Loading...
FLS2005-03025; PLT2005-0007 Planning Department 100 learwater, South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Clearwater C Telephone: 727-562-4567 = Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ --___ * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) 1W FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Single Family (LDR or LMDR only) Residential Infill Project (Revised 12/30/2004) ---PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT--- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. MAILING ADDRESS: 9020 Rancho Del Rio Drive, Suite 132, New Port Richey, Florida 34655 PHONE NUMBER: 727-376-6831 CASE #:?L? fit(] DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ----------- ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: ---------------- LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: ---------------- SOUTH: --------------------- WEST: -------------------- EAST: FAX NUMBER: 727-376-5973 PROPERTY OWNER(S): Deeb Family Homes, Ltd- ____ -----In,{?- 3? / - (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) U V L.(M AGENT NAME: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. (Octavio Cabrera, P.E.)--------------- MA-Rs l-DOL- MAILING ADDRESS: 3030 Starkey Boulevard, New Port PHONE NUMBER: 727-849-7588 CELL NUMBER: 727-271-1846 FL 34655 FAX NUMBER: 727-848-3648 E-MAIL ADDRESS: ocabrera&fldeSign.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 2945 Sunset Point Road and adjacent vacant parcel to west. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attachment "A" ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: 05-29-16-00000-140-0900 and 05-29-16-00000-140-1200 PARCEL SIZE: 3.21 Acres or 139,828 s.f. --------------------------- ----------------------------------- (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): _ Fourteen (14) single family detached homes (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): - See Attachment "B" Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) Page 1 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater r ATTACHMENT "B" DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant proposes to develop the subject property into fourteen (14) single-family detached lots. Due to the limitations imposed by the dimensions of the subject parcel, there are a number of deviations the applicant is requesting approval of, as follows: 1. Approval of a 50-foot wide "private" right of way, where 60 feet width is called for by the regulations. The depth of the parcel, 251 +/- feet, only allows two (2) tiers of 100 ft. deep lots and a 50-foot wide private right-of-way. The short length of the street and the limited number of lots (14) would support the reduced right-of-way. In order to adequately accommodate the utilities, the applicant proposes an additional 10-foot wide utilities easement immediately adjacent to each side of the "private" right-of-way. 2. A reduction of the front setback from 25 feet, down to 20 feet. This would allow construction of homes with an overall footprint more in keeping with the adjacent properties. The resulting setback, however, will still support the customary two (2) parking spaces at each driveway. 3. Applicant proposes a 10-foot wide landscape parcel along the C.R. 193 right-of-way. We are requesting that the adjacent lots (Lots 1 and 14) be recognized as "interior" lots. Thus requiring only a 5-foot side setback from the landscape parcels. 4. Applicant is recording a limitation prohibiting direct access from Lots 1 - 6 to Sunset Point Road. We are requesting that the setback from Sunset Point Road be designated a rear yard setback requiring only 15 feet. 5. Applicant requests that gates be allowed at both ends of the "private" right-of-way, as shown on the site plan. The gates will be outfitted with emergency features that would allow fire, emergency services and solid waste to operate the gates. 6. Allow a six (6) foot tall fence/wall in front of setbacks along Sunset Point Road and C.R. 193. :pcm K:\Sunset Point\Pemrits\City of Clearwater Flexible Standard Development Application Attachment B.doc APR 1 1 2005 P, ?, ", . • f ATTACHMENT "B" DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST The applicant proposes to develop the subject property into fourteen (14) single-family detached lots. Due to the limitations imposed by the dimensions of the subject parcel, there are a number of deviations the applicant is requesting approval of, as follows: 1. Approval of a 50-foot wide "private" right of way, where 60 feet width is called for by the regulations. The depth of the parcel, 251 +/- feet, only allows two (2) tiers of 100 ft. deep n lots and a 50-foot side private right-of-way. The short length of the street and the limited number of lots (14) would support the reduced right-of-way. In order to adequately accommodate the utilities, the applicant proposes an additional 10-foot wide utilities easement immediately adjacent to each side of the "private" right-of-way. 2. A reduction of the front setback from 25 feet, down to 20 feet. This would allow construction of homes with an overall footprint more in keeping with the adjacent properties. The resulting setback, however, will still support the customary two (2) parking spaces at each driveway. 3. Applicant proposes a 10-foot wide landsca e parcel along the C.R. 193 right-of-way. We • are requesting that the adjacent lots (Lots 13 and 14) be recognized as "interior" lots. Thus requiring only a 5-foot side setback from the landscape parcels. 4. Applicant is recording a limitation prohibiting direct access from Lots 1 - 6 to Sunset Point Road. We are requesting that the setback from Sunset Point Road be designated a rear yard setback requiring only 15 feet. 5. Applicant requests that gates be allowed at both ends of the "private" right-of-way, as shown on the site plan. The gates will be outfitted with emergency features that would allow fire, emergency services and solid waste to operate the gates. :pcm K:\Sunset Point\Pennits\City of Clearwater Flexible Standard Development Application Attachment B.doc WA O DD MAR 31 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES ____ NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) C3 Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The proposed use, single-family detached homes, is consistent with surrounding residential uses. The size/price of the proposed homes will likewise be in harmony with the neighborhood. _ 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The surrounding property is currently developed as single-family detached homes. The proposed project will maintain the character of the vicinity. _ 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed development proposes a stormwater connection to Sunset Point Road that will improve existing conditions under severe rainfall events. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. The proposed subdivision would limit access for the residents to C.R. 193._C_R_ 193 has an existing fully _ operating median ooenina on Sunset Point Road_ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed residential homesites within a gated self-supporting community would be very consistent with the character of the immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. The proposed subdivision would be fenced, all around. The setbacks from existing _developed properties are not being reduced. -Add itionally, the ?roosed connection to the existing gravi y__ _ sanitary sewer system will preclude the need for a lift station. IR r,=3 -?7 ' '7 MAR 31 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 O Provide complete responses to the seven (7) RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECT CRITERIA- Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and development standards. The deviations the applicant has requested from the minimum development standards are necessary due to the specific parcel dimensions. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) The proposed development of "new" single-family detached homes could result in an "increased" fair market value of abutting properties. Whereas the existing vacant parcel is an attractor for vagrants and homeless people. 3. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. With the exception of a few minor deviations noted in our description of the project, the proposed _ subdivision conforms to the existing zoning. Furthermore, the requested deviations have been previously approved in the City of Clearwater for other small parcels that faced similar restrictions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- 4. The uses or mix of use within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The use, residential sinqle-family detached is the same as the adiacent land uses. ----------- - -------- - -------- ------ - ---------- - - - -------- - --- - --- --- - -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The proposed home size, quality and price range would have a positive impact on existing adjacent properties. ---------------------- ---------- --------- 6. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. - - - - --- - --- - - - --- - - - - -- The proposed project would be considered an asset in any area of the City of Clearwater, since the quality of the proiect is near the top of the Clearwater market. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. --- - --- - ------ - ------ - --- --- - --------- -------- - - - --- - - - - - - - --- - --------- - - ------------ The requested deviations will allow the development to proceed as planned. The deviations, however, will not have a perceptible impact on the desirability of the proposed homesites, or that of the adjacent properties. R;= ZHLL; g?? _'D MAR 31 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 3 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that involv addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance with th City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exemption I this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. E] At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: ___ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; ___ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; ___ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. __ Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. 0 COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable LEE] Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): SID SD - Stormwater plan as noted above is included provided. Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall bel CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) Q SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; El TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; lQ LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Ib PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; El GRADING PLAN, as applicable; © PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); M COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) u i. / `-° E] SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; -!L C DD North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; MAR 31 2005 _ Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; PLANNING DEPARTMENT All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; CITY OF CLEARWATER _ All required sight triangles; _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 4 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater • _ r Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; _ Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; _ Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and _ Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. (p SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; ___ Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; ___ Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio F.A.R. for all nonresidential uses. ; O REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; O FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: R 1 7tt(.+J C One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; MAR LU _ V Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; P1Ai KING DEPARTMENT Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; _= Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); CITY OF CLEARWATER _ Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); ___ Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) Q LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; _ Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; __L_ Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; 21 Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. M REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); M IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 5 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater 0 0 I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. O BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS -all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8 '/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. I? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required) . Ec ' 's P. 7 Id Reduced signage proposal (8 '% X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. s iJ v K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) Ib Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: PLANNING DEPART • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF CLEPRWi • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. E] Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): 0 Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. SD _ Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property descro" -Y, d in this application. Signature Of property owner or representative bv: Deeb Familv Homes, Inc. V"&_A- STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF FI&EEM Sworn to Id subscribed before me this 3_:?__ day of A. D. 20ja,:?- to me and/or by w o is ersonally kn_ own has produced ----------A- - ---?--- ------------ as ide ti Notary pu I' , ' My comm' Sion expires: W r._ 11Anf1[1f1A 41, ;?f My commission OD231346 Expires September 15, 2007 Page 6 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater • 0 AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): See Attachment "A" 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) Subdivide into fourteen (14) single-family detached lots. As described in Attachment "B" 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Florida Design Consultants. Inc. (Octavio Cabrera, P.E., Sr. Project Manager) as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and correct. By: Deeb Family HO es, Inc. 40 1 4"o Property Ow +r Stephanie D. Dieters, President Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Pip STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF RIAXEM ore me a undersigned, an officer duly commissioneqjjy the la s of the Sta Flor on th'O day of jlto-s personally appeared who having been first dul worn Deposes and says that 41wF ie ully understands the contents o he affidavit that*F she signed. ry ?0- Marjorie H. Sindslar • My Commission ;1)231346 Nota Public My Commission Expires: orw Expires Septem bar 16, 2007 r7 7 % /7 0. S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewltlexible standard development application residential infill2005.doc f0 4, R 0 1 20,9i5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 7 of 7 - Flexible Standard Development Application Residential Infill 2005- City of Clearwater A Ro-c- km e-n? it A t/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OF THE PROPOSED PLAT OF "SUNSET POINT SUBDIVISION" A parcel of land being a portion of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, Township 29 South. Range 16 East. City of Clearwater. Pinellas County. Florida, being more particularly described as follows: COMMENCE at the East 1/4 corner of Section 5, Township 29 South, Range 16 East, Pinellas County. Florida; thence N89°41'46"W, along the South line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 5 (being the basis of bearings for this legal description). for 718.82 feet to the point of intersection with a line 718.82 feet West of and parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, some being the POINT OF.BEGINNING; thence leaving said line 718.82 feet West of and parallel with the East line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, continue N89°41'46"W. along said South line of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, for 564.40 feet to the point of intersection with the East Right-of-Way line of County Road 193. according to Official Records Book 8894, page 1101 of the Public Records of Pinellas County. Florida: thence leaving sold South line of.the Northeast 1/4 of Section 5. N03°15'37'E, along said East Right-of-Way line of County Road 193, for 251.51 feet to the point of intersection with the South Right-of-Way-line of Sunset Point Road (County Road 576), according to Official Records Book 1935. page 534 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida; thence leaving said East Right-of-Way line of County Road 193. S89039'15"E. along the South Right-of-Way line of Sunset Point Road (County Road 576), according to said Official Records Book 1935, page 534 and Official Records Book 1950. page 488 of the Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. respectively. for 550.36 feet to the point of intersection with said line T18.82 feet West of and parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of Section 5; thence leaving said South Right-of-Way line of Sunset Point Road (County Road 576), S00003'30"W, along said line 718.82 feet West of and parallel with the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of Section 5, for 250.77 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 139.889 square feet or 3.211 acres. more or less. Error of closure: 0.0079 feet (LCS) C 1,V I L I =JaLl=. MAR ? 1 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER so CITY OF CLEARWATER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL rr' PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 99lygrEp?C?? MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2"d FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. ADDRESS 9020 Rancho Del Rio Drive, Suite 132, New Port Richey, FL 34655 PHONE NUMBER 727-376-6831 FAX NUMBER : 727-376-5973 APPLICANT'S NAME Same as Above ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME FAX NUMBER : Octavio Cabrera, P.E., Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard, New Port Richey, FL 34655 PHONE NUMBER 727-849-7588 FAX NUMBER : 727-848-3648 I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by - Stephanie D. Dieter: who is personally known to Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF S r to and-su cribed before me of A.Dme and/or Gay j me Stephanie D. Dieters, President my comrrVsion expires: x+•y?F Madorie H. Sindelar , My Commission DD231346 Ten (10) copies of the preliminary plat must be submitted. ?wd Expires September 15, 2007 The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; ???? ??1??If,nD EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; Page I APR 0 7 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT STREETS RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY. ,,,, RECEI!/ED PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATEI? 0 0 ?SEKL CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL BUILDING, Ar?o?. PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL OF FINAL PLAT INSTRUCTIONS The final plat shall be suitable for recording at the office of the clerk of the circuit court. It shall be prepared and sealed buy a land surveyor registered by the state and shall conform with the requirements of Florida Statute, Chapter 177, and the requirements of this subsection. It shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals 50 feet or other scale determined appropriate by the city engineer. The overall sheet size of the plat shall be consistent with the standards established by the clerk of the circuit court for recording. Each sheet shall be provided with a one-inch margin on each of three sides and a three-inch margin on the left side of the plat for binding purposes. Eighteen (18) copies of the Final Plat must be submitted. ALL FINAL PLATS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: NAME OF PLAT; LOCATION OF THE PLAT BY U.S. SURVEY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE, COUNTY AND STATE; NAMES OF EXISTING STREETS ABUTTING RO GIVING ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT; ALL PLAT BOUNDARIES BASED ON AN ACCURATE TRANSVERSE, WITH ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS SHOWN. ERROR OF ENCLOSURE OF SUCH BOUNDARY SURVEY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT FOR EACH 10,000 FEET OF PERIMETER SURVEY; ALL BLOCKS, LOTS, STREETS, CROSSWALKS, EASEMENTS AND WATERWAYS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PLAT, ALL OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS GIVEN AND ALL RADII, INTERNAL ANGLES, BEARINGS, POINTS OF CURVATURE, TANGENTS AND LENGTHS OF ALL CURVES, SO THAT NO DIMENSIONS OR DATA ARE MISSING WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF ANY OF THE CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES OF BLOCKS, LOTS OR STREETS, AS LISTED ABOVE. WHEN ANY LOT OR PORTION OF THE PLAT IS BOUNDED BY AN IRREGULAR LINE, THE MAJOR PORTION OF THAT LOT OR PLAT SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A WITNESS LINE SHOWING COMPLETE DATA, WITH DISTANCES ALONG SUCH LINES EXTENDED BEYOND THE ENCLOSURE TO THE IRREGULAR BOUNDARY SHOWN WITH AS MUCH CERTAINTY AS CAN BE DETERMINED OR AS "MORE OR LESS", IF VARIABLE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT. TRUE ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHALL BE DRAWN TO THE NEAREST ESTABLISHED OFFICIAL MONUMENTS, NOT LESS THAN THREE OF WHICH SHALL BE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT. THE INTENDED USE OF ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED. CURVILINEAR LOTS SHALL SHOW ARC DISTANCES, AND RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING. RADIAL LINES SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED. DIRECTION OF NONRADIAL LINES SHALL BE INDICATED; SUFFICIENT ANGLES AND BEARINGS SHALL IDENTIFY THE DIRECTION OF ALL LINES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO THE NEAREST SECOND; Page 3 RDE k'C E ? V Em I D AVR 0 7 1095 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINES SHALL BE SHOWN WITH DISTANCES, ANGLES, BEARINGS OR AZIMUTH, POINTS OF CURVATURE, POINTS OF TANGENCY, POINTS OF REVERSE CURVATURE, POINTS OF COMPOUND CURVATURE, ARC DISTANCE, CENTRAL ANGLES, TANGENTS, RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING OR AZIMUTH, OR BOTH ALL EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES OR UTILITIES, AND ANY LIMITATIONS OF SUCH EASEMENTS; ALL LOT NUMBERS AND LINES. LOT LINES SHALL BE MARKED WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS OF FEET, AND BEARINGS OR ANGLES TO STREET LINES; ACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY AREA TO BE DEDICATED OR RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE WITH THE PURPOSE INDICATED THEREON; TITLE, DATE OF SURVEY, GRAPHIC SCALE OF MAP AND NORTH ARROW. THE BEARING OR AZIMUTH REFERENCE SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT IN THE NOTES OR LEGEND; PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE SATE OF FLORIDA; EACH PLAT SHALL SHOW A DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS PLATTED, AND THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE THE SAME IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATION. THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE SO COMPLETE THAT FROM IT, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE PLAT, THE STARTING POINT AND BOUNDARY CAN BE DETERMINED; THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND THE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SEAL; ALL SECTION LINES AND QUARTER SECTION LINES OCCURRING IN THE MAP OR PLAT SHALL BE INDICATED BY LINES DRAWN UPON THE MAP OR PLAT, WITH APPROPRIATE WORDS AND FIGURES. IF THE DESCRIPTION IS BY METES AND BOUNDS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING SHALL BE INDICATED, TOGETHER WITH ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES OF THE BOUNDARY LINES. IF THE PLATTED LANDS ARE IN A LAND GRANT OR ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT SURVEYS, THEN THE BOUNDARIES ARE TO BE DEFINED BY METES AND BOUNDS AND COURSES. THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE TIED TO THE NEAREST GOVERNMENT CORNER OF OTHER RECORDED AND WELL-ESTABLISHED CORNER; ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY PLAT TITLE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE OR, IF UNPLATTED, LAND SHALL BE SO DESIGNED. IF THE AREA PLATTED IS A REPLATTING OF A PART OR THE WHOLE OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT, SUFFICIENT TIES SHALL BE SHOWN TO CONTROLLING LINES APPEARING ON THE EARLIER PLAT TO PERMIT AN OVERLAY TO BE MADE AND REFERENCE TO THE REPLATTING SHALL BE STATED AS A SUBTITLE FOLLOWING THE NAME OF THE PLAT WHEREVER IT APPEARS ON THE PLAT; ALL LOTS SHALL BE NUMBERED EITHER BY PROGRESSIVE NUMBERS OR, IF IN BLOCKS, PROGRESSIVELY NUMBERED OR LETTERED IN EACH BLOCK, EXCEPT THAT BLOCKS IN NUMBER ADDITIONS BEARING THE SAME NAME MAY BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY THROUGHOUT THE SEVERAL ADDITIONS; PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PARCELS SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED; ALL INTERIOR EXCEPTED PARCELS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND LABELED "NOT A PART OF THIS PLAT"; THE PURPOSE OF ALL AREAS DEDICATED MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED OR STATED ON THE PLAT; WHEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SHOW CURVE DETAIL INFORMATION ON THE MAP, A TABULAR FORM MAY BE USED. Page 4 RECEIVED AVR 0'7 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL PLAT: A TITLE OPINION OF AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE SATE OR A CERTIFICATION BY AN ABSTRACTOR OR A TITLE COMPANY STATING THAT THE COURT RECORDS IDENTIFY THAT THE TITLE TO THE LAND AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAT IS IN THE NAME OF THE PERSON EXECUTING THE DEDICATION. IN ADDITION, A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CONSENT TO PLATTING OF LANDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE SHALL BE FILED TOGETHER WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR EACH PERSON OR CORPORATION HOLDING A MORTGAGE ON ALL LAND INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, WHERE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT SIGNED THE FINAL PLAT. THE TITLE OPINION OR CERTIFICATION SHALL SHOW ALL MORTGAGES NOT SATISFIED OR RELEASED OF RECORD NOR OTHER WISE TERMINATED BY LAW; CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THAT THE PLAT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT ALL THE NECESSARY SURVEY MONUMENTS, LOT SIZES AND LOT DIMENSIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN THEREON, AND THAT THE PLAT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 AND THIS DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPRESSED ON THE PLAT AND AFFIXED THERETO SHALL BE THE PERSONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE TO THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR INCLUDING THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE SURVEYOR, BY WHOM OR UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION THE PLAT WAS PREPARED; A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PLATTED LANDS. HOWEVER, A NEW BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR A REPLAT IS REQUIRED ONLY WHEN THE REPLAT AFFECTS ANY BOUNDARY OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED PROPERTY OR WHEN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE LANDS TO BE REPLATTED OR ADJOINING LANDS. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED AND PREPARED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PRECEDING THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PLAT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT RESTRICT A LEGAL ENTITY FROM EMPLOYING ONE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PERFORM AND PREPARE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PREPARE THE PLAT, EXCEPT THAT BOTH THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND THE PLAT MUST BE UNDER THE SAME LEGAL ENTITY; CERTIFICATION THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID; EVERY PLAT OF A SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM FILED FOR RECORD SHALL INCLUDE ANY REQUIRED DEDICATION BY THE APPLICANT. THE DEDICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY ALL OWNERS HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND BEING PLATTED, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED. ALL MORTGAGEES HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND PLATTED SHALL EXECUTE, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED, EITHER THE DEDICATION CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OR IN A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT JOINING THE RATIFICATION OF THE PLAT AND ALL DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS THEREON IN THE FORM OF A CONSENT TO PLAT FROM ALL MORTGAGE INTERESTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEN A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND HAS BEEN PLATTED AND A PLAT THEREOF BEARING THE DEDICATION EXECUTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY HAS BEEN SECURED AND RECORDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DIVISION, ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC AREAS SHOWN ON SUCH PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE BEEN DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREON, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SEPARATE ACTION BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION TO FORMALLY ACCEPT SUCH OFFERS OF DEDICATION; ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRIVATE RESTRICTION AND TRUSTEESHIPS AND THEIR PERIODS OF EXISTENCE SHALL BE FILED AS A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REFERENCE TO SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL BE NOTED ON THE FINAL PLAT; Page 5 AFTER A FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED, THREE PRINTS OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE BEE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE SUCH PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE: UNLESS ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED, AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY EVERY PLAT WHICH IS TO BE RECORDED TO ENSURE THE ACTUAL SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN NOT MORE THAN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE RECORDING, OR ONE YEAR IF SIDEWALKS ARE THE ONLY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING THE DATE OF RECORDING. AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED IF THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES IT APPROPRIATE AND MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME IN PROPORTION TO THE WORK COMPLETED, AND MAY TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY; CASH, TO BE HELD IN A SEPARATE ESCROW ACCOUNT BY THE CITY; OR AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT WRITTEN BY A BANK CHARTERED BY THE SATE, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE UNITED STATES IF THE BANK IS AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER THINGS, AN EXPIRATION DATE NOT EARLIER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE; A PROVISION REQUIRING THE ISSUER OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT TO GIVE AT LEAST 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OR RENEWAL OF THE LETTER; AND A PROVISION THAT THE LETTER IS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQUALING ITS ORIGINAL TERM OF THE REQUIRED NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN; OR A SURETY BOND ISSUED BY A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE. THE SURETY BOND SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE PROVISION REQUIRED FOR LETTERS OF CREDIT. S: application forms/development review/plat approval application.doc Page 6 9':25 am' Case Number: FLS2005-03d*- 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Owner(s): Deeb Family Homes 9020 Rancho Del Rio Drive Suit New Port Richey, A 34655 TELEPHONE: 727-376-6831, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Deeb Family Homes 9020 Rancho Delrio Suite 132 New Port Richey, Fl 346 TELEPHONE: 727-376-6831, FAX: 727-376-5973, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Florida Design Consultants, In 3030 Starkey Blvd New Port Richey, Fl 34655 TELEPHONE: 727-849-7588, FAX: 727-848-3648, E-MAIL: ocabrera@fldesign.com Location: 3.21 acres located at the south-east corner of the intersection of Sunset Point Road and CR 139. Atlas Page: 255B Zoning District: LMDR, Low Medium Density Residential Request: Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (Sunrise Drive) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 to the building; a front (north) setback reduction (Sunset Point Road) from 25 feet to 15 to the building; and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in required structural setback adjacent to a public right of way, per Section 2-203.C. Also included in the request is Preliminary Plat approval on PLT2005-00007. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, FI 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Forestwood Estates Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33759 1883 Forest Dr TELEPHONE: 791-6021, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: John Schodtler, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . Prior to building permit: 1. Provide recorded copy of 15 ft. sanitary sewer easement which allows subject parcel access to existing manhole. 2. Fire hydrant lines greater than 10 ft. in length shall be constructed of ductile iron pipe. 3. Approved right-of-way permits from Pinellas County for any work in county rights-of-way are required prior to issuance of a building permit. (Specifically, access to CR 193 and Sunset Point Road and fencing proposed in CR 193 right-of-way). 4. The City of Clearwater, at applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any water meters that have to be removed or relocated as part of this development. 5. Final plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County (Development Code 4-708). General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - Page 7 Get U" Fire hydrants mr* provided within 500 ft of the most remote pot of every residence. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Any single family residence of 3 or more stories must have a fire sprinkler system. Please respond PRIOR TO D.O. Ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes. Please respond PRIOR TO D.O. (4 :? Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Install gate type lock boxes as per County Ordinance No. 98-4. Applications for lock boxes are available at the Life Safety Building of Clearwater Fire and Rescue, 600 Franklin St., Clearwater. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. 06. Provide 24 ft wide roadway for fire department and emergency vehicle access. Please afL acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Show the FDC for any building that is required to be protected by a fire sprinkler system at least t 15 away from the building and within 40 feet of a fire hydrant. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. ? 8 Provide minimum 28 ft turning radii for fire department and emergency vehicle ingress and egress. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: I . Remove the "Ribbon" tree barricade detail prior to Building permit. 2. The tree inventory lists tree #71-74 and #139-145 twice, verify accuracy of the inventory prior to Building permit. Land)aping: /v In the retention pond area the use of Red Maple, bald and pond cypress is recommended. /1)) The property owner shall, within 30 days, plant a hedge or other solid landscape buffer on the C/ outside of the fence/wall parallel to the two street right of ways. The buffer shall consist of ^ shrubs at least 18 inches in height at the time of planting. The plan indicates portions of a / hedge on the interior of the proposed wall or fence. Revise plans for review. The plans propose the removl of most if not all of the trees on this parcel and a replacement of primarily one species. The use of the Live Oaks in the northern line along Sunset Point Rd. should be reconsidered, these trees planted so close to a wall will create problems in the future. The use of a variety of trees is strongly recommended to avoid diseases or pests spreading through a monoculture of trees. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open Space impact fees are due prior to issueance of building permit or final plat (if ilk applicable), whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: ? 1 . P 'or to building permit: O ?IU 1) Please provide copy of County drainage connection permit. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: 1 . 1. The location of gates must be at a minimum of 40' from back edge of sidewalk to the face of gate. This is to allow for visiting motorists, service trucks and moving trucks to stage when gate is not opened. Address all of the above conditions prior to a D.O.. 1. Prior to building permit, provide an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County or FDOT for any work in a county or state right-of-way. General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to D.O.. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - Page 8 Planning: i • I Revise site plan to provide driveway locations for each lot, not a typical. In particular the lots located nearest the entrances with the proposed gates. 2. Any fence or wall that exceeds three feet in height and is located within any required structural setback adjacent to a public right-of-way shall provide a three feet wide landscaped strip on the street side of the fence. Also, If the landscape buffer incorporates the use of a fence or wall, access for maintenance purposes shall be provided to the secondary street (Sunset Point Road) from each lot. Revise all site plans. 3 . Clarify general applicability criteria regarding the proposed six foot wall/fence along Sunset Point Road and CR139. Staff did not find a characteristic of six foot wall along CR139 and fences along Sunset Point Road are constricted out of columns with substantial grill work. (Double frontage lots. For the purposes of fence placement on double frontage lots, the front yard shall be the side of the property from which the property is addressed. The placement of any fence on this side of the property shall adhere to the front setback provisions in Section 3-804(A) above. The other side of the property shall be considered a rear yard. A fence may be erected in compliance with the rear yard setback provisions in Section 3-804(B) above provided the following conditions exist: 1.The rear yards of the adjacent lots on the same side of the street are oriented the same as the lot on which the fence is proposed; and 2.The pattern of the dwellings across the street is also oriented with the rear yard facing the lots across the street. 3.If both of these conditions can not be met, such fence in the rear setback shall not exceed three feet in height.) 4. 5. Other: No Comments Notes: Due to the above listed conditions this application has been deemed insufficient. Please resubmit six sets of revisions prior to June 5, 2005. Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - Page 9 Case Number: PLT2005-000 - 2945 SUNSET POINT RD • 9:25 am Owner(s): Deeb Family Homes 9020 Rancho Del Rio Drive Suit New Port Richey, FI 34655 TELEPHONE: 727-376-6831, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Applicant Deeb Family Homes 9020 Rancho Delrio Suite 132 New Port Richey, Fl 346 TELEPHONE: 727-376-6831, FAX: 727-376-5973, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Florida Design Consultants, In 3030 Starkey Blvd New Port Richey, Fl 34655 TELEPHONE: 727-849-7588, FAX: 727-848-3648, E-MAIL: ocabrera@fldesign.com Location: 3.21 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTH-EAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SUNSET POINT ROAD AND CR 139. Atlas Page: 255B Zoning District: LDR, Low Density Residential Request: Preliminary Plat approval for 14 new residential lots (related to and see site reviews under FLS2005-03025). The request includes the reduction of the private right of way from a 60 foot width to 50 feet and a five foot restrictive access easement along the north boundary along Sunset Point Road, under the provisions of Section 4-702. Proposed Use: Detached dwelling Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Forestwood Estates Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33759 1883 Forest Dr TELEPHONE: 791-6021, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Presenter: John Schodder, Planner I Attendees Included: The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: I . 1. Show U.S. section, township and range lines on the preliminary plat. Environmental: No Comments Fire: No Comments Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Land Resources: No Comments Landscaping: I . no issues. Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open Space impact fees are due prior to issueance of building permit or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: I . No issues. Solid Waste: No Comments Traffic Engineering: No Comments Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - Page 10 Planning: • 1 . Parcels B and C do not comply with the minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 s.f. It appears you are trying to do by design what you can not do by right. Staff suggest an acceptable alternative would be to reduce the 70 foot wide lots to 65 feet in width and remove the "landscape" parcels B and C. This would provide lots 1 and 14 with the minimum required 25 foot front setbacks from CR139. Other: No Comments Notes: Development Review Agenda - Thursday, May 5, 2005 - Page 11 1 0 • DRC Meeting Date: May 5, 2005 Case Number: FLS2005-03025 Owner/Applicant: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. Address: 2945 Sunset Point Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single-family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (Sunrise Drive) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet (to the building); a front (north) setback reduction (Sunset Point Road) from 25 feet to 15 (to the building); and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in required structural setback adjacent to a public right of way, per Section 2-203.C. Also included in the request is Preliminary Plat approval on PLT2005-00007. EXISTING ZONING Low Medium Density Residential District (LMDR) LAND USE: Residential Low Classification (RL) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Single-Family Residential Proposed Use: 14 Single-Family Residential Units ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES: North: Single-family residential West: Single-family residential East: Single-family residential South: Single-family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings with maintained landscaping and site work dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: The 3.21 acres is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Sunset Point Road and CR 139. The parcel is located within a residentially developed area of single-family homes that are primarily not located with in the City of Clearwater's jurisdiction and exceed the minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 square feet. The characteristics of the single-family home lots located in the immediate vicinity are a mixture of City of Clearwater and Unincorporated Pinellas County properties. The unincorporated properties are un-platted metes and bounds lots and average over an acre (43,560 square feet) in lot area. The residential lots located within the City of Clearwater are platted and average 18,000 square feet in size. The lot widths on all properties are on average 80 feet in width. Provision of adequate building sites will be provided for the proposed single-family residences. It appears that the subdivision will provide adequate and convenient traffic access and circulation after the access gates are revised to meet the Fire and Engineering departments' revisions. While the lots proposed in the subdivision (Preliminary Plat) comply with the minimum lot size and lot width requirements for single-family homes located in the LMDR district, the lots are smaller in size than those adjacent and also in the immediate vicinity. The proposed double frontage lots paralleling Sunset Point Road, which is an arterial road, are acceptable per the Subdivision Design. Standards. In addition the applicant has request a five foot restrictive access easement preventing any access directly to the Sunset Point Road property lines. S: (Planning DepartmenhC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Wending CasesU - Up for the Next DROSunset Point Rd 29451Sunset Point 2945 Staff Report.doc 0 0 The proposed landscaped lots along the CR139 right of way frontage (Parcels B and C) do not comply with the minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 square feet. It appears you are trying to do by design what you cannot do by right. Staff suggests an acceptable alternative would be to reduce the 70 foot wide lots to 65 feet in width and remove the "landscape" parcels B and C to provide lots 1 and 14 with the minimum required 25 foot front setbacks from CR139. The characteristics of the single-family homes located in the immediate vicinity are a mixture of single story and multi- story and they average between 2,000 - 41000 square feet in gross floor area. All homes in the immediate vicinity are well maintained and landscaped. The applicant has submitted two separate typical house plans, but expects that most of the homes will be custom built and meet the proposed requests for setbacks. No submittal for pools or decks has been submitted, but the applicant expect they will be requested at a later date and will meet minimum standard code. The characteristics of fencime located in the immediate vicinity are a mixture of aluminum, chain link, and columns. The residential properties located on the north side of Sunset Point Road typically have a six-foot tall fence consisting of brick or masonry columns with substantial grillwork and landscaping along their frontages and the properties along the south of Sunset Point Road have no fencing. The residential properties located along CR139 typically have four foot chain link or aluminum fencing or no fencing at all. It should be noted that the properties located along CR139 are not located with in the City of Clearwater's jurisdiction and are not required to comply with the City's fence codes. The applicant has requested for the subdivision to be a gated community with six foot tall fencing and walls around the perimeter of the subdivision. The current fencing proposal does not comply with code and is not consistent with the characteristics of the adjacent properties, or the immediate vicinity. A letter of objection was received from the adjacent property owner to the east. Concerns are the fence/wall along his property line and the tree branches overhanging his property. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3- 913.A) and Residential Infill Projects in the MOD district: (Section 2-1602.E):have not been met. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, Yes, see coverage, density and character of adjacent properties. analysis 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development and use of Yes adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons Yes residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Yes 5. Development is consistent with the community character of the Yes, see: immediate vicinity. analysis 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, Yes including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR LMDR DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS: (Section 2-203.C): S: (Planning DepartmenhC D BTlex Standard (FGS)IPending Casesl3 - UpJor the Next DRCISunset Point Rd 29451Sunset Point 2945 StaJJ*Report.doc 6 0 1. Single-family detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential infill project application; 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development standards; 3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; 5. The uses within the residential infill project are compatible with adjacent land uses; 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. The design of the proposed residential infill project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; and 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height, off-street parking, access or other development standards is justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Consistent Inconsistent Yes Yes, see analysis Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes, see analysis Yes, see analysis SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on December 23, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single-family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (Sunrise Drive) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet (to the building); a front (north) setback reduction (Sunset Point Road) from 25 feet to 15 (to the building); and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in required structural setback adjacent to a public right of way, per Section 2-203.C. Also included in the request is Preliminary Plat approval on PLT2005-00007, on the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal does not comply with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infll. Project, per Section 2-1602.E. 2. The proposal is not in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is not compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: John Schodtler, Planner I S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BI Flex Standard (FLS)IPending Casesl3 - Up for the Next DROSunset Point Rd 29451Sunset Point 2945 Staff Report.doc 0 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 April 6, 2005 Mr. John Schodtler, Planner I City of Clearwater Planning Department Municipal Services Building 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 1 MFR 07 2005 DEV PLAN iY OF CLEARN ATER SVCS Re: FLS2005-0007 - 2945 Sunset Point Road - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Schodtler: Enclosed is an Application for Plat Approval. Also enclosed are fourteen (14) copies of the "revised" Preliminary Plat. The Plat has been revised to address the comments in your letter of April 5, 2005, as follows: Comment No. 1: Provide a completed Preliminary Plat Application (see attached). (Response No. 1: An Application for Plat Approval, duly signed and notarized is enclosed. (Please note the application review fee check was previously transmitted). Comment No. 2: Provide Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements to the preliminary plat page. Response No. 2: The Preliminary Plat shows all proposed easements. Please note that the private street is a portion of Parcel "A". The access easement portion of Parcel "A" has been dimensioned. omment No. 3: Provide proposed street names to the preliminary plat page. 15/Response No. 3: The proposed street name for the private drive is "Sunrise Drive". Comment No. 4: Provide the dimensions and area of the following: the overall plat and each lot, streets, rights-of-ways (including radii of cul-de-sacs), common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purpose if any. Suggestion: place the lot areas in square feet under each of the individual lot numbers. 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fidesign.com Mr. John Schodtler • April 6, 2005 Page 2 Response No. 4: The lot area (in square feet) for each of the lots has been added to the Preliminary Plat. If you have any additional questions or comments, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Senior Project Manager Enclosures c: Stephanie D. Dieters, Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. File 508-27-10.01 :Pcm K:\Sunset Point\L.etters\Schodt1er.01.doc I /! ri, Arr ! PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEAPWATEp FLORIDA DESIGN CONSUITANIS, INC. Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 March 31, 2005 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Sunset Point Subdivision Gentlemen: MAR e 1 2LIU5 PLANNING DE-RAWMEW CITY OF CLE AMWMER Enclosed is the completed Residential Infill Application, one original and 14 copies, for the Sunset Point Subdivision. Also enclosed are: c 15 sets of the Site Plans (Landscape Plans included in Site Plan sets) 0 3 copies of Master Drainage Report for Sunset Point subdivision 0 1 Development Application check in the amount of $200 0 15 copies signed and sealed of the Boundary Surveys 0 15 copies signed and sealed of the Preliminary Plat 0 1 Platting Application check in the amount of $600. 0 1 Reduced Set (11" x 17") of the Site Plan 0 1 Reduced Set (11" x 17") of the Preliminary Plat A traffic study was not warranted for the proposed Sunset Point subdivision because it will only generate 140 daily trips (10 trips/day x 14 single family homes = 140 trips per dry). Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns at (727)724-8422. Sincerely, Octavio Cabrera, Senior Project Manager :es K:\Sunset Point\Letters\City of Cleatwater.doc Encl. c: Stephanie D. Dieters, Deeb Family Homes, Ltd., w/Encl. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E, FDC, w/o Encl. File 508-27-40.01 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com CWY OF CLEARWATER DEVELOPMENT & NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES REFUND REQUEST FORM CASE NUMBER: l_. S: C TYPE OF FEE (S): (- I - -, f TOTAL AMOUNT OF REFUND: $ -- REASON FOR REFUND; NAME OF CUSTOMER REQUESTING REFUND: JJ f -- ADDRESS: PHONE: NCO I CITY STAFF MEMBER REQUESTING REFUND: • WE CAN ONLY MAIL THIS REFUND TO THE PERSON WHO WROTE E ORIGINAL CHECK. PLEASE GIVE THE ADDRESS YOU WOULD LIKE E CHECK TO BE MAILED TO BELOW: STAFF NOTES: REFUND APPROVED BY: 1 Please attach any additional documents as needed. 9iptr, M3 ?r rt... 7E, Payment History For Case #: FLS2005-03025 4/7/2005 11:12AM Recorded Type Fee ID # Description Fees Paid Date Paid Check # Receipt ii By ` Due History FL R 200503311024334270 Flexible Residential (SFR) 200.00 200.00 3/31/2005 1176 1200500000000002517 R -D 0.00 Total Fees: $200.00 Paid: $200.00 • • Page 1 of I TOTAL REMAINING DUE: $0.00 CasePaymentH istory.. rpt Tidemark Advantage -[Fee s Assoc iated with FILS2005-03025] File Edit Options Windov? Help Ij E?:it Ncw Open T o-k List OBE i - Olc•;c View" Add 4 )ekte PapFce Hiaor; Print Refund Fee Tytre _ - 4 Reueiiue.,GLLAccount Fee Aniotutt Amount Due Updated By Tj u) Code '61 !??" ;r / 0 0 D?? ?off 0 Itta1=: $200.00 $0.00 !'siel•v,'P•dd Fees Start r . I '.Tidemark Advantage -..,]tVteekings - Microsoft Inter, - --- --- - -- - ------- Zoning Letters !E j, '> I_ ;t 10:-11 Arl dT EAfltij. tA4yq?F1''?r??gx 'Y??+' is w .'. a i y Y ? CASE SUMMARY FLS2005-03025 2945 SUNSET POINT RD PHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 SUNSET POINT SUB Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (private street) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 to the building and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in required structural setback adjacent to a public right of way, per Section 2-203.C. PEOPLE Role: Other DEEB FAMILY HOMES 9020 RANCHO DELRIO SUITE 132 NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34655 Owner/Property DEEB FAMILY HOMES 9020 RANCHO DEL RIO DRIVE SUIT NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34655 Other CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 Other FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. 3030 STARKEY BLVD NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34655 Other FORESTWOOD ESTATES 1883 FOREST DR CLEARWATER, FL 33759 FEES Flexible Residential (SFR) Total CONDITIONS PHONE: 727-376-6831 FAX: 727-376-5973 PHONE: 727-376-6831 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727-725-3345 FAX: No Fax PHONE: 727-849-7588 FAX: 727-848-3648 PHONE: 791-6021 FAX: No Fax Assessed Amount Amount Paid Balance Due $200.00 $200.00 $0.00 $200.00 $200.00 $0.00 All conditions must be met before a permit can be issued. • • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVE. CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 r:\Forms\I nfoSummary. rpt FLS2005-03025 • 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Zoning Condition Not Met Provide Tree Inventory; provided by a certified arborist. Not Met Revise Site Data Table to include each individual lot, including the common area. Provide the following: Use, lot area, lot width, lot depth, Impervious surface area %, units, density, setbacks, height, and parking. Not Met Revise attachment "B" to include six foot tall fence/wall in front setbacks along Sunset Point Road and CR193. Met Any fence or wall that exceeds three feet in height and is located within any required structural setback adjacent to a public right-of-way shall provide a three foot wide landscaped strip on the street side of the fence. Not Met Clarify attachment "B" request number three. A 10 foot landscaping parcel adjacent to lots 13 and 14. Don't you mean lots 1 and 14? Not Met Provide estimated project value of entire project. Met Revise site plan to include footprint and size of proposed typical buildings and structures located on lots one, two, and thirteen only. Not Met Provide typical building elevations (all four sides) including height dimsnsions, to justify setback reductions. Not Met Request does not indicate a request for any accessory structures such as, swimming pools, sheds, decks or patios. Clarify. Not Met Revise site plan to provide driveway locations. Met It is suggested that the driveway for lots 1 and 14 be located to the east of the property to avoid conflicts with the corner and/or the proposed gate. ACTIVITIES Date 1 Application received Date 2 Date 3 3/31/2005 Done Disp By SLW DRC Meeting 3/31/2005 CRT Review 3/31/2005 Harbor Master Review 3/31/2005 Zoning Review 3/31/2005 Solid Waste Review 3/31/2005 Fire Review 3/31/2005 Land Resource Review 3/31/2005 Tree Survey Recd 3/31/2005 Traffic Eng Review 3/31/2005 Documents attached in PPlan 3/31/2005 Engineering Review 3/31/2005 D.O. Mailed Out 3/31/2005 Legal Review 3/31/2005 Stormwater Review 3/31/2005 Park & Rec Review 3/31/2005 r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt FLS2005-03025 2945 SUNSET POINT RD • Site Visit 3/31/2005 Landscaping Review 3/31/2005 Environmental Review 3/31/2005 Letter of Incompleteness Monday, April 11, 2005 (12:00 noon). 4/5/2005 • DONE JVS r:\Forms\InfoSummary.rpt S?ALam 4/7/2005 Receipt #: 1200500000000002517 11:14:26AM q = Date: 03/31/2005 r Line Items: Case No Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid FLS2005-03025 04 Flexible Residential (SFR) 010-341262 200.00 Line Item Total: Payments: $200.00 Method Payer Bank No Account No Confirm No . How Received Amount Paid Check DEEB FAMILY HOMES LTD R -D 1176 In Person 200. Payment Total: $200.00 40 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. cRcccipt.rpt Page 1 of I 0 0 RECEVED MAR r: 1 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER FLS2005-03025 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Date Received: 03/31/2005 SUNSET POINT SUB ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE: ATLAS PAGE: 255B PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLW CoverSheet ITT OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 13, 2005 Mr. Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, FL 34655 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-03025 / PLT2005-00007 at 2945 Sunset Point Road (Sunset Point Subdivision). Dear Mr. Cabrera: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On May 5, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (Sunrise Drive) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet to the building; a front (north) setback reduction (Sunset Point Road) from 25 feet to 15 feet to the building; a front (west) setback reduction (CR 193) from 25 feet to 20 feet to the building; and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in a required structural setback adjacent to a public right-of-way, as a Residential Infill Project, per Section 2-203.C. Also included in the request is Preliminary Plat approval on PLT2005-00007. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C; 2. The proposal complies with Preliminary Plat criteria under the provisions of Section 4-701; 3. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 4. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Condition for Approval: 1. That approved right-of-way permits from Pinellas County for any work in county rights-of-way be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. (Specifically, access to CR 193 and Sunset Point Road); 2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, a final plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County (Development Code 4-708); FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR BILL JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCIL-MEMBER HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMIIER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMIIER "FQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMA,TIv13 ACTION EMPLOYER" September 13, 2005 FLS2005-03025 - Page Two 3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a recorded copy of a 15 foot sanitary sewer easement allowing access to the existing manhole locate at the southwest end of the adjacent property to the east, to the Engineering Department; 4. That the vehicle access gates be relocated to provide a minimum spacing of 40 feet from the back edge of sidewalk to the gate face to provide for vehicle stacking; and 5. That prior to Certificate of Occupancy, all transportation impact fees be paid. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above five conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application dated received March 31, 2005 and the revised site plans dated received June 6, 2005. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (September 12, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodder, Planner I, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Make Us Your Favorite I incerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFlex Standard (FLS)IPending Cases12 -Reviewed and PendinglSunset Point Rd 2945 (lmdr) awaiting resub JVSIFLS2005-03025 Development Order.doc CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4865 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 13, 2005 Mr. Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Boulevard New Port Richey, FL 34655 RE: Development Order regarding case FLS2005-03025 % PLT2005-00007 at 2945 Sunset Point Road (Sunset Point Subdivision). Dear Mr. Cabrera: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-202.E of the Community Development Code. On May 5, 2005, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed your application for Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (Sunrise Drive) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet to the building; a front (north) setback reduction (Sunset Point Road) from 25 feet to 15 feet to the building; a front (west) setback reduction (CR 193) from 25 feet to 20 feet to the building; and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in a required structural setback adjacent to a public right-of-way, as a Residential Infill Project, per Section 2-203.C. Also included in the request is Preliminary Plat approval on PLT2005-00007. The DRC recommended approval of the application with the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal complies with Residential Infill criteria under the provisions of Section 2-203.C; 2. The proposal complies with Preliminary Plat criteria under the provisions of Section 4-701; 3. The plan complies with General Applicability Criteria under the provisions of Section 3-913; and 4. The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area. Condition for Approval: 1. That approved right-of-way permits from Pinellas County for any work in county rights-of-way be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. (Specifically, access to CR 193 and Sunset Point Road); 2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, a final plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County (Development Code 4-708); I FRANK BBBARD, MAYOR BII.I. JONSON, VICE-MAYOR JOHN DOR1N, COUNCILMEMIIF.R HOYr HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMm-R CARLEN A. Pf.TERSEN, COUNCILMF,MBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMEN'C AND AFFIRMATIVI? ACTION EMPI.OYI?R" September 13, 2005 FLS2005-03025 - Page Two 3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, provide a recorded copy of a 15 foot sanitary sewer', easement allowing access to the existing manhole locate at the southwest end of the adjacent property to the east, to the Engineering Department; 4. That the vehicle access gates be relocated to provide a minimum spacing of 40 feet from the back edge of sidewalk to the gate face to provide for vehicle stacking; and 5. That prior to Certificate of Occupancy, all transportation impact fees be paid. I concur with the findings of the Development Review Committee and, through this letter, approve your application for Flexible Standard Development with the above five conditions. The approval is based on and must adhere to the application dated received March 31, 2005 and the revised site plans dated received June 6, 2005. Pursuant to Section 4-303, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Standard Development approval (September 12, 2006). All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within one year of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call John Schodtler, Planner I, at 727-562-4547. You can access zoning for parcels within the City through our website: www.myclearwater.com. Make Us Your Favorite I inc'ne?relyl, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director r S:W1anning Department1C D BIF1ex Standard (FLS)Wending CaseA2 -Reviewed and PendingISunset Point Rd 2945 (Imdr) awaiting resub JVSIFLS2005-03025 Development Order.doc 4 4 T F Southwest Florida - 9 Water Management District An Equal Opportunity Employer Watson L Haynes 11 Chair, Pinellas Heidi B. McCrea Vice Chair, Hillsborough Judith C. Whitehead Secretary, Hernando Talmadge G. "Jerry" Rice Treasurer, Pasco Edward W. Chance Manatee Jennifer E. Closshey Hillsborough Neil Combee Polk Thomas G. Dabney Sarasota Janet D. Kovach Hillsborough Todd Pressman Pinellas Patsy C. Symons Desoto David L Moore Executive Director Gene A. Heath Assistant Executive Director William S. Bilenky General Counsel bSo$ - ooZ-1. '3o, 64- 2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 r ??!?S? ? l..rvl (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) SUNCOM 628-4150 TDD only 1-800-231-6103 (FL only) On the Internet at. WaterMatters.org Bartow Service Office Lecanto Service Office Sarasota Service Office Tampa Service Office 170 Century Boulevard 3600 West Sovereign Path 6750 Fruitville Road 7601 Highway 301 North Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 Suite 226 Sarasota, Florida 34240.9711 Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (863) 534-1448 or Lecanto, Florida 34461-8070 (941) 377-3722 or (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) (352) 527-8131 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) SUNCOM 572-6200 SUNCOM 667-3271 SUNCOM 531-6900 SUNCOM 578-2070 May 18, 2005 Il E ?r I E O V-1-1 4 i) F N 0 6 ?065 Stephanie D. Dieters Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. PLAn +?(G 117EVELOPIu?ENT SVGS f^cn . GLEARw4rER 9020 Rancho Del Rio Drive ? New Port Richey, FL 34655 Subject: Notice of Final Agency Action for Approval ERP General for Minor Systems Permit No. 46028645.000 Project Name: Sunset Pointe Subdivision County: Pinellas Sec/Twp/Rge: 05/29S/1 6E Dear Ms. Dieters: This letter constitutes notice of Final Agency Action for approval of the permit referenced above. Final approval is contingent upon no objection to the District's action being received by the District within the time frames described below. You or any person whose substantial interests are affected by the District's action regarding a permit may request an administrative hearing in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statute (F.S.), and Chapter 28-106, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), of the Uniform Rules of Procedure. A request for hearing must: (1) explain how the substantial interests of each person requesting the hearing will be affected by the District's action, or proposed action, (2) state all material facts disputed by the person requesting the hearing or state that there are no disputed facts, and (3) otherwise comply with Chapter 28-106, F.A.C. Copies of Sections 28-106.201 and 28-106.301, F.A.C. are enclosed for your reference. A request for hearing must be filed with (received by) the Agency Clerk of the District at the District's Brooksville address within 21 days of receipt of this notice. Receipt is deemed to be the fifth day after the date on which this notice is deposited in the United States mail. Failure to file a request for hearing within this time period shall constitute a waiver of any right you or such person may have to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, F.S. Mediation pursuant to Section 120.573, F.S., to settle an administrative dispute regarding the District's action in this matter is not available prior to the filing of a request for hearing. Enclosed is a "Noticing Packet" that provides information regarding the District Rule 40D-1.1010, F.A.C., which addresses the notification of persons whose substantial interests may be affected by the District's action in this matter. The packet contains guidelines on how to provide notice of the District's action, and a notice that you may use. The enclosed approved construction plans are part of the permit, and construction must be in accordance with these plans. SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE GENERAL FOR MINOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS . PERMIT NO. 46028645.000 Expiration Date: May 18, 2010 Issue Date: May 18, 2005 This permit is issued under the provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes (F.S.) and the Rules contained in Chapters 40D-4 and 4013-40, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The permit authorizes the Permittee to proceed with construction of a surface water management system in accordance with the information outlined herein and shown by the application, approved drawings, plans, specifications, and other documents, attached hereto and kept on file at the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District). Unless otherwise stated by permit specific condition, permit issuance constitutes certification of compliance with state water quality standards under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341. All construction, operation and maintenance of the surface water management system authorized by this permit shall occur in compliance with Florida Statutes and Administrative Code and the conditions of this permit. PROJECT NAME: Sunset Pointe Subdivision GRANTED TO: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. 9020 Rancho Del Rio Drive New Port Richey, FL 34655 ABSTRACT: This permit authorizes the construction of a 3.21 acre residential project, including fourteen (14) homeowners' lots, a road, and the associated stormwater management facilities. Runoff from the project area is conveyed to the proposed stormwater pond via storm inlets. Water quality treatment is provided in the pond through effluent filtration. The site is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Sunset Point Road and County Road 193, in Pinellas County, Florida. OP. & MAINT. ENTITY: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. COUNTY: Pinellas SEC/TWP/RGE: 05/29S/16E TOTAL ACRES OWNED OR UNDER CONTROL: 3.21 PROJECT SIZE: 3.21 Acres LAND USE: Residential DATE APPLICATION FILED: March 31, 2005 AMENDED DATE: N/A SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1. If the ownership of the project area covered by the subject permit is divided, with someone other than the Permittee becoming the owner of part of the project area, this permit shall terminate, pursuant to Section 40D-1.6105, F.A.C. In such situations, each land owner shall obtain a permit (which may be a modification of this permit) for the land owned by that person. This condition shall not apply to the division and sale of lots or units in residential subdivisions or condominiums. Permit No.: 46028645.000 Page 3 May 18, 2005 9. Prior to installation of the filter media, the Permittee's contractor shall submit a certified test of the media to the Permittee's Professional Engineer and the District. The test shall address the following parameters: uniformity coefficient, effective grain size, sieve analysis, percent silts, clays and organic matter, and permeability testing (constant head). If testing indicates the actual permeability rate is less than the value specified in the permitted design, a permit modification will be required to lengthen the effluent filtration system. The Permittee shall also notify the Surface Water Regulation Manager, Tampa Regulation Department, at least 48 hours prior to commencement of construction of the effluent filtration system, so that District staff may observe this construction activity. 10. If limestone bedrock is encountered during construction of the surface water management system, the District must be notified and construction in the affected area shall cease. 11. The Permittee shall notify the District of any sinkhole development in the surface water management system within 48 hours of discovery and must submit a detailed sinkhole evaluation and repair plan for approval by the District within 30 days of discovery. 12. The District, upon prior notice to the Permittee, may conduct on-site inspections to assess the effectiveness of the erosion control barriers and other measures employed to prevent violations of state water quality standards and avoid downstream impacts. Such barriers or other measures should control discharges, erosion, and sediment transport during construction and thereafter. The District will also determine any potential environmental problems that may develop as a result of leaving or removing the barriers and other measures during construction or after construction of the project has been completed. The Permittee must provide any remedial measures that are needed. 13. This permit is issued based upon the Permittee's certification that the surface water management system meets all applicable rules and specifications, including the Conditions for Issuance of Permits provided in Rule 40D-40.301(1), F.A.C. If at any time it is determined by the District that the Conditions for Issuance have not been met, upon written notice. by the District, the Permittee shall obtain a permit modification and perform any construction necessary thereunder to correct any deficiencies in the system design or construction to meet District rule criteria. The Permittee is advised that the correction of deficiencies may require re-construction of the surface water management system. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The general conditions attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are hereby incorporated into this permit by reference and the Permittee shall comply with them. Authorized Signature N lo)( 14 ?L r i r IMK I L44 rr i Ftoc12 - I A-70 e,--v ?- - 1314.5F. ArTr 3? _ 5- o sr' TZM L G - ? IrAm I LY _$F5 .. 4? G. . t k.-am-w- .rrsw .. - I t d N 1 t i .1 1 1 ?tkS?T t L., .r ., Ir/ Pot . 0 JJ1 I'Jy- I o 4 I 10 RXLO 32y 0- s ? VA 0 ?P i ` 21?xto[ , f4?2a I Q t8xto F i I I I \J I ?? 12 ? . Y,?,???M ILY ?1 th le CAN l9rA % 1 ST 18r 59. ?J7 V7 ?I ?yJ 57zn: Nor 1 r t t - - mi- ,1 C? rr A =311811MMIM 6 0, Sep. 15 2005 10:15AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98483648 Sep.15 10:14AM 01'12 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329]. DRC Meeting Date: May 5, 2005 Case Number: FLS2005-03025/PLT2005-00007 Owner/Applicant: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. Address: 2945 Sunset Point Road CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (Sunrise Drive) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 to the building; a front (north) setback reduction (Sunset Point Road) from 25 feet to 15 to the building; a front (west) setback reduction (CR 193) from 25 feet to 20 to the building; and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in required structural setback adjacent to a public right of way, per Section 2-203.C. Also included in the request is Preliminary Plat approval on PLT2005-00007. EXISTING ZONING Low Medium Density Residential District (LMDR) LAND USE: Residential Low Classification (RL) PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Single-Family Residential Proposed Use: 14 Single-Family Residential Units ADJACENT/ZONING LAND USES: North: Single-family residential West: Single-family residential East: Single-family residential South: Single-family residential CHARACTER OF THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY: Single-family dwellings with maintained landscaping and site work dominate the immediate vicinity. ANALYSIS: The 3.21 acres is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Sunset Point Road and CR 193. The parcel is located within a residentially developed area of single-family homes that are primarily not located with in the City of Clearwater's jurisdiction and exceed the minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 square feet. S:Tlanning DepartmentlC D BTlex Standard (FLS)IPending CasesQ - Reviewed and PendinglSunset Point Rd 2945 (lmdr) awaiting resub JYSISunset Point 2945 StafJ'Report.doc 0 0 The characteristics of the single-family home lots located in the immediate vicinity are a mixture of City of Clearwater and Unincorporated Pinellas County properties. The unincorporated properties are un-platted metes and bounds lots and average over an acre (43,560 square feet) in lot area. The residential lots located within the City of Clearwater are platted and average 18,000 square feet in size. The lot widths on all properties are on average 80 feet in width. Provision of adequate building sites will be provided for the proposed single-family residences. It appears that the subdivision will provide adequate and convenient traffic access and circulation after the access gates are revised to meet the Fire and Engineering departments' revisions. While the lots proposed in the subdivision (Preliminary Plat) comply with the minimum lot size and lot width requirements for single-family homes located in the LMDR district, the lots are smaller in size than those adjacent and also in the immediate vicinity. The proposed double frontage lots paralleling Sunset Point Road, which is an arterial road, are acceptable per the Subdivision Design Standards. In addition the applicant has request a five foot restrictive access easement preventing any access directly to the Sunset Point Road property lines. The proposed landscaped easements located in the Common Area along the CR193 right of way, more specifically lots 1 and 14 have been designed to by design what cannot be done by right. These lots (1 & 14) are considered corner lots with a reduced front setback of 20 feet from the CR 193 right of way property line, where the minimum setback required is 25 foot. The characteristics of the single-family homes located in the immediate vicinity are a mixture of single story and multi-story and they average between 2,000 - 4,000 square feet in gross floor area. All homes in the immediate vicinity are well maintained and landscaped. The applicant has submitted two separate typical house plans, but expects that most of the homes will be custom built and meet the proposed requests for setbacks. No submittal for pools or decks has been submitted, but the applicant expects they will be requested at a later date and will meet minimum standard code. The characteristics of fencing located in the immediate vicinity are a mixture of aluminum, chain link, and columns. The residential properties located on the north side of Sunset Point Road typically have a six-foot tall fence consisting of brick or masonry columns with substantial grillwork and landscaping along their frontages and the properties along the south of Sunset Point Road have no fencing. The residential properties located along CR193 typically have four foot chain link or aluminum fencing or no fencing at all. It should be noted that the properties located along CR193 are not located with in the City of Clearwater's jurisdiction and are not required to comply with the City's fence codes. The applicant has requested for the subdivision to be a gated community with six foot tall fencing and walls around the perimeter of the subdivision. The current fencing proposal does not comply with code but is consistent with the characteristics of the adjacent properties and the immediate vicinity. S:Wlanning DepartmentlC D BIFlex Standard (FLS)Wending Casesl2 - Reviewed and PendinglSunset Point Rd 2945 (lmdr) awaiting resub JVSISunset Point 2945 StafjReport.doc 0 • A letter of objection was received from the adjacent property owner to the east. Concerns are the fence/wall along his property line and the tree branches overhanging his property. All applicable Code requirements and criteria including but not limited to General Applicability criteria (Section 3-913.A) and Residential Infill Projects in the IEOD district: (Section 2-1602.E): have been met. CODE ENFORCEMENT ANALYSIS: There are no outstanding enforcement issues associated with this site. GENERAL STANDARDS (Section 3-913): Consistent Inconsistent 1. Development of the land will be in harmony with the Yes, see scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent analysis properties. 2. Development will not hinder or discourage development Yes and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. 3. Development will not adversely affect the health or safety Yes of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. Development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. Yes 5. Development is consistent with the community character Yes, see of the immediate vicinity. analysis 6. Design of the proposed development minimizes adverse Yes effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA FOR LMDR DISTRICT RESIDENTIAL INFILL PROJECTS: (Section 2-203.C): 1. Single-family detached dwellings are the only permitted use eligible for residential infill project application; 2. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the intensity and other development standards; 3. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a residential infill project will not materially reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; 4. The uses within the residential infill project are otherwise permitted in the district; Consistent Inconsistent Yes Yes Yes Yes S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Wending Casesl2 -Reviewed and PendinglSunset Point Rd 2945 (lmdr) awaiting resub JVSISunset Point 2945 Staff Report. doc 0 u 5. The uses within the residential infill project are Yes compatible with adjacent land uses; 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development Yes as a residential infill project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; 7. The design of the proposed residential infill project Yes creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; and 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, Yes height, off-street parking, access or other development standards is justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee reviewed the application and supporting materials on December 23, 2003. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single-family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (Sunrise Drive) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 feet (to the building); a front (north) setback reduction (Sunset Point Road) from 25 feet to 15 (to the building); and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in required structural setback adjacent to a public right of way, per Section 2-203.C. Also included in the request is Preliminary Plat approval on PLT2005-00007, on the following bases and conditions: Bases for Approval: 1. The proposal does comply with the Flexible Standard Development criteria as a Residential Infill Project, per Section 2-203.C. 2. The proposal is in compliance with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913. 3. The development is compatible with the surrounding area and will enhance other redevelopment efforts. Conditions of Approval: 1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the gate located on Sunset Point Road comply with the forty foot spacing/stacking requirement; 2. That a final plat be recorded with Pinellas County prior to issuance of building permit; 3. That approved right-of-way permits from Pinellas County for any work in county rights-of-way are required prior to issuance of a building permit; Prepared by: Planning Department Staff: John Schodtler, Planner I S:Wlanning DepartmentlC D BlFlex Standard (FLS)Wending Casesl2 - Reviewed and PendinglSunset Point Rd 2945 (lmdr) awaiting resub JVYSunset Point 2945 StaffReport.doc • FLORIDA DES/WNCONSULTANTS, INC. Civil Engineering - Surveying - Transportation Planning & Engineering - Land Planning - Environmental - Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 August 18, 2005 Mr. John Schodtler City of Clearwater City Municipal Services Building Planning and Dev't. Services 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Sunset Pointe Sub. FLS 2005-03025 PTL 2005-00007 A s T 10-14 6 TA Ga?'s / e / 4V l,v ,/.?--FG2•? i 0Z- - +. ,. A 44rws + 5-7 1 Tk--'M 1G,GS , + ,? ?F + ?-- 'Ta P G Dear John: It is our contention that by virtue of Tract "A" providing a 10 ft. wide wall and landscape easement, lots 1 and 14 become "interior" lots. As "interior lots, they are subject to a 5 ft. side setback along the west side of the lot. Our client prefers the current mix of 65 ft. and 70 ft. lots since it would allow for a greater variety of floor plans to be provided to the potential customers. The outcome would be a more pleasing community. Should you disagree with our interpretation of "interior" lots vs. "corner" lot, we ask that a variance be granted on the west side setback to reduce it from 25 feet to 15 ft. (from the right-of-way of C.R. 193). Your prompt response to this request would be greatly appreciated as the Final Plat has been submitted for review by the City. Sincerely, Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Senior Project Manager Enclosures :c Stephanie Deeb, Deeb Construction & Development, w/o encl. Tom Mahony, PLS, w/o encl. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC, w/o encl. Robert Wright, Jr., PLS, FDC, w/o encl. File: 508-27-00.20 :Jmr K:\Sunset Point\Letters\Schodtler.02.doc 3030 Starkey Boulevard - New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 - Fax: (727) 848-3648 - (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com • Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 August 18, 2005 Mr. Thomas Mahony, PSM City of Clearwater Public Works Administration Geographic Technology/Survey 410 Myrtle Ave. North Clearwater, FL 33755 Re: Sunset Pointe - Final Plat File 508-27-00.20 Dear Mr. Mahony: Enclosed for your review and approval are the following documents: 1. Four (4) copies of the Final Plat. 2. Two (2) copies of the Boundary Survey. 3. Review fee check in the amount of $300.00. 4. Copy of Warranty Deed. 5. Copy of Mortgage Assignment. 6. Copy of Consent to Plat. 7. Copy of O&E Report from First American Title Insurance Company. 8. Copy of Final Plat Checklist. Should you require any additional documentation please call me at 849-7588. Sincerely, Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Senior Project Manager Enclosures :c Stephanie Deeb, Deeb Construction & Development, w/o encl. John Shodtler, Planning Dept., City Of Clearwater, w/o encl. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC, w/o encl. Robert Wright, Jr., PLS, FDC, w/o encl. File 508-27-00.20 :jmr.K:\Sunset Point\Letters\mahony.doc 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 9 (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com 0 0 Schodtler, John From: Albee, Rick Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 11:36 AM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Kurleman, Scott; Thompson, Neil; Delk, Michael Subject: RE: FLS2005-03025 - 2945 Sunset Point Road On Friday, Scott Kurleman, Alan Mayberry, (Boen's Tree Service), Mr. Diechman and myself reassessed the trees condition. The consensus was that my first option of that the tree has some problems and should not be preserved were correct and that I will stand by my decision to allow the tree to be removed with the proposed construction. Mr. Diechman will not be pleased with this decision and will probably continue to fight for its preservation. If management decides to entertain the preservation of the tree some additional study will be needed, a resist-o-graph reading and the field staking of the proposed roadway to determine the modifications needed of the exit road and retention pond. Please advise if any additional information is needed. -----Original Message----- From: Schodtler, John Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 2:40 PM To: Albee, Rick Subject: RE: FLS2005-03025 - 2945 Sunset Point Road Cool. -----Original Message----- From: Albee, Rick Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 1:44 PM To: Schodtler, John Cc: Thompson, Neil; Kurleman, Scott Subject: RE: FLS2005-03025 - 2945 Sunset Point Road I want to get a second opinion from Scott Kurleman and maybe another arborist. Should be able to finalize my position by Friday 6/17/05. -----Original Message----- From: Schodtler, John Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 9:33 AM To: Albee, Rick Subject: FW: FLS2005-03025 - 2945 Sunset Point Road Rick, what is going on with the tree. Is it staying, is it being removed? Have you called the developer to ask them to redo the plans? Other departments are asking what's going on. C Schodtler, John From: Albee, Rick Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 2:21 PM To: Wilson, Denise; Petrie,Todd; Rice, Scott Cc: Delk, Michael; Pullin, Sharon; Phillips, Sue; Thompson, Neil; Kurleman, Scott; Schodtler, John Subject: RE: Councilmember Request Denise, Neil Thompson and myself met with Mr. Jonson a week or so ago to address the Oak tree that Mr. Diechman was concerned about. No discussion was had involving the removal of all of the trees on that site. I went into my initial review of the plans with this concern in mind and resolved that the site is mostly Water Oaks, Sand Pines and Slash Pines. These species do not tolerate major construction impacts. Sixty percent of each lot is build able, there is only ten feet between structures. Ten feet is not enough room to preserve trees. The subdivision also has multiple utilities in the front setbacks that generally have severe impacts on root systems. The remainder of the lot is required to convey stormwater, again severe root impacts. I thought it would be best to allow the removal of all of the trees and replant site specific species that meet the Florida Grades and Standards criteria. This should develop into a healthy urban forest. If there is any further justification required please do not hesitate to ask. -----Original Message----- From: Wilson, Denise Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 11:24 AM To: Petrie,Todd; Rice, Scott; Albee, Rick Cc: Delk, Michael; Pullin, Sharon; Phillips, Sue Subject: RE: Councilmember Request Rick: Please see my initial email. Did you contact Councilmember Jonson re the tree issue? Denise -----Original Message----- From: Petrie,Todd Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 7:44 AM To: Wilson, Denise; Rice, Scott; Albee, Rick Cc: Delk, Michael; Pullin, Sharon; Phillips, Sue Subject: RE: Councilmember Request Scott, Rick: I am not sure if this item has been resolved or if there are still questions regarding the site. Apparently there are concerns from Councilmember Jonson and Mr. Diekmann (791-6267) regarding removal of a tree at 2945 Sunset for a housing development. According to an email from Rick, the tree concern was addressed on May 25. The site is a private development in process and not an issue Utilities would handle. Can you contact Denise and/or Sue and determine if there still are questions or if they have been resolved? Thanks for your help. -----Original Message----- From: Wilson, Denise Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 9:35 AM To: Petrie,Todd Cc: Delk, Michael; Pullin, Sharon Subject: Councilmember Request Importance: High Todd: Assistant City Manager Garry Brumback asked that I return to you the information on the property located at 2945 Sunset Point Road (sent in the interoffice mail). Councilmember Jonson still would like for you to explain the rationale for "clearing" all of the tress on this site. Please contact Councilmember Jonson. The best number to reach him is on his cell - 224-7156. 0 0 Please provide me an update once you have spoken to the Councilmember. Thanks. Denise r IlII4 Land Resource Condition 40 Conditioriis Associated WitFi FLS2005-03025 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Rick Albee 05/02/2005 Remove the "Ribbon" tree barricade detail prior to Building permit. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4741 562-4775 Not Met 04/15/2005 1. The location of gates must be at a minimum of 40' from back edge of sidewalk to the face of Not Met gate. This is to allow for visiting motorists, service trucks and moving trucks to stage when gate is not opened. 6/8/05 - THE GATE ON THE DRIVEWAY TO SUNSET POINT ROAD DOES NOT HAVE 40-FOOT SPACING. SINCE THIS GATE WILL BE USED BY SOLID WASTE IT MUST HAVE PROPER STACKING SPACE. THIS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. Address all of the above conditions prior to a D.O.. 1. Prior to building permit, provide an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County or FDOT for any work in a county or state right-of-way. ACKNOWLEDGED General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a C.O. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4547 06/21/2005 Have not received Preliminary Plat revisions that are an integral part of this project. - S Fes- !o-t`f?a? ? 'e 06/22/2005 Page 1 of 1 Not Met CaseConditons ? ? ?' '? t •? Conditions Associated Wi ? PLT2005-00007 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 04/22/2005 1. Show U.S. section, township and range lines on the preliminary plat. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4576 Not Met 562-4547 04/28/2005 Parcels B and C do not comply with the minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 s.f. It appears you Not Met are trying to do by design what you can not do by right. Staff suggest an acceptable alternative would be to reduce the 70 foot wide lots to 65 feet in width and remove the "landscape" parcels B and C. This would provide lots 1 and 14 with the minimum required 25 foot front setbacks from CR139. Print Date: 06/22/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 1 Clearwater U FAX COVER MEMO CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S. MYRTLE AVE., 2nd Floor CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: 0.6. FAX:- Phone: FROM• '::3-c> 11 n S. Phone: DATE: Np .:)La ©.? SUBJECT: ?9 `t-'s Si v 0, 12,R MESSAGE: 4' 6SE C-6A4 E-5yJ -S NUMBER OF PAGES(INCLUDING THIS PAGE) --3 ? r Jun. 22 2005 11:01AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98483648 Jun.22 11:00AM 01'09 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). OR16INAL ,r INC. ORinaDESIGN toNSUI raKS F1 Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 May 31, 2005 Mr. John Schodtler City of Clearwater City Municipal Services Building Planning and Dev't. Services 100 S. Myrtle Avenue, 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Re: Sunset Point Road Case Number FLS2005-03025 Dear Mr. Schodtler: This letter is sent in response to the comments received for the above reference project. To facilitate your review, the comments are restated below (in bold) followed by our responses. General Engineering: Comment No. 1: Prior to building permit. 1. Provide recorded copy of 15 ft. sanitary sewer easement which allows subject parcel access to existing manhole. Response No. 1: Developer will provide a copy of the recorded sanitary sewer easement, under separate cover. Comment No. 2: Fire hydrant lines greater than 10 ft. in length shall be constructed of ductile iron pipe. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. Detail A has been revised as requested, and a note to this effect has been added to sheet 7 of 12. Comment No. 3: Approved right-of-way permits from Pinellas County for any work in county rights-of-way are required prior to issuance of a building permit. (Specifically, access to CR 193 and Sunset Point Road and fencing proposed in CR 193 right- of-way). Response No. 3: Right-of-way utilization permits have been submitted for both the driveway connection and the water main connections. Copies will be provided to the City when the permits are approved. 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com Mr. John Schodder May 31, 2005 Page 2 Comment No. 4: The City of Clearwater, at applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any water meters that have to be removed or relocated as part of this development. Response No. 4: Acknowledged. Comment No. 5: Final plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County (Development Code 4-708). General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Response No. 5: Acknowledged. Comments will be addressed as they are received. Environmental: Comment No. 1 No issues Response No. 1: Acknowledged. Fire: Comment No. 1: Fire hydrants must be provided within 500 ft. of the most remote point of every residence. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. A fire hydrant assembly (FHA) is located within 500 ft of the most remote point of every residence. Comment No. 2: Any single family residence of 3 or more stories must have a fire sprinkler system. Please respond PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 2: Acknowledged. A note has been added to this effect on sheet 6 of 12. Comment No. 3: Ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes. Please respond PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 3: Florida Design Consultants has requested fire flow data from City of Clearwater Utilities. Copy of their results will be provided for review upon receipt. Mr. John Schodder May 31, 2005 Page 3 • 0 Comment No. 4: Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledged PRIOR to D.O. Response No. 4: Acknowledged. A note to this effect has been added to sheet 6 of 12 Comment No. 5: Install gate type lock boxes as per County Ordinance No. 98-4. Applications for lock boxes are available at the Life Safety Building of Clearwater Fire and Rescue, 600 Franklin St., Clearwater. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 5: Acknowledged. The gates will have lock boxes per County Ordinance No. 98-4. Comment No. 6: Provide 24 ft wide roadway for fire department and emergency vehicle access. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 6: Acknowledged. The roadway within this project is shown and called out as 24' wide. Please refer to the typical street section on sheet 3 of 12. Comment No. 7: Show the FDC for any building that is required to be protected by a fire sprinkler system at least 15 away from the building and within 40 feet of a fire hydrant. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 7: Acknowledged. FDCs have been shown at least 15 feet from each building and within 40 feet of FHAs on sheet 6 of 12. Comment No. 8: Provide minimum 28 ft turning radii for fire department and emergency vehicle ingress and egress. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Response No. 8: Acknowledged. A 35' turning radius is provided for the driveway on C.R. 193. An emergency vehicle can use both lanes at the emergency exit on to C.R. 578, which exceeds the requested 28 ft. minimum radius. Harbor Master: No Comments Legal: No Comments Response: Acknowledged. • • Mr. John Schodtler May 31, 2005 Page 4 Land Resources: Comment No. 1: Remove the "Ribbon" tree barricade detail prior to Building permit. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. The "Ribbon" tree barricade detail has been removed from the Construction Plans. Comment No. 2: The tree inventory lists tree #71-74 and #139-145 twice, verify accuracy of the inventory prior to Building permit. Response No. 2: First set of #71-74 (Laurel Oak) has been revised to #171-174, per review of field notes. Numbers 139-145 were duplicated within chart and have been revised. Landscaping: Comment No. 1: In the retention pond area the use of Red Maple, bald and pond cypress is recommended. Response No. 1: Plans have been revised to include Red Maple and Cypress at retention pond area. Comment No. 2: The property owner shall, within 30 days, plant a hedge or other solid landscape buffer on the outside of the fence/wall parallel to the two street right of ways. The buffer shall consist of shrubs at least 18 inches in height at the time of planting. The plan indicates portions of a hedge on the interior of the proposed wall or fence. Revise plans for review. Response No. 2: Plans have been revised to indicate shrubs on outside of fence/wall along right-of- way. Comment No. 3: The plans propose the removal of most if not all of the trees on this parcel and a replacement of primarily one species. The use of the Live Oaks in the northern line along Sunset Point Rd. should be reconsidered, these trees planted so close to a wall will create problems in the future. The use of a variety of trees is strongly recommended to avoid diseases or pests spreading through a monoculture of trees. Response No. 3: It was understood that City of Clearwater prefers live oaks, especially along a scenic corridor. The trees have been revised to Florida Elm and Red Maple. The plan currently indicated 12 Live Oaks and 43 other trees of various species to provide diversity of plant material. The variety is shown to allow the homeowner a choice in trees to be used on the individual lot. • • Mr. John Schodtler May 31, 2005 Page 5 Parks and Recreation: Comment No. 1: Open Space impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permit or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Response No. 1: Stormwater: Comment No. 1: Response No. 1: Solid Waste: No Comments Response Traffic Engineering: Developer will contact Art Kader to resolve the open space/recreation impact fees directly with that department. Prior to building permit: 1) Please provide copy of County drainage connection permit. The drainage connection permit in question is included within the Right-of-Way Utilization Permit for the driveway connections. See attached applications. Acknowledged. Comment No. 1: 1. The location of gates must be at a minimum of 40' from back edge of sidewalk to the face of gate. This is to allow for visiting motorists, service trucks and moving trucks to stage when gate is not opened. Address all of the above conditions prior to a D.O. 1. Prior to building permit, provide an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County or FDOT for any work in a county or state right-of-way. General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a D.O. Response No. 1: Acknowledged. The gates on the driveway to C.R. 193 are 40 ft. from the proposed sidewalks. The gate on the driveway to C.R. 578 will not be used by the residents (emergency access only) and therefore does not provide the requested 40' offset. y ? • Mr. John Schodtler May 31, 2005 Page 6 Planning: Comment No. 1: Revise site plan to provide driveway locations for each lot, not a typical. In particular the lots located nearest the entrance with the proposed gates. Response No. 1: The site plan (sheet 3 of 12) has been revised to show the location of the driveways for the lots that are adjacent to the entrance/exit gate. Comment No. 2: Any fence or wall that exceeds three feet in height and is located within any required structural setback adjacent to a public right-of-way shall provide a three feet wide landscaped strip on the street side of the fence. Also, if the landscape buffer incorporates the use of a fence or wall, access for maintenance purposes shall be provided to the secondary street (Sunset Point Road) from each lot. Revise all site plans. Response No. 2: Plans have been revised to allow the 3' wide landscape strip along the street side of the fence. Access gates are shown on sheet 3 of 12. Comment No. 3: Clarify general applicability criteria regarding the proposed six foot wall/fence along Sunset Point Road and CR 193. Staff did not find a characteristic of six foot wall along CR 193 and fences along Sunset Point Road are constructed out of columns with substantial grill work. (Double frontage lots. For the purposes of fence placement on double frontage lots, the front yard shall be the side of the property from which the property is addressed. The placement of any fence on this side of the property shall adhere to the front setback provisions in Section 3- 804(A) above. The other side of the property shall be considered a rear yard. A fence may be erected in compliance with the rear yard setback provisions in Section 3-804(B) above provided the following conditions exist: 1. The rear yards of the adjacent lots on the same side of the street are oriented the same as the lot on which the fence is proposed; and 2. The pattern of the dwellings across the street is also oriented with the rear yard facing the lots across the street. 3. If both of these conditions can not be met, such fence in the rear setback shall not exceed three feet in height.) Response No. 3: The fence/wall will be 6' in height based on comments from City of Clearwater DRC meeting and the developers agreement to create the fence/wall from open, metal pickets with solid wall segments. See plans for typical elevations. Mr. John Schodder May 31, 2005 Page 7 Other: No Comments No response required. If you or any member of your staff has any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, Octa*Carera, P.E. Senior Project Manager :c Stephanie D. Dieters, Deeb Family Homes, Ltd., w/encl. Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC, w/o encl. File 508-27-40.01 :cpK:\Sunset Point\Letters\deeb.02.doc ?J Clearwater Fax Cover Sheet 46 City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave., 2nd Floor Clearwater, FL 33756 Telephone: (727) 562-4567 Fax: (727) 562-4865 To: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Fax: 727-848-3648 Phone: 727-849-7588 From: Sherry Watkins Date: 05/2/2005 Subject: DRC Comment & Meeting Time 9:25 AM Message: Your DRC meeting time is 9:25am FLS2005-03025 - PLT2005-00007 - 2945 Sunset Point Road John Sc?)o cat let' Number of pages including cover sheet CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 4748, Clearwater, Florida 33758-4748 Municipal Services Building, 100 South Myrtle Avenue, Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone (727) 562-4567 Fax (727) 562-4576 May 02, 2005 FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC., 3030 STARKEY BLVD NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34655 RE: FLS2005-03025 LOCATED AT 2945 SUNSET POINT RD - SUNSET POINT SUB Dear FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC.: The following are comments generated at the City's Pre-Development Review Committee (PRE-DRC) meeting regarding your case number: FLS2005-03025. These comments are generated early to give you assistance in preparing for the upcoming DRC Meeting on May 5, 2005. Please be prepared to address these comments and any others that may be generated at the DRC meeting. Resubmittals will not be accepted at the meeting, please make arrangements to resubmit to Sherry Watkins after the DRC meeting. If you have any questions about times or location, please contact Sherry Watkins, at 727-562-4582. Sincerely, John Schodder Planner I Cc: File 71?tf:j, Conditions Associated Wit FLS2005-03025 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Engineering Condition Steve Doherty 562-4576 04/22/2005 Prior to building permit: Not Met 1. Provide recorded copy of 15 ft. sanitary sewer easement which allows subject parcel access to existing manhole. 2. Fire hydrant lines greater than 10 ft. in length shall be constructed of ductile iron pipe. 3, Approved right-of-way permits from Pinellas County for any work in county rights-of-way are required prior to issuance of a building permit. (Specifically, access to CR 193 and Sunset Point Road and fencing proposed in CR 193 right-of-way). 4. The City of Clearwater, at applicant's expense, will remove/relocate any water meters that have to be removed or relocated as part of this development. 5. Final plat shall be recorded with Pinellas County (Development Code 4-708). General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental Condition Heather Faessler 562-4897 04/22/2005 No Issues Not Met Fire Condition Downes Blackburn 562-4327 xt 3025 04/22/2005 Fire hydrants must be provided within 500 ft of the most remote point of every residence. Please Not Met acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. 04/22/2005 Any single family residence of 3 or more stories must have a fire sprinkler system. Please Not Met respond PRIOR TO D.O. 04/22/2005 Ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes. Please respond PRIOR TO D.O. Not Met 04/22/2005 Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, Not Met completed, and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. 04/22/2005 Install gate type lock boxes as per County Ordinance No. 98-4. Applications for lock boxes are Not Met available at the Life Safety Building of Clearwater Fire and Rescue, 600 Franklin St., Clearwater. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. 04/22/2005 Provide 24 ft wide roadway for fire department and emergency vehicle access. Please Not Met acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. 04/22/2005 Show the FDC for any building that is required to be protected by a fire sprinkler system at least Not Met 15 away from the building and within 40 feet of a fire hydrant. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. 04/22/2005 Provide minimum 28 ft turning radii for fire department and emergency vehicle ingress and Not Met egress. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO D.O. Landscape Arden Dittmer 562-4604 04/25/2005 In the retention pond area the use of Red Maple, bald and pond cypress is recommended. Not Met 04/25/2005 The property owner shall, within 30 days, plant a hedge or other solid landscape buffer on the Not Met outside of the fence/wall parallel to the two street right of ways. The buffer shall consist of shrubs at least 18 inches in height at the time of planting. The plan indicates portions of a hedge on the, interior of the proposed wall or fence. Revise plans for review. Print Date: 05/02/2005 CaseConditons Page 1 of 3 • 0 FLS2005-03025 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Landscape Arden Dittmer 562-4604 04/25/2005 The plans propose the removl of most if not all of the trees on this parcel and a replacement of Not Met primarily one species. The use of the Live Oaks in the northern line along Sunset Point Rd. should be reconsidered, these trees planted so close to a wall will create problems in the future. The use of a variety of trees is strongly recommended to avoid diseases or pests spreading through a monoculture of trees. Land Resource Condition Rick Albee 562-4741 05/0212005 Remove the "Ribbon" tree barricade detail prior to Building permit. 05/02/2005 The tree inventory lists tree #71-74 and #139-145 twice, verify accuracy of the inventory prior to Building permit. Parks & Recs Condition Open Space impact fees are due prior to issueance of building permit or final plat (if applicable), whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Storm Water Condition Prior to building permit: 1) Please provide copy of County drainage connection permit. Traffic Eng Condition Bennett Elbo 562-4775 Not Met Not Met Not Met Not Met 04/15/2005 1. The location of gates must be at a minimum of 40' from back edge of sidewalk to the face of Not Met gate. This is to allow for visiting motorists, service trucks and moving trucks to stage when gate is not opened. Address all of the above conditions prior to a D.O.. 1. Prior to building permit, provide an approved right-of-way permit from Pinellas County or FDOT for any work in a county or state right-of-way. General note: Transportation impact fees to be determined and paid prior to a D.O.. Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4604 04/11/2005 Revise site plan to provide driveway locations for each lot, not a typical. In particular the lots Not Met located nearest the entrances with the proposed gates. 04/28/2005 Any fence or wall that exceeds three feet in height and is located within any required structural Not Met setback adjacent to a public right-of-way shall provide a three feet wide landscaped strip on the street side of the fence. Also, If the landscape buffer incorporates the use of a fence or wall, access for maintenance purposes shall be provided to the secondary street (Sunset Point Road) from each lot. Revise all site plans. 04/28/2005 Clarify general applicability criteria regarding the proposed six foot wall/fence along Sunset Point Not Met Road and CR139. Staff did not find a characteristic of six foot wall along CR139 and fences along Sunset Point Road are constructed out of columns with substantial grill work. (Double frontage lots. For the purposes of fence placement on double frontage lots, the front yard shall be the side of the property from which the property is addressed. The placement of any fence on this side of the property shall adhere to the front setback provisions in Section 3-804(A) above. The other side of the property shall be considered a rear yard. A fence may be erected in compliance with the Print Date: 05/02/2005 CaseConditons Page 2 of 3 • FLS2005-03025 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Zoning Condition John Schodtler 562-4604 rear yard setback provisions in Section 3-804(6) above provided the following conditions exist: 1.The rear yards of the adjacent lots on the same side of the street are oriented the same as the lot on which the fence is proposed; and 2.The pattern of the dwellings across the street is also oriented with the rear yard facing the lots across the street. 3.If both of these conditions can not be met, such fence in the rear setback shall not exceed three feet in height.) 04/28/2005 Not Met Not Met CaseConditons Print Date: 05/02/2005 Page 3 of 3 May. 02 2005 03:32PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98483648 May.02 03:31PM 01'50 SND 05 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). APR 2 2005 . L-e?,?y AIL- i -, 0 44 t LL. 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER o; > Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM April 11, 2005 RE: NOTICE OF FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FLEXIBLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 2945 SUNSET POINT RD (FLS2005-03025) To Surrounding Property Owners: As a property owner within 200 feet of 2945 SUNSET POINT RD, the City of Clearwater Planning Department gives notice that an application for Flexible Standard Development Approval for construction of 14 single family residential dwelling units, located in the Low Medium Density Residential district. The request includes a front (Sunrise Drive) setback reduction from 25 feet to 20 to the building; a front (north) setback reduction (Sunset Point Road) from 25 feet to 15 to the building; and to increase the height of a wall/fence to a maximum height of six feet in required structural setback adjacent to a public right of way, per Section 2-203.C.. On May 05, 2005, the Development Review Committee (composed of the City's professional staff) will review and determine whether the application demonstrates compliance with the City's Community Development Code. 'Following that review and determiniation, the Planning Director will issue a Development Order approving, approving with conditions, or denying the application. The earliest date that the City will make a decision on the application will be May 05, 2005. The City encourages you to participate in the review of this application. You may contact me at 727-562-4604 or John.Schodtler@myclearwater.com for further information, visit our office to review the files and/or submit written comments to be considered in the City's review of the application. Please be advised that the applicant may submit additional or new information regarding this case; which you may review during regular business hours. However, no further notice will be provided to you should the application be amended. An appeal of the decision of the Planning Director may be initiated by the applicant or property owners within the required notice area who present competent substantial evidence at, or prior to, the Development Review Committee meeting on May 05, 2005 . An appeal must be filed, including an appeal fee, with the Planning Department within seven days of the date of the Development Order. Thank you for your interest in the City of Clearwater's development review process. You may access our Planning Department through the City's website: www.myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Q C/PWXW .&kW L&', Jo n Schodtler Planner I Letter of NotVication - FLS2005-03015 - 2945 SUNSET POINT RD ? 0 cl.. 40 C CITYLARWATER > ?arwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM April 11, 2005 Florida Design Consultants, In 3030 Starkey Blvd New Port Richey, Fl 34655 RE: FLS2005-03025 -- 2945 SUNSET POINT RD -- Letter of Completeness Dear Florida Design Consultants, Inc The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-03025. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on May 05, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I Letter of Completeness - FLS2005-03025 - 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Apr.. 11 2005 01:31PM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater=Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98483648 Apr.11 01:30PM 00'50 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). 0 • Schodtler, John From: Sent: To: Subject: John: In response to 1 The average 500,000.00 The 2 The height ft, max.). Thanks, O.C. Cabrera O Cabrera [OCabrera@fldesign.com] Tuesday, April 12, 2005 3:14 PM Schodtler, John FLS2005-03025' 2945 SUNSET POINT RD your latest questions: sales value of a completed home is estimated at $ total project value is $ 7 M. of the structures will be within the maximum allowed (30 SYLVAN ABBEY MEMORIAL PARK SHARED SVC CENTER P O BOX 11250 NEW ORLEANS LA 70181 - 1250 LAMIA INVESTMENTS LLC 3090 CHARLES AVE CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3361 DAVIS, WILLIAM F DAVIS, JEAN P 2949 SUNSET POINT RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1615 ST MARY & ST MINA COPTIC ORTHO P O BOX 17566 CLEARWATER FL 33762 - 0566 WOLFE, GEORGE ROBERT JR WOLFE, MARY MICHELE 1874 CASTLE WOODS DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1808 KLINGER, SANFORD B KLINGER, DAWN E 1856 CASTLE WOODS DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1808 SYLVAN ABBEY MEMORIAL PARK SHARED SVC CENTER P O BOX 11250 NEW ORLEANS LA 70181 - 1250 KNIGHTON, ANTHONY A 2946 SUNSET POINT RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1614 UPPER PINELLAS ASSN FOR RETARD 1501 N BELCHER RD STE 249 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 1300 NEWHOUSE, JERITA JO 1886 CASTLE WOODS DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1808 RAIBLE, LEON RAIBLE, SUE 1868 CASTLE WOODS DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1808 HAMM, JOHN L JR HAMM, CAROLYN J 1850 CASTLE WOODS DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1808 to LAMIA INVESTMENTS LLC 3090 CHARLES AVE CLEARWATER FL 33761 - 3361 DIEKMANN, RONALD R 2947 SUNSET POINT RD CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1615 TABANON, YANNICK TABANON, ISABELLE 1885 COUNTY ROAD 193 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1802 BURNS, SCOTT 1880 CASTLE WOODS DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1808 HOUGH, GLENN B HOUGH, KAREN S 1862 CASTLE WOODS DR CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 1808 _ JVS 2945 Sunset Point Rd FLS2005-03025 r ? Schodtler, John From: Schodtler, John Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 11:46 AM To: 'O Cabrera' Subject: RE: FLS2005-03025 - 2945 Sunset Point Rd. Mr. Cabrera: I received and reviewed your resubmitted materials for the above mentioned case and found the following issues still remaining: Comment No.5 - Provide estimated project value of entire project Response - An estimate of the project value is enclosed. * I could not locate this in the enclosed packet. (PROVIDE ONE COPY) Comment No. 6 - Provide typical building elevations (all four sides) including height dimensions, etc... Response - Building elevations... enclosed. * The buildings heights were not labeled or dimensioned on the plans. (PROVIDE 15 COPIES) Being that these items are minor, I find it acceptable to deem this application complete. However, the above mentioned comments will need to be addressed by this Friday, April 15, 2005 (12:00 noon). John Schodtler Planner 1 1 IBM Lv.-., HaRma DESIGN CONSUL MRS, INC. Civil Engineering • Surveying • Transportation Planning & Engineering • Land Planning • Environmental • Landscape Architecture LC-26000206 April 8, 2005 Mr. John Schodtler, Planner I City of Clearwater Planning Department Municipal Services Building 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, FL 33756 Li +YVJ Re: FLS2005-03025 - 2945 Sunset Point Road - Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Schodtler: Enclosed for your review and approval are fifteen (15) copies of the revised site plan. The plan has been revised to address your comments, as follows: nmment No. 1: Provide Tree Inventory; provided by a certified arborist. Response No. 1: Enclosed is a Tree Inventory, prepared by Patrick Roberson, ISA Certified Arborist. Comment No. 2: Revise Site Data Table to include each individual lot, including the common area. Provide the following: Use, lot area, lot width, lot depth, impervious surface area %, units, density, setbacks, height, and parking. Response No. 2: Comment No. 3: Response No. 3: Comment No. 4: Response No. 4: Comment No. 5: Response No. 5: Acknowledged. Site Data Table has been revised. Revise attachment "B" to include six foot tall fence/wall in front setbacks along Sunset Point Road and C.R. 193. Acknowledged. Attachment "B" has been revised and a copy has been enclosed with this transmittal. Clarify attachment "B" request number three. A 10 foot landscaping parcel adjacent to lots 13 and 14. Don't you mean lots 1 and 14? Acknowledged. Attachment "B" has been corrected. Provide estimated project value of entire project. 3 An estimate of the project value is enclosed. APR i 1 2005 3030 Starkey Boulevard • New Port Richey, FL 34655 (727) 849-7588 • Fax: (727) 848-3648 • (800) 532-1047 www.fldesign.com Mr. John Schodtler, Planner I April 8, 2005 Page 2 Comment No. 6: E. Response No. 6: Comment No. 7: 10 16 Provide typical building elevations (all four sides) including height dimensions, to justify setback reductions. Building elevations, floor plans, etc. have been prepared by Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. Copies enclosed. Request does not indicate a request for any accessory structures such as, swimming pools, sheds, deck or patios. Clarify. Response No. 7: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. does plans to offer swimming pool/spa packages to their customers. Please refer to the building elevations and floor plans submitted with this revision. Comment No. 8: Revise site plan to provide driveway locations. Response No. 8: The site plan (sheet 3) has been revised to show the typical driveway locations, as requested. Should you require any additional information, please call me. Sincerely, Octavio Cabrera, P.E. Senior Project Manager :c Stephanie D. Dieters, Deeb Construction Edward Mazur, Jr., P.E., FDC File 508-27-10.01 :es KASunset Point\Letters\Schodder.doc ORIGINAL APR 1 1 2005 Cie., arwater April 05, 2005 Florida Design Consultants, In 3030 Starkey Blvd New Port Richey, Fl 34655 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 WWW.MYCLEARWATER.COM RE: FLS2005-03025 -- 2945 SUNSET POINT RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Florida Design Consultants, In : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLS2005-03025. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide Tree Inventory; provided by a certified arborist. 2. Revise Site Data Table to include each individual lot, including the common area. Provide the following: Use, lot area, lot width, lot depth, Impervious surface area %, units, density, setbacks, height, and parking. 3. Revise attachment "B" to include six foot tall fence/wall in front setbacks along Sunset Point Road and CR193. 4. Clarify attachment "B" request number three. A 10 foot landscaping parcel adjacent to lots 13 and 14. Don't you mean lots 1 and 14? 5. Provide estimated project value of entire project. 6. Provide typical building elevations (all four sides) including height dimsnsions, to justify setback reductions. 7. Request does not indicate a request for any accessory structures such as, swimming pools, sheds, decks or patios. Clarify. 8. Revise site plan to provide driveway locations. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Monday, April 11, 2005 (12:00 noon). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, John Schodtler Planner I V Letter of Incompleteness - FLS2005-03025 - 2945 SUNSET POINT RD Apr. 05 2005 11:27AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98483648 Apr.05 11:26AM 00'53 SND 01 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' ##04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). LL CITY OF CLEARWATER o ear Clwater PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W WW.MYCLEARWATER. COM April 05, 2005 Florida Design Consultants, Inc. 3030 Starkey Blvd New Port Richev. F134655 RE: PLT2005-00007 -- 2945 SUNSET POINT RD -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Florida Design Consultants, Inc. : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: PLT2005-00007. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. Provide a completed Preliminary Plat application. (see attached). 2. Provide Existing and proposed rights-of-way and easements to the preliminary plat page. 3. Provide proposed street names to the preliminary plat page. 4. Provide the dimensions and area of the following: the overall plat and each lot, streets, rights-of-ways (including radii of cul-de-sacs), common open space or other land to be dedicated for a public purtpose if any. Suggestion: place the lot areas in square feet under each of the individual lot numbers. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Friday, April 8, 2005 (2:00 p.m.). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4604 or John. Schodtler@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, ' q" (f? L,.--- Jo Schodtler Planner I Letter of Incompleteness - PLT2005-00007 - 2945 SUNSET POINT RD 0 :b' : ,: It Apr. 05 2005 09:41AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 98483648 Apr.05 09:39AM 02'48 SND 07 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). RORIDA DESIGN CONSUIMNIS, INC. Sunset Point Subdivision Master Drainage Report STANDARD GENERAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PERMIT ' City of Clearwater Pinellas County, Florida ' Prepared for: Deeb Family Homes, Ltd. ' 9020 Rancho Del Rio Drive New Port Richey, Fl 34655 March 15, 2005 ' Table of Contents: ' 1. Overview II. Existing Conditions III. Proposed Conditions IV. Pre-Development CN, Tc, and ICPR Basin Conditions V. Post-Development CN and Tc VI. Post-Development ICPR. Input and Runoff ' VII. Water Quality Treatment Volumes VIII. Filter Drain Drawdown Analysis IX. Storm Sewer Hydraulics X. Appendix ' Included Exhibits Location Map 1"=200'Aerial Photograph USGS Quadrangle Map SCS Soils Map FIRM/FEMA Map Pre-Development Drainage Basin Map Post-Development Drainage Basin Map I. Overview General Overview: The proposed Sunset Point project is located on a 3.21 acre site in the City of Clearwater, Pinellas County, Florida (Section 5, Township 29 south, Range 16 east). The site is located at the southeast corner of Sunset point Road (C.R. 578) and C.R. 193. (See the attached Aerial, USGS Map, and Location Map). There are no wetlands on site. The proposed project consists of fourteen single family residence. The project will also include the construction of the necessary parking, drainage, and utility systems to service the site. On March 24, 2005 an informal pre-application meeting was conducted with SWFWMD's Richard Alt, P.E. He did not see any objections to the design or treatment concepts for the proposed site. Soil Survey Information: According to the SCS Soil Survey of Pinellas County, Florida, the soil found onsite consists of Immokalee, Myakka, and Adamsville Fine Sands.(See attached Soil Map). Flood Zone Information: According to FEMA Flood Information Rate Map number 12103COI27G, the project is entirely within Flood Zone X, which is outside of the 100-year flooding condition. (See attached Flood Zone Map). Existing Conditions: The proposed parcels total 3.21 acres and consist of a vacant parcel and another smaller lot with a detached single-family residence. Onsite vegetation is a mixture of grasses and low brush with some trees scattered across the parcels (see survey). In the southeast corner of the site there is an existing sanitary sewer manhole, which services the existing single-family residence. There are a series of stormwater inlets in the Sunset Point Road right of way, that service that road. Elevations on the site range from 52' to nearly 57'. The site generally slopes southeast to northwest (see Survey). The majority of the site, about 2.53 acres (referred to as ONSITE), drains to the northwest and out to the Sunset Point Road right-of-way. The western most portion of the site, 0.68 acres (referred to as OFF 193), drains to the west and out to the C.R. 193 right of way. There are also 1.78 acres (referred to as offsite), which is south of the site and drains through the site, and to the Sunset Point right-of-way. Proposed Conditions: ' The proposed project consists of 14 detached single family homes. The project will also include the construction of the necessary utility, drainage, and road system to service the 14 proposed homes. The proposed retention pond is located in the northeast corner of the site. It is a wet system with effluent filtration (Filter Drain). The pond will treat the volume of the first half-inch for the site, as required by SWFWMD. ' The discharge structure (Outfall Control Structure) is a modified "Type D" inlet with a 5' weir. The offsite flow from the south will be routed through a series of structures on the site. It will be collected by a modified "Type D" inlet, which is set in a swale at the southern property boundary. ' The flow from the pond discharge structure and the offsite water routed through the site are both discharged into an existing inlet at Sunset Point Road. Operation and Maintenance: The owner of the property will be responsible for operating and maintaining the proposed stormwater system. A maintenance letter was mailed to the owner. II. Existing Conditions Existing Conditions: ' The proposed parcels total 3.21 acres and consist of a vacant parcel and another smaller lot with a detached single-family residence. The existing driveway, house, and wooden shed are to be removed. Onsite vegetation is a mixture of grasses and low brush with a few trees scattered across the parcels. In the southeast corner of the site there is an existing sanitary sewer manhole, which services the ' existing single-family residence. There are a series of stormwater inlets in the Sunset Point Road right of way, that service that road. Elevations on the site range from 52' to nearly 57'. The site generally slopes southeast to northwest (see attached Survey). The majority of the site, about 2.53 acres (referred to as ONSITE), drains to the northwest and out to the Sunset Point Road right-of-way. The 2.53 acre basin (ONSITE) has a 25-year 24-hour peak ' discharge of 11.07 cfs to the Sunset Point Road right-of-way. The western most portion of the site, 0.68 acres (referred to as OFF193), drains to the west and out to the C.R. 193 right of way. The 0.68 acre basin (OFF193) has a 25-year 24-hour peak discharge of 3.58 cfs to the C.R. 193 right-of- way. There are also 1.78 acres (referred to as offsite), which is south of the site and drains through the site, and to the Sunset Point right-of-way. The 1.78 acre basin (OFFSITE) has a 25-year 24- hour peak discharge of 6.57 cfs and drains to the proposed project. III. Proposed Conditions ' Proposed Conditions: The proposed project consists of 14 detached single family homes. The project will also include the construction of the necessary utility, drainage, and road system to service the 14 proposed homes. The proposed retention pond is located in the northeast corner of the site. It is a wet system with effluent filtration (Filter Drain). The discharge structure (Outfall Control Structure) is a modified "Type D" inlet with a 5' weir. The proposed 25-year 24-hour discharge from the pond is 11.14cfs, which is less than the pre-developed discharge of 14.65 cfs (OFF 1 93+ONSITE). The proposed top of bank for the pond is elevation 53.0'. The maximum stage for the pond (25-year 24-hour storm) ' is elevation 52.16', which provides 0.84' of freeboard. The offsite flow from the south will be routed through a series of structures on the site. It will be collected by a modified "Type D" inlet, which is set in a swale at the southern property boundary. The water from the OFFSITE basin is unaltered, it is just collected at the southern boundary of the property and discharged into the Sunset Point Road stormwater system just as it did in the pre- developed condition. The flow from the pond discharge structure and the offsite water routed through the site are both discharged into an existing inlet at Sunset Point Road. According to the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) rules, the proposed pond must treat the first one-half inch(.5") of runoff over the entire project site. Based on a total project area of 139,828 ft2 (3.21 acres), the required treatment volume is 5,826 ft3. The water ' quality treatment for this wet detention system is achieved by effluent filtration (Filter Drain). The available volume in the pond, between elevations 51.37' and 50.5'(S.H.W.T.), is 5873 ft3, and exceeds the required volume (5,826 ft) for water quality treatment (See calculations). 1 IV. Pre-Development CN, Tc, and ICPR Basin Conditions Runoff Curve Numbers Project: Sunset Point By. BKF Date: 2/11/2005 Location: Onsite Basin Checked: Date: Circle one: Pre-Development Post-Development FN: SunsetCNPre.XIs Ql #;...: Oll .....:::: ....;.. 5...... Nriae......... :::. ...ldr::::oar ... Ptod?tcf,.:. ::..SG!.....P ............ ............. ...............:...........................:.:........... ........ . . ?. {c irerlype,:treafinent, artd acres : Cleft: ire l ...?:...... .... : :::::::::::::: ; ::.:::::::::::::::: h .??rc?id ??:cor?dttr?n ::::€:€:: ::::.. ;:.:::: :::?'ab:€: .. ... s:::::€ ::::: . ::::::::` Sal .:.:.:.:. :.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: ..:.:?:..:.: :.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.....:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:. lire" Y)..: ... ., .. [ [ # .......................................................... ................. ........................ ............................. Woods-grass combination, Fair 17 IMMOKALEE B/D 25 condition 82 1.02 83.6 Woods-grass combination, Fair 11 ADAMSVILLE C 25 condition 76 0.19 14.4 F Woods-grass combination, Fair 5 MYAKKA B/D 25 condition 82 1.32 108.2 CN (weighted) = total product/total area 2.53 206.3 References: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Technical Release 55, Soil Conservation 82 Service, June 1986 Project: Sunset Point By. BKF Date: 2/17/2005 Location: Off193 Basin Checked: Date: Circle one: Pre-Development Post-Development Keterences: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Technical Release 55, Soil Conservation 82 Service, June 1986 Project: Sunset Point By. BKF Date: 2/17/2005 Location: Offsite Basin Checked: Date: Circle one: Pre-Development Post-Development ............ :€Srii.:€ .... :Sc?tlNam €fl.drol. .?c :.:. .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: ..:..........Gaver.::bescrr r roil €€`€€ =? ;;;;? o. ??........ . ff Mt, ;tired t3?!e..:. ....... . # . Woods-grass combination, Fair 17 IMMOKALEE B/D 25 condition 82 0.09 7.4 Woods-grass combination, Fair 11 ADAMSVILLE C 25 condition 76 0.18 13.7 Woods-grass combination, Fair 5 MYAKKA 8/D 25 condition 82 1.51 123.8 CN (weighted) = total product/total area 1.78 144.9 References: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Technical Release 55, Soil Conservation 81 Service, June 1986 Pre-Developed Time of Concentration Based on Figure 5-19 (page 90) of the Florida Department of Transpoertation Drainage Manual the Time of Concentrations were found to be as follows: Basin Onsite Offsite Offl 93 Time of Concentration 12.0 Minutes 17.0 Minutes 7.0 Minutes Basins ____________ ___________ __°_______________° Name: Off193 Node: NOFF193 Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 7.00 Area(ac): 0.680 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 82.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: Offsite ----------- ------------------------------ Node: Noffsite ----------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 17.00 Area(ac): 1.780 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 81.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 ------------------------ Name: Onsite ----------- ------------------------------ Node: Node ----------------------------------- Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 12.00 Area(ac): 2.530 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 82.00 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 Nodes Name: Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 0.000 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 0.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) Area(ac) --------------- --------------- Hydrology Simulations Name: Pre25 Filename: K:\198\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\Pre25.R32 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 2 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 15.00 =====Routing Simulations Name: Pre25 Hydrology Sim: Pre25 Filename: K:\198\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\Pre25.I32 Execute: No Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 30.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 15.000 Group Run --------------- ----- BASE Yes Boundary Conditions Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 2 Simulation Basin Group Time Max Flow Max Volume Volume hrs cfs in ft3 Pre25 Off193 BASE 12.02 3.579 6.810 16810.751 Pre25 Offsite BASE 12.13 6.570 6.688 93212.855 Pre25 Onsite BASE 12.05 11.070 6.812 62556.992 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 I V. Post-Developed CN and Tc r BF 2/17/2005 Post Developed CN-Weigh ted Average Pre-DEV Areas (Ac.) CN Weighted Onsite 2.53 82 207.46 Off193 0.68 82 55.76 Total 3.21 Weighted Average CN= 82.00 Pond and Entrance Road Acreage CN Weighted Pervious 0.075 82.00 6.15 Pavement 0.084 98 8.23 Pond 0.25 100 25.00 Total 0.41 Weighted Average CN= 96.29 TYPICAL LOT Acreage CN Weighted Pervious 0.11 82.00 9.02 Pavement 0.04 98 3.92 House 0.06 98 5.88 Weighted Avg.= 89.62 TOTAL SITE AREA (Ac.) CN Weighted TYPICAL LOTS 2.8 89.62 250.9333333 POND AND ENTRANCE 0.41 96.29 39.47828851 Site Area 3.21 Total 290.4116218 r Weighted Average CN= 90.47 Post-Developed Time of Concentration Conservatively based on the storm sewer calculations, the time of concentration for the post-developed condition is 15 minutes. Basins ---- ------ ______ __--_____---_------------ Name: Onsite Node: Pond Status: Onsite Group: BASE Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph Unit Hydrograph: Uh256 Peaking Factor: 256.0 Rainfall File: Flmod Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall Amount(in): 9.000 Time of Conc(min): 20.00 Area(ac): 3.210 Time Shift(hrs): 0.00 Curve Number: 90.47 Max Allowable Q(cfs): 999999.000 DCIA(%): 0.00 -------------- Nodes ------------- Name: BNDY Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 Init Stage(ft): 43.500 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft): 50.000 Type: Time/Stage Time(hrs) Stage(ft) --------------- --------------- 0.00 43.500 12.00 45.500 30.00 43.500 ------------------------ Name: Pond ------------------------------- Base Flow(cfs): 0.000 --------------------- Init Stage(ft -------------- ): 51.370 Group: BASE Warn Stage(ft ): 53.000 Type: Stage/Area Stage(ft) A --------------- -------- rea(ac) ------- 50.500 0.1400 51.500 0.1700 53.000 0.2200 Pipes Name: From Node: Length(ft): 0.00 Group: BASE To Node: Count: 1 Friction Equation: Average Conveyance UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Solution Algorithm: Automatic Geometry: Circular Circular Flow: Both Span(in): 0.00 0.00 Entrance Loss Coef: 0.00 Rise(in): 0.00 0.00 Exit Loss Coef: 0.00 Invert(ft): 0.000 0.000 Bend Loss Coef: 0.00 Manning's N: 0.000000 0.000000 Outlet Ctrl Spec: Use do or tw Top Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use do Bot Clip(in): 0.000 0.000 Stabilizer Option: None Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Pagel of 3 Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description: Circular Concrete: Square edge w/ headwall Weirs Name: Weirl From Node: Pond Group: BASE To Node: BNDY Flow: Both Count: 1 Type: Vertical: Mavis Geometry: Rectangular Span(in): 60.00 Rise(in): 9999.00 Invert(ft): 51.370 Control Elevation(ft): 51.370 TABLE Bottom Clip(in): 0.000 Top Clip(in): 0.000 Weir Discharge Coef: 3.200 Orifice Discharge Coef: 0.600 Hydrology Simulations Name: P0st100 Filename: K:\198\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\P0stl00.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 12.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 15.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Post25 Filename: K:\198\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\Post25.R32 Override Defaults: Yes Storm Duration(hrs): 24.00 Rainfall File: Flmod Rainfall Amount(in): 9.00 Time(hrs) Print Inc(min) --------------- --------------- 30.000 15.00 Routing Simulations Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 2 of 3 Name: Post100 Hydrology Sim: Post100 Filename: K:\198\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\Post100.I32 Execute: No Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max Delta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 30.0000 Boundary Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) -------------- Print Inc(min) - --------------- 30.000 15.000 Group ----------- Run --- BASE - ----- Yes -------------- Name: ------------------------------- Post25 Hydrology ------------------------------------------------------- Sim: Post25 Filename: K:\198\ProjData\DrnData\ICPR\Post25.I32 Execute: Yes Restart: No Patch: No Alternative: No Max De lta Z(ft): 1.00 Delta Z Factor: 0.00500 Time Step Optimizer: 10.000 Start Time(hrs): 0.000 End Time(hrs): 30.00 Min Calc Time(sec): 0.5000 Max Calc Time(sec): 30.0000 Bounda ry Stages: Boundary Flows: Time(hrs) ----- Print Inc(min) - --------- 30.000 - --- ----------- 15.000 Group -------------- Run - ----- BASE Yes Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 3 of 3 1 VI. Post-Developed ICPR Input and Runoff Max Time Max Warning Max Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max Name Group Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow hrs ft ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs BNDY BASE Post25 12.00 45.500 50.000 0.0014 0 12.29 11.143 0.00 0.000 Pond BASE Post25 12.29 52.156 53.000 0.0050 8357 12.25 11.643 12.29 11.143 Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 02002 Streamline Technologies, Inc. Page 1 of 1 VII. Water Quality Treatment Volumes Sunset Point Treatment Volume Required Treatment of 1/2" Per Acre: Required Treatment for 3.21 Acres = 5,826.15 ft3 Treament Depth .87' Area at elevation 50.5' (SHWT) 6098.40 ft2 Area at elevation 51.5' 7405 ft2 6098.4 ft2 +7405 ft2= 13503.4 ft2 13503.4 ft2 /2= 6751.5 ft2 Treatment Volume Provided: .87 ft * 6751.5 ft2= 5873.8 ft3 Top of Treatment Volume is elevation 51.37' VIII. Filter Drain Drawdown Analysis DETENTION POND SIDE-DRAIN FILTER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS E h ^h V ^V Lmin Lmax Lavg HYD. AREA FLOW AVG. ^T ET NGVD TOTAL INCR. TOTAL INCR. GRAD. FILTER Q=KIA FLOW INCR. TOTAL 51.37 2.37 XXXXXXXX 5,685 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.1850 39.3 252.4 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 603 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 243.7 2.5 XXXXXXXX 51.28 2.28 XXXXXXXX 5,083 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.1415 38.0 235.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 2.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 595 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 226.7 2.6 XXXXXXXX 51.20 2.20 XXXXXXXX 4,488 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0980 36.7 218.3 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 5.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 587 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 210.3 2.8 XXXXXXXX 51.11 2.11 XXXXXXXX 3,900 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0545 35.4 202.2 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 7.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 580 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 194.5 3.0 XXXXXXXX 51.02 2.02 XXXXXXXX 3,320 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0110 34.1 186.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 10.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 572 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 179.3 3.2 XXXXXXXX 50.94 1.94 XXXXXXXX 2,748 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.9675 32.8 171.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 14.1 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 565 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 164.7 3.4 XXXXXXXX 50.85 1.85 XXXXXXXX 2,183 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.9240 31.5 157.6 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 17.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 557 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 150.8 3.7 XXXXXXXX 50.76 1.76 XXXXXXXX 1,626 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.8805 30.2 144.0 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 21.2 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 550 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 137.4 4.0 XXXXXXXX 50.67 1.67 XXXXXXXX 1,077 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.8370 28.9 130.9 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 25.2 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 542 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 124.7 4.3 XXXXXXXX 50.59 1.59 XXXXXXXX 534 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.7935 27.6 118.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 29.5 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 0.09 XXXXXXXX 534 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 112.6 4.7 XXXXXXXX 50.50 1.50 XXXXXXXX 0 XXXXXXXX 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.7500 26.3 106.7 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX 34.3 51.37 DLW (TOP OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 50.5 NWL (BOTTOM OF TREATMENT VOLUME) 49 ELEVATION OF CENTERLINE OF PIPE 6970 AREA @ DLW (s.f.) 6100 AREA @ NWL(s.f.) 2 L min 2 L max 5.42 "K" (f./hr.) 15 REQUIRED UNDERDRAIN LENGTH 34.3 TIME FOR SYSTEM TO DRAW DOWN (36 HOURS = 72 HOURS WITH SAFETY FACTOR OF TWO) IX. Storm Sewer Hydraulics 3/25/2005 Description: SUNSET POINT Designed by: BKF County: CLEARWATER/PINELLAS Checked by: O.C. Page: 1 CONDITIONS Outfall Tailwater Elevation: 51.50 Storm Event Runoff Coefficients Exit Loss at Outfall: 0.00 Zone Fre Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Storm Sewer Control Elevatio 51.50 6 10 0.20 0.95 0.90 FROM TO Drainage Areas Tc Travel Inten. Total Flow cfs Inlet Elevations Pipe Elevations Fall Pie HGL Flow Velocity Capacity Mann'g Station Offset Inc. Sub- Sub- Time CA (Qb) Sum(Qb) Inlet HGL HGL Height % Type 'N' Type Brls Len Total Total CIA Crown Line Width FL CA min min in/hr ac TOTAL Clear. Jnc Loss Flow Lin ft in % (fps) cfs 01 02 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 52.65 51.69 - 51.69 51.64 0.050 24 0.161 Full 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.14 15.00 0.16 6.38 1.54 9.84 47.50 47.30 3.13 19.69 0.012 CURBINL 1 31.00 1.55 1.55 1.39 9.84 0.96 0.00 45.50 45.30 0.200 24 0.645 02 3 0.02 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.00 52.65 51.64 51.64 51.50 0.142 24 0.472 Full 0.00 0.15 0.30 0.28 15.16 0.00 6.35 2.65 16.84 47.30 47.10 5.36 20.01 0.012 CURBINL 1 30.00 1.07 2.62 2.36 16.84 1.01 0.00 45.30 45.10 0.200 24 0.667 Onsde- i)t4A A,;w, fa pvnJ STORM SEWER HYDRAULICS System: Sys 1 Consultants, Inc. Units: ENGLISH ASAD-LT, copyright 1992-1997, Hiteshew Engineering Systems, Inc. Portions of ASAD-LT were developed by International Engineering Consultants, Inc. T60v11.RPT 3/25/2005 PROJECT Number: 508-27 Description: SUNSET POINT County: CLEARWATER/PINE STORM SEWER HYDRAULICS System: Sys 2 Organization: Florida Design Consultants, Inc. Designed by: BKF Checked by: O.C. Page: 1 CONDITIONS Outfall Tailwater Elevation: 43.00 Storm Event Runoff Coefficients Exit Loss at Outfall: 0.00 Zone Fre Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Storm Sewer Control Elevatio 44.84 6 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 FROM TO Drainage Areas Tc Travel Inten. Total Flow cfs Inlet Elevations Pipe Elevations Fall Pipe HGL Flow Velocity Capacity Mann'g Station Offset Inc. Sub- Sub- Time CA (Qb) Sum(Qb) Inlet HGL HGL Height % Type 'N' Type Brls Len Total Total CIA Crown Line Width FL CA min min in/hr ac TOTAL Clear. Jnc Loss Flow Line ft in % fps cfs 04 05 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.57 6.57 54.00 52.62 52.62 52.30 0.320 18 0.333 Full 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.43 10.66 0.00 0.00 52.50 52.30 3.72 5.19 0.0120 DBI 1 96.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.57 1.38 0.00 51.00 50.80 0.200 18 0.208 05 06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.57 53.00 46.07 46.07 45.80 0.270 18 0.333 Full 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.43 0.36 10.39 0.00 0.00 46.30 45.80 3.72 8.94 0.0120 MANHOLE1 81.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.57 6.93 0.00 44.80 44.30 0.500 18 0.617 06 07A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.57 53.20 45.57 45.57 45.30 0.273 18 0.333 Full 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.79 0.37 10.18 0.00 0.00 45.80 45.30 3.72 8.89 0.012 MANHOLE1 82.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.57 7.63 0.00 44.30 43.80 0.500 18 0.610 07A 07 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.14 17.71 51.20 45.09 45.09 44.84 0.250 24 0.926 Partial 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.16 0.00 9.99 0.00 0.00 45.80 45.55 sub 8.26 23.58 0.012 MANI-110 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.71 6.11 0.00 43.80 43.55 0.250 24 0.926 r Units: ENGLISH ASAD-LT, copyright 1992-1997, Hiteshew Engineering Systems, Inc. Portions of ASAD-LT were developed by International Engineering Consultants, Inc. T60v11.RPT APPENDIX UNION ST Project Site UNSET POINT ROAD 0 x m 0 m O m 7 z w J J D U 10TH AVE S JO ?V ?O O x 0- 0 0 fJf u! F a 0 a a Y Z Z 0 U Y a N n N 0 N N SUNSET POINT PROPERTY GIS Data LOCATION MAP This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a varietyEof sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be0ansidered comprehensive for site-specific data. rS 1 " -1000' ¦¦ FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS 6 PLANNERS s i i 's GIS Data AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a varietKof sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to beDonsidered comprehensive for site-specific data. 1 " - 200' + FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS I ' l r•.r r rtI ¦ t - ?t . Id•_•.liLIL F,b'f.M 1 I 1 Cif, 1 ?. X- _ _ . •?.r••.tt .. .. - _ .?.. S? - Z • i 1 U .I • .? ,L.-r . .{ -- I I• . ?I i ?'..x X. I" , I ?, - ?? ?•I? ?w1 , • r / I 1 ? . 1 r 11? ?'' ? ? • It /? ?1•'tt111 I - - +- _-_ ??' - I' r. I _ Iy t;;• ; ;'.x. ?? I -- --?tit `.. •, , • (• •.•, ., C'. It r, , I • • l14 hl • ? I l• .. ai L r V 1 1 ?r Xx x I. I',?t ?Ir ?t(f II Ltd !: .•'?- :: I •I? I IjiT i-?• • 1'I? It, X3 I - = y.t..._=..? ' 11' (? ,? rl' -1w .. - •7r •r W 1 • I '• . ' . n- .I? j • '1 • r, '•. , • I , ?` J 0 '.? Project Site Vtti. ,I'' '?'? ?.?1 • ___ II ?.-3?1 ml I If 11? i? {rr? ,?"•l , i l? _ .. ? I J? ,i ?.. d ? _ '? t '?i?'','??? 'I r„ 1 r?'• _ ?? -?_ ?1 , I :'-' _?`{'y,I?'?1 ? r-' i :?f' ' -` If `l? • :tip' •?,, ? i ?r., ? 1? F ? -?.•-?! . ? ??•, ' ? -. I ? ? • •ti•ar.v : ,, • r• i . ii. ? _ I ?..•; w,.?.?..?/., ?? ? - ? ; i i I ',_.?? Y-? i -- _ =f?.I li _ ?" 1 :? ......,? , I;?':J.• T: ?? 'P4A r, -_??...M??. =r-? •il.l. __ -y- ..+?pir-'a..Yr' _ _ .--I t Lr I 11 I i ., 1 rm`•m l..M?- J „ !1'It• ??•.??'-' 1 i r1 r ( • I 1777-7ts's MOIL)' 1.,,_ ••11. i01 R14?d. ?• .r• ! ! I ??- r? ?• 1 I'. i Li•?,is -?II • • 1/ I i ?' - ?I ?, 11. ??I . - .- • '1?r I?_ ?" l..]' 1 - -- •..,y f,1? -? t I? ! ??I? r • , ?? -. ,. } I I Ir - Jr?' ?.rl i' --1 yq1 '.. I -I V?,;•'.=..•?y+'"{,-r"•?" •?t?'( =0" ?a'? 1•? • : • ! ,, f I -I I r ;• I ?I ,i 4' _ i I,1 ???_.:..?J 044 I? ! i?l •L!.Ia:v. rn • ?? , , - ?,: •? _ •? , r ?,,. m •? : mll e' I' • •r r?? . mass ,?`i •? • ,.I- I - - ?' . 6 , 1 I 1•. P - =?1 SAFETYHArOR G, ?? ?• M' •.?) I , 1..?tl? 1? ` ?r t 1.1 ? Il.-? ?i •i 1 .? _ c "? . I ?I •Ir C11 IC•.. In;? ?•a. Ic_,,,_? -? It (I}?plJ? t I r', i I •?• ~ ? l ? 'I ., N• `,i r' 1 •AIi i •. : IJ I •..ta r I I lt!"! I.w • `, l l.. + I , _'I ?i?JL ?f?-I I I I •? (IL`? , L ..y+ I •- h t _ I 11 f 1 r r• ?'• 'll s•?r 1 •r.?rJ l'?•''' ...t • t -' - I r-: Y _ ???? r?-ter _ _ .. I _ J ? ? • m - h"? ? r• - II.? ?- ? • 'w •I r • r„ a lu•. } J?. .• I ' T- ,? l? J •I? 7"• i I ? `f $?I 1 I'-`• 4. ??r„-r•" ? r!I(rce.i?.+??? } I CCC?? ? r% !•''? ?• ? • , i1 ? ? ; r ,+ Ile rr I ?• 'r ?1 1 r ..i. ? II I ?,? .wf •' ,? 7./ ' f?w? . ?'??• u' -k r / ?I. ? , r. rJ (. !' •.rrir.ul.lr ri.?,{' - '• y?' {`?y??, ??. t •? i • ,1Yi-? \1 1 _-l?•' / 1 '?' I I J ' . it 4'+..?i,• ?+r' = ?.cY: -1 ,?-./.. ( ,'*_?N... h • r . 04 .'.r•.?•• •rr • rTTt11;?,:..ITr,???l?l ( _ •?r r??--?_ I? I.- _ 6.we •I.ul•aIt 41. ',rte ?? ` Cts , . •I. r? • r ` ' I ?7Y/? • • 1 ,•-r. r I ;?. , .• I ??T'qr? I? , a ?'.}? ,' ??!? r?J?` 1 Ir?.arllTf? 'kf \I -rm i f,?•? at ?...t?' 1??? ? - rt7frl.• I. 1????` ?i I 1??1 , •:r. '- •.' • , i' l:•, r • : L . b _.. 41??: ha - iia_ f_ r I IVZa`? it I I I I _ 't --'s?- i+"?`• )•--- 1 , . • ?' I ti: ! J? I 1! r?1 1 ' + 'u 10 I . • . , • F, f • • it I ,f: l I I . 1 1 • r?/ y? ?': 00; r • rr i ; 1 r, r i • ?? r/ • ••i L I I I ?I 1. a s m "t 4 r V?>>• r • • I r r -' f I lit r ._ w I- I' , t __._?J+ • ?m r ,l ?• •I ?/ ?: f.-l,.+r' I I. .,I ;? I I? '? I l .\ , ?• • It J cf, I? • i,l ` YQ 1 '-?"• ?. ( s .?•• ?? ) I •'• ,• ?••. •• ,? • •. • ?? 1^,L• i ,?, )+ it ./?. f?' • II,- ?? I •,`I S , (t 4 .. U? ?d (lr :?/ r•r+•1\/? i 'f? ? - '. •' •, ' V-?! .at I ?i•• ,I"d, (i I' ??'`• ?'f • i. .' . : :j,al J' ?.`r S? Jr• .?,},'• If 1?? ?, A. .?i:. 777""'' a.i 1. ••,./r . 1 i ?:-....? -{ iM L' '' S `?+ ,` " I .- yr- •.H ? r• =?7„' ! . ' .Ll.? .'. •.- ?,?' - " ?? ?, r its j, Coach N:t 0 X U 7 N a a Y z z U U Y a g n 8 N SUNSET POINT PROPERTY GIS Data USGS MAP -SAFETY HARBOR QUADRANGLE This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be ansidered comprehensive for site-specific data. 1" =1000' FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS & PLANNERS v ?EPn1ATERTABLE (e Tf i IMMOKALEE FINE SAND F1? S-URBA COMPLEXIO TQ PERCENT SLOPES WATER r Project Site j . {Vt IL ?-.? : albs r 0!1* K r "'{ CAI MS? . ?? IMMOKALEE FINE SAND WAUCHULA FINE SANDIO TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES L __ • - IMMOKALEE FINE SAND [4 ADAMSVILLE FIN iND r a r :. .k ¦ 1. 9? ,r L ?IT NOW r 7 ya Iry yo. M1 PLACID FINE SAND T zi "61 '?_ 7F INE SANDIO TO 5 PERCENLSkOPES ,,. , *.- i? AF'FINE Sl ir PI n_ LACID FINE SAN r k .r SUNSET POINT PROPERTY - SOILS GIS Data This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be considered comprehensive for site-specific data. N ? 1" = 200' FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, SURVEYORS & PLANNERS ,qf 4' X Project Site ! uw y P l . ? 1 °`,? 77 r 500 ,.? • .` ->?`" - Wk M 1;17 yy .'+f ,. ;r t rr r s 0 'd X - _.!. 1 I k -' i VI 'K?? .t '+ ?4t ? i?a.' ;.? ? ,rC. ? . F r ` , Y?'`? y?w? , n ?? `'? ? S ?'T?? Z 1 • r ' ? i _ yy,. ,1 j g9 x'? I logo rr' f t x k S y k +! 1 f ?? 1 r? j ^Y t' 4 e;r X500. v' ? x. AE X ftL AE#4 i t w ? ? r? ? ? I j• r 40. X500 X 01 Nr_ SUNSET POINT PROPERTY - FEMA GIS Data Panel 12103C0127G, September 3 2003 ' This drawing is comprised of data obtained from a variety of sources. It is for information purposes only and is not to be ansidered comprehensive for site-specific data. 1 " = 200' r - Fr FLORIDA DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC. ENGINEERS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS. SURVEYORS d PLANNERS RONALD DIEKMANN 2947 SUNSET PT. RD. I CLEARWATER, FL 33759-1615 _ _;t 2? /•? _??, j, r - U -l / '? m n 111111111 i di