Loading...
FLD2010-06002; 2120 RANGE RD; ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT INCFLD2010-06002 212 0 RANGE RD Date Received: 6/1/2010 11:50:56 AM Alternative Treatment Inc. ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 271B PLANNER OF RECORD: S -K PLANNER: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner: Applicant: Address: August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 D. 3. Range Road, LLC. Alternative Treatment International, Inc. 2120 Range Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development application to permit a social/public service agency in the Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District with a lot area of 50,741 square feet, a lot width of 162 feet, a front (south) setback of 118.6 feet (to existing building), 15 feet (to existing pavement), a side (east) setback of 46.65 feet (to existing building), 10 feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of 14.7 feet (to existing building), eight feet (to existing pavement), a rear (north) setback of 61.35 feet (to existing building), 13.25 feet (to existing pavement), a building height of 25 feet (to existing midpoint of the pitched roof) and 39 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-1304.C, with a reduction to the shrub requirement to the north perimeter landscape buffer, a reduction to the interior landscape island width from eight feet to four feet and a reduction to the interior landscape size from 150 square feet to 68 square feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3- 1202.G. CURRENT ZONING: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District CURRENT LAND USE PLAN CATEGORY: Industrial Limited (IL) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Office Proposed Use: Social/Public Service Agency EXISTING North: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District SURROUNDING Wholesale/Distribution/Warehouse Facility ZONING AND USES: South: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District Manufacturing and Office East: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District Manufacturing West: Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District Manufacturing Community Development Board - August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 -Page 1 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.16 acre subject property is located on the north side of Range Road approximately 850 feet west of the intersection of Belcher Road and Range Road. Belcher Road serves as a major north- south arterial and is lined with office and industrial development. Range Road runs east-west and is located between Hercules Avenue and Belcher Road. The immediate area includes Manufacturing and Distribution to the north and a plastic manufacturer to the east. To the west, is Monin, a manufacturer of plumbing products and an industrial office is located to the south. The site is currently developed with a two-story, 14,830 square foot building. The building is currently used for administrative offices and no changes to the building are proposed. The brick building is maintained well, provides changes in horizontal building planes, has architectural details such as columns and stringcourses and has a distinctive roof form. Development Proposal: On June 1, 2010, a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application was submitted for the subject property. The application proposes to establish a social/public service agency (counseling center) use within the existing 14,830 square foot office building. The Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District only provides for this proposed use through the Flexible Development approval process. The proposed social/public service agency is Alternative Treatment International, Inc. which provides individualized services and a safe, therapeutic environment for those who suffer from the effects of depression, trauma, substance abuse and other emotional and spiritual disorders. The majority of the clients reside off-site at residential quarters and the clients are transported to the site by a van daily between the hours of Sam - 5pm to participate in various counseling sessions, therapy sessions, attend presentations by guest speakers and receive treatments. The facility also proposes on-site overnight stays for no more than 10 clients desiring more intensive counseling and therapy treatments. The existing office building and associated off-street parking area will remain unchanged with the exception of the restriping of some parking spaces, installing a handicap accessible walkway on the west side of the property and ADA ramp modifications. This walkway is exempt from compliance with minimum setbacks and will have a de minimis impact upon the maximum impervious surface ratio. As there will be no building additions or modifications to the existing site improvements, there will be no impact upon the F.A.R., I.S.R., minimum lot area/size, maximum building height and/or minimum setback development standards with this proposal. The development proposal's compliance with the applicable development standards of the Community Development Code (CDC) is discussed below. Intensity: Pursuant to the Countywide Plan Rules and CDC Section 2-1301.1, the maximum allowable intensity is a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.65. The proposal is in compliance with the above as it has a FAR of 0.29. Community Development Board - August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 - Page 2 Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1301.1, the maximum allowable ISR is 0.85. The overall proposed ISR is 0.69, which is consistent with the above. Minimum Lot Area and Width: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1304, the minimum lot area for social/public service agencies is 10,000 square feet. The overall site is 50,741 square feet of lot area. Pursuant to the same Section, the minimum lot width is 100 feet. The width of the lot along Range Road is 162 feet. The proposal is consistent with these Code provisions. Minimum Setbacks: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1304, the minimum front setback for social/public service agencies is 20 feet, the side and rear setback is 15 feet. The front (south) setback is 118.6 feet (to existing building), 15 feet (to existing pavement), a side (east) setback of 46.65 feet (to existing building), 10 feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of 14.7 feet (to existing building), eight feet (to existing pavement), a rear (north) setback of 61.35 feet (to existing building), and 13.25 feet (to existing pavement). While all the existing setbacks do not meet the criteria of CDC Section 2-1304; they are consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment provisions. As mentioned previously there will be no building additions or modifications to the existing site improvements. Maximum Building Height: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1304, the maximum building height for social/public service agencies is 30 feet. The height of the existing building is 25 feet (to midpoint of the pitched roof). The proposal is consistent with this Code provision. Minimum Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to CDC Section 2-1304, the minimum off-street parking requirement for both the existing office use and the proposed social/public service agency use is three parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. As such, 44 parking spaces are required. The site currently has 38 parking spaces; however by re-striping the parking lot the property will gain an additional space resulting in a total of 39 parking spaces. The applicant has provided a parking demand study showing the greatest demand for parking spaces occurring in morning and requiring 25 parking spaces. As stated previously most clients are shuttled to the center each day at Sam by way of a courtesy van and at 5pm they are shuttled to off-site guest quarters. Additionally, there are approximately 20 staff members who cover three shifts with the average number of staff members during shift being six. Further, the subject sites location between Hercules Avenue and Belcher Road provide additional options as both corridors are located on PSTA bus routes and may provide transportation options to both employees and clients. Staff has found this parking demand study acceptable. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility Criteria set forth in CDC Section 2-1304.H: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is X designated as residential in the zoning atlas. 2. The social/public service agency shall not be located within 1,500 feet of another X social/public service agency. Community Development Board - August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 - Page 3 With regard to the above criteria, the subject property is adjacent to IRT zoning on all four common property boundaries. Additionally, the applicant has submitted and aerial map that depicts no other social/public service agencies being located within 1,500 feet of the subject property. As such, the proposal has been found to be in compliance with the above criteria. Sight Visibility Triangles: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-904.A, to minimize hazards at the driveways, no structures or landscaping may be installed which will obstruct views at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade within 20-foot sight visibility triangle. No structures or landscaping is proposed within the site triangle. Solid Waste: The proposal will utilize a new 10-foot by 12-foot dumpster with an enclosure that will be located at the rear of the property. The proposal has been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Landscaping: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.D.1, this site is required a 15-foot wide landscape buffer along Range Road and a five-foot wide landscape buffer is required along the rear and both side property lines. The subject property has an existing 15-foot wide landscape buffer along Range Road planted with four large laurel oaks and an existing hedge. While there are additional areas within this existing buffer for additional plant material the Land Resource Specialist has determined that disturbing the soil within the root zone of the trees would be detrimental to the oak trees; therefore no additional plants are proposed in this area. Likewise the rear landscape buffer exists with three large laurel oaks and two pine trees. There are no shrubs located in the existing rear landscape buffer; however there is an existing six-foot PVC fence and the existing roots prevent additional plantings as was the case in the front buffer. Both side landscape buffers are planted with an adequate amount trees and shrubs. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.2, foundation plantings shall be provided for 100 percent of a building facade with frontage along a street right-of-way. The foundation plantings must be within an area that is a minimum of five feet wide and consist of at least two accent trees or three palm trees for every 40 linear feet of building facade and one shrub for every 20 square feet of required landscape area. A minimum of 50 percent of the area shall contain shrubs with the remainder to be ground cover. The Range Road building facade has existing landscaping in excess of this requirement. Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.E.1, ten percent of the gross vehicular use area must be provided as landscape islands a minimum of 150 square feet in size. While the site has 10.1 percent of the vehicular use area devoted to interior landscape islands, some of the islands are not eight feet wide or the minimum 150 square feet. However, there is no opportunity to increase the size of the existing islands. To mitigate for the inadequate size of the interior islands and the absence of shrubs in the rear landscape buffer the applicant has proposed additional shrubs and groundcover where appropriate in both side landscape buffers. Comprehensive Landscape Program: Pursuant to CDC Section 3-1202.G, the landscaping requirements contained within the Code can be waived or modified if the application contains a Comprehensive Landscape Program satisfying certain criteria. The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with those criteria: Community Development Board -August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 - Page 4 I . Architectural theme: Consistent I Inconsistent a. The landscaping in a comprehensive landscape program shall be designed as a N/A part of the architectural theme of the principle buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for development; or b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment X proposed in the comprehensive landscape program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. 2. Lighting: Any lighting proposed as a part of a comprehensive landscape program is N/A automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. 3. Community character: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive X landscape program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. 4. Property values: The landscape treatment proposed in the comprehensive landscape X program will have a beneficial impact on the value of property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. Special area or scenic corridor plan: The landscape treatment proposed in the N/A comprehensive landscape program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the standards and criteria as per CDC Sections 2-1301.1 and 2-1304: Standard Existing / Proposed Consistent Inconsistent F.A.R. 0.65 0.29 X' I.S.R. 0.85 0.69 X' Minimum Lot Area 20,000 square feet 50,741 square feet X' Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 162 feet X' Maximum Building Height 30 feet 25 feet X' Minimum Setbacks Front: 20 feet South: 118.5 feet (to building) X1 15 feet (to pavement) Side 15 feet East: 46.65 feet (to building) X1 10 feet (to pavement) West: 14.7 feet (to building) X' 8 feet (to pavement) Rear: 15 feet North: 61.35 feet (to building) X' 13.5 feet (to pavement) Minimum Off-Street Parking 3 spaces/1,000 sf GFA 39 parking spaces X 44 arkin s aces) I Figures reflect existing conditions on site that are not being altered or approved by the proposed application. Community Development Board - August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 - Page 5 COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2- 1304.C. (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from X the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of X the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly X development and improvement of surrounding properties. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed X development. 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use x category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; ? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and annronriate distances between buildines. Community Development Board -August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 - Page 6 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS FOR LEVEL TWO APPROVALS: The following table depicts the consistency of the development proposal with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including x visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials at its meeting of July 1, 2010, and deemed the development proposal to be legally sufficient to move forward to the Community Development Board (CDB), based upon the following: Findings of Fact. The Planning and Development Department, having reviewed all evidence submitted by the applicant and requirements of the Community Development Code, finds that there is substantial competent evidence to support the following findings of fact: 1. That the 1.16 acre subject property is located on the north side of Range Road approximately 850 feet west of the intersection of Belcher Road and Range Road; 2. That the subject property is located within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) District and the Industrial Limited (IL) Land Use Plan category; 3. That the proposal consists only of a change of use from office to social/public service agencies within an existing office building; 4. That a parking demand study has been provided by the applicant that states the highest demand for parking for this use is 25 spaces; 5. That the proposal includes 39 parking spaces; and 6. That the proposal has no impact upon the following development standards: F.A.R., I.S.R., minimum lot area/size, setbacks and maximum building height, as they presently exist; Conclusions of Law. The Planning and Development Department, having made the above findings of fact, reaches the following conclusions of law: 1. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the applicable Standards and Criteria as per CDC Sections 2-1301.1 and 2-1304; 2. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexibility criteria as per CDC Section 2-1304.C; 3. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the Flexibility criteria for a Social/Public Service Agency as per CDC Section 2-1304.11; Community Development Board -August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 - Page 7 4. That the development proposal has been found to be in compliance with the General Standards for Level Two Approvals as per CDC Section 3-914.A; and 5. The development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Landscape Program criteria as per CDC Section 3-1202.G. Based upon the above, the Planning and Development Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit a social/public service agency in the Industrial Research and Technology (IRT) District with a lot area of 50,741 square feet, a lot width of 162 feet, a front (south) setback of 118.6 feet (to existing building), 15 feet (to existing pavement), a side (east) setback of 46.65 feet (to existing building), 10 feet (to existing pavement), a side (west) setback of 14.7 feet (to existing building), eight feet (to existing pavement), a rear (north) setback of 61.35 feet (to existing building), 13.25 feet (to existing pavement), a building height of 25 feet (to existing midpoint of the pitched roof) and 39 parking spaces, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Community Development Code (CDC) Section 2-1304.C, with a reduction to the shrub requirement to the north perimeter landscape buffer, a reduction to the interior landscape island width from eight feet to four feet and a reduction to the interior landscape size from 150 square feet to 68 square feet, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G, subject to the following conditions: Condition of Approval: 1. That, prior to the issuance of a Business Tax Receipt, the handicap accessible walk, restriping and ADA ramp modifications be installed; 2. That, prior to the issuance of a certificate of completion or business tax receipt, whichever occurs first, all of the proposed landscaping shall be installed; and 3. That a building permit be obtained for the handicap access improvements. Prepared by Planning and Development Department Staff: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map; Aerial Map; Zoning Map; Existing Surrounding Uses Map; and Photographs of Site and Vicinity Community Development Board - August 17, 2010 FLD2010-06002 - Page 8 Resume A. Scott Kurleman 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 727-562-4553 scott.kurleman(k)mvelearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III • Planner II August 2008 to present June 2005 to August 2008 Regulate growth and development of the City in accordance with land resource ordinances and regulations related to community development. Landscape plan review including: conceptual, variance, and conditional use. Reviews and analyzes site plans and conducts field studies to determine the integrity of development plans and their compatibility with surroundings. Interdepartmental and zoning assistance. Respond as a City representative to citizens, City officials, and businesses concerning ordinances and regulations. Make recommendations and presentations at staff level at various review committees, boards, and meetings. • Land Resource Specialist City of Clearwater June 1996 to June 2005 Coordinates with City Legal Department to initiate legal proceedings for non-compliance with City land resource regulations. Landscape re-inspection program. Plans and directs program to ensure that plant material installed per the approved landscape plan remains in a healthy growing condition in perpetuity and restores deficient landscaped with new plant material. Certificate of Occupancy Inspection. Perform inspections with contractors, owners, and City departments to monitor the installation of required landscape material per an approved site plan. Process tree permits ensuring that regulations governing the removal criteria are followed. Provide technical tree evaluations for structural defects, hazards, proper pruning, and identification for trees on public and private properties. • Account Manager Cherry Lake Farms, IMG Enterprise, Inc. 1993 - 1996 Groveland, FL Supervised and managed existing territory accounts, while handling a strategic marketing plan. Planned and directed in-field inspection program for landscape architects, municipalities and private corporations. Prepared technical training modules for corporate employees and customers regarding arboricultural techniques related to trees. • Licensed Marketing Representative Allstate Insurance Company 1991-1993 Clearwater, FL Field inspections of insured structures. Policy service and account maintenance. • Store Manager William Natorp company, Inc. 1983-1991 Cincinnati, OH Managed a team of 20 sales people and sales associates in a landscape center. Responsible for teams of employees including but not limited to payroll, budgeting, sales, store and equipment maintenance, workplace safety, and advertising. Managed outdoor staff, merchandised and cared for all outdoor products. Responsible for all indoor staff and horticultural products. EDUCATION GRADUATE - Certificate: Community Development, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA, TAMPA, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BS in Sustainability Management, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Currently pursuing. BA in Business Administration, ST. LEO UNIVERSITY, ST. LEO, FLORIDA. Graduated July, 2002 Cum Laude. Major: Management AA in Business Administration, ST. PETERSBURG COLLEGE, FLORIDA. Graduated 1998. Major: Management. AS in Ornamental Horticulture, OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, WOOSTER, Graduated 1984 Cum Laude. Major: Horticulture Technology with emphasis in Arboriculture. ISA, International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, FL-0414. 1600 1555 •. , . IR7?5 z z 1498 .... ??. o • _ ., . .•. .? o N N N ?•• •? N N N .... ? IR T RANGE RD ` N.. N N N N O a Q Y 1231 _ .. N . =1195: ,ti :7 7 Zoning Map Owner: Range Road, LLC Case: FLD2010-06002 Site: 2120 Range Road Property Size: 1.16 Acres PIN: 12-29-15-70182-100-1301 Atlas Page: 271 B - - VAIIIDELT DR 5'vo z 4 ^ Y 'mil ?i l±r?s v$?"B -F *w. +?,. ?YL`ai ' t"^ f ! R ?` x ? Y dd s?# . 'hFarr,,,ua t--».....??.^?'.3 ^?•d.` ?''?'r ` : mow ? a = ' PROJECT SITE,. WE -j1AEA,'v;:R PARK , k' " ,e . ®... ? •^ Lc'3;:, 1!?d3}' R ? } Hd rAa •ti, t _ c v ?; Location Map Owner: Range Road, LLC Case: FLD2010-06002 Site: 2120 Range Road Property Size: 1.16 Acres PIN: 12-29-15-70182-100-1301 Atlas Page: 271 B 1800 1555 - - _ -- - ° 1575 a ` 1498 . . n? _ f ?.? MANUFACTURI G & OFFICE MANUFACTURING .. , .vi o 0 N N N a. mt t . RANGE RD .1 N N h N N h N MANUFACT URING & OFFI CE a Q 1231 • =1195: M M Existing Surrounding Uses Map owner: Range Road, LLC Case: FLD2010-06002 Site: 2120 Range Road Property Size: 1.16 Acres PIN: 12-29-15-70182-100-1301 Atlas Page: 271 B ow%i t d* #' 4: .Y i ' .. 'si t w 711 Owner: Range Road, LLC Case: FLU2U i U-U6UU2 Site: 2120 Range Road Property Size: 1.16 Acres PIN: 12-29-15-70182-100-1301 Atlas Page: 271 B Covered entryway at the subject property Covered parking on the east side of subject building Subject property looking south 2120 Range Road FLD2010-06002 Page 1 of 1 Subject property looking north East side of subject building Front parking lot of subject property Northside '6019&wr&!? sM&W, lope, July 7, 2010 Mr. Scott Kurleman Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2010-06002 2120 Range Road Response to DRC Comments/Conditions NES# 1010 Dear Mr. Kurleman: CIVIL LAsNK) P'LAIdNINC, IcNVIl40IdMEN`I'AL The following information is provided in response the undated DRC Comments received via e-mail on July 2, 2010. Engineering Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: Review 1. Dumpster enclosure shall comply with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #701, pages 1/3 and 3/3. Index shall be included with the plans. NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 which indicates the enclosure and C1.3 for the Dumpster Enclosure detail #701, pgs 1/3 and 3/3. 2. Provide solid waste vehicle turning diagram showing how a vehicle with an outside turning radius of 30-feet will be able to access dumpster and leave site. NOTE: IF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE IS AN EXISTING, PERMITTED STRUCTURE, THEN PRECEEDING COMMENTS DO NOT APPLY. NES Response: Mr. Tom Glenn conducted a site visit and determined the appropriate location for the dumpster; he is satisfied with the accessibility and location of the dumpster. Mr. Glenn provided his comments/review to Mr. Kurleman in a e-mail dated 07/08/10. 3. Please provide explanation as to why a backflow prevention device is being added on sheet C2.1. NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1; the note associated with the backflow preventor has been removed. The General Notes listed below are also hereby acknowledged. General Note: All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each department condition has been met. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site- specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Traffic Eng The following items shall be addressed prior to CDB: Review 1. Provide an accessible route from a building's accessible entrance to a public sidewalk compliant with Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Chapter 11 Section 11-4.3.2. NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 for a new sidewalk connection to the public sidewalk adjacent to Range Road. 2. There shall be no objects in the sight triangle which does not meet the City's acceptable vertical height criteria at a level between 30 inches above grade and eight feet above grade. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). NES Response: Please see note added to plans stating "Project Arborist to appropriately limb up the tree to insure the 8' clear height is achieved." The small existing free standing sign within the sight triangle is currently under consideration by the Planning and Engineering Dept. If additional actions are determined necessary by the City to address the existing sign, the Applicant respectfully requests the ability to move forward with this application with the understanding that the actions required to address the sign must be taken prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Provide directional pavement arrows at the 18' wide covered one-way driveway for better internal circulation. NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 for requested directional pavement arrows. 4. Provide detectable curb ramp surface (truncated domes) at all existing point of access and where accessible route enters a travel way. (Use FDOT detail http://www.dot.state.fl.u,,3/rddesiqn/rd/RTDS/08/304.pd f) NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 for the curb ramps; detail FDOT Index #304 6/6 has also been provided within the revised plan set. 5. The dimension for drive aisle width at the North lot does not measure 24' as shown on the site plan, please correct. NES Response: Striping has been removed, driveway dimensions corrected and measures at 24'; please see revised Civil plans. General Note(s): 1) Applicant shall comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule and paid prior to a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.). 2) DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Fire Review Sheet C2.1 shows the fire hydrant in the north east drive, to use this fire hydrant you will need to provide a turn around to meet the requirements of NFPA-101, 2006 edition Chapter 18. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1; Hydrant will be relocated to the south as per discussion at DRC; per Terry Labelle the existing line will be abandoned and filled with grout. Fire Review A fire sprinkler system in accordance with 2002 NFPA 13 is required. PRIOR TO CDB Architect Response: A note has been added to sheet A-3.1 to comply with 2002 NFPA 13 Fire Review FDC is required, and shall be a minimum of 15' from building and shall have a fire hydrant within 25-50. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 providing the FDC a minimum of 15' from the building and a relocated hydrant within 50' of the FDC. Fire Review Plan shows a Kitchen/Break Room, what type of cooking equipment will be in this area. If commercial cooking you will need to meet the requirements of NFPA-96,2004 edition and NFPA-17A,2002 edition. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB Architect Response: A note has been added to sheet A-3.1 that no commercial cooking to be provided. Fire Review Fire Alarm System in accordance with NFPA 72 and NFPA 101 shall be installed, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Architect Response: A note has been added to sheet A-3 .1that the fire alarm system shall comply with NFPA 71 and NFPA 101. Fire Review Sheet C2.1 civil site plan shows the north existing parking asphalt as 24' the scale is 1 "=20' this area is only 17' Plans do not match scale. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1. Fire Review Must meet the requirement of FAC 69A60 Florida Fire Prevention code to install signage at entry doors to identify if this building has been constructed with lightweight truss floor and roof system. You may contact this office for a copy of details at 727-562-4327 X 3062. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB Architect Response: A note has been added to sheet A-3.1 that signage identifying the building has been constructed with lightweight truss floor and roof system. Environmental Please Note: An Asbestos Survey is usually required prior to conducting any demolition or Review renovations. Please contact Pinellas County Air Quality (464-4422) for further information. Architect Response: Acknowledged, an Asbestos Survey may be required prior to conducting any demolition or renovations. Stormwater The following shall be addressed prior to issuance of Building Permit: Review Contractor shall clean the existing storm water management system and restore it to a permitted condition as needed NES Response: Acknowledged, Contractor shall clean the existing storm water management system and restore it to a permitted condition as needed. General note: 1. All resubmittals shall be accompanied with a response letter addressing how each department condition has been met. 2. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Architect and NES Response: General note items 1 and 2 are hereby acknowledged. Planning Provide a map showing the 1,500 foot radius where no other social/public service agencies Review exist. NES Response: Please see provided 1,500 foot radius map as per your request; a canvass of the area revealed no other social/public services agencies within the 1,500 area. Planning Revise site data table to reflect lot width instead of lot area. Review NES Response: Acknowledged, please see Civil Sheet C1.1 for revised data table. Planning Provide wheel stops in all parking spaces that abut landscaping. Review NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1. Planning How will solid waste service the dumpster? Review NES Response: Mr. Tom Glenn conducted a site visit and determined the appropriate location for the dumpster; he is satisfied with the accessibility and location of the dumpster. Mr. Glenn provided his comments/review to Mr. Kurleman in an e-mail dated July 8, 2010. Planning Floor plan shows 3 ingress/egress areas and site plan does not. Are any of these required Review ingress/egress? Handicap accessibility? NES Response: Please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 for ingress/egress points. Planning Floor plan shows a porch and site plan does not? Review Architect Response: Sheet A-3.1 has been revised to indicate that the porch area is actually a covered walkway as denoted on the Civil Site plan. Planning There is a break in the curbing on the rear west parking area? Review NES Response: The break in the curb allows the flow of the stormwater to reach the pond. Planning What will be done with the existing dumpster enclosure? Review NES Response: The small enclosure is located behind the building and is not visible from the street or the adjacent sites; the brick enclosure matches the building and is intended to remain. Planning For greenspace to count as interior landscaping it must be planted in accordance with CDC Review Section 3-1202.E. Planting area near the current dumpster enclosure is not proposed to be landscaped. Revise NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 and revised L1.1; additional groundcover plantings are proposed adjacent to the enclosure and sidewalk as allowed within the available area due to the new sidewalk which has been provided to allow appropriate emergency exiting from the western stairwell. Planning In accordance with Comprehensive Infill criteria 6.e. the development must provide appropriate Review buffers and enhanced landscape design, therefore, provide additional landscaping in the rear retention area such as bald cypress or red maple, the area in the rear of the building can have additional landscaping added, the large interior landscape island near the covered entry has open areas and the front buffer along Range Road has and additional 5 - 8 foot wide area to be landscaped as the shade trees are located within the shrub row and not in front as depicted on the landscape plan. Revise as required. NES Response: As per your request additional ground cover has been added to the plan within the large landscape island near the front entrance to match the existing plantings and in- fill where needed. The proposed design provides appropriate buffers and enhanced landscape design as stated above; the mature existing trees, hedges and plantings are much larger than the minimum required by code therefore, offering an increased landscape design. Through discussion at DRC it was determined some of the above items can not be accomplished due to the large root systems of the mature trees; the proposed sidewalk installed along the Range Road ROW is the maximum disturbance the root systems will allow without damaging the future growth and lifespan of the oak trees along the front buffer. The area is nicely in-filled with mature trees, hedges and sod, creating a desirable street presence. The pond within the rear yard requires sunlight for evaporation of water, the existing trees form a substantial canopy; additional trees can not be added to this area without creating a drainage problem for site. Planning Provide one off-street loading space measuring not less than 12' X 35' in accordance with CDC Review Section 3-1406.A. NES Response: please see revised Civil Sheet C2.1 which provides the requested off-street loading space near the covered entry as discussed at DRC. Planning Existing sign is located in the site visibility triangle and is not setback 5' from the property line Review as required. Revise. NES Response: The small existing free standing sign within the sight triangle is currently under consideration by the Planning and Engineering Dept. If additional actions are determined necessary by the City to address the existing sign, the Applicant respectfully requests the ability to move forward with this application with the understanding that the actions required to address the sign must be taken prior to issuance of any building permits. Planning Parking lot needs to be re-striped. Acknowledge. Review NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised plans which indicate the re-striping of the parking lot as per your request. Planning Revise Parking Analysis to reflect Parking Demand Study. Review NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised document. Planning Page 2 of the parking analysis references CDC 3-2402? 3-1401 Parking? Review NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised document. Planning Remove references in the parking analysis regarding the inclusion of three drop off spaces as Review required parking spaces. NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised document. Land Assess the health of the trees on site, noticed a dead tree in the east buffer. Show to remove Resource and replace any dead or declining trees prior to building permit. Review NES Response: Acknowledged, the dead tree within the eastern buffer is not denoted for removal. Land Show all trees with their canopies, on all of the civil plans prior to CDB. Resource Review NES Response: Acknowledged, please see revised civil plans with all trees and canopies shown. Land If other departments require site modifications insure that tree impacts are avoided or Resource addressed prior to CDB. Review NES Response: Acknowledged, also a Tree Preservation plan will be provided prior to permitting to insure adequate protection of trees. Land Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, Resource landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the Review proposed building, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of trees to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to building permit. NES Response: Acknowledged, Tree Preservation Plan shall be provided as described above. Thank for the opportunity to address the above items; I trust that this information will be sufficient to allow the project to move forward to CDB. Should you require additional information or clarification, please contact me and I will respond immediately to any outstanding concerns or questions you may have. Sincerely, Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner cc: NES file 1010 6 ? SUBMIT ORIGIN ? SUBMIT 14 COP application are re ? SUBMIT FIRE Pf ? SUBMIT APPLIC k NOTE; 15 TOTAL Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue ater Clearwater, Florida 33756 ,- Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 AL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION IES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION - Plans and quired to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets tELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ATION FEE $ CASE #: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project (Revised 07/11/2008) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT,` PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME;' Alternative Treatment International, Inc. MAILING`ADDRESS 300 S. Duncan Road, Clearwater, Florida 33765 PHONE NUMBER: 727-204-4341 FAX NUMBER: 727-461-3651 CELL NUMBER _800-897_8060 EMAIL: info@atiwellness.com PROPERTY OWNER(S): Range Road L.L.C. List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. - Housh Ghovaee, CEO MAILING' ADDRESS 300 S. Belcher Road, Clearwater, FL 33765 Renee Ruggiero, Project Planner PHONE NUMBER: 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036 CELL NUMBER: 727-235-8475 EMAIL: renee@northsideengineering.net B. PROPOSED PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(,' PARCEL SIZE !(acre,, LEGAL DESCRIPTIC PROPOSED USE(S) DESCRIPTION OF F Specifically identify tt (include number of ut footage of., non-reside requestedcode devil reduction jn required parking spaces; spec C:\Docurr EVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) Alternative Treatment Inc. (For Interior PROJECT VALUATION: $ 150,000 Renovations) zizu Range Road Clearwater, FL 33765 12-29-15-70182-100-1301 1 . 165 PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 50, 741.59 See Attached Social/Public Service Aqencv I QUEST: See attached narrative request or square al use and all )ns; e.g. mber of use, etc.) and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 1 of 8 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UN DEVELOPMENT, OR jA PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ® SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) IN Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See attadlied narrative 2. The 'proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the valuethereof. See attached narrative 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See attached narrative 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See attached narrative 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See attached narrative 6. The design of adjacent prop( iSee att( C:\G i proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on d narrative and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 2 of 8 WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria) CH Provide complete responses to the six (6) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. See attachmed narrative 2. The 'development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district See attached narrative 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. See attached narrative I 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. See attached narrative 5. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. ;The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. jThe proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating ;jobs; c. 'The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a ,land use play amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. See attached narrative 6. Flexibility with redard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a. iThe proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district; b. 'The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City; C. The designilscale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; d. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of Ithe following design elements: ? Changes in horizontal building planes; ? Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc.; ? Variety in materials, colors and textures; ? Distinctive fenestration patterns; _? Building stepbacks; and ? Distinctive roofs forms. e. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. See atta;(4hed narrative C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and`4-202.A.21) ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. No changes proposed to the site, only change of business use. ? At a minimum,...fhe STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed storrwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable A ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stiormwater plan as noted above is included RMR Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. Per conversation at BPRC this is not required. Existing Development change of use only. CAUTION IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration E=ngineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) -One original and 14 copies- (15 Copies Provided) Per conversation at BPRC, the Surveyor is out of business, no sealed copies are available. TRE=E SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip Ilrjes and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; Per conversation at BPRC, tree survey not required, see site plan for tree size and species. TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of suohtrees; Per conversation at BPRC, tree inventory not required, see site plan for tree size and species. LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY, PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; See provided Parking Report GRADING PLAN, as applicable; N/A Existing PRE=LIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); N/A COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; N/A C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 4 of 8 G E9 0 ca SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; Footprintand size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint=and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; _T All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location bf all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location pf existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water" lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depictionty shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;. Location ofi all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening fper Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; N/A Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks; and Floor plantypicals of buildings for all Level Two approvals. A floor plan of each floor is required for any parking garage requiring a _ Level Tw&approval. SITE DATA TABLE for existing required and proposed develo ment in ntt /t b I p w en a u ar form. EXISTING Land area in square feet and acres; REQUIRED PROPOSED Number of EXISTING dwelling units; See Site Data Table _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; - - -- Gross floor area devoted to each use; -- - --" Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the _ -- number of;required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed-in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility -- -"-- easement;: Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and v -` - - Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'%X 11); FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: N/A per conversation One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; at BPRC this is not Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; required. Existing All open space areas; development change Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; -" Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); of use only. Streets acid drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural; overhangs; CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11 doc Page 5 of 8 . H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ® LANDSCAPE ('LAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; DrainageAnd retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Location„Size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule= Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions' of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. 123 REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape N/A Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ® BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS-with the following information: Please see provided photos All sides of all buildings Dimensioned Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations) Materials" U REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -same as above to scale on 8'/z X 11 Please see provided photos J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) N All 'EXISTING :freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to Femain. Please see photo ? All ' PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. C:\Docum.ents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 6 of 8 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • i Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on'the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trio generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to':Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all _ roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. RMR_ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION _ IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. L. FIRE FLOW ;CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Ca any upgrades are re( sprinkler,. standpipe the 2004 Florida Fire ? Acknowledgen Fi RMR Fi CAUTION CALCULAI RESUBMIT If you have quf M. SIGNATU I, the un 1r in thi a li kno e e pho g ph ons. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with ntion Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. it of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Please see provided File Flow Test Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW ONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE ED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. 1, acknowledge that all representations made are true and accurate to the best of my uthorize City representatives to visit and roperty described in this application. ?'ORY PUB tea: `_.- M k of _c?CP7F1Eb: ?i{ re of property owner or represAa a>°< Bonded Thru Budget STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA i Sworn to and subscribed before me this ?- day of 0- _-f?__ to me and/or by u hi A.D. 20-(6,L- who is personally known has produced P, L as identification. )EL eV 832 3, 2014 Notary public, lary SeMceMy commission expires: M Ar) ' C1Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Comprehensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 7 of 8 N. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: lRange RQad L.L.C. j ------- - - ---- ---- 2, That (I am/wry are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 2120 Ra[ige Road Clearwater, FL 33765 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a; (describe request) Comprehp`nsive Redevelopment Application ------------ ----- ------ 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Housh Ghovaee-CEO - - - --._.. .--- - - ...., -- as (Ms/theii) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affjlavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. ':That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7 Thal (I/we) the und> ned jauthori S, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. ----------- - `- _ - -- - - - -- _ ... . t i Pro ' -Own r._ Property Owner _... _ -r- ------ - .._....... . -- --- --------------- ----- _ Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of k ( _ . V \J personally appeared j?`( sA yr,`aI who having been first duly sworn Deposes ar,d says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. ..oy. t'y1j a?:Y'^s MARY M. WOLF L Commission # DD Eryl xpires March 6, 20133 -- - - - aF?,°,•` BondedThruTroy Fain lnwranceFUC-.fe5,,i?+4 5' Notary Public Signature Notary My Commission Expires: C:\Documents and Setting s\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planning dept forms 0708\Compreliensive Infill Project (FLD) 2008 07-11.doc Page 8 of 8 LETTER OF AUTH0RIZATI0N Thisdetter will serve as authorization for Housh Ghovaee (agent Name) with Nonhside Engineering Services, Inc. to act as an agent for Range Road L.L.C. (Property Owner's Name) And to execute any and all documents related to securing permits and approvals for the construction on the property generally located at 21 City (Property Location) erty Owner Print Name of Pr perty -caner Title 4 37 Telephone Number State off l( %i? jyj _ The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me ,_this 21 ` day County of ..O n of. 201 by }?1Y1:: f .t)n("j as who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. V 1 Notary Public (Signature) is1Y'^yq?,, WRY M. WOLF k? *= commission # DD 863525 P Expires March 6, 2013 ommission # - odF„°,••` BoldedTMuTroy Fain Worance800385-7019 (SEAL ABOVE) (Name of Notary Typed, Printed or Stamped) Ranae Road Clea i ai I LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRip THAT PAffjj1T OF LOTS 13 AND 14 IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PINELLA51GROVES,I INC., ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 15, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINEI-AS COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. ?I FROM THC SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST, RUN THENCE S 89°20'02" E ALONG THE 40 ACRE LINE, ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE OF RANCEi ROAD ?p.52 FEET FOR T14L POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUES 89'20'02" E ALONG THE SAID 40 ACRE LINE 152112 FEET; THENCE N 00'Q5'54" E 352.18 FEET, THENCE N 88145'14" W 162.14 FEET, THENCE S 00105`54" W 351182 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS AND': EXCEPTIJ HAT PORTION WHICH LIES WITHIN 40 FEET OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST.1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1 4 OF SAID SECTION 12, CONVEYED TO PINELLAS COUNTY FOR 'PUBLIC RIGHT--OF-WAY IN Q.R. BOOK 4427, PAGE"1,1688 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 50,141:59 SO/FT, OR 1.16 ACRES MORE OR LESS. ( k: I fLi f. Ill : 200422904 4 BK $10.50 Cuny, $8.00 of COURT .PINELLAS 13`620 PG: 832, 06/03/2004 at 05:05 PM, RECORDING 2 PAGES D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $8750.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK CO[)t1TY, FL BY DEPU'T'Y CLERK: CLKDMC8 This lhlcumcnl Prepared fly and Ilelurn lo: John P. Martin, P.A 401 S. Lincoln Ave-' Clearwater, FL 33756 Parcel 111 Number: 12-29-x'15-70182-100-1301 Warranty '1'llis Indenture, t American Board Inc., a:'corpor Pennsylvania of me County or Centr Range Road, L.'. whose address is: 4 0 0 C 01'111C County 01' P1ne7 Witnesseth lhattheGR and olher good and vah grmued, bur6Pincd and so lying and being it) (ho Coll See Attached Subject to re any, and taxe, eed this 1st day of June , 2004 A.D., Between Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Physicians, on existing under the laws of the State of , ? t t ? t t I t ? t Slate of Pennsylvania grantor,, -orld` C., a Florida limited liability company -- veland St., 7th Floor, Clearwater, FL 33755 is State of Florida , grantee.', - - - TOR, for and in consideration of the sum of --------TEN DOLLARS ($10) --------------- w\ ?---- DQLLARS, dconsideration to GRANTOR in hand paid by GRANTEE, Elie mccipt,.whcreof is ?heretiy acknowledged, has i the said GRANTEE and GRANITE'S heirs, successors and assigns foevef. ia-following'desovibeyl1and, situate, if' Pinellas State of Florid t tow,lt. ichibit "A" frictions, reservations and pasQmbrltp d,ft\record, if 'subsequent to 2003. Iv, I t " r and the grantor dyes hereby; lidly warrant the N1e`lo sajrl'land, and will,Aefend the same against lawful claims of all persans whomsoever. ` , III Wltfless, WIMMA, tli@{grnumr hp-h"uumo soy its hand nod sent the day and year first above written. Sigued, sealed unrl delivei`od in/fur pros'ence:` American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Physicians, I Tnc. _ J By: (Seal) Prin 6& Name -- Dr. Arthur rode. Witness,' - as Chairman of the Board - - -• 11.0. Address: 946 N. Atherton, State College, PA 16801 Printed' Name .?^ ILf?I? S CooC)) Witness??' i (Corporate Seal) COMMONWEALTH Or -0 i"plc ? S COUN'TY.OF(-'ovk' 'I"hc furegufng instrument 'sn$ acknowledged before me this 1St day of June , 2004 by Dr. Arthur Brodar, as Chairman of the Board of American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Physicians, Inc., a Pennsylvania C0'+ oration, on behalf of the corporation he is Imsoually known to me or b,lins produced Lis Florida driver's license es 'tenlilicafion. Printed game: uFir?39K4?. y?qL Notary Public,. My Commission Expires "JR A I N.ASSIC > I ,••;,,. , A61, RAf4GERU - Lnmr CcncrelaJ by 0 Dirpl,y Splaiu, Inc., 10m tBel) 163-5511 form FOVD-1 PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 13620 PG 833 Exhibit "A" is That part, of Lots 1k and 14 in the Northeast one-quarter (NE1/4) of Section 12, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, PINELI_AS GROVES 'as recorded in Plat Book 3 page 15, Public Records of.Pinellas Couhty, Florida, described as follows: From the Southwest corner of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (N E1/4) of Sections l2, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, run thence South 89 deg. 20'02" East, along the 40 acre line; 288.52 f6et for the Point of Beginning; thence continue South 89 deg. 20'02" East along the 40 acre line, 162.12 feet; tAo` nce North 0 deg. 05'54" East, 513.50 feet to the Southerly right of way of the S.A.L. F3ailr-oad; thenc . Florth 72 deg. 56'03" West along said Southerly right of way, 169.49 feet, thence South 0 deg. 06'54' ; st 561.3.' feet to the. Point of Beginning. LESS AN D EXCEPT that portion thereof which lies within 40 feet of the south line of the Northeast-114,(141E,114) of the Northeast 1/4 (NE1/4) of said Section 12, conveyed to Pinellas County for public right-of-W4y by D@ed recorded WO.F2. Book 4427 page 1688, Public Records•of Pinellas County, Florida. AND LESS AND EXCEPT that portion thereof conveyed by Deed recorded in O.R. Book 11445, Paae 1?"12 of the Public Recordd of , inellas County, Florida and being more particularly described asifotlows: Frorathe-Southwest corner of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) of the Northeast Quarter (NE1/4) of Sectiom 12, Township 29 South, Range' T5 East, Pinellas County, Florida, run thence South 89' 20'02" East along the 4,0 acre 4114, also being the centerline of Range Road, 450.64 feet;.thence North 00' 05'54" East, 40.00 feet to a pQint_on We Northerly right- of-way line of Lange Road, thence continue North 00' 05'54" East, 312.18 feet to the P6`100f Beginning; thence North 58' 45'14" West, 162.14 feet; thence North 00° 05'54" East, 207M feet to a point on the Southerly right-of- way line of a 100 foot Seaboard Coastline Railroad Right-of-Way; thence,a)org said,Qoutherly right-of-way, South 72' 56'03" East, 169.49; thence South 00' 05'54" West, 161.32 faeMp the F'ofrtt of134ginning. Northswide ,5'?tqettee,reaq. Vim,. EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 2120 Range Road Section B. Description of Request Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports Re-Zoning, Land Use, Annexation Stormwater Management Utility Design Traffic Construction Administration The Applicant proposes to change the use of the property from an Office use to a Social/Public Service Agency use as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The subject property is a 1.16 acre site. Specifically, the Applicant requests flexible development approval with: a. a Lot Area of 50,741.59 square feet (1.16 acres); b. a Lot Width of 162.29 feet; c. an existing height (above BFE) of 25' to mid-point of highest roof, d. an existing front (south) setback along Range Road of 118.60' to the existing building and 15' to the existing pavement; e. an existing side (east) setback of 46.65' to the existing building and 10' to the existing pavement; f. an existing side (west) setback of 14.7' to the existing building and 8' to the existing pavement; g. an existing rear (north) setback of 61.35' to the existing building and 13.25' the existing pavement; h. providing for 39 parking spaces on site; i. providing 10.1% parking lot interior landscaping; j. an impervious surface ratio of .687; lc. F.A.R. of 0.29 as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project with reductions to the landscape requirements through a Comprehensive Landscape Application with a reduction to the shrub requirement to the north perimeter landscape buffer, a reduction to the interior landscape island width from 8' to 4' and reduction to the interior landscape size from 150 sq. ft. to 68 sq ft as a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of CDC Section 3-1202.G. 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, Florida 33765 1 tcrh?nprt;hsideengincetingservie?t?s.rc?tl? 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 Background Discussion The existing 14,830 sq. ft. structure was constructed in 1982 and is currently occupied by an office use. The site, building and landscaping are well maintained and attractive. This request will allow the use of the existing site and building to convert from an Office use to a Social/Public Service Agency use which is a permissible use within the IRT District and within the IL Future Land Use. Proposed Use Alternative Treatment International, Inc. provides individualized services and a safe, therapeutic environment for those who suffer from the effects of depression, trauma, substances, and other emotional and spiritual disorders. ATI works with clients to heal body, mind and spirit in a peaceful setting. The majority of the clients reside off-site at residential quarters (approved for up to 24 residents); the clients are brought to the site by van daily between the hours of 8 am - 5 pm to participate in various counseling sessions, therapy sessions, attend presentations by guest speakers and to receive treatments. The facility also provides on-site overnight stays for no more than 10 clients desiring more intensive counseling and therapy treatments. Approximately 20 employees cover three shifts; the average number of employees during a shift is 5-6 with less during the 1St and 3`d shifts. The on-site overnight clients are provided catered meals from an outside company; a break-room is provided and is equipped with a refrigerator for cold drinks and a micro-wave for reheating of meals or snacks. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The existing development is in harmony with the bulk, coverage, density and scale of the adjacent commercial properties. The adjacent sites are comprised of similar setback, building scale, bulk, coverage and density. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. A decrease to the adjacent land and buildings is not anticipated as a decrease to the project site value is not anticipated; the site and building will continue to be well maintained which will continue to support the property values of the surrounding lands. The use is permissible within the district and will not hinder or discourage appropriate development. 2 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The existing development and proposed center will not negatively affect the workers in the neighborhood, the use is completely contained within the building; no residences are within the immediate area. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The existing development provides appropriate access and parking to service the proposed use; the majority of the clients (41%) will arrive to the site by the courtesy van further minimizing any possibility of traffic congestion. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The development built in 1982 is consistent with the character of the community and the proposed use is permissible within the IRT district. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The existing development and proposed use of the site will not cause adverse effects on adjacent properties; the business taking occupation of the building will meet the use requirements of the district and code requirements associated with acoustic, olfactory and hours of operation. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use and/or development standards set forth in this zoning district. The proposed deviations from Code are necessary and minimal in order to utilize this existing site. Certain deviations are necessary in order to accommodate the existing pavement setbacks and parking. The building is structurally sound and is in character with the surrounding structures. The site design is similar to some of the surrounding commercial developments and one of the most attractive properties within the immediate vicinity. Setbacks The relief sought from the setbacks are required and the minimum necessary to utilize the existing parking lot. Parking A parking demand study has been submitted to provide detailed information regarding the business operation and the specific parking needs associated with the proposed use. 2. The development or redevelopment will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as with the general purpose, intent and basic planning objectives of this Code, and with the intent and purpose of this zoning district. The proposed Comprehensive In-Fill Project is consistent with many of the goals and policies contained within the Comprehensive Plan such as appropriate and acceptable levels of service (sanitation, access, transportation) being available to service the existing development and proposed use; new employment opportunities will be created by the use, the proposed use provides a human service use which is appropriately zoned and appropriately located from residentially zoned property. 3. The development or redevelopment will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding properties. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood and will not impede surrounding development and improvements. 4. Adjoining properties will not suffer substantial detriment as a result of the proposed development. The adjoining properties will not suffer detriment of any kind as a result of this proposal; the property and building will continue to be well maintained, the site provides appropriate landscaping, buffering and parking to service the proposed operation and therefore detrimental affects to adjoining properties are not anticipated. 4 S. The proposed use shall otherwise be permitted by the underlying future land use category, be compatible with adjacent land uses, will not substantially alter the essential use characteristics of the neighborhood; and shall demonstrate compliance with one or more of the following objectives: a. The proposed use is permitted in this zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard or flexible development use; b. The proposed use would be a significant economic contributor to the City's economic base by diversifying the local economy or by creating jobs; c. The development proposal accommodates the expansion or redevelopment of an existing economic contributor; d. The proposed use provides for the provision of affordable housing; e. The proposed use provides for development or redevelopment in an area that is characterized by other similar development and where a land use plan amendment and rezoning would result in a spot land use or zoning designation; or f. The proposed use provides for the development of a new, and/or preservation of a working waterfront use. Social/Public Services Agencies are permitted within the land use category and in the IRT zoning district as a minimum standard, flexible standard and flexible use. New jobs will be generated by the proposed use and the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding uses. 6. Flexibility with regard to use, lot width, required setbacks, height and off- street parking are justified based on demonstrated compliance with all of the following design objectives: a.' The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in this zoning district. The proposed project is compatible with the neighborhood and will not impede surrounding development and improvements. The adjoining properties will not suffer detriment of any kind as a result of this proposal; the property and building will continue to be well maintained, the site provides appropriate landscaping, buffering and parking to service the proposed operation and therefore detrimental affects to adjoining properties is not anticipated. 5 b. The proposed development complies with applicable design guidelines adopted by the City. Not applicable no design guidelines have been adopted for this area. c. The design, scale and intensity of the proposed development supports the established or emerging character of an area; There area presents no real emerging or established character, however the existing development built in 1982 is attractive and well maintained. The building and site is in keeping with the scale of the area, appears to be a lower intensity then many of the manufacturing type uses within the vicinity. Please see Comp. Infill Criteria 4 for additional discussion of compatibility with the neighborhood. a. In order to form a cohesive, visually interesting and attractive appearance, the proposed development incorporates a substantial number of the following design elements: • Changes in horizontal building planes; • Use of architectural details such as columns, cornices, stringcourses, pilasters, porticos, balconies, railings, awnings, etc; • Variety in materials, colors and textures; • Distinctive fenestration patterns; • Building stepbacks; and • Distinctive roofs forms. The existing building and site is cohesive and attractive, offering an interesting and distinctive appearance. The building also provides the changes in height and building lines. b. The proposed development provides for appropriate buffers, enhanced landscape design and appropriate distances between buildings. The existing buffers and landscape design are appropriate and are more substantial than the majority of sites within the area; the landscaping and trees are mature and very established. Additional plantings are proposed within the large landscape island near the front entrance to the building, as well as in-fill of hedge materials along the eastern property line where needed. The setback of the existing building provides appropriate distances from the neighboring buildings. 6 Social/public service agencies 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas. The site is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The social/public service agency shall not be located within 1,500 feet of another social/public service agency. A canvass of the area found no other social/public service agency within 1,500 of the site. 7/12/2010 9:59 AM 7 0 Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled and folded into sets CASE NUMBER: RECEIVED BY (Staff Initials): DATE RECEIVED: * NOTE: A TOTAL OF 15 SETS OF THIS APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A COMPLETE LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION. COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: Alternative Treatment International, Inc. 300 South Duncan Road Clearwater, FL 33765 727-204-4341 _ FAX NUMBER: 727-461-3651 1-800-897-8060 EMAIL: info@atiwellness.com Ranqe Road L.L.C. Northside Engineering Services, Inc. Renee Ruggiero - Project Planner 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, FL 33765 -_...._ 727-443-2869 FAX NUMBER: 727-446-8036 727-235-8475 EMAIL: renee@northsideengineering.net 1. ARCHITECTURAL THEME: a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development. OR b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The maturity of the existing plant and tree materials on site provides a demonstrably more attractive design than the minimum landscape standards require for new sites. The Developer intends to in-fill with additional hedges where needed along the east P/L where infill is needed; the mature trees will not allow hedge plantings within 3' of the outer perimeter of the tree trunks due to larger root systems. Please see provided Aerials C:IDocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms-07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc Page 1 of 2 2. COMMUNITY CHARACTER: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. As illustrated in the provided aerials the existing landscape treatment clearly enhances the community character; the landscape treatment is demonstrably more attractive than any site within the immediate vicinity. In-fill plantings will be added to the large landscape island within the front parking area near the entrance of the building as well as additional hedges where needed along the eastern property line. 3. PROPERTY VALUES: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The site and landscaping is very well maintained and will continue to provide beneficial impacts on the value to the properties within the immediate vicinity. _ 4. SPECIAL AREA OR SCENIC CORRIDOR PLAN: The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. No special area of scenic corridor plan is in place for this parcel. THE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 12 MAY BE WAIVED OR MODIFIED AS A PART OF A LEVEL ONE OR LEVEL TWO APPLICATION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IF THE APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL INCLUDES A COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM, WHICH SATISFIES THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE USE OF LANDSCAPE PLANS, SECTIONS / ELEVATIONS, RENDERINGS AND PERSPECTIVES MAY BE NECESSARY TO SUPPLEMENT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WORKSHEET. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLA? this application are true and accurate to the best of my Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and A.D. 20_ILOL _ to me and/or by photograph the property described in this app"?i49. who is personally known has ?,•.•,.?•? RAM A.GOEL roduced L * * MYCOMMISSION#DD961lentification. - EXPIRES: May 3, 2014 4rFOF F?OP\?e BoI1dBd Thru Budget Notary SOrYICBS igna re of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: C:0ocuments and Settingslderek.fergusonlDesktoplplanningforms_07071Comprehensive Landscape Program 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 2 V - AV ?r Northsmide <l1"f(a 1. Mss "a'".'? 7 F 'e Civil Land Planning Due Diligence Reports Re-.Zoning, Land Use, Annexation Stormwater Management Utility Design Traffic Construction Administration PARKING DEMAND STUDY FOR ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2120 RANGE ROAD CLEARWATER, FLORIDA Prepared by: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 300 S. Belcher Road Clearwater, Florida 33756 727-443-2869 s +1`ee.... ere 0 60 ? ` 1 ? a 10 RaLn A:G(;q,, 1?D3,1P.E.TArA31 Die: My 9, 2040 " • 300 South Belcher Road Clearwater, Florida 33765 tech o@northsideengineeringservices,corn 727 443 2869 Fax 727 446 8036 PURPOSE As per the Clearwater Community Development Code: DIVISION 14. PARKING AND LOADING Section 3-1401. Parking C., the community development coordinator may require an applicant to prepare a parking demand study in conjunction with a request to utilize the flexible allowances for parking permitted within the Code. This report provides information related to the projects unique business operation and the specific parking needs; this information is intended to determine the number of parking spaces required to reasonably meet the demands of the proposed development. BACKGROUND The subject 1.16 acre site located on Range Road between North Hercules Avenue and North Belcher Road in the City of Clearwater, Florida and is identified by the Pinellas County Property Appraisers office as Parcel # 12-29-15-70182-100-1301. The site is located within the Industrial, Research and Technology (IRT) Zoning District and is currently occupied by an office use. Please See "EXHIBIT A" For Location Map This proposal merely contemplates a change of use from office to Social/Public Service through a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application. This development proposal includes re-use of the existing site and site improvements including, the existing landscaping, parking and structure containing 14,830 square feet of gross floor area. The City of Clearwater Community Development Code (Code) requires 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for the proposed use. Based upon the above requirements 44 parking spaces are required for the proposed use; the site provides 39 parking spaces including two handicapped parking spaces and a drop-off area near the main entrance to the building. Please See "EXHIBIT B" For Site Plan 2 EXHIBIT 'A" L OCA TION MAP NORTH Z 2 m LOGAN ST. LOGAN ST. S. LAGOON CIRCLE Q Q PROJECT LOCATION GENTRY ST. 2120 RANGE ROAD W ? j u U U L W Z RANGE RD, 00 w z o ? a WEAVER PARK DR. Q Q-. U PALMETTO ST. ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC. Northside PROJECT LOCATION. 2120 RANGE ROAD 5a#wwtewq, Smv&e4, ?KC. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 PARKING DEMAND FOR THE PROPOSED USE Alternative Treatment International, Inc. (ATI) provides individual services in a therapeutic environment for those who suffer from the effects of depression, trauma, substances, and other emotional and spiritual disorders. ATI provides off-site housing for 25 clients at remote guest quarters; the 25 clients participating in the off-site residential program are required to leave their vehicles at the guest quarter at the start of the six week program. Clients are shuttled to the Range Road center each day at 8 am by way of courtesy van to attend various counseling sessions, therapy sessions, treatment and presentations by guest speakers. At 5 pm each day the clients are shuttled to the off-site guest quarters in the same courtesy vans they arrived in. ATI is licensed by the State to provide this off-site residential service to no more than 25 clients. ATI also provides on-site residential treatment to 10 additional clients who desire more intensive counseling and therapy treatments; ATI is licensed by the State to provide this service to no more than 10 clients. Approximately 20 staff members cover three shifts with the average number of staff during a shift being 6; fewer staff members are required for the 1St and 3rd shifts. This analysis assumes 6 staff members will be present all hours for the purposes of the demand calculation. The site provides 39 parking spaces and client drop-off area near the port cochere. The 14,830 square feet of gross floor area requires 44 parking spaces for the site. Further, the sites location between Hercules and Belcher Road provides additional options as both corridors are located on PSTA bus routes and may provide transportation options to any employees who may need or desire to utilize public transportation. The 1St floor will be utilized by all 35 clients and is devoted to 10 offices for private counseling sessions, private consultations with the Physicians and therapy sessions; two workout rooms, a sauna, restrooms, a small conference room, a break-room and other various professional interior areas typically found in an office environment. The entire second floor of the existing structure is devoted to the 10 on-site residential client guest quarters. 3 EXHIBIT "B" SITE PLAN i FOR 5/8' LB3889 UTILITY POLE Go 17 04 Tn r7 LOT 13 FOR 1/2' LB6942 0.11.s 0.31' W -lam NORTHERLY R/W RANGE ROAD 40' LESS-OUT FOR ROAD R /W O.R. BOOK 4427 PAGE 1888 288.52' (D) aiTNwESi caier?R ------ ORTHEAST 1/4, NORTHEAST A ECTION 12, T29S, R15E - P_0.81 - N89'20 20.5' ASPHALT PAVEMENT _--_-yr--_1^•L RANGE ROAD LOT 14 O O a X40 ACRE LW SEC 12-25-15 Nl?ORTH? ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC. mfortilsigle PROJECT LOCATION.• 2120 RANGE ROAD gag&eote rg Sou eed, Sac. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33765 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS Alternative Treatment International, Inc. 2120 Range Road Clearwater, Florida Total On-Site Parking Spaces = 39 Total Spaces Available (excluding for Drop-Off area) Available Time Period Spaces Occupied Spaces Occupancy Peak 10 Clients 6 Staff Members 3 vans 20 Spaces 49% 8:00 am - 5:00 m Total = 19 Spaces 10 Clients 12 Staff Members (shift change) 14 Spaces 64% PEAK 3 vans 4:30 m - 5:00 m Total = 25 Spaces 10 Clients 6 Staff Members 23 Spaces 41% 5:00 m -12:00 am Total = 16 Spaces 10 Clients 12 Staff Members 17 Spaces 56% (shift change) 11:30 m - 12:00 am Total = 22 Spaces 10 Clients 6 Staff Members 23 Spaces 41% 12:00 am - 8:00 am Total = 16 Spaces 10 Clients 12 Staff Members (shift change) 14 Spaces 64% PEAK 3 vans 7:30 am - 8:00 am Total = 25 Spaces Prepared By: Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 300 S. Belcher Road Clearwater, Florida 33765 4 CONCLUSION As 71% of the clients will arrive to the site by courtesy van minimizing any possibility of traffic congestion and parking issues; the site design provides appropriate access and parking to service the proposed use. The sites location between Hercules and Belcher Road provides PSTA bus routes options for any employees who may need or desire to utilize public transportation. The adjoining properties will not suffer detriment of any kind as a result of this proposal; the property and building will continue to be well maintained, the site provides appropriate landscaping, buffering and parking to service the proposed operation and therefore detrimental affects to adjoining properties are not anticipated. The City of Clearwater Community Development Code (Code) requires 3 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for the proposed use. Based on this requirement 44 parking spaces are required for the proposed use; the site provides 39 parking spaces, five fewer spaces than required by the Code. As per the attached Parking Demand Analysis, at peak occupancy 14 parking spaces remain unoccupied demonstrating the requested 5 space deficit will not have a negative impact on the site as the specific and unique parking demands for this business will be met with sufficient parking being provided. NES 1010 Alternative Treatment International .Parking Demand Study rmr/RMR 07.09.10 5 2120 RANGE ROAD - ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT INTERNATION, INC. 1,500 FOOT RADIUS - NO KNOWN SOCIAUPUBLIC SER VICE A GENCIES EXIST 05/27/2010 69:48 72756214961 PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 02 FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT IRESIDUAL., PSI 05/27/2010 V19:49 7275624961 PUBLIC UTILITIES PAGE 63 Cltvl of Page 1 Clearwater May 25,2010 / 13:55 Hydl.ant Test Service Order Action: Created Icy: PCOOPER fACiTOI] Code: k. iTST May-25-I0 13:54 004022 1 111 11 . fl II IIII II I I I I II Effective Date: 11a I v^26-2010 Distribution: WATER Customer: 2135:388 NOR'TTjSTDE ENOTNEERIING SERVICES Phone numbck( )_BU S 27 443 2869__ - --- . --...... Account; 4171040 NORTUSI:DE ENGTNFERING SERVICES TNC I) B A; Comment; 2120RAN(YkRD ONr: HYDRT sa LOT 13 , aura- I ?pa a FOR 5 4"E! SB6'45'02'E; X '?R/ ff `836°` N x 162.D6' M, L83669 LEGEND E 183 m n war ':a ?,-I 1 u`?i _ _ I sl ?• ,®? ?° µ' ?„y„ 6 u ALL PARICNG SPACES ARE TO BE RESTR/PED. M J ? n n Elks rs'J64 s' 5' 3b 2 1Y GYM/f?AWCO® ecJ TT 10. 46.6 TWO STORY MASONRY BUILDING LOT 13 NO. 2120 >A LOT 14 es.. cea en.y.. r. .rc !fI/Yitl! ( Pro'sdi 1010 lass Dd.: 0512111D i 6 Rm.ias: 46. W 1 `n Y k'rffi_t?QLgc? Q o.#:' Ot ??r N r , J it p 20' p Z ail IW` IY Y 7 LO 3 LOT 14 ;r r aea a 0 CR 942 L 0', T ?? rRUntae CWC 0.11 5 gy.?1rE ]D G 0.31 W ?_11e/ Q Z ?. n rac ? W . ea+nce.. 6i. e.?cc mw 1/2• ?I J - Ci ,?2 a f-' a :. 2 o0 16 oRR?,'? a ?F- oLL ,? ar m o - m« -? _- .®6aax td?3 Evsnxcc u aseu? Z Q d x on mac .ax> auz .sr«ur aw W W _i 1 t - ___-_-___?06. + N892002'W 162121R 1622 Y ~w J ~ ?'a'? RANGE ROAD 12 -,y """ NORTH ?J Q ? ""' 4Cnw ?; 1295, wfY 3?.5 "dui vM T -€o a`_'-'____'. C: ?t lest Sf.'M.E: 1 ?2U p «• Nor?thslds 0 10 20 a m ?? o I , I LOT 13 I S8 45 14 E C . Q FCIR 5/8 , E 162. S88'45'02"E PV . R 1 LB3889 162.06' M FOR 5/8- -- N• P7• j?P... ::. - r G'F iCE? •S -6 '. LB3889 . . (V E.O.P. EXl TINC? CO ED KING ?n A 1 ° UTILI POLE • • • C 3 U ? FLORIDA PWR. C. TRANSFORMER EXISTING 40 ASPHALT ° q...;: 24 6 c'1 NCRE pr) 3'X?4 STEP ? OAK BE A/C A/c /s REMOV D (D D) . . • I 16 M ' I ? N -' n RED WALKWAY " rT 16 / 5 ? O 3'X3' PLASTIC INFILL HEDGES %s . EXISTING 'EXISTING 3 " a WO STORY + .o 46.6 46.6 MASONRY BUILDING 13 NO. 2120 js LOT 14 / I 3'X3' PLASTI ? A/C 1 i 16 z*oo oB 46. LLJ C/S © ° QQO , o •:::• I o' LOADINN ZC?LJ? T1 TY POLE 0 ED C3 16 ' TR AS PH } 22 « 3 2 g ??- D7 26" I A PARKI 0 . 0 EX I 0 z . HIGH E i LO 3 I DO IN-FILL GROUND COVER/N AS NEEDED , MATCH EX. LOT 14 1 I EXISTING 2tl ASPHALT DRIVEWAY a I-REMOVE EX SHRUBS I TO INSTALL SIDEWALK SIR /2" LB 942 24n ' 0 5' PROJECTARBO TOAPPROPR/A IST Y 11 3 ¢ . CONC. CURB ZOX20'SlGHT / I E 31' W TRIANGLE •V • /NS URE THE8' EAR , ALT RKIN \ yElGHT/NACH! ED :E ROAD FC ? 1 /2° Of U LITY POLE _ PLS 0«.Zp •-24 • R 1/2" WALK CONC. S / 492 162. ??. ROAD IDHw 10 Hw IDHw ---4? IGHw ---- I IOHw IDHw T IUTY POLE GE UTILITY POLE O ASPHALT O p 0 GENERAL NOTES _ NEW FIRE SPRINKLE SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED PER 2002 N-PA 13 NO COMMERCIAL COOKING WILL BE PROvIDE ON SITE. NEW ARE ALARM SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 12 AND NFPA 101 NEW SIGNAGE WILL BE PROVIDE AT ENTRY DOORS TO IDENTIFY THE BUILDING HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED WITH LIGHTWEIGHT TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF SYSTEM. AN ASBE5TOS SURVEY WILL BE CONDUCTED PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION OR RENONVATION E? PROPOSED 2ND LEVEL DETOX UNIT SCALE = N T.S. 1ST FLOOR 2120 RANGE RD. 10,410 SF SI-921 Storage L F-T Office j Office Office ELEV. __. Vv v EQUIP. Boardroo Break sto rage Storage Room : . 3- -i - LAV. ELEV 2-Story Reception Atrium Office , :--- ................. - 1TS Copy Conference I I - Room Telecom Room Office - Office _D' T e-+ 1 A b Server LAV. 18 -i Room --? 23 uv. uv. r - ' I. I__ l I Workout Workout Room... Room f i rv office office office Office - _. f Sauna I t!t IST LEVEL TREATMENT AREA ( NO RENOVATION PROPOSED) SCALE N?5. -7 S HI N ?ULs? U I ?-W ?v FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH) - NO CHANGE 3 SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) - NO CHANGE x---s 2 SIDE ELEVATION (EAST) - NO CHANGE 4 REAR ELEVATION (NORTH) - NO CHANGE xI E - ". .