The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2005-08060: PLT2005-00017 Planning Department CASE #: ter 100 South Myrtle Avenue C DATE RECEIVED: Clearwater, Florida 33756 RS RECEIVED BY (staff initials): rF r Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including NORTH: 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SOUTH: WEST: ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ EAST: JAL , * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Beazer Homes Corp., a Tennessee corporation MAILING ADDRESS: 2630 South Falkenberg Road, Riverview, FL 33569 PHONE NUMBER: 813-663-9002 FAX NUMBER: 813-663-9493 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc., 5260 (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - original signature(s) on page 6) South Landings Drive, #704, Fort Myers, 33919 F Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire AGENT NAME: Johnson, Pope, Bokor, r Rupee 1 & Burns, T L P MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER: 727-461-1818 FAX NUMBER: 727-462-0365 CELL NUMBER: E-MAILADDRESS: timj@jpfirm.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) 'a?L -? ' -gj L STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 2506 Countryside Boulevard ©NG 19 -20 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See_ Exhibit "A" attached (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) it7?+?1??7? PARCEL NUMBER: 30/28/16/00000/320/0300 QWOF C EAMA t PARCEL SIZE: 44.2 acres (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 240 unit townhome community, Costa Verde of Countryside (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Flexible Standard approval of attached dwellings in MDR Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Distr.ict.. See Exhibit "B". Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater I R ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "B".attached hereto and incorporated herein for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. ? Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: See Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. ??[ ?f11? -AUG 1 5 D PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater C111 Y OF CLE" R "ATER 0 '0 ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invo addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with t City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; - Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; - All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the manual. Q Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ?M?t tormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): plan as noted above is included provided. Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ® SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; J? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; J ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); .oO ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ?j? G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ?LJ ./JJ ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36" ): RE(cEWE _ All dimensions; _ North arrow; C Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; (t1 lC 1 8 2a?J Location map; d'lLAl7 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; f'??il?i?l Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PlN?±?G? _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; - All required setbacks; OF Cry OF CLGr1RVYAIEfz - All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; - Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ORIGINAL Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. J ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. .-9 REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); _ Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborisf", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ' ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: - All existing and proposed structures; - Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. -cr REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) (color rendering if possible); y ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); BEY COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. AUG 18 2005 Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater PL ARNING DEPARTMENT C111V OF CLEARINATER 0 ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ?? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; r9' REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). RECE'V E El ED ? Reduced signage proposal (8 /Z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 acrd 4-801.C) Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING 'DC?p"ry-'p ? • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. C1W OF CLEARWAX-9 • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. J ? Ackn le em traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway s and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property o describ,reo in this appft?p Signature(of rk6perty owner or representative Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 10th Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of August A. D. 20 05 to me and/or by E. D. Armstrong I I Z who is personally known X= Kxwd mxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYA )dOxti 1 akox N6fary pubes, My commission expires: Jayne E. Sears Expires September 2, 2009 Balled Troy Fain - Insurance, Inc. 800.385.7019 Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Standard Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL AFFIDAvIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc., a Florida.corporation - (Names of all property owners on deed please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 906 coin reside Boulevard (Parcel No. 30/28/16/00000/320/0300) 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible development approval Plat approval 3. That the undersigned (hasfiave) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel.& Burns, LLP as (hisltheir) agent(s) to execute any peftm or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That rite visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes city representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Executive Corporation of Clearwater, ProPem`Owner S. Lee Crouch, President Property Ownei STATE OF FLORIDA ) r-ruperiy owner COUNTY OF LEE Before me the undersigned. an officer duty commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this • day of June 2005 personally appeared S. Lee Crouch, as President having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. P,y, yet to F? t7L e b z0 -79 -z - 2 V- 7 - C7 *Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc., a Fla. corporation, on behalf of said corporatiorf' ?-` No Public -y My Commission Expires: WARREN L. DAVIDSON M4 6E)MI ! "': ePi 0 Fi' ; R44 EXPiRES:.;a^uar : 2007 6oneed Thrut,jtaa ?1, !-renters SAiPlanning DcpanmentlApptication fbrrnsltrevelopment reviewVtexible development apprcation 10045.doc UD E'57?'T- U\& ?UEVED AUG 18 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MY OF CLEARWWATER ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land lying in Sections 30 and 31, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the West 1/4 Corner of said Section 30; thence run South 0°19'55" East, along the west line of said Section 30, for 444.65 feet; thence South 89°55'13" East for 50.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue South 89°55'13" East for 1558.45 feet to a point on the west line of ."Dunedin Industrial Park" as recorded in Plat Book 64, Page 76, Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence South 0°04'47" West for 937.36 feet to the southwest corner of said Plat; thence South 89°55'13" East, along the south line of said plat, for 247.55 feet to a point on the westerly right-of- way line of Enterprise Road; thence 16.61 feet along the said westerly right-of-way line and the arc of a curve that is concave to the northeast, having a radius of 895.00 feet, a chord length of 16.61 feet and a chord bearing of South 9°27'20" East to a point of compound curvature with a curve that is also concave to the northeast; thence 261.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 330.00 feet, a chord length of 254.33 feet and a chord bearing of South 32°39'10" East to a point of tangency; thence South 55°19'05" East for 345.77 feet to a point of curvature of a curve of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 96.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 170.00 feet, a chord length of 94.82 feet and a chord bearing of South 39°07'31" East to. a point of tangency; thence South 22°55'56" East for 143.70 feet to a point of curvature of a-curve that is concave to the northeast; thence 286.62 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 405.00 feet, a chord length of 280.68 feet and a chord bearing of South 43°12'18" East to a point of reverse curvature with a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 102.23 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 250.00 feet; a chord length of 101.52 feet and a chord bearing of South 51°4554" East to a point of compound curvature with a curve that is concave to the west; thence 49.17 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 30.00 feet, a chord length of 43.85 and a chord bearing of South 6°54'15" West to a point of tangency, the same point being on the northwesterly right-of-way -line of Countryside Boulevard; thence South 53°51'32" West, along said right-of-way line, for 592.43 feet to a point of curvature of a curve that is concave to the southeast, thence 1059.47 feet along the arc of said curve having aradius of 1960.00 feet, a chord length of 1046.62 feet and.a chord bearing of South 38°22'24" West; thence, leaving said right-of-way line, North 67°06'44" West for 164.15 feet; thence North 10°30'36" West for 674.31 feet; thence North 62°54'47" West for 114.19 feet to a point on the are of a curve that is concave to the northwest; thence 98.14 feet along the are of said curve having a radius of 490.00 feet, a chord length of 97.97 feet and a chord bearing of North 21°20'58" East; thence South 85°55'13" East for 382.97 feet; thence North 53°18'37" East for 254.00 feet; thence North 10°04'50" West for 228.53 feet; thence North 36°15'14" East for 111.61 feet; thence North 14°28'28" West for 444.10 feet; thence North 58°15'59" West for 446.79 feet; thence South 74°3452" West for 206.75 feet to a point on the are of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 37.09 feet along the are of said curve having a radius of 590.00 feet, a chord length of 37.08 feet and a chord bearing of North 17°13'11 West; thence North 62°12'34" East for 288.57 feet; thence North 3°59'27" West for 431.05 feet; thence North 44°05'26" West for 445.53 feet; thence South 79°2845" West for 983.07 feet; thence North 0°19'55" West for 393.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. I?? ??,ul DD AUG 18 2005 P&MM ING DF_PfflTPAENT Chy OF CEEkktVA[Ep ORIGINAL. EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AUG 18 2005 2506 Countryside Boulevard P AX'XI GDEPARTMENT C1 V OF CLFAR IUAM-2 The reason for this request is to allow redevelopment of the 44.2-acre Countryside Executive Golf Course site, including the Dogwater Cafe site ("Property"), as a 240-unit townhome community, Costa Verde of Countryside. In connection with such redevelopment project, the applicant previously submitted applications seeking approval of a development agreement, rezoning to MDR and land use plan amendment to Residential Urban. Simultaneously with this request, the applicant has submitted an application for plat approval. In connection with the rezoning and land use plan amendment, and in anticipation of the proposed project, the property owner and the City have entered into a development agreement that will take effect upon the rezoning and land use change and applicant's ownership of the Property ("Development Agreement"). Specifically, the applicant requests flexible standard development approval of attached dwellings in the MDR District, pursuant to Section 2-303 of the Code. Section D. Written Submittal Requirements General Applicability Criteria: 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The parcels located to the west and to the south, across Countryside Boulevard, are either (i) zoned LMDR with a land use designation of RU or (ii) zoned MDR with a land use designation of RM. Some of these parcels contain attached dwellings. To the north and northeasterly of the site are institutional, high density residential and industrial uses that are located along SR 580 and Enterprise Road, which runs along the easterly boundary of the property. Across Enterprise Road are office and commercial uses. The proposed townhome community is appropriate for this location amid similar densities of residential to the west and south and mixed uses to the north and northeast. The proposed density of the site is 5.43 units per acre. Through the Development Agreement process the applicant has agreed tc provide certain buffers along the westerly and easterly boundaries of the Property. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Through adherence to the Development Agreement the applicant is addressing certain concerns of the neighbors, such as buffering, limited the height of 0 s ORIGINAL buildings adjoining existing residences to a maximum of 35 feet, and lengthening a SB to WB right turn lane at the Enterprise/Countryside Boulevard intersection. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. As previously discussed, the proposed use as attached dwellings is similar to existing uses in the neighborhood. The Development Agreement insures that all development will be in accordance with a proposed conceptual plan. The applicant has proposed landscape buffers in excess of what is required by Code in order to reduce impacts to neighboring residences. In addition, the proposed redevelopment will address drainage problems that exist on neighboring properties. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The applicant has separately submitted a traffic study to address traffic issues. The Development Agreement calls for certain mitigation for which the applicant is responsible. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The density of the proposed development (5.43 units per acre) is substantially the same as the density of neighboring residential developments. The values of the newly developed housing will equal or exceed the values of the neighboring residential developments. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The Development Agreement limits development as set forth in a conceptual plan that addresses buffering of the site from neighboring residences. AuG 18 265 P 9'L? DEPARTMENT C11V OF CLE?WWAt"D ? 0 ORIGINAL Flexibility Criteria (Section 2-303-A - Attached Dwellings): 1. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; The applicant has proposed increased setbacks and landscape buffering. The proposed setbacks will provide a sufficient distance to mitigate any concerns regarding height. In addition, although the Development Agreement limits the height to 35 feet, the actual proposed height does not exceed 31 feet, as shown on the site data table. b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. The Property does not abut any parcel designated as low density residential. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. This is correct. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any adjacent street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. The proposed site plan depicts screening of off-street parking by a 4-foot high fence. The areas where this screening is required are around the clubhouse parking area and two areas within the project where one parking space per home is provided outside the building. The two general locations for this screening are on Sheet 10 where a building is in the vicinity of the church parcel and the property's northern boundary and on Sheet 11 for the units facing Belcher Road. 8/17/2005 2:22 PM 45403.108701 #330065 v1 - Beazer/Ex to Flex Dev App 1D AUG 18 2005 PL,VM'WG DEP,"MMINT CEY 0 F C I I AM IVAiC HNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ORIGINAL ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON LEANNE LETIZE ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU* MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER September 21, 2005 Via Hand Delivery Wayne Wells, AICP Planning Department City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Re: FLS2005-08060 (2506 Countryside Boulevard) Dear Wayne: FILE NO..108701 Enclosed for your review in connection with the referenced case are 15 sets of the building elevations for the two different building styles. Also enclosed are sample paint chips and roof shingles, as follows: Building Trim: Door: Roof: SW 6387 Compatible Cream SW 6108 Latte SW 6106 Kilim Beige AC113N Spiced Rum Elk/PrestiqueSienna Sunset Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. L -5- L? U U, i III EP 2.12005 ? S PLANNING Sincerely, ?- Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant encls. cc: Beazer Homes CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 91 I CHESTNUT ST. 403 EAST MADISON STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) SUITE 400 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756-5643 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 -741- stics, t ; Eil - W 0 a c ro p 7C ? 3 m 0, fl O CD P ? N n 0 3 0 m nP CD w 3 V CC ^0 i 0 ro 0 p N P 00 W' CO ATTACHED SINGLF--FAIMILY 6 13 UO ELEVATION "B" 254'1 RI&HT ORIGINAL QVIS VJL 1 SEPgj ; ?U: L? LI: L NN N Vr VI amco nxn MO x a N X ill N X N Q a W W W W Q Q m Of 0 Q O Q z W Z a - K J J J W J VIn ZH m Q 0 0 N m co F W ?o 1144 Foa w VV) fNZD o V)g3zQ 2 a 4ww Wlt?Vl QQ?j W O? WZJ?'Z ZN Z NnVwOU r?a-Z4 w Q0 CC as Z=aWrZ?o o N?ro Z x zirQoio`m VJ O W Yt y-OK N ZU W OQ-JQ ?WW 7W ZW2m =ooNZZOo OZQQUO Of OW= N M r rnzaaUW? r?OUQ KW OK crZ-jolo aap?aaw ?a=aQm WyN ~U N ELEVATION "B" 2547f REAR ELEVATION'S" 2460 REAR EUVATION 'A' 2469 REAR ELEVATION A' 54T REAR c c h V W L 0 S Z U P P r O ? w ? o V) Z L' a n? (D W 3 ? b M? p N CT 00 co b? " a 0 w ? b m O El El F F L1O F[ r F v TOWNIIOMES ORIGINh?.I I i_ 0 [H] =o e o a? 6 N ? 0 D ?r7l [H] FI-11 0? 0 C? D D D Dl::] 7 EO HH 12 0 0 0 0 ? ZU OW ?rNo 4?"?tY oUOa t13 d i S ? L.. i m n O cQ ccU,OwI N ,-70X I3J?? J w J ?Qww WVI az?n :Do Q U1 ?- U Ua OOww? WNF . w p- N QQU JIY W O?ZQW QZ wO3wzJd_ ? J E Q d Q W r V1QV1 .ZUQ1 ? ,?QUwOO WOZ?UV7 QowQaoQw ? X: Vi .O NKr OI J W T? j O W? IQ O ONa ?Onwi Z VI O Q- J Q W W p U? 3 W W ? ? Nm ]J QWZ IO?U7Z Z=O ON?ZQQOUQ mNZQ QUwdN aua?pZaw ?Q?Qam wi ? r u I/i ,r Countryside Townhouse 4 UNIT VENETIAN ELEVATION - - - SAL Y Roof Layout Front Elevation ,r c G G= G G ?' G G ??? G G= F-I LB [71 Rear Elevation /sue Bea?? r I O 11l t2 . \ . rlw=S. r.IMW," SIOV jK ' AI S, WT KTU[• ACMU K 30' a "PIK. f1 (S V[ $-QW% OMB MR W.M rM•. MKYS La T(AIW?S SIIi![CI TO C"-"U nTNpVI 10? SIIIS w IOCJI10M1, 900V S.211, A%0 W . . WS&O A AK A" ?Ml ? WT Vptla. ACAS( S( CO COMStiwT SA S COW%S UO '* OS k OfSIGM '.IYRS. o ItAti ffUA[f • -*W% US? NC • I ?n •z ?U Countryside Townhouse 6 UNIT VENETIAN ELEVATION • I Front Elevation Rear Elevation w4 ?.[ ?I\ .v 1': ?' • ..Y \411 Y1 .h 1' Y?• T?•• i\ .•1, r• • , .. ?• ?'•Yi' ai. •t ., Roof Layout Bea erE • PLT2004-000-17 ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"' FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc. 5260 S. Landings Drive, Ariel #704, Ft. Myers, FL 33919 FAX NUMBER : APPLICANT'S NAME Beazer Homes Corp., a Tennessee Corporation ADDRESS 2630 S. Faulkenberg Road, Riverview, FL 33569 PHONE NUMBER 813-663-9002 FAX NUMBER : 813-663-9493 Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire AGENT NAME Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP ADDRESS P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER 727-461-1818 FAX NUMBER : 727-462-0365 I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. >hyxxxxxxxxxxxxxx *goma*x Ax f- ? fft• n ?Sig t e of owner r representative Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this 30 day of June A.D., 12005o me and/or by Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., who is personally known to me l+pr P ' Notary Public .• Y,?; LINDAA.CUNNIN HAM my commission expires: **: MY _,n COMMISSION # D 310910 : n Q?.. .. July 4, 00 4 008 EXPIRES: Jul 4, 008 11VE a Fourteen (14) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; -7F=D kJOS 18 1005 Page I PLI%%NING DEPAINIAENT CRY OF CtE,?'??dir"t1r lEi • • ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc., a Florida corporation (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I anVwe are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 250h Cnuntryside Boulevard (Parcel No. 30/28/16/00000/320/0300) 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible development approval Plat approval 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. , Esquire, and Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel.& Burns, LLP as (hisrtheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessar y to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater. Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representati%es in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (IMte), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is. true and correct. Executive Corporation of Clearwater, F d cor ikation Property Owner - By: Property Owner S. Lee Crouch, President Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA ) Property Owner COUNTY OF LEE ) Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of June 2005 personally appeared S. Lee Crouch, as President of * having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. P- /- t;7L C.' e 7 9 2 - v *Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc., a Fla. corporation, on behalf of said corporation- Not` Public My Commission Expires: ty S:Wbnning OcpartmcnitApplication Formsidevclopment rcvicwtnexible development application 7005.doc 7 ,S- - a WARREN L. !?n.'3p•rpl : A'1 G, 18 1005 P&I C9TV0F CLFA,R- lwg .08/04/2004 07:19 FAX 7273918589• 191002/008 R I G1 N 1SWARRAh3TY DEED,."e this `!. of of December A O l8 77 01355 corporation -k1-4 G40 rAcrJ036 t sting _fmJcr the laws of the Sole of DelawarL'.. hereinafter EXSCUTIVE_COR?9MTI0N ^F CLEARWATER, :called the Cnntor, slid ... - 4M ,+? ::.INC., a Florida Forporation- ----------- - a - ` 7 -- 3 y 14 - - •- --. r =? --- -- ---------- : c?2 zS ' 141532 8 2 -' g < } 7Zb001 OOC77-' :?L9>' .:_r t ;;xrr}r'c .J , . - e a ' s „ c?o William : S _ Jona- whose 'ina0ln ssenr Esq -, 1 - 87 - 0 41 i 2c OO ?». 450 :' t .' (jifne ton.ROa ,SN jarAo, Florida __ Z,P? 33540 a . 00,09 #' I , F r i{e ? ? ' ca a r ll iba ejid ?oberetna O c N x''63 F ' - ?'--WFTNE £!7G ilia( l h Cnntor, tor.nnd.in coaa..,6a(ion of.thesurrf;of ten dollars li10.00) and > - . jother raluablt:«;issidenlforu r(o=aid Grantor in band paid' thie recelpt ?vhefeof. ,ti':denby.acknowl l? ba f i b ` ° rga o a ld uMo the said Gnnlee, atld Criptce s heirs or successors 6 r ry t i t i l c la 4 C ' -and an %ws fore-,t. lE ll a attaur paroci o land n the r of. P(n oun and Stilc l dr Florida, to -yc 'v E$CitXBEQr,kE Zz A ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED _ Wi `HEREIPIa!EFERuT ? t ` 4?y?p L ' t.) =:? 4 ?? y SUF3JE a itesttictions =conaftio ns atld'?reserved ' :E rights`set; forth; On -ExhiZiit. B attached" hereto :and - :'., f],_ • :rr=: :. i Fcorpoirate ie?Ceirt :b?/ reference;:;.all,:of the, easements • ` ss l a1GgtdesCaGib?d?ror?reserved=:orr: Eicbibt*'C attached - ,er--aar?ot ear' l te,e-- ritie'`=of- governmental.',. auth6iCity a C > 4.4 cI? ?, s,f? XQ ' t-.. 7- Sa?-?':i f Yl ?? t1` F+r.?. r, \r? la• ,ti•? . r4 r_. AU G . {? ' p S?rCa - r,I'ot 1317 ' 1 $ 705 ;l C ?{ .?2. C r does hereby-fully. wamnt i?c tit'lc la aid ind and will d Mend the same against.. - wy.ad w 911persons whomsoever, exceot taxes for year 1977' and subsequent- ' o IKT --arYLaet heron for slneglar or plural the singular aha:l ?../ >- hider shall ?nrludrall [endsr; at eonte t reanlre?.. a ` 3 z wsr r;. U.S.. -HO CORPOR"TI - vF e, Tja?. Y, tester. g i, ?y l "wSfgted:'Siealcd and Delivered In'Our Presence: U x 1 s w ` President `c (Wit) -r ---- -- y 1 c 1.HEREB CERTIFY That on thus *; 714>,: December 77 hetor»aue, .a .lx ly aatlt'orized fitMe State and County,aforesad to lake acknowledgements s isoniltY apfieaicdi iw*/f7?s? 1fM) -- -.t?nrc?aN i-7. 7i swE.r?----? ",as';,i. ..£ __..• „r .0 S. HomeCorPPCdtilon-- z ?- ------- ------ a'Corporatiov _?- dndcr the laws o[ the. Slate o[ DelAwareL_ -_. ._i to me known to be-the person described "ln.and: who executed the Toregoing conveyance and 'acknowledged berore.m that. he executed the p, a .;=. .. :. Q ; >s3she,in lhr name, of;sxid:eorporation: that as such corporate officer.Quly_authorized by the Q^ corporitfoa to do so thaC,he affixed thereto the o[ficbl scar-of. said carporation and the said inslnt• %? cntJs the actand?deed o[ satdrenrpora4on s oc' 3 .? w l t ?33518? ?` a, !. ??. fvnt Notary Sul ? ',?t.?sVyrp? ?/? 'i ? .x ? Y`F ? ? i.. ? ??K?W? t. ???tYKti :1., _t!.wr„-•' 08/04/2004 07:22 FAX 727391858 i Al. • e.-I-4640 FAUN37 U003/008 A tract of land lying in Sections 30.and 31, Township. 28 South. Range 16 East. City'of CleatwatEr, Pinellas County; -,Florida and being more particulartj described as follows:.. COMMENCE of the, Iks, Cd Corneroisaid -Section 30; thence run $outh.0°19'55': Fait,-:6 ong.the west. I ine: of --sa idrSe; tf6n 30 `for 444:65 -feet; thence. South - li9°55`-13 East;for "50.01. feii-:-6;-1heiPOIh?._OF; BEGINNING; thence continue South--t.'.': 89°55'13". East fot' 1558:45.feet to`a:paint,od'i e:west line of "Dunedin. Industrial Park", as recorded in Plat: Book 64Page 76" R_ rds of Pinellas -.County;Florida; thence South:;0'04!47''. West for"937._.36.• feet to the southwest corner of 'said -Plat; thence`Sou#h'.89°55'13' fast Ali" th Soirth line of said 1 t for''24?'55 feet « ^_ -w Ile, ,. to. a polgt`-gn='tlie i?esteriy riyh>i-of-sway' tine oi~Enterpr'tie .Road ".thence 16:61 =feet r . - nionq fhef3i?t`tiite}?lyr`r ght-of??ie?y.line'and ifie:arc'gf a Curve'thht?ii'coiicaveo?`z4spr to°ttheriort?ieaf;ttiavingt:ttadi'dof895I00??feet;actroi-d"length of?-166feet<'s'? and a thord bearing of'.South 9'27`20'-East.to a point of compound curvature with a curve ;thais?alsa concave^16,the,northeast,jhence:261;09feet.along-..the; are _ : _;,;:`°a§ of saidturyd'Mvinga Tadiusroia330.OQ:feetalichor!!?1M9th of 25433yfeet=:acld!s??;-} is?concaVe,tt?`tlie 's btM+ett tfkate 96:09Afeet along. the ace=of s .tQ`cuKl!e Aa' i 4 39?Oifeet et: 7;'31" East to arpMat?of pigericy thence?South;2Z'55'56"fast-, 143:feet,"tb:a':point,ot?curvatyre:o;^acurv4rthaGtir``cone'ave:tq:the,noitt?wst?`LJieme,k "286:62_fee aTonq the`arc of=iatA7curve.Aaviiig`:::radius'af IOS.00:JeCt;EA;fliOrdy+, lengtfro Z$Ot6d feetEandi cctiotd bearing of ?.Spufit,43!12'18°:EaSt•tQ poinirof? ;. 'reverse curvature:iritli-,&-curve3 't:,is>concave to?the south?iest;? thence<TOt 23a ? i ''Y ?^ feet along tliearc of .'said curve.:.havinq a radius of 250.00 fe_t;::a:cAOd]: -'?•• <i of 10152 feet:and-a: chord bearing of South 51°45'54° East to a'point,of Compound ;:: curvature fth a curve that-is concave-to the west; thence 49.17; feet along the.' arc of said curve having a radius of 30.00 feet, a chord length of 43.85 and.a chord-bearing of South 6°54'15" West to a point of tangent the same 'point being,.,-- on the-northwesterly. right-of-way line of Cou.ntryside Boulevard; thence South,''. ...rf _ , :.,. ,.._. :.53°51'32't,West. alon9aaid right-of-way,_line;..for- 592.43 feet to' a:point;of <-::;>> curvature•'of;a curve. that is-concave-to the.soiitheast, thence.1059.47 feet.".along..: , the`arc of corn-.having-a- radius--of. 1960.DO. feet; a' chord length'6Vj1O46:62;.--:.;;;` :. .:: k -' feet aed' a: chord bearing'. of •South- 38°22' 24". West; thence, - leaving, said right=of-wa''j,.. - `.line;. North 67'06'44 West-for::164:.15 feet;-thence North l0°30136' Westfor'674:31 feet; thence; Horth 62 54.. 47 : West'-for: 1.14:19 feet to a • point on. the :arc of..-a= curare ,; ,4c r that;-i.s• caicave•'.to' the northwest; thence'!98.14,feet'along the arc of. said:curve;?` .?,; • tr. having::a-radius of 490.00-feet,a-chord:'leng th`of.97,97.feet-and a- cif*bearing of Hartti: 21'20`58" East; thence. South, 85°5S'13'. East. for 382.97.feet; •-thence'.North _- >_ . .228.53-feet;`-.= T`? 53°18!37":.East for 254.40. feet; thence: North. 16*04 1 SO* West for :'• thence North 36°15'14". East for 111..61 feet;: thence'North.14°28'200 West 444.10:feet';: thence North 58°15'59" West for 446.79 feet; thence South'74°34'52 -West:f6r:206:75•feet`to a point on the arc of i curve that is concave to`then _ '`-- :s6uthwest;,,thence..37.09 feet:along.the-arc of.-.said curve-having a'radius••of="• .:=:_. :, :_.:; ..• '590.00:feet,*4 chord:leogth of 37.08feet and a chord bearing of.K6rth'173'11! West;.:;thence;North-6i'12'34'.East for 288.57 feet; thence North:3°59'27":West. = r ;g for'43Y:OS.;fret; .ttierice North 44°05,'26': Nest':for 445.53-feet; thence-South k:,;.;= 79°28!45«-eWest'for 983 07.feet; thence.North 0°19'55' West for J93 61 feet to x, isg the POINT OF BEGINNING - - '- _ _ mot h zil n x -:... AUG JI. ??'_? :•?uY??-'.•:-t ATS:`.?.. .?r:y STS. ?!SL:. i`.:'., r'l%I,?? ;t'_-. `? 08V0442004 07:24 FAX 7273918589• . IaOO4/008 MENEM- ?' - R I G I NA L 0.4640 PAuJO38 --? EXHIBIT B tti 'This deed is subject to-the following restrictions,.condiEions. ?_ ,rte and reserved 'rights. ("Restri'ctioris") which shall run with the property. described. on Extiib'it A_attachect to thir.:deed ("Property")• ti and untilaermini1: . as., hereafter provided in Paragraph'. 14; and, thesg, S lgeserictions sfialL.be.bindi`ng upon the Prooer.ty,.and all subsequent e owngrs•thereof;whether or'not recited in subsequent:Qeeds:. } ( R a aaa.?.pq; 1. Fora period of..twent : = y (201 years from the'date of; recording. of,--this deed, Grantee (which term- .ashereafter used in`Fehf§.:- -,, Exhibit - any.-other. Exhibit: td--the::deed shall. - mean . £xecuti?yoy Corpor,a?trn of .Clearwater. Inc and--al.l-'.successors in. title toYth ' _ '° `' b:Yk h:..Propert}? ox .?ci}F Qart therebf? shall*niaiiiaittie Po" pct P f ,„fin' .::condforln`epdYr;anc(',)fol'lowirig tlie=construction.:oftar?;er?ghfeen'4`r?; (18} hole,`par 3 executive golf course thereon and necessary associated facilities,.. _alh;.as. approved.. by.. U.S... Howie Corporation,;in-:accorda?ge.: (",Golf°Course;.> a lft ') --)iaLh•?carj`.' on: Y wi:tti-.Ta=agrajh: 3 `hereafter. ,. y _5 fntenance'a :aff3 aromi '?" `` a? ?' s . '?o a •, . ?.,:: ? ` R o9.r nq io Ui` R ';H,. :,.•.. t.:...:.l ;Y` n;:a;first-c?ass?manner. a c`l:_. r- ??a .. . .... e??t that-- or,;gof=course projects of;a:=like:chaiE3cterin Flocida_. Graij:teet , durtnq suchAtwentl7(20}'.year.period.shalh also_cdmply substantiallti° 4 -'with all applicable laws,; ordiriai ces; "statutea',:;rules and),,requLaE)pn. - ..:of-.all,.federel,`state.and- loca g;aukhorities:and 'regulatorytag.ertcies ?'r y t s and in ttre event of any- loss, damage o7ccasualty..to..the Coif CouXie__ Facility,' or?any"pait.there . of, Grantee shall, promptly repairj`"restora*+« rap TacP or rebuild: such-damaged:;or:de§t=oyed-pottion,:•• A4t 2. Tor a period of twenty (20) years from the date'of recbrdi'n r'' of this deed; Grantee shall not request, initiate, g V .. join in or consent' , to any change in any zoning ordinance, private restrictive covenant,,-. ' or other public.or'private restriction limiting or clefinin ' g .the uses which may be made of the Property,.or any. part thereof or improvement,. thereon,.-cr. request..an y variance therefrom or waiver:: thereof ;;:a the development ,of. surrounding: land as :commercia'1. orN residential' *?juy)?:' 4 .:. sites;-:or:• other- change in the character thereof "wha'tsoever_ sha11, note _? s .y( constitute a basis :for variance or other relief from',this',provisionrti i The.Property: may only be used .as 'a .Golf Course.Facili ty duringsuch.t r-:y 1,3 twenty (20);year'period., and for no other use or purpose what soeveralk*t?? 3F >; _.4,.,. whether;gr:hot. .any other use'or .purpose;is permitted. by coning=;'or '"? _ flc other authority -• t:- , and Grantee shall not. permit the P'ropertg?;!;or.;4ny..part rei thereof,._during such period to be.used:-as . a :site for rental; housirig,;:r?:;xx hoteli't I* isotels•. or for sale housing. Until-such twenty (20): year period;._has,'elapsed no business not necessarily..'incident--to;;.thel.'i "s -;t ,.;_.i-r. .,. of the: ..Property- `:on :the r?} property,- as a Golf. Course: Facility may be conducted and`no other use. of- the Property shall be: undertakeri;.orn? 4.: Any-Golf Course Facility,,coiistructed _on' the Propertyshalli "?.; `f. only be in: accordance with final.plans-.which have first. been approved,.-, by U.S_. Home:Corporation.. .such;fiaah.plans "("Plans") shall include ;y' a-goli,course layoht:for:an eighteen (18)`hole, nar three executive ? g^lf_,tourse;--(ii) 'a site plan :showii the-iocation, use-.-,a nd detailed :? ;??,: enaineerf?l cF ,*1 -;r sed'amorovements - "including. but riot liinitedt.r?_ ' to' buildings,'..'fences and uti.lit:ies; (iii); all .building -plar(s: and'.; specifications and architectural'renderings and elevations 'aii) .all landscaping plans; and (v) all.-grading plans., and any.other engineering:or.construction plans and drawings relating to:.thel:.Golf' };k Course:Facility'. U.S. Ilome Corporation shall notify Grantee' oi;its ?b +a approval.or"disapprovaI of such:Plans,':or. any part there of;;wit;-;in:....: twenty (20J,.•days.after their delivery".to- it., U.S. Home:Corpora :Jon ., shalihaxethright,-at' its sole ;dxgcretion;.to:.disapprove?of,4ttt?h -'•``' Plans;orranyreason,_ incl'uding`ca thou Timitation r . ti) ;ribnco Hance ert with anytiria§tii landNuse °developmerit` plans br= engineeringF.pj'ans`or ;• ;; ?. amendments t)iereto;(.,laster..Plans")'affedtinq''any.,land::.of:':whict? foie Property^i? a'Partr:'(ii) `lack -oE-harmonv'zi?of externah desx n elevation with; structures to o ra fi 4. , ;cob o L fi P 9 P? ?Y>QnpioperQ?i?es ,r?itha?n` the` i a 1 8 2 G5 ~ r ,.. C? ? Y' C C.?A?t a?t1r' il.l' 08/04/2004 07 25 FAX 72739 ?D • : 1858 [a 005/008 AUG 1'8 2005 0RIG1A? c _? 4E l0 wi9:39 :.: CITY OF-CI-FAPVJA17cR - r?•. surronndinq area; (iii) type,• kind or-quality or mate rials or construction; or (iv) type kind'.dualit uantit r 1 t f ve. r ?;'?1CZ7 W -A 1 Y. q y v v oca ion o fencing,- refuse- collection areas and screening of bui:lding.,a:rOas, or .such 'being::deemed.inadequate.or unsuitable by U.S. Home Corporation: . An. initialled copy of?all-approved Plans shall be ke ton-file at U.S?--Hoine'.Corporativn's office:; a:t;'::.QrieT:COpnkryside. %Ofice _'??ark.; `•_ Clearwater:, Florida 33528, c- 'r- 1s'6Ch b -her : address' in Pinellas ' Coundy,-:Florida•a's U.S..Home . Corporat:ion:'.'rilay. designate-by; trument.'._. recorded-among the Public RecorBs.ofr.; inellas:county, Vlorida.': 4 Except=.for such.bui"ld?ngs•,"and `improvements permiEted?tci'.be cons tructel' puts:iant.to._Plans ..fgr.:the:°GoIf;Course . Facili"t}::as .-.-- apprdved. by1 t} `Home Corporations irt( accordance with. Paragraph 3 no, buiadiny mprovements.,or- oche gtriictures sha'll"heceaffer:ti'e',?i.>>? a.s < - _... , ' wY''tten'cbrisent`bf'[1:S. Home Corp'oiation_'-- • The Property is:subjecothe:-.erms:.and:'condiaions• ,_ ... _:-_£hatt•'ce=ta,?ti?'.AatraemPnt•' fns. Ann?va ?"fnG,??aa=a:T:v?::F:7•f'...iorf 7c?-we?:s.::.r«u ferzrG W 7.?su 3 r ori;:fi' a 3r t ` tti :city;of.•:Glearwa i .ranE?LA:;xhalf-aibidt?lby- -2r,; Mvi and pesforia,alh;obligatoiis `qf U; $Home. ?Corpgration `,tiride`'SUCh'.;; , Agreement as':such t.ay.!pertain tooth rQperty ;? a ,:Y . w- J, Asti- "- 6 t No fences; .walls or"' hedge?tthaYl.`beonstYucteiiacedt'b p?rmitted..,:onyahe Property, excepts`sacti:;as.:,ara".7ermittt pureuanb to the:'Plans for the Golf:. Course Facility a approvedz,by U.s:. -Home -corporation with: Lt. p_icr. wri*_ten -consent `oE_.U.S' Home? :a 1 Corporation, Which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld ,. 1 r 7: The Golf Course Facility shall not be artificially illuminated at any time without the prior. ,writt'en consent of J.S. Llome:: Corporation. :.:... = ';.. ' -? 8 :` Grantee:?:.dl"1 maintain a11=swal'es and"'other drz!lpags=....cfl' tie ;'ice -,- now or hereafter on the'Prbperty;,.-oGher.than those for which a-puhTic.' - ' ?. authority or a: private or public utility company is responsible; that; they effectively drain the"Property;.'arid,. shall°'not 4 1keY "an swales water- y such;,_?z . : . retention .,••: ? ponds or. othe r drainage facilitigiNini the Property,'withovE'.the prior written"cCOntent:of U:S.' Home.Corppration _•- ?c P. }z: 9r: WS'Home Cor oration.. hereby-*. reserves :'the ri ht:'to re Iiire?Y from _time..to: time hereafter easements. acro"ss the. PzoperEy for,: `; ....... , ;t utilitiest,und'dYainage in accordance:.+;ith iti master.engineering.plaris`_ prepared= for: the Property and land' surrounding the Property;'i all:=ass; ;=' ,e amended:_ from:.,time- to time, or as otherwise" needed. to serve: adjoi ing.:; ; land- owgie ov being developed by ;U.S::lkriie Corporation.' Si:cti easciileiits.shall b = granted by:Grantee to U.S_ Home Corporation or".su?h other.'yparty.. oo ; s 'part iesyas;U;rS; Horile CorporaLion`:shal'1=specify, without; charge ` com _ensatLon :of: an kind-and. u n fifteen' (15) da s' grit en re nest `` - provided., 'however:. M., such". easements.- shall`: not . prey entElre? use±ofthe';Q; ` Proper Yt as: a;-Golf- Course racilit ...•r Y::=.fii} the wcirK bf. placi_o);=any:;:'.>:? easeniei?ts'aiid'tiie. installation:ot:;pipe:rcond'jiCsequipeiit;,ut±>liE£es? 3-;? :;t or,nanlike:.manner; ,• expensei:to. Grantee, th-e'IOerson undcrtaking?such: woric.:.sha l p :r `ce Property. as. nearl..as 'pract; a-c'-`to"its "condition' prior`.`t?o^such:'wbrk fere'with:_ being "donef (iv) such work shall not-.unreasonably inter the. use4.:of,-..the Property as a Golf:;Course-Facility. and the;oerson undrtakingzsuch'work shall orovide::;temporary bridges, cross;41ks.-and t" other; suitabl.e-means - for rsons°,to cross over ditchesresultin ' i. ` from'.suchiwork =(v)'.'the. person;:underta)'ing.such .work shail7•;kr e ' . 'E'_. _.t rr r - :;prac_?a:ca6?e;:?dosso::in;>a=rannex.?to?A.,i: nimz?;-in.ter,ference,w±.-ttrt..,a•„f.-?sr•?•>F t:- CouzseK?Fadilt,ogeraE'onsr' (vi}?noYUtthties_shell:bg cgnsEzucteds? IR:o' replaced unles twenty t6 Ches (24 } be! '( ow the eur MON t. ??? vi`ibe or'• emergency" sLtdations'} -:,-: utility, '.Wq?{Home Corporation shall' n (15)' ?iay vI.0r?oY to the time: durfh w i ` i_,: undertaken and its approximate local o then,same..are_.buried at;?Ieast .?; ce grade?'of the land and??s? auiring`;the' rep3lof ffy.Grantee at•;,heas.? fifteen any 'such work shall it being understood that. ` :ee:shall,'be necessary;;- ._. Yy: a .4 r. ?'•}.1T. 4 4- L7m ,08/04/2004 07:27 FAX 7273918589• • f. AUG 18 2005 i . - P319??IT?7'? ©Pr??3???9'? 9610' PAtE?v0 10. U.S. Ilncr? Corporation 1)'-9+7 r^r, rugs the right lrvr.+ ti+r.C- totime hereafter, but wit:,out any obli t' / ga.ton, to" (a} drain w;:ter retention ponds on the Property; (b) replace existing swales with drainage f.)riliti.es using in-ground nioe; (r.) instali in-Irnund hive to drain swales; and (d 1+ construe[ swabs to redirect surfar.^ water and overland. flow on the"Pronerty from coming onto adjoining property. If U.S. Home Corporation exercises any of its rights under this Parasraph, it shall'be without expense or compensakion to Grantee, and.any such -work; (1) shall not prevent, upon completion, the use of the Prdpecty. as a Golf Course Facility; (ii) shall be done in a good workmanlike manner; (iii) follow+ng-such work the Property shall be repaired or returned to,a c*ood c ndition; (iv) §uch work shall not unreasonably interfere with the use of the Property as a Golf Course Facility, 'and there shall be Provided temporary bridges, crosswalks and other - suitable:means.for persons to cross over ditches resulting from gush work; (v) such'work shall be undertaken, where practicable,- in a manner to. minimite interference with Golf Course Facility operations; (vi) any drainage pipe installed under 'a fairway shall be buried at least twenty-fgur inches (2.4") below-the surface grade; and (yii)-except .for emergency situations, Grantee shall be notified atileast fift-een (15) days prior to the time during which any such work shal.X.. be.:'..:_ ?inilextzkerv and its approximate location' it being- undeistood`-.t(iA` neither, the consent or approval.of Grantee shall be necessary,, notite. to Grantee being sufficient. 11.. For a period-'of ten-(10) years from the date of4recording " of this deed, no sign, display or billboard shall be erected, displayed or placed upon the Property or any improvement constructed or located thereon or on any part thereof which has.not been'pi:eviously. ;• ar:groved in writing b_v.U.S_ Home Corporation as to size, color, "design, material composition and location- 12. If Grantee or any other person shall violate or attempt to violate any of these Restrictions: U.S. Home Corporatiop shall have ..the right to prosecute any proceeding at law or in equity against the persoh or persons violating or attempting to violate the-P.estricyions, whether such proceedinv "is to prevent such ?rs+ons from so do.inq. or' to recover damages, and if such person is found in the proceedings.to..- •?e in violation of or attempting to violate the Restrictions, he shall- bear all expenses of the litigation, including court costs-and., •.. _ reasonable attorney's fees (including those incurred on appeal):- :., incurred by U.S. Home Corporation in enforcing these RestrFct' ,i tons.. Jailure by U.S. Home Corporation to enforce any 'of the Restrictions upon the breach thereof, however long continued, shall not.be.deemed a waiver of its right thereafter to do so either with respect to such breach or as to any sinilar breach occurring prior or subsequent thereto: Issuance of a building permit or license which may be in conflict with these Restrictions shall not prevent U.S. Home Corporation-from enforcing these Restrictions. The invalidation of any one of these Restrictions by' judgment or court order"shall nbt - affect any ofl the other. Restrictions which shall remain in full force and effect. 13. .U.S. Home Corporation may hereafter assign either- exclusively or non-exclusively, in whole or. in part, any and all of its-rights whatsoever under the foregoing Restrictions including, but"not. limited t-, _tc right of eon_Pnt, approval, request, construction;:'termination and enforcement; providerY. however, that any such assign ent shall not be effective until i7.S: llome Corporation sha11- have oiven notice of such assignment to the then owner of the Prooerty, which notice shall be effective- if either mailed to the street address of thn Property, or delivered to any argent or representative of the then owner of the Prorerty, and shall also have recorded among-the P10)Jic Records of Pinellas County, Florida, an instrument evidencing such assignment. •'Any such assignee may subsequently assign the right: received by..':iimilar action. 14. 'Any'-written consent required of U.S. [tome Corporation pursuant to Paragraphs 3, 4, 7 or 8 may be withheld by, it in- its + sole discretion. Notwith:;tanding anything to the contrary contained in the foregoing Restrictions, U.S. Home Corporation, or its specifically designated assign, shall have the right at any time ,4liereafter, dnd at its sole discretion, to terminate the operation find effect of any or all of. these Restrictions and without regard .lo whether' It shall then own any land adjoining or surrounding the IA 006/008 ORIGINAL ,08/04/,2004 07:29 FAX 7273918589• Cj007/008 r 4 0 I\ I G 1 NAL y: . 640 pAr,1 041 . ' Property. Such tcrmina'tion, howe-ver, may only be by wt- ili:cn ' instrument. and shall only be effective from the date such instrument i.s recorded among the Public Records of Pinellas Count -Florida. Y. Z!? Other than u.S. home Corporation, no person owning any land, including but not limited to any land adjoining or adjacent to ' ==r the 'Property, shall be entitled to "claim the. benefit of, or enforce , or require -compliance with'these Restrictions, unless it shall have T ? been assigned the rights of U.S. Home. Corporation as provided in " f ? .ir _,.; ` w Paragraph".13 above. • i t • we - _ ". .M". :o . a Al. 7D &ul 1 n 2095 iP,'I NING ®EI'AMADIT CITY OF CLE?ARWATER 3 r .0.0/0„4/,2004 07:30 FAX 7273918589 U008/008 OR I G 1. NA L 6-f--4640 FAGED42 . -1 .1 EXHIBIT C 1 .z j i The property conveyed by this deed is subject to the following easements: _• 1. Easement granted by instrument recorded in O.R. Book 3951 , at page 30, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 2. Utility Easement granted by instrument-recorded in O.R. Book 3951; t a .page 28, and re-recorded in O.R. Book 3966, at page-124, all. of the Public Records of Pi ll ne as County, Florida. 3. Easement granted by instrument recorded in O.'R. Book 4223 ,- at page 1502, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 4. Easement granr6d by instrument recorded in O.R. Book 4563;. at page 1412,?Pubylic Records of Pin lla • " e s County, Florida. 5.. Easement granted by instrument recorded in O.R. Book 4595.x . at page 34, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida., ' 6: Easement granted by instrument recorded in O.R. Book 4595 . , at page 46, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 7. Easement granted'by instrument recorded in O.R. Book 459^5 , at..page 48, Public Records.of Pinellas County, Florida ^F ?. . 8. Easement granted by instrument recorded.in O.R. Book 4595.x..^ ::'`="" at page 52, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 9. Easement granted by instrument irecorded•in O.R. Book 4595 ,, at page 54, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 10. Easement granted by instrument recorded in O.R. Book 4602 . , at page 493, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. - `-' Grantee, by its accentance and recording of this deed, hereby . expressly assumes all of the obligations of Imperial Land Corporation> it " s successors and assigns, contained in the Utility Easement described as Item 2 above. In addition to the foregoing, the-property conveyed by this deed is subject to the following conditions,, which shall be binding on it and all subsequent owners thereof, whether or not recited in subsequent deeds; a. Such property, including its water retention ponds and areas, sh ll ac a cept surface, sheet flow and other-overland drainage. from all adjoining land, and shall be burdened thereby; and b. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein , U.S. Home Corporation shall have the right at any time hereafter: to . terminate the easement rights reserved under paragraph a above '- , and s;sc<_..,_rst:c^ shell not require the c:,nsent or approval of t.he. ^wner or owners of my land benetitted thereby, or require any such land to be ownec by U.S. Home Corporation. Such termination shall be effective upon the recording by U.S. Home Corporation of an appropriate written instrument so providing among the Public Records of Ginellas County, Florida. U ? ?_ E C E DD A J j 18 2005 ? I MING DEPARTMENMT erl. R CITY OF CLI:ARiJ'!'AA` ? ?. ;wry H • • PLT2004-00017 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD Date Received: 10/25/2004 EXECUTIVE CORP. OF CLEARWATER ZONING DISTRICT: OS/R LAND USE: R/OS ATLAS PAGE: 221A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLW CoverSheet FLS2005-08060 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD Date Received: 08/24/2005 COSTA VERDE AT COUNTRYSIDE ZONING DISTRICT: OS/R LAND USE: R/OS ATLAS PAGE: 221A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLWCoverSheet Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 7:14 PM To: 'John Andrews' Subject: 2506 Countryside Blvd John - The Residential Urban land use category on the property allows a maximum of 7.5 dwelling units per acre, or a maximum of 331 dwelling units based on 44.2 acres. The development agreement limited the maximum number of dwelling units to 280 and a maximum building height of 35 feet. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: John Andrews [mailto:mandrews0l@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 4:30 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 2506 countryside blvd Hello Wayne, I understand the property at 2506 Countryside Blvd (old Countryside golf course Costa Verde project) is zoned MDR for 7 1/2 units / acre max county wide land use but has a development agreement for 280 max units - Would you please verify that for me? Thanks John Andrews - Alexa Realty mandrews01(c?tampabay.rr.com 727-724-8000 12/20/2007 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:18 PM To: Lopez, Michael Subject: RE: Costa Verde The project is in your (Development Services) hands. If you don't give another time extension on the building permit or they don't resubmit to respond to comments, and you (Development Services) declares the permit void, THEN my FLS approval will become void. -----Original Message----- From: Lopez, Michael Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:44 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Costa Verde Nov 24th. But this project is dead right? -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:42 PM To: Lopez, Michael Subject: Costa Verde Michael - Could you tell me when BCP2006-03710 will be declared void due to inactivity? This permit application is still in "REC" status. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: John Andrews [mailto:mandrews0l@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:33 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Cost Verdi RE: golf course at 2506 Countryside Blvd. Clearwater. Hello Wayne, Can you tell me when the permits are due to expire and approximate cost to renew them. Thanks John Andrews-Alexa Realty mandrews01 @tampabay.rr.com 724-8000 10/2/2007 • Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:28 PM To: 'John Andrews' Cc: Lopez, Michael Subject: RE: Costa Verde John - The Development Services Department has granted a six-month time extension to respond to comments on this building permit to November 24, 2007. The permit is still in received status and has not been issued. You will need to contact Michael Lopez in the Development Services Department regarding fees (562-4567). If the Development Services Department doesn't grant any additional time extensions or the applicant doesn't resubmit to respond to comments, then the Development Services Department may declare the permit void. Should this occur, then the Flexible Standard Development (FLS) approval will become void. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: John Andrews [mailto:mandrews0l@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 1:33 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Cost Verdi RE: golf course at 2506 Countryside Blvd. Clearwater. Hello Wayne, Can you tell me when the permits are due to expire and approximate cost to renew them. Thanks John Andrews-Alexa Realty mandrews01 (cbtampabay.rr.com 724-8000 10/2/2007 • • Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E.Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:17 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: Request for Extension - FLS2005-08060 Wayne, you're great! Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:15 PM To: Jayne E. Sears; michael.delk@MyClearwater.com; Sharon.Pullin@MyClearwater.com Cc: Ed Armstrong Subject: Request for Extension - FLS2005-08060 Jayne - A time extension request is unnecessary for the case. On March 22, 2006, a building permit (BCP2006-03710) was submitted to construct the site improvements, in compliance with Section 4-303. Therefore, this FLS approval is vested. This vesting assumes that the applicant is working to resolve all comments on the BCP in order to have the BCP issued and that the applicant pursues construction of the improvements specified in the BCP. Should the BCP become void due to nonissuance of the BCP (lack of activity) or due to lack of successful inspections after the issuance of the BCP, then the FLS approval will become void. Regarding the two-year time frame for issuance of certificates of occupancy, I will issue an amended Development order correcting this time frame. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E.Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:54 PM To: Delk, Michael; Pullin, Sharon Cc: Ed Armstrong; Wells, Wayne Subject: Request for Extension - FLS2005-08060 Importance: High Please see the attached extension request for the Costa Verde project. The development order expires on 2/21/07 so we would appreciate your reviewing this as soon as possible. The original letter will be delivered to your office this afternoon. Thanks for your help and sorry for the short timeframe. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 1 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.• SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIN-PIN LU• MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL BRETON H. PERIvIESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL• CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON 'OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO.45403.108701 February 13, 2007 Via Email and Hand Delivery Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: 2506 Countryside Boulevard Case Nos. FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 Dear Michael: On behalf of the applicant and property owner, Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc., we hereby request an additional extension of time to apply for a building permit for the referenced project, for a period of one year, to February 21, 2008. The reasons for this request are (i) to allow additional time to satisfy conditions related to the site work permit, for which applicant has applied; (ii) unanticipated delay in obtaining FDEP permits; and (iii) changes in the current housing market which may affect the approved project. The applicant does continue to make significant progress on site permitting. Section 4-407 of the Clearwater Community Development Code provides that "an extension of time to initiate a building permit may be granted by the community development coordinator provided it is for a period not to exceed one year, is for the project originally approved and provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity." We believe this request for extension meets the criteria set forth in the Code and respectfully request your approval of the extension. CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. 403 EAST MADISON ST.' POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) SUITE 400 CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33756 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (23P 33601.1100) TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPMR: (727) 462-0365 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 • • JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Michael Delk, AICP February 13, 2007 Page 2 We have an additional request concerning the time for obtaining a certificate of occupancy as set forth in the first paragraph on Page 3 of the development order, a copy of which is enclosed for your convenience. Please revise this paragraph to reflect that certificates of occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit, to be consistent with Section 4-407 of the Code. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Very truly yours, JOHNSO POPE, BOKOR, RUPP URNS, LLP E. D. Armstrong III EDA/js cc: Ms. Judy Hull Ed Mazur, P.E. #397105 v1 - 0 0 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.* SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON ANGELINAE. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU* MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL BRETON H. PERMESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE No.45403.108701 ORIGINAL RECEIVE[ FEB 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER February 13, 2007 Via Email and Hand Delivery Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: 2506 Countryside Boulevard Case Nos. FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 Dear Michael: On behalf of the applicant and property owner, Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc., we hereby request an additional extension of time to apply for a building permit for the referenced project, for a period of one year, to February 21, 2008. The reasons for this request are (i) to allow additional time to satisfy conditions related to the site work permit, for which applicant has applied; (ii) unanticipated delay in obtaining FDEP permits; and (iii) changes in the current housing market which may affect the approved project. The applicant does continue to make significant progress on site permitting. Section 4-407 of the Clearwater Community Development Code provides that "an extension of time to initiate a building permit may be granted by the community development coordinator provided it is for a period not to exceed one year, is for the project originally approved and provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity." We believe this request for extension meets the criteria set forth in the Code and respectfully request your approval of the extension. CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. 403 EAST MADISON ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZB' 33757-1368) SUITE 400 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 171 ?J JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Michael Delk, AICP February 13, 2007 Page 2 We have an additional request concerning the time for obtaining a certificate of occupancy as set forth in the first paragraph on Page 3 of the development order, a copy of which is enclosed for your convenience. Please revise this paragraph to reflect that certificates of occupancy must be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit, to be consistent with Section 4-407 of the Code. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Very truly yours, JOHNSOPOPE, BOKOR, RU URNS, LLP /P E. D. Armstrong III EDA/js cc: Ms. Judy Hull Ed Mazur, P.E. #397105 v1 - LONG RANGE PLANNING .DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 February 21, 2006 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order for Case No. FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 2506 Countryside Boulevard Dear Mr. Johnson: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On September 29, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for (1) Flexible Standard Development to permit 240 attached dwellings (townhomes). in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 240 townhome lots (PLT2004-00017); and (3) Vacation of a utility easement. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Attached Dwelling criteria under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; 2. That Units 106 and 131 - 134 be limited to a six-foot by 10-foot, covered rear patio. Evidence of this restriction, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the six-foot high solid wall to the rear of Units 93 - 100 and to the rear of Units 110 - 153 be finished with stucco, be painted and be maintained by the homeowner's association; 4. That existing signs for the restaurant and the golf course adjacent to Countryside Boulevard be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR B111 JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOAN DORAN, COIINCII..%IJ:,%11 RK 1-IOYf HAN111:I0N, COUNCB.N11, B IT 0 CAIMEN A. PMERSEN, COUNCILMEM1liar February 21, 2006 Johnson - Page 2 5. That freestanding signage meet Code provisions, be monument-style and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the buildings; 6. That the easement be extended to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (suggested from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement); 7. That a note be placed on the Final Plat and within the Homeowners Association documents that the City of Clearwater's responsibility of the ditch along Countryside Boulevard will be for maintenance of flow only. All other maintenance, to include erosion, aesthetics, mowing and tree trimming, will be the sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground; 9. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the following be shown on revised civil plan drawings: a. Eliminate the connector drive between the ends of the "Y" at the north end of Dolcetto Road. Extend/lengthen the pavement northwest for Unit 180 to allow the trash truck adequate backup, but maintaining the 22-foot north setback (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on southeast side of driveway); b. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 21/35 across the street from Unit 180 and Note 1 below Section A-A; c. Extend/lengthen pavement to the end of Nebbiolo Road in front -of Unit 20 to have pavement for the roadway end at an angle, maintaining the 20-foot setback indicated (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on south side of driveway or slightly in front of Unit 19); d. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 18/35 across the street from Unit 17 and Note 2 to the right of Section A-A; and e. A dumpster enclosure, meeting City specifications and designed with exterior materials and colors of the principal buildings, be provided at the cabana/clubhouse, meeting a 25-foot front setback to Enterprise Road; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan (Plan) be provided to the Planning Department, prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This Plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts (ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems). Other data required on this Plan must show the tree's canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), tree barricade detail and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. The Plan must especially. address grade changes along the property lines adjacent to the residential uses to the west and the incorporation of existing trees into the top of bank of the retention ponds; and 11. That, prior to the issuance of building permits or the recording of the Final Plat, whichever occurs first, open space/recreation impact fees be paid. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above three conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received November 29, 2 005. February 21, 2006 Johnson - Page 3 Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within. one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (February 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, in accordance with Section 4-502.A, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by the applicant or a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The Community Development Board (CDB) would hear an appeal application. The appeal period for your case will expire on February 28, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727- 562-4504. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. * Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk, AI Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BOex Standard (FLS)IInactive or Finished Cases lCounttyside Blvd 2506 Costa Verde at Countryside (MDR) - Appro vedl Countryside 2506 FLS2005-08060.PLT2004-00017 Development Order.doc _ CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 ?'gTERtOPOST OFFICE Box 4748, &F.ARWAT R, FI.ORIDA 33758-4748 Ill MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH Mwru7 AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 'rELEPHONF. (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMI:N1' REVIEW February 13, 2007 2006 Mr. E. D. Armstrong III Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Amended Development Order for Case No. FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 2506 Countryside Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong Jelmser?: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On September 29, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for (1) Flexible Standard Development to permit 240 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 240 townhome lots (PLT2004-00017); and (3) Vacation of a utility easement. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Attached Dwelling criteria under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; 2. That Units 106 and 131 - 134 be limited to a six-foot by 10-foot, covered rear patio. Evidence of this restriction, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the six-foot high solid wall to the rear of Units 93 - 100 and to the rear of Units 110 - 153 be finished with stucco, be painted and be maintained by the homeowner's association; 4. That existing signs for the restaurant and the golf course adjacent to Countryside Boulevard be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; I'RANK I IIBBARU, MAYOR jtntn DO RAN, CUI:,\CIL\tIC:V?tI{ Ilc» -r ll:\.\iirizrv, Ccti nc:ii.\rn..\u;rR I3n.F Jo?scl?, Ccn ?ai.?ut;nstti+ ® Cm a:,\ A. PFI]:R.SEN, Ccx Ncn. F.\M1:.K "F01 ]AL t.,?ti FOra,ta, nwt? Arr11tMArm:. AcnO E.MPL(nHR" • • 61 February 13, 2007 Febmai7y 1?06 Armstrong johnse -Page 2 5. That freestanding signage meet Code provisions, be monument-style and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the buildings; 6. That the easement be extended to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (suggested from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement); 7. That a note be placed on the Final Plat and within the Homeowners Association documents that the City of Clearwater's responsibility of the ditch along Countryside Boulevard will be for maintenance of flow only. All other maintenance, to include erosion, aesthetics, mowing and tree trimming, will be the sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground; 9. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the following be shown on revised civil plan drawings: a. Eliminate the connector drive between the ends of the "Y" at the north end of Dolcetto Road. Extend/lengthen the pavement northwest for Unit 180 to allow the trash truck adequate backup, but maintaining the 22-foot north setback (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on southeast side of driveway); b. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 21/35 across the street from Unit 180 and Note 1 below Section A-A; c. Extend/lengthen pavement to the end of Nebbiolo Road in front of Unit 20 to have pavement for the roadway end at an angle, maintaining the 20-foot setback indicated (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on south side of driveway or slightly in front of Unit 19); d. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 18/35 across the street from Unit 17 and Note 2 to the right of Section A-A; and e. A dumpster enclosure, meeting City specifications and designed with exterior materials and colors of the principal buildings, be provided at the cabana/clubhouse, meeting a 25-foot front setback to Enterprise Road; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan (Plan) be provided to the Planning Department, prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This Plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts (ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems). Other data required on this Plan must show the tree's canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), tree barricade detail and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. The Plan must especially address grade changes along the property lines adjacent to the residential uses to the west and the incorporation of existing trees into the top of bank of the retention ponds; and 11. That, prior to the issuance of building permits or the recording of the Final Plat, whichever occurs first, open space/recreation impact fees be paid. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above three conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received November 29, 2005. 0 0 1 February 13, 2007 Febvaafy , Armstrong johnse - Page 3 Pursuant to Section 4-303, an 'application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (February 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two eee years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, in accordance with Section 4-502.A, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by the applicant or a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The Community Development Board (CDB) would hear an appeal application. The appeal period for your case will expire on February 28, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727- 562-4504. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. * Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael elk, P Planning Director S.IPlanning DepartmentlCD BTlex Standard (FLS)Unactive or Finished Cases I Countryside Blvd 2506 Costa Verde at Countryside (MDR) - Approved I Countryside 2506 FLS2005-08060. PLT2004-00017 Development Order Amended 2.13.07. doe ? Lltsr?n??r CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ATER?'' POST OFFICE BOX 4740, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 i?/'o L' MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVF,NUF, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW February 21, 2006 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order for Case No. FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 2506 Countryside Boulevard Dear Mr. Johnson: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On September 29, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for (1) Flexible Standard Development to permit 240 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 240 townhome lots (PLT2004-00017); and (3) Vacation of a utility easement. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Attached Dwelling criteria under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; 2. That Units 106 and 131 - 134 be limited to a six-foot by 10-foot, covered rear patio. Evidence of this restriction, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the six-foot high solid wall to the rear of Units 93 - 100 and to the rear of Units 110 - 153 be finished with stucco, be painted and be maintained by the homeowner's association; 4. That existing signs for the restaurant and the golf course adjacent to Countryside Boulevard be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; THANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILLJONSON, VICE-NLIYOR JOAN DORAN, COUNCILMEN11WR FIOYL HAN111.10N, COIINCILMEMBIT ® CARLEN A. Ili:ri RSEN, COUNCIL WN11WR "I;OUAL EMI)LOYMENT AND AIzI;IRMATiV1: ACTION EMPLOYEIz" February 21, 2006 Johnson - Page 2 5. That freestanding signage meet Code provisions, be monument-style and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the buildings; 6. That the easement be extended to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (suggested from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement); 7. That a note be placed on the Final Plat and within the Homeowners Association documents that the City of Clearwater's responsibility of the ditch along Countryside Boulevard will be for maintenance of flow only. All other maintenance, to include erosion, aesthetics, mowing and tree trimming, will be the sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association; 8.. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground; 9. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the following be shown on revised civil plan drawings: a. Eliminate the connector drive between the ends of the "Y" at the north end of Dolcetto Road. Extend/lengthen the pavement northwest for Unit 180 to allow the trash truck adequate backup, but maintaining the 22-foot north setback (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on southeast side of driveway); b. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 21/35 across the street from Unit 180 and Note 1 below Section A-A; c. Extend/lengthen pavement to the end of Nebbiolo Road in front of Unit 20 to have pavement for the roadway end at an angle, maintaining the 20-foot setback indicated (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on south side of driveway or slightly in front of Unit 19); d. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 18/35 across the street from Unit 17 and Note 2 to the right of Section A-A; and e. A dumpster enclosure, meeting City specifications and designed with exterior materials and colors of the principal buildings, be provided at the cabana/clubhouse, meeting a 25-foot front setback to Enterprise Road; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan (Plan) be provided to the Planning Department, prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This Plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts (ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems). Other data required on this Plan must show the tree's canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), tree barricade detail and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. The Plan must especially address grade changes along the property lines adjacent to the residential uses to the west and the incorporation of existing trees into the top of bank of the retention ponds; and 11. That, prior to the issuance of building permits or the recording of the Final Plat, whichever occurs first, open space/recreation impact fees be paid. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above three conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the site plan and application dated received November 29, 2005. February 21, 2006 Johnson - Page 3 Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (February 21, 2007). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. In addition, in accordance with Section 4-502.A, please be aware that an appeal of a Level One approval (Flexible Standard Development) may be initiated by the applicant or a property owner abutting the property (which is the subject of the approval) within seven days of the date the Development Order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The Community Development Board (CDB) would hear an appeal application. The appeal period for your case will expire on February 28, 2006. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727- 562-4504. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. * Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Michael Delk, Al Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BlFlex Standard (FLS)IInactive or Finished Casesl Countryside Blvd 2506 Costa Verde at Countryside (MDR) - ApprovedlCountryside 2506 FLS2005-08060.PL7-2004-00017 Development Order.doc Message • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 5:41 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 2506 Countryside Blvd. (FLS2005-08060) A courier just dropped off the landscape sheet you are missing. I will have our runner bring it over to you ASAP tomorrow a.m. Sorry for the delay. Have a good evening. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 2/17/2006 Message 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 5:24 PM To: 'Jayne E. Sears' Cc: Reynolds, Mike; Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Countryside Exec. - DVA2004-08005 Jayne - The case planner for this request is Mike Reynolds. With this email, I am including him so that he can answer your questions. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne; Clayton, Gina Cc: Tim A. Johnson; Judy Hull Subject: Countryside Exec. - DVA2004-08005 Regarding the amendment of the development agreement, we understand it is not necessary to attend DRC for this case tomorrow. I do have a question about resubmittal - I have a revised concept plan that has been revised as you requested below. Do I resubmit as normal by noon on 12/13/05? Also, what about notices? Do I pick up the signs when I come in for resubmittal? I'm full of questions. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 -----Original Message----- From: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com [mailto:Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 3:26 PM To: Tim A. Johnson Cc: jhull@beazer.com; sgamm@beazer.com; emazur@fldesign.com Subject: RE: BeazerCountrysideDevelopment Agreement (Amended)_v1.DOC I think it might be helpful to show to note on your plan that you will channelize that driveway (since it is your new required transportation mitigation solution.). 12/7/2005 0 0 ORIGINAL RECEIVED RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS NOV 2 g 2005 Costa Verde at Countryside FLS2005-08060 - 2506 Countryside Blvd. PLANNING DEPARTMENT GENERAL ENGINEERING: CITY OF CLEARWATER Comment No. 1: On the preliminary plat, Sheet 16 of 35, and all the appropriate sheets, move the proposed raw water easement to the south into the buffer off of lots 212 through 221. The above to be addressed prior to DO. Response No. 1: Comment No. 1: Response No. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL: Acknowledged. Please refer to the revised Sheet 16 of 35. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: Submit complete application for the vacation of the raw water line easement from Well #63 to Belcher Road. The application for partial vacation of the easement was submitted to Engineering (Don Melone) on 11/23/05. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Comment No. 1: All wetland and stormwater retention areas must be designated as common areas for maintenance purposes. Identify on plans as common areas and indicate specific maintenance responsibility to the future home owner association. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Please refer to revised Sheets 12 through 16. FIRE: Comment No. 1: Fire hydrant spacing is to be no more than 300' apart. Show on plans PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Please refer to revised utility plans Comment No. 2: Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any r i building construction being started. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Fire Chief Rieckert has agreed that water system construction may be phased to allow construction of a Model Area. Specific location of Model Area and extent of water system required to serve it will be shown on Construction Plans to be submitted prior to a building permit. Comment No. 3: Response No. 3: HARBOR MASTER: No issues. LEGAL: No issues. LAND RESOURCES: It appears that all townhouses are to be 2 story. If there are to be any townhouses of 3 or more stories they will have to be provided with fire sprinkler systems. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Acknowledged. All townhomes will be two (2) stories. ORIGINAL RECEIVED No response required. No response required. Nov 2,9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CIN OF CLEARWATER Comment No. 1: 8/1/05 - Insure that all proposed grades do not change too drastically at trees to be preserved. A thorough review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. 9/26/05 - The berm section A-A reflects a 4" high berm starting at the property line. This would conceivably bury every tree between the property line and the building foundation. This is why a thorough review must be performed at each tree to be preserved. Provide PRIOR TO DO. Response No. 1: On Monday, November 14, 2003, Pat Roberson, Roberson Resource Group, and Jon Burr, Florida Design Consultants, Inc., met with Rick Albee. They discussed what steps had been taken to preserve trees, what constraints the existing site, utility and other regulations placed on tree preservation and what we would do to address the concerns of the City, prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 2: 8/1/05 - It appears that some trees can be incorporated into the TOB of the retention ponds. Insure that proposed grades incorporate the trees critical root zones. Also insure that the proposed swales and berms do not impact the trees critical root zones. 9/26105 - It still appears that 2 • 0 some trees designated to be preserved have several grade changes. The pond contours do not incorporate the trees critical root zones. A thorough review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. Revise PRIOR TO DO. Response No. 2: Please see response 1 above. Comment No. 3: Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e., crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to Build Permit. Response No. 3: A Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist will be submitted to the City. The construction plans will clearly reference the Tree Preservation Plan. The Tree Preservation Plan will not show proposed landscaping for clarity. LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: Sheet LA3 - Part of fence setback adjacent to Laurelwood Drive on the left hand side is missing. Revise. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Please refer to the revised Sheet LA3. Comment No. 2: Sheet 34A/35 indicates that the "typical type 1 type curb section" are shown on the paving, grading and drainage sheets. Only Sheets 18 and 22 indicate the Type 1 curbing ORIGINAL locations. Unclear why other portions of roadways, RECEIVED especially adjacent to proposed ponds and wetlands are NOV 2 9 2005 also not indicated for type 1 curbing. The "Typical Double 60" RCP Culvert Crossing Section" on Sheet 34A indicates PLANNING DEPARTMENT type 1 curbing, yet is not shown on Sheet 19. It, however, CITY OF CLEARWATER appears that the type 1 curbing is shown on Sheets 7-11. Remove type 1 curbing from driveway area for Lot 131 (Sheet 10). Response No. 2: Plans have been revised. Both the Site Plan (Sheets 7 thru 11) and the Paving & Drainage Sheets (sheets 18 thru 22) show the 3 extent of Type 1 curbing. Lot 131 has been corrected so that Type 1 curb ends prior to the driveway. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: 9/16/05 - Site data table has been corrected to show wetland sq. ft. and acreage. Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at (727) 562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Note: Site table needs to be corrected to show wetland sq. ft. and/or acres. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Recreation impact fees will be paid prior to the issuance of Building permit, or final plat, whichever occurs first. STORMWATER: Comment No. 1: Provide a berm along Countryside Boulevard adequate for City of Clearwater to perform maintenance along the ditch (minimum 10 feet), ensure that berm is incorporated within the easement. Response No. 1: This comment has been superseded. Please refer to e-mail from D. Scott Rice, P.E., dated 10/04/05, copy enclosed. Comment No. 2: Extend the easement to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (Suggest from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement). Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Please refer to revised plans. CoaraNo. 3: It is the City of Clearwater belief that the pipe along RECEIVED Countryside Boulevard may be increased in diameter to meet allow for 10-year peak flow. Please ensure that Nov 2,9 2005 development's internal culverts and piping would be sized sufficiently to allow for an increase in flow as a result of PLANNING DEPARTMENT replacing the upstream pipes without causing impacts. CITY OF CLEARWATER Response No. 3: Acknowledged,. The ditch/culvert system is sufficient to handle the flow from this pipe in Countryside Boulevard. The flow from this area gets to the ditch regardless of the pipe size (via curb, 4 roadway, etc.), so increasing the pipe size will not significantly increase the flow. Comment No. 4: Note on Plat and within Homeowners Association Documents that the City of Clearwater's responsibility of the ditch along Countryside Boulevard will be for maintenance of flow only. All other maintenance to include erosion, aesthetics, mowing, and tree trimming will be the sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association. (This comment added on 10/03/05). Response No. 4: Acknowledged. The final plat will contain the requested wording regarding maintenance responsibilities. All of the above prior to DO. SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: 9/26/05 - TJG Black barrel service utilizes right side pickup. Provide cul- de-sac turnarounds on the east end of Sienna Road to pick up Lots 57-62, the north end of Dolcetto Road to pick up Lots 175-180 (rather than the "Y's" shown) and to pick up Lots 17-20 on Nebbiolo Road on the west side of the development. With the Y's the driver will have to back down the street to service these lots, which increases the risk of accidents. 9/14/05 - TJG Turnarounds at end of Sienna and Dolcetto Roads. Response No. 1: Turnarounds (adequate for Solid Waste trucks) have been added at the end of Sienna and Dolcetto Roads, as requested by Solid Waste. Additionally, concrete pads have been added (See Sheet 8, for Lots 17-20 and Sheet 21, for Lots 178-180) for solid waste staging on pick-up days. Comment No. 2: The solid waste and recycling service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - (727) 562-4930. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5 CITY OF CLEARWATER • TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: No issues conditions. 0 Applicant has addressed prior traffic Response No. 1: No response required. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: 9/25/05 - WW Typical building layout provided on Sheet 7. Provide the information requested under 7/27/05 comment, including the minimum front setback from the unit property line. 7/27/05 - WW As part of the Site Plan package of Sheets 1-35 of 35, provide a typical building layout of the two building types (Venetian Bay and Bloomingdale), the same as has been done under the Landscape Plan typicals on Sheets LA-1 and LA-2, providing the width of the driveways (single-wide and double-side), the dimensions of units, providing the square footage of the unit types, the location and dimensions of any stoops and patios in the front or rear of the units, indicating whether any of these stoops or patios will be covered (or have the options of being covered by the unit purchaser), showing unit sidewalks, indicating the location, type and height of any unit fencing along unit property lines, indicating whether there are any accessory uses allowable for units (such as sheds, pools, spas, screen rooms, etc. - including where (setbacks) from unit lot lines such may be placed, showing all roof overhangs by dashed lines (with dimensions of length/width of overhand), showing all second floor balconies (if any), etc. 11/21/04 - WW Stoops and patios at the rear of units are structures by the Code and must meet setback requirements. Show all stoops and patios on all appropriate plans, including the dimension to the existing, outside property lines. If any patios are to be covered, indicate such. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2005 6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Please refer to the revised plan Sheet 7 of 35. Additionally, the front setback is 20 feet from the back of the sidewalk, please refer to typical section on Sheet 34A of 35. Comment No. 2: 9125/05 and 7/27/05 and 11/21/04 - WW Address signage for development, by showing the location of freestanding sign(s), the setbacks from property lines, the relationship to sight visibility triangles and the relationship to landscaping. Provide a typical (general) front elevation with dimensions (width, length and height) and proposed sign colors. Note: The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available for residential projects. Need to meet general code requirements. Note: Any signs to be placed within easements will need to be approved by Engineering. Response No. 2: The revised plans (refer to Site Plan) show the approximate location and number of free standing signs (one at each entrance from a public road). The signs will be outside the sight visibility triangles. Other more detailed information (i.e. setbacks, front elevations with dimensions, colors, etc. will be submitted as part of a sign permit package, prior to construction of any signs. Comment No. 3: 9125/05 - WW Place underground the existing overhead electric line for the street lights along the frontage of Enterprise Road and at the intersection of Enterprise Road and Countryside Blvd. Response No. 3: The Applicant respectfully declines to underground the existing overhead electric lines. 7/27/05 and 11121/04 - WW Per Section 3-1908.A, the City may require the undergrounding of existing above ground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way. Due to the frontage of this project along Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road, underground these facilities. ORIGINAL Comment No. 4: 9125/05 - WW RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2005 7 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • Any approval of this proposal will be conditioned on the approval of the vacation by City Council prior to the issuance of tiny permits. Response No. 4: Acknowledged. 7/24/05 - WW Need to submit a complete application for the vacation of the water line easement to the Engineering Department prior to scheduling this request for CDB. Comment No. 5: 9/25/05 and 7/24/05 - WW Sheet 22/35 - Indicate the landscape buffer on Sections G- G and H-H (like Section A-A on Sheet 18/35). Response No. 5: Acknowledged. The sections on Sheet 22 have been revised as requested. Comment No. 6: Sheets 12-16/35 - Preliminary Plat - provide the lot area for each lot (either in tabular form or on each lot). Response No. 6: Acknowledged. The lot area for each lot has been added to the plans. Please refer to Preliminary Plat Sheets. Comment No. 7: Sheet 9 - Unit 106 is indicated a 20-foot rear setback. Will Unit 106 be limited to a maximum 6'x 10' patio/patio cover? If so, how will this Unit 106 be so restricted? Sheet 10 - Units 131-134 are only indicated a 6' x 10' patio/patio cover. Same comment as above. Response No. 7: The restrictions are noted on the Site Plan (Sheet 7) unit restrictions, where needed, shall be enforced by the Condominium Association documents. Comment No. 8: Existing signs indicated on Sheet 3 adjacent to Countryside Blvd. for the restaurant and the golf course must be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Response No. 8: Acknowledged. The signs will be removed prior to the first C.O. This is noted on Sheet 19 of 35. Comment No. 9: Based on the building elevations submitted September 21, ('ORIGINAL 2005, revise the Land Use Data Note #5 on Sheet 1 to RECEIVED indicate the height of the Venetian Bay Product at 23'-3" (midpoint of the pitched roof) and the height of the NOV 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER Bloomingdale Product at 24'-6 5/8" (midpoint of the pitched roof) Also revise Note #5 to indicate the Venetian Bay Product to be on the southern half of site, and the Bloomingdale Product to be on the northern half of the site. Response No. 9: Acknowledged. Note #5 of the Land Use Data has been revised, as requested. Comment No. 10: Land Use Plan Amendment must be approved prior to approval of this Flexible Standard request. Response No. 10: Acknowledged. Comment No. 11: There is an existing PSTA bus stop on Countryside Blvd. right where Nebbiolo Road is proposed. What discussions have you had with PSTA regarding the relocation of this bus stop? Response No. 11: Acknowledged. A letter has been sent to PSTA advising that agency of the proposed development and the need to relocate the PSTA bus stop sign and bench, to the west. Copy of the letter to PSTA is enclosed. No comments have been received from PSTA, as of this date. OTHER: No Comments 11/29/2005 1:55 PM 45403.108701 #356751 v1 - ENCHANTMENT/Response to Comments (FLS2005-08060) :pcm K:\Costa Verde at Countryside\Misc\Comment-Response to Sears.DOC ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 9 --- r O Cabrera Fwd: FL82005-08060 - 2506 Coun Ask- e?Blvd. Page 1 From: Ed Mazur To: ocabrera@fldesign.com Date: 11/29/2005 7:47:57 AM Subject: Fwd: FLS2005-08060 - 2506 Countryside Blvd. >>> <Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com> 10/04 9:52 AM >>> Ed, Due to the existence of the row of pine trees along the ditch adjacent Countryside Blvd., the Stormwater comments have been revised as follows: 1. Provide a berm along Countryside Boulevard adequate for City of Clearwater to perform maintenance along the ditch (minimum 10 feet), ensure that berm is incorporated within the easement. (10/3/04 - comment superceded) 2. Extend the easement to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (Suggest from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement). 3. It is the City of Clearwater belief that the pipe along Countryside Boulevard may be increased in diameter to meet allow for 10-year peak flow. Please ensure that development's internal culverts and piping would be sized sufficiently to allow for a an increase in flow as a result of replacing the upstream pipes without causing impacts. 4. Note on Plat and within Homeowners Association Documents that the City of Clearwater's responsibility of the ditch along Countryside Boulevard will be for maintenance of flow only. All other maintenance to include erosion, aesthetics, mowing, and tree trimming will the be sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association. (this comment added on 10/3/05) All of the above prior to DO. Let me know if you have any questions. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice(a)MyClearwater.com ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC. Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 October 21, 2005 Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority (PSTA) 14840 49th Street North Clearwater, FL 33762-2893 RE: Costa Verde, City of Clearwater File: 0282-000240.01 Gentlemen: Our client Beazer Homes is proposing a re-development of the existing Countryside Executive Golf Course. The new project, Costa Verde Townhomes, proposes 240 townhome units to be constructed on approximately 44 acres at the northwest corner of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road. There is an existing bus stop along westbound Countryside Boulevard, roughly a t/ mile west of Enterprise Road. The location of the existing bus stop conflicts with the proposed intersection of Nebbiolo Road with Countryside Boulevard. We are suggesting that the existing bus stop sign and bench be relocated to the west of the proposed street (as shown on the attached sketch). Please let us know if this meets with your approval. Sincerely, ? WJ0---- Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Sr. Project Manager ORIGINAL Enclosures RECEIVED C: File: 282-02-40.01 NOV 2 9 2005 jmr. KACosta Verde at Countryside\Letters\PSTA-Bus Stop.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com ORIGINAL JJ O 10 20 40 RECEIVED Q / 2 9 2005 DEPARTME __,PLAN ING :LEARWA t) CI F r F' 8„ EXISTING BUS ` STOP SIGN C-) ! '?J 9 U I ? E i o 04 {rr??.- U r• 0 4 a ti,/} ? L9 N r -? a' N X / W DESCRIPTION, PSTA - BUS STOP EXHIBIT PROJECT No. EPN, 282-02 169 0 i DATE FIGURE, FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 10/20/05 Y ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BYE 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Port Richey FL 34655 Tel. (727) 849-7588 - Fax, (727) 848-3648 JMS ©Copyright 2005 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission. 2,82-? Oa-- 4 a,o1 ®RORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. , 1 £ U 1 r ? W\ 1 j 1 tP - ? ? _ t , 3 C' a i<. 1 .r n COSTA VERDE ORIGINAL (fka Countryside Executive Golf Course) RECEIVED Aerial view of project site NOV 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS Costa Verde at Countryside PLT2004-00017 - 2506 Countryside Blvd. GENERAL ENGINEERING: . The following to be addressed on the final plat: Comment No. 1: Need a letter from the postmaster approving the proposed private street names prior to final plat submittal. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Copy of the letter is enclosed. Comment No. 2: Sidewalk easements will be required for all proposed sidewalk segments that meander out of the proposed ingress/egress easement. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Comment No. 3: Private drainage easements required for all storm mains outside the ingress/egress easement. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. Comment No. 4: Grant an additional easement for the existing 6" force main if force main meanders outside the existing 10 ft. drainage and utility easement. Response No. 4: During construction, the location of the existing 6" force main will be verified. If found to meander outside the existing 10 ft. drainage and utility easement, either the force main will be relocated or additional easement recorded. Comment No. 5: Provide utility easement(s) for sanitary sewers or water lines not in common area or ingress/egress easement. Response No. 5: Acknowledged. ENVIRONMENTAL: Final plat to be recorded with Pinellas County prior to building permit. Comment No. 1: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Response No. 1: Please refer to response under FLS 2005-08060. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FIRE: Comment No. 1: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Response No. 1: Please refer to response under FLS 2005-08060. HARBOR MASTER: Comment No. 1: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Response No. 1: Please refer to response under FLS 2005-08060. LEGAL: Comment No. 1: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Response No. 1: Please refer to response under FLS 2005-08060. LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Response No. 1: Please refer to response under FLS 2005-08060. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to final plat. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Deb Richter at (727) 562- 4817 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. The fees will be paid, prior to Final Plat STORMWATER: Comment No. 1: Response No. 1 See comments under FLS2005-08060. Please refer to responses under FLS 2005-08060 2 ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Response No. 1: Please refer to responses under FLS 2005-08060. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Applicant to address comments of FLS2005-08060. Response No. 1: Please refer to responses under FLS 2005-08060. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: See conditions under FLS2005-08060. Response No. 1: Please refer to responses under FLS 2005-08060. OTHER: No Comments 11/29/2005 1:48 PM 45403.108701 #356735 v1 - ENCHANTMENT/Response to Comments (PLT2004-00017) :pcm K:\Costa Verde at Countryside\Misc\Comments-Response to Sears.01.DOC ORIGINAL RECEIVED Nov 2 D 2005 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER POSTMASTER CLEARWATER FLORIDA UNl TED STATES J POSTAL SERVICE October 26, 2005 EDWARD MAZUR JR PE FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS INC 3030 STARKEY BLVD NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34655-2175 Subject: Costa Verde (fka Countryside Executive Golf Course) Dear Mr. Mazur: This will have reference to your letter dated October 24, 2005, requesting approval of the following proposed street names in Clearwater. Please be advised we have no objection to the following eight street names: Nebbiolo Road Sangiovese Road Trebbiano Road Sienna Road Malvasia Road Prosecco Road Corvina Road Dolcetto Road Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Dave Bauer, Address Management Systems Clerk, at 727 447-7166. Sincerely, Diane C. Sharp A a--)- Postmaster Clearwater, FL 33758-9998 cc: Dave Bauer, AMS Clerk ORIGINAL RECEIVED PO BOX 9998 CLEARWATER FL 33758-9998 727 464-2906 FAX: 727 464-2951 NOV 2 9 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER '4 h, essage ! • Page 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:46 AM To: 'Tim A. Johnson' Cc: Wells, Wayne; jhull@beazer.com; sgamm@beazer.com; Jayne E. Sears Subject: RE: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 The DVA is being processed and it is not contingent on the State's approval. -----Original Message----- From: Tim A. Johnson [mailto:TimJ@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:56 AM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Wells, Wayne; jhull@beazer.com; sgamm@beazer.com; Jayne E. Sears Subject: FW: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 I see no reason why the Development Agreement amendment cannot be processed ASAP. Its approval is not contingent on the State's approval of the land use change. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel and Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: 727-461-1818 Facsimile: 727-462-0365 timj@jpfirm Qom The information contained in this transmission may be attorney/client privileged and therefore confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient , you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named above, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney/client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at 727-461-1818 or e-mail. Thank you. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 6:37 AM To: Tim A. Johnson; 'Ed Mazur'; '0 Cabrera' Subject: FW: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 11/21/2005 •? Message • • Page 2 of 3 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 6:43 PM To: Jayne E. Sears Cc: michael.delk@MyClearwater.com; Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com; neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 Jayne - First, I am not aware of any changes to the plans (none have been resubmitted) nor have I received any additional "comments" from other departments based on any changed plans, other than those comments presented at the DRC meeting. Second, there may be additional comments based on revised plans that you intend to submit in response to the comments at the DRC meeting. Third, it is my understanding that the land use change has yet to be approved due to issues regarding roadway impacts and that there has been a revised Development Agreement submitted for Staff review prior to scheduling for a recommendation by the CDB prior to approval by City Council (I am not aware of when the revised Development Agreement is to be presented to the CDB and City Council). In discussing this with Gina Clayton, the State may respond by mid-December regarding the land use change and the roadway impacts. Fourth, the FLS and Preliminary Plat cases should not be approved and a Development Order issued until the land use change is approved by the State, which should not be approved until the Development Agreement is approved by City Council. Fifth, the Final Plat cannot be approved by City Council until the FLS, Preliminary Plat and Development Agreement cases are approved and Development Orders issued. So...it appears that the ducks are not in the proper order at this point. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:05 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 Wayne, we are working on responses to comments and resubmittal of the referenced case, which we expect to submit within the next few days. Florida Design Consultants has been working with staff on various issues, such as the garbage truck turn-arounds, and we have reason to believe that there may be "updated" or "additional" (yikes, hate to say that) comments. If so, please send me the revised comments ASAP so we can include responses in our resubmittal. Everthing's heating up because they need to get the plat set for hearing. Thanks Wayne. Hope you're doing okay. Jayne E. Sears 11/21/2005 Message • ? Page 3 of 3 Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE To the extent this email contains federal tax advice, such advice was not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like us to prepare written tax advice designed to provide penalty protection, please contact us and we will be happy to discuss the matter with you in more detail. IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE To the extent this email contains federal tax advice, such advice was not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like us to prepare written tax advice designed to provide penalty protection, please contact us and we will be happy to discuss the matter with you in more detail. 11/21/2005 Mt??sage • • Page 1 of 3 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 8:27 AM To: 'Tim A. Johnson' Cc: Brown, Steven; Delk, Michael; Clayton, Gina; Reynolds, Mike Subject: RE: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 I might agree with you, but I am not processing the Development Agreement. Mike Reynolds is the case planner and by letter to you dated November 8th there is a schedule for review of the Development Agreement (Dec. 8, 2005 - DRC; Jan. 17, 2006 - CDB; February 16 and March 2, 2006 - City Council). -----Original Message----- From: Tim A. Johnson [mailto:TimJ@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 7:56 AM To: Clayton, Gina Cc: Wells, Wayne; jhull@beazer.com; sgamm@beazer.com; Jayne E. Sears Subject: FW: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 I see no reason why the Development Agreement amendment cannot be processed ASAP. Its approval is not contingent on the State's approval of the land use change. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel and Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: 727-461-1818 Facsimile: 727-462-0365 timi@jpfirm com. The information contained in this transmission may be attorney/client privileged and therefore confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient , you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named above, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney/client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at 727-461-1818 or e-mail. Thank you. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 6:37 AM 11/21/2005 Mi sage • • Page 2 of 3 J', To: Tim A. Johnson; 'Ed Mazur'; 'O Cabrera' Subject: FW: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 6:43 PM To: Jayne E. Sears Cc: michael.delk@MyClearwater.com; Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com; neil.thompson@MyClearwater.com Subject: RE: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 Jayne - First, I am not aware of any changes to the plans (none have been resubmitted) nor have I received any additional "comments" from other departments based on any changed plans, other than those comments presented at the DRC meeting. Second, there may be additional comments based on revised plans that you intend to submit in response to the comments at the DRC meeting. Third, it is my understanding that the land use change has yet to be approved due to issues regarding roadway impacts and that there has been a revised Development Agreement submitted for Staff review prior to scheduling for a recommendation by the CDB prior to approval by City Council (I am not aware of when the revised Development Agreement is to be presented to the CDB and City Council). In discussing this with Gina Clayton, the State may respond by mid-December regarding the land use change and the roadway impacts. Fourth, the FLS and Preliminary Plat cases should not be approved and a Development Order issued until the land use change is approved by the State, which should not be approved until the Development Agreement is approved by City Council. Fifth, the Final Plat cannot be approved by City Council until the FLS, Preliminary Plat and Development Agreement cases are approved and Development Orders issued. So...it appears that the ducks are not in the proper order at this point Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jayne E. Sears [mailto:JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:05 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 Wayne, we are working on responses to comments and resubmittal of the referenced case, which we expect to submit within the next few days. Florida Design Consultants has been working with staff on various issues, such as the garbage truck turn-arounds, and we have reason to believe that there may be "updated" or "additional" (yikes, hate to say that) comments. If so, please send me the revised comments ASAP so we can include responses in our resubmittal. Everthing's heating up because they need to get the plat set for hearing. Thanks Wayne. Hope you're doing okay. 11/21/2005 1 ssage 0 • Page 3 of 3 Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE To the extent this email contains federal tax advice, such advice was not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like us to prepare written tax advice designed to provide penalty protection, please contact us and we will be happy to discuss the matter with you in more detail. IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE To the extent this email contains federal tax advice, such advice was not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like us to prepare written tax advice designed to provide penalty protection, please contact us and we will be happy to discuss the matter with you in more detail. 11/21/2005 Message Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:05 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 2506 Countryside Blvd. - FLS2005-08060 Wayne, we are working on responses to comments and resubmittal of the referenced case, which we expect to submit within the next few days. Florida Design Consultants has been working with staff on various issues, such as the garbage truck turn- arounds, and we have reason to believe that there may be "updated" or "additional" (yikes, hate to say that) comments. If so, please send me the revised comments ASAP so we can include responses in our resubmittal. Everthing's heating up because they need to get the plat set for hearing. Thanks Wayne. Hope you're doing okay. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE To the extent this email contains federal tax advice, such advice was not intended to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. If you would like us to prepare written tax advice designed to provide penalty protection, please contact us and we will be happy to discuss the matter with you in more detail. 12/16/2005 Message • . Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:32 AM To: 'Tim A. Johnson' Subject: RE: Beazer/C'side - Renderings Cad drawings are acceptable (these are assumed to be black and white building elevation drawings - all four sides of the two building types). The elevations need to include the proposed height dimension (to midpoint of a pitched roof) and the exterior materials and colors indicated (written notes on the elevations). Color samples/chips may be submitted to indicate the actual exterior colors. -----Original Message----- From: Tim A. Johnson [mailto:Timl@jpfirm.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 9:03 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Beazer/C'side - Renderings Can these be submitted as cad drawings rather than artists renderings? Cad drawings are absolutely accurate, not to mention substantially less expensive. Please advise. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel and Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: 727-461-1818 Facsimile: 727-462-0365 tim0&firm.com The information contained in this transmission may be attorney/client privileged and therefore confidential. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient , you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, printing or copy of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, or if you are not the individual or entity named above, the receipt of this transmission is not intended to and does not waive any privilege, attorney/client or otherwise. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by telephone at 727-461-1818 or e-mail. Thank you. 11/1/2005 L -A Wells, Wayne From: Cyndi Tarapani [ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 3:00 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: Re: FLD2004-11077, 2506 Countryside Blvd. Wayne-thanks for your timely response-we're on the path to resubmit tomorrow as a Flexible Standard application. Thanks again. Cyndi Tarapani Florida Design Consultants 727-849-7588 ctarapani@fldesign.com >>> <Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com> 8/10/2005 2:57:23 PM >>> Cyndi - Based on the fax you sent me regarding the location of the four-foot high fence/wall, the proposed locations and length of fence along the north and west property lines is acceptable. Along the west property line of Belcher Road, it is suggested to work the fence/wall into the buffer area rather than being adjacent to the internal roadway, so that landscaping can be placed on the inside of the fence/wall for the residents enjoyment also. Wayne 4_- N 0 0 Wells,, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 6:24 PM To: 'Cyndi Tarapani' Cc: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: RE: Signs for Countryside Executive Golf Course Cyndi The comment in the draft DRC comments is: "Address signage for development, by showing the location of freestanding sign(s), the setbacks from property lines, the relationship to sight visibility triangles and the relationship to landscaping. Provide a typical (general) front elevation with dimensions (width, length and height) and proposed sign colors. Note: The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available for residential projects. Need to meet general code requirements." The primary site development issue related to the signage is the first part of the comment, that being the location of the sign(s), the setback from property lines and the sign(s) relationship to sight visibility triangles and landscaping. Signage many times is the last thing designed, which then many times does not relate to the landscaping that has been designed. We want the signage designed (as delineated above) as part of this proposal, not as an afterthought later requiring changes to that already reviewed and approved. The second sentence we can delete. I would agree with you that the actual, detailed design of signage will be'done at a later date and will need to meet Code provisions when submitted. Since the Comprehensive Sign Program is not available, the "master plan" for signage will need to meet the general Sign Code provisions. Hope this helps. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Cyndi Tarapani (mailto:ctarapani@fldesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:21 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ed Mazur; JayrneS@jpfirm.com Subject: Signs for Countryside Executive Golf Course Wayne-I am writing regarding the pending Flexible Standard application for Countryside Executive Golf Course, FLS 2005-08060. This case is scheduled for the DRC tomorrow and we received your comments yesterday. The specific comment of concern is comment #3 under Planning regarding the project signage. As is typical of this size project, the developer is not able now to design the signs but of course will submit a master plan of signage and go through the appropriate review necessary at a later date. As you and I know, this process of submitting later for signage has been done on many occasions for a variety of projects. We acknowledge that we must meet the City code when the sign plan is submitted. Please confirm that this treatment will be acceptable. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Vice President, Planning Florida Design Consultants :ti 727-849-7588 ctarapani@fldesign.com L? LJ Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 5:03 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017, 2506 Countryside Boulevard Jayne - Attached are the draft DRC comments for the September 29, 2005, DRC meeting, scheduled for 11:10 am. Wayne rt, draft 9.29.05 dre action agend.,. LL CITY OF CLEO-RWATER ° Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W. MY C LE AR W ATER. C OM September 07, 2005 Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757-1368 RE: FLS2005-08060 -- 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-08060. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September 29, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, [V?7 Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLS2005-08060 - 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 1:29 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Blvd. Jayne - Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. I will send the original to you. Based on our discussion this morning, I assume that you will be sending me two copies of the Existing Tree - Proposed Development Analysis plans as previously requested (since now you have seen what I was requesting). Additionally, as part of the sufficiency review, I will be requesting the building elevation drawings for the different building types (all sides of the buildings, including height dimensions, colors [with color samples/chips] and materials). Wayne letter of )mpleteness 9.7.05.. JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR. SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON LEANNE LETIZE ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. AUDREY B. RAUCHWAY DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS PHILIP M. SHASTEEN JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 45403.108701 September 7, 2005 Via Hand Deliverv Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Dept. 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 F1 1 P P, SFP 0 7 2005' ' i Re: FLS2005-08060 PLT2005-00017 2506 Countryside Boulevard Dear Wayne: On behalf of the applicant, Beazer Homes, we respond to your letter of incompleteness, dated September 5, 2005, as follows: 1. The survey submitted with Case No. FLD2004-11017 is still valid and is intended to be carried over into the referenced case. 2. Enclosed are two additional copies of the Existing Tree - Proposed Development Analysis Plan as you requested. 3. Enclosed are three copies of an updated Drainage Report for Costa Verde at Countryside, dated August, 2005. 4. The traffic study prepared by Florida Design Consultants, Inc., dated June 28, 2005 ("Traffic Study") in still valid and we ask that it be incorporated into the referenced case. Based on the Traffic Study, the developer is required to construct certain improvements set forth in the Development Agreement, dated May 31, 2005, between Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc. and the City ("Development Agreement"). CLEARWATER OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST. 403 EAST MADISON STREET POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) SUITE 400 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756-5643 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1100) TELEPHONE: (727) 461-1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (813) 223-7118 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III September 7, 2005 Page 2 5. Although building elevations are not required for Level 1 review, we enclose for your information 5 color copies of the building elevations attached to the Development Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement, the architectural style of the townhomes to be constructed on the Property shall be substantially as shown on these elevations. As to dimensional information, Sheet 7 of 35 of the site plan provides scaled drawings of the product lay-out, including driveways, and the building height is limited to 35 feet by the terms of the Development Agreement. We understand that this case is being scheduled for the September 29, 2005 DRC meeting. If you require any additional information, please contact my legal assistant, Jayne Sears, or me. Very truly your SF_P 0 ' 7 2005 Timothy A. Johnson, Jr. i. i. TAJ/js encls. cc: Mr. Steven Gamm Ms. Judy Hull Florida Design Consultants, Inc. C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 rl?1v?+' ?if1?V MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, IOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 5, 2005 Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 Re: FLS2005-08060/PLT2005-00017, 2506 Countryside Boulevard Dear Mr. Johnson: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-08060/PLT2005-00017. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments: J 1. Is it assumed that the survey received July 1, 2005, under Case No. FLD2004-11017 is still valid and is intended to be carried over into this FLS case? Provide two additional copies of the Existing Tree - Proposed Development Analysis Plan. 3. Is it assumed that the Drainage Report, dated July 8, 2005, submitted under Case No. FLD2004-11017 is still valid as previously signed and sealed and is intended to be carried over into this FLS case? 4. Is it assumed that the Traffic Study, dated June 28, 2005, submitted under Case No. FLD2004-11017 is still valid as previously signed and sealed and is intended to be carried over into this FLS case? Provide building elevation drawings for the different building types (all sides of the buildings, including height dimensions, colors and materials). Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by 9:00 am on Wednesday, September 7, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, G? h W LQL Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)IPending CaseslI - IncompletelCountryside Blvd 2506 Costa Verde at Countryside (MDR) - WMLetter of Incompleteness 9.5.05.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COL. Ncti N1r::aBr=R HoYr HAM1I:10N, COLiNCII N1FM13FR CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCII\1EMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND APFIRMATIVI? ACTION EMPLOYI`R" 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 10:14 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Cc: Cyndi Tarapani (E-mail) Subject: FLS2005-08060/PLT2005-00017, 2506 Countryside Blvd Jayne - Attached is a Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. I will send the original to you. Wayne Letter of completeness 9.5.0 a 0 RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS BEAZER HOMES CORP. FLD2004-11017 - 2506 Countryside Blvd. ORIGINAL GENERAL ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Submit complete application for the vacation of the raw water line easement from Well #63 to Belcher Road. Response No. 1: Based on comments received at the DRC meeting we have revised the areas of the existing easement that formerly were to be vacated. A complete application for the vacation of the well water line easement will be submitted shortly. Comment No. 2: Other than required 90-degree crossings, relocate proposed utilities outside the drainage easement of Curlew Creek (see Stormwater Comment #2). Response No. 2: Utilities have been relocated outside the drainage easement of Curlew Creek. Please see Sheets 19 and 26. Comment No. 3: Provide a utility easement between Well #63 and Belcher Road for the potential future construction of a raw water line. Response No. 3: Please see Sheets 10 and 11 for the location of a new raw water line easement to replace the portions of the existing easement to be vacated. Formal dedication will take place with the plat recordation. Comment No. 4: Identify the location, number and status of all raw water wells on all plans. Response No. 4: The number and status of all raw water wells is now shown on the plans. Comment No. 5: How will solid waste service be provided for the proposed club house? Response No. 5: Solid waste service for the clubhouse will be via a dumpster. The location of the dumpster, and appropriate details, have been added to the plans. R C" E VED ?? 4116 103 2005 p j%jt4G DEPARIA tAl C1W OF CIEARW ORIGINAL Comment No. 6: Label all existing, adjoining roads on all plans (i.e. Sheets 7, 9, 18 - 20, and 25 - 27). Response No. 6: All existing and adjoining roads are now labeled on all plan sheets. Comment No. 7: Relocate the proposed sanitary sewer line in the rear of lots 7 through 19 to within the common area or dedicate a sanitary sewer easement. Response No. 7: A sanitary sewer easement will be dedicated for this proposed sanitary sewer via the recorded plat. The proposed easement location is shown on Sheet 25. NOTE: Additional comments may be necessary based on the responses to conditions. Prior to building permit, the following issues must be resolved. Comment No. 1: The applicant will be responsible for the expense to connect proposed gravity sewer main to existing sanitary sewer Lift Station #41. Response No. 1: The applicant is aware that it will be responsible for the expense to connect to Lift Station #41. Comment No. 2: Provide construction notes for all proposed potable water and sanitary sewer mains on the utility plans. Response No. 2: Construction notes for all utilities, roadways, etc., will be added to the plans prior to resubmitting these documents for a building permit. Comment No. 3: Label proposed sanitary sewer structure #1 as a doghouse manhole. Response No. 3: Due to the fact that this connection will be made to an 8" sanitary sewer that will not be in service at the time of construction, it is our understanding that`a doghouse manhole will not be required at this location. 4-Ift X313 dO u13 1N3W1MM E)m[awd 9061 R I MY 2 ?? ORIGIN AL Comment No. 4: All F.H.A.'s installed greater than 10 ft. from a water main shall be constructed with ductile iron pipe and shall have a gate valve at the tee on the branch line and at the F.H.A. Response No. 4: A note has been added to all of the utility sheets stating this requirement. Comment No. 5: Proposed water taps to be provided by the city. All applicable fees to be paid for by applicant. Response No. 5: Notes have been added to all locations where the proposed system must tap to the existing system indicating that the tap will be made by the City of Clearwater, but paid for by the contractor. Comment No. 6: Proposed doghouse manhole shall have a poured in place or precast slab placed beneath the main prior to setting the barrel section. Response No. 6: Please see the response to No. 3 above. Comment No. 7: Revise sanitary sewer cleanout detail to current City Standard. Response No. 7: The sanitary sewer cleanout has been revised to City standards. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1: Due to the wetland impacts, reduced buffer zones, and decreased total pervious area/increase in stormwater runoff, the City's environmental division is requiring an enhancement of the wetlands to include dredging a portion of the creek located on sheet 19 of the plans. Permits for this work must be obtained prior to first building permit. 7/11/05 Please submit a copy of the SWFWMD application permit prior to D.O. and a copy of the SWFWMD permit prior to City building permit. Response No. 1: All required permits to enhance/maintain the creek/ditch located on Sheet 19 will be secured prior to a request for the first building permit request. A copy of the SWFWMD application and subsequent approval will be supplied to the City prior to requesting the building permits. IDE E WED AUG 18 2005 3 PLATING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARMFER • ORIGINAL Comment No. 2: All exotic, invasive vegetation must be removed from the project site and adjacent rights-of-way. 7/11/05 Submit a letter of agreement to the Environmental division for the removal of the existing exotic vegetation from the site and adjacent right-of-ways prior to D.O. Response No. 2: A note has been added to Sheet 17 stating that existing exotic vegetation will be removed from the site and adjacent rights-of- way of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road. As a condition of approval, this work will be completed prior to requesting building permits. Comment No. 3: All wet retention ponds require a 35% planted littoral zone. Revise plans to include detailed littoral cross-sections prior to building permit. Response No. 3: All wet retention ponds will have a 35% planted littoral zone. This resubmittal indicates the location of the littoral zones. Planting details will be added prior to submittal for building permit. The plants selected including planting density will be native species compatible with the hydrology of the ponds. Comment No. 4: During construction activities, such as dewatering, groundwater testing and/or NPDES permitting is required as well as notifications to FDEP and the City of Clearwater's environmental division. Response No. 4: Notifications will be made to all entities mentioned in this comment. FIRE: Comment No. 1: Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 1: This comment is understood by the applicant. Comment No. 2: ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR_TO-CDB 1-3 # El Response No. 2: This comment is understood by the Applicant. R? h ID All i; 18 2005 4 PU??!WING DEPARNMEMT r'ITV OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL Comment No. 3: It appears that all townhouses are to be 2 story. If there are to be any townhouses of 3 or more stories they will have to be provided with fire sprinkler systems. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 3: This comment is understood by the Applicant, however, there are no townhouses of three or more stories in this project. HARBOR MASTER: No Comments. LEGAL: No Comments. LAND RESOURCES: Comment No. 1: The tree removal data is conflicting. Some trees that appear to need removal are shown to stay and the removal symbols differ. Remove the central "X" from the tree symbol so the species can be legible. Revise prior to CDB. Response No. 1: Plans have been revised and the "X" has been removed. Comment No. 2: The trees are not shown on sheet #28. Provide prior to CDB. Response No. 2: Trees have been added to Sheet #28. Comment No. 3: Insure that all proposed grades do not change too drastically at trees to be preserved. A thorough review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. Provide prior to CDB. Response No. 3: A separate document will be submitted directly to Rick Albee containing more detail regarding grades, utilities, etc., in order to show how the critical root zones will be protected. Additional information will be provided with the required Tree Preservation Plan. R 7cn E?VED gm 18 2005 P!AMM1 GCDEPARTMENT CUY OF EA W AR 5 9 * ORIGINAL Comment No. 4: It appears that some trees can be incorporated into the TOB of the retention ponds. Insure that proposed grades incorporate the trees critical root zones. Also insure that the proposed swales and berms do not impact the trees critical root zones. Revise prior to CDB. Response No. 4: The plans have been revised to incorporate the existing trees where reasonable. The Tree Preservation Plan will address any additional measures necessary for appropriate tree preservation. Comment No. 5: Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts i.e.; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to Build Permit. Response No. 5: A Tree Preservation Plan will be submitted directly to Rick Albee prior to Building Permit. Comment No. 6: Some tree canopies of trees to be preserved are missing from the landscape plan. Show all trees to be preserved with their canopies on ALL plans prior to CDB. Response No. 6: Tree canopies have been added to the document submitted directly to Rick Albee and clarified on the landscape plan. LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: Per Section 3-1204.D. all landscaping must be protected from vehicular and pedestrian traffic by the installation of curbing and wheel stops, or other protective devices along the perimeter of any landscaping which adjoins vehicular use areas and sidewalks. These protective devices shall have a minimum height of six inches above grade. Response No. 1: The appropriate type of curbing, wheel stops, etc., have been added to protect landscaping from vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Please seethe plans. f `(,, e ® 6 AUG 18 2005 PL 0,15 MG DElA-RDAE i CI dY OF CLEARWATER • • ORGI,v/AL Sheet 34A/35 indicates that the "typical type 1 type curb section" are shown on the paving, grading and drainage sheets. However, Sheets 18-22 do not indicate the Type 1 curbing locations. Response No. 1: This issue has now been addressed on Sheets 18 through 22. Indicate what type of curbing is being installed at the clubhouse/cabana/pool amenity area. Indicate the wheel stops on Sheet 8/35. Response No. 1: This issue has now been addressed on Sheet 8. Comment No. 2: . Sheets LA3-LA7 - Add Red Maple, Pond and Bald Cypress to the retention areas. Response No. 2: The plans have been revised to incorporate additional trees to the retention areas. Comment No. 3: Sheets LA3 through LA7 - It is difficult to determine the start and end of fencing or walls within the landscape buffer area. Label on each sheet the "end of fence" or "end of wall" on each end of such. When adjacent/close to an off-site road right-of-way (not the internal roadways), indicate the setback from the adjacent off-site road right-of- way line to the fence (Code only permits a three-foot high fence/wall within the front setback). Response No. 3: The limits of the wall have been added to the appropriate sheets in the Landscape Plan and the Site Plan. Comment No. 4: Sheet LA5 - Show compliance with the six-foot high opaque fence requirement to buffer the residential structures located opposite the entrance to the Tampa Bay Water property (Section 6.1.3.9 of the Development Agreement). Show location of the fence. Response No. 4: This issue has been addressed, as requested, on Sheet LA5. Comment No. 5: Sheet LA5 - A six-foot high fence is indicated adjacent to the industrial property. Is this a solid/opaque fence? Fence height within the first 25 feet from the Enterprise Road right-of-way line cannot exceed three feet. Revise Response No. 5: The 6' high fence along this area has been revised to a 6' high wall which does not extend into the first 25' from Enterprise Road. R ECEWE® 7 AUG 18 2005 PLE`Mk'IMG DE;RATI ME NT CITY OF CLEARWP ° • 0 ORIGINAL Comment No. 6: Sheets LA5 and LA6 - Due to the impacts industrial uses can and do have on adjacent residential uses, and since it is the townhomes that are being developed at this time adjacent to existing industrial uses, and since it has already been identified that at least one of the industrial users next door produces noise, and since the townhomes to be constructed along this portion of the property are two-story in height, and since the trees along this common boundary are proposed to be removed, instead of the six-foot high Y Egc 4 1 fence being proposed Staff will support a request for or require the construction of an eight-foot high masonry wall along the common property line with the industrial AUG I b 20.5 properties to the east. This wall will need to be enhanced on the townhome side with shade trees a minimum of every pMWMINGDEPAM MIEN1 35 feet (that will grow to provide visual screening above the CRYOFCL.EApV,14rr!¢ wall and to lessen noise impacts) and a continuous hedge. However, this eight-foot high wall will require a Flexible Development application for attached dwellings with the increase in wall height as part of the request. Response No. 6: At this time the applicant has decided to install a 6' high masonry wall in this area. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727- 562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Note Site table needs to be corrected to show wetland sq ft and/or acres. Response No. 1: The applicant is aware of the requirements regarding impact fees for open space/recreation. The site table has been revised to show the on-site wetland acreage. STORMWATER: Comment No. 1: Provide off-site topographic information up to 50-feet off the property lines and including the FFE of adjacent buildings Response No. 1: Additional topographic information has been obtained and shown on the drawings. Some finished floor elevations have been obtained, but it was not possible to obtain all finished floor elevations for adjacent units. We believe that the additional 8 • ?? ORIGINAL topographic information for the rear yards of all of the units is sufficient to address this issue. Comment No. 2: Align proposed drainage easement and Curlew Creek to be centered in the easement and extending at least from top of bank to top of bank (50-foot minimum). Response No. 2: A new drainage easement that conforms to this requirement has been added to the plans. Comment No. 3: Provide calculations for flow through culverts at roadway crossings. Response No. 3: Calculations are included with this resubmittal. Comment No. 4: City has concern of runoff adversely impacting adjacent properties, especially as the rear swales lose shape and subjected to modification. Applicant must provide assurance. Consider larger berms and the incorporation of additional ditch bottom inlets. Some areas of concern are: page 21 east boundary provide 50' of topo; page 18, west boundary are 12" ADS yard drains sufficient for flow, where do they flow to? Response No. 4: The applicant is also concerned about eliminating any adverse impact to adjacent property owners. Considerable thought has been incorporated in the design in order to eliminate as much area as possible of the former golf course from draining onto the existing residential and industrial areas. In addition, in those areas where the existing residential areas drained onto the golf course, those flows have been incorporated into this design. Therefore, we believe that we have adequately addressed this question. Comment No. 5: Table of Contents does not match Drainage Calculations. Response No. 5: The table of contents now matches the drainage calculations. Comment No. 6: No written narrative in calculations. Response No. 6: A written narrative is now included. Comment No. 7: Add Pre and Post-development Basin-Node-Link Schematic, provide a pictorial representation of model. Response No. 7: The current document complies with this issue. l Orp AUG 18 2005 9 PLAYIMNG DEPARTMENT CITY 0 F CCAR., I-TE 7 i • ORIGINAL Comment No. 8: Describe and show (tables, charts, etc.) no net increase in flow and no impacts upstream or downstream. Response No. 8: The current document complies with this matter. Comment No. 9: There is no discussion, methodology or calculations related to water quality. Response No. 9: Water quality calculations are included in the document. Comment No. 10: There is no discussion, methodology or calculations related to wetland impacts. Response No. 10: Wetland impacts are now discussed in the resubmittal. Comment No. 11: Show construction of berm on Countryside Blvd. in plan view. Response No. 11: The berm along Countryside Boulevard is now shown in plan view. Comment No. 12: Show pipe along Countryside Blvd. from Enterprise toward SW to headwall. Response No. 12: The existing pipe has been added to the plans. Comment No. 13: Demonstrate capacity in pipe along Countryside Boulevard, increase pipe if this fails capacity. Response No. 13: It is our understanding that since this pipe does not carry any flow from the site it is not necessary to demonstrate the capacity of this pipe, or increase pipe size. SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: That solid waste & recycling service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930. Response No. 1: The applicant understands the comment and will contact Tom Glenn prior to issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. r?L? ? E!=3D AUG 18 2005 PM %MING DEPARTMENT 10 UY CE CLEARIVAN R ORIGINAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Provide pedestrian crosswalks with accessible ramps at all intersections that have sidewalks. Response No. 1: Pedestrian crosswalks and accessible ramps are shown on detail sheet 34 and will be constructed at all intersections that have sidewalks. Comment No. 2: Show 20' x 20' sight distance triangles at all roadway intersections per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. Response No. 2: The site triangles have been added to the appropriate sheets in the plans. Comment No. 3: For driveways show a typical detail of 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles with a general note stating "Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement." Response No. 3: Please see the detail that has been added to Sheet 7 to address this issue. Comment No. 4: All driveways must have a minimum length of 20' from face of garage to the back edge of sidewalk. Response No. 4: All driveways are a minimum 20' in length from the face of the garage to the back edge of the sidewalk. Please see detail on Sheet 34A. Comment No. 5: Add stop bar to all stop signs. Response No. 5: Stop bars have been added to all stop signs. Comment No. 6: Add to General Note: "All traffic signs and markings must conform with the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices." Response No. 6 Comment No. 7: Response No. 7 This note has been added to the general notes on the cover sheet and to Sheet 7. Show typical parking space dimension for the club house complying with current City standards. Dimensions are now included WED AUG 1.8 2005 11 PLC %M11MG DEPAMP -WIT CV-,V OF CLE,K'RW ;213 • • ORIGINAL Comment No. 8: Provide crosswalks on Sienna and Trebbiano Roads to provide access to club house. Response No. 8: This crosswalk has been added to the plans. Comment No. 9: Provide acceleration and deceleration lanes for Countryside Blvd/Newbbiolo Road. Response No. 9: This comment has been eliminated by the City of Clearwater. Comment No. 10: Provide deceleration lane for Belcher Road/Corvina Road. Response No. 10: This comment has been eliminated by the City of Clearwater. Comment No. 11: Provide plans for channelized right turn lane to prevent northbound to westbound movements at the S.R. 580/Enterprise Road intersection (Development Agreement Section 6.1.3.5). Response No. 11: As a result of the DRC meeting, we have added a concept sketch for this issue. Please see Sheet 24. Detailed construction plans will be submitted for City approval prior to the building permit and coordination/approval with FDOT will also occur prior to building permit. "Prior to the issuance of building permits provide necessary right-of-way permits from Pinellas County and/or FDOT, if there are any improvements or work done on County or State rights-of-way. "Traffic Impact fees to be determined and paid prior to C.O. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Provide reduced site plans, landscape plans and building elevations (8.5" x 11"), rendered at least for the front elevation, with resubmission package for CDB (15 copies). Response No. 1: The applicant is resubmitting this application as a Flexible Standard Development Application which will not require approval by the CDB and, therefore, it is our understanding that the requested document is no longer needed. Lrlr\ AU6 18 2055 12 P1&MEMING DEPARIN M-1 ax OF C RPIP IR 0 • ORIGINAL Comment No. 2: 7/27/05 - WW As part of the Site Plan package of Sheets 1-35 of 35, provide a typical building layout of the two building types (Venetian Bay and Bloomingdale), the same as has been done under the Landscape Plan typicals on Sheets LA-1 and LA-2, providing the width of the driveways (single-wide and double-side), the dimensions of units, providing the square footage of the unit types, the location and dimensions of any stoops and patios in the front or rear of the units, indicating whether any of these stoops or patios will be covered (or have the options of being covered by the unit purchaser), showing unit sidewalks, indicating the location, type and height of any unit fencing along unit property lines, indicating whether there are any accessory uses allowable for units (such as sheds, pools, spas, screen rooms, etc. - including where (setbacks) from unit lot lines such may be placed, showing all roof overhangs by dashed lines (with dimensions of length/width of overhang), showing all second floor balconies (if any), etc. 10/21/04 - WW Stoops and patios at the rear of units are structures by the Code and must meet setback requirements. Show all stoops and patios on all appropriate plans, including the dimension to the existing, outside property lines. If any patios are to be covered, indicate such. Response No. 2: There are no "stoops" in the project. All patios for the Venetian Bay product are already contained in the building footprint. Patios for the Bloomingdale product vary in size from 6' x 10' to 10' x 10' and are subject to the selection of the buyer. A configuration for each of the patios is shown on the plans. Please see Sheet 7 for Typical Detail for each building type. Mcri?CE. U Ns, S ? ? I V E= 0 AUG 18 2005 PIMMING DEPARTIMEIT Cr+! OF CLEF<YAWW v . 13 0 0 ORIGINAL Comment No. 3: 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Address signage for development, by showing the location of freestanding sign(s), the setbacks from property lines, the relationship to sight visibility triangles and the relationship to landscaping. Provide a typical (general) front elevation with dimensions (width, length and height) and proposed sign colors. Note: The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available for residential projects. Need to meet general code requirements. Response No. 3: Signage will be addressed at a later date. Comment No. 4: 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Sheets LA3 through LA7 - Indicate the width (dimension) of proposed perimeter buffers along all property lines. Response No. 4: This revision has now been made. Comment No. 5: 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Sheet 1 of 35 - Include in Land Use Data table: a. "Proposed" "Paved Vehicular Areas" - Parking lot for clubhouse must be included or more clearly identified/separated out as part of this calculation. Response No. a: The "paved vehicular area" is now shown on the cover sheet. b. "Proposed" Interior Landscape Area" - Provide for parking lot of clubhouse parking lot (if greater, 10% of vehicular use area required). Response No. b: The "interior landscape area" is now shown on the cover sheet. Please see Sheet 8 for the location of the interior landscape areas. c. "Use" under "Criteria (min/max)" - Change "Flexible Standard (Level 1)" to "Flexible Development (Level 2)". Response No. c: Since this project will not go before the Community Development Board, this change has not been made. The r? `'? ?? appropriate request is now shown on the application. The Pproject now complies with all criteria for Attached Dwellings as a 1'? L'? ?? Flexible Standard (Level 1) approval and a new application for AUG 18 2005 Flexible Standard has been prepared as part of this resubmittal. P MJ1MG DEPARTMEM7 CITY OF Cl.EARWAIE-? 14 0 0 ORIGINAL Comment No. 6: 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Sheet 1 of 35 - Under General Notes #8 it is indicated that individual unit pick-up is to be provided for solid waste collection. Expand this statement as to where the black barrels will be stored (inside the unit garages?) and address solid waste collection for the clubhouse/cabana. If a dumpster is to be provided, show the location, setbacks and details of enclosure. If black barrel(s) to be utilized, indicate the location of where it/they will be stored (with required screening). Response No. 6: General Note #8 has been revised to indicate that individual pickup will be required and the black barrels will be stored inside the garages. In addition a dumpster will be provided at the club house. This is now shown on the plans. Comment No. 7: 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Response No. 7: cIiY OF CtEAr'r Provide, as part of site plan set, one sheet that shows the entire proposed development, so that the entire development can be viewed in its entirety from an overview standpoint. Also provide a reduced (8.5" x 11 ") version for presentation purposes as part of resubmittal package. Due to the size and complexity of the site plan application, multiple pages are required to illustrate all of the required submittal information. Each page contains a key plan that orients the reviewer to the overall project. In addition, there is a concept plan associated with the previously approved Development Agreement that shows the entire project. With regard to the reduced site plan for presentation purposes, the project is now being reviewed as a Flexible Standard application; since a public hearing will not be required, no presentation plans are necessary. Comment No. 8: 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Per Section 3-1908.A, the City may require the undergrounding of existing above ground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way. Due to the frontage of this project along Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road, underground these facilities. Response No. 8: Comment noted. As no standards are provided to guide the City's decision whether to require undergrounding of existing 15 0 ? ORIGINAL utilities, the applicant's attorney believes that undergrounding cannot be required. Comment No. 9: Sheet 22/35 - There are two Sections E-E indicated on the drawing. The eastern E-E is near the right hand match line and would not be the same cross section as depicted in Section E-E at the bottom of the page. Revise. Response No. 9: The cross sections on Sheet 22 have been revised. Comment No. 10: Sheet 10/35 (civil plans) - Lot line between Units 189 and 190 needs to be revised so that the driveway for Unit 189 does not cross over onto the lot for Unit 190, or revise the driveway for Unit 189 to not cross the lot line. Response No. 10: These lot lines have now been revised (between Lots 189 and 190). Comment No. 11: Need to submit a complete application for the vacation of the water line easement to the Engineering Department prior to scheduling this request for CDB. Response No. 11: A completed application is in the process of being submitted to the City. Comment No. 12: Sheet 18/35 - Show the landscape buffer on Section B-B (like Section A-A). Response No. 12: The landscape buffer has been added to Section B-B. Comment No. 13: Sheet 22/35 - Indicate the landscape buffer on Sections G- G and H-H (like Section A-A on Sheet 18/35). Response No. 13: The landscape buffer has been added to these sections on Sheet 22. Comment No. 14: Sheet 19/35 - Is there any way the building containing Units 57-62 be shifted to eliminate the dropoff in the northwest corner of Unit 62, so that Unit 62 could have a flat private rear yard for fencing, etc.? Response No. 15: The building containing Units 57 through 62 has been relocated. AUG 18 2005 MYNING DEPARTMENT C1 TV OF CLEARMI EP 16 • • ORIGINA Comment No. 15: Sheet 20/35 - Is there any way the rear lot lines for Units 93- 96 be reduced to eliminate the dropoff in the rear due to the Channel A, so that these units could have a flat private rear yard for fencing, etc.? Response No. 15: The rear lot lines for Units 93 through 96 has been relocated to comply with this comment. Comment No. 16: Sheets 12-16/35 - Preliminary Plat - provide the lot area for each lot (either in tabular form or on each lot). Response No. 16: The purpose of this requirement seems to be to confirm that the project will meet all dimensional requirements of the MDR zoning district and/or to insure compliance with land use plan density. The minimum lot area required in the MDR district is 10,000 square feet and the site's size of 44.2 acres more than meets this requirement. The MDR zoning district does not have a minimum lot size for the individual townhouse units. With regard to the second purpose, the project will be developed at less than the Residential Urban plan category and is further governed through a Development Agreement that limits the number of units. The City of Clearwater code does require that the dimensions of each lot be shown on the final plat and that is consistent with Florida Statutes requirements for subdivision plats. In summary, the developer requests that showing final dimensions of each lot be deferred until submittal of the final plat for the following reasons: • each lot may change slightly during preparation of final plat and construction drawings; • preparation of the lot sizes for 240 lots is a significant amount of work on a project of this size and the information will not change the review comments since there is no minimum individual townhouse lot size requirement in the MDR district; • the project has demonstrated that it complies with the overall density of the Residential Urban plan category; and • the dimensions of all lots will be shown on the final plat submitted for review by the City. ul9' Lg ?? AUG 18 2005 PL-AL X MIG mp!? A ENT 17 CITY OF CLaR?ijATZD • ORIGINAL Comment No. 17: Sheets 7-11/35 - Provide dimensions from the front property line to the closest building facade for each building and dimensions from the outside golf course boundary lines to the closest building facade for each building. Response No. 17: Additional dimensions have been added. In addition, please see the detail on Sheet 34A indicating the "minimum" distance from the front property line to the building facade. Comment No. 18: Provide the proposed square footage for the clubhouse/cabana on Sheet 8/35. Response No. 18: The square footage for the clubhouse has been added to the cover sheet and is also now shown on Sheet 8. Comment No. 19: Provide all four elevations for both building types (Venetian Bay and Bloomingdale; both colored elevations resubmitted recently are indicated as "Venetian" even though one is a "Bloomingdale"), including proposed exterior materials and color (at least the front elevation must be rendered to indicate the proposed colors; other sides must at least indicate the color by name). Provide the proposed height to the midpoint of the highest pitched roof. Response No. 19: Since this project will not be reviewed by the Community Development Board, we believe the response to this comment is not necessary. Comment No. 20: Sheet 8/35 - Dimension the width and length of parking spaces, the drive aisle width, the driveway widths, the width of the terminal and interior landscape islands for the clubhouse/cabana area. Also provide the setback from the property lines of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road to the cabana and the pool deck. Unclear why the ends of the parking spaces are within the ingress/egress easement of Sienna Road (explain or pull back to the edge of the easement line). What type of fencing is proposed around the pool? Response No. 20: Dimensions have been added as requested. The type of fencing proposed around the pool is the same type of fence that has been added to screen parking spaces from adjacent rights- of-way in accordance with City standard s (iFJ11-1 \IS I I - - C IL Er=-= 1? V ..,- ELM: - LID AUG 18 2005 PLAMMING DEPP-Mi MENT 18 CHY OF CLEAR ."i0 s • ORIGINAL Comment No. 21: Sheet 8/35 - Unclear why sidewalks are not being provided: 1) on the north side of Trebbiano Road between Sienna Road and Malvasia Road. From a pedestrian safety standpoint, someone walking or riding a bike to the clubhouse/cabana/pool is being forced to cross Trebbiano Road at Sienna Road to access the amenity; Response No. 1): The sidewalk has now been added. 2) on the east side of Trebbiano Road between Countryside Blvd. and Sienna Road; Response No. 2): The sidewalk has now been added. 3) on the south side of Corvina Road between Enterprise Road and Malvasia Road; Response No. 3): The sidewalk has now been added. Comment No. 22: Sheet 9/35 - Unclear why a sidewalk is not being provided on the north/east side of Corvina Road between Units 100 and 110. Revise. Response No. 22: The sidewalk has now been added. Comment No. 23: With the changes in the proposal to incorporate the restaurant area into the development and to increase the setback (to pavement) adjacent to Belcher Road, the proposal has changed the nature of the request under the Residential Infill Project FLD application, primarily due to the nonscreening of off-street parking from adjacent streets and properties by a four-foot high landscaped wall or fence (FLD criteria for attached dwellings; however, also due to Staffs desire to have an eight-foot high masonry wall adjacent to the industrial properties to the east - see Landscape comments). The application will need to either provide the required landscaped fence or wall for basically the perimeter of the property or request a deviation to partially eliminate the landscaped fence or wall requirement to screen parking from adjacent streets and properties, including the complete justification for such deviation. Response No. 23: As mentioned above, the applicant does not desire at this time r? to construct a masonry wall greater than 6' in height along the ,I] t industrial properties. This decision is subject to reconsideration V 1C?W ? DD in the future. In addition the appropriate fences (4' in height) AUG 18 2005 have been added to screen parking from adjacent streets and PLAMMING DEPARTMENT 19 C'X 0 f?Lr'A 0 ORIGINAL properties. Therefore, there is no reason for the project to be considered by the Community Development Board and, therefore, this comment is no longer relevant. OTHER: No Comments #353271 v1 - Beazer/FDC Response to Comments T V ?? E Q AUG 18 2005 PLAXi'MI lG DEPARTMEMT CITY OF CLEARWATER% 20 -3111 A?1G 18 2DD5 RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS BEAZER HOMES CORP. PEVI NWS DEPAR- PAS Y PLT2004-00017 - 2506 Countryside Blvd. ORIGINAL GENERAL ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: The following to be addressed on the final plat: 1) Need a letter from the postmaster approving the proposed private street names prior to final plat submittal. Response No. 1: A request has been made to the Post Master for approval of all the private street names. When the final plat is submitted, we will.document that all street names have been approved by the Post Master. Comment No. 2: Sidewalk easements will be required for all proposed sidewalk segments that meander out of the proposed ingress/egress easement. Response No. 2: Sidewalk easements have been added where the sidewalk meanders out of the ingress/egress easement in order to save trees. Please see Sheets 8, 9 and 11 for the location of these areas. Comment 3: Private drainage easements required for all storm mains outside the ingress/egress easement. Response No. 3: Private drainage easements have been shown on the final plat for all storm mains outside the ingress/egress easement. Comment No. 4: Grant an additional easement for the existing 6" force main if force main meanders outside the existing 10 ft. drainage and utility easement. Response No. 4: Based on the City's atlas it appears that the existing forcemain is, in fact, in the existing ten foot drainage and utility easement. In the event that, during construction, it becomes apparent that the City atlas is incorrect, an additional easement will be granted or the forcemain moved to its proper location. Comment No. 5: Provide utility easement(s) for sanitary sewers or water lines not in common area or ingress/egress easement. Response No. 5: The final plat will provide the appropriate utility easements for sanitary sewer, water lines, etc., not in common area or ingress/egress easements. • • ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1: Response No. 1: FIRE: Comment No. 1: See comments under FLD2004-11077. ORIGINAL An appropriate response j s made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmittal. See comments under FLD2004-11077. Response No. 1: An appropriate response is made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmitta-.F= HARBOR MASTER: No. Comments. LEGAL: Comment No. 1: Response No. 1: LAND RESOURCES: Comment No. 1: Response No. 1: LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: See comments under FLD2004-11077. AUG 18 2005 MONG DEPA. Mffk ?T C1rY OF CC`ARWPjTER An appropriate response is made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmittal. See comments under FLD2004-11077. An appropriate response is made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmittal. See comments under FLD2004-11077. An appropriate response is made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmittal. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1: Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to final plat. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: It is understood that this fee is due prior to final plat. 2 STORMWATER: ORIGINAL Comment No. 1: See comments under FLD2004-11077. Response No. 1: An appropriate response is made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmittal. SOLID WASTE: Comment No. 1: See comments under FLD2004-11077. Response No. 1: An appropriate response is made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmittal. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Applicant to address comments of FLD2004-11077. Response No. 1: An appropriate response is made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmittal. PLANNING: Comment No. 1: See conditions under FLD2004-11077. Response No. 1: An appropriate response is made under the resubmittal of FLD2004-11007. Please see that resubmittal. OTHER: No Comments #353274 v1? L? AUG 18 2005 PLAVSKI G DEM- RTMEW C1 W OF CLEARWATER 3 1 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 3:32 PM To: 'John Andrews' Subject: RE: Costa Verdi John - I have checked the plans. The square footage of the other units is not on the plans. Sorry. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: John Andrews [mailto:mandrews0l@tampabay.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:53 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Costa Verdi Hi Wayne, I was with you this AM to get a couple 8 1/2" x 11" copies of the two Beazer townhouse profiles. Two things: 1) the sq.ft of the one profile ( at the top says townhomes) is not shown. Could you send that to me.The other plan 2547 does show the sq. ft. 2) 1 left a sheet of yellow tablet paper with some hand written notes on the work area counter. Could you please fax it to me at 727-724-8001. 1 sure would appreciate it - save me a trip there again. Thanks again. John Andrews - Alexa Realty mandrews01(ab-tampabay.rr.com 727-724-8000 8/8/2007 Clearwater Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: --JCS I? ,? H+? ?? DATE: $ 110 7 FAX: -7Z-4- S D 0 f TELEPHONE: v FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4504 SUBJECT: ?o c `/ er MESSAGE: NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Z Aug. 07 2007 04:52PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97248001 'Aug.07 04:51PM 00'51 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HEL3-FAX (435-7329). V C) VA kvN 03 . h 1' ` f4t~ AtZ • • t 4A . i ? 71{ F r2 0? ?t v.? ?, pl?l tf y II } I-+' c I-AA O.tJ P-%) 1 0 u I' I r? Y C7 0 This instrument was prepared by and return to: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY FLORIDA INST# 2006260510 0711212006 at 04:30 PM OFF REC BK: 15239 PG: 991394 DocType:RST RECORDING: $35.50 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT: A. EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation ("Owner") is the owner of the land located in Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"); and B. Owner entered into a Second Amended Development Agreement with the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("City"), dated May 30, 2006, recorded in O.R. Book 15155, Page 2700, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; C. In accordance with the terms of the Development Agreement, Owner is obligated to record a deed restriction affecting the use of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of premises and for other good and valuable consideration, Owner, for itself and its successors in title to the Property, does hereby place upon the Property the following covenants to run with the Property in perpetuity: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Use Restrictions. The following restrictions shall apply to the development of the Property: a) The Property shall be developed substantially in conformance with the conceptual plan attached to the Development Agreement as Sheet 1 of 2 of Exhibit "B" ("Concept Plan"). The estimated population density and maximum building intensity are shown on the Concept Plan. The locations of the ponds and 0, 6, roads shown on the Concept Plan are approximate and may change as a result of the requirements of applicable regulatory agencies or other design considerations. b) Building height shall not exceed 35 feet (two stories). c) The architectural style of the townhomes to be constructed on the Property shall be substantially as shown on the renderings attached to the Development Agreement as Exhibit "C." d) The landscape buffering for the westerly side of the Property adjacent to existing residential development shall be substantially as described on Sheet 2 of 2 of Exhibit "B" attached to the Development Agreement. Building setbacks shall meet the requirements of the Clearwater Community Development Code ("Code") and may be located in whole or in part within the landscape buffer. e) The Owner shall construct at its cost an extension of a turn lane on Countryside Blvd. as shown on the Concept Plan and shall post the security therefor as required by Code §4-606 GA.e. f) The Owner shall grant (i) a utility easement for water service five (5) feet on either side of the constructed water lines on the Property and (ii) simultaneously with vacation by the City of that portion of the easement recorded in O.R. Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, a replacement easement that relates to the remaining active wells operated by the City on the Property. g) The project to be developed on the Property shall not have vehicular access to Laurelwood Drive. h) On the west side of Enterprise Road, the Owner shall extend north to the project entrance (+/- 400 feet) the existing southbound to westbound right turn lane at the Enterprise Road/Countryside Blvd. intersection, all at the Owner's cost. i) The Owner shall buffer any residential structures-located opposite the entrance, to. the Tama Bay'Wate7 proaeity to t#e-east-with a six foot high opaque fence, so as to diminish any adverse impact of headlights of vehicles exiting the Tampa Bay Water property. j) Egress from the Property onto Enterprise Road shall permit only a right out movement. Ingress into the Property from Enterprise Road shall permit right in and left in movements 3. Binding Effect. This Declaration shall constitute a covenant running with the Property, as provided by law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned and all successors in title to the Property, and their heirs, successors and assigns. 2 • • 4. Modification or Termination. This Declaration may not be modified in any respect whatsoever, or rescinded, in whole or in part, except with the written consent of the City, in a written instrument duly recorded in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. IN WIT SS WHEREOF, Owner has executed this Declaration this o L y , 2006. WITNESSES: EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation ?_---? By: ignature S. Lee Crouch, President Nl'vD /77/ / ? Print name Q'b ga Signature C ani «C K- t EC-?? Print name Date: < //0 6'c Address: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE The oregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2006, by S. Lee Crouch, as President of CORPO ION Q--,EL-EARWATER, IIVL , orida corporation, on corporation. a [is personally known to me] roduced identification]. Notary Public Print name: C?(lt?a? K Fe 11ani My commission expires: Exhibit'W' - Legal Description of Property .. ChfftKovainNion caOM Much 13,2W? 07/08/08 01:23 PM d-1 45403.108701 #378705 v1 Vo' day of EXECUTIVE behalf of said as 3 A tract of land lying in Sections 30 and 31,. Township.28 South, Range 16 East; City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the West 1/4 Corner of said Section 30;'thence run South 0°19'55"- East, along the west line of said Section*30, for 444.65 feet; thence South 89°55'13" East for 50.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue South 89°55'13" . East for 1558.45 feet to a point on the west line of "Dunedin Industrial Park" as recorded in Plat Book 64, Page 76, Records of Pinellas County,. Florida; thence South 0°0447" West for 937.36 feet to the southwest comer: of said Plat; thence South 89°55'13'.' East, along .the south line of said plat, for. 247.5.5 feet to a point on the westerly. :igbt=of- way line of. Enterprise Road; thence 16.61 feet along the. said westerly right-of=way line and the arc of a curve that is concave to the northeast, having a radius of 895.00 feet, a chord length of 16.61 feet and a chord bearing of South 9°27'20" East to a point of compound curvature with a curve that is also ' concave to the northeast; thence 261.09 feet along the are of said curve having a radius .of 330.00 feet, a chord. length of 254.33 feet and a chord bearing of South 32°39'10" East to a point of tangency; thence South 55°19'05" East for 345.77 feet. to a point of curvature of a curve of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 96.09 feet along the are of said curve having a radius-of 170.00 feet, a chord length of 94.82 feet and a chord bearing of South 39°07'31" East to a point of tangency; thence South 22°55'56_ " East for 143.70 feet to a point of curvature of a curve that is concave to the northeast; thence 286.62 feet along the are of said curve having a radius of 405.00 feet, a chord length of 280.68 feet and a chord bearing of South 43°12'18" East to a point of reverse curvature with a curve that. is concave to the southwest; thence 102.23 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius 6f 250.00 feet; a chord length 'of 101.52 feet and a chord bearing of South 51°45'54" East to a point of compound curvature with a curve that is concave to the west; thence 49.17 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 30.00 feet, a chord length of 43.85 and a chord bearing of South 6°54'15" West to a point of tangency, the same point being on the northwesterly right-of-way line of Countryside Boulevard; thence South 53°51'32.' West,'along said right-of-way line, for 592.43 feet to a point of curvature of a curve that 'is concave to the- southeast, thence 1059.47 feet along the are, of said curve having a radius of 1960.00 feet, a chord length of 1046.62 feet and a chord bearing of South 38°22'24" West; thence, leaving said right-of-way line, North 67°06'44" West for 164.15 feet; thence North 10°30'36" West for 674.3.! feet; thence North 62°54'47" West for 114.19 feet to a .point on the arc of a curve that is concave to the northwest; thence 98.14 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 490.00 feet, a chord length of 97.97 feet and a chord bearing of North 21°20'58" East; thence South 85°55'13" East for 382.97 feet; thence North 53°18'37" East for 254.00 feet; thence North 10°04'50" West for 228.53 feet; thence North 36°15'14" East for 111.61 feet; thence North 14°28'28" West for 444.10 feet; thence North 58°15'59" West for 446.79. feet; thence Soutli 74°34'52" West for 206.75 feet to a point on the arc of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 37.09 feet along the arc' of said curve having a radius of 590.00 feet, a chord length of 37.08 feet and a chord bearing of North 17°13'11" West; thence North 62°12'34" East for 288.57 feet; thence North 3°59'27" West for 431.05 feet; thence North 44°05'26" West for-445.53 feet; thence South 79°28'45" West for 983.07 feet; thence North 0°19'55 West for 393.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. • • ,, Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:09 AM To: Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Wells, Wayne Cc: Judy Hull; sleecrouch@aol.com; Tim A. Johnson; Ed Mazur Subject: Costa Verde - 2506 Countryside Blvd. - DVA 2004-0004 14? Dec. pdf Attached for your file is a copy of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants recorded in O.R. Book 15239, Page 991, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, which was recorded by owner in accordance with the terms of the development agreement. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 <<Dec. pdf» Case Number: FLS2005-08060 DRC Agenda Date: September 29, 2005 Owner: Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc., 5260 Applicant: Beazer Homes Corporation Representative: Mr. Timothy A. Johnson, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Address: 2506 Countryside Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Flexible Standard Development to permit 240 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 240 townhome lots (PLT2004-00017); and (3) Vacation of a utility easement. EXISTING ZONING/ Medium Density Residential (MDR) District; Residential Urban (RU) Category LAND USE: PROPERTY SIZE: 44.277 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Golf course and restaurant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (240 townhomes) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Institutional, High Density Residential and County Districts; LAND USES: Church, attached dwellings and industrial uses (County) East: Office and County Districts; Offices and industrial uses (County) South: Low Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and Open Space/Recreation Districts; Detached dwellings, attached dwellings and City park West: Low Medium Density Residential, Medium Density Residential and County Districts; Detached dwellings and attached dwellings CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The area to the east is developed with nonresidential uses (offices and industrial uses), while the area to the north is developed with attached dwellings and a church. Areas to the south and west are developed with detached and attached dwellings. Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 1 of 9 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 44.277 acres is located at the northwest corner of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road and on the east side of Belcher Road, approximately 500 feet south of S.R. 580. The site has been a golf course, with the Dogwater Cafe restaurant at the intersection of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road. The golf course and restaurant will be removed with this proposal. The property had been zoned Open Space/Recreation District. The City Council and the Countywide Planning Authority have approved a land use change to Residential Urban (RU) category and the City Council has approved a rezoning to Medium Density Residential District (LUZ2004-08005). City Council approved a Development Agreement (DVA2004-00004) on May 19, 2005, that basically limited development to 280 dwelling units, approved a conceptual plan for the property, restricted building height to a maximum of 35 feet (two stories), set building setbacks, provided for landscape buffer standards along the west side of the property and opposite the Tampa Bay Water property, prohibited vehicular access to Laurelwood Drive, required intersection improvements at Enterprise Road and Countryside Boulevard and required intersection improvements at Enterprise Road and SR 580. An amendment to this Development Agreement (DVA2004-00004A) was approved by the City Council on February 16, 2006, restricting egress onto Enterprise Road as a right out movement only. The property to the south across Countryside Boulevard is presently developed with detached dwellings and a City park. The property to the east is presently developed with office and industrial uses. The property to the west is presently developed with detached and attached dwellings. The property to the north is presently developed with a church and attached dwellings. Proposal: While the land use designation of Residential Urban would permit the construction of a maximum of 332 dwellings, and the approved Development Agreement restricted the maximum number of dwellings to be constructed to 280 dwellings, the applicant has further reduced the proposed density of the project to 240 dwelling units (5.42 dwelling units per acre). The proposal includes constructing the 240 dwellings into two-story, townhome-style attached dwellings. Two building styles are proposed with between three to six townhomes per building. A Venetian Bay product, to be constructed on the southern portion of the site, features the townhome with one and two-story portions of the dwelling and two-car garages. A Bloomingdale product, to be constructed on the northern portion of the site, is designed more resembling a complete two-story building with dwellings two-story in height and having either one or two-car garages. The Bloomingdale models will permit either a six-foot by 10-foot or a 10-foot by 10-foot covered patio at the rear of the units. However, due to the site constraints and buffering approved under the Development Agreement, Units 106 and 131 - 134 will need to be limited to only a six-foot by 10- foot, covered rear patio. Evidence of this patio size restriction for these units, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, will need to be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. . Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 2 of 9 The proposal was submitted for review when the Code parking requirement was 1.5 spaces per unit. The proposal provides two parking spaces per unit (which meets current Code requirements). With the Venetian Bay product, parking can be accommodated within the two-car garages or within the driveways. With the Bloomingdale product, parking is accommodated combined in the one-car garage and in the driveway (for the single-car garage units). All dwelling units will be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the private rights-of-way lines to avoid vehicles overhanging the sidewalks within the rights-of-way. All minimum setback requirements for the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District are being exceeded. This is due, in part, to the landscape buffers set up and approved to adjacent, existing residential development. The Development Agreement and this proposal sets out the specific buffering to be provided along the property lines for the protection and mitigation of negative impacts (apparent or perceived) to the adjacent uses. The applicant worked especially with the homeowners of the detached and attached dwelling projects to the west of this property to provide acceptable buffering, in the form of berms, hedging, trees and fences/walls. The applicant is providing a six-foot high solid wall, in addition to hedging and trees, adjacent to the industrial uses to the east for buffering purposes (to the rear of Units 110 - 153). Additionally, at the request of Tampa Bay Water across Enterprise Road, the applicant is constructing a six-foot high solid wall to minimize vehicle headlight intrusion into the rear of Units 93 - 100. Any approval of this request should require these walls to be finished with stucco, be painted and be maintained by the homeowner's association. The proposal is compatible and consistent with the attached dwelling character of the immediate vicinity, especially in light of the reduced density, the increased setbacks, the provision of landscape buffering exceeding Code, the restriction of access and the restriction to building height. While the Development Agreement restricted the height of the townhome buildings to a maximum of 35 feet (two stories), the Venetian Bay product has been designed 22.17 feet in height (to midpoint of pitched roof) and the Bloomingdale product has been designed 24.58 feet in height (to midpoint of pitched roof). The clubhouse at the intersection of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road will be 29.25 feet in height. The townhomes will be finished in stucco painted "compatible cream" or "latte" for the main building color, accented by "kilim beige" trim, and "sienna sunset" asphaltic shingle roofs. Front doors will be accented with a darker earth color. The landscaping around the townhome units utilizes groundcover (African iris, crinum lily, downey jasmine and parson's juniper), shrubs (hibiscus, dwarf Indian hawthorn, sandankwa viburnum loropetalum) and trees (live oak, southern magnolia and crape myrtle). Along roadways (Countryside Boulevard, Enterprise Road and Belcher Road), adjacent to residential, church or industrial properties and within the property the project will be planted with shrubs (sweet viburnum, ixora, hibiscus, simpson stopper, florida anise and muhly grass) and trees (live oak, southern magnolia, sweet gum, crape myrtle, slash pine, red maple, winged elm, pond cypress and bald cypress). The applicant has shown entry signage for the project at all roadway entrances on Countryside Boulevard, Enterprise Road and Belcher Road. These freestanding signs will need to meet Code provisions, should be monument-style and should be designed to match the exterior materials and Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 3 of 9 • • colors of the townhome buildings. The existing signs for the restaurant and the golf course adjacent to Countryside Boulevard must be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. On-site utility facilities (electric and communication lines) will be required to be placed underground as part of the site redevelopment. There do exist overhead power lines for streetlights along Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road. In accordance with Section 3- 1908.A, these existing overhead electric lines for the streetlights along the frontage of Enterprise Road and at the intersection of Enterprise Road and Countryside Boulevard should be placed underground prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant is subdividing the property to allow fee simple ownership of each townhome unit. The submitted Preliminary Plat has been reviewed by the Development Review Committee and been found to meet Code provisions. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Attached Dwellings criteria in the Medium Density Residential District (Section 2-303.A) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 4 of 9 • • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: Sections 2-301.1 and 2-303) STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 240 dwelling units (Limited to a X DENSITY (7.5 maximum of 280 dwelling units [a]) dwelling units per (proposed density = 5.42 dwelling acre) (332 dwelling units per acre) units maximum) IMPERVIOUS 0.70 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) 0.95 maximum LOT AREA (10,000 44.277 acres X s q. feet minimum LOT WIDTH (100 Countryside Blvd: 1639 feet X feet minimum) Enterprise Road: 1282 feet Belcher Road: 394 feet FRONT SETBACK Countryside Blvd: 30 feet X (25 feet) Enterprise Road: 25 feet Belcher Road: 27 feet REAR SETBACK (10 20 feet (to building and patio) X feet) SIDE SETBACK 20 feet (to building); 16 feet (to X (Five feet pavement) HEIGHT (30-40 feet Venetian Bay model: 22.17 feet (to X maximum) midpoint of pitched roof) Bloomingdale model: 24.58 feet (to midpoint of itched roof) PARKING SPACES Two spaces per unit X (1.5 spaces per unit - attached dwellings [b] * See discussion under Analysis. (a) Limited by the Development Agreement (DVA2004-00004 and DVA2004-00004A). (b) Submitted prior to Code change requiring two spaces per unit. Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 5 of 9 • • COMPLIANCE WITH ATTACHED DWELLING FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2- 303.A): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Height: X a. The increased height results in an improved site plan, landscaping areas in excess of the minimum required and/or improved design and appearance; b. The increased height will not reduce the vertical component of the view from a parcel of land which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 2. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel X which is designated as low density residential in the Zoning Atlas. 3. Off-street parking is screened from adjacent parcels of land and any X adjacent street by a landscaped wall for fence of at least four feet in height. * See discussion under Analysis. CC)MPLIANCF WITH GFNFRA1 fiTANDARn,q (Cectinn 3-913)- Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 44.277 acres are designated Residential Urban (RU) Category and zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, which permits a maximum of 332 dwelling units; Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 6 of 9 2. The subject site is currently developed as a golf course with a restaurant (Dogwater Cafe) at the intersection of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road; 3. City Council approved a Development Agreement (DVA2004-00004) on May 19, 2005, that basically limited development to 280 dwelling units, approved a conceptual plan for the property, restricted building height to a maximum of 35 feet (two stories), set building setbacks, provided for landscape buffer standards along the west side of the property and opposite the Tampa Bay Water property, prohibited vehicular access to Laurelwood Drive, required intersection improvements at Enterprise Road and Countryside Boulevard and required intersection improvements at Enterprise Road and SR 580; 4. City Council approved an amended Development Agreement (DVA2004-00004) on February 16, 2006, restricting egress onto Enterprise Road as a right out movement only; 5. The proposal includes the construction of 240 dwelling units in townhome-style buildings of between three and six units per building; 6. The proposed townhome buildings of two-stories are consistent with that approved in the Development Agreement; 7. Buffering exceeding Code provisions, in compliance with that approved in the Development Agreement, has been provided adjacent to the residential properties to the west and adjacent to the industrial properties to the east; 8. All required setbacks are met or exceeded; 9. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development; and 10. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Attached Dwelling Flexible Standard Development criteria per Section 2-303.A; 2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and 3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 29, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the (1) Flexible Standard Development to permit 240 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 240 townhome lots (PLT2004-00017); and (3) Vacation of a utility easement, for the site at 2506 Countryside Boulevard, with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Attached Dwelling criteria under the provisions of Section 2- 303.A; 2. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 3. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 7 of 9 0 0 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the buildings be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted with this application; 2. That Units 106 and 131 - 134 be limited to a six-foot by 10-foot, covered rear patio. Evidence of this restriction, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the six-foot high solid wall to the rear of Units 93 - 100 and to the rear of Units 110 - 153 be finished with stucco, be painted and be maintained by the homeowner's association; 4. That existing signs for the restaurant and the golf course adjacent to Countryside Boulevard be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 5. That freestanding signage meet Code provisions, be monument-style and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the buildings; 6. That the easement be extended to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (suggested from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement); 7. That a note be placed on the Final Plat and within the Homeowners Association documents that the City of Clearwater's responsibility of the ditch along Countryside Boulevard will be for maintenance of flow only. All other maintenance, to include erosion, aesthetics, mowing and tree trimming, will be the sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association; 8. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. In addition, the existing overhead electric lines for the streetlights along the frontage of Enterprise Road and at the intersection of Enterprise Road and Countryside Boulevard be placed underground prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 9. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the following be shown on revised civil plan drawings: a. Eliminate the connector drive between the ends of the "Y" at the north end of Dolcetto Road. Extend/lengthen the pavement northwest for Unit 180 to allow the trash truck adequate backup, but maintaining the 22-foot north setback (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on southeast side of driveway); b. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 21/35 across the street from Unit 180 and Note 1 below Section A-A; c. Extend/lengthen pavement to the end of Nebbiolo Road in front of Unit 20 to have pavement for the roadway end at an angle, maintaining the 20-foot setback indicated (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on south side of driveway or slightly in front of Unit 19); d. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 18/35 across the street from Unit 17 and Note 2 to the right of Section A-A; and e. A dumpster enclosure, meeting City specifications and designed with exterior materials and colors of the principal buildings, be provided at the cabana/clubhouse, meeting a 25-foot front setback to Enterprise Road; 10. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Tree Preservation Plan (Plan) be provided to the Planning Department, prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 8 of 9 0 0 or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This Plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts (ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems). Other data required on this Plan must show the tree's canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), tree barricade detail and any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. The Plan must especially address grade changes along the property lines adjacent to the residential uses to the west and the incorporation of existing trees into the top of bank of the retention ponds; and 11. That, prior to the issuance of building permits or the recording of the Final Plat, whichever occurs first, open space/recreation impact fees be paid. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Q6 4M - ?/& Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Location Map Aerial Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentIC D BTlex Standard (FLS)IPending Cases12 - Reviewed and PendinglCountryside Blvd 2506 Costa Verde at Countryside (MDR) 9.29.05 DRC - WMCountryside 2506 FLS2005-08060.PLT2004-00017 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - February 21, 2006 Cases FLS2005-08060/PLT2004-00017 - Page 9 of 9 - 4 0 0 Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 9:31 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Petrie,Todd Subject: FW: Costa Verde NOI 0125966-233-DSGP Wayne, Has the DO been issued for this? I contacted Ed Mazur regarding this situation back in November and have not heard anything since. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Petrie,Todd Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 7:45 AM To: Rice, Scott Subject: FW: Costa Verde NOI 0125966-233-DSGP Hi Scott, It seems as if FL Design has not responded to the DOH. Is there anything the City needs to do with their application? Thanks for your help. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel, Glenn Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 7:06 AM To: Neff, Andrew; Petrie,Todd Subject: FW: Costa Verde NOI 0125966-233-DSGP FYI -----Original Message----- From: Gale_Reed@doh.state.fl.us [mailto:Gale_Reed@doh.state.fl.us] Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 6:05 PM To: ocabrera@fldesign.com Cc: emazur@fidesign.com; Paul_Stanek@doh.state.fl.us; Mark Pabst@doh.state.fl.us; Daniel, Glenn Subject: FW: Costa Verde NOI 0125966-233-DSGP Hi: We have not received a response to either my e-mail dated November 10, 2005, or Mark Pabst's e-mail dated November 1, 2005. In addition, I e-mailed Mr. Mazur a copy of 62-555, F.A.C., on November 8, 2005, so that your office could review the setback requirements established for public drinking water wells. I also have been unsuccessful in reaching any person assigned to this project in your office by phone. 10/8/2006 Page 2 of 2 Since we have not received a response to our inquiries from either your office or that of your permittee, we are maintaining one copy of your application in our files and returning the remaining three copies to you at this time. Should you wish to proceed with this project, please contact Paul Stanek at 727-538-7277, Extension 1111. Gale J. Reed Environmental Specialist II Drinking Water Section Environmental Engineering Pinellas County Health Department 4175 East Bay Drive, Suite 300 Clearwater, Florida 33764 Telephone 727-538-7277, Extension 1113 Fax Number 727-507-4255 From: Reed, Gale J Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:10 PM To: 'emazur@fldesign.com' Cc: Pabst, Mark Subject: FW: Costa Verde NOI 0125966-233-DSGP Hi: I am forwarding you this email in case you were unaware of the request. Gale J. Reed Environmental Specialist II Drinking Water Section Environmental Engineering Pinellas County Health Department 4175 East Bay Drive, Suite 300 Clearwater, Florida 33764 Telephone 727-538-7277, Extension 1113 Fax Number 727-507-4255 From: Pabst, Mark Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 2:55 PM To: 'Ocabrera@fldesign.com' Cc: Stanek, Paul; DeGenaro, Stephanie R; Reed, Gale J Subject: Costa Verde NOI 0125966-233-DSGP Mr. Cabrera: I have been looking over your plans for the above referenced project and I had a few questions and was hoping you could help me out. On Sheets 25 & 28 you show two active city of Clearwater wells (# 56, 63). As part of our review, we need to determine the set back distance around these wells. Can you please provide a scaled site plan around each well showing the locations of existing and proposed building? Thanks for your help in this matter, Mark 10/8/2006 ORIGINAL AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ;Vkr 040 THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT A ("AGREEMENT") is dated , 2005, effective as provided in Section 5 of this Agreement, and entered into between EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation ("OWNER"), and the CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida acting through its City Council ("COUNCIL"), the governing body thereof ("CITY"). RECITALS: A. Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes, which set forth the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act ("ACT"), authorize the CITY to enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable interest in real property located within the corporate limits of the City. B. Under Section 163.3223 of the ACT, the CITY has adopted Section 4-606 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code ("CODE"), establishing procedures and requirements to consider and enter into development agreements. C. OWNER owns approximately 44.2 acres m.o.l. of real property ('PROPERTY") in the corporate limits of the City, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. D. OWNER or its successor, desires to develop the Property as a townhome community, consisting of not more than 280 units, generally conforming to the concept plan ("CONCEPT PLAN") shown on Sheet 1 of 2 on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. E. The PROPERTY currently has a land use designation of Recreation/Open Space and is zoned OS/R. F. In order to develop the PROPERTY, consisting of 44.2 acres, with up to 280 residential units, OWNER has requested that the City place the following on the PROPERTY: (I) a land use designation of Residential Urban (7.5 units/acre) and (ii) a zoning designation of MDR (Medium Density Residential). G. The CITY and OWNER have determined that it would be mutually beneficial to enter into a development agreement governing the matters set forth herein and have negotiated this AGREEMENT in accordance with the CODE and the ACT. Nov 0 P 1 r 0 .1 ? 0 H. The CITY has found that the terms of, and future development orders associated with, this AGREEMENT are consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and OR 41 G I NA 1- the CODE. 1. On May 31 2005, the CITY and the OWNER entered into a Development Agreement, which the parties wish to amend and restate in its entirety as set forth below. STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT In consideration of and in reliance upon the premises, the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound and in accordance with the ACT, agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are true and correct and are a part of this AGREEMENT. SECTION 2. INCORPORATION OF THE ACT This AGREEMENT Is entered into in compliance with and under the authority of the CODE and the ACT, the terms of which as of the date of this AGREEMENT are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT. Words used in this AGREEMENT without definition that are defined in the ACT shall have the same meaning in this AGREEMENT as in the ACT. SECTION 3. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS AGREEMENT The PROPERTY is subject to this AGREEMENT. SECTION 4. OWNERSHIP The PROPERTY is owned in fee simple by OWNER SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE/DURATION OF THIS AGREEMENT 5.1 This AGREEMENT shall become effective as provided for by the ACT and shall be contingent upon 5.1.1 Obtaining final approval, and effectiveness of a land use designation of Residential Urban and a zoning designation of MDR as requested on the PROPERTY; and 5.1.2 Conveyance by OWNER of the PROPERTY to Beazer Homes Corp., a Tennessee corporation. 5.2 This AGREEMENT shall continue in effect until terminated as defined herein but for a period not to exceed ten (10) years. SECTION 6. OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT 2 NOV 0 2 7005 't _ C, 6.1 Obligations of the OWNER 6.1.1. The obligations under this AGREEMENT shall be binding on OWNER, its successors or assigns. 6.1.2. At the time of development of the PROPERTY, OWNER will submit such applications and documentation as are required by law and shall comply with the City's CODE applicable at the time of development review. 6.1.3. The following restrictions shall apply to development of the PROPERTY: 6.1.3.1 The PROPERTY shall be developed substantially in conformance with the CONCEPT PLAN. The estimated population density and maximum building intensity are shown on the CONCEPT PLAN. The locations of the ponds and roads shown on the CONCEPT PLAN are approximate and may change as a result of the requirements of applicable regulatory agencies or other design considerations. 6.1.3.2 Building height shall not exceed 35 feet (two stories). 6.1.3.3 The architectural style of the townhomes to be constructed on the Property shall be substantially as shown on the renderings attached hereto as Exhibit "C." 6.1.3.4 The landscape buffering for the westerly side of the Property adjacent to existing residential development shall be substantially as described on Sheet 2 of 2 on Exhibit "B.". Building setbacks shall meet the requirements of the CODE and may be located in whole or in part within the landscape buffer. OR, c', I, f?%J iii ',H 6.1.3.5 The OWNER shall construct at its cost an extension o_ f a turn Deleted: (i) a channerZed right turn lane on Countryside Blvd. as shown on the CONCEPT PLAN and shall post the security lane to prevent the NB to WB movement and (ii) therefor as required by CODE §4-606 G.1.e. 6.1.3.6 The OWNER shall grant, i a utility easement for water service five (5) feet on either side of the constructed water lines on the PROPERTY and ii simultaneously with vacation by the CITY of that portion of the easement recorded in O.R. Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida a replacement easement that relates to the remaining active wells operated by the CITY on the Property. 6.1.3.7. The project to be developed on the PROPERTY shall not have vehicular access to Laurelwood Drive: 6.1.3.8 On the west side of Enterprise Road, the OWNER shall extend north to the project entrance (+/- 400 feet) the existing SB to WB right turn lane at the Enterprise Road/Countryside Blvd. intersection, all at the OWNER's cost. 0 NOV 0 2 2005 Deleted: a Deleted: , that relates to two (2) water well sites that have been abandoned by the CITY 0 0 6.1.3.9. The OWNER shall buffer any residential structures located opposite the entrance to the Tampa Bay Water property to the east with a six foot high opaque fence, so as to diminish any adverse impact of headlights of vehicles exiting the Tampa Bay Water property. 6.1.3.9. Egress from the PROPERTY onto Enterprise Road shall permit only a right out movement. Ingress into the PROPERTY from Enterprise Road shall permit right in and left in movements. 6.1.4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the PROPERTY, Owner shall record a deed restriction encumbering the PROPERTY, which deed restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and which will generally describe the development limitations of this AGREEMENT. The deed restriction shall be perpetual and may be amended or terminated only with the consent of the CITY, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 6.2. Obligations of the City 6.2.1 Concurrent with the approval of this AGREEMENT, the COUNCIL shall promptly process amendments to the land use plan and zoning designation for the PROPERTY as set forth in Recital F above, all in accordance with the CODE. 6.2.2 City will approve site and construction plans for the PROPERTY that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the CONCEPT PLAN and that meet the requirements of the CODE. 6.2.3 The City shall consider the vacation of the easement recorded in 0. R. Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County Florida_ 6.2.4 The final effectiveness of the redesignations referenced in Section 6.2.1. is subject to: 6.2.5.1 The provisions of Chapter 125 and 163, Florida Statutes, as they may govern such amendments; and 6.2.5.2 The expiration of any appeal periods or, if an appeal is filed, at the conclusion of such appeal. SECTION 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES TO SERVICE DEVELOPMENT facilities are presently available to the PROPERTY from Development of the PROPERTY will be governed by provisions applicable at the time of development 4 The following public the sources indicated below. the concurrency ordinance approval. With respect to ORIGINAL <#>To the maximum extent allowed by law, the CCTV shall utilize transportation impact fees paid to it by the OWNER in connection with the proposed development for the design, permitting, and construction of the transportation improvement required at the intersection of State Road 580 and Enterprise to mitigate the transportation impacts of the proposed development.¶ I Deleted: easements described in Section 6.1.3.6. NOV 0 2 2005 transportation, the concurrency provisions for the proposed development have been met. 7.1. Potable water from the CITY. 7.2. Sewer service is currently provided by the CITY. 7.3. Fire protection from the CITY. 7.4. Drainage facilities for the parcel will be provided by OWNER. 7.5 Reclaimed water from the CITY, if available. 7.6. Solid waste from the CITY SECTION 8. REQUIRED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERMITS The required local government development permits for development of the PROPERTY include, without limitation, the following: 8.1. Site plan approval(s) and associated utility licenses, access, and right-of-way utilization permits; 8.2. Construction plan approval(s); 8.3. Building permit(s); and 8.4. Certificate(s) of occupancy. SECTION 9. CONSISTENCY The CITY finds that development of the PROPERTY consistent with the terms of this AGREEMENT is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 10. TERMINATION 10.1. If OWNER's obligations set forth in this AGREEMENT are not followed in a timely manner, as determined by the City Manager, after notice to OWNER and an opportunity to be heard, existing permits shall be administratively suspended and issuance of new permits suspended until OWNER has fulfilled its obligations. Failure timely to fulfill its obligations may serve as a basis for termination of this AGREEMENT by the CITY, at the discretion of the CITY and after notice to OWNER and an opportunity for OWNER to be heard. 5 ORIGINAL NOV 0 2 2085 s ?, B 1 A "i SECTION 11. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS PA L 11.1. Except in the case of termination, until ten (10) years after the date of this AGREEMENT, the PROPERTY shall not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless the CITY has held a public hearing and determined: 11.1.1 That substantial changes have occurred in pertinent conditions existing at the time of approval of this AGREEMENT; or 11.1.2 This AGREEMENT is based on substantially inaccurate information provided by OWNER; or 11.1.3 That the change is essential to the public health, safety or welfare. SECTION 12. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW The failure of this AGREEMENT to address any particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve OWNER from the necessity of complying with the law governing such permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions. SECTION 13. NOTICES Notices and communications required or desired to be given under this Agreement shall be given to the parties by hand delivery, by nationally recognized overnight courier service such as Federal Express, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows (copies as provided below shall be required for proper notice to be given): If to OWNER: Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc. 5260 South Landings Drive, Ariel #704 Fort Myers, FL 33919 With copy to: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut St. Clearwater, FL 33756 If to CITY: City Council of City of Clearwater c/o City Manager 112 South Osceola Avenue P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756 Properly addressed, postage prepaid, notices or communications shall be deemed delivered and received on the day of hand delivery, the next business day after deposit with an overnight courier service for next day delivery, or on the third (3rd) day following deposit in the United States mail, certified mail, return receipt requested. The parties 6 N10V 0 2 2005 0 0 'may change the addresses set forth above (including the addition of a mortgagee to receive copies of all notices), by notice in accordance with this Section. SECTION 14. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. SECTION 15. MINOR NON-COMPLIANCE OWNER will not be deemed to have failed to comply with the terms of this AGREEMENT in the event such non-compliance, in the judgment of the City Administrator, reasonably exercised, is a minor or inconsequential nature. SECTION 16. COVENANT OF COOPERATION The parties shall cooperate with and deal with each other in good faith and assist each other in the performance of the provisions of this AGREEMENT and in achieving the completion of development of the PROPERTY. SECTION 17. APPROVALS Whenever an approval or consent is required under or contemplated by this AGREEMENT such approval or consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. All such approvals and consents shall be requested and granted in writing. SECTION 18. COMPLETION OF AGREEMENT Upon the completion of performance of this AGREEMENT or its revocation or termination, a statement evidencing such completion, revocation or termination shall be signed by the parties hereto and recorded in the official records of the CITY. SECTION 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT (including any and all Exhibits attached hereto all of which are a part of this AGREEMENT to the same extent as if such Exhibits were set forth in full in the body of this AGREEMENT), constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof. SECTION 20. CONSTRUCTION The titles, captions and section numbers in this AGREEMENT are inserted for convenient reference only and do not define or limit the scope or intent and should not be used in the interpretation of any section, subsection or provision of this AGREEMENT. Whenever the context requires or permits, the singular shall include the plural, and plural shall include the singular and any reference in this AGREEMENT to OWNER includes OWNER's successors or assigns. This AGREEMENT was the production of negotiations between representatives for the CITY and OWNER and the language of the Agreement should be given its plain and ordinary meaning and should not be construed against any party hereto. If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT is susceptible to more than one interpretation, one or more of which render it valid and enforceable, and one or more of which would render it invalid or unenforceable, such term or provision shall be construed in a manner that would render it valid and enforceable. SECTION 21. PARTIAL INVALIDITY If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is declared invalid or 7 0) R, I G 11 IN' J A % 1. - NOV fl; 2 20,15 0 10 'unenforceable, the remainder of this AGREEMENT, including any valid portion of the invalid term or provision and the application of such invalid term or provision to circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and shall with the remainder of this AGREEMENT continue unmodified and in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such responsibilities of any party thereto to the extent that the purpose of this AGREEMENT or the benefits sought to be received hereunder are frustrated, such party shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT upon fifteen (15) days notice to the other parties. SECTION 22. CODE AMENDMENTS Subsequently adopted ordinances and codes of the CITY which are of general application not governing the development of land shall be applicable to the PROPERTY, and such modifications are specifically anticipated in this AGREEMENT. SECTION 23. GOVERNING LAw This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without regard to the conflict of laws principles of such state. SECTION 24. COUNTERPARTS This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall continue one and the same instrument. Section 25. TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The Development Agreement entered into by the parties on May 31, 2005, is hereby terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto executed this AGREEMENT the date and year first above written. [End of Substantive Provisions, Signature Page to follow.] 8 0, R G 1.-N A • WITNESSES: Printed Name: Printed Name: Countersigned: Frank V. Hibbard Mayor Approved as to form: Leslie K. Dougall-Sides Assistant City Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA CITY OF PINELLAS 0 EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation By: S. Lee Crouch President CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA By: William B. Horne II Attest: Cynthia E. Goudeau City Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2005, by S. Lee Crouch, as President of EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who ? is personally known to me or who ? produced as identification. Notary Public Print Name: 9 OD 10- 1 NIA-1. NOV 0 2 2005 0 0 STATE OF FLORIDA ) CITY OF PINELLAS ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 2005, by Frank V. Hibbard, as Mayor of the City of Clearwater, Florida, who ? is personally known to me or who ? produced identification. Notary Public Print Name: STATE OF FLORIDA ) CITY OF PINELLAS ) The foregoing instrument, was acknowledged before me this 2005, by William B. Horne II, City Manager of the City of Clearwater, Florida, who ? is personally known to me or who ? produced identification. Notary Public Print Name: Exhibits: A Legal Description of Property B Concept Plan C Building Elevations 11/02/05 0908 Ar -- --A . -- ----- --- _ -- _ - -------------------- ------------ - --- - - Deleted: 10/31/0510:15 AM 45403.108701 ? ?...... _...... __._........._.._......_. #359033 vt - Beazer/Countryside/Development Agreement (Amended) Inserted: 10/31/05 10:15 AM Deleted: 10/26/05 04:49 PM ............................... _............................ _....... ................. _.._........... 10 JNV'U C- 2 2005 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land lying in Sections 30 and 31, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the West 1/4 Corner of said Section 30; thence run South 0°19'55" East, along the west line of said Section 30, for 444.65 feet; thence South 89°55'13" East for 50.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue South 89°55'13" East for 1558.45 feet to a point on the west line of "Dunedin Industrial Park" as recorded in Plat Book 64, Page 76, Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence South 0°04'47" West for 937.36 feet to the southwest corner of said Plat; thence South 89°55'13" East, along the south line of said plat, for 247.55 feet to a point on the westerly right-of- way line of Enterprise Road; thence 16.61 feet along the said westerly right-of-way line and the arc of a curve that is concave to the northeast, having a radius of 895.00 feet, a chord length of 16.61 feet and a chord bearing of South 9°27'20" East to a point of compound curvature with a curve that is also concave to the northeast; thence 261.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 330.00 feet, a chord length of 254.33 feet and a chord bearing of South 32°39'10" East to a point of tangency; thence South 55°19'05" East for 345.77 feet to a point of curvature of a curve of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 96.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 170.00 feet, a chord length of 94.82 feet and a chord bearing of South 39°07'31" East to a point of tangency; thence South 22°55'56" East for 143.70 feet to a point of curvature of a curve that is concave to the northeast; thence 286.62 feet along the are of said curve having a radius of 405.00 feet, a chord length of 280.68 feet and a chord bearing of South 43°12'18" East to a point of reverse curvature with a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 102.23 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 250.00 feet; a chord length of 101.52 feet and a chord bearing of South 51 °45'54" East to a point of compound curvature with a curve that is concave to the west; thence 49.17 feet along the are of said curve having a radius of 30.00 feet, a chord length of 43.85 and a chord bearing of South 6°54'15" West to a point of tangency, the same point being on the northwesterly right-of-way line of Countryside Boulevard; thence South 53°51'32" West, along said right-of-way line, for 592.43 feet to a point of curvature of a curve that is concave to the southeast, thence 1059.47 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 1960.00 feet, a chord length of 1046.62 feet and a chord bearing of South 38°22'24" West; thence, leaving said right-of-way line, North 67°06'44" West for 164.15 feet; thence North 10°30'36" West for 674.31 feet; thence North 62°54'47" West for 114.19 feet to a point on the arc of a curve that is concave to the northwest; thence 98.14 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 490.00 feet, a chord length of 97.97 feet and a chord bearing of North 21 °20'58" East; thence South 85°55'13" East for 382.97 feet; thence North 53°18'37" East for 254.00 feet; thence North 10°04'50" West for 228.53 feet; thence North 36°15'14" East for 111.61 feet; thence North 14°28'28" West for 444.10 feet; thence North 58°15'59" West for 446.79 feet; thence South 74°34'52" West for 206.75 feet to a point on the are of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 37.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 590.00 feet, a chord length of 37.08 feet and a chord bearing of North 17°13'11" West; thence North 62°12'34" East for 288.57 feet; thence North 3°59'27" West for 431.05 feet; thence North 44°05'26" West for 445.53 feet; thence South 79°28'45" West for 983.07 feet; thence North 0°19'55" West for 393.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. NOV C 2 21105 • • Exhibit "B" • sheet 1 of 2 ORIGINAL. r t: LEGEND ,E? Project Boundary Stormwater Management System Estimated Wetland Limits Proposed Roads Proposed Building Locations"' Proposed 6' Height Wall Proposed W Height Fence - Location A .? Proposed 4' Height Fence - Location B Preliminary Land Use Data Table Project Area 44.2 Acres General Notes 1. Symbol represents approximate locations of future buildings, not building themselves Proposed buildings are to he 3, 4, 5 and 6 units. Data used is approximate and based on best available public sources 3. This plan is conceptual and based on development parameters & constraints known at this time. Final locations of buildings, roads and ponds may change and will he shown on future Site Plan submittal. Q Estimated population = 280 x 2-5 = 700 people 5.20' lamiscape buffer "ill be constructed along the property line that adjoins existing residential development at locations A and B where a 4' high xinyl coaled chain link fence is included. This landscape buffer may he located in %thole or in part within the 20' building setback. A 10' landscape buffer will be constructed along the property line where a 6' high wall is included. See sheet 2 of 2 for details 6. Project may contain up to 2 reemalional/amenity sites. Neither site will abut adjacent existing residential uses. 7. Building height not to exceed 35 feet. 8. The O"neror the property o" ners' association for the Property shall at its expense maintain both sides of am, wall that mai he constructed on or near the boundary of those portions of the Property abutting existing residential properties perNA .n Knew ?a ? na?wccs?casuavRrc ?? ? F ?? r P LM Q N 't C\1 t ? fi0 1 - C• COUNTRYSIDE EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSE CONCEPT PLAN Not in Exceed 280 Units eta 7 1-1omes • PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL s PRO POSED CAVOPI'TREF nw11f-...,,.n.? ACCENT TREE AT VARIOI'S L(X'ATIONS nA«. w,w rr,, v.1nrv, CONTINI'OLS BU'FF'ER HEDGE. XXLTMG RESMENnAL R' HT. VINYLCOATED ?CHAINLI.NK FENCE PROP0,NLD AlY'ENTTRFF AT _ VA RIOLS UI('ATIU\5 A`n,? I ' dITA4E 1UIR 11'I-1V1x mKmjt .1 -1'ARIIS -1 iXn0- K.11K TLAL 41 Ht. Fence • Location A Not Adj.,-1 to Ditch Ret teeW PROPOSED CANOPY TREE rr, Wn..„nc? wwlu„we....., i I COINTI.NI'OUS PROPOSED f' Dl'E'iHR HEDGE HIGH ALL d.41.14'B A.ut13 ? ?? ?? MttA4i .01113 YR'41V1A'.VE KATTJ ,0.0.41 L\6TIV I RI,Hd=T N. Buffer with Wall Not Adpeed to Ditch mod to -A. PBOPWIR) CANOPYTREE .; W 6 lr,r?+RVr,. ACCENT TREE AT VARIOUS LOCATION'S 41 HT. VINYL COATED PROPOSED CHAINLINK PENCE EASTDPG RESIDENTAL ??1Of RESmHNT1AL COYTI,NL'OL5 BUFFER HEDGE 1Rn1e i dvT.14T.1ARIf:Y J'1.14-A RITRR IR. TAKE1,IRIRY -111; KI-1111 -1 IL 4' Ht. Fence • Location B Not ,ldj-nt to Ditch Rd 1. M. e-- COUNTRYSIDE EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSE _a CONCEPT PLAN -TYPICAL SECTIONS 0 EXISTING TREES H ITH1, BI FFER AREA PROPOSED P EXINTINI. RESIDEYTIA I- - A'HT VI\1'I. (17ATED ? I RESIDENTLIL ( OZ11'%1OIS R CHAIN LINK FENCE il'FFER HEDGE . ur .lrvnleRR. EXISTING DITCH ?I I nnA4Cr.Rln r?lnnRn RnR nr.u? .AR A—; Wnv RoRe1TA1 4' Ht. Fence-Location A Ad*mt to DnhoW Ditch mol 1> eRk PROPOSXDCANOPY TREE n1L1r,11r f.ynn EXIS ING TREES ++w )>Ry1v.r+•+?+- nTTFBN BL'iFHR AREA TO BE REVIOYED IN AREAS A CONFTJCI7NG PTTH 1Y A15. CONSTRUCnON PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL MUSTING RESMENTIAL CONTINUOUS BIIFFE0.11EDGE EXISTINC DRAINAGE DITCH 111rwue.n j PROPOSED R• HIGH WALL [b1.1wZ 1ARes GY',+ZRm.R CrrtiA4l1A>n Alin `1\•FnV:RpIMV)A1. Buffer with Wall Adj-mi to DnhmV Dileh RN to Wak PROPOSED ACCENT TREE AT_ VARIOUS LOCATIONS N/rY,.i gnxr?.1YM+`ir rnNrm'ols BUFFER HEDGE PROPOSED RFSIDENTLIL EXISTING TREES V RTTHIN BUFFER AREA 1'NT. VINYLCOATED 1CHA1NL1,YN FENCE i EXISn.NG DRAINAGE DITCH IIVNRITtRR ? _ /i 1.., r, 1\pp Y I I 4' Ht. Fence • location B AdjRCmt to D-Irmo. Ditch Rd to xRl. • Exhibit "B" - Sheet 2 of 2 ORIGINAL F.%LSTiNC < f RESIDENTIAL 1 PI (p [Lu,! 11 I / - Be ?/?/(f/J I-tomes Countryside. Townhouse.. 4 UNIT VENETIAN ELEVATION Front Elevation t, a e, ?--? Roof Layout Rear Elevation 4e11 .Bey ?K Homes TEMPORARY IROCNVRC ONLY, NAY NOT RCFLCCT ACTUAL CMARACTCRISTICS OC TINISNEO NONE. fLOOR PLANS ARC SNOWN ONLY TOR OBPLAY PURPOSCS. WINDOW SIZES AND LOCATIONS, ROOM SIZES, AND OIMCNSIONS ARC AIPAORMAATC AND MAT VARY, PRICES ANO fEATVRES SUBJECT TO CMANOC WITHOUT NOTICE. PLEASE CONSULT SAM COUNSELOR fOR OESION UPDATES. _ O 2004 ICA2ER NOMES VIA, INC. i .` 2 2005 t i{j.JI? E-psy? ..,:h-5 cs a.. Q..?•1y??f f a ?c ? x CJ H W F- H O r1 n. N Countryside Townhouse 6 UNIT VENETIAN ELEVATION Front Elevation Roof Layout Rear Elevation Be aY Ho m e s T[MPORART BROCHURC ONLY, MAY NOT REFLECT ACTUAL CHARACTCRtSTICS Of nmISNEO NOMC. FLOOR PUNS ARE SHOWN OHLT FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES. WINDOW 112CS AND LOCATIONS, ROOM SIZES, AND OIM[NSIOHS ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAT VARY, PRICES AND fEATURCS SUSJCCT TO CHANCE WITHOUT `ern ?F NOTICE. PLCASC CONSULT SALES COUNSELOR TOR OCSION VIOATES. O 2004 OCAIER HOMES USA, INC. NO, V 0 2 2005 L. 4 " J L7 H N ?1 H ,O n C? N • t }g "g "3 ®w? '? t ?S Ei ! Fi • i Conditions Associated With FLS2005-08060 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 08/01/2005 8/1/05-Insure that all proposed grades do not change too drastically at trees to be preserved. A Not Met thorough review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. 9/26/05-The berm section A-A reflects a 4' high berm starting at the property line. This would conceivably bury every tree between the proerty line and the building foundation. This is why a thorough review must be performed at each tree to be preserved. Provide prior to DO. 12/7/05-Insure that the Tree Preservation Plan addresses all potential tree impacts prior to building permit. 08/01/2005 8/1/05-It appears that some trees can be incorporated into the TOB of the retention ponds. Insure Not Met that proposed grades incorporate the trees critical root zones. Also insure that the proposed swales and berms do not impact the trees critical root zones. 9/26/05-It still appears that some trees designated to be pereserved have severe grade changes. The pond contours do not incorporate the trees critical root zones. A thorough review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. Revise prior to DO. 12/7/05-Insure that the Tree Preservation Plan addresses all potential tree impacts prior to building permit. 08/01/2005 Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape Not Met architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to Build Permit. Parks & Recs Condition Debbie Reid 562-4818 09/16/2005 9/16/05 - Site data table has been corrected to show wetland sq, ft. and acreage. Not Met Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Note: Site table needs to be corrected to show wetland sq ft and/or acres. Storm Water Condition Jason Kinney 562-2604 09/20/2005 1. Provide a berm along Countryside Boulevard adequate for City of Clearwater to perform Not Met maintenance along the ditch (minimum 10 feet), ensure that berm is incorporated within the easement. (10/3/04 -comment superceded) 2. Extend the easement to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (Suggest from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement). 12/2/05 - NOT MET 3. It is the City of Clearwater belief that the pipe along Countryside Boulevard may be increased in diameter to meet allow for 10-year peak flow. Please ensure that development's internal culverts and piping would be sized sufficiently to allow for a an increase in flow as a result of replacing the upstream pipes without causing impacts. 12/2/05 - SEE APPLICANT RESPONSE Print Date: 02/17/2006 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 V 0 0 FLS2005-08060 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD Storm Water Condition Jason Kinney 562-2604 4. Note on Plat and within Homeowners Association Documents that the City of Clearwater's responsibility of the ditch along Countryside Boulevard will be for maintenance of flow only. All other maintenance to include erosion, aesthetics, mowing, and tree trimming will the be sole responsibility of the Homeowners Association. (this comment added on 10/3/05) 12/2/05 - ACKNOWLEDGED - THIS WILL REQUIRE FURTHER ATTENTION AT FINAL PLAT All of the above prior to DO. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn 562-4930 09/23/2005 2/13/06 - WW Per TJG, the cul-de-sac on Sienna Road is fine. Add as a condition of approval, the following: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, the following be shown on revised civil plan drawings: a. Eliminate the connector drive between the ends of the "Y" at the north end of Dolcetto Road. Extend/lengthen the pavement northwest for Unit 180 to allow the trash truck adequate backup, but maintaining the 22-foot north setback (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on southeast side of driveway); b. Remove the concrete pad shown on Sheet 21/35 across the street from Unit 180 and Note 1 (wrong page); c. Extend/lengthen pavement to the end of Nebbiolo Road in front of Unit 20 to have pavement for the roadway end at an angle, maintaining the 20-foot setback indicated (homeowner will need to place their black barrel on south side of driveway or slightly in front of Unit 19); and d. A dumpster enclosure, meeting City specifications and designed with exterior materials and colors of the principal buildings, be provided at the cabana/clubhouse, meeting a 25-foot front setback to Enterprise Road. 9/26/05 - TJG Black barrel service utilizes right side pickup. Provide cul-de-sac turnarounds on the east end of Sienna Road to pick up Lots 57-62, the north end of Dolcetto Road to pick up Lots 175-180 (rather than the "Y's" shown) and to pick up Lots 17-20 on Nebbiolo Road on the west side of the development . With the Y's the driver will have to back down the street to service these lots, which increases the risk of accidents. 9/14/05 - TJG Turnarounds at end of Sierina and Dolletto Roads Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 11/21/2004 2/13/06 - WW Include as a condition of approval. 9/25/05 - WW Place underground the existing overhead electric line for the street lights along the frontage of Enterprise Road and at the intersection of Enterprise Road and Countryside Blvd. 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Per Section 3-1908.A, the City may require the undergrounding of existing above ground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way. Due to the frontage of this project along Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road, underground these facilities. Not Met Not Met 07/24/2005 2/13/06 & 9/25/05 - WW Not Met Any approval of this proposal will be conditioned on the approval of the vacation by City Council prior to the issuance of any permits. 7/24/05 - WW Need to submit a complete application for the vacation of the water line easement to the Engineering Department prior to scheduling this request for CDB. Print Date: 02/17/2006 CaseConditons Page 2 of 3 FLS2005-08060 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 09/25/2005 2/13/06 - WW Not Met Include as a condition need to see condominium documents prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (see applicant's response). 9/25/05 - WW Sheet 9 - Unit 106 is indicated a 20-foot rear setback. Will Unit 106 be limited to a maximum 6'x10' patio/patio cover? If so, how will this Unit 106 be so restricted? Sheet 10 - Units 131-134 are only indicated a 6'x10' patio/patio cover. Same comment as above. 09/25/2005 2/13/06 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval. 9/25/05 - WW Existing signs indicated on Sheet 3 adjacent to Countryside Blvd. for the restaurant and the golf course must be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Print Date: 02/17/2006 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 • • Wells, Wayne From: Rickard, Leonard Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 7:17 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Boulevard Wayne , I will stop over this morning or if I am unavailable I will have Jim stop by. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 7:33 PM To: Rickard, Leonard Cc: Keller, James Subject: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Boulevard Lenny - I still have three "not met" conditions for Fire on the above referenced case. Could you look at the plans and response sheet and see if they can be changed to "met"? The plans and file (with response sheet) is in my office. I am trying to prepare a Development Order. Thanks. Wayne 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:35 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Blvd. Revised conditions to be met at Building Permit. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:07 PM To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Kurleman, Scott; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John; Strong, Steve; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Blvd. DRC members - Plans have been resubmitted for the above referenced project. This case went last to the September 29, 2005, DRC meeting. I have the original package in my folder. I have placed four copies of the revised submittal package on the file cabinets across from Conference Room 216. If you would like to take one, you may (but there are only four copies). Please review your previous comments to see if they have complied with your comments. Email me when you have completed your review and entered your information in Permit Plan. If there are conditions that should be included in the Development Order approving this case, let me know. If there are conditions still to be met, also let me know. Thanks, Wayne 0 1?1 Wells, Wayne From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:02 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FW: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Blvd. Wayne, P&P had requested a correct site data table, which was corrected in September. Only conditions we have left would be payment of our fee. Thanks! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Kader, Art Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:31 PM To: Reid, Debbie Subject: FW: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Blvd. fyi and follow up if needed -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:07 PM To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Kurleman, Scott; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John; Strong, Steve; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Blvd. DRC members - Plans have been resubmitted for the above referenced project. This case went last to the September 29, 2005, DRC meeting. I have the original package in my folder. I have placed four copies of the revised submittal package on the file cabinets across from Conference Room 216. If you would like to take one, you may (but there are only four copies). Please review your previous comments to see if they have complied with your comments. Email me when you have completed your review and entered your information in Permit Plan. If there are conditions that should be included in the Development Order approving this case, let me know. If there are conditions still to be met, also let me know. Thanks, Wayne 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 10:29 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLS2005-08060 - 2506 Countryside Wayne, I have reviewed the tes„bmittal for the subject application and updated Permit Plan. One comment not addressed is: Stormwater Comments 2. Extend the easement to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the nort,ic?ist corner of the site (Suggest from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement). 12/2/05 - NOT MET This could be a con(li:ion of the DO if we want to handle it that way. I will have other conditions. D. Sco It Brice Land Devel. r-ngr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:07 PM To: Albee, Rick; Blackburn, Anne; Buysse, Beverly A.; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Kurleman, Scott; Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Rice, Scott; Schodtler, John; Strong, Steve; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Blvd. DRC members - Plans have been resubmitted for the above referenced project. This case went last to the September 29, 2005, DRC meeting. I have the original package in my folder. I have placed four copies of the revised submittal package on the file cabinets across from Conference Room 216. If you would like to take one, you may (but there are only four copies). Please review your previous comments to see if they have complied with your comments. Email me when you have completed your review and entered your information in Permit Plan. If there are conditions that should be included in the Development Order approving this case, let me know. If there are conditions still to be met, also let me know. Thanks, Wayne 11:10 am Case Number: PLT2004-00017 -- 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD Owner(s): Executive Corp Clw Inc 2506 Countryside Blvd Clearwater, Fl 33763 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Beazer Homes Corp A Tennessee Corp 2630 S Falkenberg Road Riverview, FI 33569 TELEPHONE: 813-663-9002, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 44.2 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD AND ENTERPRISE ROAD AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF BELCHER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF S.R. 580 Atlas Page: 221A Zoning District: OS/R, Open Space/Recreation Dist Request: Preliminary Plat for a 240-lot, townhome residential subdivision. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Woodgate I & Ii Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33763 2345 Ashmore Drive TELEPHONE: 727-791-0848, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: jdelotto@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Woodgate Iii Neighbors Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33763 2360 Hazlewood Lane TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter:. Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: CITY STAFF: WAYNE WELLS, NEIL THOMPSON, SCOTT RICE, LENNY RICKARD, RICK ALBEE APPLICANT/REP: TIM JOHNSON, JAYNE SEARS, ED MAZUR, O. C. CABRERA The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . The following to be addressed on the final plat: 1) Need a letter from the postmaster approving the proposed private street names prior to final plat submittal. 2) Sidewalk easements will be required for all proposed sidewalk segments that meander out of the proposed ingress/egress easement. 3) Private drainage easements required for all storm mains outside the ingress/egress easement. 0. 4) Grant an additional easement for the existing 6" force main if force main meanders outside the a1N$WC` existing 10 ft. drainage and utility easement. Cam` 5) Provide utility easement(s) for sanitary sewers or water lines not in common area or ingress/egress easement. Final plat to be recorded with Pinellas County prior to building permit. Environmental: I . See comments under FLS2005-08060. Fire: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: I , See comments under FLS2005-08060. Land Resources: I . See comments under FLS2005-08060. Landscaping: 1 . See comments under FLS2005-08060. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 20 Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to final plat. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: I . See comments under FLS2005-08060. Solid Waste: 1 , See comments under FLS2005-08060. Traffic Engineering: I . Applicant to address comments of FLS2005-08060. Planning: 1 . See conditions under FLS2005-08060. Other: No Comments Notes: SEE FLS2005-08060 Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 21 0 0 11.10 am Case Number: FLS2005-08060 -- 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD Owner(s): Executive Corp Clw Inc 2506 Countryside Blvd Clearwater, Fl 33763 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Beazer Homes Corp. 2630 S. Falkenberg Road Riverview, Fl 33569 TELEPHONE: 813-663-9002, FAX: 813-663-9493, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818,.FAX: 727-462-0365, E-MAIL: timj@jpfirm.com Location: 44.27 acres located at the northwest corner of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road and on the east side of Belcher Road, approximately 500 feet south of S.R. 580 Atlas Page: 221A Zoning District: OS/R, Open Space/Recreation Dist Request: (1) Flexible Standard Development to permit 240 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 240 townhome lots (PLT2004-00017); and (3) Vacation of a utility easement. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Woodgate Iii Neighbors Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33763 2360 Hazlewood Lane TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Woodgate I & Ii Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33763 2345 Ashmore Drive TELEPHONE: 727-791-0848, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: jdelotto@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard, Rick Albee Applicant/Rep: Tim Johnson, Jayne Sears, Ed Mazur, (6-Exbre?a t J.?? ?y1 ` "'?< <M' The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. On the preliminary plat, Sheet 16 of 35, and all the appropriate sheets, move the proposed raw water easement to the south into the buffer off of lots 212 through 221. The above to be addressed prior to DO. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Submit complete application for the vacation of the raw water line easement from Well #63 to Belcher Road. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . All wetland and stormwater retention areas must be designated as common areas for maintenance purposes. Identify on plans as common areas and indicate specific maintainance responsibilty to the future home owner association. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 22 0 0 Fire hydrant spacing is to be no more than 300' apart. Show on plans PRIOR TO DO Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building constriction being started. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO DO. It appears that all townhouses are to be 2 story. If there are to be any townhouses of 3 or more stories they will have to be provided with fire sprinkler systems. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO DO Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: ] . 8/1/05-Insure that all proposed grades do not change too drasticlly at trees to be preserved. A through review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. 9/26/05-The berm section A-A reflects a 4" high berm starting at the property line. This would conceivably bury every tree between the proerty line and the building foundation. This is why a through review must be performed at each tree to be preserved. Provide prior to DO. 2 . 8/l/05-It appears that some trees can be incorporated into the TOB of the retention ponds. Insure that proposed grades incorporate the trees critical root zones. Also insure that the proposed swales and berms do not impact the trees critical root zones. 9/26/05-It still appears that some trees designated to be pereserved have sever grade changes. The pond contours do not incorporate the trees critical root zones. A through review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. Revise prior to DO. 3. Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to Build Permit. Landscaping: 1 . Sheet LA3 - Part of fence setback adjacent to Laurelwood Drive on the left hand side is missing. Revise. 2. Sheet 34A/35 indicates that the "typical type 1 type curb section" are shown on the paving, grading and drainage sheets. Only Sheets 18 and 22'indicate the Type 1 curbing locations. Unclear why other portions of roadways, especially adjacent to proposed ponds and wetlands are also not indicated for type I curbing. The "Typical Double 60" RCP Culvert Crossing Section" on Sheet 34A indicates type 1 curbing, yet it is not shown on Sheet 19. It, however, appears that the type 1 curbing is shown on Sheets 7-11. Remove type 1 curbing from driveway area for Lot 131 (Shhet 10). Parks and Recreation: I . 9/16/05 - Site data table has been corrected to show wetland sq, ft. and acreage. Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Note: Site table needs to be corrected to show wetland sq ft and/or acres. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 23 Solid Waste: 1. Provide a berm along Countryside Boulevard adequate for City of Clearwater to perform maintenance along the ditch (minimum 10 feet), ensure that berm is incorporated within the easement. 2. Extend the easement to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (Suggest from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement). 3. It is the City of Clearwater belief that the pipe along Countryside Boulevard may be increased in diameter to meet allow for 10-year peak flow. Please ensure that development's internal culverts and piping would be sized sufficiently to allow for a an increase in flow as a result of replacing the upstream pipes without causing impacts. All of the above prior to DO. 9/26/05 - TJG Black barrel service utilizes right side pickup. Provide cul-de-sac turnarounds on the east end of Sienna Road to pick up Lots 57-62, the north end of Dolcetto Road to pick up Lots 175-180 (rather than the "Y's" shown) and to pick up Lots 17-20 on Nebbiolo Road on the west side of the development . With the Y's the driver will have to back down the street to service these lots, which increases the risk of accidents. 9/14/05 - TJG Turnarounds at end of Sierina and Dolletto Roads That solid waste & recycling service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 Traffic Engineering: 1 . No issues. Applicant has addressed prior traffic conditions. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 24 I 1 0 0 9/25/05 - WW Typical building layout provided on Sheet 7. Provide the information requested under 7/27/05 comment, including the minimum front setback from the unit property line. 7/27/05 - WW As part of the Site Plan package of Sheets 1-35 of 35, provide a typical building layout of the two building types (Venetian Bay and Bloomingdale), the same as has been done under the Landscape Plan typicals on Sheets LA-1 and LA-2, providing the width of the driveways (single-wide and double-side), the dimensions of units, providing the square footage of the unit types, the location and dimensions of any stoops and patios in the front or rear of the units, indicating whether any of these stoops or patios will be covered (or have the options of being covered by the unit purchaser), showing unit sidewalks, indicating the location, type and height of any unit fencing along unit property lines, indicating whether there are any accessory uses allowable for units (such as sheds, pools, spas, screen rooms, etc. - including where (setbacks) from unit lot lines such may be placed, showing all roof overhangs by dashed lines (with dimensions of length/width of overhang), showing all second floor balconies (if any), etc. 11/21/04 - WW Stoops and patios at the rear of units are structures by the Code and must meet setback requirements. Show all stoops and patios on all appropriate plans, including the dimension to the existing, outside property lines. If any patios are to be covered, indicate such. 9/25/05 & 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Address signage for development, by showing the location of freestanding sign(s), the setbacks from property lines, the relationship to sight visibility triangles and the relationship to landscaping. Provide a typical (general) front elevation with dimensions (width, length and height) and proposed sign colors. Note: The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available for residential projects. Need to meet general code requirements. Note: Any signs to be placed within easements will need to be approved by Engineering. 3 . 9/25/05 - WW Place underground the existing overhead electric line for the street lights along the frontage of Enterprise Road and at the intersection of Enterprise Road and Countryside Blvd. 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Per Section 3-1908.A, the City may require the undergrounding of existing above ground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way. Due to the frontage of this project along Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road, underground these facilities. 4. 9/25/05 - WW Any approval of this proposal will be conditioned on the approval of the vacation by City Council prior to the issuance of any permits. 7/24/05 - WW Need to submit a complete application for the vacation of the water line easement to the Engineering Department prior to scheduling this request for CDB. 5 . 9/25/05 & 7/24/05 - WW Sheet 22/35 - Indicate the landscape buffer on Sections G-G and H-H (like Section A-A on Sheet 18/35). 6. Sheets 12-16/35 - Preliminary Plat - provide the lot area for each lot (either in tabular form or on each lot). . 7. Sheet 9 - Unit 106 is indicated a 20-foot rear setback. Will Unit 106 be limited to a maximum 6'x10' patio/patio cover? If so, how will this Unit 106 be so restricted? Sheet 10 - Units 131-134 are only indicated a 6'x10' patio/patio cover. Same comment as above. 8. Existing signs indicated on Sheet 3 adjacent to Countryside Blvd. for the restaurant and the golf course must be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 9. Based on the building elevations submitted September 21, 2005, revise the Land Use Data Note #5 on Sheet 1 to indicate the height of the Venetian Bay Product at 23'-3" (midpoint of the pitched roof) and the height of the Bloomingdale Product at 24'-6 5/8" (midpoint of the pitched roof). Also revise Note #5 to indicate the Venetian Bay Product to be on the southern half of site, and the Bloomingdale Product to be on the northern half of the site. 10. Land Use Plan Amendment must be approved prior to approval of this Flexible Standard request. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 25 It . There is an existing PSTA bus stop on Countryside Blvd. right where Nebbiolo Road is proposed. What discussions have you had with PSTA regarding the relocation of this bus stop? Other: No Comments Notes: Prior to the issuance of a Development Order, submit five copies of revised plans satisfactorily addressing the DRC concerns/comments. Need to resubmit within six months or case will be declared withdrawn. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 26 It I e ;OM4 11:10 am Case Number: PLT2004-00017 -- 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD Owner(s): Executive Corp Clw Inc 2506 Countryside Blvd e Clearwater, F133763 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Beazer Homes Corp A Tennessee Corp MC 2630 S Falkenberg Road Riverview, Fl 33569 TELEPHONE: : 8 8 113-663-9002, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 44.2 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD AND ENTERPRISE ROAD AND ON THE EAST SIDE OF BELCHER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF S.R. 580 Atlas Page: 221A Zoning District: OS/R, Open Space/Recreation Dist Request: Preliminary Plat for a 240-lot, townhome residential subdivision. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Woodgate I & Ii Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33763 2345 Ashmore Drive TELEPHONE: 727-791-0848, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: jdelotto@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Woodgate Iii Neighbors Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33763 2360 Hazlewood Lane TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: CITY STAFF: WAYNE WELLS, NEIL THOMPSON, SCOTT RICE, LENNY RICKARD, RICK ALBEE APPLICANT/REP: TIM JOHNSON, JAYNE SEARS, ED MAZUR, O. C. CABRERA The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . The following to be addressed on the final plat: 1) Need a letter from the postmaster approving the proposed private street names prior to final plat submittal. 2) Sidewalk easements will be required for all proposed sidewalk segments that meander out of the proposed ingress/egress easement. 3) Private drainage easements required for all storm mains outside the ingress/egress easement. 4) Grant an additional easement for the existing 6" force main if force main meanders outside the existing 10 ft. drainage and utility easement. 5) Provide utility easement(s) for sanitary sewers or water lines not in common area or ingress/egress easement. Final plat to be recorded with Pinellas County prior to building permit. Environmental: 1 . See comments under FLS2005-08060. Fire: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Land Resources: I . See comments under FLS2005-08060. Landscaping: 1 . See comments under FLS2005-08060. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 19 • Parks and Recreation: • 1 . Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to final plat. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Deb Richter at 727-562-4817 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: See comments under FLS2005-08060. Solid Waste: 1 . See comments under FLS2005-08060. Traffic Engineering: 1 . Applicant to address comments of FLS2005-08060. Planning: 1 . See conditions under FLS2005-08060. Other: No Comments Notes: SEE FLS2005-08060 Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 20 t 11:10 am Case Number: FLS2005-080 -- 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD • Owner(s): Executive Corp Clw Inc 2506 Countryside Blvd Clearwater, Fl 33763 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Beazer Homes Corp. 2630 S. Falkenberg Road Riverview, F133569 TELEPHONE: 813-663-9002, FAX: 813-663-9493, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Timothy A Johnson, Jr., Esquire P O Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757-1368 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-462-0365, E-MAIL: timj@jpfirm.com Location: 44.27 acres located at the northwest corner of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road and on the east side of Belcher Road, approximately 500 feet south of S.R. 580 Atlas Page: 221 A Zoning District: OS/R, Open Space/Recreation Dist Request: (1) Flexible Standard Development to permit 240 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed. Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 240 townhome lots (PLT2004-00017); and (3) Vacation of a utility easement. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Woodgate Iii Neighbors Association(s): Clearwater, F133763 2360 Hazlewood Lane TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Woodgate I & Ii Association(s): Clearwater, F133763 2345 Ashm6re Drive TELEPHONE: 727-791-0848, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: jdelotto@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard, Rick Albee Applicant/Rep: Tim Johnson, Jayne Sears, Ed Mazur, O.C. Cabrera The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , 1. On the preliminary plat, Sheet 16 of 35, and all the appropriate sheets, move the proposed raw water easement to the south into the buffer off of lots 212 through 221. The above to be addressed prior to DO. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. Submit complete application for the vacation of the raw water line easement from Well #63 to Belcher Road. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 , All wetland and stormwater retention areas must be designated as common areas for maintenance purposes. Identify on plans as common areas and indicate specific maintainance responsibilty to the future home owner association. Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 21 Fire hydrant spacing is to be no more than 300' apart. Show on pla!RRIOR TO DO Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. A hard road surface able to support the weight of Fire Apparatus prior to any building construction being started. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO DO. It appears that all townhouses are to be 2 story. If there are to be any townhouses of 3 or more stories they will have to be provided with fire sprinkler systems. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO DO Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . 8/1/05-Insure that all proposed grades do not change too drasticlly at trees to be preserved. A through review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. 9/26/05-The berm section A-A reflects a 4" high berm starting at the property line. This would conceivably bury every tree between the proerty line and the building foundation. This is why a through review must be performed at each tree to be preserved. Provide prior to DO. 2 . 8/l/05-It appears that some trees can be incorporated into the TOB of the retention ponds. Insure that proposed grades incorporate the trees critical root zones. Also insure that the proposed swales and berms do not impact the trees critical root zones. 9/26/05-It still appears that some trees designated to be pereserved have sever grade changes. The pond contours do not incorporate the trees critical root zones. A through review must be completed at each tree to be preserved. Revise prior to DO. 3 . Provide a Tree Preservation Plan prepared by a certified arborist, consulting arborist, landscape architect or other specialist in the field of arboriculture. This plan must show how the proposed buildings, parking, stormwater and utilities impact the critical root zones (drip lines) of tree to be preserved and how you propose to address these impacts ie; crown elevating, root pruning and/or root aeration systems. Other data required on this plan must show the trees canopy line, actual tree barricade limits (2/3 of the drip line and/or in the root prune lines if required), and the tree barricade detail. And any other pertinent information relating to tree preservation. Provide prior to Build Permit. Landscaping: 1 . Sheet LA3 - Part of fence setback adjacent to Laurelwood Drive on the left hand side is missing. Revise. 2 . Sheet 34A/35 indicates that the "typical type 1 type curb section" are shown on the paving, grading and drainage sheets. Only Sheets 18 and 22 indicate the Type 1 curbing locations. Unclear why other portions of roadways, especially adjacent to proposed ponds and wetlands are also not indicated for type 1 curbing. The "Typical Double 60" RCP Culvert Crossing Section" on Sheet 34A indicates type I curbing, yet it is not shown on Sheet 19. It, however, appears that the type 1 curbing is shown on Sheets 7-11. Remove type 1 curbing from driveway area for Lot 131 (Shhet 10). Parks and Recreation: 1 . 9/16/05 - Site data table has been corrected to show wetland sq, ft. and acreage. Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Note: Site table needs to be corrected to show wetland sq ft and/or acres. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 22 1. Provide a be• ng Countryside Boulevard adequate for Cityof Clearwater to perform maintenance along the ditch (minimum 10 feet), ensure that berm is incorporated within the easement. 2. Extend the easement to provide for an accessible route for maintenance of the ditch along Countryside and the pipe at the northeast corner of the site (Suggest from Nebbiolo Road past Well #56 to easement). 3. It is the City of Clearwater belief that the pipe along Countryside Boulevard may be increased in diameter to meet allow for 10-year peak flow. Please ensure that development's internal culverts and piping would be sized sufficiently to allow for a an increase in flow as a result of replacing the upstream pipes without causing impacts. All of the above prior to DO. Solid Waste: 1 . 9/26/05 - TJG Black barrel service utilizes right side pickup. Provide cul-de-sac turnarounds on the east end of Sienna Road to pick up Lots 57-62, the north end of Dolcetto Road to pick up Lots 175-180 (rather than the "Y's" shown) and to pick up Lots 17-20 on Nebbiolo Road on the west side of the development . With the Y's the driver will have to back down the street to service these lots, which increases the risk of accidents. 9/14/05 - TJG Turnarounds at end of Sierina and Dolletto Roads 2 . That solid waste & recycling service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 Traffic Engineering: I . No issues. Applicant has addressed prior traffic conditions. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 23 0 0 9/25/05 - WW Typical building layout provided on Sheet 7. Provide the information requested under 7/27/05 comment, including the minimum front setback from the unit property line. 7/27/05 - WW As part of the Site Plan package of Sheets 1-35 of 35, provide a typical building layout of the two building types (Venetian Bay and Bloomingdale), the same as has been done under the Landscape Plan typicals on Sheets LA-1 and LA-2, providing the width of the driveways (single-wide and double-side), the dimensions of units, providing the square footage of the unit types, the location and dimensions of any stoops and patios in the front or rear of the units, indicating whether any of these stoops or patios will be covered (or have the options of being covered by the unit purchaser), showing unit sidewalks, indicating the location, type and height of any unit fencing along unit property lines, indicating whether there are any accessory uses allowable for units (such as sheds, pools, spas, screen rooms, etc. - including where (setbacks) from unit lot lines such may be placed, showing all roof overhangs by dashed lines (with dimensions of length/width of overhang), showing all second floor balconies (if any), etc. 11/21/04 - WW Stoops and patios at the rear of units are structures by the Code and must meet setback requirements. Show all stoops and patios on all appropriate plans, including the dimension to the existing, outside property lines. If any patios are to be covered, indicate such. 9/25/05 & 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Address signage for development, by showing the location of freestanding sign(s), the setbacks from property lines, the relationship to sight visibility triangles and the relationship to landscaping. Provide a typical (general) front elevation with dimensions (width, length and height) and proposed sign colors. Note: The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available for residential projects. Need to meet general code requirements. Note: Any signs to be placed within easements will need to be approved by Engineering. 3 . 9/25/05 - WW Place underground the existing overhead electric line for the street lights along the frontage of Enterprise Road and at the intersection of Enterprise Road and Countryside Blvd. 7/27/05 & 11/21/04 - WW Per Section 3-1908.A, the City may require the undergrounding of existing above ground utility facilities in the public rights-of-way. Due to the frontage of this project along Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road, underground these facilities. 4. 9/25/05 - WW Any approval of this proposal will be conditioned on the approval of the vacation by City Council prior to the issuance of any permits. 7/24/05 - WW Need to submit a complete application for the vacation of the water line easement to the Engineering Department prior to scheduling this request for CDB. 5 . 9/25/05 & 7/24/05 - WW Sheet 22/35 - Indicate the landscape buffer on Sections G-G and H-H (like Section A-A on Sheet 18/35). 6. Sheets 12-16/35 - Preliminary Plat - provide the lot area for each lot (either in tabular form or on each lot). 7. Sheet 9 - Unit 106 is indicated a 20-foot rear setback. Will Unit 106 be limited to a maximum 6'x10' patio/patio cover? If so, how will this Unit 106 be so restricted? Sheet 10 - Units 131-134 are only indicated a 6'x10' patio/patio cover. Same comment as above. 8 . Existing signs indicated on Sheet 3 adjacent to Countryside Blvd. for the restaurant and the golf course must be removed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 9. Based on the building elevations submitted September 21, 2005, revise the Land Use Data Note #5 on Sheet 1 to indicate the height of the Venetian Bay Product at 23'-3" (midpoint of the pitched roof) and the height of the Bloomingdale Product at 241-6 5/8" (midpoint of the pitched roof). Also revise Note #5 to indicate the Venetian Bay Product to be on the southern half of site, and the Bloomingdale Product to be on the northern half of the site. 10. Land Use Plan Amendment must be approved prior to approval of this Flexible Standard request. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 24 II . There is an existing kTA bus stop on Countryside Blvd. right where-Nebbiolo Road is proposed. What discussions have you had with PSTA regarding the relocation of this bus stop? Other: No Comments Notes: Prior to the issuance of a Development Order, submit five copies of revised plans satisfactorily addressing the DRC concerns/comments. Need to resubmit within six months or case will be declared withdrawn. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 25 • • Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 4:22 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-08060 - 2506 Countryside Blvd. Plans were submitted to address these comments but I was not able to completely verify their completed status. A brief review indicated that some were partially met. I hate to think of their response if you have sent the same comments that they thought they addressed. I will try to review as soon as possible. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 1:46 PM To: Albee, Rick Subject: FLS2005-08060 - 2506 Countryside Blvd. Rick - Just so you will know, in five of your comments you had "Prior to CDB." I have changed this to "Prior to DO," since this is now a FLS case. If any problem, let me know. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:15 AM To: Glenn, Tom Subject: RE: FLS2005-08060, 2606 Countryside Blvd. Tom - Thanks, I will put your comment into Permit Plan for you and they will need to deal with it. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Glenn, Tom Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 10:55 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-08060, 2606 Countryside Blvd. Wayne "Black barrel service utilizes right side pickup . Provide Cul-de-sac turnarounds on the east end of Sienna Road to pick up Lots 57-62 and the north end of Dolcetto Road to pick up Lots 175-180 rather than the "Y's" shown and Lots 17-20 on Nebbiolo Road on the west side of the development . With the Y's the driver will have to back down the street to service these lots which increases the risk of accidents. Wayne I feel we need these cul-de-sac's Tom Glenn Solid Waste Program Coordinator 727-562-4930 cell 727-224-7388 -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 10:00 AM To: Glenn, Tom Subject: RE: FLS2005-08060, 2606 Countryside Blvd. Tom - How about the following: "Black barrel pickup arm is on the right side of the trash truck next to the cab near the front of the truck. Trucks are manned by only one person and the majority of accidents occur when backing up these large trucks. Provide cul-de-sac turnarounds on the east end of Sienna Road to pick up Lots 57-62 and the north end of Dolcetto Road to pick up Lots 175-180 rather than the "Y's shown."? You have not said anything about the road configuration for Lots 17-20 on Nebbiolo Road on the west side of the development. Should this also be included? Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Glenn, Tom Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 7:01 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: FLS2005-08060, 2606 Countryside Blvd. In so many words OK need turnarounds don't want to back up anywhere with the side loaders as there is only one man per truck and the majority of accidents happen backing up these large trucks. Tom Glenn Solid Waste Program Coordinator 727-562-4930 cell 727-224-7388 ?_ d, 0 • -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 6:16 PM To: Glenn, Tom Cc: Melone, Donald; Rice, Scott Subject: FLS2005-08060, 2606 Countryside Blvd. Tom - At our pre-DRC meeting on Thursday, we looked at your comment on this project: "Turnarounds at end of Sierina and Dolletto Roads." I think we (me and Don Melone) understand the problem with the black barrel pickup by the trash truck and the reason for your comment. Could your comment be better worded as such: "Black barrel pickup arm is on the right side of the trash truck next to the cab near the front of the truck. Truck will need to back into the west part from the east part of Sienna Road to pick up Lots 57-62. There is insufficient room at the deadend to pick up the black barrel for Lot 62. Black barrel for Lot 153 (east part of Dolcetto Road) will need to be placed in the driveway for the truck to pick up the black barrel. Truck will need to back into the west part of Dolcetto Road to pick up Lots 175- 180 . There is insufficient room at the deadend to pick up the black barrel for Lot 180 (west part of Dolcetto Road). Provide adequate turn arounds (cul-de-sacs) for these two roads, extend the roads to provide sufficient area for the truck to back into (40 foot long truck) to be able to pick up black barrel (placed on their own lots [Lot 62 or Lot 180]) without backing over the curb into the grass or into a private driveway, or relocate dwelling units to other locations where black barrel pickup can be accomplished by the trash truck."? If this sounds better, and meets your intent of your comment, let me know and I will fix Permit Plan. If you could let me know Monday morning, I would appreciate it. Also, if I am off-base, let me know. I am trying to send out the comments to the applicant late Monday. Thanks. Wayne 0 , 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 6:17 PM To: Doherty, Steve Subject: FW: FLS2005-08060, 2606 Countryside Blvd. FYI since Don is on vacation. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 6:16 PM To: Glenn, Tom Cc: Melone, Donald; Rice, Scott Subject: FLS2005-08060, 2606 Countryside Blvd. Tom At our pre-DRC meeting on Thursday, we looked at your comment on this project: "Turnarounds at end of Sierina and Dolletto Roads." I think we (me and Don Melone) understand the problem with the black barrel pickup by the trash truck and the reason for your comment. Could your comment be better worded as such: "Black barrel pickup arm is on the right side of the trash truck next to the cab near the front of the truck. Truck will need to back into the west part from the east part of Sienna Road to pick up Lots 57-62. There is insufficient room at the deadend to pick up the black barrel for Lot 62. Black barrel for Lot 153 (east part of Dolcetto Road) will need to be placed in the driveway for the truck to pick up the black barrel. Truck will need to back into the west part of Dolcetto Road to pick up Lots 175-180. There is insufficient room at the deadend to pick up the black barrel for Lot 180 (west part of Dolcetto Road). Provide adequate turn arounds (cul-de-sacs) for these two roads, extend the roads to provide sufficient area for the truck to back into (40 foot long truck) to be able to pick up black barrel (placed on their own lots [Lot 62 or Lot 180]) without backing over the curb into the grass or into a private driveway, or relocate dwelling units to other locations where black barrel pickup can be accomplished by the trash truck."? If this sounds better, and meets your intent of your comment, let me know and I will fix Permit Plan. If you could let me know Monday morning, I would appreciate it. Also, if I am off-base, let me know. I am trying to send out the comments to the applicant late Monday. Thanks. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 8:43 AM To: Albee, Rick; Barker, Brian A.; Bertels, Paul; Buysse, Beverly A.; Carrier, Al; Clayton, Gina; Dougall-Sides, Leslie; Elbo, Bennett; Faessler, Heather; Finch, Terry; Glenn, Tom; Gluski, Roberta; Kader, Art; Kinney, Jason; Kurleman, Scott; Maran, Robert (Bob); Melone, Donald; Morris, William D.; Reid, Debbie; Rice, Scott; Rickard, Leonard; Schodtler, John; Shoberg, Elliot E.; Strong, Steve; Tefft, Robert; Thompson, Neil; Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLS2005-08060, 2506 Countryside Blvd. DRC members - You have recently received as part of the new DRC package for September 29, 2005, the above referenced case. This case was formerly FLD2004-11077, which was most recently reviewed at the August 4, 2005, DRC meeting. This project has been downgraded to a FLS case. This submission of FLS2005-08060 responds to DRC comments from the August 4th meeting. Please pull forward for this FLS case the following information from the FLD case: 1. Survey 2. Traffic Study Conditions in Permit Plan under the FLS2005-08060 case have been cloned over from the FLD file for ease of review. Hope this helps. Wayne Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:57 PM To: 'ctarapani@fldesign.com' Cc: Clayton, Gina Subject: FLD2004-11077, 2506 Countryside Blvd. Cyndi - Based on the fax you sent me regarding the location of the four-foot high fence/wall, the proposed locations and length of fence along the north and west property lines is acceptable. Along the west property line of Belcher Road, it is suggested to work the fence/wall into the buffer area rather than being adjacent to the internal roadway, so that landscaping can be placed on the inside of the fence/wall for the residents enjoyment also. Wayne AND AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT") is dated fykuA -ND, , 2006, effective as provided in Section 5 of this Agreement, and entered into between EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF g o 2:2 X CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corporation ("OWNER"), and the CITY OF z -1 M Z CLEARWATER, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida acting through " " c M h3 CITY ). its City Council ("COUNCIL"), the governing body thereof ( N X RECITALS: ;a Z? Co ? 0 Cn o X A. Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes, which set forth the o o Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act ("Act" ), authorize the CITY to z N 22 o enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable t? -4 0 o o, a c interest in real property located within the corporate limits of the City. N o -? ° B. Under Section 163.3223 of the ACT, the CITY has adopted Section 4-606 of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code ("CODE"), establishing procedures and requirements to consider and enter into development agreements. C. OWNER owns approximately 44.2 acres m.o.l. of real property ("PROPERTY") in the corporate limits of the City, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. D. OWNER or its successor, desires to develop the Property as a townhome community, consisting of not more than 280 units, generally conforming to the concept plan ("CONCEPT PLAN") shown on Sheet 1 of 2 on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein. E. The PROPERTY currently has a land use designation of Recreation/Open Space and is zoned OS/R. F. In order to develop the PROPERTY, consisting of 44.2 acres, with up to 280 residential units, OWNER has requested that the City place the following on the PROPERTY: (i) a land use designation of Residential Urban (7.5 units/acre) and (ii) a zoning designation of MDR (Medium Density Residential). G. The CITY and OWNER have determined that it would be mutually beneficial to enter into a development agreement governing the matters set forth herein and have negotiated this AGREEMENT in accordance with the CODE and the ACT. H. The CITY has found that the terms of, and future development orders associated with, this AGREEMENT are consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and the CODE. 1. On May 31, 2005, the CITY and the OWNER entered into a Development Agreement, which the parties wish to amend and restate in its entirety as set forth below. STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT In consideration of and in reliance upon the premises, the mutual covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound and in accordance with the ACT, agree as follows: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are true and correct and are a part of this AGREEMENT. SECTION 2. INCORPORATION OF THE ACT This AGREEMENT is entered into in compliance with and under the authority of the CODE and the ACT, the terms of which as of the date of this AGREEMENT are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT. Words used in this AGREEMENT without definition that are defined in the ACT shall have the same meaning in this AGREEMENT as in the ACT. SECTION 3. PROPERTY SUBJECT TO THIS AGREEMENT The PROPERTY Is subject to this AGREEMENT. SECTION 4. OWNERSHIP The PROPERTY is owned in fee simple by OWNER. SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE/DURATION OF THIS AGREEMENT 5.1 This AGREEMENT shall become effective as provided for by the ACT and shall be contingent upon 5.11 Obtaining final approval, and effectiveness of a land use designation of Residential Urban and a zoning designation of MDR as requested on the PROPERTY; and 5.1.2 Conveyance by OWNER of the PROPERTY to Beazer Homes Corp., a Tennessee corporation, or assigns. 5.2 This AGREEMENT shall continue in effect until terminated as defined herein but for a period not to exceed ten (10) years- SECTION 6. OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT 6.1 Obligations of the OWNER 6.1.1. The obligations under this AGREEMENT shall be binding on OWNER, its successors or assigns. 6.1.2. At the time of development of the PROPERTY, OWNER Will submit such applications and documentation as are required by law and shall comply with the City's CODE applicable at the time of development review. 6.1.3. The following restrictions shall apply to development of the PROPERTY: 6.1.3.1 The PROPERTY shall be developed substantially in conformance with the CONCEPT PLAN. The estimated population density and maximum building intensity are shown on the CONCEPT PLAN. The locations of the ponds and roads shown on the CONCEPT PLAN are approximate and may change as a result of the requirements of applicable regulatory agencies or other design considerations. 6.1.3.2 Building height shall not exceed 35 feet (two stories). 6.1.3.3 The architectural style of the townhomes to be constructed on the Property shall be substantially as shown on the renderings attached hereto as Exhibit "C." 6.1.3.4 The landscape buffering for the westerly side of the Property adjacent to existing residential development shall be substantially as described on Sheet 2 of 2 on Exhibit "B.". Building setbacks shall meet the requirements of the CODE and may be located in whole or in part within the landscape buffer. 6.1.3.5 The OWNER shall construct at its cost an extension of a turn lane on Countryside Blvd. as shown on the CONCEPT PLAN and shall post the security therefor as required by CODE §4-606 G.1.e. 6.1.3.6 The OWNER shall grant (i) a utility easement for water service five (5) feet on either side of the constructed water lines on the PROPERTY and (ii) simultaneously with vacation by the CITY of that portion of the easement recorded in O.R. Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, a replacement easement that relates to the remaining active wells operated by the CITY on the Property. 6.1.3.7. The project to be developed on the PROPERTY shall not have vehicular access to Laurelwood Drive. 6.1.3.8 On the west side of Enterprise Road, the OWNER shall extend north to the project entrance (+/- 400 feet) the existing SB to WB right turn lane at the Enterprise Road/Countryside Blvd. intersection, all at the OWNER's cost. 3 6.1.3.9. The OWNER shall buffer any residential structures located opposite the entrance to the Tampa Bay Water property to the east with a six foot high opaque fence, so as to diminish any adverse impact of headlights of vehicles exiting the Tampa Bay Water property. 6.1.3.9. Egress from the PROPERTY onto Enterprise Road shall permit only a right out movement. Ingress into the PROPERTY from Enterprise Road shall permit right in and left in movements. 6.1.4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the PROPERTY, Owner shall record a deed restriction encumbering the PROPERTY, which deed restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attomey (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) and which will generally describe the development limitations of this AGREEMENT. The deed restriction shall be perpetual and may be amended or terminated only with the consent of the CITY, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 6.2. Obligations of the City 6.21 Concurrent with the approval of this AGREEMENT, the COUNCIL shall promptly process amendments to the land use plan and zoning designation for the PROPERTY as set forth in Recital F above, all in accordance with the CODE. 6.2.2 City will approve site and construction plans for the PROPERTY that are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the CONCEPT PLAN and that meet the requirements of the CODE. 6.2.3 The City shall consider the vacation of the easement recorded in O.R. Book 4223, Page 1502, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 6.2.4 The final effectiveness of the redesignations referenced in Section 6.2.1. is subject to: 6.2.5.1 The provisions of Chapter 125 and 163, Florida Statutes, as they may govern such amendments; and 6.2.5.2 The expiration of any appeal periods or, if an appeal is filed, at the conclusion of such appeal. SECTION 7. PUBLIC FACILITIES TO SERVICE DEVELOPMENT The following public facilities are presently available to the PROPERTY from the sources indicated below. Development of the PROPERTY will be governed by the concurrency ordinance provisions applicable at the time of development approval. With respect to 4 transportation, the concurrency provisions for the proposed development have been met. 7.1. Potable water from the CITY. 7.2. Sewer service is currently provided by the CITY. 73. Fire protection from the CITY. 7.4. Drainage facilities for the parcel will be provided by OWNER. 7.5 Reclaimed water from the CITY, if available. 7.6. Solid waste from the CITY. SECTION 8. REQUIRED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERMITS The required local government development permits for development of the PROPERTY include, without limitation, the following: 8.1. Site plan approval(s) and associated utility licenses, access, and right-of-way utilization permits; 8.2. Construction plan approval(s); 8.3. Building permit(s); and 8.4. Certificate(s) of occupancy. SECTION 9. CONSISTENCY The CITY finds that development of the PROPERTY consistent with the terms of this AGREEMENT is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 10. TERMINATION 10.1. If OWNER's obligations set forth in this AGREEMENT are not followed in a timely manner, as determined by the City Manager, after notice to OWNER and an opportunity to be heard, existing permits shall be administratively suspended and issuance of new permits suspended until OWNER has fulfilled its obligations. Failure timely to fulfill its obligations may serve as a basis for termination of this AGREEMENT by the CITY, at the discretion of the CITY and after notice to OWNER and an opportunity for OWNER to be heard. 5 SECTION 11. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 11.1. Except in the case of termination, until ten (10) years after the date of this AGREEMENT, the PROPERTY shall not be subject to downzoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless the CITY has held a public hearing and determined: 11.1.1 That substantial changes have occurred in pertinent conditions existing at the time of approval of this AGREEMENT; or 11.1.2 This AGREEMENT is based on substantially inaccurate information provided by OWNER; or 11.1.3 That the change is essential to the public health, safety or welfare. SECTION 12. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW The failure of this AGREEMENT to address any particular permit, condition, term or restriction shall not relieve OWNER from the necessity of complying with the law governing such permitting requirements, conditions, terms or restrictions. SECTION 13. NOTICES Notices and communications required or desired to be given under this Agreement shall be given to the parties by hand delivery, by nationally recognized overnight courier service such as Federal Express, or by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows (copies as provided below shall be required for proper notice to be given): If to OWNER: Executive Corporation of Clearwater, Inc. 5260 South Landings Drive, Adel #704 Fort Myers, FL 33919 With copy to: Timothy A. Johnson, Jr., Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut St. Clearwater, FL 33756 If to CITY: City Council of City of Clearwater c/o City Manager 112 South Osceola Avenue P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756 Properly addressed, postage prepaid, notices or communications shall be deemed delivered and received on the day of hand delivery, the next business day after deposit with an overnight courier service for next day delivery, or on the third (3'd) day following deposit in the United States mail, certified mail, return receipt requested. The parties 6 may change the addresses set forth above (including the addition of a mortgagee to receive copies of all notices), by notice in accordance with this Section. SECTION 14. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. SECTION 15. MINOR NON-COMPLIANCE OWNER will not be deemed to have failed to comply with the terms of this AGREEMENT in the event such non-Compliance, in the judgment of the City Administrator, reasonably exercised, is a minor or inconsequential nature. SECTION 16. COVENANT OF COOPERATION The parties shall cooperate with and deal with each other in good faith and assist each other in the performance of the provisions of this AGREEMENT and in achieving the completion of development of the PROPERTY. SECTION 17. APPROVALS Whenever an approval or consent is required under or contemplated by this AGREEMENT such approval or consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. All such approvals and consents shall be requested and granted in writing. SECTION 18. COMPLETION OF AGREEMENT Upon the completion of performance of this AGREEMENT or its revocation or termination, a statement evidencing such completion, revocation or termination shall be signed by the parties hereto and recorded in the official records of the CITY. SECTION 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT (including any and all Exhibits attached hereto all of which are a part of this AGREEMENT to the same extent as if such Exhibits were set forth in full in the body of this AGREEMENT), constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof. SECTION 20. CONSTRUCTION The titles, captions and section numbers in this AGREEMENT are inserted for convenient reference only and do not define or limit the scope or intent and should not be used in the interpretation of any section, subsection or provision of this AGREEMENT. Whenever the context requires or permits, the singular shall include the plural, and plural shall include the singular and any reference in this AGREEMENT to OWNER includes OWNERS Successors or assigns. This AGREEMENT was the production of negotiations between representatives for the CITY and OWNER and the language of the Agreement should be given its plain and ordinary meaning and should not be construed against any party hereto. If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT is susceptible to more than one interpretation, one or more of which render it valid and enforceable, and one or more of which would render it invalid or unenforceable, such term or provision shall be construed in a manner that would render it valid and enforceable. SECTION 21. PARTIAL INVALIDITY If any term or provision of this AGREEMENT or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is declared invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this AGREEMENT, including any valid portion of the invalid term or provision and the application of such invalid term or provision to circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and shall with the remainder of this AGREEMENT continue unmodified and in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if such responsibilities of any party thereto to the extent that the purpose of this AGREEMENT or the benefits sought to be received hereunder are frustrated, such party shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT upon fifteen (15) days notice to the other parties. SECTION 22. CODE AMENDMENTS Subsequently adopted ordinances and codes of the CITY which are of general application not governing the development of land shall be applicable to the PROPERTY, and such modifications are specifically anticipated in this AGREEMENT. SECTION 23. GOVERNING LAw This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida without regard to the conflict of laws principles of such state. SECTION 24. COUNTERPARTS This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterparts, all of which together shall continue one and the same instrument. Section 25. TERMINATION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. The Development Agreement entered into by the parties on May 31, 2005, is hereby terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto executed this AGREEMENT the date and year first above written. [End of Substantive Provisions, Signature Page to follow.] 8 WITNESSES: EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida corpor ion B S. Lee Crouch President CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ?• ?-/? !? / By: - nk V. Hibbard illiam B. Horne II Mayor Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougall- id Assistant City Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY L"M OF LEE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2006, by S. Lee Crouch, as President of EXECUTIVE CORPORATION OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida jorporation, on?-b h If of the corporation, who ? is personally known to me or who ® produced as identification. ' GINGERBARIOMSEN Not, ubl ;R_ MY COMMISSION 4 DD 466230 Print Name: EXPIRES; Cj"? ??.1 Pr..'a lTMruNouryy ublwV 9 Countersigned: STATE OF FLORIDA CITY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3u , 2006, by Frank V. Hibbard, as Mayor of the City of Clearwater, Florida, who is personally known to me or who ? produced identification. ppo Y DIANE E MANNI MY COMMISSION # DD526033 IF 0 t- 0' EXPIRES: Mar. 6,2010 (407) 3864153 Florida Notary Savice.oom STATE OF FLORIDA ) CITY OF PINELLAS ) w 44At'u' ??- I Notary Public Print NameD,AVo The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2006, by William B. Horne II, City Manager of the City of Clearw ter, Florida, who J?K is personally known to me or who ? produced identification. 0V j+,, DIANE E MANNI MY COMMISSION #r DD526033 >a ??OFftO? EXPIRES: Mar. 6,2010 (407) 388-0153 Flodde Notary Servlce.carn Exhibits: A Legal Description of Property B Concept Plan C Building Elevations Notary Public` Print Name: "D 'q N£ 05/12/06 07:58 PNL . .......... . 45403.108701 #359033 v2 - Beazer/Countryside/Development Agreement (Amended) Deleted: 05112/06 04:53 PM 10 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land lying in Sections 30 and 31, Township 28 South, Range 16 East, City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida and being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the West 1/4 Corner of said Section 30; thence run South 0°19'55 East, along the .west line of said Section 30, for 444.65 feet; thence South 89°55'13" East for 50.01 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue South 89°55'13" East for 1558.45 feet to a point on the west line of "Dunedin Industrial Park" as recorded in Plat Book 64, Page 76, Records of Pinellas County,. Florida; thence South. 0°04'47" West for 937.36 feet to the southwest corner of said Plat; thence South 89°55'13" East, along the south line of said plat, for 247.55 feet to a point on the westerly right-of- way line of Enterprise Road; thence 16.61 feet along the said westerly right-of-way line and the arc of a curve that is concave to the northeast, having a radius of 895.00 feet, a chord length of 16.61 feet and a chord bearing of South 9°27'20" East to a point of compound curvature with a curve that is also concave to the northeast; thence 261.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 330.00 feet, a chord length of 254.33 feet and a chord bearing of South 32°39'10" East to a point of tangency; thence South 55°19'05" East for 345.77 feet. to a point of curvature of a curve of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 96.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 170.00 feet, a chord length of 94.82 feet and a chord bearing of South 39°07'31" East to a point of tangency; thence South 22°55'56" East for 143.70 feet to a point of curvature of a curve that is concave to the northeast; thence 286.62 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 405.00 feet, a chord length of 280.68 feet and a chord bearing of South 43°12'18" East to a point of reverse curvature with a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 102.23 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 250.00 feet; a chord length of 101.52 feet and a chord bearing of South 51 °45'54" East to a point of compound curvature with a curve that is concave to the west; thence 49.17 feet along the are of said curve having a radius of 30.00 feet, a chord length of 43.85 and a chord bearing of South 6°54'15" West to a point of tangency, the same point being on the northwesterly right-of-way line of Countryside Boulevard; thence South 53°51'32" West, along said right-of-way line, for 592.43 feet to a point of curvature of a curve that is concave to the southeast, thence 1059.47 feet along the are of said curve having a radius of 1960.00 feet, a chord length of 1046.62 feet and a chord bearing of South 38°22'24" West; thence, leaving said right-of-way line, North 67°06'44" West for 164.15 feet; thence North 10°30'36" West for 674.31 feet; thence North 62°54'47" West for 114.19 feet to a point on the arc of a curve that is concave to the northwest; thence 98.14 feet along the are of said curve having a radius of 490.00 feet, a chord length of 97.97 feet and a chord bearing of North 21°20'58" East; thence South 85°55'13" East for 382.97 feet; thence North 53°18'37" East for 254.00 feet; thence North 10°04'50" West for 228.53 feet; thence North 36°15'14" East for 111.61 feet; thence North 14°28'28" West for 444.10 feet; thence North 58°15'59" West for 446.79 feet; thence South 74°3452" West for 206.75 feet to a point on the arc of a curve that is concave to the southwest; thence 37.09 feet along the arc of said curve having a radius of 590.00 feet, a chord length of 37.08 feet and a chord bearing of North 17°13'11" West; thence North 62°12'34" East for 288.57 feet; thence North 3°59'27" West for 431.05 feet; thence North 44°05'26" West for-445.53 feet; thence South 79°28'45" West for 983.07 feet; thence North 0°19'55" West for 393.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGEND .a PMJM 5--wY 50 swnawaler mmaromm SyLLaa F?ateJ WetlLad Lledb hopmd Rm& "d c btu Pnpotad ?' Ral?kt Wall Pnpoted 4' HftM Fwa - l madoa A Proposed 4' 8e*M Feam - Lmadoa 6 pivnm"wy Lead Uat D" Fable hflkl A/M 617Aw cr.+ w.. LMSP.", I?rr?Yflrn w/rPrr/ry 1 pu rA Y mod.. r Y.A?br .rrl.?Y ?s 1 ili M•r Y awe*.r ?! Mri. r'M??Mrr..? ?Mb-W LMr r armor ?rro.. rirrw j ?/-rbM r irr....M+.lrlr+•Wr F ?rMNrrw ?r ?W i.rr.?rrb a. ar •?. „r,.,r..rr.rr a.r?r r rrr?r t.Y.. •r?y srarr.»rrr•r nrrr?wrr..vrrwrw+.r M rY.? arrrLa.o< / rrr..p. rrr .? r.ar.nw •w r A?w7 r •r.• .r Yl?tdr rd•r/ M iM 7 riMMi? ,. s...rw .• N_....w a r & 1w rr? W r•r r•q N V ? N.?rrM ?. r v l?/mar yr.'.r? rM PT.7 r,.r• rrr..r•.arrA.w. tjhft-W-4Y 9402 zer S CONCEPT PLAN rl M Lind m Vd• I?.OpY,.OrY„6 j I ?s ,?,,. ??r?r e?rtLL r :x 4'H1. 7s •LocedwA w y.rrnr es^o,YC,wsrttfa I mm e?n,er,. u,eonLL i ldfe eN ?MJ w.yl.rrm rrr w.?waw? 1 I Y6 ?e,elEONm ,?A'? CWeJRIYC[ ?L ?LL lO ? rr.r? ? Rerwv?s ? ?d ? Y ? Foee- f.ontleU E wey..,seur ,.e.ee e.ee. ,•.c..nmrs ...rnu v ft Fen Lautl= A .w.rre?m u."•s^-M dSetS eeasn?, wnr?wn.? m.rrrr ?mwrmwnru eoans nam ese„s can.am ?-,.onuawae.o 1 y wo?mvrawa I( I` I` Edra wle\ Wu ,yrrn.r.m rrr. nv®,usa*ncu I m?? flle0?! etle0 AMi ?Y. ,eCVRCOA'm ?LL I OWIY.ePQ m,.6ee„lYi ???? er: On COUNTRYSIDE EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSE CONCEPT PLAN - TYPICAL SECTIONS V HC Flee-LuUM E ?U...?na.rm d Hom er es Countryside Townhouse 4 UNIT VENETIAN ELEVATION N U W O H r-I H d old w a Roof Layout Rear EIevafion ca,2,pr ' "W INX-1-1 ill LLt. lOf Put ALTIr tl1IM?Ql?R a r11Y•:: 'r ,*W '%A%& A6 Ys?+ O\? M PORT. 10.VM. .MPW sots .le LMAlpr>. "ft sits ? .tr6be wOO+wrc .W M .N•. PWC% W. rUl¢•_s swap 0 p'AW .maul WW' ft'A tatur sacs wtaaw ,'" C9 wins 2W N4^6 "S - n- "- 7.7 7-7 77 Front Elevation Countryside Townhouse 6 UNIT VENETIAN ELEVATION N U 4-1 0 H N x ro U c? Aim; ..c r. z; '4f L si• Z'- r i Front Elevation RUT Elevation Room Layout -:: G? -0 W ORIGI M, / ` Aee, RECEIVED M ,tee . A, ? JAN 12 2006 4CA PLANNING DEPARTMENT' January 4, 2006 CITY OF CLEARWATER RE: Development of the golf course located at 2506 Countryside Blvd. FROM: Ronald Johnson 2460-A Laurelwood Dr. Clearwater, FL. 33763 (727) 669-5542 TO: All City Council Members & Planning Commission I have received a letter concerning the development of the property as mentioned above. I live within 200' of the proposed development. In fact I live on the P hole of that golf course and I have some concerns as stated below. I will be unable to attend any of the hearings for this proposed development. 1. The height of the entire project is proposed to be 35'. A concern to me because of the close proximity of this proposed development to the adjoining neighborhoods: The Laurelwood Condos. and The Village on the Green. I am proposing that the buildings abutting these properties should conform to the abutting buildings in the neighborhood which the overwhelming majority are 1 story. When I purchased my condo at the Laurelwood Condos, one of the primary considerations was the beautiful view I have of the golf course. Now with the possibility of having a 35' structure proposed for development I believe I am losing all the beauty I am enjoying now. If this proposal for development is approved, I would like to see only 1 story buildings built on the direct abutment to the 2 existing neighborhoods, instead of the 35' buildings being proposed. This sure would be more ascetic to the eyes and conform more to the existing neighborhoods. I believe that and new development should not be built if it will infringe on the surrounding existing neighborhoods, as I believe this one will do if all the building proposed are 35' in height. 2. Could you also consider the setback requirements for this new development as per the adjoining existing neighborhoods? The adjoining neighbors were here first and their quality of life should come before any new structures proposed to be built. I just don't think a 35'structure abutting the surrounding neighbors are justified. Thank you f r you consideration: Ronald Johnson 4 i FROM :JOYCE FAX NO. :758-6166 t. 12 2005 03:38PM P1 OCT 1 3 2005 ' ? ?E'CiN?.iQrvliililC) ? •,Y!4't C11 Y OF Gr »+*' x -TD : UJAVN P- M. W P L.L_S A Tc,P4 +PLP* NNF-P-rEE FROM". J o Yc E -D a T`AF i 10 - 1C-?- - DS FROM :JOYCE FAX NO. :758-6166 t. 12 2005 03:38PM P2 I0 -- a- os? FRam: TOYcE 1 A/' D£kSCtj D W NXP Or _ Q R a PER Lo LAUke-L wao.D DR R T R O w OCT 13 2005 1 '? lop"ICY rtEi r; 'AH00D ?+v?CES OF CLEAAtly d C?{? a rZc rY?, p? re? s S r o 1 ko be.r--ha -Drive- ?-?e.rick.yrsoa01.• i Ie, , 4 t?? 370 7S -TQ ?.. C re?-e?r1 ?-?, a r b or Rcl 4 %3 D 1 d A'? tly O rX ; 1 W 3-7138- 10'-R ,reze i ve.d c -o r re s p o nd e A C;e, (2? ? have: o Y? you'?' •? ?a ?? ?e? t a p rne_ A + p pro V a. k atet '5c> (jp Ca, o u nt- Y -? ro m o r d ?. pa ,?n rt`t y rtfiank you ? v -° 6 0 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C ITY OF C LEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 September 13, 2005 NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD (CASES FLS2005-08060/PLT2005-00017) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 2506 Countryside Blvd, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for (1) Flexible Standard Development to permit 240 attached dwellings (townhomes) in the proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) District, under the provisions of Section 2-303.A; (2) Preliminary Plat approval for 240 townhome lots (PLT2004-00017); and (3) Vacation of a utility easement. (Note: Subject property is 44.27 acres located at the northwest corner of Countryside Boulevard and Enterprise Road and on the east side of Belcher Road, approximately 500 feet south of S.R. 580). On September 29, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be September 29, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on September 29, 2005. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, [?,& Wayrl?e M. Wells, AICP, Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFlex Standard (FLS)IPending Casesl3 - Up for the Next DRCICountryside Blvd 2506 Costa Verde at Countryside (MDR) 9.29.05 DRC - WWILetter to Surrounding Property Owners 9.13.05.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYF HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BII.1. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" C V S 4987 FL 1 CVS DR WOONSOCKET RI 02895 - 6146 ASMUS, MARIE E 1155 LAZY LAKE RD E DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 4629 MOTTER, H M MOTTER, DONNA E 1127 OAKWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6549 DAVIS, DONNIE W DAVIS, CONNIE S 1162 OAKWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6548 BUZZELL, BRUCE E 537 MARJON AVE DUNEDIN 34698 - 7808 FL DENMAN, DAVID L 10186 BERGEN CT BOCA BATON FL 33428 - 4251 RAVELING, PAUL A THE RAVELING CHIROPRACTIC CENTER 1116 N BELCHER RD DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5631 HARDING, GRANT 484 REBSTOCK BLVD PALM HARBOR FL 34668 - 3558 COSPER, DAVID L INS AGENCY INC 1164 N BELCHER RD DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5679 WEBER, SCOTT C THE S & A HOLDINGS LAND TRUST 1101 BELCHER RD S STE B LARGO FL 33771 - 3356 OLDFIELD, JUSTIN G OLDFIELD, CARRIE L 1115 OAKWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6549 TATE, TIMOTHY J JR TATE, TONYA A 1151 OAKWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6549 KASPRZAK, STANLEY 31177 US HIGHWAY 19 N # 307 PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 4470 BUZZELL, DAVID A 1114 OAKWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6548 N BELCHER PROF CTR CONDO ASSN 1116 N BELCHER RD DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5631 COSPER, DAVID L INS AGENCY INC 1164 N BELCHER RD DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5679 LEAP CLEARWATER 3641 WEST KENNEDY BLVD STE A TAMPA FL 33609 - 2849 RHOADS, JEFFREY L THE RHOADS, KATHLEEN A THE PO BOX 861 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0861 ., cu ?vT?? s zac l?? BELAIR, TODD A BELAIR, CINDY L 1091 OAKWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6553 MOTTER, HARRY M MOTTER, DONNA E 1127 OAKWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6549 LEGG, THOMAS E LEGG, MADELINE J 2381 PALMWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6532 BUZZELL, BRUCE E 537 MARJON AVE DUNEDIN 34698 - 7808 FL LIGHT, DONALD W LIGHT, RITA K 1102 OAKWOOD DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 6548 RAVELING, PAUL A THE RAVELING CHIROPRACTIC CENTER 1116 N BELCHER RD DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5631 COSPER, DAVID L INS AGENCY INC 1164 N BELCHER RD DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 5679 CLEARWATER K M PO BOX 22799 HOUSTON TX 77227 - 2799 EXECUTIVE CORP CLW INC 2506 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1635 DECADE CO INCOME PROP TAMPA BAY WATER BIOMEDICAL APPL CLWR INC N19 W24130 RIVERWOOD DR # 2535 LANDMARK DR # 211 3242 HENDERSON BLVD STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3930 200 WAUKESHA WI 53188 - 1131 TAMPA FL 33609 - 3094 AMSOUTH BANK 3000 GALLERIA TOWER STE 1600 BIRMINGHAM AL 35244 - 2372 R F R AMERILIFE LTD 5130 MAIN ST # 6 NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - 2105 COUNTRYSIDE TWO CONDO ASSN 2555 ENTERPRISE RD CLEARWATER FL 00000 - ENTERPRISE DENTAL 5570 BEE RIDGE RD # C-2 SARASOTA FL 34233 - 1536 VOEGE, WALLACE J VOEGE, SUSAN A 2555 ENTERPRISE RD # F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1160 TSAGARIS, JOHN S DAILY, TIMOTHY C 2555 ENTERPRISE RD STE 10 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1150 BOBPIKE ENTERPRISES INC 2321 STATE ROAD 580 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1134 G L B LLC 3599 WOODRIDGE PL PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - 2435 MAYO, ROGER C MAYO, GERALDINE R PO BOX 1260 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1260 • LIMA LAKE INC PO BOX 5008 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 5008 LEVINE, BRUCE J BROWN, JOAN E 2402 BAYWOOD DR W DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2013 LOKEN FAMILY PTR LLP 1973 BONNIE CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3206 LOKEN FAMILY PTR LLP 1973 BONNIE CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3206 VOEGE, WALLACE VOEGE, SUSAN 3248 FOX HILL DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2310 CARIB-GULF CORP 1 SHORE DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2543 STEIN, NEIL S STEIN, MICHELLE F 2907 ELYSIUM WAY CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1414 PARKER, EDNA H THE 1537 GLEN HOLLOW LN N DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3224 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC PO BOX 1000 MOORESVILLE NC 28115 - DICKEY, STEPHEN F DICKEY, MARSHA S PO BOX 22997 TAMPA FL 33622 - 2997 MC CARTHY, EUGENE J MC CARTHY, LORETTA E 2505 ENTERPRISE RD CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1100 LOKEN FAMILY PTR LLP 1973 BONNIE CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3206 SUAREZ, RAMON I SUAREZ, TERESA M 2555 ENTERPRISE RD E CLEARWATER FL 33759 - LOKEN FAMILY PTR LLP 1973 BONNIE CT DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3206 PERSANTE & MC CORMACK 2555 ENTERPRISE RD STE 14 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1160 NIELSEN, SEVALD V THE NIELSEN, BARBARA S THE 2071 KIMBERLY DR DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 2706 COOK, RALPH W PO BOX 1073 DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 1073 DIOCESE OF ST PETERSBURG PO BOX 40200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33743 - 0200 ST MICHAEL'S HOUSING INC VILLAGE GREEN REC ASSN EGAN, KATHLEEN 2285 STATE ROAD 580 INC 2452 OAKLEAF DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1111 1 COUNTRYSIDE BLVD STE 300 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - CLEARWATER FL 33763 - BRUCE, ADELBERT M BRUCE, GERALDINE M 2456 OAKLEAF DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1233 SLADIN, ZELJKO ' SLADIN, ANA 2468 OAKLEAF DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1233 BANNON, RICHARD P 2480 OAKLEAF DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1233 LABERGE, EDWARD P 2467 BAY BERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1203 LUND, ROBERT A LUND, INGER M 2455 BAY BERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1203 NICHOLS, JANE B CHRISTY, NANCY N 2457 BAY BERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1201 MARSH, TONY MARSH, KAREN J 2460 BAY BERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1201 STRACHAN, ANGUS M STRACHAN, CATHERINE J 2216 FIR LANE CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1219 BESAW, GERARD 2223 BAY BERRY LN CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1208 0 HALL, JAMES D SR HALL, SONJA R 2460 OAKLEAF DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1233 BOWLING, BEATRICE 2472 OAKLEAF DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1233 PACKARD, GEORGE F 2475 BAY BERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1203 KELLY, WILLIAM N KELLY, TRUDY A 2463 BAY BERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - COPE, MARGARET A THE 2451 BAY BERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1203 WEIR, ROY E WEIR, C JEANNE 2453 BAY BERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1201 PAZAR, RALPH J 2463 BUTTONWOOD CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1223 ORR, JOHN C ORR, JEMIMA N 2220 FIR LANE CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1219 FLANARY, KATHERINE P 2219 BAY BERRY LN CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1208 • DENTNER, RICHARD P DENTNER, PHYLLIS M 2464 OAKLEAF DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1233 ANDRZEJEWSKI, GERTRUDE J 2476 OAKLEAF DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1233 MANDEVILLE, CLAIRE AUDREY MANDEVILLE, BRIAN JAMES 2471 BAY BERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1203 ANDERSON, JOSEPH V ANDERSON, JEAN H 2459 BAY BERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1203 DABKOWSKI, HILDA A THE 2461 BAY BERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1201 HOY, JOHN R SR HOY, SUE E 2456 BAY BERRY CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1201 KESSLER, MAE E 2221 FIR LANE CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1219 PALAMARA, LEO C THE PALAMARA, JOSEPHINE THE 2224 FIR LANE CT CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1219 METZ, SAMUEL A METZ, LOUISE P 2215 BAY BERRY LN CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1208 LAWSON, BARBARA A ROGUZ, CHESTER A HAVER, EDWARD F 2214 BAY BERRY LN ROGUZ, VERA M HAVER, BARBARA A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1208 2218 BAY BERRY LN 2222 BAY BERRY LN CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1208 CLEARWATER FL 33763 JANKOWSKI, LOU JANKOWSKI, ROSEANNA 2222 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 MILLER, EDWARD MILLER, ALICE G 2228 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 MARZI, ELMER W SR LEYDEN, GERTRUDE F 2234 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 PURTELL, DAVID J PURTELL, ELIZABETH M 2240 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 HAGERMAN, ARTHUR M HAGERMAN, MILDRED L 2246 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 KELLEY, CHARLES W KELLEY, ZELDA A 2252 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 COPPOLA, RICHARD M SR THE 2258 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 BURNBAUM, ANNIE L 2264 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 CARIDEO, ANGELO M 2269 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1141 ONOWAK, NANCY F 2224 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 BROWER, JOANN BROWER, GLEN E 2230 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 MELKO, HELEN 2236 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 LEGER, OSCAR J LEGER, DOROTHY M 2242 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 SAMARITANO, CLEMENT SAMARITANO, FRANCES 2248 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 HERBERT, JEAN B 2254 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 -1138 NORRIS, JOSEPH P NORRIS, ADELINE M 2260 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 KASTING, JOHN W KASTING, PAULINE B 2266 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 LAROCK, MICHAEL K LAROCK, ABLERTA M 2267 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1141 IOBYFIELD, JAMES K BYFIELD, MYRNA R 2226 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 OVERHOLT, DONALD M OVERHOLT, BARBARA A 3823 BOWEN RD TOLEDO OH 43613 - 4317 MARION, MARY E 2238 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 EASTON, DOUGLAS A 2244 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 34688 - 9010 HAMILTON, BETTY B THE 2250 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 HAVER, EDWARD F HAVER, BARBARA A 2222 BAYBERRY LN CLEARWATER FL 33763 - BRUNET, NORMAN BRUNET, EDNA 2262 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - SULLIVAN, MICHAEL A SULLIVAN, DOREEN L 2268 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1138 MOSIER, CARL E 2265 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1141 CVANIGA, DAVID W DAY, PATRICIA I LEVINE, PHYLLIS CVANIGA, GLORIA J 2625 SYCAMORE DR 2621 SYCAMORE DR 2257 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1 143 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1143. CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1141 LASKEY, REGINALD THE 0 WARMAN, JOHN NW JR MILLER, RAYMOND A 37848 N LAUREL PARK DR WARMAN, MARY J MILLER, MARY E LIVONIA MI 48152 - 2667 2613 SYCAMORE DR 2609 SYCAMORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1143 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1143 CONSTANTINE, JOHN P CONSTANTINE, CHARLENE M 2608 SYCAMORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1142 KLEIN, JERRY W KLEIN, YVONNE 2612 SYCAMORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33761 - WENGER, NANCY N 2616 SYCAMORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1142 LAMBERTON, DONALD A LAMBERTON, IRENE 2620 SYCAMORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1142 GIBSON, PETER G GIBSON, MARJORY 2241 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1140 ALFRED, FRANCES M 2635 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1108 PORTER, MICHAEL S PORTER, PAULA G 2623 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1108 FRATI, BLANCHE L 2622 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1107 THORPE, RAY E 2221 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1139 BALL, NORMAN E BALL, FRANCES L 9101 UPTON AVE S BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 - 2149 DANTINNE, DAVID A DANTINNE, ANNE 2624 SYCAMORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1 142 LEIN, MURIEL H 2235 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1 140 COLVILLE, JUNE V 2631 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1108 GIDEL, WAYNE D THE GIDEL, MARY A THE 2619 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1108 BUSCH, ROBERT G BUSCH,SUSAN 2626 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1107 LITTLE, ROBERTA F THE 2219 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1139 SIRICO, ARTHUR SIRICO, CAROL A 2213 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 -1139 DE GIORGIO, JOHN DE GIORGIO, CLORINDA A 35 WHITTIER DR THORNWOOD NY 10594 - 1715 1NFINGER, WINFRED A 1NFINGER, ELIZABETH M 2231 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1140 JACZKO, THERESA JACZKO, DAVID A 2627 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1108 SPRINGER, DOLORES 2618 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1107 PATON, DONALD L PATON, ELAINE M 2630 HEMLOCK DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1107 PETITPREN, CLARENCE J PETITPREN, ROSE 2217 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1139 THUMM, NANCY L 2201 SEQUOIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1139 KOHNHORST, WILBUR E GRIPPO, VINCENT PRYCE, MARIE KOHNHORST, MARY A GRIPPO, CAROL PRYCE, ROBERT P JR 2633 LAURELWOOD DR 56 AMSTERDAM AVE 2625 LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1232 HAWTHORNE NY 10532 - 1731 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1232 KOROSKI, EDWARD A THE 2621 LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1232 MATHEISEN, EDWARD L 2494 LAURELWOOD DR # IA CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1533 VELAZQUEZ, JOSE L 935 PINE HILL RD PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 3014 BROWN, HELEN M 2498 LAURELWOOD DR # 2-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1561 FISHER, JEANETTE 2502 LAURELWOOD DR # 3-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1228 THORNBURGH, ROBERT T THORNBURGH, EVELYN G 2506 LAURELWOOD DR # 4-13 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1263 KING, L JAMES KING, JOCQUELINE M 6610 HILLSIDE CT CELINA OH 45822 - 8899 HARRISON, FAY A 89 BIRCH ST CLOSTER NJ 07624 - 1702 BATTISTA, JOHN BATTISTA, BARBARA PO BOX 285 MASSAPEQUA NY 11758 - 0285 SZYNSKI, ALLEN J SZYNSKI, JOYCE A 48431 MILONAS DR SHELBY TWP MI 48315 - 4302 VERCAIGNIE, LUCIEN A VERCAIGNIE, LEA M 2494 LAURELWOOD DR # 1-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1533 BRADNER, ROBERT H BRADNER, WANDA L 2498 LAURELWOOD DR # 2-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1561 ELK, JOHN J GRESS, RONALD L PO BOX 159 SALEM NJ 08079 - 0159 BERGSTRAESSER, CAROLE H THE 212 S MAPLE AVE #27 OAK PARK IL 60302 - 3029 PICCIURRO, ANTHONY J 2506 LAURELWOOD DR # 4C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - HOWARTH, MAXINE J 2510 LAURELWOOD DR # 5-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1265 CLAIR, WILLIAM T 2514 LAURELWOOD DR # 6-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1264 COLP, GERALD R COLP, NORMA 368 S PATTERSON BLVD DAYTON OH 45402 - 2845 VILLAGE ON THE GREEN CONDO ASS 2568-A LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1270 MAPLE, SCOTT BRYSON, TERRI J 6246 GLENROCK CT TOLEDO OH 43615 - 2551 HESS, SUSAN R 2498 LAURELWOOD DR # 2-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1561 BAKER, ERMA W 2502 LAURELWOOD DR # 3-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1228 KIRK, JAMES R KIRK, GLORIA S 2506 LAURELWOOD DR # 4A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1263 HUGHES, CATHERINE M 2510 LAURELWOOD DR # 5A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1265 MC GEEVER, JUNE D 2514 LAURELWOOD DR # 6-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1264 STADMAN, CHARLES J STADMAN, MARIE T 2526 LAURELWOOD DR # 7-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1266 COLEMAN, STORMY W 2530 LAURELWOOD DR # 8 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1267 JAFFE, LEILA H STEFANOS, ROSE M MYHILL, DONALD L 2530 LAURELWOOD DR # 8-B 2530 LAURELWOOD DR # 8-C MYHILL, MARY C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1267 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1267 2540A LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 SWANSON JOHN R 0BECKMAN, JAMES H *CLARRIDGE, JUDITH K 6 BUCKINGHAM RD BECKMAN, MARGUERITE L 2544 LAURELWOOD DR # l0A WHIPPANY NJ 07981 - 1207 2540 LAURELWOOD DR # 9-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1269 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1268 O'NEILL, STANLEY J O'NEILL, PHYLLIS J 2544 LAURELWOOD DR # 10-13 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1269 SHADE, LESLIE N JR SHADE, SHARON A PO BOX 16894 CLEARWATER FL 33766 - 6894 HENRY, JAMES R HENRY, MARY A 2568 LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1270 LOWERY, GEORGE C LOWERY, MADGE F 3124 CORAL DR HOBART IN 46342 - 3524 KIBEL, GERALDINE M 2572 LAURELWOOD DR # 12-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1285 ARBUCKLE, NED C ARBUCKLE, ANN P 2576 LAURELWOOD DR # 13-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1271 COFFEE, RALPH E 2580 LAURELWOOD DR # 14-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1260 GAFFNEY, EUGENE M GAFFNEY, MILDRED J 2580 LAURELWOOD DR # 14-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1260 STOGNER, JEAN A 2584 LAURELWOOD DR # 15-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1272 THOMPSON, ALLEN D THOMPSON, ANA M 2045 LITTLE NECK RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 1340 WILSON, MARGARET R WILSON, JOAN W 2568 LAURELWOOD DR # 11-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1270 BILLINGS, ALICE 2572 LAURELWOOD DR # 12-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1285 RYAN, FRANCES T 2576 LAURELWOOD DR # 13-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1271 PETERS, ORA J 2580 LAURELWOOD DR # 14-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1260 MOSER, NATHAN P MOSER, HARRIET J 2584 LAURELWOOD DR # 15-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1272 BELL, BERYL 2588 LAURELWOOD DR # 16-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1275 LAATSCH, JANET R 2592 LAURELWOOD DR # 17-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1273 PATELLI, LOUIS T PATELLI, CAROLE S 2572 LAURELWOOD DR # 12-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1285 LUSCH, RICHARD C 2572 LAUREKWOOD DR # 12-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - RUDY, JOHN 2576 LAURELWOOD DR # 13C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1271 LIVINGSTON, BARBARA M DAVIS, LAURA 2580 LAURELWOOD DR # 14-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1260 LIESCH, GRACE L THE 2584 LAURELWOOD DR # 15-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1272 GRANDOFF, BETTY 2588 LAURELWOOD DR # 16-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1275 SBRILLI, EMILY H 2592 LAURELWOOD DR # 17-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1273 PICKERING, BARBARA L FAVREAU, GLORIA URSO, MARIE THE 3924 GUNNIN RD 2596 LAURELWOOD DR # 18-A 2596 LAURELWOOD DR # 18-B NORCROSS GA 30092 - 1952 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1261 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1261 V IV IANO, NINO G THE • PICKING, NICOLLE • BISHOP, LLOYD 2596 LAURELWOOD DR # 18-C - 2596 LAURELWOOD DR # 18-D BISHOP, DORA B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1261 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1261 2600 LAURELWOOD DR # 19-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1274 SYLVES, ROBERT O SYLVES, JOANNE 2600 LAURELWOOD DR # 19-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1274 DUNN; DAVID L DUNN, DAVID A 2600 LAURELWOOD DR # 19-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1274 ALEXANDER, ROBERT W 2481 OAKLEAF LN # 20A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1237 LYNES, SARAH ANN 3592 OAKLEAF LN # 20B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1237 CABRI, DIANA D TRUST CABRI, DIANA D THE 321 GROVE AVE HIGHWOOD IL 60040 - 1501 MARKEY, JOHN P MARKEY, CATHERINE C 18 FAIRFIELD AVE EARLEVILLE MD 21919 - 1220 MAJER, MARILYN L 2497 OAKLEAF LN # 22C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1279 DEHNEL, ROBERT E DEHNEL, GAIL S 2498 OAKLEAF LN # 23C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1239 WHITTEN, THEODORE L WHITTEN, MURLE E 2505 OAKLEAF LN # 24B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1242 BURTI, JOHN C BURTI, ANGIE 125 W 24TH ST BAYONNE NJ 07002 - 1740 PAPADAKOS, CATHERINE 2481 OAKLEAF LN # 20C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1237 STARRY, THEODORE TRUST KOLLER, DONNA BEN STARRY T/A TRESS/FL-0135 PO BOX 40062 JACKSONVILLE FL 32231 - 0062 PELO, MILDRED 2497 OAKLEAF LN # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - LEVY, LEE L 2498 OAKLEAF LN # 23A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1239 MILLER, STEVEN J 15329 HARBOR DR MADERIA BEACH FL 33708 - 1820 MC WHIRT, JOYCE L MC WHIRT, WILLARD W 17673 SE 119TH AVE RD SUMMERFIELD FL 34491 - 7878 PRISCO, ARNOLD P PRISCO, JOSEPHINE P 2506 OAKLEAF LN # 25-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1243 FINEMAN, LAWRENCE 2481 OAKLEAF LN # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1237 LAUZON, THERESA 2489 OAKLEAF LN # 21C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1238 THOMAS, ELDA 2497 OAKLEAF LN # 22B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1279 VOGEL, LINDA S 2498 OAKLEAF LN # 23B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1239 STULTZ, BETTY L 2505 OAKLEAF LN # 24A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1242 RAINONE, ILENE M 2505 OAKLEAF DR # 24D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1242 CORRELL, CINDA J 2506 OAKLEAF LN # 25-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1243 JENSEN, MARILYN HALL, EVERETT E EDIE, LORRAINE F 2506 OAKLEAF LN APT D HALL, FERN Z 2513 OAK LEAF LN # B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1243 2513 OAKLEAF LN # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1280 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1280 CURRIER, GARY E CURRIER, IRENE L 2513-C OAKLEAF LN CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1280 SAUNDERS, JOSEPH F SAUNDERS, PATRICIA M 2521 OAKLEAF LN # 28-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1245 HERY, ALICE 2537 OAKLEAF LN # 32-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1248 MEISSNER, RUTH 2543 OAKLEAF LN # 34-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1224 KELLY, CATHERINE A THE LAND TRUST NO 792-2549 620 EDENVILLE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6338 CARDONE, FRANK CARDONE, LOIS 116 CHOIR LN WESTBURY NY 11590 - 5724 SILVERNAIL, DOUGLAS SILVERNAIL, CAROL 2561 OAKLEAF LN # 40A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1283 BENTLEY, MARLENE 2567 OAKLEAF LN # 41-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1250 ELIAS, FREDERICK J SASSO, DOREEN 6016 KENNETH RD FORT MYERS FL 33919 - 1625 ?HODGE, JAMES H 10BROGGINI, JAMES A THE SILVERNAIL, DONALD P 11 CABOT ST 2521 OAKLEAF LN # 281 BARRE VT 05641 - 2606 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1245 MURRAY, DONALD I MURRAY, CARMEN C 75 COLBY ST BARRE VT 05641 - 2705 YOUNG, DAVID ALBERT 2537 OAKLEAF LN # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - YOUNGS, MICHAEL E 13737 LANCASTER DR SHELBY TWP MI 48315 - 3834 ROBERTS, RENEE M 2543 OAKLEAF LN # B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1224 WILSON, LENA A 2549 OAKLEAF LN # 36B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1281 DOUBLE, ARTHUR L 2555 OAKLEAF LN # 38B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1282 IMMEL, ELENA H 2561 OAKLEAF LN # 40-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1283 DUBOIS, PIERRE DUBOIS, JEANNE M 2567 OAKLEAF LN # 41 B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1250 MACH, JOSEPH JR MACH, JOSEPH III 2227 W FARWELL AVE # lE CHICAGO IL 60645 - 4809 HAZELTON, NANCY L 2537 OAKLEAF LN # 32-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1248 BYFORD, RUTH M 2543 OAK LEAF LN # 34C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1224 TEDESCO, DOLORES THE 69 LINCOLN AVE # 3N RIVERSIDE IL 60546 - 2535 OSTRANCER, SUSAN L HOPKINS, CHARLES B 2555 OAKLEAF LN # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1282 LANGMAN, MARION M THE 2561 OAKLEAF LN # 40C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1283 BIBAS, SOPHIE V 2567 0AKLEAF LN # 41-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1250 VENNE, URSULA E 2579 BAY BERRY DR # 42B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1206 WORRALL, LORETTA EVERS, JOHN L DELEO, FRANK 2579 BAY BERRY DR # 42C EVERS, NANCY E DELEO, STELLA CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1206 2579 BAY BERRY DR # 42D 2585 BAY BERRY DR # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1206 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1207 PANTIN, JANE 2585 BAY BERRY DR # 43-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1207 VILLAGE ON THE GREEN CONDO III 2557 LAURELWOOD DR UN 10F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1225 EATON, SUE ANNE EATON, FRANKLYN E 12552 CAMPBELLS PT DR SACKETS HARBOR NY 13685 - 3112 BAKER, DYAN L THE 3186 EAGLES LANDING CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2836 WILLIAMS, ROBERT L WILLIAMS, RITA G 2502 ROYAL PINES CIR # 5C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1164 SOLEY, DONALD SOLEY, LINDA S 2529 LAURELWOOD DR # 6-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1222 LA BARGE, DARYL H 2535 LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - SOFIANOS, ANTONIOS SOFIANOS, SARAH P 2585 BAY BERRY DR # 43C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1207 EBURG, H THOMAS EBURG, BARBARA A 6002 ROLAND AVE BALTIMORE MD 21210 - 1112 CORBETT, WILLIAM J CORBETT, DOLORES J 2508 ROYAL PINES CIR # 4-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1199 FILES, BARBARA M 2502 ROYAL PINES CIR # 5-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1164 WRIGHT, PHYLLIS J 2529 LAURELWOOD DR # 6A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1222 FITZSIMONS, CAROL L FITZSIMONS, DANIEL A 2529 LAURELWOOD DR # 6-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1222 PUTLAK, PATRICIA J 2535 LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1226 ANTAYA, GASTON N PAROW, GEORGE V 3020 BLUFF BLVD PAROW, BARBARA A HOLIDAY FL 34691 - 9709 2490 BAYBERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - BALDETTI, SUSAN 2541 LAURELWOOD DR #-8-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1227 MONTGOMERY, THOMAS G MONTGOMERY, LAURA J 3021 KEY HARBOR DR SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 5110 • POLAK, KENETH B THE POLAK, SHIRLEY R THE 2585 BAY BERRY DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1207 EATON, DAVID C MUELLER, VIOLET E 2507 ROYAL PINES CIR # 2-H CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1158 TREEN, MICHAEL H TREEN, CHRISTINE P 2508 ROYAL PINES CIR # 4-13 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1199 ANDREWS, MARTIN J ANDREWS, LORRAINE P 2502 ROYAL PINES CIR # 513 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1164 KARR, SHIRLEY A 2529 LAURELWOOD DR # 6-13 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1222 OLESZEK, JOHN 2535 LAURELWOOD DR # 7-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1226 LEONE, MERLE W LIVING TRUST LEONE, MERLE W BEN 2535 LAURELWOOD DR # 7-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1226 LEWIS, RUTH E 2541 LAURELWOOD DR # 8-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1227 COOK, EDWARD J COOK, GLORIA M 2545 LAURELWOOD DR # 9B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1259 BOULIA, ARTHUR J MESSIG, FRANCIS A DUDLEY, WILLIAM J BOULIA, GERALDINE D 200 FIDDLECREEK RIDGE RD DUDLEY, MARGARET M 2545 LAURELWOOD DR # 9C WENTZVILLE MO 63385 - 5726 2557 LAURELWOOD DR # 10A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1259 CLEARWATER FL 33763 MECH, JOANN M MONTGOMERY, MAUREEN M 2557 LAURELWOOD DR # IOB CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1225 TEWS, CAROL TEWS, CARL J 2557 LAURELWOOD DR # IOE CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1225 MILLER, HERBERT D MILLER, HARRIET R 2569 LAUREL WOOD DR # 1113 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1262 MAYNER, JEROME F MAYNER, MAE E 2550 ROYAL PINES CIR # 12A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1122 MC MANAMON, WILLIAM J MC MANAMON, CARMELA J 2550 ROYAL PINES CIR # 12-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1 122 THOMPSON, DOROTHY M 2556 ROYAL PINES CIR # 13-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1 124 AUGUSTIN, ROSE M 2561 ROYAL PINES CIR # 14-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1125 DICKERSON, SCOTT DICKERSON, HELEN 17 ASPEN RD SICKLERVILLE NJ 08081 - 3246 BEGLEY, CATHERINE A 16 MOSBEY CT STERLING VA 20165 - • PIERCEY, MARY L THE 2 5 5 7 LAURELWOOD DR # l OC CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1225 DIAMANDIS, GEORGE DIAMANDIS, BARBARA J 2557 LAURELWOOD DR # IOF CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1225 ARLICH, LILO H 2569 LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1262 ROSSI, CARL A ROSSI, IRMA A 2550 ROYAL PINES CIR # 12B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1 122 RIDLEY, RUSSELL E RIDLEY, PATRICIA R 2556 ROYAL PINES CIR # 13A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1124 PERKIE, NORBERT W PERKIE, ALVINA J 2556 ROYAL PINES CIR # 13D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1124 WILLIAMS, FRANCES N 2561 ROYAL PINES CIR # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1125 RONACHER, JAMES M 2561 ROYAL PINES CIR # 14-F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - DUNK, LUELLA S 2555 ROYAL PINES CIR # 15-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1123 NEWELL, JOHN A 2557 LAURELWOOD DR # 10-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1225 COVEY, WILLIAM W COVEY, DOROTHY A 2569 LAURELWOOD DR # 11 A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1262 SKAGER, ALVIN R SKAGER, LAVAUGHN 2569 LAURELWOOD DR # I ID CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1262 LOWNIE, FLORENCE D 2550 ROYAL PINES CIR # 12C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1122 ERICKSON, EDNA J 2556 ROYAL PINES CIR # 13B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1124 SHIMEK, DAVID F SHIMEK, RUTH A 2561 ROYAL PINE CIR # 14-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1125 SEYMOUR, LORETTA M R 2561 ROYAL PINES CIR # 14-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1125 FAUVELL, ALFRED J FAUVELL, LINDA E 440 PENNISULA DR ORIENTAL NC 28571 - DI VETTIMO, ANGELA S 2555 ROYAL PINES CIR # 15B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1123 MOSHONAS, ANITA T DE LORENZO, THERESA KNIGHT, BRIAN A 2555 ROYAL PINES CIR # 15C 2555 ROYAL PINES CIR # 15D 2555 ROYAL PINES CIR # 15E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1123 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1123 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1123 TOFT, JOAN 2555 ROYAL PINES CIR # 15F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1123 GLEN, GORDON W GLEN, BARBARA A 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 EVANS, PATRICIA R 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 COBBS, SAMUEL E COBBS, BENNIE M 1224 HUNTERS DR STONE MOUNTAIN GA 30083 - 2545 SALATA, JEROME J 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16-J CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 7 GABLES MGMT TRUST STALLSMITH, WAYNE L BEN 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - BOTT, MARILYN E 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # 17-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 KENNEDY, WALTER C KENNEDY, M ESTELLE 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # 17-G CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 HAGUE, CURTIS A JR 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # J CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 STEPHENS, EDITH J THE 2555 ROYAL PINES CIR # 15G CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1123 STULER, GWEN 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1 121 GELSOMINO, HELEN THE 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16-E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 VAN DER HOEF, JERRY M O, SEUNG-JUN 1103 CATALPA ST TUSEUMBIA AL 35674 - 4001 LEWIS, HELEN E LEWIS, GARY W 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16-K CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 BLACHOWICZ, DORIS 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # 17-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 MAY, ROBERT W MAY, CAROL J 13050 WEST BLUEMOUND RD ELM GROVE WI 53122 - 2661 RENFROE,PEQUEETA 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # 17-H CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 OLIVA, ANTHONY J OLIVA, ELLEN P 103 MAXIM DR HOPATCONG NJ 07843 - 1900 • VOLLARO, JOSEPH T VOLLARO, PATRICIA A 2555 ROYAL PINES CIR # 15H CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1123 MANGUS, JOHN E 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 LEMBO, LEO LEMBO, ROSARIA 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 CLUNEY, LAWRENCE J CLUNEY, LOUISE J 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 161 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 CODY,SUZANNE 2549 ROYAL PINES CIR # 16L CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1121 OLSON, MARIE B OLSON, LOUISE F 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # 17-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 TORRENCE, LIDA A THE 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # 17-F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 STOLIKER, DANIEL P STOLIKER, EMMI 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # 17-I CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 DAVIS, JERALD R DAVIS, CAROLYN 2543 ROYAL PINES CIR # 17L CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1119 KONEY, GILBERT SMACK, CHARLES W JR TRICKEY, PATRICIA STANCEL, RYAN 2544 ROYAL PINES CIR # 18-B MC KELLY, ANN 28097 LEMONWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1156 2544 ROYAL PINES CIR # 18-C MENIFEE CA 93720 - 3695 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1156 PARR, DAN E THE 0MOYNIHAN, MARION E 16LINN, JULIA A 2544 ROYAL PINES CIR # 18-D 2537 ROYAL PINES CIR # 19-A 522 SCOTLAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1156 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1154 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7019 OSS, JEROME T JR 3121 CARL RD FRANKLIN TN 37064 - 9536 WELCH, HAROLD W ' 2537 ROYAL PINES CIR # 19-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1154 HERBIG, HARRY H HERBIG, JOAN H 763 BALDWIN LN ROMEOVILLE IL 60446 - 5255 GILLESPIE, GEORGE F JR GILLESPIE, JANET M 2537 ROYAL PINES CIR # 19-F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1154 SCOURTAS, CHARLES C 2537 ROYAL PINES CIR # 19-I CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1154 ELLEFSEN, EVELYN A THE 5 OAKBROOK CLUB DR # N 106 OAK BROOK IL 60523 - 1325 KLEIN, LEONA 2538 ROYAL PINES CIR # 20-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1161 BALL, DAVID E SR BALL, JANE M 2532 ROYAL PINES CIR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1116 MULDER, JEAN L 2532 ROYAL PINES CIR # 21-E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1116 WETHERBEE, SHIRLEY T 2526 ROYAL PINES CIR # 22-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1162 DREW, WALTER F DREW, MARY A 2537 ROYAL PINES CIR # G CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1117 JOHNSON, RUTH A 2537 ROYAL PINES CIR # 19-J CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1154 THOMSON, RUTH M 2538 ROYAL PINES CIR # 20-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1161 GRAN, LAURENCE GRAN, JUDITH 2538 ROYAL PINES CIR # 20-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - GARDNER, JAMES A GARDNER, CARON F 2532 ROYAL PINES CIR # 21-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1116 TOROK, GEORGE E 2532 ROYAL PINES CIR # 21-F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1116 DUNN, AVI DUNN, GLORIA 2526 ROYAL PINES CIR # 22-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1162 WISCHER, TERRY R 58 EAGLE VIEW LN FORT THOMAS KY 41075 - 1473 KAVANAUGH, RALPH G KAVANAUGH, ROSE M 2537 ROYAL PINES CIR # 19-K CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1154 PETERS, PATRICIA C 2538 ROYAL PINES CIR # 20-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1161 HORN, DALE E HORN, SONJA 2532 ROYAL PINES CIR # 21-A CLEARWATER FL -33763 - 1116 STOCKS, DONALD B THE STOCKS, JUDITH O THE 2532 ROYAL PINES CIR # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1116 BANKS, LOAL C THE 2526 ROYAL PINES CIR # 22-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1162 JACOBSEN, LILLIAN M 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 GALLO, ANTHONY P BALLARINI, RONALD L WYNNE, PIERCE 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-B BALLARINI, MARY L WYNNE, BRIDGET CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-C 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 MALLORY, MARY M 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 S U, CHARLES SU, MARGARITA 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-H CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 HUTSON, DOROTHY 2520 ROYAL PINES CIR # 24-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1103 BUDNAR, EDWARD BUDNAR, ALICE C 2514 ROYAL PINES CIR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1112 VIDUNA, MARK R VIDUNA, DAVID B 2514 ROYAL PINES CIR # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1112 AXE, BARBARA A 4240 BOWEN RD TOLEDO OH 43613 - 3849 WALKER, BARBARA J 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 WINSTON, HENRY THE WINSTON, HERMEEN THE 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-G CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 APUZZO, DOLORES 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-J CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 BRADSHAW, CAROL L 105 CARLYLE CIR PALM HARBOR-FL 34683 - 1804 GIBSON, SHONA A 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-I CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 RUSSELL, PRICE E RUSSELL, EDNA R 541 CAMCO TER CHESAPEAKE VA 23302 - SHICKERT, WILLIAM R SHICKERT, BERNICE M 2514 ROYAL PINES CIR # 25-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1112 FLANAGAN, ANNETTE 2514 ROYAL PINES CIR # 25-E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1112 RODDEY, GLENN RODDEY, LORI 4442 NW 63RD DR COCONUT CREEK FL 33073 - LOCASCIO, CAROLINA LOCASCIO, ROSARIO J 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 HARDMAN, D A 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-H CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 MOCNY, CAROLE J THE 20501 NAUMANN AVE EUCLID OH 44123 - 3133 BRADSHAW, EDWARD RANDALL BRADSHAW, CAROL L 105 CARLYLE CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - 1804 WEINBERGER, HELENE P 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-J CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 BOLIN, SID THE BOLIN, DODY THE 2520 ROYAL PINES CIR # 24-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1103 ROMANIUK, PAULA 2514 ROYAL PINES CIR # 25-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1112 WUERKER, WAYNE A WUERKER, ARLEEN R 2514 ROYAL PINES CIR # 25-F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1112 MEEHAN, LYNN D 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 BURNS, JOHN L BURNS, DOROTHY H 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 JACKSON, GRETA A 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-I CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 MASSARO, CLARA 2525 ROYAL PINES CIR # 26-L CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1114 BAIR, TED VELOUDAS, DESPINA K PODSIADLIK, THOMAS M 235 WINDAWRD PSGE 2519 ROYAL PINES CIR # 27-B PODSIADLIK, BARBARA A CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1113 2519 ROYAL PINES CIR # 27-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1113 STEIN, ELEANOR W 2519 ROYAL PINES CIR # 27-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1113 RHYMES, JAY R. 2440 E TUDOR ANCHORAGE AK 99507 - 1185 LAURELWOOD CONDO 1 ASSN 2460 LAURELWOOD DR CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1527 TILLETT, PAMELA 2292 OAK NECK RD # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1531 MARLEY, ROBERT B 2292 OAK NECK RD # F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1531 GILSON, HELEN C 2276 OAK NECK RD # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1532 MANDATO, JOSEPH S MANDATO, ASSUNTA 13 BRENTWOOD DR JOHNSTON RI 02919 - 4801 WESTERMAN, FRANCIS W 2460 LAURELWOOD DR # 3-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1527 PROSTKA, IRENE L 2460 LAURELWOOD DR # F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1527 0 WORK, BARBARA 2519 ROYAL PINES CIR # 27-E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1113 HESSE, NORAH THE 2519 ROYAL PINES CIR # 27-H CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1113 FRITZELL, SHARON L 2292 OAK NECK DR # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1531 RANK, JEANETTE M EST 2292 OAK NECK RD # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1531 KREBS, ANNEDORE A 2276 OAK NECK RD # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1525 MALISSOVAS, ANDREAS S 2276 OAK NECK RD # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1536 JOHNSON, RONALD J 2460 LAURELWOOD DR # 3-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1527 HALSTEAD, CLARENCE E 2460 LAURELWOOD DR # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1527 FABER, MARCIA G 2492 LAURELWOOD DR # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1528 SETTLES, AMBROSE SETTLES, CHRISTINE J 2708 REID RD OWENSBORO KY 42303 - 2811 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 DALRYMPLE, MELVIN D THE 2292 OAK NECK RD # B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1531 MELTZER, DOROTHY C 2292 OAK NECK RD # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1531 KEETON, EUGENE R KEETON, JOAN M 2276 OAK NECK RD # 2B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1525 WEST, JOAN L PUTLAK, DENNIS L 2276 OAK NECK RD # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1525 HENDERSON, JOYCE H 146 ROBERTA DR HENDERSONVLLE TN 37075 - 5320 LEON, IMELDA B 2460 LAURELWOOD DR # 3E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1527 MAURER, ALANA. E 2492 LAURELWOOD DR # B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1560 FUCHS, ROBERT J THE MC LOUGHLIN, DANIEL J MILLER, FREDERICK A FUCHS, JOANNE S THE - FADEL, MARILYN L MILLER, MARY E 2492 LAURELWOOD DR # C 2492 LAURELWOOD DR # 4-D 2492 LAURELWOOD DR # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1560 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1528 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1557 DELANEY, MARY H WILSON, HAZEL M OHAMMERLE, LUCY B 2492 LAURELWOOD DR # 4-F 2484 LAURELWOOD DR # 5-A 2484 LAURELWOOD DR # 5-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1528 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1530 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1530 LAMONAKIS, GEORGE J 2484 LAURELWOOD DR # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1563 BOEHM, VAL B BOEHM, JENNIE M 2555 ONANDAGA DR COLUMBUS OH 43221 - 3619 SLATON, GENEVIEVE E 2484 LAURELWOOD DR # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1564 MC LOUGHLIN, MARTIN J MC LOUGHLIN, CHRISTINE 2484 LAURELWOOD DR # F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1564 REAGAN, DENNIS REAGAN, WENDY 2476 LAURELWOOD DR # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1559 FREEDMAN, DOROTHY 2476 LAURELWOOD DR # F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1539 FIEL, MANUEL IJ FIEL, ARLENE E 2468 LAURELWOOD DR # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1556 SCHUSTER, FRANK D SCHUSTER, NANCY T 2468 LAURELWOOD DR # F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1526 FERRI, THEODORE C JR 2444 LAURELWOOD DR # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1524 CUCCI, LAURIE 2444 LAUREL WOOD DR # F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1524 AMABILE, ANTHONY T 31 BROWN TER CRANFORD NJ 07016 - 1556 CIGANEK, IRWIN E CIGANEK, HELEN T 2476 LAURELWOOD DR # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1539 LEONARDO, MICHAEL LEONARDO, DORIS A 1737 ARABIAN LN PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 3345 HICKEY, SPEC NEEDS TRUST HICKEY, KATHRYN E BEN 2468 LAURELWOOD DR # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1526 LEYDEN, THOMAS G 2444 LAURELWOOD DR # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1524 BURNS, ROBERT F BURNS, EILEEN M 2444 LAURELWOOD DR # 8-D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1524 PLATIDES, NICHOLAS T PLATIDES, LINDA M 2260 OAK NECK RD # 9-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1522 WEIGLE, SYLVIA S 2476 LAURELWOOD DR # B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1559 BALESTRINO, MICHAEL J THE 2476 LAURELWOOD DR # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1539 ARNER, THOMAS E ARNER, VIRGINIA M 2468 LAURELWOOD DR # B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1556 FISK, LINDA M 2468 LAURELWOOD DR # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1526 KOWALSKI, MARTHA M 2444 LAURELWOOD DR # 8-13 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1524 CORTESE, JOSEPH M JR 30 WILK RD EDISON NJ 08837 - 2725 PAYNE, CAROL L 2260 OAK NECK RD # 9-13 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1522 WRIGHT, KATHLEEN MURPHY, ROGER J BERNARD, CAROL A M 2260 OAK NECK RD # 9-C MURPHY, KATHLEEN L 2260 OAK NECK RD # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1522 2260 OAK NECK RD # 9-1) CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1501 . CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1522 MONTEYNE, HELEN B 2260 OAK NECK RD # F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1501 LANE, ELEANOR M 2268 OAK NECK RD # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1537 EVERETT, JACQUELINE 2268 OAK NECK RD # 10-F CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1537 COLMAN, LEON 2452 LAURELWOOD DR # 11-C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1502 NICHOLAS, LORI P NICHOLAS, MICHAEL J 2452 LAURELWOOD DR # 6 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1502 ELICE, DOLORES E 2284 OAK NECK RD # C CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1540 MAY, VISA M ORR, LINDA M 116 PLUMMER RD SANBORNTON NH 03269 - 2359 LEONARD, KARL D LEONARD, KAREN 2412 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 TOYINBO, PETER TOYINBO, GRACE 2430 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 ?HISKEY, KATHY 2268 OAK NECK RD # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1537 SPEERS, GARY A SPEERS, JACQUELINE G 2268 OAK NECK RD # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1537 DARAS, ANTONIO DARAS, NIKI 2452 LAURELWOOD DR # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1500 VON HUBEN, BERNICE G 2452 LAURELWOOD DR # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1558 WAUGH, JOHN H 2284 OAK NECK DR # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1540 CONKLIN, KEVIN 2284 OAK NECK DR # D CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1540 AL SAGGAF, ALI MOHAMED KHATTAB, MOUNIRA AMIN 2400 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 FERGUSON, DEBORAH C 2418 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 DAHER, GEORGE A DAHER, MARY E 2436 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 GANYU, ALEX L JR GANYU, GLORIA A 2268 OAK NECK RD # 10-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1537 MOHNEY, URSULA M 2268 OAK NECK RD # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1537 MC DERMOTT, MARTIN M MC DERMOTT, CHRISTINE 2452 LAURELWOOD DR # B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1500 PAUL, LINDA R 2452 LAURELWOOD DR E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1558 TURNER, JOAN P 2284 OAK NECK RD # B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1540 MILLER, PATRICIA A 2284 OAK NECK RD # E CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1540 GOOD, ROSENA 2406 MOOREHAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 HUNSUCKER, CHARLOTTE R 2424 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 SMITH, JOANN M 2442 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 MALAVE, OMAR TORELLI, JOSEPH A MC CRANE, GLORIA M APPEL MALAVE, EVELYN 2454 MOORE HAVEN DR W MC CRANE, PAUL M 2448 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 2460 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 BOHEM, SANDRA 2466 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 BROWN, PATRICK M BROWN, CARTE 2484 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 HOUSTON, ISABELLA M THE 2420 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 LEMONIAS, NICHOLAS J LEMONIAS, NANCY 2438 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 MITROPOULOS, PAUL MITROPOULOS, GEORGIA 2456 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 WARREN, BENTON B THE WARREN, MAEBELLE S THE 2474 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 MARRON, PHILIP T MARRON, LISA I 2473 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 MOORE, ROBERT J MOORE, LOUISE M 2455 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 GLORIOSO, SUZANNE D 2437 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 OULLOA, SILVIA EVA MONTOYASMIKSZA, YVONNE T 2472 MOORE HAVEN DR W 2478 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 BOLDING, ROBIN E 2490 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1618 TRAUNER, DEBORAH L 2398 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1616 NEWTON, LYNNE B 2426 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 FLOWERS, WALLACE P FLOWERS, BARBARA S 2444 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 FULTZ, JOHN B FULTZ, BRIDGET L 94-510 LUMIAINA ST # A103 WAIPAHU HI 96797 - 5291 DRAGO, RICHARD R DRAGO, JOSEPHINE B 2485 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 CRANFORD, TREVOR J CRANFORD, PATTI P PO BOX 5787 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 5787 LEIVAS, PAUL R LEIVAS, HEATHER F 2449 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 GIESE, MARK WELLS, JULIE 2431 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 MILLER, PERRY L MILLER, BARBARA S 2432 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 KAHANA, ANNE R 2450 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 MONROE, ALICE J 2468 TIMBERCREST CIR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1626 ALEXANDER, THOMAS C 503 S WAPELLA AVE MT PROSPECT IL 60056 - KURATNICK, ANN M 2461 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 MARTIN, LYNDA E 2443 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 PIFF, WALTER F JR PIFF, ROSEMARIE C 2425 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 ADKINS, CHRISTINE M RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO S THE SMITH, LINDA M 2419 MOORE HAVEN DR W RODRIGUEZ, SOL M THE KEELER, DALE K CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 2413 MOORE HAVEN DR W 2407 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 DAVIDSON, RICHARD P • "' DAVIDSON, MILDRED L 2401 MOORE HAVEN DR W CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1619 Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition Doug Williams PO Box 8204 Clearwater, F1 33758 Clearwater Neighborhood Assoc. Woodgate I&II Doug William Jennifer Ritter PO Box 8204 2345 Ashmore Drive Clearwater, F133758 Clearwater, F133763 FLS2005-08060 / PLT2005-00017 2506 Countryside Blvd FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANIS, INC. JUL Nc PL}11`'ViNJ3 Y eJ? E VE?.° 4i ?lE ?,T 'VC CITV OF CLEAR4 IVA F EW. COUNTRYSIDE EXECUTIVE GOLF COURSE TRAFFIC STUDY Submitted to: City of Clearwater Prepared For: Beazer Homes Tampa Division 2630 S. Falkernburg Rd., Ste. A Riverview, FL 33569 Prepared By: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, Florida 34655 (727) 849-7588 Date: December 27, 2004 Ct ? ,o 2.0 INTRODUCTION Countryside Executive Golf Course is a proposed residential development that will include 280 dwelling units of condominiums/townhomes. The project site is located south of State Road 580, and northwest of Countryside Boulevard between Belcher Road and Enterprise Road, see Figure 1. The existing Countryside Executive Golf Course and an existing 3,200 SF high turnover sit- down restaurant located adjacent to the golf course will be removed to allow the project to proceed. This traffic analysis has been prepared based on the methodology discussed with City of Clearwater staff on August 6, 2004. A copy of the methodology letter from this meeting is provided in the Appendix. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing traffic counts were collected on August 11 (Wednesday), August 17 (Tuesday), and August 18 (Wednesday), 2004 by Adams Traffic, Inc. for the Countryside Executive Golf Course project. Traffic counts were taken from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. with subtotals taken every 15 minutes. The highest four consecutive 15-minute increments that were taken are the PM Peak Hour. The existing PM Peak Hour traffic counts were taken at the following intersections: 1. Main Street (S.R. 580) at Belcher Road 2. Main Street (S.R. 580) at Enterprise Road 3. Countryside Boulevard at Enterprise Road 4. Countryside Boulevard at Oak Neck Road 5. Countryside Boulevard at U.S. 19 Ramps 6. Belcher Road/Countryside Boulevard at Belcher Road (NW leg) The existing counts were adjusted using information from the Florida Department of Transportation's 2003 Peak Season Factor Category Report (PSFCR). A factor of 1.07 was applied to the traffic counts on the Main Street intersections and Countryside Boulevard at Enterprise Road to reach peak season volumes. A factor of 1.09 was applied to the rest of the traffic counts at the intersections on Countryside Boulevard at Oak Neck Road, U.S. 19 Ramps, and Belcher Road to reach peak season volumes. A Total Traffic Determination Sheet is provided in the Appendix to document these calculations. The volumes were then analyzed using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS), release 4.1.d. The Main Street (S.R. 580) at Enterprise Road intersection is unsignalized. All other intersections reviewed are signalized. The result of this analysis are that Main Street (S.R. 580) at Belcher Road and Countryside Boulevard at U.S. 19 currently operate at Level of Service (LOS) D, Countryside Boulevard at Enterprise Road and Countryside Boulevard at Belcher Road operate at LOS C, and Countryside Boulevard at Oak Neck Road operates at LOS B. The Main Street (S.R. 580) at Enterprise Road intersection, the only unsignalized intersection, was found to operate at LOS F. Since the acceptable operating condition for these roads is LOS D, all of the intersections, except the unsignalized Main Street (S.R. 580) at Enterprise Road, currently operate at acceptable levels of service. Copies of the HCS computer runs are provided in the Appendix and on a CD. ? ,o 4.0 5.0 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Existing peak season volumes on the roadways that will be significantly impacted by traffic from the Countryside Executive Golf Course was increased to the year 2007, the projected year that the project will be completed. The 2007 background traffic was projected to increase by 2 percent per year. PROJECT TRAFFIC Project traffic has been estimated using information from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE's) Trip Generation Report, 7th Edition, 2003. Table 1 provides the trip generation estimate for the existing and proposed development on the Countryside Executive Golf Course site. The existing development consists of the 18-hole Countryside Executive Golf Course. The proposed development includes 280 dwelling units of condominiums/townhomes use. Access to the proposed land uses will come from four driveways: Drive 1 from Enterprise Road, Drives 2 and 3 from Countryside Boulevard, and Drive 4 from Belcher Road. Drives 1 and 2 are proposed to have full access to the adjacent roads and Drives 3 and 4 are proposed to operate as right turn in and right turn out only drives. Medians on the main roads at Drives 3 and 4 will prohibit left turns in or out of these drives. Project traffic was added to future background traffic to determine the future total volumes. As previously indicated, Table 1 identifies traffic generated by the existing Countryside Executive Golf Course on the site, as well as the proposed development. The total P.M. peak hour traffic from the proposed development (94 inbound and 46 outbound trips) has been assigned to the highway network even though there would only be a net increase of 72 inbound and 19 outbound trips. The distribution of project trips to the highway network was made based on the travel patterns exhibited by existing traffic in the project vicinity. FUTURE YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS As was noted under the existing conditions review, the unsignalized intersection of SR 580, Main Street, with Enterprise Road currently operates at an unacceptable level of service. This is due to the northbound traffic on Enterprise Road desiring to either turn left or go through the Main Street intersection. Two options exist to return this intersection to acceptable operation. One is to provide a traffic signal at the intersection and the other is to channelize the northbound approach to allow only right turn movements. Main Street is an arterial road under the jurisdiction of the Florida Department of Transportation. The closest spacing at which signals will be approved for installation on an arterial road is 2,640 feet (one-half mile). The distance between the existing signalized intersections on Main Street at Belcher Road and U.S. 19 is 2,700 feet. This distance between Enterprise Road and U.S. 19 is 840 feet. This close spacing on Main Street between Enterprise Road and U.S. 19 does not meet the minimum signal spacing requirements. Additionally, a signal would not be installed if the warrants indicated in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices are not met. It is unlikely that this location would meet the warrants necessary to justify a signal. Therefore it is believed that a signal could not be installed at Main Street and Enterprise Road. Instead, the developers are willing to channelize the intersection to provide a northbound right turn lane and eliminate the northbound left and through movements. This assumption has been built into the future year traffic analysis. The projected northbound left and through volumes on Enterprise Road have been redistributed through the highway network. ' The total traffic analyzed, as indicated in Figure 2, includes the background traffic and project traffic. The intersections and highway links in the study area were analyzed to determine future ' year operating conditions. First the intersections were analyzed using the HCS software. The results of this analysis are indicated in Table 2. As is indicated, all signalized intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service without improvement. The unsignalized Main Street (S.R. ' 580) at Enterprise Road intersection was found to operate at an acceptable LOS D with the improvement discussed above. Copies of the HCS computer runs are provided in the Appendix and an electronic version is provided on CD. ' Highway link operation has been established using generalized peak hour volumes from the ' FDOT 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Table 4-7 from that document, see Appendix for a copy, identifies directional peak hour maximum volumes for various types of roadways. Table 3 summarizes the link operating conditions. Listed in this table are the roadway segments ' reviewed, the acceptable level of service, and maximum service volume (SV) for the acceptable level of service indicated in the FDOT Table 4-7. Also indicated are the 2007 background, project, and total traffic on the link by direction and the projected level of service in the buildout year of the facility. As is indicated, all road segments are projected to operate at acceptable levels of service. 6.0 CONCLUSION Based on the above review it is concluded that the 280 townhomes proposed for the Countryside Executive Golf Course can occur and allow the roadway network to maintain acceptable operation with the following improvement: The northbound approach on Enterprise Road at Main Street should be reconfigured to provide a channelized right turn lane, eliminating the ' options of left and through movements for this leg of the intersection. .cp KACountryside Golf Course\Reports\Countryside Executive Golf Course Traffic Study-October.doc r ©Copyright 2004 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission. ,2 a rn N I L 424 1577 293 STATE ROAD 580 (MAIN STREET) 5 E- 2294 22 450 1838(1) 1504(10) -? 53(10) 122 017 ? N O Q 10 0 W w ( ) DRIVE 4 o_ o= p NTS < n c? o n z X ? w DRIVE 1 S i 'yam ,6h ? 51ryg w S ' b6l?o`ybl ?? ' 0 ?S L/ ?y0 `b) b,Llkl s 00 y00 oJ`' c V/ 0 7 IL ` 9 11 E LEGEND ?T X - BACKGROUND TRAFFIC EE (XX) - PROJECT TRIPS rya ^`?ryA O9'f ? p ,yh 'vF`c °0 0?O to a v 0 3 T cli a, 1a L I ?h DESCRIPTION: PROJECT No. EPN: 2007 TRIP ASSIGNMENT 282-02 169 L DATE: FIGURE: D FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 10/13/04 ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 8 PLANNERS DRAWN BY: 3030 Starkey Blvd, New Pori Richey FL 34655 ' Tel: (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 MKC ©Copyright 2004 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Drawings and concepts may not be used or reproduced without written permission. Table 1. Countryside Executive Golf Course Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Development Land Use ITE LUC Size Units Daily In Out Total In Out Total Existing Golf Course 430 18 Holes 643 32 8 40 22 27 49 Proposed Condominium / Townhome 230 280 DU 1,540 20 98 118 94 46 140 Remove Existing (643) (32) (8) (40) (22) (27) (49) Net Increase 897 (12) 89 78 72 19 91 Date: 12-23-04 Sources: ITE Trip Generation Report, 7th Edition, 2003, FDC T:\169\Traffic\[Tables.x1s]Table 1 I Table 2. Intersection Analysis Intersection Signalized? Existing LOS 2007 Total Traffic LOS LOS with Improvement Improvement Countryside at Belcher Yes C C Countryside at Oak Neck Yes B B Countryside at Enterprise Yes C C Countryside at US 19 Yes D D SR 580 at Belcher Yes D D SR 580 at Enterprise No F D Channelize NB right turn lane Enterprise at Drive 1 No NA B Countryside at Drive 2 No NA C Countryside at Drive 3 No NA B Belcher at Drive 4 No NA B ' Source: FDC Date: 10-15-04 ' TA169\Traffic\[Tables.x1s]Table 2 Table 3. Link Analysis 2007 Total Traffic Road Limits Direction Acceptable T Number Max SV Background Project Total LOS LOS of Lanes i Bl d Belcher to EB D 3 2,790 1751 13 1764 C . v Countrys de US 19 WB D 3 2,790 1083 17 1100 C R B l h d Count side Blvd NB D 2 1,620 1381 21 1402 C er e c oa I to SR 580 SB D 2 1,620 892 0 892 C SR 580 Belcher to EB D 3 2,790 1838 10 1848 C US 19 W B D 3 2,790 2294 0 2294 C E t i R d Count side Blvd NB D 1 760 149 19 168 B n erpr se oa I to SR 580 SB D 1 760 232 8 240 B Source: FDC Date: 10-13-04 T:\169\Traffic\[Tables.xls]Table 2 APPENDIX . Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 August 9, 2004 Mr. Bennett Elbo Traffic Operations Engineer 100 South Myrtle Avenue Suite 220 Post Office Box 4748 Clearwater, Florida 337584748 Re: Countryside Executive Golf Course Redevelopment/ Transportation Methodology Dear Mr. Elbo: This letter is being written to confirm the discussions of the meeting, which was held on August 6, 2004 with Mr. Paul Bertels and you concerning the methodology for a traffic study to be prepared for development of the Countryside Property. A traffic study will be undertaken to assess the impact of the proposed development on the surrounding roads. As discussed in our meeting, the land uses proposed for the project include 280 dwelling units of ' townhouse use and a 17,500 s.f. shopping center. The. project site is located on the north side of Countryside Boulevard and the west side of Enterprise Road. A portion of the property also connects to Belcher Road. Existing land use on the site includes a restaurant and a golf course. These existing land uses will be replaced with the proposed development. The traffic study will look at the trips to be generated by the proposed development using appropriate Land Use Codes from the Institute of Transportation Engineers informational report Trip Generation, 7`h Edition, 2003. Trips to be generated by the proposed land uses are indicated in Table 1, attached. Trips generated by the existing land uses will be identified and -subtracted from the trips generated by the proposed land uses to determine the number of new trips added to the highway network. The project study area will include the highway links of Countryside Boulevard from Belcher. Road to US 19, Belcher Road from Countryside Boulevard to SR 580 and Enterprise Road from Countryside Boulevard to SR 580. PM peak hour turning movements counts will be obtained at the following locations: Countryside Boulevard at Belcher Road, Countryside Boulevard at Enterprise Road, Countryside Boulevard at US 19, SR 580 at Belcher Road, and SR 580 at Enterprise Road. The counts will be taken from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. with subtotals taken every 15 minutes on a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday. The highest four consecutive 15 minute increments will be the PM Peak Hour.. 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com / ' Mr. Bennett Elbo August 9, 2004 Page 2 The Peak Hour traps will be adjusted to peak season volumes based on the Florida Department of Transportation's Peak Season Factor Category Report 2003 for Pinellas County. Project trip distribution to the highway network will be based on the observed turning movements during the traffic count. A figure will be prepared to identify project trip distribution to the surrounding roads. The traffic study will review the projected level of service at the intersections counted. Operation of the highway links on Countryside Boulevard, Belcher Road, and Enterprise Road will be reviewed. Traffic will be projected to the build-out year using a 2% annual growth for background traffic. Trucks will be assumed to be 2% of the traffic. Any improvements needed will be identified in the traffic report. Two copies of the report along with a CD containing the computer analysis of intersections and links will be provided to the City of Clearwater. ?j If you have any questions or suggested revisions concerning this methodology statement, lease contact me. p Roy E. Vice P pman, ent of Transportation Services -c: Paul Bertels, City of Clearwater Ryan Brinson, City of Clearwater Steve Gamm, Beazer Homes Tim Johnson, Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Ed Mazur, Florida Design Consultants, Inc. FDC. File No: 282-0240.06 Y-W,WnUyside PWPaWJ ttasWboAY- ;4daiiw 7-raffir4 I no.. P. ©. Box 997 Plant City, FL 33564 Tel:(813) 763-7763 Fax:(813) 659-8688 Project No.: Turning Movement Count Field Data Sheet Date: 1 t o Count Times: Major Street: Sic S2 Ego Direction: E-W Speed Limit: S mph Minor Street:G Direction: N-S Speed Limit: YS mph City/County: CAe-&r wc.?r S Weather: Phasing: 3 Cycles Measured: LZ s. 8r.. s y s. 21S. 1I0S. 51:5- 2lc s. S s• 3`{ s. 2Bs . slop $ ?f s. 180. Intersection Sketch Z 5S. Cos. 57-s. 3 2. v. -5U Os. - $D s N ?n Sivee ? r (w7 an a? r? r r Turning Movement Count Adams Traffic File Name : belcher&main (813) 763-7763 Site Code :00004191- City/County: Clearwater/Pinellas . Weathe Weather Clear Start Date :08111/2004 ' _,. _ ,_ _,_ __ Gross Printed- Passenger vehicles - H e avy Vehicles - U-ru ms Page No : 1 BELCHER ROAD MAIN STREET (SR $60) __ _ BELCFF R ROAD MAIN STREET (SR 580) - _ - - St t T -- - l d T h u Southbound i h Ai Westbound _ Northbound __ Eastbou nd ar ime P . e _ r 8 g R t OR 6 ._A Total _ Left " Thru ' Right_ RTOR App. Total Left ' Thru R• bt RTOR Abp. Tota1_ Left Thru Ft?ht RTOR _ App Total Irtt Tots! 04:00 M 31 6 21 1 154 72 322 33 40 467 46 162 14 33 255 76 315 13 . --- 21 . 425 _ 1501 04:15 PM : 5.1 109 24 25 209 65 321 38 31 455 54 180 10 25 269 88 295 19 16 418- 1351 30 PM 04 42 109 11 32 194 68 277 28 21 394 43 187 17 33 280 90 313 12 17 432 1300 _ 04:45 PM M 35 _ ' 99 15 20 _ 169 69 ___ 336 43 _ 41 491 41 211 13 16 281 IDS 335 12 13 466 1407 Total 159 403 71 93 726 Y74 1258 142 133 1667 164 740 54 1 b7 _ 1065 _ 360 1258 _ 56 _ 67 1741 5359 05:00 PM 32 87 22 35 176 61 395 88 30 574 42 232 13 19 306 99 346 16 14 475; 1531 05:15 PM 60 126 22 26 234 67 335 61 20 483 37 214 10 17 278 97 326 21 1D 454 1449 05:30 PM 42 109 32 20 203 61 322 51 40 474 51 264 21 16 352 95 319 8 14 _ 05:45 PM 40 124 25 19 206 58 336 38 _ _ 26 - 458 - 51 213 19 26 309 99 274 15 13 436 1465 Total 174 446 101 100 821 247 1368 238 916 1989- 181 923 _ 63 78 -1246- 390 1265 _ 60 5T 401 1 6 1376 _ 76 5821 Grand Total 333 849 172 193 1547 521 2646 380 249 3796 365 1663 117 185 2330 750 2523 116 118 3507 Apprch % 21.5 54.9 11.1 12.5 13.7 69.7 10.0 6.6 15.7 71.4 5.0 7.9 21.4 71 9 3 3 3 4 11180 Total % 3.0 7.6 1.5 1.7 13.8 4.7 23.7 3.4 2.2 34.0 3.3 14.9 1.0 1.7 20.8 6.7 . 22.6 . 1.0 . 1,1 31.4 BELCHER ROAD S h MAIN STREET (SR 560) BELCHE§ ROAD • -- ST ( MAIN REE7 SR 580) ' 'me * ' out bound Westbound _ . •. ••• N .. orthbound E astboun d • ____Start I Left Thro •_ RAF ht Peak Hair Frcm 04:60 RA to 05:45 Phi - Peak 1 of 1 RTOR_ App. Toot __• lsit 77?ru • Right•_ RTOR App.Tcial_ l,.ett Thru Ft?trt ? RTOR -- _ Abp. Total • Left __• _Th ru R•r?trt_ -BY OR App.Total • _ Inl Tohai Intersection 04:45 PM Volume Percent 169 21.6 421 53 8 91 11 6 101 12 9 782 258 12 8 1390 68 7 243 12 0 131 6 5 2022 171 921 57 68 1217 397 1326 57 51 1631 5852 05:00 Volume 32 . 87 . 22 . 35 176 . 61 . 395 . 88 . 30 574 14,1 42 75.7 232 4.7 13 5.6 .19 306 21.7 99 724 346 3.1 28 Peak Factor 16 14 475 1531 High Int. 05:15 PM 05:00 PM 0 5;30 PM 05:00 PM 0 .956 Volume 60 126 22 26 234 61 395 88 30 574 51 264 21 16 352 99 346 16 14 475 Peak Fador 0.835 0,881 0864 0.964 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 0 5:00 PM 04:45 PM Volume 174 446 101 100 821 258 1390 243 131 2022 181 923 63 78 1245 397 1326 57 51 1831 Percent 21.2 54.3 12.3 12-2 12.8 68.7 12.0 6.5 14.5 74.1 5.1 6.3 21.7 72.4 3 1 28 High Int 05.15 PM 05:00 PM 05:30 PM 05:00 PM . Volume 60 126 22 26 234 61 395 66 30 574 51 264 21 16 352 99 346 16 14 475 Peak Factor 0.877 0.881 0.884 0.964 t b \? c Y rr 1 W Tuming Movement Count Adams Traffic (813) 763-7763 File Name : belcher&main City/County: Clearwater/Pinel las Code Site 00004191 : 191 Weather. Clear Start Date : 08/1 1/ ' Groups Printed- Heavy Vehicles Page No : 1 BELCHER ROAD S thb d MAIN STREET (SR 580) BELCHER ROAD -? -- _ MAIN STREET (SR 580) - -' _ Stag Time _ _ Left o Thru - u ou Rah! __ n RTOR App. Total Le(t TIn Westbound Right RTOR App: Total Left Thru Northbound ' Rl1aht RTOR Ate Tonal _ _ t Lery Th Eastbound _ 04:00 PM 0 T 2 0 3 1 11 2 0 14 0 5 *• 0 _ 0 . N Rte, M _. RTOR 7atal !nt Total - 04:15 PM 3 8 2 1 14 0 13 0 0 13 1 2 0 0 5 3 3 5 0 1 g - 31 04:30 PM 1 4 0 0 5' 1 6 3 0 10 0 4 1 2 7 , 2 13 0 18 3 48 04:45 PM 0 _ 2 _ 1 4 7 6 9 0 0 15 0 0 0 1 1 1 6 1 3 13 35 Total 4 15 5 5 29 78 39 5 _ 0 52 1 11 - 1 3 16 2 - 8 _ 12 38 0 -' 1 0 14 37 7 05:00 PM 0 4 0 0 4 2 7 2 1 12 0 4 0 2 6 1 10 0 05:15 PM 2 0 0 0 2 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 2 2 0 8 1 12 34 05:30 PM 3 4 1 0 8 1 9 0 0 10 0 3 0 0 3 1 2 0 1 9 20 05:45 PM . 1 3- 0 0 4 • 1 _ 6 2 -. 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 25 Total 6 11 1 0 18 4 29 4 1 __38. 0 T 0. - 4- 11 •-- 4"' 4 24 0 0 6 19 -.. -' "- '- '- - "- 0 3 31 98 Grand Total 10 26 6 5 47 12 68 9 1 90 1 18 1 7 27 12 62 Apprch % 21.3 55.3 12.8 10.6 13.3 75.6 10.0 1.1 3.7 66.7 3.7 25.9 14 1 72 9 1 10 85 249 Total % 4.0 10.4 2.4 2.0 16.9 4.8 27.3 3.6 0.4 36.1 0.4 72 0.4 2 8 10 8 . 4 8 . 2 9 1.2 11.8 . . . 4. 0.4 4.0 34,1 - - BELCHER i20Ab MAIN STREET (SR 580) - _ Southbound Westbound __ Start Time Sef1 .- Thru R hl _ RTOR _.App. TTotat Left . Tkv M911 RTOR -A? Tdel Peak Hour Fran 04 :00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 _ _ - Interse f*n 04:15 PM Volume 4 18 3 5 30 9 35 5 1 50 Percent 13.3 60.0 10.0 . 16.7 18.0 70.0 10.0 2.0 04:15 Volume 3 8 2 1 14 0 13 0 0 13 Peak Factor Hi h Int 04 15 PM BELCHER ROAD - MAIN STREET (SR 5$d) Northbound Eastbound Left _7hru_ Ri ht_ - - - - RTOR -- 9 App: Total left 7 ru _ Ri9 _ ht ET 1 t . • - -App _Total Int. Tonal 1 10 1 5 5.9 58.6 5.9 29.4 1 2 0 0 9 04:45 PM 04:30 PM Volume 3 8 2 1 14 6 9 0 0 15 0 4 1 2 Peak Factor 0.536 0,833 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 B ch 04 17 6 43 1 7 57 154 10.5 75.4 1.8 12.3 3 2 13 0 3 18 48 04.15 PM 0.802 7 2 13 0 3 18 0.607 0.792 Y pproa Volume .15 PM 4 18 3 5 04:00 PM 30 8 3 04:15 PM 04:15 PM Percent 13.3 .60.0 10.0 16.7 9 15.4 75.0 5 0 52 1 10 9.6 0.0 5.9 58 8 1 5 17 6 43 5 9 29 4 High Int. 04:15 PM 104:45 PM . 04:30 PM . . 10.5 75.4 Volume 3 8 2 1 14. 6 9 0 0 15 0 4 • 04:15 PM 1 2 Peak Factor . 0.536 0.667 A 7 2 13 0.607 1 7 57 1.8 123 0 3 i8 0.792 Ada nw rr s r,,,, P.O. Box 997 ' Plant City, FL 33564 Project No.: Lim- Turning TO:(813) 763-7763 Fax:(813) 659-8688 Movement Count Field Data Sheet Date: $?11\ bL4 Count Times: 144 'C PM Major Street: 5$a S Direction: E-W Speed Limit: El ; mph Minor Street: ri Le Direction: N-S Speed Limit: 35 mph City/County: tarwa ?,r ?? Ac" Weather: Phasing: 3 Cycles Measured: ?S? G r??X i L? Intersection Sketch i t i i t AM L_ M ` M ~ Turning ?lovemmCount Adams Traffic (813) 763-7763 City/County- Clearwater/Pinellas Weather., Clear - - G_ coups Printed- Passenger Vehides -.Heavy Vehicles - U-Turns - SUNCOUNTRYCLEANERS MAIN STREET(SR 580) ENTERPRISE ROAD Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time ' Left ThrU RFght App. Total _ _ Left Thru Rht App Total Left Thro Right _ App Total_ 04:00 Phi 2 0 450 2 452 16 _ 0 4 20 04:15 PM 1 0 0 1 12 460 3 475 21 0 12 33 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 403 1 404 15 0 12 27 04:45 PM 0 - _0 0 0 9 477 1 487 11 _ 0 13 24 Total 2 0 1 3 - 21 1790 7 _ 1818 63 _ _ 0 - 41 704 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0' 5 543 0 548 29 0 15 44 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 3 505 2 510 7 1 12 20 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 502 1 505 22 1 11 34 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 5 - 434 2 ' 441 17 0 7 24 Total 0 6 0 0 15 1984 -5 2004 _ 75 - 2 45 - 122 Grand Total 2 0 1 3 36 3774 12 3822 138 2 86 228 Apprch % 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.9 98.7 0.3 61.1 0.9 38.1 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 50.5 0.2 51.1 1.8 0.0 1.2 3.0 9UN•000NTRY CLEANERS MAIN STREET (SR 380) Southbound Westbound Start Time _ i eR ' _ Thru flighi_ App. Total test _ Thru Right App. Total y rein Hour From 04.00 PM to 05:45 PAt _ Peak I of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 19 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 05:00 Volume 0 0 0 0 5 Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM 05:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 5 Peak Factor Peak Hour From 04: 00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak f of 1 By Approach 04:00 PM 04:45 PM Volume 2 0 1 3 t9 Percent 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.9 High Int. 04:00 PM 05:00 PM Volume 1 0 1 2 5 Peak Factor 0.375 File Name : main&enterprise Site Code : 00004191 Start Date : 08/19/2004 ' Page No : 1 MAW STREET (SR 580) Eastbound Left Thro Right App. Total - Int. Tout 6 400 _ 9 409 883 1 371 19 391 900 0 401 16 417 848 0 431 10 441 952 1 1603 54 1658 -3583 0 432 17 449 1041 0 459 12 471 1001 0 417 8 425 964 0 412 _ 10 .422 887 0 1720 47' 1767_ 3893 1 3323 101 3425 7476 0.0 97.0 2.9 0.0 44.4 1.4 45.8 ENTERPRISE hOAD MAIN STREET (SR 580) Northbound Eastbound Left Thro _ Right _ App. Total Leh Ttirv Rtit App. Total . Int. Total 2027 4 2050 69 2 51 122 0 1739 47 98.9 0.2 56.6 1.6 41.8 0.0 97.4 26 543 0 548 29 0 15 44 0 432 17 05:00 PM 05:95 PM 543 0 548 29 0 15 44 0 459 12, 0.935 0.693 04:15 PM 04:45 PM 2027 4 2050 76 0 52 128 0 1739 47 98.9 0.2 59.4 0.0 40.6 0.0 97.4 26 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 543 0 548 29 0 15 44 0 459 12 0.935 0.727 1786 3958 449 1041 0.951 471 0.948 1786 471 0.948 1 .J Turning Movement Count Adams Traffic (813) 763-7763 City/County. Clearwater/Pinellas Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Heavy Vehicles SUN COUNTRY CLEANERS MAIN STREET (SR 580) ENTERPRISE ROAD Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Lett That Right App. Total Left Thru Right App Total Left Thou Right App Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 0415 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0430 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 . 0 0 0 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 •0 56 0 56 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 13 1 0 1 2 05.15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 11 1 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 0 2 38 0 40 2 0 1 3 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 2 94 0 96 2 0 1 3 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 21 97.9 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 Total % 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 1 1 53.7 0.0 54.9 1 1 0.0 0.6 17 SUN COUNTRY CLEAN ERS MAIN STREET (SR 580) ENTERPRISE ROAD Southbound Westbound Northbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left That Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Pea% Hour From 04:00 6M to 05.45 PM • Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04.15 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 1 52 0 53 1 0 1 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 981 0.0 50.0 0.0 50 0 05:00 Volume 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 13 1 . 0 1 Peak Factor High Jnt 3.45.00 PM 04.45 PM 05:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 1 0 1 Peak Factor 0.828 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak i of 1 2 2 04:30 PM 2 o 0.250 52 D 14 0 53 108 98.1 15 0 By Approach 04.00 PM 04:00 PM 05.00 PM 04:15 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 56 2 0 1 3 0 52 t Percent - - 0.0 100.0 0.0 66.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 98 1 1 9 High Int. - 04:00 PM 05:00 PM . . 04:30 PM Volume - - - 0 18 0 16 1 0 1 2 0 15 0 Peak Factor 0 875 0.375 • File Name :main&snterprise m ? Site Code 00004191 w Start Date : (38/11/2004 Page No I a p MAIN STREET (SR 5801 Eastbound a Left Thru Rignt App. Iota! 1n: Total F 0 4 0 4 20 0 13 1 14 27 0 15 0 15 26 0 10 0 10 26 « 0 42 1 _ 43. 99 a 0 14 0 14 29 a a 0 12 0 12 19 v 0 1 2 3 12 0: a 0 4 0 4 16 0 31 2 33 76 0 73 3 76 175 0.0 96.1 3.9 0.0 417 1.7 43.4 Left TJtgt Right App. cola! Int Total MAIN STREET (SR 580) Eastbound C 0 D ? 0.0 0 H n 1 1.9 14 29 0.931 15 0.883 CM 53 15 0.883 D m 08/2:572004 1z: rja - ...,..-.--- -- A aamkTrams I rt.G ' P,O. Box 997 Plant City, FL 33564 Project No.: 6y? Tel:(813) 763-7763 Fax:(813) 659-8688 ' Turning Movement Count Field Data Sheet Date: Count Times: Major Street: uer Qo , dt Direction: N-S Speed Limit: yo mph Minor Street: Po0cmkwrst 1?4\ - Direction: E-W Speed Limit: 35 mph F-V City/County: C(tA'? Atle „was Weather: Phasing: fi Ace p, rAe-r 1 ?r ' 3 Cycles Measured: 88 s. -7-7 s. J b 5 s, ?3 s. 41s 12os. ' Intersection Sketch 10 3 ,?; . S 7 s BOOS, rr --r rr r? rr r? r? r r r? r r r r? rr ?r¦? ?r r r Turning Movement Count Adams Traffic (813) 763-7763 File Name : countrysideftelcher CityJCounty: Clea rwater/Pinellas Site Code : 00004191 Weath Weather Clear Start Date :08118/2004 Group s Printed- Pa ssenger Veh;des - He v Vehi cles - U-Turns Page No COUNTRYSIDE BOU LEVARD BELCHER ROAD BELCHER R6AO _ Southbound Northbound as d S1aK?ime 54:00 PM Lett 0 Thru 138 Right _ 0 RTOR - 0 ApE Total 1 _ Left Thru _ Ri?M RTOR _ Abp. Total Left - • Thru Rr ht RTO R App. Total Int Total 04:15 PM 0 135 0 0 38 135 208 158 233 260 0 0 0 0 441 418 0 0 6 139 _ . 0 139 71g 04:30 PM 0 158 0 0 158 155 287 0 a 442* 0 0 0 100 0 100 653 0_4:45 PM _ 0 148 0 _ _ 0 148 190 281 0 0 471 0 0 127 1 0 127 727 Total 0 579 0 0 579 791 -_ 3061 - - 0 0 _ 1772 0 14 0 480 a 114 733 0 480 2831 05:00 PM 0 181 0 0 I BI 212 355 0 0 567 0 0 121 0 05:15 PM a 177 0 0 177 165 342 0 0 507 0 0 139 121 869 05:30 PM 0 153 0 0 153 276 337 0 0 613 0 0 116 0 139 823 05:45 PM 0 122 0 0 122 200 " 287 _ 0 0 487 0 0 108 0 0 116 883 Total 0 633 d 0 633 653 1321 0 _ 0 _ _ 2174 0 - d 484 U 108 _ 717 484 3291 Grand Total 0 1212 0 0 1212 1564 2382 0 0 3946 0 0 964 0 Apprch % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 60.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 100 0 0 0 954 6122 Total % 0.0 19.8 0.0 0.0 19.8 25.5 38.9 0.0 0.0 64.5 0.0 . 0.0 . 15.7 . 0.0 15.7 COUNTRY96E BOULEVARD BELCHER ROAD Southbound Northbound BE LCIiER R OAD Start Time Leh _ Thn! Peak Hour From 0400 PM la 05:45•PM - Peak 1 of 1 R_•rjht . RTOR.. App. Total Lett- Thru Right_ _ RTOR App. Total - LeR - Thru •- . Eastbound Right _ RTOR AP e. Total _ Int. Taal Intersection 04:45 PM Volume Percent 0 0.0 659 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 659 643 39.1 1315 60 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2158 0 0 490 0 490 3307 05:30 Volume 0 153 0 0 153 276 . 337 . 0 . 0 613 0.0 0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Peak Factor 0 116 0 116 882 High Int. 05:00 PM 05:30 PM 05:15 PM 0.937 Volume Peak Factor 0 181 0 0 181 276 337 0 0 613 0 0 139 0 139 0.910 0.880 0.681 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 BY Approach 04:30 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM Volume Percent 0 0.0 664 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.D 664 853 39 2 1321 60 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2174 0 0 501 0 501 High Int. 05:00 PM . 05.30 PM . . . 0.0 05:15 PM 0.0 100.0 0.0 Volume Peak Factor 0 16t 0 0 181 276 337 0 0 613 D 0 139 0 139 0.917 0.887 0.901 -M LM AM ?M • M M -M M M M M M M M M M M M Turning Movement Count Adams Traffic File Name : countrysideftelch (813) 763-7763 Site Code : 00004191 er W City/County: Clearwater/Pinellas Weather Clear Start Date 0811612004 N , Page No : 1 6 Gro ups Prin ted- Heavy Ve hides p COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARb BELCHER ROAD BELCHER ROAD Southbound Northbound Eastbound St-- e 04:Q0 PM _ Left 0 Thro Right _ 2 0. RTOR 0__. App. Total_ 2 Left Thro _ Rl ' RTOR App. Total Left ... -- - Thm Right . RTOR App. Total Int Total a 04:15 PM 0 6 0 0 6 7 3 4 8 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 . 7 . a. 7 .. . - 20 a 04.30 PM 0 5 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 D 4 6 0 4 21 04:45 PM 0 __ _ 4 0 0 4 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 7 0 6 15 a Total D 17 0 0 17? 15 16 . -_0 0 31 • 0 0 24 0 0 7 .. 16 24 72 Q 05:00 PM 0 6 0 0 6 3 4 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 . a 05:15 PM 0 3 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 7 20 a 05:30 PM 0 3 0 0 3 4 3 0 0 7 0 0 1 0 4 12 a _ 05:45 PM • 0 4 0 0 4 4 2 - 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 1 11 Total 0 16 0 0 16 i 3 12 0 0 _ 25 - 0 0 16 0 4 14 _ - . 16 57 Grand Total 0 33 0 0 33 28 28 0 0 56 0 0 40 0 Apprch % 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0 0 0 40 129 Total % 0.0 25.6 0.0 0.0 25.6 21.7 21.7 0.0 0.0 43.4 0.0 0.0 . 31.0 . 0.0 31.0 COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD BELCHER ROAD . -. BE LCHER ROAD Start Time Left Southbound Tanr RigM . RTOR Ape Total Left Thru - Northbound Right RTOR _ App. Total Left TAru Eastbound J%b - Peak Flour From 04.- PM to 05:45 Ph1 - Peak 1 of 1 " _ t RTOR App. Total Int. Total Intersection 04:00 PM . p Volume Percent 0 0.0 17 0 100.0 0.0 0 0.0 17 15 48.4 16 51 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 24 0 24 72 U1 04:15 Volume 0 6 0 0 6 3 . 8 . D . 0 11 0.0 0 0.0 100.0 0.0 Peak Factor 0 4 0 4 21 High fit 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 0.857 Volume 0 6 0 0 6 7 4 0 0 11 0 0 7 0 n Peak Factor 0.708 0 705 7 . 0.857 Peak Hour From D4:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM Volume 0 21 0 0 21 15 16 0 0 31 0 0 24 0 24 Percent D.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 48.4 59.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 100 0 0 0 High Int. 04:15 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM . . . Volume 0 6 0 0 6 7 4 0 0 11 0 0 7 0 7 Peak Factor 0.875 0 705 . 0,857 • b r ? m m 0 Ada.v -rra ff-C o, I rtc/ P.O. Box 997 Plant City, FL 33564 Tiel:(813) 763-7763 Fax:(813) 659-8688 Turning Movement Count Field Data Sheet Project No.: 6 yf Date: _ 8117 O?{ Count Times: Major Street: _ C61.c,ntjarj _ Direction: N-S Speed Limit: yo mph Minor Street: Direction: E-W Speed Limit: Z5 mph City/County: ?,' ?t a?rw ? (? n c yla s Weather, C( ear• Phasing: ?r ?L> 3 Cycles Measured: Zo S. 5V.P 6Z s . 53s, slr.P lt(Os, Z05- lgs. Zl s. q0S . slug - 15os. s14f 15 o s . Intersection Sketch (? S ' 3S' z ° S • l D l f, AM Lr -M r r r? r? rt r: r r r r r r r r r r Turning Movement Count Adams Traffic File Name :co untryside &oakneck (813) 763-7763 Site Code : 00 004191 City/County. Cle arwater/Pinellas Start Date : 08 11712004 Weather. Clear Page No : 1 - Group s Printed- Passen ger Vehicles - Heav y Vehi cles - U Turns COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD OAK NECK ROAD W CC•UN7RYSIDE BOULEVARD OAK NECK AOAD StatlTinte tell.. - Southbound Thru__ Flight__RFOR ?. rclal? LOt _ Tluu Westbound _Rt . RTOR Afk Tobl Left Thru Northbound RiQM?RTOR AD?Tota? Lett _Eastbound Thru ti ht RTOR 4 ?T t n 04:00 PM 10 150 55 7 222 0 3 2 4 9 _ 0 - 235 3 0 238_ 28 g - 4 , p oNa I t. Total 04:15 PM 11 167 52 4 234 3 2 0 3 8 0 203 3 0 206 28 0 Q 3 0 32 501 04:30 PM 10 132 4a 6 196. 3 8 2 5 f e 0 280 4 0 , 284 30 0 2 0 0 31 479 04:45 PM _ 4 142 46 _ 5 197 0 0 0 5 5 0 305 7 0 312 35 1 0 32 530 Total 35 591 201 22 849 6 13 4 1T _ 40- 1023 17 0 _ 1046 121 0 10 0 0- _ 36 _ 550 131 2060 05:00 PM 13 168 70 1 232 1 2 0 8 11 0 335 3 0 338 41 7 0 0 05:15 PM 11 132 62 4 209 1 4 0 10 15 0 372 8 0 380 35 3 0 48 ; 649 05:30 PM 16 122 65 7 210 1 2 0 4 7 0 336 7 0 343 30 0 3 38 642 05A5 PM 12 121 56 -* _ 5 194 _ 2 2 0 6 10 0 274 7 1 282 38 0 0 4 33 593 Total 52 253 54S 17 865 5 • 10 0 28 -.43... - 0-- 1311 -- 25 1 _ 1343 144 0 0 •'17 0 • - 42 .- -. 528 0 16f 2412 Grand Total 67 1134 454 39 1714 11 23 4 45 83 0 2340 42 1 2383 265 27 0 0 Apprch % 5.1 66.2 26.5 2.3 13.3 27.7 4.8 54.2 0.0 98.2 1.8 0.0 90.8 9 2 0 0 0 0 292 4472 Total % 1.9 25.4 10.2 0.9 38.3 02 0.5 0.1 1.0 1.9 0.0 52.3 0.9 0.0 53.3 5.9 . . . 0.6 0.0 0.0 6.5 COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD OAK NECK ROAD COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD OAK NECK ROAD _ _ _Start Time Lett Southbound Thru R33 ht RTOR /app Total _ ? Lett Westbound Thru - - R jM RTOR App. Taal Lefl_ Northbound Thru Right -A-TOR /s Total _ - f L Eastbound - T Peak liourFrorn 04:00 PM to 05:95 PM -Peak 1 of 1 _ pp _ _ e ! hru Right. RTCR A pp. 7ofal . Int. Total Intersection D4:45 PM . Volume Percent 44. 5.1 564 243 65.0 28 0 17 2 0 868 3 7 9 8 21 1 0 0 0 27 71 1 38 0 1348 25 0 1373 141 14 0 0 135 2434 05:00 Volume 13 . 166 70 . 1 252 . 1 , 2 . . 0 . 8 11 0.0 0 98.2 335 1.8 0.0 3 0 91.0 9-0 0.0 0.0 Peak Factor 338 41 7 0 0 48 649 High Int. 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05: 15 PM 05:00 PM 0.938 Volume 13 168 70 1 252 1 4 0 10 15 0 372 8 0 360 41 7 0 0 48 Peak Factor 0.861 0.633 0 903 . 0.807 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM t o 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM Volume 38 609 216 16 879 5 14 2 28 49 0 1348 25 0 1373 144 17 0 0 Percent 4.3 69.3 24.6 1.6 10.2 2116 4.1 57.1 0.0 98.2 1.8 0:0 89.4 10.6 0 0 0 0 High Int. 05:00 PM 04'30 PM 05:15 PM . . 05:00 PM Volume 13 168 70 1 252 3 8 2 5 18 0 372 8 0 380 41 7 0 0 Peak Factor 0.872 0.681 0.903 161 48 0.839 m N W N C9 a A 6 AM 'AM `i i i i! i! i! i! i! i! i Turning Movement Count Adams Traffic File Name : de&oalcnedk (813) 763-7763 Site Code : 0000419 City/County: ClearwatedPinellas Start Date : 0811712004 Weather. Clear Page No : 1 _ Groups Printed- Heavy Venictes COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD OAK NEUK ROAD COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARfl OAK NECK ROAD ---•- • -- Southbound - _ - _ Westbound _ _ Northbound Eastbound Start TimeLeR Thru Ri3At , RTOR_App. Total Left _ Thni Right RTOR . Ag Total Left - _ mru R4-W: _ _ RTOR A_pp. Total Left Thru Right R TOR App. Total : I Total 04:00 PM 2 3 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 D 2 0 0 . 2 - _ 0 . _ 0• 0 • 0 D -8 04:15 PM 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 2 12 04:30 Pfd 0 3 2 0 5 1 3 1 1 6' 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 13 -04:45PM_ 0 7 _ 0 0 7 - 0 0 0 . • 0 _.. 0 - 0 _- 6 0 7 0 - 6 0 0 0 0 0 13 Tots{ Z 16 3 0 JT 1 T 1 2 8 . Q 14 0 0 14 1 2 0 0 3?' "q6 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 D 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 05:15 PM 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 9 05:30 PM 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 05:45 PM 0 -- 3 0 ? 0 3_ _ 0 0 0 0 0 -' 0 2 0 0 2. 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total 0 9 1 0 10 Q 0 0 0 p 0 9 0 0 _ 1 '- ?1 Grand Total 2 25 4 0 31 1 4 1 2 8 0 23 1 0 24 2 2 0 0 4 67 Apprch % 6.5 80.6 12.9 0.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 25.0 0.1) 95.8 4.2 0.0 50.0 50.0 0 0 0 0 Total % 3.0 37.3 6.0 0.0 46.3 1.5 6.0 1.5 3.0 11.9 0.0 34.3 1.5 0.0 35.8 3.0 . . 3.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 COUNTRYSIDE BG IJLEVARO OAK NECK ROA5 COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD - OAK NECK ROAD Southbound Westbound N orthboun d Eastbound StartTime Let Thru Right RTOR. App. Total Lett . Thru - . Right _ RTOR. App. Total . Left Tbru * Right - RTCR App. Total " Left Au Rght RTOR App Total Int. Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM R5:45 PM - Peak 1 o11 . . . _ Intersection 04:00 PM Volume 2 16 3 0 21 1 4 1 2 8 0 14 0 0 14 1 2 D 0 3 46 Percent 9.5 76.2 14.3 0.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 25.0 0.0 1 00.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 66.7 0 0 0 0 04:45 Volume 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor 13 #iigh JnL 04:45 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 04:15 PM 0.885 Volume 0 7 0 0 7 1 3 1 1 6 0 6 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 2 Peak Factor 0.750 0.333 0.583 0.375 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:DD PM 04:00 PM 04 :00 PM 0 4:00 PM Volume 2 16 3 ' 0 21 1 4 1 2 8 0 14 0 0 14 1 2 0 0 3 Percent 9-5 76.2 14.3 0.0 12.5 50.0 12.5 25.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 33-3 66.7 0.0 0.0 High Int. 04:45 PM 04:30 PM • 04 :45 PM 04:15.PM Volume 0 7 0 0 7 1 3 1 1 6 0 6 0 0 6 1 1 0 0 2 Peak Factor 0.750 0.333 0.583 0.375 1 a u n 0 a r n c 0 08/23/2004 11:99 UlJbO7JUbUd ?Ada*yw 7'ra ff? o, I n.Ci ' P.O. Sox 997 Plant City, FL 33564 Tel:(813) 763-7763 Fax:(813) 659-8688 AVAMS IKHrrlu rhri7G U4 Project No.: Turning Movement Count Field Data Sheet Date: Count Times: - 6 Major Street: d< aUr?s AA Direction: E-W Speed Limit: mph Minor Street: e.") Direction: N-S Speed Limit: S mph City/County: C?ta,?wa.'?cyR V% Weather: Ot*-r Phasing: 3 Cycles Measured: AS VKf 24s Z2s. 5s. 355. - 110A 70-S SV. P Z3S Vs 45. 42s- 1101. Intersection Sketch Ibs. sU? f 22s. Zts. 10-S. 41S. - t t os. .r r ?r .r? •r .r r r :?r r r r¦ r it r r r r ?¦r Tuming Movement Count Adams Traffic He Name : us19&countryside (813) 763-7763 . Site Code :00004191 City/County: Clearwate r/Pinellas Start Date : 08/18/2004 Weather. Clear Page No : 1 _ M Groups Printed- Passenger ehiclees - Heavy Vehicles - U-Tums US 19 V COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD IJS 19 _ - -000NTRy DE BOUT ARD -- Southbound Westbound Northbound . Eastbound StartTime , left Tru _ _ R"ght _ RTOR App. Total j Leff • Thru Right; RTOR AFp- Total Left Thru ' ht c RTORRAA p Total*• _ •U Thn Ri h T ' n PM ' . . _ r g t R OR App Total t Total 04:00 73 14 7 28 122 49 107 21 15 192 49 27 17 39 132 76 207 _ • 5 8 294 740 04:15 PM 48 16 2 24 go; 54 110 34 6 204 ' 45 30 20 58 153. 74 200 13 7 204- 741 04:30 PM 79 16 10 31 136 42 117 26 23 208 41 26 12 47 126 71 244 9 4 328 r »04:45 PM 49 14 5 _ 41 109 _ ' 42 126 25 10 203 ' 58 21 8 56 143 70 252 14 0 798 336 791 Total 249 60 24 124 457 187 460 1 D6 54 807 193 104 57 200 554 291'- - 905 _ _ 41 17 -1252 - 3070 05:00 PM 99 24 8 30 161 51 108 23 13 195 50 33 21 40 144 88 260 10 0 358 858 05:15 PM 67 27 10 26 130 48 129 34 6 209 58 37 9 57 161 101 293 10 3 407 05:30 PM 60 18 12 33 123 59 114 27 5 205 63 29 17 45 154 100 274 9 2 907 05:45 PM 64 18 3 _ 26 • 111 45 100 31 3 179 42 31 14 39 126 91 278 16 4 385 867 Total 290 87 33 115 525 203 443 115 27 788 213 130 ' 67 187 585 366 1105 _ 45 9 389 805 5 - 1 39 3437 Grand Total 539 147 57 239 982 390 903 221 81 1595 406 234 118 381 1139 671 2008 86 26 2791 6507 Apprch % 54.9 15.0 5.8 24.3 24.5 56.6 13.9 5.1 35.6 20.5 10.4 33.5 24.0 71.9 3 1 0 9 Total % 8.3 2.3 0.9 3.7 15.1 6.0 13.9 3.4 12 24.5 6.2 3.6 1.8 5.9 17.5 10.3 30.9 . . 1.3 0.4 42.9 US 19 w COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARb _ US 19 COUNTFtYSIOE BOULEVARD Southbound Westbound - ` _ Northbound Eastbound Stall Time Left Thru .. i nc _ RTOR App. Tonal Lett Thru Right RTOR A?Total__ _ Left Thru Rk M RTOR Apps TotaE Left Thru : ht RTQR Ap T t l I Peak Hour From 04:00 PfA to 05.45 Ph- Peak 1 of t _ -- - - - . - p a o nt. Total _ Intersection 05:00 PM Volume 290 87 33 115 525 203 443 115 27 788 213 130 61 181 585 380 1105 45 9 Percent 55.2 16.6 6.3 21.9 • 25.8 56.2 14.6 3.4 36.4 22.2 10.4 30.9 24.7 71.8 2 9 0 6 1539• 3437 05:15 Volume 67 27 10 26 130 46 121 34 6 209 58 37 9 57 161 101 293 . . 10 Peak Factor 3 407 907 High Int. 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:15 PM 05:15 PM 0.947 Volume 99 24 8 30 161 48 121 34 6 209• 58 37 9 57 161 101 293 10 3 407 Peak Factor 0.815 0.943 0.906 0.945 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05.00 PM Volume 294 81 33 128 536 183 472 108 52 815 229 120 55 198 602 380 1105 45 9 1539 Percent 54.9 15.1 62 23.9 22.5 57.9 13.3 6.4 38.0 19.9 9.1 32.9 24.7 71.8 2.9 0 6 Kgh Int. 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:15 PM . 05:15 PM Votume 99 24 8 30 161 48 121 34 6 209 58 37 9 57 161 101 293 10 3 407 Peak Factor 0.832 0.975 0.935 0,946 Turning Movement Count ' Adams Traffic File Name : us19&countryside C •? (813) 763-7763 Site Code : 00004191 City/County. Cle arwate r/Pin ellas Weather. Clear Start Date 08/1812004 r c U Groins Printed- Hea vy Vefi iciea Page No c U918 OUNTRYSIDE 8OULEVA _D US 19 _ - - COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD - 8ta _ d Tme _ Southbound ; LeR Thru Ri M : RTOR Total -Lek-_ Thru Westbound Pig M FiTOR ^ Ap?otal Lent Northbound Thv -' _Rght' RTOR q? Total ' 'Left ' ?Thr? Eastbound Ri c 04:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 _ 1 _ 3 1 , 5 _ m I FiTOR ,??To?l_ Im fofai 04:15 PM 0 0 0 2 2. 0 2 2 1 5 1 2 2 0 3 8 1 2 2 5 0 0 3 11 1 04:30 PM 1 0 0 1 2i 2 3 0 2 i T' 2 1 0 0 , 3 0 2 . 0 a• 23 0 04:45 PM 1 0 0_ 0 1 _ 1 6 0 - 0 7 0 2 0 2 4 1 1 1 3 15 c Total 2 0 0 4 6 4 12 2 3 21 4? 8 -- 3 - 5 - 20- 1 0 3 15 2- - j - ' 17 -, -sq F c 05:00 PM 3 0 p 1 4 2 1 1 2 6 1 0 0 1 2 0 4 D c 05:15 PM 1 0 2 0 3; 0 2 2 0 4 2 4 0 2 8 2 1 0 4 16 a 05:30 PM 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 1 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 3.' 18 a _05:45 PM 0 0 0 1 . 1 0 2 - 0 1 3 1 1 1 0 3 3 0 0 3 10 0 Total 4 0 2 3 9 3 6 4 3 -- _74 --6 " - -I- 6 - _. 5 -12 0 0 8 15 _ 0_ _? - - 15 --- - T8 5T Total Grand 6 0 2 7 15 7 20 6 6 39 9 13 4 8 34 10 22 2 Approh 9G 40.0 0.0 13.3 46.7 17.9 51.3 15A 15.4 26.5 38.2 11.8 23.5 28 6 62 9 1 35 123 5 7 Total % 4.9 0.0 1.6 5.7 12.2 5.7 16.3 4.9 4.9 31.7 7.3 10.6 3.3 6.5 27.6 . 8 1 . 17 9 . 2.9 1 6 . . , 0.8 28,5 ?- US 19 S hb - - 6 NTRYSIDE 8OULEVARD US 19 y - -- COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVA Sled Time Le(1 out ound Thru R?gM_ RTOR _ !P Total _ Left Westbound Thru Right _RTOR _ App. Tatai Le4t Northbound Tf,ru R RTOR -App ToFaf _' Lef! eft RD _Eastbound _ _Th R Peak Hour Fran 04:00 PM to 05:95 PA1-Peak 1 d 1 _ _ . -L -. ru -. , ih1._ RTOR : Abp. Tahal fnt Total C Intersection 04:15 PM . -" - " Volume 5 0 0 4 9 5 12 3 5 25 4 5 2 6 17 3 12 2 3 u Percent 55.6 0.0 0.0 44.4 20.0 48.0 12.0 20.0 23.5 29.4 11.8 35.3 16 7 66 7 1 18 69 04:15 Volume 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 1 5 1 2 2 3 . . 11.1 5.6 Peak Factor 8 2 5 1 0 6 23 T Ngfi Irn 05:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:15 PM 0415 PM 0.750 Volume 3 0 0 1 4 2 3 0 2 7. 1 2 2 3 8 2 C_ Peak Factor 0.563 0.893- 0 531 5 1 0 8: . . 0.563 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:30 PM 04:15 PM ' 04:00 PM 04:15 PM Volvme 6 0 2 2 10 5 12 3 5 25 4 5 3 5 20 3 12 Percent 60.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 48.0 12.0 20.0 20.0 40.0 15.0 25.0 16 7 66 7 High Int. 05:00 PM 04:30 PM 10415 PM . . 04:15 PM Volume 3 0 0 1 4; 2 3 0 2 7 1 2 2 3 8 2 5 Peak Factor 0.625 0.893 0.625 1 2 1 18 11.1 5.8 1 0 8t 0.563. •08/23/2004 11:09 8136598688 Adayrte rra fl!4 I rLG, ' P.O. Box 997 Plant City, FL 33564 Tel:(813) 763-7763 Fax.(813) 659-8688 Date: Major Street: Minor Street: City/County: 3 Cycles Measured: 1 Intersection Sketch ADAMS TRAFFIC PAGE 05 Project No.: Turning Movement Count Field Data Sheet t bt4 Count Times: q- pm t tuarci. Direction: E-W Speed Limit: 0 mph d Direction: N-S Speed limit: 35 mph Lk4p4wattr 1 ?Ac&.c Weather: CIIC4 r- Phasing: L 3o s. go%. - 116sr s• 80s - ltos. ko col ? Cc? ? 4z N A-V Qrd?es?s, ?•dQ C ..,r -A, Case 4 ? M M 0 Turning Movement Count Adams Traffic File Name : countryside&enterprise m • N (813) 763476 3 Site Code :0004191 City/County: Clearwater[Pinellas Start Date : 08111/2004 i Weather. Clear Page No : 1 m - Groups Printed- Passenger Vehicles - Heavy Vehicles - U-Turns p ENTERPRISE ROAD COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD ENTERPFttSE ROAD _ - COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD Southbound Westbound - Northbound Eas?u Start Time 04 00 09 Left --b' T6 Right RTOR . A alal l ell _ Ttttu Right RTOR App_ Total Left Thru . q: 1 _ RTOR Ap -Otal - Left --7Mu Right RTOR App Tatat Inf Total : 6 B 9 32 16 739 13 2 170 33 1 7 14 f3 _ 67 14 . •242 - 15 O -_ 276 545 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 12 4 9 9 11 6 14 12 44, 33' t3 12 161 156 11 5 0 3 . 185. 176 36 10 13 14 73. 21 232 16 7 276. 578 04A5 PM 9 _ 6 11 2 28 6 177 5 4 194 39 46 7 10 12 19 8 16 68 91 5 10 297 19 1 299 322 597 Total 34 32 :Y 37 137 49 633 _ 34 9 _ 725• 154 34 _ '5j- - 51 _ 297 50 27 1 X070 - 77 - 14 337 1211- 650 -2 70 a 05:00 PM 6 10 14 14 44 8 168 8 0 184 54 19 23 15 111 12 340 24 0 376 a 05:15 PM 11 6 4 12 33 7 158 2 0 167 39 6 11 11 67 14 372 16 2 715 am 05.30 PM 5 5 5 14 29 6 167 12 1 186 42 a 29 13 92 20 345 22 4 404 671 y 05:45 PM - 7 -2 10 3 -_ 11 _ 31 _ 7 - 133 . 2 0 142 32 . ' 13 15 11 71 13 318 17 2 391 350 698 00 Total 9 31 26 51 137 28 626 24 1 679 167 46 _ 78 50 -341'-' 59 _ 1375•- •79 8 1520 594 2fi78 Grand Total 63 63 60 88 274 77 1259 58 10 1404 321 80 136 101 638 109 2445 156 22 2732 Apprcn % 23.0 23.0 21.9 32.1 5.5 89.7 4.1 0.7 50.3 12.5 21.3 15.8 4 0 89 5 3 7 0 8 5048 Total % 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.7 5.4 1.5 24.9 1.1 0.2 27.8 6.4 1.6 2.7 2.0 12.6 . 22 . . . 48.4 3.1 0.4 54.1 ENTERPRISE ROAD COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD ENTERPRISE ROAD - COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVA RD wTime Left Southbound I Thin R ht RTOR App. Total _ Left Westbound Thru- Right RTOR Total Left Northbound 7hru Right RTOR Total A Lest as n Th i _ Peak Hour FromM-00 PM to 05.45 PM'• Peak 1 or 1 ._ _ _ _ pp. ro t2ight R OR_ A? Total . Int. Total D Intersection 04:45 PM ty Volume Percent 31 23.1 27 34 20.1 25.4 42 31 3 134 29 4 0 670 91 7 27 3 7 5 0 7 731 181 43 82 55 361 56 1356 89 7 1508 2734 3 to 05:00 Volume 6 10 14 . 14 44 . 8 . 168 . 8 . 0 184 50.1 54 11.9 19 22.7 23 152 15 3.7 89.9 5.9 0.5 -4 Peak Factor 111 12 340 24 0 376 715 ?? High Int. 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:95 PM 0. 956 n H Volume Peak Factor 6 t0 14 14 44 0 761 8 177 5 4 194 54 19 23 15 111 14 372 16 2 404 n . 0.942 0.813 0.933 Peak Flour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 BY Approach 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM Volume 31 36 40 42 149 41 662 29 7 739 181 43 82 55 361 59 1375 79 8 1521 Percent 20.8 24.2 26.8 282 5.5 89.6 3.9 0.9 50.1 11.9 22.7 15.2 3.9 90 4 5 2 0 5 High Int. 04:15 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05: 15 PM . . . Volume Peak Factor 12 9 9 14 44 847 0 8 177 5 4 194 54 19 23 15 111 14 372 i6 2 404 . 0.952. 0,813 0.941 .D D M ' m m ?p Turning Movement Count Adams Traffic (813) 763-7763 City/County. Clearwater/Pinellas Weather. Clear ENTERPRISE ROAD __ - Southbound StattT7ine___ Lei Thru Ri3h1 RTOR_ App. Total_ 04:Ob PM 0 1 0 2 3 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM a 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 1 0 1 _ __ Total---' 0 1 1 2 4 05:00 PM 0 0 0 1 1 05:15 PM 0 D 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 2 0 1 3 Grand Total 0 3 1 3 7 Apprch % 0.0 42.9 14.3 42.9 Total % 0.0 Z7 0.9 2.7 6.2 Groups Printed- Heavy Vehicles COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD ENTERPRISE ROAD _ Westbou nd Northbound Left Thru Right. R70R App Total _ Left _ Thru _ Right R_TOR _A?p. Total 0 T 0 a 7 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 3 1 4 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 I 19 0 0 ZO 3 3 0 0 6 0 5 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 o 6 f 0 7 0 0 a 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 . 0 1 0 0 1 0 22 2 0 24 ..1 1 0. _ 0 Z 1 41 2 0 44 4 4 0 0 8 2:3 93.2 4.5 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 36.3 1.8 0.0 38.9 3.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 7.1 File Name : countryside&enterprise Site Code : 00004191 Start Date : 08111/2004 Page No : 1 COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVAitb Eastbound Leff _ Thru RIRhI RTOR App. Totat. Inf. Total 0 2 2 0 4 16 0 5 0 0 8 14 D 7 2 0 9 15 0 6 0 0 6 12 a 23 4 6 -.27 -:57 0 6 0 0 6 14 0 7 0 0 7 14 0 6 1 0 7 18 0 5 2 0 7 10 0. 24 3 0 27' 56 0 47 7 a 54 113 0.0. 87.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 41.6 62 0.0 47.8 ENTERPRISE ROAD COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD ENTERPRISE ROAD _ COUNTRYSIDE BOULEVARD Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start rime Lett Thru Right , RTOR ' App. Total _.Left. TMu R_ ight RTOR App. Total Left Thru Rlghl . RTOR App. Total Left Thru Right * RTOR App Total Int. Total Peak H our Fran 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM- Peak 1 of 1 , Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 2 1 1 4 0 25 2 0 27 1 0 0 0 1 0 25 1 0 26 58 Percent 0.0 50.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 92.6 7.4 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 96.2 3.8 0.0 05:30 Volume 0 2 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 7 18 Peak Factor 0 806 High Int: 05:30 PM 05:30 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM . Volume 0 2 0 0 2 0 9 0 0 9 . 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 7 Peak Factor 0.500 0.750 0.250 0.929 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 o f 1 By Approach 04:00 PM 04:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM Volume 0 1 1 2 4 0 25 2 0 27 3 3 0 0 6 0 27 2 0 29 Percent 0.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 0.0 92.6 7.4 0.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.1 6.9 0.0 High Int 04:00 PM 05:30 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM Volume 0 1 0 2 3 0 9 0 0 9 1 2 0 0 3 0 7 2 0 9 Peak Factor 0.333 D.750 0.500 0.806 1 ' Print Date: Aug/24/2004 Florida Department of Transportation Transportation Statistics Office 2003 Peak Season Factor Category Report INELLAS COUNTYWIDE k MOCF 0 94 ategory* 1500 Week Dates SF . PSCF 1 01/01/2003 - 01/04/2003 1.05 1.12 ' 2 01/05/2003 - 01/11/2003 1.05 1.12 3 01/12/2003 - 01/18/2003 1.05 1.12 4 01/19/2003 - 01/25/2003 1.03 1.10 5 01/26/2003 - 02/01/2003 1.00 1.06 6 02/02/2003 - 02/08/2003 0.98 1.04 * 7 02/09/2003 - 02/15/2003 0.96 1.02 * 8 02/16/2003 - 02/22/2003 0.95 1.01 * 9 02/23/2003 - 03/01/2003 0.94 1.00 * 10 03/02/2003 - 03/08/2003 0.93 0.99 * 11 03/09/2003 - 03/15/2003 0.93 0.99 * 12 03/16/2003 - 03/22/2003 0.93 0.99 * 13 03/23/2003 - 03/29/2003 0.93 0.99 * 14 03/30/2003 - 04/05/2003 0.93 0.99 15 04/06/2003 - 04/12/2003 0.93 0.99 * 16 04/13/2003 - 04/19/2003 0.94 1.00 * 17 04/20/2003 - 04/26/2003 0.95 1.01 * 18 04/27/2003 - 05/03/2003 0.96 1.02 * 19 05/04/2003 - 05/10/2003 0.97 1.03 20 05/11/2003 - 05/17/2003 0.98 1.04 21 05/18/2003 - 05/24/2003 0.99 1.05 22 05/25/2003 - 05/31/2003 0.99 1.05 23 06/01/2003 - 06/07/2003 1.00 1.06 24 06/08/2003 - 06/14/2003 1.00 1.06 25 06/15/2003 - 06/21/2003 1.01 1.07 26 06/22/2003 - 06/28/2003 1.00 1.06 27 06/29/2003 - 07/05/2003 1.00 1.06 28 07/06/2003 - 07/12/2003 1.00 1.06 ' 29 07/13/2003 - 07/19/2003 1.00 1.06 30 07/20/2003 - 07/26/2003 1.00 1.06 31 07/27/2003 - 08/02/2003 1.00 1.06 32 08/03/2003 - 08/09/2003 1.01 1.07 33 08/10/2003 - 08/16/2003 1.01 1.07 34 08/17/2003 - 08/23/2003 1.02 1.09 35 08/24/2003 - 08/30/2003 1.03 1.10 36 08/31/2003 - 09/06/2003 1.04 1.11 37 09/07/2003 - 09/13/2003 1.04 1.11 38 09/14/2003 - 09/20/2003 1.05 1.12 ' 39 09/21/2003 - 09/27/2003 1.04 1.11 40 09/28/2003 - 10/04/2003 1.04 1.11 41 10/05/2003 - 10/11/2003 1.03 1.10 ' 42 10/12/2003 - 10/18/2003 1.02 1.09 43 10/19/2003 - 10/25/2003 1.03 1.10 44 10/26/2003 - 11/01/2003 1.03 1.10 45 11/02/2003 - 11/08/2003 1.04 1.11 ' 46 11/09/2003 - 11/15/2003 1.04 1.11 47 11/16/2003 - 11/22/2003 1.04 1.11 48 11/23/2003 - 11/29/2003 1.05 1.12 ' 49 11/30/2003 - 12/06/2003 1.05 1.12 50 12/07/2003 - 12/13/2003 1.05 1.12 51 12/14/2003 - 12/20/2003 1.05 1.12 52 12/21/2003 - 12/27/2003 1.05 1.12 53 12/28/2003 - 12/31/2003 1.05 1.12 i .4 z? Note: ""indicates peak season week Page 1 Total Traffic Determination Sheet Intersection Thru Northbound Count I Percent Date Trucks Street (SR 580) at Count 169 421 192 258 1390 374 171 921 125 397 1326 108 8/11/2004 2.6% Belcher Road 2004 Pk Season 181 450 205 276 1487 400 183 985 134 425 1419 116 Growth to 2007 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 2007 Background 192 477 218 293 1577 424 194 1045 142 450 1504 122 Project 9 0 1 10 2007 Total 192 477 218 293 1577 424 203 1045 143 450 1514 122 Main Street (SR 580) at Count 19 2027 4 0 0 51 0 1739 47 8/11/2004 2.7% Enterprise Road 2004 Pk Season - - 20 2169 4 0 0 55 0 1861 50 Growth to 2007 - - 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 2007 Background - - - 22 2299 5 0 0 58 0 1972 53 Project - 6 1 10 2007 Total - - - 22 2299 5 0 0 64 0 1973 63 Countryside Boulevard at Count 31 27 156 29 670 32 181 43 137 56 1356 96 8/11/2004 2.1% Enterprise Road 2004 Pk Season 33 29 167 31 717 34 194 46 147 60 1451 103 Growth to 2007 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 2007 Background 35 31 177 33 760 36 205 49 155 64 1538 109 Project 8 0 0 26 18 0 1 0 5 0 2007 Total 43 31 177 33 786 54 205 50 155 64 1543 109 Countryside Boulevard at Count 44 644 260 3 8 27 0 1348 25 141 14 0 8/17/2004 1.9% Oak Neck Road 2004 Pk Season 48 702 283 3 9 29 0 1469 27 154 15 0 Growth to 2007 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 2007 Background 51 744 300 3 9 31 0 1557 29 163 16 0 Project 17 13 2007 Total 51 761 300 3 9 31 0 1570 29 163 16 0 Countryside Boulevard at Count 290 87 148 203 443 142 213 130 242 380 1105 54 8/18/2004 2.0% US 19 Ramps 2004 Pk Season 316 95 161 221 483 155 232 142 264 414 1204 59 Growth to 2007 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 2007 Background 335 101 171 235 512 164 246 150 280 439 1277 62 Project 14 15 15 4 5 4 2007 Total 335 101 185 235 527 164 261 150 280 443 1282 66 Belcher Rd/ Count 0 739 0 - - - 843 1315 0 0 0 490 8/18/2004 2.2% Countryside Blvd at 2004 Pk Season 0 806 0 - - 919 1433 0 0 0 534 Belcher Rd (NW leg) Growth to 2007 6% 6% 6% - - - 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 2007 Background 0 854 0 - - - 974 1519 0 0 0 566 Project 17 - - - 21 13 2007 Total 0 871 0 - 995 1532 0 0 0 566 Source: FDC Date: 12-23-04 T:\169\Traffic\[Tables.xls]S heet 1 Total Traffic Determination Sheet (Continued) Intersection Thru Enterprise Road at 2007 Background 0 232 0 - - 0 149 0 0 0 0 Drive 1 Project 0 0 10 - 19 0 0 6 0 8 2007 Total 0 232 10 - - - 19 149 0 6 0 8 Countryside Boulevard 2007 Background 0 0 0 0 1083 0 - - - 0 1711 0 Drive 2 Project 5 0 10 0 8 16 - - 13 0 0 2007 Total 5 0 10 0 1091 16 - 13 1711 0 Countryside Boulevard 2007 Background 0 0 0 0 1083 0 - - - 0 0 0 Drive 3 Project 0 0 7 0 10 15 - - - 0 0 0 2007 Total 0 0 7 0 1093 15 - 0 0 0 Belcher Road at 2007 Background 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1381 0 - - - Drive 4 Project 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 21 - - 2007 Total 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1381 21 - - Source: FDC Date: 12-23-04 T:\169\Traffic\[Tables.xls]Sheeti T HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Belcher/Countryside at Belcher ' Agency: FDC Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/24/2004 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2004 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Belcher Road (NW leg) N/S St: Belcher Road/ Countryside Blvd SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I I I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 ' No. Lanes I 0 0 2 1 I I I 0 0 0 I 2 0 0 I 0 3 0 1 LGConfig I R I I L I T Volume I 534 I 1919 1 718 I Lane Width ( 12.0 I 112.0 I 12.0 1 RTOR Vol 1 0 I 1 I 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left A A Thru ( Thru ' Right A I Right Peds I Peds WB Left I SB Left ' Thru 1 Thru A Right 1 Right Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right ' SB Right 1 WB Right Green 35.0 25.0 30.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 105.0 secs Intersect ion Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Lastnouna - 30.4 C ' R 929 2787 0.60 0.33 30.4 C Westbound ' Northbound L 1459 3433 0.66 0.57 24.3 C ' 24.3 C Southbound T 1211 5085 0.62 0.24 36.8 D 36.8 D Intersection Delay = 29.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SM V Inter.: Countryside at Oak Neck Agency: FDC Area Type: All othe r areas Date: 8/2 4/2004 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2004 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Oak Neck Road N/S St: Countryside Boulevard SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound ( Southbound L T R I I L T R I L T R I I L T R I I ' No. Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 3 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I TR I L TR Volume 1154 15 0 13 9 29 1 1469 27 148 615 283 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 ' RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left Thru A 1 Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds ( Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 30.0 55.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 ' All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Leng th: 95.0 Intersec tion Per formance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratio s Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 430 1362 0.38 0.32 25.8 C TR 588 1863 0.03 0.32 22.4 C 25.5 C Westbound L 440 1392 0.01 0.32 22.3 C ' TR 520 1646 0.08 0.32 22.9 C 22.8 C Northbound ' TR 2044 3530 0.77 0.58 17.1 B 17.1 B Southbound L 82 141 0.62 0.58 26.9 C TR 2805 4845 0.34 0.58 10.5 B 11.4 B Intersection Delay = 15.7 (sec/veh) Intersec tion LOS = B secs I A- 2_4 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Countryside at Enterprise Agency: FDC Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/24/2004 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2004 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Countryside Boulevard N/S St: Enterprise Road SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R 1 I 1 I No. Lanes 1 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR Volume 160 1451 103 131 717 34 1194 46 147 133 29 81 ' Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds ' WB Left A A 1 SB Left A Thru A I 'Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 10.0 55.0 30.0 ' Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 112.0 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS M tastnouna L 436 TR 2473 Westbound L 232 TR 2480 Northbound ' L 340 TR 442 Southbound 1770 0.14 0.63 8.9 A 5035 0.66 0.49 22.1 C 21.7 C 1770 0.14 0.63 12.4 B 5051 0.32 0.49 17.3 B 1271 0.60 0.27 38.7 D 1649 0.46 0.27 35.0- C L 268 1001 0.13 TR 444 1658 0.26 Intersection Delay = 23.0 secs 17.1 B 36.9 D 0.27 31.3 C 0.27 32.6 C 32.3 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Countryside at US 19 Ramps ' Agency: FDC Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/24/2004 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2004 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Countryside Boulevard N/S St: US 19 Ramps SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R i I I I No. Lanes 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L T I L T Volume 1414 1204 59 1221 483 155 1232 142 1316 95 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas ' Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A I Thru A ,. Right A I Right Peds 1 Peds WB Left A 1 SB Left A A ' Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right Peds 1 Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 15.0 45.0 10.0 20.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0- 2.0 Cycle Leng th: 110.0 secs Interse ction Per formance Summ ary ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratio s Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 468 3433 0,93 0.14 72.6 E TR 1438 3514 0.92 0.41 41.2 D 49.0 D ' Westbound L 468 3433 0.50 0.14 44.8 D ' TR 1395 3410 0.48 0.41 24.2 C 29.5 C Northbound L 625 3433 0.39 0.32 28.1 C T 339 1863 0.44 0.18 40.9 D 32.9 C Southbound L 550 3433 0.61 0.32 30.6 C T 339 1863 0.29 0.18 39.4 D 32.6 C Intersection Delay = 40.1 (sec/veh) Intersec tion LOS = D A- 2,6 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Main St (SR 580) at Belcher Rd ' Agency: FDC Area Type: All other areas Date: 8/24/2004 Jurisd• County Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2004 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Main Street (SR 580) N/S St: Belcher Road ' SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I No. Lanes ( 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1425 1419 116 1276 1487 400 1183 985 134 1181 450 205 ' Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 ' Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A 1 NB Left A A ' Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds ' WB Left A A 1 SB Left A A Thru A I Thru A Right A i Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right I EB Right SB Right 1 WB Right Green 10.0 40.0 10.0 35.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ' Appr/ Lane Grp Lane Group Capacity Cycle Length: 117.0 -Intersection Performance Summary . Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound L 904 3400 0.49 T 1722 5036 0.87 ' R 536 1568 0.23 Westbound L 865 3400 0.34 T 1722 5036 0.91 ' R 536 1568 0.79 Northbound L 353 1752 0.55 T 1049 3505 0.99 R 469 1568 0.30 Southbound L 213 1752 0.90 T 1049 3505 0.45 R 469 1568 0.46 Interse ction Delay = 42.9 A 0.47 25.2 C 0.34 41.0 D 36.8 D 0.34 27.7 C 0.47 23.3 C 0.34 44.3 D 41.2 D 0.34 42.2 D 0.43 24.3 C 0.30 65.7 E 56.4 E 0.30 31.9 C 0.43 63.7 E 0.30 33.5 C 40.2 D 0.30 34.0 C (sec/v eh) Inters ection LOS = D secs ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: SMV Agency/Co.: FDC Date Performed: 8/24/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction: County ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year. . 2004 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 East/West Street: Main Street (SR 580) North/South Street: Enterprise Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 ' L T R I L T Volume 0 1241 50 20 1446 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1306 52 . 21 1522 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 0.25 6 R 4 0.95 4 Median Type/Storage TWLTL ' RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' L T R I L T R Volume 74 2 55 ' Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 77 2 57 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ' Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage No Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L L I LTR 1 v (vph) 0 21 136 C(m) (vph) 428 497 190 v/c 0.00 0.04 0.72 ' 95% queue length 0.00 0.13 4.52 Control Delay 13.4 12.6 61.0 LOS B B F Approach Delay 61.0 ' Approach LOS F A --7 Z HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Belcher/Countryside at Belcher Agency: FDC Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/13/2004 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Belcher Road (NW leg) N/S St: Belcher Road/ Countryside Blvd SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound ( Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 1 -- --------1-------------- 1------ No. Lanes I 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 I 2 0 0 I 0 3 0 I LGConfig I R I I L I T I Volume I 566 I 1995 I 871 Lane Width I 12.0 I 112.0 I 12.0 I RTOR Vol I 0 I 1 I I Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 EB Left I NB Left A A Thru I Thru Right A 1 Right Peds I Peds WB Left I SB Left Thru 1 Thru A Right I Right Peds I Peds ' NB Right I EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 35.0 25.0 30.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 105.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary ----- -- ---- ---- - ' Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS ' Eastbound 31.2 C R 929 2787 0.64 0.33 31.2 C Westbound Northbound L 1504 3433 0.70 0.57 25.1 C 25.1 C Southbound ' T 1211 5085 0.76 0.24 40.0 D 40.0 D Intersection Delay = 31.9 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C 1 ?-?9 ' HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Countrys ide at Oak Neck ' Agency: FDC Area Type: All o ther areas Date: 10/13/200 4 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak H our Year : 2007 Project ID: Count ryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Oak Neck Road N/S St: Countrys ide Boulevard SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ' I Eas tbound I Westbound I Northbound I -Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes I 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 I 0 2 0 I 1 3 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I TR I L TR Volume 1163 16 0 13 9 31 1 1570 29 151 761 300 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 ' RTOR Vol I 0 I 0 I 0 ( 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type All other areas ? Signal Operations____ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A I NB Left Thru A I Thru A Right A ( Right A Peds I Peds WB Left A I SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds I Peds NB Right 1 EB Right SB Right I WB Right Green 30.0 55.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 95.0 -Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach ' Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/C g/C Delay LOS - Delay LOS Eastbound L 429 1359 0.40 0.32 26.1 C TR 588 1863 0.03 0.32 22.5 C 25.8 C t Westbound L 439 1390 0.01 0.32 22.3 C ' TR 519 1643 0.08 0.32 22.9 C 22.8 C Northbound TR 2043 3529 0.82 0.58 19.0 B 19.0 B Southbound L 78 135 0.69 0.58 37.2 D TR 2819 4869 0.40 0.58 11.0 B 12.2 B Intersection Delay = 16.9 (sec/veh) Intersec tion LOS = B secs 1 t?-3o HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Countryside at Enterprise Agency: FDC Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/13/2004 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak Hour Year : 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Countryside Boulevard N/S St: Enterprise Road _-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes I 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 I 1 1 0 I 1 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR I L TR I L TR Volume 164 1543 109 133 786 54 1205 50 155 143 31 177 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol I 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas --Signal Operations _ Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A A I NB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A I Right A Peds 1 Peds WB Left A A 1 SB Left A Thru A I Thru A Right A 1 Right A Peds 1 Peds NB Right EB Right ' SB Right I WB Right Green 10.0 55.0 35.0 Yellow 3.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Len the 117 0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity g -Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 380 1770 0.18 0.60 10.9 B TR 2367 5035 0.73 0.47 26.3 C 25.7 C Westbound L 215 1770 0.16 0.60 15.6 B TR 2367 5036 0.37 0.47 20.0+ C 19.9 B Northbound L 293 980 0.74 0.30 46.3 D TR 494 1652 0.44 0.30 33.7 C 40.0 D Southbound L 296 989 0.15 ' TR 486 1625 0.45 Intersection Delay = 26.5 0.30 30.3 C 0.30 33.9 C 33.3 C (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C secs A- ?? HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Countryside at US 19 Ramps Agency: FDC Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/8/2004 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak Hour Revised Year : 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 E/W St: Countryside Boulevard N/S St: US 19 Ramps SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY - I Eastbound 1 Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound I L T R I L T R L T R I L T R --1--- --- - ------ --1 No. Lanes 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 LGConfig I L TR I L TR L T I L T Volume 1443 1282 66 1235 527 164 1261 150 1335 101 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 1 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas -Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A 1 NB Left A A Thru A 1 Thru A Right A ( Right Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A A ' Thru A Thru A Right A Right Peds 1 Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 23.0 50.0 10.0 17.0 Yellow 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Cycle Length: 120.0 secs Intersection Performance Summary _ Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach - Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/-C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound ---- L 658 3433 0.71 0.19 48.9 D TR 1464 3513 0.97 0.42 50.8 D 50.3 D Westbound L 658 3433 0.38 0.19 42.6 D TR 1422 3413 0.51 0.42 26.3 C 30.4 C Northbound L 507 3433 0.54 0.27 36.5 D T 264 1863 0.60 0.14 52.0 D 42.2 D Southbound L 515 3433 0.69 0.27 43.0 D T 264 1863 0.40 0.14 47.9 D 44.1 D _ Interse ction Delay = 43.5 (sec/v eh) Inters ection LOS = D A, ? -t- HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1d Analyst: SMV Inter.: Main St (SR 580) at Belcher Rd Agency: FDC Area Type: All other areas Date: 10/8/2004 Jurisd: County Period: PM Peak Hour Revised Year : 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 1 E/W St: Main Street (SR 580) N/S St: Belcher Road __SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY ------- - --- ---- 1 Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound 1 L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R No. Lanes 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 I 1 2 1 LGConfig I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R Volume 1450 1514 122 1293 1577 424 1203 1045 143 1192 477 218 1 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 RTOR Vol 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Duration 0.25 E Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru Right Peds WB Left A ' Thru Right Peds NB Right SB Right Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations - 2 3 4 1 A I NB Left A I Thru A 1 Right I Peds A 1 SB Left A I Thru A I Right I Peds I EB Right 1 WB Right 5 6 A A A A A A A A 7 8 Green 5.0 45.0 14.0 44.0 1 Yellow 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 All Red 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 C 1 L 4- 1, 130 0 Appr/ Lane Lane Group Grp Capacity yc e eng --Intersection Performance Summary______ Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate _ -__ _- (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound L 776 3400 0.61 T 1743 5036 0.91 R 543 1568 0.24 Westbound L 734 3400 0.42 T 1743 5036 0.95 ' R 543 1568 0.82 Northboun d L 416 1752 0.51 t T 1186 3505 0.93 R 531 1568 0.28 Southboun d L 246 1752 0.82 T 1186 3505 0.42 R 531 1568 0.43 Interse ction Delay = 45.7 0.42 32.7 C 0.35 48.6 D 44.1 D 0.35 30.5 C 0.42 27.8 C 0.35 53.6 D 49.4 D 0.35 48.6 D 0.48 21.9 C 0.34 53.9 D 47.0 D 0.34 31.8 C 0.48 54.4 D 0.34 33.4 C 38.1 D 0.34 33.9 C (sec/veh) Inters ection LOS = D secs 73 HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: SMV Agency/Co.: FDC Date Performed: 10/8/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour w/NB Right Intersection: PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction: County Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 East/West Street: Main Street (SR 580) North/South Street: Enterprise Road Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 _ -Vehicle Volu mes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eas tbound Westbound - Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 -- --- - L - T R I L T R Volume 0 - 1973 63 22 2299 5 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 095 095 0.95 095 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 2076 66 23 2420 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 RT Channelized? ' Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration L T TR L T TR -- - ' Upstream -Signal? -- - No No Minor Street: Approach Nor - thbound - - -- Southbound -- --- Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R Volume 64 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 67 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration R `?NNiva?. ai Movement Lane Config v (vph) -------- C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length t Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L L I R 0 23 67 189 245 215 0.00 0.09 0.31 0.00 0.31 1.27 24.0 21.2 29.1 C C D 29.1 D 4_?? ' HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ----------- Analyst: SMV Agency/Co.: FDC Date Performed: 12/23/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction: County ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 East/West Street: Drive 1 North/South Street: Enterprise Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 __ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments____ _ Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I L T R Volume 19 149 232 10 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 156 244 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage Undivided / ' RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 1 0 Configuration L T TR ' Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound -- Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 6 8 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 6 8 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 ' Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound ' Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 Lane Config L L 12 R v (vph) 20 6 C(m) (vph) 1311 562 v/c 0.02 0.01 95% queue length 0.05 0.03 Control Delay 7.8 11.5 LOS A B Approach Delay 10.4 ' Approach LOS B 8 790 0.01 0.03 9.6 A A -3s HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: SMV Agency/Co.: FDC Date Performed: 12/23/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction: County Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 East/West Street: Drive 2 North/South Street: Countryside Boulevard Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 _ Vehicle Volumes and Adjustme nts Major Street: Approach Eastbound _ Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 ' L T R I - L T R Volume 13 1711 1091 16 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 13 1801 1148 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- -- -- Median Type/Storage TWLTL / 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 2 0 Configuration L T T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound - Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 5 10 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 5 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 ' Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R ---Delay, Queue Length, and Level o f Service Approach EB WB Northbound ______ Southb _ ound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L I ------------ - -------------- I L R v (vph) --------- v vph 1 3 --- -------- 5 - --- 10 C(m) (vph) 596 155 456 v/c 0.02 0.03 0.02 ' 95% queue length 0.07 0.10 0.07 Control Delay 11.2 29.0 13.1 LOS B D B Approach Delay 18 .4 Approach LOS C /4-3? HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY ' Analyst: SMV Agency/Co.: FDC ' Date Performed: 10/13/2004 Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction: County ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year: 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 ' East/West Street: Drive 3 North/South Street: Countryside Boulevard Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 ' L T R I L T 6 R Volume 1093 15 ' Peak-Hour Factor, PHF -- -- 095 095 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1150 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage TWLTL ' RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? - No No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ' L T R I L T R Volume 7 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 7 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (o) 0 0 Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage Lanes 1 Configuration R Delay Queue Length and Level of Service ' -FFlvGl 1.11 Movement Lane Config v (vp h) ------- C (m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 0.25 12.1 B 7 513 0.01 0.04 12.1 B -37 EB WB Northbound Southbound 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 I I R HCS2000: Unsignalized Intersections Release 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Analyst: SMV Agency/Co.: FDC Date Performe d: 9/28/2004 ' Analysis Time Period: PM Peak Hour Intersection: PM Peak Hour Jurisdiction: County ' Units: U. S. Customary Analysis Year : 2007 Project ID: Countryside Exec. Golf Course - 169 East/West Str eet: Drive 4 North/South S treet: Belcher Road Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 _-Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments_ Major Street: __-----_ Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 -- L T R 1 L T R Volume 1381 21 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 ' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1453 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type/Storage Undivided / ' RT Channelized? Lanes 2 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound -- - Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 ' L T R I L T R ------ -------- Volume -- 10 --- Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 ' Flared Approach: Exists?/Storage / Lanes 1 Configuration R _ ___-Delay, Queue Length, an d Level of Service Approach NB SB West bound __ Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 Lane Config I R v (vph) 10 C(m) (vph) 418 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.07 ' Control Delay 13.8 LOS B Approach Delay 13.8 Approach LOS B 12 TABLE 4-7 ' GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED AREAS* 1 1 1 UNINTERRUPTED FLOW HIGHWAYS FREEWAYS Level of Service Interchange spacing > 2 mi. apart Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 1 Undivided 100 340 670 950 1,300 Lanes A B C D E 2 Divided 1,060 1,720 2,500 3,230 3,670 2 1,270 2,110 2,940 3 580 3 980 3 Divided 1,600 2,590 3,740 4,840 5,500 , , 3 1,970 3,260 4,550 5,530 6,150 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS 4 2,660 4,410 6,150 7 480 8 320 Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) , , 5 3,360 5,560 7,760 9,440 10,480 Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 6 4,050 6,710 9,360 11,390 12,650 E 1 Undivided +• 220 720 860 890 Interchange spacing <2 mi. apart 2 Divided 250 1$30 1,810 1,860 s'+ Level of Service 3 Divided 380 2,330 2,720 2,790 ++• Lanes A B C D E 4 Divided 490 3,030 3,460 3,540 •ss 2 1,130 1,840 2,660 3,440 3,910 Class 11(2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile) 3 1,780 2,890 4,180 5,410 6,150 4 2,340 3,940 5,700 7,380 8,380 Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D 5 3,080 4,990 7,220 9,340 10,620 E 6 3,730 6,040 8,740 11,310 12,850 1 Undivided as 100 590 810 850 2 Divided ss 220 1,360 1,710 1,800 BICYCLE MODE 3 Divided ++ 340 2,110 2,570 2,710 4 Divided • • 440 2,790 3,330 3,500 (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway Class III (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and not geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below within primary city central business district of an by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes ) urbanized area over 750,000) . Paved Shoulder/ Level of Service Level of Service Bicycle Lane Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E I Undivided is ss 280 660 810 0-490/9 ss is 170 720 >720 2 Divided +s s• 650 1,510 1,720 50-84% s• 130 210 >210 sst 3 Divided +• s+ 1,020 2,330 2,580 85-1000/a 160 380 >380 sss sss 4 Divided ++ ss 1,350 3,070 3,330 Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per mile and within PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadwa primary city central business district of an urbanized area y geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not the number of over 750,000) pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below Level of Service by number of directional roadway lanes to determine maximum service volumes.) Lanes Divided A B C D E 1 Undivided •+ •• 270 720 780 Level of Service 2 Divided •• +s 650 1,580 1,660 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 3 Divided si is 1000 2,390 2,490 0490/9 is s0 as 330 810 4 Divided +• s• 1,350 3,130 3,250 50-84% +• t0 is 520 990 85-1000/. s• 120 590 >590 ss+ NON-STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) Level of Service (Buses per hour) Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 1 Undivided •+ +• 480 760 810 Sidewalk Coverage A B C D E 2 Divided is st 1,120 1,620 1,720 0-84% •+ >5 ?4 2!3 >2 3 Divided ss ss 1,740 2,450 2,580 85-1000/0 >6 >4 >3 >2 >1 Other Signalized Roadways ARTERIAL/NON-STATE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS (signalized intersection analysis) DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED Level of Service (alter corresponding volumes by the indicated percent) Lanes Divided A B C D E I Undivided as ss 250 530 660 2 •+ as Lanes Median Left Turns Lanes Adjustment Factors Divided 580 1,140 1,320 1 Divided Yes +5% Source: Florida Department of Transportation 02/22102 1 Undivided No -200/o Systems Planning Office Multi Undivided Yes -5% 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Multi Undivided No -25% Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 http•J/wwwI I.myflorida.com/planning/systems/sm/los/default htm ONE WAY FACILITIES Increase corresponding volume 200/9 'This table does not constitute a standard and should be used only for general planning applications. The computer model. from which this table is derived should be used for more specific planning applications The table and deriving computer models should not be used for corridor or int ti d i h ersec on es gn, w ere more refired techniques exisL Values shown are hourly directional volumes for Icvetsof service and are for the automobile/truck modes unless specifically stated. Level of savior letter grade duesholds are probably not comparable across modes and therefore cross modal com arisons should b d i , , p e ma e w th caution. Furthermore, combining levels of service of different modes into one overall roadway level of service is not recommended To convert to annual avenge daily traffic volumes, these. volumes must be divided by appropriate D and X factors. The table's input value defaults and level of service c it i h r er a appear on t e following page. Calculations are based on planning applications of the Highway Capacity Manual. Bicycle LOS Model, Pedestrian LOS Model and Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, respectively for the auomobile/truck bic cle ed i t d b d - Cannot be, achieved using table input value defaults. , y , p es r an an us mo es. -Not applicable for that level of service loner grade. For auomobilrhruck modes, volumes grater than level of smice D become F because intersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pedestrian modes, the level of service letter grade (including F) is not achievable, because there is ro maximum vehicle volume threshold ruing table input value defaults. 97' FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ORIGINAL D F ?7pT SF? 0 7 2005 PLArvrti,,, :.` ? 6'rCS c?:rx, c.?. FL:t. Drainage Report for Costa Verde at Countryside aka Countryside Executive Golf Course August 2005 Sections 30 A 31,Twp 28 E, Rge 16 E City of Clearwater Pinellas County, Florida prepared for: Beazer Homes Tampa Division prepared by: Florida Design Consultants, Inc New Port Richey, Florida EPN 169 282-02 O G??o??abrera o SOI O,? . 2405 FL A!)?.',No 4'14*?q o ; ? r: Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Contents Preface Existing and Proposed summary Soils Map Existing Conditions Basins Existing Conditions ICPR Input 25Yr 24Hr Existing Node Peak Discharge Summary 25Yr 24Hr Existing Link Peak Discharge Summary Proposed Conditions Basins Proposed Ponds Proposed Conditions ICPR Input 25Yr 24Hr Proposed Node Peak Discharge Summary 25Yr 24Hr Proposed Node Max Summary 25Yr 24Hr Proposed Link Max Summary 100Yr 24Hr Proposed Node Max Summary Stormtab Sleeve 1: Existing and Proposed ICPR Schematic Sleeve 2: Existing Conditions Map Sleeve 3: Proposed Conditions Map DrainageReportCover,Contents CEGC.xIs Contents I COSTA VERDE AT COUNTRYSIDE PREFACE OVERVIEW This preface to the Drainage Report for Costa Verde at Countryside is to briefly describe the project, the existing drainage conditions and the proposed design system that will limit the impact of the development on the surrounding properties. Environmental elements, while a part of the drainage design considerations, are specifically addressed in the Environmental Resource Permit section narrative prepared for the regional, state and federal permit programs. The drainage report will also be submitted to the appropriate local municipal and county departments for their review and approval. Copies of the Environmental Resource Permit Narrative will be provided where required. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is an existing 44.28-acre executive golf course constructed, as was most of the surrounding development, in the 1970's. The property is an irregular shape and has approximately three miles of boundary line. Drainage from the site is generally to the east and west. Located in the upper reaches of the Curlew Creek Basin watershed, the site is on a ridgeline with runoff to the west ultimately going to Channel B of the Curlew Creek Basin. Runoff to the east goes into Channel A of Curlew Creek. Both channels run in manmade ditches and/or piped systems for some distance to the north before eventually connecting to Curlew Creek. There are five isolated wetlands on-site, two more wetlands that straddle the property line and two ponds. All of the wetlands are impacted by the golf course and the existing surrounding developments. None of the wetlands appear to operate in the range of their historic hydro-period. The proposed drainage ponds will incorporate the on-site wetlands into the surface water management system. The surface water system is designed to include the wetlands. This should assist in keeping the wetlands viable systems. ' CAUTION: The project vertical datum is NAVD 1988. The record information utilized in investigating the existing drainage conditions was based on NGVD 1929 vertical datum. To convert NGVD 1929 elevations to NAVD 1988 subtract 0.86 from the NGVD 1929 elevations. Elevations used in the ICPR model and given on the plans are based on NAVD 1988 datum. CHANNEL A The east half of the project drains to Channel A, an upland cut ditch that runs along the northwest side of Countryside Boulevard (designated Wetland D for this project). The ditch turns northerly and runs through the golf course through existing double 60" CMP culverts and under a cart path bridge to then parallel the west right-of-way of Enterprise Road. This part of the Channel A ditch is designated Wetland C. The ditch leaves the project through 3 48" RCPs under Enterprise Road, then in a short open section, 160 feet plus or minus, and then into an elliptical pipe culvert. The Channel A ditch is then converted for approximately a quarter of a mile to the north side of SR 580 (Main Street). On the north side of SR 580, the ditch flow is conveyed in a recently constructed 5' by 10' box culvert for a half mile. The ditch continues northerly eventually discharging to St Joseph Sound and the Gulf of Mexico some five miles total. The ditch receives flows at several points from south of Countryside Boulevard and from Enterprise Road. The main discharge to the ditch is from the pond (designated existing conditions pond 1) located in the south part of the golf course, the pond (designated existing conditions pond 2) centrally located in the golf course and from the clubhouse, Dogwater's Restaurant and the adjacent parking. No piped discharge from Pond 1 has been discovered. Discharge to the Channel A ditch appears to be over the edges of the wetlands adjacent to Pond 1. The existing conditions ICPR model accounts for attenuation provided by the isolated wetlands. There is an existing CMP pipe from Pond 2 that may have discharged to the Channel A ditch but no outfall for this pipe has been found. Or Wetland CYA east of Pond 2 may have been connected to Pond 2 by this CMP culvert but no connection has been found. It appears that Pond 2 actually discharges to the northeast overland to the parking lot of the commercial development to the north of Pond 2. The existing conditions ICPR model routes the existing discharge by this overland flow where the runoff then goes into the Channel A ditch system. Adjacent to the northerly east property line is a commercial area. Runoff from the rear of this area flows south along the property line turning east across the paved area north of Pond 2 and then to the Channel A ditch. CHANNEL B LAKEWOOD DRIVE OUTFALL The west side of the golf course boarders several multi-family projects that were constructed at the same general time as the golf course. Runoff from the rear of these developments flows along the golf course property lines joining with runoff from the golf course to several locations along Laurelwood Drive within the Village on the Green development. The runoff enters the collection system for Laurelwood Drive and discharges to a lake in the center of the Village on the Green project. Discharge from the lake is through an outfall control structure located at the northwest of the lake. From this outfall structure flow is to the collection system in Belcher Road. To the west of the basin ridge line the upper Channel B watershed receives runoff from Village on the Green and adjacent multi-family projects and a portion of the golf course. Runoff from the Belcher Road right-of-way is collected and piped to a junction with the Village on the Green system. This flow is then combined with runoff from the north: mainly from St. Michaels Archangel Catholic Church (St Michaels) complex and the west part of the golf course. All these flows are piped in the Lakewood Drive outfall to the west. Additional runoff from single family subdivisions on each side of Lakewood Drive goes into the Lakewood Drive outfall. The Lakewood Drive outfall flows to a sump. A weir controls discharge from the sump. Flows over this weir are directly to Channel B of Curlew Creek. In our preliminary study of the existing drainage conditions several issues were identified that affected our ' design approach. We determined that some of the offsite runoff in the existing conditions was piped to the golf course from the north from the St Michaels detention pond. This discharge came onto the course and followed a route west near the north boundary of the golf course and then to the south to an existing 15" RCP located at the southwest corner of the golf course adjacent to the Belcher Road right-of way. Also, an existing wetland straddles the common boundary between the golf course and Village on the Green ' with about equal areas on each side. This wetland discharges overflow to the existing 15" RCP located at the southwest corner of the golf course. FDC contacted Pinellas County Engineering and was faxed a portion of the Belcher Road drainage plans for ' this area. These plans were prepared, and Belcher Road constructed, in the late 1970's. The faxed material, while difficult to read, indicated the construction of 500 feet of 15" RCP to take the runoff from ' approximately 14 acres most of which was partially developed at this time. Continuing our research, FDC obtained information from the Southwest Florida Water Management files of record for the St Michaels church site. The church site was constructed in several phases over a number of ' years. Note that Belcher Road and the golf course were constructed prior to Southwest Florida Water Management District's present permitting program. The initial permit granted St Michaels indicated a ' portion of the project site was to drain to the north to the FDOT right-of-way of Main Street (SR 584). Subsequent permits showed that the St Michaels site all went to detention pond at the west side of the St ' Michaels site. The initial size of the detention pond was enlarged with one of these later additions. ' FDC personnel met with City of Clearwater Engineering Department personnel who also provided copies of some of the material that we obtained from the Southwest Florida Water Management District files. At the meeting with Clearwater we discussed the situation of discharge from the golf course site over the back of the sidewalk and onto the Belcher Road right-of-way. The City personnel indicated that while this was not usually a preferred drainage design there rules permitted this type of discharge as the only discharge as long as the 50-year return frequency storm was not exceeded. We indicated that we were still investigating final design options but didn't want to approach Pinellas County without coordinating with the City. The Pinellas County Drainage Maintenance Department was contacted and copies of limited information from the County's Belcher Road Plans which were 24 by 36 blueline copies of the plans and not reduced copies were obtained. Unfortunately the plan sheets for the portion of Belcher Road adjacent to project site and those plan profile sheets showing the 15" RCP were missing from the plan sets. However, the Lakewood Road outfall plans were in the set. As part of FDC's evaluation of the drainage to Belcher Road, FDC's survey crews obtained field data for the outfall from the Village on the Green lake to Belcher Road and the structures in the Belcher Road right- of-way including data on the 15" RCP. This information combined with the data obtained from the Southwest Florida Water Management District, the City of Clearwater, including the City's Atlas sheets, and Pinellas County provided the information for FDC to develop an ICPR model of the existing conditions for this area. To reiterate, one feature that is important for using the ICPR model and the results: the project datum is NAVD 1988. The information for the adjacent area utilized NGVD 1929 Datum. It is important to keep this in mind when comparing the results of the model with other plans or data sources. Our approach was to evaluate replacing the existing 15" RCP with an 18" or a 24" pipe from the southwest corner of the project. The existing conditions model was enlarged to include the entire Lakewood Drive outfall system including the weir at the sump at the lower end of the outfall. The 15" RCP from the southwest corner of the site was included in this model. The golf course site contained a wetland that attenuated some of the existing runoff as did the "shared" wetland along the south site boundary. The golf course wetland discharged over an existing cart path above an existing 12" PVC pipe. This flow combined with the discharge from the St Michael detention pond. Discharge from these combined flows was to the 15" RCP at the southwest corner. The outcome of the modeling of the existing conditions revealed that there were three points of discharge from the St Michael and golf course systems: the 15" RCP carried only a portion of the 25 year 24 hour (Type 2 Florida Modified) runoff from a 9" rainfall. The tailwater condition resulting from the 15" RCP caused flow over the back of sidewalk into Belcher Road in two places. One was on the south side of the south entrance to St Michael and the other an overflow north of this entrance. The back of sidewalk overflow north of the St Michael south entrance was a result of the size of its weir and outfall system and the tailwater created by the 15" RCP. The flow over the back of the sidewalk south of the St Michaels south entrance was a result of the tailwater in the 15" RCP and the additional flow from the St Michaels detention pond combined with the discharge from the golf course. This is presented as existing information in Table 1. The proposed conditions runs included the proposed pond (Pond 3), the existing wetland straddling the south site boundary, wetland CYF, and the existing St Michael detention pond. Three runs were made using first the existing 15" RCP, then an18" RCP replacing the entire 500 feet of existing 15" RCP and, finally, 500 feet of 19" by 30" ERCP. In all cases there continued to be discharge over the back of sidewalk both north and south of the St Michael south entrance as well as to the southwest through the pipe system. No matter what size pipe was modeled in the post condition, there was overflow over the back of the sidewalk from both systems although at a reduced peak discharge rate in all three cases. Based on the above our proposal is to leave the existing 15" RCP offsite and restrict the post developed discharge to no more than the existing peak discharges. DESIGN CRITERIA Water quality will be provided by biological uptake of nutrients with bleed down orifices in the outfall control structures. Each pond, whether it has an outfall control structure or not, will have a littoral area of 35% of the area at NWL no deeper than 2 foot below normal water level located at the outfall from the pond per City of Clearwater requirements. Discharge from the site will be restricted to no more than the existing peak discharge rate based on a 9 inch rainfall in 24 hours (25 year, type II Florida Modified rainfall). Peak factor is 256 and CN's are based on AMC II. In the existing condition the golf course is assumed to have frequent irrigation and this will cause a condition more like AMC III. Times on concentration flow paths are indicated on the existing conditions drainage maps. Calculations of the existing TOC's are shown in the Hydrologic Terrain worksheets for each basin. Proposed conditions TOC's are based on stormtab time estimates. Several meetings were held with the adjacent home-owner's groups along the west side of the project. Each project area selected the type of perimeter treatment they wanted adjacent to their existing project: berm with meandered chainlink fence or wall. The construction plans Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan sheets indicate a specific drainage design for each type of perimeter feature. Where walls are to be constructed, scuppers are to be placed to prevent the ponding of water against the wall. Historical drainage paths will not be blocked. In no instance is a greater amount of drainage area allowed to flow to the adjacent existing developments. Along the perimeter of the site on the west side existing flumes are to remain. Where a chance for ponding might occur, yard drains are to be installed to provide positive drainage. The storm water collection system was designed using Manning's for a 10 yr Q based the Rational Formula and a minimum TOC of 10 minutes. PROPOSED TO CHANNEL A DITCH The construction of Pond 100 will incorporate Pond 1 and the adjacent wetlands. Discharge for this system is to the Channel A ditch and is controlled by an Outfall Control structure with a skimmer. Pond 105 and 110 also discharge to the Channel A ditch with an Outfall Control structure and skimmer from Pond 105. Pond 120 and the adjacent wetlands discharges to the Channel A ditch through an Outfall Control structure with a skimmer. Two yard drain by-pass systems discharge to the channel A ditch. One yard drain system connects to the outfall control structure and the other crosses Enterprise Road. TO VILLAGE ON THE GREEN LAKE The existing drainage systems that discharge to Laurelwood Drive will be maintained. The area from the proposed project to these systems will be reduced. No paved surfaces will be connected to these outfalls. Run off from the rear of the proposed townhomes will be directed to the project stormwater management system. The existing Swale along the east property line of the Laurelwood Condominium will be augmented with yard drainages. The existing drainage pattern along the Village on the Green Condominium III, Phases 9 and 10 will remain. The wall requested by the homeowners will have scuppers to allow water through the wall to continue to drain to Laurelwood Drive. The small existing wetland MH will remain a low spot. No provisions to drain this wetland are proposed. The drainage system along the east line of the Village on the Green Condominium III, Phases 4, 5 and 7 will have yard drain constructed along the property line. This yard drain will discharge as previously discussed to the outfall control structure for pond 120. The existing swale and 12" pipe runoff system along the northeast boundary line of Village on the Green Condominium III, Phases 1 and 2 will remain. This system drains to the paved flume section that discharges to Laurelwood Drive and the Village on the Green collection system. To the north of this the existing concrete flume that runs along the rear lot lines of the Village on the Greens patio homes, will remain in place. Runoff from the proposed project will be restricted to that area that is west of the proposed berm that was requested by these homeowners. :pcm K:\Costa Verde at Countryside\ReportsTreface.doc Costa Verde at Countryside 25 Year 24 Hour FLMOD 9" Rainfall CHANNEL A C1 C2 C3 Commercial Total CHANNEL B St Michael's Pond north of Church entrance overflow to Belcher Overflow to Belcher Rd south of Church entrance from existing golf course swale VOG lake Existing Existing Proposed Proposed El Peak El Peak cfs cfs N/A 12.38 N/A 36.67 N/A 11.93 N/A 5.29 N/A 32.09 N/A 23.63 N/A 42.95 N/A 4.98 99.35 70.57 71.90 18.58 71.90 18.63 70.37 29.59 70.31 20.39 66.84 38.73 66.63 37.07 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SUMMARY Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL DrainageReportCover,Contents CEGC.xls Summary 2:12 PM 8/2412005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 1 St Michael Archangel Area: On-site = 3.860 Off-site = 0.650 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 B/D, D Maintenance bldg 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D Open space good 0.650 B/D, D Open Spaces: Golf Courses 3.860 B/D Wetlands 0.000 B/D, D Water 0.000 --- Total 4.510 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 6.0 100 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L 1360 Channelized Flow: L 0 T (minutes) = 35.4 Use-T (minutes) = 35.4 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 4.510 CN 95 98 79 80 89 95 100 CN = 87.7 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(sub 1)' 0.2 10.07 0.037 5.99 s V t(sub2)2 0.00228 0.8 29.42 v t(sub3) 2 0.0 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 1 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 2 Area: On-site = 2.820 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 B/D, D Maintenance bldg 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 C Open Spaces: Golf Courses 2.350 B/D, D Wetlands 0.470 B/D, D Water 0.000 --- Total 2.820 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 8.6 135 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L 370 Channelized Flow: L 0 T (minutes) = 13.1 Use-T (minutes) = 13.1 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrologyfor Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 2.820 CN 95 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 90.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(sub 1) 0.2 8.93 0.0237 8.60 s V t(sub2)2 0.0073 1.4 4.47 v t(sub3) 2 0.0 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 2 8/23/200510:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 3 Area: On-site = 1.080 Off-site = 0.950 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.850 B/D, D Maintenance bldg 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 C Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.980 B/D Wetlands 0.200 B/D, D Water 0.000 --- Total 2.030 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 4.4 78 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L 0 Channelized Flow: L 555 T (minutes) = 9.1 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 2.030 CN 92 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 90.8 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(sub l) 0.2 11.09 0.0539 4.44 S V t(sub2)z 0.00103 0.5 0.00 v t(sub3) 2 4.6 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL' ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 3 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 4 Area: On-site = 0.480 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG Commercial (85% Impervious) 0.000 B/D, D Maintenance bldg 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 C Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.480 B/D Wetlands 0.000 B/D, D Water 0.000 --- Total 0.480 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 11.5 130 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: Channelized Flow: A (acres) = 0.480 CN 95 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 89.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(sub 1) 0.4 8.04 0.0385 11.49 s V t(sub2)z 0.00103 0.5 0.00 v t(sub3) 2 0.0 L 0 L 0 T (minutes) = 11.5 Use-T (minutes) = 11.5 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 4 8/23/200510:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 5 Area: On-site = 1.580 Off-site = 0.530 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Commercial (85% Impervious) 0.530 Maintenance bldg 0.020 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 1.560 Wetlands 0.000 Water 0.000 Total 2.110 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D A (acres) = 2.110 CN 95 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 90.6 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t(sub 1) 10.8 80 0.4 8.23 0.0175 10.78 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s V t(sub2)2 570 0.0007 0.4 22.25 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 0 2 0.0 T (minutes) = 33.0 Use-T (minutes) = 33.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 5 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 6 Area: On-site = 11.950 Off-site = 0.850 A (acres) = 12.800 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG CN Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.850 B/D, D 92 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 B/D, D 98 Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D 79 Wooded (average) 0.000 C 74 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 11.280 B/D, D 89 Wetlands 0.300 B/D, D 95 Water (Pond 2) 0.370 --- 100 Total 12.800 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. CN = 89.7 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t(sub 1)` From North 8.7 60 0.4 8.89 0.0183 8.68 From South 10.1 90 0.4 8.89 0.02667 9.88 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s V t(sub2)2 From North 1240 0.0026 0.8 25.12 From South 895 0.00201 0.7 20.62 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 0 2 0.0 T (minutes) = 33.8 Use-T (from North) (minutes) = 33.8 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 6 8/23/200510:47 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 7 Included in VOG Area: On-site = 2.270 Off-site = 1.700 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 1.700 B/D, D Maintenance bldg 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 C Open Spaces: Golf Courses 2.270 B/D, D Wetlands 0.000 B/D, D Water 0.000 --- Total 3.970 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 8.2 85 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L 0 Channelized Flow: L 1070 T (minutes) = 17.1 Use-T (minutes) = 17.1 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 3.970 CN 95 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 91.6 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(sub 1) ` 0.4 9.08 0.0435 8.18 S V t(sub2)2 0.00228 0.8 0.00 v t(sub3) 2 8.9 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 7 8/23/200510:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 9 Area: On-site = 3.210 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.920 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 2.030 Wetlands 0.000 Water (in Ditch) 0.260 Total 3.210 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 13.0 210 0.2 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 290 0.0128 Channelized Flow: L v 575 2 T (minutes) = 20.5 Use-T (minutes) = 20.5 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 3.210 HSG CN C B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D 90 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 92.5 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)` 7.67 0.0176 13.03 V t(sub2)2 1.8 2.65 t(sub3) 4.8 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 9 8/23/2005 10:24 AM f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 10 Area: On-site = 3.630 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.280 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 3.080 Wetlands 0.000 Water (in Ditch) 0.270 Total 3.630 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 27.3 220 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 0 1.5 A (acres) = 3.630 HSG CN C 90 B/D, D 98 B/D, D 79 C 74 B/D, D 89 B/D, D 95 --- 100 CN = 90.5 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1) 5.60 0.01 27.29 V t(sub2)z 2.3 0.00 t(sub3) 0.0 T (minutes) = 27.3 Use-T (minutes) = 27.3 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-l, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 10 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 11 Area: On-site = 3.240 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.330 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 2.550 Wetlands 0.000 Water (in Ditch) 0.360 Total 3.240 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 20.2 220 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 0 1.5 A (acres) = 3.240 HSG CN C 90 B/D, D 98 B/D, D 79 C 74 B/D, D 89 B/D, D 95 --- 100 CN = 91.1 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 6.41 0.0227 20.21 V t(sub2)2 2.3 0.00 t(sub3 ) 0.0 T (minutes) = 20.2 Use-T (minutes) = 20.2 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 11 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 12 Area: On-site = 0.800 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.550 Wetlands 0.250 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 0.800 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 6.8 70 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 80 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 0 1.5 A (acres) = 0.800 HSG CN C 90 B/D, D 98 B/D, D 79 C 74 B/D, D 89 B/D, D 95 --- 100 CN = 90.9 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)` 9.67 0.05 6.81 V t(sub2)2 2.3 0.57 t(sub3) 0.0 T (minutes) = 7.4 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 12 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 13 Area: On-site = 4.350 Off-site = 0.000 A (acres) = 4.350 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses (Good) 3.680 Wetlands 0.260 Water (@ NWL) 0.410 Total 4.350 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG C B/D, D B/D, D C B/D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 8.6 150 0.2 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 430 0.005 Channelized Flow: L v 0 1.5 T (minutes) = 14.9 Use-T (minutes) = 14.9 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 90 98 79 74 89 100 100 CN = 90.7 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 8.93 0.029 8.62 V t(sub2)Z 1.1 6.28 t(sub3) 0.0 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 13 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 14 Included in VOG Area: On-site = 2.150 Off-site = 0.700 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.700 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 2.150 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 2.850 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG C B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D A (acres) = 2.850 CN 90 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 89.2 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t(sub 1) 52.4 300 0.4 4.01 0.0033 52.36 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s V t(sub2)2 220 0.0095 1.6 2.33 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 400 2.5 2.7 T (minutes) = 57.4 Use-T (minutes) = 20.0 This subbasin is 2% of site: Use 20 minutes as representative of the remaining 98% of the basin to VOG Lake 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 14 8/23/2005 4:31 PM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 15 Included in VOG Area: On-site = 2.350 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 1.610 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 1.610 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 11.9 100 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 705 1.5 T (minutes) = 19.7 Use-T (minutes) = 19.7 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 2.350 HSG CN C B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D 90 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 89.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 7.93 0.0208 11.87 V t(sub2)2 1.2 0.00 t(sub3) 7.8 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 15 8/23/200510:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 16 Included in VOG Area: On-site = 0.510 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.480 Wetlands 0.030 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 0.510 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 8.2 110 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 0 1.5 T (minutes) = 8.2 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 0.510 - HSG C B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN 90 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 89.4 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 9.08 0.0727 8.18 V t(sub2)z 1.2 0.00 t(sub3) 0.0 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 16 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin St Michael Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site = 9.150 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Commercial (Church) 2.180 Paved Parking 2.980 Grassed Parking 3.420 Wooded (average) Pond banks 0.320 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water 0.250 Total 9.150 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 13.7 180 0.1 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.0073 Channelized, Flow: L v 1160 2 T (minutes) = 23.4 Use-T (minutes) = 23.4 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 9.150 HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D CN 95 98 85 80 89 95 100 CN = 91.9 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)` 7.52 0.0028 13.71 V t(sub2)2 1.4 0.00 t(sub3) 9.7 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls StM'I 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin BRl Belcher Road Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site ='0.500 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 0.500 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 0.500 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 11.9 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 100 2 A (acres) = 0.500 HSG CN B/D, D 92 B/D, D 90.2 B/D, D 79 C 74 B/D, D 89 B/D, D 95 --- 100 CN = 90.2 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)` 7.93 0.0208 0.00 V t(sub2)2 1.2 0.00 t(sub3 ) 0.8 T (minutes) = 0.8 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls BR1 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin BR2 Belcher Road Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site = 3.640 A (acres) = 3.640 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.640 Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 3.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 3.640 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 11.9 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 1165 2 T (minutes) = 9.7 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 92 90.2 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 90.5 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1) 7.93 0.0208 0.00 V t(sub2)Z 1.2 0.00 t(sub3 ) 9.7 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls BR2 8/23/200510:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin BR3 Belcher Road Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site = 8.940 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 2.400 Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 6.540 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 8.940 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 11.9 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 2850 2 T (minutes) = 23.8 Use-T (minutes) = 23.8 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 8.940 HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN 92 90.2 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 90.7 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 7.93 0.0208 0.00 V t(sub2)2 1.2 0.00 t(sub3) 23.8 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls BR3 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin BR4 Belcher Road Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site = 0.840 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 0.840 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 0.840 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 11.9 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 730 2 T (minutes) = 6.1 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 0.840 HSG CN C B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D 90 90.2 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 90.2 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)' 7.93 0.0208 0.00 V t(sub2)2 1.2 0.00 t(sub3) 6.1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls BR4 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin VOG (Village on the Green) Area: On-site = 7.280 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 72.490 Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 7.280 Wetlands 3.910 Water (@ El 64) 7.750 Total 91.430 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 44.6 300 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 200 0.0105 B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN 92 90.2 79 74 89 95 100 A (acres) = 91.430 CN = 92.6 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 4.38 0.005 44.63 V t(sub2)2 1.7 2.02 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 400 2 3.3 T (minutes) = 50.0 Use-T (minutes) = 50.0 Overland and Shallow Concentrated from Golf Course (On-site) for a 2 acre basin 2% of site. Not indicative of the built up character of Village on the Green: Use estimated stormtab minutes. Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 20.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls VOG 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Off-site = 84.150 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 68 Lakewood Dr Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site = 1.600 A (acres) = 1.600 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 1.600 Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 1.600 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 12.0 100 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 400 2 T (minutes) = 15.4 Use-T (minutes) = 15.4 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 92 90.2 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 92.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)` 7.91 0.02 12.03 V t(sub2)z 1.2 0.00 t(sub3) 3.3 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 68 8/23/200510:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 70 Lakewood Dr Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site = 30.700 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 30.700 B/D, D Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D Wooded (average) 0.000 C Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 B/D, D Wetlands 0.000 B/D, D Water (@ NWL) 0.000 --- Total 30.700 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 12.0 100 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L 0 Channelized Flow: L 1800 T (minutes) = 27.0 Use-T (minutes) = 27.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 30.700 CN 92 90.2 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 92.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(subl)l 0.4 7.91 0.02 12.03 s V t(sub2)z 0.00517 1.2 0.00 v t(sub3) 2 15.0 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 70 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 73 Lakewood Dr Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site = 0.200 A (acres) = 0.200 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 20.700 Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 20.700 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 12.0 100 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 50 2 T (minutes) = 12.4 Use-T (minutes) = 12.4 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 92 90.2 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 92.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 7.91 0.02 12.03 V t(sub2)2 1.2 0.00 t(sub3) 0.4 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 73 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Existing Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 76 Lakewood Dr Area: On-site = 0.000 Off-site = 20.700 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 20.700 Road R/W (Belcher Rd) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open Spaces: Golf Courses 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 20.700 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 12.0 100 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.00517 Channelized Flow: L v 1900 2 A (acres) = 20.700 HSG CN B/D, D 92 B/D, D 90.2 B/D, D 79 C 74 B/D, D 89 B/D, D 95 --- 100 CN = 92.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)` 7.91 0.02 12.03 V t(sub2)z 1.2 0.00 t(sub3) 15.8 T (minutes) = 27.9 Use-T (minutes) = 27.9 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL ExistCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 76 8/23/2005 10:24 AM Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am ---------------------------------------------------------- Basins Name: 1 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 . Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 4.510 Curve Number: 87.70 DCIA(%): 0.00 Name: 10 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 3.630 Curve Number: 90.50 DCIA M : 0.00 ---------------------------------- Name: 11 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 3.240 Curve Number: 91.10 DCIA M : 0.00 ------------------------------ Name: 12 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 0.800 Curve Number: 90.90 DCIA M : 0.00 ----------------------------------- Name: 13 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 4.350 Curve Number: 90.70 DCIA(%): 0.00 Node: 1E(SpreadSwale) Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 35.40 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 -------------------------------------------- Node: C2(CHANNEL A) Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 27.30 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------------------------------- Node: C3(CHANNEL A) Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 20.20 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------------------------------- Node: WETLAND-CYC Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------------------------------------------ Node: Pond 1/CYB Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 14.90 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 -------------------------------------------------- Name: 14 Node: VOG ---------------------------------- Status: Inactive Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL I Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 ' Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 38.20 Area(ac): 2.850 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 89.20 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: 15 ----------- ---------- Node: --------------------- VOG ---------- Status: ------------------------ Inactive ' Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 19.70 Area(ac): 2.350 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 89.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: 16 ----------- --------- Node: --------------------- VOG ---------- Status: ------------------------ Inactive Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.510 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 89.40 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 --------------- - ----- Name: 2 - -- ----------- ---------- Node: g -----------Y--YE) ---P-- 2E(WetlandC Status: ---------- Onsite ------------------------ Group: B A SE Type: SCS Unit H dro ra h Hydrograph: Unit Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 13.10 Area(ac): 2.820 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(°%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: 3 ----------- ---------- Node: --------------------- 3E(WetlandCYF) ---------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 2.030 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.80 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: 4 ----------- ------------------------------- Node: Commercial ---------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 11.50 Area(ac): 0.480 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am Curve Number: 89.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: 5 ----------- ------------------------------ Node: Commercial ----------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 33.00 Area(ac): 2.110 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.60 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------- Name: 6 ---------- ------------------------------ Node: Pond 2/CYA/CYD ----------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 33.80 Area(ac): 12.800 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 89.70 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------- Name: 68 ----------- ----------------------------- Node: 68 ----------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 15.40 Area(ac): 1.600 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------- Name: 7 ----------- ----------------------------- Node: VOG ------------ Status: ----------------------- Inactive Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 17.10 Area(ac): 3.970 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 91.60 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------- Name: 70 ------- --------------------------------- Node: 70 ----------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 27.00 Area(ac): 30.700 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): ------------------------ 0.00 -------- --------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am Name: 73 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 0.200 Curve Number: 92.00 DCIA(%): 0.00 Node: 73 Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 12.40 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------ Name: 76 ----------- ------------------------------ Node: 76 ----------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 27.90 Area(ac): 20.700 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: 9 ----------- ------------------------------- Node: C1(CHANNEL A) ---------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 20.50 Area(ac): 3.210 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.50 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 ------------------------ Name: BR1 ----------- ------------------------------- Node: BR1 ---------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.500 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.20 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 -------------- ----------- Name: BR2 ---------- ------------------------------- Node: LD3 ---------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite • Group BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 3.640 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.50 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: BR3 Node: BR1 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 23.80 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL r Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 4 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am Area(ac): 8.940 Curve Number: 90.70 DCIA(%): 0.00 -------------------- Name: BR4 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Rainfall File: Rainfall Amount(in): Area(ac): Curve Number: DCIA(%): Uh256 Flmod 9.000 0.840 90.20 0.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ----------------------------------------------------- Node: BR2 Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------- Name: StM'1 ----------- --------- Node: --------------------- St Michael ---------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 23.40 Area(ac): 9.150 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 91.90 M ax Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 Estimated TOC: 180' overland grassed parking, 1160' ditch/piped @ 2'/sec ------------------------- Name: VOG ----------- --------- Node: --------------------- VOG ---------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 20.00 Area(ac): 91.430 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.60 M ax Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 ---------------------- Nodes ---------- ----- ------ ----------- Name: 1E(SpreadSwale) Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 68.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 70.700 Type: Stage/Area Swale along golf course west boundary Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- ------------ - - - 68.000 0.0100 69.000 0.1600 70.500 1.0500 ---------------------------------------------------------- Name: 2E(WetlandCYE) Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ---------- Init ---------- Stage(ft): ------------ 70.300 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 73.000 Type: Stage/Area Includes wetland CYE Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 70.300 0.4680 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL I Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 5 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am 71.500 0.6660 ------------------------------------------------------- Name: 3E(WetlandCYF) Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Group: BASE Type: Stage/Area Includes wetland CYF Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 70.000 0.2000 71.000 0.4000 ------------------------------------------------------- Name: 68 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor ----------------------- Init Stage(ft): 70.000 Warn Stage(ft): 73.000 ----------------------- Init Stage(ft): 41.500 Warn Stage(ft): 47.000 Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 41.500 0.0008 46.000 0.0008 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 70 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 45.100 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 51.500 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 45.100 0.0010 51.000 0.0010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 73 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 50.700 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 61.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Stage(ft) Area(ac) ---------- --------------- 50.700 0.0008 60.000 0.0008 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 76 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 56.000 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 63.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Stage(ft) Area(ac) ---------- --------------- 56.000 0.0008 63.000 0.0008 -------------------------- Name: BELCHER Group: BASE Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 67.700 Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 6 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am 0.00 67.700 12.00 69.000 13.00 69.500 24.00 68.000 40.00 68.000 ------------------------------- Name: BR1 ----------------- Base Flow(cfs): ---------- 0.000 ---------- Init ---------- Stage(ft): ------------ 59.700 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Manhole west of Belcher, 130' south of Lakewood Dr Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 59.700 0.0010 69.000 0.0010 ------------------------------- Name: BR2 ----------------- Base Flow(cfs): ---------- 0.000 ---------- Init ---------- Stage(ft): ------------ 59.800 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Manhole east side of Belcher Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 59.800 0.0010 69.000 0.0010 ------------------------------- Name: Cl(CHANNEL A) ----------------- Base Flow(cfs): ---------- 0.000 ---------- Init ---------- Stage(ft): ------------ 66.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Type: Time/Stage Boundary Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 66.000 12.00 69.500 16.00 70.000 40.00 66.000 100.00 66.000 ------------------------------- Name: C2(CHANNEL A) ----------------- Base Flow(cfs): ---------- 0.000 ---------- Init ---------- Stage(ft): ------------ 68.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 Type: Time/Stage Boundary Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 68.000 12.00 70.000 16.00 70.500 40.00 68.000 100.00 68.000 ------------------------------- Name: C3(CHANNEL A) ----------------- Base Flow(cfs): ---------- 0.000 ---------- Init ---------- Stage(ft): ------------ 68.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Type: Time/Stage Boundary Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 68.000 12.00 70.500 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 7 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am 16.00 71.000 40.00 68.000 100.00 68.000 ----------------------------------------------- Name: Channel B Base Flow(cfs): ------------ 0.000 -------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ------------ 45.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 47.000 Type: Time/Stage Channel B of Curlew Creek west of existing sump at the west end of Lakewood Dr Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 45.000 12.50 45.000 14.00 45.000 24.00 45.000 40.00 45.000 ----------------------------------------------- Name: Commercial Base Flow(cfs): ------------- 0.000 -------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 70.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Type: Time/Stage Parking lot south end of commercial area: goes to Channel A overland to inlets Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 70.000 100.00 70.000 ----------------------------------------------- Name: LD3 Base Flow(cfs): ------------- 0.000 -------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 59.600 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Manhole west of Belcher @ Lakewood Dr Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 59.600 0.0010 69.000 0.0010 ----------------------------------------------- Name: LDSump Base Flow(cfs): ------------- 0.000 -------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 35.500 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 47.000 Type: Stage/Area Sump at west end of Lakewood Drive outfall pipe Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 35.500 0.0550 47.000 0.1450 ----------------------------------------------- Name: Pond 1/CYB Base Flow(cfs): ------------- 0.000 -------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 71.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 73.000 Type: Stage/Area Pond 1 includes Wetland CYB Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 71.500 0.6700 71.700 0.7800 71.900 0.8900 72.100 0.9900 72.300 1.1000 72.500 1.2100 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 8 of 17 ' Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am ---------------------------------------------------------- Name: Pond 2/CYA/CYD Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 --------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ------------ 69.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Type: Stage/Area Pond 2 includes wetlands CYA and CYD Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 68.000 0.3000 70.000 0.5400 71.000 1.1700 71.500 1.6000 ---------------------------------------------------------- Name: St Michael Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ---------- Init ---------- Stage(ft): ------------ 70.200 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 71.200 Type: Stage/Area These stages are 1988 Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 69.140 0.2500 70.140 0.3200 71.140 0.4000 ------------------------------- - -- -------------------------------------------------------- Name: VOG Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 61.300 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 Type: Stage/Area Village on the Green lake Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 60.000 4.6000 64.100 7.7500 69.100 11.6600 -------------------------------------------------------------- Name: WETLAND-CYC Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ----- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ------------ 71.300 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 73.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 71.300 0.2500 71.400 0.2700 71.600 0.3000 71.800 0.3300 72.000 0.3600 ,72.200 0.3900 Cross Sections ---- ----------- ------------ Name: Group: BASE Encroachment: No Station(ft) Elevation(ft) Manning's N ----------- --------------- --------------- Pipes Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 9 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am Name: 1E>BR2 Group: BASE From Node: 1E(SpreadSwale) Length(ft): 550.00 To Node: BR2 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM ' Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 15.00 15.00 Rise(in): 15.00 15.00 Invert(ft): 67.790 61.960 ' Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Friction Equation: Solution Algorithm: Flow: Entrance Loss Coef: Exit Loss Coef: Bend Loss Coef: Outlet Ctrl Spec: Inlet Ctrl Spec: Stabilizer Option: Average Conveyance Automatic Both 0.50 0.50 0.00 Use do or tw Use do None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Existing 15" RCP: "Offsite" drainage for Belcher Rd. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 1E>BR2(19x30) From Node: 1E(SpreadSwale) Length(ft): 500.00 Group: BASE To Node: BR2 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Horz Ellipse Horz Ellipse Span(in): 30.00 30.00 Rise(in): 19.00 19.00 Invert(ft): 67.790 61.800 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 ' Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 ' Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall ' Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall Friction Equation: Solution Algorithm: Flow: Entrance Loss Coef: Exit Loss Coef: Bend Loss Coef: Outlet Ctrl Spec: Inlet Ctrl Spec: Stabilizer Option: Average Conveyance Automatic None 0.00 0.00 0.00 Use do or tw Use do None Name: 2E>lE From Node: 2E(WetlandCYE) Len th(ft): 30.50 - Group: BASE To Node: lE(SpreadSwale) Count: l Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both ' Span(in): 12.00 12.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 12.00 12.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 69.800 69.900 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do t Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 68>LDSump From Node: 68 Length(ft): 370.00 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 10 of 17 ' Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span(in): 60.00 Rise(in): 60.00 Invert(ft): 41.500 Manning's N: 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 To Node: LDSump DOWNSTREAM Circular 60.00 60.00 40.500 0.013000 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Lakewood Dr outfall Name: 70>68 Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span(in): 60.00 Rise(in): 60.00 Invert(ft): 45.100 Manning's N: 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 ------------- From Node: 70 To Node: 68 DOWNSTREAM Circular 60.00 60.00 44.000 0.013000 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Lakewood Dr outfall Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None ------------------ Length(ft): 375.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None -------------- Name: ------------ 73>70 -------------------------- From Node: 73 ----------------------- Length(ft): ------------------------ 175.00 Group: BASE To Node: 70 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 48.00 48.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 48.00 48.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 50.700 50.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Lakewood Dr outfall ---------------------------------------------------- Name: 76>73 From Node: 76 Group: BASE To Node: 73 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL ------------------------------------------ Length(ft): 225.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page I 1 of 17 ' Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 48.00 48.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 48.00 48.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 56.000 55.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Lakewood Dr outfall ------------- Name: ------------- BR1>LD3 -------------------------- From Node: BR1 ----------------------- Length(ft): ------------------- 150.00 Group: BASE To Node: LD3 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 48.00 48.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 48.00 48.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 59.700 59.600 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Belcher Rd outfall to Lakewood Dr Name: BR2>BR1 From Node: BR2 Length(ft): 60.00 Group: BASE To Node: BR1 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 42.00 42.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 42.00 42.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 59.800 59.700 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw ' Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None ' Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Cross drain from east to west Belcher Rd --------------------------------------------- Name: LD3>76 From Node: -------- LD3 ---------------------- Length(ft): ------------------------ 1240.00 Group: BASE To Node: 76 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic ' Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 12 of 17 ' Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am Span(in): 48.00 48.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 48.00 48.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 59.600 57.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Lakewood Dr outfall --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: VOG>BR2 From Node: VOG Length(ft): 650.00 Group: BASE To Node: BR2 Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 36.00 36.00 Rise(in): 36.00 36.00 Invert(ft): 61.300 59.800 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Connects Village on the Green Lake to Belcher Rd MH BR2 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None -------------------------------------------------- Drop Structures Name: DSStM From Node: St Michael Length(ft): 50.00 Group: BASE To Node: 1E(SpreadSwale) Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Invert(ft): 69.000 68.600 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Weir information from field and SWFWMD file of record *** Weir 1 of 2 for Drop Structure DSStM *** Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Solution Incs: 10 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 TABLE Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. . Page 13 of 17 ' Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am ' Span(in): 62.00 Invert(ft): 70.200 Rise(in): 9999.00 Control Elev(ft): 70.200 *** Weir 2 of 2 for Drop Structure DSStM *** ' TABLE Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Vertical: Mavis Top Clip(in): 0.000 Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span(in): 62.00 Invert(ft): 69.140 Rise(in): 4.00 Control Elev(ft): 69.140 ---------------------------------------- ___= Weirs ' Name: CYC>C3 From Node: WETLAND-CYC Group: BASE To Node: C3(CHANNEL A) Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Gravel Geometry: Rectangular ' Span(in): 600.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 71.500 Control Elevation(ft): 71.500 ' TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.600 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 ' Overflow from Wetland CYC to Channel A ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LDSump>ChB From Node: LDSump Group: BASE To Node: Channel B Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 456.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 46.000 Control Elevation(ft): 46.000 TABLE ' Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Existing weir at west side of sump for Lakewood Drive outfall pipe ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Pondl>CYC From Node: Pond 1/CYB Group: BASE To Node: WETLAND-CYC Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Gravel Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 1200.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 72.400 Control Elevation(ft): 72.400 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 ' Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Connection between wetland CYB and CYC Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 14 of 17 ' Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Pond2>Comm. From Node: Pond 2/CYA/CYD Group: BASE To Node: Commercial Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Gravel Geometry: Trapezoidal Bottom Width(ft): 50.00 Left Side Slope(h/v): 5.00 Right Side Slope(h/v): 5.00 Invert(ft): 70.800 Control Elevation(ft): 70.800 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 9999.00 TABLE Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.600 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Overflow Pond 2, Wetlands CYA and CYD ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: StM>LD3 From Node: St Michael Group: BASE To Node: LD3 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Gravel Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 240.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 71.400 Control Elevation(ft): 71.400 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.600 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Weir discharge overbank to Belcher Rd: overflow from pond to driveway then along north side of driveway wes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: W1E>LD3 From Node: 1E(SpreadSwale) Group: BASE To Node: LD3 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Gravel Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 960.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 70.100 Control Elevation(ft): 70.100 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.600 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Over Belcher Rd right-of-way line at west end of golf course ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: W2E>IE From Node: 2E(WetlandCYE) Group: BASE To Node: 1E(SpreadSwale) Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Gravel Geometry: Trapezoidal Bottom Width(ft): 10.00 Left Side Slope(h/v): 0.01 Right Side Slope(h/v): 0.00 Invert(ft): 71.370 Control Elevation(ft): 71.370 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 9999.00 TABLE Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 15 of 17 ' Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am Weir Discharge Coef: 2.600 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Cart path ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Wetland CYF>lE From Node: 3E(WetlandCYF) Group: BASE To Node: 1E(SpreadSwale) Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Trapezoidal Bottom Width(ft): 1.00 Left Side Slope(h/v): 4.00 Right Side Slope(h/v): 5.00 Invert(ft): 70.000 Control Elevation(ft): 70.000 Struct Opening Dim(ft): 9999.00 TABLE Bottom Clip(ft): 0.000 Top Clip(ft): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.600 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Outfall from Wetland CYF. Wetland partly in Village on the Green ----------------------------------------------------------- Hydrology Simulations Name: Existing Filename: K:\169\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\Existing.R32 Override Defaults: No Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 11.000 30.00 13.000 5.00 24.000 15.00 40.000 30.00 ----------------------------------------------------- Routing Simulations Name: Existing Hydrology Sim: Existing Filename: K:\169\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\Existing.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 ' Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) -------------- Print Inc(min) - --------------- 10.000 60.000 13.000 5.000 18.000 10.000 30.000 60.000 Group --------- - Run BASE Yes Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 16 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Input 8-24-05, 10:57 am - ----------------------------------------------------- Boundary Conditions Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 17 of 17 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Node Max 8-24-05, 10:56 am Name Group Simulation Max Time Stage hrs 1E(SpreadSwale) BASE Existing 12.43 2E(WetlandCYE) BASE Existing 12.74 3E(WetlandCYF) BASE Existing 12.25 68 BASE Existing 12.28 70 BASE Existing 12.28 73 BASE Existing 12.30 76 BASE Existing 12.31 BELCHER BASE Existing 13.00 BR1 BASE Existing 12.33 BR2 BASE Existing 12.33 C1(CHANNEL A) BASE Existing 16.00 C2(CHANNEL A) BASE Existing 16.00 C3(CHANNEL A) BASE Existing 16.00 Channel B BASE Existing 0.00 Commercial BASE Existing 0.00 LD3 BASE Existing 12.33 LDSump BASE Existing 12.28 Pond 1/CYB BASE Existing 12.22 Pond 2/CYA/CYD BASE Existing 12.45 St Michael BASE Existing 12.37 VOG BASE Existing 14.32 WETLAND-CYC BASE Existing 12.24 Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs 70.373 70.700 0.0044 42470 12.33 34.173 12.48 33.908 71.496 73.000 -0.0024 28984 12.08 13.037 12.74 4.712 70.850 73.000 0.0004 16121 12.00 10.268 12.22 7.737 53.709 47.000 -0.0114 206 12.27 228.607 12.27 228.596 59.455 51.500 0.0292 177 12.27 222.684 12.28 222.654 63.026 61.000 0.0354 153 12.00 123.670 12.36 122.565 66.526 63.000 0.0241 260 12.33 121.405 12.00 122.747 69.500 72.000 0.0005 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 68.693 70.000 -0.0360 133 13.87 49.318 13.84 49.477 68.311 70.000 0.0290 184 15.68 45.088 16.52 45.542 70.000 72.000 0.0013 0 12.17 12.376 0.00 0.000 70.500 70.000 0.0007 0 12.25 11.929 0.00 0.000 71.000 72.000 0.0009 0 12.22 32.088 0.00 0.000 45.000 47.000 0.0000 0 12.28 228.552 0.00 0.000 70.000 72.000 0.0000 0 12.42 42.952 0.00 0.000 68.694 70.000 0.0057 252 12.85 75.046 12.82 74.205 47.523 47.000 0.0050 6541 12.27 228.596 12.28 228.552 72.542 73.000 -0.5000 53717 12.08 19.250 12.22 17.148 71.213 72.000 0.0014 58936 12.25 37.162 12.45 35.604 71.904 71.200 -0.0016 20085 12.17 33.116 12.37 29.641 66.835 70.000 -0.0020 430806 12.17 355.928 15.68 38.373 71.788 73.000 0.0003 14300 12.20 20.397 12.24 20.142 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page I of 1 Costa Verde at Countryside (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Existing Conditions 25/24 Link Max 8-24-05, 10:56 am Max Time Max Max Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Flow Flow Delta Q US Stage US Stage DS Stage DS Stage hrs cfs cfs hrs ft hrs ft 1E>BR2 BASE Existing 11.88 7.039 -3.226 12.43 70.373 12.33 68.311 1E>BR2(19x30) BASE Existing 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.000 2E>lE BASE Existing 12.74 3.553 0.354 12.74 71.496 12.67 70.705 68>LDSump BASE Existing 12.27 228.596 14.217 12.28 53.709 12.28 47.523 70>68 BASE Existing 12.28 222.654 -16.288 12.28 59.455 12.28 53.709 73>70 BASE Existing 12.36 122.565 14.243 12.30 63.026 12.28 59.455 76>73 BASE Existing 12.00 122.747 19.052 12.31 66.526 12.30 63.026 BR1>LD3 BASE Existing 13.84 49.477 -6.639 12.33 68.693 12.33 68.694 BR2>BR1 BASE Existing 16.52 45.542 22.923 12.33 68.311 12.33 68.693 CYC>C3 BASE Existing 12.24 20.142 0.017 12.24 71.788 16.00 71.000 DSStM BASE Existing 12.34 11.061 3.482 12.37 71.904 12.43 70.373 LD3>76 BASE Existing 12.82 74.205 -1.826 12.33 68.694 12.31 66.526 LDSump>ChB BASE Existing 12.28 228.552 0.139 12.28 47.523 0.00 45.000 Pondl>CYC BASE Existing 12.22 17.148 0.021 12.22 72.542 12.24 71.788 Pond2>Comm. BASE Existing 12.45 35.604 -0.015 12.45 71.213 0.00 70.000 StM>LD3 BASE Existing 12.37 18.584 0.016 12.37 71.904 12.33 68.694 VOG>BR2 BASE Existing 15.68 38.373 4.954 14.32 66.835 12.33 68.311 W1E>LD3 BASE Existing 12.43 29.588 0.023 12.43 70.373 12.33 68.694 W2E>lE BASE Existing 12.74 1.159 -0.001 12.74 71.496 12.43 70.373 Florida Design Consultants, Inc, Palm Harbor FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 100 Area: On-site = 10.620 Off-site = 0.000 A (acres) = 10.620 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG CN Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 8.610 B/D, D 92 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 B/D, D 98 Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D 79 Wooded (average) 0.000 C 74 Open space good 0.640 B/D, D 80 Wetlands 0.000 B/D, D 95 Water (Pond @ NWL) 1.370 --- 100 Total 10.620 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. CN = 92.3 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 27.3 0 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: Channelized Flow: L 0 L 0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(subl)` 0.4 5.60 0.01 0.00 s V t(sub2)2 0.021 2.3 0.00 v t(sub3) 1.5 0.0 T (minutes) = N/A Use-T (minutes) = 17.0 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 17.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrologyfor Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 100 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 105 Area: On-site = 0.320 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Road 0.050 Commercial (85% Impervious) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.200 Wetlands 0.000 Water (Pond @ NWL) 0.070 Total 0.320 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. A (acres) = 0.320 CN HSG B/D, D B/D, D C C B/D, D B/D, D 92 98 94 74 80 95 100 CN = 87.2 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t(sub 1)' 20.2 0 0.4 6.41 0.0227 0.00 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s V t(sub2)2 0 0.021 2.3 0.00 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 0 1.5 0.0 T (minutes) = N/A Use-T (minutes) = 15.2 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 15.2 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 105 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 110 Area: On-site = 2.430 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 1.480 Parking @ cabana (120'x65') 0.180 Commercial (85% Impervious) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.670 Wetlands 0.000 Water (Pond @ NWL) 0.100 Total 2.430 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of c (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) 6.8 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: segments) L N 70 0.4 L s 80 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 0 1.5 A (acres) = 2.430 HSG B/D, D B/D, D C C B/D, D B/D, D CN 92 98 94 74 80 95 100 CN = 89.5 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)` 9.67 0.05 6.81 V t(sub2)2 2.3 0.57 t(sub3) 0.0 T (minutes) = N/A Use-T (minutes) = 15.5 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 15.5 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 110 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin C1- Channel A ditch Area: On-site = 1.250 Off-site = 0.000 A (acres) = 1.250 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.650 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (1300'x20') 0.600 Total 1.250 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 27.3 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 1100 1.5 T (minutes) = 12.2 Use-T (minutes) = 12.2 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 92 98 79 74 89 95 100 CN = 89.1 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub1)` 5.60 0.01 0.00 V t(sub2)z 2.3 0.00 t(sub3) 12.2 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls C1 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin C2 - Channel A ditch Area: On-site = 1.150 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.990 Wetlands 0.000 Water (250'x20') 0.160 Total 1.150 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 27.3 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 350 1.5 T (minutes) = 3.9 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 A (acres) = 1.150 HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN 92 98 79 74 80 95 100 CN = 82.8 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)' 5.60 0.01 0.00 V t(sub2)2 2.3 0.00 t(sub3) 3.9 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis C2 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin C3 - Channel A ditch Area: On-site = 0.880 Off-site = 0.000 A (acres) = 0.880 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.630 Wetlands 0.000 Water (550'x20') 0.250 Total 0.880 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 27.3 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 350 1.5 T (minutes) = 3.9 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 92 98 79 74 80 95 100 CN = 85.7 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 5.60 0.01 0.00 V t(sub2)2 2.3 0.00 t(sub3) 3.9 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls C3 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 120 Area: On-site = 16.180 Off-site = 0.000 A (acres) = 16.180 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG CN Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 13.780 B/D, D 92 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 B/D, D 98 Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D 79 Wooded (average) 0.000 C 74 Open space good 1.150 B/D, D 80 Wetlands 0.300 B/D, D 95 Water (Pond @ NWL) 0.900 --- 100 Total 16.130 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. CN = 91.6 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 27.3 0 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: Channelized Flow: L 0 L 0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(sub 1) 0.4 5.60 0.01 0.00 s V t(sub2)2 0.021 2.3 0.00 v t(sub3) 1.5 0.0 T (minutes) = N/A Use-T (minutes) = 18.0 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 18.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 120 8/24/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain VOG Area: On-site = 1.950 Off-site = 84.150 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 72.490 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 1.950 Wetlands 3.910 Water (Pond @ NWL) 7.750 Total 86.100 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 27.3 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 1150 2 A (acres) = 86.100 HSG CN B/D, D 92 B/D, D 98 B/D, D 79 C 74 B/D, D 80 B/D, D 95 --- 100 CN = 92.6 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(subl)` 5.60 0.01 0.00 V t(sub2)Z 2.3 0.00 t(sub3) 9.6 T (minutes) = 9.6 Use-T (minutes) = 20.0 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 20.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis VOG 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Commercial Area: On-site = 0.440 Off-site = 0.540 A (acres) = 0.980 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Commercial (85% Imp) 0.540 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.440 Wetlands 0.000 Water (Pond @ NWL) 0.000 Total 0.980 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 27.3 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 800 1.5 92 98 95 74 80 95 100 CN = 88.3 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1) 5.60 0.01 0.00 V t(sub2)2 2.3 0.00 t(sub3) 8.9 T (minutes) = 8.9 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 0.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis COMM 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain NE Corner Area: On-site = 0.150 Off-site = 0.000 A (acres) = 0.150 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.150 Wetlands 0.000 Water (Pond @ NWL) 0.000 Total 0.150 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 27.3 0 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.021 Channelized Flow: L v 200 1.5 92 98 79 74 80 95 100 CN = 80.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub l )' 5.60 0.01 0.00 V t(sub2)2 2.3 0.00 t(sub3) 2.2 T (minutes) = 2.2 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 0.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls NE 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Wetland MH Area: On-site = 0.150 Off-site = 0.700 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.000 Wetlands 0.150 Water (Pond @ NWL) 0.000 Total 0.150 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. A (acres) = 0.850 HSG CN B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D BID, D 92 98 79 74 80 95 100 CN = 95.0 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t(sub 1) 27.3 0 0.4 5.60 0.01 0.00 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s V t(sub2)2 0 0.021 2.3 0.00 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 50 1.5 0.6 T (minutes) = 0.6 Use-T (minutes) = 10.0 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 0.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis WetlandMH 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed VOG to Channel A ditch Area: On-site = 0.280 Composite CN: Off-site = 0.850 Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 1.130 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.000 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 1.130 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 7.2 78 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.005 Channelized Flow: L v 780 2 A (acres) = 1.130 HSG CN B/D, D 92 B/D, D 98 B/D, D 79 C 74 B/D, D 80 B/D, D 95 --- 100 CN = 92.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1)' 9.49 0.0539 7.16 V t(sub2)2 1.1 0.00 t(sub3) 6.5 T (minutes) = 13.7 Use-T (minutes) = 13.7 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis VOGtoChA 8/24/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 130 Area: On-site = 4.600 Off-site = 0.000 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 3.890 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.330 Wetlands 0.000 Water (Pond @ NWL) 0.380 Total 4.600 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D A (acres) = 4.600 CN 92 98 79 74 80 95 100 CN = 91.8 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N I S t(subl)' 27.3 0 0.4 5.60 0.01 0.00 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s V t(sub2)2 0 0.021 2.3 0.00 Channelized Flow: L v t(sub3) 0 1.5 0.0 T (minutes) = N/A Use-T (minutes) = 17.0 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 17.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls 130 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Terrain Basin 131 Area: On-site = 2.800 Off-site = 0.000 A (acres) = 2.800 Composite CN: Land-Use Area HSG CN Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 2.680 B/D, D 92 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 B/D, D 98 Wooded (average) 0.000 B/D, D 79 Wooded (average) 0.000 C 74 Open space good 0.000 B/D, D 80 Wetlands 0.000 B/D, D 95 Water (Pond @ NWL) 0.120 --- 100 Total 2.800 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. CN = 92.3 Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) (Not less than 10.0 min) Overland Flow: t(trial) L 27.3 0 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L 0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve N I S t(sub 1)' 0.4 5.60 0.01 0.00 s V t(sub2)2 0.021 2.3 0.00 Channelized Flow: L 0 v t(sub3) 1.5 0.0 T (minutes) = N/A Use-T (minutes) = 16.0 Estimated StormTab (minutes) = 16.0 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F. p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis 131 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Basin 3/Wetland CYF (Includes a portion of Village on the Green) Area: On-site = 0.440 Off-site = 0.950 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.960 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 0.230 Wetlands 0.200 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 1.390 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 7.2 78 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.005 Channelized Flow: L v 555 2 A (acres) = 1.390 HSG CN B/D, D 92 B/D, D 98 B/D, D 79 C 74 B/D, D 80 B/D, D 95 --- 100 CN = 90.4 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1) I 9.49 0.0539 7.16 V t(sub2)z 1.1 0.00 t(sub3) 4.6 T (minutes) = 11.8 Use-T (minutes) = 11.8 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xis Basin 3 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Bypass (St Michael Archangel/North Project Boundary/Belcher Rd swale) Area: On-site = 0.640 Off-site = 0.650 A (acres) = 1.290 Composite CN: Land-Use Area Residential (1/8 acre or less, 65% Imp.) 0.000 Parking @ clubhouse 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Wooded (average) 0.000 Open space good 1.290 Wetlands 0.000 Water (@ NWL) 0.000 Total 1.290 Note: If existing soils are B/D or D, use HSG = D for developed conditions. HSG B/D, D B/D, D B/D, D C B/D, D B/D, D CN Time of Concentration (Sum of Segments) Overland Flow: t(trial) L N 7.2 78 0.4 Shallow Concentrated (Rill) Flow: L s 0 0.005 Channelized Flow: L v 555 2 T (minutes) = 11.8 Use-T (minutes) = 11.8 1. Equation (4-3), Hillsborough County Stormwater Management Technical Manual, p. 25 2. From equation for Figure 3-1, USDA, SCS, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR 55, Appendix F, p. F-1 92 98 79 74 80 95 100 CN = 80.0 25 year Zone 6 IDF curve I S t(sub 1) 9.49 0.0539 7.16 V t(sub2)z 1.1 0.00 t(sub3) 4.6 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropCondHydrologicTerrainCEGC.xls Bypass 8/23/2005 Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Pond100 Water Quality Treat Onsite Area [ac]: 10.62 Treat Runoff Depth [in]: 1.0 Treat Vol. (Onsite) [ac-ft]: 0.885 Add'1 Treat Vol. [ac-ft]: 0 Total Treat Vol [ac-ft]: 0.885 Depth of Treatment [ft]: 0.85 Pond Stage/Storage Area at TOP [ac]: 2.100 Area [ac]: 0.960 Stage EL Area 75.00 2.23 74.50 2.07 74.00 1.91 73.00 1.59 72.00 1.28 71.85 1.23 71.70 1.18 71.00 0.96 Treat Offsite Area [ac]: 0.00 Computed Runoff Depth [in]: 0.00 Treat Vol. (Offsite) [ac-ft]: 0.000 Min littoral area [% NWL]: 20% Minimum littoral area [acres]: 0.19 TOP El [ft]: 74.6 EL [ft] 71.00 Treat AccumVol 6.37 5.30 4.31 2.55 1.12 DLW 0.93 0.75 NWL 0.00 Orifice Sizing Calculations: Orifice size [inches] release 1/2 vol EL AREA 1NCR HALF h VOL VOL 71.85 1.229 0.0973 0.4663 0.81 71.77 1.204 0.0953 0.3690 0.73 71.69 1.179 0.0933 0.2737 0.65 71.61 1.153 0.0912 0.1805 0.57 71.53 1.128 0.0892 0.0892 0.49 71.45 1.103 Attenuate AccumVol 5.62 4.55 3.56 1.80 0.37 0.18 36HR 0.00 2.11 C = 0.6 Q INCR TOTAL TIME TIME 0.1052 11.19073 0.0999 11.5425 0.0943 11.97205 0.0883 12.50682 0.0818 13.18957 *City of Clearwater requires 35% for each wet pond Use 35%* each pond 11.2 22.7 34.7 DLW36HR 47.2 60.4 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropPondsCEGC.xls Pond 100 8/23/2005 3:47 PM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Ponds 105-110 Treatment Calculations (Equalized Ponds) Water Quality Treat Onsite Area [ac]: 2.75 Treat Runoff Depth [in]: 1.0 Treat Vol. (Onsite) [ac-ft]: 0.229 Add'1 Treat Vol. [ac-ft]: 0 Total Treat Vol [ac-ft]: 0.229 Depth of Treatment [ft]: 1.20 Pond Stage/Storage Area at TOP [ac]: 0.410 Area [ac]: 0.210 Stage EL Area 75.00 0.41 74.50 0.38 74.00 0.34 73.50 0.31 73.00 0.28 72.70 0.26 72.50 0.24 71.50 0.18 Treat Offsite Area [ac]: 0.00 Computed Runoff Depth [in]: 0.00 Treat Vol. (Offsite) [ac-ft]: 0.000 Min littoral area [% NWL]: Minimum littoral area [acres]: TOP El [ft]: 75.0 EL [ft] 72.00 Treat AccumVol 1.03 0.83 0.65 0.49 0.34 DLW 0.26 0.21 NWL 0.00 Orifice Sizing Calculations: Orifice size [inches] release 1 /2 vol EL AREA INCR HALF h VOL VOL 72.70 0.257 0.0253 0.1200 1.15 72.60 0.250 0.0247 0.0947 1.05 72.50 0.243 0.0240 0.0700 0.95 72.40 0.237 0.0233 0.0460 0.85 72.30 0.230 0.0227 0.0227 0.75 72.20 0.223 Attenuate AccumVol Treatment calculations 28% Use 35%* 0.06 each pond 0.97 C = 0.6 Q INCR TOTAL TIME TIME 0.0265 11.56815 0.0253 11.78789 0.0241 12.05785 0.0228 12.39332 0.0214 12.81673 *City of Clearwater requires 35% for each wet pond 11.6 23.4 35.4 DLW36HR 47.8 60.6 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropPondsCEGC.xls Pond 105-110Treat 8/23/2005 3:47 PM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Pond 105 Stage/Area Water Quality Treat Onsite Area [ac]: N/A Treat Runoff Depth [in]: 1.0 Treat Vol. (Onsite) [ac-ft]: N/A Add'1 Treat Vol. [ac-ft]: 0 Total Treat Vol [ac-ft]: N/A Depth of Treatment [ft]: N/A Pond Stage/Storage Area at TOP [ac]: 0.180 Area [ac]: 0.090 Stage EL Area 75.00 0.18 74.50 0.17 74.00 0.15 73.50 0.14 73.00 0.12 72.50 0.11 71.50 0.08 NWL Orifice Sizing Calculations: Attenuation Calculations Treat Offsite Area [ac]: 0.00 Computed Runoff Depth [in]: 0.00 Treat Vol. (Offsite) [ac-ft]: 0.000 Min littoral area [% NWL]: 35%* Minimum littoral area [acres]: 0.03 TOP El [ft]: 75.0 NWL EL [ft] 72.00 AccumVol 0.36 0.27 0.19 0.12 0.06 0.00 36 Hr *City of Clearwater requires 35% for each wet pond Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropPondsCEGC.xls Pond 105 8/23/2005 3:47 PM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Pond 110 Stage/Area Water Quality Treat Onsite Area [ac]: N/A Treat Runoff Depth [in]: 1.0 Treat Vol. (Onsite) [ac-ft]: N/A Add'1 Treat Vol. [ac-ft]: 0 Total Treat Vol [ac-ft]: N/A Depth of Treatment [ft]: N/A Pond Stage/Storage Area at TOP [ac]: 0.230 Area [ac]: 0.120 Stage EL Area 75.00 0.23 74.50 0.21 74.00 0.19 73.50 0.18 73.00 0.16 72.50 0.14 71.50 0.10 NWL Orifice Sizing Calculations: Attenuation Calculations Treat Offsite Area [ac]: 0.00 Computed Runoff Depth [in]: 0.00 Treat Vol. (Offsite) [ac-ft]: 0.000 Min littoral area [% NWL]: 35%* Minimum littoral area [acres]: 0.04 TOP El [ft]: 75.0 NWL EL [ft] 72.00 AccumVol 0.46 0.35 0.25 0.16 0.07 0.00 36 Hr *City of Clearwater requires 35% for each wet pond Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropPondsCEGC.xls Pond 110 8123/2005 3:47 PM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Pond 120 Water Quality Treat Onsite Area [ac]: 16.33 Treat Runoff Depth [in]: 1.0 Treat Vol. (Onsite) [ac-ft]: 1.361 Add'1 Treat Vol. [ac-ft]: 0 Total Treat Vol [ac-ft]: 1.361 Depth of Treatment [ft]: 1.35 Pond Stage/Storage Area at TOP [ac]: 1.790 NWL [ac]: 0.810 Stage EL Area 73.00 1.64 72.50 1.54 72.00 1.44 71.50 1.33 70.65 1.15 70.40 1.10 69.30 0.87 Treat Offsite Area [ac]: 0.00 Computed Runoff Depth [in]: 0.00 Treat Vol. (Offsite) [ac-ft]: 0.000 Min littoral area [% NWL]: 32% Use 35%* Minimum littoral area [acres]: 0.26 each pond TOP El [ft]: EL [ft] Treat AccumVol 4.66 3.86 3.12 2.42 DLW 1.37 1.09 NWL 0.00 Orifice Sizing Calculations: Orifice size [inches] release 1/2 vol: 0.80 EL AREA INCR HALF h Q VOL VOL 73.7 69.0 Attenuate AccumVol 3.57 2.77 2.03 1.34 0.28 36hr 0.00 C = 0.6 INCR TOTAL TIME TIME 70.65 1.154 0.1144 0.7061 70.60 0.1412 9.798556 70.55 1.133 0.1123 0.5917 70.50 0.1411 9.626724 70.45 1.112 0.1102 0.4794 70.40 0.1410 9.454652 70.35 1.091 0.1081 0.3693 70.30 0.1409 9.282341 70.25 1.071 0.1060 0.2611 70.20 0.1408 9.109789 70.15 1.050 0.1551 0.1551 70.08 0.1407 13.34064 70.00 1.019 *City of Clearwater requires 35% for each wet pond 9.8 19.4 28.9 38.2 DLW36HR: use 70.40 47.3 60.6 Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropPondsCEGC.xls Pond 120 8/23/2005 3:47 PM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Ponds 130-131 Treatment Calculations (Equalized Ponds) Water Quality Treat Onsite Area [ac]: 7.40 Treat Offsite Area [ac]: 0.00 Treat Runoff Depth [in]: 1.0 Computed Runoff Depth [in]: 0.00 Treat Vol. (Onsite) [ac-ft]: 0.617 Treat Vol. (Offsite) [ac-ft]: 0.000 Add'l Treat Vol. [ac-ft]: 0 Total Treat Vol [ac-ft]: 0.617 Min littoral area [% NWL]: 16% Use 35%* Depth of Treatment [ft]: 0.70 Minimum littoral area [acres]: 0.13 each pond Pond Stage/Storage Area at TOP [ac]: 1.080 NWL [ac]: 0.820 Stage EL Area 73.00 1.60 72.50 1.47 72.00 1.34 71.50 1.21 70.70 1.00 70.50 0.95 70.00 0.82 TOP El [ft]: EL [ft] 71.0 70.0 Treat AccumVol 3.63 2.86 2.16 1.52 DLW 0.64 0.44 NWL 0.00 Orifice Sizing Calculations: Orifice size [inches] release 1/2 vol: 0.55 EL AREA INCR HALF h Q VOL VOL 70.70 1.002 0.0695 0.3348 70.67 70.63 0.984 0.0779 0.2653 70.59 70.55 0.963 0.0478 0.1874 70.53 70.50 0.950 0.0472 0.1396 70.48 70.45 0.937 0.0465 0.0924 70.43 70.40 0.924 0.0459 0.0459 70.38 70.35 0.911 Attenuate AccumVol 2.99 2.22 1.52 0.88 0.00 C = 0.6 INCR TOTAL TIME TIME 0.0668 12.59331 12.6 0.0667 14.11719 26.7 0.0667 8.674049 35.4 DLW36HR 0.0667 8.559192 43.9 0.0667 8.444256 52.4 0.0666 8.329238 60.7 *City of Clearwater requires 35% for each wet pond Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropPondsCEGC.xls Pond 130-131Treat 8/23/2005 3:47 PM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Pond 130 Stage/Area Water Quality Treat Onsite Area [ac]: N/A Treat Runoff Depth [in]: 1.0 Treat Vol. (Onsite) [ac-ft]: N/A Add'1 Treat Vol. [ac-ft]: 0 Total Treat Vol [ac-ft]: N/A Depth of Treatment [ft]: N/A Pond Stage/Storage Area at TOP [ac]: 1.041 Area [ac]: 0.930 Stage EL Area 73.00 1.04 72.50 1.01 72.00 0.99 71.50 0.96 70.55 0.91 70.50 0.90 70.00 0.87 Orifice Sizing Calculations: See Pond 130-131 Treat Offsite Area [ac]: 0.00 Computed Runoff Depth [in]: 0.00 Treat Vol. (Offsite) [ac-ft]: 0.000 Min littoral area [% NWL]: 35%* Minimum littoral area [acres]: 0.31 TOP El [ft]: 73.0 EL [ft] 71.0 AccumVol 2.38 1.87 1.37 0.88 DLW 0.00 *City of Clearwater requires 35% for each wet pond Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropPondsCEGC.xls Pond 130 8/23/2005 3:47 PM Costa Verde at Countryside Drainage Report Proposed Pond 131 Water Quality Treat Onsite Area [ac]: N/A Treat Runoff Depth [in]: 1.0 Treat Vol. (Onsite) [ac-ft]: N/A Add'1 Treat Vol. [ac-ft]: 0 Total Treat Vol [ac-ft]: N/A Depth of Treatment [ft]: N/A Pond Stage/Storage Area at TOP [ac]: 0.220 Area at NWL [ac]: 0.110 Stage EL Area 73.00 0.22 72.50 0.20 72.00 0.18 71.50 0.17 70.55 0.13 70.50 0.13 70.00 0.11 Orifice Sizing Calculations: See Pond 130-131 Treat Offsite Area [ac]: 0.00 Computed Runoff Depth [in]: 0.00 Treat Vol. (Offsite) [ac-ft]: 0.000 Min littoral area [% NWL]: 35%* Minimum littoral area [acres]: 0.04 TOP El [ft]: 73.0 NWL EL [ft] 70.00 AccumVol 0.43 0.32 0.23 0.14 DLW 0.00 *City of Clearwater requires 35% for each wet pond Florida Design Consultants, New Port Richey FL PropPondsCEGC.xls Pond 131 8/23/2005 3:47 PM Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Basins Name: 100 Node: 100 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 17.00 Area(ac): 10.620 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.30 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 -------------------------- Name: 105 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 0.320 Curve Number: 87.20 DCIA M : 0.00 ------------------------------ Name: 110 ' Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 2.430 Curve Number: 89.50 DCIA M : 0.00 ------------------------------- Name: 120 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 16.180 Curve Number: 91.60 DCIA M : 0.00 -------------------------- Name: 130 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 4.600 Curve Number: 91.80 DCIA(%): 0.00 ----------------------------------------------- Node: 105 Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 15.20 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------------------------------ Node: 110 Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 15.50 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------------------------------- Node: 120 Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 18.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 --------------------------------------------------- Node: 130 Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 17.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ----------------------------------------- Name: 131 Node: 131 -------------------- Status: Onsite Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL S Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 16.00 Area(ac): 2.800 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.30 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: 3+VOG to ----------- CYF ------------------------------- Node: 3E(WetlandCYF) ----------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 11.80 Area(ac): 1.390 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.40 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(): 0.00 Discharge to existing wetland onsite and offsite ------------------------ Name: 68 ----------- ------------------------------- Node: 68 -------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 15.40 Area(ac): 1.600 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA($): 0.00 Existing single family ------------------------ Name: 70 ----------- ------------------------------- Node: 70 --------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 27.00 Area(ac): 30.700 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA($): 0.00 Existing single family ------------------------------ Name: 73 Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 0.200 Curve Number: 92.00 DCIAM: 0.00 Existing single family ----------------------------------------------- Node: 73 Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 12.40 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 -------------------- Name: 76 ------------ ------------------------------ Node: 76 ---------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 27.90 Area(ac): 20.700 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 19 1 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Curve Number: 92.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Existing single family ------------------------ Name: BR1 ------------ ----------------------------- Node: BR1 ----------- Status: ------------------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.500 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.20 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Existing single family: rear of lot drainage ------------------------ Name: BR2 ------------ ----------------------------- Node: LD3 ------------ Status: ----------------------- Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 6.640 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.50 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Drainage to Belcher Rd c urb inlets ------------------------ Name: BR3 ------------ ----------------------------- Node: BR1 ------------ Status: ----------------------- Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 23.80 Area(ac): 8.940 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.70 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Runoff to Belcher Rd cur b inlets to south from intersection with Countryside Blvd ------------------------ Name: BR4 ------------ --------- Node: --------------------- BR2 ---------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.840 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.70 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Runoff from Belcher Rd right-of-way vicinity south of BR2/VOG lake outfall ------------------------ Name: Bypass ------------ --------- Node: --------------------- SpreadSwaleBR ---------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 11.80 Area(ac): 1.290 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 80.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL I Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Name: Cl Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 1.250 Curve Number: 89.10 DCIA(%): 0.00 Node: Cl Status: Onsite Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 12.20 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ------------------------ Name: C2 ----------- ---------- Node: -------------------- C2 ----------------------- Status: Onsite ' Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 1.150 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 82.80 M ax Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: C3 ----------- ---------- Node: -------------------- C3 ----------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.880 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 ' Curve Number: 85.70 M ax Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: COMM ----------- ---------- Node: -------------------- Cl ----------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 0.980 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 88.30 M ax Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA M : 0.00 ---------------------------------- Name: MH Group: BASE Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Area(ac): 0.150 Curve Number: 95.00 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------------------------------ Node: VOG Status: Inactive Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Peaking Factor: 256.0 Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: NE Cor Node: Cl Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 4 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Area(ac): 0.150 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 80.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(°%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: StM ------- -------------- Node: -------------------- StM ----------- Status: ------------ Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 23.40 Area(ac): 9.150 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 91.90 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Basin to St Michael's detention pond - - ----- -- -- --------- -- Name: VOG ------- ---- Node: VOG Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 20.00 Area(ac): 86.100 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.60 M ax Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Existing multi-family projects to village on the Green lake. ------------------------ Name: VOG1 ------- -------------- Node: -- C3 Status: Inactive Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit H dro ra h Y 9 P Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 Area(ac): 1.130 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 87.50 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: VOG2 ------- -------------- Node: --------------------- VOG ----------- Status: ----------- Inactive Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 10.00 ' Area(ac): 1.700 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 84.10 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: VOG3 ------- -------------- Node: --------------------- VOG ---------- Status: ------------ Inactive Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 12.60 Area(ac): 2.500 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 86.80 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL I Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 5 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am -------------------- Name: VOGtoChA ----------- ------------------------------- Node: Cl ----------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 13.70 Area(ac): 1.130 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 92.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 --------------------------------------------------------- Nodes ------------ Name: 100 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 71.700 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 75.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) 71.000 0.9600 71.700 1.1800 72.000 1.2800 73.000 1.5900 74.000 1.9100 74.500 2.0700 75.000 2.2300 ------------------------ Name: 105 ------- Group: BASE Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) 72.500 0.1100 73.000 0.1200 74.000 0.1500 75.000 0.1800 ------------------------ Name: 110 ------- Group: BASE Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) ---------------------- Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ------------------------- Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ----------------------- Init Stage(ft): 72.500 Warn Stage(ft): 75.000 ---------------------- Init Stage(ft): 72.500 Warn Stage(ft): 75.000 71.000 0.0000 72.500 0.1400 73.000 0.1600 73.500 0.1800 74.000 0.1900 74.500 0.2100 75.000 0.2300 Name: 120 Group: BASE Type: Stage/Area ------------------------ Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 --------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 70.400 Warn Stage(ft): 74.000 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 6 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 69.300 0.8700 70.400 1.1000 71.500 1.3300 72.000 1.4400 72.500 1.5400 73.000 1.6400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 130 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 70.550 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 73.500 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 70.500 0.9000 70.550 0.9100 71.500 0.9600 72.000 0.9900 72.500 1.0100 73.000 1.0400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 130A Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 68.000 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 71.500 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Stage(ft) Area(ac) ---------- --------------- 68.000 0.0005 71.500 0.0005 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: 130B Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 67.800 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 70.500 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Stage(ft) Area(ac) ---------- --------------- 67.800 0.0005 70.500 0.0005 ------------------------------------------------ Name: 131 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Group: BASE Type: Stage/Area ----------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 70.550 Warn Stage(ft): 73.500 Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 70.000 0.1100 70.500 0.1300 71.500 0.1700 72.000 0.1800 72.500 0.2000 73.000 0.2200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: 3E(WetlandCYF) Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 70.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 73.000 Type: Stage/Area Existing wetland onsite and offsite Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 7 of 19 ' Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Stage(ft) --------------- ---- Area(ac) ----------- 70.000 0.2000 71.000 0.4000 -------------------- Name: 68 ----------- ---------------- Base Flow(cfs): -------- 0.000 ------------ Init ------------ Stage(ft): ----------- 41.500 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 47.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Manhole at Lakewood Dr and Colony Dr Stage(ft) --------------- ---- Area(ac) ----------- 41.050 0.0008 46.000 0.0008 -------------------- Name: 70 ----------- ---------------- Base Flow(cfs): -------- 0.000 ------------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 45.100 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 51.500 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Manhole at Lakewood Dr and Southpointe Dr (48" RCP from south) Stage(ft) --------------- ---- Area(ac) ----------- 45.100 0.0010 51.000 0.0010 -------------------- Name: 73 ----------- ---------------- Base Flow(cfs): -------- 0.000 ------------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 50.700 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 61.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Manhole at Lakewood Dr and Pinewood Dr Stage(ft) --------------- ---- Area(ac) ----------- 50.700 0.0008 60.000 0.0008 -------------------- Name: 76 ----------- ---------------- Base Flow(cfs): -------- 0.000 ------------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 56.000 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 63.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Manhole at Lakewood Dr and Kenwood Dr Stage(ft) --------------- ---- Area(ac) ----------- 56.000 0.0008 63.000 0.0008 -------------------- Name: BR1 ----------- ---------------- Base Flow(cfs): -------- 0.000 ------------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 59.700 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 72.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Manhole on west side of Belcher Rd, 120 feet +/ - south of Lakewood Dr. (48" RCP from south, 42" RCP from we Stage(ft) --------------- ---- Area(ac) ----------- 59.700 0.0010 69.000 0.0010 -------------------- Name: BR2 ----------- ---------------- Base Flow(cfs): -------- 0.000 ------------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ----------- 59.800 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 8 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Manhole west side of Belcher Rd, opposite Manhole BR1 (15" Existing from north, 36" from east VOG lake, 36" Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 59.800 0.0010 69.000 0.0010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Cl Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 66.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 72.500 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) ---------- --------------- 0.00 66.000 12.00 69.500 16.00 70.000 40.00 66.000 100.00 66.000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: C2 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 67.500 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 75.000 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) ---------- --------------- 0.00 67.500 13.00 71.500 24.00 70.000 40.00 67.500 100.00 67.500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: C3 Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 67.700 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 75.000 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) --------------- ---- Stage(ft) ----------- 0.00 67.700 13.00 72.000 24.00 68.000 40.00 67.700 100.00 67.700 -------------------- Name: Channel ------------ B -------------------------- Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 --------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ------------ 45.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 47.000 Type: Time/Sta ge Curlew Creek Channel B Boundary condition Time(hrs) --------------- ---- Stage(ft) ----------- 0.00 45.000 12.50 45.000 14.00 45.000 24.00 45.000 40.00 45.000 -------------------- Name: LD3 ------------ -------------------------- Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 --------- Init ----------- Stage(ft): ------------ 59.600 Group: BASE Plunge Factor: 1.00 Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 Type: Manhole, Flat Floor Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 9 of 19 ' Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Manhole at Lakewood Dr and west side of Belcher Rd Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 59.600 0.0010 69.000 0.0010 ------------------------------------------------------- Name: LDSump Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ----------------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 35.500 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 47.000 Type: Stage/Area County maintained sump at east end of Lakewood Dr adjac ent to Channel B Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 35.500 0.0550 47.000 0.1450 ------------------------------------------------------- Name: SpreadSwaleBR Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ----------------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 68.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 70.200 Type: Stage/Area Proposed swale along Belcher Rd R/W Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 68.000 0.0520 70.000 0.1970 ------------------------------------------------------- Name: StM Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ----------------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 70.200 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 71.200 Type: Stage/Area Offsite detention pond w/ existing OCS at St Michael Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 69.140 0.2500 70.140 0.3200 71.140 0.4000 ------------------------------------------------------- Name: VOG Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 ----------------------------------- Init Stage(ft): 61.300 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 70.000 Type: Stage/Area Village on the Green lake Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- 60.000 4.6000 64.100 7.7500 69.100 11.6600 Pipes -------------------------- Name: 130A>130B From Node: 130A Length(ft): 105.00 Group: BASE To Node: 130B Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Horz Ellipse Horz Ellipse Flow: Both Span(in): 30.00 30.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 19.00 19.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 68.000 67.800 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.012000 0.012000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL I Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 10 of 19 ' Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None 130A is a grate inlet to receive discharge from wetland CYF and Pond 130 -------------------------------------------------- Name: 130B>BR2 From Node: 130B Group: BASE To Node: BR2 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 15.00 15.00 Rise(in): 15.00 15.00 Invert(ft): 67.800 61.800 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ---------------- Name: 131>130 Group: BASE UPSTREAM Geometry: Circular Span(in): 24.00 Rise(in): 24.00 Invert(ft): 68.900 Manning's N: 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 ------------------- From Node: 131 To Node: 130 DOWNSTREAM Circular 24.00 24.00 67.400 0.013000 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall -------------- Name: ------------- 68>LDSump ------------------------- From Node: 68 Group: BASE To Node: LDSump UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 60.00 60.00 Rise(in): 60.00 60.00 Invert(ft): 41.500 40.500 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 ------------------- Length(ft): Count: Friction Equation: Solution Algorithm: Flow: Entrance Loss Coef: Exit Loss Coef: Bend Loss Coef: Outlet Ctrl Spec: Inlet Ctrl Spec: Stabilizer option: ------------------ 470.00 1 Average Conveyance Automatic Both 0.50 0.50 0.00 Use do or tw Use do None -------------------------------------- Length(ft): 370.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL ----------------------------------------------- Length(ft): 550.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 11 of 19 ' Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: ' Circular Concr ete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHW A Inlet Edg e Description: Circular Concr ete: Square edge w/ headwall -------------- Name: ----------- 70>68 -------------------- From Node: ------- 70 ------------------------ Length(ft): ------------------------ 375.00 Group: BASE To Node: 68 Count: 1 ' Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 60.00 60.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 60.00 60.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 ' Invert(ft): 45.100 44.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ' Downstream FHWA Inlet Edg e Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall -------------- Name: ----------- 73>70 -------------------- From Node: -------- 73 ----------------------- Length(ft): ------------------------ 175.00 Group: BASE To Node: 70 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance ' UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 48.00 48.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 48.00 48.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 50.700 50.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edg e Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ---------- Nam--e-: - -- 7 -6>7---3 ----- ----------- -From-----Node• -- -7--6 ----- ------------- Leng----th-(--ft)--:- 2-2--5.--00 ------------------ Group: BASE To Node: 73 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: 1 Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 48.00 48.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 48.00 48.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 56.000 55.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 ' Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL 1 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 12 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ------------- Name: ------------- BR1>LD3 -------------------------- From Node: BR1 ----------------------- Length(ft): ------------------------ 150.00 Group: BASE To Node: LD3 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 48.00 48.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 48.00 48.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 59.700 59.600 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Name: - --- BR2---->BR1 ---- -------------- From ---- Node-: - BR2 - - - -- ------------------ Leng--th-(-ft--)-: -------------------- -- 60-.-00 Grou BASE To Node: B R 1 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both ' Span(in): 42.00 42.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 42.00 42.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 59.800 59.700 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw ' Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None ' Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concr ete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edg e Description: ' Circular Concr ete: Square edge w/ headwall Belcher Rd cro ss drain fr om east to west. Carries discharge from east side of Belcher Rd including VOG, Be -------------- Name: ----------- LD3>76 -------------------- From Node: ----- LD3 -------------------------- Length(ft): ------------------------ 1240.00 ' Group: BASE To Node: 76 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 48.00 48.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Rise(in): 48.00 48.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Invert(ft): 59.600 57.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do ' Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 13 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Lakewood Dr. outfall -------------- Name: ----------- P110>105 ------------------------ From Node: 110 Group: BASE To Node: 105 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 24.00 24.00 Rise(in): 24.00 24.00 Invert(ft): 70.000 69.210 Manning's N: 0.012000 0.012000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concr ete: Square edge w/ headwall --------------------------------------- Length(ft): 88.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: SpreadSwale>130 From Node: SpreadSwaleBR Length(ft): 65.00 Group: BASE To Node: 130B Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Horz Ellipse Horz Ellipse Span(in): 30.00 30.00 Rise(in): 19.00 19.00 Invert(ft): 68.000 67.800 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Horizontal Ellipse Concrete: Square edge with headwall -------------- Name: ----------- VOG>BR2 ------------------------ From Node: VOG Group: BASE To Node: BR2 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 36.00 36.00 Rise(in): 36.00 36.00 Invert(ft): 61.300 59.800 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Friction Equation: Solution Algorithm: Flow: Entrance Loss Coef: Exit Loss Coef: Bend Loss Coef: Outlet Ctrl Spec: Inlet Ctrl Spec: Stabilizer Option: Average Conveyance Automatic Both 0.50 0.50 0.00 Use do or tw Use do None ------------------------------------------- Length(ft): 650.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50 Exit Loss Coef: 0.50 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Stabilizer Option: None Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 14 of 19 1 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Connects Village on the Green lake to manhole in Belcher Rd east R/W ---------------------------------------- ----------- Drop Structures Name: 100>C3 From Node: 100 Group: BASE To Node: C3 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 36.00 36.00 Rise(in): 36.00 36.00 Invert(ft): 68.200 68.000 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure 100>C3 *** Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 24.00 Rise(in): 999.00 Length(ft): 100.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Solution Incs: 10 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Invert(ft): 71.700 Control Elev(ft): 71.700 ------------------------------------------------- ' Name: 105>C3 From Node: 105 Group: BASE To Node: C3 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 24.00 24.00 Rise(in): 24.00 24.00 Invert(ft): 68.000 67.800 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 ' Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ' Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure 105>C3 *** Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Flow: Both Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 10.00 Rise(in): 999.00 ------------------------------------------- Length(ft): 100.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Solution Incs: 10 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Invert(ft): 72.500 Control Elev(ft): 72.500 TABLE Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 15 of 19 ' Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am ------------------------------------------------- Name: 120>C1 From Node: 120 Group: BASE To Node: Cl UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Geometry: Circular Circular Span(in): 30.00 30.00 Rise(in): 30.00 30.00 Invert(ft): 67.200 67.000 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall ------------------ Length(ft): 100.00 Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Solution Algorithm: Automatic Flow: Both Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Solution Incs: 10 *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure 120>C1 *** TABLE Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Vertical: Fread Top Clip(in): 0.000 Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 ' Span(in): 26.00 Invert(ft): 70.400 Rise(in): 9999.00 Control Elev(ft): 70.400 ---------- -Name---: --13--0->-1-3-0A--- ----------- -From-----Node---:- -13--0 ---------------- - Len--g-th--(--ft-)• -- 80--.-00-------------- Group: BASE To Node: 130A Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Frictio n Equation: Average Conveyance Geometry: Circular Circular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Flow: Both Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Invert(ft): 68.200 68.000 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 ' Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Sol ution Incs: 10 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: ' Circular Concr ete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHW A Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concr ete: Square edge w/ headwall *** Weir 1 of 1 for Drop Structure 130>130A *** TABLE ' Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Vertical: Fread Top Clip(in): 0.000 Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 ' Span(in): 10.00 Invert(ft): 70.550 Rise(in): 9999.00 Control Elev(ft): 70.550 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: StM>SpreadSwale From Node: StM Length(ft): 50.00 Group: BASE To Node: SpreadSwaleBR Count: 1 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Average Conveyance Geometry: Circular Circular Solution Algorithm: Automatic Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 16 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am Span(in): 18.00 18.00 Flow: Both Rise(in): 18.00 18.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.500 Invert(ft): 69.000 68.600 Exit Loss Coef: 0.500 Manning's N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Solution Incs: 10 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edg e Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Existing OCS w/ 51-2" wei r *** Weir 1 of 2 for Drop Structure StM>SpreadSwale *** ? TABLE Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Vertical: Fread Top Clip(in): 0.000 Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span(in): 62.00 Invert(ft): 70.200 Rise(in): 9999.00 Control Elev(ft): 70.200 *** Weir 2 of 2 for Drop Structure StM>SpreadSwale *** TABLE Count: 1 Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Type: Vertical: Mavis Top Clip(in): 0.000 Flow: Both Weir Disc Coef: 3.200 Geometry: Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600 Span(in): 62.00 Invert(ft): 69.140 Rise(in): 4.00 Control Elev(ft): 69.140 Weirs -------------- Name: 3E>130A From Node: 3E(WetlandCYF) Group: BASE To Node: 130A Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Fread Geometry: Trapezoidal Bottom Width(ft): Left Side Slope(h/v): Right Side Slope(h/v): Invert(ft): Control Elevation(ft): Struct Opening Dim(ft): Bottom Clip(ft): Top Clip(ft): Weir Discharge Coef: Orifice Discharge Coef: 1.00 4.00 5.00 70.000 70.000 9999.00 TABLE 0.000 0.000 2.600 0.600 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: LDSump>ChB From Node: LDSump Group: BASE To Node: Channel B Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 456.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 46.000 Control Elevation(ft): 46.000 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 17 of 19 ' Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am ' Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 ' Existing weir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: SpreadSwale>LD3 From Node: SpreadSwaleBR ' Group: BASE To Node: LD3 Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Gravel Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 960.00 ' Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 70.100 Control Elevation(ft): 70.100 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.600 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 ' Overflow from swale ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: StMPond>LD3 From Node: StM Group: BASE To Node: LD3 ' Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Gravel Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 240.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 71.400 Control Elevation(ft): 71.400 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 2.600 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Overflow from St Michael's pond to Belcher Rd. Hydrology Simulations ======================================--==--------------------- ' Name: Proposed10Yr1Hr Filename: K:\169\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\Proposed10.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 1.00 Rainfall File: Fdot-1 Rainfall Amount(in): 3.30 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 1.000 5.00 2.000 10.00 3.000 15.00 6.000 30.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Proposed25/24 Filename: K:\169\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\Proposed25.R32 Override Defaults: No Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 11.000 30.00 13.000 5.00 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 18 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Input 8-24-05 9:41 am 24.000 15.00 40.000 30.00 -------------- Routing Simulations --------------------------------------------- Name: Proposed10Yr1Hr Hydrology Sim: Proposed10Yr1Hr Filename: K:\169\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\Proposed10.I32 Execute: No Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 6.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Use this for Stormtab Hydraulic Gradient Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) ------ --------- --------------- 1.000 5.000 2.000 10.000 3.000 15.000 6.000 20.000 Group Run --------------- ---- - BASE Yes ------------ Name: ------------------------------- Proposed25/24 Hydrology ------------------------------------------------------- Sim: Proposed25/24 Filename: K:\169\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\Proposed25.132 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max De lta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 24.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000 Bounda ry Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) 10.000 60.000 13.000 5.000 18.000 10.000 40.000 60.000 Group Run --------------- --- BASE Yes Boundary Conditions Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL I Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 19 of 19 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Basin Max 8-24-05 2:10 pm Simulation Basin Group Time Max Flow Max Volume Volume hrs cfs in ft3 Proposed25/24 100 Proposed25/24 105 Proposed25/24 110 Proposed25/24 120 Proposed25/24 130 Proposed25/24 131 Proposed25/24 3+VOG to CYF Proposed25/24 68 Proposed25/24 70 Proposed25/24 73 Proposed25/24 76 Proposed25/24 BR1 Proposed25/24 BR2 Proposed25/24 BR3 Proposed25/24 BR4 Proposed25/24 Bypass Proposed25/24 Cl Proposed25/24 C2 Proposed25/24 C3 Proposed25/24 COMM Proposed25/24 MH Proposed25/24 NE Cor Prop03ed25/24 StM Proposed25/24 VOG Proposed25/24 VOG1 Proposed25/24 VOG2 Proposed25/24 VOG3 Proposed25/24 VOGtoChA BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE BASE 12.09 44.862 12.09 1.356 12.09 10.462 12.12 66.486 12.09 19.354 12.09 12.171 12.06 6.747 12.08 7.057 12.18 103.092 12.07 0.964 12.21 68.369 12.04 2.584 12.04 34.402 12.16 31.756 12.04 4.359 12.06 5.508 12.06 5.917 12.04 5.468 12.04 4.342 12.04 4.975 12.04 0.801 12.04 0.684 12.17 33.130 12.13 339.336 12.04 5.690 12.04 8.224 12.07 11.402 12.09 5.230 8.067310995.092 7.446 8649.539 7.726 68147.548 7.983468884.337 8.007133693.283 8.068 82005.026 7.837 39542.754 8.031 46643.395 8.032895071.830 8.029 5829.359 8.031603477.246 7.813 14180.960 7.850189202.131 7.870255408.356 7.874 24009.318 6.565 30743.754 7.679 34842.464 6.910 28844.285 7.265 23206.088 7.582 26971.951 8.395 4571.074 6.566 3575.165 8.017266286.296 8.105 ********* 7.484 30700.234 7.069 43622.160 7.399 67142.523 8.031 32942.061 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL ' Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Node Max 8-24-05 10:41 am Max Time Name Group Simulation Stage hrs Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs 100 BASE Proposed25/24 12.90 73.601 75.000 -0.0007 77644 12.08 44.704 12.90 16.781 105 BASE Proposed25/24 12.67 74.209 75.000 -0.0009 6812 12.22 7.120 12.67 5.960 110 BASE Proposed25/24 12.62 74.320 75.000 -0.0008 8839 12.08 10.436 12.32 5.964 120 BASE Proposed25/24 12.80 73.050 74.000 -0.0012 71871 12.08 65.811 12.80 29.905 130 BASE Proposed25/24 13.18 72.692 73.500 0.0007 44520 12.10 25.072 13.18 8.357 130A BASE Proposed25/24 12.87 70.803 71.500 -0.0050 120 12.82 9.863 12.82 9.863 130B BASE Proposed25/24 12.33 70.404 70.500 -0.0050 141 15.62 7.683 11.80 7.242 131 BASE Proposed25/24 12.76 72.907 73.500 0.0007 9444 12.08 12.140 12.31 6.457 3E(WetlandCYF) BASE Proposed25/24 12.75 70.821 73.000 -0.0004 15863 12.08 6.659 12.08 3.816 68 BASE Proposed25/24 12.26 53.878 47.000 -0.0132 206 12.26 231.504 12.26 231.484 70 BASE Proposed25/24 12.26 59.774 51.500 0.0308 177 12.25 225.533 12.26 225.439 73 BASE Proposed25/24 12.27 63.447 61.000 0.0373 153 11.98 128.092 12.30 123.664 76 BASE Proposed25/24 12.27 67.033 63.000 -0.0285 260 12.25 122.775 11.98 127.211 BR1 BASE Proposed25/24 12.27 69.216 72.000 -0.0345 133 13.83 48.118 13.82 48.376 BR2 BASE Proposed25/24 12.28 68.733 70.000 0.0249 164 15.81 43.858 15.80 43.865 Cl BASE Proposed25/24 16.00 70.000 72.500 0.0010 0 12.46 36.674 0.00 0.000 C2 BASE Proposed25/24 13.00 71.500 75.000 0.0011 0 12.00 5.296 0.00 0.000 C3 BASE Proposed25/24 13.00 72.000 75.000 0.0011 0 12.71 23.631 0.00 0.000 Channel B BASE Proposed25/24 0.00 45.000 47.000 0.0000 0 12.27 231.413 0.00 0.000 LD3 BASE Proposed25/24 12.28 69.223 70.000 0.0081 252 12.82 73.602 12.80 72.289 LDSump BASE Proposed25/24 12.27 47.536 47.000 0.0050 6545 12.26 231.484 12.27 231.413 SpreadSwaleBR BASE Proposed25/24 12.31 70.313 70.200 0.0050 9573 12.19 15.636 12.24 15.377 StM BASE Proposed25/24 12.36 71.904 71.200 -0.0016 20088 12.17 33.117 12.36 29.904 VOG BASE Proposed25/24 14.25 66.629 70.000 0.0015 423774 12.17 335.181 15.81 37.068 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ©2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Pagel of l Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 25/24 Link Max 8-24-05 10:42 am Name Group Simulation Max Time Flow hrs Max Flow cfs Max Delta Q cfs Max Time US Stage hrs Max US Stage ft Max Time DS Stage hrs Max DS Stage ft 100>C3 BASE Proposed25/24 12.90 16.781 -0.009 12.90 73.601 13.00 72.000 105>C3 BASE Proposed25/24 12.67 5.960 -0.003 12.67 74.209 13.00 72.000 120>C1 BASE Proposed25/24 12.80 29.905 -0.017 12.80 73.050 16.00 70.000 130>130A BASE Proposed25/24 13.18 8.357 0.003 13.18 72.692 12.87 70.803 130A>130B BASE Proposed25/24 12.82 9.863 0.985 12.87 70.803 12.33 70.404 131>130 BASE Proposed25/24 12.31 6.457 0.041 12.76 72.907 13.18 72.692 3E>130A BASE Proposed25/24 12.08 3.816 -0.119 12.75 70.821 12.87 70.803 68>LDSump BASE Proposed25/24 12.26 231.484 13.736 12.26 53.878 12.27 47.536 70>68 BASE Proposed25/24 12.26 225.439 -16.088 12.26 59.774 12.26 53.878 73>70 BASE Proposed25/24 12.30 123.664 15.002 12.27 63.447 12.26 59.774 76>73 BASE Proposed25/24 11.98 127.211 20.138 12.27 67.033 12.27 63.447 BR1>LD3 BASE Proposed25/24 13.82 48.376 3.702 12.27 69.216 12.28 69.223 BR2>BR1 BASE Proposed25/24 15.80 43.865 -9.507 12.28 68.733 12.27 69.216 LD3>76 BASE Proposed25/24 12.80 72.289 -2.014 12.28 69.223 12.27 67.033 LDSump>ChB BASE Proposed25/24 12.27 231.413 0.144 12.27 47.536 0.00 45.000 P110>105 BASE Proposed25/24 12.32 5.964 0.398 12.62 74.320 12.67 74.209 SpreadSwale>130 BASE Proposed25/24 19.27 3.986 -0.950 12.31 70.313 12.33 70.404 SpreadSwale>LD3 BASE Proposed25/24 12.31 20.390 0.033 12.31 70.313 12.28 69.223 StM>SpreadSwale BASE Proposed25/24 12.37 11.272 3.482 12.36 71.904 12.31 70.313 StMPond>LD3 BASE Proposed25/24 12.36 18.633 0.017 12.36 71.904 12.28 69.223 VOG>BR2 BASE Proposed25/24 15.81 37.068 4.851 14.25 66.629 12.28 68.733 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 100/24 (12" Rainfall) Hydrology Simulation Input 8-24-05 2:35 pm Name: Proposed100/24 Filename: K:\169\PROJDATA\DRNDATA\ICPR\Proposed100.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 12.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 11.000 30.00 13.000 5.00 24.000 15.00 40.000 30.00 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 Costa Verde (aka Countryside Executive Golf Course) - Post Condition 100/24 (12" Rainfall) Node Max 8-24-05 2:350 pm Max Time Name Group Simulation Stage hrs Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs 100 BASE Proposed100/24 12.87 74.077 75.000 -0.0005 84267 12.08 60.372 12.87 23.448 105 BASE Proposed100/24 12.66 74.626 75.000 -0.0011 7356 12.24 9.683 12.66 8.266 110 BASE Proposed100/24 12.59 74.842 75.000 0.0006 9747 12.08 14.217 12.34 8.144 120 BASE Proposed100/24 12.77 73.708 74.000 0.0007 77606 12.08 89.089 12.77 41.715 130 BASE Proposed100/24 13.33 73.541 73.500 -0.0007 46739 12.08 33.133 14.23 10.118 130A BASE Proposed100/24 12.74 72.481 71.500 0.0054 120 13.04 19.905 12.97 18.276 130B BASE Proposed100/24 12.60 72.414 70.500 0.0050 141 17.18 7.523 11.58 7.384 131 BASE Proposed100/24 12.88 73.801 73.500 -0.0008 11002 12.08 16.391 12.32 7.909 3E(WetlandCYF) BASE Proposed100/24 12.76 72.485 73.000 -0.0007 30364 12.08 9.031 13.04 11.803 68 BASE Proposed100/24 12.25 56.349 47.000 0.0137 206 12.25 270.430 12.25 270.393 70 BASE Proposed100/24 12.25 64.141 51.500 0.0324 177 12.25 262.173 12.25 262.197 73 BASE Proposed100/24 12.26 67.827 61.000 -0.0428 153 12.73 133.326 12.75 133.505 76 BASE Proposed100/24 12.27 71.352 63.000 -0.0279 260 12.88 130.165 12.74 132.891 BR1 BASE Proposed100/24 12.41 72.246 72.000 -0.0304 133 15.90 52.869 16.01 53.134 BR2 BASE Proposed100/24 12.44 71.524 70.000 -0.0143 184 16.79 49.740 16.79 49.743 Cl BASE Proposed100/24 16.00 70.000 72.500 0.0008 0 12.38 51.244 0.00 0.000 C2 BASE Proposed100/24 13.00 71.500 75.000 0.0008 0 12.00 7.418 0.00 0.000 C3 BASE Proposed100/24 13.00 72.000 75.000 0.0009 0 12.70 33.023 0.00 0.000 Channel B BASE Proposed100/24 0.00 45.000 47.000 0.0000 0 12.26 270.359 0.00 0.000 LD3 BASE Proposed100/24 12.49 71.999 70.000 -0.1202 252 12.45 979.091 13.22 81.145 LDSump BASE Proposed100/24 12.26 47.703 47.000 0.0050 6602 12.25 270.393 12.26 270.359 SpreadSwaleBR BASE Proposed100/24 12.46 72.607 70.200 0.0050 16819 12.00 17.897 12.45 834.528 StM BASE Proposed100/24 12.46 72.850 71.200 -0.0012 23384 12.17 44.789 12.46 95.182 VOG BASE Proposed100/24 14.71 68.408 70.000 0.0011 484391 12.17 452.094 16.69 43.319 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. New Port Richey FL Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Pagel oft FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ,F STORM DRAIN TABULATION M Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: REV: PROJECT: Countryside Executive Golf Course FDC PROJECT NO.: 282-02 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: JCC P!O: 612912oos FDC EPN NO.: 169 REV. BY: BAR- DRAINAGE z z CONTROL ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES z RELS AREA (ACRES) U - Z CROWN ELEV. PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 10 YR LOCATION w L LL C= zp z O z FLOWLINE ELEV. OF F U w C= J U Z LL z U p g Fall w N a Initial HGL 10 Year/ 1 Hour UPPER END _ L) n, U. = C= O LLO p Ow O F5 J U. Of < Fall m w U U w a? ?O z mQ wa wv w F ?zLL ZLu ao ?o hE634 MAT O ?a aLL co (n J AREA C U U i= m ? U ow- =) w ? w Moss:;: n= <n U REMARKS STATION DIST S TO 1 EP 72.70 72.67 0.02 18 0.05% 1.38 2.44 k= 0.5 8 EP M 37 0.51 0.75 0.38 15.0 0.4 6.38 0.38 2.44 74.10 71.40 71.20 0.20 RCP 0.54% 4.75 8.39 7 69.90 69.70 :EI:fT1: 0.012 1 EP 72.67 72.62 0.03 24 0.04% 1.54 4.83 k= 0.5 7 EP M 81 0.59 0.65 0.38 15.4 0.9 6.31 0.77 4.83 74.10 71.70 71.50 0.20 RCP 0.25% 3.89 12.21 6 69.70 69.50 0.012 1 EP 72.62 72.58 0.02 24 0.06%0 1.85 5.80 k= 0.5 6 EP M 35 0.27 0.65 0.18 16.3 0.3 6.16 0.94 5.80 74.10 71.50 71.30 0.20 RCP 0.57% 5.91 18.58 5 69.50 69.30 :: 5T 0.012 .. ...... ...... 1 RIM 72.58 72.50 0.04 30 o 0.05/0 2.04 10.01 k= 0.5 5 EP M 80 rEOf? 0.65 0.70 16.6 0.7 6.12 1.64 10.01 74.74 71.30 71.10 0.20 RCP 0.25% 4.54 22.28 4 68.80 68.60 :tl:0. 0.012 ...... 1 EP 72.50 72.41 0.05 30 0.06%0 2.15 10.55 k= 0.5 4 EP M 95 0.18 0.65 0.12 17.3 0.7 6.02 1.75 10.55 74.10 71.10 70.90 0.20 RCP 0.21% 4.16 20.44 3 68.60 68.40 0.012 ::: 777 77777 1 EP 72.41 72.38 0.01 36 0.03/0 1.67 11.83 k= 0.5 3 EP M 36 0.38 0.65 0.25 18.0 0.4 5.91 2.00 11.83 74.10 69.70 69.50 0.20 RCP 0.56% 7.64 54.00 2 66.70 66.50 0.012 1 EP 72.38 72.33 0.03 36 0.03% 1.66 11.73 k= 0.5 2 MH M 121 0.00 0.75 0.00 18.4 1.2 5.86 2.00 11.73 74.10 69.50 69.30 0.17% 4.17 29.46 1 A 66.50 30 : 1 RIM 72.33 30 U 0.02% 1.61 11.41 k= 0.5 1A EP M 38 0.00 0.75 0.00 19.6 0.4 5.70 2.00 11.41 75.50 69.30 t 10 0.53% 7.44 52.56 1 66.30 10 1 EP 72.84 72.75 0.05 18 0.13% 2.36 4.16 k = 0.5 15 EP M 35 0.87 0.75 0.65 15.0 0.2 6.38 0.65 4.16 73.30 71.50 71.30 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 14 70.00 69.80 04:: 0.012 .. ...... ...... 1 EP 72.75 72.57 0.14 24 o 0.09/0 2.41 7.56 k= 0.5 14 EP M 145 0.83 0.65 0.54 15.2 1.0 6.34 1.19 7.56 73.30 69.30 69.10 0.20 RCP 0.14% 2.91 9.13 13 67.30 67.10 ...... :;0:04:: 0.012 ....... ...... 1 EP 72.57 72.44 0.08 24 0.10% 2.50 7.84 k= 0.5 13 EP M 76 rLI2 0.65 0.08 16.3 0.5 6.18 1.27 7.84 73.30 69.10 68.90 0.20 RCP 0.26% 4.01 12.61 12 67.10 66.90 ::Q:05:: 0.012 1 EP 72.44 72.35 0.04 24 0.12% 2.68 8.43 k= 0.5 12 EP M 35 0.15 0.75 0.11 16.8 0.2 6.10 1.38 8.43 73.30 68.90 68.70 0.20 RCP 0.57% 5.91 18.58 11 66.90 66.70 76:Ofi: 0.012 7777 T777 1 EP 72.35 72.30 0.02 30 0.04% 1.91 9.38 k= 0.5 11 EP M 43 0.22 0.75 0.17 17.0 0.4 6.06 1.55 9.38 73.30 68.70 68.50 0.20 RCP 0.47% 6.19 30.39 10 66.20 66.00 0.012 stormtabCEGC.xls, 10:19 PM Page 1 of 7 - - FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. i. Jh 3 STORM DRAIN TABULATION FORM ..T__ Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: REV: PROJECT: Countryside Executive Golf Course FDC PROJECT NO.: 282-02 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: JCC vnn• anonnns FDC FPN NO • 169 REV RY-- BAR- DRAINAGE z z CONTROL ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES z RELS AREA (ACRES) 0 3 z CROWN ELEV. PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 10 YR LOCATION ? ? C= j 0 2 O :E z FLOWLINE ELEV. U OF F „- F w LL = C= _ F U Z LL Z F U O 0 Fall N o Initial HGL 10 Year/ 1 Hour UPPER END w o LL (9 C= - F O O N' J LL LL ¢^ Fall y w U (L ?O Z 7 ¢ 2< z F C MAT o 0 F- w ? MW F_ O O?L` O_jw a z pZ ea : wLL ¢v -' 0 P H H ? F- w U v w . w , u) > U v STATION DIST S TO AREA C n= I REMARKS 1 EP 72.64 72.61 0.02 14X23 0.05% 1.36 2.44 k= 0.5 22 EP M 38 0.51 0.75 0.38 15.0 0.5 6.38 0.38 2.44 74.10 71.67 71.47 0.20 ERCP 0.53% 4.57 8.22 21 ....... 70.50 70.30 ::0 0.012 ...... ......... ....... 1 EP 72.61 72.30 0.26 18 0.16/° 2.60 4.59 k= 0.5 21 EP M 160 0.46 0.75 0.35 15.5 1.0 6.30 0.73 4.59 74.10 71.50 71.20 0.30 RCP 0.19% 2.80 4.94 20 70.00 69.70 0.012 1 EP 71.91 71.90 0.00 18 0.00% 0.43 0.77 k= 0.5 32 EP M 65 0.16 0.75 0.12 15.0 2.5 6.38 0.12 0.77 73.67 71.90 71.70 0.20 RCP 0.31% 3.58 6.33 31 70.40 70.20 0.012 ...... ...... 1 EP 71.90 71.84 0.04 24 0.04 /0 1.52 4.76 k= 0.5 31 EP M 115 0.61 0.75 0.46 17.5 1.3 5.99 0.80 4.76 73.29 72.20 71.50 0.70 RCP 0.61% 6.10 19.17 30 70.20 69.50 0.012 . ...•... ..•.... EP 71.84 71:36 0.35 24 0 0.28 /0 4.15 13.04 k= 0.5 30 EP rM 125 0.39 0.75 0.29 18.8 0.5 5.81 1.65 13.04 73.29 71.50 71.30 0.20 RCP 0.16% 3.13 9.83 69.50 69.30 0.012 . ...... ........ 1 EP 71.36 71.14 0.16 30 o 0.09/ 2.66 13.08 k= 0.5 29 EP M 185 0.23 0.75 0.17 19.3 1.2 5.74 2.28 13.08 72.98 71.30 71.10 0.20 RCP 0.11% 2.98 14.65 28 68.80 68.60 :::0:'66.:: 0.012 1 EP 71.14 70.90 0.15 30 0.14% 3.38 16.61 k= 0.5 28 EP M 110 0.58 0.75 0.44 20.4 0.5 5.60 2.97 16.61 73.20 71.10 70.90 0.20 RCP 0.18% 3.87 19.00 27 68.60 68.40 A:09.: 0.012 1 EP 70.80 70.68 0.05 36 0.09% 2.99 21.16 k= 0.5 27 EP M 59 0.17 0.75 0.13 21.0 0.3 5.54 3.82 21.16 73.20 69.90 69.70 0.20 RCP 0.34% 5.97 42.18 26 66.90 66.70 :OOi 0.012 ....... .......... 1 EP 70.68 70.60 0.03 42 0.05/ 2.50 24.06 DLW Pond 120 = 70.4 k= 0.5 26 EP M 56 0.33 0.75 0.25 21.3 0.4 5.50 4.38 24.06 73.20 69.70 69.50 0.20 RCP 0.360X 6.79 65.31 25 66.20 66.00 0.012 NWL Pond 120 = 69.5 1 EP 71.20 71.20 0.00 18 0.00% 0.33 0.57 k= 0.5 37 EP M 35 0.12 0.75 0.09 15.0 1.8 6.38 0.09 0.57 73.45 70.95 70.75 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 36 69.45 69.25 : O:QQ : 0.012 ::: 1 EP 71.20 71.14 0.05 18 0.04%0 1.24 2.19 k= 0.5 36 EP M 130 0.36 0.75 0.27 16.8 1.7 6.09 0.36 2.19 73.20 70.75 70.10 0.65 RCP 0.50% 4.57 8.07 35 69.25 68.60 :O;0: 0.012 1 EP 71.14 70.80 0.30 18 0.14/ 2.40 4.25 k= 0.5 35 EP M 215 0.17 0.75 0.13 18.5 1.5 5.84 0.73 4.25 73.20 69.60 69.20 0.40 RCP 0.19% 2.79 4.92 27 68.10 67.70 ::0:04:: 0.012 stormtabCEGC.xls, 10:19 PM Page 2 of 7 rl rr rr . ri ¦r rr rr . rr r r¦I? FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. STORM DRAIN TABULATION FORM Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: REV: P/O: 6/29/2005 PROJECT: Countryside Executive Golf Course FDC PROJECT NO.: 282-02 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: JCC FDC EPN NO.: 169 REV. BY: BAR- DRAINAGE z z CONTROL ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES z RELS AREA (ACRES) v -> 3 Z CROWN ELEV. PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 10 YR LOCATION w LL C= Oz O Z FLOWLINE ELEV. U OF D LL Z) LU = C= F LL Z Z v OJ O Fall N o Initial HGL 10 Year/ 1 Hour UPPER END O O O w ? F- C= O O OLL LL ¢^ Fall w ? 0..of O z m^ w~ w~ w ¢ ¢On zW,w w 2 w MAT o O? ¢in p z O O U LL - z p w M 4 O ? LL 0 U. STATION DIST S U) F U) - TO J AREA C (0 V F- U) L) III REMARKS 1 EP 71.15 71.14 0.01 18 0.02% 0.87 1.53 k= 0.5 43 EP M 1 35 0.32 0.75 1 0.24 15.0 0.7 6.38 0.24 1.53 73.20 70.30 70.10 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 35 68.80 68.60 1::;0:0:1 0.012 1 EP 71.16 71.14 0.01 18 0.02% 0.92 1.63 k= 0.5 38 EP M 35 0.34 0.75 0.26 15.0 0.6 6.38 0.26 1.63 73.20 71.30 71.10 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 28 69.80 1 69.60 :0:01:: j:: 0.012 1 EP 71.40 71.36 0.03 18 0.07% 1.65 2.92 k= 0.5 39 EP M 40 0.29 0.75 0.22 15.0 0.4 6.38 0.46 2.92 73.29 71.50 71.30 0.20 RCP 0.50% 4.57 8:07 29 70.00 69.80 402: 0.012 1 GE 71.94 71.90 0.02 18 0.03% 1.13 1.99 k= 0.5 41 Grate M 72 0.78 0.40 0.31 15.0 1.1 6.38 0.31 1.99 74.20 71.90 71.70 0.20 RCP 0.28% 3.40 6.01 40 70.40 70.20 :'O;01 i 0.012 1 EP 71.90 71.84 0.03 18 0.09% 1.96 3.47 k= 0.5 40 EP M 35 0.33 0.75 0.25 16.1 0.3 6.21 0.56 3.47 73.20 71.70 71.50 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 30 70.20 70.00 0.012 1 EP 71.91 71.90 0.01 18 0.01% 0.79 1.39 k= 0.5 42 EP M 35 0.29 0.75 0.22 15.0 0.7 6.38 0.22 1.39 72.74 71.90 71.70 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 31 ::: 70.40 70.20 :0:00.: 0.012 :: 1 EP 70.64 70.63 0.01 18 0.02% 0.84 1.48 k= 0.5 47 EP M 35 0.31 0.75 0.23 15.0 0.7 6.38 0.23 1.48 73.20 69.90 69.70 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 46 68.40 68.20 :01:: 0.012 1 EP 70.63 70.60 0.02 18 0.03% 1.09 1.93 k= 0.5 46 EP M 59 0.10 0.75 0.08 15.7 0.9 6.27 0.31 1.93 73.20 69.70 69.30 0.40 RCP 0.68% 5.32 9.40 26 68.20 67.80 0.012 stormtabCEGC.xIs, 10:19 PM Page 3 of 7 M = = = wk... FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. STORM DRAIN TABULATION FORM _ Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: REV: PROJECT: Countryside Executive Golf Course FDC PROJECT NO.: 282-02 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: JCC P/O: 6/29/2005 FDC EPN NO.: 169 REV. BY: BAR- DRAINAGE z z CONTROL ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES Z RELS AREA (ACRES) U Z CROWN ELEV. PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 10 YR LOCATION ? w C= zO OJ g Z FLOWLINE ELEV. OF F LL ? w = C= F v Z Z v r O Fall w N o Initial HGL 10 Year/ 1 Hour UPPER END W? a LL ? C= p 0 O U. ¢ ^ Fall w a ~ O w ?v ?? ?w F p p?LL Ow ? az pz 1Ee2C:. MAT O wLL av STATION DIST S v i TO AREA C cl) P F- p 0 z F ?- ? ?? U w - D w 169 : = u) > ? 2 n REMARKS 1 EP 70.98 70.93 0.02 18 0.06% 1.63 2.87 k= 0.5 53 EP M 35 0.60 0.75 0.45 15.0 0.4 6.38 0.45 2.87 73.20 70.20 70.00 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 52 68.70 68.50 ::0;02:: 0.012 1 EP 70.93 70.66 0.22 18 0.14% 2.44 4.31 k= 0.5 52 EP M 155 0.31 0.75 0.23 15.4 1.1 6.32 0.68 4.31 73.20 70.00 69.70 0.30 RCP 0.19% 2.84 5.02 51 68.50 68.20 ::0:05:: 0.012 EP 70.66 70.60 0.02 24 0.09% 2.35 7.38 DLW Pond 120 = 70.4 k= 0.5 51 EP M 24 0.16 0.75 0.12 16.4 0.2 6.15 1.00 7.38 73.20 9.70 6950 0.20 RP 0.83% 7.14 22.43 5O 67.70 67.50 ::0:04-:: 0.012 NWL Pond 120 = 69.5 1 EP 70.67 70.66 0.00 18 0.01% 0.70 1.24 k= 0 5 54 EP S 35 0.26 0.75 0.20 15.0 0.8 6.38 0.20 1.24 73.20 70.20 70.00 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 . 51 68.70 68.50 ::0:0(1: 0.012 :: 1 EP 72.57 72.41 0.09 18 0.22% 3.03 5.36 k= 0 5 62 EP M 42 1.12 0.75 0.84 15.0 0.2 6.38 0.84 5.36 74.78 70.40 70.20 0.20 RCP 0.48% 4.46 7.87 . 61 68.90 68.70 0.012 1 EP 72.41 72.18 0.16 24 0.14%0 2.91 9.13 k= 0 5 61 EP M 115 rE37: 0.75 0.28 15.2 0.7 6.34 1.44 9.13 74.78 70.20 70.00 0.20 RCP 0.17% 3.26 10.25 . 67 68.20 68.00 ::0:0,7::: 0.012 : 7777= 777 1 EP 72.18 71.58 0.42 24 0.40% 4.96 15.57 k= 0 5 67 MH M 104 0.77 0.75 0.58 15.2 0.3 6.34 2.13 15.57 73.98 70.00 69.70 0.30 RCP 0.29% 4.20 13.20 . 65 68.00 67.70 Q:11: 0.012 `777 777 - 1 EP 71.58 71.32 0.17 30 0.13% 3.28 16.10 k= 0 5 65 MH M 133 0.55 0.75 0.41 15.9 0.7 6.23 1.85 16.10 73.00 69.70 69.50 0.20 RCP 0.15% 3.52 17.28 . 58A 67.20 67.00 d;08: 0.012 1 RIM 71.32 71.12 0.15 30 0.09% 2.73 13.42 k= 0 5 58A MH M 160 0.45 0.75 0.34 16.6 1.0 6.13 2.19 13.42 74.20 69.50 69.30 0.20 RCP 0.13% 3.21 15.75 . 58 67.00 66.80 VG.6.1 0.012 : 1 RIM 71.12 70.93 0.11 36 0.09%0 3.14 22.20 k= 0 5 58 MH M 118 0.62 0.75 0.47 16.6 0.6 6.13 2.96 22.20 73.84 68.00 67.80 0.20 RCP 0.17% 4.22 29.83 . 57 65.00 64.80 d6: 0.012 1 GE 70.93 70.72 0.15 36 0.06% 2.61 18.45 k= 0 5 57 Grate t 239 0.24 0.40 0.10 17.2 1.5 6.03 3.06 18.45 73.00 67.80 67.56 0.24 RCP 0.10% 3.25 22.96 . 56 64.80 64.56 0.012 1 GE 70.72 70.60 0.07 36 0.07% 2.64 18.63 DLW Pond 120 = 70 40 k= 0 5 56 Grate M 100 0.36 0.40 0.14 18.7 0.6 5.82 3.20 18.63 73.50 67.56 67.36 0.20 RCP 0.20% 4.58 32.40 . . 55 64.56 64.36 d,d5 0.012 NWL Pond 120 = 69.50 stormtabCEGC.xls, 10:19 PM Page 4 of 7 ?- FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. STORM DRAIN TABULATION FORM Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: REV: PROJECT: Countryside Executive Golf Course FDC PROJECT NO.: 282-02 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: JCC oin• c?nnnna Fnr` FPN Nn • 169 RFV. RY, BAR- DRAINAGE z z CONTROL ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES z RELS AREA (ACRES) v > Z CROWN ELEV. PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 10 YR LOCATION w C= J Z0 2 O? FLOWLINE ELEV. OF F w LL F w LL C= t¢- O LL z F v Z O J a ll w N e nitial HGL 10 Year/ 1 Hour UPPER END 0 O? o LL = C= OF Z i 0 p 2 _ F U_ of Q Fall w U L) aF ?O w ?: 9? 2W F- O O?LL O?w i ?o MAT O oLL a LL? ' ~ ? r v O w w o N ?' c STATION DIST S TO ::l ng:;: n= REMARKS 1 EP 71.24 71.22 0.01 18 0.03% 1.03 1.82 k= 0.5 64 EP S 37 0.38 0.75 0.29 15.0 0.6 6.38 0.29 1.82 73.00 70.60 70.40 0.20 RCP 0.54% 4.75 8.39 63 69.10 68.90 ::0:01::: 0.012 1 EP 71.22 71.12 0.06 18 0.13% 2.29 4.05 DLW Pond 120 - 70.40 k= 0.5 - 63 EP S 50 0.48 0.75 0.36 15.6 0.4 6.28 0.65 4.05 73.00 70.40 70.20 0.20 RCP 0.40% 4.08 7.22 58 68.90 68.70 : Q:(3q: 0.012 NWL Pond 120 = 69.50 1 EP 72.53 72.18 0.24 15 0.42% 3.71 4.55 k= 0.5 66 EP S 58 0.95 0.75 0.71 15.0 0.3 6.38 0.71 4.55 73.37 71.65 71.45 0.20 RCP 0.34°/ 3.36 4.12 65 70.40 70.20 ::(3;1:1::: 0.012 1 EP 72.43 72.41 0.01 18 0.03% 1.16 2.06 k= 0.5 67 EP W 35 0.43 0.75 0.32 15.0 0.5 6.38 0.32 2.06 73.98 69.70 69.50 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 0 68.20 68.00 ;0 01 : 0.012 1 EP 72.26 72.20 0.03 24 0.08% 2.27 7.12 k= 0.5 75 EP M 35 0.75 15.0 0.3 6.38 7.12 73.50 70.90 70.70 0.20 RCP 0.57% 5.91 18.58 74 68.90 68.70 0.012 ...... ...... 1 EP 72.20 72.06 0.09 24 0.08% 2.27 7.12 k= 0.5 74 EP M 109 0.00 0.75 0.00 15.3 0.8 6.34 0.00 7.12 72.95 70.70 70.50 0.20 RCP 0.18% 3.35 10.53 73 ......... 68.70 68.50 ..... ::0:04:: 0.012 ... ............ ........... 1 EP 72.06 71.43 0.50 24 o 0.27/ 4.10 12.88 k= 0.5 73 EP M 182 0.38 0.75 0.29 16.1 0.7 6.21 0.69 12.88 72.95 70.50 70.00 0.50 RCP 0.27% 4.10 12.88 72 68.50 68.00 :Q33: 0.012 . ...... ..... 1 RIM 71.43 71.33 0.06 30 0.06% 2.31 11.32 k= 0.5 72 MH M 96 0.00 0.40 0.00 16.8 0.7 6.09 0.69 11.32 73.50 70.00 69.80 0.20 RCP 0.21% 4.14 20.34 71 67.50 67.30 0.012 1 EP 71.33 71.20 0.06 30 0.10% 2.94 14.41 DLW Pond 131 = k= 0.5 71 EP M 60 0.39 0.40 0.16 17.5 0.3 5.99 1.03 14.41 72.95 69.80 69.60 0.20 RCP 0.33% 5.24 25.72 70 67.30 67.10 : Q:6r 0.012 NWL Pond 131 = 1 1 1 1 I EP 71.34 71.33 0.00 18 0.01% 0.65 1.15 k= 0.5 76 EP S 35 0.24 0.75 0.18 15.0 0.9 6.38 ? 0.18 1.15 72.95 70.30 69.80 0.50 RCP 1.43% 7.72 13.64 71 68.80 68.30 [A; : 0.012 stormtabCEGC.xls, 10:19 PM Page 5 of 7 7L, FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. V STORM DRAIN TABULATION FORM Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: REV: PROJECT: Countryside Executive Golf Course FDC PROJECT NO.: 282-02 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: JCC P/O' 6/29/2nn5 Fnn FPN No • 1R9 RFV RV• BAR- DRAINAGE z z CONTROL ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES Z RELS AREA (ACRES) v --, ?: z CROWN ELEV. PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 10 YR LOCATION LL C= -, 0 2 O 2 z FLOWLINE ELEV. w OF r LL F w = C= F L) Z Z it V O Fall N o Initial HGL 10 Year/ 1 Hour UPPER END j W j > a C= p U. O z U. LL Q- r Fall w v ao O z m wP w? a Qp >w w w MAT Q. o^ a^ L O p v 0 D w O w 4 O > (L < LL STATION DIST S U) ~U) TO -' AREA C v i- N ? r w REMARKS 1 EP 72.10 172.06 0.02 18 0.05% 1.46 2.59 k= 0.5 77 EP S ? 35 0.54 0.75 0.41 15.0 0.4 6.38 0.41 2.59 72.95 70.70 70.50 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 7 3 ....... I 69.20 69.00 :p02: : t 0.012 1 EP 71.27 71.27 0.00 14X23 0.00% 0.43 0.77 k= 0.5 87 EP S 35 0.16 0.75 0.12 15.0 1.4 6.38 0.12 0.77 72.95 70.67 70.47 0.20 ERCP 0.57% 4.76 8.57 86 69.50 69.30 :(1:EFa: 0.012 ... ............ ...... 1 EP 71.27 71.20 0.05 14X23 o 0.05% 1.36 2.45 OLW Pond 130 = 71.00 k= 0.5 86 EP S 110 0.37 0.75 0.28 16.4 1.3 6.16 0.40 2.45 72.95 70.47 70.27 0.20 ERCP 0.18% 2.68 4.83 85 69.30 69.70 :::Q01 : 0.012 NWL Pond 130 = 70.30 1 EP 71.27 71.27 0.00 18 0.00% 0.35 0.62 k= 0.5 92 EP S 35 0.13 0.75 0.10 15.0 1.7 6.38 0.10 0.62 72.95 70.70 70.50 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 91 69.20. 69.00 :E1:fiR 0.012 1 EP 71.27 71.20 0.05 18 0.04% 1.35 2.38 DLW Pond 130 = 71.00 k= 0.5 91 EP S 118 0.39 0.75 0.29 16.7 1.5 6.11 0.39 2.38 72.95 67.20 67.00 0.20 RCP 0.17% 2.66 4.70 90 65.70 65.50 t)E29: 0.012 ::: NWL Pond 130 = 70.30 1 EP 71.28 71.27 0.01 18 0.02% 0.84 1.48 k= 0.5 77 EP S 35 0.31 0.75 0.23 15.0 0.7 638 0.23 1.48 72.95 70.70 70.50 0.20 RCP 0.57% 4.88 8.63 73 69.20 69.00 0.012 1 EP 71.50 71.50 0.00 24 0.00% 0.52 1.63 k= 0 5 74C MH M 35 0.64 0.40 0.26 15.0 1.1 6.38 0.26 1.63 73.00 71.70 71.50 0.20 RCP 0.57% 5.91 18.58 . 74B 69.70 69.50 :fJ EEf. 0.012 1 EP 71.24 71.20 0.01 24 0.05% 1.72 5.40 k= 0 5 74B EP M 30 0.34 0.40 0.14 16.1 0.3 6.20 0.87 5.40 73.00 71.00 70.80 0.20 RCP 0.67% 6.39 20.06 . 74A 777777 69.00 68.80 : q:(} 0.012 : : 1 EP 72.77 72.72 0.03 18 0.07% 1.73 3.06 k= 0 5 113 EP M 38 0.64 0.75 0.48 15.0 0.4 6.38 0.48 3.06 74.71 72.00 71.80 0.20 RCP 0.53% 4.68 8.28 . 112 70.50 70.30 :E 624: 0.012 1 EP 72.72 72.62 0.06 18 0.12% 2.25 3.98 k= 0 5 112 EP M 48 0.20 0.75 0.15 15.4 0.4 6.32 0.63 3.98 74.71 71.80 71.60 0.20 RCP 0.42% 4.17 7.37 . 111 70.30 70.10 10:04 0.012 1 RIM 72.62 71.40 0.76 24 0.98% 7.75 24.34 k= 0 5 111 EP M 77 0.46 0.75 0.35 15.7 0.2 6.26 1.46 24.34 74.50 71.60 71.40 0.20 RCP 0.26% 3.99 12.52 . 110 69.60 69.40 1 :;A47-:1 0.012 stormtabCEGC.xls, 10:19 PM Page 6 of 7 -- FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. STORM DRAIN TABULATION FORM Per F.D.O.T. Drainage Manual, Volume 2, Figure 10-11 DATE: REV: PROJECT: Countryside Executive Golf Course FDC PROJECT NO.: 282-02 COUNTY: Pinellas BY: JCC P/O' 6/2912005 FnC FPN NO' 169 RFV RY• BAR- DRAINAGE Z CONTROL ELEV. OF H.G. HYDRAULIC NOTES z RELS AREA (ACRES) cwJ K Z CROWN ELEV. PHYSICAL ZONE 6 -FREQUENCY 10 YR LOCATION LL C= zz z O z FLOWLINE ELEV. w OF F U_ F uj = C= F V Z Z v - O Fall N o Initial HGL 10 Year/ 1 Hour UPPER ENO L) W U (L U. F- C= OF p 0 0 0 v) .j LL ?¢^ m Fall w L n ?O z m^ w~ w~ w ¢ QOin z z>w w w MAT a 06 ay a z O U_ O w 0 L 0 d . STATION DIST S N ~? TO -' AREA C m y t- LL w w w LL R M RK A E S 1 EP 72.09 71.76 0.15 24 0.38% 4.85 15.23 k= 0.5 109 EP M 38 0.64 0.75 0.48 15.0 0.1 6.38 0.48 15.23 75.09 72.00 71.34 0.66 RCP 1.74% 10.31 32.39 108 70.00 69.34 ::0:1.8:: 0.012 1 EP 71.76 71.39 0.16 24 0.43% 5.15 16.18 k= 0.5 108 EP M 38 0.20 0.75 0.15 15.1 0.1 6.36 0.63 16.18 75.09 71.34 71.26 0.08 RCP 0.21% 3.59 11.28 107 69.34 69.26 ::02 0.012 .. .. ...... ........ ...... ......... RIM 71.39 71.21 0.06 24 o 0.25/0 3.87 12.17 k= 0.5 107 EP N 26 0.46 0.75 0.35 15.3 0.1 6.34 #REF! 12.17 74.50 71.26 7.21 0.0 RCP 0.19% 3.43 10.78 1O 69.26 69.21 0.012 1 EP 71.23 71.23 0.00 14X23 0.00% 0.43 0.77 k= 0.5 10C EP S 35 0.16 0.75 0.12 15.0 1.4 6.38 0.12 0.77 73.73 68.67 68.47 0.20 ERCP 0.57% 4.76 8.57 10B 67.50 67.30 ' 00: 0.012 .. ...... ...... 1 EP 71.23 71.20 0.02 14X23 o 0.05/ 1.36 2.45 k= 0.5 10B EP S 37 0.37 0.75 0.28 16.4 0.5 6.16 0.40 2.45 73.73 68.47 68.27 0.20 ERCP 0.54% 4.63 8.33 3®C" 67.30 67.10 A: 0.012 /off stormtabCEGC.xis, 10:19 PM Page 7 of 7 ? ?•ry:lilo: ?99?9TERE??,' CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 o? eL ?a U.S. POSTAGE LUC* L!45' H METER 717335 r w ?a w CQ jwQ ? CC 0 =C7vui Z z P4A ?- r ? 4. ? ROSSI, CARL A ROSSI, IRMA A 2550 ROYAL PINES CIR # 12B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1122 ROSS550 337633301 IN 50 09/29/05 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE 70 FORWARD ??1.?)?etfir??;•fa al?3atS.?`;all????.t+a?t?.l?!1?J(1 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEMKIMNT POST OFI:[CE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 Y U.S. POSTAGE ?a 9 : ;.•c !Tyr S'ief i ?r }- }-Gf =r R k W '{', ?4J"_?i•% t O ,'92 a? A LAURELWOOD CONDO 1 ASSN W 2460 LAURELWOOD DR Lo I o ' CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1527 w to y r- Iw>?! Z C, I' o U) Wu a.. ......,4E ?..._ l-,lillIII, III#I IJ-1.11 11-1111 If- pill 1.1 111 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPAmmNT '9WATEREe? POST OITICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 PLAN & -LOPt, NT t}} SERVICES 1 Cr- CLEARWAZ' .? °C Al P A.9 U.S. POSTAGE FQ I - i r o y i p - ?, O L jf ??.L V k?'C'?S_t t}•i •Tr ,.'•Y' ,tY.''.;L trt ,.'• tr' _ JC:I. 15'( 2 1? 3.-tt- off at'' F L H METER 717335 VERCAIGNIE, LUCIEN A VERCAIGNIE, LEA M 2494 LAURELWOOD DR # 1-B CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1533 VERG494 33763:.x90 IN 48 0v/20105 RETURN -0 SENDER. NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER i!l11stlliEitttlt?lItlllitilliiftll?tilil?tl7!!llill F ' t?a 4 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER r;. A5. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ..... ?POST ONCE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 337558-4748 SEP 2 6 2005 PLANNING & f'+riELGt ?•"ENT i SERVICES r EARWA"' ?? ._. U.S. POSTAGE s Mal r ^0 0,2 9 d r` H METER 717335 a VILLAGE GREEN REC ASSN INC I COUNTRYSIDE BLVD STE 300 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - ^'3 '; .". ':,} ? `+',:?? .°-S ??_rs.=: ?rr?lrss/lrlers)rirlrTrrlsr?tr?t CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DERUMMNT POST ONCE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 RECEH SEP 2 6 2005 i pLANNING & 1,I-VELOP%*ENT f SERVICES Cf. r.ARWA- P M A W? .q U.S. POSTAGE ?. a SE? 15-05 i 1 2 O R Y ITEM F V F 1. H METER 717335 COUNTRYSIDE TWO CONDO ASSN 2555 ENTERPRISE RD CLEARWATER FL 00000 - CITY OF CLEARWATER 01) W? p M A9 U.S. POSTAGE #) PLANNmG DEPARTMENT acs pp[P r ,gTEP,vqPOST OFTICE Box 4748 "`..Y T'•. "':' r _ ,-.iln'-- : wtp$•a 3 _ _ =, •`• o U?? 9 2 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 Ic L H METER 717335 .' I 1 SEP 2 6 20) 1 ! PLANNING & SERVICES C17ynG SU, CHARLES S U, MARGARITA 2531 ROYAL PINES CIR # 23-H CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1115 5U--531 337631290 IN 48 Oc7/20l05 RETURN TO SENDER NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE UNABLE TO FORWARD RETURN TO SENDER t._w`_,:i.••i? i,•fs'^? :r?,' y'u„•.?:.;Qa .'t••'r'? ita7i!!£fillltli£itilllf3lt!!li££Ei!!£lIFI££!lldii! ?'''?,,, •'`c%l?: CITY OF CLEARWATER CEO P??A '? 19 U.S. POSTAGE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9 ' s i SEP1I!? 1 O U z 7ERPOST OFFICE Box 4748` -irn ;.: F' t auic?3?= t-.* 0n CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 aLL F L N METER 717335 SHIMEK, DAVID F SHIMEIC, RUTH A 2561 ROYAL PINE CIR # 14-A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1125 E_..',f..:ts:::•7•.jl?., '!'%'?'"_'3•?-':`:r.^'?r ?"..' 1lli?l Fl?ll?titlliiI sill IIIII III ttl ititt?ise it??e?{? CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT °9!?gTEpE? POST OFFICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 ?a U.S. POSTAGE r crui oco GL PF7URM 00.292 H METER 77335 VILLAGE ON THE GREEN CONDO ASS ?? ?`aSALAURE-L?-98D-DIZ CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1270 21? CITY OF CLEARWATER = e' PLANNING DEEAnaNT 99A7EF,II POST 0I`ICE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 to M wQ f P ..p .9 U.S. POSTAGE C)o Erl' a= O 0.2 F L 11 METER 77335 DAR-AS, ANTONIO DARAS, NIKI 2452 LAURELWOOD DR # A CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 1500 j-_y. _ ...•_y... " ??""r :` z?? lrrlisar?lllts!?r{r?fi!rltrla!ii!rfir!!IIis1Fr!i:all CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' g7ER? •'POST OMCE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 CC* P M A ov 9 LU? SE?15'05 a? ? r . \ I n SEP 1 J 2uG? ?.. SERVICESOpN!ENT C17y OF CLE CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 3378 - 4745 U.S• POVAGE j. 00,29? x li METER 717335 k ?,:?=?.•-???t••?tt••i- ?•?•?-?? f ii ft f` i i i I i i it f i if t.ri...ti:.t.t?t..r ?.:••.« .Y-.°?$ sa ara a rra a. a t ar -mar rir r rr re V-11 Alf)- N?