Loading...
FLD2005-06056F-' L; p) 2005 ; { . Planning Departme ' Clearwater 100 South Myrtle A I Clearwater, Florida 3%? Telephone: 727-562=4567 " Fax: 727-562-4865 ?J SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION l? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 120 -CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials : ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT ao A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: be? 1`CLA! 7.f???X) 1 LLC ?} ?-?? MAILING ADDRESS: P. b ` -60X ?N Tn ?X I tin 2n r U 1 V J ? I (1 PHONE NUMBERk" 11)q/-?, b - FAX NUMBER: l ! qr I PROPERTY OWNER(S): Lck-j'a.? (.-C._c , fno-,- &- ? 1 ti k ?1 ? bU a' ?I (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: n (??'[ (1 r G``J mi l , P MAILING ADDRESS: (-Ps 107 'nI 1i-? . U G 3 u PHONE NUMBER:6 d'q r - ?('! FAX NUMBER: 1?? ( U)?"1 CELL NUMBER: "t' / E-MAIL ADDRESS: ng )?SQ B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT? INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: "i ''` 6 ca -?4 ) nr LEGAL DESCRIPTION: G \ C S-: ( I O'? 6/x ?L "A" (if not listed here, ease note the location of this document in the submittal) 0L4r FI PARCEL NUMBER: - a? ' I? _ (aCI3LI -000 b --bUc;o PARCEL SIZE: V . (,1 ?? ?'I ) - y (acres,,ssquare fleet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): J? l?lQl ?O M I f?I,Q?,CQS IG Q R C (number of dwelling units, hotel rodms or square ootage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): R jUr- H bn A? h( Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Ib? I. (5 Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater C • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANS ? DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTI documents) li J UL 01 2005 l?I AEN;T,RIOHTS (lfC41'',A 2LAN' -:YES: `_ NO • ORIGINAL IOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see age 6) D. 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it i located. _ t r) a `I v / ? S v -er ?Q(? ICY i 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. / 1 ' 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed U () my -?e G? -? ' i l VS c>,U? GL 4. Th roposed development i esigne to minimize traffic c ngestio v u o t ?e 0-5 te5icl n?-i J n ,l , m ? a-v?'I'C ;m aLJ" . 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. ?5 t a Comm ,? a d,a 2 + act-'?gr-h' ? mU ffi darnt n,Do " n:' m4 Moh d. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. U? ?c ?( (? ha-5 ?n 'S) Chi , I /?t? ?^? r.V'e /? 1 1 o t?- R x - t? ?lCe- 0 ??11pJtr feS . 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. ?- ?, ? s)c?e ?' ???? dt?e ? b hp ? ?,? ? ? J?- ?.? ? ?-??, . ?'" LQJ t J Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 0 F 2. The development of the parcel proposed fort reduce the fair market value of abutting p imorovements.) • ULo,20M ORIGINAL J neat . acompcebensiue.! II redevelopment project or residential infill project will not ,,(Include, the existing value,?ffai t site and the proposed value of the site with the C?t`r i. t t o o n 1 4. T eb5useissAornixorlof u e within the comprehensive infTf re redevelopment projb?ar?/mpatible with adjacent land uses. Wl\ S C a, ? 6\), AK J I F an 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not o grry4?ise available in the City f Clearwate l GJN1 )ln 4\\-Q r., +'/. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment proiect will uporade the immediate vicinity of A 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicini y of the parcel proposed for developme t and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Y dF i ^ a ha-1- &-,); a-11 i an I a_c1' 9. Adequate o -street pan(ingan the irm rr iate vicinity adding to ae-1harepa ing ormula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. lk-0 a-oveee-- (&),A ,brdvir oe ??aveL?"? an--,4e ?-?? i? . Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 3. The uses within the comprehensive infll redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. n `k e or d n u.? c r ? "d ) nd s-, 1; ny- l )I\/ GL4ri-C ? 4 r fl " 11,' nn. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity ;of the par el proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Te ?DCwro? ? ??,, ? I -PA kan<-_Q OP 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. • 0 ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invo addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with I City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ltY At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: 1 Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; L Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; L All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (S FWMD a prova is required prior to issuanc o City Buildi rmit)yif applicable IR( W Acknowledgem nt oV, '1 42 - a-Kow M- U f- 44- O's 1 CO f stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall I provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ?/ SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; .2] TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; d PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; /GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ET PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) V i L L SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36"): Lq All dimensions; - North arrow; I Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; 0 I , Location map; r 2000 f Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; J I Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; ---' ' Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; a„ G y ?(;?, f All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ? ORIGINAL l Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; L All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; L Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701}; i Location of all landscape material; T Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. r SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and rKE Floor area r atio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. j Z REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'% X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Rf LANDSCAPE PLAN: t1l All existing and proposed structures; L Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; L Sight visibility triangles; L Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; L Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; L Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; L Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. .a- REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/z X 11) (color rendering if possible); L;r IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater 7 ? cniw Jun-22. 2005 9:36AM RIGIP. 2 ? O NAL 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202:.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are In Issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. )d BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings Including height dimensions, colors and materials; Id REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) i] All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? Ali PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall Include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required), ? Reduced signage proposal (8 X X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. I1 0- K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) PLANNIf-a'; O Include If required by the Trafflc Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed developments • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted In the Comprehensive Plan.+ • Will generate 700 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more,new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that Is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generatlon shall be based on the most recent edition of the institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Tdp General Manual. The Traffic Impact study must be prepared In accordance with a °Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study Is Included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and past-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all Intersections Identified in the Scoping Meeting. ratFrc impact study Is net required. CAUTION IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 5624750, L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property describe , *n this application. r?J Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLASa ?J Swom to and subscribed before me this /? day of A.D. 20_ to me dor by M AtL i A N\ lcaL_o-J A o is personally known has produced as ideritlficatlon. Notary My cor Page 6 of 7 - Flextble Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater p...„.. of .. ;=LL •........ ;?quxx. COMMOM MS8385 ?` ?11rtr?lt(800j -54' hn, 22, 2005 9 : 37AM No. 5181 P. 3 AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: n( 1'Irr.rILL I?-kol?ov-- - nnnn I u( nrt,o (Names of all property owners on deed -- please PRINT full 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 4l S E A-5 T 5 140 2.1; 17(L S:L-16,5 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) -a U o 1 i 10 r{ tJ HoM L 3. That the undersigned (haslhave) appointed and (does/do) appoint: 1 ':i3s'UCz b-"j 1 Et,$Orj , -?-- E%-L'C srn(z?R- as (his/iheir) agent(s) to execute any petiflonS or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives In order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described In this application; S. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tru a BCf. Property Owner Property Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this personally appeared rnPrSLtA N tK-oL c-1 Pr Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission E)TIms: o worms 0D0¢88388 : a4L Expires 2/8/2008 ?A Bonded thru (800)432-425A' irn?nu wwn? « Wa NOtaryAssr n { 3.10anning Depertrrlent AppAbatbn Formsldevelopment revisyMaxibla development appllcatlon residangal hifill 2005 dog 0 J day of / 2' ,ho having een first duiv swom Notary Public . U R i? CITY CIF Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater . a 6 r• Planning Department r n TES < 100 South Myrtle Avenu Clearwater, Florida 337 I), i M Telephone: 727-562-45 AI S ???? u e?..?`"r°rk r?? Fax: 727-562 4865 / PLANNING & DF. © SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION CA t Y Cdr f9 SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans Q SUBMIT APPLICATION FEEL I ZO3 DATE RECEIVED: gECEIVED BY (staff initials): 7L-AS (PAGE #: ONING DISTRICT: ILATMUSE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION ORIGINAL Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4.202.A) APPLICANT NAME: ?L (1 '- k6-, LLC MAILINC PHONE PROPERTY OWNER(S): fa-rk-d a? , ?a ) b v a- Yvon -l R", (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: 1? r-P ? 16 ( a-? rCA..1 ! , 1 . - / f MAILING ADDRESS: rnn0,5l(-( u's n n'1 Ro Aor F( "3(1 (0 ` 1 PHONE NUMBER:"t7`-n - ?`? FAX NUMBER: na 1 <1 I ,=- n CELL NUMBER: ( J ?n E-MAIL ADDRESS: P Il}?Q-r U. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATMION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 0-7 5 c&:-4 JV )J S?1"? nr , I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: c-C C l 6? LID ,. (if not listed here, ease note the location of th's document in the submittal) oa PARCEL NUMBER: 04 - a-1 I5 - I ("cla' I well' -A?'-r-- PARCEL SIZE: () J I-3 ? Qom' ) _ S (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): ??Q n7 I ?, ?r a ?? ?? (number of Idling units, hotel ro ms or square ootage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): I' oduc ki b)l o ?Ie ?Sj::J A -'% ( M_ 1 1 (;.,6 ?l P?'/'}(?'?\ Attach sheets and be specific when Identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g.reduction in required num(bbeer of parking spaces, specific use, etc 2 .) / r6r- ?o u' -?-o I b' -+-3 Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • vur=? I his APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable - documents) .. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) CC ?, P SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see ag e 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) !°° Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it i located . b _ ] ( I 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land dings or significantly impair the value thereof. 4 A (?J ! 10,35 1 ' ac 4n-? 1 _: C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or fety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed u ' , G) 1 Y? hake- e b I yh,kOJ4. A 0-4- -t) dv Pis Ir C5 o? n -?°I^sz ei qh , 4 Th d d l . ropose eve opment i esigne to minimize traffic c ngestior v o ,? 0, ?t"51?i? n l a 1?? I ,m bLt C em a-C-A , 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Thx-proMrs,,co 0, ?s COf) I a C?mm? ;?-- Oaf >(1 1 PX t- ln.Pr V 1 S f 1? L) - f a ?t lY1 t F J ,,r ? j i? ° i 1" an ? c p 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. -rbu Pr 1-1/ ha.-? na l e fla ajieP s2 Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 1 /?.? ty 1-3 GI. !/V t c6i;c11c o SI due 4 fliv r b GJ 1 an ? ORIGINAL J _. l --`' "rc :'. 1 Z4 Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • . ORIGINAL 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the imnrnvamonfe 1 3. The uses within the L 1?-5 Of) A 4T with adjacent land uses. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not o ise avail ble 'n the City V Clearwate 6.. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of t parcel proposed for devel ment.j _ 1?0? 01 ( Q jar b t acl 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity f the parcel proposed for developm t and the City of Clearwater as a whole. lam;' n7 I r lea, a.? nc.i ADM r dF 115 0' az?' &-J 00 r 1 tr, a_CTIA C- 'ol 4-N Adequat Co =strut parking he imm iate vicinity according to flie?harepa Nngmula in Division tof Article 3 will be available to a1v-oiid on-street parking in tthe immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.) r ` 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. U 4133,12 PLAINN: 32 Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infll Application 2005- City of Clearwater Cl i Y `JCS (;; a • • ORIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design C Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH AL C PPLICATIONS. All applications that invo addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must incluf'- •ater plan that demonstrates compliance with 1 City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction face area does not qualify as an exemption this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explan. At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; L Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; AWadjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of ., et control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all cal and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. 7 Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL ?j?h?p?li?requir?prior ?islsuancp0?C?ity Bujldi?q`P?`S?i' ??cable E? Acknowledgem t of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE.HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) a SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; Jd TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; fJ PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; / ?1?1/,Yls C? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; of PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G: SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ( D V SITE PLAN.with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): Fri i - All dimensions; North arrow; Irk L ^ Zli35 I j / Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in -----• -f package; PL/4t1IttIIVr (;j '. t t L Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; I 1 Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; CITY Clf t i 4 =1 i All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; _ Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater • ? ORIGINAL Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; __e__ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201 (D)(1) and Index #701}; i Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; T Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and t Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; 7 Gross floor area devoted to each use; l Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; s Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. O REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8'% X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) lif LANDSCAPE PLAN: yL All existing and proposed structures; L Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; L Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; L Sight visibility triangles; -.L- Delineationand dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plank schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; L Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; L Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; L Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. TU- REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); Qr IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); 9K COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. '' L?J' r I I I Z%sz Page 5of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater r S "Cs J o n, 22. 2006 9: 36AM "o 1. -BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Required In the event the application includes a development where design stagy of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. Jd BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings Including height ?u REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and ma possible) as required. • ? O 5 1ERIG(NAL tlon 4-202:A.23) are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part , colors and materials; to scale (8 % X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if J.' SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) O All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimenslo s (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall Include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). D l!? M. ? Reduced signage proposal (8 X X 11) (color), if submitting comprehensive Sign P ogram application. f 1 K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.0) O include if required by the Trafflc Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the pi • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted In the • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 oi • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportabl on the City s annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transpo The Traftlo Impact Study must be prepared In accordance with a °Scoping Meeting" Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) a PLAt41?A-rj r - '? )posed development: " Comprehensive Plan. more, new vehicle trips per day, accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. with the Traffic Operations Manager and•the Planning Refer to Section 4.801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study Is Included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all Intersections Identified in the Scoping Meeting. ?raftia Impact Study Is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST 13E RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750, L. SIGNATURE: 1. the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my -knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property describ n this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PiNELLAS `ld pc ?? Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of M ?2 ?. ico`o? A .D. 20 o is to me a d/or y by w personally known has produced Gi _ as Identiflcatlon. Notary My cor it n, 22. 2005 9:37AM No. 5181 OR AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT., ?? n?ouw I"? U?YIfLS1.?nr 01-P w,, 6#r Pail kAww e, (_f _e,. (Names of all property owners on deed please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 4-7 S EE +-S T;5 140 Q-Q 'D62 x3'16,5 ?1' 2. That this property constitutes the property. for which a request for a: (describe request) 2 ON IT 1ovt 1`1 torn ? Al I( GINAL -tL.4v??r?1 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint; QTY C C t G ,l rv D-, i CLZptJ 1 -?- E(Z.tc QT-o{z- aS (hishheir) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to Induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site vislts.to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes city representatives'to visit and photograph the property described In this application; 6. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is tfLl a rrect. Property Owner Property Property COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Before me the. undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, on this personally appeared MARta? NtKeDLovPr Depo? ses and says that hs/aha fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she sranwl r My Commission Expires: Expires 2/9/2008 Bonded thru (900)432-4254: Florida Notary Ass, i..« ................a.n.,,n..a day of ho having een fIr"uly sworn 2-- ?J 1VCS 5.,1P10nning Department ApplfW561) FormsWeMopment revF®w&M616 deverapment application res dontial inhu 2005.doc 0 • ORIGINAL APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT For 475 East Shore Drive, Clearwater Beach D. Written Submittal Requirements [Section 3-913. General standards for Level One and Level Two approval conditions]: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed Belleair Harbor Townhomes are located on east side East Shore Drive on Clearwater Beach. The lot is approximately 60' x 137 and totals 8,171 square feet MOL located in the T-Tourist District within the Marina Residential District of Beach by Design. The proposed use of a 2 unit townhome is permitted within these districts. The zoning supports 5 units on this parcel. The lot is trapezoidal in shape. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. All lots on this street are developed. This will be the first redevelopment project on East Shore Drive and will provide a catalyst for redevelopment of the neighboring parcels consistent with current Code requirements. The project has been designed to look like one large residential structure this increasing the adjacent property values. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. This development will be two townhomes, two floors over parking. The prior structure was a 7-unit motel at grade. This development will result in improvements for the health and safety of the neighborhood by reducing traffic, eliminating the need for parking within the right-of-way, eliminating the current need to back vehicles onto East Shore Drive, providing sidewalk adjacent to the property and meeting current Code requirements. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed two units will have nominal impact on traffic, and will be a substantial improvement over the traffic from the prior 7-unit motel. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed development is a two-unit townhome, which is consistent with the neighborhood which is made up of multi-family housing, apartments and small motels. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. By election to develop a two-unit townhome (versus a condominium or hotel/motel), we have chosen a use that will have the least adverse impact of any redevelopment. Visually, we have constructed a townhome that appears to be a large single-family residence from the exterior for the preferred ascetic effect. The height is 1 twgstarieslil i PLANN'114G & Cyr . r _ `?yt;c 0 0 ORIGINAL over parking, which will not impose on the adjacent parcels. Furthermore, being only two residences, the negative impacts on adjacent properties will be nominal. Q'! y C;.` • Comprehensive Inf ill Redevelopment Project Criteria: ORIGINAL 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. [This district has a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet, minimum lot width of 100', minimum front setbacks of 15', rear setback of 20' and side setbacks of 10' for attached dwellings.] Firstly, we are requesting no increases to height, density or uses permitted in the district. The building is only two stories-over parking, with a height of 32.4 feet from base flood elevation. The front setbacks provided from East Shore Drive will be a minimum 20 feet to building, where 15 feet is required. Due to the trapezoidal shape the average setback is 22.9'. Secondly, this is an existing lot of record and is the only one in the neighborhood (on the water, from Papaya Street to Baymont Street) that is less than 100 feet wide, not meeting the minimum lot width requirement. This lot is 60 feet wide, and we are unable to acquire adjacent lots or those to the west of East Shore Drive. Thus, a deviation from the minimum lot width is necessary. A reduction in the minimum lot area from 10,000 s.f. to the existing lot of record area of 8,171 s.f. is necessary. Thirdly, the deviations from side setbacks from 10 feet to 5 feet requested, are minimal as compared to the improvements being made with regard to parking, open space and drainage. This side setback reduction is necessary to provide the two 2 car garages at 18', Two stairwells to the second floor at 5' each and wall/fire wall widths. The prior structure was a small motel constructed in the early 1970s, that took up a substantial portion of the lot with minimal setbacks and open space and provide no drainage. Modern structure and lot development designed to meet Code will be a significant improvement to the Property. The adjacent structure to the south has 0' setback to sidewalk and 6' setback to building. The structure to the north has a 3' setback to paving and 27 to building. Additionally, please note the existing parcel is 60' wide, providing two side setbacks of 10' results in only 40' of buildable width of the property. This is effectively a 33.3% reduction in lot width. The only request for rear setback is to the pool of 10'. The building will meet the required 20' setback at a minimum setback of 22.9', average 25.7. The proposed pool deck will extend to the seawall. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. The current assessed value of the property, per the Pinellas County tax rolls, is $420,800. The applicant estimates that the value of the property after the proposed edev?e o me t A L IS 1 S 201;j PLAN: ASvcC • • ORIGINAL will be no less than $5,000,000. This project will be the catalyst for the neighborhood, and the value of surrounding properties will be increased by the redevelopment project. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. Townhomes are permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The townhome use is compatible with the existing condominiums and motels on the adjacent lands. 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. [This criteria was deleted by Code amendment.] 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. As previously discussed, the site will be improved visually, by superior architectural design incorporating modern building standards, drainage and site improvements, including the removal of off-site and right-of-way parking. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project is a catalyst for the City's vision of the Marina Residential District as set forth in Beach by Design, which until now, has lay dormant. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. T.nt Width As mentioned previously, a reduction of the minimum lot width from 100 feet to the existing lot of record width of 60 feet is necessary due to the substandard lot size. Lot Size FN I MIS I j L+.v3 PLANITNG ? DF=,: t 61"f t .h.LZ??}•r?i ..,. v • ORIGINAL A reduction in the minimum lot area from 10,000 s.f. to the existing lot size of 8,200 s.f. is necessary since we are unable to increase the lot size by acquiring adjacent lots. Again, this will not set a precedent on East Shore Drive, as this is the only substandard lot between Papaya Street and Baymont Street. Side Setbacks The existing parcel is 60 feet wide. Providing two 10 foot side setbacks would leave only 40 feet of buildable width for the parcel. This is effectively a 33.3% reduction of the parcel and a significant impact. The requested north and south side setbacks are necessary for the sufficient parking beneath the building for two two-car garages and stairwells. The side setbacks requested are 5.1 feet to building and 7 feet to driveway, and the proposed building width is 49 feet, 4 inches. This width is necessary to provide a two-car garage for each town home, which are 18 feet wide each (and with wall widths and two 4 foot stairwells). This side-by-side parking provides six parking spaces for each townhome, twice as many as the three spaces required by Code. This will alleviate the perpetual issue of the Code's minimum parking requirements not providing sufficient parking for guests and the proverbial Super Bowl party. The previous motel had setbacks less than requested. o Regarding the immediate vicinity of the parcel, the adjacent properties have 6 foot setbacks to their structures, with a 0 foot setback to sidewalk on the south and a 3 feet setback to paving on the north. Due to the minimal lot width, it is necessary that the landscape plantings be located within the ponds, as shown on the site plan. Proposed retention areas will be located within the provided 5.1 foot side setback along with intensive landscaping. Rear Setback The requested rear setback is 22.9 feet to building, nearly three feet less than the minimum rear setback of 20 feet. The rear setback to the pool is 10.2 feet. The pool deck is a proposed brick paver deck extending to the seawall, and provides appropriate open space for the waterside of the lot. This will permit nice site lines for neighboring parcels, and not clutter their water view. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. As shown on the proposed site plan, the project provides excess parking. As discussed in #8, the off-street parking will be 2-times that required by Code. -J 1 11 ? qqqi+ ?? ; : r ;CS • • ORIGINAL 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). This plan as designed adequately meets the intent of the City of Clearwater Land Development Regulations and provides the highest and best use, with no ill effects on surrounding properties, of an otherwise sub-standard lot which exists within the City. The proposed project has been designed in accordance with Beach by Design design guidelines. P R AU-J"t ! K".5 PUMING & DE`Jc't - CITY C?c C. LOCATION MAP ,r 05 02:39p Robert Barkley This Instrunjent prepared by (anti should he returned to): Robert D.13arcley, Esquire 38,39 4`u Street North, Suite 570 5t. Petersburg, Florida 33701 1'mvel No., 08/29/15/16414/)03/0050 727.-823-3423 0 KAM-My FP"VELL AS • CO E')TAKER CLt: ?NSr# ?X77 1/WYFLO ' DA RK OF COURT OFT: REc $K. y3 09/f*? ?? 1Q•,g A doC7Ype:pEEC ?• $3319,73 Al Doc STAMP: 6405 oo ?' $70.00 p.2 V ?i r 1 WARRANTYDEED (S(alidory Form--.Scelion 689,02, V,S,) THIS INDENTURE made September 15, 2004, by Rocco A. Rrio and .Donna L. Rao, husband and wife (thc "t;irantut whose pt+st uf(icc address iw 1470 C'hukar Ridge, M11111 11-11•bor, Florida 34ONI- 6456, and 1'arkdale, LI.C, a Florida liniitcd liability Company (Il)c "Grantee"). whose past ofticc address is 6141 Mears Court, Clearwater, Florida 33760. WITNE'SSE"I'll: That crautur, for and in c0nsidcrati0n oftlle suns of' Tell Dollars ($10.00);111d other valw1ble; consideraiti011, to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whel'cof;3114 sufPcicncy of which is hcreby Icknowledged, has gran(ed, baggaincd a,md %old to Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns lbrevcr, tllc Hollowing deseiibed land, lo-wit: i ell S. Mock "C"", Ol' the Itcplal of Block "A" and Lots I to 15, inclusive, Black "B" o1' C l,li'ARWA'IIA BEACH PARK leMST ADDIT1UN, necording to) tllc tll;lt tiicr co, i rccclydcYl in Plat Book 21, page 21, Public Records of Pinellas County, Flodda, together with the submurged land adjacent thereto on the N'asl al'Said l,at 5, whiC11 1;1114 iS b0u1ldcd all the Wea by the Eastern boundary line ofsaid belt 5, and oil the &ist by the Westem boundary ol'the clwnricl ill C'Icarwatcr Bay, lying East of said Lot S, oil dic Norili by an extension Easterly of tho Norlhcrn houndauy line of salid iA 5, 108,11d c111,11111c1 11cn111(hlry line ,1116 an tha SOU111 I1y an extension Easterly of the South boundary line ol'sakl E,Ot S, to the said chalincl boundary line, together with any and all riparian rights apper111illing d1crclo. Together with all the tenenients, hereditallwilts and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise nppcrtliining, iv have clad to hold the samc in fec simple tbrcvcr, subject to easeirients, re-slrictiolls and resorvations alit ovd,;11141 subject (o (axes 1m, tlic year 2004;utd xubsequol)l ye.lrs. And Grantor dovs, hcreby !idly warrant the title 10 said laud, and will defcnd (hc same against file lawful clainis ol'all persons whom.,ucver. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Grantor has set 11;1 hand and seal, the date first written above. Signed, sealcd,)lid dclivel-W irr the prcncnee al': N;11+1c: pBER'T D. )BARCLEY Name: 4Pp"kv'_V_ GA6W-0 j SPATE OF FLORIDA C'OUNT'Y Ole PINieLLAS 1?r /f CSQ., I) Rocco A. lino -(Seal) The fcn•egailig insIM111cnt was acknowledged before 1ne olis Septclilbc:r 15, 2004, by Rocco A. R20 ,)nd 1)0111ea I„ lZ110, wllcl arC persallally known to nic or wilo pr0(Iuecd 141,101-wo I)rivers Licuatscs or I. 1 _ •._.._ as idcntiliration. Robert D. Bartley 't Commission # D0330314 Expims Jerre 26, 2008 ... e«a.e Teywln • M.w.n... r,? ?oo?eivlo (NOTARY Mi.. 1.6. ,.„ 77-t Number. My conilliission expire-': Natat• le erial Mau, '26 65 04:33p Rob. ?_r Baroley 727-P 3-3423 p.2 FUND OWNER 'S FORM ORIGINAL Schedule A Policy No.: OPM-2619833 Effective Data September 20, 2004 at 10:45 A.M. Amount of insurance: $925,000.00 1. Name of Insured: Parkdale, I LC, a Florida, limited liability company Agent's File Reference: Dolphin 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is a fee simple (if other, specify same) and is at the effective date hereof vested in the named insured as shown by instrument recorded in Official Records Book 13fi:?t?. page 93't, of the Public Records of PineiWs County, Florida. 3. . The land referyred to in this policy is described as follows: Lot 5 Block "C", of the Replat of Block "A'' and Lots I to l5. inclusive, Block "B" of CLEARW.4TL'R BEACH PARK FIRST ADDITION, according to the plat thereof recorded in PIat Book 21, page 21, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with the submerged land adjacent thereto on the &st of said Lot 5, which land is bounded on the West by the Easiem boundaty line of said Lot S. and on the East by the Western boundary of the channel in Clearwater Bay, lying East of said Len 5, on the North by an extenision Easterly of the Northern boundary line of said Lot 5, to said channel boundary line and on the South by an extension Easterly of the South boundary line of said Lot 5, to the said channel boundary litre. together with any and all riparian rights appertaining; thereto, ISSUING AGENT • ATTORNEY OR MILM OF ATTORNEYS ?8 Q 4tlt Street- North, Suite 57() ...,._._.....---.-. MAILING ADDR8S - 1SR54 AGENT NO. 4C;ENT' SIGI:ATUPw- Robert D. Bartley _St_Pctc?rxl?ur;; L Florida 137()3, CITY ?ii FUND Form OPM-SCH. A (Rcv- 1!9X) (486J PU%, nMay"26 Q5 04:33p Robert.Harole8 727_-823-3423 p.3 FUND 0 WNER'S F ORM ORIGINAL Schedule 8 Policy No., OPlvl-2419833 Ms policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: 1. Taxes for the year of the effective date of this policy and taxes or special assessments which are not shown as emstir,- liens by the public records 2. Possible fence encroachment on North boundary, asphalt parking encroachment onto right-of-way on West side of property, seawall and dock encroachments on West side of property and other matters of survey shown on the survey prepared by L.R. Penny &: Associates, Inc. adated September 10, 2004. bearing Job # 04-1113. 3. Any adverse ownership claim by the State of Florida, or the United States, by right of Sovereignty to any portion of the lands insured hereunder, .including submerged, tilled and artificially exposed lands, and lands accreted to such lands, 4.; Restrictions, condition. reservations, casements and other matters contained on the plat of CLEARWATER 13EAC14 PARK FIRST ADDIT ON, as recorded in Plat Book 21, page 21, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 5. Those portions of the property herein described comprising artificially filled land in what was formerly navigable waters, arc subject to any and all riEOits of the United States govemnnent's control over navigablo waters in the intomt 4f navigation and commerce. f. Riparian; and littoral rights, rights of rcliction and accretion, and any other water rights whatsoever r>ertaining or related to the subject property arc not insured. 7. Tine rifts, if any, of the public to use as public beach or recreation area any part of the land lying between the body of water abutting the subject property and the seawall separating the publicly used axci from the upland private area, or such upland private area as it may have existed prior to the construction of the sc-.owall or bulkhead thereon, 8. Subject to any and all. residual royalty rights of Coastal Petroleum Company, or its assicns, resulting from any agreements with the Trustees of the internal Tmprovernent Trust Futnd of Florida, which docs not include the right of entry for exploration, mining, or drilling. :91 Basernent in favor of City of Clearwater recorded in O.R. Book 12047, page 1791, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida 10..Subjeci to any lion provided by Chapter 159, Florida Statutes, in favor of any city, townsliip or port authority for unpaid service charges for service of any water system, sewer system or gas system serving lands described herein. 11. Mortgage in favor of Colonial Bank, N.A. in the amount of $093,750.00, dated Sclntcrnbcr 15, 2()04, recorded in U.R. Book 13836, page 934, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PLAt.. rUNU FQ1M1 UI'M-UGII, B (rcv, 31I4) t460J -?aoaS ooo? ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"' FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME Q t K of QV, ena a?y,'5 k o-4 ADDRESS Mal- S c fea ? ?F(-- 3 ? 76O PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER APPLICANT'S NAME ?e t10-C,"r 1"Ot , CL(- , - ADDRESS pe, ?j ,?-, N .Ln&,n o [*cj,S t^ 332 gS PHONE NUMBER 20 - J jb Ly 7 27 L1 FAX NUMBER 7 2 7 P? AGENT NAME ( 2 ADDRESS 56 L/ V S P? D PHONE NUMBER 7 7i 9 75 ? (-16 FAX NUMBER : $ 7 33 Ll? I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS representations made in this application Sworn to and subscribed before me this daY of are true and accurate to the best of my Ste, ?e A.D., 19Cjbto me and/or knowledge. C90 by?x,z \Cr?Srnr?r, who is personally known to vxtq Signature of owner or representative me or as produced as id ification tary Public my commission expires: Fourteen (14) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; Page l "? 4wz SARAH WOOL.FORD MY COMMISSION # DD 297195 EXPIRES: March 8, 2008 ' Pf r+ S=W Ttw NoUq PWAIC Urde MIM FF, 0 ?i1 ,! r I, J UL 01 2005 PLANNING & op " •? QTY QF c--'f: 0 • ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT STREETS RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY. Page 2 A101 2005 0 • ORIGINAL SEAI+?? ? y ???Ir s 99?'ATEA??? CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"a FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL OF FINAL PLAT INSTRUCTIONS The final plat shall be suitable for recording at the office of the clerk of the circuit court. It shall be prepared and sealed buy a land surveyor registered by the state and shall conform with the requirements of Florida Statute, Chapter 177, and the requirements of this subsection. It shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals 50 feet or other scale determined appropriate by the city engineer. The overall sheet size of the plat shall be consistent with the standards established by the clerk of the circuit court for recording. Each sheet shall be provided with a one-inch margin on each of three sides and a three-inch margin on the left side of the plat for binding purposes. Eighteen (18) copies of the Final Plat must be submitted. ALL FINAL PLATS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: NAME OF PLAT; LOCATION OF THE PLAT BY U.S. SURVEY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE, COUNTY AND STATE; NAMES OF EXISTING STREETS ABUTTING RO GIVING ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT; ALL PLAT BOUNDARIES BASED ON AN ACCURATE TRANSVERSE, WITH ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS SHOWN. ERROR OF ENCLOSURE OF SUCH BOUNDARY SURVEY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT FOR EACH 10,000 FEET OF PERIMETER SURVEY; ALL BLOCKS, LOTS, STREETS, CROSSWALKS, EASEMENTS AND WATERWAYS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PLAT, ALL OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS GIVEN AND ALL RADII, INTERNAL ANGLES, BEARINGS, POINTS OF CURVATURE, TANGENTS AND LENGTHS OF ALL CURVES, SO THAT NO DIMENSIONS OR DATA ARE MISSING WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF ANY OF THE CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES OF BLOCKS, LOTS OR STREETS, AS LISTED ABOVE. WHEN ANY LOT OR PORTION OF THE PLAT IS BOUNDED BY AN IRREGULAR LINE, THE MAJOR PORTION OF THAT LOT OR PLAT SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A WITNESS LINE SHOWING COMPLETE DATA, WITH DISTANCES ALONG SUCH LINES EXTENDED BEYOND THE ENCLOSURE TO THE IRREGULAR BOUNDARY SHOWN WITH AS MUCH CERTAINTY AS CAN BE DETERMINED OR AS "MORE OR LESS", IF VARIABLE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT. TRUE ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHALL BE DRAWN TO THE NEAREST ESTABLISHED OFFICIAL MONUMENTS, NOT LESS THAN THREE OF WHICH SHALL BE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT. THE INTENDED USE OF ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED. CURVILINEAR LOTS SHALL SHOW ARC DISTANCES, AND RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING. RADIAL LINES SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED. DIRECTION OF NONRADIAL LINES SHALL BE INDICATED; SUFFICIENT ANGLES AND BEARINGS SHALL IDENTIFY THE DIRECTION OF ALL LINES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO THE NEAREST SECOND; p L? leaLt11V' L JU 01 2005 1 Page 3 C4TY MK 4 L4_ m ,. ,_...: , 0 • ORIGINAL ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINES SHALL BE SHOWN WITH DISTANCES, ANGLES, BEARINGS OR AZIMUTH, POINTS OF CURVATURE, POINTS OF TANGENCY, POINTS OF REVERSE CURVATURE, POINTS OF COMPOUND CURVATURE, ARC DISTANCE, CENTRAL ANGLES, TANGENTS, RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING OR AZIMUTH, OR BOTH ALL EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES OR UTILITIES, AND ANY LIMITATIONS OF SUCH EASEMENTS; ALL LOT NUMBERS AND LINES. LOT LINES SHALL BE MARKED WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS OF FEET, AND BEARINGS OR ANGLES TO STREET LINES; ACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY AREA TO BE DEDICATED OR RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE WITH THE PURPOSE INDICATED THEREON; TITLE, DATE OF SURVEY, GRAPHIC SCALE OF MAP AND NORTH ARROW. THE BEARING OR AZIMUTH REFERENCE SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT IN THE NOTES OR LEGEND; PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE SATE OF FLORIDA; EACH PLAT SHALL SHOW A DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS PLATTED, AND THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE THE SAME IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATION. THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE SO COMPLETE THAT FROM IT, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE PLAT, THE STARTING POINT AND BOUNDARY CAN BE DETERMINED; THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND THE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SEAL; ALL SECTION LINES AND QUARTER SECTION LINES OCCURRING IN THE MAP OR PLAT SHALL BE INDICATED BY LINES DRAWN UPON THE MAP OR PLAT, WITH APPROPRIATE WORDS AND FIGURES. IF THE DESCRIPTION IS BY METES AND BOUNDS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING SHALL BE INDICATED, TOGETHER WITH ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES OF THE BOUNDARY LINES. IF THE PLATTED LANDS ARE IN A LAND GRANT OR ARE NOT INCLUDED IN 1HE SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT SURVEYS, THEN THE BOUNDARIES ARE TO BE DEFINED BY METES AND BOUNDS AND COURSES. THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE TIED TO THE NEAREST GOVERNMENT CORNER OF OTHER RECORDED AND WELL-ESTABLISHED CORNER; ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAT TITLE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE OR, IF UNPLATTED, LAND SHALL BE SO DESIGNED. IF THE AREA PLATTED IS A REPLATTING OF A PART OR THE WHOLE OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT, SUFFICIENT TIES SHALL BE SHOWN TO CONTROLLING LINES APPEARING ON THE EARLIER PLAT TO PERMIT AN OVERLAY TO BE MADE AND REFERENCE TO THE REPLATTING SHALL BE STATED AS A SUBTITLE FOLLOWING THE NAME OF THE PLAT WHEREVER IT APPEARS ON THE PLAT; ALL LOTS SHALL BE NUMBERED EITHER BY PROGRESSIVE NUMBERS OR, IF IN BLOCKS, PROGRESSIVELY NUMBERED OR LETTERED IN EACH BLOCK, EXCEPT THAT BLOCKS IN NUMBER ADDITIONS BEARING THE SAME NAME MAY BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY THROUGHOUT THE SEVERAL ADDITIONS; PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PARCELS SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED; ALL INTERIOR EXCEPTED PARCELS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND LABELED "NOT A PART OF THIS PLAT"; THE PURPOSE OF ALL AREAS DEDICATED MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED OR STATED ON THE PLAT; WHEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SHOW CURVE DETAIL INFORMATION ON THE MAP, A BE USED. lLN : THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL PLAT: A TITLE OPINION OF AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE SATE OR A CERTIFICATION BY AN ABSTRACTOR OR A TITLE COMPANY STATING THAT THE COURT RECORDS IDENTIFY THAT THE 11TLE TO THE LAND AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAT IS IN THE NAME OF THE PERSON EXECUTING THE DEDICATION. IN ADDITION, A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CONSENT TO PLATTING OF LANDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE SHALL BE FILED TOGETHER WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR EACH PERSON OR CORPORATION Page h 1? • • ORIGINAL HOLDING A MORTGAGE ON ALL LAND INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, WHERE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT SIGNED THE FINAL PLAT. THE TITLE OPINION OR CERTIFICATION SHALL SHOW ALL MORTGAGES NOT SATISFIED OR RELEASED OF RECORD NOR OTHER WISE TERMINATED BY LAW; CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THAT THE PLAT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT ALL THE NECESSARY SURVEY MONUMENTS, LOT SIZES AND LOT DIMENSIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN THEREON, AND THAT THE PLAT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 AND THIS DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPRESSED ON THE PLAT AND AFFIXED THERETO SHALL BE THE PERSONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE TO THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR INCLUDING THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE SURVEYOR, BY WHOM OR UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION THE PLAT WAS PREPARED; A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PLATTED LANDS. HOWEVER, A NEW BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR A REPEAT IS REQUIRED ONLY WHEN THE REPEAT AFFECTS ANY BOUNDARY OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED PROPERTY OR WHEN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE LANDS TO BE REPLATTED OR ADJOINING LANDS. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED AND PREPARED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PRECEDING THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PLAT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT RESTRICT A LEGAL ENTITY FROM EMPLOYING ONE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PERFORM AND PREPARE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PREPARE THE PLAT, EXCEPT THAT BOTH THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND THE PLAT MUST BE UNDER THE SAME LEGAL ENTITY; CERTIFICATION THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID; EVERY PLAT OF A SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM FILED FOR RECORD SHALL INCLUDE ANY REQUIRED DEDICATION BY THE APPLICANT. THE DEDICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY ALL OWNERS HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND BEING PLATTED, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED. ALL MORTGAGEES HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND PLATTED SHALL EXECUTE, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED, EITHER THE DEDICATION CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OR IN A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT JOINING THE RATIFICATION OF THE PLAT AND ALL DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS THEREON IN THE FORM OF A CONSENT TO PLAT FROM ALL MORTGAGE INTERESTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEN A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND HAS BEEN PLATTED AND A PLAT THEREOF BEARING THE DEDICATION EXECUTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY HAS BEEN SECURED AND RECORDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DIVISION, ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS- OF-WAY AND PUBLIC AREAS SHOWN ON SUCH PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE BEEN DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREON, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SEPARATE ACTION BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION TO FORMALLY ACCEPT SUCH OFFERS OF DEDICATION; ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRIVATE RESTRICTION AND TRUSTEESHIPS AND THEIR PERIODS OF EXISTENCE SHALL BE FILED AS A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REFERENCE TO SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL BE NOTED ON THE FINAL PLAT; "?"`' ?' ?' .a ..?.? ,?? t? 0 9 2005 PLANNI???, •g r , ....... __.... QITY c, .............. .. AFTER A FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED, THREE PRINTS OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE BEE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE SUCH PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE: UNLESS ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED, AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY EVERY PLAT WHICH IS TO BE RECORDED TO ENSURE THE ACTUAL SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN NOT MORE THAN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE RECORDING, OR ONE YEAR IF SIDEWALKS ARE THE ONLY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING THE DATE OF RECORDING. AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY Pale 5 ENGINEER, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED IF THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES IT APPROPRIATE AND MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME IN PROPORTION TO THE WORK COMPLETED, AND MAY TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY; CASH, TO BE HELD IN A SEPARATE ESCROW ACCOUNT BY THE CITY; OR AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT WRITTEN BY A BANK CHARTERED BY THE SATE, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE UNITED STATES IF THE BANK IS AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER THINGS, AN EXPIRATION DATE NOT EARLIER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE; A PROVISION REQUIRING THE ISSUER OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT TO GIVE AT LEAST 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OR RENEWAL OF THE LETTER; AND A PROVISION THAT THE LETTER IS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQUALING ITS ORIGINAL TERM OF THE REQUIRED NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN; OR A SURETY BOND ISSUED BY A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE. THE SURETY BOND SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE PROVISION REQUIRED FOR LETTERS OF CREDIT. ri-I PLAN' Page 6 LL ? o 11 U Planning and Development Services 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4576 O SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION 0 SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan OkE #- D RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff Initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: / SOUTH: WEST• / EAST:. / ORIGINAL COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Revised 9/19/2001) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001) APPLICANT NAME: G-Ir MAILING ADDRESS: J? ' J?/? Sj 1 Z? t a ?/ VV c,'/-5 3aC`C'?, PHONE NUMBER: W'? - #120 - s-&6 FAX NUMBER: ! o-ri B ci t?t M?v1s PROPERTY OWNER(S): Po'r-k", wc. ` H't/ I C" k) 1 t? O ?'CJ k - U (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) 1'r eA r P- s /ki-(, vi MAILING ADDRESS: ?mo l vs <f A)or A , 4-1 M &rl??, r L 3 C-16 9 e-r PHONE NUMBER: 72.7 ?16? - e-16S L? FAX NUMBER: -22-1) 7&1 -3395- The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sectionslelevations, renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information provided on this worksheet: 1. Architectural Theme. a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development The Landscape is in concert with the local development maximizing Landscape treatment and enhancing architectural themes. i. ? r OR r b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The Landscape treatment has been maximized on the property without jeopardizing drainage patterns, underground or overhead utilities, and the function of the building. .?A F) i Q I N.1 A I 1 I l_.i' Y? f 2. Lighting- Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed. Lighting will be controlled to be respectful of neighboring properties. 3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Landscape treatment is designed to give years of benefits without the disruption of building function, drainage and utilities. PLANNING CAT Y `n Page 2 of 3 Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in. the Comprehensive Landscape Program wM have a beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development_ The Landscape treatment will benefit value by providing aesthetically pleasing views while providing climate control for building and parking areas. 5. Special Area or Scenic Condor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located. Please return checidist for review and verification. 6. That tUWgN the wW"sIgnW wfiwnty. hmby m W that the foregoft is in,e cair+ect Prey Einrc?r I . AA, G/s 2 fos STATE f3I' FLf JAS $KuGE DAIJIE?.gosa 3ooF Page 3 of 3 -who i?vrrg been ftrst`thdy swam U rn? D Ally 1 ? ?a.?? ? ' % `! PLltlNN a 8 ;lI ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME Par k1 alle f LC , A `CLr1 o- . U t lG p oV ¢. p ADDRESS ?? ?? I '? `S l (, r+? IP [t t - 3 76? PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME j[C {L?yf ????Df , CLL , ADDRESS s-1 14 Vr)Q,LU., e6(y S J7?AG?? rC 33 2 83 PHONE NUMBER 5j,&q FAX NUMBER ?74 7 AGENT NAME d )t GT ?! A,Sr+'s4 +i ? ADDRESS ?l J-6 L/ V J /4 ®r "1 PHONE NUMBER ? Z7 75? L16 s L( FAX NUMBER 7,r1 331-45- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS representations made in this application Sworn to and subscribed before me this-5alday of are true and accurate to the best of my Su ?e A.D., 76CIbto me and/or knowledge. ?b by?a •rj who is personally known to Signature of owner or representative me or as produced as id ification tary Public my commission expires: Fourteen (14) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted. The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT, IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; Page 1 "•, • SARAH WOOLFORD MYCOMM{SSION4.D113297195 EXPIRES March 8, 2008 '???? • eonaed•nvuwaa?yl?u?cuneen+?wre '?" I ,err I PLANNIN G& DE' „ QTY 0F C-1 T ?r DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT STREETS RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY. ORIGINAL PLANNING & DEVELC)i?;., : i t SVCS Pale 2 • • ORIGINAL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 1OUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2- FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL OF FINAL PLAT INSTRUCTIONS The final plat shall be suitable for recording at the office of the clerk of the circuit court. It shall be prepared and sealed buy a land surveyor registered by the state and shall conform with the requirements of Florida Statute, Chapter 177, and the requirements of this subsection. It shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals 50 feet or other scale determined appropriate by the city engineer. The overall sheet size of the plat shall be consistent with the standards established by the clerk of the circuit court for recording. Each sheet shall be provided with a one-inch margin on each of three sides and a three-inch margin on the left side of the plat for binding purposes. Eighteen (18) copies of the Final Plat must be submitted. ALL FINAL PLATS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: NAME OF PLAT; LOCATION OF THE PLAT BY U.S. SURVEY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE, COUNTY AND STATE; NAMES OF EXISTING STREETS ABUTTING RO GIVING ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT; ALL PLAT BOUNDARIES BASED ON AN ACCURATE TRANSVERSE, WITH ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS SHOWN. ERROR OF ENCLOSURE OF SUCH BOUNDARY SURVEY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT FOR EACH 10,000 FEET OF PERIMETER SURVEY; ALL BLOCKS, LOTS, STREETS, CROSSWALKS, EASEMENTS AND WATERWAYS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PLAT, ALL OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS GIVEN AND ALL RADII, INTERNAL ANGLES, BEARINGS, POINTS OF CURVATURE, TANGENTS AND LENGTHS OF ALL CURVES, SO THAT NO DIMENSIONS OR DATA ARE MISSING WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF ANY OF THE CORNERS _OR BOUNDARIES OF BLOCKS, LOTS OR STREETS, AS LISTED ABOVE. WHEN ANY LOT OR PORTION OF THE PLAT IS BOUNDED. BY AN IRREGULAR LINE, THE MAJOR PORTION OF THAT LOT OR PLAT SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A WITNESS LINE SHOWING COMPLETE DATA, WITH DISTANCES ALONG SUCH LINES EXTENDED BEYOND THE ENCLOSURE TO THE IRREGULAR BOUNDARY SHOWN WITH AS MUCH 0ERTAINTY AS CAN BE DETERMINED OR AS "MORE OR LESS", IF VARIABLE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT. TRUE ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHALL BE DRAWN TO THE NEAREST ESTABLISHED OFFICIAL MONUMENTS, NOT LESS THAN THREE OF WHICH SHALL BE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED _. -- -ON THE PLAT. THE INTENDED USE OF ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE-CLEARLY. STATED.----- CURVILINEAR LOTS SHALL SHOW ARC DISTANCES, AND RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING. RADIAL LINES SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED. DIRECTION OF NONRADIAL LINES SHALL BE INDICATED; SUFFICIENT ANGLES AND BEARINGS SHALL IDENTIFY THE DIRECTION OF ALL LINES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO THE NEAREST SECOND; Page 3 ' IA A A!?w? 7 1. 1 I PLACJP?.Ivr C?lTY c • • ORIGINAL ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINES SHALL BE SHOWN WITH DISTANCES, ANGLES, BEARINGS OR AZIMUTH, POINTS OF CURVATURE, POINTS OF TANGENCY, POINTS OF REVERSE CURVATURE, POINTS OF COMPOUND CURVATURE, ARC DISTANCE, CENTRAL ANGLES, TANGENTS, RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING OR AZIMUTH, OR BOTH ALL EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES OR UTILITIES, AND ANY LIMITATIONS OF SUCH EASEMENTS; ALL LOT NUMBERS AND LINES. LOT LINES SHALL BE MARKED WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS OF FEET, AND BEARINGS OR ANGLES TO STREET LINES; ACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY AREA TO BE DEDICATED OR RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE WITH THE PURPOSE INDICATED THEREON; TITLE, DATE OF SURVEY, GRAPHIC SCALE OF MAP AND NORTH ARROW. THE BEARING OR AZIMUTH REFERENCE SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT IN THE NOTES OR LEGEND; PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE SATE OF FLORIDA; EACH PLAT SHALL SHOW A DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS PLATTED, AND THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE THE SAME IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATION. THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE SO COMPLETE THAT FROM IT, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE PLAT, THE STARTING POINT AND BOUNDARY CAN BE DETERMINED; THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND THE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SEAL; ALL SECTION LINES AND QUARTER SECTION LINES OCCURRING IN THE MAP OR PLAT SHALL BE INDICATED BY LINES DRAWN UPON THE MAP OR PLAT, WITH APPROPRIATE WORDS AND FIGURES. IF THE DESCRIPTION IS BY METES AND BOUNDS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING SHALL BE INDICATED, TOGETHER WITH ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES OF THE BOUNDARY LINES. IF THE PLATTED LANDS ARE IN A LAND GRANT OR ARE NOT INCLUDED IN lHE SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT SURVEYS, THEN THE BOUNDARIES ARE TO BE DEFINED BY METES AND BOUNDS AND COURSES. THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE TIED TO THE NEAREST GOVERNMENT CORNER OF OTHER RECORDED AND WELL-ESTABLISHED CORNER; ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAT TITLE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE OR, IF UNPLATTED, LAND SHALL BE SO DESIGNED. IF THE AREA PLATTED IS A REPLATTING OF A PART OR THE WHOLE OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT, SUFFICIENT TIES SHALL BE SHOWN TO CONTROLLING LINES APPEARING ON THE EARLIER PLAT TO PERMIT AN OVERLAY TO BE MADE AND REFERENCE TO THE REPLATTING SHALL BE STATED AS A SUBTITLE FOLLOWING THE NAME OF THE PLAT WHEREVER IT APPEARS ON THE PLAT; ALL LOTS SHALL BE NUMBERED EITHER BY PROGRESSIVE NUMBERS OR, IF IN BLOCKS, PROGRESSIVELY NUMBERED OR LETTERED IN EACH BLOCK, EXCEPT THAT BLOCKS IN NUMBER ADDITIONS BEARING THE SAME NAME MAY BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY THROUGHOUT THE SEVERAL ADDITIONS; PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PARCELS SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED; ALL INTERIOR EXCEPTED PARCELS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND LABELED "NOT A PART OF THIS PLAT"; THE PURPOSE OF ALL AREAS DEDICATED MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED OR STATED ON THE PLAT; WHEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SHOW CURVE DETAIL INFORMATION ON THE MAP, A TABULAR FORM -MAY BE USED.. { I, iL' PLANN:Nt,3 & DE',fPtC?l? THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL PLAT: A TITLE OPINION OF AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE SATE OR A CERTIFICATION BY AN ABSTRACTOR OR A TITLE COMPANY STATING THAT THE COURT RECORDS IDENTIFY THAT THE TITLE TO THE LAND AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAT IS IN THE NAME OF THE PERSON EXECUTING THE DEDICATION. IN ADDITION, A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CONSENT TO PLATTING OF LANDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE SHALL BE FILED TOGETHER WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR EACH PERSON OR CORPORATION Page 4 ? *ORIGINAL HOLDING A MORTGAGE ON ALL LAND INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, WHERE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT SIGNED THE FINAL PLAT. THE TITLE OPINION OR CERTIFICATION SHALL SHOW ALL MORTGAGES NOT SATISFIED OR RELEASED OF RECORD NOR OTHER WISE TERMINATED BY LAW; CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THAT THE PLAT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT ALL THE NECESSARY SURVEY MONUMENTS, LOT SIZES AND LOT DIMENSIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN THEREON, AND THAT THE PLAT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 AND THIS DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPRESSED ON THE PLAT AND AFFIXED THERETO SHALL BE THE PERSONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE TO THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR INCLUDING THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE SURVEYOR, BY WHOM OR UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION THE PLAT WAS PREPARED; A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PLATTED LANDS. HOWEVER, A NEW BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR A REPLAT IS REQUIRED ONLY WHEN THE REPLAT AFFECTS ANY BOUNDARY OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED PROPERTY OR WHEN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE LANDS TO BE REPLATTED OR ADJOINING LANDS. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED AND PREPARED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PRECEDING THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PLAT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT RESTRICT A LEGAL ENTITY FROM EMPLOYING ONE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PERFORM AND PREPARE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PREPARE THE PLAT, EXCEPT THAT BOTH THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND THE PLAT MUST BE UNDER THE SAME LEGAL ENTITY; CERTIFICATION THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID; EVERY PLAT OF A SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM FILED FOR RECORD SHALL INCLUDE ANY REQUIRED DEDICATION BY THE APPLICANT. THE DEDICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY ALL OWNERS HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND BEING PLATTED, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED. ALL MORTGAGEES HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND PLATTED SHALL EXECUTE, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED, EITHER THE DEDICATION CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OR IN A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT JOINING THE RATIFICATION OF THE PLAT AND ALL DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS THEREON IN THE FORM OF A CONSENT TO PLAT FROM ALL MORTGAGE INTERESTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEN A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND HAS BEEN PLATTED AND A PLAT THEREOF BEARING THE DEDICATION EXECUTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY HAS BEEN SECURED AND RECORDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DIVISION, ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS- OF-WAY AND PUBLIC AREAS SHOWN ON SUCH PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE BEEN DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREON, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SEPARATE ACTION BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION TO FORMALLY ACCEPT SUCH OFFERS OF DEDICATION; ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRIVATE RESTRICTION AND TRUSTEESHIPS AND THEIR PERIODS OF EXISTENCE SHALL BE FILED AS A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REFERENCE TO SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL- BE.-NOTED, ON, THE FINAL PLAT; D f`' I' ' I PLANt,""NG u o AFTER A FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED, THREE PRINTS OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE BEE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE SUCH PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE: UNLESS ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED, AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY EVERY PLAT WHICH IS TO BE. RECORDED TO ENSURE THE ACTUAL SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN NOT MORE THAN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE RECORDING, OR ONE YEAR IF SIDEWALKS ARE THE ONLY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING THE DATE OF RECORDING. AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY Page 5 s • 'ORIGINAL ENGINEER, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED IF THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES IT APPROPRIATE AND MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME IN PROPORTION TO THE WORK COMPLETED, AND MAY TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY,- CASH, TO BE HELD IN A SEPARATE ESCROW ACCOUNT BY THE CITY; OR AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT WRITTEN BY A BANK CHARTERED BY THE SATE, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE UNITED STATES IF THE BANK IS AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER THINGS, AN EXPIRATION DATE NOT EARLIER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE; A PROVISION REQUIRING THE ISSUER OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT TO GIVE AT LEAST 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OR RENEWAL OF THE LETTER; AND A PROVISION THAT THE LETTER IS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQUALING ITS ORIGINAL TERM OF THE REQUIRED NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN; OR A SURETY BOND ISSUED BY A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE. THE SURETY BOND SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE PROVISION REQUIRED FOR LETTERS OF CREDIT. ' des. .- •• UL ?. 1 I PLANNING & DEVEL t'mi7l SVCS Page 6 FLD2005-06056 475 EAST SHORE DR Date Received: 06/30/2005 BELLEAIR HARBOR TOWNHOMES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 267A PLANNER OF RECORD: MHR CLWCoverSheet --? BELLEAIR HARBOR TOWNHOMES SITE DATA CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA lx*oo LANG 1M RM - IESORf FACEREE NOI (]0 INy PROPOSED 0.19. 30 USE . A7 ALLO?MOIY PARCEL D 4 oe-ae-, s-, ea,-aoa.aom am Am" 0.10 ACRES 0.1x1 WO SFF130' X !0' w OI rmN ?lkV6 : 471 ADA#AMff LAND U® NORTH - COIIOO/ARMRTEIO SOM - IMRL FAST - OPEN WATER WEST - FAST SNORE MINE - Ip Bu?oaa 6ERlACK9- MOM SEIRICN@ REOMMD PR0IOED F00MT - 0-76 70' SIDE 0-' REAR - O-'w Exd AUMM eIIED3n W. - 36-100' 1118 PROPOSED BLUM NT. - 43T FNOY OROM E NOW PROPOSED BMDeIO M. 7D NOW MIDPOINT 374' FROM SPY LAND OOYM IO031010• PROPOSES BU{O0IO6 0.004 IC- 0.037 AC 1010 /SA/bRWEMKVS 0 M AC ROM ADO •• RkLET1ILY OETIOIMM RgIMO At 0.017 AC TIM. FL0M Z0M SITE 6 Lomm N now 401E PAMEL NO. 131030 0104 4 IMP 0/3/03 BASE FUMD ElLIAMN . 11.0 RUE DCM TO AM OF 1000 TRANER MAMM APACE FM MINT WAWA m1°Ro • MINT a nora 1RWRs ummefummm POMRIE RM SUM TO RE PROWDED IT CRY OF CIFAREOFA. SAISMRY SEVEN SEAM TO RE PRDEMED IT COY OF CIiMM M a= SIOM TO BE PAM= N PROGRESS DEW PARIPKIIOMWA EMM HIED FATLY . 1A UM M PER UMT TOME REAIIEED . 3 IPM= 4 TIM i SPACES OM 4 N 01wo B,"MM 10371 At SUM SMIPEYm RTC. ROM OED COMOT ROAD. RL " NOI POW RRSEY. ROMOA mw (73'7) 63" 40 EMIGM M.W A4&L., OG 310" ID It NORM fMnW71707-4084 34004 CONSTRUCTION PLANS SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PARCEL ID 08-29-15-16434-003-0050 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP PREPARED FOR BELLEAIR HARBOR, LLC. P.O. BOX 5'14 11DIAN ROCKS BEACH, FL 33785 PH (72Z 420-GW FAX (727) 5V-1747 B CLEARNKFER slfW - AE A" OF 4WD-sa61 • MONIOWL PERMITm 1MY BE REOI m - 00MIWCIOII TO MOMY PRIOR TO cown",TIOM PAEPARM BY KRASMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 31564 M 0 NOM A PALM HAFWM R. 34884 PH (727) 787?4 pM FA rM 78 -3M GQ• 2UX 51-483 WARNING CONTRACTOR TO GML move MOM ac Ow 1-800-44-4770 b 110= PRIOR TO AMY CIEA IQ on COMl11010IION PoIT IO031N0 WRTIY IOGTIOIL7 JAIL 0131014 AND OONIMC31M MMT COMWDAW 7D 111 I STAM01ID3 SET mm N TIE CM OF ClLE6N7IO1 RNIO M%Mb TENT. was OR WNW 08DeMNCO Y 011 ??O??lYY?r????WM?1A .Y.,'?? Ntl ? Sl 1wl?irm?= n ?00. aarl4m ?wR?u•ivavt DRAWING INDEX BH9R TITLE 2 OEI@tAL NOTES a EMOMCOICR=+USKLIoNPLAN 4 PIBYWIrPLAT a 611E PLAN FH l R0ATK7N NDTEB µ L A! ? p A 3 ??R ?I i ? ,? ••,•••••''.! "J,?I. Cl? rLJ11'ilY t1 Y?.10l UC.1J G1_ir-• TM RlVBr9 atOa DAIS a 0o-06 JOB NM as= '!1 i I I cor • GBAPMC SCAB Ap1ILT .A1L10r I ?? ? Irr.r a I No 1fArefu'r ,aF,700 r Fors ...AA_ exw E491OLY or im"m LIAfoLn LAL - - I I I I I / ? i ? Ua I SuBAIE7PI:ED U/VO pv?vaev? I C } ? ? 7 I LOT S '?- S VAC"r rrr I i IIII ' ? of Joao coat Nit Uff ..,L I i m I i I Ix am m aeti i.=1. n cae Of0 IM nx191LY OF @WW 10 AAMAY LW 1, 1l REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT I raw mm ? REMOVE EXISTING CONC WALL I I I 33 REMOVE EXISTING WOOD DOCK (TO BE RECONSTRUCTED) I I so= for s 1. T16 ¦ A MaAAMRY AIO TnaaAAn.a rRKY 1NAL W M 6alp amt M tln.A?al a/ A 11ALA y KLffOm LAaLYOR AND MWPER FIII IOLt 711t OOMI1m OM AAE 7. 9COL Lint a M M, K SLUM. e y? •131 DSLUM 0 OI1M M : I?Q : EIlYAilar M[ M1ED a AWAS Of11MIY xDNa WM A• I M CMION OF /1Jt /QT I4RIM M IMTOMAt A00N:i1C F "M MS1A1 10OAK DOW OF IM AW OM FEtT ID owlvtr b 01 M ago= L . AMIN ALL v MIOIt L? 1 mF - I tYt aR r Oa?C w4 ML 1Q `l - ®aLM p[ a EAAIM All I I M I IPWh v tK oF f mm om m 00 sd m1 PG Mx L ?7L1 rGCt. ar amlm a NO Up1rMM tt1?lIF1 aOELObIxp DglalaxdB a -00= D r01M71010 UK MU20 l M {K7lo PALS 676 fR1ET OTM911M NDTfD L Im® L\O M X DDA Tw 70 K mDom . . L 7 rAWY POWUMM am LOAO,f Or A PNOIOED IIIL WIAA11611 W OOM TIME 80WAH MTm I rI . IOOIONL LfL1O /! IWR aUga 711. 9004 AT 1Q4& AIL POIILY NaMR 0 7 1-7111 61 r Q ML & NK a tid 1 LB L ATIDn= L OML? 10 M r; INT IQ LWYE M K%V[ M1 MIM at D MIM L SM LL TO 1 1 01NR M MLWlCIbI iM rOAD K AAal 1110 WLOnATaI rU Of1AIM SOMM OATA 7. ALL EAKLi AM O WMW AK K,O MMM MM CU MM MOM L FLOW ZM 6OWAIM 00111111117 PAWL NUK ,7,0.10 M09 0 K ((11] FLOW 70NMC1P MM 6-0.7-07 K1@D AMID I :J / 1 I I I PLAN, G QD EVEL?/?{}J{?y P1tfjLINr SVCS I EXISTING C0NDIIT0NS "'°°" & DEMOLITION PLAN I I cor i BUN HARBOR CONDO Mm, r rota - I ? I I I ?, ? I I I? i W LOT A 4,082 OF 0.093 AC I I? L2QM' I -3--- -137.13-------- I I II ?I II p Y I LOT B 4,088 OF 0.093 AC I ono xnmm? rni ra me I I i I i MM HM I i CLEARWATER BEACH PARK I i cor• aaa@ ' CR:M SCAM rXi¦¦I¦1 rum•r a ¦¦m rarYNr LM ex Ilm am om omo•r 6 swm Soumm" uc LEGAL DESCRIPTION uj N O 1 o '8 ?m p ?x 01 d Y QGS U-J c m LU o ci6 z a ?I p j j _. •i PLANNING & DEVELQF;-,,-,.-- N ?rSV -S PRELIMINARY PLAT 4 v t I ? tcAaAJ L LRiJf?IING & DEJELOPN-ir- i I S`rC I I xor I acs _AlArLf PArrr - - - - - - ?..?, ' I x W rR TRTYE W 1 r. r. 7mO7 AID OfJAM 7rY Cmt I M TIRIN I I M 7RPIM T6 AAA O7TIROIOR T) OOMAW A: MC 0?11 840? PRIM TO I t r M l ' «s°mti 'tn'0?7s r M112 w ?'°0L iw. COUPM tr N TM ? Q Nam oAxwr uc I ?fA1p PSYi E 1 COIREC7177 I I ? S •M 7 1/! AGAFl? r/ r?CAxAdE MQ tA3Y t CRIN PER IPPA al s i ?? []D UNIT A SY/EOI/ERfZm a vo OFF 6.0 pNauaEOJ C mm um PEwRPnn0 AS RERE lW= W MSI afMM 0°a"OJLm a k? I i /O1a DECK it I ?4 e + R+ $ -1?.1--? UNIT e ' L' I OFF 6.0 P?OL I J M mm I `I I -An-. ' I I d 07e 1110070?R 171.1 Ex 07. Lntonoll tAflF1LY IF s711R R7RRNRT IM M /' lE1Nx iii 1 71a I I W x xd m MAME r A PM I 'RD 1O10E WAA •jO"'E LEGEND I r0O1 HM mw0 mum I I PROMW ICI PAYER POOL IMM A SUM PR7°O® OrIMT Q MOM i AROIRID? AAM M L1GO1 M1C1 AND UMATM I y LOT 0 1 /?iLL' ROOF Off TI S OVMM Tl RERNIxAI & WA WAAL 10 K 'A20111360 AND .f1J3 P, on, PEIE.IIMP At Ir7Rw. Rf PROPO? M.tART t!R t OEM OO7 ? Exa . TO S M MD AND R6VOIRVOIM PEraTINO AS "M N ORCK MOPO? rlal[ I i r T...>. ??? A77AR? To v Pm T t--T •.r-Nr- r lr.r ?YK? I I r, r aarrAr• %WNW etE? ii V1 P?j7^j F- -c a U z Z F CLEANOUT DETAIL CLEANOUT PLUG DETAIL au I! R.wa ..Arr s E SITE PLAN 5 s 0 0 ORIGINAL LOCATION MAP as r?t? R"k a y :st AnWer 5t SITE aim-urvi st C`Pcc?:FZe.?Att,.r ?, lAtd F np aya St 2005 map Om t,com Inc, 02045 N),N+fTE t 0120 PLA?1li?a " F Slvcs! .. CITY QF Jun 22 05 02:39p Robe Bark 1 ey This instrument prepared by (nnd should be returned to): Robert D. Barcley, Esquire 33,39 4" Street North, Suite 574 St. Petersburg, Florida 33741 I'ar el Nu.: 08129115116434A)WA 50 7273-3423 KAft, t:w F. 0 t3 a1?s CpVWYoRto,g4 of couRr OFT: REC an 71 t?20l20pq at i0:48 AM Doe 7YpemlEet) ?= 933.9,t3 t) HOC 64pp STAMP: 7 $10.00 p.2 ORIGINAL WARRANTY DEED (Statutory Form--Scction 689,02, 1',S,) THIS INVENTUXE, made September 15, 2004, by Rocco A. Rao and Donna L. Rao, husband and wii"c (the whose post office addresh is 1470 C'llukar• Ridge, Palm l lurbor, Flork I'l 8.1 34O - 6456, and Parkdale, LLC, a Florida limited liability conipany (1he "Grantee"). whose post office address is 6141 Mears Court, Clearwater, Florida 33760. WITNESSET11: That 0-antor, fin-;uul ill consideration of"the suet 01"1'cn Dollars (`10.00) and other valuable consideration, to Ur:ntor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof and suflicicncy of which is hcrcby acknowledged, has granted, bargained Nul %old to (haul((, its heirs, successors ;Ind assigns ibrever, the lollowing dese6bed land, lo-wit: Lot 5. Block "CC". of the Keplat ol'131ock "A" and Lots 1 to IS, inelusivc, Mock "B" tit' C.'IA;AItWA'i CK BEACH PARK ! IItS'1' ADllE'1'EON, at cording to the plat thcraof recorded in Plat Book 21, page 21, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together wi.lb the submcrp'-d land adjacent thcrcto on the East ol'said I.ot 5, whie111;111d i;; I)OUIXItx) Oil the West by the Eastern boundary line ol'said 1,ot S, and on the 111st by the Westem boundary of' the chunnc:l ill Ocarwatcr Bay, lying East of said Lot 5, on the North by an extension Easterly of ilcc Northern Ivundary line of-said IA S, 10 :;;lid C11:?nnel txlundary line and on the South by an extension Eastcrly of the South bounclary line ol'said Lot 5, to (lie said channel Ixiundary line, together with any and :ill riparian rights appert-iiiiing thcrcto. 't'ogether with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise ippertaining, to have and to hold the same in fce simrlc forcvcr, subject to easetnents, restrictions and reservations of rct:ord, and subject (o (;yeti for the year 2004,ui(l sub,%egtlclll ye.irs. nnd t:iiramor does hcrcby fully warrant the title; to said land, and will (dent (lie same against Ilic lawlir) claims ofall persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF. Grantor has set its hand and seal, the (late first written ;(l)ove. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence oh Nan?c: - OBERT D.1BARCILEY Name: 4OPnquo v.. C-46W aahJ S'T'ATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFMINIELLAS Rocco A. Rao Donna 1„ Rio The furegoirig instrun7cnt was acknOwle(Iged belore Ino this Set)(cnlbe:r 15, 2004, by Rocco A. Kno and Doo)ea 1„ Rao, who I are porsovally known to nic or who pixiduectl l?l'loricl;l 1)rivens i.,iccascs or as idcntificatiort. Robert Q. Bartley CommInion 9 DD330314 Expims June 26, 2008 pmww T"#W-v www%NR /OHIb1019 (NU'I-A tY SEAL) ?f V-E Nola • ?c LE v 1 Z<ibcrl U. I3;IrcleY trial Numbcl-: My Coll ill] issivn expires: II-L/11Yt??el?/?J :'?? (1.1:` ,-...._:iC ? f"f: ,I•, --• Mel I ??ii? ?.w _ -,.f7 .J .Kau 2G 05 04:33p Rob Barcleu 7273-3423 p.2 FUND OWNER 'S FORM Schedule A ORIGINAL Policy No.: OPM-2619833 Effective Date: Scpternber 20, 2004 at WAS A.M. Agent's File Reference: DolpWn 1. Name of Insured: Amount of Insurance: $925,000.00 Park-dale, LLC, a Florida limited liability company 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is a fce simple (if other, specify same) and is at the effective date hereof vested in the named insured as shown by instrurnent recorded in Official Records Book.] 3936, page 933. of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 3. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Lot 5. Block "C", of the Replat of Block "A" and Lots 1 to 15, inclusive, Block "B" of CLEARWATGR BEACH PARK FIRST ADDI'1 ON, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Boot; 2.1, pago 21, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, together with the submerged land adjacent thereto on the Fast of said Lot 5. which land is bounded on the West by the Eastern boundary line of said Lot S. and on the East by the Western boundary of the channel in Clearwater Bay, lving East of said Lot 5, on the North by an extension Etsterly of the Northern boundary line of said Lot 5, to said channel boundary line and on the South by an extension Easterly of the South boundary line of said Lot 5, to the said channel boundary luxe. topthcr with any and all riparian rights appertaining thereto. ?Q?7?7?1RT 1'?. 8A1?_C7L]EV'_ Y?.A._.w ISSUING A(JENT -ATTORNEY OR FIRM OF ATTORNF.YS r ?S ',4 4th Strect,1 oilh, Suite 570 .,. _._......__._._ MAILING ADDRI?SS 18854 AGENT NO. C; NT' SIGNATURE Robert D. Barcley St_Pctershurb Florida __ X37(13 CITY ZIP FUND Foizn OPM-SCI4. A (Re%-. IM [06J Mai 26 05 04:33p Rob Barcley 7273-3423 p.3 FIND DWNER 'S FORM Schedule B ORIGINAL Policy No.: OFM-2619833 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: 1. Taxes for the year of the effective date of this policy and taxes or special assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the public records. 2. Possible fence encroachment on North boundary, asphalt parking encroachment onto right-of-way on West side of property, seawall and dock encroachments on West side of property and other matters of survey shown on the survey prepared by L.R. Penny & Associates, Inc. dated September 10, 2004. bearing Job # 04-1113. 3. Any adverse ownership claim by the State of Florida, or the United States, by right of Sovereignty to any portion of the lands insured hereunder, including submerged, filled and artificially exposed lands, and lands accreted to such lands. 4. Restrictions, conditions, reservations, casements and other maters contained on the plat of CLEARWATER 13EAC14 PA RY, FIRST AMMON, as recorded in Plat Boole 21, page 21, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 5. Those portions of the property herein described comprising artificially filled land in what was formerly navigable waters, arc subject to any and all rights of the United States govcmment's control over navigable waters in the interest of navigation and commerce. 6. Riparian and littoral rights, rights of reliction, and accretion, and any other water rights whatsoever pertaining or related to the subject property arc not insured. . 7. The rights, if any, of the public to use as public beach or recreation area any part of the land lying between the body of water abutting the subject property and the seawall separating the publicly used area from the upland priti,-ate area, or such upland private area as it may have existed prior to the construction of the seawall or bulkhead thereon. 8. Subject to any and all residual royalty rights of Coastal Petroleum Company, or its assigns, resulting from any agreements with the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Futid of Florida, which does not include the right of entry for exploration, mining, or drilling. 9. Basement in favor of City of Clearwater recorded in O.R. Book 12047, page 1791, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. 10. Subject to any lion provided by Chapter 159, Florida Statutes, in favor of any city, township or port autbority for unpaid service charges for service of any water system, sewer system or gas system scrvW--- lands described herein. 11. Mortgage in favor of Colonial Bank, N.A. in the amount of 5693,750,00, dated September 15, 2()04, recorded in U.R. Book 13836, page 934, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. PLMi%T.? ,.. ........ N .A) Fumi 01'M-511.13 (rcv, 5114) [46o] Artist's Exterior Sty I ire • CJ CD b .T_ I I H(D)IMUM oulo)m WUIEM rLii t a z? c 9 0 CD ---,( -c 1w U t s? ? J s 1 rr? W ?cy ?XOWWH 9H(Dl? wul?m • CD cr? CD AF M -4 La CL9 0 I-DI Ln? ' GOr I I AarrLT pommo--? aprt 1MIC{2 AM) 2[A01/1 III! aif r/{ AAP DD l.arp.T mf MaR1 ?MfA Ht wpm , Oa'riY m Oaatl0l M MMLY Or M" BROWAY L.[ rom 1.1 QR?If1P rY ?LN1?Yr1A Pvj I - ay M.wD ULU/.•IaltrcLa \ IO ,? 1?>t :'C ;' ? . k 1 NIT A PDJL OFF 5.0 ;?„t 7i. .17/ANCdGSD LJ !lACLULIClII r •.fh?i'r:?. 3?,..: mAr Iva ;f':?+1: •B UNIT 8 I U G. ' GFF 5.0 +_ I : 1 POOL. lac.:., ppwv.p.mluwgr.rr/ .u aw'N/ro2eawrmwaax R. No1ra/r 1cN rrm CDC Ira7D'V maEw a 0C 2RGNM bAwLY Or tn111 sa/wr LL[ S? Y LO r" 0*4 > 9 12 LEGEND Vo0 bac MW YOUR > rom a (a INMCM NOOL ? • RAM %l PWM ONI2MY d Agr f IrIOlOm rt wwm am arses p Laden wrarf aue? • asm an IIV2m ftu K .L LA ^.4 ?..... I.. G..-J..i- 'Ir •Orcg' . CO411nr11Wlr ---•- C.rmpl N- 1,.aLarp 1pa,a e eou epla.RAw yr. 6-W.A. 10..9+•.24• sq.- It AL7 Ail---kV V.. &A a.W a0., 24•. 24• 30.- 2 a) arrrr.M. M-ayr.r arir./ S 0., aC N.. W.P. as..r. 1e w Irrii W. H&- a ar., 2444. . 24- W. A&..e. 40 LAM LmW...lpa Ylbw Llrwr 1 0.. I r r.. i r yr. IC o.r. aD Dra L. wacrd G dlaser. 10., Irb0.. 12-W. IC o.e. 70 w Nrm plaM. Iri1 ardr a y1., 24' M..24 • W. 90'..0. e NOr Nwlr duJr y.Md D..E Ot.wrs a 0., 24•W a 24•.yr. W o.c I N09 Nr...W.Wr V+ndrrd' DWnr.Tr. lal .&- laps. 24 21 Rrrln^I.?..No I.A-llWA- 30.•la'W.W pr. W- 6 9N 94.trrrcr G.Iiaw0lhNW 'al2.0w 12 91' err lrrrpo C"w rar - 1a0.L 4 2R! Za tlL- C.'* er/r 70.. 9a.301 9.s. _rFUFPAI IALIn?CAPF UYTTFS Li T.rw. lrYrrrw. Ur.INrrM NwrY.r YAr YYI.p. wp4?rl Yarnlrw.rll.wrr?Yrv. N rv.rr O irti ? s d J N '?rY W y S W U ?prr TIC RATING DUAIL K i V C ? w^a."w`r ? Q ELN D Ji 0 1 LANDSC/>p LANDSCAPE IJ I? ARCAITRC T: ?? 1W Oiw rrerr"rfdrllw timm.Ea t'^? '_I . nr L.I.pAarr. PL k N N Ia NJ.]SOIo Scale 1, r I O'-9 ?E L-I I?NM ? ? 1i r..e nrrrrr Mpat ary rlrrJ. IlArWr L. Nrrr Wraaw.4c+nilrlrrrr/1.. /. ?rIMMM ??w?w1?YASdI'w.lwlfrwirrrMr. !. 9M W r"luti.r?lr YM?tr T'wrY. nlrI.I.Y LA/!rY 4 NN??ragWMr1eW11rlrlWOL.fwttv^prs.rrr spry 7. 7/?rYWrrwyrsW? raw. rw r.r.ra+rr A 6r A.w y W Irr?Adw.p7arrr.ir.?ipw?. .w wM wlsar. q.l.mra N.Wrap a w.rw..rr.ir.awrrra??rN.r.rWrr 11r ?r.rar-. r M r?`•r yw.irN rOrraW p.IrA•rW rrrw I0. Cwwm Ywe•a aL.M ?rrwbrTet 11. CiieWragaalYrivrla?w/rwlawwr?a?ls 16 N1aAY*+lepq?lr rl a.p /rr.al rlswWrlYr.OAlefy/rw ?1? b?Y•1hY?C rYrW ?ryr^ri...rrwb. p.Aaa?aY '?. /Nlrpw.Iprwlrp. MaaMa/Mar1aWMW RYrIr•Mlaa 11 M17wiwlw•w,rrrrpr.arMwr.rl.r?i.rrlowlq Ar q. arr.aryAr.r.ywrrrrr lwra 14 Npa.s?N.,,yi?wlrYrrM1arlPrborWr?.w.lYwr,r.r. ¦dYir(IAII//.1D10. FERTILIZATION 11µl /r Trap ryp,r 1?y n dpm Wrarara T"b Od WWillaE?a+aMo ip wlpatW irAaplM = r rrrrr.rrl.rr to 1 file. I•ll.w. VAR L2r.bh L•l1?rYr e4 c- s•tl?r1. fuafw.r •ti 2w rr. SITE DATA BELLEAIR HARBOR TOWNHOMES CITY OF CLEARWATER, PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA ZoNN,>D T - loum LAND Um 344 - RESORr iAC171Ff 11011 (36 1wy PROPOSED USE - 210e79EN1E ,NITS 0.10 a 30 111% .0.7 URII ALlO1RIli PAR 3.Di 06-49_16-104.34-047-0000, 611E &9m 0./14811 ME %W 66 a Sr 490' Mmom LO1 .cm 6O - Lon 4 mu ADJACW LAND U NRm - c.0mo/APArt11m5 Ib4R1 - 11D1R MY - OPEN IMM HEST - UST MORE COW - ADS! OLLDMORBACK& 0 SEMOM PROYM FIM - 0-15 40' SME WAR - 20- 4D5 5 ' 45 • IIRD90, M. 76-100' MAX PROPOSED ILRJ" M. - 43T FROM 0401110, 2 4mn PROPOSED ILLDM M. m ROOF 1489034E SYP FROM IFE LAND COM cosmir PR01'OIm DIRDN47 OM4 AC 0096 AC ASPIYY7/$5/ONyp04 OAS AD 6061 AC 9010, 0AD -0.017 AO OPOSPACE mm • MOM OFIINIEIM MOM AC 6047 AC FLOOD ZONE 341. 14/610 0100 0. IIAP 0/3/b3 EllM710N .110, m 1wD aP flee EX. 7NANEON AM N>1NTACT FED cRw ro dE4WA = mm UOJNY 6F10"7M ?rn0M W or sDlwx m 1[ PROY0,FD er a17 ar arAle4aER. 41aetRC IuP1cE m eE PRDOND M PMORESS EIE40,7. PAN= FfiVAE EM M mDY? . s cRYDts §Nan a6ar .a4.011sEDRa wYCa9M 0,1940,40'6PER 1NR PROYIOEO . s erRDEs 4 N OARAOEA ? lM 6IL N ! SVM eulmnq 1c able OLD Cmmff MOM 116 04 1Ef PORT RIpEY. FIOOM 34867 (727) e3FH40 M qua PL 3X7441 t A370pAlae. w- 31564 06 it NR11N cM 1? pAOImY 34848 CONSTRUCTION PLANS SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 29 SOUTH, RANGE 15 EAST PARCEL ID 08-29-15-16434-O03-0050 LEGAL DESCREPTION LOCATION MAP VICINITY MAP PREPARED FOR BELLEAIR HARBOR, LLC. P.O. BOX 514 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH, FL 33785 PH CM 420-5864 FAX CM 517 V47 PREPAR® BY li KRASMAN AND ASSOCIATES INC , . 3E64 w v tx*rm 4z PALM HARD PL 34684 -6;) o PH cm" 7874684 FAX 0277 78 -wa EB • 25M o WARNIN cwm oR m au SNmm son ONE aw 1-100-432-4770 48 11dIM FII3R m N(! r.d. ^1 now OR c.01e1R4b116E 1011 a== UIM LOG110N3 0 cm ALL NN0,1 110, C0141R1C10,11 1RNf Co1e01E1 m 71E 1/YN saw AROS su roRm N n9: an a c1rA1e9Y1c1 { { '".'".. j C.T! W0, WoEup mI. 401480, OA REIAm OR094NCas r ... DRAWING INDEX OHM Inu J m dp +DEmminONPUW 6 MM AMNAWPLAT NMPLM LL LM kMOA710NNOTE DATE 6-00-06 JOB Nu a@= C) V I I cor • aaArmc ecAts I I AlINLT PAr00? I I I I I FCN 4 I I IN?ATA 70710?Q f /DQ _ Imam LWOLr w 110N mew" LK I I / I - ? °R LOT A srevEraram iwnm ! ? I I ?? I (ivvacuaty) x! 1 1 I 13jtC .1. VACA&r I I ? ? 3? .CDD Doa1 ? ? 0 it II II LOT B DrT ! 0 I 8 2 Q I el 2u ere a u am' I I I Df m0 ffwmuvy 1D.1 n Dolc Dnafol rASmLr V arm aAwr 1K S Q L1 I x cu I I I 10 REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT m .'°Emc,oi 20 REMOVE EXISTING CONC WALL I I lII 3? REMOVE EXISTING WOOD DOCK (TO BE RECONSTRUCTED) cor s ? 1. 71R f A aADrln AID 7T/0iA17?C rAKr rloc ON Tu ala a 7. H 1U*m 1 W A flOOA ?? A? 1raslDm aw7aI11 AIO Y?17R 1DD sL aOfIMFD 0 AK 7.17C/. 7N01 a s M OA2 v rALKY. w rfn . rtiN'! TJ? L L1rAlr AN IN/p ON 11fILN DCIAITT r01f0ANlr 'AIwK IN7A0 Ar L1rAA0M ? iflt N7 1N u "far Mm I I AILIMlr WMAL DATW Q InL ADD aM RT A a11Cti 70 K 1N1101W1 aD01[11C 1QmX IIA N of U mL 01011[ Im L • m P . LifpaA0?i?Y1 * . /K E S fM0 N[ M7m ON H WRr lalT-0hrlr {K v Gif rO[ OM1E N OC a17/Ody IQ ML uj 1m: YaRrmC - m0r11P laL ? 11? Apf Utu ? MM OR LDMONM Mra =WK fERUMN LL) t • fm raly •,II?L. OiK rLN70 .INFO ¢ s PAP Im M : P M : 01®? X DODIO 71(1 70 t YAIVM L Ti- -w r Aremmn l NDM M If A I7NY00 11L1 arYf101! W Ohm 7(111 O?IaA11? 1NTf0 K Y . Fwanw LLLm m mwom > a 100E AT 76M AIL May NII?R OIFLIOLC Cl w . R wl A me N l ATIDIIgI ¦ 0/fDa W iK rZ ANT A6 fUllr INr m ml 10110m 0 F1UlOFD M e 0111 TD lr . H00N1 iDYMt lOa0pIC1171L lli rgND 0L TA101 NID C4K71U7101 r01 CRAKD 1tlYD) pATA In 7. ALL ¦MD7 AND CRN@L AN MMD IfA MM 0? NA7D. L Mao aE MFWW M CO1MA11r PAM NAa IM03Cry0= 0 a ma WMID I/ DA7L 0-0}67 mm- RN {tit Moo cL tn-n ca d EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 -'« & DEMOLITION PLAN 1 I I I I I I I I I i it I I I nor. ? _ ?ww,..rrr? LOT A asermc eceu ?r.r a ocm?ox MMLY Cr ¦rtm ommw uc 5uw?z9t2EV L4,VD O o? °goafi?l m¢ x x d x ? m D co g r? , m PRELMUNARY PLAT N 4 - - - - - - - 1 7.4. I I? LOT B BELLEAIR HARBOR TOWNHOMES c? By Mark Maconi Homes f Ln 1 L" 1{ 0 O _f z JOB ew em. o?.m zi n ?E °4 a i ?d LL W T 0 9 D2005-06056 475 EAST SHORE DR Date Received: 06/30/2005 BELLEAIR HARBOR TOWNHOMES ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 267A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED JU 01 2005 svc51 CLWCoverSheet ?.l n U PLT2005-00015 475 EAST SHORE DR Date Received: 06/30/2005 BELLEAIR HARBOR, LLC ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 267A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLW CoverSheet • U ?. AsE #: Planning and Development Services DATE RECEIVED: 100 South Myitie Avenue RECEIVED BY (staff initials): Clearwater, Florida 33756 ATLA$ PAGE #: Telepfhone: 727-562-4567 ZONING DISTRICT: Fax 727-bfi2-457 6 AND -,USE CLASSIFICATION: 0 SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTAR17PD APPLICATION 0 SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded she plan ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH- I SOUTH: 1 WEST: EAST: /T` COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS . (Revised 9119rA91) D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 41001) APPLICANT NAME:Z G-tr V• L? L L C MAILING ADDRESS: Qp S? 2,111,0,17 V c.L5 L PHONE NUMBER: ,/FAX NUMBER: 1,, U t'O? ? ? VlJ I k(O /0J A. 1.04!: ? 6-41 hp-are 60, PROPERTY OWNER(S): HL/ ?L (Must Include ALL owners) AGENT NAME: (Contact Person) Zr a K r A- S 4111w ?1 MAILING ADDRESS: ?15rrb / y5 If /V 0r A C16 9 &f ? s PHONE NUMBER- 727 - 9$7 - g6sy FAX NUMBER: 2 7-33 Y LT Page I of 3 t OR • ORIGINAL b. The design, character, ration and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landdscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than iandscaping otherwise permiffed on the parcel proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards. The Landscape treatment has been maximized on the property without jeopardizing drainage patterns, underground or overhead utilities, and the function of the building. . 2. Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a pet of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so that the lighting is fumed off when the business is dosed. Lighting will be controlled to be respectful of neighboring properties. 3. Community Character. The ape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater. Page 2 of 3 t1 4. Property Valdes. The Aape?trealrTient proposed in. the ComprehAve Land n h ve a beneficial impact the value of the property the immediate vicinity of the parcel p? The Landscape treatment will benefit value by providing aesthetically pleasing views while providing climate control ' for building and parking areas. 5. Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape bwftient proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed W development is located. Please return checklist for review and verification. omow dint iowabirt>? h otmestaecm , BaucE DANiELS-p a 3Q ,of personally 1ppean3d QuCE D PctJ I Ct.Sc of who havffiq been first d* sworn one fully the corrleits of ? al?vit timt tielshega BRYAN J. STANLEY burr QW.WpppQ574a Epchu tORV2pp7 a w J bonded ftu (8W)MQ512 S: application fan%,!;r e, Page 3 of 3 f . mei 04 s ¢s? a e w #? w i 26 w6 w k? ?M Y i, Payment History For Case #: FLD2005-06056 7/6/2005 2:07PM Recorded. z Type Fee 1D # Description Fees Paid Date Paid Check # Receipt # By Due History FL 200506301517274960 Flexible Commercial 1,205.00 1,205.00 6/30/2005 1426 Total Fees: $1,205.00 Paid: $1,205.00 0.00 1200500000000006124 R_D 0.00 TOTAL REMAINING DUE: $0.00 A Page 1 of 1 CasePaym entH i story.. rpt l M r1 ,,. 7/6/2005 ? 42:07PM Payment History For Case #: PLT2005-00015 Recorded ?Type, Fee ID # Dewription Uees Paid Date Paid Check # Receipt # By Due History PRE 200506301520113400 Preliminary Plat 600.00 0.00 600.00 6/30/2005 1426 Total Fees: $600.00 Paid: $600.00 1200500000000006124 TOTAL REMAINING DUE: R_D 0.00 $0.00 0 r Page 1 of 1 CasePaymentHistory..rpt r r 4 ",4 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C ITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 September 22, 2005 Mr. Bret Krasman. P.E. 31564 US Highway 19 N Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 RE: Development Order - Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 475 East Shore Drive Dear Mr. Krasman: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 square feet to 8,171 square feet, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. and Preliminary Plat approval for two lots. The Community Development Board (CDB) DENIED the application based upon the following findings of fact and conclusions of law: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.19 acre subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District; 2. A building permit for demolition was issued in November 2004 to raze a concrete block motel on this site; 3. Currently, the site is vacant; 4. The maximum permitted density for this site is five dwelling units (based on 30 dwelling units per acre); 5. Adjacent uses are zoned Tourist District; 6. The immediate area is developed with a mixture of attached dwellings and overnight accommodations; 7. The proposed structure height is 32.33 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE); 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this property; 9. The site is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Marina Residential" District; BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR-COMMISSIONER HOYr HAMILTON, VICE MAYOR-COMMISSIONER WHITNEY GRAY, COMMISSIONER FRANK HIBBARD, COMMISSIONER ® BII.I. JONSON, COMMISSIONER "17n.-. V-, r, v,. - -- dr. r..o+..n•rrvr. drnnni T71-1 n-" September 22, 2005 Krasman- Page 2 t 10. The Beach by Design Marina Residential District restricts height to two stories over ground level parking for the east side of East Shore Drive, for parcels less than 2.5 acres. 11. A goal of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District is to attain significant lot consolidation and pedestrian access through consolidated blocks that terminate at a public boardwalk. The proposal is not consistent with the lot consolidation intent of the Marina Residential District and will ultimately preclude the development of a public bayside boardwalk; 12. The project as proposed would allow for very minimal visual access to Clearwater Harbor from the East Shore Drive Right-of-Way; 13. Both the north and south sides, with very minimal open space land, have retention ponds with a 4:1 slope, making utility maintenance access, building maintenance, and dock construction/maintenance very difficult; 14. Staff finds the proposal does not meet the following General Applicability criteria (Section 3- 913): a) Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The lot size is too small in area and has less than the minimum standard required lot width. No lot consolidation has occurred as part of this proposal, which is inconsistent with Beach by Design. The bulk and coverage is too much for this site, as setbacks are encroached. The applicant might consider redesigning the project, with stacked dwelling units instead of side-by-side units. b) Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The development as proposed will clearly hinder or discourage appropriate development and use of adjacent land because it will set precedent as the first Flexible Development or Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application in the Marina Residential District setting a standard in direct conflict with the goal and intent of Beach by Design. The development as proposed will consume a parcel without lot consolidation and without providing the coordinated neighborhood design elements of a walkway and a public boardwalk. c) Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The proposed development is inconsistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. There is minimal to no "view scape" due to only 5-foot side setbacks. The proposed building is out of scale to the lot. The intent of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District is to establish a community character whereby parcels are consolidated and pedestrian access is provided to the Intercoastal Waterway and a public boardwalk, aims that are not met by the proposal. September 22, 2005 Krasman- Page 3 15. Staff finds the proposal does not meet the following Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria (Section 2-803.C): a) The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The proposed building is oversized in scale and bulk for the lot. The unit sizes are substantial and the building design places these large units side-by-side. It is not a matter of the development being impractical without seeking relief from Flexible Development and Comprehensive Infill. b) The development of the parcel proposed for as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal cannot upgrade the immediate vicinity because lot consolidation and the development of a walkway to a public boardwalk have not been proposed, failing to meet the Beach by Design plan for the immediate vicinity which is the Marina Residential District. c) The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. There is no enhancement because the design is seeking too many deviations from the Community Development Code. The residential unit sizes are large at approximately 4,000 square feet each. The building footprint of more than 4,000 square feet is too large in scale and bulk for the 8,171 square foot lot. d) Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The reduction in the side setbacks will result in a building out of scale with the lot on which the building will sit. The applicant has not clearly shown that the flexible development requests provide a benefit to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the property. The mass and scale of the proposed development do not benefit the community character. Adequate view corridors have not been proposed. Conclusions of Law: 1. The proposal is not consistent with the "Marina Residential District" of Beach by Design as no lot consolidation has occurred or is proposed to occur; 2. As Beach by Design states that, `Pedestrian access should be provided through each block to the intercoastal waterway and terminate at a public boardwalk located along the shoreline September 22, 2005 Krasman- Page 4 3. from the Causeway to Mandalay Avenue" the proposal does not address the pedestrian access as intended by Beach by Design; 4. The project as proposed would allow for very minimal visual access to Clearwater Harbor from the East Shore Drive Right-of-Way; 5. Both the north and south sides, with very minimal open space land, have retention ponds with a 4:1 slope, making utility maintenance access, building maintenance, and dock construction/maintenance very difficult; 6. As Beach by Design, states that, "Pedestrian access should be provided through each block to the intercoastal waterway and terminate at a public boardwalk located along the shoreline from the Causeway to Mandalay Avenue" the proposal does not address the pedestrian access as intended by Beach by Design; 7. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Project per Section 2-803.C. 1, 5, 6, and 7; and 8. The proposal does not comply with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.1, 2, and 5. An appeal of a Level Two application decision (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of this Development Order. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB meeting). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4836 You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael el , AI P Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Vnactive or Finished ApplicationslEast Shore 475 Belleair Harbor Townhomes (T) - 9-20-05 - MHR - DeniedlEast Shore 475 Development Order. doe ASTER ACACIA? D . SOMHiSET ? Q O Y caeewA ? oLEYnw C-.? ers'lrr? denon? ?,.? . ?a IERWOOD r-? BAY AYAWN KENDALL BAY E?IANADE e?' F] ?AY e " - PROJECT DAYMONT ST SITE yqP 8Ni ? ""N PdNT PAPAYA ST > S y PISSWE k a ? a "ww O c ew WNDWARD P s R? O RRSr ? Poo? THIRD BT OR } 8 BR?{R yaR OR m D O BAYSIDE ? e w Location Map Owner. Parkdale, LLC Case: FLD2005-06056 Site: 475 East Shore Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.19 acres PIN: 08/29/15/16434/003/0050 Atlas Page: 267A ?E: L'- a V CLEARWATER loo YA HT HASIN BEACH ea. da 19-9?E3UH S? O A 41 Po M H 2b 35 ° 9AY/EO//T ° STREET P 1 '? , se eo eo ' eD ,1I(C , g y I d I ,• ep , D ° , Ilt e1 ?22 07 .' es ? st ??' ? In ' e1 ? I» e ? " s ? slAp d I ° x e E 1 I>p = >t Is ° I>6 TN a St. n > e nr .R m e I eik n . a. I , let > J? 3 Iee T • ? S ,a er ,o o ur 4e4 e s MANDALAY e • Is : 11 0.Ass as BEACH I ?i CLUB " 1e Ii :, ea v1°0 I 122-13 „r 7 » U4r. C I,I 16 » c II a n "vTue L7 p a! PAPAYA A STREET Y 441 Idd 3 n no 2 IN IM In ,o a as , P I 11e , Ia I m Ir! .i to w °e '40 In' T ffi 3 II • C Itt ! la IJA .? \ I.e ?+ >t IDI I P I Idd ,I 28 Idr , 10Ia! I411a r^ 23/01 Im !rr Is . X11 rie n Io Iee „ aer ,. " Ida e' ao n lyo W !ul I "ICY mm All w ; g T/e aoa ,PI ,ey a • I Io $ j 5 1 • q? q ... is I 3 • far °. `,• • ' - ------ --- -- __ uney o, Tnw eo, _ - -- ' -1, $2 _\eo $ q & cALW,AY BLVD g,6 E >n C s 10 s ( 13 12 71 WNCO PPOP[P,v .? g. 1 I` WATER LOT 1 p C UMBIA S B. 23-80 9Lw DDY, Lot 5 r- °i 32/02 32103 2 ? 276A CORAL MOTEL CONDO 42-114 SUN HARBOR CONGO 76-90 P SP/ R s $ R. eo - - ishti I CEWTEft1W (192.1 K F-1 Esist LTOnnel 1028-112 CITY OF CLEARWATER Ste" 6k A}IU TactNIY1f Lh?`lI? ri PnfCUAS COUIITY, PLOMA c? • PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING 100 S. Wylie .le.. Cl-otd, FL 33758 rl?{? Ph, (813)582-4750. Foc (813)528-4755 h11D: //www.cle.Ewald-fl.tan/Mgned/ DhNotmd: Pudlo Inf-If." dol. Ts fumlened Dy the city of elearwaler PuNle Works Admlnlelralbn/Englnwerlnq, End must .e -pt" old used Dy Inc recipient with the underslondNq Thal the dale edved was calleded far the purpose of develwlmq o yoPMc lnlroslructufe i-to,y. A. -&. the City of Clemwotd PWA/E makes no warronlles, e.Dreseed of lenpllod. ConClminq lne o.,,scy. -Dlelmesa, tdIsbillly. a RoD811Y of Al,I dol. f.1 any othd Dotticular use. Furthermore, the City of Cie.,-(I PWA/E assumes na 117"'Ily whatsoever associated with the use ornate .f -1, dot.. This All.. page Is ""Je + to periodic c ongn. Fo, Infofm.llon oewl latest revisr- please all PWA/E o, visit our Wee site. N (1) . 0 100 200 400 600 SCALE: i" = 400' LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER 1234 LOT ADDRESS --- CITY LIMITS LINE r --? SHADED AREA - PROPERTY L -J OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ZONE LINE REVISED: o? B/30/00 ZONING ATLAS NW 1 /4 OF SECTION 2 6 7 A 2768 8 - Z9 S - 15 E 0 • Plant Matenal5 Schedule Qww COY L•fr fr Nero Caron N- ew e•./.., frr. ftv-Lr a?..ar,W Wen i! &S Alan mn"A V.. &W e.yr L qI., tr, 94' Woe. Y d O.nd- wr. LYr aty orre„ a /r.. W bf.. LC Op. Wen IA "M NL••r qr. vhbs 3/L. 2r ht . 21• W. r- 40 uk ?,r- VdamU•Nr 1111.. IrhL.lrgr. ee. a0 LW Lnq. rrfrl a" L.." I d1., IrhL, Irep. I00A. M NO Noun d r. W IXY•k• a /.L, 241 w x 74- yr. W ea D Wr Nrbr d••Wr yek•• D, O DI-11r a WL, Lr k,, t/•.rr. W en 1 x0! Nr.n dr WlbJlr! M.A. T.r IC?L.,Byr. foO f1 N L•11d•rr •W- bWr M.Ih n a /r., Ir k.. Ir W. Wee. G aN aodr. nedl Drt eN d re.rr ITAL. a A- rr. ? Io L 6 4 all Z-LAI?•r• r rrw 741., W. MY Bon ?r .w1. r r W TRM MANnw MrAIL r I•weY n ?nwe numNC oerNL r 1 k ?- -GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES I. N11w•r,Y•rYM1W11 r1.Y•NwW.Y•r..•n.rlr.?...11. reYr.1Y Meb„rrplNr. L NIYrW Yrir f.wwlrlr,eYwrwY,Yy ]. N?w11r.rWMrnr. b,k..Nww.M r. rrNrr•er.r 4 krWMIOpf Ir M•r•1IY.n.?efW.rr !. LMw•wtlf.wl M.L?hyY+T.•I/r.Y1wIIML/•Y. L Ne-?•Ww Wd•.b.l Yrl?for.rrrrrrrr.rlw ?r?w? nprW b w rW?. A.LYr 1. Nwl•+Y .V MrR+?ww?Yw. llr•rr.MronlYw rrW Ywy..l•Aa•. w/ ? ?• ?+••4w1w•I?+A.I..r•e rwY1?NrWn .WrYw rw*. rarrwrrN wr. L IYr•Mr•M?YVIwIryrYw•w•?r?W?•Ir•.MiM Wa f. Nrr•1p•NwYw1.•W YwwbrNe.f?r•1-1.•reyeMlwr.• 0 ?r.•11ir yW rMrrrwwr?IL Ii. bbY/.1Mnn•W.tr resr..rerrrwwrl.Nwkr••. IL NlwrrY+ Yr••r.N Wrw•Irf NOwYMMY•IYIM??Iff..I?p I?l?1?YL`•hlwr•?. Garr w+•YN fwr J •rLr, rMw lr. rr•I Mq?•I•I'f.Yr M.N /r•Yr••, f?1• N.•w fewy N/•r,r?•'e.YMPRr W /-IW.. IL Ngr.r.YnlYr.e.YMwYMwtw•q•0-Ilrr rr10 r1y •qf q•. w1b1r1. r N .r.w M w •ew r fer IArY.rr/ A?tlf1 wprMl w WL?•M1•N? IYIM irW Yw INY.f. MMUZATION ahnf. w TN- Nwrrwewrb..w1•'ArL.rf6IN Wrrrr Nrwr rfrw ?5b11wYr1t rrrn.IMl?.r.+.Y. 11. wnerr.•W •arr wrr brrrwwrr ??LpI Lp? I'?fir.? ..u frlrr LLr.v.r• l-u L-rM. fLr.u•+. f-u prrkl ?or.u... ?-eI Y1r. ? aMt'rr r..r le.yrrY.L ?? ?r-.Yrr.rvr•r•rrlrrr?w?wv TIC "'T"ON DOTAL N LU E O 0 444W4 d I m CDA I vtI D lreiLifYl Mm w mm- ftw. 0 C 6 a IFHQ)HU D \NIIF=gu WHEIN Artist's Exterior Styline D 117- • • w nil m sed a 0 0 1 ?y R3. C) C j U? H(D)HUM M F-U WHIEM O r ' ¦ r- -l L-J • • !nr u` f Erg 0 AMM _ r? d --ffl r t 0• • r t?? V 1 ?U w, ? l 1 O G7 1 I MO P J,ximm " R m x, ,`;r t J a 1 `` or r 40 .' r ~ 7! 7 i 4 41 Aerial Map Owner. Parkdale, LLC Case: FLD2005-06056 Site: 475 East Shore Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.19 acres PIN: 08/29/15/16434/003/0050 Atlas Page: 267A I' I I - Pik -41 y. Now- Looking southwest at subject property (left) and abutting property to the south (left). View of property to the northwest. 475 East Shore Drive FLD2005-06056 Looking northwest toward subject property. Looking east at property and Clearwater Harbor View to the south. 1 I 1 jri 501 1 HDR 1 ;1 ! j ---1 +- ; 499 495' ' I --? 4--i I--J - - - - - - - ?_4#3 489 f ) 44_ ? i 1 f r,,,._I t_J 1 1 I 485 1 `.• tit 1 1483 1 ,, 1 7?r- I I 1483 i--__ 1 4 475r1-, 475 1_ -, 1 1 47 `--u _ - ----r- 1 ! , r 1- 1 _ ru =ru._ l 4f 3 - j I - ? 1-_.- 1 67 471 ?--' 1 , -467 1 _' --48 _-' 47 q? 459 ------ I 457 46 ; 463 _J 455 ------- 1 453 ' 4W III J iJ i 1 1 l 4j i L - - 449 L--" 1-- 1 1 ti ?' --- r_i ; 1 cl 443 1 7 _^t I J _ N 1 ?1 J __J ' _? y r---- _r4? it 1 ?L 1 437 1 1+' f 1 1 1 1 y, -431_1 I 1 f "FS?LP_+ t_ t 430 429 439 1 1 j yy,G?427Meter ! r _i -423, i Owner. Parkdale, LLC Site: 475 East Shore Drive Zoning Map Case: Property Size(Acres): PIN: Atlas Page: FLD2005-06056 0.19 acres 08/29/15/16434/003/0050 267A J II 1 507 ? ?00 ^l J l -------, Belle Harbor Attached 0 ; - Dwellings BAYMONT ST ------- - ,------- 499 nt 1 J -- -- J 495 •^ j _...? 4 - $3 1 A _ -7 ,L r 1 I _ _ ? r 1 489 Retail; l -- i-? - 1483 1 Ir_ i 1 chi 1 ------ r 1 ? 1 '4 483 ?-! elli4s -`- 1 1 4 L-- r'- Q 4 ?giant- w _-? 47 I 1 Q rLrsu.- r 47'Oag Clearwater -- Q etail 67 !? , L I ? Harbor Q 1 487 ; 5 ; 47 , L Q 4 f? ? 485 _a-'LJ 1---- - - 459 ? p ? f 457 48 "b ' y 1 4 ", I 483 ?---I ~ i 453 -449 ` 1 - - 449 t'-'" l-- ` 443 1 7 43 _149 ST 1 L - 4W F-- I r 1 , 430 If t 429 439 j_I 1 ?-423, i 427Meter r-_j Existing Land Use Map Owner: I Parkdale, LLC Case: FLD2005-06056 Site: 475 East Shore Drive Property 0.19 acres Size(Acres): 08/29/15/16434/003/0050 PIN: Atlas Page: 267A ?r --- ; --- RH WA TE _ 501 YO )400 RH i i BAYMONT ST r ?_J 4951 ^' 1 , 1 _'r- 1 1 I 1 48? - r43 -7 ,L ' - r r i 489 _ I --I L ~ , r I 485 ! 1 L ?- r483 ? ? ?r-_ 1 1 ------ 1483 477+ ' 4 L-- 1 j 475r1^, 475 _ I 1? 1 j 4' y WATER ` Q RFH ; _ B, ' 467 ; 2 _ r I ---? 47 Q = --- ' G) 465 _Y-- ; -_-1 1 459 _ 457 46 ~ -- ' 1------4 y 463 ---1 453 14-15311 _, .,. 4511 -- \ .._ W L-,1 ' 449 , LI ---! _ _ - '--- ' 449 L-- i- + l 1 r_, _ 11 i t 443 7 ST 11 1 , J -- - - I!+ 44 4r----? , 1 f J h ' p 1 5 _ ,_ ------- I RFC - - 429 427Meter I r _i i Future Land Use Map Owner. Parkdale, LLC Case: FLD2005-06056 Site: 475 East Shore Drive Property 19 acres 0 Size (Acres) : . 08/29/15/16434/003/0050 PIN: Atlas Page: 267A V - § 2-70:1 COMMUNITY DEVELOI)NIF,NT CODE: 2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment does not involve animal confine- ment facilities that are open to the out- side. 3. Lot area and taidth: The reduction in lot area and width will not result in a build- ing which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 4. Side and rear setback: a. The reduction in side and/or rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles. b. The reduction in side and/or rear setback results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking, or im- proved design and appearance and landscaped areas are in excess of the minimum required. 5. Front setback: The reduction in front set- back results in an improved site plan or improved. design and appearance. (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6680-01, 3, 4-5-01; Ord. No. 6928-02, tiff 15, 16, 5-2-02; Ord. No. 71.06-03, § 1, 9-18-03) DIVISION S. TOURIST DISTRICT ("T") Section 2-801. Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of the Tourist District ("T") is to provide a safe and attractive tourist destination in the City of Clearwater with a full complement of tourist accommodations and con- venient access to goods and services. Section 2-801.1. Maximum development po- tential. The Tourist District ("T") may be located in more than one land use category. It is the intent of the T District that development be consistent with the Countywide Future Land Use Plan as required by state law. The development potential of a parcel of land within the T District shall be determined by the standards found in this Devel- opment Code as well as the Countywide Future Land Use Designation of the property. For those parcels within the T District that have in area within the boundaries of and governed by a spe- cial area plan approved by the City Commission and the Countywide Planning Authority, inaxi- mum development potential shall be as set forth for each classification of use and location in the approved plan. Development potential for the Countywide Future Land Use Designations that apply to the T District are as follows: Orcrnitilrl C"1111lYlvide Future Alluxioulot Dnvellinti Units M(ru/n.unr MoorArra Ratio/ Accornot.odolio)r.c Lourl Use Dc.eignoliou per Arrr of La11d lnr.pe viou.c Sur/ace Rcllio Units per Acre Fwil1(.les I ti-11 .30 (IW(T)1- 1111ils per lwr(: FAR 1.0/1St .95 /10 lllllf?d I)14' 11cn% (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6680-01, § 7, 4-5-01) Section 2-802. Flexible standard develop- ment. The following uses are Level One permitted. uses in i;he T District subject to the standards and criteria set out in this section and other applica- ble provisions of Article 3. NI i. 11 CD2:64 ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-802 Table 2-802. "T" District Flexible Standard Development Standards Min. Lot Min. Lot Max. Area Width Height Min. Setbacks Min. Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ftJ (ft.) Density Parking Front Side Rear Accessory Dwellings n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 30 ? ? 1/unit Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35 10-15 10 20 n/a 5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellings 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 10. 10-20 30acre units/ 1.5 per unit Governmental Uses(1) 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 3-_/1,000 GFA Indoor Recreation/Entertain- 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 20 n/a 10 per 1,000 GFA ment Medical Clinic 10,000 100 30-50 10-15 10 20 20 2-3/1,000 GFA Nightclubs 5,000 50 35 15 10 20 n/a 10 per 1,000 GFA Non-Residential O$ Street n/a n/a n/a 25 5 10 n/a n/a Parking Offices 10,000 100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 3-4 spaces per 1,000 GFA 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of lot area or as determined by Outdoor Recreatidn/Enter- 5,000 50 35 10-15 10 20 n/a the community de- tainment velopment director based on FIE Man- ual standards Overnight Accommodations 20,000 100-150 35-50 10-15 0-10 .10-20 40 rooms/ acre 1 per.unit Parking Garages and Lots 20,000 100 50 .15-25. 10 10-20 n/a n/a 1 per 20,000 SF land area or as de- termined by the Parks and Recreation Facili- n/a n/a 50 25 10 20 n/a community develop- ties ment coordinator based on ITE Man- ual standards Public Transportation Facili- n/a n/a 10 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a ties(2) Sidewalk Vendors n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Restaurants 5,000- 50-100 25-35 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 7-15 spaces per 000 GFA 1 10,000 , Retail Sales and Services 5,10,000000- 50-100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a -5 spaces per 4 1,000 GFA Social and Community Center 000 - 5 50-100 35-50 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 4-5 spaces per 41 000 -5 GFA 000 10, , Utility/Infrastructure Facili- n/a n/a n/a 25 10 10 n/a n/a ties(3) Supp. No. 6 CD2:65 § 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (1) Governmental uses shall not exceed five acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed five acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Institutional which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (2) Public transportation facilities shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Transportation/Utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. (3) Utility/infrastructure uses shall not exceed three acres. Any such use, alone or when added to contiguous like uses which exceed three acres shall require a land use plan map amendment to Transportation/Utility which shall include such uses and all contiguous like uses. Flexibility criteria: A. Alcoholic beverage sales. Location. a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; C. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guide- lines in Division 5 of Article 3. 2. Front setback: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design or appearance. B. Attached dwellings. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved de- sign and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground floor of the residential building. 2. Parking: Off-street parking within the footprint of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architec- tural character and finishes of a residen- tial building without parking on the ground level; 3. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b.. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; e. The reduction in rear setback does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 5. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. C. Governmental uses. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel Supp. No. 6 CD2:66 ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-802 proposed for development unless such D. Indoor recreation /entertainment. signage is a part of an approved compre- 1. The design of all buildings complies with sign program; hensive the Tourist District design guidelines in 3. Location. The use of the parcel proposed Division 5 of Article 3. for development will not involve direct 2. Setbacks: access to a major arterial street; a. The reduction in front setback con- 4. Setbacks: tributes to a more active and dy- a. The reduction in front setback con- namic street life; tributes to a more active and dy- b. The reduction in front setback re- namic street life; sults in an improved design and ap- b. The reduction in front setback re- pearance; sults in an improved site plan or c. The reduction in side setback does improved design and appearance; not prevent access to the rear of any c. The reduction in side and rear set- building by emergency vehicles; back does not prevent access to the d. The reduction in side setback results rear of any building by emergency in an improved site plan, more effi- vehicles; cient parking or improved design d. The reduction in side and rear set- and appearance.. back results in an improved site plan, e. The reduction in side setback results more efficient parking or improved in landscaped areas in excess of the design and appearance; minimum required. e. The reduction in side and rear set- 3. Height: The increased height results in an back does not reduce the amount of improved site plan or improved design landscaped area otherwise required. and appearance. 5. Off-street parking: E. Medical clinic. a. Adequate parking is available on a 1. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- shared basis as determined by all opment is compatible with surrounding existing land uses within 1,000 feet properties. of parcel proposed for development, . or parking is available through any 2. Off-street parking: existing or planned and committed a. Adequate parking is available on a parking facilities or the shared park- shared` basis as determined by all ing formula in Article 2, Division 14; existing land uses within 1,000 feet b. The physical characteristics of a pro- of the parcel proposed for develop- posed building are such that the ment, or parking is available through likely uses of the property will re- any existing or planned and commit- quired fewer parking spaces per floor ted parking facilities or the shared area than otherwise required or that parking formula in Article 2, Divi- the use of significant portions of the sion 14; building will be used for storage or b. The physical characteristics of a pro- other non-parking demand-generat- posed building are such that the ing purposes. likely uses of the property will re- 6. The design of all buildings complies with quire fewer parking spaces per floor the Tourist District design guidelines in area than otherwise required or that Division 5 of Article 3. the use of significant portions of the Supp. No. 6 CD2:67 § 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- ing purposes. 3. Front setback: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance.. 4. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design or appearance. F. Nightclubs. 1. Location. a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 2. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. G. Non-residential off-street parking. 1. The parcel proposed for development is contiguous to the parcel on which the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, is located and has a common boundary of at least 25 feet, or the parcel proposed for develop- ment is located immediately across a pub- lic road from the non-residential use which will be served by the off-street parking spaces, provided that access to the off- street parking does not involve the use of local streets which have residential units on both sides of the street. 2. No off-street parking spaces are located in the required front setback for detached dwellings in the T District or within ten feet, whichever is greater, or within (10) feet of a side or rear lot line, except along the common boundary of the parcel pro- posed for development and the which the non-residential use be served by the off-street park: 3. Off-street parking spaces are s a wall or fence of at least fc height which is landscaped on nal side with a continuous hee deciduous vine. 4. All outdoor lighting is aut switched to turn off at 9:00 p.m. 5. All parking spaces shall be surface park- ing. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. H. Offices. 1. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment fronts on but will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 2. All signage is a part of the comprehensive sign program; 3. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Article 3 Division 5. 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic streetlife; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- backs results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or im- proved design and appearance; e. The reduction in side and rear set- backs results in landscaped areas in excess of the minimum -required. Supp. No. 6 CD2:68 v_x? -xr.l ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-802 5. Off-street parking: 6. Front setback: a. Adequate parking is available on a a. The reduction in front setback con- shared basis as determined by all tributes to a more active dynamic existing land uses within 1,000 feet street life; of parcel proposed for development, b. The reduction in front setback re- or parking is available through any sults in an improved site plan or existing or planned and committed unproved design and appearance. parking facilities or the shared park- ing formula in Article 2, Division 14; 7. Off-street parking. b. The physical characteristics of a pro- a. Adequate parking is available on a posed. building are such that the shared basis as determined by all likely uses of the property will re- existing land uses within 1,000 feet quire fewer parking spaces per floor of the parcel proposed for develop- area than otherwise required or that ment, or parking is available through the use of significant portions of the any existing or planned and commit- building will be used for storage or ted parking facilities or the shared other. non-parking demand-generat- parking formula in Article 2, Divi- ing purposes. sion 14; or 6. Height:. The:increased height results in an b. The physical characteristics of a pro- improved site : plan or improved design posed building are such that the and appearance. likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor I. Outdoor recreation /entertainment. area than otherwise required or that The parcel proposed for development is 1 the use of significant portions of the . not contiguous to a parcel of land which is building are used for storage or other designated as residential in the Zoning non-parking demand-generating pur- Atlas; poses. 2. All signage is a part of a comprehensive J. Overnight accommodations. sign program; 1. Location: The use of the parcel proposed Sound amplification is designed and con- 3 for development will not involve direct . strutted to ensure that no amplified sound access to a major arterial street; can be heard to the extent that the sound 2. Height: The increased height results in an is recognizable in terms of the meaning of improved site plan and/or improved de- words or melody when wind conditions sign and appearance; are less than ten miles per hour at a distance of more than 100 feet in all 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or directions or when wind conditions are located so that any portion of the sign is ten miles per hour or greater at a distance more than six feet above the finished of more than 150 feet in all directions; grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such 4. All outdoor lighting is designed and con- signage is a part of an approved compre- structed so that no light falls directly on hensive sign program; land other than the parcel proposed for development; 4. Setbacks: 5. The design of all buildings complies with a. The reduction in front setback con- the Tourist District design guidelines in tributes to a more active and dy- Division 5 of Article 3. namic street life; Supp. No. 6 CD2:69 § 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c. The reduction in side and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- backs results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or im- proved design and appearance; e. The reduction in side and rear set- backs does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 5. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 6. Lot width: The reduction in lot width will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the imme- diate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. K Parking garages and lots. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to land designated as res- idential in the Zoning Atlas; 2. Access to and from the parking garage or lot shall be based on the findings of a transportation analysis approved by the city; 3. The stacking spaces available for cars waiting to pass through a parking ticket dispensable or booth to enter the garage or lot shall be based on the design and size of the garage or to-,; 4. Any frontage along a public street is land- scaped or designed to be similar in char- acter and use to other uses fronting on each street for a distance of 250 feet in either direction along the street or the nearest intersections, whichever is less; 5. Parking structures are designed, con- structed and finished so that the struc- ture of the garage is architecturally com- patible the design and character of adjacent principal uses; 6. There is an unmet existing demand for additional parking in the immediate vi- cinity of the parcel proposed for develop- ment; 7. Construction of a parking structure.would not otherwise be physically feasible; 8. The front and rear setbacks which are provided are improved as an arcade or with other active pedestrian/commercial areas for sidewalk cafes, sidewalk ven- dors, street furniture or urban amenities; 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 10. Front setback: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active dynamic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance. 11. Rear setback: a. The reduction in rear setback does not prevent access to the rear of any building by. emergency vehicles; b. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in rear setback re- sults in landscaping in excess of the minimum required. L. Parks and recreation facilities. 1. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding properties. 2. Off-street parking is screened from adja- cent parcels of land and any street by a landscaped wall or fence of at least four feet in height. 3. All outdoor lighting is designed so that no light fixtures cast light directly on adja- cent land used for residential proposes. 4. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined Supp. No. 6 CD2:70 ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-802 by all existing land uses within 1,000 5. Setbacks: square feet of the parcel proposed for a. The reduction in front setback con- development, or parking is available tributes to a more active and dy- through any existing or planned and com- namic street life; mitted parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 3, Division 14. b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or M. Public transportation facilities. improved design and appearance; The public transportation facilities are not located within 1,000 feet of another public transportation facility unless nec- essary to serve established transit stops with demonstrated ridership demand; 2. The public transportation facilities are designed, located and landscaped so that the structure of the facilities are screened from view from any residential use or land designated as residential in the Zon- ing Atlas; C. The -reduction in side and rear set- backs does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- backs results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or im- proved design and appearance; e. The reduction in side and rear set- backs does not reduce the amount of landscaped area otherwise required. 3. All lighting associated with the public 6. Off-street parking: transportation facilities is designed and a. The physical characteristics of a pro- located so that no light is cast directly on posed building are such that the any residential use or land designated as likely uses of the property will re- residential in the Zoning Atlas; quire fewer parking spaces per floor 4. The design of all buildings complies with area than otherwise required or that the Tourist District design guidelines.in the use of significant portions of the Division 5 of Article 3. building will be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- N. Restaurants: ing purposes; 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot b. Adequate off-street parking is avail- area will not result in a building which is able on a shared basis as determined out of scale with existing buildings in the by all existing land uses within 1,000 immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed feet of the parcel proposed for devel- for development; opment, or parking is available through any existing or planned and 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed committed parking facilities or the for development will not involve direct shared parking formula in Article 2, access to a major arterial street; Division 14; 3. Height: The increased height results in an c. Fast food restaurants shall not be improved site plan and/or improved de- eligible for a reduction in the num- sign and appearance; ber of off-street parking spaces. 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or 7. The design of all buildings complies with located so that any portion of the sign is the Tourist District design guidelines in more than six feet above the finished Division 5 of Article 3. grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such O. Retail sales and services. signage is a part of an approved compre- 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot hensive sign program; area will not result in a building which is Supp. No. 6 CD2:71 § 2-802 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height:.The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; ment,. or parking is available through any existing or planned and commit- ted parking facilities or the shared parking formula in Article 2, Divi- sion 14. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. R Sidewalk vendors. 4. Setbacks: 1. The location of the sidewalk vendor does a. The reduction in front setback con- not impair pedestrian movement. tributes to a more active and dy- 2. The land occupied by a sidewalk vendor is namic street life; not designated or used for required off- b. The reduction in front setback re- street parking. sults in an improved site plan or Q Social and community center. improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- 1. The parcel proposed for development does backs does not prevent access to the not abut any property designated as res- rear of any building by emergency idential in the Zoning Atlas. vehicles; 2. Front setback: The reduction in front set- d. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan or backs results in an improved site improved design and appearance. plan, more efficient parking or im- 3. Side and rear setback: The reduction in proved design and appearance; side and/or rear setback is necessary to e. The reduction in side and rear set- preserve protected trees and/or results in backs does not reduce the amount of an improved site plan or more efficient landscaped area otherwise required; design and appearance and results in 5. Off-street parking: landscaping in excess of the minimum required. a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the R. Utility/infrastructure facilities. likely uses of the property will re- 1. Any above ground structure other than quire fewer parking spaces per floor permitted telecommunication towers and area than otherwise required or that utility distribution lines located on or the use of significant portions of the along a rear lot line shall be screened building will be used for storage or from view by a landscaped opaque wall or other non-parking demand-generat- fence which is at least two-thirds the ing purposes; height of the above ground structure and b. Adjacent land uses are of a nature shall be landscaped with trees which five that there is a high probability that years after installation substantially will patrons will use modes of transpor- obscure the fence or wall and the above tation other than the automobile to ground structure; access the use; 2. The design of all buildings complies with c. Adequate parking is available on a the Tourist District design guidelines in shared basis as determined by all Division 5 of Article 3. existing land uses within 1,000 feet (Ord. No. 6526-00, § 1, 6-15-00; Ord. No. 6928-02, of the parcel proposed for develop- §§ 17 -20, 5-2-02) Supp. No. 6 CD2:72 ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-803 Section 2-803. Flexible development. to the standards and criteria set out in this The following uses are Level Two permitted section and other applicable provisions of Article uses permitted in the Tourist "T" District subject 3. Table 2-803. "T" Flexible Development Standards Min. Lot Min. Lot Max. Min. Min. Area Width Height Front Min. Side Rear Mina Off-Street Use (sq. ft.) (/t•) (fl.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Density Parking Alcoholic Beverage Sales 5,000 50 35=100 0-15 0=10 10-20 n/a. 5 per 1,000 GFA Attached Dwellings 5,000- 5100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 30 un. e 1.5 per unit 10,000 acr Determined by the 30 units/ community devel- opment coordinator Comprehensive Infill n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a acre; 40 based on the spe- Redevelo ment Project(l) P rooms/ cific use and/or acre ITE Manual stan- dards Limited Vehicle Sales and 000 5 50 35---100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 4-5 spaces per Display , 1,000 GFA Marina Facilities 5;000 50 25 10-15 0-10 10-20 n/a. 1 space per 2 slips Nightclubs. 5,000 50 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 10 per 1,000 GFA Offices 10,000 100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 3-4 spaces per 1,000 GFA Outdoor Recreation/Enter- 5'1000 50 35 5-15 0-10 10-20 n/a tainment Overnight Accommodations 000 - 10, 100-150 35-100 0-15 0-10 0-20 40 acre rooms/ 1 per unit 000 20, Restaurants 5,000- 50-100 25-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 7-15 spaces per 000 GFA 1 10, ,000 0 , Retail sales and services 000 - 5, 50-100 35-100 0-15 0-10 10-20 n/a 4-5 spaces per 000 GFA 1 000 10, , (1) Any use approved for a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Froject shall be permittea py the underlying Future Land Use Plan Map designation. Flexibility criteria: A. Alcoholic beverage sales. 1. Location: a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved de- sign and appearance; . 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is Supp. No. 6 CD2:73 § 2=803 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless the sign is a part of a comprehensive sign pro- gram; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. B. Attached dwellings. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to an arterial street; 3. Height: a. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved de- sign and appearance; b. The increased height is necessary to allow the improvement of off-street parking on the ground. floor of the residential building; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; I The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non- parking demand-generating purposes or that the nature of the individual dwelling units and their location is likely to lead to dependency on non- automobile modes of transportation; b. Off-street parking within the foot- print of the residential building is designed and constructed to create a street level facade comparable to the architectural character and finishes of a residential building without park- ing on the ground level. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. C. Comprehensive infill redevelopment projects. The development or redevelopment.of the parcel proposed for development is other-. wise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development stan- dards; 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; Supp. No. 6 CD2:74 ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-803 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill 3. No vehicle service: shall be provided on redevelopment project are otherwise per- the parcel proposed for development. mitted in the City of Clearwater; E. Marina facilities. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the com- prehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 5. Suitable sites for development or redevel- opment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater; 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed 2 for development; 7. The design of the proposed comprehen- sive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for devel- opment and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character .and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; 9. Adequate off-street parking in the imme- diate vicinity according to the shared park- ing formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel pro- posed for development; 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. D. Limited vehicle sales and display. 1. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- opment shall be located in an enclosed structure. 1. The parcel proposed for development is not located in areas identified in the Com- prehensive Plan as areas of environmen- tal significance including: a. The north end of Clearwater Beach; b. Clearwater Harbor grass beds; C. Cooper's Point; d. Clearwater Harbor spoil islands; Sand Key Park; f. The southern edge of Alligator Lake. No commercial activities other than the mooring of boats on a rental basis shall be permitted on any parcel of land which is contiguous: to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas, unless the marina facility is totally screened from view from the contiguous land which is designated as residential and the hours of operation of the commer- cial activities are limited to the time pe- riod between sunrise and sunset; 3. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a . more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 4. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 2. The use of the parcel proposed for devel- 5 opment shall have no outdoor displays. Supp. No. 6 CD2:75 All marina facilities shall comply with the commercial dock requirements set forth § 2-8.03 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE in Section 3-601.C.3 and the marina and marina facilities requirements set forth in Section 3-603. F. Nightclubs. 1. Location: a. The parcel proposed for development is not contiguous to a parcel . of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning Atlas; b. The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved de- sign and appearance; 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless the sign is a part of a comprehensive sign pro- gram; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. G. Offices. 1. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; 2. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; 3. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; c_ The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5.' Off-street parking: a.. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building will.be used for storage or other non-parking demand-generat- ing purposes; b. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for develop- ment, or parking is available through existing or planned and committed parking facilities or the shared park- ing formula in Article 3, Division 14. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. Supp. No. 6 CD2:76 ZONING DISTRICTS § 2-803 H. Outdoor recreation /entertainment. or planned and committed parking facili- ties or the shared parking formula in 1. The parcel proposed for development is Article 3, Division 14. not contiguous to a parcel of land which is designated as residential in the Zoning I. Overnight accommodations. Atlas; 1. Location: The use of the parcel proposed 2. All signage is a part of a comprehensive for development will not involve direct sign program; access to an arterial street; 3. Sound amplification is designed and con- structed to ensure that no amplified sound can be heard to the extent that the sound is recognizable in meaning of or identity of a melody when wind conditions are less than ten miles per hour at a distance of more than 100 feet in all directions or when wind conditions are ten miles per hour or grater at a distance of more than 150 feet in all directions; 4. All outdoor lighting is designed and con- structed so that no light falls directly on land other than the parcel proposed for development; 5. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance. 6. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 7. Off-street parking: Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet of the parcel proposed for development, or parking is available through any existing 2. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved de- sign and appearance; 3. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless such signage is a part of an approved compre- hensive sign program; 4. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan .or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 5. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. 6. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area and/or lot width will not result in a building which is out of scale with exist- ing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. J. Restaurants. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is Supp. No. 6 CD2:77 § 2-803 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE out of scale with existing buildings in the of the parcel proposed. for develop- immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed ment, or parking is available through for development; any existing or planned and commit- 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed ted parking facilities or the shared for development will not involve direct parking formulas in Article 3, Divi- access to a major arterial street; sion 14. 3. Height: The increased height results in an improved site plan and/or improved de- sign and appearance; 4. Signs: No sign of any kind is designed or located so that any portion of the sign is more than six feet above the finished grade of the front lot line of the parcel proposed for development unless the sign is a part of a comprehensive sign pro- gram; 5. Setbacks: a. The reduction in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear set- back does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emergency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- back results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or improved design and appearance; 6. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the building for storage or other non- parking demand-generating purposes; b. Fast food restaurants shall not be eligible for a reduction in the num- ber of off-street parking spaces; C. Adequate parking is available on a shared basis as determined by all existing land uses within 1,000 feet 7. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. K Retail sales and services. 1. Lot area and width: The reduction in lot area will not result in a building which is out of scale with existing buildings in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 2. Location: The use of the parcel proposed for development will not involve direct access to a major arterial street; 3. Height. The increased height results in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; 4. Setbacks. a. The reduction. in front setback con- tributes to a more active and dy- namic street life; b. The reduction in front setback re- sults in an improved site plan or improved design and appearance; C. The reduction in side and rear and setbacks does not prevent access to the rear of any building by emer- gency vehicles; d. The reduction in side and rear set- backs results in an improved site plan, more efficient parking or im- proved design and appearance; 5. Off-street parking: a. The physical characteristics of a pro- posed building are such that the likely uses of the property will re- quire fewer parking spaces per floor area than otherwise required or that the use of significant portions of the Supp. No. 6 CD2:78 Amk FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO- rcl old/?/in?y FAX: -7 of Phone: FROM- /2 l Phone: DATE: SUBJECT: /?/iD ??dJ D6 b ?? /Jlr 9.00 ,1 Ebb! r MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) CDB Meeting Date: Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owners: Applicant: Representative: Address: September 20, 2005 FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 F13 Parkdale, LLC Belleair Harbor, LLC Mr. Bret Krasman, PE; Krasman and Associates 475 East Shore Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 square feet to 8,171 square feet, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. and Preliminary Plat approval for two lots. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District LAND USE: Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.19 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Attached dwellings LAND USES: East: Preservation District; Clearwater Harbor South: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations (motel) West: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations (motel) Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 1 of 9 CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a mixture of attached dwellings, detached dwellings and overnight accommodation uses. Clearwater Harbor is to the east. The site is walking distance to Clearwater Beach and the Gulf of Mexico. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.19 acres is located on the east side of East Shore Drive, approximately 300 feet south of the intersection of East Shore Drive and Baymont Street. The site is vacant and is fronted by Clearwater Harbor to the east and East Shore Drive to the west. The East Shore Resort motel is to the south. An attached residential unit building is located to the north. According to City records, a building permit for demolition was issued in November 2004 to raze a concrete block motel on this site. Records indicate that seven rental units were housed on this property. The parcel is zoned Tourist (T) District. This property is relatively flat. East Shore Drive is a north - south street, parallel to the Poinsettia Avenue and Mandalay Avenue which are heavily traveled north - south corridors to the west. East Shore Drive is frequented by both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Adjacent uses are located within the Tourist Zoning District. Surrounding land uses include overnight accommodations, attached dwellings, retail, and restaurants. Proposal: The proposal includes constructing two attached dwellings in a building with two living floors over one level of parking. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 square feet to 8,171 square feet, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way. A preliminary plat application has also been made for two lots. The proposed building height is 32.33 feet above Base Flood Elevation (BFE), which conforms to code. The Beach by Design Marina Residential District restricts height to two stories over ground level parking for the east side of East Shore Drive, for parcels less than 2.5 acres. The application is seeking eight approvals to vary from the Community Development Code. The requests are substantial to accommodate two attached residential units. Two of the requests are side setback reductions from 10 feet to five feet, on the north and south sides of the property. The project as proposed would allow for very minimal visual access to Clearwater Harbor from the East Shore Drive right-of-way. The applicant was asked to consider redesigning the building width to provide greater side setbacks, but a revised submittal still shows the five-foot side setbacks. Both the north and south sides, with very minimal open space land, have retention ponds with a 4:1 slope, making utility maintenance access, building maintenance, and dock construction/maintenance very difficult. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 2 of 9 • • The site is located within the Beach by Design Marina Residential District. Beach by Design promotes significant lot consolidation within the Marina Residential District. The proposal is not consistent with the lot consolidation goal. The lot size and width fall below baseline requirements. The minimum lot width and lot size, per Code, for this site are 100 feet for width and 10,000 square feet for lot area. The proposal includes a reduction of the minimum lot area requirement to 8,171 square feet, and a reduction of the minimum lot width requirement to 60 feet. The lot size and width are contributing factors to this property being too small to support a design that requires excessive compromises. The unit sizes and layout contribute to a building width that is too great for this lot. A five-foot side setback for the north and south sides is too narrow. The applicant might consider "stacking" residential units as an alternative to side-by-side units. Staff does not support this proposal with the lot area, lot width and setbacks as proposed. This project is premature, as the site should be enveloped into a larger parcel to appropriately design a project complying with Code provisions and consistent with the vision of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District. The Marina Residential District calls for "significant lot consolidation", but this site comprises one very small lot. Beach by Design recognizes that small lots are an issue with regard to redevelopment. This shortcoming is viewed as hindering and discouraging the appropriate development and use of adjacent properties. According to Beach by Design, "Pedestrian access should be provided through each block to the intercoastal waterway and terminate at a public boardwalk located along the shoreline from the Causeway to Mandalay Avenue." Pedestrian access will not occur without significant lot consolidation. Numerous deviations from minimum Community Development Code requirements would need to be approved through the Flexible Development process to accommodate the existing design for a building footprint of more than 4,000 square feet and for a proposed building to house more than 8,000 square feet of living space. The applicant has indicated that vehicles can maneuver on site without back-out parking into the public right-of-way. However, a very small pavement area, that could be use for maneuvering space, does not achieve on-site maneuverability without back-out parking. The Community Development Code prohibits back-out parking for any uses other than detached dwellings. City staff has determined that vehicles parked "inside to the wall" within the garages cannot make a turning movement onto the maneuvering space pavement area. In reality, vehicles will back out onto the right-of-way. Further, the small pavement area, intended for maneuvering space, creates a zero front setback. The property at 475 East Shore is the site for the first Flexible Development application in the Beach by Design Marina Residential District. This is a precedent setting application, the first in the Marina Residential District. This application if approved will set a standard and the goal of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District will never be met. The Beach by Design Marina Residential District recognizes the existing small lots and an anticipated development pattern, thus aiming toward the goal to consolidate lots. Although a maximum density of five dwelling units can be placed on this property, and only two dwelling units are proposed, the lot area and width and the goal of the Marina Residential District are the predominant issues. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 3 of 9 • • Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Section 2-803.0 STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 2 dwelling units X DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (five dwelling units maximum IMPERVIOUS 0.78 X SURFACE RATIO (ISR) 0.95 - T LOT AREA (For 0.19 acres; 8,171 square feet X* attached dwellings: 10,000 sq. feet minimum) LOT WIDTH (For 60 feet X* attached dwellings: 100 feet FRONT SETBACK West: zero feet (to pavement) X* 15 feet REAR SETBACK (20 East: zero feet (to pool deck) and 10 X* feet feet (to pool) SIDE SETBACK North: five feet (to building) X* 0-10 feet South: five feet (to building HEIGHT (For 32.33 feet above BFE X attached dwellings: 35 feet) PARKING SPACES 8 spaces (4 spaces per unit) X (1.5 spaces per unit - attached dwellings; threes aces required) (__} * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 4 of 9 • 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.0: Consistent Inconsistent .1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X* development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X* Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X* Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. -a* See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 5 of 9 • • COMPLIANCE WITH GF.NFRAL STANDARnS (Seetinn 3-913)- Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X* adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.19 acre subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District; 2. A building permit for demolition was issued in November 2004 to raze a concrete block motel on this site; 3. Currently, the site is vacant; 4. The maximum permitted density for this site is five dwelling units (based on 30 dwelling units per acre); 5. Adjacent uses are zoned Tourist District; 6. The immediate area is developed with a mixture of attached dwellings and overnight accommodations; 7. The proposed structure height is 32.33 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE); 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this property; 9. The site is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Marina Residential" District; 10. The Beach by Design Marina Residential District restricts height to two stories over ground level parking for the east side of East Shore Drive, for parcels less than 2.5 acres. 11. A goal of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District is to attain significant lot consolidation and pedestrian access through consolidated blocks that terminate at a public boardwalk. The proposal is not consistent with the lot consolidation intent of the Marina Residential District and will ultimately preclude the development of a public bayside boardwalk; 12. The project as proposed would allow for very minimal visual access to Clearwater Harbor from the East Shore Drive Right-of-Way; 13. Both the north and south sides, with very minimal open space land, have retention ponds with a 4:1 slope, making utility maintenance access, building maintenance, and dock construction/maintenance very difficult; Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 6 of 9 0 • 14. Staff finds the proposal does not meet the following General Applicability criteria (Section 3- 913): a) Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The lot size is too small in area and has less than the minimum standard required lot width. No lot consolidation has occurred as part of this proposal, which is inconsistent with Beach by.Design. The bulk and coverage is too much for this site, as setbacks are encroached. The applicant might consider redesigning the project, with stacked dwelling units instead of side-by-side units. b) Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The development as proposed will clearly hinder or discourage appropriate development and use of adjacent land because it will set precedent as the first Flexible Development or Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application in the Marina Residential District setting a standard in direct conflict with the goal and intent of Beach by Design. The development as proposed will consume a parcel without lot consolidation and without providing the coordinated neighborhood design elements of a walkway and a public boardwalk. c) Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The proposed development is inconsistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. There is minimal to no "view scape" due to only 5-foot side setbacks. The proposed building is out of scale to the lot. The intent of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District is to establish a community character whereby parcels are consolidated and pedestrian access is provided to the Intercoastal Waterway and a public boardwalk, aims that are not met by the proposal. 15. Staff finds the proposal does not meet the following Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria (Section 2-803.C): a) The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The proposed building is oversized in scale and bulk for the lot. The unit sizes are substantial and the building design places these large units side-by-side. It is not a matter of the development being impractical without seeking relief from Flexible Development and Comprehensive Infill. b) The development of the parcel proposed for as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal cannot upgrade the immediate vicinity because lot consolidation and the development of a walkway to a public boardwalk have not been proposed, failing to meet the Beach by Design plan for the immediate vicinity which is the Marina Residential District. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 7 of 9 0 0 c) The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. There is no enhancement because the design is seeking too many deviations from the Community Development Code. The residential unit sizes are large at approximately 4,000 square feet each. The building footprint of more than 4,000 square feet is too large in scale and bulk for the 8,171 square foot lot. d) Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The reduction in the side setbacks will result in a building out of scale with the lot on which the building will sit. The applicant has not clearly shown that the flexible development requests provide a benefit to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the property. The mass and scale of the proposed development do not benefit the community character. Adequate view corridors have not been proposed. Recommended Conclusions of Law: 1. The proposal is not consistent with the "Marina Residential District" of Beach by Design as no lot consolidation has occurred or is proposed to occur; 2. As Beach by Design states that, "Pedestrian access should be provided through each block to the intercoastal waterway and terminate at a public boardwalk located along the shoreline from the Causeway to Mandalay Avenue" the proposal does not address the pedestrian access as intended by Beach by Design; 3. The project as proposed would allow for very minimal visual access to Clearwater Harbor from the East Shore Drive Right-of-Way; 4. Both the north and south sides, with very minimal open space land, have retention ponds with a 4:1 slope, making utility maintenance access, building maintenance, and dock construction/maintenance very difficult; 5. As Beach by Design, states that, "Pedestrian access should be provided through each block to the intercoastal waterway and terminate at a public boardwalk located along the shoreline from the Causeway to Mandalay Avenue" the proposal does not address the pedestrian access as intended by Beach by Design; 6. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Project per Section 2-803.C. 1, 5, 6, and 7; and 7. The proposal does not comply with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.1, 2, and 5. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development request to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 square feet to 8,171 square feet, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the side Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 8 of 9 0 9 (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. and Preliminary Plat approval for two lots based upon the above stated recommended findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS : Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending casesl Up for the next CDBIEast Shore 475 Belleair Harbor Townhomes (7) - 9-20-05 CDB - MHRIEast Shore 475 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 9 of 9 0 Sep. 15 2005 03:53PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97813345 Sep.15 03:50PM 03133 SND 10 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX 0435-73291. FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: ?/i', l1? ??l/Gl yt FAX: Phone: FROM: Phone:~? DATE: SUBJECT: /?e , &7- dop MESSAGE: NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) 5 • September 4, 2005 City of Clearwater Community Development Board PO Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl. 33658-4748 RE: CDB meeting/Parkdale LLC Dear Board Members: • 10, 10 2. 1011 ? p1 NEi i> 3 c, I am writing you as Sec/Tres. Of the Sun Harbor Condominium Association which I happen to live in, that is directly to the north of the proposed Parkdale LLC, townhouse development at 475 East Shore Dr., Clearwater Beach, Florida. I moved to the beach some 18 years ago and have watched and participated in the redevelopment throughout this time. As a 10 year member of the Community Development Board and before that the variance board for the City of Clearwater, I have helped Clearwater Beach transform into a vital redevelopment area. I felt I always paid close attention to immediate neighbor's opinions, knowing they have to live next to my decisions. The Homeowners Association and all the members of Sun Harbor Condominium are vehemently opposed to this development at 475 East Shore Dr. We realize that something can be built on this small 60 foot lot and as long as they ask for no setback variances, we are amicable to this redevelopment. But when a developer tries to put ten pounds in a five pound bag we are opposed. What has happened to view corridors, impervious surface, and setbacks from sea walls? We DO NOT want another Brightwater Drive on East Shore. Parkdale is requesting numerous variances and in fact all the way around the building they are proposing they are requesting variances. But they are NOT considering what is built already. We, at Sun Harbor, have a 30 foot side setback from our north and south property lines, to provide a view corridor of the water. We could have built at a 10 foot setback. Parkdale has a 10 foot side setback requirement but are requesting 5 feet, TO CLOSE to us. We have a 30 foot rear setback from the water; Parkdale has a 20 foot setback requirement but is requesting ZERO setbacks to build a pool deck. What about our views to the south? Parkdale knew the rules when they bought this substandard lot. Now they are requesting that the CDB bend those rules for them to build what they want. All we are asking is for Parkdale to live by those rules and build with no variances. We at Sun Harbor, realize that they paid an astronomical amount of money for this substandard lot and they need to build a large building on this lot to recoup their investment. Butthat is not our problem. Has Parkdale once requested a meeting with any of its neighbors? NO!!!! We know why • because they are afraid of what we might say if we saw their plan. Well we have seen their plan and DO NOT like it. Parkdale was hoping that no neighbors would see this plan and this would just sail through the CDB. Not this time. Set the standard for East Shore Drive and make Parkdale build within the rules as set forth by the building codes. We are well beyond the point when the rules were bent to stimulate re-development of Clearwater Beach, redevelopment has arrived. Now you on the CDB must set the standards higher to build quality redevelopments to ensure that Clearwater Beach is the Gold Standard in years to come. Sincerely yo , Bill Jo n Sun H or Condominium 479 East Shore Dr. #1 Clearwater, Fl. 33767 0 Sep. 12 2005 01:43PM YOUR LOGO City0fClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97813345 Sep.12 01:42PM 01'04 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). Aug, 13. 2005 10:45AM .i' " Description of Requests No. 6879 P. 2 The proposed requests are as Follows: 1, A reduction of the minimum lot area from 10,000sf to the existing lot of record area of 8,171 s£ 2. A reduction of the Minimum lot width from 100' to the existing lot width of 60'. 3. A reduction of the Side Setbacks from 10' to 5. 4. A reduction of the rear setback of 20' to 0' to brick paver pool deck extending to seawall cap and 10' to pool structure wall. Please note the building will meet the required 20' setback at a minimum setback of 22.9', average 25.7' due to the trapezoidal shape of the property. Aug, 18. 2005 10.44AM 16 x-31554 US Highway 18 North Palm Harbor, FL 34884 Ph 727 787.4ee4 Fax 727 781.3345 L eM;a To-s Paxi? Pages: '2- Phones Darts: Re: C vt J CCI ®nt © For Review L7 Please Cornment Q Please Reply El Please Recycle 3a9?- No. 6879 P. 1 I Ass0. iate$, Inc. Prom: Bret Krasman, P.E. I The Inlbnnatlon contained In this fax is Intended only for the person or e" to whom it is addressed and may contain oonfidentlal and/or Privileged meterlal. If you have received this fax in error, please note that any review, retransmission, copying, distribution or other use of the fax ! Is prohlblted,.li you are notan Intended recipient, please destroy the material and contact Krasman & Associates, Inc. 4 the above number. Thank you for your cooperation. ORIGINAL Krasman & Associates, Inc. 31564 US 19 North Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 Phone (727) 787-4684 Fax (727) 781-3345 August 10, 2005 City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave, 2"d Floor Clearwater, Florida 33756 i , Attn: Mike Reynolds a Re: Belleair Harbor Townhomes ?.. FLD 2005-06056 & PLT 2005-00015 475 East Shore Drive Dear Mr. Reynolds: The following is in response to the August 8th DRC Comments for the above referenced project: General Engineering 1. Individual Sewer laterals shall be provided for each unit. Response: Acknowledged, see revised plans. 2. Individual water service to be provided for each unit. Response: Acknowledged, see revised plans. 3. Provide a 4 ft. concrete sidewalk along East Shore Drive. (Development Code Section 3-1701 and 3-1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30) Response: Acknowledged, see revised plans. 4. The proposed connection of the two driveways shall not be in the public right-of= way. Response: Acknowledged, see revised plans. 5. Provide 4 "fire line to the rear of property. 0 • ORIGINAL Response: Acknowledged, see revised plans. All the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit.) 1. Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of--way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6 " x 6 10 x 10 w.w.m [sidewalks shall not be constructed within this apron area(s)]. (Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30) Response: See General Construction Note 32, Sheet 2. 2. Final Plat must be recorded with Pinellas County prior to a building permit being issued for any vertical construction. (Development Code 4-708) Response: Acknowledged. Please Note-A separate permit must be submitted for the construction of any new cq k ? I structure. U _ 1 Response: Acknowledged. Qi l j I j 2C.3 Fire: RLA 1. ***Please Note*** Review and approval by the authority having jurisdiction shall not relieve the applicant of the responsibility of compliance with the Florida fire prevention code 2004 Edition. This DRC review by fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR to CDB. Response: Acknowledged. 2. Provide and show on the site plane afire hydrant within 300 ft and on the same side of the street PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged, see revised plans. 3. This property will have to be protected by afire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged, See General Construction Note 32, Sheet 2. 4. Provide and show on the site plan the FDC. Located at least 1 S off the building and within 40 feet of the fire hydrant dedication to the fire sprinkler system PRIOR TO CDB. 0 0 ORIGINAL Response: Acknowledged, see revised plans, Sheet 5. 5. Provide and show on the site plan a standpipe water supply with 2 '/z inch connection and 1 '/z inch adaptor with breakable cover or and chain within 100 feet of any pier/land intersection for the docks as per NFPA-303, PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged, see revised plans, Sheet 5. 6. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged, See General Construction Note 29, Sheet 2. Fire Department Connection shall be identified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection " and shall be designed in accordance with Florida department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with clearance of 7'/z feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire prevention code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge PRIOR to CDB. Response: Acknowledged, See General Construction Note 30, Sheet 2. 8. Clearance of 7'/z feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA- 1. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Response: Acknowledged, See General Construction Note 31, Sheet 2. Harbor Master: No comments Legal: No comments Land Resources: Show the two palm trees at the SE corner to be preserved prior to Building Permit. Response: Acknowledged, See revised plans. Landscaping: 1D?._?C[???11??r A1la 1 ZC'3 j. C.:',, i. .. --.. . • No comments Parks and Recreation: • ORIGINAL 1. A recreation facility impact fee of'$200 is due.for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plant (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727- 562-4824. Note: Need verification of number of units in recently demolished motel in order to give correct credit for residential units. Response: Acknowledged, Per conversation with Art Kader there were 7 existing Motel units a fee of $50 is required. Stormwater• No Issues Solid Waste: 1. That Solid Waste and Recycling service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn 727-562-4930 Response: Acknowledged. Traffic Engineering: 1. Dimension driveway width and length Response: Acknowledged, See Revised Plan. 2. Show 20'x 20'sight visibility triangles at the driveways. (City's Community Development Code Section 3-904). Response: Acknowledged, See Revised Plan. 3. Provide new, upgraded or repaired sidewalks compliant with City Code and ADA standards. (Development Code Section: 3-1701) Response: Acknowledged, See Revised Plan. General Note: A transportation impact_fee of'$2,840.00 (2 units x $14207tinit) to be paid prior to a C.O. Response: Acknowledged. Planning: 0 Ell J U 2-? ,..,ACS 0 0 ORIGINAL 1. 1. Part of the written request on the application form needs clarification/completion relative to the rear setback. Response: See revised narrative, Per the DRC Discussion the requested setback to the pool is 1.0'. The setback to the building is 22.9'. 2. How was density computed? Submerged lands cannot be used to compute density. Response: Per the DRC Discussion this was shown on the cover sheet of the previously submitted plans. The acreage times 30 Unites per acre yields 5.7 units allowable. 3. The unit/building mass seem large and oversized for this property, as not enough space was allowed for setbacks and parking. Driveway design shows backout parking. Response: Per the DRC Discussion, the building front and rear setbacks are greater than the minimum allowable. The required parking is 3 spaces, the design as shown provides 8 spaces. The design as shown does not include backout parking; there is a shared turnaround in front of the building. 4. The site plan needs labels with dimensional arrows to indicate setback distance from the rear to any structures. Label all structures. Response: See revised plan. 5. Written narrative composition needs expansion and clear statements with reasons for all requests. Response: See revised narrative. 2. Clarify why comprehensive Infill review is requested. Response: See revised narrative. 3. The request needs to include back-out parking. Response: Per the DRC discussion this is no longer an issue there is a turn around provided in front of the building. 4. The application needs to provide a justification.for the setback requests, and ? address the criteria in a detailed narrative. P M, ?I tN`` J IN .. i Response: See revised narrative. t ly JLJ A Ply, u._ ..... _ 1CS? ('4 f't OF CU.-, r .... ? ORIGINAL 5. The preliminary plat drawing needs to state the lot size in square feet and acreage for each lot, labeled. Also provide labeling.for the width. Response: See revised preliminary plat. 6. What is the elevation for the swimming pools? Response: See revised plan. 7. The site plan does not show a dock or indicate any intention regarding of same. Response: The plan showed the existing dock to be removed and reconstructed on Sheet 3 and also noted on sheet 5. The dock will be removed and reconstructed. Plat General Engineering 1. Provide legal description on plat. Response: See revised plat. 2. Provide names, appropriately positioned of adjacent plats. Response: See revised plat. 3. Provide area of overall plat and each lot. Response: See revised plat. 4. Developer is providing a common entrance for use by both property owners. What provision will be made on plat to accommodate this common area? Response: See revised plat. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Krasman & Associates, Inc. Bret Krasman, P.E. CC: 05032 U AU G' 1 ? K'- 1 ?} i FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 TO: FAX: (727) 562-4865 FAX: ?- Phone: FROM: 1&ct ,fc)k1& Phone: DATE: SUBJECT: &e2 MESSAGE: it `ll ¢ ib/ //_ '?_? G??•-. Ui)le-J? Zvaf- NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAG 11.05 and Case Number: FLD2005-060 056 -- 475 EAST SHORE DR Owner(s): Parkdale Llc Po Box 17660 Clearwater, F133762 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Belleair Harbor, Llc Po Box 514 Indian Rocks Beach, F13 TELEPHONE: 727-420-5664, FAX: 517-1747, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Bret Krasman 31564 Us 19 N Palm Harbor, Fl 34684 TELEPHONE: 727-787-4684, FAX: 727-781-3345, E-MAIL: bret@krasengr.com Location: 0.19 acres located on the east side of East Shore Drive, approximately 300 feet south of the intersection of East Shore Drive and Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval request for a reduction of the side (northand south) setbacks from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction in the rear setback (request needs clarification), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 2 lots and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program application under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Coral Resort Condominum Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 483 E Shore Drive TELEPHONE: 727-446-3711, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: coral483@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamutphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Mike Reynolds, Scott Rice, Anne Blackburn, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Individual sewer laterals shall be provide for each unit. 2) Individual water service to be provided for each unit. 3) Provide a 4 ft. concrete sidewalk along East Shore Drive. (Development Code Sections 3-1701 and 3-1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30) 4) The proposed connection of the two driveways shall not be in the public right-of-way. 5) Provide 4" fire line to the rear of property. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1) Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. [sidewalks shall not to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. (Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30) 2) Final Plat must be recorded with Pinellas County prior to a Building Permit being issued for any vertical construction. (Development Code 4-708) General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 24 0 0 Please Note - A separate permit must be submitted for the construction of any new dock structure. Fire: 1 , ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2. Provide and show on the site plan a fire hydrant within 300 ft and on the same side of the street PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . This property will have to be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Provide and show on the site plan the FDC, located at least 15 off the building and within 40 feet of the fire hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide and show on the site plan a standpipe water supply with 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cov er and chain within 100 feet of any pier/land intersection for the docks as per NFPA-303, PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Fire Deparatment Connection shall be identified by a sign that staes'No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . Clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the firehydrant, with a 4 foot cleaarance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknoweldge PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: 1 . Show the two palm trees at the SE corner to be preserved prior to Building Permit. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Note: Need verification of number of units in recently demolished motel in order to give correct credit for residential units. Stormwater: No Issues Solid Waste: 1 . That Solid Waste & Recycling service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 Traffic Engineering: 1 . Dimension driveway width and length. 2. Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 3. Provide new, upgraded or repaired sidewalks compliant with City Code and ADA standards. (Development Code Section: 3-1701) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note : A transportation impact fee of $2,840.00 (2 units x $1420/unit) to be paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 25 • • Planning: 1 . 1. Part of the written request on the application form needs clarification/completion relative to the rear setback. 2. How was density computed? Submerged lands cannot be used to compute density. 3. The units/building mass seem large and oversized for this property, as not enough space was allowed for setbacks and parking. Driveway design shows backout parking. 4. The site plan needs labels with dimensional arrows to indicate setback distances from the rear to any structures. Label all structures. 5. Written narrative composition needs expansion and clear statements with reasons for all requests. 2. Clarify why Comprehensive Infill review is requested. 3 . The request needs to include back-out parking. 4 . The application needs to provide a justification for the setback requests, and address the criteria in a detailed narrative. 5 . The preliminary plat drawing needs to state the lote size in square feet and acreage for each lot, labled. Also provide lableing for the width. 6. What is the elevation for the swimming pools? 7. The site plan does not show a dock or indicate any intention regarding of same. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 26 11:05 am • Case Number: PLT2005-00015 -- 475 EAST SHORE DR Owner(s): Parkdale Llc Po Box 17660 Clearwater, Fl 33762 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: Applicant Belleair Harbor, Llc Po Box 514 Indian Rocks Beach, F13 TELEPHONE: 727-420-5664, Representative: Bret Krasman 31564 Us 19 N 0 No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email FAX: 517-1747, E-MAIL: No Email Palm Harbor, F134684 TELEPHONE: 727-787-4684, FAX: 727-781-3345, E-MAIL: bret@krasengr.com Location: Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Proposed Use: Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Provide legal description on preliminary plat. 2) Provide names, appropriately positioned, of adjacent plats. 3) Provide area of the overall plat and each lot. 4) Developer is providing a common entrance for use by both property owners. will be made on plat to accommodate this common area? Environmental: No Comments Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments What provision Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Note: Need verification of number of units in recently demolished motel in order to give correct credit for residential units. Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: I . No issues. Planning: No Comments Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 27 Other: No Comments Notes: 0 0 0 Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 28 Aug. 01 2005 04:07PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97813345 Aug.01 04:05PM 01'47 SND 06 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 0 ? 1 i,.-": LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 6, 2005 CITY OF C LEAR ATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 Mr. Bret Krasman. P.E. 31564 US Highway 19 N Palm Harbor, Florida 34684 SUBJECT: FLD2005-06056; 475 East Shore Drive; Letter of Completeness Dear Mr. Krasman: After a preliminary review of your application submittal materials, your application has been determined to be complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will consider your application for sufficiency on August 4, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room (216) at 100 South Myrtle Avenue. Please contact Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727- 562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for your approximate agenda time. You or your representative must be present at this meeting. If you have any question, please contact me at tel. # 727-562-4836 or mike.reynoldsgmyclearwater. com Sincerely, A014f4..e /? Michael H. Reynolds, AICP Planner III S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next DRCIEast Shore 475 Belleair Harbor Townhomes (T) - MHRICompleteness letter.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILI. JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL MEMBER HOYT HAMIFFON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCR.MEMBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATP/li ACTION EMPLOYER" 0 CDB Meeting Date: Case Numbers: Agenda Item: Owners: Applicant: Representative: Address: 0 September 20, 2005 FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 F13 Parkdale, LLC Belleair Harbor, LLC Mr. Bret Krasman, PE; Krasman and Associates 475 East Shore Drive CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 square feet to 8,171 square feet, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. and Preliminary Plat approval for two lots. EXISTING ZONING/ Tourist (T) District LAND USE: Residential Facilities High (RFH) Category PROPERTY SIZE: 0.19 acres PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units) ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Tourist District; Attached dwellings LAND USES: East: Preservation District; Clearwater Harbor South: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations (motel) West: Tourist District; Overnight accommodations (motel) Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 1 of 9 0 0 CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is a mixture of attached dwellings, detached dwellings and overnight accommodation uses. Clearwater Harbor is to the east. The site is walking distance to Clearwater Beach and the Gulf of Mexico. ANel.vcrC- Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.19 acres is located on the east side of East Shore Drive, approximately 300 feet south of the intersection of East Shore Drive and Baymont Street. The site is vacant and is fronted by Clearwater Harbor to the east and East Shore Drive to the west. The East Shore Resort motel is to the south. An attached residential unit building is located to the north. According to City records, a building permit for demolition was issued in November 2004 to raze a concrete block motel on this site. Records indicate that seven rental units were housed on this property. The parcel is zoned Tourist (T) District. This property is relatively flat. East Shore Drive is a north - south street, parallel to the Poinsettia Avenue and Mandalay Avenue which are heavily traveled north - south corridors to the west. East Shore Drive is frequented by both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Adjacent uses are located within the Tourist Zoning District. Surrounding land uses include overnight accommodations, attached dwellings, retail, and restaurants. Proposal: The proposal includes constructing two attached dwellings in a building with two living floors over one level of parking. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 square feet to 8,171 square feet, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way. A preliminary plat application has also been made for two lots. The proposed building height is 32.33 feet above Base Flood Elevation (BFE), which conforms to code. The Beach by Design Marina Residential District restricts height to two stories over ground level parking for the east side of East Shore Drive, for parcels less than 2.5 acres. The application is seeking eight approvals to vary from the Community Development Code. The requests are substantial to accommodate two attached residential units. Two of the requests are side setback reductions from 10 feet to five feet, on the north and south sides of the property. The project as proposed would allow for very minimal visual access to Clearwater Harbor from the East Shore Drive right-of-way. The applicant was asked to consider redesigning the building width to provide greater side setbacks, but a revised submittal still shows the five-foot side setbacks. Both the north and south sides, with very minimal open space land, have retention ponds with a 4:1 slope, making utility maintenance access, building maintenance, and dock construction/maintenance very difficult. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 2 of 9 0 • The site is located within the Beach by Design Marina Residential District. Beach by Design promotes significant lot consolidation within the Marina Residential District. The proposal is not consistent with the lot consolidation goal. The lot size and width fall below baseline requirements. The minimum lot width and lot size, per Code, for this site are 100 feet for width and 10,000 square feet for lot area. The proposal includes a reduction of the minimum lot area requirement to 8,171 square feet, and a reduction of the minimum lot width requirement to 60 feet. The lot size and width are contributing factors to this property being too small to support a design that requires excessive compromises. The unit sizes and layout contribute to a building width that is too great for this lot. A five-foot side setback for the north and south sides is too narrow. The applicant might consider "stacking" residential units as an alternative to side-by-side units. Staff does not support this proposal with the lot area, lot width and setbacks as proposed. This project is premature, as the site should be enveloped into a larger parcel to appropriately design a project complying with Code provisions and consistent with the vision of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District. The Marina Residential District calls for "significant lot consolidation", but this site comprises one very small lot. Beach by Design recognizes that small lots are an issue with regard to redevelopment. This shortcoming is viewed as hindering and discouraging the appropriate development and use of adjacent properties. According to Beach by Design, "Pedestrian access should be provided through each block to the intercoastal waterway and terminate at a public boardwalk located along the shoreline from the Causeway to Mandalay Avenue." Pedestrian access will not occur without significant lot consolidation. Numerous deviations from minimum Community Development Code requirements would need to be approved through the Flexible Development process to accommodate the existing design for a building footprint of more than 4,000 square feet and for a proposed building to house more than 8,000 square feet of living space. The applicant has indicated that vehicles can maneuver on site without back-out parking into the public right-of-way. However, a very small pavement area, that could be use for maneuvering space, does not achieve on-site maneuverability without back-out parking. The Community Development Code prohibits back-out parking for any uses other than detached dwellings. City staff has determined that vehicles parked "inside to the wall" within the garages cannot make a turning movement onto the maneuvering space pavement area. In reality, vehicles will back out onto the right-of-way. Further, the small pavement area, intended for maneuvering space, creates a zero front setback. The property at 475 East Shore is the site for the first Flexible Development application in the Beach by Design Marina Residential District. This is a precedent setting application, the first in the Marina Residential District. This application if approved will set a standard and the goal of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District will never be met. The Beach by Design Marina Residential District recognizes the existing small lots and an anticipated development pattern, thus aiming toward the goal to consolidate lots. Although a maximum density of five dwelling units can be placed on this property, and only two dwelling units are proposed, the lot area and width and the goal of the Marina Residential District are the predominant issues. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 3 of 9 # 0 Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: Section 2-803.0 STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAXIMUM 2 dwelling units X DENSITY (30 dwelling units per acre) (five dwelling units maximum) IMPERVIOUS 0.78 X SURFACE RATIO ISR 0.95 - T LOT AREA (For 0.19 acres; 8,171 square feet X* attached dwellings: 10,000 sq. feet minimum LOT WIDTH (For 60 feet X* attached dwellings: 100 feet FRONT SETBACK West: zero feet (to pavement) X* 15 feet REAR SETBACK (20 East: zero feet (to pool deck) and 10 X* feet feet (to pool) SIDE SETBACK North: five feet (to building) X* 0-10 feet) South: five feet to building) HEIGHT (For 32.33 feet above BFE X attached dwellings: 35 feet) PARKING SPACES 8 spaces (4 spaces per unit) X (1.5 spaces per unit - attached dwellings; threes aces required) f84 * See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 4 of 9 0 0 COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-803.0: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X* development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X* Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X* Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X* street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. -9* See discussion under Analysis. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 5 of 9 0 • COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X* adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. * See discussion under Analysis. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.19 acre subject property is located within the Tourist (T) District; 2. A building permit for demolition was issued in November 2004 to raze a concrete block motel on this site; 3. Currently, the site is vacant; 4. The maximum permitted density for this site is five dwelling units (based on 30 dwelling units per acre); 5. Adjacent uses are zoned Tourist District; 6. The immediate area is developed with a mixture of attached dwellings and overnight accommodations; 7. The proposed structure height is 32.33 feet from Base Flood Elevation (BFE); 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with this property; 9. The site is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Marina Residential" District; 10. The Beach by Design Marina Residential District restricts height to two stories over ground level parking for the east side of East Shore Drive, for parcels less than 2.5 acres. 11. A goal of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District is to attain significant lot consolidation and pedestrian access through consolidated blocks that terminate at a public boardwalk. The proposal is not consistent with the lot consolidation intent of the Marina Residential District and will ultimately preclude the development of a public bayside boardwalk; 12. The project as proposed would allow for very minimal visual access to Clearwater Harbor from the East Shore Drive Right-of-Way; 13. Both the north and south sides, with very minimal open space land, have retention ponds with a 4:1 slope, making utility maintenance access, building maintenance, and dock construction/maintenance very difficult; Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 6 of 9 14. Staff finds the proposal does not meet the following General Applicability criteria (Section 3- 913): a) Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. The lot size is too small in area and has less than the minimum standard required lot width. No lot consolidation has occurred as part of this proposal, which is inconsistent with Beach by Design. The bulk and coverage is too much for this site, as setbacks are encroached. The applicant might consider redesigning the project, with stacked dwelling units instead of side-by-side units. b) Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The development as proposed will clearly hinder or discourage appropriate development and use of adjacent land because it will set precedent as the first Flexible Development or Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment application in the Marina Residential District setting a standard in direct conflict with the goal and intent of Beach by Design. The development as proposed will consume a parcel without lot consolidation and without providing the coordinated neighborhood design elements of a walkway and a public boardwalk. c) Development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. The proposed development is inconsistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. There is minimal to no "view scape" due to only 5-foot side setbacks. The proposed building is out of scale to the lot. The intent of the Beach by Design Marina Residential District is to establish a community character whereby parcels are consolidated and pedestrian access is provided to the Intercoastal Waterway and a public boardwalk, aims that are not met by the proposal. 15. Staff finds the proposal does not meet the following Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria (Section 2-803.C): a) The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. The proposed building is oversized in scale and bulk for the lot. The unit sizes are substantial and the building design places these large units side-by-side. It is not a matter of the development being impractical without seeking relief from Flexible Development and Comprehensive Infill. b) The development of the parcel proposed for as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposal cannot upgrade the immediate vicinity because lot consolidation and the development of a walkway to a public boardwalk have not been proposed, failing to meet the Beach by Design plan for the immediate vicinity which is the Marina Residential District. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 7 of 9 • • c) The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. There is no enhancement because the design is seeking too many deviations from the Community Development Code. The residential unit sizes are large at approximately 4,000 square feet each. The building footprint of more than 4,000 square feet is too large in scale and bulk for the 8,171 square foot lot. d) Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The reduction in the side setbacks will result in a building out of scale with the lot on which the building will sit. The applicant has not clearly shown that the flexible development requests provide a benefit to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the property. The mass and scale of the proposed development do not benefit the community character. Adequate view corridors have not been proposed. Recommended Conclusions of Law: 1. The proposal is not consistent with the "Marina Residential District" of Beach by Design as no lot consolidation has occurred or is proposed to occur; 2. As Beach by Design states that, "Pedestrian access should be provided through each block to the intercoastal waterway and terminate at a public boardwalk located along the shoreline from the Causeway to Mandalay Avenue" the proposal does not address the pedestrian access as intended by Beach by Design; 3. The project as proposed would allow for very minimal visual access to Clearwater Harbor from the East Shore Drive Right-of-Way; 4. Both the north and south sides, with very minimal open space land, have retention ponds with a 4:1 slope, making utility maintenance access, building maintenance, and dock construction/maintenance very difficult; 5. As Beach by Design, states that, "Pedestrian access should be provided through each block to the intercoastal waterway and terminate at a public boardwalk located along the shoreline from the Causeway to Mandalay Avenue" the proposal does not address the pedestrian access as intended by Beach by Design; 6. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Project per Section 2-803.C. 1, 5, 6, and 7; and 7. The proposal does not comply with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.1, 2, and 5. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development request to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 square feet to 8,171 square feet, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 feet to 60 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the side Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 8 of 9 • (south) setback from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 feet to zero feet (to pool deck) and from 20 feet to 10 feet (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. and Preliminary Plat approval for two lots based upon the above stated recommended findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff. A7" -WL-? -v- a?? Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmenllC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next CDBIEast Shore 475 Belleair Harbor Townhomes (T) - 9-20-05 CDB - MHRIEast Shore 475 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-06056/PLT2005-00015 - Page 9 of 9 Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC LTqWS -- Dc?o , 05 Case No. L 005 , Meeting Date: Location: ? Current Use: ?C1(L 1 ? Active Code Enforcement Case (no e ? Address number (yes) (no) ? Landscaping es (no) reekaJ ? Overgrown (yes) ? Debris (yes) no ? Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) no) ? Building(s) (good) (fair) (poor) scant Ian ) ? Fencing on ) (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ,ji?- Paint (good) (fair) (poor) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes) Q ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) oo ? Signage one (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) ee s repavin Dumpster (enclosed) (not enclosed) ? -Outdoor storage (yes) Rio Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): 8,I , !_.1 a i I Date: 793 oS Reviewed by: ffiz c D Telephone: 14 `7z? Revised OS-29-01; 02-04-03 Reynolds, Mike From: Rice, Scott Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:59 PM To: Reynolds, Mike Subject: FLD2005-06056 - 475 East Shore Mike, Engineering has completed review of the resubmittal for the subject case and updated Permit Plan. Approval conditions: Final Plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County prior to issuance of a building permit. Transportation impact fee to be determined and paid prior to C.O. It is not an engineering issue, but I believe the side setbacks are too narrow. D. Scott Rice Land Devel. Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com e 1 14-V AIX/ ..,a 6 • Case Number: FLD2005-06056 -- 475 EAST SHORE DR Owner(s): Parkdale Llc Po Box 17660 Clearwater, Fl 33762 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Belleair Harbor, Llc Po Box 514 Indian Rocks Beach, F13 TELEPHONE: 727-420-5664, FAX: 517-1747, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Bret Krasman 31564 Us 19 N Palm Harbor, Fl 34684 TELEPHONE: 727-787-4684, FAX: 727-781-3345, E-MAIL: bret@krasengr.com Location: 0.19 acres located on the east side of East Shore Drive, approximately 300 feet south of the intersection of East Shore Drive and Baymont Street. Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval request for a reduction of the side (northand south) setbacks from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction in the rear setback (request needs clarification), as a Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 2 lots and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program application under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Coral Resort Condominum Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 483 E Shore Drive . TELEPHONE: 727-446-3711, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: cora1483@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Mike Reynolds, Scott Rice, Anne Blackburn, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Individual sewer laterals shall be provide for each unit. 2) Individual water service to be provided for each unit. 3) Provide a 4 ft. concrete sidewalk along East Shore Drive. (Development Code Sections 3-1701 and 3-1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30) 4) The proposed connection of the two driveways shall not be in the public right-of-way. 5) Provide 4" fire line to the rear of property. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: 1) Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. [sidewalks shall not to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. (Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30) 2) Final Plat must be recorded with Pinellas County prior to a Building Permit being issued for any vertical construction. (Development Code 4-708) General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: Please Note - A separate permit must be submitted for the construction of any new dock structure. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 57 i • Fire: I , ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. . 2. Provide and show on the site plan a fire hydrant within 300 ft and on the same side of the street PRIOR TO CDB. 3. This property will have to be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Provide and show on the site plan the FDC, located at least 15 off the building and within 40 feet of the fire hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system PRIOR TO CDB. 5. Provide and show on the site plan a standpipe water supply with 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cov er and chain within 100 feet of any pier/land intersection for the docks as per NFPA-303, PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Fire Deparatment Connection shall be identified by a sign that staes 'No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 8. Clearance of 7 1 /2 feet in front of and to the sides of the firehydrant, with a 4 foot cleaarance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknoweldge PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I , Show the two palm trees at the SE corner to be preserved prior to Building Permit. Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: Stormwater: Solid Waste: A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Note: Need verification of number of units in recently demolished motel in order to give correct credit for residential units. No Issues That Solid Waste & Recycling service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 Traffic Engineering: 1 , Dimension driveway width and length. 2. Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 3. Provide new, upgraded or repaired sidewalks compliant with City Code and ADA standards. (Development Code Section: 3-1701) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: General Note : A transportation impact fee of $2,840.00 (2 units x $1420/unit) to be paid prior to a C.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 58 r • 1. Part of the written request on the application form needs clarification/completion relative to the rear setback. Notes: 2. How was density computed? Submerged lands cannot be used to compute density. 3. The units/building mass seem large and oversized for this property, as not enough space was allowed for setbacks and parking. Driveway design shows backout parking. 4. The site plan needs labels with dimensional arrows to indicate setback distances from the rear to any structures. Label all structures. 5. Written narrative composition needs expansion and clear statements with reasons for all requests. Other: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 59 • Case Number: PLT2005-00015 -- 475 EAST SHORE DR V Owner(s): Applicant Representative: ParkdaleLlc Po Box 17660 Clearwater, Fl 33762 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email r Belleair Harbor, Llc Po Box 514 Indian Rocks Beach, Fl 3 TELEPHONE: 727-420-5664, FAX: 517-1747, E-MAIL: No Email Bret Krasman 31564 Us 19 N Palm Harbor, Fl 34684 TELEPHONE: 727-787-4684, FAX: 727-781-3345, E-MAIL: bret@krasengr.com Location: Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Proposed Use: Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F] 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Planner III Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 , 1) Provide legal description on preliminary plat. 2) Provide names, appropriately positioned, of adjacent plats. 3) Provide area of the overall plat and each lot. 4) Developer is providing a common entrance for use by both property owners. What provision will be made on plat to accommodate this common area? Environmental: No Comments Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Note: Need verification of number of units in recently demolished motel in order to give correct credit for residential units. Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . No issues. Planning: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 55 Other: No Comments Notes: 40 Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 56 0 46 Map Request Planner Name: Mike Reynolds Case Number: FLD2005-06056 Date Requested: August 31, 2005 Date Requested for: September 6, 2005 Maps Needed ® Aerial Photograph ? Proposed Annexation ® Existing Surrounding Uses Basemap ® Location Map ® Zoning/Flexible Development Map ? 2" x 2" Location Map for Newspaper ® Future Land Use Required Documents ® Legal Description ® Survey ® Map with Proposed Site Highlighted Maps Request Owner: Parkdale, LLC Case: FLD2005-06056 Site: 475 East Shore Drive Property Size(Acres): 0.19 acres PIN: 08/29/15/16434/003/0050 Atlas Page: 267A Pinellas County Property Apprr Information: 08 29 15 16434 003 00? Page 2 of 3 ,.:._ 03 1 29 1 15 / 10434 1 003 1 0050 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFR Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:19:17 Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales PARKDALE LLC ?BK: 13836 OPG: 0933 PO BOX 17660 CLEARWATER FL 33762-0660 EVRC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Rddr: 0 of Jan 1, 2005, based on Census Tract: 260.02 2003 2004 l f - : sa es rom 0 Sale Date ?R Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /2,004 13,836/ 933 925,000 (Q) I 1937: Book 021 Pgs 021- 1 /1,990 7,173/1,088 150,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 11,972 3,7291 690 77,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,971 3,542/ 119 65,000 (Q) I 2005 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 701,300 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exam: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap; 701,300 Institutional Exam: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exam: 0 Taxable: 701,300 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 05 Millage: 23.2372 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 9,665.52 1) 60 x 137 100.00 8,250.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2005 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 16, 296. 25 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2005 taxes will be 16, 296.25 Short Legal CLEARWATER BEACH PARK 1ST ADD R EPLAT Description BLK C, LOT 5 & SUBMERGED LAND E TO CHANNEL Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=08+29+15+1... 8/31/2005 Pinellas County Property Apprr Information: 08 29 15 16434 003 00? P operty and Umd_Use Code descriptions 03 1 29 1 15 1 10434 I 003 / 31-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 10:19:16 Vacant Parcel Property Use; 000 Land Use; 10 0050 Page 3 of 3 Vacant ExTra F?a turves Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year s) 00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 9) .00 0 0 0 0 4)' 00 0 0 0 0 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=08+29+15+1... 8/31/2005 A 6 .0 ?? W'A' FLD2005-02023 ? " /1---? 4A- CT),r ? 111 KENWOOD AVE 1z ?e(? , Legal l Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 04/15/2005 3/22/05 - WW Met No issues. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 562-4741 03/14/2005 4/18/05-The tree will now be removed, no revisions required. Met 3/14/05-Show the proposed grades of the driveway adjacent to thr 30" oak tree. Try to place concrete "on grade" to avoid root loss. 03/14/2005 4/18/05-The tree will now be removed, no revisions required. Met 3/14/05-Show the irrigation to be placed farther east, adjacent to the driveway, to prevent root damage to the 30" oak tree. 03/14/2005 Show the 9" oak tree to be removed. The sanitary connection is too close to allow this tree to Met survive. Show required 9" of replacements on the landscape plan. Also show one additional replacement tree as required on a previous tree permit (BCP2004-01387). 03/14/2005 4/18/05-The tree will now be removed, no revisions required. Not Met 3/14/05-Show the proposed grades of the sidewalk adjacent to the 30" oak tree. Try to place concrete "on grade" to avoid root loss. Parks & Recs Condition Initials Missing Initials Missing 03/19/2005 No Issues - A recreation Facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to Not Met issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occures first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Storm Water Condition Jason Kinney 562-4747 ext 2604 03/21/2005 1. Applicant is advised that City of Clearwater typically does not require retention for a duplex Met and may be omitted from development for building permit, providing that other regulatory agencies are granting approval. 4/13/05 - ACKNOWLEDGED 2. Prior to building permit, provide a SWFWMD Permit or letter of No Permit Required. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 03/11/2005 1. Show correct 20' x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveway. (Community Development Code, Met Section 3-904). 4/13/05 - MET 2. Provide City standard parking stalls. Parking stalls must be 19' long not 18'. (Community Development Code Section 3-1402) 4/13/05 - MET 3. Motorists line of sight must be clear when backing out of outside parking stalls (4 ft. wood fence shown on plans). 4/13105 - MET All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. 4/13/05 - MET General note: Transportation Impact Fees of (2du x $1,400/du=$2,800.00) to be paid prior to C.O. Zoning Condition Wayne Wells 562-4504 03/07/2005 3/1/05 - WW Met Complete the application by filling in the following: Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a Print Date: 07/06/2005 CaseConditons Page 3 of 7 FLD2005-06056, (162) 414 ABOOD, ROBERT G ACHARYA, RAVINDRA P 1'1ERY, JOSEPHINE ABOOD, CATHERINE C ACHARYA, KALPANA R ULINE, BRADLEY R 4 OAKLEAF CT 47 SAWMILL RD 521 MANDALAY AVE # 704 SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - DUDLEY MA 01571 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - B J E INC BABCOCK, SUSAN BANNAN, JOHN N 630 S GULFVIEW BLVD PO BOX 801 BANNAN, SUSAN M CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2642 OZONA FL 34660 - 5674 WENDY CIR LOCKPORT NY 14094 - 6015 BELLE HARBOR OWNERS ASSN INC BELLE HARBOR Belleair Harbor, LLC 501 MANDALAY AVE 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 PO Box 514 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785 BERG, ANNA JACOBSEN BICZ, DANIEL S BODUCH, RAYMOND T 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1409 BICZ, MARGARET C BODUCH, LINDA C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 521 MANDALAY AVE # 802 521 MANDALAY AVE # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 BOMERGER, DAVID RICHARD BOND, GEORGE L JR BOTWICK, ANDREW L 990 W OAK ST BOND, YVONNE N BOTWICK, DIANNE S ZIONSVILLE IN 46077 - 1215 CAMINO CAPISTRANO 1422 NW 111TH AVE ROSEVILLE CA 95747 - CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 - BRANDENBURGH, JOAN THE Bret Krasman, P.E. CAMBAS, NICHOLAS A 1048 IDLEWILD DR S Krasman and Associates 2939 ELYSIUM WAY DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3105 31564 US 19 North CLEARWATER FL 33759 - Palm Harbor, FL 34684 CASO, RONALD CASTROGIOVANNI, LUKE CESARONE, JACK L CASO, BERNADETTE CASTROGIOVANNI, KELLY L CESARONE, MARY K 3 SUTPHIN AVE 9011 S NATOMA 40 HARBOR CT # 108 MATAWAN NJ 07747 - OAKLAWN IL 60453 - NAPERVILLE IL 60565 - 4409 CHARETTE, RALPH J & LOIS J TRU CHIAVATTI DEVELOPMENT INC CIOCIA, JAMES CHARETTE, RALPH J THE 7725 BIRCHMOUNT RD # 37 CIOCIA, TRACY 2219 TAMPA RD UNIONVILLE ON L3R 9X3 00030 - 187-11 PEPPER PIKE PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - CANADA LUTZ FL 33558 - CITRUS COUNTY INVESTMENTS INC CLARK, ROBERT B CLARK, TERRY M 905 DELAWARE ST CLARK, SANDRA H CLARK, JANE H SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - 3840 13201 CLAYTON RD 16756 WHITES STORE RD ST LOUIS MO 63131 - BOYDS MD 20841 - Clearwater Beach Association Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition COLTON, JAMES A Jay Keyes Doug Williams, President COLTON, LORI B 100 Devon Drive 2544 Frisco Drive 421 HAMPTON GREEN Clearwater, FL 33767 Clearwater, FL 33761 PEACHTREE CITY GA 30269 - 10 CORAL INVESTMENTS OF PINELLAS 18316 DOLLYBROOK LN LUTZ FL 33549 - 5858 CORAL MOTEL CONDO ASSN INC PO BOX 1669 CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 1669 COSTAWAY LLC 15 HEATH WAY BARRINGTON IL 60010 - DELETIOGLU, ISMET 2581 1/2 N CLARK ST CHICAGO IL 60614 - 1717 EASON, GEORGE H 409 CLARA DR BRANDON FL 33510 - 3727 EGAN, JOHN M 10 PAPAYA ST # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ENTEL, ROBERT J 2471 JOHNNA CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - DAY, WILLIAM A THE 1968 LAKEVIEW AVE DRACUT MA 01826 - 3210 DIGIANNANTONIO, GILBERT DIGIANNANTONIO, PAULETTE 3717 WOODRIDGE PL PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - ECKALL INVESTMENTS LLC 2201 4TH AVE N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 ELIAS, SCOTT D 1435 N CLEVELAND # E CHICAGO IL 60610 - EQUITABLE HOLDING CO LLC 7667 EQUITABLE DR # 201 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 - 40ORDEIRO, JACK CORDEIRO, ALDA 8209 W CRENSHAW ST TAMPA FL 33615 - DAY, WILLIAM A LIVING TRUST DAY, WILLIAM A THE 473 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - DIMMITT, LARRY H JR 150 WILLADEL DR BELLEAIR FL 33756 - EGAN, JOHN M 10 PAPAYA ST # 1604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ENGEBRETSEN, ARDEN B 10 PAPAYA ST # 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - EQUITABLE HOLDING CO LLC 7667 EQUITABLE DR # 201 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55455 - F S N PROPERTIES LLC FALLER, JANET L PERSONAL RESID FALLON, JOSEPH 9909 RACETRACK RD FALLER, JANET L THE FALLON, SHEILA TAMPA FL 33626 - 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1209 1 SEASIDE LN # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BELLEAIR FL 33756 - FARRELL, BRIAN M FARRELL, CYNTHIA B 5116 WESTSHORE DR NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 - FIVE OAKS SOUTH LLC PATAPIS, STEVE EST 5315 BOARDWALK ST HOLIDAY FL 34690 - 6622 FLOTO, RONALD J FLOTO, NANCY C 54 SASSOON ROAD POKFULAM 00000 - HONG KONG FORLINI, PAUL FORLINI, SHANNON 446 E SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - FOX, RALPH L III FOX, JOAN A 39 PINE RIDGE RD BUZZARDS BAY MA 02532 - 2118 FULLBACH INVESTMENTS LLC 2201 4TH ST N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - FULTON HOMES INC GAHERTY, JOHN B SR GAUDIN, DANIELE 70 GIBSON DR UNIT 13 GAHERTY, CECILIA G 521 MANDALAY AVE # 305 MARKHAM ON L3R 4C2 00030- 5527 S PARK AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CANADA HINSDALE IL 60521 - GIANFILIPPO, JOHN F GIANFILIPPO, LAURA L 162 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GIBSON, PAUL F 521 MANDALAY AVE # 610 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GIANFILIPPO, JOHN BURKETT, FRANKLIN S 1775 CEDAR WAXWING CT PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - GIBSON, PAUL F 521 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 GRIECO, DANIEL J II GRUDZIEN, SLAWOMIR GRIECO, DIANE Y GRUDZIEN, TERESA 521 MANDALAY AVE 6713 WEST IMLAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 CHICAGO IL 60631 - 1711 HALL, ROGER W HARTMAN, DOLORES M THE HALL, SYLVIA M UTA 3-30-82 521 MANDALAY AVE # 803 1850 SAN MATEO DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 3719 HEALY, PATRICK HEILMANS RESTAURANTS INC HEALY, MARY 447 MANDALAY AVE 19 DUNCKLEE ST CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2013 BRIGHTON MA 02135 - 2116 HOERNIG, OTTO W HORNUNG, NELSON HOERNIG, JUANITA S HORNUNG, PEGGY 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1201 1401 BRIGADON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 2934 J E C FUNDING INC J M C FAMILY INVESTMENTS LTD PO BOX 4689 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4689 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 JACOBSEN, GLENN C JASIULEVICIUS, ROMAS J JACOBSEN, BARBARA D 483 E SHORE DR # C-4 6 FERRAND WOODS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2033 SAINT LOUIS MO 63124 - JOHNSON, WILLIAM L JONES, THOMAS A 479 EAST SHORE DR # 1 GOFORTH, BOB C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2039 14 ARLINGTON ST ASHEVILLE NC 28801 - 2006 KAHRS, CAROLYN J KAROUNOS, THEODORE P KAHRS, HENRY G KAROUNOS, LORRAINE J 4834 QUILL CT 444 PINE HILL RD PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - LEONIA NJ 07605 - 4tIANNAS, SPIRO P GIANNAS, STATHIA P 25745 SANTOS WAY WESLEY CHAPEL FL 33544 - 5513 GONZALEZ, EDWARD A GONZALEZ, MARITZA 9400 LAWS RD CLEARMONT FL 34711 - GUIRGUIS, SAID N GUIRGUIS, MINERVA J 202 MONTFORD HALL CARY NC 27519 - 9412 HARTMAN, JEFFREY E HARTMAN, MARISA A 5 CORD GRASS LN OLD LYME CT 06371 - HICKMAN, GARY HICKMAN, MARY JO 405 ANCHOR ROW PLACIDA FL 33946 - IVERSON, DONALD D 1001 SAN MARCO ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - J N E BEACH CONDOS LLC 6326 MACLAURIN DR TAMPA FL 33647 - JENNINGS, MARK K JENNINGS, VICKI B 8471 FLOWERING CHERRY LN LAUREL MD 20723 - JOYCE, JILL E 1019 GUISANDO DE AVILA TAMPA FL 33613 - KIEFFER, ALAN L KIEFFER, NELLI L 521 MANDALAY AVE # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - KROLL, WOLFGANG KROLL, LILLI 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - LAWSON, PETER S 479 EAST SHORE DR # 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 LYLE, JOHN F LYLE, NANCY S 408 NORTH SHORE DR KNOXVILLE TN 37919 - KRYGIER, TESSIE LATEK,STANLEY 11109 KAREN DR ORLAND PARK IL 60467 - LEVINE, RICHARD LEVINE, BARBARA -2039 5047 OTIS AVE TARZANA CA 91356 - MAFFEZZOLI, DENNIS 19505 QUESADA AVE N # 1518 PT CHARLOTTE FL 33948 - 3114 MAJEWSKI, DENISE M TR SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINE J 43 LAKE ADALYN DR SOUTH BARRINGTON IL 60010 - MC LAUGHLIN, ANN K THE 72 MAPLETON ST BRIGHTON MA 02135 - 2822 MITCHELL, SALLY P 4 SMITH ST CHELMSFORD MA 01824 - 1702 NEAL, RALPH C NEAL, JULIE A 4622 OSAGE CT GREENBAY WI 54313 - M B C PROPERTIES II LLC 4500 NORTHWOODS LN BLOOMINGTON IN 47404 - MAGRATH, JAMES P MAGRATH, CAROL A 2 PRITCHARD LN WESTPORT CT 06880 - MAZAS LAND TRUST 2551 DREW ST # 102 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - MC SWEENEY, JOHN J MC SWEENEY, KATHLEEN K 309 BAHAMA DR APT C NORWOOD MA 02062 - 3830 MOMESSO, NOELLA MOMESSO, SERGIO 10 JONQUILLE KIRKLAND QC H91-1 3C4 CANADA 40SIAZEK, STANLEY KSIAZEK, STANISLAWA 6713 W I M LAY CHICAGO IL 60631 - 1711 LIEBERMAN, LAWRENCE T LIEBERMAN, DEBORAH S 10 WILLOWOOD LN OLDSMAR FL 34677 - MACK, DAVID A MACK, DAVID A REVOCABLE TRUST MACK, DAVID A THE 30 JELLIFF LN SOUTHPORT CT 06490 - MAGUIRE, PAUL 18 GOLDFINCH DR AMERICAN CANYON CA 94503 - MC DERMOTT, JAMES T DRAPP, SHANNON M 521 MANDALAY DR # 904 CLEARWATER FL 33780 - MC SWIGGIN, JAMES MC SWIGGINS, CHERYL A 12 SAXONY ST CLIFTON PARK NY 12065 - NAGALE, VISHWANATH T NAGALE, PUSHPAMALA V 521 MANDALAY AVE # 508 00030- CLEARWATER FL 33767 - OLIVER, ROBERT OLIVER, CHARLOTTE B 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1210 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ORISSA PROPERTIES LTD 31 BROAD ST ST HELIER JERSEY JE4 CXW 00000 CHANNEL ISLANDS PACK, JAMES D PACK, MARY B 30146 E TOPAZ DR SCOTTSDALE AZ 85258 - PARKDALE LLC PO BOX 17660 CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 0660 PERRY, GREGORY G LAHN, MONICA L 253 GLENSTONE CIR BRENTWOOD TN 37027 - PFAFF, ROBERT PHILLIPS, HAROLD PIMENIDIS, JOHN H PFAFF, BETTY PHILLIPS, MARGARET PIMENIDIS, CHRISTINA 521 MANDALAY AVE # 404 2459 TWINBROOKE RD 440 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - HICKORY NC 28602 - 8721 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2031 4OOLE, WILLIAM L III PLANES, REGINA M POMS, ALAN M ROBINSON, JOHN CONNIE JR 32700 US HIGHWAY 19 N 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1007 3 HUNTERS CROSSING CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - THE WOODLANDS TX 77381 - POTTER, PASCHOALENA POTTER, PASCHOALINA C PRESTON, MICHAEL G THE 463 EAST SHORE DR PO BOX 2535 419 E SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2033 SALISBURY MD 21802 - 2535 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 REHKEMPER, PHILIP A ROBULAK, KENNETH J SALTZMAN, MURRAY REHKEMPER, BARBARA A ROBULAK, PATRICIA J SALTZMAN, BARBARA 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1105 521 MANDALAY AVE # 302 1170 GULF BLVD # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SAND KEY CONSULTING LLC SANDOZ, DAVID C SCHUTZENDORF, GILBERT H THE 1015 NORTH RIVER WALK E SANDOZ, ANN L SCHUTZENDORF, ALICE M THE CHICAGO IL 60610 - 523 N OKLAHOMA AVE 19029 US HIGHWAY 19 N # B8 MORTON IL 61550 - CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 3015 SHEAR, MARILYN F SHEPPARD, KERILYN SOLENZIO, STEPHEN M 2650 MCCORMICK DR STE 130 SHEPPARD, KRISTIN 131 COMMERCIAL PKWY # 3A CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 328 SIX MILE RD BRANFORD CT 06405 - 2539 WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - STEPHANS, SUSAN STOJAK, JAMES L SUN HARBOR CONDO ASSN INC STEPHANS, DORIS STOJAK, ROBIN L SHORE DR APT 6 803 S GULFVIEW BLVD # 308 3964 MULLENHURST DR 479 E CLEARWATER R 33767 - 2039 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - SWIDEREK, TIMOTHY J TADROS, HANI S TANKEL, ROBERT L SWIDEREK, JOSEPH A YASSAOUI, SUZANNE TANKEL, TERRI G 4540 WEATHERVANE DR 2184 LAURENCE DR 1022 MAIN ST # D ALPHARETTE GA 30022 - CLEARWATER FL 33764 - DUNEDIN FL 34698 - TEJEDA, RAFAEL E THOMAS-KIRSCHKE, HEIDI THWAITE, EDWARD TEJEDA, IDELFIA A 525 MANDALAY AVE # 24 THWAITE, PATRICIA 3516 WOODRIDGE PL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 15 LOOKOUT POINT TRL PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - TOTOWA NJ 07512 - TILLY, CARL H TILLY, MARK A TOUCHTON, JOANN TILLY, JILL E DEL ROSE, MARYELLEN TOUCHTON, WALTER W 436 COUNTRY CLUB RD 266 LYNDHURST ST 10 PAPAYA ST # 702 BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1005 DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 7578 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - URINO, FRANK N & NATALIE TRUST VISOSO, ROBERTO VOULGARIS, APOSTOLOS 1627 MIDNIGHT PASS WAY VISOSO, GRACIELA VOULGARIS, ANNIKA CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 521 MANDALAY AVE # 307 441 EAST SHORE DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 WANDACHOWICZ, BOGDAN 10 PAPAYA ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WEYLIE, WALLACE 350 GULF BLVD INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - .s WARD, MICHAEL S WARD, GISELLE V 407 SOUTH ROYAL PALM WAY TAMPA FL 33609 - WILLIAMS, BERNABE REVOCABLE TR WILLIAMS, BERNABE THE 1204 SUNCAST LN STE 2 ELDORADO HILLS CA 95762 - OXARSTLER FAMILY TRUST WARSTLER, ARTHUR K THE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 905 CLEARWATER FL 33763 - YEAROUT, JANE R YEAROUT, JANET A 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 YEAROUT, JANE YOFAN, AVI YOFAN, AVI YEAROUT, JAMES YOFAN, JACQUELINE YOFAN, JACQUELINE 806 NARCISSUS 10 PAPAYA ST # 1202 521 MANDALAY AVE # 607 CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 CLEARWATER FL 33767 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - L -T --) -11171, ,U C O N O N M O5rn Y v, N C d FF- .W CLEARWATER A BEACH H RESUB / r ? '14°j04 0 4 S 6AYMONT $' as s• b as ,t I R > d SI I T ? ? a 1 > >< ? I ? T e 22 Ol [ ? > d a ? E N ? E I>a R SA. " so ?? 47, ? t •n r • I 6 r I MANDALAY I BEACH CLUB 7r iA Iel 48 I . ? 122-13 n Ie IIa y ? ° Ir y M 441 R PAPAYA St4 -t 7 aovt_ya et 1 I as I P Ir0 4" e IRYM ,. ., Ira > Y s I/9 10 T ; N i n I \ av s sx>,_rrre ... .... ..... 407 N 406 4 .. 101 / 23/01 loo ae> ase ri n for o a aea n ? 86 T M 2315 60N-tai) - 23 ' 92 4 58B ? ,r CITY OF CLEARWATER _ - - PINEUAS DCOUNTY FLORIDA PPEPAPED Br PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION R. ENCIEERING 7 1D0 Nylle Ave.. , Cloo,tm, fl 33756 r Pn.: (727)562-4750, Go.: (727)526-4755 Mlp: //rwr.Heolr0lw-e.tam/Clly?oporlmMl3/DaDOt_agY>/Mginen/ HARBOR 12 -15 Div tdmw: ' Public Mlofmotion data Is fuMishod by the City of Clearwater STREET $ Public Worts AdmiAlttratbn/EnphewMp. and must De .-lied e a0 e0 and used by the reciplent with the und- oMMp that the data i 0 Ier s I CORAL ' e ve rm cdieele0 la lne purpose of devdoatnp o proDhic Mfrosi clure I-lo,y. AS ch, the Cily of Clewwotw PWA/E x a: M01 EL mOSe> n0 rwrontift eapreseed or hnI d. eoncarnlnp in* ' i e/ 3 CONDO 42-114 aaeWMy eOmPle1MHS, rdlobl8ly. w sullot, nmy 01 ti, data for any nw pwlicldO' use. Gurlnwmwe. the City or Cleo raiw at 1» It , n ' t1 4» SUN PWA assumes no liability rhotloewr oswioted w111, the use or mI.. of sucn data. f/°0 •es HARBOR CONDO um Tnis Atlo opape Is Dleo, to pwbd, M 4> 1 e • Gar inrarmollM DWI late9l r NsiMe please < I of vlsfl our Web it.. N h 4u ra trA N rot IOD,a 4 < 24 W b o1 ew d y4r r ;se Sp0..\ - 709']0 I '6- __. J 4 m ? - Imn> or mw Op --- $ CAVSQWAY BLVD 8 g? @ 9 „ @ t3 12 plsr WN[a PPOP[PSr 8 R C, s MBIAeA ?.L S15 O P 8 ?A, 60 8 WATER LOT , P 0.9 taxMtpp p3 Exist channel 1 ,026-92 - \ oovt a7 3 32/03 N 0 ,DO 2QO 400 600 SCALE: ," a 400* LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER 1234 LOT ADDRESS CITY LIMITS LINE SHADED AREA - PROPERTY OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS ? AGREEMENT TO ANNEX • ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ZONE LINE PINK m REVISED; 09/09/2002 ZONING ATLAS NW 1 /d [3r 4Z9PTIAM I -% A^ -1 A .r September 4, 2005 City of Clearwater Community Development Board PO Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl. 33658-4748 RE: CDB, meeting/Parkdale LLC Dear Board Members: r SEP 0 8 2005 i 11 DCVELOF'!tc?aT & NEIGHBORHOOD : ERVICES CITY OF CI £?W4TEN I am writing you as Sec/Tres. Of the Sun Harbor Condominium Association which I happen to live in, that is directly to the north of the proposed Parkdale LLC, townhouse development at 475 East Shore Dr., Clearwater Beach, Florida. I moved to the beach some 18 years ago and have watched and participated in the redevelopment throughout this time. As a 10 year member of the Community Development Board and before that the variance board for the City of Clearwater, I have helped Clearwater Beach transform into a vital redevelopment area. I felt I always paid close attention to immediate neighbor's opinions, knowing they have to live next to my decisions. The Homeowners Association and all the members of Sun Harbor Condominium are vehemently opposed to this development at 475 East Shore Dr. We realize that something can be built on this small 60 foot lot and as long as they ask for no setback variances, we are amicable to this redevelopment. But when a developer tries to put ten pounds in a five pound bag we are opposed. What has happened to view corridors, impervious surface, and setbacks from sea walls? We DO NOT want another Brightwater Drive on East Shore. Parkdale is requesting numerous variances and in fact all the way around the building they are proposing they are requesting variances. But they are NOT considering what is built already. We, at Sun Harbor, have a 30 foot side setback from our north and south property lines, to provide a view corridor of the water. We could have built at a 10 foot setback. Parkdale has a 10 foot side setback requirement but are requesting 5 feet, TO CLOSE to us. We have a 30 foot rear setback from the water; Parkdale has a 20 foot setback requirement but is requesting ZERO setbacks to build a pool deck. What about our views to the south? Parkdale knew the rules when they bought this substandard lot. Now they are requesting that the CDB bend those rules for them to build what they want. All we are asking is for Parkdale to live by those rules and build with no variances. We at Sun Harbor, realize that they paid an astronomical amount of money for this substandard lot and they need to build a large building on this lot to recoup their investment. But that is not our problem. Has Parkdale once requested a meeting with any of its neighbors? NUM ! ! We know why i 1 because they are afraid of what we might say if we saw their plan. Well we have seen their plan and DO NOT like it. Parkdale was hoping that no neighbors would see this plan and this would just sail through the CDB. Not this time. Set the standard for East Shore Drive and make Parkdale build within the rules as set forth by the building codes. We are well beyond the point when the rules were bent to stimulate re-development of Clearwater Beach, redevelopment has arrived. Now you on the CDB must set the standards higher to build quality redevelopments to ensure that Clearwater Beach is the Gold Standard in years to come. Sincerely yo , Bill Jo n Sun H or Condominium 479 East Shore Dr. #1 Clearwater, Fl. 33767 0--l Atlas Page: 267A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval request for a reduction of the side (northand south) setbacks from 10 feet to five feet (to building), a reduction in the rear setback (request needs clarification), as a Comprehensive In1fil Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C and Preliminary Plat approval for 2 lots and as C I , ?s1 ?? Comprehensive Landscape Program application under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G. `, Alrfff""/, Proposed Use: Attached dwellings `w II/ Neighborhood Coral Resort Condominum Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 ` 483 E Shore Drive TELEPHONE: 727446-3711, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: coral483@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, F133767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Presenter: Mike Reynolds, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Mike Reynolds, Scott Rice, Anne Blackburn, Tom Glenn, Rick Albee The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . 1) Individual sewer laterals shall be provide for each unit. 2) Individual water service to be provided for each unit. 3) Provide a 4 ft. concrete sidewalk along East Shore Drive. (Development Code Sections 3-1701 and 3-1907 and Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30) 4) The proposed connection of the two driveways shall not be in the public right-of-way. 5) Provide 4" fire line to the rear of property. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. The following to be addressed prior to building permit: l) Any new concrete driveway apron(s) constructed within the right-of-way shall be a minimum 6" thick fibrous concrete, and a minimum 3000 psi with 6" x 6" / 10 x 10 w.w.m. [sidewalks shall not to be constructed within this apron area(s)]. (Clearwater Contract Specifications and Standards, Article 30) 2) Final Plat must be recorded with Pinellas County prior to a Building Permit being issued for any vertical construction. (Development Code 4-708) Environmental: Comment-Please note;regarding dock structures- This permit is for demolition only. A separate permit must be submitted for the constriction of any new dock structure. Case Number: FLD2005-06056 -- 475 EAST SHORE DR Owner(s): Parkdale Llc Po Box 17660 VW', 4kql Clearwater, F133762 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Belleair Harbor, Lic Po Box 514 Indian Rocks Beach, Fl 3 TELEPHONE: 727-420-5664, FAX: 517-1747, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Bret Krasman 31564 Us 19 N Palm Harbor, FI 34684 TELEPHONE: 727-787-4684, FAX: 727-781-3345, E-MAIL: bret@krasengr.com Location: 0.19 acres located on the east side of East Shore Drive, approximately 300 feet south of the intersection of East Shore Drive and Baymont Street. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 52 H Fire: 1 . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC review by Fire is not an approval or review of any constriction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2 . Provide and show on the site plan a fire hydrant within 300 It and on the same side of the street PRIOR TO CDB. 3 . This property will have to be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Provide and show on the site plan the FDC, located at least 15 off the building and within 40 feet of the fire hydrant dedicated to the fire sprinkler system PRIOR TO CDB. 5 . Provide and show on the site plan a standpipe water supply with 2 1/2 inch connection and 1 1/2 inch adaptor with breakable cov er and chain within 100 feet of any pier/land intersection for the docks as per NFPA-303, PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to constriction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Fire Deparatment Connection shall be identified by a sign that staes 'No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 8 . Clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the firehydrant, with a 4 foot cleaarance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknoweedge PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: No Comments Parks and Recreation: 1 . A recreation facility impact fee of $200 is due for each new residential unit prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. Credit will be given for any existing residential units. Contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824. Note: Need verification of number of units in recently demolished motel in order to give correct credit for residential units. Stormwater: No Comments Solid Waste: That Solid Waste & Recycling service be arranged with the Solid Waste Department prior to the issuance of an occupational license or certificate of occupancy. Please contact Tom Glenn - 727-562-4930 Traffic Engineering: 1 , Dimension driveway width and length. 2. Show 20'x 20' sight visibility triangles at the driveways. (City's Community Development Code, Section 3-904). 3. Provide new, upgraded or repaired sidewalks compliant with City Code and ADA standards. (Development Code Section: 3-1701) All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. General Note : A transportation impact fee of $2,840.00 (2 units x $1420/unit) to be paid prior to a C.O.. Planning: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 53 t . I. Part of the written request on the application form needs clarification/completion relative to the rear setback. 2. How was density computed? Submerged lands cannot be used to compute density. 3. The units/building mass seem large and oversized for this property, as not enough space was allowed for setbacks and parking. Driveway design shows backOUt parking. 4. The site plan needs labels with dimensional arrows to indicate setback distances from the rear to any structures. Label all structures. 5. Written narrative composition needs expansion and clear statements with reasons for all requests. Other: No Comments Notes: Q Yid ?eee Z.4/ Development Review Agenda - Thursday, August 4, 2005 - Page 54 Bill Johnso n 479 East S hcre Dr. Suite 1 Clearwater, R. 33767 C PO Box 4748 Clearwater, Fl w'W e--,. -r4 fE ,man & Associates, Inc. IVIL ENGINEERING ]MET KRASMAK P.E. EMA L. BRET@KRASENGR.COM Phone: (727)787-4684 31564 US 19 N. Fax: (727) 781-3345 Palm Harbor, FL 34684 Cell: (727) 647-9080