The URL can be used to link to this page

FLS2007-080410 `Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 10 CASE #: /-"4s oZ OD !J SO ?? RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ ** RE-SUBMITTAL TO ROBERT TEFFT ** * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project - Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: STEVE . . . . . . . . . ............ . . . . . . . . . . 1.1- ............. & KIELY ALLEN ......................... . ..................................................... . ................................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... . . . . . MAILING ADDRESS: 410.3..__. MA.GN.OLIA....._DRIVE_..........CLEARWATER........... PHONE NUMBER: (727) 447-1171 FAX NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: 727 4.4Q-3844 EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . ........... KIELY ...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................. . . . . . ...................................... ALLEN List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: J..W. SMITH DESIGN GROUP, LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 35095 U. S. HWY 19 NORTH, SUITE _. ITE 101. PALM HARBOR, FL 34684 ................................... .......................... .. ............................................................... ............._.......................................................................... .................... ...................._-".................._............................ _.................... . PHONE NUMBER: (727) 785_-4441 FAX NUMBER: 7271 789-6275 _ CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: roqer@lwsmibhde.aiqn.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: ......Allen......_Res_iden c .e ...................................................................... PROJECT VALUATION: 5 .............. ... .. ...._$.._.0.0..,.0.0....0....._00................................ STREET ADDRESS 403 MAGNOLIA DRIVE, CLE_ARWA_TE_R, FL 3375_6_ PARCEL NUMBER(S): PART OF ^LOT 82 AND ALL OF LOTS 84 AND 86 . . . ........................ . .................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . .......................................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................. . . PARCEL SIZE (acres): 0....._5.4......_ACRE_5 .................................. ................................... ............................. ..... PARCEL SIZE (square feet): .......2.3...s._3.9.9........5._-._f..,................................ .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: _ THE WEST 25.00 FEET OF LOT 82 AND ALL OF LOT 84 AND LOT 86, CORRECTED MAP OF HARBOR OAKS, AS RECQRDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............... . ..................... . . . . . . ... . . . . . ............................ . . . . . .................... . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . ................ . ............................ . . . . . . . ......................................... . PROPOSED USE(S): 56 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 2-STORY ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED Specifically identify the request DWELLING WITH A 20'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK. WILL KEEP THE PROPOSED (include number of units or square , footage of non-residential use and all STRUCTURE IN LINE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY AT 415 MAGNOLIA requested code deviations; e.g. WHICH WAS THEIR HOME, AND PRIVACY WALL 20' -0" FROM FRONT reduction in required number of PROPERTY-LINE, AS W -ELZ AS? 31'4-fi?-32 Z-MAGNOLr?(-PHO-TOS---ATTAC= . parking spaces, specific use, etc.) . A 'VARTANCE WAS GRANTRn TN MARCH 9nni FnP THF. gAMF. nTSTANCT C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page I of 8 • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. THE PROPOSED 2-STORY ADDITION IS THE SAME ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AS THE EXIST RESIDENCE, WHICH IS ONE OF THE OLDEST±IN HARBOR OAKS. THE ADDITION AND EXISTING RESIDENCE COMBINED COVER ONLY 30$ OF THE PROPERTY. ALSO, HOMES LOCATED AT 314,,322 & 4.15.......MAGNOLI.A......DR.IVE.......A.RE......LOCATE.D......2 .0.1 ._--0_f!........F.ROM FRONT PROPERTY ..LINE- WHICH _WILL. KEEP IT IN HARMONY WITH THE COMMUNITY. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. THE PROPOSED ADDITION, AS WELL AS ADDING A GARAGE TO THE PROPERTY WHICH IS CURRENTLY WITHOUT ONE, WILL INCREASE THE VALUE OF THE PRESENT DWELLING, TH-EREaY- INCREASING-THEmmVII UE-OF"tTHE-SURROUNDING-RESIDENCE . 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL NOT HAVE ANY ADVERSE AFFECT ON THE PERSONS RESIDING OR WORKING IN T1 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. EXCEPT FOR A CIRCULAR DRIVEWAY, THERE IS PRESENTLY NO OFF-STREET PARKING FOR THE OWNER'S VEHICLES. THE PROPOSED GARAGE AND DRIVE ADDITION WOCJLD MINIMIZE ON-STREET PARKING FOR THE RESIDENCE, AS WELL AS ALLOWING ....-A......SIDE......EN_TZ3Y......_TO.......T.HE.......GARAGE .......AN.D.......W.I.L.L......H.E.LP.......S.H..I-ELD.......THE. ......BIG GARAGE.......DOO.R.. ...... ..... ................ 5. ......................................... ................................... -..................................... ...................................................................................................................... .................. .......... _........................................ ......................... ............... .... ..... .... .............. ................ ....................... _........... The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. . THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR AT 415 MAGNOLIA HAS A 6'-0" HIGH PRIVACY WALL AND THE FRONT OF THE HOME IS AT 20' -0" FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE, AS WELL AS 314 & 322 MAGNOLIA,.. ..............304.......MAGNOLIA.. HAS. A PRIVACY_.WALL- 5' -0" HIGH AND COLUMNS _ THAT . .....ARE HIGHER, THAT IS 15'-0" FROM FRONT PROPERTY LINE. WE FEEL THIS VARIANCE IS CONSISTENT WITH . . . . .............................................................. ................. .... .. ... . THE EXISTING COMMUNITY. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. THE.-APPROVAL-OF .......THE......NEW...... CARRIAGE .......H.OUS.E......HAS.......N.O.....-ADVERSE ......AFFECT.-OR-NEGATIVE .......I.MP.AC.T........_.. ON THE SURROUNDING AREAS. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................... . . . . . . . . . . . .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................... ................................................................................................. _._..................................... ......................... ........... .................................... ............. ........................... ....................... ........................................... .............................. -............................................................................................................ ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 12 2007 NG CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 2 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER • • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. N/A 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) EXISTING VALUE = $1.5 .Mi,llion..;......._PROPOSE_D..._:.._ALUE,,..,,,,=,.,,_.,$2,,,,,0._....a r ......................... n... ...... ......:.. ........ o........ . THE PROP©5ED PROJECT WILL INCREASE THE.VALUE._;.__OF...._ABUTTI PR PE N T ..... ....... .......... ...... .. .... ... ,..... ...... ..... .... ........ O.. kZ...LE.S ......... ............ 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. YES::- THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF A_4,;-.CA$.._„GA1 G.E.._..AND POOLmLANA!-ON-THE_F=RST _._ ___ FLQOR.AND._....GAN1E./HOBBY_..AND-GUEST'I'__.P O"NL!7TTiE_-SFCON-H F-LO©1R. -- -- , 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. YES - HARBOR OAKS HAS SEVERAL RESIDENCES THAT HAVE UN-ATTACHED GARAGE AND GUEST HOUSE STRUCTURES. 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. SINCE THE ORIGINAL CARRIAGE HOUSE WAS SOLD AS A PRIVATE RESIDENCE YEARS AGO FROM THIS ESTATE, THE NEW PROPOSED STRUCTURE WILL REPLACE THAT MISSING ELEMENT. THIS BEAUTIFUL ESTATE WILL BE COMPLETE AGAIN - 6. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT DOES NOTHING MORE THAN ENHANCE THE SURROUNDING ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................ . PROPERTIES AND HARBOR OAKS. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 3 of 8 • E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included ....................... ....................... Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor Sheet A-1 elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 12 2007 C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 4 of 8 CITY OF CLEARWATER • • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; .................. Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ................... Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; ................... Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; ................... Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; .................. Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; ........ ........... Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and .................. Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; ........ ...... .... Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; .................. Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; .................. Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and ................... Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED See _attached drawings and area tabulations on Sheet A-1 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ................... All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER C:\Documenls and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 5 of 8 0 • H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions-of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ................... Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11. ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residentia1 Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 6 of 8 0 • J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) i] Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 0 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562- 4750. K. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculations. Water Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the developer due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. If a fire pump is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to include NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. El Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations/water study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is included. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not required. ORIGINAI- CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW RECEIVED CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BIf,EP I Z RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. J If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevention Department at (727) 562-4334. PLANNING CITY OF C L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photogrgph the property described in this application. owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS SSworn t??.oooo and subscribed before me this i-PV day of h a ,/?LFJ A.D. 20 0 'I to me and/or by who is personally known has produced as identification. c... ... ................................................................................................ Notary public, My commission expires: ?H 4, Comm# DDOW9382 CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infll Projit doc E49fes 7/11/2011 Page 7 of 8 = s4 ±`a#01 Florida NotarYASW" Inc M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: KIELY MAY ALLEN- STEVEN SCOTT ALLEN 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 403 MAGNOLIA DRIVE, CLEARWATER, FL 33756 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) FRONT YARD BUILDING SETBACK 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: J.W. SMITH DESIGN GROUP, LLC as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. -?-?r p y Owner ---_____ ?? -----_- Property Owner .......... ...................... ........ ...................................................-........... ....................... ........................ ................................... . ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this /--2 -a' day of Personally appeared // EI 1 L p4 __ who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. %, Comm# DD0689382 'F E Expires 7/11/2011 Notary Seal/Stamp x'12 ?l hplM Flpride NotaryAsen., Inc R@11051611 some-to ????n????????????????????• .. .. .. rS t? ......Votary .....................................................-...................................Public Sign t re My Commission Expires: W -'r //./,;a d5'--/J ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 14a 2007 CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infll Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 8 of 8 ARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • r COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance: $320,000.00 Policy No. A02-316072 Premium: Company File No. CL305984 Agent File No. 2627 Date of Policy: February 9, 1998 at 2:22 P.M. as of Instrument Number 98-038017 1. Name of Insured: KIELY M. ALLEN 2. The Estate or interest iri the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is a fee simple interest, and is at the date of policy hereof vested in the named insured as shown by instrument recorded in Official Records Book 9986, page 2358, of the.Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Lot.82, LESS the East 50 feet thereof and all of Lots 84 and 86, CORRECTED MAP OF HARBOR OAKS, according to the Plat thereof on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County, Florida recorded in Plat Book 3, page 65, said lands situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida. Baxter & Strohauer, P.A. 1150 Cleveland Street Suite 300 Clearwater, FL 3461 (813) 442-6116 Countersigi A81 ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r , `Clearwater 1, 11 u Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-5624567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION -Plans and application are required to be collated, stapled, and folded into sets ? SUBMIT FIRE PRELIMARY SITE PLAN: $200.00 ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $_T(Z(? 0 CASE #: f " ls. > c2Q2 024Q V/ RECEIVED BY (staff initials): DATE RECEIVED: nPwG,I9AL KL ; I; "/ED 3 2007 PLANNING Dii PARTIVIENT CITY OF CLEARWATER * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Residential Infill Project - Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) (Revised 04/24/2007) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): List ALL owners on the deed AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: CELL NUMBER: 403 Magnolia Drive Clearwater FL 33756 (727) 447-1171 FAX NUMBER: (727) 444-4419 (727) 480-3844 EMAIL: kallen@idatix,com J. W. Smith Des Croup, LLC 35095 U.S. H 19 North Ste 101, Palm Harbor FL 34684 (727) 78544441 FAX NUMBER: (727) 789-6275 EMAIL: roger@iwsmithdesign.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) PROJECT NAME: STREET ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER(S): PARCEL SIZE (acres): LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED USE(S): Allen Residence PROJECT VALUATION: $500,000.00 403 Magnolia Drive, Clearwater, FL 33756 Part of Lot 82 and all of Lots 84 and 86 0.54 acres PARCEL SIZE (square feet): 23,399 s . f . The west 25.00 feet of Lot 82 and all of Lot 84 and Lot 86, correct map of Harbor Oaks, as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 56 of the pub records of Pinellas County, Florida. Single family residential intill DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: _ecuest t.? ?otGt 2-story addition to single fan .Specifically identify the request detached dwelling with a 10'-0" front yard setback. (include number of units or square footage of non-residential use and all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) d c CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 1 of 8 • 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO _ (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 7) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed 2-story addition is the same architectural style as the existing residence, which is one of the oldest in Harbor Oaks. The addition and existing .......... ... .................. ............... ....................................................................................................................... .................. .-...................... _........... ..................... ..................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................ .......................... . .residence combined cover only 300 of the property. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed addition will increase the value of the present dwelling, therefore increasing the value of the surrounding residences. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed addition will nit have a1?acltiers_e aff?Ct_on_theersons _ residing or working in the, nei_ghhborhQOd._ __ 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Except for a circular driveway, there is..__..pres_ently no,..off-street parking..._for..._the .......................... . ......... ............. ........ owner's. vehicles. The proposed cjarage and drive addition would minimize ......... ........... ..................................... .... ......... . on-Street parking for thi_s:_..._res,idence, .......... ...... . 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The...... p..,re,sent.......re_.s...: de.nce........doe..s......no..t._.._h.ave.......a..:....g.ara.ge... ...............Tha........carr.i.age.......hous.e.......t.o.......thi.s..................................... residence. was sold a.....private.._____re_ski_den_ce....yea....rs......_ago,,. .............. The......propose.d. ..._new.,..._stru_cture ........ ............ ..................................................... . is re.......... resentative of ....._th.............. . ._ old....._ carria.ge......_ house-.............. ............................................ ............................ ..................... ................................................................. ........................................................ .......... . . . . . . . . . . . ............... . . . . . . . . . .................... . .................... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. e,,at . The apP Koval of the .n_ew....,_c...a.r....r_ia,. e....._ho..us_e..„,_has......no......_a.d..ve_r.se..,..._a_f,fe.<ror...,.ng .v ... ................................................ ....... ....... ............ g impact on the surrounding area. . . ........... . ............................... . . . . . . . .. ...................... . ......... ......................... .... .... . . . . . . . . ..................... . . . . . . ............................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................. . ...................... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................................. .....................................................................................................:.................................................................................. ....................................... ....................................... .......... ................................. .......................... _.................................................................................................................................... ................................. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 2 of 8 • • WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Residential Infill Project Criteria) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. N/A .2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) Existing value = $1.5 million.,.....,propo,se.d_va,lue.= $2.0 million. ............... The PP........ r0 Osed p. r'-.e....ct...._wi_ll......_in-creas_e ,.....the.......v...al..u...e,,.....o.fa ......,but_tin..,........-ro .................................... _, .. .............. ............................................................ ....... o..J . g . 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Yes - this roiect consists of a 4-car garage and wool lanai on the first floor and game/.hobby and guest room on the second floor. 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. Yes - Harbor Oaks has several residences that have un-attached garage and west house structures. 5. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Since the origJ nal carriage hQnse ?ntas soil d_as a-pr'- . te_re? derr years ado from this estater_ the new proDosed structure?a ]] _replace that missins?______?? element. This beaut f ul tate-ri.l.L-be_complebe_ again.._....._ 6. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The.......approva.l......o.f.....thi_s....._proj ect.......do.e-s....._nothin.?1....._more......_than....._enh.aue.......the........s.ur.ro_uridin.g .............._............ properties and Harbor Oaks. CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 3 of 8 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria Manual and 4-202.A.21) ? A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. ? If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following; ? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ? Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ? All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. ? Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; ? Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF STORMWATER PLAN REQUIREMENTS (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included ........... ................................... Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor Sht A-1 elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? TREE INVENTORY; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 4" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees;. ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; CADocuments and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 4 of 8 • G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; North arrow; a?Vt 5 Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; All dimensions; .................. Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; .. ............... .. Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and .................. Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; .................. Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; ................... Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; .................. Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces & driveways, expressed in square feet & percentage of the paved vehicular area; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED COLOR SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11); EXISTING REQUIRED PROPOSED See attached drawings and area tabulations on Sheet A-l. 11 ................................................. ....................................................... .......................... -............ ........... ... FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; ... ............... All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); ................... Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ........ .......... Structural overhangs; C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infill Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 5 of 8 • r H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; v? Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); ................... Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; ................... Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications, quantities, and spacing requirements of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; .................. Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED COLOR LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - with the following information; All sides of all buildings; Dimensioned; Colors (provide one full sized set of colored elevations); Materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - same as above to scale on 8'/2 X 11. C:\Documents and Settings\derek.ferguson\Desktop\planningforms_0707\Residential Infll Project (FLS) 04-24-07.doc Page 6 of 8 J. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) 0 Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: ¦ Will degrade acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 ore new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. -dKR ¦ Will affect a nearby to! ay segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual ' t of most hazardous Intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the st recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared t ccordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review M ger or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Developm Code for exceptions to this requirement. 0 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Appii must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study Is included. The study must include ummary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections ' entified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUI ENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATI0 UST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration En eering Department at (727) 562- 4750. K. FIRE FLOW WATER STUDY: Provide Fire Flow Calculation . ater Study by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure an adequate water supply is available and to determine if any upgrades are required by the veloper due to the impact of this project. The water supply must be able to support the needs of any required fire sprinkler, standpipe and/or fire pump. a fire pump Is required the water supply must be able to supply 150% of its rated capacity. Compliance with the 2004 Florida Fire Prevention Code to' ciude NFPA 13, MFPA 14, NFPA 20, NFPA 291, and MFPA 1142 (Annex H) is required. 0 Acknowledgement of fire flow calculations ter study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is' ciuded. Fire Flow Calculations/Water Study is not r fired. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULT THE REQUIREMENT FOR A FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS/ WATER STUDY AND NONE HAS TK.EN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCC If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Fire Prevenlta'Department at (727) 562-4334. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swor to and subs ribed before me this / St` day of ?c 5 A.D. 20 O to me and/or by ho is personally know has produced as identification. Notary public, My commission #DD 393878 Q SAPlanning 0epartmenNlpplica0on Formst0eveloprmnl Revie%02007 Forrm%Resldenifal Infia Project (FLS) 04-2430 Page 7 ofS 9A..a?N?m sos•AOQ,A Ic, STO- Iffillm0 • M. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1. Provide names of all property owners on deed - PRINT full names: T1t ?`?-- --_ lN?'?-.'1- ?-- -?--. __ --- -- --5-l?e.V??1 ?'ro?-t_?--?,l,z,?t -__ __. _ ?C3 oary 7 ?0 09.: ;gym o?N? #DD 393878 2. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 3. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) 4. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 5. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 6. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 7. That (1/w .the unders' ed uthority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Property O er Property Owner ro rty Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS /?J'Be??fore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of (if%?f?_ O O personally appeared t? who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. Notary Seal/Stamp Notary Public Signature My Commission Expires: 00?-0'2-C-91 SAPlanning Depart wAApplication FormslDevelopment RevieW%2007 FormslResidential Infll Protect (FLS) 04.24.07.doc Page 8 of 8 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OWNER'S POLICY SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance: $320,000.00 Policy No. A02-316072 Premium: Company File No. CL305984 Agent File No. 2627 Date of Policy: February 9, 1998 at 2:22 P.M. as of Instrument Number 98-038017 1. Name of Insured: KIELY M. ALLEN 2. The Estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is a fee simple interest, and is at the date of policy hereof vested in the named insured as shown by instrument recorded in Official Records Book 9986, page 2358, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Lot 82, LESS the East 50 feet thereof and all of Lots 84 and 86, CORRECTED MAP OF HARBOR OAKS, according to the Plat thereof on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Pinellas County, Florida recorded in Plat Book 3, page 65, said lands situate, lying and being in Pinellas County, Florida. Baxter & Strohauer, P.A. 1150 Cleveland Street Suite 300 Clearwater, FL 34615 (813)_ 442-6116 Countersigned: A81 C ITI' OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 ?'.'gTER? ;i Of . TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT January 18, 2008 Mr. Jeff Smith J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 101 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 Re: FLS2007-08041 / 403 Magnolia Drive Dear Mr. Smith: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On January 15, 2008, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your appeal ... appeal from a Level One (flexible standard development) decision pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4- 501.A.3, that a requested reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project is inconsistent with the Flexibility Criteria as set forth in CDC Sections 2-203.B.1.a and 2-203.B.1.c, as well as, the General Standards for Level One Approvals as set forth in CDC Sections 3- 913.A.1 and 3-913.A.5. The CDB GRANTED the appeal, reversing the previous development order, based upon the evidence and testimony presented in the application, the Staff Report and at the hearing, and made the following findings of fact based on said evidence and issued the conclusions of law that the application complies with Community Development Code Sections 2-203.13.1, 2-203.B.1.c, 3-913.A.1 and 3-913.A.5. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft@gnyclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 1 0 ALLEN VARIANCE APPEAL: Request to construct 2-story addition to a single family detached dwelling with a 20'-0" front yard setback. Propose structure will be in line with the adjacent residence located at 415 Magnolia. March 2003 - Zoning Approval was granted by the City of Clearwater Building Department for a 20'-0" front yard building setback for this project (See Exhibit A). The project was then put on hold. 2. August 2007 - the project was redesigned and an application for variance was submitted asking for a 10'-0" front yard setback. 3. August 31, 2007 DRC recommends denial of the variance application. 4. J.W. Smith Design Group withdraws application; therefore, application is not submitted to the Community Development Board. 5. J.W. Smith Design Group redesigns the project based on a 20'-0" front yard setback as originally designed approved. (See Exhibit B - Color Site Plan and Building Plans and Exterior Elevations, Color Photograph of Existing House) 6. September 12, 2007 J.W. Smith Design Group resubmitted variance request, asking for 20'-0" front yard setback. 7. Given approval on October 4, 2007. At DRC meeting told to proceed ahead to building permit phase. DRC was not requesting any additional information. 8. October 25, 2007 J.W. Smith Design Group received a letter from the Planning Department identifying that a block survey would be a suggested means of determining uniformity. Mrs. Allen received this request on October 31, 2007. As stated in the Planning Department letter, this new information was to be submitted to the Planning Department by noon on November 1, 2007. As stated in Mrs. Allen's e-mail to Mr. Tefft on October 31, 2007, a block survey would not be required. "It was mentioned that a Google Earth map and examples would be satisfy such a neighborhood survey". This information was submitted by J.W. Smith Design Group, but as stated in the Planning Department letter of October 23, 2007, this information is not sufficient. 10. On November 6, 2007 a letter was received from the Planning Department dated November 1, 2007, stating that since the conditions stated in the October 25, 2007 letter were not met within the time frame allowed, the application be denied. 11. On November 8, 2007 an appeal application was filed giving four (4) reasons for the basis of appeal. 12. January 8, 2008 submit block survey photos of (20) buildings, located in Harbor Oaks, Clearwater, Florida neighborhood, that have improvements constructed within the 25'-0" setback requirement (See Exhibit C). EXHIBIT C • Aerial photos of building built in Harbor Oaks that have improvements constructed within the 25'-0" setback requirement. 415 Magnolia Drive 4 00 M agno lia Drive 314 Magnolia Drive 322 Magnolia Drive 908 Sout h Fort Harrison 1000 South Fort Harrison 714 South Fort Harrison 800 South Fort Harrison 315 Jasmine Way 409 Lotus Path 430 Lotus Path 310 Lotus Path 316 Lotus Path 323 Druid Road 401 Druid Road 420 Druid Road 430 Druid Road 432 Druid Road _ 711 Bay Avenue • Block Surve y of all buildings as they relate to F the property in question at 403 Magnolia Drive. • Exterior pho tos o f a ll buil d ings l isted a bove. 7 -Al-mom &I ANN Ilk, Pk s" i S lip, P w IV T r ?n 1 . Lim ?.. P ?' 8. ?3 .1-?? . A y ?? II t I r s r f r s 1. i Al I k I rte-,-r _ t, 9 -' r ? .- r-:x M 5 `' s?y.,;• ? ,. ?"ti;,?i ? , y.1 {19+9 .`?? "4i S'???"?6? ?' 4e f' Lp .'i-fJC a v -,, 4 IM" K'AA; u a. r y ?}? i 4!? y ?? JT -Rep w 9. i or "low kA r- t s r , z? U`V 1 ? ff ? d" t,44( ?,L ?? k P t to? ;• s,?`;, 7 f '. +A l Itz yi 44 wRi'' S 40 -y J n 5 40 "4 ar ?"1 : gab 1 -?;'t?"'. ."'1._?- asd,•.._ -.- t ?', ; j 11/t 1 A `1 t s_ ? i 1?' ? 1 FJ?? ?t - Ilk r . Pi x „tom: r U,4 :z f 5'y !" r f.II I??gW u y? S iiI I ? ? mN',!pY? Pi il l 1 315 Jasmine Way f n t?.F,d„Cy x ? .,, 441 V • r?rW :. Ali ell 'yy?-A `y .._ygd.??'r?. . ,. r? T FW?? y..,?? ^ , ° ? ? ? ?.va: s M ».r, '??°?,. ??? ar? y ? ,?',:,• r`?'„? ,- f - ,'x A ! .C IR.,; t yo de'"}J a?! ztp t# i'? It 4 i ??-?', NM?, `. ??''a?" 3'; ," ?! 'a ?N,'.% ? rs t rT ' a ?, ? T?.awkn "`?'# ?g !'?k.? ?;F , .•y.. ?"f? v? ; g` • ..?,.. ? -? ..? "? 1' xi'e. -; +nr ": ';u d;, ,' e q: J ore.a+ ,thy,.'! n-, k,?,. •...t'C ? h 1, a. q -?,k "?j ,'?,.,.I•! ??s n.d? ?. ? a.:l +.?' .is.r y"°&,?ir.?!;Kr?' ?S? yy. ??,, 5.4?,a,,t" „i,?4ll?*"', •a`"? ?. +,? &'J, ` ??? ? • A'C °!R ?t t i 7' ? +v 'A ?Tyrf ? '?. ' ? 1+• .+?'? +? t ?Y' ?S?s 4$ r • 1: i t - - a-?? : it ?:?jy+ ,q '? fFV. a'x 6`C" ? ' "'. '? rf ' .'. e' .'? ?' t ?y? ? ? r "? `? `" Fe. a '',? x-'. ". ? ? ?' ?" •,. :•''` ?' v g 4 - _p r t, .. ? 9?, X71. ?. ?y.,.' Z? _ ????t ?+i ,„? ??•?,?i' pq, d? s n' ri t - '` ' Y r a3 rc M'-?.a r" s r. ? f F y?C AOL- ,1k' 1 w P Fa m+' y I&L :,4 ex pe? S•?, '4t ? yam, ? p . S >?` '?` ?y?.•? ? ? ? i?? _ ay' ? "'? .. ' 9M • ..rte ? e f"e'+ t ?', ?" r a a t ,op fl, h I ? f? iw 4 !r 7?04 &Z-fW ??9 11} Y ) 1• ? t _. ye'x ',k,y.?:?. ?! .i.?,.? F'r?_ ? ? ,.1% R+• R?.?` i.. tt"y ;.,,?,??svM?`r °r'?yR?'r 1*'?''r ? ?. p.,' r'. M re i . -Y`N Fry"' n?L nr ?'?`' n " m ( ?: Aa;.ty 1a"? C n `!', yd x? Fo ?; k .y N ,} r °S 4' 'd ! wra i s ,•?. • _,;?' r 'S y ,,* a '?.. .rf .? p ?a';,^' : ,r? ' ?L ji { ?,fE ??.?` r-4'+ 1 ?.'?" ? a ? <: BY ".}1? r e C'° r?-. y?;d,. a"" d, v .u?,y, ? ..; ?? 4h*.:.1151 ? .. ? #'dt.1'x tt ,'1' 3 x v^? dS. ° v q'4?t' ? . ii t , •.?..? ?.. r 4? t ;?' ? ?a a ?t??? iS?4 +. a '?? _q ?. ? wt ?; ^ ° ;.?, • . X. ;.. 4u wr• , ? ? z .?. i,..s __ .. 4! _ _.`ta:a _e f... :?' ... ? :°, ^a':f?::.°.` ??`. '? .'.7 ., _ _ _ ?,'r.. ?`??,., •?w` `?!" _ . a ?` "fib n f D1 Druid R ITinre¦. r .? +? :? :? ? Vii.. :?h.? -. a,1?:. ?. a F V c i 0- c i. V. AQ11 ne, 4A I ?- • I a n_ x t o Mgr 't h' Ilk i4 e y ? x ,s 23- obw I?''ll U 9 0 W M, `RICEND J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC 35095 U.S. Highway 19 North Suite 101 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Ph: (727) 785-4441 Fax: (727) 789-6275 Letter of Transmittal JAN 0 9 2008 plAW* DEpARTMEM CM of CL%RWA7ER Date: January 8, 2008 To: City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Attn: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III From: Jeff Smith Re: 403 Magnolia Drive Variance Appeal We are sending via: ? US Mail ? Fed Ex ? Fed Ex ? Courier ? Pick Up X Delivery Overnight Ground The following items: ? Plans ? Specifications ? Letter X Submittals 15 Copies Variance Appeal Package Consisting of: Appeal Breakdown Sheet, Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C These are being transmitted: ? For review and comment X As requested ? For review and signature ? Returned X For your use ? Signed and Sealed 0 • CITY OF CLEARWATER L PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: December 19, 2007 To: Jeff Smith, (727) 789-6275 From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLS2007-08041 / 403 Magnolia Drive Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: Jeff:. Please find attached a copy of the most recent letter received from the Harbor Oaks Association (the letter, dated December 131h, is the same as a previous letter dated September 27`") Also, with the submittal of the additional information for the Board on January 8"', you should provide 15 copies. ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefft(cDnzycleanvater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** • H ARBOR OAKS ASSOCIATION December 13, 2007 • CLEARWAT R • F.LOR I City of Clearwater Planning Department Community Development Board 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: APPEAL BY KIELY M. ALLEN FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 403 MAGNOLIA DRIVE (FLS 2007-08041) FILE #APP2007-00003 Dear Sirs: Regarding the application for Flexible Standard Development 403 Magnolia Drive, Clearwater, FL for an addition to an existing single family detached dwelling with a Reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) as per section 2-203B of the community development code. Historic Harbor Oaks is a zoned R-1 single family residential. The Harbor Oaks Association and its membership have over the years vigorously opposed any attempt to Change or infringe on the single family R-1 residential zoning and character of Historic Harbor Oaks. It has taken years of concerted effort on the part of Harbor Oaks Association members in Cooperation with the City of Clearwater Board of Commissioners and City Employees to Establish and obtain registration of Harbor Oaks in the National Register of Historic Places. WE HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY MR. ROBERT JONES, A HISTORIC SITE SPECIALIST WITH THE PRESERVATION BUREAU OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, THAT A VARIANCE COULD RESULT IN A DWELLING BEING DESIGNATED AS NON-CONTRIBUTORY TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. VARIANCES MAY THEN CAUSE THE LOSS OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR HARBOR OAKS. D A D E D I C A T E D T 0 N E I G H B 0 R H 0 0 D B E T T E R M E N T Any deviation from the requirements of the single family R-1 residential designation and Set backs in conformance to the zoning code cannot be viewed as anything other than Detrimental to the character and ambiance of our historic neighborhood and will distract From the significant Historical District designation in the National Register of Historic Places. The Harbor Oaks Association requests that the application be denied and respectfully solicit the support of the Board of Commissioners and the City of Clearwater in our Endeavor to preserve and protect Historic Harbor Oaks and its listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Yours sincerely, Harbor Oaks Association X/"e Cedio S. Saltarelli President CC: Honorable Frank Hibbard - Mayor Honorable John Doran - Vice Mayor Honorable George N. Cretekos - Councilmember Honorable A. Petersen - Councilmember Honorable Paul F. Gibson - Councilmember 0 0 + C_ V +•rs? ? ? PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 1, 2007 Mr. Jeff Smith CITY OF C LEARWATR POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 101 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 Re: FLS2007-08041 / 403 Magnolia Drive Dear Mr. Smith: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On October 4, 2007, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your Flexible Standard Development application for an addition to an existing single-family detached dwelling with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project as per Section 2-203.B of the Community Development Code. The DRC recommended the approval of this application subject to specifically outlined conditions being addressed within the timeframe set forth in Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4-302.13 (by November 1, 2007). These conditions have not been addressed, and consequently positive findings cannot be made with regard to the application. Therefore, the application is hereby DENIED based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: Findings of Fact 1. That the 0.54 acre subject property is located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Drive and Bay Avenue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That there are no active Code Enforcement violations associated with the subject property. 4. That the request to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet requires that positive findings be made with regard to the Flexibility Criteria set forth in CDC Section 2-203.B; and 5. That the request to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet requires that positive findings be made with regard to the General Applicability Criteria set forth in CDC Section 3-913.A. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 2-203.B.1.a, in that a determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 2-203.B. Lc, in that the reduction in front setback shall be consistent with neighborhood character; 3. That . the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 3-913.A.1, in that the proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located; and FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" November 1, 2007 0 0 FLS2007-08041 / 403 Magnolia Drive Page 2 of 2 4. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 3-913.A.5, in that the proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-502.A, an appeal of a Level One (flexible standard development) application decision may be initiated by the applicant within seven days of the date the development order is issued. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on Thursday, November 8, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.teffigMyclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmenIIC D BTlex Standard (FLS)IInactive or Finished CasesWagnolia 403 -Allen Residence (LMDR) Denied 11-01-071Magnolia 403 - Development Order Denial 11-01-07.doc 0 0 -? CITY OF CLEAR ATER I' POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, ZOO SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 *!?t,? 4TEWf0eot TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT October 23, 2007 J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 101 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 Re: FLS2007-08041 1 403 Magnolia Drive Dear Mr. Smith: This letter is being provided to you as the designated agent for the above referenced project. The information submitted at the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting of October 4, 2007, has been reviewed for compliance with those comments of the DRC set forth at the same meeting. While the additional information is appreciated, it does not sufficiently address the Planning Department comments concerning this application. The following comments have been identified as outstanding and must be sufficiently addressed prior to issuance of a Development Order approving this application: ? Pursuant to Section 2-203.13. La of the Community Development Code (CDC), a determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way. Provide evidence (such as a block survey) that the proposed building addition at a setback of 20 feet will be consistent with a regular/uniform setback already established by structures in the neighborhood. The information having already been provided is not indicative of a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way having been established for the neighborhood. The information provided states that there are three (3) properties along Magnolia Drive with a setback of 20 feet; however there are 18 properties that front on Magnolia (not including the subject property). Three out of 18 properties having a 20 foot setback does not constitute a regular or uniform setback in the neighborhood. If there are additional properties along Magnolia Drive with a building setback consistent with that being proposed, then please provide additional information to this effect -preferably through a block survey. ? Pursuant to Section 2-203.B.1.b of the CDC, the reduction in front setback shall not adversely affect adjacent property values. Provide evidence/justification that the proposed setback reduction will not have such an adverse affect. The information having already been provided does not address this criteria. The submission of information from the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office regarding the current conditions for the subject property is not evidence/justification that the requested reduction in front setback will not adversely affect adjacent property values - it is only indicative of the current value of the subject property. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER All% CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 0 ? Pursuant to Section 2-203.B.1.c of the CDC, the reduction in front setback shall be consistent with neighborhood character. Provide evidence (such as a block survey) that existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed at a setback consistent with the proposed 20-foot setback. The information having already been provided is not indicative that the requested reduction in front setback will be consistent with the established neighborhood character. As discussed above, if there are additional properties along Magnolia Drive with a building setback consistent with that being proposed, then please provide additional information to this effect -preferably through a block survey. In addition to the above, the information previously submitted contains inaccuracies and irrelevancies. Regarding the wall/column at 304 Magnolia Drive - setbacks for walls are governed by a different section of the Code and its setback would not be an accurate comparison for the requested setback reduction. Regarding the poolcage at 322 Magnolia Drive - this property was granted a variance in 1996 to replace a storm damaged poolcage that had existed since 1954. The varience allowed for a front setback of 18 feet along Magnolia Drive. Finally, regarding the residence at 415 Magnolia Drive - a variance was granted in 1995, in part, for a reduction to the front setback to 22 feet, not 20 feet as indicated in the information you have submitted. Next Step: Submittal of Revised Plans Submit sufficient evidence/justification to address the above comments to the Planning Department. This information must be submitted no later than Noon, November 1, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department, City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: rbert. tefftna,myclearwater. com • 0 ALLEN RESIDENCE PROPERTIES ALONG MAGNOLIA DRIVE: 1114 5'-0" HIGH WALL & COLUMN 5'-0" FROM PROPERTY LINE I 314 HOME 20'-0" FROM PROPERTY LINE 322 BIRDCAGE 20'-0" FROM PROPERTY LINE 415 HOME & WALL 20'-0" FROM PROPERTY LINE 35095 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 103, Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Ph: (727) 785-4441 Fax: (727) 789-0077 www.jwsmithdesign.com 7 I of 3 9/6/2007 9:42 AM Property Appraiser General Information: 16/29/15/36270/000/0840 ... http://www.pcpao.org/general_radet.php?pn=1529163627000008401 4 of 4 9/6/2007 8:55 AM Property Appraiser General Information: 16/29/15/36270/000/0840 ... t 1 • http://www.pcpao.org/general_radet.php?pn=1529163627000008401 • Interactive Map of Comparable Sales Back to Query New Tax Collector this parcel Listing Results Search Information 16/29/15/36270/000/0540 Building 1 Data Current as of September SUPER EXEMPTION 06, 2007 CALCULATOR [8:46 am Thursday September 6] Question/Comment about this page Residential Property Owner, Address, and Sales Print Single Family Property Use: 210 Living Units: 1 HARBOR OAKS LOTS 84 & 86 AND W 25FT OF LOT 82 2007 Exemptions Homestead: Yes Use: 100 % Ownership: 100 % Tax Exempt: 0 % Government: No Institutional: No Agricultural: $0 Historic: $0 2007 Value Save-Our-Homes Cap 2007 Tax Information Comparable Sales value based on sales from Tax District: CW 2005-2006: $1,272,100 Proposed Millage: 19.9371 Just/Market Value: $1,068,100 Non Ad Valorem Assessments: $.00 Assessed Value/ SOH Cap: $798,340 Estimated Taxes: $15,418.20 History Taxable Value: $773,340 Estimated Taxes without $20,796.40 A significant taxable value increase may Save-Our-Homes cap: occur when sold. Click here for details.. Estimated Taxes without an ,294.80 $21 exemptions: Owner/Mailing Property Address Address ALLEN, KIELY M 403 MAGNOLIA DR 403 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756-3837 Parcel Information Book/Page: Land Use: Single Family 09986/2358 (01) Evacuation Zone: Census Tract:.00 NON-EVAC Sale Date Book/Page 2/1998 9986 / 2358 Plat Year 1914 Price ()/U V/I $320,000 Q I Plat B_ ook/Page(s) 003 / 065 1 of 4 9/6/2007 8:55 AM Property Appraiser General Information: 16/29/15/36270/000/0840 • Seawall: No Land Use Single Family(01) http://www.pcpao.org/general_radet.php?pn=1529163627000008401 0 Land Information Frontage: None View: Land Size Unit Value Units Method 180 x 130 4,000.00 180.00 F Structural Elements Foundation: Continuous Wall Floor System: Wood Exterior Wall: Frame/Siding Roof Frame: Gable-Hip Roof Cover: Concrete Tile/Average Metal 3 Stories Floor Finish: Carpet/Hard Tile/Hardwood/Marble/Parquet Interior Finish: Upgrade Fixtures: 24 Quality: Excellent Year Built: 1925 i Effective Age: 25 Heating: Central Duct Cooling: Cooling (Central) Other Depreciation: 0 Functional Depreciation: 0 Economic Depreciation: 0 Open plot in New Window View Floor: 1 2 3 Help 2 of 4 9/6/2007 8:55 AM Property Appraiser General Information: 16/29/15/36270/000/0840 ... http://www.pcpao.org/general_radet.php?pn=1529163627000008401 Sub Area Information Description Living Area Ft2 Gross Area Ft2 Factor Effective Ft2 Base Area 3,650 3,650 1.00 3,650 Upper Story Finished 2,830 2,830 .90 2,547 Enclosed Porch Finished 374 .60 224 Open Porch Finished 312 .20 62 Upper Story (low) 2,478 .30 743 Total Living SF: 6,480 Total Gross SF: 9,644 Total Effective SF: 7,227 Residential Extra Features Description Dimensions Value/Unit Units Total NewValue Depreciated Value Year , Fireplace $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 $2,800.001925 Patio/Deck 905 $12.00 905 $10,860.00 $10,530.00 2005 Spa/Jacuzzi/Hot Tub $9,000.00 1 $9,000.00 $8,730.00 2005 Patio/Deck ST-3 $24.00 195 $4,680.00 $1,870.00 1925 Patio/Deck ST-2 $24.00 117 $2,810.00 $1,120.001925 Pool $24,000.00 1 $24,000.00 $23,280.00 2005 3 of 4 9/6/2007 8:55 AM F/ • • 1:20 pm Case Number: FLS2007-08041 - 403 MAGNOLIA DR Owner(s): Kiely M Allen 403 Magnolia Dr Clearwater, Fl 33756 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant J.W. Smith Design Group, Llc 35095 Us Highway 19 North Palm Harbor, F134684 TELEPHONE: 727-758-4441, FAX: 727-789-6275, E-MAIL: roger@jwsmithdesign.com Location: 0.54 acres located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Drive and Bay Avenue Atlas Page: 295B Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Standard Development approval for an addition to an existing single-family detached dwelling with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project as per Section 2-203.13 of the Community Development Code. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33758 P O Box 8204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc Association(s): Clearwater, F133756 320 Magnolia Drive TELEPHONE: 461-9657, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Steve Doherty, Jim Keller Kiely Allen, J.W. Smith The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . 1. The existing sidewalk within the right-of-way is to be removed to the nearest joint beyond the proposed drive apron/driveway and replaced per City standards by the applicant. 2. If brick pavers are used for driveway installation, a separate right-of-way permit will be required for paver installation within the right-of-way. See Don Melone 727.562.4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). The above shall be addressed prior to building permit. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues. Fire: NO ISSUES Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: I . No Issues. Landscaping: I . No issues. Parks and Recreation: I . No issues - 2 story addition to single family residence. Stormwater: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 4, 2007 - Page 21 0 • The following shall be addressed prior to building permit. 1. Show finished floor elevation of the existing and proposed structures. Proposed finished floor elevation shall be at the minimum of 1' above crown of the road. (Community Development Code Sec. 47.005(1)(a). 2. Indicate on the plan the proposed elevation of the bottom of the vinyl gate. Show that this gate will not block the flow of the swale. General note: 1. DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: I . The following conditions to be addressed prior to a building permit: Correctly draw the 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways per City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904. Planning: 1 . Pursuant to Section 2-203.B. La of the Community Development Code (CDC), a determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way. Provide evidence (such as a block survey) that the proposed building addition at a setback of 20 feet will be consistent with a regular/uniform setback already established by structures in the neighborhood. Pursuant to Section 2-203.13. Lb of the CDC, the reduction in front setback shall not adversely affect adjacent property values. Provide evidence/justification that the proposed setback reduction will not have such an adverse affect. 3 . Pursuant to Section 2-203.B. Lc of the CDC, the reduction in front setback shall be consistent with neighborhood character. Provide evidence (such as a block survey) that existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed at a setback consistent with the proposed 20-foot setback. 4?4 . Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant must provide a recorded copy of the Declariation of Restrictive Covenant. Pursuant to Section 3-1402.B of the CDC, there shall be no more than one entrance and one exit /,t t o i?D or one combined entrance and exit per property along any street unless otherwise determined necessary by the traffic engineer to alleviate congestion and improve traffic flow. The proposal exceeds the number of curb cuts allowable as per the above, and must be redesigned accordingly. Other: No Comments Notes: The DRC recommends approval of the application, subject to the attached conditions being addressed. Revised plans and/or application materials must be recieved by 10/15/07 with a final determination to be made no later than 11/01/07. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, October 4, 2007 - Page 22 s • f1?x?rr>r . Ilf '?, ®?Of TllFf?i?. ,•' ?.?: 4TEE f {??rwwrllf PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 15, 2007 CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 101 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 Re: FLS2007-08041- 403 Magnolia Drive - Letter of Completeness Dear Sir or Madam: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2007-08041. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on Thursday, September 6, 2007, in the Planning Department Conference Room (Room 216), which is located on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. You will be contacted by the Planning Department's Administrative Analyst within one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robei-t.tefftC?,nzyclearwczter.corn FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • • August 13, 2007 City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Attn: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: FLS2007-08041 403 Magnolia Drive - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Tefft: This letter and enclosed attachments are in response to your "Letter of Incompleteness" dated August 8, 2007. 1. There are no palms or trees in the area of the proposed structure. Please see notation o the Site Plan. 2. The Site Plan has been revised to show sight triangles. See enclosed Site Plan Sheet A-1. 3. Revised architectural elevations are included and are to scale 1/4" = 1'-0". The previous elevations submitted were drawn to this scale but were reduced in order to fit on an 11" x 17" sheet. Please note that the overall building height has been added. 4. Under Section 2-203.C - Item (1) is a statement, no response required. Item (2) requires a deviation on the front yard setback from 25' to 10'. Items (3-8) have been answered in one form or another in D. Written Submittal Requirements Code Section 3-913.A and Residential Infill Project Criteria. Should you require any further information please contact me. Respectfully submitted, ORIGINAL Roger I. Painter RECEIVED Project Architect AUG 13 2007 RIP/paf PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWAT Enclosures ER 35095 U.S. Highway 19 North, Suite 103, Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Ph: (727) 785-4441 Fax: (727) 789-0077 www.jwsmithdesign.com ~+/if ?TGT??` ??"Ir" 1 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 8, 2007 0 • CITY OF C LEARWATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC 35095 US Highway 19 North, Suite 101 Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 Re: FLS2007-08041- 403 Magnolia Drive - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Sir or Madam: The Planning Department staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLS2007-08041. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: Section F of the application requires the provision of both a tree survey and a tree inventory for the subject property. These items must be submitted in order for the application to be complete. If no palms or trees exist within the areas affected by the development proposal, then provide a notation on the site plan to this effect; 2. Section G of the application requires that the site plan depict all required sight visibility triangles. Also, the site plan provided is not to-scale. Provide a revised site plan that is to-scale and depicts the required sight triangles; The architectural elevations submitted with the application are not to-scale. Provide to-scale architectural elevations; and 4. Based upon the attachment of the proposed addition with the existing structure and the floor plan for said addition (which contains a kitchen), the overall structure is considered to be attached dwellings. Such a use can only be processed/approved through an Flexible Development (FLD) Residential Infill application as per Section 2-204.13 of the Community Development Code and requires the approval of the Community Development Board (CDB).. Therefore, an additional fee of $ is required and the written responses to the criteria set' forth in Section 2-204.13 of the Community Development Code must be provided. In order to be considered under the current application (FLS Residential Infill), the propsoed plans would need to be revised to eliminate the kitchen. The elimination of the kitchen would alter the interpretation of the use from attached dwellings to a detached dwelling. It is noted that during this review it was identified that the Residential Infill Project Criteria denoted in the application are inconsistent with those actually contained in the Community Development Code. Attached is a copy of Section 2-203.C of the Community Development Code, which states the correct criteria. Provide written responses to each of these criteria if your choice is to keep the application as an FLS Residential Infill. FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Pursuant to Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code, if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff and no further development review action shall be taken until those specified deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit revised plans and application materials as per the above comments no later than Noon, Monday, August 13, 2007. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, -? 174 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert. tef iginyclearwater. com August 8, 2007 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL _ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: Roger, J.W. Smith Design Group, (727) 789-6275 • Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLS2007-08041 / 403 Magnolia Drive Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 3 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefft(Rmyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** Aug. 08 2007 04:05PM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX N0. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FAM MILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97896275 Aug.08 04:04PM 01'10 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: January 15, 2008 Case Number: APP2007-00003 Agenda Item: D. 1. Appellant/Owner: Kiely M. Allen Agent: J.W. Smith Design p, LLC. Address: 403 Magnolia Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: An appeal from a Level One (flexible standard development) decision pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4-501.A.3, that a requested reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project is inconsistent with the Flexibility Criteria as set forth in CDC Sections 2-203.B.1.a and 2- 203.B.1.c, as well as, the General Standards for Level One Approvals as set forth in CDC Sections 3-913.A.1 and 3-913.A.5. CURRENT ZONING: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached Dwelling Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling EXISTING SURROUNDING North: LMDR Detached Dwelling ZONING AND USES: South: LMDR Detached Dwelling East: LMDR Detached Dwelling West: LMDR Detached Dwelling UPDATE: At its meeting of December 18, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) heard an appeal on the above application. The Board elected to give the appellant a continuance to the following meeting of January 15, 2008, in order to provide further information regarding the case. On January 9, 2008, the appellant did submit further evidence to the Planning Department regarding their application. Upon review of this evidence, staff has made the following findings: ? The evidence provided does not address the findings the Board is required to make in order to grant an appeal. Most notably, no evidence had been provided by the appellant that the decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of this development code; ? The evidence provided attempts to address the criteria upon which the Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application was initially denied: Community Development Code (CDC) Sections 2-203.13. La and c, and 3-913.A.1 and 5; ? The evidence provided, in the opinion of staff, does not necessarily give a true account of the neighborhood. The aerial photographs/GIS information depict property lines that bisect existing buildings and driveways [ref.: aerial depicting 401 and 323 Druid Road]; therefore the relationship Community Development Board - January 15, 2008 APP2007-00003 - Page 1 • 0 between the aerial photograph and the property lines overlaid upon it is questionable, and consequently the setbacks being presented as evidence must be questionable as well. A further example is the property located at 310 Lotus Path, which as per the evidence submitted by the appellant has a front setback of 22.17 feet; however pursuant to a signed/sealed survey provided as part of the permit BCP2002-03336, the front setback is actually 25.6 feet; and ? The evidence provided takes into account a neighborhood comprised of 86 residentially used parcels, and of those 86 parcels only 15 were identified as having a setback of less than 25 feet. This accounts for 17.44% of the total parcels. Conversely, when only the 18 residential parcels on Magnolia Drive were considered, three, or 16.66%, were similarly identified. As such, the evidence provided by the appellant still supports the position that a regular/uniform setback of 25 feet or greater has been established in the neighborhood and a reduced setback would be inconsistent with that setback as well as the character of the neighborhood. Based upon the above, staff finds that the appellant has not provided substantial, competent evidence that the decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of this development code; and further stands by its original findings that the approval of the Level One (FLS) application to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) would be inconsistent with the Flexibility Criteria as set forth in CDC Sections 2-203.B.1.a and 2-203.B.1.c, as well as, the General Standards for Level One Approvals as set forth in CDC Sections 3-913.A.1 and 3-913.A.5. BACKGROUND: The 0.54-acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Magnolia Drive and Bay Avenue within the Harbor Oaks subdivision. The property consists of a single-family detached dwelling that according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office was constructed in 1925, although the building and property have been subsequently updated/improved. On August 3, 2007, a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application was submitted for a Residential Infill Project to allow an addition for the existing detached dwelling with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building). The applicant amended this request following the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting of September 6, 2007, changing the requested reduction from 10 feet to 20 feet. Following the amendment of the application, City staff conducted a review of the proposal and identified several issues. The review conducted by the Planning Department noted that pursuant to CDC Section 2- 203.B.1.a, a determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way. The application indicated that the proposal would be in keeping with the detached dwelling and privacy wall located 20 feet from the front property line on the abutting parcel to the east at 415 Magnolia Drive, as well as the properties located at 314 and 322 Magnolia Drive. However, other than this statement no evidence was provided to substantiate the claim or indicate what those setbacks might be at 314 and 322 Magnolia Drive. As such, staff commented that further evidence needed to be provided "(such as a block survey) that the proposed building addition at a setback of 20 feet will be consistent with a regular/uniform setback already established by structures in the neighborhood". In addition to the above, the Planning Department also noted that pursuant to CDC Section 2-203.B.1.c, the reduction in front setback shall be consistent with neighborhood character. No evidence addressing this criterion other than that previously noted was provided in the application. As such, staff commented that evidence needed to be provided "(such as a block survey) that existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed at a setback consistent with the proposed 20-foot setback". Community Development Board - January 15, 2008 APP2007-00003 - Page 2 • • On October 4, 2007, the DRC met with the property owner and designated agent for the subject development proposal to discuss the staff comments on the proposal. The Planning Department comments provided at the meeting identified certain criteria that needed to be satisfactorily addressed in for the application to be approved. Those comments further stated that the criteria needed to be addressed (through revised plans and/or application materials) by October 15, 2007 with a final determination on the application to be made no later than November 1, 2007. During the course of the meeting the owner/agent indicated that evidence in support of the reduced front setback had already been submitted to the case planner, who was not in attendance at the DRC meeting. This evidence was indicated as addressing the criteria set forth in CDC Sections 2-203.B.1.a, 2-203.B.1.b, and 2-203.B.1.c. The DRC mistakenly accepted this statement that evidence addressing the comments had been provided and while the owner/agent had provided evidence, it was, in fact, that same evidence that the comment was based upon. Upon being questioned by the agent, the DRC further indicated that the submittal of additional evidence to address those comments would not be necessary. Additionally, the DRC indicated to the owner/agent that following a consultation with the case planner, if there were no outstanding issues with the proposal, then a development order approving the application would be issued the next week. Subsequent to the DRC meeting, the evidence submitted by the owner/agent during the course of the meeting was reviewed by the case planner. The evidence was found to reference setbacks for the same three properties as the evidence having previously been submitted in the application with the addition of another property, 304 Magnolia Drive. However, the evidence on the new property was determined to be irrelevant to the request as it pertained to a five-foot high wall, the setbacks for which are governed by a different section of the Community Development Code. The evidence provided stated that there are three properties along Magnolia Drive with a setback of 20 feet; however there are 18 properties that front on Magnolia Drive (not including the subject property). The position of the Planning Department is that a 20-foot front setback for three of the 18 properties does not constitute a regular or uniform setback in the neighborhood that would support the request. In contrast, the evidence provided supported the position that a regular/uniform setback of 25 feet or greater had been established in the neighborhood and a reduced setback would be inconsistent with that setback as well as the character of the neighborhood. Therefore, on October 23, 2007, the Planning Department issued a letter to the designated agent for the project, that the information provided at the DRC meeting did not sufficiently address the Planning Department comments concerning the application, and further indicated that those comments needed to be sufficiently addressed prior to the issuance of a development order approving the application. Subsequently, the Planning Department staff discussed the letter of October 23rd with the agent as well as those events that transpired at the DRC meeting. It was relayed to the agent that while the DRC may have indicated that no further evidence was required, it was done in error due to confusion over what had already been provided by the owner/agent and what was actually being provided at the meeting. It was also relayed that even though the DRC may have indicated that the application was to be approved, it is not within the powers of the DRC to actually approve an application, and that the DRC only acts as a recommending body to the Community Development Coordinator who is ultimately responsible for the approval or denial of a Level One (flexible standard development) application. On November 1, 2007, in the absence of the submittal of further evidence sufficient to make positive findings concerning the application, the Community Development Coordinator issued a development order denying the application. The development order (copy attached) stated that positive findings could not be made with regard to the application, and the application was therefore denied based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.54 acre subject property is located at the southeast corner of Magnolia Drive and Bay Avenue; Community Development Board - January 15, 2008 APP2007-00003 - Page 3 0 • 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That there are no active Code Enforcement violations associated with the subject property; 4. That the request to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet requires that positive findings be made with regard to the Flexibility Criteria set forth in CDC Section 2-203.13; and 5. That the request to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet requires that positive findings be made with regard to the General Applicability Criteria set forth in CDC Section 3-913.A. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 2-203.B. La, in that a determination of the front setback.shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 2-203.13. Lc, in that the reduction in front setback shall be consistent with neighborhood character; 3. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 3-913.Ad1, in that the proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located; and 4. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 3-913.A.5, in that the proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. An appeal from the above Level One (flexible standard development) decision was filed on behalf of the property owner by J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC on November 8, 2007, consistent with the timeframe established for an appeal to be initiated in CDC Section 4-502.A. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-501.A.3, the Community Development Board (CDB) has the authority to hear appeals from Level One (flexible standard development) decisions. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-504.A, the CDB shall review the application, the recommendation of the Community Development Coordinator, conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing on the application, and render a decision in accordance with the provisions of CDC Section 4-206.D.5 granting the appeal, granting the appeal subject to specified conditions, or denying the appeal. It is noted that pursuant to CDC Section 4-504.13, in order to grant an appeal, overturning or modifying the decision appealed from, the CDB shall find that based on substantial competent evidence presented by the applicant or other party that each and every one of the following criteria are met: 1. The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of this development code; and 2. The decision of the CDB will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this development code; and 3. The decision of the CDB will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: .,i Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Development Order Issued on November 1, 2007 ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S:0anningDepartmentlCD BlFlex Standard (FLS)Unactive or Finished CasesWagnolia 0403 - Allen Residence (LMDR) Denied 11-01- 07Wagnolia 403 - Staff Report 01-15-08.doc Community Development Board - January 15, 2008 APP2007-00003 - Page 4 0 0 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 rbert.tefftAmvclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board - January 15, 2008 APP2007-00003 - Page 5 '.learwater e?Cy,onnect GIS y u 1a "° E Q i MDR FP JJ t4 (30 LDR N LMDR ? /Y ----- - - - - - -- -- -- -? O • r 9 0- 7 ! i ?t ------- g --------------- ---- 14 ------ - - ® - 0 fh s Scale: 1:2,395 ------- Map: 240848.18 , 1319104.04 ------ Image: 497, 9 D IRT Layers 0.411 Layers ? Planning Cases E-J Code Violations Occupational Licenses Permits Assisted Liong Facilities Prcbien-a*-ic Use Parcels Base Flap - k Pal Ce is A le '-) Cleanaa-er Addresses 1 Parcel Cen*_r0ids(' . _`]? ?.- Parcels Q? Roads and Bridges l) Railroads 0 Bridges(Y L? Fv-j 0 streets(' []CI Cleanv,ater Districts And Zon I J OAreas Cut of Clear:%a- L? FYJ 0 Clearv,,ater SerAce Arc ...D F--J 0 Neighborhood Dis*_ric*[ -LL) ED G Future Land UseQv ?Fe0Zonmg(' L) Fe- Pinellas County Ciril NJ 0 Shoreline L-1 FS 0 Pinellas County- Shading EJ- Aerial Photo [] fJ Aerial Photo 2006 Refresh Map fr lAuto Re es^ Palm Harbor East Lake Oldsmar Dunedin Safety Harbor Clearwater Cl Gel lsair Belleau Beach Largo Feather Sound O ruSted Site$ • 0- E-1 A http:,'publicgis,mydear,eater.com;•;:ebsitereConnectGIShvie•%er.htm Links ;.?Mwellarveous ._.)Planning _jv,eather M City Phone Listing #?GIS al 5 1 • • q 0AWE % jqw L t 1 • . r 2 1 r• .,..?? !. r r? r+ • r? O? 1 IF 1 STORY MASONRY ResIDENCE # 31Q a ?yww 49 w? L i r Alliff TV 4 Lot log," rIff • ? y .11?lNtrlr •?A •.e ?r? '19 FROM : DONALD KARCHER 1 4 4, o j f z .? 0 w r 7 1 FAX NO. : 72 f (1:s (u 1 Qz Lr4/ , %W w rem vo' !r? .. a p ?• ?,. I P 01- o 1 STORY -? . MASONRY 00 ? ,RESIOENCL •o x # 310 ,.?''W8 V )' I i' I'CM • X0.00' (P? . ,',?..vu ? ' ..I.. I r??n..»?•r?r.n.r......?rnytR•»Y..y?.r nw... ..... • I ? ». .ra,. .. ?. ?•.........•. rR ?e4?...1 M1\?? .w••.rR......,•u IITI•F» I !A ? ? n ' '?M...r. , ... y. .,Lw..... ?... ..n ?'•p"?Y•wr.r._•'7C711FL.n A yn:..r1w .Ar • ' o-.UN•L...: .. »Nrn.yn.....drrw...:. 1.•?\ q.dr.u.._;lr?. ...,p N,•••w. gqQ? 41r ?AY?A?NT I .., 20' ASPHALT - 65' RIGHT OF WAY 310 OTU9 ATM CLEARWATI . FAO Q k 33799 1.504 011W&PMON TN2 WOT 60 092T OF WT 136 ANN ?I'F!C VMT X10 F9V dP LOT 13f, COARNcTgo MAP OF HAFiDOR 0AK8. 411000AR19 114 PLAT d0w 3. PAQ11E St PVILle RBC+m3 of PIN@LI m COUNTY, KOROA I • ...I.I•. r.111..rr....iwuu'•I••+..•••nwJV•I I.N...MT• •.... aaNtN?crl?i ?«fIIV'EYINi? GfJMI'ANIr I Of TAMPA Vt. r ?.•A rwett i Aair wfaflor RGw BUM R 214 ANIMA, n.WtIWA 3WA I PHON40%W24l IP44 P?xq;tiM?'OeAa i !0000701 CERTIFIED TO: i I DORIS »• 0ANCRUNOFF W .Ls FARGo MORTGAGC 5u4w, • i'•,..E AG6, cy COMNQNWDLTW LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Wdetr:®T a???????rwt? na•? 003 TZ leW t10CA toIrt'0 ft j BASIS OF NEARIM: ! ASAt4MU AM NA380 ON, TM2 NOR1•M RI©N1' CF WAY i.iM1i 0?r Lo"Us Pxr4 WHIL•M a CLICNT REF EPtENCE NO.. 12-1 lIQ3»0 U`7t1JE TIAL LAND IURVICU. INC. 230 MaKCWEk CANE V MAN, 0 ir" 730113 FAIR 405 701-1027 mioN ' (+") 701-1 td0 1 env I H-aROW 1100 MC?P s 1b OLQI4147""ar, RIK .' rt h r%wr "iwwt.?e !Md r ??..? 9944 6SS 4Z4 : 'ON XU-1 URMOR'S CU IFICATE t2pNl9 It a PMPMW tow: Sunbolt 'title Agency snrv+oe You 0o Trwi JQe aRO$ s It ??LS ol?1c-asa TC HERCON MMUMWTICIR 61C T7«t -s CHAP M S1011U380 W01Sno W 121 CDB Meeting Date: December 18, 2007 Case Number: APP2007-00003 Agenda Item: G. 1. Appellant/Owner: Kiely M. Allen Agent: J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC. Address: 403 Magnolia Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: An appeal from a Level One (flexible standard development) decision pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Section 4-501.A.3, that a requested reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project is inconsistent with the Flexibility Criteria as set forth in CDC Sections 2-203.B.1.a and 2- 203.B.1.c, as well as, the General Standards for Level One Approvals as set forth in CDC Sections 3-913.A.1 and 3-913.A.5. CURRENT ZONING: Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY: Residential Urban (RU) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Detached Dwelling Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling EXISTING SURROUNDING North: LMDR Detached Dwelling ZONING AND USES: South: LMDR Detached Dwelling East: LMDR Detached Dwelling West: LMDR Detached Dwelling BACKGROUND: The 0.54-acre subject property is located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Drive and Bay Avenue within the Harbor Oaks subdivision. The property consists of a single-family detached dwelling that according to the Pinellas County Property Appraiser's Office was constructed in 1925, although the building and property have been subsequently updated/improved. On August 3, 2007, a Flexible Standard Development (FLS) application was submitted for a Residential Infill Project to allow an addition for the existing detached dwelling with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building). The applicant amended this request following the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting of September 6, 2007, changing the requested reduction from 10 feet to 20 feet. Following the amendment of the application, City staff conducted a review of the proposal and identified several issues. The review conducted by the Planning Department noted that pursuant to CDC Section 2- 203.B.1.a, a determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way. The application indicated that the proposal would be in keeping with the detached dwelling and privacy wall located 20 feet from the front property line on the abutting parcel to the east at 415 Magnolia Drive, as Community Development Board - December 18, 2007 APP2007-00003 - Page 1 well as the properties located at 314 and 322 Magnolia Drive. However, other than this statement no evidence was provided to substantiate the claim or indicate what those setbacks might be at 314 and 322 Magnolia Drive. As such, staff commented that further evidence needed to be provided "(such as a block survey) that the proposed building addition at a setback of 20 feet will be consistent with a regular/uniform setback already established by structures in the neighborhood". In addition to the above, the Planning Department also noted that pursuant to CDC Section 2-203.B.1.c, the reduction in front setback shall be consistent with neighborhood character. No evidence addressing this criterion other than that previously noted was provided in the application. As such, staff commented that evidence needed to be provided "(such as a block survey) that existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed at a setback consistent with the proposed 20-foot setback". On October 4, 2007, the DRC met with the property owner and designated agent for the subject development proposal to discuss the staff comments on the proposal. The Planning Department continents provided at the meeting identified certain criteria that needed to be satisfactorily addressed in for the application to be approved. Those comments further stated that the criteria needed to be addressed (through revised plans and/or application materials) by October 15, 2007 with a final determination on the application to be made no later than November 1, 2007. During the course of the meeting the owner/agent indicated that evidence in support of the reduced front setback had already been submitted to the case planner, who was not in attendance at the DRC meeting. This evidence was indicated as addressing the criteria set forth in CDC Sections 2-203.B.1.a, 2-203.B.1.b, and 2-203.B.1.c. The DRC mistakenly accepted this statement that evidence addressing the comments had been provided and while the owner/agent had provided evidence, it was, in fact, that same evidence that the comment was based upon. Upon being questioned by the agent, the DRC further indicated that the submittal of additional evidence to address those comments would not be necessary. Additionally, the DRC indicated to the owner/agent that following a consultation with the case planner, if there were no outstanding issues with the proposal, then a development order approving the application would be issued the next week. Subsequent to the DRC meeting, the evidence submitted by the owner/agent during the course of the meeting was reviewed by the case planner. The evidence was found to reference setbacks for the same three properties as the evidence having previously been submitted in the application with the addition of another property, 304 Magnolia Drive. However, the evidence on the new property was determined to be irrelevant to the request as it pertained to a five-foot high wall, the setbacks for which are governed by a different section of the Community Development Code. The evidence provided stated that there are three properties along Magnolia Drive with a setback of 20 feet; however there are 18 properties that front on Magnolia Drive (not including the subject property). The position of the Planning Department is that a 20-foot front setback for three of the 18 properties does not constitute a regular or uniform setback in the neighborhood that would support the request. In contrast, the evidence provided supported the position that a regular/uniform setback of 25 feet or greater had been established in the neighborhood and a reduced setback would be inconsistent with that setback as well as the character of the neighborhood. Therefore, on October 23, 2007, the Planning Department issued a letter to the designated agent for the project, that the information provided at the DRC meeting did not sufficiently address the Planning Department comments concerning the application, and further indicated that those comments needed to be sufficiently addressed prior to the issuance of a development order approving the application. Subsequently, the Planning Department staff discussed the letter of October 23rd with the agent as well as those events that transpired at the DRC meeting. It was relayed to the agent that while the DRC may have indicated that no further evidence was required, it was done in error due to confusion over what had already been provided by the owner/agent and what was actually being provided at the meeting. It was also relayed that even though the DRC may have indicated that the application was to be approved, it is not within the powers of the DRC to actually approve an application, and that the DRC only acts as a Community Development Board - December 18, 2007 APP2007-00003 - Page 2 • • recommending body to the Community Development Coordinator who is ultimately responsible for the approval or denial of a Level One (flexible standard development) application. On November 1, 2007, in the absence of the submittal of further evidence sufficient to make positive findings concerning the application, the Community Development Coordinator issued a development order denying the application. The development order (copy attached) stated that positive findings could not be made with regard to the application, and the application was therefore denied based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. That the 0.54 acre subject property is located at the southwest corner of Magnolia Drive and Bay Avenue; 2. That the subject property is located within the Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) District and the Residential Urban (RU) Future Land Use Plan category; 3. That there are no active Code Enforcement violations associated with the subject property; 4. That the request to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet requires that positive findings be made with regard to the Flexibility Criteria set forth in CDC Section 2-203.13; and 5. That the request to reduce the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet requires that positive findings be made with regard to the General Applicability Criteria set forth in CDC Section 3-913.A. Conclusions of Law: 1. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 2-203.13. La, in that a determination of the front setback shall consider the extent to which existing structures in the neighborhood have been constructed to a regular or uniform setback from the right-of-way; 2. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 2-203.B. Lc, in that the reduction in front setback shall be consistent with neighborhood character; 3. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 3-913.A.1, in that the proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located; and 4. That the development proposal is inconsistent with CDC Section 3-913.A.5, in that the proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. An appeal from the above Level One (flexible standard development) decision was filed on behalf of the property owner by J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC on November 8, 2007, consistent with the timeframe established for an appeal to be initiated in CDC Section 4-502.A. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-501.A.3, the Community Development Board (CDB) has the authority to hear appeals from Level One (flexible standard development) decisions. Pursuant to CDC Section 4-504.A, the CDB shall review the application, the recommendation of the Community Development Coordinator, conduct a quasi-judicial public hearing on the application, and render a decision in accordance with the provisions of CDC Section 4-206.D.5 granting the appeal, granting the appeal subject to specified conditions, or denying the appeal. It is noted that pursuant to CDC Section 4-504.B, in order to grant an appeal, overturning or modifying the decision appealed from, the CDB shall find that based on substantial competent evidence presented by the applicant or other party that each and every one of the following criteria are met: 1. The decision appealed from misconstrued or incorrectly interpreted the provisions of this development code; and Community Development Board - December 18, 2007 APP2007-00003 - Page 3 • • 2. The decision of the CDB will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this development code; and 3. The decision of the CDB will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: C Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: ? Development Order Issued on November 1, 2007 ? Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BlFlex Standard (FLS)Ilnactive or Finished CaseslMagnolia 0403 -Allen Residence (LMDR) Denied 11-01- 07Wagnolia 403 - Staff Report 12-18-07.doc Community Development Board - December 18, 2007 APP2007-00003 - Page 4 0 Robert G. Tefft 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 (727) 562-4539 robert.tefft(a),myclearwater.com PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Planner III City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida June 2005 to Present Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports, and making presentations to various City Boards and Committees. Planner II City of Clearwater, Clearwater, Florida May 2005 to June 2005 Duties include performing technical review of and preparation of staff reports for various land development applications, the organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Senior Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 2003 to May 2005 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional uses, rezonings, land use amendments, and text amendments. Organized data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Make presentations to various City Boards. Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida March 2001 to October 2003 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for land development applications such as, but not limited to: site plans, conditional use and text amendments. Organization of data and its display in order to track information and provide status reports. Provided in-depth training to the Assistant Planner position with respect to essential job functions and continuous guidance. Assistant Planner City of Delray Beach, Delray Beach, Florida October 1999 to March 2001 Performed technical review of and prepared staff reports for site plan development applications. Performed reviews of building permit applications. Provided information on land use applications, ordinances, land development regulations, codes, and related planning programs/services to other professionals and the public. EDUCATION • Bachelor of Arts, Geography (Urban Studies), University of South Florida, 1999 LICENSES & CERTIFICATES • American Planning Association Community Development Board - December 18, 2007 APP2007-00003 - Page 5 M1Y y • • CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, December 18, 2007, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont'd from 11-20-07) Peter Pan Developments, LLC., & Epic Holdings South (Petrit Meroli & Panayiotis Vasiloudes) are requesting Flexible Development approval to construct a 3,182 sq ft multi-use dock facility to provide 14 slips as an amenity to a proposed 16 unit attached dwelling (2 buildings with 8 dwelling units in each) in the Tourist (T) District with an increase to the length of the southern dock from 75% of the lot width (93.75 ft) to 89% of the lot width (111 ft) under the provisions of Sec. 3-601.C.3. (Proposed Use: Multi-use dock of 3,182 sq ft for 14 slips, in conjunction with a 16-unit attached dwelling (condominium) at 685, 689, 693 & 699 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 76, N & S Y2 of unplatted Blk 76 & Blk 77, Lots 12 & 13. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. FLD2007-03007 2. Clearwater Townhomes, Inc., William J., Jr. & Sharon J. Templeman, & Kathleen Hernandez are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit a Mixed Use (2 attached dwellings and 8 overnight accommodations [timeshares]) in the Tourist District where 10 attached dwellings (townhomes) were previously approved and constructed under FLD2002-11042, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec. 2-803.C; and (2) Termination of Status of Nonconformity to permit parking for overnight accommodations (timeshares) that are designed to back into the public right-of-way (previously approved as attached dwellings [townhomes]), under the provisions of Sec. 6-109. (Proposed Use: Mixed Use (2 attached dwellings and 8 overnight accommodations [timeshares]) at 161 Brightwater Dr., Island Townhomes, Lots 1-3 & 6-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2007- 11037 3. Kiely M. Allen is appealing a Level One (flexible standard development) decision pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Sec. 4-501.A.3, that a requested reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 20 ft (to building) as a Residential Infill Project is inconsistent with the Flexibility Criteria as set forth in CDC Secs. 2-203.13.1.a & 2-203.B.1.c, as well as, the General Standards for Level One Approvals as set forth in CDC Secs. 3-913.A.1 & 3-913.A.5. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 403 Magnolia Dr., Harbor Oaks Lots 84 & 86 & W 25ft of Lot 82. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. APP2007-00003 4. Peter L. & Paula J. Vosotas are appealing a Level One (flexible standard development) decision pursuant to Community Development Code (CDC) Sec. 4- 501.A.3, that a requested increase in the gross floor area of an accessory structure from 10% to 21.5% and an increase in the allowable height from 15 ft to 16.5 ft is inconsistent with the General Standards for Level One Approvals as set forth in CDC Secs. 3-913.A.1 & 3-913.A.5. (Proposed Use: Accessory Structure (detached 3 car garage) at 2849 Shady Oak Ct., Landmark Woods 2nd Add Lot 36. Assigned Planner: A. Scott Kurleman, Planner II. APP2007-00004 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, MMC Planning Director City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. To learn more about presenting to Clearwater boards and City Council, go to http://clearwater.aranicus.comNiewPublisher.phr)?view id=11 and click on "Resident Engagement Video." You can also check the informational video out from any Clearwater public library. Ad: 12/06/07 6P2007-00003; 67 0 402 JEFFORDS STREET LTD ALLEN, KIELY M ANDRIOLA, MICHAEL J 402 JEFFORDS ST 403 MAGNOLIA DR ANDRIOLA, JOANNA M CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3828 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 416 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 BARTON, RAYMOND T BATSON, ROBERT A BROWN, KENNETH P BARTON, PAMELA D BATSON, CYNTHIA BROWN, BRENDA 404 JASMINE WAY 2906 W BAYSHORE CT 423 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 TAMPA FL 33611 - 2808 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 CALLAHAN, JACK M SR CLAY, CHRISTINE CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS CALLAHAN, MARY L 424 LOTUS PATH COALITION JOE EVICH, PRESIDENT 409 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 P.O. BOX 8204 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 CLEARWATER, FL 33758 CLEARWATER PATHOLOGY ASSOC CONKLIN, LESLIE M CONNARD, MARK 416 JEFFORDS ST CONKLIN, DEBRA S CONNARD, JULIE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3828 430 LOTUS PATH 403 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 CRITCHLEY, JOSEPH E DADETTO, ALLAN J DAY, JERRY M 423 LOTUS PATH 331 LOTUS PATH DAY, KATHRYN T CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 306 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3820 DESAI, ANUP DRAZKOWSKI, MICHAEL DURKEE, KEITH W DESAI, CHHAYA DRAZKOWSKI, LINDA DURKEE, PHYLLIS L 908 S FORT HARRISON AVE PO BOX 413 416 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0413 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 DWORKIN, GARY H DYAS, GERALD P FOTIOU, ZACHARIAS DWORKIN, MARY L DYAS, MARY E FOTIOU, MERCEDES 415 MAGNOLIA DR 410 MAGNOLIA DR 428 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 FRITZ, ROBERT C FRITZ, ROBERT GATZA, JAMES W FRITZ, DONNA M FRITZ, DONNA GATZA, JULIE L 320 MAGNOLIA DR 323 LOTUS PATH 410 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 GREAT BRITAIN GENDUSA, SAMUEL J GOODMAN, SHERRY GUTHRIE, SARAH W GENDUSA, JOY 420 LOTUS PATH 1006 BAY AVE 414 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3811 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 HAKSAR, MANJULA HALE, JULIE B HARTLAGE, NANCY L HAKSAR, ELIZABETH 403 LOTUS PATH HARTLAGE, STEPHEN M 424 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 418 JEFFORDS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - HEMERICK, F DAVID HERIC, BLAINE R 902 S FORT HARRISON AVE HERIC, LAURA K CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 313 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 JACON, SHARON M CARON, EDWARD C 333 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 JONES, PETER D JONES, MARYLEE C 308 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 LAZANIS, JULIA M THE 415 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 MAGNOLIA MEDICAL CENTER LLC PO BOX 2893 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2893 MC DANIEL, ANDREA MC DANIEL, DAVID 1232 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4212 MEEK, DANIEL L 321 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 MITCHELL, JEFFREY C MITCHELL, JUDY A 327 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 PETRINI, RONALD A PETRINI, JUDY HESS 316 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3830 SABA, FADI E 2763 1 STAVE N ST PETERSBURG FL 33713 - 8723 LOWREY, CAROL E 314 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 MAGURNO, ELSIE A EST RR 2 BOX 280B ATHEN PA 18810 - 9646 MC DANIEL, PAULA MC DANIEL, QUAILYNN 315 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 MERIWETHER, RICHARD B JR MERIWETHER, MARY K 322 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3820 MORTON PLANT HOSP ASSN INC PO BOX 210 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210 RAULERSON, GRANT L RAULERSON, GENEVIEVE 409 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 SALTARELLI, CEDIO S SALTARELLI, MELBA R 322 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3830 0 HIGGINS, ELAINE P 315 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3819 JUDKIN, MATT & KIM LIVING TRUS 7110 E CAMBRIA CIR ORANGE CA 92869 - 2318 MAC NUTT, LAMAR A MAC NUTT, JANET B 322 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 MARTENS, DAVID C MARTENS, CANDACE S 425 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 MC QUIGG, MICHAEL C MC QUIGG, EUGENIA F 429 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 MILLS, LEILA R 311 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3819 PENNY, KENNETH E JR GOSCIN-PENNY, LEE 4598 CLEARWATER HARBOR DR LARGO FL 33770 - ROHRMANN, GEORGE F ROHRMANN, PAULINE M 400 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 SEYMOUR, PAUL SEYMOUR, AMY 400 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 SHEPPARD, PATRICK J SPENCER, ANGELA C TAM PARTNERS LLC 311 MAGNOLIA DR 316 JASMINE WAY 1 RED MILL LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DARIEN CT 06820 - 3612 TEMME, R WAYNE 421 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 WAGSTAFF, MARY LOU 418 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 • THOMAS, JOHN C THOMAS, WENDY H 1051 BAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3847 WICKERSHAM, HERBERT F WICKERSHAM, M ANN 428 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 16 TOLAN, DONALD J TOLAN, MAUREEN 417 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 W FROM :UTOPIA HOME CARE-NPR FAX NO. :7278418145 ?. 04 2007 10:08AM P2 SquirrelMail Page 1. of 2. Current Folder: INBOX ('om case Addresses Folders options, Search Help sign-out. SquirrelMai l . Meti,9a >e L.igt lldele Previous I Next 1?card L)YWard as Attactuhcnt Ke I Rc I A11 Subject: Oct 4th From: bfritz.utopiahomceare.com D t H Ir j' a e: Wed, October 3, 2007 10:03 t `=? t-, - e I. t: To: margarethightower(oyahoo.cohn Cc: robert.,tefft(g)myclearwa.tcr.com OCT 0 4 2007 ? Bec: - neil.thompson(a,)myclearwater.com _ Priority: .Nomial 1)EVELOPM N'f SEFtiJst;. ,y 9 ' Options: ?W rill I:1gpder Vi .w,Print file Vcrn'ott . Download tlli r r Iil?l' `? OF CLEARb?,'?,r'" , y Good evening Margret. (and Nathan) I will be in meetings in New Port. Richey tomorrow afternoon, and since we would not be allowed to "speak" an wa y y, Im not a difference. sure if attending will make Cedios letter was beautiful, and hits every point from the historical standpoint. I w,i.ll forward this a mail to Mr. Thompson in the morning, and call him as well to make sure lie knows our position. I will also make sure that our original letter is being considered in the discussions, as quite frankly, the RV parking/ storage and size of the overhead garage door to accommodate the RV would be a disaster to the neighboorhood "style". In my humble opinion, the overall, look of the project matches their house, however it is very large, and would take on the look of an additional house (with a. service station door, in clear view), as compared to a detached garage that simply accompanies the main home. According to Mr. Tefft, there have been slot of concern from neighbors, and according to him, nobody is in favor of this, Hopefully, the building department staff see. it the same way, Also, on a side note, regarding the historical status of Harbor Oaks, we really need to get busy mobilizing and making sure things (new homes) keep within a certain context and. style. (I have no idea why the City doesnt have an. architectural review Board) Im seeing nothing but marginal design lately, and it will cost eveyone in Harbor Oaks in the future, as the property values will go clown due to a lack of cohesiveness. Alan Dadetto expressed interest in getting involved, and I will, do the same. Any suggestions on how to proceed with this? Another thought. (concern) I have is that some of the neighborhood homes are in need of repair, and if you remember, my house on Lotus was cited for "cosmetic" reasons, and I had to explain to the City that I was demolishing it to build a new home. Where's the enforcement of that rule .lately? Regards Bob and Donna ttp://matri xws.com/webmail/sre/read-. _body,php?mai 1box=1NB0X&passed_id-903 &start... 1.0/4/2007 ?' 'rvv SEP 2 8 2007 C L E A R W A T ICES RVICr:SOP 'EST 0 R I D A L__CITY pF CLEARWATER =HARE . Q_ j R OAKS ASSOCIATION September 27, 2007 City of Clearwater Planning Department City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33756-4748 Re: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 403 MAGNOLIA DRIVE (FLS 2007-08041) Attn: Michael L. Delk, Director Dear Sir: Regarding the application for Flexible Standard Development 403 Magnolia Drive, Clearwater, FL for an addition to an existing single family detached dwelling with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) as per section 2-203B of the community development code. Historic Harbor Oaks is a zoned R-1 single family residential. The Harbor Oaks Association and its membership have over the years vigorously opposed any attempt to change or infringe on the single family R-1 residential zoning and character of Historic Harbor Oaks. It has taken years of concerted effort on the part of Harbor Oaks Association members in cooperation with the City of Clearwater Board of Commissioners and City Employees to establish and obtain registration of Harbor Oaks in the National Register of Historic Places. WE HAVE BEEN INFORMED BY MR. ROBERT JONES, A HISTORIC SITE SPECIALIST WITH THE PRESERVATION BUREAU OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, THAT A VARIANCE COULD RESULT IN A DWELLING BEING DESIGNATED AS NON-CONTRIBUTORY TO THE HISTORIC DISTRICT. VARIANCES MAY THEN CAUSE THE LOSS OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR HARBOR OAKS. D E D I C A T E D T 0 N E I G H B 0 R H 0 0 D B E T T E R M E N T i • • ?YIr' Any deviation from the requirements of the single family R-1 residential designation and set backs in conformance to the zoning code cannot be viewed as anything other than detrimental to the character and ambiance of our historic neighborhood and will distract from the significant Historical District designation in the National Register of Historic Places. The Harbor Oaks Association requests that the application be denied and respectfully solicit the support of the Board of Commissioners and the City of Clearwater in our endeavor to preserve and protect Historic Harbor Oaks and its listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Yours sincerely, Harbor Oaks Association ////?----- Cedio S. Saltarelli President CC: Honorable Frank Hibbard - Mayor Honorable John Doran - Vice Mayor Honorable George N. Cretekos - Councilmember Honorable A. Petersen - Councilmember Honorable Paul F. Gibson - Councilmember 0 • CLEARWATER HISTORICAL SOCIETY, INC. PLUMB HOUSE MUSEUM 1380 SOUTH MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 175 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33757 tIrtai 1896 Sept.25,2007 Re :Notice of filing an application for flexible standard Development Approval at 403 Magnolia Drive(FLS2007-08041) Dear Mayor and Commissioners: At a Sept. l01h Board of Directors' meeting the Clearwater Historical Society unanimously voted to oppose the request for a reduction to the front (north) from a 25 ft. setback to a 20ft setback as a residential infill project at 409 Magnolia Avenue. It is paramount that the Harbor Oaks Neighborhood, as the first National Register Historic District in Pinellas County, set an example of preserving the character of its neighborhood wherever possible. Periodic changes in the requirements of R-1 Single family residential zoning could set a bad precedent in the future for altering original facades as they relate historic architecture on the front or sides of properties in Harbor Oaks. Recently, there have been examples of new construction infill which has not been compatible in terms of side setbacks with surrounding properties. It is urged, therefore, that the single family R-1 residential zoning that the Harbor Oaks Association has fought so hard to preserve over the years be upheld by the City Planning Department and the Development Review Committee. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely`, /-,? Mike Sanders Clearwater Historical Society Robert G. Tefft, Planner II1 Cc: edlo-S---9aftare1li " `- -J? 6 0 425 Lotus Path Clearwater, FL 33756 tember 21, 2007 Mr. Robert G. TeM Planner tR Clearwater Planning Department Ciy of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL33758 - 4748 RE: Application for Flexible Standard Development (?a 403 Magnolia Drive (FLS2007 - QRO4t Dear Mr. Tefft: This letter is in reply to your second notice regarding the above application for a front setback in the Harbor Oaks neighborhood. In this case the setback requested is from 25 -feet-to-20-feet. Harbor Oaks has beeft a. eighbo hood in-Clearwater for- many, many decades. One of the things that makes it special is that all the homes sit back from the front property line at least 25 feet if not more. This is a most desirable situation and should not be char I am asking that you deny the above application. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. ZDav _ e s ( Firs m ed to Harbor Oaks in 1945.) DCMfdm q FROM :UTOPIA HOME CARE-NPR N0mf'-"PA , IN_C. Ca:rrng ?[rr YGU 1_U;c FFmil'r'"' • FAX NO. :7278418145 '1'7S'w, u trlnlah Din eca re. corn .562? US I9, Suite 3.0; Ne-w PO { c,.11c? . FL 3 65:2 (72 i) 841-9050 p.l o.1.le (727) 84 '14- FAX CO VER H NEW PO RTC ?Y ? ?'. I?ZTIO?T3 I ::`(' 841-81 OCT 4 2007 DA1.G;?j'o? ??? . I lJt=i?l:t_l•iKNi..1Y.! SCRVIi?4:` ? --Y OF CLEARWAYFIR WF AR-E TIZANS.HITT7NG WAGE (S); TIH PAGE LNCLIlDj;D P .,LEASE DELIVER T11, ATTACW,b DOCUMENT (?) TO: Ni l. 'TI.??n.IdsG.,_? DEPAitT__MFNT; COMPANY: FAX #: f TRANSMITTED BY- t (] A1?ENT') RTNU4IWS: Lam.-r..? CONFIDE -FOP The documents accampanyi.ng this tr?.nsmis5inn may eon.tai.n con.;Rdehtial health information privileged. This ilifbrmation is intwded only for the use of the indil'idu,al or enti t'S' named shote. The. that is 1.e d authorized - recipient of this information is prohibited from disclosing this infot•matio.u to any other parr, unless 1, . ? y so by law or regulation Rn.d i,s required to destroy the infb2'ma-don after its stated need has Preen fulfilled, cd to do uir If you are ilot: the inte.uded recipient, you are hereby notified that any, d'isclosL?re, co -ing di taken in reliance on the conten'tY of these documents is strictl - PS br stribution, or action error, please notif;, the sender inimedistely and arrange 'for 3 the. return or Prohibited, ,yr,u luia ull Of tb thes8S ed this information in • c ?leStru ctie docnrucnts. URCr,b . 04 2007 10:08AM P1 R,cvision pate 1/0., ??lU l J 10/0^ _ _ _ 11 0 C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 13, 2007 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 403 MAGNOLIA DRIVE (FLS2007-08041) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 403 Magnolia Drive, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that a revised application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development approval for an addition to an existing single-family detached dwelling with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 20 feet (to building) as per Section 2-2033 of the Community Development Code. On October 4, 2007, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be October 4, 2007. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.tefftL&myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on October 4, 2007. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tefft@myel.earwater.com FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 402 JEFFORDS STREET LTD 402 JEFFORDS ST 'CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3828 CLEARWATER PATHOLOGY ASSOC 416 JEFFORDS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3828 402 JEFFORDS STREET LTD 402 JEFFORDS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3828 TEMME, R WAYNE 421 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 TAM PARTNERS LLC 1 RED MILL LN DARIEN CT 06820 - 3612 LAZANIS, JULIA M THE 415 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 CALLAHAN, JACK M SR CALLAHAN, MARY L 409 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 MERIWETHER, RICHARD B JR. MERIWETHER, MARY K 322 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3820 MILLS, LEILA R 311 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3819 0402 JEFFORDS STREET LTD •HARTLAGE, NANCY L 402 JEFFORDS ST HARTLAGE, STEPHEN M CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3828 418 JEFFORDS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - SABA, FADI E 2763 1 ST AVE N ST PETERSBURG FL 33713 - 8723 MORTON PLANT HOSP ASSN INC PO BOX 210 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210 MORTON PLANT HOSP ASSN INC PO BOX 210 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210 WAGSTAFF, MARY LOU 418 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3 822 DURKEE, KEITH W DURKEE, PHYLLIS L 416 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 GATZA, JAMES W GATZA, JULIE L 410 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 BARTON, RAYMOND T BARTON, PAMELA D 404 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 HIGGINS, ELAINE P 315 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3819 DAY, JERRY M DAY, KATHRYN T 306 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3820 HEMERICK, F DAVID 902 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 TAM PARTNERS LLC 1 RED MILL LN DARIEN CT 06820 - 3612 TOLAN, DONALD J TOLAN, MAUREEN 417 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 CONNARD, MARK CONNARD, JULIE 403 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 ROHRMANN, GEORGE F ROHRMANN, PAULINE M 400 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 SPENCER, ANGELA C 316 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRAZKOWSKI, MICHAEL DRAZKOWSKI, LINDA PO BOX 413 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0413 JUDKIN, MATT & KIM LIVING DESAI, ANUP DESAI, ANUP TRUS DESAI, CHHAYA DESAI, CHHAYA 7110 E CAMBRIA CIR 908 S FORT HARRISON AVE 908 S FORT HARRISON AVE ORANGE CA 92869 - 2318 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 MAGNOLIA MEDICAL CENTER LLC 'PO BOX 2893 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2893 HAKSAR, MANJULA HAKSAR, ELIZABETH 424 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 DYAS, GERALD P DYAS, MARY E 410 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 ALLEN, KIELY M 403 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 MC DANIEL, PAUL A MC DANIEL, QUAILYNN 315 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 HERIC, BLAINE R HERIC, LAURA K 313 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 PENNY, KENNETH E JR GOSCIN-PENNY, LEE 4598 CLEARWATER HARBOR DR LARGO FL 33770 - WICKERSHAM, HERBERT F WICKERSHAM, M ANN 428 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 CRITCHLEY, JOSEPH E 423 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 OFOTIOU, ZACHARIAS FOTIOU, MERCEDES 428 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756- 3838 BROWN, KENNETH P BROWN, BRENDA 423 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 DWORKIN, GARY H D W ORKIN, MARY L 415 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 SEYMOUR, PAUL SEYMOUR, AMY 400 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 FRITZ, ROBERT C FRITZ, DONNA M 320 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 JONES, PETER D JONES, MARYLEE C 308 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 CONKLIN, LESLIE M CONKLIN, DEBRA S 430 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 CLAY, CHRISTINE 424 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 ANDRIOLA, MICHAEL J ANDRIOLA, JOANNA M 416 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 OMC QUIGG, MICHAEL C MC QUIGG, EUGENIA F 429 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 GENDUSA, SAMUEL J GENDUSA, JOY 414 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 BATSON, ROBERT A BATSON, CYNTHIA 2906 W BAYSHORE CT TAMPA FL 33611 - 2808 MAC NUTT, LAMAR A MAC NUTT, JANET B 322 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 LOWREY, CAROL E 314 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 SHEPPARD, PATRICK J 311 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 MARTENS, DAVID C MARTENS, CANDACE S 425 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 GOODMAN, SHERRY 420 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 MAGURNO, ELSIE A EST RR 2 BOX 280B ATHEN PA 18810 - 9646 MC DANIEL, ANDREA RAULERSON, GRANT L THOMAS, JOHN C MC DANIEL, DAVID RAULERSON, GENEVIEVE THOMAS, WENDY H 1232 JASMINE WAY 409 LOTUS PATH 1051 BAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4212 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3847 HALE, JULIE B .103 LOTUS PATH *CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 DADETTO, ALLAN J 331 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 FRITZ, ROBERT FRITZ, DONNA 323 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 &UTHRIE, SARAH W 1006 BAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3811 SALTARELLI, CEDIO S SALTARELLI, MELBA R 322 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3830 MEEK, DANIEL L 321 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc. 320 Magnolia Drive Clearwater, Fl; 33756 Pres. Bob Fritz Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition PO Box 8204 Clearwater, F133758 Pres. Joe Evich SACON, SHARON M CARON, EDWARD C 333 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 MITCHELL, JEFFREY C MITCHELL, JUDY A 327 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 PETRINI, RONALD A PETRINI, JUDY HESS 316 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3830 FLS2007-08041 Robert Tefft PLANNING DEPARTMENT September 10, 2007 Cedio Saltarelli, President Harbor Oaks Association 322 Lotus Path Clearwater, FL 33756 - 3830 Re: FLS2007-08041 Dear Mr. Saltarelli: C? i CITY OF CLEARWAT°ER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 I am in receipt of your letter dated August 27 regarding the above referenced development application. Please be advised that in its present form, the matter is not supportable by staff. The applicant has indicated their desire to continue the matter till the October 4, 2007, DRC meeting in order to consider further revisions to the application. Harbor Oaks is one of Clearwater's most beautiful and unique neighborhoods. Its designation in the National Register is a testament to that fact. Notwithstanding this designation, the district does not have any definitive design guidelines that protect this unique character. That is something that the association may want to discuss for the future. I would be happy to discuss this with you and the association at such time as you determine that there is sufficient desire to'do so. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this or any other matter of importance to Harbor Oaks. Sincerely, Michael eIJ lk, A CP Cc: ?-William Horne, City Manager Robert Tefft, Planner III FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILIIEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" now WaVED RE: 403 Magnolia Drive ?'=4 6 2007 Jig ATTN: Robert G. Tefft Planner III , ?? ' pl?i1N ?3EP??Ta?lEM C11Y 0FCL MWAJER CW? -111 -10 Dear Mr. Tefft I had the opportunity to review the proposed plans for 403 Magnolia Drive, and am glad that the Planning Department shares the view of the neighborhood association that the request is much too aggressive, and will be denied. In reviewing the plans, what struck me the most is the intention of storing an RN on the property. The plans clearly show an RN parking space and the oversized garage door that would allow access into the garage. I must go on record that I adamantly oppose this. In my opinion, storing (parking) an RN in a residential neighborhood (Harbor Oaks or any neighborhood) is outrageous. It deters from the overall feeling of a "neighborhood", and takes on more of a "repair shop" look. There are storage facilities and commercial garages available within the City to store RN's and oversized boats. Harbor Oaks, or any other neighborhood, is not the place. The inclusion of the RN garage on this project will reduce the intrinsic value of our neighborhood, as well as the overall values of the properties within the neighborhood. You had mentioned that the owners would be within their rights to construct the project as designed, as long as they meet the setback requirements. I implore you, and your staff to visit a similar "garage" project on Old Coachman Rd. and you will clearly see what an eyesore that is. Although the plans indicate similar materials are to be used as on the main residence, the oversized garage door and the RN parking would be a catastrophe. I do not want that in my neighborhood, and your staff can certainly prevent it from happening. I am certain that the entire Harbor Oaks neighborhood will agree with my concerns. The truth is, the average citizen can not interpret the plans and render a decision one way or the other; they simply do not understand "how it will look" until it's much too late and it's been built. Harbor Oaks is neighborhood built on pride and respect for our fellow neighbors. Please do not allow this to happen. We, the undersigned neighbors vigorously oppose the application for the reasons set forth in this letter. R. Nathan Hil Margaret a3 Robert C. ri Donna M. Fr Carol Lowrey Allan Dadetto 0 August 28, 2007 Mr. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Development Review Committee City of Clearwater P. O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758 - 4748 Is 425 Lotus Path Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: Application for Flexible Standard Development at 403 Magnolia Drive (FLS2007 - 08041) Dear Mr. Tefft: As residents of Harbor Oaks we object to the above Application for a reduction in the front setback from 25 feet to 10 feet. Harbor Oaks is a wonderful old neighborhood in Clearwater that is listed on the Historical Register. Any attempt to encroach on the existing front setback of 25 feet would damage the beautiful vistas that are present in our neighborhood. We ask that you reject the above application. Sincerely, Can a S. Martens David C. Martens RE ?EIVEp AUG 3 i 2007 PLANNING'-D' EPARUNT. CITY OF CLEARWAiER It 0 "29 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT C L E A R W A TIr? ERVI?Es F L O R ` D A r CLEARWATER 1 H AR B W R A. IV" w OAKS ASSOCIATION August 27, 2007 City of Clearwater Planning Department City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748 Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Re: Notice of FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 403 MAGNOLIA DRIVE (FLS 2007-0804) Attn: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Dear Sir: Regarding the application for Flexible Standard Development 403 Magnolia Drive, Clearwater, FL for an addition to an existing single family detached dwelling with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building) as a residential infill project as per section 2-203B of the community development code. Historic Harbor Oaks is a zoned R-1 single family residential. The Harbor Oaks Association and its membership have over the years vigorously opposed any attempt to change or infringe on the single family R-1 residential zoning and character of Historic Harbor Oaks. It has taken years of concerted effort on the part of Harbor Oaks Association members in cooperation with the City of Clearwater Board of Commissioners and City Employees to establish and obtain registration of Harbor Oaks in the National Register of Historic Places. Any deviation from the requirements of the single family R-I residential designation and set backs in conformance to the zoning code cannot be viewed as anything other than detrimental to the character and ambiance of our historic neighborhood and will distract from the significant Historical District designation in the National Register of Historic Places. DEDICATED TO NEIGHBORHOOD BETTERMENT 1 • 0 The Harbor Oaks Association, its Officers, Directors and membership request that the application be denied and respectfully solicit the support of the Board of Commissioners and the City of Clearwater in our endeavor to preserve and protect Historic Harbor Oaks and its listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Yours sincerely, Harbor Oaks Association Cedio S. Saltarelli President CC: Honorable Frank Hibbard - Mayor Honorable John Doran - Vice Mayor Honorable George N. Cretekos - Councilmember Honorable A. Petersen - Councilmember Honorable Paul F. Gibson - Councilmember • • CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 15, 2007 RE: NOTICE OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 403 MAGNOLIA DRIVE (FLS2007-08041) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 500 feet of 403 Magnolia Drive, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application has been submitted for Flexible Standard Development approval for an addition to an existing single-family detached dwelling with a reduction to the front (north) setback from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building) as a Residential Infill Project as per Section 2-203.B of the Community Development Code.. On September 6, 2007, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. Following that review and determination, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be September 6, 2007. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.tefftL?,Lnyclearwatencom for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case, which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on September 6, 2007. An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.mycleanvater.com. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 E-Mail: robert.tefft&)Lnyclearwater.com FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 402 JEFFORDS STREET 402 JEFFORDS S 0.0 CLEA FL 33756 - 3828 CLEARWATER PATHOLOGY ASSOC 416 JEFFORDS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3828 402 JEFFORDS STREET 402 JEFFORD TER FL 33756 - 3828 TEMME, R WAYNE 421 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 TAM PARTNERS LLC 1 RED MILL IN DARIEN CT 06820 - 3612 LAZANIS, JULIA M THE 415 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 CALLAHAN, JACK M SR CALLAHAN, MARY L 409 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 MERIWETHER, RICHARD B JR MERIWETHER, MARY K 322 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3820 MILLS, LEILA R 311 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3819 402 JEFFORDS STgjFBT LTD 402 JEFFO CLE ATER FL 33756 - 3828 SABA, FADI E 2763 1 STAVE N ST PETERSBURG FL 33713 - 8723 MORTON PLANT HOSP ASSN INC PO BOX 210 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210 WAGSTAFF, MARY LOU 418 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 DURKEE, KEITH W DURKEE, PHYLLIS L 416 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 GATZA, JAMES W GATZA, JULIE L 410 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 BARTON, RAYMOND T BARTON, PAMELA D 404 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 HIGGINS, ELAINE P 315 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3819 DAY, JERRY M DAY, KATHRYN T 306 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3820 fARTLAGE, NANCY L HARTLAGE, STEPHEN M 418 JEFFORDS ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - MORTON PLANT HOSP ASSN INC PO BOX 210 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210 HEMERICK, F DAVID 902 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 TAM PARTNERS LLC 1 RED MILL IN DARIEN CT 06820 - 3612 TOLAN, DONALD J TOLAN, MAUREEN 417 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 CONNARD, MARK CONNARD, JULIE 403 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821 ROHRMANN, GEORGE F ROHRMANN, PAULINE M 400 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822 SPENCER, ANGELA C 316 JASMINE WAY CLEARWATER FL 33756 - DRAZKOWSKI, MICHAEL DRAZKOWSKI, LINDA PO BOX 413 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0413 JUDKIN, MATT & KIM LIVING DESAI, ANUP DESAI, ANUP TRUS DESAI, CHHAYA DESAI, CHHAYA 7110 E CAMBRIA CIR 908 S FORT HARRISON AVE 908 S FORT HARRISON AVE ORANGE CA 92869 - 2318 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904 MAGNOLIA MEDICAL CENTER LLC PO BOX 2893 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 2893 HAKSAR, MANJULA HAKSAR, ELIZABETH 424 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 DYAS, GERALD P DYAS, MARY E 410 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 ALLEN, KIELY M 403 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 MC DANIEL, PAUL A MC DANIEL, QUAILYNN 315 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 HERIC, BLAINE R HERIC, LAURA K 313 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 PENNY, KENNETH E JR GOSCIN-PENNY, LEE 4598 CLEARWATER HARBOR DR LARGO FL 33770 - WICKERSHAM, HERBERT F WICKERSHAM, M ANN 428 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 CRITCHLEY, JOSEPH E 423 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 toTIOU, ZACHARIAS FOTIOU, MERCEDES 428 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 BROWN, KENNETH P BROWN, BRENDA 423 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 DWORKIN, GARY H DWORKIN, MARY L 415 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 SEYMOUR, PAUL SEYMOUR, AMY 400 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 FRITZ, ROBERT C FRITZ, DONNA M 320 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 JONES, PETER D JONES, MARYLEE C 308 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 CONKLIN, LESLIE M CONKLIN, DEBRA S 430 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 CLAY, CHRISTINE 424 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 ANDRIOLA, MICHAEL J ANDRIOLA, JOANNA M 416 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 OC QUIGG, MICHAEL C MC QUIGG, EUGENIA F 429 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837 GENDUSA, SAMUEL J GENDUSA, JOY 414 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 BATSON, ROBERT A BATSON, CYNTHIA 2906 W BAYSHORE CT TAMPA FL 33611 - 2808 MAC NUTT, LAMAR A MAC NUTT, JANET B 322 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 LOWREY, CAROL E 314 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3836 SHEPPARD, PATRICK J 311 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3835 MARTENS, DAVID C MARTENS, CANDACE S 425 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 GOODMAN, SHERRY 420 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832 MAGURNO, ELSIE A EST RR 2 BOX 280B ATHEN PA 18810 - 9646 MC DANIEL, ANDREA RAULERSON, GRANT L THOMAS, JOHN C MC DANIEL, DAVID RAULERSON, GENEVIEVE THOMAS, WENDY H 1232 JASMINE WAY 409 LOTUS PATH 1051 BAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 4212 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3847 HALE, JULIE B 403 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3831 DADETTO, ALLAN J 331 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 FRITZ, ROBERT FRITZ, DONNA 323 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 0 THRIE, SARAH W GU 1006 BAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3811 SALTARELLI, CEDIO S SALTARELLI, MELBA R 322 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3830 MEEK, DANIEL L 321 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 Clearwater Neighborhood Coalition PO Box 8204 Clearwater, F133758 President Joe Evich Harbor Oaks Neighborhood Assoc 320 Magnolia Drive Clearwater, F133756 President Bob Fritz 'ACON, SHARON M CARON, EDWARD C 333 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 MITCHELL, JEFFREY C MITCHELL, JUDY A 327 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3829 PETRINI, RONALD A PETRINI, JUDY HESS 316 LOTUS PATH CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3830 FLS2007-08041 r SURVEY THE WEST 25.00 FEET OF LOT 82 AND ALL OF LOT 84 AND LOT 86, CORRECTED MAP OF HARBOR OAKS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 56 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SAID PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "X" ACCORDING TO FLOOD MAP 3125096 0015 D, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA. CERTIFIED TO: KIELEY M. ALLEN. ORIGINAL RECEIVER SEP 12 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Y U m?L o? L m` in 10 J? Z 1 It hU W z 0 ?a 3 Y a 14.60' SURVEYED 5119106 ERROR OF CLOSURE 7:19.000 SUBJECT TO A! AND ALL cASEGit7li7s OF RECORD. /VO7 E.' THIS SURVEY IS /VOTE: THIS SURVEY IS FOR THIS SURVEY WAS DONE WITHOUT BENEFIT OF TITLE THE EXCLUSIVE USE of rHE SEARCH. NOT COVERED BY PURCHREAr ASERS MORTGAGE OR SURVEY NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED, DWED AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILIT)o GUARANTOR OF 77TLE FOR A EMOOSSED WITH A SEAL. INSURANCE PER/OD OF ONE YEAR AND BOUNDARYSURVEY THE SURVEY BEARINGS (IF SHOWN) ARE BASED ON RECORD PLAT JpB 07-003 DA2., 5130106 DRAWJVBY.• GFK SCALE: 1%- 30 LEGEND p O SIR: SET IRON ROD W /CAP 136 SOY SET CONCRETE (D DEEDED (P)PLAT 0 ; FIR. FOUND IRON ROD (YMEASURED (c) CALCULATED ¦ • FM FOUND CONCRETE MMENT M F It RK.NT-CF-WAY C/D CONCRETE CURB • . OUND IRON PIPE FPP; FOUND PINCHED PIPE C/W CCrCRETE WALK 9/0 BACK TD BACK CO CBS CONCRETE BLOCK CONCRETE BLOCK 3 STUCCO CHAIN LINK E R/E RECORDED EASEMENT ?i„ N ?(•• PVF SND LYVN FENCE SET NAIL d DISK /SiJB ?N(// SAT NUMBER SL SURVEY LINE S/T SURVLY TACK BY: w *N _ rowsH/P 29 RANGE - VO/D 777EREAF7ER. GO"ONF. KILLION ? ? SURVEYOR 1747 WINFIELDROADNORTH CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 337M PHONE.- (727) 443-7067 FAX: ('727) 4434424 GORDONF. JW"ON ' / FLORIDA STATE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. MS. 1,) C MAGNOLIA DRIVE L (ASPHALT 21.25' BACK TO BACK) ' .. ir? .:.'?y bt' R . ? ?? i C 1 1 "3 t.. 7 f -?l ? ,,?? f rflx b? ? ? ?; ?; ?i r, ? s ? v t$ r???? i. t ast': ?? Ce I ? 1 ¢? j 14 .A i._.b i 41 e • h 4 4 1 mks ry i? +?.i?W l«:?:ld.uC•? < ,dZ! ?.,'".+?d?sw.?? 1? +$Jltir,?r?$i ?.:.. eA,en b A Y A41V°t. .1 ' .. -% a G ? Y •Y.r H .Y3 • ? ? t MIC, _ f . t 9?I ' z Y ?4. L {s t t '?? vie . ' ??`+ 13s? y ??i 4 1?`?? C+?? •'f} r r ? ?,rtr 6 +Ht ?, ? Y S ytf f r d r y?,. ?` ?y? - . ? h% W. Jj ?y) `r.vc $j kryF ' 4 A 1 9 ?A + ?. a W-L, Mt 1 ' ra L ? s ,c - SUR VEY SE TOWNSHIP 29 RANGE THE WEST 25.00 FEET OF LOT 82 AND ALL OF LOT 84 AND LOT 86, CORRECTED MAP OF HARBOR OAKS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 56 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SAID PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "X" ACCORDING TO FLOOD MAP 3125096 0015 D, CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA. CERTIFIED TO: KIELEY M. ALLEN. C MAGNOLIA DRIVE L (ASPHALT 21.25' BACK TO BACK) 6 "CONCRETE CURB 00 BEAR/ G BASIS (ASSU ) N90'00100 E (M ? 180.00' (M 4.5' N 1 . CM )70 00' (P) 25.0(0) m IT) BRICK DRIVE 0 41 U O LOT 84 N U 0 M 0 tf) 0 O .50 y V .3 w 68.85' to \ w ?n 29.02' w S OR FRA N 6' PVC FENCE / HOUSE #403 J J 29. 13' 68.66' (\O W 1.4 •/' \ QP J Q O 0 LOT' 86 o0i •• \v? QP) Q: N ?h 3 w v 0 N 0 5 \o 1 D /0 0 m Z g Z O N m ?. . m 9.0 N \v? a-50 N N ? 85.00' P 70.00' (P) 25.0'(0) 14.60' FCM .S90'00'00 "W (M) 6' ISERGLASS FENCE 180.0 (M) 1?p •• 4 "x4 " LOT 12 1 B LOT 12 to LOT 119 SURVEYED 5119106 ERROR OF CLOSURE 1:19.000 SUBJECT 7o ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. NOTE: THIS SURVEY IS NOTE- THIS SURVEY IS FOR THIS SURVEY WAS DONE WITHOUT BENEFIT OF 777LE THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE SEARCH. NOT COVERED BY CURRENT OWNERS, PURCHASERS A40RTGAGE OR SURVEY NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED, a47ED AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY' GUANTOR OF TITLE FOR A EMBOSSED W77H A SEAL. INSURANCE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AND VOID THEREAFTER. BOUM"YSURVEY GORDONF. KILLION THE SURVEY BEARINGS (IF SHOWN) ARE BASED ON RECORD PLAT JOBP 07-003 DATA' 5130106_ DRAW/VBY.' GFK SC4L11" 1- 30 .174.# TA, LEGEND C? ,P&01 Z- 7#67, r SIR: SET IRON ROD w//c?w //33tse (p)DEEDED (P) PLAT FA l S SCI; SET CONCRETE GONINiENT (M)MEASURED (C)CA.CULATED ' • FTR: FOUND IRON ROD R//ww RKiR-OF-VAY G7 T s W. + ?Q LC r. ¦ FCM: FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT CC CONCRETE CONCRETE ? • FOIN ID IRON POPE V f° { k 7e • FPP FOUND PINCHED PIPE B/B RACK TO BACK CBS CONCRETE CHAIN LINK B?& STUCCO FVE RECORDED EASEMENT ,? . PV7F POLYVINYL FENCE MASONRY PLANTER w Sr0 SET NAL a DISK /313e VN 'M wu ETC NUMBER GORDONF. 4N ~ \ SL SURVEY LINE S/T SURVEY TACK FLORIDA STATE PROFESSIONAL LAID.SU NO. 13B` EXHIBIT A 3 8 a., I / I Q Ay'C IWWI I/ ..... t E,cF?rlur? ?5.9 IcE LAFVi. V•4L 0 I i IA I I / I I ? I I I? i I -- -- k' - ----- - ------ T - - - -ePaa.t RNe?F{ 4' ?Hlgc. '? caiv ? ?V ? cscp ? r\etNP cN Wa;. \ ut,? eMM1k ? Z a? ' . xanl_ IIRIGIJL fiM9v?S 11 _ INE WEST 15.00 rEEr OF LOf 8Z ANO ALL OF LOr 84 AND LOr CB, CORRECTED MAP OF IIARRCIR OAKS, AS REGOROEo rN L. o BOOK J, PAGE 56 OF THE PUBLIC R£COTiOS OF PINELUS COUNT); fLORIOI 5UB.lECr TB ANY ANO ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SAIp PROPEf. rY FALLS NN /HIN FL 000 ZONE ?.- AGCORU/NG r0 FLOOD MAP :Sf?9096 DOI, 0. CLTY OF CLEARWATEA, FLOR/OA. CERNFIEO TO' BIAXJER & SrROMAUER, COMMONIVCA(IN LAND rITLC SURANCE COMfjj r, KIECEY N ALLEN. THIS SURVEY N.15 GONE lvlMOUr INf BENE' pF A TITLE SEARCH. THIS SURVEY 11 NOT VALID LNLE55 SICNEO.DAI'EE ANO EMBOSSED WIrH SEAL. THE SURVEY Oe, PlcrEO HERE IS NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAL LIAO/LIII' INSURANCE. IeE7a2Qm) II II, W' W n? j 8 ZONING 6r o2 g MINIMUM ZONING APPROVED BUILDINGpSETBACK -FR zt CITY OF CLEARWATER STREET PLANNING EPARTMENT SIDE s` BY DATE_ sr.•e7 ID-o" , y n '1 APPROVY0 -? CITY OFF C LE.4RWAiER ct'? ® (`, PUBL1YEOBBS AO?IRISiRAT,I,ONy-. N By: C%I? \i B? nti-I'9-dl t K I PI C? .' {4Ll IMfMV?-A4AIT-5 7-11 R? TL+IA, -P'-r- 11 ? troSM??-A W \\I lj61FT-uv-WAY PE2 LI-A SPEuFIU4T10 n11. '° /? I D4.A-AS ?i 9.0 t' nIN PERMIT '17-003-0Z4. n Tee m ,., ? IE 3 II I l o LIdSd _? orl 70 01 4.0" _,?\ swN L sen M? . '? _ MAN 0 7 2007 DEVEIOPUENI LEAVIC ES DEPT T = _ CITY OF CLEPAWAfEA 403 MAGNOLIA DR ?h3 'cr ?? M??? ?l? I BCP2002-02573A T'?ex (! ?cea uN R?AlNF5 ? M1P ADD CIR. DRIVE, C';-WNGE OUT DOOR STAIR. ALLEN. YJELY Za g LNIDR allas#2958 0 ft a oQ m Q M J ? ON 2° C'i J am J 1 I J LOT IIq -OT 121 EXHIBIT B LOT 121E3 I FIR °2' 18000 (M) e =IBEPGLASS FENr-F 4- 4, I5 Q ?D} 10.00' (P) 85 DO (o u ---------------------------- 3xl F Q / -°-' -"-------- I I # SHED I 3 POOL 0 I 18X34.5 ; % -- a s - -, m m I- exSTIKS -- n- - 23m' I L.LQ_ ? iolry'11 oll a / ? I ? I III `?; ry olA^I LOT 86 I i TILE PATIO L .. I I EA5?N6 I. ` ?i ? p95' ?' 1.5 I a ? _ I r"I ? IS.? _ 11? 0 ° 1 I I} ??. 62b6' 16,'1,7 a F 0 0 Y NIDE . 6' WI VINYL SATE Ex15TINFi WALL MAGNOLIA DRIVE (ASPHALT 21.25' BILK TO BALKI (1) SITE PLAN SCALE: I%20'-0' N 7913' i I I LL I lil I` I .. I' j I l4bO' F J a }I QI 3 a } Q m uJ Z QI } Q m In I I? Q ILL Iw LU Iv z 0 Iv Ilz wbD Ij I I 5URVEY TIE 1f5T 25DO FEET OF LOT 82 AND ALL OF LOT 84 AND LOT E6 CQNELTEO MAP OF waBOR OAKS AS RELl127E0 IN PLAT BOOK 3, PA6E 56 OF OE q&IL RECORD5 OF PRELLAS COWY FLORIDA AFI.ELT TO ANY AND ALL EA'@ENT5 OF RECORD. SVD FROPERrY FALLS NTNIN FLOOD 71.4E 7f' AUORDIHS TO FLOOD MAP 30"& 0075 D. OTT OF CLEARKATFR FLORIDA CERYIFIED TO NIELEY K ALLEN LEGEND ? ESftMlif50HY1 Aenv:m smr,Tpes e.AO.b u Q m 0 Y v Q ID N J Q 2 a Q 51TE AREA TABULATION rEA ERR mw. a!? s m EIt IRONG1Ni11mn 3Y Ny N'}1914p016FWM1RIN! 2405 p3 EX Lffi+Fw.1 'be, 11 ROIRFENiY LYD 141CPl,BNY OT 4 no I1?rr seo c+Pa w 2 EA RIt CNX RAp, A1O wlUN415 149 U! Nn Rxl OEU m 3 tt SER ID ! rtRnea loam 447 NOTE: NO PALM5 OR TREES ARE LOCATED IN THE PROP05EO FOOTPRINT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. N 0 9 uj I X ` W Tn T C 0 c? C Q M 03 O 07 00 O O o? 3 a LL z w J J g z W J J 5 N 15T FL SCHEDULE NOTE, SCHEDULE FOR ESTMAfib OILY- CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZES,OENNG IWINtEHEMS ETC. NTH DOOR MANUFACTURER SEE FLOOR FLA151 ELEVATIONS 1 !PR`' DDDRH 910P ORAMN65 FOR ADDITIONAL INORIATIOH SEE SHEET AI FOR HAZARDOUS GLA55 UFO. ALL EJOBtlOR DOORS TO BE IMPACTRATED • TBD - TO BE DETERMINED. vim IEIpR TYPE SHIM MR NOTES 101 W-W W-W OVERHEAD NA OVERHEAD DOOR COP. 107 3.0' FR OUS4N6 LEFT HEATHER SHERD PROVIDE T1?51q.0 RECESS PER MFb. NH O'-0' B'-0' OVERHEAD NA OVERHEAD DOOR WRIP. 104 D'-W 14'-0- OVERHEAD NA. 105 7-0' 6'-W FR OVSKWS LET MEATIER SHIELD ODE TIEESNO..D RECE% FER Hfb. 106 7-0' 6'40 FR CVTSNIB R16HT HEATHER SHERD PROVIDE n Z DRECE55 0 ESHOL Z R W6. PER W6. `6. 101 7-6' 6'-W FR OJE5iN5 RI6M HEATHER SHERD PROVIDE THRESHOLD RECESS PER W6. 106 7'-0' 6'•10' ENTRY 06W HEATHER SHEILD PROVIDE TIRESHOLDRECE`S PER MFG. 109 7'-0' INq INTERIOR SRS LIFT TBD. ILO 5'-0' 6'-O INTEROR D0.. SPINS W. TBD. III 7'-0' 6'-O 6ARA6E TO HOUSE ROOT T.B.D. 10 7-0' 6'-O INTERIOR SHINS LEFT T.BD. IB 7'-0' 6'-0' GARAGE To HOUSE LEFT TBD. IN 7'-0' 61-10' FR .. RI. HEATHERSHEND FFO?IDE 7HRENIOLDREGE55 PER W6. 15T FLOOR KNXW 5p£DU E NOTE, SCHEDULE FOR CSTRV,TIRG PURPOSES ONLY • CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZES, OP61IG 1EGUI El9R5 EC NTH HUIDGH MANUFACTURER. SEE FLOOR RAG 1 ELEVATIO S L NR5 940PDRANNGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFO M&TIO. SEE SHEET AI FOR WKROOS MASS IWO. YROOM 0 ALL EXTERIOR HROOIS TO BE IMPACTRATED • TBD • TO BE DETERMINED. APPROHCHIC06N'L SOB TYPE MPR NOTES NDTX HE6N r00 3'•O' S'-7 00.. NAG HEATHERSHIELO r,W7 31•10' 5'-7 00..HAG HEAVER SHIELD r,003 3410' 2'-0' FINED GLAS5 HEATHER SHIILD Z12 7.7 4--10' OBL MFG HEATHER SHIELD HALL TYPE LEGEND NOTE, HALL TYPE KMBZ'p HOT LISTED NE NOT USED IN PROJECT J• GYPSUM BOARD IEOnH SIDES) 7X4 WOOD STUDS, 016' Of- I- 6YPSM BOARD IBOTH SOESW M WOCD 51105 016' 0L. J' 6YP5UM BOARD 7x6 WOOD STLD5016'OL. R-N BAR 01SLATION Yw" THINS IOVf YRAP FIBER REINFORCED CEMENT SORT J' 6YP51M BOARD 030TH Sol BATT IHEUATION 7x6 MOOD STUO5 016' OL. ?l J' 6YFSUM BOARD IA R.RR1N60 74' OL. 314'RIGID FOAMR-5 FULLY ADHERED TO CMI S REBAR, VERTICAL, IN 3" P51 PUMP MIX FILLED CELL, 5EE PLAN FOR SPACIIii B' CMI J 4' BRICK VENEER MORTARED TO CW, TYP. FLUSH 1WEI D JOINTS 9 REBAR VERTICAL IN 3000 P51 PUMP MIX FILLED CELL.5EE RAN FOR SPACING B' CHU J 4• BRICK VENEER MORTARED TO CM,, TYR 41 FLUSH RBBED JOINTS s REBAQ VERTICAL, IN 3" P5 PUMP MX FILLED CELL, SEE PLAN FOR SPALUG B' CMI 7X4 P.T. FIWING 0 M' OL. fIBER RENFORCFD CEMENT SIDING TYM,WNVI FLARING 0 N' 04. ' RIOD FOANR-5 FULLY ERED TO CM B' CMI 05 REBAR VERTICAL. IN 3000 PS PIMP MX FILLED CELL SEE RAN FOR SPACING B' GMI 7X4 P.T. FURRIN60 74' OC. NOSE HRAP FIBER REPFORCED CEMENT SOIL 47HICK AFF. KILN DRIED P.T. GUARDRAIL DESRSN67 To WITHSTAND 200 LBS, PER S.F. CONERMTED LOAD IN ANY AREA W KILN DRIES P.T. BALLWER550 A 4* SPHERE KAY NOT PASS. BOTTOM RAIL AT 3' AFF. MATCH EXSTMG BALUSTERS N COLL1015 SIZE 4 HEGHT,N F ?7 I L070 HANDRAIL 0.36' ABOVE LEADING E06E OF TREAD P W BALUSTERS SO A4* SPHERE MAY HOT PASS. TYP. PROVIDE T PEEPRECE95 FOR WATIER5EILD DOOR THRESHOLD. WRAP HIDPPSTOP INTO THRESHOLD AN16- VERT.ONJAHBS q? N D• VNYL SELF L ROD CERAMIC TILE SOONER 1 FLOOR © MIRROR O POOL SAFETY LATIN 0 •54' ABOVE FINISH FLOOR TEPPERED'SEMLET 6LA95 HOMER ENCLO FE. IG CURB AT DOOR ?q HNYON BOX ® HVAr PLATFORM 0 &AS BBO W VENTED. TIN) ROOF. STADU56 STETS HOOD AN ELASTLTERIC COAT6G SYSTEM EXTEND 6' VERT' AT HAAS AND MOEt TMW94OLOS 13 6 VINYL SHELVES N? BUILT N LINEN CABINET IS THRCUISH ROOF DRYER VENT 16 %on% FLOOR, I• TO DRAIN 155x5,6/6 ® WORK BERN W UPPERS 14 3'-O RADIJ5 METAL SPIRAL STAIRS OVERALL HEEA1T B, X74314' MF6R TO VERIFY ROOK TO FLOOR IN FIELD. MAX USER HE16W TO BE HO MORE THAN 9 J' TFFAD DEPTH 13' MRL 017 FROM NAAROHEF EDGE TP. ® UNDER STAIR STORADE W N LAYER OF 5/6' TYPE 7C GYP.BD.O CL6. 71 4- 1- THICK MARBLE SELVES © TOP OF WALL 47 AFF © 7x FRAMING W R-II BATT UISLATION 1 U7'0 HVDRAIL 0 ,36' ABOVE IEAOING E06E O TREAD IS' 6YP5M BOARD ON 6.2 FURRN6 ON y' R161D FOAM R-5 UbULATION FULLY ALMERED TO CONC. BLOCK TYPICAL 0 ALL CW CONSTRICTION AT A/C SPACES ® SALT-IN PANTRY ® 42'RN5ED BAR n? LOCATION Of 30'x60' SAME TABLE ® BENCH W BACKREST ® 42* WISH HALL ® N LATER OF 5/6• TYPE *X* GYP. ED . CEILING UNDER SLEFPRG AREA ABOVE IST FLOOR TO 7ND FLOOR OVERALL HEI6M 1510-0 3/4- (17) RISERS 013132- (16) TREADS 0 D' ? 31 HYDRO-STOP COATING SYSTEM EXTEND 6' VERT. AT INALL5 AND DOER THRESHOLDS JOB NkBER 01119 e n DATE 067WO1 DRAM AL5 #V610H DA1F MI 0 0 U y 5 ' m _6p v ? °yme X e S 'm v F ? uanzO°d ?: ?ERhmE'n o M1 LEGEND ® IM5OEY - HALL ® FRAME - BEARING MAIL ® FRAME - PARTITION MALL MASONRY OR FRAME - LOW HALL BEARING POINTS - 0 on 5BE FRANN6 PIAH6 0 FILLED CELL W N N5 REBAR UND. HALL TYPE CALL OUT- DOOR WINDOW KEYED TAB, -SEE TAG - SEE NOTE AHP67TATIOS SEE HALL DOOR MIUOM TYPE LISSEND SCHEDULE SCHEDULE rc 5QUARE FOOTAGE TABULATION EX571N6 RESIDENCE (ANC SPACE - TO REMAIN PROPOSED ADDITION ISL. FLOOR 164 SO. FT. 7m. FLOOR 1,469 50. FT. TOTAL AIL U53 50. Fi. 6ARA6E/ STORAGE 1,437 SO. FT. LANAN 6T1 SO. FT. COVERED B4CCNY 744 511. FT. TOTAL UNDER ROOF 40M SD FT. Z W J ZR AM,QLL a ?gd JZ W J z KEYED NOTES 7 _t__________ __ ------------ 1 --- POOL N BATH i CL6.11 D'-B' O L. TILE 3 48 MTOIIOR,V SHONER i / 0 11 T ® YH F LANAI I Clb.e B'-B' -- ------------ I 3 i TIL B 1 W t I S , T ' 1 ? 7.,J• 7d• 0 ? e 71 N p n 3 4 1 '? R 0 ? 3 a 3 i ,REP,i 72YVY54•A ?- i ACCESS 1• . it u 23 OUTt DOR KrcLHKIV D:' x , _ , D n SOFFIT IF 41 RV STALL REQUIRE FOR MVARG L R - ? B 3 A-II ? 0 I LAR GAR/1( B Si RAGE $ 6 N 73 R? , 0 e ME FT 1 41 z LAR GARAGE . ' • i B CL&.O B -B _ t All 15t. LEVEL PLAN SCALE, 1/4':1'-0' T C 0 Q N N O 0) 00 O O N co m 3 N a II z w J J z w J J 3 IV OORA 20 DOOR SCHEDULE NOTE, YIEASE FOR ESTn ES OILY- CORULTOR TO VERIFY 5135, OP9UG RFOAPFT@R5 ETC, MOTH DOOI NANFACTURR SEE FLOOR PLANS 4 ELEVATIONS 4 MIRS. SWOP DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. SEE SIffT A4 FOR HAZARDOUS 6LASS W'O. ALL EXTERIOR DOORS TO Be IMDALTRATED - TBO - TO BE DETERMINED. WWIN HE16HT TYPE SWHS MR NOTES 101 3--0- T-0' ENTRY LEFT MEATIER SHIELD PROVIDE THRE5HOLD RECEk FOR MF6, 203 Y-0' B'47 PRE4LG-PR NA TBD. XH 7-6' PRE-RIG RIEH TIED. 105 7-W 61M7 BI-FOLD LEFT TED. 106 7.6' 61-0• POCKET RISKY TED. 201 7.6 81-0' PRE-HUNS RJ6HY TBD. X10 4'-0' 8'-0' B-FOLD-iR LEF! TED. X19 1'-D' B'-0' FIFE-TUNS LEFT TBD. 1D 7-b' 8'-0' PRE-NHS RISK TBD. 2V R DOR KNE)OK SC EDU.E INIX14, MOM. SCHEDULE FOR ESTWMTIN6 PURPOSES ONLY -CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SM..OPBWNS RFOAf@ENR ETC. WITH WINDOW MANUFACTURER. SEE FLOOR PLANS a ELEVATIONS a MPRS. SHOP ORAWM65 FOR ADDITICIAI WOWMTRK SM SHEET A4 FOR HAZARDOUS HAYS INTO ALL EXTERIOR WIDOWS TO BE IMPACT RATED/- TOO - TO BE DETERMINED. APPROX. N@ONAL 513 TYPE MR, TOTES WPM HEWHT B 3'-17' 51-1' DBL. RAO WEATHER SHIELD 9 3'-IO' 51-7 DEL HEMS PEATHER SHIELD II 7-7' 4'-MO' DO.* HUNS WEATHER SHIELD Q 3-IO' 5'-1' VOL NMS WEATHER SHIELD B 3'-01 9-1' DEL MWG WEATHER SHIELD H 3'-10' S'-7 DEL NMS WEATHER SHIELD IS 31-1' 4'-6' 013L HUNS WEATHER SHIELD 16 3'-7 4-6' DM%HUNS MEATIER SHIELD I 3'-1' 4.6 DEL.Hlm WEATHER SHIELD G 3'2' 4'1' DEL. HMS WEATHER SHIED X! 7.7 4'-1' DEL. HUNS WEATHER SHIELD X 3'-IO' S'-T OBL. HUNS WEATIHt SHIELD WALL TYPE LEGEND NOTE HALL TYPE NKEERS NOT LISTED ARE NOT USED IN PROLJBrT }' bYP'.UM BOARD IED1N SIDES V-. 1.4 WOOD STUDS 0 VOL. }'FiYPBFHBOARD IBOTH SIDE 1.6 HOOD GTTDS 0 I6' OL. }' CYPSdI BOARD h6 WD00 5TID50 G' OL. R-N Ben WfNLATION Li 1Sr? 1 }'PLYWOOD SHEATHING HOUSE WRAP n FIBER REINFORCED CEMENT SIDNS u }' SYPEM BOARD (BOTH SOES 17 1/ y i 1 R•II BATH IIH0A1KM1 1.6 H000 STUDS 0 16' OL. }' STPSM BOARD 1.1 PRRINS 014'OL. 3H' RIGID FOAM R•5 FOLLY ADHERED TO CM 45 REBAR VERTICAL,, IN 3000 PS PUMP MX FILLED CELL. SEE MAN FOR SPACES GMD }4-BRICK VENEER MORTARED TO 041, TYR }• bYPS1M BOARD 7x4 HX1D SNIDE 0 W'OL. OLROCK OVER 6 MIL. POLY VlW(L VAPOR BARRIER CERAMIC TEE TED. FLUSHAEBED "WTS a5 REBAR VERTICAL, M 3" PSI FU MP MX FILLED CELL. SEE PLAN FOR SPACHNS 1'. (`VV } 4' BRICK VENEER MORTARED TO CHI, TYP, m INE OF LMl M,2, N COVERED BALE 014Y I 4 N'• p 3 KM • ` .w • ON 7• • 4- r- i / O O O 16 I O - a Ew510G PECK TO REMAIN 44' f D O GUEST SUITE L5.0 9'.D• CARPET i I 31 M GAME ROOM . Sn ? LLb.09'-0' CARPET ? VEWY-5a .. _._ __ __---?.------•-__-__ •_- -rT'-" _•--_;.: __ •_ III PB. HALL WAG GIASE W SIRDER TRUSS MELH C0MTFPLiOR 22 Y1•:54- ATTIC D ACCESS AR 13 e _ ? e e ' It 1 ® 1 IO _ n I 5T0RAG e D. ?'. it 7 N,H. 3. . 41* 9 ® L__ , t i --- 15 Yg £ ----- -- e ® 16 4 I e W 'FOR , B D BATH n 6 .09'•?,,,'1 C.RRE W T TAR ON , I CLB.0 '-O' G. TILE 11 4 - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - ° O A' T lnt I ARTSSLRAFES II LI ' GL6.0 9'-0' VINYL/ L.1RE O 34 l 2 ? -- - I A-D I I I I I I I I I I I I -_-_____ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L ------------- FLUSH RIBBED JOINTS S REBAR VERTICAL IN 3000 PSI FLW MIX FILLED LEI. SEE PLAN FOR SPACING, B' CU 1X4 P.T. F11RWN5 014' OL. HOUSE WRAP FIBER REOFORCED CEMENT SANS }' bYPSM BOARD 1.1 RRRN6III 14' OL. 3/4' R1HD FOAM R-5 FULLY ADHERED TO 0-W -8'Gm A5 REBAR VERTICAL N 3000 PSI PUMP MX FILLED CELL. SEE PLAN FOR SPALND r cm 1X4 P.T. FIBRINS 0 N' OL. HOUSE WRAP FIBER REINFORCED CEMENT WIND JOB NMBER OIIM m DATE 061601 a! KEYED N0TE5 DRAWN ALS REVISION DATE N 47 N65L APP. KILN ORIED P.T. WAR(RAIL DE546NED TO MTH 57AND 100 LES. PER SF. CONCENTRATED LOAD IN ART AREA W KILN DRIES P.T. BALUSTERS SO A 4' SPHERE MAY NOT PASS, BOTTOMRAL AT 3- AFF_ MATCH EASTWK BAILSIERS, 4 COLIA9G S3 L HEIGHT. VF O 11/70 HANDRAIL 0 :36' ABOVE LEADN6 EDGE OF TREAD W BALUSTERS 50 A 4.0 SPHERE MAY NOT PAPA TYR PROVIDE 1' OEE R PHEY FOR YEATIERAFJLD POOR THRESHOLD. WRAP MIDRO-STOP INTO T7FYiq,D AND 6' VERT.ON 1AMB5 4? N 17 VINYL SHELF I ROD CBNMIC TILE SHOVER 4 FLOOR a MIRROR . POD. SAFETY LATCH O ?54' ABOVE FINISH FLOOR c H a TEMPERED 5EAMEY' BLASS SHOVER am ENCLOSURE. NO CLFB AT DOOR ` ?4 HIAHSON BOX V `mss ® WAG PLATFORM ? is2.0g II SAS BBD W VENTED. TIM ROOF. ..+m12 STAIN STEEL HOOD AN ELASTODERIL C0ATINS Z¢4 ano SYSTEM EXTEND 6' VERB. AT MALLS Mu •JF ae AND UNDER THRESHOLDS ts 6 VINYL SHELVES M? BUILT IN LINEN C-ABIWT THROWN ROOF DRIER VENT +mi m°sm?°..an ® SLOPING FLOOR 1' TO DRAIN aw.o T5 5.5.5A6 O YORK BENCH W UPPERS 3'-0'1ZAOOIS METAL SPIRAL STARS OVERALL WN5MT 15, i0'-0.3M' WGR TO VERIFY FLOOR TO FLOOR IN FIELD MAX RISER HEIGHT TO BE NO MORE THAN 9 }' TREAD DEPTH 13* MIN. 017 FROM KAWDVER EDGE TYP. ® UNDER STAIR STORAGE W N LAYER OF SM' TYPE 'X' GYP. BD O CLB. 11 4- K THICK MARBLE SELVES TOP OF MALL 47 AFT L FRAINS WR-NTH BATT INSULATION 11/1'0 HANDRAIL 0 .36' ABOVE LEADING EDGE OF TREAD 14 6' SYPSM BOARD ON 1.2 FLRRIN6 ON 3;' RIEID FOAM R-5 INSULATION FULLY ALTERED TO CLTG. BLOCK, TYPICAL 0 ALL CM GCGTRLGTIONI AT AD SPACES NOT USED © 42- RAISED BAN LOCATION OF 30.60' CAME TABLE BENCH W BACKREST ® 41' NISH MALL ® OI LAYER OF 5/6' TYPE 'W GYP. SO. CEILPG UNDER SLEEPING AREA ABOVE IST FLOOR TO XD FLOOR 31 OVERALL HEIGHT ISM I0'-0 314' 01)RISERS 0 13/32* B6) TREADS 0 D' ? XfOROSTOP COATING SYSTEM EXTEND 6' VERT. AT MAILS AND LIVER THRESHOLDS ® OVEMEAD CABINETS ® BAS£ CABINETS LEGEND MASONRY - WAWA ?JJ( L- 3 i FRAME -BLAROG HALL ?` Imo `JE I FRAME - PARTITION WALL W-? LL a t-O MASONRY OR FWV•E - LOH WALL S J ?J BEARING POINTS - 0 0 ® SEE FRAMING BANS J J UXO. F 0 FILLED CELL WN+s F-ATIONE o- 0 ®o -, ° HALL TYPE DOOR WINDOM KEYED CALL OJT - TAb - SEE iAS - SEE NOTE SHEET NUMBER SEE MALL DOOR NWX1H TYPE LEGEND SCHEDULE SCHEDULE 4 O OI 2nd. LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' KEYED NOTES a FIBER REINFORCED CEMENT LAP 50 ' W4* E"'09M (MATCH ENISTN9 TE%IUff 1 E,RO9RF) 0VER HOSE PAW OVER P.T. 2.4 RMNS 014' 0L, VERTICAL 1 FLAT ON GMI FIBER REINFORCED CEMENT LAP SIDINS, W 4' E)"'05 RE MATCH ENISNMS TExNRE 1 EAVELIRF1 OVER MOSS WRAP OVER j' OSB W 2.6 FRAWN60 W OL. W R-R FIBER61A%BATT PFALATIOT ?3 METAL SPIRAL STA115 _HT OVERALL IEI_ 610-0-3/4* MFSR TO VERIFY FLOOR TO FLOOR N FEW 00 MPH RATED SECTIONAL 6ARA&E DOOR MF6R TO APPLY BEAD BOARD AND TRIM AND TO MIBASW FLORIDA PROOIGT APPROVAL N,OBER OR NOA © 47 M91 AFF. KILM DRIED P.T. 6UMDRAIL OE5161ED TO MITN5TAND 100 LBS. PER SF. CO'ENIRATED LOAD N ANY AREA W OLN DRIES P.T. BNES7EA5 SO A 4• SPHERE MAY MOT PA55. BOTTOM RAIL AT 3' AFF- MATCH EH75RN6 BALISTEQ51 COLLM6 51M / HEIER, VIF ?j ,.A' FIBER REINFORCED CEMENT FLANK FREE W. RLVTCH E10 ?6 1.4' FIBER REINFORCED CEMENT FLANK n4 KILN DRIED P.T. CORBEL 4 CROWN MOLOINS, WATCH EASTT46 ® EXtSTINS WISE TO REPWN II 3- CROW! ABOVE DOOR 6' V2 ROM CAPPER 60TEK NOT SHOWN N ELEVATIONS FOR GARITY O DOOR 90WR W NOT / COLD MATER 14 TILE TO BE PICKED BY OP ER / DE96HER ® ELECTRIC STAW:95 VENT WOOD W FIBER REINFORCED LAP SDINS AND 71ZM B 14* BRICK VENEER MORTARED TO CMI, TYP. ? MATCH E%ISTNG 0 ; 4' BRICK VENEER CM 6ALV. FELT BACKED MTL. LATH ON APPROVED HOLrf MRAP ON S' 058 SHEATIRNS ON 2F6 WOOD STUDS 016' OL. W 6ALV. METAL TIES 0 16' OL. VET..4 4- WORK, TYP. MATCH EASTIN6 70' A R WJ(N NORTH ELEVATION 5GALE: 1/4'=1'-0' A- T C O Q O O m co O O N co 6 3 J W X W z w J J 5 z w J J 5 N Ma AW4 00 AHOW a4 M III ABOVE Ca' EAST ELEVATION 5G%E, 114"-1'-0' Y113 NRIBER 01119 g DATE 062001 ? DRAW ALS ? AeT9?T ogre IHON V •?? m3?o o miem OC?M6 Z W Z m j w _LL w ice a t <?g? w rc ET WEER 0 N c? C Q OD 0 co 0 0 N 'T 3 a U) J w x w z w J J 5 z w J J 5 N X15 NRfBER OIIW v DATE 06]0.07 DRAM ALS 1EVMJUI DATE MI 8 A-II 3 12 15 .0 a g il?t V rsst oa ABOA nnorE as `• --------------- -------------- 6 I 6 .. AEa a7 o d?? I...I F D 9o Lj? °' FR m [H E9, 10 EMT 11 ;I EBRE'8 f Q d .e e,?, 4 B ?i Gip __----------------- -------------- _____ _.. ..-..-_.-..-..-..-..-..- . ..-.._.. 'u t --- - - -------------_- -. .. .._..-..-..-..-..-..-. .. _..-.. ApeOaiE as s 1v • F oL?t: to ' -' ?eo.E Vo 1 ? - N I I I III ?' "? ?I a.?,?,.??,. a.:M.'• I _______ _.._..__.-..-..-. 16?W???aq .. 'AGVM SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' I n-n 3 AQ I U B a M'-031 YP .•-••?gEAp AEDaE as iaa,[ o-o• C? I e B d i .. . -..- __________________ T T eernt Z a h- -------------- ---------- ------------ a? t- eaa•?.. ._..- ------------------------------ I ------------------------------ aa AEaaE as a ? ? m W ? J ?aLL W INFAIM B El Mimi mmimml f;YU` W %EET I&'. WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4'=I'-0' 8 0 0 0 '403 1., CITY CW CLEARWATM VARfAIWE TRANSh*tTAL ???_? t?waur m: `' =OOAWO aattdartk at„ amt ro.igi.en WOO t r Ow Asst. My Room" aw" ftmff- Do. Worm Z-1. P... SAVE OWbv 26. 1995 V!6 27 0 VR#96-27 Donald A- Maariana Tni1Ti : = Tom Mom. &MMON lead P%MW • ATNE: GarY and Mary Dworkin 41 Oaks, Lots 70 and 00 21>' aR-F d art t/a.ian Avarv 0:42 ears a Ma um Datrdrad S rqb Fsnti? Dw eaq MAN DENGMTNW AS 4199 ala Filthy Rasidawaai 61 G. . RUN isMO.ONOW3 4.04 11AR a 1oc 46 10 prowrt S Alk ?? Ot wial ' fet d It) 3 R tr pstwtR a skrttcttar) srtbsck s122 R 6l SOON ' ?'••sY 25 R is mq*sd: (a 11 R to 5 at s sbuckm 4 pw•b itrs naltats l s R s train t31 s par c to prtmit 400 c d rpsrt rpme ter ' lriet'ilrsir 4D 1+A+a+t s +rgtak 9 at arbor t1.b. Orts or loft ?a and 00. irmw _ a3 i ?r/e l4nwi? Naaidarwiai e). Y?2 s1AN101tMOw+p tllla u060 Aasaa aaM b.Mddud u.rP I?r M.,rtaia0 a?iwr diwiebk Ilrt& Saab Fswip flesid.tyd IFeft Mrys Fasii)tr Res" tiat sr.t1? Sutab Fm* Residential chest 5:,ale Ftsnitr gssidrrrual My to"MMAS tRIW"Ma TO comma T say too $O M lW =WAm pRDvW W vmOE =mums *HMO W IETt man To ZORwts AT LsaST MMMtMM Maw! TO T1E SCHEDULMD PIANAC T11AISMTT® DY: Donald Melons DATE AWa 20. 1Ot R M KM JC HEANNO NY T?E DEViLOMIMT CODE AWMTMBff WAND VR9527.DOM #Mimi ,r C4 tilMar A. for the following variances: 11) a setback variance of 7.0 ft . to allow replacement of an existing screened pod enclosure 18.0 h from the fNagnotte Drive ttght-of-way where s minimum setback of 25 It is required; and (2) a setback vorlance of 7.1 ft to allow replacement of an existing screened. pool enclosure 17.9 ft from the Bay Avenue right-of-way where a minimurn setback of 25 ft Is required at 322 MMagrwlle Dr. Harbor Oaks Sub, Lou 87 9 89 toned RS 6 (Single Family Residential). V11196.47 Mr. Richter presented background Information and written staff recommendations. He stated the applicant wishes to replete a storm-damaged screen pool enclosure to the east of their single family home. The applicants indicate the pool and enclosure have existed since 1954 and are well mooned from view by landscaping. Staff felt conditions support the request and recommended approval with two standard conditions. Janet MacNutt. the owner/applicant, responded to questions. stating a pump and fiber enclosure will remain as It exists and is not part of the application. She said a recent diving board. enclosure as it storm ble tahe storm, 'wbh through th peaked•oorf and raisedhar s' ova to was before One kmer from a nearby property owner was submitted in support of the application. No one was present to speak In support or opposition to the request. Member Jonnatti moved to grant the variances as requested in Item C4 because the applicant has substantially met all of the standards for approval as listed in Section 45.24 of the Land Development Code, subject to the following conditions: 1) These variances are based on the variance application and documents submitted by the applicant, including maps. plans. surveys, and other documents submitted in support of the applicant's variance request. Deviation from any of the above documents submitted in support of the variance request regarding the work to be done with regard to the site or any physical structure located on the site, will result in thess variances being null and of no effect; and 2) The requisite building permitts) shall be obtained within one year from the date of this public hearing. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. NlMutes Approval -- June 13, 19913 Member Johnson moved to approve the minutes as submitted in writing to each member by the Board Reporter. The motion was duly seconded and carried unanimously. Board and Staff Comments Member Johnson expressed concern with recent Commission discussion relating to changing the qualifications required of advisory board members. Members agreed development industry experience is a valuable asset to the boards, but not to the exclusion of other characteristics that provide balance and diversity. Discussion ensued regarding DCAB's approach to making decisions based on Code requirements. standards for approval. personal observation, and practical experience in the community. It was felt the main qualifications should be for people interested In the local community who are wilting to spend time learning about the land Development Code. 06/27196 322 M"GiX or 960706 dbltow '°wl .AL-02-ft e3t4e M4 Lft" A MACMM •lf 443 ISTS P*61 04 tio.a 0 . r .? t ' tl O• ;? yam: A survey of Lots 67 1c 09 Harbor Oaks as recorded in Plat Book 3' Page 65 of the Public Recorde of Pinellas County, I htrsby tertif 'that'this is a correct repreeentation of* the above delaribed property, that the building lies as shorn and that there are no encroachments. VAY AS 1959 Reg. Surveyor No. 78 ? Ode 4 VA /? LOOZ/ I Z/S u4q-aurejAdtWjSioloouuoaa/a1isgann/t.uoo*jalunutaio,?uz-si!?oijgnd//:"q - ® 1 - 23 ®l__l ®Calendar - MiQOSOft ... Tidemark Advantage .,. .fin _ Q ° o 0 Pj 11:21 AM Google Maps - Microsoft Internet Explorer File Edit Vie.a Favorites Tools Help IJrd x Address ? httP:ffmaPs•9oo9le.com/maPs?tab=v:,l 0 Links ED Miscellaneous Neoas ED Planning Iy'dveather 4M City Phone Listing C GIS C The Knot Web Images Video Nevis Maps Gmail more - Saved Locations Sign in Help e.g.,'10 market st, san Francisco' or -hotels near lax' Search Maps G0081C.- Maps search the map Find businesses Get directions - Search Results My Maps Print ® Email ee Link to this cage Done Internet n x ? k r Y . ? imp .. i d r ? I it .v s sy } 3.1 1 ? I Ki ?„ ? list- is lit m f"r 1 a 'ice . T' t k A.L ??a ? ? ?"„? ? sat"? ? §.? r . ;i?a-.,.? .. .. t,z ?fie ? u.„ t? m r r? ra ,_.??, ?.. ??. ?N// •"aa. u,. A ,... :?. ?_ ..u Vii' b'LONORETE UIRB BA515 1460' 1Fat ---------- *t* ------- I 4'x4' °00'00"E (M) • b5.007F17 .3. N i --------- ------- p 1 I EX. BRIGK DRIVE I I i I TOREMAIN bVa" LOT 54 1 a l I I O I ? O ? `I I 1 .57.20' J ) 1 1 14.0' I I tr I I N 1 29A2' Ib:O ? I I ? i N EX. 2 STORY FRAME i 1 v I 1 rn HOUSE #405 1 I 29.13' I I Irz?_? I I 71:45' NEW BREEZE WAY I I I I I j LOT 86 ill N W ' S 1 TE PLAN O w to I 56ALE: 1'=20'-0" - ?? 2b0 m I 0 20' ao' eo' Is I p I Q 5HED a Z SCALE: I" = 20'-0" I 11 MAGNOLIA TREE, TOREMAM ---?0 NZ7 5'5/W 80.00' (M) _ L m ?YS ? g'-O• lo'-O' Q 72.0•/ TO EX PATIO 66bb' TILE PATIO FA5TIN6 POOL 18X34.5 EXI5nxG I . 9O 1 L ---------------------------------------------------rv------- ---------- - 1 I 1 10.00' ---- ---- (P) --- ---- --- .14b0' 55G0°00'00"W (M) &' FIBS OLA55 FENGE 180.00' (M) OM 20' SITE TRIANGLE (TYPIGAIJ ,- NEW BRIGK DRIVEWAY TO --//7MATOH EXISTIN6? 1v? ! FIR 2! In• i I ?I I I 5#' 3' WIDE x 6' HIGH y VINYL 6ATE ppp?-I d ?3 I O I O I m ! O I raN H?AC I I PAD ?1 o I I i 3 - I N 0 I Q O 3 v L0- j m I I ? 25.0'(0) 1 0 FIR V2• i - ----------- --- ------------- - ---- Q ? . 900E BATH w I - cL6. B'-a' a I ¦ c. TILE 3 _ WDOOR I _ 3 21 , - ® W1 I LANAI cL6. a H'-a• -- -------- IO 3 ? I IH Ib , ? b y 106 22 23 S a ? 113 a _______ , ? 9 it . 24 ` l _ 22J5 • ATTIC ``__7 fi ? VIII 23 OUT , OOR KITGH N i ' i n 01 I'. F ® L--- j 41 SOFFIT IF ' REOUIFE® FOR RV STALL WAL 31 08 µ zd 1 e , ? ICAR GARAGE I O ST RAC E O I IIO I ? ' 30 f 23 I 23 h 13 , e ? e 102 o A 0). O 103 I 2 CAR GARAGE F • iG - -- O I us. a e'-e• I I i J P-111 1 1 1 q-1, Ist. LEVEL PLAN SCALE: KT.5. r--170777107- I I I I I I 1 I I I i 1 I III -L ------------ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I i I I I I I L------------- • I 1s 2 W atf ??C1u, nJ ?a 3 (?1u?t CJ W O ) 00 zo aV 14 ? - --------- ------------------------- --------- ------------- - 1 I 6 - 1 q• LOVERED BALLONY I D, 4 Iv' 1 B ev . N { {'- 7 w 201 13 14 15 I6 1 : I 1 IT - EXI6". DECK TO REMAIN a i 16 G,UESY SUIYE I Y CLO. 0 4'-0' CARPET Y I 32 " LAME R00M i 51M Gb. 0 9'-0' CARPET PE. WALL WAG CHASE W/ 61RDER TRU55 j MECH. 1 1 22 Y",64. ATTIC e 2 13 D _-- D p j o211 _ ® i 210 I STDRAG e ,- pq. it ? n.{ ?. { 1) 1 e 4 L p I N IS 6 } -- J 26 4 D ©g I i D 20 OU ll?' FOR e 6 \ te 1 ? ' LM% f: T.? LJ ' e 1 6ATN ' ' ? I WET6AR 6 • .04 0 G. TILE - e . - D 1 . 0 4'-0' G. TILE 3 4--11 D D 1 4 Q 03 - - 1 1 O I 1 n' r I 1 ? I J I i 21 II 1 I I - I I I ARTS ft GRAFTS O W". 0 41-0' VINYL/ G. TILE I 1 I ? I I I ? 2nd. LEVEL PLAN 5GALE: KT5. 5 ABOVE 0'-0' ABOVE O'-0' A F NISH RLb2 MATE ABOVE O'-0' 5 s I i I NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/5'4-0" a A FINISH FIDOR '21 J O3 UT ABOVE O-0' la a i7 -- --- -- ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITto p CLEARWATER gB?EqA??µµ55???? ABOVE O'-0' ts'0 ABOVE O'-0' IpLJII j 1 4 I 1 ABOVE O`-0* a 1 I , 1 , 1 , I pIryl5H Rpm J? I? 1 EAST ELEVATION 5GALE: 1/8"=1'-0" ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER O'-0' O'-0' • 19'4 3/4- ABOVE O'-0" M H FLOOR. %i EXIST. A ABOVE VIF VE O'-0' MOW SOUTH ELEVATION ORIGINAL RECEIVED AUG 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ABOVE o'-0• --- w ra. s?aviras oELx s wnu ABV ABOVE O'-0' AUG 13 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Am-' WEST ELEVATION ORIGINAL 56ALE: 1/8^=P-O" RECEIVER la w Abw- Sri: .. f,>r. r. f r r f # l.:f N f rv. : ?? ?z? + s ® ® , ®IrthOX - Ir7.R0=0, iTidemark Advantage [Robert Tefft - R_T] ---._ APP20D7-031300.. ®? MaL ! a 403 .. ? i ? ? ] Pirict(a-, Count. 4:34PM File Edit Options 1ndota Help ... --- - E.it New Open 7 k L,et RBE 'Case Browse Quer}.? Select GIS [ (dumber Fraction: Prefa' CB - --- 63 F - I,t ?NCLI- Code Inspector Name IN, e: Suffk: Bldg: Unit: i Parcel Parcelt_a=_ea i i ? Case No Address APP2007.00003 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP1998-010769 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP1998.080147 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP1998-080245 403 MAGNOLIA DR B CP1 999-06175 403 MAGNOLIA DR t' BCP1999-07128 403 MAGNOLIA DR j BCP1999-07134 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP1999-07241 403 MAGNOLIA DR ( BCP1999-07274 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP1999-09089 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP2001-06305 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP2002-02573 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP2002-02573A 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP2003-07575 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP2005-01424 403 MAGNOLIA DR i BCP2005-01427 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP2005-01429 403 MAGNOLIA DR I`I 8CP2005-05048 403 MAGNOLIA DR 18CP2005-06329 403 MAGNOLIA DR 6CP2005-07861 403 MAGNOLIA DR € CDC2002.00678 403 MAGNOLIA DR CDC2006-00726 403 MAGNOLIA DR COD1999-02999 403 MAGNOLIA DR j COD2001-01572 403 MAGNOLIA DR COD2001-03691 403 MAGNOLIA DR {II COD2002-01330 403 MAGNOLIA DR i FLS2007-08041 403 MAGNOLIA DR MIS2001-00023 403 MAGNOLIA DR 0CL-0001983 403 MAGNOLIA DR G+ 1 Help Cancel St atua D eacnption Project REC r appeal from a La, el One r, ax,bk standard d_._ ..p3 nt) appre.aldecision pursuant to Cum ,u^r , D,,.efc p.ALLEN RESIDENCE CMP INSTALL I.EryER,_ .', SERV FEEDER BATSTONE,SARAH CMP CONNECT NA.TUR>L GAS RANGE ALLEN, STEVE RET CC114STRUCTIOIIOf UTILITYSHED -10X12 ALLEN,STEVE RET r-rccf 18sks mod 43s a gal aurric KIELY,ALLEN RET CE:{OLr ION OF INTERIOR art-:LLB NON STRUCTURAL- 6LD PERMIT ;S__6rpt SR-0712? KIELEY EXP INTERIOR REMODEL - scase notes KIELEY RET Upgrade service to twin 200 amp panels. ALLEN, STEVE & KYLIE REC INSTALL (2)SPLsSYSTE1,1 SOrd2NDFL00RAll Dr1jSP0SYSTEIAON3RDFLOOR-ALLA.RE TONSY'S TEKIELEY CMP pipe and connect natural gas fireplace BELLEAIR HOMES Vol IN eALLb° OODEN FENCE 6FT X 177FTAS PER DQr hINCS. ALLEN, KIELY EXP ADDING -T,70 STORY GARAGE WMTH DRIVEtt YS' LIVINCf FAMILY AREA UPSTAIRS ALLEN, KIELY EXP ADDED CIRCULAR DRIVE. CHANDGED OUTDOOR STAIR. CHANGED G.'-.R-'..GE DOORS 9.. DOORS INTO G; .RA.GEALLEN, KIELY EXP NEVI FENCE PVC VINYLB'X 143` ALLEN, KIELY CMP CONCRETE POOL & SP: -,Vrs'H PAVER DECKR.ND CONCRETE 'A;ALL -1&" X 100' ALLAN, STEVEN """` Vol CONCRETE SPA?iATH PAVER DECK ALLAN, STEVEN Vol INSTALL I C O N CRETE 6 LO C K WALL ALLAN, STEVEN CMP INSTA.LLVINYL FENCE 4"x24. KIELEY,ALLEN CMP RELOC:,T10N OF EXISTING FENCE FVCi ALLEN, KIELY CMP eG' OF 1 1GAS PIPING DISCONNECT PIPING AT HCUSE AND PRESSURE CHECKTHEN RECONNECT MARTIN, KIELY NVO Large boat parked in frontward CMP Trailer in between structure and right of way. vehicle parked in grass CMP Debrts stacked on sidewalk for o,.er 2 week's NVO Ovcrgrown CLS r riv irat c grass. no garage CMP Peat parked on la - n DEN Flexit;1 Standard Development apprc:°al for an addition to an existing single-family detached duetting with a r ed ALLEN RESIDENCE COM 1 TREE FRCf4T AND 1 TREE SIDE ALLEN OB COMIPUTER CONSULTING: O'ieNER PHONE 44:7-1171; BUS PHONE °.-'1-6224: LLP TITAN DATA SYSTEMS, LLP _.. r - Nam J W SMITH DESIGN GROL • 1 SARAH BATSTONE STEVE ALLEN STEVE ALLEN J .000020246 .RB0054451 j .RB0054451 1 .ER0013997 .CAC027356 i .C-6237 3 .OWNER .OWNER j KIELY M ALLEN KIELY M ALLEN PATRICKJ O'CONNELL i PATRICKJ O'CONNELL ! PATRICKJ O'CONNELL I JAMES M SOMMERS OWNER MICHAEL DEEGAN KIELY ALLEN KIELY M ALLEN SARAH PBATSTONE KIE LY ALLE N KIE LY ALLE N KIELY ALLEN J.W. SMITH DESIGN GROI i OCL9700900 STEVEN S ALLEN Close current window I® Ti&niar k Advantage [Robert Tefft R_T] ® Calendar - f licro .oft ... magnolia r 3 -staff - -- - Count}' Prope.., v ??: L ia: io 4t•1 Pile cc=i u?5:?ns VAndow Help ...... ._ ............ ..... ,........ J t Lit ri- Op- Ta,k lia QBE CIS Case Browse E Query• Select GIS Help Cancel ' i radar `_ .._... ^ ,2 7F ` _ Parcel« tE:-7:?-1E',27G-GG0-C=2G I i Case# Code -Inspector ={ 1 flame Farces- ? i Parcel Case It Address .. I Parcel q Status Desch" 1 ption BCP1998-010769 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000.0820 CMP INSTALL M,E ER CAN & SERB. FEEDER BCP1998-080147 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000.0820 CMP CONNECT N_-Ur .L, C S RrJIGE BCP1998-080245 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0820 RET CONSTRUCTION OF UTILFTYSHED-10X12 BCP1999-06175 403 MAGNOLIA DR 1 6-29-1 5-362 70-000-0820 RET reroo; 1Sses mod 2sG= gatvaumo 0CP1999-07128 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15.36270-000-0820 RET 1s-=ECo1 ?Et.?OLI ION OF INTERIOR ',V LLS-NON STRU;eURAL - BLD ER1.17 BCP1999 07134 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-28-15-36270-000-0820 EXP INTERIOR REMODEL -- see case not€s 7119,S9 j BCP1999-07241 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29.15-36270-000.0820 RET Upgrade .:mice io twin 200 amp panel=. BCP1999.07274 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29.15-36270-000-0820 REC INSTALL (21 SPLl SYSTEMS ON 2WD FLOOR AND El) SPLri SYS-EI l ON 3RD FLOOR - ALL ARE TON SYSTEMS - FW,'t EACH - NO ELECTRIC j BCP1399-09089 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0820 CMP pipe and connec4 natural gas fireplace COD1999-02999 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0820 CMP Detri_ stac}:ed on srdeiual. fo• eve- 2 . eek_ OCL-0061903 4031,4AGNOLIADR 16-29.15.362700000820 OB COafPUTERCOiSULTIUC:C, ;ERPH.1.-?7-1171. BUS PHONE--1-a-:LLP • Close current window _ M _f der • 1 ifcrQ rft . - i1o nolia 903 SEoff . Nmell? ?? J_ s X ®L^ bet J ,! ?l _) J . `_J ®© ® Cal, g untt ProPe Q 13 AM lie TIdLitiaikAdvantage[Robert Tef#t-R_T] - JL di ' Ffile Edit Options 'Window Help - - -- - - - -------- - - -------- - ---- --------- I ?l? L? ? LfJ f? Cf ( Uit New op- Ta,k List QBE GIs Case Browse Query Select GIS Help Cancsl Address Parcels tv-2G-1E-_'Z70-OOC-GEcO Case t - . Cod- Inspector _ j Name: i I pare; i t ' I 1 Pa cel Cases Case i Addiess Parcel d Status Description A.PP2007-00003 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16,29-15-36270-000-0840 REC sr appeal °rcn, a Leval Cn_ i,tf.ri w star-,arc dE ee opm-nt, apprc: al d _c,a p ?uartte Ccr ur ;; Cc, cpmznt c^e tCDC) ?_cticn _C1 A that a req j BCP2001-06305 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000.0840 Vol INS7 LL 0ODEN FENCE EFT X 177FT AS PER D i,GS. BCP2002-02573 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0840 EXP A.DDI " 0 STORY GARAGE VvMH CRP E1,vAYS1 LPANG,' Fr! ILA` AREA fPS yr.IRs BCP2002-02573A 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16.29.15-36270-000-0840 EXP ADDED CIRCULAR DPWE, CHAHDGED OUTDOOR S7 AIR. CHANGED GARAGE DOORS ? DOORS INTO GARAGE: CN HGED E S t FACING t lNDO'-A S. CHANT BCP2003.07575 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0840 EXP NE AI F ENCE P'dC VhlYL E- X 14 ° BCP2005-01424 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0840 CMP CONCRETE POOL 9. SPA, Yi5H PAVER DECK AND CONCRETE Y1'-':LL -12° X 100' BCP2005.01427 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000.0840 Vol CONCRETE SPA V €H PAVER DECK `:. BCP2005-01429 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0840 Vol INSTALL 1 CONCRETE BLOCK FALL BCP2005-05048 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29.15-36270-000-0840 CMP INSTALL VINYL FENCE -' z 2-1. ( BCP2005.06329 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0840 CMP RELOCATION OF EXISTING FENCE {PVC; j 8CP2005.07861 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15.36270-000-0840 CMP -40 OF 1 14" GAS PIPINIG DISCONNECT PIPING AT HOUSE AND PRESSURE 1-HECKTHEN RECONNECT [ CDC2002-00678 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000.0840 NVO Large boat parked in front and CDC2006-00726 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0840 CMP Trailer in belwe en structure and right of way. vehicic parked in gra__ COD2001-01572 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29.15-36270-000-0840 NVO Overgrown f ! COD2001-03691 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000-0840 CLS no driveway, c grass. nc garage COD2002-01330 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15.36270-000-0840 CMP Boat parked on la::n FLS2007-08041 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000.0840 DEN FlExfbdc Standard Development approval for an addition to an existing single-family detached welling with a reduction to the front fncrth s setback from 229 fee j MIS2001-00023 403 MAGNOLIA DR 16-29-15-36270-000.0840 COM 1 TREE FROHT AND TREE SIDE • • -.. . _- _.__._....._. _.._...__ __- _.._e... ... _--?..._._....,-._. .... __.._?_-__.__ _.. _. _.m.- .. _.. ...._ - _...... __...- ___?_. .. ...._.?. _. _ -_ .. _....____....-..__?___ - __ [Ready QUef1,'.-- ?EIECt-_ _. GIS t I .-.ddf.?.?? ^3 Number: Fraction: .Prefix: Stree.1ta«e- Ca e Code inspector -'; 1 1 hikGtl0tt?. Name type: Suffix Bldg: Unit i Parcels F- ParcelCases _ !r !?? _? 1 lis3SAM Case No Address "Status Description Project' _ COD2001.06140 415 MAGNOLIA DR CLS :art; being done with, out permits. DWROKIN COD2001-06289 1554 MAGNOLIA DR CLS -BV- vhte Ford van JON HINDS COD2001-06350 1562 MAGNOLIA DR CMP A.BV--x=, engine missing ELINOR LOWE COD2001-06372 1554 MAGNOLIA DR CMP ABA, - blue Datsun JON HINDS COD2001-06454 910 E MAGNOLIA DR CMP ABA?-Fora JUSTIN WILLIAMS COD2001-06455 912 MAGNOLIA DR CLS =-BUJ-Che y JASON TILLEY COD2001-06456 912 MAGNOLIA DR CMP Debris. JASON TILLEY COD2001-06689 1413 MAGNOLIA DR CMP Large truct:_ (commercial; and running roofing business out of house JOHN AUGUSTO COD2002-00026 315 MAGNOLIA DR CLS improper tree pruning.ttopping QUAILYNN MC DANIEL i COD2002-00169 2020 MAGNOLIA DR CLS tree removal wk permit? RANDALL SMITH COD2002-01223 1592 MAGNOLIA DR CMP no OCL-d=_L•,rls MILDRED J NASTA TR I COD2002-01330 403 MAGNOLIA DR CMP Boat parked on lawn KIELYALLEN FLD2005-07074 600 MAGNOLIA DR VST 1) Flexible Development request to perm'i't a I is d Use c offices (= 2EG squat feet" and nine attach d •e?in. MAGNOLIA PK OFFICE & TOWNHOMES SCOTT LINCOLN FLD2005-11111 600 MAGNOLIA DR WIT rlexdbl - Development approval to permit a mix d u - r2'7 attached da., lna units and',22 square fee t of office LITTLE BIG MARKET HOUSH GHOVAEE FLD2005-11111 507 MAGNOLIA AVE WIT Flexible. Development approval to permit a mud use- r27 attached d aelfing and and .,22c square fee t of office LITTLE BIG MARKET HOUSH GHOVAEE i FLD2007-06023 607 MAGNOLIA DR REC Flexible Development application to revise a master site plan p,, ioush.? approved bythe. City Commiss ion :n 199iMORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ROBERT PERGOLIZZI, FLS 00-02-12 320 MAGNOLIA DR APR Flexibe Standard development approval to reduce: the required rear setbackto five feet where ten feet is the r FRITZ, ROBERT ROBERT FRITZ FLS O1-06-45 2000 MAGNOLIA DR APR lexible Development approval to reduce the r quired front i west) setback from 25 feet to seven feEt, as part o LIROT LUKE LIROT FLS 02-05-37 208 MAGNOLIA DR Vol Flexible Standard Development approv al to increase the. length of a permitted dock from - fat !5G percent of ttWALTER, CHARLES DOCK PERMIT C-4192 FLS2006-08053 428 MAGNOLIA DR WIT FI x.hl=. Sta lard Development apprcval for an addtion to an existing single family home - -cvi 44 edium Den MAGNOLIA PROJECT EARL HENRY FL52007.08041 4U3 MAGNOLIA DR DEN rwxi':le Ctanaard Development apprcval for an a„d#?ar, to an ?x t ng single-famrty d?tach_d d„e!I'ng w h e tea ALLEN RESIDENCE J.W. SMITH DESIGN G;. HOU1999-00289 1550 MAGNOLIA DR CLS C.H.U.D. insoecticn. HOU2003-00034 809 MAGNOLIA DR B CMP Mold and mild=_-v. DAVID D HUTCHESON HOU2004-00109 1214 MAGNOLIA DR CMP CIIHS Rehab RL-1 Es, CLARA F BATTY MIS2000-00431 410 MAGNOLIA DR COM =rcc removal DYAS, MARY MARY DYAS MIS2001-00023 403 MAGNOLIA DR COM 1 TREE FR0ll7.-IID 1 TREE SIDE ALLEN OCL9700900 MIS2001-00044 1950 MAGNOLIA DR COM REMOVAL OF 2 TREES Its REAR OF Y.-RD FOR 1-.DDn0rl OF IlE-,V INGRCUND POOL ONDREJCAK, DON CPC057073 MIS2001-00129 1963 MAGNOLIA DR COM Remove one holey tree. WALCZAK, GERARD GERARD WALCZAK MIS2001 00245 304 MAGNOLIA DR COM REMOVE a iC TREES l OAK", WEST SIDE OUTSIDE FEIICE ST JOHN. DR B.H.TREE SERVICE MIS2001-00248 304 MAGNOLIA DR Vol ROBERT MAYER MIS2001-00297 1407 E MAGNOLIA DR REC iC- rER IMPACT FEE FOR IRRIGA 1011 METER I.lSs AILt.,',IOH SWEENY, RICHARD RICHARD SWEENY MIS2001-00543 1860 MAGNOLIA DR REC 2 FREES 117ES-SIDE OF HOUSE BLASKO MAX BLASKO I i MIS2001-00565 2000 MAGNOLIA DR REC Removal of 1 Declining tree From Next to the Gri.'e:ia,r afterfhe fact. 6_e BCP2001-0E,01? LUKE LIROT STEPHEN BREWER L/ MIS2001-00800 1870 MAGNOLIA DR COM Removal of 1 Daad 7r-e 'remthe Front of the Lot NINAWATKINS NINA WATKINS MIS2002-00289 429 MAGNOLIA DR COM rt :a atelt •c palm trees. MC QUIGG, MICHAEL MICHAEL MC QUIGG Heip Cancel • • rHe [cz uUre rnrnp ---..- .... .......... ................. ..... 1 L rte- IJ ?4 c-f- Exit N-, Op- T,A list QBE GIs Cdse Browse S U R V E Y SECTION +4 RANGE +5 TOWWW THE WEST 25.00 FEET OF LOT 82 AND ALL OF LOT 84 AND LOT 86, CORRECTED MAP OF HARBOR OAKS. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK J. PAGE 56 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. SAID PROPERTY FALLS WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "X" ACCORDING TO FLOOD MAP 3125096 0015 D, CITY OF CLEARWATER. FLORIDA. CERTIFIED TO: KIELEY M. ALLEN. THIS SURVEY WAS DONE WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE SEARCH. THIS SURVEY IS NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED.DATED AND EMBOSSED WITH SEAL. THE SURVEY DEPICTED HERE IS NOT COVERED BY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE. C MAGNOLIA OR/VE L. (ASPHALT 21.25- BACK TO BACK) BEARING BASIS I IF f ' IY' U :w N q w r,I3 QT4 iVA D' 14.8 X7 " Q ti O h 2a.o2' U 2D. f 3' W h n 0 2 r2.oo• 'i~ M dS.OD'(P) b h Lor da h 4 ?b N B5.00'CP? SDO'00'00 "W LOT tape 180.00' M 4.3' 0 0 c 70.00' (P) a I m LOT B4 I \. CIS ?? o I I 0 .;SD 68.65' ? ?, 0 J 6tl.66' 1 I J? j ?h .? 9R/CK %A 3(y W MAaNOLU1OR AdasOMB ALLEN, KEtY 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP2002-02573 BOUNDARY SURVEY TW.. SURVEY BEARINGS (r WOW) ARE USM (IN RECOM PLAT Job No. 97-5ft -Date: 41++10 Drawn By: SCOle' LEGEND (Ian) hic" o ((t: CAILIJIATFD O GII !ET fldl mm M/.YI /3? • i' iWgD IIIOM mm D um 9LI Op11C1ETE • ICY'mmo cowose YONacm a/IM MWI-OF-WAY • /IN ra M pipe cow-mm WAN WWAM sraAr a'ws"m Firi=°°e R cm c0cmm aoom a BTU= W. ssu W& & Dmoila J °i 0 s - m q I 7 ih. 0 h 70.00' (P) 25.0 FE GE 180.0 lb- (M) LOT 72pA LOT 71T? C---_? 1 FEB 2 7 2002 DEVELUFtR" D E SU 2/05/02 `' GORtd KILLION t:47 VA:?lttn MOO NORTH CLr1MAfi?, i'.VbOf. 34756 (ia:; 443-706; I NCO7 TM SUM- AS ItLIM -se r AtOA?Ot. A4IIWST Iw: ?.A:?, ,=If O/MR+x 1 -a OF TK P-1004 t[L?IOII 472-W/ narm STPAPU. BY: F. aim STAR rROimWAL An aHlrne IY.. 31-a, • ME lWr Z'h M[[r Cr WAWA ANO AS LO p? p? r0. CCRREC! p A1AP d' IGRIn R[CCRpEp Ry P{Ar r 4 E PAC[ Se C M[ PueLrc R[coROJ 1AT cOU WWI FILV SUBVECr TO AIIr AND ALL CASEMSMS a, RlCORO. SAIo PROPERri' MALL! NYMIN 0 A. ACCORpMT r0 /LOCO A'4P JErsOW DOER a Clrr OM C,WA q OyMOA, CERTIFWO ro: !AA' A 1 [rRoApturm. P.^ COUwpNwEALIN LANO,?Mt INJIMANC[ COArWWr• In[Liy Ar. AL[iM. ' INIS sURY[r WAs Oomr *VMOur +EI! [ ,iNMr, OM A NrLC S[MCM . rMs sURYJr M Nor w%LID uHLEss J/CNMOA}id AND EAfOOSSEO w/TN sm. 1"r SURr[r' M'PICr[o N[R[ IS Nbr COLTR[O Or PROfESSEoNAL 1 MO/LArr INSURANCE ' 3 Or 8 A. I I N 114 i ? /r I ? ?? MINIM f i BONING APPROVED Bui?IfcM UM ?! "---- -'---'; 1 I j CITY OFCLEARWATER gp s?--_ PtANNIN EPARTMENT REAR - DA -BY ' -CkE1d RBI 41kvx I ? , ' 11 4*w crv W 11rr RAIAv \ f . ICa lr ATI we", EM1M . I 0'! 1''°' ik? L - / ? ? N,? r^tr! 9'qe j Ia?1 _ _ - N 9o?Cb-Cb? All. E IL {--GrsrIWA- S.s W" &^vA Wuc-? \ ^xAC G ?R?f? ary Rt6M5 Iii/ rl?V?l? !?I\h ?j - - - \.K111Nu ?GLIt? --- ?V ? I I 1 ?a 1 y 1* i I i t i I I 0 j,III '? I Nor, T44 I 1 d. DEAS?3-19-01 i QLL IroVa0JEh6Nrs rp bE ENSTr1LLfA ull7}IIN tNf (&4r- Ot-- WAY 6114 SrMAAALWS ? SP6GIG Ith1?0A1S. SEA ?L-Dd fPruL't" uE3 a2Y. aa+ 012003 DtYEIVl?i ¦I fEAYICfE tnr n/r.LEApp R?tt 403 MAGNOLIA DR BCP2002-02573A ADD CIR. DRIVE. CNU1rrE OUTDOOR STAIR, ALLEN. KIELr [anMa LMDR mth" A - sal a MAL 94/C D1(YND • 0 kuro agmc w wrc N 1 ? l EI FA M E7 NEW El U r--ELEVATION SCAB V4'-I'-0' I 1 11>9NaNfi 0044 oovw hm, Far Rl (1) VI as wso F0. ?i tqwv H?ks aJ Rs• f? 'IKU?i ?L{'oa '{?{eegt+a? FFM ' k yi--- - b flwJft cW AW KaA01• W,%W W M 1r bw.,yPi4.r- ?_ 1 - 10 -4w rarer W. L- r?e . W _- QQ QQ E I a? MULIPW ' GG ?Y w +u?r i s 3 a 13OUNDARY SURVEY. • WEST 40. FEET • OF LOT . '1 Os. & ' EASY ;3Q. FEET OF • LOT.'. ofQ7,. HARBOR DAKS,, - SECTION. I Be, TOWNSHIP.- 29• SOUTHp; RANGE I S. EAST CITY OR CLEARWATERo PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. j z w FcM • Q u.o'?s•4' rcM r O M ET'A ?.• ?? ?_? n r Z PMNapt PP. 0 ri M , p 60. 0c; wnaz - - - - ?:t - =- V? --? ? o.?• -AO 31'i0' - wee '? ww.^? ? •, '• •. N C?ARA4e r?l F^Esh1GM t D/-$J A -OMC4 t° 0.20 gOrrcam OF FL1JG?u' 0 LOT 107 Po N LO 105 o?I- Z a ' ° RGDM ADbrnoW . m so•s ,? Q Z ??TORY N O U dc,. STOGICAbE 0 1.1 {? ?GJ.IGE? FQAMB N Uf t' 1041 ZONING L- 410 *4 0 . LAI .15, ?'f ??.tirZ - ?? vl O.OS• 2W 00" F A- jj2, FGM . F? f Frt ?r co NC• blw a' 777 GG ??' r? - -- ? TUS_`PATH O M ° (co o i 9 AfPWA s veiac ci,ae EfPLANNIM,, LEGAL DESCRIPTION WEST 40 FEET OF LOT 105 AND EAST 30 FEET OF LOT 107, CORRE.CIED MAP OF HARBOR OAKS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 39 PAGE 659 PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. NOTE: NOTE: EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG NORTHERN BOUNDARY AS INDICATED FLOOD ZONE C BY THE EXISTENCE OF UTILITY POLES. CITY OF CLEARWATER F.I.R.M. # 125096 PANEL A 00150 REV. JUNE 1 t 1983 tons sUt1VEY N'As rptrAnvo vmmow toll Pft f.?ot OF A tO E 9FAAC1/• ANO 09 sUBACT IO All lASIDAI Nis AND OtNER MA"Eng or 11ECono "an6Y caturY THAT TNt eumvey , (o 85 PHH • 61PPEL, MAOTELLER & KRAVET, INC. 1tEME'E ?EoHl?E NMyo, TNt /?? FLO" 0 oT I t • •NAIN??wINS •NN.Nq •U..V? flog \11• •ll\1\IpA AV?NIl?, •w\M HA/.pw, ?4owlnw glass noeEnT J. sorPEL PL9. 3 799 ?, :" - IlE'-1 - 1 1 - 95 110N 1 4 e'S D P 5 AE" 1 -20 ' v IY?RIN FCbl3'•3' ??1 - M•a'S' 130.001 ZONING o WEST 10' LOT 131 kl s1- M I N 1 f BUILDING E'BACKC F ? - FP M - STREET R.O.W. 4.6 SIDE REAR 145 42.4' 2 ' PE 23.8' M TIE 23.1' 'o CONC. FOUNDATION LAWL'ST FLOOR vi 1 0' EL- 33.13' 1S 0' ' 3.7 of ?} 40 -- b 2a of 11.0' 11.8' 2.0_ e oomf w 52.0' EAST 20' LOT 133 n 90j"'12" T, Tfa m p . 0 1 FCM4"•4i NcW-CA 4' C/T f 21.9' :r 2 8' SET N? IS-0-26 E-O.IS' 1 SET 1 EL3 CL p ? y owmm- - - _. __ - - - - - - --T DESCRIPTION: (PROVIDED) 33 AND THE (NEST 10.00 FEET OF LOT 131, AND THE EAST 20.00 FEET H 135. Of CORRECTED MAP OF HARBOR- OAKS. 71CCv1,'`''+C-fo Tf [ .MAP OR 0 43 TNEREOf AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3. PAGE 65, OF !.- ,1BLIC bLa CORNER RDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. zow: ACCORDANCE WITH F.I.R.M. MA° NUMBER 125096--0015-D, WY OF MATER. FLORIDA. ASAP REVISED 8/19/91. r..?--- C 131895 WUMARY SV".Y CEP TiFIED TO- D? a somo svRvEY ` PAR T R M&CI 10 A not KAROf FOR MA"I'? °r CEN?OA GLEAFzWAT ciwo III roam, C1 1AA me KAT. U ASS 0""m "Ono ?fi1EOM Rm •I/wOllalpl'S LOCAM 00 OO M MERTON ..? •?? .` VA" - CO&AO" 1-AND PRECISI(jN CORPORATI / 1 d /O r, 11 ?1 oA fE SU*vt 41> A s 's • 0 pppp' •tt?18H ?? "OjMtSr:n ]o SOUTwd. RAIV? :3 EAS;, "fNELLAS GOUNTI, ru4*J0A lip survey of I Are f PLAT tOLlIwSr1A7 jr J • _..__7 t G'?br » ?Ai0t?Y •? ? ? !0'tt'O! {i ''?/ • GAIL"t I ,J • \ rC L Apt. ATER $ T 90 VNU 00=PAT=0W T • C, f z,t t a o o • MAY ??l f'- I Ax f4T J' • -1 r A • Mw\? MEMO - &4Ar slow~ W) DRUID ROAD (R/ W 65j' LBOAL DafC ttPZipf, LOT 7. -conaDCm P?P oir YAamm oAKt" Acoontkw To m Lou= NO oit PLAT 792S. W. RU81 M IN ?RAT Wft 3. PAC= 63. PUBLIC a2CQWS 0V PI MIAS COMT, nORZLA. s CuTItIRB ?01 WOW s. NCKZ LV. t = «.. ?r*ww?Ar? AAA& 0 s?l1?At . aw a ws K r„r,a• r ?gna,aJ ' ,?,.?* wns ar e,?riwr ?.?.w. w ft%& .M L or I f dookowA A mwo Ur Afff -11 • ANr or ,141? Ns.?RS iAtlR.RrAA1 s \+ `'? 2WO2S3 *AM 4/24/2000 C _- G J _ C tr Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue CASE #: T 11 1 (AA-/ / lam/ Clearwater, Florida 33756 DATE RECEIVED: Telephone: 727-562-4567 RECEIVED BY (staff initials): Fax: 727-562-4576 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 4' ? SUBMIT ?2 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 11100<00 `-'.' 08 2007 OF71CIAL RECORDS AND APPEAL APPLICATION "GISLATNE SRVCS DEPT Level One and Level Two Reviews (Revised 03/29/01) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- APPLICATION/NOTICE OF APPEAL (Code Section 4-502.A & B) An appeal of a level one approval (flexible standard) may be initiated by a property owner abutting the property which is the subject of the approval within seven days of the date the development order is issued. The filing of an application/ notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. An application/ notice of appeal of appeal of any decision of the city, as provided in Section 4-501, may be initiated by the applicant or any person granted party status within 14 days of the decision. Such application shall be filed with the city clerk in a form specified by the community development coordinator identifying with specificity the basis for the appeal and accompanied by a fee as required by Section 4-202.E. The filing of an application/ notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. A. APPELLANT AND AGENT INFORMATION: APPELLANT NAME: Kiely M. Allen MAILING ADDRESS: 403 Magnolia Drive, Clearwater, FL 33756 PHONE NUMBER: 727-447-1171 FAX NUMBER: 727-444-4419 AGENT NAME: J.W. Smith Design Group, LLC MAILINGADDRESS: 35095 U.S. Highway 19 N., Suite 101, Palm Harbor, FL 34684 PHONE NUMBER: 72 7-785-4441 FAX NUMBER: 727-78c)-627c; B. APPEAL INFORMATION CHECK THE SPECIFIC APPEAL: Appeals to the Community Development Board ? Orders, requirements, decisions or determinations made by an administrative official in the administration of the development code, except for enforcement actions. ? Administrative interpretations of the development code Level One (Flexible and Minimum Standard) approval decisions ? Denials of any permit or license issued under the provisions of this Code Appeals to a hearing officer ? Decisions of the community development board regarding level two approvals ? Decisions of the community development board regarding level one approvals ? OTHER (as allowed by Code) ADDRESS OF SUBJECT APPEAL (if applicable): 403 Magnolia Drive Clearwater, FL 33756 SPECIFIC CASE NUMBER TO BE APPEALED (if applicable): FLS2007-08041 --403 Magnolia Drive DATE OF DECISION: November 1, 2007. Page 1 of 2 - Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews)- City of Clearwater C. BASIS OF APPEAL: Explain in detail the basis for the appeal. Use additional sheets if necessary. SEE ATTACHED SHEET D. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS fib application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Sworn to and subscribed before a this 9 day of N over fiber _, A. D. 20 0-1 to me and/or by DEler Painter who is personally known has produce J? /A as identification. Si ture of ro ertowner or representative Notary public, ar v4 Roger Painter, J. W Smith Design Group, LLC My commission expires: 4`,?sKATHY R. TOKOS I MY COMMISSION # DD264808 IIMS2IPDSIPlanning DepartmentOpplication Formsldevelopment reviewlAppeal Application. doc 1-800-3-NOTARY FL Notary Discount Assoc. Co. Page 2 of 2 - Appeal Application (Level One and Level Two Reviews)- City of Clearwater C. BASIS OF APPEAL: 1. On March 10, 2003 a similar request was submitted showing a 20'-8" setback on Magnolia Drive, which was approved by the Zoning and Planning Department, Public Works Administration, and the Development Services Department. Even though that was 4 years ago, the regulations have not changed. 2. It was stated to J.W. Smith that a block survey would not be required. However, it was pointed out with pictures, that certain structures were constructed within the 25' building setback requirement. 3. It was stated in the Zoning Case Summary FLS2007-08041 that 3 conditions pursuant to Section 2-203.6.1 were "not met". Code Section 3-913.A conditions were answered in writing in the submittal requirements. However, it also refers to a block survey. J.W. Smith was informed that a survey was not required. The difference between the two sections is the block survey. 4. A letter was sent by Mr. Robert Tefft, Planner III to J.W. Smith Design dated October 23, 2007 and received by J.W. Smith Design on October 25, 2007, regarding Section 2-203.6.1 a. b. & c. The letter states that evidence (such as a block survey) needs to be provided and must be received no later than noon November 1, 2007. Mrs. Allen, as stated in her e-mail to Mr. Tefft, did not receive this request until October 31, 2007. This did not allow us ample time to perform a block survey. \\server\users\patf\My Documents\Client Correspondence\Allen Variance Appeal 11-7-07.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER ycr' PLUMGDEPAMaNT Gcl) wup d aF ? POST ONCE Box 4748 ® PITNEY BOW" CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3375"748 Ou 02 1M 00.334 w5 ca 0004229492 AUG20 2007 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 33602 aLL FOTIOU, ZACHARIAS FOTIOU, MERCEDES 428 MAGNOLIA DR TJAUG CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 2 7 2001 r NIXIE 337 OE 1 00 OSY24/07 ka.r . , ...«.r....- . RETURN TO SENDER DEVELO??4i?i? , rigs : NO MAIL RECEPTACLE CITY OF CLEARAIAT171 i UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 33758474848 x'2474-03403-24-24 -??t••dt-#••.?•? ?. ??`a'.??4e 1??1!?tfll?l?„11,1,1??1??1??11r??I?I>>14?>l,?l??ll,?l?l,l?Tl CITY OF CLEARWATER ec PLANNING DEPARTMENT E;?' Posr OFFicE Box 4748 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 3 3 7 58-4748 FOTIOU, ZACHARIAS FOTIOU, MERCEDES 428 MAGNOLIA DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838 PON y,,... 9 109 IIJ W Z ?J - PITNEY BOWES $ 00.334 MI.- 000 229492 SEP19 2007 of MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 33602 a. U. NIXIE 337 DC i OO 09!.38/07 RETURN TO SENDER NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD BC: 23750474948 *0901-03194-20-03 y?Y?af????ttIIIIIII] 11111fit] tif tl7titJttltsttl?tsl?ttttl ce tsa?:?t evl