The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-08084 FLD2005-08084 400 CLEVELAND ST Date Received: 08/24/2005 ACOUA AT THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA ZONING DISTRICT: D LAND USE: CBD ATLAS PAGE: 286B PLANNER OF RECORD: R -T CLWCoverSheet OCT! 2S" /I o Clearwater Planning Department ' 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1,205.00. * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05) - PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT --- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: TH Manaciement LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 400 Cleveland Street. Suite 900. Clearwater. FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 461-0794 FAX NUMBER: (727) 461-0784 PROPERTY OWNER(S): See enclosed "Property Ownership Affidavit" (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Mr. Mark Rieker MAILING ADDRESS: 1020 N. Orlando Avenue. Suite 150. Maitland. FL 32751 PHONE NUMBER: (321) 206-4123 FAX NUMBER: (407) 628-2105 CELL NUMBER: (321) 287-5677 E-MAIL ADDRESS: mrieker riekerassociates.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 400 Cleveland Street plus new development sites as described within this application LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See enclosed Survey ?f L ?f 1 .11 LZ3 (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) E PARCEL NUMBER: See enclosed Survey (IU 2 0 2005 PARCEL SIZE: 4.06 acres. 176.646 sf (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: See enclosed Project Narrative PLANNING DEPARTMENT (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) CITY OF CLEARWATER DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See enclosed Project Narrative Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) Affidavit Attesting Ownership Enclosed D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See enclosed Project Narrative 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See enclosed Project Narrative 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or workin unthe:neighborhoo of the-proposed use. See enclosed Project Narrative 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See enclosed Project Narrative PLANNwG DEPARTMENT CITY OF WARMER 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Project Narrative 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See enclosed Project Narrative ? Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See enclosed Project Narrative Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 1 0 0 ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See enclosed Project Narrative 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See enclosed Project Narrative 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See enclosed Project Narrative 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See enclosed Project Narrative 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Project Narrative 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See enclosed Project Narrative 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See enclosed Project Narrative 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Project Narrative 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines inrDivisiorr, 5-of-Article 3-(ash pplicaEle . Use separate sheets as necessary. ? (( ?hl? ,, LL j )J See enclosed Project Narrative ?I L? DET 2 0 2005 L ??IVIIV'?7 Ur.V-1itIIVIIS 1*41 ' CITY OF CLEhlRWAIM Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria ' Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involve addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with ' the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ' ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; - Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; ' = All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. _ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ' ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): 16068tormwater plan as noted above is included ' Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND ' NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) d SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; Id TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ' id LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ' lid PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; M, k; H r-0 North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; OCT 2 0 2005 _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; PLANNING DEPARTMENT All existing and proposed points of access; CITY OF CLEARWATER All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 • Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; _ All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; _ Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; _ Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible; R E?E ;6' 2 --"FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE provide the following additional information on site plan: , One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; n?? V n ?0?? O Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; PANNING DEPARTMENT _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); CITY OF CLEARWATER Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); U., IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; Ln REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).CHM 1 ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) M ANNA NG DEPARTIM 3Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: (-ITV OP CLEARWAT • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ef/ Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): A ?'?w1` ffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this a icatio-n Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Sworn to and subscribed before me this 19th day of October , A.D. 2005 to me and/or by Mark Rieker, who i ersonally know has produced as ??C identification. J Notary public, My commission expires: 4;,Y«,, Dannette Schonher y' i • 2n MYCOMMISSION# DD223346 EXPIRES BONDED THRUTROY FAIN INSURANCE,INC Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record tide holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and its adjacent development parcels 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and c Pr erty Owner-400 leve C; by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner-Mainst a rwater , LLC; by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner-Laura Stree elop M, L by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS -5 Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 8 - -z'/6 day of August , 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke who ha ing bee first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. \?? Q?......••?F9 ??i Notary Public My Commission Expires: MISSIOryF ' o #DD 205794 ?ndedlhN???e; • OQ?w /////?/ ? ??lllll l l 1119 ? O\\, a` S:Wlanning DepertmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlftexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc iLA ?' E C t 0Cf 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 1016105 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) k;HV'?D Proposed Development Pro rg am: ?Existing 9 story office: Movie Theater: Retail: Residential: Projected value: 87,800 sf 55,000 sf 43,500 sf 245 units $200 million plus Parkin Table: Code Ratio Office (*grandfathered) 2/1000* sf Movie Theater 4/1000 sf Retail 4/1000 sf Subtotal ("Public" Spaces) Residential (Private) 1.5/unit Totals Code Min Spaces 200* 220 174 594 368 962 Development Density Calculations: 1. Non-residential uses/density calculations: Office 87,800 sf _ 4.0 FAR density = Theater 55,000 sf _ 4.0 FAR density = Retail 43,500 sf = 4.0 FAR density = Land required for non-residential uses: 2. Residential density calculations: Total Land within development parcel Less land required for non-residential uses Land available for residential use x 43,560 sf/acre = x 70 units per acre = Proposed residential density Quantity of units needed from Bonus Pool our 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Spaces Provided 200 220 174 594 619 1,213 21,950 sf land needed 13,750 sf land needed 10.888 sf land needed 46,588 sf 176,646 sf 4( 6.588) sf 130,058 sf 2.99 acres land available 209 units allowed by code 245 units 36 units DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) *Existing office parking is grandfathered at approximately 2/1000 (200 Cars). i 1 i • Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ORIGINAL PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: ' 1. The proposed development positively addresses all of the goals and objectives of the City's Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Core District. The Downtown Core District criteria encourages mixed uses to attract residential and retail activities while continuing to 1 support business uses and this project includes all of the development components desired by the City toward achieving this combination of uses. The proposed development is in harmony with the Downtown Design parameters established for the district as well as ' surrounding buildings. The Cleveland Street fagade respects the historic "main street" character with traditional architectural elements and materials. All proposed street facades are very pedestrian friendly incorporating extensive on-street retail and restaurant spaces as well as corresponding traffic calming elements where appropriate. The tower design takes its cues from the City's investment in the Public Library, and transitions the old to the new with a more contemporary fagade, but remains in keeping with the established design guidelines by incorporating step-backs as well as traditional base, middle, top features in 1 the architectural fagade. The City has identified this property as a "Superblock" site within its Redevelopment Plan, and has concluded that it is the preferred location for a multi-plex movie theater and entertainment complex combined with public parking uses that support the Coachman Park Master Plan as well as future plans for the Harborview Center property. All of these development components are included in the proposed development plans submitted herein. 1 The proposed development is in harmony with the adjacent properties in many significant ways as described below: 1 • The predominant scale and character of the street facade along the historic Cleveland Street corridor has been maintained architecturally and contextually. We have incorporated traditional architectural features and materials such as textured precast concrete, dimensional stone inlays, granite base elements, heavy cornices, storefront retail glass, and awnings and canopies. We have revised the height of the facade directly on Cleveland Street as recommended in the DRC ' comments by limiting the height to that of the adjacent building to the east, and stepping back from the predominant facade approximately 6' to the theater facade. This has enabled us to incorporate a balcony area on the south side of the theater building. • The Osceola Ave. facade (at the Theater/Retail building) respects the scale of both the Harborview Center and the Public Library. In addition, the proposed development integrates a recladded facade on the office building to complete the architectural composition with repeated features, materials, canopies, awnings and window patterns. 1 • The parking garage podium is 8 stories tall due to the combined parking requirements for the proposed development plus the public/office/theater/retail parking component (roughly 3.5 stories each). Although this may be beyond the 1 optimum scale in relationship to adjacent properties, it represents an opportunity to displace street parking in favor of potentially expanded parks and recreation areas. Over the course of the last year, many options were studied by both the- developer and the City, and it was determined that this design generates the" C greatest common good for the City. t 1?,. l 2 0 2005 PLANNI 4 DEPAQUENT r 31V op 1-f 1: 7171 , Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ' PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites ORIGINAL ' • The pedestrian scale of the proposed development is in keeping with the Downtown Design Guidelines and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. We have ' revised the Laura Street and N. Ft. Harrison Street facades to incorporate the requisite 75% minimum frontage for principal facade treatments. All street facades now include similar architectural treatments, new streetscaping, and ' extensive pedestrian activity zones to enhance the development as a destination. 0 The overall size, character, density and coverage of the proposed development is in keeping with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the Design Guidelines, the ' City's Economic Development Goals and Objectives, and similar development projects recently approved by the CRA in the Clearwater Downtown Core. For example, the Water's Edge project, located just half a block away from this development site, is quite similar in many respects, and actually incorporates ' greater development density than this site on a per acre of land basis. Although this development is taller than any other currently proposed in the Downtown Core, it is the location specifically determined to be most appropriate within the ' Redevelopment Plan for achieving significant revitalization and rebirth through a targeted mixed use destination type development, plus there are no height limitations, and the proposed development meets virtually every goal major ' articulated in the Plan document. ' 2. The proposed development will contribute significantly to the revitalization of downtown, and will provide a community atmosphere where residents can live, work, and recreate, all within walking distance of their front door. It also creates an attractive downtown destination ' for visitors and the public with ample parking and a variety of potential activities including enjoying outdoor events at Coachman's Park, convention center activities, library visits, personal training/fitness, restaurants and first run movies. Without question, the proposed development will enhance property values regionally and spur additional local development opportunities. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing ' or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Considering the nature of the proposed development, the region will certainly benefit from a more inviting, affluent and secure environment for workers, residents and visitors alike. ' 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Separate entrances and exits are incorporated into the parking garage for the separate user groups. Residential d i i ill con om n um owners w enter at the northwest corner of the garage on Osceola Street, and ° all others will enter at the northeast corner of the garage on Fort Harrison Street. A drop-off c v feature is incorporated into the entry area of the residential building, and additional traffic li f i id d b f d ff d i k i =-= p ' Lq cQ re e s prov y way o e rop-o an p c -up opportun ties on Laura Street for restaurant and theater patrons. As exhibited in the above parking table, parking is adequate for all proposed uses, and is further enhanced by allowing the office parking spaces to be accessed h bli b d i d d b i C:D ' y t e pu c ur ng non-stan ar us ness periods. This results in a total of 595 parking ' spaces available for public uses during evenings and weekends, providing highly desired relief for the City to reduce the parking demand on surface parking lots surrounding the Library and Harborview Center. The benefits to the City include enhanced opportunities for ' the future redevelopment of these sites, plus long-term revenue opportunities generated by the City owned parking stalls. 1 • 0 ORIGINAL Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 1016105 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites 1 . The proposed development is located within the Downtown Core character district of the 1 downtown redevelopment plan. This Vision established for the district includes high density and mixed use development consisting specifically of the types we are proposing for this site. This is accomplished without sacrificing the objective of maintaining a pedestrian-friendly environment and an architectural style respectful to the historic fabric of Clearwater. The 1 proposed development honors the principal elements of the City's vision for the district while setting a stage for high quality development on surrounding parcels. 1 6. The proposed development contains a variety of permitted and encouraged uses as described within Downtown Redevelopment Plan. These uses include residential dwellings, retail and restaurant uses, office uses, health club facilities, and first run movie theaters. Although the 1 combination of independent venues will certainly introduce a wide range of operating hours and sensory experiences, all of the uses are considered to be Class A in nature and intended to complement one another, thus avoiding adverse effects to either internal or external users 1 patrons or neighbors The proposed development is located on one of the key redevelopment parcels identified in the City's downtown core redevelopment plan, and considerable effort and care have been taken to comply with or exceed all of the City's objectives for the site. 1 We have accomplished this in the true spirit of a public-private partnership which has resulted in the successful incorporation of the multi-plex movie theater venue, and public parking component within the proposed development. 1 The design of the proposed project minimizes the adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory effect and hours of operation impacts in the following manner: • Potentially adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory effects emanating from the 1 parking garage are mitigated by providing solid concrete walls at adjacent property lines, using visual screening at naturally ventilated opeing, providing specially shielded light fixtures at the garage perimeter and incorporating 1 mechanical ventilation systems to ensure that fumes do not transfer out. • All mechanical equipment is architecturally screened. • Hours of operation impacts are minimized by including complementary uses 1 including office and retail spaces for daytime functions, theater and restaurant spaces for evening and weekend functions and residential for ongoing activity, economic vitality and security within the downtown core. 1 G OCT 2 0 2005 ' PLOWING DEPARTMENT ' CRY OF CLEARWATER • • ORIGINAL Fl bl l t A l D C h I fll P ication _ exi eve opmen pp e ompre ensive n roject ' PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 1016105 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites ' COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA: 1. The redevelopment of the parcel is economically impractical without deviations to the ' intensity and development standards. Although greater density bonuses were originally contemplated by the City for sites within the downtown core, the proposed development is requesting just 36 additional dwelling units to meet the density needs of the project. ' Greater density bonuses, although desirable in terms of economic feasibility, would have necessitated an increase in building height, and although the district guidelines contain no height limitations per se, certain sensitivities to this subject have been historically ' prevalent in the City, and this knowledge has detracted from the developer's desire to request density bonuses beyond what is absolutely necessary to make the project viable. In addition to density bonuses, the project is negotiating TIF funding with the CRA to compensate for the added parking to be owned and operated by the City. The TIF funding will provide for the design and construction of the City owned spaces as well as reasonable allocations for the cost of land and development soft costs. 2. The proposed comprehensive infill project will contribute to the redevelopment goals for downtown with fully developed project values estimated to be in excess of $200 million overall. This value represents the direct impact of the project only. It is also anticipated ' that an indirect effect on surrounding areas will include significant additional capital investment which will further enhance the positive impact of future tax increment to the ' City. 3. The proposed uses for the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are both permitted and encouraged by the City of Clearwater. Each proposed use is clearly identified in the ' redevelopment plan and other documents published by the City of Clearwater and the Economic Development Department. ' 4. The uses within the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses and the downtown redevelopment plan's vision statements. Cleveland Street has been maintained as a primary "Main Street" retail corridor with entries to the movie theaters, restaurant locations, and an internal retail "mall". The street fagade on Osceola Street is pedestrian friendly, incorporates street retail frontage, and takes full advantage of the outstanding views to the bay with extraordinary restaurant locations incorporating outdoor seating at the western terminus of Laura Street. The ' residential component will enhance the community aspect of downtown and provide an immediately accessible demographic for the support of the movie theaters and restaurant and retail establishments in the area. ' 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the w LU comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of U-) Clearwater. This development site offers unique opportunities to satisfy the amount of e `~ contiguous space needed for movie theaters and destination-type retail/restaurant spaces. The design of these spaces has been carefully planned to provide for the greatest C\2 C) ' accessibility and value to the public, which will in turn enhance their long-term viability. _ (D LL o Z 6. The proposed development creates a new destination for downtown with attributes not P-M 0 ' presently available to either residents or visitors. The impact of these new development U attributes will be both immediate and positive upon commencement of use. 0 Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ' PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites ORIGINAL 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for the development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The architectural style was carefully chosen in concert with the City to reflect the more contemporary context provided by the new Public Library and the recently completed bridge to Clearwater Beach. This departure from a more traditional style for the residential tower was a conscious choice intended to differentiate this development from some of the standard fare of architecture in the area. However, the tower design needed to integrate with the more traditional street facades and architectural fabric stipulated in the Downtown Design Guidelines. The proposed development combines these aspects of the architecture extremely well without sacrificing architectural substance. The result is a statement of beauty in the Clearwater skyline that will remain as a timeless masterpiece likely to become the most recognizable icon for the City of Clearwater for years to come. This is a building that the City will embrace both for its appearance, and for its contribution to the revitalization of downtown as a place to live, work and play. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development meets all of the design and community development standards associated with these criteria. As evidenced by the information presented within this Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application, its various attachments, the design documents, and the responses to the specific DRC questions, the proposed development complies with current Redevelopment Plan Guidelines and other pertinent requirements without the need for extensive additional flexibility except as follows. The project is elevated in height due to the public parking component, but the long term benefit to the City justifies this. We have submitted a vacation request to an existing alley. This is due to the fact that the development will cover the alley and render unusable for other purposes. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available in order to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See the Parking Table presented at the beginning of the Project Narrative for evidence of the adequacy of the parking provided. 10. Extensive architectural efforts coupled with numerous project workshops and coordination meetings have resulted in a cooperatively produced design that fully responds to the newly 4Z ek adopted Downtown Design Guidelines. The architectural style and materials remain L U L traditional at the pedestrian level and the Cleveland Street facade is consistent in scale and ?., context in order to maintain the desired street feel. The theater entry respects the N ?! centerline and curvature of the newly designed traffic-calming node incorporated into the City's streetscape design (located at the mid-block section of Cleveland Street). This P-1 -9 cat C] creates a main focal point and enhances the drama and excitement of the theater and retail ' tD U. facade, while bringing a new sense of place to downtown. Other major street facades O Z (Osceola and Fort Harrison Streets) are designed to ensure that the scale, design, and building materials remain consistent with the guidelines; they incorporate street-fronted (??? (; 0 0 Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ORIGINAL ' PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites ' retail spaces, provide new streetscape and landscape improvements, and focus on pedestrian activities and parking needs. The residential tower incorporates step-backs in ' the fagade and provides a successful transitioning from its more traditionally styled base to a more contemporary middle and top. The design and positioning of the tower's entry features and ground floor retail and restaurant spaces are in direct consideration of the planned future expansion of Coachman Park. To enhance the overall development and its attractiveness to retail and theater patrons, a public parking component has been incorporated with 560 total spaces available for them, 360 of which are to be owned and operated by the City. ? V E-z: D 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' CITY OF CLEARWATER 7 r ? • Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ' PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses ORIGINAL CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites r SIGNAGE (Division 19. SIGNS/ Section 3-1806) ' 1. No existing freestanding or attached signs are intended to remain in place in the proposed development. 2. A comprehensive sign program will be developed independently and will address wayfinding signage, building signage, tenant signage, monument signage, etc. The applications for the Comprehensive Sign Program will be submitted at a later date due ' to project size and requirements for detailed design work related to the architectural package. This item was discussed with the Planning Department in advance of the preparation of this application package. 1 RIU OCT 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARATER 8 o Planning Doment 100 learwater, South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Clearwater C Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans * NOTE: a total of 15 sets of this application and all supporting documentation is Level Two Flexible Development Application. CASE N! DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: required to be submitted in conjunction with a complete ORIGINAL PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 02/14/05) --- PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: TH Management LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 400 Cleveland Street. Suite 900. Clearwater. FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727.461.0794 FAX NUMBER: 727.461.0784 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): 400 Cleveland. LLC: Mainstreet Clearwater Development. LLC: Laura Street Development, LLC (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Mr. Mark Rieker MAILING ADDRESS: 1020 N. Orlando Avenue. Suite 150. Maitland. FL 32751 PHONE NUMBER: 321.206.4123 FAX NUMBER: 407.628.2105 CELL NUMBER: 321.287.5677 E-MAIL ADDRESS: mrieker(cbriekerassociates.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See enclosed survey n -C-1 2 0 Rgs PARCEL SIZE: 4.06 acres. 176.646 sf P. _ (acres, square feet) I LM141141t%.7 ? L114 411 CITY OF CLEARWATER HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? 36 HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? n/a IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES X NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: Page 1 of 2 nRinINIA1 11111111111IF 11111W PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENITY TO BE PROVIDED (attach photographs, drawings, etc, as applicable): Extensive Public Amenities are included within the proposed development as follows: 245 Residential Dwelling Units 10 Screen Movie Theater (first run movies) Streetscape improvements' on Osceola Street. Fort Harrison Street and Laura Street (see enclosed plans for locations) Wayfinding Plans in keeping with current downtown Clearwater standards (styles may vary slightly) 42.500 sf of downtown retail space, including contiguous areas designed to support destination retail/restaurants !F=?N q= ?- mN i 1J\V L1) ACT 2 n 7005 R ???r+,nn??? nrnA?'????A,3 i"'d.l'"rI V ? V'I ? V i? i/d?i rU? ? ? V i r.+ v . CRY OF 07EARWAlER note: all streetscape improvements are consistent in appearance and materials with City streetscape plan C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize CAY-zepresentatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative (see enclosed "Affidavit to Authorize Agent") STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Sworn to and subscribed before me this -19th day of October , A.D. 20 05rte-mss d/or by Mark Rieker who i pers nally known bas--pFedased ..satiep- ll - irk Notary public, My commission expires: Dannette Schonher =* ' MY COMMISSION # DD223346 EXPIRES ;,QO= August 7, 2007 "'•%}? Pc F,,oBONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application.doc Page 2 of 2 • • ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and its adjacent development parcels 2. That this properly constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (hasthave) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tru Tgect. Property Owner Kevin Burke, Manager Kevin Burke, Man Property Owner-Laura Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA LLC; by COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this O a? a day of _AAyust , 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke who aving een first duly swom ' Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed ?_? v?1p11111111//?/?j \\ My Commission Expires: ? ? ? \ 101PW I // Notary Public P ? ' \\\ , " ? gay 31, POp> 9N So ?, #DD 205794 ; a Ondedk' j- Pliblic 00 N" D CE I , ' S:IP/anning DepartmentlApplication Formsldeve/opme% ll?yl??tleve/opment comprehensive infill application 2005.doc OCT 2 0 2005 ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT CJ1Y OF CL&MMER ' Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater R 1 1 10 ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER Public Works Administration - Engineering Department FORM NUMBER 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Room 220 1311-0104 P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Ph.: 727 562-4750 Fax: 727 562-4755 VACATION REQUEST FILING FORM NB.&: Responses to Items I - 9 are required. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: Name: (-?1- lir C V1 C1 i v1P ? ?i ?tg ?(Vi CeS , (/JC Phone:. J ?J Address: Vy % r L12 (GWi S+ IEEE HEREBY PETITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE VACATION OF THE FOLLOWING: ? EASEMENT TYPE: ? STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ALLEY ? OTHER: 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED: fee- orb c(dted 64, 't5 C6r S6?tc= 7 ? Jes&iPtrdh, OCT 2 0 2005 3. STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION: qOC% C eoelcrod -S <- 2'U'D C17 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 4. PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY: 141,;<ed u5e- o??c'O?vriL1/?t?IS> etc?i ?? Y??Sfn?tVc??? ak-d 777e f e, 5. ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY: North: D South: -D East: West: 40 Printed on recycled paper Page 1 Revised 6/24/2005 ORIGINAL 6. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS: ' a. Proof of Property Ownership b. Land Survey of Property ' c. Site Plan showing Proposed Use of Vacated Property ' d. Filing Fee per Ordinance No. 5969-96: ($500.00 for a Right-of-Way/alley or $400.00 for an Easement) 7. THE FOLLOWING FOUR LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION ARE REQUIRE l.D:_? a. Progress Energy C ?L V, EkD ' b. Verizon Florida, Inc. O U 2 0 2005 ' c. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. PLANNING DEPARTMENT d. Bright House CITY OF CLEARWAIER 8. NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER (PLEASE PRINT) (see 01CLDSE D Af:P1 DAVt t- ID AUTtMli ? Same as Applicant MAFO ' Name: MAtiL W. R15yZic. Phone: 21yv *R23 Address: C 9. OW NE SIGNATU Date: Z& - 05' NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of dax J 0 05 -, by N& i, k , who i personally known to me or has produced as identification. (Type of identification) My Commission expires: r Name of notary typed, printed or stamped: Saundra Everhart - 1j'e r ha t± -•c Commission # DD353934 Expires tft , 2008 B- Mad Troy fain - Ins ? 2M36&7019 ~J Printed on recycled paper Page 2 Revised 6/24/2005 ? 0 ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and its adjacent development parcels 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true Property LLC; by Kevin Burke, Manager rroperty owner- ainstreet c Development, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Man - Property Owner-Laura S t Develo ant, LLC• by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 9/A ?3 6 ?5- day of Amust , 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. % ??001111i11Ntt// My Commission Expires: § y NAPy6"N/' ISS10 • ®°m •yr= z S61. #DD 205794 : Q ?ye0?dedlhN STATE`` SAPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsidevelopmant revl'??ldlb!lii l?8velopment comprehensive infill application 2005.doc 1 11-1 D C1. K 12 0 2005 PLANNING DIMAXIMENT CITY OF CCEARW?`-Tc-R Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater r g ? e 01 LAURA P.O.Q ItW. Corner Lot 7 STREET (P+F) DWG. NO.: 506402Sketch.dw 10' Alley Vacation SKETCH and DESCRIPTION Y NOT A SURVEY ' FOR: Rieker and Associates PROJECT NO. 508402 DRAWING# 506402sketd SCALE N.T.S. FOREST ND LAKES B0 M NC- 111 OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 BOUNDARY-TOPOGRAPHIC-CONSTRUCTION STAKEOUT PH: (813) 854-1342 FAX (813) 855-6890 SECTION 16 - TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH - RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA NOT TO SCALE 2 0 200 PLANNING DEPA,R MEAT CITY OF CLFAIWAMrI? 13lJF11YU01 '8 CERMCATE I hereby certify this SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION to be the graphic depiction made by me, or under my direct supervision, on the date(s) shown, which meets the MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS set forth by the FLORIDA BOARD, OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS and MAPPERS in C?ldpter 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, ant to Secpn 1472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. ,, 11 n /+ 1"` i? XlSEAW KELLY 01 McCLLING DATE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR and MAPPER(0 CLEVELAND STREET DESCRIPTION- A portion of the 10 foot alley lying between Lots 1 & 2 and Lots 7 & 8, 'of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence S00'14'53"W, along the east right-of-way line of Osceola Street, a distance of 123.67 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S 88'29'10" E, along the southerly line of said lots 7 and 8, a distance of 100.17 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 8; thence S 00°06'07" W, a distance of 10.17 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence N 88'24'13" W, along the northerly line of said Lots 1 and 2, a distance of 100.21 feet; thence N 00'17'34" E, along the east right-of-way of Osceola Street, a distance of 10.03 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel contains 1012 square feet, more or less. , LEGEND NO SCALE FND R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY SCIR 1 4513' ry CENTERUNE FIR HWY NIGHWAY FCIR NOTED) BLVD BOULEVARD FRR NO. NUMBER PK POB POINT OF BEGINNING FCM !ZE NOTED) POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT FOP ISIZE No D D DESCRIPTION FPP (SIZE NOTE ) F FIELD MEASURED FNd?D • O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS (BOOK) SN&D 13 PC PAGE PLS PB PLAT BOOK LB P UL ! 2 0 2005 PLANNING CITYOF C NOTES-- 1 . THIS IS A SKETCH AND. DESCRIPTION. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. BASIS OF BEARING: THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA STREET BEING SO0°14'53"W, ASSUMED. 3. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR MATTERS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. 4. THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND 5. REFERENCE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR DESCRIPTION. 2d2 • ORIGINAL ADDRESSES OF UTILITY COMPANIES NOTE: Ask the utility companies listed below to provide you with a letter of "NO OBJECTION" for your proposed vacation request. Provide each a survey of your property showing the area of the street right-of-way, alley or easement proposed to be vacated. Be sure to submit the original signed version of the no objection letters with your vacation application. Progress Energy 2166 Palmetto Street Info: (727) 562-5751 Building "F" Fax: (727) 562-5686 E Clearwater FL 33765 s on ContactPers` Phone ` O eration Area Jeanne Talhouk (727) 562-3903 . Sunset Point Rd. north to Curlew Rd. west of U.S. 19 . Gulf to Bay Blvd. north to Sunset Point Rd. between Belcher Rd. and Highland Ave. • All of Clearwater Beach Rene' Martin (727) 562-5662 . S.R. 580 north to Curlew Rd. east of U.S. 19 . Sunset Point Rd. north to S.R. 580 east of Belcher Rd. e Belleair Road north to Sunset Point Rd. east of U.S. 19 Craig Kopkau (727) 562-5660 . Belleair Rd. north to Gulf to Bay Blvd. from U.S. 19 to Highland Ave. Verizon Florida, Inc. MC: FLCW5033 Info: (727) 562-1193 1280 E. Cleveland Street Fax: (727) 562-9614 riParwntPr_ FT. 337 5 CointactPerson Phone` Operation Area . Vickie Singleton 727 562-1126 . Ci ide Knology Broadband of FLSP 2144 Fax: (727) 217-2649 3001 Gandy Blvd. N. Florida. Inc. PinPllnc Pnrk_ FT- 33792 Contact Person Phone O eration Area Jay Young (727) 239-0156 Office 727 235-1553 Cell e Citywide Bright House 700 Carillon Parkway Ct_ PPterchnra_ FT- 33716 Fax: (727) 329-2845 Contact Person Phone O erationArea ; . Scott Creasy 727 329-2817 . North of Belleair Rd. Sherelle Darroch 727 803-5061 . South of Belleair Rd. 1 R1 E C Y', i E', DU CJ Printed on recycled paper OCT 2 0 2005 Page 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Revised 7/12/2005 CI1 Y OF W AiiIA PMER Horthside Eg#.aw" m' e&le, August 23, 2005 Mr. Barry Ritz Progress Energy 2166 Palmetto Street, Building "F" Clearwater, FL 33765 Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Ritz: CIVIL LAI'41D PLANNING ENV'1 RONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION ORIGINAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your immedtate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. Housh Ghovaee, CEO 601 CLEVND k,W?bI-rE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MIND5PRIN6.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ? f 4 OCT 2 0 2055 PLAN N11 9tiG DE.PA 2? [-NT U Y OF CLFAMIMA J E'R • • • Horthsine sw 10) ,?/3?rq e ?l?;a I7be" August 23, 2005 Mr. Jay Young Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. 3001 Gandy Boulevard North Pinellas Park, FL 33782. Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Young: CIVIL • LANG} PLANNIN` • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near fixture of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your immgtigte attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. S cgf ely, Housh Ghovaee, CEO 601 CLEVRS?*ND ST kNeMbITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NE5ADP,4tIN@t?NINDSPRIN6.COM NE5TECH@MIND5PR1N6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 ?\ jj1 , 1 DD uc-1 2 0 2005 pLANNIZG DEPART W1EvT CITY OF WEARTXP ER orthsifle ,V,e"wo y Sew w 9w. CIVIL • LAND PLANNING 0 ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL August 23, 2005 Mr. Scott Creasy Bright House 700 Carillon Parkway St. Petersburg, FL 33716 Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Creasy: Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE' S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your immediate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. //bush ;el , RI=0 ID Ghovaee, CEO 001 2 n 2005 601 CLEVEt -ND 144?4!k>e6ITE 430 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@M INDSPRIN6.COM NES TECHQMINDSPRIN6.COM 727 • ddb . 7R/.O [AU 777 . ddfi • AMA PLANNING DE-2RRIT6il ENT CITY OF CLFARI;oNlr fER orthside OPWIM9. cu*100, • CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVI R0114MENTAL • TRANSPORTATION. • ORIGINAL August 23, 2005 Ms. Vickie Singleton Verizon Florida, Inc. 1280 E. Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Vacation Request Correction Ms. Singleton: Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-l, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineenng Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your immediate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. Y? Ghovaee, CEO 601 CLEACXND 3TRWAITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESA.DPAI N@A/\I N DS PRI NG.COPA N ESTECH@Mi N D5 PRi N6.COM 727 - 443 • 2869 FAX 727 - 446 • 8036 U(: f 2 0 2005 PLAN1NNG DEPPA [i Maw .CITY OFCLEA WRIER 1 Progress Energy ' SEP 19 2005 9/15/05 Housh Ghovaee - Northside Engineering ' ORIGINAL ' 601 Cleveland St. Clearwater, FL 33755 t Re: Easement Vacate Request, Earl and Tate's Subdivision, Osceola St/Laura St. Dear Mr. Ghovaee: ' Thank you for advising us of subject proposed project. ' Progress Energy has no objections. Progress Energy has no objection provided an easement is granted or ' retained along the northern edge of said ROW for existing and future facilities. ' _X- Progress Energy has no objections provided applicant bears the expense for relocation of any Progress Energy facilities to to maintain service to customers affected by the proposed vacation. ' In order to properly evaluate this request, Progress Energy will need detailed plans of facilities proposed for subject area. ' X Pro ress Ener has facilities within this area which ma - - g gY Y t conflict with subject project. Please refer any further correspondence and pre-construction meeting notifications to ' me at the below address or you can contact me by phone at (727) 588-7439. Sincerely, ' PROGRESS ENERGY EJ=C,F3 e 7? Oz?, Barry Ritz .,?,? ' Clearwater Operatio s OCT 2 0 2005 ' pLPANING DEPARTMENT CIT1( OF CLEARINKIER ' Walsingham Engineering • 12600 Walsingham Rd.* Largo • Florida 33774 • (727)588-7431 .4 Florida Progress Company KNOLOGY0 T e l e p h o n e C a b l e TV I n t e r n e t September 15, 2005 Housh Ghovaee, CEO Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St., Suite 930 Clearwater, F133755 RE: Vacation Request Dear Mr. Ghovaee: Thank you for advising us of the subject proposed plat / vacation of easement/R.O.W. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. has no objection. _X_ In order to properly evaluate this request, Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. will need detailed plans of facilities proposed for the subject area. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. has facilities within this area which may conflict with the subject project. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. has no objections provided easements for our facilities are granted or retained as shown on the attached drawing or applicant bears the expense for relocation of any Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. facilities to maintain service to customers affected by the proposed vacation. Please refer any further correspondence and-pre-construction meeting notices to: Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. { Bill King Construction Supervisor 3001 Gandy Blvd. N. Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Notes: Active subscriber at 400 Cleveland St, suite 4 requires continuous service. Sincer ? y, ,Steve R Fitzpa ric Field Engineer Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. 727-239-0155 Office 727-217-2649 Fax KBF FORM 'B' 12/31/03 (T=Z\ , 1_ ; C I , L ,' PLANNING'DE?r 71MENT CITY OF CLEARNIATER 3001 Gandy Boulevard North • Pinellas Park, FL 33782 • www.knology.com 09/06/2005 15:53 72744680 NORTHSIDE ENG S9* PAGE 02/02 08125105 07:39 FAX 6fi4 1 TainPa.-South-IFS l¢JU1 14 -1 P Veriaon Florida Ina 1280 Cleveland St FLOW 5033 r'Ic?n..gi?r !t 7 7;SF?o?x (127j 98,2.1 102 it t Z-7) 365-6sa3 Mobile Fam"S: 17271982-9613 August 5, 2005 Via Facsimile Mr. Housh Ghovase, CEO a01 Cleveland Stree4 Suite sap Clearwater, FL 33755 ORIGINAL RE: Vacation of Public Right of Way Ten (10) feat allay, south of Laura Street & north Cleveland St.; a portion between I-ots 1 & 2. and Lcft 7 & a of F-ARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION: Plat Bock H-1. Page 20 P16allas County, Flodds Dear Mr, Ghavaee VERIZON Florida, Inc. will require easements as indicated on the attached plat. VERIZON Florida, Inc requires no additional easements. VERIZCN Florida, Inc. does object to the above referenced right of way vacation. This Is necasaw. as we have buried cables in the existing rights of way. which needs to be mak t7ained. VERiZON Florida. Inc. has no objection to the above referenced vacate. XXXX VERIZAN Florida. Inc. has no objection to the above referenced vacate providing an easement is maintained for the existing facilities presently located within the above referenced Iwblic right-ofway ar providing we are raimbursed for the reiocatton of our 'facilities to a now Lotion. Please call me if you have any questions or need any additional information at (727) 562.1102. ftoerely, Poom r nriv Johnson SPeciafist Network Engineerinq Support I? ', 11! i O U 2 0 2005 A part of Verizon CpWmjon pLAHNNG DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLUMRIMER )rthsifle. October 13, 2005 Mr. Bill King Construction Supervisor Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. 3001 Gandy Boulevard North Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Vacation Request Dear Mr. King: 0 CIVIL 0 LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONN\ENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL On August 21, 2005, we submitted information to Knology asking for a letter of no objection for a vacation request. Your response on September 15, 2005, stated that in order for Knology to properly evaluate this request, you needed detailed plans for facilities proposed for the subject Enclosed herewith is a set of our civil drawings and survey for your review. Also included is a demolition plan for your review. Upon receipt of our drawings, we ask that you review them at your earliest convenience so we may move forward with the City of Clearwater's Planning process. We understand there is an active subscriber at 400 Cleveland Street, Suite 4 who requires continuous service. After review of the plans, we would like to meet to discuss possible alternatives of re-routing the lines. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. I look forward to hearing from you. 40 Mark Rieker PLAHNNG DEPART IMENT CITY OF CLEARMAYTI ER 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MI NDSPRINC.COtA 727 - 443 - 2869 FAX 727 - 446 - 8036 Doreen A. Williams Project Director Of" 1 2.0 2005 RECF:TVRD o r T 1 7 2005 BY: B?/er s Chuck Butler 7011 75th St. N. Pinellas Park, Fl., 33781 Ph.# (727) 544-0445 Fax # (727) 541-5027 E-mail: butlersnursery(wmsn.com chuckbutler(a),tampabay.rr.com Tree Inventory Aqua ORIGINAL OCT RECE?V:j?-D 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITYOFCIEARWgER As required by the City of Clearwater, I have completed an assessment of all trees (8" dbh or greater) on the subject site and within 25' beyond the property lines. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability (rating of 1-5) and any potential hazards of these trees. # size/tvne • ratinty/comments 1 15" Live Oak 3, over-pruning, mechanical damage, dead-wood in interior 2 14" Live Oak 4 3 19" Live Oak 4, Co-dominate 4 19" Live Oak 3, Co-dominate, dead branches in interior 5 13" Live Oak 3 6 40" Live Oak 5, Co-dominate 7 20" Live Oak 4, Compacted roots 8 20" Sabal Palm 4 9 13" Sabal Palm 3 10 24" Sabal Palm 3 11 12" Washin tonia palm 3 12 17" Sabal Palm 3 13 18" Eugenia 3 14 12" Ficus 4 15 28" Live Oak 3, In wires, interior dead wood, Co-dominate 16 18" Live Oak 3, Included bark, interior dead-wood 17 24" Sabal Palm 4 18 12" Sabal Palm 3 19 8" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 20 18" Sabal Palm 3 ? ORIGINAL 21 14" Live Oak 2, Growing in fence 22 11" Sabal Palm 3 23 15" Sabal Palm 3 24 12" Sabal Palm 3 25 9" Sabal Palm 3 26 18" Sabal Palm 4 27 10,15 Laurel Oak 4, Co-dominate 28 8" Queen Palm 2, Almost dead 29 23" Sabal Palm 3 30 18" Live Oak 4, Included bark, some dead-wood 31 18" Orchid 3, Interior decay 32 8" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 33 9" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 34 8" Black Pine 3, Machanical damage 35 15" Live Oak 4, Minor dead-wood 1 E I I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Sincerely, Chuck Butler, Certified Arborist, Certificate #FL-1235A OCT 2 0 2005 PLANNWG D1?1? ENT CITY OF CLEFR Horthsige 5q'4("'5Mx&a 910, CIVIL• LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL 0 TRANSPORTATION • ORIGINAL STORMWATER REPORT FOR: C. W. ACQUA AT THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA PROJECT RECEIVED 01' 0 2,21 "i PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATFR 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRINC.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Ram A. Goel.. , B.E. 4743.1 . 3 Z ae a age p ??axae?ass? October, 2005 Project No. 0543 • • DRAINAGE NARRATIVE FOR C.W. ACQUA ORIGINAI The proposed construction activities consist of construction of 245 residential units and office and retail space with related utility and road infrastructure and results in the following: • REMOVAL of 131,765 S.F. existing impervious vehicular use, existing building and sidewalk area • Construction of 162,500 S.F. impervious vehicular use, building and sidewalk area • This will yield a 30,735 S.F. INCREASE of total impervious area. Runoff from both the eastern and western parcels will be conveyed into the retention vault by a combination of sheet flow and drainage tiles collecting gutter downspouts that discharge towards the vault. 3/4 " water quality treatment over the entire 176,646 sf project area equal to a volume of 11,040 cf is provided in the proposed retention vault at a design high water elevation of 30.50. The treatment volume is recovered through a 6" socked perforated pvc underdrain and is recovered within 22.7 hours after the storm event. The roof drains from the south building will be connected to the 36" RCP pipe in the right-of-way via manhole. .r RECEIVED OCT 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL PROJECT NAME:' C.W. ACQUA DOWNTOWN ' PROJECT NO.: 0543 VAULT STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.V. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 31.25 3,087 0.071 13,892 30.50 3,087 0.071 11,576 29.50 3,087 0.071 8,489 29.00 3,087 0.071 6,946 28.50 3,087 0.071 5,402 28.50 3,087 0.071 5,402 28.00 3,087 0.071 3,859 27.50 3,087 0.071 2,315 26.75 3,087, 0.071 0 VAULT No. 1 WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = 176,646 SF REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.75 IN REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 11,040 CF PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = 30.50 FT AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = RECEIVA® 11,576 CF 0CT 2 0 1005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • ORIGINAL NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: C.W. ACQUA DOWNTOWN PROJECT NO.: 0543 VOLUME PROVIDED = BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. _ BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. _ UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. _ K= LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 11,576 C.F. 30.50 26.75 26.00 0.09 FT/MIN 90 FT 6 INCH POND AREA (SF) = POND AREA (SF) = 3,087 S.F. 3,087 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HG FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 30.50 3,087 3.78 0.94 2.75 1.38 141 17.49 2,894 166 29.56 3,087 2.84 0.94 2.75 1.03 141 13.15 2,894 220 28.63 3,087 1.91 0.94 2.75 0.69 141 8.82 2,894 328 27.69 3,087 0.97 0.94 2.75 0.35 141 4.48 2,894 646 26.75 3,087 TIME 1,360 MINUTES TIME = 22.7 HOURS ?E?fwIVET) OCT 2 0 205 0 CA'?R 41cm r ORIGINAL 11 ?5 FLD2005-08084 400 CLEVELAND ST Date Received: 08/24/2005 ACOUA AT THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA ??I, ZONING DISTRICT: D ILA ND USE: CBD OCT o s 20M ATLAS PAGE: 286B PLANNER OF RECORD: R -T CLWCoverSheet Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 0 ORIGINAL CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: (3 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1,205.00. * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: TH Management LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 400 Cleveland Street. Suite 900. Clearwater. FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 461-0794 FAX NUMBER: (727) 461-0784 PROPERTY OWNER(S): See enclosed "Property Ownership Affidavit" (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Mr. Mark Rieker MAILING ADDRESS: 1020 N. Orlando Avenue. Suite 150, Maitland. FL 32751 PHONE NUMBER: (321) 206-4123 FAX NUMBER: (407) 628-2105 CELL NUMBER: (3211 287-5677 E-MAIL ADDRESS: mrieker0riekerassociates.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 400 Cleveland Street plus new development sites as described within this application LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See enclosed Survey (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) _ PARCEL NUMBER: See enclosed Survey IF -- PARCEL SIZE: 4.06 acres. 176.646 sf (acres, square feet) OCT 0 6 200 PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: See enclosed Proiect Narrative ; (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) PLANNING j.? Cr:'rI.OFM^NI CITY QF Qj ?'V44 I DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See enclosed Project Narrative Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 • CRIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) Affidavit Attesting Ownership Enclosed D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) ? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See enclosed Proiect Narrative 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See enclosed Project Narrative 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See enclosed Protect Narrative 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See enclosed Project Narrative 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Project Narrative 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See enclosed Project Narrative ? Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical with and development standards. See enclosed Project Narrative OCT 0 6 2005 Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater R t 0 ORiGAAI_ 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See enclosed Project Narrative 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See enclosed Project Narrative 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See enclosed Project Narrative 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See enclosed Protect Narrative 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Protect Narrative 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See enclosed Project Narrative 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See enclosed Project Narrative 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Proiect Narrative 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Divisi Use separate sheets,as necessary. See enclosed Project Narrative OCT 0 8 200 Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill ADolication 2nnri- city of (:iParwatar 0 • ORiGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Crite Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exeml to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. V" At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): A ova --stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ti" TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; (JLl/GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SI E PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) - SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; tnt OC tT 0 6 ME l Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; • Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Pl.gl q ra o ,u,?`..S % VNivG D 4rc10 . .. . _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; , „ I I Y ? Cl N, , Y F --1------- - -- -^ _ All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access' All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specim en trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0? 10 1 Ni A ?' Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number; presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; = Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and .percentage of the paved vehicular area; 1 Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and ?l _ Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. J a-1/ DUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/ X 11) and. color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; p Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; _ Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _ Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; = Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; 4) Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; _ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); J _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant. schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ?J / REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); t? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); .J COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. .-J OCT 0 6 2005 PLANNING & 0EVci{)Pfv1E11J" . ' 1 ?>ICSI Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater t 0 ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infll Project. /BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) (See, ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). D ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/Z X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. L K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) PLANdviP?G 3 ?3?'=.i. G??i?-?•? 1 ;;, r L Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Cl1Y (71 ` = L,rv c..r?xjal; r_ Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): / wt;rraffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. 1 CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this-aepheaWn. Signatute of property owner or representative Saundra Everh ?4 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OFC1•PfNCS Sworr{?? to and subscribed before me this t day of NUa v 5+ A.D. 2005 Q and/o[ by Mar yet-,lam who s personally known "leas produced 4 - as ary public, commission expires: Expires September 24, 2008 5%` Bonded Troy Fain -insurance. m 600.38544 Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ORiGAAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and Its adjacent development parcels 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tru7e . P operty Owner-400 a C; by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner-Mai street Clearwa ev ent, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Manag Property Owner-Laura Street evelo ent, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of Am9-USt 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke who h ing been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. 1 ®? ? / Notary Public My Commission Expires: \\\?a,PNKNAPMFy?ierfrr ?? o °°?ISSION °° Q> 0 .0 0 0 #DD 205794 <aQ D 9° °?Ory?ndedlhN c?o? °°OQw? , S1TA?AT?E?O S:IPlanning DepartmentOpplication FomtsldevelopmenterliUiitM1+ %x7 ible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc =6200S j , E I }.. ,.:n47 r. TC 14 Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ' PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) Proposed Development Proaram: Existing 9 story office: Movie Theater: Retail: Residential: Projected value: 87,800 sf 55,000 sf 43,500 sf 245 units $200 million plus ' Parkin Table: able: Code Ratio Code Min Spaces Office (*grandfathered) 2/1000* sf 200* ' Movie Theater 4/1000 sf 220 Retail 4/1000 sf 174 Subtotal ("Public' Spaces) 594 Residential (Private) 1.5/unit 368 Totals 962 Development Density Calculations: 1. Non-residential uses/density calculations: Office 87,800 sf _ 4.0 FAR density = Theater 55,000 sf - 4.0 FAR density = Retail 43,500 sf _ 4.0 FAR density = Land required for non-residential uses: 2. Residential density calculations: Total Land within development parcel Less land required for non-residential uses Land available for residential use x 43,560 sf/acre = x 70 units per acre = Proposed residential density Quantity of units needed from Bonus Pool ORIGINAL I? OCT 0 2 3 _t.C??l?tF iV i ti, VcsS k.+2's^J ? ?. -...-- Spaces Provided 200 220 174 594 619 1,213 21,950 sf land needed 13,750 sf land needed 10,888 sf land needed 46,588 sf 176,646 sf 4( 6,588) sf 130,058 sf 2.99 acres land available 209 units allowed by code 245 units 36 units DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) *Existing office parking is grandfathered at approximately 2/1000 (200 Cars). I Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ' PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites ' GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: 0MG1NAL av? OCT Q s 2a? PLANNING, Y Q; 1A rr-- 1. The proposed development positively addresses all of the goals and objectives of the City's Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Core District. The Downtown Core District criteria encourages mixed uses to attract residential and retail activities while continuing to support business uses and this project includes all of the development components desired by the City toward achieving this combination of uses. The proposed development is in harmony with the Downtown Design parameters established for the district as well as surrounding buildings. The Cleveland Street fagade respects the historic "main street" character with traditional architectural elements and materials. All proposed street facades are very pedestrian friendly incorporating extensive on-street retail and restaurant spaces as well as corresponding traffic calming elements where appropriate. The tower design takes its cues from the City's investment in the Public Library, and transitions the old to the new with a more contemporary fagade, but remains in keeping with the established design guidelines by incorporating step-backs as well as traditional base, middle, top features in the architectural fagade. The City has identified this property as a "Superblock" site within its Redevelopment Plan, and has concluded that it is the preferred location for a multi-plex movie theater and entertainment complex combined with public parking uses that support the Coachman Park Master Plan as well as future plans for the Harborview Center property. All of these development components are included in the proposed development plans submitted herein. The proposed development is in harmony with the adjacent properties in many significant ways as described below: The predominant scale and character of the street facade along the historic Cleveland Street corridor has been maintained architecturally and contextually. We have incorporated traditional architectural features and materials such as textured precast concrete, dimensional stone inlays, granite base elements, heavy cornices, storefront retail glass, and awnings and canopies. We have revised the height of the facade directly on Cleveland Street as recommended in the DRC comments by limiting the height to that of the adjacent building to the east, and stepping back from the predominant facade approximately 6' to the theater facade. This has enabled us to incorporate a balcony area on the south side of the theater building. The Osceola Ave. facade (at the Theater/Retail building) respects the scale of both the Harborview Center and the Public Library. In addition, the proposed development integrates a recladded facade on the office building to complete the architectural composition with repeated features, materials, canopies, awnings and window patterns. The parking garage podium is 8 stories tall due to the combined parking requirements for the proposed development plus the public/office/theater/retail parking component (roughly 3.5 stories each). Although this may be beyond the optimum scale in relationship to adjacent properties, it represents an opportunity to displace street parking in favor of potentially expanded parks and recreation areas. Over the course of the last year, many options were studied by both the developer and the City, and it was determined that this design generates the greatest common good for the City. Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ' PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites The pedestrian scale of the proposed development is in keeping with the Downtown Design Guidelines and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. We have revised the Laura Street and N. Ft. Harrison Street facades to incorporate the requisite 75% minimum frontage for principal fagade treatments. All street facades now include similar architectural treatments, new streetscaping, and extensive pedestrian activity zones to enhance the development as a destination. The overall size, character, density and coverage of the proposed development is in keeping with the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the Design Guidelines, the City's Economic Development Goals and Objectives, and similar development projects recently approved by the CRA in the Clearwater Downtown Core. For example, the Water's Edge project, located just half a block away from this development site, is quite similar in many respects, and actually incorporates greater development density than this site on a per acre of land basis. Although this development is taller than any other currently proposed in the Downtown Core, it is the location specifically determined to be most appropriate within the Redevelopment Plan for achieving significant revitalization and rebirth through a targeted mixed use destination type development, plus there are no height limitations, and the proposed development meets virtually every goal major articulated in the Plan document. O`R I G I N A L ' 2. The proposed development will contribute significantly to the revitalization of downtown, and will provide a community atmosphere where residents can live, work, and recreate, all within walking distance of their front door. It also creates an attractive downtown destination ' for visitors and the public with ample parking and a variety of potential activities including enjoying outdoor events at Coachman's Park, convention center activities, library visits, personal training/fitness, restaurants and first run movies. Without question, the proposed ' development will enhance property values regionally and spur additional local development opportunities. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing ' or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Considering the nature of the proposed development, the region will certainly benefit from a more inviting, affluent and secure environment for workers, residents and visitors alike. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Separate entrances and exits are incorporated into the parking garage for the separate user groups. Residential ' condominium owners will enter at the northwest corner of the garage on Osceola Street, and all others will enter at the northeast corner of the garage on Fort Harrison Street. A drop-off feature is incorporated into the entry area of the residential building, and additional traffic ' relief is provided by way of drop-off and pick-up opportunities on Laura Street for restaurant and theater patrons. As exhibited in the above parking table, parking is adequate for all proposed uses, and is further enhanced by allowing the office parking spaces to be accessed ' by the public during non-standard business periods. This results in a total of 595 parking spaces available for public uses during evenings and weekends, providing highly desired relief for the City to reduce the parking demand on surface parking lots surrounding the Library and Harborview Center. The benefits to the City include enhanced opportunities for ' the future redevelopment of these sites, plus long-term revenue opportunities generated by the City owned parking stalls. u/ i r 20DE 0 0 Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA y? p n g 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites Q 1 J "`ad?? 1 1 I L 1 1 5. The proposed development is located within the Downtown Core character district of the downtown redevelopment plan. This Vision established for the district includes high density and mixed use development consisting specifically of the types we are proposing for this site. This is accomplished without sacrificing the objective of maintaining a pedestrian-friendly environment and an architectural style respectful to the historic fabric of Clearwater. The proposed development honors the principal elements of the City's vision for the district while setting a stage for high quality development on surrounding parcels. The proposed development contains a variety of permitted and encouraged uses as described within Downtown Redevelopment Plan. These uses include residential dwellings, retail and restaurant uses, office uses, health club facilities, and first run movie theaters. Although the combination of independent venues will certainly introduce a wide range of operating hours and sensory experiences, all of the uses are considered to be Class A in nature and intended to complement one another, thus avoiding adverse effects to either internal or external users patrons or neighbors The proposed development is located on one of the key redevelopment parcels identified in the City's downtown core redevelopment plan, and considerable effort and care have been taken to comply with or exceed all of the City's objectives for the site. We have accomplished this in the true spirit of a public-private partnership which has resulted in the successful incorporation of the multi-plex movie theater venue, and public parking component within the proposed development. The design of the proposed project minimizes the adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory effect and hours of operation impacts in the following manner: • Potentially adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory effects emanating from the parking garage are mitigated by providing solid concrete walls at adjacent property lines, using visual screening at naturally ventilated opeing, providing specially shielded light fixtures at the garage perimeter and incorporating mechanical ventilation systems to ensure that fumes do not transfer out. • All mechanical equipment is architecturally screened. • Hours of operation impacts are minimized by including complementary uses including office and retail spaces for daytime functions, theater and restaurant spaces for evening and weekend functions and residential for ongoing activity, economic vitality and security within the downtown core. p ?C?C?OUC OCT 0 6 200E PLAN NO'G,w :)c:,`dr?CeNiENi NXS Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infll Project D PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA: ' 1. The redevelopment of the parcel is economically impractical without deviations to the intensity and development standards. Although greater density bonuses were originally contemplated by the City for sites within the downtown core, the proposed development is ' requesting just 36 additional dwelling units to meet the density needs of the project. Greater density bonuses, although desirable in terms of economic feasibility, would have necessitated an increase in building height, and although the district guidelines contain no height limitations per se, certain sensitivities to this subject have been historically prevalent in the City, and this knowledge has detracted from the developer's desire to request density bonuses beyond what is absolutely necessary to make the project viable. In addition to density bonuses, the project is negotiating TIF funding with the CRA to ' compensate for the added parking to be owned and operated by the City. The TIF funding will provide for the design and construction of the City owned spaces as well as reasonable allocations for the cost of land and development soft costs. ' 2. The proposed comprehensive infill project will contribute to the redevelopment goals for downtown with fully developed project values estimated to be in excess of $200 million ' overall. This value represents the direct impact of the project only. It is also anticipated that an indirect effect on surrounding areas will include significant additional capital investment which will further enhance the positive impact of future tax increment to the ' City. 3. The proposed uses for the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are both permitted ' and encouraged by the City of Clearwater. Each proposed use is clearly identified in the redevelopment plan and other documents published by the City of Clearwater and the Economic Development Department. ' 4. The uses within the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses and the downtown redevelopment plan's vision statements. Cleveland Street has been maintained as a primary "Main Street" retail corridor with ' entries to the movie theaters, restaurant locations, and an internal retail "mall". The street fagade on Osceola Street is pedestrian friendly, incorporates street retail frontage, and takes full advantage of the outstanding views to the bay with extraordinary restaurant ' locations incorporating outdoor seating at the western terminus of Laura Street. The residential component will enhance the community aspect of downtown and provide an immediately accessible demographic for the support of the movie theaters and restaurant ' and retail establishments in the area. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the ' comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. This development site offers unique opportunities to satisfy the amount of contiguous space needed for movie theaters and destination-type retail/restaurant spaces. The design of these spaces has been carefully planned to provide for the greatest ' accessibility and value to the public, which will in turn enhance their long-term viability. 6. The proposed development creates a new destination for downtown with attributes not ' presently available to either residents or visitors. The impact of these new development attributes will be both immediate and positive upon commencement of use. OCT 0 6 2005 ORiGINA ? OF''?6',?dAL • s 11D Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for the development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The architectural style was carefully chosen in concert with the City to reflect the more contemporary context provided by the new Public Library and the recently completed bridge to Clearwater Beach. This departure from a more traditional style for the residential tower was a conscious choice intended to differentiate this development from some of the standard fare of architecture in the area. However, the tower design needed to integrate with the more traditional street facades and architectural fabric stipulated in the Downtown Design Guidelines. The proposed development combines these aspects of the architecture extremely well without sacrificing architectural substance. The result is a statement of beauty in the Clearwater skyline that will remain as a timeless masterpiece likely to become the most recognizable icon for the City of Clearwater for years to come. This is a building that the City will embrace both for its appearance, and for its contribution to the revitalization of downtown as a place to live, work and play. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development meets all of the design and community development standards associated with these criteria. As evidenced by the information presented within this Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application, its various attachments, the design documents, and the responses to the specific DRC questions, the proposed development complies with current Redevelopment Plan Guidelines and other pertinent requirements without the need for extensive additional flexibility except as follows. The project is elevated in height due to the public parking component, but the long term benefit to the City justifies this. We have submitted a vacation request to an existing alley. This is due to the fact that the development will cover the alley and render unusable for other purposes. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available in order to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See the Parking Table presented at the beginning of the Project Narrative for evidence of the adequacy of the parking provided. 10. Extensive architectural efforts coupled with numerous project workshops and coordination meetings have resulted in a cooperatively produced design that fully responds to the newly adopted Downtown Design Guidelines. The architectural style and materials remain traditional at the pedestrian level and the Cleveland Street facade is consistent in scale and context in order to maintain the desired street feel. The theater entry respects the centerline and curvature of the newly designed traffic-calming node incorporated into the City's streetscape design (located at the mid-block section of Cleveland Street). This creates a main focal point and enhances the drama and excitement of the theater and retail facade, while bringing a new sense of place to downtown. Other major street facades (Osceola and Fort Harrison Streets) are designed to ensure that the scale, design, and building materials remain consistent with the guidelines; they incorporate street-fronted 10 OCT062005 • • Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites ORiG,1 retail spaces, provide new streetscape and landscape improvements, and focus on pedestrian activities and parking needs. The residential tower incorporates step-backs in the fagade and provides a successful transitioning from its more traditionally styled base to a more contemporary middle and top. The design and positioning of the tower's entry features and ground floor retail and restaurant spaces are in direct consideration of the planned future expansion of Coachman Park. To enhance the overall development and its attractiveness to retail and theater patrons, a public parking component has been incorporated with 560 total spaces available for them, 360 of which are to be owned and operated by the City. OCT 0 6 2005 ; l l IrIOPIV,f N) 7 Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE - Revised 10/6/05 with DRC Responses CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA j 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites SIGNAGE (Division 19. SIGNS/ Section 3-1806) cRtc-Irv;aL 1. No existing freestanding or attached signs are intended to remain in place in the proposed development. 2. A comprehensive sign program will be developed independently and will address wayfinding signage, building signage, tenant signage, monument signage, etc. The applications for the Comprehensive Sign Program will be submitted at a later date due to project size and requirements for detailed design work related to the architectural package. This item was discussed with the Planning Department in advance of the preparation of this application package. OCT0620 8 LL ° Cleaanrw Plning Department Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue > ater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 0 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including i. 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans NOTE: a total of 15 sets of this application and all supporting documentation is required to be submitted in conjunction with a complete Level Two Flexible Development Application. • CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: . RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: OR?GINAL PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 02/14/05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: TH Management LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 400 Cleveland Street. Suite 900. Clearwater. FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727.461.0794 FAX NUMBER: 727.461.0784 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: OC A 0 6 20E PHONE NUMBER: 321.206.4123 FAX NUMBER: 407.628.2105 PLANN011(', = 'Ey,:.z ptl f-411 ,', V( CELL NUMBER: 321.287.5677 E-MAIL ADDRESS: mriekerCa2riekerassociates.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 400 Cleveland Street Plus new development sites as designated on enclosed property survey LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See enclosed survey (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See enclosed survey PARCEL SIZE: 4.06 acres. 176.646 sf (acres, square feet) HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? 36 HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? n/a IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES X NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) 11 D Page 1 of 2 1 a W n6 PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENITY TO BE PROVIDED (attach photographs, drawings, etc, as applicable): Extensive Public Amenities are included within the proposed development as follows:_ 245 Residential Dwellin Units 10 Screen Movie Theater (first run movies) Streetscape improvements' on Osceola Street Fort Harrison Street and Laura Street (see enclosed plans for locations) Wavfinding Plans in keeping with current downtown Clearwater standards (styles may vary slightly) 42.500 sf of downtown retail space including contiguous areas designed to support destination retail/restaurants ' note: all streetscape improvements are consistent in appearance and materials with City streetscape plan C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property describ In t Is lication. Signature of property ewneFor representative (see enclosed "Affidavit to Authorize Agent") STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Sworn to and subscribed before me this 24Lday of August , A.D. 20 05 to me and/or by Mark Rieker A who is personally known has plFeduc ?' ,? I aS Notary public, QUO My commission expires: .?'?'??••. Saundra Everhart D 1?1 L '_ ?:: Commission # DD353934 I k 11 Expires September 24, 2008 OCT 0 ZOOd J i 9onded Tmy Fain • Insurance. Inc NO.385-7019 N 'l ;,UC5! S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application.doc Page 2 of 2 1 1 i ? ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and its adjacent development parcels 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is Burke, Manager Property Owner- ainstreet C velopment, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Manag Property Owner-Laura Street evelopme y Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this o A J U `'- day of August 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. \/ J `????o???(NAPMF),?r?//i Notary Public My Commission Expires: ?Q : MIgSIONF ; 9 • p zo ; #DD 205794 0 0¢ pj ` public Wde?:• 4vo' S:nanning DepartmentOpplication Formsldevelopment reviewl8exibie development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc E D OCT0620E PLANNING ? DEVELOPMENT SVCS GI-ly (lf Cl,Ett `VAT . 0 * ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER Public Works Administration - Engineering Department FORM NUMBER 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Room 220 1311-0104 P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 Ph.: 727 562-4750 Fax: 727 562-4755 1 11 VACATION REQUEST FILING FORM Note: Responses to Items I - 9 are required. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone:. YU ` ,) 8C. =;? HEREBY PETITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE VACATION OF THE FOLLOWING: ? EASEMENT TYPE: ? STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ALLEY ? OTHER: 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED: ?e- e GcftccdtPl? "i+?lt? of S??f6G7 2sc61FI('0Y?, 3. STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION: q00 0&'oelco"?i p L? G L? U U ?? FOCT(0 6200. J' PLANNING 8, C£:Vr:.iOPME N i C VCS 4. PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY: 411jCe 5. ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY: North: D South: ) East: D West: ?R? Printed on recycled paper Page 1 Revised 6/24/2005 6. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS: a. Proof of Property Ownership b. Land Survey of Property c. Site Plan showing Proposed Use of Vacated Property (Type of identification) d. Filing Fee per Ordinance No. 5969-96: ($500.00 for a Right-of-Way/alley or $400.00 for an Easement) 7. THE FOLLOWING FOUR LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION ARE REQUIRED: a. Progress Energy b. Verizon Florida, Inc. Jill %?ovcsl oRIcIiv,li c. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. d. Bright House 8. NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER (PLEASE PRINT) EJJ64-05>cD AFF1 DAVI r TD AVt*4MW ? Same as Applicant A 6e&r' Name: _mmylm W- R15I?EI? Phone: 521.2 0 '-123_ Address: E 3 27(255 9. EffNE- SIGNATU Date: A- Z& . Os NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of t c ?? JW5 , by 64, av- Rt Q k,-0 ; - , who is personally known to me~ j or has produced My Commission expires: bY?" Saundra Everhart : Commission # DD353934 Expires September 24, 2008 Bondad riot' Fain, Ineumnee. Mc 800.385.7019 D? PLAIN as Name of notary typed, printed or stamped: OCT06ME A Printed on recycled paper Page 2 Revised 6/24/2005 0 0 0MG1 AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and its adjacent development parcels 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (I/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true LLC; by Kevin Burke, Manager r•roperry u mer ainstreet c Development, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Man Property Owner-Laura S t Develo ent, LLC•••by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, `' Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this c? A -3 ? CU ? day of August , 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke who having been first duly swom Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the conteG of the affidavit that he/she signed. `\??001111111101//J/?d U Notary Public J My Commission Expires: ?axY NAPN ire * a N o z ' #DD 205794 o Q S o?;A 0/ 0, 017 th" oj9??p•,;pub lceUn e ; . ?BCIC, STAS? S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment revt1143 iih1WICelopment comprehensive infi/l application 2005.doc OCT 0 6 200- PLANNING ? Ot:VJ :10-MEN :. VCS :VY OF I Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater SECTION 16 - TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH -. RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA LAURA STREET (P+F) P.O.C. KW.. Comw Lot 7 I I I I I r. ? I 00 - 3 I .? o I I ? I I W .O8 88 828'1 ' E Va. 0 /00 ' ' W N 8824 R9 W i 10021' I 0 I I I I (V r I +, I J -? I I I I 10' Alley Vacation FOR: Rieker and Associates i { I I I i I i I I i I I J I I ? I { I I I? I? I 1T i I I i I I i I EA, L AND TAT'.E'S SUBDIVISION (Pi.at Book H -'l, Page 20) I I { I I i M I I I +, i I 1 0 1 i I J ? I I I I ? I i { I i I I I { LEVELAND STREET C 111 O8TSLW LAKES SJWBOULM4 WC. OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 v BOUNDARY-TOPOGRAPHIC-CONSTRUCTIONSTAEOUf PH: (813) 854-1342 FAX (813) 855-6890 OCT06`005 s DWG. NG.: SU54U NV. UAir UCJWtIrIRA11 SKETCH and DE SURVEYORS CERTFrA7E NOTASU hereby certify this SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION to be the raphic depiction made by me, or under my direct 'ROJECT NO. W upervision, on the date(s) shown, which meets the IRAWING# 5 ch INIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS set forth by the FLORIDA KALE OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS and MAPPERS OARD iRAWN , n C 6pter 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, iATE ant to S" 0eu n 1472.02^ ?ORIDA STATUTES. %(SEAW KELLY Ol McdLUNG ( DATE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR and MAPPERI*40 NOT TO SCALE R G N L 1 i 1 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 DESCRIPTION= ti J? A portion of the 10 foot alley lying between Lots 1 & 2 and Lots 7 & 8,' of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence S00'14'53"W, along the east right-of-way line of Osceola Street, a distance of 123.67 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S 88°29'10" E, along the southerly line of said lots 7 and 8, a distance of 100.17 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 8; thence S 00°06'07" W, a distance of 10.17 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence N 88'24'13" W, along the northerly line of said Lots 1 and 2, a distance of 100.21 feet; thence N 00'1734" E, along the east right-of-way of Osceola Street, a distance of 10.03 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel contains 1012 square feet, more or less. LEGEND NO SCALE FND FOUND R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY SCIR SET 1/2' CAPPED IRON ROD 'LB 4513' & CENTERUNE FIR FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) HIGHWAY FCIR FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) BLVD BOULEVARD FRR FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE NO. NUMBER PK PARKER KAYLON NAIL P013 POINT OF BEGINNING FCM FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SIZE NOTED) POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT FOP FOUND OPEN-ENDED IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) D DESCRIPTION FPP FOUND PINCHED-TOP IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) F FIELD MEASURED FN&D FOUND NAIL do BRASS DISK ' O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS (BOOK) SN&D SET NAIL IN BRASS DISC 'LB 4513 PG PAGE PLS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PB PLAT BOOK LB LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS P PLAT P?IVIi?I ? ?; '! ` r i +,7r x,45 N l `v elL NOTLS- 1. THIS IS A SKETCH AND. DESCRIPTION. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. 2. BASIS OF BEARING: THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA STREET BEING SO0°14'53"W, ASSUMED. 3. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR MATTERS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. 4. THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND 5. REFERENCE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR DESCRIPTION. ORIGINAL ADDRESSES OF UTILITY COMPANIES NOTE: Ask the utility companies listed below to provide you with a letter of "NO OBJECTION" for your proposed vacation request. Provide each a survey of your property showing the area of the street right-of-way, alley or easement proposed to be vacated. Be sure to submit the original signed version of the no objection letters with your vacation application. Progress Energy 2166 Palmetto Street Info: (727) 562-5751 Building "F" Fax: (727) 562-5.686 Clearwater FL 33765 Contact; Person Phone O eration Area Jeanne Talhouk (727) 562-3903 . Sunset Point Rd. north to Curlew Rd. west of U.S. 19 . Gulf to Bay Blvd. north to Sunset Point Rd. between Belcher Rd. and Highland Ave. . All of Clearwater Beach Rene' Martin (727) 562-5662 . S.R. 580 north to Curlew Rd. east of U.S. 19 . Sunset Point Rd. north to S.R. 580 east of Belcher Rd. . Belleair Road north to Sunset Point Rd. east of U.S. 19 Craig Kopkau (727) 562-5660 . Belleair Rd. north to Gulf to Bay Blvd. from U.S. 19 to Hi hland Ave. Verizon Florida, Inc. MC: FLCW5033 Info: (727) 562-1193 1280 E. Cleveland Street Fax: (727) 562-9614 Clearwater FL 33755 Contact Person Phone' - O eration Area. Vickie Singleton 727 562-1126 . Ci ide Knology Broadband of FLSP 2144 Fax: (727) 217-2649 3001 Gandy Blvd. N. Florida. Inc. Pinallckc Parlr FT. 'ATM. Contact Person Phone O eration Area ' Jay Young (727) 239-0156 Office . Citywide 727 235-1553 Cell Bright House 700 Carillon Parkway Ct- PPtPrchura_ FT,_ 33716 Fax: (727) 329-2845 Contact.Person ..Phone O eration Area; Scott Creasy 727 329-2817 . North of Belleair Rd. Sherelle Darroch 727 803-5061 . South of Belleair Rd. p l i J I OCT 0 6 200E {? 1 rLANNIN(i V. ,!r t tiw7.,r OR?i Printed on recycled paper Page 3 'I iY F tF. to •;a' 12/2005 Horthsitie August 23, 2005 Mr. Barry Ritz Progress Energy 2166 Palmetto Street, Building "F" Clearwater, FL 33765 Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Ritz: CIVIL i LAND PLAI04ING A ENVIRONMENTAL i TRANSPORTATION ORIGINAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your ate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. 7Sre1 y , __. p CCU 0 V Housh Ghovaee, CEO OCT0620F- 601 CLE`?E`CX-ND MEMM5ITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MIND5PRiN6.C0M NE5TECh@MINDSPRIN6.COMM 727 - 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 - 8036 (??:,??EN' vJGS CIVIL LAND PLAN P-l1` (S O ENVIRONMENTAL. i TRANSPORTATION August 23, 2005 Mr. Jay Young Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. 3001 Gandy Boulevard North Pinellas Park, FL 33782. Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Young: ORIG!NA L Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your imm OuLte attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. Y, Housh Ghovaee, CEO 609 CLEVIRR'ND STIZE !MIJITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N E5AD/,hI NC/?,11 N DS PRI NG.COM NESTECH@,^AINDSPRiNG.COM '7l'7 . AAA . l0/0 CAV 777 . AA-A . AC)IA OCT062001 PLANNING OF CI A.QP TN SVGS CIVIL i LAND PLANNING ENVIRONPAENI-AL TRANSPORTATION 10 August 23, 2005 Mr. Scott Creasy Bright House 700 Carillon Parkway St. Petersburg, FL 33716 Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Creasy: ORIGINAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your immediate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. /bus7hGhovaee, ly, CEO 609 CLEV65 ND 5'T7tEE6151TE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NE5ADMIN@MIND5PRIN6.CON NESTECH@MINDSPRI?dG.COM D c r3 OCT062001E PLANNING 4 ?? : r' +OPMEWl• W`iCS 10.ribsive August 23, 2005 Ms. Vickie Singleton Verizon Florida, Inc. 1280 E. Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 33755. Re: Vacation Request Correction Ms. Singleton: 0 CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVI RON/V\ENTAL TRANSPORTA7-ION. ORIGNAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your immediate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. Ghovaee, CEO 601 CLEVER?-ND TTRWAITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADPAiN@A/?INDSPRING.CO,°A NESTECH@MiND5PRIN6.CO1v\ 111. A A5 . '%o<o cnv -7» . AAA . A(') lA p LC1?DW OCT06200 PLANNING ? DE :'r: t(`+'MEN 1';,VvS E'. Progress Energy r SEA 1 9 2005 9/15/05 Housh Ghovaee u:-._...:...,.:_.., Northside Engineering 601 Cleveland St. ' ?GH' 'A Clearwater, FL 33755 ' Re: Easement Vacate Request, Earl and Tate's Subdivision, Osceola St/Laura St. Dear Mr. Ghovaee: Thank you for advising us of subject proposed project. ' Progress Energy has no objections. Progress Energy has no objection provided an easement is granted or ' retained along the northern edge of said ROW for existing and future facilities. ' _X_ Progress Energy has no objections provided applicant bears the expense for relocation of any Progress Energy facilities to to maintain service to customers affected by the proposed vacation. In order to properly evaluate this request, Progress Energy will need detailed plans of facilities proposed for subject area. X_ Progress Energy has facilities within this area which may Of conflict with subject project. Please refer any further correspondence and pre-construction meeting notifications to ' me at the below address or you can contact me by phone at (727) 588-7439. Sincerely, ' PROGRESS ENERGY cl_-_-,:, "' - Barry Ritz ' Clearwater Operations ; FOCT 0 6 206E II? lI?? AteG ? of. v"; i 1PM1VN ? S'VGSI ' Walsingham Engineering • 12600 Walsingham Rd.* Largo • Florida 33774 • (727)588-7431 A Florida Progress Company • KNOLoGY0 Telephone Cable TV Internet September 15, 2005 Housh Ghovaee, CEO Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 601 Cleveland St., Suite 930 Clearwater, Fl 33755 RE: Vacation Request Dear Mr. Ghovaee: • ORIGINAL Thank you for advising us of the subject proposed plat / vacation of easement/R.O.W. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. has no objection. _X_ In order to properly evaluate this request, Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. will need detailed plans of facilities proposed for the subject area. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. has facilities within this area which may conflict with the subject project. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. has no objections provided easements for our facilities are granted or retained as shown on the attached drawing or applicant bears the expense for relocation of any Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. facilities to maintain service to customers affected by the proposed vacation. Please refer any further correspondence and-pre-construction meeting notices to: Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. k Bill King Construction Supervisor 3001 Gandy Blvd. N. Pinellas Park, FI_ 33782 Notes: Active subscriber at 400 Cleveland St, suite 4 requires continuous service. Sincer . y, /Steve R Fitzpa ric Field Engineer Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. 727-239-0155 Office 727-217-2649 Fax KBF FORM 'B' 12/31/03 1?1t'v4l0 S1 3001 Gandy Boulevard North • Pinellas Park, FL 33782 • www.knology.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 09/06/2005 15:53 7274466 0812 105 07:39 FAX 654 21 NORTHSIDE ENG SVO Tampa.-Soutlx- I P8 Verixon Florida Inc, 1280 Cleveland St FLGW 5033 (72T) 582.1102 ?'7ZT) 365-8653 mcme FAMi"O. (727) 982-9613 I?r ry_r1 _,??nsonc5wes?aa? .com August S, 2005 Via Facsimile Mr. Housh Ghovase, CEO 601 Cleveland Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, FL 33755 PAGE 02/02 401 0 R iGifvP1L RE, Vacation of Public Right of Way Ten (10) foot allay. south of Laura Street & north Cleveland St.; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & a of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION: Plat Book H-1. Page 20 P'i0alias County, Fiodcla Dear Mr. Ghavaes VERIZON Florida, Inc. will require easements as indicated an the attached plat. VERITAN Florida, Inc requires no additional easements. NERIZON Florida, Inc. does object to the above referenced right of way vacation. This is r1sc asaaw. as we have buried cables in the existing rights of way. which needs to be maintained, VERIZON Florida, Inc. has no objectlan to the above referenced vacate. XXXX VER=N Florida, Im has no objection to the above referenced vacate providing an easement is maintained for the existing fariGdes presently located within the above referenced Public tight-af way or providing we are raimbursed for the reiocatfon of our fadr'ities to a new location. Please call me if you have any questions or need any additional information at (727) 562,1102. Sincerely, oe naw.lohnnon C? -? Cl ?v1 L Specialist Network Engineering Support FOCT 0 6 2!99 A part of Vertzon Corporation PLANNING V -+.Sr UIN r Chuck Butler 701175 1h St. N. Pinellas Park, Fl., 33781 Ph.# (727) 544-0445 Fax # (727) 541-5027 E-mail: butlersnursery(wmsn.com chuckbutler(cb.tampabay.rr.com ORGNAL OCT 0 0 200. PLANNIN(; 'r1 C;an? 'C Tree Inventory 4-- cal i Y f )F -c`q Aqua As required by the City of Clearwater, I have completed an assessment of all trees (8" dbh or greater) on the subject site and within 25' beyond the property lines. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability (rating of 1-5) and any potential hazards of these trees. # size/tvne rating/comments 1 15" Live Oak 3, over-pruning, mechanical damage, dead-wood in interior 2 14" Live Oak 4 3 19" Live Oak 4, Co-dominate 4 19" Live Oak 3, Co-dominate, dead branches in interior 5 13" Live Oak 3 6 40" Live Oak 5, Co-dominate 7 20" Live Oak 4, Compacted roots 8 20" Sabal Palm 4 9 13" Sabal Palm 3 10 24" Sabal Palm 3 11 12" Washin tonia palm 3 12 17" Sabal Palm 3 13 18" Eugenia 3 14 12" Ficus 4 15 28" Live Oak 3, In wires, interior dead wood, Co-dominate 16 18" Live Oak 3, Included bark, interior dead-wood 17 24" Sabal Palm 4 18 12" Sabal Palm 3 19 8" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 20 18" Sabal Palm 3 r- 'i 0 o RIGINAL 21 14" Live Oak 2, Growing in fence 22 11" Sabal Palm 3 23 15" Sabal Palm 3 24 12" Sabal Palm 3 25 9" Sabal Palm 3 26 18" Sabal Palm 4 27 10,15 Laurel Oak 4, Co-dominate 28 8" Queen Palm 2, Almost dead 29 23" Sabal Palm 3 30 18" Live Oak 4, Included bark, some dead-wood 31 18" Orchid 3, Interior decay 32 8" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 33 9" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 34 8" Black Pine 3, Machanical damage 35 15" Live Oak 4, Minor dead-wood I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Sincerely, Chuck Butler, Certified Arborist, Certificate #FL-1235A OCT 0 6 2MM IGkC?°10i,M a-tcVCS Horthsige E"&"s la. i CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • STORMWATER REPORT FOR : C. W. ACQUA DOWNTOWN PROJECT 0 G r ` Ce?A L a ? . s • ?Y e ?- . fS3 M Ram A. Gap$ a s p??ttrata` October, 2005 Project No. 0543 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N DS PRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 D [I 1k 5 6 2005 fi ?? C's • 1 of 1 CW Acqua (aD- Downtown Plaza DRAINAGE NARRATIVE This site consists of an area of 176,646 s.f. We are proposing to remove existing impervious area of 162,500 s.f. including asphalt parking, office, bank, retail building and replace it with 245 attached residential dwellings, retail, theater, offices with parking garage. A covered underground retention vault is proposed to accommodate the required Y2 inch water quality and discharge the over flow into the City of Clearwater Stormwater system through a 36 inch RCP to a new 54-inch RCP to be provided by the City. Drainage Calculations Water Quality Volume Required: 176,646 X 1/2X 1/12 = 7,360 c.f. Retention Vault provided= 20' x 140' x 4.5' deep .1 0 RAC"or.? Total Volume Provided = 12, 600 c.f. Justification for a Vault Vs Pond Site is nearly 100% impervious because of parking garage and building and hence there is no room for an open pervious pond. Z:12005AutoCAD Projects10543 - (C.W. Acqua Downtown Plaza)letters & AppsICWAcqua DRAINAGE NARRATIVE r 092905.docl of 1 PROJECT NAME : C.W. ACQUA DOWNTOWN PROJECT NO.: 0543 VAULT STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.V. EL.= W.Q. EL. BOTTOM EL.= 0 R "I N ? L STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 31.25 2,800 0.064 12,600 30.25 2,800 0.064 9,800 29.50 2,800 0.064 7,700 29.00 2,800 0.064 6,300 28.50 2,800 0.064 4,900 28.50 2,800 0.064 4,900 28.00 2,800 0.064 3,500 27.50 2,800 0.064 2,100 26.75 2,800 0.064 0 VAULT No. 1 WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME _ PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = OCT 0 6 200e 4UV?7 176,646 SF 0.50 IN 7,360 CF 30.25 FT ?= A A00 CF • 0 NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: C.W. ACQUA DOWNTOWN PROJECT NO.: 0543 VOLUME PROVIDED = 9,800 C.F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 30.25 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 26.75 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 26.00 K = 0.09 FT/MIN LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 80 FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH POND AREA (SF) = POND AREA (SF) = R C `? N A L 2,800 S.F. 2,800 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HG FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 30.25 2,800 3.56 0.88 2.75 1.30 126 14.64 2,450 167 29.38 2,800 2.69 0.88 2.75 0.98 126 11.05 2,450 222 28.50 2,800, 1.81 0.88 2.75 0.66 126 7.45 2,450 329 27.63 2,800 0.94 0.88 2.75 0.34 126 3.85 2,450 636 26.75 2,800 TIME = 1,354 MINUTES TIME = 22.6 HOURS Lt1F)LUw L? OCT 0 6 200 PLANNING & 0EVELC2€ M1 Ni ;; vU October 5, 2005 Mr. Mark Rieker 1020 N. Orlando Ave., # 150 Maitland, Florida 32751 Reference: CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza T% Subject: Maintenance and Operation of the Detention Vault Dear Mr. Rieker: Per the rules and regulations of the Southwest Florida Water Management District, we are required to furnish you with a set of instructions for maintenance and operation of the detention vault. The detention vault is designed to maintain certain volumes of rainfall runoff corresponding to specific water elevations. The control structure regulates the level of the water in the vault. The volume above the slot should be discharged under a grease skimmer and through the slot within a few hours following a storm event. The volume below the slot should take less than 24 hours to be discharged through underdrain infiltration. The water level in the vault should drop approximately 1' below the slot and the vault should be dry within 24 hours following a storm event, assuming there is no interceding rainfall. Here are some suggested procedures to keep the system functional: The bottom of the vault should be inspected regularly to assure that excess siltation has not occurred. Siltation of the vault shall be controlled to assure that the storage volume is not affected. Periodic cleaning of the vault bottom and removal of silts is required. It is required that cleaning be done every six (6) months. 0 0 Grass clippings and other debris should be removed from the parking area to assure they are not transported to the retention vault. The control structure should be checked monthly and after severe rainfall events and all debris cleared. Your Management of Surface Water Permit should contain a number of conditions which must be met. If you have any questions or concerns about this project please do not hesitate to call our office. Sipperely, y`+°° orthside Engineering Services, Inc ' m §oe P& D., P.E.# 47431 •01 S-dnior Eh6i?6er s ,,Neathside Engineering Services, Inc 64 &6land Street, Suite 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 0 6 200:. ?1 ? O CT i w J,5; ER, _,.. RECEIVED AUG 24 7(05 r C NY pF FINWWAM FLD2005-08084 400 CLEVELAND ST _ QRIGINQL Date Received: 08/24/2005 ACOUA AT THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA ZONING DISTRICT: D LAND USE: CBD ATLAS PAGE: 286B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet Sep 05 2005 3:25PM RIEN Z & nSSOCInTES 407W'35509 p.2 Commare 4 & mr*tvioml Dev*LTa W: A1ana ernenl c?r fm services Pro* management September 5, 2005 Mr. Robert Teflt planner III CPPY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33758 Re. FLD2005-08M _ 400 Cleveland Sheet (CW Acqua) Response to latter of hwompleteness dated August 30,200:5 Dear Robert, This letter is in response to your above neferenoed eorrespondeme, wherein it is noted that in order to complete ow Flexible DeveWpmmt Comprehensive Infill Applirc~ation, all street addresses and parcel numbers for all of the parcels involved in the development proposal need to be provided. Enclosed please find comprehensive parcel data and records for your information and use. In summary, the parcels are identified as follows: 1. 400 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-1540000-120-0300. 2. 400 Cleveland Std ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0010. 3. 400 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0070. 4. 400 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0190. 5. 410 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29L-15-23914-000-00-:,O. 6. 418 Cleveland Street, DNo.16-29-15-23814-000-0040. 7. 420 Cleveland Street, ID No.16-29-15-23814-000-WSO. 8. Alleyway-no address, ID No. 16-29-15-23914-000-0100, 9. 416 Laura Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0180. Should you have any questions regarding this infornration, please do not hesitate to contacx me. Sincerely, RER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Rieker President Encl. Cc: Kevin Burke, Wiseman & Burke Andrea Zeman, Fowler White Gornmerdai Deve1opmenVCanshdi0n1Project Management Services 1020 N. O7 ando Ave., Suit 150, tuts Mnd, FL 32751 ph: 321206.3399 tax: 407.628.2105 Sep 05 2005 3:25PM RIEI W- & ASSOCIATES Commercial & Ins?it cnal Development -Management Cunstn on services Project Managemmeni 40765509 1020 N. Orlando Ave, Suite 150 Maitland, FL 32751 Ph: 321,2D6.3399 Fax 407.628.2105 FACSIMILE Date: Monday, September 05, 2005 Project: CW Acqua To: Robert Te$t Subject: FLD200"8084 Firm: City of Clearwater From: Mark Rieker Fax: 727.562.4865 Phone: 321.206.4123 Number of Pages ? Urgent ? Please Review/Respond (including cover sheet): 36 Co??tvTS: Please see enclosed information for the above project. p.1 This message is intended solely far the individael or Wtity to which it m addre=4 and may cm twin information that is privileg4 con6deotial and exempt fram disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notfied that any dissemination, distn'bu<ion or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and kindly return the original message to us at the address shown via U.S. Postal Service. 't'hank you. Sep 05 2005 3:25PM RI R a ASSOCIATES 40705509 p.3 Pinellag Records Clerk of the Circuit Court Official Records Results Form Page I of I KEN BU RKE 0 cue OF Tm CtVW CON" PWIOMs CaM IS Pd lri Official Records Results Doema t hug" now viWW le kom Jsnuvy 1. 1987. ords Ptequested Crit@ria Fran O mpe nst Inst mim WGFA-n CLEVELAND P Records In Systwn: uAug ocessed: Date:1/3M 967 RNsnW Dates &W2= : aft i12001 13: 27:10 EDT 2003 Displayed below. Page 1 wHh 4 Records: 1 ttiru 4 of 4 400 CLEVELAND LLC to 400 CLEVELAND LLC tin Party o!F Otter Patty Inst Description File Date Book Pa nstr # T 1 ETC EARL CLEVELAND IW* WESTMINSTER TATES SUB 11/'2003 12591 1667 2003096543 C CAPITAL CO L C ETC ?E LANa DECADE GULFCOAST LT 1 ETC EARL T 111200;1 12591 1487 2003098529 FFICE PA RTNE ES SUB ETC F FIXTURES ETC LAND k2pb INSTER CAPITAL CO L C EIN LT 1 ETC EARL ST S TATES SUB 311112A03 12591 1689 00 ETC [ 00 IhtSTER LT 1 ETC EARL EVELAND F APriAL CO L C TA TES SUB 3' ,,, 3111/2003 12591 1553 96636 E r _ _ _,C http:llpubtitlet.co.phwllas.B.us/ofllcWreclofficiahwMNDARegnlts2 jsp?documentQurxy... 8/1112085 Sep 05 2005 3:25PM RI R & nssociRTES - Tim G. Hairs 45M Tantta mi Trail brth suits 300 Naples. F1. 34103 This hat wAW was Pm":ed By: Irtaty Tieeae Felt Eat;. t & Hrady LLP 411 Bast WUCGIWU MOM sufte 2900 Mitwa&W, Wl 5M - aanyyd?? Afift%MrdftVOMIff.TP O.Y. A=NtM IIL Esqr 3ahoson, . FbM l t? Bums. P_ L 911 GUMM Stltxt P. O. Hole 1368 CWwwater, PL 33757-i 368 Sl?ewiaoot;dio8 /"?557.400.00 doc skamps ? ? PUT" Appwiw [dendAMMom Na X16-24.15.00000-120-0Lf00 #16-24-15 =14-000-0010 #16.29-15-23814-000.00'10 -7 1&2¢i5-23814-000-0 PAGES A=T . .. 0 atc of IA .LYE DS INT Ibis spedal FEES MTF- DECADE GUI1rCC PICpartnership, as to an REV ,-•-- 30% interest, havial 3188 ("Grantor") :K SAL addross of 406 Scid G AWr valuable grants, b cutain a GIMI e'a Tax ?., Idts?it`bcation 140. WARRANTY DEKD ' v PeK m?e the-4 of 1 s.r ?? . 2003 by ,?ARTNffiiS LI Arm PAR'1 NV SIiIP', a Florida. limited tofN19 interest and JBFFM KEMR1:.as to an un divided W24130 Rivearwrood Wv% Suite 100, Waukesha, WI LL'VBLAND. LLC, a Florida limited.iialsility company. having an Boulevard, Clle ndale, CA 91204 ("grantee"). Jraritor, for end in comsidnation of the sum of $10.00 and other rtecWand wiffloiencywhereofIs-hm-oby wknowledged,hterteby ts, remises, releases, conveys and eonSrnis unto Grw%tM ell that in Pinellas County, Florida, mares particularlj? desotibe:d in Exhibft A crated herein by rerference (the " Ptvperty" )„ subject. however, to those B attached hereto. Mtrve and to Hold, the Property, subject to the aforesaid ancurnbrances and other r!kW"tp Grantee in fee simple forever. )Arad Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the PropeW, subject to the aftwaid ancunibm ms and other matters, in fee simp*- that O rentor has good right and lawf a audwity to sell and convey said lead, Bred bereby warrants the title to said land and will defend flee same against. the law fat O*ns of all persons cbdmktg by, through or muter said Grardor, but against none other. 407*5509 p.4 MM F. IE RM lM (IF PMA CllRWO R M 2MM 03-113! 109 YOB 61 i AM Q.ESIEIAII ! ?? M14M 0911493 i:1 Bf MOM i w p ? ?y}? RMAM 0Q? P11?E8 1 0.00 iw A. . OM - I.99 3 OP40.00 I ` TOMS OAMA f ? ??' F1 111Ti/?7 ILI.IW '` .1 • `,.M•r M*`-?l?8?$?3p48?M?MAR--1 1-w?2003 D 9O:5 f 11CV1..f1V YM SK 12M 1 P1401 QBIUIICBM34"6Q.r i Sep 05 2005 3:25PM RIE R & ASSOCIATES 4075509 p.5 in Wham Wbwee& Grantor has caused these preaenls to be executed in its name, by its pM= or& mra themunto duly mthorW4 the day and yew firm Ah-ova writtem I ? S%pe4 smaW w d dehtwed P IN6LLti$ COUNTY FLA. In WF , MC• EK I L4991 PR 1X488 the p?aenoa ? M ANTOR: r v DECADE BAST OFFICE PARTNERS LAMED p , as to an undivided WZ9 ixticrost . •" N • 4-.e? By: J9 of clearwater, Inc., Clmad as ? VUftm Print Name: •? ${ j - - sib, er, President print NerQe: A. Stgpshxra ? `' ?' • Priest Name: ?-? •3 PSI .? t ; deffiey , as td an undivided 10% interest ' Print lvame._.___--•r???? STATE OF COUNTY OF 3 lot was acimewledsed before me this ? day of 1 w&h= 2003 The fcAp `*=y i by re}$uy and as the President of X I nvosknents of Clearwater, Inc., the it ?l do GuT boast OMm Parbiers Limited Partnersb ip, on behalf of said limited p!#W",. Is persmmfiy ltnowrn to me. M ? tzt5?. ? plint ??°: '41L? ~ .ti p NOTARY PURUC .. Q.: , my Co¢nadseion - _ 1 ' 0 3 "' •?l? w-?'' ,.rte?,?1?,?! _ .__ - i QBNlKEr5y49S66.t _ - Sep 05 2005 3:26PM RIE R & ASSOCIATES 40735509 p.6 E7CHl:BIT A Legal Desedotiou A INELL AS COUNTY FLA. OF'r", REC . BK 12M I Pe 149S Lots 1, 2, 7, 8, anal 9, and the West 10 Sect of W 18. and al} of-let-9, ?A, and 21, of Berl and TWvs MdMsion, a subdivision a<xardin$ to the R, c?thai'bof revordod in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public Records of Pineltss 0ounty, Flo ,x LESS right-of--way for alley. \ AND Bq& at the Northwest comer of Lot 21 of Bart a:4 Tilef Won, a subdivision wcording to the Record Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book ?1, ps?e 0 in the Public Rmords of Pinellas Gou=ty, Florida, and am Northerly along the Nd* of the West line of said Lot 21 a dfiftmm of 233.16 feet to an iron pipe fia=t , 23331 feat South of the North line of Section 16, Tovanhip 29 South, Range 15 an County, Flonda; thence Easterly 347.15 fat to an "X" cut in concrete on the WhabpF13? dght-of- V lire of North Fort EWrrism Avw mae; Omm Sondmly along the said West right-of-way line of North Fort Hamson Avame a &Am* of 2M.00 feet to an iron pia; c e Westady 173,83 feet to an iron pin; thence Southedy 33.80 fact to aoouor s zr L tine Wedwly 13.47 feet to a'te' in cm=vte; thence Westerly to the Point of Be?id???, ;? n, Y b P'ai /r i « i +M r i•?T\ ?S Sep 05 2005 3: 26PM R I R L E?SSOC I RTES 4075509 p.7 FEB 20 200 19113 FR O"LES - DY L1.P 941 434 4998 TO SW497pl%b R P.WWW Also described ss. PtNR1.l.Pe CITY MR, ? - OFF . RKC . SK i an I Pal 1460 - oMarlcLr ? . 04res1 of lood.ialas a 0eett.r of Gaston it. T..ytW 94 dbetl.o ftesso 14 Coot. 101e.11as 4409111. Rlarldl, 60421 movie psrfiavlar/r iaaorirod 0. t•'l' Mtis o1 the Owdltiorl a?o1r of I.mt 4. 4 * VOWIVlitpl " tee.rp[ M Fist Iwo N•14 rpyysv So of Ills Fouts WNW" of Ftarl M. f'fa'rids. saw tattle tun law at [4lssao4111se a1 Ion haft Riot-st-m Ils=4w-=§ roof N! toot 11"46 night-sr itw at Alevela0d AsaNif aoeardl4f) to soil 41?11i olm* good Palo* below IOM,4T'S. saw U1441 foot from the A- wm a of Nut VOW AIO TAIMIS >t11MIVts14C fbalq she 61140 N bawsils for tta4 {/deal: lbooft OWf4t3ft. oteaw tie li"t nuts of 0414 Lot I. LAIrV• !a ltl?t01sia1i. sa11 befog sold 401 ttlwbt-of-" 11M of OoMN¦ 111ra1. t11K 1 I oM4 f to its fool{fMwal ssrMr of too! a0reass tu?q*rh dsaor4tst [4 Off Islas Revd 41-4, A r I"* MAS fhb 10et11a Mevrrs of plastics Cess1Y. Ftarodat timmm OWN & a1 IM tiett Faso of toad arfely ppreo4ppoasser doewo N 10 0914,6444 Meow IN r' page Moir fir 1119Ai1 toot f• IM partlwast saver of low oertals for pr° [tea is aytt14iv1 Msrrd? faei, . Ps" si46¦ Cow W" a porat as tie fast ?I ittUi, soli 9000. IWI TABS 4=tVlai0ti f10as it lot t. IIAAta. An TAw' s also oyes cn. tar fis.See t1Zo 04?. alarm 4614 & 944.79 fiat to the lsstiessf "versa sfZ aot4. Lot a. parts 69104 is 06101 om 11814 forit Rlslaf• 1-'ltitr 1140 elf Glen ltN ANavrN; Illldtdd'ef OMIs7" tr. o1gsP the South 1100 Of 0414 LO L ell" A WTATW1 Ai1fYlMif*1, sad tM ttwtt Lire of Said $At 1. EAIKL Ate t11,1t'4 4dA V4111016 woopmstivolr. atltla lp pie flsem 11I14-al-way live of Clswi4ad Attest. far too. 12 toot 10 too f011fC ? lrtiAlm? fit 11e141A IL1i ON UW IF mtlRMI •v' 19rrar of stso0rs; CON trot I I • 110 r ti A ptses of loadra ? 1.. of ttsetloa IS. Twsshlw to osatb. Range to cast. 1400114. coats, /74t14s. Sal a ?pertf NSWIr isa0 Ab" « follsare QgIP1 l at ?' ?aar1NP N Let 1, l? ? um's 9111114i ISR41 es re4er4ef tv plot Mdt' . si fog ('auto no*" -04 ""lles>Dawty, FIltlta+ sear Was the Patel of i yit tits tTi+lt 91114;!-91-wor it" +f at-lols street sM The worst R160fN ft+a? of4s0faa Aww4 MaosNlal is 4414 ilN L AM YAt1Ct41 aIRDtW*1tl1. 0014 041st tell 1ir'a!' s?aWAI foot arm the . 9wtJaest 4ar0sr of sold DIOLL AD TRIM'S XIVB$441 Uaiss too 114010 of im"flos for skis 06serlPtwa431 tiNa46 OW1413M, deem tys• f MssA% said Soot 1. ? AM VAIWO 01WIriS1ON. +s4 tta drat 11" of Lot To imii ?y1' 1 Ill?tvIelcM. rapeollvolf. 'elm betels dote Eaai Rt1Yt-+f•rlpgr Nils of y elydoq tw 10,640 teal to ism wlartwa sat arssr of that oerfsio property, its tni' If Qtftt{oi asN is so" "4. " iM of its rums It IoN+'M al Pigott" Csumly. 10440 0 dots Mlttm No PGW eR aB110f1116; ftwon s mil loss 141'i4'i!"e, ila q sold Yost tlsi 71 COL. Ni zog$@ ?Ivts L '? siiq 1414 not m1twor-way Itoo at. 1, far IOfM toot to tits Nwfimot server elf Sold Lot T. WALL APO TMA I , am `tits Me poles ¦f ltta'saottav of void foot fit f-4040" tine of QeMf , t and this SAM* WNot-sM11 It" of Lobos Sfreat. so00K4etm to sold tAKL !Ai 111pit ISIONt troves @Wat"11Ik1.41wm tlla Vwfb I Its at said bN I. maws. AIO z y 4U8lVtrt00. aN irs lertf ties of t+1 46 mid C ML +i TA 4`i M1rl IVFSMS 011 the t1M of but 11. out WML NO TM'c IlWIVISIOM. r"$"I1tetr, Nola boost good r" °`Aa0l11tiRyrf••ot 1104 at I'dW4 Strom. tar 410.96 foot to the NortMsat owsor of 6114 t 4A*A ML AM WO W4=MSMU t!l4S0/ iR10'10'OV. 01001 tb4 111101 Liao at 6411 LAS 9ML An U's ammalml. far 130.4f fast t0 the Matioeaf vorMr of sold Let 0. i ,?•1 ., A11111 =W11 W MrVWIQXf I600ss illr'Ql''47ti. 614 o fits tamlt hard sold loot S. r '^ '`6014 AID 3='S #MNflbldl. W OAS feet to the }a0tho"I artir of slit LAf 9. Om i? ;jois Un'S aMANlf f&, saps iNM 1114 toribseat aerssr as said aafaws prap4rtf deearitad o Official Restrd4 Oook w'44• PW 04!1 #oses NlO"O/ WC. tiavp tin Watt 1100 at 0414 eor041a prspertt doeerited Is afff! of Itvosr4s 1110A 744. POSo. 649 far 11.10 fat to ors Ilorttutpt 44t04t of avid 00rta10 propscir devar0a4 is Ortlslat Records talk 744. re a4ta foss" NM74'tliht, agog the Wttb time at said esrtels 00spartr dsearM4 f¦ 4tft4faf tloverlls heft 744. Pop 941. for god = fast to sew Folur or Wal mom. law" At (1.41 Cll W W *AVM I ttrrar of 4145erea 0.4m toot Iamt Sep 05 2005 3: 27PM R I W S. ASSOCIATES 40765509 P.8 1 t P INELL PO COUNTY FLA. GFF. RCC .185 12581 PG 1481 TOba'qM 1MMS A A fareel of Ited•iroleg a !larder! Of !04!100 M Ttl+lttsll M seetlt, &up lit goof. t lulus Goof$* oride. Nins mitre fart iwlarlr dssselaeo as-f l liiwt COMMIM at too ftu twist corset of Lot 1. *MLL,WT 't 4=1VISION ss r.wsoMd to Ptst goo ital. 10d4a 80 of too MNIs 41404144 of Fix 0040. Florida, assts below t1to s?elttt of lowseetlto of ff10 Ent ltlobt-st?V 1N rr4 ale 1101401 "t tN W06 !!!wilt-rrrtAry ItsN.t QJasatast Arsae rrssr111 eaMeeI1t.L CIO TAWS lflMibl>ttpl, sei! plat being lwflt'4tr"s, far 841.41 tart /f? > f 'Oeot aaroa+r at said ans. An TAWS 11MMIMM Ao10w the Mots of be-- 14 tat t 0 feiaslftlasli two## NWt4u3sMo 41406 ton 0011slss N sett tat I.'EANid. 111b 011POYlt.1011. a" the I14st If" of Lot 7* sold VMLJ. AM TXWV 011940401=tat. gas}as}1"ret batap sal! 8844! Riwftf•W" Iles of 11204016 vttsat. !or iW.60 feat to Ike N11r! t ap"M of sold Lai 7, 9AILL AND TAR`! tl1.01111stislf. sans befog She }slot a*1 tolo"10611 of 4414 rest 1"IM-01-ft Illte of Ossetia Urdot 4N ft* Seoul silt-ot•11y 1kit41tf a tfseat seufdiq to sold rMa Awl MTB'i @LVMVtii6lti asap 0100't7'tw"tt. 440.4800.411 ! to 11? SWAP~ Meet of Let tto sold WILL AM t TWIT 1111rO1VittVIl. Aslav ' fill petit st istarlootis4 of 4014 out 1!1*0t-afiky ftwe of 014sa1a street 01Eft -4 W, Ms to 1601-01-4leq Itaa of 6014 Lose ttrast. 1410 aide belo111+01111ar E390m ds ritldrab•ts'1:. along 440 Owl It" N 4atd Lit tt, tlMLL AM -'TATtC11 ttl?pmgtcR, s rlAe East 014I*91-fty Ilam of sold Oasssla strool. 444 the ortberly olttats1o0 of 1st lips of sold N1 ill iAllij.'AM TILTcoll 0=1vvstm. resweetttstr, for =&if feetr ibasoo 11ss'33'31 E. tag 34T.63 lest to - toga footI Right- i-wn, floe at uw tt FW1 Morrison Areaves tbaordti I WOt'3>"fl. ofsy'6414 11041 R1ebt-ef-4110r its. of Itsrlh I01lrt 08440 wAttetloe. for 11111621 !sets those* 1NM=1'IA4M. for Iss..s tests fkesss t04tett'a4`C. fa Neff tin" INSPO ON". tar 13.46: cost to e wslat as 14. Foot tIaa of ihq 84e 14.00 test of W Is. said F.ill<L Atilt TAIt111 smfvlsum law!" smi111120%,414j" 4rld east 11I%* of tht wool 10.00 feat st the Lot im, CMA. An TAE' % SMIv 44110, : 1 17 fait to a }aiwt to the saot$ line of ss64 Los is. ovu Awl TAfL's MWIF1 ,the Net11W*"v. elos* the south lies at Lots It. M. W 1st 91. said tIN11 L?ttfllf. respectively. fir 160.16 toot to the POINT OF eh3liNli m. (U mn " W ? atXtYlitfI error if e144ar** p1?E?'1?f11Y}?OQ109 L µ per. r ^.p 4 d at ** off Tp Pp"•F_F" star i Sep 05 2005 3:27PM RI ER & RSSOCIRTES 407#5509 P.9 EXHIBIT H Tltia3 Ez+x?tleaaa . ? ? , 4 1. Munk*W and zoi ft ordinances. r ; '? M? ' i ? 2. Taxes and uaessmonts for the year 2003 and subae a gt P INELLPS COUNTY FLR. ? C)t'F.REC . BK 3939 S Joe 1499 i 3. Rights of tenwits listed on atudm d Schedule undbs t' Gor'ded written leases with no rights rte, ?? of fast repeal to pie the property. i . Y 4. Esse lent grmated to Florida power c ?'V? c poration frotrx The F'arst j National Hank of Owwater, slated 3/27/A 71x2!70 in OIL Book 3347, Par 350, as re-recorded in D.R. Hook 3362, Page 13i8, .R Boot 3610. Pap 120, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 5. Survey by Florida Design ConsaYtepntkdate$.3enuary 23, 2003, disolosed the following: N. a. 'R e r oacla9renEs of the b tr s a l,Ot81 mad 2 over the South property line. b. Racroacbment of a oA-- tM+ass the Na* property tine of Lot 1 and the South pILWW ty line of Loth:'? c. Rights of the `e.ga,1 ? portion of the alley way over and across the South line ofLot 9. } ? • v 4 d. Eneroaadowht Wed paiking am across OW South property line of Lots 19,20, and 21. e. F.al meh ofavedaead power am with poles onto Lot 18 and the South property line qh* A:} ?f E E=o x eat ofsix foot chain-link fence over &e 33.$4 feet pMWIy line at the ?,$trh;io ciiarneat of overhm d wire over North property line of Lot 7 and Lot 8. tc.` . of wall over North property lino of Release Parcel W. 6. 0qMd-f0'0row"jk F.t ewwbula t betweoa AmSouth Bank of Flonda and the City of t"4V i, Florida;, elated Septeanber4,19K and =coded September 13, 1996, and in OAL Book 9M., Paige 1537, of the Public Records ofPinallss Comity Florida c?t[tav3a9s?.i . I j Sep 05 2005 3:27PM RI R & RSSOCIRTES i i SCumi3I•E LIST Or TENAM I ; Pkellaa comfy Tn C ? AniIIC d Dear C LW, Wa VDO l; i , Calvary Baptist Chu r& ` ! }J2 y ? '9 e I a i ! f r rs i N ?y 1 1 ti 4075509 p.10 p itCLLpM COUNTY FL.A. OFF . R= . BK 12581 PM 1493 -:. ISep 05 2005 3:27PM R'I E,WR & ASSOCIATES 40765509 Pinellas County Propc* Appraiser Information: 16 29.15 23814 000 0010 Page 2 of 4 16 / 291 15 / 23814 000 ! 0010 31-Aug-2005 Jiw Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:16:50 Ownership Information lien-Residential Property Address. Use, and Sales 400 CLEVELAND OBS: 12591 OPCi: 1407 406 S BRAND BLVD BLENOALE CA 81204-1704 EVAC: Men-EMC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 400 CLEUELAND ST of Jan 1. 2005, traced on Census Tract: 259.01 f 2003 - 2004 l : sa es rom 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) VacfImp Plat Information 3 /2,003 12,59111,407 0,200,000 (M) I foss: Book 881 Pas 928- 10/1,896 9,4611 560 3,100,000 (R) I 0600: Hook Pas - 0 to of 8 0 C ) 0000: Book Pas - 0 /o of 0 0 } 2006 Yalue EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 51800,000 Homestead: No Ownership % .000 Govt Exam: no Use %: .600 AsseasedlCap: 5,808.108 Institutional Exem: MD Tax Exempt X: .000 Historic Exam: Taxable: 5,006,080 Agricultural: 8 2004 Tax Information District: CV0 Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dew Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 124,640.00 Special Taut CUI .80 1) 100 x sits 2) 0 x 6 30.88 12,000.08 .06 .80 8 3) 0 x 0 .88 .60 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 6 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 6 x 0 .80 .60 148, 575.76 6) 8 x 6 .98 .98 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 140, 573. 76 Short Legal EARL A TATE'S SUB LOTS 1 6 2 LESS N 18 FT Description IM ALLEY Building information p. 11 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.Us&tbWC9i-=3?0= i&,a=-1&b=1&r--&s=-l&U=04=16+2 9+15+2... 8/3112005 Sep 05 2005 3:28PM RIE R & ASSOCIATES 40765509 p.12 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information; 16 29 15 00000 120 0300 Page 2 of 3 16 / 29 15 / ' 00000 / 120 / 0300 31-Aug-Z885 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser it:17:49 Ownership Information Vacant. Property Use and Sales 480 CLEUELAND 00K; 126$1 OPO: 1407 416 a BRAND BLUD GLENDALE 6A 91264-1704 EVAC: Men-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 1 of Jan 1, 2006. traced on Cenaus Tract: 259.01 l f 2003 - 2004 ga es rom : Q Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 3 12,113 1Z,51114.487 0,210,010 (M) I lsell Hook. Pgs - 1011,196 9,4011 560 3,100,000 (M) I see#: Book Pas - 0 /a 1/ 8 0 C } 1000: Book Pan - 1 /e of 8 0 L } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Juat/Market: 1,364,001 Homesteadi NO Ownership 2 .080 (3ovt Exam: NO use %: .680 Assessed/Cap: 1,364,000 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt Z: .188 Historic Exam: e Taxable: 1,364.000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Ontintown Bey ad view: 06 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Lana Land Front x Depth Price Units Math 04 Taxes: 17,036.05 i) 1 x 1 30.00 74,084.08 S Special Tax CVX .04 2) 8 x • .00 .08 3) 8 X 0. .08 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 8 x 8 .00 .00 cap. 2006 taxes will be 8) 1 x 0 .00 .00 33, 059.54 6) 1 x 1 .00 .04 Without any exemptions. 2006 taxes will be ; 59,154.54 Short Legal DES AT NU CDR OF LOT It OF EARL. AND TATES SUB TN N Description 233.16FT TN E 347.i5FT TN 9 206FT TN V 173.83FT TV S Building Information http://pw.co.pinclim.fl.u&%tbhVcgi-=3?o=l&a--i &b=1 &r-&a=t &1r-=0&p=16+29+15+0... 8/31/2005 Sep 05 2005 3:28PM RI R & nSSOCInTES 40715509 p.13 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Infom etion. 16 29 15 23814 000 0010 Page 3 of 4 gry and Lod Use c9do ' 10 / 29 / 15 / 23314 / 000 / 0010 :01 31-Bng-2086 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:16:58 Commercial Card 91 of i Improvement Types offices Property Addreses 408 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use; 331 Land Uses 23 Structural Elaman-ts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab an 8rado Exterior Wall Cone B1ocklBrick Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frarw Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Bp/Metal/gyps Cabinet 6 Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall, Total Units 0 Heating a Air MeatinoMooling Pekg Fixtures 82 Da.th. Tile Floor and Wall Electric ftbove Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Above Average Year, guilt 11,965 Effective Age 38 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 11.69 94,524 7) .80 0 2) Vt.ilitg .55 4.760 8) .00 9 3) .09 0 9) , 8o 9 4) .08 0 10) .90 8 5) .00 0 11) .00 8 6) .00 0 12) .88 .0 Cornm®rcial Extra Faaturaa Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 0 ELEY PASS 1818P 39,000.00 9 50.000 36,090 11865 2) FIREsmw 94614 1.75 14,634 165,610 66,240 1,965 3) CARPORT Zee$ 5.00 2.008, 14,906 51609 11965 4) ELEV STOP 9STGP 3,569.09 27 94,569 37.000 1,865 5) .08 0 9 0 0 5) .90 8 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 145,640 Pinellas County Property Appraise Jrr Parcel Information http:l/pw.co.pineUas.fl.usAhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1&a.=1&b-1&r&s=1&u=0&p=16-+29+l5+2... W1/2005 Sep 05 2005 3:28PM RIE R & ASSOCIATES 40 765509 p.14 I M i pinta county Property Appraiser hifinmation: 16 29 15 23814 000 0070 15 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 004 / 0070 Page 2 of 4 31-Aag-Z0A5 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:19;21 Ownership Information T Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales 490 CLEVELAND OSK: 12501 OPO: 1407 406 S BRAND BLVD BLENDALE CA 0i204-1794 EVAC; Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 406 CLEUELAND ST of Jean 1, 2005, based on Census Tract; 259.91 sales from 2003 - 2004; 0 / Sale Date OR Book/Page price (©uai/UnQ) Vac/Imp Information' Plat 3 /2.083 12,50111,407 0,200,800 (N) I isle: Book ONi Pie 026- 10/1,886 8,4111 560 3,180,000 (N) I 0008: Book PCs - 0 /0 of 8 9 ( ) 0009: Book Pigs - 0 I8 of 8 0 ( ? 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Markets 420.000 Homestead: ND Ownership x .098 Govt Exert: NO Use %. .000 Asseseed/Cap: 426,881 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt x; .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 420,186 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CND Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown De. 8d view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Unite M1eth 04 Taxes: 81100,97 1) 0 x 8 20.04 15,980.00 9 Special Tax cul .10 2) 0 x 0 .18 .18 3) 9 x a .08 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homea 4) 0 x 1 .04 .89 cap. 2005 taxes will be 6) 0 x 8 .00 .98 189178.62 6) 0 x 0 .04 .88 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxers will be ; 19,179.62 Short Legal EARL,& TOTE'S SUB LOTS 7 A 8 LESS ALLEY ON Description S BEING 5.1 FT ON W AND 3.8 FT ON E AND ALL LOT 9 Building Information http://pao.co.pintRas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l &a=18 1 &r=&s=l &w=08tp =16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 'Sep 05 2005 3:29PM RIE R ASSOCIATES 40765509 1 Pinellas County property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0070 Page 3 of 4 U de 16 / 29 15 123814 1 000 / 0070 ;01 [E31-?Aug--wZ685 Jim Smith. CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11110:32 cial Card at of 1 Improvement Type: Bank Branch ty Address: 400 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 331 Land Uses 23 St ruottlr a1 E 1 eprraen-t s Foundation Continuous Footing Heating 6 Air NeatingACooling Pckg Floor System Slab an Grade Fixtures 0 Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Bath Tile Clone Height Factor 0 Electric Average Party Wall None Shape Factor Rectangle Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&9teel Quality Average Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fran Year Built 1.865 Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Sups Effective Age 20 Cabinet 6 Mill Average other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Carpet Combination Function Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Brguall Economic Depreciation 0 Total Units 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.06 2,472 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 450 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .25 2,010 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .80 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Featur®s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year i) FENCE 37OLF 11.00 379 4,870 1,630 1.869 2) ASPNALT 60008F 1.50 6.000 191291 101200 808 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 11,830 P. 15 http://pao.co.pimll=A.ua&tbWcgi-sa3?o=l &*=1&b=18tr,8c?1&r-Qkp=16+29+15+2... 8!31/2005 .Sep 05 2005 3:29PM R.IE R RSSOCIRTES 407 65509 i j i i i i " i i Pinellas COUi property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0190 16 1 29 1 15 I 23814 / 000 / 0194 Page 2 of 4 31-Aug-2005 Jim smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:18:44 Ownership Information lion-Residential Property Address, Use. and Sales 400 CLEVELAND ODK: 12501 OPO: 1497 406 6 BRAND BLUO GLENDALE CA $1204-1794 EVAC: None-EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 400 1 LAURA ST of'Jan i, 2006, based on Census Tract: 250.91 2004 f 2003 : - sales rom 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 3 /2,003 12,59111,408 8,100,000 (N) I 1008 Book 1N1 Pgs 020- t0/f,196 9,4011 669 3,100,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pis - 0 /0 it 0 8 ( ) 1100: Book Pas - 8 Is 1l 0 1 ( ! 2006 Value EXEMPTIM Just/Market: 435,180 Momeetead: NO Ownership X .160 Govt Exam: NO Use '2: .080 Assessed/Cap: 435,100 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt 2: .000 Historic Exam: p Taxable; 435,109 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cue Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Bev Bd view-, 06 Millaie: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 6,531.ss 1) 160 x 122 to. 11 19, 528.99 S Special Tax 6tn .90 2) 0 x # .19 .00 S) 0 x i .09 .80 Without the Save-Our-Momse 4) 0 x 0 .01 .80 cap, 2006 taxes will be 6) 1 x 0 .08 .00 19.345. 61 6) s x 0 . •O .09 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 18, 545. 61 Short Legal EARL A TATE'S Son LOTS 19,26 b at AND V 10 Description FT LOT 19 Building Information httpJlpao.co.pmelias.fLuslhtbintegi-scf3?plw-l&r=0%2B08&o--l aF-l&b=l&c=1&,B=1... 8131/2005 p.16 Sep 05 2005 3:30PM RIEKER & ASSOCIATES 4073665509 p.17 Pinellas county Properly Appraiser information: 15 29 15 23814 000 0190 Page 3 of 4 , ftgRca and lmd Use Cade dantt o 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000•/ 0190 :01 31-Aug-2906 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:16:45 Commercial Card. of of 1 Improvement Typet Bank Branch Property Address: 40.0 LAURA 8T Prop Uee: 331 Land Use: 23 3-tructural Elamenta Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Blab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone BlocklStucco Height Factor v: Party Wall Hone Structural Frame None Roof Frame Bible & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish eryuaii Totai.Units 0. Heating & Air Heating&bCooling Pckg Fixtures 2 Bath Tile Floor Only Electric Average Shape Factor Square Quality Average Year Built 21062 Effective Age 3 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 6 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.66 432 i} .00 0 2) Carport .32 1,134 8) .00 0 3) .99 0 9) .90 0 4) .09 0 10) .11 1 5) .00 0 11) .10 6 6} .00 0 12) .00 0 Cck7nmerc:LvL1 E3mra Fe3-tures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) FENCE 100 5.00 100 Sol too tab 2) ASPHALT 161608E 1.56 leases 20;150 201350 106 3) SK aIM00Y 101000.06 1 30.,000 glove 21002 4) .00 0 1 0 0 5) .00 0 • 0 0 fi) .06 0 1 0 6 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 30.451 Map F4-K1 F*- 1 a I r -"' 1 9 1 n I hug:llpao. oo.pincHn.$.uelhtbinlcgi-=3?plus=l &r=O'lo2E08&0=I Stn=1 &b=18tC=18ts=1... 0112005 Sep 05 2005 3:30PM RIE ER & ASSOCIATES Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 040 0190 12,1 03 r? 1. 72 Ac 174(5?) r1Q F T 21 20 19----, 1 i i i L ?- I Sn x 407&665509 Page 4 of 4 1210 16 I? 7 12 2 .18 Uttp:llpao.co.pineno.ti.ua tbinlcgi-wr3?plus=I&r-0"/o2E08&a=l&a l&b=1&c=I8s=1... 8/3112005 AURA STREET Sep 05 2005 3:30PM RIE R & ASSOCIATES 40735509 Pinellas Records Clerk of the Circuit Coin Official Records Results Form Official Records Results Document Images none avabbte from January 1. 1997, Page 1 of I Aeria trype nst BooklRa no fret # :ET CLEARWATER P cessed: Pro EAU 8J29/7?10b te: 8131JZ4Q 3110:59:09 EDT 2005 (3anaral Cou rds KEN BETAKE CL? OF 7w Ca?1f i cow Pia t:ounl4R Flarfda Di: 1 thra 1 d 1 MAINSTREET CL,EARWATER DEVELOPMENT LLC to MAINS'TREET ` I + I CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT LLC Link Name oIF her Party inst Desert ion File Date Book Pa tnstr # INSTREET FIRST BAPTIST LT4 DESC LEARWATER OWN CHURCH OF DEED EARLL & 12/'1812043 13291 1011 2003622143 DEVELOPMENT CLEARWATER ATES SUB C INC ETC p.19 http:llpub itlet.co.pinellas.fl.uslofficiatevdoff'icialreclDMDAResults2.jsp?documentQuery... 8!3112005 ! Sep 05 2005 3:30PM RIE ER & ASSOCIATES 40735509 p.20 i 2003522143 BE: 13363 09. 1011, 12/18/2003 at 09;33 AN 12COttIM 4 WAN 0%9.80 D DOC tl 'TAMP OoximmON 611180.00 tO1RM= F. CE 37 MIL, CU.= or cam Pnl06LLA8 COUNTY, VIM= BY IMP= CLOG: CY4LPRi3 f { 1q '? cF 4'1.i PRRPAM BY Am ? i ' T?s C. Nash II, Madfarlane Fergumm llen 625 Court Street, 200 Poet Office Box 1 3 X33757) Clearwater, Floridk -3'3756 I - S INDEN•1 E made this day of December 2003, by and VIRST BAPTIST CM&M (0) CLUA lNAC1 . MC., a Fierida MM- ( --///t Corporation, Party of the First part, whose mailing address y -? 331 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 34615, and DD1iDiS' vMT .1 7 ''&&U MTiR DV)NLOPNMT, LLC, .a Florida Ilmdtad liability ccWmy, Party of the Second Part, whose mailing address is 206 S. Brand Blvd., Glendale, CA 91204. W I T N B S S E T N: That the said Party of the First Part, for and in consider- ation of the sun of Ten Dollars (010.00) to it in hand paid by the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of the Second Part, its heirs and assigro forever, the following described land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wits SEX T "A° ATTACHED H WM AND MADE A PART HEREW Subject to matters set forth in Exhibit •B• attached 1 hereto and made a part hereof. Parcel I'D.-No. 16 29 15 2381{ D00 0030• 1612913.5 23014/000/00401 16(29/15/23a14/00010050t 16/29/15/288141000/0100 Grantee's Tax I.D. No. / i i -1- jSep 05 2005 3:31PM RIEKER & RSSOCIRTES 407 665509 VISMIJA8 OOOM PL 088-. SEC. M 13261 PO 1012 And the said of the First part does hereby fully warrant the title to sai$ nd, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of rsons whensoever. { I TSSB WUMWF, the said Party of the First Part has her 'set its hand and seal the day and year first above writ- I t1}? i 3?ded, Sealod and Delivered First Daptist Church of i Four Bsesenaes C1eorMater, lac., a Florida non-profit corporation I I Sys Print Name Nam : Title: P i n se.-Sr.? ?*d?d'?lrla? PtiMOF Name i STATE OP PLORIDA COUNry OF PINBLLLS I HEIUHY CERTIFY, that on this day personally spp®ared before me, an officer duly authorised to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, lasses A. Ray, as President of First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc., a Florida non-profit corporation, to File personally known or who has produced am ideatification and who did take an oath, and known to me to be the individual (a) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes therain expressed. WITNESS my and official seal at Clea to said County and State, this day of December 300 . Notary P lic Print Name ?Cw:er Ny Canmission e.srrw,oxaw tigwll?rA11.lm? (SEAL) -2- p. 21 I Sep 05 2005 3:31PM R.I ER & ASSOCIATES 40765509 p.22 !Durum CWNW n 071x. mac. 89 13261 PLE 1023 r EXHIBIT "A" I (E UZ) of 1 ClW-,p [a b ML AM TA7M'S St1BOMMON hag to the Pot ilceW6 nPage 1% POW Rewads d Mbkoes?a Qm.*, FiocW d aMda Pkdtas Cm*f Nat nt r ? 1hae (3) and t m Vhd hdf d t at far (4) of MU AND 1Xf MMKV1WK sa-*i tq nwp a `-fit As aastarded 61 Plat Soak 1, Pop 20, Pubk Reostds d IAkbatow?la 1?tstty Fbfider of wfridt Ptateftt ?q' was ?+aM a paaaL i Pwad 3: latt S and 8 of EARtl AtO? TATE'9 Sd1MDIV61OM, amordkig to tl?e maP ar plst alwaeaf st recaladed M ! Plot Bask to Page 20, of do PAk Aeeorde d Hilkh mqh casuq, Rmltlat, d Oft Pk%dn cou"was faasaealya part. , ? Pamd9, Left 10 ad 11, less the Gut S feet tar afey, d PAIf<L AND TALE S SUBDWMMM of tot 3 of i BAOV MS PLACE h SecMSn 14 Tawraddp 29 Sauat{, Rsraga 15 East, Gs VMW Hwbo, Pbtds, aotor3q to pi0t thereof by t5rowf 4 Swiaglety Tampa Hoalda, AprM 2 ,188M nawded Ie Plot gook 1, i PsOa IQ M the PsMk Retards d FMllsboraagh tJecalK, RMda (saw PkuBes Cbataty, Roaldaj. Alto de$Wbd aw Lot lhrae (3) ad Moe VkK OV14 a6 (Mt ]A) dtat ftwM ft East one ha/ (E VZ) of Lot Faw ('1), Leta Rae (3)and SW ft wW Loft Ten (1M and Megan (11)L less the Bst S hd for &" of EARtL AND TATS-s , III ft the map crow dial aaf as waded to Plat Doak 7, Page 2q oldie flee Nemrdt d NtAshasoaagh county. fasalee, of whleh Pindss taarttY was femtetttr a paM. -3- Sep 05 2005 3:31PM RIE R & RSSOCIRTES 4073 5509 i VnUL M CCU Tr FL Mr. CSC. Ss 13261 PG 1016 i I i./- for the year 2004 and subsequent years, 4 ()4kes I,Q -fteetrk*0 Covenants and RestricBm CmW*om as set WK M Cnst C(aim ' Deeds neaNded in Deed Book 2. Page 127. and Deed Book 2, Page 129, bath in the PuW Records of Pinellas County, Florida (affects Parcels 2 and 3). i ?•, t L EalSwmmd for PtAft tdWON in aooordwm with a Final Decree entered March 22, 1950 and recorded In Chwamy Order Book 260, Page 221, Public Records of . Pinellas County, Florida (adlecta Parcel 3). 4. Easement grarted to City of Cdearwaler by ktWmmy d recorded in O.R. Book 9277, Pace 582, as srirordineded in the Consent to Easement and Subordination i of Interest recorded In Book 9277, Pape 1007, Public Records of PnaRas County, Fiordda (wffeft a portion of Panel 3). I i p. 23 'Sep 05 2005 3:31PM RI ER L ASSOCIATES 40j665509 p.24 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0030 Page 2 of 4 16 / 29 ! 15 / 238141 000 1 0030 31-Aug-2805 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:69:40 ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales MAINSTREET CLEARWATER BEY OBK: 13211 Opal fell 206 S BRAND BLUB SLENDALE CA 91204-1310 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 410 CLEVELAND ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 250.01 2003 f 2004 - a salve rom 0 Sale Date OR BooklPage Price (4uai/Unq) Vac/Imp Plat'Information 1212,003 13,26111,011 1,500,000 (M) I 1000: Book 0N1 Pgs.020- 11/1,904 8,8491 073 750,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs : - 3 /1,982 5, 326'11, 593 556,602 (H) I 0000: Book Pgs, - 10/1,901 5,2631 138 605,000 (U) I 2006 value EXEMPTIONS Juat/Market: 530.800 Homestead: NO Ownership 1 .088 Oovt Exam; NO Use %: .000 Asaoseed/Cap: 530.000 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt x: .008 Historic.Exem: 0 Taxable: $30,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District; CND Seawall; Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Boy Bd view: 06 Mi.llagea 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Lanai Front x Depth Price Units Math 04 Taxes: 11,845.60 1) 75 x i 28 30. 00 9,110.00 S Special Tax CHI .06 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) B x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 6) 1 x 0 .90 .00 12, 043.72 6) ! x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 12, 045.72 Short Legal EARL & TATE'$ SUB LOT 3 AND d tt2 LOT 4 Description LESS N 18 FT IN ALt[T Building Information http://pao.co.pinelW.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1&a=1 &b-1&r--&s--1&u-0&p=1 6+29+-15+2... 8/3112005 'Sep 05 2005 3:32PM RI ER & ASSOCIATES 40#65509 i i Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0030 Page 3 of4 kmpg* and LaW Use Cott d 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0030 :01 31-Aug-2995 lim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:09:49 Commercial Card e1 of 1 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 41• CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 353 Land User 71 81-.ruazura]. EXamarma Foundation Continuous Footing HeatinO & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Floor System Slab on Braude Fixtures i• Exterior Wall Cenc Block/Stucco Bath Tile None Height Factor a Electric Average Party Wail N"s Shape Factor Rectangle Structural Frame None Quality Average Roof Frame riot Year Built 1,920 Roof Cover Built Op Mead Effective Age 49 Cabinet & Mill Average Other Depreciation • Floor Finish Carpet Function Depreciation • Interior Finish Plastered Direct Economic Depreciation 9 Total Units 0 Sub ?reaa Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.99 e;OSe 7) .09 0 2) utility .49 7,175 8) .88 9 3) Canopy .IDs 268 9) .99 0 4) .90 9 10) .09 0 6) .90 0 11) .00 9 6) .90 9 12) .00 0 Comm$rc3.a1 ExTva FmmTurss Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .09 • 0 0 0 2) .00 • a 0 0 3) .•• 0' a 0 D 4) .90 • 0 0 6 6) .•0 a 6 • D 6) .90 0 0 • O TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 9 p. 25 http://pas.co.pinew.fl.U? h*wcgi-scr3?o=l&a=1&b==l&r-&s-1&u-O&p-16+29+15+2,.. 8/3112005 j Sep 05 2005 3:32PM RI R &_nSSOCIRTES 4071$5509 p.26 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0040 Page 2 of 4 i 16 / 28 / 18 / 23814 / 000 / 0040 31-Aug-2815 Jim Smith. CPR Pinellas County Property Appraiser ti:t9:22 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Rddress, Use, and Sales HRINSTREET CLEARWATER DEU OBK: 13861 OPO: 1,811 286 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91304-1310 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 418 CLEVELAND ST of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 256.91 20 l 20 es from 03 - sa 04: 9 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/unQ) vaclImp Plat'In€ormation 12/2,093 13,26111.111 1,591,000 (K) I 1908: Book But Pas 929- 1111.194 0,8401 673 751.010 (U) I 0900: Book Pigs - 3 /1,911 5.92611.593 551.006 (N) I 0000: Book Pgs - . 10/1,891 5,2631 136 665.000 {U} 1 2005 value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market, 111,610 Homestead: NO Ownership 1 .110 Bcvt Exam: N0 Use %; .080 Asseeeed/Cap, i61,600 institutional Exam: ND Tax Exempt X: .000 Historic Exam: 0 Taxable: toi.106 Agricultural: 9 2004 Tax Information District: cup Seawall: Frontage; Clearwater Borntom Dev ed view-, 05 Millaget 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth. 04 Taxes: 4,615.61 i) IS x 121 31.00 3.609.00 S Special Tax CUI .09 2) 9 x 0 oe .09 3) 8 x . 0 .00 .60 Without the Save-Our-Homss 4) 0 x e .60 .01 cap, 2005 taxes will be It 5) 0 x 0 .80 .00 4,406.32 6) 8 x 8 .00 .09 Without any exemptione, 2005 taxes will be 4.49S.32 Short Legal EARL Q TATE'S 900 E 1/2 BF LOT 4 LESS N 19 Description FT IN ALLEY Building Information I hup://pao.co.pinelias, fl.us&tbin/egi-scr3?owl &a=18tb--t&r-&s=I &U=O&pr=16+29+15+2... 813112005 'Sep 05 2005 3:33PM RI #R & ASSOCIATES 407 65509 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29-15 23814 000 0040 31-8ug-2006 Jim: Smith, CFA Pinellas County, Property Appraiser 11:10:22 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 410 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 Page 3 of 4 ?p§y d Land Use Code desc 2WM 18 / 291 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0040 :01 SVrucVural Elemeonts Foundation Spread/Main Footing Floor System Slab on Orade Exterior Wall Cunc Block/Stucco Height Factor • Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Bar.3oist.Mgid Fran Roof Cover Built Bp/compooition cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Orquall Total Units 0 Ha&tint & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures S Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle quality Average Year Built 1,916 Effective Age 40 Other Depreciation • Function Depreciation • Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area i) Base area 1.00 2.075 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 1,372 6) .09 0 3) .19 0 9) .00 0 4) .99 0 10) .01 0 5) .00 0 ii) .01 a 6 ) .98 0 12) .08 0 Cc mmetrcial ExTw= F$=turaa i Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year i) ./• 1 • a 0 2) 0 0 0 3) .04 / • 0 0 4) .0• 9 0 0 0 6) .0• • • 0 a 6) .0/ • 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 p.27 httpolpao.co.pinelb&fl.uatlbWcgi-scr3?o=I&a-l&b=1&rr-&s--18tu=O&p=16+29+25+2,., 8!3112005 Sep 05 2005 3:33PM RI ER & nSSOCInTES 407 65509 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0050 1. ! I 16 129 1 15 / 23814 004 / 0450 Page 2 of 4 31-Aug-7001 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser !1:11:39 Ownership Information Non' Residential Propertg Address. Use, and Sales MRINSTREET CLEMWATER UEV OBK: 19261 OPO: 1011 206 S BRAND BLVD BLENBALE CA 112041310 EVAC: Nan-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 424 CLEVELAND 9T of Jan 2, 2005, based on Census Tract: 252.61 sales from 2003 - 2004: p Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UmQ) Vacilmp Plat'Information 1212,093 13.26111.911 1,590.940 (N) I 1989: Book 0H1 Pas 020- 0800: Book pan - It/1,094 0,9401 173 0 11,080 5,4241 200 750.400 (0) 205.400 (4) I I 0000; Book Pan - 6 /1,074 4,23511,544 46.909 (8) Y 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 605.600 Homestead; RO Ownership t .000 govt Exam: NO Use %. .806 Assessed/Cap: 605,600 Institutional Exert: NO Tax Exempt 7t: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 665.680 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: con Seawall: Frontage: Ciearaater Downtown Dev Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.Z372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 13,003.40 1) 100 x its $0.04 12.000.60 S Special Tax CVI .90 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 6 x 0 , 00 .06 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .04 .00 cap. 2005 taxes will be ; 5) 0 x 9 .04 .06 14.670.05 6) 0 x 0 .09 .06 Without any exemptions. 2006 taxes will be 14. 676.03 Short Legal EARL d TATE'S SUB LOTS 5 AND 6 LESS N 10 FT Description IN ALLEY p.28 Building Information http Jipw.co.pincHn.fLus/htbin/cgi-scr32o=1 &a=l &,b-1 &r=&s-l &u=O&P =16+29+15+2... 8/3W005 Sep 05 2005 3:34PM RI R & ASSOCInTES 407#5509 p.29 ' Pi=Uas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0050 Page 3 of 4 $Wer?yand Laird-_Use Code dear #90 16 / 29./ 15 l 23814 000 0050 .01 31-Ang-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:11:21 Commercial Card 01 of 1 Improvement Type: oti•ices Property Address! 422 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 3S3 Land Use: 71 struC-tura1 EXent ents Foundation Spread/!lane Footing Floor System Slab on grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor • Party Wall None Structural From Noce Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plastered Direct Total Unite • Heating & Air HeatingACooling Pckg Fixtures i• Bath Tile Nano Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,975 Effective Age 49 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 sub "IEMNS Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.08 10,290 7) .00 0 2) .06 9 8) .00 9 3) .06 0 9) .08 9 4) .01 0 10) .90 0 5) .00 0 11) .80 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra F?a-turE:s bsecription Dimensions Price units value RCO Year 1) ASPHALT 1296 SF 1.59 11299 1,ea• 11060 M 2) FIRESPRIMK 112999F 4.75 16,200 17,050 15.710 149!6 3) .00 a • 0 i 4) .01 0 • 9 • 5) .6• 0 • 0 0 6) .•• 0 • 0 • TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 17,519 Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinallas.fl.us&tbinlegi-scr3?o-l &gL=1&b=1&r-&s=I &u=O&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Sep 05 2005 3:34PM RI ER & nSSOCIRTES 407 65509 p.30 Pinellas Co" Property Appraiser Wonnation: 16 29 15 23814 000 0100 Page 2 of 3 16 / 291 15 / 23814 f 000 / 0100 31-Aug-2815 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:12,28 Ownership Information Vacant Prepsrty Use -and Sales MAINSTREET CLERRVATER BEV O BK: 18261 OPO: 1011 286 9 BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91184-L118 EVAC: Non»EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based an census Tract: 259.91 saxes from 2009 - 2004; 0 Sale Date OR Back/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imps Plat'Information 1212.993 13,25111,911 1,590,440 (H) I 1808: Book ON1 Pgs 920- 11/1,994 0,8491 673 758,188 (U) I 0080: Book Pat 5 /1.992 5,34212,693 162,548 (0) 9 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /I 4 8 ( 3 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 142,900 Homestead: NO Otmership X .009 Govt Exam: NO use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 142.900 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt x: .000 Historic Exam: 8 Taxable: 14 2,800 Agricultural: 4 2004 Tax Information District: CUD 5eawa11: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Des Sd view: 05 Mlillage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Math 04 Taxes: 9,173.55 i} 95 x 139 13.08 12;, 350.98 9 Special Tax CUI .09 2) 0 x 9 .00 .98 3) 0 x 9 .60 .08 Without the Save-Our-Htomse 4) 4 x 0 .60 .08 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 9 x 0 .60 .04 3,463.50 6) 9 x 0 .00 .04 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 3.463.59 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB LOTS 19 499 It LEGS E 5FT Description FOR ALLEY $uuikftg Information Mtp://pao.copinellas.fl.UsAitbin/cgi-sor3?o=1&a-=1&b=l&i 1&u-O p-16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 I !Sep 05 2005 3:35PM RIFY-FR & ASSOCIRTES 4075509 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0100 Per ty ad Lod YM Code des=WQw. 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0100 p.31 Page 3 of 3 31-Aug-2015 Jiro Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 1i:lY:Yi Vacant Parcel Property Use: 290 Land Use: 11 vacant Extra Fea'tura3s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year i) ASPHALT 9090 1.59 5, 00• • 74.501 •10 2) .0• 8 • • 0 3) .0• t 0 • 0 4) .0• • • • 0 S) .11 • • • 0 6) .0• 0 0 0 1 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 71502 Back to Seamh Page An Mlanation of this screen http://pao.copin,cUw.fl.u &tbin/cgi..=3?oml&a-I th=1&r=&a=ldtu=0&P=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 'Sep 05 2005 3:35PM R,I R & RssocInTES 407 65509 i Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0180 16 291 151/ 23814 / 000 J 0180 p.32 Page 2 of 6 31-Mrs-2805 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:!3:58 Ownership Information Non-Residential Proverty Address, Use, and Sales MTBUFF INC OBK: !1139 OP©; 1283 6001 22ND RUE 4 or ST PETERSBURB URG FL 33710-9845 C) ?((f 49 eh 0al.IVAM Nan-EYAC O_C _ Comparable sales value as Prop Addr. 416 LAURA ST of Jan t, 2006, based on Census Tract: 238.01 004 sales from 2003 - 2 : 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page: Price (QuailUnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,802 11,83912,283 870,408 (N) I 1808: Book 8N1 Pgs 029- i /1,088 10,33211,881 225,888 (Q) I 8008: Book Pia - 0 8 0 ( ) Soso.: Book Pas - s a 0 ( ) 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 2791840 Homeetesad; NO Ownership % .800 [govt Exem; No Use %; .485 Assessed/Cap: 279.080 Institutional Exam: No Tax Exempt X: .990 Historic Exam: 9 Taxable; 278,080 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: cue Seawall; Frontage: Clearwater Gountem Bev Bd View: 06 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Unite Meth 04 Taxes: 6,591.52 i) i8 x 123 15.08 71386.40 S Special Tax CVI .00 2) 0 x 8 .88 .00 3) 0 x 9 .40 .90 Without the Save-Our-domes 4) 9 x 0 .99 .s0 cap. 2005 tastes will be 5) 0 x 0 .46 . SO i, 712.18 6) 0 x 9 .08 .09 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be : 6, 712. i 8 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB V 26FT OF LBT 17 & E 40FT Description OF LOT 10 Building Inlbrmatien, http:lfpao.co.pinellas.fl.u&40in/cgi-scr3?plus=1&rd)'/o2E08&o=l &a=-1&b=l&c=1&s=l ... 8/3112005 iSep 05 2005 3:35PM RIOR & ASSOCIATES 407dr5509 I Pinellas County Prope dy Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0180 • Buildici? 11 . Wilding 22 • iHu idtz?s' 3 Building #1 Page 3 of 6 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0180 :01 31-Aug-2685 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:13:46 Commercial Card 01 of 3 Improvement Type: Retail Store Property Address: 416 LAURA BT Prop Use: 327 Land Use: 12 Structural E14?n?slts i Foundation Continuous footing Floor Sysiam slab on Srade Exterior Wall Concrete Black Weight Factor 0 Party Wail None Struotural Frame None. Roof Frame Fiat Roof Cover Built UplMoed Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Terrazzo Ilona Interior Finish Plastered Direct Total unite e Meeting & Air HaatingaCooling Pckg Fixtures 2 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,957 Effective Age 10 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Bass Area 1.06 591 7) .10 / 2) Canopy .25 400 8) .30 • 3) .98 0 9) .80' 9 4) .40 0 iQ) .00 9 5) .80 0 li) .09 9 6) .69 9 12) .90 9 iC0nWR 0rc3La1 EXTWO F0="tU3V0'S Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) CONC PARE 2840 3.06 2,840 6,120 6,120 090 z) .09 9 0 / / 3) .00 / 0 / t 4) .00 / 0 5) .00 / 0 6) .06 8 0 0 / TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 6,129 Building #2 p .:3 3 hUp:1/pao.co.pineHw.fl.u&&tbWot-scr3?pbm=1&r=0*/.2B08&&o=1&a=1 &b=1 &c=1 dtff--l... 8/3112005 i Sep 05 2005 3:35PM RIWR 11 RSSOCIRTES 40765509 p.34 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 13 23814 000 0180 Page 4 of 6 18 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0180 :02 31-Aug-20.5 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:13:53 Commercial Card 02 of 3 Improvement Type: Duplex/Triplex Property Address; 416 LAURA ST Prop Uaa: 327 Land Use: 12 S-truc-tural E18m.snCs Foundation Spread/None Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor • Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry PlllaraSteel Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built.Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plastered Direct Total Units I Heating A Air Neating&Cooling Pckg Fixture" Bath Tile Mona Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,097 Effective Age 20 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Awams Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Bass Area 1.19 1.246 7) .00 0 2) Upper Stry Bass Area .1• 792 e) .00 0 3) .01 0 9) .00 0 4) .•• a i0) .00 0 6) .09 0 11) .09 • b) .00 • 12) .00 • Coimmear?ial Extra Fs?e-turss Description Oimshsions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) FIREPLACE I •11.00 1 010 see 1,97$ 2) PAT16/DECK 494 0.50 494 -4,200 1,600 1,975 3) .00 0 - 0 0 0 4) .99 0 0 0 1 6) .00 0 0 1 0 0) 1 .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 2,400 Buildlag #3 hdp Jlpao.co.pinellm.fl.us/htbi Wcgi-scr3?plus=18ra--0%2$08&o--l &a=1 &b=1&o=181... &131/2005 Sep 05 2005 .3:36PM RI?R & nSSOCIRTES 407W5509 I Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0180 p. 35 Page 5 of 6 18 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0180 :03 31-Rug-2805 Jim Srd.th, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:19:56 Commercial Card 09 of 9 Improvement Type: Retail Store Property Address; 416 LRBRA ST Prop Use; 327 Land User 19 9*tructural EJLear an-to Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Fraams Flat Roof Cover Built Upldood Cabinet 8 Mill Average Floor Finish Nardrood/Parquet Interior Finish Brgaall Total Units it Heating 6 Air NeatingMeoling Pckg Fixtures z Bath Tile Rune Electric Rverage Shupe Factor Rectangle quality overage Year Built 1,157 Effective Age f0 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 SUtb Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base area 1.00 750 z) .08 0 2) .00 0 0) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) -*8 • 4) .00 0 10) .00 1 6) .00 0 ii) .00 • 6) .60 a 12) .00 • C e zrc:Lal Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Value Units RCO Year i) .08 . 0 0 0 0 2) .98 0 1 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .19 0 0 0 • 6) .00 0 0 0 • 6) .00 0 0 0 1 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 1 NeapFAtj http://pac.co.pincUas. Q.us&*in/ogi-aar3?phie=1 &r--O'/o2EO8&o=i &a-=Z &b=18tc=1&9=1... 8/3112005 'Sep 05 2005 3:36PM RI*R a ASSOCIATES 407#5509 i Pinellas County Propatty Apprais" Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0180 i ' c i s Page 6 of 6 ML 0 LL p.36 l http:/lpa,o.co.pincHu.fl.usThtbinlcgi-scr3?plus-l &r=0%2E0 8&o- l &er--1&1=1 &c=1 &s= 1... 8/3112005 LAURA STREET S?AL? 8/24/2005 ' l Receipt #: 1200500000000008204 2:37:04PM q ?= Date: 08/24/2005 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2005-08084 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid I • Check RIEKER AND ASSOC INC Q R_D 10047 O N a In Person Payment Total: 1,205.00 $1,205.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt iJC)(!l;il?t{; I;}? i? I?'at?A.?i%G'ic: D-Vebp rent k'11-- 13;e;!'erg const![, Icl?J@iV ;lt'.S RECEIPT OF HAND DELIVERY Application Number: L. o??s - b?? Name: TH Management LLC 400 Cleveland St., Suite 900 Clearwater, FL. 33755 This will acknowledge receipt of the following documents: ORIGINAL • Development Application, Project Narrative and Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application 1 original 14 copies • Stormwater Reports, Drainage Calculations, Tree Surveys and Tree Inventory 1 original 14 copies • Full size and 11 x 17 drawings 1 original 14 copies • Vacation Request Filing Form 15 copies (Originals submitted to public works-engineering) • Survey Document 1 original 14 copies D l!? l?J u • Traffic Studies 3 originals AUG 2 4 2Q05 1 CD hereby acknowledge receipt of said documents from Mark Rieker of Rieker & Associates, Inc. on Iav of Aueust-,2005. I. VLI -l ?(VU Print ame;. j tr- L I? JA fJAJS (.0''fiiii?t::i?i Davt'.inatY;i'.?;Dilcir 'nl. rO?ECi ?:??Cr' 8 1020 N CNando AVO, S: ,t:1 1510 Ma Piand, R. 327:,'; ph. 321.200 3 9;3 0'.628.2105 ,...,._ tax: ?1J0 (:fi.`1SrUCiiGft SBN{Ct+i RECEIPT OF HAND DELIVERY Application Number: _r?? -o4c;:)dmq , Name: TH Management LLC 400 Cleveland St., Suite 900 Clearwater, FL. 33755 This will acknowledge receipt of the following documents: ORIGINAL • Development Application, Project Narrative and Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application 1 original 14 copies • Stormwater Reports, Drainage Calculations, Tree Surveys and Tree Inventory 1 original 14 copies • Full size and 11 x 17 drawings 1 original 14 copies • Vacation Request Filing Form 15 copies (Originals submitted to public works-engineering) • Survey Document 1 original ; wD •?? 14 copies luJ ,?U L • Traffic Studies 3 originals AUG 2 4 M 1 CD PLAN'NiwG ..p.:..... CATY hereby acknowledge receipt of said documents from Mark Rieker of Rieker & Associates, Inc. on tha day of August , 2005. Print LoIT n)o ' al Deveiapinon'Lv":Gl?Sii'i . !Gil/P;Cj Ct Mmagernenf Services 1020 N, Orianda d.ve, Si i!C 5o W"!ar-d Fl. 3?751 ph: 321 206.3399 fax: 40;'.62.$.2105 ,.Clearwater U • Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 • CASE #: I-U "X)J'U 0U1S ?N DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1.205.00. * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) (? FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIoQRIG I NA L Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: TH Manaciement LLC . 7n MAILING ADDRESS: 400 Cleveland Street. Suite 900. Clearwater, FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 461-0794 FAX NUMBER: (7271461-0784 PROPERTY OWNER(S): See enclosed "Property Ownership Affidavit" PIAP(ti;:°a?; (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6)?--w QIY AGENT NAME: Mr. Mark Rieker MAILING ADDRESS: 1020 N. Orlando Avenue. Suite 150. Maitland, FL 32751 PHONE NUMBER: (321) 206-4123 FAX NUMBER: (407) 628-2105 CELL NUMBER: (3211 287-5677 E-MAIL ADDRESS: mrieker(& iekerassociates.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 400 Cleveland Street plus new development sites as described within this application LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See enclosed Survey (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See enclosed Survey PARCEL SIZE: 4.06 acres. 176.646 sf (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: See enclosed Project Narrative (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See enclosed Project Narrative Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO X (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C., PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) Z SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHI ( ee page 6) Affidavit Attesting Ownership Enclosed r1 n I (? n D T WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See enclosed Project Narrative 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See enclosed Project Narrative 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. See enclosed Project Narrative 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See enclosed Project Narrative AUG 2 4 2005, 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Project Narrative 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See enclosed Project Narrative Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See enclosed Project Narrative Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See enclosed Project Narrative 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See enclosed Proiect Narrative ORGNA 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See enclosed Project Narrative 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See enclosed Project Narrative 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Project Narrative 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See enclosed Project Narrative 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See enclosed Project Narrative 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See enclosed Proiect Narrative 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division. of ice 3 applicable,); Use separate sheets as necessary. r I ? (? ?.P ? -, <! . i See enclosed Project Narrative ? AU 1 ??1? Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • 0 ( E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design ?I Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: ORIGINAL _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL / (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable e Acknowled ement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): lZZS rmwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; 1,d LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; 0011*- PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; t O PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"):LptING All dimensions; No rth arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: ORIGINAL Land area in square feet and acres; _ Number of EXISTING dwelling units; _ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; _ Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. EDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'/Y X 11) and color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; _ Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; _ All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. NDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; _ Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); _ Irrigation notes. I?Y REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible); IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. a«x4 2005 Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2dw.Qt WXJAhA YJ ltd -- I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as o Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ORIGINM BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/z X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) (Set I )ao&hve) V° All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. LP/ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) p dl Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). 114/ Reduced signage proposal (8'/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) LO/include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) / Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. (,rD Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): W4Graffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these contact the City Public Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all repretbehfatio application are true and accurate to the best of my nowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in thi n. Signatu of property owner or representative .aWTp?a,. Saundra I r SVGS Grangqe T T .LPF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINEh S Swofn to and subscribed before me this day of Nu v4 A.D. 200-S ta-cxi by ?n ieleAv- who s personally known as produced as identificati o ary public, / N y commission expires: ?(• `I O? Expires September 24, 2008 Bonded Troy Fain - Insurance, Inc 600-385.7019 Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) U I\ I v 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and its adjacent development parcels 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true e operty Owner-400 a C; by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner-Mai street Clearwa ev ent, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Manag Property Owner-Laura Steee evelo pent, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this b5 day of Auaust 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke who h ing been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. 'Notary Public My Commission Fires: OAPME o #DD 205794 QQ` "y9. ;?aye0ndedlhN c?a?:' pQ? ,..?.. -. ."ubli:::d:e`\ NRiAUIG S T A t t SAP/anning DepartmentlApplication Formsldeveloantz`ble development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc 2 4 Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 9 Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) Proposed Development Program: Existing 9 story office: Movie Theater: Retail: Residential: Projected value: 87,800 sf 55,000 sf 43,500 sf 245 units $200 million plus Parking Table: Code Ratio Office (*grandfathered) 2/1000* sf Movie Theater 4/1000 sf Retail 4/1000 sf Subtotal ("Public" Spaces) Residential (Private) 1.5/unit Totals Code Min Spaces 200* 220 174 594 368 962 ORIGINAL Spaces Provided 200 220 175 595 AUG 2 4 2005 Development Density Calculations: 1. Non-residential uses/density calculations: Office 87,800 sf - 4.0 FAR density = Theater 55,000 sf 4.0 FAR density = Retail 43,500 sf _ 4.0 FAR density = Land required for non-residential uses: 2. Residential density calculations: Total Land within development parcel Less land required for non-residential uses Land available for residential use x 43,560 sf/acre = x 70 units per acre = Proposed residential density Quantity of units needed from Bonus Pool 21,950 sf land needed 13,750 sf land needed 10,888 sf land needed 46,588 sf 176,646 sf (46,588) sf 130,058 sf 2.99 acres land available 209 units allowed by code 245 units 36 units DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) *Existing office parking is grandfathered at approximately 2/1000 (200 Cars). SVCSI i 9 • Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA ORIGINAL 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA: ?ri The proposed development positively addresses all of the goals and objectives of the City's Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Core District. The Downtown Core District criteria encourages mixed uses to attract residential and retail activities while continuing to support business uses and this project includes all of the development components desired by the City toward achieving this combination of uses. The proposed development is in harmony with the Downtown Design parameters established for the district as well as surrounding buildings. The Cleveland Street fagade respects the historic "main street" character with traditional architectural elements and materials. All proposed street facades are very pedestrian friendly incorporating extensive on-street retail and restaurant spaces as well as corresponding traffic calming elements where appropriate. The tower design takes its cues from the City's investment in the Public Library, and transitions the old to the new with a more contemporary fagade, but remains in keeping with the established design guidelines by incorporating step-backs as well as traditional base, middle, top features in the architectural fagade. The City has identified this property as a "Superblock" site within its Redevelopment Plan, and has concluded that it is the preferred. location for a multi-plex movie theater and entertainment complex combined with public parking uses that support the Coachman Park Master Plan as well as future plans for the Harborview Center property. All of these development components are included in the proposed development plans submitted herein. 2. The proposed development will contribute significantly to the revitalization of downtown, and will provide a community atmosphere where residents can live, work, and recreate, all within walking distance of their front door. It also creates an attractive downtown destination or visitors and the public with ample parking and a variety of potential activities including C o njoying outdoor events at Coachman's Park, convention center activities, library visits, Z ersonal training/fitness, restaurants and first run movies. Without question, the proposed evelopment will enhance property values regionally and spur additional local development a4 cD_ (opportunities. o ? M M The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing 0 or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. Considering the nature of the proposed development, the region will certainly benefit from a more inviting, affluent and secure Z environment for workers, residents and visitors alike. ?he proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Separate entrances and exits are incorporated into the parking garage for the separate user groups. Residential condominium owners will enter at the northwest corner of the garage on Osceola Street, and all others will enter at the northeast corner of the garage on Fort Harrison Street. A drop-off feature is incorporated into the entry area of the residential building, and additional traffic relief is provided by way of drop-off and pick-up opportunities on Laura Street for restaurant and theater patrons. As exhibited in the above parking table, parking is adequate for all proposed uses, and is further enhanced by allowing the office parking spaces to be accessed by the public during non-standard business periods. This results in a total of 595 parking spaces available for public uses during evenings and weekends, providing highly desired relief for the City to reduce the parking demand on surface parking lots surrounding the Library and Harborview Center. The benefits to the City include enhanced opportunities for • • Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE ORIGINAL CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites the future redevelopment of these sites, plus long-term revenue opportunities generated by the City owned parking stalls. 5. The proposed development is located within the Downtown Core character district of the downtown redevelopment plan. This Vision established for the district includes high density and mixed use development consisting specifically of the types we are proposing for this site. This is accomplished without sacrificing the objective of maintaining a pedestrian-friendly environment and an architectural style respectful to the historic fabric of Clearwater. The proposed development honors the principal elements of the City's vision for the district while setting a stage for high quality development on surrounding parcels. C6.i The proposed development contains a variety of permitted and encouraged uses as described within Downtown Redevelopment Plan. These uses include residential dwellings, retail and restaurant uses, office uses, health club facilities, and first run movie theaters. Although the combination of independent venues will certainly introduce a wide range of operating hours and sensory experiences, all of the uses are considered to be Class A in nature and intended to complement one another, thus avoiding adverse effects to either internal or external users patrons or neighbors The proposed development is located on one of the key redevelopment parcels identified in the City's downtown core redevelopment plan, and considerable effort and care have been taken to comply with or exceed all of the City's objectives for the site. We have accomplished this in the true spirit of a public-private partnership which has resulted in the successful incorporation of the multi-plex movie theater venue, and public parking component within the proposed development. AIIG 2 4 2005 LANNING & DE SVCS• ,M,. QTY 4F -C- L.4 • 0 Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA ORIGINAL 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA: 1. The redevelopment of the parcel is economically impractical without deviations to the intensity and development standards. Although greater density bonuses were originally contemplated by the City for sites within the downtown core, the proposed development is requesting just 36 additional dwelling units to meet the density needs of the project. Greater density bonuses, although desirable in terms of economic feasibility, would have necessitated an increase in building height, and although the district guidelines contain no height limitations per se, certain sensitivities to this subject have been historically prevalent in the City, and this knowledge has detracted from the developer's desire to request density bonuses beyond what is absolutely necessary to make the project viable. In addition to density bonuses, the project is negotiating TIF funding with the CRA to compensate for the added parking to be owned and operated by the City. The TIF funding will provide for the design and construction of the City owned spaces as well as reasonable allocations for the cost of land and development soft costs. J 2. The proposed comprehensive infill project will contribute to the redevelopment goals for downtown with fully developed project values estimated to be in excess of $200 million overall. This value represents the direct impact of the project only. It is also anticipated that an indirect effect on surrounding areas will include significant additional capital investment which will further enhance the positive impact of future tax increment to the city. i 3. The proposed uses for the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are both permitted and encouraged by the City of Clearwater. Each proposed use is clearly identified in the redevelopment plan and other documents published by the City of Clearwater and the Economic Development Department. 4. The uses within the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses and the downtown redevelopment plan's vision statements. M Cleveland Street has been maintained as a primary "and Street" retail corridor with entries to the movie theaters, restaurant locations, and an internal retail "mall". The street ( fagade on Osceola Street is pedestrian friendly, incorporates street retail frontage, and z ?P- takes full advantage of the outstanding views to the bay with extraordinary restaurant ?o locations incorporating outdoor seating at the western terminus of Laura Street. The tv r( u?i residential component will enhance the community aspect of downtown and provide an o o- immediately accessible demographic for the support of the movie theaters and restaurant a C?Z3 and retail establishments in the area. rn ?n -+ f Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the i CA comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of } 21 l Clearwater. This development site offers unique opportunities to satisfy the amount of contiguous space needed for movie theaters and destination-type retail/restaurant spaces. The design of these spaces has been carefully planned to provide for the greatest accessibility and value to the public, which will in turn enhance their long-term viability. 6. The proposed development creates a new destination for downtown with attributes not presently available to either residents or visitors. The impact of these new development attributes will be both immediate and positive upon commencement of use. 0 0 Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project ORIGINAL PROJECT NARRATIVE CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. E 8. \ Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed development meets all of the design and community development standards associated with these criteria. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking f formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available in order to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See the Parking Table presented at the beginning of the Project Narrative for evidence of the adequacy of the parking provided. 10. Extensive architectural efforts coupled with numerous project workshops and coordination meetings have resulted in a cooperatively produced design that fully responds to the newly adopted Downtown Design Guidelines. The architectural style and materials remain traditional at the pedestrian level and the Cleveland Street facade is consistent in scale and context in order to maintain the desired street feel. The theater entry respects the centerline and curvature of the newly designed traffic-calming node incorporated into the City's streetscape design (located at the mid-block section of Cleveland Street). This creates a main focal point and enhances the drama and excitement of the theater and retail facade, while bringing a new sense of place to downtown. Other major street facades (Osceola and Fort Harrison Streets) are designed to ensure that the scale, design, and building materials remain consistent with the guidelines; they incorporate street-fronted retail spaces, provide new streetscape and landscape improvements, and focus on pedestrian activities and parking needs. The residential tower incorporates step-backs in the facade and provides a successful transitioning from its more traditionally styled base to a more contemporary middle and top. The design and positioning of the tower's entry features and ground floor retail and restaurant spaces are in direct consideration of the planned future expansion of Coachman Park. To enhance the overall development and its attractiveness to retail and theater patrons, a public parking component has been incorporated with 560 total spaces available for them, 360 of which are to be owned and operated by the City. D AUS 2 4 2005 1 • 9 Flexible Development Application - Comprehensive Infill Project PROJECT NARRATIVE CW ACQUA AND THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA 400 Cleveland Street and related development sites ORIGINAL SIGNAGE (Division 19. SIGNS/ Section 3-1806) 1. No existing freestanding or attached signs are intended to remain in place in the proposed development. 2. A comprehensive sign program will be developed independently and will address wayfinding signage, building signage, tenant signage, monument signage, etc. The applications for the Comprehensive Sign Program will be submitted at a later date due to project size and requirements for detailed design work related to the architectural package. This item was discussed with the Planning Department in advance of the preparation of this application package. Fill Al!G 2 420 0 5 G& DF V & * r SVCS r"uif +f. y. Cl .'' LL i °_ Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: NOTE: a total of 15 sets of this application and all supporting documentation is required to be submitted in conjunction with a complete Level Two Flexible Development Application. ORIGINAL PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL USE APPLICATION (Revised 02/14/05) PLEASE TYPE OR PR1NT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: TH Management LLC MAILING ADDRESS: 400 Cleveland Street, Suite 900. Clearwater, FL 33755 PHONE NUMBER: 727.461.0794 FAX NUMBER: 727.461.0784 CELL NUMBER: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER(S): 400 Cleveland. LLC: Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC; Laura Street Development, LLC (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Mr. Mark Rieker MAILING ADDRESS: 1020 N. Orlando Avenue Suite 150, Maitland FL 32751 PHONE NUMBER: 321.206.4123 FAX NUMBER: 407.628.2105 CELL NUMBER: 321.287.5677 E-MAIL ADDRESS: mrieker(cariekerassociates.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL SIZE: 4.06 acres 176,646 sf - (acres, square feet) PLANNING & DEVELOP%'ia ,N T SVCS .,.- QTY Q .Dl.EAi WZk i HOW MANY DWELLING UNITS ARE PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? 36 HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE USED FROM THE PUBLIC AMENITIES INCENTIVE POOL? n/a IS A HEIGHT INCREASE REQUESTED? YES X NO IF YES, HEIGHT REQUESTED: Page 1 of 2 PROVIDE A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENITY TO BE PROVIDED (attach photographs, drawings, etc, as applicable): Extensive Public Amenities are included within the proposed development as follows: 245 Residential Dwelling Units 10 Screen Movie Theater (first run movies) Streetscape improvements" on Osceola Street Fort Harrison Street and Laura Street (see enclosed plans for locations) Wa)finding Plans in keeping with current downtown Clearwater standards (styles may vary slightly) 42,500 sf of downtown retail space including contiguous areas designed to support destination retail/restaurants note: all streetscape improvements are consistent in appearance and materials with City streetscape plan C. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property describ int I lication. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF ORANGE Sworn to and subscribed before me this m! day of August , A.D. 20 05 to me and/or by Mark Rieker who is personal) known has -gFedased 0, A Signature of property ewneFor representative (see enclosed "Affidavit to Authorize Agent") Notary public, My commission expires: ?• 02`l a00 Saundra Everhart Commission # DD353934 % Al!G 2 4 2005 Expires September 24, 2008 r?Fe 9onded Troy Fain • Insurance. Inc 800.385-7019 S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application.doc Page 2 of 2 i • AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and its adjacent development parcels URIUMAL 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tru c ect. operty Owner by Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner- ainstreet C velopment, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Mana Property Owner-Laura Street evelopme y Kevin Burke, Manager Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 91A 3 6 5 day of August , 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke wh having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. `\????`P?KNAPA4,, sk ,,? Notary Public My Commission Expires: .• ?gSio V 31, 2. 'Oi 2 #DD 205794 % Q ?.A t. 99' °?ayeoblicU N ??e?' pQ LJ a lJ /„/lll?„t«"? S:IPlanning DeparfinentL4pplication Formsldevelopment reviewlfiexible development comprehensive infill application 2005. c F? A LI 2 4 20({5 Svcs 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER Public Works Administration - Engineering Department FORM NUMBER 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Room 220 1311-0104 P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 VACATION REQUEST FILING FORM Na&: Responses to Items I - 9 are required. 1. NAME OF APPLICANT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: HEREBY PETITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER FOR THE VACATION OF THE FOLLOWING: ? EASEMENT TYPE: ? STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY ALLEY Phone: C/ y - 2 8G `l ORIGINAL ? OTHER: 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE VACATED: Se-e- of 1 c(dted Ddli?;i5 A For sckofc? 2Sc(iPftd?'l, p y[s AUG 2 4 2005 'LANNING & DEVELOEMc; NT SVCS 3. STREET ADDRESS OR SIMPLE LOCATION: 1100 C(eoelcrp2d 31- 4. PROPOSED USE OF VACATED PROPERTY: Axed Use- - Co0d`0VMiN/'btMS Kefa d? 5. ZONING OF ADJOINING PROPERTY: North: D South: C) East: D West: ~J Printed on recycled paper Page 1 Revised 6/24/2005 n LJ 6. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS: a. Proof of Property Ownership b. Land Survey of Property c. Site Plan showing Proposed Use of Vacated Property d. Filing Fee per Ordinance No. 5969-96: ($500.00 for a Right-of-Way/alley or $400.00 for an Easement) 7. THE FOLLOWING FOUR LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION ARE REQUIRED: a. Progress Energy b. Verizon Florida, Inc. ORIGINAL c. Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. d. Bright House 8. NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF PROPERTY OWNER (PLEASE PRINT) El Same as Applicant CSee ,t:9CL4D5FD Af:Pl DAV! r TO AC-??J Name: X11 +Q1t_ W. Rl yy-ele- _ Phone: 32.1.24% Ai S3 Address: E 3 27(05 / aOJTS 9. OWNED SIGNATU Date: A- Z4= - 05" NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of "La? , by dt., K who i personally known to me? or has produced My Commission expires: (Type of identification) ;_?` Saundra Everhart k 353 M commission # 66 ;y eo?E°res? September 24, 2008 aranee• Mc 000-066.7018 77 7 f. K AUG 2 A 2005 Name of notary typed, printed or stamped: , ?4 4.11V? ILA E ?'C- r lit r± C? as identific COP Printed on recycled paper Page 2 Revised 6/24/2005 • 0 AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC and Laura Street Development, LLC (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 400 Cleveland Street and its adjacent development parcels 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Comprehensive infill development 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: TH Management, LLC and Mark Rieker as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true Property by Kevin Burke, Manager muperry owner- amstreet c evelopment, LLC; by Kevin Burke, Man Property Owner-Laura St r Develo errt, LLC• by Kevin Burke, Manager COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 9/A ?/6 day of Au ug_st , 2005 personally appeared Kevin Burke who h ving been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: \\\\??1?11t11111t1??J / ?KNAP Fyn°// e? J Isslo •.9 Notary Public o A,v?ay 3 ,?po?,o•e %o'. #DD 205794 Publ deN? 4 2005 A FF UG icUn /C • I r STA E S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplicetion Formsldevelopment revl'Jed'1/1 W ICelopment comprehensive infr/l application 2005.d0 PLANNING & DEVF LOF `,• f avcsl Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater SECTION 16 TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH • . RANGE 15 EAST PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA - I? ? NOT TO SCALE /1 IL Q W JO ? W N 2 LAURA STREET (P+F) P.O.G. NW. Comer Lot 7 ao O J a 8882n N 88'24W W O J i I I I I I I I Do I 0' I I J I O I I I J I I I I I I? I I I cQ I I I I ?• E t100tiT I 1002r I I I i I EAf, L AND TAt'S SUBDIVISION (Pat Book H-,'.1, Page 20i) I I I I I I 04 I M I 4_1 41 J I J I CLEVELAND STREET ORIGIN?YL rAIS 2 4 2g, 15 A NG & DEVELOP& ENT ? SVGS / 10' Alley Vacation FOR: Rieker and Associates `SIAdCOAST LAIC SURVE M NC. ---------- 7 111 FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD OLDSMAR, FLORIDA 34677 BOUNDARY • TOPOGRAPHIC • CONSTRUCTION STAEOUT PH: (813) 854-1342 FAX (813) 855-6890 DWG. NO.: 506402Sketch.dw DATE DESCRIPTION BY SKETCH and DESCRIPTION NOT A SURVEY SURVEYOH'8 CERTFICATE eby certify this SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION to be the ic depiction made by me or under my direct F ROJECT NO. 506402 , vision, on the dote s) shown, which meets the iRAWING# 506402sketdt UM TECHNICAL STANDARDS set forth by the FLORIDA ;CALE N.T.S. ROOAARQ OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS and MAPPERS RAWN SHN in C opter 61G17-6, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, ATE 08/19/05 ant to Se,gU n, 12.027, FRIDA STA TES. `f KELLY 01 MCCLUNG / \ DATE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR and MAPPER l /40,912 DESCRIPTION= A portion of the 10: foot alley lying between Lots 1 & 2 and Lots 7 & 8,' of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence S00'14'53"W, along the east right-of-way line of Osceola Street, a distance of 123.67 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence S 88'29'10" E, along the southerly line of said lots 7 and 8, a distance of 100.17. feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 8; thence S 00'06'07" W, a distance of 10.17 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence N 88'24'13" W, along the northerly line of said Lots 1 and 2, a distance of 100.21 feet; thence N 00'17'34" E, along the east right-of-way of Osceola Street, a distance of 10.03 feet to the Point of Beginning. Parcel contains 1012 square feet, more or less. LEGEND NO SCALE FND FOUND R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY SCIR SET 1/2' CAPPED IRON ROD 'LB 4513' % CENTERLINE FIR FOUND IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) H Y HIGHWAY FCIR FOUND CAPPED IRON ROD (SIZE NOTED) BLVD BOULEVARD FRR FOUND RAILROAD SPIKE NO. NUMBER PK PARKER KAYLON NAIL POB POINT OF BEGINNING FCM FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SIZE NOTED) POC POINT OF COMMENCEMENT FOP FOUND OPEN-ENDED IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) D DESCRIPTION FPP ) FOUND PINCHED-TOP IRON PIPE (SIZE NOTED) F FIELD MEASURED FN&D FOUND NAIL do BRASS DISK O.R. ' ' OFFICIAL RECORDS (BOOK) SN&O LB 4513 SET NAIL IN BRASS DISC PG PAGE PLS PROFESSIONAL LAID SURVEYOR PB PLAT BOOK LB LAND SURVEYING BUSINESS P PLAT ORIGINAL 0) 1? Lo !LI A?'s?4 ?T I U 1 PLANIVI NG& DEVEi.OPP4:z:arsvC CITY OF 1. 2. 3. 4. v THIS IS A SKETCH AND. DESCRIPTION. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. BASIS OF BEARING: THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OSCEOLA STREET BEING SO0°14'53"W, ASSUMED. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR MATTERS NOT SHOWN ON THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WHICH MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND 5. REFERENCE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR DESCRIPTION. 2 • • ADDRESSES OF UTILITY COMPANIES ORIGINAL NOTE: Ask the utility companies listed below to provide you with a letter of "NO OBJECTION" for your proposed vacation request. Provide each a survey of your property showing the area of the street right-of-way, alley or easement proposed to be vacated. Be sure to submit the original signed version of the no objection letters with your vacation application. Progress Energy 2166 Palmetto Street Info: (727) 562-5751 Building "F" Fax: (727) 562-5686 f iparwntar_ FT. 11765 Contact Person Phone O eration Area Jeanne Talhouk (727) 562-3903 . Sunset Point Rd. north to Curlew Rd. west of U.S. 19 . Gulf to Bay Blvd. north to Sunset Point Rd. between Belcher Rd. and Highland Ave. . All of Clearwater Beach Rene' Martin (727) 562-5662 . S.R. 580 north to Curlew Rd. east of U.S. 19 • Sunset Point Rd. north to S.R. 580 east of Belcher Rd. . Belleair Road north to Sunset Point Rd. east of U.S. 19 Craig Kopkau (727) 562-5660 . Belleair Rd. north to Gulf to Bay Blvd. from U.S. 19 to Hi hland Ave. Verizon Florida, Inc. MC: FLCW5033 Info: (727) 562-1193 1280 E. Cleveland Street Fax: (727) 562-9614 Clearwater FT.'i'T7SG Contact Person.. Phone ` O eration Area , Vickie Sin Teton 727 562-1126 . Citywide Knology Broadband of FLSP 2144 Fax: (727) 217-2649 3001 Gandy Blvd. N. Florida, Inc. Pinellas Park_ FT. VMI Contact Person. Phone operation Area Jay Young (727) 239-0156 Office 727 235-1553 Cell . Citywide Bright House 700 Carillon Parkway Q+ P.+nrehnrn FT. '2'1719 V-AV- (7771 A'7Q-7RdS Contact Person Phone O "eration Area Scott Creasy 727 329-2817 e North of Belleair Rd. Sherelle Darroch 727 803-5061 e South of Belleair Rd. AUG 2 4 2005 ?~? Printed on recycled paper Page 3 PLAN INYADEEL PPM-ENT SVpcevised 7/12/2005 Horths e August 23, 2005 Mr. Barry Ritz Progress Energy 2166 Palmetto Street, Building' F" Clearwater, FL 33765 Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Ritz: CIVIL O LAINID PLANNING O ENVIRONMENTAL O TRANSPORTATION G ORIGINAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your imn tdiate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. Y, Housh Ghovaee, CEO 601 CLEVF&-ND k keuI-rE 930 L? U U AUG 2 4 2005 1 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@/AINDSPRiNC.COM NE5TECH@/AINDS PRiNC.COM 727 - 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 SVCt Horths e • August 23, 2005 Mr. Jay Young Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. 3001 Gandy Boulevard North Pinellas Park, FL 33782 Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Young: CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL a TRANSPORTATION ORIGINAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your immo sate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. Housh Ghovaee, CEO 601 CLEVRR-ND STIZEETe-51JITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N E5ADM1 NCN1I N D5PR1 N6.COM NESTECH©MIND5PRIN6.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 UUL ALlr 2 4 2005 SVCC Norths e • August 23, 2005 Mr. Scott Creasy Bright House 700 Carillon Parkway St. Petersburg, FL 33716 Re: Vacation Request Correction Mr. Creasy: CIVIL LAND PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION 0 ORIGINAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your immediate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. //oush;Ghovaee, , CEO IFAUG 2 4 2005 601 CLEVE llND 4&k5CJ1TE 930 PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT SVCS CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 .?.,,. ClTYOFGL AWAIER N ESAD,',11 N@MI N DS PRI NG.COM N ESTECH@M1 NDSPRI NG.COM 727 • 443.- 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 Horths e go#c0 Seu*ea 9otc. August 23, 2005 Ms. Vickie Singleton Verizon Florida, Inc. 1280 E. Cleveland Street Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Vacation Request Correction Ms. Singleton: CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION. • ORIGINAL Please be advised that the owner of real property located at Lots 1,2,7,8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of lot 18, and all of lots 19, 20, and 21, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, a subdivision according to the recorded plat thereof recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public records of Pinellas County, Florida will begin construction on the property in the very near future of a mixed use project; consisting of condominiums, restaurant, retail and a theatre on the 4.022 acre site. As part of this construction process, certain utilities must be removed and/or relocated from the site prior to construction. Please be aware that we are proposing to vacate the 10 foot alley South of Laura Street and North of Cleveland Street which runs East to West from Osceola; a portion between Lots 1 & 2, and Lots 7 & 8, of EARL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION, recorded in Plat Book H-1, Page 20 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as attached document `Exhibit B'. Furthermore, there are no recorded easement rights for any utilities that may exist in the vacated areas. Accordingly, please contact us at your earliest convenience to discuss the coordination of the removal of your utilities from the site. We are planning the immediate removal of these utilities and would like to have your input in their potential removal and/or relocation. All inquiries regarding this matter should be directed to me at Northside Engineering Services, Inc., civil engineer for this project, at (727) 443-2869. We appreciate your /imme iate attention to this matter and look forward to coordinating our efforts. rely, sh Ghovaee, CEO ? AUG z 4 ZooS 601 CLEACAND 3TRkETgITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECHQMiNDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 - 446 • 8036 'j l i 8 Dry L ' Of ..,.. _1.a??0. OF Ml Horthside CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • STORMWATER REPORT FOR: ORIGINAL CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza PROJECT L, Fir %?D. P'F'#47 31 Ram A. GloQ-.0 4 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 N ESADMI N@MI N DSPRI NG.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 - 2869 FAX 727 - 446 • 8036 August, 2005 Project No. 0543 u ? t 1 F ALM 2 4 2005 0 • 1 of 1 ORIGINAL CW Acqua (a? Downtown Plaza DRAINAGE NARRATIVE This site consists of an area of 76,646 s.f. We are proposing to remove existing impervious area of 162,500 s.f. including asphalt parking, office, bank, retail building and replace it with 245 attached residential dwellings, retail, theater, offices with parking garage. A covered underground retention vault is proposed to accommodate the required 1/2 inch water quality and discharge the over flow into the City of Clearwater Stormwater system through a 36 inch RCP to a new 54-inch RCP to be provided by the City. Drainage Calculations Water Quality Volume Required: 176,646 X 1/2X 1/12 = 7,360 c.f. Retention Vault provided= 20'x 140'x 3' deep Total Volume Provided = 8, 400 c.f. Justification for a Vault Vs Pond Site is nearly 100% impervious because of parking garage and building and hence there is no room for an open pervious pond. ly It U V l.? AUG z,20 D Z:12005 AutoCAD Projects10543 - (C. W. Acqua Downtown Plaza)ICW Acqua DRAINAGE NARRATIVE.doc1 of 1 0 0 PROJECT NAME : C.W. Acqua Downtown PROJECT NO.: 0543 ORIGINAL VAULT STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.V. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 30.50 2,800 0.064 9,800 30.00 2,800 0.064 8,400 29.50 2,800 0.064 7,000 29.00 2,800 0.064 5,600 28.50 2,800 0.064 4,200 28.50 2,800 0.064 4,200 28.00 2,800 0.064 2,8 27.50 2,800 , 0.064 1,4 d 27.00 2,800 0.064 o VAULT No. 1 WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME _ PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = ALIG 2 4 1005 176,646 SF 0.50 IN 7,360 CF 30.00 FT 8,400 CF PROJECT: PROJECT NO. NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES POND DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS C.W. ACQUA DOWNTOWN 0543 VOLUME PROVIDED = BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. _ UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. _ K= LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 8,400 C.F. 30.00 27.00 26.25 0.09 FT/MIN 75 FT 6 INCH POND AREA (SF) = POND AREA (SF) = 2,800 S.F. 2.800 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HG FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 30.00 2,800 3.13 0.75 2.75 1.14 118 12.04 2,100 174 29.25 2,800 2.38 0.75 2.75 0.86 118 9.15 2,100 229 28.50 2,800 1.63 0.75 2.75 0.59 118 6.26 2,100 335 27.75 2,800 0.88 0.75 2.75 0.32 118 3.37 2,100 623 27.00 2,800 TIME= 1,362 MINUTES TIME = 22.7 HOURS 0 AlG 2 4 20 11 ORIGINAL 0 0 gat /ep s N#pje 1/1c. Chuck Butler 701175" St. N. Pinellas Park, Fl., 33781 Ph.# (727) 544-0445 Fax # (727) 541-5027 E-mail: butlersnursery(d;msn.com chuckbutler(wtampabay.rr.com ORIGINAL Tree Inventory Aqua As required by the City of Clearwater, I have completed an assessment of all trees (8" dbh or greater) on the subject site and within 25' beyond the property lines. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability (rating of 1-5) and any potential hazards of these tr -? MAUS 242M # size/tvne rating/comments PLAir..:: a l E vi ' PVC: ;;..^ 1 15" Live Oak 3, over-pruning, mechanical damage, dead-wood in interior 2 14" Live Oak 4 3 19" Live Oak 4, Co-dominate 4 19" Live Oak 3, Co-dominate, dead branches in interior 5 13" Live Oak 3 6 40" Live Oak 5, Co-dominate 7 20" Live Oak 4, Compacted roots 8 20" Sabal Palm 4 9 13" Sabal Palm 3 10 24" Sabal Palm 3 11 12" Washin tonic palm 3 12 17" Sabal Palm 3 13 18" Eugenia 3 14 12" Ficus 4 15 28" Live Oak 3, In wires, interior dead wood, Co-dominate 16 18" Live Oak 3, Included bark, interior dead-wood 17 24" Sabal Palm 4 18 12" Sabal Palm 3 19 8" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 20 18" Sabal Palm 3 0 0 ORIGINAL 21 14" Live Oak 2, Growing in fence 22 11" Sabal Palm 3 23 15" Sabal Palm 3 24 12" Sabal Palm 3 25 9" Sabal Palm 3 26 18" Sabal Palm 4 27 10,15 Laurel Oak 4, Co-dominate 28 8" Queen Palm 2, Almost dead 29 23" Sabal Palm 3 30 18" Live Oak 4, Included bark, some dead-wood 31 18" Orchid 3, Interior decay 32 8" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 33 9" Queen Palm 3, Mechanical damage 34 8" Black Pine 3, Machanical damage 35 15" Live Oak 4, Minor dead-wood I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Sincerely, Chuck Butler, Certified Arborist, Certificate #FL-1235A D AUS 2 4 205 '1 PLANNING & DEVELO; NIO T SVCS Gull OF i WL3 t ,?Q.f yt?.Ii acv.- . - ? •t? < ` QQ 14 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW October 26, 2006 Mr. Mark Rieker Rieker & Associates, Inc. 1020 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 150 Maitland, Florida 32751 CI'T'Y OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT PosT OFFU:E Box 4748, CLEARWA"I'F.R, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR"TLE AVENUE, CLF.ARWAT'ER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street (CW Acqua) Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Rieker: On November 15, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above referenced Flexible Development application to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit must be initiated within one year from the date of CDB approval (by November 15, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On October 25, 2006, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to initiate a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I hereby APPROVE a one-year time extension of the original Development Order to November 15, 2007, to initiate an application for a building permit to construct those improvements on your parcel of land at 400 Cleveland Street as previously approved by the CDB with same conditions of approval attached. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such an extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the PRANK 1111MARD, ?IMAYOk JUIIN Dm'\N, CcHINY:ll.,mrNi :1, I Ic)-1 IIA.\1111 IN, CU1? NCILMEMBI:R BILLJONSON, COHNCILAIb:;WSI[R ® Gwi.icN A. Prri:RS1;N, Cut Ncai..\rn..\m1:R "EQUAL EIMPLOY,MENT AND Ar•r•IRNIAT1W Ac I'm EMPLO) ER" October 27, 2006 FLD2005-08084 (400 Cleveland Street) Page 2 of 2 original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.tefft@pMclearwater.com. Sincerely, 3 c? ? Michael Delk, AIC Planning Director S: IPlanning Department I C D BI FLEX (FLD) Ilnactive or Finished Applications I Cleveland Street 0400 Acqua (D) Approved l Cleveland Street 400 - Development Order Extension 10-26-06.doc r • Commercial & Institutional Development Management Construction Services Project Management October 25, 2006 Mr. Robert Teflt Planner III CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33758 Re: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street (CW Acqua) Request for One Year Extension Dear Robert, This letter is being sent to request a one year extension to the approvals for the above project, which is presently set to expire on November 15, 2006. Our project team has continued to work diligently on the design, pricing, logistics and coordination of the project over the past 11 months, however due to the size and complexity of the project, additional time will be necessary for the work leading up to the building permitting process. We have received excellent assistance from the City in our meetings with the planning department, public works, engineering and the building department, and we look forward to continuing that positive relationship as we move closer toward construction and completion of the project Should you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, RIEKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Rieker President Encl. Cc: Rod Irwin, Assistant City Manager Michael Delk, Planning Director Elias JaJX Clearwater Development; LLC John O. Graham, MLG Kevin Burke, Wiseman & Burke Rhea Law, Fowler White Mary Repper Commercial DevelopmenUConstrucliordPrcje Management Services 1020 N. Orlando Ave., Suite 150, Maitland, FL 32751 ph: 321.206.3399 fax: 407.628.2105 r -jet py' 64Q1 LONG RANGr PLANNING DFVFLOPMENT Rrv1EW October 24, 2006 Mr. Mark Rieker 1020 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 150 Maitland, Florida 32751 CI'TE' OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr OITICE Box 4748, CLFARWATFR, FI.ORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SI:RVICIis BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTI-r AVENUE:, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 Tlil-r•-PHONr (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: Notification of Expiration of Development Order - FLD2005-08084 (400 Cleveland Street) Dear Mr. Rieker: This is a courtesy notice that the approvals under the above referenced Development Order for case number FLD2005-08084 will expire and become null and void unless an application for a building permit is made prior to Wednesday, November 15, 2006. This is the only notice you will receive regarding the expiration of the above referenced case. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 Email: robert.tefft(&ntyclear•water.cona FRANK I11BBARD, MAYOR JcrnN nORAN, COUNcn:w au+rR I IOVI- 11AN111:1 ON, COI N(7LAi1:.\IRfR 1311.1. Imso-", Cc,uNC:n..?utansi•:IZ ® C:u;L1:N r\. PI:-1 1:1,,S1;,\,, Cot "EQUAL ENIPLOY,MFNT ANI) Arr1R,\1A'1,V1: Ac:l ION EAIPi.M ER" 0 :.Sa?QT ,?"??,OrO LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW November 16, 2005 Mr. Mark Rieker C I'I'I' O F C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Rieker & Associates, Inc. 1020 North Orlando Avenue, Suite 150 Maitland, FL 32751 Re: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street (CW Acqua and the Downtown Plaza) Dear Mr. Rieker: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On November 15, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. The CDB APPROVED the application, based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 4.05-acres subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the Downtown Core character district; 3. That the development proposal includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking as part of a separate development agreement; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; That the proposed use of 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C; 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913; and BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRtWK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HoYf HAMIL"I.ON, COLINCIUMEMBrR BILL JONSON, COUNCILME;NIBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COLINCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFPIRD'LATIVE ACl'ION EMPLOYER" i The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of 'the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 23, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft@Myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michae De AICP Planning Director S. (Planning Departmentl C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications)Cleveland 400 - Acqua (D) - ApprovedlCleveland Street 400 - Development Order.doc 8. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all nonresidential uses proposed to be located on site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the storefront windows are revised to consist of bulkheads and transoms to be consistent with the architectural style and the City's Downtown Design Guidelines; 12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 15, 2006); 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within three years of issuance of the first building permit; 14. That all improvements be constructed in a single phase, or alternatively that the southern building (theatre) and requisite parking, including any and all public parking, along with any streetscaping adjacent thereto, be constructed as the first phase of the development. The streetscape may also be accomplished via a separate agreement with the City; 15. That the recladding of the office building shall be commenced no later that the issuance of certificates of occupancy for 85% of the residential condominium units and shall be substantially complete within 24 months thereafter; and 16. That any dwelling units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not built shall be returned to the Pool. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by November 15, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within three years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. i r CDB Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 **REVISED ** Case Number: FLD2005-08084 Agenda Item: D. 4. Owners: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC; and Laura Street Development, LLC Applicant: TH Management, LLC Agent: Mark Rieker Addresses: 400, 410, 418 and 420 Cleveland Street and 416 Laura Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. EXISTING ZONING / Downtown (D) District. LAND USE: Central Business District (CBD) Category. CLEARWATER Downtown Core DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Retail and Office. Proposed Use: Mixed-use (245 attached dwelling units and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area). ADJACENT ZONING / North: Downtown (D) District - Office. LAND USE: South: Downtown (D) District - Retail, Office and Restaurant. East: Downtown (D) District - Retail, Office and Restaurant. West: Downtown (D) District - Retail and Convention Center. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 4.05-acre subject property comprises the majority of the block formed by Cleveland Street on the south, North Fort Harrison Avenue on the east, Osceola Avenue on the west, and is approximately 200 feet south of Drew Street. The property is within the Downtown (D) District and the Downtown Core character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The subject property consists of several existing structures including the 87,800 square foot AmSouth building that is located at the Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 1 • • northeast corner of Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue. Additionally, approximately one-third of the subject property consists of paved parking. The surrounding area consists of a variety of uses including: retail sales and services, business and professional offices and restaurants. Development Proposal: The development proposal will retain the existing 87,800 square foot AmSouth building while the balance of the existing improvements on the subject property will be demolished. The demolished improvements will be replaced with 245 attached dwelling units, 35,000 square feet of retail floor area, 8,500 square feet of restaurant floor area, a ten-screen movie theatre showing first-run movies, and a 1,213 space parking garage. It is noted that within the parking garage, the City, by way of a separate development agreement, will control 360 of the proposed parking spaces for use as public parking. The development consists of two components. One component is located at the northeast corner of Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, and consists of a proposed 65-foot tall building (to roof deck) containing the movie theatre and a portion of the overall retail floor area. This component also includes the provision of architectural improvements to the existing 100-foot tall AmSouth building. The second component is located at the northeast corner of Laura Street and Osceola Avenue, and consists of a proposed 380-foot tall building (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments. This component contains all of the attached dwelling units, the restaurant floor area, the balance of the retail floor area, and the parking garage. Floor Area Ratio: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the Floor Area Ratio for properties located within the Downtown Core character district is 4.0. The development proposal consists of a total of 186,300 square feet of nonresidential floor area, thereby leaving 2.98 acres to calculate the allowable residential density. Density: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable density for attached dwellings within the Downtown Core character district is 70 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, based upon the above with regard to the Floor Area Ratio, the remaining 2.98 acres of the subject property would permit a maximum of 209 attached dwelling units. However, the development proposal consists of 245 attached dwelling units - 36 dwelling units more than is allowable. As such, the applicant has requested the use of 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool as made available by the Plan. The development proposal's compliance with the requirements for this additional density from the Pool is discussed later in the staff report. Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-903, the maximum allowable height within the Downtown (D) District is 100 feet. However, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan allows for those properties within the Downtown Core character district to have no maximum height restriction. As previously referenced, the development proposal consists both a north and a south component. The proposed height of the southern component is 65 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 13 feet for architectural embellishments, and the proposed height of the northern component is 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments. It is noted that with regard to the southern component, the proposed height does not include the existing 100-foot AmSouth building that is to remain as part of this development proposal. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan with regard to height. Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-903, parking is required to be provided at a rate of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit for attached dwellings, three parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for office, four parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for retail sales and service, and 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for restaurants. At the above ratios, the Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 2 • 0 proposed 245 attached dwellings (367.5), 87,800 square feet of office floor area (263.4), 90,000 square feet of retail sales and service floor area (360) and 8,500 square feet of restaurant floor area (127.5) requires a total of 1,119 parking spaces. Pursuant to Section 3-1405, when any land, building or area is used for two or more uses that are listed in the shared parking table, the minimum number of required parking spaces shall be determined by multiplying the individual minimum parking requirements by the appropriate percentages listed in the table. The following table depicts the development proposals parking requirement as per the shared parking table: WEEKDAY WEE KEND Use: Midnight 6 A.M. 9 A.M. 4 P.M. 6 P.M. Midnight 9 A.M. 4 P.M. 6 P.M Midnight Residential 367.5 100% = 367.5 60% = 220.5 90% = 330.75 80% = 294 90% = 330.75 Office 263.4 5% = 13.17 100% = 263.4 10% = 26.34 10% = 26.34 5% = 13.17 Restaurant 127.5 10% = 12.75 50% = 63.75 100% = 127.5 50% = 63.75 100% = 127.5 Retail (360)* 5%= 18 70% = 252 90% = 324 100% = 360 70% = 252 Totals: 411.42 799.65 808.59 744.09 723.42 * The Retail category includes both the retail and the movie theatre parking requirements. Based upon the above, the development proposal requires a minimum of 809 parking spaces. As proposed, a total of 1,213 parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal exceeds its parking requirement. It is noted that of the 404 excess parking spaces, 360 will control by the City for public parking as part of a separate development agreement. Solid Waste: The components of the development proposal each include a service area accessed from Laura Street. The service area for the northern portion of the development includes a recycling holding area and a trash compactor, while the southern portion includes only the trash compactor. The proposed solid waste facilities have been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Signage: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Utilities: All on-site utility facilities (i.e. electric and telecommunication lines) are required to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Provisions for the future undergrounding of existing aboveground utility facilities in the. public right-of-way must be completed.prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and the City. Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that a key component to diversify the Downtown Core is to attract residential uses with a variety of housing types and prices with retail, restaurant and services to follow. The Plan further states that the Downtown Core shall have the highest density for residential uses and the highest intensity for retail, commercial and office uses. Public Amenities Incentive Pool: To assist in the transformation of downtown Clearwater into a quality place in which to live, work and play, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes a Public Amenities Incentive Pool of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non- residential uses. The applicant is proposing the use of 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. The amenities provided by this development in order to justify the request from the Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 3 i • Public Amenities Incentive Pool include the provision of 245 dwelling units (including those requested from the Pool) in the Downtown Core, the construction of 360 City controlled public parking on-site and streetscape improvements on Osceola Avenue, Fort Harrison Avenue and Laura Street consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the provision of these amenities, which are consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the request for 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool can be supported. Downtown Design Guidelines: As previously discussed, the development proposal consists of separate northern and southern components. The southern component, which has frontage along Cleveland Street, is respectful of the historic building, height and scale patterns along the right-of-way and has a proposed height of 65 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 13 feet for architectural embellishments. The ground level of the northern component consists of both nonresidential floor area and a parking garage. The second through seventh levels will also consist of parking garage floor area, while the balance of the structure consists of a residential tower with a proposed height of 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments. The architecture of the two components is consistent with one another and consists of architectural pre- cast panels of varying appearances throughout the entirety of the southern component and along the base and mid-section of the northern component with aluminum and glass window systems, decorative screening, and aluminum and fabric awnings. The tower section of the northern component is constructed of aluminum and glass window systems with architectural pre-cast cornices and an aluminum clad roof feature. It is noted that the tower is not solely comprised of aluminum and glass window systems, but also includes pre-cast panels providing framing to some elements of the building and comprising a large section of the tower's east elevation. The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with regard to various elements associated with new construction in the Downtown. A review of these guidelines within the Plan was conducted and the following applicable items were identified: Block and Lot Characteristics: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the existing street grid pattern shall be retained where it contributes to an active pedestrian environment, and that blocks should be designed to promote easy pedestrian access and encourage cross-use. The development proposal consists of two components with one on either side of the Laura Street right-of-way and proposes to include a covered walkway across Laura Street between the two portions. As the development proposal includes the retention of Laura Street as part of the street grid pattern and does not propose to vacate the right-of-way in order to provide one contiguous development and includes a pedestrian connection between the two halves, the project is consistent with the above guidelines. Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the location, number and design of driveways shall maintain the urban fabric of the downtown; and that interior lot access shall be limited to the minimum number of curb cuts to adequately serve the site. The development proposal consists of one curb cut along Fort Harrison Avenue, two curb cuts on Laura Street and three curb cuts on Osceola Avenue. There are no curb cuts on Cleveland Street, which is in accordance with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The proposed curb cut on Fort Harrison Avenue is for ingress/egress to the nonresidential/public parking portion of the parking garage, while the curb cuts along Laura Street provide access to the service/loading areas for both components of the development, and the curb cuts on Osceola Avenue provide ingress/egress to the residential portion of the parking garage and for a circular drive at the front of the restaurant and residential tower lobby. Based upon the scale of the development and the nature/purpose of the proposed curb cuts, the number is adequate to serve the site and consistent with the fabric of the downtown. Further, the location and Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 4 • i design of the curb cuts will also maintain the urban fabric of the downtown and are also consistent with the manner in which curb cuts have been previously approved in the downtown. The Downtown Design Guidelines further state that parking lots shall be located behind the primary fagade of the principal building, and that interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials shall be used for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. The parking garage associated with the development is located behind nonresidential floor area on those facades adjacent to Osceola Avenue and Laura Street, and behind a faux storefront fagade along Fort Harrison Avenue designed for consistency with the balance of the architectural elevations. The parking garage ingress/egress driveways on Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues as well as the circular driveway on Osceola Avenue and the western half of the Laura Street right-of-way will be constructed or reconstructed with interlocking pavers. In addition to the above, the Downtown Design Guidelines state that parking garages accessory to a principal use shall be architecturally integrated with the design, materials, finish and color of the principal structure, and that the upper floors of all parking garages shall be designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. The development proposal provides a consistent architectural treatment across all of the building facades; thus the parking garage fagade blends seamlessly with the balance of the building facades. With regard to screening vehicles within the upper levels of the parking garage from view, the exterior walls have been designed as architectural pre-cast panels with openings for natural ventilation; however the openings are covered with a decorative grillwork which will visually screen the parking function while providing visual interest to the building fagade. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above Guidelines regarding vehicular circulation/access and parking. Pedestrian Circulation/Access: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways should be provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. The development proposal includes the provision of a ten-foot wide pedestrian pathway at the north end of the site with plantings abutting the adjacent building foundation. The pedestrian pathway will connect Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues. Site Elements: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that open spaces should be provided which function as transitions between the public sidewalks and streets and the use of the property and that these open spaces shall be visible and inviting to the pedestrian. The Design Guidelines also states "the type and character of the open space should be influenced by the desired function of the space, surrounding uses and the potential users of the space". The development proposal contains three distinct open spaces. One of these open spaces consists of the area adjacent to the circular drive at Osceola Avenue. The other two open spaces are located at the northeast and southeast corners of Osceola Avenue and Laura Street. Each of these open spaces includes areas for an outdoor cafe or is to be associated with a proposed restaurant space. The design of these spaces is such that they are inviting to the prospective user either enticing them to sit as they walk along the sidewalk or draw them into the building/tenant space. As such, the development proposal has provided open spaces in a manner suggested by the Downtown Design Guidelines. Buffering and Screeniniz: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. The development proposal locates the necessary service/loading facilities off Laura Street away from the majority of the storefronts and main pedestrian linkages. The majority of the mechanical equipment for the northern building will be located within the building on its seventh and eight floors, with additional equipment located within a mechanical core atop the tower and screened by an 27-foot high aluminum clad roof feature. The mechanical equipment serving the southern building will be located within two hubs atop Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 5 • • the building. The equipment will be located behind screens and set back 20 feet from Laura Street, 40 feet from Cleveland Street and 48 feet from Osceola Avenue. With regard to wireless communication facilities, it has been attached as a condition of approval that any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition of approval, the development proposal complies with above applicable Guidelines. Coverage: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that it is appropriate to locate building farther from a build-to line in order to provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian oriented design features maintaining the build-to line. Further, the Downtown Design Guidelines state that it may be appropriate to provide separation between buildings to create adequate usable space such as an alley or open space compliant with these Guidelines. The majority of the proposed building is placed directly adjacent to the subject property lines; however portions of the building have been set back from the property line in order to accommodate open spaces for outdoor seating and pedestrian interaction. In addition, and as previously stated, the development proposal includes the provision of a ten-foot wide landscaped pathway at the north end of the site providing a pedestrian connection between Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with the above applicable Guidelines. Scale and Height: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the size and proportions of new development should be related to the scale of nearby buildings. Even if much larger than its neighbors in terms of square footage, the building should maintain the same scale and rhythm as the existing buildings. In addition, the Guidelines state that the apparent height of a building/development can be influenced and augmented by a combination of step backs, varying building heights and horizontal features. With regard to the northern building, the first seven levels have a height (83 feet) that is similar to that of neighboring buildings, such as the Clearwater Main Library (86 feet) and existing AmSouth building (100 feet). The upper portion of the building, or the tower portion, is set at an angle to the lower levels resulting in a building step back that increases from approximately two feet to 104 feet from north to south along Osceola Avenue. The angle/orientation of the tower also results in a step back from the property line abutting the Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way of approximately 130 feet. Additionally, there are other developments in the surrounding vicinity that are being proposed or that have been approved by the Board with similar heights. The Water's Edge development, which is located at the southwest corner of Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, was approved by the Board with a height of 271 feet, and the Clearwater Bay Club, which is located immediately to the north of the subject development proposal, is being proposed with a height of approximately 260 feet. It is further noted that no height limitation is imposed on development within the Downtown Core character district. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Rhythm/Spacing The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". Further, the Guidelines state that with regard to high-rise buildings the building levels or step backs should be differentiated by architectural features such as coping, cornice lines and material changes; and that there should be a proportional relationship between the height of a building and the number and dimensions of step backs used to mitigate the height of the building. The south building and the lower portion of the north building each have a corresponding and distinct "base", "middle" and "cap" that is identified by material changes, cornice lines and coping. Further, the tower portion of the building also has its own distinct "base", "middle" and "cap" with the "cap" being the upper four levels of the tower, which are stepped back from the "middle". In turn, the "middle" is differentiated from the "base" by a distinct cornice line and material change at the fifth level of the tower. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 6 The proposed height of the building (380 feet to roof deck) is adjudged to be proportional to the dimensions of the step back being provided to mitigate the height. As previously discussed, the upper portion of the building, or the tower portion, is set at an angle to the lower levels resulting in a building step back that increases from approximately two feet to 104 feet from north to south along Osceola Avenue. The angle/orientation of the tower also results in a step back from the property line abutting the Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way of approximately 130 feet. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Additional Requirements for Downtown Core alone Cleveland Street: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings along Cleveland Street taller than the predominant height of other buildings on the project's block should step back at that predominant height. With regard to the subject block, the development proposal will encompass all but one building along Cleveland Street (not including the AmSouth building which will remain as part of this development proposal, but be architecturally modified); thus this development will create the new predominant height for the block. However, the development proposal will still provide a step back at the height of the existing building to remain along Cleveland Street. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Architecture: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that new development shall complement the architectural heritage of the district in which it is located; however new buildings may use a variety of architectural styles as appropriate to the intended use of the building. The Guidelines state further that multiple buildings within a single project shall architecturally relate to each other and the surrounding neighborhood. There are two distinct architectural styles to the development proposal; the "base" of the development (i.e. the lower seven levels) has a more traditional style of architecture that closely resembles and is complimentary to the heritage of the district. The architecture of the tower portion is a more contemporary style, but it is a more appropriate style for the intended use of the tower as residences. The "base" (levels one through seven) and tower portions of the building each consist of architectural pre-cast panels, which serve to tie the two portions together while being consistent with the differing architectural styles of the two portions. Additionally, the two halves of the development are architecturally consistent with one another, and the existing AmSouth building will be blended seamlessly with the balance of the southern half of the project. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Primary and Corner Facades: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the primary fagades shall be the most highly designed fagades and utilize plane changes (i.e. projections and recesses), architectural details, variety in color, material and textures, and storefront display windows for retail uses. Further, the Guidelines state that buildings on corner lots shall emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. The development proposal consists of several primary fagades each of which have been given similar highly designed fagades that include projections, recesses, numerous windows of varying styles and sizes, storefront display windows for proposed retail uses, multiple cornice lines, varying roof heights and material changes. The existing AmSouth building is located at the corner of Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue.. This existing building measures approximately 100 feet (to roof deck), while the proposed building making up the balance of this half of the development has a height of 65 feet (to roof deck); thus the building's prominent location will continue to be emphasized with this redevelopment. As for the northern portion of the development, the building's prominent location at the corner of Osceola Avenue and Laura Street is emphasized by the design of the proposed restaurant space, which will feature a curved exterior wall with an outdoor seating area located directly at the corner. This design will result in an open space that Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 7 0 0 will be a distinguishing architectural feature for the development. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Windows and Doors: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that it is inappropriate for new development to utilize mirrored glass and glass curtain walls. Further, the Guidelines state that storefront display windows should contain both bulkheads and transoms when appropriate to the architectural style of the building. The architectural elevations of the tower, while comprised mostly of glass, do not consist of mirrored glass or glass curtain walls. The glass panes in the tower elevations are framed in aluminum with these sections broken-up vertically by architectural pre-cast panels and cornices. Further, the northern end of the tower actually has very little glass with the exception of standard window openings, as it is also comprised of an architectural pre-cast panel. As proposed, it does not appear that the bulkheads and transoms deemed appropriate by the Downtown Design Guidelines have been provided for all of the storefronts. These elements would certainly be consistent with the architectural style of the buildings, and it is therefore attached as a condition of approval that the storefront windows are revised to include both bulkheads and transoms in a manner consistent with the architectural style. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Roof Desijn: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that large buildings shall have multiple rooftops on varying levels that helps break up the vertical mass of the building. The proposed architectural elevations consist of several varying rooflines particularly along that portion of the southern building fronting on Cleveland Street where eight differing rooflines are proposed. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Other Architectural Features: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that shutters and canvas awnings that are sized to match to corresponding window openings should be provided. The development proposal includes the provision of three different styles/appearances of awning along the various commercial storefronts and entrances to the development. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Materials: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that building materials shall be consistent with and relate to the architectural style of the building. The Guidelines also state that the storefront level and upper levels should use visually compatible materials. The nonresidential components of the building (i.e. the lower seven levels) have a more traditional style of architecture that is complimentary to the heritage of the district, and the materials of which these areas are constructed convey this. The lower levels are constructed with architectural pre-cast panels, which the Downtown Design Guidelines states as appropriate for "the first three floors of all buildings and recommended for all other floors. " These pre-cast panels have been designed to resemble various forms of masonry exteriors, which is consistent with traditional retail storefronts. The upper levels of the development (i.e. the tower) are of a more contemporary style and the proposed aluminum, glass, and architectural pre-cast panels are representative of this. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Color: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the number and type of building colors should be appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. The color scheme for the development proposal consists of browns and dark tans for the lower levels of the buildings along with tans for the upper levels of the buildings. The cornices and vertical architectural pre-cast panels within the tower will be off-white, while two different storefront fabric awnings will be provided with one being blue and the other a pattern bronze. The proposed color scheme is consistent with and appropriate for the Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 8 • • architectural style of the buildings. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Additional Requirements for Development Along, Cleveland Street Between Myrtle and Osceola Avenues and Along Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew and Chestnut Streets: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that development shall incorporate an architectural style indicative of those found in downtown Clearwater between circa 1900 and 1950, such as: 201h Century Commercial Vernacular, Art- Deco, Art Moderne, Chicago School, Mediterranean/Mission Influence, or Neo-Classical. The architecture of the lower portions (first seven levels) of the buildings incorporates aspects of the 20th Century Commercial Vernacular, Art Moderne and Chicago School architectural styles, while the upper levels (the tower) is indicative of the Art Moderne architectural style. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the following applicable Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified: ? Vision: Downtown Clearwater is a major center of activity, business and governments. The development proposal includes the provision of 245 dwelling units and 98,500 square feet of new retail and restaurant floor area in the Downtown in addition to the 87,800 square feet of existing office floor area that is being assimilated into the project. The development proposal also includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking spaces within the projects associated parking garage. As such, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Cleveland Street is downtown's "main street" and is valued both for its historic character/setting and as the major retail street. The historic character of Cleveland Street will not be negatively impacted by the development proposal in that the project is respectful of the historic building, height and scale patterns along Cleveland Street. Further, the development proposal will locate 245 dwelling units downtown and a 10-screen movie theatre fronting directly on Cleveland Street the provision of which will result in increased pedestrian activity downtown and the strengthening of the retail environment. As such, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. The development proposal provides the mix of uses envisioned with the above statement. Specifically, the project provides 245 dwelling units, 87,800 square feet of office floor area, 90,000 square feet of retail sales and service floor area and 8,500 square feet of restaurant floor area. The project includes a 10-screen movie theatre as part of the retail and service floor area, which will provide the recreational opportunity to the Downtown as specified by the Vision statement. Based upon the above, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues should be redeveloped as pedestrian oriented streets and in conjunction with Cleveland Street form the major retail core of Downtown. The subject property has a substantial amount of frontage along both Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, and the development proposal includes the provision of 98,500 square feet of new retail and restaurant floor area along these rights-of-way. The building facades have been designed at a pedestrian scale with large storefronts covered by aluminum and fabric awnings. As such, the development proposal will provide pedestrian oriented streets and enhance the retail core of Downtown; thus the project will further this Vision statement. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 9 • • ? Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The development proposal incorporates classical proportions of traditional architecture as well as elements of more contemporary design. The primary fagades of the development consist of storefronts designed at a human scale with those levels immediately above designed in a complementary fashion. The residential tower, as previously stated, has a more contemporary design while still incorporating some architectural characteristics of the lower levels. The development's lower levels and the tower have both been designed with a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap" in keeping with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Further, the tower component has been steps back substantially from both Osceola and Fort Harrison Avenues based upon its orientation to the lower levels of the development. Based upon the above, the development proposal will be consistent with the Vision statement. ? Vision: An adequate parking supply must be available coterminous with new uses. As previously discussed under the Off-Street Parking analysis, the development proposal requires a minimum of 898 parking spaces as per the shared parking table [ref.: Section 3-1405] and will provide a total of 1,213 parking spaces within the on-site parking garage. It is noted that 360 of the proposed 1,213 parking spaces will be control by the City for public parking as part of a separate development agreement. Thus, the development proposal exceeds the requirements of code and is consistent with this Vision statement. ? Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. The development proposal consists of the provision of 245 dwelling units and 98,500 square feet of new retail (including a 10-screen movie theatre) and restaurant floor area within the Downtown Core. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Goal. ? Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the Downtown Design Guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The development proposal will provide for 245 attached dwellings and 186,300 square feet of new and existing non-residential floor area as part of an attractive mixed- use development. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ? Objective 1F: Cleveland Street shall be maintained as Downtown's main street, which is valued both for both its historic character and scale of development and for its function as the major retail street. The historic character of Cleveland Street will not be negatively impacted by the development proposal in that the project is respectful of the historic building, height and scale patterns along Cleveland Street and contains the 201h Century Commercial Vernacular, Art Moderne and Chicago School architectural styles that are deemed appropriate by the Downtown Design Guidelines. Further, the development proposal will locate 245 dwelling units within the downtown area as well as a 10-screen movie theatre that will front directly on Cleveland Street. The provision of these elements will result in increased pedestrian activity downtown and the strengthening of the retail environment. As such, the development proposal will further this Objective. ? Objective 11: The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provides for a Public Amenities Incentive Pool from which development proposals may acquire additional dwelling units in excess of what the applicable density restrictions would otherwise allow. This development proposal includes a request to utilize 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 -Page 10 • • ? Objective 21: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes the provision of streetscape improvements along Cleveland Street, Osceola Avenue and Fort Harrison Avenue that are consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan; thus compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ? Policy 1: The Downtown Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. As previously discussed, the development proposal is consistent with the various aspects of the Downtown Design Guidelines including, but not limited to: Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking, Scale and Height, Rhythm/Spacing, Architecture, Primary and Corner Fagades, Windows and Doors, Materials and Color. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. As discussed later in this staff report, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The architectural elevations of the proposed buildings have been designed with an emphasis on pedestrian scale development. The fagades include functional storefronts on Cleveland Street, Laura Street and Osceola Avenue as well as decorative faux storefronts along Fort Harrison Avenue. However, each of the storefront facades includes aluminum and glass window systems, and aluminum and fabric awnings. The pedestrian environment will also be improved through the provision of 98,500 square feet of new retail and restaurant floor area, and 245 new attached dwelling units as well as streetscape improvements along each of the abutting rights-of-way that are consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. ? Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development proposal will utilize 36 dwelling units from the Pool. The amenities provided by this development to justify the request include the provision of 245 residential units (including those from the Pool) in the Downtown Core, the construction of 360 City controlled public parking spaces within the development proposal's associated parking garage, and streetscape improvements on Osceola Avenue, Fort Harrison Avenue and Laura Street consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the above, compliance with this Policy has been achieved. ? Policy 12: Drive-thru facilities shall only be permitted as an accessory use and through a design that minimizes the views of the facility from rights-of-way and preserves the urban character of Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 11 • • Downtown. The development proposal will result in the elimination of a drive-thru facility that is not consistent with the above policy. As such, the project will further this Policy within the Downtown. ? Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. The development proposal will provide several amenities for the residents, including: a fitness center, two swimming pools, two clubhouses, paddle courts, and a playground. Based upon the above, the development proposal has provided sufficient amenities for the scale of the project and is consistent with the above Policy. ? Policy 20: Shared parking for commercial, office and mixed uses should be accomplished wherever possible. The development proposal makes use of the shared parking table [ref.: Section 3-1405] for the proposed residential, office, restaurant and retail uses. As such, the project is consistent with the above Policy. ? Policy 23: The City shall evaluate the need, size and location for a parking garage(s) to support entertainment, retail and/or restaurant uses. The City may support the development of these uses through the construction of a garage, participation in a public/private partnership to build a garage or contributions to assist in the construction of a garage. As previously noted, the development proposal includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking spaces within the parking garage associated with the project. These parking spaces will be owned and operated by the City; therefore the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. Downtown Core District Policies: The following applicable policies shall govern development within the District, as well as City actions: ? Priority shall be given to the construction of a garage(s) in support of the implementation of the Coachman Park Master Plan. The garage(s) shall be located to provide convenient access for park, library and marina users. As previously discussed, the development proposal includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking spaces within the parking garage associated with the project. The location of the parking garage will provide the convenient access sought by this Policy to Coachman Park and the library. ? To ensure a pedestrian friendly and safe environment, driveways shall be discouraged on Cleveland Street between Myrtle Avenue and Osceola Avenue. The development proposal is consistent with this Policy as no driveways are proposed on Cleveland Street. ? Redevelopment and new construction along Cleveland Street shall be compatible with and contribute to pedestrian vitality, human scale and historic fabric. The historic character of Cleveland Street will not be negatively impacted by the development proposal in that the project is respectful of the historic building, height and scale patterns along Cleveland Street. Further, the development proposal will locate 245 dwelling units within the downtown area as well as a 10-screen movie theatre that will front directly on Cleveland Street. The provision of these elements will result in increased pedestrian activity downtown and the strengthening of the retail environment. As such, the development proposal will further this Policy. Based upon the above, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 12 • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the standards and criteria as per Section 2-903 and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 70 dwelling units per acre 82.04 dwelling units per acre X* (209 dwelling units) (245 dwelling units) Floor Area 4.0 4.0 X Ratio Height 30 feet 380 feet X** Parking Spaces Attached 1.5 spaces per unit 1,213 parking spaces X*** Dwellings (367.5 spaces) Office 3 / 1,000 square feet GFA (263.4 spaces) Restaurant 15 / 1,000 square feet GFA (127.5 spaces) Retail 4 / 1,000 square feet GFA 360 spaces) * It is noted that the figures with regard to Density are based upon the acreage of the site following Floor Area Ratio calculations. See above discussion regarding Densityfor further information. ** See above discussion regarding Height. *** See above discussion regarding Off-Street Parking. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.C.: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development X is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project X creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District Design X Guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 13 COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the General Applicability Standards as per Section 3-913: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, X bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and X use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of X the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. COMPLIANCE WITH DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the Downtown Design Guidelines as per the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Site Design: Blocks and Lot Characteristics X 2. Site Design: Access, Circulation and Parking X 3. Site Design: Site Elements X 4. Building Placement: Location X 5. Building Placement: Orientation X 6. Building Placement: Separation X 7. Building Placement: Building Coverage X 8. Building Placement: Additional Requirements for Character Districts and X Special Areas 9. Building Design: Form X 10. Building Design: Architecture X 11. Signs N/A N/A 12. Lighting N/A N/A 13. Property Maintenance N/A N/A 14. Pinellas Trail N/A N/A 15. Utility/Infrastructure Facilities N/A N/A 16. Corporate Design N/A N/A SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 29, 2005. The applicant has worked with Staff over the past year to provide an attractive, well-designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will further the City's goals of improving the character of the area and promoting private sector investment within the Downtown. Further, the development proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, General Applicability Standards, as well as the Downtown Design Guidelines. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 -Page 14 • • The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C., based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law with the following conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 4.05-acres subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the Downtown Core character district; 3. That the development proposal includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking as part of a separate development agreement; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; That the proposed use of 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C; 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3- 913; and 8. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all nonresidential uses proposed to be located on site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 15 0 0 a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the storefront windows are revised to consist of bulkheads and transoms to be consistent with the architectural style and the City's Downtown Design Guidelines; 12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 15, 2006); 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within three years of issuance of the first building permit; 14. That all improvements be constructed in a single phase, or alternatively that the southern building (theatre) and requisite parking, including any and all public parking, along with any streetscaping adjacent thereto, be constructed as the first phase of the development. The streetscape may also be accomplished via a separate agreement with the City; 15. That the recladding of the office building shall be commenced no later that the issuance of certificates of occupancy for 85% of the residential condominium units and shall be substantially complete within 24 months thereafter; and 16. That any dwelling units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not built shall be returned to the Pool. Prepared by Planning Department Staff- Robert Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Application Location Map Aerial Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Photographs of Site and Vicinity S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBICIeveland 400 - Acqua (D) -11-15-05(RT)ICleveland Street 400 - Staff Report I1-15-05.doc Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 16 CDB Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 E Case Number: FLD2005-08084 Agenda Item: D. 4. Owners: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC; and Laura Street Development, LLC Applicant: TH Management, LLC Agent: Mark Rieker Addresses: 400, 410, 418 and 420 Cleveland Street and 416 Laura Street CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. EXISTING ZONING / Downtown (D) District. LAND USE: Central Business District (CBD) Category. CLEARWATER Downtown Core DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CHARACTER DISTRICT: PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Retail and Office. Proposed Use: Mixed-use (245 attached dwelling units and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area). ADJACENT ZONING / North: Downtown (D) District - Office. LAND USE: South: Downtown (D) District - Retail, Office and Restaurant. East: Downtown (D) District - Retail, Office and Restaurant. West: Downtown (D) District - Retail and Convention Center. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 4.05-acre subject property comprises the majority of the block formed by Cleveland Street on the south, North Fort Harrison Avenue on the east, Osceola Avenue on the west, and is approximately 200 feet south of Drew Street. The property is within the Downtown (D) District and the Downtown Core character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The subject property consists of several existing structures including the 87,800 square foot AmSouth building that is located at the Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 -Page 1 0 0 northeast corner of Cleveland" Street and Osceola Avenue. Additionally, approximately one-third of the subject property consists of paved parking. The surrounding area consists of a variety of uses including: retail sales and services, business and professional offices and restaurants. Development Proposal: . The development proposal will retain the existing 87,800 square foot AmSouth building while the balance of the existing improvements on the subject property will be demolished. The demolished improvements will be replaced with 245 attached dwelling units, 35,000 square feet of retail floor area, 8,500 square feet of restaurant floor area, a ten-screen movie theatre showing first-run movies, and a 1,213 space parking garage. It is noted that within the parking garage, the City, by way of a separate development agreement, will control 360 of the proposed parking spaces for use as public parking. The development consists of two components. One component is located at the northeast corner of Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, and consists of a proposed 65-foot tall building (to roof deck) containing the movie theatre and a portion of the overall retail floor area. This component also includes the provision of architectural improvements to the existing 100-foot tall AmSouth building. The second component is located at the northeast corner of Laura Street and Osceola Avenue, and consists of a proposed 380-foot tall building (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments. This component contains all of the attached dwelling units, the restaurant floor area, the balance of the retail floor area, and the parking garage. Floor Area Ratio: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the Floor Area Ratio for properties located within the Downtown Core character district is 4.0. The development proposal consists of a total of 186,300 square feet of nonresidential floor area, thereby leaving 2.98 acres to calculate the allowable residential density. Density: Pursuant to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the maximum allowable density for attached dwellings within the Downtown Core character district is 70 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, based upon the above with regard to the Floor Area Ratio, the remaining 2.98 acres of the subject property would permit a maximum of 209 attached dwelling units. However, the development proposal consists of 245 attached dwelling units - 36 dwelling units more than is allowable. As such, the applicant has requested the use of 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool as made available by the Plan. The development proposal's compliance with the requirements for this additional density from the Pool is discussed later in the staff report. Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-903, the maximum allowable height within the Downtown (D) District is 100 feet. However, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan allows for those properties within the Downtown Core character district to have no maximum height restriction. As previously referenced, the development proposal consists both a north and a south component. The proposed height of the southern component is 65 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 13 feet for architectural embellishments, and the proposed height of the northern component is 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments. It is noted that with regard to the southern component, the proposed height does not include the existing 100-foot AmSouth building that is to remain as part of this development proposal. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan with regard to height. Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-903, parking is required to be provided at a rate of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit for attached dwellings, three parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for office, four parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for retail sales and service, and 15 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for restaurants. At the above ratios, the Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 2 9 0 proposed 245 attached dwellings (367.5), 87,800 square feet of office floor area (263.4), 90,000 square feet of retail sales and service floor area (360) and 8,500 square feet of restaurant floor area (127.5) requires a total of 1,119 parking spaces. Pursuant to Section 3-1405, when any land, building or area is used for two or more uses that are listed in the shared parking table, the minimum number of required parking spaces shall be determined by multiplying the individual minimum parking requirements by the appropriate percentages listed in the table. The following table depicts the development proposals parking requirement as per the shared parking table: WEEKDAY WEE KEND Use: Midnight 6 A.M. 9 A.M. 4 P.M. 6 P.M. Midnight 9 A.M. 4 P.M. 6 P.M. Midnight Residential (367.5) 100% = 367.5 60% = 220.5 90% = 330.75 80% = 294 90% = 330.75 Office 263.4 5% = 13.17 100% = 263.4 10% = 26.34 10% = 26.34 5% = 13.17 Restaurant (127.5) 10% = 12.75 50% = 63.75 100% = 127.5 50% = 63.75 100% = 127.5 Retail 360)* 5%= 18 70% = 252 90% = 324 100% = 360 70% = 252 Totals: 411.42 799.65 808.59 744.09 723.42 * The Retail category includes both the retail and the movie theatre parking requirements. Based upon the above, the development proposal requires a minimum of 809 parking spaces. As proposed, a total of 1,213 parking spaces will be provided; thus the development proposal exceeds its parking requirement. It is noted that of the 404 excess parking spaces, 360 will control by the City for public parking as part of a separate development agreement. Solid Waste: The components of the development proposal each include a service area accessed from Laura Street. The service area for the northern portion of the development includes a recycling holding area and a trash compactor, while the southern portion includes only the trash compactor. The proposed solid waste facilities have been found to be acceptable by the City's Solid Waste Department. Si nape: The applicant is not proposing any signage concurrent with this development proposal. Any future signage must be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. Utilities: All on-site utility facilities (i.e. electric and telecommunication lines) are required to be placed underground as part of the redevelopment of the site. Provisions for the future undergrounding of existing aboveground utility facilities in the public right-of-way must be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in a manner acceptable to the utility companies and the City. Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: The subject property is located within the Downtown Core character district of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that a key component to diversify the Downtown Core is to attract residential uses with a variety of housing types and prices with retail, restaurant and services to follow. The Plan further states that the Downtown Core shall have the highest density for residential uses and the highest intensity for retail, commercial and office uses. Public Amenities Incentive Pool: To assist in the transformation of downtown Clearwater into a quality place in which to live, work and play, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes a Public Amenities Incentive Pool of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non- residential uses. The applicant is proposing the use of 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. The amenities provided by this development in order to justify the request from the Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 3 s • Public Amenities Incentive Pool include the provision of 245 dwelling units (including those requested from the Pool) in the Downtown Core, the construction of 360 City controlled public parking on-site and streetscape improvements on Osceola Avenue, Fort Harrison Avenue and Laura Street consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the provision of these amenities, which are consistent with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, the request for 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool can be supported. Downtown Design Guidelines: As previously discussed, the development proposal consists of separate northern and southern components. The southern component, which has frontage along Cleveland Street, is respectful of the historic building, height and scale patterns along the right-of-way and has a proposed height of 65 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 13 feet for architectural embellishments. The ground level of the northern component consists of both nonresidential floor area and a parking garage. The second through seventh levels will also consist of parking garage floor area, while the balance of the structure consists of a residential tower with a proposed height of 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments. The architecture of the two components is consistent with one another and consists of architectural pre- cast panels of varying appearances throughout the entirety of the southern component and along the base and mid-section of the northern component with aluminum and glass window systems, decorative screening, and aluminum and fabric awnings. The tower section of the northern component is constructed of aluminum and glass window systems with architectural pre-cast cornices and an aluminum clad roof feature. It is noted that the tower is not solely comprised of aluminum and glass window systems, but also includes pre-cast panels providing framing to some elements of the building and comprising a large section of the tower's east elevation. The Downtown Design Guidelines identify both appropriate and inappropriate direction with regard to various elements associated with new construction in the Downtown. A review of these guidelines within the Plan was conducted and the following applicable items were identified: Block and Lot Characteristics: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the existing street grid pattern shall be retained where it contributes to an active pedestrian environment, and that blocks should be designed to promote easy pedestrian access and encourage cross-use. The development proposal consists of two components with one on either side of the Laura Street right-of-way and proposes to include a covered walkway across Laura Street between the two portions. As the development proposal includes the retention of Laura Street as part of the street grid pattern and does not propose to vacate the right-of-way in order to provide one contiguous development and includes a pedestrian connection between the two halves, the project is consistent with the above guidelines. Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the location, number and design of driveways shall maintain the urban fabric of the downtown; and that interior lot access shall be limited to the minimum number of curb cuts to adequately serve the site. The development proposal consists of one curb cut along Fort Harrison Avenue, two curb cuts on Laura Street and three curb cuts on Osceola Avenue. There are no curb cuts on Cleveland Street, which is in accordance with the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan. The proposed curb cut on Fort Harrison Avenue is for ingress/egress to the nonresidential/public parking portion of the parking garage, while the curb cuts along Laura Street provide access to the service/loading areas for both components of the development, and the curb cuts on Osceola Avenue provide ingress/egress to the residential portion of the parking garage and for a circular drive at the front of the restaurant and residential tower lobby. Based upon the scale of the development and the nature/purpose of the proposed curb cuts, the number is adequate to serve the site and consistent with the fabric of the downtown. Further, the location and Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 4 design of the curb cuts will also maintain the urban fabric of the downtown and are also consistent with the manner in which curb cuts have been previously approved in the downtown. The Downtown Design Guidelines further state that parking lots shall be located behind the primary facade of the principal building, and that interlocking pavers, brick or other similarly textured materials shall be used for parking lot surfacing and/or accents. The parking garage associated with the development is located behind nonresidential floor area on those facades adjacent to Osceola Avenue and Laura Street, and behind a faux storefront facade along Fort Harrison Avenue designed for consistency with the balance of the architectural elevations. The parking garage ingress/egress driveways on Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues as well as the circular driveway on Osceola Avenue and the western half of the Laura Street right-of-way will be constructed or reconstructed with interlocking pavers. In addition to the above, the Downtown Design Guidelines state that parking garages accessory to a principal use shall be architecturally integrated with the design, materials, finish and color of the principal structure, and that the upper floors of all parking garages shall be designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. The development proposal provides a consistent architectural treatment across all of the building facades; thus the parking garage facade blends seamlessly with the balance of the building facades. With regard to screening vehicles within the upper levels of the parking garage from view, the exterior walls have been designed as architectural pre-cast panels with openings for natural ventilation; however the openings are covered with a decorative grillwork which will visually screen the parking function while providing visual interest to the building facade. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with the above Guidelines regarding vehicular circulation/access and parking. Pedestrian Circulation/Access: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways should be provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. The development proposal includes the provision of a ten-foot wide pedestrian pathway at the north end of the site with plantings abutting the adjacent building foundation. The pedestrian pathway will connect Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues. Site Elements: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that open spaces should be provided which function as transitions between the public sidewalks and streets and the use of the property and that these open spaces shall be visible and inviting to the pedestrian. The Design Guidelines also states "the type and character of the open space should be influenced by the desired function of the space, surrounding uses and the potential users of the space ". The development proposal contains three distinct open spaces. One of these open spaces consists of the area adjacent to the circular drive at Osceola Avenue. The other two open spaces are located at the northeast and southeast corners of Osceola Avenue and Laura Street. Each of these open spaces includes areas for an outdoor cafe or is to be associated with a proposed restaurant space. The design of these spaces is such that they are inviting to the prospective user either enticing them to sit as they walk along the sidewalk or draw them into the building/tenant space. As such, the development proposal has provided open spaces in a manner suggested by the Downtown Design Guidelines. Bufferiniz and Screening: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. The development proposal locates the necessary service/loading facilities off Laura Street away from the majority of the storefronts and main pedestrian linkages. The majority of the mechanical equipment for the northern building will be located within the building on its seventh and eight floors, with additional equipment located within a mechanical core atop the tower and screened by an 27-foot high aluminum clad roof feature. The mechanical equipment serving the southern building will be located within two hubs atop Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 5 • • the building. The equipment will be located behind screens and set back 20 feet from Laura Street, 40 feet from Cleveland Street and 48 feet from Osceola Avenue. With regard to wireless communication facilities, it has been attached as a condition of approval that any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. Based upon the above and subject to the attached condition of approval, the development proposal complies with above applicable Guidelines. Coverage: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that it is appropriate to locate building farther from a build-to line in order to provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian oriented design features maintaining the build-to line. Further, the Downtown Design Guidelines state that it may be appropriate to provide separation between buildings to create adequate usable space such as an alley or open space compliant with these Guidelines. The majority of the proposed building is placed directly adjacent to the subject property lines; however portions of the building have been set back from the property line in order to accommodate open spaces for outdoor seating and pedestrian interaction. In addition, and as previously stated, the development proposal includes the provision of a ten-foot wide landscaped pathway at the north end of the site providing a pedestrian connection between Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues. Based upon the above, the development proposal complies with the above applicable Guidelines. Scale and Height: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the size and proportions of new development should be related to the scale of nearby buildings. Even if much larger than its neighbors in terms of square footage, the building should maintain the same scale and rhythm as the existing buildings. In addition, the Guidelines state that the apparent height of a building/development can be influenced and augmented by a combination of step backs, varying building heights and horizontal features. With regard to the northern building, the first seven levels have a height (83 feet) that is similar to that of neighboring buildings, such as the Clearwater Main Library (86 feet) and existing AmSouth building (100 feet). The upper portion of the building, or the tower portion, is set at an angle to the lower levels resulting in a building step back that increases from approximately two feet to 104 feet from north to south along Osceola Avenue. The angle/orientation of the tower also results in a step back from the property line abutting the Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way of approximately 130 feet. Additionally, there are other developments in the surrounding vicinity that are being proposed or that have been approved by the Board with similar heights. The Water's Edge development, which is located at the southwest corner of Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, was approved by the Board with a height of 271 feet, and the Clearwater Bay Club, which is located immediately to the north of the subject development proposal, is being proposed with a height of approximately 260 feet. It is further noted that no height limitation is imposed on development within the Downtown Core character district. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Rhythm/Spacing: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings shall have a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap". Further, the Guidelines state that with regard to high-rise buildings the building levels or step backs should be differentiated by architectural features such as coping, cornice lines and material changes; and that there should be a proportional relationship between the height of a building and the number and dimensions of step backs used to mitigate the height of the building. The south building and the lower portion of the north building each have a corresponding and distinct "base", "middle" and "cap" that is identified by material changes, cornice lines and coping. Further, the tower portion of the building also has its own distinct "base", "middle" and "cap" with the "cap" being the upper four levels of the tower, which are stepped back from the "middle". In turn, the "middle" is differentiated from the "base" by a distinct cornice line and material change at the fifth level of the tower. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 6 The proposed height of the building (380 feet to roof deck) is adjudged to be proportional to the dimensions of the step back being provided to mitigate the height. As previously discussed, the upper portion of the building, or the tower portion, is set at an angle to the lower levels resulting in a building step back that increases from approximately two feet to 104 feet from north to south along Osceola Avenue. The angle/orientation of the tower also results in a step back from the property line abutting the Fort Harrison Avenue right-of-way of approximately 130 feet. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Additional Requirements for Downtown Core along Cleveland Street: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that buildings along Cleveland Street taller than the predominant height of other buildings on the project's block should step back at that predominant height. With regard to the subject block, the development proposal will encompass all but one building along Cleveland Street (not including the AmSouth building which will remain as part of this development proposal, but be architecturally modified); thus this development will create the new predominant height for the block. However, the development proposal will still provide a step back at the height of the existing building to remain along Cleveland Street. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Architecture: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that new development shall complement the architectural heritage of the district in which it is located; however new buildings may use a variety of architectural styles as appropriate to the intended use of the building. The Guidelines state further that multiple buildings within a single project shall architecturally relate to each other and the surrounding neighborhood. There are two distinct architectural styles to the development proposal; the "base" of the development (i.e. the lower seven levels) has a more traditional style of architecture that closely resembles and is complimentary to the heritage of the district. The architecture of the tower portion is a more contemporary style, but it is a more appropriate style for the intended use of the tower as residences. The "base" (levels one through seven) and tower portions of the building each consist of architectural pre-cast panels, which serve to tie the two portions together while being consistent with the differing architectural styles of the two portions. Additionally, the two halves of the development are architecturally consistent with one another, and the existing AmSouth building will be blended seamlessly with the balance of the southern half of the project. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Primary and Corner Facades: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the primary facades shall be the most highly designed facades and utilize plane changes (i.e. projections and recesses), architectural details, variety in color, material and textures, and storefront display windows for retail uses. Further, the Guidelines state that buildings on comer lots shall emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. The development proposal consists of several primary facades each of which have been given similar highly designed facades that include projections, recesses, numerous windows of varying styles and sizes, storefront display windows for proposed retail uses, multiple cornice lines, varying roof heights and material changes. The existing AmSouth building is located at the corner of Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue. This existing building measures approximately 100 feet (to roof deck), while the proposed building making up the balance of this half of the development has a height of 65 feet (to roof deck); thus the building's prominent location will continue to be emphasized with this redevelopment. As for the northern portion of the development, the building's prominent location at the corner of Osceola Avenue and Laura Street is emphasized by the design of the proposed restaurant space, which will feature a curved exterior wall with an outdoor seating area located directly at the corner. This design will result in an open space that Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 7 0 • will be a distinguishing architectural feature for the development. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Windows and Doors: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that it is inappropriate for new development to utilize mirrored glass and glass curtain walls. Further, the Guidelines state that storefront display windows should contain both bulkheads and transoms when appropriate to the architectural style of the building. The architectural elevations of the tower, while comprised mostly of glass, do not consist of mirrored glass or glass curtain walls. The glass panes in the tower elevations are framed in aluminum with these sections broken-up vertically by architectural pre-cast panels and cornices. Further, the northern end of the tower actually has very little glass with the exception of standard window openings, as it is also comprised of an architectural pre-cast panel. As proposed, it does not appear that the bulkheads and transoms deemed appropriate by the Downtown Design Guidelines have been provided for all of the storefronts. These elements would certainly be consistent with the architectural style of the buildings, and it is therefore attached as a condition of approval that the storefront windows are revised to include both bulkheads and transoms in a manner consistent with the architectural style. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Roof Design: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that large buildings shall have multiple rooftops on varying levels that helps break up the vertical mass of the building. The proposed architectural elevations consist of several varying rooflines particularly along that portion of the southern building fronting on Cleveland Street where eight differing rooflines are proposed. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Other Architectural Features: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that shutters and canvas awnings that are sized to match to corresponding window openings should be provided. The development proposal includes the provision of three different styles/appearances of awning along the various commercial storefronts and entrances to the development. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Materials: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that building materials shall be consistent with and relate to the architectural style of the building. The Guidelines also state that the storefront level and upper levels should use visually compatible materials. The nonresidential components of the building (i.e. the lower seven levels) have a more traditional style of architecture that is complimentary to the heritage of the district, and the materials of which these areas are constructed convey this. The lower levels are constructed with architectural pre-cast panels, which the Downtown Design Guidelines states as appropriate for "the first three floors of all buildings and recommended for all other floors. " These pre-cast panels have been designed to resemble various forms of masonry exteriors, which is consistent with traditional retail storefronts. The upper levels of the development (i.e. the tower) are of a more contemporary style and the proposed aluminum, glass, and architectural pre-cast panels are representative of this. Based upon,the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Color: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that the number and type of building colors should be appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. The color scheme for the development proposal consists of browns and dark tans for the lower levels of the buildings along with tans for the upper levels of the buildings. The cornices and vertical architectural pre-cast panels within the tower will be off-white, while two different storefront fabric awnings will be provided with one being blue and the other a pattern bronze. The proposed color scheme is consistent with and appropriate for the Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 8 0 • architectural style of the buildings. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Additional Requirements for Development Along Cleveland Street Between Myrtle and Osceola Avenues and Along Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew and Chestnut Streets: The Downtown Design Guidelines state that development shall incorporate an architectural style indicative of those found in downtown Clearwater between circa 1900 and 1950, such as: 2Wh Century Commercial Vernacular, Art- Deco, Art Moderne, Chicago School, Mediterranean/Mission Influence, or Neo-Classical. The architecture of the lower portions (first seven levels) of the buildings incorporates aspects of the 20`h Century Commercial Vernacular, Art Moderne and Chicago School architectural styles, while the upper levels (the tower) is indicative of the Art Moderne architectural style. Based upon the above, the development proposal is in compliance with the above referenced Guidelines. Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies: A review of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan was conducted and the following applicable Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies were identified: ? Vision: Downtown Clearwater is a major center of activity, business and governments. The development proposal includes the provision of 245 dwelling units and 98,500 square feet of new retail and restaurant floor area in the Downtown in addition to the 87,800 square feet of existing office floor area that is being assimilated into the project. The development proposal also includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking spaces within the projects associated parking garage. As such, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Cleveland Street is downtown's "main street" and is valued both for its historic character/setting and as the major retail street. The historic character of Cleveland Street will not be negatively impacted by the development proposal in that the project is respectful of the historic building, height and scale patterns along Cleveland Street. Further, the development proposal will locate 245 dwelling units downtown and a 10-screen movie theatre fronting directly on Cleveland Street the provision of which will result in increased pedestrian activity downtown and the strengthening of the retail environment. As such, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Downtown will be an integrated community with a mix of retail, residential, office and recreational opportunities. The development of a variety of residential projects to attract new residents to Downtown is critical to the success of a revitalized Downtown. The development proposal provides the mix of uses envisioned with the above statement. Specifically, the project provides 245 dwelling units, 87,800 square feet of office floor area, 90,000 square feet of retail sales and service floor area and 8,500 square feet of restaurant floor area. The project includes a 10-screen movie theatre as part of the retail and service floor area, which will provide the recreational opportunity to the Downtown as specified by the Vision statement. Based upon the above, the development proposal will further this Vision statement. ? Vision: Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues should be redeveloped as pedestrian oriented streets and in conjunction with Cleveland Street form the major retail core of Downtown. The subject property has a substantial amount of frontage along both Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue, and the development proposal includes the provision of 98,500 square feet of new retail and restaurant floor area along these rights-of-way. The building facades have been designed at a pedestrian scale with large storefronts covered by aluminum and fabric awnings. As such, the development proposal will provide pedestrian oriented streets and enhance the retail core of Downtown; thus the project will further this Vision statement. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 9 • • ? Vision: Quality urban design is critical to new construction and renovated buildings. The development proposal incorporates classical proportions of traditional architecture as well as elements of more contemporary design. The primary facades of the development consist of storefronts designed at a human scale with those levels immediately above designed in a complementary fashion. The residential tower, as previously stated, has a more contemporary design while still incorporating some architectural characteristics of the lower levels. The development's lower levels and the tower have both been designed with a distinct "base", "middle" and "cap" in keeping with the Downtown Design Guidelines. Further, the tower component has been steps back substantially from both Osceola and Fort Harrison Avenues based upon its orientation to the lower levels of the development. Based upon the above, the development proposal will be consistent with the Vision statement. ? Vision: An adequate parking supply must be available coterminous with new uses. As previously discussed under the Off-Street Parking analysis, the development proposal requires a minimum of 898 parking spaces as per the shared parking table [ref.: Section 3-1405] and will provide a total of 1,213 parking spaces within the on-site parking garage. It is noted that 360 of the proposed 1,213 parking spaces will be control by the City for public parking as part of a separate development agreement. Thus, the development proposal exceeds the requirements of code and is consistent with this Vision statement. ? Goal 1: Downtown shall be a place that attracts people for living, employment and recreation. The City shall encourage redevelopment that will attract residents and visitors to Downtown as a recreation, entertainment and shopping destination. The development proposal consists of the provision of 245 dwelling units and 98,500 square feet of new retail (including a 10-screen movie theatre) and restaurant floor area within the Downtown Core. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Goal. ? Objective IA: All development within Downtown shall further the goals, objectives and policies of this Plan and shall be consistent with the character districts, the Downtown Design Guidelines and the Downtown zoning district. The development proposal will provide for 245 attached dwellings and 186,300 square feet of new and existing non-residential floor area as part of an attractive mixed- use development. As such, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. ? Objective 1F: Cleveland Street shall be maintained as Downtown's main street, which is valued both for both its historic character and scale of development and for its function as the major retail street. The historic character of Cleveland Street will not be negatively impacted by the development proposal in that the project is respectful of the historic building, height and scale patterns along Cleveland Street and contains the 20th Century Commercial Vernacular, Art Moderne and Chicago School architectural styles that are deemed appropriate by the Downtown Design Guidelines. Further, the development proposal will locate 245 dwelling units within the downtown area as well as a 10-screen movie theatre that will front directly on Cleveland Street. The provision of these elements will result in increased pedestrian activity downtown and the strengthening of the retail environment. As such, the development proposal will further this Objective. ? Objective 11: The City shall use all existing incentives to encourage Downtown housing and shall evaluate other incentives to encourage residential uses to locate Downtown. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan provides for a Public Amenities Incentive Pool from which development proposals may acquire additional dwelling units in excess of what the applicable density restrictions would otherwise allow. This development proposal includes a request to utilize 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Objective. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 -Page 10 • 0 ? Objective 2I: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. The development proposal includes the provision of streetscape improvements along Cleveland Street, Osceola Avenue and Fort Harrison Avenue that are consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan; thus compliance with this Objective has been achieved. ? Policy 1: The Downtown Design Guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new 'construction in the Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. As previously discussed, the development proposal is consistent with the various aspects of the Downtown Design Guidelines including, but not limited to: Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking, Scale and Height, Rhythm/Spacing, Architecture, Primary and Corner Facades, Windows and Doors, Materials and Color. Based upon the above, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. As discussed later in this staff report, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Therefore, the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. ? Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. The architectural elevations of the proposed buildings have been designed with an emphasis on pedestrian scale development. The facades include functional storefronts on Cleveland Street, Laura Street and Osceola Avenue as well as decorative faux storefronts along Fort Harrison Avenue. However, each of the storefront facades includes aluminum and glass window systems, and aluminum and fabric awnings. The pedestrian environment will also be improved through the provision of 98,500 square feet of new retail and restaurant floor area, and 245 new attached dwelling units as well as streetscape improvements along each of the abutting rights-of-way that are consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. ? Policy 6: The City shall establish a Public Amenities Incentive Pool that provides density and intensity increases for projects located in all character districts, except as limited in Old Bay, in excess of the allowable maximum development potential based on a provision of selected amenities. To overcome the numerous constraints affecting redevelopment, the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes the Public Amenities Incentive Pool, consisting of 2,296 dwelling units and 2,119,667 square feet of floor area for non-residential uses, available to all property within the Plan area. This provides an opportunity for the private sector to gain additional development potential while assisting the public to achieve its redevelopment goals for Downtown Clearwater. This development proposal will utilize 36 dwelling units from the Pool. The amenities provided by this development to justify the request include the provision of 245 residential units (including those from the Pool) in the Downtown Core, the construction of 360 City controlled public parking spaces within the development proposal's associated parking garage, and streetscape improvements on Osceola Avenue, Fort Harrison Avenue and Laura Street consistent with the City's Master Streetscaping and Wayfinding Plan. Based upon the above, compliance with this Policy has been achieved. ? Policy 12: Drive-thru facilities shall only be permitted as an accessory use and through a design that minimizes the views of the facility from rights-of-way and preserves the urban character of Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 11 • • Downtown. The development proposal will result in the elimination of a drive-thru facility that is not consistent with the above policy. As such, the project will further this Policy within the Downtown. ? Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. The development proposal will provide several amenities for the residents, including: a fitness center, two swimming pools, two clubhouses, paddle courts, and a playground. Based upon the above, the development proposal has provided sufficient amenities for the scale of the project and is consistent with the above Policy, ? Policy 20: Shared parking for commercial, office and mixed uses should be accomplished wherever possible. The development proposal makes use of the shared parking table [ref.: Section 3-1405] for the proposed residential, office, restaurant and retail uses. As such, the project is consistent with the above Policy. ? Policy 23: The City shall evaluate the need, size and location for a parking garage(s) to support entertainment, retail and/or restaurant uses. The City may support the development of these uses through the construction of a garage, participation in a public/private partnership to build a garage or contributions to assist in the construction of a garage. As previously noted, the development proposal includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking spaces within the parking garage associated with the project. These parking spaces will be owned and operated by the City; therefore the development proposal is consistent with this Policy. Downtown Core District Policies: The following applicable policies shall govern development within the District, as well as City actions: ? Priority shall be given to the construction of a garage(s) in support of the implementation of the Coachman Park Master Plan. The garage(s) shall be located to provide convenient access for park, library and marina users. As previously discussed, the development proposal includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking spaces within the parking garage associated with the project. The location of the parking garage will provide the convenient access sought by this Policy to Coachman Park and the library. ? To ensure a pedestrian friendly and safe environment, driveways shall be discouraged on Cleveland Street between Myrtle Avenue and Osceola Avenue. The development proposal is consistent with this Policy as no driveways are proposed on Cleveland Street. ? Redevelopment and new construction along Cleveland Street shall be compatible with and contribute to pedestrian vitality, human scale and historic fabric. The historic character of Cleveland Street will not be negatively impacted by the development proposal in that the project is respectful of the historic building, height and scale patterns along Cleveland Street. Further, the development proposal will locate 245 dwelling units within the downtown area as well as a 10-screen movie theatre that will front directly on Cleveland Street. The provision of these elements will result in increased pedestrian activity downtown and the strengthening of the retail environment. As such, the development proposal will further this Policy. Based upon the above, the development proposal is found to be in compliance with the policies governing development within the Downtown Core character district. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with the subject property. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 12 0 • COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the standards and criteria as per Section 2-903 and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 70 dwelling units per acre 82.04 dwelling units per acre X* (209 dwelling units) (245 dwelling units) Floor Area 4.0 4.0 X Ratio Height 30 feet 380 feet X** Parking Spaces Attached 1.5 spaces per unit 1,213 parking spaces X*** Dwellings (367.5 spaces) Office 3 / 1,000 square feet GFA (263.4 spaces) Restaurant 15 / 1,000 square feet GFA (127.5 spaces) Retail 4 / 1,000 square feet GFA (360 spaces) * It is noted that the figures with regard to Density are based upon the acreage of the site following Floor Area Ratio calculations. See above discussion regarding Densityfor further information. ** See above discussion regarding Height. *** See above discussion regarding Off Street Parking. COMPLIANCE WITH FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the Flexibility criteria as per Section 2-903.C.: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development X is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infi11 Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project X creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street X parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Downtown District Design X Guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 -Page 13 0 • COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL APPLICABILITY STANDARDS: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the General Applicability Standards as per Section 3-913: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, X bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and X use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of X the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on COMPLIANCE WITH DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES: The following table depicts the development proposals level of consistency with the Downtown Design Guidelines as per the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Site Design: Blocks and Lot Characteristics X 2. Site Design: Access, Circulation and Parking X 3. Site Design: Site Elements X 4. Building Placement: Location X 5. Building Placement: Orientation X 6. Building Placement: Separation X 7. Building Placement: Building Coverage X 8. Building Placement: Additional Requirements for Character Districts and X Special Areas 9. Building Design: Form X 10. Building Design: Architecture X 11. Signs N/A N/A 12. Lighting N/A N/A 13. Property Maintenance N/A N/A 14. Pinellas Trail N/A N/A 15. Utility/Infrastructure Facilities N/A N/A 16. Corporate Design N/A N/A SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials on September 29, 2005. The applicant has worked with Staff over the past year to provide an attractive, well-designed development that will enhance the local area and City as a whole. The development will further the City's goals of improving the character of the area and promoting private sector investment within the Downtown. Further, the development proposal is in compliance with the standards and criteria for Flexible Development approval for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, General Applicability Standards, as well as the Downtown Design Guidelines. Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 -Page 14 0 • The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C., based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law with the following conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 4.05-acres subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the Downtown Core character district; 3. That the development proposal includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking as part of a separate development agreement; 4. That the development proposal is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; That the proposed use of 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C; 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3- 913; and 8. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That all nonresidential uses proposed to be located on site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 - Page 15 0 0 a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the storefront windows are revised to consist of bulkheads and transoms to be consistent with the architectural style and the City's Downtown Design Guidelines; 12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 15, 2006); 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within three years of issuance of the first building permit; 14. That all improvements be constructed in a single phase, or alternatively that the southern building (theatre) and requisite parking, including any and all public parking, along with any streetscaping adjacent thereto, be constructed as the first phase of the development. The streetscape may also be accomplished via a separate agreement with the City; 15. That the Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the exterior renovation of the existing AmSouth building prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the northern building; and 16. That any dwelling units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not built shall be returned to the Pool. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Application Location Map Aerial Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Map Existing Surrounding Uses Map Photographs of Site and Vicinity S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBICIeveland 400 - Acqua (D) - 11-15-05(M)ICleveland Street 400 -Staff Report 11-15-05.doc Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 FLD2005-08087 -Page 16 0 Commercial 9, Institutional Development Management Owners Representation Protect Management November 11, 2005 Robert Tefft Planner I I I CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Subject: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street (CW Acqua) Response to Staff Report Dated November 15, 2005 Dear Robert: • Thank you for the electronic copy of the staff report for the above referenced project. Upon review of the report, we have the following questions/concerns we would like to discuss with the City prior to the CDB meeting on November 15th. We were advised by Gina Clayton that as long as the applicant and City Staff agree on revisions by 10:00am on the day of the CDB meeting, those revisions may be reflected in a revised staff report and submitted to the CDB along with a recommendation to keep the project on the consent agenda. The following are our questions and comments: Page 1 - "Request": You state that the request includes "an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet....". We believe this is incorrect if the reference to "permitted height" means maximum allowable height. Please see the following for the reasoning behind this statement. Page 2 - "Building Height": The first sentence, which indicates a maximum allowable height within the Downtown (D) District as "100 feet' is incorrect. Section 2-903 contains a table inset (Table 2-903) which specifically states that the maximum height for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project is "n/a". We are concerned that the current language could mislead the CDB and request that it be corrected. Page 13 - "Height": As noted previously, we believe that the height standard should be changed from "30 feet" to "n/a" per Section 2-903. This would also result in the height notation being checked as "Consistent" with no asterisk or footnote required. Page 15, Conditions 7&8: We request that the words "as described in the DRC comments and responses" be added after the word "requirements" in each condition. Commercial Development/Owner Representation/Project Management Services 1020 N. Orlando Ave, Suite 150, Maitland, FL 32751 ph: 321.206.3399 fax: 407.628.2105 Commercial 8, I nstitu tional Development Manapment Owner's Representation Project Management Robert Tefft City of Clearwater November 11, 2005 Page 2 0 Page 15, Condition 15: We request that you change this to be consistent with the business terms agreed upon in relation to the CRA Development Agreement. That language is as follows: "The recladding of the office building shall be commenced- no later than the issuance of certificates of occupancy for 85% of the residential condominium units and shall be substantially complete within 24 months thereafter." Please review these comments/concerns as quickly as possible and notify us of your availability to discuss the proposed changes. I can be reached at 321-287-5677. As always, thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, RIEKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Rieker President MWR/dps Cc: Michael Delk Gina Clayton Kevin Burke Elias Jafif Antonio De La Sema Rhea Law Andrea Zelman Tim Baker Walter Pestrak Housh Ghovaee File Commercial Development/Owner Representation/Project Management Services 1020 N. Orlando Ave, Suite 150, Maitland, FL 32751 ph: 321.206.3399 fax: 407.628.2105 C.W. Acqua and the Downtown Plaza Outline Exterior Wall Material Specifications November 15, 2005 Downtown Plaza Building Building Base 1. Sand-Blasted Dark Red Granite with watermark molding Buildiniz Wall 1. Masonry patterned Pre-Cast tinted concrete panels and White coping 2. Painted Light Gray Aluminum and Clear Glass Storefront 3. Light Gray Aluminum and Glass Canopies (Theater, Laura Street Entrance) 4. Light Gray Aluminum Awnings with Blue Fabric Covering 5. Painted Light Gray Aluminum and Clear Insulating Glass Windows 6. Architectural White Pre-Cast parapet coping Roof 1. Roof: modified bitumen built-up roof on insulated slab C.W. Acqua and the Downtown Plaza Outline Exterior Wall Material Specifications November 15, 2005 C.W. Acqua Condominium Building Podium Base 1. Sand-Blasted Dark Red Granite with watermark molding Podium Wall 1. Masonry patterned Architectural Pre-Cast tinted concrete panels and White coping 2. Light Gray Painted Aluminum and Clear Glass Storefront 3. Light Gray Aluminum and Glass Canopies 4. Light Gray Aluminum Awnings with Blue Fabric Covering 5. Light Gray painted steel decorative grill to secure garage openings 6. Architectural White Pre-Cast parapet coping Condominium Tower 9 to 12 1. Light Gray Aluminum and Blue Tinted Low E Insulating Glass Window System (Viracon VE5-52) 2. Aluminum and Blue Tinted Glass Spandrel Panels 3. Architectural Pre-Cast tinted concrete panels and White coping 4. Clear Glass and Light Gray Aluminum frame balcony railings 5. Architectural White Pre-Cast Cornice Condominium Tower 14 to 28 1. Light Gray Aluminum and Blue Tinted Low E Insulating Glass Window System (Viracon VE5-52) 2. Aluminum and Blue Tinted Glass Spandrel Panels 3. Architectural Pre-Cast tinted concrete panels and White coping 4. Clear Glass and Light Gray Aluminum frame balcony railings 5. Architectural White Pre-Cast Cornice Condominium Tower 29-34 1. Light Gray Aluminum and Blue Tinted Low E Insulating Glass Window System (Viracon VE5-52) 2. Light Gray Aluminum and Blue Tinted Glass Spandrel Panels 3. Architectural Pre-Cast tinted concrete panels and White coping 4. Clear Glass and Light Gray Aluminum frame balcony railings 5. Steel Cornice structure with Silver Anodized Aluminum Cladding Roof 1. Roof: modified bitumen built-up roof on insulated slab 6 r Commercial & Institutional Development Management Construction Services Project Management October 19, 2005 Robert Tefl3, Planner III ORIGINAL c/o Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Subject: CW Acqua and the Downtown Plaza Response to DRC Comments & Revised Development Application Submittal Package Dear Robert: Please find the following documents included in our Development Application Submittal Package: • Narrative Booklet - DRC Responses, Development Application, Revised Project Narrative, Public Amenities Incentive Pool Use Application and Vacation Request Filing Form (Original previously submitted to public works-engineering) 1 original/ 14 copies • Revised Storm-water Reports, Drainage Calculations 1 originaU14 copies • Revised Full size and 11 x 17 drawings - Illustrative Site Plan 15 sets • Survey Document (no changes) 1 originaU14 copies • Tree Surveys and Tree Inventory 15 copies ???El(J?IiJ )j • Revised half-size and full-size drawings U u ?I ll??J 15 copies • Traffic Studies (no changes) i`1 r` 4 copies PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Thank you and please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Received: RIEI[{ER & OCIATES, INC. CITY OF CLEARWATER Mark Rieker President Name Commercial Development/Construction/Project Management Services 1020 N. Orlando Ave, Suite 150, Maitland, FL 32751 ph: 321.206.3399 fax: 407.628.2105 Date ORIGINAL. 1 1 October 20, 2005 RECEIVED 1 Mr. Robert Tefft OCT 2 0 2005 1 Planner III CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. Myrtle Ave., #210 CITY OF CLEARWATER 1 Clearwater, FL 33758 RE: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland St. 1 DRC Response Supplement (Clarifications) Dear Mr. Tefft: 1 Listed below are our clarifications to the outstanding DRC questions discussed on October 17, 2005. The original DRC questions/comments are shown first, and each is immediately followed by the appropriate 1 response. Clarifications are shown in bold italics. General Engineering: 1. 1. Fire Department Connections (F.D.C.'s) shall be located a minimum of 15 feet from the face of 1 any building on site and not within a street right-of-way. Response: Acknowledged. See Revised Sheet C3.1. A meeting was conducted on 10118105 1 with the Fire Official (Chief Strong). He reviewed the locations of the FDC's and fire hydrants, and confirmed that they are acceptable as shown on the plans. Due to the physical site constraints, maintaining the 15 foot minimum clearance and keeping the FDC's out of the ' street right-of-way are not possible. 2. F.D.C.'s shall be located no further than 40 feet from a Fire Hydrant Assembly. 1 Response: Acknowledged. See Revised Sheet C3.1. As with Item I above, Chief Strong has reviewed and approved the location of the FHA's per the current Sheet C3.1 plan. 1 3. Fire Hydrant Assembly shall be located on same side of the street as the F.D.C. served by the F.H.A. 1 Response: Acknowledged. See Revised Sheet C3.1. As with Item I above, Chief Strong has reviewed and approved the location of the FDC's and FHA's per the current Sheet C3.1 plan. 1 4. Submit complete application for vacation of the alley right-of-way. Proposed vacation of existing alley shall not be reviewed by the City Council pric: to approval of the FLD case by the Community Development Board. (Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773). 1 Response: The original application for vacation of the alley right-of-way was submitted to engineering on the same day the application for the flexible development was submitted. Each bound package contained a photo copy of the application. We are again enclosing 1 Page 1 of 16 1 & WRIGINAL 1 copies of the application which now includes letters of "no objection" from Progress Energy, Knology and Verizon. In addition, we are confirming that we have now contacted 1 Steve Doherty, and have also followed up on the letter received from Knology requesting additional information. Please see Northside Engineering's letter dated 10113105 providing the information Knology requested in order to process our vacation request. We are confident that we will come to an acceptable arrangement with Knology, and we will continue to follow up on 1 this until it is resolved. As soon as we receive the letter of no objection, it will be forwarded to the City as a confirmation. 5. Handicapped parking spaces shall be relocated to be near elevators and designed so that movement by handicapped individuals into vehicular use areas is not required to access building. 1 Response: Two Handicapped parking spaces located at the Ft. Harrison entrance to the parking garage will be moved to the Osceola St pedestrian entrance to allow more direct handicapped access. See Revised Sheet C2.1 and Revised Sheet A-101 for relocated 1 handicap spaces. Pursuant to the clarifications made in our meeting on October 17, the current drawings have been deemed acceptable. 1 6. Ramp to second floor parking and entrance into ground level parking lot is potentially a major conflict point. Provide information as to how this will function with out a significant conflict when office workers, movie-goers and other users of the parking lots are exiting at the same time. 1 Response: The intersection has now been revised to incorporate clear control of movements through it by utilizing stop signs and stop bars much like those used to control traffic at typical roadway intersections. See Revised Sheet A-101. It is agreed that the traffic controls 1 must be utilized in order to reduce mishaps in the garage, thus further analysis and review of this intersection will occur when plans are submitted for building permitting. ' 7. Indicate on the Utility Plan which water taps service each component of the development. Response: The locations for domestic water taps leading to each major development ' component are now identified clearly on the plans as requested. Please see Revised Sheet C3.1. As a clarification, the locations for the taps were identified and confirmed during our 10/17105 meeting, and they remain as previously shown. ' 8. NOTE: Additional comments may be necessary based on the responses to conditions. ' All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all workmithin the right-of-way of any of the ' adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the City. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Response: Acknowledged. See Note on Revised Sheet C2.1. 2. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Florida D.O.T.. 1 Response: Acknowledged. Right-of-way permit to be obtained by FDOT prior to building permit. RIMCNVED OCT 2 0 2005 Page 2 of 16 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 • OR1r-3 I ?./A r 3. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) ' Response: Acknowledged. See Note on Revised Sheet C2.1. 4. Compensation to the City of Clearwater to remove 6 metered parking spaces on the south side of Laura Street will be required. Contact Parking Facilities Manager, Tracy Bruch at (727) 562-4771. Response: We ae' t options forr- the r';+-,'° the LftuFft StFeet fight of wnoauc.a usavn. design, design, way is being upgraded to inelude new str-eetseaping and pedestFiftff f-Fiendly pedestrian eNper-ienee. We have no spaee to eompensate for- lost street par-king in the thus a deeision must be made on the City's behalf to give priority tO Pfflkiftg OF •developer's f whieh is why we haven't ehanged the plans. uHoweveF, we are also willing to ,.*;':ze Option 2 if the City pr-e? As agreed, the developer will compensate the City at the rate of $1,092 per lost metered space (6 spaces), for a total amount of $6,552. 5. Show location of required grease trap for restaurant. Response: The locations of required grease traps for restaurants have not yet been determined. However, they will be shown on the Construction Documents when submitted ' for building permit, thus allowing the City to provide feedback and approval capacity at that time. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ' Environmental: 1. Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if ' specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. ' Response: Underground vault is being proposed in lieu of a surface treatment pond. The proposed redevelopment project is located in the downtown corridor. Due to site constraints and buildings allowed to be placed at a 0' setback, there is no. room for a surface treatment pond. Along with the required landscaping, this is impractical for the site. The City has agreed to the basic approach, piping arrays and general methodology for the underground stormwater storage vault system. ' 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. Response: See Revised Sheet C3.1 for oil and grease separator detail. Please refer to Revised Sheet C3.1 and new Sheet C4.1 for location and details?rr??toi nc?-g as ; 1 ? separator. ?. OCT 2 0 205 Page 3 of 16 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • 9 ORIGINAL 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Response: See Revised Sheet C3.1 for vault cross-section and detail. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Response: Vault maintenance schedule has been included herewith as an attachment to the stormwater narrative. Fire: 1. Crosswalk canopies are required to be 14' minimum height. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Crosswalk Canopy located at Laura Street entrance to parking garage connecting to Retail/Theater entrance will have 14 feet height clearance below canopy construction. See Revised Sheet A-101. 2. FDC are required to be 15' from building. Acknowledge and show on plan PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged. See Revised Sheet C3.1. A meeting was conducted on 10118105 with the Fire Official (Chief Strong). He reviewed the locations of the FDC's and fire hydrants, and confirmed that they are acceptable as shown on the plans. Due to the physical site constraints, maintaining the 15 foot minimum clearance and keeping the FDC's out of the street'right-of-way are not possible. It is also noted that the current width of Laura Street is acceptable for the passage of fire trucks per Chief Strong. 3. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response: This building is designed to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, and meets the requirements for High Rise Structure which include but are not limited to Fire Code items such as Fire Pump and generator for electric pump(s), fully automatic sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, fire-fighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized stairwells, stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. See Revised Sheet A-101. 4. Show location of Fire Command room in highrise. PRIOR TO CDB Response: A location of Fire Command Room is identified on the,revised,,,y Residential highrise Lobby Plan. See Revised Sheet A-101. f \l/J Page 4 of 16 ? ' # d05 INNING DEPARTMENT ", rW (71 P&DWAI 9 ORIGINAL 5. A life safety evaluation in accordance with NFPA 101,12.4.1 is required. Acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. A Life Safety Evaluation in accordance with NFPA 101, 12.4.1 will be provided at building permit submittal. See Revised Sheet A- 101. 6. An automatic wet standpipe with fire pump and emergency generator for backup power for pump and elevator will be required in theater building. Acknowledge and show locations on plan PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. An automatic wet standpipe with fire pump and emergency generator for back-up power for pump and elevator will be provided in Retail/Theater Building. See Revised Sheet A-101. 7. Must meet the requirements of NFPA 40 "Cellulose Nitrate Film" in theatre building. Acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. "Cellulose Nitrate Film" is not being used in the theatre building. 8. Plans show pavers to be used as road surfaces. Must be engineered to withstand an 80,000 lb weight load. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB Response: Pavers will be able withstand 80,000 lbs for emergency vehicles. See Note on Revised Sheet 2.1. 9. Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT Response: Acknowledged. The project will have fire flow calculations performed by a Fire Protection Engineer prior to permit. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments RECEI,VED Parks and Recreation: 1. No issues - project in CRA. OCT 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 5 of 16 ' Stormwater: ORIGINAL 1. 1) Correct acreage error in the stormwater narrative. Response: See attached corrected narrative for stormwater. ' 2) Show how post-development runoff is directed to stormwater vault. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Response: See Revised Sheet C3.1 for runoff to vault. The City has agreed to the ' basic approach, piping arrays and general methodology for the underground stormwater storage vault system. ' Prior to issuance of a building permit the following conditions are to be met: 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit for the proposed project. ' Response: Acknowledged. SWFWMD permit or exemption will be obtained prior to building permit. 2) As this site will tie into the proposed Cleveland Streetscape project, the applicant is to pay for the upgrade of the proposed 18" line to a 36" line from structure 5-136 to S-1.35. ' Response: Acknowledged. See Note on Revised Sheet C3.1. 3) The 36" city owned storm line proposed on Osceola Ave is to have street inlets to pick up road runoff from Osceola. At Laura St. there into be an inlet on each corner and at ' other locations as directed by the City Engineer based on more detailed information on Osceola Ave. No pipe run of 36" storm pipe is to be longer than 400 L.F. without an access point. Response: Acknowledged. See Note on Revised Sheet C3.1. ' 4) All proposed work in the Osceola Ave R.O.W. is to be accomplished by issuance of a city R.O.W permit issued by the Engineering Dept. ' Response: Acknowledged. Right-of-Way permit to be obtained by City of Clearwater Engineering Dept. See Note on Revised Sheet 3.1. RECEIVED ' Solid Waste: No Comments 2 Q 2005 Traffic Engineering: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' 1. Disabled spaces must be located near elevator or accessible entrance. CITY OF CLEARWATER Response: Parking Spaces for the Disabled are located at each Public Elevator and ' accessible Entrance to the Building. Disabled spaces have been distributed to provide some near the elevator in addition to other accessible entrances. See Revised Sheet A- 101 through A-104. ' 2. Parking garage must comply with vertical clear height for disabled parking space(s). The minimum vertical clear height must be 8 feet 2 inches (8'2") per Florida Building Code ' Chapter It. ' Page 6 of 16 ORIGINAL 1 Response: The Parking Garage allows minimum 8'-2" vertical clear height at each 1 parking level as per the Florida Building Code, Chapter 11. See Revised Sheet A-101. 3. The entrance gate along Fort Harrison has the potential to cause queuing of vehicles or 1 stacking on the public right-of-way during p.m. peak hours. During the pm peak, the submitted traffic study indicates 81 vph southbound turning right into the proposed garage, 121 vph northbound turning left into the proposed garage, 254 vph exiting the garage and 700 vph or greater in the northbound and southbound lanes of Fort Harrison. Please provide necessary mitigation to relieve traffic congestion and queuing on the public right-of-way. Response: The Entrance Gates to the public Parking Garage have been revised to allow more than 40 feet of queuing space for stocking of vehicles. See Revised Sheet A-101. Pursuant to our discussions on 10117105 we have revised the entrance on Sheets A-101 and C3.1, and our traffic engineer has confirmed that we do not violate level of service requirements. However, we also acknowledge that additional revisions may be required by the City in the future if a deceleration lane is deemed necessary and coordinated by the City with the neighboring development proposed to the north of our site. 4. The slope of the ramp from Osceola Avenue is steep, are there any precautions to avoid pedestrian or vehicular conflicts when motorist(s) are exiting the ramp? If not, please design. 1 Response: The ramp for the Residential Parking, exiting to Osceola Street will require transition ramps and a full stop at the sidewalk before proceeding. Additionally our Parking Consultant proposes a flashing signal to alert pedestrians of cars exiting. 1 Transition ramps with lesser slopes have been provided at the foot of the ramp. See Revised Sheet A-101. Sheets A-101 and C3.1 have been revised and coordinated to indicate the slopes of the ramps. We are also acknowledging that the safety and traffic ' control details will be worked out in detail during the building permitting process. 5. Show a scaled WB-40 truck maneuvering in and out of loading zone. ' Response: See Sheet Revised C2.1 for maneuverability of WB-40 truck in and out of loading zones. Please see revised sheet C2.1 for the requested maneuvering paths for the 1 trucks in and out of the service areas. 6. Show roadway width dimension on Laura Street which must be approved by the City's Fire ' Department for the fire truck access. Response: See Revised Sheet C2.1 for dimension of Laura Street. In a 10118105 meeting, Chief Strong confirmed that the existing dimensions of Laura Street are sufficient 1 for the passage of fire trucks, thus no change is required. 7. Show 20' X 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points. (City's 1 Community Development Code, Section 3-904). Response: All site visibility triangles have been located. See Revised Sheet C2.1. 1 Requested site visibility triangles are now included on Sheets L1.0 and C3.L DMECHVED 1 OCT 2 0 2005 ' Page 7 of 16 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • ORIGINAL. 8. Indicate the type(s) of traffic control devices that will be provided for vehicles exiting access ramp and entrance to first floor parking (stop sign, stop bar, speed bump, warning lights, traffic signal light, etc.). Response: The vehicles exiting the First Level Public parking will have to observe a full stop at a stop sign and corresponding stop bar to yield to vehicles entering the First Level parking or vehicles exiting the Second Level parking by way of the ramp. See Revised Sheet A-101. It was agreed that these details will be coordinated during the building permitting process, however sheets A-101 and C3.1 do contain some current improvements that indicate our intent to comply. 9. Middle lane shall be bi-directional to respond to anticipated peak traffic volume demand. Response: The Middle access lane has been revised to be bi-directional to respond to anticipated peak traffic volume. See Revised Sheet A-101. This has now been coordinated on Revised sheet C3.1. 10. Show location of ticket dispensing machine. Location must be forty feet (minimum) away from back edge of sidewalk. Response: The location of the ticket dispensing machine for the Public Parking has been revised to a distance of over 40 feet from the back edge of the sidewalk. See Revised Sheet A-101. Plans have now been coordinated as requested, and additional depth from-the street to the ticket dispensing machine has been incorporated to the greatest extent possible. 11. Ramps on Sheets A105 and A106 appear to be labeled incorrectly. Response: The Ramps on Revised Sheets A105 and A106 have been labeled correctly. General Note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. Response: Acknowledging general note. Specific details are being addressed within the CRA Development Agreement relating to this topic. PARKING SYSTEMS COMMENTS 1. 360 Public parking spaces owned and operated by City; 235 public spaces owned and operated by Developer. Should be one operator for all public parking. There would be no way to differentiate who parked where. Response: We agree that one operator should be assigned under a joint agreement between City and Developer. Developer envisions that differentiation and secure access for office tenants would take place via traditional electronic access cards and gates. The general public would take a ticket (time stamped) upon entry and pay either the attendant or an electronic payment center on the way out. As requested, we have now incorporated revised Sheet A-103 indicating proposed locations for control arms intended to isolate the office parking spaces during normal office hours. Those arms will automatically open during non-office hours to allow public parking to occur in those areas. We have agreed to work together to establish a single operating entity for the public side of the garage, and to come to agreement on an equitable share of ex-pe tee-paid. by the office users.f Page 8 of 16 OCT 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CCTV Or- (-i rwo Imm UUL`:3 Lea V 11?3 OCT 02005 • oR N PLANNING DEPARTMENT A L CITY OF CLEARWATER 2. Agreement (6.04.a) states public parking condos on level 1 & 2. Plans show a total of 278 public parking spaces on level 1 & 2. Where is the City's public parking located? Response: The City's public parking occurs on levels 1, 2 and 3, plus all but the NE corner of level 4 during non-office hours. Office tenants will be provided with 200 "Reserved Parking" stalls during office hours. Reserved stalls will bear signage warning of towing of cars without a reserved parking sticker during prescribed office hours (6:OOAM - 6:OOPM). See response #1 above. 3. Conflict point @ ramp on level 1 and access level 1 parking. Response: The vehicles exiting the First Level Public parking will have to observe a full stop at a stop sign to yield to vehicles entering the First Level parking or vehicles exiting the Second Level parking by way of the ramp. With the provision of a stop bar for level 1 vehicles and clear view of the down bound traffic the potential for conflict is minimized. See Revised Sheet A-101. It was agreed that these details will be coordinated during the building permitting process, however sheets A-101 and C3.1 do contain some current improvements that indicate our intent to comply. 4. Insufficient queuing area to enter facility. Response: The control gates have been relocated beyond 40' from the back from the sidewalk as requested. See Revised Sheet A-101. Plans have now been coordinated as requested, and additional depth from the street to the ticket dispensing machine has been incorporated to the greatest extent possible. H/C spaces on level 1 at entrance area. What is their destination? No elevator on Ft. Harrison side of property indicates Acqua is not the primary destination. Better location elsewhere? ' Response: Two of the four handicap parking spaces shown at the Ft Harrison entrance have been relocated to the Osceola St. entrance, as shown on the Revised Plans. See Revised Sheet A-101. It was determined that the plans are satisfactory as currently drawn. ' 6. No mention of an access control system leading from the public parking to the private residential parking. ' Response: There is no direct access between the Public Parking and the Private Residential Parking. On Level 4, there is a separation wall between the two parking areas shown on the Revised Plans. See Revised Sheet A-104. It was agreed that security ' and traffic control details will be coordinated during the building permitting process. 7. Column placement on stall lines near rear of stall. Very difficult to park resulting in damage ' to vehicles & difficulty opening vehicle doors. Appears column placement is for residential tower above garage and not ideal placement for garage. Explore engineering of column placement to reduce or eliminate the number of columns in stalls. ' Response: The above comments are incorrect. All parking stalls have been designed so that the structure (columns) are set back in the parking space from the aisle to allow ' easy vehicle turning from the aisle into the parking space. In order to accommodate the ' Page 9 of 16 0 • ORIGINAL typical parking garage structural grid, a structural transfer floor on the 8th level has been designed to convert the residential tower structural grid to the parking garage grid. See Revised Sheets A-101 through A-107. We have revisited the structural column placement with our structural engineer, and we have improved the consistency of column spacing throughout the garage, and particularly on the ramp areas in order to minimize door conflicts with columns. Sheets A-101 through A-107 have been revised accordingly. Garage Management office space (20 X 20) with a view of entrance/exit area. Space shown does NOT provide the visibility required for management. Response: The Garage Management Office is revised and moved forward. Adjacent parking has been re-arranged to provide improved visual control for Management. See Revised Sheet A-101. See Revised Sheet A-101 for additional improvements as discussed on 10/17/05. 9. Operation of garage including but not limited to: hours of operation, fee schedule, financial pro-formas. ' Response: It is the intent of the CRA Development Agreement to address the comments above. At present there is insufficient data available for the Developer to respond to the specific details noted above. Such details will be outlined in broad form prior to the ' CDB meeting. We have agreed to work together to establish a single operating entity for the public side of the garage, and to come to agreement on an equitable share of expenses to be paid by the office users. 10. Will City be responsible for any condo maintenance fees for the parking spaces? Response: Yes, eoeh owner-ship entity must heaF its r-espeetive maintenanee , just as it would in any other- 9WHed . As discussed on 10117105, we misinterpreted this question. The public garage is in no way linked to the private portion of the garage, and the public garage entity will not be responsible for fees of any kind to the residential condo association. 11. Fiber optic capability to link facility operation back to MSB. Response: The developer will provide (2) 2" conduits for the City's future fiber optics up to and including a pull box at the Acqua property line. The developer will not be responsible for infrastructure installations beyond the defined limits of work. See Revised Sheet A-101. 12. Handicap accessible islands for cashiering function. Islands must be ramped for cashiers in wheelchairs. Response: Islands are ramped for h/c accessibility. See Revised Sheet C2.1 and Revised Sheet A-101. Pursuant to discussions held 10/17105, this has been revised and is included on Sheets A-101 and C3.1. 13. Cashier booth should be located at Exit - not entrance lane. OCT 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 10 of 16 CITY OF CLEARWATER ic- OCT 2 0 2010 ORIGINAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT RWoML'AWZ1kM7rbe a Cashier Booth for each of the Exit Lanes (2 total). See Revised Sheet A-101. Pursuant to discussions held 10/17105, this has been revised and is included on Sheets A-101 and C3.1. ' 14. Cashier booth for center island needed. Garage large enough to support 2 cashiers during ' busy periods. Response. A second cashier booth has been added to accommodate the need for a second cashier. See Revised Sheet A-101. Pursuant to discussions held 10117105, this has been revised and is included on Sheets A-101 and C3.L 15. Center lane can be reversible - needs to be shown. When in operation center lane restricted to left turns only and primarily exit restricted to right turns only. Response: Center lane is reversible. Turning restrictions are indicated as requested. See Revised Sheet C2.1 and Revised Sheet A-101. Pursuant to discussions held 10117105, this has been revised and is included on Sheets A-101 and C3.1. 16. Railing to keep pedestrians from walking out of stairwell in NE corner directly into entrance lane. t Response: The NE corner stairwell has been revised to allow access only to the sidewalk. See Revised Sheet A-101. Pursuant to discussions held 10117105, this has been revised and is included on Sheets A-101, L1.0 and C3.1. The doorway from the stair now exits to the north to avoid pedestrian traffic from exiting directly into the public right-of- way. Planning: 1. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that parking lots are to be designed in such a way that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. How is light glare (i.e. vehicle headlights and lights within the garage) being restricted from encroaching upon the neighboring properties and rights-of-way? Consider the provision of louvered panels within the openings along the exterior of the parking garage or some other means by which this issue can be resolved. ' Response: The Garage Exterior Walls have been designed with Architectural Pre-Cast Panels with openings for natural ventilation where possible. The openings are covered ' with a decorative grill-work which will visually screen the parking function and provide visual interest and scale for pedestrians, both at street level and on upper garage levels. Lighting glare will be controlled by selection of low-glare lighting fixtures which implement shielding where cut-offs to neighboring properties or streets is desired. Where necessary to prevent car headlight nuisance, a solid backing panel will be attached to the decorative grilles. Where abutting adjacent properties the garage walls are solid pre-cast infill to accommodate fire code requirements and prevent unwanted ' parking noise or lighting. Mechanical ventilation will also be used to exhaust fumes from the parking garage. See Revised Sheets A-302 and A-303. Sheet A-101 is now revised with a table to provide the requested calculations. ' 2. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the ground floors of parking garages accessory to the principal use shall have at least 75 percent of the primary fagade ' occupied by the principal use(s)/features or other complimentary use. While that portion of ' Page 11 of 16 0 0 ORIGINAL the development north of Laura Street has primary facades along North Fort Harrison Avenue, Laura Street and North Osceola Avenue, it may not meet the above requirement. Provide calculations for the combined percentage of the facades as per the above. Response: The revised Plans show that at least 75% of each of the principal facades (Osceola St., Laura St., Ft. Harrison St.) is occupied by the principal use(s)/features and therefore the revised design meets this requirement. See Revised Sheet A-101. Sheet L1.0 has now been revised to include the walkway and landscape improvements. 3. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the upper floors of all parking garages shall be designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. Clarify how the upper floors have been designed to meet this ' requirement. Response: The garage openings are fitted with decorative grilles and solid backers (up to headlight elevation) in order to visually screen the vehicles from view. See Revised Sheet A-302 and A-303. Sheet A-201 has been revised to indicate the necessary treatments on the fafade. 4. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. Clearly indicate the locations of all mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, etc. and the means by which they will be screened. ' Response: To correspond to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, we have designed screening solutions as follows: a. Mechanical equipment for the Parking and Condo Building will consist of cooling ' towers and chillers mounted on the 7th Parking Level with an opening in the slab above on the 8th Level to accommodate venting. This will minimize the exposure of the equipment for the residents and have no visual impact on the Public Right of Ways below at street level or from adjacent buildings. See Revised Sheet A-302. b. Mechanical Equipment for the Retail/Theater Building will be located on the roofs ' of the structure, screened and set back from the perimeter so that visual impact is minimized from the Residential Building and unseen from the Public Right of Ways and surrounding buildings. See Revised Sheet A-151. c. The Loading and Service areas for both parcels of the Project are located at the East end of Laura St., across from each other to create an efficient and visually controllable service area. Each will include Electrical Transformers, Emergency Generators, Electrical Equipment Rooms, and Trash Compactors in addition to the Truck Unloading Bays. Doors for each loading area will conceal service docks and trash facilities from plain view. See Revised Sheet A-101. d. Wireless Communications equipment will be located on the roof of the mechanical equipment room for the elevator tower, with architectural screening for the ' equipment on all sides. No equipment will be visible either up close or at a distance. See Revised Sheet A-151. RE"EVED 1 GICT 2 0 2005 Page 12 of 16 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 10 ORIGINAL With regard to the northern portion of the development, the building is to be set back approximately 10 feet from the north property line. Please clarify why the building has been set back in such a manner and what is proposed to occur in this space. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that seperations between buildings shall provide adequate useable space as an alley or open space complaint with these Guidelines. If such a useable space can not be accomplished in this subject area, then it is strongly recommended that the building be constructed to the north property line. Response: The approximately 8 to 10 foot wide setback on the north side of the building ' results from building the parking garage structure as efficiently as possible. The setback is shown to be treated with a 6' sidewalk, landscaping and lighting to provide a passageway between Ft. Harrison and Osceola Streets. However, the developer remains open to the installation of single story walls to "barricade" the passage against the shared property line if necessary. See Revised Sheet A-101. 6. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that "the size and proportions of new development should be related to the scale of nearby buildings. Even if much larger than its neighbors in terms of square footage, the building should maintain the same scale and rhythm ' as the existing buildings". Please provide a response that specifically addresses how the development proposal is consistent with the above requirement of the Plan. ' Response: As evidenced by the 3D color renderings and the B/W elevations, each primary facade on Cleveland, Osceola, Fort Harrison and Laura Streets responds to the relationship and scale of nearby buildings, and enhances the facades with consistent ' rhythms and high quality materials complementary to surrounding buildings. Significant design differentiators have been incorporated into the street facades in order to minimize the presence and scale of the residential tower at the pedestrian level. 7. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that "new development and redevelopment should respect the vertical height of existing or approved adjacent buildings and contribute to a pedestrian scale". Please provide a response as to how the development proposal is consistent with the above referenced requirement of the Plan. Response: The pedestrian experience associated with this development is precisely in keeping with the Design Guidelines and the objectives defined in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. By creating a retail base with inviting storefronts, covered walks, and architectural detailing and canopies the scale becomes human, and the presence of the residential tower mass is almost imperceptible. We invite you to imagine walking along any of the adjacent streets to experience this first hand. 8. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that buildings that visually overpower adjacent buildings are inappropriate. Please provide a response (perhaps in relations to the 0 5; bove comment pertaining to height) that addresses how the development proposal does not verpower adjacent buildings. ' 2 Q F-5 (1121Z? 0 ? - 1-64 esponse: Contrary to the above point, the Redevelopment Plan specifically defines the al rD Mowntown Core as the City's most desired location for the highest density of development, and further stipulates that no height limit exists. As the same time it -4?equires stepbacks in facades to mitigate height and mass, a consistent scale and rhyme cry n Cleveland Street to respect the historical facades, expressions of a base, middle and ' m top, and sensitivities to pedestrian scale, all of which have been accomplished within the Page 13 of 16 i 0 • ORIGINAL i design. Further, the City has recently approved similarly sized developments (eg. Water's Edge - less than one block away) so the notion that this development "visually overpowers" others would be incorrect. Instead, it is becoming part of the fabric of a well-planned and revitalized downtown skyline. 9. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that buildings along Cleveland Street taller than the predominant height of other buildings on the project's block shall step back at the predominant height. Provide a revised elevation (black/white line drawing) that shows the proposed building in relation to the existing adjacent buildings along Cleveland Street. i Response: Elevation Drawing A202 for the "Downtown Plaza" has been revised to recognize the existing adjacent building to the East on Cleveland Street by stepping back the Theater fagade approximately 6 feet and creating a terrace at that level. To the West, the existing bank building has been shown re-clad and its primary fagade referenced in the proposed Theater Building which steps back at that approximate i height to retain the prominence of the existing bank building on the corner of Cleveland and Osceola Streets. i 10. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the primary fagade shall be the most highly designed fagade. The primary facades along North Fort Harrison Avenue (parking garage) and Laura Street are inconsistent with the referenced elements to be found on primary facades. Additional and/or improved architectural treatments are necessary to achieve compliance with the Plan in regard to the above. Response: The Building Elevations of the primary facades along North Fort Harrison and Laura Street have been revised to correspond to the primary facades on Osceola and Cleveland Street and include the design elements and detailing established on those primary facades. (See Revised Color Renderings.) Sheet A-201 has been revised to indicate the necessary treatments on the fafade. 11. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that primary facades shall include i three articulated architectural parts: a base, middle and cap. The development proposals primary facades along North Forth Harrison Avenue and Laura Street do not achieve compliance with this item and will need to be revised. i Response: The primary facades along North Fort Harrison and Laura Street have been revised to correspond to the Project's primary fagade on Osceola Street which i articulates a base, middle and cap in contrasting architectural pre-cast color and pattern with a granite base and a pre-cast cap forming the cornice element. (See revised color renderings.) Sheet A-201 has been revised to indicate the necessary treatments on the fagade. 12. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that it is appropriate to provide shutters and/or canvas awnings sized to match the corresponding window openings. It is ' recommended that awnings consistent with those proposed along Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue are provided along Laura Street and Fort Harrison Avenue. i Response: The building elevations along Laura and Fort Harrison Avenue now have awnings similar to those proposed on Cleveland Street and Osceola as shown on the revised color renderings. Sheet A-201 has been revised to indicate the necessary treatments on the fagade. Rv= SVE. i Page 14 of 16 OCT 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT per/ A.%I 1 • ? ORIGINAL 1 13. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that first floor awnings should be placed no higher than the midpoint between the top of the first story window and the bottom 1 of the second story windowsill. Clarify the height of the ceiling for the first floor of the AmSouth building as the awnings would appear to exceed the thresholds set above. 1 Response: The first floor awnings for the office building have been revised to meet the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. They will be installed so the top of the awning begins between the top of the first story window and the sill of the second story window. (See 1 revised color rendering.) 14. Clarify the height of the precast parapet on the northern building. 1 Response: The height of the pre-cast parapet at the top of the podium is 86'6". See Revised Sheet A-201. 1 15. Clarify the height of the Mech. P.H. roof on the northern building. ' Response: The height of the Mech. P.H. Roof of the Residential Tower (Northern Building) is 400' above ground level. See Revised Sheets A-201 through A-204. ' 16. The southern building has multiple roof heights as per the architectural elevations; however the roof plan depicts a flat roof (one height). Please clarify. Response: The Roof Plan for the Southern Building has been corrected to show the ' multiple roof levels. See Revised Sheet A-151. 17. Clarify the heights of the parapets along the southern building. ' Response: The parapet heights along the Southern Building are 4 feet above the roof. The Elevation tags on Revised Sheets A-201 through A-204 have been corrected. ' 18. The response to General Applicability Criterion #1 does not discuss how the proposed development is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage density or character of the adjacent ' properties. Provide a revised response which addresses the criterion. Response: The Project Narrative has been updated to respond to the above comments. 1 (See enclosed Revised Project Narrative.) 19. General Applicability Criterion #6 refers to how the development proposal minimizes adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory effects and hours of operation impacts. The response 1 provided does not deal with any of the above elements. Response: The Project Narrative has been updated to respond to the above comments. ' (See enclosed Revised Project Narrative.) 20. The responses provided for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #7 and #8 1 do not address how the criteria are being met, only that they are. Please provide revised responses. EC VE 1 OU 2 0 2005 1 Page 15 of 16 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 • ORIGINAL Response: The Project Narrative has been updated to respond to the above comments. (See enclosed Revised Project Narrative.) Other: No Comments If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, Mark Rieker Applicant Acqua and The Downtown Plaza `?IIECBIVED Page 16 of 16 OCT 2 0 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • t ORIGINAL Mark Rieker From: doreen [doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 8:54 AM To: Mark Rieker Subject: Fw: CW Acqua FLD2005-08084 Her you go DM ECEVE D -----Original Message----- OCT 2 0 [??? From: <steve.strong@MyClearwater.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 08:29:06 To : <Doreen@norths ideengineering . com> PLANNING DEPARTMENT Subject: RE: CW Acqua FLD2005-08084 CITY OF CLEARWATER Yes all the referenced items are what was agreed upon. S.C. Strong Fire Bureau Chief / Assistant Fire Marshal 610 FRANKLIN STREET Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: 727.562.4327 ext.3039 Fax: 727.562.4461 -----Original Message----- From: Doreen Williams [mailto:Doreen@northsideengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 11:06 AM To: Strong, Steve Subject: CW Acqua FLD2005-08084 Hi Steve. The developer wanted me to send a recap letter regarding our meeting this morning with your confirmation of all agreed upon items. Please acknowledge via e-mail. Thanks Doreen [Strong, Steve] Fire Dept. Conditions 1. All three proposed FDC's are within 15' of a building. Two FDC's are located within the Laura Street ROW and one FDC is located within the Osceola Ave. ROW. It was agreed that with site constraints, the location of all FDC's are acceptable to the Fire Department. 2. Proposed FDC's are greated thatn 40-feet from a FHA. It was agreed that with site constraintes, the distance of the FDC from the FHA is acceptable to the Fire Department. 3. The FDC proposed for the north side of Laura Street does not satisfy this requirement (Fire hydrant assembly shall be located on same side of street as FDC). Fire Department agreed an additional hydrant on the same side of the street is not necessary. Traffic Condition 1. Laura Street width is shown as 22.51. Fire Department typically requires 24' for two-way traffic. Due to Laura Street being a City street and it is existing, the Fire Department is acceptable with this width as a current condition. Steve, please acknowledge these are the items we discussed in our meeting and that all comments are true and correct so I may forward to the necessary City Planning Staff Members and Development Team. Thanks Doreen stl\:* ( BEHAVIOR: url(##ieooui) ) @page Sectionl (size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin: .5in; mso-footer-margin: .5in; mso-paper- source: 0; ) P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: Oin Oin Opt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times 1 0 0 Tefft, Robert From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:09 AM To: 'mrieker@riekerassociates.com' Subject: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street (Acqua at the Downtown Plaza) Mark Please find attached the conditions I referenced in our earlier phone conversation. I will contact you shortly with available meeting times for next Monday (10/17/05). Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 C Cleveland Street 400 - Case Co... FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street (Acgua at the Downtown Plaza): calculations regarding the above have been provided, only a statement of compliance. ? ?v" -1-1 % C? planning Conditions: 1. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the ground floors of parking garages accessory to the principal use shall have at least 75 percent of the primary facade occupied by the principal use(s)/features or other complimentary use. While that portion of the development north of Laura Street has primary facades along North Fort Harrison Avenue, Laura Street and North Osceola Avenue, it may not meet the above requirement. Provide calculations for the combined percentage of the facades as per the above. 10/13/05: No 2. With regard to the northern portion of the development, the building is to be set back approximately 10 feet from the north property line. Please clarify why the building has been set back in such a manner and what is proposed to occur in this space. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that seperations between 1- f buildings shall provide adequate useable space such as an alley or open space compliant with these Guidelines. If such a useable space can not be accomplished in this subject area, then it is strongly recommended that the ly- building be constructed to the north property line. 10/13/05: The revised sheet A101 depicts a walkway (as referenced in the response letter); however this walkway is not reflected on the landscape plan, nor are the landscape improvements that were referenced in the response letter. 3 r, The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the primary facade shall be the most highly designed facade. The primary facades along North Fort Harrision Avenue (parking garage) and Laura Street are inconsistent with the referenced elements to be found on primary facades. Additional and/or improved architectural treatments are necessary to achieve compliance with the Plan in regard to the above. 10/13/05: The north facade of the Theatre Building (facing Laura Street) has not been revised in a manner consistent with the opposite facade. It appears unchanged from the previous submittal. 4. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that primary facades shall include three articulated architectural parts: a base, middle and cap. The development proposals primary facades along North Fort Harrision Avenue and Laura Street do not achieve compliance with this item and will need to be revised. 10/13/05: The north facade of the Theatre Building (facing Laura Street) has not been revised in a manner consistent with the opposite facade. It appears unchanged from the previous submittal. 5. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that it is appropriate to provide shutters and/or canvas awnings sized to match the corresponding window openings. It is recommended that awnings consistent with those proposed along Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue are provided along Laura Street and Fort Harrison Avenue. 10/13/05: The north facade of the Theatre Building (facing Laura Street) has not been revised to be consistent with the above. Engineering Conditions: 1. Fire Department Connections (F.D.C.'s) shall be located a minimum of 15 feet from the face of any building on site and not within a street right-of-way. 10/10/05 - ALL THREE PROPOSED FDC'S ARE WITHIN 15- FEET OF A BUILDING. TWO FDCS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE LAURA STREET ROW AND ONE FDC IS LOCATED WITHIN THE OSCEOLA AVENUE ROW. Y'O'U" vleevl_ f1 2. F.D.C.'s shall be located no further than 40 feet from a Fire Hydrant Assembly. 10/10/05 - PROPOSED FDCS ARE GREATER THAN 40-FEET FROM A FHA. 3. Fire Hydrant Assembly shall be located on same side of the street as the F.D.C. served by the F.H.A. 10/10/05 - THE FDC PROPOSED FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF LAURA STREET DOES NOT SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. 4. Submit complete application for vacation of the alley right-of-way. Proposed vacation of existing alley shall not be reviewed by the City Council prior to approval of the FLD case by the Community Development Board. ILI %V f'-"' • • (Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773). 10/10/05 - NOT MET - ALL REQUIRED LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. J5. Ramp to second floor parking and entrance into ground level parking lot is potentially a major conflict point. Provide information as to how this will function with out a significant conflict when office workers, movie-goers and other users of the parking lots are exiting at the same time (stop sign, stop bar, sped bump, warning lights, traffic signal light. etc.) 10110105 - CIVIL PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT THIS CONFLICT POINT. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NOW INCLUDE A STOP BAR FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE FIRST FLOOR PARKING. THIS MEASURE ALONE IS NOT SUFFICIENT. SEE PARKING SYSTEMS COMMENTS 6. Indicate on the Utility Plan which water taps service each component of the development. 10110105 - NOT CLEARLY ADDRESSED. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 7. Compensation to the City of Clearwater to remove 6 metered parking spaces on the south side of Laura Street will be required. Contact Parking Facilities Manager, Tracy Bruch at (727) 562-4771. 10/13/05 - CITY ORDINANCE REQUIRES THAT THE CITY BE COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF METERED PARKING. AT THIS LOCATION THE FEE WOULD BE $1092 PER SPACE. IN LIEU OF THIS FEE, SIX OF THE PUBLIC PARKING SPACES IN GARAGE COULD BE DESIGNATED AS REPLACEMENT SPACES AND CITY COST FOR THE PARKING ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. 8. NOTE: Additional comments may be necessary based on the responses to conditions. Environmental Conditions: In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 10110105 - REVISED SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT PROVIDE DETAILS OF AN OIL AND GREASE SEPERATOR. -o o?- 0-4-5 7 Stormwater Conditions: .?ww?F •J?rJD?1?? ?'(l ?'?.Ih¢Rrst. wru,'ro P/i5P-?.?E 1. Show how post-development runoff is directed to stormwater vault. 10/10/05 - NOTE ADDED, HOWEVER IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW STORMWATER FROM OFFICE/MOVIE COMPLEX WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE VAULT. Traffic Conditions: .?- ????? ->, ?? P?? "t'o 'dam'- ?a11?JG? • - L The entrance gate along Fort Harrison has the potential to cause queuing of vehicles or stacking on the public right-of way during p.m. Peak hours. During the pm peak, the submitted traffic study indicates 81 vph southbound turning right into the proposed garage, 121 vph northbound turning left into the proposed garage, 254 vph exiting the garage and 700 vph or greater in the northbound and southbound lanes of Fort Harrison. Please provide necessary mitigation to relieve traffic congestion and queing on the public right-of-way. 10/10/05 - COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH REGARDING A RIGHT TURN/DECEL LANE. 2. The slope of the ramp from (7sceola Avenue is steep, are there any precautions to avoid pedestrian or vehicular conflicts when motorist(s) are exiting the ramp? If not please design. 10/10/05 - TRANSITION SLOPES, STOP BAR, STOP ON PAVEMENT AND FLASHING LIGHTS ADDED. IN ADDITION, PROVIDE AUTOMATIC GATE ARM TO FORCE VEHICLES EXITING GARAGE TO STOP. 3. Show a scaled WB-40 truck maneuvering in and out of loading zone. 10/10/05 NOT ADDRESSED • • 4. Show roadway width dimension on Laura Street which must be approved by the City's Fire Department for fire truck access. 10/10/05 - LAURA STREET WIDTH IS SHOWN AS 22.5'. FIRE DEPT. TYPICALLY REQUIRES 24-FEET FOR TWO-WAY TRAFFIC.If wFfVP_D \4I U_ TW 5. Show 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 10/10/05 - NOT ADDRESSED 6. Indicate the type(s) of traffic control devices that will be provided for vehicles exiting access ramp and entrance to first floor parking (stop sign, stop bar, speed bump, warning lights, traffic signal light, etc.). 10/10/05 - CIVIL PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT THIS CONFLICT POINT. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NOW INCLUDE A STOP BAR FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE FIRST FLOOR PARKING. THIS MEASURE ALONE IS NOT SUFFICIENT. 11 T?t' vetm t-C 7. Middle lane shall be bi-directional to respond to anticipated peak traffic volume demand. 10110105 - CIVIL PLANS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. -Ta, `Pr 8. Show location of ticket dispensing machine. Location must be forty feet (minimum) away from back edge of sidewalk. 10110105 - MET - HOWEVER, CIVIL PLANS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. -rfl 9 j Parking Systems Conditions: J 1. 360 Public parking spaces owned and operated by City; 235 public spaces owned and operated by Developer. Should be one operator for all public parking. There would be no way to differentiate who parked where. 10/12/05 - Office tenant parking needs a separate gate access system within the structure to ensure the public does not access these spaces. J 2. Agreement (6.04.a) states public parking condos on level 1 & 2. Plans show a total of 278 public parking spaces on level 1 & 2. Where is the City's public parking located? 10/12/05 - The City does not tow vehicles for parking in the wrong spaces. See response #1 above. 3. Conflict point @ ramp on level 1 and access to level 1 parking. 10/10/05 - CIVIL PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT THIS CONFLICT POINT. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NOW INCLUDE A STOP BAR FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE FIRST FLOOR PARKING. THIS MEASURE ALONE IS NOT SUFFICIENT. 10/12/05 - Need to address slowing down vehicles on the ramp to exit. Additional pavement marking on ramp (i.e., "SLOW"). Overhead Caution signs / flasher to slow vehicles down on ramp. Flasher tripped when vehicles are exiting from ground floor parking. Possibly speed bumps. 4. Insufficient queuing area to enter facility. 10110105 - CIVIL PLANS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 10/12/05 - OK; however, need raised islands separating lanes of traffic. H/C spaces on level 1 at entrance area. What is their destination? No elevator on Ft.. Harrison side of property indicates Acqua is not the primary destination. Better location elsewhere? building. 10/10/05 - MET - TWO OF FOUR HANDICAP SPACES WERE RELOCATED ADJACENT AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE REMAINING TWO SPACES ARE PROVIDED NEAR THE STREET AS COMPONENT OF PUBLIC--PARKING. C PARKING. 10/12/05 - The previous plans showed 6 H/C spaces on the ground floor. Now there ar 5. ? J 6. No mention of an access control system leading from the public parking to the private residential parking. 10110105 - SEE APPLICANT RESPONSE. PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL PARKING SEPERATED FROM PUBLIC PARKING BY WALLS ON FOURTH LEVEL. 10/12/05 - Private entrance on Osceola Ave. needs a gate access system to prevent the public from entering. Both entrance and exit lanes need the access control system. Would like to know the slope of the ramp. 0 0 1 7. Column placement on stall lines near rear of stall. Very difficult to park resulting in damage to vehicles & difficulty opening vehicle doors. Appears column placement is for residential tower above garage and not ideal placement for garage. Explore engineering of column placement to reduce or eliminate the number of columns in stalls. 10/12/05 - Column placement still appears to be in the rear section of the parking stalls (adjacent to stall lines). Presents operational problems for vehicles attempting to park, open doors and possible damage to vehicles. 8. Garage Management office space (20 x 20) with a view of entrance / exit area. Space shown does NOT provide the visibility required for management. 10/12/05 - Office space needs to be in front of garage near the entrance / exit (adjacent to Fire Pump room). Offices need to have handicap accessible restrooms for staff - not the general public. Are public restrooms being shown in garage? J 9. Will City be responsible for any condo maintenance fees for the parking spaces? 10/12/05 - What expenses will // the costs cover? J 10. Fiber optic capability to link facility operation back to MSB. 10/12/05 - OK, with 2 separate 2" conduits. 111. Handicap accessible islands for cashiering function. Islands must be ramped for cashiers in wheelchairs. 10/10/05 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. 10/12/05 - 6' wide / islands with cashier booths that are handicap accessible. r 12. Cashier booth should be located at Exit - not entrance lane. 10110105 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. 13. Cashier booth for center island needed. Garage large enough to support 2 cashiers during busy periods. 10/10/05 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. .? 14. Center lane can be reversible - needs to be shown. When in operation center lane restricted to left turns only and primary exit restricted to right turns only. 10110105 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. TURN RESTRICTIONS NOT SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 15. Railing to keep pedestrians from walking out of stairwell in NE corner directly into entrance lane. 10/10/05 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. 10/12/05 - Stairwell door swinging open to public sidewalk is a safety concern. 1 5 October 6, 200 Mr. Robert Tefft O ' Planner III CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. Myrtle Ave., #210 ' Clearwater, FL 33758 PLANN RE: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland St. ' DRC Response Dear Mr. Tefft: ORiGAAL OCT 0 6 200 :?'r CSC Listed below are our responses to the Development Review meeting held on September 29, 2005. The original DRC questions/comments are shown first, and each is immediately followed by the appropriate response. General Engineering: 1. 1. Fire Department Connections (F.D.C.'s) shall be located a minimum of 15 feet from the face of any building on site and not within a street right-of-way. Response: Acknowledged. See Revised Sheet C3.1. 2. F.D.C.'s shall be located no further than 40 feet from a Fire Hydrant Assembly. Response: Acknowledged. See Revised Sheet C3.1. 3. Fire Hydrant Assembly shall be located on same side of the street as the F.D.C. served by the F.H.A. Response: Acknowledged. See Revised Sheet C3.1. 4. Submit complete application for vacation of the alley right-of-way. Proposed vacation of existing alley shall not be reviewed by the City Council prior to approval of the FLD case by the Community Development Board. (Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773). Response: The original application for vacation of the alley right-of-way was submitted to engineering on the same day the application for the flexible development was submitted. Each bound package contained a photo copy of the application. We are again enclosing copies of the application which now includes letters of "no objection" from Progress Energy, Knology and Verizon. 5. Handicapped parking spaces shall be relocated to be near elevators and designed so that movement by handicapped individuals into vehicular use areas is not required to access building. Page 1 of 14 0 * ORIGINAL Response: Two Handicapped parking spaces located at the Ft. Harrison entrance to the parking garage will be moved to the Osceola St pedestrian entrance to allow more direct handicapped access. See Revised Sheet C2.1 and Revised Sheet A-101 for relocated handicap spaces. ' 6. Ramp to second floor parking and entrance into ground level parking lot is potentially a major conflict point. Provide information as to how this will function with out a significant conflict when office workers, movie-goers and other users of the parking lots are exiting at the same time. ' Response: The intersection has now been revised to incorporate clear control of movements through it by utilizing stop signs and stop bars much like those used to control traffic at typical roadway intersections. See Revised Sheet A-101. ' 7. Indicate on the Utility Plan which water taps service each component of the development. ' Response: The locations for domestic water taps leading to each major development component are now identified clearly on the plans as requested. Please see Revised Sheet C3.1. ' 8. NOTE: Additional comments may be necessary based on the responses to conditions. ' All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the City. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). ' Response: Acknowledged. See Note on Revised Sheet C2.1. 2. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Florida D.O.T.. Response: Acknowledged. Right-of-way permit to be obtained by FDOT prior to building permit. 3. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) ' Response: Acknowledged. See Note on Revised Sheet C2.1. ' 4. Compensation to the City of Clearwater to remove 6 metered parking spaces on the south side of Laura Street will be required. Contact Parking Facilities Manager, Tracy Bruch at (727) 562-4771. Response: We acknowledge this comment and offer two options for the City's ' consideration. Clarifying the reasoning for the current design, the Laura Street right-of- way is being upgraded to include new streetscaping and pedestrian friendly crossings and retail facades. Avoiding street parking in this area was a goal related to improving the ' pedestrian experience. We have no space to compensate for lost street parking in the design, thus a decision must be made on the City's behalf to give priority to parking or pedestrian streetscape. Option 1 is to allow the design to remain as previously submitted. ' Option 2 is to reintroduce metered parking at the same quantity stipulated abo D r-- Page 2 of 14 OCT06200J u R I C"P'?^r?p I r e°kL. developer's preference is to utilize Option 1, which is why we haven't changed the plans. However, we are also willing to utilize Option 2 if the City prefers. 5. Show location of required grease trap for restaurant. Response: The locations of required grease traps for restaurants have not yet been determined. However, they will be shown on the Construction Documents when submitted for building permit, thus allowing the City to provide feedback and approval capacity at that time. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1. Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. Response: Underground vault is being proposed in lieu of a surface treatment pond. The proposed redevelopment project is located in the downtown corridor. Due to site constraints and buildings allowed to be placed at a 0' setback, there is no room for a surface treatment pond. Along with the required landscaping, this is impractical for the site. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. Response: See Revised Sheet C3.1 for oil and grease separator detail. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Response: See Revised Sheet CM for vault cross-section and detail. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Response: Vault maintenance schedule has been included herewith as an attachment to the stormwater narrative. Fire: 1. Crosswalk canopies are required to be 14' minimum height. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Crosswalk Canopy located at Laura Street entrance to parking garage connecting to Retail/Theater entrance will have 14 feet height clearance below canopy construction. See Revised Sheet A-101. 2. FDC are required to be 15' from building. Acknowledge and show on plan PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged. See Revised Sheet C3.1. Page 3 of 14 111111 OCT 06 2005 PL0.N IN 7i & Q E! i1,0PN?TN1;, pl, 9 0 ORIGINAL 4. 5. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please, acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response: This building is designed to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, and meets the requirements for High Rise Structure which include but are not limited to Fire Code items such as Fire Pump and generator for electric pump(s), fully automatic sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, fire-fighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized stairwells, stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. See Revised Sheet A-101. Show location of Fire Command room in highrise. PRIOR TO CDB Response: A location of Fire Command Room is identified on the revised Residential highrise Lobby Plan. See Revised Sheet A-101. A life safety evaluation in accordance with NFPA 101,12.4.1 is required. Acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. A Life Safety Evaluation in accordance with NFPA 101,12.4.1 will be provided at building permit submittal. See Revised Sheet A- 101. 6. An automatic wet standpipe with fire pump and emergency generator for backup power for pump and elevator will be required in theater building. Acknowledge and show locations on plan PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. An automatic wet standpipe with fire pump and emergency generator for back-up power for pump and elevator will be provided in Retail/Theater Building. See Revised Sheet A-101. 7. Must meet the requirements of NFPA 40 "Cellulose Nitrate Film" in theatre building. Acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB Response: Acknowledged. "Cellulose Nitrate Film" is not being used in the theatre building. Plans show pavers to be used as road surfaces. Must be engineered to withstand an 80,000 lb weight load. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB O R D U PD r M - Page 4 of 14 OCT 0 6 200E PLANNING 8, OEV?10PMENI,E?VC 0 0 ORIGINAL Response: Pavers will be able withstand 80,000 lbs for emergency vehicles. See Note on Revised Sheet 2.1. 9. Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT Response: Acknowledged. The project will have fire flow calculations performed by a Fire Protection Engineer prior to permit. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: Q C C? 11'1 L?- j No Comments . Landscaping: OCT 0 6 200r No Comments t ' PI..ANNIN(j', OE',; r ,.Ot-rv Parks and Recreation: I tfztt w + 1. No issues - project in CRA. Stormwater: 1. 1) Correct acreage error in the stormwater narrative. Response: See attached corrected narrative for stormwater. 2) Show how post-development runoff is directed to stormwater vault. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Response: See Revised Sheet C3.1 for runoff to vault. Prior to issuance of a building permit the following conditions are to be met: 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit for the proposed project. Response: Acknowledged. SWFWMD permit or exemption will be obtained prior to building permit. 2) As this site will tie into the proposed Cleveland Streetscape project, the applicant is to pay for the upgrade of the proposed 18" line to a 36" line from structure S-136 to S-135. Response: Acknowledged. See Note on Revised Sheet C3.1. 3) The 36" city owned storm line proposed on Osceola Ave is to have street inlets to pick up road runoff from Osceola. At Laura St. there is to be an inlet on each corner and at other locations as directed by the City Engineer based on more detailed information on Osceola Ave. No pipe run of 36" storm pipe is to be longer than 400 L.F. without an access point. Page 5 of 14 • 0MGNI'i_- OCToszoZ)J Response: Acknowledged. See Note on Revised Sheet C3.1. ! tYie;Cr?t' ` '3 ?; US 4) All proposed work in the Osceola Ave R.O.W. is to be accomplished by issuance of a city R.O.W permit issued by the Engineering Dept. Response: Acknowledged. Right-of-Way permit to be obtained by City of Clearwater Engineering Dept. See Note on Revised Sheet 3.1. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1. Disabled spaces must be located near elevator or accessible entrance. Response: Parking Spaces for the Disabled are located at each Public Elevator and accessible Entrance to the Building. Disabled spaces have been distributed to provide some near the elevator in addition to other accessible entrances. See Revised Sheet A- 101 through A-104. 2. Parking garage must comply with vertical clear height for disabled parking space(s). The minimum vertical clear height must be 8 feet 2 inches (8'2") per Florida Building Code Chapter 11. Response: The Parking Garage allows minimum 8'-2" vertical clear height at each parking level as per the Florida Building Code, Chapter 11. See Revised Sheet A-101. 3. The entrance gate along Fort Harrison has the potential to cause queuing of vehicles or stacking on the public right-of-way during p.m. peak hours. During the pm peak, the submitted traffic study indicates 81 vph southbound turning right into the proposed garage, 121 vph northbound turning left into the proposed garage, 254 vph exiting the garage and 700 vph or greater in the northbound and southbound lanes of Fort Harrison. Please provide necessary mitigation to relieve traffic congestion and queuing on the public right-of-way. Response: The Entrance Gates to the public Parking Garage have been revised to allow more than 40 feet of queuing space for stocking of vehicles. See Revised Sheet A-101. 4. The slope of the ramp from Osceola Avenue is steep, are there any precautions to avoid pedestrian or vehicular conflicts when motorist(s) are exiting the ramp? If not, please design. Response: The ramp for the Residential Parking, exiting to Osceola Street will require transition ramps and a full stop at the sidewalk before proceeding. Additionally our Parking Consultant proposes a flashing signal to alert pedestrians of cars exiting. Transition ramps with lesser slopes have been provided at the foot of the ramp. See Revised Sheet A-101. 5. Show a scaled WB-40 truck maneuvering in and out of loading zone. Response: See Sheet Revised C2.1 for maneuverability of WB-40 truck in and out of loading zones. Page 6 of 14 'i _ tiB r rp-p?\ I G 1 N u 0 L ' 6. Show roadway width dimension on Laura Street which must be approved by the City's Fire Department for the fire truck access. ' Response: See Revised Sheet C2.1 for dimension of Laura Street. t 7. Show 20' X 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). ' Response: All site visibility triangles have been located. See Revised Sheet C2.1. 8. Indicate the type(s) of traffic control devices that will be provided for vehicles exiting access ramp and entrance to first floor parking (stop sign, stop bar, speed bump, warning lights, ' traffic signal light, etc.). Response: The vehicles exiting the First Level Public parking will have to observe a full stop at a stop sign and corresponding stop bar to yield to vehicles entering the First Level parking or vehicles exiting the Second Level parking by way of the ramp. See Revised Sheet A-101. 9. Middle lane shall be bi-directional to respond to anticipated peak traffic volume demand. ' Response: The Middle access lane has been revised to be bi-directional to respond to anticipated peak traffic volume. See Revised Sheet A-101. ' 10. Show location of ticket dispensing machine. Location must be forty feet (minimum) away from back edge of sidewalk. Response: The location of the ticket dispensing machine for the Public Parking has ' been revised to a distance of over 40 feet from the back edge of the sidewalk. See Revised Sheet A-101. ' 11. Ramps on Sheets A105 and A106 appear to be labeled incorrectly. Response: The Ramps on Revised Sheets A105 and A106 have been labeled correctly. ' General Note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. ' Response: Acknowledging general note. Specific details are being addressed within the CRA Development Agreement relating to this topic. ' PARKING SYSTEMS COMMENTS 1. 360 Public parking spaces owned and operated by City; 235 public spaces owned and operated by Developer. Should be one operator for all public parking. There would be no way to differentiate who parked where. ' Response: We agree that one operator should be assigned under a joint agreement between City and Developer. Developer envisions that differentiation and secure access ' for office tenants would take place via traditional electronic access cards and gates. The general public would take a ticket (time stamped) upon entry and pay attendant or an electronic payment center on the way out. D ' OCT 0 6 2005 ' Page 7 of 14 PLANN;NG & DE 1A-10PM'i i -; CS 2. 3. 4. 5. E • cRi c NA t. Agreement (6.04.a) states public parking condos on level 1 & 2. Plans show a total of 278 public parking spaces on level 1 & 2. Where is the City's public parking located? Response: The City's public parking occurs on levels 1, 2 and 3, plus all but the NE corner of level 4 during non-office hours. Office tenants will be provided with 200 "Reserved Parking" stalls during office hours. Reserved stalls will bear signage warning of towing of cars without a reserved parking sticker during prescribed office hours (6:OOAM - 6:OOPM). Conflict point @ ramp on level 1 and access level 1 parking. Response: The vehicles exiting the First Level Public parking will have to observe a full stop at a stop sign to yield to vehicles entering the First Level parking or vehicles exiting the Second Level parking by way of the ramp. With the provision of a stop bar for level 1 vehicles and clear view of the down bound traffic the potential for conflict is minimized. See Revised Sheet A-101. Insufficient queuing area to enter facility. Response: The control gates have been relocated beyond 40' from the back from the sidewalk as requested. See Revised Sheet A-101. H/C spaces on level 1 at entrance area. What is their destination? No elevator on Ft. Harrison side of property indicates Acqua is not the primary destination. Better location elsewhere? Response: Two of the four handicap parking spaces shown at the Ft Harrison entrance have been relocated to the Osceola St. entrance, as shown on the Revised Plans. See Revised Sheet A-101. No mention of an access control system leading from the public parking to the private residential parking. Response: There is no direct access between the Public Parking and the Private Residential Parking. On Level 4, there is a separation wall between the two parking areas shown on the Revised Plans. See Revised Sheet A-104. Column placement on stall lines near rear of stall. Very difficult to park resulting in damage to vehicles & difficulty opening vehicle doors. Appears column placement is for residential tower above garage and not ideal placement for garage. Explore engineering of column placement to reduce or eliminate the number of columns in stalls. Response: The above comments are incorrect. All parking stalls have been designed so that the structure (columns) are set back in the parking space from the aisle to allow easy vehicle turning from the aisle into the parking space. In order to accommodate the typical parking garage structural grid, a structural transfer floor on the 8th level has been designed to convert the residential tower structural grid to the parking garage grid. See Revised Sheets A-101 through A-107. Garage Management office space (20 X 20) with a view of entrance/exit area-, does NOT provide the visibility required for management. 11 D Page 8 of 14 L - ?[ U LJ N OCT 0 6 200 PLANNING $ DEVEIOPMENf (A Iv tip ri r c nrerco R G N r Response: The Garage Management Office is revised and moved forward. Adjacent ' parking has been re-arranged to provide improved visual control for Management. See Revised Sheet A-101. ' 9. Operation of garage including but not limited to: hours of operation, fee schedule, financial pro-formas. ' Response: It is the intent of the CRA Development Agreement to address the comments. above. At present there is insufficient data available for the Developer to respond to the specific details noted above. Such details will be outlined in broad form prior to the CDB meeting. 10. Will City be responsible for any condo maintenance.fees for the parking spaces? ' Response: Yes, each ownership entity must bear its respective maintenance allocation, just as it would in any other owned garage. ' 11. Fiber optic capability to link facility operation back to MSB. Response: The developer will provide (2) 2" conduits for the City's future fiber optics ' up to and including a pull box at the Acqua property line. The developer will not be responsible for infrastructure installations beyond the defined limits of work. See Revised Sheet A-101. ' 12. Handicap accessible islands for cashiering function. Islands must be ramped for cashiers in wheelchairs. ' Response: Islands are ramped for h/c accessibility. See Revised Sheet C2.1 and Revised Sheet A-101. 13. Cashier booth should be located at Exit - not entrance lane. Response: There will be a Cashier Booth for each of the Exit Lanes (2 total). See ' Revised Sheet A-101. 14. Cashier booth for center island needed. Garage large enough to support 2 cashiers during ' busy periods. Response: A second cashier booth has been added to accommodate the need for a second cashier. See Revised Sheet A-101. 15. Center lane can be reversible - needs to be shown. When in operation center lane restricted to left turns only and primarily exit restricted to right turns only. Response: Center lane is reversible. Turning restrictions are indicated as requested. See Revised Sheet C2.1 and Revised Sheet A-101. ' 16. Railing to keep pedestrians from walking out of stairwell in NE corner directly into entrance lane. ED Page 9 of 14 UU OCT O 6 209-r 1 PLANNING & OEvrLpPm! 0 • oRI GI N A L". Response: The NE corner stairwell has been revised to allow access only to the sidewalk. See Revised Sheet A-101. Planning: 1. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that parking lots are to be designed in such a way that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. How is light glare (i.e. vehicle headlights and lights within the garage) being restricted from encroaching upon the neighboring properties and rights-of-way? Consider the provision of louvered panels within the openings along the exterior of the parking garage or some other means by which this issue can be resolved. Response: The Garage Exterior Walls have been designed with Architectural Pre-Cast Panels with openings for natural ventilation where possible. The openings are covered with a decorative grill-work which will visually screen the parking function and provide visual interest and scale for pedestrians, both at street level and on upper garage levels. Lighting glare will be controlled by selection of low-glare lighting fixtures which implement shielding where cut-offs to neighboring properties or streets is desired. Where necessary to prevent car headlight nuisance, a solid backing panel will be attached to the decorative grilles. Where abutting adjacent properties the garage walls are solid pre-cast infill to accommodate fire code requirements and prevent unwanted parking noise or lighting. Mechanical ventilation will also be used to exhaust fumes from the parking garage. See Revised Sheets A-302 and A-303. 2. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the ground floors of parking ' garages accessory to the principal use shall have at least 75 percent of the primary fagade occupied by the principal use(s)/features or other complimentary use. While that portion of the development north of Laura Street has primary facades along North Fort Harrison Avenue, Laura Street and North Osceola Avenue, it may not meet the above requirement. ' Provide calculations for the combined percentage of the facades as per the above. Response: The revised Plans show that at least 75% of each of the principal facades (Osceola St., Laura St., Ft. Harrison St.) is occupied by the principal use(s)/features and therefore the revised design meets this requirement. See Revised Sheet A-101. ' 3. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the upper floors of all parking garages shall be designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. Clarify how the upper floors have been designed to meet this ' requirement. Response: The garage openings are fitted with decorative grilles and solid backers (up to headlight elevation) in order to visually screen the vehicles from view. See Revised Sheet A-302 and A-303. 4. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that mechanical equipment, wireless ' communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. Clearly indicate the locations of all mechanical equipment, wireless ' communication facilities, etc. and the means by which they will be screened. Response: To correspond to the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan, we have ' designed screening solutions as follows: L5 M M O T M D ? ' Page 10 of 14 OCT 0 6 200 PI ANNiNr,,R_. nFvizt PmFN'i : `vn ORIGINAL ' a. Mechanical equipment for the Parking and Condo Building will consist of cooling towers and chillers mounted on the 7th Parking Level with an opening in the slab above on the 8th Level to accommodate venting. This will minimize the exposure of the equipment for the residents and have no visual impact on the Public Right of Ways below at street level or from adjacent buildings. See Revised Sheet A-302. ' b. Mechanical Equipment for the Retail/Theater Building will be located on the roofs of the structure, screened and set back from the perimeter so that visual impact is minimized from the Residential Building and unseen from the Public Right of Ways and surrounding buildings. See Revised Sheet A-151. c. The Loading and Service areas for both parcels of the Project are located at the ' East end of Laura St., across from each other to create an efficient and visually controllable service area. Each will include Electrical Transformers, Emergency Generators, Electrical Equipment Rooms, and Trash Compactors in addition to the Truck Unloading Bays. Doors for each loading area will conceal service docks and trash facilities from plain view. See Revised Sheet A-101. d. Wireless Communications equipment will be located on the roof of the mechanical equipment room for the elevator tower, with architectural screening for the equipment on all sides. No equipment will be visible either up close or at a distance. See Revised Sheet A-151. 5. With regard to the northern portion of the development, the building is to be set back approximately 10 feet from the north property line. Please clarify why the building has been set back in such a manner and what is proposed to occur in this space. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that seperations between buildings shall provide adequate useable space as an alley or open space complaint with these Guidelines. If such a ' useable space can not be accomplished in this subject area, then it is strongly recommended that the building be constructed to the north property line. Response: The approximately 8 to 10 foot wide setback on the north side of the building results from building the parking garage structure as efficiently as possible. The setback is shown to be treated with a 6' sidewalk, landscaping and lighting to provide a ' passageway between Ft. Harrison and Osceola Streets. However, the developer remains open to the installation of single story walls to "barricade" the passage against the shared property line if necessary. See Revised Sheet A-101. ' 6. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that "the size and proportions of new development should be related to the scale of nearby buildings. Even if much larger than its neighbors in terms of square footage, the building should maintain the same scale and rhythm as the existing buildings". Please provide a response that specifically addresses how the development proposal is consistent with the above requirement of the Plan. ' Response: As evidenced by the 3D color renderings and the B/W elevations, each primary facade on Cleveland, Osceola, Fort Harrison and Laura Streets responds to the relationship and scale of nearby buildings, and enhances the facades with consistent ' rhythms and high quality materials complementary to surrounding buildings. Significant design differentiators have been incorporated into the street facades in order to minimize the presence and scale of the residential tower at the pedestrian level. D ' Page 11 of 14 OCT 0 6 200r- PLANNING J& OE'J;?:I.OprnF i..•. . rv n, u.e rr?vJ1+S • eCRIGiNAL 7. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that "new development and redevelopment should respect the vertical height of existing or approved adjacent buildings and contribute to a pedestrian scale". Please provide a response as to how the development proposal is consistent with the above referenced requirement of the Plan. Response: The pedestrian experience associated with this development is precisely in keeping with the Design Guidelines and the objectives defined in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. By creating a retail base with inviting storefronts, covered walks, and architectural detailing and canopies the scale becomes human, and the presence of the residential tower mass is almost imperceptible. We invite you to imagine walking along any of the adjacent streets to experience this first hand. 8. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that buildings that visually overpower adjacent buildings are inappropriate. Please provide a response (perhaps in relations to the above comment pertaining to height) that addresses how the development proposal does not overpower adjacent buildings. Response: Contrary to the above point, the Redevelopment Plan specifically defines the Downtown Core as the City's most desired location for the highest density of development, and further stipulates that no height limit exists. As the same time it requires stepbacks in facades to mitigate height and mass, a consistent scale and rhyme on Cleveland Street to respect the historical facades, expressions of a base, middle and top, and sensitivities to pedestrian scale, all of which have been accomplished within the design. Further, the City has recently approved similarly sized developments (eg. Water's Edge - less than one block away) so the notion that this development "visually overpowers" others would be incorrect. Instead, it is becoming part of the fabric of a well-planned and revitalized downtown skyline. 9. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that buildings along Cleveland Street taller than the predominant height of other buildings on the project's block shall step back at the predominant height. Provide a revised elevation (black/white line drawing) that shows the proposed building in relation to the existing adjacent buildings along Cleveland Street. Response: Elevation Drawing A202 for the "Downtown Plaza" has been revised to recognize the existing adjacent building to the East on Cleveland Street by stepping back the Theater facade approximately 6 feet and creating a terrace at that level. To the West, the existing bank building has been shown re-clad and its primary fagade ' referenced in the proposed Theater Building which steps back at that approximate height to retain the prominence of the existing bank building on the corner of Cleveland and Osceola Streets. r 10. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the primary fagade shall be the most highly designed fagade. The primary facades along North Fort Harrison Avenue (parking garage) and Laura Street are inconsistent with the referenced elements to be found ' on primary facades. Additional and/or improved architectural treatments are necessary to achieve compliance with the Plan in regard to the above. ' Response: The Building Elevations of the primary facades along North Fort Harrison and Laura Street have been revised to correspond to the primary facades on Osceola and Cleveland Street and include the design elements and detailing established on those ' primary facades. (See Revised Color Renderings.) O nn D ' Page 12 of 14 0 C T 0 6 2ME, LfIL-9 L?Ua L. W 00M GIN A-tL OCT052AME PLANNING ° OP,! -t 11. mown & n-Redevelopment Plan states that primary facades shall include three articulated architectural parts: a base, middle and cap. The development proposals primary facades along North Forth Harrison Avenue and Laura Street do not achieve compliance with this item and will need to be revised. Response: The primary facades along North Fort Harrison and Laura Street have been revised to correspond to the Project's primary facade on Osceola Street which articulates a base, middle and cap in contrasting architectural pre-cast color and pattern with a granite base and a pre-cast cap forming the cornice element. (See revised color renderings.) 12. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that it is appropriate to provide shutters and/or canvas awnings sized to match the corresponding window openings. It is recommended that awnings consistent with those proposed along Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue are provided along Laura Street and Fort Harrison Avenue. Response: The building elevations along Laura and Fort Harrison Avenue now have ' awnings similar to those proposed on Cleveland Street and Osceola as shown on the revised color renderings. 13. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that first floor awnings should be placed no higher than the midpoint between the top of the first story window and the bottom of the second story windowsill. Clarify the height of the ceiling for the first floor of the AmSouth building as the awnings would appear to exceed the thresholds set above. Response: The first floor awnings for the office building have been revised to meet the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. They will be installed so the top of the awning begins between the top of the first story window and the sill of the second story window. (See revised color rendering.) 14. Clarify the height of the precast parapet on the northern building. Response: The height of the pre-cast parapet at the top of the podium is 8616". See Revised Sheet A-201. 15. Clarify the height of the Mech. P.H. roof on the northern building. Response: The height of the Mech. P.H. Roof of the Residential Tower (Northern Building) is 400' above ground level. See Revised Sheets A-201 through A-204. 16. The southern building has multiple roof heights as per the architectural elevations; however the roof plan depicts a flat roof (one height). Please clarify. Response: The Roof Plan for the Southern Building has been corrected to show the multiple roof levels. See Revised Sheet A-151. 17. Clarify the heights of the parapets along the southern building. Response: The parapet heights along the Southern Building are 4 feet above the roof. The Elevation tags on Revised Sheets A-201 through A-204 have been corrected. Page 13 of 14 r I NA1 1 18. The response to General Applicability Criterion #1 does not discuss how the proposed ' development is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage density or character of the adjacent properties. Provide a revised response which addresses the criterion. 1 Response: The Project Narrative has been updated to respond to the above comments. (See enclosed Revised Project Narrative.) 19. General Applicability Criterion #6 refers to how the development proposal minimizes adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory effects and hours of operation impacts. The response provided does not deal with any of the above elements. Response: The Project Narrative has been updated to respond to the above comments. (See enclosed Revised Project Narrative.) 1 20. The responses provided for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria #7 and #8 do not address how the criteria are being met, only that they are. Please provide revised responses. 1 Response: The Project Narrative has been updated to respond to the above comments. (See enclosed Revised Project Narrative.) Other: No Comments If there are any additional comments or concerns, please contact our office. Sincerely, Mark Rieker Applicant Aqua and The Downtown Plaza Page 14 of 14 Northside Eyr auy S 9?. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: October 5, 2005 To: Mr. Mark Rieker 1020 N. Orlando Ave, Suite 150 Maitland, FL 32751 ORIGINAL Reference: C.W. Acqua at the Downtown Plaza NES Proj# 543 We Transmit: Enclosed Under Separate Cover X Originals Mail UPS Overnight X Prints X Pick-Up Hand Delivered Addendum Shop drawings Specifications Applications Per Your Request For Your Review & Comment Floppy Disk X For Your Use For Your Approval For Your Files For Your Information Copies Date Description 20 Stormwater Report, 1 Signed and Sealed 1 Civil Site Data Plans (3 sheets), Signed and Sealed Please contact us at (727) 443-2869 should you have any questions or comments. By: / Angel Haines, Exec. Admin. Analyst Copies To: FILE N. Pelzer 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 - 446 • 8036 CIVIL • / LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • U?f ? 11 OCT 0 6 z00s Architects ca 1 . VC, A R C H I T E C T U R E I N T E R I O R D E S I G N TAMPA 100 E. Madison Street Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33602 Phone: 813.549.1900 Fax: 813.549.1901 AA0002981 SPECIALIZED MARKETS Commercial Corporate Hospitality Education Retail Industrial Health Care Entertainment WEB SITE www.bakerbarriosarchitects.com Transmittal To: City of Clearwater Planning Dept From: Walter Pestrak Address: 100 S Myrtle Ave, #210 Clearwater, FL 33756 Attn: Mr. Wayne Wells, Planner III Date: 10/06/05 Re: FLD2005-08084-400 Cleveland St., DRC Response Project No: 030340.01 We are sending you: ? Attached ? Via courier X Drawings ? Shop Drawings ? Computer Disk(s) / CD 0 - ORIGINAL s OCT 0 61Q01 Project Name: C.W. Acqua and the Downtown Plaza ? Under separate cover via ? Samples ? Specifications COPIES DATE SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION 15 SETS 10/06/05 24X36 SIZE Rev. DRC Submission to Clearwater 15 SETS 10/06/05 11 X1 7 SIZE Rev. DRC Submission to Clearwater These are transmitted as checked below: ? For approval ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit copies X For your use ? Approved as noted ? Submit copies ? As requested ? Returned for corrections ? For review and comment ? Other: ? For Bids Due: ? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS: For your use and distribution COPY TO: Ma Rieker & Assoc* t s SIGNED If enclosure is not as noted, please notify us at once • 0 3.40 pm Case Number: FLD2005-08084 -- 400 CLEVELAND ST . Owner(s): 400 Cleveland 406 S Brand Blvd Glendale, Ca 91204 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Mark Rieker 1020 N Orlando Avenue St 150 Maitland, Fl 32751 TELEPHONE: 321-206-4123, FAX: 407-628-2105, E-MAIL: No Email Location: 4.06 total acres located at the northeast and southeast corner of Osceola Avenue and Laura Street. Atlas Page: 286B Zoning District: D, Downtown Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development with 245 attached dwelling units, 98,500 square feet of retail/movie theater, and 87,800 square feet of existing office, an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 18 feet for architectural embellishments, and an increase to the permitted density from 209 dwelling units to 245 dwelling units by using 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. Proposed Use: Mixed use Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 54 1. Fire Department Connections (F.D.C.'s) shall be located a minimum of 15 feet from the face of any building on site and not within a street right-of-way. 2. F.D.C.'s shall be located no further than 40 feet from a Fire Hydrant Assembly. 3. Fire Hydrant Assembly shall be located on same side of the street as the F.D.C. served by the F.H.A. 4. Submit complete application for vacation of the alley right-of-way. Proposed vacation of existing alley shall not be reviewed by the City Council prior to approval of the FLD case by the Community Development Board. (Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773). 5. Handicapped parking spaces shall be relocated to be near elevators and designed so that movement by handicapped individuals into vehicular use areas is not required to access building. 6. Ramp to second floor parking and entrance into ground level parking lot is potentially a major conflict point. Provide information as to how this will function with out a significant conflict when office workers, movie-goers and other users of the parking lots are exiting at the same time. 7. Indicate on the Utility Plan which water taps service each component of the development. 8. NOTE: Additional comments may be necessary based on the responses to conditions. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1. A separate right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 2. Need a copy of an approved right-of-way permit from Florida D.O.T.. 3. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.) 4. Compensation to the City of Clearwater to remove 6 metered parking spaces on the south side of Laura Street will be required. Contact Parking Facilites Manager, Tracy Bruch at (727) 562-4771. 5. Show location of required grease trap for restaurant. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Fire: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 55 • 1 . Crosswalk canopies are required to be 14' minimum hieght. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 2. FDC are required to be 15' from building. Acknowledge and show on plan PRIOR TO CDB. 3. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Fire Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Show location of Fire Command room in highrise. PRIOR TO CDB 5. A life safety evaluation in accordance with NFPA 101,12.4.1 is required. Acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB 6. An automatic wet standpipe with fire pump and emergency generator for backup power for pump and elevator will be required in theater building. Acknowledge and show locations on plan PRIOR TO CDB 7. Must meet the requirements of NFPA 40 "Cellulose Nitrate Film" in theater building. Acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB 8 . Plans show pavers to be used as road sufaces. Must be engineered to withstand an 80,000 lb wieght load. Acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB 9. Provide Fire Flow Calculations by a FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER to assure adequate water supply for project. Acknowledge intent PRIOR TO CDB. Calculations due PRIOR TO PERMIT Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . No issues - project in CRA. Stormwater: 1 . 1) Correct acreage error in the stormwater narrative. 2) Show how post-development runoff is directed to stormwater vault. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Prior to issuance of a building permit the following conditions are to be met: 1) Provide a copy of the approved SWFWMD permit for the proposed project. 2) As this site will tie into the proposed Clevland Streescape project, the applicant is to pay for the upgrade of the proposed 18" line to a 36" line from structure S-136 to S-135. 3) The 36" city owned storm line proposed on Osceola Ave is to have street inlets to pick up road runoff from Osceola. At Laura St. there is to be an inlet on each comer and at other locaions as directed by the City Engineer based on more detailed information on Osceola Ave. No pipe run of 36" storm pipe is to be longer than 400 L.F. without an access point. 4) All proposed work in the Osceola Ave. r.o.w. is to be accomplished by issuance of a city r.o.w. permit issued by the Engineering Dept. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 56 Disabled spaces must be located near elevator or accessible entrance. 2. Parking garage must comply with vertical clear height for disabled parking space(s). The minimum vertical clear height must be 8 feet 2 inches (8'2") per Florida Building Code Chapter 11. 3. The entrance gate has the potential to cause queuing of vehicles or stacking along Fort Harrison Avenue during p.m. peak hours especially on Fridays or movie block busters. 4. Provide a deceleration lane along Fort Harrison Avenue for the gated entrance per City's Comprehensive Plan - Policy 6.2. Site design shall provide a deceleration lane or lanes to enter the site without impeding traffic flow for roadway. 5. The slope of the ramp from Osceola Avenue is steep, are there any precautions to avoid pedestrain or vehicular conflicts when motorist(s) are exiting the ramp? If not please design. 6. Show a scaled WB-40 truck manuevering in and out of loading zone. 7. Show roadway width dimension on Laura Street which must be approved by the City's Fire Department for fire truck access. 8. Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 9. Indicate the type(s) of traffic control devices that will be provided for vehicles exiting access ramp and entrance to first floor parking (stop sign, stop bar, speed bump, warning lights, traffic signal light, etc.). 10. Middle lane shall be bi-directional to respond to anticipated peak traffic volume demand. 11. Show location of ticket dispensing machine. Location must be forty feet (40') away from back edge of sidewalk. 12. Ramps on Sheets A105 and A106 appear to be labeled incorrectly. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule. PARKING SYSTEMS COMMENTS 1. 360 Public parking spaces owned and operated by City; 235 public spaces owned and operated by Developer. Should be one operator for all public parking. There would be no way to differentiate who parked where. 2. Agreement (6.04.a) states public parking condos on level 1 & 2. Plans show a total of 278 public parking spaces on level 1 & 2. Where is the City's public parking located? 3. Conflict point @ ramp on level 1 and access to level 1 parking. 4. Insufficient queuing area to enter facility. 5. H/C spaces on level 1 at entrance area. What is their destination? No elevator on Ft.. Harrison side of property indicates Acqua is not the primary destination. Better location elsewhere? 6. No mention of an access control system leading from the public parking to the private residential parking. 7. Column placement on stall lines near rear of stall. Very difficult to park resulting in damage to vehicles & difficulty opening vehicle doors. Appears column placement is for residential tower above garage and not ideal placement for garage. Explore engineering of column placement to reduce or eliminate the number of columns in stalls. 8. Garage Management office space (20 x 20) with a view of entrance / exit area. Space shown does NOT provide the visibility required for management. 9. Operation of garage including but not limited to: hours of operation, fee schedule, financial pro-formas. 10.Condo maint. fees? I l.Fiber optic capability to link facility operation back to MSB. 12.Handicap accessible islands for cashiering function. Islands must be ramped for cashiers in wheelchairs. 13.Cashier booth should be located at Exit - not entrance lane. 14.Cashier booth for center island needed. Garage large enough to support 2 cashiers during busy periods. 15.Center lane can be reversible - needs to be shown. When in operation center lane restricted to left turns only and primary exit restricted to right turns only. 16.Railing to keep pedestrians from walking out of stairwell in NE corner directly into entrance lane. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 57 • • All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 58 • 1 . 'The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that parking lots are to be designed in such a way that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesireable views. How is light glare (i.e. vehicle headlights and lights within the garage) being restricted from encroaching upon the neighboring properties and rights-of-way? Consider the provision of louvered panels within the openings along the exterior of the parking garage or some other means by which this issue can be resolved. 2. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the ground floors of parking garages accessory to the principal use shall have at least 75 percent of the primary facade occupied by the principal use(s)/features or other complimentary use. While that portion of the development north of Laura Street has primary facades along North Fort Harrison Avenue, Laura Street and North Osceola Avenue, it may not meet the above requirement. Provide calculations for the combined percentage of the facades as per the above. 3. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the upper floors of all parking garages shall be designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. Clarify how the upper floors have been designed to meet this requirement. 4. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, loading and service areas shall be integrated into the design of the site, located in the most unobtrusive location possible and buffered and screened appropriately. Clearly indicate the locations of all mechanical equipment, wireless communication facilities, etc. and the means by which they will be screened. 5 . With regard to the northern portion of the development, the building is to be set back approximately 10 feet from the north property line. Please clarify why the building has been set back in such a manner and what is proposed to occur in this space. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that seperations between buildings shall provide adequate useable space such as an alley or open space compliant with these Guidelines. If such a useable space can not be accomplished in this subject area, then it is strongly recommended that the building be constructed to the north property line. 6. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that "the size and proportions of new development should be related to the scale of nearby buildings. Even if much larger than its neighbors in terms of square footage, the building should maintain the same scale and rhythm as the existing buildings". Please provide a response that specifically addresses how the development proposal is consistent with the above requirement of the Plan. 7. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that "new development and redevelopment should respect the vertical height of existing or approved adjacent buildings and contribute to a pedestrian scale". Please provide a response as to how the development proposal is consistent with the above referenced requirement of the Plan. 8. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that buildings that visually overpower adjacent buildings are inappropriate. Please provide a response (perhaps in relations to the above comment pertaining to height) that addresses how the development proposal does not overpower adjacent buildings. 9. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that buildings along Cleveland Street taller than the predominant height of other buildings on the project's block shall step back at the predominant height. Provide a revised elevation (black/white line drawing) that shows the proposed building in relation to the existing adjacent buildings along Cleveland Street. 10. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that the primary facade shall be the most highly designed facade. The primary facades along North Fort Harrision Avenue (parking garage) and Laura Street are inconsistent with the referenced elements to be found on primary facades. Additional and/or improved architectural treatments are necessary to achieve compliance with the Plan in regard to the above. 11 . The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that primary facades shall include three articulated architectural parts: a base, middle and cap. The development proposals primary facades along North Fort Harrision Avenue and Laura Street do not achieve compliance with this item and will need to be revised. 12. The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that it is appropriate to provide shutters and/or canvas awnings sized to match the corresponding window openings. It is recommended that awnings consistent with those proposed along Cleveland Street and Osceola Avenue are provided along Laura Street and Fort Harrison Avenue. Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 59 9 • 13 . The Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan states that first floor awnings should be placed no higher than the midpoint between the top of the first story window and the bottom of the second story windowsill. Clarify the height of the ceiling for the first floor of the AmSouth building as the awnings would appear to exceed the thresholds set above. 14. Clarify the height of the precast parapet on the northern building. 15. Clarify the height of the Mech. P.H. roof on the northern building. 16. The southern building has multiple roof heights as per the architectural elevations; however the roof plan depicts a flat roof (one height). Please clarify. 17. Clarify the heights of the parapets along the southern building. 18. The response to General Applicability Criterion #1 does not discuss how the proposed development is in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density or character of the adjacent properties. Provide a revised response which addresses the criterion. 19. General Applicability Criterion #6 refers to how the development proposal minimizes adverse visual, acoustic and olfactory effects and hours of operation impacts. The response provided does not deal with any of the above elements. 20. The responses provided for Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 and #8 do not address how the criteria are being met, only that they are. Please provide revised responses. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda -Thursday, September 29, 2005 - Page 60 • 0 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 6, 2005 Mr. Mark Rieker 1020 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 150 Maitland, FL 32751 Re: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street - Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Rieker: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-08084. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on September 29, 2005. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft a,myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBr.R How HAMILTON, COUNCII.MFMUER ® CARLIiN A. PI:TERSIiN, COUNCII.MEMBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA:rivF ACTION EMPI.OYI:R" • • CITY OF CLEARWATER L Cie, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° arwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE ~ CLEARWAT ER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAx: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: September 6, 2005 Mark Rieker, (407) 628-2105 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2005-08084 / 400 Cleveland Street Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: "Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.teffta,myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.mvclearwater.com ** i ' Sep. 06 2005 10:04AM YOUR LOGO CityO£Clearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 914076282105 Sep.06 10:03AM 01'19 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-600-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 30, 2005 Mr. Mark Rieker 1020 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 150 Maitland, FL 32751 Re: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Rieker: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-08084. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. Pursuant to Section B of the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application, provide the street addresses of all of the parcels involved in the development proposal. 2. Pursuant to Section B of the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application, provide the parcel numbers for all of the parcels involved in the development proposal. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, September 6, 2005. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefftomyclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMF.MBER ® CARLEN A. PI TERSEN, COUNCILNIEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE. ACTION EMPLOYER" • Aug. 30 2005 12:01PM YOUR LOGO CityOPClearwaater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 914076282105 Aug.30 12:00PM 01'06 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). i CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE Clearwater `- CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: To: From: Re: August 30, 2005 Mark Rieker, (407) 628-2105 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III FLD2005-08084 / 400 Cleveland Street Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftamyclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.rrmyclearwater.com ** 0 0 Clayton, Gina From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:58 PM To: Akin, Pam; Clayton, Gina; Irwin, Rod Cc: Brumback, Garry; Campos, Geraldine; Arasteh, Mahshid Subject: RE: Acqua We can possible adjust the condition section to state streetscape to be done per plans or otherwise provided for pursuant to separate agreement. CDB will see that streetscape will be accomplished but the DO will recognize that it may be accomplished in another manner. mld Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, FL 727-562-4561 myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Akin, Pam Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:48 PM To: Clayton, Gina; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry; Campos, Geraldine; Arasteh, Mahshid Subject: RE: Acqua I believe that we are very clear that we want the City to do Osceola to achieve a unified appearance. Rod? -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:42 PM To: Akin, Pam; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry Subject: RE: Acqua Importance: High The streetscaping is shown primarily on the landscape plan. They are also showing improvements along Laura Street. They way the condition is drafted could be problematic if Osceola is not done by then. Maybe we should let the developer construct and we pay them back? [They are showing improvements in Ft. Harrison, Laura, Osceola and Ft. Harrison along these ROWs in order to qualify for the public amenities incentives pool). -----Original Message----- From: Akin, Pam Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:05 PM To: Clayton, Gina; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry Subject: RE: Acqua Gina, is streetscaping shown on the site plan? The City anticipates the Developer doing Fort Harrison and the City doing both Cleveland and Osceola, with the Developer paying a pro rata share of Osceola. Will that cause a problem with 14? What about roadway improvements on Fort Harrison? -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:55 PM To: Akin, Pam; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry Subject: FW: aco • Importance: High Below please find our conditions for the Acqua project. Please let me know if these are sufficient for your needs. We will be sending you the staff report within approximately 15 minutes. Our CDB packets are going out first thing in the morning. I would appreciate any comments you might have. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Tefft, Robert Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:53 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: acqua Conditions of Approval: 1. That all nonresidential uses proposed to be located on site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the storefront windows are revised to consist of bulkheads and transoms to be consistent with the architectural style and the City's Downtown Design Guidelines; 12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 15, 2006); 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within three years of issuance of the first building permit; 14. That all improvements be constructed in a single phase, or alternatively that the southern building (theatre) and requisite parking, including any and all public parking, along with any streetscaping adjacent thereto, be constructed as the first phase of the development; 15. That the Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the exterior renovation of the existing AmSouth building prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the northern building; and 16. That any dwelling units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not built shall be returned to the Pool. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 • • Clayton, Gina From: Akin, Pam Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:05 PM To: Clayton, Gina; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry Subject: RE: Acqua Gina, is streetscaping shown on the site plan? The City anticipates the Developer doing Fort Harrison and the City doing both Cleveland and Osceola, with the Developer paying a pro rata share of Osceola. Will that cause a problem with 14? What about roadway improvements on Fort Harrison? -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:55 PM To: Akin, Pam; Irwin, Rod Cc: Delk, Michael; Brumback, Garry Subject: FW: acqua Importance: High Below please find our conditions for the Acqua project. Please let me know if these are sufficient for your needs. We will be sending you the staff report within approximately 15 minutes. Our CDB packets are going out first thing in the morning. I would appreciate any comments you might have. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Tefftf Robert Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:53 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: acqua Conditions of Approval: 1. That all nonresidential uses proposed to be located on site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the storefront windows are revised to consist of bulkheads and transoms to be consistent with the architectural style and the City's Downtown Design Guidelines; 12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 15, 2006); 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within three years of issuance of the first building permit; 14. That all improvements be cons9ted in a single phase, or alternatively that southern building (theatre) and requisite parking, including any and all public parking, along with any streetscaping adjacent thereto, be constructed as the first phase of the development; 15. That the Certificate of Occupancy is issued for the exterior renovation of the existing AmSouth building prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy for the northern building; and 16. That any dwelling units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not built shall be returned to the Pool. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Planning Department City of Clearwater Tel: (727) 562-4539 Fax: (727) 562-4865 Tefft, Robert From: Rice, Scott Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 8:21 AM To: Tefft, Robert Subject: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Robert, Engineering has completed review of the resubmittal for the subject application and updated Permit Plan. Several issues remain outstanding. The items highlighted in bold below require further attention before this project can be scheduled for CDB: ENGINEERING 1. Fire Department Connections (F.D.C.'s) shall be located a minimum of 15 feet from the face of any building on site and not within a street right-of-way. 10110105 - ALL THREE PROPOSED FDC'S ARE WITHIN 15- FEET OF A BUILDING. TWO FDCS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE LAURA STREET ROW AND ONE FDC IS LOCATED WITHIN THE OSCEOLA AVENUE ROW. 2. F.D.C.'s shall be located no further than 40 feet from a Fire Hydrant Assembly. 10110105 - PROPOSED FDCS ARE GREATER THAN 40-FEET FROM A FHA. 3. Fire Hydrant Assembly shall be located on same side of the street as the F.D.C. served by the F.H.A. 10110105 - THE FDC PROPOSED FOR THE NORTH SIDE OF LAURA STREET DOES NOT STASFY THIS REQUIREMENT. 4. Submit complete application for vacation of the alley right-of-way. Proposed vacation of existing alley shall not be reviewed by the City Council prior to approval of the FLD case by the Community Development Board. (Contact Steve Doherty (727) 562-4773).10/10/05 - NOT MET - ALL REQUIRED LETTERS OF NO OBJECTION HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. 6. Ramp to second floor parking and entrance into ground level parking lot is potentially a major conflict point. Provide information as to how this will function with out a significant conflict when office workers, movie- goers and other users of the parking lots are exiting at the same time (stop sign, stop bar, sped bump, warning lights, traffic signal light. etc.) 10/10/05 - CIVIL PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT THIS CONFLICT POINT. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NOW INCLUDE A STOP BAR FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE FIRST FLOOR PARKING. THIS MEASURE ALONE IS NOT SUFFICIENT. SEE PARKING SYSTEMS COMMENTS 7. Indicate on the Utility Plan which water taps service each component of the development. 10110105 - NOT CLEARLY ADDRESSED. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 8. NOTE: Additional comments may be necessary based on the responses to conditions. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 4. Compensation to the City of Clearwater to remove 6 metered parking spaces on the south side of Laura Street will be required. Contact Parking Facilities Manager, Tracy Bruch at (727) 562-4771. 10/13/05 - CITY ORDINANCE REQUIRES THAT THE CITY BE COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF METERED PARKING. AT THIS LOCATION THE FEE WOULD BE $1092 PER SPACE. IN LIEU OF THIS FEE, SIX OF THE PUBLIC PARKING SPACES IN GARAGE COULD BE DESIGNATED AS REPLACEMENT SPACES AND CITY COST FOR THE PARKING ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. • i ENVIRONMENTAL • 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 10/10/05 - REVISED SHEET C3.1 DOES NOT PROVIDE DETAILS OF AN OIL AND GREASE SEPERATOR. STORMWATER 2) Show how post-development runoff is directed to stormwater vault. 10110105 - NOTE ADDED, HOWEVER IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW STORMWATER FROM OFFICE/MOVIE COMPLEX WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE VAULT. TRAFFIC 3. The entrance gate along Fort Harrison has the potential to cause queuing of vehicles or stacking on the public right-of way during p.m. peak hours. During the pm peak, the submitted traffic study indicates 81 vph southbound turning right into the proposed garage, 121 vph northbound turning left into the proposed garage, 254 vph exiting the garage and 700 vph or greater in the northbound and southbound lanes of Fort Harrison. Please provide necessary mitigation to relieve traffic congestion and queing on the public right-of-way. 10/10/05 - COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH REGARDING A RIGHT TURN/DECEL LANE. 4. The slope of the ramp from Osceola Avenue is steep, are there any precautions to avoid pedestrian or vehicular conflicts when motorist(s) are exiting the ramp? If not please design. 10110105 - TRANSITION SLOPES, STOP BAR, STOP ON PAVEMENT AND FLASHING LIGHTS ADDED. IN ADDITION, PROVIDE AUTOMATIC GATE ARM TO FORCE VEHICLES EXITING GARAGE TO STOP. 5. Show a scaled WB-40 truck maneuvering in and out of loading zone. 10/10/05 NOT ADDRESSED 6. Show roadway width dimension on Laura Street which must be approved by the City's Fire Department for fire truck access. 10/10/05 - LAURA STREET WIDTH IS SHOWN AS 22.5'. FIRE DEPT. TYPICALLY REQUIRES 24-FEET FOR TWO-WAY TRAFFIC. 7. Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways and access points. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 10/10/05 - NOT ADDRESSED 8. Indicate the type(s) of traffic control devices that will be provided for vehicles exiting access ramp and entrance to first floor parking (stop sign, stop bar, speed bump, warning lights, traffic signal light, etc.). 10/10/05 - CIVIL PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT THIS CONFLICT POINT. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NOW INCLUDE A STOP BAR FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE FIRST FLOOR PARKING. THIS MEASURE ALONE IS NOT SUFFICIENT. 9. Middle lane shall be bi-directional to respond to anticipated peak traffic volume demand. 10110105 - CIVIL PLANS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 10. Show location of ticket dispensing machine. Location must be forty feet (minimum) away from back edge of sidewalk. 10/10/05 - MET - HOWEVER, CIVIL PLANS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. PARKING SYSTEMS COMMENTS 1. 360 Public parking spaces owned and operated by City; 235 public spaces owned and operated by Developer. Should be one operator for all pub,Oarking. There would be no way to di, 0'entiate who parked where. 10/12/05 - Office tenant parking needs a separate gate access system within the structure to ensure the public does not access these spaces. 2. Agreement (6.04.a) states public parking condos on level 1 & 2. Plans show a total of 278 public parking spaces on level 1 & 2. Where is the City's public parking located? 10/12/05 - The City does not tow vehicles for parking in the wrong spaces. See response #1 above. 3. Conflict point @ ramp on level 1 and access to level 1 parking. 10110105 - CIVIL PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT THIS CONFLICT POINT. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS NOW INCLUDE A STOP BAR FOR VEHICLES EXITING THE FIRST FLOOR PARKING. THIS MEASURE ALONE IS NOT SUFFICIENT. 10/12/05 - Need to address slowing down vehicles on the ramp to exit. Additional pavement marking on ramp (i.e., "SLOW"). Overhead Caution signs / flasher to slow vehicles down on ramp. Flasher tripped when vehicles are exiting from ground floor parking. Possibly speed bumps. 4. Insufficient queuing area to enter facility. 10110105 - CIVIL PLANS NOT CONSISTENT WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 10/12/05 - OK; however, need raised islands separating lanes of traffic. 5. H/C spaces on level 1 at entrance area. What is their destination? No elevator on Ft.. Harrison side of property indicates Acqua is not the primary destination. Better location elsewhere? building. 10110105 - MET - TWO OF FOUR HANDICAP SPACES WERE RELOCATED ADJACENT AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE. THE REMAINING TWO SPACES ARE PROVIDED NEAR THE STREET AS COMPONENT OF PUBLIC PARKING. 10/12/05 - The previous plans showed 6 H/C spaces on the ground floor. Now there are 5. 6. No mention of an access control system leading from the public parking to the private residential parking. 10/10/05 - SEE APPLICANT RESPONSE. PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL PARKING SEPERATED FROM PUBLIC PARKING BY WALLS ON FOURTH LEVEL. 10/12/05 - Private entrance on Osceola Ave. needs a gate access system to prevent the public from entering. Both entrance and exit lanes need the access control system. Would like to know the slope of the ramp. 7. Column placement on stall lines near rear of stall. Very difficult to park resulting in damage to vehicles & difficulty opening vehicle doors. Appears column placement is for residential tower above garage and not ideal placement for garage. Explore engineering of column placement to reduce or eliminate the number of columns in stalls. 10/12/05 - Column placement still appears to be in the rear section of the parking stalls (adjacent to stall lines). Presents operational problems for vehicles attempting to park, open doors and possible damage to vehicles. 8. Garage Management office space (20 x 20) with a view of entrance / exit area. Space shown does NOT provide the visibility required for management. 10/12/05 - Office space needs to be in front of garage near the entrance / exit (adjacent to Fire Pump room). Offices need to have handicap accessible restrooms for staff - not the general public. Are public restrooms being shown in garage? l0.Will City be responsible for any condo maintenance fees for the parking spaces? 10/12/05 - What expenses will the costs cover? 11.Fiber optic capability to link facility operation back to MSB. 10/12/05 - OK, with 2 separate 2" conduits. 12.Handicap accessible islands for cashiering function. Islands must be ramped for cashiers in wheelchairs. 10/10/05 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. 10/12/05 - 6' wide islands with cashier booths that are handicap accessible. 13.Cashier booth should be located at Exit - not entrance lane. 10110105 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. 14.Cashier booth for center island needed. Garage large enough to support 2 cashiers during busy periods. 10110105 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. 15.Center lane can be reversible - needs to be shown. When in operation center lane restricted to left turns only and primary exit restricted to right turns only. 10/10/05 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. TURN RESTRICTIONS NOT SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. 16.Railing to keep pedestrians from walking out of stairwell in NE corner directly into entrance lane. 10/10/05 - CIVIL AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. 10/12/05 - Stairwell door swinging 3 open to public sidewalk is a safetooncern. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 E scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Sep i19 2005 3:11PM RIEKER RSSOCIRTES 40765509 f ammo val & InAtutional 2088 VVetWq Place be?ra6opment MaWment ovielb, FL 32765 tkiimstruction Sent ces Ph. 407.386.8806 Ptojeci:M1tat?agement Fat 407.386.5609 FACSDMZ Date: Thursday, September 29, 2005 Project 1 A¢gna & The Downtown Plaza To: N ichael Delk Subject: FLD2005-09094-400 Cleveland St Firm: City of Clearwater From: Mark Rieker Fax: 727.562-4865 Phone: (mobile) 321.287.5677 Number of Pages ® Urgent ? Please Review/Respond (including cover sheet): 2 ! CoMa?rrrs: Michael, Please see the enclosed letter. Thanks for your assistance. Mark p.l D E D SEP 2'g 2005 U PLANNING & I?EVELOPIOENT SERVICES C17- . rl. EARWATe -, 'Ibis meaty is itiftmikd solely forthe nuftuloal or eAtity to wbich it is addressed, and may cumbi n information flit is pdvDapd, ouofida*W and 4MMpt Sam disdomm omrdQ applic" kw. If you am not the attended recoien& you are bsraby notified that say clsmanrinatioo, ifisnibution cr oapy mg of0a eommunkstion is skwayp[akiibited_ If you have received this iwm®niadion its error, please notify us anmediatdy, and kindly Sep Z4 2005 3:11PM RI ER & ASSOCIATES ommwdai & Institutional ,0ev9flenttAarrdgsipent ?o?sRudion:Servioes ??rge?t Rrtanagsment September 29, 2005 Mr_ Ukhael Dells Planning ])bcdor CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Ckarvuater, FL 33758 i Re: Acgua fit The Downtown Plaza Case No. FLD2W - ONON4 - 400 Clevelamd Sb+eet DearNfichad, 40 SG5509 p.2 Please be advised that I have received the DRC counimm fuan Robert Ted and have been notified by your staff of the DRC w eeting today at 3:40 p.m., however I an muble to appear personally today due to illness. I apologize for this, but wanted you t D know that we will be well reputed. Our entire desiga team d= mdlu lwg the architect, civil , and landscape a ndutect as well as our aftmey will be at dw meeting. Andrea Zdman, of Fowler % tes our legal counsel, will represent me in my absence. Tbank you very much far your eoosiderat ion in this matter_ Siubcerely, PJEK R&AssoaATFs,Xi- Mark Ri&w Pre dal Coma l DsvebpmVConslnaonAgect Management Services 2688 Wembley Place, 0&-do, FL 32765 ph: 407.366.8866 fax: 407.3661609 • / am <Q0 ?' 1? 0 ?, ; y y CD CARL TGN C? S 3 E g IV ENGMAN p? ?¢?l TANGERINE til CS ENGMAN F Sf ?e LA PaM k s SLUR O 3T i PALM BWfF S! Daa PALM 13LuPP sr § $ ?tNG JURGENS Sf ? ?pp?3 ,? 2 Ol rdA CEDAR ST MEFTO oO 0 P AlME7 M?ROD? ?D L7 ST NICI ? o Ei 0 - SEMINOLE St 19, E: ca UE ° I -? ?? MAPLE EIIJRI MAPLE ? LEE ST PLAZA ST GEORGIA 0?1u- KART Si = a JACKSON PROJECT z ? s S ST SITE "IN. ??F? ?9§0 DL?W Si S.R. 580 N W a ?a 1-oa= 4owr ? ? MOVE ?i ''T IALiN l? N.E r--1 El F-1 El= ??? S? ??? CIEVEUWD ? 3T PAfO( € ST a PIEL?E ST ??? ? Z1E PIERCE ST PIERCE a 0 ?????c? FRANKLIN ? - ? ? O ST ? COURT ST 1 ? Z ? h r GWLD Si ClR $ 3 a Luwc?r? 9 a F1 ?o o 0 0 (7ESINDf ROGERS ST fl RDGEfB 0 El RO? ? 10 ? ? O 8 TURNER A Sr fa wpwp ? E 3b NAQON) a Vl O H Nn,_ PINE p PINE ST PIN Q ? ?+E pT 8 PME 2 E! z W DRUID RD W DRUID RD D Location Map Owners: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Case: FLD2005-08084 Development, LLC; and Laura Street Development, LLC Site: 400 Cleveland Street Property 4.06 Size Acres : Atlas 2866 Page: PIN: 16/29/15/00000/120/0300 16/29/15/23814/000/0040 16/29/15/23814/000/0010 16/29/15/23814/000/0050 16/29/15/23814/000/0070 16/29/15/23814/000/0100 16/29/15/23814/000/0190 16/29/15/23814/000/0180 16/29/15/23814/000/0030 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Cleveland 400 - Acqua (D) - 11-15-05 - RT\Maps\Location Map.doc • • A - at •? AMW ? n J _ ' ¦ • f. ' • 4 I ' ?„ ., "A v ? i a to 10'r I AAA ' ? ?-• ? r ? r. 1 .. Jt 14 -Vo 41 'kit JIM S A" P ?$ - t t l _ A. Af, II a M. f' A lt - in ? 41 l=lt'l? S l' J A0 • ` , S • = t ? ? a ? ...wi . - • i 1. AL & L IU Aerial Map Owners: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Case: FLD2005-08084 Development, LLC; and Laura Street Development, LLC Site: 400 Cleveland Street Property 4.06 Size Acres : Atlas 2866 Page: PIN: 16/29/15/00000/120/0300 16/29/15/23814/000/0040 16/29/15/23814/000/0010 16/29/15/23814/000/0050 16/29/15/23814/000/0070 16/29/15/23814/000/0100 16/29/15/23814/000/0190 16/29/15/23814/000/0180 16/29/15/23814/000/0030 SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Cleveland 400 - Acqua (D) - 11-15-05 - RT\Maps\Aerial Map.doc i -' 123 ?Z 127 ----- ? 123 , ? 'r21 121 IJ'------- 118 I t,9 381 I W 1115 I 11, - 3s-' `-'?-- 107 g-------__j 105 10, V , N 2 D 1 r , 3P 33 6 1 Q 27 -- I Z 25 ' 22 Q 1 21 r y ? t Q 15 I = 7 Q 0 3 2 '-11V rf ? W u l - --- --- -- Q I _ N l I I Q 14 Z --- Q O n 20 - J O --------- ,15 CO) ' p --------- H i---------- 1,z ---- ----- i W 107 I tq 35 d -------am r-------------- -r I 281 I I I I ' I I I L---------------- --------------- °' NN N Na b ,tf of in ?n --- $ of I I, 124 Q I '1120 Q W '33 p I Q I CLEVELAND ST -0 22 Q `. 24 226 28 h h r a PARK ST Q ca f, -101 Zoning Map Owners: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Case: FLD2005-08084 Development, LLC; and Laura Street Develo ment, LLC Site: 400 Cleveland Street Property 4.06 Size Acres : Atlas 2866 Page: PIN: 16/29/15/00000/120/0300 16/29/15/23814/000/0040 16/29/15/23814/000/0010 16/29/15/23814/000/0050 16/29/15/23814/000/0070 16/29/15/23814/000/0100 16/29/15/23814/000/0190 16/29/15/23814/000/0180 16/29/15/23814/000/0030 zi: \manning Ueparrmenr\c U B\ritx (!W) Vending cases\Up for the next CDB\Cleveland 400 - Acqua (D) - 11-15-05 - RT\MapsVoning Map.doc • • r- ' ' ? ---' ; 123 12 12 127 I Governn Rental Use ; ----- ffice 123 _ ;z2 1 100 ; 121 ; ,f------- 118 71 i 120 p15 ]R etail & 38 I r W I 111 ffice I ?- 36 Q ti ? l-?L-J ----7 L ? 107 I-Z---I j I --------- 105 L I ? lot I W U t 1101 ' r 45 ' \ ------ j W 33 i 38 35 ? Convention Center 35 33 L-------- r--------------- I Q c? ? I W 28; Z ` v 27 ------------------------- 25 U 2 21 Restaurant , I - 18 ? Retail I j I 15 7 ---------- ---- - I I 1 1 L vo `v 5 3 I I I I ' N? him I I , I I g -- 0 ------------------- 2 CLEVELAND ST -_-___--T-----'I ?` O FJTn 1 ? O - f __ .. __ff -,ti-W --- ' 4?--__ _ I et 1, Reta & O fi Place pf Worship I W _ I W 1 I __ lei ' r Q 14 ------ J22 - I 20 W 40overn a tal Use ii ' W Q y ' PARK ST I 0 - r------ H r---------- 1 ~ 0 , I tot i l- ? ' Governmental Use2 _ L__-_ L ----- r------ I '. i ?j i I I I 1 I I I r I I ; ?lace o drshilp 8 ? ? ?? 1 1 I Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owners: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Case: FLD2005-08084 Development, LLC; and Laura Street Development, LLC Site: 400 Cleveland Street Property 4.06 Size Acres : Atlas 286B Page: PIN: 16/29/15/00000/120/0300 16/29/15/23814/000/0040 16/29/15/23814/000/0010 16/29/15/23814/000/0050 16/29/15/23814/000/0070 16/29/15/23814/000/0100 16/29/15/23814/000/0190 16/29/15/23814/000/0180 16/29/15/23814/000/0030 S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Cleveland 400 - Acqua (D) - 11-15-05- R7\Maps\Existing Uses Map.doc 0 0 DREW ST P ? n U !7 D 00000 ©B B CBD CBD Q Z 0 CBD h a? Q z ° Z z 11 B CBD C 13 13 CBD a ° J ° O ° n W V ? O Z CLEVELAND ST CBD g CBD CBD CBD CBD W o CBD CBD c ?q ti P ? Future Land Use Map Owners: 400 Cleveland, LLC; Mainstreet Clearwater Case: FLD2005-08084 Development, LLC; and Laura Street Development, LLC Site: 400 Cleveland Street Property 4.06 Size Acres : Atlas 2866 Page: PIN: 16/29/15/00000/120/0300 16/29/15/23814/000/0040 16/29/15/23814/000/0010 16/29/15/23814/000/0050 16/29/15/23814/000/0070 16/29/15/23814/000/0100 16/29/15/23814/000/0190 16/29/15/23814/000/0180 16/29/15/23814/000/0030 SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Cleveland 400 - Acqua (D) - 11-15-05- RT\Maps\Future Land Use Map.doc F I 9 Looking north from the subject property toward the abutting property. . '' d I Looking northwest across South Osceola Avenue toward adjacent property (Public Library). t Looking Southeast from Laura Street toward toward properties facing North Fort I larri son Avenue. .m1?r ¦ Looking northwest across the subject property toward the adjacent properties across North Osceola Avenue. 400 Cleveland Street, et al. FLD2005-08084 LJ Looking northeast 1iom Laura Street to properties that will abut the subject property. Looking northwest from Laura Street toward subject property. Engelhardt, Hammer & Aoiates City of Clearwater Land Development Code General Applicability Criteria 3-913.A CWAGa Code Criteria Analysis 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adiacent properties in which it is located. The proposed development will be in scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The City of Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan establishes an extensive list of guidelines for the Downtown Core area created to direct the development of property in this area that will match existing historical styles and blend in with the Downtown fabric. The developer has worked closely with the city to create a project that is in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood and achieves these ideals. The streetscapes are designed to be consistent with existing heights and styles that match the main street feel of Cleveland and Fort Harrison. The mid-rise retail and offices to the east and south will be mirrored by the new structure. Retail and active uses line these facades at ground level and architectural details provide excitement and character. The residential tower has been stepped back to allow for a gradual transition, but remains at a height that is compatible with existing buildings, recently approved developments and described character for this district. Properties to the west are the new library and Coachman Park along Osceola. The drop in bulk and height of this area offers a transition to the Harbor and from the density and intensity of the Downtown Core as a whole. The proposed development continues the pedestrian character to these public treasures. To the north is the Old Bay district. The proposed development maintains the corridor character styles desired to achieve the transition to this mixed-use neighborhood. The high-rise residential tower sets a new standard as a landmark and vision for new bay front residences encouraged in Old Bay. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adiacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development will encourage further investment in the area. Adjacent businesses will benefit from the theater and new retail uses which will enliven the whole area. The Downtown Core, and specifically the new library, will benefit greatly from the much needed new public parking garage. Page 1 of 3 Engelhardt, Hammer & A*iates CW Ac* Code Criteria Analysis 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will improve the quality of life for the neighborhood in terms of health and safety. The added entertainment and services will be of great benefit to the employees of downtown businesses. The liveliness of the new development will spur on activity, highlighting and encouraging spin-off use of area parks, library and waterfront. Increased Downtown population will make this area safer. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed development is designed with traffic issues in mind. No parking entrances are located on Cleveland Street to keep pedestrian uses on this main street. The decreased use of Cleveland due to the new Memorial Bridge also alleviates the increases in use proposed through the development. Recessed parking entrances allow for car stacking into the facilities. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The development character desired in the Downtown Core is described as having "the highest density for residential and hotel uses and the highest intensity for retail/commercial/ office uses. It is expected that the most intense development within the Downtown Core will occur in the center of the District defined as from Osceola Avenue east to Myrtle Avenue and from Drew Street south to Court Street. The Downtown Core shall be redeveloped as a pedestrian- friendly place achieved through a diversity of land uses, urban design and streetscape improvements." The proposed development offers this high intensity and dense urban landscape with a variety of active and entertaining uses. The design of the proposed buildings melds with the existing development in a way to keep this district feeling contiguous and yet exciting. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. This design of the proposed development matches the intensity of the surrounding district. The hours of operation will be similar to adjacent businesses. The new theater will help to create a nighttime character of an active city center. By locating the main active entrances along Cleveland and Fort Page 2of3 Engelhardt, Hammer & Aciates CW Apa Code Criteria Analysis Harrison, these areas become a focal point for the new activity. Good use of quality materials and impressive design will promote positive use of space and respect for the City fabric. Page 3of3 0 0 Commercial & Institutional Development Management Construction Services Project Management September 5, 2005 Mr. Robert Tefft Planner III CITY OF CLEARWATER 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33758 Re: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street (C W Acqua) Response to Letter of Incompleteness dated August 30, 2005 Dear Robert, This letter is in response to your above referenced correspondence, wherein it is noted that in order to complete our Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application, all street addresses and parcel numbers for all of the parcels involved in the development proposal need to be provided. Enclosed please find comprehensive parcel data and records for your information and use. In summary, the parcels are identified as follows: 1. 400 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-00000-120-0300. 2. 400 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0010. 3. 400 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0070. 4. 400 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0190. 5. 410 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0030. 6. 418 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0040. 7. 420 Cleveland Street, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0050. 8. Alleyway-no address, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0100. 9. 416 Laura Sheet, ID No. 16-29-15-23814-000-0180. Should you have any questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, RIEKER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark Rieker President Encl. Cc: Kevin Burke, Wiseman & Burke Andrea Zelman, Fowler White Commercial Development/Construction/Project Management Services 1020 N. Orlando Ave., Suite 150, Maitland, FL 32751 ph: 321.206.3399 fax: 407.628.2105 Pinellas Records Clerk of the suit Court Official Records Results Form KEN BURKE Oil CLERIC OF THE Clitcurr COURT PkMAM County, Florida Official Records Results Document images now available from January 1, 1997. Page 1 of 1 Records R nested Search Criteria From To Name Inst Book/P8 a lnst # 1/511987 8/9/2005 1400 CLEVELAND P Records in System: Oldest Date:11511987 Released Date: 81912005 EntryDate: 811112005 Request Processed: u Au 1113:27:10 EDT 2005, Displayed below, Page 1 with 4 Records: 1 thru 4 of 4 400 CLEVELAND LLC to 400 CLEVELAND LLC Link a e To/Fr Other Party inst Description File Date Book Page instr # m N 400 WESTMINSTER LT 1 ETC EARL CLEVELAND CAPITAL CO L C A & TATES SUB 3/11/2003 12591 1657 2003096543 LLC ETC 400 DECADE LT 1 ETC EARL CLEVELAND GULFCOAST DEED TATES SUB ETC 11/2003 12591 1487 2003096529 LLC OFFICE PARTNE 400 FIXTURES ETC CLEVELAND WESTMINSTER 1 LT 1 ETC EARL 3/11/2003 12591 1689 2003096545 LLC CAPITAL CO L C ST & TATES SUB ETC 400 ESTMINSTER LT 1 ETC EARL CLEVELAND MTG & TATES SUB 3/11/2003 12591 1553 2003096536 CAPITAL CO L C LLC ETC http://pubtitlet.co.pinellas.fl.uslofficiaheclofficial=IDMDAP,esWts2 jsp?documentQuery... 8/11/2005 Timothy G. Hains Arc---- 4501 Tamiami Trail Borth suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 This Instrument Was Prepared By: May Neese Ferd, &4 Quarles & Brady LLP 411 Bast Wisconsin Avenue Suite 2900 Milwaukee, WI 53202 - and After Recording B.D. Armstrong III, Esq. Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Boka4 Ruppel & Bums, P.A. 911 Chestnut Street P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 3$.00 :"?, $*.zM recording $57,400.00 doc stamps z .Y Property Appraiser Grantee's Tax ?. Identification No. Identification No. #16-29-15-00000-120-0300 #16-29-15-23814-000-0010 `#16-29-15-23814-000-0070 ` •. PAGES '7 #1 '29-15-23814-CM-0190 ACCT oR 9 rT .M CAS INN This Special FEES m F --"""DECADE GULi+CO PIC partnership, as to an REV 0'/o interest, having ??3188 ("Grantor") 9 ',K BAL. address of 406 Sod? G AMT ' i KMM F. DE H1MP QM OF TART PDOM MM, RIBA 03-u-M 15:53:09 V B 51 MIM Maff>??LpFCUA?9T! /0 /4?0g (??(.?f? MM 0064 MMIM 007 PCB 1 M.00 000 STAMP - DM9 3 0,400.00 r i 2 y W,.:• t 't 4. ' rte- z.•'.:` TOTAL: 0,433.00 CIEC( A11T.1EiiDEU: 0,433.00 : 0.00 BY OR W P rNE LRS cc R SK1 11258 3 Pa ' 141E MINIlium illill01vim WARRANTY DEED l y IIe?d, made the _R NY of UY1&,r CJh . 2003 by PARTNERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited e4-900% interest and JEFFREY KEIERLEBER, as to an undivided reskofN19 W24130 Riverwood Drive, Suite 100, Waukesha, WI WFLAND, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, having an Boulevard, Glendale, CA 91204 cGrantee'), Witnesietl`i°.' ,'that"Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable co 'oA-Ae receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargailis, s?r"aliens, reudses, releases, conveys and confirms unto Grantee, all that certain and-sii iatio, pkoperty in Pinellas County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached, eeto ridlincoxporated herein by reference (the "Property'), subject, however, to those matters Set t6ir Exhibit B attached hereto. `'•.Ta-M* +e and to Hold, the Property, subject to the aforesaid oncumbrances and other malei iintq Grantee in fee simple forever. `i '--,;,Aid Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of the Prd'perW, subject to the aforesaid encumbrances and other matters, in fee simple; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against. the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under said Grantor, but against none other. QBMKE\5349568.1 C? In Witness Whereof, Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name, by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, the day and year first-above written. Signed, sealed and delivered ,-? `: `,• P YNELLFIS COUNTY FLA. OFF.REC.8K 12881 PO 1488 in the presence of. '- -• . •.:., ; GRANTOR DECADE GbIMCbAST OFFICE PARTNERS LIMITED P"ARWERSHIP, as to an undivided 90°_/0 interest e 4 a 2 , By: *'IuXest nts of Clearwater, Inc., General Signature Print Name: W t Signature Print Name: 450- I Signature 4 b:. Print Name:..,..,,..1'of/m ter' !![- Signature Print Name: zlt--T,i ? STATE OF W1sio?e. COUNTY OF The for4o1'4grms by Jeffrey Kcieclr, `iac the generai,p= -? 16e limited part hid' Who a« N a ?•, r, ..? 'icy ?-qI_ ?. ', r 1b%? r :..:••'' tidy,-. Jeffrey V _ K ierle er, President , as to an undivided 10% interest «v truxnent was acknowledged before me this day of Ar1AYG1N, 2003 lividually, and as the President of JK Investments of Clearwater, Inc., Cade Gulfcoast Office Partners Limited Partnership, on behalf of said is personally known to me. - i tune At Print e NOTARY PUBLIC MY Commission Bq)ims;A-0 Kn? QBMKM5349S68.1 EXHIBIT A _ PINELLRS COUNTY FLM. A OFF , REC . SK 125S I Pp 1489 Legal Description L - - vyn:, i, Lots 1, 2, 7, 8, and 9, and the West 10 feet of Lot 18, and all ef:Lpiik-9, 20, and 21, of Earl and Tates Subdivision, a subdivision according to the RecorWfgakthe' recorded in Plat Book H-1, page 20 in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Flo i rJ LESS right-of-way for alley. AND Begin at the Northwest corner of Lot 21 of Earl aid Tiftes u?division, a subdivision according to the Record Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book A-1, pagel20 in the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and ran Northerly along the MR), _ Mdension of the West line of said Lot 21 a distance of 233.16 feet to an iron pipe, that T o"rif lj'e^i3 g 233.31 feet South of the North line of Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 15 Ea t, ln.Pigtllas County, Florida; thence Easterly 347.15 feet to an "X" cut in concrete on the W ast right-of-way line of North Fort Harrison Avenue; thence Southerly along the said West right-of-way line of North Fort Harrison Avenue a distance of 200.00 feet to an iron pin; )htqce Westerly 173.83 feet to an iron pin; thence Southerly 33.80 feet to a concrete monument; fi ience Westerly 13.47 feet to a 'W' in concrete; thence Westerly to the Point of Beginntn„j.,,,, A T ! < i 3 4 s i G }` c r= - QBMKM34M&I 0 FEB 20 206x1 10:13 FR 9-FF M - BMW LLP 941 434 4999 M 914i49?.0 66'7 12.015/m Also described as: PINEU.Rg CGtjNTy f i LR If" k 1 FF REC , 91K WMALLs X 11 PQ 1490 A tercel of leed•696e1 in partlem at $Gaflms 10. TewgwapsL?,seutA. R44=a is Cost. tiaeilos Cematy. Flsvide. Patel wars perttemlerty 4e66ribod !a talth'a4 Ssein at toe settlwost aer4or of 4ef f. alms. AW 'S,'?101VISION to reeardad is Pitt slosh IN-so hp 20 et the Petite Raterde of Plaeiti}-?titrFlorida. mo list $ #lie ppolaf of fetersodttes of Ike islet Right-mf-wy fine at•Oso si sho North sk live at Cleveland Aw liv sessrdies to sold CAROL. Alb 1'AT6'S d110D1VISION. sold pellet being itd9e0t'4rV. for 347.41 feat froia the 8"l ` of ',4araar of said EAN.L AND TA1E's SMOVISION toting the boats of beetlres o'er Ms ftptles): thosse HMVf4'3V9. stool ties lost fine of 1414 Lot 1. MLL + tj GMIVISICNp two octal said lKest Itllh*-st-fty 1144 of 00"Ma ftrest. ter f 110.14 sat is tea Northwest career of that eortols fesdowly described Is Off total Raat ds'1110 Palo, *mid the Poll* Records of Plastics Casty. Florldes those, $M*24':33 olds toe Norvil flea at sold Qertal* oreptrtf described In Official Rseafds el ;:1 4. Pose 50, far 100.ZS feet is the Nerttwaat soradr of void aartele prepirty4its lo¦d Is Orfleiat Records RoGk 744. Pale 543. sums holu a pole* ve the cost I" !it irt1Z. said Eldif..t. AND TATE'S SMIVISNCN: theses SOVIT04'N. slang said Eq I'Wuo cif Let 2. EAR' AND TATE'S s11BDIVISICN. for 154.79 feat to the Southeast career ate; said: Lot 2. seas belal o polat as sold (forth Rllhl-of-%I Itoo sf Clevalond Aveaaot t"irdY'1lOS'OROM71M. eleag the sovtk Ilot 41 sold Let R. lARI.L NO-TAM'S SMIVIS111N. 41841 toe Soutk fine of Said Let 1. F.ARLL AND TATE'S VADIVISIC14, raepastively. mom bolog raid North tlisiet-tt-weft Item of Cloratead Moans. for t00.1ll feet to the POINT CP; NNjfIG': (St10Nlf Ali meI ON for Cr ftIWUI M rer of 110a41rai O.QOIf tart (?} '"'wf' P11, /Ti WTHER ifiT143 A p0ast of 1404 0641M "j"dtan 0f Seat ian is. Tovesklp to isatb. Whale is East. Ptatlles Gedil: f'laridr.{ial?af ?er)i portivolertr described as tollowse fxx 1CE at ski' Iva t'ooroeo of Lot 1. EAM.I. NO TAM'S BMIVISICP as recorded In Plat 2684V Wi. +i Iles ('sbita Remerds°at Plsallas Couty. Fisrids6 sumo Ysia4 the polat of Ie' A!t vi (tea host mold-et-eey lima of Ossaefe Street tad Ike Worth Rilht-of-101y f It ?I4voload Mamma ecesrdiall to sold 6AILL AND TATE'S SMOV1S1014. raid point 6010!1. 4'?• ter 347.41 last tram the soatbeost oorvor of sold EAIY.t. 00 TATE'S SISO{VI 'ON (bailiff the basis of bearing for this 444srlptioolt thoa0e N00°14839'E. oleos 04-joest Ttns of said Lat 1. iraLL An TATE'G fli IY1SICN. and the west Ifna at Lot 7. ick f6AIILL'mm"TATi'i'S OMIV1910N. respeo11vall. SOM hates Gold Eoo/ Risht-oily fibs of OsAeale'ordo. for 1311.10 Mmef to the Northwest career of lost *crisis property daesltib If Offlefel llsVards Rook 744. Pogo $41 of Ike Pahllt Records of Plashes Oowlty. flume Np0a14`39't:. steal aald shoot F1er?4, (leas lisle, the POINT Cr Iifal*Rlxol ihassa son I IN a`f fat 7i DiLL AO TATE'S SMIVI$IoN. saw hotel said East RitietNf-ofIlaS •r. OicooLe S(fai1. Ur 10.70 fast to file Narthwst career of said Lot T. ??- AM TATE'S su"Iml . Basso 64141, the pellet of Interaeatioa of Geld East Ri,h!•of-Val lino of 840641a,' Most and the 64426 RfSht-of-fty flat of Leers Street. seeor0cif to sold 941111. IA A t l'E; summetam. those* SWOT'SS'E.• stea, the Mortit If** of said Lai T. EARLL AND L? i'kWa. evisifN. sod the N0r16 sins of Lei a. Ned CANA. ;M TATI:'S SUUD#VI*ION s414 the Y 40at% Iles of Lot s. said FAIN-1. AND TATE's 11119DIViSION. rempettlvely. seas hotel said ~?' ?'?eetb tilhtMf$dJ if" of Lours Strout. for 150.00 lost Is the Northeast Corner of 11414 -s;L.at-m CM LL AND TATE'S itiflDlVIsICN: tAsose sWIO't$'V. alsog the Coat Ilea of sold Lot `; ?.? EAtB.t. AM TATE'S s,' MIVIS10if. for 130.07 Lost to the Southeast sernor of emit Lot 9. •F•JlALL AM TATE'S SM OVISIONNs too%" 1400'07 47`M. stoat ties South flae•ef said Lot 1. t'aIALL AM TATE'S OMIVISl014. ter 49.29 feet to the ,sttfisost tsrair of said Lot 1. 9A$.L 1,W TATZ'S SWIVISIdN, no" Geller the S441160aat watt so said cartel" property described OfI141st Records Beak 744. Pose 04f1 theses N00'OS'irs''E. 41 out the East IlNo of sold sortela property described in 0111-6141 Record% book 744. Pogo $49 for 5.10 fast to the Nerthodtt esramr of sold oertdin property described in Official Reoer4o Rosy 744. Pole ?416 tkmm* NSSe841330tf. close the Narth if" of said eirtais property doseribsd to Off1alet Records Bask 744. Page $41. for 100.22 lest to tied POINT Or K611014110. 1111i0W1) AS (12) CN IAP OF wiiv i Error of elessrta 0.001 toot 141311 i ? PINELLRS COUNTY MR. OFF.REC.6K 12581 PS 1481 volmr m whits A parent of leod•boing a Vertigo of Section 16. Towasht South. Rouge 15 too t. PIsollos County. Fier lids, being amrs our#leaIorII doter Iboot to 4111 yt: 40MMICB at the Southeast corner of Lot I. OWL "AND"TAIN'll S MIVISION as recorded to Plot Hook 11-1. pdas go of Me Psbtto 119401,41s of Pimalow-aa`r. Florida. smdis being the pelat of lateraestloo of the Cost Ri11ht-n!•?ts 'V loo f,1`0aeeele Street add the (tomb Right-of-way lion of 01ovelen4 Avodno 46601`4101 }# pobAKAR.A. AM TATZ'S SUBDIVISION, stid point being If CZ*47'tf. faf 347.41 feet 1tw?r A' ,]satbeast eoratr of $aid EARLL AND TAX's 0MVIVISION (being the basis of bearlag ire Mom desorlpttarll tManao tiCO'IS'39"E. along Ike Weat-11" at said Let i.'EAMN AND TAT,i<Ijk'Stl1Q1Y1S10N. add the wrsf ties of Let 7. said FARLL AND TATIiS SMIVISION. reepto¢lvolr.,>lpmw&dial said East R1961-st-wity line of Omeselo SttesT, for 268.64 feat to the I*tba"t * isr of sold Let T. EMk AND TAT642 81=$VISION. mgprl bslag the paint of 10ler?eatlsld of sold Cost Ri/bt-of-Nar time of Ost"la Street and the South 1111bt•ot-ray time rl!_Ao9#a Streit 4wwrdfag to said EARLL AND TATE'S SUBDIVISION; theses MV 17'S3N. tor,1 al ffot to the Seofhvest earner of Lot l:l, said EAfBJ. AND TATa'S t1UB0lvtSlgV. %iemi lal tho point of laterstatlal of said test Riyhf-of?ay slam of Osesate Street 46? fpsme ,* th R14hf-of-why ilea of agid Lama Strsat. &me also being POINT OF BE0111NINGI totmikNvd1l'tSet. along the Wool lino of tsid Lot 91. EARL(. AM • TATtt'S StMIVISIONo SAM 1"I bg:.$ho root Itlght•of-vor 11ea of said *&deals Stroot. god the tiorthsrly extension of `t1Rt :tt line of said Lot it. 6ARLL'ANO TATE'S 1i1180tVISl011. raspecttvsiy, for 35 J t fostf hsace SW33'31'94 far 347.03 fast to the Waif Right-tfWily' line at Korth Fort Harriman Augment thenci SWQI'37`W. 91641'0411 Neal Rleht-ol-Way Ilea at North Fort,NMrrissip_Av4aoa. for 200.14 foot; thence NWll'20'N, for 173.65 toot( thence spa!28'34'ttf.fe?,l3•t7tf?-l.efs thane 8W59035% for 13.42 teat to a patat on the cost line of bR %at!% 16.00 fat of Let !A, geld P.ARLL AND TATE18 EIMMISIONt th"ce 8001"54444., alagl t11Id East Ilse of the float 10.00 toot of the Lot Ill. EM, AND TAT6'S smolVteloN.`'hr;'t92.77 toot t0 4 point sec tko South line of 0a14 Let ' Ill. EAltl.l. AND TATE'S SUBDiV1?Oljtr=the `1111007'BS'glo class the South lie* of Lots 10. IS. Ito and 21. (aid EARL Aids 71IEEYS IONrespectively. fir 160.16 toot to the POINT OF WAINNING. SHWA Error of elnsare;. 10.9b3,1 ll'? dt831 _ ' ' : Y?' ? 'SYR? IM1661'CS :KI4344MttN{R TM(=iS?12'40 PAGE 111 RCYD AT2R0?463 9.?.?5 A6t??elut?? **TSYTAI PnrF. M ? 4 , J\ x? 1`w %f ia........1`', i EXHIBIT B r'r Title Exceptions 1. Municipal and zoning ordinances. 0 PINELLAS COUNTY FLA. OFF•REC,BK 12391 PS 1492 2. Taxes and assessments for the year 2003 and subseque* omrs. 3. Rights of tenants listed on attached Schedule und'6"r•uhibcoided written leases with no rights of first refusal to purchase the property. q ? Y 4. Easement granted to Florida Power Corpor?ti6r4; a..kj ida corporation from The First National Bank of Clearwater, dated 3/27n6,td64&d 7/22/70 in O.R. Book 3347, Page 350, as re-recorded in O.I. Book 3362, Page 1k8,4Q Q.R. Book 3610, Page 120, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. f 5. Survey by Florida Design Consultants datojanuary 23, 2003, disclosed the following: a. Encroachments of the buildingon Lots 1 and 2 over the South property line. ..,- b. Encroachment of a eQve'IF- d property line of Lo.. x c. Rights of the pU019 th I of Lot 9. ? s d. Encroachment o'fhcpa'ved and 21. J%,% ` . the North property line of Lot 1 and the South portion of the alley way over and across the South line parking area across the South property line of Lots 19, 20, rj r e. Encroapnent'of overhead power line with poles onto Lot 18 and the South property line of P*44I k-r r E Ener'Wh #ent of six foot chain-link fence over the 33.80 feet property line at the aste h'P Qrb in of parcel C. 8 `-$rier*lfanent of overhead wire over North property line of Lot 7 and Lot 8. j, ?"? M NK h? ;Etc?oachment of wall over North property line of Release Parcel U. 6. 0pi , to"Crosswalk Encroachment between AmSouth Bank of Florida and the City of 'Ql t4, Florida, dated September 4, 1996, and recorded September 13, 1996, and rr'? ecoxd &in O.R. Book 9462, Page 1537, of the Public Records of Pinellas County Florida. r L QBMKM5349568.1 t 0 SCHEDULE /J t t LIST OF TENANT4:. x ' AmSouth Bank L; ``• Pinellas County CSM Group, Inc. Triveisity Corporation ?Animated Design Group, Inc., d/b/a VDO Ig ,' Calvary Baptist Church L ry S'?\ rvti? r •..4 \ i ,f • Y f' °'': ?,4 wrv7 1 ; r \ t ;r ? r t? r +,. 1 J r `.! Jtr v d 3 s. i f 0 PINELLAS COUNTY FLA, OFF.REC.8K 12581 PO 1493 QBMKE\5349568.1 Pinellas County Property Apser Information: 16 29.15 23814 000 0010 Page 2 of 4 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 004 / 0010 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:16:50 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales 400 CLEVELAND OBK: 12591 OPO: 1487 406 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204-1704 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 400 CLEVELAND ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004 : 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 3 /2,003 12,59111,487 8,200,000 (H) I 1888: Book OH1 Pgs 020- !0/1,996 9,4811 568 3,100,000 (H) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pga - 0 !0 of 0 0 ( } 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 5,8001000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 5,800,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 5,800,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Bey Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 124,640.88 1) 100 x 120 30.00 12, 000.00 S Special Tax CUI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 140, 575. 76 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 140, 575.76 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB LOTS i & 2 LESS N 10 FT Description IN ALLEY Building Information a http://Pao.co.pineffas.fl.uslhtbinlegi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1&r=&s=1 &u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap*er Information: 16 29 15 00000 120 0300 Page 2 of 3 16 / 29 / 15 /-00000 / 120 / 0300 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:17:49 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales 400 CLEUELAND OBK: 12591 OPO: 1487 406 8 BRAND BLUD GLENDALE CA 91204-1704 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 3 /2,003 12,59111,487 8,200,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 1011,996 9,4811 568 3,100,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 O/ O 0 ( ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 1,364,000 Homestead: NO Ownership 1 .000 Qovt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 1,364,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,364,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Bev Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size U nit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 17,035.05 0 0 x 0 20.00 74, 994.00 8 Special Tax CUI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 33, 059.54 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be ; 33, 059.54 Short Legal BEG AT NU CDR OF LOT 21 OF EARL AND TATES SUB TH N Deacription 233.16FT TH E 347.15FT TH S 20OFT TH U 173.83FT TH S Building Information http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-ser3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=16+29+15+0... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property ApXer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0010 Page 3 of 4 PropgW and Land Use Code descriptions 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0010 :01 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:16:58 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 400 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 331 Land Use: 23 3TruoTural Elernern-ts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Brick Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Reinforced Concrete Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 82 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Above Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Above Average Year Built 1,965 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 94,594 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 4.760 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ELEV PASS 9STOP 30,000.00 3 90,000 36,000 1,965 2) FIRESPRINK 94634 1.75 94,634 165,510 66,240 1,965 3) CARPORT 2000 5.00 2,800 14,000 51600 11965 4) ELEV STOP 9STOP 3,500.00 27 94,500 37,000 1,965 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VA LUE: 145,640 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information ?r .1_ http://pao. co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property ApAer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 00700 Page 2 of 4 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0070 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:18:29 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales 400 CLEVELAND OBK: 12591 OPG: 1487 406 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204-1704 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 400 CLEVELAND ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 3 /2,003 12,591/1,407 8,200,000 (N) I 1888: Book OHi Pgs 020- 10/1,996 9,481/ 568 3,100,000 (N) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 of 0 0 f ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 of 0 0 ( ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 420,000 Homestead: NO Ownership t .008 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 420,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 420,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dev Bd view: 06 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 9,108.37 1) 0 x 0 20.00 18, 900.00 S Special Tax CUI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 10, 179.62 6) 0 x 0 .00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 10,179.62 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB LOTS 7 & 8 LESS ALLEY ON Description S BEING 6.1 FT ON W AND 5.8 FT ON E AND ALL LOT 9 Building Information http://Pao.co.pinellas.R.uslhtbinlcgi-ser3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap*er Information: 16 29.15 23814 000 0070 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 15 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0070 :01 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:18:32 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Bank Branch Property Address: 400 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 331 Land Use: 23 STM"OTura1 Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Floor System Slab on Grade Fixtures 0 Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Bath Tile None Height Factor 0 Electric Average Party Wall None Shape Factor Rectangle Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Quality Average Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fram Year Built 1,965 Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Effective Age 20 Cabinet & Mill Average Other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Carpet Combination Function Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Drywall Economic Depreciation 0 Total Units 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,472 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 450 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .25 2,020 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 it) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 CaTMn0MCial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year i) FENCE 37OLF 11.00 370 4,070 1,630 1,965 2) ASPHALT 6000SF 1.50 61800 10,20.0 10,200 999 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VA LUE: 11,830 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhthinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=O&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap*er Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0190 Page 2 of 4 I 15 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0190 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:18:44 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales 400 CLEVELAND OBK: 12591 OPG: 1487 406 S BRAND BLVD BLENDALE CA 91204-1704 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 400 LAURA ST of'Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 3 /2,003 12,59111,487 8,200,000 (H) I 1888: Book OH1 Pgs 020- 10/!,996 9,4811 568 3,100,000 (H) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 ( ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 435,100 Homestead: No Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 435,100 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt X: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 435,100 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dev Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 61591.59 1) 160 x 122 20.00 19, 520.00 S Special Tax CUI .00 2) 0 x 0 .08 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x O .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 10, 545.61 6) 0 x 0 . 00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 10, 545.61 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB LOTS 19,20 & 21 AND U 10 Description FT LOT 18 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?plus=l &r=0%2EO8&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=1... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apoer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 01910 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 15 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0190 :01 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:18:45 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Bank Branch Property Address: 400 LAURA ST Prop Use: 331 Land Use: 23 STMUOTural E1eman-ta Foundation Continuous Footing Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Floor System Slab on Orade Fixtures 2 Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Bath Tile Floor Only Height Factor 0 Electric Average Party Wall None Shape Factor Square Structural Frame None Quality Average Roof Frame Bable & Hip Year Built 21002 Roof Cover Composition Shingle Effective Age 3 Cabinet & Mill Average Other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Carpet Combination Function Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Drywall Economic Depreciation 0 Total Units 0 Sub Arooas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 432 7) .00 0 2) Carport .30 1,134 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 +Commox, c3.a1 Extra FoBaT"mam Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) FENCE 100 5.00 100 500 200 999 2) ASPHALT 18900SF 1.50 18,900 28,350 28,350 999 3) BK WINDOW 10,000.00 1 10,000 9,900 2,002 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 38,450 Map http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?plus=l &r=0%2EO8&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=1... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Aposer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0190 r1 ? 121103 CO CD f`- 0 d- Q J N O Uj V t!) 4 ? x .72 Ac Page 4 of 4 1210 46 14 150 10-0 7 O? o 12 M Od - 2 7 8 9 10 11 Pinellas County Property Appraises Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen bttp:llpao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?plus=l&r=0%2E08&o=1 &a=1&b=1 &c=1 &s=1... 8/31/2005 LAURA STREET Pinellas Records Clerk of the suit Court Official Records Results Form• KEN BU RKE oil CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PkWass County. Florida Official Records Results Document images now available from January 1, 1997. Page 1 of 1 Records Requested Search Criteria From T Name T e inst Book/Page nst # 115/1987 MAINSTREET CLEARWATER P Records in System: Oldest Date:11511987 Released Date: 812912005 En Date: 813112005 Request Processed: Wed Au 3110:59:09 EDT 2005 Displayed below, Page 1 with 1 Records: 1 thru 1 of 1 MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT LLC to MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT LLC inkl Party a Name To/Fr Other Part Inst Description File Date Book Page Instr # MAINSTREET FIRST BAPTIST LT 4 DESC CLEARWATER acl CHURCH OF DEED EARLL & 12/18/2003 13261 1011 2003522143 DEVELOPMENT CLEARWATER ATES SUB LLC INC ETC http://pubtitlet.co.pinellas.fl.us/officialreclofficialrec/DNIDAReolts2 jsp?documentQuery... 8/31/2005 f. I#: 2003522143 BK: 13261 PG; 1011 ,/18/2003 at 09:34 AM, RECORDING 4 PAGES • r $'19.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $11130.00 KARLEEN F. DE BLAKER, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKPRI3 c ? PREPARED BY AND RBTURi?,; Thomas C. Nash II, ]yJfi Macfarlane Ferguson t k Mullen 625 Court Street, L1 200 Post Office Box 1k 95,33757) Clearwater, Florida-43756 WARRANTY DESD THIS INDENTURE made this /!7 day of December 2003, by and be w n FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CLEARWATER, INC., a Florida non- Dft corporation, Party of the First Part, whose mailing address 331 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, FL 34615, and MAINSTREET ?t 6EARIO TER DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company,' Party of the Second Part, whose mailing address is 206 S. Brand Blvd., Glendale, CA 91204. W I T N E S S E T H: That the said Party of the First Part, for and in consider- ation of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) to it in hand paid by the said Party of the Second Part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Party of the Second Part, its heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to-wit: SEE E=BTT "A^ ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Subject to matters set forth in Exhibit "B^ attached hereto and made a part hereof. Parcel I.D.* No. 16/29/15/23814/000/0030; 16/29/15/23814/000/0040; 16/29/15/23814/000/0050• 16129/15/23814/000/0100 Grantee's Tax I.D. No. / -1- PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. SIX 23Zd1 PG 1012 ?. I t And the said Var*,,/of the First Part does hereby fully warrant the title to sa1?4"?nd, and will defend the same against the lawful N, claims of/, ersons whomsoever. ISS WHEREOF, the said Party of the First Part has its hand and seal the day and year first above writ- tv.q?`i .i % ?4?'E'4J f s'ed, Sealed and Delivered Our Presences t o i Print Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINSLLAS First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc., a Florida non-profit corporation By Name: am R Title: Pr id I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on this day personally appeared before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, James A. Ray, as President of First Baptist Church of Clearwater, Inc., a Florida non-profit corporation, to me personally known or who has produced as identification and who did take an oath, and known to me to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and he acknowledged before me that he executed the same for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my ham and official seal at Clea ter said County and State, this day of December 200 . Notary blic Print Name Yt? My Commission VI 61rq? 14, MU (SEAL) • -2- IINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BR 1S BLi 1013 • EXHIBIT "A" , half (E 1/2) of Lot 4, EARLL AND TATE'S SUBONMON according to the plat thereof, recorded tot 1, Page 20, Public Records of Hlllsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas county was a part 'i =el 2. lot Three (3) and the West half of Lot Four (4) of EARLL AND TAM SUBDIMION, according to map or {rlat thereof as recorded M' Plat Book 1, Page 20, Pubic Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly a part. Parcel 3: Lots 5 and 6 of EARLL AND TATE'S SUBDIMON, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 20, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was formerly a part Parcel 4: Lots 10 and 11, Less the East 5 feet for alley, of EARLL AND TATE'S SUBDIMION of Lot 3 of BAQiMAN'S PLACE In Section 16, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Clearwater Harbor, Florida, according to Plat thereof by Brown & Switgley, Tampa Florida, April 23, 19M recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 20, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida (now Pitellas County, Florida). Also described as: Lot Three (3) and the West one-half (W 112) of Lot Fan (4}, the East one-half (E 1/2) of lot Four (4), Lots Fide (5) and Six ft and Lots Ten (10) and Eleven (11? less the Fast 5 feet for alley of EARLL AND TATE"5 SUBONMON, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded In Plat Book 1, Page 20, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida, of which Pinellas County was fom>erty a part. -3- PINELLAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. BK 10 PG 1014 EXHIBIT "B" 1.?'.???aSces for the year 2004 and subsequent years. ?. 'kesMctive Covenants and Restrictive Conditions as set forth in Quit Claim Deeds recorded In Deed Book 2, Page 127, and Deed Book 2, Page 129, both in ?- \ the Publi6 Records of Pinellas County, Florida (affects Parcels 2 and 3). -3. Easement for public utilities in accordance with a Final Decree entered March 22, 1950 and recorded in Chancery Order Book 250, Page 221, Public Records of. Pinellas County, Florida (affects Parcel 3). 4. Easement granted to City of Clearwater by instrument recorded in O.R. Book 9277, Page 592, as subordinated in the Consent to Easement and Subordination of Interest recorded in Book 9277, Page 1007, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida (affects a portion of Parcel 3). 9bMI DOC r Pinellas County Property Apver Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 003• Page 2 of 4 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0030 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:99:48 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales HAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV OBK: 13261 OPG: 1011 206 S BRAND BLUD 6LENDALE CA 91204-1310 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 410 CLEVELAND ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat'Information 12/2,003 13,261/1,011 1,590,000 (H) I 1888: Book OH1 Pgs 020- 1111,994 8,8401 673 750,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 3 /1,982 5,326/1,593 550,000 (N) I 0000: Book Pgs - 10/1,981 5,2631 138 605,000 (U) I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 530,000 Homestead: NO Ownership X .000 Govt Exam: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 530.000 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exam: 0 Taxable: 530,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CUB Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dev Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Math 04 Taxes: 11,845.68 1) 75 x 120 30.00 9,000.00 S Special Tax CUI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 12, 845.72 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 12, 845.72 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB LOT 3 AND W i/2 LOT 4 Description LESS N 10 FT IN ALLEY Building Information http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1&b=1 &r=&s=1&u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apwer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 00310 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 15 129 / 15 / 23814 / 000 10030 :01 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:09:49 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 410 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 Structural Exam,enta Foundation Continuous Footing Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Floor System Slab on Brade Fixtures 10 Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Bath Tile None Height Factor 0 Electric Average Party Wall None Shape Factor Rectangle Structural Frame None Quality Average Roof Frame Flat Year Built 1.920 Roof Cover Built Up/wood Effective Age 40 Cabinet & Mill Average Other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Carpet Function Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Plastered Direct Economic Depreciation 0 Total Units 0 Sub AMOMO Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 80'050 7) .00 0 2) Utility .40 7,175 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .25 250 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commaroial Extra FBatumam Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 f Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1&a=1 &b=1&r=&s=1&u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apeer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0040 Page 2 of 4 15 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0040 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 1i:10:22 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV OBK: 13261 OPG: 1011 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204-1310 EVAC: Non-EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 418 CLEVELAND ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UhQ) Vac/Imp P1at'Information 12/2,003 13,26111,011 1,590,000 (M) I 1888: Book OH1 Pgs 020- 11/1,994 8,8401 673 750.000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 3 /1,982 5,326/1,593 550,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 10/1,981 5,2631 138 605,000 (U) I 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 181,800 Homestead: NO Ownership x .000 Goat Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 181,800 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1811800 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Day Bd view: 06 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 4.695.61 , 1) 25 x 120 30.00 3,000.00 S Special Tax CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 4,406.32 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 4,406.32 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB E 1/2 OF LOT 4 LESS N 10 Description FT IN ALLEY Building Information http://Pao.co.pineUas.fl.uslhtbinlegi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=O&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apya er Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 004 Page 3 of 4 Properly and Land Use Code descriptions 10 / 29 / 15 / 23014 / 000 / 0040 :01 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:10:22 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 418 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 STMUOTurall Elemenva Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Floor System Slab on Brads Fixtures 5 Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Bath Tile None Height Factor 0 Electric Average Party Wall None Shape Factor Rectangle Structural Frame None Quality Average Roof Frame Bar.Joist/Rigid Fram Year Built 1,916 Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Effective Age 40 Cabinet & Mill Average Other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Carpet Combination Function Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Drywall Economic Depreciation 0 Total Units 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,875 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 1,372 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 i1) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 +Cammt3rcial Extra FeaTxxm ea Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information , http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1&a=1&b=1 &r-&s=1&u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap*er Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0050 Page 2 of4 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0050 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:11:29 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales MIAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV OBK: 13261 OPG: 1011 206 S BRAND BLVD 6LEHOALE CA 91204-13i0 EVAC: Hon-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 420 CLEUELAHD ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 12/2,003 13,261/1,011 1,590,000 (H) I 1888: Book OHi Pgs 020- 11/1,994 8,8401 673 750,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,980 5,024/ 288 205,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,974 4,23511,544 46,900 (U) U 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 605,600 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use t: .000 Assessed/Cap: 605,600 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt x: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 605,600 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Bey Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 13,003.40 i) i00 x 120 30.00 12,000.00 S Special Tax CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 14, 678.05 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 14,678.05 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB LOTS 5 AND 6 LESS N 10 FT Description IN ALLEY Building Information http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r-&s=1 &u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 005 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0050 :01 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:11:29 Commercial Card 01 of 1 Improvement Type: Offices Property Address: 420 CLEVELAND ST Prop Use: 353 Land Use: 71 3TruC'tural ElemenTa Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Floor System Slab on Grade Fixtures 10 Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Bath Tile None Height Factor 0 Electric Average Party Wall None Shape Factor Rectangle Structural Frame None Quality Average Roof Frame Flat Year Built 1,975 Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Effective Age 40 Cabinet & Mill Average Other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Carpet Combination Function Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Plastered Direct Economic Depreciation 0 Total Units 0 sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 10,200 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial EXTMC-1 F(3aTurea Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 1200 SF 1.50 1,200 11800 1,800 999 2) FIRESPRINK 16200SF 1.75 10,200 17,850 15,710 11996 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VA LUE: 17,510 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information ?5 . t http://Pao.co.Pinellas.fl.uslhthinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=O&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property App?er Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 010 Page 2 of 3 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0100 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:12:28 Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales HAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEU OBK: 13261 OPG: 1011 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204-1310 EVAC: Non-EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat'Information 12/2,003 13,261/1,011 1,590,000 (H) I 1888: Book CHI Pgs 020- 1111.994 8,840/ 673 750,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 5 /1,982 5,34212,093 162,500 (q) U 0000: Book Pgs - 0 18 01 0 0 ( ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 142,900 Homestead: NO Ownership X .008 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 142.900 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 142,900 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CWD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Bey Bd View: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 3,173.55 1} 95 x 130 13.00 12, 350.00 S Special Tax CWI .00 2) O x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 100 3,463.50 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 3,463.50 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB LOTS 10 AND 11 LESS E 5FT Description FOR ALLEY Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &i=&s=l &u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property APEW Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 010q* 4 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 10 / 29 / 15 123814 / 000 10100 Page 3 of 3 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 11,12:26 Vacant Parcel Property Use: 290 Land Use: to Vacant Extra poz-Mures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 5000 1.50 5,000 0 7,500 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 7,500 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen s http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhthin/cgi-ser3?o= l &a=1 &b=1 &r-&s=1 &u=0&p=16+29+15+2... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap^er Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0180 Page 2 of 6 16 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0180 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:13:58 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales WHTBUFF INC OBK: 11839 OPG; 2293 6901 22ND AUE N D t?V ST PETERSBURG FL 33710-3943 U/ /a) q01 oat W EVAC : Non-EUAC eYA ff?k ±? A'r Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 416 LAURA ST of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 259.01 sales from 2003 - 2004: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 2 /2,002 11,83912,293 870,000 (H) I 1888: Book OH1 Pgs 020- 6 /1,998 10,13211,881 225,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 Of 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - .0 /0 Of 0 0 { ) 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 279,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exam: NO Use 2: .000 Assessed/Cap: 279,000 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt .000 Historic Exam: 0 Taxable: 279,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: . CUD Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater Downtown Dev Bd view: 05 Millage: 24.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 61591.59 1) 60 x 123 15.00 7,380.00 S Special Tax CWI .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be ; 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 6,762.18 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be ; 6,762.18 Short Legal EARL & TATE'S SUB W 20FT OF LOT 17 & E 40FT Description OF LOT 18 Building Information http://pao.co.pineflas. fl.uslhtbinlcgi-ser3?plus=l &r=0%2EO8&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=1... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Aploer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0180 Property and Land Use Code descriptions • Building 1 • uildin • Building 3 Building #1 Page 3 of 6 15 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0180 :01 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:13:46 Commercial Card 01 of 3 Improvement Type: Retail Store Property Address: 416 LAURA ST Prop Use: 327 Land Use: 12 S-truc-tural EXamenTS Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on 6rade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Terrazzo Mono Interior Finish Plastered Direct Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures g Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,957 Effective Age 10 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 592 7) .00 0 2) Canopy .25 400 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Featur8s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) CONC PAVE 2040 3.00 2,040 61120 61120 999 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 61120 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?plus=l&r=0%2EO8&o=1&a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=1... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apoer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 0180 Page 4 of 6 1+6 / 29 / 15 / 23814 / 000 / 0180 :02 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:13:53 Commercial Card 82 of 3 Improvement Type: Duplex/Triplex Property Address: 416 LAURA ST Prop Use: 327 Land Use: 12 STMU4--tural ElamanTa Foundation Spread/Nono Footing Floor System Slab on Orade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plastered Direct Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 9 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,957 Effective Age 20 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation - 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Are3mm Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 1,246 7) .00 0 2) Upper Stry Base Area .90 702 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .09 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Camrnarcial Extra Faa-turas Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) FIREPLACE 1 800.00 1 800 BOB 1,975 2) PATIOIDECK 494 6.50 494 4,200 1,680 1 975 3) .00 0 0 0 , 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 2,480 Building #3 http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlegi-scr3?plus=l &r=0%2EO8&o=1 &a=1&b=1 &c=1 &s=l ... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apoer Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 018® Page 5 of 6 15 r 29 r 15 r 23814 r 000 r 0180 :03 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 14:13:56 Commercial Card 03 of 3 Improvement Type: Retail Store Property Address: 416 LAURA ST Prop Use: 327 Land Use: 12 8TWuc-tural ElemenTs Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Brade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Hone Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Hardwood/Parquet Interior Finish prywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 2 Bath Tile Hone Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,957 Effective Age 10 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 750 7) .00 0 2) .00 0 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commercial Extra Features Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map RR oa®?? http://Pao.co.pineRas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-ser3?plus=l&r=0%2EO8&o=1&a=1&b=1&c=1&s=1.., 8/31/2005 1? Pinellas County Property Apeser Information: 16 29 15 23814 000 01 c i i Page 6 of 6 MIM IN= 0: 0 LL X Pinellas County Property Appraise. Parcel Information Back to Search Paee An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pincUas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-ser3?plus=l&i=0%2E08&o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &s=1... 8/31/2005 LAURA STREET CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Jerry and Teresa Tas are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 17 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 78 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 14 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr and 343 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 and part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07066 2. Griffin International, Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit Alcoholic Beverage Sales in the Commercial (C) District on a parcel of land contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Sec 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Alcoholic Beverage Sales) at 1575 Highland Ave S, Sec 23-29-15, M&B 34.03. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-08082 3. Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc, and North Clearwater Beach Development, LLC (Anthony Menna) are requesting 1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (11 existing attached dwelling units to remain where a maximum of 10 attached dwelling units would be permitted under current Code); 2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr under the provisions of Secs 4-1402 and 4-1403; and 3) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwelling units in the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 59.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 42 inches for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 2 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 1.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pool deck), and to allow 5 parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4-5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-08087 4. '460 Cleveland, LLC, Mainstreet Clearwater Development, and Whtbuff, Inc (TH Management, LLC, Laura Street Development, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 sq ft of non- residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the 0 s permitted height from 30 ft to 380 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 27 ft for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (245 attached dwellings, 98,500 sq ft retail/restaurant/movie theatre, and 87,800 sq ft office)] at 400, 410, 418, & 420 Cleveland St and 416 Laura St, Sec 16-29-15, M&B 12-03, Earl & Tate's Sub Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9-10, 19-21 and part of lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 17, & 18. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-08084 5. Ronald E & Karen L Kozan (Newkirk Ventures Inc) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the addition of a pool to a previously approved attached dwelling project (FLD2005-05045, approved August 16, 2005) in the Medium High Density Residential (M DR) District with a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (26 condominiums) with pool] at 405 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 15 & S '/z of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 08086 6. Dam Devon LLC (City of Clearwater) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a parking lot in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to minimum lot area from 20,000 sq ft to 16,500 sq ft, a reduction to the front (north along Devon Dr/First Ave) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Dr) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Public parking lot for 25 parking spaces) at 41 Devon Dr, Columbia Sub, Blk B, E '/2 of Lot 1. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08089 7. Peter Pan Developments LLC (Panayiotis Vasiloudes, Petrit Meroli, Somerset Condominium) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 15,000 sq ft to 13,087 sq ft, reductions to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 120 ft along Bay Esplanade and from 150 ft to 110 ft along Somerset St, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 22 ft (to water feature), reductions to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 11 ft (to building and pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 46.83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Bay Esplanade from 5 ft to 3 ft (for the retention pond planting area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset St from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)] at 693-699 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 76 & unplatted Blk 76. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08090 8. Peter Pan Development LLC & Epic Holdings South LLC (Bay Esplanade Condominium) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 13 ft (to water feature), reductions to the front (north) setback along Somerset St from 15 ft to 12.67 ft (to building), from 15 ft to 9.83 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 0 0 46.83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)] at 685-689 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 12-13, & part of Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08088 9. Jaycee Roth is requesting an appeal of an administrative determination denying the ability to apply for an Animal Boarding Facility use as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Downtown East Gateway Character District, per Sec 3-502. (Proposed Use: Animal Boarding Use) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub Lot 3 & parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. APP2005-00002 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that parry status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 10/30/05 5 04 FLD20058084 - 51 1059 INC 400 CLEVELAND 200 N BETTY LN # 6F 406 S BRAND BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4700 GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1704 BOMAN, MASHALL BOMAN,DONNA J 12140 92ND AVE SEMINOLE FL 33772 - 2652 BRIGHT KNIGHT PROPERTIES LC 825 BUTTONWOOD LN DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7200 CAFE CONCERTO INC 800 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 903 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 3002 CHETKIN, LEONARD CHETKIN, MARY E 701 WASHINGTON ST KEY WEST FL 33040 - 4732 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Doug Williams, President 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 FIRST CHURCH OF CHRIST SCIENTI 210 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5213 GIRONELLA, BONNIE R 430 OLD OAK CIR PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - JANNELLI, GILBERT G 909 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903 LOKEY, PAT 409 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 CAPEL PROPERTIES 995 MONTE CRISTO BLVD TIERRA VERDE FL 33715 - 2036 CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SVC 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CLEARWATER-GARDEN TOWER OPERAT 330 GARFIELD ST SANTA FE NM 87501 - 2640 FL SPORT DANCE FEDERATION OF A 483 MANDALAY AVE STE 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2035 GOUDREAULT, JOSEE 24-28 N FT HARRISON CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4015 KESSLER, WALTER H THE WITTCOFF, ROSLYN K 2413 BAYSHORE BLVD # 406 TAMPA FL 33629 - 7333 MAINSTREET CLEARWATER DEV 206 S BRAND BLVD GLENDALE CA 91204 - 1310 0 e - I- ARNOLD, LEE E JR 17757 US HIGHWAY 19 N # 275 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6592 BROWN, ARNOLD PROPERTIES 17757 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 275 CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 6592 CHAMBERS, DIANNE B CHAMBERS, JAMES D 820 EL DORADO AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOU 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF CLEARW 331 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4002 GENDUSA, SAMUEL J ROCKWELL, JOY 404 S MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AV CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5719 JAMESCHRIS CORP 431 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 KWALL, LOUIS KWALL, JEAN H 133 N FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4020 Mark Rieker 1020 N. Orlando Avenue, Suite 150 Maitland, FL 32751 MATRIX LODGING MINTON, ROBERT S ONE STOPPE SHOPPE INC 8 S FORT HARRISON AVE 503 CLEVELAND ST 411 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5105 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 ,r r OSCEOLA CLEVELAND LLC 413 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4004 PINELLAS COUNTY 315 COURT ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165 SALAM, JAMI AL INC DBA ALBANIA 225 N FT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4022 SNAKED, AKIVA GINZBERG, HEMDA 322 HILLTOP CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 5020 THRESHOLD CONSULTING SERV INC 200 N GARDEN AVE STE B CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4187 0PANAGOULIAS, P THE PANAGOULIAS, K THE CLEVELAND STREET TRUST 2907 W GREGORY ST CHICAGO IL 60625 - 3911 PINELLAS SUNCOAST TRANSIT 14840 49TH ST N CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 2835 SALINAS, MARY THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS TRUST 319 S GARDEN AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5423 STACK, MALCOLM 531 F N PINCKNEY ST MADISON WI 53703 - 1432 TSAFATINOS, ANNA 667 SNUG IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1830 PEACE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CH 110 S FORT HARRISON AVE CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5107 PRIME SERV AMERICA INC 66 MIDWAY ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2311 SALINAS, MARY THE CHURCH SCIENTOLOGY RELIGIOUS 503 CLEVELAND ST CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4007 TH Management, LLC 400 Cleveland St, Ste 900 Clearwater, FL 33755 TSAFATINOS, TERRY 667 SNUG IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1830 WHTBUFF INC WILDER CORP DELAWARE WILSON & GERLACH 6901 22ND AVE N 3000 GULF TO BAY BLVD STE 600 101 N GARDEN AVE # 110 ST PETERSBURG FL 33710 - 3943 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 4316 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - 4118 ' ;Gilbert G. Jannelli, O.D. Optometrist i Main Office' r 909 S. Ft. Harrison 5620 Grand Blvd., Suite A " Clearwater, FL 33756 > New Port Richey, FL 34652 1-727-461-2020 1-813-849-2112 Community Development Board ' November 4, 2005 ' City of Clearwater C/O: Planning, department ? ' Robert G,. Tefft 100 S.' Myrtle-Ave. ? ,Clearwater, Fl. 33756 Dear Community Development Board' _ RE: FLD 2205-08084 As an adjacent property owner to this fabulous project, i am in complete support of this most magnificent development for the State of Florida, Pinellas county and Downtown Clearwater. WOW! Mr. Jaffe and his development partners have designed a great masterpiece a "signature" project for downtown Clearwater. This is an extremely pristine project ,proposed. by high quality developers and investors on a high quality land sight. Because of a previous commitment out side of the US, I willbe unable to attend this important case presentation. I Strongly approve of this project as a continued catalyst for major economic development for Downtown Clearwater. I congratulate Mr. Jaffe and his partners for their vision in this dynamic proposal for our city. Their extended financial commitment to Downtown Clearwater is strongly appreciated. Please approve this project for FAST-TRACK development. - Sincerely, cc Gilbert G. Jannelli O.D. y Bitt. Horne City Manager v J City Council-members Pam Akin City A?#omey 7 A I' NOV - 9 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT - SERVICES CiT,, OF ?l-?ARWATER' Chairman David Gildersleeve aWember of the Community Developn#± Board Page 1 of 1 Tefft, Robert From: Terry Tsafatinos [terry.tsafatinos@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 4:17 PM To: Tefft, Robert Subject: Community development Terry Tsafatinos 667 Snug Island Clearwater 33767 Ph 727 441 2660 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III City of Clearwater Planning Department Re: Acqua Plaza Downtown Clearwater Dear Sir, As a property owner of Downtown Clearwater, I personal feel that the Acqua Plaza will be a very nice and real good building and will be proud if it happens. It will be good for the city and for all of the citizens. This plan has qualities that are classic and eye-pleasing. It is exactly what Downtown Clearwater needs to gain the respect of tourists and local residents. Please support this great project. Thank you, Terry Tsafatinos 11/14/2005 0 0 STONEBRIDGE r e a l e s t a t e Integrity is Everything's Chairman David Gildersleeve & Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board c/o city of Clearwater Development Review Division 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: The Acqua & Downtown Plaza Dear Chairman & Members, November 14, 2005 I wish to express my support of this incredible project, which is just what is needed bring new life to downtown Clearwater! Since my grandparents retired here in the 40's I have been coming Clearwater all my life, and I moved here with my family as a full time resident and a business/property owner 6 years ago. I have watched the ebbs and flows of downtown. Now I see that you have before you the perfect project to make our dream come true for a fun, vibrant and prosperous downtown. The combination of high end residences, retail stores, restaurants and movie theater create the ideal combination of attractions. It is obvious that it will be a well built & designed project to elevate the stature and ambiance of the whole area. I have spoken to many people in town, and all agree that the stunningly beautiful design of this project will give Clearwater a new and very distinct and magnificent skyline! I support that you move this new development forward very quickly. With best regards, ORIGINAL RECEIVED R NOV 14 2005 Donna Andrus PLANNING DEPARTMENT Co-Owner & Executive Associate CITY OF CLEARWATER cc: The Honorable Frank Hibbard, Mayor Mr. Bill Horne, City Manager Stonebridge Real Estate Company, Inc. • 1465 S. Fort Harrison Avenue, Suite 103 • Clearwater, FL 33756 Cellular (727) 643-1171 • Office (727) 443-5000 • Facsimile (727) 443-55o8 • www.stonebridgerealtors.com 0 "ARKBRIDGE CAPITAL GROUP, INC. TM November 11, 2005 Chairman David Gildersleeve Clearwater Community Development Board City of Clearwater Development Review Commission 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL. 33756 Re: Acqua & Downtown Plaza Project Dear David and Members of the CCDB, We recently relocated to the greater Clearwater area, after spending several years living on the West Coast, near San Francisco, CA. and Portland, OR. We enjoy much of what this area has to offer, and now, find Clearwater poised to takes its place on the leading edge of community renewal and development. A project of the Acqua's stature and impact can now bestow its benefits to the entire area, and bring Clearwater into the focal point of design, 21st century metropolitan amenities, exciting flair, but with small town flavor. It offers the best of both worlds. It is a rare opportunity! As a real estate investor, and one who enjoys the offerings of modern urban developments, your endorsement and approval of the entire Acqua project will have a wonderful long-term effect on the vibrancy and livability of the city. Sincerely, A --R? ?? C?" Leon D. Meek ms President LM:me ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1920 Saddle Hill Rd. N., Suite Zoo Dunedin, FL. 34698 PH 727-785-9586 Email Lee@parkbridgecapital.com FX 866-652-5233 • • AKIVA'S 45 N. Fort Harrison Ave. Clearwater, Fl 33755-4016 November 14, 2005 Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board c/o City of Clearwater Development Review Division 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Fl 33756 Dear Community Development Board: As another company doing business in downtown Clearwater, I would like to state our full support for this project. The Acqua Downtown Plaza will be considered by the board November 15, 2005. I positively approve of this project as I know this will be a great addition to downtown Clearwater. I also compliment Mr. Elias Jafif and his team of developers for such an excellent and beautifully designed building; also for the retail stores, movie theatre, and restaurants. This will all benefit downtown and the City of Clearwater greatly. Sincerely, ORIGINAL RECEIVED Cc: The Hon. Frank Hibbard Mrs. Pam Akin Mr. Bill Horne Mr. Rod Irwin NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY Of CLEARWATER • • e?A?eppe S1o 4i O? ater, 411 Cleveland Street Clearwater FL 33755 Tel (727)449-1674 Fax (727)449-0888 Sales@OneStoppeShoppe.com November 11, 2005 Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board c/o City of Clearwater Development Review Division 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater FL 33756 Dear Board Member: I am in favor of the Clearwater Acqua and Downtown Plaza proposal as I feel it would create a very positive effect on Clearwater's downtown district and would be of benefit to all of Clearwater. The project is of world class dimensions and quality and would be a definite contribution to the rebirth of downtown. As a business owner who has been committed to the success of our downtown since 1989, 1 can tell you that I wholeheartedly support this venture. The movie theater and restaurants have always been highly desired by my customer base and by extension, the general public. High density residential units in such proximity to Cleveland Street are just what the downtown needs to spark its rebirth. Please give this project favorable consideration. Sincerely, Paris Morfopoulos President ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • La Oea'a YfairStudio November 14, 2005 Clearwater Development Board C/O City Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: CW Acqua and The Downtown Plaza Dear Members of the Community Development Board: 0 I would like to lend my support for you to approve of this project as I know this will be a great addition to downtown and all of the City of Clearwater. I admire Mr. Jafif and his team for dreaming of a building such as CW Acqua. Also The Downtwon Plaza with the plans of the movie theatre, restaurants and retail stores. This will definitely assist in reviving and bringing life and foot traffic back to Downtown Clearwater greatly. Please approve of the CW Acqua and The Downtown Plaza that will be before you on November 15, 2005. Sincerely, ORIGINAL Nicole F?? RECEIVED Salon Owner NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Cc: Mr. Frank Hibbard Mr. Bill Horne 121 N Fort Harrison Ave, Clearwater, FL 33755 (727) 446-4959 • • CREATIVE CARPENTRY OF CLEARWATER, INC. 1910 Sandpiper Drive, Clearwater, Florida 33764 To: Downtown Planning Dear Sirs, I wanted to share my view that I am in support of the plans for developing downtown Clearwater, and specifically the Acqua development project. As a business owner in the area, I feel it is a positive step when the downtown core grows and moves forward with both residential opportunities as well as business opportunities. I consider this project a major step in our expanding city and look forward to this project taking place and contributing to it's enriched development. Respectfully, Mr. R. Broughton ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Robert Broughton --- Office 727-409-5572 - Fax 727-599-2409 Chairman David Gildersleeve and Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board November 11, 2005 Re: Acqua/ The Downtown Plaza Dear Chairman Gildersleeve, I can't begin to tell you how much the Acqua Downtown Plaza would mean to my clinic. Presently I have little or no walk-in traffic. With the Acqua building, I would have local residents who could simply walk to the clinic to receive care. I'm sure the other businesses in the downtown core would feel the same. What is missing are downtown residents who use the local services. Most of downtown is made up of businesses and the employees leave after work and don't return. I'm hoping that with the Acqua Building and the Movie Theatres, people will come to the downtown, walk around and become familiar with all that Downtown has to offer. I believe businesses in the downtown have stagnated because of the lack residents and that business expansion is clearly limited. Opening up the downtown to residents would be one way of improving this. ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 141005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER "Keeping you healthy and pain free for life" 727-447-4647 Fax 727-443-3195 129 Garden Avenue North Clearwater, Florida 33755 www.FamilyLifeHealthCenter.com CHIROPRACTIC HEALTH CENTER C VNC - Value Nutrition Center 514 Park St. # A Clearwater, Fl. 33756 727 445-1188 - nutrilOot e.net E November 10, 2005 Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board C/o City of Clearwater Development Review Division 100 S Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, Fl. 33756 Dear Development Board: As a Business in Downtown we would like to let you know our support for this Downtown development projects. The Acqua Plaza will be considered by the board November 15, 2005. We think this project will be beneficial for Downtown Clearwater. We would like to see what it promises to bring to Downtown: A beautiful building, residents and businesses like retail stores, movie theatre and restaurants. We think this will benefit the whole City and Downtown Clearwater. Sincerely, t Joe Pereira Owner ORIGINAL RECEIVED Cc: The Hon. Frank Hibbard Mrs. Pam Akin Mr. Bill Horne Mr, Rod Irwin NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER • Je M4. Pizzeria Authentic Italian Pizza Nov 9 2005 Chairman David Gildersleeve and Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board c% City of Clearwater Development Review Division IDOS. MyrtleAve. Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Acqua- The Downtown Plaza Dear Mr. Gildersleeve: On hehalf of Cafe Milano, we want to express our support for the Acqua project. This project will be evaluated by you on November 15, 2005. We believe al l of this new creation will help to bring new !ife into the downtown area. The multi-screen movie theater, retail stores, restaurants will be a great benefit not only to downtown and its residents, but to the entire City of Clearwater. We invite you and ai I of the Community Development Board to vote in support of (his extremely positive project. Si , er of Cafe Milano cc: Mayor Frank Hibbard Mrs. Pam Akin Mr. Bill I tome - City Manager Mr. Rod Irwin - Assistant City Manager ORIGNVAL RECEIVED NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CRY OF CLEARWATER E Associates Paul Olson Rosalyn Carlton Spagnola Sharon (Fifi) Besio H I G H 413 Cleveland St Clearwater, Fl 33755 727-466-6697 P 0 I N T 7 27-466-6588 fax R E A L T Y 727-804-21 16 cell • Broker/Owner David L. Kerr Chairman David Gildersleeve and November 10, 2005 Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board C/O City of Clearwater Development Review Division 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: The Acqua - The Downtown Plaza Dear Mr. Gildersleeve: ORIGINAL RECEIVED NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER This letter is to declare my strong support for the planned Acqua development. It is my understanding that this development is to be reviewed by you and your board on November 15, 2005. I am the owner of 413 Cleveland Street, where my offices are located, and the owner of a downtown business, High Point Real Estate Corp. The soaring, landmark Acqua condominium tower, along with the multi-screen movie theatre, restaurants and stores, is what is needed to revive downtown Clearwater and make it a refreshing and stylish destination for residents and visitors. am familiar with the excellent track record of the developers, and expect them to finish a "world class" development, like they have done in other locations, which will significantly move forward Clearwater in it's ideal urban coastal location. As a real estate professional, I have presented the plans for the Acqua and Downtown Plaza to numerous Clearwater residents and visitors who have come to my office over the past few months. The support for the project has been unanimous from everyone. Yours truly, W -1611V David L. Kerr President cc: Mayor Frank Hibbard Vice Mayor Bill Johnson Mrs. Pam Akin City Manager Bill Horne Ass't City Manager Rod Irwin Mr. John Doran Mr. Hoyt Hamilton Mrs. Carlin Peterson Paul D. Sonz P A R T N E R S November 9, 2005 • Chairman David Gildersleeve Members of the Clearwater Community Development Board c/o City of Clearwater Development Review Division 100 S Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Dear Mr. Gildersleeve: As a member of the business community here in downtown Clearwater I am very encouraged by the Acqua Downtown. Plaza. Projects of this quality and elegance can only increase the attractiveness of our community to successful businesses, other investors and providers of amenities in general, all of which will directly benefit those of us who live and work here. So it is with these thoughts in mind that I give my full support to the Acqua Downtown Plaza project that will be considered by the board November 15, 2005. I'm certain that this project will do nothing but enhance the image of downtown Clearwater, The City of Clearwater and most importantly, greatly benefit the citizens of Clearwater. In closing, I would like to pay compliment to Mr. Elias Jafif and his team of developers for envisioning such a beautifully designed project. Sincerely, Paul D. Sonz Managing Partner ORIGINAL RECEIVED cc: Mayor Frank Hibbard Mr. Bill Horne NOV 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 33 N. Garden Ave., Suite 775, Clearwater, FL 33755 Phone: 727.447.6040 1001 Second St., Suite 255, Napa, CA 94559 • Phone: 707.255.0766 0 0 W1 111f EUffA[010 34 North Fort Na ften Avenue,CleanvNer Wds 33755 Telephone 727.4610668-FacslmNe 727,4610565 1119/5 Dear Community Development Board As a business and property owner in downtown Clearwater. (1 own 2 properties downtown, 34 N. Ft. Harrison and 534 Cleveland. ) My vision in buying property in the downtown, has always been, to see this city live up to it's tremendous potential and now we have that chance. So the purpose of this letter is to lend my full support to the Acqua Downtown Plaza project. In my opinion, we are at the start of an exciting time for Clearwater. I consider Clearwater to be very fortunate to have such a professional team of developers lead by Mr. Jafif (whom I have had the privilege to meet over the past year or so) interested in us. Mr. Jafif and his team have reached out to me, showing me that they have my best interests in mind, as well as all of Clearwaters. I congratulate the city on it's most recent accomplishments the library, the beautiful new bridge and the upcoming street scape project, all major steps forward, well done. This can be one more big step forward. Sincerely Jon Heneghan President WHT BUFF Inc. cc: Mayor Frank Hibbard Vice Mayor Bill Johnson Mrs. Carlin Peterson Mr. John Doran Mr. Hoyt Hamilton Mr, Bill Home Mrs. Pam Aiken ORIGINAL RECEIVED ?,0y 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 400 Cleveland, LLC, Mainstreet Clearwater Development, and Whtbuff. Inc (TH Management, LLC, Laura Street Development, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 sq ft of non- residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the permitted height from 30 ft to 380 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 27 ft for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (245 attached dwellings, 98,500 sq ft retail/restaurant/movie theatre, and 87,800 sq ft office)] at 400, 410, 418, & 420 Cleveland St and 416 Laura St, Sec 16-29-15, M&B 12-03, Earl & Tate's Sub Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9-10, 19-21 and part of lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 17, & 18. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner 111. FLD2005-08084 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30._a.m. and-4:30 p.m.; weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department,-100 S` My- tl" e., ICfearwater,,?FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 t `d scu s any ??ue?s?ions on coficerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and r vi?eaw, site pati - (? 1 NOV - 4 2005 - J PL1,NNIN R DEVELOPMENT SERVICES r;- EARWATER 0 0 Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE:, Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE IF YOU ARE THE APPLICANT OR OWN PROPERTY WITHIN 200 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUHUNG REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 10/30/05 I I I t.b ?.o0s • OppB y - ?U C't??ECa.?o w.. N ° G 4 I) g /I SUNSET C U --^i-7?. O O to ,a ,7 7 0 0 B ?n- !h xasJ- B 4 5 HENORICK$ rot 1 9 6 7 6 5 4} 2 1 W 8 9 W 2235- ? » 9:6-s1 L_ - -xe0 E R L . t ^ SB m „ STREET$ s 5 I m ' ';- Ia I9 G a JJ } 5 21 20 19 1a 7 15 ° g -,dl?fi z 33 15 16 } f 4 D. 1093-199 $ m 362 tyL Ia .I 'A 13 74 1 17 16 12 13 ib 15 n16 ?I .,i»• RCS. 91-J9 t522 ;f6-t9 96 e m „n & I G 2 926 Bii-?ezM LAURA $TREET 333 (1? ,oo 9 HARBORVIEW CENTER 75 * ;3 F v m LAURA $ mSTREET» „ $ 00 ° ROMPON' & BASKINS 7998-606 7 6 2 9 - A 10 b ?k s a ]u sa 9 10 tt \ tl 6 7fi r,P.) 3 2 t 5 a h3 2 1 TATION I 1 !B A SP OUARE mo ]11 643 13 !L 7 ; 4,4' 3 fi I ARK 3 64- 35 E LLS L[ ? 2778 278A `_' w 2 4 aoo } / 2 3 a I 5 } t 2 4 6 5 4 } 2 Jo 4 O too t6o - } „ 95- NI m $ „ loo 3 6 0 1 m } ° s6 3667 59 25 21 011 ? - R DREW - - - 6D - - » » a ' 1 7 l 1YB p / 55 1 JS 8 7 B0 TREET S.R.S R - 628-20 p ,.9D-55) 5-233 12/07 196 1 +11 m q m m „m m m I mrpr 1522- 12/08 +642-m ]B4 9205-629 12/05 IYB 12/07 1. ,t+2 9 6 9 8 7 4 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 0 9 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30 m .. as. der 1415- COACH ?4h4 PARK MAIN 1199ARY mo t2/Oa ,t, IIB 9 »9 4 S 10 iii 5 ,3 ++/ot NALL 9 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 j 2 9J FORD &-kfOYER 4-1 O ° }? 2 6 f MORTON50N 3 „ 4 5 6 7 8 9 01 X ,o< 7 6 161 . s : 2 r 8B = 5 h ^1 - •a 9-uu 12/03 ro] `4 21 8 GROVE STREET I n 7 - 5 1 A , 2 5 4 3 1 210 58 a t 11;3 9 t0 11 14 6 7 6 9 t0 R 9- 6 n 13 2 D D 1081-59. s 8 ss g u y&n na 8s6 1 8 & D' » h CLEVELAND $ m (S.R, 60) » STREET BAYFRONTnTENN COMPLEX 1 7 s 1" a' 3 non 2`°i.9':? m`.'9?° 4$ } i-2 ee F .9m"„„8 m A em 1'^.".rt." a^ 6 8 12/09 2 ?j N 3 7 m6 5 4m 3 2 1 5 h14»3h 2h f 1 2 J. R. DAVEY 74 6 8 an 23 G m< I1 4 fi ,7 f 2 8 9 r1z 13 14 6 7 8 9 t0 76 15 L ® - - - :o ''3 9 22 s 3$`a y`„ S6i1 f' n :e I- 3 8 1 - 53 m 13D 9m » ,DS - S 2t 1 .7 As, d16 3 < 10 $ PARK STREET $ I $ „ wI I .... J.. 20 7 9 52 R Q x Hl 7 12 19 52 9 PIERCIE 3 z t n 3 t loo I ? 5 . ?..: _ 4 6 y 8 19-9 14/01 ?6: m ass-193 PIERCE STREET o3 3J - 9 15 16 n a o ti a.1 4 7 sag] n Im ..w. 11sw .. P .. u's'1 4 1 z 3I y- 7 5 6, 7 ' ? 3 4 5 3 r Is '- d M ,S. ,oo 14 ° r - y 91-t 2 f 709 13 1 11 9 1 7 6 to Em 0: 9 9 .D 4 166 3 I 2 I 1 m 13/06 z°D° 71 PIERCE 0311-„c < L m STREET $ $ F. DEED 77385 ? 13/07 +? ? I W H U N w. >u zoz so' 13/08 0 ---_r---- 13/01 t,a 2 9 z4?o3 OAK COVE CONDO. 1`10 1 3 .r. DEED ,]J), 102-92 3 4 6 7 6 w.....»., 5 909 5 - 3 s,. 'I" --- 13/10 a5 90713/04 5 0 e m r 3 ..` .4 5 6 m7 3 3 loo tag Q ? 1 2 3 4 5 - w P I yl 1`4 1 T65 a 9 0 9 I 7 $,.. v. 6 IS .. ,2 11 10 e 93 tag n it SI Yp1 a ro9 » / $ x197]101 FRANKLIN 216m°) 3 n 73/03 13/02 101 9a STREET $ $ w. s....x •p 911 999 40 39 ;, 6 1 b b o „ m 991 0 38 7 DEED 17498 2 r''dv7 K e 2 41 1 2 ZF 6 O 1 m 5 6 7 1 1 } 4 5 D C 2O n 7 2 1 42 37 6 B= ,3 1 2 3 4 1 ry --- ---- S 2 Z 996 966 65 COU 36 R 9 74 F ? -sot m 1.,e 5 t 0 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 310 9 18, ,,, ,,, - COVRT 1965-661 h EE 1,44 7 6 5 1 s0 iass 2 ----?--- 40o TUR ER 43 --- OAK t 3 4 Y BLUFFS 6 D dr4 z 3/72 CONDO. < 90 102-96 ... Do z ?? 1 c Fl- FI ST 4 3 4 3DEE ..a..° -- ve K_ ry lm " ' mo 7zMARKLEY z E u HI97 3 11 121 14 16 S U `w R 1 $ 1a. 96r m 1999-299 COURT D STREET I 8 daa6 33 'g 4 D a .°`8mm 3 ° m e ^ n $ MARKLEY $ $T 9yz?r 15 16 > ° 1 2 g 1 7 11 9 1 2 3 4 5 19 0 47 413 48 49 32 3t 304to 100 L3 N 1D? 0 16 17 16 -- 15 14 13 112 111 10 41a 10 9 6 7 6 I H 50 25 2 0 74 4 29 .t6 1 I In vac Nle .e13-n1 30? rz1y 51 6 2] a 40 m -37 R STREET A m a 2 1 D 4 Sn - 1 78 6 6 ]9 „I? 'a o m 8 3 -4 -11 FTTT 7 3 8 8 X-;r/ mCay'M" CITY OF CLEARWATER tt1?5?` v s? AND VICINITY 0ti,iE PINEU.A5 COUNTY, FLORIDA t??t'/ ? PREPARED BY r PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION q?er1 1005. MKile ANQNCYearl Hater, It 33756 Pn.: (727)562-4750, Foc (727)526-1755 m,p: //www.deorwoler-u.com/Cny_Drponmem9/pama_nolk9/engineer/ Discloimer: Public information data Is furnished by the City of Cleorw.ler Public Works Adminlsirallon/Engineering. and must be accepted and used by the recipient with the und-to,d'og that the dol. re 'ved was collected for the purpose of developing o graphic infrastructure inventory. As such, the City of Clearwater PWA/E makes no wortanlles, enpressed or implied, concerning the .cu.cy, completeness. reliability. or suitability of this data for anyoth,, particular use. Furl herm.re, the City of Clearwater PWA/E assumes no Mobility whot...w, ossocioted with the use or misuse of such dol.. NOTE: This Atlas page is s bject to periodic change>. For information about latest revis a s please call PWA/E or ei9a oar Web site. N 0 100 200 400 600 SCALE: 1" = 400' LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER 1234 LOT ADDRESS -??-? CITY LIMITS LINE SHADED AREA - PROPERTY L??J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ZONE LINE PETON W C 01 5304 ,0/07/93 p 5365 ,D/07/93 © 596. DB/15/96 REVISED: 8/20/2002 ZONING ATLAS NE 1 /4 OF SECTION 286B A 16 --29 S - 15 E 087C)a ej avow 40o ozo "I Za?? ? 268A ? 26813 269A 9 cEOAR ST. CITY OF CLEARWATER \ 1 10 °? X10 1 ?? 6 ?S Qrf1 AND VEII(r" - 110 _ 7 1 i PINEUAS COUNTY, FLORIDA app m i OOe 001 8 1 roe I? 2 9 I00 101 2 9 ?, `?/ s PREPARED BV ? 005 ".A PUBWC WORKS ADMINISTRATION Clearwater Bay 101 F I Marble `?,J ?+ 7 rr aer S 8 000 ao+ M/p1 1 Ill 12$ a pro ENI NEERINC 2 MI J 8 wt 11 100 S NyriM 4ve.. CYevweler,'rL 33758 ? ?y GO rat a0r s b :°°I ae? 4 ?N 7 N4 m foie- 7 Ior ?? 9??ac?? p 10 iP 50oin?a Loo 1/angben/5 I p w s / 3 3 A 4 3 9 Is OirNOfiner. 4 s $ , 8 gg It r 0i 8 0 rr0 5 PUN10 Inlolmellpn Oola It turnlfMd by the City of Cloar,rollr I `( 23 t dro e/rE 1 w pp 9 ?at 7 PUDIIC Works Adm nlrlrolbn/Engimeerlnq. end must be amo led ,p >D old Used by the feN lenl with the Vndlmlond'mt the sate 6 I 4 tl Q T2 t4 to 1 a p. SI S t0 1 $ ?r 5 I7 I rmelved was cauci% for the Purpose or due G1+9 ft f groehtc rrr 9 eaI f Mr ® K 3 A 4 Infrost-We Inventory. As such, the City of CkorwDler pWAA D® 21 i5 yO8 2 2 9 en _2 41/03 mokrr no worrontles, Oxpreaaed or Implied, c nrinq the I 2 4b 3 rwe a rn MCNOLSON STS[D 12 occuracY. comoletmeas, relloblllly. or ruitobptly of thh data for 20 n. 7 411r S 10. k R 11 any other porllcular wr. furthermore. the Clly of Clcorwoler SEMINOLE ST ` a. e0e 6 + } e 404 14 12 11I 10 PWA/E assumes nD Ifobnxy whoft- ossodaled with the uSe Of ~17 ' < ?s8 4 f3 Dr mhuse of Such dol.. t2 BOAT 112/NCHING "'s? 0p` a sass a'?1 7 alit 4 ib 7 aor s °° 1° N07E,' Ganges. 6 1 6 e0r I00 18 19 BO 9 This AND, pogo I. I.bj-i to perlDdie \\? $?42/D2i iSENINaE 7„ E 5 $ 8? e01Q8 5? a ° geoo 15 I6 Ol Q 8 rDr MfDrmDuen bobs l', estr Wee -ie.plcose n rWA/E or a s e R R 7 Aare il 1 ?,"rvNr r-en STREET 4 .e ob m I . N w.11 .s,1 42/01 IS 51 8 8 BSra r0rrr$9'? e18 g 1 R` • ?? 11/04 7 { 9 2 `° /? p I2 2 812 ? ? ror 2 roe 70° t0 17 O / f9 10 0 3 IAr. H. >ar roa 3 6 3 +Do 11 I 4 3 >oe ? ? ror j1 k/16 20 a 5 4 aoe t O ELDRIDGE nslo >01 e 2 oa 4 5 ror -TOWNHOUSE -isue a 42/01 roe r? _e ra! >0r 41/06 +Ot 1p' 12 is fo1 `1 m I 9no 0 100 200 0000 600 80-87 R $ d ;roo " ?? ' 41/os roa s z1 ¦?/ ® D>s roa S ' 1 roo 100 $-w fi4 ` •Iro, 41 O9 ro ELDRIDGE S 'lv R ,roa 7 SCALE: 1" = 400' R 1 + . i e s rl/ 12 t 3 Vem is 21 25 51 o STREET 2 aaatt 14 eeats Y3 Mso? ecos 80 LEGEND 34 Boa 4 101 D Y ti ro 2 O A O m 5t ea 63 rae I rlr. No. IS— GOVT L07 3 5 Boo Boa 9 18 4 p 104 21 28 NI 33 roa a IS tot eo 52 97 5or y ror ° 6 17 32 s 61 . ¢ of 5 O BLOCK NUMBER GOVT LOT 4 6 0 7 t IO L - 4 629 roa 01 14 eaO r 53 58 eoe 65 eel 2 1o N N - --- Om 'B roe Dy Ot 19 of }1 ror 42 434 1' 66101 d Ig ? 1234 LOT CITY LIMITS ADDRESS Il.r. Nu 17.101 HARRINGTONart °119 B 60p ert 'NIGH ON gYAPLE 11 5-77 6ro tit 9 ale 1 `o a ..1I . - 8 LINE -------- 7 on 2 & m B rra 19 REED ° b ? $07 e0 i arrQ 18 2 $D SUB. 3 2 r---I SHADED AREA - PROPERTY 5 HARBOR BLUFF 3 601, 9-107 L -? OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS U.F. No. 17.422 eau 006 3 $? 7 Baer ao+ 17 y 4 eo T 4 CONDO 3 4 4 E dos 4 1 385 sot ao}6 CONDO D aj 43 A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX 1iI I 21-31 2 1 HARTS 2ND 60d 5 bN Q a 5 6 a ---- sao 4v 500 400 2 = ' too , 14 6 40 .?. N fit If ' CITY OWNED PROPERTY -------- GEORGIA STREET 4 4m 3 7 40 8 !ve !0 10, 7 ?e 496 8 1 4 13 6 4a ra a roa 40 MDR ZONING DESIGNATION N -_.-- 9 8 w • 3- !0e 12 40 for S9 D --"- 4 7 I 5 lot roo FS5 ZONE LINE I I.Ir. No. 1,,1'1 10 r0a51 2roe 9 11 t0 AB.n 1 r I p 10 ? SIGN SHOP - - - H c3 pop 4 3 101 8 a S v? ^ 410 2 37 < --{Lt. No 11,518 43/04 Ore l !or 491 en 2 N Bead-t39 v4c. STREET 38 I -- < iblam ro . a SID $ EE PF7DS1 818 t+?' u.r. No 11.506 43/08 1 e0I oe O ------ - eH 13 slid AdK{ 2 7 8 8 7 6 d1 4J O 5370 00/08/'7 e0r 5 001/ } 19 5782 00/16/gI t? 145- ® 5311 p0/p/116/93 ------- A L5 na aar 4 C 2 P "R, ? bIN Q 5799 11/15/93 6 eo/ N 3 Boa 3 t 2 4 in 000 O pro B 32 (}1 Son 11/07/97 r.ls. No 1T,ST R7:7,VE0 OPTS Or 2 1 ! O M 5131 m/19/os -- Co-O NRP Soo 1 p0 A Sol 1 5 1 N 3. so h 5 31 ID 5961 0°/5/96 ----- 1111 R 0 6 p o tl f t p m Z Bpd M 6503 D3/oa/ob 4 ? T 8 i 3 N '. 2 3D .. L>PIN°oN "::SF:a"?aR ®Ba39D.n9o I ® its e - 72 29 S 10 9 B 7 6 7 ro -; I a T .w..11.a.u.. u? 5 8 5 8 0 7 8 s 6 E. H 11 A B4 2 j? 63/07 }g{i ut o .1m HAYDEN 17i 6 I aa- Isa: Ss 7CD dj 1 e5 27 ae m °2m N8 /000 1 92 3 1 s ' } S ,0 1 3 14 sal 88 too REVISED: too 3 >; 3 F tot e 8 Boo 6 ?1 1 `` 3 4 00 6 5 8 58 2 1 ty ` 21 DIM 35 ' a tv >? 700 1'a 7 z5 I z 5/01/2001 ? 7f1-.» A td - - - _ ' S Sao-am 9.6 1191-557 /07 t1 9 12/08: 59 ZONING ATLAS 1 Ss 8 7 d? D m r?p I INS•t3e 12 IJ6 let 1 b E b b ? }? In 500:-300 12108 055 12/os rte / 9 6 7 9 7 6 5 4 32 1 7 ,o $ '7 SE 1/4 OF SECTION ? ' ? 286A '7? a +. i' Ln' 4r ff SO LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW November 16, 2005 CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Mr. Mark Rieker Rieker & Associates, Inc. 1020 North Orlando Avenue, Suite 150 Maitland, FL 32751 Re: FLD2005-08084 - 400 Cleveland Street (CW Acqua and the Downtown Plaza) Dear Mr. Rieker: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On November 15, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 square feet of non-residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the permitted height from 30 feet to 380 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 27 feet for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-903.C. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 4.05-acres subject property is located within the Downtown (D) District and the Central Business District (CBD) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property and development proposal is subject to the requirements of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines contained therein as it is located within the Downtown Core character district; 3. That the development proposal includes the provision of 360 City controlled public parking as part of a separate development agreement; 4. That the development proposal' is consistent with the Visions, Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the Downtown Core character district; 5. That the development proposal is consistent with the Downtown Design Guidelines; That the proposed use of 36 dwelling units from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is consistent with the provisions of the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 6. That the development proposal is consistent with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project as per Section 2-903.C; 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability Criteria as per Section 3-913; and , BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYP HAMILTON, COLNCILMEMHER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMHER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILNIEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYiMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" * 4 A 8. That the development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of of Approval: 1. That all nonresidential uses proposed to be located on site are consistent with those permitted uses listed within the Community Development Code and the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan; 2. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff; 3. That a Transportation Impact Fee be paid, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. 5. That all utility equipment including but not limited to electrical and water meters is screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 6. That any/all wireless communication facilities to be installed concurrent with or subsequent to the construction of the subject development are screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable. 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That any/all future signage meets the requirements of Code and be architecturally integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the storefront windows are revised to consist of bulkheads and transoms to be consistent with the architectural style and the City's Downtown Design Guidelines; 12. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 15, 2006); 13. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within three years of issuance of the first building permit; 14. That all improvements be constructed in a single phase, or alternatively that the southern building (theatre) and requisite parking, including any and all public parking, along with any streetscaping adjacent thereto, be constructed as the first phase of the development. The streetscape may also be accomplished via a separate agreement with the City;. 15. That the recladding of the office building shall be commenced no later that the issuance of certificates of occupancy for 85% of the residential condominium units and shall be substantially complete within 24 months thereafter; and 16. That any dwelling units obtained from the Public Amenities Incentive Pool that are not built shall be returned to the Pool. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by November 15, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within three years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please, be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. A t The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 23, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefftaa,mvclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michae De t Planning Director S. (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationslCleveland 400 - Acqua (D) - ApprovedlCleveland Street 400 - Development Order.doc 1 A" 4-`. ?r 4 ? L 3 • • °'°"""4nw .. ` i:• .... +'r' iai wet -+?hM . Gilbert G .J# 'Ii-OD": ?09.S Ft Harrison ?tearwater; FL 33756, ~ - ?. _ -• i.=.'?'?+•'.'?'t.t..? "Stll?llf?ilill3i2?2?£fi1222IFiiF?l?l#3dli??l3#£31££??3}9£ill?i - i 109-Cleveland Street ;learwater, FL 33755 0 NOV 24305 Piv. 2 T ~? -8-47,48 -- PUBLIC! THEATER e OFFICE GARAGE ENTRY & EXIT i i it TO RNW it 4f RAW F 4 S 40 / PRIVATE C r ` GARAGE ENTRY! EXIT t s n M. ?jk FLUSH CURB RESIDENTIAL! RESTAURANT- DROP-OFF --- 7 I u== -_ - ---_ - 7 c- ' h Ulu 7 LIGHTED ` BOLLARDS PATIO AREA r, I? 1 .1 FLUSH CURB VALET DROP - OFF I I I I I I I I I I ?I I I I I I I THEATER I ENTRANCE I r I I I I I I 'I 'I I 1 I C- I ! a R w A 1 E R, F Lo R i DA OCT 2 0 2005 L ?. CW ACQUA AT THE DOWNTOWN PLA PI.ANNHNG DEPARTMENT CITY OF C1EAl2WATER II M 7 M. (L LU wO? I '\ X13 wl? alo olo WI W1? D U M A N A G E M EN 1, L L C O R I G I NA L "TERRA HOLE) INGS STREET LIGHTS (CITY OF CLEARWATER APPROVED) of Clearwater Mainstreet Clearwater Development Mixed-Use Project CRA/TIF Revenue Generation and Bonding Analysis Prepared for Mainstreet Clearwater Development,, LLC 206 S. Brand Blvd. Glendale, CA 91204 Prepared by: lorida Economic Advisors, LLC October, 2004 Revision FEA Job No. 04-01-01 rX Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Work Product Disclaimer 1 3.0 Overview of Community Redevelopment & TIF Financing 1 4.0 General Project Description & Key Assumptions 4 5.0 Tax Increment Revenue Projections & Bonding Estimates 6 CURRICULUM VITAE OF R. CHRISTOPHER JONES, PRESIDENT OF FLORIDA ECONOMIC ADVISORS, LLC 0 0 1 1...0: Report Introduction Mainstreet Clearwater Development, LLC (hereinafter referred to as MCD) retained Florida Economic Advisors, LLC to conduct a tax increment financing and bonding potential analysis on a mixed use project within the Downtown Clearwater CRA District in Clearwater, Florida. This report will evaluate the proposed development program of the MCD project, and subsequently estimate the incremental property tax revenue that would be generated from successful project development. This revenue could be used to issue bonds for key infrastructure improvements within the Downtown Community Redevelopment Area, established under statutory guidelines. 2.0: Work Product Disclaimer It is the policy of Florida Economic Advisors, LLC to present a work product disclaimer for all FEA-produced documents and sources of media where estimates of future economic and/or financial performance are provided. The disclaimer for this report is presented below: All tables, charts, forecasts and conclusions presented in this report are based on information provided by public and private sector sources that FLORIDA ECONOMIC ADVISORS, LLC assumes to be reliable. FLORIDA ECONOMIC ADVISORS, LLC makes no warronly, express or implied, regarding the accuracy or totality of data provided in this report. Future economic conditions not theorized in this analysis could substantially impact interest rates and the timing of urban development within the Downtown Clearwater area, resulting in future revenue streams and/or bonding capacity estimates that significantly deviate from those offered in this report. 3.0 CRAJIF Mechanics: An Overview of Community Redevelopment & Tax Increment Financing This section of the report covers the rationale and logistics of creating CRA's for purposes of financing urban redevelopment. The following subsections address the history, mechanics, and legislation pertaining to the establishment of a Community Redevelopment Area and the use of Tax Increment Financing. 3.1 History of Tax Increment Financing Tax increment financing was originally developed over 30 years ago as a method to meet the local match requirements of federal grant programs. With the reduction in federal funds available for local projects, however, tax increment financing is standing on its own as a method to finance local "WoFlorlda C1 C3 2 redevelopment. . Tax increment financing is controlled by state, not federal law. Because of this control, tax increment financing takes on a number of different techniques and appearances throughout the country. In Florida, tax increment financing is derived from the Community Redevelopment Act of 1969 which is codified as Part 3, Chapter 163 of Florida Statutes. This act provided for a combination of public and private redevelopment efforts, but did not authorize the use of tax increment financing. The Act was amended in 1977 to allow tax increment financing. Under the Statutes, municipalities must go through a number of steps to establish a redevelopment area and implement a tax increment district. In summary, a county or municipality must first adopt a resolution finding that one or more "Slum or Blighted Areas", or one or more areas in which there is a shortage of low to moderate income housing, exist and the rehabilitation, conservation or redevelopment of such areas is necessary in the interests of public health, safety, morals or welfare. After making the findings described above, the county or municipality can create a Community Redevelopment Agency ("CRA"). The CRA then carries out redevelopment activities working through the local planning agency. 3.2 The Role of the Community Redevelopment Agency The CRA may either be governed by a separate appointed board or the city or county commission may declare itself to be the CRA. The creating governing body then vests the CRA with all of the powers necessary to carry out the provisions of the Act, except the power to (1) designate slum and blighted areas for redevelopment, (2) hold public hearings, (3) grant final approval for a community redevelopment plans, (4) authorize the issuance of revenue bonds, and (5) to approve acquisition and disposal of property within a community redevelopment area prior to the establishment of a Redevelopment Plan. These powers remain vested with the governing body that created the CRA. The CRA functions within the local government. It coordinates the preparation of a plan for redevelopment of the community redevelopment area and submits the plan to the local planning agency. The local planning agency then has 60 days to review the plan as to its conformity with the comprehensive plan. After the 60 day period, or earlier if it has received the planning agency's comments, the CRA then formally considers the plan. If it is approved, the CRA submits the plan to the local governing body. After public notice and public hearings, the governing body may approve the Florida Economic 19 Advisors, LLC 3 plan. If it is approved, the CRA is then directed to carry out the plan. In order to be approved, the plan must meet the requirements listed in F.S. 163.362. These requirements include information on and detailed descriptions of the boundaries of the redevelopment areas as well as the reasons for the boundaries, the amount of open space in the area, the number of dwelling units, any building restrictions, detailed information on any existing or proposed low or moderate income housing, any publicly-funded capital projects, assurance as to future controls over the area, assurances that replacement housing will be available for anyone displaced, detailed projections of costs and the proposed method of financing, and a timetable for the completion of the redevelopment. Once the plan has been approved, a Trust Fund for each Community Redevelopment Area may be established. The revenues for the Trust Fund are obtained by allocating any increases in taxable assessed value to the area. The assessed value of the district is "frozen" and any increases (the tax increment revenues) are available for improvements to the area. The tax collector collects the entire properly tax and subtracts the tax on the base value which is available for general government purposes. Of the remaining tax increment revenues, as much as 95% may be deposited to the Trust Fund. The remaining 5% is kept by the local government as a collection fee. As listed in F.S. 163.387(6), the monies in the Trust Fund can be used for the following purposes: 1) Administrative expenses necessary to the implementation of the Community Redevelopment Area, 2) Expenses of redevelopment planning, surveys and financial analysis, r 3) Acquisition of real property, 4) Site preparation including relocation of site residents, and 5) Issuance costs and principal and interest payments on any indebtedness. 6) Development of affordable housing within the CRA; and 7) The development of community policing innovations. According to F.S. 163.370(2), however, the funds may not be used for the following purposes: 1) To construct or expand administration buildings for public bodies unless each taxing authority involved agrees, 2) Any publicly-owned capital improvements which are not an integral part of the redevelopment if the improvements are normally financed by user fees, and if the improvements would have otherwise been made without the CRA within three years, or 3) General government operating expenses unrelated to the CRA.. Florida Economic Advisors, LLC 0 0 4 3.3 CRA Leaal Status The validity of the CRA's and their ability to utilize Tax Increment Financing was upheld in 1980 when the Supreme Court of Florida affirmed a circuit court validation of bonds proposed for issuance by the Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency under the Act. The court upheld the constitutionality of the Act and the use of tax increment financing. Challenges had been based on Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency's authorization to commence bond issues, the use of eminent domain for community redevelopment, and a challenge that the bonds would actually be paid from ad valorem tax revenues which had not been approved under referendum. The legality of the public and private partnership utilized for redevelopment of a Community Redevelopment Area was upheld in 1982 when the Supreme Court of Florida affirmed validation of bonds proposed for issuance by Lakeland Downtown Development Authority. This project would include resale to a private developer. The court held that the prospect of partial private ownership did not defeat the public purpose in eliminating slum or blighted areas and thus allowed the issue. The ability of CRA's to utilize Tax Increment Financing even at the expense of the taxing districts was upheld in 1986 when the Supreme Court of Florida affirmed a validation of bonds proposed by the City of Daytona Beach to finance the acquisition of construction of marina, streets, sidewalks, lighting and other improvements. The State Attorney had challenged that requiring the contribution of tax increment revenue funds from other taxing authorities, including the Ponce De Leon Port Authority, the East Volusia Mosquito Control District, the East Volusia Transportation Authority and the Halifax Hospital Medical Center is unconstitutional and that the project had no relationship to the purposes for which such entities are authorized to raise ad valorem tax revenues. The court held that it was within the legislative power to make community redevelopment one of the purposes of the special tax district. 4.0 General Project Description & Key Assumptions Based on information provided by MCD and its development consultants, the proposed project would be comprised of the following uses; 0 250 Condominium units 0 90,000 +/- square feet of retail 0 18,000 +/- square feet of mixed office 0 55,000 +/- square feet of cinema 0 1,145 +/- spaces of structured parking In total, the completed project would fall just shy of 1 million square feet in size. Florida Econom[C Advisors, LLC 5 The preliminary development cost for the project (net of parking square footage) has been estimated at $202 per square foot. FEA used this value to project a County appraised value of the project. Historically, County appraised values for income generating projects fall short of "true" project market values. Information provided in pages 140-149 of the Downtown Clearwater CRA Plan indicates full County and City operating millage participation, with an additional mill levied on behalf of the Downtown Development Board. In total, a 12.7450 millage levy is utilized for tax increment revenue generation. Other key assumptions are listed in the table below. Clearwater Downtown Community Redevelopment Area Clearwater, Florida Mainstreet Clearwater Development Project Uses Residential-Condo Retail Mixed Office Total Development, Less Theater Theater 385,000 sq, feet 90,000 sq. feet 18,000 sq. feet 493,000 sq. feet 55,000 sq. feet Estimated Development Cost Total Estimated Development Cost Particoatina CRA Millages City of Clearwater Operating Pinellas"County General Fund Downtown Development Board TOTAL Maximum Increment Available for Collection Assessed Value as a % of Development Cost Average Property Value Escalation Rate $201.99 per sq. foot $110,692,537 5.7530 5.9920 1.0000 12.7450 95.0% 100.0% 3.0% Sources: Pinellas County Property Appraiser, Mainstreet Clearwater Development LLC, City of Clearwater Economic Development Dept., FEA Florida Economic Advl._", LLC & ' 2) )0 E 6 5.0 Tax Increment Revenue Projections and Bonding Estimates This portion of., the analysis provides annualized 20-year estimates of tax increment revenue generated from proposed MCD project. In addition, hypothetical municipal bond issues have been constructed in order to gauge the amount of near-term construction dollars available for the development of project-supporting infrastructure. The project is assumed to commence construction in late 2004 or early 2005, with buildout by early 2007. Under this scenario, it would be expected that the project's value would reach the local tax roll in the 2008 fiscal year. For purposes of this analysis, all new development is recognized as incremental revenue. At a full 95% collection rate (per Chapter 163, Florida Statutes), FEA estimates that total tax increment revenue generated by the project through year 2025 would exceed $32.3 million. The table below presents the projected streams of incremental revenue from the project. Clearwater Downtown Community Redevelopment Area Clearwater, Florida Mainstreet Clearwater Development Project Projections of Incremental Taxable Value and CRA Revenue Generation Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20,12 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total Incremental valuation $0.00 $0.00 $114,013,313 $117,433,713 $120,956,724 $124,585,426 $128,322,988 $132,172,678 $136,137,858 $140,221,994 $144,428,654 $148,761,514 $153,224,359 $157,821,090 $162,555,722 $167,432,394 $172,455,366 $177,629,027 $182,957,898 $188,446,635 $2,669,557,352 95% of Incr. Valuation $0.00 $0.00 $108,312,647 $111,562,027 $114,908,888 $118,356,154 $121,906,839 $125,564,044 $129,330,965 $133,210,894 $137,207,221 $141,323,438 $145,563,141 $149,930,035 $154,427,936 $159,060,774 $163,832,598 $168,747,576 $173,810,003 $179,024,303 $2,536,079,484 Florlda Economic Advisors, LLC Revenue Generation $0.00 $0.00 $1,380,445 $1,421,858 $1,464,514 $1,508,449 $1,553,703 $1,600,314 $1,648,323 $1,697,773 $1,748,706 $1,801,167 $1,855,202 $1,910,858 $1,968,184 $2,027,230 $2,088,046 $2,150,688 $2,215,208 $2,281,665 $32,322,333 7 The following chart on this page illustrates the sources and uses of funds on a 20-year bond issue. The bond assumes an early 2006 issuance, with a 6.25% coupon, 2 years of capitalized interest, and a 1 % return for purposes of arbitrage calculations on capitalized interest and debt service reserve earnings. Issuing 20-year debt on future tax increment revenues of $32.3 million will allow the CRA to generate approximately $14.28 million in up-front revenues for infrastructure improvements. Clearwater Downtown Community Redevelopment Area Clearwater, Florida 6.25% Coupon Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2006 20 Year Issue Sources & Uses of Funds Sources Par Amount of Bonds $19,038,643.02 $19,038,643.02 Uses Costs of Issuance (In( Printing, Underwiter) Debt Service Reserve Capitalized Interest Construction Fund ;ludes Legal, 2.50% of par $475,966.08 10.00% of par $1,903,864.30 2?years $2,379,830.38 $14,278,982.26 $19,038,643.02 A level debt service schedule is used to estimate annual gross and net debt service. Florida Economic Advisors, LLC 0 0 8 Clearwater Downtown Community Redevelopment Area Clearwater, Florida 6.25% Coupon Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2006 Debt Service Sched ule Gross Cap. I DS Reserve Net Date Principal Interest Debt Srv. Arbitrage Arb./Payout Debt Srv. October 1 2006 $594,958 $594,958 $11,899 $9,519 $573,539 April 1 2007 $594,958 $594,958 $8,984 $9,519 $576,454 October 1 2007 $594,958 $594,958 $6,054 $9,519 $579,384 April 1 2008 $594,958 $594,958 $3,109 $9,519 $582,329 October 1 2008 $594,958 $594,958 $9,519 $585,438 April 1 2009 $601,583 $594,958 $1,196,540 $9,519 $1,187,021 October 1 2009 $576,158 $576,158 $9,519 $566,639 April 1 2010 $639,182 $576,158 $1,215,340 $9,519 $1,205,821 October 1 2010 $556,184 $556,184 $9,519 $546,664 April 1 2011 $679,131 $556,184 $1,235,314 $9,519 $1,225,795 October 1 2011 $534,961 $534,961 $9,519 $525,442 April 1 2012 $721,576 $534,961 $1,256,537 $9,519 $1,247,018 October 1 2012 $512,412 $512,412 $9,519 $502,892 April 1 2013 $766,675 $512,412 $1,279,086 $9,519 $1,269,567 October 1 2013 $488,453 $488,453 $9,519 $478,934 April 1 2014 $814,592 $488,453 $1,303,045 $9,519 $1,293,526 October 1 2014 $462,997 $462,997 $9,519 $453,478 April 1 2015 $865,504 $462,997 $1,328,501 $9,519 $1,318,982 October 1 2015 $435,950 $435,950 $9,519 $426,431 April 1 2016 $919,598 $435,950 $1,355,548 $9,519 $1,346,029 October 1 2016 $407,213 $407,213 $9,519 $397,693 April 1 2017 $977,073 $407,213 $1,384,285 $9,519 $1,374,766 October 1 2017 $376,679 $376,679 $9,519 $367,160 April 1 2018 $1,038,140 $376,679 $1,414,819 $9,519 $1,405,300 October 1 2018 $344,237 $344,237 $9,519 $334,718 April 1 2019 $1,103,024 $344,237 $1,447,261 $9,519 $1,437,742 October 1 2019 $309,768 $309,768 $9,519 $300,248 April 1 2010 $1,171,963 $309,768 $1,481,730 $9,519 $1,472,211 October 1 2020 $273,144 $273,144 $9,519 $263,625 April 1 2021 $1,245,210 $273,144 $1,518,354 $9,519 $1,508,835 October 1 2021 $234,231 $234,231 $9,519 $224,712 April 1 ; 2022 $1,323,036 $234,231 $1,557,267 $9,519 $1,547,748 October 1 2022 $192,886 $192,886 $9,519 $183,367 April 1 2023 $1,405,726 $192,886 $1,598,612 $9,519 $1,589,093 October 1 2023 $148,957 $148,957 $9,519 $139,438 April 1 2024 $1,493,584 $148,957 $1,642,541 $9,519 $1,633,021 October 1 2024 $102,283 $102,283 $9,519 $92,763 April 1 2025 $1,586,933 $102,283 $1,689,215 $9,519 $1,679,696 October 1 2025 $52,691 $52;691 $9,519 $43,172 April 1 2026 $1,686,116 $52,691 $1,738,807 $1,903,864 surplus TOTALS $19,038,643 $15,588,152 $ 34,626,795 $30,046 $2,275,118 $ 32,486,688 Net Debt Service on Bonds: $32,486,688 Less DS reserve surplus $165,057 Sum of payments necessary to retire Debt Service: $32,321,631 Florida Economic Advisors, LLC ` Florida • Economic Advisors, LLC R. CHRISTOPHER JONES President and Chief Economist PROFESSIONAL PROFILE 'A Master's-educated economist and Ph.D. studies qualifier, Chris Jones serves as the President and Chief Economist of Florida Economic Advisors, LLC. Chris is one of Central Florida's most experienced regional economists. In addition to his advanced degrees in business and economics, he has over 11 years experience as an economic and financial consultant in Central Florida. His private sector background includes tenure as an associate economist with Fishkind & Associates and as the founder and Senior Economist of MSCW Economics in Orlando. Chris' public sector service includes a term as the Senior Economic Advisor to the City of Orlando, Florida. With more than 300 studies in his consulting portfolio, Chris has provided services for various branches of Federal, State, and Local Government, including the Executive office of the Governor and over 25 units of local government in Florida. Chris is widely recognized as one of Florida's leading experts in fiscal policy, serving for two years on Governor Jeb Bush's Fiscal Impact Advisory Committee. He is also considered to be one of the state's premier advisors on affordable housing policy. Chris served for several years as a founding member of East Central Florida Regional Planning Council's Affordable Housing Resource Group. -AREAS OF EXPERTISE & CONSULTING PRACTICE _ ................... ........._.............._..._................_..................._.:....._................... ...............__....._..._. Chris is actively involved in the following areas of economic consulting: • Residential & Nonresidential Market Demand Analysis • Economic Impact Studies • Regional Economic Forecasting and Long-Range Projections • Fiscal Impact Analysis and Governmental Budgeting • Property Value Analysis and Development Cash Flow Modeling • Land Use Analysis and Optimization Studies • Consumer Research and Surveying RELEVANT EXPERIENCE & SELECTED MAJOR CLIENTS Chris' public sector client list has included numerous branches of Federal, state, and local government. In addition, his private sector experience includes consulting for such major clients as Westinghouse, Lockheed-Martin, ITT, the Pulte Home Corporation, Blockbuster Entertainment and the Trammell Crow Company. Chris has performed economic research and/or expert witness testimony in over 40 civil litigation cases, involving eminent domain and business damages. A list of selected major clients are provided below: Florida Economic Advisors, LLC RELEVANT EXPERIENCE & SELECTED MAJOR CLIENTS (CONTINUED) *Executive Office of the Governor (FL) o FL Department of Transportation o Orange County, Florida o Brevard County, Florida *City Of Orlando, Florida o City of Lakeland, Florida o City of DeBary, Florida *Maury Carter & Associates *Carolina Florida, Inc. o WTC Tampa oSt. Johns County, Florida o Walton County, Florida o City of Jacksonville, Florida *City of Lake Mary, Florida *Don M. Casto Organization o LB Enterprises oScott LLP oSt. Joe Company EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy program, Business Administration/Economics, University of South Florida (Commencing August 2003); Master of Business Administration, Roy E. Crummer Graduate School of Business, Rollins College (1992); Bachelor of Science in Food & Resource Economics, University of Florida (1990) PAST & PRESENT PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS & ADVISORY COMMITTEES Governor's Fiscal Impact Advisory Committee The Urban Land Institute The National Association for Business Economics The American Planning Association East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Affordable Housing Resource Group PUBLICATIONS & MEDIA Chris' economic commentary has appeared in the following publications: *Orlando Sentinel *Orlando Magazine *Daytona Beach News-Journal; *Naples Daily News o Lakeland Ledger *Florida Real Estate Journal o Orlando Business Journal o Florida APA News *Daily Commercial o Longboat Key Observer *Ft. Myers News-Press o Palatka Daily News oMid-Florida HBA Magazine PRESENTATIONS Chris has been seen on WOFL FOX-35 providing televised economic commentary. In addition, he has been a guest speaker commenting on economic policy issues before the following civic and professional organizations: The Urban Land Institute; ...... ..... ' Florida Economic Advisors, LL .PRESENTATIONS (CONTINUED) The-Central Florida Chapter of Certified Public Accountants; Leadership Winter Park; The American Planning Association; Leadership Orlando; West Volusia Community Outreach Forum; West Orange County Community Outreach Forum; The Oviedo Chamber of Commerce; and The Oviedo Rotary Club. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Senior Economic Advisor - City of Orlando, Florida A principal role as the City of Orlando's senior economic advisor involved the review and analysis of development proposals targeted at the Downtown Orlando CRA. Activities included analysis of developer pro-formas, development of counter-proposals, and negotiation with private sector developers regarding City participation in CRA development projects. Participated in the formulation of CRA development programs totaling almost 2 million square feet of space with an estimated value exceeding $250 million. Mercury Advisors - Tampa, Florida (Grand Central at Kennedy) Economic consultant for the developer of a 1 proposed million square foot mixed- use project in Tampa's Channelside CRA district. Performed economic and market research, fiscal evaluations, and tax increment revenue forecasts. The project is proposed to include upscale residential, commercial, and office uses, and is positioned to be the centerpiece of a revitalized Channelside district. The project approval process is ongoing.. The results of this research and analysis will lead to further master planning and infrastructure programming efforts by the City of Tampa. City of DeBary, Florida Economic consultant for a CRA feasibility study along the US Highway 17-92 corridor in DeBary. The project is ongoing. Major work efforts include market research, economic forecasts, fiscal impact analysis, and tax increment revenue projections for the proposed study area. The results of this research and analysis will lead to additional planning and CRA formation efforts by the City. City of Leesburg, Florida Economic consultant for a feasibility study that evaluated 2,000+ acres of previously undeveloped property in close proximity to the Florida Turnpike., Performed market research, economic forecasts, and land use allocations for the project study area. The results of this research and analysis will lead to further master planning and infrastructure programming efforts by the City. Florida Economic Advisors, LLC RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE (CONTINUED) City of Lake /Mary, Florida °Principal consultant and project manager for a multi-phase downtown development feasibility study. Performed market research, land use selection, infrastructure costing, and bond financing models for the City's 80-acre downtown district. Also performed research on Federal, state, and local grant and loan programs available for municipal redevelopment projects. The results of this research and analysis led to the award of a $200,000 Community Development Block Grant from the State of Florida for financing downtown infrastructure. Polk County/Lakeland EDC - Lakeland Village Development Feasibility & Preliminary CRA Revenue Projections Performed economic and market research, fiscal evaluations, and tax increment revenue forecasts for a proposed 80-acre mixed-use lifestyle center in the southern Downtown area of Lakeland. The project is proposed to include over 500,000 square feet of upscale residential, commercial, and office uses, and is positioned to be a catalyst for the revitalization of southern Lakeland. The project approval process continues. Brevard County-Commercial Demand Analysis Conducted a countywide market study commissioned by Brevard County which analyzed the demand and potential capture rates within the region for a proposed 1.1 million square foot super regional mall and associated Power Center space located in Cocoa, Florida. The results of the market research indicated a 15-year need within the region for almost 2 million square feet of regional and super regional shopping center space. The results of this study were used by Brevard County to provide feedback and comments to the City of Cocoa on the feasibility of the proposed Brevard Crossings Mall. Farmer Baker Balks Architects Inc. Architecture • Interior Design • Urban Plannipg MA rec*t- -IL [43 J 1k) ) YA Cob?, Y'vmus - ce?---.,...._ ? Arc ' ?-K arwater 300 S. Orange Avenue //? _?? Suite 900 Orlando, Florida 32801 407.926.3000 Tel. (J(J ??? p 407.926.3390 Fax '(9 z „l5? V6`_ !X- Timothy R. Baker ?j Principal AA0002981 Heights Workshop #1 Day #1 July 29, 2004 Location: City Hall Date Time of Meeting 07/29/04 (Thursday) 8:30 AM 1. 8:30 am Introductions II. 8:40 am Objectives for Workshop #1 III. 8:50 am Measuring Success- Planning Committee IV. 9:30 am Review City's planned improvements V. 10:00 am Review site analysis diagram VI. 10:30 am Review master planning program requirements VII. 11:30 am Discuss Architectural Styles VIII. 12:00 pm Discuss agenda for next session IX. 12:15 pm Meeting adjourned C U4bs)4kg*?? q-,-' -70?0?0 000' ?. Mt9A -?o oya *?u 2so vnt? 70,069 -9o XD4r ?co a-?ws ?vnssvlk?- d C? SffJP"1- SwVQA Gmrualu z, a. 7wnF?zYR( V SOYNe YtSI;PS wa?ctad ? {wd m? .?_ _ I?i,Y4- t_uS tsSue Rab led( G?rd;,T.. ?- 7.'1 rv.lwd V? }w?i?,_w/_Ber3h WeAV60 sx?z,? --- Y?oved??ira?, nvi2 °??w o,?rpid _?nSfetsS([9res_ V w _a4a .a- - - too s ue?d ? ?oekaP aAdti?peA1_?rcrss- _ -7j?&v6 -ol W4b (A-A -oilv\ Flvvisaw... PaPFa'd-?c2_(d%? .. O.Ojow?___Jt -14 ?'??-U-W4A'N'iP '4!LL'(E TS ?10 ?(LL L C ` Niay_W_look,?{' ft? M- I ??s_?ritvn3?a9 ?OUwi? aVl- u? _l(V ?-? ? I?b!Y=son. u a4S Ua?'sto e+??- j? .f gyol-? R 71N- - 41- 111100 Or",pp Ile- goo l p v 11 tt {?,:?? l I ? ? S , ""try sFr /rte; unior gat.; ?;!;? ,'fin ? ?. , •? t? '?. het 1 ?y W t ?y ^?t • u ??? o? I 'v k v a ^, a??f ?? srj l' GpWp M ? ' ? t is Lame Nod I --.Nod T 3 llwo? f? III-?_, --Tl- ff iRkbL A. _-0 "WIN i4A-4 _ _ t i I ?. I 34Q-CU?> NA t\ w ?. 1-1 I !1 ?? / WIWI s \ _ ,rr^ - ?y7 ?` A - -?? via 71 n n-n nn n-n nn t--, r-----? I - _ _ r --- ! i 1 1?? I I l I I I - Tll T1 -1 Tl 1111 Tl TIT] TIT] n fl in Pan- mm'r9mmI ??IIIrr?ee1yy11 `IITIy19 ? 11!1! - ?- t': ??.?u,.?rr?_ ?7 I I? I f 11 I u? 11? I I I I I, 1 .: -- I III I1I1 *Pd 71 12 (r _et Po If, 10 if l *? ! I l 14 /r !r !! if l! 1_? 10 a? ?e (r eo? r ?. .04 elf f f? ?? * f (' f( i' !4 r tr ?, f rr e5f lo 0 C'. 11 'Zi 1, 1>... 1 :'- ?/ Tip" 12X8 AND 8X8 'ATHENS STONE' PAVERS , IN 45 DEGREE ANGLE, COLOR. PS CORA WITH CORAL HUNT, BY TREMRON CO. FT. HARRISON AVENUE k ?l MEDJ(?OL DATE PALM 6 ' D I A 1l tt - C - & M - B - O - T R E E E GRATE B ?lY U R B A N ACCESSORIES PER CLEVELANp STREET STREETSCAPE PLAN .P W W N --- -- L 7w W W LAI— J SERVICE ENTRNACE - FI IICH fIIGR (6)PARALLEL PAI SPACES 12X8 AND 8X8 IN 45 DEGREE AN WITH CORAL HUB PEDESTRIAN CR( LAP PAVERS PER APPROVED CROS P TO 131d RESIDENT ENTRNACE FLUSH CURB PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE ENTRNAC -- -=-_----_ VED IG?OT FT RSR IGPPROPER _.1111..._..111111 OUTDOOOR CAFE ZONE CUSTOM BENCH DECORATIVE STREET LIGHT Ng` II :NS STONE' PAVERS, E, COLOR; PS CORAL BY TREMRON CO. "IHQ K , VEHICU- TY-OF: CLEARWATER ALK PAVERS ?HIGHRISE LIVE OAK 4'X4' TREE GRATE BY -- URBAN ACCESSORIES -WASHINGTONIA PALM -PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK - V LAR PAVERS PER CITY OF CL APPROVED CROSSWALK PAVE -PEDESTRIAN PAVERS, 12X12 DEGREE ANGLE, COLOR; RIC( STONE' FINISH, BY DC KERCF II LIGHTED BOLLARD PAVER BANDING MEDJOOL DATE PALM IN 8'X8' RAISED PLANTING AREA 12X8 AND 8X8 'ATHENS STONE' PAVERS, IN 45 DEGREE ANGLE, COLOR: PS CORAL WITH CORAL HUNT, BY TREMRON CO. DECORATIVE STREET- LIGHT PER CITY OF CLEARWATER APPROVED LIGHT FIX- TURES PEDESTRIAN PAVERS, 12X12 PAVERS.AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE, COLOR. RICO,'KERCHOFF STONE' FINISH, BY DC KERCHOFF CO. 6' DIA, COMBO TREE GRATE BY URBAN ACCESSORIES PER CLEVELAND STREET STREETSCAPE PLAN TERRA HOLDGS L , C W A Q U A M ANAGEMENTI,NLLC CLEARWATER, FL C., L?., ()5 kw&, ?kv. 4ye-ur,&? -?iC?°rogz, Ilya? ?,,a?hm c? vvw?m4e?a.? ?ssuea ?? r-P,I?a^?. ??mw?e ?7t' -h?? ?04: C!? Hof-acc.i (6A . _ !? vn Dec. +0 Qs?_ (M..? YD ? S -11 PLIAA? CLUL-Oj COL -Jim `?nTla r? ?? r A A ?_ _(( c4LY_CS-SAY su_cdMr.?.gy? ?J>^ sw_v ? . JaA) 6ZA- a X17 S ?fr p7?? Ja Clayton, Gina From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 10:34 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Acqua Project FYI -----Original Message----- From: Bruch, Tracey Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 9:59 AM To: 'Mark Rieker' Cc: Rice, Scott; Quillen, Michael; Arasteh, Mahshid; Walter Pestrak Subject: RE: Acqua Project Mark: I understand your deadlines and will attempt to provide some preliminary comments. However, it is the City's desire to retain a parking design consultant as an Owner's Agent to review the plans more thoroughly. This may take a few weeks. My primary concern is the stated efficiency of 550 sq. ft per space due to column placement (dictated from the condo tower) and your footprint. The engineering of the column placement is what we would like evaluated by our rep. I can, however, tell you now that we would require the following for the operation of the facility: 1. Garage Management office space w/ Handicap accessible restrooms for staff. Office area to be approx. 20' x 201, not including restrooms. This area will accommodate staff management functions and computerized revenue control equipment, etc. 2. Maintenance / Storage area approx. 20' x 20' for storage of equipment, garage supplies, utility vehicle, etc. 3. Ability to communicate the facility with other City parking facilities via the City's fiber optic line. 4. Islands for cashier booths must be 6' wide and handicap accessible (ramped). These are just some initial thoughts until we have more detailed plans with dimensions and we have some time to review. Tracey -----Original Message----- From: Mark Rieker [mailto:mrieker@riekerassociates.com] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:39 AM To: Bruch, Tracey Cc: Rice, Scott; Quillen, Michael; Arasteh, Mahshid; Walter Pestrak Subject: RE: Acqua Project Tracey, Thanks for your response to Walter on Monday. As you may recall, we are on a very limited time schedule for the submission of our Development Application which is due for delivery to the City on August 25th. I certainly understand your desire to retain a consultant to represent the City, and agree that it is probably a good idea. However, I need to point out that in order to effectively respond to any major 1 design-related issues for things like physical ramping, floor to floor heights, location of major circulation paths, or positioning of spaces within the structural grid, we would need to have the comments from you or your consultant no later than Tuesday, August 16th. Fortunately, there are many other elements of the garage design that are not impacted by the submission deadline such as operational equipment specifications, security components, lighting, signage, internal traffic control, traffic coatings, etc. and thus they can be handled during the next couple of months without significant impact to either the basic garage design or the schedule. Yesterday we received preliminary comments from Robert Tefft and Scott Rice on the drawings we distributed in last week's pre-application conference; and these comments were very helpful in understanding their perspective on certain functional issues, handicapped space concerns, pedestrian pathways, and vehicular traffic-flow suggestions for the garage. BBA is reviewing these comments now (along with a little surprise we received from the land surveyor yesterday, which will likely change our perimeter layout slightly). We will forward any and all changes to you upon their completion to ensure that you have the most up-to-date information available. Can you let me know if you think that the response timeframe mentioned above will work? If not, we may need to discuss how our submission is handled relative to parking design during the DRC process. We really can't afford to go outside of our current timing due to the potential for extended delays during the holidays if we don't make the 8/25 deadline. Thanks, Mark -----Original Message----- From: Walter Pestrak [mailto:wpestrak@bakerbarriosarchitects.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 1:52 PM To: Tracey.Bruch@myClearwater.com Cc: Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com; Michael.Quillen@myClearwater.com; Mahshid.Arasteh@myClearwater.com Subject: RE: Acqua Project Thanks Tracey, If I can be of help to clarify anything on.the design, please let me know. Walter Pestrak, AIA Baker Barrios Architects -----Original Message----- From: Tracey.Bruch@myClearwater.com [mailto:Tracey.Bruch@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:25 PM To: Walter Pestrak Cc: Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com; Michael.Quillen@myClearwater.com; Mahshid.Arasteh@myClearwater.com Subject: Acqua Project Walter: In response to your request, the Eng/Parking System cannot provide sufficient comments concerning the functional design and operational requirement until we have had time to accurately review the site plans including the schematic and conceptual drawings. We will also be retaining a parking consultant as an "Owner's Agent" to represent the City's interests. Tracey Bruch Tracey Bruch, Parking Manager (727) 562-4771 tracey.bruch@myclearwater.com C.W. Acqua at the Downtown Plaza Outline Exterior Wall Material Specifications August 10, 2005 Condominium Building Podium Base 1. Masonry patterned Pre-Cast concrete panel plinth to watermark molding Podium Wall 2. Masonry patterned Pre-Cast concrete panels and coping 3. Aluminum and Glass (Clear) Storefront 4. Aluminum and Glass Canopies 5. Galvanized Steel (Painted) grillage to secure garage openings Condominium Tower 7 to 11 6. Aluminum and Glass (Tinted with E rating on #3 surface) Window-Wall 7. Aluminum and Glass (Tinted Opaque) Curtain-Wall 8. Pre-Cast concrete panels and coping 9. Glass (Tinted) and Aluminum frame balcony railings 10. Concrete and Steel Cornice structure with Aluminum Cladding Condominium Tower 12 to 28 11. Aluminum and Glass (Tinted with E rating on #3 surface) Curtain-Wall and Window-Wall 12. Aluminum and Glass (Tinted Opaque) Curtain-Wall 13. Pre-Cast concrete panels and Coping 14. Glass (Tinted) and Aluminum frame balcony railings 15. Concrete and Steel Cornice structure with Aluminum Cladding Condominium Tower 29-33 16. Aluminum and Glass (Tinted with E rating on #3 surface) Curtain-Wall and Window-Wall 17. Aluminum and Glass (Tinted Opaque) Curtain-Wall 18. Pre-Cast concrete panels and Coping 19. Glass (Tinted) and Aluminum frame balcony railings 20. Concrete and Steel Cornice structure with Aluminum Cladding ACQUA & THE DOWNTOWN PLAZA Parking Table Required Spaces Spaces Ratio Required Provided Theater 55,000 sf 4 220 220 Retail 35,000 sf 4 140 140 Office* 88,000 sf 2.275 200 200 Residences 245 units 1.5 368 470 *Note: Office ratio is grandfathered to current parking count per development agreement 11 A RETAIL SPACE #1 TRUCK DOCK ECURITY J J OFFICE 0 0 FILM VAULT MECH. AREA ESCALATOR E2 cc STORAGE o TUP- S. ELEV. LOBBY P J W ESCALATOR RETAIL SPACE #2 00 RETAIL SPACE #4 0 00 Osceola Street Al LEVEL 1 RETAIL SPACE FLOOR PLAN OPTION 6 1' . sro?er 100 Red mom" 91nM MIh 100 Tom, pbddB ssm 911.949.1900 W 911,949.1101 Fax 9m19i bM@mMbwdwm wwwdbbmGbAm RETAIL SPACE #3 CW Acqua at the 505 Downtown Plaza OSCEOLA STREET « SUBJECT TO CHANCE OR MODFICATIONS BY DEVELOPER OR ARCIBIECT .. C EARWATER, FLORIDA EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING 4?p PARKING ??P?pJE Gp?Op?\ Osceola Street i i • J I I Al I LEVEL 2 THEATER FLOOR PLAN - OPTION 6 10o led sea" Sked SMM we Baker Tom% nod" new 618./WOM TN Barrios 91SAW&UM It= 11-mum ? Architects A#AN CW Acqua at the 0 50' 75' Downtown Plaza OSCEOLA STREET ?. SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR MODFICATIONS BY DEVELOPER OR ARCMMCT » CLEARWATER, FLORIDA ATE. 08.09.0; aOJECT,030340. aAwN - JT ECKEDWP AS-2 Clayton, Gina From: Delk, Michael Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:34 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Acqua and The Downtown Plaza FYI -----Original Message----- From: Akin, Pam Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:32 AM To: Danny Tyler (E-mail); Bob Reid (E-mail) Cc: Campos, Geraldine; Brumback, Garry; Arasteh, Mahshid; Simmons, Margie; Delk, Michael; Bruch, Tracey; Horne, William Subject: Acqua and The Downtown Plaza C Acqua Deal Points - #3.doc .The AmSouth revised term sheet. This does not reflect my recollection of the meeting on all points. I suggest we forward our comments to Geri ASAP. Some of the issues may be easily clarified. Of particular concern to me is the description of the parking- para.4, and para.9 concerning TIF. Acqua and The Downtown Plaza Proposed Business Terms for Development Agreement between Clearwater Development, LLC ("Developer") and City of Clearwater ("City") 1. Developer has successfully responded to the City RFP for redevelopment of a 3.99 acres site known as the SuperBlock (consisting of AmSouth and adjacent sites). The redevelopment project consists of- * 245 dwelling units a 87,800 sf existing office a 35,000 sf of retail a 55,000 sf theatre a 1080 Parking Spaces (540 public spaces- office/retail/theatre parking and 540 private spaces- condominium parking) 2. The City administration shall provide a statement of support for approval of Developer's application to the Community Development Board for a density bonus of 36 dwelling units from the bonus pool and an authorized height of 367 feet, in order to allow full development of the plan identified in Paragraph 1. 3. The Developer is providing parking in excess of what is required for the condominium development to satisfy the City's desire for additional parking to service the public. 4. City agrees to reimburse Developer for the cost of 360 parking spaces designated for use by the general public as retail/theater spaces, at $25,000 per space, for the total amount of ($ 9,000,000) nine million dollars (US). These spaces will be located onsite. 5. The Developer shall own and operate a parking garage to be located onsite, which garage shall include the spaces referenced in item # 4 above. 6. Developer must maintain parking during construction for the operation of the existing office building, and anticipates that approximately 150 spaces will be displaced. City shall make a good faith effort to identify for Developer convenient locations at which temporary parking spaces may be made available, and shall assist Developer in obtaining agreements with property owners for such temporary parking. 7. Developer must have adequate space for parking of construction personnel during the build period for the project. The City's Engineering Department shall work with Developer to provide staging areas for construction, including the possibility of allowing contractor's trailers to stage on Laura Street during construction. 8. Developer agrees to provide City with an updated study for the Tax Increment Financing ("TIF") objectives for the project. The City has indicated that the term of the study should be for a proposed period of 12 years, and the methodology should assume a break-even position at that point. The study will address the following development components: • Sales projections and valuation for the condominium tower. • Sales projections and valuation for the retail and theater. • Projected timing and valuation of the public parking revenues to the City. • Projected regional benefits (increased property values and tax revenues) to the City due to the impact of this development. 9. TIF revenues shall be pledged to support a bond issue to cover the following improvements: • Costs associated with the parking garage, as referenced above. • Redevelopment of roads, (specifically Laura Street and roadway improvements surrounding the site), streetscaping (including Osceola and Cleveland), water, sewer, stormwater, gas, electric and other utilities. . • Impact fees for the theater/retail component of the project ( and, if sufficient revenues are available, for impact fees associated with the condominium component ), assessments, permit fees, and utility connection fees in connection with the project. 10. City shall modify the CRA plan, if necessary, to provide funding for the commitments outlined herein. 11. Developer agrees to construct all development components identified on the enclosed Development and Parking Summary. Developer will consider constructing the new development components in two phases of construction, in order to allow the theater, retail and parking to open prior to completion of construction of all of the condominium units. In addition, the recladding of the office building shall be commenced at the time 85% of the condominium units have been closed. 12. City agrees to cooperate with Developer on any and all relocation costs and/or easement and right-of-way issues requiring resolution for the development of the site. Developer agrees to identify all projected costs for utility relocations in order to address such costs as part of the TIF study. 13. City shall expedite the approval and permitting of this project to allow an early reservation period for the project. 14. City will obtain, through acquisition or eminent domain, the outparcel, owned by , consisting of approximately 2,600 SF as shown on the attached map. This parcel shall be included in the project defined in #1 herein. 15. City shall absorb any identified concurrency needs for the development. 16. City shall, to the extent necessary, provide zoning incentives such as those listed in Section 376.84, Florida Statutes (2005) which includes incentives such as reducing review requirements for the change in use and occupancy, the establishment of code criteria for specific uses and the institution of credits for previous uses within the project area. 17. In light of the fact that this project is within the CRA, is within a designated Brownfields area and an Enterprise Zone, City shall make a good faith effort to provide any and all other incentives as provided for by the state statutes and local policy or regulations governing those programs. Attachments: Exhibit A - Development and Parking Summary Exhibit B - Parking Letter (Delivered to City December 9, 2004) #1714660x3 O?J?yB d-a?eYO?d b C `?. un sgace wta/-hd(tt-. ?Q S Lt? ? ? ?oLu?+4 - rJn pa?lum? !4's ??k Ise ct" Nv+?S?d.?. -W A V-,-, ----- - ---2?-IQv_?,_ *vc?2? 4 WO ? ? ----per - --a- . ? --- ? l?G?!? Tay- -?. do-vus?0 OSCEOLA AVENUE 6'?% 0 6' ]a' FIRST LEVEL PLAN A1.7 PUBLIC pUJ..,v.cdt % -3' 00'57 FORT HARRISON AVENUE o a' u' SECOND LEVEL PLAN PUBLIC a I' i ?I ai a a b 0 n rn i 0 0 0 I ? o> - N M O O N O m 0 __62'-0" 19'-0" 24'-0" 19'-0" 0 ° t6' 32' THIRD LEVEL PLAN ® at.7 ?h e• , r PUBLIC ? I , ? ? 62'-4" 19'-0" 24'-4" 19'-0" ? ? o ie• 32' FOURTH LEVEL PLAN ® A1J CONDO/PUBLIC o te' 72' FIFTH LEVEL PLAN t/t® A1.7 CONDO o te' 32' SIXTH LEVEL PLAN ® Pi.7 tPV . tCONDO CAR COUNT TOP LEVEL - - --- - - EL. 56' STALL SIZE = 9'-0" x 19'-0" LEVELS PUBLIC CONDO STD. HC STD. HC SIXTH 174 3 FIFTH 210 3 FOURTH 112 3 80 - THIRD 185 3 SECOND 171 3 GROUND 78 6 TOTAL 546 15 464 6 561 470 0 PA) (0 WO- u ? Quo, moo.. , re1 fr (MAO) lJ G?kO06 ode MI/A. 5TH LEVEL EL. 46' 4TH LEVEL EL. 36' 3RD LEVEL EL. 26' 2ND LEVEL EL 16' 4? GROUND LEVEL EL. 0' 40 ?w ISOMETRIC NORTH PUBLIC PARKING CONDO PARKING Page 1 of 2 Clayton, Gina From: Delk, Michael Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 5:05 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Meeting on CW Acqua Gina -- You're oversight is definitely needed here. mid -----Original Message----- - -From: Clayton, Gina- -- Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 4:32 PM To: Delk, Michael Subject: RE: Meeting on CW Acqua If this is just to talk about the submission - I can help. Based on his e-mail it looks like we are to discuss the submission more than the actual site plan. Do you want me to have any oversight on this major redevelopment project e.g. review staff report; discuss with staff preparing the staff report how it does/does not comply with the Downtown Plan. There will be a direct relationship between the site plan and the CRA development agreement. One of us will need to make sure the site plan/CRA agreement are consistent. There will be no development agreement application processed by the Planning Dept. -----Original Message----- From: Delk, Michael Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 2:43 PM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: FW: Meeting on CW Acqua Gina - FYI. Include Neil if you think it's time to get DR in the process. I want to make sure they get started on the right track by know early what we'll need to get them smoothly into the development approval process. mid -----Original Message----- From: Mark Rieker [mailto:mrieker@riekerassociates.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:50 PM To: Delk, Michael Cc: Bruch, Tracey; info@clearwaterdevllc.com Subject: Meeting on CW Acqua Michael, Thanks for your message. I am confirming our meeting tomorrow morning at 9:30 am (didn't want anything to conflict with your 8:30 appointment). The purpose of the meeting is to review the Development Application process and the requirements for supporting documentation needed. You had mentioned in our last meeting that you might be able to give us pointers to expedite the process and prevent us from submitting unnecessary items. 8/12/2005 Page 2 of 2 Thanks for your assistance. See you then. Mark p.s. Tracy, by copy of this email, I am confirming our appointment for 10:00 am. I will only need about half an hour with Michael. Mark Rieker President Rieker & Associates, Inc. 1020 N. Orlando Ave., Suite 150 Maitland, FL 32751 321.206.4123 (direct) 321.206.3399 (main) 407.628.2105 (fax) 321.287.5677 (cell)- mrieker@riekerassociates.com 8/12/2005 Lit m tkzLu ouma& -,at a?+s Laos. e'1 sow - ?u Miv? 3soral - tzra?- ODO-L- M (A. \?Ocb 3100 ?dedeca? ? z,PzuQ '%i- ubl (c ? P, Q )ut9 - $ Jbl tC, ?acn.5 1?eed A? clorifti U*o mays jhat (" J, q- -#us ?-re 0rc¢- I?-?wo L V U)l A i -ram- A r. IA v? mot- rya ?? - ITT ?IC, Sys'! f_ac'4' S? Uc? Ui 0 !Ncu? e4iskM? u?es? c? b-da?evr?u.,e. ult?4 `f?r?_ Cw?. ups?in_ rnN fal.Q W?t?n,?v view ---- (CL_ iLOUG DA ?9rra?e_ a ? ctaWa _ o" 0::b ON, o?vad-(-nX S?Slv.+ti __ Wink` ftt Acha:d 9 7D tin;?.er V\ cktvdo?A" - Lo to b 6_fn6s r U.004 4 220 _ -V -- - CLI A 4k, V) to A ?Arl s c Y) Cxt L ?-td?n 349 _?.ces?_? _ a mo les s ue, cam. ava?s 40 0 U\O\ VC, 4 W - %- - `pct csc_?ac.25 W 0 ACQUA at the Downtown Center, Clearwater Parking Summary As of 03/07/05 Development Calculation Total Basis Basis Parking Qty. Units Rate Per Spaces Code Minimum Calculations: Condominium Units 245 Units 1.25 1 306 Retail 35,000 SF 4.00 1,000 140 3-? - Theater 55,000 SF 4.00 1,000 220 Office 87,800 SF 3.00 1,000 263 Total Code Minimum Parking Count: 930 Developer Calculations: Condominium Units Condo Visitor/Excess Retail Theater Office Actual Spaces Provided Condominium Units Condo Visitor/Excess Retail; Theater Office Additional Public Spaces' 541 BR's 1.00 1 541 100 35,000 SF 4.00 1,000 140 2,000 Seats 1.00 4 500 87,800 SF 3.00 1,000 263 Developer Required Parking Count: 1,544 Location Parking Levels 3 - 5 below condo tower 541 Y included in levels 3 - 5 above 122 - Robotic Parking Structure below theater 140 Basement Level (also uses office spaces) 250- Parking Levels 1 - 2 below condo tower 250 ' Basement Level and Robotic Structure 330 •. * Note: Combined theater/retail/public spaces = Sts uq.0, ftp&, t&-6l to C-Q. U;K (MAVPr4 - V- 0 Entitlements and Parking 03.07.05.xis 3/7/2005 Actual Parking Count: 1,633 720 590 LC/ Parking Calculations Clayton, Gina From: Sent: To: Subject Arasteh, Mahshid Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:45 PM Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael; Campos, Geraldine RE: Amsouth Development .? Michael, Gina, Do you have this information? Mahshid D. Arasteh, P.E. Public Works Administrator 727-562-4757 -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:27 AM To: Arasteh, Mahshid Subject: RE: Amsouth Development Mahshid, The information that is required to finalize estimates includes: 0-1y"OLCA ta-5 .1 .WAU ? ? r"S uy?\W$6 Vn- 1. A site plan with a site data table that indicates existing and proposed uses with square footages. 2. The sizes of required water meters to determine water and sewer impact fees. 3. On stormwater, Brian Barker is preparing an estimate for a new outfall. A vault or vaults would be required on- site to provide some storage. We need to determine what the developer is planning for location and space available for these vaults. On the parking, the latest info that we have is that the development will have 720 spaces (345 robotic and 375 in the basement of the proposed parking garage) to serve the theater, retail and public uses. Code required parking is as follows: Theater 55,000 sq. ft. 5 spaces/ 1000 275 spaces required Retail 31,834 sq. ft. 4 spaces/1000 127 spaces required -1 I L., Total 402 spaces required This leaves an excess of 318 spaces over the code required that would be considered public spaces. _?T& However, the theater operator has indicated that they need 500 spaces. Substituting the 500 figure for the 275 code require theater spaces leaves an excess of 93 parking spaces that could be considered public spaces. I have invited Brian Barker, Bennett Elbo and Lisa Murrin to the meeting on Friday per your Email. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Arasteh, Mahshid Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:38 PM To: Rice, Scott; Barker, Brian A. Cc: Quillen, Michael Subject: RE: Amsouth Development Scott, if any of the staff members that are working on these estimates don't have the info they need please let me know as soon as possible so that I can ask Pam Akin get the info from the developer. Thanks Mahshid D. Arasteh, P.E. Public Works Administrator 727-562-4757 -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:29 PM To: Barker, Brian A. Cc: Arasteh, Mahshid; Quillen, Michael Subject: Amsouth Development Brian, Mahshid has been requested to prepare cost estimates for City work that may be required to accommodate the subject development generally between Cleveland & Drew and Osceola & N. Fort Harrison. To provide stormwater treatment a vault or vaults would be required. We do not have a site plan, but Mike asked if an estimate for a new outfall could be prepared. The next meeting with the developer is scheduled for May 10th. Could you have someone prepare an estimate for this work by May 6th for use in the that meeting? Thanks, D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Clearwater Development, LLC c/o Kevin J. Burke 206 S. Brand Blvd Glendale, CA 91204 May 26, 2005 Dear Mr. Burke: City management has reviewed the proposed business terms for a Development Agreement between Clearwater Development LLC (Developer) and the City of Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA). While we have specific responses to your proposal submitted on May I Ot" that will be outlined below, we wanted to provide you with a general perspective with regard to the incentives requested in your proposal. As previously discussed, the staff is prepared to recommend that CRA use tax increment that will be generated from your development project to support a variety of incentives. These incentives can include public parking, streetscaping, payment of impact fees, etc. However, rent or lease guarantees were never anticipated by the CRA to be.pait of this package. As we have previously mentioned, the County portion of the increment is limited as to its use; rent support would not be an acceptable use. Based on the limited information provided, we have estimated that the tax increment generated by your development project, if bonded for a period of 30 years, could generate approximately 15 million dollars to support the public parking and other requested incentives. This would require approval of the County to extend its increment commitment and of course approval by the CRA. This number can be further refined once you submit to the CRA an updated study for the tax increment to be generated as you discussed in item #9 in your proposal. The CRA does not have any other major source of funds other than the increment generated from your project to apply to this proj ect. Staff will recommend that the CRA request an extension of time from Pinellas County in order to be able to bond the tax increment for this project over a 30-year term. The CRA and City will make its best effort to receive approval from the County. However, we cannot guarantee the County's participation. 1 Overall, the City's and CRA's goal is to provide additional public parking in the Downtown area. While this is an important goal to us, neither the City nor the CRA is interested in owning, operating/managing, or maintaining an underground or robotic parking garage. If this location is cost prohibitive, the CRA will assist in finding alternative locations to add public parking spaces. At our last meeting, we suggested several ways that a separate entity could own the garage including a Community Development District (CDD). The items below will respond directly to several numbered items in your proposal: 2) In clarification, the Development Agreement will be between the Developer and the CRA. The City's site plan review process is separate from this process. The use of density bonuses though the Public Amenities Incentive Pool is negotiated though the site plan process and administered by the Planning Department and approved by the Community Development Board (CDB). 4) The CRA desires to have parking spaces available to the public that is in excess of the code-required parking. 6) The fee for payment in lieu of providing stormwater quantity attenuation is calculated based upon the site acreage, not the elevation of the parking. The City will not hold the Developer harmless for any excess stormwater costs. The City agrees to assist the Developer in identifying alternative solutions for stormwater management. 7 and 8) The number of public parking spaces available in the Downtown is limited. We do not have 150 parking spaces available for temporary office parking or for construction personnel. There may be opportunities for agreements with private property owners in the Downtown that may have spaces available. The process for determining road closures and construction staging is through the City's Engineering Department. 9) This study will be very useful if it identifies separately the City and County benefits. 12) The CRA Plan should not have to be modified to outline CRA funding commitments on a particular project. This will be detailed in the Development Agreement. 13) The CRA's Fagade Improvement Grant Program is a $5,000 matching grant program. The intent of the program does not cover this type of request. 15) It was not the CRA's intent to provide long-term commitment in terms of a rent/lease guarantee to support the theater. 16) As part of the Development Agreement, the CRA will expedite the approval and permitting process as much as possible. 2 17) If the property is an essential part of the project the Developer needs to make a good faith effort to acquire this property. If the Developer is unsuccessful, the CRA may evaluate the necessity of acquiring this property. Any costs of acquisition would reduce the funds available for other incentives for this project. 19) We need clarification on this request. 20) The project is within a Brownfields and Enterprise Zone. The Economic Development & Housing department will work with the Developer to make sure they apply for all available state and federal incentives related to being in these zones. We hope this initial response will help you in preparation for our next discussion scheduled for Tuesday, June 7`" at 3:30 pm at the second floor of City Hall. Please feel free to give me a call at (727) 562-4023 if you have any questions or need clarification. Sincerely, Geraldine Campos Interim Executive Director City of Clearwater Community Redevelopment Agency cc: Bill Horne, City Manager Garry Brumback, Assistant City Manager Pam Akin, City Attorney Elias Jaffif, Clearwater Development LLC 3 ' Clayton, Gina From: Arasteh, Mahshid Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:45 PM To: Rice, Scott; Clayton, Gina; Delk, Michael; Campos, Geraldine Subject: RE: Amsouth Development Michael, Gina, Do you have this information? Mahshid D. Arasteh, P.E. Public Works Administrator 727-562-4757 -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:27 AM To: Arasteh, Mahshid Subject: RE: Amsouth Development Mahshid, The information that is required to finalize estimates includes: 1. A site plan with a site data table that indicates existing and proposed uses with square footages. 2. The sizes of required water meters to determine water and sewer impact fees. 3. On stormwater, Brian Barker is preparing an estimate for a new outfall. A vault or vaults would be required on- site to provide some storage. We need to determine what the developer is planning for location and space available for these vaults. On the parking, the latest info that we have is that the development will have 720 spaces (345 robotic and 375 in the basement of the proposed parking garage) to serve the theater, retail and public uses. Code required parking is as follows: Theater 55,000 sq. ft. 5 spaces/1000 275 spaces required Retail 31,834 sq. ft. 4 spaces/1000 127 spaces required Total 402 spaces required This leaves an excess of 318 spaces over the code required that would be considered public spaces. However, the theater operator has indicated that they need 500 spaces. Substituting the 500 figure for the 275 code require theater spaces leaves an excess of 93 parking spaces that could be considered public spaces. I have invited Brian Barker, Bennett Elbo and Lisa Murrin to the meeting on Friday per your Email. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Arasteh, Mahshid Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 5:38 PM To: Rice, Scott; Barker, Brian A. Cc: Quillen, Michael Subject: RE: Amsouth Development T ` Scott, if any of the staff members that are working on these estimates don't have the info they need please let me know as soon as possible so that I can ask Pam Akin get the info from the developer. Thanks Mahshid D. Arasteh, P.E. Public Works Administrator 727-562-4757 -----Original Message----- From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:29 PM To: Barker, Brian A. Cc: Arasteh, Mahshid; Quillen, Michael Subject: Amsouth Development Brian, Mahshid has been requested to prepare cost estimates for City work that may be required to accommodate the subject development generally between Cleveland & Drew and Osceola & N. Fort Harrison. To provide stormwater treatment a vault or vaults would be required. We do not have a site plan, but Mike asked if an estimate for a new outfall could be prepared. The next meeting with the developer is scheduled for May 10th. Could you have someone prepare an estimate for this work by May 6th for use in the that meeting? Thanks, D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 ' scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Elias Jafif Clearwater Development LLC 400 Cleveland Clearwater, Florida 33755 Dear Mr. Jafif, INTRODUCTION Pursuant to our engagement by Clearwater Development, On Target Research conducted live intercept surveys of residents of Clearwater, Florida to obtain specific feedback from them the about the development your firm is considering building in downtown. This survey was conducted on 400 Clearwater residents at various locations in and around Clearwater during the third week of December 2004. All of those surveyed were both residents of Clearwater and registered voters. The zip codes of the respondents are included in the attached tabulation report. After confirming that the respondent was a resident of Clearwater and a registered voter, we showed the individual renderings of your proposed development and then asked them as series of questions. Primarily, you wanted to know how the residents of Clearwater would view your proposed development and, specifically, if they would be concerned with or object to the height of your project. In short, there is very wide acceptance of the planned development as well as its height. These survey results have a 95% confidence level and a 4.89% margin of error. We provide a brief summary of the results below. RESULTS After showing each respondent renderings of your development, we asked, "How would you feel about this development in downtown Clearwater, which would include residential, retail and a 12-screen cinema complex all with sufficient parking?" There was, frankly, a torrent of positive response to this question. Three hundred and twenty-four (324) people, or 81% of those surveyed, liked the idea. Answers ranged from "Good idea,". to "Yes, absolutely do it," to "Downtown needs the development." How would you feel about this development in downtown Clearwater, which would include residential, retail and a 12-screen cinema complex, all with sufficient parking? y o 81% 400/6- "Fig ' y 15% -1101 Good Idea / Not Into It / Don't Care / Yes Absolutely Too Much Don't Know Building We decided to take the height issue head on and followed the above with, "Do you have any problem with the height?" Again, the response was overwhelmingly positive. Three hundred and nine (309) people or 77.25% answered "No" or said they had no problem with the height. Do you have a problem with the height? We attached a detailed breakdown of these answers as well as the zip code breakdown of the respondents. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, Meri Valerius Vice President Chief Administrative Officer I CLEARWATER PROJECT Survey Tabulation 00. Are you a Clearwater resident? (400 responded) YES (400) 100% 0. Are you a registered voter? (400 responded) YES (400) 100% 1. How would you feel about this development in downtown Clearwater, which would include residential, retail and a 12 - screen cinema complex all with sufficient parkin? (400 responded) LIKE IT GOOD IDEA / FINE / YES, ABSOLUTELY DO IT / DOWNTOWN NEEDS THE DEVELOPEMENT / LESS TRAVEL TIME (324) 81% DON'T LIKE IT NOT INTO IT, DON'T LIKE BUILDINGS WITH A LOT OF STORIES / TOO MUCH BUILDING (60) 15% NEITHER LIKE OR DISLIKE DON'T CARE/ DON'T KNOW (16) 4% 2. Do you have any problems with the height? (400 responded) NO (309) 77.25% YES (91) 22.75% ?r AA i? 3. May 1 ask your zipcode? (400 responded) 33764 (54) 13.5% 33755 (51) 12.75% 33756 (50) 12.5% 33765 (37) 9.25% 33767 (28) 7% 33759 (24) 6% 34698 (17) 4.25% 34695 (17) 4.25% 33761 (13) 3.25% 34683 (13) 3.250/. 33763 (11) 2.75% 33760 (9) 2.25% 34695 (8) 2.25% 33659 (8) 2% 33771 (5) 1.25% 33757 (5) 1.25% 33765 (4) 1% 33770 (4) 1% 33776 (3) .75% 34685 (3) .75% 34684 (3) .75% 33786 (3) .75% 33677 (3) .75% 33762 (3) .75% 34686 (2) .5% 33773 (2) .5% 33716 (2) .5% D A all 33702 (2) .5% 33777 (2) .5% 35401 (2) .5% MISCELLANEOUS (12) 3% 33606 - 33616 - 33635 - 33715 - 33733 - 33753 - 33763 - 33769 - 33778 - 34056 - 34655- 35537 GENDER (400 responded) MALE (222) 55.5% FEMALE (178) 44.5% "Those that objected to height by zip code at Q#13" Q.13. Do you have any problem with the height? (400 responded) YES (91) ZIP CODE BREAKDOWN (91 responded) /o 19 Mal WIM /o 711) _;. 3313b-? 1 /0 33761(5) 5% 33763(5) 5% 34698(4) 4% 33771(3) 3% 33760(3) 3% 33759(3) 3% 34685(2) 2% 33767(2) 2% 33702(2) 2% MISCELLANEOS (5) 5% 35401 - 34695- 33769- 33715- 35537 3 r.'` -fit Nti s _ } y3 ) Z? ? gi9p Aq ut t ? °? Y i ?G? Y. . - M TT i?` t ACQUA at the Downtown Center, Clearwater Graphic Study of Development CONFIDENTIAL As of 03/07,U5 1. Overall Design Summary Parcel North or_Laura Street Parcel S. of Laura Ob1 i SF Comments QIY SF Commeids Condo knits 245 409,898 1,673 avg Retail and Restaurant 17,927 Lobbies & Conmwn 85,577 Theaters 55,000 SeMcefMgmuEquipmt/BOH 8,500 guess Service/MrWEggpmt/BOH 5,000 Ch"ouse/Mtg Rms/Servery 3,000 guess 6 Restaurant 8 Retail 13,907 0 HeahhchA 6,000 0 Subtotal Conditioned Area 526,983 Subtotal Conditioned Area 77,927 Balconies 76,146 Basement Parking-Sublevel 1 400 152,000 Ancdary Panlxing (level 1) 124 49,800 Robotic Parking 345 34,500 Office Parking (level 3) 221 88,400 Service Area 12,000 Condo Parking (levels2, 4, 5) 571 219,835 Amenities Deck (level B) 63,098 Subtotal Unconditioned Area 497,079 Subtotal Unconditioned Area 198,500 Gross area (construction) 1,024,062 Gross area (construction) 276,427 Floor- Northwest View southwe st view talloor Bldg Named Resit Height Elev Floor Fly Roof Deckr-> 367 Perthouse 32 26 14.00 353 Presidential 31 25 12.50 340 Presidential 30 24 12.50 328 Presidential 29 23 12.50 315 Executive 28 22 12.50 303 27 21 11.33 292 26 20 11.33 280 25 19 11.33 269 24 18 11.33 258 23 17 11.33 246 22 16 11.33 235 21 15 11.33 224 20 14 11.33 212 19 13 11.33 201 18 12 11.33 190 17 11 11.33 178 16 10 11.33 167 15 9 11.33 158 14 8 11.33 144 12 7 11.33 133 11 6 11.33 122 10 5 11.33 110 9 4 11.33 99 8 3 11.33 89 7 2 11.33 76 Amerces Deck 6 1 - 11.33 65 5 P5 - - Condo 221 Cali 17.00 48 4 P4 Cpldd 221ears -: 10.00 38 WROM P3 - '.321 ears. .. _. 10.00 28 2 PZ Office Parld ig 26 earn 10.00 IS ftsbooc.1 1 llPl Office P-rkM - t24 Cars Retai Lobbv Retail 18.00 0 34i%pWA PW Wiliea[eMiteta?:. ., -- 375 ears ., .. Pubkht Floor- to-door Bldg Hakjht Ekrv 1 Fast Office l 1 87,809 sf I , 1 ! 1 1 Root Deck-> Bo 40.00 20 f 20.00 0 11. Land Area Required to Achieve Design Pr ogram above Code Land Area Reg'd Code Lmd Area Reg'd 9Y SF Acres OY f 9E Acres Condo lids 245 70 ufac 152,460 3.50 Condo Units 0 70 u/ac 0 0.00 Restaurant/Retail 13,907 4 FAR 3,477 0.08 - o 31 834 Restaurant/Retail 17,927 4 FAR 4,482 0.10 Theater 0 4 FAR 0 0.00 Theater 5510(t0 4 FAR 13,750 0.32 Office 87,800 4 FAR 21,950 0.50 0.so 4 0 92 3.58 acres eeded F= . 111. Land Available SF Acres SF Agm Office'Release Parcer (N. of Laura) 94,090 2.16 Office parcel S of Lana 32,234 0.74 Wide Buffalo Parcel 10,890 0.25 Baptist Church Parcel 36,040 036 2.41 1.58 IV. Entitlement Credits Needed from Density Bonus Pool 0.66 AvaBablie acreage muae needed (1.17) ?excess shat 82 Ifin the fOrnl of Residential Units, need 36 reels ltDm i" (46) 203,829 or...- Hinthe form of.6doratr?a, rise dl MV TiOmpogl (114.769) Key rotes on these results: 1 The Qty has Indicated that Mere shah be no real d6lendy in obtabtng this aurnber of additional rnsidentlal urds from the pool. 2 The water table below 10' is known to be a problem, and will make negodatiors on incentives nnore t. 6lfiait due to the No cost for that parking. Entitlements and Parking 03.07.05ids 3!72005 Graphic entitlements 6 parking x Acqua and the Downtown Plaza Proposal Submitted by Clearwater Development LLC Proposal (AmSouth Site) City Responses (Summary response in Italics) 1) Summary of Project Reid: We are curious as to whether there has been any deviation from the original RFP response and proposal submitted originally. Response to RFP did not include specifics. 2) While Planning has generally discussed with Developer, I don't believe that the public amenity to be provided has been detailed. Reid: This request is certainly subject to the City's normal policies and procedures, with a caution regarding any contract zoning issues. 3) City needs to define actual number ofpublic spaces. 4) City needs to define "true " number of public spaces (over requirements). Also cost per space is too high. Reid: The City's reimbursement obligation should be contingent on the developer's performance of specified performance standards and goals. We will likely need a better determination of which spaces are to be dedicated to "public parking" and which will not. Margie: This parking is much too expensive. The City (Council) will need to determine if it is worth the cost to have in that location. I am not sure since the parking will largely be used by the new development (since a lot is "shared" parking) if we will be able to remove the parking from below the bluff or will we still need to add more parking somewhere else (at additional cost - and yes - I have no more money). We also do not want robotic parking - certainly not owned or operated by us - too costly, and probably not at all for public parking - even if owned and operated by them. Michael: Conservatively, It would appear that in fact only approximately 330 of the parking spaces are "public" spaces. That would sharply reduce the amount of dollars requested but may leave negotiation room for something in-between. For example, of the balance of spaces up to 720 we could possibly negotiate on some ration (4 to 1) as long as the spaces were not otherwise restricted to general public use. Mahshid: The City desires to have parking spaces available to the public that are in excess of the code-required parking. The Developer shall identify the number of true public spaces in excess of the code-required parking. The cost per space is high. The maximum cost data available is $15,000 per space. 5) City does not want to own or maintain below ground or robotic parking garage Reid: I believe the City has determined that it has no interest in owning or operating the parking facility that will be part of this development. There appears to remain a possibility that the City will ultimately become liable for the parking regardless of ownership if it obtains a "public" status. Margie: The robotic parking is too expensive to operate and is subject to other problems as well. I like the CDD option and the cost of operating the parking can to placed on the CDD. Michael: I do not think City wants to own parking garage. However, I think we should possibly consider activating the Parking District to make/maintain some of this (if not other) facilities. 6) The City has no obligation to hold the Developer harmless for any excess stormwater costs. Reid: Proposed City obligation to "cooperate with Developer in identifying alternative solutions" is likely too vague and will need to be described in more detail. Indemnity appears to raise constitutional issues as lacking a public purpose, with excess funding obligation too open ended. Margie: we should not get into solving the stormwater problems; issue is theirs to solve and we certainly should not be holding them harmless nor paying any excess costs. Joel: Assisting the developer could be limited to approval and direction. This can be an easier concession. I would not agree to a hold harmless clause unless the there was certainty from the City engineers and even this opens up further liability issues. Mahshid: The fee for payment in lieu of providing stormwater quantity attenuation is calculated based upon the site acreage, not the elevation of the parking. The City has no obligation to hold the Developer harmless for any excess stormwater costs. 7) No parking spaces available in the Downtown area; would impact our revenue in the Parking System. Reid: Are these spaces even available to the City to offer the Developer? What about rate and ordinance covenants? 8) No parking spaces available in the Downtown area 9) The study will be helpful if done quickly and identifies benefits to City and County. Reid: The Developer's study should also address any claimed "collateral benefits" to the City and County for the surrounding area, and also address any impact on the County 2 i Margie: we should push them to get study done soon and then make sure we review it. 10) City will meet with County to discuss bond request and time extension after Developer's proposal is finalized; we cannot guarantee an extension. Reid: Although the City can seek BCC approval, they have no ability to force the County's agreement. The use of the word "shall" is misplaced. 11) TIF may not be sufficient to cover all requested costs. Reminder that County's portion of the TIF cannot be used to pay for incentives such as development impact fees. Reid: The City will need to make sure the proposed plans and developments are covered by the current CRA plan as approved by the County and the City. Adjustments made be necessary. Some of the items may cause violations with various Ordinance or rate restrictions on the City's utilities. Mahshid: The City has calculated costs for the relocation of public utilities in the Laura Street right-of-way. The calculations do not include any utilities that are not City owned (electric, etc.) 12) The CRA Plan should not have to be modified to outline CRA funding commitments on a particular project. Reid: The City will need to make sure the proposed plans and developments are covered by the current CRA plan as approved by the County and the City. Adjustments may be necessary. Some of the items may cause violations with various Ordinance or rate restrictions on the City's utilities. 13) The CRA's Fagade Improvement Grant is a $S, 000 matching grant program. The intent of the program does not cover this type of request. Reid: The City will need to negotiate specific performance standards and timetables. They want us to pay part of this cost through the facade improvement. I don't think we have that kind of money available in that program. 14) City/CRA needs to decide if they will pay for relocation of public utilities. Reid: Not sure what the meaning of "cooperate" is within this context. Will need to verify whether there is any impact on bond covenants, rate ordinances, etc. Mahshid: The City has calculated costs for the relocation of public utilities in the Laura Street right-of-way. The calculations do not include any utilities that are not City owned (electric, etc.) 15) It was not the CRA's intent to provide long-term commitment to support the theater. 3 It Reid: This request is for the City to underwrite the costs of the theatre. Has the City Council agreed to such support? Is this a deviation from the FRP request and responses? I don't think we want a long-term commitment to support the theater. Michael: We cannot commit "any available funds" to the theater. Does the developer have specific needs which can be identified? What incentives area needed? It does not seem feasible to guarantee any leases. 16) As part of the Development Agreement, the CRA will expedite the process as much as possible. Reid: This request raises potential contract zoning issues. 17) The City has historically not used eminent domain in this type of scenario. 18) This needs further discussion. Reid: This request seems too broad and open-ended on the part of the City. May involve collateral constitutional issues. Michael: We can evaluate and plan for dealing with concurrency matters over time. However, there is a distinction between long-term concurrency items, and exactions necessary to offset the impact of development. The developer will be responsible for mitigating direct impacts unless those are identified and negotiated pursuant to final development review. We may have options in this regard for capital improvements or CRA expenditures if reasonable. Mahshid: Lift Station #16 may need to be upgraded to accommodate sanitary flow from the development. The City's consultant is currently evaluating the required upgrades to the station for increased downtown development. There may be a cost to the development associated with the required upgrade. 19) City needs to clarify process to Developer. Reid: This request raises potential contract zoning issues Michael: Within code parameters we can evaluate how to ensure timely review and approval. Credit for previous uses may be able to be negotiated where not permitted outright such as with regard to site coverage, existing traffic trips generated, etc. 20) The project is within a Brownfields and Enterprise Zone. The ED & H department will work with Developer make sure they apply for all available state and federal incentives related to being in these zones. Reid: This request appears way too vague, too broad and too open ended. 4 R2vi eu? d. cmvvtrVuwzt-. Acqua and The Downtown Plaza Proposed Business Terms for Development Agreement between Clearwater Development, LLC ("Developer") and City of Clearwater ("City") 1. Developer has successfully responded to the City RFP for redevelopment of a 3.99 acres site known as the SuperBlock (consisting of AmSouth and adjacent sites). The redevelopment project consists of. • 245 dwelling units • 87,800 sf existing office • 31,834 sf of retail • 55,000 sf theatre • 1,633 Parking Spaces (public and private parking) 2. City, through the site planning process, shall provide a density bonus of 36 dwelling units from the bonus pool and an authorized height of 367 feet, to allow full development of the plan identified in Paragrap . 3. The Developer is providing parking in excess of what is required for the condominium development to satisfy the City's desire for additional parking to service the public. 4. City agrees to reimburse Developer for the cost of 720_RqLkng spaces designated for exclusive use by the general public, and retail/theater patrons spaces, A $30 OOOXer space, for the total amount of ( hn nnm twenty one million, six hundred thousand dollars (US). These spaces will be located on the basement level of the site, and in a robotic garage located below the theaters on the south end of the site, north of the office building. 5. Parking ownership options: • City may elect to own and operate the parking garage indicated in item #4 above. If City elects this option, City assumes responsibility for all operations, liabilities, revenues and costs. City will also be required to maintain the garage in a manner reasonably acceptable to Developer and its successors and/or assigns. • City may elect to lease the parking garage. If City elects this option, Developer and City will share the cost of an economic and operational analysis to identify the projected operational requirements, revenues, taxes, maintenance costs, capital costs, and other such items to determine the financial terms of the lease. • City shall elect a ownership/lease option within six (6) months of the date of a signed Development Agreement. 6. City acknowledges that the public parking garage is located below grade over the entire site area, and that water table studies have shown that the floor of the garage will be located at or near the groundwater level. This condition creates limitations on potential storm water management solutions directly on site. City agrees to cooperate with Developer in identifying alternative solutions for the storm water management procedures, and further agrees to J hold Developer harmless from any conflicting design or construction obligations, and any excess costs beyond the customary costs Developer would have incurred if the public garage did not exist within the development at all. 7. Developer must maintain parking during construction for the operation of the existing office building. Due to the logistics associated with constructing the below-grade public garage„ approximately 150 spaces will be displaced. Therefore, City shall make a?cailable to Dyer, at no cost to Devel_op?r, 150 temporary arking spaces located as close as possible to the office buy McT1_ng. 8. Developer must have adequate space for parking of construction personnel during the build period for the project, and due to the extent of required excavation for the public parking garage component on the basement level of the property, that space cannot be accommodated on site. City agrees to allow construction crews to park in the City's 4 storin ara at no cost to developer, and to allow contractor's trailers to stage on Laura Street during construction. 9. Developer agrees to provide City with an updated study for the Tax Increment Financing ("TIF") objectives for the project. The City has indicated that the term of the study should be for a proposed period of 20 years, and the methodology should assume a break-even position at that point. The study will address the following development components: • Sales projections and valuation for the condominium tower. • Sales projections and valuation for the retail and theater. • Projected timing and valuation of the public parking revenues to the City. • Projected regional benefits (increased property values and tax revenues) to the City due to the impact of this development. 10. City shall obtain an extension of time for the existing TIF to provide for a full 20 year term. 11. TIF revenues shall be pledged to support a bond issue to cover the following improvements: • Costs associated with the parking garage, as referenced above. • Redevelopment of roads, (specifically Laura Street and roadway improvements surrounding the site), streetscaping (including Osceola and Cleveland), water, sewer, stormwater, gas, electric and other utilities. • Impact fees, assessments, permit fees, and utility connection fees in connection with the project. 12. City shall modify the CRA plan if necessary to provide funding for the commitments outlined herein. 13. Developer agrees to construct all development components identified on the enclosed Development and Parking Summary. Developer intends to construct all new development components in a single phase of construction, except for the recladding of the office building. The recladding of the office building shall be commenced at the time 85% of the units have been closed. Developer funding for the recladding shall be matched through the Main Street Program for Downtown Building Exterior Rehabilitation. 14. City agrees to cooperate with Developer on any and all relocation costs and/or easement and right-of-way issues requiring resolution for the development of the site. Developer agrees to identify all projected costs for utility relocations in order to address such costs as part of the TIF study. 15. Developer has agreed to incorporate the movie theater component into its development in response to the City's RFP for this service, and to enhance the downtown environment as an entertainment destination. In return for this, and to the maximum extent possible, Developer requests that any available City funds, whether in the form of TT-binds-&--separately buBgeted incentives, be grante to eve op er in their entirety to support the Theatre and insure its ong term viability. C' agrees to act upon this request open y_ and diligently -tu-p i e the greatest possible benefit toward the success of the theater. Doing so ensures that neither the City nor the Developer will realize a negative result due to the lack of economic viability for the theater. These incentives shall include, but not be limited to, City guarantees for the theater lease(s). 16. City shall expedite the approval and permitting of this project to allow an early reservation period for the project. 17. City will obtain, through acquisition or eminent domain, the outparcel, owned by , consisting of approximately 2,600 SF as shown on the attached map. This parcel shall be included in the project defined in #1 herein. 18. City shall absorb any identified concurrency needs for the development 19. City shall, to the extent necessary, provide zonine incentives such as reducin eview requirements for the change in use and occupancy, the establishment of code criteria for specific uses and the institution of credits for previous uses within the project area. 20. In light of the fact that this project is within the CRA, is within a designated Brownfields area and an Enterprise Zone, City shall make a good faith effort to provide any and all other incentives as provided for by the state statutes and local policy or regulations governing those programs. Attachments: Exhibit A - Development and Parking Summary Exhibit B - Parking Letter (Delivered to City December 9, 2004) A Acqua and the Downtown Plaza Development and Parking Summary Per drawings by FBBA dated 2/21/05 Development Basis Qtv. Units Calculation Basis Rate Per Exhibit A Code Minimum Calculations: Condominium Units Retail Theater Office Total Parking Spaces 247 Units 1.25 1 309 35,000 SF 4.00 1,000 140 55,000 SF 4.00 1,000 220 87,800 SF 3.00 1,000 263 Total Code Minimum Parking Count: 932 Developer Desires (if above code minimum): Condominium Units Condo Visitor/Excess Retail Theater Office 548 BR's 1.00 1 548 100 35,000 SF 4.00 1,000 140 2,000 Seats 1.00 4 500 87,800 SF 3.00 1,000 263 Developer Required Parking Count: 1,551 Actual Spaces Provided Condominium Units Condo Visitor/Excess Retail* 7 / Theater* Office \\ Additional Public Spaces Location Parking Levels 3 - 5 below condo tower included in levels 3 - 5 above Robotic Parking Structure below theater Basement Level (also uses office spaces) Parking Levels 1 - 2 below condo tower Basement Level and Robotic Structure 548 115 140 250 250 330 Developer Required Parking Count: 1,633 * Note: Combined theater/retail/public spaces = 720 j1 L 7 December 2004 William Horne City Manager Gary Brumback Assistant City Manager Pamela Akin City Attorney 112 S. Osceola Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Parking incentives Dear We have been working over the various scenarios for the site that would enable us to provide you with a reasonable estimate of the parking availability and the incentives necessary to accomplish the development of the movie theater and infill retail on the Cleveland St / Laura St. site. Based on our meeting in October, it was my understanding that the following issues were understood: a. The City would be willing to provide up to approximately $15,000,000 in parking incentives to develop retail/theater parking. b. The City would want to retain ownership or control of that portion of the parking structure so funded and developed. As you know, we have been attempting to finalize an acceptable preliminary design of the development. To date the constant flow of revisions have made it difficult to pin down where and how much parking will be available for the theaters/retail should we proceed with the development. Moreover, depending on the total parking needs of the development and due to the limited amount of space, our pricing models for parking have changed dramatically with each redesign. Notwithstanding the above issues, we feel that we can work with the City of Clearwater on the following points: Number of Parking spaces: 350 - 600 Cost per space: $25,000; on or above grade structured parking $35,000; below grade structured parking Ownership: City of Clearwater Management: City of Clearwater The city would keep parking revenues and be responsible for all costs related to the maintenance, insurance, staffing, etc. The city must agree to provide 3 hours free parking to all customers of the movie theater and 1 hour free parking to all other retail. We will provide the site for the parking structure and build the parking structure on a reasonable timetable that will coincide with the rest of the development. Depending upon the final approved design, the parking structure (either above grade or below grade) may require the city to either vacate or allow the construction upon a portion of Laura Street, which would be granted at no cost to the developer. This also assumes that we will be fully entitled to develop the condominiums, retail, theaters and parking for the condominiums and Amsouth office building according to our design, upon submission. Sincerely, Kevin Burke ?1? =sf _?/c?rs TcikQN e?A' ib ml f0'? ? ?p?y?_? Uvilfs ?a.P`taxcks(?0 O(s pvl?- Geuru?wc_Pn,? (_?MSu?? YP? ?0.1s?.bl Ya _sl?ur?2?- -5\as5 ?I -tee ?_?Perm??e_?a?--= _io'_d?p ?c?' --- ?V-1-r?c,?,?_?_ Z ice- - ,? i?rn?av_?tnemaa- {o-?# 12 scece? ??_q _a?,?[e,. (c?e? mow" LoM fit W'! 5??YG4n9 ?w? she.-. -- i! On &CeddLl - 2- .1 A I - hPd7 Y 41 ? ?nc -rn act v u, r(,.- ill. - 121C a t 9 onl?- DJ Z2?0 VMA n?.x3 i ?1lcYC Sc??(D2?'l_ e? Pk? - ???NCPCeS-ID??C?Q? _u v -07,m- 10 F2;LdL. -tom ?- l- - t0p Au- -0 4?k-_ 1SSJ_2 - it 4 ?titvuxzc? }?1??P?P c -(tPi_d?aw?n ave?raU-@K_o2f ? -- - - -V?p W_I?Vili?Ic? - a?uc on_CObt ?-?zv - City/Developer Design Review Meeting Minutes Thursday - Dec. 23, 2004 Clearwater Development Attendees: Cyndi Terapani - City of Clearwater Gerri Campos - City of Clearwater Mark Perry - City of Clearwater Tim Baker - Farmer Baker Barrios Architects Mark Rieker - Clearwater Development, LLC (I) Project Status Presentation • Previous Team Meetings ? Workshop #1 - July 29, 2004 (Visioning, Style, Context, Teaming) ? Workshop #2 - Sept 20, 2004 (Master plan and massing presented) ? Workshop #3 - Oct. 26, 2004 (Tower architecture presented/discussed) ? Conf Call -Nov. 1, 2004 (Design discussed in detail in prep for 11/23) ? Workshop #4 - Nov. 23, 2004 (Meeting foreshortened) • Purpose of Today's Meeting ? Return to productive dialogue pertaining to the business of the project ? Developer needs to understand if the overall condo tower design and timing parameters are attainable before continuing to invest money in the proj ect. ? Developer wants to understand the City's concerns more thoroughly. ? Establish follow up meetings in order to chart course for project. • Brief Presentation of Evolution of Tower Design ? Developer provided synopsis of design evolution ? Discussion on perceptions of compliance of design with codes (II) Design Comments from City (on Condo Tower) • Height may still be a concern at 31 stories • Building still seems monolithic, and needs more work to break down mass and scale visually • Color variations may need to be considered • Back of building is not as visually interesting and needs additional step backs • Additional discussion will be needed in the future to address design on street level facades. • Tim Baker did some rough sketches during the session that began to respond to the comments provided by the City. *'City/Developer Design Review Clearwater Development (III) Other business: Thursday - Dec. 23, 2004 Page 2 of 2 • City expressed that they may retain an architect to provide design comments from their end. • City desires: ? 750 public parking spaces (if possible) ? Theater and Retail venues ? Destination development • Developer will need timing assistance in order to reintroduce below grade parking at the levels previously discussed. Cost is also an issue. • Next meeting set for Friday, January 14, 2005. Clayton. Gina From: Tarapani, Cyndi Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 9:08 AM To: Clayton, Gina Subject: RE: Amsouth this reflects my notes so go ahead and send it to them. I will forward your final e-mail to Garry. Thanks. Cyndi Tarapani Planning Director (727)562-4547 cyndi.tarapaiu'@myclearwater.com -----Original Message----- From: Clayton, Gina Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 3:57 PM To: Tarapani, Cyndi Subject: Amsouth I'm not sure we agreed to an agenda at the meeting, but these are the things we discussed that need to be done e.g. additional information and/or revised design. Please let me know if you think I've missed anything. - City agreed to look at options for making Laura Street a one-way street, therefore Amsouth will explore. They will also work on handicap access within the robotic garage. (This may not be resolved by next meeting). - Need to determine what Amsouth will do for density pool (it appears they will need 36 units from the pool). We discussed the possibility of public art on the Ft. Harrison facade of the tower as an option and streetscaping. - City requested information regarding the number of theater patrons that would queue in the arcade space. - Amsouth will incorporate photographs of adjacent buildings along Cleveland Street and Ft. Harrison to ensure the design is contextual (in particular the fenestration patterns). - Amsouth also agreed to look at the theater entry way. We discussed flipping the marquee to be more in line with the streetscape feature proposed in this vicinity, as well as have the marquee over the entrance instead of the exit. We also talked about the difficulty of reading the arcade on the drawings and that should be made clearer. Amsouth also agreed to better define the top of the buildings along Cleveland St. We also talked about adding design/display features along garage facade along Ft. Harrison and to enhance the side facades facing Ft. Harrison. Based on the above, I believe the agenda should focus on the following: Garage entry along Laura St. Information from Theater regarding patron queuing Revised design along Cleveland Street and Ft. Harrison Density Pool discussion. 9 6 Clayton, Gina From: Mark Rieker [mrieker@riekerassociates.com] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 11:57 AM To: Clayton, Gina; tbaker@fbbarch.com; rledord@fbbarch.com; Tarapani, Cyndi; Delk, Michael; Parry, Mark; Rice, Scott; Quillen, Michael; Campos, Geraldine; Brumback, Garry; Arasteh, Mahshid Subject: [BULK] RE: Next AmSouth Meeting Importance: Low Thanks Gina, Your list looks like the full extent of what we need to review. We had also talked about potentially getting into parking and traffic engineering in detail, but we won't be quite there on the 16th. We will have to hold that for a future meeting. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com [mailto:Gina.Clayton@myClearwater.com] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 9:33 AM To: mrieker@riekerassociates.com; tbaker@fbbarch.com; rledord@fbbarch.com; Cyndi.Tarapani@myClearwater.com; michael.delk@MyClearwater.com; Mark.Parry@myClearwater.com; Scott.Rice@myClearwater.com; Michael.Quillen@myClearwater.com; Geraldine.Campos@myClearwater.com; Garry.Brumback@myclearwater.com; Mahshid.Arasteh@myClearwater.com Subject: Next AmSouth Meeting Good morning, I would like to confirm that our next meeting will take place on March 16th at 2:00. We will be prepared to discuss the following: Ft. Harrison Ave. and Cleveland St. facades (including back of tower facing Ft. Harrison); N Laura St. access; Density calculations; and Use of Amenity Pool. . If I've left anything off the list, please let me know. Thanks. Gina L. Clayton Long Range Planning Manager City of Clearwater gina.clayton@myclearwater.com 727-562-4587 1 Ru 4n C. roP?ddt ? ???r a hc?- kc - - a &9. - 3,T aoo t t 40 m a?7?os 3oys,?, -5R- ssono m ?ka? zzo ?., ???ice.- ZU3_v= . -ID- ?j -eb A, pP,?.e,LP?nn' dQS?(gd Co _ -?mvlo . qoedz?a sin ?a? 21c3 -??,w v ? { ' ' -I un N 0 C ? I_?pa?? zso ku?_ r?dcu ov?4.4, s?"fiows?&C3-Oat ¢ 3f-? O.?da - ?4 "b'TS 6fnwa? $? C b ? I - _hw ve@u? a!e c_ b C uv?{o 0 0 - *obt71-io a„ 01' J.-1. 2 _ uzXS FF. Naer,sax - ruvnp ?P°F_dvwn ?w_e(f??u/ Osceola - P?p?n?e fs,? ccdos __ --- ?ra Sk. - ¢c?lcy {7?9-_YOf?nc?_?a?tV?nc, 0 -=1o.sexve?_?4ev-a_c5,_teAaS2_ fRean(r?ru? re.Pw.SI plrn?fJxa A, III • I f 'mow-? p ? roimi?? pay MOVPS Out -p,(otv__ ojmr btA 52Cn?-? CYVJ;lk_ goo ? Y? !?v?a, ? - a ccz 5?_ 2a lip _ lb -E:- -6a (_Qo2?cid_tnc?ule_ "suwA-*", I I I nl . & (-LuKn , `7 4rh '- CA r44eTw`^ ) `lJOsc..Q,??nt. J. ??l9?ct? OScda SSdo ?> OOV J i r Us _ rot--fo u,? _ - 1A1Mt- v?uad .?`1 uv??fs ?Yd,ev?, DAIR fin nyL 2" oa1POumhm 4;?? Sulrwm7_, I'SIAU- 6w V UAA ?, 4 -L,? JAAI 'rQ GtL?.- C?? 6u 4 ? 110d 1OF NQ,O.,? -? ?l.ar Oa.-?irl1a(RS ? Deer 0 r? ?&Aje 7rm 6cLc J & mod... . UT. ?IGun v bl+ coo a A i U, 0 a oa /0-0 00 _ ? o a ?(, a too 0 0 ?z - i C1u -fit- rn _n?eaAd? - Y?b??e`Yhc!d¢c II r P?utaod?.???,a9 ?9,,? ?pocR. alive,- -- ui Ito zso _ rex ?Q u+u CSOO CODS V/?¢?t k*P? ? ll+?'- a? Res._-Isv? y? S _- o?+a?gl_w!?e_ sLte - 4-14 o?ia_ . e 9?6r??? _a!k ?9 _FXNM u how_db-wea_t(uw vevd??-- - _?zm-isoo 'll Pay 5 ? ?sco - -- UY\% 1l it ?I 4 a ?s ? ! ?'In 0 e ? ? . mss. ? ,ll 1 ? 1L n •.... ?? ? ? nom. , n o ?,. /? -re(?tc?aaa? -?Urr?? Y_M?1- (4bCarr_ -- ?Wu?_5 d,YiJ?,n _dw/- _ dv isaD-tgg? auS u,rs ??? At I'?ewz T?KJ (la?Ew.? ?bc¢5-?w_1?1a?ra??{, -U? ??Jnry?o.,t_, PctrlL, 0 ------------ ?I • 1 3 ?n2bt+ nq?y 6Jf ntaL` ?wd/?S cavern i'ISa2Qb0.c?S dp?'Lf WI?(4.ut` pN(v"? 1I °b ?i?c6 -- - I?1mui?r? s6jl?s Vocc? - - ?Lxte ?n?rbau - AACL ??- N C??'ilPa 6-Stor?sl?s-?moi+,p[z"?- ?n ?aUs ?? mgt - ?_?e. ?1tzd -fp- ? e wove s ? l?eSarb ? _ cam` -M, 9 1 -,* - t L y? ?dR s _apac?s ? la?? dw f0 h? ZOp beaus -?_ _Aitrr?.so±.l{c ?4Gm? --- -??i Imcb{=?Pn °'?-)sef? ? ? lo =la?lol¢.?ic 'N4??CUt?.07 ' -- am -,OVA cvyt?ya L D -(M- iG- 4-6 -O?n h . c S J k? i R Ut tj 4E- Wpcot -rY-1, --tyuwt? I S4ocf - Tla-yUa, fcwbvvi t rAl LAVA k-- - l? svql P 4-7 r? - a-40 coy ?c _ 6 _ bec?u? I qI& 14 - ?k & 1I ItAMwA 1 .A .•AA r i ?lA T • IT _spzce_ -_ belay 9''??_g,?p _{wr b§?re_ .. - --C-e?E_ _ca?eb'ud,m and _ la-dux! --- 444- oaf UtCe- ;I.NL440!?(.LW?=Q!in P.Vrpkf i?Lbm!1. ?uxc? b_ - hPS!?F ?k hS Ual6l-naL?us._ _ - ?ro? ?Q? to ? Ntcve ?^L at, AW)3?V,vn?i-? -- :?rsm ? qgD µ?l? fhmd issy?i(?s? -TIF- c SI'fC0 v? Uced fo ?rYVnu YN7XtL ,au1t udU_N?f 46.?ev,,ed ?{-??-(na t??? its (bmd ?vr adC s.- DD6_l v?cK {o_ DD's? R,? ?cuft? ¢?o?r?(w ma.fiv ?itp zq CoO ? -gem t? ?"Wm9 c?rnoae,_ l2le 5-ase_ _ -{rn+?? Snm?' et v ? k-- ?L- d-- a f? t ?l u? 0: ?TA 111`ua& d? ?Cler ? o_SNnw+l- 2axl ?a?k-ywrw??? - i • SELECTED APPLICABLE PROVISIONS FROM: THE CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES July 29, 2004 1 • Applicable Overall Objectives and Policies from the Downtown Plan Objective 1F: Cleveland Street shall be maintained as Downtown's Main Street which is valued both for its historic character and scale of development and for its function as the major retail street. Objective 2A: The Downtown street grid should be maintained to provide multiple access points in and through Downtown, to assist in dispersing traffic on various routes and contribute to improved traffic operations. Vacation of streets shall be evaluated based on redevelopment potential provided alternative access exists or can be provided. Objective 21: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. Policy 1: The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. Policy 4: Renovation, rehabilitation and reuse of historic resources are encouraged. Flexibility through the site plan review process should be utilized so that historic resources may be retained and reused. Policy 12: Drive-through facilities shall only be permitted as an accessory use and through a design that minimizes the views of the facility from rights-of-way and preserves the urban character of Downtown. Policy 17: Property owners/developers are encouraged to meet with area neighborhood associations/business groups prior to submitting a major redevelopment project for City review. Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. 2 • • Policy 20: Shared parking for commercial, office and mixed uses should be accomplished wherever possible. Policy 23: The City shall evaluate the need, size and location for a parking garage(s) to support entertainment, retail and/or restaurant uses. The City may support the development of these uses through the construction of a garage, participation in a public/private partnership to build a garage or contributions to assist in the construction of a garage. Selected Applicable Downtown Core Objectives and Policies Policy 3: Priority shall be given to the construction of a garage(s) in support of the implementation of the Coachman Park Master Plan. The garage(s) shall be located to provide convenient access for Park, Library and Marina users. Policy 7: To ensure a pedestri an-friendly and safe environment, driveways shall be discouraged on Cleveland Street between Myrtle Avenue and Osceola Avenue. Policy 8: Redevelopment and new construction along Cleveland Street shall be compatible with and contribute to pedestrian vitality, human scale and historic fabric. Selected Applicable Provisions from the New Construction Chapter of Design Guidelines Block and Lot Characteristics: Appropriate: • Retention of the existing street grid pattern where it contributes to an active pedestrian environment. • Blocks which promote easy pedestrian access and encourage cross-use. • Redevelopments that reopen previously vacated rights-of-way or create new rights-of- way. • Provision of new vehicular and pedestrian access/circulation that effectively serves the proposed development and vicinity if a vacation of a right-of-way is requested. • Lots which maintain a consistent size, scale, pattern and rhythm of the surrounding block(s). Inappropriate: • Vacating existing rights-of-way to form consolidated blocks without providing alternative pedestrian and vehicular access to serve the proposed development and vicinity. 3 • • Large blocks which prohibit pedestrian access through the block and/or prohibit access within and around the development. Access, Circulation and Parking: Vehicles and people need to co-exist however, it should be recognized that the Downtown is first and foremost for pedestrians. Circulation throughout the Downtown should be designed to provide safe and direct connections that minimize vehicular- pedestrian conflicts. Parking lots and garages should be as unobtrusive as possible while maintaining easy accessibility. Pedestrian circulation patterns transitioning from parking areas should be designed to be safe, convenient and attractive. 1. Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking Appropriate: • The location, number and design of driveways which maintain the urban fabric of the downtown. • Vehicular access from secondary street frontage or alley. • Attached garages in residential developments, architecturally integrated with the design of the principal structure. • Driveways functionally integrated into the design of the development. • Joint/common access driveways between sites. • Shared parking where a mix of uses creates staggered peak periods of parking demand. • Parking lots located behind the primary facade of the principal building. • Parking lot design that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. • Parking lots adjacent to rights-of-way that are screened with either a landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. • Large parking lots visually and functionally segmented into smaller lots with landscaped islands and canopy. • Parking garages as the principal uses that are architecturally integrated with surrounding developments and/or the envisioned character of the area. • Parking garages as the principal use within the Downtown Core located on Cleveland Street, Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues with at least 75 percent of the ground floor of each facade on all adjacent street frontages occupied by active uses. Active uses include restaurant, retail, entertainment or other uses/features determined to be pedestrian-oriented. • Parking garages accessory to a principal use that are architecturally integrated with the design, materials, finish and color of the principal structure(s) on the lot. • Ground floors of parking garages accessory to a principal use with at least 75 percent of the primary facade occupied by the principal use/features or other use determined to be complementary to the principal use. • Upper floors of all parking garages designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. Screening includes landscaping, walls, architectural elements or other decorative features. 4 • • Parking garages with clearly marked points of ingress and egress. Inappropriate: • Curb cuts at every site. • Parking lots or garages as the most prominent feature of any development. • Parking garages difficult to enter and/or with poorly defined entrances. 2. Pedestrian Circulation/Access Appropriate: • Clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. • Pedestrian scaled lighting such as lighted bollards; • Vertical elements such as bollards, markers, arches or architectural details. • Alleys and courtyards that match or complement either the building or the primary street to which the alley connects with regard to materials, architecture, color and street furniture (waste receptacles, benches, lighting, etc.). • Specialized paving design especially where pedestrian and vehicular paths intersect. • Pedestrian passageways which go through buildings such as an arcade. Inappropriate: • Developments which do not include direct access from surrounding streets and parking areas. • Large developments which do not provide pedestrian walkways through the block on which the development is located. • Pedestrian passageways too narrow to be useable or not designed at a human scale. • Pedestrian passageways that create an unsafe environment. Site Elements: Open Space Open spaces provide public "living rooms" in the urban setting. The design and location of these spaces are important determinants in creating successful pedestrian environments. In general, the type and character of the urban open space should be influenced by the desired function of the space, surrounding uses and the potential users of the space. In addition, amenities provided within open spaces can enhance the connectivity of the various design elements making up these spaces. Amenities include benches, chairs, tables, planters and landscaping. Public art enlivens open spaces and buildings adding to the cultural vibrancy of a city. Inappropriate: Open space that does not relate with the uses and buildings surrounding it. 0 • BUILDING PLACEMENT Location: The appropriate location of a building should help define and provide a coherent streetscape and appearance of an area resulting in a defined sense of space and place. The appropriate location of a building on a site varies depending on the Character District in which the development is located. A setback or a build-to line will determine the appropriate location of a building. A setback requires a minimum distance from a property line which may be exceeded whereas a build-to line prescribes a particular distance from a front property line. OriPntntinn Buildings should be oriented towards the street. The orientation of the front facade of buildings along the streetscape contributes to pedestrian interest in an area. Buildings that turn perpendicular to the public right-of-way or have their sole access from rear parking lots create an environment that is unfriendly for pedestrians. Separation: The existing and/or desired character of the area should define the distance between buildings. Separation between buildings should be determined based on the character district's vision and development pattern, intensity of development, pedestrian activity and height of the building and its surroundings. When separation between buildings is unavoidable or desirable, the separation should be designed to function in a manner that complements the surrounding area. Coverage: High percentage of ground coverage is encouraged in a downtown to create a critical mass of activity. The amount ofground coverage varies among character districts with the most intense coverage found in the Downtown Core and the commercial areas of the other districts. In addition to a building, coverage can also include plazas, courtyards, outdoor cafes and other public spaces. Appropriate: • Buildings that maintain the build-to-line or the setback of the development's block and the block(s) across the street. Corner lots that maintain the location pattern for a distance of two blocks including both sides of the street. • Buildings located farther from the build-to line that provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian-oriented design features which maintains the build-to line. • Buildings with reduced setbacks that reflect the predominant surrounding or desired development pattern. • Buildings oriented to face public rights-of-way. • Separation between buildings that provide adequate useable space such as an alley or open space compliant with the requirements of these Guidelines. • Developments which provide coverage similar to surrounding properties and/or that meet the desired vision of the character district. 6 • • Inappropriate: • Buildings that break up the common build-to line by locating farther back or forward than the predominant block patterns on the subject's site and the opposite side of the street. • Corner lots that do not maintain the location pattern for a distance of two blocks including both sides of the street. • Buildings separated at a distance which precludes the provision of Guideline- compliant alleys and open space. • Separations between buildings that are out of scale and proportion with the district's existing or desired development pattern. • Buildings which do not address the primary street. Height: New development and redevelopment should respect the vertical height of existing or approved adjacent buildings and contribute to a pedestrian scale. The apparent height of a building/development can be influenced and augmented by a combination of stepbacks, varying building heights and horizontal features such as colonnades, canopies, awnings, cornice lines, string courses, wide windows, etc. Appropriate • Building form which visually relates to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth. • Buildings that have a distinct "base," "middle" and "cap." • Low-rise buildings and/or those with long facade widths that accentuate vertical elements such as entrances and columns, or by breaking up the facade plane into a greater number of smaller vertical masses. • Mid- and high-rise buildings that utilize horizontal elements that minimize the apparent height of a building such as balconies, banding, cornice and parapet lines, etc. • High-rise buildings that use one or more of the following depending on overall building height and the existing or desired character of the surrounding area: ? The width of the upper portions of buildings reduced to minimize the overall building mass (reducing the size of the floor plate). ? Building stories or/stepbacks differentiated by architectural features including but not limited to coping, balustrades, cornice lines, change in materials, etc. ? Stepbacks used as the building increases in height. • Buildings that terminate views emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. • Maintaining a consistent building depth when feasible to allow the location of shared parking lots and/or secondary entrances. • Buildings which correspond to the existing and/or desired rhythm and spacing of surrounding buildings through the use of common points of agreement such as windows, doors, recesses, reliefs and other architectural elements. 7 • 0 • Buildings which maintain the existing and/or desired pattern of the placement and size of windows, doors, shutters, and other architectural elements on adjacent buildings with regard to both the ground floor and upper stories. • Finished floor heights a minimum of two feet above the sidewalk grade for residential buildings within predominantly mixed use or commercial areas. Additional Requirements for Downtown Core along Cleveland Street and Fort Harrison Avenue. Development along Cleveland Street between Myrtle and Osceola Avenues and along Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew and Chestnut Streets. Appropriate: • Development incorporating an architectural style/building type indicative of those found in Downtown Clearwater between 1900 and 1950 and includes: ? 201h Century Commercial Vernacular: One-story or One-Part; ? 201h Century Commercial Vernacular: Two-story or Two-Part; ? Art Deco; ? Art Modeme; ? Chicago School; ? Mediterranean or Mission Influence; ? Mediterranean Revival; ? Neo-Classical; • Buildings which utilize character defining features from any one of the approved architectural styles/building types listed above through the use of contemporary materials. Inappropriate: • Use of multiple and/or conflicting architectural styles within a single building or between several buildings within a single project. Materials and Color: Appropriate: • Materials compatible with the existing and/or desired context of the surrounding area and that are common to the area's historic construction methods/style. • Buildings that are built as high-quality, long-term components to the urban fabric constructed as maintenance free as possible. • Building materials consistent with and relating to the architectural style of the building. • Building materials appropriate to the scale of the building. • The use of contemporary materials adapted to historic design elements. • Storefront level and upper levels that use visually compatible materials. 8 • Use of the following durable materials within the first three floors of all buildings and recommended for all other floors: ? Wood, stucco and/or or masonry exteriors. ? Masonry exteriors finished in rusticated block.. ? Stucco, brick, stone, etc. applied over concrete block.. ? Horizontal brick or block patterns. ? Storefront side piers, when provided, constructed of the same material as the upper facade or covered with stucco. ? Pre-cast, cast-in-place or architectural concrete . ? Tile and Any other material found acceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. Inappropriate: • Exterior walls and skins of buildings designed and/or constructed of materials with a limited life expectancy. • Walls constructed of, corrugated or reflective metal panels, and/or textured plywood. • Walls and/or roofs finished with cedar shakes. • Materials incompatible with the architectural style of the building. • Unfinished, exposed concrete block. • The use of the following materials on building exteriors: ? Poorly crafted or "rustic" woodworking and finishing techniques; ? Cedar shakes; ? Plywood (T1-11 siding, etc.); ? Corrugated, mill finish or reflective metal wall panels; ? Expanded metal (except for limited decorative applications); ? Mill finish aluminum extrusions for windows and doorways; ? Unfinished Concrete Masonry Units (CMU or cinder block); and ? Any other material found unacceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. The use of the following materials on the first three floors of building exteriors: ? Foam except for architectural details and ornamentation ; ? Exterior insulated finish system (EIFS) except for architectural details and ornamentation ; ? Hardboard siding; ? Plastic, metal and or vinyl siding except for single-family dwellings ; ? Fiberglass panels; ? Exposed aggregate (rough finish) ; ? Concrete wall panels; ? Indoor-outdoor carpeting or astro-turf; and ? Any other material found unacceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. 9 • Colors 0 Appropriate: • The number and type of building colors appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. • Low reflectance exterior colors. • Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes, meters, etc. painted as part of the overall color scheme. Inappropriate: • Colors that are garish, gaudy, loud, excessive and ostentatious or that constitute a glaring and unattractive contrast to surrounding buildings. • Main body color that is from the deepest tones of the color wheel. • More than three different colors or color shades used on a single building unless appropriate to the architectural style of the building. • The use of fluorescent or day glow colors. • Black as the predominant exterior building color. • Single color schemes. For example using one color on every surface. • Clashing trim colors that are not complementary to the main body color and serve only to attract attention through their dissonance. As an example, yellow and red are clashing colors and not complementary and only serve to attract attention through their dissonance. • A solid line or band of color or group of stripes used in lieu of architectural detail. • Color used to obscure important architectural features. 10 ? ORARf? I • City of Clearwater Planning and Eligibility Study Historic Resource Reconnaissance Survey of the Downtown Core Mav 2004 S s? Figure 23: 416-418 Cleveland Street, Facing Northwest. 8PI02256 416-418 Cleveland Street Built circa 1911, this two-story masonry commercial building features a two-bay fagade on the south side. In 1913, the Clearwater post office was located in this building. The two storefronts have been modernized. Alterations have been made to the fagade at the second- story level to make this building appear to be one with the adjacent Bay View Building, 410- 414 Cleveland Street. Additionally, a metal leaf band was added between the first and second floors of this building and the adjacent building in the 1960s by Tarpon Springs architect Ed Hoffinan, Sr. A historic vertical hanging sign, which advertised Schaffer's Cafe in the 1930s, is still found above the west storefront. The historic physical integrity of this resource has been compromised. However, the alterations to the exterior of this building, particularly the application of the metal banding and the scored stucco veneer, appear to be reversible. With the proper rehabilitation, this resource could be considered a contributing resource to a historic district within the Downtown Core. Janus Research 52 • 0 i SELECTED APPLICABLE PROVISIONS FROM: THE CLEARWATER DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDELINES July 29, 2004 1 • Applicable Overall Objectives and Policies from the Downtown Plan Objective 1F: Cleveland Street shall be maintained as Downtown's Main Street which is valued both for its historic character and scale of development and for its function as the major retail street. Objective 2A: The Downtown street grid should be maintained to provide multiple access points in and through Downtown, to assist in dispersing traffic on various routes and contribute to improved traffic operations. Vacation of streets shall be evaluated based on redevelopment potential provided alternative access exists or can be provided. Objective 21: Redevelopment and public improvements shall create and contribute to pedestrian linkages throughout the Downtown. Objective 3D: Redevelopment is encouraged to create a vibrant Downtown environment containing a variety of building forms and styles that respect Downtown's character and heritage. Policy 1: The design guidelines establish the quality and design features expected for renovation, redevelopment and new construction in Downtown with which all projects must be consistent. Policy 2: The character of each district shall be reinforced through the site plan and design review process. Projects shall be consistent with and contribute positively to the vision of the character district in which it is located. Policy 3: The design of all projects in Downtown shall make meaningful contributions to the pedestrian environment through site and building design. Policy 4: Renovation, rehabilitation and reuse of historic resources are encouraged. Flexibility through the site plan review process should be utilized so that historic resources may be retained and reused. Policy 12: Drive-through facilities shall only be permitted as an accessory use and through a design that minimizes the views of the facility from rights-of-way and preserves the urban character of Downtown. Policy 17: Property owners/developers are encouraged to meet with area neighborhood associations/business groups prior to submitting a major redevelopment project for City review. Policy 19: Residential development shall provide appropriate on-site recreation facilities based on the scale of the project. • Y Policy 20: Shared parking for commercial, office and mixed uses should be accomplished wherever possible. Policy 23: The City shall evaluate the need, size and location for a parking garage(s) to support entertainment, retail and/or restaurant uses. The City may support the development of these uses through the construction of a garage, participation in a public/private partnership to build a garage or contributions to assist in the construction of a garage. Selected Applicable Downtown Core Objectives and Policies Policy 3: Priority shall be given to the construction of a garage(s) in support of the implementation of the Coachman Park Master Plan. The garage(s) shall be located to provide convenient access for Park, Library and Marina users. Policy 7: To ensure a pedestrian-friendly and safe environment, driveways shall be discouraged on Cleveland Street between Myrtle Avenue and Osceola Avenue. Policy 8: Redevelopment and new construction along Cleveland Street shall be compatible with and contribute to pedestrian vitality, human scale and historic fabric. Selected Applicable Provisions from the New Construction Chapter of Design Guidelines Block and Lot Characteristics: Appropriate: • Retention of the existing street grid pattern where it contributes to an active pedestrian environment. • Blocks which promote easy pedestrian access and encourage cross-use. • Redevelopments that reopen previously vacated rights-of-way or create new rights-of- way. • Provision of new vehicular and pedestrian access/circulation that effectively serves the proposed development and vicinity if a vacation of a right-of-way is requested. • Lots which maintain a consistent size, scale, pattern and rhythm of the surrounding block(s). Inappropriate: • Vacating existing rights-of-way to form consolidated blocks without providing alternative pedestrian and vehicular access to serve the proposed development and vicinity. 3 0 • W • Large blocks which prohibit pedestrian access through the block and/or prohibit access within and around the development. Access, Circulation and Parking: Vehicles and people need to co-exist however, it should be recognized that the Downtown is first and foremost for pedestrians. Circulation throughout the Downtown should be designed to provide safe and direct connections that minimize vehicular- pedestrian conflicts. Parking lots and garages should be as unobtrusive as possible while maintaining easy accessibility. Pedestrian circulation patterns transitioning from parking areas should be designed to be safe, convenient and attractive. 1. Vehicular Circulation/Access and Parking Appropriate: • The location, number and design of driveways which maintain the urban fabric of the downtown. • Vehicular access from secondary street frontage or alley. • Attached garages in residential developments, architecturally integrated with, the design of the principal structure. • Driveways functionally integrated into the design of the development. • Joint/common access driveways between sites. • Shared parking where a mix of uses creates staggered peak periods of parking demand. • Parking lots located behind the primary facade of the principal building. • Parking lot design that minimizes negative impacts such as light glare, exhaust fumes, noise and undesirable views. • Parking lots adjacent to rights-of-way that are screened with either a landscaped buffer or a solid wall or fence three feet in height. • Large parking lots visually and functionally segmented into smaller lots with landscaped islands and canopy. • Parking garages as the principal uses that are architecturally integrated with surrounding developments and/or the envisioned character of the area. • Parking garages as the principal use within the Downtown Core located on Cleveland Street, Fort Harrison and Osceola Avenues with at least 75 percent of the ground floor of each facade on all adjacent street frontages occupied by active uses. Active uses include restaurant, retail, entertainment or other uses/features determined to be pedestrian-oriented. • Parking garages accessory to a principal use that are architecturally integrated with the design, materials, finish and color of the principal structure(s) on the lot. • Ground floors of parking garages accessory to a principal use with at least 75 percent of the primary facade occupied by the principal use/features or other use determined to be complementary to the principal use. • Upper floors of all parking garages designed to visually screen vehicles from view from rights-of-way and public open spaces. Screening includes landscaping, walls, architectural elements or other decorative features. 4 11 • • Parking garages with clearly marked points of ingress and egress. Inappropriate: • Curb cuts at every site. • Parking lots or garages as the most prominent feature of any development. • Parking garages difficult to enter and/or with poorly defined entrances. 2. Pedestrian Circulation/Access Appropriate: • Clearly defined, safe, direct, convenient and landscaped pedestrian pathways provided between streets, parking areas and buildings. • Pedestrian scaled lighting such as lighted bollards; • Vertical elements such as bollards, markers, arches or architectural details. • Alleys and courtyards that match or complement either the building or the primary street to which the alley connects with regard to materials, architecture, color and street furniture (waste receptacles, benches, lighting, etc.). • Specialized paving design especially where pedestrian and vehicular paths intersect. • Pedestrian passageways which go through buildings such as an arcade. Inappropriate: • Developments which do not include direct access from surrounding streets and parking areas. • Large developments which do not provide pedestrian walkways through the block on which the development is located. • Pedestrian passageways too narrow to be useable or not designed at a human scale. • Pedestrian passageways that create an unsafe environment. Site Elements: Open Space Open spaces provide public "living rooms" in the urban setting. The design and location of these spaces are important determinants in creating successful pedestrian environments. In general, the type and character of the urban open space should be influenced by the desired function of the space, surrounding uses and the potential users of the space. In addition, amenities provided within open spaces can enhance the connectivity of the various design elements making up these spaces. Amenities include benches, chairs, tables, planters and landscaping. Public art enlivens open spaces and buildings adding to the cultural vibrancy of a city. Inappropriate: Open space that does not relate with the uses and buildings surrounding it. 5 V 0 BUILDING PLACEMENT U Location: The appropriate location of a building should help define and provide a coherent streetscape and appearance of an area resulting in a defined sense of space and place. The appropriate location of a building on a site varies depending on the Character District in which the development is located. A setback or a build-to line will determine the appropriate location of a building. A setback requires a minimum distance from a property line which may be exceeded whereas a build-to line prescribes a particular distance from a front property line. Orientation: Buildings should be oriented towards the street. The orientation of the front faivade of buildings along the streetscape contributes to pedestrian interest in an area. Buildings that turn perpendicular to the public right-of-way or have their sole access from rear parking lots create an environment that is unfriendly for pedestrians. Separation: The existing and/or desired character of the area should define the distance between buildings. Separation between buildings should be determined based on the character district's vision and development pattern, intensity of development, pedestrian activity and height of the building and its surroundings. When separation between buildings is unavoidable or desirable, the separation should be designed to function in a manner that complements the surrounding area. Coverage: High percentage of ground coverage is encouraged in a downtown to create a critical mass of activity. The amount of ground coverage varies among character districts with the most intense coverage found in the Downtown Core and the commercial areas of the other districts. In addition to a building, coverage can also include plazas, courtyards, outdoor cafes and other public spaces. Appropriate: • Buildings that maintain the build-to-line or the setback of the development's block and the block(s) across the street. Corner lots that maintain the location pattern for a distance of two blocks including both sides of the street. • Buildings located farther from the build-to line that provide a courtyard, steps, entryway, arcade, plaza or other pedestrian-oriented design features which maintains the build-to line. • Buildings with reduced setbacks that reflect the predominant surrounding or desired development pattern. • Buildings oriented to face public rights-of-way. • Separation between buildings that provide adequate useable space such as an alley or open space compliant with the requirements of these Guidelines. • Developments which provide coverage similar to surrounding properties and/or that meet the desired vision of the character district. 6 0 0 Y Inappropriate: • Buildings that break up the common build-to line by locating farther back or forward than the predominant block patterns on the subject's site and the opposite side of the street. • Corner lots that do not maintain the location pattern for a distance of two blocks including both sides of the street. • Buildings separated at a distance which precludes the provision of Guideline- compliant alleys and open space. • Separations between buildings that are out of scale and proportion with the district's existing or desired development pattern. • Buildings which do not address the primary street. Height: New development and redevelopment should respect the vertical height of existing or approved adjacent buildings and contribute to a pedestrian scale. The apparent height of a building/development can be influenced and augmented by a combination of stepbacks, varying building heights and horizontal features such as colonnades, canopies, awnings, cornice lines, string courses, wide windows, etc. Appropriate • Building form which visually relates to surrounding buildings and the desired character of the area with regard to mass, scale, height, width and depth. • Buildings that have a distinct "base," "middle" and "cap." • Low-rise buildings and/or those with long facade widths that accentuate vertical elements such as entrances and columns, or by breaking up the facade plane into a greater number of smaller vertical masses. • Mid- and high-rise buildings that utilize horizontal elements that minimize the apparent height of a building such as balconies, banding, cornice and parapet lines, etc. • High-rise buildings that use one or more of the following depending on overall building height and the existing or desired character of the surrounding area: ? The width of the upper portions of buildings reduced to minimize the overall building mass (reducing the size of the floor plate). ? Building stories or/stepbacks differentiated by architectural features including but not limited to coping, balustrades, cornice lines, change in materials, etc. ? Stepbacks used as the building increases in height. • Buildings that terminate views emphasize their prominent location through the use of additional height, massing, distinctive architectural treatments and/or other distinguishing features. • Maintaining a consistent building depth when feasible to allow the location of shared parking lots and/or secondary entrances. • Buildings which correspond to the existing and/or desired rhythm and spacing of surrounding buildings through the use of common points of agreement such as windows, doors, recesses, reliefs and other architectural elements. 7 .y • Buildings which maintain the existing and/or desired pattern of the placement and size of windows, doors, shutters, and other architectural elements on adjacent buildings with regard to both the ground floor and upper stories. • Finished floor heights a minimum of two feet above the sidewalk grade for residential buildings within predominantly mixed use or commercial areas. Additional Requirements for Downtown Core along Cleveland Street and Fort Harrison Avenue. Development along Cleveland Street between Myrtle and Osceola Avenues and along Fort Harrison Avenue between Drew and Chestnut Streets. Appropriate: • Development incorporating an architectural style/building type indicative of those found in Downtown Clearwater between 1900 and 1950 and includes: ? 20th Century Commercial Vernacular: One-story or One-Part; ? 20th Century Commercial Vernacular: Two-story or Two-Part; ? Art Deco; ? Art Moderne; ? Chicago School; ? Mediterranean or Mission Influence; ? Mediterranean Revival; ? Neo-Classical; • Buildings which utilize character defining features from any one of the approved architectural styles/building types listed above through the use of contemporary materials. Inappropriate: • Use of multiple and/or conflicting architectural styles within a single building or between several buildings within a single project. Materials and Color: Appropriate: • Materials compatible with the existing and/or desired context of the surrounding area and that are common to the area's historic construction methods/style. • Buildings that are built as high-quality, long-term components to the urban fabric constructed as maintenance free as possible . • Building materials consistent with and relating to the architectural style of the building. • Building materials appropriate to the scale of the building. • The use of contemporary materials adapted to historic design elements. • Storefront level and upper levels that use visually compatible materials. 8 0 0 • Use of the following durable materials within the first three floors of all buildings and recommended for all other floors: ? Wood, stucco and/or or masonry exteriors. ? Masonry exteriors finished in rusticated block.. ? Stucco, brick, stone, etc. applied over concrete block.. ? Horizontal brick or block patterns. ? Storefront side piers, when provided, constructed of the same material as the upper fagade or covered with stucco. ? Pre-cast, cast-in-place or architectural concrete . ? Tile and Any other material found acceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. Inappropriate: • Exterior walls and skins of buildings designed and/or constructed of materials with a limited life expectancy. • Walls constructed of, corrugated or reflective metal panels, and/or textured plywood. • Walls and/or roofs finished with cedar shakes. • Materials incompatible with the architectural style of the building. • Unfinished, exposed concrete block. • The use of the following materials on building exteriors: ? Poorly crafted or "rustic" woodworking and finishing techniques; ? Cedar shakes; ? Plywood (T1-I I siding, etc.); ? Corrugated, mill finish or reflective metal wall panels; ? Expanded metal (except for limited decorative applications); ? Mill finish aluminum extrusions for windows and doorways; ? Unfinished Concrete Masonry Units (CMU or cinder block); and ? Any other material found unacceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. • The use of the following materials on the first three floors of building exteriors: ? Foam except for architectural details and ornamentation ; ? Exterior insulated finish system (EIFS) except for architectural details and ornamentation ; ? Hardboard siding; ? Plastic, metal and or vinyl siding except for single-family dwellings ; ? Fiberglass panels; ? Exposed aggregate (rough finish) ; ? Concrete wall panels; ? Indoor-outdoor carpeting or astro-turf; and ? Any other material found unacceptable by the Community Development Coordinator and/or the Community Development Board, as applicable. 9 • • V Colors Appropriate: • The number and type of building colors appropriate for and consistent with the architectural style. • Low reflectance exterior colors. • Gutters, downspouts, utility boxes, meters, etc. painted as part of the overall color scheme. Inappropriate: • Colors that are garish, gaudy, loud, excessive and ostentatious or that constitute a glaring and unattractive contrast to surrounding buildings. • Main body color that is from the deepest tones of the color wheel. • More than three different colors or color shades used on a single building unless appropriate to the architectural style of the building. • The use of fluorescent or day glow colors. • Black as the predominant exterior building color. • Single color schemes. For example using one color on every surface. • Clashing trim colors that are not complementary to the main body color and serve only to attract attention through their dissonance. As an example, yellow and red are clashing colors and not complementary and only serve to attract attention through their dissonance. • A solid line or band of color or group of stripes used in lieu of architectural detail. • Color used to obscure important architectural features. 10 ? DRAFTS i r INIP 8PI02256 416-418 Cleveland Street Built circa 1911, this two-story masonry commercial building features a two-bay facade on the south side. In 1913, the Clearwater post office was. located in this building. The two storefronts have been modernized. Alterations have been made to the facade at the second- story level to make this building appear to be one with the adjacent Bay View Building, 410- 414 Cleveland Street. Additionally, a metal leaf band was added between the first and second floors of this building and the adjacent building in the 1960s by Tarpon Springs architect Ed Hoffman, Sr. A historic vertical hanging sign, which advertised Schaffer's Cafe in the 1930s, is still found above the west storefront. The historic physical integrity of this resource has been compromised. However, the alterations to the exterior of this building, particularly the application of the metal banding and the scored stucco veneer, appear to be reversible. With the proper rehabilitation, this resource could be considered a contributing resource to a historic district within the Downtown Core. • City of Clearwater Planning and Eligibility Study Historic Resource Reconnaissance Survey of the Downtown Core May 2004 Janus Research 52 0 P M Y E k X G F E 7 a s a 1 e N to It I= 15 la la 1a I7 1 Ft Haruson Avenue 1--- . i i I RETAIL SPACE #1 I 11,758 S0. FT. p? - - - - - - - - - - - - - i E3 5 - TRUCK DOCK SECURITY J n OMCE p I`5 M W ??? p =DELIVERY MECH. AREA o I ESCALATOR Ma[eaFNIGWPIIPrt1f1- 3 Mil 0 p STORAGE =UP I G p p LOBBY 0 o I o o 0 0 S. ELEV. UP 0 p p p 0 ESCALATOR RETAIL SPACE #2 5,143 SO. FT. RETAIL SPACE #4 z m ?? 2,453 S0. F. <a RETAIL SPACE 5 p 10 O I { ?' 084 . '? I I I ? I a vii i I ? I N k a p AESI9AIRAHT #1 EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING I r c ? 6,332 50. FT. RETAIL SPACE #3 I E O 7,085 SO. FT. i i IIII I G 00 ? II 0 0 O a , ? I I I I I C O rVi - - -- - - - -- - --- - -- - -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e Osceola Steel V? A Al LEVEL 1 THEATER FIRST FLOOR PLAN • OPTION 8 u?ra' I 2 ] 4 5 a ] a 9 10 11 12 13 a is is 17 k'WA big Ne. ONb RPY9mf / SubNYbns a 1 N 5 G F E 0 mG a Nlba Str-t a Ra 100 ? Tampa, fRYYtn 35apk. 'S4Y.549.f9GA TO ? • I ma5A9,suo-r aax C Architects CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OSCEOLA STREET CLEARWATER FLOWA THEATER FIRST MRS 081105 woxcY 010-0A0 FLOOR PLAN cw RYL pIE03Q RkL OPTION 8 Al R 0 0 N Y I J w t t T 1 s s 1 e 1 10 II 12 ? A p Is 17 THEATER #9 .01 J K Q w THEATER #7 THEATER #8 w THEATER #5 THEATER #6 w x W 1 I L i M I ? I v I m I a DN I I v I J a DN 1 1 s. ELEV. w w Q w ON I ; THEATER #4. M / ! Q W J Z fn fUjJ U / 2 v TICKETS GS C THEATER #3 THEATER #t i THEATER #2 I , i IN Li l I EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING Al LEVEL 2 THEATER FIRST FLOOR PLAN • OPTION 8 u?r-ray t ] 0 / 5 6 1 9 9 l0 it R u I+ n ?R ?i 0 v N Y N J M c 0 tcn a ?ae?eR., slrN>I buYN mo ? 1'Rmrya, FtOINlA i',IYR2 ? SAN.6N8.1Y6U Tat ? , Rf3.54Y.!60Y Far C ? Architects AN.NMMNMIWItlieO[e+)N R per CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza oeceaA am?r CLFARWAYM FLCRWA a2 0615.05 THEATER FIRST!. MAW FLOOR PLAN O" WL OPTION 8 A2 D L K J H G T E D C 0 C 0 a O 9 M 0 N .y 00 00 2 3 A s 6 1 6 9 10 it 12 13 14 FT. HARR15ON AVENUE 05GEOLA AVENUE CAR COUNT STALL SIZE =9'A" x 18'-0" LEVELS PUBLIC CONDO L K J H C F E Al FIRST V20R-r-a STO. HC STO. HC - SEVENTH 190 4 SIXTH 206 4 FIFTH 206 4 FOURTH 141 3 48 2 THIRD 180 3 SECOND 144 3 GROUND 81 6 546 15 650 14 TOTAL 561 664 1225 1- W W H nQ 1R-. Q J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ar wiwn a ewm awa w: wo ca awrt¢ en¢¢ uo Dream rw uu a m n awawn Wn, sl Rmrw ?tt xoc a nK w.t agar uursrrn w nin swi R a:o n w oenRm ro vn moral nw a mma?nov ra un winos wArmn.nmr nc w,mi ttwmw a arnR rev HFwr a avow o?w mow m asaoa+e v?r casnNa awE salt tVMaR?nw w xWtNN aCN-:Cl [r. sa ND ovER uYS n<ff.¢ ra ravwrs uo amm oKlmm mom ??? s v?mim a s nE-1 a mwM n?ror wwow N. Oofa Raves- / Sub."-.'a . D 10 E iiaakax Sbeof 941a 100 • Tzlapa, Roffda 33642 $13.549.1900 To§ C Barrios 813.549,1401 Fax MOdlikp'huAoYrdlN?6btam wwwJ)& *rbmrf *9rdKWELCgC Architects 0102 cr ; A . . - CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza. OSCEOLA STREET CLEARWATER. FLOWA DAM 081505 RRO[C1: D703W.00 DRAM FIRST FLOOR PLAN C~EECKM. A101 M L K J H G F E D C 0 C f a CD O 8 Ln 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to 11 12 13 14 FT. NARRISON AVENUE OSGEOLA AVENUE V2014 PLAN CAR COUNT STALL SIZE=9'-0'x i6'-0" LEVELS PUBLIC CONDO STD. HC STD. HC SEVENTH 198 4 SIXTH 206 4 FIFTH 286 4 FOURTH 141 3 48 2 THIRD 188 3 SECOND 144 3 GROUND 81 6 546 15 650 14 _ TOTAL 561 664 1225 I I 1 1 1 S 1 1 5 1 5 j I 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12, 13 14 L K J H C F E .ro r? mxwrv a ewss x.aas,mn .D .m xxc wum Harm uo areom mP u¢ a um m camEDna xm me srcaim worn. sDra a n<aas asors rs w Pars sxu c a? a, w Dmo¢D m.av rwsw tier. w memw.a Pw un nwra anssrw xwvr nc xermc cwwsa a waa e,wos ww muxu oww w 11 A iui CaSniNE mwk swn n5PSp0ne%Da a xLVpla ra -14--1 U - aD DMw 4K M GIS uPeNgrs ua Dp a a51t®-AY K P4aAga w & Dx wBKCI a-G Pupil "P?JCAtIDIt No. Dale Redsiws / Submissions D 'too E MalMen SAtmgt Susie 100 9 Tampa, Ftorlda 38682 ?• $£3.549.1900 T31 C , 819.544.1901 Fax InfaWkabadomar Wtact&wan wwwAkkakarlwueMbebAMn Architects 9 0 gA0D .6 CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OSCEOLA BiREET CLEARWATER, FLORIDA DAIS 081505 Dosa.ao SECOND moxcn : DRAM FLOOR PLAN WECM: A102 L M N J H G F E 0 C c N c 0 f a N O 8 ui in C. m 00 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 - 10 11 12 13 14 FT. PARR15ON AVENUE OSCEOLA AVENUE 1 I W I I ? i cl) i i Q I i ? i Q J i i i i I i CAR COUNT STALL SIZE =9'-O' x 1W-0- LEVELS PUBLIC CONDO STD. HC STD. HC SEVENTH 190 4 SIXTH 206 4 FIFTH 206 4 FOURTH 141 3 48 2 THIRD 180 3 SECOND 144 3 GROUND 81 6 546 15 650 14 TOTAL 861 664 1225 RD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 L N J H C F E m nE omPn a aMP eumw rw auiP, nasP uo maam ca us a uu a neArnw eu ox senwm eaoxn. xa¢ a n<aAS amts .uwa?wn a n.ws wu a wm n w oaiaso m.ar aue2 neN w mmwrov ew m Sum. wrsaxx .Nwr rm eP?w a e.xP e..?us oleo 6HaN ama woP .e u:e s¢ w wNNONen ®asrs M?v tw3nNa tMa aP[6e51eeAwa.:llw M xgArex a i t.N-1-Ji-i A. Y6 uO wxP UK aF OP[ aPAY1YPR M tdaf [QtlfHa NRa Mr a MiPhO w a M fwftl a epaeK et?r teVGAeI 0 '!00 E Msdtaan S!rmef Sal+n too B k Tampa, Ftarlda 38802 er a 81$.549.1900 TO C Barrios 018,540.1901 Fax hroeak.eenourc0uea4w0 .nr "orberrbweM eatsAam Architects h aYg , CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OSCEOU STREET CLEARWATM FLOADA DA E 0615.05 PRWECI: 039340.00 DRAW : THIRD FLOOR PLAN 04EMED A103 M L K J H G F E D C 0 c 0 a N ti O 8 N 1n 0 C C"I 3 14 2 J t 5 6 7 6 9 1 tt 12 Fr. NARRi5ON AVENUE CAR COUNT STALL SIZE =9'-0' x 18'-W LEVELS PUBLIC CONDO L K J H G F E 4 08CEOLA AVENUE STD. HC STD.HC SEVENTH 190 4 SIXTH 205 4 FIFTH 206 4 FOURTH 141 3 48 2 THIRD 180 3 SECOND 144 3 GROUND 81 6 546 15 650 14 TOTAL 561 664 1225 1- LLI LLl F Q 'Q J Al F vsD'a-o' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .¢ .q m oum mrin. xo maov ld Vi d,uM x M14fAd xM M[ S4dx4 cAOt[(, xD'k d M[ 4f.SS OWii MMYxWxt d R.MS 4tVl R V5m BY d DIDIRO A WY xRIDI. PW, d dAFV1rcA' !d IM NRML4 xMldlxl xP91! uxdC xAAT/JCIGY ?EF(dYe d diwx xfpY MpMlee e9?R Nrt MAd 4d[f NSMefrrlxSnCx x uvli d -2--- El uD ONR U4 M OLYt Nex4xfNR uW 4fm4 p5p04e xRM vAY BF nIEM®d 8 K 9MECt d xIdNC V?Iq! N. Date RedW- / Suemimipes 0 1D0 "e 11Aamaa Stlmet ??a 1aD Tampa. Ftorl4a 33602 813.949.1900 To! C 813.949.1901 Fax k foobakoreuric"n Mloab.eom mJWorlonbnrdit"t"= Architects fFnDnna: CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza 08CEOLA STREET CLEAMATER, FLOMA DATE. 081505 FOURTH "DRA?rs+T, 030340.00 FLOOR PLAN CHE04D A104 M L K 3 H G F E D C 0 0 f a N O 8 Ln to 0 0 N 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 1o 11 12 13 14 FT. HARRISON AVENUE GAR COUNT ?.. _.. _.._. ._.._.._.._.._. STALL SIZE =9'•O' X 18'.G" i i i i LEVELS PUBLIC _ CONDO S S S S 5 S S S S S 5 S 5 S S S ! STD. HC STD. HC i I SEVENTH 190 4 1 SIXTH 206 4 S 1 FIFTH 206 4 i S FOURTH 1 3 46 2 S I 80 i S j SECOND 144 3 i S i GROUND 81 6 j S i 546 15 650 14 I 5 i TOTAL 561 664 1725 1 S 1 1 S 1 1 1 1 S S 1 1 S S i .._.._.._..-.._..----'_--.._ .._.._-._.._..-- - i S S ! S ! ! S S S S S I S I I 1 S S 1 1 1 I I I S 1 I S I I 1 S 1 S 1 I S S J S I 1 I j S S I ? S 1 1 S S I S 1 S S 1 I j S S S j S ' S I I 1 S S 1 I 5 _.-_.._.._..-`-_ 1 1 ? S S 1 1 S 1 S ;; S S 1 S ? ? I j S S S i i S ? i j S S i S ? S S ? S i j S S ? S S 1 1 S-6 S S S W S i ? j S S S S i 5 1 S 5 1 S S S 1 ?/ I S i 1 I Q j S y I. J 1 s y i S S S S S S S 5 5 S S S S S S S S S LS S S S S S S S i i i ? ¢5 i S 0 S S S S 5 i i -------------------- OSCEOLA AVENUE Al FIFTH v2W-1-o• 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 L K J H G F E s sxxa?i uo xsa RSUno.Emun..oaxsan rw uu a xo w owccrer em wE svEaim wam xsK a n¢ auR ¢wa ususEVars as n 5 .ui x uRR a a osa sn m .rr pxsax u%w o»wsea an ur wwasE wxrsmw wemw enamor v exxss ax?s,aox xo rs eacna iau[or rs . -M.u -wow xwmouas gmnEwE u.. Easn?urt mwE-T bSa-Ana a wo..ax ff ic1.-E- 11....w omla ux¢ a RE¢ uauscrrs uu rows aaon xsam a.a xcuw a x mE we4ci a wmc oxsxs -A- No. Dole Reulsfoes / Submissloro D 100 E 54rmRaa Strao1 SURD too Tamps, Rarkla 99602 813.649.1900 Tui C 813.549,1901 Fax MoewkMrdatraMwU.row mN Wbo111woleNloobern Architects ar ^aD26s; , CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza 08CE011A STREET CLEARWATER,FLORDA DATE: 0&15105 RRotcc 03D340.00 DRAM : FIFTH FLOOR PLAN CXEFXEO A105 0 c 0 a C0 Ln In C) N 00 N L K J H G F E D C D 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 FT. PARR15ON AVENUE i i i i i i ! FS s s s s s s s s s s s s s Fs ! I 1 I I I I i S i 1 S I i S i S i I S i 1 S 1 I 5 1 I I S S I I S S I j.._.._..----------- .___.._..?..?____..-.._..? ! S S I I I 1 1 I I ! S ! I S S S S S S I 1 I S S I I I I 1 S I ! S I I j S I S I S I I S S j f S S I j ! ? S I 1 5 ?? LL- S i I S I S CONDO RAMP I $ S 1 1 S S S j j S S I I I S S I I S 0 1 I O S S j S j S S j ! S ® 0 O 1 1 S S S I O I i S S i i ¦i O i j S ? S S ? S i i S S O S S i F.,. S S-0 S S S I Lu 0 I f S S S S 1 S 1 S S 5 S 1 IL S S 1 ? I Q i S ? y i i S y S i S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S LS 5 5 S S s S ! I I j S SAS I I I O S S p S 5 1 I? / \ $ III 4 ---------------------------------------- 05CEOLA AVENUE CAR COUNT STALL SIZE =9'•0' x 18'-0' LEVELS PUBLIC CONDO SM. H HC STD. HC SEVENTH 190 4 SIXTH 206 4 FIFTH 206 4 FOURTH 141 3 48 2 THIRD 180 3 SECOND 144 3 GROUND 81 6 546 15 650 14 TOTAL 561 664 1225 g3 Al SIXTH FLOOR PLAN 1/20'-1.0' 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 L K J C. H F E R aMaw.w. wumnRMCMOaMUVrw aWFt?l Mm mf SvEwi01 wa0+. xME 6 mf OFAS aAM A1gMi¢uwR a MN4 uwu 0 am n a ream m Mn R w rie, a mawem rw u. MMMrs Mn?w?ra Mmwi ce nma wWmw a aM¢v a.eMOr wrn mx T R . A ortnx uoa ie o.sc uc al wwm>sao nmo9?¢ wfr MwwwM?RM M MaAaa w ?.c:r-:-»-? fr. sn rro ama uMs R R1wR>flar AC MUR MWWEUwR up K5w! 6'A? NkM Wr M[ P?RMRO w H Mf -1 D 100 E ma4Nen St:aet Salta 100 B k Tampa, Ftar`ia 33602 a er 513.549.1800 Tel Barrios C 813.948.190] Fax bf90ba b9rr6mMMt"ft.C0m WWWWkw6mbwMlt"llsu 0 Architects AACDU7aa CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza 08CEOLA STFAMT CLEMWATM FLOWA DAIS: °6.1505 oa SIXTH M. T:1°W'?°° FLOOR PLAN n° A106 O xn c 0 a 0 In r-i N N to O N .-1 Go M L N J H G F E D C 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 t4 I i i i r S S S S S S S S S S S S S. S S FS 1 I j s S I I S I S I S S S S S S 1 1 S S S S S S 1 i S S S S S S i j S S S S S S S S 1 1 1 ! S S I 1 1 1 1 S S 1 S S 5 S 1 1 S S S S S S MECH ROOM 1 i 5 S i i i i S S S 5 S 5 _ 1 S S S S S S S S S f I ? S j I ! S S S CONDO S S S 1 S 1 ! j ' s RAMP S ' s s s S S S FLOOR S S P s j i S S S S S S i i i s 0 S S i i I S S S S S I j S S j 1 S S S S S o 0 i i I S S S S 0 S S j 1 S S S 9 s 0 1 S S S S i I S S S S S 0 S S I j S S S S S-6 S S S 1 1 S S 9 0 I I S S 1 S S d S 9 S S I j S 11 .6 S 5 S S 1 S I 1 i S y I 1 i 1 S y 1 1 ' S S S S S S S S 5 5 S S S S S S 5 S S S S 1 i I S S S S S 1 1 1 S 0' S i 1 1 S S 1 j S S i i S i CAR COUNT STALL SIZE =9'-0' x 18'-0- LEVELS PUBLIC CONDO _ STD. -- HC STS HC SEVENTH 190 4 SIXTH 206 4 FIFTH 206 4 FOURTH 141 3 48 2 THIRD 180 3 SECOND 144 3 GROUND 81 6 546 15 650 14 TOTAL 561 664 1225 Ai S 3/20'4 O' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 L N J H C F E' .ro rK xv Na axon e?WW wm+irzcn nc aoww[w®. Ma ww w.wam EW utt d Nw n Owwtnd wm mE 9Rdm WOACI, xPiE 6 A2 iWK WMII wwNRYEXR W w-T m(v .vl W v4? W W 06¢0.F0 M un YWEtlL IBl W miPpR.?d Nf Mi 0.wtiff wu?SRwx me wemx rtwnma W ewmi vuwes wwwcrs. we . ' wnwc: vm®rnd wwd w . wvww dmsc umd .e u.:c xc we uwwmowo maW W[ v.Y Wx511N1E wwE YdET wSAwwP9A W.x n WAnd of f.Cb-1-U-? FI. 26 xxA OIMFP 4ei no out uwrmars uo Wed9 uxiuae ova vxY w: oxm?m W W mE-1 s rdvxc P- xveuuna D 100 E mad):orz Street Suits 100 Tampa, F1oHdb 88602 813.549.1900 Fat C , 8?3.549.1901 Fax IN0ObNtWbWr10*&fddt*Gt@.vm vvvbakxbmHewe81166tsx m Architects CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OSCEOLA STFET CLEAMATM FLOROA DATE: 081505 SEVENTH oa 0°3Q00 FLOOR PLAN OECXEb A107 1 2 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 17 14 4 L K J H G F E 0 C O c t 0 CL CL 00 0 M LO 0 0 N kD ti OD ----NIGH PARAPET WALL UNIT INFORMATION SERVICE AREA: 4202 SOFT BUILDING FLOOR LEVELS: 8 -II (1) LEVEL CONDO FLOOR LEVELS: R2-R5 NO. OF UNITS PER FLOOR 10 UNITS UNIT UNIT AREA BALCONY AREA UNIT I 1949 SOFT Ill SOFT UNIT 2 1169 SOFT 586 SOFT UNIT 3 1651 SOFT 214 SOFT UNIT 4 1041 SOFT 19 SOFT UNIT 5 1539 SOFT 214 SOFT UNIT 6 1511 SOFT 198 SOFT UNIT 1 1314 SOFT 198 SOFT UNIT 8 1135 SOFT 348 SOFT UNIT 9 1515 SOFT 211 SOFT UNIT 10 1999 SOFT 369 SOFT ?-HOU5E A i f i i Al EIGHTH V20--r-O' i 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 FT. PARR15ON AVENUE I E N J K G F E nay ,n µ. P? m.. w ?.m.w.?.Pww? wu?wan wMa, ?w.?«an.??wwW g?PaWM?ns? nMrt att assn wswnwa.mi w wuwH rcLLC1+-i-n-? n, sa wo omm ua H e[q wPUCiYa'15 uq 4LYnw nkl? wp(w Pn [ v.pi¢p p [ MF 9AfL, 6 vFbat P.Nn M`9JCAAaI L. Dote Be%431- / Submissions 0 'W0 E 5iedN4,, $tree= S.tta 100 Tamps: Rorke 951302 813.849,1900 To: Barrios C 615.54$.4941 Fax Maw mbi?egr? Architects p:12,fi CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza 08CEOU 8TNEET CIEN WATM FUMA aW-- 08.15.05 EIGHTH PRORCr: 07034afq ?w» FLOOR PLAN CHECK A108 M N J H 6 F E D C C 0 c 0 a 1^ 0 Ln Ln 0 0 N ti co 2 7 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 17 u UNIT INFORMATION SERVICE AREA: 4202 SOFT BUILDING FLOOR LEVELS: 8 -II (1) LEVEL ROOF BELOW 4 000 ROOF BELOW UNIT 10 X10 UNIT 9 UNIT 8 X6O X50 ROOF BELOW CONDO FLOOR LEVELS: R2-R5 NO. OF UNITS FER FLOOR 10 UNITS UNIT UNIT AREA BALCONY AREA UNIT 1 1940 SOFT 111 SOFT UNIT 2 1169 SOFT 586 SOFT UNIT 3 1651 SQFT 214 SOFT UNIT 4 1041 5QFT 19 5QFT UNIT 5 1539 SQFT 214 SQFT UNIT 6 1511 SQFT 118 SQFT UNIT 1 1413 SQFT 118 SQFT UNIT 8 1135 SQFT 348 SOFT UNIT 9 1515 SQFT 211 SQFT UNIT 10 1999 SOFT 369 SQFT C Al vsox?r 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 L N J H C F E ?amnc axaa e.e?.mn w.rs m.no. m.a .,o onaoFD roa U![MAxDp q..[ngl PR6 M4K DE9Gl. upMpYev3 D9 R.xe ?pK ?? ? ?: qaa ? >m ?wq?a[D q? q.gmNrt nME sIXF6MYwAWFlr.'01 iM NOAiNN P lL]f1-T-1 E1. Aa W DMp U.i M ttK .pp5fu[nR uD ¢Ti5 g9ag99 MRn x[E BE DrlpRp p S M 9REC1 D• RMxt OrRxr NttGngl No.' Date Rexsims / Su6missims D 400 E 6lastaaR $troot saga 100 Tampa, Modda 33602 813-549.9900 Tat C 093.549,1961 Feu MaGkapmbutdMactuao wrw bak41k4s106WChtt4Cb tom Architects J n1a02"g ; . . CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza Oemou STREET CLEAMATM FLOMA AM 08.15.05 NINTH - TWELTH DR`r °'°'"°°° FLOOR PLAN CHECKM. A109 L M N H 6 F E D C c 0 c 0 F a 0 0 N B Ln N O r-i 2 3 ? 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 to UNIT INFORMATION SERVICE AREA: 3631 SQFT BUILDIWG FLOOR LEVELS: 12-23 (11) LEVELS CONDO FLOOR LEVELS: R6-RIl NO. OF UNITS PER FLOOR 12 UNITS UNIT UNIT AREA BALCONY AREA UNIT 1 1940 SOFT Ill 5QFT UNIT 2 1169 5QFT 692 SQFT UNIT 3 1651 SOFT 215 6QFT UNIT 4 1041 SOFT 81 SQFT UNIT 5 1510 SQFT 214 SQFT UNIT 6 1512 5QFT 189 SQFT UNIT 1 1536 SOFT 214 5QFT UNIT 8 1413 SQFT 190 SQFT UNIT 5 1501 SQFT 214 SQFT UNIT IC 1415 5QFT 349 SQFT UNIT II 1514 SQFT 211 SQFT UNIT 12 1999 SOFT 36S SQFT Al THIRTEENTH/TWENTY FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 L A J H D F E ? wwmr a Aaw .r.¢ rrff.rta mom w ormam rw 'i u4 w wD p [wxF[IiW •n rx( m[mm wain. xwf Q nE ttK OE9wf, unwRUwrs w nin ?I suu x use m w amcsu a wr owsw mA w waw?rex rw arc navos wrs¢rcx Mwmr owAC xvaw:cmn caa s . w? orws mmw .e use sc ew uxwswao ummes xw msnart rc+rc A T ws.wwaru.m? ..aA rc:ra-u-i [r. xa wo omw ura ? wa wr+imnn w mac usau;n was wr a wxrno a a nr sem v wwo oxmr uuwwA Na Date Rerislone / Suamiadws 0 100 E Madtcon Suoot Sulfa 100 Tampa, Florida 39602 813.549.1900 Tel C I 013.549,1904 Fax MroewkrearburWt eb"m www.MkwboalnwcMhcb.com Architects A ea 10 ra 2 CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OWEOLA STREET CLEARWATER, FLOWA DATE. 0&15.05 THIRTEENTH - PROJECT. °10'x°° TWENTY FOURTH CHEara FLOOR PLAN A113 N L N J H c i E D C c 0 c J= 0 CL CL N N B to to CD N .y co 2 7 A 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNIT INFORMATION SERVICE AREA: 3686 SOFT IWG FLOOR LEVELS- BUILD 24-21 (4) LEVEL CONDO FLOOR LEVELS: R18-R22 NO. OF UNITS PE R FLOOR 10 UNITS UNIT UNIT AREA BALCONY AREA UNIT 1 1950 SOFT 111 SOFT UNIT 2 2102 SOFT 392 SOFT UNIT 3 1651 SOFT 211 SOFT UNIT 4 1522 SOFT 214 SOFT UNIT 5 2496 SOFT 295 SOFT UNIT 6 1538 SOFT 214 SOFT UNIT 1 1510 SOFT 214 SOFT UNIT 8 1420 SOFT 321 SOFT UNIT 9 1519 SOFT 211 SOFT UNIT 10 1999 SOFT 369 SOFT FIFTH/TWENTY t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 E J H D F E n and a euas suYa vaaa rurs. m seaom rvv ?'. uu a uo d 3.3.[4,3. an rx minim waECw. wA 6 nrz oEM omas +w,.r¢w?, a nwa n a as®o rv wea n3., a o.?ow.na. a .wr nm? rn.rsmn ?>«ar n?a ?Ye . muYU won ? sc sc se aanarnn usi?wE YYV CaSnNh AAR SE(dEw v5,edneYUna d vwuna 6 i.CN4-n-1 R. s:3. A. OmfR NM mF 3.k uYUaYam W pF.,ai pm090 ?WY YYV H>.hX,A a H n 9,aF[t a' ?Ved4 aY,ww M9{KAna, No. Data Revisions J Submissions 0 wo E Modica, Smaer Salto 19D _ Tamp,, Florida 33802 813.549,1900 Tel C 813.549,1901 Fax Mom tmAokoAOnb?ueMlootlwoom Architects AGd a2! o CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza CMMOLA STREET CLEARWATER,FLOM A DATE` OWS-05 TWENTY FIFTH- oA XMED 030340.00 TWENTY EIGHTH c"Ea"" FLOOR PLAN A125 Y L K J X c F F. 0 C O N c r 0 a Q+ B Ln Ln 0 N .y 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNIT INFORMATION SERVICE AREA: 3686 SQFT 5UILDINCa FLOOR LEVELS: 28 (1) LEVEL CONDO FLOOR LEVELS: RIB-R22 NO. OF UNITS PE R FLOOR 10 UNITS UNIT UNIT AREA BALCONY AREA UNIT I 1950 SQFT III 5QFT UNIT 2 2102 SQFT 392 SQFT UNIT 3 1651 SOFT 211 5Qr-T UNIT 4 1522 SQFT 214 SQFT UNIT 5 2496 SQFT 295 SQFT UNIT 6 1538 SQFT 214 SQFT UNIT 1 1510 SQFT 214 SQFT UNIT 8 1420 SQFT 321 SQFT UNIT 9 1519 SQFT 211 SQFT UNIT 10 1999 SQFT 369 SQFT Al TWENTY NINTH V20•-f-m 2 3 4 .5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 m.ca eaxa xe rcuam rw uu w wo x am4oiw xx?ME s? xmur. xwE v ice ws assrs. uxlxmurs m nux suu e<?ss erw?r®murvx?rsw. ?.mma+w?nw ttn u.w ¢vurswxa xr?wr .rmc rsrn M. a . iarwrmd¢ unw ?e use ss. ra uw.?a® omssse rt MAW SEW T VrsVA?.1xx w MGmx d 1 C]v-:-x-? Et 59 uq OM UM M GAt.?WUXtlg2 M'A Ot9w4 p`a49?xxw ??v[f?miR?wRMx6FGr e' Nn I-T .wirnw No. Dote Rew,W- / Submissions L K J H F G E D 106 E pkaalaai 9beat Soto 104 • Tampa, F3arida 33602 813.548.1104 Toi C , 818.540,1901 Fag 1nf0obakwW rkm8m t*Gt&* 10 mbak*AttAbrrditmtt.com Architects AAOM2AA t CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza 06MOLA STR&f 0" WAML FLOMA DAIS 081505 TWENTY NINTH ? ?°'"D°° FLOOR PLAN CEECXM. A129 C O w C 0 ,r a 0 N O0 N 10 ti ro u L K J H G i E 0 C B 2 3 l 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 t4 UNIT INFORMATION F- SERVICE AREA: 3150 SOFT BUILDIWG FLOOR LEVELS: 29 (1) LEVEL CONDO FLOOR LEVELS: R3 - EXECUTIVE NO. OF UNITS PER FLOOR 4 UNITS UNIT UNIT AREA BALCONY AREA UNIT 1 1624 SOFT 431 SOFT UNIT2 2351 SQFT 438 SOFT UNIT3 1991 SOFT 219 SOFT UNIT 4 2013 6QFT 225 SOFT OW Al THIRTIETH FLOOR PLAN v20'-T-0' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 L K J H C F E 6 BMN 6ANL6 YPirtt2 wL u9 vfpF C.1U?. n'¢M4 u0 ptllpR? N v& M A•9 N tOMR[vOV'/M M[ SftO? 4AOFfi, xpE R 111E Wd 0[9v4 upAx¢Yd15 Oa RAx9 9WL AF V3? By W OYL030 n] An RPM1.'. Fmv Ot f0i0gAllpn [® AxY gPtro4 vnAMOFKR nMLi WaxnC rtOx@ILnOx Na[6 6 ABCPVxv.A01PIl uqx IB 4SL 4L fOB NuvmOeIIO DIffA04VE vAYtPSnNR MWF Sp(i bLDVxOVaAnOx w w01An01 Q 1.CiA•i-]I-1 FI. ff2 nx0 OM[R UK M OF/S MRML[Yp6 AXO OE9dS T.Q?1 MWi.PA- NUM4BIFP-1- UgKAIWI O 100 F 51a6isan Street suite 807 • Tampa, FlOrfda 33602 o 813.549,1900 Tai C , 823.849.1909 Fax M}oOGkabYric"mMGeheom vr711dkk*rbklHO W dlh6ObdgK Architects AAD CY31 CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza 08CEae sir CLEAMA7M FLOFWA DAM 0815.05 PROJECT 030340.00 DRANN THIRTIETH FLOOR PLAN CRKCKM. A130 N L K J H G f E' 0 C C 0 c a n M 0 vi to 0 0 10 2 3 t 5 6 7 3 g 10 11 12 13 14 UNIT INFORMATION SERVICE AREA: 3200 SQFT BUILDING FLOOR LEVELS: 30 - 31 (2) LEVEL CONDO FLOOR LEVELS: R24-R25-PRE6IDENTAL NO. OF UNITS PER FLOOR 3 UNITS UNIT UNIT AREA BALCONY AREA UNIT I 2191 SQFT 113 SOFT UNIT 2 24bb SOFT 438 50FT UNIT 3 2111 SOFT 558 SQFT Al THIRTY ONE/THIRTY TWO V20e-f? 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 L K J H C F E AW a0 P4lPwn P exxw ffFxP4 F.OY4 Po OPUOm Nv .w0 d WeftePi eM 0(RDIFD NNttt x04 6 M B .1 Aau A w RAxS 9uLL BE vkD w w PBPOSB A AVV Pwt7l PxK w tdNMAttN F. Ae NPIf6. Xx1SUg1 •Broli etFN 2vnSGM 6 Brxw eAaPPeaaertfn. iK awpG 4vFOPJCM xfAER R Pmww PME IxOw to uSC A< Ae lnwnaxap v6PP,?a Pnv PMBNfr BewC AP6e uRwwpMAnw x NtUW 6 LCN-1-)?-i Fe. k6 uP Peiw UK Te PPS 4?eMiR AW OwQT PSPf30IUp xAV k exPxR w A n<91B[!? 6 eaw¢ tAipi At1.. nGl D '100 is ktedHaP Sz;voe SPHO 100 ? Tampa, Sior#Sa 19802 I 319.549.1300 70, C 219.548.1901 Fax YrtoebakwEwAoomMecto eom •wwzmweortburet4tMUom Architects AAMOVM CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OBCEOLA 871UEET - CLEMMATM FLORWA DAIS 0315.05 cT. G°300 THIRTY ONE & o" THIRTY TWO aeaDk FLOOR PLAN A131 M L N J M C F E 0 C C O N L 0 >r f a M 9 N N O 0 00. 10 11 12 13 14 2 3 / 5 6 1 B 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 L x J X C F E 1N ne RWtQiv w BIM eAwm uvnR[rz .pP rFm Pttrxa flQW4+a UIaWORW M uZ w Wa x fuKCAp Ww ME flF6tP TIEtt w9[ w lxE WGf, PFSwi A9xui¢v[xR w RuY PWU s u¢P er w om? ro.+r Wxw Rs. w mrow?Ww rw,xr nwna Wursoea enw? PIF PEl(+waW1YpR [M 0.9US PSUC£0 4WM Wv C 1ARN4P w R MF-11 w RWiW 1-T MVUOPI Nq Dale R."ms / ylaml-5.-s D 1D4 E tMsmsan Stmet Salta 100 Tampa, Radda 33902 813.5491900 TO C 913.91P.1901 Fax 1MoM W kMOvFbmdmmlta.cam www&&kNhMIOWMIM *c%x m Architects 02r3 A A- . ' CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OSCEOLA STREET CLEARWATM FLOWA DAM 0915.05 PCT. W: 030340.00 THIRTY THREE FLOOR PLAN d1E016D A133 O N C a ,r a N C3 M 1n O N 00 00 Y L K J H D F E D C D 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 It 12 13 14 1 I 1 I I I I ' 1 I ;1 I : I ': I 1 I 1 sl sl =1 1 I 1 jl A MECH. TOWER ROOF r.,,..? 1 / p I ' ----------- - - 1 1 , \f `L . I ? 11 1 1 p Y I !` 'II k: 1 I I 1 1 11 II M'' I 1 : I I I 1 ROOF B LOW uNit 3 X20 i SECOND STORY `i x?0 SZO?j ROOF BELOW V I+ 1 yl I I ? ? I ?1 J ?? ?o¢l LOW ROOF BELOW I ??? I ill I !I 1 j I !: i " ZI i Al THIRTY FOUR FLOOR PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 UsE a xw x N.f[IM' aM m[ ?Epio) xrom xa[ a mGi a@aS :w?r¢ywrs a -T EE ?ae,a?maaar??aara?a, ?axnx.??„rs?xna-n a?xEaw?m,? a??rs.?Kem>B az:a?x.ax?a?aaaa? CpSaNR T- YaEi eiSwPRaoxutnx n xM r 1 Et. X A'0 OixEV UTS nE at wnramwn un omas name wmx x.r s oenx>m ae-A- mr sear s wwxa v.m, No. Dote Rev; ws / Submissions L K J H G F E D itl0 E ?ad:s49 34reoY Salsa 100 • Tampa, PibrKla 33642 813.849.1900 Tel G 893.649.1901 Fay InfoehtllMYAbwWtectuA m ttRAskarbefdowthRecte com Architects ?F bC296 : CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OBCEOLA STREET CLEARWATM FLOWA DATE. Dd1505 PRojEcT. ANK 030340.00 THIRTY FOUR R FLOOR PLAN EaM. A134 C N C j_- 0 Q OD Go 0 C4 n - Go 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 tt 12 13 14 I I I I I I I I I I ? ? I I I ? I I 000 I I I I ? i I i ri., .. I `ug r I ^^ n` i v 'r n (. Nr l.t.' r c t a V Et1 i 4 7 % A, ? y ; C G, , I 1 . v I Al EIGHTH/ELEVENTH FLOOR UNIT PLANS Y L K J X C F E 0 C 5 A t 2 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 L K N c F E MMPn R p.V91 Mua NeIMTi nG uq 411[ W®. e¢?FY. M R'?ROM V4 d xo M mrttna ?M M[ a?M eMt(Q. ?x R M lV6 Re)6 MWeklBlrs w nIR 9w1 R SAD or w uS1? 4 M ACnI all, a tR3'w1AF iMl d1 MIi6VZ WR4101 MTMn >k11 oa ?RavkP Mwnc mxaacMn »xms rs. mew mu¢ wa,a use sc a dwMdan ommxe •?1 mSaNk iUw 4m, •S/JAOMIVI M M4ew R iG1tie-a-? F[ 5E6 us OMA UK x axc xsMimsirs Mu asoa m,®wu u. K xnnm a a rK xema rt?ac v.w xnuMK 0 kl0 E NadMon Street suits 100 Tampa, FlatEda 33602 s 813.546.1900 Tel C ? • 813.546.'!801 Fax MfaNadtslbwAo{stMRKh?a Architects CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza 08CEOLA STREET CLEARWATM FLOHDA Dare 0&1&05 UNIT FLOOR PROEM. 0°300 PLANS CWCKM A531 I 1 2 ] 1 " I I I i I I K I I I I I I x I I G I I F I I I E ' I i I 0 I I I c ? I L O I C) i ? B W I L 0 01 N n L. A Al TWELTH/TWENTY FOUI 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 13 14 T 4 5 6 7 6 9 to it 12 13 14 L K J H C F E rxwrenr ayaassaapma?ec ras vna. ram rmsrm rw us a r r asacnox.s a amm nio¢r. sos r ncsrx sss¢ rrms a n.xs sw r use n a ora® a .rraast xr. a muosia ra r. rva wam.xar rm. rtsraa r ara sows .a. .wc snmucw ? s uweonn ?mis ... o.snar wr san sswsrn.a ..sera r ax:-n-? rr. as r oin. ua K ¢¢ rrperrs r omas ms® wa r. a wam a s a seal r mc.+s.r asses 0 109 E maolao0 Street soft wo Baker Tampa, Florida 33602 613.b4911900 TO; Ban-ios 819349.1901 Paz Architects FA0002M CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza OBCWLA STF*W CLEAMATM FLOMA aW- 691595 UNIT FLOOR ? "°'°'?°°° PLANS CHECaD. A532 U L N J N G f E 0 c C O c r 0 f a m 9 Go 0 N n A 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 4 Fn .. .. _ a fi 7 b 3 10 11 12 13 14 L K J H G F E w Hawn[ •m, v< w?a¢vup. xnrp Ax maommv u[aYm[m+xcm[ ?[vvsm woaa aane oca [wRF[FmprsaPµa au [ uka er a aau®[ xr rwsa rw, w mYaAn rw xr Fwo[ w.rnrw [xpr Fnm P? m wa waew AAa. went [rYmxia waa a A --U- M . n wAVFweo [vea[ YAYaaSPNk Mq [pSi Y4Ma)xxeY F N¢1na I -}-- Fr. qp Ya pAg 4r¢ YF 6d AFWQpR Yb Odo6a[1 E0 xflM wr [ PApp q [ MF autta rtiwc PAlprt /PaRAnO[ D 100 b WOO*. 3baai bWta 100 Baker Tamp[, Florida M02 813.549.1900 Tai C Barrios 813349.1001 Fax Architects m1Dak4u0aeMauaARae4aoal f n?fi, CW Acqua at the Downtown Plaza 08C8XA 8TAEET CLEMWATM FUMA Dare OM05 UNIT FLOOR ?" °?'a°° PLANS CWCKM A533 a S .T? 11 El rr II r iw! u w ®?111141? "` 4000 400 5 },f II+ y? . I„ FZt}r j ?/ 9 a 1 7Y•M'111 .a sLN ?IawJ Li'?h??`'???i .A' ?? 40000 4000 04. .? i f 4 N- f ?? ' Jar.?r + a , , y `? r ? w };ter .- ` r i 3 TT ? f) a? f l J, 40 f ? y rr r 11 rC ? ,? t f \ \ w. fd ` r f fy `y? i? = 4 - AV,I z - 4 1 , i y x C?, f? - a 4 a I I Oi eow- Novo M ? V4 Vim r ,.?I 1~ Emit - -? ?? ?-- rT 7 r ?- Purl ppwr,¦ AUX 1 mom MOV E ® _ ? I . i - 1 rk _ ??r I 1 ® I __ rx rr?r?l I ? KIM t ? ?. Wr ?"? III; ? ?rrf ? ' 71-- I I ? F7 a 1 I l I =tee a all •., New P 4zir ,-'?R _. 1. nP'.. ?Z-- i -, QV4 ?r -.-mss= Von i¦?r - ki m ?? i :"A ='? I I RAM ,?`a X390 p,7it - 1 1fl? ?D E J ' w R I& L i-aviln R3113Yfi1-Ila -u,1H iA''?IIil f'.37?3s5n1 #lI- APII1???? M?il?9 rW ? uA o5 ?'f!t'Ai11lA ?1?aa a.tYm'A!1'?I?il?l i ¦ /mm- slow ? f ®? r di rl . A! i4 I W. 14 Y !n 114 t? IAe -. 1 I _ i It t. VA 1 1. ?A: ... = NI, 11 _ 4N I M ? Ir ? II?A ? 4? ? ISts I A? N ka ' r I ' 1?. A? ,.t N! -.?,;, 111 l ,tee l tr ? '? ?' n'1? ill®1111 L ? 4AtIA/ S4.!1 I11 ?rrr: No rrr, pYYYI?°?'__. mr-IfI3 Man al - d_9 -? -- - ? a- - -- -- '? -- IF i? ?I ljj? -room IMI UL-17- -6i I W_ -- aft 1 not Pa M- Wit u a Tr-?f rr f'T7lT Y ,. ?. ?r "? r7r- _ ?? z s[717 S C C ls? F- 1•t>•?1 I-1 kl)''Lft ?r Ap .• r'rr? ®° rr f ( fir, ? 7r rr _? _ ? _ C rr rr -, 41 -- 77 T" -MEL FF -YV "Joni 1¦ ¦® '?.?. .® I®a f ®® ®, , wwwwr oi I' fillI I-win low ?? 1 1 1 1 1 q-r- ? r r r?-?- rr-r VT TT"7!4-1 M E dli 'IMF, -- -77 -- 1=7-' -- po ow ff i //l` w f 00- OWW WWI ` -t? - - - ,,=v N or* ow-F -41 _ _ - ?ci?1 91 Jr - .• AM' 110 ,.?v r - raw 17 ?x` ?'?, ? ? ? '19 .fir: w? ? I .r ?t? rc??'?c• i t= I .fir ;- f - 1 d? 63 ?? fi 11i - `V JS / 000 " / l - Si r? 00 , Mott00 00 i armer LandDesign urban design planning civil engineering landscape architecture Two Harbour Place Ari Daman,AICP 302 Knights Run Avenue, Suite 110 Tampa, FL 33602 V: 813.275.9276 F: 813.275.9277 adaman@landdesign.com 6wmw--X,? L-Dcc Oblo WC f'?'?,yC<?iiRlllp i?il - 1 - LandDesign. urban design planning civil engineering landscape architecture Two Harbour Place David Taylor, RLA,ASLA 302 Knights Run Avenue, Suite 110 Partner Tampa, FL 33602 V: 813.275.9276 F: 813.275.9277 dtaylor@landdesign.com ?md glwt--M?' Ac6 oai Ahutf 1 oo sl j Ift >w Architects ROBERT K. LEDFORD ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL 100 E. Madison Street Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33602 813.549.1900 813.549.1901 fax e-mail: rledford@fbbarch.com www.fbbarch.com AA0002981 Architects WALTER PESTRAK, AIA ARCHITECT 100 E. Madison Street Suite 100 Tampa, FL. 33602 813.549.1900 813.549.1901 fax wpestrak ® bakerbamiosarchitects.com www.bakerbarriosamhitecis.oom AA0002981