FLD2005-07074
° rwater
u <
Planning Department
100 South Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Telephone: 727-562-4567
Fax: 727-562-4865
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ?i
? SUBMIT 1, COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including
1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans
31 SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 12-05-
z0 5-
CASE #:
CASE
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT
PROPERTIES:
NORTH:
SOUTH:
WEST:
EAST:
NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS)
RECEIVED
FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NOV 2 32005
Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004)
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
EA I y W-
WClEARWATER
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT-
A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
APPLICANT NAME: HMQ 8tAA R 152K RC--A -rV ( Su I-[c- t ®'Z
MAILING ADDRESS:r 1 0 sau-r Hr T ?}1???s ? ?1+? ?'!•EI?L. 1 Vwjw
PHONE NUMBER: C -?Z7) Z I - 19 an PAX NUMBER: H-Z7, Z 10 14 (31
p p
PROPERTY OWNER(S): 14 AG N? L i A T?k2 REAL117Y, We- EKG 0240 > YIC-$
(Must include ALL owners a? s??list? onA tTth? e deed -provf? ginal signature(s) on page 6)
ft ?1? AESS M&D
AGENT NAME: Sc wT-r Lt nYCSs L-A
6 LA cult t?
MAILING ADDRESS: 1+4(o CC(?.i? S?'Cer. C+-c? jyzw&-T
PHONE NUMBER: C- Z7 FAX NUMBER: (72-1) fib ° 9 d ?
CELL NUMBER: _ C-72- -7-)i -7011 -L (G i E-MAIL ADDRESS:5 L L M C-b Lai & LA CL V I L , C Al
B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A)
STREET ADDRESS of subject site: C? 0-7 c Co t f F:77 9AY2Ab,S 0t,4 )W c L&Kw MT&L FL
Lkwl
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ?C R
C
?T 1
(if not fisted he e, please note the location of this do ment in the ubmdtal JJJ
PARCEL NUMBER: IisIga ', a? 5? ?, OG?t)b'Z1,?OL1Q0®?y?a/p/?®
PARCEL SIZE: ®. 62-7 -}. AU&S 36 o"41 0 S F Mt
(acres, square feet) Vol
PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): I 5? 0 1C-6 -t- (9 T6wM 4&yiC- U mITS
(number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) /?
C 1 J sF GF4
DESCRIPTIONOF REQUEST(S): 1"1 %XC--D U.<ue FaZ,-r&C-r ViA 0-OMPR646,1S106 I^}19LL Otl
Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number f parking spaces, specific use, etc. ,
w? rs40WE uI'?r-rs SEE PW CEl 'cA CS
Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
1)
0 4 ORIGINAL
DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes RtCENED
documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) Nnv n K 2005
ad' SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT AAA ?,SyjlJd?,C p???E?IiSH?IAP (see
page 6) /--????VVN111J( }jWENT
D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) SEE t°(?C-C? pF2iZATotJE
F:i:?K sPEc(nc bErAI ws
? Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explaid.how each criteria is achieved, in detail:
1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties In which it
is located.
'THC' E&m is 1a0N6014 " (AND 11066 AIJQ ALI-OWS F=AR OF OISS t 0,50 ? Am* l>
W54-- ITY of- IS d4 IAA 4 Ztf du I Acs %11'b" CCI, RE6P6 rl%R-'-t.Y. T+tC- fRC3-6C'r Is'
S fry
?c-aa k? Cot i+ Lr?i ? wi-rQ T1?E ?T?S A1Jt> WILL- ew- I wl tiAkg W wo-H -me
C MA-f&L C* AC;TAcb,1T (of t7r, ES r.E. -Mf Soe oA -:s ?EC-T To ToE n1oi2.T1-f ,
2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly
c; impair the uerAs
" r4i Paz FINSED 14 t\lo wAy 44 l nt oc- &S OtL 6 is eaAre-GC-S Diey-Lcpm&?°r
®F AD-ZAC.E-4T LAt4fDS Arjis ii5E of Ifstu?fnfC,S 1-ke P1C'OZIE-CT is EXFt-CT6j To
r A4P?2byE , NoT r AdPAt2 , VAL.t< b J: -Tfe P/1ZRF?gy lr JD ADW&s-r A2aff-e?j &S.,
3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed
?ll?Iff6, PmaPasc? As 0*b- aF T-{cs ^Ie-cT w1(-L Ar ? rA4 Acl-ToE HC-- ,9"f?--W
0Fr TtfE aJ iGE f??L Pf? s> W/L ITS ,QESr 6fJr
S. f?gQWi fl SlWW W47&Z , ACCC-SS. ?C 60
rRA-r6L 4Al(3 L4JD5U<
}p6 5,t{c
L-0 k C&u L:r 14 W--ALT#f 8 M FOY I M
4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
AI4 I rAMW? ACCESS c?'R?kf(-?AY 7o MA 6 nr 6U A Ave
(,.i tTt 4 SAFE RC-S t D c?Tl? t_ , ?%Fi cE , f?-IVZC- L S-?.t D U)ASTE 'r2AFrI C- ACC-as i 6 t L "
The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel
I Ml`A 6->tATE -SQRRG',AA Dt 46 COMM U rwr
loi CLu bc-S
d for development.
FiJ :(L OAK&
Y-?*hc-iA TIZA& "C--S A LWC - U?,b2lL PLAN/ G, ,MfZ0o,1M6\Sr (z 41CA 1 S t-4 t>uS iUE T;c,
-T-:R(S TY PI` o? t4t kE-r,> LA Se
?F? C? I! o ?`E c7
6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts,
+ G a ac PGSS6:t> CE IOU i L> ta1'ILL
ec- `? f I?F??lat 1. h iCt` t r, UTI L I
?ILtI.1?i ?shll?.A{Uj BLaSI?S >?aul?j, °r?(?) Towr.L?Ern^/1? cIJ1t.?... ? irf-?wJfJ
1WhMtAt. IBS , VW U? mmcvJ rb TgE kk6A At?? urY oFF LwaAr6t
N e 90;61 0 u s , M PA c-rs AR6 r cP6crc N NK?
V. -7-ME-56- 66?,?crs S40UU> eof-7 Rc-bcArn
? Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain
how each criteria is achieved in detail:
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity
and development standards.
BRA CT? CAL M % tct-D *XSr: k-U(-L09M6JT of Tt1E SUeX-CT ReQU I 92C
Dy i kri oNS r--RotA OEUCt ok'M?1? S-rAt iDR2D5 VoK 8-u i t -Dlntt> $ PWACY4T SC-T6gCKS
Ltf?2 S , kf?b TS 4Z M, lei S G.IScC-ir-s I I.1 TE I A fTT/a (dti Wn-rr1r • t ,4 ,0/,? AT Fr- I'
Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
? 0 ORIGINAL
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not
reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the
improvements.)
>%-'1J6L &- 'y &A r Or Tgle SZ?16TECT &M -Q t'-L tom, i N SEAR MOY4 1i VM A94-To R, PRO-Tt i£IS ANp
FR T, Es A t4 "LL, I N C6- MAaV-ET AL_" -rONC- 020( -I S , QtS rN y
VAWED Co 14 2laSiC00 - ftZ'WCr 1SqWC T. = - ILII fi
3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
Pt' aoP ,c-, ag:1CE $ fowr?AwAE u5c-_s Atu. ft,?t7ZE1J 6c t,??tC--2E W T+{ E' _
0--rry 5F CL6AV?_"Ar&NQ_ AS UJ ? AS i4 -TEt zb-AAmu , OrSTaicrs
4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
--rte PllaE -cam aF?:iCE L -rtuaN ilwE UK'& "& COMPd17 %C: W=TH A4_'KSAC6-,V_ USE'S
of o CC _ME HAAPWL DAILS -roc?N H E i ?Ce7' TAE of W
P1 XZ-_LLAS "T41 L- f=U12T146/L 5'uP +A(S M t, C 0F::u s ES
5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within tth±e? comprehensive infll redevelopment project are not
ttrwi evail??bl?e in the City Clearwater.
ffltm? SITE 15 ?F/I1Sj,?E L 94 T Q L r ? -rFfC- I I??-6CT-
iR6-DEVG-t.ePKENT 0 -CAC- SuBlECT 0L0t Y Is ihf CL-0-SE ACGS&? Wrr+f THE
C oA-,_s 11 Po ?t c t?S Antra t ic-e3i?ES r TFfC Q_iTV Or-7 CLEx4/ZUA-f & AiQb WJu_
Cl&1Tt N LLE To U PG RA De TF 4 E A R6A
7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
`-me ?oP ? pmt CYc 1 f 6LZ .M tfoME OXOTECT EnS ilA CES -M E A LR EA
-TR AAS :1VC_" W12 &A Mutsmr CtkAqAC7-,R... 8Y Fts RyEV I tJ G k C-)CPA1,i 4 G -{F"
i` L_%vE- u_)UZt - 'iA-Y " M of o F USCS A-N p D&VC-LePM Eel i I N -Ftf C- Q !Y
8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole.
°T4E N&SEcT trlokilbes Lxp--To- CA-rc LcDPMC-Yi wilt +t wtu, e6\AC-RT IRE
Cav?M u n?rrY c4AYZ A7, ,so UALtu ES A&Vc- •r) 6EYop TfFE
PiEGIUCS_ME $ C-Ex181tr 1 y T? s Ct L t! JE '/?'r f?lr < ??"?9?JlJ D s
9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development.
PA12kki?. (4E 0WICe P/AKIN-) ulkk_ EC- !E f440e_-> AS GUEST PAk.)QnC F;42 IR
'rLX,_)M1fbMES J)LA(?.I/?C, MbM-BUS/A/C-&S e U)6f ? /cswas
10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Use separate sheets as necessary.
G ReO-1-C i S A10-F Q0CA1 11-J ef_0-(&L CF I R6 r,,G p 1ST/Zi C-/S ,
` xJ ILDiNj( 6L6JAr+oAf_s age 66j oeb Fee- -M- 05Kl c6 460 -rax),J > &06-
Bu tLA_b1(4C S Ail A-TfA C i (C- l E ICI.- RU le(A)
5Ee Fi o-TEC7 NA1ZQ_4TVE F02 SP60Fic Ne-rAiL?
Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity
of the parcel proposed for development.
0 ORIGINAL
E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri
Manual and 4-202.A.21)
A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that in,
addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance
the City of Clearwater. Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem
to this requirement. C CAces, cpi ft,tAi5 9 tr-rA .HK:r-? +(cr,-6taTtt
If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt.
5r" At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following:
? Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines;
Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures;
All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems;
Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure;
A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan Including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the
City manual.
Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations.
? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL
(SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable
Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
- Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevatio
e provided.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN JA
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
ns shall
ND
F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A)
W SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies;
ge/ TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location,
theexisting trees;
including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around "S)
al/ ' LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; C C11SUT "R_ St(Ce- OF ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to
the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in
A11A accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the
/ parking standards are approved;
GRADING PLAN, as applicable;
? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided);
? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable;
G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) RECEIVED
d SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): ? All dimensions;
North arrow; NOV 0
Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; 12005
? Location map; PLANNING
Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; DEPAr1RT
Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; CITY O MENr
_ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; F CLEARWATER
All required setbacks;
_? All existing and proposed points of access;
All required sight triangles;
s/ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen
/ trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc;
? Location of all public and private easements;
? Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site;
Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas
and water lines;
All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas;
Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas;
Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per
Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701);
Location of all landscape material;
I/ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities;
Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and
Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks.
Cr' SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form:
Land area in square feet and acres;
Number of EXISTING dwelling units;
Number of PROPOSED dwelling units;
_ Gross floor area devoted to each use;
Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with-the number of required spaces;
Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area;
Size and species of all landscape material;
_ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement;
Building and structure heights;
Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and
Floor area ratio (F.A_R.) for all nonresidential uses.
Q/ REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 'Y2 X 11) and color rendering if possible;
C1 FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional'Information on site plan: ?C2E1
J
NL One-foot contours or spot elevations on site;
Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel;
All open space areas;
Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms;
Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned);
Streets and drives (dimensioned);
Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned);
Structural overhangs;
Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees.
H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS; (Section 4-1102.A)
?? LANDSCAPE PLAN:
All existing and proposed structures;
Names of abutting streets;
L Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations;
_ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers;
-? Sight visibility triangles;
Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing;
Proposed and required parking spaces;
Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, Including driplines (as indicated on
required tree survey);
Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed
landscape materials, including botanical and common names;
Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule;
? Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and
protective measures;
Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and
? percentage covered;
_ Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board);
? Irrigation notes.
Q/ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (color rendering if possible);
? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval);
? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met.
n n 2005
3IANNING DEpAIRTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
• 0 ORIGINAL
AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT:
(Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names)
1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location):
2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a:
3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do)
as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other docts
4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater
5. That site visits to the property are necessary by C' preonta
representatives to visit and photograph the property d i ed in this %W j
6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereb that the S,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
k
i?
petition;
to c9fisider and act on the above described property;
this application and the owner authorizes City
and correct.
Property Owner
Property Owner
//STATE OF FLORIDA,
Before me the undersigned n officer d commi
sonally 4t,ds e ared
Deposes and says that /s illy and ti
l
49y)
V
My Commission
?hed by the laws of the State of Florida, on this day of
who having been first duly sworn
contents of the affidavit that he/she signed.
Notary Public
RECEIVED
NOV Q 8 1005
S:\Planning DepartmentlApplicatio Formsldevelopment revieMfiexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
0
t ORIGINAL
BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23)
Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part
of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project.
BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials;
(i-k( REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 Y2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if
possible) as required.
J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806)
? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or
to remain.
V/ All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs
shall include the street address (numerals)
? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required).
CV/ Reduced signage proposal (8 %X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive-Sign Program application.
K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A-13 and 4-801.C)
N( Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development:
• Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day.
• Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is
on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections.
Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual.
The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning
Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750)
Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement.
? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following):
Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway
I 99s and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting.
%niT(,S Traffic Impact Study is not required.
CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND
NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY
OCCUR.
If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750.
L. SIGNATURE:
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of
authorize City r Ares nt i s to visit and photograph the property A.D. 20? to me and/or by
described in th?4.ap a ' who is C?ersonally kno4y? has
p
roduceation. as
U RM WED
c _.
Signature o op o er or pres ntative
NOV Q 8 2005 o ary public,
My commission expires: .'0:. RosaNs G. MoGNtnh
PLANNING DEPARTMENT J ,s 2007
CITY OF CLEAR WATER
Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Application 2005- City of Clearwater
B K B PROPERTIES, INC.
907 S. FT. HARRISON AVENUE
SUITE 102
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
(727) 210-1900 FAX (727) 210-1901
Letter of Authorization
Engineering and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
ORIGINAL
This letter does hereby authorize Scott Lincoln, PE and/or Stephen Allen, PE of LA
Civil, to act as our agent(s) in an effort to secure all variances, easement releases,
engineering approvals and permits from all regulatory agencies, departments and
personnel of City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Southwest Florida Water Management
District (SWFWMD), Florida DOT, and Florida DEP, as necessary for the development
and construction of the Magnolia Park Office & Townhome Project, as proposed by
Magnolia Park Realty, LLC, and located at 907 South Fort Harrison Avenue,
Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida. -7 it)
Signed: Date:
Brett A. Braciak, President
B K B Properties, Inc., a Florida corporation
NOTARY:
County of Pinellas
State of Florida
I hereby certify that on this day, before me, the above, Brett A. Braciak, did personally
appear before me and execute the foregoing instrument, and acknowledgement that he
executed the same.
Witnesseth my hand and official seal in the county and state aforesaid, this day of
2005.
No ary Signature (Seal/Stam???
'?°r ROsaUe G. VE
?innis p
y W COmmission DOI W& V iv l IV 0 8 1005
`°? w°? Expires May 18, 2007
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
• 0
B K B PROPERTIES, INC.
907 S. FT. HARRISON AVENUE
SUITE 102
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
(727) 210-1900 FAX (727) 210-1901
Letter of Authorization
Engineering and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
Date: /!dos-
I
This letter does hereby authorize Scott Lincoln, PE and/or Stephen Allen, PE of LA
Civil, to act as our agent(s) in an effort to secure all variances, easement releases,
engineering approvals and permits from all regulatory agencies, departments and
personnel of City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Southwest Florida Water Management
District (SWFWMD), Florida DOT, and Florida DEP,, as necessary for the development
and construction of the Magnolia Park Office & Townhome Project, as proposed by
Magnolia Park Realty, LLC, and located at 907 South Fort Harrison Avenue,
Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida.
Signed: vy,
Brett A. Braciak, President
B K B Properties, Inc., a Florida corporation
NOTARY:
County of Pinellas
State of Florida
RECEIVED
ORIGINAL
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
I hereby certify that on this day, before me, the above, Brett A. Braciak, did personally
appear before me and execute the foregoing instrument, and acknowledgement that he
executed the same.
Witnesseth my hand and official seal in the county and state aforesaid, this 6- day of
, 2005.
Nota Signature (Seal/Stamp above)
?? •c?, Rosalie G. McGinnis
My Commission DD196&V
Expires May 16, 2007
16 •
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY, LLC
907 S. FT. HARRISON AVENUE
SUITE 102 ORIGINAL
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
(727) 210-1900 FAX (727) 210-1901
Letter of Authorization
Engineering and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter does hereby authorize Scott Lincoln, PE and/or Stephen Allen, PE of LA
Civil, to act as our agent(s) in an effort to secure all variances, easement releases,
engineering approvals and permits from all regulatory agencies, departments and
personnel of City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Southwest Florida Water Management
District (SWFWMD), Florida DOT, and Florida DEP, as necessary for the development
and construction of the Magnolia Park Office & Townhome Project, as proposed by
Magnolia Park Realty, L C, and located at 907 South Fort Harrison Avenue,
Clearwater, Pinellas;C`dup 14 Florida.
L'-
Signed: Date:
Andr J Hupp, ger Member
Magnolia Park Real , LC a Florida
Limited Liability Compan DECEIVED
NOTARY: NOV 0 8 2005
County of Pinellas PLANNING DEPARTMENT
State of Florida CITY OF CLEARWATER
I hereby certify that on this day, before me, the above, Andrew J. Hupp, did personally
appear before me and execute the foregoing instrument, and acknowledgement that he
executed the same.
Witnesseth my hand and official seal in the county and state aforesaid, this _ ' day of
2005.
NotarySignature
(Seal/Stamp above)
ow? Rosalie G. McGinnis
`' Z My Commission 00196530
or W Expires May 16, 2007
•
XIVIL
Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc.
PROJECT NARRATIVE
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 2 3 2005 .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
The proposed Magnolia Park Offices and Townhomes Project is proposed as a Mixed Used project on
the subject property owned by Magnolia Park Realty, LLC and BKB Properties, Inc. located at 907 South
Fort Harrison Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756. The property is presently comprised of platted lots
within the "C" (Commercial) and "O" office Zoning Districts. Both zoning districts allow for the
proposed uses with FAR limits of 0.55 and 0.50, respectively and residential densities limited to 24
du/acre and 15 du/acre, respectively. According the City of Clearwater Land Development Code, the
mixed uses can be developed together as a Comprehensive Infill Project.
Hence, the Applicant, Magnolia Park Realty, LLC is submitting a Flexibility Application for review by
the City of Clearwater with the following proposed elements and requested deviations from the
development standards.
PROPOSED PROJECT ELEMENTS:
The project is proposed with a 6,069 SF (5,250 GFA per Code) professional office building positioned
toward the South Fort Harrison avenue frontage on 10,000 SF of 10,184 SF of the "C" zoned portion of
the property. A total of (9) Townhome Units are proposed on the remainder of the property zoned "C"
and "O".
Office access will be via an.existing shared driveway from South Fort Harrison Avenue. Office parking
will be at the rear of the building (21 spaces) with cross access to the east and south to a driveway
connection to Magnolia Avenue. The Magnolia entrance, although shared, will be the main entrance for
the Townhomes. The project will have a common stormwater pond and solid waste dumpster enclosure.
Parking for the Townhomes will be via (1) 2-car garage per unit and the Office parking spaces will,
however, serve as guest parking for the Townhomes after normal business hours and during weekends
and holidays.
Water and sewer services will be connected to the office via existing connections remaining from
demolition of the existing office building on the property. The Townhomes will be served with private
gravity sewer system to a private lift station onsite that will be connected to the gravity sewer manhole at
the intersection of South Fort Harrison Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Water services for the
Townhomes will be via independent residential meters connected to a proposed 6-inch water line
extension for a new fire hydrant via the existing water main on the south side of Magnolia Avenue. The
entire project will be landscaped in accordance with the City of Clearwater code requirements and
signage will be incorporated tastefully into the project.
REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
1. South Building Setback reduction from 10' to 7' along south side of office building.
2. South Pavement Setback reduction from 10' to 3' along south side of office building for 3'
sidewalk.
3. South Buffer reduction from 5' to 3' along south side of sidewalk located along south side of
office building.
4. West Building Setback reduction from 25' to 10' along the west side of the office building.
1446 Court Street - Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph: (727) 446-9000 - Fax: (727) 446-9050 - E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com - E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com
Project Narrative (081-006.200)
Magnolia Park Office & Townhomes
11/22/05
Page 2 of 6
5. West Buffer reduction from 15' to 10' along west front of office building.
6. North Buffer reduction from 5' to 0' along north side of office building due to shared drive
aisle with neighboring use owned by others.
7. North Building Setback reduction from 10' to 8' along the north rear of townhomes building.
8. North Buffer reduction from 10' to 8' along north rear of townhomes building.
9. East Building Setback reduction from 10' to 7' along the east side of townhomes building.
10. East Pavement Setback reduction from 10' to 4' along the east side of townhomes building
for the proposed pedestrian walkway.
11. East Buffer reduction from 10' to 4' along east side of townhomes building.
12. South Building Setback reduction from 25' to 5' along the south side of townhomes building
to allow for porches & roof overhang.
13. South Pavement Setback reduction from 25' to 5' along the east south of townhomes building
to allow for porches and parking pavement.
14. South Buffer reduction from 15' to 5' along the east south of townhomes building to allow
for porches and parking pavement.
15. West Buffer reduction from 10' to 0' along townhome guest parking abutting Dr. Janelli's
property.
16. South Buffer reduction from 5' to 0' along office parking lot abutting Dr. Janelli's property.
PROJECT JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT:
The proposed project includes a two-story office building and 9 townhomes. The project will replace a
totally impervious site with a dilapidated 6,486 SF office building which is in disrepair and has been
vacant and unattended by Morton Plant Hospital for several years. The proposed office building will
provide for a modern Florida Vernacular Theme with a very high quality architecture. The office
building will increase side yard and front yard setbacks from what currently exists. The parking and
driveway access will be expanded to current code and provide for proper traffic movement for both this
and an adjoining property. Fire hazards will be effectively removed and accessibility will be improved.
The current drive is non-conforming and 12 feet wide versus 24 feet proposed. Green space and
Landscaping will be lush, verdant and of the highest quality possible. Overall the office building
will expand the regentrification of this area.
The townhomes are going to be developed as 9 units and feature similar design criteria as the adjoining
Townhomes of Harbor Oaks to the north. The units will feature high quality building materials and
functional floor plans. The density will be less than that afforded the project adjoining north
(Townhomes of Harbor Oaks) and will be less than the density afforded the property on the south side of
Magnolia of which both are allowed 24 units per acre while our density is 12 units per acre. This lower
density townhome offering expands the landscaping and green area capabilities compared to the adjoining
properties and adds a less dense green environ relative to the large asphalt parking of Morton Plant to the
east and the other adjoining properties. Overall, the project should add approximately $4 to $5 million
dollars to the tax rolls versus the $250,000 assessment which currently exists and represents a very
aesthetically pleasing project to this evolving rim of the downtown area of Clearwater.
Please see below for project-specific examples related to the (6) Written Submittal Requirements and the
(10) Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria. Where deemed necessary, the Applicant has
elected to expound on the Application responses to further support the project design.
0 ORIGINAL
Project Narrative (081-006.200) RECEIVED
Magnolia Park Office & Townhomes
11/22/05 NOV 2 3 2005
Page 3 of 6
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
(6) WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
Criteria 1: The proposed development of land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk,
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located.
Response: The proposed project includes a two-story office building and 9 townhomes. The project
will replace a totally impervious site with a dilapidated 6,486 SF office building which is
in disrepair and has been vacant and unattended by Morton Plant Hospital for several
years. The proposed office building will provide for a modern Florida Vernacular Theme
with a very highquality architecture. The office building will increase side yard and front
yard setbacks from what currently exists. The parking and driveway access will be
expanded to current code and provide for proper traffic movement for both this and an
adjoining property. Fire hazards will be effectively removed and accessibility will be
improved.
The current drive is non-conforming and 12 feet wide versus 24 feet proposed. Green
space and Landscaping will be lush/verdant and of the highest quality possible. Overall,
the office building will expand the re-gentrification of this area. The townhomes are
going to be developed as 9 units and feature similar design criteria as the adjoining
Townhomes of Harbor Oaks to the north. The units will feature high quality building
materials and functional floor plans. The density will be less than that afforded the
project adjoining north (Townhomes of Harbor Oaks) and will be less than the density
afforded the property on the south side of Magnolia of which both are allowed 24 units
per acre while our density is 12 units per acre. This lower density townhome offering
expands the landscaping and green area capabilities compared to the adjoining
properties and adds a less dense green environ relative to the large asphalt parking of
Morton Plant to the east and the other adjoining properties.
Criteria 2: The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate
development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the
value thereof.
Response: The mixed use project shall increase the access driveway width to the adjoining north
office building from 12 feet to 24 feet and also provide for proper fire access and
increase the view triangle along Fort Harrison Avenue. The $4 million dollar project
will enhance adjoining property values and provide for a more aesthetically pleasing
environ.
Overall, the project should add approximately $4 to $5 million dollars to the tax rolls
versus the $250,000 assessment which currently exists and represents a very aesthetically
pleasing project to this evolving rim of the downtown area of Clearwater.
Criteria 3: The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons
residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
Response: Increased safety will result due to the increasing the access driveway width from 12 feet
to 24 feet at Fort Harrison Avenue for shared use by the proposed office and the
adjoining north office building. This improvement will also provide for proper fire
• ORIGINAL
Project Narrative (081-006.200) RECEIVED
Magnolia Park Office & Townhomes NOV 2 3 2005
11/22/05
Page 4 of 6 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
access and increase the site vision triangle for exiting vehicles onto Fort Harrison
Avenue.
Criterion 4: The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Response: Traffic congestion will not be increased due to dual access providing proper traffic
movement.. (Also refer to Application). The existing property is a sea of pavement from
building-to-building, with no curbing, parking striping, wheel stops, etc. The proposed
project will create access, parking and circulation in accordance with FDOT and City
Standards for both vehicles and pedestrians. With a center bi-directional lane on South
Fort Harrison Avenue, left turn storage and movements can occur fluidly into the site via
Fort Harrison Avenue driveway or Magnolia Avenue.
Criteria 5: The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
Response: (refer to Application). In addition, the proposed 2-story office building blends a
residential feel with the proposed townhomes by utilizing similar windows, beveled
siding, pitched metal roofing and by hiding the parking behind the structure and away
form general public view.
Criteria 6: The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual,
acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties.
Response: (refer to Application)
(10) COMPREHENSIVE 1NFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA:
Criteria 1: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is
otherwise eeonemieally impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards;
Response: The uses proposed are Professional Office in the C District and Residential Townhomes
in the O District of the subject property, both of which are low intensity uses when
contemplating all uses allowed in these Districts. In fact, the proposed project complies
with the maximum FAR and Density allowed in the respective Districts. Hence, the
Applicant is only requesting deviations from buffers widths, structural and pavement
setbacks, and parking (one space) to achieve the proposed project layout. Without these
deviations, the project cannot be successful.
Criteria 2: The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties;
Response: Overall, the project should add approximately 4 to 5-million dollars to the tax rolls
versus the .$250,000 assessment which currently exists and Magnolia Park represents a
very aesthetically pleasing project to this evolving rim of the downtown area of
Project Narrative (081-006.2000
Magnolia Park Office & Townhomes
11/22/05
Page 5 of 6
. ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 2 3 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Clearwater. Along with the adjacent Harbor Oaks Townhome project, the applicant
expects to see property values grow and spur additional development in the area.
Criteria 3: The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise
permitted in the City of Clearwater;
Response: North of the project is the Harbor Oaks Townhomes. West of the project is the Pinellas
Trail and Druid Office Park. South of the project is an existing office building and a
newly proposed mixed use project on Commercial Zoned property. West of the project is
specialty retail and professional offices with residential single family homes further west.
Hence, the Magnolia Park project proposes very compatible and comparable uses, of
which are prevalent in many areas of Clearwater.
Criteria 4: The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are
compatible with adjacent land uses;
Response: North of the project is the Harbor Oaks Townhomes. West of the project is the Pinellas
Trail and Druid Office Park. South of the project is an existing office building and a
newly proposed mixed use project on Commercial Zoned property. West of the project is
specialty retail and professional offices with residential single family homes further west.
Hence, the Magnolia Park project proposes very compatible and comparable uses, of
which are prevalent in many areas of Clearwater.
Criteria 5: Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the
comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City
of Clearwater;
Response: (See Application for Response)
Criteria 6: The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill
redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed
for development;
Response: (See Application for Response)
Criteria 7: The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a
form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a
whole;
Response: (See Application for Response)
Criteria 8: Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking
are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of
the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole;
Response: (See Application for Response)
Project Narrative (081-006.200)
Magnolia Park Office & Townhomes
11/22/05
Page 6 of 6
ORIGINAL.
RECEIVED
NOV 2 3 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Criteria 9: Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared
parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street
parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development;
Response: (See Application for Response)
Criteria 10: The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Dowtown District
design Guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable).
Response: (See Application for Response)
CAS
.jL
DATE RECEIVED:
p Planning and Development Services
r 100 South Myrtle Avenue
t RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
Clearwater, Florida 33756
earwa
e ATLAS PAGE
Telephone: 727-562-4567 ZONING DISTRICT:
U Fax: 727-562-4576 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORTH: /
? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED ANO NOTARIZEn APPLICATION SOUTH: /
WEST: /
? SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan EAST: /
0RIbIICI)
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
(Revised 9/19/2001)
D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER: < -1 I nc
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
ALL owners)
FAXNUMBER: c1?-?,) c7--1C) -1go l
C ki2? brr, nor -t'PC /Y?(,-
AGENT NAME: (Contact Person)
MAILING ADDRESS: C Il(? S+. C YO r ilek- FL 3 315&
PHONE NUMBER: ?. 7 ^I ) Q_gOD FAX NUMBER: 23I 1-?- 0 - CI D SO
The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or
Level Two Approval} as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plan eM-
3 renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addi pr
ovided on this worksheet:
NOV 0 8 2005
Architectural Theme.
PLANNING ?DEPARTMENT
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a rf OF R TER
theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed fort a development.
L
! OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel
proposed for development under the-minimum landscape standards.
2
ORIGINAL
3. Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will
enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
2 [U)
-?ECSVED
NOV 0 8 2005
pLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so
that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
ru
4. Property Values. The landscapement proposed in the Comprehensive LOcape Program will have a
beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5
Please return checklist for review and verification.
6. That (Itwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, day of
this
r?C?LS? personally appeared who having been first duly sworn
De oses and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that a/shhe' smed. /,
My Commission Expires:
Rosalie G. McGinnis
My Commission DOI %530
or ?a Expires May 16, 2007
S: application forms/development review/comprehensive landscape program application.doc
Notary Public
RECEVED
NOY 0 8 2005
PLANNING (DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 3 of 3
Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape
Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and
adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
TE41??0
CITY OF CLEARWATER
APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES -BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
APPLICANT'S NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
AGENT NAME
ADDRESS
(1a?? ala ' t goo FAX NUMBER :(:zID) atG - 19 O
Same aS above)
FAX NUMBER :
Mko eouy - QQA CI??Yt?t?lt2r FL ,im5(o
I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS
representations made in this application Sworn o and subscribed before me this eday of
are true and accurate to the best of my , A.D. V to me and/or
knowledge.
by /jZjf42 _) J4 who is personally known to
me or has produced
as id on.
C
Signat re or r p tativ Notary blic ?,. Rosalie G.MoGWoft
my commission expires:
V \j Io7r- Expires May 16, 2007
Fourteen (14) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted.
The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale
not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information:
NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; ORIGINAL
TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED;
NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT;
IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES;
EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS;
PROPOSED STREET NAMES;
NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS;
On E CC- E ? V E D
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Page 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER
•
DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING:
•
THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT
STREETS
RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS;
COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV Q 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 2
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR
PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576
INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL OF
FINAL PLAT INSTRUCTIONS
The final plat shall be suitable for recording at the office of the clerk of the circuit court. 11
shall be prepared and sealed buy a land surveyor registered by the state and shall conform
with the requirements of Florida Statute, Chapter 177, and the requirements of this
subsection. It shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals 50 feet or other scale determined
appropriate by the city engineer. The overall sheet size of the plat shall be consistent with the
standards established by the clerk of the circuit court for recording. Each sheet shall be
provided with a one-inch margin on each of three sides and a three-inch margin on the left
side of the plat for binding purposes.
Eighteen (18) copies of the Final Plat must be submitted. ORIGINAL
ALL FINAL PLATS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
NAME OF PLAT;
LOCATION OF THE PLAT BY U.S. SURVEY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING SECTION,
TOWNSHIP, RANGE, COUNTY AND STATE;
NAMES OF EXISTING STREETS ABUTTING RO GIVING ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT;
ALL PLAT BOUNDARIES BASED ON AN ACCURATE TRANSVERSE, WITH ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR
DIMENSIONS SHOWN. ERROR OF ENCLOSURE OF SUCH BOUNDARY SURVEY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT
FOR EACH 10,000 FEET OF PERIMETER SURVEY;
ALL BLOCKS, LOTS, STREETS, CROSSWALKS, EASEMENTS AND WATERWAYS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO
THE PLAT, ALL OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS GIVEN AND ALL RADII,
INTERNAL ANGLES, BEARINGS, POINTS OF CURVATURE, TANGENTS AND LENGTHS OF ALL CURVES, SO THAT
NO DIMENSIONS OR DATA ARE MISSING WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF ANY
OF THE CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES OF BLOCKS, LOTS OR STREETS, AS LISTED ABOVE. WHEN ANY LOT OR
PORTION OF THE PLAT IS BOUNDED BY AN IRREGULAR LINE, THE MAJOR PORTION OF THAT LOT OR PLAT
SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A WITNESS LINE SHOWING COMPLETE DATA, WITH DISTANCES ALONG SUCH LINES
EXTENDED BEYOND THE ENCLOSURE TO THE IRREGULAR BOUNDARY SHOWN WITH AS MUCH CERTAINTY
AS CAN BE DETERMINED OR AS "MORE OR LESS", IF VARIABLE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT. TRUE ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHALL BE DRAWN TO THE NEAREST
ESTABLISHED OFFICIAL MONUMENTS, NOT LESS THAN THREE OF WHICH SHALL BE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED
ON THE PLAT. THE INTENDED USE OF ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED.
CURVILINEAR LOTS SHALL SHOW ARC DISTANCES, AND RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING. RADIAL LINES
SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED. DIRECTION OF NONRADIAL LINES SHALL BE INDICATED;
SUFFICIENT ANGLES AND BEARINGS SHALL IDENTIFY THE DIRECTION OF ALL LINES AND SHALL BE SHOWN
TO THE NEAREST SECOND;
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
Page 3 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0 0 ORIGINAL
ALL RIGHT-OFrtNAY CENTERLINES SHALL BE SHOWN WITH DISTANCES, ANGLES, BEARINGS OR AZIMUTH,
POINTS OF CURVATURE, POINTS OF TANGENCY, POINTS OF REVERSE CURVATURE, POINTS OF COMPOUND
CURVATURE, ARC DISTANCE, CENTRAL ANGLES, TANGENTS, RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING OR
AZIMUTH, OR BOTH
ALL EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES OR UTILITIES, AND ANY LIMITATIONS
OF SUCH EASEMENTS;
ALL LOT NUMBERS AND LINES. LOT LINES SHALL BE MARKED WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS IN FEET AND
HUNDREDTHS OF FEET, AND BEARINGS OR ANGLES TO STREET LINES;
ACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY AREA TO BE DEDICATED OR RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE WITH THE
PURPOSE INDICATED THEREON;
TITLE, DATE OF SURVEY, GRAPHIC SCALE OF MAP AND NORTH ARROW. THE BEARING OR AZIMUTH
REFERENCE SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT IN THE NOTES OR LEGEND;
PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF
THE SATE OF FLORIDA;
EACH PLAT SHALL SHOW A DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS PLATTED, AND THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE THE
SAME IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATION. THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE SO COMPLETE THAT FROM IT, WITHOUT
REFERENCE TO THE PLAT, THE STARTING POINT AND BOUNDARY CAN BE DETERMINED;
THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND THE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SEAL; ALL
SECTION LINES AND QUARTER SECTION LINES OCCURRING IN THE MAP OR PLAT SHALL BE INDICATED BY
LINES DRAWN UPON THE MAP OR PLAT, WITH APPROPRIATE WORDS AND FIGURES. IF THE DESCRIPTION
IS BY METES AND BOUNDS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING SHALL BE INDICATED, TOGETHER WITH ALL BEARINGS
AND DISTANCES OF THE BOUNDARY LINES. IF THE PLATTED LANDS ARE IN A LAND GRANT OR ARE NOT
INCLUDED IN THE SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT SURVEYS, THEN THE BOUNDARIES ARE TO BE DEFINED BY
METES AND BOUNDS AND COURSES. THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE TIED TO THE
NEAREST GOVERNMENT CORNER OF OTHER RECORDED AND WELL-ESTABLISHED CORNER;
ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAT TITLE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE OR, IF
UNPLATTED, LAND SHALL BE SO DESIGNED. IF THE AREA PLATTED IS A REPLATTING OF A PART OR THE
WHOLE OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT, SUFFICIENT TIES SHALL BE SHOWN TO CONTROLLING LINES
APPEARING ON THE EARLIER PLAT TO PERMIT AN OVERLAY TO BE MADE AND REFERENCE TO THE
REPLATTING SHALL BE STATED AS A SUBTITLE FOLLOWING THE NAME OF THE PLAT WHEREVER IT APPEARS
ON THE PLAT;
ALL LOTS SHALL BE NUMBERED EITHER BY PROGRESSIVE NUMBERS OR, IF IN BLOCKS, PROGRESSIVELY
NUMBERED OR LETTERED IN EACH BLOCK, EXCEPT THAT BLOCKS IN NUMBER ADDITIONS BEARING THE
SAME NAME MAY BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY THROUGHOUT THE SEVERAL ADDITIONS;
PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PARCELS SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED;
ALL INTERIOR EXCEPTED PARCELS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND LABELED "NOT A PART OF THIS
PLAT";
THE PURPOSE OF ALL AREAS DEDICATED MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED OR STATED ON THE PLAT;
WHEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SHOW CURVE DETAIL INFORMATION ON THE MAP, A TABULAR FORM MAY
BE USED. E®
NOV Q 8 2005
Page 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTAI ION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH rHE FINAL PLAT:
A TITLE OPINION OF AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE SATE OR A CERTIFICATION BY AN ABSTRACTOR OR A
TITLE COMPANY STATING THAT THE COURT RECORDS IDENTIFY THAT THE TITLE TO THE LAND AS
DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAT IS IN THE NAME-OF THE PERSON EXECUTING THE DEDICATION. IN
ADDITION, A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CONSENT TO PLATTING OF LANDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE
SHALL BE FILED TOGETHER WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR EACH PERSON OR CORPORATION
HOLDING A MORTGAGE ON ALL LAND INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, WHERE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT SIGNED THE
FINAL PLAT. THE TITLE OPINION OR CERTIFICATION SHALL SHOW ALL MORTGAGES NOT SATISFIED OR
RELEASED OF RECORD NOR OTHER WISE TERMINATED BY LAW;
CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THAT THE PLAT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY
THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT ALL THE NECESSARY SURVEY MONUMENTS, LOT SIZES AND LOT DIMENSIONS ARE
CORRECTLY SHOWN THEREON, AND THAT THE PLAT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS
OF CHAPTER 177 AND THIS DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPRESSED ON THE PLAT AND AFFIXED THERETO SHALL
BE THE PERSONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE TO THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR INCLUDING THE
REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE SURVEYOR, BY WHOM OR UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION THE
PLAT WAS PREPARED;
A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PLATTED LANDS. HOWEVER, A NEW BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR A REPLAT IS
REQUIRED ONLY WHEN THE REPLAT AFFECTS ANY BOUNDARY OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED PROPERTY
OR WHEN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE LANDS TO BE REPLATTED OR ADJOINING LANDS. THE
BOUNDARY SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED AND PREPARED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE DIRECTION AND
SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PRECEDING THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF
THE PLAT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT RESTRICT A LEGAL ENTITY FROM
EMPLOYING ONE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PERFORM AND PREPARE THE BOUNDARY
SURVEY AND ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PREPARE THE PLAT, EXCEPT THAT
BOTH THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND THE PLAT MUST BE UNDER THE SAME LEGAL ENTITY;
CERTIFICATION THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID;
EVERY PLAT OF A SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM FILED FOR RECORD SHALL INCLUDE ANY REQUIRED
DEDICATION BY THE APPLICANT. THE DEDICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY ALL OWNERS HAVING A RECORD
INTEREST IN THE LAND BEING PLATTED, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
EXECUTED. ALL MORTGAGEES HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND PLATTED SHALL EXECUTE, IN THE
SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED, EITHER THE DEDICATION
CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OR IN A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT JOINING THE RATIFICATION OF THE PLAT AND
ALL DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS THEREON IN THE FORM OF A CONSENT TO PLAT FROM ALL
MORTGAGE INTERESTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEN A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND HAS
BEEN PLATTED AND A PLAT THEREOF BEARING THE DEDICATION EXECUTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND
APPROVAL OF THE CITY HAS BEEN SECURED AND RECORDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DIVISION, ALL
STREETS, ALLEYS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC AREAS SHOWN ON SUCH PLAT, UNLESS
OTHERWISE STATED, SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE BEEN DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE USES AND
PURPOSES STATED THEREON, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SEPARATE ACTION BY RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COMMISSION TO FORMALLY ACCEPT SUCH OFFERS OF DEDICATION;
ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRIVATE RESTRICTION AND TRUSTEESHIPS AND THEIR PERIODS OF
EXISTENCE SHALL BE FILED AS A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REFERENCE TO SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL
BE NOTED ON THE FINAL PLAT;
OVED
NOV o 8 2005
pIAANINC DEPARTMENT
CIN OF CIEARWATER
Page 5
AFTER A FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN&PROVED, THREE PRINTS OF AS-ET DRAWINGS SHOWING THE
IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE B CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO E APPROVED SUBDIVISION
CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETION OF REQUIRED
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE SUCH PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED.
FINANCIAL GUARANTEE: -UNLESS ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED,
AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY EVERY PLAT
WHICH IS TO BE RECORDED TO ENSURE THE ACTUAL SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF
ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN NOT MORE THAN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE
RECORDING, OR ONE YEAR IF SIDEWALKS ARE THE ONLY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT TO BE COMPLETED
FOLLOWING THE DATE OF RECORDING. AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS,
AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED IF THE CITY
ENGINEER DETERMINES IT APPROPRIATE AND MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME IN PROPORTION TO
THE WORK COMPLETED, AND MAY TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY;
CASH, TO BE HELD IN A SEPARATE ESCROW ACCOUNT BY THE CITY; OR
AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT WRITTEN BY A BANK CHARTERED BY THE SATE, THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT, OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE UNITED STATES IF THE BANK IS AUTHORIZED TO DO
BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT
SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER THINGS, AN EXPIRATION DATE NOT EARLIER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE
DATE OF ISSUANCE; A PROVISION REQUIRING THE ISSUER OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT TO GIVE AT LEAST 30
DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR- TO EXPIRATION OR RENEWAL OF THE LETTER; AND A
PROVISION THAT THE LETTER IS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQUALING ITS
ORIGINAL TERM OF THE REQUIRED NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN; OR
A SURETY BOND ISSUED BY A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE. THE SURETY
BOND SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE PROVISION REQUIRED FOR LETTERS OF CREDIT.
ORIGINAL
SAPlanning Department\Application Forms\development review\Plat Approval Application - 6-23-2001doc RECE VED
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Page 6
E
E
.?
x
?w
N
OO
nn
?G ®ry®Q
?? JUJ
??LL
? Z
LL 4 ?- 3
•
1?9
OO
C.11
N O R. 1 4 F- L LV A i10R
_A. 5 T E. L L V A 7 1 0 9
ryl
rn
T ^-
J
.A
U%
G
WEI
_. 0 Il-T_H E_ L r- V_ -A __Tj -0 It..
MIMI it ' ? ;'I III !
II?
Ii
R -?C
hi 7
I
II 4 r.r-R ??
li !!? I III
r
- ICI' Ii. -i. II .?
jil
II?r ' ; I
"PT
? N I Ti
i
®®
E A ` i i. lr IT JPC -
l a 1- )-1 7 1
Lill
RL C7 ;
p,r
}p N a-
U
a
T N
L L L. V A i f Q
k
S L. I L L '/t • i. e
i'
?I
e?
2pg?d
NL
II ? a
u ?y
G7
ORIGINAL
RECENED
SITE LEGEND
HANDICAP PARKING
PROPOSED ORANADE NLET
PRODOSED am
SITE 801mAAY UK
M ER UNE DF ROAD
R,wT-OF-WAY
EASING CORE 6 PAVELDrt
PROPOSED CONCRETE
TYPICAL
HANIRCAP
P PAANMD 9'ACEe
SIOEWAU(
S RA[m
LINEAR FEET -
SOUARE FEET
NiEiee0N1 QD]D1
1YP
NC
9/Y
RS
Ur
SF
GENERAL NOTES
I. NL aR9 TAD- ro BEY uN Em pn ,MsE
xoTm
z Au Eu®ro ITE e- w+ncAL aaReeRO.
1 ALL 0M 90IS ARE MEASURED FROM FACE OF
aRe.
STRIPING NOTES
I. TYPICAL PANIND SPACE 91AU. BE SRPFD
01H A 4' NHTTE 51NPE.
L SEE DETAL FOR HANDICAP PARNNG
SIGN LEGEND w
RI-I S10P >pW'
RYl RD TURN
R}I IEET E LANE MUST TURN l6f 24'R4'
RS-I 00 NOT ENTER
'
w ".w
ONE RAY
nADR ONLY N
3e'"I2'
2
ALL S 9CR A
ALL 5 SNNL TCM ro O YAxL,AL
UAL ON
Ula6CTY 11TAFFlC M CONIR0. OENaS
NOV 2 3 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
MIXED USE FAR A DENSITY CALCULATIONS
PROPERTY Is ZONED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
(MA)DMUM FAR - 0.55 AND MAXIMUM DENSITY - 24 OU/ACRE IN CO LAND USE).
PROPERTY ZONED OFFICE DISTRICT
(MAXIMUM FAR - 0.50 AND MAXIMUM DENSITY - 15 DU/ACRE IN R/OO LAND USE).
TOTAL PROJECT AREA 36,040 SF
LAND AREA ZONED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 10.184 SF
PERMITTED FAR N COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 0.55
FLOOR AREA PERMITTED IN COMMERCIAL OISTRICT(10,184 % 0.55) 5,601 SF
PROPOSED OFFICE GROSS FLOOR AREA IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 5,600 SF
LAND AREA UTILIZED FOR OFFICE IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (5,500/0.55) -10,000 SF
LAND AREA UTILIZED FOR TOYNHOMES IN C DISTRICT (10.184 - 10,000) .164 SF
DENSITY ALLOWED IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT 24 DU/ACRE
DWELLING UNITS ALLOWED IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (184/43565 • 24) - 0.101 DU
LAND AREA ZONED OFFICE DISTRICT 23,836 SF
DENSITY ALLOWED IN OFFICE DISTRICT 15 DU/ACRE
DWELLING UNITS ALLOWED IN OFFICE DISTRICT (25856/43565 r 15) - 8.904 DU
TOTAL NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PERMITTED ON OVERALL
PROPERTY (0.101 + 8.904) - 9,005 DU
TOTAL MA MUM PERMISSIBLE ON OVERALL PROPERTY IS 6,500 CFA OFFICE
PLUS NINE (9) DWELLING UHTS.
TOTAL PROPOSED OFFICE - 5.250 SF OFA
TOTAL PROPOSED TOVMIOMES - 9 DWELLING UNITS
HARBOR OAKS
PROJECT
(under construction)
ZONED "C" ZONED "0"
(0.2338 ACRES) 40.5936 ACRES) I I
^Ffl?.AS I
-s.W Po.1W? ?:_..?ul you. l='+O ?Ea uv- I"r...-.-
>? _a o
JQIr?R? 0
HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL
wEUO° wi""A
SCALE. I' - 20'
Tµpr m rAWMM
rlgplT
I I aiAY T,v?
Is-
Nn ?-RIi E R
. RNO r ? ? .R"" nm r.T
vA F?
lll_G:rr?1' ?
i uc°mN
HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL ,
V
4
W
OC
Y
d
J
z
9
Q?
a
J?
LL
a
a
J
Q
Z y
i7
?-.? [Films
W
F
4F
SHEET ND.
HARBOR OAKS
PROJECT
(under construction)
ZONED "C" ZONED "0"
(0.2338 ACRES) (0.5936 ACRES)
20' 9ta1T i..v .. ...........:... .... .......1.. .,...i U
MTORY
......._. ........
-,m, EROSION BUILDING BEGIN 91 lF OF GRAVITY
RETAINING
I; I I I . i v..,...i...i.i_,... i... ?.. ?_:... ,. _,... ?... ?..... p l", CONTROL c, WALL AND NANpf ARWHD POND
II CONTRACTOR TO f" _ _, ...... ........... PER NOD INOE%
7 O4y4 i, _
4 INSTALL az IF .
NOT OR WRe _,r IAk.b. ,n ' s I 6 f03•E(0
L..v.o?
60 ... ) ..K..q '.S I f426V 6027'
'K
LEWAY APRON II _: F F ,,?{?,? Neta-
11 OM I . -:. _ .... 9li... i... ._...2..I ... ?.....x...
I•
_ ti ....... -;T??... _
i
II NOT INDEX Sts t_ k_
LOT 3650
SHADED
AREA DEFITS
IIEROR __-___ __--_-- y_)I ? ON
4AmAREA 31.50 CONTROL
rl ?.. :.., i...:.. s....... i._?..i... i.I x.50 (TYP)
.S CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL
S ZA lF OF S• SIDEWALK eONCREIE - 32.50 1 ]Y 21]] lY u 7 ]r n ( ?
1 6 fll-1 • a• EERTICAL SEE OELLT 31-M I 17O.aY 1 i
k {' 71' YIIIIIE STOP BAR T CURB (TYP) DRY RETENTION
E ?n STORMWATE POND I I (5) TOWNHOME UNIT a•S S• 1.76' TO PAM71wD
eo IF OF DOUBLE ;y R36"\ YELLOW MP uNE ... - - - TT 3 STORY is
ke= I 8' YELLOW STRIPING 6• YERRCAL ro d1mE YENICLE / FFE a 36.6G• 6 I E
7 R6 (TIN ON
1 O g 9 HT 37 '-6"
P '..,fi J I• ne
S@ d (rn
k QI i• 1203' 31.T1' la. POE Rt ^o-p a' IA
_ I r sw II PROPOSED E (T s) AYP ?? I N PR,p Eic m + -= - -- -- r z oss a• WA 3w T
SPLASH PAO WALE
7G AONT II0.0]' E- , - 8 I 2S 0- :N1G-- _- I R6' t S FOR
a' ENTRY E[E
6,069 SF a flB
2 AROUND BUUWNOS ?? i
€ O~C ? I (µ YP) (5,250 SF GFA) S wA? ?? PROPOSED w INGa (M
nWws
l??L, Q rrr, 4a_T? I I -STORY $ s uDGHT ED POIE ?waoW% \ I • I I $ • w1A) DEAD M
T \IT6
II I ?:1-T 64.Pr SHADED POLE AREA JH
ITw°Na
z WOLE FOR 1 ^ I (TIN) 17.01 40. _I lER 7'C AREA S I gM RS R6•UQIT PdE
IT 3fl1Y Q2EFN AREA RE 1AE CANS Ie •6W9' TO PAVENENT
I -? H C STALL
k II ° I- I ROOF HT - 3P-0• 3 • ?n OETAIL saeAVpuro? Q:=i s IDUI RZO _ _ - - _ - !
(YEaANICAL EWIPNENT E T 1lJ THIS SHEET TW .J e'? L°'?• ':: ,': uuFrAl a ON RI-1
* S.a]• TO PA`?EYwT
?y sll 5 IN CUPOLA) `J E R1, ur NDP63 SAIX CURB-
o TO AEYwT ?n A??? y (4) TOWNji0ME UNITS
1!s 1r Oi GGUeIE?? 0l'. FFE 3r36.8' a
I: II y pe083ys(p•••?. .?:.?-•:
LF or 6• I.OZ' TO • YELLOW SRIPI
NOT GRAMTY WALL PAYEY U T 7W 9ONT 0i
c,
.E. .O4 TRIANGLE HT
naMo
3.. 1• WM1E STRIPE 3 P (TYP) ° I3 •-6"
ON _
li II I I:. MER, , WaaY 3]
73.
Za
_I LOT 5 ERGS'.
II II I II}...`..,._?...`_`..'BUILDIryG;._,._L...... ?... i...I wO to if Oi 6• u33*
II : , , I : I ;- . I NOT GRAM" WAIL
IL
- m
tl II I ' I _, I _,I cONTRa zG s y TRIANGLE O"W) d '. _ __ _ 1 .T'Y II
WtI1RACIDR UCNT
Tb CONS1iLUCT
PFTf =NOTINO IX I ---- ___ --_ - - - - _P_ !( 120 .
......... .. ... .. S a94{•1f• 6aA7'
E
H/C flAYP$ ` A r-^ - A-----? -_ - - - - - - CATED
J01 iA1N TRUER CONES 1 _-_?•_'-•-•_ - b , , -
S
-------------s----- =-=-`--- ' . 71.9'(F) A d •' k
e
:50EWAx, AND LE INTO EXISTING WRO 70 IF CF NOT TINE F CUR TYPE i CUA6 •
R71 70' 30 LL Qi T • Saa 0
R
e cunOl y Naa36'JYW
SHADED AREA OEPICI5736IF OF ASPNN.TroIE
ldq AilER iOINLEYAIN CONNECTION roETO511NG YAa1WE
? ME HYpNANT 71• NNIIE STOP BAR PROPOSED
E E HYDRANT MTS a R/W RESTORATION GNOLIA DRIVE IFI
OLLOYANO'OROEmAIN MSDAIIATIOt1 FIX HYDRANT
6 YELLOW STRIRNG A4111LT MYDIXI VIDIIO
\'n- MT IANgNG CONTRACTOR TO INSTAL
VVV - - - - - 81 LF Oi NOT VALLEY LTAi6 -- - -
rt --
???_ .. r?--- ------------.... -- ------ - -
RED
OR0
NOV 2 32005
PLANNING DEPARTNPEM
CITY OF CLEARWATER
EKED
HARBOR OAKS GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES
NOV 2 3 2005 PROJECT
a?aa dm„?, „,.Imba?m,»,,m .. a?a4 » ?a 8
under construction h<4iM'. ties d Ka a,J rnxax.
2. NPR>>h>•bc <waan 9m^mraPL»noleAmpn
3. p»»MV nxd brc YmgM tmM seem na.LW ywdbadn M mwe>.
4
L4b:eM beIWRPm Bat awlfe4 b,i--uelMmsa Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT .
.
5. 5>4 ArL be 95w wmf km 5[. A4+am nwaan,.ebard W w:Atlosa
;. ad-wed l
p edardr b » amP?bm»b ae w»
I I I I
CITY OF CLEAWWATER a
w N?repoard me laN?aP"wA4cl.
]. ub d,aM»?I tic Pm.n.dm4>. MU.m:»1aa-,n?..we eu is aa:wa
rams w W nw lamrapa ?a.Mm a m aes?tm4 rase.
>a>uwDweaadamDm
aurae da.n
x,tx:.aac
>m e
;.::.:...,_I ? ' '.::. I
_ _ ? Syr cau?iEYx'uL ? ( I N
.
9
?
9. "vm?•1>,raaba
pwxebrnr.d,LUj e,>pmewyanwaw.>an t
I
bit L--? O1 r1-t •:yl alana,,,,e
Y a • ' (? >'1'e>n>L rat a aa>aed m ue prgen.
vorw ax,tx•»rmcaa mr..en,>a:>..>emsremwpl»,>e>pacau.„,,.
i
'
_
?
Y 1 1 `.j ??Y'L.i.l...<<i.l _ ?.:.ti
i.i. t.
' z. nw°seal»a>r?u:e>m,rca.anw9ra.tow>>Idxo- e.•u ?mw
w
wMMWam•blrlcm.
I i ?.L. _?_:...•_.. ... ._ _ .
.
•
_, _y lei S
13 L.ro>:aP.? dr ra.d= :,r?»wyxe w4 rrawrd ,myu:w bpw4.y»
•
,
:a.
L ?.l::?
L
.
L
i
L
.
Y
f '• LJ ri;yl?MWmVeCabaau>M:n^+aYatl iaa'Ntta°.iam,b Mlfin b,pmadd90 dwab
?.P
M O
`
?
I .....r .... .........
..r.
_
.
-
.
_
-
.
'
f? qi
(s) T0
t1
•
-
?
w
Nw
?P
1' r? 5 uic lnNwRfo4tlv
wl»Y
I??n braw?va'vi0:m q.m..>r?
dM4eiamee> rD» 5i'?? dJ eetrMeebae la'?r'F
a:n l.d>?pr
w 4
a
,
i Q 3
'
. ,
- $
T{
lR
niE
ale
Y -
TO Y a n te] ze,o. f
- FFE - 36.60'
I
NT - V-5'
IN FERTILIZATION
I Ibl I
4 .
'. I ?
... Nrubs
( 1 IB 1
•
_"L•'c..r,.->.. W
'va
"-''"
"'-
I 25 I ??? , ??......a•? c. .._? -
r 11 1FI ``I
3 md>MAn>MI 20.159 NGa> »d priorb
wdAC mlbuumWGla. a,Ueta>M be rl.?eA Ne and WR, A}Ia UUIeMVm:
ne draw rwa bi
Y
il l
?
.
M
6.069 SF 36 I 20 I I 20 I r
(5.250 ?GFA) A ?? UAM JV Application
'
o
N
f
1 I 1
3
FFE - 37
00
" ICo.av:
I .21
S
41
ey nw o f7
.
?I
3
I
:. ?? G
:
dLai
?' I
- -
4i
•
I
- - u
m
.7it»?
d: IYr
a
du
A
{ 1 i
?
• :
I _ _? _ _
0
u
? vw ro
r
w
Pn
1 ? k 4
_ - -
ICB
TIN
C I IN
I
'(.
I G dM av A-
,
'
E. I
?
ie _ e@
_ I
el;
III hIB I
Oa UNITS
"` I Is 7 {) T03
96NMT01FY
1
• : ` ?ry m»eHL rcrme btama:.:tl:
Omagtt.::c Nrax lanunpwNanWa
?
1
15j,.o, -
3
I
1
Pl 11 + i N F o wd, I I m FFE . 36.80' tt
riv
I P T -13 -Sa I ?:
,e 1 I - t L.. '.\
4 6
u
•
>
li
I I I .,
I I I ^, ._ LBNLRG
3
?
L
I l l s 1
I I: IB 6O L 5 6
Q ?, Itl
II
1
..
r
wos-•
61 ai. __ _ tMM_ _ __ w _Jm£0'J_ -
I
II :
..
:
•
:
: C
I .....
.. .
...._... .. t
. ... ..
.
... .. .•. .. ..
al .. ..
w?
l 1. `:
..,. -, GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES Q E b
I -------- --------------
i 15 11 3e 15 S J ._
C
11 JP it roM jr J
ONOLIA DRIVE (F) l
I s irnarravoolr LesLes I. Install a sew automatic Imgatlw sNtem to proaMe I Od6 revenge W an landsape are>9.
2 ShM rise's shah be used m mass t R
es or
hed
lan
h
11
t
d
d
G
Y
b
th O to
O.
l ?w r 4 11 1
.r.::::::.:::::.::::::__.::::::,::_::::::::
...»...,?,..-.....,. .. _ ... ... ............. ____
F
___
__
-
p
g
rigs.
nen s
a
ro
e
more
un
m
a
orc
e
ironsb11W ahelgM d? slull>edWe 40 pipe orated black. Inro nx stall Ynb nxrs be
plant.
Yrrn llways, drw..por o they may damaged.
C tL
r4
?
_
._.... ___. _ ,..........._
, o<.r
_ _ _•
_ - - - - - - - -
-------
a! aloe
3. All heads metalled n plant.9 9waIles, dive and Aa pa n9 tits slMll be 12' pop-up feed spray .
a
i
1
I:
heads. N hods shat be msulkd wit, ft top of the sprry body 11,61, wth finch grade. AN Snomll er area (
?
Ld
fival be -gated well 12' P.Fw fired spray head, and ed- » regwed.
4. . M soM sodded areas >lire be :mgated with 4' pW.vp 'uP Wray NraY heads or pop-up sear dmen heads index
_
t?
otherwise speohed.
5. Pipe, ,A- and other arigabon a ppe ent may be shwa in dme5, walls or boldngs for Canty ody. instal
an valves and Wier equpmdrt m landscape bed5 for best aco ssibli and corcolment. 0
ILL U
_
0 z G. Valves 5Ufl be installed in a mamldd wlhm a wive bra W sut-. sac to scents Al valves within the boa.
Valve bra slMl be fins from a:
dcbn
whdl ma
r
l
P
d
3' d
th
h
d
f
y
y Goe
s
e
ves.
ro-
e a
ep
grx
Sump at t
e bottom o
I. he pd.
l
1" = 20'
S
0" 7. M migabw equipment and -tallabon tedniq- span meet IedeM, state and Ii codes, regdabo,6 and
c
ca
e
-
SHRUB PUNTING DtTA1L ordinances.
- 8. M Sur If- heads and all heads a" wall*, crabs, dines and pa l.4 areas steal be meta led on flewble
swing
s ? E
?. ds
andfueds
nynW9,wnbeln,anedo 9e
anteawnwhero
Prea
dne
osvbe
ltaton vV 0
I
IR
IGATION SY
TE p
p
.
p
P
rates and head type Na iM be com
atible widen each Zone 2 L
E PROTECTION Di E1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL
E) TR
R
S
M REQUIREMENTS p
.
10
G
d
I
h
ll
t b
bl
h
d
d
b
b
f
n
l
.
ex
men
n?
z s
a
no
e ms
n a
iu
e
area ar
e ms
a
ed w nxn a
we poszble.
I I
Cwtr.IW dull b
m
nt
h
d
l )
1. 5hallow wells. open surface water bodies, or reclaimed water must be used as a source of .
e
ou
e
as s
own on p
an
12
N sleeves sluff be 5dieduk 40
e wn11ed a mmvm
m
f 14' bd
r
d
51
h
t b
l
l
d
nmgabon water. The distribution system for Imgation must not be connected to -ty or
m
Unless it an be demonstrated that these 9AVree9 are not available
Plant Materlal5 5ehed ul e Uniopel water sources .
pp
u
o
o
,g
a
e.
a
on
Y
-5 s
e use
to °° a "W a '^ Pt °n line
s thrwgh' Sbe"es h A not be used as a dW to convey water d-0 the
Qwnbty Code ttdamcal Name Common Name Specification 5pacing
14 NIB Mib»ci» spp. h4wsciu 3 gal., 24' a 24' 3P o.c. ,
.
2. irrigation systems must ut,lue low volume design such as low trajectory heads or 5oaker
hoses to de direct a bon and low rn bon
t
ms that
th
- de
ore S
r
r
t d
s system.
13. Adjust all heads to prwde maomum coverage and elk.rcy and nmmnue overthrow. Imgabw heads shall
not Spray oau woes, dr- or airy When man- Wted erns.
^
n
ICs ea comub twfordn Burford Hdy 3 gal.. 24'. 24' 2B' o.c.
51 Il
l0 IC Ilea p»iile 1 holy 1 z' ht
x 4' W
z 1/2' cal .
p
p
o
wen
a
o
y
p
ry a
cs
not regnrc Imgation• such as paved areas will not be acceptable. High lmgabon need areas
nuf
14. stealx xtured , Toro,'RanAlyd' a Tiiadti' or as GUnenw?x stated on the
E9'"P^?d h' plans.
..
.
.
5
p
'
'
' must not overopray low need areas. 15. Contractor 51un fie
ld w.rfy water sonce to ddwcr the proper prnsure• p mds per 5quare inch (p56 and
4
J
Jnapenis par5omi r-irs Jumper 3 gal., 12
ht. a 1 B
>pr. 30
o.c.
'
'
watu now, gallon per mirofe (GPMI a5 regwed by the vngatm system. NWny the lmdscape Ardnted d there _ __
a.
spr., 2 I/2
5 L 1 tagrntromw ,Mia Grape Myrtle I o ht. x 4
al. 3. Nigh water demand landscape areas Such as turf mint be served by a separate ,mgabon is any d1Sf?q-y. L A N D S C A P E
50 IOM bnope Maxon A - Grass I gal., 12- ht.. 12' sI,r. I B' o.c.
'
' zone than low water need areas, such as planter beds, or mulched areas with trees. In no case, 16. N permits req med for metalat- s1e11 be provided by the contractor. ARCHITECTS
13 Me Myrica omfera Wan Myrtle e
ht.. e>pr.• 2 112
.1. shall any planted vegetation area be more than 50' from a water supply hose bib. l7. Rder W the landscape Plate when locating an ungatwn equipment. Afi w ample room near- imgabco
fries Lamy Bdve -
243 POM Podw?rpu> spp. Po carpus 3 gal., 24' ht.. 24'Wr. 39o- equp-,t for the proper installation of trees, shnbs am Who work Shown on drawnlgs to be retalcl. Palm IhAw, F1oN,.Haw
2 RE Rh celea 10 I., 42' ht.. 24' s
ape c lady Pram ga pr.
q. At-,t,. nmganan systems must operate by an nmgatnon controller capable of 18. N wives shag be aetalied in wive sleeves. - Pmn> Tr na.n4o
F. m n!4a12
86 RI Raphwlepi> ., fiction hawthom 3 gal., I e' ht.. 18' Wt. 30'.... ddferentutmg between Schedules of high and low water demands areas. Controllers must have 19. Contractor shoe be re5pernlMe fa a0 items w the pbn and nrvgatnn speafratwn. Ia al
Am
M-
SP Sabel paImetto Gbbage Palm I D 'A. I O .c.
2 o
mullsplC cycle start apoutY and flexible calendar program able [o be set to comply
with foal
a
20. Contactor chap m5tmct the owxr on the fWl tron and mantevnce d the m Gan 5
open 9a y i sn
NwM1,y
450 TJN read el vermum -1 Dwad Confederate Jasmine I gal., D' ht.. 12' spr. 16' o.c. or water management district Imposed restrictions.
0 21. Canbadw sbl be rnpansdNe for al NW repays or adjustmeids to praLde proper coveraV ge to to an Gma-4 neem?-b
63 TJV Tr-,"... I.smimde> Var. Confcderate Jasmine 3 gat., 12' ht.. 18'spr. 30' o.c.
'
'
Automatic nm
5
abon s
stems must be e
m
ed with a rain sensor deice or switch which will 2m2. qu. N M q.estreas.ions regarding Imgation apeoflatiom hall be directed to the landsra
2pe Architect at (727)
foe
no, ume
14 v5 v,bmm,iw svspensum 5andankwa vibn- 3 gal., 24
ht.. 24
spr. 3a o.c.
2 UA Ulmin abG On 12' m.. 4'spr., 2 112'.1. .
g
y
pp
g
ovemde the nmgabon cycle of µe sprinkler 5y'Stem when adequate rainfall has -d. 787-2840. SHEFT
L
I
-
22?
Epp
9
'a
34=
4O
i N
9 oe
oC
Cy
S?
II
?i
II
I?
II
li
II
II
it
ii
.=
comma
----------------------------------
ORIGINAL.
RECENED
NOV 2 3 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
•
0
5 CM-W E
HARBOR OAKS
PROJECT
(under construction)
Z Z Y\^^u/\j?J1'
O
00
- - Y
Q
a c°r? r--?
I '.
I?
I I. I . It .11of'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I N- •:. I I I .
n 5
0 z -M
(D
M
C
(lV,\ G6?JJJ\///JJJI
n
T T
Co
u L! (J
a
c
n
T r7Y
a.
J
I-
ORIGINA4
?t
- d rrr-
Nov 0 8 2005
Q
J
A
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
U
n
m
0- o °.
CD
m
i+ O
^'
°
10
m o
C."
M
D .
m
r
u
oZ
T o
C
m
C?
?,
mm y
T7 00
=
C
° m
;3 m v
0
;U
J--.
F-
I n n _: -
n
Oz z ? ?'
0 (D
m
00
m m
;oz
r
f
E
3
j
Ile, A
Project Name: Magnolia Park (Hupp Office and Townhomes)
Address: 907 South Fort Harrison Avenue
City/State: Clearwater, Florida
TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS
The project will be a mix of the following Residential and Commercial and uses:
Proposed Land Use
Magnolia Park Townhomes
Professional Office
Proposed Land Use
Magnolia Park Townhomes
Professional Office
ITE ITE
Land Use Description
230 Residential Condominum/Townhouse
710 General Office Building
ITE ITE
Land Use Description
230 Residential Condominum/Townhouse
710 General Office Building
ITE
Average
Peak Hour
Trip Rate (AM)
0.25
1.55
ITE
Average
Peak Hour
Trip Rate (PM)
0.31
1.49
Engineer:
Date:
(du or SF)
ITE
Rate
Units
dwelling unit
6069
(du or SF)
ITE
Rate
Units
dwelling unit
6069
ITE (du or SF)
Average ITE
ITE ITE Weekday Rate
Proposed Land Use Land Use Description Trip Rate Units
Magnolia Park Townhomes 230 Residential Condominum/Townhouse 5.66 dwelling unit
Professional Office 710 General Office Building 11.01 6069
The above calculations suggest that the proposed mixed use project will not generate 100 TRIPS in the Peak AM or PM hours
The above calculations suggest that the proposed mixed use project will not generate 1,000 DAILY TRIPS on a Weekday.
Therefore, a detailed Traffic Impact Assessment should not be required for the project.
D
O
no
n
0
-
MM o
Oo
C=
o
cr fey
P79
M
Z
4
Scott Lincoln, PE c/o LA CIVIL
09/29/05
Estimated
Trips
uantit Generated
9 2.25
6.2 9.5697
11.8197 < 100 VPH
GOOD
Estimated
Trips
uantit Generated
9 2.79
6.2 9.19926
11.98926 < 100 VPH
GOOD
Estimated
Trips
uantit Generated
9 52.74
6.2 67.97574
120.71574 < 1,000 VPD
GOOD
0
•
•
E
•
ArVIL
Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc.
STORMWATER DESIGN NARRATIVE
The proposed Magnolia Park Offices and Townhomes Project is proposed as a Mixed Used
project on the subject property owned by Magnolia Park Realty, LLC and BKB Properties, Inc.
located at 907 South Fort Harrison Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756. The property is
presently comprised of three parcels containing an office building, asphalt parking, a partially
abandoned/filled drainage ditch and grassed area.
The Site Data on the Cover Sheet of the Plans outlines the Existing and Proposed impervious and
pervious areas. LA Civil has design the Stormwater Management System (Dry Retention Pond
with Engineered Under Drain, as depicted on Sheet 5 of the Plans, and has prepared the attached
drainage calculations in accordance with the City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Manual.
Hence, have calculated a weighted predevelopment coefficient of runoff for the existing
conditions and applied a redevelopment reduction factor of 50% to yield C(pre) = 0.4029. The
post development C(post) = 0.7932 was calculated based on analysis of the proposed impervious
and pervious conditions. By applicant the differential C = (0.7932 -0.4029) = 0.3903 in the
equation Q = CiA, for the entire property area a = 0.8274 acres and for the 3.7" 25-year 1-hour
rainfall, we calculated an allowable post development discharge of Q(pre) = Q(post) =1.23 cfs.
The post development discharge of Q = 1.23 cfs was then utilized to size the control structure
with a 4.5 inch rectangular weir. The subject outfall structure S-55 is detailed in the calculations
and the Plans.
In addition, the required pond volume was calculated to be V = (1.23 cfs x 1 hour * 3600
sec/hour) = 4,301 CF.
The proposed pond will provide the required storage capacity between elevations 31.5' and 35.5'
and a 6-inch freeboard height will be provided via a vertical curb around the top of bank at
elevation 36.0'
According to the design calculations and permit documents on file at the City of Clearwater for
the adjacent Harbor Oaks project, a half inch of water quality treatment is already being provide
for the Magnolia Park property in the Harbor Oaks pond. Hence, water quality treatment should
not be required.
However, it should be noted that the project will in-fact provide water quality treatment via a 6-
inch underdrain system. The required half-inch treatment volume for the project was calculated
to be 1,502 CF. However, since the 4.5-inch weir will be placed at elevation 34.5' which is 3
feet above the pond bottom of 31.5', treatment of 2,756 CF of stormwater will occur with 23.51
hours.
ORIGI
NOV o 8 2005
PLANNING ODE , Street • Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph: (727) 446-900(01 IM ERE-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS
Project: MAGNOLIA PARK (HUPP OFFICE BLDG & (9) TOWNHOMES)
Address: 907 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVENUE
POND 2:
STAGE INCREM. INCREM. CUMUL.
ELEV AREA VOLUME VOLUME
31.5 508
Pond Bottom 32.5 764.00 636 636
33.5 1052.00 908 1544
34.5 1372.00 1212 2756
DHW Elev: 35.4986 1722.50 1545.046 4301.046
35.5 1723.00 1547.5 4303.5
36.0 1723.00 861.5 5165
DHW STORAGE PROVIDED = 4301.046
TOTAL STORAGE AVAILABLE = 4303.5
FREEBOARD= 0.50 feet
n
oz
T2
o
C M
n
, O ??®
i ¦
n m
I L" M
m
;0 v
I
MAX DISCHARGE & REQUIRED POND STORAGE:
Q = delta C * I * A [units: cfs]
Volume = Q * 3600 seconds (1-HOUR)
C(post) = 0.7932 [coefficient]
50% C(pre) = 0.4029 [coefficient]
delta C = 0.3903 [coefficient]
I = 3.70 [inches of rainfall]
A = 0.8274 [basin area; acres]
Q(post) = delta C*I*A
Q(post) = 1.19 CFS
Req'd Pond Volume = 4301.25 CF
Q(pre) = C(pre)*I*A
Q(pre) = 1.23 CFS
DERIVATION OF C(p ost):
(SF)
Type Area % of Basin
Impervious Area = 28505 79.09%
Pervious Area = 5812.50 16.13%
DRY Pond 1 Top Area = 1722.50 4.78%
WET Pond 2 Top Area = 0 0.00%
Basin Area = 36040 100.00%
REQUIRED WIER:
3628 Q = C * L * H^1.5 [CFS)
3628 C = 3.30 [coefficient]
L= 0.37 ft 4.5 inches
h = 1.00 ft
Q= 1.23 CFS < Q(pre); GOOD
Weir Crest = 34.50 ft-NGVD (at 1/2" treatment volume)
1501.667 CF
Treatment Volume = 1501.67 CF
Provided = 2756.00 CF
CD
Page 1
M
r?
DRAINAGE CALCS.xIs
Runoff Weighted
Coeff. C ost)
0.95 0.7514
0.20 0.0323
0.20 0.0096
1.00 0.0000
0.7932
•
0
• •
STORMWATER WORK SHEET 7/25/2005 PAGE 5
PROJECT NAME: MAGNOLIA PARK (HUP OFFICES & (9) TOWNHOMES)
PROJECT NUMBER: 081-006 r
FILENAME: UNDERDRN.XLS 7/25/05 06:23 PM ORIGINAL
UNDERDRAIN STAGE-DISCHARGE & TIME (POND 1)
UNDERDRAIN TOTAL LENGTH = 43 ft. NO. OF RUNS = 1
DIAMETER = 6 in. SLOPE = 0.20 %
LOWEST INVERT = 30.86 AVERAGE INVERT = 30.91
HIGHEST INVERT = 30.95 CAPACITY = 783 ft^3/hr
MANNING'S'n' = 0.015 PERMIABILITY(K) = 5.40 ft/hr
DRAINAGE AREA = 0.8274 acres 36,040 ft^2 17-25 RETENTION = 1,502 ft^3
DEFAULTVALUES
31.70
34.50
0.28 0
2,756 L max
4.10 L min
2.00 WIDTH
1.00
L max L min L avg
'E' 'H' 'h' WATER 'V' MAX. MIN. AVG. i FILTER INCR. Q' T
LAKE TOTAL INCR. SURFACE INCR. FLOW FLOW FLOW HYD. AREA FLOW AVG. INCR.
ELEV. HEAD HEAD AREA VOLUME LENGTH LENGTH LENGTH GRAD. A=LxW Q=KiA FLOW TIME
(NGVD) ft ft ft^2 ft^3 ft ft ft i=H/Lavg ft^2 ft^3/hr ft^3/hr hours
34.50 3.34 2,756 4.10 2.00 3.05 1.10 43 255
0.28 733 244 3.01
34.22 3.06 2,480 4.10 2.00 3.05 1.00 43 233
0.28 656 223 2.95
33.94 2.78 2,205 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.91 43 212
0.28 579 201 2.88
33.66 2.50 1,929 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.82 43 191
0.28 502 180 2.79
33.38 2.22 1,654 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.73 43 169
0.28 424 159 2.68
33.10 1.94 1,378 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.64 43 148
0.28 347 137 2.53
32.82 1.66 1,102 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.55 43 127
0.28 270 116 2.33
32.54 1.38 827 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.45 43 105
0.28 193 95 2.04
32.26 1.10 551 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.36 43 84
0.28 116 73 1.58
31.98 0.82 276 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.27 43 63
0.28 39 52 0.74
31.70 0.54 (0) 4.10 2.00 3.05 0.18 43 41
REQUIRED 1/2"TREATMENT VOLUME (ft^3)= 1,502
PROVIDED TREATMENT VOLUME (ft^3) = 3,858 RECEIVED TOTAL TIME (hrs) = 23.51
NOY 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
UNDERDRN-POND 1 43LF.xls
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Jul 0 1 05 10:03a Hupp IF 1 ty Adv i s-ors 813 251962 P-1
FAX COVER SHEET
HUPP REALTY ADVISORS, INC.
907 S. Ft. Harrison Ave., Suite 102
Clearwater, FL 33756
www.hupprealty. com
Phone: (727) 210-1900
Fax. (727) 210-1901
SEND TO.
Scots= Lincoln
FROM.
Rosalie McGinnis
Company. LA Civil Eng Date: 711105
Office Number CC:
Fax Number. 446-9050 RE- Magnolia Park Realty-proof of ownership
- Urgent _ Reply ASAP _ please Comment _ Please Review -x-For Your Information
Total pages, including cover. 7
COMMENTS:
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 08 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OFCLEARWATER
Jul 01 05 10:03a
f..
wo-]
5/93
Hupp Realty R?sons
This i' - rrant. 4Teed
813 25
Made this ?qdj A day of July AD. 2002
by BENMARK PARTNERS$IP,a Florida general
partnership
hereinafter called the grantor, to
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY, LLC
1 6962
po
t'i
,
,j iii-k?i?F.?r??.. ??; _ •: ,
rsj';fi ; =f; ;r
607t office address
whose
is;
77 PEST BAY STREET
TAMPA, FL 33606 #
Grantees, Tax Id # P NE el_AS CO RUG- 1-200e 1PG 1314
hereinafter called the grantee: IMENION®®5no
(Wheaevcr used hertia the teffi "grantor' aad 'gran(ee' include atl the parti« to ibis iastrumeat and the
heir, Jegal repteaatatioee and asagaa of kK* ndnals, and the sucoe$oa and arcigos or corpondow)
Wltnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum cf S 10.00
and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises,
releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate m Pinellas
County, Florida, viz
The North 25.5 feet of Lot (5), less the East 31 feet of the
South 16.5 feet thereof, all of Lot Four (4), all of Lot Six
- (6), less the South 45 feet thereof, and the West 1/2 of Lot
Seven (7), Block 33, MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the
plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, page 43 of the Public
Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
SUBJECT TO covenants, restrictions, easements of record and taxes for
-- the current year.
Parcel Identification Number: 15/29/15/54450/033/0040
l Togetherwith all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining.
To Have and to Hold, the same in fee simple forever.
And the grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land In fee simple;
that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sa and convey said land; that the grantor hereby fully warrants
the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of A persons whomsoever; and that said land is
free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2001
written_ In Witness Whemf, the said grantor has signed and seal c presents the day and year first above
Signed sealed and delivered in our presence: B P P, a Florida general
J i J'-, artner?
e BY: !/ is
nc Y>,n .7}x..Ji, nr) MARK S. KLEIN, general partner
l N
if --???c JY`f' • - c?a,i 11.E 1
State of Florida
County of Pinellas
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of July 2002, by
MARK S. KLEIN, general partner of BENKARK PARTNERSHIP, a Florida gernal'partnership
who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification.
i
-ssr teodeAtrtao6ottdt ,i
?Publice:
?
PREPARED BY: DAVID E. PLATTE My Commisnon
RECORD & RETURN TO:
Law Offices Of David E. Platte
603 Indian Rocks Road
Belleair, Florida 33756 File No:02-6397
ORIGINAL
RECEWED
I`ii IV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Jul 01 05 10:03a
Hupp Realty Advisors
?Orpor. Warr-WRY I)eed
t- a
6/99
Thislndentnre, made this 29th day of July
A.D. 2002 , Between
MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC.
formerly known as Morton F. Plant Hospital Assoeia
Inc., a Non-Profit Florida Corporation
whose post office address is: P. O. Box 210
Clearwater, FL 33757
a corporation existing under the laws of the
State of Florida , Grantor and
Magnolia Park Realty, LLC , a Florida
limited liability company
whose post office address is: 607 West Bay Street
Tampa, PL 33606
Grantees' Tax Id #
-Grantee,
813 251 6962 p
' .ryvr t:
°.'°.q??9?;••,f'h Wit. - ry.i ?,.... j?:ry.
(•t r'.
02-286180 RUG- 1-2002 2:1
PINELLAS CO 8K 12138 PG 152-2
INNOMEaNIN®IN
Witnesseth, that the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of ( Tea & No/100 )
-Dollars, to it in baud paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and
sold to the said Grantee forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of
Pinellas State of Florida, to wit
The East 1/2 of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8, Block 33, MAGNOLIA PARK
'SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book
3, page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Subject to covenants, restrictions and easements of record. Subject
also to taxes for 2000 and suasegttent years.
Parcel Identification Number: 15/29/15/54450/033/0080
And the said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful
claims of all persons whomsoever.
In Witness Whereof, the said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed m its name by its duly
authorized officer and caused its corporate seal to be affiSed the ay and year first above written.
Signed and- Sealed ing Our Presence: BT
.. • ?;? ?l?r'? 4t Phil. Beau
Y champ
?i^':? _ .Presrldent
. ?. _ Y (Corporate Seal)
svvnca rdacda:c_ E!7.11
State of
County of Florida
Pinellas
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1 by
of Philip K. Beauchamp 29th July 2002
MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC.
a corporation casting under the laws of the State of on behalf of the corporation.
He/She is personally known to me or has produced Florida _ as identification
PREPARED BY: David E. P
RECORD & RETURN TO:
Law Offices Of David E.
603 Indian Rocks Road
Belleair, Florida 33756
i
?•f?•- s
a 4:I..i•?ri.,?_='--K: y?l ?rafll. ?.
atte Notary public- ;
Pciet NamC r'b -•r. f? a., .?
My C-n
ga*
Plat;
MY
C?4O?OSH E7?IR?
S-Z
pO"s01W.VT"FMWRRWC? W-File No:02-6397A
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
-h/ n 6 2005
OLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Jul 01 05 10:03a Hupp Realty Advisors 813 251 6962 p
02-2SS 196 AUG- 1-2002 2 : i°_ FIIELLAS ta? d ?t? ii l N
P INELLAS CO 8K 12138 PG 153e
- ----•--.-.-- .-. _. .....•_
A1920 T-61-XV2
PREPARED BY AND vt i E9? L? .R
-n'
TO BE RETURNED TO: f M3b
DAVID-E. PLATTE, ESQ. "-.022 '•M ?"2"[I
603 Indian Rocks Road 6 M1 NO
Belleair, F1 33756
Grantee SS# -- --
QUIT. CLAIM DEED
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BENMARK PARTNERSHIP, a
Florida general partnership, party of the first part, for and in
consideration of the sum of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS, lawful money of
the United states, to it paid by MAGNOLOA PARK REALTY, LLC, a
Florida limited liability company, whose mailing is 607 West Bay
Street, Tampa, FL 33606, party of the second part, the receipt
whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold,
transferred and delivered, and by these presents does grant,
bargain, sell, transfer and deliver unto the said party of the
second part, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, in
all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said
party of the first part has in and to the following described
property:
Easement dated July 1, 1976, recorded in O. R. Book 4519, page
- -- 957, public records of Pinellas County, Florida.
;- --- SUBJECT TO covenants, restrictions, easements of record and
taxes for the year 2002 and subsequent years.
-.------ ---- PARCEL NO. 15/29/15/54440/033/0040
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular
f-,Jj>-the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining,
all the estate, right, title, interest and aim whatsoever of
the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, to the
only proper use, benefit and behalf of the said party of the second
part, which property is being conveyed without any warranties of
title or otherwise.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first rt has cause
their hands and seals to be hereunto affixed this day of July,
2002.
Signed, Sealed and Delivered
in the presence of
l1
1st Witness:
Print Name:
2nd Wits e
Print Na e :
"fI
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
BENMAQ2K PA IP, a Florida
geeral
?'' /d 4 „JE' fps
MARK S. KLEIN, general partner
ORIGINAL
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ? ?1-
day of July, 2002, by MARK S. KLEIN, general partner of BENMARK
PARTNERSHIP ( ) who is personal -- or ( ) who has
produced as identification.
(SEAL) Notary P 1 c W M
y Commi s•on Expires: 0 ECE E D
My Commission NQ.: D
NOV O 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Jul 0 1 05 10:04a Hupp a 1 ty Advisors 813 25162 P-5
Policy of Title Ynsurance
Schedule A
Order Number: 411333000A
Amount of Insurance: $250,000.00
Policy Number: A02-0082086
Reference Number: 02-6397
Date of Policy: The date shown below or the date of recording of the instruments referred to in Item 3,
whichever is the later.
August 1, 2002 at 2:47 P.M.
1. Name of Insured
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is:
Fee Simple
3. Title to the estate or Interest in the land is vested in:
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, by virtue of Corporate
Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book 12138, page 1522 and Warranty Deed recorded in
Official Records Book 12138, page 1514, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
(See attached Exhibit A for legal description)
DPlatte, Attorney at Law
Indian ocks oad
Belleair, FL 34616
Authorized Officer
This policy is invalid unless a cover sheet and Schedule 8 are attached.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Policy A02-0082086 [ALTA Owner's Policy G0/I7/1992)]
Pagel of 3
Jul 01 05 10:04a Hupp *lty Advisors 813 251&G2 p.G
Exhibit A
PARCEL 1 (FEE SIMPLE)
Policy Number. A02-0082086
The East 1/2 of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8, Block 33, MAGNOLIA PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof
recorded in Plat Book 3, page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida.
PARCEL 2:
The North 25.5 feet of Lot Five (5), Less the East 31 feet of the South 16.5 feet thereof, all of Lot Four (4), all
of Lot Six (6), Less the South 45 feet thereof, and the West 1/2 of Lot Seven (7), Block 33, MAGNOLIA PARK
SUBDIVISION, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, page 43 of the Public Records of Pinellas
County, Florida.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Policy A02-0082086 [ALTA Owner's policy (I0/I7/,992)]
Page 2 of 3
Jul 01 05 10:04a Hupp *lty Advisors
Schedule B
813 25162 P.?
Policy Number: A02-0082086
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes and assessments for the year 2002 and subsequent years.
2. Rights of tenants(s) in possession, if any, under leases not recorded in the Public Records.
3. Mortgage from Magnolia Park Realty, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, to First National Bank of
Florida, dated July 29, 2002 and recorded August 1, 2002 in Officif Records Book 12138, page 1564,
Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, in the original principal amount of $200,000.00.
4. Assignment of Rents securing First National Bank of Florida, dated July 29, 2002 and recorded August
1, 2002 in Official Records Book 12138, page 1660.
5. UCC Financing Statement securing First National Bank of Florida recorded August 1, 2002 in Official
Records Book 12138, page 2078.
NOTE: All recording references in this commitment/policy shall refer to the Public Records of Pinellas County,
Florida, unless otherwise noted.
NO
may Present inquiries, obtain information about cover-age, or TE: In accordance with Florida Statutes section 627.4131, please be advised that the insured hereunder
contacting the Regional Office, 201 outh Orange Avenue, Suite receive 1350, Orlando, FL 32801 Te pholne 407-481-
8181.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Nov 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Policy A02-0082086 [ALTA Owner's Policy (10/17/1992)]
Page 3 of 3
Jul 0 1 05 1-1:20a Hupp 0l ty Advisors 813 25162 P.1
FAX COVER SHEET
HUPP REALTY ADVISORS, INC.
907 S_ Ft_ Harrison Ave., Suite 102
Clearwater, FL 33756
www.huppreafty.com
Phone: (727) 210-1900
Fax: (727) 210-1901
SEND T O:
Scott Lincoln FROM.
Rosalie McGinnis
Company.. LA Civil Eng Date: 7/1/05
Office Number. CC:
Fax Number. 446-9050 RE. Magnolia Park Realty-proof of ownership
_ Urgent _ Reply ASAP _ Please Comment _ Please Review -x-For Your Information
Total pages, including cover. 7
COMMENTS:
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Jul 01 05 11:20a Hupp Realty fl*ors
Corporate Warranty Deed
This Indenture, made, February 6, 2004 A.D.
Between
Joy Rockwell Enterprises, Inc, a Florida corporation whose post office address
is: 404 South Martin Luther King Avenue, Clearwater, FL 33756 a corporation
existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Grantor and B.K.B. Properties,
Inc, a Florida corporation whose post office address is: 800 Island Flay,
Clearwater, FL 33767, Grantee,
813 251 6962 pe
KARLMN F, pE
WSNTI
LAS COtr ? OF COURT
?T e t3 Is 02ho
Bi
? ft rzw at 0935 AM
0 DOC STAMP. SZRR 0.00 $10;0
Witnesseth, that the said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/10o Dollars (5:10.00 ), to it in hand
paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee forever, the
following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of, State of Florida, to wit:
SEE EJDDBIT "A" ATTACKED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
Subject to taxes for the current year and all subsequent years, covenants, restrictions and easements of record, if any.
Parcel Identification Number. 16/29/15/00009/44010120
And the said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all
persons whomsoever.
In Wiliness Whereof, the said Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed in its name by its duly authorized officer
and caused its corporate seal to be af5xed the day and year fast above written.
Joy Rockwell E61erprises, Inca Florida corporation
By.
/!oyWRockv
iI
,It / Itst4resident
(Corporate Seal)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 6th day of February, 2004, by Joy H. Rockwell, the President of Joy Rockwell
Enterprises, Inc., a Florida Corp,[i -ion , a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida, on behalf of the corporation, who
produced ! - - b/ C. as identification.
-? (seal)
Notary Public,
Notary Printed N
MY Commission Expires::
Prepared by:
David E. Platte, Esquire
Law Offices of David E. Platte,
603 Indian Rocks Road
Belleau, Florida 33756
File Number: 03-6693
; a. 4.L
?mna ? to
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
Closers Choice Fonda Corporate Dood/Lcmr
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
State of Florida
County of Pinellas
Jul 01 05 11:20a Hupp Realty *sors 813 251 6962 pie
Exhibit "A"
The Southerly half of that certain parcel of land formerly Seaboard Coastline Railroad Company's right of way
lying between Blocks 32 and 33. MAGNOLIA PARK as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 43, Public Records of
Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southwest comer of Lot 24, said Block 32; running thence South 89°52'00" West along the
Northerly right of way of Magnolia Street (identified as Magnolia Drive per Pinellas County Property Ownership
Map dated July 24, 1990 and identified as Allen Ave. per Plat Book 3, page 43), 64.56 feet to the Southeast
comer of Lot 8, said Block 33; thence North 01 °42'58" West along the East line of same, 135.05 feet to the
Northeast corner of said Lot 8; thence North 89°52'03" East, 61.15 feet to the Northwest comer of said Lot 24;
thence South 03°09'39" East along the West line of same, 135.19 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 08 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OFCLEpRWATER
Jul 01 05 11:21a Hupp 01-ty Advisors 813 251 .62 p.4
Policy of Title Insurance
Commonwealth Land Title4nsurance Company
Schedule A
Order Number: 41193014CA
Policy Number. A02-0189694
Reference dumber: 03-6693
Amount of Insurance: $40,000.00
Date of Policy: The date shown below or the date of recording of the instruments referred to in Item 3, whichever is the later.
FEBRUARY 10, 2004 AT 9:35 A.M.
1. Name of Insured
B.K.B. PROPERTIES, INC., a Florida corporation
2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is:
Fee Simple
3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in.
B_K_B. PROPERTIES, INC.. A Florida Corporation, by virtue of Corporate Warranty Deed recorded in Official Records Book
13366, Page 1, of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida
4. The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
(See attached Exhibit A for legal description)
David E,.Platie, At grfeyofl~aw
t. n
U?
603 Indian Rocks Road
Belicair, FL 34616
This policy is invalid unless a cover sheet and Schedule B are attached.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Policy A02-0189694 [ALTA Owner's Policy (10/17/1992)] Page I of
Jul 01 05 11:21a Hupp l1alt-ti Advi-sors 813 251 962 p.5
Schedule 8
-Policy Number: A02-0189694
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by
reason of
1. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the Public Records, boundary tine disputes, overlaps, encroachments, and
any matters not of record which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises.
2. Taxes and assessments for the year 2004 and subsequent years.
3. Rights of adjoining owners in and to the unobstructed flow of the ditch running along the West lot line of caption premises.
NOTE: All recording references in this commitmentJpolicy shall refer to the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, unless otherwise
noted.
NOTE: In accordance with Florida Statutes section 627.4131. please be advised that the insured hereunder may present inquiries,
obtain information about coverage, or receive assistance in resolving complaints, by contacting the Commonwealth Land Title
Insurance Company Regional Office, 201 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1350. Orlando, FL 32801 Telephone 407-481-8181.
OR IGINAL
RE^rlVED
NOV 08 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OFCIEARWATER
Policy A02-0189694 [ALTA Owner's Policy (10/17/1992)] Page 3 of 3
Jul 01 05 11.:21a Hupp *ty Advisors 813 251 IW2 P.6
Exhibit A
Policy Number: A02-0189694-
The Southerly half of that certain parcel of land formerly seaboard Coastline Railroad Company's right of way lying between Blocks 32
and 33, MAGNOLIA PARK as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of Lot 24, said Block 32; running thence South 89°52'00" West along the Northerly right of way of
Magnolia Street (identified as Magnolia Drive per Pinellas County Property Ownership Map dated July 24, 1990 and identified as Allen
Ave. per Plat Book 3, page 43), 64.56 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 8, said Block 33; thence North 01 °42'58" West along the East
tine of same, 135.05 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 8; thence North 89°52'03" East, 61.15 feet to the Northwest corner of said
Lot 24; thence South 03°09'39" East along the West line of same, 135.19 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 08 2005
PLANNINGDEPgRMENT
CITY OFCtEARWgTER
Policy A02-0189694 [ALTA Owner's Policy (10/17/1992)] Page 2 of 3
Pinellas County Property Apprai*nformation: 16 29 15 36270 000 1670 Page 2 of 5
15 / 29 / 15 / 54450 / 033 / 0040
14-Jun-2004 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:46:02
Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY OBK: 12138 OPG: 1514
607 W BAY ST
TAMPA FL 33606-2703
ORIGIN,
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 907 S FT HARRISON AUE
of Jan 1, 2003, based on Census Tract: 259.02
sales from 2001 - 2002:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 8 /2,002 12,138/1,514 100,000 (U) I
1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- 8 12,000 11,016/2,276 50,000 (U) I
1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- 1 /1,992 7,797/1,246 18,700 (U) I
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 ( )
2003 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 185,000 Homestead: 0 Ownership % .000
Historic 0 Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 185,000 Tax Exempt %: .000
Other Exempt: 0
Taxable: 185,000 Agricultural: 0
2003 Tax Information Updates for 2004 Land Information in progress.
2004 Changes not reflected in 2003 Values.
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
03 Millage: 23.0851 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
03 Taxes: 4,270.74
1) 80 x 215 10. 00 8,954. 00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 6.50 9,142.00 S
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2003 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
4,270.74 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
Without any exemptions,
2003 taxes will be
4,270.74
Short Legal MAGNOLIA PARK BLK 33, (LEASE SEPT 2061
Description OR BK 5482 PG 1499) LOT 4 & N 25.5FT OF W 104FT OF
4L
Building Information 08 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF GIEARWATER
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=16+29+15+36270+000+1670241%2... 6/14/2004
Pinellas County Property Apprai*nformation: 16 29 15 36270 000 1670
Page 3 of 5
15 / 29 / 15 / 54450 / 033 / 0040 :01
14-Jun-2004 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11.46:02
Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Offices .
Property Address: 907 S FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 330 Land Use: 17
Structural E1?ments
Foundation Continuous Footing
Floor System Slab on Grade
Exterior Wall Concrete Block
Height Factor 0
Party Wall None
Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel
Roof Frame Flat
Roof Cover Built Up/Composition
Cabinet & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Drywall
Total Units 0
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 12
Bath Tile None
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 11950
Effective Age 55
Other Depreciation 25
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sub Areas
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 6,424 7) .00 0
2) Canopy .25 60 8) .00 0
3) .00 0 9) .00 0
4) .00 0 10) .00 0
5) .00 0 11) .00 0
6) 00 0 12) .00 0
C omm e r c i a1 E x t r a F e at ur 5
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 8000SF 1.50 8,000 0 121000 999
2) 00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) 00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 12,000
Map ORIGINAL
oF o o??
RECEIVED
Nov 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?plus=l &p=16+29+15+36270+000+1670241 %2... 6/14/2004
Pinellas County Property Apprai*nformation: 16 29 15 36270 000 1670
90 70 IOC 85
m
10 6 4 2
41 7 35 33
, o
m
ly
III 90 135
0
`'
42 4 38 34
1
135
75 7 71 Ln u'
Eq 67
rn o
- w a
7 175 m
Page 4 of 5
PHASE I
PHA
? f
PH.A?
PHASE V
120 IOC7 8?J m 135 50 (46.
SO6
:
o .
7 4 72 70 68
10 9
2 3 4 5
Lr)
3
155.7
135 205.7
ftl 1 9 IC ? Ic s t03 4
M 4 S 7 8 u, 0
22 21 20 19
18
r 70 n - co
34 is
10
TIC 307(5) a 63 m? 410(5)
143
142
Sd 13515] 50 IIBfS]
- !u co
135
- - -
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
http://pao.co.pinellas. fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?plus=l &p=16+29+15+36270+000+1670241 %2... 6/14/2004
Pinellas Uounty Property Apprais Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0040 Page 2 of 4
15 / 29 l 15 f 54450 f 033 / 0080
24-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property-Appraiser 10:23:05
Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY OBK: 12138 OPG: 1522
607 V BAY ST
TAMPA FL 33606-2703
EVAC: Non-EVAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 259.02
sales from 2002 - 2003:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 8 /2,002 12,138/1,522 150,000 (U) U
1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- 1 /1,981 5,134/1,226 130,000 (0) I
1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- 0 /1,976 4,42911,702 96,600 (Q) U
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,971 3,645/ 339 3,000 (0) I
2004 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 53,008 Homestead: NO Ownership .000
Govt Exem: NO Use 2: .000
Assessed/Cap: 53,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt 2: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 53,000 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information 16
District: CU Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater view:
04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes: 1,217.38
1) 71 x 135 7.00 91585.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 8 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1,217.38 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exemptions,
2004 taxes will be
1,217.38
Short Legal MAGNOLIA PARK BLK 33, E 1/2 OF LOT 7
Description AND LOT 8 R E
UL
IVED
_ . .... _. _ .. _ .. .. ..._ ...._ ... _... _ __. _ _. -. _ _.._ ??j+'?. ? ?. 2005
Building Information PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c= l &r=0.2&s=1 &u=0&p=15+... 7/24/2005
Pinellas County Property AppraisInforrnation: 15 29 15 54450 033 0040
15 1 29 / 15 I 54450 033 I 0080
Page 3 of 4
24-]u1-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:23:06
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10
Vzucan-t Extra F+aa-tures
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4} .00 0 0 0 0
5} .00 0 0 0 0
6} .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map
14w] nvk* T
1*1 ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
Nov 0 8 205
AMT
gLMNING WAWER
C1TY OF CLEAR
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &u=0&p=15+... 7/24/2005
Pinellas County Property Appraiser ln
formation: 15 29 15 54450 033 0040 Page 4 of 4
0
100 85 'r 135 F- 0?4 SO- 4G3.2
0 544SD
M
4 2 kn 2 0?'0 I 10 9 2 a PHASE I PH
- o
U 3 28 23 ?29
7 35 33 id 17 1B Is za PHASE VITA
e 14 15 Is 2s 24 23
00
i 26 - _
r?r) B -, 13
102. 78 F 41 7 ? 12 22 <27 I- _,
a 6 2e w 22620
I 1 SMINE 1 WA* Q
?? II ?f S 97C5) _
90 135 ??? 4 3 4, 40 Y 29 a.
2 36 v
a 4 0
43 31
36 34 44 3e 32 PHASE V11B
5 36 1 33
13.5 v 1 35 34
LP o 3 r 75
66 61.1 4s PH
71 '? ' 43 ? 135 4 ?6 ? g a 2432 °w 69 670 A o el ^? f M 23 PHASE V Ui Lb
7
?LL 51 175 pg,g I v 71.2 h 5 50 275_13 61.3
s0 148- 506
.E
150 80 F
Q `) 54450
72 70 68 If0 9 2 r55.7
U-i ru X05.7 W-,c"
17 15 x030 6 7 8 21 20 19 17 r6 IS
70 34 C? 1W
,3 1I 10
9 log 10 s
-'.'0 R I I N A L
Pinellas County Property Appraiser RECEIVEI)
Parcel Information
1?i)V 0.8..2005--
°1-ANNING f)EpARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &u=0&p=15+... 7/24/2005
Pinellas County Property Appraisorrrnation: 15 29 15 54450 033 00800 Page 2 of 4
16 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 440 / 0120
24-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 10:23:37
Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales
B K B PROPERTIES INC OBK: 13366 OPG: 0001
800 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33767-1825
EVAC: Non-EVAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0 (?
of Jan 1, 2004, based on
Census Tract: 259.02
0 R ?_
sales from 2002 - 2003:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 2 /2,004 13,366/ 1 40,000 (Q) U
0000: Book Pgs - 9 /2,000 11,036/1,252 278,000 (H) U
0000: Book Pgs - 8 /1,990 7,343/2,096 250,000 (H) U
0000: Book Pgs - 10/1,987 6,5931 581 190,000 (H) U
2004 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 46,900 Homestead: NO Ownership % .800
Govt Exem: NO Use %: ,000
Assessed/Cap: 46,900 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 46,900 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size U nit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes: 1,077.26
1) 64 x 135 7.00 8,484.00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .80
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .80 .00
cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1,077.26 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without any exemptions,
2004 taxes will be
1,077.26
Short Legal FORMER RR R/W
Description BLK 33 OF M LYING W OF LOT 24 BLK 32 & E OF LOT 8
REC
AGN OLIA PARK SUB O
INAL
E F
IVED
... _.... ? ...... _ ...... _.. _. _.... _ ..._.. _._ ... _ti().Y .0 .8 2005
Building Information PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &u=0&p=15+... 7/24/2005
Pinellas County Property Appraiseiormation: 15 29 15 54450 033 0080 0
16 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 440 / 0120
Page 3 of 4
24-3ul-ZOOS Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 10.23.37
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10 .
Vacanv ExTra F40aTurqBa
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2} .00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map
At] n+ FQ'-7'
RKI R F
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATEP
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1&a=1&b=1&c=1&r 0.2&s=1&u=0&p=15+... 7/24/2005
Pinellas County Property Apprai#nformation: 15 29 15 54450 033 00809
Page 4 of 4
4 63 L'
PHASE VIIA
?22620
1s.c
z
V
u
c
n
as do (35 so i9a, sa?_$
w ?S44500
770 88 2 m II IQ 9 L
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
4 155.7
3
? --- -
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=0.2&s=1 &u=0&p=15+... 7/24/2005
A
Ia.
ORIGINAL O
FLD2005-07074
907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Date Received: 07/28/2005
MAGNOLIA PK OFFICE & TOWNHOMES
ZONING DISTRICT: C DECEIVED
LAND USE: CG
Nnv o)4 ?DOS
pLgNNING DEPARTA?ERT
ATLAS PAGE: 295B C11YOFMAN
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
CLW CoverSheet
?pte, 7/28/2005
S
•'I` Receipt #: 1200500000000007173 2:19:03PM
?= -
r ORIGINAL.
Date: 07/28/2005
Line Items:
Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid
FLD2005-07074 04 Flexible Commercial 010-341262 1,205.00
Line Item Total: $1,205.00
Payments:
40
0
Method Payer
Initials Check No Confirm No How Received
Check HB SEMINOLE
jaw 5363
In Person
Payment Total:
. ?j
JUL Z 6 ?
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
Amount Paid
1,205.00
$1,205.00
cReceipt.rpt
Page 1 of 1.
ORIGINAL 3
FLD2005-07074
907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Date Received: 07/28/2005
MAGNOLIA PK OFFICE & TOWNHOMES
ZONING DISTRICT: C
LAND USE: CG ?
S ATLAS PAGE: 295B
PLANNER OF RECORD: WW
SEP s Q 20M
CLWCoverSheet
0
JUL 2 8 2005
G&
DEVEIt?t
0
3Pic
FLD2005-07074
907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Date Received: 07/28/2005
MAGNOLIA PARK
ZONING DISTRICT: C
LAND USE: CG
ATLAS PAGE: 295B
PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED
F'
CLWCoverSheet
0 .0
Wells, Wayne
From: Andrew Hupp. [andrew@hupprealty.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 3:38 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Scott Lincoln
Subject: BCP2008-09188 Unity of Title
IM
KM31302776.p
df
Wayne, attached is the unity of title which has been,recorded. I will have
the detail for the dumpster added to the site plan and submit later this
week. Andrew
1
KEN BURKE, CLERK OF COURT
`,`lt{'' PLANNING DEPARTMENT NST# 009002 6101062009 at 01:22 PM
c 100 S. MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR OFF REC BK: 16464 PG: 1561-1562
9'°?ywr CLEARWATER, FL 33756 DmType:NOTICE RECORDING: $18.50
PHONE: 727-562-4567; FAX: 727-562-4865
DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE
Property Owner:
Property Address: Q'7 5 . C Spn ?ltoC?y za l-- /Z
KNOW OF ALI, MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that pursuant to -the ordinances of the City of Clearwater
pertaining to the issuance of building permits and regulating land development activities, the undersigned, being
the fee owner (s) of the following described real property (legal description) situated in the City of Clearwater,
County of Pinellas and State of Florida, to wit:
do hereby make the following declaration of conditions, limitations and restrictions on said lands, hereafter to be
known and referred to as a DECLARATION OF UNITY OF TITLE, as to the following particulars:
1. That the aforesaid plot or combination of separate lots, plots, parcels, acreage or portions thereof, shall
hereafter be regarded as and is hereby declared to be unified under one title as an indivisible building
site.
2. That the said property shall henceforth be considered as one plot or parcel of land, and that no portion
thereof shall be sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or devised separately except in its entirety, as one
plot or parcel of land.
3. That this Declaration of Unity of Title shall constitute a covenant to run with, the land, as provided by
law, and shall be binding upon the undersigned, and the heirs, successors and assigns of the undersigned,
and all parties claiming under them until such time as the saute may be released in writing under the
order of the City Manager of the City of Clearwater. The undersigned also agree(s) that this instrument
shall be recorded in the public records of Pinellas County, Florida.
Signed, sealed, witnessed and acknowledged this day of 200
at Clearwater, Florida.
Wi S OWNER (S):
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PiNELLAS The lore going instrument was acknowledged before me this _???ry - day of
1 S1 20??, by rrir dic
e41) . 5Cv.?
on behalf of whom the instrument was executed.
Notary Public State of Florida
aQ' ? Rosalie G McG r- s Notary Public Signature
_. d A4y Commissar UD661579
''tor fl°° Ex ires 0511612011 ASCI /e_,? ?S Natne of Notarv Printed
Notary Commission Number:
(SEAL ABOVE) Personally known or produced identification
Type of identification produced
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Local SettingATemporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\77CRMJOQ\Unity of Title Declaration 2006.doc
EXHIBIT "A'
Parcel No. 16/29/15/00000/440/0120
Legal Description:
The Southerly half of that certain parcel of land formerly Seaboard Coastline Railroad
Company's right of way lying between Blocks 32 and 33, Magnolia Park as recorded in
Plat Book 3, page 43, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, being more
particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of Lot 24, said Block 32; running thence south
89°52'00" west along the northerly right of way of Magnolia Street (identified as
Magnolia Drive per Pinellas County Property Ownership Map dated July 24, 1990 and
identified as Allen Ave. per Plat Book 3, page 43), 64.56 feet to the southeast corner of
Lot 8, said Block 33; thence north 01 042'58" west along the east line of same, 135.05
feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 8; thence north 89°52'03" east, 61.15 feet to the
northwest corner of said Lot 24; thence south 03°09'39" east along the west line of
same, 135.19 feet to the point of beginning.
AND
Parcel No. 15/29/15/54450/033/0040
Legal Description:
The north 25.5 feet of Lot 5, less the east 31 feet of the south 16.5 feet thereof, all of
Lot 4, all of Lot 6, less the south 45 feet thereof, and the west '/z of Lot 7, Block 33,
Magnolia Park Subdivision, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, Page
43, of the public records of Pinellas County, Florida.
AND
Parcel No. 15/29/15/54450/033/0080
Legal Description:
The east 'h of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8, Block 33, Magnolia Park Subdivision, according to
the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 43, of the public records of Pinellas
County, Florida.
•
711035718
A G R 1 '- T
o?T?s
6
THIS nGRL'E`2NT entered into this 1st day of July,
1976 by and between LeF::BVRi; L GPUNY, LTD., a Florida Linated
Partnership, hereinafter referred to as LeIZBVRE t GRAY,
a,rd MICHAEL S. HARRIS, hereinafter referred as HARRIS.
W I T H S S E T I;
W7H1.ZE S, LeFEBVRE A. GRAY has this day sold, assigned
and delivered to HA.RRIS the following described property,
hereinafter collectively referred to as PROPERTY:
Leasehold interest to:
The North 25.5 feet of Lot 5, Less the East 31 feet
of the South 16.5 feet thereof, all of Lot 4, all of
Lot 6, Less the South 45 feet thereof, and all of the
Hest 1/2 of Lot 7, all being in Block 33, MAGNOLIA
PARK SUBDIVISION, according to the map or plat
''ereOf as recorded in Plat Bode 3, Page 43, of the
1-•ihlic Records of Pinellas County, rlorida.
Fee ai`ale interest to:
i The East 1/2 of Lot 7 and all of Lot 8, Block 33,
t1Ar,;ILIA PARK SUBDIVISION, according to map
or plat thereof as recorded ir. Plat Book 3, Page 43
of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, and
WHERE.kS, there presently exists a driveway on PROPERTT
which is situate between two buildings co®sonly described
as 905 Eouth Fort Harrison and 907 South Fort Harrison, hereinafter
collectively referred to as BUILDINGS, is presently being
r used. by the tenants of each BUILDING, and
3 the PROPEPT[-which is presentl Deinq aced as eom,ron parkingfl•1.si!;
_?? ar_-7 17!dr, and
.tmEREAS, the parties hereto intend to keep the
driveway' and available for the axe of the
S tenants, employees, invitees, and licensees of and for each
BUILDING.
,._ ;:OW THEREFORE. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED. that:
Y ti
x 1. LeFEBVRE L GRAY hereby grants to HARRIS, his
`3?mployees, tenants, licensees and invitees the right to use
-the said driveway now existing between the BUILDINGS for tt.e
'Turpose of ingress and egress of the tenants, rtsployees. ?.'
invitees and licensees of HARRIS in order to use the parking %? t 4
t" elreas now existing on the above described PROPERT¢. bet'ne
COW- M.N•+ }' 4kU
P&m*m--fte- 1404
2.
employees, tenants. licensees and invitees us?
the p+rrkinq areas presently located +tlra?mve described
L property for the purpose of g L1_FEBVRE i CRAY, its tenant,
employees,invitees censees the use of said parking
areas and f e purpose of ingress and egress to Magnolia
Stre South Port Harrison.Avenue. H:.RRIS will maintain
..,t,
?trur
rcc 3. Each party agree; not to alter, ehangc or otArer+ise
u. codify the present condition of the driveway aw.:.-p+ai.trrg
,.... +a.+. so as to hinder, obstruct or otherwise restrict the
,.... provisions and intentions of paragraph 1 and 2 hereof without
the prior written consent of the affected party.
4. :)o modification or alteration of this .1grc•:ment
M-
f
1
pq ' 11 ' )
W, ((
J
t
.. 'mss
.y
:M
1
N K ;0 CU Co
?G)uno
.00O0?V
0r- Z 1V (n
Dm0
?m45 m
> O 00 --?
0 0 n D
-n K 00
?zC?
? M
0 cn
?i O
4# Z
c0 D
?
Cn
co <
m
w
U ?
W
>c
l f-w>
® lit CO CC
LS-. 0- 0 u 1
C?4 00U
WILu-?
'sa >00?
wm}
O 0
LU
J z
I/
;41
•
r•. t. 4519 r<<E 556 .
shall be binding upon the parties hereto unless mutually agr^td
upon the parties in writing.
5. The covenar-ts herein contrined shall bind,
and the benefits and advantages shall inure to, the respective
heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns
the parties hereto. Whenever used herein, the singular
number shall include the plural, the plural the *=ngular, and
the use of any gender shall include}ender
s have n .reunto -?
set their respective hands and seals the day and yeas :irst
i'
above written.
Signed, sealed and delivered
in the presence of: r
IvTLfJC?
Signed, sealed and delivered
in --he presence of:
STi,TE OF FLORIDA
( ^UNTi OF Piti° .'JLS
v
o I a Lo L/t
bC v c,
( Te- N t" ax
NO
(11P4 u1C U¢V _
before
The foregoing Acjreement was acknovle
-e this /sL day of July, 197 b JAHES R 1, as a General
Partner or LeFEBVRT. L GRAY. •
r..y commission Expires:
.7,W naKs*•n Co ao06• •• vyG
} STATE OF FLORIDA
Co1iNTY OF PINELLAS
The fc -egoiag Agreem t
197
of Jul
d as ackrlovl before we
L H? S.
i
y,
ay
this
MO
uD •
_
+'?''"•?•°''}Illy Commission L:xpires: ,
.-. a i. xN•rtru
at"T W. "milk
bOfD f•W QNt.I Ja 10".ry!)?3
a""• "O" ••• This instrument pre!.arcd 'r•- `
George .•.. Schriefer
5151 Park 6oulevarA
Pinellas Park, Florida 33565
•
:ti
.rt
.•y
..I
J.
C. _.
•
CITY'
OF CLEARWATER
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Andrew J. Hupp
Hupp Realty Advisors
635 Court Street, Suite 201
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Development Order - Minor Revision
FLD2005-07074 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Dear Mr. Hupp:
•
September 9, 2008
On December 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved with 11 conditions the
above referenced case, which was for (1) Flexible Development approval to permit a Mixed Use of
offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached dwellings in the Commercial and Office Districts with a
reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to
the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the
front (south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to 16.34
feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero
feet (to pavement), a reductinn to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet
(to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to seven feet
(to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a
reduction to the side (east) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the
side (east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to
pavement) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in the
Commercial District from 25 feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in
the Office District from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the
visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-
704.C and 2-10043, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line along South Ft.
Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south
property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 8.02
feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line in the Commercial and
Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the
east property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the
landscape buffer along the west property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to pavement)
and reductions to the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Office District from 10 feet to
7.3 feet (to building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a
Rw. I?
September 9, 2008
Hupp - Page 2
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat
approval for a 10-lot subdivision.
A Minor Revision proposal has been submitted to revise the approved site and building plans with the
following:
1. The two-story office building fronting S. Ft. Harrison Avenue has been revised to a one-story
office building. This reduced building retains the same setback from the west and south property
lines. This one-story building will be 4,056 square feet in floor area, rather than the 5,250 square-
foot, approved two-story building.
2. Due to the reduced building square footage, required parking for the offices is now 17 spaces.
There are 19 parking spaces being provided.
3. The one-story building will be approximately 20 feet in height from grade to the mid-point of the
pitched roof, whereas the two-story building was approximately 31 feet in height (to flat roof).
4. The north/south dimension of the office building has been reduced to 58 feet in width so that the
three-foot wide roof overhang will not encroach into the drive aisle/driveway on the north side.
5. Truck (fire and trash) turning movements are not impaired with this redesign of the parking lot.
6. The building design still employs a standing seam metal roof, windows with shutters, a stucco
and hardi-board exterior finish and brackets.
7. Exterior air condensers are located on a flat area of the roof on the east side of the building,
screened from view by parapet walls.
In accordance with Section 4406.A of the Code, the revisions proposed are deemed to be a Minor
Revision and are APPROVED. This Minor Revision must be shown on revised site plans, landscape
plans and building plans, with the following additional changes from the plans submitted August 21,
2008, and approved under this Minor Revision, as additional Conditions of Approval:
1. That site data on the civil site plans be revised to reflect this Minor Revision, including interior
landscape area and parking calculations;
2. That a handicap ramp be indicated on the accessible path to S. Ft. Harrison Avenue on the east
side of the building;
3. That the exterior building colors be similar to that originally approved by the CDB; and
4. That the building elevations on Sheets A-3 and A-4 include a height dimension from existing
grade to the midpoint of the pitched roof;
Approval of this Minor Revision does not change or modify any Conditions of Approval adopted by the
CDB or any time frames contained in the original Development Order dated February 22, 2007 (revised
from December 22, 2005).
Should you have any questions, feel free to contact Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III, at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, AICP
Planning Director
S:IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationslFt Harrison Ave S 0907 - Magnolia Park offices & Townhomes
(C + O) - ApprovedlFt Harrison S 0907 Minor Revisions Letter 9.9.08.doc
Wells, Wayne
From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:36 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Andrew Hupp; Cory Miller
Subject: RE: Magnolia Park FLD2005-07074 907 S. Fort Harrison Avenue
Wayne:
We will email the revised truck route and get you a copy today.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:24 AM
To: info@hupprealty.com
Cc: Scott Lincoln
Subject: Magnolia Park FLD2005-07074 907 S. Fort Harrison Avenue
Andrew Hupp -
I have had Bennett Elbo in our Traffic Engineering Department look at
the proposed plans in regard to truck turning movements through the
site. There is an issue with getting a fire truck through the site (see
comments below). Bennett has also consulted Jim Keller in the Fire
Department, who concurs with Bennett's comment. Please revise the plan
to provide the applicable truck design movement through the site and
resubmit one copy of the plan to me so that we can check the redesign.
As a note, I will be out of the office Wednesday through Friday this
week and will be here next week for only Monday through Wednesday. I
will be out of town Sept. 18 - 29, 2008.
Wayne
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elbo, Bennett
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:02 AM
> To: Wells, Wayne
> Cc: Patni, Himanshu; Keller, James
> Subject: Magnolia Park FLD2005-07074 907 S. Fort Harrison
Avenue
> The fire truck used on sheet (4C Fire Truck Route) is not long enough.
The Fire Department uses a truck that is 48 foot long, the applicant
shall use a WB-40 design vehicle. Show the path (left & right wheel and
vehicle overhang) through the site in a forward direction.
> Thanks
> Bennett Elbo
> City of Clearwater
> Traffic Operations Division
> Tel: (727)562-4775
> fax: (727)562-4755
1
9 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Elbo, Bennett
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:02 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Patni, Himanshu; Keller, James
Subject: Magnolia Park FLD2005-07074 907 S. Fort Harrison Avenue
The fire truck used on sheet (4C Fire Truck Route) is not long enough: The Fire Department uses a truck that is 48 foot
long, the applicant shall use a WB-40 design vehicle. Show the path (left & right wheel and vehicle overhang) through the
site in a forward direction.
Thanks
Bennett Elbo
City of Clearwater
Traffic Operations Division
Tel: (727)562-4775
fax: (727)562-4755
•
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:24 AM
To: 'info@hupprealty.com'
Cc: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: Magnolia Park FLD2005-07074 907 S. Fort Harrison Avenue
Andrew Hupp -
have had Bennett Elbo in our Traffic Engineering Department look at the proposed plans in regard to truck turning
movements through the site. There is an issue with getting a fire truck through the site (see comments below). Bennett
has also consulted Jim Keller in the Fire Department, who concurs with Bennett's comment. Please revise the plan to
provide the applicable truck design movement through the site and resubmit one copy of the plan to me so that we can
check the redesign. As a note, I will be out of the office Wednesday through Friday this week and will be here next week
for only Monday through Wednesday. I will be out of town Sept. 18 - 29, 2008.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Elbo, Bennett
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:02 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Patni, Himanshu; Keller, James
Subject: Magnolia Park FLD2005-07074 907 S. Fort Harrison Avenue
The fire truck used on sheet (4C Fire Truck Route) is not long enough. The Fire Department uses a truck that is 48 foot
long, the applicant shall use a WB-40 design vehicle. Show the path (left & right wheel and vehicle overhang) through the
site in a forward direction.
Thanks
Bennett Elbo
City of Clearwater
Traffic Operations Division
Tel: (727)562-4775
fax: (727)562-4755
0 0
HUPP REALTY ADVISORS
635 Court Street, Suite 201, Clearwater, FL 33756
Phone: (727) 210-1900 ? Fax: (727) 210-1901
www.hupprealty.com
:?o I 4?aj-
July 1, 2008
Mr. Wayne Wells
Planning Department
City of Clearwater
100 S. Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
RE: BCP# 2006-12232
907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Dear Mr. Wells:
????Zoos- 07077?-
ORIGINAL
RECENED
JUL 0 1 2008
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
We are submitting revised elevations and site plan on the above referenced project for
your consideration. This is a revision of a minor modification to the previously approved
FLD 2005-07074. Please review at your convenience and advise if there are any other
items that should be addressed.
Should you need any additional information, please contact me. Thank you for your
assistance in this project.
enc.
AJH:rgm
?-
t
Line Items:
Receipt #: 1200800000000005434
Date: 07/01/2008
7/1/2008
11:05:13AM
Tran Code Description
Revenue Account No
Amount Paid
•
0
FLD2005-07074 02 Minor Revision 001000000341262000 400.00
Line Item Total: $400.00
Payments:
Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid
Check MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY LLC MAF 1071
In Person
Payment Total:
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT.
This is a receipt for an application for a permit.
This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application.
1
Page 1 of I
400.00
$400.00
cReceipt.rpt
Lincoln Associates Civil Engineering Group, Inc.
December 6, 2006,
Wayne Wells, Senior Planner - J
City of Clearwater Planning Department 3CP z-..0 0 to • 1223 2. 3 w?.
100 S. Myrtle Ave. ?Z.. 1 J O b
Clearwater, FL 33756
W W
Re: RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS (FLD2005-07074)
Magnolia Park
907 South Fort Harrison Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
LA Civil Project No.: 081-006.200
Dear Mr. Wells:
On behalf of our client, Magnolia Park Realty, LLC, we are hereby requesting a one (1) year extension of the
expiration date of 12/20/06 for FLD2005-07074 to 12/20/07. Our client's architect is in the process of preparing
building plans for the project and LA civil has completed the Civil/Site Plans. However, we are concerned that
our submittal my not occur until after 12/20/06.
In addition, our client is electing to phase the project by construction the office and required infrastructure in
Phase 1 and the Townhomes and remaining infrastructure in Phase 2. We are therefore assuming that this
extension will nonetheless be required to allow for independent building plan & permit submittals up to
12/20/07.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the above referenced request or the proposed project phasing,
please give me a call or email me. We certainly cannot afford to let this project be interrupted by any missed
deadlines or misunderstanding on our part of the City's view of our proposed phasing.
Sincerely,
LA Civil
Scott Lin
President
CC: Andrew Hupp, Hupp Realty Advisors, LLC (email)
Guy Faber, AIA, FWH Architects (email)
Brett Lund, AIA, FWH Architects (email)
1446 Court Street - Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph: (727) 446-9000 - Fax: (727) 446-9050 - E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com
0 9
Wells, Wayne
From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:44 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Guy Faber; Brett Lund; Andrew Hupp
Subject: RE: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
M
Extension Request
FLD2005-0707...
Please see extension request attached.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:27 AM
To: Scott Lincoln
Subject: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
By letter dated October 25, 2006, we sent you a courtesy notice that the
approvals for the above referenced project were set to expire. The
existing office building has now been demolished. No application for
the site and/or building plans have been submitted to-date. Should no
application for building permit be submitted on or prior to December 20,
2006, this project's approval becomes null and void. Alternately,
should a time extension for a maximum of one year be desired, a letter
of request needs to be submitted to the Planning Department (see Section
4-407 for criteria for a time extension) prior to the expiration date.
Wayne
t ? ? p/r/yre
.W
04
'''' 41 T ER,`
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF C LEARWATE R
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
February 22, 2007Deeember22, 2005
Mr. Scott Lincoln, PE
LA Civil, Inc.
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
RE: Amended Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-0707409402/PLT2005-00027 - 907 S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue
Dear Mr. Lincoln:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On December 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests
for (1) Flexible Development request to permit a Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine
attached dwellings in the Commercial and Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in
the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the
Commercial District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the front (south) setback in the
Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to .16.34 feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to building),
reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to seven feet (to building),
from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side
(east) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side
(south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side
(west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback
in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and
from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in the Commercial
District from 25 feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office
District from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the visibility
triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C
and 2-1004.B, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line along South Ft.
Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south
property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement),
a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to
8.02 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line in the
Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the east property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one
foot (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Office
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
February 22, 2007Deeeff?ber 22, 2005
Lincoln - Page 2
District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to
4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-
1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision. The Community Development Board
(CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title or Final Plat be recorded in the public
records;
3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground,
including those for outdoor lighting. The existing overhead utility lines traversing this site to feed
the office building at 905 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue shall be placed underground, if feasible and
acceptable to adjacent property owners;
4. That the monument-style sign for the office building not exceed six feet in height, be designed to
match the exterior materials and colors of the building and be coordinated with site landscaping;
5. That the site plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to only show sidewalk construction
for the -subject site frontage along Magnolia Drive;
6. That the site plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits showing the driveway on Magnolia
Drive with a 30-foot radius for Fire Department apparatus;
7. That the landscape plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to replace the wax myrtle
trees along the east and north sides of the property with trees acceptable to the Planning Department,
such as Southern Red Cedar or Washingtonia palms;
8. That a cross access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected properties, be recorded
and submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That a cross access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected properties, located as an
extension of the north/south drive aisle east of the office building be recorded, upon request of the
Planning Department, with the property to the south, as feasible and agreed to by both property
owners;
10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and
11. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (December 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained
within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with
successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community
0 0
February 22, 2007Deeefnber2,-2805
Lincoln - Page 3
Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development
coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application.
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.13 by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 3, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.myclearwater.com/gov/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
Michael Delk, AI
Planning Director
S:l Planning Department)C D MFLEX (FLD)IInactive or Finished ApplicationslFt Harrison Ave S 0907 -Magnolia Park Offices & Townhomes
(C+ O) - ApprovedlFt Harrison S0907 Development Order Amended 2.22.07.doc
0
Wells, Wayne
From: Guy Faber [faber@fwharchitects.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:11 AM
To: Scott Lincoln; Wells, Wayne
Cc: Andrew Hupp; Brett Lund
Subject: RE: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott,
I told Andrew he would have signed & sealed plans for permit today. They
will be submitted in advance of Dec. 20.
Guy
from Guy Faber, RA
Faber Widdows Hiatt Architects
3336 Grand Boulevard, Suite 102
Holiday, Florida 34690
p. 727.815.3336
f. 727.815.3337
e. faber@fwharchitects.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:07 AM
To: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com
Cc: Andrew Hupp; Guy Faber; Brett Lund
Subject: RE: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Wayne:
I will forward the letter request today, as I think our Architect is
attempting to meet this deadline but we certainly do not want to miss
it.
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:27 AM
To: Scott Lincoln
Subject: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott
By letter dated October 25, 2006, we sent you a courtesy notice that the
approvals for the above referenced project were set to expire. The
existing office building has now been demolished. No application for
the site and/or building plans have been submitted to-date. Should no
application for building permit be submitted on or prior to December 20,
2006, this project's approval becomes null and void. Alternately,
should a time extension for a maximum of one year be desired, a letter
of request needs to be submitted to the Planning Department (see Section
4-407 for criteria for a time extension) prior to the expiration date.
Wayne
1
0
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:07 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Andrew Hupp; Guy Faber; Brett Lund
Subject: RE: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Wayne:
I will forward the letter request today, as I think our Architect is
attempting to meet this deadline but we certainly do not want to miss
it.
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:27 AM
To: Scott Lincoln
Subject: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott
By letter dated October 25, 2006, we sent you a courtesy notice that the
approvals for the above referenced project were set to expire. The
existing office building has now been demolished. No application for
the site and/or building plans have been submitted to-date. Should no
application for building permit be submitted on or prior to December 20,
2006, this project's approval becomes null and void. Alternately,
should a time extension for a maximum of one year be desired, a letter
of request needs to be submitted to the Planning Department (see Section
4-407 for criteria for a time extension) prior to the expiration date.
Wayne
1
rI
L-A
0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 7:27 AM
To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
By letter dated October 25, 2006, we sent you a courtesy notice that the approvals for the above referenced project were
set to expire. The existing office building has now been demolished. No application for the site and/or building plans have
been submitted to-date. Should no application for building permit be submitted on or prior to December 20, 2006, this
project's approval becomes null and void. Alternately, should a time extension for a maximum of one year be
desired, a letter of request needs to be submitted to the Planning Department (see Section 4-407 for criteria for a
time extension) prior to the expiration date.
Wayne
`Clearwater
October 25, 2006
Scott Lincoln
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, Fl 33756
CITY OF CLOARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W . MYC LEAR WATER. C OM
RE: Notification of Expiration of Development Order - FLD2005-07074 - 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Dear Applicant :
This is a courtesy notification that the approvals under the above referenced Development Order for Case Number
FLD2005-07074 will expire and become null and void unless an application for a building permit is made prior to:
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
This is the only notice you will receive regarding the expiration of the above referenced case. If you have any
questions, contact me at 727-562-4504 or Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
?V'
Wayn Wells
Planner III
Development Order Expiration - FLD2005-07074 - 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
V g?,
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
Mr. Scott Lincoln, PE
LA Civil,. Inc.
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
•
C I'I'I' OF C LEARWA'TER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576
December 22, 2005
RE: Development Order - Case No. FLD2005-09102/PLT2005-00027 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Dear Mr. Lincoln:
This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6 of the Community
Development Code. On December 20, 2005, the Community Development Board reviewed your requests
for (1) Flexible Development request to permit a Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine
attached dwellings in the Commercial and Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in
the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the
Commercial District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the front (south) setback in the
Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to 16.34 feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to building),
reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to seven feet (to building),
from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side
(east) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side
(south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side
(west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback
in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and
from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in the Commercial
District from 25 feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office
District from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the visibility
triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C
and 2-1004.13, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line along South Ft.
Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south
property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement),
a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to
8.02 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line in the
Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the east property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one
foot (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the .east property line in the Office
District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to
4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-
BRIAN J. AUNGSC, MAYOR
FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYP HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER
BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COL1NCI1,;\IE\1BER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT' AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
v
December 22, 2005
Lincoln - Page 2
1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision. The Community Development Board
(CDB) APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability
Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment
efforts.
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted
to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title or Final Plat be recorded in the public
records;
3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground,
including those for outdoor lighting. The existing overhead utility lines traversing this site to feed
the office building at 905 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue shall be placed underground, if feasible and
acceptable to adjacent property owners;
4. That the monument-style sign for the office building not exceed six feet in height, be designed to
match the exterior materials and colors of the building and be coordinated with site landscaping;
5. That the site plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to only show sidewalk construction
for the subject site frontage along Magnolia Drive;
6. That the site plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits showing the driveway on Magnolia
Drive with a 30-foot radius for Fire Department apparatus;
7. That the landscape plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to replace the wax myrtle
trees along the east and north sides of the property with trees acceptable to the Planning Department,
such as Southern Red Cedar or Washingtonia palms;
8. That a cross access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected properties, be recorded
and submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That a cross access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected properties, located as an
extension of the north/south drive aisle east of the office building be recorded, upon request of the
Planning Department, with the property to the south, as feasible and agreed to by both property
owners;
10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and
11. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits.
Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible
Development approval (December 20, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained
within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with
successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a
period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The Community
Development Board may approve one additional extension of time after the community development
coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application.
December 22, 2005
Lincoln - Page 3
The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building
permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or
license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any
permits or licenses that require this prior development approval.
Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to
Section 4-502.B by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the
CDB meeting. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending
the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on January 3, 2005 (14 days
from the date of the CDB meeting).
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, Planner III, at 727-562-4504.
You can access zoning information for parcels within the City through our website:
www.Myclearwater.com/ og v/depts/planning. *Make Us Your Favorite!
Sincerely,
c?
Michael Delk, A CP
Planning Director
S: IPlanning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD) IInactive or Finished ApplicationslFt Harrison S0907 Magnolia Park Offices & Townhomes (C +
O) - ApprovedlFt Harrison S 0907 Development Order.doc
•
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 10:02 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Andrew Hupp
Subject: RE: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Wayne:
Per the request of Andrew Hupp, Please revise Condition #9 to read:
9. That a cross access easement, binding upon successors in title
to the affected properties, located as an extension of the north/south
drive aisle east of the office building be recorded, upon request of the
Planning Department, with the property to the south, as feasible and
agreed to by both property owners;
Thanks,
Scott Lincoln, PE
LA Civil
727-446-9000 x 203
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:25 PM
To: Scott Lincoln
Subject: FW: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Forgot to include: Need to know by 10 am Monday, December 19, 2005, if
the conditions suggested at the end of the Staff Report are acceptable
or not. If acceptable, your applications will be placed on the
"Consent" portion of the agenda. If not, it will be placed on the
regular portion of the agenda.
Wayne
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wells, Wayne
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:15 PM
> To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
> Subject: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 > -> 907 S. Ft. Harrison
Avenue
> Scott -
> Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application
scheduled for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting at 2:00 pm.
> Wayne
> > <<Ft Harrison S 0907 Staff Report.doc>>
1
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:25 PM
To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: FW: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Forgot to include: Need to know by 10 am Monday, December 19, 2005, if the conditions suggested at the end of the Staff
Report are acceptable or not. If acceptable, your applications will be placed on the "Consent" portion of the agenda. If not,
it will be placed on the regular portion of the agenda.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:15 PM
To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application scheduled for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting at
2:00 pm.
Wayne
Ft Harrison S 0907
Staff Repor...
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 6:15 PM
To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced application scheduled for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting at
2:00 pm.
Wayne
EZ?n
wUV1
ELJ
Ft Harrison S 0907
Staff Repor...
November 23, 2005
L •
•
Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc.
Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS (FLD2005-07074)
Magnolia Park
907 South Fort Harrison Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
LA Civil Project No.: 081-006.200
Dear Mr. Wells:
ORIGINAL
RECENED
NOV 2 3 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
We are resubmitting revised information to clarify that the proposed Office Building will be no larger than 5,250
SF (GFA per Code), thereby requiring (21) parking spaces as depicted on the Plans. Hence, no parking waiver is
being requested.
Please also see a list of previous comments and our revised responses below. For your convenience the
comments are in bold print and our responses in italics.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant. City
cannot authorize this construction.
Response: The Applicant maintains that this sidewalk is necessary to allow proper pedestrian travel from
Fort Harrison avenue to the property and townhomes along Magnolia Avenue. The Applicant is
requesting that the sidewalk be approved as proposed.
However, because the City of Clearwater apparently cannot require or authorize the Applicant
to construct the sidewalk via the City of Clearwater Land Development Code, we have removed
the sidewalk from the Plans as requested by the City.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING:
1. Provide proper striping for better flow at the curve to prevent motorists from impeding or
encroaching in opposing lanes.
Response: The requested centerline striping has been added to the Site-Plan to assist proper vehicular
circulation to and from the South Fort Harrison entrance driveway.
1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com
.* 9
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-0707f
Mr. Wayne Wells
11/23/05
Page 2 of 2
To supplement our responses, we have attached the following documents for your review:
• (15) Copies of Project Narrative
• (15) Copies of Revised Page 1 of the Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Project)
• (15) Copies of Site & Landscape Plans (8.5 " x 11" copy)
• (15) Sets of (11" x 17") and (24" x 36") Office Building Elevation Plans
• (15) Sets of 24" x 36" Revised Civil/Site Plans
If you have any questions or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
LA Civil
Scott Lin
President
ORIGINAL
RECEIVED
CC: Andrew Hupp, Hupp Realty Advisors, LLC
NOV 2 3 2005
pLANNING DEPARTMENT
CJrY OF CLEARWATER
0 0
C ITY OF C LEARWAT'ER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865
LONG RANGE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
November 17, 2005
Mr. Scott Lincoln, PE
LA Civil, Inc.
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, Florida 33756
Re: Community Development Board Meeting (Case Nos. FLD2005-09102/PLT2005-00027)
Dear Mr. Lincoln:
The Case Nos. FLD2005-09102/PLT2005-00027 for (1) Flexible Development to permit a
Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached dwellings in the Commercial and
Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District from 100
feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet
to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet
to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to 16.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side
(north) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to
the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), reductions to
the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), from
10 feet to four feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the
side (south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to
the side (west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the side
(east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet
(to pavement) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices
in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an increase to building height for
townhomes in the Office District from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to permit
buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under
the provisions of Sections 2-7041 and 2-1004.D, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along
the west property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10
feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in
the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line in the Commercial and Office
Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the
west property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to pavement) and reductions to
the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to
building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a
FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR
BILLJONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COLiNCILMEMBER
HoYr HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCII:,1EA113ER
"EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVT: ACTION EMPLOYER"
0 0
November 17, 2005
Lincoln - Page 2
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2)
Preliminary Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision, for property located at 907 S. Ft. Harrison
Avenue, has been scheduled to be reviewed by the Community Development Board on
December 20, 2005.
The meeting will take place at 2:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 3'd floor of City Hall at
112 S. Osceola Avenue, Clearwater.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 727-562-4504.
Sincerely,
7 W'dL
tn Wells, AICP
W m
Planner III
S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases) Up for the next CDBIFt Harrison S0907 Magnolia Park Offices & Townhomes (C
+ O) - 12.20.05 CDB - WWIFt. Harrison S 0907 CDR Letter.doc
• • Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 12:56 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Andrew Hupp
Subject: Magnolia Park
Wayne:
Andrew Hupp contacted me just now and indicated he will agree to modify the request/application/narrative/plans
(etc.) to adhere to a maximum Office GFA of 5250 SF thereby complying with the requirement for 21 parking
spaces as proposed on the Plans.
Please email me or call me at 727-709-6951 if you need any further clarification to put the project on the next
CDB Agenda. Also, send me a list of information you will need adjusted by me (i.e. Plans, etc.) to clean this up.
Thanks,
Scott Lincoln, PE
President
LA Civil
11/28/2005
? J
ki, VIL
Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc.
November 9, 2005
Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: RESPONSE TO DRC COMMENTS (FLD2005-07074)
Magnolia Park
907 South Fort Harrison Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33756
LA Civil Project No.: 081-006.200
Dear Mr. Wells:
ORIGINAL
R ECEIVED
Nov 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Please see a list of comments and our responses below. For your convenience the comments are in
bold print and our responses in italics.
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by
applicant. City cannot authorize this construction.
Response: The Applicant maintains that this sidewalk is necessary to allow proper pedestrian
travel from Fort Harrison avenue to the property and townhomes along Magnolia
Avenue. The Applicant is requesting that the sidewalk be approved as proposed.
2. Provide cross-access agreement with property owner to north.
Response: The applicant will provide the legal documentation to the City staff during final
Building Permit Review, as agreed at DRC.
3. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Response: Acknowledged, subject to response #2 above.
4. Prior to building permit, provide a copy of a recorded cross access agreement with
property owner to north. Cross access agreement shall be binding upon successors in
title to these properties.
Response: The applicant will provide the legal documentation to the City staff during final
1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com
• 0
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074)
Mr. Wayne Wells ORIGINAL
11/09/05 Page 2 of 12 Building Permit Review, as agreed at DRC.
5. General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity
requirements, the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense.
If underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be
completed and in-service prior to construction in accordance with Fire Department
requirements.
Response: Acknowledged,
6. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review; additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Response: Acknowledged,
FIRE:
1. Show Individual Riser Locations for each Town House. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO
CDB 10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a true 4-hour wall to consider these as individual
buildings. 2-hour walls do not eliminate the requirement of fire sprinkler systems.
Response: As agreed at DRC meeting on 11102105, Riser Locations, Rated Walls, Sprinkler
systems, if required, will be shown on construction documents when submitted for
Building Permits.
2. Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress
and egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB. 10/18/2005 new plan shows 20'
radius on Magnolia and no designation on Ft Harrison.
Response: The centerline of the access driveways and internal drive aisles provide for 30' radii
in the event of a fire truck traversing through the property. We encourage the City
Fire department to coordinate with the developer and the property owners'
association to create an emergency response plan which will clearly designate the
best fire truck route to be entry from Magnolia Avenue and exit onto Fort Harrison.
Sheet 4C of the Plans delineates this route and again, demonstrates 30' radii. It is
our opinion that the 20' radial returns on the Magnolia avenue driveway and the
urban flare design required by FDOT on Fort Harrison avenue will not impede
emergency vehicle access or travel.
3. Show Fire Mains for each building. PRIOR TO CDB 10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a
true 4-hour wall to consider these as individual buildings. 2 hour walls do not eliminate
the requirement of fire sprinkler systems ? EC""WED
Nov 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074)
Mr. Wayne Wells
11/09/05
Page 3 of 12
RECEVED •
NOV 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
Response: As agreed at DRC meeting on 11102105, Riser Locations, Rated Walls, Sprinkler
systems, if required, will be shown on construction documents when submitted for
Building Permits.
4. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13R in Town Houses is required.
PRIOR TO CDB 10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a true 4-hour wall to consider these as
individual buildings. 2-hour walls do not eliminate the requirement of fire sprinkler
systems.
Response: As agreed at DRC meeting on 11102105, Riser Locations, Rated Walls, Sprinkler
systems, if required, will be shown on construction documents when submitted for
Building Permits.
LANDSCAPING:
1. 10/26/05 - WW: Comment below is still applicable. Also, lights on west side of both
townhome buildings will interfere with balconies. Revise.
8/26/05 - WW: Site lighting on light poles shown on Sheet 4 conflicts with landscaping,
especially trees, shown on Sheet L-1. Trees will grow and shield out the lights, thus
voiding any benefits anticipated by site lighting. Then the owners will want to trim or
remove the trees. To avoid this future scenario, relocate light poles out of the landscape
islands.
Response: Site lighting poles utilized to light the office parking lot will be designed and
positioned to eliminate conflicts with trees. In addition, the townhomes will be lighted
on the exterior by wall mounted lamps
2. 10/26/05 - WW: Comment below is still applicable. There are only two interior
landscape islands provided and there are/will be conflicts between the lights and the
trees. Additionally, the cabbage palms indicated on the east side of the office building on
the south side of the walkway has inadequate planting area, due to the second floor,
which does not seem to be accounted for.
8/26/05 - WW Ensure those areas indicated as "interior landscaping" can actually meet
the landscape material requirements of the Code, especially for trees. One example is the
island with the lift station that appears suspect of not being able to meet the
requirements.
Response: Site lighting poles utilized to light the office parking lot will be designed and
positioned to eliminate conflicts with trees. The cabbage palms have been removed.
The total provided interior green (as tabulated on Sheet 4B) meets the code
requirement of 10% of the vehicular use area. The intent of the landscape plans is to
meet the landscape material requirements where possible.
3. Sheet 4B - Shading is very light. Please darken. However, areas under the second floor of
i
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074)
Mr. Wayne Wells
11/09/05
RECEIVED 0
NOV 0 8 2005
ORIGINAL
Page 4 of 12
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
the office building do not qualify for interior greenspace (anything planted will not grow
due to no sunlight. Note - Staff does not count the parking area under the building as
vehicular use area since it cannot be planted. Ensure calculations reflect such). Ensure
Interior Green Areas indicated meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 with the
minimum square footage, dimensions and plant materials. Revise calculations and plan.
Response: The total provided interior green (as tabulated on Sheet 4B) meets the code
requirement of 10% of the vehicular use area. The shading used has been darkened
for clarity.
4. A monument-type sign is shown on Sheet 4 west of the office building. However,
landscaping on Sheet L-1 has not been coordinated with this proposed sign. Revise Sheet
L-1.
Response: Sheet L-1 now reflects the office monument sign.
5. Information on the site plan documents and in the Narrative conflict regarding the
provision of Interior Green Space area. Sheet 1 in the Site Data indicates 8.6% being
proposed, which is a reduction from the required 10%. Sheet 4B indicates 13,699 square
feet of total interior green area being provided, which equals the total VITA of 13, 699
square feet. The Narrative indicates a reduction is being requested from the 10%
required to 8%. It is unclear what square footage of Interior Green Area is being
provided due to these inconsistencies. Provide on Sheet 4B the square footage for each
interior landscaped area, including the total square footage.
Response: The total provided interior green (as tabulated on Sheet 4B) meets the code
requirement of 10% of the vehicular use area. The shading used has been darkened
for clarity. A waiver is no longer requested.
6. Inadequate justification has been submitted regarding the reductions to the landscape
buffers and interior landscape area requirements.
Response: The total provided interior green (as tabulated on Sheet 4B) meets the code
requirement of 10% of the vehicular use area. The shading used has been darkened
for clarity. A waiver is no longer requested.
As for the buffer widths, deviations from the required widths are being requested to
meet parking requirements, provide proper vehicular circulation, and to provide
improvements such as stormwater retention, which non-existent in the property's
present condition.
7. Revise Sheet 4B and the Project Narrative, Requested Deviations from the Development
Standards #15 to show a 10-foot requirement (not five-foot).
Response: Revised Project Narrative is attached herein.
L
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074)
Mr. Wayne Wells
11/09/05
Page 5 of 12
PARKS AND RECREATION:
RE CE9MEDD 0 ORIGINAL
NOY 0 8 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
1. Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final
plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is
recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment.
Response: Acknowledged.
SOLID WASTE:
1. That dumpster enclosure needs to be built to City code. Allow 120 footprint for
recycling carts for townhomes or will townhomes be on black barrel/yellow bin service?
Response: The dumpster enclosure is proposed for office and townhome trash in accordance
with City Index 701 and will have a 12'x 3' pad area at the rear for recycle carts, as
requested at DRC.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING:
1. Accessible route from public sidewalk to building's accessible entrance is not acceptable.
Width of path is not to Florida Building code ADA Chapter 11 standards. Also accessible
route must be located where a user is not compelled to walk or wheel behind a parked
vehicle.
Response: The subject route has been revised on the Site Plan along with relocation of the
Handicap parking space (See Sheet 4 of the Plans).
2. Provide proper striping for better flow at the curve to prevent motorists from impeding
or encroaching in opposing lanes.
Response: The internal drive aisles have a centerline radius of 30' which should allow for simple
vehicular navigation without the need to stripe the pavement similar to a public road.
3. Remove parking stall inside sight visibility triangle.
Response: Provided for on revised Site Plan Sheet 4.
4. Provide wheel stops for parking spaces adjacent to office building.
Response: Provided for on revised Site Plan Sheet 4.
5. Provide a detail showing a scaled passenger car backing out of the garage where the
motorist's sight visibility is not obstructed prior to the vehicles bumper entering the
roadway.
RECEIVED
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074) NOV 0 8 2005 Mr. Wayne Wells
ORIGINAL
11/09/05
Page 6 of 12 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATEP
Response: See Sheet 4C showing a vehicle backing out of the townhome garage and
demonstrating the driver's sight line.
6. Provide ramps with truncated domes per FDOT roadway design standards for driveway
on Magnolia Drive.
Response: The proposed pedestrian ramps are labeled on the Site Plan to be constructed in
accordance with FDOT criteria with truncated domes.
7. All of the*above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Response: Acknowledged.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
1. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee
schedule.
Response: Acknowledged.
2. Obtain FDOT permit for work within the state road right-of-way.
Response: Acknowledged.
PLANNING:
1. 10/26/05 - WW: Since Harbor Oaks is removing the power lines related to their project
and the power line to the existing building on this property is being removed, and since
the power line that traverses the subject property north/south will only provide power to
the office building to the north, is there any ability to place this traversing power line
underground or install conduit(s) for the future undergrounding when the office building
to the north is redeveloped?
8/25/05 - WW: Code requires underground electric and communication lines on-site.
Response: The applicant has agreed to comply with this request where possible, notwithstanding
refusal by adjacent property owners to cooperate.
2. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of
the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by,
the CDB;
Response: Acknowledged
3. Potential condition to be included in Staff Report: That a cross-access easement be
recorded, upon request of the Planning Department, with the property to the south.
Response: Acknowledged, notwithstanding refusal by adjacent property owners to cooperate.
0 RECEIVED 0
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074)
Mr. Wayne Wells
11/09/05 NOV 0 8 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 7 of 12 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
4. Sheet 3 - Remove the sidewalk connector in the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW between
the public sidewalk and the roadway curb.
Response: The Applicant maintains that this sidewalk is necessary to allow proper pedestrian
travel from Fort Harrison avenue to the property and townhomes along Magnolia
Avenue. The Applicant is requesting that the sidewalk be approved as proposed.
5. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department
requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
Response: Acknowledged
6. Based on the office building having a flat roof, provide the height to that point on the
elevation drawings. Since the cupola looks to include the upper portion of the elevator,
the cupola will not be included in any request to increase the height of the building
(above 25 feet).
Response: The flat roof will be constructed to a height of 31 '-0 ". See attached revised
Building Elevations.
7. 10/26/05 - WW: Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response:
Provide specific examples of HOW this proposal will "upgrade the immediate vicinity,"
especially in light of all of the reductions and deviations requested.
Response: See revised Project Narrative which elaborates further regarding the application
criteria.
8. Revise Mixed Use calculation on Sheets 1 and 4 to the following: 10/26/05 Mixed Use
Calculation for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue.
a. Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0. 55 and maximum
density = 24 du/acre in CG land use) and Office District (maximum FAR = 0.50
and maximum density =15 du/acre in R/OG land use).
b. Project area 36,040 sf
c. Land area zoned Commercial District 10,184 sf
d. Permitted FAR in Commercial District 0.55
e. Floor area permitted in Commercial District 5,601 sf
f. Land area zoned Office District 25,856 sf
g. Permitted FAR in Office District 0.50
h. Permitted FAR in Commercial District 5,601 sf
i. Floor area proposed -5,214 sf
j. Subtract #9 from #8 (floor area not used in C District 387 sf
k. Land area not used in C District (#10 divided by #6) 774 sf
1. Land area available in C District for attached dwellings 774 sf
m. Divide by square footage in an acre 43,560 sf
n. Lot acreage available for att. dw. in C District ((#12 - #13) 0.017 acre
o. Multiply lot acreage (#14) 0.017 acre
0 RECEVED
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074)
Mr. Wayne Wells NOV 0 8 2005
11/09/05
Page 8 of 12 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
ORIGINAL
p. By maximum density in CG land use x 24 du/acre
q. Number of dwelling units (du) available in C District 0.408 du
r. Land area in Office District 25,856 sf
s. Divide by square footage in an acre 43,560 sf
t. Lot acreage in Office District 0.593 acre
u. Multiply lot acreage (#20) 0.593 acre
v. By maximum density in R/OG land use x 15 du/acre
w. Number of dwelling units (du) available in Office District 8.895 du
x. Number of dwelling units available in C District 0.408 du
y. Number of dwelling units available in Office District 8.895 du
z. Total number of dwelling units permitted on overall property (add #17 plus #23)
9.303 du
aa. Total maximum permissible on overall property is 5,214 GFA office plus nine
dwelling units.
Response: See the revised Mixed Use FAR & Density calculations on the Site Plan.
9. 10/26/05 - WW: Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW: General Applicability criteria #5 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "consistent with the community character of the surrounding
area."
Response: See revised Project Narrative which elaborates further regarding the application
criteria.
10. 10/26/05 - WW: Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW: General Applicability criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this development be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and
character of adjacent properties."
Response: See revised Project Narrative which elaborates further regarding the application
criteria.
11. Proposed dumpster at the east end of the cross access on the north side impedes the 24-
foot wide drive aisle to access the parking on the property to the north. Revise to provide
this 24-foot drive aisle access by removing one adjacent parking space and shifting
dumpster eastward (Note: There are four excess parking spaces being provided over the
minimum required parking for the offices).
Response: The dumpster enclosure has been relocated and parking has been reduced to (21)
spaces, requiring a waiver of (1) required parking space.
12. 10/26/05 - WW: Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response:
Provide specific examples of HOW "flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks
and height are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate
vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole."
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-0707 40 RECEVED
Mr. Wayne Wells
11/09/05 NOV p g 2005 ORIGINAL Page 9 of 12
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Response: See revised Project Narrative which elaborates further regarding the application
criteria.
13. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees
be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
Response: Acknowledged.
14. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any
permits, either a Unity of Title or a Final Plat be recorded in the public records;
Response: Acknowledged.
15. 10/26/05 & 8/26/05 - WW Show on Sheet 4 and L-1 the balconies indicated on the
elevations, including the distance from the face of the building to the edge of the
balconies. Section 3-908.1) permits balconies to extend no more than two feet into a
required setback area. Balconies indicated are proposed at 2.5 feet and will need to be
included in the request for setback reduction. Provide justification for the balconies
extending greater than two feet.
Response: The architect has reduced the balconies to 2.0' width.
16. 10/26/05 - WW: Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide
specific examples of HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations
from the use, intensity and development standards."
Response: See revised Project Narrative which elaborates further regarding the application
criteria.
17. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from
the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground, including outdoor
lighting lines;
Response: Acknowledged.
18. 10/26/05 - WW: Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW: Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response:
Provide specific examples of HOW this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land
uses."
Response: See revised Project Narrative which elaborates further regarding the application
criteria.
19. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the
requirements of the Code and any future freestanding signs be a monument-style sign,
Magnolia Park LD2005-07074 RECEIVED 40
)
Mr. Wayne Wells
11/09/05 NOV 0 8 2005
Page 10 of 12
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF E e R1l??TER
designed to match the exterior materials and color o t e building;
Response: Acknowledged.
ORIGINAL
20. 10/26/05 - WW: Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response: Provide
specific examples of HOW this proposal "creates a form and function which enhances
the community character of the immediate vicinity" and for "the City of Clearwater as a
whole."
Response: See revised Project Narrative which elaborates further regarding the application
criteria.
21. Revise architectural site plan on west side of five-unit townhome building to remove the
dumpster, since the civil site plan relocated the dumpster westward.
Response: The Architectural Plans have been revised as requested and attached herein.
22. Provide the scale of the drawings for the elevations for the townhome buildings (both
four- and five-unit buildings).
Response: The Architectural Plans have been revised as requested and attached herein.
23. Please be aware that the Harbor Oaks project to the north recently installed a six-foot
high wall along the common property line with this project. This may affect the location
of landscaping, handrails along the edge of the retention pond, etc.
Response: The applicant is aware and does not see any concerns as long as the wall and footer
are not on the applicant's property.
24. The property today is developed with a 6,486 one-story office building set back 10 feet
from the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue front property line and a large parking area that has no
landscaping and is at a zero setback to adjacent property lines. The proposal is to
remove the existing building and construct a 5,214 square foot two-story office building
at a 10-foot front setback to S. Ft. Harrison Avenue and nine three-story townhomes on
the east side. Much of the pavement is still proposed at a zero setback. There are
numerous setback and landscape buffering reductions requested.
The Staff concern is that in the redevelopment of property there is supposed to be
improvement to the site. With this proposal conformance with Code requirements
(setbacks, landscaping, etc.) is required. The proposal is requesting numerous setback
and landscape buffering reductions. The Mixed Use criteria calls for an improved site
plan, landscaping in excess of the minimum, improved design and appearance and more
efficient parking. It is Staffs opinion that the site design is an improvement over the
existing situation, that the parking is more efficient and that the appearance will be
Ir"ECEIVED
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074)
ORIGINAL
Mr. Wayne Wells NOV o 8 2005
11/09/05
Page 11 of 12 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
significantly improved over the existing. However, it is still a Staff concerned with the
reductions requested to landscaping standards. It is recognized that the site size and
configuration presents design constraints. It is further recognized that the existing
surrounding character is one of reduced front setbacks.
Response: The Applicant shares the Staff's understanding that this project is a major
improvement over the existing conditions and cannot be possible without exercising
flexibility and deviation from strict design criteria as allowed by the comprehensive
infill process.
25. The Comprehensive Landscape Program anticipates that where reductions to landscape
standards are requested in certain areas of the site, there will be increases in other areas
of the site. With this being said, and with the Code criteria presumption that landscaping
will be in excess of the minimum, Staffs support of the project is based on trying to get
as much landscaping on the site as possible. Since the minimum parking is being
exceeded by four parking spaces, it is recommended to remove these four excess parking
spaces. One will be lost to the relocation of the dumpster, but the next adjacent parking
space could also be lost to be turned into landscaping (with a shade tree). Traffic wants
the southern parking space adjacent to Magnolia Drive removed from the visibility
triangle. The handicap parking space will need to relocate to be under the southern part
of the building and the current location can be redesigned to two parking spaces,
narrowing the terminal landscape island to the west by one foot, but the island can be
lengthened due to the removal of the handicap accessible path. Due to the location of the
lift station and desired light pole that will restrict tree planting in this terminal landscape
island, recommend eliminating the parking space to the west of the island to create a
larger island (plant with a shade tree). Would like to see as much of the parking area
southeast of the office building placed in landscaping (with shade trees). The retention
pond could be planted with cypress trees. Parking lot light poles should be strategically
placed (and potentially the height of the poles) to avoid conflicts with the future tree
canopies. Sidewalks providing access to the townhomes facing Magnolia Drive can be
narrowed. Any other location where additional landscaping can be placed should be
explored. Could the parking area be redesigned to provide angled parking (one-way flow
to the east), increasing landscaping?
Response: The applicant is willing to work with Staff to get as mush landscaping on the property
as possible while giving reasonable consideration to survivability of the plant
material. In demonstration, the applicant has removed 4 parking spaces to improve
interior green areas.
RECE
• IVE® •
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-07074)
Mr. Wayne Wells NOV o s 2005 ORIGINAL
11/09/05
Page 12 of 12 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CLEARWATER
To supplement our responses, we have attached the following documents for your review:
• (15) Copies of Project Narrative
• (15) Copies of Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Project)
• (15) Copies of Owners Letter of Authorization
• (15) Copies of Site & Landscape Plans (8.5 " x 11" copy)
a (15) Copies of Building Elevations & Floor Plans (8.5 " x 11
• (15) Copies of Property Deed(s)
• (15) Copies Property Appraiser Record Card
• (15) Copies of ITE Trip Generation Analysis
• (15) Copies of Stormwater Design Narrative, Drainage Calculations & Underdrain Analysis
• (15) Copies of an Application for Plat Approval
• (15) Comprehensive Landscape Application
• (15) Copies of (11" x 17") and (24" x 36") Office & Townhome Floor Plans
• (15) Sets of (11" x 17") and (24" x 36") Office & Townhome Building Elevation Plans
• (15) Sets of 24" x 36" Revised Civil/Site Plans
• (15) Copies of Survey (in Civil Plans)
If you have any questions or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
LA Civil
Scott LinV,E
President
CC: Andrew Hupp, Hupp Realty Advisors, LLC
Jeff Smith, JW Smith Design
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:45 PM
To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: FW: FLD2005-07074 - 907 S Ft Harrison
Scott -
Need to address ASAP.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Rice, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:36 PM
To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett
Subject: FLD2005-07074 - 907 S Ft Harrison
Two conditions were not met in the resubmittal for the subject case:
ENGINEERING
A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant. City cannot authorize
this construction. 11/9/05 - SIDEWALK NOT DELETED
TRAFFIC
Provide proper striping for better flow at the curve to prevent motorists from impeding or encroaching in
opposing lanes. 11/9/05 - NOT MET
D. Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyClearwater.com
•
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 5:42 PM
To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: Draft 11.3.05 DRC comments, 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached are the Draft comments for the November 3, 2005, DRC meeting for FLD2005-07074, 907 South Ft. Harrison
Avenue, at 3:20 pm.
Wayne
1
draft 11.3.05 dre
action agend...
•
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 5:47 PM
To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: FLD2005-07074 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
I am attaching the mixed use calculation that shows up in the Draft DRC comments. This is a better copy for your use.
Wayne
Mixed Use
:alculation for 907 ..
U
September 29, 2005
Wayne Wells
4t%i,V,lL
Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc.
ORIGINAL
City of Clearwater Planning Department I r
100 S. Myrtle Ave. RKMAN Ll 0 1NR ?
Clearwater, FL 33756
SE? 3 0 2005
Re: Magnolia Park (Magnolia & Ft. Harrison) Case No: FLD2005-07074 @ 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue LA Civil Project No.: 081-006.200 NING' ? 1 SVad
.....?..... CITY (161- -
Dear Mr. Wells:
Please see a list of comments and our responses below. For your convenience the comments are in bold
print and our responses in italics.
General Engineering:
1. A sanitary sewer manhole is located in Magnolia Drive 150 east of manhole in S. Ft.
Harrison Ave. where proposed force main tap is to be made. Revise plan to show f.m.
connection to manhole in Magnolia Drive. 9/2/05 - Applicant reviewed the system with Don.
He believes there is some problem with the manhole we suggested or the line between this
manhole and the one he proposed to use. Applicant was told that before building permit he
needs to investigate further and justify his proposed plan.
Response: Acknowledged. However, the Plan has not been revised yet until the Applicant has had
an opportunity to conduct a video survey of the sewer system.
2. Delete sheets 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12. Resubmit these sheets for building permit review.
Response: The above sheets have been removed from the Plan Set prior to Building Permitting.
3. Retention pond cannot be located on a separate lot. Combine Tracts A and B.
Response: Tract B has been eliminated and the retention pond will be included in the Common Area
Tract A. Please see revised Preliminary Plat.
4. Words "City of Clearwater" shall not be on any privately owned manhole covers.
Response: The Utility Plan has been notated accordingly along with the Sanitary Sewer Structure
Chart.
1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com
Magnolia Park (FLD20050074)
September 29, 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 2 of 14
5. Preliminary Plat: Provide property owner address and telephone on the preliminary plat
and reference the section, township and range in which the property is located.
Response: Please see revised Preliminary Plat.
6. A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant.
Will proposed sidewalk, (not a driving surface), interfere with access to property owned by
other(s)? All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Response: The proposed sidewalk is intended as logical restoration along the route for the proposed
sanitary sewer force main. In addition, the sidewalk provides a needed and desired
pedestrian access from south Fort Harrison to the Townhome frontage on Magnolia
Drive. We discussed this issue in detail with the City staff at our previous DRC meeting.
The City contends that a sidewalk placed in the RIW would impede the adjacent owner
from parking in the R/W. The City claimed this is a grandfathered condition that we
cannot interrupt. However, we think providing proper pedestrian and handicapped
access should override the City's concerns. Furthermore, id a sidewalk is allowed to be
installed, the adjacent owner could still violate the law as freely as occurs today.
The following to be addressed prior to building permit:
1. Final plat must be recorded with Pinellas County prior to a Building Permit being issued
for any vertical construction (Development Code 4-708).
Response: Acknowledged.
2. Provide a copy of a recorded cross-access agreement with property owner to north. Cross
access agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to the properties.
Response: Acknowledged. Please see the attached easement document.
3. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up
to standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.)
Response: The Site Plan has been revised to notate Truncated domes per D. 0. T. Index #304 at the
specified sidewalk ramps.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional
comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Response: Acknowledged.
Environmental:
1. Pond Cross-section indicates pond is existing, however, current City Standards prohibit
vertical walls in retention ponds that are located along the boundaries of adjacent parcels of
land. Please revise.
SS EP 3 0 2005
Magnolia Park (FLD2005i 074)
September 29, 2005
Page 3 of 14 ORIGINAL
Fire:
1. ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING
JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE
RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
CODE 2004 EDITION.
Response: Acknowledged and noted on the Utility Plans.
2. Entrance on Fort Harrison SHALL be 24 foot in width
Response: The entrance has been revised to be 24' width as requested.
3. Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building access as
hose lays. PRIOR TO CDB
Response: Afire hydrant exists at eh NE corner of South Fort Harrison & Magnolia. A second fire
hydrant is proposed at along the Magnolia drive frontage for the Townhomes.
4. Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress
and egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB.
Response: The center line geometry and radii for the internal drive aisle as well as the curb returns
are 30' radii as shown on the Site Plan.
5. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R in Town Houses is required.
PRIOR TO CDB
Response: As per the 2004 Building Code, the three story townhomes are Type III
Construction, and R-2 Occupancy. When not more than three stories a 2 HR
Separation between townhomes is required. A sprinkler system is not required.
6. Is New Office Building to be Sprinklered?
Response: Not required by new code.
7. Show Individual Riser Locations for each Town House. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO
CDB
Response: Asper the 2004 Building Code, the three story townhomes are Type III
Construction, and R-2 Occupancy. When not more than three stories a 2 HR
Separation between townhomes is required. A sprinkler system is not required.
8. No Unprotected openings within 10' of Exit Stair in accordance with NFPA 101, 2003
Edition. PRIOR TO PERMIT
Response: The exterior stairway has been removed. O L ( LS 47 P, F.'
9. Dumpster must be 10' from building. PRIOR TO CDB
SAD 3 0 2005
Magnolia Park (FLD2005-i 074) •
September 29, 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 4 of 14
Response.: The single dumpster enclosure has been relocated away from the town homes.
10. Show Fire Mains for each Town Home. PRIOR TO CDB
Response: As per the 2004 Building Code, the three story townhomes are Type III Construction, and
R-2 Occupancy. When not more than three stories a 2 HR Separation between
townhomes is required. A sprinkler system is not required.
Harbor Master:
1. No Issues.
Legal:
1. No Issues.
Land Resources:
1. No Issues.
Landscaping:
1. As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program application, indicate all landscape
requirements (including buffers) requested to be waived or modified. Provide the
justification for each reduction requested.
Response: Please see the revised Project Narrative for the Requested Deviations from the Code for
Buffers.
2. Unclear how the shaded area indicating "interior green area" close to the bottom of the
retention pond will meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 Code for landscaping
materials within the interior green area (since it could be wet).
Response: We have removed the Pond Area from the interior green area tabulation.
3. Site lighting on light poles shown on Sheet 4 conflicts with landscaping, especially trees,
shown on Sheet L-1. Trees will grow and shield out the lights, thus voiding any benefits
anticipated by site lighting. Then the owners will want to trim or remove the trees. To avoid
this future scenario, relocate light poles out of the landscape islands.
Response: The light poles in conflict with trees have been relocated.
4. Ensure those areas indicated as "interior landscaping" can actually meet the landscape
material requirements of the Code, especially for trees. One example is the island with the
lift station that appears suspect of not being able to meet the requirements.
0 ?c c
3 0 2005
PLAN t ING& pEvk:t_p?'^ T 5vC5
?1TX QF 3' `A .
•
Magnolia Park (FLD2005- 074) September 29, 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 5 of 14
Response: The landscape material has been proposed to meet the intent of the Code. The subject
island mentioned above has been increased in planting area by removal of the cross walk
and is adequate for a tree.
Parks and Recreation:
1. Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final
plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is
recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment.
Response: Acknowledged.
Stormwater:
1. Before Building Permit
a. Dry ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less.
Response: Acknowledged. Previously submitted calculations demonstrate a drawdown time less than 24
hours via the underdrain system.
Solid Waste:
1. That dumpster enclosure needs to be built to City code. Allow 120 footprint for recycling
carts for townhomes or will townhomes be on black barrel/yellow bin service?
Response: The single dumpster enclosure is proposed to be constructed in accordance with City of
Clearwater Standard Index 701.
Traffic Engineering:
1. Remove monument sign from within sight visibility triangle.
Response: The monument sign has been removed from the Townhome frontage on Magnolia Drive.
However, a monument sign is proposed on the South Fort Harrison Avenue frontage to
identify the office building and tenants.
2. Show geometric features East of the property i.e. is there a roadway or property that the
road connects to, or is it a dead end? If it is a dead end, show end of roadway markers.
Response: Dead End Markers are specified on the revised Site Plan.
3. Roadway width must meet the City's Fire Department requirements.
Response: The interior drive aisles are proposed to be 24' width minimum.
4. Show that a vehicle can back out of garage without impairing motorist's sight visibility
especially adjacent to a pedestrian pathway.
p RC?[OIC
p 3
Magnolia Park (FLD20050074) •
September 29, 2005 ® R I G I KN A L
Page 6 of 14
Response: The town home footprints have been revised and reduced in size. This adjustment
allowed for removal of the sidewalks along the garage-side of the townhomes thereby
providing safe backing distance and prevention of pedestrian conflicts with vehicles
backing out of garages.
5. Minimum required width of Drive Aisle to Ft. Harrison is 24-feet; plan shows only 22-feet.
Response: The entrance has been revised to be 24' width as requested.
6. Per Community Development Code Sec. 3-904 (A), sight visibility triangles are to be
measured from property lines, not back of curb. Objects must not encroach in sight
visibility triangles unless they meet the height limitations i.e. building inside sight triangle
may be problematic.
Response: The sight triangles have been adjusted as required. Where possible, all proposed
structures and landscaping have been removed from the sight triangles.
7. Show an accessible path from public sidewalk to proposed office building's accessible
entrance.
Response: An accessible path 3' wide is proposed on the south side of the office building.
Planninz
1. 8/14/05 - WW Indicate the second 7" oak tree from the south property line to also be
removed. 8/8/05 - WW Indicate on Sheet 3 and Sheet L-1 all trees proposed to be removed.
Response: All trees proposed to be removed have been struck with an `X" on the Demolition Plan
and the Landscape Plan as requested.
2. Revise the required office parking on Sheet 1 from 25 spaces to 23 spaces.
Response: Since the proposed office building has been modified to have a total area of 6,069 SF
with internal stairways and elevator space of 855 SF, the building GFA is now 5,214 SF. The required
parking is calculated to be 5,214 SF * 4 spaces11, 000 SF GFA = 21 spaces. The Site Data has been
revised accordingly.
3. Provide the dimension from the front property line along Magnolia Drive to the edge of
pavement on the west side of the driveway.
Response: A dimension of 7.34' has been added to the Site Plan.
4. Sheet 4 - Revise the visibility triangles on S. Ft. Harrison to the property line from the
pavement line.
Response: The visibility triangles have been revised as requested. D
D 3 10230"605'?J
PLANNWG & 0EVELQPmt:N'1 SVG
Magnolia Park (FLD20050074)
September 29, 2005
Page 7 of 14
0 ORIGINAL
5. At the east end of the cross access on the north side, is there adequate turning movements
for fire truck to not only access the subject property but also the property to the north?
With the proposed landscape island at this east end of the cross access, how does the
location of this landscape island affect access to and/or actual parking layout on the parking
for the property to the north? Show parking layout for the parking lot to the north and
revise this proposed parking lot appropriately to avoid impacts on vehicular turning
movements and access.
Response: Whether the Fire truck was to access the propertyfrom South Fort Harrison or Magnolia
Drive, the movement will be a left-in movement and a right-out movement. All entry, exit
and internal travel movements can be demonstrated to meet the 30' radius criteria
required by the Fire Department. See the Site Plan for the centerline and curb geometry.
6. Access to the southwesternmost townhome is via the drive aisle, no sidewalk access (all
other units have sidewalk access)?
Response: Based on the revised footprints and access points for the townhomes pedestrian access is
possible to each unit. The four unit south townhomes all have access from the Magnolia
Drive sidewalk.
7. Building Code requires a stoop/landing at the end (ground floor) of the open stairs on the
north side of the office building. Show on all appropriate sheets.
Response: The Office Building is 7' from the south property line and is unlimited as to wall
openings as per Table 704.8 g.
8. Demonstrate compliance with Building Code requirements for the south side of the office
building for the percentage of openings allowed, based on the closeness of the proposed
building to the property line, as well as the building to the south being at a 2.8-foot setback
to the common property line. Also, demonstrate compliance with Building Code
requirements for location of windows with respect to the required egress stairs on the north
side of the building.
Response: The Office Building is 7' from the south property line and the roof overhang is no closer
than 3' to the property line. The egress stairs on the north side of the building have been
eliminated.
9. Provide the dimension from the face of the building to the edge for the roof overhang on the
elevations for the office building.
Response: The required dimensions are provided on the Site Plan.
10. Site plan indicates an eight-foot wide sidewalk from the. public sidewalk within the Ft.
Harrison right-of-way to the front of the building. However, neither the floor plan for the
ground floor of this building nor the west elevation provides any entrance on the west side
of this building. Revise the site plan sheets, or the floor plan and west building elevation.
Response: The 8' walk has been eliminated.
pli sE R s n 2005 ' ! I
PLANN'r-i s uc , t . y . "FA
CS!
Magnolia Park (FLD200*74)
September 29, 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 8 of 14
11. Unclear why the site plans indicate a sidewalk is to be installed within the Magnolia Drive
ROW for the frontage of an adjacent property owner (909 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue) and the
construction of a H/C ramp on S. Ft. Harrison at the intersection (in front of Jannelli's
property). This is Dr. Jannelli's parking lot, with parking spaces out in the ROW of
Magnolia Drive.
Response: The proposed sidewalk is intended as logical restoration along the route for the proposed
sanitary sewer force main. In addition, the sidewalk provides a needed and desired
pedestrian access from south Fort Harrison to the Townhome frontage on Magnolia.
Drive. We discussed this issue in detail with the City staff at our previous DRC meeting.
The City contends that a sidewalk placed in the RIW would impede the adjacent owner
from parking in the R/W. The City claimed this is a grandfathered condition that we
cannot interrupt. However, we think providing proper pedestrian and handicapped
access should override the City's concerns. Furthermore, id a sidewalk is allowed to be
installed, the adjacent owner could still violate the law as freely as occurs today.
12. Unclear as to why crosswalks at the west side of the townhomes, along with the little piece
of sidewalk within the landscape island, are being installed. Advise/revise.
Response: Cross walks referenced have been removed.
13. Sheet 4 - Sign on Magnolia Drive must meet a five-foot setback to property lines.
Response: The monument sign has been removed from the Townhome frontage on Magnolia Drive.
However, a monument sign is proposed on the South Fort Harrison Avenue frontage to
identify the office building and tenants.
14. Any freestanding signage proposed for the office building? If so, show the location and
setback on Sheets 4 and L-1.
Response: A monument sign is proposed on the South Fort Harrison Avenue frontage to identify the
office building and tenants.
15. Sheet 4, 4B, 5, 6 and L-1 are inconsistent with the floor plans (ground and second) for the
office for the east side of the building, as there is building and concrete covering most of the
interior green area shown at this building entrance. Revise all appropriate sheets.
Response: The Plans above and the Floor Plans have been revised herein to be consistent.
16. Observation: The northwesternmost unit, with the front door on the west side of the unit,
does not seem very desirable due to the dumpster location (which one must walk past to get
to the front door).
Response: The dumpster enclosure has been relocated.
17. Based on a Mixed Use calculation with a 5,652 square-foot office building, only a maximum
of eight dwellings is permitted on this property (nine proposed). Cannot round up, per
Section 3-902.D. Reduce by one dwelling unit.
-11 T5 T
O
SEP 3 0 2005
.? 1
PLANNING ? ijt qj t 1F r.: t SVCSl
QTY if C.i . ,??:Wc1! >' {
Magnolia Park (FLD2005074) •
September 29, 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 9 of 14
Mixed Use Calculation for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum density = 24
du/acre) and Office District (maximum FAR = 0.50 and maximum density =15 du/acre)
1. Project area= 36,040 sf
2. Land area zoned Commercial District= 10,184 sf
3. Permitted FAR in Commercial District= 0.55
4. Floor area permitted in Commercial District= 5,601 sf
5. Land area zoned Office District= 25,856 sf
6. Permitted FAR in Office District= 0.50
7. Floor area permitted in Office District= 12,928 sf
8. Floor area proposed= 5,652 sf
9. Permitted FAR in Commercial District #4= 5,601 sf
10. Subtract #9 from #8 (floor area attributable to Office District= 52 sf
11. Land area attributable in Office District (#10 divided by #6)= 102 sf
12. Land area available in Office District for attached dwellings (#5 minus #11) 25,754 sf
13. Land area in an acre= 43,560 sf
14. Lot acreage for attached dwellings (#12 divided by #13)= 0.591acres
15. Multiply lot acreage (#14)= 0.591acres
16. Maximum density in Office District= 15 du/acre
17. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted= 8 du
Response: The FAR & Density Calculations are presented on the Site Plan to demonstrate the
10, 009 SF of the 10,184 SF of "C" Zoned property to be used for the office building at a
FAR limit of 0.55. This results in a GFA of 5,505 SFfor the office building such that the
remainder of the property results in the use of both "C" and "O " zoned properties to
allow (9) townhome units.
18. Coordinate the location and number of windows and doors on the first and second floors
with that depicted on the office building elevations (currently inconsistent).
Response: Please refer to the revised Architectural Plans attached herein.
19. Code requires underground electric and communication lines on-site.
Response: Acknowledged.
20. Sheet 3 - Remove the sidewalk connector in the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW between the
public sidewalk and the roadway curb.
Response: The sidewalk has been removed.
21. Potential condition to be included in Staff Report: That a cross-access easement be
recorded, upon request of the Planning Department, with the property to the south.
Response: Acknowledged.
22. Revise your "Requested Deviations" to that listed by Staff above. (Note: There is no
parking reduction requested). D (? 1
SE. 3 0 2005 ?
PLANNiN,' I SVCS
(41N
Magnolia Park (FLD20050074)
September 29, 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 10 of 14
Response: Please see the revised Project Narrative for the Requested Deviations from the Code.
23. Today the property is developed with a 6,486 square-foot office building (square footage
has probably not been calculated per the definition of gross floor area) with a parking lot
that is at a zero setback to property lines and the eastern portion vacant.
The proposal removes the one-story office building to construct a two-story office building,
essentially at the same setbacks and square footage as presently, with a parking lot at a zero
setback to property lines, with townhomes introduced (at requested reduced setbacks).
Other than a redeveloped site with more on the site and a new office building, Staff is
unclear what benefit the City is receiving. The Community Development Code is a
performance based Code, where there is supposed to be improvements OVER THAT
EXISTING to the site through redevelopment. Mixed use criteria calls for an improved site
plan, landscaping in excess of the minimum, improved design and appearance and more
efficient parking. Unclear how these criteria are being achieved through this proposal.
Additionally, due to the number and nature of the reductions being sought, and the design
such produces, it appears that the site is being overdeveloped.
Response: The proposed project includes a two-story office building and 9 townhomes. The project
will replace a totally impervious site with a dilapidated 6,486 SF office building which is
in disrepair and has been vacant and unattended by Morton Plant Hospital for several
years. The proposed office building will provide for a modern Florida Vernacular
Theme with a very high quality architecture. The office building will increase side yard
and front yard setbacks from what currently exists. The parking and driveway access
will be expanded to current code and provide for proper traffic movement for both this
and an adjoining property. Fire hazards will be effectively removed and accessibility
will be improved. The current drive is non-conforming and 12 feet wide versus 24 feet
proposed. Green space and Landscaping will be lush, verdant and of the highest quality
possible. Overall the office building will expand the regentrification of this area.
The townhomes are going to be developed as 9 units and feature similar design criteria
as the adjoining Townhomes of Harbor Oaks to the north. The units will feature high
quality building materials and functional floor plans. The density will be less than that
afforded the project adjoining north (Townhomes of Harbor Oaks) and will be less than
the density afforded the property on the south side of Magnolia of which both are
allowed 24 units per acre while our density is 12 units per acre. This lower density
townhome offering expands the landscaping and green area capabilities compared to the
adjoining properties and adds a less dense green environ relative to the large asphalt
parking of Morton Plant to the east and the other adjoining properties. Overall, the
project should add approximately $4 to $5 million dollars to the tax rolls versus the
$250, 000 assessment which currently exists and represents a very aesthetically pleasing
project to this evolving rim of the downtown area of Clearwater.
24. General Applicability criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this
development be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of
adjacent properties." f t? _
p TIT i ?
9 2005
PLANP1Ini? 5 uul avcS4
?'` ()F C,C A rift fi
Magnolia Park (FLD20059074)
September 29, 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 11 of 14
Response: See Response # 23 above.
25. General Applicability criteria #5 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this proposal
is "consistent with the community character of the surrounding area."
Response: See Response # 23 above.
26. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide specific
examples of HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards."
Response: See Response # 23 above.
27. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response: Provide specific
examples of HOW this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses."
Response: See Response # 23 above.
28. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response: Provide specific
examples of HOW this proposal will "upgrade the immediate vicinity," especially in light of
all of the reductions and deviations requested.
Response: See Response # 23 above.
29. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response: Provide specific
examples of HOW this proposal "creates a form and function which enhances the
community character of the immediate vicinity" and for "the City of Clearwater as a
whole."
Response: See Response # 23 above.
30. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response: Provide specific
examples of HOW "flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height are
justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole."
Response: See Response # 23 above.
31. Revise the Project Narrative to match the square footage of the office building proposed on
the site plan Sheet 1, as well as the number of parking spaces required/provided for the
office building. Otherwise revise according to the request as outlined by Staff above.
Response: Please see the revised Project Narrative for the Requested Deviations from the Code.
32. Sheet 4A -Either add onto each lot or in a table on the sheet the squar a f t
-
SFR 3 0 265
Magnolia Park (FLD2005074)
September 29, 2005 ORIGINAL
Page 12 of 14
Response: The area of each Lot is depicted on the Preliminary Plat.
33. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That the final design and color of the
building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to, or as modified by, the
CDB;
Response: Acknowledged.
34. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That, prior to the issuance of any
permits, either a Unity of Title or a Final Plat be recorded in the public records;
Response: Acknowledged.
35. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That future signage meet the
requirements of the Code and any future freestanding signs be a m6nument-style sign,
designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
Response: Acknowledged.
36. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That all Parks and Recreation fees be
paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
Response: Acknowledged
37. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That all Fire Department
requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
Response: Acknowledged.
38. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: That all proposed utilities (from the
right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed underground, including outdoor lighting
lines;
Response: Acknowledged.
39. Show the location of electric poles to be retained on-site and/or overhead power and
communication lines for adjacent parcels that will continue to traverse the site to determine
conflicts with proposed improvements, especially parking and landscaping.
Response: The electric poles providing power service to the adjacent properties located north and
south of the project will remain in place with the overhead power lines cross the office
parking lot. No interruption is proposed.
40. Based on the location of the outside condensing units indicated on the south and west
elevations, unclear if this proposed location of the a/c units is limited to that area shown or
if there is additional flat roof for the rest of the building, and potentially on both sides of the
cupola. Unclear as to roof structure, as to what is flat versus pitched. Suggest submitting a
roof plan to assist. Reason for such request is to determine where buildin height will be
measured to and what height will be advertised. D R U U R
u
SEP 3 0, 2005
'PLAN (,^ . L- - 'svC's?'
(U*ryOr ......'.s -!..
Magnolia Park (FLD20050074) 0
September 29, 2005
Page 13 of 14 ORIGINAL
Response: There will be a flat roof area on one side of the cupola with access through the cupola.
Details will be provided on the final plans when submitted for Building Permit.
41. Sheet 4 indicates a two-foot overhang at the rear of the townhomes and indentations where
the a/c units are located. However, based on the elevations submitted, I do not see any two-
foot overhangs (assumed to be outside walls of the second/third floors) nor the indentations
in the locations as indicated on Sheet 4. Clarify and/or coordinate site and building
elevations.
Response: Pleas see the revised architectural Plans attached.
42. Show on Sheet 4 and L-1 the balconies indicated on the elevations, including the distance
from the face of the building to the edge of the balconies.
Response: Revised dimensions have been provided.
43. Building elevations submitted is for the four-unit townhome building. Correct the
elevations according to which direction they face, as the south is actually north, north is
actually south...
Response: Revised Plans have been provided herein.
44. Sheet 4 - show the location of garage doors for all units.
Response: The 16' overhead garage doors are shown on the revised Site Plan and the townhome
plans.
45. It is assumed, since floor plans were not submitted for the townhomes, that the end units
with access to the side of the unit (east or west side of the building) will also have stairs
similar to the interior units shown, but that those stairs are internal to the unit. Advise.
Response: See revised four unit townhome building elevations & floor plans.
46. Rear of townhomes appears as a three-story mass of building, with no indentations or other
features (such as balconies) to break up the solid mass of this side of the building. Of
concern is the southern townhome building, as the rear of this building faces Magnolia
Drive.
Response: See revised four unit townhome building elevation (south) Magnolia Drive.
47. Provide on the building elevations the overall length and depth of the building (for both
buildings). Ensure that these dimensions match that indicated on Sheet 4. Currently, Sheet
4 indicates a building depth of 40 feet with a two-foot overhang, yet the building elevation
scales at 42 feet on the ground level. Sheet 4 also indicates a building length of 100.67 feet,
whereas the elevation for the four-unit townhome building scales to 99.5 feet in length.
Response: See dimensions of buildings on 1/8"Site Plan Sheet. D
E40 3 0 2005
FS
PLANNING& Davy ? FrCS
Magnolia Park (FLD20050074)
September 29, 2005 NiGINAL
Page 14 of 14
48. Proposed garage doors for the townhomes - Do the door lift vertically or do they pivot,
opening over the adjacent sidewalk. If the latter, this would appear to be a problem for
pedestrians walking adjacent to an opening garage door that would hit them. Advise.
Response: All garage doors shall be roll-up overhead doors and will not extend out over the
driveways.
To supplement our responses, we have attached the following documents for your review:
• (15) Copies of Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Project)
• (15) Copies of Owners Letter of Authorization
• (15) Copies of Site & Landscape Plans (8.5 x 11 copy)
• (15) Copies of Building Elevations & Floor Plans (8.5 x 11)
• (15) Copies of Property Deed(s)
• (15) Copies Property Appraiser Record Card
• (15) Copies of Project Narrative
• (15) Copies of ITE Trip Generation Analysis
• (15) Copies of Stormwater Design Narrative, Drainage Calculations & Underdrain Analysis
• (15) Copies of an Application for Plat Approval
• (15) Comprehensive Landscape Application
• (15) Copies of Signed & Sealed Survey (in Civil Plans)
• (15) Copies of 24" x 36" Office Floor Plan
• (15) Sets of 24" x 36" Building Elevation Plans
• (15) Sets of 24" x 36" Revised Civil/Site Plans
Please give us a call if you have any questions or comments regarding the above referenced material.
Sincerely,
LA Civil
Scott Lin
President
Cc: Andrew Hupp, Magnolia Park Realty, LLC
File: 081-006.200
D f io
F"I
S_. 3 9 2005
'LANNI
NG& DC-Vt_,.:: [ -'VCS'
CATY OF CL
0 • Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:39 AM
To: 'Scott Lincoln'
Subject: RE: Magnolia Park
You got it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:37 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Magnolia Park
Wayne:
Can you email me your final conditions/comments in word format so I can have a head start on the
comment/response letter preparation. I have the draft you sent but I think you tweeked it a little before
DRC and Scott Rice changed a comment.
Thanks,
Scott
9/7/2005
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:50 PM
To: 'Scott Lincoln'
Subject: RE: Draft 9.1.05 DRC comments for'907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
1. The "xx" in the request is to be filled in once there are distinct numbers provided by
you. I am looking for the setback in that/those particular locations.
2. Based on all the comments from all reviewing departments, the decision is that the
application is insufficient to move forward to the CDB. As such, the note at the end
gives you a date to resubmit a revised application to go back to DRC, prior to being
scheduled (if found sufficient to move forward) for the CDB. The new potential CDB date,
based on resubmitting the revised application and going to the November 3, 2005, DRC
meeting (and being found sufficient) would be December 20, 2005.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Lincoln [mailto:slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 2:20 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: RE: Draft 9.1.05 DRC comments for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Wayne:
1. I noticed you have XX for proposed setbacks, etc. Do you need info
from me?
2. The last statement in your report says to resubmit by 9/30/05 for
11/05/05 DRC...Can you clarify?? DRC is 9/1 correct?? And resub is 9/8
for 11/1 CDB correct?
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 6:33 PM
To: Scott Lincoln
Subject: Draft 9.1.05 DRC comments for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced case for
the September 1, 2005, DRC meeting, to be held at 2:00 pm.
Wayne
<<draft 9.1.05 dre action agenda.pdf>>
1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 6:33 PM
To: Scott Lincoln (E-mail)
Subject: Draft 9.1.05 DRC comments for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached are the Draft DRC comments for the above referenced case for the September 1, 2005, DRC meeting, to be held
at 2:00 pm.
Wayne
draft 9.1.05 dre
action agenda...
Wells, Wayne
From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 8:51 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: RE: FLD2005-07074, 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Thanks Wayne ...see you at DRC. Also, I have a project with John
Schodtler (DC Customs) as well. Can you and John try to get me on the
DRC schedule with meetings one meeting times apart rather than back to
back, As I need to speak with each client afterward and back to back is
hard to-do.
Scott
--_---Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com (mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 14,
To: Scott Lincoln
Subject: FLD2005-07074,
Scott -
2005 6:30 PM
907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project.
The original is being mailed.
Wayne
<<letter of completeness 8.14.05.pdf>>
1
LL CITY OF CLEWRWATER
o Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
0 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM
August 14, 2005
Scott Lincoln
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, F133756
RE: FLD2005-07074 -- 907 S FT HARRISON AVE -- Letter of Completeness
Dear Scott Lincoln :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-07074. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Complete.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on
September 01, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor
of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in
downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no
earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be
reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the
DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the
time of the meeting.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or
Wayne.Wells@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
Wayn ells, AICP
Planner III
Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07074 - 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
•
•
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 6:30 PM
To: 'slincoln@lacivil.com'
Subject: FLD2005-07074, 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached is the Letter of Completeness for the above referenced project. The original is being mailed.
Wayne
'x1,
letter of
,mpleteness 8.14.05
•
August 10, 2005
•
/V/L
Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc.
Wayne Wells, Senior Planner
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 S. Myrtle Ave.
Clearwater, FL 33756
Re: Letter of Incompleteness FLD2005-07074
Magnolia & Ft. Harrison
LA Civil Project No.: 081-006.200
Dear Mr. Wells:
Please see a list of comments and our responses below. For your convenience the comments are
in bold print and our responses in italics.
1. Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of
C 5,eE? the following):
tw?rn pt?5 > ? Stormwater plan as noted above is included
AIVACtW0 Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At
------- =Zar- a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided.
Response: We have attached fifteen (15) copies of page 4 of 7 the application with the
applicant's signature/initials accepting the "inclusion " of a stormwater plan
with the application.
2. Provide a Parking Demand Study in conjunction with a request to make deviations
to the parking standards (i.e. reduce number of spaces). There is a reduction
proposed for the offices from four spaces to 3.24 spaces per 1,000 square feet of
Gross Floor Area. Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such
study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be
in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study
will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are
approved.
Response: The outer wall footprint of the proposed office building is 6,174 SF. However,
the gross floor area (GFA) calculation (per Code) allows for discounting 522 SF
of stairwells and elevator areas, which results in 5,652 SF of GFA for parking
requirements. Hence, based on four (4) spaces11000 SF of GFA, the required
parking is 22 spaces. A total of twenty-four (24) office parking spaces are
provided, and will be utilized by the townhomes as "guest parking" during non-
peak business hours, non-business hours, holidays and weekends.
3. If it is the intent to sell the town, homes on a fee simple basis on their own lot, then a
1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com
Magnolia & Ft. Harrison. •
Wayne Wells
August 9, 2005
Page 2 of 4
Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Plat application must be submitted at this time.
Response: A Preliminary Plat is provided in the revised plan set as Sheet 4A. A Preliminary
Plat Application is also attached for your review.
4. Pavement is a structure under our Code. Provide the dimensions to pavement from
the property lines. Also, provide the dimension to the closest point of the office
building to the front property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Response: Dimensions to proposed pavement (i. e. parking, sidewalk, etc) have been added
to the Site Plan as requested. In addition, the office-building front has
dimensioned to the property line as requested.
5. Provide all required setbacks on Sheet 1 (Front along South Ft. Harrison Avenue:
25 feet; Front along Magnolia Drive: 35 feet; Side in the Commercial District: 10
feet; Side in the Office District: 20 feet; No rear in either District for this project -
corner lot).
Response: The above setbacks, as required in the subject "C" and "O" districts have been
added to the Site Data, adjacent to the actual setbacks planned to each proposed
structure.
6. Show on the civil plans all required sight triangles.
Response: The required 20' site triangles have been added to each side of the proposed
driveways, on the Site Plan, similar to those depicted on the Landscape Plan.
7. One loading space is required to be provided for the offices (12 feet wide by 35 feet
long).
Response: Since the office building will actually be 5,652 SF "GFA ", and is less than 6000
SF GFA, no loading zone is required
8. Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped
areas.
Response: Sheet 4B of the plans depicts the shaded interior green areas totaling 1,467 SF
which is 10.6 % of the 13,850 SF of proposed vehicular use area (WA).
9. Show the location of outside mechanical equipment for the office building and all
required screening.
Response: The mechanical equipment for the office building will be roof mounted in the
proposed cupola structure.
10. Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
Response: Site lighting will be provided via light poles strategically located as shown on the
revised Site Plan, to minimize offsite glare and light trespass.
Magnolia & Ft. Harrison. •
Wayne Wells
August 9, 2005
Page 3 of 4
11. In the Site Data on Sheet 1, provide the lot area and acreage in the Commercial
District and the Office District, with a total square footage and acreage.
Response: These areas have been added to the Site Data and are also located on the Site
Plan as part of the FAR Calculation and Density Calculation.
12. Provide the proposed Floor Area Ratio in the Commercial District.
Response: Please see the Site Plan and Site Data for FAR and Density Calculations based
on the "C" and "O"District requirements and the proposed pro-rata-share
occupation of the office of townhomes.
13. It appears that both the offices and town homes are designed with a pitched roof.
Provide the proposed building height for both the office building and the town
homes from grade to the midpoint of the roof on the elevations and in the Site Data
on Sheet 1. Also provide the height of the cupola from the roof midpoint for the
office building.
Response: The proposed building roof midpoint heights are as follows:
Office building = 25'-9"
Office Cupola = 35'-9"
Townhomes = 37'-5"
14. Delineate/indicate the required landscape buffers for this property on Sheet 1:
Along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue: 15 feet; Along Magnolia Drive: 10 feet; Along the
south and west sides adjacent to the office use at the corner of S. Ft. Harrison
Avenue and Magnolia Drive: five feet; Along the north side (office to office) in the
Commercial District: five feet; Along the north side (multifamily to multifamily): 10
feet; and Along the east side: 10 feet.
Response: The landscape buffers have been added to the Site Data in a tabular format. The
buffers are also delineated on the interior green plan.
15. Wheel stops are required for all parking spaces not in garages or under the office
building.
Response: Wheel Stops have been added to the above referenced parking spaces as
requested.
16. Indicate on Sheet 3 and Sheet L-1 all trees proposed to be removed.
Response: All existing trees are shown on Sheet 3 and L-1. An `X" indicates that the tree is
to be removed.
17. Indicate the driplines of all existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the
site that are being preserved.
Response: All existing trees are shown on Sheet 3 and L-1. An "X" indicates that the tree is
Magnolia & Ft. Harrison. •
Wayne Wells
August 9, 2005
Page 4 of 4
to be removed,
18. Interior landscaping required is 10 percent of the vehicular use area (VUA). Provide
the required and provided square footage and percentage of the VUA in the site
data on Sheet.
Response: A note has been added to the site data beneath the lot coverage calculations
indicating that 1, 467 SF of interior green area is provided for 13,850 SF of VUA.
This equates to 10.6% of the proposed VUA, which is greater than the 10%
required by code.
19. Provide irrigation notes on Sheet L-1.
Response: Irrigation notes have been added to the landscape plan as requested.
20. Since there are reductions to required landscape buffers and potentially interior
landscape requirements, must submit a completed Comprehensive Landscape
Program Application, listing all requirements to be waived or modified, with all
justification for such reductions.
Response: Please see the attached Comprehensive Landscape Application for your review.
21. Provide larger scale elevation drawings, as the 8.5"x11" drawings submitted are too
small to read (prefer 24"06"). Include on the drawings the colors and materials of
the exterior facades.
Response: The 24"x 36" exterior elevation drawings are provided herein as requested.
To supplement our responses, we have attached the following items:
• One (1) Original & (14) copies of page 4 of 7 of Flexible Development Application
(Stormwater Plan initialed by applicant)
• One (1) Original & (14) copies of an Application for Plat Approval
• One (1) Comprehensive Landscape Application (original)
• One (1) Comprehensive Landscape Application (copy with Site and Landscape Plan)
• Fifteen (15) Copies of 24" x 36" Office Floor Plan
• Fifteen (15) Sets of 24" x 36" Building Elevation Plans
• Fifteen (15) Sets of 24" x 36" Revised Site Plans
If you have any questions or comments regarding the above referenced material, please give me a
call.
Sincerely,
LA Civil
Scott Lincc
President
CC: Andrew Hupp, Hupp Realty Advisors, LLC
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:51 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Andrew Hupp
Subject: RE: FLD2005-0704, 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Wayne
1. Can we get a few more days to get this info on the Plans. Tomorrow
at 4 PM is to tight.
2. Why do we need a parking study? Can my client explain the proposed
office uses and demonstrate no addition parking needs?
3. Why do we need a loading zone for office?
4. Can we get some additional time on the Preliminary Plat?
We need to stay on this CDB cycle if at all possible. Let me know how
we can assure this.
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 9:27 AM
To: Scott Lincoln
Subject: FLD2005-0704, 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached is the Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced
project. The original will be mailed. I will fax this letter also.
Wayne
<<letter of incompleteness 8.8.05.pdf>>
1
•
Clearwater
August 08, 2005
Scott Lincoln
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, Fl 33756
10
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W. MYCLEARWATER. COM
RE: FLD2005-07074 -- 907 S FT HARRISON AVE -- Letter of Incompleteness
Dear Scott Lincoln :
The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the
case number: FLD2005-07074. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has
determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments.
11. Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the
following):
Stormwater plan as noted above is included
Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a
minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided.
J 2. Provide a Parking Demand Study in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the
parking standards (ie. reduce number of spaces). There is a reduction proposed for the offices
from four spaces to 3.24 spaces per 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area. Prior to the
submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the
Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic
engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not
deviations to the parking standards are approved
13. If it is the intent to sell the townhomes on a fee simple basis on their own lot, then a
Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Plat application must be submitted at this time.
J 4. Pavement is a structure under our Code. Provide the dimensions to pavement from the
property lines.
Also, provide the dimension to the closest point of the office building to the front property line
along South Ft. Harrison Avenue.
5. Provide all required setbacks on Sheet 1 (Front along South Ft. Harrison Avenue: 25 feet;
Front along Magnolia Drive: 35 feet; Side in the Commercial District: 10 feet; Side in the
Office District: 20 feet; No rear in either District for this project - corner lot).
6. Show on the civil plans all required sight triangles.
7. One loading space is required to be provided for the offices (12 feet wide by 35 feet long).
J 8. Depict by shading or crosshatching all required parking lot interior landscaped areas.
9. Show the location of outside mechanical equipment for the office building and all required
screening.
J 10. Show or indicate the location of all outdoor lighting fixtures.
Ill. In the Site Data on Sheet 1, provide the lot area and acreage in the Commercial District and the
Office District, with a total square footage and acreage.
Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07074 - 907 S FT HARRISONAVE
CITY OF CLEARWATER
Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576
W W W.MYCLEARWATER.COM
August 08, 2005
J12. Provide the proposed Floor Area Ratio in the Commercial District.
J 13. It appears that both the offices and townhomes are designed with a pitched roof. Provide the
proposed building height for both the office building and the townhomes from grade to the
midpoint of the roof on the elevations and in the Site Data on Sheet 1. Also provide the hieght
of the cupola from the roof midpoint for the office building.
J 14. Delineate/indicate the required landscape buffers for this property on Sheet 1:
Along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue: 15 feet;
Along Magnolia Drive: 10 feet;
Along the south and west sides adjacent to the office use at the corner of S. Ft. Harrison
Avenue and Magnolia Drive: five feet;
Along the north side (office to office) in the Commercial District: five feet;
Along the north side (multifamily to multifamily): 10 feet; and
Along the east side: 10 feet.
15. Wheel stops are required for all parking spaces not in garages or under the office building.
16' Indicate on Sheet 3 and Sheet L-1 all trees proposed to be removed.
17. Indicate the driplines of all existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site that are
being preserved.
18. Interior landscaping required is 10 percent of the vehicular use area (VUA). Provide the
required and provided square footage and percentage of the VUA in the site data on Sheet 1.
19. Provide irrigation notes on Sheet L-1.
1 20. Since there are reductions to required landscape buffers and potentially interior landscape
requirements, must submit a completed Comprehensive Landscape Program application,
listing all requirements to be waived or modified, with all justification for such reductions.
21. Provide larger scale elevation drawings, as the 8.5 "x 11 " drawings submitted are too small to
read (prefer 24"06"). Include on the drawings the colors and materials of the exterior facades.
Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed
incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development
review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed,
complete. Please resubmit by 4:00 pm on Tuesday, August 9, 2005.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4504 or
Wayne. Wells@myclearwater.com.
Sincerely yours,
"..L n - "
Wavne Wells
Planner III
Letter of Incompleteness - FLD2005-07074 - 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
FAX COVER MEMO
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
100 S. MYRTLE AVE.
CLEARWATER, FL 33756
(727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865
TO: SG64 4nta c () /
FAX:
Phone: 1-¢t9 - goo b
FROM: e / IJ? Phone:
(p
/JoD Z
1 RE: ,?L--l> 'Z-o o r-D 7 P-74-
DATE:_
I'D 7 &. FY. h-rr? sw o-.
MESSAGE:
NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE)_,,,?_
Aug. 08 2005 09:44AM
YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept
YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865
NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT
01 94469050 Aug.08 09:42AM 01'22 SND 03 OK
TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04.
THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'.
FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329).
W, 0 0
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 9:27 AM
To: 'slincoln@LACivil.com'
Subject: FLD2005-0704, 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached is the Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced project. The original will be
mailed. I will fax this letter also.
Wayne
letter of
completeness 8.8.0.
?C?arl?s d7o r7q
`/V/L
Lincoln Allen Civil Engineering Group, Inc.
July 26, 2005 ,
i
4
Wayne Wells, AICP AL
City of Clearwater Planning Department
100 Myrtle Avenue
Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748
RE: MAGNOLIA PARK @ 907 SOUTH FORT HARRISON AVE.
Case Number/Address: (to be assigned) / 907 South Fort Harrison Ave
Applicant: Magnolia Park Realty, LLC (contact: Andrew Hupp)
635 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 33756
TELEPHONE: 727-210-1900
FAX: 727-210-1901
Engineer's E-MAIL: slincoln@LACivil.com
Dear Mr. Wells:
We have attached the following items to supplement a Flexible Development Application for this project to be
reviewed as a Comprehensive Infill Project:
• (1) Check for $1,205 (Application Fee)
• (1) Copy of Owners Letter of Authorization
• (1) Original Flexible Development Application (Comprehensive Infill Project)
• (1) Copy of Property Deed(s)
• (1) Copy Property Appraiser Record Card
• (1) Copy of Project Narrative
• (1) ITE Trip Generation Analysis
• (1) Copy of Stormwater Design Narrative, Drainage Calculations & Underdrain Analysis
• (1) Copy of Signed & Sealed Survey
• (1) Signed & Sealed Set of Site & Landscape Plan Sets (w/ (1) 8.5 x 11 copy)
• (1) Copy of Building & Sign Elevations (w/ (1) 8.5 x 11 copy)
• (14) Copies/Packages (including all of the above documents)
Please contact our office if you have any further questions regarding the project. We look forward to your
completeness approval followed review of the project before the DRC on September 1, 2005 and the City of
Clearwater CDB on October 18, 2005.
Sincerely,
LA Civil
Scott Lin,
President
Cc: Andrew Hupp Magnolia Park Realty, LLC
Y
JUL 2 82006
1446 Court Street • Clearwater, FL 33756
Ph: (727) 446-9000 • Fax: (727) 446-9050 • E-Mail: SLincoln@LACivil.com • E-Mail: SAllen@LACivil.com
•
MEMORANDUM
t
TO: Community Development Board members, /
FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III WM W
DATE: December 19, 2005
RE: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027, 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
After discussion with the applicant's representative regarding acceptance of the proposed
conditions recommended by Staff for the above referenced case on your December 20,
2005, agenda, the applicant's representative has recommended the following condition be
modified (new language underlined):
9. That a cross access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected
properties, located as an extension of the north/south drive aisle east of the office
building be recorded, upon request of the Planning Department, with the property
to the south as feasible and agreed to by both property owners;
Staff has no objection to the modified language. This case has been shown on the
Consent portion of your agenda. The above modification should not remove it from the
Consent section.
le 0 Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 8:09 AM
To: 'Nick Fri'
Subject: RE: 907 S Ft Harrison
Nick -
Don't know which Walgreen you are referring to, but if it is the one at Cleveland and Myrtle, it is zoned Downtown,
which does not have any required setbacks or perimeter buffering. This is also true with the Publix on S. Ft.
Harrison, as it is also zoned Downtown and the City wanted the building up close to S. Ft. Harrison. The
landscaping you see is the required foundation landscaping. Different zoning districts between the subject
property at 907 S. Ft. Harrison and the Publix and Walgreens (different rules).
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Fri [mailto:natbeach@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:57 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: Re: 907 S Ft Harrison
Thanks Wayne, it does. My only quibble (minor concern) is the absence of perimeter landscaping, since
the city is working hard to see the re-dev of Ft. H. be somewhat a show piece. I wasn't too happy with the
Walgreen distance and landscaping by Publix. You need not reply, I'm opining. Nick
12/19/2005
9 0 Page 1 of 1
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 7:48 AM
To: 'Nick Fri'
Subject: RE: 907 S Ft Harrison
Nick -
This site is an odd-shaped site. The front setback to the building from S. Ft. Harrison Avenue is 10 feet. Findings
of Fact #7 is dealing with the parking lot to the east of the proposed building. The lot is narrow in a north/south
orientation with only 62 feet, which is the required parking dimension amount for a 19-foot parking space, a 24-
foot drive aisle and a 19-foot parking space, which produces a zero side setback to pavement, which is what
Finding of Fact #7 is talking about. I had concerns regarding the lack of ability of perimeter buffering, but felt that
the introduction of interior landscaping (which none presently exists) mitigates the lack of perimeter buffering,
which is hampered due to the narrow north/south lot dimension. Finding of Fact #6 is talking about the existing
character of front setbacks to buildings along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue (albeit without stating the proposed setback
of 10 feet is consistent with the existing character). The request is long due to the odd shape of the property and
the proposed site design. Hope this helps.
Wayne
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Fri [mailto:natbeach@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 4:50 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Subject: 907 S Ft Harrison
Sorting thru the set back confusion:
The Compliance Table and the narrative indicate a 10 ft to bldg set back along Ft H
The Findings of Fact item 7. and the site plan indicate a Zero s/b
Help make sense of this. Thanks Nick
12/19/2005
0 0 ORIGINAL
CDB Meeting Date: December 20, 2005
Case Numbers: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027
Agenda Item: F9
Owners: Magnolia Park Realty, LLC and BKB Properties, Inc.
Applicant: Magnolia Park Realty, LLC
Representative: Mr. Scott Lincoln PE or Mr. Steve Allen PE LA Civil Inc.
Address: 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
CITY OF CLEARWATER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
GENERAL INFORMATION:
REQUEST: (1) Flexible Development to permit a Mixed Use of offices (5,250
square feet) and nine attached dwellings in the Commercial and
Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the
Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to the
front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 10
feet (to building), reductions to the front (south) setback in the
Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35
feet to 16.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north)
setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to
pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office
District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), reductions to the side
(south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to seven feet
(to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10
feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (east) setback
in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (south) setback in the Office District from 20
feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) in the
Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to
the side (east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet
(to building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet
to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in
the Commercial District from 25 feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an
increase to building height for townhomes in the Office District
from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to permit
buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.C
and 2-1004.13, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west
property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10
feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south
property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 1 of 12
0 9
building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north
property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet
(to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north
property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 8.02 feet (to
building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south
property line in the Commercial and Office Districts from five feet
to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along
the east property line in the Commercial District from five feet to
zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the
west property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to
pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the east
property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to
building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to
4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program,
under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat
approval for a 10-lot subdivision.
EXISTING ZONING/ Commercial (C) and Office (O) Districts; Commercial General (CG)
LAND USE: and Residential/Office General (R/OG) Categories
PROPERTY SIZE: 0.827 acres; 36,040 square feet
PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Office (6,486 square feet)
Proposed Use: Mixed-use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine
attached dwellings
ADJACENT ZONING/ North: Commercial and Office Districts; Office and attached
LAND USES: dwellings (Harbor Oaks townhomes)
East: Office District; Vacant
South: Commercial and Office Districts; Office and vacant
West: Office District; Offices
CHARACTER OF THE
IMMEDIATE VICINITY: The surrounding area is developed with office uses and attached
dwellings.
ANALYSIS:
Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.827 acres is located on the east side of South Ft.
Harrison Avenue approximately 50 feet north of Magnolia Drive and on the north side of
Magnolia Drive approximately 200 feet east of South Ft. Harrison Avenue. The site has 79.5 feet
of lot width along S. Ft. Harrison Ave. and 160.94 feet of lot width along Magnolia Drive and is
currently developed with a one-story office building oriented toward S. Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 2 of 12
The area along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue between Druid Road and Jeffords Street is a mixture of
commercial, office and attached dwelling uses. The property to the south on the north side of
Magnolia Drive is presently developed with office building located at a zero front setback to S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue, with the eastern portion of that property entirely a parking area. The property to
the south across Magnolia Drive is presently vacant, but a proposal has been recently filed with the
Planning Department to develop it with a mixed-use project. The property to the east is presently
vacant, and is part of the property to the south across Magnolia Drive. Property farther east is
developed with the Pinellas Trail and an office complex. The property to the west across S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue is presently developed with offices. The property to the north fronting on S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue is presently developed with an office and shares driveway access with the subject
property. The property to the north toward the rear is presently being developed with the Harbor
Oaks townhomes (45 attached dwellings).
Proposal: The proposal includes a mixed-use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached
dwellings. Through a mixed-use calculation involving the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and maximum
density for both the Commercial and Office Districts, the proposal maximizes the development
potential for the subject property. The proposed office building will be a two-story building of a
total of 5,250 square feet of Gross Floor Area (GFA). The townhomes will be three stories in
height, with a four-unit building fronting on Magnolia Drive and a five-unit building along the
north property line, adjacent to the Harbor Oaks townhome project. The townhome units will be
approximately 2,425 square feet of floor area each.
The proposal for this mixed-use project includes a reduction to the minimum lot width in the
Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. Office uses and
many commercial uses in the Commercial District require a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The
applicant has attempted to purchase the office properties to the north and south, to combine with
the subject property, but has been unsuccessful. The requested reduction does not produce a lot
out of character with the surrounding neighborhood. The flexibility requested regarding lot width
is justified by the benefits to the community character of the immediate vicinity by providing an
upgraded building and site design.
The proposal includes a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25
feet to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office District from 35
feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to 16.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side
(north) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to
the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), reductions to
the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), from
10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the
side (east) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction
to the side (south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement) and
reductions to the side (east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building),
from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk). The property is
irregularly shaped, with a narrow lot width at points of the site. It is due to this irregular shape,
and the proposed site design, that the request includes the numerous setback and landscape buffer
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 3 of 12
0 0
reductions. The proposed two-story office building basically replaces the existing one-story office
building in the same location in regard to the front setback to the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue property
line. The character of development (commercial, office and attached dwelling uses) along this
stretch of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue is with buildings between a zero to 10-foot front setback. The
proposed office building location increases the south side setback over that existing adjacent to the
office building at 909 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue and increases the north side setback over that
existing adjacent to the office building at 905 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue with the widened driveway.
The site design for the office building produces a corner of the office building within the sight
visibility triangle for the driveway on S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. This driveway is being doubled in
size over that existing. Due to the widening of the driveway and the small building encroachment
into the sight visibility triangle, it was determined the encroachment maintains a safe exiting
circumstance for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Due to the width of the lot east of the proposed
office building, where the existing conditions are with a zero-foot side setback to pavement, and
the dimensional requirements for parking lots, the proposal includes a zero-foot side setback on
the north and south sides of the parking lot. This is not the ideal situation, but the requested
flexibility is necessary for this proposal. The applicant has introduced interior landscaping areas
into the parking lot at the required 10 percent of the vehicular use area, breaking up the parking lot
and instituting areas for trees and other landscaping. The conditions for the existing parking lot
has pavement at a zero-foot front setback along Magnolia Drive and a zero-foot side (west)
setback adjacent to the parking lot for the office building at 909 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. The
proposal includes maintaining the zero-foot side (west) setback to the parking lot for the office
building at 909 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, but increases the front setback to 16.3 feet to pavement
adjacent to Magnolia Drive. In order to provide townhome units of adequate size, meet the
dimensional requirements for parking areas, maintain safe exiting from the individual garages for
the townhomes and deal with the lot depth from Magnolia Drive, the proposal includes a front
setback reduction to the townhome building adjacent to Magnolia Drive to 8.4 feet and to the side
(north) setback of eight feet. While this rear area of the site has been only a parking lot, the
proposed setback to Magnolia Drive is consistent and compatible with the front setbacks for the
offices farther east on Magnolia Drive, the office building at 909 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue and the
townhomes recently constructed to the north (Harbor Oaks). The site design for the townhomes
and the driveway on Magnolia Drive produces a corner of the townhome building within the sight
visibility triangle. Magnolia Drive is not a through roadway, ending at the office complex to the
east of this site. Due to the minimal traffic on this roadway and the small building encroachment
into the sight visibility triangle, it was determined the encroachment maintains a safe circumstance
for vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The proposal includes a reduction to the side setback to the
proposed buildings, pavement and sidewalks along the east side of the property. There is a vacant
lot to the east of the subject property, which is part of the property to the south across Magnolia
Drive. The proposed setbacks are consistent and compatible with those approved for the Harbor
Oaks townhome project to the north, where those townhomes were approved 7.5 feet from this
project's north property line and 5.5 feet from the east property line.
The proposal includes an increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from
25 feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office District
from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof). The proposed office building appears to have a
pitched roof, but actually has a flat portion to which the height is measured. The center roofed
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 4 of 12
0 0
portion of the office building houses the elevator equipment, and is permitted to extend higher
than the requested building height. The proposed townhome height is consistent and compatible
with that approved for the Harbor Oaks townhome project to the north at 36.6 feet.
The Florida vernacular-style of architecture for both the office and townhome buildings will
include soft yellow stucco for the base of the buildings, a light green beveled siding for the second
and third floors, accented by a darker shade of green for shutters and other architectural features.
The roof material will be standing seam metal.
The proposal includes providing the required 21 parking spaces for the office building and
providing two garage parking spaces for each townhome unit. The office parking spaces will be
shared with the townhomes (after hours) as guest parking. The proposal includes increasing the
width of the driveway from S. Ft. Harrison Avenue from the existing 12-foot width to the required
24-foot width, increasing the accessibility and safety for this access. The proposed site design also
increases the accessibility to and from the rear parking lot for the office property to the north at
905 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. A driveway is also proposed on Magnolia Drive, providing a more
direct and closer access for the proposed townhomes. The site plan will need to be revised prior to
the issuance of any permits to show this driveway on Magnolia Drive with a 30-foot radius for Fire
Department apparatus. The site plan indicates the proposed installation of a sidewalk along the lot
frontage for the office building at 909 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. Code requirements do not require
the installation of sidewalks beyond the subject property, and due to the existence of parking
spaces for this adjacent office building, the City cannot authorize this sidewalk construction.
Since the shared driveway with the property to the north is being widened with this proposal, a
cross access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected properties, will need to be
recorded and submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any permits. To
promote cross access between properties in an effort to reduce the number of driveways, a cross
access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected properties, located as an extension
of the north/south drive aisle east of the office building should be recorded, upon request of the
Planning Department, with the property to the south.
The proposal includes a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line along South
Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along
the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a reduction to
the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero
feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office
District from 10 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south
property line in the Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Commercial District from five
feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line in
the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer
along the east property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 10 feet
to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk). These reductions parallel to a
great degree the setback reductions requested and are compatible and consistent with the
reductions approved for the Harbor Oaks townhomes to the north. The project will be adequately
landscaped. The landscape plan utilizes a colorful groundcover (parson's juniper, aztec grass and
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005 •
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 5 of 12
0 0
confederate jasmine), shrubs (hibiscus, burford holly, podocarpus Indian hawthorn and viburnam)
and trees (dahoon holly, crape myrtle, wax myrtle, cabbage palm and elm). The front and most of
the side areas will be heavily planted, which will provide a pleasing appearance for this project.
The landscape plan presently indicates wax myrtle trees to be planted along the east and north
sides of the townhomes. These trees are more spreading than upright trees, are prone to fungus
that reduces its life span and is weak-wooded, allowing its trunks to break easily in high wind
conditions. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the landscape plan needs to be revised to show
these trees to be replaced with trees acceptable to the Planning Department, such as Southern Red
Cedar or Washingtonia palms.
The applicant is indicating a monument-style sign for the office building and no signage for the
townhomes at this time. Due to the character of this area of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue and the front
setback proposed, the monument-style sign should not exceed the permitted height of six feet and
should be designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building. On-site utility
facilities (electric and communication lines) will be required to be placed underground as part of
the site redevelopment, including those for outdoor lighting. To improve the visual aspect of this
area and the properties involved, the existing overhead utility lines traversing this site to feed the
office building at 905 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue should be placed underground, if feasible and
acceptable to adjacent property owners.
The proposal includes subdividing the property to provide for the fee simple sale of the
townhomes and the office building. The parking, retention and landscaped areas will be in a
common area to all lot owners.
All applicable Code requirements and criteria including, but not limited to, General Applicability
criteria (Section 3-913) and Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria (Sections 2-
704.C and 2-1004.B) have been met.
Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this
site.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 6 of 12
COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA: (Sections 2-701.1,2-704,2-1001.1
and 2-1001.4)
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
MAXIMUM 5,250 square feet of office (GFA) and X
DENSITY (24 du per nine dwelling units (a)
acre in Commercial
District and 15 du per
acre in Office District)
(nine dwelling units
maximum
IMPERVIOUS 0.7902 overall X
SURFACE RATIO
(ISR) (0.95 maximum
in Commercial
District and 0.75 in
Office District)
LOT AREA (For 0.827 acres; 36,040 square feet X
mixed use: 5,000 -
10,000 sq. ft min. in
Commercial District
and 3,500 sq. ft. min.
in Office District
LOT WIDTH (For West along S. Ft. Harrison Ave.: 79.5 X*
mixed use: 50-100 feet feet
min. in Commercial South along Magnolia Drive: 160.94
District and 50 feet in feet
Office District)
FRONT SETBACK West: 10 feet (to building) X*
(Commercial: 15-25 South: 8.18 feet (to building); 16.34
feet; Office: 15-35 feet (to pavement)
feet
REAR SETBACK Corner lot (all sides other than fronts X
(Commercial and are side setbacks)
Office: 10-20 feet
SIDE SETBACK Commercial: North: zero feet (to X*
(Commercial: 0-10 pavement); South: seven feet (to
feet; Office: 10-20 building), four feet (to pavement) &
feet) three feet (to sidewalk); East: zero feet
(to pavement)
Office: North: 8.02 feet (to building);
South: zero feet (to pavement); West:
one foot (to pavement); East: 7.3 feet
(to building), 5.4 feet (to pavement) &
4.2 feet to sidewalk
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 7 of 12
0 0
STANDARD PROPOSED CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT
HEIGHT (For mixed Commercial: 31 feet (to flat roof for X*
use: 25-50 feet max. in offices)
Commercial District; Office: 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof
30-80 feet max. in for townhomes)
Office District
PARKING SPACES 21 spaces for offices X
(four spaces per 1,000 two spaces per unit for townhomes
sf GFA for offices; 1.5
spaces per unit for
townhomes) (21
spaces required for
offices; 14 spaces
required for
townhomes
* See discussion under Analysis.
(a) Based on a mixed-use calculation involving the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and maximum density
for the Commercial and Office Districts.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 8 of 12
0 0
COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA (Section 2-704.C and 2-1004.11):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for X
development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use,
intensity and development standards.
2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair
market value of abutting properties.
3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X
otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater.
4. The use or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill X
Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses.
5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a X
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the
immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment X
Project creates a form and function that enhances the community
character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for
development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. .
7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off- X
street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and
the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the
City of Clearwater as a whole.
8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the X
shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to
avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel
proposed for development.
* See discussion under Analysis.
COMPLIANCE WITH GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913):
Consistent Inconsistent
1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X
coverage, density and character of adjacent properties.
2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of X
adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof.
3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons X
residing or working in the neighborhood.
4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X
5. Development is consistent with the community character of the X
immediate vicinity.
6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, X
including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation
impacts on adjacent properties.
* See discussion under Analysis.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 9 of 12
0 0
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject 0.827 acres is zoned both Commercial District and Office District and has 79.5
feet of lot width along S. Ft. Harrison Ave. and 160.94 feet of lot width along Magnolia
Drive;
2. The site is currently developed with a one-story office building oriented toward S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue;
3. The proposal includes constructing a mixed-use project with a 5,250 square-foot (GFA),
two-story office building and nine dwelling units (townhomes);
4. The proposal includes a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District to
79.5 feet along S. Ft. Harrison Avenue;
5. The property is irregularly shaped, with a narrow lot width at points of the site where this
irregular shape, and the proposed site design, produced numerous setback and landscape
buffer reductions as part of the proposal;
6. The character of development (commercial, office and attached dwelling uses) along this
stretch of S. Ft. Harrison Avenue is with buildings between a zero to 10-foot front setback;
7. Due to the width of the lot east of the proposed office building, the proposal includes a
zero-foot side setback on the north and south sides of the parking lot, which is consistent
with existing conditions, however, the proposal includes interior landscaping areas in the
parking lot meeting Code requirements to mitigate pavement setback concerns;
8. The proposed setbacks for the townhomes are consistent and compatible with those
approved for the Harbor Oaks townhome project to the north, the front setbacks for the
offices farther east on Magnolia Drive and the office building at 909 S. Ft. Harrison
Avenue;
9. The proposed office and townhome height is consistent and compatible with that approved
for the Harbor Oaks townhome project to the north;
10. The proposal provides the Code required number of parking spaces;
11. The proposed landscape buffer reductions parallel to a great degree the setback reductions
requested and are compatible and consistent with the reductions approved for the Harbor
Oaks townhomes to the north;
12. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding development; and
13. There are no active code enforcement cases for the parcel.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Staff concludes that the proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project per Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B;
2. Staff further concludes that the proposal is in compliance with the General Applicability
criteria per Section 3-913 and the other standards of the Code; and
3. Based on the above findings and proposed conditions, Staff recommends approval of this
application.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 -Page 10 of 12
0 0
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION:
The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on
September 1 and November 3, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the
(1) Flexible Development application to permit a Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and
nine attached dwellings in the Commercial and Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum
lot width in the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to the front (west)
setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the front
(south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to
16.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from
10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District
from 20 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial
District from 10 feet to seven feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from
10 feet to three feet (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (east) setback in the Commercial District
from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback in the Office
District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) in the Office District
from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback in the Office District
from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 4.2
feet (to sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from 25
feet to 31 feet (to flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office District
from 30 feet to 37.5 feet (to midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the visibility
triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-
704.C and 2-10043, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line along
South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer
along the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from
five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property
line in the Office District from 10 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer
along the south property line in the Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to
pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Commercial
District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the
west property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to pavement) and reductions to
the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to
building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2)
Preliminary Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision, for the site at 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue, with
the following bases and conditions:
Bases for Approval:
1. The proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project per Sections 2-704.C and 2-1004.B.
2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General
Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.
3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other
redevelopment efforts.
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 11 of 12
0 0
Conditions of Approval:
1. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
2. That, prior to the issuance of any permits, a Unity of Title or Final Plat be recorded in the
public records;
3. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground, including those for outdoor lighting. The existing overhead utility lines
traversing this site to feed the office building at 905 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue shall be placed
underground, if feasible and acceptable to adjacent property owners;
4. That the monument-style sign for the office building not exceed six feet in height, be designed
to match the exterior materials and colors of the building and be coordinated with site
landscaping;
5. That the site plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to only show sidewalk
construction for the subject site frontage along Magnolia Drive;
6. That the site plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits showing the driveway on
Magnolia Drive with a 30-foot radius for Fire Department apparatus;
7. That the landscape plan be revised prior to the issuance of any permits to replace the wax myrtle
trees along the east and north sides of the property with trees acceptable to the Planning
Department, such as Southern Red Cedar or Washingtonia palms;
8. That a cross access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected properties, be
recorded and submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any permits;
9. That a cross access easement, binding upon successors in title to the affected properties,
located as an extension of the north/south drive aisle east of the office building be recorded,
upon request of the Planning Department, with the property to the south;
10. That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits; and
11. That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits.
Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: . 1,4,0,4
Wayne V. Wells, AICP, Planner III
ATTACHMENTS:
Location Map
Aerial Map
Zoning Map
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Application
S:Wlanning Departmen6C D BTLEX (FLD) I Pending cases)Up for the next CDBTI Harrison Ave S0907 Magnolia Park Offices & Townhomes
(C +.O) - 12.20.05 CDB - WWIFt Harrison S 0907 Staff Report. doc
Staff Report - Community Development Board - December 20, 2005
Cases FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 - Page 12 of 12
6 0
3 I
?? O®?P0???
SR. 590 - Ll Ll
f?W ST
(?
?? a ??Q? ?g //??////
% :'owl
°?
08????00?0
o?o??
F§E:1 S- R?BO ?€? CLEVELAND Sr
lug IT U ? 9T 11 PARK PIHtCE ST ! a 1 ?? ? ? I ?
PIERCE ST PIERCE Y ST W PIERCE V
o
?Ka
a
Q
Z
? O Z
COURT ST D F] 00
-A
ROS4
BROWNELL ST
? ?? ? ? L
-- 1
COURT IT
R°T? [] ? ??? E ? ?`? ?_? ROGERS ST
33 TURNER ST
PI? PROJECT a PINE Z R? „,
_"SID PINE
PINE Z
SITE
P s < ff
Z
a
y
_ AD= N! DRUID RD £ OPoAO
,YlSMINE El
?
WAY
WAY
1 F1 ?
?
1??
V
?
Z
'61
ATH
?
LOTUS pP
LOTUS = ? PATH LOTUS
6i PATH
K?
L
JEFFORDS ST
??? ?a?a?l
GRAND CENTRAL
?
a
?l= ? ?-.?
faC1CER PINELLAS?
? g H+w.
a ? 3
WATKINs 3 WATKINS TLISKAWOUA
Tu10.;1b
a
DE
COfiHETT ?' ST A ST o
N.BLESDE CR
???
-EVIEW SOUTH Z
O ST O
DOE o {D
D 0 DST
(
qg
l\?\ RAMINGO OR E ST u i
V
\ \ WEST 4 ?W IONGS?EY S
\\\\\\V1Vl
/?
]
Ni8?u
O sT
?
`A, ?
?
N
?
y
QUEEN `-r V
P F OU.N
Location Map
Owner: Magnolia Park Realty, LLC
Case: FLD2005-07074
BKB Properties, Inc. PLT2005-00027
Site: 907 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Property
Size(Acres): 0.827
15/29/15/54450/033/0040
PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0080
16/29/15/00000/440/0120
Atlas Page: 295B
Aerial Ma
Magnolia Park Realty, LLC FLD2005--0707 4
°
Owner, BKB Properties, Inc. Case,
PLT2005--00027
........ ............ _ ...... .....
Site, 99)7 South Ft. Harrison ?!ven?;e Pro ?+a?? 0.827
Size (Acres) :
I5/L7{ 156??".r4450 033 i3040
Pft 15/29/15/54450/033/C)080
16/29/15/00000/440/0120
Atlas Page, 295B
0 0
r I _; _
10`1 1, I I° I I? N
W DRUID RD
a a N ? --?
a
r--- I I--
I I LI 810
--- 812
I 1 "-
r- I
JASMINE WA
n
JIB
1 1 ?
IIM1I
1r
i 1I
"
I
L
-- -
L 90q
I , J
L? `I
I I II 1 - ,
LMDR 1
1 " 1 L_ ___
'p L-4 1 1 1 I , `f ---
° ?--t I ?BQ&-
LOTUS PATH
? ?tlooi
lam- 1 i a N1112
I 1 ------I i ^i
I
?i
I_l
i i t1 1114
I _
1 ,
-sal--- i h -- --
-
----
1 ? I a r--?_ ?
, --- -
I
? I
1 I I
--
I
---?
809
I 811
81 813
_--
_
81
817
N N m D
817
?
? r
81 516 821
`
82 512 54
55 825 I
I I I I
50 829 I I I I I
833 I I I 1
J
501 509 837 I 1
I `? j
1
I 839
513 553
841 I r-----'
j
i
I I l
843
517 549
845 -_-
_
_
I
I
j 8U
521 545
849
---------
851 525 853
j905 I
I 857 ---1
-? --
1 I I I
I I
852
j I
I , 650
I I `--------?
I U) n
1001 von
I
C
I
r------
1055 -r ` I
I 1
I ?
I
Zoning Map
Magnolia Park Realty, LLC FLD2005-07074
Owner. BKB Properties, Inc. Case: PLT2005-00027
Site: 907 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Property 0.827
Size(Acres):
15/29/15/54450/033/0040
PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0080
16/29/15/00000/440/0120
Atlas Page: 295B
0 0
rr r'
I I r r- 1 --- - r------ ? I I
' to €d Hwi?lP gam" ; _j 9 I
F ?
'20mc s ? -"'-
`_ -! -®fric
W
W DRUID RD DRUID RD
N
Q
D N
@
h N
id M
li
l
?-
- O
O
' N
I I I
I
( >jac
e
10 ?u
8 ngs
6 4 2 ,
?/fl¦?$ c es
!1?1?
? F12 ___
I
f„C P
LI
810
-- I 9
11
! __ I--- PHASE 1
HASE II ---
-- I 812 j ---
a?
f`?d?
41
ac dW
r ---
''
#n
ice-
1
m81
eat
ail
+e
a
>e
?
8&
24 23
r---1 ; '--
PH
I I 1 r
Q
e 81
5136
'? 2
11 2
taw
8? ASE VITA
I I
1 1 11 ----
1
I
Q Q $ 882 5732 8235 _-_
i I
JASMINE WAY
ached
833 I
I? I Qfll" es ;
of I Qt--- i J f
. elliu 1 a r----?
I 90? I 5
84 5?3 X54 ?--- I I
hed
` ft 36 Off 1 3
284 52; PF?ABFT/Ilg'----I
Y'! J 42 38 85 5135
ae
1 2
L
I : I -
_ _? r905 1 ---I
-
/
Det
ache
d 71 I
906 L, I
? - --?--
1 Offices PHIS VI
652
' d
tlllin
$
lces67 I 1 6 8
i 41 4
23 1 ? -' --------I
i HASEV ,
650
Q _ ---?
------------------ 0 1--- ! -
MAGNOLIA DR
i
Q a "-110
1 I
efAche dw?llufgg ; 1, 1100 1001
0 1
712- -'
A s I Va an 50
I S
I
1
I r
-
w
j 10 s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A
507
?
del Q
I z 509 3 Parking
' _ 111JI
?
{l i 1- I
ve y
, 1059 r4 --- 6 L_1 7 6
` yp 22 21 20 19 108 77 16 15 14 D
Q -
Q "
I - Offices
Q 6
-- I 5
a
L
,
LOTUS PATH = ------? ?o
e
ac i
f, d
e ----1
rllin s ; 41001
;1102
114 ?
.
r 110
_I I 108 106 'ID4 '?
I --
Or estaiura
1101 --- t i? ' 10 1
I 5 I"
2 r 1 bfffices 1 2 3 4
6 6 A
Parking
I _Z' 5 4 3 Vilcap Ilt) 3 -- -' J ---- jl
lot
81
-- ?I 22 27 20 19 18 17 7
6 6 15
8 1 I - I
Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Magnolia Park Realty, LLC FLD2005-07074
Owner. BKB Properties, Inc. Case: PLT2005-00027
Site: 907 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Property 0.827
Size(Acres):
15/29/15/54450/033/0040
PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0080
16/29/15/00000/440/0120
Atlas Page: 295B
View looking northeast at north side of rear portion
of subject property (Harbor Oaks to north)
r I
q6^F ? L
71
AI
View looking north from Magnolia Drive at
existing ditch on subject property (to be filled)
907 South Ft. Harrison Avenue
FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027
:.??w..
pill
5XIM
_.? ?;;? ? ;?IYI?L?h?'r4V?? fir
?. y
View looking north from Magnolia Drive at
eastern vacant portion of subiect nronerty
View looking west at existing building separation
between subject property and 909 S. Ft. Harrison
Avenue
Page 1 of 3
View looking east from S. Ft. Harrison Avenue at
subject property
View looking east at rear parking lot of subject
property
ill 1 AMk
View looking north at established setback along
S. Ft. Harrison Ave north of subiect nronerty
Id
j, I ids
;w
44
Page 2 of 3
View looking east at office at 905 S. Ft. Harrison
View looking northeast at rear parking lot of 905
S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
View looking east at office at 909 S. Ft. Harrison
Ave. (abutting subject property to the south)
907 South Ft. Harrison Avenue
FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027
View looking southeast at vacant property at
southeast corner of S. Ft. Harrison Ave & Magnoli
Drive
View looking northeast at Harbor Oaks townhome
development north of & abutting subject property
a
P AO Law
View looking northwest at development on west
side of S. Ft Harrison Ave at Jasmine Way
View looking northeast at offices at 505 Magnolia
Drive (east of subject property; Pinellas Trail in center)
907 South Ft. Harrison Avenue
FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027
Page 3 of 3
View looking northwest at offices on northwest
corner of S. Ft Harrison Ave and Magnolia Drive
View looking north from Magnolia Dr. at vacant
lot east of subject property (Pinellas Trail on right)
?*?.f1ppf/?j.,rt
410
'av
Engineering Condition
• •
Conditions Associated With
FLD2005-07074
907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Steve Doherty
10/26/2005 1. A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant. City
cannot authorize this construction.
2. Provide cross acces agreement with property owner to north. 11/9/05 - WILL BE PROVIDED
AT BUILDING PERMIT
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Prior to buildign permit, provide a copy of a recorded cross access agreement with property owner
to north. Cross access agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to these properties.
General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements,
the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water
mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may
be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Fire Condition
Leonard Rickard
Not Met
11/09/2005 Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and Not Met
egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB.
10/18/2005 New plan shows 20' radius on Magnolia and no designation on Ft Harrison
11/9/05 STILL SHOWING 20' RADIUS AT CURB ON MAGNOLIA. WHEN DISCUSSED OVER
PHONE IT WAS AGREED THAT A 30' RADIUS WOULD BE PROVIDED AND THAT THE FDOT
CURB CUT ON FT HARRISON WOULD BE LEFT AS SHOWN.
Landscape
Wayne Wells, AICP
10/26/2005 11/16/05 - WW Not Met
Include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report.
10/26/05 - WW
A monument-type sign is shown on Sheet 4 west of the office building. However, landscaping on
Sheet L-1 has not been coordinated with this proposed sign. Revise Sheet L-1.
Parks & Recs Condition
Debbie Reid
08/18/2005 Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if Not Met
applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that
you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment.
SOLID WASTE CONDITION
William Buzzell
562-4773
562-4327 x3062
727-562-4504
562-4818
562-4930
08/26/2005 That dumpster enclousure needs to be built to City code. Not Met
Allow 12x3 footprint for recycling carts for townhomes or will townhomes be on black barrel/yellow
bin service?
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775
Print Date: 12/14/2005
CaseConditons
Page 1 of 3
FLD2005-07074
907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775
10/25/2005 Accessible route from public sidewalk to building's accessible entrance is not acceptable. Width Not Met
of path is not to Florida Building code ADA Chapter 11 standards. Also accessible route must be
located where a user is not compelled to walk or wheel behind a parked vehicle. 11/9/05 - MET
2. Provide proper striping for better flow at the curve to prevent motorists from impeding or
encroaching in opposing lanes. 11/9/05 - NOT MET
3. Remove parking stall inside sight visibility triangle. 11/9/05 - MET
4. Provide wheel stops for parking spaces adjacent to office building. 11/9/05 - MET
5. Provide a detail showing a scaled passenger car backing out of the garage where the
motorist's sight visibility is not obstructed prior to the vehicles bumper entering the roadway.
11/9/05 - MET
6. Provide ramps with truncated domes per FDOT roadway design standards for driveway on
Magnolia Drive.11/9/05 - MET
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Prior to Building Permit:
1. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule.
2. Obtain FDOT permit for work within the state road right-of-way.
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
08/25/2005 11/16/05 - WW Not Met
Potentially include as a condition of approval in the Staff Report.
10/26/05 - WW
Since Harbor Oaks is removing the power lines related to their project and the power line to the
existing building on this property is being removed, and since the power line that traverses the
subject property north/south will only provide power to the office building to the north, is there any
ability to place this traversing power line underground or install conduit(s) for the future
undergrounding when the office building to the north is redeveloped?
8/25/05 - WW
Code requires underground electric and communication lines on-site.
08/26/2005 Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met
That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
08/26/2005 Potential condition to be included in Staff Report: Not Met
That a cross-access easement be recorded, upon request of the Planning Department, with the
property to the south.
08/25/2005 11/16/05 - WW Not Met
Comment still applicable. This is a short sidewalk west of the existing/proposed office building,
not the proposed sidewalk along Magnolia Drive south of Dr. Janelli's property.
8/25/05 - WW
Sheet 3 - Remove the sidewalk connector in the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW between the public
sidewalk and the roadway curb.
08/26/2005 Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
08/26/2005 Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
08/26/2005 Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met
That, prior to the issuance of any permits, either a Unity of Title or a Final Plat be recorded in the
public records;
08/26/2005 Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met
CaseConditons
Print Date: 12/14/2005
Page 2 of 3
FLD2005-07074
907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Zoning Condition Wayne Wells, AICP 727-562-4504
That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground, including outdoor lighting lines;
08/26/2005 Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report: Not Met
That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding signs be a
monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
Print Date: 12/14/2005
CaseConditons
Page 3 of 3
•
r?
U
Wells, Wayne
From: Elbo, Bennett
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:32 AM
To: Rice, Scott; Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Doherty, Steve
Subject: RE: FLD2005-07074 - 907 S Ft Harrison
Wayne Wells showed me a revised site plan providing marked yellow stripping in the middle of the curved roadway,
thereby satisfying Traffic Op's. condition.
Bennett Elbo
City of Clearwater
Traffic Operations Division
Phone: (727)562-4775
Fax: (727)562-4755
bennett.elbo@myclearwater.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Rice, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:36 PM
To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett
Subject: FLD2005-07074 - 907 S Ft Harrison
Two conditions were not met in the resubmittal for the subject case:
ENGINEERING
A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant. City cannot
authorize this construction. 11/9/05 - SIDEWALK NOT DELETED
TRAFFIC
Provide proper striping for better flow at the curve to prevent motorists from impeding or encroaching in
opposing lanes. 11/9/05 - NOT MET
D. Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyClearwater.com
•
0
Wells, Wayne
From: Albee, Rick
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 9:32 AM
To: Watkins, Sherry; DRC Members
Subject: RE: Resubmittals for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
Sorry if my delay caused any inconveniences.
475 East Shore- No Issues.
400 Poinsettia- Revised condition to be met at building permit.
400 Jones- Condition met.
201 Brightwater- No Issues.
170 Brightwater- No Issues.
279 Windward- No Issues.
907 Ft Harrison- No Issues.
1091 Eldorado- No Issues.
161 Brightwater- No Issues.
2190 NE Coachman- No Issues.
1559 Union- No Issues.
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:53 PM
To: DRC Members
Subject: Resubmittals for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
DRC Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-10105; 475 East Shore Drive John
2. FLD2005-09096: 400 Poinsettia John
3. FLD2005-09098: 400 Jones Street Robert
4. FLD2005-09102: 201 Brightwater Wayne
5. FLD2005-09101: 170 Brightwater Drive Wayne
6. FLD2005-09093: 279 Windward Passage Wayne
7. FLD2005-07074: 907 S Ft Harrison Wayne
8. FLD2005-09094: 1091 Eldorado Avenue Wayne
9. FLD2005-09095: 161 Brightwater Dr Wayne
10. LUZ2005-09011/ANX2005-09033 2190 NE Coachman Cky
11. LUZ2005-09012/ANX2005-09034 1559 Uni on Street Sharon
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your
review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for
this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met,"
please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Thursday November
10, 2005.
Sherry L Watkins
Planning Department
Administrative Analyst
(727) 562-4582
sherry.zvatkirts@ntycleatzvater.cvrtt
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Kambourolias, Sam
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:51 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: FLD2005-07074
aerial.doc existing.doc FLD Map request location.doc zoning.doc
form.doc
•
0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:40 PM
To: Kambourolias, Sam
Cc: Herman, Jason
Subject: Map Request for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Sam -
Attached is a map request for Case FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027 for the property at 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue. I will
bring over the paperwork. The survey that I will bring over you may keep.
Thanks-
Wayne
n _761
FLD Map request
form.doc
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Rice, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:36 PM
To: Wells, Wayne; Watkins, Sherry
Cc: Doherty, Steve; Elbo, Bennett
Subject: FLD2005-07074 - 907 S Ft Harrison
Two conditions were not met in the resubmittal for the subject case:
ENGINEERING
A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant. City cannot authorize
this construction. 11/9/05 - SIDEWALK NOT DELETED
TRAFFIC
Provide proper striping for better flow at the curve to prevent motorists from impeding or encroaching in
opposing lanes. 11/9/05 - NOT MET
D. Scott Rice
Land DeveL Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyClearwater.com
•
0
'? Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:22 PM
To: Planning
Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
FYI
Sherry L Watkins
Planning Department
Administrative Analyst
(727) 562-4552
sherry.zvatkins@myclearivater.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Reid, Debbie
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:08 PM
To: Watkins, Sherry
Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
Sherry, P&P has no issues with the below cases.
Debbie O
-----Original Message-----
From: Kader, Art
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 8:36 AM
To: Reid, Debbie
Subject: FW: Resubmittals for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
-----Original Message-----
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:53 PM
To: DRC Members
Subject: Resubmittals for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
DRC Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-10105; 475 East Shore Drive John
2. FLD2005-09096: 400 Poinsettia John
3. FLD2005-09098: 400 Jones Street Robert
4. FLD2005-09102: 201 Brightwater Wayne
5. FLD2005-09101: 170 Brightwater Drive Wayne
6. FLD2005-09093: 279 Windward Passage Wayne
7. FLD2005-07074: 907 S Ft Harrison Wayne
8. FLD2005-09094: 1091 Eldorado Avenue Wayne
9. FLD2005-09095: 161 Brightwater Dr Wayne
10. LUZ2005-09011/ANX2005-09033 2190 NE Co achman Cky
11. LUZ2005-09012/ANX2005-09034 1559 Union Street Sharon
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review
(please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in
Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me
via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Thursday November 10, 2005.
Sherry L Watkins
Planning Department
Administrative Analyst
(727) 562-4582
sherry. watkitcs @ntyclearwa ter. corn
0
0
• •
Wells, Wayne
From: Watkins, Sherry
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 3:53 PM
To: DRC Members
Subject: Resubmittals for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
DRC Members,
Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the December 20, 2005, CDB meeting:
1. FLD2005-10105; 475 East Shore Drive John
2. FLD2005-09096: 400 Poinsettia John
3. FLD2005-09098: 400 Jones Street Robert
4. FLD2005-09102: 201 Brightwater Wayne
5. FLD2005-09101: 170 Brightwater Drive Wayne
6. FLD2005-09093: 279 Windward Passage Wayne
7. FLD2005-07074: 907 S Ft Harrison Wayne
8. FLD2005-09094: 1091 Eldorado Avenue Wayne
9. FLD2005-09095: 161 Brightwater Dr Wayne
10. LUZ2005-09011/ANX2005-09033 2190 NE Coachman Cky
11. LUZ2005-09012/ANX2005-09034 1559 Union Street Sharon
I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review
(please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in
Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me
via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 4:00 pm on Thursday November 10, 2005.
Sherry L Watkins
Planning Department
Administrative Analyst
(727) 562-4582
sherry,/. Watkins @rnyclearwater. com
•
Flexible Development Application - Map Request
Planner Name: Wayne Wells
Case Number: FLD2005-07074/PLT2005-00027
Date Requested: November 16, 2005
Date Requested for (date): November 30, 2005
Maps Requested
x? Location Map
x? Aerial Map
x? Zoning Map
x? Existing Surrounding Uses Map
Required Documents to be submitted to Engineerin g
x? Legal Description
x? Survey
x? Map with Proposed Site Highlighted
Map Name
Owner: Magnolia Park Realty, LLC
Case: FLD2005-07074
BKB Properties, Inc. PLT2005-00027
Site: 907 South Ft. Harrison Avenue Property
i Size(Acres): 0.827
15/29/15/54450/033/0040
PIN: 15/29/15/54450/033/0080
16/29/15/00000/440/0120
Atlas Page: 295B
071D 74 10 7 S - r4l M^6 -'A w
286A B $ A EE 1 CITY OF CLEARWATER
OAK BLUFF'S s9 I
p 'D 1 t pit PINEXLA8ro0(rVV FU0W0A
CONDO 102-97 rr +< 4 s, 4 t7 : +,1 fill 11-
we, u . u-447
PRELU E 80 T y R -- ` PREPARED
NI9TRATION
CONDO REPEAT 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 7s, 1 g 6 4 g g [ t 3 PU & NORKS ADNI
to t ttq S NyynRe ANremCkarNsaler, Fl 33766
8- I a 2 7 7 3 12 1 edr Ph: (727)562-4750, I= (727)526-ass
P4 S m
3 ea ii4 1 II 2 3 4 nltp://mr.•deVtlOler-4.cam/My?s,pmtmmb/DUede_aats/engnea/
T', k
IW Rq'iERS TREET 9
JLJL ML, ?. 4 4 qN, 5 9 ROM" gSWEET _ t 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 I Wu+°tmer'
V-11 1 8 I A ® a0? Pudk 1n,ormullon data is turnlmed by the Pty of Clearwater
HAR AKS R a 1 3 2 + 4 3 2 ? , >e 20 1,D en 4 3 $ 1 t Public works AdmIm11tratbn/En91,nwH dntl must De accepted
O
s -s recdelreawoi cglecadiiorl us, t ndnetd atab gala epnoco PwPon PLACE ere 4 3 2 1 ID. to 9 7 6 to s 7 u u 1
CONDO t bee 6 Inlrostmcture Inven,ory. As 0,M, the City of Paarwotar PWA/E
A masse no 11OIant%1S, esafmod or "Iea conamlo the
r occur«y. ratability. a santof or Pm°? ddto fa
or e coy eorwate
14-21$ 7 .? m 1 $ any inv Porn¢Nar use. furthermore, in
TURNER 4 e $ P `g PWA/E osawnn no frobnty ah.t¦-r tLa' ad win the usa
a rni.. of such data.
a ellREEi I3OJE:
HI
mm ad-na 1i a aor g °e ?, 0 R N I! e a @ This, Altos Pape is suDlecl to perkdib Hoopes.
2 edt $ For tnferma ian obmt lotes,l reaalons, Pleose cam PWA/E or
1 1 7 4 2 sm edt Hl 3 4
O 0,0,47 ow xt.e kite.
3 2 1 !I 2
CAMELOT 1 a 0°4 3 ea 4 2 , 2 + am 341 4 < 3 4 & 1- 7 eat 3' 3 4
OAKS 6 oe 2 ADS- 3 2 ea bas ?0e sae 3 6 S 6 6 ' 2 3 4 5 t 2 3 4 5 N
7
m all
don R.T.IAARKLEY A2R 1 eio all 4 1 e? f T s V 6 &I I g 10
4 9 9 7 6 t0 7 6 6 t5 14 t
10-28 rro 9H RE ?u en aka r/r ¦1 7 R NAROLO C7 6 $
eta ea eta 9
0,/m at twt-ti7 2
4
Iss m4 ate 3 etr e%lA e3 rr r3 ero to 9 Y 12B 11 AN NN 9 . $ 6 0 140 200 400 600
9 8 & 814 ?1? yR', I wtcrao asp - a rro 0,4 _ STREET a tw. s0, 1 -
T
_ 4 ILT N 2 a I>tIU 1 10/ SCALE: 1" = 400•
7 ti A 6 >a, e;?1 at 14 t 6
+0,o (R »' toa p roe s r s ( + 2 3 0, 2 1s 4 s t 2 3 4 LEGEND:
c e 6 5 4 3 1 ,
rot
q'4 3tae yds 6 6 EY fag I3g? 10 8 3 2 ' 6 1s,
'rop1 4 A 5 14 3 too r
8- 1 ® 7 10 19 7 10 18 7 6 8 5 14 1 O
31 29 27 is 23 eD zt p n 131 n 9 7I s 3 ;m t? a to 11 g 1 I a 9 I B BLOCK NUMBER
I Ij °
Q .. I I 0,o a 0,o m °'. 3 s, @ >a 0 & tt 474 < 9 z E : e e 3 $ N
boa COULD ROAD WEST $ 0) 1234 LOT ADDRESS
e
CNN I fiw a n 0,0 Cc m 6 boo sot 1 $ f1e , ----- CITY LIMITS LINE
32 30 28 26 24 22 1'g DI 1 2
2
3 SHADED AREA - PROPERTY
20B 1510/6 to `t6 14 12 10 Ca Is, 41 2 we 2 it t0 9 t 2 A t 3 4 5 Ir
bas 3 O DRUHILL OUTSIDE CLEARWATER CITY LIMITS
0 9 B
9 57 55 53 518 to 47 45 43 4t 39 37 3S 33
SZ 63 s+ I 1 1 1 so W 4 6 7 e : 4 23 a fo 9 a) 60, A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX
eoe 5 v 4 E ? am 0,a. 5 PROFESSIONAL
em
S JASSaNE no VL WAY ffi a 9s, 1St CgunR a ? CITY OWNED PROPERTY
C car 66R 164 62 111 60 58 1 56 i 54
A
99 17951 93 1 HA BOR By
a b
19.
? ' 1
528 52A 50148 461 -.J 1
1 4
1
42 , 38 36 34
5 1 1 7S 173 711 89 [
A
oat ' I! MDR ZONING DESIGNATION
Z it to 9 5 1 2 CONDO A 1 2 s m s $"
3 ZONE LINE
86-121
4 6 71 8 1 23 a 10 9 8 7 6
I NAONOIIA DRIVE
N >MMOUA DpryE ? 0,P° 1 oak.
I TT
C 02 100 98 198 9194 92 90 Be
13 117 135 i ' 1 131 t29 12) 125 123
N I 1 66?
q Fm
68
84
82
180
78
178 174 a
72
701
66
12191121A ++P 117 PIS 1A „11 I 'T ,r
roar _ e a a a ,,,
1001
g
$ Q ssn 07/03/W
m set, os/tt/63
2 It 10 p 1
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I3
t ?2 ?3 g 0,
$ S Sw 01/05/95
co seer o1? /6t
1 M A G N 0 L I A a 0, 5 $ ®sse.OSMAIS
too 3
4
9
P
A
R
K ® 0331/6334 t61,5/m
W. e 6 4
22
41
2,
20
19
IS
17
16
15
1
D
C
10
9
8
7
8
. n
a 416 EIPAN90N
m 0,.o a/t1/Dt
5 taro • I
N
y LOTUS PAM
3
°
1 S 0,
1
%
1 ft $ Ib
, a S0, Nw , on 4 c
s
138 136 134 132 130 728 t28 t24 1228 1 22/6 112 118 , 1E 111 t12 t10 106 1081 104 1 t
> 2 3 1 S 6 7 8 2 3 $
"
a s, 0 2 A 8 ; S
IB
1,18
12
5
24m
?IJ
12
21F
2? Nl 1 7
8
t4
16
13
t2
11 „
1
9
8
7
6
1 5
4
s 1 rme 3
6Aa400
21
20
19
a
7
0
5 1
D
C 0
f0
9
8
7
6 g
y e w
* REVISED:
002
10
i y 2
,m Ara
>°
'SA
s,0 b y 9 no4 09/09/2
JecrtTRD! K [
'°
_ _
_ _ _ ZONING ATLAS
j J6 35 5 d 3 2 1 Z 1 ,roo
,2/01 00 w SE 1 /4 OF SECTION B
`" 305/6 12/03
? 305B
306A A
16 - 29 S - 15 E 1295
T 1 9
3:20 Pm Case Number: FL132005-07074 -- 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Owner(s): Magnolia Park Realty
607 W Bay St
Tampa, F133606
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: Scott Lincoln
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, Fl 33756
TELEPHONE: 727-446-9000, FAX: 727-446-9050, E-MAIL: slincoln@lacivil.com
Location: 0.827 acres located on the east side of South Ft. Harrison Avenue approximately 50 feet north of Magnolia
Drive and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 200 feet east of South Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Atlas Page: 295B
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: (1) Flexible Development to permit a Mixed Use of offices and attached dwellings in the Commercial and
Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5
feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building),
reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from
35 feet to 7.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from
10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet
to 8.02 feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to
seven feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), a
reduction to the side (south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the
side (east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to
sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from 25 feet to xx feet (to
flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office District from 30 feet to 37.7 feet (to
midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive lnfill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.F and 2-1004.13, and a reduction to the
landscape buffer along the west property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to
building), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10
feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 7.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 8.02
feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line in the Commercial and
Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west
property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer
along the east property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to
4.2 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the interior green space requirement from 10 percent to xx percent,
as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary
Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision.
Proposed Use: Mixed use
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, F133761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Association
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33756
301 Druid Rd. West
TELEPHONE: 727-447-8081, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III
Attendees Included: City Staff: 9/1/05: Wells, Thompson, Rice, Rickart, Keller, Glenn, Buzzell; 11/3/05: Wells,
Thompson, Rice, Rickart
Applicant/Rep: 9/1/05: Scott Lincoln, Jeff Smith, Brett Braciak, Andrew Hupp; 11/3/05: Lincoln, Hupp, Smith
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 64
1. A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of propertyowned by applicant. City
cannot authorize this construction.
2. Provide cross acces agreement with property owner to north.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Prior to buildign permit, provide a copy of a recorded cross access agreement with property
owner to north. Cross access agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to these
properties.
General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements,
the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water
mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
1 . No Issues.
Fire:
1 . Show Individual Riser Locations for each Town House. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a true 4 hour wall to consider these as individual buildings. 2
hour walls do not eliminate the requirement of fire sprinkler systems
2 . Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and
egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB.
10/18/2005 New plan shows 20' radius on Magnolia and no designation on Ft Harrison
3 . Show Fire Mains for each building. PRIOR TO CDB
10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a true 4 hour wall to consider these as individual buildings. 2
hour walls do not eliminate the requirement of fire sprinkler systems
4. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13R in Town Houses is required. PRIOR TO
CDB
10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a true 4 hour wall to consider these as individual buildings. 2
hour walls do not eliminate the requirement of fire sprinkler systems.
Harbor Master:
1 . No issues.
Legal:
I , No issues.
Land Resources:
I . No Issues.
Landscaping:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 65
10/26/05 - WW 0
Comment below is still applicable. Also, lights on west side of both townhome buildings will
interfere with balconies. Revise.
8/26/05 - WW
Site lighting on light poles shown on Sheet 4 conflicts with landscaping, especially trees, shown
on Sheet L-1. Trees will grow and shield out the lights, thus voiding any benefits anticipated by
site lighting. Then the owners will want to trim or remove the trees. To avoid this future
scenario, relocate light poles out of the landscape islands.
2 . 10/26/05 - WW
Comment below is still applicable. There are only two interior landscape islands provided and
there are/will be conflicts between the lights and the trees. Additionally, the cabbage palms
indicated on the east side of the office building on the south side of the walkway has inadequate
planting area, due to the second floor, which does not seem to be accounted for.
8/26/05 - WW
Ensure those areas indicated as "interior landscaping" can actually meet the landscape material
requirements of the Code, especially for trees. One examle is the island with the lift station that
appears suspect of not being able to meet the requirements.
3 . Sheet 4B - Shading is very light. Please darken. However, areas under the second floor of the
office building do not qualify for interior greenspace (anything planted will not grow due to no
sunlight. Note - Staff does not count the parking area under the building as vehicular use area
since it cannot be planted. Ensure calculations reflect such). Ensure Interior Green Areas
indicated meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.I with the minimum square footage,
dimensions and plant materials. Revise calculations and plan.
4. A monument-type sign is shown on Sheet 4 west of the office building. However, landscaping
on Sheet L-1 has not been coordinated with this proposed sign. Revise Sheet L-1.
5 . Information on the site plan documents and in the Narrative conflict regarding the provision of
Interior Green Space area. Sheet 1 in the Site Data indicates 8.6% being proposed, which is a
reduction from the required 10%. Sheet 4B indicates 13,699 square feet of total interior green
area being provided, which equals the total VUA of 13, 699 square feet. The Narrative indicates
a reduction is being requested from the 10% required to 8%. It is unclear what square footage
of Interior Green Area is being provided due to these inconsistencies. Provide on Sheet 4B the
square footage for each interior landscaped area, including the total square footage.
6. Inadequate justification has been submitted regarding the reductions to the landscape buffers
and interior landscape area requirements.
7. Revise Sheet 4B and the Project Narrative, Requested Deviations from the Development
Standards # 15 to show a 10-foot requirement (not five-foot).
Parks and Recreation:
1 . Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if
applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that
you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment.
Stormwater:
No Issues.
Solid Waste:
1 . That dumpster enclousure needs to be built to City code.
Allow 120 footprint for recycling carts for townhomes or will townhomes be on black
barrel/yellow bin service?
Traffic Engineering:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 66
Accessible route Prom public sidewalk to building's accessible entrance is not acceptable.
Width of path is not to Florida Building code ADA Chapter 11 standards. Also accessible route
must be located where a user is not compelled to walk or wheel behind a parked vehicle.
2. Provide proper striping for better flow at the curve to prevent motorists from impeding or
encroaching in opposing lanes.
3. Remove parking stall inside sight visibility triangle.
4. Provide wheel stops for parking spaces adjacent to office building.
5. Provide a detail showing a scaled passenger car backing out of the garage where the
motorist's sight visibility is not obstructed prior to the vehicles bumper entering the roadway.
6. Provide ramps with truncated domes per FDOT roadway design standards for driveway on
Magnolia Drive.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Prior to Building Permit:
1. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee
schedule.
2. Obtain FDOT permit for work within the state road right-of-way.
Planning:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 67
1 . 10/26/05 - WW • •
Since Harbor Oaks is removing the power lines related to their project and the power line to the
existing building on this property is being removed, and since the power line that traverses the
subject property north/south will only provide power to the office building to the north, is there
any ability to place this traversing power line underground or install conduit(s) for the future
undergrounding when the office building to the north is redeveloped?
8/25/05 - WW
Code requires underground electric and communication lines on-site.
2 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
3 . Potential condition to be included in Staff Report:
That a cross-access easement be recorded, upon request of the Planning Department, with the
property to the south.
4. Sheet 3 - Remove the sidewalk connector in the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW between the public
sidewalk and the roadway curb.
5 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
6. Based on the office building having a flat roof, provide the height to that point on the elevation
drawings. Since the cupola looks to include the upper portion of the elevator, the cupola will not
be included in any request to increase the height of the building (above 25 feet).
7 . 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal will "upgrade the immediate vicinity," especially in light of all of the
reductions and deviations requested.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 68
Revise Mixed Use• ulation on Sheets 1 and 4 to the following: •
Mixed Use Calculation for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
10/26/05
Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum density = 24
du/acre in CG land use) and Office District (maximum FAR = 0.50 and maximum density = 15
du/acre in R/OG land use)
1. Project areaZ"ZZZZ Z?Zi Zi,i,ZZ?ZZ, Z?Z.36,040 sf
2. Land area zoned Commercial Districtui,zuaz"Z00,184 sf
3. Permitted FAR in Commercial DistrictZZZ?ZZZ,?6(Z?..60.55
4. Floor area permitted in Commercial District"ZZZZ i,ZZ6Z 5,601 sf
5. Land area zoned Office DistrictZZZZ6Z?6"ZZZZ..25,856 sf
6. Permitted FAR in Office DlstrictLZZUL 6GZZZZZZZ40.50
8. Permitted FAR in Commercial District" 66 Z?ZZZZ?Z 5,601 sf
9. Floor area proposedZ?Z?Z?Z?...ZZ"Z ""- 5,214 sf
10. Subtract #9 from #8 (floor area not used in C DistrictULU".?387 sf
11. Land area not used in C District (#10 divided by 774 sf
12. Land area available in C District for attached dwellings" 774 sf
13. Divide by square footage in an acre"6. . .UU.= 43,560 sf
14. Lot acreage available for att. dw. in C District ((#12 - #13)Z6?6Z0.017 acre
15. Multiply lot acreage (#14)6a . ..ZZ?Z?Z?6?.0.017 acre
16. By maximum density in CG land use?6"L?Z"U...?.x 24 du/acre
17. Number of dwelling units (du) available in C District?Z""?.0.408 du
18. Land area in Office District"""Z""U"? .225,856 sf
19. Divide by square footage in an acre" ZZZZi""?.= 43,560 sf
20. Lot acreage in Office District"Za . . . ..? .0.593 acre
21. Multiply lot acreage (#20)"UZ?ZZZZ?Z"2..0.593 acre
22. By maximum density in R/OG land useZ?Z?ZZ"""x 15 du/acre
23. Number of dwelling units (du) available in Office District?ZZ?.... 8.895 du
24. Number of dwelling units available in C District"Z" ."..0.408 du
25. Number of dwelling units available in Office Districts ZUU8.895 du
26. Total number of dwelling units permitted on overall property
(add #17 plus #23)ULLLLL?LLLL?LLLLL?L..9.303 du
Total maximum permissible on overall property is 5,214 GFA office plus nine dwelling units.
9. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05- WW
General Appplicability criteria #5 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this proposal is
"consistent with the community character of the surrounding area."
10. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
General Appplicability criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this
development be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent
properties."
11 . Proposed dumpster at the east end of the cross access on the north side impedes the 24-foot wide
drive aisle to access the parking on the property to the north. Revise to provide this 24-foot drive
aisle access by removing one adjacent parking space and shifting dumpster eastward (Note: There
are four excess parking spaces being provided over the minimum required parking for the
offices).
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 69
0 0
12. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW "flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height are justified by the benefits
to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole."
13 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
14 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That, prior to the issuance of any permits, either a Unity of Title or a Final Plat be recorded in the
public records;
15 . 10/26/05 & 8/26/05 - WW
Show on Sheet 4 and L-1 the balconies indicated on the elevations, including the distance from
the face of the building to the edge of the balconies.
Section 3-908.13 permits balconies to extend no more than two feet into a required setback area.
Balconies indicated are proposed at 2.5 feet and will need to be included in the request for
setback reduction. Provide justification for the balconies extending greater than two feet.
16. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards."
17 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground, including outdoor lighting lines;
18 . 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses."
19 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding signs be a
monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
20. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infrll Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal "creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity" and for "the City of Clearwater as a whole."
21 . Revise architectural site plan on west side of five-unit townhome building to remove the
dumpster, since the civil site plan relocated the dumpster westward.
22 . Provide the scale of the drawings for the elevations for the townhome buildings (both four- and
five-unit buildings).
23 . Please be aware that the Harbor Oaks project to the north recently installed a six-foot high wall
along the common property line with this project. This may affect the location of landscaping,
handrails along the edge of the retention pond, etc.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 70
24 . The property todayis developed with a 6,486 one-story office building set back 10 feet from the
S. Ft. Harrison Avenue front property line and a large parking area that has no landscaping and is
at a zero setback to adjacent property lines. The proposal is to remove the existing building and
construct a 5,214 square foot two-story office building at a 10-foot front setback to S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue and nine three-story townhomes on the east side. Much of the pavement is still
proposed at a zero setback. There are numerous setback and landscape buffering reductions
requested.
The Staff concern is that in the redevelopment of property there is supposed to be improvement
to the site. With this proposal conformance with Code requirements (setbacks, landscaping, etc.)
is required. The proposal is requesting numerous setback and landscape buffering reductions.
The Mixed Use criteria calls for an improved site plan, landscaping in excess of the minimum,
improved design and appearance and more efficient parking. It is Staffs opinion that the site
design is an improvement over the existing situation, that the parking is more efficient and that
the appearance will be significantly improved over the existing. However, it is still a Staff
concerned with the reductions requested to landscaping standards. It is recognized that the site
size and configuration presents design constraints. It is further recognized that the existing
surrounding character is one of reduced front setbacks.
The Comprehensive Landscape Program anticipates that where reductions to landscape standards
are requested in certain areas of the site, there will be increases in other areas of the site. With
this being said, and with the Code criteria presumption that landscaping will be in excess of the
minimum, Staffs support of the project is based on trying to get as much landscaping on the site
as possible. Since the minimum parking is being exceeded by four parking spaces, it is
recommended to remove these four excess parking spaces. One will be lost to the relocation of
the dumpster, but the next adjacent parking space could also be lost to be turned into landscaping
(with a shade tree). Traffic wants the southern parking space adjacent to Magnolia Drive
removed from the visibility triangle. The handicap parking space will need to relocate to be
under the southern part of the building and the current location can be redesigned to two parking
spaces, narrowing the terminal landscape island to the west by one foot, but the island can be
lengthened due to the removal of the handicap accessible path. Due to the location of the lift
station and desired light pole that will restrict tree planting in this terminal landscape island,
reconnnend eliminating the parking space to the west of the island to create a larger island (plant
with a shade tree). Would like to see as much of the parking area southeast of the office building
placed in landscaping (with shade trees). The retention pond could be planted with cypress trees.
Parking lot light poles should be strategically placed (and potentially the height of the poles) to
avoid conflicts with the future tree canopies. Sidewalks providing access to the townhomes
facing Magnolia Drive can be narrowed. Any other location where additional landscaping can be
placed should be explored. Could the parking area be redesigned to provide angled parking
(one-way flow to the east), increasing landscaping?
Other:
No Comments
Notes: To be placed on the 12/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all
above departments' comments by 9am, 11/9/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 71
0
3:20 Pm Case Number: FLD2005-070"T4 -- 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Owner(s): Magnolia Park Realty 1 , ??
607 W Bay St 0 ism
Tampa, F133606
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
IM!k
Representative: Scott Lincoln
1446 Court Street V-400b W40th
Clearwater, F133756
TELEPHONE: 727-446-9000, FAX: 727-446-9050, E-MAIL: slincoln@lacivil.com
Location: 0.827 acres located on the east side of South Ft. Harrison Avenue approximately 50 feet north of Magnolia
Drive and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 200 feet east of South Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Atlas Page: 295B
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: (1) Flexible Development to permit a Mixed Use of offices and attached dwellings in the Commercial and
Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5
feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building),
reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from
35 feet to 7.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from
10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet
to 8.02 feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to
seven feet (to building), from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to four feet (to sidewalk), a
reduction to the side (south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the
side (east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to
sidewalk), an increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from 25 feet to xx feet (to
flat roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office District from 30 feet to 37.7 feet (to
midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill
Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-7041 and 2-1004.D, and a reduction to the
landscape buffer along the west property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to 10 feet (to
building), reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10
feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 7.34 feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 8.02
feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property line in the Commercial and
Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west
property line in the Office District from 10 feet to one foot (to pavement), reductions to the landscape buffer
along the east property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to
4.2 feet (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the interior green space requirement from 10 percent to xx percent,
as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary
Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision.
Proposed Use: Mixed use
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Association
Association(s): Clearwater, F133756
301 Druid Rd. West
TELEPHONE: 727-447-8081, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III
Attendees Included: City Staff: 9/1/05: Wells, Thompson, Rice, Rickart, Keller, Glenn, Buzzell; 11/3/05: Wells,
Thompson, Rice, Rickart
Applicant/Rep: 9/1/05: Scott Lincoln, Jeff Smith, Brett Braciak, Andrew Hupp; 11/3/05: Lincoln, Hupp, Smith, Braciak
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 64
1 . 1. A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant. City
cannot authorize this construction.
2. Provide cross acces agreement with property owner to north.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Prior to buildign permit, provide a copy of a recorded cross access agreement with property
owner to north. Cross access agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to these
properties.
General Note: If the proposed project necessitates infrastructure modifications to satisfy
site-specific water capacity and pressure requirements and/or wastewater capacity requirements,
the modifications shall be completed by the applicant and at their expense. If underground water
mains and hydrants are to be installed, the installation shall be completed and in service prior to
construction in accordance with Fire Department requirements.
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
1 . No Issues.
Fire:
1 . Show Individual Riser Locations for each Town House. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a true 4 hour wall to consider these as individual buildings. 2
hour walls do not eliminate the requirement of fire sprinkler systems
2. Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and
egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB.
10/18/2005 New plan shows 20' radius on Magnolia and no designation on Ft Harrison
3 . Show Fire Mains for each building. PRIOR TO CDB
10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a true 4 hour wall to consider these as individual buildings. 2
hour walls do not eliminate the requirement of fire sprinkler systems
4. A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13R in Town Houses is required. PRIOR TO
CDB
10/17/2005 Fire AHJ requires a true 4 hour wall to consider these as individual buildings
hour walls do not eliminate the requirement of fire sprinkler systems.
Harbor Master:
No issues.
Legal:
No issues.
Land Resources:
1 . No Issues.
Landscaping:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 65
1 . 10/26/05 - WW •
Comment below is still applicable. Also, lights on west side of both townhome buildings will
interfere with balconies. Revise.
8/26/05 - WW
Site lighting on light poles shown on Sheet 4 conflicts with landscaping, especially trees, shown
on Sheet L-1. Trees will grow and shield out the lights, thus voiding any benefits anticipated by
site lighting. Then the owners will want to trim or remove the trees. To avoid this future
scenario, relocate light poles out of the landscape islands.
2. 10/26/05 - WW
Comment below is still applicable. There are only two interior landscape islands provided and
there are/will be conflicts between the lights and the trees. Additionally, the cabbage palms
indicated on the east side of the office building on the south side of the walkway has inadequate
planting area, due to the second floor, which does not seem to be accounted for.
8/26/05 - WW
Ensure those areas indicated as "interior landscaping" can actually meet the landscape material
requirements of the Code, especially for trees. One examle is the island with the lift station that
appears suspect of not being able to meet the requirements.
3 . Sheet 4B - Shading is very light. Please darken. However, areas under the second floor of the
office building do not qualify for interior greenspace (anything planted will not grow due to no
sunlight. Note - Staff does not count the parking area under the building as vehicular use area
since it cannot be planted. Ensure calculations reflect such). Ensure Interior Green Areas
indicated meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.I with the minimum square footage,
dimensions and plant materials. Revise calculations and plan.
4. A monument-type sign is shown on Sheet 4 west of the office building. However, landscaping
on Sheet L-1 has not been coordinated with this proposed sign. Revise Sheet L-1.
5 . Information on the site plan documents and in the Narrative conflict regarding the provision of
Interior Green Space area. Sheet 1 in the Site Data indicates 8.6% being proposed, which is a
reduction from the required 10%. Sheet 4B indicates 13,699 square feet of total interior green
area being provided, which equals the total VUA of 13, 699 square feet. The Narrative indicates
a reduction is being requested from the 10% required to 8%. It is unclear what square footage
of Interior Green Area is being provided due to these inconsistencies. Provide on Sheet 4B the
square footage for each interior landscaped area, including the total square footage.
6. Inadequate justification has been submitted regarding the reductions to the landscape buffers
and interior landscape area requirements.
7. Revise Sheet 4B and the Project Narrative, Requested Deviations from the Development
Standards #15 to show a 10-foot requirement (not five-foot).
Parks and Recreation:
1 . Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if
applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that
you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment.
Stormwater:
1 . No Issues.
Solid Waste:
I . That dumpster enclousure needs to be built to City code.
Allow 12x3 footprint for recycling carts for townhomes or will townhomes be on black
barrel/yellow bin service?
Traffic Engineering:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 66
Accessible route f• public sidewalk to building's accessible entrance is not acceptable.
Width of path is not to Florida Building code ADA Chapter 11 standards. Also accessible route
must be located where a user is not compelled to walk or wheel behind a parked vehicle.
2. Provide proper striping for better flow at the curve to prevent motorists from impeding or
encroaching in opposing lanes.
3. Remove parking stall inside sight visibility triangle.
4. Provide wheel stops for parking spaces adjacent to office building.
5. Provide a detail showing a scaled passenger car backing out of the garage where the
motorist's sight visibility is not obstructed prior to the vehicles bumper entering the roadway.
6. Provide ramps with truncated domes per FDOT roadway design standards for driveway on
Magnolia Drive.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Planning:
Prior to Building Permit:
1. General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee
schedule.
2. Obtain FDOT permit for work within the state road right-of-way.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 67
1 . 10/26/05 - WW •
Since Harbor Oaks is removing the power lines related to their project and the power line to the
existing building on this property is being removed, and since the power line that traverses the
subject property north/south will only provide power to the office building to the north, is there
any ability to place this traversing power line underground or install conduit(s) for the future
undergrounding when the office building to the north is redeveloped?
8/25/05 - WW
Code requires underground electric and communication lines on-site.
2 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
3 . Potential condition to be included in Staff Report:
That a cross-access easement be recorded, upon request of the Planning Department, with the
property to the south.
4. Sheet 3 - Remove the sidewalk connector in the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW between the public
sidewalk and the roadway curb.
5 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
6. Based on the office building having a flat roof, provide the height to that point on the elevation
drawings. Since the cupola looks to include the upper portion of the elevator, the cupola will not
be included in any request to increase the height of the building (above 25 feet).
7. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal will "upgrade the immediate vicinity," especially in light of all of the
reductions and deviations requested.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 68
Revise Mixed Use Vulation on Sheets 1 and 4 to the following: S
10/26/05
Mixed Use Calculation for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum density = 24
du/acre in CG land use) and Office District (maximum FAR = 0.50 and maximum density = 15
du/acre in R/OG land use)
1. Project areaZZZUZ?Z" Z"ZZ?Z?Z?Z.36,040 sf
2. Land area zoned Commercial DistrictaZZ ZUi,?10,184 sf
3. Permitted FAR in Commercial District. . . "UZ. J.55
4. Floor area permitted in Commercial DistrictZ"" ZUZZ 5,601 sf
5.. Land area zoned Office District"ZZ? ZUZZ Z "..25,856 sf
6. Permitted FAR in Office District" ZZZZ?ZZZ UUO.50
8. Permitted FAR in Commercial District?ZZZZZZZZZ6Z? 5,601 sf
9. Floor area proposeda"Z? LZ...5,214 sf
10. Subtract #9 from #8 (floor area not used in C District?ZUU?.Z387 sf
11. Land area not used in C District (#10 divided by #6)Z"U"? = 774 sf
12. Land area available in C District for attached dwellingsa66 6..774 sf
13. Divide by square footage in an acre??U? Z,"Ua.= 43,560 sf
14. Lot acreage available for att. dw. in C District ((#12 _ #13)?"ZZ 0.017 acre
15. Multiply lot acreage (#14)Z"ZZ ZZ"""ZZZZZ.0.017 acre
16. By maximum density in CG land useZaa ?ZZ?Z...?.x 24 du/acre
17. Number of dwelling units (du) available in C DistrictUZZ x.0.408 du
18. Land area in Office Districq"""? LUUZU. 25,856 sf
19. Divide by square footage in an acrea? LUZUUZ?.= 43,560 sf
20. Lot acreage in Office DistrictZa""ZU?L" .0.593 acre
21. Multiply lot acreage (#20)?L"U?L"?L"U ..0.593 acre
22. By maximum density in R/OG land use???""""? x 15 du/acre
23. Number of dwelling units (du) available in Office DistrictZZZ?.... 8.895 du
24. Number of dwelling units available in C DistrictL"ZZ .Z?..0.408 du
25. Number of dwelling units available in Office Districta"U&895 du
26. Total number of dwelling units permitted on overall property
(add #17 plus #23)?La"""Ua"Za..9.303 du
Total maximum permissible on overall property is 5,214 GFA office plus nine dwelling units.
9 . 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
General Appplicability criteria #5 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this proposal is
"consistent with the community character of the surrounding area."
10. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
General Appplicability criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this
development be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent
properties."
11 . Proposed dumpster at the east end of the cross access on the north side impedes the 24-foot wide
drive aisle to access the parking on the property to the north. Revise to provide this 24-foot drive
aisle access by removing one adjacent parking space and shifting dumpster eastward (Note: There
are four excess parking spaces being provided over the minimum required parking for the
offices).
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 69
12. 10/26/05 - WW 0 •
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW "flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height are justified by the benefits
to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole."
13 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
14. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That, prior to the issuance of any permits, either a Unity of Title or a Final Plat be recorded in the
public records;
15 . 10/26/05 & 8/26/05 - WW
Show on Sheet 4 and L-1 the balconies indicated on the elevations, including the distance from
the face of the building to the edge of the balconies.
Section 3-908.D permits balconies to extend no more than two feet into a required setback area.
Balconies indicated are proposed at 2.5 feet and will need to be included in the request for
setback reduction. Provide justification for the balconies extending greater than two feet.
16. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards."
17 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground, including outdoor lighting lines;
18. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses."
19. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding signs be a
monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
20. 10/26/05 - WW
Revise the application to place your applicable response #23 comments.
8/26/05 - WW
Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal "creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity" and for "the City of Clearwater as a whole."
21 . Revise architectural site plan on west side of five-unit townhome building to remove the
dumpster, since the civil site plan relocated the dumpster westward.
22 . Provide the scale of the drawings for the elevations for the townhome buildings (both four- and
five-unit buildings).
23 . Please be aware that the Harbor Oaks project to the north recently installed a six-foot high wall
along the common property line with this project. This may affect the location of landscaping,
handrails along the edge of the retention pond, etc.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 70
24. The property todayis developed with a 6,486 one-story office buildi t back 10 feet from the
S. Ft. Harrison Avenue front property line and a large parking area that has no landscaping and is
at a zero setback to adjacent property lines. The proposal is to remove the existing building and
construct a 5,214 square foot two-story office building at a 10-foot front setback to S. Ft.
Harrison Avenue and nine three-story townhomes on the east side. Much of the pavement is still
proposed at a zero setback. There are numerous setback and landscape buffering reductions
requested.
The Staff concern is that in the redevelopment of property there is supposed to be improvement
to the site. With this proposal conformance with Code requirements (setbacks, landscaping, etc.)
is required. The proposal is requesting numerous setback and landscape buffering reductions.
The Mixed Use criteria calls for an improved site plan, landscaping in excess of the minimum,
improved design and appearance and more efficient parking. It is Staffs opinion that the site
design is an improvement over the existing situation, that the parking is more efficient and that
the appearance will be significantly improved over the existing. However, it is still a Staff
concerned with the reductions requested to landscaping standards. It is recognized that the site
size and configuration presents design constraints. It is further recognized that the existing
surrounding character is one of reduced front setbacks.
The Comprehensive Landscape Program anticipates that where reductions to landscape standards
are requested in certain areas of the site, there will be increases in other areas of the site. With
this being said, and with the Code criteria presumption that landscaping will be in excess of the
minimum, Staffs support of the project is based on trying to get as much landscaping on the site
as possible. Since the minimum parking is being exceeded by four parking spaces, it is
recommended to remove these four excess parking spaces. One will be lost to the relocation of
the dumpster, but the next adjacent parking space could also be lost to be turned into landscaping
(with a shade tree). Traffic wants the southern parking space adjacent to Magnolia Drive
removed from the visibility triangle. The handicap parking space will need to relocate to be
under the southern part of the building and the current location can be redesigned to two parking
spaces, narrowing the terminal landscape island to the west by one foot, but the island can be
lengthened due to the removal of the handicap accessible path. Due to the location of the lift
station and desired light pole that will restrict tree planting in this terminal landscape island,
recommend eliminating the parking space to the west of the island to create a larger island (plant
with a shade tree). Would like to see as much of the parking area southeast of the office building
placed in landscaping (with shade trees). The retention pond could be planted with cypress trees.
Parking lot light poles should be strategically placed (and potentially the height of the poles) to
avoid conflicts with the future tree canopies. Sidewalks providing access to the townhomes
facing Magnolia Drive can be narrowed. Any other location where additional landscaping can be
placed should be explored. Could the parking area be redesigned to provide angled parking
(one-way flow to the east), increasing landscaping?
Other:
No Comments
Notes: To be placed on the 12/20/05 CDB agenda, submit 15 collated copies of the revised plans & application material addressing all
above departments' comments by noon, 11/8/05. Packets shall be collated, folded and stapled as appropriate.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, November 3, 2005 - Page 71
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Wells, Wayne
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 8:56 AM
To: Glenn, Tom
Cc: Buzzell, William
Subject: DRC Review Comments
Tom -
Just checking with you to confirm your reviews on the following cases on the November 3, 2005, DRC agenda, since I will
be sending out the comments later today (Monday):
1. Case FLD2005-09101 - 170 Brightwater Drive - You have indicated in the Activities in Permit Plan on 10/18/05 that you
are DONE, but there is no CONDITIONS that say NO ISSUES. If you are okay with the project as designed, I can add the
condition of "No Issues" if you would like.
2. Case FLD2005-09102 - 201 Brightwater Drive - You have indicated in the Activities in Permit Plan on 10/18/05 that you
are DONE, but there is no CONDITIONS that say NO ISSUES. If you are okay with the project as designed, I can add the
condition of "No Issues" if you would like.
3. Case FLD2005-09095 - 161 Brightwater Drive - You have indicated in the Activities in Permit Plan on 10/18/05 that you
are DONE, but there is no CONDITIONS that say NO ISSUES. If you are okay with the project as designed, I can add the
condition of "No Issues" if you would like.
4. FLD2005-07074 - 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue - The proposed dumpster location restricts the required 24' wide drive
aisle to the parking area for the property to the north of the subject site. Solution would be to shift the dumpster enclosure
to the east one space. There are overhead power lines one parking space farther to the east. Would this be a problem?
You probably need to look at the plans for this (the overhead power lines are indicated on Sheets 3 and 4.
Could you respond to me this morning so that I can send the comments out this afternoon. Thanks
Wayne
9 9
10/26/05
Mixed Use Calculation for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum
density = 24 du/acre in CG land use) and Office District (maximum FAR = 0.50 and
maximum density = 15 du/acre in R/OG land use)
Project area ......................................................................36,040 sf
2. Land area zoned Commercial District .......................................10,184 sf
3. Permitted FAR in Commercial District .........................................0.55
4. Floor area permitted in Commercial District ................................. 5,601 sf
5. Land area zoned Office District ...............................................25,856 sf
6. Permitted FAR in Office District ................................................0.50
8. Permitted FAR in Commercial District ....................................... 5,601 sf
9. Floor area proposed ............................................................. 5,214 sf
10. Subtract #9 from #8 (floor area not used in C District .........................387 sf
11. Land area not used in C District (#10 divided by #6) ........................= 774 sf
12. Land area available in C District for attached dwellings .......................774 sf
13. Divide by square footage in an acre ........................................- 43,560 sf
14. Lot acreage available for att. dw. in C District ((#12 - #13) ...............0.017 acre
15. Multiply lot acreage (#14) .......................................................0.017 acre
16. By maximum density in CG land use ........................................x 24 du/acre
17. Number of dwelling units (du) available in C District ......................0.408 du
18. Land area in Office District ....................................................25,856 sf
19. Divide by square footage in an acre ........................................= 43,560 sf
20. Lot acreage in Office District .................................................0.593 acre
21. Multiply lot acreage (#20) .....................................................0.593 acre
22. By maximum density in R/OG land use ....................................x 15 du/acre
23. Number of dwelling units (du) available in Office District ................8.895 du
24. Number of dwelling units available in C District ...........................0.408 du
25. Number of dwelling units available in Office District .....................8.895 du
26. Total number of dwelling units permitted on overall property
(add #17 plus #23) ..............................................................9.303 du
Total maximum permissible on overall property is 5,214 GFA office plus nine
dwelling units.
i •
Wells, Wayne
From: Rice, Scott
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 2:46 PM
To: 'slincoln@lacivil.com'
Cc: Elbo, Bennett; Doherty, Steve; Wells, Wayne
Subject: FLD2005-07074 - 907 S Ft Harrison
Scott,
In our discussion of the subject project at the DRC Meeting yesterday, I misinterpreted Traffic Comment #4:
4. Show that a vehicle can back out of garage without impairing motorist's sight visibility especially adjacent to a
pedestrian pathway.
The issue is not only pedestrian related, but also concerns vehicles entering the travelway without sufficient sight distance.
The approach that has been taken on all recent projects (including Old Clearwater City Flats) is that the driver's position
within the vehicle should exit the garage prior to the vehicle entering the travelway or beginning to cross the sidewalk. This
would require a driveway length of between 8 and 10 feet from either the edge of the travelway or back of sidewalk. This
will impact both sides of the private street between the rows of townhomes.
I apologize for my confusion on this issue. This requirement will need to be addressed when the project is resubmitted.
D. Scott Rice
Land Devel. Engr. Manager
727-562-4781
scott.rice@MyClearwater.com
i 0 frb%VAI
2:00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-07074 -- 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
•, i p
• Owner(s): Magnolia Park Realty
607 W Bay St
Tampa, FI 33606
: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
TELEPHONE:
Representative: Scott Lincoln C?Ww%4 6
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, Fl 33756
TELEPHONE: 727-446-9000, FAX: 727-446-9050, E-MAIL: slincoln@lacivil.com
Location: 0.827 acres located on the east side of South Ft. Harrison Avenue approximately 50 feet north of Magnolia
Drive and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 200 feet east of South Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Atlas Page: 2956
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: (1) Flexible Development to permit a Mixed Use of offices and attached dwellings in the Commercial and
Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5
feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to xx feet (to building),
reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet to 8.3 feet (to building) and from
35 feet to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from 10
feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to
7.8 feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to five
feet (to building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south and west)
setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback
in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an
increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from 25 feet to xx feet (to midpoint of
roof) with an additional xx feet for architectural embellishment (from midpoint of roof), an increase to
building height for townhomes in the Office District from 30 feet to xx feet (to midpoint of roof) and to
permit buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sections 2-704.F and 2-1004.1), and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west
property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to xx feet (to building), reductions to the
landscape buffer along the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.3 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line
in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer
along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.8 feet (to building), a reduction to the
landscape buffer along the south property line in the Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero
feet (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Office District
from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a
10-lot subdivision.
Proposed Use: Mixed use
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Association
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33756
301 Druid Rd. West
TELEPHONE: 727-447-8081, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner III
Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart, Jim Keller, Tom Glenn, Bill
Buzzell
Applicant/Rep: Scott Lincoln, Jeff Smith, Brett Braciak, Andrew Hupp
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 39
A sanitary sewenhole is located in Magnolia Drive 150 east of manhole in S. Ft. Harrison
Ave. where proposed force main tap is to be made. Revise plan to show f.m. connection to
manhole in Magnolia Drive. 9/2/05 - Applicant reviewed the system with Don. He believes there
is some problem with'the manhole we suggested or the line between this manhole and the one he
proposed to use. Applicant was told that before building permit he needs to investigate further
and justify his proposed plan.
2. Delete sheets 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12. Resubmit these sheets for building permit review.
3. Retention pond cannot be located on a separate lot. Combine Tracts A and B.
4. Words "City of Clearwater" shall not be on any privately owned manhole covers.
5. Preliminary Plat: Provide property owner address and telephone on the preliminary plat and
reference the section, township and range in which the property is located.
6. A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant. Will
proposed sidewalk, (not a driving surface), interfere with access to property owned by other(s)?
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
The following to be addressed prior to building permit:
1. Final plat must be recorded with Pinellas County prior to a Building Permit being issued for
any vertical construction (Development Code 4-708).
2. Provide a copy of a recorded cross-access agreement with property owner to north. Cross
access agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to the properties.
3. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to
standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.)
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
I . Pond Cross-section indicates pond is existing, however, current City Standards prohibit vertical
walls in retention ponds that are located along the boundaries of adjacent parcels of land. Please
revise.
Fire:
I . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING
JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION.
2. Entrance on Fort Harrison SHALL be 24 foot in width
3 . Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building access as
hose lays. PRIOR TO CDB
4. Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and
egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB.
5 . A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R in Town Houses is required.
PRIOR TO CDB
6. Is New Office Building to be Sprinklered ?
7. Show Individual Riser Locations for each Town House. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
8 . No Unprotected openings within 10' of Exit Stair in accordance with NFPA 101, 2003 Edition.
PRIOR TO PERMIT
9. Dumpster must be 10' from building. PRIOR TO CDB
10. Show Fire Mains for each Town Home. PRIOR TO CDB
Harbor Master:
1 . No issues.
Legal:
I . No issues.
Land Resources:
No Issues.
Landscaping:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 40
I . As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program application, indi all landscape
requirements (including buffers) requested to be waived or modified. Provide the justification
for each reduction requested.
2. Unclear how the shaded area indicating "interior green area" close to the bottom of the retention
pond will meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.1 Code for landscaping materials within
the interior green area (since it could be wet).
3 . Site lighting on light poles shown on Sheet 4 conflicts with landscaping, especially trees, shown
on Sheet L-1. Trees will grow and shield out the lights, thus voiding any benefits anticipated by
site lighting. Then the owners will want to trim or remove the trees. To avoid this future
scenario, relocate light poles out of the landscape islands.
4. Ensure those areas indicated as "interior landscaping" can actually meet the landscape material
requirements of the Code, especially for trees. One examle is the island with the lift station that
appears suspect of not being able to meet the requirements.
Parks and Recreation:
1 . Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if
applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that
you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment.
Stormwater:
I . Before Building Permit
1) Dry ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less.
Solid Waste:
I . That dumpster enclousure needs to be built to City code.
Allow 120 footprint for recycling carts for townhomes or will townhomes be on black
barrel/yellow bin service?
Traffic Engineering:
1 . 1. Remove monument sign from within sight visibility triangle.
2. Show geometric features East of the property i.e. is there a roadway or property that the road
connects to, or is it a dead end? If it is a dead end, show end of roadway markers.
3. Roadway width must meet the City's Fire Department requirements.
4. Show that a vehicle can back out of garage without impairing motorist's sight visibility
especially adjacent to a pedestrian pathway.
5. Minimum required width of Drive Aisle to Ft. Harrison is 24-feet; plan shows only 22-feet.
6. Per Community Development Code Sec. 3-904 (A), sight visibility triangles are to be
measured from property lines, not back of curb. Objects must not encroach in sight visibilty
triangles unless they meet the height limitations i.e. building inside sight triangle may be
problematic.
7. Show an accessible path from public sidewalk to proposed office building's accessible
entrance.
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule.
Planning:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 41
•
1 . 8/14/05 - WW •
Indicate the second 7" oak tree from the south property line to also be removed.
8/8/05 - WW
Indicate on Sheet 3 and Sheet L-1 all trees proposed to be removed.
2 . Revise the required office parking on Sheet 1 from 25 spaces to 23 spaces.
3 . Provide the dimension from the front property line along Magnolia Drive to the edge of pavement
on the west side of the driveway.
4. Sheet 4 - Revise the visibility triangles on S. Ft. Harrison to the property line from the pavement
line.
5 . At the east end of the cross access on the north side, is there adequate turning movements for fire
truck to not only access the subject property but also the property to the north? With the
proposed landscape island at this east end of the cross access, how does the location of this
landscape island affect access to and/or actual parking layout on the parking for the property to
the north? Show parking layout for the parking lot to the north and revise this proposed parking
lot appropriately to avoid impacts on vehicular turning movements and access.
6. Access to the southwesternmost townhome is via the drive aisle, no sidewalk access (all other
units have sidewalk access)?
7 . Building Code requires a stoop/landing at the end (ground floor) of the open stairs on the north
side of the office building. Show on all appropriate sheets.
8 . Demonstrate compliance with Building Code requirements for the south side of the office
building for the percentage of openings allowed, based on the closeness of the proposed building
to the property line, as well as the building to the south being at a 2.8-foot setback to the common
property line. ,
Also, demonstrate compliance with Building Code requirements for location of windows with
respect to the required egress stairs on the north side of the building.
9. Provide the dimension from the face of the building to the edge for the roof overhang on the
elevations for the office building.
10, Site plan indicates an eight-foot wide sidewalk from the public sidewalk within the Ft. Harrison
right-of-way to the front of the building. However, neither the floor plan for the ground floor of
this building nor the west elevation provides any entrance on the west side of this building.
Revise the site plan sheets, or the floor plan and west building elevation.
11 . Unclear why the site plans indicate a sidewalk is to be installed within the Magnolia Drive ROW
for the frontage of an adjacent property owner (909 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue) and the construction
of a H/C ramp on S. Ft. Harrison at the intersection (in front of Jannelli's property). This is Dr.
Jannelli's parking lot, with parking spaces out in the ROW of Magnolia Drive.
12 . Unclear as to why crosswalks at the west side of the townhomes, along with the little piece of
sidewalk within the landscape island, are being installed. Advise/revise.
13 . Sheet 4 - Sign on Magnolia Drive must meet a five-foot setback to property lines.
14 . Any freestanding signage proposed for the office building? If so, show the location and setback
on Sheets 4 and L-1.
15 . Sheet 4, 4B,-5,, 6 and L-1 are inconsistent with the floor plans (ground and second) for the office
for the east side of the building, as there is building and concrete covering most of the interior
green area shown at this building entrance. Revise all appropriate sheets.
16. Observation: The northwesternmost unit, with the front door on the west side of the unit, does not
seem very desirable due to the dumpster location (which one must walk past to get to the front
door).
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 42
17. Based on a Mixed calculation with a 5,652 square-foot office b i ing, only a maximum of
eight dwellings is permitted on this property (nine proposed). Cannot round up, per Section
3-902.D. Reduce by one dwelling unit.
Mixed Use Calculation for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum density = 24
du/acre) and Office District (maximum FAR = 0.50 and maximum density = 15 du/acre)
1. Project arealL"UGL ZLZLZZGZGZZZZZL 36,040 sf
2. Land area zoned Commercial 10, 184 sf
3. Permitted FAR in Commercial District" ZZ UZ"..Z0.55
4. Floor area permitted in Commercial DistrictZ?ZZ?Z""Z 5,601 sf
5. Land area zoned Office District"" ZZZUZZZZ?..25,856 sf
6. Permitted FAR in Office DistrlctZGZ"L GGGU"GG GO•50
7. Floor area permitted in Office District?U" Z""".12,928 sf
8. Floor area proposed ZUZ? Z?ZZUL"""6 5,652 sf
9. Permitted FAR in Commercial District #4..?ZZUZ"6Z- 5,601 sf
10. Subtract #9 from #8 (floor area attributable to Office District6ZZU 52 sf
11. Land area attributable in Office District (#10 divided by #6)?ZZ??= 102 sf
12. Land area available in Office District for attached dwellings
(#5 minus #11) 6G(,L66(,6LLGGL000"U"25,754 sf
13. Land area in an acre 43,560 sf
14. Lot acreage for attached dwellings (#12 divided by #13)...U ..= 0.591 acres
15. Multiply lot acreage 0.591 acres
16. Maximum density in Office District?.. . . ..ZZ.x 15 du/acre
17. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted = 8 du
18 . Coordinate the location and number of windows and doors on the first and second floors with that
depicted on the office building elevations (currently inconsistent).
19 . Code requires underground electric and communication lines on-site.
20. Sheet 3 - Remove the sidewalk connector in the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW between the public
sidewalk and the roadway curb.
21 . Potential condition to be included in Staff Report:
That a cross-access easement be recorded, upon request of the Planning Department, with the
property to the south.
22 . Revise your "Requested Deviations" to that listed by Staff above. (Note: There is no parking
reduction requested).
23 . Today the property is developed with a 6,486 square-foot office building (square footage has
probably not been calculated per the definition of gross floor area) with a parking lot that is at a
zero setback to property lines and the eastern portion vacant.
The proposal removes the one-story office building to construct a two-story office building,
essentially at the same setbacks and square footage as presently, with a parking lot at a zero
setback to property lines, with townhomes introduced (at requested reduced setbacks).
Other than a redeveloped site with more on the site and a new office building, Staff is unclear
what benefit the City is receiving. The Community Development Code is a performance based
Code, where there is supposed to be improvements OVER THAT EXISTING to the site through
redevelopment. Mixed use criteria calls for an improved site plan, landscaping in excess of the
mimimum, improved design and appearance and more efficient parking. Unclear how these
criteria are being achieved through this proposal. Additionally, due to the number and nature of
the reductions being sought, and the design such produces, it appears that the site is being
overdeveloped.
24 . General Appplicability criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this
development be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent
properties."
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 43
25 . General Appplicab criteria #5 response: Provide specific exam Ales of HOW this proposal is
"consistent with the community character of the surrounding area."
26. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards."
27 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses."
28 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal will "upgrade the immediate vicinity," especially in light of all of the
reductions and deviations requested.
29 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal "creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity" and for "the City of Clearwater as a whole."
30 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW "flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height are justified by the benefits
to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole."
31 . Revise the Project Narrative to match the square footage of the office building proposed on the
site plan Sheet 1, as well as the number of parking spaces required/provided for the office
building. Otherwise revise according to the request as outlined by Staff above.
32 . Sheet 4A - Either add onto each lot or in a table on the sheet the square footage for all lots.
33 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
34 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That, prior to the issuance of any permits, either a Unity of Title or a Final Plat be recorded in the
public records;
35 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding signs be a
monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
36. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
37 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
38 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground, including outdoor lighting lines;
39 . Show the location of electric poles to be retained on-site and/or overhead power and
communication lines for adjacent parcels that will continue to traverse the site to determine
conflicts with proposed improvements, especially parking and landscaping.
40. Based on the location of the outside condensing units indicated on the south and west elevations,
unclear if this proposed location of the a/c units is limited to that area shown or if there is
additional flat roof for the rest of the building, and potentially on both sides of the cupola.
Unclear as to roof structure, as to what is flat versus pitched. Suggest submitting a roof plan to
assist. Reason for such request is to determine where building height will be measured to and
what height will be advertised.
41 . Sheet 4 indicates a two-foot overhang at the rear of the townhomes and indentations where the a/c
units are located. However, based on the elevations submitted, I do not see any two-foot
overhangs (assumed to be outside walls of the second/third floors) nor the indentations in the
locations as indicated on Sheet 4. Clarify and/or coordinate site and building elevations.
42. Show on Sheet 4 and L-I the balconies indicated on the elevations, including the distance from
the face of the building to the edge of the balconies.
43 . Building elevations submitted is for the four-unit townhome building. Correct the elevations
according to which direction they face, as the south is actually north, north is actually south...
44. Sheet 4 - show the location of garage doors for all units.
45 . It is assumed, since floor plans were not submitted for the townhomes, that the end units with
access to the side of the unit (east or west side of the building) will also have stairs similar to the
interior units shown, but that those stairs are internal to the unit. Advise.
46. Rear of townhomes appears as a three-story mass of building, with no indentations or other
features (such as balconies) to break up the solid mass of this side of the building. Of concern is
the southern townhome building, as the rear of this building faces Magnolia Drive.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 44
47 . Provide on the Ailing elevations the overall length and depth of theTuilding (for both
buildings). Ensure that these dimensions match that indicated on Sheet 4. Currently, Sheet 4
indicates a building depth of 40 feet with a two-foot overhang, yet the building elevation scales at
42 feet on the ground level. Sheet 4 also indicates a building length of 100.67 feet, whereas the
elevation for the four-unit townhome building scales to 99.5 feet in length.
48 . Proposed garage doors for the townhomes - Do the door lift vertically or do they pivot, opening
over the adjacent sidewalk. If the latter, this would appear to be a problem for pedestrians
walking adjacent to an opening garage door that would hit them. Advise.
Other:
No Comments
Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by noon on 9/30/05 for review by
DRC on 11/3/05.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 45
2.00 pm Case Number: FLD2005-07074 -- 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
Owner(s): Magnolia Park Realty
607 W Bay St
Tampa, 33606
TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Representative: Scott Lincoln
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, Fl 33756
TELEPHONE: 727-446-9000, FAX: 727-446-9050, E-MAIL: slincoln@lacivil.com
Location: 0.827 acres located on the east side of South Ft. Harrison Avenue approximately 50 feet north of Magnolia
Drive and on the north side of Magnolia Drive approximately 200 feet east of South Ft. Harrison Avenue.
Atlas Page: 295B
Zoning District: C, Commercial
Request: (1) Flexible Development to permit a Mixed Use of offices and attached dwellings in the Commercial and
Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial District from 100 feet to 79.5
feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial District from 25 feet to xx feet (to building),
reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office District from 35 feet to 8.3 feet (to building) and from
35 feet to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from 10
feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to
7.8 feet (to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to five
feet (to building) and from 10 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south and west)
setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback
in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an
increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from 25 feet to xx feet (to midpoint of
roof) with an additional xx feet for architectural embellishment (from midpoint of roof), an increase to
building height for townhomes in the Office District from 30 feet to xx feet (to midpoint of roof) and to
permit buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive lnfill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sections 2-704.F and 2-1004.1), and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west
property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue from 15 feet to xx feet (to building), reductions to the
landscape buffer along the south property line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.3 feet (to building)
and from 10 feet to xx feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line
in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer
along the north property line in the Office District from 10 feet to 7.8 feet (to building), a reduction to the
landscape buffer along the south property line in the Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero
feet (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the east property line in the Office District
from 10 feet to 7.3 feet (to building) and from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, under the provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a
10-lot subdivision.
Proposed Use: Mixed use
Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761
2544 Frisco Drive
TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net
Neighborhood Harbor Oaks Association
Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33756
301 Druid Rd. West
TELEPHONE: 727-447-8081, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email
Presenter: Wayne Wells, Planner Ill
Attendees Included: City Staff: Wayne Wells, Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Lenny Rickart
Applicant/Rep: Scott Lincoln,
The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments:
General Engineering:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 39
ma o nhole is located in Magnolia Drive 150 east Whole in S. Ft. Harrison
A sanitary sewer
Ave. where proposed force main tap is to be made. Revise plan to show f.m. connection to
manhole in Magnolia Drive.
2. Delete sheets 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12. Resubmit these sheets for building permit review.
3. Retention pond cannot be located on a separate lot. Combine Tracts A and B.
4. Provide a copy of a recorded cross-access agreement with property owner to north. Cross
access agreement shall be binding upon successors in title to the properties.
5. Words "City of Clearwater" shall not be on any privately owned manhole covers.
6. Preliminary Plat: Provide property owner address and telephone on the preliminary plat and
reference the section, township and range in which the property is located.
7. Bring all substandard sidewalks and sidewalk ramps adjacent to or a part of the project up to
standard, including A.D.A. (Truncated domes per D.O.T. Index #304.)
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
8. A sidewalk is proposed along Magnolia Drive in front of property not owned by applicant. Will
proposed sidewalk, (not a driving surface), interfere with access to property owned by other(s)?
The following to be addressed prior to building permit:
1. Final plat must be recorded with Pinellas County prior to a Building Permit being issued for
any vertical construction (Development Code 4-708).
General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments
may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application.
Environmental:
1 . Pond Cross-section indicates pond is existing, however, current City Standards prohibit vertical
walls in retention ponds that are located along the boundaries of adjacent parcels of land. Please
revise.
Fire:
I . ***PLEASE NOTE*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORITY HAVING
JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION.
2. Entrance on Fort Harrison SHALL be 24 foot in width
3 . Show location of fire hydrant for fire fighting use. Must be within 300' of building access as
hose lays. PRIOR TO CDB
4. Provide and show on the plan minimum 30' turning radius for emergency vehicle ingress and
egress at all entrance and exits. PRIOR TO CDB.
5 . A fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 or 13R in Town Houses is required .
PRIOR TO CDB
6. Is New Office Building to be Sprinklered ?
7 . Show Individual Riser Locations for each Town House. ACKNOWLEDGE PRIOR TO CDB
8 . No Unprotected openings within 10' of Exit Stair in accordance with NFPA 101, 2003 Edition.
PRIOR TO PERMIT
9. Dumpster must be 10' from building. PRIOR TO CDB
10. Show Fire Mains for each Town Home. PRIOR TO CDB
Harbor Master:
1 . No issues.
Legal:
I . No issues.
Land Resources:
I . No Issues.
Landscaping:
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 40
1 . As part of the Comprehensive Landscape Program application, indr• all landscape
requirements (including buffers) requested to be waived or modified. Provide the justification
for each reduction requested.
2 . Unclear how the shaded area indicating "interior green area" close to the bottom of the retention
pond will meet the requirements of Section 3-1202.E.I Code for landscaping materials within
the interior green area (since it could be wet).
3 . Site lighting on light poles shown on Sheet 4 conflicts with landscaping, especially trees, shown
on Sheet L-1. Trees will grow and shield out the lights, thus voiding any benefits anticipated by
site lighting. Then the owners will want to trim or remove the trees. To avoid this future
scenario, relocate light poles out of the landscape islands.
4. Ensure those areas indicated as "interior landscaping" can actually meet the landscape material
requirements of the Code, especially for trees. One examle is the island with the lift station that
appears suspect of not being able to meet the requirements.
Parks and Recreation:
1 . Open Space/Recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if
applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that
you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment.
Stormwater:
Before Building Permit
1) Dry ponds are required to draw down in 24 hours or less.
Solid Waste:
1 . That dumpster enclousure needs to be built to City code.
Allow 120 footprint for recycling carts for townhomes or will townhomes be on black
barrel/yellow bin service?
Traffic Engineering:
1 . 1. Remove monument sign from within sight visibility triangle.
2. Show geometric features East of the property i.e. is there a roadway or property that the road
connects to, or is it a dead end? If it is a dead end, show end of roadway markers.
3. Roadway width must meet the City's Fire Department requirements.
4. Show that a vehicle can back out of garage without impairing motorist's sight visibility
especially adjacent to a pedestrian pathway.
5. Minimum required width of Drive Aisle to Ft. Harrison is 24-feet; plan shows only 22-feet.
6. Per Community Development Code Sec. 3-904 (A), sight visibility triangles are to be
measured from property lines, not back of curb. Objects must not encroach in sight visibilty
triangles unless they meet the height limitations i.e. building inside sight triangle may be
problematic.
7. Show an accessible path from public sidewalk to proposed office building's accessible
"entrance".
All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB.
Planning:
General note: Comply with the current Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance and fee schedule.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 41
1 . 8/14/05 - WW • •
Indicate the second 7" oak tree from the south property line to also be removed.
8/8/05 - WW
Indicate on Sheet 3 and Sheet L-1 all trees proposed to be removed.
2 . Revise the required office parking on Sheet 1 from 25 spaces to 23 spaces.
3 . Provide the dimension from the front property line along Magnolia Drive to the edge of pavement
on the west side of the driveway.
4. Sheet 4 - Revise the visibility triangles on S. Ft. Harrison to the property line from the pavement
line.
5 . At the east end of the cross access on the north side, is there adequate turning movements for fire
truck to not only access the subject property but also the property to the north? With the
proposed landscape island at this east end of the cross access, how does the location of this
landscape island affect access to and/or actual parking layout on the parking for the property to
the north? Show parking layout for the parking lot to the north and revise this proposed parking
lot appropriately to avoid impacts on vehicular turning movements and access.
6. Access to the southwesternmost townhome is via the drive aisle, no sidewalk access (all other
units have sidewalk access)?
7. Building Code requires a stoop/landing at the end (ground floor) of the open stairs on the north
side of the office building. Show on all appropriate sheets.
8 . Demonstrate compliance with Building Code requirements for the south side of the office
building for the percentage of openings allowed, based on the closeness of the proposed building
to the property line, as well as the building to the south being at a 2.8-foot setback to the common
property line.
Also, demonstrate compliance with Building Code requirements for location of windows with
respect to the required egress stairs on the north side of the building.
9 . Provide the dimension from the face of the building to the edge for the roof overhang on the
elevations for the office building.
10. Site plan indicates an eight-foot wide sidewalk from the public sidewalk within the Ft. Harrison
right-of-way to the front of the building. However, neither the floor plan for the ground floor of
this building nor the west elevation provides any entrance on the west side of this building.
Revise the site plan sheets, or the floor plan and west building elevation.
11 . Unclear why the site plans indicate a sidewalk is to be installed within the Magnolia Drive ROW
for the frontage of an adjacent property owner (909 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue) and the construction
of a H/C ramp on S. Ft. Harrison at the intersection (in front of Jannelli's property). This is Dr.
Jannelli's parking lot, with parking spaces out in the ROW of Magnolia Drive.
12 . Unclear as to why crosswalks at the west side of the townhomes, along with the little piece of
sidewalk within the landscape island, are being installed. Advise/revise.
13 . Sheet 4 - Sign on Magnolia Drive must meet a five-foot setback to property lines.
14. Any freestanding signage proposed for the office building? If so, show the location and setback
on Sheets 4 and L-1.
15 . Sheet 4, 4B, 5, 6 and L-1 are inconsistent with the floor plans (ground and second) for the office
for the east side of the building, as there is building and concrete covering most of the interior
green area shown at this building entrance. Revise all appropriate sheets.
16. Observation: The northwesternmost unit, with the front door on the west side of the unit, does not
seem very desirable due to the dumpster location (which one must walk past to get to the front
door).
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 42
17. Based on a Mixed Use calculation with a 5,652 square-foot office bu cIng, only a maximum of
eight dwellings is permitted on this property (nine proposed). Cannot round up, per Section
3-902.D. Reduce by one dwelling unit.
Mixed Use Calculation for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum density = 24
du/acre) and Office District (maximum FAR = 0.50 and maximum density = 15 du/acre)
1. Project area"LL"GGLLGG?GG?GGG?G?? 36,040 sf
2. Land area zoned Commercial Districtuuuuuu? 10,184 sf
3. Permitted FAR in Commercial Distric.ta"""""..?0.55
4. Floor area permitted in Commercial DistrictU"?U " 5,601 sf
5. Land area zoned Office District?"Zii a"""? ..25,856 sf
6. Permitted FAR in Office District???????U"""? 0.50
7. Floor area permitted in Office DistricQu""" u. 12,928 sf
8. Floor area proposedZZ?Z?ZZ?ZZU?ZZZZ?Z" 5,652 sf
9. Permitted FAR in Commercial District 5,601 sf
10. Subtract #9 from #8 (floor area attributable to Office District?a" 52 sf
11. Land area attributable in Office District (#10 divided by #6)a" = 102 sf
12. Land area available in Office District for attached dwellings
(#5 minus #11) U"G Ui,""GLLa" "25,754 sf
13. Land area in an acre GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG- 43,560 sf
14. Lot acreage for attached dwellings (#12 divided by #13)...0.591 acres
15. Multiply lot acreage 0.591 acres
16. Maximum density in Office DistricQ.a"U"La .x 15 du/acre
17. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted = 8 du
18 . Coordinate the location and number of windows and doors on the first and second floors with that
depicted on the office building elevations (currently inconsistent).
19. Code requires underground electric and communication lines on-site.
20. Sheet 3 - Remove the sidewalk connector in the S. Ft. Harrison Avenue ROW between the public
sidewalk and the roadway curb.
21 . Potential condition to be included in Staff Report:
That a cross-access easement be recorded, upon request of the Planning Department, with the
property to the south.
22 . Revise your "Requested Deviations" to that listed by Staff above. (Note: There is no parking
reduction requested).
23 . Today the property is developed with a 6,486 square-foot office building (square footage has
probably not been calculated per the definition of gross floor area) with a parking lot that is at a
zero setback to property lines and the eastern portion vacant.
The proposal removes the one-story office building to construct a two-story office building,
essentially at the same setbacks and square footage as presently, with a parking lot at a zero
setback to property lines, with townhomes introduced (at requested reduced setbacks).
Other than a redeveloped site with more on the site and a new office building, Staff is unclear
what benefit the City is receiving. The Community Development Code is a performance based
Code, where there is supposed to be improvements OVER THAT EXISTING to the site through
redevelopment. Mixed use criteria calls for an improved site plan, landscaping in excess of the
mimimum, improved design and appearance and more efficient parking. Unclear how these
criteria are being achieved through this proposal. Additionally, due to the number and nature of
the reductions being sought, and the design such produces, it appears that the site is being
overdeveloped.
24 . General Appplicability criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this
development be "in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent
properties."
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 43
25 . General Appplicabili criteria #5 response: Provide specific examples of HOW this proposal is
"consistent with the community character of the surrounding area."
26, Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #1 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and
development standards."
27 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #4 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal is "compatible with adjacent land uses."
28 . Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #6 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal will "upgrade the immediate vicinity," especially in light of all of the
reductions and deviations requested.
29. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #7 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW this proposal "creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the
immediate vicinity" and for "the City of Clearwater as a whole."
30. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria #8 response: Provide specific examples of
HOW "flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks and height are justified by the benefits
to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and
the City of Clearwater as a whole."
31 . Revise the Project Narrative to match the square footage of the office building proposed on the
site plan Sheet 1, as well as the number of parking spaces required/provided for the office
building. Otherwise revise according to the request as outlined by Staff above.
32 . Sheet 4A - Either add onto each lot or in a table on the sheet the square footage for all lots.
33 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations
submitted to, or as modified by, the CDB;
34. Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That, prior to the issuance of any permits, either a Unity of Title or a Final Plat be recorded in the
public records;
35 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That future signage meet the requirements of the Code and any future freestanding signs be a
monument-style sign, designed to match the exterior materials and color of the building;
36 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all Parks and Recreation fees be paid prior to the issuance of any permits;
37 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all Fire Department requirements be met prior to the issuance of any permits;
38 . Potential condition to be included in the Staff Report:
That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed buildings) be placed
underground, including outdoor lighting lines;
39. Show the location of electric poles to be retained on-site and/or overhead power and
communication lines for adjacent parcels that will continue to traverse the site to determine
conflicts with proposed improvements, especially parking and landscaping.
40. Based on the location of the outside condensing units indicated on the south and west elevations,
unclear if this proposed location of the a/c units is limited to that area shown or if there is
additional flat roof for the rest of the building, and potentially on both sides of the cupola.
Unclear as to roof structure, as to what is flat versus pitched. Suggest submitting a roof plan to
assist. Reason for such request is to determine where building height will be measured to and
what height will be advertised.
41 . Sheet 4 indicates a two-foot overhang at the rear of the townhomes and indentations where the a/c
units are located. However, based on the elevations submitted, I do not see any two-foot
overhangs (assumed to be outside walls of the second/third floors) nor the indentations in the
locations as indicated on Sheet 4. Clarify and/or coordinate site and building elevations.
42. Show on Sheet 4 and L-1 the balconies indicated on the elevations, including the distance from
the face of the building to the edge of the balconies.
43 . Building elevations submitted is for the four-unit townhome building. Correct the elevations
according to which direction they face, as the south is actually north, north is actually south...
44. Sheet 4 - show the location of garage doors for all units.
45 . It is assumed, since floor plans were not submitted for the townhomes, that the end units with
access to the side of the unit (east or west side of the building) will also have stairs similar to the
interior units shown, but that those stairs are internal to the unit. Advise.
46 . Rear of townhomes appears as a three-story mass of building, with no indentations or other
features (such as balconies) to break up the solid mass of this side of the building. Of concern is
the southern townhome building, as the rear of this building faces Magnolia Drive.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 44
47 . Provide on the buil Ring elevations the overall length and depth of the ?t ilding (for both
buildings). Ensure that these dimensions match that indicated on Sheet 4. Currently, Sheet 4
indicates a building depth of 40 feet with a two-foot overhang, yet the building elevation scales at
42 feet on the ground level. Sheet 4 also indicates a building length of 100.67 feet, whereas the
elevation for the four-unit townhome building scales to 99.5 feet in length.
48 . Proposed garage doors for the townhomes - Do the door lift vertically or do they pivot, opening
over the adjacent sidewalk. If the latter, this would appear to be a problem for pedestrians
walking adjacent to an opening garage door that would hit them. Advise.
Other:
No Comments
Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by noon on 9/30/05 for review by
DRC on 11/3/05.
Development Review Agenda - Thursday, September 1, 2005 - Page 45
0 0
8/25/05
Mixed Use Calculation for 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Property is zoned Commercial District (maximum FAR = 0.55 and maximum
density = 24 du/acre) and Office District (maximum FAR = 0.50 and maximum
density = 15 du/acre)
1. Project area ......................................................................36,040 sf
2. Land area zoned Commercial District ....................................... 10,184 sf
3. Permitted FAR in Commercial District .........................................0.55
4. Floor area permitted in Commercial District ................................. 5,601 sf
5. Land area zoned Office District ...............................................25,856 sf
6. Permitted FAR in Office District ................................................0.50
7. Floor area permitted in Office District ........................................12,928 sf
8. Floor area proposed ............................................................... 5,652 sf
9. Permitted FAR in Commercial District #4 .................................... 5,601 sf
10. Subtract #9 from #8 (floor area attributable to Office District ..................52 sf
11. Land area attributable in Office District (#10 divided by #6) ...............= 102 sf
12. Land area available in Office District for attached dwellings
(#5 minus #11) ..................................................................25,754 sf
13. Land area in an acre .........................................................= 43,560 sf
14. Lot acreage for attached dwellings .........................................= 0.591 acres
15. Multiply lot acreage (14) ...................................................... 1.526 acres
16. Maximum density in Office District .........................................x 15 du/acre
17. Maximum number of dwelling units permitted ............................ = 8 du
0 0
Wells, Wayne
From: Scott Lincoln [slincoln@LACivil.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 10:35 AM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Andrew Hupp
Subject: RE: FLD2005-0704, 907 S. Ft: Harrison Avenue
Wayne
1. Can we get a few more days to get this info on the Plans. Tomorrow
at 4 PM is to tight.
2. Why do we need a parking
office uses and demonstrate
3. Why do we need a loading
4. Can we get some addition,
We need to stay on this CDB
we can assure this.
study? Can my client explain the proposed
no addition parking needs?
zone for office?
a1 time on the Preliminary Plat?
cycle if at all possible. Let me know how
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com [mailto:Wayne.Wells@myClearwater.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 9:27 AM
To: Scott Lincoln
Subject: FLD2005-0704, 907 S. Ft. Harrison Avenue
Scott -
Attached is the Letter of Incompleteness for the above referenced
project. The original will be mailed. I will fax this letter also.
Wayne
<<letter of incompleteness 8.8.05.pdf>>
1
P*vision of Corporations 16
Page 1 of 2
Y 1 a ` ? • t
Vr?'4. IdZ I,CU'°
Florida Limited Liability
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY, LLC
PRINCIPAL ADDRESS
607 W. BAY STREET
TAMPA FL 33606
MAILING ADDRESS
607 W. BAY STREET
TAMPA FL 33606
Document Number FEI Number Date Filed
L02000018164 050522603 07/18/2002
State Status Effective Date
FL ACTIVE NONE
Total Contribution
0.00
T 1 A
IN,C ,15i LCI CU L'1, V,Glll.
Name & Address
HUPP, ANDREW J
607 W. BAY ST.
TAMPA FL 33606
Name Changed: 04/19/2004
Address Changed: 04/19/2004
Manager/Member Detail
Name & Address Title
BRACIAK, BRETT A
800 ISLAND WAY MGRM
CLEARWATER FL 33767
HUPP, ANDREW J
607 W. BAY STREET MGRM
TAMPA FL 33606
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al =DETFIL&n1=L02000018164&n2=NAMFWD... 8/7/2005
Division of Corporations 10 0 Page 2 of 2
Annual Reports
Report Year Filed Date
2003 04/03/2003
2004 04/ 19/2004
2005 04/04/2005
Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing
No Events
No Name History Information
Document Images
Listed below are the images available for this filing.
04/04/2005 -- ANN REWUNIFORM BUS REP
04/19/2004 -- ANN REPILNIFORM BUS REP
04/03/2003 -- ANN REP/UNIFORM BUS REP
07/18/2002 -- Florida Limited Liabilites
THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT
;,Corporations Inquiry
Corporations Help
http://www. sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&n 1=LO2000018164&n2=NAMFW'D... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property Applif r Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 06 Page 2 of 5
15 / 29 / 15 / 54450 / 033 / 0040
07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 21:44:05
Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY OBK: 12138 OPG; 1514
907 S FT HARRISON AVE # 102
CLEARWATER FL 33756-3903
EVAC: Non-EVAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 907 S FT HARRISON AVE
of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract; 259.02
sales from 2002 - 2003;
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 8 /2,002 12,13811,514 100,000 (U) I
1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- 8 /2,000 11,01612,276 50,000 (U) I
1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- 1 /1,992 7,797/1,246 18,700 (U) I
0000; Book Pgs - 0 /0 O/ 0 0 { )
2004 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market; 171,800 Homestead; NO Ownership % .000
Govt Exem; NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 171,800 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable; 171,800 Agricultural; 0
2004 Tax Information
District: CW Seawall: Frontage;
Clearwater view:
04 Millage; 22.9694 Land Size U nit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes; 3,946.14
1) 80 x 215 12. 00 8,954. 00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 7.00 9,142.00 S
3) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3,946.14 6) 0 x 0 00 00
Without any exemptions,
2004 taxes will be ;
3,946.14
Short Legal MAGNOLIA PARK BLK 33, (L EASE SEPT 2061
Description OR BK 5482 PG 1499) LOT 4 & N 25.5FT OF W 104FT OF L
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l&a=l&b=l&c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property App*r Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0 Page 3 of 5
Pro erty and Land Use Code descriptions
15 / 29 / 15 / 54450 / 033 ? 0040 :01
07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 21:44:05
Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Offices
Property Address: 907 S FT HARRISON AUE Prop Use: 330 Land Use: 17
S?ruc?ural E1em?nts
Foundation Continuous Footing
Floor System Slab on Grade
Exterior Wall Concrete Block
Height Factor 0
Party Wall Hone
Structural Frame Masonry Pillar&Steel
Roof Frame Flat
Roof Cover Built Up/Composition
Cabinet & Mill Average
Floor Finish Carpet Combination
Interior Finish Drywall
Total Units 0
Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg
Fixtures 12
Bath Tile Hone
Electric Average
Shape Factor Rectangle
Quality Average
Year Built 11950
Effective Age 55
Other Depreciation Z5
Function Depreciation 0
Economic Depreciation 0
Sub Ar4a as
Description Factor Area Description Factor Area
1) Base Area 1.00 6,424 7) .00 0
2) Canopy 25 60 8) 00 0
3) 00 0 9) 00 0
4) 00 0 10) 00 0
5) 00 0 11) 00 0
6) 00 0 12) 00 0
Commercial Extra F?atures
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) ASPHALT 8000SF 1.50 81000 12,000 12,000 999
2) 00 0 0 0 0
3) .00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
6) .00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 12,000
Map With Property Address (non-y.acant)
-4f R
F+- I F3+1 TR ID-, RIE?
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &i=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property Appj$er Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0
I?.Sh?'?I NE ,?A?hv?ii h•dE
WAY 1+1A.'i' H 'PRISON
4:EJF"To
JA,,,,t
d
g_S
9 1 ri 0(1
NO A% L 14. FT
DR PRISON
4 I A 10O
LriTI US ? L0TU FT
PATH PATH , ppj,' ,aN
I +1
0
1001
FT 507
HAPRI SON MAGNOL I
vE
HARR1 ON
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
I Cl,4'
Page 4of5
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
B ack._toSearch_.;Page
An explanation of this screen
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
P}nellas County Property App0r Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 004, Page 2 of 5
15 / 29 / 15 / 54450 / 033 / 0080
07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 21:44:42
Ownership Information Vacant Property Use and Sales
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY O BK: 12138 OPG: 1522
907 S FORT HARRISON AUE # 102
CLEARWATER FL 33606-2703
EVAC: Non-EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 0
of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 259.02
2002
2003
l
f
-
:
sa
es
rom
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 8 /2,002 12,138/1,522 150,000 (U) U
1914: Book 003 Pgs 043- 1 /1,981 5,134/1,226 130,000 (0) I
1913: Book 001 Pgs 070- 0 /1,976 4,429/1,702 96,600 (Q) U
0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,971 3,645/ 339 3,000 (Q) I
2004 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 53,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000
Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 53,000 Institutional Exem; NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem: 0
Taxable: 53,000 Agricultural: 0
2004 Tax Information
District: CW Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater view:
04 Millage; 22.9694 Land Size U nit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes: 1,217.38
1) 71 x 135 7. 00 91585. 00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 .00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00
cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1,217.38 6) 0 x 0 00 00
Without any exemptions:
2004 taxes will be
1,217.38
Short Legal MAGNOLIA PARK BLK 33, E 112 OF LOT 7
Description AND LOT 8 L
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 06
15 / 29 I 15 / 54450 / 033 / 0080
Page 3 of 5
07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 21:44:43
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: i0
Vacant Extra F(-- a-tur(-- E;
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) 00 0 0 0 0
3) 00 0 0 0 0
4) .00 0 0 0 0
5) .00 0 0 0 0
5) 00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
®0041 Fq ?
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l&a=l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property App r Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0?
IE F FT
?F-T
?RIS0N
3Ub
FT
?ISON
106
-T I
•T
'I }pity
1000
FT
'RI S!:
I040
FT
'AFRiSCIN
r
0
l?
L Lf?,
D
0
0
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
Page 4 of 5
FII
l
j
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property Appoer Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0 Page 5 of 5
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property App ' r Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0 Page 2 of 5
it 6
10 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 440 / 0120
07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 21:45:09
Ownership Information Uacant Property Use and Sales
B K B PROPERTIES INC O BK: 13366 OPG: 0001
800 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33767-1825
EVAC: Mon-EUAC
Comparable sales value as Prop Addr; 0
of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 259.02
l
f
2002 - 2003
es
rom
sa
:
0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp
Plat Information 2 /2,004 13,3661 1 40,000 (Q) U
0000; Book Pgs - 9 /2,000 11,03611,252 278,000 (M) U
0000; Book Pgs - 8 /1,990 7,34312,096 250,000 (M) U
0000: Book Pgs - 10/1,987 6,5931 581 190,000 (M) U
2004 Value EXEMPTIONS
Just/Market: 46,900 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000
Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000
Assessed/Cap: 46,900 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000
Historic Exem; 0
Taxable; 46,900 Agricultural; 0
2004 Tax Information
District: CU Seawall: Frontage:
Clearwater View:
04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size U nit Land Land Land
Front x Depth Price Units Meth
04 Taxes; 1,077.26
1) 64 x 135 7. 00 8,484. 00 S
Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00
3) 0 x 0 00 .00
Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 00 00
cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00
1,077.26 6) 0 x 0 00 00
Without any exemptions,
2004 taxes will be ;
1,077.26
Short Legal FORMER RR R/W LYING W OF LOT 24 BLK 32 & E OF LOT 8
Description BLK 33 OF MAGNOLIA PARK SUB L
Building Information
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l &a=1 &b=l &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 06
10 / 29 / 15 / 00000 / 440 / 0120
Page 3 of 5
07-Aug-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas COunty Property Appraiser 21:45:08
Vacant Parcel Property Use: 000 Land Use: 10
Vacant Extra F?a?ures
Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year
1) .00 0 0 0 0
2) 00 0 0 0 0
3) 00 0 0 0 0
4) 00 0 0 0 0
5) 00 0 0 0 0
6) 00 0 0 0 0
TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0
Map With Property Address (non-vacant)
F*_1 141 j ] ® Fq_1 FID--1
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 15 29 15 54450 033 0 Page 4 of 5
T
r 0tN
?F+I
T?
St?J
D
ION
1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002)
O
http://pao.co.pineHas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-click?o=l &a= l &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p... 8/7/2005
-V?A
CITY OF CLEARWATER
' NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS
1
The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public
hearings on Tuesday, December 20, 2005, beginning at 2:00 p.m., in the City Council
Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the
following requests:
NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the
meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property
owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the
beginning of the meeting.
1. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26
LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an
automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east) setback
from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft
to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign); reductions to the side (south) setback
from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west)
setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking
from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a
deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to
allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major
arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-
704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along South Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft
(to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer
width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape
buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft
(to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a
nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the
foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the
interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a
Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit
non-residential off-street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a
deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project,
under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470,
& 1480 S Missouri Ave, , A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots
7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039
2. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) Patrick E & Toni V Hickey are requesting Flexible Development
approval to permit a doctor's office in the Office (O) District with a reduction to the minimum lot
width of 100 ft to 64.08 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 16 ft (to
pavement), reductions to the side (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.7 ft (to existing building), from
20 ft to 1-ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and reductions to the side (south)
setback from 20 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing building), from 20 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft
to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Sec 2-1004.13, and reductions to the landscape buffer along the north property line from 12 ft to
10.7 ft (to existing building), from 12 ft to 1-ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk),
reductions to the landscape buffer along the south property line from 12 ft to 7.1 ft (to existing
building), from 12 ft to 9.7 ft (to pavement) and from 12 ft to 7.3 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction
to foundation landscaping from 5 ft to zero ft, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
• 0
provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Doctor's office) at 107 McMullen Booth Rd, Sec
16-29-16, M&B 21.05. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-
07077
3. (Cont'd from 10-18-05) Lenny Cristino is requesting Flexible Development approval to
permit the expansion of a restaurant with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 96 ft, reductions
to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing outdoor seating deck), from 25 ft to 22 ft
(to canopy), and from 25 ft to 9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft
to 5.8 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to
existing pavement), reductions of the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 14.3 ft (to building), from
20 ft to 4 ft (to existing pavement) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure) and a
reduction of parking spaces from 43 spaces to 9 spaces, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.M, and
a reduction to the front (west) landscape buffer from 15 ft to 9 ft (along S Ft Harrison Ave), and a
reduction to the rear (east) landscape buffer from 5 ft to zero ft (to dumpster enclosure), as part of
a Comprehensive Landscape Program under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use:
Restaurant) at 1101 S Ft Harrison Ave Magnolia Park Blk 39, Lot 1, parts of Lot 2 & Vac Lotus
Path Adj on N. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06053
4. (Cont'd from 11-15-05) Peter Pan Developments LLC (Panayiotis Vasiloudes, Petrit Meroli,
Somerset Condominium) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 8 attached
dwellings in the Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) District with a reduction to the
minimum lot area from 15,000 sq ft to 13,087 sq ft, reductions to the minimum lot width from
150 ft to 120 ft along Bay Esplanade and from 150 ft to 110 ft along Somerset St, a reduction to
the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 22 ft (to water feature), reductions to the front (south)
setback from 25 ft to 11 ft (to building and pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging
area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the
side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to
46.83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 4.17 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and to
permit the building within the visibility triangles, as a Residential Infill Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along Bay Esplanade from 5 ft
to 3 ft (for the retention pond planting area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along Somerset
St from 10 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the
north property line from 10 ft to 3.1 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Plan, under
the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (8 condominiums)] at 693-
699 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 76 & unplatted Blk 76. Assigned
Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-08090
5. Clearwater Townhomes Inc (Roland Rogers) are requesting (1) Flexible Development
approval to permit the addition of a pool to a previously approved attached dwelling project
(FLD2002-11042, approved January 21, 2003) in the Tourist District with a reduction to the rear
(east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment
Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval revising the
previously recorded plat to provide for the proposed pool (PLT2005-00026). (Proposed Use:
Addition of pool to townhomes) at 161 Brightwater Dr, Island Townhomes, Lots 1-10.
Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09095/PLT2005-00026
6. Carlouel Yacht Corp. is requesting Flexible Development approval for the expansion of an
existing commercial dock (10' x 107' floating dock addition to an existing 10' x 250' floating dock
for transient vessel mooring), with a reduction in side (north) setback from 226.13 ft to 3.3 ft,
under the provisions of Sec 3-601. (Proposed Use: Expansion of an existing commercial dock)
• w
at 1091 Eldorado Ave, Mandalay Replat Blk 171, Lots 6-11 & part of Lots 4 & 5. Assigned
Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09094
7. Miriam L Cebula, & Harley P and Sharon R Evans (GFB Development, LLC) are
requesting Flexible Development approval to permit 27 attached dwelling units in the High
Density Residential (HDR) District with an increase to ht from 30 ft to 79 ft (to roof deck) with
an increase to the ht of the parapet from 30 inches to 90 inches (from roof deck), a reduction to
the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 21 ft (to building) and 12 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the
rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from
10 ft to 3 ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to
building) and 8 ft (to pavement) as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec
2-504.F. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 125 & 143 Island Way, Island Estates of
Clearwater, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07062
8. Georgia Street Properties LLC, 302-308 N Osceola Properties LLC, Belvedere Land
Trust, Church of Scientology Flag Svc Org Inc, Osceola-Jones Properties LLC, & Triangle
S A Land LLC (Triangle Old Bay Holdings, LLC, Triangle Development Company LLC) are
requesting Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed-use development (324 attached
dwelling units and 26,124 sq ft of non-residential floor area), an increase in the permitted ht from
30 ft to 169 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 28 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof
deck) for that portion of the development on the west side of N Osceola Ave, an additional 21 ft
(from roof deck) for architectural embellishments for that portion of the development on the east
side of N Osceola Ave as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of
Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use) at 302, 303, 304, 308 and 309 North Osceola Ave;
410 Jones St; and 410 N Ft Harrison Ave, A. B. & Jennie Cate's Sub Lots 1-7 & Vac Alley
Betw & Bergen's Repl Blk A-B & Vac Alley, Lots 8-11 & Subm Land, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43-
03, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43.04, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43-05, Sec 09-29-15, M&B 43-06, Clovis C
Lutz Sub Tract A-B, Subm Land, & 10 Ft Strip of Land Adj N of Tract A, Belvedere Apts Co-op
Apt 2 A, Jones' Sub of Nicholson's Blk 2, part of Lots 1-2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft,
Planner III. FLD2005-09098
9. Flamingo Bay of Clearwater, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to
permit 27 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (south) setback
from 15 ft to 2.27 ft (to sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to
the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck and
boardwalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 45.67 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 5.5
ft for parapets (from roof deck) and with an additional 16 ft for a roof top pavilion (from roof
deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-
803.C (retaining 5 existing boat docks for sole use by the property owners); and (2) the Transfer
of Development Rights for 2 units from 28 Idlewild St and 2 units from 321 Coronado Dr, under
the provisions of Sec 4-1403 (TDR2005-09027). [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (27
condominiums)] at 170, 174, 180, & 188 Brightwater Dr, Bayside Sub No.2, Lots 36-40.
Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-09101/TDR2005-09027
10. LaBella Vista of Clearwater, LLC is requesting (1) Flexible Development approval to
permit 18 attached dwellings in the Tourist District with reductions to the front (north) setback
from 15 ft to 10.8 ft (to building) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to sidewalk and dumpster staging
area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 7 ft (to pavement and wall), reductions to
the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.8 ft (to building) and from 10 ft to 7 ft (to pavement and
wall), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building) and from 20 ft to zero
ft (to pool deck and boardwalk) and increases to building ht from 35 ft to 45.67 (to roof deck)
with an additional 5.5 ft for parapets (from roof deck) and with an additional 14.25 ft for a roof
top pavilion (from roof deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the
provisions of Sec 2-803.C (retaining three existing boat docks for sole use by the property
owners); and (2) the Transfer of Development Rights for 3 units from 200 Brightwater Dr, under
the provisions of Sec 4-1403 (TDR2005-09026). (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [18
condominiums]) at 193, 199, & 201 Brightwater Dr, Bayside Sub No. 2, Lots 24 & 25, and part
of Lots 23 & 26. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-
09102/TDR2005-09026
11. Shaul & Meir Lew Partnership (C/O L&L Wings Inc.) are requesting a Flexible
Development approval (FLS2003-09046) for redevelopment of an existing retail sales
establishment and includes a reduction to front (south along Marianne St) setback from 25 ft to
10.75 ft (to building) and a reduction to front (south along Marianne St) setback from 25 ft to
zero ft (to pavement), per Sec 2-803.K. (Proposed Use: Remodel of existing Retail Sales Store)
at 400 Poinsettia Ave, Barbour-Morrow Sub, Blk A, Lots 29-33 Incl. Assigned Planner: John
Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-09096
12. Parkdale, LLC (Maria Nikolova & Belleair Harbor, LLC) are requesting a Flexible
Development approval to construct a 2 unit attached dwelling building in the Tourist Marina
Residential District and includes a minimum lot area reduction from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a
minimum lot width reduction from 100 ft to 60 ft, the rear, waterfront (east) setback from 20 ft to
zero ft (to pool deck), and the rear, waterfront (east) setback from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), as a
Comprehensive Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: A 2 unit
attached dwelling) at 475 East Shore Dr Clearwater Beach Park, ls` Add Replat, Blk C, Lot 5 &
Submerged Land E to Channel. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-10105
13. Magnolia Park Realty & BKB Properties Inc. are requesting a (1) Flexible Development
to permit a Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached dwellings in the
Commercial and Office Districts with a reduction to the minimum lot width in the Commercial
District from 100 feet to 79.5 feet, a reduction to the front (west) setback in the Commercial
District from 25 feet to 10 feet (to building), reductions to the front (south) setback in the Office
District from 35 feet to 8.18 feet (to building) and from 35 feet to 16.34 feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the side (north) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to zero feet (to
pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 8.02 feet
(to building), reductions to the side (south) setback in the Commercial District from 10 feet to
seven feet (to building), from 10 feet to four feet (to pavement) and from 10 feet to three feet (to
sidewalk), a reduction to the side (south) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to zero feet
(to pavement), a reduction to the side (west) in the Office District from 20 feet to one foot (to
pavement), reductions to the side (east) setback in the Office District from 20 feet to 7.3 feet (to
building), from 20 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and from 20 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), an
increase to building height for offices in the Commercial District from 25 feet to 31 feet (to flat
roof), an increase to building height for townhomes in the Office District from 30 feet to 37.5 feet
(to midpoint of roof) and to permit buildings within the visibility triangles, as a Comprehensive
Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sections 2-704.17 and 2-1004.13, and a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line along South Ft. Harrison Avenue
from 15 feet to 10 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south property
line along Magnolia Drive from 10 feet to 8.18 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape
buffer along the north property line in the Commercial District from five feet to zero feet (to
pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north property line in the Office District
from 10 feet to 8.02 feet (to building), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south
?tl vJ •
property line in the Commercial and Office Districts from five feet to zero feet (to pavement), a
reduction to the landscape buffer along the west property line in the Office District from 10 feet
to one foot (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the east property line in
the Office District from 10. feet to 7.3 feet (to building), from 10 feet to 5.4 feet (to pavement) and
from 10 feet to 4.2 feet (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the
provisions of Section 3-1202.G; and (2) Preliminary Plat approval for a 10-lot subdivision.
(Proposed Use: Mixed Use of offices (5,250 square feet) and nine attached dwellings.) at 907 S
Ft. Harrison Ave, Magnolia Park, Blk 33, Lots 4, & 7-8, and part of lots 5 & 6, and Sec 16-29-
15, M&B 44.01. Assigned Planner: -Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner 111. FLD2005-
07074/PLT2005=00027
Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or
objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides
to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at
such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony
and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community
Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial
cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party
status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine
witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and
obtained during the case discussion before the CDB.
An oath will be administered swearing in all persons-giving testimony in quasi-judicial public
hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and
spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB
shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the
Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes.
Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be
available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL
33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about
the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan.
Michael Delk Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC
Planning Director City Clerk
City of Clearwater
P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748
NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing.
A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST.
Ad: 12/04/05
670711
FLD2(1007074 = 70
1100 FT HARRISON LAND TRUST ASHRAF, BESSADA DMP PA
407 ST ANDREWS RD 3184 CRESCENT OAKS BLVD
BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 1935 TARPON SPRINGS FL 34688 - 7610
B K B PROPERTIES INC
800 ISLAND WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1825
BOTANICAL & HERBAL RESOURCES
805 S FT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901
C S M PROPERTIES PTNSHP
508 JEFFORDS ST # C
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3839
Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition
Doug Williams, President
2544 Frisco Drive
Clearwater, FL 33761
CRISTINO, LENNY
2161 75TH ST
BROOKLYN NY 11204 - 5952
DI VELLO FAMILY LLC
400 ISLAND WAY N # 703
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2134
F K M S
509 HARBOR DR
BELLEAIR BEACH FL 33786 - 3253
FOTIOU, ZACHARIAS
FOTIOU, MERCEDES
428 MAGNOLIA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838
BATT, HOWARD C
611 DRUID RD E # 712
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931
BROWN, ELLEN RAYNA LLC
2973 CIELO CIR S
CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1411
CARPENTER, JANA Q THE
612 HARBOR IS
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1801
CONKLIN, LESLIE M
CONKLIN, DEBRA S
430 LOTUS PATH
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832
DESAI, ANUP
DESAI, CHHAYA
908 S FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904
DRUHILL PROF CTR CONDO ASSN
DRUID RD
CLEARWATER FL 33756 -
FERRARA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS
611 DRUID RD E # 704
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939
GENDUSA, SAMUEL J
GENDUSA, JOY
414 MAGNOLIA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838
V.')?
AUSTIN MEDICAL CTR INC
3389 CLARINE WAY E
DUNEDIN FL 34698 - 9439
BAY REAL ESTATE INVESTORS
WEISS, MARY L THE
2040 NE COACHMAN RD
CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 2614
BROWN, KENNETH P
BROWN, BRENDA
423 MAGNOLIA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837
CLAY, CHRISTINE
424 LOTUS PATH
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832
CREDITIQ INC
611 DRUID RD E # 405
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3935
DEW, MICHELE B
433 DRUID RD W
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3854
DRUID ROAD
611 DRUID RD E STE 105
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948
FL DEPT OF TRANS
315 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165
HAKSAR, MANJULA
HAKSAR, ELIZABETH
424 MAGNOLIA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3838
Harbor Oaks Association HARBOR OAKS LLLP HARRITY, MICHELLE
Margaret Hightower 1501 S ARRAWANNA AVE 803 S FORT HARRISON AVE
301 Druid Road West TAMPA FL 33629 - 6101 CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901
Clearwater, FL 33756
HEMERICK, F DAVID
902 S FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3904
KEDAN, ELITE
2354 HADDON HALL PL
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510
LOTUS LAND
1055 S FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3905
MC QUIGG, MICHAEL C
MC QUIGG, EUGENIA F
429 MAGNOLIA DR
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3837
NACOL, T PATRICK
NACOL, BARBARA K
611 DRUID RD E # 711
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3931
PANTELIDES, GUS K
611 DRUID RD E # 705
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939
PERFECTLY BALANCED BOOKS INC
611 DRUID RD E # 401
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3920
PINELLAS COUNTY
315 COURT ST
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 5165
Scott Lincoln, PE
Steve Allen, PE
LA Civil, Inc.
1446 Court Street
Clearwater, FL 33756
•
HEYE, HANS F
611 DRUID RD E STE 200
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3946
KEDAN, ELLA THE
2354 HADDON HALL PL
CLEARWATER FL 33764 - 7510
MAGNOLIA MEDICAL CENTER LLC
PO BOX 30073
ALEXANDRIA VA 22310 - 8073
MINES, JONATHAN
MINES, CARLEN
505 DRUID RD E
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3909
PAGE, JOHN C
1001 S MYRTLE AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3968
PANTELIDES, GUS
611 DRUID RD E # 706
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3959
PHILLIPS, CRAIG S
PHILLIPS, PEGGY L
3716 MCKAY CREEK DR
LARGO FL 33770 - 4566
RODRIGUEZ, ROSALIA C
418 LEEWARD IS
CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2309
SHAMSAH, H SHIDI TRUST
611 DRUID RD E STE 301
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3919
•
JANNELLI, GILBERT G
909 S FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903
LINETSKY, LIDIA
LINETSKY, FELIX S
611 DRUID RD E # 302
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3919
MAGNOLIA PARK REALTY
907 S FT HARRISON AVE # 102
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903
MORTON PLANT HOSP ASSN INC
PO BOX 210
CLEARWATER FL 33757 - 0210
PANTELIDES, GUS K
611 DRUID RD # 703
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3939
PENNY, KENNETH E JR
GOSCIN-PENNY, LEE
4598 CLEARWATER HARBOR DR
LARGO FL 33770 -
PHILLIPS, CRAIG
PHILLIPS, PEGGY
611 DRUID RD E STE 105
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3948
SCHAEFER, JAMES O
SCHAEFER, NANCY E
430 JASMINE WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822
STEVENS, KAREN
424 JASMINE WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822
SUBRAMANIAN, ARUNACHALAM SUBRAMANIAN, ARUNACHALAM SZABO, BRUCE
SUBRAMANIAN, VALLI SUBRAMANIAN, VALLI 611 DRUID RD E STE 717
800 S FORT HARRISON AVE 8777 LAUREL DR CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3902 PINELLAS PARK FL 33782 - 4345
T G H INVESTMENTS INC
611 DRUID RD E STE 710
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3947
TURNER, GERALDINE C
801 S FORT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3901
WICKERSHAM, HERBERT F
WICKERSHAM, M ANN
428 LOTUS PATH
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3832
U
TEMME, R WAYNE
421 JASMINE WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3821
WAGSTAFF, MARY LOU
418 JASMINE WAY
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3822
•TULLY, JOE
TULLY, CYNTHIA
611 DRUID RD # 407
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3935
WAYLAND, ROBERT E
CHALACHE, NAJEH F
905 S FT HARRISON AVE
CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3903
Wells, Wayne
From: Greg Iglehart [gwiggy@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 4:38 PM
To: Wells, Wayne
Cc: Scott Doster
Subject: Proposed Mixed Use at 907 S. Ft. Harrison
Wayne,
I spoke to Andrew Hupp, the owner of the proposed mixed use project just
south of our Townhomes of Harbor Oaks. He is on board with adding trees in
the following places:
1. Live Oak trees (4" caliper) along Ft. Harrison between the sidewalk and
the pavement on 30ft centers. This will match the canopy street tree
program of our development and will be a nice long-term enhancement for that
part of Ft. Harrison. Hopefully, the city will require this of any new
redevelopment along Ft. Harrison in the future.
2. On the north side of the five-unit townhouse building that abuts our
southern property line, Andrew agreed to plant trees with a vertical
orientation such as Southern Red Cedar or Washingtonia Palms. The size of
the trees would need to be initially at least 12-14ft to screen the second
floor facade of that building. I don't know the exact number of trees, but
enough to soften the view from the north.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.
Greg Iglehart
Townhomes of Harbor Oaks, LLLP
1501 S. Arrawana Ave.
Tampa, FL 33629
813.258.5240 (o)
813.258.5241 (f)
1
El SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION
? SUBMIT 1 COPY OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including folded site plan
CASE #:
DATE RECEIVED:
RECEIVED BY (staff initials):
ATLAS PAGE #:
ZONING DISTRICT:
LAND USE CLASSIFICATION:
ZONING & LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF
ADJACENT PROPERTIES:
NORTH: /
SOUTH: /
WEST: /
EAST: /
COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
(Revised 9/19/2001)
D. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-1001)
APPLICANT NAME:
MAILING ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER: -19 Inc FAX NUMBER: /1 Q - Iq O
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
include ALL owners)
AGENT NAME: (Contact Person)
MAILINGADDRESS: 4 4(o L u d S+. C. oVI.I TLI?, FL J 3?"5lD
PHONE NUMBER: 1. 721 ) ? Q FAX NUMBER: (1.2-7 (? - 6 50
The landscaping requirements of Article 3 Division 12 may be waived or modified as a part of a Level One or
Level Two Approval, as the case may be, if the application for development approval includes a Comprehensive
Landscape Program, which satisfies the following criteria. The use of landscape plans; sectionslelevations,
renderings and perspectives may be necessary as supplementary information in addition to the information
provided on this worksheet:
1. Architectural Theme.
a. The landscaping in a Comprehensive Landscape Program shall be designed as a part of the architectural
theme of the principal buildings proposed or developed on the parcel proposed for the development.
p Planning and Development Services
????? ?? 100 South Myrtle Avenue
}' Clearwater, Florida 33756
/ Telephone: 727-562-4567
U Fax: 727-562-4576
`CAP LpXJ5=e is (n cori(pr-IL, lbw. local d_o yLloa cad
OR
b. The design, character, location and/or materials of the landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive
Landscape Program shall be demonstrably more attractive than landscaping otherwise permitted on the parcel
proposed for development under the minimum landscape standards.
2
3.
Lighting. Any lighting proposed as a part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program is automatically controlled so
that the lighting is turned off when the business is closed.
Community Character. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will
enhance the community character of the City of Clearwater.
4. Property Values. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape Program will have a
beneficial impact on the value of the property in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development.
5.
Please return checklist for review and verification.
6. That (fte), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct.
Property Ownet
Property Owner
STATE OF FLORIDA,
COUNTY OF PINELLAS
Before me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of the State of Florida, day of
this e??
l
5r personally appeared dLf"r _ ,0 who having been first duly sworn
De oses and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that a/she s" ed.
My Commission Expires: 2??
-oV0&. Rosalie G. MoGinnis Notary Public
c?/, g My ComrMa m D01 98W
or wow Expires May 16, 2007
S: application forms/development review/comprehensive landscape program application.doc
Page 3 of 3
Special Area or Scenic Corridor Plan. The landscape treatment proposed in the Comprehensive Landscape
Program is consistent with any special area or scenic corridor plan which the City of Clearwater has prepared and
adopted for the area in which the parcel proposed for development is located.
1b.I+W.Wr...rt?,Tirwr<x»a(».va? r;
? 0
SMITH DLSGN GRU1P, I.i_C. A klcC fS P..L5LRVLP
PROPOSED,
0 FI( F
rni FOR:
;4LPP REALITI ADVISOR
A 907 S, FT. NARRiSON AVE,
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756
T
?G
4
rr,
nr?
r
tJ?
?I V•
1
O
i?
II a
I
'. v
!I
I
SMIN DE5,6N GR(.AJP, I.1.C. A',? F21Fiw+f? N.L5EI2VLU
PROPOSED
OFFI! F
FOR:
14LPP PEALITI ADVISOQ? z
A 907 S, FT. HARRISON AVE,
CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756