Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
FLD2005-06057; TDR2005-07023
NOTE Prior to the signoff for any permits to construct the Enchantment project, approved under FLD2005- 06057/TDR2005-07023, the mortgage holder for 321 Coronado Drive must consent to the transfer of one dwelling unit to this site, in accordance with Section 4- 1402.1. Mortgage holder: Mary Harvey. See Wayne Wells (parcel tag added 1/28/08 after phone conversation with Mary Harvey). r? a Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) ORIGINAL FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT -- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Enchantment, LLC, a Florida limited liability company MAILING ADDRESS: c/o Mr. Uday Lele, 1900 Gulf Boulevard, Belleair Shore, FL 33786 PHONE NUMBER: 727-458-7635 40, FAX NUMBER: Seawake Motel, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership PROPERTY OWNER(S): owners the 691 S. Gulfview B(Must listed aeFLprov337671stgnature(s)onpages) AGENT NAME: E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP MAILING ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 PHONE NUMBER: (727) 461-1818 CELL NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: (72.7)462-0365 E-MAIL ADDRESS: eda@jpfirm.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard See Exhibit "A" attached. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 Parcel 1: 1.359 acres (59,198.2 sq. ft.) (zoned "T") PARCEL SIZE: Parcel 2: . l0?acr 4 367 sq_- ft _1 (zoned "OS/R" ) (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 90-unit condominium (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) 1 FP r u i?? Y? l i- i r ry DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Exhibit "B" attached. Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in n r umber o p&kip cis, 3decific se, etc h _J - P ANN11 ) & DF' i C,, t S'1C5 I.a..?...,...... G:I I Y Ui a r .... e " __ .... Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES X NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Exhibit "B" for responses to Criteria 1 through 6. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory a r".70"mpacks on adjacent properties. 61 ? 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Exhibit "B" attached for responses to Criteria 1 through 10. Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater a \A' • ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking' in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.' 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Use separate sheets as necessary. Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater as?a? ajble), l a wrr..w ! t r r CvvJ Jr `e I SVCS '?I 0 • ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with I City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Ackn ad a ant of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included provided. Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing bees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): D r 1`?? I -,i f! 1' All dimensions; North arrow, Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; A ?* Location map; A T3 2645 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; PLANNING & OI= r_;r (?tif - All required setbacks; C11 Y OF - All existing and proposed points of access; - All required sight triangles; - Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; - Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater t • ORIGINAL Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)() and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees S' DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: - All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; - Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; - Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; - Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; - Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'%X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approva); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. - -- i 1 tt,,,? AU S PCAWNG & 0::. r'r_ t SVCS CITY CF c_. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater i • ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS -four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 V2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (81% X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs rTraffi. movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. A Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City re resentatives to visit an hotograph the property described i ppI do . 1-1 Signature of property dwrer repre tative E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire Eli Page 6 of 7 - Fle ble DI PLANNING & DE'JE1 I ,. I- lies ?A.4, __. GlT`f ! C! EC. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sword to and subscribed befor me this ,2y day of May A.D. 205 to me and/or by E- n.?, yA?rmGtrr)nC1 TTT, who is personally known NUX XXfttdCX xxXXK 1 koffm 1?m .. I . N ry pu c, My commission expires: MYCOMMISSION# DD041066 EXPIRES September 2, 2005 BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC. Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Seawake Motel, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Parcel No. 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Flexible development application for comprehensive infill redevelopment project, including termination of non-conforming status, Transfers of Development Rights, Comprehensive Landscape Application 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: E. D. Armstrong III, Esquire, of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Seawake Motel, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership Property Owner By: Seven Seas Equities, Inc., a Florida Property Owner corporation, en pal Partner By : yV'" , 2 Property Owner Don L. Seaton, CEO Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS n r the and rs? ne an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this 3 day of ft , personally appeared Don L. Seaton, CEO, of Seven who having been first duly sworn Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed *Seas Equities, Inc., a Florida corporation, General Partner of Seawake Motel, Ltd., a Florida Notary Public My Commission Expires: limited partnership _ LIND.C R. ClJNNINCzHAM =*: r wrv;a7i?5t(;N Ii DD 310910 EXPIRES: JUiy 11, 2008 bonded Thru Notary Puolic Unde writers S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment revievvlftexible development comprehensive infill application 200S.doc La M n i1r7 j? AY e 1 I (At Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater " " " E EXHIBIT "A" Address: Parcel No.: Legal Description: Parcel 1 691 South Gulfview Boulevard 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 ORIGINAL Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19, Block "C", BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 5, as recorded in Plat Book 38, Pages 38 and 39, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Parcel 2 A parcel of land in Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Southeasterly corner of Lot 19 in Block C of BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 5, as recorded in Plat Book 38, Pages 38 and 39 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and run thence North 81°42'21" West, along the seawall line, 60.18 feet to the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 19; thence South 12°40'00" West, along the Southerly extension of the Westerly line of said Lot 19, a distance of 9.98 feet; thence South 54°21'32" East, along the High Water Mark in Clearwater Pass, 65.18 feet; thence North 12°40'00" East, along the Southerly extension of the Easterly line of said Lot 19, a distance of 40.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. #349031 v1 - Enchantment/Ex A Legal 1 t:a 11U3 U rRR D f I PLA NN F ORIGINAL EXHIBIT "B" TO FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ENCHANTMENT, LLC 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Section B. Description of Request The applicant proposes to redevelop the Sea Wake Motel site, located at 691 South Gulfview Boulevard ("Property") with a 90-unit condominium project, Enchantment. The proposed structure is uniquely designed of rounded edges and domes which will be 80 percent covered by glass. This is an upscale project with most units having over 2,000 square feet and each having a private elevator. Enchantment will be a "one of a kind" development on Clearwater Beach. Simultaneously with the filing of this application, the applicant has submitted (i) an application for transfer of development rights (3 units) from 125 Brightwater Drive to the Property; (ii) an application for transfer of development rights (1 unit) from 321 Coronado to the Property; and (iii) an application for transfer of development rights (4 units) from 161 Brightwater Drive to the Property. Specifically, the applicant seeks the following: 1. Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); 2. Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 7 feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to 3 feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2- 803.C; 3. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402; and 17q U? I V, 4. A two-year development order. 0 s; e PUf RIGINAL Section D. Written Submittal Requirements J General Applicability Criteria: q r.? N; j _ [[ Pi-JING I All S ?s v??(? 1) The proposed development of the land will be'rW'? '-" mony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The scale, bulk, coverage and density of the proposed condominium project is in harmony with recently approved developments along Clearwater Beach, including the Sunspree project located immediately to the east of the subject property at 715 South Gulfview, which included approvals of transfers of density and 150' building height. The adjacent parcel to the west is Continental Towers, a condominium, which is 94.7 feet above base flood elevation. Great effort and design articulation was used to "step back" the proposed building from the existing structure by actual setbacks from ranging from 15' to 38' and also by rounding the edges of the proposed building to minimize impacts. Additionally, full landscaping is provided at the interface. This fagade (west) is also articulated with design detail to provide elements of human scale (to reduce scale and mass) along with a large number of window openings to reduce scale. Adjacent parcels located north of the property, across South Gulfview, are a mix of retail uses and timeshare accommodations. The project meets the Design Guidelines set forth in Section VII(C), Design, Scale and Mass of Buildings, of Beach by Design. Please refer to the detailed discussion of this criteria in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No. 10. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Enchantment enhances the distinct character of Clearwater Beach by providing a building that has three view corridors at eye level. This prevents the wall off effect. The center sculpture garden provides a 68 tall opening for view, light and ventilation. The building strongly incorporates diversity of form and scale. This reduces the effect of height and bulk. The extension of Beach Walk, with the 10' wide color sidewalk and palm tree lined walk, is proposed to enhance Gulfview and provide easy pedestrian access on the Beach. Along this extension we have provided many elements of human scale and interest such as the grand steps, the arches and mouldings concealing the garage and the lighted public art display of the sculpture garden. The building (residences) is set back at least 3 times the required setback and then has rounded edges. The building is designed to have a distinctive art nuevo 2 ? 0 ORIGINAL appearance within classical proportions and articulation. It has inviting recesses and focal points. It strives to enhance the beach community and respect its neighbors while at the same time remain distinctive, unique and elegant. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed residential condominium use is likely to have less of an impact on the surrounding neighborhood and public facilities than the existing use of overnight accommodations. As described in Item 4 below, the proposed use will generate significantly less traffic than the existing use. The residential use and reduced trips will likely result in less impacts on the area, such as police response. The existing structure was built in 1973 and may not conform to all of the structural requirements for safety as required by the current building code and Life Safety code. As such, the proposed building will be a safer structure than the existing building. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The applicant has submitted with this application a letter, dated May 11, 2005, prepared by Gulf Coast Consulting, Inc. setting forth a comparison of existing traffic generation by the 110-room resort hotel and the traffic generation of the proposed 90-unit condominium. The proposed use generates 376 daily trips compared to 981 daily trips created by the current use, resulting in a significant decrease in traffic generation. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The Property is located within the "South Beach/Clearwater Pass District" of Clearwater Beach. Beach by Design describes the "Clearwater Pass District" as an area of "strategic revitalization and renovation." High-rise condominiums appear to be the predominant use in this District. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. The superior architectural design of the proposed redevelopment project will visually improve the site which is visible from Clearwater Pass, the Sand Key Bridge and Sand Key Park. The proposed residential use will have significantly less acoustic and olfactory impacts. than the existing motel use. The project meets all building setbacks (with the exception of setbacks to pavement) an owes- not intrude on adjacent parcels. 1 3 --- ?i.{ti v; • . 0 Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment P I AUS1 i 2?5 ; RIGINAL SVCS 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Use. There is no proposed use deviation. The proposed use as a condominium is allowed in the "Tourist" district and is one of the uses suggested in Beach by Design for the Clearwater Pass District. Intensity. The proposed density is in keeping with Code provisions allowing termination of non-conforming status, transfers of density to the site and increased height in this Community Redevelopment District. The existing 110-room Sea Wake motel was built in 1973 prior to current Code regulations and could not be constructed on the site today without termination of non-conformity. As previously discussed the proposed use generates less traffic than the current use. Development Standards. There is no deviation to the setbacks for the structure itself. All requested setback reductions are for sidewalks, paving, trash staging areas and the like, without which it would be impractical to accomplish the intense landscaping treatment and open project design. The project otherwise meets or exceeds many of the City's development criteria, including parking and open space requirements. Proposed parking is 180 spaces, which is well in excess of the 135 spaces required by Code. Open space is 26 percent where 15 percent is required by Code. As for requested access to South Gulfview, there is no other possible access to the site. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The current assessed value of the property, per the Pinellas County tax rolls, is $6,650,000. The applicant estimates that the value of the property after the proposed development will be approximately $150 million. This project seeks to be landmark quality with its program, plans and detailed image. This equates to value perceived on the project and on adjacent properties, i.e., next door to an exceptional project. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Multi-family residential is an allowed use in the "Tourist" zoning district and is one of the uses contemplated in Beach by Design for the Clearwater Pass District. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 4 • 0 ORIGINAL A condominium is one of the uses suggested for the "Clearwater Pass District" in Beach by Design. The proposed use is the same use as the adjacent land uses to the west (Continental Towers condominium) and east (approved Sunspree condominium project). To the south is the Gulf of Mexico and to the north, across South Gulfview, are some mixed retail and overnight accommodation uses. The redevelopment of the property will beautify and improve the property as viewed from all sides, but particularly for those on the north, which will have a view through the atrium to the beach. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. [This criteria was deleted by Code amendment.] 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Please refer to the detailed discussion of the proposed redevelopment project in General Criteria 2 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria 10. Enchantment is a distinctive, unique and elegant project which will enhance the beach community. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project promotes Beach by Design's strategy of revitalization of the south beach. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Termination of Non-conforming Status The applicant seeks termination of non-conforming status, in accordance with Section 6-109 of the Code, to allow the existing 110 motel rooms that exist on the site. Section 6-109 of the Code requires a level two approval to•t non-conforming use or structure with the following requireill I A I:33 .,. ?.... -? , ORIGINAL PLANNING& # R ?.i»Smi 5i r 1. Perimeter buffers con ofrming to the requirements of Section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. There are no perimeter buffers in the "Tourist" district. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in Section 3-1202(D). All parking areas are enclosed. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. All existing structures, lighting and accessories will be removed. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. The proposed landscaping meets or exceeds Code. The applicant will agree to a condition of approval that signs (which are not yet proposed) must meet Code requirements. Height The approval of relief that is sought regarding height is necessary in order to accommodate the units being transferred to the site. See the response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria 10 concerning the discussion of how the project meets the separation requirements for structures exceeding 100 feet in height and the graphic depicting the separation which is included in the plans. Setbacks There is no requested deviation from the setbacks to the building itself. The relief sought from setbacks is with regard to pavement, sidewalks or structures other than buildings and are necessary in order to accomplish the intense landscaping treatment and the open project design. The project otherwise meets or exceeds many development criteria, including parking and open space requirements. Access to an Arterial The property is addressed from South Gulfview and the Sea Wake Motel has always had direct access from South Gulfview. There is no other possible means of access to the property. 6 LJ 0 ORWINAL 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. The proposed project will have 180 parking spaces, where 135 spaces are required by Code. 10. Color The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). The proposed project has been designed in accordance with Beach by Design design guidelines. We provide the following information concerning the color, height, mass and bulk criteria. The color palette and material vocabulary is as follows: Wall finishes: Area A: White Heron - SW2425 Area B: Windfresh White - SW2426 Area C: Estate Tan - SW2039 Area D: Sandstone - SW2009 Roofs: Blue gray stone-look tiles similar to SW2127 Diamond-shaped India sourced grey blue slate Glass: PPG Azuria, aquamarine blue with bone white frames Mouldings: Queen Anne's lace and Paris white details Railings: Curved picketts, charcoal wrought iron color Pavers: Brussels sandstone block Mass Conce U t Ir' i 'f ?? ? is 't All 2`3 L__CITY OF'- A. Sculpture garden and atrium concepts provide view corridors and mass reduction. This element opens from the road to the beach and is accented by a fountain/water feature enhanced by courtyard activity and landscaping. 7 ? ORIGINAL B. The building is formed by two factors, view orientation to the beach, sunrise and sunset, and by offering as wide as possible view corridors to pedestrians and vehicle occupants. The building steps down as it progresses to the west. This stepping and curving greatly reduces the mass. C. The building, especially the podium, is pedestrian friendly and in human scale by the addition of grand steps, arches in the podium, significant setbacks of the building and custom accent gas lights as focal point details. Mass/Bulk Review 1. The face (Gulfview) is in a horizontal plane ratio of 21 % on the residences. This "thinness" is accented by window rhythm, lighter color and rounded form. 2. All parking is concealed and the fagade is articulated in the building theme along with several human scale arches. 3. The building shape and orientation correlate to the Beach Walk extension aspect of the south end of Gulfview. The shape also respects greatly the neighbor building shapes. 4. At least 73% of the facades are covered with architectural accents, windows or decorative railings. 5. The equal length consideration is solved by varied height and length; most vary at 37' and one at 47' (requirement 100' max). Not only does the wall vary but usually terminates at a point of interest or at a visual invitation (to see around a balcony or in a sculpture garden). The atrium is a visual feature and it reduces mass. 6. The maximum building envelope above 45' (max. allowed 60%) is 53% reducing to 20% at the peaks, significantly less mass than allowed by Code. 7. All setbacks for buildings are 15' or 20' on beach. 8. The human scale and aesthetic appeal of street level facades and the relationship to Beach Walk extension was a hallmark of the design concept. It is further enhanced by landscaping and fountains. Tower Separation 1. The project consists of one tower at 150' measured from FEMA. For the 150' portion of the building: a. TDR's are included. t is ryaa ?(? b. No portion of the building structure above 100' is within 100' of any other structure exceeding 100' in height. See diagram indicating 100' to approved project to 8 C 0 ORIGINAL the east. The building to the west (Continental Towers) is 94.7 feet above base flood elevation, as set forth in the attached surveyor's certificate. C. For structures within 500' to the east, we are separated by 100' (100' allowable). Therefore, there are not more than two buildings exceeding 100' in height within 500' of each other (Option "1" in Beach by Design, Section VII, Design Guidelines). d. The floor plates are within three percent of strict compliance with the floor plate guidelines in Section VII, B.3.a and B.3.b, Beach by Design. The deviations requested pursuant to Section VII, B.3.c are justified by the significant tiered and rounded effect of the building, the extraordinary step backs and the central atrium view corridor. The sculptural effect of the building also reduces the mass for this consideration. The building helps create a sense of neighborhood by providing a visual destination point. The landscaping is designed to be lush and inviting. Gas light custom lanterns accent the front and back of the building. The building meets all setback requirements for structure, is pedestrian friendly and designed based on human scale. Street facades, fountain/water features, lighting and landscaping enhance the profile. Note: The architectural plans (Sheet A2.02) depict a private dining club, which is for the exclusive use of the residents and their guests. This area is completely catered on a reservation basis. There is no onsite preparation of food. 8/11/2005 11:57 AM 46069.109803 #346191 v1 - Enchantment/Seawake/Ex to Comp Infill Rl` IT` I 4, ? I"wi7Vf1 C A_y?j -111 .1 C4 QF 9 Engelhardt, Hammer & Aciates Seawake Motel (EnchantmQ Code CrrOtefiq'Analysi. Seawake Motel (Enchantment) Code Criteria Analysis I PLAN' Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates has been retained to evaluate the Flexible S 7- P 13 2GG5 rl,;)r "LEA PWA' Development/Comprehensive Infill Proposal for its compliance with the City of Clearwater Land Development Code, its consistency with Beach by Design standards of development and its compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. The Land Development Code establishes criteria for review of proposals of this level. We have evaluated the proposal relative to those criteria and find the project consistent with the criteria's objectives. General Applicability Criteria 3-913.A 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale bulk, coverage, density, and character of adiacent properties in which it is located. The proposed project of high-rise condominiums is in keeping with the described character of this district. The subject property is located in the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Designation with primary uses in this category being "high density residential/ overnight accommodation." The site is located in the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design. This area is characterized as "mixed-use - high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." Along South Gulfview there are several existing and approved structures of similar height and bulk. The neighbor to the east is the existing high-rise Holiday Inn, recently approved for the Sunspree Condominium Project. This building will include two condominium towers at 150' in height. Neighbors to the north include low to mid-rise retail, restaurant, accommodation and residences. The neighbor to the west is the Continental Towers condominiums, a single tower at 94.7' high. To the south is the Gulf of Mexico. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adiacent land and buildings or significantly impair the vahia fharanf The proposed development will further the goals of redevelopment for the area and increase value of the adjacent properties. The current use of the Page 1 of 8 Engelhardt, Hammer & Aciates Seawake Motel (Enchantr*) Code Criteria Analysis site is the Best Western "Sea Wake" Motel, a 1973 built structure. The proposal provides a chance to upgrade the structural and architectural quality revitalizing the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant estimates the property value to increase to $150 million from the current assessed value of $6.65 million. This increase provides value through proximity for adjacent neighbors. By added improvements, such as the sculpture garden and beach walk extension, as well as through future clientele for adjacent businesses, this increased value will directly benefit the entire surrounding area. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development will improve the quality of life for the neighborhood in terms of health and safety. The improvements proposed will allow for alleviation in traffic congestion, continuity of pedestrian paths along Gulfview and the Beach, and shared amenities in the ground floor landscaping improvements. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. As previously stated, the proposal is designed to ease traffic congestion. A letter submitted by the applicant compared the traffic generation of the existing use with the proposed condominiums. The existing traffic is more than 2%2 times that predicted for the proposed, with 941 daily trips dropping to 376, and 54 PM peak trips dropping to 34. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. This proposal is consistent with the neighborhood character. The character of the neighboring community as defined previously is "mixed- use - high rise condominiums, resort hotels, recreation and tourist and neighborhood serving uses." There are several high rise condominium and overnight accommodation buildings in the nearby vicinity. There is an existing high-rise condominium tower immediately west of the subject property, the Continental Towers. Recent approvals similar to the proposed development in this district include the Sunspree Project, immediately to the east, at 715 South Gulfview Blvd, approved for 149 condominium units at 150' height. The Adam's Mark Project at 430 Page 2 of 8 Engelhardt, Hammer & Aciates Seawake Motel (Enchantno Code Criteria Analysis Gulfview Blvd. is approved for multi-use development, consisting of 78 overnight accommodation units and 112 Condominiums with a maximum 149.5' height. The Decade Gulfcoast at 521 South Gulfview Blvd. is approved as a mixed use development including 241 overnight accommodation units, 38 attached dwellings and accessory retail and restaurant at a maximum height of 128'. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adiacent properties. The design, as demonstrated by the architectural exhibits submitted, has been created with particular attention to details. There are three eye level view corridors proposed as well as a 68' tall opening to maximize views of the Gulf, light and ventilation as well as prevent the walled off effect of high-rise developments. Condominiums are consistent with the current uses in the area ensuring a similar pattern of use and time of operation. Comprehensive Infill Criteria 2-803.C 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise economically impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The redevelopment proposal is actually less intense than the existing hotel in terms of traffic congestion and open space (26 % versus 15% currently). There are no deviations requested in terms of setbacks for the building. The reductions in setbacks allow for the proposed 10' wide color sidewalk fulfilling the Beach by Design desire to extend the beach walk along the entire length of Gulfview Blvd. Increases in height are within the parameters of the transfer in development rights requirements (see further discussion on height in the TDR Code Criteria section). Gulfview Blvd. is the only available option for site access. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The proposed project will add value to the entire surrounding area. See General Applicability Criteria 2 for discussion on value. Page 3 of 8 Engelhardt, Hammer & Afkiates Seawake Motel (Enchantno Code Criteria Analysis 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The City of Clearwater Land Use Category and Zoning District encourage these types of high-density residential condominiums and resort facilities in their definitions for the HDR and T districts. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect are compatible with adjacent land uses; The design is representative of the type of uses that are already seen in this district as well as the uses desired in the Beach by Design analysis and the Future Land Use Plan. The project proposal fits well within the mix of uses already established. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal will add value to the vicinity through extending the beach walk, creating off street parking, adding shared ground level improvements and landscaping and removing non-conforming signs and lighting for an improved appearance. 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposal is a unique architectural addition to the Clearwater Pass District. Rounded structural elements, a 68' arched opening, landscaping and sculpture as well as water features provide for a vivacious atmosphere and dramatic improvement over the typical block high-rises that Beach by Design aims to eliminate. Quality in design and pedestrian considerations will enhance the entire experience for this end of Clearwater Beach. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are iustified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole Page 4 of 8 Engelhardt, Hammer & Aoiates Seawake Motel (Enchantmo Code Criteria Analysis Flexibility in the design is justified by the benefit the new design will bring to the community. The proposal offers the opportunity to not just upgrade the existing hotel facility, but create a new structure consistent with the design parameters preferred in Beach by Design. The impact of the increased height is minimized through the tiered design and pedestrian level considerations, including a sculpture garden, fountains, gas accent lighting and landscaping. The setback flexibility allows for the 10' wide color sidewalk through the site. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There is more than the required parking by code proposed with the new development. 180 parking spaces are provided where only 135 are required by code. By increasing the number of parking spaces and locating them internally on the bottom floors of the building, the developer proposes to lighten traffic congestion caused by back-ups from parking constraints. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The design complies with the tourist district flexible use section 2-803 with the transfer of development rights. The proposed building height of 150' is within the 1.5 multiplier of 100', as defined by sections 2-803 and 4-1403 and described in Beach by Design's design guidelines. Termination of Non-conforming status 6-109 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of section 3-1202(C) shall be installed. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards established in section 3-1202(D). The parking is all internal to the structure and thus is not required to include landscaping. Page 5 of 8 Engelhardt, Hammer & Asoiates Seawake Motel (Enchantmo Code Criteria Analysis 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. The developer will comply with all signage requirements in the site design process. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Not applicable. Transfer of Development Rights 4-1403.A 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; The redevelopment of the parcel will increase the value of this site and neighboring parcels. See response to General Applicability item 2. 2. The uses within the proiect are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater, High rise condominiums are allowed uses in Clearwater and the Tourist District. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the proiect are compatible with adjacent land uses; As previously discussed, the proposed project is consistent with the adjacent uses and approved future uses in the area. There are existing high rise condominiums on the adjacent site to the west and the future Sunspree high rise condominiums to the east. Across Gulfview to the north are motel, restaurant, retail and residences of the character typical of a resort area. The proposed uses compliment the existing neighborhood uses through shared amenities and mutual support. The Board Walk and beach uses in the area are further enhanced by the continuity in design and function the proposal demonstrates. 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and See General Applicability Criteria response 2. 5. The design of the proposed proiect creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Page 6of8 Engelhardt, Hammer & Aseiates Seawake Motel (Enchantmo Code Criteria Analysis See General Applicability Criteria response 2 and Comprehensive Infill Criteria Response 6. Transfer of Development Rights 4-1403.C 1. The sending site and the receiving site must be located within the city. All sending sites and the subject property are within the boundaries of Clearwater. 2. No building which exceeds 100 feet in height shall be located within 100 feet of any other building which exceeds 100 feet in height. No more than two buildings which exceed 100 feet in height shall be located within 500 feet of any building which exceeds 100 feet in height; and The proposal meets this height spacing requirement. The Continental Towers to the west does not exceed 100' in height. Of the two future Sunspree towers to the east, only one is within the 500' distance, insuring that not more than two buildings over 100' are within 500'. The reductions in floor plate above 100' provides for the minimum 100' spacing from the nearest building above 100' tall. 3. Appropriate view corridors are incorporated in the design of the parcel proposed for development and all design standards in Article 3 Division 5 are otherwise satisfied, and The buildings are stepped to allow interruption of massing and view. Pedestrian level improvements of lighting and artistic features have been designed with care to create visual excitement at ground level. The proposal encompasses deviations from floor plate requirements as allowed under 3.c of the Height Standards described in Beach by Design when the "mass and scale of the design creates a tiered effect and complies with the maximum building envelop allowance above 45'." The structures step back substantially as the building goes up. The tiers permit only 53% of the building envelope above 45', compliant with the 60% maximum, and then step back to 20% at the peaks. A minimum of 73% of all facades are designed with architectural accents, windows or decorative railings. The design of the building provides a great variety of Page 7of8 Engelhardt, Hammer & AlItiates Seawake Motel (Enchantmo Code Criteria Analysis dimensions, tiers and detail work complying with section 2 of the design, scale and mass of Beach by Design guidelines. 4. There shall be a reasonable relationship between the number of units transferred and anv increases in building height. Compatibility with the surrounding area and feasibility of the project shall be considered when approving any increase in height. The units transferred offer a reasonable relationship to the requested deviation in height limits. See General Applicability Criteria responses 1 & 5 for discussion of height and mass in the vicinity of the proposed development. Conclusion: In summary, it is our professional opinion that the proposed project is in conformity with the City of Clearwater's land development regulations, is consistent with the Beach by Design guidelines, and will provide a positive benefit to the surrounding Clearwater Beach Community. Page 8 of 8 ORIGINAL Tree Inventory Best Western As required by the City of Clearwater,) have completed an assessment of all trees (8" dbh or greater) on the subject site and within 25' beyond the property lines. My opinion is set forth below as to the viability (rating of 1-5) and any potential hazards of these trees. # Tree Size & Species Rating and other pertinent comments 1 14" Phoenix Dact lifera 4 2 .14" Phoenix Dactylifera 4 3 15" Washintonia palm 4 4 12" Queen Palm 3 5 11" Queen Palm 3 6 12" Queen Palm 3 7 8" Sabal Palm 3 8 10" Sabal Palm 3 9 12" Washingtonia Palm 4 10 13" Washingtonia Palm 4 11 15" Washingtonia Palm 4 12 13" Washingtonia Palm 4 13 13" Washingtonia Palm 4 14 12" Washingtonia Palm 3 15 12" Washingtonia Palm 3 16 15" Washingtonia Palm 4 17 14" Washingtonia Palm 4 18 9" Sabal Palm 3 19 9" Sabal Palm 3 20 12" Sabal Palm 4 21 11" Sabal Palm 3 22 10" Sabal Palm 3 23 10" Sabal Palm 3 24 9" Sabal Palm 3 25 14" Sabal Palm 4 26 15" Sabal Palm 4 27 16" Sabal Palm 4 28 8" Sabal Palm 3 111111 A. ? 1-? 1 29 17" Sabal Palm 4 UU1 30 15" Sabal Palm 4 i Ps 31 14" Sabal Palm 4 32 12" King Sago 3 j j'J 4y • ORIGINAL 33 8" Sabal Palm 3 34 9" Sabal Palm 3 35 12" Sabal Palm 3 36 13" Sabal Palm 3 37 11" Sabal Palm 3 38 11" Sabal Palm 3 39 12" Sabal Palm 3 40 11" Sabal Palm 3 41 11" Sabal Palm 3 42 10" Sabal Palm 3 43 10" Sabal Palm 3 44 12" Sabal Palm 3 45 11" Sabal Palm 3 46 15" Sabal Palm 3 47 13" Sabal Palm 3 48 13" Sabal Palm 3 49 12" Sabal Palm 3 50 12" Sabal Palm 3 51 13" Sabal Palm 3 52 13" Canary Cross Palm 3 53 12" Sabal Palm 3 54 11" Sabal Palm 3 55 11" Sabal Palm 3 56 13" Sabal Palm 3 57 12" Sabal Palm 3 58 13" Sabal Palm 3 59 12" Sabal Palm 3 60 12" Canary Cross Palm 3 61 13" Sabal Palm 3 62 12" Sabal Palm 3 63 12" Sabal Palm 3 64 12" Sabal Palm 3 65 10" Sabal Palm 3 66 9" Sabal Palm 3 67 8" Sabal Palm 3 68 8" Sabal Palm 3 69 11" Sabal Palm 3 70 8" Sabal Palm 3 r- . 71 8" Sabal Palm 3 72 8" Sabal Palm 3 73 8" Oleander 3 74 11" Sabal Palm -j I 3 '"" 75 12" Sabal Palm 3 76 8", 8" Ligustrum :. 3 CAF 77 11" Sabal Palm 3?' ` • '0 ORIGINAL 78 11" Sabal Palm 3 79 11" Sabal Palm 3 80 10" Washin tonia Palm 3 81 1S" Phoenix Dactylifera 3 82 10" Washin tonia Palm 3 83 11" Sabal Palm 3 84 12" Sabal Palm 3 85 8" Washingtonia Palm 3 86 9" Washingtonia Palm 3 87 15" Phoenix Dactylifera 4 88 11" Sabal Palm 3 89 11" Sabal Palm 3 90 8"Queen Palm 3 91 15" Washingtonia Palm 4 92 14" Queen Palm 3 93 12" Queen Palm 3 94 12" Queen Palm 3 I affirm that my opinions have been made in good faith, with no coercion from others. I further affirm that I have no interest with the parties or people involved with neither this issue nor any interest with regard to the outcome. Sincerely, Chuck Butler, Certified Arborist, Certificate #FL-1235A Butler's Nursery, Inc. 701175 th Street North Pinellas Park, Florida 33781 (727) 544-0445 - phone, (727) 541-5027 - fax PLANNING & OF 02/10/2005 14:56 7275621 PUBLIC UTILITIEo FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT LOCATION: 691 SO GULFVEEW DATE OF TEST: 8/14/05 STATIC: 63 PSI RESIDUAL: 43 PSI P ITOT: 44 PSI FLOW 1125 GPM MISC: A.TTN'"NORTHSIDEENGMFERYNGFAX#446-8036 PAGE 02 Clearwater c.? ORIGINAL PLANNING 8 DE `M_- _ -? !.)"JCS ...._.,._ CITY IF CI,.I ,.aRVL-i.. : 08/10/2005 14:56 7275621 LOCATION: 691 SO GU.LFVIEW PUBLIC UTILITIE? FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT PAGE 02 Clearwater ORIGINAL DATE OF TEST: 8/14/o5 STATIC: 63 PSI RESIDUAL: 43 PSI P ITOT: 44 PSI PLOW: 11.25 GPM MISC: AWN"NORTHS)DE ENGNEERTNO FAX# 446-8036 tFt ;. ; A U!"33 j PLANN^1N,G & DE VE0,,;,,; 01 vcsj ? - WT??r? GlS C?1AfAT 'h 0$/10/2005 14:56 727562 PUBLIC UTILITIEO FLOW TEST CITY OF CLEARWATER WATER DEPARTMENT LOCATION: 69.1 SO GULFVEEW DATE OF TEST: 8/10/05 STATIC: 63' PSI RESIDUAL: 43 PSI PITOT: 44 PSI FLOW: 11.25 GPM MISC: ,ATTN':N0RTHS)9)E ENGINEERING FAX# 446-5036 PAGE 02 Clearwater c.? ORIGINAL u? r PLANNING c DEV LCr;.,;I (SVGS fiamiLa Gulf Coast nsulting, Inc. 0 o Land Development Consulting .Engineering .Planning.Transportation .Permitting ICOT Center 13825 ICOT Boulevard, Suite 605 Clearwater, FL 33760 Phone: (727) 524-1818 Fax: (727) 524-6090 May 11, 2005 Mr. Bennett Elbo, Traffic Engineer City of Clearwatr 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Best Western Redevelopment - 691 S. Gulfview Boulevard Request for TIS Waiver Dear Mr. Elbo: Per our discussions, we are submitting documentation demonstrating the redevelopment of this 110 room resort hotel into a 90 unit high-rise condominium would not result in significant traffic impacts and therefore a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) should not be necessary. A comparison of existing and proposed traffic generation using ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition is shown below: Existing Use ITE LUC Daily AM Peak PM Peak 110 Room Resort Hotel 330 981 41 54 Proposed Use ITE LUC Daily AM Peak PM Peak 90 High-Rise Condominiums 232 376 31 34 As shown, the proposed redevelopment would have less traffic generation than the existing use, therefore a detailed TIS Waiver is appropriate. This will be noted on the application. Sincerel , i Robert Pergolizzi, AICP Principal RP:al cc: Uday Lele, Aquasun Developments, LLC Ed Hooper, The Consus Group File 05-042 E • SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PINELLAS ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared CURTIS N. FRIED, Professional Land Surveyor No. 4537, who [is personally known to me] [has produced as identification] and who, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that: 1. He is a surveyor for Suncoast Land Surveying, Inc., which prepared the survey (Project No. 5031.04) of the Seawake Motel property located at 691 South Gulfview ("Property"). 2. The parcel adjoining the westerly boundary of the Property is the Continental Towers condominium property located at 675 South Gulfview ("Continental Towers Property"). 3. The height of the building located on the Continental Towers Property is 94.7 feet above base flood elevation. 4. This Affidavit is made with full understanding of all laws appertaining to affidavits in Florida, and full faith and credit may be given hereto. The undersigned further certifies that the undersigned has read the complete text of this Affidavit and fully understands its contents. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT. F I C,f 0 145-57 CURtt& ®-T P.L.S. No. 45%.rf $' (Seal) ?{ f? SWORN TO, subscribed and acknowledged before me this Z 'day of June, 2005. CRYSTAL LUNTSFORD co+?ussioN • OD983007 ? PUBW ? D(PMtES AN 10 2009 FLOR04 80 NM t? oucH RU HSU ANa COMPANY #349313 v1 Nota Public A DA s- -\ Print name: k- My commission expires: p Lf 105 L? V L? Al 0 1 2055 D O C, .1 P! 00 Ln ti 0 M .?D o ?Ei Ci U O I ? o / C Cm N E 42-STiY!y ? aRG F.37IXai•,.+?.T +w Cf) 0 O / U 0 L N LO O O O n O LO O O N x Vq • ORIGINAL SoU r`?' ?fin CULL '? .47•.'11Y:. Lam. Y 'Tl o-7 O?,LL ?jAR? ?F? X15 MOW" QB?R . Ati?l tis 1 can aG j t1 S 16 '0 T?7 lcodMousure 09 W ?t \ LOW •'' Lft,. I \ a Q i s 1 I I ?? / ?D I I I \I 1 a I l • '' wft, •'' ! ZOAM a \ / ? rP? PARCEL I \ICq T IMAC \ \ \ ,d • !,d !,d f ?Or Ar. / Cu "amain; cAEs \ OF \ cj. to \ ? ?? / 32 5PACES ?I I? 4 40 a L4 11 I.M J i X-4? "1 +?y ......?..?..............?..?......... ..........? ?..?.. ?..?.. ?..?.. ?..?.. ?...rt.... ......................_.. _.. ?...! i s 4L ?I/.Arl?1???1 rl 0 O 70 0 O rD 1 r "' CLEARWATER PASS -° .. _.???ies??`*1i?? ' :.: iii:' C 4CHANTMENIO ORIGINAI V?r AU j 1 1 PLAr?r s cJr U, Li Till, ENCHANTMENT, LLC ? i21GINAL highly articulated and carefully proportioned to reduce mass, bulk, and } enhance scale. Architectural proportion and vocabulary intensely explored to create memorable resort with lightness and elegance. Richly patterned moldings, bands and wrought iron details made dramatic at night with accent lighting. r .! ?? 1 S Z???,i ? ? 1 c-I t C. a smdw%w CD Iq?1 anFLM ?ur+rr 1" = 20 Gillett Associates ARDi} 6A0 oP A?i?wa• s®..1a.?.laam 15{11017 Ss ? 9?41957?? 941-957- 151 Fa dodr<om F-4 w? z w ¦ • ow1,w >tses ?oe1a r . re maw N MS A1.01 Q 5UILDING AREA T45ULATI0 15 SPACES UNITS ENCLOSED BLDG AREA (SF) GROSS PARKING LEVEL 1 90 0 41,432 PARKING LEVEL 2 57 0 32,561 PARKING LEVEL 3 33 4 25,825 TYPICAL LEVEL 4 9 21,169 TYPICAL LEVEL 5 S 21,169 TYPICAL LEVEL 6 8 21,169 TYPICAL LEVEL 1 8 21,169 TYPICAL LEVEL 8 9 24,520 TYPICAL LEVEL S S 24,520 TYPICAL LEVEL 10 9 24,520 TYPICAL LEVEL 11 1 20,111 TYPICAL LEVEL 12 5 14,305 TYPICAL LEVEL 13 5 14,305 TYPICAL LEVEL 14 5 14,305 TYPICAL LEVEL 15 2 14,305 TYPICAL LEVEL 16 I 4,060 i }-- TOTAL BUILDING RESIDENTIAL UNITS : W UNITS TOTAL ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA: - -R CONDO PARKM: 180 SPACES (INCLUDING 6 HC) s 1 `' IFIR CD 7D h I t- - n j oil! r • • : v VIM AM* son CD 1411 ROM V/ MN l 111 = 20' n$SOC11irs rAD7 GROUP COITOIATID SmYllfodlludm 15111012M Sm %t?A574151 P- H W? U W ¦ ra ali f 1110 110 1t?I A2.01 I Gillet Associsus AADT OAOUP Sasu.eG.N.lmda 1541101 Tad S 23 S 2'1 4 ansa 34 6 941-957-4477 941-957-4151 P6 z c U G? w a? NO" IF, SW4r ?9? RjM PI.?W '?•• "?' r . A2.02 nu 204 I • l..J r Giltca Associaoes ARD:= 6RODP Aulu.cnrce,- .PJ qg mS.og t PR' 3" 94tA5T44T7 941-4574151 R. z 3 z a ¦ DAIS AMWMF? a & .ta f >{L • RIB Rim NM 110111 r A2 03 1I7 Zflt . W& il tm ABD« 6AOOP am.•?aa.am 154-3 M 2W S- Smoe, Plonla 3276 943A57-4{71 941A57?151 Aa W Mir CD ? OqO? ?f 11M1 ?Olai t . ?2r ISM Rid ? N ... A2.04 ? ? ?, t t ^ t _ ar Gillett Associates ARDA M? UP As ramm•Pl?noi? g ! 1543-1012ed S- S d& 34 6 --k Eq 23 941-957•µn 941-M-4151 Pn E--4 Tor CD G-) z w ¦ Rom ?? ?, A2.05 a'S6- i 'Ti a _ =.! n -_ J two M49 mip ?0 70 Kim .?.. a 1" = 10' 21 Gillen 1lssoaztes ARD?} OYgO.D.wP,,.. AerA«....... ? PLnomg Sinnu?YWH.arlm 1549-IM 2nd SWw z w? z w ...,.. Mi " A2.06 r. l?r ?.3 ?•"_4` w9r a r.. 1 twl 3w v t 1 ' IW 4 700 GF iml 70090: ,.. "" .,, ?.. ° I t< ? ? wow 1 `? L 1f "wow MT2 rib o I LJ 2M i r ; 1 _ V ? Gillett Assodaus ARDT GROUP Air?•P3momg ssm•lar•1? 15531012.d Sum =? .% pld? 3{236 . 941-9574151 Fu z W ?swr er ? ? ; on" r. law ?--_--- '-- >r arcs R 'rr` n 1n?1 as u IW3 ?/ '"` in, A2.07 It ARD Associa OYOUPtes ARDT coaroawtao A¢hmecm¢aPLnmog ssos•1f.Y•7udm 1511301 ?d Sate[ Sanaoeti Florida 31216 941-951-44T/ 941AS/-{757 F¢ •aAlll aeltllyt W v z G, w a >? .o.. Rim •°•••?• A2.08 s r- 2mO r` WTI muff r tw3 299 V .r. .," w f ,ur w i -? am 410.00 vm Ift 19 ! Q mww itrr}_ ?- , omm am mft? CT) I - am 1 -? WW4 2m OF 3neP ML am Rim c tttc Associzms ARDT 6ROUP r ?suam am sm? 947-95 -41SI Pn z E? R UN I w m =a "a mi. any. n.. nos A2.Q9 t? f 3 T: CGtiecc Assodaoes TRD?? ORODP SYmN61i?ImMY 1543-1012ed S- 941-M-4131 P. w.-'?7 U ..? w Phi .... ?. Ram 1"T 10, 1 A2.10 I y. a ?i1UGLLa9330171bCS JT GROUP covoaw: ao Atchi¢cmR•PLonin g 1519-IOt lad 9mrei Swa P?ud o y 342,d 9 4 t? ? 441A57i151 Paa aaa?w.aal?? i ffi? L w z ? a y? lead ? . fY.r aMS 1 ? Y Mr aa?na? 1;,'__ lo' A2.11 ? ?!IZi iJ ,15 SP a Gillett 1lssociatec MUD Olt? UP Au?ma .4b ? = 1513-101Tndsm S.dom, Plnu& 31736 941-9574477 941-957.4151 Pa .Mr1.lw z C 77 G-) DATE O ¦OY _ >lO um go Jh r u? r.r A2.12 lot = In$ c f 7 a Gillett Associaroes ARDT OAO UP Atchimcmie•PLm v 10l d& 342 S 6 3 m, %1-9574M 941-9574151 Pa z iD z w t?> i ¦ w? .... Rj= ? ?s iwawr s ...? ...? •? n, A2.13 DLDG. MATER1AL.4 LEGEND: w:am?i?a` MOIM,tilrl .wr. r?.gAM Mme. M.Oi.1.M/?irMO.OI?Q M.?/C.?1q?m1?l/M1.?..M?I+ ?IPt1M? n•m..rwa?..a?es,r.w M•owo,?,n,rraa M•ssrr.ww?uwsr alb M.1gGI?tOt?.O?11lOLN M. /Yiw11?r..?Olllll\I .YrIL?r< Mr[Y'M?YY,Y?I.YMY N. ARi •.? r f ?.il?Pllw?10 nn, Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP I? C O i I O l AgT?6?.0.r. Anc6utcwte • .'..'.."Ti SpWU•lbd •ILbdcC 1543'101 d& 34236 S.aso 1-PbriAa 94957-4477 441-957151 P. T- ---m"s- F 4 i i. ` ?1 F ELEVATION lCAtE M i$Tv 120' ._--_---__- _1lBBP1EN1?. r + a< ---------- s z z E?f"'1 ? U ?" , Gs1 4 F ? W U U? z w 0 DATE: AUWST 9, 2MS fig} Co tight 2005 SCA1-F: • 20'-0' }RDAT MXVMOtt SHEET NUMBER; A3.01 BLDG. MATERMIS I.BOPM H.tAY1N/PtW Mia1Y?Yl .YmMYI N.i6?111?1!'MlV N•lllM6v??iiYY _ ?il `- e-swa2rr ?--71A'fJtr7?11& ••gYi?aY1 M, .+•#?YMYMPW?Iq.Nw10?N/V n•a?01e6w1YM4Al1YAl1?MJIJi> N•®YfIp1.M,IM.n1.w?IrI1M. ?M Ibi.MOaiwf •??4r6111d M1lblli.MT sNrw .owrneaanw •wawwaw?aaam ?.+•? .wnwwenYrr? na. ?oNau? p GilletAssod-tes l ARD1} OROUY <ao AJChi6eaute • Plaaotog Sva•6Groi•Z.cdan . 7553-1012.4 Suss 5*mM Flo" 34236 l 941-957447'7 941-9574(51 F. ? • •na 1 2 ? s ----- ---- t ._-_ _--- a - t ------ --- l _-- - 3 - -1iT6lA _ t - _ _ ._-_ W -_.-l?Ll? 1 __-_ __. ibD.] , _ e ._-_ - _ -__IOL-k- ; ry C ------ - - --- , ---- t _? - K v ?-- { ELEVATION MtkvX --?._ - _ 6CAE N R6Ef, 1" = 20' H a Z TR' U ? ^z? W W ? U F T l y?j i Vz w ¦ DATE: AUG= 9. ZM5 © C.Py o , 2006 SCALE: Y . 20•-0' sm Ei89?T10N SHEET "BER, A3.02 BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: M•i?m111.FM1wta404i• M YY.A151 N•.Mi?.reYa.YMl.l.l?i/ M.o•?OIa•.YIi1N?0Ya.Y. J.??MCV.i?YQ ?1?• O??O?w?f • • l•.?Y - -••?-4?OFrMierw??Y M.®YCAYrr .•..rs,..wun.www M.®..Anwim?r?.su «.+eos.w•.w..+aor.? nn, Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Axthitcctue' P14miag sm.w•ff i•Imdon 1543101 god So:ext S. o4., Mm& 34236 941-9574477 941-957-4151 Fa i --nukg- 6?--, c Q , i i 1 } -! 1 i ---- ---mod 73 z E"! ? x s x F U d w ? UZ t z w ¦ DAZE: AUGUR 9, 2006 Q Ccpyrl051 2005 SCALE: 1' . 20'-0' Em AMAZON SNEET NUMBER: A3.03 BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: «.wronrw.wanar.rv 82E. .uY xan «. +us .i.n w.? ? ? v srs irrn e avs?. ?T10111,(J? JJ s?.all®tilowYrnrvwl«eirr rev. M.ewa M.arlswNeriro.?warF u.awes.r.r?uOSas«?se+?er u.r..?wrisoor.a.?ens.?sr trveresv M•w..sA.n?srerw- w.owsnrowRimwisewew.u. M.YI.. ,r M•(toT....I1?.YY?1 «.,was?sawreoaw? ?w.:arsAS.wtee.r.?n l? !« u:e t. I a : -___ ___1LEFL?} y2 e --- ' ` ----- ---mac - -t Ja- ----i [? -- ELEVATION wwxcacaea< WALE NW7: 111=20' -MVIM -t - nm Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Atrbiacnce • PlmneB Srna.•l6rei •Ioodm '543-101 2.d S.- 3 4236 941-957-4477 941-957.4151 F. d O ?s ?.r z m U W Z ? ¦ DATE. AUGUST 9, MK © Cowight sons SCALE: V . 20'.0• sme E "AMON SHEET NUMBER: A3.04 aim 24- -um-10- ± '1 U u GLASS AREA RATIO - EAST i w win', m w' , 41-` GLASS AREA RATIO - WEST CD GLASS AREA RATIO - NORTH ?.a GLASS AREA RATIO - SOUTH CD 0 0 ORIGINAL PARKING LEVELS 2- u 05 LEVEL 12 LEVELS 14-5 *04 DOUNTMENT 5EPARATION 5TUDY I y wa S ; i I.JdJ I G`..-J (y 1 0 • ENCHANTMENT, LLC 691 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-06057 - 691 S. Gulfview Boulevard COLOR PALETTE White Heron TINT SW2425 ORIGINAL Windfresh White TWT SW2426 ISOMETRIC - NORTH r- ? 0 O r- ISOMETRIC - NORTHEAST '' ?- 1 Cam') CD 1-0 0 ISOMETRIC - SOUTH 0 17 3 r. i 9 CD r? • Q v / lZ ISOMETRIC - SOUTHWEST ?Y I as U 6 Aa. ? N ? a a O O 4 C H? t., ,. 1,3 TUMANI eniUlelfr e... PAT. MICA FORM MI )LORIDA P.. efwfl• D.•A afAC.vL7 anc.a7Ai ? Twd. Ln Prin. VAUJ.n. R.U-4 V.. ACV AR, 3$21 PArf 800 4A rn U1 WArrmr .rwrl Amity, IAr Irrn `parry" fAwlt f A IAr Arfn, pr re+ rr?r iwlnh Aa R I G I N A fwKNMr, nwd /.r nrrl?w. o/ IAr fprrrla. pnrfi.. i.. hr.vfa; IAe n a/ IAr .i+l Inr wrrweA?fr fhn!! (w<furir IAr p7am awA fAr plain/ IAr fin?afnr; fAr ", a/ nnA ,rw rr nf rw rl(,rAAnr; w.,,f.:/u.rf. IA<rrrm ^nof.".hag a<fwdfalifhr n.Ar. Arrein Arm,;MA grw.a.r fAa+.w. Made this 26th day of June .ri. D. 19 72 Nettuern DENNIS P. THOMPSON, Trustee, and GERALDINE H. THOMPSON, his wife, and JAMES A. BAXTER, Trustee, and GEORGINE D. BAXTER, his wifi , of the County or Pinellas and State of Florida party of the rst part, and SeaWake Motel Ltd., a Florida limited. partner- sh.p with its principal place of business at 691 South Gulf View Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida, 33515 7 of tha County of Pinellas and State of Florida party of the second part, ifitPS13Pf4, that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the Bum Of Ten Dollars and other valuable considerations ---- ZWlCW4r40 him°in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargain- ed, sold and transferred, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and transfer unto the said party of the second part all that certain parcel of land lying and being in the County of Pinellas , and State of Florida, more particularly described as follows: Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19, Block "C" of BAXSIDE SUBDIVISION No. 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 38, Pages 38 and 39, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Y Y X A ale u y? d ?a w ? ( ..l PQ X 14' N. Subject to restrictions, easements and reservations of record, as well as?_ tAxxes for 1972 fand subsequent years. U L U U' ? Ig;f--: U r r.,,3 F . - . U 3 1 ? 2. tom/ ? ^ ? `, e(nget4pr with all the tenenaents, hereditaiminti'and appurtenances, with eveiy prtvilefe, right, title, interest, and estate, dower and right of dower, reversion, remainder and easement thereto belonfine or in anywise appertaininf: i933 FaUt 1110 ft l 3401b the same in fee simple forever. Witur s 194Preof, the said party of the first part has hereunto set Mex 7a oealfthe day and year above written. Sealed and Delivered in Our Presence: ITS l OBAXiE"z .GEO RGIN T L F a Q M D z G a Z z 6 +> ap E ? o S rA 2 J ? tr... RIGINAL .tale of Nlor6a f (90 of PINEL7XS 3terthg Qlrrttfg That on this 26th day of June .4. D.-,1972, before: me personally appeared DENNIS P. THOMPSON and GERALDINE H. THOMPSON, his wife, and JAMES A. BAXTER and GEORGINE D. BAXTER, histwife, to me known to be the person. s described in and tcho executed the foregfoins con- veyaiiceto SeaWake Motel Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, and severally acknowledbed the execution thereof to be theirfree act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. WttnrBB my signature and official seal at Clearwater in the County of' Pinellas and State of Florida, the day and year last aforesaid. My Commission Expires N ry Public 1V ;.:." .. Notary Public, State of FKoelk,i,}'Lt2}ti; My comminton ezplret;Aie to b _; 3r?4y . Bonded by Aetna Life&,Ciaa iENTARY ': DS'TATE..o? .I=LORlr7l O tiMENTARY STAMP;?I `tk ? F.RE E f?-11'01.. ?j ::,..._ - ?y..?-.-OEP.•f0 Y HUE' ???i:,r.,. t.:i? F? . ark iasas`...,r• ?l'1 I ?I i A 5 O ?J a 9Q L? N G O "aS ?{ d O? ? I O ai DIY A 4* r ?A PLANNING & pE if SVGS 'j r- rCe, i G. ?eect 1'#: 2005238283 BK: 14392 PG 24, 06/20/2005 at 02:41 PM, &ORDING 2 PAGES $18.50 D DOC STAMP COLLECTION $52.50 KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT PINELLAS COUNTY, FL BY DEPUTY CLERK: CLKDU04 ORIGINAL This Instrument Prepared By and Return to: R. Carlton Ward (ds), Esquire Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pratesi & Ward, P.A. 1253 Park Street Clearwater, Florida 33756 D uu LSD PLAtVP N(34 8a F)F .:. i QUIT CLAIM DEED QTY a1= c., Wherever used herein, the term "parties" shall include the heirs, personal representatives, successors and/or assigns of the respective parties hereto; the use of the singulai tibi bershall include the plural, and the plural the singular; the use of any gender shall include all genders; and, if used, the term "note" shall itictutle. a}1. the notes herein described if more than one. C. L?v3 ? I u Made-thi§ 20th day of May, 2005, between FIELD HOTEL CORPORATION, a dissolved Pennsylvania Corporation, party of the first part, whose address is 251 W. DeKalb Pike, King of Prussia, PA 19406 an §E9 WAKE MOTEL, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, of the County of Pinellas, State of Florida;, party of the second part, whose address is 691 S. Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33767. -.-WITNESSETH, that the said parties of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and 4/ 160i Dollars ($10.00), in hand paid by the said parties of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby ao?vledged, has remised, released and quit claimed, and by these presents does remise, release and quitclaim unto the said parties of the second part all of the right, title, interest claim and demand which the said parties of the first part has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pinellas, State of Florida, to wit: A parcel of land in Section 17, Township 29 South, Range 15 East, Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Southeasterly comer of Lot 19 in Block C of BAYSIDE SUBDIVISION NO. 5, as recorded in Plat Book 38, pages 38 and 39 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and run thence North 81°42'21" West, along the seawall line, 60.18 feet to the Southwesterly comer of said Lot 19; thence South 12°40'00" West, along the Southerly extension of the Westerly line of said Lot 19, a distance of 9.98 feet; thence South 54°21'32" East, along the High Water Mark in Clearwater Pass, 65.18 feet; thence North 12°40'00" East, along the Southerly extension of the Easterly line of said Lot 19, a distance of 40.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. THIS PROPERTY IS NOT THE HOMESTEAD OF THE PARTY OF THE FIRST PART AS DEFINED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NO. 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said parties of the second part. PINEILAS COUNTY FL OFF. REC. 0 14392 PG 2325 • IN WITNESS WHERE0F,,t1tt said party of the first pan has hereunto set her hand and seal the day and year first above written. WITNESSES. FIELD HO CORPORATION, a dissolved Pennsylvania corporatio} c.: By: C- Sigmatu f f Witness Martin W. Field, President .t/A ?y 9 NN ;' Print Name of Witness: ORIGINAL Signature of Witness _-De-bra ?h to s k? . Print Name of Wiin0'1ss STATE "O PENNSYLVANIA 'The foregoing was acknowledged before me this 7D day of A , 2005 by Martin W. Field as President of FIELD HOTEL CORPORATION, a dissolved Pennsy aria corporation, on behalf of corporation, who is personally known to me or who has produced Dt ?i9 Qr,?-f /?,,,s?as identification. zg?? ?- Notary Public My Commission Expires: NOTARIAL SEAL, EW TOPHER 0. POLITYKA, NOTARY PURM ER MERION TWP. MONTGOMERY CO. OMMISSIO N WIRESOCT.Y 2006 M;\RF.Ai.F-%nDAS\Enclmtment10CU Field Hutel.doc i R`. y. .? ? tw v'J pulil Northside 509?'Sml&& loco to CIVIL • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION 0 ORIGINAL Drainage Calculations and Narrative For: Enchantment O r • / r rY ROR Ram A. GCY-4 #447 31 yy e q M .• L1 ,,? z En kv !`j iJ f.gJV? 3 y.) ? 4 P u, atF'' ,- .. .: w tali h "„may .:i I. _7 7- 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 NESADMIN@MINDSPRING.COM August 2005 NESTECH@MINDSPRING.COM Project No. 0527 727 • 443 • 2869 FAX 727 • 446 • 8036 • • Enchantment Environmental 1. The bottom of an open basin would be elevation 2.0. The existing grades at the property line is about 6. Offsetting the property line 16' does not leave the room to fit a 4050 cf basin. 2. Skimmers provided see details sheet C6.1 3. Details and sections provided see details sheet C6.1 4. Maintenance schedule attached. 5. ORIGINAL Stormwater 1. See revised construction plan 2. See attached drawdown analysis 3. See attached retention vault volume calculations and quality requirements. PLANmu, • August 10, 2005 Mr. Uday Lele 583 Mandalay Avenue, Suite 211 Tampa, Florida 33767 Reference: Enchantment Subject: Maintenance and Operation of the Detention Vault Dear Mr. Lele: ORIGINAL Per the rules and regulations of the Southwest Florida Water Management District, we are required to furnish you with a set of instructions for maintenance and operation of the detention vault. The detention vault is designed to maintain certain volumes of rainfall runoff corresponding to specific water elevations in the lake. The control structure regulates the level of the water in the vault. The volume above the slot should be discharged under a grease skimmer and through the slot within a few hours following a storm event. The volume below the slot should take less than 24 hours to be discharged through underdrain infiltration. The water level in the vault should drop approximately 1' below the slot and the vault should be dry within 24 hours following a storm event, assuming there is no interceding rainfall. Here are some suggested procedures to keep the system functional: • The bottom of the vault should be inspected regularly to assure that excess siltation has not occurred. Siltation of the vault shall be controlled to assure that the storage volume is not affected. Periodic cleaning of the vault bottom and removal of silts is required. It is required that cleaning be done every six (6) months. ra) 'r 7 ca Y C2 11 0 ? 10it ? Grass clippings and other debris should be removed from the parking area to assure they are not transported to the retention vault. • The control structure should be checked monthly and after severe rainfall events and all debris cleared. • Your Management of Surface Water Permit should contain a number of conditions which must be met. If you have any questions or concerns about this project please do not hesitate to call our office. Sincerely, Northside Engineering Services, Inc. 0 %am Does; •.* S%nio?t??*r R -$r ?? P G P s ry j i{ ;? v r...... jl 1 i NORTHSIDE ENGINEERING SERVICES RETENTION VAULT DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS PROJECT: Clearwater Grande PROJECT NO.: 450 VOLUME PROVIDED = 3,959 C.F. BOTTOM OF SLOT ELEV. = 3.75 BOTTOM OF POND ELEV. = 2.00 UNDERDRAIN INVERT ELEV. = 1.00 COEFFICIENT OF PERMEABILITY (K) = 0.09 FT/MIN LENGTH OF UNDERDRAIN = 60 FT SIZE OF UNDERDRAIN = 6 INCH is POND AREA (SF) = POND AREA (SF) = ORIGINAL 2,310 S.F. 2,310 S.F. ELEV. AVG. HEAD INCR HEAD L (AVG) HYD. GRAD. FILTER ARE FLOW POND AREA INCR VOL. INCR TIME FT FT FT FT FT/FT S.F. CFM S.F. C.F. MIN. 3.75 2,310 2.28 0.44 2.75 0.83 94 7.03 1,011 144 3.31 2,310 1.84 0.44 2.75 0.67 94 5.68 1,011 178 2.88 2,310 1.41 0.44 2.75 0.51 94 4.34 1,011 233 2.44 2,310 0.97 0.44 2.75 0.35 94 2.99 1,011 338 2.00 2,310 TOTAL DRAWDOWN VOLUME _ TOTAL DRAWDOWN TIME = 4,043 C.F. 14.9 HOURS PL& tit"d:Pj<?* I 0 0 PROJECT NAME : ENCHANTMENT PROJECT NO.: 0527 ORIGINAL POND'S STAGE STORAGE DATA : T.O.B. EL.= W.Q. EL.= BOTTOM EL.= STAGE ft-NGVD AREA SF AREA AC STORAGE CF 4.00 2,310 0.053 4,620 3.85 2,310 0.053 4,274 3.75 2,310 0.053 4,043 3.50 2,310 0.053 3,465 3.00 2,310 0.053 2,310 2.50 2,310 0.053 1,1 2.00 2,310, 0.053 jo TOTAL WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: DRAINAGE AREA = 63,344 SF REQUIRED WATER QUALITY DEPTH = 0.75 IN REQUIRED WATER QUALITY VOLUME = 3,959 CF PROPOSED OUTFALL ELEVATION = 3.75 FT AVAILABLE WATER QUALITY = {r? 4,043 CF • • FLD2005-06057 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 06/30/2005 ENCHANTMENT ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLWCoverSheet 6/30/2065 •?l` Receipt #: 1200500000000006131 4:14:11PM q ?= Date: 06/30/2005 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLD2005-06057 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00 Line Item Total: $1,205.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid f?_J Check ENCHANTMENT LLC R_D 1003 In Person Payment Total: 1,205.00 $1,205.00 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 cReceipt.rpt 0 0 FLD2005-06057 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Date Received: 06/30/2005 ENCHANTMENT ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 285A PLANNER OF RECORD: WW CLW CoverSheet v . PLANNING DEPARTMENT s C ITY OF C LEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL, SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 May 21, 2008 Uday Lele, President Enchantment, LLC 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33767 RE: FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Lele: On May 20, 2008, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 691 South Gulfview Boulevard shall be submitted by September 20, 2009. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael elk, AICP Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D. BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished Applicationsl Guljview S 0691 Enchantment (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 0691 CDB Time Extension Development Order 5.21.08.doc "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" ^`,m°?"??l:/?,f>rapgr??<ggs?yitsd! !i ?gi PLANNING DEPARTMENT • s CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 May 7, 2008 Uday Lele, President Enchantment, LLC 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Clearwater, FL 33767 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case No. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023) Dear Mr. Lele: You have filed a request for a time extension for the above referenced case. This time extension request has been scheduled for review by the Community Development Board on May 20, 2008. The meeting will take place at 1:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3rd floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. lSincerely, k1l [AX V.eM Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIGulfview S 0691 Enchantment (7) - Approved; 5.20.08 CDB Time ExtlGulfview S 0691 CDB. Time Extension Letter.doc "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" C\i ORIGINAL RECEIVED ENCHANTMENT APR 28, 2000 BEACHFRONT RESIDENCES PLANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Michael Delk CITY OF CLEARWATER Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 Re: Enchantment - FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - 691 Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Delk, Please accept this letter as my request for a 1-year extension from the Community Development Board for the above referenced Development Order for the Enchantment project on Clearwater Beach This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the specific criteria for our request is as follows: 1. We are still in the process of pre-sales and market conditions have been extremely slow. Construction lenders' have increased the number of pre-sales required to fund construction loans and this has hampered our ability to begin construction.. 2. Increase in construction costs has forced us to redo some of our architectural construction drawings in order to keep our costs in line while still maintaining our commitment to a quality product. 3. We also had to change architects to a firm better suited for the production drawings and this as also caused us some delay. As you will recall, our first Development Order was for a two-year duration to September 20, 2007. Subsequently you granted us a staff extension of one year to September 20, 2008 and I am now asking for my final extension of one year from the Community Development Board. Should you require any additional information, please contact me and I will see that you receive whatever information you may require. Thank ou for your 1 in this matter. Uday ele President Enchantment, LLC Cc: Keith Zayac, Ed Hooper, Joe Burdette 691 S. GuYview Blvd Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 1 T. 1.800.298.0696 1' www.enchantmentcondos:com ,off 1 ti PLANNING DEPARTMENT r s CITY OF CLEARWATER POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 September 20, 2007 Enchantment, LLC c/o Michael Balducci Stroock & Stroock & Lavin, LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038 Re: Zoning Verification Letter . 691 South Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, FL Dear Mr. Balducci: The subject property is zoned Tourist District (T) with the underlying future land use of Resort Facilities High (RFH). Further, the subject property is located within the South Beach/Clearwater Pass character district of the Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines. As of January 21, 1999, the City adopted the Community Development Code. This change may have created non-conformities, if so they are legal non-conformities and may continue. In the event a structure in which a non-conforming use is located is destroyed or damaged to the extent of less than 50 percent of the assessed value of such structure, the non-conforming use may be re-established if a complete and legally sufficient application for all required permits to repair or restore is submitted within six months of the date of the damage. In the event a structure in which a non-conforming use is located is destroyed or damaged to 50 percent or more of the assessed value, these structures may be repaired or restored only if the structure and the use conforms to the standards of this development code for the zoning district in which it is located. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 18 conditions Case No. FLD2005-05047/TDR2005-07023, which was a request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. On September 26, 2006. a Minor Revision to the building design was approved with four conditions. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made by September 20, 2007, and all required certificates of occupancy shall be FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER A"M CAREEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" September 20, 2007 Balducci - Page 2 obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building Planning Director approved an extension of time to September 20, building permit. The CDB may approve one additional extension extension to initiate a building permit application. permit. On October 20, 2006, the 2008, to submit an application for a of time after the Planning Director's Our records indicate active code violations with respect to signage and property maintenance. For additional information regarding code violations contact Bob Hall, Development Services Manager at 727- 562-4723 or bob.hall@Myclearwater.com. Certificates of Occupancy can be obtained from James Wagner, Development Review Supervisor, at 727-562-4562 or james.wagner@Myclearwater.com. Attached is a copy of the current Tourist zoning district regulations, as contained within the Community Development Code. Please contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner IIII (727-562-4504) or wayne.wells a,myclearwater.com if you need further assistance. Sincerely, Neil Thompson Development Review Manager S:IPlanningDepartmentlLettersIZoningLettersl691 S. GulfviewBlvd. (T) 9.20.07.doe .- ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN, CLIENT SERVICES AA0001629 MEMORANDUM To: City of Clearwater Date: 09 October 06 ... .......... .... Proj. No. .._06054/W1C . Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III Subject Enchantment P.O. Box 4748 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33758 By: J , AIA Architect' Response to ORIGINAL Review of Minor Revision Plans for Enchantment RECEIVED FLD2005-05057, 691 South Gulfview Blvd. OCT 12 2006 September 26, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Issue: Architect's Resnonse: 1. Due to structure side setback requirements of 10 feet, By the Florida Building Code, we are required to provide a Sheets C3.1; C4.1, 1-1.1, A200 and A300 must be revised to path of travel from the south stairs to a public way. The show the sidewalk from the rear exit corridors to the front path must be 10'-0" away from the bldg. to allow for non- along the east side of the property to be adjacent to the rated openings in the wall. Since this building is in an AE building rather than adjacent to the property line. Flood Zone, the ground floor exterior walls must have unprotected flow through vents in them to meet FEMA Regulations. In order to meet the requirements of the Florida Building Code & FEMA, the walk must remain 10' from the building. 2. A sidewalk connector must be shown on Sheets C3.1, C4.1, The stair at the South West corner is not a means of 1-1.1, A200 and A300 from the circular stairs at the egress. This is a convenience stair only; we request that southwest corner to the sidewalk along the rear of the this walk not be required. building. 3. Reconcile the number of openings in the wall on the Our Plans have now been corrected. northern most west side, as shown on Sheets A300 & A301, with the west elevation on Sheet A402. 4. Revise Sheet A401 to show the square footage requirement The notation has been revised. of 60 percent openings and decoration to be 19,449.37 square feet. -k. r1 ?1? tA VA . C? e, hle wa?.? 4301 Anchor Plaza Parkway Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33634-7525 Voice: 813.884.2000 Fax: 813.884.0700 -IY Voice: architect@coliman-karsky.com WWW.coliman-karsky.com l'o/L3l,o (o ?COLLMAN&KARSKY ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN, CLIENT SERVICES AA0001629 To: City of Clearwater Wayne M. Wells 100 S. Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33758 _.? Mail Courier Pickup TRANSMITTAL Date: 10 October 06, Proj. No. 06054/W1C Subject: Enchantment _..._..._ ........... ............ .................... _...__.._.........._.................... _ .._..__.._..... ....... .._........... _......... _..... _........... ........... ... .................... .... _... L.- By: ..... ....._........... ._....._........._................--..---._.............................. ]oh . Like Hand Carry Fax # Copies Pages Date Description 1 1 10.09.06 Memorandum Prepared by Collman & Karsky Architects RECEIVED PLANNING DEPARn4chrr QffY OF CLEARWATER Copy To: Transmittal Only: With Enclosures: 4301 Anchor Plaza Parkway Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33634-7525 Voice: 813.884.2000 Fax: 813.884.0700 architect@collman-karsky.com www.coliman-karsky.com r > t? i r ,s r. LONG RANGr PLANNING DrvrLOPMrNT RI:v1i:W Mr. E. D. Armstrong III Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: FLD2005-05047 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard - Enchantment Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Armstrong: October 20, 2006 On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above application for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Condition of Approval #3 by the CDB requires the application for a building permit within two years of the date the CDB approved the request (September 20, 2007). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On September 22, 2006, (augmented by additional information on October 19, 2006) you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited the problem of obtaining a wind tunnel test, due to the unique design of the structure with a five-story open arch, in order to finalize construction documents and the requirement of prospective construction lenders of evidence of development approval providing a reasonable timeframe for permitting the project. PRANK I IIHIiARD, 1NIMOR CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT PossT OFFICE. Box 4748, CLEARWATFR, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SrRvici;s BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE. AVENUE, CLFARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 THLFPHONIi (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 JDIIN DORAN, Col mAi_\11.mlwlR I Ic»-I' I I:UIII:R)N, COI NCIOWNIBER 13n.i. JONxIN, C01 NCH. WN11WH CARI.HN A. PrrERSr:r:. Col Nc11..\11:m IER "EQ1 JAI. EMPLOYNIFNT AND Ar•Fir,,NIATIVI, Acru>N 1??u Lovia:r , I . . ?1 0 9 October 20, 2006 Armstrong - Page Two In accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a one-year time extension to September 20, 2008, to submit an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 691 South Gulfview Boulevard. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, -51icfiaeC Planning Director S.• (Planning Departmentl C D BIFLEX (FLD) (Inactive or Finished Applications)Gulfview S 0691 Enchantment (7) - ApprovedlGulfview S 691 Time Ext. Dev. Order 10.20.06.doc 0 • JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNE& SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTTC. ILGENFRFTZ FRANK IL JAKES TIMOTHY A JOHNSON. JR.' SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU• MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE BRETON H. PERMESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI October 19, 2006 Via Email and U.S. Mail Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Case Nos. FLD2005-06057/TDR 2005-07023 Dear Michael: DENNIS G. RUPPEL• CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON 'OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE ND. 46069.109803 ORIGINAL RECEIVED VCT 19 2006 VLANMNG' UEPA16vitNT CM OF CLE.ARWATER On behalf of the applicant and property owner, Enchantment, LLC, we hereby request a one-year extension of the time to initiate a building permit as set forth in the development order for the referenced project, from September 20, 2007 to September 20, 2008. This request is made in accordance with Section 4407 of the Clearwater Community Development Code, which provides that an extension of not more than one year may be granted by the Community Development Coordinator. Due to the unique design of the project, which includes a five-story open arch, the owner must obtain a wind-tunnel test. It may take four or five months to obtain the wind-tunnel test report. The results of the test must then be incorporated into construction drawings. It will not be possible to finalize construction drawings in time to pull a building permit by September 20, 2007. Although the development order does not expire for another 11 months, we request that the extension be granted-at this time because prospective construction lenders require evidence of development approval that provides fora more reasonable timeframe for permitting the project. CLEARWATTaTt OFFICE TAMPA OFFICE 911 CHESTNUTST. 403 EAST MADISON ST. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 3 3 75 7-1 368) SUITE 4W CLEARWATER. FLORIDA 33756 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601.1100) TELEPHONE: (727)461-1818 TAMPA. FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPIER: (727) 462.0365 TELEPHONE! (813)2754500 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 TELECOPIER: (813) 223.71 IS Y JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Michael Delk, AICP October 19, 2006 Page 2 Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP F. D. Armstrong Ill EDA/js cc: Mr. Uday Lele #387253 v1 - Lt. Michael Delk SIGNED IN ATTORNEYS ABSENCE TO PREVENT DELAY IN MAILING r 0 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & At, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE If. BOKOR J014N R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAELT. CRONIN ELIZABETH J. DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANTON COLLEEN M.FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. JAKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON, JR.* SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU* MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE BRETON H. PERMESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. W'ILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO..109803 September 22, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk Community Development Coordinator City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Development Order Number FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 Dear Michael: As you know, our firm represents the Enchantment project, which was approved pursuant to the referenced Development Order. The referenced Development Order expires September 30, 2007. We are respectfully requesting a one year extension of the Development Order, to September 30, 2008. We appreciate your response to our request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPE'& BURNS, LLP RECEIVED E. D. Armstrong III OCT 03 2005 E DA/I rc PLANNING DEPARTMENT cc: Mr. Uday Lele CRY ppCIEARWATER Mr. Ed Hooper CLE ROFFICE 3? 403 EATA MPA OFFICE 911 1 CHES CHES 1I 'INUTS'C. 5 ST MADISON ST'. POST OFFICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) SUITE 400 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 33601-1 100.) TELEPHONE- (727) 461.1818 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 ,? •- ,, / TELEPHONE: (813) 225-2500 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 r^ Z,?e TELECOPIER: (813) 223-71 18 ?OPE BOKOR RUPPEL & BU• JOHNSO S> LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW E. D. ARMSTRONG III BRUCE H. BOKOR JOHN R. BONNER, SR.* GUY M. BURNS JONATHAN S. COLEMAN MICHAEL T_ CRONIN ELIZABETH J DANIELS BECKY FERRELL-ANION COLLEEN M. FLYNN RYAN C. GRIFFIN RINAT HADAS MARION HALE SCOTT C. ILGENFRITZ FRANK R. 1AKES TIMOTHY A. JOHNSON. JR.* SHARON E. KRICK ROGER A. LARSON ANGELINA E. LIM MICHAEL G. LITTLE CHIH-PIN LU* MICHAEL C. MARKHAM ZACHARY D. MESSA A. R. "CHARLIE" NEAL TROY J. PERDUE BRETON H. PERMESLY F. WALLACE POPE, JR. ROBERT V. POTTER, JR. JENNIFER A. REH DARRYL R. RICHARDS PETER A. RIVELLINI DENNIS G. RUPPEL* CHARLES A. SAMARKOS KIMBERLY L. SHARPE JOAN M. VECCHIOLI STEVEN H. WEINBERGER JOSEPH J. WEISSMAN STEVEN A. WILLIAMSON *OF COUNSEL PLEASE REPLY TO CLEARWATER FILE NO. 46069.109803 Via Email and U.S. Mail Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director City of Clearwater, Florida 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 October 19, 2006 Re: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Case Nos. FLD2005-06057/TDR 2005-07023 Dear Michael: On behalf of the applicant and property owner, Enchantment, LLC, we hereby request a one-year extension of the time to initiate a building permit as set forth in the development order for the referenced project, from September 20, 2007 to September 20, 2008. This request is made in accordance with Section 4-407 of the Clearwater Community Development Code, which provides that an extension of not more than one year may be granted by the Community Development Coordinator. Due to the unique design of the project, which includes a five-story open arch, the owner must obtain a wind-tunnel test. It may take four or five months to obtain the wind-tunnel test report. The results of the test must then be incorporated into construction drawings. It will not be possible to finalize construction drawings in time to pull a building permit by September 20, 2007. Although the development order does not expire for another 11 months, we request that the extension be granted-at this time because prospective construction lenders require evidence of development approval that provides for a more reasonable timeframe for permitting the project. CLEARWATER OFFICE 911 CHESTNUT ST POSTOFF'ICE BOX 1368 (ZIP 33757-1368) C:LEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 'TELEPHONE: (727) 461.1818 TELECOPIER: (727) 462-0365 TELECOPIER: (727) 441-8617 OCT 'L 4 2006 1 TAMPA OFFICE 403 EAST MADISON ST. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT sulTEaoo POST OFFICE BOX 1100 (ZIP 3360 1-1I00) SERVICES TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602 TELEPHONE: OF CLEARWATER TELECOPER:(813)22371018 JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELLORS AT LAW Mr. Michael Delk, AICP October 19, 2006 Page 2 Thank you for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, JOHNSON, POPE, BOKOR, RUPPEL & BURNS, LLP E. D. Armstrong III EDA/js cc: Mr. Uday Lele #387253 v1 - Lt. Michael Delk SIGNED IN ATTORNEY'S ABSENCE TO PREVENT DELAY IN MAILING 11 91t TO t Iy! QFt. 4^. ITY OF C LEARWATE R 1 + ? r PLANNING DEPARTMENT »• ?4TEPOST OI=Plcl: Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FI.oRIDA 33758-4748 ?iiitl MUNICIPAI. SHRVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR"rLE AVENUE, CLEARWATI?R, FLORIDA 33756 Ti.'LEPHONI? (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REM Mr. Jeff R. Mendenhall Collman & Karsky Architects 4301 Anchor Plaza Parkway, Suite 100 Tampa, Florida 33634-7525 Re: Development Order - Minor Revision FLD2005-05047 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard - Enchantment Dear Mr. Mendenhall: September 26, 2006 On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 18 conditions the above referenced case, which was a request for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. A proposal has been submitted to revise the approved project with the following: • Plans approved by the CDB had Levels 3 - 11 stepped back approximately 16 feet for the eastern tower and nine feet for the western tower from the front of the building on Levels 1 - 2, and then Levels 12 - 16 were further stepped back an approximately 16 feet for the eastern tower and 17 feet for the western tower. The proposed plans bring the front of Levels 3 - 11 to almost the same setback as Levels 1 - 2, while Levels 11 - 15 still further steps back approximately 17 feet for the eastern tower and 10 feet for the western tower (six-foot step back for Levels 11 - 12 and an additional four feet for Levels 13 - 15). • Removed one floor of the building while still maintaining the same number of units through a redistribution of units per floor and the same building height; • Reconfigured the parking areas to provide better circulation, fewer dead ends and ramps less steep than on the approved plans, while maintaining at least two parking spaces per unit; • Increased the rear setback to proposed balconies; • Resolved structural issues from the approved plans to provide constructability of the building; FRANK 1111MARD. MAYOR JcmN Doi",%N, Ccwncai.Mt;,\usT:r, IIOVI I[ANIIIAON, O NCHAIH\IRh:R BILLJUNSUN, C(Hh\'CIL,\n:nntiat ® Cmai::N A. h;Ii;RSFN, Ccx:NC:n..\nautra: 'T"Q1JAI, EMPLOYNIFNIT AND Arr•u;ntAriw AcruRN 1?,\u LcRVitR • September 26, 2006 Mendenhall - Page 2 0 In accordance with Section 4-406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a Minor Revision and are APPROVED with the following conditions that must be addressed on the site, landscape and building plans for building permits: 1. Due to structure side setback requirements of 10 feet, Sheets C3.1, C4.1, L1.1, A200 and A300 must be revised to show the sidewalk from the rear exit corridors to the front along the east side of the property to be adjacent to the building rather than adjacent to the property line; 2. A sidewalk connector must be shown on Sheets C3.1, C4.1, L1.1, A200 and A300 from the circular stairs at the southwest corner to the sidewalk along the rear of the building; 3. Reconcile the number of openings in the wall on the northernmost west side, as shown on Sheets A300 and A301, with the west elevation on Sheet A402; and 4.. Revise Sheet A401 to show the square footage requirement of 60 percent openings and decoration to be 19,449.37 square feet. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael Delk, CP Planning Director Cc: Ed Hooper S: (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslGulfview S 0691 Enchantment (7) - ApprovedIGulfview S 69l Minor Revisions Development Order 9.26 06doc • 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 5:15 PM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Subject: RE: Joe Burdette -Re: Enchantment Sorry - hit the wrong button. See attached. -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 1:27 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Joe Burdette -Re: Enchantment Wayne Could you please email me the minor amendment D.O. letter for enchantment. Thanks Joe 10/2/2006 (__ 0 ' ORIGINAL LL_ RECEIVED ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN, CLIENT SERVICES AA0001629 SEP 14 2006 MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER To: City of Clearwater Date: 13 September 06 Proj. No. 06054 WiC _ P.O. Box 4748 Subject Enchantment 100 S. Myrtle Avenue /I A X 'd Clearwater, Florida 33758 By. _J_. - Menden all, IA Architect' Response to Review of Minor Revision Plans for Enchantment FLD2005-06057, 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. August 23, 2006 Issue: Architect's Resnnnse! 1. Sheets C3.1, C4.1 & L1.1 - Remove "88 spaces" from area Completed. south of property north of words "Gulf of Mexico'. 2. Sheet CIA - Based on the parking spaces shown on Sheets There are now a total of 185 parking stalls. A300, A301 and A302, I counted a total of 181 parking Additional parking stalls have been added by spaces. Revise numbers on this sheet. reducing the space required for the building's main services. 3. Sheet C4.1 - Fire Department connection (FDC) must be Sheet has been revised. within 40 feet of the fire hydrant. Revise. 4. Sheet L1.1 - Redesign front landscaping to this new design Sheet has been revised. that doesn't have a flattened "V" of a walkway in front of the building. 5. Sheet L1.1 - Revise Landscaping Note #8 to provide trees Note has been revised. 10' tall and 2.5" caliper. 6. Sheet L1.1 - Provide a note regarding landscape irrigation. Note has been added. 7. Sheet L1.1 - Ensure all plant and tree materials shown on Counts have been verified and revised the plan are listed in the Landscape Table and are counted according. accurately. 8. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a An accessible van-parking stall has been minimum of 8'-2". identified on Level 1. An area indicating a minimum clearance of 98" has been noted. 9. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels Templates have been added. at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. 10. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive The parking garage is fully compliant with the aisles on all parking levels. City of Clearwater zoning requirements for parking stalls and aisles width. The obstruction of site lines is minimal and is less than parking next to a taller vehicle (SUV, Pick-Truck, large sedan). We don't believe any additional measures are necessary or required. 4301 Anchor Plaza Parkway Suite.100 Tampa, FL 33634-7525 Voice: 813.884.2000 Fax: 813.884.0700 architect@coliman-karsky.com www.collman-ka rsky:com • 13-Sep-06 Page 2 11. Sheets A300, A301 and A302 - A number of parking spaces Mirrors have been added at several locations require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the solid walls on levels 1, 2 and 3 to provide better visibility of the entry into the parking garage, the elevator lobbies or where walls completely block the view of a car trash rooms. Provide visibility improvements (mirrors or backing up. other alternative measures). 12. Sheets A300, A301 and A302 - Provide the percentage slope A notation indicating the percentage of slope for all ramps in the parking garage to get to/from Level 1 to has been added. Level 2 and to from Level 2 to Level 3. 13. Sheet A300 - Label the proposed use of the room outside The space has been labeled. the main building next to the east side of the driveway. 14. Sheets A200 and A300 - Sidewalk along the south side of Sheets have been revised. the building leading eastward from the exit corridors and then along the east property line is inconsistent with that shown on Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1. Revise to that shown on the civil site plans. 15. Sheets A200 and A300 - Cabanas and storage rooms along Sheets have been revised. the south side of the building are inconsistent with that shown on Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1, especially at the southwest corner. Revise/make consistent. 16. Sheets A300 and A301 - Based on Sheet 402, the The plans and elevations have been revised. northernmost three "openings" on the west side are not openings, but rather are CMU walls with stucco insets to indicate "o enin s". Revise. 17. Sheet A301 - Unclear how the generator room is accessed This area has been revised. ? . Revise. 18. Sheet A301 - Revise note in the southwest portion of the The notations have been revised. parking garage for the higher flat area between the ramps from "Elevation +20' 0" above Level 2" to "Elevation +20" above Level 2". 19. Sheet A301 - Provide backup "flair" area of approximately a The "flair" area of a minimum of 36" has been three-foot area as an extension of the drive aisle for added. northernmost spaces for the eastern and western parking rows difficult to exit the end parking spaces). 20. Sheet A302 - Provide backup "flair" area of approximately a The "flair" area of a minimum of 36" has been three-foot area as an extension of the drive aisle for added. northernmost space for the eastern parking row (difficult to exit the end parking space). 21. There are a total of 90 attached dwelling units in this The additional lockers are for building storage building. Unclear why there are a total of 106 storage or for those owners who desire additional lockers provided (16 on Level 2, 46 on Level 3 and 44 on storage space. Level 8 ? . Advise revise. 22. Sheet A302 - Label the use of the rooms up front in the This area has been revised. northeast corner of the building and show how they are accessed. 23. Sheet A302 - Unclear (please label) what the structures are The structures have been deleted at the that are on the roof area and shown on the northeast and Northeast corner. A wall screens the northwest corners of the building (northwest corner includes mechanical equipment at the Northwest an a/c unit). If mechanical equipment, need to screen from corner. view those on the northeast corner of the building (see Sheet 403). 24. Sheet A307 - Revise the note in both storage rooms that The note has been revised. there are only 22 lockers instead of 23 lockers. 25. Sheet A310 - Unclear (please label) what the structures are The structures have been deleted. that are on the roof area and shown on the east side of the building (see Sheet 403). If mechanical equipment, need to screen from view. Page 2 of 4 • • 13-Sep-06 Page 3 26. Sheet A313 - Renumber units to 1- 4. Units have been renumbered. 27. Sheet A315 - The squares/rectangles represented on the The elevator and stair overruns have been roof appear to be elevator towers 1 - 5, yet these elevator added to the elevations. mechanical overruns are not depicted on the elevations on Sheets 400, 401, 402 and 403. If elevator overruns, show them on the elevation sheets as to their design. 28. Sheets 400, 401, 402 and 403 - Renumber the floor levels The levels have been renumbered. from 0 - 14 to 1 - 15 to be consistent with Sheets A300 - A313. 29. Sheet 400 - Gates/railings (05.02) in front of the trash A note has been added to the elevation. staging room need to be opaque to not provide views of the dum sters. 30. Sheet 400 - Only the eastern (left side) dome is an actual The note has been changed. elevator overrun/mechanical projection. The middle and western domes are solely architectural embellishments. Change note on right hand side where height dimensions are shown. 31. Sheets 401, 402 and 403 - The "open" openings provide An architectural grille has been added to help views of the vehicles parked on Levels 1, 2 and 3. Plans obscure the vehicles. approved by the CDB did not indicate such "openings". What can be done to visually obscure views of the parked vehicles? 32. Sheet 402 - Show sliding glass door (not windows) on south The elevation has been revised. (right) side of Unit 7 on Level 3. 33. Sheet 403 - Levels 11- 15 - There is a large expanse of A window and architectural decoration has bland/blank wall in the middle of the building on these been added to this location. levels. The approved plans did not have such an expanse of bland/blank wall. What can be done to improve the visual appeal of the wall on these floors? 34. Provide documentation on the plans (provide dimensions) Sheet A200 shows the distance of this project that the eastern wall on Levels 11 - 15 (east of station line at levels 11-15 in relation the proposed 9.4) is 100 feet from the residential tower approved at 715 project to the East at the 100'-0" elevation South Gulfview Blvd. to the east. height. 35. Provide documentation that at least 60 percent of any See calculations on Sheets 400-404. elevation is covered with windows or architectural decoration. 36. Plans approved by the CDB had Levels 3 - 11 stepped back The shift of the building occurs only as a approximately 16 feet for the eastern tower and nine feet for portion of the structure. The shift of the the western tower from the front of the building on Levels 1 "tower" portion of the building can be - 2, and then Levels 12 - 16 were further stepped back an attributed to three main items: approximately 16 feet for the eastern tower and 17 feet for 1) Improving the view corridor of the the western tower. The proposed plans bring the front of beach for the adjacent properties Levels 3 - 11 to almost the same setback as Levels 1 - 2, while not violating the setback along while Levels 11 - 15 still further steps back approximately 17 the street and reducing the amount feet for the eastern tower and 10 feet for the western tower of balcony and stairs violating the (six-foot step back for Levels 11 - 12 and an additional four rear setback. feet for Levels 13 - 15). Provide an explanation as to why 2) Providing for the minimum 100'-0" the towers moved northward to essentially coincide with the setback from the adjacent properties north wall of the parking garage and how the proposal is in at elevation 100'-0". compliance with Section 4-406.A.5 "Does not result in a 3) To resolve inconsistencies with the substantial change to the location of a structure previously plans, elevations, and rendering that approved," and Section 4-406.A.9 "Any other minor revision had originally been submitted. that does not substantially alter the character and design of While addressing refinement of the structural the project." design, the look of the building has changed somewhat. However, the character and its essential elements have remained a part of the design and appearance. Page 3 of 4 13-Sep-06 Page 4 37. Since this building is a high-rise building, the Building Code We have revised the exiting from the North requires pressurized stairwells that exit to the outside stair towers to allow for a pressurized exit through corridors. Stairwells on the north side do not have corridor on Level 2. The exit corridor such corridors. Revise Sheets C3.1, C4.1, L1.1, A200 and terminates at the entry plaza on level 2. A300 to provide such corridors. It is assumed at this point Occupants walk outside of the building, across that the redesign to provide such corridors will impact the the plaza, down two stairs to the street. We parking garage layout and the number of parking spaces, have met with the Building Department and most likely dropping the provided parking below that Fire Marshall to review the exiting strategy. indicated on the approved plans and below current parking In that preliminary review and subsequent requirements of two parking spaces per unit. We prefer not follow up emails, those departments feel the to drop below two parking spaces per unit. Additionally, requirements have been met for exiting the show exit sidewalks outside the building from these corridors occupants from the building. These change and their impact on the site layout (such as landscape have no negative impact on the parking count desi n . or la out as designed. Page 4 of 4 r • 6L A I-A _ _.?? • • J l .L-10' .01- .01-1101 .1-10( ?I I .t, 01-1201 .1-1001 .1-1001 Z) 0 0 9 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 8:29 AM To: 'Hunraf@aol.com' Subject: RE: Joe Burdette - Re: Enchantment Minor Revisions Comments Joe - Item 34 - As you requested, I have placed at the greeter station in our office for your pickup copies of the site plan for the project to the east which shows where their tower is located. Provide visual documentation (dimensions) as part of the plans that there is at least a 100-foot separation between the adjoining towers above 100 feet (note: the tower to the east does not step back any distance from the outer edge shown for the entire height of the tower). Item 36 - Provide the appropriate justification explanation. Item 37 - We look forward to the revised plans. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Hunraf@aol.com [mailto:Hunraf@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 1:59 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Ehooperl@aol.com Subject: Joe Burdette - Re: Enchantment Minor Revisions Coments Wayne A couple of quick question regarding Enchantment: 1. Item 34: We have not moved the building in anyway to the east side so it remains where it was at CDB approval and we met the 100 foot distance form the Sun Spree project. As we have a new architect, he does not have any of that info that was in our original plan that Gillette did, so he does not know how to demonstrate that to you. Can we just work with the old plan and simply say we have not moved the building and it is the same as originally designed (which is 100 foot or more from Sun Spree)? I could also come in and get the info from you if you would pull the original application and we can look at it together. Just let me know how you want us to handle this. 2. Item 36: Yes the towers have been moved forward a bit but are still within the setbacks. Is this still a problem? Item 37: Just FYI: We can handle this and still have 2 spaces per unit Let me know. My phone # is 727-458-4528 if we need to talk about this. Joe 8/17/2006 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:16 PM To: 'architect@colIman-karsky.com' Cc: Ed Hooper (E-mail); Joe Burdette (E-mail) Subject: Jeff Mendenhall - Minor Revision for Enchantment, 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jeff - I (and other DRC members) have reviewed the submitted plans for the Minor Revision for the above referenced project and am attaching comments that need to be addressed on the civil and architectural plans. Please revise the plans and provide one set (civil and architectural), along with a cover letter responding to the attached comments. Once the revisions are submitted and reviewed (assuming the changes are acceptable), a Development Order for the Minor Revision request would be issued. Wayne Review of Minor Revision Plans... so r . 0 Review of Minor Revision Plans for Enchantment FLD2005-06057, 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. August 15, 2006 1. Sheets C3.1, C4.1 & L1.1 - Remove "88 spaces" from area south of property (north of words "Gulf of Mexico"). 2. Sheet C1.1 - Based on the parking spaces shown on Sheets A300, A301 and A302, I counted a total of 181 parking spaces. Revise numbers on this sheet. 3. Sheet C4.1 - Fire Department connection (FDC) must be within 40 feet of the fire hydrant. Revise. 4. Sheet LL I - Redesign front landscaping to this new design that doesn't have a flattened "V" of a walkway in front of the building. 5. Sheet L1.1 - Revise Landscaping Note #8 to provide trees 10' tall and 2.5" caliper. 6. Sheet L1.1 - Provide a note regarding landscape irrigation. 7. Sheet L1.1 - Ensure all plant and tree materials shown on the plan are listed in the Landscape Table and are counted accurately. 8. Ensure the vertical height clearance for handicap van is a minimum of 8'-2". 9. Show passenger car turning template on all parking levels at corners to ensure cars do not have to enter opposing lanes for vehicular maneuvering. 10. Columns need to be set back from the edge of the drive aisles on all parking levels. 11. Sheets A300, A301 and A302 - A number of parking spaces require the drivers to back out "blind" due to the solid walls of the entry into the parking garage, the elevator lobbies or trash rooms. Provide visibility improvements (mirrors or other alternative measures). 12. Sheets A300, A301 and A302 - Provide the percentage slope for all ramps in the parking garage to get to/from Level 1 to Level 2 and to/from Level 2 to Level 3. 13. Sheet A300 - Label the proposed use of the room outside the main building next to the east side of the driveway. 14. Sheets A200 and A300 - Sidewalk along the south side of the building leading eastward from the exit corridors and then along the east property line is inconsistent with that shown on Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1. Revise to that shown on the civil site plans. 15. Sheets A200 and A300 - Cabanas and storage rooms along the south side of the building are inconsistent with that shown on Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1, especially at the southwest corner. Revise/make consistent. 16. Sheets A300 and A301 - Based on Sheet 402, the northernmost three "openings" on the west side are not openings, but rather are CMU walls with stucco insets to indicate "openings". Revise. 17. Sheet A301 - Unclear how the generator room is accessed (?). Revise. Page 1 of 3 18. Sheet A301 - Revise note in the southwest portion of the parking garage for the higher flat area between the ramps from "Elevation +20' 0" above Level 2" to "Elevation +20" above Level 2". 19. Sheet A301 - Provide backup "flair" area of approximately a three-foot area as an extension of the drive aisle for northernmost spaces for the eastern and western parking rows (difficult to exit the end parking spaces). 20. Sheet A302 - Provide backup "flair" area of approximately a three-foot area as an extension of the drive aisle for northernmost space for the eastern parking row (difficult to exit the end parking space). 21. There are a total of 90 attached dwelling units in this building. Unclear why there are a total of 106 storage lockers provided (16 on Level 2, 46 on Level 3 and 44 on Level 8) (?). Advise/revise. 22. Sheet A302 - Label the use of the rooms up front in the northeast corner of the building and show how they are accessed. 23. Sheet A302 - Unclear (please label) what the structures are that are on the roof area and shown on the northeast and northwest corners of the building (northwest corner includes an a/c unit). If mechanical equipment, need to screen from view those on the northeast corner of the building (see Sheet 403). 24. Sheet A307 - Revise the note in both storage rooms that there are only 22 lockers instead of 23 lockers. 25. Sheet A310 - Unclear (please label) what the structures are that are on the roof area and shown on the east side of the building (see Sheet 403). If mechanical equipment, need to screen from view. 26. Sheet A313 - Renumber units to 1 - 4. 27. Sheet A315 - The squares/rectangles represented on the roof appear to be elevator towers 1 - 5, yet these elevator mechanical overruns are not depicted on the elevations on Sheets 400, 401, 402 and 403. If elevator overruns, show them on the elevation sheets as to their design. 28. Sheets 400, 401, 402 and 403 - Renumber the floor levels from 0 - 14 to 1 - 15 to be consistent with Sheets A300 - A313. 29. Sheet 400 - Gates/railings (05.02) in front of the trash staging room need to be opaque to not provide views of the dumpsters. 30. Sheet 400 - Only the eastern (left side) dome is an actual elevator overrun/mechanical projection. The middle and western domes are solely architectural embellishments. Change note on right hand side where height dimensions are shown. 31. Sheets 401, 402 and 403 - The "open" openings provide views of the vehicles parked on Levels 1, 2 and 3. Plans approved by the CDB did not indicate such "openings". What can be done to visually obscure views of the parked vehicles? 32. Sheet 402 - Show sliding glass door (not windows) on south (right) side of Unit 7 on Level 3. 33. Sheet 403 - Levels 11- 15 - There is a large expanse of blandiblank wall in the middle of the building on these levels. The approved plans did not have such an expanse of blandiblank wall. What can be done to improve the visual appeal of the wall on these floors? Page 2 of 3 4 0 0 34. Provide documentation on the plans (provide dimensions) that the eastern wall on Levels 11 - 15 (east of station line 9.4) is 100 feet from the residential tower approved at 715 South Gulfview Blvd. to the east. 35. Provide documentation that at least 60 percent of any elevation is covered with windows or architectural decoration. 36. Plans approved by the CDB had Levels 3 -11 stepped back approximately 16 feet for the eastern tower and nine feet for the western tower from the front of the building on Levels 1 - 2, and then Levels 12 - 16 were further stepped back an approximately 16 feet for the eastern tower and 17 feet for the western tower. The proposed plans bring the front of Levels 3 - 11 to almost the same setback as Levels 1 - 2, while Levels 11 - 15 still further steps back approximately 17 feet for the eastern tower and 10 feet for the western tower (six-foot step back for Levels 11 - 12 and an additional four feet for Levels 13 - 15). Provide an explanation as to why the towers moved northward to essentially coincide with the north wall of the parking garage and how the proposal is in compliance with Section 4-406.A.5 "Does not result in a substantial change to the location of a structure previously approved," and Section 4-406.A.9 "Any other minor revision that does not substantially alter the character and design of the project." 37. Since this building is a high-rise building, the Building Code requires pressurized stairwells that exit to the outside through corridors. Stairwells on the north side do not have such corridors. Revise Sheets C3.1, C4.1, L1.1, A200 and A300 to provide such corridors. It is assumed at this point that the redesign to provide such corridors will impact the parking garage layout and the number of parking spaces, most likely dropping the provided parking below that indicated on the approved plans and below current parking requirements of two parking spaces per unit. We prefer not to drop below two parking spaces per unit. Additionally, show exit sidewalks outside the building from these corridors and their impact on the site layout (such as landscape design). S: (Planning DepartmentICD BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished Applications lGulfview S 0691 Enchantment (T) - ApprovedIReview of Minor Revision Plans 8.15.06.doc Page 3 of 3 r • • COLLMAN&KARSK'f -, ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE, INTERIOR DESIGN, CLIENT SERVICES AA0001629 ORIGINAL July 19, 2006 RECEIVED Mr. Wayne Wells, AICP JUL 2 0 2006 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Clearwater, Florida 33756 CITY OF CLEARWATER Re: Development Order- Case Nos. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023- 691 South Gulfview Blvd Dear Mr. Wells, Collman & Karsky Architects has been retained by the Developer to assume the above project from the Design Architect, Gillett Associates ARDT Group. As we began to advance the design we noted that there were numerous issues with the original design that were not thoroughly thought through, making the exact schematic documents approved in the Development Order structurally unbuildable. Over the last 2 months we have gone through a process of adjusting the original design concept so that it now can be built (structurally) with only minor adjustments to the approved design. We are submitting this letter, along with revised plans and renderings, requesting that these changes be viewed as a Minor Revision to the Level Two Approval at an administrative level. The following Site Data Table compares the fundamentals of the project from what was approved to the new design: Approved: Prnnncorl Zoning: Parcel 1: T Parcel 1: T Parcel 2: OS/R Parcel 2: OS/R Land Use: Parcel 1: RFH Parcel 1: RFH - Parcel2: P Parcel 2: P Usage: Attached Dwellin s Attached Dwellings Lot Area: Parcel 1: 58,978 S. F. Parcel 1: 58,978 S. F. 1.359 AC. 1.359 AC. Parcel 2: 4,366 S.F Parcel 2: 4,366 S. F. Density: 0.100 AC. ' 0.100 AC. 82+ 8 TD R s 82+ 8 TDR's Building Coverage. 90 Units 41,392 S. F. 90 Units 41 079 S F S.F. & % of Gross Site 70.2% , . . 69 7% Gross Floor Area (S.F.): ----- . ----- FAR: - Building Front: 15' to Building 15' to Building Setbacks: 7' to Walk N.A to Walk Side: 15' to Building (E & W) ' . 15' to Building (E & W) 10 to Walk 11' to Walk E Rear: 20' to Building 20' to Building Building Height from B.F.E : 15.7' to Walk 150' 15.9' to Walk ' . Paved Vehicular Use Area .U.A.: 817 S. F. 150 1 612 S F Impervious Surface Ratio (I.S.R.): 43,868 S. F. , . . 44,372 S. F. Open Space (S.F. & % of Gross 74% 15,110 S. F. 75.2% 14 606 S F Site : 26% , . . 24.8% Parking Lot Interior Landscaping N/A N/A S.F. & % of V.U.A. : Parkin Count: 180 180 4301 Anchor. Plaza' Parkway Suite 100 Tampa; FL 33634-7525 Voice: 813.884.2600 Fax: 813.884. 0100 archltect@collman-karsky.com www.colliman-karsky.com 19-Jul-06 Page 2 FLOOR SPACES UNITS SPACES UNITS 1 90 0 91 0 2 57 0 70 0 3 33 4 19 2 4 0 9 0 8 5 0 9 0 8 6 0 8 0 8 7 0 8 0 8 8 0 9 0 8 9 0 9 0 10 10 0 9 0 10 11 0 7 0 6 12 0 5 0 6 13 0 5 0 6 14 0 5 0 6 15 0 2 0 4 16 0 1 0 N/A Total: 180 90 180 90 The following Parking/ Unit Table compares the fundamentals of the project from what was approved to the new design: Approved: Proposed: To summarize the above tables, the building in the proposed modified design has the same number of units and parking stalls, almost the same footprint on the site, and the same height with one less floor. The approved plans had a 7' front setback to the entrance sidewalk and a 0' setback to the trash staging area; the proposed plans show in excess of 15' to the entrance sidewalk and 15' setback to the trash staging area. The approved plans reduced the rear setback from 20' to 14' for cantilevered balconies; the new plans reduce the same setback to 18' for proposed balconies. It's understood that all of the listed Bases for Approval from the September 30, 2005 Development Order still apply. As can be seen from the table above, the approved project had one more floor than the proposed. The loss of the floor was necessary so that the height it occupied could be utilized (distributed amongst several floors) to resolve structural issues. Even though the exterior massing and shape of the building has changed slightly from the approved (many of the elements in the original design could not be built structurally with the height limitations), the general character of the project has been preserved. The exterior colors and materials have remained unchanged. One of the significant changes from the approved plans to the new is the layout of the parking garage. The approved design suffered from a "fatal flaw" where a trash chute came down through a drive lane (not illustrated on the plans). Additionally there were several steep speed ramps and numerous dead ends in the original approach. The new design improves all of these negatives (without steep speed ramps) while maintaining compliance with the City of Clearwater Parking Standards. We realize this will require careful review for approval. Fundamentally there are numerous minor changes made to the design from the approved plans, too many to list in a written form. All of these changes are due to either 3 dimensional "busts" or structural deficiencies in the initial design. If desired, we would be more than happy to sit down with you to further explain the differences. Sincerel 2t.an Men enhall 8, Karsky Architects • r c I ?• 9?,? ?? ?" / '? 1'/'? _ %y= + .-1rY??? ? ?. - Page 1 of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Jeff Mendenhall Umendenhall@collman-karsky.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 5:42 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: RE: 691 South Gulfview Blvd.- Enchantment Thanks Wayne- that's exactly what I needed to know. Jeff R. Mendenhall, AIA,Vice President, Architecture Coltman & Karsky Architects Full Service Architecture, Interior Design & Client Services 4301 Anchor Plaza Parkway, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33634 Phone: 813.884.2000, Fax: 813.884.0700 imendenhall@collman-karsky.com www.col I ma n-karsky.com From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 5:35 PM To: Jeff Mendenhall Subject: RE: 691 South Gulfview Blvd.- Enchantment Jeff - There is no document or checklist. We ask you to submit a letter of request for determination of Minor Revision, outlining the changes and similarities between what was approved by the Community Development Board and the revised plans, including the reasoning for such revisions. We additionally request at least one copy of all sheets being revised for our review. In many cases, it is the architect submitting the proposed revisions on architectural plans, knowing that the civil plans will need to be revised based on the Minor Revisions approved to be submitted for permitting purposes. There is no deadline to submit the Minor Revision, but its review timeframe may depend on what other projects have been submitted that are on a deadline basis (such as for completeness review, DRC review or CDB Staff Report). There is presently no fee for a Minor Revision. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Mendenhall [mailto:jmendenhall@collman-karsky.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 5:25 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: 691 South Gulfview Blvd.- Enchantment Wayne- Thanks for taking time to meet with us today to give us some direction on the Enchantment project. I realize you have your plate already full, and having to review a project all over again is going above the call of duty. We really appreciate your positive attitude and cooperation. I found Section 4-406, which describes changes to Level Two development approvals. The document doesn't describe the resubmittal process, but I understand the nature of the letter that you wish to have written. Is there a document that describes the formal procedure or requirements for the resubmission (like a checklist)? I just want to be certain that we get you all the information that you're looking for so we don't waste your time. Thanks in advance for your assistance! 6/6/2006 4 • • Page 2 of 2 Jeff R. Mendenhall, AIA,Vice President, Architecture Collman & Karsky Architects Full Service Architecture, Interior Design & Client Services 4301 Anchor Plaza Parkway, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33634 Phone: 813.884.2000, Fax: 813.884.0700 imendenhall(acollman-karsky.com www.collman-karsky.com 6/6/2006 Message 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Watkins, Sherry From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 4:10 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: Enchantment - FLD2005-06057 I would like to obtain a full-size copy of the approved architectural plans for the referenced project. (I haven't had any luck getting a copy from Rick Gillett.) Could you either send to Jiffy and then let me know the bill when they are ready OR let me borrow the plans, have them copied and return them the same day? Let me know what is best for you. If you send to Jiffy, Johnson Pope has an account there and I could call them about charging it to our account. Thanks Sherry. Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 10/11/2005 4 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CITY OF CLEARWATEA PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 October 5, 2005 Ms. Gina L. Canopari, Paralegal Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Case Nos. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Ms. Canopari: On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board approved the above referenced cases with 18 conditions of approval. The Flexible Development approval was for the construction of a maximum of 90 attached dwelling units. Condition #3 stated: "That application for a building permit shall be made within two years of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2007) and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit;" . The appeal period ended for the above reference cases yesterday, October 4, 2005, for those cases decided by the Community Development Board on September 20, 2005. There were no appeals filed for the above referenced cases. Should you have any additional questions, feel free to contact me at 562-4504. Sincerely, v ?I'VE- Wayne2Vl. Wells, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartnienllC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive at- Finisher! Applications lGulfview S 0691 Enchantment (T) - Approve&Letter of No Appeals 10.5.05.doc BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BILI.JONSONN, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFI'IRMAI'IVE ACTION EMPLOYER" n r 1 ? p;?05 iZ36txf ?S">` an CITY OF CLEARWATER -? `- PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6TE POST OFFICE Box 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 30, 2005 Mr. E. D. Armstrong 111, Esquire Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P. O. Box 1368 Clearwater, FL 33757-1368 RE: Development Order - Case Nos. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Dear Mr. Armstrong: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. The Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density per Section 6- 109; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal complies with the Transfer of Development Rights per Section 3-1403; 5. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 6. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYT HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER HILT. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACCION LMPLOYER" September 30, 2005 Armstrong - Page 2 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 3. That application for a building permit shall be made within two years of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2007) and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit; 4. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That the spa and private dining club be accessory uses for the exclusive use of residents and their guests; 6. That all appropriate civil and landscape plans be amended prior to the issuance of any permits to indicate the formal, wide stairs at the front of the building and that architectural plans provide adequate documentation to provide a minimum eight-foot, two-inch clearance at these formal, wide stairs in the garage area, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 7. That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 8. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 9. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 10. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 11. That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 12. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 13. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; September 30, 2005 Armstrong - Page 3 14. That a tree relocation plan for all trees rated #4 or greater be provided prior to the issuance of any permits; 15. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 16. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 17. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; and 18. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within the time frames listed above in Condition #3. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504. You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite! Sincerely, Mich lk, AIC Planning Director S:IPlanning DepartmenllC D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationsIGulfview S 0691 Enchantment (T) - ApprovedlGulfview S 691 Development Order. doc FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: Z FAX: +u7-- 03to IV Phone: +La l - k B FROM: Phone: DATE:_ RE: S. C'7 -.1 MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) Oct. 04 2005 01:51PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94620365 Oct.04 01:49PM 01158 SND 04 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). Message 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Jayne E. Sears [JayneS@jpfirm.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 12:06 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-06057 (691 S. Gulfview) The proposed conditions of approval are acceptable to the applicant and we would like to be on the consent agenda. Have you received any letters in opposition? Jayne E. Sears Legal Assistant Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: (727) 461-1818 Fax: (727) 462-0365 9/19/2005 • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 3:12 PM To: 'lindac@jpfirm.com' Subject: Staff Reports Linda - Attached are the Staff Reports for the following cases scheduled for the September 20, 2005, CDB meeting at 10:00 am: 1. FLD2005-07072 - 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard 2. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard 3. FLD2005-07068 - 401, 411 and 421 South Gulfview Boulevard Please let Ed Armstrong know that the attached Staff Report for 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard has been modified from an earlier version I sent to him the other day. Wayne Ina Gulfview S 655 Gulfview S 691 Gulfview S 401-421 Staff Report.do... Staff Report.do... Staff Repor... Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:48 PM To: E. D. Armstrong Esquire (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07072, 645-655 S. Gulfview Blvd. Ed - Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced project, scheduled for public hearing by the Community Development Board on September 20, 2005, at 10:00 am. Wayne Gulfview S 655 Staff Report.do... 0 ENGELHARDT, HAMMER & ASSOCIATES Planning • Engineering • Landscape Architecture TRANSMITTAL LETTER TO: Wayne Wells FROM: Ethel Hammer DATE: September 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Community Development Board Cases FLD2005-07068, FLD2005- 07072, FLD2005-06057 CC: Ed Armstrong xD Herewith D Under separate cover DESCRIPTION Dear Mr. Wells, D Via courier D Hand delivered At the direction of Ed Armstrong, representative for the above mentioned Flexible Development Applications, Engelhardt, Hammer & Associates has been asked to submit our analysis of the City of Clearwater Community Development Code criteria pertaining to these cases to allow for advance review by the Board. Please find enclosed (15) copies of said analysis for each case to distribute to all Community Development Board Members and other interested parties prior to the September 20, 2005 Community Development Board Hearing. We hope this will aid in the comprehensive review process. Should you require anything else or have any questions, please feel free to contact me at the number below. Sincerely, Ethel Hammer D Ecu"'E . SEP 13 2005 , PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY CG CLEARWATER ' 5444 Bay Center Drive, Suite 122, Tampa, FL 33609, Telephone 813 282-3855, Fax 813 286-2308 0 F C PLA_I\Il JWG DEPAR T ME I\I T POST OFFICE ox 4748, CLEARWATER, wRIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIP AI. SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYR FLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 F,,x (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PIANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 24, 2005 Mr. HOUSh Ghovaee Northside Engineering Services Inc. 601 Cleveland Street, Suite # 930 Clearwater, Florida 33755 Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case Nos. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023) Dear Mr. Ghovaee: The Case Nos. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 for (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005- 07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402, for property located at 691 South Gulfview Boulevard, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on September 20, 2005. The meeting will take place at 10:00 a.m. (note time of meeting) in the City Council Chambers, 31.6 floor of City Hall at 112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planner III S. IPianning DeparrmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending casesl Up for the next CDBIGuifview S 691 Enchantment (T) - 9.20.05 CDB - WW1Gu(fview S 691 CDB Letter. doc FRANK HIBBARD, IMAYOR BIIJ. JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DoRAN, COUNCILMEMBF.R I-IOYC H,\MII.ION, COUNCILNIPMBER CARLRN A. NiTF.RSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND APFIRMATIVI. ACI'iol; EMPLOYER" 1:00 PM Case Number: FLD2005-06057- 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Seawake Motel Ltd ORIGINAL 691 S Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, FI 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.459 acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 700 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. / Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconfomlity for density (110 existing overnight accommod on units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are per tted under t current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings wid ductions to the ?y V front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to ro feet (to trash .. 0/ staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to sidewalk) and from 10 feet XW' to three feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to ??'lll ??• sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of 1V•"T "_ l Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 1 ! ;y ?°7 '- 895SGulfviewBlvd ? ( TELEPHONE: 5304517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email u w } Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email PLANN!NG & C)( Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House CITY OF f:::." Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Development Review Agenda -Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 32 9 ORIGINAL f RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS ENCHANTMENT, LLC FLD2005-06057 - 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. GENERAL ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Apron for solid waste pick-up shall not extend beyond the northerly extension of the west property line of this development (revise plan prior to CDB). Response No. 1: See Sheet C3.1 for revision. Comment No. 2: The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. Response No. 2: F.D.C. has been located to conform to code. See Sheet C4.1. Comment No. 3: Inside drop into sanitary sewer manhole shall be compliant with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #302 page 3 of 3. Response No. 3: Acknowledged. Comment No. 4: Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f: [sidewalks to be constructed within this apron area shall also meet this standard]. Response No. 4: Acknowledged. Comment No. 5: A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). Response No. 5: Acknowledged. Comment No. 6: The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible, for all associated fees and all other installation fees. ??_ s? fe -, Response No. 6: Acknowledged. 2035 er.. C.3it%„ .. ._.. _. ORIGINAL Comment No. 7: Need to install at least one joint of ductile iron pipe on the service side of B.F.P.D. Response No. 7: See Sheet C4.1. Comment No. 8: Tie-in survey is required for all flat work (slab) prior to any vertical construction. Response No. 8: Acknowledged. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. ENVIRONMENTAL: Comment No. 1: Prior to CDB: Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. Response No. 1: Underground vault is being used due to the fact that the back of the property is beach property. Having retention along the only portion of the site where the pond will work is an obstruction to beach goers. Comment No. 2: In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. Response No. 2: Oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system detail is provided. Comment No. 3: Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Response No. 3: See details and cross-section of vault. Prior to Building Permit: Comment No. 4: A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. Response No. 4: Vault maintenance schedule is attached. AUG 1 9 2035 • • ORIGINAL Comment No. 5: Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit. (per Development Code; Section 3-1302-d and City Or.6928- 02) Response No. 5: Acknowledged. FIRE: Comment No. 1: ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Comment No. 2: Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA 241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. See notes on plans. Comment No. 3: Will there be any docks or piers for boats? If there are to be any dock or piers provide and show on the site plan a standpipe water supply with a 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cover and chain within 100 feet of any pier/land connection as per NFPA-303 PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 3 Comment No. 4: Response No. 4 Comment No. 5: AUG 1 1 2035 ? ? II _.f.SVCS C.I Ty No docks or piers for boats will be erected. The fire pump must be installed above BFE. Acknowledged. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using 3 0 0 ORIGINAL voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 5: Acknowledged. Comment No. 6: Fire Department Connections shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 '/2 feet in front and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 6: Signs have been indicated on Sheet C4.1. Comment No. 7: Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 7: See Sheet C4.1 for correct clearances. Comment No. 8: Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. Response No. 8: F.D.C. has been indicated per code. See Sheet C4.1. Comment No. 9: Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Response No. 9: Fire flow test has been ordered. HARBOR MASTER: No Comments. LEGAL: No Comments. f (J? al r A L13 s 2035 x? 4 . s a. ORIGINAL LAND RESOURCES: Comment No. 1: Recommend preserving or relocating, on site, all #4 or greater rated trees. Provide a relocation plan prior to building permit. Response No. 1: Removed trees (designated for relocation on the plan) will be staged at Butler's Nursery and relocated on the site. LANDSCAPING: Comment No. 1: Revise Sheet 1-1.1 - Coordinate the location of underground utilities with proposed landscaping, especially the FDA, FDC, DCVA and water meter to avoid landscaping being trampled and to minimize conflicts with fire personnel. Response No. 1: Sheet L1.1 has been revised. Comment No. 2: What landscape material is proposed on the south side of the property (sod?)? Indicate on Sheet 1-1.1 Response No. 2: See Sheet L.1.1 for south side of property plant materials. Comment No. 3: Sheet 1-1.1 - Revise: a. The following Common Name landscape materials are listed in the Landscape Table but are not indicated to be used on the site: Pigmy date palm (PR) and Wild date palm (PS). Response No. a: See Sheet 1-1.1 for corrected landscape table. b. In the Landscape Table the Code Name of PS is used twice, once for Wild date palm and also for Medjool palm. Response No. b: See Sheet L1.1 for corrected landscape table. c. On the landscape plan the following are specified, but are not listed in the Landscape Table: Royal Palm (RY), Sylvester Palm (SY) and Medjool (street tree) (DT). Response No. c: See Sheet L1.1 for corrected landscape table. PARKS AND RECREATION: Comment No. 1.• Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to t C' ? rrh rya ? . r:''3a issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and AUG 1 ? 2035 PLANNUNGr? ?T S`fCS • ORIGINAL it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562- 4824 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. STORMWATER: Comment No. 1: Site will not discharge freely as designed. The elevations at the discharge pipe appear to be below the existing grades. Please clarify. This area is subject to constant sediment transport, therefore, a simple sump will not be sufficient. Response No. 1 Comment No. 2: Response No. 2 Comment No. 3: Response No. 3 Comment No. 1: Response No. 1 SOLID WASTE: See revised Sheet C4.1. Provide drawdown calculations of vault. Drawdown calculations are attached. Provide volume requirement calculations of vault. All of the above prior to CDB. Calculation of vault has been attached. 1. Require SWFWMD Permit, and DEP Permit (possibly) prior to building permit. Acknowledged. Comment No. 1: How is solid waste and recycling handled? Response No. 1: Solid waste holding areas are provided (along with recycling containers) at each trash chute. Trash and recycling will be picked up on separate days. They will be rolled out for pick up. This has been coordinated with solid waste reviewer at the DRC meeting. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING: Comment No. 1: Provide safe and efficient vehicular movement where columns, walls, or other site conditions impede maneuverability or vision. Response No. 1: This has been provided including "set-in" columns at parking spaces. Mirrors will be installed as necessary and bollards will j 3 z r be placed around columns. F p? El l; 1 1 20JJ , ?J 6 • a ORIGINAL Comment No. 2: Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be a minimum of 87" to accommodate a H/C van. The entrance, route to H/C van space and exit must meet this requirement per ADA. Response No. 2: All parking/drive areas are 8'-2" minimum clearance. Comment No. 3: Canopy for porte-cochere must be 114" or 9.5' vertical clear height per ADAAG. Response No. 3: There is no canopy or porte-cochere. Comment No. 4: How does gate operate? Response No. 4: It is a 24' wide roll-up gate with 8'-2" clearance. Comment No. 5: 20' x 20' sight distance triangle must be shown on the landscape site plan. The triangles are measured from the property line and must be shown at all access entrances/driveways per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code Book). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. Response No. 5: See Sheet L1.1 for sight triangles. Comment No. 6: 6. Provide accessible route to elevators for each residential tower per Florida Accessibility Code 11-4.3(4). Response No. 6: This is provided and indicated on revised plans. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. PI ANNIN(;- Comment No. 1: Show or indicate the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening. Response No. 1: This is noted on plans, for mechanical equipment on roof and podium level. Comment No. 2: Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. Response, No. 2: Outdoor lighting has been located on Sheet C3.1. ,Ili 1`UU? \? ^^ J U ?l AUG 112u" ? ---? --....... ?.- _. 7 PLANNi;•IG C???tti?LCi't ''T svCSr1 • * ORIGINAL Comment No. 3: Curb each side of the driveway. Response No. 3: See Sheet C3.1 for curbing of driveway. Comment No. 4: A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted, but is unclear why it has been submitted, since the application does not indicate what landscaping requirements are being requested to be modified or waived. It does not appear that any landscaping requirements are being modified or waived, therefore, the Comprehensive Landscape Program application may be removed from the application material. Response No. 4: The proposed landscaping meets or exceeds Code. We withdraw the Comprehensive Landscape Program application. Comment No. 5: Elevations on Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 indicate the domed mechanical overrun on the highest tower to be 16 feet above the roof deck, however, the dimension line extended to the building indicates the domed mechanical overrun extends greater than 16 feet. Either reduce to the maximum allowed 16 feet or dimension the real height above the roof deck and include in the request. Response No. 5: This has been clarified on drawings and no additional height above 16' overrun is requested. Comment No. 6: Revise the request listed in Exhibit B to that indicated by Staff above. Response No. 6: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 7: Revise the first page of the application for "Parcel Size" to provide the square footage of Parcel 1 and the acreage for Parcel 2. Response No. 7: Noted and revised. Comment No. 8: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; Response No. 8: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 9: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff t A Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to ! w--- he proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits i+ ) or the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the ?,IF ?.? 1 2035 :i • • ORIGINAL abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall ---1 coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact EUA 1 20Y3 1 location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering : I S'JCS. Department prior to the commencement of work; PEA?Vt+it;? ? E?E apt. w.: +,. Response No. 9: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 10: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; Response No. 10: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 11: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; Response No. 11: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 12: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; Response No. 12: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 13: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Response No. 13: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 14: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; Response No. 15: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 15: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. Response No. 15: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. 9 • s ORIGINAL Comment No. 16: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That application for a building permit shall be made within two years of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2007) and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit; Response No. 16: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 17: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; Response No. 17: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 18: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument- style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; Response No. 18 Comment No. 19: I• _.R0 I ;? - i j AUG M35 SVCS Response No. 19: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 20: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Response No. 20: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. 10 9 0 ORIGINAL Comment No. 21: Unclear why the sidewalk on the west side of the building must be eight feet wide north of the trash room. What size dumpsters are being moved out to the staging area that requires this width? Why can't it be it be five feet wide? Also, unclear why the trash staging area is 12-foot wide by 28-foot deep. Is it the intention to have the trash truck enter the premises to dump the containers, therefore the size indicated, or will the truck sit in the right-of-way to dump the containers? If the latter, how many dumpsters are being placed out in the staging area? Response No. 21: The trash staging area remains as a 12-foot wide by 28-foot deep area and was designed as such for convenience of rolling out the containers for trash and recycling. The truck will not drive onto this area for pick up. The containers will be rolled out to the staging area and the truck will remain in the right-of-way while dumping the containers. Comment No. 22: Unclear why the entry sidewalk must be the size proposed at 15-foot wide. Response No. 22: For decorative pavers and a grand entrance. Comment No. 23: Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; Response No. 23: Noted and acceptable to the applicant. Comment No. 24: Sheet A2.02 indicates a formal, wide stairs in the front of s , the building from Level 2 down to the Level 1 (ground floor). These stairs start approximately 10 feet back from the ground level front wall and end approximately two feet I A ?I? j 1 ??`{? north of the adjacent elevator/lobby. ------I a. What effect does these stairs have on the Level 1 ?;?;YQ-7 C ? clearance for vehicles, since these stairs are at the main drive to the majority of the Level 1 parking (elevation indicates there is only 9'-4" from Level 1 to Level 2)? Response No. a: Stairs are modified for 8'-2" clearance in all garage areas. 11 • ORIGINAL b. These stairs conflict with the entry walkway shown on Sheet A2.01 and Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1, and are not shown on these other sheets. Revise. Response No. b: The stairs have been coordinated on all sheets and redrawn clear of walkway conflicts. Comment No. 25: Sheet A2.02 - In the Spa, why don't the men get lockers and a rain room? Response No. 25: Male and female areas have unique separate features for each consistent with projected use frequency and time allotted for use. Comment No. 26: Sheet A2.02 - Provide more information as to the "Private Dining Club" in writing (is this a restaurant, who can use it, is food prepared on-premises or catered in, etc.). Response No. 26: This area is completely catered on a reservation basis. No onsite food preparation is provided. It is for the exclusive use of residents and their guests. Comment No. 27: Sheet A2.02 - Is the terrace outside (north side) of the Spa is it there only for looks or is it meant to be accessible to the Spa (since no doors shown providing access)? Response No. 27: This is for the ambience of the spa and also to improve the articulation of the street elevation. Comment No. 28: Sheet A2.03 - Is the pool elevated above the Level 3 parking? Unclear as to effect on Level 2 parking. Advise. Response No. 28: Drawing includes a diagram section to explain this level. All 8'- 2" clearances are met in garage and accessible paths are provided. Comment No. 29: Stairs shown in the southeast and southwest corners of the parking levels on Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and A2.03 - how does one access these stairs, since adjacent parking spaces block access and there are no doors to access them? On Sheet A2.01, are the stairs intended to also be accessed from the inside (Level 1)? Response No. 29: No access from intermediate levels; it is not a life safety exit. It provides easier access from Level 3 to the beach only. AU 2 "0^5 P ly ` 'WMENT Svcs 12 • • ORIGINAL Comment No. 30: Sheet A2.02 - Unclear how there is to be a "two-story lobby" next to the private dining club, since there is a dwelling unit above and parking below. Advise/revise. Response No. 30: This is no longer a 2-story area and plans have been changed to reflect this. Comment No. 31: The Level 2 parking in the northeast and southeast portions will have a ceiling, which means there will be a floor/terrace on Level 2 outside of three dwelling units. However, it does not appear that these units have access to the top of the parking Level 2, only their defined "terraces." Unclear as to these extra areas outside of the dwelling units. Advise/revise. Response No. 31: This noted, units will have access and use of a portion of this area as a private terrace; the balance is for building use as some equipment is there. Comment No. 32: Sheet A2.04 - It is indicated that there are nine units by numbering, but I only count eight units per floor. Advise/revise. Response No. 32: This has been revised and corrected. Comment No. 33: Sheet A2.06 - Floor plans on the left hand side are sketchy and not well defined. Having trouble figuring out the penthouse with 2,173 square feet as to where and what all the rooms are for. Revise. Response No. 33: All floor plans have been corrected and additional detail provided. Comment No. 34: Provide a table on Sheet CM that lists, by floor (Levels 1- 15), the number of parking spaces and the number of dwelling units. Response No. 34 Comment No. 35: :1.16 11 M33 See Sheet C1.1 for parking/dwelling calculations per floor. As to the number of dwelling units, I count the following: Level 3 - 4 units Level 4 - 8 units Level 5 - 8 units Level 6 - 8 units Level 7 - 8 units Level 8 - 9 units Level 9 - 9 units 13 0 • ORIGINAL Level 10 - 9 units Level 11 - 9 units Level .12 - 9 units Level 13 - 9 units Level 14 - 5 units (townhouse counted on this level) Level 15 - 2 units Level 16 -1 unit This totals 98 units, whereas only 90 units are being requested in the application. How do we get eight more units in the building than allowed? Building Area Tabulations (8.5"x11") indicates that on Level 11 there are 7 units, Level 12 with 6 units and Level 13 with 6 units, however, floor plans submitted (see Sheet A2.05 for Levels 8-13) indicate 9 units per floor. No different floor plans for Levels 11, 12 and 13 have been submitted that shows less units. Response No. 35: There are 90 units only and the misleading graphics have been changed or deleted. Comment No. 36: Elevations provided on Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 are real sketchy, lacking in detail and are fuzzy, sometimes so dark it is difficult to read at all. Provide better elevations. Elevations also must provide information as to the exterior material and colors of the various elements of the exterior. Response No. 36: The drawings have been corrected and enhanced for clarity. Comment No. 37: Sheet A3.01 - There appears to be a gate indicated at the entrance to the parking at the building, however, there is none indicated on Sheet C3.1 nor A2.01. Advise/revise. Response No. 37: There is a full width gate shown and it is correct and intended. Comment No. 38: Sheets A3.02 and A3.04 - Indicate which "side" elevation these are as to "west" and "east" side elevations. Response No. 38: This is noted and clarified. 14 • i ORIGINAL Comment No. 39: There is an arch shown on Sheet A3.01 that is between Levels 2 and 4, yet this arch is indicated on Sheet A3.03 between Levels 1 and 3. Unclear if this a correct depiction or whether the arch was to be at the same levels. Advise/revise. Also, floor plans don't indicate any arch in this location. Response No. 39: This arch has been clarified on both elevations and its height is correct on each side. Comment No. 40: General Applicability criteria #1 - How is this proposed project in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent property to the west, which is an existing attached dwelling development? Response No. 40: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 41: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Address all reductions and increases listed by Staff in the "request" as to how this development would be otherwise impractical without the deviations. Response No. 41: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 42: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Address HOW this proposal will not reduce the value of abutting properties. Response No. 42: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 43: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Address HOW (in detail) this project is compatible with adjacent land uses. Response No. 43: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 44: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #1 - There are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District and another Planning comment questions why a Comprehensive Landscape Program (CLP) application has been filed. "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #3 See comment above re CLP. The Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) is 61Ld1 A yS ? j 26.4 IJ I not available for residential projects. Signage will need to meet Code requirements. Aren't all existing accessory 'L NNIN Q,"L + ..w z7 SVCS 15 • ORIGINAL. structures and signage being removed with this project? If so, include this in the response. "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #4 - See comment above under #3 regarding CLP and CSP. Response No. 44: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 45: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 - "Tower Separation" - What is the height of the Continental Towers building (you indicate less than 100 feet); provide the specific height (per Code from BFE). Response No. 45: See revised Exhibit "B". Comment No. 46: Accurately depict the location of the building above on the site plan Sheet C3.1 and on Sheet A2.01, including the terrace that cantilevers from the building. Concerned with the location of the balcony/terrace of the eastern portion of the building in relation to the required rear setback and the allowed encroachment into the setback by Section 3-908.13, which states: "Balconies, decks, bay windows, and similar features that linearly extend 50 percent or less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to extend into a required setback area not more than 24 inches provided through access is not obstructed." Show compliance with this requirement. If the balcony/terrace exceeds the allowance, then the increased encroachment must be included in the request as a reduction to the rear setback. Response No. 46: See Sheet C3.1 for 2nd story balcony dimensions. 18% dimensioning to 7% (50% allowed) of the beach side facade requires a setback of 12'-4 '/4' on the east and 18'-4 3/4' on the west. This setback is from a totally submerged in sand seawall, that requires no maintenance or repair because it is balanced and underground. A reduction in this setback for a very minor area is requested. ? FAUG 1 1 2035 16 0 0 ORIGINAL Comment No. 47: On 8.5"x11" colored drawings, one being the rear perspective elevation and the other being a detail of the pool area, these drawings indicate some paved surface on the water area, straddling the rear property line. Additionally, there are beach umbrellas/cabanas indicated on the beach area. These are both shown in areas not owned by the subject property. Perhaps this is not intended. Advise/revise. Response No. 47: The decorative design elements of umbrellas and cabanas are intended to be on the property of the owner in this submission. OTHER: No Comments 8/11/2005 11:14 AM 46069.109803 #352039 v1 - ENCHANTMENT/Response to Comments (FLD2005-0657) &Z PLANN;17 • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:22 AM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: FW: Draft DRC comments, 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Hit the send button too quick. -----Original Message----- From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:21 AM To: Doreen Williams (E-mail) Subject: Draft DRC comments, 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Doreen - As a courtesy, attached are the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced case, to be heard at 1:00 pm today. Wayne 0 draft 8.4.05 dre action agenda... • • Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 12:54 AM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: Revised Draft DRC comments for 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne - Attached are REVISED Draft DRC comments for the above project. I added to the request the deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, which you will need to add to your request and provide justification. Wayne draft 8.4.05 dre action agenda... Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 11:52 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: Draft DRC comments for FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023, 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne - Attached is the Draft DRC comments for the above reference project, to be heard at 1:00 pm on August 4, 2005. Wayne draft 8.4.05 dre action agenda... ° 0 CITY OF CLEO,RWATER Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W . MYC LEARW ATER. C OM July 07, 2005 E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 RE: FLD2005-06057 -- 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD -- Letter of Completeness Dear E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-06057. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 04, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Wayne Wells, AICP Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-06057 - 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 2:43 PM To: Jayne Sears (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-06057, 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Jayne - Letter of completeness attached. Wayne letter of )mpleteness 7.7.05., MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP Planning III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - 691 South Gulfview Boulevard DATE: May 9, 2008 Attached is information related to the request by Uday Lele, President, Enchantment, LLC, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 691 South Gulfview Boulevard. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on September 20, 2009. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions, increase in construction costs have required adjusting architectural construction drawings to reduce costs while maintaining a quality product and a necessary change in the architectural firm to produce architectural construction drawings. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4-407, the Planning Director has previously granted a one-year time extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments that would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affects this project: 1. Section 6-109.13 was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to dwelling unit density. Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order October 20, 2007 Maps and Photos S: (Planning DepartmentlCD. BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIGWview S 0691 Enchantment (7) -Approved; 5.20.08 CDB Time ExtlGulfview S 0691 Time Extension Memorandum for 5.20.08 CDB.doc • f Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 6:00 PM To: Fox, MaryJo Cc: Thompson, Neil Subject: 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. MaryJo - I just came from the above reference property and noticed the large signage on the property for the proposed redevelopment of the property (Enchantment). I see that you have cited them in Permit Plan and that it appears that a 32 square-foot (4 feet by 8 feet) real estate sign is going to be permitted (4/11/06 phone call to hotel management). What size is the current signage, which appears much greater than 32 square feet? If currently greater than 32 square feet, are they supposed to be removing part of the signage and by when (Permit Plan doesn't say anything)? Wayne • i Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 5:54 PM To: Faessler, Heather Cc: Delk, Michael; Thompson, Neil; Hall, Bob; Rice, Scott; Morris, William D.; Clayton, Gina Subject: Potential code enforcement issue at 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Heather - was made aware late Friday by a neighbor to the west of the subject property that there is sand being truck in, dumped and being pushed into the water at the southwest corner of the Best Western Seawake property at 691 South Gulfview Boulevard. The caller said they have been doing such for a couple of days. I visited the property late Sunday afternoon and there does appear to be evidence of such activity that has occurred. There appears a part of a palm tree that has been pushed to the water's edge. I did not see any trucks or bulldozer on the property, but there are bulldozer tracks in the west portion of the parking lot. This property has been approved by the Community Development Board for redevelopment for the Enchantment project, a new 90-unit condominium project. There are no plans in for permitting at this point in time. I would note that the project is being advertised in many publications as having "approximately 250 feet of ABSOLUTE PRIVATE BEACHFRONT property where the azure waters of the Gulf of Mexico wash up on our sandy beach" (capitalization in the advertisement). I have had one gentleman in looking at the plans for both this project and the Sunspree property to the east at 715 South Gulfview Boulevard (and has obtained copies of the pertinent surveys). While Enchantment's advertisement says one thing, the property only owns to a point on the beach (not out into the water). The reason the gentleman was questioning the advertisement is because he is a boater who frequents the area and stated that he wants to be legal (ie: not on private property) when they go up onto the beach (regarding both properties). Could you please check this out? If you are not the proper person, please let me know. Also, please let me know of any results of any investigation. Thanks. Wayne 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:23 PM To: 'MTwitty@RealtyDecisions.com' Subject: RE: Enchantment & Indigo Beach Mike - These projects are not based on gross and saleable building floor area, but rather on the number of dwelling units and/or the number of overnight accommodation units/rooms. 1. Enchantment - Approved for 90 dwelling units. 2. Indigo Beach - Approved for 112 dwelling units and 78 overnight accommodation units/rooms. I hope this answers your questions. Wayne -----Original Message----- From: Michael Twitty [maiIto: mtwitty@realtydecisions.com] Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:24 AM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: Enchantment & Indigo Beach Hi Wayne & Happy New Year, I'm currently working on construction loan appraisals for several of the south Clearwater Beach projects. I was wondering if you are in receipt of the gross and saleable building areas permissible or approved within the following two projects: 1) Enchantment 2) Indigo Beach Thank you, Mike Michael T. Twitty State-Certified General Appraiser 1723 Vice President Entreken Associates, Inc. 1100 16th Street N St. Petersburg, FL 33705 Phone: (727) 894-1800 ext. 203 Fax: (727) 894-8916 Cell: (727) 504-5188 1/18/2006 Message Pagel of 2 Wells, Wayne From: Gina L. Canopari [ginac@jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:04 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Steven A. Williamson; Ed Armstrong Subject: RE: Enchantment/Uday Lele Thanks. Once you have everything completed, you can fax it to me or Ed Armstrong at 441-8617. The closing will be here in our offices Wednesday morning (10/5) at 10:00am. Thanks for your help Wayne. Gina L. Canopari, Paralegal Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 727-441-8617 Fax -----Original Message----- From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com] Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 9:58 AM To: Gina L. Canopari Subject: RE: Enchantment/Uday Lele It is in to Neil to look at prior to Michael' signature. The letter is dated for today. There is another letter that they are requesting that there have been no appeals filed (lender is requesting such letter). Obviously, since the appeal period ends October 4, 2005, the letter has to be dated October 5, 2005. 1 have told them I will work with them on the second letter. -----Original Message----- From: Gina L. Canopari [mailto:ginac@jpfirm.com] Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 8:47 AM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Steven A. Williamson Subject: RE: Enchantment/Uday Lele Wayne, also just found out that Uday's lender needs to see the Development Order, so you were correct yesterday on our phone call. Please let me know when you anticipate having it completed. Thanks. Gina L. Canopari, Paralegal Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 727-441-8617 Fax -----Original Message----- From: Gina L. Canopari 11/27/2005 Me4age Page 2 of 2 i i Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:37 AM To: 'wayne.wells@myclearwater.com' Cc: Steven A. Williamson Subject: Enchantment/Uday Lele Mr. Wells, Per our conversation, it looks like we just need a letter that states (this is directly from Intervest Bank, Uday's lender), that there were no appeals during the appeal period and "Enchantment, LLC has the ability as a vested right to construct at least 90 residential condominium units on the Property" Let me know if this will be a problem. We are set to close at 10:am on 10/5. Thanks. Gina L. Canopari, Paralegal Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP 911 Chestnut Street Clearwater, FL 33756 727-461-1818 727-441-8617 Fax 11/27/2005 ORIGINAL CDB Meeting Date: September 20, 2005 Case Numbers: FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 Agenda Item: G9 Owner: Seawake Motel, Ltd Applicant: Enchantment, LLC Representative: Mr. E. D. Armstrong 1, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP Address: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) and Open Space/Recreation (OS/R) Districts; Residential LAND USE: Facilities High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: 1.459 acres (1.359 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.100 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodation use of 110 rooms/units • Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (90 condominiums) Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 1 of 12 • ADJACENT ZONING/ LAND USES: CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: North use East: South West: 0 Tourist District; Retail sales and overnight accommodation Tourist District; Overnight accommodation use Open Space/Recreation and Preservation Districts; Water Tourist District; Attached dwellings The surrounding area is tourist-dominated area with a mixture of attached dwellings (condominium), overnight accommodation uses and tourist-oriented commercial uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 1.459 total acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 700 feet west of Gulf Boulevard, including 1.359 acres zoned Tourist District and 0.100 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District. The site has 241 feet of frontage on South Gulfview Boulevard. The site is currently developed with the six-story, 110- room Best Western Sea Wake Inn overnight accommodation use. The existing building is located toward the rear of the site, oriented east/west and with parking on the north and west sides of the building. Property to the east is presently developed with overnight accommodation use, but has been approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) to be redeveloped with two 150-foot tall residential towers with 149 attached dwelling units (condominiums) (Cases FLD2005- 01016/TDR2005-01017/PLT2005-00002, approved April 19, 2005). The parcel to the west is developed with an attached dwelling building of 12 stories (Continental Towers). The property at 645-655 South Gulfview Boulevard west of Continental Towers is on this same CDB agenda to redevelop that property with 68 attached dwellings in a building 99.5 feet in height. Properties to the north between South Gulfview Boulevard and Bayway Boulevard are retail sales uses oriented toward tourists and a time-share development (overnight accommodation use). An application has been filed, but not yet reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) to redevelop the majority of the site presently developed with the time-share use as a mixed use of retail and restaurant uses and condominiums. Properties north of Bayway Boulevard have been redeveloped, or been approved to be redeveloped, as attached dwellings. Proposal: The proposal includes the complete demolition of all existing site improvements for the existing six-story, 110-room/unit Best Western Sea Wake Inn and the construction of a new 16- story residential building of 90 dwelling units. The new building is designed to have a distinctive Art Nuevo appearance within classical proportions and articulation. The residential building is situated on a podium two to three stories in height providing garage parking for the dwellings. The lower residential levels of the building are oriented generally on a north/south basis, but when connected beginning at the eighth level forms an east/west orientation. The existing decks south of the seawall and south property line will be removed. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 2 of 12 0 0 The proposal includes a request to Terminate the Status of the Nonconformity for the nonconforming density for the existing 110-room/unit overnight accommodation use on the property. Based on current Land Use Category density .limitations of 30 units/rooms per acre for dwellings, the overall subject site may be redeveloped with a maximum of 40 dwelling units. The applicant is requesting to terminate the nonconforming density in order to demolish the existing overnight accommodation use, converting this overnight accommodation density on a 40/30 conversion factor to'82 dwelling unit (plus an additional eight dwelling units through the Transfer of Development Rights [TDRs] for a total of 90 dwelling units - see discussion below regarding TDRs). Under the Termination of Status of Nonconformity provisions, there are four required improvements: 1. Installation of perimeter buffers. Perimeter buffers are not required in the Tourist District. 2. Improvement of off-street parking lots. The applicant is removing all existing improvements and is providing parking that exceeds Code provisions in the three levels of the parking garage. 3. Removal of nonconforming signs, outdoor lighting or other accessory structures. The applicant is removing all existing improvements. Any future signage will need to meet current Code provisions. 4. Use of Comprehensive Sign gram and Comprehensive Landscape Programs to satisfy requirements. The Comprehensive Sign Program is not available under the Code to residential properties. The Comprehensive Landscape Program is unnecessary. The Code provisions of Sections 6-109.B and C require Level Two approval of the Termination of Status of Nonconformity and reconstruction complying with all other Code requirements. The proposal is to demolish the existing overnight accommodation use and construct a residential building with 14 living floors over garage level parking (there are two levels of parking within the podium of the building, with a third level on the west side of the building). The site has been designed with the building meeting the required front (north - 15 feet), side (east and west - 10 feet) and rear (20 feet) setbacks. The proposal includes reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet (to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies). With regard to the front setback reduction related to the trash staging area, the building will have refuse collection rooms on the ground floor within the parking garage. Dumpsters will be rolled out to the staging area on collection days. The location of the trash staging area within the front setback is necessary to eliminate the necessity of the trash truck coming on-site and is common with many newer developments. The proposal includes a side (west) setback reduction to three feet for the trash staging area, which is adjacent to covered parking at the Continental Towers development to the west. In concert with the formal front stairs to the second level podium with its sculpture garden, fountain and waterfall, the proposal includes a grand entry sidewalk from South Gulfview Boulevard at a minimum of seven feet at its closest edge near an elevator lobby. The majority of the front setback is being lushly landscaped, including a fountain between the angled portions of Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 3 of 12 the entry sidewalk. A sidewalk along the western edge of the building, providing pedestrian access from the front to the rear of the site meets the required side (west) setback of 10 feet. With regard to the rear (south) setback reductions, a stair cascades from the third level pool area down the rear of the building to allow residents access to the beach area. A five-foot wide sidewalk provides access from a garage stairwell at the southeast corner of the building to the sidewalk along the west side of the building. The setback reduction to 15.7 feet is to allow this rear sidewalk to go around this cascading stair. The building meets the required 20-foot rear setback at the southeast corner of the building from the zoning boundary line (there is a property extension approximately 60 feet wide in the southeast corner zoned Open Space/Recreation District). The building is located 34 feet from the rear property line at the southwest corner. Levels 3 - 12 have been designed with a cantilevered terrace for the rear units at a 1.4-foot setback on the east side. The reduction at this location will not be perceptible due to the balconies starting at the third level, the additional property zoned OS/R and their location to a small beach. The requested flexibility in regard to required setbacks to primarily non-building structures are justified by the benefits to an upgraded site appearance to the surrounding area and to the City as a whole for both buildings and landscaping. The front and side areas of this proposal will be lushly landscaped with a variety of trees, shrubs and groundcovers. A fountain is planned between the entry sidewalk to the formal stairs to the second level podium and South Gulfview Boulevard. The landscape plan provides royal palms, Christmas palms, foxtail palms, date palms, Washington palms, sabal palms and oleander trees grouped between the building and property lines. Medjool palms are planned within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way, which will need to be coordinated with the City's Beach Walk improvement plans. Shrubs and groundcover of petite pink oleander, arboricola, bougainvillea, xanadu, silver buttonwood, dwarf blue lily of nile and parsomi juniper will otherwise fill these setback areas. The rear area is planned as an extension of the beach with white sand. The proposal is to construct a new building of 16-stories at a height increase to 150 feet to the highest roof deck. This height complies with the Tourist District, the Transfer of Development Rights provisions and Beach by Design. The Continental Towers Condominiums to the west is a 12-floor building oriented east/west, at a height of 94.7 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE). The Sunspree project to the east at 715 South Gulfview Boulevard has been approved by the CDB with two residential buildings, each at a height of 150 feet. The tops of the elevator towers are proposed 16 feet above the roof deck (the maximum permitted by Code). Section'4-1403.C authorizes building height increases up to 1.5 times the maximum height otherwise permitted (maximum of 100 feet permitted in the Tourist District; 1.5 times produces a height of 150 feet, which is the proposal). Since the Sunspree project has already been approved with a building height of 150 feet, no portion of the proposed building above 100 feet can be closer than 100 feet to the Sunspree building. The design of this building is stepped on the east side at a maximum height of 100 feet to accomplish this separation requirement. There will be no more than two buildings exceeding 100 feet in height within 500 feet of each other. There is also a reasonable relationship between the number of units transferred and the increased building height. This unique building has been designed with view corridors through the incorporation of a center "arch" 68 feet high in the center of the project, allowing views through the lower levels of the building. The scale and mass of the building has been reduced through rounded edges of the Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 4 of 12 building and the step backs from the parking level podiums and on various levels of the building. The proposal is compatible with adjacent land uses, consistent in use with the existing attached dwellings to the west and with the proposed attached dwellings to the east and in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage and character of adjacent properties. As mentioned previously, the proposed building is designed with Art Nuevo architecture. The two and. three story podium provides access to building lobbies, a sculpture garden, a private dining club, spa and pool area. The pool area is located on a half level (2.5) at the rear of the building. A waterfall on the northern edge of the pool level provides visual interest to passersby via the formal stairs from ground level. Many edges of the proposed building are curved, reducing the real and perceived mass of the building. The residential "tower" portions of the building are set back a minimum of 35 feet from the front property line and have step backs at higher levels. There are four dwellings, ranging in size from 1,971 to 3,219 square feet in area, on the third level on the eastern portion of the building. The area above the second level parking will provide terraces for the units on Level 3. Levels 4 and 5 are designed with a total of nine dwellings, ranging in size from 1,100 to 3,219 square feet in area. There are a total of eight dwellings on Levels 6 and 7, ranging in size from 1,971 to 3,219 square feet in area. Levels 8 - 10 are designed with a total of nine dwellings, ranging in size from 1,971 to 3,219 square feet, with units bridging between the lower levels of the building forming the arch below. There are seven dwellings on Level 11, with units ranging from 2,322 to 3,219 square feet in area. Levels 12 and 13 are designed with five dwellings ranging in size from 2,173 to 3,129 square feet in area. Level 14 is designed with four dwellings ranging in size from 2,173 to 3,129 square feet in area. Levels 14 and 15 embrace a two-story townhouse of a total of 3,920 square feet. There are two dwellings on Level 15, one of 3,461 square feet and the other of 4,792 square feet. Level 16 only has a 3,675 square feet dwelling on the east side of the building. This proposal provides parking on three levels with a total of 180 parking spaces (two spaces per unit). Ninety parking spaces are provided on the ground level under the building. There are 57 parking spaces on Level 2, wrapping around the east, west and south edges of the building. Thirty- three parking spaces are provided on Level 3 on the west side of the building only. A small portion of the parking garage building is located within the sight visibility triangle on the eastern side of the driveway, but is not anticipated to cause driver issues with vehicular or pedestrian visibility when exiting the site. The criteria for attached dwellings prohibit direct access to an arterial street. South Gulfview Boulevard is an arterial street. The site has no other means of street access and the proposal provides driveway access to it, much as the existing overnight accommodation use presently has driveway access to this site. The application has been advertised with a Transfer of Development Rights of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive. The number of units being transferred to this site represents the maximum of 20 percent of the permitted number of dwelling units based on 30 units per acre (40 dwellings). The proposal is in compliance with the criteria of Section 4-1403 for the Transfer of Development Rights. There is a reasonable relationship between the additional height above 100 feet and the number of units above 100 feet. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 5 of 12 A new sidewalk 10 feet in width will be constructed within the right-of-way along South Gulfview Boulevard. This sidewalk should be constructed consistent with the standards developed for the Beach Walk improvements in terms of design and landscaping. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. It is noted that the Code does not provide the ability to request a Comprehensive Sign Program for a residential property. Future signage will need to meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign would need to be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Section 2- 803.C) have been met. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 6 of 12 COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 90 dwelling units (a) X** DENSITY (40 rooms/units per acre; 30 dwelling units per acre) (54 rooms/units or 40 dwellings maximum)* IMPERVIOUS 0.74 X SURFACE RATIO ISR) (0.95) LOT AREA (5,000 - 1.459 acres total (1.359 acres zoned T; X 10,000 s q. feet) 0.100 acres zoned OS/R) LOT WIDTH (50-100 241.24 feet X feet FRONT SETBACK 15 feet (to building) X (0-15 feet) REAR SETBACK 20 feet (to building), 15.7 feet ( to X** (10-20 feet) sidewalk) and 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies) SIDE SETBACK East: 15 feet (to building) X** (0-10 feet) West: 15 feet (to building), 10 feet (to sidewalk) and three feet (to trash staging area) HEIGHT (35-100 feet 150 feet (to roof deck) X** maximum) PARKING SPACES 190 spaces X (1.5 spaces per unit; 135 spaces required) (a) Includes the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for 110 existing overnight accommodation rooms/units, to be converted on a 40/30 ratio to 82 dwelling units, plus eight dwelling units through the Transfer of Development Rights. * Number of rooms/units allowed based on 1.359 acres zoned Tourist District. ** See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 7 of 12 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.C): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 8 of 12 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STANDARDS (Section 4-1403): Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development of the parcel proposed for development will not X reduce the fair market value of abutting property. 2. The uses within the project are otherwise permitted in the City of X Clearwater. 3. The uses or mix of uses within the project are compatible with X adjacent land uses. 4. The development of the parcel proposed for development will X upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 5. The design of the proposed project creates a form and function which X enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The subject 1.459 total acres (1.359 acres zoned Tourist District; 0.100 acres zoned Open Space/Recreation District) is located within the Clearwater Pass District of Beach by Design; 2. The current use of the site is for a 110-room hotel (which is nonconforming to current density maximums of 54 rooms or 40 dwelling units); 3. The proposal includes the demolition of the existing hotel building and all existing site improvements; 4. The proposal includes a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity to allow the conversion of 110 overnight accommodation units/rooms to 82 dwelling units; 5. The applicant is requesting the Transfer of Development Rights of eight dwelling units to this site, for a total proposed number of dwellings of 90 units; 6. The proposed building meets the required setbacks. Setback reductions are primarily to non-building structures; 7. The proposed building height of 150 feet for the residential tower bears a reasonable relationship between the number of units being transferred through the Transfer of Development Rights and the proposed height; 8. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development, and will enhance the character of the immediate vicinity; and 9. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 9 of 12 0 0 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Staff concludes that the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density complies with the criteria of Section 6-109; 2. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; 4. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Transfer of Development Rights per Section 3-1403; 5. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 6. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this application. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL for the (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development application to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk) and from 20 feet to 14 feet (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402, for the site at 691 South Gulfview Boulevard with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with the Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density per Section 6-109; 2. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Section 2-803.C; 3. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913; 4. The proposal complies with the Transfer of Development Rights per Section 3-1403; 5. The proposal complies with Beach by Design; and 6. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 -Page 10 of 12 0 0 Conditions of Approval: 1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 3. That application for a building permit shall be made within two years of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2007) and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit; 4. That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 5. That the spa and private dining club be accessory uses for the exclusive use of residents and their guests; 6. That all appropriate civil and landscape plans be amended prior to the issuance of any permits to indicate the formal, wide stairs at the front of the building and that architectural plans provide adequate documentation to provide a minimum eight-foot, two-inch clearance at these formal, wide stairs in the garage area, prior to the issuance of the building permit; 7. That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 8. That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 9. That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 10. That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 11. That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 12. That any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height and be designed to match the exterior materials and colors of the building; 13. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 11 of 12 • 0 location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 14. That a tree relocation plan for all trees rated #4 or greater be provided prior to the issuance of any permits; 15. That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 16. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits; 17. That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; and 18. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff- UWr,4_ Wayne . Wells, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S.IPlanning DepartrtentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseslUp for the next CDBIGulfview S 69/ Enchantment (T) - 9.20.05 CDB - WWIGulfview S 691 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 - Page 12 of 12 0 • `NNOWABD p E mq Q TFpgp 9. ? Y ? y i O O T 3y 4y c 8 M evt WATER OR F1 a V BAYSIDE QP BLVD s? Aa ss PROJECT SITE 0 0 0 Location Map Owner. Seawake Motel, Ltd. Cases: FLD2005-06057 TDR2005-07023 Site: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 1.359 PIN: 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 Atlas Page: 285A • • v ^ h ? h - - - - - - - - - - - - / j _ a \ 1 1 1 1 • ? 715 j i ' j r 1 r I-? 55 , P 1 Zoning Map Owner. Seawake Motel, Ltd. Cases: FLD2005-06057 TDR2005-0 7023 Site: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1 359 Size(Acres): . PIN: 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 Atlas Page: 285A • he ' -' , q -- %?- , y .- - , -X_ I & at q e? t le. i --dvirnit -? -_ r I; l ---- thod4ionv' , b il F R t e a es ??_etafil Over?gh>` ? '-?-- , r,f,_ , .,, ? ? ? Q » -? 12ejtail Malec-i acc, b]P --; 04 tions t,- YS hi . ell --__ - -?- $ ti - Attached s GU r C ___ - ; dwe-Itings 'ABC VD -- L Z /y - ---Qvernight c ace r -I t r 715 _ j I , 551 1 I -J !,-_i rte, Q J Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Seawake Motel, Ltd. Cases: FLD2005-06057 TDR2005-07023 Site: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Property 1 359 Size(Acres): . PIN: 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 Atlas Page: 285A 0 0 ?• ag r 1 IY4. v . r ! ti' / d 4 1 J r J J Aerial Map Owner: Seawake Motel, Ltd. Cases: FLD2005-06057 TDR2005-07023 Site: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 1.359 PIN: 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 Atlas Page: 285A sl*1'r View looking south at subject property t? F1 r, ?j View looking south at property to the east (presently overnight accommodations; approved for attached dwellings) £ j . sP 3. ,?? I a View looking southwest at attached dwellings to the west of subject property View looking south at north property line of subject property with attached dwellings to the west 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Page 1 of 2 FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 err ?,,,, an ir. ? .nn.- ct View looking northwest at Walgreens west of 678 S. Gulfview Blvd. 691 South Gulfview Boulevard FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 is Page 2 of 2 View looking northeast at retail sales at 700 S. Gulfview Blvd. View looking north at overnight accommodations at 678 S. Gulfview Blvd Conditions Associated With FLD2005-06057 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Fire Condition James Keller 562-4327 07/29/2005 Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. 07/29/2005 Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 727-562-4741 07/25/2005 Recommend preserving or relocating, on site, all #4 or greater rated trees. Provide a relocation plan prior to building permit. Parks & Recs Condition Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Solid Waste Condition Tom Glenn How is solid waste and recycing handled 562-4930 Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; Print Date: 09/13/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 I 1 0 • FLD2005-06057 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That application for a building permit shall be made within two years of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2007) and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 08/03/2005 Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 08/03/2005 9/13/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in Staff Report. 8/3/05 - WW Sheet A2.02 indicates a formal, wide stairs in the front of the building from Level 2 down to the Level 1 (ground floor). These stairs start approximately 10 feet back from the ground level front wall and end approximately two feet north of the adjacent elevator/lobby. a. What effect does these stairs have on the Level 1 clearance for vehicles, since these stairs are at the main drive to the majority of the Level 1 parking (elevation indicates there is only 9'-4" from Level 1 to Level 2)? b. These stairs conflict with the entry walkway shown on Sheet A2.01 and Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1, and are not shown on these other sheets. Revise. 08/03/2005 9/13/05 - WW Not Met Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report. 8/3/05 - WW CaseConditons Print Date: 09/13/2005 Page 2 of 3 FLD2005-06057 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504 Sheet A2.02 - Provide more information as to the "Private Dining Club" in writing (is this a restaurant, who can use it, is food prepared on-premises or catered in, etc.). 08/03/2005 9/13/05 - WW Not Met Not included in the request. 8/3/05 - WW Accurately depict the location of the building above on the site plan Sheet C3.1 and on Sheet A2.01, including the terrace that cantilevers from the building. Concerned with the location of the balcony/terrace of the eastern portion of the building in relation to the required rear setback and the allowed encroachment into the setback by Section 3-908.D, which states: "Balconies, decks, bay windows, and similar features that linearly extend 50 percent or less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to extend into a required setback area not more than 24 inches provided through access is not obstructed." Show compliance with this requirement. If the balcony/terrace exceeds the allowance, then the increased encroachment must be included in the request as a reduction to the rear setback. Print Date: 09/13/2005 CaseConditons Page 3 of 3 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Kambourolias, Sam Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:59 PM To: Wells, Wayne Cc: Watkins, Sherry Subject: FLD2005-06057 I DID zone.doc location.doc FLD Map request existing.doc aerial.doc form.doc Soto Kambourolias CAD Technician City Of Clearwater (727) 562-4769 9 10 ?tVir N NAM ELAM A, TACTIT 72/02 t 1p 17 18 NO 00?01, P CIEMi • /1 I 24 3 I 73 7 ° yF 2 1? p72 3 21 'i1r ''rr'?If g70 fq N 6 I I 5 d 16 I ° ? `p 17 a I g CONVNM 11 TOWERS I CONDO 8-e I 'err' 6 17 I C7 I I P 1 Iii s .P, 7f'l3Gj ii ;SAND KEY COUNTY PARK OS/R i t_? 23/01 14 -- N 2768 ? CITY OF CLEARWATER a i %VF' P=LIB t FI =A PREPARED RY . PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION BR ENCWEERINC nQC too i wrle Ave., geaeater, tl 33756 c_ Ph. (6131762-.750. for (813526-4755 s Mtp:,/efe.eleafatfr-Qca /"glo r/ piMdmM. D Puale intanotbn data Is lllfaifned by the Pty of Clmwter Puak Wals Admllrl " 9 1"ewM¢ and molt ore *-Pted An ' fl .. , and used by IM rskknl lM undafladMq that- IM data fee~ vof ad*dtd Iw tM Pupate of d"opl.q o gmtk Inhostrvetun Inventory. As sues, IM City of Ciesu fha PWAA makes no WMallse, expressed a "fed. conamMq IM ac-y. CaaplelerlefA rellabWly, or rvlla6sRy WIN data fa any other palkula use. iwlhe.mae, IM C", of Ckarwoler PWA/E oseumes as IInbslly uhotso- assedoled with tM ufe 8 a mIssss , fulh data. ; NMI 7 This hllas pegs M s to pModk Menges. fa Infamallon about latest re 10-1 please eos PWA/E a C f 'lilt m Web file. i A ' r I ; i 6 1 2 1: 0 too 200 490 690 SCALE: 1' . AOV $ o LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER N CIO 1234 LOT ADDRESS co ----- CITY LIMITS LINE R:.,^1 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS 0 A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR MNINO DESIGNATION seW ZONE LINE f m •x6 m/o7A+ S I REVISED: 76p 03/08/99 ' ZONING ATLAS - SE C "7 - 29 S - E 285A 40 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 12:31 PM To: Kambourolias, Sam Cc: Herman, Jason Subject: Map Request for 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. Sam - Attached is a map request for Cases FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 for the property at 691 S. Gulfview Blvd. I will bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep. Thanks- Wayne fff, 71 FLD Map request form.doc 9 0 Flexible Development Application - Map Request Planner Name: Wayne Wells Case Number: FDL2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 Date Requested: August 20, 2005 Date Requested for (date): September 2, 2005 Maps Requested x? Location Map x? Aerial Map x? Zoning Map x? Existing Surrounding Uses Map Required Documents to be submitted to Engineerin g x? Legal Description x? Survey x? Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Map Name Owner: Seawake Motel, Ltd. i Cases: FLD2005-06057 FLD2005-07023 Site: 691 South Gulfview Boulevard Property Size(Acres): 1.459 PIN: 17/29/15/05004/003/0160 Atlas Page: 285A 9 0 G-u-(P7 '/e 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Rice, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:33 PM To: Wells, Wayne Subject: FLD2005-06057 - 691 S Gulfview Wayne, Engineering review complete on subject application and Permit Plan updated. Only approval condition would be payment of TIF prior to CO. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com 0 0 Wells, Wayne From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:37 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Cc: DRC Members Subject: RE: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB Revised and updated PP as needed. 655 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 1770 Drew- Conditions met. 401 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 342 Hamden- No Issues. 691 Gulfview- Condition to be met at building permit. 706 Bayway- No Issues. 475 East Shore- Condition met. 1460 Missouri- No Issues. 1200 Betty Ln- No Issues. 566 Bay Esplanade- Conditions met. 229 Coronado- Condition to be met at building permit. 621 Bay Esplanade- No Issues. 600 Pennsylvania- ?????? 1242 Cleveland- Revised condition to be met at building permit. -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB The following cases have been resubmitted from prior DRC meetings. Prior to being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting agenda, please come by our office and review the following cases based on your comments on Permit Plan. If the revisions are acceptable, meaning that from your standpoint it may be scheduled for the CDB, or if there are still outstanding comments that would prevent it from being scheduled for CDB, please let the case planner know. Please review the following cases by end of the day tomorrow, August 17, 2005. Thanks. 655 S Gulfview Blvd FLD2005-07072 1770 Drew Street - FLD2005-06054 401 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-07068 342 Hamden Drive - FLD2005-07066 691 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-06057 706 Bayway Blvd - FLD2005-07070 .475 East Shore Drive - FLD2005-06056 1460 S Missouri Avenue - FLD2005-08039 1200 N Betty Lane - FLD2005-07063 566 Bay Esplanade Avenue - FLD2005-07065 229 Coronado Drive - FLD2005-07061 621 Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07064 600 Pennsylvania Avenue - FLD2005-06055 1242 Cleveland Street - FLD20(*058 • 0 • Wells, Wayne From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM To: DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Resubmittals from DRC desiring to be on the 9/20/05 CDB The following cases have been resubmitted from prior DRC meetings. Prior to being scheduled for the 9/20/05 CDB meeting agenda, please come by our office and review the following cases based on your comments on Permit Plan. If the revisions are acceptable, meaning that from your standpoint it may be scheduled for the CDB, or if there are still outstanding comments that would prevent it from being scheduled for CDB, please let the case planner know. Please review the following cases by end of the day tomorrow, August 17, 2005. Thanks. 655 S Gulfview Blvd FLD2005-07072 1770 Drew Street - FLD2005-06054 401 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-07068 342 Hamden Drive - FLD2005-07066 J691 S Gulfview Blvd - FLD2005-06057 706 Bayway Blvd - FLD2005-07070 475 East Shore Drive - FLD2005-06056 1460 S Missouri Avenue - FLD2005-08039 1200 N Betty Lane - FLD2005-07063 566 Bay Esplanade Avenue - FLD2005-07065 229 Coronado Drive - FLD2005-07061 621 Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07064 600 Pennsylvania Avenue - FLD2005-06055 1242 Cleveland Street - FLD2005-06058 0 ?% 1 1 0 4 0 1:00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-060 / -- 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Seawake Motel Ltd V.46olp 691 S Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.459 acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 700 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to sidewalk) and from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 28 Attendees Included: City Stalf: Wells, Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickard, }mill Buzzell , Applicant/Rep: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, Rick Gillette, Uday Lele, Bashan, Joe Burdette, Ed Hooper, Renee Ruggerio, Ron Belko Other: Aaron Sharockman The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , 1. Apron for solid waste pick-up shall not extend beyond the northerly extension of the west property line of this development (revise plan prior to CDB). The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 2. Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. 3. Inside drop into sanitary sewer manhole shall be compliant with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #302 page 3 of 3. 4. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f. [sidewalks to be constructed within this apron area shall also meet this standard]. 5. A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 6. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 7. Need to install at least one joint of ductile iron pipe on the service side of B.F.P.D. 8. Tie-in survey is required for all flat work (slab) prior to any vertical construction. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 . Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. 5.Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit. (per Development Code; Section 3-1302-d and City Or.6928-02) Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 29 I , ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUVORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. . 2. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Will there be any docks or piers for boats? If there are to be any dock or piers provide and show on the site plan a standpipe water supply with a 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cover and chain within 100 feet of any peir/land connection as per NFPA-303 PRIOR TO CDB. 4. The fire pump must be installed above BFE. 5 , This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Fire Department Connections shal be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be aintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. 9. Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: I . No issues. Land Resources: I , Recommend preserving or relocating, on site, all #4 or greater rated trees. Provide a relocation plan prior to building permit. Landscaping: l . Revise Sheet L1.1 - Coordinate the location of underground utilities with proposed landscaping, especially the FDA, FDC, DCVA and water meter to avoid landscaping being trampled and to minimize conflicts with fire personnel. 2 . What landscape material is proposed on the south side of the property (sod?)? Indicate on Sheet L1.1. 3 , Sheet L1.1 - Revise: a. The following Common Name landscape materials are listed in the Landscape Table but are not indicated to be used on the site: Pigmy date palm (PR) and Wild date palm (PS). b. In the Landscape Table the Code Name of PS is used twice, once for Wild date palm and also for Medjool palm. c. On the landscape plan the following are specified, but are not listed in the Landscape Table: Royal Palm (RY), Sylvester Palm (SY) and Medjool (street tree) (DT). Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 30 • Stormwater: 40 1. Site will not discharge freely as designed. The elevations at the discharge pipe appear to be below the existing grades. Please clarify. This area is subject to constant sediment transport, therefore, a simple sump will not be sufficient. 2. Provide drawdown calculations of vault. 3. Provide volume requirement calculations of vault. All of the above prior to CDB. 1. Require SWFWMD Permit, and DEP Permit (possibly) prior to building permit. Solid Waste: 1 . How is solid waste and recycing handled Traffic Engineering: I , Provide safe and efficient vehicular movement where columns, walls, or other site conditions impede maneuverability or vision. 2. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be a minimum of 82" to accommodate a H/C van. The entrance, route to H/C van space and exit must meet this requirement per ADA. 3. Canopy for pone-co•ch6re must be 114" or 9.5' vertical clear height per ADAAG. 8/8/05 - NO CANOPY IS PROPOSED 4. How does gate operate? 5. 20' x 20' sight distance triangle must be shown on the landscape site plan. The triangles are measured from the property line and must be shown at all access entrances/driveways per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code Book). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. 6. Provide accessible route to elevators for each residential tower per Florida Accessiblity Code 11-4.3(4). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 31 I . Show or indicate the location of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening. 2. Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 3 . Curb each side of the driveway. 4. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted, but is unclear why it has been submitted, since the application does not indicate what landscaping requirements are being requested to be modified or waived. It does not appear that any landscaping requirements are being modified or waived, therefore, the Comprehensive Landscape Program application may be removed from the application material. 5 . Elevations on Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 indicate the domed mechanical overrun on the highest tower to be 16 feet above the roof deck, however, the dimension line extended to the building indicates the domed mechanical overrun extends greater than 16 feet. Either reduce to the maximum allowed 16 feet or dimension the real height above the roof deck and include in the request. 6. Revise the request listed in Exhibit B to that indicated by Staff above. 7. Revise the first page of the application for "Parcel Size" to provide the square footage of Parcel 1 and the acreage for Parcel 2. 8 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 15 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That application for a building permit shall be made within two years of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2007) and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit; 17. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 32 19 . Potential condition oPapproval to be included in the Staff Report: is That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 20. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 21 . Unclear why the sidewalk on the west side of the building must be eight feet wide north of the trash room. What size dumpsters are being moved out to the staging area that requires this width? Why can't it be it be five feet wide? Also, unclear why the trash staging area is 12-foot wide by 28-foot deep. Is it the intention to have the trash truck enter the premises to dump the containers, therefore the size indicated, or will the truck sit in the right-of-way to dump the containers? If the latter, how many dumpsters are being placed out in the staging area? 22. Unclear why the entry sidewalk must be the size proposed at 15-foot wide. 23 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 24 . Sheet A2.02 indicates a formal, wide stairs in the front of the building from Level 2 down to the Level 1 (ground floor). These stairs start approximately 10 feet back from the ground level front wall and end approximately two feet north of the adjacent elevator/lobby. a. What effect does these stairs have on the Level 1 clearance for vehicles, since these stairs are at the main drive to the majority of the Level 1 parking (elevation indicates there is only 9'-4" from Level 1 to Level 2)? b. These stairs conflict with the entry walkway shown on Sheet A2.01 and Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1, and are not shown on these other sheets. Revise. 25 . Sheet A2.02 - Provide more information as to the "Private Dining Club" in writing (is this a restaurant, who can use it, is food prepared on-premises or catered in, etc.). 26. Sheet A2.02 - Is the terrace outside (north side) of the Spa is it there only for looks or is it meant to be accessible to the Spa (since no doors shown providing access)? 27 : Sheet A2.03 - Is the pool elevated above the Level 3 parking? Unclear as to effect on Level 2 parking. Advise. 28 . Stairs shown in the southeast and southwest corners of the parking levels on Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and A2.03 - how does one access these stairs, since adjacent parking spaces block access and there are no doors to access them? On Sheet A2.01, are the stairs intended to also be accessed from the inside (Level 1)? 29. Sheet A2.02 - Unclear how there is to be a "two-story lobby" next to the private dining club, since there is a dwelling unit above and parking below. Advise/revise. 30 . The Level 2 parking in the northeast and southeast portions will have a ceiling, which means there will be a floor/terrace on Level 2 outside of three dwelling units. However, it does not appear that these units have access to the top of the parking Level 2, only their defined "terraces." Unclear as to these extra areas outside of the dwelling units. Advise/revise. 31 . Sheet A2.04 - It is indicated that there are nine units by numbering, but I only count eight units per floor. Advise/revise. 32 . Sheet A2.06 - Floor plans on the left hand side are sketchy and not well defined. Having trouble figuring out the penthouse with 2,173 square feet as to where and what all the rooms are for. Revise. 33 . Provide a table on Sheet C1.1 that lists, by floor (Levels 1-15), the number of parking spaces and the number of dwelling units. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 33 34 . As to the number of dwelling units, I count the following: Level 3 - 4 units Level 4 - 8 units Level 5 - 8 units Level 6 - 8 units Level 7 - 8 units Level 8 - 9 units Level 9 - 9 units Level 10 - 9 units Level 11 - 9 units Level 12 - 9 units Level 13 - 9 units Level 14 - 5 units (townhouse counted on this level) Level 15 - 2 units Level 16 - 1 unit This totals 98 units, whereas only 90 units are being requested in the application. How do we get eight more units in the building than allowed? Building Area Tabulations (8.5"x11") indicates that on Level 11 there are 7 units, Level 12 with 6 units and Level 13 with 6 units, however, floor plans submitted (see Sheet A2.05 for Levels 8-13) indicate 9 units per floor. No different floor plans for Levels 11, 12 and 13 have been submitted that shows less units. 35 . Elevations provided on Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 are real sketchy, lacking in detail and are fuzzy, sometimes so dark it is difficult to read at all. Provide better elevations. Elevations also must provide information as to the exterior material and colors of the various elements of the exterior. 36. Sheet A3.01 - There appears to be a gate indicated at the entrance to the parking at the building, however, there is none indicated on Sheet C3.1 nor A2.01. Advise/revise. 37 . Sheets A3.02 and A3.04 - Indicate which "side" elevation these are as to "west" and "east" side elevations. 38 . There is an arch shown on Sheet A3.01 that is between Levels 2 and 4, yet this arch is indicated on Sheet A3.03 between Levels 1 and 3. Unclear if this a correct depiction or whether the arch was to be at the same levels. Advise/revise. Also, floor plans don't indicate any arch in this location. 39 . General Applicability criteria #1 - How is this proposed project in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent property to the west, which is an existing attached dwelling development? 40. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Address all reductions and increases listed by Staff in the "request" as to how this development would be otherwise impractical without the deviations. 41 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Address HOW this proposal will not reduce the value of abutting properties. 42 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Address HOW (in detail) this project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 43 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #1 - There are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District and another Planning comment questions why a Comprehensive Landscape Program (CLP) application has been filed. "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #3 - See comment above re CLP. The Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) is not available for residential projects. Signage will need to meet Code requirements. Aren't all existing accessory structures and signage being removed with this project? If so, include this in the response. "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #4 - See comment above under #3 regarding CLP and CSP. 44 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 - "Tower Separation" - What is the height of the Continental Towers building (you indicate less than 100 feet); provide the specific height (per Code from BFE). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 34 45 . Accurately depict fhelocation of the building above on the site plan feet C3.1 and on Sheet A2.01, including the terrace that cantilevers from the building. Concerned with the location of the balcony/terrace of the eastern portion of the building in relation to the required rear setback and the allowed encroachment into the setback by Section 3-908.D, which states: "Balconies, decks, bay windows, and similar features that linearly extend 50 percent or less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to extend into a required setback area not more than 24 inches provided through access is not obstructed." Show compliance with this requirement. If the balcony/terrace exceeds the allowance, then the increased encroachment must be included in the request as a reduction to the rear setback. 46 . On 8.5"xl ]" colored drawings, one being the rear perspective elevation and the other being a detail of the pool area, these drawings indicate some paved surface on the water area, straddling the rear property line. Additionally, there are beach umbrellas/cabanas indicated on the beach area. These are both shown in areas not owned by the subject property. Perhaps this is not intended. Advise/revise. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 35 I?Ls V; ?s a 1:00 Pm Case Number: FLD2005-06037 -- 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD Owner(s): Seawake Motel Ltd 691 S Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, F133767 Q TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email rot Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, F133757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.459 acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 700 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to sidewalk) and from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 32 Attendees Included: City Stab Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Annackbum Applicant/Rep: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, Rick Gillette The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Apron for solid waste pick-up shall not extend beyond the northerly extension of the west property line of this development (revise plan prior to CDB). The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 2. Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. 3. Inside drop into sanitary sewer manhole shall be compliant with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #302 page 3 of 3. 4. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f. [sidewalks to be constructed within this apron area shall also meet this standard]. 5. A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 6. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 7. Need to install at least one joint of ductile iron pipe on the service side of B.F.P.D. 8. Tie-in survey is required for all flat work (slab) prior to any vertical construction. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. 5.Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit. (per Development Code; Section 3-1302-d and City Or.6928-02) Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 33 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AURORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Will there be any docks or piers for boats? If there are to be any dock or piers provide and show on the site plan a standpipe water supply with a 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cover and chain within 100 feet of any peir/land connection as per NFPA-303 PRIOR TO CDB. 4. The fire pump must be installed above BFE. 5 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Fire Department Connections shal be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be aintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. 9 . Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 . Recommend preserving or relocating, on site, all #4 or greater rated trees. Provide a relocation plan prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . Revise Sheet L1.1 - Coordinate the location of underground utilities with proposed landscaping, especially the FDA, FDC, DCVA and water meter to avoid landscaping being trampled and to minimize conflicts with fire personnel. 2 . What landscape material is proposed on the south side of the property (sod?)? Indicate on Sheet L1.1. 3 . Sheet L1.1 - Revise: a. The following Common Name landscape materials are listed in the Landscape Table but are not indicated to be used on the site: Pigmy date palm (PR) and Wild date palm (PS). b. In the Landscape Table the Code Name of PS is used twice, once for Wild date palm and also for Medjool palm. c. On the landscape plan the following are specified, but are not listed in the Landscape Table: Royal Palm (RY), Sylvester Palm (SY) and Medjool (street tree) (DT). Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 34 i Stormwater: 0 1. Site will not discharge freely as designed. The elevations at the discharge pipe appear to be below the existing grades. Please clarify. This area is subject to constant sediment transport, therefore, a simple sump will not be sufficient. 2. Provide drawdown calculations of vault. 3. Provide volume requirement calculations of vault. All of the above prior to CDB. 1. Require SWFWMD Permit, and DEP Permit (possibly) prior to building permit. Solid Waste: I . How is solid waste and recycing handled Traffic Engineering: 1 . Provide safe and efficient vehicular movement where columns, walls, or other site conditions impede maneuverability or vision. 2. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be a minimum of 82" to accommodate a H/C van. The entrance, route to H/C van space and exit must meet this requirement per ADA. 3. Canopy for porte-co•chere must be 114" or 9.5' vertical clear height per ADAAG. 4. How does gate operate? 5. 20' x 20' sight distance triangle must be shown on the landscape site plan. The triangles are measured from the property line and must be shown at all access entrances/driveways per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code Book). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. 6. Provide accessible route to elevators for each residential tower per Florida Accessiblity Code 11-4.3(4). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 35 1 . Show or indicate the location of all outside mechanical equipment Intl required screening. 2. Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 3 . Curb each side of the driveway. 4. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted, but is unclear why it has been submitted, since the application does not indicate what landscaping requirements are being requested to be modified or waived. It does not appear that any landscaping requirements are being modified or waived, therefore, the Comprehensive Landscape Program application may be removed from the application material. 5 . Elevations on Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 indicate the domed mechanical overrun on the highest tower to be 16 feet above the roof deck, however, the dimension line extended to the building indicates the domed mechanical overrun extends greater than 16 feet. Either reduce to the maximum allowed 16 feet or dimension the real height above the roof deck and include in the request. 6. Revise the request listed in Exhibit B to that indicated by Staff above. 7. Revise the first page of the application for "Parcel Size" to provide the square footage of Parcel 1 and the acreage for Parcel 2. 8 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 15 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That application for a building permit shall be made within two years of Flexible Development approval (September 20, 2007) and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit; 17 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may. agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 36 19. Potential condition Ro approval to be included in the Staff Report: 40 That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 20 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 21 . Unclear why the sidewalk on the west side of the building must be eight feet wide north of the trash room. What size dumpsters are being moved out to the staging area that requires this width? Why can't it be it be five feet wide? Also, unclear why the trash staging area is 12-foot wide by 28-foot deep. Is it the intention to have the trash truck enter the premises to dump the containers, therefore the size indicated, or will the truck sit in the right-of-way to dump the containers? If the latter, how many dumpsters are being placed out in the staging area? 22 . Unclear why the entry sidewalk must be the size proposed at 15-foot wide. 23 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed, restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 24 . Sheet A2.02 indicates a formal, wide stairs in the front of the building from Level 2 down to the Level 1 (ground floor). These stairs start approximately 10 feet back from the ground level front wall and end approximately two feet north of the adjacent elevator/lobby. a. What effect does these stairs have on the Level 1 clearance for vehicles, since these stairs are at the main drive to the majority of the Level 1 parking (elevation indicates there is only 9'-4" from Level 1 to Level 2)? b. These stairs conflict with the entry walkway shown on Sheet A2.01 and Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1, and are not shown on these other sheets. Revise. 25 . Sheet A2.02 - In the Spa, why don't the men get lockers and a rain room? 26 . Sheet A2.02 - Provide more information as to the "Private Dining Club" in writing (is this a restaurant, who can use it, is food prepared on-premises or catered in, etc.). 27. Sheet A2.02 - Is the terrace outside (north side) of the Spa is it there only for looks or is it meant to be accessible to the Spa (since no doors shown providing access)? 28 . Sheet A2.03 - Is the pool elevated above the Level 3 parking? Unclear as to effect on Level 2 parking. Advise. 29 . Stairs shown in the southeast and southwest corners of the parking levels on Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and A2.03 - how does one access these stairs, since adjacent parking spaces block access and there are no doors to access them? On Sheet A2.01, are the stairs intended to also be accessed from the inside (Level 1)? 30. Sheet A2.02 - Unclear how there is to be a "tow-story lobby" next to the private dining club, since there is a dwelling unit above and parking below. Advise/revise. 31 . The Level 2 parking in the northeast and southeast portions will have a ceiling, which means there will be a floor/terrace on Level 2 outside of three dwelling units. However, it does not appear that these units have access to the top of the parking Level 2, only their defined "terraces." Unclear as to these extra areas outside of the dwelling units. Advise/revise. 32 . Sheet A2.04 - It is indicated that there are nine units by numbering, but I only count eight units per floor. Advise/revise. 33 . Sheet A2.06 - Floor plans on the left hand side are sketchy and not well defined. Having trouble figuring out the penthouse with 2,173 square feet as to where and what all the rooms are for. Revise. 34 . Provide a table on Sheet C1.1 that lists, by floor (Levels 1-15), the number of parking spaces and the number of dwelling units. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 37 1 0 35. As to the number of dwelling units, I count the following: Level 3 - 4 units Level 4 - 8 units Level 5 - 8 units Level 6 - 8 units Level 7 - 8 units Level 8 - 9 units Level 9 - 9 units Level 10 - 9 units Level 11 - 9 units Level 12 - 9 units Level 13 - 9 units Level 14 - 5 units (townhouse counted on this level) Level 15 - 2 units Level 16 - 1 unit This totals 98 units, whereas only 90 units are being requested in the application. How do we get eight more units in the building than allowed? Building Area Tabulations (8.5"x11") indicates that on Level 11 there are 7 units, Level 12 with 6 units and Level 13 with 6 units, however, floor plans submitted (see Sheet A2.05 for Levels 8-13) indicate 9 units per floor. No different floor plans for Levels 11, 12 and 13 have been submitted that shows less units. 36 . Elevations provided on Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 are real sketchy, lacking in detail and are fuzzy, sometimes so dark it is difficult to read at all. Provide better elevations. Elevations also must provide information as to the exterior material and colors of the various elements of the exterior. 37 . Sheet A3.01 - There appears to be a gate indicated at the entrance to the parking at the building, however, there is none indicated on Sheet C3.1 nor A2.01. Advise/revise. 38 . Sheets A3.02 and A3.04 - Indicate which "side" elevation these are as to "west" and "east" side elevations. 39 . There is an arch shown on Sheet A3.01 that is between Levels 2 and 4, yet this arch is indicated on Sheet A3.03 between Levels 1 and 3. Unclear if this a correct depiction or whether the arch was to be at the same levels. Advise/revise. Also, floor plans don't indicate any arch in this location. 40. General Applicability criteria #1 - How is this proposed project in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent property to the west, which is an existing attached dwelling development? 41 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Address all reductions and increases listed by Staff in the "request" as to how this development would be otherwise impractical without the deviations. 42 . Comprehensive Inf ill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Address HOW this proposal will not reduce the value of abutting properties. 43 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Address HOW (in detail) this project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 44. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #1 - There are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District and another Planning comment questions why a Comprehensive Landscape Program (CLP) application has been filed. "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #3 - See comment above re CLP. The Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) is not available for residential projects. Signage will need to meet Code requirements. Aren't all existing accessory structures and signage being removed with this project? If so, include this in the response. "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #4 - See comment above under #3 regarding CLP and CSP. 45 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 - "Tower Separation" - What is the height of the Continental Towers building (you indicate less than 100 feet); provide the specific height (per Code from BFE). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 38 46 . Accurately depict tide location of the building above on the site plan Sheet C3.1 and on Sheet A2.01, including the terrace that cantilevers from the building. Concerned with the location of the balcony/terrace of the eastern portion of the building in relation to the required rear setback and the allowed encroachment into the setback by Section 3-908.1), which states: "Balconies, decks, bay windows, and similar features that linearly extend 50 percent or less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to extend into a required setback area not more than 24 inches provided through access is not obstructed." Show compliance with this requirement. If the balcony/terrace exceeds the allowance, then the increased encroachment must be included in the request as a reduction to the rear setback. 47. On 8.5"x11" colored drawings, one being the rear perspective elevation and the other being a detail of the pool area, these drawings indicate some paved surface on the water area, straddling the rear property line. Additionally, there are beach umbrellas/cabanas indicated on the beach area. These are both shown in areas not owned by the subject property. Perhaps this is not intended. Advise/revise. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 39 1.00 Pm Case Number: FLD2005-060-- 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD • Owner(s): Seawake Motel Ltd ' 4t 691 S Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, Fl 33767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: E. D. Armstrong Iii, Esquire Po Box 1368 Clearwater, Fl 33757 TELEPHONE: 727-461-1818, FAX: 727-441-8617, E-MAIL: ed@jpfirm.com Location: 1.459 acres located on the south side of South Gulfview Boulevard, approximately 700 feet west of Gulf Boulevard. Atlas Page: 285A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to seven feet (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 feet to zero feet (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 feet to eight feet (to sidewalk) and from 10 feet to three feet (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 feet to 15.7 feet ( to sidewalk), an increase to building height from 35 feet to 150 feet (to roof deck) and a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of three dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Drive, four dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Drive and one dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Drive, under the provisions of Section 4-1402. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 845 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 535-2424, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 868 Bayway Blvd #212 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 895 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 530-4517, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House 19 Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 TELEPHONE: 447-0290, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Neighborhood Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 851 Bayway Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-441-8212, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cpoint7@knology.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 800 S Gulfview Blvd TELEPHONE: 727-442-0664, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: clwpt8@tampabay.rr.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 32 Attendees Included: City Statf: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Ann Blackburn Applicant/Rep: Ed Armstrong, Jayne Sears, Housh Ghovaee, Doreen Williams, Rick Gillette The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Apron for solid waste pick-up shall not extend beyond the northerly extension of the west property line of this development (revise plan prior to CDB). The following shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 2. Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. 3. Inside drop into sanitary sewer manhole shall be compliant with City of Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards Index #302 page 3 of 3. 4. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.f. [sidewalks to be constructed within this apron area shall also meet this standard]. 5. A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the right-of-way of any of the adjacent street(s) that are assigned to the city. See Don Melone (727) 562-4798 in Room #220 at the MSB (Municipal Services Building). 6. The City of Clearwater will provide water tap, set the water meter and a B.F.P.D. (back flow preventor device) if applicable. Applicant is responsible for all associated fees and all other installation fees. 7. Need to install at least one joint of ductile iron pipe on the service side of B.F.P.D. 8. Tie-in survey is required for all flat work (slab) prior to any vertical construction. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: 1 Prior to CDB: 1. Underground Vaults are not allowed as water quality facilities and are permittable only if specifically approved by the City Engineer. Provide justification for an underground vault. 2. In the event that an underground vault is approved, an oil and grease separator or comparable treatment system to capture automobile pollutants will be required. 3. Details and a cross-section of the vault must be submitted. Prior to Building Permit: 4. A vault maintenance schedule must be submitted to include an event following post-construction and at least on an annual basis thereafter. 5.Please submit sea turtle friendly lighting design and installation details prior to building permit. (per Development Code; Section 3-1302-d and City Or.6928-02) Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 33 1 . ***PLEASE NOT>;*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . Will there be any docks or piers for boats? If there are to be any dock or piers provide and show on the site plan a standpipe water supply with a 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cover and chain within 100 feet of any peir/land connection as per NFPA-303 PRIOR TO CDB. 4. The fire pump must be installed above BFE. 5 . This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, therefore the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Fire Department Connections shal be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be aintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . Fire Department Connection (F.D.C.) shall be located a minimum of 15-feet from the face of a building and shall be located no further than 40-feet from a fire hydrant. 9. Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: 1 . No issues. Legal: 1 . No issues. Land Resources: 1 , Recommend preserving or relocating, on site, all #4 or greater rated trees. Provide a relocation plan prior to building permit. Landscaping: 1 . Revise Sheet L1.1 - Coordinate the location of underground utilities with proposed landscaping, especially the FDA, FDC, DCVA and water meter to avoid landscaping being trampled and to minimize conflicts with fire personnel. 2. What landscape material is proposed on the south side of the property (sod?)? Indicate on Sheet L1.1. 3 , Sheet L 1.1 - Revise: a. The following Common Name landscape materials are listed in the Landscape Table but are not indicated to be used on the site: Pigmy date palm (PR) and Wild date palm (PS). b. In the Landscape Table the Code Name of PS is used twice, once for Wild date palm and also for Medjool palm. c. On the landscape plan the following are specified, but are not listed in the Landscape Table: Royal Palm (RY), Sylvester Palm (SY) and Medjool (street tree) (DT). Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 34 • • Stormwater: 1 , 1. Site will not discharge freely as designed. The elevations at the discharge pipe appear to be below the existing grades. Please clarify. This area is subject to constant sediment transport, therefore, a simple sump will not be sufficient. 2. Provide drawdown calculations of vault. 3. Provide volume requirement calculations of vault. All of the above prior to CDB. 1. Require SWFWMD Permit, and DEP Permit (possibly) prior to building permit. Solid Waste: 1 . How is solid waste and recycing handled Traffic Engineering: ] . Provide safe and efficient vehicular movement where columns, walls, or other site conditions impede maneuverability or vision. 2. Vertical height clearance for parking garage must be a minimum of 87" to accommodate a H/C van. The entrance, route to H/C van space and exit must meet this requirement per ADA. 3. Canopy for porte-co•ch6re must be 114" or 95 vertical clear height per ADAAG. 4. How does gate operate? 5. 20' x 20' sight distance triangle must be shown on the landscape site plan. The triangles are measured from the property line and must be shown at all access entrances/driveways per (City of Clearwater's Land Development Code Book). Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. 6. Provide accessible route to elevators for each residential tower per Florida Accessiblity Code 11-4.3(4). All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General note: Transportation Impact Fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 35 I . Show or indicate t• cation of all outside mechanical equipment and all required screening. 2 . Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. 3 . Curb each side of the driveway. 4. A Comprehensive Landscape Program application has been submitted, but is unclear why it has been submitted, since the application does not indicate what landscaping requirements are being requested to be modified or waived. It does not appear that any landscaping requirements are being modified or waived, therefore, the Comprehensive Landscape Program application may be removed from the application material. 5 . Elevations on Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 indicate the domed mechanical overrun on the highest tower to be 16 feet above the roof deck, however, the dimension line extended to the building indicates the domed mechanical overrun extends greater than 16 feet. Either reduce to the maximum allowed 16 feet or dimension the real height above the roof deck and include in the request. 6. Revise the request listed in Exhibit B to that indicated by Staff above. 7 . Revise the first page of the application for "Parcel Size" to provide the square footage of Parcel 1 and the acreage for Parcel 2. 8 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB; 9. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. Conduits for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 10. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That sea-turtle friendly light fixtures be employed with the site design, with compliance demonstrated on plans acceptable to the Environmental Division, prior to the issuance of building permits; 11 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title be recorded in the public records; 12 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all applicable requirements of Chapter 39 of the Building Code be met related to seawall setbacks; 13 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; 14. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, traffic impact fees be assessed and paid; 15 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits. 16. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That application for a building permit shall be made within two years of Flexible Development .approval (September 20, 2007) and all required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit; 17 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a 10-foot wide sidewalk within the South Gulfview Boulevard right-of-way be designed and constructed for the site frontage in accordance with Beach Walk design specifications. The developer and City may agree on an alternate construction schedule or the provision of payment in lieu of construction; 18 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding sign be a monument-style sign a maximum four feet in height, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building; Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 36 19. Potential condition0approval to be included in the Staff Report: . That a special warranty deed, specifying the number of dwelling units being conveyed or sold from 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive and being transferred to this site, be recorded prior to the issuance of any permits for this project. The special warranty deed shall also contain a covenant restricting in perpetuity the use of all platted lots at 125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive due to the transfer of development rights. Any mortgage holder of the sending site (125 Brightwater Drive, 161 Brightwater Drive and 321 Coronado Drive) shall consent to the transfer of development rights prior to the issuance of any permits; 20. Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That a condominium plat be recorded prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 21 . Unclear why the sidewalk on the west side of the building must be eight feet wide north of the trash room. What size dumpsters are being moved out to the staging area that requires this width? Why can't it be it be five feet wide? Also, unclear why the trash staging area is 12-foot wide by 28-foot deep. Is it the intention to have the trash truck enter the premises to dump the containers, therefore the size indicated, or will the truck sit in the right-of-way to dump the containers? If the latter, how many dumpsters are being placed out in the staging area? 22 . Unclear why the entry sidewalk must be the size proposed at 15-foot wide. 23 . Potential condition of approval to be included in the Staff Report: That the storage units on the ground floor be used for storage only, in compliance with all Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) rules and guidelines. Evidence of this restriction of use, embodied in condominium documents, homeowner's documents, deed restrictions or like forms, shall be submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy; 24. Sheet A2.02 indicates a formal, wide stairs in the front of the building from Level 2 down to the Level 1 (ground floor). These stairs start approximately 10 feet back from the ground level front wall and end approximately two feet north of the adjacent elevator/lobby. a. What effect does these stairs have on the Level 1 clearance for vehicles-, since these stairs are at the main drive to the majority of the Level 1 parking (elevation indicates there is only 9'-4" from Level 1 to Level 2)? b. These stairs conflict with the entry walkway shown on Sheet A2.01 and Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and L1.1, and are not shown on these other sheets. Revise. 25 . Sheet A2.02 - In the Spa, why don't the men get lockers and a rain room? 26 . Sheet A2.02 - Provide more information as to the "Private Dining Club" in writing (is this a restaurant, who can use it, is food prepared on-premises or catered in, etc.). 27 . Sheet A2.02 - Is the terrace outside (north side) of the Spa is it there only for looks or is it meant to be accessible to the Spa (since no doors shown providing access)? 28 . Sheet A2.03 - Is the pool elevated above the Level 3 parking? Unclear as to effect on Level 2 parking. Advise. 29 . Stairs shown in the southeast and southwest corners of the parking levels on Sheets A2.01, A2.02 and A2.03 - how does one access these stairs, since adjacent parking spaces block access and there are no doors to access them? On Sheet A2.01, are the stairs intended to also be accessed from the inside (Level 1)? 30. Sheet A2.02 - Unclear how there is to be a "tow-story lobby" next to the private dining club, since there is a dwelling unit above and parking below. Advise/revise. 31 . The Level 2 parking in the northeast and southeast portions will have a ceiling, which means there will be a floor/terrace on Level 2 outside of three dwelling units. However, it does not appear that these units have access to the top of the parking Level 2, only their defined "terraces." Unclear as to these extra areas outside of the dwelling units. Advise/revise. 32 . Sheet A2.04 - It is indicated that there are nine units by numbering, but I only count eight units per floor. Advise/revise. 33 . Sheet A2.06 - Floor plans on the left hand side are sketchy and not well defined. Having trouble figuring out the penthouse with 2,173 square feet as to where and what all the rooms are for. Revise. 34. Provide a table on Sheet C1.1 that lists, by floor (Levels 1-15), the number of parking spaces and the number of dwelling units. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 37 35 . As to the number 0owelling units, I count the following: Level 3 - 4 units Level 4 - 8 units Level 5 - 8 units Level 6 - 8 units Level 7 - 8 units Level 8 - 9 units Level 9 - 9 units Level 10 - 9 units Level 11 - 9 units Level 12 - 9 units Level 13 - 9 units Level 14 - 5 units (townhouse counted on this level) Level 15 - 2 units Level 16 - 1 unit This totals 98 units, whereas only 90 units are being requested in the application. How do we get eight more units in the building than allowed? Building Area Tabulations (8.5"x11") indicates that on Level 11 there are 7 units, Level 12 with 6 units and Level 13 with 6 units, however, floor plans submitted (see Sheet A2.05 for Levels 8-13) indicate 9 units per floor. No different floor plans for Levels 11, 12 and 13 have been submitted that shows less units. 36. Elevations provided on Sheets A3.01, A3.02, A3.03 and A3.04 are real sketchy, lacking in detail and are fuzzy, sometimes so dark it is difficult to read at all. Provide better elevations. Elevations also must provide information as to the exterior material and colors of the various elements of the exterior. 37 . Sheet A3.01 - There appears to be a gate indicated at the entrance to the parking at the building, however, there is none indicated on Sheet C3.1 nor A2.01. Advise/revise. 38 . Sheets A3.02 and A3.04 - Indicate which "side" elevation these are as to "west" and "east" side elevations. 39 . There is an arch shown on Sheet A3.01 that is between Levels 2 and 4, yet this arch is indicated on Sheet A3.03 between Levels 1 and 3. Unclear if this a correct depiction or whether the arch was to be at the same levels. Advise/revise. Also, floor plans don't indicate any arch in this location. 40. General Applicability criteria #1 - How is this proposed project in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of the adjacent property to the west, which is an existing attached dwelling development? 41 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 - Address all reductions and increases listed by Staff in the "request" as to how this development would be otherwise impractical without the deviations. 42 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #2 - Address HOW this proposal will not reduce the value of abutting properties. 43 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 - Address HOW (in detail) this project is compatible with adjacent land uses. 44. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 - "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #1 - There are no perimeter buffers required in the Tourist District and another Planning comment questions why a Comprehensive Landscape Program (CLP) application has been filed. "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #3 - See comment above re CLP. The Comprehensive Sign Program (CSP) is not available for residential projects. Signage will need to meet Code requirements. Aren't all existing accessory structures and signage being removed with this project? If so, include this in the response. "Termination of Nonconforming Status" #4 - See comment above under #3 regarding CLP and CSP. 45 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #10 - "Tower Separation" - What is the height of the Continental Towers building (you indicate less than 100 feet); provide the specific height (per Code from BFE). Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 38 '. 1 4 0 46 . Accurately depict the location of the building above on the site plan Sheet C3.1 and on Sheet A2.01, including the terrace that cantilevers from the building. Concerned with the location of the balcony/terrace of the eastern portion of the building in relation to the required rear setback and the allowed encroachment into the setback by Section 3-908.D, which states: "Balconies, decks, bay windows, and similar features that linearly extend 50 percent or less of the width of the building wall to which they are attached shall be permitted to extend into a required setback area not more than 24 inches provided through access is not obstructed." Show compliance with this requirement. If the balcony/terrace exceeds the allowance, then the increased encroachment must be included in the request as a reduction to the rear setback. 47 . On 8.5"x11" colored drawings, one being the rear perspective elevation and the other being a detail of the pool area, these drawings indicate some paved surface on the water area, straddling the rear property line. Additionally, there are beach umbrellas/cabanas indicated on the beach area. These are both shown in areas not owned by the subject property. Perhaps this is not intended. Advise/revise. Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 9/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by noon, 8/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 39 9 a Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No.V-Lb 0005---OLOV) Meeting Date: OAPO D Location ? Curre. ? Active Code Enforcement Case no yes: ? Address number (yes) no) (vacant land) ? Landscaping, es) (no) ? Overgrown (yes) no ? Debris (yes) (Q ? 'Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (Go) ? Building(s) jj?oo (fair) (poor) (vacant land) ? Fencing (none) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint goo (fair) (poor) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes) (Q j ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) no ? Signage (none) (&l (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) tri ) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ? Dumpster nclose (not enclosed) ? Outdoor storage (yes) (&) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date:-7L S Reviewed by: i'rMPI C0 Telephone: 1/797 Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 r1 , CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING .*?yf 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 CASE SUMMARY OCL9010661 0391 S GULFVIEW BLVD SEA WAKE LTD OVERNIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS PEOPLE Role: Business Owner SEA WAKE LTD PHONE: (727) 442-6123 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD FAX: No Fax CLEARWATER, FL 33767-2643 FEES 'R,; Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due LICENSE FEE - RENEWAL $1,937.25 $1,937.25 $0.00 Total $1,937.25 $1,937.25 $0.00 Or(;UPATIONAL LICENSE r Category 091000 RENTAL UNITS 110020 VENDING MACHINES: OPERATOR ACTIVITIES Date 1 Date 2 Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL Issue License - RENEWAL 'Iss'6e License ue License - RENEWAL Iss f 01-02 Renewal Notice 7/25/1997 7/97 BATCH renewal Notice 7/28/1998 7/98 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/21/1999 7/99 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/18/2000 7/00 BATCH Quantity 110 3 Date 3 8/17/2000 8/11/1999 10/8/1998 9/30/1997 9/10/2001 # Employees 0 0 Done Disp By DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE BLS DONE BLB DONE RRP rAForms\I nfoSum ma ry. rpt OCL9010661 IEW BLVD 691 S GULFV Renewal Notice 7/25/2001 7/01 BATCH Renewal Notice 7/27/2002 FY 02/03 BATCH Issue License - RENEWAL 9/9/2002 2002-2003 re'riewal Notice 7/11/2003 03/04 Iss'tie License - RENEWAL 9/9/2003 2003-2004 Renewal Notice 7/26/2004 04/05 Issue License - RENEWAL 8/20/2004 2004-2005 DONE DONE DONE r:\Form s\ I nfoS u m m a ry. rpt vbivision of Corporations . • Page 1 of 2 Florida Limited Liability ENCHANTMENT, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 211 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER FL 33756 MAILING ADDRESS 211 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER FL 33756 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed L05000031972 NONE 03/31/2005 State Status Effective Date FL ACTIVE NONE Total Contribution 0.00 Registered Agent Name & Address WARD, R. CARLTON ESQ 1253 PARK STREET CLEARWATER FL 33756 1 r /w ! 1 T •l lviana erilviemner Detail Name & Address Title NONE A 1 T Annual Exports Report Year Filed Date http://www. sunbiz.orglscripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&nl =LO5000031972&n2=NAMFWD... 7/7/2005 wobivision of Corporations • Page 2 of 2 • Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing No Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 03/31/2005 -- Florida Limited Liabilites THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=L05000031972&n2=NAMFWD... 7/7/2005 . Pigllas County Property App r Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 0 Page 2 of 5 17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 / 003 / 0160 07-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:13:34 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales SEAWAKE MOTEL LTD OBK: 00000 OPG: 0000 691 S GULFUIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767-2643 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 691 S GULFUIEW BLVD of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 f 2002 2003 rom - : sales 0 Sale Date OR Book/Pa ge Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( ) 1955: Book 038 Pgs 038-039 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( } 0000 Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( ) 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 6,650,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 6,650,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 6,650,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Gulf Of Mexico Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 152,746.51 1) 241 x 262 85.00 62, 991.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 152, 746. 51 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 152, 746.51 Short Legal BAYSIDE SUB NO. 5 BLK C. LOTS 16 THRU 19 & Description RIP RTS & LAND ON S OF LOT 19 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/7/2005 Pirj,llas County Property App of r Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 06 Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 17 / 29 / 15 / 05004 003 / 0100 :01 07-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:13:34 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel > 3 St Property Address: 691 S GULFUIEW BLVD Prop Use: 312 Land Use: 39 Structural E1Bmf_-nts Foundation Special Footing Floor System Structural Slab Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Concrete Reinforced Roof Frame Bar Joist/Rigid Fram Roof Cover Built Up/Metal/Gyps Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Splt Fixtures 342 Bath Tile Floor Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,973 Effective Age 15 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Aromas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 56,841 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 7,096 8) .00 0 3) Canopy .25 2,310 9) .00 0 4) Carport .30 925 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commsrci.al Extra F?atur?s Description Dimensions Price 1) ASPHALT 32600 1.50 2) ELEU PASS 6-STOP 30,000.00 3) POOL 720SF 25,000.00 4) PATIO/DECK 3600SF 8.50 5) FIRESPRINK 56841 1.75 6) ELEU STOP 6-STOP 3,500.00 Units Value RCD Year 32,600 48,900 48,900 999 2 60,000 44,400 1,973 1 25,000 18,500 1,973 3,600 30,600 18,360 1,973 56,841 99,470 85,540 1,973 12 42,000 25,200 1,973 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 240,900 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*1 R Fil 41 FM M http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/7/2005 f_ Piq.11as County Property App0r Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 06 Page 4 of 5 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/7/2005 BLV L VI BL's f B GT ?t BLVD r ?E'4r 44 14B Cl_1LF ti w ti I ,-, Pinp llas County Property Appwr Information: 17 29 15 05004 003 06 Page 5 of 5 ' n k i 71, r 3 3' t t F ?y. Back to ._S e arch_P age An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 7/7/2005 _0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All Persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (reconsidered from 07/19/05) The City of Clearwater is requesting reconsideration of the attached sign approved through the Comprehensive Sign Program application contained within the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application that approved a problematic use for Amscot Financial in this location. [Proposed Use: Problematic Use (Amscot)] at 1874 North Highland Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-01004 2. Ardent International LLC., Panaviotis and Helen Vasiloudes (M313 Development LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade & 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lots 1 & 3 and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 3. Raim & Xheziie Tzekas [A Very Important Pet (AVID) Salon] are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow pet grooming and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store and to permit a 6-ft tall fence located in front of the building (approximately 5 ft back from the N Lincoln Ave frontage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Pet Grooming/Outdoor Training Facility) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub, Lot 3 and parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John Schodder, Planner I. FLD2005-06058 4. Harborside Condo LLC (Mark Newkirk) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 15 attached dwelling units proposed, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 12.4 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4.3 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.8 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 87.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo, Units 1-12 & 14-17. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07070 0 0 5. K&P Clearwater Estate II LLC (Mark International LLC, Sunrise on the Beach Inc) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 90 ft along Coronado Dr and Hamden Dr, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.5 ft (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 229 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub Replat, parts of Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07061 6. LOPA LLC (Patricia A. Bilotta & Lorri S. Ritter) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 3 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 14 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (5 spaces) to 1.33 spaces per dwelling units (4 spaces), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 1254 Grove St, Property of AJ Moore, Lots 14 & 15. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05042 7. Coates I, Inc. is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6409; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 9 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 621 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay unit No 5 Replat, Blk 78, Lots 5 & 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07064 8. Jerry & Teresa Tas are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6409; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 14.94 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 & part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner 111. FLD2005-07066 9. Hess Properties 11 LLC, and Bay Esplanade Properties LLC (Stephen T Hess) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 51.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 64 & 566 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 79, Lots 3, 18 & 19 (less R/W for Clearwater St), and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07065 10. Seawake Motel Ltd (Enchantment, LLC) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 15.7 ft ( to sidewalk) and from 20 ft to 14 ft (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of 3 dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Dr, 4 dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Dr and 1 dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 691 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 16-19 & Rip Rts & land on S of Lot 19. Assigned Planner: OL'a-yh : Wgls, - CM, Planner III. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 11. Clearwater Grande Dev LLC (Steve J Page) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 17.6 ft (to open stairs) and from 20 ft to 8.8 ft (to pool deck), an increase to the building ht from 35 ft to 99.5 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 645-655 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07072 12. Canterbury Property Mgt Inc, TLS Holdings Inc, Dorothy C Boldog Tre, and Canterbury Oaks Inc are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 5.45 ft (to building), from 15 ft to zero ft (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth St.) setback from 15 ft to 3.63 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a • reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 401, 411, & 421 S Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 72-77, 121-122, 124, 128-129 & parts of Lots 123 & 127. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07068 13. KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east)setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off- street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner M. FLD2003-08039 14. Parkdale LLC (Belleair Harbor, LLC, Maria Nikolova) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 ft to 60 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and preliminary plat approval for 2 lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units)] at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park ls` Add Replat Blk C, Lot 5 & Sub Land. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06056 15. Homeless Emergency Project is requesting Flexible Development application to permit the redevelopment and expansion of an existing residential shelter (including the expansion of the kitchen and dining area), in the Commercial District, to maintain the existing front, side and rear setbacks with the exception of a front (south) setback of 4 ft (to dumpster enclosure), and to permit off site parking, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of • i Sec 2-704.C and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 18 units) at 1200 Betty Ln, Fair Burn Add Blk C, Lots 7- 9. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07063 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 09/04/05 FLD2005-06057, (153) f ALBER, VIRGINIA L 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 AMOROSO, DANIEL AMOROSO, JEAN 201 WILTSHIRE RD WYNNEWOOD PA 19096 - 3332 ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS POLITIS, GREGORY C 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 BARBIERE, JOYCE L TRUST 155 BAYOU ST MARQUETTE MI 49855 - 9101 BEACH FUN 1 LLC 246 2ND ST N SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - BERKOVSKY, PETER BERKOVSKY,HELGA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 508 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 BRADLEY, FELICIA N 284 BSB CMR 452 PO BOX 2563 APO AE 09045 - CAPELUTO FAMILY PTNSHP CAPELUTO, NACE L 28050 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2600 Clearwater Beach Association (Jay Keyes 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 0 ALDINGER, GUENTER ALDINGER, DAGMAR SCHWALBENWEG 4 74395 MUNDELSHEIM 00004 - GERMANY ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS, ANASTASIOS 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 BALKIN, JAMES M 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2604 BARBIERE, MICHAEL J BELANGER, JILL R 165 BAYOU ST MARQUETTE MI 49855 - 9101 BEL CREST CONDO INC 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 BLAKELY, JOSEPH E THE BLAKELY, BARBARA THE 921 WORCHESTER FENTON MI 48430 - 1816 BRANDT, STEPHEN W BRANDT, TERESA P 513 RIVERHILLS DR TAMPA FL 33617 - 7225 CHAMBERS, ANN M 15 GRAY BIRCH TRL MADISON WI 53717 - 1505 CLEARWATER BEACH SALES CENTER 20001 GULF BLVD STE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - 16 W v AMOROSO, DANIEL F AMOROSO, EDWINA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 302 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 ANASTASOPOULOS, ELIAS ANASTASOPOULOS, HELEN 1600 GULF BLVD # PHNO 1 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2973 BARBER, WILLIAM R BARBER, BARBARA N 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 601 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 BAYWAY SHORES CONDO ASSN INC PO BOX 3882 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8882 BENDERLY, ZVI THE 875 W END AVE NEW YORK NY 10025 - 4919 BOSTROM, ERIK SUNDQUIST, BRITTA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 505 CLEARWATER BCH 33467 - CAPELUTO FAMILY PTNSHP 28050 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2600 CHENOWETH, JOHN CRAIG 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 CLEARWATER GRANDE DEV LLC 20001 GULF BLVD STE 5 INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Clearwater Point 1 Beach House 16 Clearwater Point 3 Marina House 17 Doug Williams, President 845 Bayway Blvd 868 Bayway Blvd #212 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, Fl 33767 Clearwater, F133767 Clearwater, FL 33761 Clearwater Point 4 Island House 1 Clearwater Point 5 Admiral House Clearwater Point 7 Inc, Yacht House 895 S Gulfview Blvd 19 851 Bayway Blvd Clearwater, F133767 825 S Gulfview Blvd #104 Clearwater, F133767 Clearwater, Fl 33767 Clearwater Point 8 Shipmaster, Sail 800 S Gulfview Blvd Clearwater, Fl 33767 CLEARWATER POINT TOWNHOUSE CON 716 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 CLEARWATER, CITY OF PO BOX 4748 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4748 CLOW, CUSICK JOHNSON, MARQUERITE 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 CORMEY, WALTER P CORMEY, CAROLYN M 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 301 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 DE VITA, MICHAEL J DE VITA, HELEN C 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 205 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 DIGIOVANNI PARTNERS BAYWAY LLC 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 E&AINC 1600 GULF BLVD # PHI CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 FLINT IMP FUND THE 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 GIAMMATTEI, CAROL GIAMMATTEI, GUIDO 801 TWELVE OAKS PKWY WOODSTOCK IL 60098 - 4317 CONTINENTAL TOWERS INC 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 CUNNINGHAM, IRENE A THE 10900 W BLUEMOUND RD # 202 MILWAUKEE WI 53226 - DE VOS, ROBERT PO BOX 476 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0476 DORMER, JAMES J DORMER, DORIS J 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1103 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 E & A PROPERTIES LLC 1600 GULF BLVD # PHI CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2924 FOLEY, BETHANY A FOLEY, JOHN R 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2605 GIBSON, PAUL 521 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CONWAY, E P FAM LTD PTNSP PO BOX 3318 BOARDMAN OH 44513 - 3318 CURRENT OWNER 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 DI GIOVANNI PARTNERS- BAYWAY LL CARRIERA-BAYWAY LLC 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 DOULAS, GARIFALIA 40-417 HARDING BLVD W RICHMOND HILL ON L4C 9S5 00030- CANADA E. D. Armstrong III, Esq. Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP P.O. Box 1368, Clearwater, FL 33757 GARBIS, ANTHONY GARBIS, ANTOINETTE 204 S VINE ST HINSDALE IL 60521 - 4042 GOMEZ, R SCOTT GOMEZ, MARY L 1806 BREEZY TRL VERONA WI 53593 - 7901 GORDON, NOBLE L GRACILLA, MARY L GRGURICH, JOHN 3306 SAN DOMINGO ST 302 CLAY FURNACE RD GRGURICH, KATICA CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 3338 SHARPSVILLE PA 16150 - 3104 5021 W CAROLL AVE SKOKIE IL 60077 - GRUBER, CRAIG M 10 PAPAYA ST APT 502 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2060 HAYWOOD, MARGARET R THE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD #1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 HOWELL, LESLIE F JR TRUST 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ISLAND KEY DEV 19535 GULF BLVD STE B INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - 2240 KALLAS, LELA 4 BAY VIEW CIR SALEM MA 01970 - 2630 KELTY, JAMES SR KELTY,SUSAN 3994 NAPIER RD CANTON MI 48187 - 4628 KUDER, RICHARD C 1324 COBBLER LN ALLENTOWN PA 18104 - 9220 LEE, NADYNE S 908 WALLACE LEITCHFIELD KY 42754 - 1479 LOVITZ, JULIUS L REVOCABLE TRU LOVITZ, JULIUS L BEN 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 • HANKINS, JOHN M 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2606 HOLT, SUE E HOLT, SUE E THE 257 UNION ST EAST BRIDGEWATER MA 02333 HUBER, NANCY L 2789 BRIDLE RD BLOOMFIELD MI 48304 - 1609 JANIS, JOHN 10300 S LONG AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 4643 KAMINSKAS, STEVEN W KAMINSKAS, LEISA 4N160 HAWTHORNE BENSENVILLE IL 60106 - 2909 KINNEY, JAMES H KINNEY, BARBARA J 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 8 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 LE COMPTE, LENA 152 HIGHLAND ST BUCKEYE LAKE OH 43008 - LENART, TED THE LENART, MARIA THE LENART FAMILY TRUST 625 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 MANCUSO, ROBERT H 1457 CLIFTON PARK RD SCHENECTADY NY 12309 - • HANSELMAN, MARGARET M 206 PALMETTO RD CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 1430 HORNE, THOMAS L PO BOX 3009 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8009 ISLAND KEY DEV LLC 19535 GULF BLVD STE B INDIAN SHORES FL 33785 - 2240 JOHNSON, PAMELA B 4021 AUDUBON DR LARGO FL 33771 - KELLER, ELIZABETH M 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 802 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 KRITICOS, SAM KRITICOS, ELIZABETH 757 MANDALAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1433 LE, SANG VAN NGUYEN, DUNG THI 3896 LAKE BLVD N CLEARWATER FL 33762 - LINARES, ANTHONY 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2606 MARINI, DOROTHEA 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 602 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 MARKOS, CHRIS MARTIN, GARY M MASSELL, GEORGE M II 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1204 MARTIN, BERNICE J 716 BAYWAY BLVD # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2677 1046 ARDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2664 VILLA HILLS KY 41017 - 3727 MC DONALD, ROBERT J MC DONALD, MARY 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 MC MULLIN, DONALD J MC MULLIN, MARGARET U THE 500 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVD # 628 WILDWOOD NJ 08260 - 5891 MICHAEL, ANN M 7041 BRIDGETOWN RD CINCINNATI OH 45248 - 2005 MOORINGS TOWNHOMES II LLC 9100 BAY HILL BLVD ORLANDO FL 32819 - 4883 MOSCA, LANA L 1875 MCCAULEY RD CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1512 NASSIF, FREDERICK J NASSIF, JANET L 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 PALLS, BYRON P PALLS, BEATRICE K 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 PETRIK, CONSTANCE C THE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 PRICE, TIM E 781 69TH AVE S ST PETERSBURG FL 33705 - 6247 go MC GEE, JOHN P PO BOX 3455 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8455 MENDELSOHN, HARVEY H MENDELSOHN, CATHERINE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 MISKEL, ELIZABETH V 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 MORAITIS, CHRIST 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 705 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 NAKIS, MICHELINE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 804 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 OFSTEDAL, IRVIN J OFSTEDAL, LUCILLE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 403 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 PANUTHOS, PANIAGOTTA TRUST PANUTHOS, PANIAGOTTA THE 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 706 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 POLEMENAKOS, SOTIROS POLEMENAKOS, THEOHARI 352 ATLANTIC AVE MARBLEHEAD MA 01945 - 2732 RAMSEY, CLAIR J RAMSEY, BARBARA M 1406 SAINT GOTTHARD AVE ANCHORAGE AK 99508 - 5052 • MC KERROW, DONALD C THE 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1102 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 MEYER, JAMES W MEYER, LINDA K 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 401 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 MONCRIEFZ, J SCOTT MONCRIEFF, SUZANNE S 1570 WERNER DR ALVA FL 33920 - MORELLI, MARY A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 506 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 NASSIF, FREDERICK J 675 GGULFVIEW BLVD # 906 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 ORGETTAS, MICHAEL THE 74 CENTRAL ST PEABODY MA 01960 - 4357 PARR, VINCENT E PARR, LUNEY A 633 OAKLAND TAMPA FL 33617 - POLITIS, GREGORY 965 S BAYSHORE BLVD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 4217 REED, MARTIN J 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 105 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ROANE-BLAKER, CATHERINE ROOTH, CRAIG J ROY, JOHN B ROANE, PATRICIA ANN 675 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1203 ROY, JANE S 716 BAYWAY BLVD # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2678 RUSSELL, SHELDON P 1415 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD MENDOTA HEIGHTS MN 55120 - 1002 SCHAFFER, GEORGE A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 406 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 SELIMAJ, ISUF WILLIAMSBRIDGE STATION PO BOX 961 BRONX NY 10467 - 0726 SHEWA, MANOJ H DIPI, MASUMA A 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2657 SPAGNOLA, JOHN SPAGNOLA, ROSALYN C 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 204 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2646 TU,DUANHUA ZHANG, FENG 675 GULFVIEW BLVD # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 WAGNER, WILLIAM H WAGNER, JOSEPHINE C 559 LORING VILLAGE CT ORANGE PARK FL 32073 - 2960 WAZIO, IRENE WAZIO, EUGENE 5511 S KOMENSKY ST CHICAGO IL 60629 - 4415 WOLMARANS, HENRY H WOLMARANS, JACKIE 675 GULFVIEW BLVD S # 1201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2679 RUSSO, KAREN B RUSSO, ANTHONY J 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 901 CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 -2678 SCOTT, MICHAEL V 656 BAYWAY BLVD # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SGROI, RALPH O SGROI, LAURA J 2781 ST ANDREWS BLVD TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 6312 SILVERMAN, DIANE 2121 BATHURST ST # 620 TORONTO ON M5N 2P3 00030 - CANADA SULLIVAN, LETICIA BRITO SULLIVAN, JASON D 17113 RAINBOW TER ODESSA FL 33556 - VLAHOS, ELAINE 32 MAPLE ST WEST BABYLON NY 11704 - 7718 WARNER HOSPITALITY 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 WEG, KARL WEG, MARIA 1501 GULF BLVD # 807 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2903. WOODS, NOEL D 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 305 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2605 • SAILMATE INVESTMENTS LLC 200 BRIGHTWATER DR # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SEAWAKE MOTEL LTD 691 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2643 SHEFFIELD, MARGARET SHEFFIELD, JAMES S 640 BAYWAY BLVD # 106 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2606 SKTEL INC 678 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 SUNSPREE GREEN LLC 50 N WATER ST SOUTH NORWALK CT 06854 - VUJIC, GROZDAN 3321 SAWMILL VALLEY DR MISSISSAUGA ON L5L 3C9 00030- CANADA WARNER, SCOTT A KELLAN, PATRICIA A 706 BAYWAY BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2609 WOLFE, JOHN M 501 ERIE AVE TAMPA FL 33606 - 3643 ZAREMBA, THOMAS S I SEAGATE STE 999 TOLEDO OH 43604 - 4504 ZEFELIPPO, MARIA R ZEIER, NORBERT G ZHUN, ELLEN M FAMILY 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 708 ZEIER, MARGARET E TRUST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2647 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 503 675 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 1005 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2666 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2645 •09/39/2005 10:17 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG PAGE 02102 "'274W„i COAST NEUROLOGY NaRTH$ t ENG No. 9812 P. 2: 02/62 Sc ptember 16, 2005 AV. Wayne Well.* Flataner Ill CitY of Clearwlter,.Pkmning Depmfteat 100 5. Myrtle Avenue Cloanrwgeyr, L 33756 RE: Encb$mmem FLD2005-06057 Dear M&: We11s: My name is Dr. Haxlsh Paaucl, owner of the Cleawata Beach Resort. C a* 1 have pins ada3 the City of C1earwlftr for a miycd use pmjm consisting of ovemi4ht acrocntrtodadoos, retail. reOaUraret, sad aftfthed dwelling unite. ? t PrOktY is 10cated slimmtly across Gulfview Boulevard fm m the proposed Fmchantment pmjmct. I have ewmd the site pIM 8M atehitectnral drawito for t ect acid offer m7 M1, support. Being a &-velo1w in the area, it wM he a weacomed project vAth outstamd3tag grchitec chamctcriltics erred feel it witl be a compliment to me ft" development; 1 wrltc to you to in favor d Mod= welt designed eject which will et Nance Cl atcr Beach and hop tom' of the city of Clenwater Esau the same. / -0.9/1#i9/2005 10:17 7274468 NORTHSIDE ENG JW PAGE 01/02 Northside FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL DATE: Se.ptembcr 19, 2005 TIME: TO: Mr. Wayne Wells FAX NO: OF: 10:25 am 562-4865 FROM: Angel Haines, Executive Administrative Assistant PROJECT NAME: Enchantment / NES #527 COMMENTS : Letter of support. CIVIC; LANDSCAPE ENVI'RONMENT'AL MANSPORTA ION PAGE!, OF 2 s PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT OUR OFFICE SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THIS PROTECT. 601 CLEVELAND STREET, SUITE 930 CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33755 T (727) 443.28691E (727) 446,8036 E-MAIL: NE'STECM f ArDSPRING. CO.M CONTENTS OF REALTOR PACKET ¦ Client information sheet ¦ Advertisement schedule for newspapers, magazines etc. ¦ Sales critical path (key features and selling points of the project) ¦ Reservation agreement (legal document) ¦ Reservation payment timeline ¦ Unit pricing sheet ¦ Frequently asked questions with answers NOTE: These documents are for internal use only, and should not be shared with clients unless absolutely deemed necessary. Enchantment LLC attempts to provide complete accurate information in this marketing/sales packet. However, Enchantment LLC does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, graphics, text, or other material contained in this packet and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this packet and shall have no liability for damages of any kind. Sales Center 691 S. Gulfview Blvd, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Development Office: 790 S. GulMew Blvd, « Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 p. 727.447.5120 or 1.800.298.0696 f. 727.446.9841 EnchantmentCleorwaterBeach.com **,Standardize for Enchantment's Records and send to Enchantment's SaIes -Office CLIENT DATE NAME ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS E-MAIL ADDRESS TELEPHONE ALTERNATE TELEPHONE SQ. FT. PREFERRED LOCATION PRICE HOW DID YOU HEAR ABOUT US? INFORMATION SENT APPOINTMENT SCHEDULED FOLLOW-UP COMMENTS CONTACT Enchantment LLC attempts to provide complete acairate information in this marketing!sales packet. However, Enchantment LLC does not warrant the aCCUracy or completeness of the information. graphics, text, or other material contained in this packet and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this packet and shall have no liability for damages of any kind. Enchantment Ad schedule Direct mail piece to wealthy individuals, local and some national Tampa Bay Illustrated (inside back cover)- Nov 21 Robb Report (back cover)- Dec 14 Dupont Registry Homes (pg 10): Dec 20 TB illustrated (8 page gatefold)- Dec 21 Tampa Bay Magazine (8 page gatefold)- Jan 7 Architectural Digest (4 page gatefold)- Jan 10 Flair magazine (full page color)- Jan 15 Dupont Registry Tampa Bay (pg 2)- Jan 20 TB illustrated (8 page gatefold)- Jan 21 TB illustrated (back cover)- Feb 21 Newspapers starting Jan 15, will go on for 2 months every weekend: St. Pete Times (full page color, full run real estate and main news) Tampa Tribune (full page color, full run real estate and main news) Clearwater Gazette (full page color) Bellaire Bee (full page color) WSJ (1/2 page) Estimated ad expenditure: $ 1 million Sales Critical Path Building (discuss while standing in front of building rendering) o Architecture: roundness of building... wide panoramic views, 5 story arch approx o Units o 1,100-4,000 sgft from $1-3.7 M o Wide variety of floor plans, like 23 single family residences o Direct elevator access to your home's foyer, no common lobby ...single family home o I Oft. ceilings floor to floor typical, o Lavish use of glass Location (walk out to beach asking "where do you live", stand where beach will start-8ft pool sign) o Private beachfront o Beach starts where we are standing (sweep arm sideways). o Location faces north-south: sunrise and sunset.... sun-drenched o Dynamic water view: Gulf of Mexico, Sand Key Park, Bridge, sailboats go by and night lights View/Building footprint (take up in elevator to rooms 602, 620, 609 bayside) o (on way up) Amenities: 10,000 sgft, concierge on duty o Pool and spa and fitness center, additionally aerobic/yoga room o His/her sauna and steam... rain room (only some Ritz Carlton's have) o Sculpture garden and fountain o Dining Lounge and champagne bar o (at balcony) Just stand, let them take in the view o First and second typical living floor of Enchantment (6`" floor) o Left tower of building starts at blue awning, and the right tower of building is pulled back approx 10-fft. Enchantment LLC attempts to provide complete accurate information in this marketing/sales packet. However, Enchantment LLC does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information. graphics, text, or other material contained in this packet and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this packet and shall have no liability for damages of any kind. o Building is shaped like a butterfly to maximize views. o (on way down) "Developer plans to assign a certain number of units to compatible buyers before the lottery." We do have a priority reservations form, floor plans, and prices. Would you like to see them??? Closing (with floor plans open) Floors 3-7 These two and these two are between $1-1.5 M (point to units 7,8,1,4) These two are between $2-2.3 M (point to units 2,6) These two are between $2.7-3 M (point to units 3,5) Floors 8-10 Basic difference is the addition of the three center units (point to units 4,9,10)-between $2.1-2.6M Floors 11-16 Penthouses- between $2.1-3.7 M Which residence suits you the best (price range and # of bedrooms)??? Enchantment LLC attempts to provide complete accurate information in this marketing/sales packet. However, Enchantment LL.C does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information. graphics: text, or other material contained in this packet and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this packet and shall have no liability for damages of any kind. RESERVATION AGREEMENT (PRIORITY) ENCHANTMENT, A CONDOMINIUM THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of between ENCHANTMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33767, , as Purchaser, / (home), / (office), and WITNESSETH: , 2006, by and whose address is 790 S. as Developer, and whose address is telephone number tax identification number WHEREAS, Developer is contemplating selling condominium units at Enchantment, a Condominium, located at 691 S. Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33767, but has not filed and had approved Condominium Documents as required by Chapter 718, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Developer is desirous of giving Purchaser, and Purchaser is desirous of receiving, the right to contract for the purchase of a condominium unit in this proposed development, subject to availability of unsold inventory. Furthermore, Purchaser understands that Developer has separated units into three unit types based on their location in the building with Bayfront units being "A" units, Beachfront units being "AA" units and Grand Beachfront/Penthouse units being "AAA" units. IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Reservation. This Reservation Agreement when signed and delivered to Developer accompanied by the required deposit will reserve to Purchaser the right to execute a Purchase Agreement for the unit type designated hereafter in the Enchantment Condominium, subject to availability of unsold inventory. Developer intends to make a random selection from the reservation holders in each unit type and assign in the order of selection an appointment date and time when the Purchaser will have an opportunity to convert this Reservation Agreement into a formal purchase agreement. Purchaser selects the unit type indicated by an "X": Bayfront unit Beachfront unit Grand Beachfront/Penthouse unit 2. Deposit. Purchaser shall submit to Developer at the time of execution of this Reservation Agreement, a reservation deposit in the amount of $50,000.00 for a "A" Bayfront unit, $100,000.00 for a "AA" Beachfront unit and $150,000.00 for a "AAA" Grand Beachfront/Penthouse unit, which Sales Center: 691 S. Gulfview Blvd, • Clearwater Beach: FL 33767 Development Office: 790 S. Gultview Blvd!, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 p. 727.447.5120 or 1.800.298.0696 f. 727.446.9841 EnchantmentClearwaterBeach.cocas reservation deposit shall be made by check payable to Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pratesi & Ward, P.A., attorneys at law, as Escrow Agent, whose address is 1253 Park Street, Clearwater, FL 33756. Escrow Agent must provide the prospective Purchaser with a receipt for the deposit. Unless this agreement is terminated and the deposit returned to Purchaser, deposit will be applied against the purchase price of the condominium unit as specified in the Purchase Agreement. 3. Price and Availability. Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that Developer has not established a purchase price for units in the condominium or the specific benefits to be afforded with the purchase of a unit and that Developer, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to establish the purchase price for units. NO ASSURANCE IS GIVEN AS TO THE PURCHASE PRICE TO BE ESTABLISHED BY THE DEVELOPER FOR ANY PARTICULAR UNIT OR UNIT TYPE, OR THAT ANY UNITS AT ALL WILL BE AVAILABLE TO THE PURCHASER SINCE THE DEMAND FOR UNITS MAY EXCEED THE AVAILABLE UNITS BEING OFFERED BY THE DEVELOPER OR THE DEVELOPER MAY DECIDE NOT TO UNDERTAKE THE OFFERING OF UNITS DESCRIBED IN THIS AGREEMENT. 4. Purchase Agreement. Developer recognizes its obligations to file condominium documents with the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes, prior to entering into a binding purchase agreement or lease agreement for more than five (5) years, as required by Chapter 718.502(2)(c)(1), Florida Statutes, and Purchaser shall have a right to receive all condominium documents as required by Chapter 718, Florida Statutes. Only two units are allowed to be purchased per family and/or household. The Purchase Agreement will contain a prohibition of the assignment of the contract or if the purchaser is a trust, corporation, partnership or limited liability company, an assignment of the beneficial interest, stock, partnership units or membership units in the entity until the Developer has contracted to sell all ninety (90) units in the development. Thereafter, assignments shall be authorized subject to Developer's approval and payment of a fee to the Developer of $15,000. 5. Assignment. This Reservation Agreement may not be assigned by Purchaser without the prior written approval of Developer which approval may be withheld in Developer's sole discretion. 6. Termination. This Reservation Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the signing of a Purchase Agreement by either the Purchaser or the Developer by providing written notice of termination to the other party. Upon termination by this Reservation Agreement shall become null and void and of no further force and effect and Purchaser shall have the right of an immediate and unqualified refund of the deposit. 7. Unqualified Refund. Purchaser has a right to an immediate, unqualified refund of any reservation deposit monies paid upon written request to the Escrow Agent. 8. Not a Contract. Purchaser acknowledges that the acceptance of a reservation deposit and this agreement by Developer shall not create in Purchaser any equitable rights in any unit and that this Sates Center: 691 S. Gulfview Blvd, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Development Office: 790 S. Gulfview BlVdl, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 p. 727.447.5120 or 1.800.298.0696 f. 727.446.9841 EnchantmentClearwaterBeach.com E Reservation Agreement is not a purchase agreement to purchase a unit and that Purchaser shall have no right to purchase any unit unless and until Purchaser and Developer mutually enter into a formal purchase agreement. Purchaser agrees not to record this Agreement or any memorandum or notice thereof in the public records and if Purchase violates this provision, Developer may immediately terminate this Agreement and direct Escrow Agent to return the deposit to Purchaser without qualification. Purchaser represents that a copy of this Agreement was delivered to it before it was signed and that it has read this Agreement in its entirety. 9. Oral Representation. Oral representations and agreements are not binding on Developer or Purchaser. Purchaser acknowledges that it is not relying on any oral representations or agreements of the Developer or agents of the Developer (including sales representatives) and that Developer reserves the right to make such changes to the building, units, facilities or improvements of the proposed condominium as it shall deem necessary. 10. Enforcement Proceedings. In the event Purchaser initiates any action or legal proceeding regarding this Agreement, then Purchaser shall be responsible to pay Developer's reasonable attorney fees and costs (through appeal) in defending or responding to said action. 11. Entire Agreement. This Reservation Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Purchaser and Developer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Developer has executed this Reservation form as of the day and year first above written. PURCHASER: Signature Purchaser 1 Printed Name of Purchaser 1 Signature Purchaser 2 Printed Name Purchaser 2 DEVELOPER: ENCHANTMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: Print name: Title: Sales Center: 691 S. Gultview Blvd, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Development Office: 790 S. Gulfview Blvd, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 p. 727.447.5120 or 1.800.298.0696 f. 727.446.9841 EnchantmentClearwaterBeach.com Form W09 Request for Taxpayer Give form to the (Rev. January 2003) requester. Do not Identification Number and Certification send to the.M. oe rx or ttv TrCau" wernal Revenue Sar*e N Name m c- Business name. If dlfteront from above c v a C 0 individual/ ? Exempt f backup o El Partnership Other ? .................. wrthh? ? Check appropriate box: El Sole proprklor C1 Corptxatlru Address (comber, street, and apt or suite ra.) Requester's name and address (optional) c C 'e au n qty, state, and ZIP code e 6 Ust account number(s) here (optionai n N • Tavnaver identification Number RIM Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. For individuals, this is your social security number (SSN). social security ff However, for a resident alien, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity, see the Part I instructions on 1 I 1. I I . For other entities. it is your employer identification number (E1N). If you do not have a number, or page 3 see How to get a TIN on page 3. Note: N the account is in more than one name, sea the chart on page 4 for guidefrnes on whose nurttber Employer idcritirecation number to enter. certifica Under penalties of perjury, I certify that: 1, The number shown on this form is my correct taxpayer identification number (or 1 am waiting for a number to be issued to me). and 2. 1 am not subject to backup withholding because: (a) I am exempt from backup withholding. or (b) I have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that 1 am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends. or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding, and 3. 1 airs a U.S. person (including a U.S. resident alien). Certification instructions. You must cross out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on your tax return. For real estate transactions. Item 2 does not apply. For mortgage Interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property. cancellation of debt. contributions to an Individual retirement arrangement (IRA). and generally, payments other than interest and dividends, you are not required to sign the Certification. but you must provide your correct TIN. (See the instructions on page 4,) Sign Here signature of U.S. person ? Date ? Purpose of Form A person who is required to file an information return with the IRS, must obtain your correct taxpayer identification number (TIN) to report, for example, income paid to you, real estate transactions, mortgage interest you paid. acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, or contributions you made to an IRA. U-S- person. Use Form W-9 only if you are a U.S. person (including a resident alien), to provide your correct TIN to the person requesting it (the requester) and, when applicable, to: 1. Certify that the TIN you are giving is correct (or you are waiting for a number to be issued), 2. Certify that you are not subject to backup withholding, or 3. Claim exemption from backup withholding if you are a U.S. exempt payee. Note: If a requester gives you a form other than Form W-9 to request your TIN, you must use the requester's form if it is substantially similar to this Form W-9. Foreign person. If you are a foreign person, use the appropriate Form W-8 (see Pub. 515, Withholding of Tax on Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Entities). Cat. Nonresident alien who becomes a resident alien. Generally, only a nonresident alien individual may use the terms of a tax treaty to reduce or eliminate U.S. tax on certain types of income. However, most tax treaties contain a provision known as a "saving clause." Exceptions specified in the saving clause may permit an exemption from tax to continue for certain types of income even after the recipient has otherwise become a U,S. resident alien for tax purposes. If you are a U.S. resident alien who is relying on an exception contained in the saving clause of a tax treaty to claim an exemption from U.S. tax on certain types of income, you must attach a statement that specifies the following five items: 1. The treaty country. Generally. this must be the same treaty under which you claimed exemption from tax as a nonresident alien. 2. The treaty article addressing the income. 3. The article number (or location) in the tax treaty that contains the saving clause and its exceptions. 4- The type and amount of income that qualifies for the exemption from tax. 5. Sufficient facts to justify the exemption from tax under the terms of the treaty article. No. 10231x Form W-9 (Rev. 1-200 PRE-CONWRUC7IONPRICING- STAG E1 FLOOR FLOOR 16 15 UNIT 1 2.6 Bay 2.2 Bay UNIT 2 3.55 B 3.4 B UNIT 3 3.35 B&B 2.9 B&B UNIT 4 4.9 B&B 3.65 B UNIT-5- 2.7 Bay UNIT 6 UNIT 7 : = Beach vi UNIT 8 ew UNIT 9 UNIT 10 FLOOR 14 2.15 Bay 3.3 B 2.85 B&B 3.55 B 2.65 Bay B&B = Beach and Bay FLOOR FLOOR 12 11 - _ 2.1 Bay 2.1 Bay 3.2 B 3.15 B 2.8 B&B 2.75 B&B 3.45 B 3.45 B 2.6 Bay 2.55 Bay Bay = Bay vi ew FLOHO R IO 1.75 Bay 2.2 B&B 3.54 B 2.6 B 3.05 B 2. 25 B 1.27 B&B 1 Bay 2 25 Ba4- 2.3 3 FLOOR 9 1.725 Bay 2.15 B&B ~ _ _ 3.45 B 2.525 B .95 B 2.-9-5-B-- _ --2-.-15--B - - 1.23 Bay 0.975 Bay 2.175 Bay 2.225 B FLOOR 8 1.7 Bay 2.1 B&B 3.36 B 2.475 B 2.85 B 2.05 B 1.19 Bay 0.95 Bay 2.1 Bay 2.15 B FLOOR 7 1.675 Bay 2.05 B&B 3.27 B 1.65 B 2.955 B 1.96 B 1.15 Bay 1.275 B&B FLOOR 6 1.65 Bay 2 B&B 3.18 B - -- 1.6 B 2.87 B 1.94 B 1.1 Bay 1.25 B&B FLOOR 5 1.625 Bay 1.99 B&B .09 B 3.09 B 1.55 B 2.785 B 1.92 B 1.05 Bay 1.225 6&B FLOOR 4 1.6 Bay, , 1.98 B&B B 3 1.5 B 2.7 B 1.9 B 1 Bay _ _ 1.2 B&B FLOOR FLOOR FLOOR 3 2 1 1.45 Bay I 1.97 B&B _ - - 2.91 B 41 5 B "All prices in USD million '"Prices subject to change EwGGI,anb'Yl,ent r k f t?: F ?? Enchantment Timeline of Events/ Reservation Deposits Guide Reservations made before Feb 15 will avoid the lottery March going into hard contract with 12% (minus deposit amount) April additional 12% deposit needed July 2006 approximate date of start construction Reservation deposits: $50K for Bayside (Units 1, 7,8 floors 3-10 and Unit 9 on floors 8-10) $100K for Beachside: (Units 2, 4, 6 floors 3-10 and Unit 10 on floors 8-10) $150K for Penthouses (floors 11-16)/Large Beachfronts (Units 3 and 5 on floors 3-10) Enchantment LLC attempts to provide complete accurate information in this marketing/sales packet. However, Enchantment LL.C does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, graphics: text. or other material contained in this packet and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this packet and shall have no liability for damages of any kind. Customer Questions 1. When will construction begin on Enchantment? APPROX. July 2006 2. When will it be completed? APPROX. 2 YEARS 3. What system will be in place for my guest to visit? CALL BOX 5. Will there be a designated area in the water for short term visiting yachts? NO 6. Is it a 55+ community? NO 7. Are children allowed? YES 8. What is included in the maintenance fees? BUILDING EXTERIOR, CABLE, ESCROW RESERVES, INSURANCE BLDG., SECURITY, TRASH REMOVAL, WATER/SEWER AND CONCIERGE 9. Is there a Homeowners Association? WILL HAVE WHEN POSSESSION OF ALL UNITS IS HANDED OVER. 10. Can my condo be leased? YES How long do I need to own my condo before I can lease? AS SOON AS YOU OWN IT. What is the maximum number of months it has to be leased for? 3 MONTH MINIMUM 11. Where is the closest marina for my boat? Slips available? CLEARWATER BEACH, BELLEAIR BEACH AND MANY PRIVATE MARINA ARE IN THE AREA 12. Is there a garbage/trash chute for my condo and where will it be located? YES APPROPRIATELY LOCATED ON EVERY FLOOR 13. Is the swimming pool going to be heated? YES 14. Are pets allowed? YES, will have weight limit 15. Are parking spaces assigned? Yes, will be assigned in near future 16. How many floors is there going to be? 15 STORIES with 3 levels of parking 17. $$$ per sq. ft.? IT VARIES DEPENDING ON THE LOCATION, WE HAVE BAYFRONT, BEACHFRONT, PENTHOUSE AND SUPER BEACHFRONT 18. Have the project been approved by the City? YES Enchantment LLC attempts to provide complete accurate information in this marketing/safes packet. However, Enchantment LLC does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, graphics, text, or other material contained in this packet and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this packet and shall have no liability for damages of any kind. 19. What is the floor to ceiling height? FLOOR TO FLOOR IS 10 FT., SOME FLOORS ARE 11 FT. AND 12 FT. 20. Is the terrace/balcony area included in the sq. ft. that you mention? NO 21. Do we have granite/marble in any of the rooms? YES, IN THE KITCHEN, MASTER BATHROOM, and FOYER 22. What about building access? Security? CARD ACCESS POINTS 23. How many parking spaces do I get? DEPENDING ON THE UNIT SIZE, SMALLER GETS ONE (1) OVER 90% OF UNITS GET TWO (2) 24. Can I install a pool/Jacuzzi on the terrace (11th floor)- NO 25. When will I be able to choose my condominium? YOU WILL HAVE THREE (3) CHOICES AND WE WANT TO ACCOMADATE YOUR FIRST CHOICE. FIRST COME FIRST SERVE BASIS. 26. Who is the Builder? WE ARE CURRENTLY INTERVIEWING, INCLUDING BOVIS, HUNT, TURNER. 27. How are we going to decide who gets to chose first? FIRST COME FIRST SERVE BASIS. 28. Are we connected to any mortgage lenders? YES WE CAN HELP. 29. Can the buyer customize the unit away from the floor plans, moving walls etc.? WALLS CANNOT BE MOVED. UPGRADE PACKAGE AVAILABLE OR DECORATOR READY 30. Can the media room be pre-wired for a home theater? YES 31. Can the unit be pre-wired for a computer network? ALREADY IS 33. Is there a choice of lighting, i.e high hats etc? NO PERSONALIZED UPGRADES 34. Will the windows be tinted? YES 35. Can the buyer get a larger A/C unit and air handler? NOT NECCESARY 36. Where does the first living floor start of Enchantment? APPROXIMATELY ON THE 6TH FLOOR OF THE HOTEL. Enchantment LLC attempts to provide complete accurate information in this marketing/sales packet. However, Enchantment LLC does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, graphics, text; or other material contained in this packet and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this packet and shall have no liability for darnages of any kind. 37. Does the deposit monies for the Purchase Agreement earn interest? THE DEPOSIT DOES EARN INTEREST THAT GOES TO THE BUYER BOTH IF THEY CONVERT TO A CONTRACT OR IF THE RECEIVE A REFUND. HOWEVER, IF THEY CONVERT TO A CONTRACT ALL DEPOSIT MONEY (ESCROW AND PURCHASE) EARNS INTEREST FOR THE SELLER. 38. Condo Fees? Average of $900 39. Real Exhaust? Circulated Exhaust? 40. Guest Parking? A PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE IS GOING UP APPROX. 1 BLK FROM HERE, FOR LARGE PARTIES, CONTACT CONCIERGE TO ARRANGE VALET. 41. Can I purchase multi-units? NO!! Can I get a deal if I purchase 5 units? That is definitely NOT possible, we have people waiting to purchase one unit, I don't need to sell these for any less, we have the buyers. Enchantment LLC attempts to provide a)mplete accurate information in this marketing/sales packet. However, Enchantment LLC does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information. graphics, text, or other material contained in this packet and is not responsible for any errors or omissions in the content of this packet and shall have no liability for damages of any kind. GENERAL NOTES BEACH i I I ?. I O KEYNOTES O I ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ARCHrrECTURAL SITE PLAN ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM ARCHITECTS 4100 A%DM RNA FIW WM IOD. lanPA fl-3b5!•11hR: fNiEN][00 • FA .,Ww40Y0 erol: veM4d&olNm-Vm11'+wn.urbiite: uwvxdko.l'?.Y.vn An eaten F - - 06054 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN oe.iasoee SWE: V'L' . I'0 MMES COxeLliuii REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A2OO 2 4 5 e 5 4 MU GENERAL NOTE5 p-y r 51-0' ? 21-4- M- i....... Y Vi' 26-V ' Md N-0' j ..................... -------------------- ---------------- -- ................ ......................... I e } ..... .... j.. EYNOTES PF" ll ' --'-_ '-_- j A a l a- t I ! ? ' r -- ' --- -- --- --- --- -- --- --- --- OOA -- - 1 . I . . ?.5R 51fEPIAII t. TP.MFlEr?ax ? I II - I 'I I I ?I I I I III I II I ; I I 1 1 1 ?- 11, 1 J I -,,I I l i I ? I 1 r-_ -IT I ' I I I -I-P?i I I I?Ii;-? 1 1? I-I I-I .1u- -=a I ?.l,!;il?Ii I, I I __- I - I I I I I I ? j i ?" Tt EA EgLC05 I I Y j I _-_-_-__ -}-_ D -_-_ I -- I I I I I Y I I I I - I ?I I sai s ? I -------- ------- . i -.f P ACM I ___ G t -- r r - r D - I I . E.I I I? I I i I I I I? r ? I I I I I I I I ?? I I I I I ? I I I I I I I I I I I I ? I I I Y I A i -- -- - 1 - - I- -- --- -? - - -r I ---- -I--- -- a j EAT EAT ? ORIGINAL RECEIVED j - - - -- - ??`- --- --- --- - --?---------?--- --- -- - - - - ---- ? SEP 141006 I I PLANNING DEPARTMENT i I I I I - l 1 7 i CRY OF CLEARWATER --- I U LEVa 1 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT I _" l r - - I ?-0 CONDOMINIUM I - - - - - - - - --------- - - - - - GxGOMi u E91 GIIlMEW BpAEVaPp I I II I COLLMAN&KARSKY : _-_ _ _ _- - --- --- -- I J-_-_-_ - I I I _ _-_-_-_- _ - - -- _-__.:.... -"- .. ?P r v ARCHITECTS bdA`YlNt P.ATAFIST. SUITE KO•fYPAR)kN•e9151WM%XQO•FAY:INekND100 i® .. ... ... ....... .... ... ....... ... AACw } . ... n Prrou+ I ?erwrc? ?ergwt} ?ernxzl (eraxt Lrapar[ ... 06054 I ? \ ? \ ? \ ? \ / mm 09.13.2066 i FLOOR PLAN LEVEL I wLE, A' rd ItlfES . I I G„ a„„ REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A300 GENERAL NOTES ///111 ? 3 .5 4 4. 5 ? 1 5 B B. 9 10 11 1Ud ?, 24-1' 21d a7d C-O' M-Y 2q-4- ;, I t t I I I I A ? I I ,3 --------+ --- - ----------- ---------- KEYNOTES O ? f. D I ®I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r I pT4 I I , - - A - - - - - - - e 4 MAN 'rAbJfIS, 2. UiE G' OPERAERATfAS. 3. T"% CAM ?MTDL EDGE a5UB A8 4 S. INRO.iAR - 5a SITE PI.W, ® RAG i G L ] CL?l I , ® I II Q „ I II I i I ' I I uT? I qIG? Y1fite 2dm _l__________ II __ • . : . --_ ^ -------- '?' I "' I I I ? I I I I ? ____________ _ \ 1 ..... . ?Q( r ---------------- II 1 loo --- - RISER --- ----- ------ --- ------ - i I I ;,d. _. -- ?• I--I I I I P P I SPN.6 I I I -- _II ?? I _-_ _-_ _-_-_ Y O -- - l --- --' S - n - - - - - - - - - - - - - ?. a 5 --"-------I------ I -------? § ---- ORIGINAL RECENED - - - - - --- - -- - - - - - - o SEP 141006 E AT AOph ;y 1a 2, -------- -------- • PLANNING DEPARTMENT m of CL . e d - • EAR w ATE R l f I LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT -------- ? - - CONDOMINIUM .. - - - cOxpBMIwuM N AT .-_-_+ _-_-_-_Z ARCHITECTS 4301 ANMRAG RIT.EUMW - TAMPA R. 3%31- YOU; (Wft42WO• FAG fatl)t l[O mdl:=NtecUmlM k,*--wbltu-wllkmmk-ky- M c.olm .. \ , , , ... ,\ \ a mWSm m. raxRCR ..amw. a m ` ] L IU L - 06954 , 99.13.2966 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN YALE ue' . Pd RmES ? CMSULTAIT REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A301 GENERAL NOTE5 B o 3 6 .5 5 6 ] 8 °' -M IS'-0' 0q- K q-Z' qi' d-0' q-N' A-0' Ail q-H ?-7 Idi' N-1' IY-0' F ? - -_-- ?- L O KEYNOTE5 , { N MN UIM1E06VYi5. . - -"_ J.-_-J-_-_-_-_ -_-_-_-?-_ - _ T -_- -- ?A W%4WITR5. 1 1EWA1MiIfAL . TPA41 0111E 3 + . W SUB .1805". 5 5. WDE - 5FE SIZE PIAI f J' c. TPAFFX zvFlc Mff? I 4 1' .1 wgxro -__-i ------------ _ _- -_- Fl -rux ECI1Gx - --------- - I I I I ? I I I f I II I . 01 I LI atN to mEa ? R ? I I WAII I I ? I I; I I I I I I: 1.' - . -- ----0 - - - - -- t - - - - - - --- Y ---}--- - - -- =? -- ??, --}----- ---? g ill m e I5 C?- -. - - EM 1_ _-_-_-_I -- V WFi - I I I I ? BR0 MBR lOtlO.TGI YE N@illN H?A ?I ? ? i I I I I "? I I I R . „? i PN WAM I I _ - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - --- -. -_ - _ _ -_ .-_-_---_- WIE ---_-_ EI I F-j I I I? I tp I I I -_?Iv m? I I ??,?,? _ I I fA --e ORIGINAL Y RECENED - - -{- - FNf : SEP 14 2006 I I I ? I I ... PLANNING DEPARTMENT CR1' OF CLEARWAIER LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT -_" ? ? CONDOMINIUM F .-_-_ ----- - - _-_ i, -_-T-_ r - - - - -- =; _-_-_ D91 GUlNifW 6WLEVMp COHUixUM I I I I I ---------------- -- ? I ? I I I - ----_ ARCHITECTS - - - - ---0d Ud AV]GR PLAZA FiQn'. NIfE IOp• TAMPA, A. 33N31•10IOE:(88MI1000 • FAN: fd")Wmon b - - - - - - _._____ ______-- - _______--____ -------- - ----- - _ -,aI:mhuWnlNq ywx.M? u M 0001809 III J Ip. n, FfNAOx an ?1CMI I r------------ 06054 09,13.2066 LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN «sML,W. VELOPMENT ORDER A302 ' swa Iro . ra xms REVISED DE 1 3 3 4 5 1 B 9 o GENERAL NOTE5 raa rte' 6'-B' 74.1' A'-0' as 4-iy tla 4-H p_y M-A D A l 1 I KEYNOTES O ? -_- __ I - - _ - _ - . - - - - , J l I \ - A 1 . mw aluly cowirm 7. GATE MMT . 3. TRA910 RRMTVW l E04f OF BIIH I NyA 7 ' s. "MWE - WE M.W N I I I I I II ? I &W AM h L4 te -DJ j 1 IC' ' . j "MC ALL I I j -- - I ----- - -- ,, I k ------- -------- : -- --0 ? ?' ' ry4 NIGER I I I , I I j I I I I BTQEKf ? ? , I? II?? I D LlIILA I l m I I l I ? Nlf LI N 1 A'bl ROAi I urt u , BFEN@iABN l@ H XYIOEEI B Q Nanl I?? j ? ? I , I I I _ _ _ - - ; ?__ ? -- ---_- _ ? -_ -_-_ EI - - ------ - - - - _- - --_ - --_-_ - - _ -_ g I I J 11{. I I I _ I I I I I I _ ? 7p I I I I 0 0 I I f . I - - I I 4--4- - - - - I I - - - `•_B - - - - I I : - - - 0 ORIGINAL j NTU i B4 N@fA9q! I I NT4, j IIEEN&7 A40J j I I ?i ? ?I. L? RECEIVED I - - I - - I -4-4- I --- - - - +.7-4 - , -- - - • --- ----- 4 2006 5EP ? PLANNING D EPARTMENT SU I I . CITY OF CLEARWATER I LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT - { ° CONDOMINIUM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 691C INIEWBWIEVNro COxpOIxlxWx a I I T 7 a ?_-_- -- . --_-- _ - -.-_-_ NAYE _-_-.-.-. - -.-_-.-_?. .--- .-. --_ - _- _-_-.?_-. ---.? ARCHITECTS y , GGO•EAXfBOkBIDEO 3X I[0.1R ,xI AVLItlR HAG FkN -- ---?- - -- ---- --- -`--- `----- -- --_- -_"?'? -- Y -- _-- l ----_?--- ----""O -Wt. y. t t@.I ardl, mhitttNdMm-kmkc.i MlW - wuw-?kY.rwn -CBB,BA 1 A Ehsw r ° 06054 09.13.2066 LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN mow'. ra xms -B µ REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A303 GENERAL NOTE5 I ? 3 4 4. 5 Ma T B 9 to a ? ? i i i PFD li 5'd N- 4' Ida Ina a-1 7 ra 4-d In-Y Nip 1q'.4 A Ii\ I ----------- I O KEYNOTES O f - - I - _ - - _ If --- - ---- -_-- ---- (?? ---?:1 F I, rAN IRMT(P? T n. 41TE WFPAit. 3. iPASH "M iEWM111d. 4. F Cf 9 MOVE 5. VIRD-i,W[ - SFE 51(F II ? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I ? II 4 -_ - _--- I I I __ I _- _-_ I`? ________--_ mm ?N?,.?n® I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II eEENH11AM1 I I I lie ? I ! I v 1? I i - ----- urt? ?? - - t -- ---- - - - - -I - - - - - - I ? •3lMEIA•N - - I - - ---0 =_ ?` I I I I I I ? -_ I I R I ' I I I f I ? Y - - i - -i- - - - - - - - - ---------i - - I I I _ I I I I I I I I I I I I - x I I ?' ? I I I I I I I I 111 444 1 I Y ORIGINAL RECENM ---- ---- - -- --j- - - ---- -j-- - --- -- } - -- o SEP 14 2006 I E? `W PLANNING DEPARTMEW I CITY OF CLEARWATER I I I I I ? I I I LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT -- /? ---_ n CONDOMINIUM -_------- _-_ ? --_--_ - ----- _ e9,GULfwEW BWLEYNm CCNOOMItWu I ? I ? I II I I I ? ?? I I I I - - _ - --- .---_ -- _---_ ---_ ------ ARCHITECTS L_- - -? p? - & - - - - -I - -f- - J - - - - - -?- - - l_ L - - - - - - ? - - - -- ---- n ?:l Ko Ua A4]tlR_,jj. WEro.tu PAP )e)• cYEtEOre XOe •iAn I.'., mNxLLYdYrvr'FmlY?mn.u?c?i?: wiw.vlFm.?kvsky.rwn ?? 06064 09.13.2066 I L LEVEL 5 FLOOR PLAN CON-MT YLLF IA' • ra ,mFs REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A304 GENERAL NOTE5 2 3 4 d. 5 Btl-0 5 B 9 10 II i' i Tf- f di' -f-W, a-a W-d V-r A l 1 C? KETNOTE5 n I If -_ ?__ _-_ _ _-_-_ -_-1-_ -_-_ _-_ - A 1. MIN UnM' CONDW . 2 TRAW 118 Tff. ?4 3. EDGE 7 S ABOM 4 RMMSCAK - EEE0.'E _-_-_ _-_- {(?}jI}11} - _-_-_ _-_ ---_I _-_ - 6 ® I I ?n?A? IIW I? ??`"?' I I C I I ?I I I I I ? R ® ' ' I I ' d' I ?'P I I I -- -- -- -J - - ----- ------ }- I-- - - - - -- -- - - ??A>a °? I I I I I I ""? ??A? ----- ----- _ - - --_ - - - Y E E.I _-_-_---__- I I I Y ' 9 E I B (( ---- - ---- - -?- -_?_ -_ ----- - -------- - -I---_ ?-- --- --- ?--- -_T_-_ --- - F ORIGINAL ffi RECEIVED Bnu INW ?? I r b Ir I i _ - _ - _ ' G SEP 14 2006 " IEF tl@tAYll PLANNING DEPARTMENT I n°ffr?AW I I CITY OF CLEARWATER I I I I I I I I I II I II R LEVEL 8 BOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT I N CONDOMINIUM r_-_- - ?! -_--T_ -_ -_- - -' - - - - - - N91 GUlfNEWPWLEVIRp COlDONWIUM 0 ?I I I N ? L? i _-_-_ _- _- - _-_-_ -_-_-_-_- -_ - --- ., ARCHITECTS - - - -?- - - -?- - - - L - - - -NtH-mAy.-.M AA cmim X'J. PtWAJN AfYID]A` ?e^ 06064 09.13.2066 LEVEL b FLOOR PLAN I W • I'-0 ° 5 REVISER DEVELOPMENT ORDER A305 GENERAL NOTE5 I ] 3 4 4. 5 1 . N-0 5 0 e. 9 T a i• 2-f- 1' E'-0' V-0' C-tl 404 9-p' tl-Y N'i' 111_1' A I\ I I I I I I KEYNOTE5 0 l __ , ---- ----- I -------- T _- _ - "TECKPATl .Nfl ??iM*Ta. AWIE i mr?ave ----------- -- I ,ay 4 . -_- _-_-_ - _-_-_ _-I_ I -_--_-_ -_-_ _-_-_-_--I-- _- _- _-_ rn -i ------_ -_-_ g ® I1 l I 1' i ?? ??'?' I I I I ? I .I ?'?I I I; I I I II 6ff,?A?6 I I I --------- ----- I. I I ' I I R I ® I'?` ' I I l I I '? d!I ® I ? -- -- -- --J _ - --_ - - -_- - -- --------- ----- _=- ___ - ? - - - - - - - - - i I I I I I iI I I I 6FE6111ffA'bl i I ------------ -- __ ----- - _ - - - __________ _- __ ______ I _ - _ _ _-_ - Y - I E -_- _ _- _ _ -_-_ _ _ _-_-_ ... -_-_ I . i i I I I I I I k ? I I I I I I i I _ -_ --- --- ---------- NNN 5 WWW ORIGINAL RECEIVED 6[ee?AS? I 1686 A= -- ---- -- -- j - --- - ----- - =? - - - -- --- - SEP142006 I I PLANNING DEPARTMENT e A!L CRY OF CLEARWATER II Levy T FLOOR FLAN ENCHANTMENT '? I CONDOMINIUM _--- -- ---- - - ------ -_ -_-_ -_ - -------- -- - -- --_-- --- 691 GULMEW BWLE M LONOOMimUM ?_-_- _ - - ----- ---- -- ------- _ -_---_ _-_ - -- ARCHITECTS L_--- --I C _- - - - - _-_ -------- -y/ - _-_ \ 1- _---_J _-_ - pMGOkflAARN.BIE[O.fYPA 3W gGEfEOtlM[E•FA fkk8DC0 ? MLGDt6P ?o ?Iw w 06054 09.13.2066 H LEVEL 7 FLOOR PLAN 'b • r° G°'SGL.A6, A306 REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER GENERAL NOTE5 I 1 3 4 T 5 2 d-0 .5 B q 10 I I ;• 2q- 1' N'4' Vd 9-b 5'-0' 3YO' S'O 4-tl' B'-Y A KEYNOTES O -1, - _-_-_ _-_-_ I_- -ll -_-_?_- If _ _- IT -•- -1- ___-_ I . MN UTUTY Coww1 1. GATE O"EY-ITG6. 5. TRI9I atU TamToL 1. VU O SV818U/E ME w %Tf mm. 5 wmc B ® IMID3 I t 1 ? pEF D1F[f A9L 4 1 I ? I UHI E3 6E5 W AMJ I I `',{ I -- ---------- I 71 I I ? I I I I I ® I ' d. - - I- -- - I - - J - T L - - - ----- --- ------ --- -----0 Aw Dg m ? j I II I I I I -_-_- _ - _-_-_1_- _?_-_- _ _-_ _-_-_-_ _ -_-_?_ -_?_ -_-_ _I• _-_-_-_ -_- ---'• - _ I I I I o I Y x 5 I I - - - -?, - - -- - - ?- - - ® - - - -- - ---0 ORIGINAL RECEIVER ? - - I ---- DB pwsl A54 - - - - - -------? EHD'lEI AL{I - '? -- I - ---- I - ----- f -- ------ SEP 14 2006 l l PLANNING DEPARTMENT D AyY I I CITY OF CLEARWATER ? LEVEL a FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM --_- .-_- _ -_r_-_ - - - _ _- _ _ --- - - - Y - - _- _ _-_-_y H1 CU'OOMININA GLlNIEW BGLlEVeAG fi i nI _-_ _--- - --- - _-_-_+_- _-_-_-- ARCHITECTS j I - - - - - -- - - - - - -- --- - - - - - - _-_-_ 1 - -_-_-_- L _- _-_-_-0 j da uGDURP.UA Flarc.57fE IDn•fAMPA rL SkN•VfM?ifWM1HE0•fA%: Y63kDIdKE - - ? A,G?,DLD ~Yp 06054 09.13.2066 n LEVEL S FLOOR PLAN C.-T-T x E ' "? wrn REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A307 I Z 3 4 5 ) ? V-0 5 B 9 GENERAL NOTE5 21- 4' N-0' tl4 5-M 4 4 374 S'4 4J7 tl-Y M-L' p_/ D A 1 KEYNOTE5 I -TI If - _ __- - _ - _ - _ - - -_ _ A I ].. INN WEEMM' (DNDUfS WEWRR9 Wm TmWm 9. EWE x9 M E 5. WI)5CAPE-SEE 511E FL I_ I - - - -I I- - - ---------- --- ---- --- B I I I I I I I I y I I I i I II FYI I I I I ® I?? I I I I I I I I',I ?? ® I I - J - -a - - - - -?- - ? L - - -------- -- ---- I ---- --- I I I I II I EEENEE A1N Ni NEEP A9N NI NEE AM i j I I I II I i j I I I I I I _ I I I I i j I I I I -_ 444111 - _-_-_-_-_- _-_ A . j ? LLWJJ I ff'? I I ORIGINAL I MA ., ?E Y RECENED ?---- - ---- -----?- ---i- -- -i---- -------?- ' -- -j---- ?- -- - - ------- -----?---- --- N SEP 14 2006 VEIN NWAW I I I i ? @NFfl A'Al PLANNING DEPARTMENT YOF CLEARWATER ( a C I LEVEL s FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT - - - - - _-_ _ -_-_ CONDOMINIUM CWOOMINNN _-_-_ _-_- _ i 91 GUINiEW ?IILEVAPN I EI Y I s O L & I ARCHITECTS ? ? I - ? - --- - 43a AY7GR PlbL F10N,'. &M NDI0! FAY fN)1 KO•IA`,PAFL )k31. VL1ff: fNf5-k- .N? SPAR N? - - -I - - - - - - - - - - - _-_ - - - - - - - - .n 06054 094112066 LEVEL 9 FLOOR PLAN -SUL - 08 ".I E• Irt• • 14 "°1E: REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A3 GENERAL NOTE5 ? 3 4 4. 5 Ztl-0 ] -`? B B. 9 10 II i vla' N J Y'a' tl-0 4'-1Y ' S'4 rid 1'-0 4 b' 1T-Y w'a' 2q-" I5'4' i' D A I\ i O KETNOTE5 O ---------- 1. NBN aim covwr .. -- -}--.'' -- - ----? i -?-- ---- --'--? --=" -- --- - -0- GE F ,W51 Wm rEWXwMN. 4 FD6E 65LIB 181E S WADSG^F - SH 511E FlNL _ - . - _ ?11If I{ _ - _ - _ - _ -_-_-_- - _ - _ -_-_-.-. _ W??j l --- 1 -- -- &w - - - - - ---i - _ - - - - - r - - - -FYI ---- - --1-- ---- ----0 I I I i i l i I® I I x - - - J - -? - - - ?- - - " -- - ---- ---- ----0 I I I I I I I II llm H A= -- - al ?NHTAYI - j R _ -___ ?I l_ l ? ? - C C _ -_---- --_ _ - _--- _--?Y - --- --- - --- - -- - - - ET ACV= r Y h 1 Lill RECENED - - - - - - ---i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ----- 14 2006 SEP •? PLANNING DEPARTMENT CI11' OF CLEARWATER p R LEVEL 10 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM - - - - - - } - - T - --f--- - - - - - - - - } - - - - - - - - T - - - -- - CODDDrrDM w 1-D r T F ( i - _-_-_- _?_ -_?_-__? -_?_-_ _------ ?_- -- ------ _--- --- -_ _ _ -_-_---_- _---- ARCHITECTS Ay I _-_ _-_-_-_J__ I-_- I . _-_-_ \ ?-_ -___- L _-_- _ • _-_-- n 4101 AIY.iCRPLAll .fi01E b0• TArrA, FL .yg1¢;fdfMl]K6•FA%!ODlOlD100 erta: v[M'aVrahmkalky.wn.:•k'a.: uww.mYmml'u?ll'.tan ML0016A dtr/ \/ `' ? PfNWi A0. IEN9P1 ?? 06054 09.13.2066 LEVEL 10 FLOOR PLAN ' ° LOHSUITMT sort: Dv . ro umEs REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A309 NOTE5 II III T-n ii III LEVEL II FLOOR PLAN swb ire . ra worts ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 I LEVEL r FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM 691 GULMEw pWLE M n CONGOMINIIM I? ARCHITECTS 4301 AioM M_4ZA PKWY "M W iNPA R. 336x•MU f6M642 O-I"(W.CEID7W emdL aeN4.Ualhm-kmkymn• MCWU -.mlkm-I.-4y.- AA 9 1. MMSd A3YSGN " 06054 09.74.2068 G w REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A310 ?. ON IRIIRY fAMli AWVE 1. 611E OFMTM a. v sve s. wvxurE - s¢ srtE nuk 1 1.2 2 3 3 4 5 ] 374 a B?. 9 7- II GENERAL NOTES Ib' -11 YQ PT-2 It 3tl4 5?4 C-Itl V2- 1 Wi' 44 d" a'd V]' V-5 1/1' I O KEYNOTES F I UM 2. GATE TE " S. N1RA5CIPE vrz PLW e ?L ? 1 J ? ?-- J ? -L -- -----L-- -------® -- - --- - --- - - -- -- - ----- I p ' - - - T ? ? ? ----T------ - ----- -- -- ? . F -- --- ------I -?- ? - - ? ? --- - - T - I W - I I I ?I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m12 I I 6tlHr ?T1 I I I I I ?fi-- II f III -- -- ----- I -1r I -- r7i -- I- ' I ?- I - I j- II II ----- i - -- o I I I III I I I I I I - - I--L - -- ----- ? ---?- - - - - -?- - ?- - - - - - - - -- ------ ?? I, I I I I I I I I I I X1 A.41 ° III ? I I I I I I ? I I I II ! III I I I I I I II I ? C-?---- -- --- - -- ----- I -- ---- - C - - - -- - --?- ----------- -------0 r II II II i III III I III -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o ? ? II II I Y >r urt?u eer sw , I I a s _ I? - I I - ---------- ------0 RIGINAL I I I I RECEND III I I I I I r >, I I I III I I I I I I ,I I I I SEP 14 2006 II I ------ I I I PLANNING PLANNING DEPARTMENT I? MA-I I , I I CITY OF CLEARwAtER - - E- ----------- -4- --- ---?- I- - -------- - - - -- -----1I ---I-- --------- I - - - ? LEVEL 12 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM -_----_.T_ ---_ 6n GNLMEw BLIIIEVNN LMfgMiNMH _--__-_---r _ -_T ._--_-_ __ ARCHITECTS I ? I ? L I 4MdN]tlRFWAFKN'.&MK••u'pAR336M-WIL6(W7N2CM-F? teOM40W k-ky ?H??K.?., K.?1 0? L 1 - - - L - - L----- --?----- ---?- - -------- -?- - - - ------- - - ------------ - - LLO,an N M -IR ??w 06054 09.13.2066 N LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN `°"S°"""' 311 REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A GENERAL NOTES I 1.2 1 3 4 5 2 -0 l B B. 9 II I'-0' -II S4 -2 VP 30-0 C-tl V•d V-2* di' 9d' d" O'-3 V!' lJ-5 uY I O KEYNOTES p I 1 . 111111 MIIfY f4Np.IfS. 2 "" W Tff " Tp" TEE IN TW1N1ttN 3 II _-_-_- .- Ir , _-__ - _ - _ - --+.-_-_ -_- . 1. EWE OE 9IE ABOVE 3. WDSCAR - SEE WE PLW L L L L J ? -f- -L-L -- 11- 1L -----L-- -? L - - - --- - - ---- -- II I I I r?--- r --t- r--- -1- r-- - -- -r- -?-- fi - ----------- -? --o ? - -? - ---- - ------ I - II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II III I I I I I % AOJl NEE i I II l III I 'flT -? I I l • i i i ? ' 4,a ? I ? I I i I I? 6?,}? ' i i ,I - - I I ?- L - - I ----- I ---?- - - - - - - - I - FT -?- -I- - - - --------L----- --- I III I I I ? 9g1 NYI I III E? I I I I I I ? I I 1 II ? III I I I I I I II I ? II 3 --- --- --- ---- ? I I I III II I ?II ?' I . r ? I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _? f' I I I I I 1 w --?---- III -?-? W - - ll ®.? -?]----- -- ---- - ---- ---?- - ?--- - I ?- - - --I- - ------------------ ----0 , , ORIGINAL i 1 II $ RECENED II - I III '? - - - I - I j- - - - I - I I -'? - I - - - - ------------ - - - o SEP 141006 i II PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER r + - - I- ------r------ -4- --- ---?- f- - --- ----I - - I- - ?-- --- - I - ? - ------- }------- ---- 11 I I LEVEL 13 AND 14 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT 1 CONDOMINIUM 1 1 I I I ------- N s1o?w?.? mnoWmuM ---- - - - - - 1 - - - I - I 'L t- fi _----- _ _-_-_ -_- --- _-_- ?_ -?-_ _ -.- .-_-_ -_-_-.-_-. -_-- COLLMAN&KARSKV I ARCHITECTS I I L L Al0 ONSCARNA MW.. WFE 00• TNPA R 336N• WKE(OOW42O -FA (W)INMfflO --bku wuw.mlmma9ywn m-"I. P IYmm L L - - ?- L LL - ------ -- L ----- ---j- _L--- ---- ----- -?- - - - ------ - -- ----- ------------- --- A C urswe 06054 .TE 09.13.2066 LEVEL 13 AND 14 FLOOR PLAN ` SUIT "t 2 ^' I'? WTES REVISED DEVELOPMEW ORDER A31 GENERAL NOTE5 xnd T 2 2 Q Q Q QQ Q ?? re' P-o ax o-r ' t 3'i" Bd n'a' ?-n 9d ' Stld , rd ? 1 Mi' aa' 3Y v I 0 O KEYNOTES II T I 'T ---.T_-_-_ - TI D -------- J-.L_-_-_ f _-.-.-_-_- -.T--_- -_ -0 h h 1 2.. w"C "n' 01?° D"5. 3. Tp" aWTMES 3 WD TEpAWMd. A NEMSIIB/ 5. 111ROYdPE • SFE 511E NM L l L Liz- J L - - ?- - - L - - - - ----- - - - - - - L---- . ----- F? -- -- - - -- ---- -------- -- T - -I - i T --. T - - _T - - -----l-------- -I -- ---- -- I - - ?- f T - I - - - T - - ----- T --- I ---- T_ ----0 4 -? - -1- Tr - ?T - - - -------1----- --- ------ -- [- - ?- - - - --T - - I I I III I I I I I I I I II .? I I • ?I I l l i t 1 ? ? ?1 ? - I -- ----- ----o I j- - I -f j III - - - - i - - - - -- -- - - I j---------- I ? ?I ? ?I II III ?I I I I ?I ® I ?I I I ? ? ?I I I I I I I .j -I--L.? .? - I ?- - L - - L--------- ----L--- ------o un n' x 0 III tor. I ( R II I I I II III I ?I II J I I I I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o ? I I I I I I Y x , ?-- , l I I I ? I? - I - I --- - ?I -----? ? ?I -? , I - I I -- ---- I -- - -- 0 ORIGINAL I I RECEIVED I ti III SEP 14 2006 ?}-- H - - ---- ---------- -? - -- - - ---- - -- - ---0 - PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING I I CITY OF CLEARWATER II II I II I . > ° .----+---- I ---4- ------ ---------- ?NEEt4ml --.-_ -0 ---- -------- -- -. ---_ -.---- I I I I I LEVEL 15 FLOOR PLAN ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM _-_-_ --_ -.-.I -_--? COM1 E9, GwNiEW BOIILEVIfaI DOwHwM r-T'- --i--T ?IJ -_- I a • --_-• _-•-_---• -_ ARCHITECTS L 1 IL L - - - - _ UG A`L M PIALL F1 ..WE ¢o• to PAE-3MM-V 12,(MM7lxoo • ra (WkNDEEo and aha Ydka vH.um.wm wu dEmYm - - - -. - --------- - ?p 06054 IAI 09.13.2066 LEVEL 15 FLOOR PLAN °'"'"'""i SCnR W - rd "°? REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A313 GENERAL NOTE5 0 KEYNOTE5 0 1 N49?? 0 ORIGINAL RECENED SEP 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ??ROOF LAN wu, imp . ra umFs ROOF PLAN ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM T91 G-EWeainum aaxoouinura L- COLLMAN&KARSKV ARCHITECTS tld AN]MF ALA NF BUREd W TAWqFL 3 ??. u??I??F X (WAMdILO ea MLW1m 0. P£ASON HO kN401 nx C6054 09.15.2066 .--T-T REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A315 PROJECT r NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION wLE, Iro . au li E Wm Em TO °FFl1f4AI Fa MAW., IETIEDB AND WTAlATON AEWA1ilm RR BW 1m RRIX i01.1NIlI}E AI6, MR TO "R PWA'DED WL LACS.(NC) AL T NTWI I'mala NETIORS 3tm REM M Aril Ma. OM MER To NAM PLA%AD ¢ ATY am ONG MR To NAM PLAA AID EUVATMM3 am Ara REFER TO BFIAPW DMIrWe NM TRA Pe:nEc O PROJECT KEYNOTES O APm rol?nE DNA almoo aA ABAANTI UMTAN NAL aA fAl'AEIE WAN PAINTED M42 ALUM. STOMRNT I DM 5 TB1 OM ON AllA1AAN I AA%YIDIG m0R AlA1NA1 I AABB 91lrE31D OOR AVA WAS a9E as AILANAI NwN AlIM" XM mA AIA61N NbT MM ALANEN LOV451 Wa am ALL"" RA W. SnTEM aN All"WTI ma am A TMAO9A56 PALM 915811 MN AWDIUI DH ATM 611E NTM OPAal BARN CWM F"M aDS AUAWM D@RATNE 617E 00 AM NN1 A3RllTllOb FlNBN OAR as Igl?i METAL I= PANRD AAA 3WWAL AABMOllR1 M% Nm% A45M AND ClIMM BA MR Ti UW%AK DRANWZ aA mm DK MATTRE MUM p1D4 PAST mm "DAWAI aID aN THARITNE 13A WLL W ATNE TR11 flA RW TLP Arc EaWDNf. aA M I Dm DBCMATNE TM ON31 E074M MA am COMM LINTS. YRE" 1A AA%IfNATE FA141 ACME am 3- REVEAL aN QO NADAI DEMUTM 5LL P1R DHWATNE IEAO Yee 1. CUM"gB fW-41 To W FARM NM ME" W0 1. MMS AM OTIO aNATM DEIMTNE BB1883 TO BE WOW WV5TOE BNBO1 ORIGINAL RECEM SEP 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM 69f WLFNEW9WLEVIRD CAADNNNM ARCHITECTS 43q AV-JON PLAZA Fi . 6JAE IW- TAMPA FL. 33634• WKM TBDRN]E -FUG(BO)WOW vrAlv4HtelP,alhmkmky,um• hdtei uaxAml/r,v?-Irmky.[am M CW18A x NvaNx a rraarv 06064R 09.13.2066 D?M6Lf,AM, REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A400 ? W ATCN : AP-W PROJECT GENER ON, GDVA Imo er WOO M mm Wm To SM fwm Fm mw Di KE1 M A MSTAIJATaI 46BM1rcP1 fOP *I. ALL N NM N PPD)FU Kmmo. Wm wm To FIIDP PUNS Am 9EVAl WOO MID aw. i0 FLAP iW5 ANO FIEVAigb Mrs. am R TO DA'AP?l OPAYIPYE FM 1RN Pwnus. D PROJECT K Hm WIWFTE .. ... aA /dRETE Ca" PANED JAm WARS MA AU~ FmT mm ALAS WVING 5Mi01 Aim AlMAMA.Cb PA" 5151M Mm NIAENAI DLCMA GTE MIN A'IAE BRAG MA, N41NMOgAM 611E MA Mua Ixrx. Eu>e PANmD DNA KM MARS A9 WIN5m5 ... MA DFEMMi CALM Mm mm P05T am m THE PFA(CEm MA N OM MTNE 1PN1 aA W10M / OAA DM MTK iot 'A (N J345 am r P.EVEV. aA B' PEYTAL am WVN DEdm5u M.D OXR OHWATAE MAO In15 I, f81FlID1" FM5N TO BE PANTED Wn IEW1N W45 21FAD AND OtM MINATEN OMMATNE D1Mf IM TO mf .SMMTDES ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 14 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM ?? 7 EEXTERIOR ELEVATION SGl& tA' . Ad Imo ARCHITECTS ABA MZ7MPIAEAFIW WILE IW-luP0.PL 336N•VL>rE: (EDkM7K0• FAX(bDMMmOE 1: vdilalPWhm-Emly.wn • W[h Y: uuw,WFm-Imky.4m M cw,N 061 054 C-TAM REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER I A401 ,A ft"ATp . A7.1T PROJECT GENERAL NOTE5 W, 6084A AT6 W DIVOC4 W. Q42ft M A DY" mm F.9FA TO WFQYA110s FM MYIF., tET1FU5 AD R9TAIAT81 FFO N FOR 9m NM RFER TO LQV.A E a F8R TO ODYI P9 m CML o ..(wp ALL rtes MMN PFOKT IHTDRS. um ISFx 10 CMl are. am REFER TO FMR PIA6 AND MAias am Wfi. R8EY 70flmR MA15 Aa 9FAT06 ars 0.m RBFR T09NAT81 W/YDICS FLY 1PD P9WR15, D PROJECT KEYNOTES ReA court To MW" aA AA1an O.YFAA AUL ma aau¢ OwA PAww MM Ao. STORUR T 19RRy STSi AA am NAINAF I UAW 5LA" WR AIAIaeT l OA55 5RFI8118 PPR DIVA mks am am AM" Av6 AInaAT IA/FR mA A8W01llbf am AIeINAT LAAHl OmR mm ANWRI RAXM MTM aAl AEM81 DRY am AUYIR4/A RAUNG. 575191 mm AUWRI WfMA GAU MITI WAIF BAO]G WAR FyAb am AIIRYIRI Fdm.ATW GATE M. ! ®BIF9mb F11Y1 MER RU Wll MA 41UW M7AL WM Po00 W'A nwn ACl Ca;9; o DNA ABAt c0157Q10 aA m m aIIMTM cmim OA - ER M IADSCAK LRWW.5 am p8i MST Clem 1f01Ta:Al ,A ?? TMOF15 Mll EHWATTFF 8A R TM M EAM89 . %j% A am OR carrva A1M TRFl OI OVlP J1XIS ;a E?ykg am r? 2* w x LA AF%AM1E AaNWILE. am r RDFW ma mb IYttM WfAMihE 58 OYA p[mYA1M VFW 1. cBDWlms FN'A M M PAKTM AYFE VEM S i. MM AND OYFR B"ATM RIWATAE 988115108E LAm, SADSTOW ENUa ORIGINAL RECEIVED SEP 14 2006 'LANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ENCFIANTMEM CONDOMINIUM WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION v LM . 0'-w warm ARCHITECTS 4301 AmrgR PLAZA FA]I &MI[0•fA7AR33/H•wFi:(e9)aAmAa-FAX l01)xOL01Ye evl: vdil¢lalkra?-ka,ky--u.b."; uFVUtoIFmmlmsAysRr, M Camsa 06054 09.13.2066 REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORM A402 ? ELEVATION : 4rP-ly ORIGINAL RECOM SEP 141006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER s * 9 EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCAM la' . R-0' N3rm 00m REFER TO SPFAFKATOO FAR -.: , M iw 06TALATIR NRS WN ALL ROW NTNII PMW RTTORS. am A R To FLOOR PLW MD pkVATM am wm TO FLOOR PL" AM OEVAT00 OM MM RETER TO aVATIPI V AM FOR TIM PRFIIS. O PROJECT >"m aA[RNE aA CACREiE CaNN PAafFD WVn WTALS aW IM-I~ Rp am AWOIIf RA fl51FA am AIIR'MR:A'dA36 A.Vldlo 515M an AWNVI MfDRATNE GR NIXWMh RFA:Ra as lnlN DFLOPAINE UTE an IgIDX tRTN ttOR PIIPAFD aA WMATWE COUM Mm OeW POST am VIKOWK WMT75 aD4 NVL DWMTWE TRR an Wcow /ODOR Wf THE TRDI an fArIR0. JaTS, am Z- an 3-UVIA aA NRCN a TWE SIM NID am DOOR DNWATWE l IEK. A30 FNSX TO a PAFTFA NOTE WERW"25 7. TARE AW a FINATOL DB=ATWE III.Erm TO a cam SA"Tat Sh2lA EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ENCHANTMENT CONDOMINIUM 6R-w- ?RWX COLLMAN&KARSKY ARCHITECTS 4301A`L?M PJSA PTKIJ'r. PORE IM. TA`AA FL 33634• VONP:(SBXU -I"(0M,10100 vdi4 tOwIl -kink -- 0ebhiN: uwa:.mll-k-ky- AAmim rtvsul rZ;Z 06054 ADX3X4,AV, REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER A403 ERAL NOTES oq: GPPM 4 ND eA Daeal 1300 Rll6 TO LMNUPE [N'G Wm REt6l To aN NmV WL a tft) 30m P.fFER TO aVW Wfb. 0 as WATDORI WAN W mm N 5TWFF0.M/om mTEK MM N "/ 0056 YLDPO DOOR MN AllN /a 4WM DOOR an NIAINAI WIDOW an NAT LOVER MOT ALL IdVHt DOOR MDT N3RTNIT DOOR aVAI FWM 0Ta tCBfMn"FNSX-a0- vAb 9%D VnOROETOd WA ROER M LAN)YAPE DU4N o m mowKk 23.0 RUT TOP A/C WfftW. 31A Afl%n RAW WIDE PRE-CON57RUCTIONPRICING- STAGE 1 LOOR FLOOR 6 15 UNIT 1 2.6 Bay 2.2 Bay UNIT 2 L 3.55 B 3.4 B - UNIT 3 3.35 B&B 2.9 B&B UNIT 4 4.9 B&B 3.65 B --- UNIT 5 1 2.7 Bay UNIT 6 UNIT - 7 Beach UNIT 8 UNIT 9 UNIT 10 FLOOR 14 2.15 Bay 3.3 B 2.85 B&B 3.55 B 2.65 Bay B&B Beac h .Bay FLOOR 12 2.1 Bay 3.2 B 2.8 B&B 3.45 B 2.6 Bay Bay Bay vi ew FLOOR 11 2.1 Bay 3.15 B 2.75 B&B 3M&72-"M 2.55 Bay FLOOR 10 1.75 Bay 2.2 B&B 3.54 B _ 2.6 B 3.05 B 2.25 B 1.27 B&B 1 Bay 2.25 Ba 2.3 B FLOOR 9 1.725 Bay 2.15 B&B 3.45 B 2.525 B 2.95 B 2.15 B 1.23 Bay -- 0.975 Bay 2.175 Bay 2.225 B FLOOR 8 1.7 Bay 2.1 B&B 3.36 B 2.475 B 2.85 B 2.05 B 1.19 Bay 0.95 Bay 2.1 Bay 2.15 6 FLOOR 7 1.675 Bay 2.05 B&B 3.27 B 1.65 B 2.955 B 1.96 B 1.15 Bay 1.275 B&B FLOOR 6 1.65 Bay 2 B&B 3.18 B 1.6 B 2.87 B 1.94 B 1.1 Bay 1.25 B&B FLOOR 5 1.625 Bay 1.99 B&B 3.09 B 1.55 B 2.785 B 1.92 B 1.05 Bay 1.225 B&B FLOOR FLOOR FLOOR FLOOR 4 3 2 1 1.6 Bay 1.45 Bay 1.98 B&B 1.97 B&B 3 B 2.91 B 1.5 B 1.45 B 2.7 B 1.9 B 1 Bay 1.2 B&B **All prices in USD million "Prices subject to change ! 47 4-, ?YLG??2?7?'l,eyLt RESERVATION AGREEMENT (PRIORITY) ENCHANTMENT, A CONDOMINIUM THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2006, by and between ENCHANTMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address is 790 S. Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33767, as Developer, and as Purchaser, whose address is telephone number / (home), / (office), and tax identification number WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is contemplating selling condominium units at Enchantment, a Condominium, located at 691 S. Gulfview Boulevard, Clearwater, FL 33767, but has not filed and had approved Condominium Documents as required by Chapter 718, Florida Statutes; and WHEREAS, Developer is desirous of giving Purchaser, and Purchaser is desirous of receiving, the right to contract for the purchase of a condominium unit in this proposed development, subject to availability of unsold inventory. Furthermore, Purchaser understands that Developer has separated units into three unit types based on their location in the building with Bayfront units being "A" units, Beachfront units being "AA" units and Grand Beachfront/Penthouse units being "AAA" units. IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Reservation. This Reservation Agreement when signed and delivered to Developer accompanied by the required deposit will reserve to Purchaser the right to execute a Purchase Agreement for the unit type designated hereafter in the Enchantment Condominium, subject to availability of unsold inventory. Developer intends to make a random selection from the reservation holders in each unit type and assign in the order of selection an appointment date and time when the Purchaser will have an opportunity to convert this Reservation Agreement into a formal purchase agreement. Purchaser selects the unit type indicated by an "X": Bayfront unit Beachfront unit Grand Beachfront/Penthouse unit 2. Deposit. Purchaser shall submit to Developer at the time of execution of this Reservation Agreement, a reservation deposit in the amount of $50,000.00 for a "A" Bayfront unit, $100,000.00 for a "AA" Beachfront unit and $150,000.00 for a "AAA" Grand Beachfront/Penthouse unit, which Sales Center. 691 S. Gulfview Blvd, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Development Office: 790 S. Gulfvlew Blvd, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 p. 727.447.5120 or 1.800.298.0696 f. 727.446.9841 EnchantmentClearwaterBeach.com E reservation deposit shall be made by check payable to Richards, Gilkey, Fite, Slaughter, Pratesi & Ward, P.A., attorneys at law, as Escrow Agent, whose address is 1253 Park Street, Clearwater, FL 33756. Escrow Agent must provide the prospective Purchaser with a receipt for the deposit. Unless this agreement is terminated and the deposit returned to Purchaser, deposit will be applied against the purchase price of the condominium unit as specified in the Purchase Agreement. 3. Price and Availability. Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that Developer has not established a purchase price for units in the condominium or the specific benefits to be afforded with the purchase of a unit and that Developer, in its sole discretion, shall have the right to establish the purchase price for units. NO ASSURANCE IS GIVEN AS TO THE PURCHASE PRICE TO BE ESTABLISHED BY THE DEVELOPER FOR ANY PARTICULAR UNIT OR UNIT TYPE, OR THAT ANY UNITS AT ALL WILL BE AVAILABLE TO THE PURCHASER SINCE THE DEMAND FOR UNITS MAY EXCEED THE AVAILABLE UNITS BEING OFFERED BY THE DEVELOPER OR THE DEVELOPER MAY DECIDE NOT TO UNDERTAKE THE OFFERING OF UNITS DESCRIBED IN THIS AGREEMENT. 4. Purchase Agreement. Developer recognizes its obligations to file condominium documents with the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Homes, prior to entering into a binding purchase agreement or lease agreement for more than five (5) years, as required by Chapter 718.502(2)(c)(1), Florida Statutes, and Purchaser shall have a right to receive all condominium documents as required by Chapter 718, Florida Statutes. Only two units are allowed to be purchased per family and/or household. The Purchase Agreement will contain a prohibition of the assignment of the contract or if the purchaser is a trust, corporation, partnership or limited liability company, an assignment of the beneficial interest, stock, partnership units or membership units in the entity until the Developer has contracted to sell all ninety (90) units in the development. Thereafter, assignments shall be authorized subject to Developer's approval and payment of a fee to the Developer of $15,000. 5. Assignment. This Reservation Agreement may not be assigned by Purchaser without the prior written approval of Developer which approval may be withheld in Developer's sole discretion. 6. Termination. This Reservation Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the signing of a Purchase Agreement by either the Purchaser or the Developer by providing written notice of termination to the other party. Upon termination by this Reservation Agreement shall become null and void and of no further force and effect and Purchaser shall have the right of an immediate and unqualified refund of the deposit. 7. Unqualified Refund. Purchaser has a right to an immediate, unqualified refund of any reservation deposit monies paid upon written request to the Escrow Agent. 8. Not a Contract. Purchaser acknowledges that the acceptance of a reservation deposit and this agreement by Developer shall not create in Purchaser any equitable rights in any unit and that this Safes Center: 691 S. Gulfview Blvd, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Development Office: 790 S. Gultview Blvd', * Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 p. 727.447.5120 or 1.800.298.0696 f. 727.446.9841 EnchantmentClearwaterBeach.com V Reservation Agreement is not a purchase agreement to purchase a unit and that Purchaser shall have no right to purchase any unit unless and until Purchaser and Developer mutually enter into a formal purchase agreement. Purchaser agrees not to record this Agreement or any memorandum or notice thereof in the public records and if Purchase violates this provision, Developer may immediately terminate this Agreement and direct Escrow Agent to return the deposit to Purchaser without qualification. Purchaser represents that a copy of this Agreement was delivered to it before it was signed and that it has read this Agreement in its entirety. 9. Oral Representation. Oral representations and agreements are not binding on Developer or Purchaser. Purchaser acknowledges that it is not relying on any oral representations or agreements of the Developer or agents of the Developer (including sales representatives) and that Developer reserves the right to make such changes to the building, units, facilities or improvements of the proposed condominium as it shall deem necessary. 10. Enforcement Proceedings. In the event Purchaser initiates any action or legal proceeding regarding this Agreement, then Purchaser shall be responsible to pay Developer's reasonable attorney fees and costs (through appeal) in defending or responding to said action. 11. Entire Agreement. This Reservation Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Purchaser and Developer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Developer has executed this Reservation form as of the day and year first above written. PURCHASER: Signature Purchaser 1 DEVELOPER: ENCHANTMENT, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: Print name: Title: Printed Name of Purchaser 1 Signature Purchaser 2 Printed Name Purchaser 2 Sales Center: 691 S. Gulfview Blvd, • Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 Development Office: 790 S. Gulfview Blvd, + Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 p. 727.447.5120 or 1.$00.298.0696 f. 727.446.9$41 EnchantmentCleorwaterBeach.coon Farm W-9 Request for Taxpayer Give form to the (Rev. January 2003) Identification Number and Certification requester. Do not send to the tRS. oepamne,x Of Itq ymasu y YMUnaI Rev&m Sarvke N Name m o Business name, If dlffworx from above c 0 a c ° ? IrKWduall 1:1 Sole proprietor ? corporation ? Partnership El other ? ------------------ riate b El Exempt from backup ""thTOldli ox; Check approp Requesters rtarne ana address (optlanall Address (number, street and apt ar su(te no.) c C C . SLu City. state, and 21P code CL List account number(s) here (optiorMll N Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. For individuals, this is your social security number (SSN)- social security number However, for a resident alien, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity. see the Part 1 instructions on page 3. For other entities, it is your employer identification number (EIN). If you do not have a number, or see now to get a TIN on page 3- Note: If the account is in more than one name, see the chart on page 4 for guidelines on whose number Employer Id.rxincation numb.- to enter. Certification Under penalties of perjury. 1 certify that 1. The number shown on this form is my correct taxpayer identification number (or 1 am waiting for a number to be issued to me). and 2. 1 am not subject to backup withholding because: (a) I am exempt from backup withholding. or (b) 1 have not been notified by the Intemal Revenue Service (IRS) that t am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends. or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding. and 3. 1 am a U.S. person (including a U.S. resident alien). Certification instructions. You must cross out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on your tax return. For teat estate transactions. Item 2 does not apply. For mortgage Interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, contributions to an Individual retirement arrangement ORA), and generally, payments other than interest and dividends, you are not required to sign the Certification. but you must provide your Correct TIN. (See the instructions on page 4,) Sign signature Here 0. Date r rpose of Form Pu A person who is required to file an information return with the IRS, must obtain your correct taxpayer identification number (TIN) to report, for example, income paid to you, real estate transactions, mortgage interest you paid. acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, or contributions you made to an IRA. U.S. person. Use Form W-9 only if you are a U.S. person (including a resident alien). to provide your correct TIN to the person requesting it (the requester) and, when applicable, to: 1. Certify that the TIN you are giving is correct (or you are waiting for a number to be issued), 2. Certify that you are not subject to backup withholding, or Nonresident alien who becomes a resident alien. Generally, only a nonresident alien individual may use the terms of a tax treaty to reduce or eliminate U.S. tax on certain types of income, However, most tax treaties contain a provision known as a "saving clause." Exceptions specified in the saving clause may permit an exemption from tax to continue for certain types of income even after the recipient has otherwise become a U.S. resident alien for tax purposes. If you are a U.S. resident alien who is relying on an exception contained in the saving clause of a tax treaty to claim an exemption from U.S. tax on certain types of income, you must attach a statement that specifies the following five items: 1. The treaty country. Generally, this must be the same treaty under which you claimed exemption from tax as a nonresident alien. 3. Claim exemption from backup withholding if you are a U.S. exempt payee. Z. The treaty article addressing the income. Note: if a requester gives you a form other than Form W-9 3. The article number (or location) in the tax treaty that to request your TIN, you must use the requester's form if it is contains the saving clause and its exceptions. substandally similar to this Form W-9. 4. The type and amount of income that qualifies for the Foreign person. If you are a foreign person, use the exemption from tax. appropriate Form W-g (see Pub. 515, Withholding of Tax on S. Sufficient facts to justify the exemption from tax under Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Entities). the terms of the treaty article. Cat. No. 10231x farm W-9 (Rev. 1-200 &'` r 4 z ``` 51 1 ? p M .y The majesty of the Niagara Falls, the grandeur of the Grand Canyon, the raw beauty of the Alaskan Glaciers, the magnificence of the Taj Mahal... natural and man made wonders that leave us speechless and inspire within us a desire to experience the unique and one of a kind! Very rarely this inspiration creates a fusion between the creative vision of man and the beauty of the natural world. This is Enchantment on Clearwater Beach... Florida's breathtaking new icon and residential landmark! Enchantment will stand triumphant as the most ambitious and impressive architectural endeavor ever to grace one of America's top beachfront locations, from its Art Nuevo design and classic rounded articulations to the signature Grand Archway through its superstructure, Enchantment is just that - Enchanting - where the Sun rises and sets on Clearwater Beach! PPI /• ` ;4%, ?vc.?hant?nent On Clearwater Beach, FL x¢ , ?'st r MKIM I n; 77 The -Most S 6GtaGUta1" ArchtltcCtillrc On Anw-Inca's $eaGh.Frost s a member of an exclusive group of Enchantment residents, be welcomed home like royalty by the Grand Archway, towering nearly five stories high, and the awe-inspiring Lobby Rotunda. Be greeted with a smile and comprehensive service of Enchantment's expert concierge. Work out or relax at the state-of-the-art fitness center and spa which includes yoga, aerobic, rain room, steam and sauna - a privileged enchanted lifestyle. Then, take a quiet sunset stroll on the white sandy shore of your private beachfront property with approximately 240 feet of beach at your doorstep. Top the experience off with a bit of refreshment from the Private Dining Room or Champagne Bar for residents only. Then board the elevator with private access directly to your own private foyer and residence! ,_ ow When escape is what you desire, retreat to the extraordinary tranquility that is yours - your personal palace among the clouds. As you enter your home, immerse yourself in the spectacular panorama of your Gulf of Mexico vista. Take comfort with the pride of knowing that no amount of care or craftsmanship was spared in its detailed completion. Wrap yourself in the finest of materials and luxuriously appointed finishes. From the detail and the thematic stainless steel appliances to the granite and marble in your kitchen and master bath, your Enchantment residence represents the pinnacle of an inspirational, tailored living experience. Artists rendering, subject to change without notice n g6nt(!J Ne<stCeA on FCorUa's Jvtost,prist6Le aeach Masterfully tucked aside on the soft white sands of Clearwater Beach's beachfront, enjoy amazing views of lush Sand Key Park, serene sunrises over the dramatic Sand Key Bridge, and dream-inspired sunsets over a shimmering Mexican Gulf. Enchantment, where the sun rises and sets on Clearwater Beach. We invite you to call and make an appointment for a private preview, to reserve your home and to make an important investment in Enchantment at pre-construction prices. Only 90 Private Beachfront Residences is From 1,100 - 4,000 sq. ft. r, Signature Dining Lounge & Champagne Bar is State-of-the-Art Fitness Center and Spa Concierge at Your Service ?= Direct Elevator Access To Your Home's Foyer Pre-Construction Prices from $1 - 5 Million 1-800-298.0696 727-447-5120 www.EnchantmentClearwaterBeach.com BROKER PARTICIPATION WELCOMED 0 Unit 7 1430 sq. ft (Approx.) 2 Bed Unit 6 2600 sq. ft. r-A,,A,ritV 3 Bed Dd Y JIUt Unit 4 1780 sq. ft. (Approx.) 2 Bed Unit 5 2950 sq. ft. Appmv) 3 Bed Beach Side 4 Unit 7 1420 sq. ft. 2 Bed Unit 6 2410 sq. ft. I: Ip?n?uei 2 Bed Bay Side GRAD ULM Unit 3 3445 sq. ft im (,pplo 3 Bed Unit 2 -? 2630 sq. ft. 4 OX., Bed ?U DNW. M i 4 Bay Side Beach Sid( l D f, ±, ? h . `?. xXl / x ?,^... < ?,.l ENCHANTMENT Uday Lele President 790 South Gulfview Blvd Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 T 727.447.5 120 F. 727.443.3493 tidayl@enchanttnentcondos. com . ?