The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2010-07001; 27001 US HWY 19 N; COUNTRYSIDE MALL THEATRE FLD2010-07001 27001 US HIGHWAY 19 N Date Received: 7/2/2010 9:58:53 AM Countryside Mall Theatre ZONING DISTRICT: C LAND USE: CG ATLAS PAGE: 221B PLANNER OF RECORD: S -K PLANNER: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III CDB Meeting Date: September 21, 2010 Case Number: FLD2010-07001 Agenda Item: D. 1. Owner: Bellwether Properties of Florida, LTD• Sears Roebuck & Co.; Dillard Dept. Stores Inc • Allied Stores General Real Estate Co., J.C. Penney Co., Inc; Florida Power Corporation Applicant: Bellwether Properties of Florida LTD, C/O Rebecca Gagalis Representative: Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. Address: 27001 U.S. Highway 19 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development Application to permit an addition with 33,465 square feet of indoor recreation and entertainment (12 screen theater), 35,102 square feet of restaurant and retail sales and service in the Commercial (C) and Institutional (I) Districts with a lot area of 3,523,825 square feet, a lot width of 2,572 feet along Countryside Boulevard, 1,776 feet along U.S. Hwy 19 North, and 2,784 feet along S.R. 580, a front setback (north along S.R. 580) of zero feet (to existing pavement) and 52 feet (to existing building), a front setback (south along Countryside Boulevard) of 5.4 feet (to existing pavement) and 83.4 feet (to existing building), a front setback (west along U.S. Hwy 19 North) of 6.2 feet (to existing pavement) and 199.7 feet (to existing building) and a side (east) setback of 5.5 feet (to existing pavement) and 285.9 feet (to existing building), a building height of 51 feet (to top of flat roof), 63 feet (to top of metal lattice) and 5,719 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Sections 2-704.C and 2-1204A, with a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along S.R. 580 from 15 feet to zero feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Countryside Boulevard from 15 feet to 5.4 feet, a reduction to the landscape buffer along U.S. Hwy 19 North from 15 feet to 6.2 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 5.5 feet, a reduction to the foundation landscape from five feet to zero feet on the west facade, to allow more than 15 parking spaces in a row without an interior landscape island, to allow interior landscape islands of less than 150 square feet and less than eight feet in width from back of curb to back of curb as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G and a two-year development order. Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 -Page 1 of 11 CURRENT ZONING: Commercial (C) District and Institutional (1) District CURRENT LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Commercial General (CG) and Transportation/Utility (T/U) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Retail Sales and Restaurant Proposed Use: Retail Sales, Restaurant and Indoor Recreation and Entertainment EXISTING North: Unincorporated: Commercial, Commercial Office & SURROUNDING Mobile Home ZONING AND USES: Restaurant, Retail Sales, Offices & Mobile Homes South: Commercial (C) District, Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District Retail Sales, Restaurant & Attached Dwellings East: Medium Density Residential (MDR) District Attached Dwellings West: Commercial (C) District, Office (O) District Retail Sales, Restaurant & Office ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 80.896-acre subject property, located east of U.S. Highway 19 between S.R. 580 and Countryside Boulevard, consists of eight parcels and has two zoning districts and two land use plan categories. The seven westernmost parcels are zoned Commercial (C) District with an underlying land use plan category of Commercial General (CG), while the easternmost parcel of the property is zoned Institutional (I) District with an underlying land use plan category of Transportation/Utility (T/U). The Institutional zoned parcel is owned by Florida Power Corporation which contains above ground transmission lines. The applicant leases this parcel from Florida Power and only has parking spaces located on it. The property is bordered on its east side by attached dwellings (Rustlewood Condominiums); on the west by retail sales, restaurants and offices; on the south by retail sales, restaurants and attached dwellings; and on the north by mobile homes, retail sales, restaurants and offices. The subject property is developed as an enclosed regional mall (Countryside Mall) and is the only enclosed regional mall within the City of Clearwater as well as the only enclosed regional mall in north Pinellas County. The mall was constructed in the early 1970's as the commercial center of U.S. Homes residential development of the area now known as Countryside. The mall site was originally reviewed through Pinellas County and both the mall and the Countryside area have since been annexed into the City of Clearwater. The Countryside Mall site is now constrained by U.S Highway 19 to the west, S.R. 580 to the north, Countryside Boulevard to the south and a residential development to the east. Without the ability to expand beyond its current borders, redevelopment of the existing site is the only option to improve the only enclosed regional mall in the City. Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001- Page 2 of 11 A major renovation of the mall took place in 1999. Case VAR 1999-F-1008 approved a 73,000 square foot addition to both Dillards and Burdines (currently Macy's), an increase in building height to 64.4 feet, 4.4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and reductions to the required landscape. Staff has found inconsistencies and errors with some calculations in the 1999 proposal. It is therefore noted that the existing conditions in the site data table attached to this site plan have been found to be correct. Development Proposal: On July 2, 2010, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application was submitted to expand the existing enclosed regional mall as follows: ¦ Construct a two-story addition on the south side of Sears including 35,102 square feet of retail and restaurant space on the first floor and 33,465 square feet for a 12-screen theatre on the second floor; ¦ Reconfigure and realign parking spaces and aisles to maintain the current parking ratio of 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area; ¦ Increase the allowable building height from 25 feet to 51 feet (to flat roof) and 63 feet (to top of metal lattice; and ¦ Provide enhanced landscaping on frontages and entries. The only building improvements that will take place are located southeast of Sears. The proposed addition will be attached to the existing mall on the south side of Sears and will contain 68,567 square feet of gross floor area. The building addition will have a setback of 291 feet from Countryside Boulevard and 609 feet from U.S. Highway 19. No other structural improvements are proposed with this application. The proposed addition is approximately 212 feet by 167 feet and consists of two floors. The first floor will contain two restaurants and a mini-anchor retail tenant. At this time tenants are unknown for the spaces on the first floor. The second floor will be a state-of-the-art 12-screen movie theater run by Cobb Theatres. The theater will have access from the malls southwest entry via the mall concourse and escalators, or from the northwest mall entry which is on level 2. There is no direct outside access into the theater. The restaurants and retail will be accessible from the south and east sides of the expansion. Regarding the architecture of the proposed addition, the southeast corner has been designed to draw attention to the theatre entrance through the use of lattice work in horizontal bands running from the sign frieze on the first floor to the top of the structure. The lattice work is located on the south and east facades of the building joining each other at the southeast corner. Located on top of the lattice work is a four-foot high decorative grill that serves as the "finial" to the building and completes this architectural feature. A variety of coordinated materials have been proposed to create architectural interest. The smooth finish of the EFIS panels on each facade is contrasted with lattice work and the glass storefront on the east and south facades of the first floor. Within the EFIS facades, horizontal and vertical reveals are proposed to visually divide the facade. The first floor of the addition is intended to be an inviting pedestrian activity area featuring storefront windows from floor to ceiling. Additionally, the project proposes an outdoor plaza on the south and east sides of the addition to allow for outdoor seating for restaurants and a gathering place for customers. The development proposal's compliance with the various development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 - Page 3 of 11 Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules for the Commercial General (CG) land use category and CDC Section 2-701.1, the maximum allowable FAR is 0.55. The existing development along with the proposed addition will result in an FAR of 0.39. Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules for the Transportation/Utility (T/U) land use category and CDC Section 2-1201.1, the maximum allowable FAR is 0.70. No buildings exist and none are proposed. Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR): Pursuant to CDC Sections 2-701.1 and 2-1201.1, the maximum allowable ISR within the CG and T/U land use plan categories is 0.90. The proposed ISR is 0.89 which is less than what may be permitted based upon the above Code provisions. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-704 and 2-1204, there is no minimum required lot area or lot width for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the minimum lot area requirement for retail sales and indoor recreation and entertainment in the Commercial (C) District is 10,000 square feet. The existing lot area for the subject property is 3,523,825 square feet (80.896 acres). For comparative purposes, the minimum lot width requirement for retail sales and indoor recreation and entertainment in the C District is 100 feet. The lot width along U.S. Highway 19 is 1,776 feet, along Countryside Boulevard it is 2,572 feet and along S.R. 580 it is 2,784 feet. The development proposal exceeds these comparative Code provisions for restaurants, retail sales and indoor recreation and entertainment. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-704 and 2-1204, there are no minimum setback requirements for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point ,of comparison, the minimum setback requirements . for retail sales and indoor recreation and entertainment in the C Districts are front setbacks of 15 - 25 feet and side setbacks of 0 - 10 feet. Regarding structural setbacks, all buildings greatly exceed the setback requirements. The closest building to the front (west) is setback 199.7 feet, to the front (south) the closest building is setback 83.4 feet, to the front (north) the closest building is setback 52 feet and to the side (east) the closest building is setback 285.9 feet. Regarding existing pavement setbacks, the pavement on the front (west) is setback 6.2 at the closest point, to the front (south) the pavement is setback 5.4 feet at the closest point, to the front (north) the pavement is at a zero setback at the closest point, and to the side (east) the pavement is setback 5.5 feet at the closest point. As one of the most critical aspects to the success of a mall and a new theatre is the availability of free and easily accessible parking, no changes are proposed to the existing setbacks to pavement. Should the mall meet required setbacks to pavement, it would lose over 400 parking spaces. Currently the mall has 4.4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and by reconfiguring the parking the current proposal will also provide 4.4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Understanding that the mall was constructed almost 40 years ago and the fact that the site is landlocked by three road frontages staff has no objections to maintaining the current setbacks. Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 - Page 4 of 11 Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-704 and 2-1204, there is no maximum allowable height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. However, for a point of comparison, the allowable building height for retail sales and indoor recreation and entertainment in the C District is 25 feet. The existing structures on the mall site range in height from 20 feet to 64.4 feet. As discussed earlier, Case VAR 1999-F-1008 approved a building height of 64.4 for both Dillards and Burdines (currently Macy's). To accommodate the stadium style seating and movie theater operations on the second floor, the applicant is requesting an increase in building height to 51 feet (to top of flat roof) and 63 feet (to top of metal lattice). As this request is consistent with existing heights at the mall staff supports the increase in building height. Minimum Off-Street Parkiniz: Pursuant to CDC Tables 2-704 and 2-1204, the minimum required parking for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is determined by the Community Development Coordinator based on the specific use and/or ITE Manual standards.: However, for a point of comparison the off-street parking requirement for retail sales and indoor recreation and entertainment in the C District is 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Based upon the above and the proposed 1,298,116 square feet of gross floor area the site would require 6,491 parking spaces. Based on a parking demand study case VAR 1999-F-1008 approved 4.4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. The applicant has proposed to maintain the current ratio of 4.4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area by reconfiguring the existing parking spaces and aisles and by reducing in size spaces which measure 10 feet by 20 feet today to current parking space dimensional standards. The proposal includes 5,719 parking spaces to maintain the current parking ratio. Sight Visibilityyriangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the existing driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangles. The proposal was reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering Department and found to be acceptable. Landscaping; Further complicating the redevelopment efforts is the fact that the current landscape standards are more stringent now than they were 40 years ago when the site developed; therefore, the subject site does not fully comply with the current landscape code requirements. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, perimeter landscape buffers of 15 feet are required for all street frontages and a perimeter landscape buffer of 10 feet is required for the east property line. As discussed previously, parking is critical to have a successful mall and theatre; therefore, to maintain the current parking ratio of 4.4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area no parking spaces can be removed. Hundreds of parking spaces would have to be removed to meet the landscape buffer requirements. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, ten percent of the gross vehicular use area must be provided as landscape islands a minimum of 150 square feet in size and shall be designed so that no more than 15 parking spaces are in a row. While the site has 10.23 percent of the vehicular use area devoted to interior landscape islands, some of the islands are not eight feet wide, nor are they a minimum 150 square feet and more than 15 parking spaces are in a row. Again, to maintain the current parking ratio, no parking spaces are proposed to be removed. Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 - Page 5 of 11 Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building facade with frontage along a street right-of-way, excluding space necessary for building ingress/egress, within a minimum five-foot wide landscaped area composed of at least two accent trees (or palm equivalents) for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscape area. The proposed addition has two facades along street rights-of-way. The west facade does not provide for any foundation landscape areas as this side is devoted to service, loading and mechanical access areas. Additionally, this facade is located over 600 feet from U.S. Highway 19 and is not highly visible from the highway. To mitigate for reduced buffer widths, size and number of interior landscape islands and lack of foundation plantings the applicant has proposed a Comprehensive Landscape Program which includes the addition of over 250 shade, accent and palm trees, over 5,000 shrubs and over 8,500 groundcover plants. It is important to note that the proposed landscape material is in addition to over 15,000 plants that were installed when the mall addition took place in 1999. The proposed landscape material will enhance the existing buffer along Countryside Boulevard, all entrances and the renovated parking areas. By enhancing all the entrances with attractive landscaping, the landscaped entryways will be more attractive than otherwise would be under minimum code. The applicant has provided landscape materials of a greater size than required by minimum code. Specifically, live oaks and bald cypress are proposed to be three and four-inch caliper trees instead of 2 % inch caliper, palm trees are proposed to have up to 16 feet of clear trunk instead of 10 feet of clear trunk, and accent trees are proposed at 2 V2 inch caliper instead of two inch caliper. Staff concurs that the proposed landscaping will enhance the community character and will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G; the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Consistent I Inconsistent 1. Architectural theme: a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is X automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the X comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 - Page 6 of 11 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards of the CG and T/ 1J land use categories and the C and I Districts as per CDC Sections 2-701.1, 2- 1201.1, Table 2-704 and Table 2-1204: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent FAR CG 0.55 0.39 X T/U 0.70 0.00 ISR CG & T/U 0.90 0.89 X Minimum Lot Area N/A 3,523,825 sq. ft. (80.896 acres) X Minimum Lot Width N/A 1,776 ft. (U.S. Hwy 19 N) X 2,572 ft. (Countryside Blvd.) 2,784 ft. (S.R. 580) Minimum Setbacks Front: N/A North: Zero feet (to pavement) X1 52 feet (to building) West: 6.2 feet (to pavement) X' 199.7 feet (to building) South: 5.4 feet (to pavement) Xt 83.4 feet (to building) Side: N/A East: 5.5 feet (to pavement) X' 285.9 feet (to building) Maximum Height N/A 51 feet (to top of flat roof) X1 63 feet (to top of metal lattice) Minimum Off-Street Parking 5 spaces/ 1,000 SF GFA 5,719 parking spaces X' 4.4 spaces / 1,000 SF GFA) See analysis in Staff Report Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 - Page 7 of 11 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Sections 2-704.C and 2-1204.A (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use X category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off=street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and aDDroDriate distances between buildings. Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 - Page 8 of 11 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including X visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of August 5, 2010, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: . 1. The 80.896-acre subject property, is located east of U.S. Highway 19.between S.R. 580 and Countryside Boulevard; 2. The property consists of eight parcels; 3. The seven westernmost parcels are zoned Commercial (C) District with an underlying land use plan category of Commercial General (CG); 4. The easternmost parcel is zoned Institutional (I) District with an underlying land use plan category of Transportation/Utility (T/U); 5. The entire (I) parcel is owned by Florida Power and is leased for parking spaces; 6. The subject property is currently developed with 1,229,549 square feet of gross floor area; 7. The existing structures range in height from 20 feet to 64.4 feet; 8. The proposal includes an addition of 68,567 square feet of gross floor area; 9. The proposal includes an increase to the allowable building height to 51 feet (to top of flat roof) and 63 feet (to top of lattice work); 10. The proposal includes 5,719 parking spaces (4.4 spaces per 1,000 SF GFA); 11. The proposal includes reductions to all perimeter landscape buffers; 12. The proposal includes reductions to the foundation landscape requirements on the west fagade; 13. The proposal includes a request to allow more than 15 parking spaces in a row without an interior landscape island; 14. The proposal includes a request to allow interior landscape islands of less than 150 square feet and less than eight feet in width from back of curb to back of curb; Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 - Page 9 of 11 15. The proposal includes a two-year development order; 16. This proposal does not include any of the proposed signage; and 17. There are no active Code Enforcement cases for the subject property. Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal is consistent with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per Community Development Code Sections 2-701.1, 2-704, 2-1201.1 and 2-1204; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per Community Development Code Sections 2-704.C and 2-1204.A; 3. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per Community Development Code Section 3-914.A; and 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development Application to permit an addition with 33,465 square feet of indoor recreation and entertainment (12 screen theater), 35,102 square feet of restaurant and retail sales and service in the Commercial (C) and Institutional (I) Districts with a lot area of 3,523,825 square feet, a lot width of 2,572 feet along Countryside Boulevard, 1,776 feet along U.S. Hwy 19 North, and 2,784 feet along S.R. 580, a front setback (north along S.R. 580) of zero feet (to existing pavement) and 52 feet (to existing building), a front setback (south along Countryside Boulevard) of 5.4 feet (to existing pavement) and .83.4 feet (to existing building), a front setback (west along U.S. Hwy 19 North) of 6.2 feet (to existing pavement) and 199.7 feet (to existing building) and a side (east) setback of 5.5 feet (to existing pavement) and 285.9 feet (to existing building), a building height of 51 feet (to top of flat roof), 63 feet (to top of metal lattice) and 5,719 parking spaces as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code Sections 2-704.C and 2-1204.A, with a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along S.R. 580 from 15 feet to zero feet, a reduction to the perimeter landscape buffer along Countryside Boulevard from 15 feet to 5.4 feet, a reduction to the landscape buffer along U.S. Hwy 19 North from 15 feet to 6.2 feet, a reduction to the side (east) landscape buffer from 10 feet to 5.5 feet, a reduction to the foundation landscape from five feet to zero feet on the west facade, to allow more than 15 parking spaces in a row without an interior landscape island, to allow interior landscape islands of less than 150 square feet and less than eight feet in width from back of curb to back of curb as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Community Development Code Section 3-1202.G and a two-year development order, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. That, all proposed landscaping be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the theatre; 2. That all signage be permitted separately; 3. That any electric and communication panels, boxes, and meters located on the exterior of the buildings be painted the same color as the building; Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 -Page 10 of 11 4. That, should revisions be requested to this approval, the Community Development Coordinator is authorized to allow minor revisions to this approval provided they comply with CDC Section 4-406 , to include tenant elevation modifications that provide identity for the tenants by adding their tenant design criteria to the building facade; and 5. That the final design and color of the building shall be consistent with the elevations approved by the CDB. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: A. Scott Kurleman Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs Community Development Board - September 21, 2010 FLD2010-07001 -Page 11 of 11 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4553 scott.kurleman(i,myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III • Planner II August 2008 to present June 2005 to August 2008 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to. citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for no with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs, program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 -1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991 -1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983 -1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION GRADUATE - Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BS in Sustainability Management, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414. Westfield Mall property Dillard's located near the center of the mall 27001 U.S. Highway 19 North FLD2010-07001 Page 1 of 1 Location of new addition J.C. Penney located on the east side of the subject Macy's along Countryside Boulevard Sears located on the west side of the subject property Tdl> ?S R?d? b> I I, V; S r.a>u T .. ,e . ?. .? t ' 2 2 .. . .. .. e :•riY.•'.';?'•?:i ' • • °••V?Oi.?14E'?I'di?IE?' rir.:rrr. • SR 580 ATTACHE DWELLING S 21001 AT D DW 'L INGS OFFICES JQ TAIL SALES/SERVICES ERNIGHT ACCOMMODA' ONS EXISTING SURROUNDING USES MAP Owner: Bellwether Properties of Florida, LTD; Sears Case: FLD2010-07001 Roebuck & Co; Dillard Department Stores, Inc; Allied Stores General Real estate Co; J.C. Penney Co, Inc.; FL Power Corp Site: 27001 U. S. Hwy 19 N Property Size: 80.896 Acres PIN: 30-28-16-00000-410-0200 Atlas Page: 221B 30-28-16-00000-410-0100 30-28-16-00000-420-0100 30-28-16-00000-410-0300 30-28-16-00000-410-0400 30-28-16-00000-420-0400 30-28-16-00000-420-0200 29-28-16-00000-320-0200 C/o ? r U _ d •.?• ?' _ 3 WCE LR ti o c I7f.R w,' y v /^l .v.Yara, s is /J \ / Il ? ?1?' L!° 1? `u;? ? s?`m (t??\}IV'l ezo + ; .vsx aUr: 6 o, Q Gt , TyMa FARk•,i?nC R2 C '? LII A EhTER,FwsE ? ?- a 3 # o III .. "??? ? "` IIL c ? 4i 9 ilAh: d c -`? "' 5+955 T R r`?$ '. °$ .'®+ FWRTH AYE •• .. s E LL •. ,• THIRC AVE •. • ' .i $ `; . `.? MLSiazFBi Clay m '' • ' V. ST a; S • wBy. .R.E T?.l .?9isM1 .. R ?. .] ems. •?• _ •Iri#'° .'# ° .. • ??? Tu:FD-AYES .:. "; a -r` • • ®... ... ae.v w.nvaffl•_• , / . . .°...mw ®mm vmnir_ - .... .... . • 6[C:fv •YI•?•`v. .., ^ • • .•.; v. ii .?1?...wi..$.m...o..w ma.e.. ?? / ? 7 CWhCERY a o rN ' ` P '?TW.hY PL` LC ' '_-.L000RftC1( v ;?. ^ g ?maa-., . ? c creme "` # • ° • ... •. CTS GSACEh FU a 3 d 'le y^ ? IUL9 if. LOCATION MAP Owner: Bellwether Properties of Florida, LTD; Sears Case: FLD20 1 0-0700 1 Roebuck & Co; Dillard Department Stores, Inc; Allied Stores General Real estate Co; J.C. Penney Co, Inc.; FL Power Corp Site: 27001 U. S. Hwy 19 N Property Size: 80.896 Acres PIN: 30-28-16-00000-410-0200 Atlas Page: 221 B 30-28-16-00000-410-0100 30-28-16-00000-420-0100 30-28-16-00000-410-0300 30-28-16-00000-410-0400 30-28-16-00000-420-0400 30-28-16-00000-420-0200 29-28-16-00000-320-0200 y SR 580 MDR C 20001 I O M G? T y. ZONING MAP Owner: Bellwether Properties of Florida, LTD; Sears Case: FLD2010-07001 Roebuck & Co; Dillard Department Stores, Inc; Allied Stores General Real estate Co; J.C. Penney Co, Inc.; FL Power Corp Site: 27001 U. S. Hwy 19 N Property Size: 80.896 Acres PIN: 30-28-16-00000-410-0200 Atlas Page: 221 B 30-28-16-00000-410-0100 30-28-16-00000-420-0100 30-28-16-00000-410-0300 30-28-16-00000-410-0400 30-28-16-00000-420-0400 30-28-16-00000-420-0200 29-28-16-00000-320-0200 1E fL01PIDADfS/GIVCONSULTANfS, INC. Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental August 13, 2010 Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III City of Clearwater City Municipal Services Building Planning and Development Services 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Case Number: FLD2010-07001- 27001 U.S. Highway 19 N Countryside Mall Dear Mr. Kurleman: On behalf of Westfield, LLC, we are pleased to resubmit the enclosed package for the Countryside Mall expansion to be scheduled for the Community Development Board (CDB) hearing on September 21, 2010. Please find below our responses to the comments received at the Development Review Committee meeting held on August 5, 2010. Engineering Review (Prior to Issuance of Building Permit): Comment No. 1: Provide a copy of an approved health permit for the installation of the domestic water main. Before Request for Clearance, applicant shall be responsible for bacteriological testing of completed water mains and all fees associated with the testing. The health permit application can be found at: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/drinkingwater/forms.htm. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. The permit for the installation of domestic watermain will be obtained prior to building permit. However, it is agreed that other work related to the building expansion such as demolition, installation of foundation, and other building activities can commence after the appropriate building permits are obtained, but prior to the relocation and testing of the watermain, and prior to putting the line in service. Comment No. 2: Show on the plans a property sized grease trap. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 •.(800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 2 Comment No. 3: The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095), set the water meter (Clearwater Code of Ordinances Section 32.095) and set the B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device). The applicant is responsible for the water main extension from the tap to the device. Applicant is also responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. Comment has been added to Sheets 8, 9 and 10 of the Site Plan. Engineering Review (Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy): Comment No. 1: Prior to Engineering Sanitary Sewer, Engineering Storm Water and Engineering Final inspections, the applicant shall submit 5 sets of as-built drawings that are signed and sealed by a State of Florida Registered Professional Engineer. The Construction Services Inspector will field inspect as-built drawings for accuracy. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Comment No. 2: A blanket easement over all unrestricted water mains on the property shall be dedicated to the City of Clearwater. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and-hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: Acknowledged. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. General Note: Acknowledged. Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 3 Environmental Review: Comment No. 1: Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464-4422) for further information. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 2: Please provide a maintenance schedule for the stormwater maintenance system that has been signed and accepted by the owner. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Fire Review: Comment No. 1: This building will require in accordance with NFPA-1 13.2 an automatic class 1 stand pipe system and as such provide fire flow calculations, was not provided in the flexible application. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR CDB. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Stand pipe system, fire flow calculations, etc., will be provided with the building permit application. Comment No. 2: Other items to be addressed at building permit stage, separate plans and permits for fire sprinkler system, fire underground (must have a class 1, 2 or 5), fire alarm, cooking equipment, hoods and fire suppression. All work shall be done by a licensed contractor on separate plans and permits. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Land Resource Review: Comment No. 1: In April of 2000 ninety-five trees were removed for various site modifications and the site underwent major landscape enhancements. Today most of the enhancements are full grown and doing well. with some replacements of dead or declining material the site could look great again. The installation of FI grade 91 trees has proved to be a success. The trees are young maturing class 5 trees producing shaded areas for employees and shoppers to park. During my visit nearly every shade tree was utilized. It is unfortunate that nearly- 200 of these trees are scheduled to be removed with this proposal. Attempts can and should be made to preserve some of these trees. Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 4 Comment No. 1: Revisions have been made to the Site Plan and Landscape Architecture Plans after discussions with. Rick Albee. Comment No. 2: Modify parking lot islands at trees 20, 28, 47, 49, 51, 67, 89, 91,139, 140, 152, 161-166, 168, 289, 292, 293, 297, 298 and 300-302. Also show to preserve trees 210-215 and the crepe myrtles at the U S 19 entrance drive. Response No. 2: Revisions have been made to the Site Plan and Landscape Architecture Plans after discussions with Rick Albee. Comment No. 3: In the interest of preserving some additional existing trees the existing mature shrub material should be left in place as the excavation of this material will damage the root systems of these trees. The additional impacts of irrigation system modifications can affect the trees health and structural stability. Recommend preserving the healthy existing shrubs and replacing only the dead or declining material. Response No. 3: Revisions have been made to the Site Plan and Landscape Architecture Plans after discussions with Rick Albee. Comment No. 4: Revise the tree replacement calculations as nearly all of the trees schedule for removal are rated 4's and 5's. Response No. 4: Tree replacement calculations have been revised after meeting with Rick Albee. Comment No. 5: Address all of the above conditions prior to CDB. Response No. 5: Comments have been addressed. In addition to the above responses, please note that as a result of a comment made during the DRC meeting regarding "spike" holes in some of the palm trees, the applicant discussed the method used to trim all trees with the maintenance company that has had the responsibility to maintain all trees for more than 10 years. The company representative assured the applicant that they use motorized lifts and do not allow their staff to climb trees to perform maintenance work. Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 5 Planning Review: Comment No. 1: Exhibit A only lists six parcels. There are actually eight parcels. Revise exhibit to include 30-28-16-00000-420-0200 owned by Bellwether Properties and 29-28-16-00000-320-0200 owned by Florida Power. Include Florida Power as a property owner. Response No. 1: Exhibit-A has been revised and resubmitted. Comment No. 2: Pursuant to the definition of height, provide the vertical distance to the highest point of the structure (metal lattice). Response No. 2: The Site Data Table, and other related documents, now show the vertical distance to the highest point of the structure (metal lattice) to be 63'0" (the height to the mid-point of the roof is 55'1 "). Comment No. 3: Note on all site plans that signs plans that signs will be permitted separately. Response No. 3: Note has been added to the Cover Sheet of the Site Plan. Comment No. 4: Provide letters of approval from all anchor tenants prior to 8/30/2010. Response No. 4: Acknowledged. If the letters are not received by that date, it is understood that the application will continue moving forward and that additional advertising fees may be required of the applicant. Comment No. 5: The floor area listed on sheet 0 of the elevations do not correspond to the floor area shown on the site plans. Response No. 5: Revisions have been made. Both documents are now compatible. Comment No. 6: Regarding sheet LA3, live oaks are not an appropriate species to be located in islands of only 5 foot in width. Response No. 6: Change has been made. See LA 3. Comment No. 7: Sheet LA8, shows parcel 30-28-16-00000-420-0200 as interior greenspace. This may only be counted if it meets the requirements of CDC Section 3- 1202.E.1 Site visit conducted on 7/30/2010 showed this parcel and many other interior islands with nothing but turfgrass in them, some have been. Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 6 been filled in with concrete. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1 interior islands must contain 1 shade tree for every 150 square feet, shrubs must comprise 50% of the interior greenspace and the remainder shall be ground cover in lieu of turn. Revise calculations and propose plant material to meet interior greenspace requirements. Response No. 7: Both the Site Plan and Landscape Architecture Plans have been revised to exclude several areas on the east side of the parking lot. Also, the entire grassed area (0.633 acres) of the former bank site along S.R. 580 has been removed from the interior greenspace calculations. Landscape plans indicating the proposed plant material within the east side of the parking lot will be provided prior to building permit. Comment No. 8: 1999 Staff Report referenced on site data table of current application shows 5,448 parking spaces, this proposal states 5,620; 1999 Staff Report also states 10.15% interior greenspace, this proposal states 12.01%; 1999 Staff Report states paved vehicular use of 60.09 acres, this proposal states 53.134 acres. Numbers do not correspond? Response No. 8: Documentation has been provided showing that 1999 computations were incorrect. In addition, a recent count of existing parking spaces has verified that there are 5,620 spaces on site at this time. All computations shown on the Cover Sheet of the Site Plan have been verified. Public Art Review: Comment No. 1: Due to the valuation of this project at $13,500,000 the Public Art and Design Program fee will be due and payable on this project prior to the issuance of a Building Construction Permit. This fee may be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Christopher Hubbard at 727-562-4837 to discuss the fee assessment. Response No. l: Based on comments received from the office of the City Attorney, and other City staff, this fee is not required. Stormwater Review: Comment No. 1: Please provide soil analysis showing the seasonal high water table (SHWT) elevation and show that the proposed pond has a minimum of 6" clearance between the pond bottom and the SHWT. Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 7 Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 2: Submit a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit for the proposed work. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 3: Provide operational and maintenance instructions for the proposed stormwater management system signed and accepted by the owner. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 4: Show how the time of concentrations and curve numbers were determined for pre-development and post development. Response No. 4: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 5: Provide stage and storage table to show that the proposed pond has sufficient volume. Response No. 5: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 6: Submitted drainage report only has the post development analysis. Please include pre-development analysis for review. Response No. 6: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 7: Please properly depict and label the proposed underdrain system. Comment No. 7: Acknowledged. Comment will be addressed prior to Building Permit. General Note: Comment No. 1: All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each department condition has been met. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment No. 2: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 8 Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Comment No. 3: At building permit application, applicant shall submit drainage report, soil report, and any other drainage related document as submit at DRC for review and record. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. Comment No. 4: Retention/detention ponds must be excavated and side slopes sodded prior to construction of storm drains. On-site drainage must be channeled to retention/detention pond. Response No. 4: Acknowledged. Traffic Enzineering Review: Comment No. 1: All accessible parking spaces (in particular Sears lot and J.C. Penney's north lot) shall be located on an accessible route so that users will not be compelled to walk or wheel behind parked vehicles. (Florida Building Code Ch. 11 11- 4.6.2.(1)) Response No. 1: The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Westfield Countryside Shopping Mall have negotiated a settlement/agreement (DJ 4202-17-66), copy attached, that outlines improvements to both the inside and outside (parking) of the Mall. Many of the improvements have already been made, and the current Site Plan changes will address other areas outlined in the Agreement. The two areas in question (Sears lot and J.C. Penney's north lot) are included in the Agreement and scheduled to be reconstructed in 2011. Comment No. 2: For the 5' wide access route just west of the proposed building provide a line of concrete bollards to act as a barrier of protection for users of the access route running along the drive aisle corridor. Response No. 2: Bollards have been added. See Site Plan Sheet 7 and detail on Sheet 11. Comment No. 3: Provide wheel stops at all accessible parking spaces to prevent vehicles overhanging over accessible route and to protect accessible signage. (Florida Building Code Ch 11.,11-4.6.3) Response No. 3: The wheel stop detail is shown on Sheet 11 of the Site Plan. In addition, wheel stops have been added to Sheets 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the Site Plan. Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 9 7ry. Comment No. 4: On the Civil plans sheet 7 of 16, remove the signs that are in the drive aisle of the accessible parking spaces. Response No. 4: Signs have been removed. Comment No. 5: Provide a typical dimension for the parallel accessible parking space. Response No. 5: Detail has been added to Sheet 11 of the Site Plan. Comment No. 6: All accessible parking stalls and route shall comply with Florida Building Code Ch. 1 1 ADA sloping standards. Response No. 6: Acknowledged. Comment No. 7: For all sidewalks and accessible routes, provide a curb ramp detectable warning (truncated domes) all drive aisle or driveway crossings. Response No. 7: See Detail on Sheet 11 and statement on that detail noting that "all sidewalk curb ramps shall have detectable warning surfaces that extend the full width of the ramp, and in the direction of travel, 24 inches (610 mm) from the back of curb ". Comment No. 8: Proposed landscaping in landscape islands shall not obstruct motorist's sight visibility when crossing an intersecting drive aisle. Use low growing plants where sight obstructions may post a problem. Response No. 8: Acknowledged. Low growing plants are shown at all sight visibility triangles. General Note(s): Comment No. 1: Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) Response No. 1: The applicant acknowledges that Transportation Impact fees will be assessed, but believes that the rates should be "locked in" at the current rates with the City's approval of this application, pursuant to Article II, Section 150-39( c) of the Pinellas County Code. Also, Westfield may want to pursue a Florida Statutes Chapter 163 development agreement with the City to provide additional certainty for the approved expansion project. Mr. A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III August 13, 2010 Page 10 Comment No. 2: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Due to the complex nature of this expansion, Westfield requests that the City consider the following condition of approval to clarify the types of revisions that may be made to the project after CDB approval. Please note that the purpose of this condition is to clarify the revision process for both the City and Westfield. We appreciate your consideration of this condition and look forward to discussing it with you prior to the finalization of the CDB staff report. The requested condition is as follows: "The elevations submitted by the Applicant and incorporated into this Approval are examples of potential color schemes and provide the general design intent of the approved expansion/project to enliven the mall and are subject to changes based on the requirements of the future tenants. The following changes provide a non-exhaustive list of examples that shall be considered minor revisions that do not alter the character and design of the project: 1. Color changes within the same or similar color palettes; 2. Changes to surfaces or textures, provided the general appearance remains similar; and/ or 3. Changes to the fascia, bands, parapets, storefronts, etc., provided the scale is similar and the clean modern lines of the design is apparent." Thank you for your continued assistance on this project. Sincerely, Edward Mazu , r., P President c: Larry Dalton, Westfield, LLC, w/ encls. Rebecca Gagalis, Westfield, LLC, w/ encls. Scott Steady, Williams Schifino Mangione & Steady, P.A., w/ encls. FDC File No. 200956-10.01 dh - kAcountryside ma11Uetters\kur1eman.04.docx Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ $1,205 CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Bellwether Properties of Florida Limited, c/o Rebecca Gagalis, Development Director MAILING ADDRESS: 2730 University Boulevard, Suite 900, Wheaton, MD 20902 PHONE NUMBER: 240-669-0334 FAX NUMBER: 301-946-1460 CELL NUMBER 301-535-2169 EMAIL: rgagalis@westfield.com PROPERTY OWNER(S): Bellwether Properties of Florida, LTD.; Sears Roebuck & Co.; Dillard Department Stores, Inc.; List ALL owners on the deed Allied Stores General Real Estate Co.; Penney, JC Co., Inc. AGENT NAME: Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., President, Florida Design Consultants, Inc., 3030 Starkey Boulevard, New Port Richey, FL 34655 MAILING ADDRESS: Scott I Steady, Williams, Schifino, Magione & Steady, P.A., P.O. Box 380, Tampa, FL 336601-0580 PHONE NUMBER: 727-849-7588/813-221-2626 FAX NUMBER: 727-848-3648/813-221-7335 CELL NUMBER: 727-271-9001 EMAIL: emazur(cDfldesian.com/ssteadvCa?v B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: Countryside Mall PROJECT VALUATION: $13,500,000 STREETADDRESS 27001 U.S. Highway 19 North, Clearwater PARCEL NUMBER(S): See Exhibit A 80-896 ac. PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 3,523,825 SF PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached PROPOSED USE(S): Addition to Mall of 68,567 sf which includes 12 movie theaters, retail and restaurants. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: See Exhibit B Specifically identify the request (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of packing spaces, specific use, etc.) C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infll Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 1 of 8 :es - k:\countryside malkpermits\Flexible Development Application - Comp. Infill Redev. Project.pdf DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNI DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) Deeds included in package. D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit B 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Exhibit B 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See Exhibit B 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Exhibit B 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit B 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Exhibit B C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms-0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 8 :es - k:\countryside mall\permits\Flexible Development Application - Comp. Infill Redev. Project.pdf WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) ? 1. Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See Exhibit B 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See Exhibit B 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See Exhibit B 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See Exhibit B 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor, d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. See Exhibit B 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See Exhibit B C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningfonns-0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 3 of 8 :es - k:\countryside mall permits\Flexible Development Application - Comp. Infill Redev. Project.pdf E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): ? Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; Not Applicable ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); Not Applicable ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; Not Applicable C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms-0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 4 of 8 :es - k:\countryside mall\permits\Flexible Development Application - Comp. Infill Redev. Project.pdf G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24° x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including _ description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite stone-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, _ expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility _ easement; Building and structure heights; _ Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ,/ REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 '/= X 11); ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); _ Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 5 of 8 :es - k:\countryside mall\permits\Flexible Development Application - Comp. Infill Redev. Project.pdf H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) v/ LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24!'x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; _ Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and _ protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %7 X 11); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; Sight visibility triangles; ,/ REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'h X 11. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) Prepared as Comprehensive Sign Program Amendment (Separate Application) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 %i X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms-070AComprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 6 of 8 :es - k:\cou"side mall\permits\Flexible Development Application - Comp. Infill Redev. Project.pdf K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. ¦ Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. ¦ Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): ? is Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all adway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED. AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. ? ire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. CA ION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. M. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property escribed in this application. Signature of property STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINE Sworn tQ and subscribed before me this day of A.D. 20 to me and/or by .1rit LA 15A r, who is personally kaewft4ia-s- iiddeKnn. Notary public, late )I Florida My commission expires: Nota ^ Edith A Sterling Expires 0l/23/2014 C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms-0707\Comprehensive InTiil Page 7 of 8 :es - k:\countryside mall\permits\Flexible Development Application - Comp. Infill Redev. Project.pdf N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: Bellwether Properties of Florida (Limited) c/o Westfield, LLC Sears Roebuck & Co. ® J.C. Penney Co., Inc. Allied Stores General Real Estate Co. ® Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc. 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s)'6f the following described property (address or general location): 27001 U.S. Highway 19 North, Clearwater, FL 33761 W 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., President, Florida Design Consultants, Inc. and Scott I. Steady, Esquire, Williams, Schifino, Mangrove & Steady, P.A. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described properly; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (11we), the r n orjt , hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. P Aped-fly Owner Rory A. Packer Assistant Secretary BELL HER PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA (LIMITED), a Florida limited partnership By: WEA Countryside GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner By: Westfield America Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, its sole member By: Westfield U.S. Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner C:1Documents and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktopWanningforms_07071Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 04-24-07.doc Page 8 of 8 :es - 0countryside ma111permitslFiexible Development Application - Comp. Infill Redev. Project.pdf BELLWETHER PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA (LIMITED), a Florida limited partnership By: WEA Countryside GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner By: Westfield America Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, its sole member By: Westfield U.S i'ol g?, LLC/a3' ware limited liability company, its general partner By: STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) Secretary ) ss. On 2010, before me, h ni`Pi 1Ilell , a Notary Public personally appeared &gru d- pale` who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (171 ///. (Seal) ANNIE M. ZETTEL , Commission # 1794436 Z m Notary Public - California Los Angeles County Comm, 21,2012 EXHIBIT A COUNTRYSIDE MALL PROPERTY OWNERS OWNER PARCEL NUMBER DEED BOOK/ PAGE Bellwether Properties of 30-28-16-00000-410-0200 OR Book 5917, Page 467 Florida 30-28-16-00000-410-0100 30-28-16-00000-420-0200 Dillard Department Stores, 30-28-16-00000-420-0100 OR Book 9254, Page 1658 Inc. OR Book 10857, Page 2271 J.C. Penney Corporation, 30-28-16-00000-410-0300 OR Book 13193, Page 478 Inc. Allied Stores General Real 30-28-16-00000-410-0400 OR Book 6529, Page 213. Estate Company Sears Roebuck & Co. 30-28-16-00000-420-0400 OR Book 4083, Page 1112 #1415 Florida Power Corporation 29-28-16-00000-320-0200 OR Book 1518, Page 92 Prepared by Florida Design Consultants June 30, 2010 Revised August 13, 2010 I . _..._. ..?-- 4-3•59i7 ^ert 467 ' . 01 11 Chg 4r '''I«• t?airt? i : 40 Rae 2s. ad_ 8501319.6 41 DS 4 4. 1 1 " ? .:i 431st. CLEtk C. _ QNnculT cou. r? Tot I 0 t. THIS SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED, made thi8i of 25.x0 blxfflW) 1984 from BELLWETHER PROPERTIES, L.:.P.,- a :•1i mated partnership established pursuant to the;State.:of.Ne I;P rk;`:':.+'2 95 Q!?' i:.•. having an office at c/o Corporate Property Invegtorta,: Yhree : `? ' !•; .i,• Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10017 ("Grantor") to BELLWETHER PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA (LIMITED), a limited part- nership established.pursuant to the laws of the State of Florida,-having an office at c/o Corporate Property Ines- ,:;;.:i ::::• µ`'a1 tors, Three Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, New York, N.Y. 10017 ,.l is - ("Grantee"). WITNESSETH that the said Grantor, for and in Ens? consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other F? +` { valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby :::`i:'•;:;.•` acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold unto the said •?;;.?;;.:••,;;,.,.;, Grantee, the Grantees heirs, or successors, and assigns :..;!•; :: forever, all of the Grantor's interest in those certain parcels of land in the County of Pinellas and State of 3,r Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made part hereof. Subject to easements, restrictions and all other r;:;j•:: . matters of record, any and all recorded and unrecorded .?.?...?,..;?`; leases, and any other matters disclosed by an accurate, current survey of the property, and taxes for 1984 and ==* S subsequent years. ,.r:.;. r .141-=?:• TOGETHER with the Grantor's interest in all ' buildings, improvements and fixtures erected upon such lot of ground and all the estate and every of the rights, alleys, ways, waters, privileges, appurtenances and advan-' ' to es belonging or in an wa appertaining to such g any Y property ••:',; and all right, title and interest, if any, of Grantor in and to any streets and roads abutting the property to the center =?A line thereof. ?:'• ``_ TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above-described lot of ground and premises conveyed, together with the rights, privileges, appurtenances and advantages thereto belonging or appertaining, unto and to the proper use and benefit of a:_:.°??; .•: t ` the Grantee, its successors and assigns, in fee simple `•s forever. 1 (• 0. And the said Grantor does hereby warrant and will defend the title to said land against the lawful claim and demand of the Grantor and every person claiming or to claim by, through or under Grantor. ONLY MINIMUM DOCUMENTARY STAMP TARES OF 4516 ARE DUE O THIS DEED PURSUANT TO TAA $84(B)4-009. Documentary Tax Pd. 3...... T.S.....r, S•••••••• •••••...... Intangible Tax Pd, Kati c B ker e , P; las County • • Deputy Clerk Y + / ': ? ` ` ' • J•-n _ ' - ?•' .. .. .. ?Yi"l`'?'4.4"Jti?s.?x?l:4.y:i?ti5'S1':Ti•?*±: ':51-?•?.:J JYZ.'? 468 o.a.5917 •???c Gl•••r 'h •': i. i / 2 Y Y Corporate Property Investors refers to the trust- ees•under the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, .' dated June 15, 1478, as amended,-and filed in the office of 'the:Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The obligations of Grantor do not constitute personal obliga- 4: : • tions'of the Trustees, officers, shareholders, employees or ' . LK•, o•.' •' . '•'agents of Grantor. Grantee shall look solely to the assets of Grantor for satisfaction of any liability of Grantor and a will not seek recourse against such trustees, officers, shareholders, employees or agents or any of them or any of their personal assets for such satisfaction. _I : 1 P L ELLWETHER PROPERTIES , •: ' : ., . , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, B has caused, by Corporate Property Investors, its general partner, its seal to be hereto affixed and these presents to be signed, acknowloged and delivered in its name and behalf by peter T. 110111x its sident-aenoral po,amebf the date Pre first above written. BELLWETHER PROPERTIES, Grantor, by CORPORATE PROPERTY 4. 4 INVESTORS, 1 P tner by ` WITWS: ME J Y u Ur 4 . ? 7 L` • 1- ••?`4?r?s{'t?x''' .::v•.-.w...r.?i4v'.l!•??iAl?f?;i?F.3?.?'v?.?+YJ??:?T.;h'f,'r?Gi('.Sr ?,..t ,'Xc:?.r.,?`C•`4:•. -.. ,,i•..•.: ,.•, ..r:.;:,.,.... _?.... .. ?{••" ??-i' .. . = •? 0.1, 5917 ~AGE 469 9 STATE OF Vita COUNTY'' OF [//?? doe Before me, the undersigned authority personally ., '-appeared PeLer.T. Dopier, 2I , the,Viee Preaideat-aenorai Couns0f •-r•:?;a-• - :CORPORATE PROPERTY INVESTORS, general partner of BELLWETHER :Z-:;4 ; 'f: " PROPERTIES,.L.P., the general partner named in the foregoing Deed, who acknowledged that he has executed the foregoing ;;': •._:;?! Deed freely and voluntarily for the purposes therein expressed. // S`r i.L cial seal this (P?day af. !i='?,?.?•+?,??: Witness my hand and official seal th 1984 :,:.. 1h "-• .{ Y?'F Notary Pu c:S My: `commission expires: CALMMAp? - HOW' PUbft47 Yaic:... ?, },.: i `:• ?? ? * • ? NK?uawrt • ?1: a°^ 6?Inr IMaro!)iLl(L? ?'?'iiY,'..; ??ki, ` .?v4y ?N . . - .. Jy?j-•• O.A'' rare-; -•!r? 4' "TSAR ? ti+.25 • ? =.7 s, . .Jr.; : H. i?:' .. .. _a • . ,. . a, ? . `. is ?.,:. •? • . . 0,1.5917 vw 470 [COUNTRYSIDE MALL] EXHIBIT A {`.? All that land lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described as follows: Via,,, ? :.: •' ?.:;:'•`? •::. Parcel 1s Commence at the East 1/4 corner of Section 30, 4?ss Top 28 South, Range 16 East, run South 00 degrees 00 ininutes 04 seconds East, 50.00 feet along the East line of said Section 30 for a Point of Beginning. Thence South ':,• .00.degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds East; 908.63 feet along the +A East line of said Section 30 to the Northerly right-of-way line of Countryside Boulevard; thence along said Northerly sr5?, right-of-way line of Countryside Boulevard South 48 degrees 08 minutes 04 seconds West, 67.14 feet; thence worth J. •? ??:::: •.' • 00 degrees OO. minutes 09 seconds West, 648,43 feet; thence 3 South 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 second West, 742.00 feet thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 974.53 tK ai feet; thence along a curve to the right, Radius 990.00 feet Arc 95.46 feet; chord South 77 degrees 32 minutes 16 seconds ;r-••,rjs•;; ,,,? .. West,. 95.42 feet, said curve being the Northerly right-of- way line of Countryside Boulevard, thence North 07 degrees ` .0.7 minutes 00 seconds West 437.43 feet thence South N"4 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West, 132.00 feet; thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 second West, 36.00 feet;' thence South 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West, 1s:;; j; 75.00 feet; thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds %;y`iat,idt^s West, 28.00 feet, thence South 82 degrees 53 minutes T4 00 seconds West,,16.00 feet; thence North 07 degrees -{r 07 minutes 00 seconds West, 117.00 feet thence South B2 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West, 302.00 feet; thence ,•;lr :",? South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East 61.00 feet; thence South 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West, 16.00 feet thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 29.00 feet; thence South 82 degrees 53 minutes . R 00 seconds West, 230.00 feet; thence South 07 degrees :.:;';:`•'' ;,ty 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 465.23 feet; thence along a curve to- the left, Radius 1110.00 feet; Arc 493.35 feet ;_ chord South 66 degrees 35 minutes 30 seconds West, ' ' 489.30 feet, said curve being the Northerly right-of-way .';•r;;. . ' line of Countryside Boulevard; thence South 53 degrees '.<•;-: '.• i' t;?•;?::?: • :.. 51 minutes 32 seconds West, 154.24 feet; thence along a :,•;:, :....;.r curve to the right, Radius 25.00 feet, Arc 40.05 feet, chord: North 80 degrees 15 minutes 08 seconds West, 35.90 feet to '':,•: the intersection of the Easterly right-of-way of U.S. +'`•' =?l'; Highway No. 19 with the Northerly right-of-way line of Countryside Boulevard; thence along said Easterly right- I. of-way line of U.S. Highway No. 19 by a curve to the right, ;£ - - - y •? Q 2?. ' ice' - ,,?••t .. I 46 minutes 57 seconds.West, 633.68 feet, thence North 82.degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 688.53 feet; thence North•07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West, 540.00 feet; thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 430.50 feet= thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East,. 85.00 feet; thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes .00 seconds East, 15.00 feet; thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East 55.00 feet; thence North 82. degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 96.00 feet; thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 64.00 feet; thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 98.00 feet; thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West 64.00 feet; thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes :. 00 seconds East, 96.00 feet; thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West, 20.00 feet; thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 60.00 feet; thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West 60.00 feet; thence South 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West, 40.00 feet; thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West, 191.00 feet; thence South 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West, 20.00 feet; thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West, 216.99 feet; thence North 89 degrees 55 minutes 13 seconds West, 239.84'feet, thence ' North 00 degree 08 minutes 07 seconds East, 80.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 13 seconds East along the Southerly right-of-way line of State Road No. 580, 1372.56 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing approxi- mately 30.2473 acres more or less. Parcel 2: Commence at the center of Section 30, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, run South 89 degrees 55 minutes 13 seconds East, 860.20 feet along the East/West centerline of said Section 30; thence run South 00 degree 04 minutes 47 seconds West, 50.00 feet for a Point of Beginning; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 13 seconds East, 180.00 feet along aline that is 50.00 feet South of and parallel to the East/West centerline of said Section 30; thence South 00 degrees 05 minutes 47 seconds West, 153.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 55 minutes 13 seconds West, 180.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 04 minutes 47 seconds East, 153.00 feet to the Point of Beginning, containing approxi- mately 0.632 acres more or less. 9,.1! / ?7[r??.7..i-'.i ?r•' ? :ti7ln: :, y: :??_:!L•Y.,.; .,•. ; t. ? ..r. ., .:. '0.1.5917 erg 471 2 Radius 2764. 93 feet, Are 635.07 feet, chord North 27 degrees Parcel 3: North 535 feet less the East 120 feet of Lot 1, Belle Haven Unit A, according to plat thereof recorded in F .\. _ ? .lam'.. ?. -.+Y • .. . ' ?.< ... :.? ' 1" ~a 0.1.5917 nc? 472 -' :Pl'at' Sook 25, page 59 of the Public Records of Pinellas County.,.Florida, containing-5.305 acres more or less. '' "`"' '• ; : ".P Parcel 4':. A perpetual easement for ingress, egress, access, ".uswand maintenance over and across the following parcel of ' land situate, lying and being'in Pinellas County, Florida, to wits... The North 40 feet of the East 120 feet of Lot 1, ;.. Belle .Haven Unit A as recorded in Plat Book 25, page 59 of the.Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. '•°'? The property conveyed includes all of.Parcel 1, - i ' Parcel 2, Parcel 3 and Parcel 4 as described above. - ,7 t" ..?,. tilt: •:'.%''.;':', "' _ ``? - -- ' t'. r. uV• t" r F. ii ?,, Fyn ` ,?` ,l. .l , •t. •'t Y' •.l .. _- I .1l•? . . I C 1 INST # 96-047135 FEB 21, 1996 8:35PM ,A , I PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. -- - OFF.REC.BK 9254 PG 1658';?,'-`, >; WARRANTY DEED i STATE OF FLORIDA § ??NEU?S § KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE`%bRESEN't$: --' . § 01 RECORDINGOUNTY OF SEC -7- ' DS 4'-02-2-' THAT, CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPERS, INCORPORATEp), an: ,Arkansas INT FEES corporation ("Grantor"), for and in consideration of,?hig.hum of Ten -and No1100 Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid by DILLARD DEPARTMENT ???F --STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Gi`arLtee'l) , whose address is --1600 Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas 7`2,01, qno other good and REV - valuable consideration, the receipt ,and sudicierlcy of which are TOTAL hereby acknowledged by Grantor, has (qF?Dt WGAINED, SOLD, and TOTAL _e NVEYED and b these resents, does` GT?, BARGAIN, SELL, and ' -A-057.38oNVEY unto Grantee, that certain, txac??'a f?real property described } in Exhibit A attached hereto-_4ntlzad& a part hereof for all purposes, together with all,,?Md'siriglilAx' the rights, privileges, I hereditaments, and appurtenances pertaihing to such real property, including any and all improvements pnd fixtures currently attached to and located thereon (tk ie 1,1 .ropPriy") . % This conveyange,'is,bbinq made by Grantor and accepted by Grantee subject only to?ail covenants, easements, restrictions and other matters of',ecpr?'affecting the Property. \ being made by Grantor and accepted by This conv?yan a tIs, Grantee subjec`\to'taxes for the year 1996, the payment of which Grantee aysitm?? TO, HAVE `A?70 TO HOLD the Property, together with, all and i singulark the ;;rights and appurtenances thereto in anywise belorigri3g`,, to-Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever; and_subi'ec-to all covenants, easements, restrictions and other mattext_ ?,1``record affecting the property, Grantor does hereby bind ' ,1`•Gra for a7[d Grantor's successors and assigns to warrant and forever 'iieferid,, all and singular, the Property unto the Grantee and Grantee?s successors and assigns, against every person whomsoever t law4ully claiming or to claim the same, or any part thereof. yj (THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK] -:kK lm glary Trot it 4 ?;,6 v hMrp*b1a I'm R q ec1r, p(HZl1a?' CoW?!' `-1?-8 -cb Zo8 i •1, EXECUTED to be effective as of the 5th day of February, 1996. PINELLAS COUNTY FLA-- WITNESSES: GRANTOR: OFF. REC. BK 9254 PG 16,4,-,- , CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPERS, INCORPORA!fE? ,,','" Name: Jaweiq A. R1 an Arkansas corporation, By: ` 1Name: awes reemE 77 Name : /m!r/ Title : Vice President & st. ecretary 11 11 STATE OF ARKANSAS § COUNTY OF PULASKI Thi intr?um was acknowledefore/ me on February 5, 7- 1996, by /Y1t1,fy ` V- "? anr??a,,J , e ? 's•,' of Construction Develope , Incorporated, an Atk rsa? corporation, on behalf of said corporation. - ` % [ttCICUIUC[!(c(tCCIC(CCC(tt(C[!tC(UCtClttccc a ? ' . ` ` > Deborah K. Agee ' Notary Public e , Pulaski County, Arkansas Not4ry Public, Sta a of Arkansas .: My Commission Expires 3/10/2001 t ' - - My Commission E?pixPrinted/Typed Name My county of residence is: Pulaski . % WARRANTY DEED FLORIDA After recording return to: James W. Cherry, Jr., Esq. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. 1600 Cantrell Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 9LO37515 TCO Di i! l??0 1.?.?i.t 01 DED-DILLARD DEPARTiiENT STORES RECORDING 151. 019 DOC STAMP - DR 19 3 '$44,02:2.30 TOTAL: i44 t 17, 30 CHECK AMT. TENDERED: $441037.30 CHANGE'. $.0 PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 9254 PG 1660 EXHIBIT A Legal Description - - - - - (Countryside Mall) Parcel I: A parcel of land located in Section 30, Township 28 South, Range 14'Fa•5t,, iAellm County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the East 1/4 corner of Section 30, Township 28 South,-Ran ??16 Easty; Run S.00°00'04"E., 63.00 feet to the intersection of the south rightrof=way line State Road 580 with the east line of said Section 30; thence N.89°5,5(13"W., along the south right-of-way line of State Road 580, 1372.56 feet for a pol4t. of begibhing; thence S.00°08'07"W., 67.00 feet; thence S.89055113"E., 239.84 feet;`?hencs'?5.07°07'00"E., 216.99 feet; thence N.82°53'00"E., 20.00 feet; thence S.070071001'E:; 191.b0 feet; thence N,82°53'00"E., 40,00 feet; thence 5.0700710011E., 6040 feet; thence 5.82°53'00"W., 60.00 feet; thence 5.07°07'00"E., 20.00 feet; thence S.?2.°5310011W., 96.00 feet; thence 5.07°07'00"E,, 64.00 feet; thence 5.82053100"W.` 98.00 fedti theme N.07°07100"W., 64.00 feet; thence 5.82°53'00"W., 96.00 feet; the4id;M7°0,7'0d'W., 55.00 feet; thence S.82053100"W., 15.00 feet; thence N.07°07'00" %, 8fi:DG et; thence S. 82°53'00"W., 661.50 feet; thence N.07°07'00"W., 353.00%jeet;ili &-N.000044711E., 181.10 feet to the south right-of-way line of State ltoad 580f thence 5.89°55'13"E., along said right-of-way, 228.62 feet; thence leA•afigsaitl nightlyof-way S.00°04'47"W., 138.00 feet; thence S.89°55'13"E., 180.00 feet,,Ahence4'47"E., 140.00 feet to the south right-of-way line of State Road 580;;thence 5P"5511311E. along said south right-of-way ' 311.13 feet to the point of begimjing.`,, ,; - ------ ----- - INT tai T unN TO. FEES D NCAPOUANO 8 B02ARTH, D AORTH, . MTF ATTOMEY3 AT LAW P/C RE• OMAN= n 3W 1 TOTAL•00 _ 001094.00239:488598.01 • CK SAL ?JMW°v CHO AMT That Grantor, for and inconsideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00),a¢d other valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledgl,d, hereby; grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto Grantee,,ULof Grantor's right, title and interest in and to that certain real property situate, lying andin Pinellas County, Florida, and being more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter referred to as the "Land"), togetlib with all tengments, hereditaments and appurtenances of Grantor belonging or in ?pnywise a?perlainQ to the Land (collectively, the "Property"), subject to real estate taxes for tll?auti?nt year gtrd subsequent years. TOGETHER with all and singular of the tenen: nts;,heredit4nents and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. ` TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same itt,i'ee simple forever. AND Grantor hereby covpnarfts with Grnnliee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the Property in fee simple; that the Cv finto>; h s good d ht and lawful authority to sell and convey the Property, and hereby w rr' is the"tifle to the Property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persofWc'laigring b't ugh or under the Grantor, but against no others. This conveyance is subl'Zc?l`to,taxds accruirig subsequent to the date hereof, and to casements, restrictions, agreements, colndi&ns, limitations and reservations, if any, referenced in Exhibit "B" attached he 61:6and i? aoi -a rt hereof for all purposes, but this reference to the foregoing shall not operate; to reimp4d the same. INV774ESS-% I*REOF, Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed and delivemcl ig its,;bn a 6y its corporate officer thereunto duly authorized, has caused its corporate sFal'Eoe hergunso Affixed and has intended this instrument to be and become effective as of the da'rgnd,ye@r first above written. PAGES ACCT ' REC DR219 A, 33tF. So __ 4S L.% 12 t I 13 P PC 89A83 CMAR 810957 Pa a SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE made as of the 2 70 day of , ,YL , 2000, between BELLWETHER PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA (LIMITED), a Florida limited partnership, = Grantor, and DILLARD'S, INC., a Delaware corporation, Grantee, whose address is 1600 ; . ` Cantrell Road, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201. ; (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, - - and the successors and assigns of trustees, partnerships and corporations.) WITNESSETH: ' . ........... .. PINELLRS COUNTY MR. . f OFF.REC.BK 10957 PO 2272 1 t i 3 A -. A?I??yta?G'?r X326 STATE OF ?L"?'24 ??4 - COUNTY OF ?tlt-TO1J The foregoing instrume ?,'wa?,'aeknow7edged before me this day of uA tt 2000, by -, l , as 1l([' - 'SI t _ 7' of HRE OUNTRYSIDE,,, 1 1,,,-a'Delaware corporation, as the General Partner of BELLWETHER PROPERTIES OF 'FLORIDA (LIMITED), a Florida limited partnership, on behalf of the limited ? attner ). Wd person (check one) its personally known to me, ? produced a driver's licehs6e 3sstied by a state of the United States within the last five (5) years) as identification, produced other identification, to wit: 6. ZMAilk- - - - % Notary Public, State of Georgia Commission No.: ty, ?.a My Commission Expires: My Comml&*n EX01183Nov, 5, anal Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of BELLWETHER PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA (LIMITED), a Florida limited partnership, By: HRE COUNTRYSIDE, INC., _ a Delaware c rporation, its General Partner By: , , . ,. ., PrintN Print Name: - - e: ?a • d & /n? Ahst?? - ` Title: I I Print Name' ?' - - - Att ' - ,Secretary (CORPOMTE SEAL) Address: ;00-HRE Cbuirttystdd, Inc. OgEe 1-PacegF,e'iry Rd., Ste. 2275 z 001094.00279:488598.01 .' ''?.?. {?.y/ ?I 5S17;,, ?• :.'"??•...?''.:??.. ? G.1•:.. ?.'.. iii ??y ,ryF? MN ?:?n•, Exhibit A A portion of the Southeast''/, of Section 30, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; W -n S ? s Commence at the East % comer of Section 30, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, run - S.00°00'04"E., 63.00 feet along the East line of said Section 30 to the Southerly right of way I}'ne _- , ? / of State Road.580 as described in O.R. Book 5991, Page 1745; thence along the said Soutliier1y right of way line of State Road 580 by the following nine (9) courses; (1) t!6p'nce N.89°55'13"W., 561.35 feet; (2) thence N.00°04'47"E., 3.00 feet; (3) thence N,89°?51'3'W., 25.00 feet; (4) thence S,00004'47"W., 3.00 feet; (5) thence N.89°55'13"W., 7,19.50?feet; (Q _ ; thence N.0000447"E., 4.00 feet; (7) thence N.89°55'13"W., 15.00 fe¢tf (8) thohce S.00004'47"W., 4.00 feet; (9) thence N.89°55'13"W., 51.75 feet; thence leaving',saId Soudkily right of way line of State Road 580 S.00°08'07"W., 67.00 feet; thence S.89°551.3"E, 239:84 feet; thence S.07°07'00"E., 121.99 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence N.82°53'00" E., 60.00 feet; thence S.07°07'00"E., 286.00 feet; thence S.82°53'00"W., 40.00 feet; thence N,07°07'00"W., 191.00 feet; thence S.82°53'00"W., 20.00 feet; thencdN.07°6?!00"W., 95.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. ; Containing 13,340 square feet or 0.3062 acres more or,(ess, / / I ? \ I ? A-1 • /lax. .R.. f I?•,m?a;• - a:• I PINELLAS COUNTY FIR, I OFF, REC . 9K i 6es? pQ 2573 i' l o ? T f CN t?• II T N J N [? g ?IOQA'P:488598.01 c:+ o o ,t, , •Tl ',•C i L7 2 4 ? .D m 770ox7 Ell ' ? _ ? - .. .ate ... ... ....?... _. ... ?.. I• P INELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF,REC,SK 10857 PO 2274 EXHIBIT B E The Permitted Exceptions , --- i. The lien for 2000 ad valorem taxes. t F 2. Terms, covenants, conditions, rights, duties and obligations of the Constnlc11011, -''`? Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement between U.S.H. Properties Corporation, a Florida corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York corporation, Associated My % Good Corporation, a Virginia corporation, J. C. Penney Properties, Inc,,;a Dclawzire• _: .' j corporation, Alstores Realty Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Maas Brothads, i_• a Florida corporation, dated September 26, 1973 and filed Septembel',27, 1971 n Inc. , Official Records Book 4083, Page 1118; as affected by First knendmenf,4o I. Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement, dated Februaryr 19; f974 i and filed May 21, 1974 in Official Records Book 4173, Page`1376; Second Amendment dated June 6, 1974 and filed July 30, 1974 in Official Recd s,Book 41 9, Page 386; Assignment and Assumption Agreement of Anchor Store Leas ,,O%r.Afg Agreements and Reciprocal Easement Agreements, dated August 8;, 999 rid 1filt cLAugust 8, 1979 in Official Records Book 4894, Page 2128; and Qssignmh6l a6d A-ssbmption of Shopping Center Agreements, dated December 6, 1984 ?&,file? January 18, 1985 in Official Page 478, Public Repoids o'f Pibc,) s County, Florida. Records Book 5917 , ranted to Florida Power t;oToration,', a Florida corporation, from U.S.H. sement E 3 g a . Properties Corporation, a Florida%cgrpgNion &ed December 20, 1974 and filed ' ', Page 1765, Public Records of Pinellas February 20, 1975 in Off?ciajgLtord-,Book-426 County, Florida. 4. A ten-foot Florida Paver Corpwration Easement shown on F.P.C. Drawing Number 74-352D, dated J»1x17, J? anti raised March 6, 1975. ' I ( I i. I I tetl:wl 1 . I .. • . ' ' ?..:. t.,tw.` ,.J ?? . , i? ,..1!: ? .il'•:. ; : N ?.I>t: t µ T ? _. SIA THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: Margaret R. Johnson J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc. 6501 Legacy Drive (MS 2102) Plano, TX 75024-3698 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: J. C. Penney Corporation, Inc. 6501 Legacy Drive (MS 2102) Plano, TX 75024-3698 Attn.: Margaret R Johnson PAGES ACCT REC DR219 DS 1NT FEES MTF P/C REV fOTAL - CK BAL CNG A ff EEN F. Dl ALAKER, CLERK IF COLPT PINELLAS l TY3 FLORIDA (727) 46HE w8950 11-M-200. 10:45:26- -8 i 51 DEN C PEINEY CGRPOTION 000068 1#:0349,4022 W%.,13193 SPG:0478 EPG:04a REWRDING 004 PAGES 1"$19-50 TOW. _ - $19.50 $19.50 RED: CHECK AMT. TENDf _ DY VTY, oy" -- 83-474C62 NOV''' 8-2003 LU:47nm P INEL.LASX0 ILK 13193 P[3 478 - ' IW11iff1il i T,111 go 11111 gill 11111 SPACE ABOVE?TIIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE , IMPROYEMEI?J.TS--dtm ?T I DEED THIS IMPROVEMENTS Q1AV CLA1M 1DkED dated as of October 1, 2003, from ' mailing address is 6501 Legacy Drive (MS JCP Realty, Inc., a Delaware C6,rporakibta? Wh 6se 2102), Plano, Texas 7502,4-369'/Attn.: Real Estate Counsel ("Grantor"), to J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., wh6s4 \ moiling address is 6501 Legacy Drive (MS 2105), Plano, Texas 75024-3698, At ::- Real'ataVCounsel ('Grantee"). Grafox;'in consideration of Ten dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration •;teceive&\from''Grantee, does hereby grant, bargain, and sell and convey to Grantee, its successor-s and assigns forever, the buildings, structures and improvements now located on or permanently affixed to the land described in Exhibit "A" hereto, including without limitation the store buildings, structures, walks, ways and other improvements constructed thereon, together with all of Grantor's fixtures and equipment located therein and used in connection 1 PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.9K 13193 PG 479 ` with the operation thereof. The said buildings, structures and improvements are intended to be and shall remain real property. This conveyance shall not include the parcel of land upon which su6h'`buik mgs, structures and other improvements are located. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these p?dsents to Oe signed and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed. ,JCP'Realty„'Inc., >a )?elav?korporation Witn s Signature ` Printed name Jo P. Garvey Ex utive Vice President { ATT-*" v ATTEST: iti2e$s Sfg`n to By: Prihte_d pafne Margaret R. Jo n Secretary 2 PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 13193 PS 48O STATE OF TEXAS } } ss.: COUNTY OF COLLIN } -' BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this Ayof 20 93; the subscriber, a Notary Public in and for said County antate, personally came fpfin P. bai Ve the Executive Vice President of JCP Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation, 4,vho exr'cuted the foregoing instrument, who acknowledged that s/he did sign said ins 41W m such,eabacity on behalf of said corporation, duly authorized; that said instrument w" signed as Ttis- free act and deed individually and the free act and deed of said corporation. f IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my notarial seal on the day and year first above written. ,rimer. ? ? ` • • . LYNN GLAR MY COMMISSION EXPIRES '' Jun$19, 200e - ` I y1C ission Expires: 3 PINELLRS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC,BK 13193 PG 479 ` with the operation thereof. The said buildings, structures and improvements are intended to be and shall remain real property. ` This conveyance shall not include the parcel of land upon which suCll``buwmgs, structures and other improvements are located. ` IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these p?dsents to ?e signed and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed. <',JCP; Realty„'Inc. , 'a'aelavW -Corporation Witn S Signature ` 14#'r?t1? Printed name Jo P. Garvey -' s<NiE,3, ' Ex utive Vice Preszdent ??TTEST: itaeSs,S2g?n1tu e 11 % a cc-? /'?-L--- % 1C. By: Pribte_d_riatne Margaret R. John g& Secretary 2 PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.BK 13193 PS 480 STATE OF TEXAS } } ss.: COUNTY OF COLLIN } BE IT REMEMBERED, that on this ?Aay of 2093;1346rd,me, the _ subscriber, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally came f rhn P: Gaj Vey the Executive Vice President of JCP Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation ; ?vho ex?cyted the foregoing instrument, who acknowledged that s/he did sign said ins"arV iri such,eahacity on behalf of said corporation, duly authorized; that said instrument wad signed ae liis-free act and deed individually and the free act and deed of said corporation. t ; IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name acid affixed my 11, notarial seal on the day and year first above written. 1 fry ? ` ` ,' / al"?' ">rL LYNN BLAIR , - - MY COMMISSION EXPIRES I;TOt$T? LIblic = .s. a?n? te,zoos I ission Expires: ` 1 1 ?' 1 < i 3 . . 1 PINELLRB COUNTY FLR. OFF. REC . BK 13133 PO 491 Exhibit "A° Legal Description Description of Land All that certain tract or parcel of land and premises, hereafter particularly described, rate; lying arhd> being in the City of Clearwater, County of Pinellas, State of Florida: That part of East Y2 of Section 30, Township 28 South, ;range 16 bast, Pinellas, County; Fi6rida, described as foilows: 1 Commence at the East A corner of Section 30, Township 28 South, Range 15`F-ast, ruil,5outh 00°00'04" East, 958.63 feet along the East line of said Section 30 to i; &brtli@riy Wdht-of-Way line of Countryside Boulevard; thence along said Northerly Right-of-Way 10 of Couptrysfd'e Boulevard South 48°08'04" West, 67.14 feet to a Point of Beginning; continue thenc4 touth 48°08'04" West, 288.49 feet; thence by a curve to the right, Radius 990.00 feet, Arc 460.?Gfe*, Chdo South 61°27'16" West, 456.17 feet; thence North 07007'00" West, 974.53 feet; thence lkrttj,92"53`00' East, 742.00 feet; thence South 00000'04" East, 648.43 feet to the Point of Beginning; ?ove described property as TOGETHER WITH nonexclusive easement(s) fJ8"nefiting thea?b established by Construction, Operation and Recti%prgcaI-Easement Agreement dated September 20, 1973, and recorded in O,( ., Bootc4A83;-page 1118, as amended by instruments recorded In O.R. Book 4173, Wage 1-476 and recorded In O.R. Book 4199, page 386 and recorded In O.R. Book ] 0$s7; page`Z293,bf the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT road rights-of-wi?y.`.> .l , (J assets distributed to each shareholder being proportionate to the amount"bf stock of Grantor held by such shareholder. In the liquidation, Grantee received, among other assets, 7 the land and improvements conveyed hereby. In connection with the distribution of its assets, Grantor agreed to do, u execute, acknowledge and deliver all such further acts, assurances, deeds, assignments, transfers, conveyances, a powers of attorney and other instruments and papers as may .; .3 be required to assign, convey and deliver to and vest in /JA J > ericas, ew or , ` __ PRELIMINARY STATEMENT -•x,63'- =u On December 30, 1986, Grantor was a wholly owned direct subsidiary of Allied Stores Corporation, a Delaware I corporation ("Old Allied"). On December 31, 1986, Old i/ Allied was merged with and into Campeau Acquisition Corpora- tion, a Delaware corporation ("Campeau"), which then changed 11 Ch its name to Allied Stores Corporation ("New Allied"). As of CjqI3 part of this merger, the assets of Old Allied were distrib- 40 Be ted to New Allied and subsidiaries of New Allied formed for 41 p that purpose, including Grantee, which received a portion df 43 int -----'-the stock of Grantor. Immediately after the merger of Old Allied and Campeau, Grantor was liquidated and its assets were dis- tributed to its shareholders, the estimated value of the OFF `'"``' b 5 2 9 PG x'213 87165660 / C•'N/7SE rn&AfN/?TT,a,v FLA/Property No. ly? NEB yd,ra, iVy iao:),;- DEED dated as of December 31, 1986, from ALSTORES REALTY CORPORATION ("Grantor") to ALLIED STORES GENERAL REAL ESTATE COMPANY am) ("Grantee"), both Delaware corporations y _ having offices at 1114 Avenue of the ft- N Y k N Y 10036 Grantee and protect its right, title and interest in, among other assets, such land and improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals E and $10, Grantor does hereby grant unto Grantee, its succes- u sors and assigns forever, ALL those certain plots, pieces or parcels of land described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected; TOGETHER with all right, title and interest,ciE any, of Grantor in and to any streets and road abuttin42thji' `c above described premises to the center lines thereof; TOGETHER with the appurtenances and all the estate and i-? r.? 4Z RETURN Toa-ec -3 1y7 FIRST AmEn1cAN TITLE COMFA!nb OF FLORIDA, INC. ' \,O` 228a CLSEAHWATEn, FL S?676E 293 i < < A MbMFG0214 2 i rights of Grantor in and to said premises, including, without limitation, all right, title and interest,of Grantor in and to any leases and any construction, operating and reciprocal easement agreement or other similar agreement affecting said premises; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the premises herein granted unto Grantee, its successors and assigns. i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party of Grantor has duly executed this Deed as of the day and year first above written. Signed in the presence. of: f//J yi i Lida ; ?%[i!-i Witness tines STATE OF NEW YORK, ) ) •ss.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK,) ALSTORES REALTY CORPORATION, by(I resident ,• / / /rg Attest: A'A.' ? 'Q40'? Ass stant Secretary The foregoing instrument was acknowledged be ore me this ?fo day of June, 1987, by JOSEPH J. C"DROI d PATRICK H. BOWEN, Vice President and Assistant Secretary of Grantor, ALSTORES REALTY CORPORATION, on behalf of the corporation. 6L-t? Notar Pu lic [Notarial Seal] CAROLYN "MiM Notary NNo 9}S' 84383eW York Quallfled In New York Counr Commfssian F.xpR? j,,, 74• ' ?g . l . . • - sEibS29PG02l5 _a r Property No. 147 EXHIBIT A Parcel 1 That part of Southeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County, Florida described as follows: Commence 'at- the East 1/4 corner Section 30, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, run South 00 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds East; 958.63 feet along the East line of said Section 30 to the Northerly right-of-way line of Countryside Boulevard, by the following two courses: Thence South 48 degrees 08 minutes 04 seconds West, 355.63 feet; Thence by a curve to the right, radius 990.00 feet, arc 555.76 feet, Chord South 64 degrees 13 minutes 01 seconds West, 548.49 feet for a Point of Beginning. Continue thence along curve to the right, radius 990.00 feet, arc 169.00 feet, Chord South 85 degrees 11 minutes 21 seconds West, 168.80 feet; Thence North 89 degrees 55 minutes 13 seconds West, 397.52 feet; Thence by a curve to the left, radius 1110.00 feet, arc 208.36 feet, Chord South 84 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds West, 208.06 feet; Thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West, 465.23 feet; Thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 230 feet; Thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West, 29.00 feet; Thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 16.00 feet; Ta OREM aj 4 . . 7? R cb-52gnD2I b r e R Property No. 147 EXHIBIT A Parcel 1 (continued) Thence North 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds West, 61.00 feet; Thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 302.00 feet; Thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 117.00 feet; Thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 16.00 feet; Thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 28.00 feet; Thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East 75.00 feet; Thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 36.00 feet; Thence North 82 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East, 132.00 feet; Thence South 07 degrees 07 minutes 00 seconds East, 437.42 feet to the point of Beginning. I 1 1 , lab529pg82I Property. No. 147 EXHIBIT A Parcel 2 Together with the benefits and subject' to the burdens imposed by the exclusive and non-exclusive easements and rights of ingress and egress, parking, utilities, and other purposes, together with all other rights and benefits, created, existing and/or granted as an appurtenance or interest in real property to and for the estate of Allied Stores General Real Estate Company or its predecessors pursuant to: 1.. Grant of Easement between U.S. Home of Florida, Incorporated, State of Florida,, U.S.H. Properties Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Company, Alatores Realty Corporation, Associated Dry Goods Corporation and J.C. Penny Properties, Incorporated dated September 25, 1973, recorded September 27, 1973, in O.R. Book 4083, Page 1114; 2. Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement between U.S.H. Properties Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Company, Associated Dry Goods Corporation, J.C. Penny Properties, Incorporated, Alatores Realty Corporation and Maas Brothers, Inc. dated September 20, 1973, recorded September 27, 1973 in O.R. Book 4083, Page 1118; 3. First Amendment to Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement between U.S.H. Properties Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Company, Associated Dry Goode Corporation, J.C. Penny Properties, Incorporated, Alstores Realty-Corporation and Maas Brothers, Inc. dated February 19, 1974, recorded on May 21, 1974 in O.R. Book 4173, Page 1376; and 4. Second Amendment to Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement between U.S.H. Properties Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Company, Associated Dry Goods Corporation, J.C. Penny Properties, Incorporated, Alatores Realty Corporation and Maas Brothers, Inc. dated June 6, 1974, recorded July 30, 1974 in O.R. Book 4199, Page 386 t , , e 4C83 miiV }" . 73133575 ttclsaiiLt :"THIS WARRANTY DEED, Made this.. day Of-Se _tember q_ p, 1973_ ?>, _yy?:s p.Fl,-0R?iD? :"PHIS U. S. I-L PROPERTIES CORPORATION, a corporation tyyo* f ' existing under the laws of the State of Florida hereinifter'talled • ? ? ? ?? ?? the Grantor, and SEARROEBUCK AND CO., a New York ,.` corpoiaon vrhvl? N E (off S yaws [ O- Le if, A whose madiri}'address is_ ::.:{ GiSQstis?txr Att-v•?a. C?eotl?tz 3o'!uS hereinafter called the Grantee, WITNESSETH, that the said Grantor, fbr and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) '. and other valuable considerations to said Grantor in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowl- edged, has granted, bargained, and sold unto the said Grantee, and Granfee's heirs, or successors, and assigns forever, all that certain parcel of land in the County of Pinellas and State of Florida, 'and described on Exhibit A attached hereto. --and easement as contained in Clerk's Instrument No. 865066, Pinellas C ounty, R ec osda, And the said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and Y+j1(,c?efend the same against :x the IawfVk,daims of Ali- persons whomsoever, except taxes for year - lY f 3 -and subsequent* I"Gr.ntor"and ' Cr"ce•' Fe used herein t angular or plural, the dngul,r ,hall irtctude 7r+C"•D ?I, a.id my gendry .h. ude ail genders, .s contear requi,es.1 Attest • " ' ?,? %%? U. S, H. Properties Corporation- s ABia t' cretary Signed, Sealed and Delivered in Our Presence. BY -' y President State of Florida County of Pinellas . r _ I HEREBY CERTIFY, That on this_..__-° "___-day of __.__Se _pte.__m?b-er A. D. 19 r3 -before me, an officer duly authorized in the 51ate and County aforesaid to take acknowledgemena, personally appeared Joseph F. Jo son-__ __ President and Shirley_.Kappen,_As.st? Secretary This Instrumerit was prepared by: of U. S. H. Properties _Corporation a corporation Albert I. Gordon under the laws of the State of.__.....Florida ____-•____- to me 1007 lst National Bank Bldg. ::..4 known to be the person described in and who executed the Tampa, Florida 336024 foeegolRg conveyance and acknowledged before me that he executed the same in the name of said corporation; that as such corporatiT. officer he is duly authorized by the corporation .. to do so; that he affixed thereto the official seal of said / corporation-and. the said instrument Is the act and deed of /. t}°O LD [1 f said corporation. I r FOR WITNESS My signature and oificial seal in the County and State WEST COAST TITLE 0014PANY last aforesaid. , • m ??t? My Commission Expires: lletarY Pa-' Gc 5'_:: of Rui:>t ci large .. _.-_._...?ty lanrnitua E;.,•iiii?i et?;lli3° ''ls% Weal it Awer+. rn i C.w.R a.. (Affi. NotwySe-VAOr0 1 a p, GU • xtr:any ' . sri `-.t.ld 0253a3 rV rrb?? p ?7r ? CD (Ifllllillllllii lAfflx tfer.) . j'1 ,... I JI2oi] 11I 1111i111I"!G'L(?? f 11,1 ? ::•_ :?? C::, t. 1 , . x.4083 PnEiM a.r . , That part of RT'!; Of SEk of Section 30, To.mship 28 South, Range 16 East, -pinAl'as County, Florida described as follows: Co.w-ience at the. Fast 1/4 corner of Section 30, Townshin 2A South, Fange 'lfi East, Run South 00' 00' 04" Last, 50,00 feet to the intersection of the South night of Way line of State•Stoad 9580 with the Fast lina?of,said. ;.:. Section 30; Thence North 891'55'. 13°-•Ytcst, along the South Aight.,of WaV line of State Road MO, 2092.31 feet for a Point of Deainninq. Thence South 00' 04' 47" West, 196.10 feet; Thence South 071 07' 00" Fast, 353.00 feet; Thence North 82' 53' 00" East, 231.00 feet. Thence South 07v 07' 00" East, 540.00 feet; Thence South 82. 53' 00" West, 688.53 feet; Thence along a curve to the Right beinq the East Right of Way line of U.S. Itighway 919, Radius 2764.93 feet, Arc 1013.35 feet, Chord North 10. 42' 13" West, i '.' 1007.68 feet; Thence North 00. 12' 15" West, 126.50 feet; Thence North `• 230 13' 44" East, 25.03 feet; Thence South 89. 55' 13" East, alone the South ; Right of Way line of State Road #580, 521.38 feet to the Point of Beginning. i I Exhibit A to Warranty Deed from U. S. H. . Properties Corporation to Sears, Roe- buck and Cow. t Z v-P.- 1518 mu 92 Q1 ? j 4 s ?*?-jt?I =10 II%,r'i'1T.E, Male this day of lj:e, be:jee: CE,?? .'E. KS X% ai.sc known and shown of record as C. E. MCB, oined 'cy t6ls FAVIA Mr-H, of the County of Cock, and State of Illi:•ois, Lan::es of the _ .rst Part, and FLORIDA POWER COMPGEATION, 101 Fifth j.reet South, St. Petersburg, Florida, a ccxporatiot existing under the laws .'f ht State of Florida, having its princ-lpr,.t place oaf business in the County of Pi el'_as and State of Florida, Party of the Second Part; 1 WITN3SSE'I'E, That the said Parties of the First Part, for and it consideration of .he sin of TEN DOLLARS (*10.00) AND OTHER VALUABLE COLiSIDERATJ0I;S shem ir: hams paid, the receipt whereof is hereby a kno:rledge-, have granted, bargained, sold, aliened, remised, released, enfeoffed, cvnJey°e- an- confirmed and b)y these presents do grant, bargain, sell, &I--er., remise, release, enfeoff, convey and confirm unto the said Party of the Secs-s- Par: and its successors and assigns forever, all .hose certain. tercels .f land lying and being in the County Uf Pinellas rsrs L,art:cula_?ly described as f.'__ows: PARCEL' A All that part or poartion of the NQ of the SFr", and the SE of the NEt, Sect-icon 31, Townshir. 21: South., Range 1' East lying and being hest of .he folio«Ln& described surrey line: Coavercing a: the southwest corner of the NEE- of the SE' of Section 31, Tovnship 28 South, Range 1F East; thence Nr?*_.h O' 301 15" West, along the nest bsurdary of said NEM of the BE-1c, and along ti:e West tourdary of Florida Power Corporation's East .o? Clearra:e_ Sutstaticr, property, as described _r. ; official Fec.r: Bonk 1407, Page 651, PuLlic Records of Pine:__s 7.urty, Florida, 200 feet to the north- vest correr of said property; thence North 8j" 5,4' -- '"" 9-iii 03" Eas : al cn.g the Womb boundary of said prover ty 7404 `. atl parallel to the South boundary of said NEr of the SEj, 575.44 feet fur the Point of Beginning; thence Nsrth 06 16, 00" Wrst, 2272.23 feet; thence m,rik.. 52° 55o' 45" -Past, 373.75 feet to a point or, the Westerly right-of-way line curve of U. S. Eighway No. 1>, said poit.t being 100.00 feet from and radial tc the center line of said higr,vay, s'li- curve te{ 4 rr?rcavr- Sguthvesterly having a ra-iius 2764."?! feet; thence Northvesterly along said Westerly riLht-cf-.isy line curve a chord tearing Ertl .- .:a :c: :f Iir rth 15` 53' 54" West 34.04 feet to, a I•c_c :t -'_ N.r.u Lr undory of the SE- of tide HEI,. of sal: ^_t_Gn 31. I PARCEL B All that Pert or ;rrtian of I-ts 1 and 2, and that par= .or portion of e- .s 4 and 5, lying hest of We: -t, r igt •af-way .boundary o:• U. a^. Righvay No. 1.$ Zlock 25, Qhsutauqua brit N; . 1, ?ciior. B, in .N?• of 2i9; t.f Section 3L., Towwat ip e3 S:.uth, Range 15 Bact, toes htr w th latttefl st: tT.E adsacent thereto, per plat r z--r5`d In .Plat Book 9; F-we 57, Public Records of Plm--UP= County., 71sri b., ly. within the following deSCr?? - -. Beginning st a print :m the South boundary of r-%mu :,e::T-m .Unit No- 1, Sect? E, as recorded in plat Bcr.& y, sage 57, Public P mxi s of Pinellas County, Florida, sou-,:. 89° 42' 45" chest 4B7 .10 feet from the aoutheaatr of said Chautauqua, said point being on the Westerly r 1&t-a-mW line curve of U. S. Xighvey lio. 19, 1Drj. r . Sget fray Bpd xudial to the center line of mid t.,gL- gray, said curve 1m:LY$ cor cave souVzmsterly bsviag a ssdius of 27644.3. feet; thence northwesterly al-Jrg Si! westerly right-of-way lime curve, a chord beering a*:= disbame of risrth 33, 42' loo" test 142.57 feet; tt,=M south 52. 5,91 45" West 254..f,8 fleet to a point x. Soutb boundary of said Chautauqua Unit No. 1, >e^t:x B; thence ftrtt. 3y' 42' 45" East, along said Sou.y boundary, 314.95 -Te--t to the Point of Begimimg, _ t- ject to right-tf-way for fifth Avemm Mott and _.r.: Street Best, per said plat of t2mutauqua Unit No. _. -ALL- Ust-parr- t,^ p -r'tior..of-luts. 8, 9,. 10_$t+d i?_iJ=?E Nast of the Ea=_t rlgut-iT va; boundary of U. S. E'-E -wmy llo. 19, Lat•s 21 Thr7ugh 1c, both Imclusive, Rlocc 26; a ;Lot 12 111cck 27, Chautauqua Unit No. 1, Section a, fr, the of he Mi cif Section 31, T:-wship 23 5au. , Mange 1$ East, tccgetber vi-Lb the platted streets thereto, per -plat reco_-ded in Plat Boor 9, Pege i(, -Records of Pire°_lat Io+anty, Florida and that uE^. portion of L.ta 25, 25 end 24, Block 5; Lots 1, 2, ti, .23, 24, 25 and 2:, Bl,r_k 4; Tots 1, 2, 3, 4, 23, 2-, 25 26, clock ?,; .Ott 1, 2, 3, 4, 23, 24, 25 aad 25, Bl'.ck e; and Lots 1, 2, J, L•, 23, 24, "L5 and 2$, Block i, s1.` b t:Lne it Unit 2, section A, Chautauqua, in the i* of -re 3;"-' of Section 32, Twnship 23 SoutL, Range 15 East, tae`_ tr vith platted vtree.z ad3acent thereto, per pl.. mcc is In Plat Book 9, Paee 1',, Public Records of Piz e? _a County, Flori,5a, lying vithir. *.he following 3ez_r__ =i :_: Beginning e. a _roint .n tl a Ikrth boundary cf Ut-i. 2, Section A, r-l:autauqua, as recorded in Plat Bcock Page 146 of the Public Becords or Piaallar Ctranty, Florida, Borth %' 23' 21" Fast 30 feet frcm the Nark- west corner of zaid. Chautauqua for a Point of Beginr.:zg; thence North 59. 230' 21" Bast 178 feet; thence Soutt ro` 17' 39" East 1.13 fee:.; thence South 0' 18' 12" Eris. 1052.58 feet; thence South 629 59' 45" West 511.$2 f st to the Easterly right-Dr-vsy line curve of U. S. H.{,-my ;.8.1518 MCA PARCEL C _ .:a:.s. 'in: ttinj 1:e: :to,: r:G 3n: rr.!:.u_ .. the center li a ur sai= sktt cr-:e tt ng .'wn- MVe a :E:_ - •+ Cf+.?} fEE:; :ht nct - N`?GYL.'S:IeS:eY?: al:ng ?ai3 ?Ia?:t: .inC• t1:-,t a C.•.:r3 yrt'4r- irg ari Ustante r f 55 - wts: 1;5.GI .get; thence : ar:t 92' 5?' +5 FA-"". +l: fte : j t3.tnce N:.r h !J" 18' 12" Wes% alcre _'.e FA-..:.f Firs: Street «Eat as per plat referrer to a_.:e a•.. ;.a_allei :.4! Wes: boundary of Ur.!- N: 2, .S,ec:=on A, ::atatauque, a Vint which is C.13 feet from : hei N tr th bo'sr. art of suit Urit M. 2, Section. A, Chautauqua; Aente North G' i?' ;i" Wear. 0.18 feet to the Point of Begir- ing, subject to rights- of-way for Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Nint!. "I ler.,h Avenues North, and Firs: Street i:ea:, per sa;d'40 of 0%autauqua Unit No. 1, Section. E, and Ur.i. N.. 2, Section. A, Chautauqua. PARCEL D A strip of lard ?M feen i:. witch in . E S i of- SEc ti.n 29, Tovrs't.i; 21 Sou::, . tnge•:A East, n.re arti:+; trly describe. as f4uovs: beginning at the Southwest corner of .he Sk* :f said Section. 29, TGvrship 28 South, Ffcrge A bast; thence North 0' 1;' 19" West &Isng tl:t West bcr nUry of said 94.1, of Sectior. 29, 2658.20 feet :c the Nov.hvest corner of the said SWi, said point also being Gn the center line of State Road N:. 5,90; :.ye na! Iior: 013' 22' G3" Sast along the center•1Sne-of Sate zReai Nr,-•550, : -feet; tkAnce South a" 15' l." East 1.2j f_et; :terse South L' 17' D" Sast parallel to the West t :radar y of Eaid S4 .f Sec- tion 29, P6M.581 : ee : tc a poin : Gn the South' baunUry of said S* cf Section. 23; : -nte South 3y' 234' 21" West 208 feet tG the Pain: of Beg_r :ir .; LESS A."M rEYCEPT :he right-of-way of S:fi_e ..:a: 53;. The conveyance herein is subject t. the Granters, t'rtir heirs ar.! assigns, reset-ring :e f.iloving rights in ar.3 to the tract of lat.: :Freinatvve de-rcrite3 as Percel L: The right to bu::a, _sintair, and t_ avel over, roils and streets acress the =aii tree: of land, Fr:Vi3e3 wuc.. r *%A.s -tree :_ fl) do r.o raise grwn-1 eleva:i:n, (2) are mr.=try: tea across to sal: -r&4' :f luny aL_ '•V! .Etely ptrpei4tculer tc a East art ?ESt tcL!:ar--tn. thereof, an't' _tarts :f v ich are Lore thar. 25 feet listant frx any :f Grartee's lir.e strictures or related equipment, facilities or accessory thereto. TOGETHM vith a. l t o tereren:s, :?ereditaments ar.3 appurtenances, with every privilege, rig_, title, Interest ar.d estate, d.ver and right of dower, reversion, remainder and easement thereto belonging or =. anywise appertaining; TO SM ARD TO SOLD the same in fee simple forever. A,: t-e said Parties of the First Part do covenant with the said Party ---I -ht Second Part that they are lawfully seised of the said premises, that they are free of all iacumbrance, and that they have good right a:'- lawful authority to sell the same; and that said Parties of to F_•s- Part do hereby rvll ? warrant the title to said land, and will defers-1 the some against VA lairful claims of all persons whomsoever, prov_ se!, ho'+ever, the warranties herein are limited as to the interest of BARBARA GIDSM IA MST, a single woman, her grantees, heirs an: ass'_gns, in and to that portion of Lots 12, 13, 14 and 15, Block 26, Chwutwaqus, Unit AO. 1, Section B, according to plat thereof recorded in Pla: L:ck 9, Page 57, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, lying vi*.ii the leads hereioabove described as PAP.CEL C. IN W12M 5 yam, the said Parties of the First Part .ave hezwuato.set.tbeir.haads and seals the day and year-above .-- Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: l 8. Koch 6AMIA A-2 ? 'rjA- L.S.) Paula Koch _w 1 ? ' 96 ) sa. I BAMT CIRTM, Mat On this -v L tk day of 1962, before see personally appeared CARL R. MM and PAULEA KOM, his i vift, to we known to be the persons described in and xho executed the i i tftegdim cmve7mmee to !loalm POTiPAt CMPORAMOIff, sad severally ackmwledged the execution thereof to be their free act and deed for the I mme and parpoves therein aationed. VI"ESS mW signature and official seal at Fi ,tier!/ in the Bounty of and State of I,??5. , the day and year last aforesaid. -Fulbllc- Notary Ib Ooiaiasion Expires; K,,, PA&1 state of gv-.& at Ulp -hy Comm;csi` El=+a Dec. 1i. IM a-za w A-k- F- a c.-+. 9% EXHIBIT B WESTFIELD COUNTRYSIDE MALL Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Section B. Description of Request Countryside Mall is the only regional mall located within the City of Clearwater as well as the only regional mall located in north Pinellas County. Westfield now proposes to continue its efforts to dramatically improve this regional mall by adding additional shopping opportunities, a state-of-the-art movie theater complex, and restaurants through the submittal of a flexible development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. With this proposed mall addition, Countryside Mall will have the only first-run movie theater in the City of Clearwater. The proposed expansion will bolster the mall's function as the premier shopping and entertainment destination for North Pinellas County. Countryside Mall was constructed in the early 1970s as the commercial center of U.S. Homes' residential development of the area now known as "Countryside." Although development of the site was reviewed through Pinellas County, the mall and the Countryside area was later annexed into the City of Clearwater. The Countryside Mall site is now constrained by roads on three sides and residential development on the fourth side. Without the ability to expand beyond its current borders, redevelopment of the existing site is the only option to improve this important commercial destination. Further complicating the redevelopment efforts is the fact that commercial site landscaping was not the standard development practice when the mall was constructed approximately 40 years ago. For this reason, Countryside Mall does not fully comply with the City's current requirements for perimeter landscaping and internal parking lot landscaping. One of the most critical aspects to a successful mall is the availability of free and easily accessible parking for its customers. Therefore, the priority guiding this redevelopment is to maintain the current parking ratio on the mall while providing new landscaping in areas that does not reduce parking spaces. The solution proposed in this Comprehensive Infill application is to carefully balance the critical need for parking while recognizing the city's desire for landscaping in visible areas on the site. Please refer to the details of the proposed new landscape plan as contained in the companion Comprehensive Landscape Program. Simultaneously with this Flexible development application, the applicant has submitted a Comprehensive Landscape Program application and a Comprehensive Sign Program application to address those specific subject areas of the proposed redevelopment. Page 1 of 11 August 13, 2010 255215v2 Specifically, the applicant requests flexible development approval of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project to permit an addition of 68,567 square feet composed of movie theaters, retail uses and restaurants in the Commercial ( C) district with the following development standards: a. Lot area of 80.896 acres (3,523,825 square feet); b. Lot width of 1,700 feet, m.o.l.; c. A maximum height of 55' 1" above average elevation to the midpoint of the roof and 63' above average elevation to the top of the lattice; an increase in the parapet height to 4'8" on the west side of the building and 8' on the east side of the building; and decorative lattice work extending 4' above the parapet at the southeast corner of the building addition; d. A front setback (north) of 52' to buildings and 0' to other structures; e. A front setback (south) of 83.4' to buildings and 5.4' to other structures; f. A front setback (west) of 199.7' to buildings and 6.2' to other structures; g. A side setback (east) of 285.9' to buildings and 5.5' to other structures; h. A parking ratio of 4.4 parking spaces per 1,000 gross floor area or 5,719 parking spaces including 91 handicapped spaces; i. Approval of a two-year development order. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. Countryside Mall is the anchor of a commercial area that serves both the Countryside residential area as well as the residents of North Pinellas County. The proposed redevelopment of the mall is consistent with this intense commercial node as well as the City's goals to redevelop existing commercial centers. The FAR of the expanded Countryside Mall is proposed as 0.39, where an FAR of 0.55 is allowed in the Commercial General (CG) plan category. The proposed ISR is .899 where .90 is the standard in the CG plan category. The existing and proposed ISR at the high end of the allowable standard is due to the fact that the mall was constructed approximately 40 years ago prior to the perimeter buffering and landscaping provisions of today's code. In addition, the stormwater management area for the mall is located off-site to the north of the mall which further accentuates the calculation of the ISR. The existing mall building in the vicinity of the theater addition ranges in height from 39 feet to 47.4 feet. The project proposes a height for the building addition of 55' 1" to the midpoint of the roof and 63' to the top of the lattice. The project also proposes a parapet above the roof with an increased parapet height of 4'8" on the west side of the building and 8' on the east side of the building. Additionally, Page 2 of 11 August 13, 2010 255215v2 the project proposes to construct a decorative non-structural grill extending 4' above the parapet at the southeast corner of the building addition to serve as an architectural emphasis. Exhibit C is included in this submittal which illustrates the proposed building height, parapet and decorative grill in a Cross Section Through the Proposed Theater. Exhibit D, Average Elevation Exhibit, is also included in this submittal package to demonstrate the calculation of the average elevation over the eighty acre site. Exhibit D was prepared by Florida Design Consultants pursuant to professional surveying methods and it demonstrates that the average elevation of the site is 84'6". As required by the City's definition for "height," the height of the building addition is measured from this average elevation. The proposed height is lower than and consistent with the 64' 4" height approved by the City in 1999 for the expansion of the Macy's and Dillard's department stores. In addition, this height is necessary to accommodate the stadium style seating and movie theater operations on the second floor of the addition and to maintain an adequate height for the first floor of retail and restaurant uses. Finally, this height is necessary so that the theater addition can be seamlessly integrated on each floor to the two stories of the mall for pedestrian access which will help to reinvigorate the mall. Having the theater attached to the mall is certainly preferable to locating it on an outparcel. The mall building and proposed addition are located a substantial distance from Countryside Boulevard (296') and U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road (609') which will greatly minimize the potential visual effect of the height. Page 3 of 11 August 13, 2010 255215v2 The table below describes the land use category, zoning and existing uses on the parcels adjacent to Countryside Mall. Vicinity of Countryside Mall Location Land Use Zoning Existing Use Category North ROR, RU City of Dunedin Retail and restaurant (across SR 580) uses from us Highway 19 to east of Summerdale; BFs Warehouse;Residential from BF s to east property line (City of Dunedin) South CG and RH C Countryside Square (Across shopping center; 4 Countryside story Multifamily Boulevard) residential development East RM and RU MDR Multi-family residential development West CG and R/OG C and O Office, Lowe's, retail (Across U.S. and restaurants Highway 19) 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Countryside Mall is located at the center of an intense commercial area in North Pinellas County. The proposed addition is not expected to have any negative effects on the ability of the mall's commercial neighbors to redevelop and/or continue their commercial activities. In fact, in recent years, there has been commercial redevelopment in the vicinity of the mall, including the Countryside Square improvements located directly south on Countryside Boulevard. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The applicant has submitted a Traffic Study, described in detail in Response 4 below, that confirms that the mall addition will not impact the adjacent Page 4 of 11 August 13, 2010 255215v2 roadway network. Additionally, the retail nature of the proposed mall addition is not expected to adversely the health or safety of employees or residents in the area. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. A traffic study was prepared by Roy E. Chapman, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc., dated August 13, 2010 and is included in this submittal. The traffic study was prepared after consultation and agreement with the City staff on the methodology for the study. The Traffic Study concluded that each of the signalized intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS D in the future year with the project traffic; and Countryside Boulevard between Enterprise Road and SR 580 will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS C in the year 2013 with project traffic. Countryside Mall currently has access to three streets: SR 580 on the north, Countryside Boulevard on the south and U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road on the west. There are no planned revisions to the access driveways for the project and there will continue to be a total of eleven driveways for customers to access the site. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Countryside Mall currently operates as the center of a commercial node in this part of North Pinellas County. This commercial area is characterized primarily by retail and restaurant uses. The residential development in the vicinity of the mall is separated from and buffered by existing rights-of-way, roadways, a utility corridor and by its location which is a substantial distance from the mall building. It should be noted that the regional mall, the residential development and other uses in the area were part of a master plan for the community when U.S. Home developed the Countryside area and were master planned to coexist together in harmony. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The companion Comprehensive Landscape Program application details the improvements in perimeter landscaping and at the base of the freestanding signs that are proposed by the applicant. As is shown on the enclosed architectural drawings, the proposed addition will be well integrated with the existing mall with creative interesting signage used to accent and announce the theater addition. Due to the mall's location a substantial distance from adjacent uses and property lines, no adverse acoustic, olfactory or hours of operation impacts are expected on adjacent properties. Page 5 of 11 August 13, 2010 2ss215v2 Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Proiect Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. There are only two areas of flexibility requested in this application and without this flexibility, it would not be physically possible to construct the theater addition within the confines of the mall property. The two deviations requested are, first, to increase the building height to 55'1 " to the midpoint of the roof and 63' to the top of the lattice; second, to allow parking at a ratio of 4.4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Additionally, the applicant requests a two-year development order due to market conditions. Hei ht As described above, the two-story theater addition is proposed at a height which will be compatible with the existing mall for pedestrian flow between the two floors of the theater addition and the two floors of the existing mall. The height of the addition is also necessary to accommodate the stadium seating and theater operations on the second floor. It should also be noted that the height of the existing mall is approximately 45 feet so the addition will be constructed at a height of approximately 20 feet greater than the current building. In 1999, the City approved a height of 64' 4" for the two department store expansions which height is virtually the same as the current request. The variety in height will serve to accentuate the major elements of the mall such as the major department stores and the theater while maintaining consistency of architectural design. The proposed addition is designed to be located a substantial distance from both adjacent roadways with a setback of approximately 296 feet from Countryside Boulevard and 609 feet from U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road to the addition. These substantial setbacks minimize any possible adverse impact on surrounding properties. As outlined in the companion Comprehensive Landscape Plan, the additional landscaping along Countryside Boulevard will improve the aesthetics of this edge of the mall property and create a "greener edge" between the roadway and the mall parking. Parking As described above, the availability of free, accessible parking for patrons is a critical part of success for all malls and theaters. Therefore, this project has been designed to maximize parking and maintain the same ratio of parking with which the mall currently operates. The proposed parking ratio of 4.4 spaces per 1,000 gross floor area is the same ratio as the City approved in the 1999 expansion plans when the two department stores expanded for total new retail space of 146,000 square feet. This same parking ratio has been Page 6 of 11 August 13, 2010 2552152 maintained by realigning parking aisles and spaces for a more efficient layout in three major parking areas. Since in many locations, the parking area lacks the landscaping required by today's codes, the applicant has proposed a companion Comprehensive Landscape Program application. The proposed landscape plans add new plant material and trees where physically possible within three renovated parking fields of the mall. In addition, the applicant proposes new landscaping in several key visible areas: along Countryside Boulevard, and at the site of each freestanding pylon and monument sign on both Countryside Boulevard and SR 580. Although this project is not of a size that would trigger compliance with the City's landscape code, the addition of landscaping materials and trees in these visible areas will make a positive improvement in the mall's presentation to its customers. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. All of the proposed uses of movie theater, retail and restaurants are permitted uses in the Commercial General plan category as well as the Commercial zoning district. Additionally, on the Citywide Design Structure adopted in the Future Land Use Element, Countryside Mall and its environs have been designated as an Activity Center, one of only five such centers in the City. The three largest Activity Centers on the Design Structure are the Downtown, Clearwater Beach and the Clearwater Industrial Park. The remaining two Activity Centers are the commercial nodes of U.S. Highway 19 and SR 60 intersection containing the new outdoor Clearwater Mall and the Countryside Mall area located at U.S. Highway 19, Countryside Boulevard and SR 580. The application is consistent with Goal A.5, Objective A.5.1 and specifically Policy A.5.1.1 of the Future Land Use Element which describes an Activity Center as "high intensity, high density multi-use area designated as appropriate for intensive growth and routinely provide service to a significant number of citizens of more than one county." The redevelopment of Countryside Mall is clearly consistent with this Activity Center designation as well as with the City's directive for intensive growth for an Activity Center and the Center's ability to serve residents of multiple counties. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed project is compatible with its commercial area as more particularly described in General Applicability Criteria 1 and 2 and will not impede additional improvements to surrounding properties. Page 7 of 11 August 13, 2010 25521sv2 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The proposed project is a major commercial use within a designated Activity Center and is located within an area historically known as the commercial node of North Pinellas County. Three of the property's borders are formed by major roadways and the fourth edge is multi-family development with a significant setback between the residential buildings and the mall of over 700 feet. The mall building's location in the center of its parking area creates a significant buffer by the distance of the building from the property edges, thus minimizing any negative effect on adjoining properties. As also described in more detail in General Applicability Criteria 6, adjoining properties will not be negatively affected by this project. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. The proposed project meets Criteria 5 a, b and c above and discussed here. The proposed uses of retail sales, restaurants and movie theaters are all permitted uses in the Commercial zoning district (Criterion 5a). The proposed expansion of the mall will diversify the mall activity and energize the property further as an entertainment destination. The addition of movie theaters to the mall is expected to draw new and additional customers to the property and will also create jobs to operate all of the new businesses in the addition (Criterion 5b). The proposed project will allow Countryside Mall to operate at a higher level as a major retail center that contributes to the City's economy (Criterion 5c). Page 8 of 11 August 13, 2010 255215v2 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; The proposed mall addition is permitted in this Commercial zoning district and is consistent with the retail character of this commercial node. As discussed in more detail in General Applicability Criteria 1, the proposed project will not impede the development or improvement of surrounding properties. b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the city; There are no applicable design guidelines at this location. However, the project has been carefully and sensitively designed to coordinate with the existing mall building and with features that create an inviting and energizing entertainment center. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; The property's development as a regional mall created an intense project that has been maintained and improved over time. The existence of Countryside Mall has encouraged the development of this area with other intense commercial land uses over the years. This addition is consistent with the historically established character of this commercial area as evidenced by the recent City designation of this site as being within an Activity Center. d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: i. Changes in horizontal building planes; ii. Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; iii. Variety in materials, colors and textures; iv. Distinctive fenestration patterns; v. Building stepbacks; and vi. Distinctive roof forms. Page 9 of 11 August 13, 2010 255215v2 The proposed building has been carefully designed to complement the existing mall while creating a visually interesting addition to this shopping and entertainment destination. The addition has been designed in the modern architectural style to provide design continuity with the existing mall while incorporating varying design elements to create an interesting and attractive appearance. Specifically, the proposed mall addition extends south from the existing mall in a two-story rectangular form to emphasize the location of the addition that includes movie theaters, new shopping and restaurant opportunities. The southeast corner of the addition has been designed to draw attention to the theater entrance through the use of lattice work in horizontal bands running from the sign frieze on the first floor to the top of the building. The lattice work is located on the south and east facades of the building joining each other at the southeast building corner. Located on top of the lattice work is a four-foot high decorative grill that serves as a "finial" to the building and completes this architectural feature. As mentioned above, a sign frieze has been designed at the top of the first floor which provides the backdrop for the attached signage announcing the new shopping and restaurant tenants. This frieze is proposed as a consistent color throughout the east, south and west facades and will provide a continuous design element for the addition. The frieze continues at the same height along the existing southwest mall entrance to unify the addition with the existing building. As can be seen on the enclosed building elevations, a variety of coordinated materials have been proposed to create architectural interest. The smooth finish of the EFIS panels on each facade is contrasted with lattice work, the sign frieze and the glass storefront on the east and south facades of the first floor. Within the EFIS facades, horizontal and vertical reveals are proposed to visually divide the facade and assist in creating a pedestrian scale. As described in detail in the companion Comprehensive Sign Program, the attached signs on the building have been carefully designed and located to be integrated with the architecture and to animate the theater addition through their design, color and shape. The first floor of the addition is intended to be an inviting pedestrian activity area featuring storefront windows from floor to ceiling. In addition, the project proposes an outdoor plaza on the south and east sides of the addition to allow for outdoor seating for restaurants and a gathering place for customers. The design proposes planting areas between the outdoor plaza and the parking area to provide a separation between pedestrians and vehicles in the parking area. Page 10 of 11 August 13, 2010 255215v2 e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The project proposes to improve the Countryside Boulevard perimeter landscaping and enhance the planting areas around the freestanding pylon and monument signs (See Comprehensive Landscape Program application for details). Due to the mall building's location in the center of the property, there are significant distances currently existing between the mall and its commercial neighbors. Page 11 of 11 August 13, 2010 255215v2 LT-OP OF PARAPET - 143'6" 4'8" TOP OF ROOF =_138'10"_ _ (WEST SIDE) AVERAGE SITE _EL = 84'6" FFE = 78'0" ROOF LINE EL = 140'6" MID POINT OF ROOF EL=139'7" L0 PROPOSED THEATRE TOP OF DECORATIVE LATTICE = 147'6" -? TOP OF PARAPET =-143'6"__T 8'0" TOP OF ROOF = 135'6" _ 1 (EAST SIDE) CROSS SECTION THROUGH PROPOSED THEATRE (T) n.t.s. 1 FXHIRIT J:\362\Data\Dwgs\Exhibits\362-BUILDING CROSS SECTION.dwg - Aug 11, 2010 0 8:25am - jbeckman FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS a PLANNERS 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Pori Richey, FL 34655 Tel: (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 LB 6707 DATE: 6/30/2010 REVISIONS: _ , JOB #: 2009-56 1) ADD ROOF TO PARAPET DIMENSION DRAWN: JEB 2) REVISED HEIGHT DIMENSIONS PER CHECKED: CT DRC COMMENTS 8-12-2010 u J _ N - ----------- D sD TDa 20 B ® I i N, N, _- - V I I A VAA1111111111 ? ? ---- - ,a°'' ? / ! T ? , - / , =r-- ` A ( I \I I\ \1 I / I\ -/?!/S I l 11 y // ,_i 1V ! I I I II 1 I ! l I' 1 ? I I \V r II \I I r Il I I 1 II 1 1 ?,? I \,/ \ / 1 I I I / \ \ /`v v AVERAGE ELEVATION = 84.5' (NAVD 88) vv (SEE NOTE #6) l r I I I I l l/ i A V I 1 I I I I 1 ?-,' I / I , / ? 1 I 1 I I l I / \ }} 1 I , I 1 1 I A 1 // 1 1 1 // 1 I / I?? I I I ?-I A I - d? / i--v 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - _ / 1 \ 1VAVAVAA VAAVA-- /? ?? ? 1? \1 I f-?v l 1 I IlllllAlVAV_ ?` _-, ????? ? V I ?i -_ I _, _ I I i r` ) I ?__ / /)11111111\ ? ? - v /,ice wv v? v/ I \ / / , _, - __r Till I / - - / 1 a) NOTES. 1) CONTOUR DATA SHOWN HEREON WAS PROVIDED BY JESSICA HENDRIX OF THE SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) ON 8/12/2008. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). FIELD DATA FOR THE CONTOURS WAS COLLECTED BY SWFWMD N MAY 1999 AND SEPTEMBER 2000 UTILIZING LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING (LIDAR) TECHNOLOGIES. 2) PROPERTY LINES SHOWN HEREON ARE FROM THE PINELAS COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISERS WEBSITE AND ARE SUBJECT TO AN ACCURATE BOUNDARY SURVEY. 3) AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WAS OBTAINED FROM THE LAND AND BOUNDARY INFORMATION SYSTEM (WWW.LABINS.ORG) WEB SITE, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY TAKEN IN MARCH, 2008. 4) THE TOTAL MALL AREA (LESS BUILDINGS) WAS CALCULATED FROM THAT CERTAIN GEORGE F. YOUNG, INC. ALTA/AGSM LAND TITLE SURVEY TITLED 'COUNTRYSIDE MALL JOB NUMBER 96-17-0860-0I, LAST REVISED 2/05/2002, BY SCALING THE BUILDING LIMITS AND REMOVING THE BUILDINGS FROM THE TOTAL MALL AREA. TOTAL MALL AREA (LESS BUILDINGS) BEING 2,742,268 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. 5) A SITE VOLUME OF THE MALL AREA (LESS BUILDINGS) ABOVE THE ZERO ELEVATION PLANE WAS CALCULATED UTILIZING THE AVERAGE OF COMPOSITE AND GRID METHODS. THE VOLUME OF THE MALL AREA (LESS BUILDINGS) BEING 231,713,136 CUBIC FEET, MORE OR LESS. 6) THE AVERAGE ELEVATION OF THE MALL AREA (LESS BUILDINGS) WAS CALCULATED BY DIVIDING THE SITE VOLUME OF THE MALL AREA (LESS BUILDING) ABOVE THE ZERO ELEVATION PLANE BY THE TOTAL MALL AREA (LESS BUILDINGS). AVERAGE ELEVATION BEING 84.5 FEET (NAVD 80), MORE OR LESS. PREPARED FOR, SHEET DESCRIPTION, x 20;9-56 EB LORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. WESTFIELD, LLc r AVERAGE ELEVATION EXHIBIT 362 . JEB ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS 2730 University Boulevard, Suite 900 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Wheaton, MD 20902 EXHIBIT DNONE 3 , JEe Tel: (727) 849-7588 - Fax, (727) 848-3648 0„i 9 c. JEB E.B. No. 7421 Oa,E wEwoM 1218109 c STATE ROAD 580 SEARS p ? %9 y G 'N s s v? Lo C?l d cr= ®® z g 1 SEARS ® ® °? r THEATRE GOP a GOP 01, ? ® c® em I ?i l DILLARD'S G ® ® B . _ J.C. PENNEY MALL 1p o I -? DON OLSON c::D GOOD o ° ° _.../ MACYS I COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD J: \362\Data\Dwgs\Exhibits\362-COLOR GRAPHIC OF PROPOSED SITE.origlnal.dwg - Aug 11, 2010 @ L 24pm - jbeckman ftoRma MR coxsucraNrs, K Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental June 29, 2010 Mr. Scott Rice, P.E. Engineering Assistant Director of Production City of Clearwater Engineering Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Suite 220 Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Countryside Mall/Theater Addition . Drainage Computations Dear Scott: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. (FDC) has finalized the Site Plan and other documents pertaining to the proposed theater addition to Countryside Mall. All documents will be submitted to Scott Kurlman in the Clearwater Planning Department in the next few days, however, I thought it would be appropriate to submit the drainage analysis for the project directly to you. Please note the following concerning this addition to Countryside Mall. On December 9, 2009 FDC staff met with David Kramer, P.E. at the Tampa office of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). A copy of the pre-application minutes, as prepared by David, are attached. Please note that, as outlined in the "water quantity discussions" and "water quality discussions", SWFWMD's only concern is the additional roof area created by the theater addition. Also, although minor revisions will be made to the existing parking lots in the northwest and southeast quadrants of the mall (fire hydrant relocation, landscape island relocation, restriping of the area, and some minor increase to the asphalt surface area) SWFWMD considers these areas to be exempt from their review. 2. Two (2) copies of the full Site Plan, and two (2) copies of the Drainage Analysis are enclosed. Please note that the additional surface area of the roof of the proposed theater encompasses approximately 38,447 SF (see Basin Area Exhibit attached to the Drainage Computations). Water quantity/quality issues created by this area are addressed in the proposed dry detention area to be located in the southwest corner of the site. The asphalt area draining to this proposed dry detention area is approximately 41,714 SF, and the rate of discharge from the surface area draining to this dry detention area is 6.62 CFS in the pre-development condition and 3.89 CFS in the post-development drainage condition (24 hr/25 year). 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com Mr. Scott Rice, P.E. June 29, 2010 Page 2 3. The southwest portion of the Countryside Mall parking lot contains approximately 12.2 acres of surface area, and fourteen (14) drainage inlets. (See Sheet 4 of 16 for existing conditions). In the proposed conditions, as shown on Sheet 7 of 16, there are a total of nineteen (19) drainage inlets, and since the expanded building roof area drainage is accommodated by roof drains that connect directly to the proposed drainage system, the nineteen (19) drainage inlets accommodate less surface area. 4. Stormtab calculations are included for Inlets 3-1, 3-2 and 3-3 that convey the drainage from a portion of the existing parking lot to the proposed dry detention area. However, a stormtab analysis is not provided for the remainder of the system since it was agreed previously to eliminate this type of analysis due to the fact that considerable acreage drains through the Countryside Mall site from not only the U.S. Highway 19 right-of-way, but also the commercial development south of Countryside Mall, Countryside Boulevard right-of-way, etc. We believe that the additional inlets, especially those to be located in the vicinity of the proposed theater, will accommodate the surface runoff more quickly and easily than the existing drainage system. Please let me know if you have any questions concerning these revisions to the drainage system within the southwest area of Countryside Mall. As soon as we receive approval from SWFWMD, we will provide you with a copy of that approval. Thank you for your assistance during the past several months concerning our approach to the expansion of this area of Countryside Mall. Sincerely, Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E. President :es - k:kountryside mall\letterskice.do" Enclosures c: Rebecca Gagalis, Westfield, w/o Encl. Scott Titmas, Westfield, w/o Encl. Larry Dalton, w/Encl. Bryan Fast, P.E., w/o Encl. Jay Hunting, w/o Encl. File 2009-0056-80.02 THIS FORM IS INTENDED TO FACILITATE AND GUIDE THE DIALOGUE DURING A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING BY PROVIDING A PARTIAL "PROMPT LIST- OF DISCUSSION SUBJECTS. IT Is NOT A LIST OF REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE APPLICANT. FILE NUMBED: SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ' RESOURCE REGULATION DIVISION PRE-APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Date: 12/9/09 Time: 10:00 Project Name: Countryside Mall Attendees: David Kramer, Jay Hunting, Ed Mazur FDC County: Pinellas Sec/Twp/Rge: 30/28/16 k Total Land Acreage: 80+ Project Acreage. 1.0 Prior On-Site/Off-Site Permit Activity: f • N/A - - Project Overview: O Redevelopment of a portion of the existing mall. • Addition of a movie theatre over existing building and parking and parking improvements in a current green space along SR 580. • Will also include restripinq and minor landscape revisions within existing parking areas (exempt activity), Environmental Discussion: (Wetlands On-Site, Wetlands on Adjacent Properties, Delineation, T&E species, Easements, Drawdown Issues, Setbacks, Justification, Elimination/Reduction, Permanentlremporary Impacts, Secondary and Cumulative Impacts, Mitigation Options, SHWL, Upland Habitats, Site Visit, etc.) No apparent wetlands or surface waters on-site. Site Information Discussion: (SHW Levels, Fioodplain, Tailwater Conditions, Adjacent off-Site Contributing Sources, Receiving Waterbody, etc.) Site discharges to Curlew Creek. Mav be imDaired. Water Quantity Discussions: (Basin Description, Storm Event, Pre/Post Volume, Pre)Post Discharge, etc.) • Demonstrate that the discharges from the project area will not cause any adverse impacts - site is highly impervious and improvements will be mostly over existing impervious surface. Limit the post-development 25-year, 24-hour discharge rate at all outfall locations to the pre-development 25- year, 24-hour discharge rate (see comment above). Demonstrate that site will not impede the conveyance of contributing off -site flows. Water Quality Discussions: (Type of Treatment, Technical Characteristics, Non-presumptive Alternatives, etc.) • Provide water quality treatment for entire new project area (area to be demolished and reconstructed) and all contributing off-site .flows - not applicable to the minor parking restriping and landscaping improvements. a Treatment is only required for the Movie theatre expansion and the former bank site. In addition, if the project discharges to an impaired water body, must provide a net environmental improvement. • Applicant must demonstrate a net improvement for the parameters of concern by performing a prelpost pollutant loading analysis based on existing land use and the proposed land use. a Will allow compensatory treatment for currently untreated runoff - must have an equal or greater area and equivalent Dollutant load. Sovereign Lands Discussion: (Determining Location, Correct Form of Authorization, Content of Application, Assessment of Fees, Coordination with FDEP) • N/A Operation and Maintenance/Legal Information: (ownership or Perpetual Control, O&M Entity, O&M Instructions, Homeowner Association Documents, Coastal Zone requirements, etc.) Provide proof of ownership in the form of a deed or contract for sale. Provide appropriate 0&M instructions. Provide a detailed construction surface water management plan. Application Type and Fee Required: • ' General Construction ERP - $800.01 1456.00 > mid December 2009) - Sect. A, C and E of ERP ADDlication. Other: (Future Pr&Application Meetings, Fast Track, Submittal Date, Construction Start Date, Required District Permits - WUP, WOD, Well Construction, etc.) Disclaimer: The District ERP pre-application meeting process is a service made available to the public to assist interested parties in preparing for submittal of a permit application. Information shared at pre-application meetings is superseded by the actual permit application submittal. District permit decisions are based upon information submitted during the application process and Rules in effect at the time the application is complete. Countryside Mall Treatment Volume Required Treatment of 1/2" Per Acre: Required Treatment for 38,447 sf = 1602.0 ft3 Treament Depth: Area at Pond Bottom (elev. 72.6') 1786 ft2 Area at Elevation 73.5 2657 ft2 1786 ft2 + 2657 ft2= 4443 ft2 4443 ft2 /2= 2221.50 ft2 Treatment Volume Provided: 0.80 ft * 2221.5 ft2- 1777.2 ft3 Top of Treatment Volume is elevation 73.4' Area Draining to Pond: 41,714 ft2 + 21,075 ft2= 62,789 ft2 or 1.44 Ac K:\362\ProjData\DrnData\Spreadsheets\[362CN.xlsj1 Countryside Mall EPN 362 Name Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs Dummy-Pre BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 74.00 0.00 74.0000 0 12.08 6.62 0.00 0.00 Outfall BASE 25yr-24hr 0.00 70.00 70.00 0.0000 0 12.51 3.89 0.00 0.00 Pond BASE 25yr-24hr 12.51 75.77 76.50 0.0050 5966 12.08 6.62 12.51 3.89 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Countryside Mall EPN 362 --_= Basins Name: Mall-Post Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area (ac) : 1.4-40 Curve Number: 98.00 DCIA(%): 0.00 ---------------------------- Name: Mall-Pre Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 1.440 Curve Number: 98.00 DCIA(%): 0.00 Node: Pond Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 15.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------------------------------ Node: Dummy-Pre Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph CN Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 15.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 Nodes Name: Dummy-Pre Group: BASE Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 74.000 30.00 74.000 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ------------------------------------------------ Name: Outfall Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Group: BASE Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 70.000 30.00 70.000 ----------------------------------------------------- Name: Pond Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Group: BASE Type: Stage/Area Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 -------------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 70.000 Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 -------------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 72.600 Warn Stage(ft): 76.500 Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 72.600 0.0420 73.500 0.0630 77.000 0.1770 Drop Structures Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 2 Countryside Mall EPN 362 Name: Outfall From Node: Pond Group: BASE To Node: Outfall UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Invert(ft): 70.900 67.500 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure Outfall *** Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 4.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Invert(ft): 73.400 Control Elev(ft): 73.400 TABLE Hydrology Simulations Name: 25yr-24hr Filename: K:\362\ProjData\DrnData\25yr-24hr.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 5.00 Routing Simulations Name: 25yr-24hr Hydrology Sim: 25yr-24hr Filename: K:\362\ProjData\DrnData\25yr-24hr.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Time Step optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Boundary Stages: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- -------------- 30.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Patch: No Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Flows: Length(ft): 240.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Automatic Solution Algorithm: Most Restrictive Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Solution Incs: 10 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 2 Countryside Mall- Southwest Pond SIDE-DRAIN FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS E h ^h V ^V Lmin Lmax Lavg HYD. AREA FLOW AVG. ^T ET NGVD TOTAL INCR. TOTAL INCR. GRAD. FILTER Q=KIA FLOW INCR. TOTAL 73.40 2.05 XX XXXXXX 1,742 XX XXXXX C 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0250 23.0 127.8 XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX 0 0 XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXXXX 202 XX XXXX X XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX 123 1 1 6 XX . XXXXXX 73.32 1.97 XX XXXXXX 1,540 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.9850 22.2 118.5 X . XXXXXX C XX . XXXXXX 1 6 XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXXXX 196 XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XX XXXX-XX X XX)UUU(C XX XXXX X X XXXXXX C 114.1 1 7 XX . XXXX X 73.24 1.89 XX XXXXX C 1,344 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.9450 21.4 109.6 X XXXXXXX XX . XXXXXX 3 4 XXX)UUUCjC XX XXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXXXX 190 XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XX XXXXX C X XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX 105.3 1 8 XX . XXXX X 73.16 1.81 XX XXXX X 1,154 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.9050 20.6 101.0 X XXXXX X XX . XXXXXX 5 2 XXXXXXXX XX XXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXXXX 184 XX XXXXXX XX XXXX X XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX 96.9 1 9 XX . XXXXX C 73.08 1.73 XX XXXXXX 970 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.8650 19.8 92.8 X XXXXXXX XX . XXXXXX 7 1 XXXXXXXX XX XXXXX C 0.08 X XXXXYM 177 XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX 88 9 2 0 XX . XXXXXX 73.00 1.65 XX XXXXXX 793 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.8250 19.0 85.0 X . XXXXXXX XX . XXXXXX 9 1 XXXXXXXX X XXXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXXXX 171 X XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXX C XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX 81 2 2 1 XX . XXXXXX 72.92 1.57 XX XXXXXX 622 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.7850 18.2 77.4 X . XXXXXXX XX . XXXXXX 11 2 XXXXXXXX X XXXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXXXX 165. X XXXXXX C XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX 73.8 2 2 XX . XXXXXX 72.84 1.49 XX XXXXXX 457 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.7450 17.4 70.3 X XXXXXXX XX . XXXXXX 13 4 XXXXXXXX X XXXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXXXX 159 X XXXXX CX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX X XXXXXX C X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXX 66.8 2 4 XX . XXXX X . 72.76 1.41 X XXXXXXX 298 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.7050 16.6 63.4 X XX)UUUUC XX . XXXXXX 15 8 XXXXXXXX X XXXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXX X 152 X XXXXXXX XX XXXXXX X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXX 60.2 2 5 XX . XXXXX C 72.68 1.33 X XXXXXXX 146 XX XXXX X 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.6650 15.8 56.9 X XXXXXXX XX . XXXXXX 18 3 XXXXXXXX X XXXXXXX 0.08 X XXXXXXX 146 X XXXXXX C X XXXXXX C X XXXXXXX XXXXXXX < X XXXXXXX X XXXXXXX 53.9 2 7 XX . XXXXXX „ 72.60 1.25 X XXXXXXX 0 XX XXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.6250 15.0 50.8 X XXXXXXX XX . XXXXXX 21.0 73.40 DLW (TOP OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 72.6 NWL (BOTTOM OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 71.35 ELEVATION OF CENTERLINE OF PIPE 2570 AREA @ DLW (s.f.) 1786 AREA @ NWL(s.f.) 2 L min 2 L max 5.42 "K" (f lhr.) 10 REQUIRED UNDERDRAIN LENGTH K:\362\ProjData\DrnData\Spreadsheets\[Filter Drain.xlsjCountryside Mall 21.0 TIME FOR SYSTEM TO DRAW DOWN (24 HOURS BASED ON CITY OF CLEARWATER CRITERIA) 6/23/2010 STORM SEWER HYDRAULICS Page: 1 System: SW Pond PROJECT - Number: Organization: FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS Outfall Tailwater El: 73 60 Storm Event IDF C CONDITIONS Description: Countrysi de Mall Designed by: Exit Loss at Outfall: . 0 00 Z - urve Runoff Coeff. d efault Coun : Pinellas-Clearwater Checked b : Storm Sewer Control El . 73 65 one Fre uenc Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 . 6 10 0.95 0.00 0.00 HGL method: Standard FDOT (Jum p HHGL crown FROM TO Draina e Ar T . S g eas c Travel Inten. Total Flow (cfs) Inlet Elevations Pipe Elevations Pipe HGL Flow Velocit a acit Mani tation Offset Area Runoff C*A Lcl CA Time CA Qb Sum(Qb) Inlet HGL HGL Height % T e y Act l p 'N' Type Brls Len Coeff UpStr CIA Min HGL Crown Line 4 Width FL yp ua Ph sica A) C CA Tot CA min in/hr ac TOTAL Clear. Jnc Loss Flow Line in % f f 3-1 3-3 0.29 0.95 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 75.10 74.21 74.21 74.15 15.00 0.0631 FUII s 1 43 c s 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.78 6.38 0.27 1.76 0 00 74 35 74 15 . DBI-C 1 3 2 94.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 1.76 . 0.89 0.00 . . 73.10 72.90 0.200 15.00 0.2128 2 63 3.23 0.01 - 3-3 0.59 0.95 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.00 76.30 74.51 74.51 74.15 0.361 15.00 0 2614 FUII . 2 92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.79 6.38 0.56 3.58 0 00 74 55 74 15 . . DBI-C 1 3 3 138.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 3.58 . 1.79 0.00 . . 73.30 72.90 0.400 15.00 0.2899 3 07 3.77 0.01 - Pond 0.28 0.95 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.00 75.90 73.95 73.95 73.65 0.300 18.00 0.5172 Partial . 5 20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 15.79 0.00 6.25 1.10 6.89 0.00 74.40 74 10 criti l . DBI-C 1 58.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 6.89 1.95 0.00 . 72.90 72.60 0.300 18.00 0.5172 ca 4.63 8.18 0.01 Units: ENGLISH Automated Storm sewer Analysis & Design (ASAD), copyright 1992-2006, Hiteshew Engineering Systems, Inc. Ph: (352) 383-4191 Portions of ASAD were developed by Kenneth J. Leeming, P.E. at International Engineering Consultants, Inc. T60v11.RPT 10114/2003 Countryside Mall Revised Traffic Study Submitted to: City of Clearwater Prepared for: Bellwether Properties of Florida 11601 Wilshire Boulevard, 11th floor Los Angeles, CA 90025 Prepared by: Roy E. Chapman, P.E. FL P.E. No. 34438 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, FL 34655 Date: August 13, 2010 Project No. 2009-0056-40.06 cHA,F, A 1W ?oRO ,? 1.0 Introduction Countryside Mall is an existing regional mall located in Clearwater, Florida. Countryside Boulevard borders it to the south, US Highway 19 to the west, and State Road (SR) 580 to the north; see Figure 1, project location map. The proposed project is to remodel and expand the existing regional mall, which has 1,229,549 sq. ft. of shopping center, by constructing a two-story addition. A total of 35,102 sq. ft. of shopping center will be added on the first floor of the addition. The second floor will provide a 12-screen movie theater that will be created by using the second floor of the addition and remodeling 21,898 sq. ft. of the existing shopping center. At the completion of construction, the property will contain 1,242,753 sq. ft. of shopping center and a 12-screen movie theater. This study has been prepared to review the traffic impact on the surrounding transportation network as a result of the project. 2.0 Traffic Methodology A meeting was held with City of Clearwater staff on April 29, 2010 to discuss the methodology to be followed in completing this traffic study. The agreements reached at the methodology meeting were transmitted to City staff in a letter dated May 5, 2010; see a copy in the Appendix. 3.0 Study Area Based on discussions at the methodology meeting the following signalized intersections and highway links were included in the study area: Intersections: Countryside Blvd at Enterprise Road Countryside Blvd at the U.S. 19 signalized intersection Countryside Blvd at the Countryside Mall Entrance Road Countryside Blvd at S.R. 580 Highway Links: Countryside Blvd (Enterprise Road to SR 580) 4.0 Background Traffic As agreed upon in the transportation methodology meeting, the study period would be on a Saturday during the peak hour of the Countryside Mall traffic. In order to determine when the peak hour for the mall occurs on a Saturday, machine counts were taken. Twenty-four hour machine traffic counts were taken on Saturday May 15, 2010, at the 5 most active project driveways; see counts in the Appendix. From these counts the peak traffic hour was determined to occur at two time periods. One was between 1:30 and 1 2:30 p.m. and the other was between 1:45 and 2:45 p.m. Based on these times, an E-mail message was sent to City of Clearwater staff recommending a count period between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m.; see copy in the Appendix. The City approved these times and the turning movement counts were taken on Saturday, May 22, 2010. These counts were taken at each of the four signalized intersections in the study network. Subtotals were taken every 15 minutes, and the highest four consecutive 15-minute periods were established as the peak hour; see count sheets contained in the Appendix. The Saturday p.m. peak hour occurred at different times at the intersections counted, with a range of times between 1:00 p.m. and 2:45 p.m. The peak hour counts were adjusted to annual average operating conditions using the seasonal factor from the FDOT 2008 Peak Season Factor Category Report; see copies of the counts and FDOT report for Pinellas County in the Appendix. The resulting p.m. peak hour turning movement counts on a Saturday are indicated in Figure 2. Based on the traffic methodology meeting it was agreed that traffic in this portion of Clearwater is not increasing. A zero percent growth rate was used in this study. 5.0 Project Traffic The following procedure was used to determine the new net external trips that will be generated by the project. Trips for the proposed land use on the site were determined based on information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) informational report Trip Generation, Eighth Edition, 2008. Table 1 indicates the trip generation for the existing and proposed land uses on the Countryside Mall site for a Saturday during the peak hour of the generator (mall). According to the ITE Trip Generation report, the existing shopping center generates 4,378 peak hour trips. The proposed total shopping center and movie theater would generate 5,127 peak hour trips. Internal capture between the shopping center and movie theater land uses on site have been estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Second Edition, June 2004, procedures. As indicated in Table 2, the movie theater and shopping center land uses would have an internal capture of 5.6 percent. Since this is below the limit internal capture of no more than 20% of the trips generated, the internal capture calculated for this land use mix is considered acceptable. This reduces the trips generated by 288 internally captured trips. Pass-by capture to the new shopping center addition would reduce the new trips on the highway. The calculation of pass-by trips was completed using the formula for the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. The pass-by capture rate was based on the total size of the shopping center, once it is expanded. No reduction for pass-by capture was used for the movie theater land use. As indicated in Section A of Table 3, the future total of 1,242,753 sq. ft. shopping center would have a capture rate of 13.8%. Applying this rate to the increase in shopping center traffic results in a pass-by capture of 2 inbound and 2 outbound trips. This amount was checked to make sure that it is less than 10% of the background traffic on the adjacent road, Countryside Boulevard. As indicated in Section B of Table 3, the Saturday traffic on Countryside Boulevard is 1,254 vehicles and the 10% limit would allow no more than 125 pass-by trips. Since the ITE formula would 2 only allow 4 additional trips, this amount was used in the analysis. This results in net new trips of 243 inbound and 214 outbound trips, as indicated in Table 1. 6.0 Project Traffic Distribution The distribution of project traffic was based on a review of the machine count data and engineering judgment. Countryside mall is served by eleven project entrances. One entrance each to Countryside Boulevard and S.R. 580 are signalized. In order to simplify new project traffic assignment to the mall, the new trips were assigned through the two signalized driveways. The two-story addition to the mall will be located on the south side of the existing buildings, just east of the Sears department store. The parking lot at that location provides an entrance to the first story of the addition. The north side entrance to the mall provides its access to the parking lot from the second floor of the mall. Therefore, much of the traffic destined to the movie theater will park on the north side of the mall to enter on the same level as the theater. The new project trips are therefore, expected to have 60% of the new trips park in the south lot and 40% park in the north lot. The resulting distribution of new project trips is shown in Figure 3. As agreed upon in the methodology, the buildout analyzed was for the year 2013. The background and project trip assignment for that year is indicated graphically in Figure 4 and the individual turning movements at the four signalized intersections analyzed are indicated in Table 4. 7.0 Analysis The study area intersections were analyzed based on the existing and buildout traffic volumes as indicated above. The Synchro computer program was used to review the operation of these signalized intersections. As indicated in Table 5, each of the signalized intersections in the study area currently operates at an acceptable Level of Service D (LOS D). With background and project traffic in 2013, all of the intersections analyzed will also operate at an acceptable LOS D. Copies of the Synchro runs are contained in the Appendix and are provided on CD with this report. The operation of the highway link of Countryside Boulevard between Enterprise Road and S.R. 580 has also been reviewed. The distance between these intersections is approximately one mile. Because the first signalized intersection on the highway segment would be deleted from the link, there would be three intersections per mile. The 2009 FDOT Quality/Level of Service Handbook was used to determine the maximum service volume for LOS D along this highway link. The maximum service volume for the peak direction of travel for an Urban Area using the maximum service volume for a state signalized arterial with between 2.0 and 4.5 signals per mile, reduced by 5% to account for Countryside Blvd. being a County Road, results in a maximum volume of 2,546 vehicles (2,680 x 0.95) at LOS D. The off-peak direction was calculated using the same procedure as indicated above, with a calculation first for the two-way volume and then subtracting the peak direction volume. These maximum volumes are indicated in 3 Table 6. Copies of FDOT 2009 Q/LOS Handbook Tables 4 and 7 are provided in the Appendix to document these calculations. The individual road segments between the signalized intersections were reviewed to determine the maximum traffic traveling in the peak and off-peak directions of Countryside Blvd. for the existing and future conditions. These volumes are indicated in Table 6. The volumes were then compared with the acceptable levels and it was determined that Countryside Blvd. will operate at an acceptable LOS C in the peak and off peak directions, both for the existing traffic volumes and for the future year with total traffic volumes. 8.0 Driveway Access None of the existing driveways are proposed to be modified. 9.0 Conclusion Based on the above review of traffic operations discussed above, it is concluded that: Each of the signalized intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS D in the future year with the new project traffic and The highway link of Countryside Boulevard from Enterprise Road to S.R. 580 will operate at an acceptable LOS C in the year 2013 with project traffic in both the eastbound/northbound and westbound/southbound directions. Because the project will not degrade the impacted transportation network below acceptable levels, the proposed project should be approved as submitted. TA362\ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Traffic Study.doc 4 SR 580 rn .11L 132 912-? 87 EI i O rn ? a a ??N O a lp Y z 9 c Ul ti5 7' $9 k k kk s 11? k" ? y v I k? ?:I DATE: 6-3-10 L 93 919 276 7tr MDR co % -40 4 g ? 10- v y ?O ? m r GO J??? g 57 347 N rnir - 38 N 316 745 -? 124 NOT TO SCALE LEGEND XX - BACKGROUND TRAFFIC FIGURE 2. EXISTING (2010) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS (SATURDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR) PAGE 6 0 FLOFdDA DEMN CONSULTA M INC ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS S PLANNERS ?N ?O ?O o ? •s N NOT TO SCALE LEGEND XX - INBOUND PERCENT PROJECT TRIPS (XX) - OUTBOUND PERCENT PROJECT TRIPS FIGURE 3. PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENT 0 N PAGE 7 Fl OMADE r?rCaMTAMS, W. DATE: 6-3-10 Lim E MKK iMW04M WALnTS, SURMON a rLAf ERE 0 0 ?rn L 93 f 919 (14) 276 (22) M ^^ 0- M 03 n ?M Fy???A y?`O? ` ?yo ?9 ?` ?yol x ?? f FIGURE 4. 2013 TRIP DISTRIBUTION =j DATE: 8-11-10 PAGE 8 N NOT TO SCALE XX - BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (XX) - PROJECT TRIPS [XX] - PASS BY TRIPS L Fl OFEA DESWCONBULrANM WC ENOWSM, ENVINONYWAWlT6 IMEMNE E nAMFAS Table 1. Countryside Mall - Shopping Center and Movie Theater Trips Saturday PM Peak Hour of Generator PM Peak Hour Phase Land Use ITE LUC Size Units Inbound Outbound Total Existing Trip Gen Existing Shopping Center 820 1,229,549 Sq. Ft. 2,277 2,101 4,378 Proposed Trip Gen Shopping Center 820 1,229,549 Sq. Ft.. Shop Ctr Deleted for Movies 820 -21,898 Sq. Ft.' Shop Ctr 1 st Floor Addition 820 35,102 Sq. Ft. Proposed Shop Ctr 820 1,242,753 Sq. Ft. 2,293 2,116 4,409 Multiplex Movie Theater 445 12 Screen 373 345 718 Total 2,666 2,461 5,127 Internal Capture (144) (144) (288) External Trips 2,522 2,317 4,840 Existing 2,277 2,101 4,378 Increase 245 216 461 Pass-by to Shopping Center 2 2 4 Net New Trips 243 214 457 Date: Aug 13, 2010 T:\362\ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Revision 08112010\[Tables.xls]Trip Gen Sat Table 2. Internal Capture Saturday PM Peak Hour of Generator Land Use: Shopping Ctr (A) Size: 1,242,753 Sq. Ft. Total Internal External Enter 2,293 69 2,224 Exit 2,116 75 2,041 Total 4,409 144 4,265 % 100 3 97 423 459 75 69 75 69 Land Use: Multiplex Movie Theater (B) Size: 12 Screens Total Internal External Enter 373 75 298 Exit 345 69 276 Total 718 144 574 % 100 20 80 Net External Trips A B Total Enter 2,224 298 2,522 Exit 2,041 276 2,317 Total 4,265 574 4,840 ITE Trips 4,409 718 5,127 Internal % = 5.6 Sources: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, 2008 and FDC Date: Aug 13, 2010 T:\362\ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Revision 08112010\[Tables.xls]Int Capt Sat 10 Table 3. Shopping Center Pass-By Trips Saturday PM Peak Hour of Generator A. ITE Formula* Size Calculated Pass-by 1,242,753 Sq. Ft. 13.7 Percent Change in Shopping C Phase Size Existing 1,229,549 Proposed 1,242,753 Increase Percent Pass-by Pass-By Amount :enter Traffic Inbound Outbound Total 2,277 2,101 2,293 2,116 16 15 13.7% 13.7% 2 2 4 B. Street Traffic Check Countryside Blvd. Eastbound Background Traffic 869 Westbound Background Traffic 385 Total 1254 10% Limit 125 C. Pass-By Capture Used Inbound Outbound Total 2 2 4 Note: *From Figure 5.7 of ITE Trip Generation Handbook, June 2004 Date: Aug 13, 2010 TA362\ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Revision 0811201 0\[Tab1es.x1s]Pass-By Sat 11 Table 4. Intersection Turning Movements Countryside Blvd at N orthbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Enterprise Road Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Background Traffic 54 19 105 13 12 64 41 688 22 19 583 19 New Project Trips 1 2 33 1 30 1 Total 54 19 106 15 12 64 41 721 22 20 613 20 Countryside Blvd at N orthbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound us 19 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Background Traffic 239 143 372 409 77 54 170 404 50 444 489 225 New Project Trips 37 36 36 33 32 32 Total 239 143 409 445 77 54 170 440 50 477 521 257 Countryside Blvd at N orthbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Mall Entrance 1 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Background Traffic 149 41 35 73 27 236 316 745 124 38 347 57 New Project Trips 5 28 4 97 109 31 Pass-by Trips 1 1 1 1 Total 149 46 35 102 31 334 426 745 124 38 347 89 N Countryside Blvd N orthbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound at SR 580 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Background Traffic 63 178 315 99 186 180 132 912 87 276 919 93 New Project Trips 9 19 10 10 9 12 22 14 Total 63 187 334 99 196 190 141 924 87 298 933 93 Date: Aug 13, 2010 TA362\ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Revision 08112010\[Tab1es.x1s]Turn Moves Table 5. Intersection Operation Summary 2010 Existing Traffic 2013 Total Traffic Intersection LOS Max V/C Delay (SecIVeh) LOS Max VIC Delay (Sec/Veh) Countryside Blvd at Enterprise D 0.69 44.1 D 0.70 44.0 Countryside Blvd at US 19 D 0.75 43.6 D 0.76 44.9 Countryside Blvd at the Mall Entrance 1 D 0.74 45.2 D 0.84 38.7 Countryside Blvd at SR 580 D 0.88 41.6 D 0.9 41.6 Source: FDC Date: Aug 13, 2010 TA362\ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Revision 08112010\[Tables.xls]Int LOS w APPENDIX RECEIVED P;,ROR/DA DESIGN CONSUITANIS, INC. 10 ?a 'Q Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering Land Planning • Environmental CITY OF CLEARWATER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT May 5, 2010 Mr. Himanshu Patni, P.E. City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Room 220 Clearwater, FL 33756 Mr. Robert Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Dept. 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Countryside Mall - Meeting of April 29, 2010 Dear Messrs. Patni and Tefft: We thank the City staff for meeting with us in the afternoon of April 29, 2010 to discuss the methodology for a traffic study to review the impacts of a proposed expansion of the Countryside Mall and other issues affecting the planned expansion of the Countryside Mall. The attendees are indicated on the attached sign-in sheet. The items discussed and agreed upon for the traffic impact study are as indicated in the following paragraphs and follows the outline used at the meeting. A. Study Time Period The time period to be used for the study was discussed. Based on the review of trip generation information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) informational report Trip Generation, it was determined that the greatest impact from the proposed multiplex movie theater would be in the peak hour of the generator on a Saturday. It was agreed that the traffic study would identify and study the Saturday peak hour of generator. In order to identify the peak hour of generator, machine traffic counts will be taken to include the hours the mall is open on a Saturday. (It is expected that counts will be taken to include the two signalized entrances to the mall, one on S.R. 580 and the other on Countryside Boulevard, to determine the peak hour for existing mall traffic.) The hourly information will be provided and discussed with City staff before the peak hour of the generator is established to allow peak hour turning movement counts to be taken. (It is expected that the intersection turning movement counts will obtain up to three hours of counts, with 15-minute subtotals. The highest four consecutive 15-minute periods will be taken as the peak hour.) B. Project Traffic Project traffic will be estimated using information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Tables 3, 4, and 5 as presented at the transportation methodology meeting, see attached, addressed trip generation, internal capture, and pass-by capture for the additional development at Countryside Mall. These calculations will be used in the traffic analysis. 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com A-1# Mr. Himanshu Patni, P.E. / Mr. Robert Tefft, Planner III May 5, 2010 Page 2 C. Study Area The study area will include Countryside Boulevard and the following signalized intersections along this road: Enterprise Road, U.S. 19, the signalized mall entrance drive east of U.S. 19, and S.R. 580. Highway link and signalized intersection analysis will be needed within the study limits. D. Traffic Counts Turning movement traffic counts will be taken at the signalized intersections identified above to bracket the Saturday mall peak hour as determined in paragraph A above and as will be agreed upon with City staff. The counts will be taken for approximately three hours using the 15- minute summary technique as discussed above. The existing peak hour traffic will be determined based on these traffic counts. The peak hour counts will be adjusted to annual average operating conditions using the Peak Season Factor Category Report from the FDOT 2008 Traffic Information CD. Signal timings will be obtained from the City (Corey at 727-562-4777). E. Trip Distribution Trip distribution for new project trips will be based engineering judgment using information from the traffic counts taken for this project, the location of project driveways, and the location of the new land uses to be constructed at Countryside Mall. F. Analysis Considerations The growth in background traffic on roadways near the project was reviewed based on future year traffic projections contained on the FDOT 2008 Traffic Information CD. As indicated in Table 7, attached and the backup information from the Traffic Information CD, also attached, the growth in background traffic projected by FDOT is 0% for U.S. 19, 0% for S.R. 580 west of U.S. 19, 1.4% for S.R. 580 east of U.S. 19, and 0% for S.R. 580 west of McMullen-Booth Road. Based on these growth rates and discussion with City staff, a growth rate of 0% will be used for this traffic study. It was indicated that the buildout analysis would be completed for the year 2013. G. Analysis Techniques It was agreed that the signalized intersections would be analyzed using the Sychro program. Another issue discussed at the meeting was: H. Signal Warrant Study The need for a traffic signal warrant study was discussed for the intersection of Countryside Boulevard at Village Drive. Following discussions with Paul Bertels of the City of Clearwater it was determined that this study would not be needed. A-z Mr. Himanshu Patni, P.E. / Mr. Robert Tefft, Planner III May 5, 2010 Page 3 Several planning issues were also discussed. They included: 1. Parking Study The need for a parking study was discussed. Robert Tefft of the Planning Department stated that since the proposed parking ratio is higher than that previously accepted for the Countryside Mall, a parking study will not be required. J. Landscaping It was indicated that code landscaping can be placed in the islands to be relocated for the revised parking lot layout. The relocated islands will be approximately the same size as the existing islands. No additional perimeter landscaping will be required. K. Light Pole Locations The existing light poles in the parking lots can be relocated to similar locations as their current positions. No additional buffering needs to be constructed. Roy E. Ch an, P. . Vice President of Transportation :es - k:kxountryside malhictters`.patni tefR.docx The traffic methodology indicated above in Items A through H is acceptable to the City of Clearwater staff. ,p By: _41& / Date: Conditions: The planning issues discussed above in Items I through K are acceptable to the City of Clearwater staff. By: Date: Conditions: c: Paul Bertels, City of Clearwater Scott Kurlman, City of Clearwater Bennet Elbo, City of Clearwater Rebecca Gagalis, Westfield Properties Scott Titmas, Westfield Properties Ed Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC File 2009-0056-40.06 #A-P41 L) V, Table 4. Countryside Mall - Shopping Center and Movie Theater Trips Saturday PM Peak Hour of Generator r PM Peak Hour Phase Land Use ITE LUC Size Units Inbound Outbound Total Existing Trip Gen Existing Shopping Center 820 1,229,549 Sq. Ft. 2,277 2,101 4,378 Proposed Trip Gen Shopping Center 820 Shop Ctr Deleted for Movies 820 Shop Ctr 1st Floor Addition 820 Proposed Shop Ctr Multiplex Movie Theater Internal Capture External Trips 820 1,229,549 Sq. Ft. -23,979 Sq. Ft. 33,400 Sq. Ft. 1,238,970 Sq. Ft. 445 12 Screen 2,288 2,112 4,400 373 345 718 Total 2,661 2,457 5,118 (144) (144) (288) 2,517 2,313 4,831 Existing 2,277 2,101 4,378 Increase 240 212 452 Pass-by to Shopping Center 4 4 9 Net New Trips 236 208 443 Date: April 28, 2010 T:\2009-0056\042910 Mtg\[Trip Generation.xls]Trip Gen Sat Table 5. Internal Capture Saturday PM Peak Hour of Generator Land Use: Shopping Ctr (A Size: 1,238,970 S q. Ft. Total Internal External Enter 2,288 69 2,219 Exit 2,112 75 2,037 Total 4,400 144 4,256 % 100 3 97 422 458 75 69 75 69 Land Use: Multiplex Movie Theater B) Size: 12 Screens Total Internal External Enter 373 75 298 Exit 345 69 276 Total 718 144 574 % 100 20 80 Net External Trips A B Total Enter 2,219 298 2,517 Exit 2,037 276 2,313 Total 4,256 574 4,831 ITE Trips 4,400 718 5,118 Internal % = 5.6 Sources: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Handbook, 2008 and FDC Date: April 28, 2010 T:12009-00561042910 Mtg1[Trip Gene ratio n.xls] I nt Capt Sat 4-1? Table 6. Shopping Center Pass-By Trips Saturday PM Peak Hour of Generator Size Calculated Pass-by 1,238,970 Sq. Ft. 47.5 Percent Change in Shopping Center Traffic Phase Size Inbound Outbound Existing 1,229,549 1,674 1,743 Proposed 1,238,970 1,683 1,752 Increase 9 9 Percent Pass-by 47.5% 47.5% Pass-By Amount 4 4 Date: April 28, 2010 T:\2009-0056\042910 Mtg\[Trip Generation.xls]Pass-By Sat A-? (6%3/2010) Roy Chapman - RE Countryside Mall - Traffic Study Page 1 `. From: <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> To: <RChapman@fldesign.com> Date: 5/21/2010 1:24 PM Subject: RE: Countryside Mall - Traffic Study Okay. Please proceed. -----Original Message----- From: Roy Chapman [mailto:RChapman@fldesign.com] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 12:53 PM To: Patni, Himanshu Subject: RE: Countryside Mall - Traffic Study Our count personnel will record the number of vehicles entering the intersections by 15 minute increments. We will determine the highest 4 consecutive 15 minute periods and identify them as the peak hour for use in the study. Roy E. Chapman, P.E. Vice President of Transportation Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Blvd. New Port Richey, FL 34655 Phone: 727-849-7588 Fax: 727-848-3648 Mobile: 727-804-5560 >>> <Himanshu.Patni@MyClearwater.com> 5/21/2010 11:54 AM >>> This is acceptable to us. Once you have the data will you take the busiest 60 minute period from the 1 PM-4PM period for analysis or do something else? Himanshu -----Original Message----- From: Roy Chapman [mailto:RChapman@fldesign.com] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 9:41 AM To: Elbo, Bennett; Patni, Himanshu; Bertels, Paul Cc: Ed Mazur; Rebecca Gagalis Subject: Countryside Mall - Traffic Study Good Morning. We are getting back to you prior to starting manual turning movement counts for the above project. Machine traffic counts were taken at five entrances to Clearwater Mall on Saturday, May 15, 2010. The attached Excel spreadsheets provide a summary of the counts by driveway. The counts include inbound and outbound totals and combined total trips by 15-minute increment. Hourly totals (sum of the previous four 15-minute increments) are also indicated. The driveways where counts were taken are indicated on the PDF site drawing. The counted driveways included the two signalized project entrances and the major intersections on Countryside Blvd., but did not cover all entrances to the mail. 14-F (6%3/2010) Roy Chapman - RE: Countryside Mall - Traffic Study Page 2 There were two time periods that tied with the highest hourly totals. They were from 13:30 to 14:30 and 13:45 to 14:45 (1:30 -2:30 p.m. and 1:45 to 2:45 p.m.) In order to obtain counts through the peak hour of the mall, it is proposed that manual turning movement counts be taken at the four signalized intersections from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. We propose to take these counts this coming Saturday, 5/22/10. Please get back to me to confirm that taking the counts between 1:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. are acceptable to the City. Thanks. Roy E. Chapman, P.E. Vice President of Transportation Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Blvd. New Port Richey, FL 34655 Phone: 727-849-7588 Fax: 727-848-3648 Mobile: 727-804-5560 J1 Countryside Mall Machine Traffic Count Summary at Five Project Entrances Count Taken: Saturday, May 15, 2010 Sheet 1 of 3 Time Interval Drive 1 Drive 2 Drive 3 Drive 4 Drive 5 Total Total Total Hourly End In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out Trips Totals 15 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 - 30 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 3 7 - 45 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 - 100 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 6 8 25 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 145 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 13 200 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 215 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 11 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 315 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 330 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 345 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 415 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 5 1 6 6 430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 445 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 10 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 515 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 530 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 3 7 11 545 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 11 600 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 12 615 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 4 4 8 20 630 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 7 2 9 22 645 1 2 8 1 0 0 3 1 4 0 16 4 20 38 700 4 2 2 2 0 1 3 0 0 1 9 6 15 52 715 4 3 5 0 0 0 4 1 2 3 15 7 22 66 730 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 4 1 6 8 14 71 745 5 0 4 0 0 0 8 2 9 1 26 3 29 80 t -1 Countryside Mall Machine Traffic Count Count Taken: Saturday, May 15, 2010 C k 4 7 i.F Z Time Interval Drive 1 Drive 2 Drive 3 Drive 4 Drive 5 Total Total Total v Hourly v End In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out Trips Totals 800 8 8 5 2 0 0 17 2 22 3 52 15 67 132 815 9 2 6 2 0 0 8 2 23 3 46 9 55 165 830 13 5 4 5 0 0 11 4 23 3 51 17 68 219 845 13 5 12 4 0 3 19 3 25 13 69 28 97 287 900 36 7 22 8 0 0 28 5 45 13 131 33 164 384 915 42 7 34 1 0 10 25 5 34 15 135 38 173 502 930 47 19 40 11 0 2 27 6 49 21 163 59 222 656 945 91 29 61 12 1 9 50 7 57 12 260 69 329 888 1000 118 19 41 12 2 14 57 10 65 17 283 72 355 1079 1015 101 19 47 26 1 16 58 7 61 32 268 100 368 1274 1030 94 47 59 31 2 17 44 11 67 56 266 162 428 1480 1045 96 51 71 45 0 15 65 16 71 29 303 156 459 1610 1100 105 72 44 47 1 32 80 20 79 48 309 219 528 1783 1115 98 88 50 48 4 28 41 25 60 47 253 236 489 1904 1130 113 91 56 41 1 29 78 22 55 69 303 252 555 2031 1145 120 99 76 51 2 43 88 16 75 73 361 282 643 2215 1200 125 91 70 58 3 38 56 27 62 61 316 275 591 2278 1215 120 87 73 57 3 32 70 21 65 63 331 260 591 2380 1230 108 109 67 62 0 42 67 29 67 60 309 302 611 2436 1245 120 99 75 62 2 27 72 30 90 64 359 282 641 2434 1300 113 111 55 59 6 39 80 35 84 47 338 291 629 2472 1315 131 71 67 61 3 35 85 31 64 78 350 276 626 2507 1330 118 86 59 46 0 45 73 30 65 77 315 284 599 2495 1345 119 103 59 58 5 32 91 35 77 47 351 275 626 2480 1400 139 103 89 69 3 41 60 37 62 69 353 319 672 2523 1415 93 108 56 77 1 58 60 35 72 76 282 354 636 2533 1430 103 127 67 65 2 40 68 30 67 51 307 313 620 2554 1445 108 110 54 58 1 46 81 32 52 84 296 330 626 2554 1500 101 115 54 57 2 66 86 30 51 67 294 335 629 2511 1515 100 103 47 65 2 53 73 36 65 60 287 317 604 2479 1530 117 98 49 49 2 47 70 41 44 54 282 289 571 2430 1545 85 120 71 65 2 41 60 28 57 63 275 317 592 2396 1600 128 109 53 55 0 51 60 30 62 69 303 314 617 2384 1615 101 123 60 83 3 58 94 32 64 70 322 366 688 2468 1630 1 1 91 121 59 49 1 46 50 30 42 61 243 307 5-5-0-- F-2447 Countryside Mail Machine Traffic Count Count Taken: Saturday, May 15, 2010 Sheet 3 of 3 Time Interval Drive 1 Drive 2 Drive 3 Drive 4 Drive 5 Total Total Total Hourly End In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out In Out Trips Totals 1645 107 104 62 53 1 37 56 30 61 78 287 302 589 2444 1700 93 94 43 69 0 51 39 38 55 69 230 321 551 2378 1715 85 119 46 60 3 70 72 38 34 67 240 354 594 2284 1730 89 90 27 62 1 46 45 20 39 65 201 283 484 2218 1745 90 114 42 48 0 31 48 23 47 64 227 280 507 2136 1800 84 94 33 60 2 23 39 27 56 65 214 269 483 2068 1815 80 84 39 60 1 59 44 27 41 67 205 297 502 1976 1830 84 100 30 41 0 27 42 22 51 52 207 242 449 1941 1845 86 76 32 37 0 36 32 15 43 38 193 202 395 1829 1900 72 97 31 58 0 33 48 24 30 51 181 263 444 1790 1915 82 97 39 47 3 79 37 17 30 47 191 287 478 1766 1930 74 89 40 42 0 37 19 23 33 34 166 225 391 1708 1945 63 72 13 52 2 39 21 22 25 45 124 230 354 1667 2000 71 93 24 50 2 27 29 13 30 29 156 212 368 1591 2015 53 102 24 37 1 35 24 23 19 40 121 237 358 1471 2030 52 71 17 38 0 25 15 16 14 28 98 178 276 1356 2045 20 97 9 35 0 32 3 18 7 37 39 219 258 1260 2100 21 117 4 77 0 40 6 15 6 55 37 304 341 1233 2115 14 139 1 41 0 53 5 14 8 44 28 291 319 1194 2130 13 47 5 25 0 47 0 13 7 29 25 161 186 1104 2145 10 39 2 15 0 17 3 6 3 18 18 95 113 959 2200 4 18 1 6 0 5 2 3 3 15 10 47 57 675 2215 2 11 1 6 0 5 1 2 1 4 5 28 33 389 2230 3 11 0 3 1 3 6 3 1 1 11 21 32 235 2245 0 3 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 2 1 10 11 133 2300 2 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 0 1 6 9 15 91 2315 1 8 0 1 0 3 0 2 1 0 2 14 16 74 2330 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 2 4 46 2345 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 4 6 41 2400 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 30 Notes: Time based on a 24 hour clock Hourly Totals= Sum of 4 preceeding 15 minute periods Not all mall driveways counted T:\362\PrcjData\Traffic Counts\[5-15-1 0_Count_Sum.xls]Sheet1 PM PEAK HOUR DATA PROJECT: Countryside Mall PROJECT NO: 2009-56 LOCATION: (N-S) Enterprise Road & (E-W) Countryside Blvd DATE: Saturday, May 22, 2010 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny LANE TYPE: SPEED LI MIT: NB 1L NB 35 SB 1L SB 35 EB 3L EB 40 WB 3L WB 40 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB ES WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 1:00-1:15 14 5 27 3 3 17 11 177 6 5 150 5 422 422 1:15-1:30 13 5 26 3 3 16 10 170 5 5 144 5 406 828 1:30-1:45 13 5 26 3 3 16 10 172 6 5 146 5 409 1,237 1:45-2:00 14 5 28 4 3 17 11 183 6 5 155 5 435 1,672 2:00-2:15 12 4 24 3 3 15 9 157 5 5 139 4 381 1,631 2:15-2:30 13 4 24 3 3 15 9 157 5 5 140 4 382 1,607 2:30-2:45 11 4 22 3 2 14 8 142 5 4 126 4 346 1,544 2:45-3:00 11 4 22 3 2 13 8 140 4 4 125 4 341 1,450 3:00-3:15 10 3 19 2 2 12 7 121 4 4 112 4 299 1,368 3:15-3:30 10 3 19 2 2 12 7 123 4 4 113 4 304 1,290 3:30-3:45 9 3 18 2 2 11 7 115 4 3 107 3 286 1,230 3:45-4:00 10 3 19 2 2 12 7 118 4 4 110 3 294 1,183 141 49 275 35 31 169 106 1,774 57 51 1,566 50 3,121 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SIB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL PM L T R L T R L T R L -- T - - R VOLUME ------ ---- - 1:00-1:15 14 --- -- 5 ----- 27 --- 3 --- ---- 3 ------- 17 ------ 11 ----- 177 ------- 6 5 150 5 422 1:15-1:30 13 5 26 3 3 16 10 170 5 5 144 5 406 1:30-1:45 13 5 26 3 3 16 10 172 6 5 146 5 409 1:45-2:00 14 5 28 4 3 17 11 183 6 5 155 5 435 55 19 107 14 12 66 42 702 23 19 595 19 1,672 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 1:00 - 2:00 INTERSECTION PHF 0.96 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 1,672 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 181 PHF NB 0.96 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SIB 91 PHF SB 0.96 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 767 PHF EB 0.96 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 633 PHF WB 0.96 NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB L T R L T R L T R L T R 2010 Traffic Count 55 19 107 14 12 66 42 702 23 19 595 19 1,672 Seas onal Traffic 54 19 105 13 12 64 41 688 22 19 583 19 1,638 PM Peak Hour Trucks = 0.1% Note: 2008 Seasonal Factor = 0.98 Source: FDC Date: 6/4/2010 T:\362\ProjData\Traffic Counls\5-24-10 TMC1 Countryside TMC.xisjCountryside at Enterprise-SAT A -o; PM PEAK HOUR DATA PROJECT: Countryside Mall PROJECT NO: 2009-56 LOCATION: (N-S) US 19 Ramps & (E-W) Countryside Blvd DATE: Saturday, May 22, 2010 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny LANE TYPE: SPEED LI MIT: NB 1L NB 45 SB 1 L SB 45 EB 3L EB 40 WB 3L WB 40 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 1:00-1:15 52 33 77 78 35 20 34 121 18 99 126 37 730 730 1:15-1:30 65 33 95 89 21 18 33 103 17 100 92 46 712 1,442 1:30-1:45 61 43 91 87 21 10 49 102 9 109 102 62 746 2,188 1:45-2:00 71 26 94 120 20 13 39 85 10 105 139 55 777 2,965 2:00-2:15 56 39 87 101 28 16 40 116 15 126 113 62 799 3,034 215-2:30 56 38 108 109 10 16 45 109 17 113 145 51 817 3,139 2:30-2:45 63 27 95 74 25 21 41 83 11 108 92 44 684 3,077 2:45-3:00 60 28 79 84 21 9 36 97 8 109 101 36 668 2,968 3:00-315 53 36 101 92 20 11 37 107 11 108 122 32 730 2,899 3:15-330 63 26 92 77 9 7 48 96 13 120 127 50 728 2,810 3:30-3:45 49 39 72 76 21 11 36 109 8 86 105 46 658 2,784 3:45-4:00 69 24 92 65 20 1 33 103 14 141 115 38 715 2,831 718 392 1,083 1,052 251 153 471 1,231 151 1,324 1,379 559 8,764 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME 1:30-1:45 61 43 91 87 21 10 49 102 9 109 102 62 746 1:45-2:00 71 26 94 120 20 13 39 85 10 105 139 55 777 2:00-2:15 56 39 87 101 28 16 40 116 15 126 113 62 799 2:15-2:30 56 38 108 109 10 16 45 109 17 113 145 51 817 244 146 380 417 79 55 173 412 51 453 499 230 3,139 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 130-230 INTERSECTION PHF 0.96 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 3,139 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 770 PHF NB 0.95 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 551 PHF SB 0.90 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 636 PHF EB 0.93 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 1,182 PHF WB 0.96 NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB L T R L T R L T R L T R 2010 Traffic Count 244 146 380 417 79 55 173 412 51 453 499 230 3,139 Seasonal Traffic 239 143 372 409 77 54 170 404 50 444 489 225 3,076 PM Peak Hour Trucks = 0,4% Note: 2008 Seasonal Factor= 0.98 Source: FDC Date: 614/2010 T:13621ProjData\Traffic Countsk5-24-10 TMCgCountryside TMC.xls]Countryside at US19 Ramps-SAT A-111 PM PEAK HOUR DATA PROJECT: Countryside Mall PROJECT NO: 2009-56 LOCATION: (N-S) Mall Entrance & (E-W) Countryside Blvd DATE: Saturday. May 22, 2010 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny LANE TYPE: SPEED LI MIT: NB 1L NB SIB 1L SB EB 3L EB 40 WB 3L WB 40 PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 1:00-1:15 35 12 8 10 10 42 70 185 21 8 103 17 521 521 1:15-1:30 39 9 4 17 8 40 84 174 29 9 88 12 513 1,034 1:30-1:45 42 8 13 13 5 73 90 157 33 9 84 15 542 1,576 1:45-2:00 31 15 6 18 9 58 79 181 39 7 97 11 551 2,127 2:00-2:15 41 8 9 17 6 54 88 186 30 17 93 23 572 2,178 2:15-2:30 38 11 8 26 8 56 65 236 25 6 80 9 568 2,233 2:30-2:45 25 14 16 20 6 50 90 137 25 5 93 20 501 2,192 2:45-3:00 19 8 5 13 15 60 68 166 26 21 77 12 490 2,131 3:00-3:15 31 9 3 16 9 51 77 193 30 5 75 5 504 2,063 3:15-3:30 35 7 13 17 19 66 97 141 27 7 93 14 536 2,031 3:30-3:45 33 16 6 17 3 75 79 152 26 7 64 15 493 2,023 3:45-4:00 27 14 7 11 6 75 94 146 20 6 105 -- 11 522 2,055 -- ------ - 396 --- - 131 -- 98 ---- 195 -- -- 104 - ------ 700 ------ 981 ----- 2,054 --- 331 --- 107 - -- 1,052 164 6,313 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL PM L T R L T R L T R L T - - ---- R VOLUME -- - - 1:30-1:45 42 --- -- 8 ---- 13 --- 13 ---- 5 --- 73 ---- 90 ------- 157 33 ---- 9 - 84 15 542 1:45-2:00 31 15 6 18 9 58 79 181 39 7 97 11 551 2:00-2:15 41 8 9 17 6 54 88 186 30 17 93 23 572 2:15-2:30 38 11 8 26 8 56 65 236 25 6 80 9 568 152 42 36 74 28 241 322 760 127 39 354 58 2,233 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 1:30 - 2:30 INTERSECTION PHF 0.98 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 2,233 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 230 PHF NB 0.91 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 343 PHF SB 0.94 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 1,209 PHF EB 0.93 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 451 PHF WB 0.85 NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB L T R L T R L T R L T R 2010 Traffic Count 152 42 36 74 28 241 322 760 127 39 354 58 2,233 Seasonal Traffic 149 41 35 73 27 236 316 745 124 38 347 57 2,188 PM Peak Hour Trucks = 0.1% Note: 2008 Se asonal Factor = 0.98 Source: FDC Date: 614/2010 T:13621ProjDala\Traffic Counts\5-24-10 TMC\[Countryside TMC.xls]Countryside at Mall Ent-SAT PM PEAK HOUR DATA PROJECT: Countryside Mall PROJECT NO: 2009-56 LOCATION: (N-S) Countryside Blvd & (E-W) SR 580 DATE: Saturday, May 22, 2010 WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny LANE TYPE: SPEED LIMIT: NB 21 NB SB 21- SB EB 3L EB WB 3L WB PM PEAK HOUR COUNTS TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL HOURLY PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME VOLUMES 1:00-1:15 12 46 73 24 52 57 45 229 13 69 253 22 895 895 1:15-1:30 11 50 73 33 52 53 36 220 23 60 209 17 837 1,732 1:30-1:45 14 52 86 20 42 58 44 181 14 58 203 20 792 2,524 1:45-2:00 16 48 61 33 43 41 27 239 20 88 237 30 883 3,407 2:00-2:15 14 44 80 22 53 48 42 239 25 56 238 27 888 3,400 2:15-2:30 17 49 88 24 55 56 33 219 22 70 229 15 877 3,440 2:30-2:45 17 41 92 22 39 39 33 234 22 68 234 23 864 3,512 2:45-3:00 9 36 82 19 48 47 27 252 22 60 236 22 860 3,489 3:00-3:15 9 40 87 25 46 43 38 214 7 61 210 15 795 3,396 3:15-3:30 12 33 92 23 31 43 34 226 21 57 206 16 794 3,313 3:30-3:45 13 42 90 18 37 41 22 238 24 60 180 20 785 3,234 3:45-4:00 20 38 73 15 32 37 37 218 17 64 187 15 753 3,127 164 519 977 278 530 563 418 2,709 230 771 2,622 242 10,023 PEAK HOUR TIME NB NB NB SB SB SB EB EB EB WB WB WB TOTAL PM L T R L T R L T R L T R VOLUME 1:45-2:00 16 48 61 33 43 41 27 239 20 88 237 30 883 2:00-2:15 14 44 80 22 53 48 42 239 25 56 238 27 888 2:15-2:30 17 49 88 24 55 56 33 219 22 70 229 15 877 2:30-2:45 17 41 92 22 39 39 33 234 22 68 234 23 864 64 182 321 101 190 184 135 931 89 282 938 95 3,512 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR 1:45 - 2:45 INTERSECTION PHF 0.99 INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR VOLUME 3,512 PEAK HOUR VOLUME NB 567 PHF NB 0.92 PEAK HOUR VOLUME SB 475 PHF SB 0.88 PEAK HOUR VOLUME EB 1,155 PHF EB 0.94 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WB 1,315 PHF WB 0.93 NB NB NB SB SB SIB EB EB EB WS WB WB L T R L T R L T R L T R 2010 T raffic Count 64 182 321 101 190 184 135 931 89 282 938 95 3,512 Seasonal Traffic 63 178 315 99 186 180 132 912 87 276 919 93 3,442 PM Peak Hour Trucks = 0.6% Note: 2008 Se asonal Factor = 0.98 Source: FDC Dale: 6/412010 T:\362\ProjData\Traffic Counts\5-24-10 TMCQCountryside TMC.xIslCountryside at 580-SAT A---16 a a a) a E F 4) u 0 a (L) a JJ sa 0 a a w F1 T H 3 0 El bl F a) z u o ro o U U Si U) O 4 +P a U a row wz H q a 0 U) ,a c) a) O co Ln r-I X ro •• o a u 0 m W -o v o Ll N U N rn O w w U U O cn ? a w m w 0 ro Q X v v 3 I M m m Ln m ri co m m r m rn m O ri N M C Ln f, l` m m m O O N N M to C ?' C M % lD w w w w w m m ri .-I O O O O O O Ol M M Ol M Cl O O O O O O O O O O O .--I -i ri ri r-I rl ri ?-I rl fi ri ri o O O O O O r' C' O m [- an M N fi O m O •-l r-I N M C' ?I) lD [? m m m m O rl r N N M M C m to n u7 D N Ln In C Ln kD r l` )` l` r` r? O l o 0 o rn rn rn rn rn rn m m rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn rn rn m o o O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 c) 0 0 0 0 o 0 H N ri O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m ao Co m m oo W m m m m m [o Co W m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 C) C) C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ tf7 N 01 lD N 01 l0 M fi m In N 01 In N Ol l0 M O [, cr O .-1 ri N O O ri N O O rl N N O fi rl N O ri ri N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ fi H H H N N N N M M M M M d' C' CD CD to m O o 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I mmWmmWmmmmmmWWmmmmW m O o (D 0 C) 0 0 C) 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 C) 0 0 (D 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 C) 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I-i W M O N M O t` C' N C, \O M O l m O r C) W C) O O ri N N O -4 rl N O r-1 N M O rl N N O \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N N N N M M M M M C• C' C' C u7 ?n Lo (D C) 0 0 0 (D 0 0 C) 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 C) C) o O m m m m m CO W m m CO m 0] m f CO m m m m CA CC m m CA m RJ m m W W m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Cl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ d' H M N N 01 N N 01 lD M O M O r C) fi m ri m Ln N 6l lD M O r- (D ri N N O H ri N O O •-i N M C) O ?-i N N O r-i H N O O ?-l N N O H N N M M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N N CD? C, W CD C> r r W W m m m Ol 6l 61 O O O O H r-1 H H H N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O (D C) O O rl ri rl ri rl rl N rl ri rl rl r-1 rl fi m m fD m m CO C) m m m m m CD m CC m m C Cl O m m m m C) m m m m m m 0 0 C) 0 C) 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 Cl 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Cl N N N N N N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \ \ m N M \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ H W M C M O r M O ` C' C) C' H M C N-1?O N l0 M O r C' H W O O ri N N O •-i N N O .-i 1I N M M O rl N N O ri rl N O (D O ri N M O ri N N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ w CD CD Ww r r r r co m m m m Ol Ol 0 0 0 O O H H H r-1 rl N N N N OOCD OOOOOOOOOOOCD CD C> OO ri,-i,-i,-l,-i,-lH,-i,-1,-i,-i ri N M C' to w f? W m O r-I N M C' LO W l` m m Cri M C Ln 1D f- m Ol c) ?-1 N M C' in l0 1? m 6l O rl N M C' Lfl lD [- m m O rl N M N N N N N N N N N M M m m m m m m M M C' C' C' C V' C' C C' C' C' ul Lo r O O N ro (1) w V) o ro (D a) a 0) ro + CL . / Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Countryside Blvd & Enterprise Road 2010 Existing Traffic 5/27/2010 La e Grou EBL, `EBT "EBR MU-' WBT ; 1NBR .:i NBL NBT -, NBR SEL SBT ' SBE2 Lane Configurations tO tO Volume (vph) 41 688 22 19 583 19 54 19 105 13 12 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.995 0.995 0.873 0.874 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5060 0 1770 5060 0 1770 1626 0 1770 1628 0 FIt Permitted 0.278 0.206 0.705 0.673 Satd. Flow (perm) 518 5060 0 384 5060 0 1313 1626 0 1254 1628 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 0.95 43 43 No Left 1.00 15 Perm 6 40 999 17.0 0.95 0.95 724 23 747 0 No No Left Right 12 0 16 1.00 1.00 9 4 7 40 840 14.3 0.95 0.95 20 614 0.95 0.95 20 57 20 634 0 57 No No No No Left Left Right Left 12 0 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 Perm Perm 8 111 35 996 19.4 0.95 0.95 20 111 131 0 No No Left Right 12 0 16 0.95 14 14 No Left 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 15 Perm 2 67 35 993 19.3 0.95 0.95 13 67 80 0 No No Left Right 12 0 16 1.00 1.00 9 6 4 8 2 6 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 75.0 75.0 0.0 75.0 75.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 62.5% 62.5% 0.0% 62.5% 62.5% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 0.0% 68.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 7.5 7.5 4.0 7.5 7.5 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Min Min Min Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.8 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Countryside Mall T:12009-00561Synchro\Existing Countryside Mall.syn Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2010 Existing Traffic 1: Countryside Blvd & Enter prise Road 5/27/2010 # La-he p EEL EBT AIR- WBL WBT W NBL NBT NBR SBL' SBT SBf3 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.69 0.24 0.59 0.06 0.12 0.02 0.07 Control Delay 49.9 46.4 57.9 58.5 8.1 2.5 8.0 2.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.9 46.4 57.9 58.5 8.1 2.5 8.0 2.8 LOS D D E E A A A A Approach Delay 46.6 58.5 4.2 3.6 Approach LOS D E A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 196 16 188 14 5 3 3 Queue Length 95th (ft) 64 223 m29 231 34 30 12 23 Internal Link Dist (ft) 919 760 916 913 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 297 2904 220 2904 884 1131 844 1118 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.14 0.26 0.09 0.22 0.06 0.12 0.02 0.07 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 44.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: Countrvside Blvd & Enternrise Road m2 o4 - -- - =- - - 75 s" ob - - -- - - 45 75 s Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:12009-00561SynchrolExisting Countryside Mall.syn Page 2 d-1 q Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2010 Existing Traffic 5: Countryside Blvd & US 19 Ramps 5/27/2010 * Cane Group E6L - EST__ 7 EBR WBL WBT. : WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL , °SBT S Lane Configurations )) ttT M tO t r t r Volume (vph) 170 404 50 444 489 225 239 143 372 409 77 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.983 0.953 0.850 0.850 At Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 4999 0 3433 4846 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 4999 0 3433 4846 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 80 392 57 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 840 854 993 995 Travel Time (s) 14.3 14.6 15.0 15.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 179 425 53 467 515 237 252 151 392 431 81 57 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 179 478 0 467 752 0 252 151 392 431 81 57 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 18.0 26.0 18.0 26.0 18.0 23.6 23.6 18.0 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 50.0 26.0 0.0 50.0 26.0 0.0 18.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 41.7% 21.7% 0.0% 41.7% 21.7% 0.0% 15.0% 21.7% 21.7% 15.0% 21.7% 21.7% Maximum Green (s) 39.0 16.0 39.0 16.0 7.0 18.4 18.4 7.0 18.4 18.4 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.3 4.3 All-Red Time (s) 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 3.3 3.3 7.0 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 11.0 10.0 4.0 11.0 10.0 4.0 11.0 7.6 7.6 11.0 7.6 7.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min C-Min C-Min Min C-Min C-Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 11.6 18.0 21.8 28.2 17.5 14.7 14.7 25.8 23.1 23.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.18 0.24 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.22 0.19 0.19 Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:12009-00561SynchrolExisting Countryside Mall .syn Page 1 I+, -,& 0 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2010 Existing Traffic 5: Countryside Blvd & US 19 Ram ps 5/27/2010 Lane Group EBL EBT i BR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL ' SBT SBR v/c Ratio 0.54 0.62 0.75 0.63 0.51 0.66 0.73 0.58 0.23 0.16 Control Delay 73.1 29.0 61.7 43.5 52.0 63.7 13.2 47.9 44.1 12.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 73.1 29.0 61.7 43.5 52.0 63.7 13.2 47.9 44.1 12.5 LOS E C E D D E B D D B Approach Delay 41.0 50.5 35.1 43.8 Approach LOS D D D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 138 188 160 94 113 0 152 52 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 71 176 241 217 142 179 95 #294 105 39 Internal Link Dist (ft) 760 774 913 915 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1116 765 1116 1200 499 286 575 739 359 351 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.62 0.42 0.63 0.51 0.53 0.68 0.58 0.23 0.16 {ntersection Suinma Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay. 43.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Snlits and Phases: 5- Countrvside Blvd & US 19 RamDs 01 I o2 T 03 o4 1.8 26 s . :`. 50 s 26 05 I • 06 07 ¦- 08 1E; h. 50? Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:12009-00561SynchrolExisting Countryside Mall.syn Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2010 Existing Traffic 8: Countryside Blvd & Mall Entrance 1 6/4/2010 t II t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttl tO 4 r 4 r Volume (vph) 316 745 124 38 347 57 149 41 35 73 27 236 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.979 0.979 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.962 0.965 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 4979 0 1770 4979 0 0 1792 1583 0 1798 1583 Flt Permitted 0.291 0.300 0.703 0.684 Satd. Flow (perm) 542 4979 0 559 4979 0 0 1310 1583 0 1274 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 30 29 37 248 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 854 571 1000 53 Travel Time (s) 14.6 9.7 22.7 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 333 784 131 40 365 60 157 43 37 77 28 248 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 333 915 0 40 425 0 0 200 37 0 105 248 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 15.0 4.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.4 9.5 22.4 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 Total Split (s) 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 20.8% 41.7% 0.0% 20.8% 41.7% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% Maximum Green (s) 19.5 43.6 19.5 43.6 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.4 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 6.4 4.0 5.5 6.4 4.0 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 45.9 32.4 24.2 16.1 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.27 0.20 0.13 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:13621ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Synchro\Existing Countryside Mall.syn Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 8: Countryside Blvd & Mall Entrance 1 2010 Existing Traffic 6/4/2010 I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR v/c Ratio 0.74 0.67 0.22 0.61 0.31 0.05 0.16 0.27 Control Delay 58.9 60.1 26.5 49.5 21.0 6.3 19.2 3.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 58.9 60.1 26.5 49.5 21.0 6.3 19.2 3.3 LOS E E C D C A B A Approach Delay 59.8 47.5 18.7 8.0 Approach LOS E D B A Queue Length 50th (ft) 255 260 20 108 87 0 42 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 316 238 37 140 169 21 92 49 Internal Link Dist (ft) 774 491 920 1 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 453 1828 367 1828 654 810 637 915 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.74 0.50 0.11 0.23 0.31 0.05 0.16 0.27 Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 45.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Snlits and Phasas• R Crnrntrvside Blvd & Mall Entrance 1 o2 i(- o3 o4 '!5 .. 25s 50? 0? ' 0 - L 45 s 25 a 50 s . Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:13621ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Synchro\Existing Countryside Mall.syn Page 2 ,4 , ?, -5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2010 Existing Traffic 12: SR 580 & Countryside Blvd 5/27/2010 --* --? -t t- 4--- *-- 4\ t 4/ ,.._ __. ?__ t_ahe__Group _ EBL EBT E B R - ? - WB ....?..L : _ ._-WBT_ WBR _NBL?,, __ NBT _ _ ... R NB _- B-- L S - SB- - T , §B--k Lane Configurations ) tO ) ttl tt r tt r Volume (vph) 132 912 87 276 919 93 63 187 315 99 186 180 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.987 0.986 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5019 0 1770 5014 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.194 0.092 0.629 0.602 Satd. Flow (perm) 361 5019 0 171 5014 0 1172 3539 1583 1121 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 12 332 189 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 35 Link Distance (ft) 1020 1000 751 980 Travel Time (s) 15.5 15.2 17.1 19.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 139 960 92 291 967 98 66 197 332 104 196 189 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 1052 0 291 1065 0 66 197 332 104 196 189 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 12.0 5.0 12.0 5.0 12.0 12.0 5.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.7 23.4 11.7 22.8 11.6 22.3 22.3 11.6 22.3 22.3 Total Split (s) 40.0 60.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 26.7% 40.0% 0.0% 26.7% 40.0% 0.0% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 33.3 53.2 33.3 53.2 18.4 18.7 18.7 18.4 18.7 18.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 4.3 3.6 4.3 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.6 3.6 All-Red Time (s) 3.1 2.5 3.1 2.5 3.6 2.7 2.7 3.6 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.7 6.8 4.0 6.7 6.8 4.0 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 51.9 39.6 69.8 50.7 58.2 49.6 49.6 62.4 51.7 51.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.26 0.47 0.34 0.39 0.33 0.33 0.42 0.34 0.34 Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:12009-00561SynchrolExisting Countryside Mall.syn Page 1 A,L% Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2010 Existing Traffic 12: SR 580 & Countryside Blvd 5/27/2010 ane Group EEL EBT EBR WBL WBT WAR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR v/c Ratio 0.58 0.79 0.88 0.62 0.13 0.17 0.45 0.20 0.16 0.28 Control Delay 33.8 55.1 68.3 42.4 28.1 39.3 6.6 28.3 37.5 6.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.8 55.1 68.3 42.4 28.1 39.3 6.6 28.3 37.5 6.7 LOS C E E D C D A C D A Approach Delay 52.7 47.9 19.8 23.6 Approach LOS D D B C Queue Length 50th (ft) 78 349 227 319 36 71 0 59 69 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 379 310 328 79 124 87 116 120 65 Internal Link Dist (ft) 940 920 671 900 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 479 1788 435 1845 589 1171 746 579 1220 669 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.59 0.67 0.58 0.11 0.17 0.45 0.18 0.16 0.28 trttersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 41.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 12: SR 580 & Countryside Blvd 01 1 02 f- 0, x"04 25 0 25 $ 40 s --- 60 l' ¦ L- - - ?- LAG ?5 ?5 $ 40 s ' 60 s Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:12009-00561SynchrolExisting Countryside Mall.syn Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 Total Traffic 1: Countryside Blvd & Enterprise Road 8/11/2010 --* -,, -- f- a- - 41 * I 4' t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VAT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttT ) ttT 1 T Volume (vph) 41 721 22 20 613 20 54 19 106 15 12 64 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.996 0.995 0.873 0.874 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5065 0 1770 5060 0 1770 1626 0 1770 1628 0 Flt Permitted 0.264 0.195 0.705 0.673 Satd. Flow (perm) 492 5065 0 363 5060 0 1313 1626 0 1254 1628 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 6 40 999 17.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 43 759 23 21 43 No Left 782 0 21 No No No Left Right Left 12 0 16 1.00 15 Perm 4 7 40 840 14.3 0.95 0.95 645 21 666 0 No No Left Right 12 0 16 112 35 996 19.4 0.95 0.95 57 20 0.95 0.95 112 16 57 132 0 16 No No No No Left Left Right Left 12 0 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 15 9 15 9 15 Perm Perm Perm 4 8 2 8 2 6 67 35 993 19.3 0.95 0.95 13 67 80 0 No No Left Right 12 0 16 1.00 1.00 9 6 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 26.2 26.2 26.2 26.2 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 75.0 75.0 0.0 75.0 75.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 62.5% 62.5% 0.0% 62.5% 62.5% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 0.0% 68.8 68.8 68.8 68.8 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 6.2 6.2 4.0 7.5 7.5 4.0 7.5 7.5 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Min Min Min Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.5 26.5 26.5 26.5 79.8 79.8 79.8 79.8 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Countryside Mall T:13621ProjDocslTraffic StudylRevision 081120101Synchro12013 Countryside Mall.syn Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 Total Traffic 1: Countryside Blvd & Enterprise Road 8/1112010 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR v/c Ratio 0.39 0.70 0.26 0.59 0.07 0.12 0.02 0.07 Control Delay 49.6 45.8 58.6 58.0 8.5 2.6 8.4 2.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.6 45.8 58.6 58.0 8.5 2.6 8.4 2.9 LOS D D E E A A A A Approach Delay 46.0 58.0 4.3 3.9 Approach LOS D E A A Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 205 17 197 14 5 4 3 Queue Length 95th (ft) 63 232 m31 241 35 30 14 23 Internal Link Dist (ft) 919 760 916 913 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) 282 2906 208 2904 874 1119 834 1106 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.15 0.27 0.10 0.23 0.07 0.12 0.02 0.07 intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Signal Delay: 44.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 1: Countryside Blvd & Enterprise Road t a2 --l" o4 45 .; 75 s OF, ? Lori 45s 75,s Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:13621ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Revision 081120101Synchro12013 Countryside Mall.syn Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 Total Traffic 5: Countryside Blvd & US 19 Ramps 8/11/2010 --? -,* f- 4-- ,- t -V Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttl )) ttT+ ' t r M t r Volume (vph) 170 440 50 477 521 257 239 143 409 445 77 54 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.985 0.950 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5009 0 3433 4831 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5009 0 3433 4831 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 13 86 431 57 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 840 854 993 995 Travel Time (s) 14.3 14.6 15.0 15.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 179 463 53 502 548 271 252 151 431 468 81 57 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 179 516 0 502 819 0 252 151 431 468 81 57 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 7.0 15.0 7.0 15.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 18.0 26.0 18.0 26.0 18.0 23.6 23.6 18.0 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 50.0 26.0 0.0 50.0 26.0 0.0 18.0 26.0 26.0 18.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 41.7% 21.7% 0.0% 41.7% 21.7% 0.0% 15.0% 21.7% 21.7% 15.0% 21.7% 21.7% Maximum Green (s) 39.0 16.0 39.0 16.0 7.0 18.4 18.4 7.0 18.4 18.4 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.3 4.3 All-Red Time (s) 7.0 6.0 7.0 6.0 7.0 3.3 3.3 7.0 3.3 33 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 11.0 10.0 4.0 11.0 10.0 4.0 11.0 7.6 7.6 11.0 7.6 7.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min C-Min C-Min Min C-Min C-Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 11.6 20.7 23.0 321 17.0 14.9 14.9 21.8 19.7 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.17 0.19 0.27 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.16 0.16 Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:13621ProjDocslTraffic StudylRevision 0811201MSynchro12013 Countryside Mall.syn Page 1 /) -721 67 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 Total Traffic 5: Countryside Blvd & US 19 Ramps 8/11/2010 ---* --0- --,* f- .41 t , Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR v/c Ratio 0.54 0.59 0.76 0.60 0.52 0.65 0.75 0.75 0.26 0.19 Control Delay 72.3 29.7 58.0 47.1 52.9 62.9 13.3 56.0 46.4 12.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 72.3 29.7 58.0 47.1 52.9 62.9 13.3 56.0 46.4 12.9 LOS E C E D D E B E D B Approach Delay 40.7 51.2 34.3 50.7 Approach LOS D D C D Queue Length 50th (ft) 53 151 201 205 94 112 0 174 54 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 71 191 254 231 #155 179 100 #355 105 39 Internal Link Dist (ft) 760 774 913 915 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1116 875 1116 1355 486 286 608 623 313 313 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.16 0.59 0.45 0.60 0.52 0.53 0.71 0.75 0.26 0.18 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:N BT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 44.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Snlits and Phases: 5: Countrvside Blvd & US 19 Ramos 01 t o2 1- 03 --* o4 18S 26s . 50s. 26, 05 06 07 08 18s 26s 50s 26 Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:Q621ProjDocsJraffic StudylRevision 0811201MSynchro12013 Countryside Mall.syn Page 2 A- z / Lanes, Volumes, T imings 2013 Total Traffic 8: Countryside Blvd & Mall Entrance 1 8/11/2010 I Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) tfT ttt 4 r +1 r Volume (vph) 426 745 124 38 347 89 149 46 35 102 31 334 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.979 0.969 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.963 0.963 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 4979 0 1770 4928 0 0 1794 1583 0 1794 1583 Flt Permitted 0.264 0.300 0.687 0.649 Satd. Flow (perm) 492 4979 0 559 4928 0 0 1280 1583 0 1209 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 30 60 37 352 Link Speed (mph) 40 40 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 854 571 1000 53 Travel Time (s) 14.6 9.7 22.7 1.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 448 784 131 40 365 94 157 48 37 107 33 352 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 448 915 0 40 459 0 0 205 37 0 140 352 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 15.0 4.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.4 9.5 22.4 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 Total Split (s) 25.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 20.8% 41.7% 0.0% 20.8% 41.7% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% 37.5% Maximum Green (s) 19.5 43.6 19.5 43.6 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time (s) 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.4 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 5.1 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 6.4 4.0 5.5 6.4 4.0 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 52.7 39.1 24.4 16.3 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.33 0.20 0.14 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:13621ProjDocs\Traffic Study\Revision 081120101Synchro12013 Countryside Mall.syn Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 Total Traffic 8: Countryside Blvd & Mall Entrance 1 8/11/2010 ---? --,* t La &66p "EBL '_EBT EBR -_WBL T WBT WBR _NBL NBT NBR SBL ? SBT SBR v/c Ratio 0.84 0.56 0.22 0.64 0.36 0.05 0.26 0.39 Control Delay 59.9 44.9 24.5 46.5 25.9 7.0 24.2 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.9 44.9 24.5 46.5 25.9 7.0 24.2 3.8 LOS E D C D C A C A Approach Delay 49.8 44.8 23.0 9.6 Approach LOS D D C A Queue Length 50th (ft) 326 212 17 109 104 0 68 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #436 233 36 142 178 21 123 57 Internal Link Dist (ft) 774 491 920 1 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 535 1839 368 1829 568 723 537 898 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.84 0.50 0.11 0.25 0.36 0.05 0.26 0.39 lntersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may b e longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 8: Countrvside Blvd & Mall Entrance 1 I o2 T 03 -11. o4 5 s 4 25s- 50 I o7 08 45 25s 50 s", Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:13621ProjDocslTraffic StudylRevision 081120101Synchro12013 Countryside Mall.syn Page 2 /I - ??/ Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 Total Traffic 12: SR 580 & Count ryside Blvd 8/11/2010 --,, ---t f- *- I- -*\ I * '/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR 1NBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttT ttl+ tt r tt r Volume (vph) 141 924 87 298 933 93 63 187 334 99 196 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.987 0.986 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5019 0 1770 5014 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.200 0.090 0.623 0.601 Satd. Flow (perm) 373 5019 0 168 5014 0 1160 3539 1583 1120 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 12 352 200 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 40 40 Link Distance (ft) 1020 1000 751 980 Travel Time (s) 15.5 15.2 12.8 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 148 973 92 314 982 98 66 197 352 104 206 200 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 148 1065 0 314 1080 0 66 197 352 104 206 200 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 12.0 5.0 12.0 5.0 12.0 12.0 5.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.7 23.4 11.7 22.8 11.6 22.3 22.3 11.6 22.3 22.3 Total Split (s) 40.0 60.0 0.0 40.0 60.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 26.7% 40.0% 0.0% 26.7% 40.0% 0.0% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 33.3 53.2 33.3 53.2 18.4 18.7 18.7 18.4 18.7 18.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.6 4.3 16 4.3 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.6 3.6 All-Red Time (s) 3.1 2.5 3.1 2.5 3.6 2.7 2.7 3.6 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.7 6.8 4.0 6.7 6.8 4.0 6.6 6.3 6.3 6.6 6.3 6.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Min Min Min Min Min C-Min C-Min None C-Min C-Min Walk Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 52.8 40.0 71.9 52.3 56.1 47.5 47.5 60.3 49.5 49.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.27 0.48 0.35 0.37 0.32 0.32 0.40 0.33 0.33 Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:13621ProjDocslTraffic StudylRevision 081120101Synchro12013 Countryside Mall.syn Page 1 " "-7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2013 Total T raffic 12: SR 580 & Countryside Blvd 8/11/2010 Lane Group. EBL EBT EBR UVBC " WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR rSBL... ? _ SBT SBR v/c Ratio 0.59 0.79 0.90 0.61 0.14 0.18 0.48 0.21 0.18 0.30 Control Delay 33.3 55.0 70.5 41.1 29.6 41.1 6.9 29.8 39.3 7.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.3 55.0 70.5 41.1 29.6 41.1 6.9 29.8 39.3 7.0 LOS C E E D C D A C D A Approach Delay 52.4 47.7 20.3 24.7 Approach LOS D D C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 81 354 250 318 38 73 0 60 74 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 102 383 335 328 82 127 93 119 129 68 Internal Link Dist (ft) 940 920 671 900 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) 486 1787 436 1870 569 1120 741 563 1169 657 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.60 0.72 0.58 0.12 0.18 0.48 0.18 0.18 0.30 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 150 Actuated Cycle Length: 150 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:N BTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay. 41.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases- 12 SR 580 & Countrvside Blvd 01 1 o2 7 c+3 o4 25 .: 25s - 40 s 60's .l 05 1 06 07 '- 03 25 s 25:s 1111111111 40s- 60S , Countryside Mall Synchro 7 - Report T:13621ProjDocslTraffic StudylRevision 081120101Synchro12013 Countryside Mall.syn Page 2 Zq - _??; 4 a I A 8 F L C (-E C R- t-o. MAX C P- P E A S V ct'c TABLE 4 Generalized Peak Hour Two-Way Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas' 9/4/09 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes 4 B 000 4 C 5 500 D 6,770 E 7,300 Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided 930 1,500 1,600 *** 6 , 6,000 , 8,320 10,150 11,290 4 Divided 2,840 3,440 3,560 *** 8 8,000 11,050 13,480 15,270 6 Divided 4,370 5,200 5,360 *** 10 10,000 13,960 16,930 19,250 8 Divided 5,900 6,970 7,160 *** 12 13,730 18,600 21,950 23,230 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided ** 1,020 1,480 1,570 4 Divided 6 Divided ** * * 2,420 3,790 3 220 (ilk) 3,400 5,150 8 Divided ** 5,150 6,530 6,880 d,-w,tY MA- = 4960,\ 95-:4636--?5-4 b72,o7o Class III/IV (more than 4.50 signalized intersectiots per mile) Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided ** 500 1,150 1,440 4 Divided ** 1,220 2,730 3,100 6 Divided ** 1,910 4,240 4,680 8 Divided ** 2,620 5,770 6,280 Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Major City/County Roadways -10% Other Signalized Roadways - 35% State & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Divided/Undivided & Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median LeftLanes Right Lanes Factors 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided No No -20% Multi Undivided Yes No -5% Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes + 15% One-Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding two-directional volumes in this table by 0.6. Freeway Adjustments Auxiliary Ramp Oversaturated Lanes Metering Conditions* +1,800 +5% -10%ofE -ar-AL- M4-V Vr?f_f7noc UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS Lanes Median B C D E 2 Undivided 730 1,460 2,080 2,620 4 Divided 3,220 4,660 6,040 6,840 6 Divided 4,840 6,990 9,060 10,280 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% BICYCLE MODE' (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** 310 1,180 >1,180 50-84% 240 360 >360 *** 85-100% 620 >620 *** *** PEDESTRIAN MODE' (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** ** 480 1,390 50-84% ** ** 1,100 1,820 85-100% ** 1,100 1,820 >1,820 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 >1 r Values shown are presented as hourly two-way volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Although presented as peak hour two- way volumes, they actually represent peak hour peak direction conditions with an applicable D factor applied. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. a Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 3 Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of the higher traffic flow. * For oversaturated conditions during peak hour, subtract 10% from the LOS E (capacity volumes). This number becomes the new maximum service volume for LOS D, and LOS E cannot be achieved. Source: Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. Florida Department of Transportation *** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D Systems Planning Office become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 F) is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 N"v%v.dot.state.fl.us/i)lannin0systems/sm/los/default.shtin 2009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK 4-3 ti 4l A • N n Cfl? ?.YsIa ?Lv? Mhx. COs D VOLVAg6 TABLE 7 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas' 9/4/09 STATE SIGNALIZED ARTERIALS FREEWAYS Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) Lanes 2 B 2 200 C 020 3 D E 020 720 4 3 Lanes 1 Median B Undivided 510 C 820 D 880 E *** 3 , 3,300 , 4,580 , , 5,580 6,200 2 Divided 1,560 1,890 1,960 *** 4 4,400 6,080 7,420 8,400 3 Divided 2,400 2,860 2,940 *** 5 5,500 7,680 9,320 10,580 4 Divided 3,240 3,830 3,940 *** 6 7,560 10,220 1 2,080 12,780 Freeway Adjustments Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signal ized intersections per mile) Auxiliary Ramp Oversaturated Lanes Median B C D E Lanes Metering Conditions* I Undivided ** 560 810 860 +1,000 +5% -10% of E ** 330 1 1 77 0 1 870 2 Divided , . , 3 Divided 0 2 680 2,830 UNINTERRU PTED FLOW HIGHWAYS 4 Divided ** 2,830 3,590 3,780 6,619 x a 9 S- 544 / d Lanes Median B C D E Cl ass HUIV (more than 4.50 si / gnalized intersections per mile) I Undivided 400 800 1,140 1,440 Lanes Median B C D E 2 Divided 1,770 2,560 3,320 3,760 1 Undivided ** 270 630 790 3 Divided 2,660 3,840 4,980 5,650 2 Divided ** 670 1,500 1,700 Uninterrupted Flow Highway Adjustments 3 Divided ** 1,050 2,330 2,570 Lanes Median Exclusive left lanes Adjustment factors 4 Divided ** 1,440 3,170 3,450 2 Divided Yes +5% Multi Undivided Yes -5% Multi Undivided No -25% Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Major City/County Roadways -10% Other Signalized Roadways - 35% State & Non-State Signalized Roadway Adjustments (Alter corresponding state volumes by the indicated percent.) Divided/Undivided & Turn Lane Adjustments Exclusive Exclusive Adjustment Lanes Median Left Lanes Right Lanes Factors 2 Divided Yes No +5% 2 Undivided No No -20% Multi Undivided Yes No -5% Multi Undivided No No -25% Yes +15% BICYCLE MODE' (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Paved Shoulder/ Bicycle Lane Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** 170 650 >650 50-84% 130 200 >200 *** 85-100% 340 >340 *** *** PEDESTRIAN MODE' (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to determine two-way maximum service volumes.) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-49% ** ** 270 770 50-84% ** 100 600 1000 85-100% ** 610 1000 >1000 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route)3 (Buses in peak hour in peak direction) Sidewalk Coverage B C D E 0-84% >5 >4 >3 >2 85-100% >4 >3 >2 >1 One-Way Facility Adjustment Multiply the corresponding volumes in this table by 1.20. Values shown are presented as hourly directional volumes for levels of service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. To convert to annual average daily traffic volumes, these volumes must be divided by appropriate D and K factors. This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer models from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications. The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or intersection design, where more refined techniques exist. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual, Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the automobile/truck, bicycle, pedestrian and bus modes. 2 Level of service for the bicycle and pedestrian modes in this table is based on number of motorized vehicles, not number of bicyclists or pedestrians using the facility. 'Buses per hour shown are only for the peak hour in the single direction of the higher haffic flow. * For oversaturated conditions during peak hour, subtract 10% from the LOS E (capacity volumes). $Ot[rCe: This number becomes the new maximum service volume for LOS D, and LOS E cannot be achieved. •' Cannot be achieved using table input value defaults. Florida Department of Transportation Systems Planning Office *** Not applicable for that level of service letter grade. For the automobile mode, volumes greater than level of service D 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For the bicycle mode, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable because there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 www. dot. state. fl. us/plann in0systems/snt/los/de fault.shtm 2009 FDOT QUALITY/LEVEL OF SERVICE HANDBOOK #, 5 S Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets I CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Bellwether Properties of Florida, Ltd., c/o Rebecca Gagalis, Development Director 2730 University Boulevard, Suite 900, Wheaton, MD 20902 240-669-0334 301-535-2169 See Exhibit A FAX NUMBER: 301-946-1460 EMAIL: rgagalis@westfield.com Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., President, Florida Design Consultants, Inc., 3030 Starkey Boulevard, New Port Richey, FL 34655 I Scott I Steady. Williams, Schifno, Maqione & Steady, P.A., P.O. Box 380, Tampa, FL 336601-0580 727-849-7588/813-221-2626 727-271-9001 FAX NUMBER: 727-848-3648/813-221.7335 EMAIL: emazur@fldesign.com/ssteady@wsmslaw.com 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. See Exhibit B OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. See Exhibit B C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDeskloplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc Page 1 of 2 :es - kACountryside Mall\Permits\comprehensive_landscape_program_application.pdf 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. See Exhibit B 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Exhibit B 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. See Exhibit B THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my se tatives to visit and knowledge and au • e City re 12 photograph the pr er \ d tribe n thiVapplication. Signature CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ) ss. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of ,A.D. 20 tome and/or by who is personally known has produced as identification. Notary public, My commission expires: On June 29, 2010, before me, Annie M. Zettel, a Notary Public personally appeared Rory A. Packer who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that t p??!r it ann rer ?rl. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ANNIE M. ZETTEI Commission # 1794435 ((( Signature (Seal) is Notory Public • California = Los Angeles Counly tM Comm, 6 Tres r 21 2012 r C:IDocuments and Settingsiderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 2 :es - k:\Countryside Mall\Permits\comprehensive_landscape program_application.pdf Exhibit A BELLWETHER PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA (LIMITED), a Florida limited partnership By: WEA Countryside GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its general partner By: Westfield America Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, its sole member By: Westfield U.S. HolqjagiE, C, a Del are limited liability company, its gen a?i /7 By: N Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ) ss. On June 30, 2010, before me, Annie M. Zettel, a Notary Public personally appeared Rory A. Packer who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. ANNIE WITNESS my hand and official seal. Commission ^ # 1794435 Notary Public - California Signature m• (Seal) Los Angeles County ? Comm. 21.2012 EXHIBIT B WESTFIELD COUNTRYSIDE MALL Comprehensive Landscape Program Application Introduction Countryside Mall is the only regional mall located within the City of Clearwater as well as the only regional mall located in North Pinellas County. Westfield now proposes to dramatically improve this regional mall by adding additional shopping opportunities, a state-of-the-art movie theater complex, and restaurants (Site plan improvements and mall addition are described in the companion flexible development application for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project submitted simultaneously with this application.) With this proposed mall addition, Countryside Mall will have the only first-run movie theater in the City of Clearwater. The proposed expansion will expand the mall's function as the premier shopping and entertainment destination for North Pinellas County. Countryside Mall was constructed in the 1970s approximately 40 years ago when the Countryside area was master planned and developed by U.S. Home. Countryside Mall is bounded by three major streets and residential development on its fourth property border. Therefore, the locational characteristics of the mall prevent any expansion outside of the existing mall property and redevelopment can only occur within the current property boundaries. Redevelopment within the current boundaries present challenges, given the mall was not designed to accommodate the high level of perimeter and internal parking lot landscaping that is commonly found today, that the City of Clearwater now requires for commercial projects. Although this project is not of a value that would trigger compliance with the City's landscape code, the addition of landscaping materials and trees in selected visible areas will make a positive improvement in the mall's presentation to its customers. Specifically, this application requests flexibility in one area only: the foundation landscaping for the new addition. Additionally, this application proposes enhanced landscaping on Countryside Boulevard, at each driveway and at the base of all freestanding signs. There are three major components of this Comprehensive Landscape Program and each is described in detail below. Enhanced Perimeter Landscaping on Countryside Boulevard As a very visible roadway adjacent to the project, Countryside Boulevard is proposed to receive new landscape material and trees to enhance its aesthetic appeal for customers and the driving public. The landscape material and trees is in addition to that proposed for the landscape islands within the renovated parking areas. Details of the proposed plantings and trees are shown in the attached Landscape Plans. A second row of shrub materials has been added to the Countryside Boulevard perimeter, as well as trees. Additionally, extensive new landscaping is proposed for the corner of Countryside Boulevard and U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road due to the visibility of that intersection. Page 1 of 4 July 2, 2010 255206v2 Enhanced Landscaping at each driveway and at the base of all freestanding signs This application also proposes new landscaping at each full access driveway to the project including four driveways on Countryside Boulevard and three driveways on SR 580. Of these seven driveways, four of them also have a monument sign located within the driveway area and enhanced landscaping is proposed at the base of each monument sign. Further, this application proposes enhanced landscaping at the base of the existing pylon sign on the U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road and at the base of the new pylon sign at the corner of U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road and Countryside Boulevard. Flexibili regarding the foundation landscaping for the mall addition The City code requires foundation landscaping for the new mall addition for any facade that faces a street. In the case of the addition, the new foundation landscaping would apply to the west and south sides of the building (the east facade faces internally to the mall building). This application requests a waiver of that requirement for the foundation planting for the west facade since that portion of the building is the service and mechanical area; foundation landscaping would create conflicts with the service function of this part of the building. The west facade of the theater addition is located approximately 609 feet from U.S. Highway 19 Frontage Road and this distance and the intervening parking lot will reduce the visual impact of this area. As a supplement for the lack of foundation landscaping, this program proposes to plant additional trees in a buffer area immediately west of the west facade of the theater. The purpose of this planting area is to create a buffer of the west facade of the building, although not located immediately adjacent to the building. With regard to the south elevation, this application requests an alternative to the typical foundation landscaping immediately adjacent to the building due to the proposed outdoor plaza area to be located between the addition and the parking area. The applicant proposes that landscaping be provided in a planting area along the southern edge of this plaza next to the parking lot area. The planting area will allow for pedestrian access from the parking lot and will be five feet wide which is the width requirement for foundation landscaping. This planting area of five feet in width is also proposed in the same location in the outdoor plaza on the east side of the addition. Although foundation landscaping is not required at all on the east facade, this additional planting area is proposed for consistency of design for both outdoor plazas and as an alternative to the required foundation landscaping. With this alternative, the landscaping design will create a pleasing atmosphere for the outdoor dining area as well as serve as a physical separator between the outdoor plaza and the parking area. The specific location and planting material for the outdoor plaza on the south and east sides of the addition is shown on the attached landscape plans. Page 2 of 4 July 2, 2010 255206v2 Flexibility Criteria 1) Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. Countryside Mall was constructed approximately 40 years ago, prior to the adoption of the City's current code and before commercial landscaping was the standard development practice. One of the most critical aspects of a successful mall is the availability of free convenient parking for customers; therefore, to reduce any of the existing parking would be highly detrimental to the continued success of the mall. To improve the site's coverall aesthetic appeal, this application proposes to enhance the Countryside Boulevard perimeter landscaping, the landscaping adjacent to each major driveway and the landscaping at the base of all freestanding signs. This alternative allows the parking ratio for the mall, with the addition, to continue to be 4.4 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet, which is the currently available parking and was approved by the City in 1999 with the department store expansion. The planters located in the outdoor dining area/plaza, an alternative to foundation landscaping, are a critical component in creating an inviting outdoor space for customers of both the theater and restaurants. The proposed alternative of planters areas will assist in creating the outdoor plaza as an "outdoor room" to complement the new entertainment center. The planters also serve the important safety function of separating pedestrians in the outdoor plaza from vehicles in the parking lot. The location of the planters may be relocated in the future to accommodate the needs of the tenants or a change of the tenant mix. Page 3 of 4 July 2, 2010 255206v2 2) Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Countryside Mall is the center of an Activity Center and is an intense commercial node serving all of North Pinellas County. The improvements to Countryside Boulevard and to the SR 580 entrances will enhance the commercial neighborhood in which the mall is located. When the enhanced landscaping is combined with the appealing mall addition and the energizing new sign program, the mall improvements will increase the visual appeal of the property and contribute positively to the Countryside commercial area and to the City overall. 3) Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The improvements to Countryside Mall including the mall addition, the enhanced landscaping and the new signage will all contribute to a beneficial impact on properties located in the vicinity of the mall. The new trees and landscape materials on Countryside Boulevard will refresh the existing mall site and create a visually interesting "front-door" to the mall property. 4) Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. This site is not located within a Special Area or Scenic Corridor so there are no applicable guidelines for this project. Page 4 of 4 July 2, 2010 255206v2