The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-070660 Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE 1$ ,205.00 0 CASE #: F-1-.D o?Oc)S-- o ?-066 DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION O R I G I IV Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05) -PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Jerry & Teresa Tas MAILING ADDRESS: 342 Hamden Drive Clearwater FL $3767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-446-9397 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zavac, P.E., RLA MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road, Ste 404, Safety Harbor. FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: keithfteithzavac.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) RECEVED STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 342 Hamden Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached 05 (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) :? PARCEL NUMBER: See Attachment A PLMNINGDE MEfVT PARCEL SIZE: CITY OF C 1 G Dl AMP (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT:_17 con ominium units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment B Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) • 0 ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment C 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and'Rajalfftationluimpacts, on adjacent properties. OCT I A 7005 See Attachment C PLp?N c ? 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Attachment D r 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Attachment D 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Attachment D 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. E C E /f D / ED F\ - See Attachment D OCT 14 2005 .1 Y .......- -,-I #-,JJJ%JJWNK.B MM CITY OF CLEARWATER E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design C Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involy addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance wit the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage. Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemptio to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan tequirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): x Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) El SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; ILIiucl I+?? "v'I North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; hC? 14 20 5 Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; O CT Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; PLANNING DEPARTMENT T All existing and proposed points of access; CITY OF CLEARWATER All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; ORIbINAL Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. RECEIVED OCT 14 2005 pLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • ORIGINAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 1`9. SIGNS /Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable. (separate application and The required). ? Reduced s'ignage proposal (8 %. X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC 1MPAC.T STUDY:. (Section 4-202.A..13 and 4-804.0) ? Include if :required :by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1,000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a: nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five: (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (172) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping: Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the: Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgementof traffic impact, study requirements. (Applicant must initfal one of the following): Traffic ..mpact Study is. included. The study must include a summary.table: of pre= and' post=development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement<at all ;intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. A Traffic1moact Study is not required. CAUTIQN IF `APPLICATIO.N REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR' A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. . iA'ND NONE HAS B.EE'N SUibMITTED., ARPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DEL-AY'M'AY OCCUR: If you have questions regarding th.`ese req y ks Administration Engineering Department. at: (727) 562-4750. OCT ] 4 2005 L. SIGNATURE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1, the undersigned acknowledge'that all rlt ti RTER STATE OF FLORIDA,'cOUNTY OF PINELLAS application are true and. accurate to the bes of my know edge and SWprn to and subscribed before:. m this day of authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property? A.D. 20?to me andYOr by described in this appticaffon. v Ys persorialfy known has produced as identification. owner or rep{?ent" Notary public, ;.:.RY •..,, commission expires: ;oti*,•;!r?•. DEBORAH GAPONE. ?` f MY COMMISSION # 2491 i - EXPIRES: September 11, 2007 ^'•!E a i'N,Bonded 7hru Notary Public Underwriters Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development. Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • t ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) See attachment E for list of requests 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keithth F?-Ziyac-P-E., Ll? as (his/their) agent(s) :to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we)., the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and co t. Prope - wrier Property Owner Property Owner :property Owner S:T.ATE. OF FL0?2IDA.? _ _ COUNTY OF PkNELLA:S ?_$store rime the uncle stgpp a officer duly commissioned b laws of the State. of Flor on this day of rsonallyappeared . >?/'?5'? ?` e ?r?? whohavmg;been frst-duly-§worn i? w Deposes and says t at he/she fully understands the.contents ofthe affidavit that ne/sbe signed - t ry bhc M Commisslom'Expfres aY ?1?' ??MMISStON p,DD249149:- _ :+ •)i?l --------- ------ --------- ?fide?7hru Notary Pu6hc Undar}rrlfer?s . . WED SAPlanning DepartmenMpplication Form 'development reviewVlexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc OCT 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT A PARCEL NUMBERS 08/29/15/17586/001/0110 08/29/ 15/ 17604/000/0070 RECEIVED OCT 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ? r ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Increase in height from 35 ft to 72'-2" from FEMA to midpoint of roof. • Decrease in front (north) pavement setback from 15 ft to 0 ft. • Reduction in lot width from 100 ft to 50 ft. • Termination of non-conformance for 29 overnight accommodations and conversion to 17 multi-family condominium units. RECEIVED OCT .14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OFCLEgRWATER Keith ?ayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Gem Tower Stormwater Narrative 0 ORIGINAL 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com The stormwater system is designed to treat the first half-inch of runoff from the site, and attenuate the 25 year 1 hour storm event. The system consists of one normally dry pond. The site runoff is directed to the ponds by sheet flow and underground piping. The peak discharge is attenuated by a control structure prior to discharge to the public right of way. RECEIVED OC (* 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ATTACHMENT C ORIGINAL GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed Andalusian architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 17 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the surrounding previously approved projects 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate. development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Coronado Drive, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 17 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the existing 29-unit motel development. There are no proposed uses other than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The parking is designed within a fully within the project site and uses only two 24-foot wide driveways. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the project. The proposed parking garage is two stories tall and incorporates a partially submerged garage to minimize the surface building footprint and parking lot pavement area. The proposed 26 parking spaces meet the re uired arkin spaces required by code. ? ? ? ED OCT 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The surrounding parcels along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive are primarily older motel developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by conforming with Andalusian flavor suggested by City code. 6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage with no direct access exterior parking. The project only contains 17 residential units, and will not include any commercial or other businesses. RECEIVED OCT 14 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • • ORIGINA ATTACHMENT D RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and development standards. The applicant is requesting an increase in height from 35'-0" to 72'-2" and a reduction in minimum lot width. The property is an existing motel property with a front minimum width of 50 ft. The building width is designed to accommodate a 24 ft wide driveway, 26-19 ft parking spaces and associated stairs and trash room, which are fixed in dimension. The number of parking spaces to accommodate the unit mix and city parking codes dictates the building depth. The remaining open space, which exceeds code minimum, is heavily landscaped with minimal grass to offset the requested setback deviations. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of each unit are well in excess of $500,000, which will increase the property values of the neighborhood. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi- family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use designation RECENED OCT 14 2905 PLATING DA ART CI1V OF CLEARW ? 0 ORIGINAL 5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The applicant of this project has operated this property for some time and is the owner of the property. They are committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using Andalusian themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City. The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping includes a combination of palms, hedges and shrubs, which fully encompass the property. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to lot width and height increase are requested for this project. The property has been owned for a long duration of time by the applicant and is working with their existing property constraints to create a project that fits the property and is consistent with other recently approved projects within the area. ?M MID c? a - (D C ?C ?C a • 0 ORIGINAL The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into an enclosed parking garage under the 'living units. This will enhance the capacity of the existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior parking. The requested setback flexibility is offset by the landscape package. The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in many cases.' This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas,' except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that surrounds the building and mitigates for the setback flexibility. The building height is offset by the stepped fagade of the building along with the enhanced Andalusian theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated without the City preferred architectural theme. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required parking per standard code would be provided on-site. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) The proposed building consists of a low-density 17 unit multi-family project and does not include any retail uses. The building being 72'-2" ft above FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as a mid-rise building consistent with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of development. The project includes all required parking on-site and within the building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Coronado. The architecture of the building isf enen all Andalusian in nature, which is consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees, which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved projects along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors. 6RDIECHN/ED V 14 2DE-5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Hickey 10/13/2005 CITY OF CLEARWATER Gem Tower 420-05 STORMWATER CALCULATIONS 10/13/2005 1 Required Treatment Acreage Square Feet 1/2 inch Cu Feet Acre Feet 0.350 15269.21 0.5 636 0.015 <Amount needed to treat 2 Attenuation FDOT ZONE VI: Tc=60 min i=3.7 inches per hour C existing calculation: Square Feet C 6324 Existing pavement area (sfl @ 0.49 3098.76 6336 Existing building areas (SF) @ 0.49 3104.64 0 Existing pond area (sfl @ 1.00 0 2609 Existing pervious area (sfl @ 0.20 521.8 sum 6725.2 0.44 <Existing C C proposed calculation: 1472 Paved area (sfl @ 0.95 0.98 1442.56 7192 Building areas (SF) @ 0.5 0.98 7048.16 816 Pond area (sfl @ 1.0 1.00 816 5789.21 Pervious area (sfl @ 0.2 0.20 1157.842 sum 10464.562 0.69 <Proposed C Volume needed = tiA (C.p -Ce) t 3600 i 3.7 . 0 M A 15269.21 © 1 C: r-? 0 - Cp 0.69 Cu Feet (Acre Feet) -n - Ce 0.44 1143 0.026 <Volume needed for storage M rn m ? G7 z ? I* Hickey 3 Pond Volume O 3 mm m o c-: 1 Q/13/2005 • Pond To Elevation 4.50 Water table 2,5 Pond Bottom Elevation: 3.00 Area of Pond at To El. s : 1,402.00 0.03 K sand rmeabilt ,ft per hr : 1.67 Area of Pond at B ottoms : 816.00 0.02 Side Sloe 4 Safe Factor dimensionless : 2 Increment 0.50 1819 V AVG. FLOW AREA OF AVERAGE AT ET E hM Ah TOTAL ENGTH THR HYDRAULIC POND BOTTO FLOW FLOW INCR. TOTAL ELEV. TOTAL HEAD INCR. HEAD VOLUME OND BOTTO GRADIENT A=(L)(h) Q=KiA (Q1+Q2)12 TIME TIME (NGVD) (ft) (ft) (co (ft) i=h/lava (w) (cfh) (cfh) (hrs.) (hrs.) 4.500 1.750 0.075 1664 2.00 0.875 0.0 0.0 0 0 4.425 1.675 0.075 1559 2.00 0.838 816.0 570.6 285.32 0.365 0.365 ....._..._...,............... ........................ 4.350 ....._.._......_ ....._.._ 1.600 .._.....,..... __.......... ._... 0.075 ...-....... _..... ._....._.._ 1458 2.00 0.800 816.0 545.1 557.86 0.183 0.547 ..,.....,.,.......,.. _...................,_._...._,. 4.275 . ,,. ._......_-......... . .. .._ , ...,.._._....._,..._........_.. 1.525 .__.,......_._._ .. ,._.......... 0.075 . . . _._.......... . . _......... ...................__.._ ,._...,.._....... 1358 . .. . .___.... 2.00 _......... __.__._._...._._. 76_3 0. 816.0 519.5 .... ....... _. - _- ._... 532.31 ._,....._,._..._ ..._..._. 0.187 .._........ _.............. _ 4 0. 73 ... . . . ... . 4.200 1.450 ...... .... . 0.075 .. .. .... . .. 1260 2.00 _ 0.725 816.0 494.0 506.76 - W? 0.192 _ _ 0.927 ......,....._..........._..... ...... ....................... 4.125 _.........,.........._...,,.,..._... 1;.375 ...........-.....,....................... ..... ....,,,... 0.075 _.,..........._,,..-....__,.....,, ......... _ 1165 2.00 ,_.,....,.._..._.......... 0.688 816.0 468.4 .. ._ .... _....__....--- 481.21 ---._.__.._......... 0.198 ...... ....... __.,.__....... 1.125 4.050 1.300 0.075 1072 2.00 0.650 816.0 442.9 455.66 0.204 1.329 ..._...,.,,,,,......,...._.._,,............. . 3.975 ... __.... _...... __ ......__ ._.._...,.....__....__,_.. 1 225 .. . .. __.._._..._ - -- ............,,,...._......._..,...._.,....... 0.075 _. __. _._ _ ..._._..,, ........................_,................_. 981 ..._.. .... .. _._ . . .. 2.00 W M 0.613µ L _ _..? _. _ 816.0 417.3 430.11 ... 0.211 1.54 0 .. ?. 3.900. . 1.1 50 -- - , 007 5 .. . . .. _ 893 2.00 .. ._ 0.575 _ 816.0 391.8 ....... .._ 404.56 0.219 _ _ _ 1.759 ...,_........_.............. _. 3.825 _......... ........_._......._..... 1.075 _.._„_.. 0.075 ....._.._.... _..... _..._............ ._.?............ 806 2.00 _? _..._...__._..-_.._.. 0.538 816.0 366.2 ?_...? _,_ .. 379:01 _.,_ _ _._.._....... 0.228 ._.?_..._._...,.._. 1.988 3.750 1.000 0.075 722 2.00 0.500 816.0 340.7 353.46 0.238 2.226 3.675 0.925 0.075 640 2.00 0.463 816.0 315.1 327.90 0.250 2.476 _..._.._..._...._....._...._......,....._.._ 3.600 ._._.,......__,.,...._ . 0.850.._ .............,....... ..................................... 0.075 ._..__,_......,..__,_..__ ....._....,._ 560 2.00 .__._...._.__...._...,_ 0.425 816.0 289.6 ___ __ 302.35 _.__..._._ 0.264 __..._.... ....... _....._._ 2.741 .... ..... ......_ .._ ....._ ............. 3.525 ._....._..._._................. 0.775 ... 0.075 482 2.00 0.388 816.0 264.0 276.80 0.281 3.021 ................................ ..._ _,.............,..... 3.450 ._...._....._......_................... 0300 ....... ............ .... .,.._.._._............ 0.075 ,_..........,........ ._.__........ ........... .......... 407 2-00 ........... .........,_._.__................ 0.350 816.0 238.5 ._........... _..._.__...._. 251.25 _..___._...._.._.. 0.300 ............._........... _...... _... 3.-322 3.375 0.625 0.075 333 2.00 0.313 816.0 212.9 225.70 0.325 3.646 _...,......... ............................... 3.00 -3, ,........_._.,......_......._...... _0.550 _......,_,...........,__..._.,_...,.. 0.075 ._..... ...................._....... _,, . 262 2.00 .....,............,_............,. 0.275 816.0 187.4 _..........._.._._....._.. 200.15 ....... ....... 0.355 4.001 3.225 0.475 0.075 193 2.00 0.238 816.0 161.8 174.60 - 0.395 4.396 ..__,.,...... . .............. 3.150 .._............._......_ .......... 0.400 __.....,_.. _,_........ _.._..... 0.075 ................_....,-..,_,,..,.....__....._. 127 2.00 ....,_....__._......_,............. 0.200 816.0 136.3 149.05 -___...... ,..,..._....... 0.447 ..._..,___.._...-............. 4.843 ----------------- 3.000 ------------- 0.250 ----- ----------- 0.000 _ ........ .. _. II 2.00 --------------- 0.125 5.2 - 110.72 - ---1.145-- -- 5.989-- ........ .._...................... .-......,. ... POND TREATMENT VOLUME RECOVERS IN: 6.0- HOURS NOTE: A SAFETY FACTOR OF "2" IS APPLIED TO "K" ?J T? Hickey 4 Weir Calculations Q existing C existing i A 0.570372272 0.4404419 3.7 0.35 Width of weir (ft) Weir factor 1.08 312 Q 0.169 3 1.122368923 0.570372272 Width of weir (inches) 2.0 5 Elevation of weir Area Avg. Area Volume Acc. Vol. Trt. Vol. Weir: Elevation (Ac) (Ac) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) Elevation 3.00 0.0187 0.00000 0.0204 0.0102 3.50 0.0221 0.01020 0.0255 0.012725 0.0146 3.67 4.00 0.0288 0.02293 0.0305 0.01525 4.50 0.0322 0.03818 0% z R7 _ oz 0 n v M r a -a ' a mm M 4 Calculated Weir Elevation: 3.67 Ft 1011'3/2006 9 0 1 Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205. 00 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ORIGINAL Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Jerry & Teresa Tas MAILING ADDRESS: 342 Hamden Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-446-9397 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Jerry Tas. Teresa Tas (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zayac. P.E.. RLA MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road. Ste 404. Safety Harbor, FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 342 Hamden Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL NUMBER: PARCEL SIZE: (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) (acres, PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 21 condominium units ` (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment B Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) PLANNING & DEVE i ' . P.?.. 1 T `'!f;'. CITY OF Ctzr it Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005-- City of Clearwater • 4b ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TOR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail': 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. J UL 0 1 2005 j See Attachment C PLANNING & DEVT!' Of . ,: `..i T Syrs ...,, . ed it.Alui. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Attachment D Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • • ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infiil project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Attachment D 3. The uses within the comprehensive infiil redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent I'and uses. See Attachment D 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infll redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infiil redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function t *(An a ci e immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. U See Attachment D iVL 5 I 8. - r-Yid: Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. See Attachment D Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that in) addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with the of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption to requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; T All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal) of Florida Registered Professional' Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initiat one of the following): / Stormwater plan as noted above is included provided. Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; -3 TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, eluding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing frees; /OCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance ?- with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ZGRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as Gr SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) D P ? nr7 SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed! 24" x 367): ' l All dimensions; _ North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; 11110 2?I05 Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; PLANNING g DEVcL.OPhit ;,-j? SVCq Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; CITY QF CLE j; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; of 7- Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed! sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.), and _// Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan:. One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining wall's and earth beans; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory: oreoared by a "certified arborist". of all trees 8" DBH or greater. reflecting size. canoov (drio lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) f .^ ??- ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: _17_7V9_ (" All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; RtlR,. t Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; j;« Q LtiU? Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; & SVC Proposed and required parking spaces; i..,, CANOFt+++N++?L'•=? Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical' and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 %X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005 City of Clearwater 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infrll Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program: application, as applicable (separate application and. fee required.). C D ?? ? Reduced signage proposal (8'/ X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.1.3 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the pro posed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (iTE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a °Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. x Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE:. I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. property owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS </ &wnrp to and subscribed before this p20 day of ?? A. D. 20V?to me and/or by vie is personally known has produced ?i as identification. Y2 I Notary public, MIN commission expires: MY COMMISSION # DD24911! EXPIRES: September 11,2007 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwril Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infrll Application 2005- City of Clearwater • % ORIGINAI AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) See attachment E for list of requests 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith €_Zayae, R.F., RI-A as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and co Prope caner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS 4efore me the unde signed, officer duly commissioned _bY laws of the State of FIofJa, on this p?8 day of ,ersonally appeared e I"P ?. who having been first duty sworn Deposes and says t at he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. G??90HAH CAPONE ry blic My Commission Expires: F my COMMI5SI0N # DD 249119 -? WIRES. RADMMbas ?_ 6 ? t? B4ttdetl'fhru Notrry Aubttc tlnQMrrltersl? S:1Planning DeparhnenAApplication Fonrnsldevelopment reviewlflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc l"J r ?.. i PLANNING & dt ?, .? t.. , d F SVC : - . QTYCAF C L-:. r??.ts Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ATTACHMENT A PARCEL NUMBERS 08/29/15/17586/001/0110 08/29/ 15/ 17604/000/0070 • ORIGINAL ft a ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Increase in height from 35 ft to 82'-4" from FEMA to midpoint of roof. • Decrease in front (east) pavement setback from 15 ft to 5.0 ft. • Decrease in front (north) pavement setback from 15 ft to 2.36 ft. • Decrease in side (south) pavement setback from 10 ft to 0.00 ft. • Reduction in lot width from 100 ft to 50 ft. ORIGINAL. • • ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT C GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed Andalusian architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 20 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the surrounding previously approved projects 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Coronado Drive, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 20 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the existing 29-unit motel development. There are no proposed uses other than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The parking is designed within a fully within the project site and uses only two 24-foot wide driveways. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the project. The proposed parking garage is two storys tall and incorporates a car lift to minimize the building footprint and parking lot pavement area. The proposed 30 parking spaces meets the required parking spaces required by code. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for develo t. "U" p 1 PLAN .7 /??7 a tCJCr:?I?r?I4i?`..?E.[•1pT SYy"' • r The surrounding parcels along Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive are primarily older motel developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by conforming with Andalusian flavor suggested by City code. 6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage with no direct access exterior parking. The project only contains 20 residential units, and will not include any commercial or other businesses. ORIGINAL ? L?UVY1.1 & DEVROPmENTS OF CLEEA 3MIE4-.. ?7 w ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT D RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and development standards. The applicant is requesting an increase in height from 35'-0" to 82'-4", reduction in minimum lot width and a reduction of the front and side pavement setbacks. The property is an existing motel property with a front minimum width of 50 ft. The building width is designed to accommodate a 24 ft wide driveway, 30 19 ft parking spaces, car lift and associated stairs and trash room, which are fixed in dimension. The number of parking spaces to accommodate the unit mix and city parking codes dictates the building depth. The remaining open space, which exceeds code minimum, is heavily landscaped with minimal grass to offset the requested setback deviations. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of each unit are well in excess of $500,000, which will increase the property values of the neighborhood. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi- family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use designation ?.... C-? L . ?? 01 2C5 PLANNING ......-_ CITY • ?)RIGINAL 5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The applicant of this project has operated this property for some time and is the owner of the property. They are committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using Andalusian themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City. The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping includes a combination of palms, hedges and shrubs, which fully encompass the property. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height increase are requested for this project. The property has been owned for a long duration of time by the applicant and is working with. their existing property constraints to 0 1 2M . ........... 46 ORIGINAL create a project that fits the property and is consistent with other recently approved projects within the area. The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into an enclosed parking garage under the living units. This will enhance the capacity of the existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior parking. The requested setback flexibility is offset by the landscape package. The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that surrounds the building and mitigates for the setback flexibility. The building height is offset by the stepped fagade of the building along with the enhanced Andalusian theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated without the City preferred architectural theme. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required parking per standard code would be provided on-site. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) The proposed building consists of a low-density 20 unit multi-family project and does not include any retail uses. The building being 82'-4" ft above FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as a mid-rise building consistent with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of development. The project includes all required parking on-site and within the building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Coronado. The architecture of the building is generally Andalusian in nature, which is consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees, which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved projects along the beach and do not ir. cl der y wild.or.obtrusive colors. JUL 0 1 721CCIGUZ n & DEVEl.CF'NENTSVCSI OFCl.?c,:ai- tz:?kMN.... C4GINAL Page 1 of 1 08 / 29 / 15 / 17586 / 001 / 0110 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 12:04:22 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TAS, JERRY OBK: 07473 OPG: 2020 TAS, TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767-2451 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 343 CORONADO OR of Tan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 1 /1,991 7,473/2,020 960,000 (M) I 1945: Book 021 Pgs 079- 8 /1,983 5,57612,146 780,000 (M) I 0000: Book pas - 0 /0 0} 0 0 ( ) 0000: Book Pas - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS ,Ju3t/Market: 450,000 Homestead: NO ?wnership % .000 Govt Exem; NO Use %: .000 Asaeased/Cap; 450,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 450,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 10,336.23 1) 68 x 1i0 60.00 7,480.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 10, 336.23 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 10, 336. 23 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB NO. 2 BLK A, LOT 11 & S 11.__7__7,3_ Description FT OF LOT 10 It n f7 rT ;t Ir p 1 2035 PLANNING 4F0`V .1 t)t 1' Svc; http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-giVp=08+29+15+17586+001+0110&o=1 7/6/2005 08 / 29 / 15 / GINAL Page Iof1 17550 1 001 / 0110 :01 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 12:04:22 Commercial Card 0i of i Improvement Type: Hotel/Hotel 4 4 St Property Address: 343 COROHADO DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 S-truc?ural E1?m?n?s Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Hone Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 11 Heating & Air Hone Fixtures 33 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,953 Effective Age 30 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar+E;?s Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,988 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 450 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 92 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) . 00 0 5) .00 0 11) 00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Cc)mm4-- rcial ExTra FE3aTurE3s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 4000 1.50 4,000 6,000 6,000 999 2) PATIOIDECK 22X16 8.50 352 21990 1,200 1,970 3) SHUFBDCT 6X56 i,000.00 1 1,000 1,000 999 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 81200 r1(i iL 19 NO- PLANNING & DEVEI0: 'r.,CN1 SVCS -- .. QTY OF http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gifl?p=08+29+15+17586+001+0110+01&o=1&t=3 7/6/2005 I G I N Ai Page Iof I 08 / 29 / 15 / 17004 / 000 / 0070 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 12:06:18 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TAS, JERRY OBK: 07473 OPG: 2020 TAS, TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767-2451 EVAC; A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 342 HAMDEN DR of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract; 260.02 f 2002 - 2003 l rom : sa es 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information i /1,991 7,473/2,020 960,000 (M) I 1951 Book 027 Pgs 046- 8 /1,983 5,576/2,146 780,000 (M) I 0000; Book Pgs - 0 /1,968 2,880/ 624 80,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS ,Just/Market: 710,000 Homestead: YES Ownership % 1.000 SAUE-OUR-HOMES CAP Govt Exem: NO Use %: i20 Assessed/Cap: 703,600 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 678,600 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 15,587.03 1) 70 x i10 80.00 7,656.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes, 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 15, 734.04 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be ; 16, 308. 27 Short Legal COLUMBIA SUB NO. 3 LOT 7 & S 5FT OF LOT 6 Description f1j NO http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gif?p=08+29+15+17604+000+0070&o=1 7/6/2005 r 08 / 29 / 15 / 17604 / J61GINAL Page lof l 000 / 0070 :01 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 12:06:12 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 342 HAMDEN DR Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 S-trii c?iural E1emE3 Il.-tS Foundation Spread/Mono Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air None Fixtures 54 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,954 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3aS Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 3,320 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch . 30 1,094 8) . 00 0 3) Upper Stry Base Area .90 2,520 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 18) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 CommE3 rciaIL E:),cl-- ra Fc-- a-turE3 !n- Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 4000 1.50 4,000 6,000 6,000 999 2) POOL 450 SF 151000.00 1 15,000 6,000 1,970 3) PATIO/DECK 300SF 10.00 300 3,000 1,200 1,970 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 13,200 D G C PLANNING 6 ClEv =i .',t i?. VC$CRY Cc? _.? .. . :::'y i? t:u`4 t .S.. http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-gifl?p=08+29+15+17604+000+0070+01&o=1&t=3 7/6/2005 P LONG RANGE PLANNING DFVEI.OPMFNT REVIEW February 21, 2007 Mr. Jerry Tas Mrs. Teresa Tas C/o Mr. Ed Hooper P.O. Box 4268 Clearwater, Florida 33758 r C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos-r OFFICE; Box 4748, CLFARWATER, FLoRiDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICiis BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVrNUF, CLFARWATF.R, FLORIDA 33756 T?:I.FPHONI: (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2005-07066 - 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tas: On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcels at 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive shall be submitted by May 15, 2008, with all required certificates of occupancy being obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to reapply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via email at rbert.tefftCo)myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D MFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslHnmden 342 Gem Tower (7) - Approved - ApprovedlHamden 342 - Time Extension Development Order 02-21-07.doc FRAM: Ilus11,U D, MAYOR JofiN DoRAN, CoIINc:II.DI1:,N11WR I IMT I IANUTAON, COUNCILMh:AWR 1 ILL JoNSON, CUUNCILME:NI]W t ® CARI.P.N A. Pr rF.RSr:N, Cot Ncn.M >nsI•:R 'T'01 JAI, I:h4PLOYMEN nun Ar•r•uu,IA'HvF: AcrioN 1?MITOvl:R,. hem Tower 342 Hamden Drive Clearwater Beach, FL 33767 http://www.gemtower.com Ph: (727) 446-9397 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 Re: Community Development Board Request For Time Extension Gem Towers - FLD2005-07066 Mr. Delk Please accept this as our request to be placed on the February Community Development Board Agenda to request a 1-year extension to the above referenced development order. We understand that this is our second extension request and, as such, must be approved by the Community Development Board at its next meeting. The recent economic downturn coupled with rising construction costs have made it difficult to market our proposed condominiums. Lenders are now demanding pre-sales in excess of 66% of the units to be built in order to fund our project and we have not been able to meet the requirement with the current market conditions which are, unfortunately, out of our control. The recent road construction on Coronado Drive has also hampered our sales efforts, but we understand that work will be completed soon. We thank you for your assistance in this request and look forward to improving market conditions and getting our project underway. Sincerely f ? Cc; Joe Burdette Ed Hooper 0 • C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Possr OImICI: Box 4748, CLr ARWATER Fr.orm)A 33758-4748 w':v?17 R' ?ti? MUNICIPAL. SE,RVIC?S BUILDING, 100 Soui,ii MvlrrLr•. AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEILITHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 LONG RANG: PIANNING DEVGI.Of i ENT RIiVII?W August 2, 2006 Mr. Jerry Tas Mrs. Teresa Tas C/o Mr. Ed Hooper P.O. Box 4268 Clearwater, Florida 33758 Re: FLD2005-07066 - 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tas: On November 15, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above referenced Flexible Development application to permit 17 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building height from 35 feet to 78 feet (to mean roof) with an additional 14 feet for architectural embellishments (from mean roof), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive and to 71.64 feet along Hamden Drive as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit must be initiated within one year from the date of CDB approval (November 15, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On July 28, 2006, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to initiate a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited problems with construction pre-sales and financing, increased construction costs necessitating architectural redesigns of the interior, and a change in architects. Since the approval of this project, amendments have been made to the Community Development Code that have a significant effect on the project. Those amendments are as follows: ? The parking requirement for attached dwellings has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was approved with 26 parking spaces for 17 attached dwelling units, a rate of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit; ? The definition of "Height, building or structure" has been amended so that only elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures are permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum JriIIX D010N, Cure 11AI ;M]WI: I Ic,vr I hNI11:10N, 0)( 6CLAIDIMIt 13n.i. ?c,xu, , C(A .N(1011:\IIWJR PI:i FINSI.N, C)I uai.MFMIflT l?•?IPl i» \Ii N I AND Ai rn;NIA rn is AcI IoN Fmi'l.m i.r„ August 2, 2006 • Tas - Page 2 of 2 • height within the district. As approved, the project included appurtenances (architectural embellishments) not consistent with the above definition that project 14 feet above the roof deck. In considering the above changes to the Code, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension of the original Development Order to May 15, 2007, to initiate an application for a building permit to construct those improvements on your parcel of land at 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive as previously approved by the Community Development Board with same conditions of approval attached. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such an extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DeparlmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationsWamden 342 Gem Tower (7) - ApprovedWamden 342 -Time Extension Development Order 08-02-06.doc •, a Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 Re: Gem Towers Gem Towers - FLD2005-07066 Dear Mr. Delk Please accept this letter as our request for a 1-year extension for the above referenced Development Order for the Gem Towers on Clearwater Beach. This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the specific criteria for our request is as follows: 1. We are in the process of pre-sales and market conditions have been slow. Construction lenders' have increased the number of pre-sales required to fund construction loans and this has hampered us as well. 2. Increase in construction costs have forced us to redo some of our interior architectural drawings in order to keep our costs in line while still maintaining our commitment to a quality product. 3. We are also in the process of changing architects to a firm better suited for the production drawings and this as also caused us some delay. Should you require any additional information, please contact me and I will see that you receive whatever information you may require. Thank you for your help in this matter. Jerry Tas Teresa Tas Property Owner Cc: Keith Zayac ,CEYE D JUL 2 8 2006 ? PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW November 16, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 Re: FLD2005-07066 - 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On November 15, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development approval to permit 17 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building height from 35 feet to 78 feet (to mean roof) with an additional 14 feet for architectural embellishments (from mean roof), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive and to 71.64 feet along Hamden Drive as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and subject to the attached conditions of approval: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.35 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Small Motel" District; 3. That the subject property was conditionally approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) at its meeting of September 20, 2005, for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for 27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 17 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would have otherwise been permitted by Code; 4. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with overnight accommodations and nonresidential uses to the west along South Gulfview Boulevard and attached dwellings to the east along Brightwater Drive; 5. That the proposed building measures 78 feet in height (to mean roof); 6. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property; 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the "Small Motel" District of Beach by Design; 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines and color palette of Beach by Design and further that those colors consist of. dark beige (SW2018), pale yellow-green (SW2353), pale yellow-green (SW2354), pale green (SW2367), pale blue (SW2410), and light tan (SW2445); 9. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3-913.A; and BRIAN T. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCII\tEMBER BILL )ONSON, COUNCILMENIBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COLINCILMEMBER "EQUAL En1PLOYiMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION En4PLOYER" • • -t 10. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of Section 2-803.C. Conditions of Approval: 1. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 9. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 15, 2006); 10. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 11. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 12. That measures to enhance the sight visibility of these parking spaces are accommodated prior to the issuance of any building permits; 13. That prior to the issuance any building permits the means by which seepage and accumulated water will be evacuated from the sublevel must be identified and deemed acceptable by the City's Engineering Department; and 14. That the development proposal is revised to provide adequate accommodations for recycling containers prior to the issuance of any building permits. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by November 15, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by • # this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on November 23, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael elk, CP Planning Director S. (Planning Departmentl C D BIFLEX (FLD)Unactive or Finished ApplicationslHamden Drive 342 -Gem Tower (7) - ApprovedlHamden Drive 342 - Development Order.doc RESPONSES TO 342 HAMDEN DRC COMMENTS General Engineering: 1. Coordinate sanitary tie in with utility modifications proposed for Beach Walk. The existing utilities shown are taken from the Beach Walk plans and superimposed as existing. The sanitary connection is the closest apparent location available. 2. FDC shall not be located in public ROW. FDC has been located outside of ROW Fire: 1. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged 2. This building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge with intent of comply prior to CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 3. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge with intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 4. Fire Department Connections shall be indentified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 5. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, tested and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 6. Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply.Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Per discussion at DRC, a MEP consultant will provide calculations prior to construction plan approval. 7. Provide Class I standpipe system per NFPA-1,13.2.2.2. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan.. Stormwater: Required Volume of pond must follow City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Criteria where Vol = delta C x A x i x 3600; Additionally, the existing impervious area is limited to a 50% credit in the predevelopment C calculations (use a value of.49 rather than .98). 0 • The calculations have been revised as requested. Please note that the calculations incorporated half of the existing impervious area, but has been revised to show the full existing impervious area at C=.49. 2. Where is the second pond mentioned in the narrative? Narrative appears to be simply a copy of another site which is also submitted for review at this time. The revised plan calls now for three ponds. 3. 6" freeboard is required on ponds. Additional volume has been added by the addition of a third pond to provide additional freeboard. 4. Include more proposed grades for sidewalk adjacent to pond. Additional grades have been added to the sidewalk. 5. Provide cross section of pond, banks of ponds may only be 4:1 (H:V). Up to 2 sides (50010) of pond may be vertical walls. A third pond has been added to reduce the vertical walls to a maximum of two sides and 4:1 slopes. Additional cross sections will be added to the construction plans. 6. Demonstrate Pond recovery within 24 hours. Pond recovery will be added to the calculations during construction plan preparation when a geotechnical report is prepared. Solid Waste: Dumpster staging area needs to be shown on drawing, Please show were Recycling Carts will be placed for residents. The dumpster and recycling are to be located in the trash room as shown. Traffic Engineering: 1. Vertical height clearance of parking garage must be 8'2" to accommodate a H/C van per Florida Building Code 2004 Section 406.2.2. It is acknowledged that the parking garage clearance must be 8'-2" minimum. 2. H/C parking spaces must be close to an accessible entrance. The HIC parking spaces have been moved closer to the building entrances. 3. How does gate operate? The gate will operate from a push button and garage door opener for residents and call. pad to individual units for guests. 4. How does car lift operate? The car lift will operate similar to an elevator where the operator will drive the car into the lift and press a button to close the gate and move the lift to the second floor. 5. Sight visibility for parked motorists must not be obstructed especially near car lift. The car lift has been moved to the back of the garage so cars can stack safely in the garage rather than in the ROW and eliminate sight visibility issues for the lift. 6. Driveway on Hamden Drive and Brightwater Drive do not meet minimum driveway spacing of 125'. Relocate driveway to Brightwater Drive to midblock. Per DRC discussion, the driveway has been left in the current location but the car lift has been relocated to the back of the garage. 7. Applicant is limited to one access per City's Community Development Code Section 3-1402 B. Eliminate driveway to Hamden Drive. Per DRC discussion, the Hamden driveway has been left in place rather than having two driveways on Brightwater Drive. 8. Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. i.e. parking space and walls. A variance has been included in requests for parking garage wall locations within sight triangles, however there are no other objects that exceeds 30". 9. Gate must be spaced 20' from face of gate to back edge of sidewalk. The gates have been relocated more than 20' from the face of gate to back edge of sidewalk. 10. Provide parking layout for upper floors? The parking layouts have been included in architectural plans. Planning: 1. Pursuant to Section I of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the building elevation drawings shall include colors and materials for all sides of the building. The buiding colors and materials are shown in the architectural plans. 2. Provide a south elevation drawing. A south elevation has been added to the architectural elevations. 3. Provide details as to the architectural features of the building. A higher quality elevation drawing will need to be provided prior to the application being heard by the CDB. A higher quality elevation has been added to the plans. 4. The site data table denotes a building height of 82'-4" to mean roof, however the elevations dimension the same height to the roof deck. Height is to be measured to mean roof. Revise the elevations accordingly. The building incorporates a barrel tile mechanical "high top cover" to hide proposed mechanical equipment on top of the roof slab. The civil plans have been changed to show the height to the roof deck. 5. The site plan identifies a car lift. Clarify how this is to function (its imact on the ground level accessibility) and where vehicles are being lifted to. The only other floor plan provided depicts a dwelling unit above the lift. The car lift will function much like an elevator with a manual button to close the lift gate and raise it to the second floor. The lift has been relocated to the back of the garage to provide additional stacking. The second floor plan has been added to the architectural plans showing the additional parking spaces. 6. The site plan and site data table denote 30 parking spaces being provided; however only 20 parking spaces are depicted. Please clarify. The second floor elevation has been added showing the second floor parking. 7. How is mail proposed to be handled? It is anticipated that the mail will be dropped off at the front desk and distributed to individual mail boxes. 8. Provide a door for the east lobby (ground level) into the garage. The door has been added. 9. Provide the dimensions from the gates to the edge of pavement. Also, identify the means by which guests obtain access to the garage. The dimensions from the gate to the back of sidewalk have been added. The guests will have access to the spaces in front of the gate along Brightwater Drive. 10. The site data table denotes a front (north) setback of 2.36to pavement; however the actual setback is 0'- see paved area surrounding the fountain. The fountain area has been removed and setbacks revised. 11. The site data table denotes a side (south) setback of 0.34' to pavement. This is actually a side setback and the actual setback is 0' - see walkway at the southeast corner. The setback has been revised to a rear south setback with a new setback of 0.33 ft without sidewalk. 12. Identify the location of the refuse staging area. The trash room is labeled on civil and architectural plans. 13. How is recycling proposed to be handled? The recycling will be in the trash room. 14. Are any amenities proposed with the development? If so, provide drawings that depict there locations. Due to the size of the project, the amenities are limited to a pool and gazebo/trellis. 15. Provide a roof plan. A roof plan has been added. 16. Where is the mechancial equipment associated with the development proposed to be located? How is the mechanical equipment proposed to be screened? The mechanical equipment is located on the roof slab and covered with a "high hat" mechanical cover to completely screen the equipment. 17. If a swimming pool is to be provided, identify the depth of the pool and provide a section drawing of the building. The pool is Y-6" deep to fit with associated mechanical equipment within the 10 ft story height. 18. Provide floor plans for each level. The floor plans shall be complete with regard to the location of all windows, doors, balconies and any other architectural features being proposed. Revised floor plans are included. 19. Revise the general notes with regard to the "present use" and the site data table with regard to "overnight accommodations" - the plans state that 29 units presently exist; however according to the City's records only 27 units exist. This will not affect the requested density. Revised to 27 units. 20. Provide a revised Description of Requests (Attachment "B") as per the following: (a) State the correct front (north) and rear (south) setbacks requested (as previously discussed); (b) State the correct lot width requested - the width of the property along Hamden Drive is 71 feet, not 50 feet as requested; and (c) Please note that the requested increase to height may also need to be modified based upon revisions to the architectural elevations as previously discussed. Attachment B is revised. 21. With regard to General Applicability criterion #1, provide a revised response that states how the development proposal is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the adjacent properties. The submitted response does not address this. Attachment C is revised. 22. Provide a revised response to General Applicability Criterion #6, which addresses how the design of the development proposal minimizes adverse visual impacts. Attachment C is revised. 23. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion # 1, provide information as to how the development proposal is impractical without the requested deviation to height. Attachment D is revised. 24. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #7, provide a rationale as to how the proposed increase to height will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Attachment D is revised. 25. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #8, clarify how the community character is benefitted by a building 82 feet in height. Also, as the development proposal requires reductions to the setbacks on the north, south, east and west sides of the property, clarify how the community character is benefitted by these reductions. Attachment D is revised. 26. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #10, Staff does not concur with the notion that a 82'-4" building is consistent with "mid-rise" development.... therefore, Staff will not support the request for an increase to building height as the development proposal is inconsistent with the "Small Motel" District of Beach by Design. Acknowledged. 9:10 am Case Number: FLD2005-0 -6 -- 342 HAMDEN DR 49 Owner(s): Jerry Tas 342 Hamden Dr Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: The 0.35 acre property is located on the south side of Brightwater Drive between Coronado and Hamden Drives. Atlas Page: 276A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District, an increase to height from 35 feet to 83 feet, a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 0 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to 5 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to 0 feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive and to 71.64 feet along Hamden Drive as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Rick Albee, Robert Tefft Applicant Representative: Keith Zayac The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1. Coordinate sanitary tie in with utility modifications proposed for Beach Walk. 2. FDC shall not be located in public ROW. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Prior to building permit: 1. A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220 at the Municipal Services Building. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Fire: No Issues Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 5 ***PLEASE N . L*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE A u, HORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. This building is determined to meet the criteria of a High Rise Building as defined by both the Florida Building Code, 2001 Edition and the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2004 Edition, the requirements of a High Rise structure must be met. These requirements include, but are not limited to Building Code and Fire Code items such as: Fire Pump and generator if pump is electric, sprinkler system throughout with control valve and water flow device on each floor, Class I Standpipe System, Fire Alarm using voice/alarm communication, Central Control Station, firefighter phone system, Emergency lighting, and Standby Power as per NFPA 70, Pressurized Stairwells, Stairwell marking and Elevator Lobbies. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 3. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Fire Department Connections shall be indentified by a sign that states "No Paarking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of applicance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . This property must be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-1. Please acknowledge inten to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: Legal: No Issues No Issues Land Resources: 1 . No Issues. Landscaping: 1 No Issues Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . 1. Required Volume of pond must follow City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Criteria where Vol = delta C x A x i x 3600; Additionally, the existing impervious area is limited to a 50% credit in the predevelopment C calculations (use a value of .49 rather than .98). 2. Where is the second pond mentioned in the narrative? Narrative appears to be simply a copy of another site which is also submitted for review at this time. 3. 6" freeboard is required on ponds 4. Include more proposed grades for sidewalk adjacent to pond. 5. Provide cross section of pond, banks of ponds may only be 4:1 (H:V). Up to 2 sides (50%) of pond may be vertical walls. 6. Demonstrate Pond recovery within 24 hours. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Solid Waste: 1 . Dumpster staging area needs to be shown on drawing, Please show were Recycling Carts will be placed for residents Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 6 Vertical height Sance of parking garage must be 8' 2" to accoirOdate a H/C van per Florida Building Code 2004 Section 406.2.2. 2. H/C parking spaces must be close to an accessible entrance. 3. How does gate operate? 4. How does car lift operate? 5. Sight visibility for parked motorists must not be obstructed especially near car lift. 6. Driveway on Hamden Drive and Brightwater Drive do not meet minimum driveway spacing of 125'. Relocate driveway to Brightwater Drive to midblock. 7. Applicant is limited to one access per City's Community Development Code Section 3-1402 B. Eliminate driveway to Hamden Drive. 8. Objects within the sight distance triangles must not exceed 30" in height from the pavement. i.e. parking space and walls. 9. Gate must be spaced 20' from face of gate to back edge of sidewalk. 10. Provide parking layout for upper floors? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 7 I . Pursuant to Sectio - of the Flexible Development Application for dOmprehensive Infill Project, the building elevation drawings shall include colors and materials for all sides of the building. 2. Provide a south elevation drawing. 3 . Provide details as to the architectural features of the building. A higher quality elevation drawing will need to be provided prior to the application being heard by the CDB. 4. The site data table denotes a building height of 82'-4" to mean roof, however the elevations dimension the same height to the roof deck. Height is to be measured to mean roof. Revise the elevations accordingly. 5. The site plan identifies a car lift. Clarify how this is to function (its imact on the ground level accessibility) and where vehicles are being lifted to. The only other floor plan provided depicts a dwelling unit above the lift. 6. The site plan and site data table denote 30 parking spaces being provided; however only 20 parking spaces are depicted. Please clarify. 7. How is mail proposed to be handled? 8 . Provide a door for the east lobby (ground level) into the garage. 9. Provide the dimensions from the gates to the edge of pavement. Also, identify the means by which guests obtain access to the garage. 10. The site data table denotes a front (north) setback of 2.36' to pavement; however the actual setback is 0' - see paved area surrounding the fountain. 11 . The site data table denotes a side (south) setback of 0.34' to pavement. This is actually a side setback and the actual setback is 0' - see walkway at the southeast corner. 12 . Identify the location of the refuse staging area. 13. How is recycling proposed to be handled? 14. Are any amenities proposed with the development? If so, provide drawings that depict there locations. 15. Provide a roof plan. 16. Where is the mechancial equipment associated with the development proposed to be located? How is the mechanical equipment proposed to be screened? 17. If a swimming pool is to be provided, identify the depth of the pool and provide a section drawing of the building. 18. Provide floor plans for each level. The floor plans shall be complete with regard to the location of all windows, doors, balconies and any other architectural features being proposed. 19. Revise the general notes with regard to the "present use" and the site data table with regard to "overnight accommodations" - the plans state that 29 units presently exist; however according to the City's records only 27 units exist. This will not affect the requested density. 20. Provide a revised Description of Requests (Attachment "B") as per the following: (a) State the correct front (north) and rear (south) setbacks requested (as previously discussed); (b) State the correct lot width requested - the width of the property along Hamden Drive is 71 feet, not 50 feet as requested; and (c) Please note that the requested increase to height may also need to be modified based upon revisions to the architectural elevations as previously discussed. 21 . With regard to General Applicability criterion #1, provide a revised response that states how the development proposal is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the adjacent properties. The submitted response does not address this. 22. Provide a revised response to General Applicability Criterion #6, which addresses how the design of the development proposal minimizes adverse visual impacts. 23 . With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #1, provide information as to how the development proposal is impractical without the requested deviation to height. 24. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #7, provide a rationale as to how the proposed increase to height will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 25. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #8, clarify how the community character is benefitted by a building 82 feet in height. Also, as the development proposal requires reductions to the setbacks on the north, south, east and west sides of the property, clarify how the community character is benefitted by these reductions. 26 With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #10, Staff does not concur with the notion that a 82'-4" building is consistent with "mid-rise" development.. therefore, Staff will not support the request for an increase to building height as the developmen roposal is inconsistent with the "Small Motel" District of Beach by Design. 2 Tn'? o Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 8 T? 27 . All conditions are * e addressed prior to the development proposaaqroceeding before the Community Development Board (CDB). Other: No Comments Notes: To be placed on the 09/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all above departments' comments by Noon, 08/11/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate. Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 9 0 CITY OF CLEIRWATER Q Cle'aMater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM July 13, 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, 17134695 RE: FLD2005-07066 -- 342 HAMDEN DR -- Letter of Completeness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07066. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 06, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4539 or Robert.Tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert Tefft Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07066 - 342 HAMDENDR . 1 420-05 Client Keith Zavac & Associates 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax ORIGI keithO-keithzayac.com N A a ..w__ . _. July 11, 2005 Mr. Robert Tefft City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 RE: FLD2005-07066--342 Hamden Drive--Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Tefft. 8 E' 1.) Pursuant to Section E of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, a stormwater narrative must be submitted with all applications. A Stormwater narrative has been added to the stormwater calculations. 2.) Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, a tree survey is required to be submitted. Please refer to the Survey attached to the resubmiftal package for all existing trees contained on site. Also, on Sheet 2 of the Demolition Plan existing trees are called out to be removed. 3.) Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the landscape plan shall delineate and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers. On Sheet 5 of the landscape plan all required landscape buffers and curbing have been dimensioned 4.) Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the landscape plan shall delineate and dimension all parking areas including landscaping islands and curving. On Sheet 5 of the landscape plan all required landscape buffers and curbing have been dimensioned. 5.) Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, an application for the Comprehensive Landscape Program is required to be submitted. 1?. I, I i ,:iCE. M V 1. 420-05 Client This comment does not apply to the subject project; per our telephone conversation. 6.) Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the building elevation drawings shall include colors and materials for all sides of the building. The architectural package has been augmented with color labels and materials for all sides of the building. Sincere , ! Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RaA. j! li g 2M5 Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. PLAN CATCH ar7 SAX ORIGINAL 2 a Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Gem Tower Stormwater Narrative • 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com The stormwater system is designed to treat the first half-inch of runoff from the site, and attenuate the 25 year 1 hour storm event. The system consists of two normally dry pond connected by PVC pipe. The site runoff is directed to the ponds by sheet flow and underground piping. The peak discharge is attenuated by a control structure prior to discharge to the public right of way. D JUL 11200 rLANI vta rx Ut (; r CITY 1w C.: _ ..._ . ??i ORIGINAL . a M ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Increase in height from 35 ft to 82'-4" from FEMA to midpoint of roof. • Decrease in front (east) pavement setback from 15 ft to 5.0 ft. • Decrease in front (north) pavement setback from 15 ft to 2.36 ft. • Decrease in side (south) pavement setback from 10 ft to 0.00 ft. • Reduction in lot width from 100 ft to 50 ft. • Termination of non-conformance for 29 overnight accommodations and conversion to 20 multi-family condominium units. Q l?? U U It 2005 ORIGINAL W LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 6, 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 RE: FLD2005-07066 -- 342 Hamden Drive -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-07066. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. Pursuant to Section E of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, a stormwater narrative must be submitted with all applications. 2. Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, a tree survey is required to be submitted. 3. Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the landscape plan shall delineate and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers. 4. Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the landscape plan shall delineate and dimension all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing. 5. Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, an application for the Comprehensive Landscape Program is required to be submitted. 6. Pursuant to Section I of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the building elevation drawings shall include colors and materials for all sides of the building. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, Monday, July 11, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or at robert.tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert G. Tefft Planner III BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR How HAMILTON, COUNCII2,1EMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMENIBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMENIBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Jul. 06 2005 01:33PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Jul.06 01:32PM 01'27 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-FOP-FAX C435-7329). w CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 A Clearwater FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: July 6, 2005 To: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc., (727-793-9855) From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: 621 Bay Esplanade / FLD2005-07066 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: "Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.tefftac myclearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** b- F LA ZC)CXS • . 67 B, slit CITY OF CLEARWATER ID • , AND Ytc[NITY - - (?® PDR' W COUNTY ILOBIDA 2 •? 32/02 32/03 Q ? a PREPARED BY y 9 F"T Po4 "2 to PUBllC WORKS ADIIINISTP-11,01, 4 STREETS a y WATER LOT A 100 S Yyy?14 Nt., ClaoraaM. 837795 11n: ftu)se:-47yq roc fma)sz9-nss n e° 47-z4"\ 1p//aaa.aaa?a,e-ncan1Nphrar/ 5 w 1 "1 52 99 1 9 Olatal w.. o pa 9 C l l r O t N{ 0 Puatk information data is N 1 p? ,``.\JJ 7 p.5 Ttr.ata B to of 53 99 ft 54 100 arQ 2N 7 S p g 9 en 5 02 - pa ram-aoT 10 101 tar 4 M 3w $ # 32 6 53 e 11 l0 5 12 S 101 0 1 oat 'Im 2 rp elf 51 49 So oar EE STRT i ?No 105 r 1 ? eap at 13 oo' p 11 SO a IA ur III 09 ne 3 I to I tN eg 62 1 0 4m M M a O2 Ra 17 ft 5 pA P Te% It Fl? 17. . roar. l za a 29 „4 ]0 IPo -r qt 32 3134 3/ 35 i tau 70 11941 b ? 14t 71 1211 I n11. S F"N tAV T-, _"*Q, 440 WEST .? COKM ? 22-27 ,C `IOA IA 177 1 1 2 3 5? 0 S ,e4 2 a 5/ 7/ --T; -;in mad by lM City Of 17hw"Ief Punk Wor14 AdmMltlrallm/EnpMaorM¢ pin moat as aecaptad and uaed .Y IM rtebknt tNh IM uMmalaMMp thdt the dolor raaMreO vot rdkelad tar IM pwpov of tlardopIng a Qrophk In0a11rv Wf. 1-tay. At loch, IM City of ATe -I PWA/E mocaa nor grantMl, aapfaasad or hnpllad, -p. C IM aacorocy. comaalmasa. rdloGlplY• a w11aaANY o( This data for any olhor parlkv uN. ralhnmora. IM city of clnn-l,r f7 15 19 I20 1 2 23 2A 25 27 /25 PWAA aalamea na nobility tho11o1wr o-dat d tilt, IM uaa a mifra? of tum data, C` d4 29 ? This ARaa wqa b r OFM to p,rladk d-9.a. ra MI.-Il n aoaul wt d rMdana pm- cal PWAIT a (({{ Q t R gee 30 visit oor W. dlr. jig, 12 40 79 38 I37 33 JA 331 32 31 N 7 P 4 100 200 440 840 oaw 32 13 11 15 to 111-1 IT P 10 1118 I2 13 14 to A /b 9 : 3 BAYWOE £ Y 8 i $ B 14 17 0 If 12 13 14 15 32 A 12 P LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER 1234 LOT ADDRESS CITY LIMITS LINE M::^!E SHADED AREA - PROPERTY t' 3 OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ' ZONE LINE F C ZONING ATLAS f SW 1/4 Of SECTION ?) -7 c A FLD2005-07066, (53) A M P BELLINO INC 12016 WADSWORTH DR TAMPA FL 33626 - BELLE AQUA VILLAS LLC PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189 BOLDOG, DOROTHY BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE M & J TRUST PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 CANNEY, SCOTT W 314 WESTERN AVE ALLEGAN M149010 - 1241 Clearwater Beach Association Jay Keyes 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 AMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD PTR 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 BOLDOG, CLARA BOLDOG, DOROTHY 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 BRIGHTWATER COVE LLC 701 SPOTTIS WOODE LN CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5267 CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Doug Williams, President 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 CZAICKI, EDWARD D'AMICO, LOUIS J CZAICKI, BOZENA 410 HAMDEN DR 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 GIADLA, WERONIKA GIADLA, ALOJZY 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 GIBSON, EMMETT GIBSON, EVELYN L 2309 BRISTOL ST BRYAN TX 77802 - HIGHLANDER ROCK INC 415 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 KALLAS, DORA KALLAS, GEORGE 3405 GULF BLVD BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 J M B & A DEVELOPERS LLC 1947 PETERS PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 BAY LAWN ' r 406 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE 6033 CRIMSON CT MCLEAN VA 22101 - 1818 BUKOWSKI, WLADYSLAW BUKOWSKI, KRYSTYNA 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450 CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER SEASHELL RESORT 28059 US HIGHWAY 19 N STE 100 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 2620 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GIOVANNI, ROBERT KOZIK, CHRISTIAN 852 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1131 JZMCCORP 415 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 L O M INC 4100 N 28TH TERR HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 LITTLE, DAVID R LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC MALKE, ROBERT E 1734 CASEY JONES CT 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 MALKE, TERESA L CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - PO BOX 2124 LARGO FL 33779 - 2124 MARKS, I RW IN J MARKS, DAWN D 115 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 SAUNDERS, WILLIAM SAUNDERS, SHIRLEY 333 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2449 SIMON, RICHARD A 1474 S PAIRIE AVE #D CHICAGO IL 60608 - 2208 TAS, JERRY TAS, TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 US-EURO-TRADE INC 346 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 WILK, THOMAS J WILK, STASIA 451 HARBOR DR S INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 3118 • - . MAZZON, MAURIZIO 110 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - R T V PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 3835 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 SEACOVE PTNSHP 316 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 SUN WEST PALMS DEV LLC 409 HAMDEN DR S CLEARWATER FL 33767 - TIDSWELL INC 419 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 VASILAROS, SOPHIA 111 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 0 PALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN INC 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 ROGERS,ROLAND 321 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SHAH, JUGALKISHOR B SHAH, MANNA J 326 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2448 SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ KUNOWSKA, EWA 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WAZIO, EUGENIUSZ F WAZIO, IRENA 110 BRIG HTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 0 0 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. Meeting Date: Location: ? Current Use: E' ? Active Code Enforcement Case no yes: ? Address number es (no) (vacant land) ? Landscaping es) (no) ? Overgrown (yes) no ? Debris (yes). (DO ? Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) no ? Building(s) (good) (?ri (poor) (vacant land) ? Fencing (none) oo (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint (good) ai (poor) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes) o ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) &g ? Signage 20) (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) (tri e) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ? Dumpster (enclosed) enc d) ? Outdoor storage (yes) (&o Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date: 7 2GS Reviewed by: n c Telephone: Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 0 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Robert G. Tefft Planner III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-07066 - 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive DATE: January 26, 2007 Attached is information related to the request by Ed Hooper, on behalf of Jerry and Teresa Tas, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on May 15, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: ? The parking requirement for attached dwellings has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was approved with 26 parking spaces for 17 attached dwelling units, a rate of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit; ? The definition of "Height, building or structure" has been amended so that only elevator equipment rooms alid like mechanical equipment enclosures are permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height within the district. As approved, the project included appurtenances (architectural embellishments) not consistent with the above definition that project 14 feet above the roof deck. Attachments: Letter of Request, Time Extension Development Order (August 2, 2006), and Maps and Photos S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Wnactive or Finished ApplicationsWamden 342 Gem Tower (T) - ApprovedWamden 342 - Time Extension Memorandum 02-20-07.doc Page 1 of 1 n U CDB Meeting Date: November 15, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-07066 Agenda Item: D. 1. Owner / Applicant: Jerry and Teresa Tas Agent: Keith E. Zayac Addresses: 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: 0 REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 17 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building height from 35 feet to 78 feet (to mean roof) with an additional 14 feet for architectural embellishments (from mean roof), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive and to 71.64 feet along Hamden Drive as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C EXISTING ZONING / Tourist (T) District. LAND USE: Resort Facility High (RFH) Category. PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodations (27 units). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (17 units). ADJACENT ZONING / North: Tourist (T) District - Overnight Accommodations. LAND USE: South: Tourist (T) District - Overnight Accommodations. East: Tourist (T) District - Overnight Accommodations; and Preservation (P) District - Clearwater Harbor. West: Tourist (T) District - Overnight Accommodations / Retail. CHARACTER OF THE The surrounding area predominantly consists of overnight IMMEDIATE VICINITY: accommodation uses with nonresidential uses to the west along South Gulfview Boulevard and attached dwellings to the east along Brightwater Drive. UPDATE: At its meeting of September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board approved a Termination of Status of Nonconformity (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 17 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) associated with a Flexible Development request for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project. The balance of the development proposal was continued until the Board's meeting of November 15, 2005, with direction given to the applicant to redesign the project to meet setbacks (with regard to the building and parking) and to reduce the number of dwelling units (to the proposed 17). The applicant has submitted revised drawings addressing the above issues and the application is now before the Board for approval. Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 1 of 7 • ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.35-acre subject property, which is located along the south side of Brightwater Drive between Coronado and Hamden Drives, has a zoning designation of Tourist (T) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Resort Facilities High (RFH). The property is also located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Small Motel" District. According to the City's records, the subject property presently consists of two separate buildings, which function as a single development. The property at 342 Hamden Drive consists of a two-story building with an accessory swimming pool and river rock deck, while the property at 343 Coronado Drive consists of a one-story building with an accessory wood deck and shuffleboard court. The development also consists of back out parking in the Brightwater Drive, Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive rights-of-way. The immediate vicinity is predominantly comprised of overnight accommodation uses with nonresidential uses to the west along South Gulfview Boulevard and attached dwellings to the east along Brightwater Drive. Development Proposal: The development proposal consists of the demolition of the existing improvements on the subject properties and the construction of a 78-foot high building (to mean roof) containing 17 condominium units that range in size from a 1,650 square foot two-bedroom unit to a 2,260 square foot two-bedroom unit with den. The existing back out parking within the Brightwater Drive and Hamden Drive rights-of-way will be removed and replaced with sod and a five-foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the property line, while the back out parking within the Coronado Drive right-of-way will be removed and replaced with sod and on- street parking. It is noted that no sidewalk presently exists adjacent to the subject property. The development proposal also includes the provision of a roof top swimming pool and pavilion. Lot Width: Pursuant to Section 2-803, the minimum required lot width for attached dwellings is between 50 feet and 100 feet. The subject property is approximately 67.5 feet in width along Coronado Drive, 71.64 feet in width along Hamden Drive, and 220 feet in width along Brightwater Drive. It is noted that the adjacent properties to the south, which account for the balance of the block, are associated with the approved development for 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (Lucca Development). Therefore, there is no opportunity for consolidation of the properties; thus the reduction to lot widths, as requested, can be supported. Building Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwellings are required to provide a front setback of 0-15 feet, aside setback of 0-10 feet, and a rear setback of 10-20 feet. The subject property consists of three front setbacks (north, east and west) and one side setback (south). The development proposal has provided a 15-foot setback to the building from all property lines; however a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) is required. The requested reduction to the front (north) setback is to accommodate walkways to the building and the refuse staging area, which can be supported. It is noted that the development proposal currently before the Board has been modified to locate the majority of the proposed parking below grade. Thus, there is no longer a need for a setback reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), as was previously a part of this development proposal. As such, the revised development proposal is consistent with the direction set forth by the Board. Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 2 of 7 • • Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwelling units require the provision of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Therefore, the proposed 17 attached dwelling units require a total of 26 parking spaces. The development proposal provides 20 parking spaces on the sublevel parking area and six parking spaces on the ground level, for a total of 26 parking spaces; thus the project complies with the requirements of code with regard to the provision of off-street parking. It is noted that parking spaces #1 and #20 on the sublevel have limited visibility to the drive aisle. It is attached as a condition of approval that measures to enhance the sight visibility of these parking spaces are accommodated prior to the issuance of any building permits. It is further noted that the proposed elevation of the sublevel (40) is below the seasonal high water table (+2.75); therefore it is attached as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of any building permits the means by which seepage and accumulated water will be evacuated from the sublevel must be identified and deemed acceptable by the City's Engineering Department. Building Height: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District have a standard maximum height of 35 feet with a maximum permissible height of 100 feet, based upon compliance with the performance standards set forth in Section 2-803.13.3. The height of the proposed building measures 78 feet (to mean roof) with an additional 14 feet for architectural embellishments. It is noted that while the proposed building measures 78 feet in height, a reduction of five feet from what was previously proposed, this constitutes only one-half of the building. The balance of the building measures approximately 53 feet in height. As such, the proposed height of the building is now more proportionate to its width than what was previously proposed. The increase in height from 35 feet to 78 feet is consistent with the requirements of Section 2-803, and the requested additional 14 feet for architectural embellishments can be supported, as these elements are minimal in number and size, and will result in a varied roofline and improved building aesthetics. Solid Waste: The development proposal includes the provision of a "trash room" along the north side of the building as well as a 10-foot by 10-foot dumpster and recycling staging area within the front setback area along Brightwater Drive. While the proposed staging area accommodates space for recycling containers, it appears that the "trash room" does not have sufficient space to accommodate any recycling containers. It is attached as a condition of approval that the development proposal is revised to provide adequate accommodations for recycling containers prior to the issuance of any building permits. Beach by Design: In 1997 and 1998, a Plan was prepared for the City entitled "Clearwater Beach: Strategies for Revitalization. " This Plan was prepared after an extensive public process, directive surveys and input from the City Council and City administration. The purpose of Beach by Design, which was adopted by the City Council in 2001, is to implement the recommendations of that Plan and regulate development within certain areas of the beach. The subject property is located within the "Small Motel" District of the Beach by Design special area redevelopment plan and is defined as an area of small motels with established clientele and limited on- site amenities and off-street parking. It is noted that Beach by Design does not specifically put forth guidelines for the redevelopment of property within that portion of the "Small Motel" District between Coronado and Hamden Drives, but does contemplate that existing improvements will be sustained over time. It is noted that at its meeting of July 19, 2005, the CDB approved a development proposal on the abutting property to the south which included the construction of a 64-foot high building on said property. As discussed previously with regard to building height, one-half of the subject development proposal measures 78 feet in height (to mean roof), while the balance measures approximately 53 feet in height. Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 3 of 7 Based upon the above, the average height of the building is roughly 65 feet, which will be consistent with the emerging development pattern for this portion of the "Small Motel" District. Design Guidelines: The development proposal has been found to be consistent with the intent and purpose of the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design with regard to density, height, scale/mass, setbacks, and parking areas. Further, the proposed color palette for the development, which consists of dark beige (SW2018), pale yellow-green (SW2353), pale yellow-green (SW2354), pale green (SW2367), pale blue (SW2410), and light tan (SW2445), has been found to be consistent with the recommended color palette set forth in the Design Guidelines of Beach by Design. Based upon the above, positive findings can be made with regard to the development proposals compliance with the Beach by Design special area redevelopment plan. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria (Section 2-803.C): The following table depicts the development proposals inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria pursuant to Section 2-803.C: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and X development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting X properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel X proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the X immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street X parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist (T) District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 4 of 7 General Applicability Standards (Section 3-913.A): The following table depicts the development proposals inconsistencies with the General Applicability Standards pursuant to Section 3-913.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. X 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. X 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent X Compliance with Standards and Criteria (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-801.1 and 2- 803.3: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 30 dwelling units per 17 dwelling units X* acre (10 dwelling units) Impervious 0.95 0.56 X Surface Ratio Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 s q. ft. 15,269 square feet (0.35 acres) X Lot Width 50 - 100 feet 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive; X** 71.64 feet along Hamden Drive; and 220 feet along Brightwater Drive Height 35 - 100 feet 78 feet (to mean roof) X*** Parking Spaces 1.5 spaces per unit 26 spaces (1.5 spaces per unit) X (26 spaces) Front Setback 0-15 feet North: 15 feet (to building) X**** 0 feet (to pavement) East: 15 feet to building) X West: 15 feet (to building) X Side Setback 0-10 feet South: 10 feet (to building) X * Previously approved through Termination of Status of Nonconformity at the CDB meeting of 09-20-05. ** See above discussion with regard to Lot Width. *** See above discussion with regard to Building Height. **** See above discussion with regard to Setbacks. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with this site. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit 17 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building height from 35 feet to 78 feet (to mean roof) with an additional 14 feet for architectural embellishments (from mean roof), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive and to 71.64 feet along Hamden Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 5 of 7 • • Drive as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., based upon the following recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and conditions of approval: Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.35 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Small Motel" District; 3. That the subject property was previously approved by the Community Development Board (CDB) at its meeting of September 20, 2005, for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for 27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 17 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would have otherwise been permitted by Code; 4. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with overnight accommodations and nonresidential uses to the west along South Gulfview Boulevard and attached dwellings to the east along Brightwater Drive; 5. That the proposed building measures 78 feet in height (to mean roof); 6. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property; 7. That the development proposal is consistent with the "Small Motel" District of Beach by Design; 8. That the development proposal is consistent with the Design Guidelines and color palette of Beach by Design and further that those colors consist of: dark beige (SW2018), pale yellow-green (SW2353), pale yellow-green (SW2354), pale green (SW2367), pale blue (SW2410), and light tan (SW2445); 9. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3- 913.A; and 10. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of Section 2-803.C. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit; 2. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 3. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 4. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 5. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 6. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 7. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 6 of 7 b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 8. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 9. That the first building permit be applied for within one year of the Community Development Board approval (by November 15, 2006); 10. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 11. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 12. That measures to enhance the sight visibility of these parking spaces are accommodated prior to the issuance of any building permits; 13. That prior to the issuance any building permits the means by which seepage and accumulated water will be evacuated from the sublevel must be identified and deemed acceptable by the City's Engineering Department; 14. That the development proposal is revised to provide adequate accommodations for recycling containers prior to the issuance of any building permits; Prepared by Planning Department Staff: ew? Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBWamden Dr 342 -Gem Tower (7) - 11-15-05 - RTHamden Drive 342 - Staff Report 11-15-05.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - November 15, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 7 of 7 0 0 CDB Meeting Date: September 20, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-07066 Agenda Item: F.7. Owner / Applicant: Jerry and Teresa Tas Agent: Keith E. Zayac Address: 342 Hamden Drive and 343 Coronado Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building height from 35 feet to 83 feet (to roof deck) with an additional seven feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 14.94 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive and to 71.64 feet along Hamden Drive as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. EXISTING ZONING / Tourist (T) District. LAND USE: Resort Facility High (RFH) Category. PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodations (27 units). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (20 units). ADJACENT ZONING / North: Tourist (T) District - Overnight Accommodations. LAND USE: South: Tourist (T) District - Overnight Accommodations. East: Tourist (T) District - Overnight Accommodations; and Preservation (P) District - Clearwater Harbor. West: Tourist (T) District - Overnight Accommodations / Retail. CHARACTER OF THE The surrounding area predominantly consists of overnight IMMEDIATE VICINITY: accommodation uses with nonresidential uses to the west along South Gulfview Boulevard and attached dwellings to the east along Brightwater Drive. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 1 of 7 0 0 ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.35-acre subject property, which is located along the south side of Brightwater Drive between Coronado and Hamden Drives, has a zoning designation of Tourist (T) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Resort Facilities High (RFH). The property is also located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Small Motel" District. According to the City's records, the subject property presently consists of two separate buildings, which function as a single development. The property at 342 Hamden Drive consists of a two-story building with an accessory swimming pool and river rock deck, while the property at 343 Coronado Drive consists of a one-story building with an accessory wood deck and shuffleboard court. The development also consists of back out parking in the Brightwater Drive, Coronado Drive and Hamden Drive rights-of-way. The immediate vicinity is predominantly comprised of overnight accommodation uses with nonresidential uses to the west along South Gulfview Boulevard and attached dwellings to the east along Brightwater Drive. Development Proposal: The development proposal consists of the demolition of the existing improvements on the subject properties and the construction of an 83-foot high building (as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck) containing 20 condominium units that range in size from a 1,650 square foot two-bedroom unit to a 2,100 square foot two-bedroom unit with den. The existing back out parking within the Brightwater Drive and Hamden Drive rights-of-way will be removed and replaced with sod and a five-foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the property line, while the back out parking within the Coronado Drive right-of-way will be removed and replaced with sod and on- street parking. It is noted that no sidewalk presently exists adjacent to the subject property. The development proposal also includes the provision of a roof top swimming pool, sundeck, gazebo and garden. Lot Width: Pursuant to Section 2-803, the minimum required lot width for attached dwellings is between 50 feet and 100 feet. The subject property is approximately 67.5 feet in width along Coronado Drive, 71.64 feet in width along Hamden Drive, and 220 feet in width along Brightwater Drive. It is noted that the adjacent properties to the south, which account for the balance of the block, are associated with the approved development for 325 South Gulfview Boulevard (Lucca Development). Therefore, there is no opportunity for consolidation of the properties; thus the reduction to lot widths, as requested, can be supported. Building Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwellings are required to provide a front setback of 0-15 feet, a side setback of 0-10 feet, and a rear setback of 10-20 feet. The subject property consists of three front setbacks (north, east and west) and one side setback (south), and the development proposal requires reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 14.94 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 14.88 (to building/pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement). The requested reductions to the front (north/west) setbacks to the building are minimal and can be supported. The balance of the requested reductions are to either walkways, parking spaces or the refuse staging area. Concerning the walkways and refuse staging area, the reductions can be supported; however the reductions to the parking spaces, while justifiable in their necessity to support the dwelling units, raise questions as to the whether there is too much development proposed on the site due to the amount of pavement associated with the reduction. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 2 of 7 • Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwellings units require the provision of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Therefore, the proposed 20 attached dwelling units require a total of 30 parking spaces and the development proposal includes the provision of 22 parking spaces on the ground level and 8 parking space on the second level, which are accessible via a lift (30 total). With regard to the parking spaces on the second level, there is a concern with regard to their accessibility from the lift. From a vehicle's position on the lift, the vehicle can drive forward to access two of the parking spaces; however in order to access the other six parking spaces, a vehicle would need to drive in reverse off of the lift and back into the majority of the parking spaces. The design/layout of the parking area is atypical and does raise some safety concerns, and while these parking spaces are accessible, their accessibility is rather limited. The parking and the development as a whole would likely be better served with fewer dwellings, as fewer parking spaces would be required and a more efficient layout could be utilized. Building Height: The width of the building along Hamden and Coronado Drives (east and west elevations) measures approximately 38 feet and the width along Brightwater Drive (north elevation) measures approximately 194 feet. The height of the building measures 83 feet to the roof deck with an additional 7 feet for perimeter parapets and 18 feet for architectural embellishments; thereby resulting in a total height of 101 feet. When viewed from its east and west elevations, it is apparent that the height of the building is disproportionate to its width. In addition to the above, it is noted that the standard allowable height for perimeter parapets is 30 inches, nearly one-third of the height that is proposed. Modifications could be made to the development proposal that would result in a building height more in proportion and compatible with its width and at the same time increase the development proposals' compliance with Beach by Design. Reductions to the building height would likely reduce the dwelling unit count, which in turn would reduce the number of required parking spaces and possibly enable the provision of additional landscaping on site or modifications to the second level of parking to address accessibility and safety concerns. It is noted that at its meeting of July 17, 2005, the Board approved a development proposal which accounted for the balance of the block. This development proposal (325 South Gulfview Boulevard - Lucca Development) consisted of the construction of a 64-foot high building on the abutting parcels to the south. Solid Waste: The development proposal includes the provision of a trash and recycling holding area along the north side of the building with a 5-foot by 10-foot refuse staging area adjacent to the proposed driveway at Brightwater Drive. Termination of Status of Nonconformity: The development proposal includes a request for termination of status of nonconformity to permit 20 of the 27 existing overnight accommodation dwelling units to remain as attached (condominium) dwelling units, where only 10 attached dwelling units would otherwise be permitted. The criteria for termination of status of nonconformity, as per Section 6-109, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off-street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory uses/structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. However, while these criteria have been met, the resulting density in combination with the narrowness of the site and its location along three rights-of-way produces a development that requires the virtual elimination of the north and south setbacks to pavement, the provision of an atypical parking configuration where safety concerns will exist, and a building height that is disproportionate to the building width. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 3 of 7 9 • Consistent Inconsistent 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202.D shall X be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards X established in Section 3-1202.E. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or X accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be X used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Beach by Design: In 1997 and 1998, a Plan was prepared for the City entitled "Clearwater Beach: Strategies for Revitalization. " This Plan was prepared after an extensive public process, directive surveys and input from the City Council and City administration. The purpose of Beach by Design, which was adopted by the City Council in 2001, is to implement the recommendations of that Plan and regulate development within certain areas of the beach. The subject property is located within the "Small Motel" District of the Beach by Design special area redevelopment plan and is defined as an area of small motels with established clientele and limited on- site amenities and off-street parking. While Beach by Design does not specifically put forth guidelines for the redevelopment of property within the portion of the "Small Motel" District between Coronado and Hamden Drives, it does draw a correlation between the redevelopment of this area and the redevelopment of the Brightwater Drive area to which Beach by Design does specifically call for the development of mid-rise townhouses/timeshares between two and four stories above parking. While the subject property is not located along the "finger" of Brightwater Drive, it does have a significant amount of frontage along Brightwater Drive (220 feet) and as such the subject property should be consistent with these guidelines. The proposed building measures 83 feet to roof deck, which far exceeds the standard height set forth in Beach by Design for this area. Further, as proposed, the density will be roughly twice that which is permitted by code (57.14 du/ac), and the number of parking spaces required to accommodate these dwelling units will necessitate that the setbacks along the front (north) of the property and side (south) of the property need to be reduced to zero feet. Finally, in order to fit the proposed dwelling units on the property (a property which does not meet the minimum required lot width), a building 83 feet in height will need to be constructed. Based upon the above, the development proposal appears to constitute too much development for the subject property, and should be reduced in scale. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 4 of 7 0 • Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria (Section 2-803.C): The following table depicts the development proposals inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria pursuant to Section 2-803.C: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and X development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting X properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel X proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the X immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street X parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist (T) District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. General Applicability Standards (Section 3-913.A): The following table depicts the development proposals inconsistencies with the General Applicability Standards pursuant to Section 3-913.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. X 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. X 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent X Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 5 of 7 • Compliance with Standards and Criteria (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-801.1 and 2- 803.3: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 30 dwelling units per 20 dwelling units X* acre (10 dwelling units) Impervious 0.95 0.73 X Surface Ratio Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 s q. ft. 15,269 square feet (0.35 acres) X Lot Width 50 - 100 feet 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive; X** 71.64 feet along Hamden Drive; and 220 feet along Brightwater Drive Height 35 - 100 feet 83 feet (to roof deck) X*** Parking Spaces 1.5 spaces per unit 30 spaces (1.5 spaces per unit) X (30 spaces) Front Setback 0-15 feet North: 14.94 feet (to building) X**** 0 feet to pavement) East: 15 feet to bldg/ vmnt) X West: 14.88 feet (to bldg/pvmnt) X**** Side Setback 0-10 feet South: 10 feet (to building) X**** 0 feet (to pavement) * See above discussion with regard to Termination of Status of Nonconformity. ** See above discussion with regard to Lot Width. *** See above discussion with regard to Beach by Design. **** See above discussion with regard to Setbacks. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with this site. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building height from 35 feet to 83 feet (to roof deck) with an additional seven feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 feet to 14.94 feet (to building) and zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 feet to 67.5 feet along Coronado Drive and to 71.64 feet along Hamden Drive as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Section 6-109, based upon the following recommended findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law: Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.35 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Small Motel" District; Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 6 of 7 • • 3. That the development proposal does not comply with the "Small Motel" District of Beach by Design; 4. That the subject property is currently developed with 27 overnight accommodation units; 5. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 10 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 6. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with overnight accommodations and nonresidential uses to the west along South Gulfview Boulevard and attached dwellings to the east along Brightwater Drive; 7. That the height of the proposed building is 83 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 8. That the parking circulation on the second level does not function adequately and provides only limited accessibility; 9. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property; 10. That the development proposal meets the requirements for a termination of status of nonconformity as per Section 6-109 to permit 20 dwelling units where 10 units would otherwise be allowed; 11. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3- 913.A; and 12. That the development proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of Section 2-803.C. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: 1???/l 1 Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBWamden Dr 342 -Gem Tour (7) - 09-20-05 - RTIHamden 342 Staff Report. doe Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07066 - 7 of 7 L:i L-7 PnawrAr ? Pp,M ?AniJn BAYMONr sr `?ORF W SAN < Q W t F poWT PPPAYA sr kyY PASSA4E f Piar6o O cauY era WkOWARD P 8 'R 0 fmsr sr 0 UR SRO Sr PROJECT SITE W ° WATER _DR RFR/ m RAVSICE C? ?YwAr a sew k ? ?J oLvo A r e ? 9 A? ss 0 Location Map Owner. Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas Case: FLD2005-07066 Site: 342 Hamden Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.35 PIN: 08/29/15/17604/000/0070 Atlas Page: 276A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Hamden Dr 342 - Gem Tour (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Hamden 342 - Location Map.doc • r -'`-, ----_, `-_ 1 301 261 301 t1 300,' r 305 `1 1 j - 1 308 I309 ^ L-- I ; r-- 31 # j 312 `- 1 315 316 31$-__I 1 / 1317 t-_ ^`?^ 6 ' x 320 i 1 / 316 132q 1 1 t 1"`-3 6 i 7 1 7 1 ,. 1325 L I 3 r l I 1 330 1 1 1 ?; `z_J - rl I 1 ?1 __ 1 3 a? _ 1 33a - ///?? - _ ? i, r : '`? _I t O? I om.. /lam ? ? ' of l?47 + J w Vl ?_ w 9 1 341 V ^' 347 3 ``?,?{p? 1 I t ' t 4? 645 /I 0 C ro t __ ), ? 13$1 'i -12- / _.J II 1 T 3'I° .346 1 11 1 1 1 1 w ``, '` I -.j ' ? .. 3G9 ---------- r 353 I `r ?, 346j - _/ 1 1 -Vf ---------I I Off 1_t 1 1 1 _ ? ?_ _ I ! 408/1 ! / r 410 ------- j 1 415 I ri i_ L_q 1 0 ! ' 1 _-`- ?? 1 t 1. " JN ` I 412 ?- r t t 1 I t-E} --r 421 ;1 1 1 L 129 1-1 420 V% __?l I p _? w Q31 I m '%431 2 Zoning Map Owner. Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas I Case: FLD2005-07066 Site: 342 Hamden Drive Property 0.35 Size(Acres): PIN: 08/29/15/17604/000/0070 Atlas Page: 276A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Namden Dr 342 - Gem Tour (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Namden 342 - Zoning Map.doc a r ? ?, -`-? -----, 251 1 '----I I- ?- j 301 3004, verni t I , f ACC r ?iSr L""9 - I 1 -'y f _r 1 r-- Park `- i h ?-- L - ve -- g t - 31 312 i 315 ',-A m lotions 5 r--_ 31 31J-__I l I 1317 I-_ 15 esta R #a r 3 1321 1 1 / n fee ass 0 I L 3 3 ? 2 5 ' (i ??32 i f??7 f _t j ?1Q t-1 -I 325 ; ' ,lit b 1 / O'Yil / t,0 S i / - 11 3p_ - ''-/ --? ; __j ?av ight ? % r r -- I- odati s ; o c J " H 311 L7p BRIGyTy A y T 1 ER DR S 347 _Q ,O ; 1 10 L314, 351 'I ?_ O 346 J 30 1, O? . w ^ = ^ Pt t ?? b?liltIQ11D 1 i , / I (? , _l ---1 Park ------- SS co i ---I T I/R?staurant? f_?f'?, / / 411 L U4at18 S I_, I I 4091 1 `? ?_, A., ' ^_•-_ Overnight ?_! et I ? $ t o ?- _ t r'-- ____i / wO ? 410 A eQmmodatio/1 1415 I 1 412 421 L.420 Z ; _ BA _arg _ DR ' _ t I-I 420 V% / ! or-? w + ' od fns+Ai Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas Case: FLD2005-07066 Site: 342 Hamden Drive Property 0.35 Size(Acres): PIN: 08/29/15/17604/000/0070 Atlas Page: 276A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Hamden Or 342 - Gem Tour (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Hamden 342 - Existing Uses Map.doc a a law }y T 6?al i ? = ?- i f' ?? .le . ? ? R ?J? _ .1110 IF IF ? • `? s. Nrp?p • Lw, '? 'i• + !11 r31. r ' 106'' - =' Aerial Map Owner. Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas Case: FLD2005-07066 Site: 342 Hamden Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.35 PIN: 08/29/15/17604/000/0070 Atlas Page: 276A SAI'lanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Hamden Dr 342 - Gem Tour (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Hamden 342 - Aerial Majo.doc a 40 Looking southeast across Brightwater Drive at the subject property. Looking south across Brightwatea Drive at the subject property. Looking southwest across Brightwater Drive toward subject property. Looking west toward the property immediately north of the subject property. low. Looking southwest along Hamden Drive at the subject property and properties further to the south. 342 Hamden Drive FLD2005-07066 11 • ?: a law- A Amid 4" I .• ? r .? - ?? r aX _` a M J t ? v ? i1• J ? rj moor;--, JNI 7. JON% -5 1 C coo. Kr• ' a • ' tt 4 ' Aerial Map Owner: Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas Case: FLD2005-07066 Site: .342 Hamden Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.35 PIN: 08/29/15/17604/000/0070 Atlas Page: 276A s: \manning uepartment\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Hamden Dr 342 - Gem Tour (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Hamden 342 - Aerial Map.doc • AOfT(FMAY ?Ad1n BAYMON7 sr pplw PAPAYA ST kY P tiggA6E K g al ? Pwaa Q Cpll®Wly WRAWARO P ?R E9287 87 PROJECT '"'"° at OR SITE 41 ° F Y QR7 WATER OR 9FiH BAYSCE C, a4?Y e s Bow vu W- Ad SS 0 Location Map Owner. Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas Case: FLD2005-07066 Site: 342 Hamden Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.35 PIN: 08/29/15/17604/000/0070 Atlas Page: 276A 5.\P?anning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Hamden Dr 342 - Gem Tour (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Hamden 342 - Location Map.doc • ? ?- i -\ 251 1 "'--- 301 1 - ^ 1 `? //? //// 1 , 1 ' ? 1 //? y r- . i}K I I / - 30,5 1 V V L_ 1 X79 r l I$9 -I -r f 37 L __rl 312 ` 1 t 1 1 ^? / 311 r --; ifs LyfS___ ± LI-J- 319 ---i / 1317 r__ ,,.^ b 711 1 '' f 1 I 1 132?I f r 3P ?_ I 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1_._rj `329 1 I _ 325 I 1 "?`? I L 1330 AV31 !? it 1 OS///?? ?_-. `? 1? 1 332 .- 7 I_? _/ 1 /1\ T h 1 34f 347 I II 135''1 r I? ?'`r 111 0 ?ypg-w?rl ^J,? o. ??/ 34g _ `I 1 355 --------J ! ll`I . . P I 406 4f1 1''?_ 1 t,.. _ I / a-, ?O 1 I t r--_ J 410 1 I t1 IJ 412 \ J t ?_ - ry i I?- J- 421 r°`\ I I I L--tr 1 ' ` 1 420 / 1 420 L --_ 1 1 103 a ? ! r w 1 ^r p? 1 1 ?? '??I r_ % 7 \' r ?i I 11431A1 Zoning Map Owner. Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas Case: FLD2005-07066 Site: 342 Hamden Drive Property 0.35 Size(Acres): PIN: 08/29/15/17604/000/0070 Atlas Page: 276A ?:\rtanntng department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) Wending cases\Up for the next CDB\Hamden Dr 342 - Gem Tour (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Hamden 342 - Zoning Map.doc 0 0 301 - `; -----, `-_ 300 251 11 301 300 ' , verni t Acc l(Isr 1 I + , r- +309 , Park r- - ?--_ Wi 312 `°'.' -- `-- Ve Ight 316 i? __ LI-A m dations 31,1 ? 319--_I 16 esta i-°-, R ail r"' + 3 132 1 0 fee 3 - 6 1 1 - r_ 25 3 ight + 1 r 1330 r 0111 t1 s _ r? ilV tight _ , -? ! - ? - E_„ odati s o ' o , A c ' 311 C ATER D/Q S 347 11 1351, , 511 O t fl w' N for P t 1 2 II r t ` R , -- i L ' Park F -- ' aaf ------- co r + ? I 901-`? / -?, r ight? e 411 L O do s _ Overnight e ' `'o`-,? 1 A cpmmadatioki ; t r--- 5 , _ -_ 41 , 4,o 412 _ 421 `420 BAY ED L S/D , R 420 -- 1 1% 440 11 r- _j I v, Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. Jerry Tas, Teresa Tas Case: FLD2005-07066 Site: 342 Hamden Drive Property 0 35 Size(Acres): . PIN: 08/29/15/17604/000/0070 Atlas Page: 276A ,D: \rrannrng uepcfamem\c. u d\rLtx (rtu) \renarng cases\Up for the next CDB\Hamden Dr 342 -Gem Tour (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Hamden 342 - Existing Uses Map.doc 9 L 4k 7 01' sr_ *?-. Looking southeast across Brightwater Drive at the subject property- M Looking southwest across Brightwater Drive toward subject property. 11 Looking south across Brightwater Drive at the subject property. Looking southwest along Hamden Drive at the subject property and properties further to the south. 342 Hamden Drive FLD2005-07066 Looking west toward the property immediately north of the subject property. 9 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, November 15, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. Jerry and Teresa Tas are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 17 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 78 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 14 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr and 343 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 and part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft,'Planner III. FLD2005-07066 2. Griffin International, Inc. is requesting Flexible Development approval to permit Alcoholic Beverage Sales in the Commercial (C) District on a parcel of land contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Sec 2-704.C. (Proposed Use: Alcoholic Beverage Sales) at 1575 Highland Ave S, Sec 23-29-15, M&B 34.03. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-08082 3. Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc, and North Clearwater Beach Development, LLC (Anthony Menna) are requesting 1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (11 existing attached dwelling units to remain where a maximum of 10 attached dwelling units would be permitted under current Code); 2) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr under the provisions of Secs 4-1402 and 4-1403; and 3) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwelling units in the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 59.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 42 inches for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 2 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 1.5 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pool deck), and to allow 5 parking spaces to encroach within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4-5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-08087 4. 400 Cleveland, LLC, Mainstreet Clearwater Development, and Whtbuff, Inc (TH Management, LLC, Laura Street Development, LLC) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development in the Downtown (D) District with 245 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 36 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 186,300 sq ft of non- residential floor area (restaurant, retail/movie theater, and existing office), an increase in the • • permitted height from 30 ft to 380 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 27 ft for architectural embellishments as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2- 903.C. [Proposed Use: Mixed-Use (245 attached dwellings, 98,500 sq ft retail/restaurant/movie theatre, and 87,800 sq ft office)] at 400, 410, 418, & 420 Cleveland St and 416 Laura St, Sec 16-29-15, M&B 12-03, Earl & Tate's Sub Lots 1, 3, 5, 7, 9-10, 19-21 and part of lots 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 17, & 18. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-08084 5. Ronald E & Karen L Kozan (Newkirk Ventures Inc) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the addition of a pool to a previously approved attached dwelling project (FLD2005-05045, approved August 16, 2005) in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (26 condominiums) with pool] at 405 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 15 & S 'h of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 08086 6. Dam Devon LLC (City of Clearwater) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a parking lot in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to minimum lot area from 20,000 sq ft to 16,500 sq ft, a reduction to the front (north along Devon Dr/First Ave) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement) and a reduction to the front (east along Hamden Dr) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Public parking lot for 25 parking spaces) at 41 Devon Dr, Columbia Sub, Blk B, E Y2 of Lot 1. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08089 7. Peter Pan Developments LLC (Panayiotis Vasiloudes, Petrit Meroli, Somerset Condominium) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the minimum lot area from 15,000 sq ft to 13,087 sq ft, reductions to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 120 ft along Bay Esplanade and from 150 ft to 110 ft along Somerset St, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 22 ft (to water feature), reductions to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 11 ft (to building and pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 46.83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Bay Esplanade from 5 ft to 3 ft (for the retention pond planting area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset St from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)] at 693-699 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 76 & unplatted Blk 76. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08090 8. Peter Pan Development LLC & Epic HoldinEs South LLC (Bay Esplanade Condominium) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 13 ft (to water feature), reductions to the front (north) setback along Somerset St from 15 ft to 12.67 ft (to building), from 15 ft to 9.83 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 46.83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to permit the building within the visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)] at 685-689 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 12-13, & part of Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08088 9. Jaycee Roth is requesting an appeal of an administrative determination denying the ability to apply for an Animal Boarding Facility use as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project in the Downtown East Gateway Character District, per Sec 3-502. (Proposed Use: Animal Boarding Use) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub Lot 3 & parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. APP2005-00002 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 10/30/05 FLD2005- 6 - 55 rAMERICANA GULF MOTELS LTD PTR BELLE AQUA VILLAS LLC 325 S GULFVIEW BLVD PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE 6033 CRIMSON CT MCLEAN VA 22101 - 1818 BOLDOG, DOROTHY C THE M & J TRUST PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 BRENNAN, KEVIN P 130 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CANTERBURY OAKS INC 401 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 Clearwater Beach Association Jay Keyes 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 BUKOWSKI, WLADYSLAW BUKOWSKI, KRYSTYNA 345 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2450 CANTERBURY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT T L S HOLDINGS INC 421 GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2508 Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Doug Williams, President 2544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 CZAICKI, EDWARD D'AMICO, LOUIS J CZAICKI, BOZENA 410 HAMDEN DR 332 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2535 CLEARWATR BEACH FL 33767 - 2448 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 401 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 FIFTH SOUTH LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 GIBSON, EVELYN L 1206 MELVIEW CT ST LOUIS MO 63125 - 4614 HIGHLANDER ROCK INC 415 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2537 GIOVANNI, ROBERT KOZIK, CHRISTIAN 317 CORONADO DR # B CLEARWATER BEACH FL 33767 - 2433 J M B & A DEVELOPERS LLC 1947 PETERS PL CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7597 IL -r - *BOLDOG, CLA RA BOLDOG, DOROTHY 2500 VIRGINIA AVE NW UNIT 1405 WASHINGTON DC 20037 - 1901 BOLDOG, DOROTHY PO BOX 8589 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 8589 CANNEY, SCOTT W 314 WESTERN AVE ALLEGAN MI 49010 - 1241 CAVANAUGH, MICHAEL C 300 S SCHMALE CAROL STREAM IL 60188 - 2702 CRYSTAL BEACH CAPITAL LLC 101 E KENNEDY BLVD STE 2125 TAMPA FL 33602 - 5189 DIFERDINANDO, RITA H 9220 RUMSEY RD # 101 COLUMBIA MD 21045 - 1956 GIADLA, WERONIKA GIADLA, ALOJZY 355 S GULFVIEW BLVD CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2445 GOOSEN, EDWIN P GOOSEN, ODESSA L 130 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 JZMCCORP 415 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 KALLAS, DORA Keith E Zayac, PE, RLA L O M INC KALLAS, GEORGE 701 Enterprise Rd, Ste 404 4100 N 28TH TERR 3405 GULF BLVD Safety Harbor, FL 34695 HOLLYWOOD FL 33020 - 1116 BELLEAIR BCH FL 33786 - 3644 s' LITTLE, DAVID R 1734 CASEY JONES CT CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1701 MARKS, IRWIN J MARKS, DAWN D 115 BRIGHTWATER DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2402 PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 419 EASTSHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 SHAH, MANNA J 2221 NORWEGIAN DR # 33 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - 2961 SUN WEST PALMS DEV LLC 100 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 TIDSWELL INC 419 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2506 VASILAROS, SOPHIA 111 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 ZIMMERMANN, GUNDER 12912 CASTLEMAINE DR TAMPA FL 33626 - 4470 LUCCA DEVELOPMENT LLC 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1008 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1795 MAZZON, MAURIZIO 110 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2501 R T V PROPERTIES INC PO BOX 3835 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 8835 SIMON, RICHARD A 1474 S PAIRIE AVE #D CHICAGO IL 60605 - 2884 SZLECHTA, WLODZIMIERZ KUNOWSKA, EWA 333 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 TROPICAL BREEZE OF CLEARWATER 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 WAZIO, EUGENIUSZ F WAZIO, IRENA 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 MALKE, ROBERT E MALKE, TERESA L PO BOX 2124 LARGO FL 33779 - 2124 PALMTOPPER CONDO ASSN INC 110 BRIGHTWATER DR # 4 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 ROGERS, ROLAND 321 CORONADO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2433 STANTON, BRIAN J STANTON, DORIS 130 BRIGHTWATER DR # 5 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2401 TAS, JERRY TAS,TERESA 342 HAMDEN DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2451 TROPICANA RESORT LAND TRUST 163 BAYSIDE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2502 WILK, THOMAS J WILK, STASIA 451 HARBOR DR S INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - 3118 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (reconsidered from 07/19/05) The City of Clearwater is requesting reconsideration of the attached sign approved through the Comprehensive Sign Program application contained within the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application that approved a problematic use for Amscot Financial in this location. [Proposed Use: Problematic Use (Amscot)] at 1874 North Highland Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-01004 2. Ardent International LLC., Panaviotis and Helen Vasiloudes (M3B Development LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade & 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lots 1 & 3 and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 3. Raim & Xheziie Tzekas [A Very Important Pet (AVID) Salon] are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow pet grooming and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store and to permit a 6-ft tall fence located in front of the building (approximately 5 ft back from the N Lincoln Ave frontage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Pet Grooming/Outdoor Training Facility) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub, Lot 3 and parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John Schodder, Planner I. FLD2005-06058 4. Harborside Condo LLC (Mark Newkirk) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 15 attached dwelling units proposed, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 12.4 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4.3 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.8 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 87.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo, Units 1-12 & 14-17. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07070 v 5. K&P Clearwater Estate II LLC (Mark International LLC, Sunrise on the Beach Inc) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 90 ft along Coronado Dr and Hamden Dr, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.5 ft (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.13. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 229 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub Replat, parts of Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07061 6. LOPA LLC (Patricia A. Bilotta & Lorri S. Ritter) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 3 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 14 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (5 spaces) to 1.33 spaces per dwelling units (4 spaces), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 1254 Grove St, Property of AJ Moore, Lots 14 & 15. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05042 7. Coates I, Inc. is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 9 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 621 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay unit No 5 Replat, Blk 78, Lots 5 & 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07064 8. Jerry & Teresa Tas are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 14.94 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 & part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: l_ob-ert=G---TeffttPPPllanner III. FLD2005-07066 9. Hess Properties H LLC, and Bay Esplanade Properties LLC (Stephen T Hess) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 51.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 64 & 566 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 79, Lots 3, 18 & 19 (less R/W for Clearwater St), and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07065 10. Seawake Motel Ltd (Enchantment, LLC) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 15.7 ft ( to sidewalk) and from 20 ft to 14 ft (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of 3 dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Dr, 4 dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Dr and 1 dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 691 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 16-19 & Rip Rts & land on S of Lot 19. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 11. Clearwater Grande Dev LLC (Steve J Page) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 17.6 ft (to open stairs) and from 20 ft to 8.8 ft (to pool deck), an increase to the building ht from 35 ft to 99.5 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 645-655 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07072 12. Canterbury Property Mgt Inc, TLS Holdings Inc, Dorothy C Boldog Tre, and Canterbury Oaks Inc are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 5.45 ft (to building), from 15 ft to zero ft (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth St.) setback from 15 ft to 3.63 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a ., J 0 r reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 401, 411, & 421 S Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 72-77, 121-122, 124, 128-129 & parts of Lots 123 & 127. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07068 13. KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east)setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off- street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 14. Parkdale LLC (Belleair Harbor, LLC, Maria Nikolova) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 ft to 60 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and preliminary plat approval for 2 lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units)] at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park I" Add Replat Blk C, Lot 5 & Sub Land. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06056 15. Homeless Emergency Proiect is requesting Flexible Development application to permit the redevelopment and expansion of an existing residential shelter (including the expansion of the kitchen and dining area), in the Commercial District, to maintain the existing front, side and rear setbacks with the exception of a front (south) setback of 4 ft (to dumpster enclosure), and to permit off site parking, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of i ? Sec 2-704.C and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 18 units) at 1200 Betty Ln, Fair Burn Add Blk C, Lots 7- 9. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07063 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 09/04/05 0 f GEM VILLAS RESIDENCES CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA RECEIVED OCT 17 2005 pLpNNIN DEPARTMENT CITY OF A ER RECEIVED 206 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER • i i Np O CID Y 0 AMM Ali, ElR1G1MMTER MVE OCT 17 , iJ1 PLANNING K ?E ?.t X11 Svcs, • 1? i OCT ± 7200 P':J,h:yr,(-, r, ;)c . r , OHMEN-i SVCS CD W7 CEVLON 7E!2eAc.o'TrA, CLAY TIL.e- G P-OA M --- _ - Itit ss? C N % H A PPL 5 w -- L (LA? j f q -- _ - - PA TL I G.ovaoon I_?'Mfl?' III?I?JI 'r n° ? ? (1 ? ! [:--J?f:-?-,.--y' .I yl ?? BFI ?G??Q i r . Ch LA% _ ( t U L; Q - - --- - Lj f w ti I TE G? FRAM le • W H t TIF ! i. 1 I sw 29g5 II IZ3s? ! C.; B _?:: ?I T;, sw 2oc8 TIM 2,367 r S 10 +r w 2353 Irr(( I ? ?? 1 t P INK BEIGr- 0 QTN LOGG lA ?'AR1SGE sw 2o18 [0 i i? 1?0VVIM OCT ± ? W JL P,^. `OPMENTSVCS C) 15 7 ?1?1 P ? i °Z i eAMSINq 2v SPAc?s tiRiG;NAL 'sJB, Le OE L ?- fARrC Ir?U W/ L,ANPSCAP D TDP ANGVLA2 ?.?c?sS 'T'? FAT wt,E i.?T of ??JjLpjrj(n PRoF1LF- uPP P R P L-a o R5 \, 15, OCT 17 200 PtAr. 131. oPrN UoC-44 tA (S1 S-ET13AC.t4 A4L AQDOPl 1.A10D5CAPel) -pe v r: L u f VAC- N S EG'T ? o Ti / PQo FLLE P\AC7 9-#.t4 11- 2 wta x. N i . .JL57 53 , yu,a x NT. iA Le VF-- L. L.A mE>5CA PAP cooeR OUee. PAr-tKi NCB I I ? 's a s art ? x ,..??..._......lilb..,.. ism 4141116 1111M TIMM ..... ... d..Room r??sn?rM.w z _ z 1 O1O4F11?11!ltDIrYE ? \ ...`.= ?"'"_, i +&M PLAN 1 i1 = 101-011 i Gillett Associates AAD'?6AOUn Ashmmm • PLuofog se..n.r.d.S d 1543-103 S.r , 7 42+e sa o ila 7.447 v 941-957-4151 F. dd?dtc® W z w ? a m OATS ?14w? d owuMt fMs aoeta r . +.:r m?IMIll /Ot iR A2.01 oRtINA L cr ! ? zoo.r PLAI 4 4 BUILDING_ AREA TA5ULATIONS SPACES UNITS ENCLOSED BLDG TERRR4CE AREA (8F) GROSS PARKING SUB LEVEL 20 0 1,192 0 PARKING LEVEL 1 6 0 1,192 0 TYPICAL LEVEL 2 3 1052 140 TYPICAL LEVEL 3 3 1052 140 TYPICAL LEVEL 4 3 1AP52 140 TYPICAL LEVEL 5 3 1052 140 TYPICAL LEVEL 6 3 1052 140 TYPICAL LEVEL 1 I 3,500 10 TYPICAL LEVEL. S 1 31000 10 TOTAL BUILDMG RESIDENTIAL UNITS : m UNITS TOTAL ENCLOSED OUILDING AREA. 59,848 TOTAL TERRACE AREA: 4,880 CONDO PARKNG= 26 SPACES (INCLUDING 2 NC) woomwop" CD s:R! a Gillett Associi= ARDT GROUP cDll0.1- ,!L-- 1543-IM 7?s.1f?15®d SDI[ 34236 e?aa, 941-M-4151 Pa w U W CD A W? m a a w 1" = 10'-0" A2.02 Gill A i ett ssoc ates ARUI ROUe Aal?Ctae•PL®B w•rr.?r. 1543-IM S.-d am 34296 S ,sati? 941A37.4131 Ps W U A CD ?6?. ef t K= FLM aw9 1"= 101-011 m a a? 5 w m nw ¦O ist ? M A2.03 Gill A d aeo ett ates wear aeour ,O.y?.3. V.. sm:? 3 941-(574477 x1-957-4151 Pa t ))tt ! ` `yJ, _ 3333` R.4= PLAN 1"= 10'-07' W U z W A CD w ¦ 0 ?- ao w? i 7 A2.04 L + it V is "'ti. aY e O ? IM GMNIM I -Off It d 1 A G aus etc seo i ARD GROUP Li A • eo?e c E 15I3-101 3dE If it 34236 Sr W 77 14V 941-957-4151 n/ W U z a CD M 1???J I 5 Y ¦ fNf A2.05 d Gill A aus seo ett AtD ?•OtOU? Aefiibctia•PLoe? S?e+gri.l?.. '543-im Smad sae S Fl 5 am -m 941-"7-4151 Pa 1 F? 11 ? ? Flom FLM .. 11 10'-0" y W U W A r a 5 O ¦ CD 70 m DAM CG?16? lu{ wA ? A2.06 Ivea1Y?N?aM, S41MY E F i 1{ ? {.., [1 , X1.01 ?.®.....?..m - ? er ? ¦pa - <Mltrne '. - _ - _ I'?G•I OV?fL RBI { eNfx . ?? ? TOP/PARAPET-? . _ -- _ ?OP?7F 9LA8? a5aa wlh:aAA. w as aAa. VINp¦W ? - - m - ?l - - LELELSp$ - - ? _ r - - LEYEL3? l1• ' M a0 4 Rva.fL _ _ - LEVEL {•MND eo lp - - - - -En-ELEV. 12 _ LEVEL I - - _ GRADE 5_0? _ - - _ - _ - 9UB-LEVEL • 4?P ?IIC SG1L6 rI= ? sr" NNW. 1't = 10' Ing Gillett Associates A !,GROUP Tlp !rs•1L.pi•Isdaa '513-Im Smend Sean Sam,= ,51215 "t."T-0u1 A. W U Qw G R F 12 c _ A 0577-3 ¦ I raa? aaalwa r waa?n • ?aaa¦ur, w r rr aar ap ear r a? • aw saw ¦¦arr wn n¦ wear ar n¦ .wear r r.... ? ps ram rp ?a aarl¦?r DATE CC 0119 n, 2005 0 CWVMGpt 2005 SCALE: V . q•-O• NORTH M"AnON SHEET kit"R: A3.0 1 NORTH ELEVATION 11 ll AW. KT 2122 • RM111 PUYW ??IOT.60Me /VJ?fTA?1 SOUTH ELEVATION -, Q J f'! MEGN OVER M, d D ? TOP/PARMETT - - N - TOP?OOF 9L.4B? em `r - _ _ - LE1?L5{ L _ _ _ - I FuF1 _4? - m - _ _ - lE1?L1-a 5m ELEV.. 121-0' I -_ LEVEL I GRADE • F-m' - 7? - - - , - 50 LEVEL -4'-W mu^c WA rst. 1 ri? GCMJ N NSR 1" =10' ¦?? Gfil U Associates ARDT GROUP Aecbi,cmee • ?B Ss??•N?•fada 1? ?421457-41y51 F?a-: Mt) M? W z AW 1?1 y d x.4e 0.x1 ¦ *r NYIr? r rrw v iwr ra r.n w?es????rrr? oraw?r???r a?rrvv?r• rrl? 1?1111?II\ NII?I` DATE: MOW fl, MOS ® Copyr1w 2006 SCALE: 1' . 10•.0' SOUM ZLITATWN SHEET NuNBER: A3.0 2 n n Q c-, - _ - _ I°ECH OVER RlN+ 9 TOP?'ARAPET-? _ TOPdaO?CF 9LA8+ S of ? - _ _ - LE1?15-? b+ ci - _ _ - JwEl?43-+ _-I EYE BFE ELEV.: 12'-0' _ LEVEL I - - - CfL1pE • 5'-0' Std LEVEL ` -4--C* WEST ELEVATION CD 6 MEC4 OVER "_,. a TOPMARAPET TOPiRI?Cf 9LA8+ 9 LEVE! 9-? ? - - -1F?.C1 l? ? _ - JwEf?Lb? u + - - - lEY£1.5-+ e? m lE1VE a 0 c+ BFf ELEV. • li'-0 ® - - - - . SSMRSc-q •dtnr scam N gar, 111 = 10' Ing Gillett Associate ARDT GROUP iMt O{.O{A2{O SrHS •Hri•{ida ISIitOI SSOOOd $Crt srf10f4? 51276 941457 ? U 0 s o? ¦ rr?Wrr w?nr .? O?1 ?? ri IwHw r ne rHwr M rr n{t r Hr• -mrft ? rvHn Hr ? sw-sw OATS OCT089 n, MOB 0 C:009M 2005 SCALE: T . am t TM S1S9know SHEET NIwER. A3.03 f, 7 HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL RO •.c A.r R•/m rvw •aRP?pw? ,1 ,l 1 1 ® M_ ' W W / E ?- Lai 0 W Q U J L ` g O ?U t?1 ..B PA•eR.R E`'?'n" me w§ 1 T ir HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL ?1'I ? •A wlGlcq MW Vt] TsY•6[ / P?WPL fr».1 R/ a'i'/Iane BDm ? o• bw 0+.1 LEGEND („Pt TW,cAL i b ?` GRAPHIC SCALE ••?••?••? I+RO,Ett 6pN0ARr ' Irr'?F---i•?--i o9snnG IIEE ro E REYO.ro _ 1W? mIn ? .. ... I9t?0 ?¢ PARMFFG ' _' T N / P'te'/1Nro A61m nE A[T S'? ? ?]GdP 9PT •9RIn iN/R11E (Tn.) u GENERAL NOTES: m 1. EN4TIEFA/LANOSCAPE ARCHITECT: NE1lN 2AYAD SE TES, SUITE Al EN PR;SE ROAD EAST, l0- D: LL SAFETY H-AR00R, R 3-695 ()2)) ]9]-9888 Hu ? p K : T2] ]91-9855 d < a 1. PARCEL ID n: OB/2D/15/1TSB6/001/0110 Y = ; PARCEL ID 2 06/29/ts/1 T60A/000/00]0 N? zNa Y ^M U 1 PRESENT USE 27 OVERNIGHT ACCCYYODATIONS ?. OE9ELDPm USE 17 MULTFAMLY CONOONNARI UNITS 1 TOTAL SITE AREA IS.-2, g (O.JS AC) 6. SEIBACXS: Rcr, imcy P,g??Q a 10-IS FRONT 1500 YN. (EASi i0BLDG.) =*5 ? IS. YM. W t A BLDG) 000' YIN. (NO TO SIDEWALK) 15.00 MIN. (NEST To WOG.) y Z o-IO' REAR tS.DO, MIN. (SOUTH TO BAm 1n, 71' Iwn. (Soj H To B.o.C.7 v a. ]. AuoWABLC WAX NE3 T u PT - 0 IN _ C 6 E" PROPOSED BLDG HEIGHT ]2 PT - 2 N MOM FEYA LINE TO ND-PONT 6 ROOF •L, Tn 6. SOLID WASTE -TEA ALL BE LOCATED IN BINIDING V 6 D. UCHTAIC WHIN P S ALL BE A D TO d - u S BI.9LD6+G AND AIL BE BE SUBIgnED IWTIEO A AS PART OF FINAL NAL NAAL BIRANG PLANS. y) Z U 10 EIOSTWG "'DAD "COTP, AREAS ' 6,336.22 7 " o.1- AC. y 11. ALL DISTURBED GRASS ADWI WONT-6-WAY e - BE SODDED. p 12. ALL UNUSED O65EWAYS YLAT BE REMOWD AND REPLACED WIN CURB SIOEWAUC An0 LANOSCANNG TO MATCH ERSTNO CO TIDNS 11 ROOD ZONE: TN,S PROPERTY LIE MMIN R000 LORE 'AE° AS DEPICTED 5? 2 ON MINA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP N0. 12IG3C=2G (VEER II a 12) j DATED: SE"E"BER S, 2003 ° (I 1-. A COYPRENENSA SNa+ PACKAGE WILL BE 9-0ATTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMT APPLfCA710N. L - 15 THERE ARE NO UTILITY EASEIAdTS IDENTIFlED BY THE SUINE ON THIS PROPERTY. 16. T11ETE ARE NO ENVIRC9AENTAUY UNIOUE AREAS ON SITE 17 . A 1200 RECREATtoN PACRJTY WPACT FEE IS DUE IM EAC NEW UNIT PABOR TO _ ISSUANCE OP BULDING PERMITS OR -1 PLAT (IF APP.IcAB£1 9NILx1 EVER OCCURS FlRST. ^ - CONTACT ART NADER AT )21.562A62A_ _ 10. DNpS1EA SERYCE SHALL BE ARRANGED AM SOLD WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR A THE _ _ ISSUANCE M AN OCCUPADONAI UDENSE OR CERTIFICATE O. OCCUPANCY. PLEASE CONTACT TOY QENF AT 727562.-930 9 9 19. R-2 DATA TAB2L ulmi& PIS ?461? A TOTAL STE UEA: I5,M9.21 4 (6M AC) 14M9 P 9 (0.35 X) to=. SF e. roTN, a SPAM 2609.' s (0.M K) 466523 SF (O a AD) -' SF (061 AC MAIL) C. W.aDING FoD- 6..1.16.22 s (0-1 19R) ).I92D0 s (0.b w) - C. SVENLLN/DEO(/PAUED APEA 6,32165 3 1.171.88 SF - F. TOTAL eVERMO/5 AwE 1265987 Y (662 1%) 9A63.96 9: (036 % 14,w574 SF (095 t5A MAX) C PAINAIG TA S: N/A M SPARES n (1 S flAIISSAIMT) E N. W)YON.M AREA - - - 1. INR0'F LDIc C,,E AREA. w A OWIFNiIT ACCQYWAMIIS: V UNITS D."S N/A T 4 .-AX. OIEWIAN W13 6 UNTS 1) UNITS 11 lNR (M UNTs/&cc ee.. a d,A .? ,, 3 OF 5 E I 2f CD 0 W W t- 1- C= c N a ? IJJ LJJ C9 o a LL 2 0 W z ce ?? t ? 4?4 A a xx.w v nc, s.ac PUNT SPACING DETAIL, (SECPON) as ww? GRAPHIC SCALE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES ,. wTM.p v?.a' <walp w v.•. pxnxs ar, w +.x?a m p...N oua. eA:.w w p?,...wT..° 1 «m pM, m.r+x..x 4 ,l...rv??xn p??w mu cuvpiw A•.?. LL:xw d 4nn?iM.p.. L?'.ewxw?a W mb...h p?u^'pic M Cp,m s .M..O am ? m m+,. ]. Y ywtlny pw b .mw .. aama.w .nn w .bnb M+?T?+,. aw Gs?. Ar.x.tlm. u°pa+a p•p?<?. •. Ywy... Yp 4 m.eo.e .m. 4a°+• A-fp-] bOxU w p? w -wp¢trp. m.u?ux. n <p]m<bn n - ! > ?•? cmmma4 MuOp•'.4 w I°Iw.. ]¢{ • ? ?p n.. .NV?rrhx.M _ pw..wa. m. ?°1?-4Krq pMNY Y ywy aM •naI r.wn ° ]' m1e. p m.w m.Ipv .wN x m b .°m'a-x .N +tia•'n?u. 1. nm? M.M x pwW n w w<l.nb a ts,ee<vp. Cap,aw x w mA., p ° ax</.•pxl _ ,M px+p?m ems W+, bl. wpm Y?GmM_ p 0.. W n°mwa p w aenaocm...mw+ N wa.lme'u?+ Ary pwm, w ^'.F9 Y..axeewx M 4 name % ro+u as epvnxm P.<+.w?xa l .M twxxw Cma M ropes, x? •o.+aw ?W bn ? ? _ 'S. ? tp 1°iw m un?w.pp ?.s.'p wV p ..?. r m. w w mM.<.w cpw.p•..I ,M um. d xes? ,O. Ox ?.e.e.a Cxma<m• .vp w mwMw b acm'vN a +.wry .ro+rsY .onm. am •u?x.. r e.nsm - - w Iwn . a:, p...., w w .np:<x.aa. „ npn .ml.m w plw. e.evm., w .aa a+m w ,womo. +?... M w e. acv pmw+ ? is ?i °°"x"xN w o? w pm/p .wrxpp,. bm.. 4 .am m w w.ao. Aw.p 'i , - a (n ? t- a 7 - r v ? o ,]. ra,..ap b .. ww.a. •..w.. p .mm,epp .awn ...,m. wr°.., p u. °.4. y ? ,•. >? 1pm.<.4 Cvgrwo x.N M,m•.•, x xAwP Plan bnxaasy b ° opxa d man (,:) males M1em roue T?• _ ?' Y ]r w ...4. ,A w J+w?• .yaeuh?m w? wb m. bW.<w. Cnww.,p onu< m iurow +wM +Mebton 6snw.s .MC ? ? f.l u U° Y ? ? i0. u n M x w v pu ? an°V? Hn i.tl . y ,uN< Yebn <r/w °nir b< a b 41.«a q LLMp.°w < l ro e°6' av( a l a ? C ? 6 I. Y pwna• n•e.s•s. m m e. Rwwa 4 w xp.x^9 <a?mwew ubw emwxw ? Y part x hx 55 ,e M a.eam< m.nanwa?. xw. w. b axpm. ? w p.;.p. obw m..M oro;.p r+p??m. xem- ? ,0. Ewxp •4 .np 4 rww< w u.u...°h m °amMw 4. pwr:p•. ]O M'?^9 ww. u.n w Ewe.e ^°^'9 w m+b<.w wlppau.. pwi 4 nra.•e pr H Apvpw 'i4+evn' :,. .M wM.aw cwn.,p w b ?ro.•w a w e.bpm°. ,.,.ma..,a p°o.. a.r..a p .o pk a..p,x w^x°me .wmq w axwme°. p mu wl•ui n. w or... e«..e.e .m:. ?Nn, p r e b ?ee.e. q LRRIGATION NOTES , .wm mgpm. M.°,. mp vsx°4 W+ cwr°q m w pwu..a pxuoN w •.w^.y aro e..mima 4 w cma°pu.. 2. Boo m. wr '. A=.-.t mr-". : m we.??omE w+a. .m ??a ? ?•w.? a«uAw?iKi seas . ?° w _ ...? p•4 ?<,n,p, °4 pwM mx,a, m ?w<.wa, ] ,b ?pmYY. apmu<m. ,4., wpp?p. hm pao.pn p. 4..' 4Ym ,... A ,4 Nb..w ..m..a wmx. <p,a.,mn. w b .mxm. ,. as ,.,,aa,.n' PLANT LIST w ??ww?xw,,.,.xpxaxa.paM.,..px cYmw °4n n:.,r c,H 1 Y axux]mu..?.m augnamvsu?.,ousOa?M'rt Raep.N man. y., e.x ?h run J a.oAUxa im<.. imx.wren you sw+n. R] twpp °,Y as»pr..m'er.'r..q.'v..psau?.u lOU..RMt2BOc ? Z o ? 3 w w a ~ FE U ($y 3 q LY Z U 5 of 5 ISSUE DATE. l01406 t. PAUL PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. 0 i - ! N A I 4p Ukibi iAL 3 sw ZI11D ? 2 3S? S w 2 q? S I .- \ 5uJ 2g53 RECEIVED IA ., It PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER NL•. Ed Hooper P.o WX 4268 Clearwater; FL 33758 ST PETERSBURG 26 JUL_ -20 FM 111.1151ilbVAIIII It fill of III III