element was added. Z.MD The balconies and corresponding roof details at thQAtird floor were deleted. ,rY Shutters were added to the second floor window layout. Rear Elevation The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands vI___The window layout was revised. 3. A gable roof element was added. ?4. Shutters were added to the first floor window layout Right Elevation ?? p 6 C?4 7Is,4fS 1. The window and shutter layout was revised. ?f?• 3 ?R6 /nlrr Left Elevation 1. The window and shutter layout was revised. A Z - S 3 ok Sheet EL-4, building type 4, corresponding to sheet A2.7.3, building 7: i Fron Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. Rea?jjElevation a/1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. The second floor roofs were eliminated A gable roof element was deleted. 04,41? 4 ,T.kerawning/ on the third floor w deleted. Rit Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. Left Elevation The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. Sheet EL-5, building type 5, corresponding to sheet A2.6.3, building 6: Fro Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. ?2 A shutter on the first floor was deleted. Two gable roof elements were added. Rear Elevation i 4. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat I bands. v/?1 The second floor roofs were eliminated A gable roof element was deleted. V. The awnings on the third floor were deleted. ??. The roof plan was revised to reflect a revised gable layout including the deletion on one gable element. L GF. r t 1R 1G NT 9j6vxsTw4 W Itwoo w r.)„ „p W"-G L A tA' The architectural style, finishes, colors, and materials have not changed. The revisions do not trigger any of the criteria that would require a revisit by the CDB. The revisions do not alter any walks or roadways, does not change the use, density or intensity, does not change any building footprints, setbacks, landscaping, or location, does not material modify or cancel any of the conditions placed on the development order, does not add any property to the development order, and does not increase the height of the buildings. Should you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me, 813.852.1621(o) or 813.928.4690(c). Thank you very much for your help in this matter. Best Regards, Scott Doster 0 0 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 December 17, 2004 Mr. Scott Doster Harbor Oaks LLLP 1501 S. Arrawana Avenue Tampa, FL 33625 Re: FLD2003-03017/PLT2004-00003;. 504 Jasmine Way Dear Mr. Doster: On October 21, 2003, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with eight conditions the above referenced case, which was a Flexible Development application to (1) permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, three feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, four feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the, provisions. of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B and as a Comprehensive. Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45. lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine. Way. between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. You have submitted a letter dated December 9, 2004, which itemizes revisions to plans approved by the Community Development Board. The revisions, which you itemize, are seen on plan sheets dated received by the City of Clearwater on October 13, 2004. In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions enumerated by your letter are deemed to be minor revisions and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when submitting for building permits. Should you have any questions, feel free. to contact Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4836. Sincerely, 'G.(' Frank G. Gerlock Development Review Manager. S:l Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationsUasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O) - ApprovedUasmine Way 504 Minor Revisions Letter December 17, 2004.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER • 0 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Scott Doster arbor Oaks LLLP 1501 S. Arrawana Avenue Tampa, FL 33625 Re: FLD2003-03017/PL Dea s. Harris: C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 December 17, 2004 3; 504 Jasmine Way On October 21, 2003, the Community Dv lopment Board (CDB) approved with eight conditions the above referenced case, which was a Flexible velopment application to (1) permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and si \eet as follows: 5.92 feet to building, three feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the comperty, 7.5. feet to building, four feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5building, and three feet to the north side of the office property,and rear setback of 5.5 feet to nd a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, uovisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, undeions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way va portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. You have submitted a letter dated December 9, 2004, whic itemizes revisions to plans approved by the Community Development Board. The revisions, which y u itemize, are seen on plan sheets dated received by the City of Clearwater on October 13, 2004. In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions end erated by your letter are deemed to. be. minor revisions and are approved. These minor revisions must be shown on the site plans and building plans when submitting for building permits. Should you have any q estions, feel free to contact Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727-5624836. Sincerely,. Frank G. erlock Development Review Manager ,/,W? AVL&M?) S: (Planning DepartmentlCD. BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationsUasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O) ApprovedUasmine Way 504 Minor Revisions Letter December 17, 2004.doc BRGW J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILL JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Harbor Oaks LLLP. 1501 S. Arrawana Avenue Tampa FL 33625 December 9, 2004 Mr. Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater FL 33758 RE: Town Homes of Harbor Oaks, FLD2004-03017 Dear Mike: C RE CEIVED DEC 14 2004 PLANNING DEPARTIVIEN 4Pt1Y OF CLEA,RWER Please accept this letter as a formal request to approve minor revisions to development order FLD2004-03017 that was approved on June 21, 2004. The architect made a correction to the exterior building system, changing a portion of exterior wall system from wood frame to concrete block, which necessitated minor changes to the architectural elevations. The architect also made a revision to the window elevations, which effected the banding and awning layout. The specific elevation revisions are as follows: Sheet EL-1, building type 1, corresponding to sheet A2.1.3, building 1, and A2.2.3, building 3,: Front Elevation ? 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. R ? / 2. The shutter on first floor of the A-end unit was deleted. Rear Elevation ?r The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands V/ The second floor roofs were eliminated. The awnings on two of the third floor windows were deleted. Right Elevation ?1. The windows on the rear half of the unit were changed to shutters. ?2. Shutters were added to the first floor. Left Elevation a/1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. Sheet EL-2a and EL-2b, building type 2, corresponding to sheet A2.3.3a, A2.3.3b, and A2.3.3c, building 3: Front Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. ? 2. The awnings on the third floor have been deleted. ?3. The portico on the first floor as been revised from two separate porticos to a single portico. Re Elevation ? 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. v'*"2. The second floor roofs were eliminated 3. The awnings on the third level have been deleted. V4. The gable roof elements were revised to provide additional character. v"5. The banding at the balconies on the second and third floors was revised to reflect an arch. ,?/The portico was revised to reflect the inclusion of the balconies above. tel. A column was added to provide additional support. Righ levation IA. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands y2/The second level roofs on the elevation were eliminated. /The window layout for the A-end unit has been revised. v4 The gable roof element was revised. Le40evation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands The second level roofs on the elevation were eliminated. d3. The awnings on the third level have been deleted. ?. The window layout for the A-corner unit has been revised. d5. A gable roof element was deleted. Sheet EL-3, building type 3, corresponding to sheet A2.4.3, building 4, and A2.5.3, building 5,: Fron Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands / The awnings layout on the third floor was revised v3. A gable roof element was added. Z-Nt., The balconies and corresponding roof details at the„? floor were deleted. v-5- Shutters were added to the second floor window layout. Rear Elevation The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands ? -The window layout was revised. k-3. A gable roof element was added. .-4. Shutters were added to the first floor window layout Right Elevation S, 0 6 F4X 147IbNS 1. The window and shutter layout was revised. ff?,, 3 ?i?k6 /?Ir Left Elevation 1. The window and shutter layout was revised. A Z - S 3 Sheet EL-4, building type 4, corresponding to sheet A2.7.3, building 7: 0 0 Fron Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. RElevation 7.1 The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. The second floor roofs were eliminated A gable roof element was deleted. p?E 4 ,T4ir?awningj on the third floor w0deleted. Ii Ft Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. Left levation The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. Sheet EL-5, building type 5, corresponding to sheet A2.6.3, building 6: Fron Elevation 1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat bands. ?L A shutter on the first floor was deleted. 3. Two gable roof elements were added. Rear Elevation V1. The window-banding layout on the third floor was revised from arch to flat / bands. The second floor roofs were eliminated 3 A gable roof element was deleted. The awnings on the third floor were deleted. ??. The roof plan was revised to reflect a revised gable layout including the deletion on one gable element. L E?' 121G NT F-.?6TLl.?t?? t) W I f4tol0 Wn?v y?o LJou.t? The architectural style, finishes, colors, and materials have not changed. The revisions do not trigger any of the criteria that would require a revisit by the CDB. The revisions do not alter any walks or roadways, does not change the use, density or intensity, does not change any building footprints, setbacks, landscaping, or location, does not material modify or cancel any of the conditions placed on the development order, does not add any property to the development order, and does not increase the height of the buildings. Should you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me, 813.852.1621(o) or 813.928.4690(c). Thank you very much for your help in this matter. Best Regards, Scott Doster • Harbor Oaks LLLP. 1501 S. Arrawana Avenue Tampa FL 33625 December 9, 2004 Mr. Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater FL 33758 RE: Town Homes of Harbor Oaks, FLD2004-03017 Dear Mike: 10 Thank you for your time this morning to review the zoning comments on the referenced project. Please accept this letter as a formal request to approve minor revisions to development order FLD2004-03017 that was approved on June 21, 2004. The architect made a correction to the exterior building system, changing a portion of exterior wall system from wood frame to concrete block, which necessitated minor changes to the architectural elevations. The changes include revisions to the window and shutter layout, revisions to the raised roof gables layout (denoted as towers in the comments), and the elimination of the balconies on the second floor of the type five building. Virtually all building elevations referenced in FDL 2004-03017 sheets EL-1 through EL-5 are effected by the correction, however, the architectural style, finishes, colors, and materials have not changed. The revisions do not trigger any of the criteria that would require a revisit by the CDB. The revisions do not alter any walks or roadways, does not change the use, density or intensity, does not change any building footprints, setbacks, landscaping, or location, does not material modify or cancel any of the conditions placed on the development order, does not add any property to the development order, and does not increase the height of the buildings. Should you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me, 813.852.1621(0) or 813.928.4690(c). Thank you very much for your help in this matter. Best Regards, AITUK&' Scott Doster Harbor Oaks LLLP. 1501 S. Arrawana Avenue Tampa FL 33625 r? I LS ti ? ? December 9, 2004 L5 (? I +??t LEC 10 Mr. Michael Reynolds City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater FL 33758 RE: Town Homes of Harbor Oaks, FLD2004-03017, BCP2004-10315 Dear Mike: Thank you for your time this morning to review the zoning comments on the referenced project. In response to your comments please consider the following: Comments: Clarify intended use of study on unit "D". Response: The study on unit "D" is intended to provide the owner with a space that can be used for home office applications. You will note that all of the units in this project have some form of study to provide the owner/occupant with workspace for a home office, art studio, etc. The added amenities, i.e. the bathroom and coffee bar, are an attempt to mitigate the condition of not being able to provide the study in an area that is contiguous with the rest of the living space. The space is not intended to be used as separate living quarters. For this specific reason we did not provide any means of accessing the space from the exterior of the unit. Comment: Color elevations required to verify approved color palette. Response: The attached colored elevations were provided with the application for FLD2004-03017. The colors are also noted on the elevations, sheets EL-1 through EL-5. The color palette and color scheme have not changed from the approved CDB application and will be installed per the attached. Should you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me, 813.852.1621(0) or 813.928.4690(c). Thank you very much for your help in this matter. Best Regards, Scott Doster _.., - LAI U !" M - --0 ' a 1`T' ! 2 ®M com Olin JDIJ -u-> 1 w-e , wre 1 .?I s , ama , 'RO\T r_-. NAIGN o-°x. ?rAfl ?. f t f t t II r ? i?SJ iy L I'I F'+y I N YY "Y .., .. y h rl.I 1 .? _' r { r .Y°.ry. ...}. 6 i i I ? I ??O-1 CC---1 F-7 F-I asv. nca• °: Qos. ?e . i t i?i..T.ze• y ate. -rrc - .: ri S v E..VA-10 I if u L, 1 AJiB j w-a , 1Nre I I-9 , 11A 3 RFA;Z F_ FVA-10\ 5 D_ F. FVA-ION Building Type - 1 Elevations Jasmine Way Townhomes Sht. EL-1 EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. GWI Investments D?17 3731 Brlmpark Dr, Sun 300 I I I ' HowtoN'rX 77042-5296 I IJ Ph.-: 713)789-0395 1/16" - I'-0° (11%17) --EDUbitwt- Clearwater, Florida 1/8° . V-0" (2036) A,Yyt ?' ,EXAM-CAUYONVIA-NE.YOR May 12, 2004 CGY1'NIGII'I' o b2o 2004 tlUl AllClII WCMR . INC. ALL 1UGIrI S IIESERU W • -=R0\T L_Lw\"ION fr H>roNr ? NAn Ac:v -.A P1 e ti s. ? Im rri. c:.n• a: e-vs. n? - kLA< ELEVATION Building Type - 2 Elevations jasmine Way Townhomes Sht. EL-2a EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. REM GWI Investments 3731 Brinrpnrk Dr, Suits 300 04017 Iluunun, TX 77042-5296 Ph.-(713)799-0395 1/8° - 1'-0° (24X36) t. ( 1 Www.ED1=bitwtum-,i Clearwater, Florida AmhitL"um, lnc:• TEXAS• CAUFM41A• NEW YORK COP\RTC,W 1) 2004 F.D1 ARCHIWM. RF.. MC. ALL RIGHTS RF.SFAW..D May ??? ??? u 5 G:::a-'yATlO'. "jA i i ?f JI CC 1 lu- c 1 Lvrc l Lvr Ae?n 1 ul-cna 1 w-c .N'A? , 5 U= ?L?VAT 10\ Building Type - 2 Elevations EL-2b Sht jasmine Way Townhomes . Kill GWI Investments EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. 3731 Brimpark Dr, SUR. 300 04017 H-on, 'fX 77042-5296 1/16"-I'-0"(IIX17) '?" "? ?'" " Phnnu:(713)789-0395 www.EDlurchit ?uru.cmn Clearwater, Florida 1/8" . 1'-0" (24X36) a niro, , Inc._ 'TEXAS-CALIFORNIA-NEIF'1'GRK May 12, 2004 CGYl'IU.CIIrr D 2004 hUl ARC111rhCfUFLE, INC. ALL RIGIIfS MSERftD .. _..T I I mill L C I ? I II I II II I I I I II II II 11 1 C CCCC CCC- CCCC COCC IOCC D CCOC COC-_ CCC COCC LOCO L\nD 1 N: 1 WTD .VT? 1 LYT: 1 WTAAti 1 I I I I 4 CCC CCC • FEONT FL VAI ON 5..)F F--VA-1014 I -P11 At- _ 1 ? I tll Ali IIlVi r? ?-( ?r} I rl j?, I hd? ?k ?1'( 1K ?I?: I tip ( l k - ? Y. , I L 'r. ... 1" * 420 I- 4 - t'lLV. 1?.9a' cl 4Lb. \-?-_ 5 (4vJ'tilul DnTA- 1 ?I ; ) WTD .VT: l V : 1 N , 1 RPAR FL F-,/AT 0\ ?D 5 E__VA- I,?N Building Type - 3 Elevations Sht EL-3 jasmine Way Townhomes . GWI Investments . ,I uul ?: ? ED[ A2CHITECTURE, INC. 3731 "narpark Dr, Suitc 300 04017 I IDURIUR. TX 77042-5296 1/16" - I'-0"(11X17) it ? I ' Phu (713) 789-0395 WWW.EDI4neh1IL".tum-n Clearwater, Forida 1/8° - I'•O' (24X36) AchiN memc TtlXA.S •C.4LIFDRNIA• NC\k' YORK n 00 May 12, 2Wl' COPIWCiW d) 2Ub1 F.D1 ARCHITF.CTURP., INC. ALL RTCiHTS RF.SF.RVF.D Hr. 4 4 YG Y:A._ °TN W:J° EL!. 3'IIE' ¢ &O5.'YP ..l , u+re F=ONT ?LFVAI ON 51.7. EI.FV.ATION 1 var A?+'n 1 tvr3 1 ?+-e wre 1 urA , r:: AP FL FVAT ON SIB= R FVATION Building Type - 4 Elevations EL-4 Sht jasmine Way Townhomes . GWI Investments p,v ED[ ARCHITECTURE, INC. 3731 BriRCpuk Dr, Suits 300 04017 Ilomon, TX 77042-529h I Phnnc (713)7X9-0395 -BDlchihm..emn Clearwater) Flor a I/8" - 1'-0' (2036) A ht ct Inc. TEXAS• CALIMNIA• NEkV YORK A May 12 200 COPIRIGHT 4)2004 FD1 ARCUNT..CTURE. INC. ALL RIGHTS RRSF.RWD , ` °.. Hr. i 0, T] EE coin g MM M '` ,r MM w. Mr • M«.Hm y F2GNT li/AT ON 7 T. ' 1 t 1 I ?I l 4\1 A l • 5 (;= =LEI/AT 101,. ?m N.a-,r -Ax orr .. -.. r _. nignp UMM OEM, cl, m i-- 7o luj _ JLJ - JJLJ JJLJJ JU L- DCCC =CC FEn JL-J I CCC CCCC r1n1??-?f-7 LO-M-7-P fFL•/.3E?' cl EtlS. i?' v 1 VIIT A-f.`D l l L,TF 1 „rL j MTA-NV 1 LVfc 1 M-L Mi. ?.: 1 R Af Ft FVAT GV 51'F L FVATIQ Building Type - 5 Elevations jasmine Way Townhomes Sht. EL-5 EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. GWI Investments 3731 111i-"L D, Suiw 300 04017 ...... M... TX 77042-5296 Pl.-: (713)7X9-0395 1/16" - I'-0" (11X17) -EDI-b,t mD xRI Clearwater, Florida I/V - I ?-0- (24X36) ?rn;f?xre,L TN1A4.CAL;EDRVU.RE?rVORK May 12, 2004 COP\RfOWO]004 ED) ARCH ..MJRR. MC. ALL RIGHTS RF.SF.RW..D 0 Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: d?Go-rr TOU ?i?-?li FAX: o0/,-- d`d-- Z - AL Z2-- Phone: FROM: Phone: -72- 7 SZ Z DATE: / 2 Z 7 - 6 SUBJECT: Yg'-- / 9D3c? ??(le57- Do 0 U?y MESSAGE: X-610 02- NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE 0 Dec. 17 2004 04:11PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98138521622 Dec.17 04:10PM 00'58 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800- ELP-FAX (435-7329). PPP_ ,rrrri?> Conditions Associated With BCP2004-10315 525 JASMINE WAY The following conditions must be satisfied before the permit can be processed. Status Engineering Review Don Melone 562-4798 10/18/2004 See site permit BCP2004-07346 for all site issues. Not Met Fire Review Joe Colbert 562-4567 xt 3548 12/08/2004 Provide locations for Smoke Detectors for Unit B Townhouses. See Sheet E-2 Not Met 12/08/2004 The Fire Alarm Panel must monitor all Fire Sprinkler tamper & flow switches and be addressable. Not Met PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE 12/08/2004 The monitoring of the Fire Sprinkler System must be by a listed Central Station. A copy of the Not Met monitoring ceretificate must be provided to the Fire Inspector at Final Inspection of the system. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE INTENT TO COMPLY 12/08/2004 The installation of the Fire Sprinkler System shall be in accordance with NFPA 13R, 1999 Edition Not Met by a licensed Fire Sprinkler Contractor under separate permit and plans. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE 12/08/2004 The installation of the Fire Alarm Panel and the wiring of the flow and tampers must be by a Not Met licensed Fire Alarm contractor with separate plans and permit. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE Land Resource Review Rick Albee 562-4741 10/20/2004 See site permit BCP2004-07346 for all site issues. Not Met Zoning Review Mike Reynolds 562-4836 12/06/2004 Clarify intended use of Study on unit "D" Not Met 12/06/2004 The windows/shutters on Buildings 1,2,4,7 do not match the approved plans. Not Met 12/06/2004 The roof detail and building elevations on Buildings 1,2,3,5,6,7 do not match the approved plans. Not Met 12/06/2004 The building elevations/towers on Buildings 6,7 "FRONT" do not match the approved plans. Not Met 12/06/2004 Tower roofing over balconies on the "REAR" elevations of building #3 do not match approved plan Not Met 12/06/2004 Entry roofing on the "FRONT" elevations of building #3 do not match approved plan 12/06/2004 The balconies on building #5 do not match approved plan 12/06/2004 Tower missing on the "FRONT" elevations of building #5 - do not match approved plan Colored Elevations-Review C Mike Reynolds 12/06/2004 Color Elevations required to verify approved color palette. 562-4836 Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 2 C diti A i d Wi on ons ssoc ate t M? ?w BCP2004-10315 525 JASMINE WAY -'rim! L?j,?#3 The following conditions must be satisfied before the permit can be processed. Status Engineering Review Don Melone 562-4798 10/18/2004 See site permit BCP2004-07346 for all site issues. Not Met Land Resource Review Rick Albee 562-4741 10/20/2004 See site permit BCP2004-07346 for all site issues. Not Met Zoning Review Mike Reynolds 562-4836 12/06/2004 Clarify intended use of Study on unit "D" Not Met 12/06/2004 The windows/shutters on Buildings 1,2,4,7 do not match the approved plans. Not Met 12/06/2004 The roof detail and building elevations on Buildings 1,2,3,5,6,7 do not match the approved plans. Not Met 2/06/2004 The building elevations/towers on Buildings 6,7 "FRONT" do not match the approved plans. Not Met 12/06/2004 Tower roofing over balconies on the "REAR" elevations of building #3 do not match approved plan Not Met 12/06/2004 Entry roofing on the "FRONT" elevations of building #3 do not match approved plan Not Met 12/06/2004 The balconies on building #5 do not match approved plan Not Met 12/06/2004 Tower missing on the "FRONT" elevations of building #5 - do not match approved plan Not Met Colored Elevations-Review C Mike Reynolds 562-4836 12/06/2004 Color Elevations required to verify approved color palette. Not Met The following reviews have not been completed: Dept Name Phone Building Review Development Services Neil Legters 562-4595 Electrical Review Development Services Ralph Rowe 562-4565 Fire Review Fire Joe Colbert 562-4567 x3548 Gas Review Development Services Neil Legters 562-4595 Mechanical Review Development Services Neil Legters 562-4595 Plumbing Review Development Services Neil Legters 562-4595 Zoning Review Planning Zoning Counter 562-4567 xt 2622 Print Date: 12/06/2004 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 11 MAR 2 4 2004 1 Ci f r r' .iZ'Jdr\I ER_ FLD20U`14`03017 504 JASMINE WAY Date Received.: 03/24/2004 JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES ZONING DISTRICT: O LAND USE: R/OG ATLAS PAGE: 295B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED PAID CK. NO. - Cam! ?•? DATE CLWCoverSheet GK,NO• 0 0 ORIGINAL PLT2004=00003 504 JASMINE WAY Date Received: 04/05/2004 GWI INVESTMENT INC. ZONING DISTRICT: O LAND USE: R/OG ATLAS PAGE: 295B PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR APR 0 5 2004 F?v CI pF t trA WNE CLWCoverSheet S?ptw 4/5/2004 Receipt #: 1200400000000003524 2:38:04PM ?p - Date: 04/05/2004 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PLT2004-00003 Preliminary Plat Payments: 010-341240 600.00 Line Item Total: $600.00 Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid Check GWI INVESTMENTS INC DR 245 In Person 60G Payment Total: $600.00 J V a -- +?° L r -'-- THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. -r This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cRcccipt.rpt Page 1 of I 0 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL GWI Invest(nents 10103 Hayfield Way,, Tampa FL 33626 (Ph) (813) 852-1621, (Fax) (813)852-1622 TO : City of Clearwater DATE : 12-May-04 100 S. Myrtle Ave PROJECT #: Clearwater, FL 33758 PROJECT NAME: Jasmine Way Townhomes Phone: Bus: (727) 562-4836 PAGES: Fax: Bus Fax: (727) 562-4865 ATTN: Michael Reynolds RE : CDB Submission We Are Sending You The Following : 15 copies of. Flexible Development Application Comprehensive Landscape Program Application Response to DRC Comments Colored site plan and elevations of typical buildings Plan Submission Set addressing items E thru I of the flexible development application x For Approval For Review & Comment For Your File For Field Distribution For Your Use As Requested For Bid Purposes Revisions As Noted Revise and Resubmit Approved As Noted REMARKS: DECEIVED MAY 12 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT `y CITY OF CLEARWATER I Scoff Doster Copies To: Ed Armstrong, Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Rupple & Burns, P.A. i r • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL GWI Investments 2510 W Prospect Road Tampa, FL 33629 (Ph) (813) 258-5240, (Fax) (813)258-5241 TO : City of Clearwater DATE : 22-Apr-04 100 S. Myrtle Ave PROJECT #: Clearwater, FL 33758 PROJECT NAME: Application # FLD2004-03017, Jasmine Way Phone: Bus: (727) 562-4836 PAGES: Fax: Bus Fax: (727) 562-4865 ATTN: Mike Reynolds RE : Comp. Landscape Program Application We Are Sending You The Following : One original and one copy of application RECEIVED Two copies of Landscape Plans APR 2 2 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT O1TY OF CLEARWATER For Approval & Return x For Review & Comment For Your File For Field Distribution For Your Use As Requested For Bid Purposes Revisions As Noted Revise and Resubmit Approved As Noted REMARKS: /t Scott Doster Copies To: r ? o ? C lea, w &A-c- '-- Oak ? t tu, aV',J 7-4? n, i " G k)% I n J! r-4kvw I AS Z sl o W ? NS ?pec.?- ?c? (?, K,,,? 4 ? 3 3 cQ 2 ? A M; V, 720K15 S? zti44- p L" 15 P ieS ?r?e l ivk ,?.? e L,,-l 'A 0p l ? ca.' o,n APR 0 5 2004 0 0 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL GWI Investments 2510 W Prospect Road Tampa, FL 33629 (Ph) (813) 258-5240, (Fax) (813) 258-5241 TO : City of Clearwater DATE : 24-Mar-04 PROJECT # : PROJECT NAME: Jasmine Way Townhomes Phone: PAGES: Fax: ATTN: Planning and Zoning RE : Flexible Development Application We Are Sending You The Following : 1 original and 14 copies of Flexible Development Application 15 copies of Site Engineering Plans wihl{ ?+ 15 copies of Landscape, Hardscape, Tree Survey & Mitigation, and Irrigation Plans a", 15 copies of Boundary, Tree, and Design Survey i f Pr limin Plat 15 r ?- r?'.,ryTM $,? cop es o e a y , Ag? 15 copies of reduced colored Landscape Plan P of O 15 copies of Building Elevation Plans , G 15 copies of reduced colored Building Elevation Plan 2 Copies of Drainage Calculations 1 Applciation Fee Check For Approval & Return x For Review & Comment For Your File For Field Distribution For Your Use As Requested For Bid Purposes Revisions As Noted Revise and Resubmit Approved As Noted REMARKS: ?? VJ Scott Doster Copies To: mp+ft--? J Clearwater U r FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: 2 a :,7 Phone: FROM: Phone: r DATE: "I d b SUBJECT: ?0cr?/jI/?/? f?ff?? MESSAGE: NA NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 4TE?t, Is,' LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Mr. Greg Iglehart Mr. Scott Doster Mr. Ed Armstrong 2510 West Prospect Road Tampa, Florida 33629 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 June 21, 2004 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - 504 Jasmine Way Gentlemen: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community Development Code. On June 15, 2004, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, three feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, four feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.13 and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail for the site at 504 Jasmine Way. Based on the application and the Staff recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.13. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3- 1202.G. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2. That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way; 3. That no building permits be issued until it is demonstrated that the proposed stormwater drainage system adequately conveys offsite drainage; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER Biu.JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • r June 21, 2004 Iglehart, Doster, and Armstong - Page Two 4. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 6. That revised mitigation counts be submitted for all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 7. That a revised landscape plan (to address tree height/caliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), be provided for consideration and approval by Staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 8. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by June 15, 2005). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 29, 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727- 562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: ors www. c 1 e arwater-1-c Sine, rely,. Lisa L. Fierce ?.; Assistant Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEAlInactive or Finished Applications Uasmine Way 504 -Approved Development OrderJune 15, 2004.doc Jul. 16 2004 01:07PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94472727 Jul.16 01:06PM 01'21 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). r Clearwater FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2,d Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 5624567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: FAX: &-? - v2J-?- J-?x ?z f Phone: FROM: 61&IU% /s'll?i /1/0 L?4f Phone• - - O SUBJECT: DATE: ? 'A"" y - 6006 3 Ism, C, L-1 A rr, . NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 617 CDB Meeting Date: June 15, 2004 Case Number: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 Agenda Item: E7 Owner/Applicant: E. Joyln Inc. Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Representative: GWI Investments (2510 W Prospect Rd, Tampa, F133629; phone: 813-258- 5240 fax: 813-258-5241• email: gwiggy@tampabay.rr.com Address: 504 Jasmine Way CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-10043 and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right- of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: C, Commercial District and O, Office District; CG, Commercial General Category and R/OG Residential/Office General District PROPERTY SIZE: 2.59 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached multi-family residential units Proposed Use: Attached multi-family residential units ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Office District, Commercial District, and Downtown District; Residential and Commercial East: Office District; Offices South: Office District and Commercial District; Offices West: Office District; Commercial and Offices CHARACTER OF THE Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 1 • i IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Commercial, office, and residential uses dominate the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.59-acre overall site is located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue and south of Druid Road. Jasmine Way is an existing City of Clearwater cul-de-sac right-of-way, approximately 270 feet in length. The cul-de-sac intersects with South Fort Harrison Avenue. At the rear of the cul-de-sac is a towering large tree. Beyond the tree to the east is an existing chain link fence and the Pinellas Trail. The site consists of a mix of housing types and styles that line Jasmine Way. With the exception of an existing surface parking lot, the site has considerable vegetation. Some pedestrian access to existing units is on South Fort Harrison Avenue and some access is from Jasmine Way. There are existing concrete sidewalks here. The architecture of the existing buildings is varied and some of it is attractive. Among the structures are a small cottage with a front porch, a bungalow-style house, and a house with columns and French doors facing the street. According to the site plan, there are 25 residential dwelling units existing on site. The existing site is pedestrian friendly with sidewalk connections to South Fort Harrison Avenue. Neighboring the site is a doctor's office, dentist, a tax service, other offices, and a clothing store. East of the site is an office park and the Pinellas Trail. Druid Road frames a small portion of the site, to the north. Proposal: The applicant is proposing preliminary plat approval for 45 lots. The proposal includes a right of way vacation for a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Proposed for new construction are 45 attached residential units. All of the existing structures are to be removed or demolished. The proposed development includes a swimming pool, sidewalks, and a pedestrian way to the Pinellas Trail. The site is to be well landscaped. Building height, for the highest building,-proposed is 36.98 feet from finished floor to mid point of the roof. The maximum density at this site is 46 units. The site plan indicates that each residential unit will have a two-car garage. The site plan shows 11 additional parking spaces on-site. Vehicular access to the site is via South Fort Harrison Avenue only. There is pedestrian connectivity both in terms of internal walkways and access to both South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Solid waste collection is by individual unit waste pick-up. The site plan set includes landscape and irrigation plans, and a tree survey/mitigation plan. What is proposed can be briefly summarized in three parts: (1) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment to allow for 45 residential attached units in Office and Commercial zoning districts, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way. The Comprehensive Infill proposal includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program application. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 2 L1 0 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1,2-704,2-1001.1 a"A 7_1 find) STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT IMPERVIOUS 0.71 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 maximum, CG; 0.75 maximum, R/OG) Note: Residential attached units are not a permitted land use within the Commercial and Office zoning districts. As such, there are no other standards to apply to the proposal, which is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment proposal. f nX4PT.TA7VVF. WTTH FT.FXTRTT.TTV f RTTF.RTA (Rectinnc 2-704_C and 2-1004.11): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 3 • (V11%/TPT i A NPIP WITH f'TNF.R A T . CT A NM A RT1C (Cprtinn 1_9111- Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting on May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2- 1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3-1202.G. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2. That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way, and the release of the existing north to south nine-foot drainage easement; 3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 4 0 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 5. Revise mitigation counts for all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 6. Provide a revised landscape plan (to address tree height/caliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), for consideration and approval by staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 7. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: At/? ? W ?? Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDBVasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O)Vasmine Way 504 Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 5 C7 Jun. 09 2004 08:58AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132585241 Jun.09 08:56AM 02'22 SND 06 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVP"TAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-EOO-HELP-FAX C435-7329). Jun. 09 2004 08:58AM YOUR LOGO City0fClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132585241 Jun.09 08:56AM 02'22 SND 06 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). ` Clearwater FAX CODER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2" a Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FAX: d9/3- 01-rf - j-'? y Phone: lD FROM` ??? //% G,?f Phone: DATE: G ` 7 ` D SUBJECT: 14!W a-00 It/ " Q3 d ( `7- 15 6r -oo ce- SOU U.3 MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) CDB Meeting Date: June 15, 2004 Case Number: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 Agenda Item: E7 Owner/Applicant: E Joyln Inc. Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Representative: GWI Investments (2510 W Prospect Rd Tampa, Fl 33629; phone: 813-258- 5240 fax: 813-258-5241• email: gwiggy@tampabay.rr.com Address: 504 Jasmine Way CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right- of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: C, Commercial District and O, Office District; CG, Commercial General Category and R/OG Residential/Office General District PROPERTY SIZE: 2.59 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached multi-family residential units Proposed Use: Attached multi-family residential units ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Office District, Commercial District, and Downtown District; Residential and Commercial East: Office District; Offices South: Office District and Commercial District; Offices West: Office District; Commercial and Offices CHARACTER OF THE Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 1 • 0 IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Commercial, office, and residential uses dominate the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.59-acre overall site is located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue and south of Druid Road. Jasmine Way is an existing City of Clearwater cul-de-sac right-of-way, approximately 270 feet in length. The cul-de-sac intersects with South Fort Harrison Avenue. At the rear of the cul-de-sac is a towering large tree. Beyond the tree to the east is an existing chain link fence and the Pinellas Trail. The site consists of a mix of housing types and styles that line Jasmine Way. With the exception of an existing surface parking lot, the site has considerable vegetation. Some pedestrian access to existing units is on South Fort Harrison Avenue and some access is from Jasmine Way. There are existing concrete sidewalks here. The architecture of the existing buildings is varied and some of it is attractive. Among the structures are a small cottage with a front porch, a bungalow-style house, and a house with columns and French doors facing the street. According to the site plan, there are 25 residential dwelling units existing on site. The existing site is pedestrian friendly with sidewalk connections to South Fort Harrison Avenue. Neighboring the site is a doctor's office, dentist, a tax service, other offices, and a clothing store. East of the site is an office park and the Pinellas Trail. Druid Road frames a small portion of the site, to the north. Proposal: The applicant is proposing preliminary plat approval for 45 lots. The proposal includes a right of way vacation for a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Proposed for new construction are 45 attached residential units. All of the existing structures are to be removed or demolished. The proposed development includes a swimming pool, sidewalks, and a pedestrian way to the Pinellas Trail. The site is to be well landscaped. Building height, for the highest building,-proposed is 36.98 feet from finished floor to mid point of the roof. The maximum density at this site is 46 units. The site plan indicates that each residential unit will have a two-car garage. The site plan shows 11 additional parking spaces on-site. Vehicular access to the site is via South Fort Harrison Avenue only. There is pedestrian connectivity both in terms of internal walkways and access to both South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Solid waste collection is by individual unit waste pick-up. The site plan set includes landscape and irrigation plans, and a tree survey/mitigation plan. What is proposed can be briefly summarized in three parts: (1) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment to allow for 45 residential attached units in Office and Commercial zoning districts, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way. The Comprehensive Infill proposal includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program application. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 2 • • Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1,2-704,2-1001.1 "As- r-ivv-iSTANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT IMPERVIOUS 0.71 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 maximum, CG; 0.75 maximum, R/OG) Note: Residential attached units are not a permitted land use within the Commercial and Office zoning districts. As such, there are no other standards to apply to the proposal, which is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment proposal. nnAAMY TAIUO AxITTU FT VYTRTT.TTV f'RTTRRTA (Rections 2-704.0 and 2-1004.8): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and develo ment standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 3 0 r?*,mr z ? ?rrt? ?a?7mu !rL'1?TTi'i? A T CTA NTIA RiIC lCPrtinn "x_91 ?l? VVl il L1L71\ V.-. - ---- ----- - - Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting on May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2- 10043 and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3-1202.G. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2. That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way, and the existing north to south nine-foot drainage easement; 3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 4 0 0 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 5. Revise mitigation counts for all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 6. Provide a revised landscape plan (to address tree height/caliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), for consideration and approval by staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 7. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDBVasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O)\Iasmine Way 504 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 5 • Jun. 07 2004 10:55AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132585241 Jun.07 10:52AM 02'17 SND 06 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL i-800-HELP-FAX 0435-7329). T? Reynolds, Mike From: Scott Doster [gdoster@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:11 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: Jasmine Way Townhomes - CDB Notification Mike, Thanks for the help. Susan sent me a sample of what is published for notification. If possible I would like to review with you the description that you are proposing for the notification. Please contact me at your convenience. Thanks again. Scott Doster GWI Investments 10103 Hayfield Way Tampa FL 33626 813.852.1621 813.852.1622 (f) gdoster@tampabay.rr.com -----Original Message----- From: Mike.Reynolds@myClearwater.com [mailto:Mike.Reynolds@myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 11:00 AM To: gdoster@tampabay.rr.com Cc: Angel.Haines@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Jasmine Way Townhomes - CDB Notification Scott, Susan Chase, of the City Clerk's office told me that we advertise in the Tampa Tribune only on Sunday so the advertisement date will be Sunday, May 30, 2004 not Saturday, May 29, 2004. Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike.reynolds@myclearwater.com 1 a r Reynolds, Mike From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 11:00 AM To: 'Scott Doster' Cc: Haines, Angel Subject: RE: Jasmine Way Townhomes - CDB Notification Scott, Susan Chase, of the City Clerk's office told me that we advertise in the Tampa Tribune only on Sunday so the advertisement date will be Sunday, May 30, 2004 not Saturday, May 29, 2004. Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike.reynolds@mvclearwater.com • r Reynolds, Mike From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:37 AM To: 'Scott Doster' Cc: Gerlock, Chip; Haines, Angel; Chase, Susan Subject: RE: Jasmine Way Townhomes - CDB Notification To: Scott Doster GWI Investments Scott, our schedule for the June 15, 2004 Community Development Board (CDB) meeting shows the date of May 29, 2004 as the CDB ad in newspaper. The Clerk's office at City Hall handles both newspaper notices and notification to property owners within a 500 foot radius of the FLD application project site. If you have specific questions as to the processing of the notice you can call Susan Chase at the City Clerk's office(tel. # 562-4099). As usual, you are always welcome to contact me via telephone or e-mail with any questions or concerns. Thank you for your inquiry. Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike.reynolds@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott Doster [mailto:gdoster@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:38 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: Jasmine Way Townhomes - CDB Notification Mike, Regarding the public notification for the CBD meeting scheduled for June 15, when does the public notice that the City publishes (I assume in the local paper) go out and what type of information does it contain. We want to make sure that we are ready to answer any questions the public may have about the project. Also, is notification sent to the residents and business owners within a given radius of the project or is the published notice the only notification? If mailed notification is required, who sends the notices out and what information will they include. I just want to make sure that we are not dropping the ball if we need to be providing something. Thanks. Scott Doster GWI Investments 10103 Hayfield Way Tampa FL 33626 813.852.1621 813.852.1622 (f) gdoster@tampabay.rr.com Case Number: FLD2004-03017 - 504 Jasmine Way RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ORIGINAL GENERAL ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Land use data on cover sheet shows 2.59 acres as existing ownership. Should be 2.2019 acres according to the proposed plat. Response No. 1: Revision to the cover sheet has been made. Comment No. 2: Project location on cover sheet is not accurate. Response No. 2: Changes to the cover sheet have been made. Comment No. 3: Sheet 3 of 6: Note #1 states that units 11 thru 14 have two parking spaces in driveway. The driveways scales only 10'+/-. This dimension doesn't meet standard parking space requirements. Response No. 3: All references to the parking spaces provided in driveways have been deleted. Only those spaces within the proposed garages and on street parking have been included in the parking count shown on the cover sheet. Comment No. 4: Response No. 4: Comment No. 5: Response No. 5: Comment No. 6: Response No. 6: Comment No. 7: Response No. 7: Comment No. 8: It appears that portions of the structures on Lots #23 and #34 are within the proposed 20 ft. drainage easement. Revisions have been made to Sheets 2B and 3. The easement area within Lot 23 and 34 will not include any building area. It appears that the pool patio in the common area is encroaching onto Lot #28, on Sheets 3 and 4 of 6. Lot lines for Lots 28 and 29 have been revised to eliminate this encroachment. All water mains to be a minimum of 4" not 3" as shown. All 3" water mains have been eliminated. configuration. See Sheet 4 for revised water main Need to label all F.D.C. connections. Done. See Sheet 4. Water meter for pool area to be installed within grass/landscape area, not within pool deck as shown. MAY 12 ?.004 Response No. 8: Done. See Sheet 4. Comment No. 9: Will the existing fire hydrant stay in service? If so, need to show on Sheet 4 of 6. Response No. 9: The existing fire hydrant at the project entrance will be relocated. See Sheet 4. Comment No. 10: All utilities (electric, phone, and etc.) for this development to be buried. Response No. 10: A note stating this requirement has been added to Sheet 2A. Comment No. 11: There is an existing 2" gas main along Jasmine Way: Will gas service be needed for this proposed development? If not, need to coordinate with Clearwater Gas to abandon the 2" gas main (all applicable fees to be paid for by applicant). Response No. 11: Abandonment of the existing 2" gas main will be coordinated with Clearwater Gas. Comment No. 12: Need to show all existing utilities not proposed to be abandoned on Sheet 4 of 6 and cut and cap locations for abandonment of existing utilities. Response No. 12: Those utilities to be abandoned, cut/capped are now shown on Sheets 3 and 4. Comment No. 13: Need to show how/where the existing storm (east/west storm main) within former railroad right-of-way is going to be addressed. Response No. 13: Sheet 3 now shows this existing storm sewer and where it will be capped. Comment No. 14: How will Solid Waste be collected on the two streets south of Jasmine Way and the one-way drive? Response No. 14: This item is no longer applicable. Comment No. 15: Men and women's bathrooms and entry arbor for pool area are within the sight visibility triangle for units 28 and 29. Response No. 15: It is our understanding that the location of the bathrooms is now acceptable to City staff. Comment No. 16: Privacy walls for units 1 thru 10 are shown in the "common area" per plat. Response No. 16: Lot lines for Lots 1 through 10 have been revised to eliminate this issue. Comment No. 17: Proposed stairs for units 5 and 41 are being constructed within the proposed 10 ft. blanket water main easement. Response No. 17: The water system has been revised to eliminate this issue. See Sheet 4. 200k ?' Ili MAY a ? • • Comment No. 18: F.D.C. connections need to be shown a minimum of 15 ft. from any structure. Response No. 18: Done. Comment No. 19: Need to show all fire lines to all buildings. Also need to show each backflow preventor device (B.F.P.D.) for each fire line. Gate valves will be required on both side of B.F.P.D. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Response No. 19: Detail has been added to Sheet 4. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: Comment No. 1: Vacation of Jasmine Way and the 9 ft. drainage easement. Response No. 1: Understood for Jasmine Way. The 9ft drainage easement is a private easement for the benefit of the adjacent property owner, not the City. Currently, the easement is intended to convey the drainage for the adjacent property owner to the City system, however, much of the drainage does not go through the 9ft drainage easement. We will be rerouting the property owners drainage as shown on sheet 3 of 6 We discussed this solution with the City Engineer and he concurred that the easement vacation is not relevant to the City and not a necessary condition to obtain building permits. Comment No. 2: Final plat recorded. Response No. 2: Understood. Comment No. 3: Need to obtain a F.D.O.T. right-of-way permit for all work within the right-of-way of South Fort Harrison Avenue. Response No. 3: Understood. PLT2004-00003 CONDITIONS: Comment No. 1: Private drainage easement for Lot #29, for all common acres and private drive that has any part of the storm system within it? Response No. 1: The configuration of the pool has been revised to eliminate a drainage pipe along the east side of the property. Comment No. 2: Need to show proposed names for all streets/roadways. Response No. 2: Done. See Sheet 2A. Comment No. 3: Need an approval from post office for. all proposed street na-mes: ?? 3 • • Response No. 3: Done. All street names have been approved by the local post office. Comment No. 4: Lot #34 has proposed a private sidewalk within the common area? Response No. 4: Lot lines have been revised to eliminate this issue. Comment No. 5: Need to show all bearings for all lot lines shown: a) Lot #19 - Need to show the bearing for the line dimensioned 7.19 ft. b) Lot #16 - Need to show the bearing for all three lines along the ease side. C) Lot #14 - Need to show the bearing for the line dimensioned 14.00 ft. and 9.00 ft. Response No. 5: Done. See Sheet 2B. Comment No. 6: May need to show the common area along the north property line via blow-up. Response No. 6: It is our understanding that staff determined existing detail is adequate Comment No. 7: Landscaping for the development (shown on Sheet LP.1) is shown on private property perimeter lots. Response No. 7: Landscaping for development is on both common and private property. The Home Owners Association will be responsible for maintenance of all landscaping. Comment No. 8: Irrigation for the landscaping around perimeter is on private property. Response No. 8: A common irrigation system is provide for common and private property. The irrigation system will be operated and maintained by the Home Owner Association. Comment No. 9: Need to show bearing and distance on the boundary survey for the proposed 20 ft. drainage easement. Response No. 9: Although the exact location of the proposed drainage easement may change with the development of the utility construction plans, bearing and distance for the drainage easement is now shown on Sheet 2B. ENVIRONMENTAL: No Comments FIRE: ? MAY I 200b Comment No. 1: Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 2411. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4 Response No. 1: Fire Marshall Joel Grey has clarified that adequate water mains and hydrants are to be installed to service any buildings that are under construction or locations where combustible materials are stored. The complete water service does not need to be installed prior to commencing vertical construction, however, water service and stabilized roads shall be installed to service each specific building prior to commencement of construction of that building. The developer understands the requirement and will comply. Comment No. 2: All turn radii must -be at least 28 ft. to accommodate emergency vehicles. Show prior to CDB. Response No. 2: Done. See Sheet 3. Comment No. 3: The northern-most roadway designated as a one-way must be treated as a fire lane and must be a minimum of 20 feet in width and be posted as a fire lane with freestanding signs with the wording, "NO PARKING FIRE LANE BY ORDER OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT". Such signs must be 12 inches by 18 inches with a white background and red letters and shall be a maximum of 7 feet in height from the roadway to the bottom part of the sign. As per NFPAl, Sec. 3-5.4 modified. Show Prior to CDB. Response No. 3: A configuration acceptable to City staff is now shown on all plan sheets. Comment No. 4: Plans submitted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition and the following Codes: NFPA 101, 200 Edition, NFPA 70, 1999 Edition and Florida Statute 633. Show on a Code Reference Sheet. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT. Response No. 4: The permit set of building plans will reflect adherence to codes listed above. Comment No. 5: Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA 1, Sec. 3-5.6. Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT. Response No. 5: Done. See Sheet 4. Comment No. 6: Provide drawings that have been prepared by or under the direction of an Engineer registered under F.S. Chapter 471 for all fire sprinkler systems as per Florida Building Code, 2001. Edition, Sec. 104.4.1.3 Drawings shall be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer as per F.S. 471.025. The installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Sprinkler Contractor under separate permit with drawings. Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLD. PERMIT. - MAY 2 2???1 5 Response No. 6: Understood. Comment No. 7: Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance. As per Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2000 Edition, modification to Section 3-5.6 of NFPA 1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT Response No. 7: Done. See Sheet 4. HARBOR MASTER: No Comments LEGAL: No Comments LAND RESOURCES: Comment No. 1: Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating; root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. Response No. 1: Required information has been included on Sheet TS-l. Comment No. 2: The tree survey is incomplete, also include all trees within 25' of the property. Update all plans prior to CDB. Response No. 2: Trees have now been added to Sheet 3 and Sheet TS-1 Comment No. 3: Tree locations/symbols missing on the Tree Survey/Mitigation Plan. Show prior to CDB. Response No. 3: Missing Trees and symbols have beed included on Sheet TS-1. Comment No. 4: Revise mitigation counts after revising tree survey prior to CDB. 200?y p?AY 12 Response No. 4: Comment No. 5: Done Explain "N/A" in the "Action" column on the Tree Survey & Mitigation Plan prior to CDB. Response No. 5: Plan is revised to provide clarification. Comment No. 6: Show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plans prior to CDB. Response No. 6: Done. See Sheets 3 and 4, and sheets LP-1 and TS-1 Comment No. 7: Relocate storm inlet #12 and associated piping outside of the canopy line of tree #17 prior to CDB. Response No. 7: Done. See Sheet 3. Comment No. 8: Show the proposed sidewalk elevations at tree #17 prior to CDB. Recommend walks to be placed "On Grade". Response No. 8: Done. See Sheet 3. Comment No. 9: Response No. 9 Comment No. 10: Response No. 10: Comment No. 11: Response No. 11: LANDSCAPING: Show a "X" on all trees to be removed, include all trees rated 2 or below prior to CDB. Done. Show a lintel system for the perimeter wall system at all trees impacted by the wall prior to CDB. A note has been added on sheet TS-1 depicting the locations of the lintel wall system in order to provide a "brdige" over tree roots in existing trees to be preserved. Save tree #31 prior to CBD. It is our understanding that this item is no longer required. Comment No. 1: The plans show "East Palatka Holly" which is prone to disease, change out with Dahoon Holly. Response No. 1: All East Palatka Hollies have been replaced with Dahoon Holly as depicted on the Plant List, sheet LP-1. Comment No. 2: Cloud all changes made and submit letter of transmittal to-Ifiefflect changes. J ? 7 MAY 12 20011 • Response No. 2: C? All changes have been clouded, and letter of transmittal has been included. Comment No. 3: Plans have a basic look along Ft. Harrison proposed, although uniform and neat, recommend changing some of the Viburnum to Azalia for color accents at every other unit perhaps. Response No. 3: Viburnum has been replaced with Allamanda at every other unit, as depicted on the Landscape Plan sheet LP-1. Comment No. 4: Areas where the Live Oaks are being used are shown at 20' o.c., as these tend to need more space, recommend spacing of 30' to 35' o.c. to allow for growth and spread of branches. Also, the substitution of some of the trees with Magnolia and/or Maple trees may add another texture or color to the landscape. Response No. 4: Live Oak spacing has been revised along Ft. Harrison and along the entry drive to be 30' o.c. as depicted on the Landscape Plan, sheet LP-1. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: Open Space and Recreation Impact Fees are due to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for existing residential units. Please contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817. Response No. 1: Understood. STORMWATER: SOLID WASTE: No Comments No Comments TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: 20' x 20' sight distance triangles must be shown at all street and/or driveway intersections per (City of Clearwater's Community Development Code Section 3- 904). O bjects w ithin t he s ight d istance t riangles in ust n of a xceed 3 0" in height from the pavement i.e. masonry wall must not obstruct sight visibility. Also cars backing out of driveway must not back out blindly. Response No. 1: It is our understanding that the layout now meets this requirement. Comment No. 2: Parallel parking spaces must meet city standard of 8' wide x 23' long,? 8 MAY 12 2001: • • Response No. 2: Three spaces have been eliminated. All spaces are now at least 23' in length. Comment No. 3: All driveways where outside parking is proposed must be a minimum of 20' long. Response No. 3: All reference to outside parking has been removed from the plans. Comment No. 4: Curb radii at S. Ft. Harrison entrance must be a minimum radius of 28'. Response No. 4: Done. Comment No. 5: Include one-way signs, do not enter signs and pavement arrows where appropriate for internal circulation per Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Response No. 5: One way signs and do not enter signs are shown on Sheet 3. Comment No. 6: Will this community have a gate? If so show location and provide details on the operation of the gate. Response No. 6: No gate is proposed. Comment No. 7: Where driveways are less than 20' long from face of garage to back of sidewalk or edge of street, adequate length is required to provide safe sight distance for vehicles backing into the street. Response No. 7: It is our understanding that the City Engineer has eliminated this issue. Comment No. 8: Provide an appropriate number of handicapped parking spaces based on number of public/guest spaces provided. (Fair Housing Act: provide H/C spaces where there are public/common uses i.e. pool, park and picnic area). Response No. 8: There are no "covered units" (units that have elevator access or are ground floor units) per the Fair Housing Act, therefore Fair Housing does not apply to the public/common uses. Comment No. 9: Community Development Code Section 3-1907 requires sidewalks along private streets, although an interior sidewalk system is proposed, Units 14 and 23 through 34 are not provided connectivity to the sidewalk system. Response No. 9: It is our understanding that the City Engineer has eliminated this issue. Comment No. 10: All of the above to be address prior to CDB. Response No. 10: Understood. nil MAY 12 ?00". 9 • PLANNING: Site Plan: Comment No. 1: The applicant needs to provide the maximum density information on the site plan. This project is located both within split zoning districts and future land use designations. The applicant will also need to show us the computations made to arrive at the maximum density number. This information is needed by Deb Richter for impact fees determination. Response No. 1: See cover sheet for Land Use Data. Comment No. 2: Show any patios and setback dimensions for same. Response No. 2: Done. Comment No. 3: Label all outdoor lighting. Response No. 3: A note regarding this issue is shown on Sheet 2A. Comment No. 4: Show and label proposed sidewalks. Response No. 4: All sidewalks are shown on Sheet 2A. Comment No. 5: Reference the water removal and location of black barrel stowage. Response No. 5: No longer applicable. Comment No. 6: The six foot high walls are shown located within a visibility triangle. Response No. 6: The westerly ends of the six foot high walls have been removed from the visibility triangles. See Sheet 3. Comment No. 7: Provide color elevations for all typicals. Response No. 7: Done. Comment No. 8: The proposed lot area needs to be adjusted to account for the vacation. Response No. 8: Revisions have been made to the Land Use Data on the cover sheet. Comment No. 9: Building height needs to be labeled to the midpoint of the roof. Response No. 9: Done. 10 MAYa2200 Comment No. 10: Identify any environmentally unique areas as specified on the site plan application form (page 4). Response No. 10: No "unique" environmental areas exist on t he s ite. T his s tatement i s n ow s hown o n Page 4 of the application. Comment No. 11: Locate all public and private easements. Response No. 11: All public and private easements are now either shown graphically or via notes on the plans. Comment No. 12: Show all public and private utilities. Response No. 12: Done. See Sheets 3 and 4. Comment No. 13: Dimension out (with arrows and linear feet) the driveway lengths. Response No. 13: Done. See Sheet 2A. Comment No. 14: Assemble the various plans to one plan set with one index page. Response No. 14: Done. All Sheets are now included in one set and one index page is now all inclusive. Site Data Table: Comment No. 1: State the total paved area, including all parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area. Response No. 1: It is our understanding that this item is no longer applicable. Comment No. 2: Provide the official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements. Response No. 2: The appropriate information is shown on Sheet 2A. Comment No. 3: There is a discrepancy in the building height stated here and on the application form narrative. Response No 3: The application and plans indicate the correct building height. Building Elevations: Comment No. 1: Show building height with dimensional arrows from the base flood elevation to midpoint of the roof, and show dimensional arrows midpoint. State the total height (the elevations show height in increments without a total). ?? •+ 11 A • Response No. 1: Done. KAJasminc Way\Lcttcrs\cm.01.doc MAY 12 200? 12 • w Clearwater FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2"d Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO FAX: d©d-;?X41- 7a 7 _ OOVOP - FROM: e. ?I -Phone: 72 7 -- s76 7,- V pj,6 DATE: SUBJECT: 1??-d ;.,IfU ?Z- e3 b l 54- MESSAGE: re OR, NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) ?• 10.30 am' Case Number: FLD2004-030 - 504 JASMINE WAY 0 4 Owner(s): E Jolyn, Inc DRAFT 504 Jasmine Way Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Gwi Investments 2510 W Prospect Rd Tampa, Fl 33629 TELEPHONE: 813-258-5240, FAX: 813-528-5241, E-MAIL: gwiggy@tampabay.rr.com Representative: Gwi Investments 2510 W Prospect Rd Tampa, F133629 TELEPHONE: 813-258-5240, FAX: 813-258-5241, E-MAIL: gwiggy@tampabay.rr.com Location: 2.59 acres located on the east side of S. Ft. Harrison, generally south of Cleveland St. Atlas Page: 295B i l/ Zoning District: O, Office le e ? S Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 45 attached dwellings with reductions to the required front / setback from 25 feet to 10 feet to building, a reduction to the required side setbacks as follows: 5' 11" to building, 3 feet to paver drive aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7'6" to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 7' 5" to building, and six feet to the paver drive aisle on the north side of the office property, and a rear setback of 5'6" to building, and a building height of 36.7 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.13. and Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Association Association(s): Clearwater, H 33756 301 Druid Rd. West TELEPHONE: 727-447-8081, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Senior Planner Attendees Included: Mike Reynolds, Chip Gerlock, Scott Rice The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 10 1) Land use data over sheet shows 2.59 acres as existing owners Should be 2.2019 acres according to the proposed plat. 2) Project location on cover sheet is not accurate. 3) Sheet 3 of 6: Note #1 states that units 11 thru 14 have two parking spaces in driveway. The driveways scales only 10'+/-. This dimension doesn't meet standard parking space requirements. 4) It appears that portions of the structures on Lots #23 and #34 are within the proposed 20 ft. drainage easement. 5) It appears that the pool patio in the common area is encroaching onto Lot #28, on Sheets 3 and 4 of 6. 6) All water mains to be a minimum of 4" not 3" as shown. 7) Need to label all F.D.C. connections. 8) Water meter for pool area to be installed within grass/landscape area, not within pool deck as shown. 9) Will the existing fire hydrant stay in service? If so, need to show on Sheet 4 of 6. 10) All utilities (electric, phone, and etc.) for this development to be buried. 11) There is an existing 2" gas main along Jasmine Way: Will gas service be needed for this proposed development? If not, need to coordinate with Clearwater Gas to abandon the 2" gas main (all applicable fees to be paid for by applicant). 12) Need to show all existing utilities not proposed to be abandoned on Sheet 4 of 6 and cut and cap locations for abandonment of existing utilities. 13) Need to show how/where the existing storm (east/west storm main) within former railroad right-of-way is going to be addressed. 14) How will Solid Waste be collected on the two streets south of Jasmine Way and the one-way drive? 15) Men and women's bathrooms and entry arbor for pool area are within the sight visibility triangle for units 28 and 29. 16) Privacy walls for units 1 thru 10 are shown in the "common area" per plat. 17) Proposed stairs for units 5 and 41 are being constructed within the proposed 10 ft. blanket water main easement. 18) F.D.C. connections need to be shown a minimum of 15 ft. from any structure. 19) Need to show all fire lines to all buildings. Also need to show each backflow preventor device (B.F.P.D.) for each fire line. Gate valves will be required on both sides of B.F.P.D. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1) Vacation of Jasmine Way and the 9 ft. drainage easement. 2) Final plat recorded. 3) Need to obtain a F.D.O.T. right-of-way permit for all work within the right-of-way of South Fort Harrison Avenue. PLT2004-00003 CONDITIONS: 1) Private drainage easement for Lot #29, for all common areas and private drive that has any part of the storm system within it? 2) Need to show proposed names for all streets/roadways. 3) Need an approval from post office for all proposed street names. 4) Lot #34 has proposed a private sidewalk within the common area? 5) Need to show all bearings for all lot lines shown: a) Lot #19 - Need to show the bearing for the line dimensioned 7.19 ft. b) Lot #16 -Need to show the bearing for all three lines along the east side. c) Lot #14 - Need to show the bearing for the line dimensioned 14.00 ft. and 9.00 ft. 6) May need to show the common area along the north property line via blow-up. 7) Landscaping for the development (shown on Sheet LP. 1) is shown on private property perimeter lots. 8) Irrigation for the landscaping around perimeter is on private property. 9) Need to show bearing and distance on the boundary survey for the proposed 20 ft. drainage easement. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Environmental: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 11 Fire: • 9 1 . Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2. All turn radii must be at least 28 ft. to accomodate emergency vehicles. Show prior to CDB 3. The northern-most roadway designated as a one-way must be treated as a fire lane and must be a minimum of 20 feet in width and be posted as a fire lane with freestanding signs with the wording, "NO PARKING FIRE LANE BY ORDER OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT". Such signs must be 12inches by 18 inches with a white backround and red letters and shall be a maximum of 7 feet in height from the roadway to the bottom part of the sign. As per NFPA 1, Sec. 3-5.4 modified. Show Prior to CDB 4. Plans submitted for Fire Review must reflect adherence to Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2001 Edition and the following Codes: NFPA 101, 2000 Edition, NFPA 70, 1999 Edition and Florida Statute 633. Show on a Code Reference Sheet. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 5. Clearances of 7 Vh feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA 1, Sec.3-5.6 Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 6. Provide drawings that have been prepared by or under the direction of an Engineer registered under F.S. Chapter 471 for all fire sprinkler systems as per Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition, Sec. 104.4.1.3 Drawings shall be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer as per F.S. 471.025 The installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 13, 1999 Edition by a licensed Fire Sprinkler Contractor under separate permit with drawings. Please acknowledge. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT 7. Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7'/z feet in front of and to the sides of appliance. As per Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2000 Edition, modification to Section 3-5.6 of NFPA 1. Please acknowledge intent to comply. PRIOR TO BLDG. PERMIT Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. 2. The tree survey is incomplete, also include all trees within 25' of the property. Update all plans prior to CDB. 3. Tree locations/symbols missing on the Tree Survey/Mitigation Plan. Show prior to CDB. 4. Revise mitigation counts after revising tree survey prior to CDB. 5. Explain "N/A" in the "Action" column on the Tree Survey & Mitigation Plan prior to CDB. 6. Show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plans prior to CDB. 7. Relocate storm inlet #12 and associated piping outside of the canopy line of tree # 17 prior to CDB. 8. Show the proposed sidewalk elevations at tree #17 prior to CDB. Recommend walks to be placed "On Grade". 9. Show a "X" on all trees to be removed, include all trees rated 2 or below prior to CDB. 10. Show a lintel system for the perirmeter wall system at all trees impacted by the wall prior to CDB. 11 . Save tree #31 prior to CBD. Landscaping: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 12 Parks and Recreation: is 1 . Open Space and Recreation Impact Fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for existing residential units. Please contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817. Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1.20' x 20' sight distance triangles must be shown at all street and/or driveway intersections per (City of Clearwater's Community Development Code Section 3-904). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement i.e. masonry wall must not obstruct sight visibility. Also cars backing out of driveway must not back out blindly. 2. Parallel parking spaces must meet city standard of 8' wide x 23' long. 3. All driveways where outside parking is proposed must be a minimum of 20' long. 4. Curb radii at S. Ft. Harrison entrance must be a minimum radius of 28'. 5. Include one-way signs, do not enter signs and pavement arrows where appropriate for internal circulation per Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 6. Will this community have a gate? If so show location and provide details on the operation of the gate. 7. Where driveways are less than 20' long from face of garage to back of sidewalk or edge of street, adequate length is required to provide safe sight distance for vehicles backing into the street. 8. Provide an appropriate number of handicapped parking spaces based on number of public/guest spaces provided. (Fair Housing Act: provide H/C spaces where there are public/common uses i.e. pool, park and picnic area.) 9. Community Development Code Section 3-1907 requires sidewalks along private streets, although an interior sidewalk system is proposed, Units 14 and 23 through 34 are not provided connectivity to the sidewalk system. 10. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. * Traffic Impact Fees of $28,000.00 to be paid prior to C.O. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 13 The following iteniked to be addressed in order for your submittaite considered "sufficient": Site Plan 1. The applicant needs to provide the maximum density information on the site plan. This project is located both within split zoning districts and future land use designations. The applicant will also need to show us the computations made to arrive at the maximum density number. This information is needed by Deb Richter for impact fees determination. 2. Show any patios and setback dimensions for same. 3. Label all outdoor lighting. 4. Show and label proposed sidewalks. 5. Reference the wate removal and location of black barrel stowage. 6. The six foot high walls are shown located within a visibility triangle. 7. Provide color elevations for all typicals. 8. The proposed lot area needs to be adjusted to account for the vacation. 9. Building height needs to be labeled to the midpoint of the roof. 10. Identify any environmentally unique areas as specified on the site plan application form (page 4). 11. Locate all public and private easements. 12. Show all public and private utilities. 13. Dimension out (with arrows and linear feet) the driveway lengths. 14. Assemble the various plans to one plan set with one index page Site Data Table 1. State the total paved area, including all parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area. 2. Provide the official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements. 3. There is a discrepancy in the building height stated here and on the application form narrative. Building Elevations 1. Show building height with dimensional arrows from base flood elevation to midpoint of the roof, and show dimensional arrows. midpoint. State the total height (the elevations show height in increments without a total). Provide all signage information as requested on the application form. Notes: Other: No Comments D6 Q 771X,44& A -/ " J7 A/, -,L e,4 A& J,t/ vii' s" v,f/, Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 14 10:30 am, Case Number: PLT2004-000 504 JASMINE WAY Owner(s): E Jolyn, Inc 504 Jasmine Way Clearwater, F133756 TELEPHONE: 727-447-2727, FAX: 727-447-2727, E-MAIL: No Email Owner(s): Craig Murtha 504 Jasmine Way Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: 727-447-2727, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Gwi Investment 2510 W Prospect Rd Tampa, F133609 TELEPHONE: 813-258-5240, FAX: 813-258-5241,E-MAIL: No Email Location: Atlas Page: 295B Zoning District: O, Office Request: See FLD2004-03017 for all comments and conditions. Proposed Use: Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 301 Druid Rd. West TELEPHONE: 727-447-8081, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Senior Planner Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: No Comments Environmental: No Comments Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: No Comments Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: No Comments Planning: No Comments Other: No Comments Notes: DRAFT Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 6, 2004 - Page 15 ?eI?JAIf???ll??9?J?J?19? ? • May. 04 2004 12:16PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132585241 May.04 12:13PM 02'24 SND 07 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #304. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). May. 04 2004 12:19PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98483648 May.04 12:16PM 02131 SND 07 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-iELP-FAX C435-7329). Reynolds, Mike From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 10:25 AM To: Richter, Debbie Subject: RE: 504 Jasmine Way Deb, The application is proposing 45 residential units. The applicant needs to provide the maximum density information on the site plan. This project is located both within split zoning districts and future land use designations. The applicant will also need to show us the computations made to arrive at the maximum density number. I will note this concern in my sufficiency comments for the DRC meeting. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Richter, Debbie Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 9:05 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: 504 Jasmine Way What is the # of alllowable units on this site, 45 or 46? Scott Roster is working with me on estimating the O5/R impact fees that will be due for this project. They are proposing 45 units but Scott mentioned 46 units would be allowable under the current zoning. This factors into my formula and since it isn't noted on the plan I'd like to get your input. Thanks Mike. Deb Richter 562-4817 Reynolds, Mike From: Richter, Debbie Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 9:05 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: 504 Jasmine Way What is the # of alllowable units on this site, 45 or 46? Scott boster is working with me on estimating the OS/R impact fees that will be due for this project. They are proposing 45 units but Scott mentioned 46 units would be allowable under the current zoning. This factors into my formula and since it isn't noted on the plan I'd like to get your input. Thanks Mike. beb Richter 562-4817 0 Clearwater U .7 FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: +1CO H d a v'? FAX: OP"/3 ' 02??- id FROM: avz?tiePhone: _W.7 DATE: S SUBJECT: r--;0'6 y 03 d MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 0 0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW March 30, 2004 Mr. Greg Iglehart Mr. Scott Doster Mr. Ed Armstrong 2510 West Prospect Road Tampa, Florida 33629 RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit 45 attached dwellings with reductions to the required front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet to building, a reduction to the required side setbacks as follows: 5' 11" to building, 3 feet to paver drive aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7' 6" to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 7' 5" to building, and six feet to the paver drive aisle on the north side of the office property, and a rear setback of 5'6" to building, and a building height of 36.7 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2- 704.C and 2-1004.B. and Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots (Case number: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004- , 504 Jasmine Way). Note: this description may change depending upon the provision of additional submittal information. Gentlemen: The Planning Staff has reviewed your application as referenced above. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete: The following items need to be addressed in order to make your application complete: 1. Complete an Application for Plat Approval and submit a preliminary plat application fee of $600.00. 2. Add a site plan sheet to your application plan sheet, to be a civil site plan, showing the outline of all proposed buildings, pavement, and setbacks. The setbacks should be shown with dimensional arrows and stated in linear feet. The site plan should also include zoning boundary lines to indicate what is Commercial zoning district and what is Office zoning district. The civil site plan sheet should follow the submittal requirements as stated on the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application form page 4. 3. Provide page 4 of the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application form, completed. BRIAN J. AtINGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYf HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER W111-1-NEY GRAY, COMMISSIONIT FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® 1311.1. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AI'I'IRAIAIIVI', Acrm I:NIPLOYI?R" 0 0 Greg Iglehart, Scott Doster, Ed Armstrong March 30, 2004 Page 2 The above three items must be completed and submitted to the Planning Department no later than 4:00 pm on April 5, 2004 in order for the applications to go forward to the Development Review Committee Meeting scheduled for May 6, 2004. The following items need to be addressed in order for your submittal to be considered "sufficient": Site Plan 1. Provide a base (civil) site plan as indicated above. 2. Revise the index sheet to include the site plan. 3. Label all outdoor lighting. 4. Show and label proposed sidewalks. 5. Label dumpster staging areas. 6. Show the footprint of all proposed buildings 7. Label the site plan with dimensional arrows. 8. Show all proposed points of access. 9. Provide visibility triangles. 10. Identify any environmentally unique areas as specified on the site plan application form (page 4). 11. Locate all public and private easements. 12. Show all public and private utilities. 13. Show all parking spaces and vehicular access ways. 14. Assemble the various plans to one plan set with one index page. Site Data Table 1. State the total paved area, including all parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area. 2. Provide the official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements. 3. There is a discrepancy in the building height stated here and on the application form narrative. Landscaping Plan Requirements 1. Complete Comprehensive Landscape Program application form. Building Elevations 1. Show building height with dimensional arrows from base flood elevation to roof midpoint. State the total height (the elevations show height in increments without a total). Provide all signage information as requested on the application form. 0 0 Greg Iglehart, Scott Doster, Ed Armstrong March 30, 2004 Page 3 The Development Review Committee will review the application for sufficiency on May 6, 2004, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the municipal service building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue in Clearwater. You or your client must be present to answer any questions that the Committee may have regarding your application. Any responses to the above "sufficiency" comments may be helpful at the DRC meeting, but additional staff comments will be provided at the meeting. Both the above stated comments and DRC meeting comments must be addressed and submitted to the Planning Department by May 13, 2004, no later than 12 Noon (provide15 copies of all submittals). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4836. Sincerely, Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Senior Planner SAPlanning Department\C D BTLEMPending cases\Up for the next DRCVasmine Way 504 - Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O)Vasmine Way 504 Complete Letter.doc 9 0 Mar. 31 2004 08:27AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98132585241 Mar.31 08:26AM 01'27 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX AUUANTFC3E ASSISTANCE, PLEBE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). 1% 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW March 30, 2004 Mr. Greg Iglehart Mr. Scott Doster Mr. Ed Armstrong 2510 West Prospect Road Tampa, Florida 33629 RE: Application for Flexible Development approval to permit 45 attached dwellings with reductions to the required front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet to building, a reduction to the required side setbacks as follows: 5' 11" to building, 3 feet to paver drive aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7' 6" to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 7' 5" to building, and six feet to the paver drive aisle on the north side of the office property, and a rear setback of 5'6" to building, and a building height of 36.7 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2- 704.C and 2-1004.B. and Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots (Case number: FI-D2004-03017/PLT2004- , 504 Jasmine Way). Note: this description may change depending upon the provision of additional submittal information. Gentlemen: The Planning Staff has reviewed your application as referenced above. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete. The following items need to be addressed in order to make your application complete: 1. Complete an Application for Plat Approval and submit a preliminary plat application fee of $600.00. 2. Add a site plan sheet to your application plan sheet, to be a civil site plan, showing the outline of all proposed buildings, pavement, and setbacks. The setbacks should be shown with dimensional arrows and stated in linear feet. The site plan should also include zoning boundary lines to indicate what is Commercial zoning district and what is Office zoning district. The civil site plan sheet should follow the submittal requirements as stated on the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application form page 4. 3. Provide page 4 of the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application form, completed. BRIAN 1. Aumis-r, MAYOR-CoMMISSR)NER Horr HAMIIXON, VICE MAYOR-COMM]SSR)NEK \X'111TN1?Y GRAY, CoMMIsSR)NHR FRANK I IIISBARI), COMMISSIONER ® 1311.1. JoNSoN, Commissiom:lR 'TOIJAL EMPLOYMENT AND API'IRMATIV1'. AC'i-m EMPLOYRR" 4i 0 Greg Iglehart, Scott Doster, Ed Armstrong March 30, 2004 Page 2 0 The above three items must be completed and submitted to the Planning Department no later than 4:00 pm on April 5, 2004 in order for the applications to go forward to the Development Review Committee Meeting scheduled for May 6, 2004. The following items need to be addressed in order for your submittal to be considered "sufficient": Site Plan 1. Provide a base (civil) site plan as indicated above. 2. Revise the index sheet to include the site plan. 3. Label all outdoor lighting. 4. Show and label proposed sidewalks. 5. Label dumpster staging areas. 6. Show the footprint of all proposed buildings 7. Label the site plan with dimensional arrows. 8. Show all proposed points of access. 9. Provide visibility triangles. 10. Identify any environmentally unique areas as specified on the site plan application form (page 4). 11. Locate all public and private easements. 12. Show all public and private utilities. 13. Show all parking spaces and vehicular access ways. 14. Assemble the various plans to one plan set with one index page. Site Data Table 1. State the total paved area, including all parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area. 2. Provide the official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easements. 3. There is a discrepancy in the building height stated here and on the application form narrative. Landscaping Plan Requirements 1. Complete Comprehensive Landscape Program application form. Building Elevations 1. Show building height with dimensional arrows from base flood elevation to roof midpoint. State the total height (the elevations show height in increments without a total). Provide all signage information as requested on the application form. E. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL RTQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)`gr p/SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ]TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; Q" LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (i.e. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; t?PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); p?d? ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; F. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) H ITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): { v,? All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; ?_ / Location map; ? Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; Include floor plates on multi-story buildings; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; (' Note: Per Section 3-911, all utilities shall be located/relocated underground) All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas, including handicapped spaces; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); - Location of all landscape material; - Location of all jurisdictional lines adjacent to wetlands; - Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; - Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and - Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; - Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; - Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; - Building and structure heights; - Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and - Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project- City of Clearwater MIEMORANDUM ORIGINAL TO: Members of the Community Development Board FROM: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III 1A V RE: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003, 504 Jasmine Way DATE: June 15, 2004 The staff report for this project includes a condition that no building permits be issued until the release of the existing north to south nine foot drainage easement. City of Clearwater Engineering staff has provided an amendment to replace this condition with, "That no building permits be issued until it is demonstrated that the proposed stormwater drainage system adequately conveys offsite drainage." This amended condition was written upon a staff review of the condition as worded in the staff report and after a discussion between the Development Review Manager and an Assistant City Attorney. The Staff recommendation for this case continues to be for APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3-1202.G. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2. That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way; 3. That no building hermits be issued until it is demonstrated that the proposed stormwater drainage system adequately conveys offsite drainage; -3-.4. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 45. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; June 15, 2004 FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003, 504 Jasmine Way CDB Memo - Page 2 -5-.6. Revise mitigation counts for all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 6:7. Provide a revised landscape plan (to address tree height/caliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), for consideration and approval by staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 78. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings. SAPlanning Department\C D B?FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDBVasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O)Iasmine Way 504 Amended Conditions Memorandum.doc i ? ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: June 15, 2004 e? d •4-? Case Number: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 Agenda Item: E7 d?"h.d?v1,?•a„?-?t 1 Owner/Applicant: E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Representative: GWI Investments (2510 W Prospect Rd, Tampa, F133629; phone: 813-258- 5240, fax: 813-258-5241; email: gwiggy@tampabay.rr.co m Address: 504 Jasmine Way CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right- of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: C, Commercial District and O, Office District; CG, Commercial General Category and R/OG Residential/Office General District PROPERTY SIZE: 2.59 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached multi-family residential units Proposed Use: Attached multi-family residential units ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Office District, Commercial District, and Downtown District; Residential and Commercial East: Office District; Offices South: Office District and Commercial District; Offices West: Office District; Commercial and Offices CHARACTER OF THE Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 1 • IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Commercial, office, and residential uses dominate the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.59-acre overall site is located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue and south of Druid Road. Jasmine Way is an existing City of Clearwater cul-de-sac right-of-way, approximately 270 feet in length. The cul-de-sac intersects with South Fort Harrison Avenue. At the rear of the cul-de-sac is a towering large tree. Beyond the tree to the east is an existing chain link fence and the Pinellas Trail. The site consists of a mix of housing types and styles that line Jasmine Way. With the exception of an existing surface parking lot, the site has considerable vegetation. Some pedestrian access to existing units is on South Fort Harrison Avenue and some access is from Jasmine Way. There are existing concrete sidewalks here. The architecture of the existing buildings is varied and some of it is attractive. Among the structures are a small cottage with a front porch, a bungalow-style house, and a house with columns and French doors facing the street. According to the site plan, there are 25 residential dwelling units existing on site. The existing site is pedestrian friendly with sidewalk connections to South Fort Harrison Avenue. Neighboring the site is a doctor's office, dentist, a tax service, other offices, and a clothing store. East of the site is an office park and the Pinellas Trail. Druid Road frames a small portion of the site, to the north. Proposal: The applicant is proposing preliminary plat approval for 45 lots. The proposal includes a right of way vacation for a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Proposed for new construction are 45 attached residential units. All of the existing structures are to be removed or demolished. The proposed development includes a swimming pool, sidewalks, and a pedestrian way to the Pinellas Trail. The site is to be well landscaped. Building height, for the highest building,-proposed is 36.98 feet from finished floor to mid point of the roof. The maximum density at this site is 46 units. The site plan indicates that each residential unit will have a two-car garage. The site plan shows 11 additional parking spaces on-site. Vehicular access to the site is via South Fort Harrison Avenue only. There is pedestrian connectivity both in terms of internal walkways and access to both South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Solid waste collection is by individual unit waste pick-up. The site plan set includes landscape and irrigation plans, and a tree survey/mitigation plan. What is proposed can be briefly summarized in three parts: (1) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment to allow for 45 residential attached units in Office and Commercial zoning districts, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way. The Comprehensive Infill proposal includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program application. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 2 0 0 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1,2-704,2-1001.1 and 2-1004) STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT IMPERVIOUS 0.71 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 maximum, CG; 0.75 maximum, R/OG) Note: Residential attached units are not a permitted land use within the Commercial and Office zoning districts. As such, there are no other standards to apply to the proposal, which is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment proposal. rnmPT.TANCF. WTTN FI,F.XTRTT,TTV CRTTF.RTA (Rectianc 2-704-C and 2-1004-R1_ Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 3 C COMPLIANCE WITH GENF,RAT STANDARDS (Section 3-9131: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting on May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2- 1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3-1202.G. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2. That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way, and the release of the existing north to south nine-foot drainage easement; 3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 4 E.4 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 5. Revise mitigation counts for all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 6. Provide a revised landscape plan (to address tree height/caliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), for consideration and approval by staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 7. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: hl/?ice '? , e: -t5= w?? Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application SAPlanning Department\C D BTLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDBVasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O)Vasmine Way 504 Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 5 CDB Meeting Date: June 15, 2004 OBSOLETE Case Number: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 PF!!Ok Agenda Item: E7 Owner/Applicant: E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Representative: GWI Investments (2510 W Prospect Rd, Tampa, F133629; phone: 813-258- 5240, fax: 813-258-5241; email: gwiggy@tampabay.rr.com Address: 504 Jasmine Way CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT G' STE GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit 45 attac dwellin with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.13 and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right- of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: C, Commercial District and O, Office District; CG, Commercial General Category and R/OG Residential/Office General District PROPERTY SIZE: 2.59 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached multi-family residential units Proposed Use: Attached multi-family residential units ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Office District, Commercial District, and Downtown District; Residential and Commercial East: Office District; Offices South: Office District and Commercial District; Offices West: Office District; Commercial and Offices CHARACTER OF THE Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 1 • 0 INUMEDIATE VICINITY: Commercial, office, and residential uses dominate the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.59-acre overall site is located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue and south of Druid Road. Jasmine Way is an existing City of Clearwater cul-de-sac right-of-way, approximately 270 feet in length. The cul-de-sac intersects with South Fort Harrison Avenue. At the rear of the cul-de-sac is a towering large tree. Beyond the tree to the east is an existing chain link fence and the Pinellas Trail. The site consists of a mix of housing types and styles that line Jasmine Way. With the exception of an existing surface parking lot, the site has considerable vegetation. Some pedestrian access to existing units is on South Fort Harrison Avenue and some access is from Jasmine Way. There are existing concrete sidewalks here. The architecture of the existing buildings is varied and some of it is attractive. Among the structures are a small cottage with a front porch, a bungalow-style house, and a house with columns and French doors facing the street. According to the site plan, there are 25 residential dwelling units existing on site. The existing site is pedestrian friendly with sidewalk connections to South Fort Harrison Avenue. Neighboring the site is a doctor's office, dentist, a tax service, other offices, and a clothing store. East of the site is an office park and the Pinellas Trail. Druid Road frames a small portion of the site, to the north. Proposal: The applicant is proposing preliminary plat approval for 45 lots. The proposal includes a right of way vacation for a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Proposed for new construction are 45 attached residential units. All of the existing structures are to be removed or demolished. The proposed development includes a swimming pool, sidewalks, and a pedestrian way to the Pinellas Trail. The site is to be well landscaped. Building height, for the highest building,-proposed is 36.98 feet from finished floor to mid point of the roof. The maximum density at this site is 46 units. The site plan indicates that each residential unit will have a two-car garage. The site plan shows 11 additional parking spaces on-site. Vehicular access to the site is via South Fort Harrison Avenue only. There is pedestrian connectivity both in terms of internal walkways and access to both South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Solid waste collection is by individual unit waste pick-up. The site plan set includes landscape and irrigation plans, and a tree survey/mitigation plan. What is proposed can be briefly summarized in three parts: (1) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment to allow for 45 residential attached units in Office and Commercial zoning districts, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way. The Comprehensive Infill proposal includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program application. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 2 0 0 J Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1,2-704,2-1001.1 and 2-1004) STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT IMPERVIOUS 0.71 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 maximum, CG; 0.75 maximum, R/OG) Note: Residential attached units are not a permitted land use within the Commercial and Office zoning districts. As such, there are no other standards to apply to the proposal, which is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment proposal. MMPT.TANCE WITH FT.F.NTRTT.TTV CRTTF.RTA (Cpctinnc 2-704-C and 2-1004-R1- Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 3 • MNIPT.TAN(R WITH GRNFRAT. STANDARDS (Spctinn 3-913)! Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting on May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2- 1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3-1202.G. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2. That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way, and the existing north to south nine-foot drainage easement; 3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 4 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 5. Revise mitigation counts for all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 6. Provide a revised landscape plan (to address tree height/caliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), for consideration and approval by staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 7. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX\Pending cases\Up for the next CDBVasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and ONasmine Way 504 Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 5 r • ST _ el P o o-^o 1 P 1 P P P I 1 `106 r - CO) 1 1 O I `i W DRUID RD y r ?, z v rn-- a I r-- m lz ooh n - ' L--- etail m 1 810 I ?? ---1 -- ffice I I , 1----1 ?'- P. to ? ra2o ? JASMINE WAY i , 9P0 a , LI I i?- -- i -- LJ- -j L-9-06 r MAGNOLIA DR I i m:? a ---I j ? looo j ti l a l „ ?? 701 h 907 1 Ir- ? t I s r, tJ 1 -1 I m DRUID RD ------, --I I---?_= ---- ? o M , -= I I I h b I , Offices 1 1 7 I r , 1 1- I I t---- - I I I ' Offices 1 I Existing Surrounding Uses Map FLD2004-03017/PLT2004- Owner. E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Case: 00003 Site: 504 Jasmine Way Property Size(Acres): 2.59 acres 15/29/15/54450/033/0110, 15/29/15/54450/033/0100, 15/29/15/54450/033/0090, PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0010, 15/29/15/54450/033/0020 Atlas Page: 2958 0 5 PIN ST INS e 701 h b 10 Q 10 PR - 0 0 0 a 70 CB c v a v 0 E y U RU? ((?? 7 N N Q ~ ap O W DRUID RD y DRUID RD N N N m a aoo Z h v h m h `? e r m aoa RU 810 JASMINE WAY o R/OG h a a a v 900 901 U G 906 907 ? g MAGNOLIA DR 01 100 a 1002 s h R F INS CG O P 1055 Future Land Use Map Owner. I E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Case: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004- 00003 Site: 504 Jasmine Way Property Size(Acres): 2.59 acres 15/29/15/54450/033/0110, 15/29/15/54450/033/0100, PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0090, 15/29/15/54450/033/0010, 15/29/15/54450/033/0020 Atlas Page: 2958 • • ST I I t o ; o--o I v I v v a r-q06 --- .I rr I r -- J ? I j I r r-- ? W DRUID .RD ' -N a i-- I r--lam soot r--? r1 I_I s1o I I I N r8 -71 1 1 j_I I r,_ Lj I _I a MAGNOLIA DR 1 v 1 ? _ 1 701 VLj . 1 Ir I I j t . 0 h D n 1_ b h o m' I I I I I --I ---t---? I I I _ 1 L I I ? I ? I 1 I I---, I I I I I- I L I -I 1 I ----- t j I Z R I--- I Zoning Map Owner: E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik I Case: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004- 00003 Site: 504 Jasmine Way Property Size (Acres) : 2.59 acres 15/29/15/54450/033/0110, 15/29/15/54450/033/0100, PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0090, 15/29/15/54450/033/0010, 15/29/15/54450/033/0020 Atlas Page: 2956 LMDR __ I I ti I I I I r la 9Qo I E 0 •_ F ?. /-? r ? - . -,. , t fq _ r I 01 + • .aw i __. ?."tYilif, It tii t And Aerial Map Owner: E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Case: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004- 00003 Site: 504 Jasmine Way Property Size(Acres): 2.59 acres 15/29/15/54450/033/0110, 15/29/15/54450/033/0100, PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0090, 15/29/15/54450/033/0010, 15/29/15/54450/033/0020 Atlas Page: 2956 qfi n l? 7 ? `1 I- E r? Top to bottom: Looking west, north, and south 504 Jasmine, FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 dr'r ri*` F T LL r D R J ID R O A D .n?wr?e? ao? ?? ' twn xa.vw ortynrznu,a FARTM E 41i ` 'WATER w ?. snrb mE2sro?r=?? _ Z ? - Z 111 - ' ?.. I o us _ - ?a fj) ti W.1 z ` Z T? r I"Y z j'I 2401.1 Q ??? ? ! It ;;A€ bpi` 2k j o _ i j ate' ?• ?1 ? -? ? ?? x; i CONCEAL LANDSCAPE PLAN LP-1 RsL 1"-1i _e s th • ?1Y' ? ecB?S x,1' al J.':C .V-5 , lm6 , =RO\T E.. V.A-IGN 8 . U A i _ 4 Ct=C OME O C CCOOCCC C - - CCCCOCC C OOOC C - f I f 1-1 ??r1 r1 1 l Mr6 l w-e Bare 1 .v-s , tv,. 1 :eAe r-- rvA-IO\ Building Type - 1 Elevations Jasmine Way Townhomes EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. 3731 Brmrpmt Dr. Suittc 300 H-on, '1'X 77042-5296 Phu- (713) 789-0395 www.ED1Brchit"t -ww .AS • CAU ORVIA • XW YOM CGPI'RIGII1 0 20DI EDI atOn I ECI LRE, NC. ALL RIGI HS RESERVW Sht. EL-1 acxlwaff, FWida MAY 12 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER T T 1 IT_ 5 Of E_=VA- ON GWI Investments 04017 1/16' - 1'-0- 01X17) 1/8° 0 1'-0- (24X36) May 12, 2004 n_ e.: vA-ION -2 n? - 0 $ 3 N-f-fl. rrl. r 1 TIT -0 --ROV E_L'?A"ION -A - e 3 o ? h Ftl. aMPPl. g REA< ELEVATION Building Type - 2 Elevations jasmine Way Townhomes - Sht. EL-2a rr ?,? A? EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. GWI Investments 3731 Briorpazk Dr, Suite 300 Iluuvun,TX 770x2-529M1 (11017 A icSila 1- Pb-(713)789-0395 W-ED =hiturtnn.wm Clearwater, 1W7Ielt F? a MAY 12 2004 1/16-- I'-0-(11X17) - 1'-0- (24X36) , TEXAS• CALIFORNIA - NEW YORK COP)'R1GW 4) 2004 F.D1 ARCHM..CIVRF.. WC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED May 12, 2004 may PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 , D' ft. f\/ATJO 0 RECOVED MAY 12 ZU04 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 5 G-= -=LwA710\ Building Type - 2 Elevations jasmine Way Townhomes Sht. EL-2b EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. GWI Invesumts 3731 Br-perk Dr, Suirc 300 Haus[o 4'CX 77042-5296 04017 Ph_: (713) 789-0395 1/16" . 1'-0' (11 X 17) www.EDle?chinrwruwm A"6i4c'"'re, 70C' rexAS•cw-NEW YOxr Ckat va[Nr'FIW?] 1Po'. 1'-U'(247(36) FOR4u COPYKLrirr02D04EDI"Clu'rECriv E,uC. A LWGIrISNESERVED May 12, 2004 7 w 7 -I I Lvrnew 1 m-1H_ 7 w-c -I- • 4 _D • ? w't7B IL:'.3?'h' ct & mrrrm I I ? ? III rrr ""??i III 0 FEONI L JAI ON ?u 1 L- - 4 CLLV. %SY ci ttlb. 1'T. ?JI io w"l F, ?'o „ffi n 'F'? n ?? m '? m Qty `'= F - =vA-ioN W. 1 N, 1 wro I, 1 ?. 1 N, 1 ?o RP,AR FL FJAT G\ 5 7= E =`?A"-ION Building Type - 3 Elevations jasmine Way Townhomes Sht. EL-3 fmrw rmw n w 9 Mm rmw EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. I V I= GW1 Investments 3731 0-P.k Dr, Suim 300 04017 ? h-: 7117709M Phwtc: (713) 7RY-03Y5 1116 ' . 1' -0"(1 I%17) www .EDlnrchitwtun:.cum aR>ur wre, rR?. S•CUlFI1RWA•NIWY/1RK Tti%A t7e?nvater, Florkla MAY 2 2004 -0' I' 1/8' + l24X36) . COPYRIGHTO 2004MIARCHMECTURE. MC. ALL RIGHTSRESFRVF.D May 12, 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 9 1 4 a IP FPSIIt a. Bd...'!rv ? FiV n a • s ! aLV. Bllt• Q ans. w -. tur. 1 xB w.e 1 urA , R-AR FL FVAT ON Building Type - 4 Elevations jasmine Way Townhomes EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. 3731 B-puk Dr, Suite 300 11uuaTUn, TX 77042-5296 Phu..:(713)7R9-0395 W W W.EDI-hiturtu-u ArcSIt?Wtc'Lrc' TtiXAS-CALIFORNIA-NEW YORK COP\RIGW 1) 2004 F.DI ARCHI'IF.CR)RF.. WC. ALL RIGMS RF.SF.RWM t„A 1 n_ B - 1 FECN7 LFVAION Gealwatu, FWW UJ ?h AL g Mr h_lG ?UF FI_FVAIICN 5IO_ FL FVATICN R rm 0 IF i \/r n Sht. EL-4 GWI Investments MAY 12 2004 1/16-_ -0-(IIX0 1/8- - V-0' (24X36) [PLANNING DEPARTMENT May 12, 2004 CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 s D ? wnrw_ • e N r ?L- s` TI, E F<GNT =1. =VAT ON 5G =LFVATIO\ 1 I.r,. 1 Svc 1 .ur A-ho l me 1 ,nrc , .Nr.+B:. 1 K -,-'\R F1 F'VAT ON 51.7E L FVATIO\ Building Type - 5 Elevations Jasmine Way Townhomes Sht. EL-5 EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. GWI Investments 0 3731 BrimWk Dr, Suilc 300 I Iuu tun, TX 77042-5296 Ph-(713)789-0395 MAY 1 2 2004 04017 1,16'. 1'-0•(1IX17) -.EDl- ha u..uum m !]IW]L!1', FIMIG2 /E' - 1--0- (24X36) ,... (:ALIFDRWA•NlIY YORK C0P1-RR)Frr 4) 20D0 F.DI ARCH CNRE.. NC. ALL R7GHTS RESERVED May 12, 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Reynolds, Mike From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:41 AM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Cc: Fierce, Lisa; Gerlock, Chip Subject: FW: 9' Drainage Easement - Jasmine Way Townhomes Cyndi, Scott Doster is still seeking a revision to the Staff Report Approval Condition # 2, pertaining to the release of the 9 foot wide drainage easement prior to building permit issuance. Chip Gerlock, Scott Rice, and I met with Scott Doster yesterday. Attached is an e-mail summarizing where we are with the issue as of end of yesterday. Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 m ike.reynolds @ myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 4:28 PM To: Quillen, Michael Cc: Doherty, Steve; Gerlock, Chip; Reynolds, Mike Subject: 9' Drainage Easement - Jasmine Way Townhomes Mike I spoke with Ed Mazur by phone this morning and Chip Gerlock, Mike Reynolds and I met with Scott Doster this afternoon regarding the subject application. As I now understand, the easement was granted to the property owner to the north of the project to provide for the discharge from his property. The easement grants no rights to convey the drainage from the south to the City system. My concern all along has been the potential for backwater to the south as a result of the proposed 24-inch culvert replacing an open channel ditch. Since the existing easement does not address this issue, a new condition has been added that requires a demonstration that the proposed stormwater system is designed to adequately convey this water from the south. With this new condition, my concern is being addressed. Chip contacted Leslie Dougal-Sides and requested a legal opinion on the release of the private easement. Her advice was that since the project does not propose structures in the easement, the requirement for release of the easement is not necessary. This condition is therefore going to be deleted. Please let me know if these changes causes any problems for you. Thanks, D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyCiearwater.com 0 0 Reynolds, Mike From: Rice, Scoff Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:43 AM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: Jasmine Way Townhomes Mike Based upon discussions yesterday regarding the subject application and legal's opinion on the private easement, I would like to add the following condition to the staff report to replace the requirement to submit a release of the private easement: That no buildings permits be issued until it is demonstrated that the proposed stormwater drainage system adequately conveys offsite drainage. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4789 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Reynolds, Mike From: Rice, Scoff Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 4:28 PM To: Quillen, Michael Cc: Doherty, Steve; Gerlock, Chip; Reynolds, Mike Subject: 9' Drainage Easement - Jasmine Way Townhomes Mike I spoke with Ed Mazur by phone this morning and Chip Gerlock, Mike Reynolds and I met with Scoff Doster this afternoon regarding the subject application. As I now understand, the easement was granted to the property owner to the north of the project to provide for the discharge from his property. The easement grants no rights to convey the drainage from the south to the City system. My concern all along has been the potential for backwater to the south as a result of the proposed 24-inch culvert replacing an open channel ditch. Since the existing easement does not address this issue, a new condition has been added that requires a demonstration that the proposed stormwater system is designed to adequately convey this water from the south. With this new condition, my concern is being addressed. Chip contacted Leslie Dougal-Sides and requested a legal opinion on the release of the private easement. Her advice was that since the project does not propose structures in the easement, the requirement for release of the easement is not necessary. This condition is therefore going to be deleted. Please let me know if these changes causes any problems for you. Thanks, D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com ater, .0e, gCover Memoraldum Page 1 of 1 P , c r City Council Preferred Date:6-17-2004 -Subject / Recommendation: Item ID: 622 Latest Possible Date: 06-17-2004 Submitted: 05-24-2004 Actual Date: _ __.,. Approve the applicant's request to vacate that portion of the 60-foot right-of-way of Jasmine Way that lies between Block 28 and Block 33 of Magnolia Park Subdivision, subject to the vacation becoming effective upon transfer of ownership of the adjoining property to GWI Investments or its assignee and also subject to the condition that the vacation shall become null and of no effect if all certificates of occupancy are not obtained for the development known as Jasmine Way Townhomes within 24 months from the date of second -Summary: c py si- y?uo - a ]* The applicant is requesting the vacation in order to redevelop the adjoining property ! into a townhouse development to be known as Jasmine Way Townhomes. * The property is presently developed with 25 residential units, proposed is a 45 unit townhome development. * Progress Energy, Verizon, Bright House Cable and Knology Broadband of Florida have no objections to the vacation request. r a 1 * The City of Clearwater presently has storm, water and sanitary sewer facilites in the right-of-way to be vacated. * New easements will be required to protect access to these facilites as needed as part of '. the platting process for Jasmine Way Townhomes. * The preliminary plat and site plan for Jasmine Way Townhomes is scheduled for review as a flexible development case by the Community Development Board on June 15, 2004. * Public Works Adminstration has no objections to the vacation request provided that the vacation will become null and void if the certificates of occupancy for the Jasmine Way I Townhome project are not obtained within 24 months of the date of second reading of this request. Originating Department Engineering Category: Vacation of Easements and Rights of Way Number of Hard Copies attached: Public Hearing: i ' S ..._._ Advertised Dates: 05 3072004 ] 16-06-2004 -Review Approval: (Signature indicates approval.) t { 's 31 1 Reynolds, Mike From: Rice, Scoff Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 2:57 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003; 504 Jasmine Way; Jasmine Way Townhomes Mike Engineering has completed review of the resubmittal. The only issue is that the dimensions for the proposed parallel parking spaces are no longer on the plans. It appears that a CAD layer may have been inadvertently turned off. I have a call into Ed Mazur regarding this. This is not sufficient to hold up the project. Permit Plan has been updated accordingly. D. Scott Rice Land Deve% Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Reynolds, Mike Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 8:27 AM To: Bahnick, Glen; Barker, Brian A.; Bertels, Paul; Blackburn, Anne; Carrier, Al; Colbert, Joseph; Elbo, Bennett; Finch, Terry; Gerlock, Chip; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Hufford, Diane; Maran, Robert (Bob); Martens, Cory; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Planning; Rice, Scott; Richter, Debbie; Shoberg, Elliot E.; Yellin, Catherine Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003; 504 Jasmine Way; Jasmine Way Townhomes DRC members, Please let me know if you have any comments regarding the revisions made since the May 6 DRC meeting. A review application plan set copy is at the file cabinets behind my cubicle. If you need to borrow the set, leave an out card. You will need to return the set as it will be used for the CDB routing. This application is scheduled before the CDB on June 15, 2004. Mike Reynolds, AICP, Senior Planner City of Clearwater - 727-562-4836 mike.reynolds@mvclearwater.com Ocommunity Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. o<4 J ? Meeting Date: Location: ? Current Use: ?ng?e t ? Active Code Enforcement Cas (no) es: VAddress number (y ) (no) (vacant land) Landscaping Oyes (no) (D K vergrown (yes) o) O X Debris (yes) o) inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) o) G? uilding(s) (oo (fair) (poor) (vacant land) ,,e-'Fencing (none) oo (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ,,e- Paint good (fair) (poor) (garish) Grass Parking (yes e6 j Residential Parking Violations (yes ? ?Signage -non (ok) (not ok) (billboard) /'p-- Parking (n/a) ripe ) (handicapped) (needs repaving) , Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) =- CA,4 S ,e--'Outdoor storage (yes) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Dater )-616q Reviewed bY: ham/ l Telephone: J ? 41 a 5 Revised 03 9-01'; 02-04-03 Cle,arwater U_ 0 AGENDA r Revised 06/15/2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 Time: 2:00 p.m. Place: 112 South Osceola Street, 3rd Floor, Clearwater, Florida, 33756 (City Hall Council Chambers) Welcome the City of Clearwater Community Development Board (CDB) meeting. The City strongly supports and fully complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Please advise.us at least 72 hours prior to the meeting if you require special accommodations. Assisted listening devices are available. An oath will be administered swearing in all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Kindly refrain from conducting private conversations, using beepers, cellular telephones, etc. that are distracting during the meeting. Florida Statue 286.0105 states: Any person appealing a decision of this Board must have a record of the proceedings to support such appeal. Community Development Code Section 4- 206 requires that any person seeking to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witness, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests should request party status during the case discussion. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. If you have questions or concerns about a case, please contact the staff presenter from the Planning Department listed at the end of each agenda item at 727-562-4567. * Make Us Your Favorite! www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning A. B. CALL TO ORDER, INVOCATION, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Chair Hooper, Vice Chair Doran, Members Gildersleeve, Milam, Moran, Plisko, Alternate Member (Dennehy), City Staff Community Development Board Consent Agenda - June 15, 2004 - Page 1 of 6 C. APPROVAL OF 1VIINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING?Jviay 18 2004 t D. CONSENT AGENDA: The following cases are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. and will be approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting (Items 1-5): 1. Case: FLD2004-02008 - 926 South Myrtle Avenue Level Two Application Owner/Applicant: Patrick J. Shaughnessy and Sheryl M. Haynes. Representative: Roger A. Larson (phone: 727-461-1818; fax: 727-462-0365; email: r_gerWJpfirm.com). Location: 1.36 acres located at the northeast corner of Myrtle Avenue and Magnolia Street, approximately 200 feet south of Druid Road. Atlas Page: 295B. Zoning District: Commercial (C). Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a proposed medical clinic in addition to an existing 33 bed assisted living facility, as a mixed-use, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use (assisted living facility and medical clinic). Neighborhood Association(s): None. Presenter: Bryan S. Berry, Planner II. 2. Case: FLD2003-12069/TDR2003-12005 -190 Brightwater Drive Level Two Application Owner/Applicant: Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC. Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036; email: nestech(a,mindspring.com). Location: 0.31 acres located on the north side of Brightwater Drive, approximately 1400 feet east of Hamden Drive. Atlas Page: 276A. Zoning District: Tourist (T). Request: Flexible Development to permit attached dwellings with reductions to the front bV (south) setback from 15 feet to 14.5 feet (to building) and from 15 feet to 4.2 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback from 10 feet to 7.5 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to pool deck and sidewalk), reductions to the side (west) ? f setback from 10 feet to 8.3 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), t a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck and boardwalk) and to increase the building height from 35 feet to 45.08 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 feet (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional 14.25 feet (from roof deck for a roof top pavillion), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining six existing boat slips and one existing dock for sole use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 620 Bayway Boulevard, under the provisions of Section 4-1403. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (10 condominium units). Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email: dmacnavQatt.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. Community Development Board Consent Agenda - June 15, 2004 - Page 2 of 6 1 Level *pplication 3. Case: FLD2004-O1ZT02/TDR2004-01006 -15-17 Somerset Street and 16 Cambria Street Owner: Husgen Properties, Inc. Applicant: Aqua Sun Development, LLC. Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036; email: nestechAmindspring com). Location: 0.39 acres located approximately 200 feet west of Mandalay Avenue between Somerset Street and Cambria Street. Atlas Page: 258A. Zoning District: Medium High Density Residential (MHDR). Request: Flexible Development approval for (1) attached dwellings (13 condominium units) with reductions to the front setback (north along Somerset Street) from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building and pavement) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the front setback (south along Cambria Street) from 25 feet to 21 feet (to building) and from 25 feet to 19 feet (to balconies), reductions to the front setback (west along Beach Drive - unimproved) from 25 feet to 19 feet (to building), from 25 feet to 17 feet (to balconies) and from 25 feet to zero feet (to pool deck), a reduction to the side setback (west) from 10 feet to eight feet (to balconies), an increase to the building height from 30 feet to 61.66 feet (to roof deck) with an additional four feet (from roof deck) for perimeter parapets and an additional eight feet (from roof deck) for decorative roof-top trellises, an increase to the height of a decorative fence within the front setback along Somerset Street (north) and Beach Drive (west - unimproved) from three feet to six feet and to permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.17, (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset Street (north) from 10 feet to zero feet (to dumpster staging area) and along Beach Drive (west - unimproved) from 10 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) as a Comprehensive Landscape Program; under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G, and (3) the Transfer of Development Rights for two dwelling units from 674 Bayway Boulevard, under the provisions of Section 4-1403. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (13 condominium units). Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email: dmacnav(a)att.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. Community Development Board Consent Agenda - June 15, 2004 - Page 3 of 6 4. Case: FLD2004-0& / PLT2004-00003 - 504 Jasmine W Level Two Application Owner: E. Joyln, In ., Craig Murtha and Robert Resnik. Applicant: GWI Investments, Inc. Representative: GWI Investments (2510 W Prospect Rd, Tampa, Fl 33629; phone: 813- 258-5240, fax: 813-258-5241; email: gwiggy(d,tampabay.rr.com Location: 2.59 acres located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue, generally south of Cleveland Street. Atlas Page: 295B. Zoning Districts: Commercial (C); Office (O). Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B and Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (45 units). Neighborhood Association: Harbor Oaks Association; (Margaret Hightower, 301 Druid Road West, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 727-447-8081). Presenter: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. 5. Case: FLD2003-11057 - 514 South Gulfview Boulevard Level Two Application Owner: ACS Resorts Inc. Applicant: Bob Lyons, Dalton Clearwater LLC. Representative: Bill Woods, Woods Consulting, Inc (322 Ridge Road, Palm Harbor, FL 34683: phone: 727786-5747; fax:727-786-7479; email: billwoods(gwoodsconsulting.org). Location: 1.54 acres located on the north side of Gulfview Boulevard, south of Clearwater Harbor, approximately 100 feet south of the intersection of Hamden Drive and South Gulfview Boulevard. Atlas Page: 276A. l? Zoning District: Tourist (T). Request: Flexible Development approval to construct a 19-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601. Proposed Use: A 19-slip multi-use dock as part of an attached dwelling development. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email: dmacnav@att.net). Presenter: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. Community Development Board Consent Agenda - June 15, 2004 - Page 4 of 6 E. REQUESTS FO*NTINUANCE ITEMS (Items 1-2) 0 1. Case: FLD2004-01004/TDR2004-01007 - 638-650 Poinsettia Avenue Level Two App. Owner: DiDomizio Investments, Inc. Applicant: Roger's Beach Development. Representative: Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. (601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930, Clearwater, FL 33755; phone: 727-443-2869; fax: 727-446-8036; email: nestecligmindspring.com). Location: 0.701 acres located at the northwest corner of Poinsettia Avenue and Royal Way. Atlas Page: 258A. Zoning District: Tourist (T). Request: Flexible Development approval to permit an overnight accommodations use of 33 total units with a reduction to lot width from 150 feet to 102 feet (along Royal Way), reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to pavement) and from 15 feet to four feet (to dumpster staging area) and to increase the building height from 35 feet to 74.67 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Section 2-803.I, and the Transfer of Development Rights for five units from 200 Brightwater Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1403. Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations (33 total units). Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email: dmacnav(a-datt.net). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. 2. Case: FLD2004-02006 - 1315 South Fort Harrison Avenue Level Two Application Owner/Applicant: Corbett Development, Inc. Representative: F. Blake Longacre (phone: 727-446-5846; fax: 727-446-1296; email: f bldev@,tampabay. rr. com). Location: 0.34-acres located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue, approximately 300 feet north of Lakeview Road. Atlas Page: 305B. Zoning District: Industrial Research Technology (IRT). Request: Flexible Development approval to reduce: the minimum lot size from 20,000 square feet to 14,850 square feet, the front (west) setback along South Fort Harrison Avenue from 20 feet to 15 feet to pavement, the front (south) setback along "B" Street from 20 feet to 13 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), the side (north) setback from 15 feet to five feet (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), for an office, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. Proposed Use: A 2,044 square feet office. Neighborhood Association: None. Presenter: Bryan S. Berry, Planner II. Community Development Board Consent Agenda - June 15, 2004 - Page 5 of 6 V • F. CONTINUED ITEIS (Items 1-2): Level Three Application 1. Case: CPA2004-04001 Amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan. Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department. Request: Amendment to the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan revising Policy 2.1.4 of the Future Land Use Plan Element with regard to the areas eligible for the density pool of additional hotel rooms established in Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email: dmacnav@att.net). Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager. 2. Case: Amendment to Beach by Design Special Area Plan Level Three Application Applicant: City of Clearwater, Planning Department. Request: Amendments to Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines revising the areas eligible for the resort density pool, the timeframe the resort density pool is available and the characteristics which make a project eligible for the pool. Neighborhood Association: Clearwater Beach Association (David MacNamee, 827 Mandalay Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33767; phone: 727-446-5801; email: dmacnav(a att.net). Presenter: Gina L. Clayton, Long Range Planning Manager. G. LEVEL TWO APPLICATION (Item 1): 1. Case: FLD2004-03019 - 1339, 1341 and 1345 Park Street and 1344 Pierce Street Owner: Society of St. Vincent DePaul of Upper Pinellas County. Applicant: Clearwater Homeless Intervention Project, Inc. Representative: Nina Bandoni, Turnstone Properties, Inc. (2519 McMullen Booth Road, Suite 510-126, Clearwater, FL 33761; phone: 727-712-1196; fax: 727-723-9221; email: nina@turnstoneproperties.com). Location: 1.3 acres located at the terminus of Park Street, approximately 250 feet west of Evergreen Avenue. Atlas Page: 287B. Zoning Districts: Commercial (C) (0.832 acres); Medium Density Residential (MDR) (0.472 acres). Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 378 square-foot expansion of a residential shelter for the purpose of increasing the number of beds from 48 to 62, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Commercial (C) District, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C (existing parking lot on Pierce Street is zoned MDR District and is not proposed to be modified). Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing residential shelter. Neighborhood Association: Gateway Neighborhood (Paul Charles, 1367 Park Street, Clearwater, FL 33756; phone: 813-205-8779). Presenter: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. H. DIRECTOR'S ITEM: Update On The Downtown Design Guidelines 1. ADJOURNMENT IIMS5ctPDSIPlanning DepartinentlCD Blagendas DRC & CDBICDBI2004106 June 15, 20041CDB Consent Agenda June 15, 2004.doc Community Development Board Consent Agenda - June 15, 2004 - Page 6 of 6 r a CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, June 15, 2004, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Avenue, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Patrick J. Shaughnessy & Sheryl M. Haynes are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a proposed medical clinic to occupy 7,971 sq ft within an existing building in association with an existing 32 bed Congregate Care facility for mixed use as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2.704.C. (Proposed Use: Mixed use [assisted living facility and medical clinic]) at 926 South Myrtle Ave., Magnolia Park, Blk 31, Lots 2-9 inclusive less road. FLD2004-02008 2. Corbett Development, Inc. are requesting a Flexible Development approval to reduce: the minimum lot size from 20,000 sq ft to 14,850 sq ft, the front (west) setback along South Ft. Harrison Ave. from 20 ft to 15 ft to pavement, the front (south) setback along B Street from 20 ft to 13 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), the side (north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), the side (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), for an office, under the provisions of Section 2-1304.C as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. (Proposed Use: A 2,048 sq ft office) at 1315 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., Belleair, Blk 13, Lots 9-11 & W '/2 vacated alley. FLD2004-02006 3. Society of St. Vincent DePaul of Upper Pinellas County (Clearwater Homeless Intervention Project, Inc.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a 378 sq ft expansion of a residential shelter for the purpose of increasing the number of beds from 48 to 62, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Commercial [C] District, under the provisions of Section 2-704.C (existing parking lot on Pierce St. is zoned MHDR District and is not proposed to be modified). (Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing residential shelter) at 1339, 1341 & 1345 Park St. and 1344 Pierce St., Brookwood Terrace Rev., Blk 6, Pt Lots 1-2 & Lots 9-13 & N'/z vacated St.; Overbrook, Blk 6, Lots 7-10; and Tagarelli Sub., Blk 2, E50' of Lot 2, Lot 4, Lot 3 & W14' of Lot 2. FLD2004-03019 4. Twin Palms of Clearwater, LLC are requesting a Flexible Development to permit attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 14.5 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to 4.2 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) from 10 ft to 7.5 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 3 ft (to pool deck and sidewalk), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the rear (north) from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck and boardwalk) and to increase the building height from 35 ft to 45.08 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft (from roof deck for perimeter parapets) and an additional 14.25 ft (from roof deck for a roof top pavilion), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C (retaining six existing boat slips and one existing dock for sole use by the property owners) and the Transfer of Development Rights for one dwelling unit from 620 Bayway Blvd., under the provisions of Section 4-1403. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [10 condominium units]) at 190 Brightwater Dr., Bayside Sub. No. 2, Lots 34 & 35. FLD2003-12069 5. Husun Properties, Inc. (Aqua Sun Development, LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval for (1) attached dwelling (13 condominium units) with reductions to the front setback (north along Somerset St.) from 25 ft to 10 ft (to building and pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the front setback (south along Cambria St.) from 25 ft to 21 ft (to building) and from 25 ft to 19 ft (to balconies), reductions to the front setback (west along Beach Dr. - unimproved) from 25 ft to 19 ft (to building), from 25 ft to 17 ft (to balconies) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), a reduction to the side setback (west) from 10 ft to 8 ft (to balconies), and increase to the building height from 30 ft to 61.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4 ft (from roof deck) for perimeter parapets and an additional 8 ft (from roof deck) for decorative roof-top trellises, an increase to the height of a decorative fence within the front setback along Somerset St (north) and Beach Dr. (west - unimproved) from 3 ft to 6 ft and to permit a building within the required sight visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Section 2-404.17, (2) to permit a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset St. (north) from 10 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging area) and along Beach Dr. (west - unimproved) from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3- 1202.G, and (3) the Transfer of Development Rights for two dwelling units from 674 Bayway Blvd. Under the provisions of Section 4-1403 (Proposed Use: Attached dwelling [13 condominium units]) at 15-17 Somerset St & 16 Cambria St. Clearwater Beach Revised, Blk 2, Lot 14 & Lots 3-5 & & Rip rights. FLD2004-01.002 6. DiDomizio Investments, Inc. (Roger's Beach Development) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit an overnight accommodations use of 33 total units with a reduction to lot width from 150 ft to 102 ft (along Royal Way), reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 4 ft (to dumpster staging area) and to increase the building height from 35 ft to 74.67 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Section 2-803.I, and the Transfer of Development Rights for 5 units from 200 Brightwater Dr., under the provisions of Section 4-1403. (Proposed Use: Overnight accommodations [33 total units]) at 638-650 Poinsettia Ave., Mandalay Unit No. 5, Blk 84A, Lots 16-20. FLD2004-01004 7. E. Jolyn Inc. / Craig J. Murtha / Robert Resnik (GWI Investments, Inc.) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 ft to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 ft to building, 3 ft to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 ft to building, 4 ft to the paver driver aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 ft to building, and 3 ft to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 ft to building, and a building height of 36.98 ft as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.13 and Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [45 units]) at 504 Jasmine Way, Magnolia Park, Blk 28, Lots 4-8; Magnolia Park, Blk 33, Lots 1-2 & 9-11; and Sec 16-29-15, M&B 44.01. FLD2004- 03017 8. ACS Resorts, Inc. (Bob Lyons - Dalton Clearwater, LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to construct a 19-slip multi-use dock, under the provisions of Section 3-601. (Proposed Use: a 19-slip multi-use dock as part of an attached dwelling development) at 514 S. Gulfview Blvd., Bayside Sub No 5, Blk A, Lots 1-5. FLD2003-11057 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearings. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request and obtain party status by the Board during the case discussion, a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Section 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board if person requesting such demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to: personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests. An oath will be administered swearing all participants in public hearing cases. If you wish to speak please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact Frank Gerlock, Development Review Manager, at 562-4557 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. This notice was sent by the Official Records and Legislative Services Department, Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC, City Clerk Lisa Fierce Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC Planning Department City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FT. OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL THE OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES DEPT WITH THEIR REQUEST AT (727) 562-4090. Ad: 05/30/04 TWEAN SUBSIDIARY 2,600 MCCORMICK DR STE 255 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - TURNER, AMBER V TURNER, GERALDINE C 801 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 JOLYN, E INC 504 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - JOLYN, E INC 504 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PINELLAS COUNTY ATTN: ENGINEERING R/W 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 MURTHA, CRAIG J THE MAGNOLIA LAND TRUST 1/23/97 504 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3940 JANNELLI, GILBERT G 909 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 MURTHA, CRAIG J 901 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - MORELLI, VIRGINIA 507 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3934 MORELLI, VIRGINIA 507 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3934 FULLER, JOYCE E THE 639 PONCE DE LEON BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1018 HARRITY, MICHELLE 803 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901 JOLYN, E INC 504 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - MINES, JONATHAN MINES, CARLEN 505 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3909 MORELLI, VIRGINIA 507 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3934 WAYLAND, ROBERT E CHALACHE, NAJEH F 905 S FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY 607 W BAY ST TAMPA FL 33606 - MURTHA, CRAIG J 901 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - LOTUSLAND 1055 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3905 MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC FINANCE DEPT MS 102 PO BOX 210 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210 BOTANICAL & HERBAL RESOURCES 1465 S FT HARRISON AVE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - ULLER, JOYCE E THE 639 PONCE DE LEON BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1018 JOLYN, E INC 504 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PINELLAS COUNTY ATTN: ENGINEERING R/W 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 MURTHA, CRAIG J 901 S FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY 607 W BAY ST TAMPA FL 33606 - MURTHA, CRAIG J 901 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - MORELLI, VIRGINIA 507 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3934 MORELLI, VIRGINIA 507 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3934 FAZZINA, THOMAS A FAZZINA, SHIRLEY S 1780 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1708 C S M PROPERTIES PTNSHP 508 JEFFORDS ST # C CLEARWATER FL 33756 - RESNIK, ROBERT 3517 SHORELINE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 FL DEPT OF TRANS C/O PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 C S M PROPERTIES PTNSHP 508 JEFFORDS ST STE C CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3839 RESNIK, ROBERT 3517 SHORELINE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 DRUHILL PROFESSIONAL CENTER CONDO ASSN DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 qAMMESFAHR FAMILY LAND TRUST 600 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 ROCKWELL, JOY ENTERPRISES INC 1000 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3906 DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRUID ROAD 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 HEYE, HANS F 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 HEYE, HANS F SPOTO, PETER J NEI INC 611 DRUID RD E STE 200 SPOTO, FERNE J 5146 KERNWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946 535 PALMETTO RD PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3617 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1435 NEI INC 5146 KERNWOOD CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3617 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 PERFECTLY BALANCED BOOKS INC 611 DRUID RD E # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CREDITIQ INC 611 DRUID RD STE 403 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - TULLY, JOE TULLY, CYNTHIA 611 DRUID RD # 407 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - RODRIGUEZ, ROSALIA C 418 LEEWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2309 FLORIDA ADVOCACY & COORDINATION TEAM INC 611 DRUID RD # 511 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3942 CSX TRANSPORTATION INC ATTN: TAX DEPT J-910 500 WATER ST JACKSONVILLE FL 32202 - 4423 PANTELIDES, GUS K 611 DRUID RD # 703 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 PEFTIER, COLETTE P RR 2 BOX 110 OTTAWA ON K2C 3H1 00030 - CANADA KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 PERFECTLY BALANCED BOOKS INC 611 DRUID RD E # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CREDITIQ INC 611 DRUID RD STE 403 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - TULLY, JOE TULLY, CYNTHIA 611 DRUID RD # 407 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - TUCKER, SHERWOOD S TUCKER, LINDA A 2107 FREDERIC CIR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2354 BAY REAL ESTATE INVESTORS WEISS, MARY L THE 2040 NE COACHMAN RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2614 NACOL, T PATRICK NACOL, BARBARA K 611 DRUID RD E # 711 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931 FERRARA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS 611 DRUID RD E # 704 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 DAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - PERFECTLY BALANCED BOOKS INC 611 DRUID RD E # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CREDITIQ INC 611 DRUID RD STE 403 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CARPENTER, JAY E CARPENTER, JANA Q 612 HARBOR IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1801 CARPENTER, JAY E CARPENTER, JANA Q 612 HARBOR IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1801 PANTELIDES, GUS K 611 DRUID RD E # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 FKMS 509 HARBOR DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3253 PANTELIDES, GUS K 611 DRUID RD E # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939 PANTELIDES, GUS PHILLIPS, CRAIG PHILLIPS, CRAIG 611 DRUID RD E # 706 PHILLIPS, PEGGY PHILLIPS, PEGGY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3959 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 611 DRUID RD E STE 105 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - PHILLIPS, CRAIG S PHILLIPS, PEGGY L 3716 MCKAY CREEK DR LARGO FL 33770 - BATT, HOWARD C 611 DRUID RD E # 712 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 TAGGART, JANE K 401 HAMILTON CRES CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5330 PARKS, ERIC D PARKS, RENEE A 714 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5304 MC KEOWN, RUTH E THE 432 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3817 MIDDLETON, BRUCE T VAN BUREN, CAROL P 427 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854 KESKINER, AYDIN D 420 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3812 0 VISION ARCHITECTURE & DEV C/O WANG, HSIU YU 338 N BAY HILLS BLVD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 SZABO, BRUCE 611 DRUID RD E STE 717 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 KIRBY, JOHN O KIRBY, ANNE 1433 RANCHWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33764 - PARKS, ERIC D PARKS, RENEE A 714 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5304 MYERS, BRADLEY A MYERS, ANITA K 433 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854 BURROUGHS, DOROTHY J 422 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3817 STANLEY, HAROLD N STANLEY, GYNETH S 421 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854 'RATT, HOWARD C 611 DRUID RD E # 712 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 SZABO, BRUCE 611 DRUID RD E STE 717 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947 KEDAN, ELLA THE 2354 HADDON HALL PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510 PINELLAS DENTAL ARTS C/O PINELLAS DENTAL ARTS PA 650 E TARPON AVE TARPON SPRINGS FL 34689 - SUBRAMANIAN, ARUNACHALAM SUBRAMANIAN, VALLI 800 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3902 MAC LEAN, KEMMIT C MAC LEAN, KIMBERLY D 430 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3817 WRIGHT, OLIN S III WRIGHT, TONI 423 DRUID RD W CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854 SUBRAMANIAN, ARUNACHALAM SUBRAMANIAN, VALLI 8321 73RD CT PINELLAS PARK FL 33781 - HEMERICK, F DAVID MARSH, EDWARD STEVENS, KAREN 902 S FORT HARRISON AVE 430 JASMINE WAY 424 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 TEMME, R WAYNE 421 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 DURKEE, KEITH W DURKEE, PHYLLIS L 416 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 GATZA, JAMES W GATZA, JULIE L 410 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 ROCKWELL, JOY ENTERPRISES INC 1000 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3906 HAKSAR, MANJULA HAKSAR, KRISHNA N 424 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 PENNY, KENNETH E JR GOSCIN-PENNY, LEE 4598 CLEARWATER HARBOR DR LARGO FL 33770 - CLAY, CHRISTINE 424 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 DIMMITT CAR LEASING INC 25191 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2102 HARBOR OAKS DEV 1801 S KEENE RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - *WAGSTAFF, MARY LOU 418 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 TOLAN, DONALD J TOLAN, MAUREEN 417 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 DESAI, ANUP DESAI, CHHAYA 908 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 HEYE, ANNETTE S PO BOX 667 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0667 BROWN, KENNETH P BROWN, BRENDA 423 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 CONKLIN, LESLIE M CONKLIN, DEBRA S 430 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 DEXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 DIMMITT CAR LEASING INC 25191 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2102 HARBOR OAKS DEV 1801 S KEENE RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - #PROBST, AUGUSTA A 419 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 LAZANIS, JULIA M THE 415 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DESAI, ANUP DESAI, CHHAYA 908 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 MC QUIGG, MICHAEL C MC QUIGG, EUGENIA F 429 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - CLINE, HARRY S CLINE, JANE M 414 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 WICKERSHAM, HERBERT F WICKERSHAM, M ANN 428 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 DEXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 HARBOR OAKS DEV 1801 S KEENE RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - SOUTHTRUST BANK 220 WILDWOOD PKWY BIRMINGHAM AL 35209 - 7154 DIMMITT CAR LEASING INC DIMMITT CAR LEASING INC DIMMITT CAR LEASING INC 25191 US HIGHWAY 19 N 25191 US HIGHWAY 19 N 25191 US HIGHWAY 19 N CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2102 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2102 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2102 RESNIK, ROBERT 3517 SHORELINE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 1727 MC CLURE, MICHAEL W MC CLURE, SANDRA K 2210 DONATO DR BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - Harbor Oaks Association Margaret Hightower 301 Druid Rd. W. Clearwater, FL 33756 IkEXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - GWI Investments, Inc. 2510 W. Prospect Rd. Tampa, FL 33629 'REXTER PROPERTIES 612 DRUID RD E CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3912 Greg Iglehart, Scott Doster, Ed Armstrong 2510 W. Prospect Rd. Tampa, FL 33629 F7 Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: /zv6 FAX: c" Phone: FROM: ll?? ??vit.cl /Gl?_Phone: DATE: 6 SUBJECT: AG1 v - C236 l r2 /J oy -- oc-, vo3 MESSAGE: 66w NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) CDB Meeting Date: June 15, 2004 Case Number: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 Agenda Item: E7 Owner/Applicant: E Joyln Inc. Craig Murtha and Robert Resnik Representative: GWI Investments (2510 W Prospect Rd Tampa F133629• phone: 813-258- 5240 fax: 813-258-5241• email: gwiagy@tampabay.rr.com Address: 504 Jasmine Way CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right- of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. EXISTING ZONING/LAND USE: C, Commercial District and O, Office District; CG, Commercial General Category and R/OG Residential/Office General District PROPERTY SIZE: 2.59 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Attached multi-family residential units Proposed Use: Attached multi-family residential units ADJACENT ZONING/LAND USES: North: Office District, Commercial District, and Downtown District; Residential and Commercial East: Office District; Offices South: Office District and Commercial District; Offices West: Office District; Commercial and Offices CHARACTER OF THE Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 1 a • IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Commercial, office, and residential uses dominate the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 2.59-acre overall site is located on the east side of South Fort Harrison Avenue and south of Druid Road. Jasmine Way is an existing City of Clearwater cul-de-sac right-of-way, approximately 270 feet in length. The cul-de-sac intersects with South Fort Harrison Avenue. At the rear of the cul-de-sac is a towering large tree. Beyond the tree to the east is an existing chain link fence and the Pinellas Trail. The site consists of a mix of housing types and styles that line Jasmine Way. With the exception of an existing surface parking lot, the site has considerable vegetation. Some pedestrian access to existing units is on South Fort Harrison Avenue and some access is from Jasmine Way. There are existing concrete sidewalks here. The architecture of the existing buildings is varied and some of it is attractive. Among the structures are a small cottage with a front porch, a bungalow-style house, and a house with columns and French doors facing the street. According to the site plan, there are 25 residential dwelling units existing on site. The existing site is pedestrian friendly with sidewalk connections to South Fort Harrison Avenue. Neighboring the site is a doctor's office, dentist, a tax service, other offices, and a clothing store. East of the site is an office park and the Pinellas Trail. Druid Road frames a small portion of the site, to the north. Proposal: The applicant is proposing preliminary plat approval for 45 lots. The proposal includes a right of way vacation for a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Proposed for new construction are 45 attached residential units. All of the existing structures are to be removed or demolished. The proposed development includes a swimming pool, sidewalks, and a pedestrian way to the Pinellas Trail. The site is to be well landscaped. Building height, for the highest building,-proposed is 36.98 feet from finished floor to mid point of the roof. The maximum density at this site is 46 units. The site plan indicates that each residential unit will have a two-car garage. The site plan shows 11 additional parking spaces on-site. Vehicular access to the site is via South Fort Harrison Avenue only. There is pedestrian connectivity both in terms of internal walkways and access to both South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail. Solid waste collection is by individual unit waste pick-up. The site plan set includes landscape and irrigation plans, and a tree survey/mitigation plan. What is proposed can be briefly summarized in three parts: (1) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment to allow for 45 residential attached units in Office and Commercial zoning districts, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way. The Comprehensive Infill proposal includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program application. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 2 0 0 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1,2-704,2-1001.1 .,.,A 7_1 MAI STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT IMPERVIOUS 0.71 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) (0.95 maximum, CG; 0.75 maximum, R/OG) Note: Residential attached units are not a permitted land use within the Commercial and Office zoning districts. As such, there are no other standards to apply to the proposal, which is a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment proposal. /"11111L a-nT i 1?T/"?T 771TTU LET LoVTDT7 TTV 1"11DTrV DT A lQnn+inne 727(?d r and 2_1 nn4-M! Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses of mix of X uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development, as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 3 to 9 n?rRnr i A ATl?L` [a7Tmu !' VXTT. D AT Q7' A 1VTl A 1D"Q fQnr4inn 2_91 ?l? Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting on May 6, 2004. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, 3 feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, 4 feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2- 10043 and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3-1202.G. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2. That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way, and the release of the existing north to south nine-foot drainage easement; 3. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 4 • 4. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 5. Revise mitigation counts for all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 6. Provide a revised landscape plan (to address tree height/caliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), for consideration and approval by staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 7. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: /it/ Mr?e 'y Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application SAPlanning DepartmenAC D S\FLEX\Pending caseMp for the next CDBVasmine Way 504 Jasmine Way Townhomes (C and O)Vasmine Way 504 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - June 15, 2004 - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - Page 5 s Jun. 14 2004 04:12PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620498 Jun.14 04:10PM 02'19 SND 06 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #184. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. REC'EONFID MAN ? 4 2UU4 ?Y OF CL`' " ; LI JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MASTER DRAINAGE REPORT March 2004 Prepared for: GWI Investments, Inc. 2510 Prospect Road Tampa, FL 33629 Prepared by: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard. New Port Richey, FL 34655 Job 699-203.30.02 a ,l . Jeffrey.*y ?K'AR 2 ;3 2004 .,•;? iLP.t574 5`? TABLE OF CONTENTS ' NARRATIVE General ' Soil Survey Information Flood Zone Information Existing Conditions Proposed Conditions Operation and Maintenance ' EXISTING CONDITIONS • Summary • Existing Conditions - Basin Characteristics - Off-Site Basin Characteristics • AdICPR Model (25 Year/ 24 Hour Storm Event) - Hydrologic Report - Basin Summary ' PROPOSED CONDITIONS • Summary • Developed Conditions - Basin Characteristics 1 - Off-Site Basin Characteristics - Attenuation Volume - Treatment Volume ' - Pond Volumes • AdICPR Model (25 Year/24 Hour Storm Event) - Input Report - Hydrologic Report - Basin Summary - Routing Report - Node Min/Max • Storm Drainage Tabulation Form ' • AdICPR Model (10 Year/24 Hour Storm Event) - Hydrologic Report - Basin Summary - Routing Report - Node Min/Max ' • Side-Drain Filter Drawdown Analysis ATTACHMENTS ' • Location Map • USGS Map ' • Aerial Photograph • SCS Soils Survey Data • FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map • Operation and Maintenance Guidelines • Geotechnical Report (as provided by Nordarse & Associates, Inc.) • Letter Report of Infiltration Test Results (as provided by Nodarse & Associates, Inc.) NARRATIVE ' General: JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES MASTER DRAINAGE REPORT NARRATIVE The proposed Jasmine Way Townhomes project is located on approximately 2.6 acre site that lies within the jurisdiction of the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida (Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 15 East). The site is bounded by Druid Road to the north, an existing office park to the south, the Pinellas Trail tract to the east and South Ft. Harrison to the west. (See attached Location Map, USGS Map and aerial photograph). The proposed project consists of the construction of 45 three-story townhomes, divided into seven (7) ' separate buildings. The project will also include the construction of a pool area as well as drive aisles, additional parking spaces, sanitary sewer system, potable water system, irrigation system and the required treatment pond and stormwater system. Soil Survey Information: ' According to the SCS Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida, the soil types found on-site are Urban Land (Ub) and Urban Land - Astatula Complex (Uc). Urban Land (Ub) consist of areas where the original soil has been generally modified or altered for urban development. Urban facilities, including paved parking areas, streets, houses and underground utilities have been constructed on the majority of these areas. Major soils properties have been overcome by an acceptable extent. Urban Land - Astatula Complex (Uc) is about 30% - 70% Astatula fine sand, of which 10% - 20% has been modified by ' cutting, grading or shaping for urban areas. (See attached SCS Soils Information). Flood Zone Information: According to FEMA Flood Zone Information Rate Map Number 12103C0108G, Community Panel Number 1250960108G, effective date September 3, 2003, the project site lies within Flood Zone X. Flood Zone X is defined as areas determined to be outside the 500-year flood plain. Existing Conditions: The project site currently exists as residential property. There are several residential buildings on-site consisting of both one and two story structures. There is one main entrance road off of Ft. Harrison, ' which dead ends at a cul-de-sac. There is a common paved parking area and two gravel parking areas on-site. ' The existing land generally slopes from west to east. Near the eastern boundary of the property, there is an existing upland cut ditch that runs parallel to the Pinellas Trail. The ditch carries overland flow from ' the existing site, as well as approximately 2.15-acres of offsite flows from the south. The ditch also receives discharge from an existing outfall control structure located behind the medical offices located at the corner of Ft. Harrison and Druid Road. The flows accumulated within this ditch ultimately outfall into the existing stormwater system that runs along the south side of Druid Road. K:Vasmine Way\ReportsWaster Drainage Report.doc I Proposed Conditions: The proposed Jasmine Way Townhomes project consists of the construction of 45 three-story townhomes, divided into seven (7) separate buildings. The project will also include the construction of a pool area as well as drive aisles, additional parking spaces, sanitary sewer system, potable water system, irrigation system and the required treatment pond and stormwater system. The required stormwater treatment and attenuation will be provided in one (1) proposed pond. The pond is located in the northernmost portion of the property. Treatment is provided for the first one-half inch (1/2") of runoff over the proposed project site, as well as the first one-half inch (1/2") of runoff over the off-site basin to the south that discharges to the existing ditch. The ditch will be filled and the runoff will be routed through the proposed stormwater system. Pursuant to the Pre-Application Meeting held with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), there is no water quality compensation required for the existing ditch. The proposed pond will discharge into the existing stormwater system that runs along the south side of Druid Road. ¦ Operation and Maintenance: ' The owner of the property will be responsible for the proposed stormwater management system. Attached is a copy of the letter outlining the operation and maintenance responsibilities that was mailed to the owner. K:Vasmine Way\Reports\NIastcr Drainage Report.doc EXISTING CONDITIONS I Existing Conditions: Summary The project site currently exists as residential property. There are several residential buildings on-site consisting of both one and two story structures. There is one main entrance road off of Ft. Harrison, which dead ends at a cul-de-sac. There is a common paved parking area and two gravel parking areas onsite. The existing land generally slopes from west to east. Near the eastern boundary of the property, there is ' an existing upland cut ditch that runs parallel to the Pinellas Trail. The ditch carries overland flow from the existing site, as well as approximately 2.15-acres of offsite flows from the south. The ditch also receives discharge from an existing outfall control structure located behind the medical offices located at the corner of Ft. Harrison and Druid Road. The flows accumulated within this ditch ultimately outfall into the existing stormwater system that runs along the south side of Druid Road. K:Vasmine Way\Reports\Master Drainage Report.doc ' Project: Jasmine Way Townhomes By: - Chk'd By: _ Existing Conditions: Basin Characteristics Area (A) On-site = 2.63 Off-site = 0.00 t 2.63 acres Curve Number (CN) Land-Use Area HSG CN Residential - 38% Impervious 1.50 Uc 61 Residential - 38% Impervious 1.13 Ub 87 Total 2.63 72.2 CN Note: Uc = Urban Land - Astatula Complex (A) ; Ub = Urban Land (B/D) If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Impervious area calculated from existing survey information. Overall existing site is approx. 33% impervious. Use residential - 38% imp ervious Project site is approx. 57% Uc soils and approx. 43% Ub soils. Time of Concentration (Tc) 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t sub 1' 24.5 120 0.4 5.88 0.004 24.48 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s V t(sub2)2 ' 305 0.0047 1.11 4.60 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 145 2.0 1.2 30.3 30.3 minutes Note: 1. Eq. (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From eq. for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 ' Florida Design Consultants, Clearwater, Florida Printed: 17-Mar-04 File: exist-cond.xls Page: _ 1 ' Project: Jasmine Way Townhomes By: Chk'd By: Developed Conditions: Offsite Basin Characteristics Area (A) On-site = 0.00 Off-site = 2.15 2.15 acres ' Curve Number (CN) Land-Use Area HSG CN Open Space - Fair Condition 0.06 Uc 49 Open Space - Fair Condition 1.01 Ub 84 Impervious 1.07 - 98 Total 2.14 90.0 CN Note: Uc = Urban Land - Astatula Complex (A) ; Ub = Urban Land (B/D) If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. ' Assume offsite area is 50% impervious. Offsite area is approx. 6% Uc soils and approx. 94% Ub soils. Time of Concentration (Tc) e 25 year Zone 6 IDF cu rve Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t(sub 1) 43.0 320 0.4 4.47 0.0063 42.95 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s V t(sub2)2 ' 190 0.0053 1.17 2.70 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 0 2.0 0.0 45.6 1 45.6 minutes Note: 1. Eq. (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From eq. for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants Clearwater> Florida Printed: 18-Mar-04 File: offsite-cond.xls Page: Jasmine Way Townhomes Hydrology Report - Basin Summary 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event (9" rainfall) 3/23/04 Basin Name: Exist Group Name: BASE Simulation: Existing Node Name: Druid Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 4.04 Comp Time Inc (min): 4.04 t Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 9.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 30.30 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 2.630 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 72.200 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.25 Flow Max (cfs): 6.112 Runoff Volume (in): 5.602 Runoff Volume (ft3): 53486.387 Basin Name: Offsite Group Name: BASE Simulation: Existing Node Name: Pond Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 6.08 Comp Time Inc (min): 6.08 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 9.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Offsite Time of Conc (min): 45.60 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 2.150 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 90.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.46 Flow Max (cfs): 5.299 Runoff Volume (in): 7.781 Runoff Volume (ft3): 60729.157 I Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of I PROPOSED CONDITIONS Proposed Conditions: Summary: The proposed Jasmine Way Townhomes project consists of the construction of 45 three-story townhomes, divided into seven (7) separate buildings. The project will also include the construction of a pool area as well as drive aisles, additional parking spaces, sanitary sewer system, potable water system, irrigation system and the required treatment pond and stormwater system. The required stormwater treatment and attenuation will be provided in one (1) proposed pond. The pond is located in the northernmost portion of the property. Due to the limited area in this area of the property, the east and west sides of the pond will be vertical retaining walls (to be designed by others). An approved fencing will be provided along these sides of the pond. The north and south pond side slopes will have a 4:1 slope to allow for maintenance access. Pursuant to geotechnical information provided by Nodarse & Associates, Inc. (field work performed on ' 01/21/04), evidence of the groundwater table was located between three feet (3') and five feet (5') below the existing ground. Based on exploration and field observation at the site, Nodarse estimates the seasonal high groundwater level to be two feet (2') to three feet (3') below existing site grades. In the location of the proposed pond, the existing grades are approximately 34 feet. Therefore, the seasonal high groundwater is approximately 31 feet. Water quality is provided in the proposed pond for the first one-half inch (1/2") of runoff over the proposed project site (approximately 2.6-acres), as well as the first one-half inch (1/2") of runoff over the off-site basin to the south that discharges to the existing ditch (approximately 2.1-acres). In the proposed construction the existing ditch will be filled and the runoff will be routed through the proposed stormwater system. Pursuant to the Pre-Application Meeting held with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), there is no water quality compensation required for the existing ' ditch. The total water quality volume required and provided is 0.2 acre-feet. In addition to water quality volume pursuant to SWFWMD requirements, the proposed pond is also sized to provide attenuation per the site redevelopment requirements of the City of Clearwater. City of Clearwater rules indicate that attenuation must be provided for the additional runoff volume created. The volume is calculated using the Rational Method and the increased C-value over the proposed site. City of Clearwater redevelopment rules restrict the pre-development C-value to %i the actual value. The total attenuation volume is 0.40 acre-feet. r The proposed pond top of bank is 35.00 feet. The proposed bottom is 29.0 feet. Due to the required treatment volume, the proposed weir elevation is 31.20 feet. The total volume available in the pond is 0.62 acre-feet, which is greater than the combined treatment volume and attenuation volume. In order to construct the proposed pond bottom two feet (2') below the seasonal high groundwater elevation, the plans call for a lined pond. The liner will consist of pvc or clay or another approved equal. The liner will be placed at elevation 27.0 feet with two feet (2') of clean fill placed over top. 1 K:Vasmine Way\ReportsWaster Drainage Report.doc Water quality will be provided via filter drain. SWFWMD requires the treatment volume must be recovered within 36 hours. Pursuant to the City of Clearwater, the volume must be recovered within 24 hours. Per the more conservative rule, a Side-Drain Filter Drawdown Analysis was performed. A total of sixty linear feet of underdrain is required to draw down the treatment volume in 22.9 hours. An AdICPR model was created to determine the runoff flows and peak stages developed for this project. ' In the existing condition, the peak 25 year/24 hour flow created from the project site is 6.11 cfs. The peak 25 year/24 hour flow created by the off-site basin is 5.30 cfs. Therefore, the allowable discharge rate is 11.41 cfs. In the developed condition, both the project site and the offsite basin are routed through the proposed retention pond. Using a 7.0-inch weir length, the proposed peak 25 year/24 hour discharge rate is 10.60 cfs. ' The proposed pond discharges into the existing stormwater system that runs along the south side of Druid Road. :es K:\Jasmine Way\Reports\Master Drainage Report.doc Project: Jasmine Way Townhomes Developed Conditions: Basin Characteristics Area (A) On-site = 2.63 Off-site = 0.00 ' Curve Number (CN) Land-Use Area HSG CN Industrial - 72% impervious 1.50 Uc 81 Industrial - 72% impervious 1.13 Ub 93 ' Total 2.63 Note: 1 Uc = Urban Land - Astatula Complex (A) ; Ub = Urban Land (B/D) If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. ' Impervious area calculated from proposed site plan. Overall proposed site is approx. 71% impervious. Use industrial - 72% impervious Project site is approx. 57% Uc soils and approx. 43% Ub soils. Time of Concentration (Tc) Per the Storm Drain Tabulation Form Florida Design Consultants, Clearwater, Florida Printed: 23-Mar-04 File: dev-cond.xls By: Chk'd By: 2.63 acres 86.2 CN 35.6 minutes Page: Project: Jasmine Way Townhomes By: Chk'd By: Developed Conditions: Offsite Basin Characteristics Area (A) On-site = 0.00 Off-site = 2.15 2.15 acres Curve Number (CN) Land-Use Area HSG CN Open Space - Fair Condition 0.06 Uc 49 Open Space - Fair Condition 1.01 Ub 84 ' Impervious 1.07 - 98 Total 2.14 90.0 CN Note: Uc = Urban Land - Astatula Complex (A) ; Ub = Urban Land (B/D) If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. ' Assume offsite area is 50% impervious. Offsite area is approx. 6% Uc soils and approx. 94% Ub soils. Time of Concentration (Tc) 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t sub 1' 1 43.0 320 0.4 4.47 0.0063 42.95 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L S V t(sub2)2 ' 190 0.0053 1.17 2.70 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 0 2.0 0.0 45.6 45.6 minutes Note: 1. Eq. (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From eq. for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, Clearwater, Florida Printed: 18-Mar-04 File: offsite-cond.xls Page: 1 Project: Jasmine Way Townhomes By: Chk'd By: Developed Conditions: Attenuation Volume Attenuation Volume Required Pursuant to City of Clearwater requirements, when propo sing redevelopment of an ' existing site, attenuation must be provided for the increased volume. The volume is calculated using the Rational Method (Q = CiA). For the existing condition, the calcuated C-value is 50% of the actu al C-value. The intensity (i) is calculated at one (1) hour. Existing C-value Land Use Area C-value Pervious 1.74 0.20 Impervious 0.89 0.95 2.63 acres 0.45 Use 50% 0.23 C-value 1 Proposed C-value Land Use Area C-value ' Pervious 0.77 0.20 Impervious 1.86 0.95 ' 2.63 acres 0.73 C-value Difference = 0.73 - 0.23 = 0.50 C-value Intensity (i) Zone 6 25 Year Storm at 1.0 hour 3.65 in / hr Area (A) 2.63 acres Increased Volume Q x 1.0 hr=(C x i x A) x1.0 hr xIft/12 in 0.40 acre feet 17546 cubic feet Florida Design Consultants, Clearwater, Florida Printed: 16-Mar-04 File: atten-vol.xls Page: ' Project: Jasmine Way Townhomes By: Chk'd By: ' Developed Conditions: Treatment Volume Treatment Volume Required Pursuant to Southwest Florida Water Management (SWFWMD) Rules, the pond must be able to treat the first one-half (0.5") inch of runoff. Total Onsite Area = 2.63 acres (Ac) 2.63 acres x 0.50 in. x 1 ft. / 12 in. = 0.11 acre feet PLUS ' Total Offsite Area = 2.15 acres (Ac) 2.15 acres x 0.50 in. x 1 ft. / 12 in. = 0.09 acre feet ' Therefore, the total required treatment volume is 0.20 acre feet ' Florida Design Consultants, Clearwater, Florida Printed: 22-Mar-04 File: treat-vol.xls Page: Project: Jasmine Way Townhomes Developed Conditions: Pond Volumes Proposed Pond Stage ' ( _ TOB -3.00 Bott Stage Diff. (ft) (ft) TOB ' 3.00 -3.00 .00 3 Bott Area Area (sf) (ac) 5560.2 0.128 Elev. 35.00 4486.2 0.103 Elev. 32.00 3412.2 0.078 Elev. 29.00 Avg. Inc. Area Area Volume (sf) (sf) (cf) 5560.2 5023.2 15069.6 4486.2 3949.2 11847.6 3412.2 Treatment Volume Required ' Treatment Elevation 0.20 acre feet Stage Vol (ft) (af) 32.00 0.272 X 0.200 29.00 0.000 Florida Design Consultants, Clearwater, Florida Printed: 22-Mar-04 File: pond-vol.xls By: Chled By: Vol. Vol (cf) (af) 26917.2 0.618 11847.6 0.272 0.0 0.000 X = 31.2 feet Page: Jasmine Way Townhomes Input Report 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event (9" rainfall) 3/23/04 Basins ------------ Name: Dev Node: Pond Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 35.60 Area(ac): 2.630 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 86.20 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Developed conditions - Project Site Basin ------------------------ Name: Exist ------------ ------------------------------ Node: Druid ---------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph ' Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 30.30 Area(ac): 2.630 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 ' Curve Number: 72.20 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Existing discharge to Druid Road sto rmwater system ------------------------ Name: Offsite ------------ ------------------------------ Node. Pond ---------------------------------- Status: Offsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 ' Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 45.60 Area(ac): 2.150 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ' DCIA(%): 0.00 Offsite from south of project Nodes Name: Druid Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Ini t Stage(ft): 28.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 29.250 Type: Time/Stage Boundary Condition - Druid Road Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 28.000 12.00 29.250 24.00 28.500 ' Name: Pond Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Group: BASE Type: Stage/Area Proposed Pond 2 sides - vertical wall; 2 sides - 4:1 slopes --------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 29.000 Warn Stage(ft): 35.000 1 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Pagel of 3 Jasmine Way Townhomes Input Report 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event (9" rainfall) 3/23/04 ------Stage(ft) ------- --------- Area(ac) -------- 29.000 0.0780 1 35.000 0.1280 - Cross Sections Operating Tables -- ----------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------- -------------- Pipes Channels Drop Strcutures - - - - ---------- =__ ---------------------- ______===== -- - Name: DS1 From Node: Pond Length(ft): 26.00 Group: BASE To Node: Druid Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Average Conveyance ' Geometry: Circular Circular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Span(in): 15.00 15.00 Flow: Both Rise(in): 15.00 15.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Invert(ft): 28.200 28.000 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw ' Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Solution Incs: 10 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Outfall from proposed Pond into Existing Storm Manhole on Druid Road. *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure DS1 *** Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 7.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Invert(ft): 31.200 Control Elev(ft): 31.200 TABLE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weirs Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 3 Jasmine Way Townhomes Input Report 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event (9" rainfall) 3/23/04 Bridges ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Breaches ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rating Curves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hydrology Simulations Name: Existing Filename: K:\122\ProjData\DrnData\Existing.R32 Override Defaults: No Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 100.000 10.00 ==== Routing Simulations Name: Proposed Hydrology Sim: Existing Filename: K:\122\ProjData\DrnData\Proposed.132 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max De lta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 24.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Bounda ry Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) ------------ Print Inc(min) --- -------------- 100.000 6.000 Group ------------ Run --- ----- BASE Yes Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 3 ' Jasmine Way Townhomes Hydrology Report - Basin Summary 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event (9" rainfall) 3/23/04 Basin Name: Dev Group Name: BASE Simulation: Existing Node Name: Pond Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 4.75 Comp Time Inc (min): 4.75 ' Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 9.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 35.60 ' Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 2.630 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 86.200 DCIA (%): 0.000 ' Time Max (hrs): 12.34 Flow Max (cfs): 7.148 Runoff Volume (in): 7.323 Runoff Volume (ft3): 69913.226 Basin Name: Group Name: Simulation: Node Name: Basin Type: Unit Hydrograph: Peaking Fator: Spec Time Inc (min): Comp Time Inc (min): Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount (in): Storm Duration (hrs): Status: Time of Conc (min): Time Shift (hrs): Area (ac): Vol of Unit Hyd (in): Curve Number: DCIA ($): Time Max (hrs): Flow Max (cfs): Runoff Volume (in): Runoff Volume (ft3): Offsite BASE Existing Pond SCS Unit Hydrograph Uh256 256.0 6.08 6.08 Flmod 9.000 24.00 Offsite 45.60 0.00 2.150 1.000 90.000 0.000 12.46 5.299 7.781 60729.157 I Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Jasmine Way Townhomes Routing Report - Node Min / Max 25 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event (9" rainfall) 3/23/04 Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs Druid BASE Proposed 12.00 29.250 29.250 0.0017 0 12.56 15.619 0.00 0.000 Pond BASE Proposed 12.70 34.383 35.000 0.0050 5352 12.33 12.315 12.70 10.601 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page I of 1 M M M FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 1 STORM DRAIN TABULATION FORM Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: 3/2 312 0 0 4 REV: PROJECT: Jasmine Way Townhomes FDC PROJECT NO.: 699-203 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: JHB P!O' 312312004 RFV RY• _nA n BAR- DRAINAGE i z CONTROL ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES z RELS _ AREA (ACRES) V - z CROWN ELEV. z PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 10 YR LOCATION w w C= J z0 2 O FLO WLINE E LEV. w OF LL ww = C= F LL z a 3 c¢i z OJ O all a Initial HGL 10 Year/ 24 Hour UPPER END j j D LL ? C= O O O a N J LL J U. w¢^ z Fall W O Peak Elev 33.79 w O z m7 Lu Lu w ¢ O ¢Oin O O 2 ?i U, W 0 w " AT a OU Q. ¢in U. STATION DIST S U) v1 TO J AREA C rn t? cn ? ? ? ? O v LL O W w : (03a ro LL O U. n REMARKS 1 TOP 34.03 34.01 0.02 24 0.03% 1.24 3.90 k= 0.5 7 Hwall M 61 1.88 0.55 1.03 45.6 0.8 3.77 1.03 3.90 35.30 32.20 32.00 0.20 RCP 0.33% 4.48 14.07 portion of offsite basin 6 30.20 30.00 :#OE:: 0.012 50%impervious 1 GE 34.01 33.90 0.08 24 0.07%0 2.07 6.52 k= 0.5 6 Grate M 108 0.22 0.88 0.19 46.4 0.9 3.73 1.75 6.52 34.77 32.00 31.80 0.20 RCP 0.19% 3.37 10.57 onsite basin 5 777777 -30.00 29.80 D3: 0.012 : 90%impervious 1 GE 33.90 33.80 0.08 24 0.08% 2.26 7.10 k= 0.5 5 Grate M 70 0.2.0 0.88 0.18 47.3 0.5 3.69 1.92 7.10 34.77 31.80 31.60 0.20 RCP 0.29% 4.18 13.14 onsite basin 4 29.80 29.60 : Q04:: 0.012 ii 90% impervious 1 GE 33.80 33.80 0.00 24 0.00% 0.13 0.42 k= 0.5 4 Grate M 70 0.13 0.88 0.11 47.8 8.7 3.67 0.11 0.42 34.77 31.60 31.40 0.20 RCP 0.29% 4.18 13.14 onsite basin 3 2.9.60 29.40 0.012 90%impervious 1 GE 33.80 33.79 0.00 24 0.00% 0.52 1.64 k= 0.5 3 Grate M 43 0.24 0.88 0.21 56.5 1.4 3.34 0.49 1.64 34.77 31.40 31.20 0.20 RCP 0.47% 5.33 16.76 onsite basin 2 29.40 29.20 ::1%: 0.012 90% impervious 1 Rim 33.79 33.79 0.00 24 0.00% 0.51 1.62 k= 0.5 2 MH M 30 0.00 0.88 0.00 57.9 1.0 3.29 0.49 1.62 35.50 31.20 31.00 0.20 RCP 0.67% 6.39 20.06 onsite basin 1 29.20 29.00 : E1001 0.012 : 90% impervious GE 33.99 33.98 0.00 18 0.01% 0.54 0.95 k= 0.5 11 Grate 61 0.17 0.88 0.15 15.0 1.9 6.38 0.15 0.95 35.20 32.60 32.40 0.20 RCP 0.33% 3.70 6.53 onste basin 0 31.10 30.90 0.012 90% Impervious R GE 33.98 33.90 0.05 18 0.08% 1.79 3.16 k= 0.5 10 Grate - 1 68 0.42 0.88 0.37 16.9 0.6 6.08 0.52 3.16 36.13 32.40 32.20 0.20 RCP 0.29% 3.50 6.19 onsite basin 9 30.90 30.70 : Ef 02 0.012 90% Impervious 1 GE 33.90 33.90 0.00 18 0.00% 0.27 0.47 k= 0.5 9 Grate S 69 0.09 0.88 0.08 17.5 4.3 5.98 0.08 0.47 35.01 32.20 32.00 0.20 RCP 0.29% 3.48 6.14 onsite basin 8 30.70 30.50 ::{Cbi]:: 0.012 90%im ervious 1 GE 33.90 33.90 0.00 18 0.01% 0.51 0.91 k= 0.5 8 Grate S 68 0.10 0.88 0.09 21.8 2.2 5.44 0.17 0.91 34.89 32.00 31.80 0.20 RCP 0.29% 3.50 6.19 onsite basin 5 30.50 30.30 0.012 90% im ervious 1 GE 33.93 33.91 0.01 15 0.02% 0.77 0.95 k= 0.5 13 Grate S 57 0.2'7 0.55 0.15 15.0 1.2 6.38 0.15 0.95 34.50 32.70 32.50 0.20 RCP 0.35% 3.39 4.18 portion of offsite basin 12 31.45 31.25 7W -512 7777 50% impervious 1 Rim 33.91 33.90 0.01 18 0.01% 0.58 1.02 k= 0.5 12 MH S 120 0.33 0.50 0.17 16.2 3.5 6.18 0.17 1.02 34.90 32.50 32.25 0.25 RCP 0.21% 2.95 5.21 courtyard 8 31.00 30.75 0.012 40%impervious 1 Rim 33.93 33.90 0.02 18 0.03% 1.11 1.98 k= 0.5 14 MH S 64 0.23 0.69 0 15.0 1.0 6.38 0.31 1.96 34.90 32.45 32.25 0.20 RCP 0.31% 3.61 6.38 courtyard 8 30.95 30.75j ;:::0.()1.:::1 0.012 ::: :: 65% Impervious Page 1 of 1 I Jasmine Way Townhomes Hydrology Report - Basin Summary 10 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event (7" rainfall) 3/23/04 Basin Name: Dev Group Name: BASE Simulation: Existing Node Name: Pond Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 4.75 Comp Time Inc (min): 4.75 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 7.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Onsite Time of Conc (min): 35.60 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 2.630 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 86.200 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.34 Flow Max (cfs): 5.313 Runoff Volume (in): 5.385 Runoff Volume (ft3): 51406.220 Basin Name: Offsite Group Name: BASE Simulation: Existing Node Name: Pond Basin Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Fator: 256.0 Spec Time Inc (min): 6.08 Comp Time Inc (min): 6.08 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount (in): 7.000 Storm Duration (hrs): 24.00 Status: Offsite Time of Conc (min): 45.60 Time Shift (hrs): 0.00 Area (ac): 2.150 Vol of Unit Hyd (in): 1.000 Curve Number: 90.000 DCIA (%): 0.000 Time Max (hrs): 12.46 Flow Max (cfs): 4.008 Runoff Volume (in): 5.815 Runoff Volume (ft3): 45385.832 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page I of I Jasmine Way Townhomes Routing Report - Node Min / Max 10 Year / 24 Hour Storm Event (7" rainfall) 3/23/04 Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs Druid BASE Proposed 12.00 29.250 29.250 0.0017 0 12.54 12.796 0.00 0.000 Pond BASE Proposed 12.73 33.793 35.000 0.0050 5138 12.33 9.211 12.73 7.796 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Jasmine Way Townhomes SIDE-DRAIN FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS E h ^h V ^V Lmin Lmax Lavg HYD. AREA FLOW AVG. ^T ET NGVD TOTAL INCR. TOTAL INCR. GRAD. FILTER Q=KIA FLOW INCR. TOTAL 31.20 2.70 XXXXXXXX 8,373 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.3500 192.0 1404.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 915 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1,303.3 0.7 XXXXXXXX 30.98 2.48 XXXXXXXX 7,458 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.2400 178.8 1201.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 898 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1,108.0 0.8 XXXXXXXX 30.76 2.26 XXXXXXXX 6,560 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.1300 165.6 1014.2 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 1.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 881 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 928.4 0.9 XXXXXXXX 30.54 2.04 XXXXXXXX 5,679 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0200 152.4 842.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 863 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 764.5 1.1 XXXXXXXX 30.32 1.82 XXXXXXXX 4,816 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.9100 139.2 686.6 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 3.6 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 846 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 616.4 1.4 XXXXXXXX 30.10 1.60 XXXXXXXX 3,970 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.8000 126.0 546.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 5.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 829 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 484.1 1.7 XXXXXXXX 29.88 1.38 XXXXXXXX 3,141 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.6900 112.8 421.8 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 6.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 811 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 367.5 2.2 XXXXXXXX 29.66 1.16 XXXXXXXX 2,330 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.5800 99.6 313.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 8.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 794 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 266.6 3.0 XXXXXXXX 29.44 0.94 XXXXXXXX 1,536 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.4700 86.4 220.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 11.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 777 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 181.5 4.3 XXXXXXXX 29.22 0.72 XXXXXXXX 759 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.3600 73.2 142.8 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 16.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.22 XXXXXXXX 759 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 112.1 6.8 XXXXXXXX 29.00 0.50 XXXXXXXX 0 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.2500 60.0 81.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 22.9 31.20 DLW (TOP OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 29 NWL (BOTTOM OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 28.5 ELEVATION OF CENTERLINE OF PIPE 4200 AREA @ DLW (s.f.) 3412 AREA @ NWL(s.f.) 2 L min 2 L max 5.42 "K" 60 REQUIRED UNDERDRAIN LENGTH 22.9 TIME FOR SYSTEM TO DRAW DOWN (36 HOURS = 72 HOURS WITH SAFETY FACTOR OF TWO) City of Clearwater 24 hour volume recovery ATTACHMENTS LOCATION MAP I r1^ATIr1AI \AAM USGS MAP N 0 a N r W ' w w z z 0 W 0 of 0 LL ' O 0 N th M FIRC ., r 4i ""' ' ? it ? ' • . ? _ ,? ?.' Cit, +1?f1?? +< - ? 0. - ? ? e'"_'.. Ir 1' ? ?"', f•? ttt)Radio. owe'A jar +.•+ .• ,. ? 444 Project Site _ ' s .. "",1- i?x• ,?~ j ! _? a i y/ t ,` ?? ,per ?•T r r Ugh-t y . -''' , I? ?d ? 1. j n;''lr,.,-: 4 ? • _ I'?1E ?a `?I 1... ?'?r-' 1'.. ? ,i ;; rus IPA •f ? w.? blew t./ ?4 ' ?i, (7 .. i 1 111 •* «Y. 4 ' 4 e ; .t 39, Pita j 94 .'f!` +t ti•-+'?JS''[ r•w,? ?. ?1 'ti,:,. _G'. ?. - ? - , ?f y ??-?' •, -.._?{+..s:?I r / r' f ? r '?. fry f, "? t?1••---T`'?r ? 1. ? ., j ... - r rY ?' }; f r?. r1 f , GUS :Cm. v.- _ .. hem r•:f. ?r.f,?-?` !?'? *slr.y w w 1 ,,. ?- _ '' ...t i?J,?l +? ? r? e?.. 06, dis *pa a@ I, °.. '. °7 ,w r r ? r ? _ .•""''. ? ? ? rf r 4 {• ? Ci" 4' f.?r? - j • 'Y = },.: , , vvv NN%71W1111%G WWA% I USGS Map G1 S Data This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be considered comprehensive for site-specific data. A FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH r« _1 r f C' 6 1" = 300' JASMINE WAY Aerial Photograph GIS Data ' This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be considered comprehensive for site-specific data. N A FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS. ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS & PLANNERS SCS SOILS SURVEY DATA SOIL SURVEY OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BY EARL S. VANATTA, JR., LEON T. STEM, WILLIAM H. WITTSTRUCK, DAVID E. PETTRY, AND JAMES W. SPIETH, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE, IN COOPERATION WITH THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATIONS -nINELLAS COUNTY is in the west-central part of Florida (fig. 1). It has an area of about 280 square miles. It is bounded on the north by Pasco County, on the east by Hillsborough County and Tampa Bay, and ' on the west and south by the ulf of Mexico. Figure 1 shows distances from Clearwater, the county seat, to major cities in the State. The county was formed in 1911 from part of Hills- borough County. Although it is the second smallest county in Florida, it is one of the most densely populated. The population currently exceeds 500,000. Four towns have a population of less than 1,000, and two have more than 40,000. Because the trend in land use is toward further urban expansion, a section on town and country planning has been included in this survey. Pinellas County occupies a peninsula that ranges from 4 to 15 miles in width. The coastline is broken by many keys and offshore islands. Elevation ranges from sea level to 97 feet. The soils generally are sandy and excessively drained to very poorly drained. Many areas are affected by a high water table and ponding. In the northwestern part of the county is an area of rolling ridgeland, commonly called the Pinellas Ridge. This ridge is 3 or 4 miles wide and extends southward from Palm Harbor to the vicinity of Oakhurst. It is 25 to 97 feet above sea level and is pocked with sinkholes, many of which are filled with water. A native vegetation of turkey oak, pine, and grasses still grows in places, but most of this area has been planted to citrus or is used for community development. This is the major citrus pro- ducing area in the county. In the southern part of the county is a rounded area of flat uplands about 5 miles in diameter. Maximum elevation is about 50 feet. The city of St. Petersburg occupies nearly all of this upland area. The northeastern part of the county and a large area northeast of Pinellas Park consist of saw-palmetto and pine flatwoods that are dotted by small ponds and are out by swamp drainageways. Elevation in this area and on most offshore islands generally is less than 25 feet. The soils are generally sandy and are excessively drained to very poorly drained. Throughout Pinellas County are areas of Made. land built up by dredging and filling operations. Since 1959, when the total land area of the county was 168,960 acres, about 10,225 acres of Made land has been added. In 1969, the total land area of the county was 179,185 acres. The climate of Pinellas County is humid and sub- tropical. The average annual rainfall is about 55 inches, and the period of greatest rainfall is June through Sep- tember. The average temperature is about 63° F. in winter and 83° in summer. The economy of the county is based primarily on tour- ism, which employs about 52 percent of the work force. Manufacturing and construction employ 23 percent, and farming and related work only about 2 percent. For more information about Pinellas County, refer to the section "General Nature of the County" at the back of this survey. How This Survey Was Made Soil scientists made this survey to learn what kinds of soil are in Pinellas County, where they are located, and how they can be used. The soil scientists went into the county knowing they likely would find many soils they had already seen and perhaps some they had not. They observed the steepness, length, and shape of slopes, the th kinds of native plants or crops, and many facts about profile soils. They dug many holes to expose soil profiles. A F Figure I.-Location of Pinellas County in Florida. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 _i i..:.i;.C SON GROUPS FOR PI`dELL.%.S COU:T,' sl_?Is01. SOIL NAME P,• Pomello fine sand 1'P Pompan:? fine sand ..--Ps Pompan:, line sand, ponded Sp Spoil 5a (`<:clacha) StR St. Lucie fine sand, 0-5% slopes scC St. Lucie fine sand, 5-12% slopes Sci St. Lucie fine sand, shell substratum (Canaveral) *Tc Terra Ceia ruck, :moderately deep variant (Samsula) *'I'd Tidal Marsh (Mvakka) :.Cs Tidal Swamp (Estero) HYDROLOGIC GROUP C B/D D C A A C D D D Ub Urban Land B/D Uc Urban Land-:lscatula Complex A Uk Urban Land-Immokalee Complex B/D vm Urban r-and-`1val ka Complex B/D :.`D Urban Lzi:id- Pome 1 to Complex C Uw Urban Lanci-Wabasso Complex B/D Wa Wabass c fine sand B/D .'c Wauchu la fine sand B/D *HYDRIC SOIL MP UNITS - Hydric soils are those soils chat in their natural conditions are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor the growth and regeneration ,,f hydrophytic vegetation. 1 n t NUMBER 10 nsp l t x a P"K", S 3 _ Y us:, fl 4` Ut •: fNa ".?? - a E - .Maw` J - : q "W t-+_k+'uy?k r,.. - Co ?. R e z ?.. Ma C6 RW TER county sat) z? ? wale m 0 Co • ^ 1? n Ub: rat?. - a ? « lJb??,- r 'm t 'tK. r ice' U c x Ub a. y *} Ub Uc 1 QO ;z Z?, 40 0c ?O J u- r- It Z DO O.U 9 V) ?J (W u? z a. y (h 0) N H c 1 FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP Community Map History table located in the Flood Insurance Study report for this jurisdiction. To determine if flood insurance is available in this community, contact your insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at 1800) 638-6620. 14& APPROXIMATE SCALE 500 0 500 FEET NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 108 OF 327 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX BEU.ENK TOWN OF 125088 am G CLEARWAtER CrrY OF 128086 0108 G PINELIAS COUNTY MsCi9 0108 G I -NOTE- THIS MAP INCORPORATES APPROAMATE BOUNDARIES OF COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM tNirrS AND/OR OTHERYNSE PROTECTED AREAS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE ooasrAl h7ARRIER IMPRavEMEHr Aar OF ,980 (PL 101-M NSrke is User: The MAP NUMBER shown behaw Should be used mtwn pladrq map orders: the COMMUNITY NUMBER sham Show- should be used an irmum- wpOcafto for to wMed MAP NUMBER 12103CO10BG EFFEVVE DATE: SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 Federal Emergency Management Agency LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED BY 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE A No base flood elevations determined ZONE AE Base food elevations determined. ZONE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of pondirg); base flood elevations determined. ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan flooding, velocities also determined. ZONE A" To be protected from 100-year flood by Federal flood protection system under con-- struction; no base flood elevations deter- mined. ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); no base flood elevations determined. ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave action); base flood elevations determined. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100 year flood with average de of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 100-dear flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-year floodpiain. ZONE D Areas in which flood hazards are undeter- mined. UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS' Identified Identified Otherwise 1983 1990 or Later Protected Areas Identified 1991 or Later `Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to Special Flood J Hazard Areas. Floodplain Boundary Floodway Boundary - - Zone D Boundary Boundary Dividing Special Flood Hazard Zones, and Boundary Dividing Areas of Dif- ferent Coastal Base Flood Elevations Within Special Flood Hazard Zones. -513 Base Flood Elevation Line; Elevation in Feet" A A Cross Section Line 23 - - - - - 23 Transect Line 17 .1 .- F 7 MAGNOLIA I LOTUS PATH ?Z NE X I I ME ZONE X R WAND 'n PRNFR a WAY STREET w Fe-6-.'c NIL S'-e. ZONE ty Areas lI OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES R. ?F fIOR/DADESIGN CONSULiMIIS, lNC. Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 ' March 23, 2004 1 Mr. Greg Inglehart GWI Investments, Inc. ' 2510 Prospect Road Tampa, FL 33629 Re: Jasmine Way Townhomes Stormwater Management System Maintenance Dear Mr. Inglehart: As one of the requirements for obtaining a Surface Water Management Permit from the Southwest ' Florida Water Management District, we are asked to provide a copy of the Operation and Maintenance Instructions for the stormwater management system. Please note the attached items outline a suggested stormwater management facilities operation and maintenance regiment. ' It is our suggestion that quarterly visual inspections be made of the general system with an annual detailed inspection being conducted preferably in late spring or early summer prior to the advent of the ' rainy season. We will be providing the Southwest Florida Water Management District a copy of this letter and the noted attachments. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to call me Sincerely, ' Jeffrey W. Denny, P.E. Project Manager Attachments ' :c Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC, w/o attach. Scott Doster, GWI, w/attach. ' File 699-203-30.04 :cP K:liasmine Way\Letters\inglehart.doc 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST 1. VEGETATION: (Structures and Channels) a. Need for cutting and/or spraying b. Need for reseeding c. Need for fertilizing d. Evidence of grazing e. Evidence of motorbikes or other vehicles 2. FENCES: a. Loose or damaged posts b. Loose or broken wires c. Accumulated debris in fence d. Condition of gates 3. PRINCIPAL SPILLWAY: a. Obstructions in spillway b. Condition of outlet and inlet structure 1) Signs of seepage 2) Separation of joints 3) Cracks, breaks or deterioration of concrete 4) Differential settlement c. Sediment level in relation to crest inlet structure d. Scour at outlet e. Condition of trash f. Levees 1) Settlement 2) Any breaks 3) Erosion g. Condition of riprap 1) Undermining 2) Damage or deterioration 4. GATES OR VALVES: a. Damage or debris 5. RESERVOIR AREA: a. Undesirable vegetation growth b. Slash and other debris c. Berms 1) Erosion 2) Settlements d. Levees 1) Settlement 2) Any breaks e. Slope failure f. Surface drainage 1) Condition of open channels 2) Catch basin condition a) Manholes b) Outlets 6. DIVERSION STRUCTURES: a) Pipes, free-flowing, no obstructions b) Entrance and exit scour c) Settlement or breaks in diversion 7. FILL AREAS: a. Settlement or cracking b. Erosion C. Slope failure d. Wildlife damage 8. CHANNELS: a. Sedimentation b. Bank cutting c. Debris accumulation d. Condition of riprap or other works of improvements 1) Undermining 2) Damage or deterioration 3) Adjacent channel scouring e. Adjacent property damage 9. STRUCTURE DRAINAGE SYSTEM: a. Drainage outlet pipes 1) clean or dirty water 2) Pipes free-flowing, no obstructions 3) Evidence of seepage a) Adjacent to pipes b) Lower 1 /3 slope b. Rock toe drains 1) Free draining into collection channels or catch basins 2) Clean or dirty water 10.' SAFETY HAZARDS: The items to be checked at time of inspection may include above, but are not limited to those listed. 11. FILTER DRAIN SYSTEMS a. Flush system yearly (minimum) 1) Undo cleanout caps and flush 2) Filter material b. Observe system for inordinate amount of sand or normal accumulation of debris c. Backwash system if sluggish (i.e. if bleeddown takes longer than 36 hours or every 5 years minimum) d. Allocate monies for replacement of filter material every 15-20 years. KAJasmine Way\Letters\inglehart.doc GEOTECHNICAL REPORT I KAJasmine Way\Reports\Master Drainage Report.doc Feb-09-2004 12:26pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL 813-792-1352 T-432 P.001/009 F-128 G W I INVESTMENTS 813.792.0400#12 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SKEET TO: FROM: ' Ed Mazur Scott Doster COMPANY; DATE: FL. Design Consultants 2/9/2004 ' FAX NUMBER: TOTAL NO. OP PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 727.848.3648 9 PHONE NUMBER: SP-NDER'S REFERP.NCE NUMBER: R>?r?ERENCE NUMBER: Jasmine Way Towns Geotech Report YOUR URGENT ? FOR REVIEW Q PLEASA COMMENT ? PLEASE REPLY ? PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS: 134 ' Attached please find the pertinent portion of the georech report I will forward the complete report once I receive it I am expecting the boundary and tree survey this afternoon and win forward it accordin&. Also, I met with Tom Glen from waste management and he provided a ' preliminary approval on the 15' one ways, but said that he was going to recommend that we convert the design to include two dumpsters instead of the 90 gal individual containers. I am having DPLA look at the option and will forward information when it is available. Feb-09-2004 12:26pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL GWI Investments - Jasmine Gables Way N&AProjectNo. T03-G-245 Page 2 813-792-1352 T-432 P.002/009 F-128 8132585241 ta.2 GENERAL SUJISYJRFACE CONDMONS Subsurface soil conditions encountered in the SPT borings are shown on the Test Boring Records in the Appendix. Descriptions of the soils encountered in the borings are accompanied by the Unified Soil Classification symbol (SP, SC, etc.) based on visual examination. Stratification boundaries between soil types should be considered approximate as the actual transition between soil types may be gradual. The borings performed for this exploration encountered fine sands and clayey sands to depths ranging from 12 -to 22 feet below existing grades. Below these sandy soils, the borings encountered a sandy clay stratum that-was encountered to the boring termination depths of 25 feet. The relative density of the soils was very loose to medium dense with standard penetration resistance values (N-values) ranging between 3 and 19 blows per foot (bpt)• ' The groundwater level was observed in the SPT borings at depths of 3.0 to 5.0 feet below the existing grades. Groundwater Ievels will fluctuate with the amount ofrainfall and with site development and, therefore, may be different at other times. According to the Pinellas County Soil Survey, the soils at'the site belong to the Urban Land Series and due to artificial drainage and past earthwork activities, no estimates for seasonal high groundwater levels are provided. Based on the results of our exploration and our observations at the site, we estimate the seasonal high groundwater level to be approximately 2 to 3 feet below existing site grades. The existing ditch on the site certainly affects the groundwater levels on the site. . , PRELE I NARY RECOMIVI> "ATIONS The following preliminary recommendations are based on the project characteristics previously described, the data obtained in our field exploration and our experience with similar subsurface conditions and construction types. Once the project, and site plan, has been further developed, we should be contacted to perform a final level geotechnical exploration. General Site Preparation: The initial step in routine site preparation should be the complete removal of the existing buildings,.pavements, topsoil, and any surface organics andlor deleterious materials from beneath and to 5 feet beyond proposed structure and pavement areas. After this initial stripping process, the entire site should be inspected by a Geotechnical Engineer. At that time, the site should be proofro led using a large vibratory roller (Dynapac CA-25 or equivalent). The purposes of the proofrolling are to detect any areas where ' Feb-09-2004 12:26pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL GUI Investments Gables - 1 asmine Way N&A Project No. T03-G-245 Page 3 813-792-1352 T-432 P.003/009 F-128 8132585241 p.3 unsuitable soils are present as well as to densify the near-surface loose soils for support of shallow foundations. Materials wbicb yield excessively during the proofrolling should be undercut and replaced with well-compacted structural fill. The Geoterhnical Engineer, based on Iris observations, can recommend the nature and extent of any remedial work In-place density tests should be performed by an experienced geotechnical engineering technician working under the direction of a registered Geotechnical Engineer to verify the required degree of compaction. Foundation Design: Once the existing subgrade and/or new fill soils in the proposed structure area have been properly prepared, the proposed buildings can be constructed on a system of conventional shallow spread or strip footings bearing at minimum deptbs below the finished floor elevations. Footings which bear in densified ==sting soils or in new structural fill can most likely be designed based on a ma)dmum allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 pounds per square foot. Footing subgrade soils should be approved by the Geoteebnical Engineer prior to placement of concrete and steel. Fill Placement: Any additional fill placed during construction should be inorganic, non- plastic, granular soil (clean sands). The fill should be placed in level lifts not to exceed 12 inchrs loose thickness. In-place density tests should be performed on each lift by an experienced engineering technician working under the direction of a. registered Geotechnical Engineer to verify that the recommended degree of compaction has been achieved. CLOSURE N&A appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. xfyou should have any questions concerning the contents of this report, or if we may be of fiuther assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, NODARSE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joseph E. Prendergast, P.E. Senior Greotechnical Engineer Florida Registration No. 50774 Distribution: 3 - Addressee Appendix. Location Plan (Figure 1) Key to Symbols Test Boring Records 2- S- v-k rohF . Phillips, P.E. Tampa Branch Manager Florida Registration No. 47586 7EP":G:1G&OTSCID20=TO3.G,145 GoblalaunineWWvapwLwpd Feb-09-2004 12:27pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL 813-792-1352 T-432 P-004/009 F-128 GWI Investments 8132585241 p.4 Geatechaial, Eavirvamenal Geauchnses 6 llateriil Engiaevs Winta Fuk - OrmcfA Own • Tampa • Weit him huh DATE 2 ct-,!54 14FODARSE a 41 s s o e' S a T E :. er o. PROJECT No. -128:S - (r• 2 `fS SUBJECT _ _A N ,t' S -7;-4, >Lr•.. a W?t BY =-c I? PAGE c of ti D?t?4?A .ClcoAP. ; i v1 i ?.T6 2. I a! ! 1 ' • ? 1 T$?? i I l . •' ?: s T6.3 .. f. i .: IF k 4r 1. E:` r_t )•: ;:? •^•:r s? ;,: r.:. ?;' S_: NA-001G Feb-09-2004 12:27pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL GWI Investments Symbol Description Strata symbols poorly graded sand clayey sand ® Low plasticity clay 813-792-1352 T-432 P-005/009 F-128 8132585241 P.5 misc. Symbols Water table during driI ling Feb-09-2004 12:27pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL GWI Investments '? bE1E? ¦? 0 -ate 2 I? 17.5 w y w 1 DESCRIPTION Gray f= SAND (SP) Brawn flue SAND (SP) i; i? Brown clayey fte SAND (SC) Green sandy CLAX (CL) Boring wrruinawd "XARKS: Groundwater entouMCMd at 3 f=_ SE8 KEY SHEEP P= EXPLANATION OP SYMBOLS AND A21BREYIATION3 USED ABOVE 0 5 10 15 20 2S 30 35 813-792-1352 T-432 P.006/009 F-128 6132585241 P.6 • PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT 10 20 30 40 60 80 • OR! BORING NUMBER DATE DR.MLED PROJECT NUM'E3E+Et PROJECT PAGE 1 OF 1 TB-1 01/21/04 T03-G-245 Oables/jasmine Way 4. S 4 13 3 8 1 11 ? Feb-09-2004 12:27pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL GWI Investments DIEP M I)ESCR W TION (FT-) 0 4 17 I 22 i 25 Brown C,ne SAND (SP) s; i; Tan fine SAND (SP) S Brown clayey fiat SAND (SC) C13=11 sandy CLAY (CL) Boring terminated RRMA1i1G\`; Orowsdwamr enaeunwm4 At 5 Pert. S" ICEY SH= FOR WI..ANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBRBYIAMOHS USED ABOYIr. 813-792-1352 T-432 P.007/009 F-128 8132585241 p.7 • PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT 0 i 10 5 1 20 25 30 35 IU 2U 3U cW 6U BORING N0WEER TB -2 DATZ DRILLED 01/21/04 PILOJECT NUNIBM T03-0-245 PROJECT Gables/Jasmine Way PAGE 1 OF 1 5 7 9 12 8 19 Feb-09-2004 12:27pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL GWI Investments D 1'1; DESCREMON 0 5 L2 22 25 Gray fine SANA (SP) Bmwn fine SAND OF) Brawn clayey Giu SAND (SC) Or= sandy CLAY (CL) Borins tarmiAated REMAPM: Oroundwatcr cncountcrnd at 5 fcm 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 813-792-1352 T-432 P.008/009 F-128 813z5852?1 P.8 • PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT 1 0 2 0 3 0 40 6 0 80 • • I t • • B01UNG NUbWER TS-3 DATE DRMLED 01/21104 PROTECT NUMBER T03-G-245 PR03ECT Gables/JacminP Wiy 17 14 7 16 19 10 1 5 1 a I SEE KEY SHIELrr FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND ASSARVIATIONS USED ABOVE ' Feb-09-2004 12:27am From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL GW I Investments MPTE1 DESCRAMON (FTJ 0 1.5 :z 2. Gcuy Ono SAND With conk frgpn sA9$ (SP) Sro-a ftAc SAND (SP) Grata nady CLAY (CL) sorµls rc:rninaced RlbtARHS: Gconndwacrr onaounlared at 5 foot. SEE =Y SMT FOR EXPL ANAMON OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED ABOVE 0 5 10 is 20 25 30 35 813-792-1352 T-432 P.009/009 F-128 8132585241 P•9 M PENETRATION - BLOWS/FOOT 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 60 SO • • I , I • • BORING NUMBER TB-4 DATE DRMLED 01/21/04 PROJECT NUNDER T03-0-245 PROJECT Gables/Jasmine Way PAGE I OF 1 11 6 7 8 11 6 1 6 12 r LETTER REPORT OF INFILTRATION TEST RESULTS K:Uasmine Way\Reports\Master Drainage Report.doc Mar-09-2004 03:43pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL r. •• 4;2GPM NODARSE ASSOC TAMPA March 9, 2004 N&A projectNo. T03-Cr-245.1 l &. Scott Doster GWI Investments 9912 Montague Street Tampa, Florida 33626 L"It" a ort of Ynwtrariou Test Results a les zs?aine W a . C Dew Mr. Dostter: 813-792-1352 T-581 P.002/003 F-425 NO. Vi P.2 14O13 ARSE 6 a9$4CIA1•ES, =NC, GeotKWcol, RMraTi sntal Consulting & MoWu4 Epeineeftg Nodarse & Associates, Inc. (N&,A) is pleased to prmeat this letter report of our geotechnical exploration for the above-referenced project. This letter report presents results from additional services requested by you. The additional services consisted of one Double Ring 100 rometer (DRI) test located within the nort3reastesa portion of the property, as requested. The field testing location is shown oa the attacbod Site Sketcb. The Doable Wag Inftlimmeter (DM test procedure consisted Of iastalliag a 12-i32ch that er steel ring and a 24-inch diameter steel ring concentrically into the ground to the dadmcl test depth. Water was then added to -a desired head level iu both casings and held constant The amount of water added to the inner casing versus tune was then recorded. This procedure was repeated every 15 mkmtes for a total of 4 hours or until a stabilized infiltration raze was achieved. The DRI test was performed in 9=2a accorda= with ASTM D-3385-75 The DRI Lost was performed within the southeast portion of the site. The teat was performed at a depth of 1.5 feet below mds grade. After fo= bourn a stabilized infiltration rate of 5.5 inob es per hour was recorded. If you have any questions concerning our results, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, NODARSE & ASSOCIATES, WC. a Florence, E.I. Gooteehnical Engineer ]c?9IIA?eae:G:1G:?OTT09-G-'145_GnbtaslwtMlnsWaylDBl-Tast?RP?? 3? •oH o]ms C. Phillips, P.E. Senior Crcoteamical Eugia? Florida Res, No, 47586 .BUILD ON OUR EXPERIENCE JAGISI3 M14.OW01M BIAGI o TAWA ? WDI PAW BEACH 9 WMTER PAU 1 Mar-OP-2004 03:43pm From-GABLES EAST CONST/RESIDENTIAL 813-792-1352 T-581 P-003/003 F-425 WA. 9.2004 4:26PM MoDARSE ASSOC TAMPA No. 771 Pr3 Gtact4RIC4. 6n%irooeoepa116tautbpia $ Materul fnQlAoe+i _ o v ipttr Pal • Ormak Ind • UAtpa • Were h1p Baatl DATE iwOz a 9 9 DARSE N G. PROJECT No.'r - 1 BY :S:r- M% Fag, SUSJFC7r PACE _? of 1 4 r 1 1 i • 1 IY 1 1 77- r..l. I . I I I i P. • -- ' • 1 1 . ? ; ? 1 1 1 • 1 9 • 1 1 . 9. 1 1 1 1 I . .,. 1? I I 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 li 1 ? 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 j 1 • ' 1 1 1 1 .1 I j I ! 1 . ' 1 . ? I 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 • 1 ' . 1• . 1 1 e 1 1 I ....raw , • ••.T ... - - _. • 1 = 1 1 ' T?•.? _ • w-. ? w- •+ . ? w• . •. • _ / • . {,mow...-- _•.' • ; 1 ; 1 ( I 1 1 1 r , 1 i i ? I ? 1 FLD2004-03017 504 JASMINE WAY FLD2005-07062 143 ISLAND WAY APP2009-00006 2325 STAG RUN BLVD FLD2005-11106 143 ISLAND WAY JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES MITCHELL, GERALD TALAVERA AT ISLAND ESTATES FLD2009-11042 13755. FT. HARRISON AVE. TATARON 0 9 ST 701 In v 1 I o ro I a, v v I 1" 1 a 1106 I r _ W DRUID RD W DRUID RD a r?_-I r- f 1 I----1 810 DRUID RD 1 v? b '°0 j _ I ~ I I__-J ?- Offices L I I I 1 f j ? I- I I 1 ,---; I 1 I I r----' I I I JASMINE WAY I I a I I I ? ? ? I I -- 1 1 j_ I ? 1? ? 9QQ I O y n 0 z n LLL 1 ; --I -I ices { Qffices - 907 --? GNOLIA DR I v , s Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: E. Joyin, Inc., Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Case: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004- 00003 Pro Site: 504 Jasmine Way Si a er es): 2.59 acres 15/29/15/54450/033/0110, 15/29/15/54450/033/0100, PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0090, 15/29/15/54450/033/0010, 15/29/15/54450/033/0020 10 rt I_I I'Y I Atlas Page: I 295B 0 • -;-- PIN ST -J I ---- m X01 h ? ? to f ?o I - ?b I I Ib I So I __, ! t i i I F-) M 2- I i _ I o o-^o a I 1-706 _ ???ttt? I v I T a 1 t--i t__ t I I I 1 I 1 j-- W DRUID RD ' iv tt j v rf'., , r Itq 80 I 1 ? p 1; y' _ l-__ I _ - J r--i 810 b I___J yo-- v LMDR 1 l I ? r ? I a -- I I 17L I ; I j 1, la I L I I LtJ I ? - I --t ----? I I t I I--- v LA 906' MAGNOLIA DR f i N ? d -- --- 1000 ---I L -- j - I I I ? rt I 1 Lr g ?P I ' D _ I 1 1 g o ri n ?i = AU = On M 1111 r I _ y lo b I n 1 _rL ? I I I I rr--- I 1-' L--- ? I 1 1--_? r 1 I I i I r 1 I , 9jLr I 1 I ,_ I' I I r -- ---------I I ? I l 19? ^-t I I s I Zoning Map Owner. E. Joyln, Inc., Craig Murtha, and Robert Resnik Case: FLD2004-03017/PLT2004- 00003 Site: 504 Jasmine Way Property Size(Acres): 2.59 acres 15/29/15/54450/033/0110, 15/29/15/54450/033/0100, PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0090, 15/29/15/54450/033/0010, 15/29/15/54450/033/0020 Atlas Page: 2958 O C O A 0 D 0 G"ECEI M E® NIM 4 . Llli`} PLANN'i" " ^ T-7 .?RTMENT CITY OF CLLtAi.dl1ATi:R JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES j$_€lpplp MEARWATER, FLORIDA ?r AREBRIENML APARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPED BY ge 9 t GWI INVESTMENTS B? I I TAMPA, FLORIDA - 1 . S. F O R " N A R R I S O N A V E N U E RON- E_EVA`?ON 9 SIOE E_EVATIOA Building Type - 1 Elevations Jasmine Way Townhomes 18?0 EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. ?cT?)Z,dxlXxXxIXIXIX x x)?Ixgi GWI Investments 3731 3n.,puk UT. SRiIC 300 I luuslun,'I'X 77092-5216 04017 Ph.-17"1719.0395 1/16" = I'--0" www.[Uhirchilccmrc.cum Clearwater, Florida .9n:,Iir?rmn, trx. 11AAS-CAI.uDRAL1. SLe ,DRK March 19, 2004 COPrRIGIa 1) ?IX131:D1 ARCIIITECTURE. INC. ALL RIGIUS RESERVED 1 a? R.- 7 A_- -S"I 14 51DE ELEVATION I I I REAR E-E'?.A-O\ } r IP } p®®p??9 {}}4 `r+a?lli9 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Mr. Greg Iglehart Mr. Scott Doster Mr. Ed Armstrong 2510 West Prospect Road Tampa, Florida 33629 Q - ? C I T Y OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 June 21, 2004 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2004-03017/PLT2004-00003 - 504 Jasmine Way Gentlemen: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206D.6 of the Community Development Code. On June 15, 2004, the Community Development Board reviewed your Flexible Development application to (1) to permit 45 attached dwellings with a front setback 10 feet to building, and side setbacks as follows: 5.92 feet to building, three feet to paver driver aisle on the north side of the commercial property, 7.5 feet to building, four feet to the paver drive aisle on the south side of the property, 5.25 feet to building, and three feet to the north side of the office property, and rear setback of 5.5 feet to building, and a building height of 36.98 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G, (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 45 lots, and (3) a right-of-way vacation of a portion of Jasmine Way between South Fort Harrison Avenue and the Pinellas Trail for the site at 504 Jasmine Way. Based on the application and the Staff recommendation, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.B. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The proposal is in compliance with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria per Section 3- 1202.G. 4. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That no building permits be issued until recording of the final plat; 2. That no building permits be issued until vacation of the Jasmine Way right-of-way; 3. That no building permits be issued until it is demonstrated that the proposed stormwater drainage system adequately conveys offsite drainage; BRIAN J. AUNCsT, MAYOR-COMMISSIONFR HOYI' HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER BII.I.JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" t June 21, 2004 Iglehart, Doster, and Armstong - Page Two 4. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 6. That revised mitigation counts be submitted f6i all trees rated 3 and above and 4" DBH and above (which are required to be mitigated), show the canopies of all trees to be preserved on all plan sheets, and show a detail of the lintel system prior to building permit issuance; 7. That a revised landscape plan (to address tree height/caliper and wall-climbing vine review staff comments), be provided for consideration and approval by Staff, prior to building permit issuance; and 8. That all signage meet Code and be architecturally integrated into the design of the site and/or buildings. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by June 15, 2005). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the Community Development Board meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on June 29, 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727- 562-4836. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.clearwater-fl.co Sin, rely,. Lisa I . Fierce ; Assistant Planning Director S: (planning Departmen6C D BIFLEXIInactive or Finished Applications Uasmine Way 504 -Approved Development OrderJune 15, 2004.doc - ~ a~a~-off ~e _ ` _ ~7 , PARCELI LOTS 1, 2, 9,10, & 11 BLOCK 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, DRAINING INDEX PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~ e SHEET TITLE TOGETHER WITH Flan a 15 E 1 g a S ~ COVER SHEET PARCEL II LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8 BLOCK 28, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. 2A SITE PLAN .TOGETHER WITH PARCEL III 2B PRELIMINARY PLAT BEGIN AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 29 OF THE PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK, 3 HORIZONTAL CONTROL/PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA AND THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF GRANTOR (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE 4 UTILITY PLAN RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY) AND GO IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 32 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ACROSS PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS THE SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER . OF BLOCK 33 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION, ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF•WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 28 OF SAID PLAT OF UTILITY DETAILS MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION, ACROSS SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 29 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (THE ABOVE IS A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY EL-1 BUILDING TYPE 1 OVER AND ACROSS JASMINE WAY). EL-2a BUILDING TYPE 2 (front ~ rear) TOGETHER WITH ~ ~ P EL-ab BUILDING TYPE 2 fiends) CURLE RUAD v~i ~ a THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 32 AND 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS a W R roP~ RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY O " eD D~ EL=3 BUILDING TYPE 3 • DESCRIBED A FOLL W : B ~ aR Sea S 0 S EGINNING OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 33, RUNNING THENCE ALONG V ~ ~ ~ SR SS' EL••4 BUILDING TYPE 4 • THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JASMINE WAY (VACATED PER O.R. BOOK 957, PAGE 192) ON AN ASSUMED `ti ~ A ~ ° \ W J ~ _ BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEG. 52 04 EAST, 61.24 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, SAID BLOCK 32; THENCE L EL-5 SOUTH 00 DEG. 0011 WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1,135 FEET TO THE ..,~utHWEST CORNER OF SAID 3 5 BUILDING TYPE 5 - LOT 1 • THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 52' "WET 61.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ~ Np1N sTREEr sR seo ~ 03 S , LOT 9; THENCE NORTH 00 LI-- ~ LANDSCAPE PLAN DEG. 01'08" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAME,135 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. aRys ~ ~ ` a CAJ ENTERP RDA o TOGETHER WITH CLEARWATER ~ ~ N ° LG-1 LAYOUT PLAN HARBOUR UNION STREET w g THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF THE ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 28 AND 29, ~ ~ W' ~ TREE SURVEY 8~ MITIGATION MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, suNS T POINT Rana LD-1 DETAILS FLORIDA. Z x CR 59 LD-2 DETAILS LESS THE WESTERLY 7.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 135.12 FEET OF THE VACATED FORMERLY THE A ~ `"P~ ( TLANTIC COAST LINE c~ GAP _ RAILROAD) RIGHT OF WAY. O ~q F'~O,p DREW STREE ~ IP-1 IRRIGATION AININ 2.201 sF~, CLEVELA CAMPB~-L CONT G 9 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PROJECT cauRTriE~ CAMPBELL CAUSEWAY 7~p~EY IP-2 IRRIGATION SLEEVING PLAN ` J' _ GULF i(1 BAY BLVD SR 60 LOCATION 0 IP-;~,. IRRIGATION DETAILS JASMINE WAY RMI (TO BE VACATED) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF JASMINE WAY EWING AVENUE RIGHT-0F'~~N'~,Y ( ) , ACCORDING TO BELLEA R RpAD I1LD TAMP 4lR 1 - MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUi3LIC RECORCS i.9F PINELLAS COUNTY, q I1LD TAMPA BAY FLORIDA, LYING WITHIN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING ~oQ ~ . LAND USE DATA ~ MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: J ti 0~ J o EXISTING PROPOSED CRITERIA (MIN/MAX) BEGIN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5 BLOCK 28 MAGNOLIA PARK AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3 P ~ wesr , , AGE 43 BAY DR EAST BAY R R LAND I~SE PLAN CATEGORY CBD CBD _ OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S88°50'05"E, ALONG. THE NORTH RIGHT-0F•WAY tie ~~sF LINE OF JASMINE WAY (EWING AVENUE), ACCORDING TO SAID MAGNOLIA PART( (BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS ~2q r FOR THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION), SAME BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK 28, SAID MAGNOLIA PARK, FOR 279.70 Z~%Nlf DISTRICT C / 0 (1) FLEX. DEV. LEVEL II - FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 8, SAID BLOCK 28, SAME BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF--WAY LINE OF THE ATLANTIC COAST RAILROAD, ACCORDING TO SAID MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE ~ U"~'~ APARTMENTS / TOWNHOMES N/A S02°31'02"W, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF--WAY LINE OF THE ATLANTIC COAST RAILROAD, FOR 60.02 FEET TO THE EFFICIENCIES POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID JASMINE WAY (EWING AVENUE), SAME LOT AREA 112,638 SF 2) N A BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 33, SAID MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ATLANTIC COAST RAILROAD, N88°50'05"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE OF - 2.59 ACRES ~2) / - JASMINE WAY (EWING AVENUE), SAME BEING THE NORTH LINE OF BLOCK 33, SAID MAGNOLIA PARK FOR 278.00 LOT WIDTH (3) 276.35' (W} 276.35' (W) N/A , FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, SAID BLOCK 33, SAME BEING THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH FT. HARRISON AVENUE, ACCORDING TO SAID MAGNOLIA PARK; LOT DEPTH VARIES VARIES THENCE N00°53'39"E, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE OF SOUTH FT. HARRISON AVENUE, FOR 60.00 FEET TO 340.56' - 347.92' 340.56' - 347.92' N/A THE POINT OF BEGINNING. IMPERVIOUS (4) 31% (6) 71% 0=75% (MAX) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ SURFACE ,'I r ( ) CONTAINING 16,732 SQUARE FEET OR 0.384 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. , ~ ~ ` i C=95% MAX p - I~ ~ ~ ~ „ d~d07 ' ~ ~ ?oo~P UNITS 25 UNITS 45 UNITS N/A /~Gf Zc ERR ~ ~ DID- OR OFCLOSURE: 0.0033 FEET (LOS) ~ b a3 rr /~c-r' I- DENSITY 11.33 UNITS /ACRE (6} 17.4 UNITS /ACRE (7) N/A ~S~ TT~P~ l~~D l~r~T~ ~ G - ~ DISTANCE TO 1 ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MORE STRINGENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AS F BUILDING PAVEMENT BUILDING PAVEMENT N/A OUND IN THE STANDARD. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER OR THE CONTRACT DOCUMEfJTS AS PREPARED BY FLORIDA DESIGN NORTH 3' 60' 5'-3" 3' .,...~a~.__.. CONSULTANTS, INC. SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS PROJECT. Z ._a SOUTH 2' 32' S'-11" 3' FnST 69' N/A 5'-6" - 2 THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. WEST 12' N/A 10' - 3 THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. ARE APPROXIMATE AS SH WN 0 ON THE PLANS AND IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION IN THEIR VICINITY. HEIGHT 36'-113/x" p~ TWO-STORY THREE-STORY 1 ~ ~ N/A IS PREPARED-FOR: 4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO PREVENT EROSION AND TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT MATERIAL TO INLETS, PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS 36,767 SF (5) ~ N/A SURFACE DRAINS, LAKES AND WETLAND AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE STRAW BALES,' SILT BARRIERS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE 0.84 ACRES (5) y MEASURES TO MITIGATE ADVERSE IMPACTS TO EXISTING SURFACE WATER QUALITY. N (32.4%) C r~ 5 THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTROL ALL FUGITIVE DUST ORIGINATING ON THE PROJECT BY WATERING OR OTHER METHODS AS REQUIRED. F'~4RKING LOT INTERIOR LANDSCAPING - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS N/A E % OF PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA a 6 NO DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE EXISTING SANITARY AND STORM SYSTEMS. PARKING - GARAGE = 90 N/A 7 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES MUST BE INSTALLED BY THE CITY. 0 o ' N iv~TES ADDITIONAL = 11 TOTAL = 101 (2.2/UNIT) • 8 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION WILL BE DONE VIA INDIVIDUAL UNIT PICK UP IN ACCORDANCE WI1-H THE SCHEDULE OF THE CITY OF CLEAR WATER SANITATION DEPARTMENT. - ~~-5241 (1) IN EXISTING CONDITIONS, THE PROJECT SITE IS PARTIALLY ZONED OFFICE (0)(1.345 AC), PARTIALLY ZONED COMMERCIAL (C)(0.857 AC), AND CONTAINS 0.384 AC OF RIGHT-OF-WAY IN JASMINE WAY. ~ 9 SITE LANDSCAPING WIL r L BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 42.27 OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. SEE 3 LAND SCAPE PLAN) (2) IN PROPOSED CONDITIONS, (0) = 75,366 SF, 1.73 ACRES INCLUDES 0.384 AC JASMINE WAY ~+ir: IN PROPOSED CONDITIONS, (C) = 37,272 SF, 0.86 ACRES RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED ;s~`' U N ®(2A) THE MAXIMUM DENSITY ALLOWED, OVER THE ENTIRE PROJECT ,Jpffrf~YW,' 2~N ~ " 10 THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN FLOOD ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN, PER FLOOD INSURANCE =1.73 AC (15} + 0.86 AC (24) , , o-, ytl',°;. a RATE MAP NUMBER 12103C0108G, COMMUNITY NUMBER 1250960108E EFFECTIVE. DATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. =46.59 = 46 UNITS ~ ~ , ' PREPARED BY: ° 11 SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE DIRECTED DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN COMPLIANC (3) LOT WIDTH DETERMINED BY LOT BOUNDARY ABUTTING FT. HARRISON. ~r~ ~ p~pg , ~u , 4 ~ _ W 0 - ~ E WITH CITY OF a CLEARWATER CODE REQUIREMENTS. A w ~w ~ ~ . w . o - _ _ _ - _ _ (4) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS IN EXISTING CONDITIONS CALCULATED FROM P01 ARTS SURVEY ~ Lr FL-P.E._5 4~5 8 LTRREEEE O BE SPRINKLED. NTS INCs IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS IN PROPOSED CONDITIONS CALCULATED FROM SITE PLAN: ? I 94 .t (5) PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS INCLUDE EXTERIOR DRIVEWAYS AT EACH UNIT. D PLUHIVA 1JbZ51UN GUNSULTANTS, (6) EXCLUDES THE 0.384 AC OF JASMINE WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA. ON PLANS SHOW S N FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS , ENVIRONMENTALISTS ~ ~ I AT LEAST SURVEYORS 15 FEET FROM >•-IE PROPOSED BUI LDI NGS, AND WITHIN 40 FEET RANT. `7, hr t`T~'; & PLANNERS Y 3030 Starke Blvd. New Port Starkey Riche , Fl. 34655 °655 (7) INCLUDES THE 0.384 AC OF JASMINE WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED. Tel: 727 - AL PERMIT APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OFCONSTRUCTION PLAN SUBMITTAL 849 7588 Fax. 727 848-3648 . > 4 8 ® 6/01/04 ADDED DATA & NOTE PER CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUEST Date 03/15/04 1Q 5/10/04 REVISED PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS NO, 699'20;3 W,V. ~ µ;V, 3351 324 J0,39 NI RIM ELEV. = 33.83 +3369 +3219 +30,92 'q L ~ --~~„3~" 33~~, gg ~ 4146 SIR N 3~J.•~2 32fi7 J0.73 I~,,,_~ c• FlR 5/8' lB 3889 Og 33,737 32.14 3D.71 8~ N 0.02' STORM INLET E 1.09' ° , TOP ELEV. 34.61 N INV.=31.71 ~ ® J4a14 34.28 30.83 S INV: 31.65 Q • P•P• JI.~ 2 P. _ ~ ~ N 6 58.63 sIR 1 31 1°•t n 35.5 ++34.1 + +34.3 + 1 I nl 342 342 +34.134.1 +3263 DRAINAGE CONTROL I I I INV. 31.48 3276 I I I 33.2 ~I TOP ELE: 34.15 I I I I I Z I 3100 SLOT ELEV.=33. II I I w 8 +32.2 NE INV: 3210 ~ I ~ I I I 1111w ll I I • 1 al LnI IIw• ~ ~ I I I win. ~i I I I~ I Q 7.0 I I zlr I ~ 317 + I ¢ m +34.4 33.s I- II I ? ~ I ~ 9J w W I °I ' N w i I I ~ I ~ ~ I I o ~ r. II9 I I o~ I~ 0 o ~ F- I I + O 0 15 30 60 +3a.3s ~ I I I 33.s w + ° 36.35 ~j- I Z 34.1 f~ + 11 F- I ] 34.5 2 W f~ 35.1 I ~2.7II I ~ 1 0 1 51 +34.0 2 +33.0 +38.60 t +324 3 I I 5.3 ~ I 10 g I Q v} + + v~'i ° III ~ 344 36.09 + I i ~ ~ + w + III I 35,62 ~ z 3 .9 III F it 1s III I z RIM ELEV. =36.37 1342 3M•41 I ~ ~ + +34,5 MAGNOLIA PARK 1 TWO STORY 131.5 +~•2 + Q 3 34.4 TWO STO MASONRY P • 34'4 337 ~ 1 MA 0 IA PARK 35.99 36,28 10" + WOOD FR~A I I I } ~ 3& L P. t I P.B. 3, PG. 43 0 I ? ? ~ o P.. 3 PG. ~0= ° > » FINISHED FLOOR • . a: ~ 43 34 , a° 3&08 ~ III I Q ° S 8 50 05 _ + I wo PP 36.81 ~ ~ N 01 09 55 E 0 3s~z ELEV. - 35.47 + 32B~ 329 +3.3 I I 1 ~ ~ PP, J6.22 ~ fence tie 35.67 .51.54.29 J I SIR ~ 5 + o» ° I III o - 26.9 0.8' off 5 choin lin 341 I w Q + I ; . 6 +3sae _ k fen a 21" " • I + 70 _ ~ • 15 1 " ~ ~ 33.9 324 ~ . SIR 3 +36.29 ~ 31.0 FCM 4"x4" J5.99 n 50'(P) 3~•4 34.3F34.3 + I + N 0.01' PP fence tie 20° ~ ~ I. 33.5 I +34.4 N W 0.47' 0.4 on 34.5 a tie • I ° ~ r~ ~ 5 3.8' N 0 E T R 1 i. ' o~ I S 88 50 05 E +3s.1t FCM 4x4, I 35. . ~ ence tie 135.00 fen e tie MASONRY JBh off 36.55 6 V 36.30 135'(P) 78.16 O.BC off 3589 F NISHED 3+~ 6° II I I +34.1 + +33.8 _ _ 3.3' _ _ _ . , FLOOR II I I 33.s +34.s ~ 9" +36.1 2-9' + + 9 ®5" E 0 " i I I _ +323 ~ ~ Y / 15" 34.39 11 II I - I 13.5' ~ ®s" MASONRY ; f 'woo fe • e 11° I I I I `t nC 31.12 • J3.92 I " I I 35.8 } oo INISHED FLOOR ~ 3181 + ONE STORY ® 7 I I w + ~ ~ ~ ~ + ELEV. - 4" Jss s"1 MASONRY + +33s a~ I z~ O Z 35.7 • ~ n• ~ a FINISHED FL00 33.8 +33.3 0 . 2 6 30.6 34.5 Jw ° I ~ • • . ~ c°n w II 4 : x•12 ELEV. = 37.45 71» I ~o 89 35.99 u"i 20.9' Z Q ~ ~ g" 38.J3 ~ + + 1 I ~ z ~ _ w + 34.9 +34.2 325 1 ~ I ~ J6.38 3G35 O J 0» 35, q I I N a O z w ® 1a 10" BENCHMARK 7 8 I I a m 3443 OQ 06 X~ w +35.5 ood I WATER ELEV. = 30.15 w., 356 SET NAIL eck a"1o"1a" + - Ol 0 33.6 s4 15" IN ASPHALT I 9•~ + . I " 3~5 ELEV. = 35.38 I I + 34.1 5" t'S5'!Pl a + p 8" 5" 6" I I 130.6 33.9 34.0 +33.4 33,9 LEGEND ' I 3s.e 3s.e® ® ® ® ~ _ 6 5" ~ n w 1 I 2 4 J453 T.V.M. Q =UNDERGROUND CABLE TELEVISION MARKER R 35.56 35;42 O• w 32.6 I I I r, 23 ~ 3 34.99 ~ I LV,B , =CABLE TELEVISKON U1)UTY BOX =UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE PAINT MARK ~ 1t.6' :M ° II M ~z° h2 I I I P.P, p( = PoWER POLE iU&~---T - ~'r'~-0.= APPROXIMATE LOCATON OF UNDERGROUND O.H.L. =OVERHEAD LINES TELEPHONE CAME W1TH TELEPHONE URUTT' BOX o ~ 34.09 w N Q II I Q C•P =COMBINATION POLE (POWER/PNONE/CABLE T.V.) Ty, ~ _ ~~p ~p ENS PHONE CABLE WARNING MARKER - I,. 35.10 35.19 34.53 ~ W 3 m ~ I I I I ~ 50 ~ ' • ~ TWO STORY ~•ol z ~ I N LP. 3&OB 38.02 . , ~ 5 +35•,7 31 - w 1 I L.P. X = LIGHT PoLE E0.1L4 =UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC LiNE WARNING MARKER ° ~ MASONRY 32o I I I I FINISHED F o. ~ I W I C.L.P. X = COLIBINAliON rk LIGHT P01E F'H'~' UNDERGROUND flBER OPTIC LINE PANi MARK G.P. = CUY POLE - .I~V`~-W-'-'~-' APPROKiMAIE LOCA110N OF UNDERGROUND WATER LOOR 'a : ~•y ~ +J3.0 +32.4 - I I I z ELEV. = 36.00 1 x. c l ? 1 I M.P. ,r = METER POLE LINE WITH flRE HYDRANT, WATER VALVE tt METER 57 .13 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 41 +320 ° I I I N., O ~ 13,99 SE CORNER O N Z ~ • * X., v t SW CORNER :F =WATER LINE PAINT MARK F-- =GUY WiRE ---~YtN--RWL--@19--= APPROXIMAiE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND REUSE WATER P.P. r n ~ 34,87 34.71 ,14 M BLOCK 28 0322 ~3D 9'6 30.6 + O U 1 55' 12" ~ + 10" ~ J4.2 34.2 + BLOCK 29 = ELECTPoC UTILITY BOX (TRANSFORMER) WL LIN!» REUSE WATER VALVE !f METER - . e - - - _ ~ 3.3 ~0» 135'(P) _ _ ~ _ - S0'(P " 50~ p +33.6 3 .2 6 I I ~ O •6 + +34.8 SIR ~ : EH 35. CLP » ® - - 44J'(P) 1 I I ~ 34.9 ~fl' =UNDERGROUND POWER PAINT MARK ~ =REUSE WATER LINE PAINT MARK ~ = ELECTPoCAL OUTLET B' CHAIN LINK fENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED FPP ~ + 2 9.70 10 , l9 t - Seri a ie N N 0 • • . • , I V 50 0 ~'I P.P. 0. ~ on EAS RLY L O . + 1" SI I I O SIR • =PARKING POST OR BOLLARD = ELECTTIC UTILITY BOX ®=PROPANE TANK E Oa" . T•5. . • . 35,28 • . a ::3i@5 .6862 ~r~ 34. C.L. J432 u• + 69 ® I I w,v . • • • s7 x+.49 ~ ~ R W ','AGATE O =ELECTRIC METER CONC. e: ••e =CONCRETE ® ~ RIM ELEV =35.23 2 I I z / RIM ELEV. =35.40 ~ ~ } ~ ~ O.R.57, PG 192 4. ® ~ ~ I I I I = DECORATIVE LiGHT ASPH _ =ASPHALT -{---F---E =APPROXIMATE COCAiTON UNDERGROUND POWER LINES F,D.O.i = FLO/bDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA110N W INV. = 3205 34.99 3 ~ y 11 ~ I - w I 34.77 J 3533_+ 35,72 72 ~ 35.21 318 W INV. V 32.41 ~ ~ dl ~ ® = MONITOPoNG WE1L SJLQ =STATE ROAD DEPARiMENT 6"CLAY +»35242 ~ ~ 8°CLAY ~ ~ m 0 + NE INV,-= 32.42 .3265 o I I > ~ ~ ® = Ui1LITY MANHOLE O.R. = OFFlCIAL RECORD BOOK P.LS. =PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ® = PEDESTPoAN CROS5INC SIGN Lg# = LICENSED BUSINESS NUMBER ~ A 0 SENN9. 33242 + +3109 3247 T• » Z» 1~i" I I I ~ N I 34,51 n Sta 20 28 w T.S. =TRAFFIC Si~NAL UTILITY BOX 0/A =OVERALL DIMENSION I .91 ~ 34.27 ~ 33,42 ® 0i I I ~ + W.V. . Leo 34.88 3431 •w°' ~3,~g ® ~ ~ 34.7 i.S,P.~ =1RAFFlC SIGNAL POLE P.0.0. = PO1NT OF COMMENCEMENT S1ORM CURB INL TS P.0.& = POINi OF BEGINNING W.V. ~ - - ~ ~`'Y~-• _ 3J.82 ~ 33.29 3119 ~ 321 ' 321+30. 7 + r°n O ~ + 4.1 . p • • J293 » 30.~ I 'W ~ 1 I 34.1 344 +34.7 ~ i1•" = ` •.'35x8 35D9, •35.16• ~ ' 3~B~'~ 34.874 . ! : 3111 33'05 3281 ~ I I O 35.. ® ® ® ® • G.: Do4 8» 8' 5" 9" _ ~ ~.u1; =''34.69 .56 • J!. • : 34.34.. 327: :~a • ' • ~ +33.1 32. I I I I c.v. ® s° R/W VACATED P.P. ® 08" ® jdu:npSt~r © ~ FlP 1. 1p I (n C~~ ITE~D SECTi ~ _ ~~OFNWAY 43- - - - _±350 ~~_9 ~ ~ 9 N 0.93' J INV=29.94 O.R, 957, PG. 192 I IR~Ign 35.0+ 135'(P) oo ~ - 7" 5" W 0.31' S1 I ® ELEV = ELEVATION = FLARED END SECTION flR o =FOUND IRON ROD 7° ~ ~7 » SIR I WESTERLY '35, • . '?~I xi 12 fie1»e- . 7" 6 choin • • 5o'(P) 2 - ~ 50'(P) + - (L) ~ ° > » ~ ~ link fence ; 41 P.P. 3 D =GRATE INLET flP o=FOUND IRON PIPE ' S 8 8 0 0 I. • /•~.t ' I . ' 34.6+ ~ ir) TOP ELEV: 329243'~p} I N 189' 2'04"E (L 61.24' O 5 E , E INV: 30.J1 5t 35.fl 1s" + I I BENCHMAR = STORU SEWER P1PE It MANHOLE SIR o = SL71/2' IRDN ROD ?t CAP L.B X8113 S~ ~ S~C.O.~ - ~5~5 =SANITARY SEWER PIPE, MANHOLE, CLEANOUT A VALVE N~Do= $~NN ILOAND BRASS DISK 1B~Bi13 W +35.3 s° ~ + 278.00 p• 32.1 I K NW CORNER 34. 49 34.3 + 0.6. ® 393 „ : ; ~ + 34.0 I 1 I SET X-CUT BLOCK 32 34.0 TWO STORY ~ •3 + NE CORNER I L.P, ~ • n. MASONRY :::.31? E S 5" 33• LOT 9 g^ I 1 IN INLET =SANITARY LiNE RC'P =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE fNltDo =FOUND NAIL AND DISI( \ PAINT MARK ttiMP.= CORRUGATED METAL A'PE (p) = BEAAING/bISTANCE PER PLAT MASONRY 332 324+ ~ I ELEV. = 32.92 r- N 6" FINISHED FLOOR ® 1 ° FISHED FL00 zti41 1s° I I I ~ P.V.0.=POLY VINYL CH[OPoDE D,IP. = DUCTILE 1RON PIPE (L) = BEARING/U~STANCE PER DEED DESCRlPTIOM ELEV. = 36.00 3221 I I ~ O 00: E.- 0 "I O 35.46 34:p X33:5 1 Z I + V.0.P.= VITRiFlED CLAY PIPE (F) = BEAPoNG/DISTANCE PER FlE[D MEASUREMENT 5" ~ f•"`•.•T,•• I w 34,3 • + I 1 t ~ ~ + - ~ - G - ~ --0 =APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND (C) = 6EARiNC/DISTANCE PER CALCULATION G.V. U,G.L, GAS LINE WI1H GAS VALVE, CAS METER +35.10 i6° 33.9 I.:;,..: 9"10• g°I I I w ~ + O 33.5 I 0 I • I !n r+ 34.4 +4 i2" wood steps - ~ - I I I c 34s w GL ~ GAS LINE WARNING SIGN TYPCAL SPoT ELEVATIONS ~ =BURIED GAS LINE PAINT MARK TOP OF CURB ELEV. ~ ~ (IF SHOWN) W 3..1 3.2 t5» a I•' • 6°10" o° 11 I 33.6w (j 3 O r o I 40.4' F • ui I w T.S.: = TRAFFC S1GN FLOWLINE OF CURB ELEV. gg~~ 5g EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEV.96.18 ~ 135' P M gravel I I I w a 3 Z 3478 35.33 31:88 04 I I I C7 0 1 \o = MAILBOX EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEV. 96.~8.~ GROUND ELEV. 95.2 0 COR =CORNER i0P OF CURB fLEV, gg•68 GROUND ELEV. 95.2. .N 35.J0 t-••--'.-•Fr .t:_':~35.0 34.7• I~ ~ .`r..•:' 10" + I I I a1` o ~ ~o ~ :a 350 • :35:1••. • + +34.5 • , . 7 0 311 I I I ? ~ b I ti ~ I..~ ,'I 34.6 L :;I +32.8 III I Q~ ° am STY =STORY EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEV. 96.19 N I I~•;•.._•: ~ 34.3 I°. ~ I I I m a ~ ; ~ + 1145° .I 19. ° w., JD = JURISWCTIONAL CLF =CHAIN LINK FENCE y ° ~ TWO STORY +3 ® I;•, , + ~ I I ~ I al. 4.5 a 33.5 0 ~ I I m0 ~ L, MASONRY P.~' ~4.4:.,f•:;:~.'~ :I ~ ~ I I 1 2 IE = INVERT ELEVA110N = i0B OF BANK a W/1' = WOOD FENCE = i0E OF SLOPE CENTER LINE OF D1TCN O ~I.• ~ :.35'r-' FINISHED FLOOR 2 sl ~~34.87 --~•91t ~ o I I BLDG = BUILDING / ~ MAS =MASONRY Q = SCHEDULE B-21TEM C I ' I"I" ' `grdve~'''.~. _ ood ste s 4a z ° I . • ELEV. - 36.00 p+ + I I I I ° ! . 34.1 34. 10 9 ~o Z I ° MAGNOL AR I...ti••. •l 34.7 3z I I I I a°'I ~ S/W =SIDEWALK 3 • ~:'::::fil~': ~`:'';,:1 ~ 0 +ONE STORY ~ ~0 10" 7" I I I " ~ P.B. 3 G. 3 CONC =CONCRETE PB = PLAT BOOK ~ aM, :L6.3 89. MASONRY ~ + ~o ugh ' f • .n I FINISHED FLOOR ~4.a ~•7 + a " I ~ DB =DEED BDOK ~ ~ t PG =PAGE =BLOCK NUMBER (TYP) ,gp .4 ~ - 35.0 o I ~x~ I 14" 12" ELEV. = 36.38 35.52 33.3 wa®i5` ®$"I I .~6 135 (P) »34. „ ----71 3~ I I I ~ 34.1 (TYP) = TYPICAL 3 SHW =SEASONAL HIGH WATER ~ • 0° " + 34.8 ~ 14.83 I 358 34. x,60 00 FIR 5 8 + ~ ~ I 4.G I I I + 34.84 35x5 1 a" I W LEf~ 3 89 ~ i I I + 135.s GOV =GOVERNMENT ~ FKA = FORNEPo.Y KNOWN AS 0 BUILDING 0.1' S9 35.5 34.8 ~ 8" I 33.6 352 _ 7327 10 Off PROPERTY 1 TWO STORY ca~Xport 29. ~ ^ 18+ ~ ~ I 0 +33.4 3d I I F/f =FENCE iTE ® ® =ZONING v uNE WOOD -FRAME ~ 034.6 I " t E/P = EDGE OF PAVEMENT ° a P•P 34. FINISHED FLOOR O ~ ~'6+ ~ ~ 9 1 I I I •60 ONE STORY = ~ •7~ ~ ® + 332 I I s J ELEV. 3..00 SHED + I w = fXfSJING WAifRMAIN ~ L .C.O. ® MASONRY +35.41 ~ ~ 3 34.4 +33.5 334 I I I I F 3 ~ 50'(P) 12" I I INISHED FLOOR 41 5o'(P} 42.s'(P) ~ ~ ~ ~ = EXiSHNC SANITARY SEWER ~ ELEV. = 35.50 ' , - - - - _ _ ' " I sL15' (L} s as•52'o3"w 8 8 48 5 7 W .34.95 + • 20" . + _ 34.,3 NOTES: N I , O , 12 34.78 FCfld 4x4 FIR 5 8 R 5 8 6 chain , „ 31.02 I I 60.46 1. EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT (O.R. 8177, PG 71) TO"BE VACATED ~ 134.95 143.5 I " ILLEGIBLE 1 x;55:•• z 3 89 link, fence N 9 01 38 W " . 0.9 on 0 fyl 88 38 21 W 2. EXISTING JASMINE WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED ~ 35.4, III 31. I +35.31 +7541 +35.26 , I o c 3487 35.31 334.87 ,BJ• 3<i.13 I I +35.8 309 35.1 TREE LEGEND I 35.08 I 34.96.: MAGNOLIA PARK I I I +35.6 +352 1= 12' 12' oAK TREE N 35:11 I 1 I e I P.B. 3, PG. 43 1 I , I 1Y iz' WILLOW TREE a 12' Q ~ 12' MULBERRY TREE ~ N I III 3 I 24 12' 0 = 12' PALM TREE ~ y v w 14.92 I I I I ~ ~ .9I l i l ,1 , ~ 12" e • 12' BAY TREE ~ . 12" Q . 12' MAGNOLIA TREE ~ 4 ti I t: w 6 ~ I I ' 12' O. 12' CITRUS 1REE v 12" 0' ~ 12' EUCALYPTUS TREE N a I +35.46 ~ ~ +35,45 ? I I cNV ~ +35,20 8 I 33.91 GI' ~ ~ 12' 12' SYCAMORE TREE i I v +35.64 ® ~ +34,82 I I 31. I' A` 1Y ~ ~ iZ' PINE TREE 3 ~ ~ } 30.7 35.1 o° , 35.4 30.3 ;~F, 12" 12' CEDAR v " ~ 12" Q = 12' ELM 1REE ~ N 12` ~ . 12' MAPLE TREE T I ~ 12" Q + 12' WAX MYRTLE ~ ~ t2" }2' OTHER SPEgES - O ~ ~ +35.38 +35.30 +35D 11?. t ~ t2" d ~ 1 I +34:89 +355 rn I ~L.~~~ 4 12° p . 2' o v X 1 w +36.0 I f ~I ~ _G'j EXISTING BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATED 12, o a 1, ~ t,l ~ o 2-12-04 PROVIDED DY POLARIS ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ I +35.15 +34.98 +34,86 m +35,20 ' c 1 1 1 , , C .1 ~''A~ ~ m DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY l~- ~~(yyy CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE PREPARED FOR: SHEET DESCRIPTION: . o 3CRIPTION: o JOB' 0 JWD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED o DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FLORIDA DESIGN CONSUL TANTS, INC o JMS AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ` GWI INVESTM 6E 9 th . AUT ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS INVESTMENTS, INC. P CHECKED HORIZED TO COMMENCE. , SURVEYORS & PLANNERS 2510 PROSPECT ROAD JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES P X^ ° 3030 Starkey Blvd. New Port Richey FL 34655 .B. 8 PG. J O SHT. LLL N N Tel: (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 TAMPA, Florida 33629 O.C. TEL (813) 258-5240 FAX (813 258-5241 EXISTING CONDITIONS S 2 Y EM E.B. No. 7421 © 5/10/04 ADDED EXISTING TREES PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENT DATE. ~ NO. DATE REVISIONS APP'D 03!15104 V C) BY OF . ~ (~o R w EXISTING PROPOSED CRITERIA (MIN/MAX) LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY CBD CBD - 20 9 , 276.50,:;..,:. 2s~--"; ~7,, ZONING DISTRICT C / 0 (1) FLEX. DEV. LEVEL II - ~ U.: ~ ~ . ~ { USE APARTMENTS / TOWNHOMES N/A p ~ \ \ \ ~ ~ c ° \ ` ° EFFICIENCIES m~\ ~ ~ ~ v ~ 0 _ 0 10 20 40 LOT AREA 112,638 SF 2 N q ~ \ ° 2.59 ACRES 2 +n SIGHT TRI NGLE ` . ` \ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ° \ ~ \ ~ \ SIGHT IANGLE E LOT WIDTH (3) 276.35 (W) 276.35 (W) N A ~ ~ - ~ , ~ / ° \ \ . \ I ~ \ c :~c: ~ \ : \ \ e 1 2 FF=37.78 ~ 3 4 LOT DEPTH VARIES VARIES N/q \ \ ~ ~ -1 (ST P SIGN;) 340. 6' - 47.9 ' 340.56' - 347. 2' FF=37.28 ` ~ ~ ' ` ` 5 3 2 9 ~ ~ ~ 7 O ° ` \ ~ ~ END WALL ° \ ` ' ~ ` ~ ~ 7 8 ~ •Q ? LEGEND IMPERVIOUS ~ ~ ~ ° S R ACE % I °2i3~R ` ` < ~ \ , ~ ~ _ \ ® ~y ~ y ~ ~ _ ~ END WALL s \ .,s,, \ UNITS 25 UNITS 45 UNITS N/A ~ ® ~ - 0) - o ~ ~ ~ ` } , .1 y =Proposed Paver Block DENSITY 11.33 UNITS ACRE 6 17.4 UNITS ACRE 7 N/A d- ~ ~ ~ - ~s t' _ w , , DISTANCE TO , . ` \ ~ N/A 3 ` ` ~ . ~ BUILDING PAVEMENT BUILDING PAVEMENT \ ~ ~ r r r n r ~ \ \ \ ~ ~ NORTH 3 60 5 -3 3 N I ~ \ \ ` t _ ~ ~ ~ ~ =Pro osed Sidewalk SOUTH 2' 32' 5'-11" 3' ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ j 1 , " rte- P ` 3' EAST 69 N A 5 -6 - ~ \ ` ~ r ~ ' ~ 5~ TAE _ ~ . ' ~ ~ a r ~ WEST 12 N/A 10 - } , - ~ \ ~ ~ ! _ ~ S ~ R5-1 (DO NOT ENTER) HEIGHT 36 11 /4 N A o0 ~ ~ s' ~ ' ` w~ - ~ 1 / TWO-STORY THREE-STORY d- - M 1 v~~~.~ t ti 4 =Proposed Drainage Easement PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS 36,767 SF (5) N/A ~ \ ~ ~ry~ 0.84 ACRES 5 Z - ` ~ ~ (32.4%) ~ \ ~ \ \ \ ° 45 44 2B R W - ~ ' A T A - NA 41 P RKING LO INTERIOR LANDSC PING SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS / ~ ~ ti:, k \ ' , 12 OF PAVED VEHICULAR USE AREA ti`\ . ~ 2 13 14 ~ ~ G ~ =Existing Drainage Easement O FF N A ` ` ~ ` ~ FF=37.03 O PA I G - / FF=37.16 ° ~ : ; b RK N GARAGE 90 (8) a ~ \ ~ ADDITIO AL - 11 \ TOTAL = 101 2.2 UNIT ~ - - ® ` ~ l ~ ~ ( / ) p\ ~ \ - ~ a =Existing ROW To Be Vacated N 00 59 05 E ; , ~ , ~ NOTES 27.1 ® • ~~®~:s~~p~~®~®~t~q®®'~4~4mgd®r~ y ~ N 01 °09'55"E ® ® ~ Q ~ \ ~ \ ` \ \ 26.96' COMMERCIAL O O ~ 1 IN EXISTING CONDITIONS, THE PROJECT SITE IS PARTIALLY ZONED OFFICE 0 AND PARTIALLY ZONED COMMERCIAL (C) ` ~ ~ , ;;q a ~ ~ . \ . \ \ ~ ` OFFICE ti:: \ \ (2) IN EXISTING CONDITIONS, (0) 75,366 SF, 1.73 ACRES IN EXISTING \ \ \ ~ ~ 0 CONDITIONS C = 37 272 SF 0.86 ACRES \ ~ ~ \ GEO-MAT MATERIAL 3 LOT WIDTH DETERMINED BY LOT BOUNDARY ABUTTING FT. HARRI50N. \ ~ ~ O ~0, 16 t~ ~ y ~ \f,:6 4 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS IN EXISTING CONDITIONS CALCULATED FROM ; \ ` O . . ~ ~ y v ~ POLARIS SURVEY. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS IN PROPOSED CONDITIONS ~ ~ ` ` ; ` \ . CALCULATED FROM SITE PLAN. ~ -'p~~~. ~ ~ \ ~ ' 5 PAVED VEHICULAR AREAS INCLUDE EXTERIOR DRIVEWAYS AT EACH UNIT. ` ~ ` ~ ~ ~ NOTE; ` ~ ~ \ \ ` in \ \ rn NORTHERN MOST ROADWAY IS 1 (ONE) WAY WEST ONLY. ^ 6 EXCLUDES THE 0.384 AC OF JASMINE WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY AREA. ` ~ O ` \ t ~ \ ~ 17 r7 - ~ ` ~ \ \ FF=37.03 u~ ~ 7 INCLUDES THE 0.384 AC OF JASMINE WAY RIGHT OF WAY TO BE VACATED. ~ k: ; : - ' O ~ ~a I :m: ~ ~ ~ • : ~ I ~ ~fATEBLINE EASEMENT NO CO ~ ~ ` (8) ALL UNITS HAVE 2 CAR GARAGE. " : \ ~ ~ \ ~ \ ` ~ ~ W PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A TEN (10) FOOT WATER MAIN v EASEMENT LYING FIVE (5) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF WATER `q. ` ~ 00 _ , 18 6' u) MAINS UP TO AND INCLUDING ALL HYDRANTS AND METERS, 1 V ~ O EXCEPT WHERE SUCH MAINS AND RELATED WATER FACILITIES NOTES: ~ ~ ` ~ ~ - O \ ` ~ ` ° MAY LIE UNDER STRUCTURES. Q S LI W STE COLLECTfON WILL BE DON V A I I IDU U P U IN ~ > ` O D A E I ND V AL NIT ICK P o0 ~ ~ DASHED UN \ \ ~ ` ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER SANITATION ~ ~ D P T T z REPRESENTS ROOF \ \ ~ E AR MEN OVERHANG ( ) ~ y ~ \ ; 36 , 35 8 3 NOTE; FOR ALL SIDEWALK AND Q , 37 9 40 SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE DIRECTED DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM ADJACENT ~ , \ ~ PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ROUTES v RESIDENTIAL AREAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER CODE I FF=36.58 ;ti \ ~ \ ~ FF=37.03 ® (4' SIDEWALK SHOWN IN PAVERS), ' REQUIREMENTS. ~ ' 22 21 20 SEE SHEET LG-1. 19 ALL UTILIT{ES FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE TO BE BURIED. - ~ , \ ~ ~8. y o ( N \ ~ \ ~ ( - ) E ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ GEO-MAT MATERIAL L v `1: ` " ~ 4 } ~ \ \ - ~ R6-1 (ONE WAY) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ } .1~ ~ } ~ , ~.~(-~:5-.~~_ ~ tit ~ ~ ti{ ,p. i;.~~~ ~ ~,.t ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ , ..,r .r ~ JUN ~ 1 r~04 ~~4~ n , .S~_' ~ . ;f ~ 1 1r t } l7 ' 1 ' 1 ~'(J 1 t~°'~ ~ f' W I~ ~ t 4.~~( ~ '~`~1 ~ t l ~ti~~. ~ ~t.. ~ "O.; ~ r~ .~:At z w Q ~ ~ ~~.I AL ~ ~ ~ G~.~ ~ ~ ~ .n~. ~ ' ,~`2, - ~ - ~ ~ 4N ~ ~ . cam- , ~ „ ~ . r- _ ~ 1~~ ~ . , ~ r ~ oa --r 0 o ~ ~ ~ / l n%s i, ~ ~ - - ~ 4`r- - r_._,_ _ _ ~ 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ TT ~t _ _._s-' N J - 7 ~ 34 33 32 e 31 30 LIMITS OF EX1511NG DITCH ~ r' o 29 ~ ~ POOL 2 27 c FF=37.70 N 26 25 24 23 ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ° FF=36.49 00 FF=36.58 FF=36.49 ~ M a PROPOSED I W ~ " N_ N DRY DETENTION AREA ~p ° C 5~_ (SEE SHEET 5 FOR DETAILS) ~ u7 ~ Z 6 E - ~~~f1' o N s a1 °09'o7"w ~ - ` 134.91 ° ~ M O~ S 00 52 55 w 60.20 .~IYlift 3 a 0 V/ i 4 ~~f ~ ~ y ~ !i N PEDESTRIAN CONNECTfON v _ ~t ff W. Denny TO PINELLAS TRAIL 0 0 28 W 270.31, a ~ ; ~ o'~,. ~U z~a. ~00~ I a NOTE: FOR U11LITIES SEE SHEENS 3 AND 4 N 3 AND 4 ~ . ~~~.5~~25~~'~`~ N N rn C O i SHE SIGNATUflE OF THE QUALITY sor r,r,~~°.,~r` ~1 ~N 1f~ 1 1 titlHN11!~ a p V awncv CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE rrtF-rHrtw rvrc: SHEET DESCRIPTION: :RIPTION: JOB No. ° v ° FWD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED "cp DAAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FLORIDA DESIGN CONSUL TANTS, INC. 699-203 0 EPN Li CMS AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS GWI INVESTMENTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS P CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. 2510 PROSPECT ROAD JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES 122 0 F.B. S PG. 2A O 0 OC 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 TAMPA, (727) 849-7588 Fax: (727) 848-3648 , Florida 33629 SHT, N N O.C. cli TEL (813) 258-5240 FAX (813) 258-5241 A 6/01/04 ADDED LABEL PER CITY OF CLEARWATER REQUEST SITE PLAN r 1n 5/10/04 REVISED PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS oarE: EM E.B. No. 7421 6 NO. DATE REVISIONS APP'D 03115104 OF U BY Q i OUTH FT. HARRISON S LEGEND Z .r' ~ » N 00 53 39 E . - 276.15' - - =Project Boundary 0 10 20 40 ~ . . ~ t . . Hs,L'R!S Fl~,.~ , .y r . ~ . . N '53'39" E 121. 8' ~ r w ~ ; r ~ " , ~ \ r ~ \ N 00'53 39 E 120.90 \ =Existing Lot Line SCALE: 1" = 20' ' 23.00' v ; r rr ' r ~ ~ vv , , , 29.07 23.00 23.00 2 1 ~ r , r, ti l 2~: 23.00 23.00 23.00 28.70 \ , ~ \ . \ = Proposed lot Line \ \ ` \ r ~ <Gn`r v~ ` ~ =Existing Lot Number v r v~ ` . ` ~ \ \ f~ to fA ~ ~`r ~ Ul N V) 0 00 0 ~ tl0 ~ 'd:.,. ~ e\ ODv ~v ~ 07 OD O) 0 = Proposed Lot Number LINE TABLE 1 LINE BEARING LENGTH to (n O N N O 0 t0 (n t0 ` ' ~ ~ c0 ~ (11 ~D ~ \ ~ ~ 0O O ~O ~ ~0 2 3 ~o ~o `gyp, ~ , :~o . ~o .~o 1 \ r o ~o 5 L2 N44'06'21"W 7.07' o o o o\ d. ~ 'o 0 7 rn rn _ ,m Q 8 Q a 6 p Q QN Q Q o ; 10 L5 N45'53'39"E 7.07' m m m ` , m ` r m \ m m m m ~ 33 =Existing Block Number ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ o (n v, `v ~ ' ~ ~ ~ v v Ui \ ` ` ` ~ ~'t ~ e ~ s ~e~~~,~e~~~a~~a~e~a~~~~~~~,~~e~ 00 ~ ~ 4 m 00 29.35' 23.00' 23.00' 23,00' 23.21' \ ` `r \23.21' 23.00' 23.00' 23,00' 28.44' ~n a ~ a =Existing R/W To Be Vacated ry -P N' 00 3'39" 1 r4 r `~r. ~ ` ` ` ~ `r , " , e ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ 'u ~ r7 3 Oo E 12.56 ~ ~ ,4 ~ , . N 00 53 39 E 120.65 - r ~v~rraza~e~raq'~c~s~~s~aa~~u~e+®'a~rar~~m~r~t~'~ v N ,v ~ r ~ N \ rr ;l ; ` 5 2 ~ r ~ ~rr `r e MAGNOLIA PARK , r N 0 53'3 "'E 117 9 ' yt` r ~ ` ` ~ ;~'ti N 00'53'39° E '.92.42' W 9 . , 0 ~ ~ ~ t : rr r , , , ~ (n PARK =Proposed Common Area (Tract A) r , r r, r ~ , P.B. 3 PG. 43 43 25.69 23.00 23.00 \ \ ~ d , W 23.00 23.21 \ ~ , \ 23.21 23.00 23,00 23.21 O P v ; . v W ' \ \ r \ \ ` ~ r \ \ = Proposed Drainage Easement I of to Vl \ \ r\ ~ ` ,ti ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ do \ r.. Iq Ul Oo W t0 I 100 100 100 ~ \ \r OD\ ~ 00 0) O ~ OOi ' . t0 f0 p c0 p c0 O t0 p \ O p ` , ~ \ ti cD \ ~p ~ ~ p O O N rn rn rn 4 rn . Q o o ~ p• 14 O O ~O r ~.O ~ Qi 12 0I N Q 13 ti .11 Q . O O~ O N O j O j ~ N`~.\ ~ ~r Q; ~ O j O j s, m 6 5 s a \ ~ ~ \ ` r _ \ 7 : m m m m v v m, r r, ~ r~ r v~ m`v m m ~ '•o' DD: ~ =Existing Drainage Easement \r ~X rt N Q0 53'39" E r Ip ° D \ \r `U~ 1r 9,00':. ~ vv vv ~ ~~r v `v 7.7 ' 32.21' ~ GT ~ TOTAL PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 25.94' 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.21 ~ \ ~ \ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 23.21 23.00 10.21 N 00'53 39 E ~ ~ N 04' 339 E' 118.14' , ~ ~ N, 00'5339° E 56:42 t L2 N OOi PARCELI 27.18 r ,m D, ~ k 15 W - N 0109 55 E LOTS 1, 2, 9, f0, 811 BLOCK 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF A5 RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. rt- A r ~ V. , ~ - r `r. ~ O O `r `.r0 CO ~ `v r ~ O ~ m ~ ~ 26;96 w~ ~ r ~ ~~1 \ . TOGETHER WITH PARCEL II EXISTING LOT ~ < `.5 ~ Z,, \ E N a T A r 't•~ \ ry non ~ ~ ~ 7 N 00'53'39" E 45.00' TRAC NUM6ER (TYP) ' ~ ' ~ ~ z` D ` WATERLINE EASEMENT NOTE: LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 8 BLOCK 26, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. (COMMO ~ r d~:< r `E ~ PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A TEN (10) FOOT WATER MAIN I ~ 6 EASEMENT LYING FlVE (5) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF WATER TOGETHER WITH 6 EXISTING BLOCK r ~ ' ~ ~ \ , , ,vr o ~ ~ No 11 MAINS UP TO AND INCLUDING ALL HYDRANTS AND METERS, j ~ EXCEPT WHERE SUCH MAINS AND RELATED WATER FACfLITIES PARCEL III R TYP ~ ` ~v ` MAGNOLIA PARK NuMeE ( ) vt , ~ a, ~ ~ r` ~ ~ ~ " 14.19 N MAY LIE UNDER STRUCTURES. BEGIN AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 29 OF THE PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST RIGHT-0F•WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF GRANTOR (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAl') AND GO IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE, TO THE EXISTING LOT ~ r' , r . ~ , NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 32 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ACROSS THE SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, TO THE ~3~ r r N 005339..E h. , " 00 , ' LINE (TYP) ' r \ ` ~ \ ~ 11.00' N 00 ~3 39 E N c0 ~ \ ~ \ . \ , r t ~ 20.16' w NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 33 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION, ' ~l r.~ ~s y 17 0 , ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 28 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION, ACROSS SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF ~ \ r r ~ L p 07 ' WAY, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 29 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (THE ABOVE IS A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY OVER AND ACROSS JASMINE WAY). ' N 00'53 39 _F. 48.05 TOGETHER WRH N 00.'53'39" E ; 135.91' ~ ` ` 'r ~ oo m 00 \ y ~ ~ r ~ \ W THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 32 AND 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY 2.04 ~ r o ~ 1~ O - ~ ~ 25.70 23.00 18.00 23.00 23.21 ~ ` ; , - - ~ 1 0 ` r ~ ` N 00'3'39" E 56.42''. ° ~ O DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 33, RUNNING THENCE ALONG ` 10 10 THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JASMINE WAY (VACATED PER O.R. BOOK 957, PAGE 192) ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEG. 52'04" EAST, 61.24 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, SAID BLOCK 32; ~ ~ .r r` r\ 23.21' 23.00' 10.21' " ~ s , r \ ~ \ ~ N 00 53 f9 E THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG. 00'11" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID L071,135 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER \ 7.79 35.15 IRI OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 52'03" WEST, 61.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG. 01'08" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAME,135 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. N Ul fn U) N ',lnr rr ` ~`~.r (1, Vt (P UO ~O QN UO N UI ~ t r TOGETHER WITH O) N p Ql p Of p 01 p 0~ O W ~4 r r Z Z Q ~ 36 ~ ~ 3~ ~ o ~ o o~, fir, ~ ~ , ~ p ° 37 Q ° 39 40 ~ ~ ~ soo'S3 39 w THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF THE ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 28 AND O ON ON ON ON ~ ~ O ` r r r ~ ~ t0O t0O ~ ?6;$8' N • ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ 29, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, m a ~ ` ~ ` ~ ~P N .p N O m m m m o ( ~ ~ rr r .,r r ~ `r ~ s : 2 ~ ~ 0 _ FLORIDA. 22 1 2 1.~ 0 ~ r . m LESS THE WESTERLY 7.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 135.12 FEET OF THE VACATED (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE '~~r v ~ v ` ~ . A ~ RAILROAD) RIGHT OF WAY. , CONTAINING 2.2019 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 8 ~ N 00.5 ' s" ` TRACT A 3 3 E 135,99 ~ ~ ` ~ ~ N 00'53'39" E 97.42' c 0 25.78' 23.00' 8 0 ' 23 2 ' ` r r rr ~ . 1 . 0 23.00 23.00 • 1 ; ~ ; ~ 23.21' 23,00 23.00 28.21 (COMMON AREA) ~ r \ I ~N N rn - -l 2 E r \ ~ r r `r 56. JASMINE WAY R,~(TO 8E VACATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ , r ~ S ~ F- I a d a N \ r \ tr r `ti N Z W ~ W ~ ~ A parcel of land being a portion of Jasmine Way (Ewing Avenue) Right-of•Way, ~ Z Q according to MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in Plat Baok 3, page 43 of the Public 1 N X~ ~ .t9: r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,r o ~,9. ~z Ijw- ~ W Z ~ Records of Pinellas County, Florida, lying within Section 16, Township 29 South, .3 ' i P: ~ (A Q ~ I Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as 1 _:v ~ , 1 D v ~ v "mi•, va r.^w-ir 4 ~ W W ' _ P ~ D A ~ ' 4 - r ~ b..,. D y7 P 1 " P.: D 1x52 ~P ';f9"E W W ~ O d follows: N00'S203 E r-- 24:50' o , a 26.60 P 23. > 20.43 ~ ~ • ~ ~ . ~ ° d I ' ' . ~ ~ 23.00 0 ' 23.00 23.21 ; : ` D o , 'o P ~ ° q 23.21' ° : ' 23A0 ~ 23.00' ` : . d 23.00' ~ ~ ` ~ ~ 23.00' ~ ~ ~ 21.84' ~ ~ o e ' I BEGIN at the Southwest corner of Lot 5, Block 28, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in • ~ - .Plat Book 3, page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence . -23.00 - - tr: _ ° ~ ~ g " , . " _ ~ ,.e~ .~~'N00,5339~E.137.05 ~:e ~o .7.35 ~ e • ~ ° ~ • ' ° ~ ' • " ~ o` ' ° ° ~ S68°50'05"E, along the North Right•of--Way Tine of Jasmine Way (Ewing Avenue), ~ o ~ ~1 01341d:..E'.~.1~;5.f2~'~ ~ 1 12 N 00 53 39 E 141.81 - - N ~ ~ . ' ° ~ . , , D ° 11.59 I N ?S. , ° ~ • ~ ' . • ° • according to said MAGNOLIA PARK (being the basis of bearings for this legal -'o ~ ~ •o OD ~ to 3Q T pe 2. ~ , , description), same being the South line of Block 28, said MAGNOLIA PARK, for ° / % ^ 279.70 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot B, said Block 28, same being the v 00 ~ au ~g~ F N' d co ' point of intersection with the East Right-of•Way line of the Atlantic Coast W rn ~ to cn N N to cn N to ~ ~ ~ I ~ N DD 00 d1 QJ Q O Railroad, according to said MAGNOLIA PARK; thence S02°31'02"W, along said East o / Right•of--Way line of the Atlantic Coast Rallroad, far 60.02 feet to the point of a N rn rn u+ t0 m c0o vt c°DO cn ~ N N intersection with the South Right•of•Way line of said Jasmine Way (Ewing ~ 34 m 33 ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~o o ~o ~o ~o ~o 32 ~ . 31 29 Q Q 0~ ~P (A O N t0 N O N 2 V 7 O O O Q+ s OD Avenue), same being the Northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 33, said MAGNOLIA PARK; / ~ thence leaving said East Right~of-Way line of the Atlantic Coast Railroad, D Q 2 ~ • ~ N N N O 26 O 25 pD , N • N O N 24 O 23 rT1 N s a o n i = W O hl / ~ ~ N88°50'05"W, along said South Right-of•Way line of Jasmine Way (Ewing Avenue), o 41 Wrn rn m m m m m m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ same being the North line of Block 33, said MAGNOLIA PARK, for 276.00 feet to C ~ N ~ m : N O 0D ~ m ~ rn R A SE NT ~ ~ C the Northwest corner of Lot 1, said Block 33, same being the point of a 'D ~ intersection with the East Right-of-Way line of South Ft. Harrison Avenue, ~ -P , N Rl ~ according to said MAGNOLIA PARK; thence N00°53'39"E, along said East O1 N \ ~ Right•of-Way line of South Ft. Han•ison Avenue, for 60.00 feet to the POINT OF ~ ~ ~ ~ D BEGINNING. . ~ 27.06 23,00' l 23.00' 23.00' 23.00' ~ 4.57 C 15.85 7.36 18.66 23.02' ~ ~ Containing 16,732 square feet or 0.384 acres, more or less. ° U v N 01'09'07" 23.02 23.02' , E 134.91 ~ - 23.02 21.as' W ~ Error of closure: 0.0033 feet (LCS} o N 00 5 55 E " s 60. 0' m r ~ }3 ,72' S 03'07'28" W 270,31' 1' N ~ E o° 03'0728" E _ o 24 1 0 ~ o ~ 24 a \ ® ~ „ . ,l i C 0 N ~ ~ C q I , CJ7 D ~ D MAGNOLIA PARK J ~ - v - ~ MAGN( -o -I D 29 MAGNOLIA PARK I ~ ' r~ ~ " ~ ; ' N • 32 P.B. 3, PG. 43 ~ m ~ o ~ m P.B... ~ wl o P.B. 3, PG. 43 t.:`S~'~0~~ s° ~ 3 o ~ ~ p~~ .v~~ o a N ~ W N _ .3 ~ ~ ° LL N PREPARED FORS SHEET DESCRIPTION: F ~YC~ 47 IESCRIPTION % DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY EP o CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE a JWD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED E DRAWN L PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED CONSULTANTS, ORIDA DESIGN INC. GWI INVESTMENTS, INC. JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES 122 B. 8 PG. SHT. 2B N 11 JMS AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 2514 PROSPECT ROAD t CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE P 3030 Starke Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 TAMPA, Florida 33629 PRELIMINARY PLAT 4-05-04 ADDED EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT DATE.. OC ° Tel: (727) 849-7588 - Fax. (727) 848-3648 TEL (813) 258-5240 FAX (813) 258-5241 APP-) 03115!04 r N Q.C. E.B. No. 7421 NO. DATE REVISIONS By OF oQ i Y EM ~ i 7Q R W ~ h ° D b _ _A o o i-~y~ y1 INLET --.a_~~_ _ ~ y LEGEIV~ 2 ti ~ » ~ + , IE E= 1.10 - ~ m ~,y , • y y~ 0 5 39 E 108.11 2 ' ~ 'IE N S=31.. a 28 y y ~ ~ ^y. N 00 53 3, _ , yy, ~y- - - - r ~ , =Overland flow Direction ~ ~ - - N 00°53'39"E~y4 1 8.0~ ; .t.~ 6.~~~~~~'r, ~,.;~----1 - r1 r~, M r~ ~ M \ o 20 a ~f- =Concentrated Flow Direction ~ o o ~y~° yy ~ b~ ` ' 1 'ly " 4~~ + • + M M ~ .o - ~--~C =Hard Surface Drainage Flow Direction CLEANOUT" - ~ 1 - ~ -p; a~J l~7 - a i MM'1~' CLEANOUT IE=32.25 ti8 130 LF 12 AD ~ • c; + Y - ~ IE=32.25 YARD DRAT ® .50% ~ +'~y' ne A 52.68 =Lot Grading Type & Min. finish Floor Elev. ~ y~ }3y. SIGHT TRI NGLE " ' 1• 130 LF 12 ~ -130 LF 12" ADS ,yy`~ + 1~ • ® ~ ~'~no SIGHT IANGLE YAR DRAIN YAR DRAIN ®0.50% ~ r~~ =Pro osed Storm Structure Number + ~ a`~ y? y2 ,y, a o _ 17 p oy ~m r' J y, ~ ~Q ,~ti FF- FF=37.78 +~5 +~6 O ~ fig' 1 2 3 4 ST P SIGN 5~ t ( ) Q`~' =Proposed Spot Elevation o ao 7 ~ goo ~ya• FF=37.28 0 6 i END WALL o + •}.y`'' +yy~ n ~j 0 f0 20 40 ~~`~U 9 O ~~~6 10 6• =Existing Spot Elevation +yy m ~ ~ y ~ N ' i ~ END WALL +yy~ .i-'~y' rU ~ 28'R 28'R = Proposed Storm Structure & Pipe •yF~' - - x~. - Q - - = Pro osed ADS Yord Drain Structure & Pi a - - ~ - - - - - ~~r~h F i - - -P- - - - - - - 'r -i-~~~ P p as +~i ~ o ,~.fi,: ~ Vic,. ~ \ UI Q = Existin Storm Pipe 0~ 1~ 9 N 9 10 0.5%~ ~ INLET k+ N y ~ ~y a yy5 y`~~' , o ~ GE=35.13 , 'h~'~ 4: - v- R5-~ (D0~ NOT ENTER) 6 ,~19+ ~W` oti IE=30.90:` ~ h ~c ~'e0 0P ~ R5-1 (DO NOT ENTER) ` ~ - ~ t ~ O ~ 3 - I p - 28' - _ 6' HIGH WALL nx' ` , NOTES: + ~ ~ - ~ aQ ti" ~6;i SEE LANDSCAPE ARCH - PLANS FOR DETAIL + J_ a ° 28 R L UNITS HAVE 2 CAR GARAGE. - . g~ ~ 1 AL .N ~ ~ ~4, • ~ I + n D BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. k b~ 43 42 y~ ~~k. o 26'R W ~ ~ ~6, X66 2 ADS YARD DRAIN INLETS TO BE FIELD LOCATE y, ~ ~ ~ _i~ ~ ~ 12 11 1. 13+~F~~ 14 ~ ~ + 0 +y~ 12 j d ? ~ _ 3 SEE LANDSCAPE ARCH. PLANS FOR FURTHER DETAIL ON TREES TO REMAIN. y~5 INLET m FF-3 FF=37.03 O ~f=~`'~ y 13 52 LF 15" RC FF=3716 GE=34.80 ~ ~6 h~~ ~ v .}.^r' 00 INLET ® 0.39% ~ IE S =31.25 • • _ GE= 4.50 + IE N =31.00 ~ - ~ GEO-MAT MATERIAL IE N SE=31.45 iy 6 I _ ,a.~ r" 24' - N 00 9 05 - k ~ ~ ~ E ~ N 01'09 5"E by 1+ ~ 15 C\3 CJ / ~~6 26.96' bo ~ 3 ~ ? ~ + INLET ~ \ ~ ~ f:~' INL -I~fi• _ GE=34.60 :,yy. m ~ ~ G - 5.01 0 . -i- IE NW=31.55 + ~ TREE TO 80 L 18" RCP n~ ~ =3 .70 r ~ -Fy~`• ~ BE SAVED + y"6 ! ~ o (WEE, ' HATCHED SIDEWALK r ~ ~ ® 0. 8% ~ k, y • W/IN DRIP LINE TO BE y~~ y y y n: rt 14 - hy~. -h~~9 UI g ~ W ! O • CONSTRUCTED AT + + ~'H ° ~1 INLET EXISTING GRADE a• " ~ + ~ +y~ GE=34.9() 1 16 .~,,,h ~ ~ +y ' F 15 RCP cn O- ' ~ ~ ~ 9 IE=30.95 I ~ ~ -'a' ~ -I-~°~. 6' HIGH WALL "y1 ~ J ° 6 LF 18 RCP •a ~gti NOTE: SEE LANDSCAPE ARCH + "I~, • ~ ~ ® ~ 0.31 % PLANS FOR DETAIL 6 EX. TREE ^~~y f~; O ti :yy. ~'m ~ NORTHERN MOST ROADWAY IS 1 (ONE) WAY WEST ONLY. ,yh~ DRIP LINE -P~.;. a ~ ~ 15 J m 3 F 1"S j• ~j ~ ~=J ~ y° ,-Q + ' 4A 'S ~ .7 r ~ FF=37.03 I ~ ~ O / Mt l~ JJ ~ ~ ro v v h a ~ W _ _ ~ ti ~ , 1 ~ p - ~r:~ n wO o ~ ~ o y ~ + y. , ~ . ~+y ~ y _ ~ o INLET _ y3y 'i DASkI,ED LINE ~ ~ -I-'~`'~ •1 0) yea o IE W 0.5 - ~ + IE =30. y ,AASHED LIN + REPRESENTS ROOF IE =30.75 k ~ ' Z ~Q ~ I E=30.50 OVERHANG ( ) ,y~. ~ ygC~' ~ a 38 ~,~6 `I qr y 35 ~ - ~ + , . A~. ~r~ ~y 40 39 FF=36.58 + n. 2 2 >a ~ 21 20 19 ~ ci^ J ~ 21 ~ INLET 28~ GE=34.77 to ~ ~ N . L' ` O i-' g~' ~ J O IE S=29.4 + . IE NE=29.4 -l'~a~ co ® 5 ~ ~ 1,~° ~~5 INLET J GEO-MAT MATERIAL • '2e ~'co 60 LF 24" RCP = 108 LF 24" ' • 'S2' GE=34.77' " ~6 ~ ~ \ STORM INLET HEADWALL yy. +3y' ~ 0.33% U RCP ~ 0.19% IE W-30.30 y RCP ®0.29% gy, 70 LF "RCP h1 ~ TOP EI.EU.=34.67 N TOP=35.30 0 ~ S T ? ~ IE N=29. o IE=30.20 a' 'S5' 0'S%~ ~~-qq,,,~ti ~ ~ IE S=29. r.~ 0.5%~ ® 0.29% TJ . ~ R6-1 (ONE WAY) 'E y ~ N INV.=3L71 ~ Q=-q ~ 3 ~ DRAINAGE CONTROL SE INU.=31.65 n. O 9 ~-'~r N ~ • STRUCTURE S1V INV.=31.65 ~ .i.+7y~ ___--.---•._.---•--"r'~-'^" a ~,~"J ary~, .~~1 n~ ~ +05% ~7' n~.G tiG 3,~:~ ~ 0'5% a +~y2~ ~ 0.5%? ~,~5?' h~ 42 LF 4" RCP\, TOP ELE.=34.15 I ~ r_,z___..._..._..___. + ~ ® 0.4 <3 SLOT ELEV.=33.12 c~ $ ~ ~ c~ , • \ ~ NE INV.=32.10 3 '-F~~` ~ s ~.°-.s . a ~ _ ~ti~ 6' HIGH CHAIN ; N + w ~3: ~ LINK FENCE > t +tio; ~~96 ~ _ ~y, N 01 °34'11 "E 135.12' - g 3 _ - ~ _ -;:y - - - a~1o - _ _ -I- ~ aREMOVE XISIING ~ (0 r _ _ _ _ ~ ' ~ - _ ~ . ~ PIPE AN PLUG F - z ~ - + _____----.,.~~yti~ ~ INVERT ~ ~ 8-Lf"2~RCP ~~2~rR.G,~.+M'~a o ~ 6 - + ~ ~ t . 'h~'4 g 32 31 ~x• y ~ 30 29 ~ • o 28 Z--" - 2% FF=37.70 N FF=36.49 INl ® rn °7 24" FES INV.=31.48 ~ u, F=36.49 INLET '0 IE=29.00 g ~ 00 FF=36.58 GE GE=34.77 rn ~ CS m 5 IE SEE DETAIL ~ 00 .y~" IE ~ ~ L J IE N=29.60~~,'=~ ~ RIM R 5 50 FILTER DRAIN ~o N SHEET 5 39 LF 15" RCP I ^ ~ ~ E IE SW=29.20 (SEE DETAIL -I~' ) - II _ IE NE=29.20 SHEET 5) ®0.50% 22 m r y Z 6 'v,.. S 01'09'07 134.91' a ~ ~ - ~ ° ? J~~~~ ~1 ~ ~ 26 LF 15" RCP ~ ° STOR MH o ~ c n - ~ ~ ~ RIM=3 .70 ~ _ ®0.77% ..L~ IE NW 31.45 v S 00 52 55 W 60.20 N ~ ~ IE S= .20 v C ' ~ + ~ IE N 28.2 0 ~k, ~ 315 LF SWALE E ® 0.20% REMOVE EXISTING + +~~~s S 03°07'2$"~1 2]Q, 1' 12 15" RCP ~ ~ a m PIPE AND CAP AT 1 v ~ ~F PROPERTY LINE ~ 1• % +~k~ o - ~ ' 6' HIGH CHAIN STORM INLET S' RIM EL ~ +~k;~ : _ +'~k5 LINK FENCE TOP ELEU,=3 . i N ~ 9 _ ~ . E INV.=28.0 ~ : i= a 0 ,~.y~" ~ ; +~~5 PLUG EK G ~.i "7 . ~r N 3 a ~h,~' ~5 ~ r,~ SOUTH WEST o "7 INVER ' d ~ 2~ ~ ~ ~ ` m i + ~ . '.rub F:, D C O 3:. 99 i~3 r 7 1v` `o THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY PREPARED FOR: SHEET DESCRIPTION: DESIGNED tIPTION: o CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE o JWD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED M r.. LL- a DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES E~i22 ° j AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS GWI INVESTMENTS, INC. JMS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS F.B. B PG. SHT. 3 N CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. 25IO PROSPECT ROAD 0 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 TAMPA, Florida 33629 HORIZONTAL CONTROL/ .2 .21 OC Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 N QQ TEL (813) 258-5240 FAX (813) 258-5241 PAVING E.B. No. 7421 ' 4 V I N G, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 5/10/04 REVISED PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS DATE. Q 6 NO. DATE REVISIONS APPYD 03115104 GF C) Y EM Q ~ SIGN TS ~ ? WER COI~I.IC SIGN FOR WATERISE STATEMENT o R w SEPARATI~V FlRE DEPARTMENT 7 STANDARD - NORTH • ~ IN FlRE DEPARTMENT _ LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL CONNECTION 1 SANITARY SEWERS CROSSING UNDER WATER MAINS SHALL BE BUILDING (UNITS 6-10) 8"x8" TAPPING TEE & VALVE RELOCATE CONNECTION -SOUTH / OF 12 INCHES BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF THE UPPER PIPE AND THE OUTSIDE BELL/TOP OF THE ~ - BY CITY OF CLEARWATER EXISTING FH DISTANCE ~ _ _ BUILDING (UNITS 1-5) R PIPE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. SANITARY SEWERS CROSSING OVER WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID TO - - SOUTH OF _ OWE _ _ - - L OTTOM OF THE 8» yyl,,l ENTRANCE ROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE BELL/B EXISTING - - - _ _ _ _ _ ~ J UPPER PIPE AND THE TOP OF THE LOWER PIPE WHEREVER POSSIBLE. ~ .F j ~ 8 - - - - ROSS A WATER MAIN WITH LESS THAN THE REQUIRED VERTICAL DISTANCE, BOTH _ ~ PVC WM 2 WHERE SANITARY SEWERS C _ _ ER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CLASS 54 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AT THE - - ~ THE SEWER AND THE WAT _ USED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 10 FEET - CROSSING. SUFFICIENT LENGTHS OF DIP MUST BE ;3 , ALL JOINTS ON THE WATER MAIN WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE CROSSING MUST BE _ BETWEEN ANY TWO JOINTS. _ - - LEGEND C L CLEARANCE OF 6 INCHES MUST BE - - - - LEAK FREE, AND MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED. A MINIMUM VERTI A RELOCATE ~ ~ I Z MAINTAINED AT THE CROSSING. Flip =Proposed Water Line & Valve RRANGED SO THAT THE SEWER PIPE JOINTS AND THE WATER MAIN PIPE JOINTS EL=35.1 3 ALL CROSSINGS SHALL BE A ED ON THE CROSSING . FDC ARE EQUIDISTANT FROM THE POINT OF CROSSING (PIPES CENTER ) 0 10 20 40 G PIPE THE NEW PIPE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP 2 4 H AN EXISTIN ~ 3 4 WHERE A NEW PIPE CONFLICTS WIT 5 - =Existing Sanitary Sewer Line TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE. `9 SSING SHALL BE ARRANGED 6 8 AND THE CRO 8 10 EEN ANY TYPE OF SEWER AND 5 A MINIMUM 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETW _ _ ~ - =Existing Watermcin & Valve WATER MAIN IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. TION THE WATER MAIN I FDC 6 IN CASES WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARA , ON ONE SIDE OF r r MUST BE LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH OR ON AN UNDISTURBED EARTH SHELF LOCATED AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAIN IS AT LEAST _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - - - THE SEWER OR FORCE MAIN ~ ~ ~ ~ I s- ~ 79 LF 8 , - _ _ _ 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. 'PVC WM I ~ ~ ~ =Existing Fire Hydrant ~ - - g- - i - - l - -g- - T CAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES IN PARALLEL INSTALLATIONS, I ~ j I I i 1 7 WHERE IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN A VER I I THE SIZE PROPOSED WITH A MINIMUM ~ 1 1 1 THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF DIP (IF AVAILABLE IN ) I 1 1 I I I j ~ ~ =Proposed Fire Hydrant R MAIN SHOULD ALWAYS BE ABOVE THE SEWER. JOINTS ON(~7 1 1 1 228 LF 1 PVC ®0.50% VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 6 INCHES. THE WATE 1 I I I I ~ I / J LOCATED AS FAR APART AS POSSIBLE FROM JOINTS ON THE SEWER OR FORCE SAN MH 1 I I I aY I 1 1 THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RIM=35.84 I 1 I 1 1 i i 1 ~ ~ =Proposed Fire Deportment Connection RED JOINTS . - I I I 1 MAIN {STAGGE ) IE-29.29 I I I 8 CROSS » I 1 I j ~ j © (NOTE: EACH FDC WILL HAVE A FREE STANDING SIGN WITH THE WORDING 1 I I j , 8 GV; I 1 I 8 ALL DIP SHALL BE CLASS 54 OR HIGHER. ADEQUATE PROTECTIVE MEASURES AGAINST CORROSION SHALL 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 SAN MH " NO PARKING FIRE LANE BY ORDER OF CLEARWATER FIRE DEPARTMENT") I I I BE USED. j j j ~ RIM=35.85 IE S=28.14 " TINED BETWEEN THE TOP OF ALL WATER MAINS AND THE - - - -S- _ -S _ _ _ _ s 9 A MINIMUM COVER OF 30 (2.5) SHALL BE MAIN A _ _ - s- - _ _.S_ _ s IE NE=28.04 8" WM PROPOSED GROUND TYPICAL). ( 8" 90' BEND ~ ~ 118 LF 8 8" GV FlRE LINE (TYP) r PVC WM SEE DETAIL 125 LF 8= 125 LF 8" 8" 90' CCORDANCE WITH CITY OF CLEARWATER SEWER SYSTEM " THIS SHEI~T PVC WM 8"X4"TEE ~ PVC WM BEND 1 ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN A 55 LF B PVC WM PECIFICATIONS 45 44 SPECIFICATIONS AS WELL AS CONTRACTS 43 42 ' 41 LF 8 STANDARDS AND 41 1,~ 11 13 ~ Pvc wM 13 14 2 NO DEBRIS SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ENTER THE EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM Fl E UNE (TYP) 4" GV BACKFLOW PREVENTOR DEVICE AS REQUIRED BY C NSTRUCT AND S DETAIL 3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL BRACING, SHEETING OR SHORING NECESSARY TO 0 IS SHEET SHALL ADHERE TO THE TRENCH SAFETY ` CITY STANDARD DETAILS PROTECT THE EXCAVATION AGAINST COLLAPSING. ALL CONSTRUCTION FHA ACT REQUIREMENTS. TRENCHES SHALL BE KEPT DRY WHILE PIPE 15 BEING LAID. DEWATERING SHALL BE ? EL=36.0 PROVIDED WHERE NECESSARY.' _ FDC PROPOSED - ~ PLANTER AREA OIL. WET UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WILL BE REPLACED WITH COMPACTED 4 PIPE WILL BE ON DRY, UNDISTURBED S SELECTED BACKFlLL MATERIAL AS APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. w - 88 LF 8" PVC WM / 4" GV LL MATERIAL WILL BE SOLIDLY TAMPED AROUND THE PIPES IN 6" LAYERS UP TO A LEVEL OF AT LEAST 4~r 5 RACKET ONE F00T ABOVE THE TOP OF THE PIPE. IN AREAS TO BE PAVED, BACK-FlLL WILL BE COMPACTED TO A 15 N MATCHLINE (THIS SHEET) ' ERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE METHODS PRE-SCRIBED IN MINIMUM OF 98% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY AS DET AASHTO T-180 IN 12" LAYERS TO THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT. " FDC I TYPICAL 4" FIRE LINE ~ 6 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER ' 8 22.5' BEND ~ 1 ' 7 THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR OF ALL PRECAST MANHOLES SHALL BE COATED WITH AT LEAST 15 MILS DRY THICKNESS OF PROCO EP-214-351 EPOXI-MASTIC AS MANUFACTURED BY PROTECTIVE COATINGS INC. 0 0 16 N ~ ~ J 0 ® J U 1 ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AND THE DOMESTIC WATER DISTRIBUTION a SYSTEM SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT SPECIFICAITONS AND CITY OF CLEARWATER 71 LF 8" PVC WM Q I SPECIFlCAl10NS. y 8" 22.5' BEND ~ N'o ~ uo R MAINS SHALL BE 30" MIN BELOW PROPOSED GRADE AT THE WATER MAIN CENTER LINE. 2 WATE ( ) EXIST TREE DRIP UNE 17 ~ DRUID ROAD ~ J mx RIGHT-OF-WAY N 3 ALL POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE SHALL BE LAID WITH AN INSULATED 12 GAUGE A.W.G. SOLID STRAND COPPER WIRE WOUND AROUND THE PIPE FORMING ONE COMPLETE SPIRAL PER JOINT OF PIPE: THIS WIRE IS TO BE ~ ~ J CONTINUOUS WITH SPLICES MADE ONLY BY METHODS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. THIS WIRE IS TO BE SECURED TO ALL VALVES, TEES, AND ELBOWS. SEE ARTICLE 41.02(8)(2) PART B TECHNICAL SPECIFICP,..~NS, CITY OF CLEARWATER CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS. I ~ _ ( ° f J EWER AND STORMSEWER LINES TO BE 10' HORIZOivfAL ~ ~ 4 MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY S AND 18" VERTICAL. 18 ~ ~ i ~ 91 LF B" PVC WM ~ 5 POTABLE WATER SERVICE WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF CLEARWATER. 8" 22.5' BEND J 6 SAMPLE TAPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT 500 FT. INTERVALS ALONG MAINS AND AT ALL TEMPORARY BLOW OFF LOCATIONS. 56 LF 8" PVC WM 7 LENGTHS ARE f FROM CENTER OF FITTING TO CENTER OF FITTING. SAN MH I J 36 38 UCTILE IRON 35 37 DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLIES TO BE RESTRAINED, D 4O ER METERS AND DOUBLE 39 8 ALL FIRE LINE AFT » RIM=EXISTING GROUND CLASS 350 (200 psi). 8 90' BEND 140 ~ 8» FDC EL=35.7 ® IE SW,NE=24.71 ~ 22 FIRE UNE TYP) PVC WM 21 9 THE CITY OF CL.EARWATER, AT THE APPLICANT'S EXPENSE, WILL RELOCATE ANY/ALL WATER METERS THAT HAVE TO 21 20 19 26 LF 8" PVC BE RELOCATED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. EE DETAIL FHA _ _ _ IS SHEET 150 - - _ _ _ EL=36.0 150 LF 8" ~ ®0.42q PVC WM FDC SAN MH C TY STANDARDS. - - - - - - I PVC 10 ALL WATER/FlRE UNE EXTENSIONS TO CONFORM TO I ~ I I I I - ~ I I I I 8" GV 1 - ~ RIM=34.94 11 THE CITY OF CLEARWATER WILL PROVIDE WATER TAP, SET THE METER AND A B.F.P.D. (BACK FLOW PREVENTOR g s I s 1 I j IE SW=27.16 ~ J o _ _ IE S=27.41 DOGHOUSE MANHOLE ~N DEVICE IF APPLICABLE. APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ASSOCIATED FEES. s s S ~ I s - _ _ ~ ~ ` _ ~ ` ---1 IE NE=27.06 (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET 6) ~ j ~ 1 1 I I ~ I IE=24.60 ~ ~ o`, 1 I I ~ 8" 90'~ a I I I I 299 LF 8" PVC ®0.50% 1 8 I I I ~ END I 28 LF 8" PVC ~ ~ ~ I 1 I I 1 SAN MH I 1 =A I 1 1 I ®0.42% RIM-35.05 I IE=28.90 1 1 I I 1 I C I I ~ I r~ : I ~ 3 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~1 iaT~ I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I j I I ~ ~ ~ - S;~N MH o 1 PVC ~ (6' A!~ 8') 3ANITARY SEWER ~ I I I I ~ 1 '1 ~ j j ; RIM=35.50 r,,. ; IE SW=26.94 Q } .3 PVC PIPE SDR35 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE SEWER PIPE SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM D-3D34 SDR35 D-1784 (PVC s s s s s s {E NE=25.94 I v COMPOUND), LATEST REVISION, OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. ALL PVC SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CONSPICUOUSLY ~ 1 ~ I 1 1 s i s 1 ; LABELED WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S NAME, NOMINAL PIPE SIZE, APPLICABLE MATERIAL CODE OR PVC CELL ~ I = , I ~ 1 1 1 S I S 1 S S z. LJ ~ ~ CLASSIFICATION, STANDARD DIMENSION RATIO NUMBER, PRODUCT TYPE, STANDARD SPECIFICATION DESIGNATION, I _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - I- - - _ - I ~ PRODUCTIONS RECORD CODE AND NSF CERIIFlCATION SEAL AND WILL BE COLOR CODED GREEN, PIPE WILL BE A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ` ~ a~ MAXIMUM 13' LAYING LENGTH. APPROVED PRODUCTS: J-M/BLUE BRUTE, H&W, E.T.I. CERTAINTEED (W/INTEGRAL UNE (TYP ~ s ~ s - BELL), AQUA-TITE, NORTHSTAR, CANTEX, VULCAN, DAMS-DAViITE. - SE - z J `o _ 5EE DETAIL ~ ~ THIS SHEET FlRE U FlRE LINE (TYP) ~ 2 PVC PEE (LESS THAN 4') wATER D~'iR®l1TION 5EE DE THIS SHEET 140 " ~ 33 THIS S " 34 GRADE 1 PVC 32 SF APPROVED TYPE 1 3 1 PVC PIPE LESS THAN 4 SHALL BE MADE FROM CLEAN, NEW N 30 29 J CO FORMING TO ASTM SPECIFICATIONS D1784 AND D2241 OR LATEST REVISIONS THEREOF, AND BE 28 ,~7 N AT 23 DEGREES C ~ SUITABLE FOR USE AT MAXIMUM HYDROSTATIC WORKING PRESSURES OF 200 PSI 26 25 24 ~ 23 8 (73.4 DEGREES F). PIPE SHALL BE FURNISHED IN STANDARD 20' LENGTHS WITH JOINTS BEING OF a I ~ o THE PUSH-QN INTEGRAL BELL TYPE SUPPLIED WITH GASKETS INSTALLED. PIPE SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE NSF MARK INDICATING ITS APPROVAL FOR POTABLE WATER. ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLEAN AND ENDS E SHALL BE TARPED DURING SHIPMENT. APPROVED PRODUCTS: J-M, CERTAINTEED WITH INTEGRAL BELL, ' O N a HEP, H&W. O u v 3 PVC PIPE (4' Aft ABOVE) wATEft DISTFI~uTION - _ - - - » _ SAN MH 1 ~ PVC PIPE (C900): PVC PIPE (4" AND LARGER) SHALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA C900, WITH ~ ~ ~ - RIM=34.50 `~o { c IE SW,NE=25.36 ®.n ~ PUSH-ON INTEGRAL BELL JOINTS AND SUPPLIED IN STANDARD 20 LENGTHS. NO SOLVENT-CEMENT ~ PIPE OR FITTINGS WILL BE ACCEPTED. ALL 4" PIPE SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 150 WITH A DR E OF 18. PVC PIPE 6" AND ABOVE SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 150 WITH A DR OF 18. PIPE SHALL N BE MARKED AS DETAILED IN AWWA C900 AND BE FURNISHED WITH AN AFFIDAVIT THAT IT COMPLIES WITH ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " THE REQUIREMENTS OF AWWA C900. ALL PIPES INSIDE FIRE PROTECTION LOOP WITHIN BUILDING ® PERIMETERS SHALL BE PRESSURE CLASS 200 WITH A DR OF 14. ALL PIPE FURNISHED UNDER THIS - SPECIFlCA110N WILL BE COLOR CODED BLUE. ALL PIPE SHALL BE CLEANED AND ENDS SHALL BE NOTE: U C 0 TARPED DURING SHIPMENT. APPROVED PRODUCTS: J-M/BLUE BRUTE, H&W, E.T.I. CERTAINTEED N 1 2 (W/INTEGRAL BELL), AQUAl1TE, NORTHSTAR CAN-TEX, VULCAN, DAMS DAVTITE. 1 ALL WATERLINES TO BE PVC (C-900) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. i ~ SAN MH ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ RIM=34.30 o CLASS 51 4' ~ 4~ D11C11~-E 9~ON Pl1SH"ON1 PEE, CLASS 50 (6'12 2 LOCAl10N OF EXISTING SANITARY LATERALS AND EXISI1NG POTABLE IE SW,NE=2 .23 ~ ~ . ~ ~~~t' I ~ DUCTILE IRON PUSH-ON PIPE SHALL BE THICKNESS OF THE APPROPR?ATE CLASS AND SHALL WATERMANS PER CITY OF CLEARWAIER UTILITY ATLAS. CONTRACTOR 1. ABOVE-GROUND AND UNDER-GROUND UTILITIES ARE IN THE CONFORM TO AWWA C151 X76 AND AWWA C111-79, OR LASTEST REVISION THEREOF. PIPE SHALL BE TO VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUC110N. FURNISHED IN NORMAL 18 LAYING LENGTHS WITH AU_ JOINT MATERIAL INCLUDING GASKETS AND AREA OF THIS PROJECT. PROCEED WITH CAUTION -CALL ~o~ ~ ~ LUBRICANTS. PIPE SHALL BE LINED WITH A STANDARD THICKNESS CEMENT LINING AND SHALL "SUNSHINE" AND THE UTILITY OWNER(S) 2 DAYS IN ADVANCE N CONFORM TO AWWA C104-80. APPROVED PRODUCTS: CLOW, AMERICAN CAST IRON-FASTITE, US PIPE BEFORE BEGINNING WORK 1-800-432-4770. N i & FOUNDRY, McWANE-TYTON, GRIFFlN. , ~ LINE'` i ~H I~; _ ~ _ ~ , _ C ' O X a i DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE of THE QUALITY PREPARED FOR: SHEET DESCRIPTION: 'IPTION: N~ '699-20,3< 0 o CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE s JWD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED EPN o DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED CONSULTANTS FL ORIDA DESIGN ¦ J U AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS t GWI INVESTMENTS, INC. JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES 122 0 F.B. 8 PG. SHL 4 O c"I JMS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS ° CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. 2510 PROSPECT ROAD 0 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 TAMPA, Florida 33629 UTILITY PLAN OC Tel: (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 N TEL (813) 258-5240 FAX (813) 258-5241 Q1 5/10/04 REVISED PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS DATE: G a a O.C. NO. DATE REVISIONS ABYro 03115104 of y EM E.B. No. 7421 Y ties • ~ -POST OPTIONS: WOOD 2~" MINA OP110NAL POST POSITION " " ti pace WOOD 2 x4 n o~ ~0~~ '1 3' Transition Sid st"r~ R°"luiref OAK 1~ x1>~ p~F , ~~°~ons~ Remove Curb if Existing - - STEEL 1.33 LBS FT MIN Q tiY~e~ Exist Conc Drrve l t o~ Q 20 ~ ~ 12" 12" 6 MAX ~ PRINCIPLE POST A ~ A Back of Curb Mox Slope ~1" 1"~ M~ F PATTERN CANT- Non-slip surface require- l l" 1~-2-~ Max Siope - ~ ED 20 DE REES meets, see Note & •R ~ TOWARDS FLOW 4" ' ~ ~ •~r•• ~ • ' 4" 1/2" Exp. Joint finish To Existing Surface With 1 /2" Exp. Joinf 1 /2 Ey I~ PC III Asphaltic Concrete FILTER FABRIC ~ Pr art R.o,w, une TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION w ~S SECTION fY o0 ~6,~ ~6'~ ~ ~ FILTER FABRIC IN Conc. Sidewalk ~ CONFORMANCE WITH B B ~ ~ SEC. 985 FDOT SPEC. SILT FLOW PLAN VIEW O ) ~ • • , • . ~ • . • Or•Iginal Paving ~n M ~ o .P • ~ Original ~q~e • R - CV ~ U ~ 0 0 4' Min ftesidentiai Street 1' entici Street 1' Cit R W Remove Back of Curb on State or Vertical Curbs with a vertical Saw cut ~ 0 5' Min Arterial Street 2' :riol Street 2~ County R/ or Remove entire Curb and Replace as Part of Sidewalk Ramp. M N I- \ ompacted Base -Thickness of Original + 2' SEC110N m Modified and Valley Gutter Curbs 1/4" per Foot Foot Minimum Thickness 8' join exist bock of curb d. r „ Textured Surface " SILT FENCE DETAIL 1„ 12 Max Slope 'T~:~••:•~L, Back of Curb 3000 psi Conc 4 Thick. Cc . 12' 12' nc 4" Thick. Constr. NOTES M © ' ' 6 Thick of Driveways with NTS Driveways with Compacted ' 6x6 X10 Welded Wire Mesh. ~'~•~a' • Remove to an See Note 7. ded YNre Mesh. Backflll 1 Trench backfllled In 9' compacted N EROSION CONTROL MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR 1/2" Expansion Joint even joint or sawcut OTE: ALL Undisturbed layers, Density taken every 300 ft, Trench Slde TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. 2 Base may be replaced with Asphaltic SECTION A-A SECTION B-B NOTES: Concrete with prior approval of - Clty Engineer, 1, Provide Taded Joints At Dlataices Matching The Width. 8. Ramps Shdl Hove a TactNe Surface, Textured to a 3 Dn longitudinal Installation requiring resurfacing full width of pavement, f oo Ptace Expaielan Joints At Driveways Depth Not ExceedMg 1/8" by use of Tamp ar rdler 2 Some Phyekd Obstruction Extele kfi Prevents In ConWrmance with RequNementa of FDOT • The Placing Of Sidewdks Ae Shown, Contact The Roadway and Troftk Design Standards, DetaN 304 finish base to match existing pavement Engineerhg Dhteion fa Alternate Location. Or Moat Recent NlodNtcations surface and prime. Then resurface as BROOM 3. Wooden Md Other Spacero WNI Not Be Permftted BROOM FINISH FINISH l" °r °r"°"'°y'' 4, No Coalinga Of Any Kind Wll Be Permitted On Concrete Sidewalks Or directed by the City Engineer. / \ ~ 5. AID I C~on~aete Shdl Be~3000t~lin, 0 BeOCRy Engineer. a 1 a ~ . .d e , ' ; • ° B. Concrete Surface to be Light Bropn Flnieh, 'a ~ Z • . • . ~ • ` ' Z Canaete Driveway Conetructlon ehdl be 8" thick w 8x8/10x10 W.W.F.. • ~ i , c , d d . A, ' . t ••q ..e • a,• STREET REPLACEMENT FOR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE CUTS .,,r v ° . d •a a . • ~ ~ ~ • • o ,.t ~ ~ t ~V/'Y.° V~/r~i~ ((//~~~.j//~~~~~~~~~(( ,~~~¦~//~~~~y/~ N ~ Yip, ll~ . . . . N.T.S. • NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX N0. 109 STRUCK JOINT ' 2" x 4" STRUCK JOINT DETAIL N,T,s. B TUMINOUS STRIP N.T.S v NJ.S NJ.S 6" 1 Joint Seal ~ Joint Seal _ _ / ti ~o to BOUNDARY BOUNDARY ~ , 42' 5' VARIES f45' 5' C/L Conc. Conc. Pw't. TYPE D CURB OR I ~MEx ,Joint P _ = Preformed Ji ~MExp, Joint And 9~ 2I ' 9~ SIDEWALK CURB PER Preformed Jolnf FJller PARKING tL, 12' PARKING PLANS DI D Z Z r TYPE D CUI ~ EXISTING ~ THREADED CAP - 'E D CURBy ~ GROUND ~ NT$ NTS m m Z Z EL.=31.00 r- TOT 5:60 ~ _ ~ ~ w 30 MIL PVC = 6" CLEANCUT ASSEMBLY (SEE LANDSCAPE ARCH. I 6 P,V.C, 45' ELBOW I PLANS FOR SECTION DETAILS) 0000000000000 000000000000 ; • PAVER BLOCK 000000000000 Oc; 0000000000 00 0 0 0 o EL=29.00 5 0 000 + a _ 0 0 0 •'r ~ 'r' •'r ' ''r ' BOTTOM-29.00 0 0 0 BASE ~ FILTERDRAIN 00000000 00000000 " 6 45' ELBOW (SEE DETAIL) AT END OF LINE PROPOSED CONCRETE " WALL DESIGN BY OTHERS \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r ••,;'r • .•r: • .•r ~'j', .•r; .,•r;' COMPACTED SUBGRADE (98~ T-180) PVC OR CLAY LINER CLEAN FILL AND SAND EL=27.00 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY f PARKING SECTION GROWN SOD BOTTOM CROSS-SECTION A N.T.S. ERDRAIN LEAN UT DETAIL UI~ NTS 3 C_N •C NTS G~ a c 3 3 0 t CLEAN FILL AND SAND 3 R/W GROWN SOD BOTTOM ~ EL,=30.90 PROPOSED VAULT ~ v EL.=31.OD ° 24' 76't 24' S' _ a ~ a~ 4~ ~ ~ _ o TREATMENT ~ I VOLUME ~ _g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ EL=29.75 i ~ ' ( 00000 ....::k~y~~~`:0000000 -A• c~•+ ~ ~,a _ 30 MIL PVC a• v 00000 ~ r.= EL=29.00 Sryxi~. . ~.a:pti4....+:~ EXISTING 6" DUr. 0 5' O.C. 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~~^~°F,::~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6" PERFORATED P.V.C. PIPE ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 W~ ~;,,ta~;~~a~::~ 0 0 0 OR ADS CORRUGATED POLYTHENE ,i ~ ° GROUND b' ~a.=~~ 0 0 0 0 a°-~~~ ~;wqv'."~ ~ PERFORATED UNDERDRNN ~ 4• A. 0 0 0 0 _ u« ,•~"°'..a tgi:i: 0 0 0 ~ ? - ~t°: ; ,V TOB = 35.0 _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 Met: w• ~°°~~?.;ba~a ~s~y 0 0 EL=28.50 ~ . , n m ~ ~ ~ - - _ ~ _ 0 0 0 0 Mgr =~..».F:~"'°:^.{~'°~:'°w^c:~;. 0 0 0 0 f FLTER .FABRIC ° • ' ' EL=28.00 - o i ~ THE APPROXIMATE GROUND WATER LEVEL IS f31.0 FT. PERSUANT TO I U e GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY NODARCE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. COARSE AGGREGATE ~ ~ ~ . , w . ~ . •A • ~ ~ • • • COARSE AGGREGATE ~ (~57 STONES . ` ' s4 " . ~ (~57 STONE) ° `u°, N A•1 - (TESTING PERFORMED 01). ud g" 6" g" rn _ ® CLEAN FILL AND SAND a GROWN SOD BOTTOM ° ° BOTTOM=29.OD SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FILTER MEDIA TO BE WASHED SILICA SAND PER "FOOT ROAD AND a FOR STRUCTURAL DETAILS. BRIDGE SPECIflCAT10NS" (902-4). UNIFORM(iY COEFF. OF 1.5 OR GREATER, o - N AND 10~i DIAMETER EFFECTNE GRNN SZE OF .20 TO .55 MM. O O C SECTION D-D ' 3 EL=27.00 PVC OR CLAY LINER ORY DETENTION AREA FILTERDRAIN DETAIL FOR VAULT ~ t~~'~~ ~C CROSS-SECTION B a~ a NTS 3 N.T.S. ~ ~ r'' ~ o N N • OVERLAND FLOW ELEVATION FOR STORM EVENT EXCEEDING DESIGN CRITERIA `~~0 ~ c nJ ~ w °i ~ 0\, o~ 0 i DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY PREPARED FOR: SHEET DESCRIPTION: c CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE TION: JOB NO 0 699= - JWD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED a DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED DESIGN CONSULTANTS i EPN I f AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS GWI INVESTMENTS, INC. JAS 0 JMS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES 122 0 CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. 2510 PROSPECT ROAD F.B. 8 PG. 5 O SNT. N 0 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 OC Tel: (727) 849-7588 - Fax, (727) 848-3648 TAMPA, Florida 33629 PAVIN, i PAVING AND DRAINAGE DETAILS N O.C. TEL (813) 258-5240 FAX (813) 258-5241 Q 5/10/04 REVISED PER CITY OF CLEARWATER COMMENTS oarEr ' EM E.B. No. 7421 Y NO. DATE REVISIONS APPYD 03/15/04 GF 0 B C) Q , ~-EXISTING GRADE c~• EXISTING PAVEMENT 4'_;:••;•'.•;•:•••'•'.•.••:'.•;..'-.••••.•.-•.•-•.••'_'••'•'.•-•ti ! EXISTING ROAD BASE J ~ COMPACT IN NOTE: 12 LAYERS G,I. FRAME & CUVER i~ ~ V.S. FC]UNbRY #195 W OR EQUAL l 3 I 1. TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER PAVEMENT - / SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 100% OF . - 1, 1\ f MAXIMUN DENSITY BYA.A.S.H.T.O. T-99, ~ METHOD C. ~ I ± 2. TRENCHES NOT LOCATED UNDER PAVEMENT , I ~ i? Ball Valy HALL E OM ACTED TO A FlRMNESS EQUAL TO THAT OF THE SOIL ADJACENT ~ ~~12" ABOVE PIPE NC NTRIC CDN£ (FLAT CQVET2 TO THE TRENCH. 5 COMPACT IN 6" LAYERS APPROVED BARREL JDINT SEALS CO £ ' ND RAM~NECKS ANHDLES 0 TO ARE D RINGS A ~N SHALLOW M 3. REPLACEMENT OF PAVED SURFACES SHALL '~~-L RI GS AT ALL JOIN . ' N Hose .Bibb~'~ BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE TO APPLI % , TWD CONTINUOUS r ~ 4 DEPTH> CABLE T HA L BE SEALED. 1PATER y~ t. JOIN S S L LOCAL REGULATIONS. . / AL MAIN STEEL REINFaRGEMENT /v y ~ 3/4' Galvanize ~ . - COMPACT IN 5 MIN. WALL THICKNESS TYPE fI ACID RESIST£NT 4' MIN, NT 90Q6 PSI / r,, r , , i ' - ~ GROUT FILL OPENING WITH, PIPE -?~--12" 1 12 12 MIN. NON-SHRINK MgRTAR 2' Galvanize D~. 2'/FT. MIN, TRENCH BACIffLL DETAI - - NTS DETAL w~~ 2 Corporation • 8' 2' JDINT IN PIPE ENTRY (TYPICAU Tapping Saddle Sto Less Check Eck GROUT FL[]W CHANNEL S MANHOLE p PVC PIPE REQUIRE MUELLER H14350 with Lock Wing and - ADAPTER COUPLING BY F'LD Wing and ' CpNTRDL, INC., OR APPROVED ° Corlpression inlet or approved equal ved equal VOTES WATER STOP COUPLING, 1. MIN. MUM CONCRETE CdMPRHENSIVE STRENGTHS 40D0 PSI@2$ DAYS Threaded Corporation Stop a I MUELLER H15008 DESIGN .LOADING H-20 I 3. BASE Sr<GTIAN IS M©NOLIi'HIC or approved equal INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR CDATING a o q, MANHOLES SHALL HAVE AN : Restrained 2' I (TAP AT 45 ANGLE ) PER SPECIFICATION SECTIdN GS-10, Tapped Plug Saddle required. on DOGHOUSE MANiOLE DETAL END CONNE TOP CONNECTION 4" P,V,C, only Nrs CTION D Water Service Tubing Saddle shall have double X, TEMPORARY BLOWOFf APD SAMPLE TAP E Driscopipe 5100 or stainless steel straps NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX N0. 408 wi•~h epoxy coated S Endot/Yardley Blue Jet, ductile iron body, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene - Water Main ater Main NOTES 1, WATER MAINS TD BE DN NORTH or EAST SIDE OF R.D.W„ APPROX. 4 FT, BACK OF CURB CH.ORNATION TA1P UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY CITY ENGINEER, NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX N0. M :R INDEX N0. 408 2. SERVICE CONNECTIONS TD BE 2 FT, FROM SIDE LDT LINE ON EITHER SIDE OF LOT (SEE SHEET ND. 3). THESE SERVICES TO BE CDNSISTANT WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION, DRIVEWAYS THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS SHALL NDT BE BUILT OVER METERS, - 3, ALL LINES SHALL BE CHLORINATED and PRESSURE TESTED (TEST FOR ONE HOUR @ 150 P~,I,) 1, BEND -INLET AND OUTLET UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT, AFTER SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION Dr" THE 2, TEE -OUTLET BRANCH TESTING and CHLORINATION, THE PRESSURE SHALL REMAIN ON THE SYSTEM AT ALL TIMES, 3, OFFSETS -INLET AND OUTLET - 4, TEN FT, SEPARATION REQUIRED BETWEEN PARALLEL WATER & SANITARY SEWER LINES. 4. CAPS 5, SADDLE IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO 4' PVC MAINS. SADDLE IS 5. PLUGS REQUIRED FOR 2' SERVICE CONNECTIONS TD 6' and LARGER PVC MAINS, LARGEST SERVICE 6. LAST TWO(2) JOINTS ON A DEAD END RUN (r11n, 36') CONNECTION TD A 4' MAIN IS 1 1/2' and LARGEST TO ANY MAIN IS 2'. 7, LAST TWO(2) JOINTS ON A HYDRANT RUNOUT (r11n. 36') 6. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN SERVICE TAPS TO BE NOT LESS THAN 36', L egalug Restrainer (Typ,) Cleanout Plug Threaded Cor oration Sto Curb Stop P P N MUELLER H15008 m c or a roved e ual MUELLER H14350 with c pp q Lock Win and Adjustable o a s (Ta at 45° An le) g Valve Box ~ p g Cor1 ression inlet or ~ p o o Concrete Pad 4' approved equal ~ ~ ~ Thick x 1'-6' Sq. Saddle if Required Ebba 1500 Series (Typ,) ~ ~ See Note 5 i0 v When Valve Occurs I. i0 v 6' or 8'- 1/8 Bend-- Water Service Tubing = In Roadwa ~ L MINIMUM LENGTH TO BE y, set Base I ~ o Drlscopipe 5100 or Endo~i;/Yardley RESTRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft,) on 10-Cor~rlon Brick, ~ ~ s ~ o s S ddle shall have double ~X Blue Jet, SDR 9, 3408 Polyethylene n. a n. Plug ~ NOM. ELBOWS (deg,) a stainless steel straps PIPE vALVE A (See Note) with epoxy coated SIZE 11,25 22,50 45 9o TEES NOTES THRUST RESTRAINT AT FITTINGS AND - ductile iron bod , Water Main 4 3 12 g VALVES SHALL BE BY USE OF EBBA IRON Y 5 8 MEGALUG RESTRAINERS. THRUST RESTRAINT 6 4 6 to i5 li BETWEEN PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE BY EBBA - ~ ~ ~ Sewer Main 8 4 7 13 20 i4 IRON SERIES 1500 RESTRAINERS,-Water Main Ater Main NUTE~ Cleanout plug to be WATER TAN SERVK~E CONFECTION DETA9. 10 5 9 15 25 !B Mer_h. Joint Valve ng Joint U,S, Foundry 7621 CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX N0. 401 12 6 10 17 29 21 Restl^aining Joint NTS or equal, PVC PPE RE3IRANT TYPICAL VALVE SETTNG CROSS-SECTION NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX N0. 403 NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDE;K N0. 40 SON STAPDARD CLEAN OUT DETAL (SANTARY) 2 402 NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX N0. 304 0 •N N THE FOLLOWING JOINTS MUST BE RESTRAINED IN ALL APPLICATIONS C L 1, BEND -INLET AND OUTLET a 2, TEE -OUTLET BRANCH 3, OFFSETS -INLET AND OUTLET 3 4, CAPS 5, PLUGS 6, LAST TWO(2) JOINTS ON A DEAD END RUN (rein, 36'> ' 0 t 7, LAST TWO(2) JOINTS ON A HYDRANT RUNOUT (Min, 36`) 3 L Thrust Restraint (Typ,) Q --Fire Hydrant Asserlbl v N U Connecting Piece w/integrally Y (TypJ 7 0 cast Mech,- Joint Gland on 18 Min. , Q one End-D,I, Rotatable Mech, 24' Max, ' Distance Varies Joint Gland on ether End, Length Varies ~ F.G,E, .e Varies Valve Box 0 i ~ II ~ (See Note 1) ~ _ N N 3 Restraining Gasket (Typ,> ~ --ti~9~` i L =MINIMUM LENGTH TD BE Valve and Hydrant Tee ' ~ Ecli se No, 85-B ~ ES ~ c R TRAINED ON EACH SIDE OF FITTING (ft.) w/D,I, Rotatable Mech, Joint Blow Uff Assy, ® Mech, Joint Gland on Plain End Branch, Valve Including Lockable ~'Y'°•rv~- ~ Cast Iron Box i ~ E I ' Mech. Joint Valve ! ' N NOM. ELBOWS (deg.) ~ N 2' Brass m PIPE VALVE NDTE~ THRUST RESTRAINT DN SLIPJDINT DUCTILE IRON PIPE N a SIZE 11.25 22,50 45 90 TEES SHALL BE U,S. PIPE FIELD LOCK GASKETS FOR TYTON JOINT ONLY APPRUVED 4 3 5 8 12 9 PIPE or AMERICAN FAST-GRIP GASKETS FOR AMERICAN 6 4 6 10 15 li FASTITE PIPE, THRUST RESTRAINT ON DUCTILE IRON FITTINGS Kennedy Guardian No. K-81A ~ ~ o a 4 7 13 20 14 SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE USE DF MEGALUG RETAINERS NOTES Muller Centurion No, A-423 Water Main ~ ~ i N 10 5 9 15 25 le AND MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS. 1, On Hydrants Requiring Runout Water Main , ® 12 s 10 17 29 21 Last Two Joints Must Be Restrained U.S. Pipe Metropolitan 2' Brass i 0 16 6 13 26 63 ~o Per Detail 403 (2 of 2), i ' O N~TES~ M 1, Steamer Connection to Fare Street, Restraining Joint (Typ,) N Y Greet, ° DUC PPE RE3TRANT ' Y11, 2, All Fire H drants to have 5 1/4" V , NTS Y alve ' J4" Valve Seat, 90° e NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX N0. 403 3, Fire Hydrants Shall be Placed at Street at Street Corners ~ ~•,t o or in the R.D.W, Adjacent to Side Lot Li 0 Side Lot Lines Whenever Possible, Restainer Plu , rJt, y Per Detail Nog 403 BLOWOFF DETAL ~ t,;, l~ ~ N~ TYPICAL FFiE HYDRANT A; CITY OF CLEARWATER INDEX N0. 404 1` ~~~`~~~®o',~~,~~ I , c IYDRANT ASSEluBLY NTS - ~ N NTS CITY OF CLEARWATER IN[ • C :LEARWATER INDEX NO. 402; 0 DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY PREPARED FOR: SHEET DESCRIPTION: a CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE 'TION: 'ND. ° JWD INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED o DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS 99'--203; , INC. 51, AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS GWI INVESTMENTS, INC. Ac JMS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES EPN122 o CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. 2510 PROSPECT ROAD F.B. & PG. 6 N SHT. o OC T030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 TAMPA, Florida 33629 : (727) 849-7588 Fax. (727) 848-3648 t UTILITY DETAILS N O.C. TEL (813) 258-5240 FAX (813) 258-5241 DATEt G 2 ' EM E.B. No. 7421 Y NO. DATE REVISIONS ABPYD 03!15104 6 DF _ . hQQ: _ _ r . ti'.R~'ry1:~: •_Y _ ...yJ _ • - I N~ _ - i~ _ - i~~ - - - _ 1.~ - - - . . . - _ - - ~~~9 ~ • - _ l-- - - _ l~ _ _ - - - - ,~1 _ - / 11 TRIFSA laM ~ I~: . _ ~ I ~ - - 1452 CARROLL DRIVE 59 PLUMBAGO ~ / / DACTYL~ID ; ' 1;;. ~ • AURICULATA ~ - - - - - - ATLANTA, GA 3031 B - ~ ~ ~ ~ - 82 TRIPSAC ~2-TRIp~gACUM l ~ ~ J ~ - ~ - _ (404) 352-2240 _ DPLA@DPLAMAIL.COM ®DACTYLOIDES ACTYLI~IDES ~ ~ - - ~ 29-VIBURNUM ~ _ - - I~ ~ ~ ODORATISSIMUM _ / ~ ~ 11-URIOPE SPICATA / _ \ ~ ~ + + SILVER DRAGON / / 22-TRIPSACUM ~ DACTYLOIDES `S 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 10-RAPH 0 101-VIBURNUM - - _ 1~K ~'~C ODORATISSIMUM _ O~ s INDI A ~ l t ~ ~ / , ~ ~ o 11 PHIOLEPIS - I DICA . - ~ p 9`=RAPHIOLEPIS 6- MANDA INDICA FOUA 10-RAPHIO 0 0 INDICA 1 t 5-TRIPSACU DACTYLOIDE 2Q- I PE SPIC/{TA j V! 7-VIBURNU SIL DRAGON 11 PHIOLEPIS ODORATISSI 19-ALPINI I DICA 15-VI UR SANDE 1Q-URIO PICgTA _ - Q ~ - B RNUM ODORA S 9-VIBURNUM SILVER GON TISSIMUM ODORATISSIMU E 1 _ 0 9 RAPHIOLE IS 9-RAPHIOLEPIS ~ 8 A S O A INDICA INDICA IN 6-VIBU N M ~ ' r DACTYLIQID~ I:. LL ~ ~ ~ - 88-L~RIOP SPI T ODORATI SI UM ® 2Q U TOPE SPIC TA SILVE D G N ~2-TR11 ACUM 1 ~I IL R DRAGO 11 PHIOLEPIS ACT111lIDES ~ ~ • • fi' ~ V ~ 0 - ~ 29-VIBURNUM (JJ L!. I DICA ODO B RNUM ~ ODORATISSIMUM Z W 6- MANDA SSIMUM FOUA R~' 24-P IL D N RON s. Q ~ ~ ~ a 101-VIBURNU ~ ~ Z NxA up 9-VIBU U 10-RAPH OL ODORATISSIMU ~ - 113-URI P S OD 11 SI UM 9 RAPHIOLEPIS 'SILVER D GONATA INDIA W d H ~ Q t. INDICA f ` 11 PHIOLEPIS I DICA -ALPINIA ``~.~B,=:LiRIDP,P~• P ~AXA•' Was - B RNUM ::1:01=LIRIO!'~:•$P1GATA~ - ~ TISSIMUM 'SILVER; 9E~AGOt~`.. , Z C~ ::~stL~R: DE~i1G0~}~:`: x ~ ~ o ~ ~ ; W 5 RA 0 PIS o 13= U p IN I 9-VI U NU ODO 11 IM M I 5-P LO E D N s. s. N Q ODO SI M ~XA AD ~ 9-RAPHIOLEPIS 8 5-PH LO N s. INDICA"; I R .25- AN 2~ 24-RAPHIOLEPIS RETENTION AREA LANDSCAPE PLAN INDICA ON E SIS _ . r,;•' 7-RAPHIOLEPIS - - - SCALE: 1 ".20' - INDICA - M ,~ti 4- ANNUAL ` COLOR 4-PH,ILODEND~tON s. ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ XANADU ~ i~ (TYP.) Plant list • SIGHT TRIANGLE Duantity Key Sdanlfic Name Common Name SpaGrg Size Comments I Trees i , POOL ~ ~ B A Cocosnucifera CoconutPlam As Shown 10'C.T. Matdredspedmen SIGHT TRIANGLE ® 7 B *+Ilexcassine Dahoon Halty As shown 8'-10' HT., 5 sp. (T-2112° cal.) Dense well branched % This drawing, as an instrument of service, is ANNUAL K e c Judpems sdidcola soiMem Red coder As shown s'a' Hr. (r-z 12"cat) Dense, wdl formed and shall remain the property of the COLOR - Architects and shall not be reproduced, 12 D +Kadreuteda elegans Gdden Shower Tree As Shown 10'-12' Hr. (212" 3" cal J Dense, well formed head published or used in any way without the 7-RAPHIOLEPIS" a5 E ++ugustrumjaponica tree Form uguslrum As srxxm 11r-17 Hr. (3"s v2" cd.) Danse, wdl brendred permission of the Architect. INDICA ~ ~ W 25- ' N AN MO SIS 24-RAPHIOLEPIS 20 F +Magnolia grarxfificra UtOe Gem Magndia As Shown 17-14' fir. (4"~ 12"cal.) Dense, wdl branched, belarrx~i head INDICA ~ tittle Gem' JOB NUMBER 8- ODOIB R U 5-PHILOD N o s I - T M XAN U 4 G ^++Myrica cerifera Wax Mydle As Strown 6'~' HT. (112" 2"cal.) Dense, wdl branced, balanced head 0 14- 5-PHILOD • ID 0 s. RAPH 0 PIS MON E IS ~ ~ ; U ® 15 H 'Pi~usElliolGi Slash Pine As Shown 8',10'-12'HTs.(2"-211Tcal.) 33%ed~aize 2404.1 16- B RN ODO IM 6 - NT A 17 J Podocarpus madophyl lus Japanese Yew As Stxnvn 4'b' Hr. Dense, well branched, balanced head . r. , r ~ ..,~.M N ENSIS t' 7 GALPHEMIA.; ® 5 K •++quercus virginiara Uve Oak As SMwn 10'-17 HT. (3"31Y7' cal.) Well branched, un'rfonn sbucbae DRAWN BY: GRACIUS " 1 ® 18 K •++quercusvirginiana Live Oak As Shown 141SHT.(4^-012"cal.) Specimen quality, well branched CHECKED BY: 9-RAPHIOLE - 3 BURNUM INDICA ` DO TISSIMUM 37 L ++Washingtaniarobuste Washington Palm As Shawn BCIearTnmk,17-14'OA Full, dense head,matdiedspedmerx DATE OF FIRST ISSUE: ? 6- URNUM r _ OD 11SSIMUM 19-P}IILODE s 12 M •++Lagerstrcemia Irxfip Crape MyNe As shaven 8-1fY HT. (7~ z 12"cal.) Denae, wdl branchaa MARCH 22, 2004 11 HIOLEPIS XANADU ~~°;J • 12-VIB ' 9 RAPHIOLEPIS I DICA - Op 0 INDICA 23-VIBU M _ 23-P IL DENpRON s. 12 N Saul palme0o Sabel Palm As Shown 8'-10'-12' C.T. 33%cech size REVISIONS ODORATI S UM ~ ~ ~ ADU -GALPHEMIA 1B P Taxodium disfichum Bald Cypress As Shown 6-10' HT. (2"-212" cd J Dense, low branched 55-VIBURNUM GRACILIS 0 3 VIBURNUM ODORATISSIMUM a R Tibouchirragmnwosa PurpeGloryTree Assham e'-to'Hi.(2"-z12•cal.) Dense,wellbranched,balancedhead NO. DATE gy D RATISSIMUM 0 ~ 24 S Ulmus parrifolia'Orake' Evergreen Elm As Shown 12'-14' HT. (3"~ 12"cal.) Dense, wdl balanced head 6- DA ~ 14-VI RUM FOLIA ODORA IS IMUM ;y` S~~ 1 5-11-04 CGC 19-RAPH 0 EPIS .:1:' 11 I pHCALEPIS INDIA 12-PJiI p ® 33 Allamandaneritolia BushAllamanda 30"o.c. 3gal. Dense,compad ® ' _ 23-PHILODE ~0 .'`14- I D D • 94 AlpiniasaMerae Variegated Ginger 36"o.c. 3gal. Danse,wdlformed SELLOU EN RON 9-RAPHIOLEPIS E LOUM `yl INDICA 2j- IRI PE SPIC9TA 69 Galphemiagracilis Thryallis 3G'o.c. 3gal. Dansecompadfonnandfdiage A1;i . SI DRAGON r 1 ~~-RAP 10 PIS 6- B ~ '1~IN C RNUM 8-VI RUM 116 Ilex crenta'Helled" Helleri Holty 30" o.c. 3 gal. Dense camped form end idiage D 11SSIMUM - _ ODORA S I U 19-PJiILODE ON s ^J~s;.~`-r M M 72 ++philodendron sdloum Philodendron 35' o.c. 3 gal. Dense camped form and foliage 91 HIOLEPIS ' I DICA XANAD <<k~x• ~ Rz,.;°Fs;_;u., 184 Philodendron s.'xanadu' Xanadu 30" o.a 3 gal. Dense, wdl formed 22-VIBU N M~ ~ ~4?>~~`~ ='"4 -'~L~/~~ 7 GALPHEMIA - 89 Plumbagoauriculata Plumbago 36"o.c. 3gd. Dense,compad ~'w ODORATI SI UM., i GRACILIS ~~~A~f?VA~: . 3 BU NUM ® 64B +Raphidepis indice Indian HawOrome 30" o.c. 3 gal. Dense, camped _ _ ~.~L;~~. DO TISSIMUM r4%°~_ ,.9-PIjILO N JtON s. 'Gard 18 T Rhapisexcdsa Lady Palm As Shown 5gal. Densecanpadfonnandfdiage 9-RAPHIOLEPIS ~'i: XAN D 6- L DA -mss:>~x1:, ® 622 +Vibumumodoro05simum SweetYbumum 36"o.c. 3gal. Densecempadfonnandtdiage INDICA FOLIA 0 22- HI N ~ / `'S Groundcov~nes 11 HIOLEPIS S '_`%~••^~''"gin I DICA ~ .°"'y `~?1'> vw ^zy> j- R PE SPICRTA SI VE DRAGON 12 U Bougainvillea spp. Bcugainvillea As Shown 3 gal. Provide 3-0 canes min. 13-PHI 0 ENDRON ~ , ~ ~ 0 14 CannairMiq Variegated Cannalilly 3lY'o.c. 3gd. Dense,wdifarmed S L UM 12-RAPH PIS 206 Lantana Monlevidensis Lantana 24" o.c 1 gal. Well Formed INDIA 0 + 12-TRIPSACUM ~ 7raD Uriopespicata Liriape 1To.c. 1gal. Dense, full DACTYLOIDES 23-VIBURNUM 'Silverdragon' 40 Pdysgchum aaos0chddes Christmas Fem 30" o.c. 1 gal. Dense, well farmed ~j. ODORATISSIMUM I 349 Trachelospemlumasiatlcum AslanJasmine 18"o.c. tgal. Danse,wdiformed ' SHEET TITLE 8-URIOPE SPICAjA ~ 'SILVER DRAGON ~ 10-RAP 10 ® 371 ++Tdpsaden dadytoides Fakahatchee Grass 36" o.c. 3 gal. Dense, tdl IN IC 19-RAPHIOLEPIS ~ INDICA ~ 58 s.f. Annual Color LANDSCAPE PLAN ~ ~ ~ + + + i ® 476s.f. St.AugusOneSod I I. ' 349-TRACHELOSPERMUM 'Native Florida plant material as defined by Chapter 13, Section 162, Schedule C o<the City of Tampa Code + Moderatety drought tddanl as define by Behodfs Reference Gdde to Florida Landscape Plods , ASIATICUM 150-TRIPSACUM 43-TRIPSACUM 11-VIBURNUM M Highly drought tderam as defined by Belrocks Reference Guide to Florida Landscepe PIaMs ~ i` DACTYLOIDES 34-VIBURNUM DACTYLOIDES ODORATISSIMUM , ODORATiSSIMUM , , r; . 0' 10' 20' 40' NORTH ` SCALE 1"=20' I I I I Q®° I RETENTION ioN ~ ~ II ~I I I I 1 . I I I I I I I I I ~~Q I I I I I I I I ~ i I I I I' I I I II I I I I I I I ~ I PERIMETER FENCE I AND GATE I I I I I I SEE DETAIL I I I I I MASONRY I B PERIMETER WALL ~ LD-1 I I I Y " SEE DETAIL~1:,~.., I s ' ~ ~ I i i 1452 CARROLL DRIVE J%w x ~A ~ I I ATLANTA, GA 30318 Ki q+ ,d,. ~ I ~ I I ~j j! (404) 352-2240 I I i i DPLA@DPLAMAIL.COM _ _ o~ - I I I I I I I I I . GEO-MAT MATERIAL I I ,~'',1, GEO-MAT MATERIAL 0 _ ~''i I I ` ~ ~ . ~'a ar ' ( I RETENTION ~ - - - s I f ~ a. f~,~.; ,I `S , 0 . I ~ ~ ~~qh+~„„_.,,,,, ®0 0 m I I ~ ~ Ii it ® IoW., 0 0 I I 0 ® I I = J I I W j PERIMETER FENCE j Z W I AND GATE I Q D ~J I SEE DETAIL I I B I ~ ~ I I ~ LD-1 t O ~ ~ 0 ® I I ~ II II ~ 1~_~~r LL ~ ~ SETBACK ~ pC v 0 I W F N tL - - ~ Z W GEO-MAT I ~ ~ W ~ a MATERIAL _ _ ~ _ > 0 ~I ® Q Q z Q ~ ~ a ~ J a _ n FOUNTAIN SEE DETAIL E Wv a ~S LD-1 ~ Z Z C~ _ \ ~ ~ - o p ®p ~ W ~ 0~ WALL FOUN AI ~ ~ SEE DET L D ~ ~ a ~ LD-2 RETENTION AREA LAYOUT PLAN Q ~ - - SCALE: 1 ".20' ~ I I I M I r-- I I ~ I i _ I I I 11 a I I I ~ I I I - POOL ~ ~ I I I This drawing, as an instrument of service, is J I and shall remain the property of the I i y~ ~ ~ I I I Architects and shall not be reproduced, f5 ' - II I published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. W 1 I ~ I i I - JOB NUMBER 2404.1 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE OF FIRST ISSUE: MARCH 22, 2004 REVISIONS FOUNTAIN N0. DATE BY .SEE DETAIL 0 E ® 1 5-11-04 CGC LD-1 0 I BENCH BBO (TYP.) (TYP.) T ~I i PERIMETER FENCE AND GATE 0 SEE DETAIL 0~ B LD-1 MASONRY PERIMETER WALL SHEET TITLE SEE DETAIL _ C ~ LAYOUT PLAN LD-1 ~0 O~ I I ~L.C ` ` ~ 10' 20' 40' NORTH SCALE 1"=20' STUGGO #2 STUGGO #I STUGGO STVGGO #I (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) (5HERWIN WILLIAM5 5W6387) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388 (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6387 I TERRA GOTTA GLAY TILES MID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF DENTIL (SffERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) PL. HT. TRIM (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) r ' SIiUTTER r - (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W64g3) o it I I' I' i AWNING 3/F F.F1. I (BLACK GANYAS) a . r ' i ~ r .I I. I I; I 5'IU000 #2 - _ - - - r i I: (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) 0 i I MOLDING (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5WT006) 2/F F.FL. I I ~ r ROUND COLUMN ~ PEDIMENT _ - - - - - r (5HERWIN WILLIAM5 5W100b) 0 I/F F.FI. _ I 0 ~0 ELEV. 37.78' at BLDG. TYPE - I rth 51de ELEV. 3728' at BLDG. IYPE - I (south 51de) STUCCO #3 (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388D) UNIT B UNIT A UNIT B UNIT B ,KNIT B UNIT B FRONT ~ L~V~T ION 51D~ ~LEV~TION AWNIN6 (BLACK CANVAS) STUCCO #2 STUCCO #I STUCCO # # 2 STUCCO I (SHERWIN iyILLIAM5 5W6388) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6387) (ShIERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388 (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6387) TERRA GOTTA CLAY TILES MID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF DENTIL (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W'l006) PL. HT. TRIM I _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5WT006) I I I ~ I I SHUTTER (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6Q~3) r I ~ ~ I I I o I I I I II I I I ~ i I 3/F F.F1. I I - ---------I ---I - ~r - - ~ ~ r ~ ~ 'I I II I I I' I STiJGGO #2 (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) I o I I I - I I I MOLDING I I 2/F F.F1. I (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W70061 I I I . I _ ...............I..............................._.............................................................................................................t......................._........................................................ __............................................i . r ~ ~ 0 ROUND COLUMN ~ PEDIMENT - ~ 0 (SHERyVIN WILLIAMS 5WT006) ~00 ~C~~ 0 U~~ . I ~ ~ 0 /F F.F1. ~ ~ ~ D O D ~ D ClC--~.. . . Q D 0..~ Q ELEV. 37.78' at BLDG.IYPE - I r 0 ~ .0 (No th Ide ~ ELEY. 3728' at BLDG. TYPE - I (south Ide) GARAGE DODR STUCCO #3 (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W1006) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388D) UNIT A UNIT B UNIT B UNIT B UNIT B UNIT A R~>~R ~ ~V L ATIO N 51D~ ELEVATION 11 ; watlons ~-~~f:,~. Ames ED I ARCHITE CTURE INC. 3731 Bria ark Dr Suite 300 ~ , GWI Investments _ Houston, TX 77042-5296 Phone: 713 789-0395 04017 ~ ) www.EDIarchitecture.com c itecture, Inc. ~ ~:y 1/l6" = l'•0" (11X17) . o Cle TExA o arwater Florid S CALIFORNIA NEW YORK ~ a ~ 1 /8" ~ 1.,0.. 24X36) COPYRIGHT ©2004 EDI ARCHITECTURE INC. ALL RIGHTS RE SERVED I t-- - fi n nnn w ~-iay iz, zuuff a . STUGGD #2 STUGGO #I STUGGO #2 ST11GG0 #I (SfIERWIN WILLIAM5 5W6388) {SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6381) (SF~RWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6381 7) AWNING a (BLACK GANYAS) ~ i~s„ 5 ~ E a TERRA GOTTA CLAY TILES MID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF ~ . t; 2a ; ~ , ,~~::,,a~ k' _ i i ~S~ as y ~ s~, ~ SEA?. 1~~ i y~~ ~ ~ 9; ~ i (SH~WIN WILLIAMS 5WT006) ~ -X~: PL. HT. ~ s' DENTIL - (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW1006) ; jF- r , ,.n ~ , t=t' I~ ;a*`',3 : ~ SHUTTER r ~4, ~ ~ , , w ~w ~ ' ~ i ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6Q93) a;s„ ~ ~ d~E ~ ~ i , i l i ' ~ ~ ~i~~k ~ i Y.. ~ ~ ti : ~ ~ 1 ~ 5~ ~ a ~ i«...~««» ~ :;fir « ~q~~ 3/F F.F.L. fps £ ~ I i , 3,i~Y a~~,',; ~ STIIGGO _ _ x, s~. (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) m _ - ~ z~~ , _ ~ ~i ~ r r , i ~ I 'i ~ , _ _ 0 ~ ~ ~ II i i , ~ ~ , _ I ~ i i ' I_ , ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ MOLDIN6 S ?JF F.F.L. =~s ~ ~~~I (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5WT006) a i . - - - r i ~ _ ; r ~ r ~i ~ , i _ ( A ROUND COLUMN rE PEDIMENT 0 _ ~i 3 - (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SWT006) ~ r i I I/F F.FL. ~ ~ x ~ , F „ u _ , r ELEV. 37.03' at BLDG. TYPE - 2 I~ oa STUCCO (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) SIVNNV (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6388D) UNIT A-END UNIT G Ui!;t G UNIT G UNIT G UNIT A-END FRONT ELEVATID N STUGGO #1 STUGGO #I 5TUGG0 ~2 (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6381) SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6 ( 388) STUCCO #I (SF~RWIN WILLIAMS 5W6387) AWNING (BLACK CANVAS) ~ ~ TERRA GOTTA CLAY TILES MID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF TRIM (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) PL. HT. _ _ I DENTIL (SHERWINWILLIAMSSWT006) ~o ~ ~ i. ~ r - - - - - SHUTTER i (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W64g3) O ~ - I I ~ I' 3/F F.F.L. m r ~ I I ~ STUCCO #2 ~ I i p ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6388) 2/F F.FL. MOLDING (SHERY~IIN WILLIAMS 5WT006) ~ ROUND COLUMN 4 PEDIMENT r ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0~ 0 ~ STUGGO #3 ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW1006) ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388D 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~~~00 ~0 0000 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0~ I/F F.F1. ~ ~ ~ ~ 0000 DD O ~ D 0 0~ ~ CQ CD . C~~CI ~o 000 . ELEV. 31.03' at BLDG, TYPE - 2 GARAGE DOOR {SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W1006) 5TUGG0 #3 (SH~WIN WILLIAMS SW6388D) UNIT G-END UNIT G UNIT G UNIT G UNIT G UNIT A ' . r, c,~~c~ ~ ~ ~ 'r REAR ELEVATION ' r V ~ • • ~ s wagon ~ ~ ft,. A\ ? j' ~ ~ ~ omes EDI ARCHITECTURE INC. GWI Investments 3731 Bria ark Dr Suite _ rp 300 Hou - ston, TX 77042 5296 Phone: 713 789- ( ) 0395 04017 www.EDIarchitecture.com 1/16" = 1'-0" (11X17) Architecture, Inc. rwater Florrd Clea ' TE o o ~ a XAS CALIFORNIA NEWYORK 1 /8" = 1'-0" (24X36) COPYRIGHT ©2004 EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED _ Mav 1 ~ ~nn4 ..W~ . Lr~ irV.. Ce9 C°~1 s i _i it . SNGGD ~2 5TKG0 #I (SFiERWIN WILLIAhfS 5YV6388) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW63B"D AWNIN6 (BLACK CANVAS} ~ ~ I ~ TERRA GOTTA GLAY TILE5 TRIM (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 SW1006) ~ DENTIL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5WT006) ; SHUTTER (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 SWbgg3) 5TUGG0 #I _ (5HERWIN WILLIAM5 5W638'i} _ _ ~ STUCCO #2 ~ ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5W6388) MOLDING (5HERWIN WILLIAM5 5W1006) --i----- - r---------- ---r- - OOO OOOO OOOO OC ROUND COLUMN 3 PEDIMENT ~ 0 ~ ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5W1006) 00 0000 0 00 ~ ~ ~ 0 00 0000 0 0o a _ _ _ o~. ooo~~_ o 00 0 ~0~~ 6ARA6E DOOR (SHERWIN WILLIAh15 5W7006) STUCCO #3 (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5W6388D) L UNIT A-END UNIT G UNIT G-MID UNIT G-END UNIT G 51DE ELEVaTIDN AWNIN6 (BI.AGK CANVAS) s,,,cco (SHERWIN NULLIAMS 5N1698'i) I I TERRA GOTTA GLAY TILES TRIM (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5W7006) ~ DENTIL (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5W7006) 5TKG0 #2 (5FiERWIN WILLIMS ~Y(i888) SHUTTER (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 SWbgg3) succo ai ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a (SfffRWIN WILLIAMS SW69b7) ~ _ 51U000 #2 - - - - - _ _ _ _ ; . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (5HERWIN WILLIAM5 SW6388) I 5TJ000 %3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (SHB2WIN WILLIAMS SW6388DJ ~ MOLDING (SI~RWIN WILLIAM5 5W1006) ~ _ f ROUND COLUMN 3 PEDIMENT 000 0000 0000 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5W7006) 000 00 0 0000 0~~ 000 00 0 0000 ~ ~0 _ o00 0 o 00 0 0 0 0.0 . 6ARA6E DOOR (5F~RWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) STUCCO #3 (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388D) IMIT G UNIT G UNIT A-END UWT GMID UNIT G NIT G ~ UNIT A-END f i~ i,+f! SIDE ELEVATION r ~ .i ~ ~ s ~ ~ d Building Type - 2 Elevat asm~ne Way Townhome EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. evat~ons ~ c w,. omes 3731 Briarpazk Dr, Suite 300 GWI Investments Houston, TX 77042-5296 04017 Phone: (713)789-0395 www.EDIazchitecture.com Clearwater Florida 1/16" = 1'-0" (11X17) l~~___ ; 1 /8" = 1'-0" (24X36) Architechue, Inc. 'rEXAS> CALIFOtuv1A, NEwyoRK ~ -r COPYRIGHT D 2004 EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED t Idy 1 L, LVV`I' SNGGO #I STUGGO M2 STUGGO #I SNGGO #2 5NU.0 ~I (SF~RWIN WILLIAMS SW6381) (SFIERVUN WILLIAMS 5W6988) (SF~RWIN YULLIAMS 5W638'I) (5H6tWIN NULLIMIS 5YIi69B8) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SNK387) 8T) I TERRA GOTTA GLAY TILES ~ MIO-POINT OF MPJN ROOF DENTIL (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5WTOO6) TRIM (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W1OOb) _ r_ . _ _ SHUTTER ~ ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5Wbgg3) O I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?I ~ STUGGO #2 ~'s/F FFL._ . - (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) ; AWNING ~ ; . - - - - - - ' _ - ~ (BLACK CANVAS) - - 0 1 I I I ~ ~ ~ 21F FPL._ I ~ ~ STUCCO {SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) MOLDING (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5WTOO6) I _ . o ROUND COLUMN ~ PEDIMENT ~o ~ ~ ~ (SHERYVIN WILLIAMS 5W7OO6) 0000 o000 o000 o000 oo ~ 0 000 0000 0 00 0000 00 0000 0000 00 0 0000 00 ELEV. 36.49' at BLDG.'fYPE - B Ide 000 000 DD ~ I . o 0 0 ELEV. 3650' at BLDG. TYPE ' 6 (South ) 6ARP~6E DOOR 5TUGG0 #3 (SFIERY~UN WILLIAMS SW"1006) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388D) UNIT A-END . UNIT D UNIT D UNIT D UWT D UNIT D UNIT A-END FRONT ~L~YATION 51D~ ~L~V,~TION 5f0000 ~t2 STKGO gl SlUGGO M2 S70000 ~I SNGGO #2 TRIM (SHERYUN WILLIAMS SW6980) (5HERWIN WILLIAMS SW638?) (5FERWIN WILLIAMS SW6988) (5HERWIN WILLIAMS SW638?) (SF~RWIN WILLIAMS SW6388) g) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5Vr'1OO6) I TERRA GOTTA CLAY TILES AMID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF ~r - DENTIL (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5WTOO6) AWNING ~ (BLACK CANVAS) SM)TrER (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 SWbgg3) ~ ~ ~ ~ I I - ~ \ _ii 1 r i STUCCO #I I ~ ~ ~ ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SWb38'I) 'i ~ MOLDING ~ I (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W1OO6) o ~ ~ 2IF F.FL. I -r-----------rt-------------- --------------rt-------------I ROUND COLUMN (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W1OO6) I~ F.F1. I I I I I I I ELEV. 96.49' at BLDG. TYPE - 3 51de ELEV. 9658' ak BLW. TYPE - S (5oukh 51de) STUCCO ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6388D} , ~:/,,~i~~~lt UNIT A-END ~ UNIT D ~ UNIT D ~L UNIT D UNIT D UNIT D UNIT D I ' i.~, •rgtA 1~ REAR ELEVATION 51D~ ~LEV~TION ~L ~ f~ a ~ r 1~~~} a h ~3 y V ~ ~jf ae °;~1 Building Type - 3 Eleva Jasmine Way Townhome eva tons ,Y~-~.,~n ~~,~~a, comes EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. GWl Investments 3731 Briarpazk Dr, Suite 300 04017 Houston, TX 77042-5296 Phone: (713)789-0395 '':-i~ ~ 1/8" = 1'-0" (24X36) ~'~'~'•EDIarchitecture.com Clearwater. Florida ' TEXAS o CALIFORNIA o NEW YORK COPYRIGHT © 2004 EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED May 12 2004 a i STUGGO II2 5T1C.G0 #I 57U000 ~2 STUGGO ~I (5F~RWIN WILLIAMS SW6388) (SHERriIN YULLIAhti 5NK38'1) (SF~tWIN WILLIAMS SYY6388) (SfgRWIN WILLIAMS SYV698?) I TERRA GOTTA GLAY TILES MID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF -q DENTIL (SHERYVIN WILLIAMS SW7006) TRIM fl.. HT. (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) y _ SHUTTER ~ (5HERWIN WILLIAM5 5W6993) I I STUGGO #2 (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) ~ 3/~ FFL._ . AWNING ~ I I II (BLAGK GANVA5) i ~ ~ ( I MOLDING (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) I ~L- - _ ~ _ ~ i ROUND GOLUMN d PEDIMENT (5HERWIN WILLIAM5 5W7006) ~0 FI FV. 97.16' at BLD6. TYPE - 4 STUGGO #3 (SNERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388D) UNIT A-END 9NIT A UNIT B UIUT B ~L UNIT B UNIT A-END FRONT ELEVATION 51D~ ~L~V~TION 5'IU000 ~2 STUGGO %I 5TKG0 ~2 5'R~LCO ~I (SIffRIYIN WILLIAMS SW63H8) (SHERWIN NULLIAhS 5VV6301) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6388) (SFiERWIN WILLIAMS 5WFi38'f) I TERRA GOTTA GLAY TILES MID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF DENTIL ~ - (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) TRIM (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) - SMJr~ER - - - - (5HERWIN WILLIAM5 5W6993) i AWNING (BLAGK GANVAS) _~s/F F.FL. _ _ - STUGGO #2 r I I I I I ~ I ~I (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388) MOLDING ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) ~ 2/F F.FL. , ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ II _ r------- r--------- -----1 ------1 o00 0000 0000 0000 000 ROUND GOLUMN (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) 0 000 0000 00 0 000 00 ~ - o00 0000 00 0 0000 00 ~~FFL o00 ~ oo~o 000 0000 0~ ELEV. 9"1.16' at BLDG. TYPE - 4 6ARA6E DOOR STUGGO #3 (5HERViIN WILLIMS 5W1006) (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W6388D) UNIT A UNIT A-END UNIT B UNI7 B UNIT 9 UNIT A REAR ELEVATION 51D~ ELEVATION ' ~ s~ ~~~''~•i'';A`~ Building Type - 4 Elevat Jasmine Way Townhome evat~ons ~ ~ omen EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. GWllnvestments _ 3731 Briarpazk Dr, Suite 300 Houston, TX 77042-5296 04017 Phone: (713) 789-0395 1/16.. y 1.,0..11X17) ~ 1 /8 ~ 1 ~~0~~ (24X36) www.EDIazchitechue.com Clearwater Florida Architecture, Inc. ~gpS a CALIFOIWIA ~ NEW YORK ~ COPYRIGHT D 2004 EDI ARCHITECTURL+, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED . ' ~ ~ - Mav 12.2004 ' ~ ~ 1 S10000 ~I ' 5N000 #2 STUGGO #I SiUGGO ~2 I (SNERWIN WILLIAM5 5W698'I (5HERWIN WILLIAMS SY~6988) (SHERY7IN WILLIAMS 5YV638'U (SFERWIN WILLIAhS 5YV6308) TERRA GOTTA CLAY TILES I DENTIL (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW1OO6) MID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF TRIM (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7OO6) I SHUTTER ' I (SHERY~IIN WILLIAMS SWbag3) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ i (BLACK CANVAS) ~ AWNIx~ . ~Fi. { _ _ - - - - - - - - ~ ~ 1 ~I ~ ~ ~ STUCCO #2 ~ o II ~ ~ ~ I~ I I~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 5W6388) I I . - .,O , 0 e ~ -L ~ MOLDING (5HERWIN WILLIAMS 5WTOO6) p I ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ I/F F.FL. I ROUND COLUMN ~ PEDIMENT ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W7OO6) 96.50' at BLD6. TYPE - 5 STUGCA #3 (SNERWIN WILLIAMS SW6388D) UNIT A UNIT A-END UWT G UNIT G I UNIT AMID L UNIT G FRONT ELEVATION UNIT A 51D~ ~L~V~TION STKGO ~1 5N000 %I 570000 #2 STUGGO RI (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6388) (FiN~"UN WILLIAMS 5W69B7) I lSFgRWIN WILLIAMS 5YYr788) I (5HB2WIN WILLIAMS SN~638U TERRA GOTTA CLAY TILES I DENTIL (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5WTOO6) - ,~_MID-POINT OF MAIN ROOF I \ TRIM - ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W'fOO6) I - ~ - - _ PL _Hi• _ - - - - - SHUTTER I ~ I (SHERWIN WILLIAM5 SW6gg3) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ AWNING ' ~ (BLACK CANVAS) ............................................._i _ 51U000 ~2 (SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW6388) r ~I... _ ~ i, ~ i, (OSHERW~ IN WILLIAMS 5W7OO6) ~ L~ . i - ROUND COLUMN ~ PEDIMENT ~ ~ ~ (SHERWIN WILLIAMS 5W1OO6) o00 0000 0000 0000 0000 0 0 000 0000 0000 00 0 0000 0 - o00 0000 0000 00 0 00 0 ~L_ _ ~~oo 000 ~ o000 000 00 _ a ~ ELEV. 3658' ak BLDG. TfPE - 5 000 0 0 00 i o o STUCCO #3 6ARA6E DOOR (SHEW"lIN WILLIAMS 5W6388D) UNIT A-END (SFgRWIN WILLIAMS 5W7006) UNIT A-END :y , UNIT A UNIT G ~ UNIT AMID ~ UNIT G I UNIT G I. REAR ELEVATION 51D~ ~LE1lATI0N ~ ~ , ~~i ~ , al 0 1 @` • O e ~ ~ ~ .f . Building Type - 5 Elev ]asmine Way Townhom evat~ons - ,i.~ .homes • GWI Investments EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. 04017 3731 Briarpazk Dr, Suite 300 _ 1/16" = 1'-0" (11X17) Houston, TX 77042-5296 118" = 1'-0?' (24X36) Phone: (713)789-0395 www.EDIazchitecture.com Clearwater, Florida Architecture, Ina TEXAS ~ CALIFORNIA • NEW YORK ~ Ma 12 2004 y COPYRIGHT 0 2004 EDI ARCHITECTURE, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED s-i r~w.+ I (83) I I I I 16 - LIMITS OF I I I 'r 9 I TREE BARRICADE 2) I I I 1 I I (73) o~ `LINTEL WALL SYSTEM TO ACCOMODATE ~ I I " i ~ I 27» - TREE TO REMAIN i ~ ~ I ~ /i \ I I I i----------------_--- ~2Q I ~P~ I 84 8" ~ II I ( / I II Q° • \ ~ I I (69) 1 ~ i i (72) (70) I I LINTEL WALL SYSTEM TO ACCOMODATE g Q „ (~-8) ~ I 85 67 ) „0~ I I I I I~ ( ) ( ) u » - TREE TO REMAIN ~ 1 10 1 I I - - - _ 1 I I I I I I I ~ I LIMITS OF i 20 ~ - I ~ \ j j ~ TREE BARRICADE / " 1~ ~ 5 ~ i ~ ~ ~ I 1 \ 1 110) ~ ~ ~ (46) I I ? ~ / \ 65 ~ ~ II II 1452 CARROLL DRIVE - - - - - " \ 11„ 45 ~ N ) ATLANTA, GA 30318 I I (404) 352-2240 9 0 5 (50) \ DPLA@DPLAMAIL.COM ~ 15" (111 } " \ 1 N / I I 6 , (57) ~ ~ ~4 61 , I I I I I o i a 1 ® 43) ~ (56} s"1o" I I ,f RETENTION I ~ ~ II 1, J . ~ 12 ~ ~ o » II ' ®o ~ 41 13 0 0.. N 8 I , 1" „„40 18 0~~ 8 10 10 (62) i I W ~''rahuiiiru~°~'' I 58 (39) ( ) I I I I ~ ~ " I I m ~ 54 I; .I o " 6 " 5° 8" 5" " 2>' (38) (64 55 0 a I I 63 60 59 ( ) 52 11 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) " u (53) ~ ADE ; ; = w N 4 5 108) ~ " 0 DATE ~ ' Z c (106) ? ~I (109) a Z ~ ~ I ~ o W 4 z a 681 ~ (70) (48) I I LL ~ - ) 7" ( ~l 10"~7 1 ~ O ~ O - IY V ~ J 49) 1 ~ H W ~ ~ ~ (86) , o ~ I z ~ 0 10" „ 3 ® ( ) 81 (51) s )1 „ ( „ ~ ~ " - (35) ~(46) a a Z a J Q - F. • ~ 10 _ 66 - I 4 M I r-- I 50) ~ 11 4 ~ W V a ~ ~ I I I I II 1 I }~4 7., ~ Z w s o ~ I ~ 8„10„ 43) ~ ~ cn - I w „ POOL > RETENTION AREA LAYOUT PLAN ~ °C 18 0 28 1 I a y SCALE: 1 ".20' I ) I i 51 I I I i W I z .,r, r , „ 6 ~ 2" - I , . ~r~ - ~ " 5 11) "12 ,~r~ 8 88) - 9) " (7) 10 9 . " ( ) EXISTIN / ) - h EXISTING TREE INVENTORY i 0® ~ 1 4 ) NUMBER NUMBER COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION ACTION PALMS ~ 5 " ( ) 32 ~ ( ) 12 \ ) X13) , .m 1 LAUREL OAK 17"DIA 4 REMOVE I MITIGATE 74 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 OFF SITE I NIA 2 LIVE OAK 5"DIA 3 REMOVE 1 NO MITIGATION 75 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 OFF SITE /NIA (103) 19" 16" ~ m 3 LIVE OAK 7"DIA 3 REMOVE I NO MITIGATION 76 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 OFF SITE J NIA ®o ~ ''m 'r 4 LIVE OAK 5"DIA 3 REMOVE 1 NO MITIGATION 77 CA88AGE PALM 15' OAH 3 TRANSPLANT This drawing, as an instrument of service, is 5 LIVE OAK 6"DIA 3 REMOVE! NO MITIGATION 78 CA88AGE PALM t5' OAH 3 TRANSPLANT and shall remain the property of the 6" ~ ~ 105 6 LIVE OAK 8"DIA 3 REMOVE 1 MITIGATE 79 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT Architects and shall not be reproduced, (4) 4 ~ " 6„ .Y. ,~,r8 7 LIVE OAK 5"DIA 3 REMOVE! NO MITIGATION 80 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT Published or used in any way without the m ' ~~J , o ® " 90 F ~ ( ) 8 LIVE OAK 7"DIA 3 REMOVE! NO MITIGATION 81 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT permission of the Architect. 9 LIVE OAK 8"DIA 3 REMOVE /MITIGATE 82 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 OFF SITE / N!A 10 LIVE OAK 4"DIA 2 REMOVE /POOR QUALITY 83 CABBAGE PALM 20' OAH 3 OFF SITE !NIA (3) .r 91) t; ( J ~ ~ 12 ~ 11 LIVE OAK 8"DIA 3 REMOVE! MITIGATE 84 QUEEN PALM 20' OAH 3 OFF SITE !NIA JOB NUMBER 12 LIVE OAK 10"DIA 3 REMOVE J MITIGATE 85 QUEEN PALM 25' OAH 3 OFF SITE I NIA 2404.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ (92) 13 LAUREL OAK 8"DIA 3 REMOVE! MITIGATE 86 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT " ® 5 9 10" 14 LAUREL OAK 8"DIA 3 REMOVE /MITIGATE 87 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT 15 LAUREL OAK 19"DIA 4 REMOVE /MITIGATE 86 WASHINGTON PALM 40' OAH 3 TRANSPLANT ( ) ~ ~ „ ~ 16 LAUREL OAK 9"DIA 3 P.EMOVE I MITIGATE 89 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT DRAWN BY: 7 / 0 10 ~ 1 ( ) „ (29) 17 LIVE OAK 41"DIA 5 TO REMAIN 1 PROTECT 90 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT ~ 1 LIMITS OF \ ~ ~ 1 (15 18 LAUREL OAK 14"DIA 2 REMOVE /POOR QUALITY 91 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT CHECKED BY: 19 LIVE OAK 10"DIA 3 REMOVE I MITIGATE 92 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT DATE OF FIRST ISSUE: T EE BARRICADE '1 20 LIVE OAK 11"DIA 3 REMOVE! MITIGATE 93 WASHINGTON PALM 40' OAH 3 TRANSPLANT MARCH 22 2 ~ 1 2 o ~ ~ 93 21 LAUREL OAK 5",G' DIA 2 REMOVE J POOR QUALITY 94 CABBAGE PALM 8' OAH 3 OFF SITE I NlA , 004 22 CITRUS 10"DIA 2 REMOVE /POOR QUALITY 95 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 OFF SITE I NIA ® ~ ~ ~ 1 1 23 LAUREL OAK 14"DIA 3 REMOVE !MITIGATE 96 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 OFF SITE ! WA REVISIONS I " ` 0 45 m 24 LAUREL OAK 10"DIA 3 REMOVE !MITIGATE 97 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 OFF SITE I NIA ~ 1 I ~ I 25 NOT USED NOT USED 98 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT 26 LAUREL OAK 8", 6"DIA 1 REMOVE /POOR QUALITY 99 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT N0. DATE BY I ~ ~ 17 ~ 27 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 7"DIA INVASIVE REMOVE 1 NO MITIGATION 100 CABBAGE PALM 15' OAH 3 TRANSPLANT 1 ~ 28 LAUREL OAK 15"DIA 1 REMOVE I POOR QUALITY 101 CABBAGE PALM 15' OAH 3 TRANSPLANT 1 5-11-04 29 LIVE OAK 11", 6"DIA 3 REMOVE 1 MITIGATE 102 CABBAGE PALM 15' OP.H 3 TRANSPLANT o ~ ® 1 ~ 'I o m/ ~ m 30 LIVE OAK 10", 8" 3 REMOVE /MITIGATE 103 WASHINGTON PALM 30' OAH 3 TRANSPLANT ~ ? (2 14„ ~ / ~ „ 31 LAUREL OAK 5"DIA 3 REMOVE / NO MITIGATION 104 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT ? / (24 10 32 HOLLY SPP 8"DIA 4 REMOVE /MITIGATE _ 105 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT 33 LIVE OAK 19", 21", 23"DIA 2 REMOVE I POOR QUALITY 106 WASHINGTON PALM 30' OAH 3 TRANSPLANT (101) \ 5" 2 ~ (18 " \ ~ 34 CAMPHOR 8"DIA 2 REMOVE 1 POOR QUALITY 107 CABBAGE PALM MATURE 3 TRANSPLANT 1 ~ i " 35 LAUREL OAK 16"DIA 1 REMOVE! POOR QUALITY ®~ADDITIONAL TREES PER CITY ARBORIST 36 CAMPHOR 6", 6"DIA 1 REMOVE I POOR QUALITY m 108 LAUREL OAK 4"DIA 4 REMOVE / NO MITIGATION (23) 26 o „ 0®(1 37 LAUREL OAK 8"DIA 1 REMOVE /POOR QUALITY m 109 LAUREL OAK 5"DIA 4 REMOVE / NO MITIGATION " ® 4 38 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 12"DIA INVASIVE REMOVE I NO MITIGATION m 110 RED MAPLE 5"DIA 3 TO REMAIN !PROTECT 38 BRAZILIAN PEPPER B",10",10" INVASIVE REMOVE / NO MITIGATION ® 111 RED MAPLE 5"DIA 4 REMOVE / NO MITIGATION u 101(76) 102 u " I> q ( ) 8 ( ~ 16 18 40 LAUREL OAK 12"DIA 2 REMOVE I POOR QUALITY m 112 LIVE OAK 5"DIA 5 REMOVE ! NO MITIGATION ~ ,,107 ~ 4 ( ) • " 1(22) q 41 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 13"DIA INVASIVE REMOVE / NO MITIGATION ® 113 RED MAPLE 5"DIA 4 REMOVE / NO MITIGATION " 18 10 EXISTING TREE FULL CANOPY WIDTH 4 42 CAMPHOR 11", 8", 13"DIA 2 REMOVE /POOR QUALITY 43 LAUREL OAK 9"DIA 2 REMOVE J POOR QUALITY TOTAL CALIPER INCHES TO MITIGATE 256 CALIPER INCHES sEE PLAN (99 (74) t ~ 1 m q 44 CAMPHOR 7"DIA 2 REMOVE 1 NO MITIGATION (19 q ~ ~ a 45 CAMPHOR 12"DIA 2 REMOVE !POOR QUALITY 46 LAUREL OAK 7"DIA 0 REMOVE / NO MITIGATION TREE MITIGATION CHART 98 ~ ) q ~ " I 47 LAUREL OAK 12"DIA 2 REMOVE I POOR QUALITY r ~ 24" „ I 6 4 ~ ~ ~ _ 48 LIVE OAK 15", 15"DIA 2 REMOVE J POOR QUALITY PROPOSED TREES 49 LAUREL OAK 19" DIA 2 REMOVE J POOR QUALITY TREE SPECIE TREE KEY QUANT. CAL IN. TOTAL CAL. INS. - ~ o q 1 V ~ ; 1 GO Y 50 LAUREL OAK 18"DIA 2 REMOVE J POOR QUALITY Ma nolia .'Little Gem' F 20 4"-4112" 85" i . ~ 20 21 i ~ u ( ) ( ) m-' ) ~ ~ (97 12 51 LIVE OAK 3T' DIA 2 REMOVE J POOR QUALITY m Quercus vir iniana K 18 4"4112" 77" vV \ ,r F (95) _ ~ 96 12 ® F 52 LIVE OAK 6"DIA 3 REMOVE ! NO MITIGATION 53 LIVE OAK 5"DIA 3 REMOVE I NO MITIGATION `y \ ~ 1 m 54 LIVE OAK 6"DIA 3 REMOVE I NO MITIGATION ( 55 LIVE OAK 8"DIA 3 REMOVE /MITIGATE ® TOTAL QUALIFYING CALIPER INCHES OF REPLACEMENT 162" 56 LAUREL OAK 10",1T' DIA 2 REMOVE J POOR QUALITY SHEET TITLE _ EXISTNG TREE ' 57 SLASH PINE 17"DIA 3 REMOVEIMITIGATE TOTAL QUALIFYING CAL. INCHES TO BE REMOVED 256" TREE SURVEY r 2/3 CANOPY WIDTH NOTES: 58 CHERRY LAUREL 11"DIA 3 REMOVElMITIGATE MITIGATION 2X2 WOODEN POST ,'a; ~ m MAX. SPACING B' t. PROTECnVE BARRIER SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE FOR ! f 59 LIVE OAK 7"DIA 3 REMOVE! NO MITIGATION 60 LIVE OAK s" Dla 3 REMOVE /MITIGATE ® NET CALIPER INCHES TO MITIGATE TREE BANK 94 DBH & PRESERVATION • DURATON OF CONSTRUCnON ACnVITY. ~G ® F ~1 ~ 61 HOLLY SPP 5"DIA 4 REMOVE / NO MITIGATION _ 1X4 RAIL SECURED TO 2. MAINTAIN EXISTING GROUND COVER UNDISTURBED 62 LAUREL OAK 9"DIA 3 REMOVE I MITIGATE ® 94 DBH X 48.00 $4,512.00 f TOP OF 2X2 POST WITHIN BARRIER LIMITS. ® E 63 LIVE OAK 5"DIA 2 REMOVE !POOR QUALITY 64 LIVE OAK 6"DIA 3 REMOVE / NO MITIGATION KEY 'r:-~ ~ 3. NO CONSTUCnON MATERIALS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS ~i E MATERIALS SHALL BE STORE WITHIN TREE BARRIER. I E 65 LIVE OAK 10"DIA 3 REMOVE 1 MITIGATE l ~ AREA WITHIN BARRIER SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. f 66 LIVE OAK 9"DIA 3 REMOVE! MITIGATE rr 67 LIVE OAK 2T'DIA 1 REMOVEIPOORQUALITY 6 TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) ~ t f 68 CAMPHOR 7"DIA 2 REMOVE /POOR QUALITY . 7 r, ~ o ao rnAeouno ~rn~ nin Z n[C CITC / Al/n ' i ` V.7 VlllYIrIIVI\ IV Ulll ! VII VIIL I ~ 70 CAMPHOR 7" DIA 2 OFF SITE / WA I m i EXISTING GRADE 71 LAUREL OAK 9" DIA 1 REMOVE! POOR QUALITY . J) 'V' 72 LIVE OAK 2T' DIA 3 OFF SITE / WA p 73 LIVE OAK 2T' DIA 3 OFF SITE 1 WA a sr- 0' 10' 20' 40' NORTH (MAX.) n &TREE BARRICADE ' NTS SCALE 1"=20' • . PRECAST CONCRETE WALL CAP , d~ 12 - . • Be.9 PRECAST CONCRETE CAP FINISH GRADE POOL DECK 4"X4" DECORATIVE TILE , 4" CONCRETE BASE g" (TO BE SELECTED) CONCRETE GUNITE FOUNTAIN WALL ROUGH STUCCO FINISH COMPACTED SUBGRADE WITH BLA K MARCITE FINISH I N ~ EAB 100 BUBBLER HEAD AVAILABLE v, ,,a ®THE FOUNTAIN PEOPLE, INC, ~ ~ z -===11= "11 " I I I-III III III I 2 7X4 X1 4 PLATE WALL DESIGNED BY OTHERS a =III=III=_II -III=1I W/(2) 5/8" DIA. HOLES EACH W = _ ' ~=I I PRECAST CONC, WALL CAP 'S -III-III-III-III-III III-III-III >d•P ~ ~ _W -III-I II I. r ~~=III -I I- I =1 I =1 I -III ==1I 1=1I 'a'~~ WATER LEVEL ~~a~ 7 ,'i N W Q a ) N ~ 4 1 ':k~ W ~ _ ~ ~ H 2 . ' ! aG• . ' - - - - - - q W ' ~ SEMCO HURRICANE ANCHOR COMPACTED SUBGRADE j I I - _ - 1452 CARROLL DRIVE _ = ATLANTA, GA 30318 - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = TYPE HCPR 20GA, W 4 Bd I - I - - -I -III-I ~ , , ) ~ =1 i - , , f, NAILS ®RAFTER AND (4) 8d I ; _ - NAILS ®STRINGER STEEL CAP PLATE I REINFORCING PER POOL CONTRACTOR'S (404} 352-2240 ~ _ ROUGH STUCCO FNISH~ ' I = =1 ~ SHOP DRAWINGS DPLA@DPLAMAILCOM ~ -I -I ~ ELEVATION I COMPACTED SUBGRADE , ° a, ~ b ' . TO POOL EQUIPMENT n ~ e, , 4 COURTYARD FOUNTAIN SECTION • SECTION 4"X4" X 1 4" STEEL COLUMN / II " II E '~4 - LUMN 314 =1-0 ~ " / I I U T.S. CONC. FILLED W 9X9 X3 8 / (9 X3 8 LARGE PLANTER (TO BE SELECTED) t0 ~ ' ~ BASE PLATE W/(4) 3/4 DIA. WEDGE ANCHORS AND DIA. FROM FRAZIER'S ORNAMENTAL & ~ L 4 1/2°X6"X1/2" CAP PLATE ATE ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE, INC. ~ t.~ ~ ~.'y~ . , 1/4 WEEP HOLES DRILLED THROUGH THE SHELL WITHIN ' 6" OF THE TOP AND BOTTOM ' 3 POST WITH CAP AND ONE HOLE AT MID-HEIGHT 0 DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM ~ p. 6'-6° O.C, MAX. 4'-6" APPLY BITUMASTIC 12" ~ PANIC BAR WITH 2" RAIL SEALANT ON STEEL COLUMN BELOW GRADE STEEL BASE PLATE PRECAST CONCRETE CAP ~ N SELF-CLOSING Z W LATCH ~ BLOCK-OUT TO BE PACKED a ~ Z 'ED ROUGH STUCCO FINISH i ~ . ; ~ O W/GROUT AFTER COLUMN IS SET I IS SET ~ , ~ COMPACTED SUBGRADE ~ ZH ROUGH STUCCO FINISH CO FINISH ~4 REBAR 24" O.C., VERT. IN FILLED CMU CELL ~ ~ > 5 ® J ~ r, • all=1 I I = 11= I = I I- ~ oc 8" x 8" x 16" CMU WALL ~ = N I-III= I ~ I-III ~ V N J x ; I 'y.' • ~'.I~'~ ~ 18" SQUARE CONCRETE BASI CONCRETE BASE _ _ ~ ~I -III ~ ~ Z W ~ 3/4 PICKET o • ~iF" WITH 4 6W AND 3®12" TII AND #3®12" TIES ' ~ =_II1= III,I III III=1I I-1 a ~ ~ a 3/4 PICKET FINISH GRADE I-i _-I~ I- I-- ~ '';~;I~ 4- #5 CONT. IN CONCRETE FOOTING ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ) , 'FINISH GRADE I I _ -I ; I Q Q ~ Q . ~ ~ ,r: COMPACTED SUBGRADE ' ' ' J a 'v, , . ~ : , ' j O II 1T ~ ~f~~i, ° , Q I 2 RAIL r' ~ ` .'I'' , ~ ~ 'I' , E"' 1 Z 30" Z , ~ ~ , MASONRY 1NALL AND COLUMN SECTION ~ W „ ' CONCRETE FOOTING RETE FOOTING ~ 314"=1'-0" ~ a ' X 2'-0" X 12" CONC. FTG. I~'• • 1 3 4 LONG, AND 3 , , , , ;I• ,,I,, „ LONG, AND 3 #4 TRANSV, ~ , d ~ e, ' . I. I 10" DIA. IMITATION CORAL ROCK ~ I " d I .I Q COLUMN, TYP. ` o ~ I, I ' I I . This drawing, as an instrument of service, is N °a , and shall remain the property of the - Architects and shall not be reproduced, ~ ~ I la 111_1 ~-OBI .a LJ~ a ~d.~''a . FINISH GRADE 2X6 STRINGER published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. Q JOB NUMBER 1'-O" 4X12 BEAM (TYP.) 24041 CONCRETE FOOTING DRAWN BY. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP CHECKED BY: IMIT, CORAL ROCK FINISH PLAN S"X4" CONC, CAP W/ 1 #5 BAR 4 CO DATE OF FIRST ISSUE: MARCH 22, 2004 NTINUOUS (TYP) ~ 2 -9 2'-6° REVISIONS TYP TYP. 5'-0" O.C. 2'_0,1 ~Y,. 2'-Q" N0, DATE BY TYP. TYP 12'-O" O.C. 9" 2'-6" O.C. ROUGH STUCCO FINISH (2) SEMCO HURRICANE ANCHORS 1 5-11-04 CGC P TYP. 12" TYYPE HCPR 20GA, W/(4 8d NAILS@ 2X4 (TYP.) 'TY . nP) 2X4 TYP. RAFTER AND (4) 8d NAILS ®STRINGER P) ~ ( ) 1/ 3 6" 2X6 STRINGER R nll TRINGER 2X6 STRINGER L 3" 4X12 BEAM TYP BEAM (TYP.) 4X12 BEAM (TYP.) ( I ~ PROGRESS LIGHTING PROGRESS LIGHTING O 11 UP/D WN LIGHT 10 DIA, IMITATION 41TATION UP/DOWN LIGHT P5675-20 WITH CORAL ROCK ;K #P5675-20 WITH 7 C PS 99 TOP LENS OVER N COLUMN, TYP Yp iv P8799 TOP LENS 5 REBAR 24" O.C. i I COVER, TYP. # ~ FINISH GRADE r 10" DIA. IMITATION 8" KNOCKOUT B OC L K W/ (1) #5 BAR ELECTRICAL CONDUIT CORAL ROCK CONTINUOUS-GROUT SOLID ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, COLUMN, TYP TYP. SHEET TITLE a - I I =11=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 _ _ _ I I I- I - I I-I I- ~ • - - I- DETAILS - - _ _ - ~ ~ ~ _ ' ° _ _ 5 DOWELS AT 24 0. SIDE ELEVATION ~Q FRONT ELEVATION ~ ' ' -III-III-III-III-III III-I I ' . I I ~ !a •~a' _ _ ~ III a - - - - - - - - - ~ I, , I ~ t a', I - I I a;. ' i= _ _ _ I _ _ - _ CONCRETE FOOTING W/ 3-~5 ' d ~ I, , , P I I I. dl I ';'.I -III-III-III-I i I . I I I_ I _ - - - a .1 I ~ . I , I I III III I III II -I = _ = 3 ,1= - - _ REBARS, CONTINUOUS ' M I v l I a. l .f- ~ ~-III-I ~ i - - - i- I , e I I , ! -III-III-III- II I• da ''I , I I v I i°,p.a ..I ' ~ ' ' =III=III- #5 REBAR 24" O.C. ~ .I I ' ' I e. COMPACTED BACKFILL 21-811 NOTE: } um I ALL WOOD MEMBERS SHALL BE ROUGH SAWN SELECT GRADE CEDAR. ~o MASONRY PERIMETER WALL SECTION ~ WOOD ARBOR DETAILS TREAT ALL WOOD MEMBERS WITH A SEMI-TRANSPARENT OIL-BASED STAIN. (COLOR TO BE SELECTED) Q®~ PLANT SO THAT ROOTBALL IS LEVEL WITH FINISHED GRADE ~~I FOR SABAL PALMS THIN BRANCHES AND FOLIAGE ~ AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ~l// PRUNE AND TIE FRONDS TOG " ~ 1 ETHER ARCHITECT. NEVER CUT TERMINAL LEADER MIN. 3 EUCALYPTUS MULCH OR APPROVED ~ WITH BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL ` EQUAL SUBJECT TO LA APPROVAL DO NOT i1P FRONDS m, 2-PLY REINFORCED RUBBER OR PLASTIC HOSE-MIN. 3/4 DIA. , 5 LAYERS OF BURLAP ~ 5-2" X 4" X 10" WOOD BATTENS LOCATE ABOVE FIRST LATERAL BRANCH @~ CONNECTED WITH 2-3/4 STEEL p BANDS II'i~ 2 X 4 X 8 WOOD BRACE 3 MIN. OR IP= - = I = SUITABLE SIZE AND LENGTH 0 TO NAIL III I~ oR ~ JN~ ~ ~ ~M N G3LPER TR E) E , ~ NAIL ~ _ _ BRACES TO BATTENS. DO NOT NAIL PLACE SAFETY FLAGS ON ALL BRACES OR , S UB ND G OU DCO DIRECTLY TO TRUNK _ EXCAVATE HR A R N VER Y ~ - BEDS TWICE THE SIZE OF ROOT BALL Z z PAINT A CONSPICUOUS COLOR ~g - ~ . AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MIX: ~ ~ PLACE SAFETY FLAGS ON ALL BRACES OR .ES OR MIN. 3" EUCALYPTUS MULCH OR APPROVED _ 50% EXISTING SOIL . z m ~ ~ ~ PAINT A CONSPICUOUS COLOR 50% PEAT MUCK ~ ~ ~ " EQUAL SUBJECT TO LA APPROVAL - - II - IIII= EXISTING SOIL ~ Q MIN. 3 EUCALYPTUS MULCH OR APPROVED w EQUAL SUBJECT TO LA APPROVAL PROVED ~ O J 6" BERM TO HOLD WATER 1452 CARROLL DRIVE SHRUB AND GROUND COVER DETAIL ~ s" BERM TO HOLD WATER ~ IIII ,-I : i~la ATLANTA, GA 30318 ~ _ ~ _ FlNISHED GRADE _ III=u, -f111~1 ~-FINISHED GRADE I =~1 ~ A v2 A ~ II~~ _ (404) 352-2240 - a N EXISTING SOIL 1 „ ~ i ~UII! EXISTING SOIL DPLA@DPLAMAIL,COM 2° POST WITH CAP I = PLANTING SOIL MIX: >17? - n 'I ~pl~l~ 2" X 4" X 2' HARDWOOD STAKES EQUALLY NTS m ~ - 0% EXISTING SOIL tl I ~ `=~,i I~ 50% PEAT MUCK IIIII_Vil= li-lilll~'nl~ I~it gal a SPACED AROUND TREE ~p~_ - PLANTING SOIL MIX: (TO BE USED THROUGHOUT - , 6'-6" O.C. MAX. 4'-6° 1" RAIL PALM PLANTING DETAIL LARGE TREE OVER 8' HT.) PLANTING DETAIL 0% EXISTING SONTER ISLAND) ~t, , . ,,~,..n. ( 50~ PEAT MUCK ~ ~ . KANT SLAM ~ SELF-CLOSING NOTE; PALM TREE SUPPORT APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER ONE COMPLETE GROWING ETE GROWING SEASON NOTE: TREE SUPPORT APPARATUS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER ONE COMPLETE GROWING SEASON. _ .r LATCH ~ NOTE; BACKFILL PLANTING SOIL SHALL HAVE A BALANCED Ph. TEST EXISTING SOIL AND AMENDf< LARGE TREE SPECIES (GREEN ASH, SWEETGUM & LIVE OAK WILL BE FIELD ADJUSTED = ' • - IL AND AMENDMENT PRIOR TO BACKFILL A MIN. OF 15' FROM PROPOSED BUILDINGS, UTILITY LINES, EXISTING TREES AND SITE LIGHT POLES, ~ % ? - Q.' ' , ~ - TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL CHEMICAL AMENDMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE A BALANCED P A BALANCED Ph RANGE. '%,,~~~+~'I~1~~; m i ~i 5,_~„ 5,_~u 4,_~„ O a 4 -0 -5 2X4 (TYP.) = w N 1 2" PICKET / Za o ~ 1/2" PICKET 2X6 STRINGER ~ ~ Z 0 4" O.C. (NP.) I - W i~ ~o ~ ~c 1" RAIL ~ ~ ~ ~ I- ~ ~ g W ~ V+ LL ~a w Wa 10" DIA. IMITATION Q ~ ~ ~ ~ CORAL ROCK a a Z a a ~ COLUMN, TYP. ~ a • a ~ ~ W~Q~ ~ • .I . i 4 d' Z ~ ~ o I I 'I 2X6 STRINGER Z o I 4vq, I I°.,' . 'I N ,°a ~ ~I I a .Q.,~~Q .~~~a. 4X12 CROSS BEAM ~ w FINISH GRADE (TYPICAL) °C a • C ° " II 1 II L- •J L- 3/4 =1-0 a 4X 12 BEAM (TYP.) ~ 1'-0° CONCRETE FOOTING BUILDING WALL PLAN . 2 -9 $'.Q" This drawing, as an instrument of service, is 5'-0" O.C. TYP. „ A and shall remain the property of the 28 DIAMETER FO AI N PRECAST URN 2'-6" Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the 2 0 permission of the Architect, TYP. TYP 5'-~~~ 5'-~~~ 4 _p 2X4 (TYP.) JOB NUMBER URN 3'-3" O.C. 2X4 TYP. 2 -o -0 ~ > » TYP. -o TYP ~ 2„ 2401.1 9 TYP) DRAWN BYc CHECKED BY: 3" DATE OF FIRST ISSUE: MARCH 22, 2004 c 21I ~ 3" 2X6 STRINGER REVISIONS 2X6 STRINGER N0. DATE BY 4X12 BEAM TYP. 4X12 BEAM (TYP.) ELECT ICAL J-BOX R 4X 12 BEAM (TYP.) 4X12 BEAM TYP. N IMITATION CORAL ELEC: CONDUIT I c ROCK BORDER, TYP. IMITATION CORAL ROCK THROUGH COLUMN 5' POOL FENCE N LIONS HEAD POOL SIDE I AND GATE " " „ 10 DIA. IMITATION 16 X16 CREAMY TAN f~ TRAVERTINE TILE .CORAL RACK COLUMN TYP 10" DIA. IMITATION CORAL ROCK COLUMN, TYP ~Q ° a' SI AT ON a, " ' DE ELEV I ' ° ~ , : I FRONT ELEVATION I ~ ' I I IMITATION CORAL q F ROCK URN I ' , ° ~ I I ° ° I a , ~ 'a I SHEET TITLE . ' a ~ ° I, I I d I ;•a, ~ ,I I~ Q ~ .~a I' ° I I ' ° I _ I ~b ' i` ~ ~ .I ~ ° I,, , I DETAILS ~ • , a ° d IMITATION CORAL a - I a ~ • ~ I a~ ,'a ROCK CAP I• I I I I .I I. • n, a• M . ~ ~ ~ a- a - ~ t ,q I I STUCCO FINISH ' I I ~ ~ I ~ • ~ ~ • ' I I , ' , ' I L° ' ° I ~ ' L...~......., ,..a,') L~.~J L___J L ~_•J L_._..9 L ..9 L _ _ ~ L~ _ . J , ~ I 1'-4" NOTE: ELECTRICAL CONDUIT, ~ ® ~ ~ 'I ~ 2'-0" ~ POOL AREA ENTRY ARBOR DETAILS ALL WOOD MEMBERS SHALL BE Rl LL BE ROUGH SAWN SELECT GRADE CEDAR. (I HKUUUH (;ULUMN) T~ s IMITATION CORAL ROCK TREAT ALL WOOD MEMBERS WITH RS WITH A SEMI-TRANSPARENT OIL-BASED STAIN. L U FLUT POOL A~EA~W ALLFOUNTAIN D TAILSED BOWL V 1i=1'-0" (COLOR TO BE SELECTED) - I ' i ~ ~ I I l I , , a c ine 1 .II~IIYIlOIIYll.I10II.il.,,.lf~/71~..1,1~,{III ' 4 } a I i nnmiris ~miimiimiimiimiimiimiimii~iimii~inmiimumiimiimiimiim „ ~ , ! 4 1 .Note: I I 44 ~ All Irri anon E ui ment to be Installed 9 q P .I - ~ ~ ~ 1 2 1. ~ ~ with Pro ert Limits i.e. Insi P y de Walls , 45 1- 3 i- I I Equipment Shown Outside of Limits on + - ~ » + I ' Plans for Dlagrammatlc Purposes Only. 1 4 1 ! » > I „ I A roximate Irri anon Con roller Location. - ~ . ' + pP 9 i ~ ~ , 2, , 1 1452 CARROLL DRIVE i wner s Re resentative ~ haIII Pin oint Exact 40 43 4 ' , P ~ I p ATLANTA, GA 30318 . 4 I (404) 352-2240 Location at Site. Irri ation Contractor Shall gI ' - 1` N.~.~ _ , 3" DPLA@DPLAMAIL.COM 1 5 t i _ Hardwire 120 VAC Power td--Controller. 1-~ o ~ _ - - - - - - , _ _ _ n , , ; . ~ ~~-u' - ~ . ' I ; i, ` I _ _ _ ,i _ I ~ ~ r ii~ - - - ~ ~ ~ tl`f 1 m 4 i I 1 ~ ~ ; ~ 1 ~ ~ \ , - ~ ' 4' ~ ~ i ~ ~ . 4~_ / 1 .4+ j ~ I i ~ „ - 2 ~ ! ` ~ ~ 1 » 1 » 1' 1' - 2 . i 4+'... i , 2 2 o I .1 nl I;~",, ,p~~ - Ic, ; 4 4 4 2 2. { ; , 5 01`C ~.~I i~,,I',/L ~I~>Lr_ I r { ~f 3 ~r , ~ ~ _ p _ _ - . . _ - ° , ~'~.~'1: I 4 ~ ~ 7 i I ~ 4 1 ~7 I I ~ I I I -1 r;, y L-F,~ rt ,1,.:~1 ~ i i II p 1' ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 f ~ L I,. It -c__a~, { , - 1~- ti "1y./ I~ 17 ; ~ I °1 ,4. , : a L-i i 12 , w } ~ i !~'~I I , ~ ' n I~ 1 I~ i , -r _ l r:. , f t r-. ~ I___ - i' ~a, ~ ~-tip ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1, ~ - 43 ~ N + I,+, `i >il ~ r iyrllr-t,11:.rR ~ r 1:~k I ~r;-_ I ~ ~ l I , ,I + ~ I C' i, ' I ? I , • 4 +i i ~ „I ~ i i I. i fi - ,I i .,.4 ~ I 1 + l ~ ! ~ » ~l p 11 ~ ~ ~ I . l I ~ ~ _ i 1 I. ~ J X14 ! . _ II l ~ ,_-.._....__._,_...___f ~ i:_ ~ ~ i JI ~a I I ® O ~ ~ p . ~ , _ ~ ; i , ~ , t .r.~~ -,1; ~`l i ~h I I I')~(~ ~~,I' ~ , + ,~j ~f II ~ ~L~~_ i , r'- ~ I~ , i - ~ J s I~ .i ,I. , ~ ~ ~r. ~j~R i I I 1 ' ~ 1 L~ ~lJ ))III + , I T ! li ~ S t'` `tik y~. ` ' i I' I I I I I l'-au. ~.vv~.kecrj ' ~V -~-I I I ~ n_~ J I I L, f ~ '°1 ~ W V LL r I II i ~ I,. 7 ~ ~ r~ I~ T~ 'r'I ~ srt,~~~~ .h 1 t ~ ~ I i 1 .iI ~ » I, I I I ~ I li~~~~((~~u'. I I I C~ ~ I 0 f Q. 1' ..f,~k I . _ .r._,,., I I p ~ ~ 1 I ~ Z I,LI . _ . . I ~ ti ,I r. I~ ! 1' 1 1 Ip I ~ a - - J , i ` _ ' ~.f•.c-.~ ~ t I c. ' • I I ~U it ~ ~ - II ~ Via' I ~ iX~ I L, f ii r• ` - ~ W a I ~ Q~ ~1. _ ~ ~ ~ I ~ _I. A , . ~ ; I --=:r-- ~ ~ , L:' } '..'^t _ I A ~ N~ J~ X ' v ' r'~>1` r ~'I ~Y~ I ~ ` kl I j I » I ~ ~.,!U - p,. 111 IV+ !liil'I i ~ I.~ i I' 'I Ikl ~ I I t~ ,m ~ ~ ~~s¢;~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ __J . , I T ~ . , a~ _ ;'7i. - 1 n 1i +I ~ I~il ~I i ~ ~ i I I i ~ ~ f. _ ~S~.vsc. t~ _ T ) ; , N _ I. I - _ ~i< . r/ ~ w-- J_~ 1~~~,.~. I~ 1 iimiimiimiimnmuuiimiimiimii~mirirn~Himmm~mnmiimnmiim'iioiimumu~iimiimiimu¦ ~ ~ ~ Q a a Matchline B J a I , ; ~ , ~ ~ { ~ ~ r I~, 1 .~r, '~1 I c; ilL~ ~.f m. W 1 a ~ , . , ~ 4 W a I ~ ~ ~ ~~~1 i 34 i„ i ~ ~ ~ {i: l ~ I ~ , ~ ~ V , i _ ~.Y_, I r ~ (~I ~ ~ I i i _ r.:. :r-~ i~ I .....1 Z Z ---~-J-~~- III r~ e 1 _ G. M r : i n _ _ . I ~ ~ ' ~~jj~ I ! - r ~i, > -V i f I~ I nll II 4(9~ I ~ r ~ ( 7T ,T,_n> i i ~C ~ t- ~---6, ~r ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~Mn t T,~...- ~ I i r` ~ ~ t; y M0 J1 i~~ I i - _ I ~1~1~1,k.u..~, 1 ~ ~ 4 I x.- ' i I ~ c ~-I i _ ~i I i ~ IIII iU>~' I. I : • 1 V~ 3~~, a ' ,i i ' F ':I. • i..,... ~ F i I I i I 6 ~ , .`fi J~.. L ! f 4~ ; 1 1 s-f----.~ , .2 4 ~ _ , _ ~I a :d ~ it P I ~ ` I _ ~ . , j ~ ~ _ ~ _ , ~(i ~ , 4 ~ `,'1 ~ ~ _ I I f ~~r .r~a~~~'sr~la~~i~ » `~a~~:~ ~~a 'f~~-~ ~ " ~ I ..I~::... ~ ~'-I;: , ; r- ~ i l h 1` 1 r'-~l I ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ f ~ ! ~i ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ PE~FST21,4ti ~ 1 - 1 1,O~tD 1~' la! i''~'E AiSLi~ 14 „ ~ ~ I; ~ 1 ~ - ~ j f` f~ CClidivECi!0!~! iG I i~ I I j ~iNELLA5 i Rr,l~ - _z~ T ~ _ - _ . 1 _ ~ , 1 L~.__ I I This drawing, as an instrument of service, is + ~ a ~ a n~r..; ~ ~ a:r i ~~~i`a ' i-i ti ~ - n -i ~ I i I. - ~ r I ! ~ , - C ~ ~ 1 and shall remain the property of the I I I ~ _L. 1 ~ i ' L ~ i ~ I Architects and shall not be reproduced, • 1-=- ~ - ~ i, I ~ published or used in any way without the ' C „ , ~ ~ E i 4 permission of the Architect. I r • ' ?i, 1 .i.'l~~aa~a'c~ A~eI~ aa~~r~v 'm~~aa~ai~e?~ a~`a~ a ~1w~lwxa~a~aa~ I , "t ~ ~ I `i:.., q.., ~ ~ 'II I II ; I r~. ~ Lr'," .'1! .I --ti~~ I f) r.. , I » it - ! ~ » _ I~ 1 ~ . - - -r ~i'.. v .Y . ~===~q ~rr- JOB NUMBER I' , i ~ )~<)I ~ ~.I c'i~r`~ i 2 ( ~ :;~„I I II~ ~ 1,..- II t - - - ~ I v_ _ _ I i + Ir - - i i- 34.5 •II Z.I I _ I. .7~4 ~ _ tll~-~ I,, I... ~I`. _ I Ji ' ; ~ 4 1 ' 1 ~ ; • i' 13 2401.1 i ;i'(=~ i ' I ! 41 ~ i' k ~ ,!>I,'~t~..~ all ~ -~f~ l I^ 1 ~ ,I .l+ uie1111~1i1 G:,:: ( _ _ it ~'I I iii I C~-~.~ r ' + II ' ' ~ I ' rl a s'- v~ _ ! rrry - T I ~ - - -,r ~ y 'I i ,.I ~ P 7 r 1 2 I I ~k , , 1 4) Ih,!li +IT I ~ x::4:1_. - ; 1 i I ~ ~~~,I + - - _ 4 -1 DRAWN BY: ~ i : 3 ~I » a ,I _ :d, . ; I ! s,, l t ~ t - - - - - I: ,i t , ~ Ch>' ~ ` ' ~ ~ ~ f ' .L Yr ' h ?`Tf~i" T r~ ~ I ~ i i I Y - ~i I_ • i- ~ ~ 4 ~ I t~?i _,.',FL!L~ .~i1~.1. 1 n I I I ' ~ ~i I 1' CHECKED BY: ~ I - ' I:: u i i rJ ~ I~r ~ I I'Y' K i' ~ 'II I i - _ _ _ ~ F' g I ij ~ ~ 1 DATE OF FIRST ISSUE: , ~ , I i I I! I I i .l _1~i'.3~_ ~ I't^'C~~i - 1 1,~ I :.I i i ] I ~-N.' I J / ~i ~ ~ ~ „ I MARCH 22, 2004 _ . 'I r r ~ I ~Il~~ ~~41 ~ I I ~ ' ~ it ! n I F~~ ~ ~ ~t~~ I > ~ 1_ I I ~ I I~ 1 ~fi I 1 ! ~i I I ,I 1., . 1 ' yip. , ~ ' 1 ~ I ` - ,1~;~:'-,. ~ I , I 2 rs. n._,. ~ p ~ ii 1 " ( 1, 1 REVISIONS ~r~~~, ~ .,:1 I - ~ , iI r I , ~ , ~....t ~i 1L`-.~ 'r I ~ ~ ~ i I 1 , ~4 ' , I Vv I. L_, I ~..i. i i i I I m - ~ ,il 111 ~ ~ f~" ; to w I ' - ~ ~j ` ~ ~ I _ I-: I J. Q- 11 ~ > r~ , , , Q r- 7j I _rr ~ i I_. ~ i - + ~ -/~s ~:L~J jI N0. DATE BY I ~ h , ~ , I I. 1. - it ;+'~iIP i~ I , ~ r II I I i. ~ :;1 . ~ ~ _ ~_.:1I1.._._ . I I ' - i `-~-~~z T; ~II~ 1 5-11-04 DLP 1 - ' I ~ ~ 1 1 i I~ ~ ~La - I"~~ z ! 1 1, I II ~ - , ' _ V_ ' _ ~ II~I(~ f ~L..~ll~t~lllt. i i ~ ~ 1 I ~ r I ~ I~ `~1 I I~ i 7-+~ I II I 1 I I I 11 r I ---1~- _ ~ i I ~ ~ 1 ~1 I ~ r i 'I ~ - - - - - I I I 1 1 I ' , ~ I ,I 2 ~ ~ ~~l r ~ ~.','i'~ I I a I i i ~ I` ~`.l 'r , a~'Yrj~' r II r. .t :V - 1 I ,t ?Y. ~ ) ii _ I ----I~ I! ~I 4 ~ ~ l~ _ ~ r j :.r.)(. ~ ; ~J:,.. ~ ~ ir.' LII J`.. '..,:I._ i 1°Itll-'°._.1~`=' ' I~ '-.i C L, , » I , I r Jai L ~ 1 , ! I I I t,' E1 I I I 1 Xy . rf~r -1~ ' I c~: - ~ __J _ + J _ ~ ~ I ' I II Ir , i j I i i~~ ,I 1 I I~ i ~ ~ . , , ~ .i~ • 11 I ! 2 6 ~ ~ ~ II Ii;~~u~1 i - i 2 Irn anon Water Mter - ~ i ~~~~2y I ~ , { I ~ , System Requires 90 PM C~ 65 PSI. , ' tl . _ ~ „ I ~ ~ ~ h I ~ ~r--~'.j~ ! J I . ~ I „ » I i I i .I I__ I ~ I I I i I 1 i ' P~ I ~ t'.. f~ .l . ~ I_____. I - ~ '~e Irri anon Contractor shall Ver1f i~ fil,~, 1, ~ 1 ~ i 4 i ~ ~l ~ ~ ~~1 45 I n _ : ~ I I _ :.f-~- . ~ 4,4.5 I ~ Re ulrements at Site Before ~ „ " I:~,- ,.,I,-- ,k ;~a ~ ~ I, „ li r I 2_2 q ~ ~ ~ ~ F i 1 >,q ~ - 1 :L:_{~ i ~ 1. Startln constructlon.l ~ ~I I I 4 , i. - r>, ~ _ 1~y I I 9 4, f. i ~ ~ ~ II :I ~ t~; 1 . ~ ~ ,I ~ I _ ~ ~ l 1 I1~11_ I ~ i I, ~r , 1 1 4 1 ~ i 1 » I ~ , ( I 1 ~ I i ~ , „ 1- ~ ~n °1 ~ ~ s ri 'I ! I ~ 1 2 . 1 ~ 7 . r 4 2' 'r t; II ! , - , : ~ ~ U~~- ~i~(~ ~ 11 • : - _ ~q nn i ~ - I 1 , m- i . . ~ - ._a. _ , ~ . . ~ I - ~~~~a.a~,..:a~~a~~a~~aaaaa~aras.a'r mar` a~;a..~~ra o a. _ ' raaio~~a~~~.a I `r I ~i "L i':I I I i - " i I h'.r v, i ,r,- . i ~~h~a ~ ~~.Lil.~ I i i " ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~1.111.~~1 I ~:1 's } ~i ' 4_ jrL' I i c~ - „ } ~ II ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 SHEETTITLE 1( i I + I - 2 I r I ci' II n , - 11 t... " ,a:: , I I i + i 2-g ~ 1,~ 1~~. ~~-~L 1 i ~ - ~ i ~~~.~-r_~.-,. ~ , ~~~='~i ~ 1 ~ IRRIGATION l I ! 2 l + ! i ~ - ~ - I _ - I ~ PLAN ~ I _ ~ , I , I pproxl ~ a e rrlgation Controller Location. _ ° _.a __I. : OvJner?'s !Re resentative Shall Pin oint ~ " p p Exact 1 ~ a - 1 4 Location at Site. Irrigation Contractor Shall 2 - 2" 2 Hardwire 120 VAC Power to Controller. 45 2-3 0' 20' 40' NORTH SCALE 1"=20' ~ c~~ ' ~ ~ ~ r j _ _ _ _ _ ~Q / 1 ice' ~ I i f I f ~ ~ + ' i `,r i ~ i 1 e~ I I ~ J, !I i I i Via. 1 ;'i , j 1 `f 1452 CARROLL DRIVE ,1 f 1 ATLANTA, GA 30318 (404) 352-2240 i I ~ 1 DPLA@DPLAMAIL.COM I I C y t ~ i, ~ ~ , III REfF~i}OM i~, ; ~I I f ~ 1~. i l ~ ~c I 4 t\ i t t_ I; ~d. / \ J ~ ~I I. W 4,,~111NIL~~»,,,,,,,,~: I i. I •r~.! p3 }J 3,1, I ,<I 1 I 1 ~.I m is i I I ` 0 O W a _ t O I: N - - _ - 1,I D i ! rl 1 cil . ~ 11 a Z I ~ ~I: ~ I ~ , ~I~l;~ 'r D ~ i rl ~1S' OwE '~rVgY DRIJE ;AIciE i,•''~, 7i, 1:~~, - ~ W ~J - ;R,. - _ _ L I~ I,. I ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1,1 i U 11 i "~Tr01T¦1T~1'I ¦ ~ _ ~ - ~ I t ~ [ i5 ~i L lA`( LK l~ r,~L.L ,;~I~f~a I `'w ~ , i ~ I LC 1' ~ ~G--- --ti Y ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r^ ~ v ~ I 1 I ~ ~ O V V/ LL ~ r; I ~r / ¦I~¦ _ ,~,u, a - p 1{' I__~ - 11"1 I ~ 7 1 1. I ~ - _k L- I ' I ~ W ~ ~ ~ W a ~ 'II~~'IIIII'II,Lr L.`'~ ~--_.~W ~-~~-jl ,~h,~~n_, Irj II ~i~if _ t ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ . 1 I ~ ~i .._..:e-,~ _ ~ r~.. .,.~i ~E~..I ~ Q W ~ a I ~ -r ~ ~ ~ `1 r" ~ I ~ ;I ' I. ~..li I G_,, _ a \i I.1 D I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ r, . ~ ati s~. ~ H ~ . H x r ~ o~ Z Q - ~ I A~~a~. I `.C. """j ~V':~ L~ ~__1 .Y .~.a.~_ 1..~-~...~..,~.~ 1~,x " I .a k ~~~1~N. I If;, I fi ~I. ~ a nQ. ~ H I' W i ,?rlr a ~,~~~1 ;~i, Ik} _ ~=f~ I;i 1,,; - 1- ~ U, , g i I i 1 ~ ~ , i~ iii i C ~ / : ~ ?`pp~~~~ i I I`iI1~I1. it J~,~! . J Q I ~ i j I I I.. d I LLl .I ~ t{ F.. ~ - r r'> ~ 11 E i J W ~ a T ~ ~ L~.11~ 11_~,~, ~I Ilr z i ~ ~ r: - ~/n~ X ,I .,r~ ~1= err t : l,~ I ~ ~ ,<r r~~ I ~ I~-- 1i~~~~I , ~i,~ly Z ~ C~ r~ ,i ~ W - . J~ ~ O 1 ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ D , _ fiI I~~t,~;; ~ ~ .t ~ ~ 1 1 ~ 1 f ~ 1 q ~h ~ N Ilia II i I E ~ ~ Q r I ~ ~ I 1 ~1 1i' I , End r II~1~ Iii I " ` r - _ ~ g ~ e<,~ ; i ~ 1 1. ~C. I ~ } ~1 x ~ i i - '1' ~ ~ Ix`~ Ii - ~ I ~ 1• • ~f B a % 1 i „s=, 1 s . _ I i '4 II ,I. r ~ x _ IC. I, I, , t ~I I ~ al I D - _ Q;; D_: ~-t ~ ~:~r.. 1 4 ~L~h¦\ a ~ ~ r _ 1 - - - - - - ¦ - - - - ~I ~ L__ ~ _ , . f. I ~ fi__ , 0 l- v . i'. - \ I~~ I, j~\ "reDE;TRiNU o PA~;Ea 2~}' t~RNE AISLE ! I~ ~ ,r„ A I~ ~ I ~ hI - 0 B _..J\ -1 r,¦I 'iii ~ ~ r0~i\ECr,.~„ TO i ~7 PIiJF1.l BFi'~~ r _ c_ I:. 7'._.J r. ~ _ I 1 , I I ' This drawing, as an instrument of service, is 1..;, and shall remain the properly of the • _ . r_._ ~ - - I:. Architects and shall not be reproduced, f ,I ~h + ~ t _~~L_J_ _:J 1 '~.4a roe I~.. - 1 j. 'd iC , f l < + , ' published or used in any way without the I I ~ L { 1 I ` ' ' ~ permission of the Architect. `vI I I Il'1 ~ ~ . - i- I; it I I ~lllr,. I i ' i I I : ` '1 ~~i I I r' t ~ r~ I~ CV ~ _.l: .f 1"It _ Y'. ~ ~ ( _ uu _ _L) 1'..il II~~~Ll,~ltl~tl IIA-I P~' fl: sr1 f -__L} I.~_~- sly. ~ ~ I k I u t~~~•~{ I ~ 1 f~~'1, JOB NUMBER A=~.~,;4.~ ~ I i tl , - ~ r i Lr i~ Ire!, . . ~~~¢~,t ~ ~ SLEEK/l N G LEGEND 2401.1 I - ~ ~ i'~1~' D t ; IIIVI L.~, ~r- I I ~ . ->~~,.,I 1 - I 1 ~~I_ _ ~ ~ 1~.. _ i ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~f~. i '~~.t ~ I ~ -r,~ . ~ , l r~, I ~ O_ DRAWN BY: ~ 1 ~ ~ i ~ , ~ ; , , ~ II~II~1 1~~~'~1 - v~ , . ~ ~ ILA "~I" " ~ ~ r 1 y"> I I ~ 7-~ I EI F~t ~j ~71 I{I Jam,' ~ 1 1 IIP ICI }o ,,f~ III,,,'., A 8" CLASS 200 PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVE ~~.:~:,~;;-~si: CHECKED BY: ;i'; . I 1 ~ 11 ~ h~ I i I n ~ sk , D " 'r ~ s r » DATE OF FIRST ISSUE: - I ~ , i ~ A ~ E 4 ~ 1~ i D - ~_I i< ~ . yy 6 CLASS 200 PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVE ~IaRCHZZ,zooa 1 ~ I - t ~ ~a, I II ; 1A ( ~ 1,!x;1 ~~.~l~fL~lu,~ L J . rv ~ .::~~-~rffl,r'~ . ~ ~ ~ t r r ~ ~~~,2?7=.~,: Iti~ ~ t C C~'~~'~ ~Ill'~ii! ~ I ~ a j~ ~ D ( ~t ; i t n i I~ hll i~ I~~~;: l1 1 it ~ ~ - ~ ° 8I ~ 6 fz s+'+•. I j li ~ I _t, ~'3- ~Y' ~ ~I © 4" CLASS 200 PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVE REVISIONS ,I I ~ h; . I' 1 afiw~ ~ ~ .R>t' frY f y ¦ .1 L4~i = ~ J~ N0. DATE BY I . rrxxirr d ~a ~ >w' z r r~ t I I III ,'I. I JJ r? '+,e W~ ~ l,C, 4 V ~ _ 1 ~ i is _ < 1, ~ ./;~~t,1i~Lf ~I ~ i ~ " ¦ I ,a~._ ..fit s r l ! .a + ~ L! i - ==f' III 1 s ,l I LJ ,l~~l 3" CLASS 200 PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVE 1 5-11-04 ccc ~ l~ vJ r ~~I it I r{`T.~.~ 1 ~ I I 1~ I , ; „ - _ - r _ II ~ i ¦ ~ M~.:: i~.,> ~I ~ T a~~;~, r 'I 7 I i I I ~ _ _ I. I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ Q a==~ 1. C...l1 R 1 _ , ~ C ~ . ~ ~ , : " I I - _ ~ _ I i r ~ C..", . , . i 1 JI 0 ~ - ~ ~ ' ~ . ~ , sx~ ~ I I _ ~ -i.1 ti q NOTE: INSTALLER OF SLEEVES SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO LOCATE ~ ~ if SIEEVES IF NOT PROPERL'f INSTALLED. l , I ~ Cr , . - - - - - ~ U - - ~ 17 - _I ¦IIO s ..I It i ~ m.,. i'~~ --~1~~~~ S ~ ~ _ ~ n I , ~ I ~ ,I ~ ~ ' ~ 18" ~ R=- ~ - C ~ i, 1; I ~ - d 1, 12°MIN.+ ~ i a 'f~ ~ - - - T ~ _ _ - I ~ _ _ _ _ . _ ' _ ~ _ a _ _ - _s_ . . _ I : rl ~ ~ i . ~ I I I I _ 24° MIN. 12"MIN. CLASS 200 PVC SLEEVE } BEDDING AND COMPACTION AS PER ENGINEER'S SPECIFlCAiIONS SLEEVI N G I NTS - ~ SHEET TITLE S~° IRRIGATION SLEEVING PLAN ~ ~ n 0' 30' 60' NORTH SCALE 1"=30' CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL CHRISIIE MFG. IRR GATIOf~ LEGEND ~ PLASTIC VALVE ID TAG ~ /r; 2 WATER METER, SYSTEM REQUIRES 90 GPM ~ 65 PSI. AMETEK JUMBO VALVE BOx FINISH ~ / - REC. N7TH COVER RAIN BIRD PEB GRADE 6 IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE , _ r ELECTRIC REMOTE ~ FlNISH ' SCH. 80 NIPPLE CONTROL VALVE BAHLB AP\V~C / GRADE RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM SERIES HI-POP cling SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AT SITE BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTION. ~~Q • T.O.E. HUNTER I-20 ADS SERIES FlNISH RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM SERIES SCH. 80 NIPPLE GRADE MANUAL DRAIN VALVE. SCH 80 PVC BALL VALVE. DETAIL-E. ~ ~ SCH. 80 T.O.E. UNION : , SCH. 80 3/4° X 12' SCH. BO . ~ C ELL PVC NIPPLE 1 1 WATTS #909-M1-QT-2", 2" REDUCED PRESSURE ASSEMBLY BACKFLOW 1/2° X 8" SCH. 80 1/2" X 8' SCH. 80 PVC NIPPLE PVC NIPPLE ~ ~ m PREVENTER. DETAIL-F. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t CLASS 200 LATERAL LINE / LATERAL LINE ~ / / SCH. 80 (2) 3/4' MARLEX ` ~ ` RAIN BIRD ESP-16-MC CONTROLLER: 16 STATION, COMPUTER CORRUGATED PVC ~ STREET ELLS LATERAL LINE #1 #2© CONTROLLER, FOUR PROGRAMS, WALL MOUNTED. DETAIL-J IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO INSTALL AMINI-CLIK it 10" PIPE ? .c\ ~ LATERAL LINE ` STREET ELLS g ' s~,~T•~ LEx RAIN SENSOR .AND AFREEZE-CLIK DEVICE FOR EACH CONTROLLER. 1452 CARROLL DRIVE ATLANTA, GA 30318 ~ ~ \ (1) 3/4' MARLEX STREET ELL RAIN BIRD 150-PEB OR 200-PEB PLASTIC ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL (404) 352-2240 MAINUNE 1/2"-3/4" CRUSHED STONE ` ~ (1) 1/2" MARLEX STREET ELL (1) 1/2" MARLD VALVE, 11/2" OR 2" SIZE, MOUNTED WITH SCH 80 PVC BALL VALVE, DETAIL-A. DPLA@DPLAMAIL.GOM (1) 1/2• MARLEx STREET ELL A LAWN ROTOR B SAWN SPRAY C SHRUB SPRY D B SPRAY ~ RAIN BIRD 100-PEB PLASTIC ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE, 1" SIZE, NTS NTS NTS NTS MOUNTED WITH SCH 80 PVC BALL VALVE, DETAIL-A. ~ - GPM, BIRD 1806GPMMQUARTOER 0~5LGPM, 30RPSLSDETAILE~, 12' RADIUS, FULL-2.0 ~ <,'.~~,I ;,1 ; :J • ~0 RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM, 6" POP-UP LAWN SPRAY SPRINKLER, 15' RADIUS, FULL-4.0 ' `t ;i . GPM, HALF-2.0 GPM, QUARTER-1.0 GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-C. - ' ~ fr~ ~ ~ ~ ''~~Pd'~ O RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM, 6 LAWN POP-UP SIDE STRIP SPRAY SPRINKLER, 9 X 18 / CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE HEAT TAPE WITH THERMOSTAT CONTROL RADIUS, 1.5 GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-C. ~ •~''~~,,~~li~1,1;~`.',. CONTRACTOR TD COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES SCH 80 PVC BALL VALVE IN REFERENCE TO PIT CONSIRUC110N,INSTALLAl10N AND VENRNG INSULATED tdd IIIII OF BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVCE. FlBERGLASS STEP 1 NOTE: FOR WIRE SIZES #14, #12 AND X10. 10" VALVE BOX ENCLOSURE ~ ~-1/2" - O RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM, 6" LAWN SIDE STRIP SPRAY SPRINKLER, 4' X 30' RADIUS, 1.5 GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-C. O a REDUCED PRESSURE PRINCIPLE GALVANIZED BACKFLOW PREVENTER Nipper (TYp•) NOTE INSTALLER OF SLEEVES SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO LOCATE STRIP WIRES APPROXIMATELY 1/2" FROM ENDS SLEEVES IF NOT PROPERLY INSTALLED. INSIBLE TO LOCATE ~ RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM, 6" LAWN END STRIP SPRAY SPRINKLER, 4' X 15' T ~ GALVANIZED AND TWIST ENDS TOGETHER. PlAS11C VALVE BOX STEP 2 ' ~Y~ ` \ WITH LID (TYP.) - ~ - RADIUS, 1.0 GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-C. ~ N \ ~ ~ IN WT GALVANIZED RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM, 12" HI-POP SHRUB SPRAY SPRINKLER, 15' RADIUS, FULL-4.0 ~ W MAINLINE , \ FlNISH GRADE BRASS ISOLATION UNION (TYP.) ig" li ~ GATE VALVE STEP 3 TWIST WIRE NUT ONTO WIRE ENDS. ~t8"~'"_~ GPM, HALF-2.0 GPM, QUARTER-1.0 GPM, THREE QUARTER-3.0 GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-D. 0 ~ Z O FlNISH GRADE PUSH WIRE NUT ' c FLOW INTO CONNECTOR RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM, 12" HI-POP SHRUB SPRAY SPRINKLER 12' RADIUS FULL-2.0 ~ F- W 12° MIN. r r 1" PVC NIPPLE TYP. PAST TABS. ( ) \ ~ ~ GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-D. Q ~ ~ p o ~ r . STEP 4 STEP 5 2a"MIN. ~ RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM, 12" HI-POP SHRUB SIDE STRIP SPRAY SPRINKLER, 9' X 18' u' ~ ~ ~ i `n\ ~ a , i2°MIN. RADIUS, 1.5 GPM, 30 f'SI. DETAIL-D. ~ ~ N ~ U 1/2"-3/4° STRAP TOP TO CLASS 200 CONNECTOR: PVC SLEEVE ap CRUSHED STONE ~ + ' f RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM, 12" HI-POP SHRUB SIDE STRIP SPRAY SPRINKLER, 4' X 30' W ~ LL^ ab SYSTEM ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ` 9 ~ RADIUS, 1.5 GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-D. ~a W Wa 1/2"-3/4" CRUSHED STONE MAINUNE / ~ ~ ~ / / 2 CUBIC FEET TO WATER 3/4' GATE VALVE DRAIN THRUST ~ a SOURCE WITH 1 CU. FL GRAVEL SUMP BLOCK (TIP.) TABS F- BEDDING AND COMPAC110N AS PER ENGINEER'S SPECIFlCATIO RAIN BIRD 1812-SAM, 12" HI-POP SHRUB END STRIP SPRAY SPRINKLER, 4' X 15' ~ ~ ~ ~ IGINEER'S SPECIFlCAl70NS m ~ ~ Z RADIUS, 1.0 GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-D. ~ a a H = RPA BACKF~O W DEv ICE F • RAIN BIRD 1806-SAM, 6" POP-UP FLOOD BUBBLER, 5' RADIUS, 1.0 GPM, 30 PSI. DETAIL-C. .Wj Q ~ E MANUAL DRAIN VALVE NTS G WIRE CONNECTION H I111J ~ a s~EEVING Nrs IRRIGATION CONTACTOR SHALL SUBMIT BACKFLOW DETAIL TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR APPROVAL BEFORE STARTING CONSTRUCTIO Nrs 3 M - D B Y Nrs N. e ~ ? QUARTER-1.07 GPM, L40 PSI,ODOERAILO'BRADIUS, FULL-6.8 GPM, HALF-3.4 GPM, ~ Z w 0 8 ® HUNTER I-20 ADS LAWN ROTOR, 30' RADIUS, FULL-3.4 GPM, HALF-1.7 GPM, ~ W QUARTER-.85 GPM, 40 PSI, DETAIL-B. RAIN BIRD #5 QUICK COUPLING VALVE 1" SIZE. CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY TWO QCV a KEYS AND MATCHING HOSE SWIVELS. DETAIL-L. a N MAINLINE ISOLATION GATE VALVE, DOMESTIC DUCTILE IRON GASKETED, DETAIL-M. NOTE: i. ALL 'MRING TO BE INSTALLED AS PER LOCAL CODE 2 SEE CONTROLLER MANUN. FOR RAIN BIRD MAINLINE PIPE: 3" SIZE IF NOT NOTED. CLASS 200 PVC. ALL PIPE 2-1/2" AND LARGER MOUNRNG INSIRUCIIDNS CONTROLLER - 3. INSTALL ALL MANUFACTURER'S - - - - - - SHALL BE UNIBELL GASKETED PVC PIPE AND HARCO PVC GASKETED FITTINGS. CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL CODES AND ORDINANCES IN REFERENCE RECOMMENDED uGHTNf'G NOTE TO IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR: PARAPET COPING TO THE INSTALLATION OF PVC PIPING AND LOW VOLTAGE WIRING. PROTECnON AND GRO?t+D 1. LOCATE WHERE RAIN CAN FALL DIRECTLY INTO 10' VI THRUST BLOCK AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. DETAIL-N. ROD GRID. MAIN SUPPLY, LATERAL MAIN LATERAL LOW-VOLTAGE 120 VOLT 6' CHANNEL ELECTRICAL CONNECTON DEVCE AND WHERE IRRIGATION HEADS CANNOT SPRAY INTO SENSOR AREA. RAIN SENSOR 10" VALVE e0x - AND LOW-VOLTAGE WIRING SUPPLY LINE WIRING WIRING BOx WITH TERMINAL BLOCK TO INTERFACE 2. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S 0 FIELD WIRING AND CONTROLLER SPECIFICATIONS. IRRIGATION SLEEVE: CLASS 200 PVC, REFER TO SLEEVING PLAN. DETAIL-H ~ 6-8" LIGHTNING PROTECRON - - - p~„yg~ ~ 3. INSTALL WHERE RAIN CAN FALL DIRECTLY INTO _ ~ ~ This drawing, as an instrument of service, is ~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ { r { r 1 DEVICE. WIRE CONNECTIONS BY IRRIGATION 12" 12" 12 12 12 CONTRACTOR. _ TUBING OR 18" 18" - LATERAL LINE PIPE: CLASS 200 PVC, SIZE NOTED. andshaliremaintheproperryofthe FlNISH GRADE Architects and shall not be reproduced, WIRING • LATERAL ~ ~ • WALL ELECTRICAL CONDUIT RAI N BIRD QUICK COUPLING VALVE published or used in any way without the MAIN LINE TO RAIN SENSOR (AS SPECIFlED IN LEGEND) • / 2" 2" 2' CONTROL JUNCTION BOX (BY OTHER ) 1-= - ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - 3" ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SLEEVE. permission of the Architect. • ALL 120 VOLT WIRING IN CONDUIT WIRES ~ (1 SCH. 80 ELI. (90°)" WIRES AND CONNECTIONS BY (13 SCH. 8D NIPPLE (3 LENGTH) ` IN ACCORDANCE WITH IRRIGARON CONTRACTOR, NOTES: JOB NUMBER LOCAL CODE. COMMON CONTROLLER ELECTRICAL CONDUIT BY 120 VOLT GENERAL CONTRACTOR. SCH. 80 NIPPLE ~ G POWER AND WIRE UL DIRECT (12" LENGTH ~ GALVANIZED NIPPLE 1. ALL SPRINKLERS WILL BE MOUNTED ON (3} MARLEX STREET ELLS WITH A SCHED. 2401 1 (3" LENGTH) ~ GROUND VARES BURIAL WIRES ) ` ( (TO REMOIE 80 NIPPLE SIZE OF SPRINKLER INLET. 20' CONTROL a CONDUIT VALVES) 1/2'-3 /z•-s/a" ceusHED sraNE 2. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE A AUTOMATIC DRAIN CHECK VALVE DEVICE %zie~'~',=' TIE A LOOSE 20" LOOP IN ALL MAIN SUPPLY LINES WIRING AT ALL CHANGES OF FlNSH REMOTE DRAWN BY: WHERE LOW HEAD DRAINAGE MAY OCCUR. TO BE INSTALLED IN olRECnoN GREATER THAN ao° FLOOR COMMON W7RE TO VALVES CONTROL TAPE AND BUNDLE ACCORDANCE WITH UNTIE ALL LOOPS AFTER All GRADE VALVE ~ u 3. ALL WIRE WILL BE COLOR CODED DIRECT BURIAL UL/UF WIRE: COMMON (WHITE) CHECKED BY; 1 SCH. 80 ELL (90 ) TUBING OR WIRING MANUFACTURI]YS INSTAL- CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN CONTROL WIRE TO VALVES MAINLINE ~1; SCH. 80 NIPPLE (3' AT 20' INTERVALS. CATION SPECIFlCATIONS. COMPLETED. SCH. 80 ELL (90°) #12-1, CONTROL (RED) #14-1. SCH. 80 NIPPLE (3• LENGTH) 4. ALL PIPING AND WIRING UNDER HARDTOPS WILL BE IN CLASS 200 PVC PIPE DATE OF FIRST ISSUE: MARCH 22, 2004 TR 6. ENCHI K RAINS N NG E SOR Q SLEEVE. ~ UICK COUP LING ~ L~ ~ ~r 1 ~ ~ REVI510NS NTS NTS NTS TYPICAL VALVE INDICATOR ~ CONTROLLER N0. DATE BY NTS 2s.5 GALLONS PER MIN. 1 5-11-04 CGC 10 STATION NUMBER GEf~ERAL ~IOTE~ VALVE SIZE 1, ALL MAINLINES TO HAVE A MINIMU 0 " M F 18 OF COVER. (CLASS /ER. (CLASS 200 16. CONTRACTOR TO UTILIZE APPROPRIATE AUTOMATIC DRAIN DEVICE PVC PIPE). JUMBO VALVE Box uo 2. ALL LATERAL AND SUB-MAIN PIPE TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 12" WHERE LOW HEAD DRAINAGE MAY OCCUR. COVER. (CLASS 200 PVC PIPE). MUM OF 12" OF 17. ALL' SPRINKLERS TO BE MOUNTED ON SWING JOINTS -REFER TO ' ~ 3. NO ROCKS BOULDER OR OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS TO BE DETAILS. =RIALS TO BE USED 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL BRAND VALVE BOX I.D. ON ALL COVERS. IN BACKFILLING OF TRENCH. Q . w~zx b' , ' 4. ALL PIPE TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFIC/ NOTE: ZS' SPECIFICATIONS. 19. 24 VOLT WIRE SHALL BE COLOR CODED; COMMON-WHITE, CONTROL-RED. COMPACT SOIL AROUND GATE FINISH GRADE ~ Q: f ' 5. ALL TH E • R ADED JOINTS TO BE COATED WITH TEFLON TAPE OR LI VALVE PIT ASSEMBLY TO SAME ~ TAPE OR LIQUID 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL MANUFACTURERS' RECOMMENDED GROUNDING EQUIPMENT FOR POWER SUPPLY AND VALVE OUTPUT WITH (2) 5/8" DENSITY AS UNDISTURBED 10" CORRUGATED PIPE TEFLON. ADJACENT SOIL. (LENGTH AS REQUIRED) 6. ALL LINES TO BE THOROUGHLY FLUSHED BEFORE INSTALLATION ~~ar w~~ 'M~s~ SPRINKLER HEADS. ISTALLATION OF COPPER CLAD GROUND RODS. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL MANUFACTURERS' RECOMMENDATION ON FAULT DOMESTIC GATE VAL - s~;,~:'Z Qy= ~ w~~ ~ ~ ~ , 7. SPRINKLER AND RELATED E UIPMENT TO .LED AS PER DETAILS. GROUND AND LIGHTNING PROTECTION. RUBBER RING OPERAl10N NUT ~ y.~. ~ Q BE INSTALLED AS PER y - 8: ALL ELECTRICAL JOINTS TO BE MADE USING WATERPROOF CONNI 'ROOF CONNECTIONS 22. ALL MATERIAL TO BE SUPPLIED BY CONTRACTOR TO OWNER: \ JUMBO AMEIEK VALVE BOX ~ ~ AS SHOW NON DETAILS. A. TWO WRENCHES FOR DISASSEMBLING AND ADJUSTING EACH TYPE sHEETTin.E INSTALLAToN NOTES: 9. ALL EQl)IPMENT NOT SPECIFIED IN THE LEGEND SHALL BE DETEF ,LL BE DETERMINED OF SPRINKLER HEADS AND VALVE SUPPLIED. v 1. ALL MAIN uNE To eE INSrALIEO ANO TESrmaccaeolNC AND FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ~~~r TO MANUFACNRER'SINSTALLAiION INSTRUCRONSWHIpi B. TWO KEYS FOR EACH OF THE AUTOMATIC CONTROLLERS. IRRIGATION SHALL BE A PARTOF 1HE INSTALIAnONSPECIFlCATIONS. 10. NO ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE IN THE FIELD EX( ' ~ ~ ' : Z. ALL TRENCH DEPTH AND W1D1N SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON A VALVE CONTROL BOX OR ANOTHER VALVE BOX SPECIFICALLY HE FIELD EXCEPT AT C. TWO QUICK COUPLER KEYS WITH MATCHING HOSE SWIVELS. DETAILS - 1HE IRRIGAl10N PLANS. CONNECTIONS. SPECIFICALLY FOR 23. SYSTEM IS DIAGRAMMATIC TO IMPROVE CLARITY. ALL MAINLINE PIPING ELECTRIC VALVES AND WIRING ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS 'i l MAINUNE \ 3. THE SUCCESSFUL CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR THE ~k/'~\ Y SERVICE OF 1HE MANUFACIURER'S QunuFlEO INSmucroR. 11. ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THIS SHEET AND OTHERS IN THIS S 1/2"-3/4" CRUSHED STONE ZS IN THIS SET MUST AND WITHIN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES. CONTRACTOR .SHALL REFERENCE THE „ ~ , BE REFERRED TO THE IRRIGATION CONSULTANT BY THE CONTRA THE CONTRACTOR LANDSCAPE PLAN PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF PIPING TO AVOID CONTACT ~ THRUST BLOCK ISOLATIO N vA~vE FOR CLARIFIC TI M A ON BEFORE PRECEEDING WITH THE WORK. WORK. WITH PLANT MATERIALS EXISTING OR NEW. ' 12. ALL 24 VOLT WIRE SHALL BE #12 OF/UL FOR COMMON WIRE, AP NTS NTS AON WIRE, AND #14 24. CONTRACTOR TO ADD EXTENSION RISER TO POP-UP HEADS WHEN NEEDED FOR ~ ..I ~ - OF/UL FOR CONTROL WIRES, DIRECT BURIAL, SOLID COPPER. COPPER. PROPER COVERAGE. ~ ' A • 13. CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIRI F FnR PR~PFR cwFRar,F nF a JFRA(;F ~F AREAS 25. C~NTRACTt7R SHAT I INSTAI I SPRINKI FR F(JUIPMFNT 1 FRAM FOl1N~ATI~NS. TO BE WATERED. I.E. ADJUST HEADS WITH INSUFFICIENT COVER/ ;TENT COVERAGE V ALSO INSTALL SPRINKLERS 4" FROM CURB -OR WALKS.. DUE TO BLOCKAGE BY EXISTING OR PROPOSED SITE FEATURES. FEATURES. 26. PRIOR TO BID IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RIGHT-OF-WAY AND 14.-CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN TO KEEP SPRINKL EEP SPRINKLER BACKFLOW REQUIREMENTS. NO LATER THAN FIVE DAYS BEFORE BID SUBMITTALS EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORY MATERIAL FROM INTERFERING WITH FERING WITH PROPER CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSULTANT OF ANY CHANGES FROM PLANS PLANTING, i.e. VERIFY ROOT BALL SIZE FOR PLANTING. ING. -AND EACH WIRE CONNECTION ° BQN MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EXPANSION COILS AT EACH WIRE i EACH 27.~IRRIGA IRRIGATION TOA IN VALVE BOX (WRAP AROUND 3/4" PIPE 12 TIMES). h I,",' 1 SOUTH FT. HARRISON ~T ~ y , ' ' l'.:w.~ a 70 R a ~~o ~ ~ ~ N ~ LEGEND Z ~ i . r a 1..~:~ ` S.DO' N 00 53 39 E , n % ~ 5.00 ~ 5.00 , Q - _ _ _ 276:15 N 00'5339" E S.oo, ° - - =Project Boundary 0 10 20 40 ~ ~ N 0 !53'39". E 120 ~2 : ~ 4 . 28.21' 23.00' 23.00' , \ ~ ` N. 00'53.39 , E 120.42 23.00' 2 1 \ y ~ ~ , = Existing Lot Line SCALE: 1" = 20' 0.89 \ ~ 2~: 23.00 23.00' , t. ~ ~ - , ` ~ ~ vv 23.00 28.21 0.46' \ r\ = Proposed Lot Line ~ ~ w ~ GA . c0 !n ~ V vV ~ 'C vv A 1 =Existing Lot Number O N \ ~ 4: \ Vl O p v v .,,v ~ v (A N N ~ ~ t0 ~ p \ b0 \I \ \ 00. 3 4 ~ p p~ . p ~o~ , ~ • =Proposed Lot Number UNE TABLE . LINE BEARING LENGTH 5 m oni °o o° o~? \ drn..~ ~C1'I, "o;,~ . ~ d pd rn N ~ p 7 ~ 9 O N \ O FJ' 6 O ~J ~ N L1. ` . S89'06'21~E 0.21' p m m , ` .r ` ` m LZ +N44'Q6'21°W 7.0T m ~ - ' b \ m ` ~ ` m m m m Oho 33 =Existing Block Number L3 S89'06'21"E 0.21' L4 N89'06'21"W 0.21' fA ~ a ~~D`: v` O L5 N45'53'39"E 7.0T DD ~ ` ` o ~ 4 .1 . , \ s ~ 28.21' 23.00' 23.00' \ ` ` ~ 23.00 23.21 , . ~ ~ `23.21' 23.00' 2 m 4' _ " ` ~ 3.00 23.00 28.21 pp N QO 3,39,.E ':120.42' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~m =Existing R/W To Be Vacated ` ~ ~ ` , ~;N 00'53'39" ~ 1.14' ~ E .}20.42 6 ~`v ~ 0.23' ~~mmea'v~r~sam~a~~wsac~~amm~smQ~am~c~e~ I ti _ r ~ 5 2 frl o a ~ ` o 2:48' ` ~ r ' ` ~ MAGNOLIA PARK aRK =Proposed Common Area (Tract A) ~ N"053'39° E''115.42';'- ~ . r~ a n;, W ~ 2 ~ E 92.4 to 23.21 23.00' 23.00' ` W 23.00 23.21 \ ` \ 23.21' 23.00' 3,0 ' ~ O P.B. 3, PG. 43 2 0 23.21 p 3 P ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ` ~ \ \ ~ ~ v v ~ `v ~ ~ , ( =Proposed Drainage Easement d and mop' ~co ~p ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~p °0prn 45 ~ 44 ~ . o ~ o ` ~ to . , ~ . ~ p p . O ~ 43 42 , . i , ~ p ~ • ~ N _ O O~ 4 a, . p O ~ ON Onj ON \O a,a?\ \ O01 12 m ON 14 _ p N 11 p 13 v m ~ ~ my v `v ~ ~ . , ~ m m ` v \ . _ TOTAL PARt:EL LGAL DESCRIPTION• , ` \ ~ vv ''9.00' 2.73 v~ ~rz; ~ - , ` \ ~ 7.7 ' 32.21' , o . , ' \ rn;~ \ 14.00 0 , „ 23.21' 23.00' 23.00' 23.00' ` Y~T1. ~ ~ , 23.21 ~ . ~ . ; `23.21 23.00' 10.21' N 00'53'39" E ~ 00 59 05 E ' 9" E -115.42', z_ ~ " a, N 00' 3`~3 ' ~ N. 00'53;39 E 56 42' Lt PARCELI LOTS 1, 2, 9,10; 8.11 BLOCK 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDINGTO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 27.18 ~ ~ L2 ,p o. N 01 09'55„ 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. w , N ' E • ~ TOGETHER WITH 0 0 . o~ ~ = ~ w~ 26.96 .M EXISTiNG°LOT ~ ~~~;~-,z~ i TRACT A PARCEL II LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 8 BLOCK 28, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, . ~ ~ N . ) ~D`Dti~~ ~ ` ~ , " m NUMBER TYP ,z,, N 00'53 39 E 45,00 PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. WATERLNE EAS~!ENT NOTE: ` . TOGETHER WfiH a ~ 6 ; ~ ~ tN,, ~ PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A TEN (10) F00T WATER MAIN EXISTING: BLOCK, rn ro 16 EASEMENT LYING FIVE (5) FEET ON EACH SIDE OF WATER PARCEL III MAINS UP TO AND INCLUDING ALL HYDRANTS AND METERS, BEGIN AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 29 OFTHE PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK, `MAGN~OL.IA PARK ~ ~ ~ ~ , " 11 NUMBER (1'YP) ~ , N00'5339 E= 1 EXCEPT WHERE SUCH MAINS AND RELATED WATER FACILITIES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND THE EAST ? ~ ~ I MAY .LIE UNDER STRUCTURES. RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF GRANTOR (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC-COAST LINE P B 3, PG. 43 T 14.1s o ' I ~ r, b 16.00 23.00 20.19 RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY) AND GO IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-0F-WAY LINI9, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 32 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION o S G 'OT , ° ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ EEO 11N , L x ~ ` ~ , ~ L4 L3 33 W . ~ . ACROSS THE SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY; TO THE ._~~j LINE (~TYP)" ~ ~ ~ ~ ` v.' ` ~ 11.00' . • ~ NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 33 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION, ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONEDRIGHT OF WAY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK - ~ N 28 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION; ACROSS SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF 17 W W _ ~ p WAY, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK29 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (THE ABOVE IS A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY OVER AND ACROSS JASMINE WAY): ~ ~ ~ s. o' ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ i ? ~ ~ ,,N fp ~ 28 0. ITI ~ .2149' _ ~ , ~ . ~ ~ ~ N 00'53 39 E 48.19 m N TOGETHER WITH N 00' 3'39" , ` _ W • 5 E 133;42' ~ ~ ~ e - ' ' - ~ - THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LYING BETWEEN'BLOCKS 32 AND 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, A$ ~ , L 23.21 23.00 ~ , ; tn; 0 N , , RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY; FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY 18.00 23.00 23.00 23.21 ~ ~ . ~ ~ o w ~ • ~ 18 7 ( 10 ~ , 4 ~ ~ N'~oD. " ~ p m o DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 33, RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JASMINE WAY (VACATED PER O:R. BOOK 957, PAGE 192) ON AN ASSUMED W ~ ~.r 53 39,E 56.42' 0 O .a BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEG. 52'04" EAST, 61.24 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, SAID BLOCK 32; ~ U>! ~ ` . 23.21 23.00 10.21 N 00'53'39" I = ~ ~ E THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG: 00',11" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 1,135 FEETTO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 69'-DEG. 52'03" WEST, 81.15 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9; THENCE 7.79' 35:40 NORTH 00 DEG. 01'08" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAME,135fEET TOTHE POINT OF BEGINNING. <I~ TOGETHER WITH r'p pNjO ~p ~ ~ (lip ~ t0 N ~ \ 4 O 01 0, O O ~ p W O 01 ~ s Z Z 35 p ~ 38 ~ .o , . 37 p . p . . N p - - 0 39 40 0 THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF THE ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 28 AND N ON. ON ON O N O ~p ~,p N 7.19' s s s s s A> \ t0 O tD p p rn 'o to ~ p ~ N 29, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. m m m m m ;`C.~ N (iJ ~ ~ s " 'P N O rn ~ ~ g a= ~ ~ LESS THE WESTERLY 7.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 135.12 FEET OF THE VACATED (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD) RIGHT OF WAY. ~ , W ~ : m o ~ O ~ ~ rn CONTAINING 2.2019 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 8 { ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1~1 ~ , ' TRACT A ~ 23.21 ~ 23.00' 18.00' 23.00 ~ , ~ ~ ~ 3.00 23.21 ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ 23.21' 23.00' 3 0 ' M c 0 . ~ ~ , , , ~ > ~ 2 . 0 28.21 fC0 MON.. AREA): 2.5~' - , 3:4 ~ ~ I / 7 ~ 'in y / ~ -7_ _ ~ ~ ~0~' 3'3 E` 7.4 JASMINE WAY R f~,~TO BE VACATED) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~ v' 9 g a A parcel of land being a portion of Jasmine Way (Ewing Ayeriue)Right-of--Way, ~ ` o , ~ ~ ~ according to MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded In Plat Book 3,: page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; lyifg within Section 16, Township 29 South, .3 , ~ N 0 53'~ E 143. 2'~ _ , . , ~ 2.74 ;>-I. . , _ Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as .21' 3.0 20.43 , ~ ~ 23.00' 23.00' .28.21' ~ ~ , follows: ' _ - - - 23.00 29.8 23.00 23.00' 23.00' 23.00' ' ~ 21. , I BEGIN at the Southwest comer of Lot 5, Block 28, MAGNOLIA PARK, as recorded in 3 . 2.70 00 ? rn Plat Book 3, page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence ~ N 01'34'11" E 135.12' S88°50'05"E, along the North Right-of-Way line of Jasmine Way (Ewing Avenue), ~ ~ ~ oo ~ according to said MAGNOLIA PARK (being the basis of bearings for this legal 3 W ~N p o0 00 ~ p description), same being the South line of Block 28, said MAGNOLIA PARK, for o 279.70 feet to the Southeast comer of Lot 8, said Block 28, same being the a d ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ' ~ to ..a I.O , N p m pp ~ N ~ to point of intersection with the East Right-of-Way ine of the Atlantic Coast p m c,0n = rnti rno rn~ 0~ ~ oo ao ~ jb Railroad, according to said MAGNOLIA PARK; thence S02°31'02"W, along said East o ~ Right-of-Way line of the Atlantic Coast Railroad, for 60.02 feet to the point of ~ :N 34 O rn~ rn ~ top p m 33 m 31 p ~ p 30 p . p ~ . p ~ o ~ p ' 2 p intersection with the South Right-of-Way line of said Jasmine Way (Ewing N J ON ON O"?J V O~ 2/ O~ O~ Op ~"p s .N pN 26 O 25 = z ~ .N pN 24 ~o r 23 ~ Avenue), same being the Northeast corner of Lot 9, Block 33, said MAGNOLIA PARK; ' vi ~ rn m m m ~ ' j= a ~ _ 001• m thence leaving said East Right-of•Way line of the- Atlantic Coast Railroad, ~ as ~ N88°50'05"W, along said South Right-of-Way line of Jasm(ne Way (Ewing Avenue), ~ ° b m m m m m w O ;0 0. o ~ rn ~ ~r ~ same being the North line of Black 33, said MAGNOLIA PARK, for 278.00 feet to ~ m v ~ p R A SE NT ~ ~ C C the Northwest corner of Lot 1, said Block 33, same being the point of • Q intersection with the East Right-of-Way Ilne of South Ft. Harrison Avenue, ~ 3.85 0 rn ~ according to said MAGNOLIA PARK; thence N00°539"E; along said East E 1 ' ~ 23.21 23.00 23.00 23.00 23.00' 28.2 ' ~ , ~ Right-of•Way line of South Ft. Harrison Avenue, for60.00 feet to the POINT OF ° 29 58 23.00 23.00' 23.00' 23.00' ~ w ~ _ 21.84 0 BEGINNING. o. ~ v ao D ° N 00'53'39" E 143.42' , 6 2, 00'53'39" E 143:42' " 0.48' r » , r n ' O~ 0 .Containing 16,732 square feet or 0.384 acres, more or less: W 'v N 0109 07 E 134.91 ~ N 00 5 55 E - _ s Error of closure: 0.0033 feet (LC$) - a b o 60. 0 m ~ a S 03'07 . r 28 W 270.31 24 ~ N 1 0 0~ ® 24 3 N 03'0T2g" E Edward Mazur, Jr, a ~ o g 0 0 N 'n~ / MAR 2 31Q04 IM V~ N MAGNOLIA PARK ~ ~ ~ D ~ I~ 1 I FL P.E. i~o. 2~~1i~,~C r. , D Jn ~ D MAGNOLIA MAGNOLIA PARK ~ U~ ~ o T 32 P.B. 3, PG. 43 m ~ 29 n ' coo . o P.B. 3, PG P.B. 3, PG. 43 r, ~ ~ N Q a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U c~ l., i 4-r uy ~ ~9 c ~ N N rn a N ~3'j~ ~ N DESIGNED THE SIGNATURE OF THE QUALITY PREPARED FOR SHEET DESCRIPTION, a CONTROL OFFICER IN THIS SPACE 'TION. JOB x a TN INDICATES THAT ALL REQUIRED E 69 -203 0 DRAWN PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED FLORIDA DESIGN a CONSULTANTS, INC. GWI INVESTMENTS, INC. JQE LL- EN s' TN AND THAT CONSTRUCTION IS ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS JASMINE WAY TOWNHOMES 22 F.D. 8 I PG. cV o CHECKED AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE. 2510 PROSPECT ROAD 0 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Part Richey FL 34655 SHi. r EM Tel, (727) 849-7588 Fax: (727) 848-3648 TAMPA, Florida 33629 PRELIMINARY PLAT L .L N Q.c TEL (813) 258-5240 FAX (813) 258-5241 DATE. a EM E.B. No. 7421 Y 'D 03119.104 NO. DATE REVISIONS AB ( U I ' SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE 15 E., i W.V. ~ p F.N. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ,^A, 34.0 33.99 33.5 2 W.V. ?tq PMwYb 70,39 DESCRIPTION 1~ r PARCELI 894E V.=3a ('a I~ + +J3.6D +72.79 LOTS 1, 2, 9,10, S 11 BLOCK 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN L (60' R/W) a •82 +30.92 ra~.~,~ N r'°'' ° 31.18 PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~,-,:;,e '3" SIR ~ 35.49 33:82 3~.~1 JO.7J TOGETHER WITH ~ ~ ~1 ; ~j FlR 5/8" lB 3889 34.25 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 33,77 ~ 7274 ~ 3D.77 ~i N D.02 ' ~ STORN INLET E 1,09' o t Dt 30 15 0 30 ~,.r:~ ~ 10PELEV.=34.67 ® ~ 70.46 PARCEL II LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8 BLOCI( 28, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT N INY=71.71 .84 34.26 30.83 "'„a,'9<?}' 0 , t' S INV=31.65 34.8 4.8 .31,39 ' Q' P.P. BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. L~-.z~ !!-INVr^J1, '7'+.++~•.w~ 'w 'wcw19'r"iu~.SL?:4kW'~3~ -_~,~;y SIR 7 J3S SCALE :1 -30 , . I _ 58.63 . 5 ~ 34.1 TOGETHER WITH wi 35.5 *34.2 +34.2 134.7 +34.1 +32.67 PARCEL III +74,1 DRAINAGE CONTROL 11^ I~. INV: 31A8 3218 TITLE COMMITMENT N 0 TE S E BEGIN AT THE POINT OF ; TERSECTION OF THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 29 OF THE PLAT OF MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RE~;:)T~DED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS 73.2 TOP E~.=34,15 I I I w 33.00 COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND ` TE EAST RIGHT-OF•WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF GRANTOR SLOT EIEY.=3J.1'~ I ~ 8 +322 w NE INY: 7210 I I W IP WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF A COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE BY FIDELITY NATIONAL T11LE (FORMERLYTHE ATLANT ',.COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY) AND GO IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK; COMMITMENT No: TA04-1254; EFFE CT1VE DATED ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT JF-WAY LINE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 32 OF SAID PLAT OF I I I Q J JANUARY 21, 2004 ®8:00 AM. THE LEGAL DE SCRIPTiON IN SAID COMMITMENT FOR TITLE MAGNOLIA PARK; THEN(.`: IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ACROSS THE SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF ~ I w ~ IP I I w a_ INSURANCE IS THE SAME LEGAL DE SCRIPTiON AS SHOWN HEREON (PARCEL Q. SEABOARD COAST LINE AILROAD COMPANY, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 33 OF SAID PLAT ~ 1 o W r I)I Qr` ~ F WE HAVE REVIEWED SCHEDULE B II OF THE ABOVE COMMITMENT AND OFFER THE OF MAGNOLIA PARK; TH CE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION, ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. ABANDONED RIGHT OF V: Y TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 28 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA f 7.0' T~I I z ~ + ~ +33.7 + Il r' ~ N 74.0 ~ 3 93 JJ.6 I' ITEMS 1-3. ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. PARK; THENCE IN AN EA: ERLY DIRECTION, ACROSS SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY, TO THE w W Illo N ITEM 4 : ANY ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS, MEASUREMENTS, VARIATIONS IN AREA OR SOUTHWEST CORNER OF '?AID BLOCK 29 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (THE ABOVE IS A 60 FOOT RIGHT CONTENT, PARTY WALLS OR OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY OF THE PREMISES OF WAY OVER ANDACR(. SJASMINEWAY). ~ I ~ " ~ I l m o ~ W 0 WOULD SHOW. SURVEY SHOWN HEREON. ri ~ 9. I I I +33.9 W o` ! ( ITEMS 5 & 6: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. TOGETHER WITH + 36.39 F " 1 z +34.1 76.35 1 1 ~ V I --1 34.5 + THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 32 AND 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, W ~ 35.1 27 I-- Q 3 51 34.0 2 +33.0 2 ~ 2 ~ wl +36.60 r ~,p J •1 75.3 WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF A COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE BY FIDELITY NATIONAL 111LE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE Q o (n + IN ~ J Q U 34.1 Jp INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK; COMMITMENT No: TA04-1243; EFFEGfIVE DATED PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 33, JANUARY 21, 2004 ®8:00 AM. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN SAID COMMITMENT FOR TITLE RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JASMINE WAY (VACATED PER O.R. BOOK 957, + J6.J4. ~ I I I 36.09 ! + ~ +35.82 ~ +32.9 I I U IN INSURANCE IS THE SAME LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN HEREON (PARCF:.L II). PAGE 192) ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEG. 52'04" EAST, 61.24 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST ~ I r= WI - II z Fc WE HAVE REVIEWED SCHEDULE B II OF THE ABOVE COMMITMENT AND OFFER THE CORNER OF LOT 1, SAID BLOCK 32; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG. 00'11" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FOLLOWING COMMENTS. LOT 1,135 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 52'03" WEST, 61.15 4 I Q + RIM ELEV. a J6.~7 I ~ J .2 7 ,4 34S ITI ITEMS 1-3: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG. 01'08" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE ~ 1 / TWO STORY P +34.2 Q ~ ± .4 ITI MAG11lD1,.tA PARK - rwo sT0 r MASO JI.5 74.1 +33.7 ~ MA 0 IA PARK ITEM 4 : ANY ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS, MEASUREMENTS, VARIATIONS IN AREA OR OF SAME, 135 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. sQ . ~s.2s 10• +3 . , W00 .5 / NRY 9 I ~ a C( 3 5. D F R'A ~ ~ I P.B. 3, .~'G ~ 4~3 ~e , , I a o P. 3, PG. 43 w .}.39 P. , or :FINISHED FLOOR- I CONTENT, PARTY WALLS OR OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY OF THE PREMISES WOULD SHOW. SURVEY SHOWN HEREON. TOGETHER WITH ~ 3.3! t .I tt J 8"8 36.08 , + I W ~ ITI ? (..;p•-~ Q5 'ELEV, =35,47 q A 76.27 329 + I ITEMS 5 & 6: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. 36.Pi .03 ~ ~ ~ ~3~ a,:'oJ ~ ® 36.22 a. 3:58 + 328 3 .3 I I ~ PP 36,61 '35.67 .515"t.~9 pR. 35.22 P' fenpe tle' SIR I ~ Q THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF THE ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 0.8 oif r ain I' ~ 5 1 O" " + +324 ~>.7"~..~ +JS.IB mk fe a 27" e~ o ^ I [C 33.9 3 75.'0 $ IR A. ~ b.29 `35.99 , ! , nf -50'(F) : _ 8~ f . _ 15 1 71.0 34.334.3 + --14.1+ WI 28 AND 29, MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF. A COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE BY FIDELIT" NATIONAL TiTLE PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~.xr. ~ _ r . S ~ .o a~ ~ ,.4 33.5 131.4' _ IN 35.1 ~,.p N U.DI _ P.P fenFe tie a / J` ~ INSURANCE CGI~IPANY OF NEYr" 'rDRK; :,OMMI115ENT iJv:-THD4-1r~0; EFFE!.'-rT:'E DATEC I W 0.47.. j D.M1 on I 34.5 a ggie ~Y ar ~ I .,_3s' p N 0 E S OR IN JANUARY 21, 2004.® B: OD AM. THE. LEGAL DESCRIP110N IN SAID COMMITM._NT FOR T1TlE LESS THE WESTERLY 7.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 135.12 FEET OF THE VACATED (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC INSURANCE IS THE SAME LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN HEREON (PARCEL III). COAST LINE RAILROAD) RIGHT OF WAY. ~ ~8.5~ o~ tt 36,1 FCM 4'X4: I 35.9. fen. D ' ~ ~?d.~}~,~ ten o do I ~ / MASONRY J4.o s + WI A4 i ~ 3G.55 38.3D 135 (P) D.Br off ~ + I +34.1 + + Sae WE HAVE REVIEWED SCHEDULE 8 II OF THE ABOVE COMMITMENT AND OFFER 1HE 36.4 ~ ,35as .35.89 / / FNISHED FLOOR ~ I Jas Jos F( I 9. --~.~''~,~,"W°s~° ~ / , EV. 4 I I +323 ITI FOLLOWING COMMENTS. CONTAINING 2.2019 ACRE;1, MORE OR LESS. ITEMS 1-3: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. • :J4 +36.1 + ' 4 3h.39 11" I ~ 3.88 '1 / ~ 1;4:' 15^ / ~ee I ITI I 13.5' / ® ~ / ~ r,7 .J6 17" ~ 1 ITEM 4 : ANY ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS, MEASUREMENTS, VARIAl10t`IS IN AREA OR N 0 T E S ~ s MASONF'Y wooc fence C( . o~ ! FINISHED 1"1008 / ® 34.11 3392 7. I I CONTENT, PARTY WALLS OR OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY OF THE PREMISES WOULD SHOW. SURVEY SHOWN HEREON. as.o / O 35.81 + ONE STORY J w WI I + , ; ELEV -/•.3 . 35s B"t MASONRY + a 9. ~o ITI ITEMS 5 & 6: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. n"zo II / 35.7 / a ^ FINISHED FL00 73,0 73.3 7, 6 3D.6 34.5 3Z ITI ,L a / ~~w / ~ ~ X12 ELEV. = 37.4 I ~o (F ITEM 7 : SUBJECT T0, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER 11~E WESTERLY 9 FEET OF VACATED W = ~ ~ _ - 38.33 +34.2 + 1~" Z 5 89 - ` , 35 99 ~ 20.9' / Z ~ ~ W B" + +34.9 325 1 ~ a W' (FORMERLY 1HE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD) RIGHT-OF-WAY AS CONTAINED IN 1. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ON THE MAP OF SURVEY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 8177, PAGE 71, I UBLIC RECORDS 36.38; ; 36.35. O J , ~ " O 35.. 9 I a m 34.13 Df ' ~ / ?w ~ fe BENCHMARK ~ ood 8 " WATER ELEV. = 30.15 w~ • . ,.6.08 W / 1D" +35.5 ` eck 8 10'10" I + OF PINELLS COUNTY, FLORIDA. SHOWN HEREON ARE FIELD MEASURED. FIELD BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE EAST RIGHT-0F-WAY LINE OF SOUTH FORT HARRISON, ASSUMED AS BEING N00°53'39"E. ~+~e ~ SET NAIL Jp. ~ Jas J.D O ~ IN ASPHALT , X:; 9• ..6~ c^- . , ~ 15 - 34.7 2. NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED ELEV. 35.38 1 3os + ^ i 35.5 I 73.9 34,0 + 33.9 -135'(e) .R_ 7" 8" 5^ g^ n / Z I 33.4 2~ 74.53 35.8 ® 5, SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ® o Q+ ~ _ I 23 J ~ ~ w 326 3. NO EXCAVATION WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY ^ . 5:9 . 96 . 3J. 35.55 i 5. I ~ ~ A . , 3 2 74.99 a / tL ~ a ~0 I v ~o I . UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, ENCROACHMENTS, IMPROVEMENTS, STRUCTURES OR FOUNDATIONS. 11.6' ~ n O II 11 ` ti Z 2" I I . / I J4.D9 W Qy < ~ al L E G E N D UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINE LOCATIONS (IF SHOWN HEREON) ARE BASED UPON UTILITY PROVIDER ATLASES AND VISIBLE FACILITY EVIDENCE. THIS UTILITY LOCATION METHODOLOGY MEETS THE o " 41 z ~I~ m f1. d YG ~ I - ~ ~ ~ T a C I ~ TVLf. ~ ~ ~ 4 35.30 35.19 34.53 34.07 - " v~. I 1:V.M. 4 = UNDERGROUND CABLE IELEViSIAV MARKER ~R= UNDERGROUND TELEPHDNE PANT MARK REQUIREMENTS OF A QUALITY LEVEL C AS DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. .5q 357 a TWO TORY ~j +35,11 z ~ I I N r.ve, LP. 35. I : ~ ~ ; 38A2 ~ a / J3. - w / 1 a .n MASONRY 3. J 32D~` I I W P.P. , I:V.B, q = CABIf lElf NS1aV URUTY BDX 1;U.B, U.iM. = APPROXIMATE LOCATION ~ UNDERC1i0UND UTILIZING THIS METHOD IT IS NOT UNUSUAL TO FIND THAT 15 TO 3C PERCENT OF THE a - I & O.H.L -ns`y FINISHED FLOOR 3DS ' ~ • 3, ss 133.0 +32.4 P.P. p' =POWER POLE -~-T iEIEF1TONE CABLE wI1H lElEl'iKXJE UINJTY BOX UNDERGROUI~J flLfTIES ARE EITHER OMRTED OR ARE PLOTTED TWO FEET OR MORE IN ERROR. O.N.L -nr-~r- = 06ERHEAD ONES UNDERGRWND TELEPHONE CATTLE wARMNG MARKER 0 ELEV. - 36. ~ 34.1 x ~ I I N„ GP. - DO 34.1 ~ + 3, 11 1320 v I , CP, p' = COMITINAnON POLE (POWER/PHONE/CABLE T.V.) TP. ~D' =TELEPHONE POLE 4. RE-USE OF THIS SURVEY FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN WHICH IT WAS INTENDED WITHOUT WRITTEN V.? '!.(55.57 ~ E C R r I O N -y 37.99 S ORNE o SW CORNEk LP.' LP. = UCHT PIXE FO.M. q = UNDER(2TWND FIBER a°BC Uh'~ wARNMC MARKER ~ CLP. a = COMBINAnON k UCAi POlE f:H. ~ ~ UMDERpTO[TND FlDER a°BC UhE PAMi MARK VERIFICATION, WILL BE ATTHE RE-USERS SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. P.P. ~'n > 5:56 ^ / / 34.87 34.71 34.14 i~ BLOCK 28 ~~122 jq 9'8 ~•6 74.2+34.2 BLOCK 29 GLP., d~ 1 3 ,65 'I 12" JJ. I + 10" ~ + .Z2 3 55 . ' 135'(~~ 50' P " + .2 6 I I 6 F34.9 +34.8 GP.. I ~ V ~ --~n"~= APPRObMATE Locanav or• uNDERr~ouND WATER. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO GNE ANY RIGHTS OR BENEFITS TO ANYONE OTHER GP, A~ - CUY ~ W ,L UNE wI1H FlRE HIDRANT, wAn:R VALVE & METER THAN THOSE CERTIFIED T0. r ' ' .:.H t 50 P 73.8 44.T P 16 M.P: `SIR GLP ~ • P 35.63 ~ . J.~® 10" ~ 8 f +35.1 en - M.p; p' =METER PIXf ~ =WATER UNE PAiNT MARK FP ~ 1 ~ ~ P.P, 0. on Y I AS .RLY (L) E-- 0.1 35A S I R N 35.44 35.28.. ^ ' . , a ::35.05 4 r8 74,55 ~.5 GL • , J3. 6 + 3,69 7" E--- =GUY wlRE R.w'V,,N RWL ---Li-= APPROk1MAlE IOCAnON OF UNi?ERCROUND REUSE wAiER wt uNE, REUSE wAffR VALVE 3 METER 5. ALL FOUND POINT::, ARE UNMARKED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. E D. 4' 35 iS:.': .462. 32,BG 32. ~ I I ~ I 35~.~ ' ~ 74.84 4,57. -3449, a82 ~ R/~4 VACATE W. J3. 8 ` I Q =ELECTRIC URUIY BOX (TRANSFORMER) =REUSE wA1ER LINE PAINT MAFf( = UNDERCRWND POWER PLANT MARK = B' CHAIN UNK fENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 6. THIS SURVEY IS NUT INTENDED TO SHOW THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY JURISDICTIONAL, ® - Rig ELEV. JSaJ ~55.33po . 4 , , ; q,•_ ' ~ I ~ O.R. 957, PG 192 IN Y. ~ 35.40 X4.98 }35 T 3 ~ I R ELE ~ 4. 3: 1., 3: ~ 3111' I a = ELLSCIRICAL GULLET ~ =PARKING POST OR BOLLARD HAZARDOUS OR EP'VIRONMENTALLY SENSITNE AREAS. N INV. - 3205 3 99 ~ 46 34.71 > •81 I,LEI. ~ ,~4 w I ~ 34.77 35. I .67 ' 3572 35.38 W INY ~i 33.22.. ~ J ~ w 35.73 +35.12 5.61, + ~ 0_' 75.21 ~ ~ w ® =ELECTRIC UnUIY BOX ®=PROFANE TANK 6.C • 3d 35.24t.J5.2 :.~a". „ ~8 CLAY ~,%')f~4 ....,a . 7 . NE INV;. =.3242 32.65 0 ~ LAY O Y +3 0 E INV. a 3242 +37.52 3247 z. L I ~ ~ =ELECTRIC METER cave ° _ 7. THE SITE APPEAR`3 TO BE IN FLOOD ZONE X, ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY ~4' SE INY. - 32.42 +33.09 •S • 1 N ~ 74.76. s.~. ~ 18 20`28 4 I w .87 33. 34.52_ 7427 n J3.g4 ,4 ® ~ I ~ e ~ +34.7 E = DECarAnvF LIa1T AsPH = AsPHALr MANAGEMENT AGENCY, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 125096 0108 G, -E E E = APPROXIMATE LOCATION UNDERGROUND POWER UNES F,D.aT. =FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRAI.:SPORTAnON EFFECTNE DATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 (MAP INDEX NUMBER 12103CINDIA, MAP NUMBER 4.91 34.80 34.68 34.37 - ~ 33.69 • ` 3 , ® ~ I ~ 1 W.Y, per:. a. q,• -C 37.82 3 '33.19 J .20 3:51 32 30. 30.~J0.1 + w 40 + 47 ® = MONIRIRMC HELL S.RD. = S1AlE ROAD DEPARTMENT W.V.,' 3.93 3 1 34.1 54.4 14.7 ~ 35.1 ~'W 2 35.16 35.09, 75.10 ° ~ ! - 33.05 728125 34.8 F-+~ 34 8lr 34.87. J3.JJ 3 . + 3 '"1 I Z 4.50 i34.5 .74.74 3,27: a 3J.9~ ;g 3~~P JJ.I R/W VACATE rss. ® = UBUTY MANHOLE aR. = a`FIpAL RECORD BOOK 12103C0108G EFFECTNE DATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003). POLARIS ASSOCIATES, INC. AND THE SIGNING P.LS. =PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYC.4 SURVEYOR HEREON ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS DETERMINATION. THE ® =PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SICK U3/ = LICENSED BUSINESS NUMBER AUTHOR OF THE MAP, THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, OR THE LOCAL G,' 0~ 9" 8 5^ 9" 1:76 A• 74.69 . GV, ® ® ~j, ~ dL4CY1 Stt;f a ~ 33.81 ~ FIP 1" 1 ~ O.R. 957 PG. 192 P.P. ~ ; 35 6f 8 74..4 p 9 a2B5 N 0.93' g{ INY.=29.94 LS.P., LS.B. ® = TRAFFlC SIGNAL UnU1Y BOX 0/A =OVERALL DIMENSION GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH MATTERS SHOULD BE CONTACTED ' IR~Ign 35.0+ _ 13~(P) o~ G3 5" W 0.31'$IR I WESTERLY (L) LS.P.)$( _ TRAfFiC SIGNAL POLE P.aC =POINT OF COMMENCEMENT PRIOR TO ANY JUDGMENTS BEING MADE FROM THIS INFORMATION. THE ABOVE REFERENCED MAP STORM CURB INLETS P,Qa = POINT OF BEpNNING 35.26. 7" ui 12" fen.be~ 7" 6 CI101n 50'(P) 50'(P BO" _ ,,5 ' Im fe nCC 341,41 P•P• V: .9243 ~ N 89' 2'04"E L 61.24' ~ ' ° . pe 1 tt ~ ~ ~ R/w = RICHTTE-oF WAY STATES IN THE NOTES TO THE USER THAT'THIS MAP IS FOR INSURANCE PURPOSES ONLY". ^ ~4.8+ ~ E INY, 30.31 ) J VB ®®5 1 ^ 51. t I - 1 r, 34 4.51 ~ + 0 'y BEN HMARK NW CORNER = MHERED END SECn ELEV. = ELEVAnON 8. ANY ZONING INFORMATION SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON IS BASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE 5.02 3 .51 35, + / / a5rr. .mil 1. ~ i B.IJ® P,O.B. 321 I J4. l/ d35.d9' ~ j10 35.3 34.7 +34.0 I SET X-CUT BLOCK 32 3 3 TWO STORY ~ ~ 75.13. . ' +J .3 / 1. NE CORNER I IN INLET ® = fLARED END SfCnON FlR o =FOUND IRaV ROD DURING THE PREPARATION OF THE SURVEY. THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE 4.0 / 35.2 D E D Y 5" 33. 32.4 B" I _ & " MASONRY / _ a / 33.2 + E~1 ELEV. - 3292 ® = qtA~ Mr~T F1P o = FBUND IRON PIPE GOVERNING AUTHORITY PRIOR TO ANY DETERMINATIONS OR DESIGN. .~o~ = SRXTM SEWER F1PE & MANHOLE SiR o =SET 1/2' IRAV ROD 8 CAP LR.~611J ~ j~ ~ /MASONRY ~ J4as T- , „ e 1 FINISHED FLOOR / FNISHED FL00 34.41 ts" I I ~ p s.u s,Ga F'(,'M o=FOUND GYXJCREIE MaYUMENT s.u s,Ga 9. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND EASEMENTS SHOWN WERE --caa----°-®•- ® ELEV. = 36.00 /I ~ 3221 ^ z L • V. = 35.4 34:0, p ~ 33:5 1 I w + l ` ~ _ g ~ 34.3 ~=SANITARY LINE -Cod-----®.---®=SANITARY SEWER PIPE, MANHOLE, CLEANOUT d VALVE SN~o=SET NAZI AND BRASS DISK U1~fii13 FURNISHED TO POLARIS ASSOCIATES, INC. AND ARE PRESUMED TO BE CORRECT. NO SEARCH OF R.CP. =REINFORCED CG4YCRElE PIPE FNAD o =FOUND NAIL AND DISK + ~ , ' e' I I Q 33.5 PAMf MARK v- + ~ l s / Jas / . y" 1 D. N + SANITARY UNE CM,p = CaRRUGAIED METAL PIPE P - BEARINC/1)ISTANCE PER PLAT ANY PUBLIC RECORDS, FOR EASEMENTS, DEEDS, ETC., WAS PERFORMED BY THIS FIRM FOR THE PAINT MARK pV.G =POLY NNYL CHLORIDE (L) = BEARINC/DISTANCE PER DEED DESpTIPnaN COMPLETION OF THIS SURVEY. 75.1 ~ " ~ I I I Q ~34s 34.4 ~ Z + t2 wood ste s o I D.LP, = WCnIE IRON PIPE (F) =BEARING STANCE PER FlELD MEASUREMENT 34.2 p 15" a 6 10 o I 33.6w (7 ~ Q U O L. I I a w 1 _J, , 4 D --4~= - - r - `~o'Iel M ~ 1 u ~ z V.CP, = NIRIRED C1AY PIPE ~ 10. THIS SURVEY WAS !"REPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF THREE (3) COMMITMENTS FOR TITLE . 34,78 : JS.J3.- 34.88 i5.D4 _ j 34.7 d 10" + ~ I a ~ P ? GV. G = APFRGXIMATE CCi;AnON Cf UN~RCR(WND (D) = 8EAlrNC/blST;NvE PER cstr °AD(~J INSURANCE. PL~:~~ ;~EFEIZ TO TTl:E CC'~'"1I1Tv1E~l'+" NOTE SHOW?! HEREOf~' G • U.GL GAS UNE wI1H GAS VALISE, GAS METER TYPICAL SPOT ELEVARONS 3{ 4 < 35.30; :6 1-a5.0: ``+75,1:." ,35.0 / + ` +34.5 I~ ~ , , I ® 33.1 + ~ I I Q r ~ N a a ~ cns uNE wARNrNC sIGN pF sTlowN) 11. ELEVATIONS SHOIrN HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (LAGS) BENCHMARK ~ =BURIED GAS UNE PLANT MARK RIP OF CURB ELEV, 86.65 EDCF OF PAVEMENT ELEV.96,1 I, 34.6 '...;I 32,8 ~a0 ~ em 34.3 ~ ~ I`.-~' ..1 I o w~- rs. T = TRAFTTC sla~l FLOwuNE OF cuRe ELEV. HARRIS X HAVING ,'~N ELEVATION OF 36.43 NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM, 1988. EDGE GE PAVEMENTEU:V. I. TWO STORY d 134.5 ® _ ' 7 a + ~ ~ . / •v I: 33.5 ~ I I m O ~ 1 2 ,I::~ , MASONRY P.f° ~._y,.~•~_.~.I M Q ® = MAILBOX rpp a~ CURB ELEV. 6.6 ~ CR(JND E1EV, 95.2 CaR =CORNER EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELEV. ~s.T~ zl- 12. TREES 4' IN DIAME'i ER AND LARGER HAVE BEEN LOCATED WITH COMMON NAME AND ' 35.1... I ~ 4.97 J 87 P w o FNISHED F100 34x7 Z a I `grdVe('~: E LEV. = 36.00 wood step+s +34 14.8 ~ U g ~Q z I I ° MAGi~I~J~ ARI STY = snxtr APPROXIMATE DIA,'~7ETER BREAST HIGH. SMALLER TREES, NON-PROTECTED SPECIES (INCLUDING 3.84 ~ / / 34.1 w I ~ 3,48 / / 347 ONE STORY ~z I I ~ ~ _ ,uRisolcnoNAL CIF =CHAIN UNK fENCE _ _ ~ ~ B~K ORNAMENTALS) A~'D TREES WITHIN JURISDICTIONAL AREAS (IF ANY) HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED. FIR s....:..l ~ ~ • / + ~ o , D^ I rn P.B. G. 3 IE = MVERi ELEVAnON ~ I- 1 ~ w/F = WOOD FENCE - - - - - - - - - = 1CTE OF SLOPE / CE'T1ER UNE OF DI1CH ~a3.D4 :.;lfl'3 89. ~ / MASONRY 3465 + i ~1 s . 4~ 39~2~''^: v 2,1" FINISHED FLOOR J 34.4 +73.7 + u~ia BLDG = BUILINNG -SCHEDULE 8-21n:M MAS =MASONRY O - 3.4 35A c \ / I - 37.3 w m ~5" ~6" I ~ 34.1 J .9D / \ 14" 12" / / ELEV. - 36.38 75.52 ~ ~ I + 3.46 135 (P) !^^3~.0+ FIR 5 8" 34.8 J6.W1 ~ 31.83 l`~ I I 358 I S/w = 51DEwAU( C E R T I F I C A T I O N CONC = Ca'VCREIE 34 34.00 ~ O ~ / + / .0 I 34.84 ` 35,25 ' 35.39 8^: ~ LB+ 3 89 ~ " I I +35.2 J5.fi PB =PLAT BOOK ® BUILDING OJ' 5.59 74.8 / 1\ 8" I29.0~'~ 3Js 10" / OFF PROPERTY 35.51 TWD i?DR w 18" ~ / CO ~OFt 1 ® + 35.27 / UNE WDDb .FRAME ~ ~ ~ +34.8 / ~ ~ y 33.4 ~ I I Boat CERTIFIED T0: GWI INVESTMENTS; FIDELITY NATIONAL 1111E INSURAN~iE~`COMPANY' ~ ~,~g P.P. FINISHED FL00 a 34.e+ / / ~ I ~ (sr'~T~=SEASO~NAIHiGHwATER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON I,`~~'T~, ,E~~MINIMUM',TECHNICAL 343 0 / ONE STD _ R w ~ .7 / ~ + 73.21 I I s ' . RY E lE V: - 35.00 C~ SHED +3 / ~•4 +33.5 JJ,4 s.GO. ® a / MASONRY 1 I I cov= GOVERNMENT STANDARDS SET FOR1H BY THE FLORIDA BOARD 0 PROFESSIG~1t~~I.AnW'~S~URIVEi'ORS-'IN CHAPTER 3 / +35.41 ~ 50'(P) 12" 855 FINISHED FLOOR , qq_ 1~'B'`f' • ~ ~5D' P 42.6'(P) 8 .15' (L) S 89'52'03"W ~t-FFE~NCEnEKNOwNAS ~ 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUAN TO SECI~OC~~a•7;7~)d27c~,R~IDA~.'~ E/P = EDGE ~ PAVEMENT TREE LEGEND k STATUTES. .11L ~ J ~ ~ ("1 +35.46 / ELEV. = 3 p ® aaT-'°'~ ~ 2 34,17 aDFP 5.50 88 / 1 ".74.95 + 3478 D 4" FIR 5 8 A x so " fl ; ; ~T 74.9 q ,y , t , C~ R 5 8 6' chain ? 2 ; -34.02 FCC 4~ 9 3"9°.~~ 43a 5 a` t at 1• o t n ILLEG BLE 3 89 hnk~ fence N ~ ~ 1 38. ~J I' 12' iZ" OAT( 1REE ~ Fy~ ° v ~ T9a ~ ®~l88 3~'S5 5.22. 35.43 ~ D~9 On 38 2 I IU ~ 75.41 1 I 12' 11" VNU.OW 1REE 02-D4-04 r ri ~ ~ ~ 12' 0 = 12" MU~.BERRY TREE DATE OF SURVEY JOHN WEIG a~ ~ ~ ,~',r~` +75.71 +35.41 : +35.26 34.6 12' 0 = 12" PALM TREE PRO SIGNAL LAND "~l1t~VE` , N0.5~~,~' 35.31. .34.87 I I +35.8 34.87 4.83 30.9 75.1 35.31 35.13 35,08 34.96 1 + lY 11" BAT' iREE {y°~ 2, 12'0= 12"MA;NOUA TREE PROJECT: ~`~~i,,~ i~~~~,,~'`~ 1 75.6 135.2 34.96.35.11 ~AGI?TOL.~A PARK ,r0=,2"CITRUS TREE JASMINE WAY r~] 7 1I P. el, PG. ~e3 i 1Y • = 12" EUCALYPNS TREE 1Y 12" SYCAMORE TREE i 4 3 2 35.D8 •34.92 I 12" 12" PINE TREE TYPE OF SURVEY: 4.91 1 tY 1z" CEDAR BOUNDARY ~ TOPOGRAPHIC S URVE Y 1Y Q = 12" E(A1 TREE 4 I1 6 12' ~ = 12" MA?LE TREE +35.46 +75.45 8 1 I JJ.91 +35.20 I + 35.04 12' Q= 12" WAY MYRTLE 1REE PREPARED FOR: ,r ~ = 12" DATER SPECIES GWI INVESTMENTS +34.82 I 31. 35.1 12' 4 = 12' C11'RESS 1REE 35.4 + 3D.7 70.3 12' 12" PECAN TREE 12' 12" BOTTLE BRUSH TREE 1Y Q• = 1Y CArdPNOR TREE- 7~ ,p' ~o = 12" CHINABERRY TREE ASSOCIA 1C S IIYC. 7~ l5 W +iG n . I +,~au V.,.~ +34.89 +J5.5 jr lY 1'Ll(WMMUM Wtt PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING LB 6113 +36 8 2915 S.R. 590 SUITE 17 4- 11 iF +34.98 +34.86 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33759 (727) 669-0522 DATE DATE CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB N0. SHEET DATE NO. REVISIONS 2-12-04 JDW 1" = 30' JDF 01-3172 1 OF 1 ~ SECTION °~6, TOWNSHIP 29 S., RANGE ~5 E., . w.v. ~ FH .b. Pi~IE LLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA .a4lGV ~ e ~...,1 34.0 9 1 ~t)~ i 33, 9 33. rv. a, ~ JD.39 DESCRIPTION PARCELI PoM ELEV. =33.83 . ,82 +33.68 +3279.. +J0.92 LOTS 1, 2, 9,10, & 11 BLOCK 33, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN (60' R/W) a PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~ 33,15 ~ J1.18 SIR iv JS.Q2 J4.11 32.67 30.73 JJ.82 3274 30.17 TOGETHER WITH FlR 5/8' U3 J089 3425E :35.09 33,73 N 0.02' PARCEL II STORM INIET E 1.09 • s is 30.48 LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8 BLOCK 28, MAGNOLIA PARK, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT 30 15 0 30 TOP EIEY=J4.6T ® ~ 34.26 30.83 fir'. 5 INV: 3165 J4.8 4.8 P.P. 31.39 BOOK 3, PAGE A3 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ~~:2, }~'',tS.~; t• Jli~~'*,.~n~:~.n :~v.~ N-INYr•3 ...dc TOGETHER WITH n , ~ 2 SIR 1 33.5 SCALE :1 =30 I 58.63 5 n 34.1 34.3 + ~'S 34.2 +34.2 + + 34.1 +3283 PARCEL III BEGIN AT THE POINT OF IiJTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 29 OF THE PLAT OF J4,1 32,76 DRNNACE CONTROL I r INY=31.48 I I 33.2 TITLE COMMITMENT NOTES MAGNOLIA PARK, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOT( 3, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS TOP ElE =J4,15 I I I W 3J.00 + COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND 7SIE EAST RIGHT-OF•WAY LINE OF THE ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF GRANTOR SLOT EIEY.=3J,1 I ~ 6 3z2 WE NE INV=3210 ~ I w I N INS WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF A COMMITMENT FOR TiTLE INSURANCE BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE {FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY) AND GO IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK; COMMITMENT No: TA04-1254; E FFECTiVE DATED ALONG SAID EAST RIGHi-OF-WAY LINE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 32 OF SAID PLAT OF I I I ¢ r JAf~ ' w, JANUARY 21, 2004 8:00 AM. THE LEGAL DESCRIP110N iN SAID COMMITMENT FOR 11TLE MAGNOLIA PARK; THENGI~ IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ACROSS THE SAID ABANDONED RIGHT OF WAY OF ~ I I I a INS ~ I ~ WE INSURANCE IS THE SAME LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN HEREON (PAItiCEL i). SEABOARD COAST LINE f'sAILROAD COMPANY, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 33 OF SAID PLAT WE HAVE REVIEWED SCHEDULE B II OF 111E ABOVE COMMITMENT AND OFFER THE OF MAGNOLIA PARK; THEPoCE IN A NORTHERLY DIRECTION, ALONG THE WEST RIGHT•OF-WAY LiNE OF THE r- III a ~ FOL FOLLOWING COMMENTS. ABANDONER RIGHT OF W:IY TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK 28 OF SAID PLAT OF MAGNOLIA F- I a ro 34.0 ~ 93 33.6 ITEMS 1-3: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. PARK; THENCE IN AN EASTERLY DIRECTION, ACROSS SAID ABANDONED R;'^HT OF WAY, TO THE ITEM 4 : ANY ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS, MEASUREMENTS, VARIAl10NS IN AREA OR SOUTHWEST CORNET' A,~ BLOCK 29 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (1 t1E ABOVE iS A 60 FOOT RIGHT w W I I I o n ITEI ~ ~ ~ COP CONTENT, PARTY WALLS OR OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY OF 111E PREMISES OF WAY OVER ANDACRG~SJASMINEWAY). I I I m o WOI ~ r-- 9, + Q ITE I WOULD SHOW. SURVEY SHOWN HEREON. r I I 33.9 w I1EMS 5 & 6: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. TOGETHER WITH +36.39 I-- w I ? +34.1 36.35 N ~ I -a 34.5 - + THE NORTHERLY HALF OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 32 AND 33, .MAGNOLIA PARK, _ I 1 35.1 F- O 3 5t - . 34.0 2 +33.D w M 7 rn WE +36.60 ~ +h0 J24 5.3 a ~ + INSt WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF A COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TiTLE AS RECORDED IN PLAT B<~OK 3, PAGE 43, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK; COMMITMENT No: TA04-1243; EFFECTIVE DATED PARTICULARLY DESCRIBEU AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 33, 1 ~ g 7"" 0 34.1 JANE ~ 0 III ° JANUARY 21, 2004 ®8:00 AM. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTTON IN SAID COMMIT1r1ENT FOR 111LE RUNNING THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JASMINE WAY (VACATED PER O,R. BOOK 957, +36.34 + 08 +35.82 ~ 1NSl J6,09 + I I U 32.9 I ~ WE INSURANCE IS THE SAME LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN HEREON (PARCEL II)• PAGE 192) ON AN ASSUMLU BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEG. 52'04" EAST, fi1.24 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST WE HAVE REVIEWED SCHEDULE B II OF THE ABOVE COMMITMENT AND OF'-ER THE CORNER OF LOT 1, SAID i3LOCK 32; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG. 00'11".WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID z Z t t III a FoL FOLLOWING COMMENTS. LOT 1,135 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG. 52'D3" WEST, 61,15 34.2 1.4 +34.5 ITEM RIM ELEV. - 35.37 TWO STORY I +341 a ~ + ,4 ITEM _ /~t'~GN01,•.!~~ PAI>'K , Twa sTO Y M 31.5 34.4 +J3.7 ~ MA 0 IA PARlf ITEMS 1-3: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST :;ORNER OF LOT 9; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG. 01'08" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE ASONRY ~ CON ITEM 4 : ANY ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS, MEASUREMENTS, VARIA110NS IN AREA OR OF SAME,135 FEET TOTH~" POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTENT-, PARTY .WALLS OR OTHER FACTS WHIC!i .A COfZf?~.CT SURVEY. OF THE PREMISES n ~ ,z _ 3s.t:i~ tn" . + :.~90UD, FRn / ' I ~ p J5„9 19 P t''.:~9: v x~° ia': 4,3 I a o . 3, PG. 4~ wou ~ ® e» r n FINISHED Fk00R 36,ae II wa ITEN WOULD SHOW. SURVEY SHOWN HEREON. TOGETHER WITH ~ J .J4 r ~ n S 8 50 05 ELEV. = -35,47 n 36.27 +329 + I ~ ? .03 ~ ~ J6.22 ,58 + 32.8 J . I I ~ ITEMS 5 & 6: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. 36,~ . ~ ~ 01 o t ~ J 9 . ~ E 35.67 .5154.29 PP J6.22 36.81 a tanEe tle . 5 + ( ° C P.~• G C; D,e orr SIR 3+1 aD" " k +3a9 +3z4 THAT CERTAIN PARCEL U. THE ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LYING BETWEEN BLOCKS 28 AND 29, MAGNOLIA PART(, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 43, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF I 24.1.96 +JS.16 ham Irnk fe e 27" . V . t5 1 " ~ `-'a 6,70 SIR 3 X5.29 35,99 iy 5D'(P _ _ 31.0 34.JF + WE WE ARE IN RECEIPT OF A COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE BY FIDELIT'( NATIONAL TiTLE PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORi~aA. FCM 4"x4" r` 20" .4 34.J +33.5 + INSI 3~.3 i 34.4 3637 N O.DI' P•P tenge tie m 34,5 e g(e JANI INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK; COMMITMENT No: TA04-125D; EFFECTIVE DATED JANUARY 21, 2004 ~ 8:00 AM. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN SAID COMMIITIENT FOR TITLE LESS THE WESTERLY 7.0 FEET OF THE NORTH 135.12 FEET OF THE VACATED (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC 35 1 W 0.4T., / D.4 on / 1. oh 3c.; . a 4 ' x-3.8 N %0 E S OR INSI ` r FCM 4'x4 I INSURANCE IS THE SAME LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN HEREON (PARCEL III). COAST LINE RAILROAD) R,3HT OF WAY, ~ S 88 SO:~J ~ I+3s.11 / / MASONRY 34.D + WE •I fen .t( C a^'~ tenlro tle I + + J3.8 ass. ~ se X55 135•t~} o.e otT / FNISHED FLOOR + ~ I J4.1 als + FOLI WE HAVE REVIEWED SCHEDULE 8 II OF THE ABOVE COMMITMENT AND OFf'ER THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. CONTAINING 2.2019 ACRE.', MORE OR LESS. 36.4 ' a 3ft10 35,89 / 34.6 + + q. EV. 4 0 I I 3z3 ITEN ITEMS 1-3: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. • 3,J4 9" 36.1 + J4.J9 11" I ITEN J.e6 / , N ,510'~X 1~ ~.as. I I ITEM 4 : ANY ENCROACHMENTS, EASEMENTS, MEASUREMENTS, VARIATl01dS IN AREA OR N O T E S 13.5 / ®s" MASONRY ® oo fence n" ~ CON O ~ / w ~ 34.12 3J.92 7" I I w WGU CONTENT, PARTY WALLS OR OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY OF THE PREMISES WOULD SHOW. SURVEY SHOWN HEREON. - s6 / ~ ° INISHED f LOOR 35.81 + ONE STORY eJ z~ ITEN +3 ta: ~ n ELEV/~_,~`,$: J5s 6"t MASONRY + +33s + 6"10" 9. ~o ITEMS 5 & 6: ARE NOT MATTERS OF SURVEY. ° ~ +35.7 / 33.6 J3.J 30.6 34.5 w ITEN ~ a o 11 vtz" FINISHED FLOO T s ~o FOf ITEM 7 : SUBJECT T0, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER THE WESTERLY 9 FEET OF VACATED (FORMERLY THE ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD) RIGHT-OF-WAY AS CON' MAINE D IN 1. UNLESS OTHERWIaE INDICATED, THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN ON THE MAP OF SURVEY 4' a w / / ~ ELEV. = 37.4 + 1 • I ~o ( ,.y., ~ z j ~ ~ 38.33 34.2 + ~ r z WAR WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 8177, PAGE 71, ! UBLIC RECORDS 89 . 35.99 ' ~0 u~i 20.9' / Z ~ ~ w B" +35. +34.9 -7 J25 Q" I Q m 34.13 OF ~ 5. 36,38 38.35 O Z J ~ ~ / ~ f ¢ ' Q / _w 16" 10" BENCHMARK ood WATER ELEV, = 30.15 w., OF PINELLS COUNTY, FLORIDA. SHOWN HEREON ARE FIELD MEASURED. FIELD BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH FORT HARRiSON, ASSUMED AS BEING N00°53'39"E. ' . s.oe w + e e"1o'10" I + ` ~ 3s5 SET NAIL ck ~ ~ 33.s +JS.e .oi p ~ ' IN ASPHALT , x.: +34T .64 t5' ELEV. = 35.38 I 9+ 2. NOT VALID WITHO'J TFiE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MFiPPEfL » 35.5 8" I 30.6 33. 34.0 +33.+ 33'8 ' , T" 5" t 3F'(p) A + S_ 7" 5" 6" n Z I 2 LI. 34.53 J5.8 ~ ® 6 ® 5" p ~ I w • ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~a + 1 I 23 3. NO EXCAVATION Vu~S PERFORMED TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF AIdY ~ w 9 .9fi J . .35.56 JS. 2 34,99. ~ ~ ~ Z 326 I r- ~ a IL ~ a I I UNDERGROUND Ui-' 'TIES, ENCROACHMENTS, IMPROVEMENTS, STRUCTUR[S OR FOUNDATIO^1S. a: 1n Q II n H Z ,~I 2"I I 11.6' n 34.09 / W N¢ ~ 0 L E G E N D UNDERGROUND U1 i.ITY LINE LOCATIONS (IF SHOWN HEREON) ARE BASED UPON UTILrrY PROVIDER ATLASES AND V1S113LE FACILITY EVIDENCE, THIS UT1LIlY LOCATION METHODOLQGY MEETS THE w ~v ~ I i 0 T,Y.M• 0 = UNDERGROUND CABLE iEIEHSIAN MARKER fin= UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE PANi MARK REQUIREMENTS C;= A QUALITY LEVEL C AS DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL HiGhll~AY ADMIPIISIRATION. 35.72 ~ a n` / J5.3D 35.19 J4,53 34.07 Z J w I I N EY& LP. 5.50: 3G.p6 36.(12 ~ TWO STORY 5 +35,11 33. -w I P.P. JD' LY& ~ = CALTLE' iELfNSI(bV UnUIY BOX r.UD, UT.M. = APPROXXIMAIE LOCAnON ~ UFNTERCROUND UTILIZING THIS METHOD R IS NOT UNUSUAL TO FIND THAT 15 TO 30 PERCENT OF THE p,p fy = POKER POLE _O~T 0- iE[EPHONE CABLE NIlN 1ELE1T10NE UnUIY BDX UNDERGROUND U e:'_ITIES ARE EITHER OMITTED OR ARE PLOTTED 1W0 FEET OR MORE IN ERROR. 35.1 MASONRY 3 J2D~ I I lU O • / FINISHED FLOOR a D.H.L -~-~s•- O.H.L -~r--»r- =OVERHEAD UNES UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CA61f NARKING MARKER / J.89. ~ a 66 +J3.0 +324 I ~ a 3 ,1 ~ I CP. ~Y ` ~w , ELEV. = 36.00 ,0 34,1 x \ 47 +JZO ° I LP. CP. p' = COMBMAnAN PIXE (PONER/PHONE/CABLE LY) T.P. = iEIEPHONE POLE ~ 4. REUSE OF THIS SURVEY FOR PURPOSES OTHER THAN WHiCH IT WAS INTENDED, WITHOUT WRfTTEN LP. A' = UC~1T POLE F.OwG 0 UNDERGROUND Fl[1ER OP11C llN.: WARNING MARKER ® 5.57 / 33.99.: SE CORNER -o I ~N SW CORNER ~ ~H• UNDERGRWND IjBER OPTIC UHF. PNNr MARK VERIFICATION, WILL BE AT THE RE•USERS SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY TO THE SURVEYOR. C.LP. A' = COMBINAnON d tfGNi POLE w~ M,~OJOMAiE LOCAiIGY A~' UNDERCJtWND NA1ER N01TiING HEREIN SsiALL BE CONSTRUED TO GNE ANY RIGHTS UR BENEFITS TO ANYONE OTHER ~ _5:561 ~ r, 34.67 ' 34.71 34,14 i+> BLOCK 28 ,122 3D 9.8 30.6 341+34.2 t•-Q BLOCK 29 C.LP. A 33. t + GP. 1Y P.P. 3 .65 12" a +J 1 0 ~6 I ~ .6 + +J4.8 .22 3 55 ' 135' P + I. I • Q 34.9 GD.1~ = GUY ~ NL UNE NI1H FlRE HttTRANr, NAffR VALVE d METER THAN THOSE CERT" TED T0. 50' P • 50 P 3J.8 44.T P ~6 IA.P. ~ y 4 ' ~ .fl' CLP. 9 1D" ~ +35.1 er c$ aa 35.63 2 •70 6 AS RLY l Mp =METER POLE ~ = HATER UNE PAMrMARK F~PII ~ N ' .9 P.P. 0. on I SIR N 0.1 J5. 35A4 4518. ^ ::35.95 4K6 34. GL . " 9. 7" ~ ~ E--- = CUY WIRE -~--RWL -~F--= APPROxIMAiE LOCAnON OF UNDERGRIXIND REUSE NAiER 5. ALL FOUND POINTS ARE UNMARKED UNLESS OTHERIMSE NOTED. = fIECiTNC URUiY BOX (TRANSFORMER) NL UNE, REUSE WRiER VA1YE d METER a • r' ':34.55. 3, 5 +J .6 ? 3 .62 2,86 2 4 ® I R W VACATE jj55 J,82 ~ ~ F E'D.-4' JS:~ ~ i,S:.•: . ' J4.84 ,x,51 `;34.49 w ~ 33: .e ~ I Z ~ 0. , 957 PG 92 ~ ~ =REUSE NAIER LINE PAMrMMI; =UNDERGROUND POKER PAINT MARK = B' CHAIN UNK fENLF UNLESS OiNERNISE NOTED 6. THIS SURVEY I;.~ iJ~' IN s ENDED TO SHOW THE LOCATION OR EXISTENCE OF ANY JURISDICTIONAL, 5.3D I R 1 ' RIM ELEV -.3513 3g 33~ ~ ~ ' ~ ® 34.98 ~ 1. m I ~ PoM ELEV, 35 ~ _ II al~ I ~ 34.17 ~ = ElECiRICAL ql nEi s = PaRIaNC Posr ae BouARD HAZARDOUS OR EPA. ]RONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS. Y INY.' s 3205 3 99 ~ 4, 34.J7 J .81 - 3312 w ~ w ~ ' ~ ~ 'CN MIN ~4 _ ~ 35. 135.3) + .67 5.72 35:78 ~ = ElEC1RiC U11UiY BOX ®=PROPANE TANK ~ r Q pp 35.72 ~ : 3521 0 5.6 ,~35.2'1~.151 8 CLAY :.„94 +3. 7 _ NE INY, = 3242 3265 0 ~ 6"CLAY , Y' + 0 E INY. m J2.42 +33.52.. 7247 " I a N N p , SE INY, .3242 +33.09 .SiB 20 28 1Ii w ~ ~ =ELECTRIC METER cwG ` n = 7. 111E SITE APPEAR: ~ 0 BE IN FLOOD ZONE X, ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY = DECORAnV£ ucxr = asPllui MANAGEMENT AG, 'CY, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUP.9BER 125096 0108 G, 9 ~ ` J4.76 34.54 n J,y4 ® ® I ~ • + -E E--_ 7 3 . 4. 2 34.21 ; .33.69 4 ~ ~ i 34.T E---~- = APPROJOMAiE COCAnON UNDERGROUND POKER LINES F.D.O.i = FLIXIIDA DEPARiMENi OF nTAN.iPL,4TARON EFFECTNE DAiS S 'TEMBER 3, 2003 (MAP INDEX NUMBER 12103CIND1A, MAP NUMBER i J4.80 ,14.68 ,_34,37 310; Z,7 32 30. + ~ ~ ~ .7 k'.Y, ' a 3J 82 :33,19. ~2.5~ J0.~.7 34.1 34.4 + R•/ 293 J 1 47 ~ J5.1 ® = MQVIRxtING HELL S.R.U = S1AiE ROAD DEPARiMENi o,R. = OFF1gAL RECORD LIaoK 12103C0108G EFFE+ i NE DATE SEPTEMBER 3, 2003. POLARIS ASSOCIATES, INC, AND THE SIGNING ® = UnU1Y MANHOLE P.LS. = PROFESSIA1~AL LAND SURVEYOT' SURVEYOR HEREO+! ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS DETERM!NATlON. THE `J3.05 9',V.' ',Y, 2 • T . s ~ 33.3 3281 2 32. 348 ~ J5.36 J5.09, 35.10' 348 J4.8T• 4.56 X34.5 .34.J4` 3 P7 •a ~ 33pp~55 + R V ACATE ® = PEDESiR(AN CROSSING SIGN (B/ = ucENSED Busm'ESS NuMeER ; AUTHOR OF THE Mf'1P, THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY,MANAGEMENT AGEPdCY, OR THE LOCAL -T- G.V.. ~ Dod 6 5" ~ 4d6:e•74,69 33. 2 328 331 t ~t V T,S.6. ® ® 91" ® dumpster . y~ 3J.er ~ O.R 7, 2 rs.P.J~( Ts.e. ® = iRAFFTC sIa•TaL unuTr Box 0/A = OVERAIl DIMENSION ; GOVERfVMENTAI A~"'ENCY HAVING JURISDICTION OVER SUCH MATTERS SHOULD SE CONTACiI:D rS.P.~( _ )RAFftC SIGNAL PIXE P.D.c. ° PL>iNr aF OYMlMENCEMENr ; PRIOR TO ANY JUC_ `RENTS BEING MADE FROM THIS INFORMATION. THE ABOVE REFERENCED MAP P.P. 8 4.1; , ; . N 0.93' S INV: 29,84 ` :35.2• IR i n " 35.0+ 135' P ~ 7" 5" W 0.31'SIR I WESTERLY (L} 5?j~gM.-(~1R[nZJJ't~ P.O.& = pgNi OF BEpNANNG 1' 9 T - 412 fie1100~ , 7" 6 chDln 5o'(P 50 P BD' . .L._I 75.28. IInI~ fence 3 41 - P•P• ' V. 92 N 69' 2'D4"E L 61.24' n ~ Q ~ ~ ~ _ ~cH~rF-oF-NAY , , .STATES IN THE NO:.;5 TO THE USER THAT'THIS MAP IS FOR IPISURAPdCE PURPOSES ONLY". • n ~ • 4 as ~ ','S / 34.8+ ~3q5 N E INV.=30.J1 43 P) '\.J S 88 O ~ ~ 1 34.54 4,5'd ~ + I O5 ~ is I BENCHMARK NW CORNER J 51 ' + 2 / 8.~~ P.O.B. 3z1 !-1 =MITERED END SECn ECEV. = ELEVAnON ~ 8. ANY ZONING INFOR ,ATION SHOWN OR NOTED HEREON IS BASED ON INFORMAT1ON AVAILABLE 35.02 35:1 510 + 3 6" / 34.3 3S 49 p ~ ~ X34.0 I SET X-CUT BLOCK 32 34. g t. , ® 35i13 + + NE CORNER I IN INLET ~ = FLARED ENO SECnON FlR o =FOUND fRON ROD DURIPIG THE PREP:. tAT10N OF THE SURVEY. THIS INFOR59AT10N SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE ® = CRAZE INLET FlP o = FIXIND IRON PIPE ~ GOVERNING RUTH.. ,TTY PRIOR TO ANY DETERMINATIONS OR DESIGN. .8] 34.0 TWO STORY / J3 5" 33. 6"I ~ ,.J5.24 !a a MASONRY a 0 E 0 Y 331 3z4+ ~1 ELEV. = 32.92 = S1DRM SEVER PIPE k MANHOLE SIR o = SEr 1/2' IRON ROD d CAP LD.TS113 / MASON ~ 34.as ' ~ , b e" FINISHED FLOOR ~ ~ * RY J4'i1 19• I I I- s,v s.c.D. ~ 1 - ~ ~NISHED FL00{~ _ T J22 z 0 S GO fCU o=FOUND CONCRETE MUWd1ENi~ 9. UNLESS OTHERWI' : INDICATED, THE PROPERLY DESCRIPTION AND EASEMENTS SHOWN l±4ERE pa1-----®~®= SANITARY SEVER PIPE, MANHOLE, CLEANOUi d VALVE SN~o= SEi NAft AND BRASS DiSK [Bd{lii 1J ' ELEV. - 36.00 _ / V. = 35.46 34.0 315 ® I t " I w + L RI - - ~ ~ 34.J + =SANITARYtk4E Ci OC) R.C.P. =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE FNim o =FOUND NAIL AND DISK F1aRh~tSHEO TQ ?IS ASS;'CIATFr, !P;C. hayT~ ^!TESU":'!~!? T(? nl= ~nRodF!;T n _ ~ . -r_ aNirARY tF~E _ _ AN i'1'UBI.IC RECC ` S FUFt Ef~'+E[11Et~TS D~cEOS, ETC'-, ~"dAS PERFORMED BY THiS FIRM FOR THE . 5^ / + / I _ . e I ~ w _ J3.5 PAINT IAARK UNr MARK CM,P.= CURRUGAIEU METAL P1Pf {P) = BEARWG/bISlM1CE PER PLAT ' ' P.v.G = Par yNn aILDRiDE COiNPLETION OF T! 5 SURVEY. + ® 16 / JJ.9 / 9" 10" I Q +34.4 • w P 35,1 ~ I ~ I I 34.6 Z~ D. +~2 12" wood steps a s'1D" o° I I ~.sw~ ~ ~ ~W y,, (L) = BEARING/bISTANCE PER DEED f~ESfFlPnON D.LP, = DUCnIf IRON PIPE (F) =BEARING STANCE PER FlELD ~~!EASUREMENi _I " 15" _ in " ' N I w 0_ Z V.C.P. = NIRiFlED CLAY PIPE ~ 10. THIS SURVEY WAS IEPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF THREE (3) COMMITMENTS FOR TITLE G -~-0 = APPROxIMAIE LOCAnON CF UNDERCRCUND (C) = BEARING/bISFANCE PER CALLAIIADON INSURANCE. PLEAS•~ REFER TO TfTLE COMMITMENT NOTE SHOWN HEREON. ___J4J.~0.. - 6 5 P --~J ~ 9Fb~@(" I I O o ~o -~--G -L~- ' 34.18 35.33 "34.88:: 5.04 _ _ 34.1 ..'I +33.1 I ? r o ti Z U.GL CAS UNE NIiN GAS YALVf, CAS METER 1)T'ICAL SPOT ELEVAnONS 35.30 pp I-.0 ~ : 35.6 + I ® I o W ¢ 34 4 34.6 ~ ~ 32.8 ~ ut w~ d GAS UNE WARNING SIGN (!F slTONN) 11. ELEVATIONS SH01'. T HEREON ARE BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) 81rNGHMARI{ = BURiEO CAS UNE PAINT MARK LDP Of CURB ELEV. 96.65 EDGE OF PAVEME Nr ELEV. 9fi.1 I;~ 34.3 11 I~ 39. 'I I I TWO STORY + ® a+ a I ~ o T.S.T = iRAFF1C SIpJ EDfO~NL~EPC~(YJRB~ E ~ HARRIS X HAVING AP! ELEVATION OF 36.43 NORTH ARRERiCAN VERTICAL DATUM,1988. ~ = MAILBOX ~ CROUI,w EIEV, 95.2 I. 34.5 I • 3J.5 I 1 ' 2 / MASONRY P. 31.Y,.~~ ~9. p a tXR = LxXWER a` EIEK ~s.~~ cROUi'D ELEV, s5a.}. 12. TREES 4" IN DIAMETER AND LARGER HAVE BEEN LOCATED WITH COMh90N NAA1E AND EDGE Q~ PAVEMENT EIEV, g, I.'.."... ^ ~ 497 34.87.. w o S'. • •35.1 ~ FINISHED FL00 2 34.91 Z,., o s~ _su~Rlsolcnava APPROXIMATE pIAMrTER BREAST HIGH, SMALLER 1REES, NON-PROTECTED SPECIES (1NCLUDiNG °I':::.•'- [dVe1 _ oad Steps + 4.6 1 p 9 ~o z I I o w MAGNOL ARl 9 ELEV. - 36.00 347 34. w I o e- O 3 .Ba ~ z CLf =CHAIN LWK fENCf _ ORNAMENTALS) AND TREES W11TiiN JURISDICTIONAL AREAS (IF ANY) HAVE NOT BEEN LOCATED. IE _ INVERT ELEVAnON -T 1'- Y! T = ~ ~ BANK 4B f..:.:':''•^•.•.. ~ 34.7 ONE STORY ~o I I ~ ~ P"B. 3 G. 3 FIR . 'I ~ ® + MASONRY 14.&5 + ce o to' ~ , w ~5 + ~z ® ~ ~ N/f =HOOD fENCE - - - - - - - - - = iDE OF SLOPE / CENT'R L'AE OF DHgI ~ BLOC =BUILDING -SCHEDULE B-1 ITEM a3 .04, 5.16: ~ ;L$. 3 B9. ' I 3 I d' B(( 3~:2~~°:. ~ 2:1" "FINISHED FLOOR 34.+ 33T +~.3 `^m~ »I MD \ / w ¢ 15 ~B" i ~ 14.1 MAS = MA50NRY ~ - ' 3 , 9.1 ~ ~ • / \ I i2" / ELEV. = 36.38 35.52 3.. I r + S1 3.90 4 ` . 35.0 ~ 135' P 14" ~ 35.8 COD 3.46 O 34 + FIR 5 8' 34.8 36.08 ~ 34.83 i I I S,N ° SIDENAIK C E R T I F I C A T I O N CONC = CONCRETE 0• + 4.0 35.6 f 34. 3a.84 / / / L 3 89 ~ : I I + UJ 34.8 6 129. .33.6 351 34.84. 35.25 ~ 35 39 8" ~30 PB = PIAr BOOK 1 " BUILDING 0.1' .59 35.51 TWO STDR w'" ig' C01~~01't I 1 0 OFF PROPERTY + / ~ 31.4 3517 uNE ,.WOOD FRAME, ~ 14.6 9" I BooK CERTIFIED T0: GWi INVESTMENTS; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE IN5URAN~CFC+"COMP/TNY / ~ 34.6+ / / ~ I ® ST eP, aa. FINiSHEi). FLOOR . ~ ,T + 33.21 I I a (SHl = S(AI ~ALMpFNA1FR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY REPRESENTED HEREON ME~FT~''~' Tk~L''Ir11~iIMiUr~{'1TECHNICAL 3sD / ONE STORY / ELEV. =,'35.00 SHED + ---y 34.a + 13.4 rt Gov= WVENv'MENT STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD 0 PROFESS101~A!~LA~d(~S~UR EYOR~''IN CHAPTER ~ • FxA = FORMER~YxxowNAS FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUAN TO SECTIb `F~47 ~127~'• L(IDA s.cD. ® a MASONRY 35,41 ~ 31.5 I I ~ f 3 / + ~ ~ 50'{P) 50' P 12" 42.6 (P) 6 .15' L S 69'5 '0 " / 855 FINISHED FLOOR , .41 • O 2 3 w 34,i3 E~ / Flr= fEN(~ RE - 61G17-6, . r,* E/P = EIN,'E aF PAVEMENT STATUTES. " , s. ~ rth~'. t`? +3s.4s ELEV, = 35.50 0p ° gg~ 20 MBfP x,18 ~u 5,! ~ • ~ 1i" 14.95 34ae FCppA~ 4ix4" FIR 5 8 TREE LEGEND. • , ' a' : , J4.D2 'f' 60.46 Jos R 5 8 - 6 chain 43 5 > » 1 . ~ ~ ILLE G BLE 1.34.95 3 a9 Rnk fence N 9 01 38 ~ ~ 12' 12" OAK TREE 02-04-04 ~ Isr~ ~ ~ p ~ N 12' ~ = 12" VNLLC4V TREE ~ ~V 88 3 _ :14:55. 12 4 0 9'>Ori 8 21 i`I 35.3 ~ I 1 12' 12" MULBi71RY TREE DATE OF SURVEY JOHN WEIG `~~T~~'~.~`~' e 35,41 ~ +1518 +35.31' +35.41 ` ~ + 34.6 12' 1z" PALM TREE PRO S5IDNAL LAND StvE' R N0.~245;, • 12' ~ = 12" BAY :?tEE r~~ ~ ~ ~ y 4 87 35.31 :.:34.81 4.83 30.9 15.1 35.8 J . 35.31. • .35.13 35.06 34.96 I + + 12'®= 12"MAGNTLfA TREE PROJECT: ` "y ' I 35.6 35.2 34.96 MAGNOLIA PARK I 12' 12" CIiRUS TREE ~ A S M I N E W A Y 12' ~ = 12" EUCALYPTUS TREE 15.17 I . P.B. ~3, PG I I 3 12' = 12' S1CA?~fORE iRCE - - - ~ 24 J5.D8 I 12' q= 12"PINE TREE TYPE OF SURVEY: 1Y 12' CEOAfT BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHIC S URVE Y 34.92 , 1 4.91 I 12' Q = 12" ELM TREE 4 6 7 12' 12" MAPI.f' TREE 12' 4 ~ 12' wnx !lYRnE TREE PRE PARED FOR: +35,46 +35,45 8 I I 13.91 +3510. I +35.04 +34.82 ~31. 12' ~ _ 12" 01HEF SPECIES GW I INVESTMENTS 30.7 1 12' Q= 12" CYPRESS TREE 15.4 30.3 12' 12" PECAM TREE 1p' 12" BOTTLE DRUSN TREE tY 12" CAMP.+OR TREE ~ r.u' 1p' Qo = 12" CHINAJERRY 1REE ~ C,Y' ~ ~ ~ ~ J S ~C~P1 F C J ~~~l,r. u ~ +35.0 tY 6a= 12" PERSIa!MON 1REE raaw +34.89 +35.5 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING LB 6113 2915 S.R. 590 SUITE 17 +36.0 +34.98 +34.86 GLEARIVATER, FLORIDA 33759 '727) 669-0522 DATE CHECKED BY: SCALE: DRAWN BY: JOB NO. SHEET DATE DATE NO. REVISIONS 2-12-04 1 1" = 30' JDF 01-3172 1 OF 1