Loading...
FLD2005-07065 FLD2005-07065 566 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: HESS 07/01/2005 ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: R -T CLW CoverSheet 0 Clearwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205.00 0 CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Bay Esplanade Properties LLC: Stephen T Hess President MAILING ADDRESS: 64 Bay Esplanade. Clearwater FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-463-4377 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Bay Esplanade Properties LLC Go Stephen Hess President Stephen T Hess (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zavac, P.E.. RLA MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road. Ste 404. Safety Harbor. FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: keith(a)keithzayac.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 64 Bay Esplanade. 566 Bay Esplanade LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See Attachment A PARCEL SIZE: (acres, square feet) PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 21 condominium units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment B Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) 0 0 DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. See Attachment C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment C 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C ? Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Attachment D i i 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Attachment D 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Attachment D 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. See Attachment D E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Crit Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exem to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; _ A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist°, of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: - All existing and proposed structures; - Names of abutting streets; - Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; - Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; - Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; - Proposed and required parking spaces; - Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); - Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; - Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; - Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'/2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 2 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. X , Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and authorize City epresentatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn t and subsc ibed before me this 1 10 day of ?UnQ A.D. 20 Os to me and/or by 5? T ?t90b , who is personally known has produced r,5 as identification. Nota public, ,,,.iii"'•••,, I.YrD!A RODRIGUEZ My commission expires: Poo 1 ?r05 _ Notary Public - State of Florida • E sny Commission Expires Nov 7, 2005 Commission S DD 070740 "•x,°F 4 Bonded ray National Notary Assn. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 14 (Names of II property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Stephen Hess ?( 1' (11-- kRCi- i(.l'iiCG(C ?l`v: YlLir/ ?'?UflCi%?c'C r N 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) See attachment E for list of requests 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA -i as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Uwe), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and rrect. Property Orwner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner Bef re me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws of t• State of Florida, on this 5?4 20045 personally appeared 6-41W t„ T. 1-Ic `5 Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: 6v -lr ;) OOS ?.::"" LYDIA RODRIGUEZ Notary Public - State of Florida t • • _= My Commission Expi lm Nov 7, 2005 Commission 8 DD 070740 °Fh Bonded By National Notary Assn. 1 to d? who having been first duly sworn Notary Public S'Planning DepartmenhApplication Formsldevelopment revieWexible development comprehensive infill application 2005. doc RESPONSES TO DRC COMMENTS FOR 566 BAY ESPLANADE Fire: 1. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged 2. This building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge with intent of comply prior to CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 3. Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge with intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 4. Fire Department Connections shall be indentified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 5. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, tested and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. 6. Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply.Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Per discussion at DRC, a MEP consultant will provide calculations prior to construction plan approval. 7. Provide Class I standpipe system per NFPA-1,13.2.2.2. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Acknowledged and a note has been added to plan. Land Resources: The tree removals on the Demo Plan are inconsistent with all other plans, revise prior to Building Permit. The tree removal calculations have been removed. 2. Show to be preserved the four palm trees in the right of way prior to Building Permit. 2 . Remove the tree removal calculations from the plans prior to Building Permit. These calculations will be performed when the tree removal permit is applied for. The palm trees are located in the proposed sidewalk within the right of way and are in fact being removed. Stormwater: Required Volume of pond must follow City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Criteria where Vol = delta C x A x i x 3600. Additionally, the existing impervious area is limited to a 50% E credit in the predevelopment C calculations (use a value of .49 rather than .98). The calculations have been revised as requested. Please note that the calculations incorporated half of the existing impervious area, but has been revised to show the full existing impervious area at C=.49. 2. Outfall to a ROW requires a 50-year design storm. The stormwater pond has been revised to provide attenuation for a 50 year 1 hour storm. 3. Please review the predevelopment C calculation for area of Open Space. Viewing the existing survey, it appears that there is significantly less existing area than reported in the calculations. The calculations have reviewed and revised appropriately in conformance with the calculations shown on the site plan. 4. 6" freeboard is required on pond. A freeboard of approximately b" is provided. Additional freeboard can be provided by additional minimal berming if necessary with construction plans. 5. Include more proposed grades for sidewalk adjacent to pond. Additional grades have been provided on the sidewalk adjacent to the pond. 6. Provide cross section of pond, banks of ponds may only be 4:1 (H:V). Up to 2 sides (501/6) of pond may be vertical walls. The pond has been revised to be 4:1 per cross section on grading and drainage plan. Walls are shown on only two sides of pond. 7. Demonstrate Pond recovery within 24 hours. The drawdown calculations will be provided prior to construction plan approval like all other projects previously submitted and currently submitted. Solid Waste: Please provide recycling area for residents contact Tom Glenn 727-734-0920 for any information. A recycling area has been added inside the building and located on the architectural plans. Traffic Engineering: Ensure that the vertical height clearance for parking garage is 8' 2" to accommodate HIC van per ADAAG. The vertical height clearance for parking garage is minimum 8'2". 2. Driveway does not meet the 125' minimum spacing requirements between intersection and driveway. Per discussion and acceptance at DRC, the driveway was specifically located on a side road and not on Coronado to minimize safety impacts caused by driveway. Based on size of lot it is not possible to provide 125 ft spacing, but care was taken to locate driveway at area of minimum adverse impacts. Planning: There is a jog along the south property line (approx midway). Provide the building setback from this portion of the property line. A dimension has been added from the building to where the property jogs. 9 0 2. Is there a change in grade between the drive aisle within the garage and the non-vehicular use areas? It is anticipated that there will be a small internal change in grade from the garage to the non- vehicular areas that will be designed in the final building plans. 3. It would appear that the garage is to have gated access, provide the dimension to the gate from the edge of pavement within the right-of-way. Also, clearly identify the gate on the site plan and identify the means by which guests can obtain access to the parking garage. The gate has been clearly identified on the plans and dimensioned. Guests will be able to access the parking garage by a call pad to units. 4. Although noted as being a 20'x 20' sight visibility triangle, the sight visibility triangle at the intersection of Cypress and Clearwater St. is only 17'x 17'. Additionally, the sight visibility triangle at Clearwater Street and Bay Esplanade exceeds 20'x 20'. Please revise. The triangles have been revised to 20' x 20' 5. Site plan sheet A1.01 differs from site plan sheet 3 of 5. Clarify which plan is intended. Architectural plans have been revised to be in conformance with civil plans. 6. The drive aisle is 24' wide; however the gated access encroaches into the drive aisle reducing the width to 20'. Revise the gated access so as not to encroach upon the drive aisle. The gate has been revised to provide 24 ft clear drive. 7. What is the depth of the swimming pool? Provide a building section to clarify the impact of the pool on the dwelling unit below. The pool is 31-6" deep along with plumbing and other equipment which fits between the 10 ft high stories. 8. Sheet A2.01, A2.02 and A2.03 do not match sheet A2.10 with regard to the east lobby / elevator / trash room / stair locations. Plans have been revised to match. 9. The architectural elevations do not line up with the denoted building height dimensions (i.e. the dimensioned floors bisect the windows and doors). The plans have been revised to match up. 10. The architectural elevations are dimensioned with a height of 52'-8" to roof slab; however the building has a pitched roof. Revise the elevations to correctly dimension the height. Also, the site data table denotes a height of 52'. Please clarify. The height of the building has been reduced to 511-8" to top of slab. As discussed in the DRC meeting the barrel tile parapet is designed to look like a pitched roof to hide the mechanical equipment located on top of the roof. 11. Provide details as to the architectural features of the building. A higher quality elevation drawing will need to be provided prior to the application being heard by the CDB. Elevations have been enhanced with a higher quality elevation drawing. 12. How is recycling being handled? A space will be provided in the trash handling room for recycling. 13. Provide a roof plan? 0 0 A roof plan plan has been added to sheet A 2.03. 14. Depict the locations of all proposed mechanical equipment and depict how the mechanical equipment will be screened. The mechanical equipment will be located on the roof and screened by the barrel the parapet. 15. According to the City's Occupational License records, the subject properties consist of a total of 18 overnight accommodation units. With an allowable density of 40 du/ac for overnight accommodation units, the 0.55 acre property could be permitted 22 overnight accommodation units; thus the property is not non-conforming. As such, the permitted density of 30 du/ac for attached dwellings would be 16 dwelling units and the development proposal should be modified accordingly. As discussed at DRC, the density is derived from 18 motel units located on one of two assembled parcels added to the 30 units per acre over the second 0.55 acre parcel. This yields 21 condo units. 16 The submitted Description of Requests (Attachment "B") denotes a.termination of non-conformity for 8 overnight accommodation units and conversion to 6 multiple family condominium units. As noted previously, the subject property is not nonconforming with regard to overnight accommodation units; therefore this request is invalid and a revised Description of Requests need be submitted. Additionally, the request pertaining to height is potentially incorrect and may need to be revised once the architectural elevations are modified to dimension height measured to the mid-point of the pitched roof. The typographical error has been corrected to read "18 units". The height is measured to the top of roof slab since barrel tile is a parapet designed to look like a pitched roof to hide the mechanical equipment. 17 With regard to General Applicability criterion #1, the denoted density is unobtainable and the response will need to be modified based upon the maximum density of 16 attached dwelling units. Further, criterion #I requires that the proposed development be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties. The response provided does not sufficiently address the criteria with regard to the above elements and the adjacent properties as the referenced projects (Nepenthe, La Risa I and La Risa II) do not yet exist. The density calculations have been revised as previously discussed, and criterion #1 response enhanced to address criteria. 18_ Provide a revised response to General Applicability Criterion #6, which addresses how the design of the development proposal minimizes adverse visual impacts. The response has been revised. 19 With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion # 1, clarify how the development proposal is impractical without the requested deviation to height. Criterion #1 has been clarified. 20. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #7, provide a rationale as to how the proposed increase to height will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Criterion 07 has been enhanced and clarified. 21. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #8, clarify how the community character is benefited by a building that will exceed 50 feet in height. The response to character has been revised. i ATTACHMENT A PARCEL NUMUIERS i 05/29/15/54756/079/0 ? 80 05/29/15/54756/079/0020 • • ATTACHMENT B ]DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Increase in height from 35 ft to 51'-8" ft from FEMA to slab of roof. • Termination of non-conforming 18 overnight accommodations and conversion to 13 multi-family condominium units. • ATTACHMENT C GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent mid-rise properties. The existing surrounding properties are generally low and mid-rise older apartment buildings. Due to, FEMA constrains regarding redevelopment of existing structures the new development will include an at grade parking garage with units above. The proposed project density is a new 21 unit multifamily project that will remain consistent with the existing density of 18 motel units plus the density allowable by the second consolidated parcel. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 21 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the three previously approved Napenthe, LaRisa I and LaRisa II projects. In addition the project stays within 10% of the 50-foot definition of mid-rise building heights. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 21 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the existing motel developments. There are no proposed uses other than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The parking is designed within a fully within a parking garage and use only one 24-foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the project. The proposed 33 parking spaces exceed the required parking spaces required by code. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by implementing a Mission Spanish flavor suggested by City code. 6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes visual and acoustic impacts through the following: a. The project includes an upgraded landscape package replacing a project with virtually non-existent landscaping to accent the architecture and buffer the site from adjacent properties for privacy and noise reduction. b. The project takes all outside existing parking and puts the 33 parking spaces in a fully enclosed parking garage to eliminate the visual and acoustic impacts of parked cars. c. The mechanical equipment is removed from grade, placed on top of the building and fully enclosed with a parapet. This screen will virtually eliminate all visual and acoustic impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. d. The pool area is removed from grade and placed on the fifth floor to eliminate acoustic impact to the surrounding area. • 0 ATTACHMENT C GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent mid-rise properties. The existing surrounding properties are generally low and mid-rise older apartment buildings. Due to FEMA constrains' regarding redevelopment of existing structures the new development will include an at grade parking garage with units above. The proposed project density is a new 21 unit multifamily project that will remain consistent with the existing density of 18 motel units plus the density allowable by the second consolidated parcel. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 21 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the three previously approved Napenthe, LaRisa I and LaRisa II projects. In addition the project stays within 10% of the 50-foot definition of mid-rise building heights. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 21 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the existing motel developments. There are no proposed uses other than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion • 0 The parking is designed within a fully within a parking garage and use only one 24-foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the project. The proposed 33 parking spaces exceed the required parking spaces required by code. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by implementing a Mission Spanish flavor suggested by City code. 6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes visual and acoustic impacts through the following: a. The project includes an upgraded landscape package replacing a project with virtually non-existent landscaping to accent the architecture and buffer the site from adjacent properties for privacy and noise reduction. b. The project takes all outside existing parking and puts the 33 parking spaces in a fully enclosed parking garage to eliminate the visual and acoustic impacts of parked cars. c. The mechanical equipment is removed from grade, placed on top of the building and fully enclosed with a parapet. This screen will virtually eliminate all visual and acoustic impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. d. The pool area is removed from grade and placed on the fifth floor to eliminate acoustic impact to the surrounding area. ATTACHMENT D RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and development standards. The applicant is requesting an increase in height from 35'-0" to 51'-8". The property is an existing older motel property. The footprint and height of the building is designed to include 21 condominium units, which is consistent with the existing density of 18 motel units and an addition 3 units derived from the assembled second parcel, and 33 parking spaces. The units are sized in conformance with current marketable standards. These conditions were then designed into a building to be well within 10% of the 50 foot height generally recognized as mid-rise. A building with less height or depth could not practically hold the allowed units and still provide the City required parking. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of each unit are well in excess of $600,000, which will increase the property values of the neighborhood. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi- family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use designation i i 5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. The owner is committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using Mediterranean themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City. The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping includes a combination of palms, hedges and shrubs, which fully encompass the property. The building height while accommodating the allowable density, is minimized to within 10% of the 50 foot mid-rise definition. The height is less than other approved projects within the area, and attempts to minimize shade impacts to the surrounding areas. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to a height increase is requested for this project. The property is currently owned by the applicant and is working with their existing property constraints to create a project that fits the property and is consistent with other recently approved projects within the area. The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into an enclosed parking garage under the living units. This will enhance the capacity of the existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the"area by exterior parking. The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that surrounds the building and mitigates for the height flexibility. The building height is offset by the stepped facade of the building along with the enhanced Spanish Mission theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated without the City preferred theme. The community character is maintained as contemplated by Beach by Design as a mid-rise building within 10% of the 50 foot mid-rise definition. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required parking per standard code would be provided on-site. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) The "Old Florida" district is an area of transition between resorts and low intensity. The mix of uses favor residential rather than retail. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing buildings and should be low to mid-rise. Lack of parking hinders revitalization of existing improvements particularly on Bay Esplanade. The proposed building consists of a low-density four unit multi-family project and does not include any retail uses. The density of the project is less than required by the Tourist district and with only 21 units is below several of the existing apartment developments in the surrounding area. The building being 52 ft above FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as a mid-rise building consistent s with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of development. The project includes all required parking on-site and within the building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Bay Esplanade. The architecture of the building is generally Spanish Mission in nature, which is consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees, which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved projects along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors. HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL (U - I? •..N A _r" .NwA < LEGEND ` ,:,m a r1'' 4 K (rw.) rw1cAL ? GRAPHIC SCALE -••-••-••- PRaECr eoux5u+r N: ,? 4 7 ill JI., F EXISTING TREE To BE RENOWFO 7' pl I- L "f 1 I W K _ A 4.'.- i un>„mirroa .1! i,.: .:, PRmasm coxmcre PARItINC I l? e,m1 meYYN. b t< gvnWent. HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL GENERAL NOTES: n I, ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCItiECT: KEITH h ASSOCIATES, INC. ZAYAC nm r p )Ot ENTERPRISE ROAD ROAD EAST, SUITE 401 NTERPRISE E SAFETY HARBOR R S4695 Do 5 P 797-9888 ft. ? 793-9655 F9X Go Iy a g 2A. SITE ADDRESS: 64 BAY ESPLANADE cIEARWAMR, R ] y, F PARCEL ID: 05/29/15/94756/079/0020 N m 28. SIZE ADDRESS: 566 BAY ESPLANADE C CLEARWATER, R p m PARCEL ID: 05/29/15/54756/079/0180 V ZONING: Y 3. PRESENT USE B OVER NIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS 4. DEVELOPED USE 21 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS 5. TOTAL SITE AREA 24.250.6151' (0.55 AC) 6 6. SETBACKS: EQ 2$Q?-D q 0-15' , 10-15' FRONT 16.IY MIN. ((SOUTH TO BIDG.) ' 15.00 MIN. (SWAN TO OVERHANG) ?j p 19.00' MIN. (EAST TO BLDG.) 15.00' MIN. (WEST TO BLD6.) [y ?c •I ,'Z, 0-t0' SIDE 19.00' MIN. (NORTH TO BLDG.) 4 O a D 10.74' MIN. (NORTH TO SIDEWALK) . s 7. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 35'-100' Fi 6 F PROPOSED BOG. HEIGHT 51'-9" FROM FERIA LINE TO MID-PONT OF ROOF Q a W 8. SOLID WASTE D'JMPSTER WILL BE LOCATED IN BUILDING 9. UGHTNG WTHIN PROJECT BOUNDARIES WILL BE ATTACHED TO MM Y U BUILDING AND WILL BE SUBMITTED AS PMT OF DNAL BUILDING PLANS. y YS 3 M 10. EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS - 6,831.26 SF - 0.15 AC. It. ALL DISTURBED GRA55 WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. 12. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WIN CURB SIDEWALK, AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS 13 . FOOD ZONE: THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZC E "AE" AS DEPICTED GIN FERIA ROOD) INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 12101C01020 (EIEV 11) DATED: SEPTEMBER J, 2003 N- 14. A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPUGATON. 15. THERE ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE SURVEY ON THIS PROPERTY. 16. THERE ARE NO ENWROMENTALLY UNIQUE AREAS ON SITE. 17. A 1200 RECREATION FACILITY IMPACT RE IS WE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR FINAL PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) WHICH EVER OCCURS FIRST. CONTACT ART KACIt AT 727.562.4824. g III DUMPSTER SERVICE SHALL BE ARRANGED WIN SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL UCENSE OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. q PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT 727.562.4930 D 19. SIrt DATA LABL E9Siltl6: ?OSE@ BE?E?: A. IT& STE AREA: 24,256.61 4 (0.35 AC) 24,256.61 9 (0.55 AC) IaW0.00 SF B. TOTAL OPEN SPACE: 6.]]x52 F (0.15 11) 9123.11 SP (0.19 AC) t.21293 3 (0.02 AC MN.) C. BUILDING 1001 111 6,972.66 S (0.26 IV) 14,657.15 Sr (0.601SR) E. 40EWNK/DEC(/PAVED AREA: 10,511.41 ST 1.270.33 SF - M f. TOY& IMPERMCIS AREA: 1],461.09 7 (0.72 ISR) 15,0546 4 (D6517) 21445.67 S (BO IV MAX) .? G PARKING SPACES: 10 SPACES 33 SPACES 215 0.5 mACESANn 63 N. VEHICULAR AREA: N/A N/A - I. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA: N/A N/A N/A J OVERMCTI ACCAMMDDATdHS, 18 UNITS own N/A K MR7MNY QN00MX% mm 0 On ((18 W6rsa?W 11 UNITS (10 19415/ACF) T (a55ACX10 UNITS/AG)= n UNITS 3 OF 5 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY of i PLANT SPACING OETAIL (SECnO) ®? °0"p1O"00t "n9 ._-`? enm ume?e GRAPEQC SCALE ]1mA w1n ?:rNERq_ LAf<C Sc?AP= N" -ES ' poor pra.tn. a Oam Mow^? a Rweery eG?pM X Nrwe W lM M ?aE ?. . .t ., B.aa_ aM ?m?aw. rm M?Y pw :.n ae.? .r°?« tX .?? .B_! roan a:? maeN.twe. ?..,rmeBe... w.?.aMe _ na / 5. e f. pare ?eet neu ??uww.?ma?a ? ewe ae??w a Yee re?i e?i ? n4 wwX m eu<n a rea ?°r'ete ainia?„wa a rre eorw-n wwc Y n enell ebo r an e. aeab. w awtuN epee ara rew.e a ]' byp a cypeee mw enu n a M wt_na-m ?mtaXOtvr Y. >?? t ? taa? e? ue qu•t I?nr.tw po..nm w«na.e n. araraa emeaao. M ene ...rX or a x•vepe rr e' e?n,a .a of tM a.ae.w... wae. w«mat et .a m«t rw .p.=r.<ea. ara M nm_.a !. .wrl av anY can w aXwu. onpnww a r.eaw a rte, ?e?e?:ie?.p ? m °r, +v? r wnm.».,m ar e. ma:na?r ?.?wa?.a.wlea. w awn w rs>t .? wea,v,. ar re. , X. taM.wa <pM«,e. at B. ?. a ,aa., te. M . ro..?ap en n«?, aaweb p..w. eea .e?_ a a?? m.?..e?..,pnXn. rt. a s.arw arw a wen tm. to tmwaap. rwr.at ma mh??ea h' nM.n°i4tlns a Imwe cne?.?? . wi9]- tYeN cxw9 tlw pm M ue/v vtrleelbrn MII M iv«tw m tlw bavwe rwnlt«t tY. 21) te. ena Cwbaclar eMF 8ue?antawehN rp ebro eur..wptity tar a pXla w t.eln (13) mpntM rwm Xwl aeapta«e q tM e.ar. r!. away q pn Fonaeca« cwwcta p ro laaasaa metna maanotm. O'zyancwe coot nppt?ie immWbtay ro tM mixr. te. M pcm q w ary vrvlea u wt p wn wrrw a,t q tneaen wctw x w aw+el win. tY. w p.mra ro M v pea eYXtM Imaxy eaawc]> uam aner.ae ? aY mba a tM eaanwtiw te. Xo eme:ter a«taaatlw .m awn M wrmm.e a pe pera, e«M rot tM popes :,remanor? apn. ubNM aw tMt on aauMa 4++q pe anaxaw ?neteneXw est M reeoa]ea eM Sl. IupuaMn flsitmm M reeponnere I« • aa«lm, nwwal. ara ewer elq«a er a Y me e q relee Mns tln mtaeem a we palest t al pew LLsluresa _Mn rent a eeY awN a sopae. IRRIGATION NOTES r. .aam. ? ram a paaaee r a..a. w al papaw aaerga w Mpr+a aM InerW q tM caMwclw. I? pt? eyaan m tN w9 acMM q Loaeco K /rcnit«t ?i.rgohm must - zwc Inipaian a-lWII awan9e.awpn ¢ wtaYnpM tlwM iwnwY pN nna??cptione e/a arMhwhwe, must M eapnbna prwr ro re.p 'iapecllw aw «awa«.. ! wM.wpe Ceancror mu tM aoa.nan aw w?a euwe r« w IrrpoMn «newl woes atn me ewwe?earo«ta. e. tM rob rq h.gown eYeNm canpmn.b wl a uw?aa. pp .ocn maar«turen rcwwe. -cempammq Fm,tte. ua YX mIC ?ab?Mhi 6 SlpUmcOUWm WrWdMimr - 31 W a ? PLANT Ll im.ItOnthaTtH'-t3' TM. Ltlaaeum aepatun, e?aMm Ka Pma 1 ? cAL. (tv Xrl RepnwlpY Inate.IMb XenTem, 3 Mi', ] 5' OC. nm.pwum TOeln'v.rlp, verpeba vawpoan, ] we lz rrttvoc. m sB saran Been, eeM Cam Gna,]Ml. r< rk E) \JL,{ Qe C1 =Z .Y , FZcY G ? 5?C a ? m 6 k m Oro U G 0 Z z 0 ? w ? F U z a G zz 5 of 5 ISSUE DATE. 09.11! PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. LAGUNA ? ON BAY ESPLANADE RESIDENCES CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA • 9 ? J???? to ` %w?'?" S ???j•?(+ j` K ? .may J w4 r Ns a1 a I ? ? I I ?I I sties --too HMO 6 ?. is ? b ? s a ? n w e as ? r+ rr _ 4 A s ' e b K Q lootoo, Nam 11M 9rwr?aai r = 6 LE 31 as 1111110 9srar??rar?r. ¦ww warr?w?ww ww way Alm rw wwnw?r r?a 111 r 04, r4RjrAr, 'R STRdTT (AA r ADW) a WMMM earrr? 1'r =10'-0" ra 19 Gillctt Associaxs ARD«GROUn AchimcmQ.PLmiog . 1 Sme moot ? pkd?& 34236 911-95715{77 911.95715151 Pa Zw ?z g o N • ww+w MI rove r . rs ? rar !ro rr? t rra rr? A1.01 0 N 4 4 5UI!_D ING AREA TA ULATIONS SPACES UNITS ENCLOSED BLDG TERRACE AREA (SF) GROSS PARKINGs LEVEL 1 33 0 14648 TYPICAL LEVEL 2 6 12659 1989 TYPICAL LEVEL 3 6 12659 I989 TYPICAL LEVEL 4 6 12659 1989 TYPICAL LEVEL 5 3 9128 5520 TOTAL BUILDING FMESIDENTIAL UNITS : 21 UNITS TOTAL ENCLOSED BUILDINGS AREA: 61,753 TOTAL TERRACE AREA: 11,481 CONDO PARKING: 33 SPACES (INCLUDING: 2 NC) 0 8lJwws PLAN 1 "M 10?_0" GHku ItAsaociaaes AiD ae UlD U. Ae3imc =- titl.tM s.m.dSme s.'M ssU+s %1-957-4151 Pa '10 i? ?a ¦ ?MVIL PHNE o .. A2.01 w .. Will "? T k a T.M:Y.c Sal Ns mm 1" = 10'-0" Gillett na oc?ms ARD ??ORO U: AaLie®ec. Ao? 1543-1 019W soo., eda 31216 saas»sn vaas».asi ? ?D ¦ U. rp A2.02 A Gillecs Associates A !.oGROUP aa i.o AaMmcmt.. PLnomg Ssm.lri.inadm 1511.101 SmodSm S-..q Plauda 31296 411-57-477 911-957-151 P.. • U o E3 r 0 ELE1IaTIM 92"t r X.? MU MW& 1" = 10'-0" • wnw aeas ?errr r ..rem A2.03 A BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: WALL FIN&E& wm mm -owe 84-Ce'w01Mi1N1(A RMULPAIfm) M-QAr Sam H F"wwM it .OIMaW M1101YOm) if • ?Cl.Ie l? M Q7lwMi Ml t?T??:JHO[s 2RR7 4 ACME& mien mm-O NC M4 • nYwer i-1-Q1lIIIIW MwN Ntw =dYfMEDI YiITYllp1 N-f -ftllppYrtN11?AMImlObl4tl 0MlT T-2.CINRII0?iNNfAatOCUMO-l FDl1l/YR fT:WIp) W?VALOIPMANW) TS.Cmeaw,eu"=w"WCwumr /1NetfM m N4.CMpR17i1NITMpm,Qltou 6MET T-/. CTlw"m Few O ==I"fJ'A? mm /4AT DYER tU C-r mvm (ft10m) M. 0WqWM 4AT TU VM K4 - CO=QM MlMIMMUS (atMM WAROMLS/ AL& meTw15 aa.MtuwWOMAoWMEMwLODUM wT. OMaTN[ NCMwIfIYO®) teaiwsm il•wL'o®ruwTfuetoraefweT Ma.aaarawMU+woawuwco®r 6.2 ANM=Y) W'T1X.MAW MY0MLMwM K4 0WO%U"C VAbAWatr AUNITaT:0e fAL'L®I R - - -'tea b - u.6i•r?+ ELEVATIONS M&Pme OC" 5G1LJ' N 177. 111 = 10'-011 n Gillett Associates ARDT O`ROUaiP tA1C}II0 cmm PA4*amtg 1541101 Seomd STm4 S--uL Florida 14296 941-Bn-"n 941-"7-4151 F. H ? y V C4 Q ¦ AC a 0G N • ,-. iTTI•"-T-F ?"JT rte- DATE: AOGUST D, 2m5 Do CopYrtOt 2005 SCALE: 1'. 10'-0' SO0T6 ELBTATIOH SHEET NUMBER: A3.01 t BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: WALL FN&E$. Dofrfffm•fnr M. QfIfllgiPf?lOM10'Y f111L 1P1111fD1 ra • Q>MONINI TYlOp) ?f •f07; UN?N?111111 TRr 1 ACCENT& Mff will N. CrrfltNNfMplflf OfOGMI1W w llrl mwa T4 .ONMW IWIIOMftM00AMlftw I?al! O•WfM1 r f . DrnrtfA woaa? rownw?Troi rte. o?NOB wffw 01M O?IIMM wnrlAfofr nvm 1f om GUARDRAYg / k4 DRAL& tmi tm 44 . AfOfffp Al1Hf1 ffAA1ML AM W . Altttt® AIMW A @r. YrsW WM AfM 927-- M .. cur /R i41tl7 onm Tft Mb 14W. PAM@ Ni . ?rIW AfM II W Ii/ 011t OE OrK1 wf . o>mNns wfwmrnaowa?arMr raafWfanurw rA. LMIIIM aAr f11 f!M NI. G?AIW ANfNN nELMLOWa M. P154M immi AfOfMMw&CM M M•1.OMM" A(fNI(AWMMf WX '•V Apt A~IIOa[UCLOM! No. DlCMW" fJMA*AfM6 r AAf1f1PM" (AV4DMW _uaf? a 1 1 -fir Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP s...Pf.•fer•1?. SmogIM 344236 941-967-4477 941.9674161 Pa Zs s Q v a4 O ¦ C W m ti fM f.mmw r AfMf?Rr er ?ffAra mwf r rr wr•rM af?rrrrfa fAffn ff W s 1m?Aa ? RA rn?r r fry su r. r• Pf A rrrfpr .?P • fM0•Afff Mr PMY pOIMf l1R GATE: AUQ f A MDS ® Copyright 2006 SCALE: 1' . 10'-0' ELEVATIONS Olfff4fC fCfLE. r• r r r r r 6GY.[ N N4T. 1 11 = 10 1-011 NORTH XWFAT10N SHEET NUMBER: A3.02 .a BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: WA i EN&Fa. Doarte•?r jam M. MM= *FM OMMUSU MANN) M. 6Ar(640114 am 6(m u . f110(fuR,4RN a-a m, •). soMI um M Mod" Or 14141 1M 4 fig: 6w um-fARM1 1 .IAtm T?.(ap0nf0RIN1 OM 01120MON 11N 1F MOXW) 04.O}lpIFMMIN 1 fp"Wo"Itm aaw Ta • COW"M RlR1 PARomIWM V4. R' "MID) WMA.CA?AAWp) fa. Lmm " lmcc1mlIC1?QRgR14el(f-Alrtp, Ha.C1?e1fw RNRI VAt®,O.atotiaMer m mm" 11. ONI0RIC1111l E.w tIMAROJD WM&SNMTit Gp IRCOM(?AKW) Hd-PMXFA MOAT T1i NM l Atir10 11 Cr O ":DMM4MA lPIlLA(MWM) ? f ? Cy., /J Q / l{? - on sm v rw ME-CAR Wt 1RAR AN7116111L COL M I41.( )OOR 11 ..K0®AtYW1aWEML RRF " MUMC IN -OIDOMMC.MiM4lfMM (.100®) 64. AN.E® AL"QM A Rip. RAM(•WORAL VVW ff•4• DCLIWM CAMA$ AR rA~RYE"C'M, f i n i _ M4. 1 _fCm2? ? _ en Ree_r ELEVATIONS GRAPIIG 6GYF r• r r • v s ac.0a 14 POT, III = 101-011 Fnil- GMm Associates ARDT GROUP fe .?? A1543-101 sand S® SMA^ Fio.i& 342M 941-9574477 941.957-4151 Pu • I MfI0 ' --At z W RS a O W Ln B ¦ DATE: AUGUST Q 200.5 © COOr(ID1f 2006 SCALE: 1' . W-0' BAST BLSVA17ON SHEET NUMBER: A3.03 BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: WALL FML%E& wmum•11rYp 61.CYe00MMN1 wee Ql OUMOM) W- CAT OARM Tell ROW OTM ?.criwina.Pow trAmm) TMM 4 ACCFM& 1rvYNe•ee m PMRAIT T4 CVSdR)OY NeeR 0MPN VMWA?W(MM ) Mi. COMOtV Iety1('ANI Odw Ql DOW N c4e0Rgl mm wee 00="TM CYIRATm OMN®) WMMC PWW ) Td. co=wM WAC=w YCswffmftw(pwm) M.LalIOIIW IMM(MW?)oteewol/lr T-4 - C"aMMA PbW OM WOMITA M IMAPO D rQAr SOM TUUP LIVMRMM®) IH.OR AAIM CLAY Tu VM M. Dam""on Tl1!(ACV=) rJ i,?,+oAm t a (LA??e(Iys mean M• FMCM Al NOM AND4100uL CQYN M•1.=WMANIMM(II W)YORE0AE g•I . AICO® A)IMl161MC'AAL N71M M . MIMOME HYMN lames (ACO®1 0•T • ACO®AIYIeM (1Yl.OtANLA[71LL 6TLIp1 M. O@=U M CAWM AMM1Y A~ MYl UCO®/ -QmAm?- e R s l _4Jf2? _ M liv. _Pt?, lM1.TI_ ELEVATIONS I• r r v >. F SC.11.1 POW, 111= 101-011 A P 7 nni Gillett Associates ARDT OROUP AmLigcecm • F7aDDiDg dmws•Ni?i•Iaodoa 1543.101 S-d Suaet 5-.^ F WddR 34236 941-957.4477 941-9S7-4151 Pu dd@gOetANl - Z ?z tPQicl ? PG y ?y Vl O B 0 DATE: ALGLOT A 2006 oQ Copyright 2005 SCALE: V . 10'-0• 1Tm RLWATION SHEET NUMBER: A3.04 I ! .. .2 Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Hess Condominiums Stormwater Narrative 0 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com The stormwater system is designed to treat the first half-inch of runoff from the site, and attenuate the 50 year 1 hour storm event. The system consists of one normally dry pond. The site runoff is directed to the ponds by underground roof drain connections. The peak discharge is attenuated by a control structure prior to discharge to the public right of way. ,.,;. 61 , za- ,'? 1-11 t. f • Hess Condominiums Stormwater Calculations EXISTING CONDITIONS: Description Area ftz x C = YCA pavement 5,256 0.49 2,575.4 building 3,486 0.49 1,708.1 pond 0 1.00 - open area 15,517 0.20 3,103.4 Ce%1s = 0.30 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Description Area ftz x C= pavement 1,278 0.98 1,252.4 building 14,657 0.98 14,363.9 pond 785 1.00 785.0 open area 7,539 0.20 1,507.8 Cprop = 0.74 ATTENUATION VOLUME REQUIRED: Volume Required = delta C x A x I x 3600 delta C = 0.43 Area = 0.55 acres I = 4.2 in/hr 25 year 1 hour storm Volume Required = 3606.989 cubic feet Sta-ae-Storaae-Perimeter Project Name: Hess Condominiums Project Number: Designer: kez Date: _ N1240" W Comments: (ft) (ft) (ft) Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): 3,250.0 Elevation: 5.50 Volume: 5,044 Area @ Design High Water(DHW): 2,806.3 Elevation: 5.05 Volume: 3,681 Area @ Design Low Water(DLW): 1,623.1 Elevation: 3.85 Volume: 1,023 Area @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): 785.0 Elevation: 3.00 Volume: 0 STAGE AREA VOLUME STAGE AREA VOLUME TREATMENT (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) VOLUME: 1,023 ft3 3.00 785.0 0.0 4.25 2,017.5 1,751.6 3.05 834.3 40.5 4.30 2,066.8 1,853.7 ATTENUATION 3.10 883.6 83.4 4.35 2,116.1 1,958.2 VOLUME: 2,658 ft3 3.15 932.9 128.8 4.40 2,165.4 2,065.3 3.20 982.2 176.7 4.45 2,214.7 2,174.8 3.25 1,031.5 227.1 4.50 2,264.0 2,286.7 3.30 1,080.8 279.9 4.55 2,313.3 2,401.2 3.35 1,130.1 335.1 4.60 2,362.6 2,518.1 3.40 1,179.4 392.9 4.65 2,411.9 2,637.4 3.45 1,228.7 453.1 4.70 2,461.2 2,759.3 3.50 1,278.0 515.7 4.75 2,510.5 2,883.6 3.55 1,327.3 580.9 4.80 2,559.8 3,010.3 3.60 1,376.6 648.5 4.85 2,609.1 3,139.5 3.65 1,425.9 718.5 4.90 2,658.4 3,271.2 3.70 1,475.2 791.1 4.95 2,707.7 3,405.4 3.75 1,524.5 866.1 5.00 2,757.0 3,542.0 3.80 1,573.8 943.5 5.05 2,806.3 3,681.1 3.85 1,623.1 1,023.4 5.10 2,855.6 3,822.6 3.90 1,672.4 1,105.8 5.15 2,904.9 3,966.6 3.95 1,721.7 1,190.7 5.20 2,954.2 4,113.1 4.00 1,771.0 1,278.0 5.25 3,003.5 4,262.1 4.05 1,820.3 1,367.8 5.30 3,052.8 4,413.5 4.10 1,869.6 1,460.0 5.35 3,102.1 4,567.3 4.15 1,918.9 1,554.7 5.40 3,151.4 4,723.7 4.20 1,968.2 1,651.9 5.45 3,200.7 4,882.5 5.50 3,250.0 5,043.7 • .. d 9 • Sheet2 Weir Calculation Q=3WH^1.5 US Q post 1.7 Q pre 0.69 Q dis 1.01 ft H 1.2 rim elevation - weir elevation W=Q/3H^1.5 ft _ in W= 0.256111 3.073332 Weir width = 3.073332 inches wide Page 1 1'L ? r lu! 0 1 0 op t, pom 0 ( 6 g14 FLD2005-07065 566 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 07/01/2005 HESS ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED CLWCoverSheet karwater U Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205.0 is CASE #: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST. * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: 727-463-4377 PROPERTY OWNER(S): AGENT NAME: _ Keith E. Zayac. P.E.. RLA MAILING ADDRESS:. 701 Entemrise Road. Ste 404. Safety Harbor. FL ,,34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: keithAkeithmac.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 64 Bay Esplanade. 566 Bay Esplanade LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached ('d not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See Attachment A PARCEL SIZE: (acres, square PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT. 21 condominium units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment 6 Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) • DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) iE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. ? 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use ''f 1 a b 'I TIntly impair the value thereof_ i I See Attachment C ,? .J ?? L r 2005 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or. e'neighborhood of thb4Wk 6i?ed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. See Attachment C 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C ? 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) - Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Attachment D • 0 Z The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Attachment D 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. i See Attachment D - 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the compreh in If reent o' otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D Jm tb 1 2005 ? `" 7y , 6. MAN i(v? The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infll redevelopment-projedcw4 u 9,'a-e'ttie'i mmediiate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. See Attachment D E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exeml to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT T-?Vy ? IV?1 b)LF?E 11? BI (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following)?` I ZUUJ [UU Stormwater plan as noted above is included pp 6 Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a gr, du h' ' ?firiished floor eleva be provided. ?^ ?tok . - .. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) ? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; ? LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; ? GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): _ All dimensions; North arrow; (? E - INAL Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; 0 I v Location map; _ Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; All required setbacks; All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening (per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ? SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ? REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site pi :U One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; ft(t Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parce p ?6 2QW All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); _ Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 2 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. x Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. ?? ii 9 f 2005 L. SIGNATURE: ''"'----?--- PLANNING ,? is C:S7Y C N'T I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to thi be-st-of?riay_ 4,x,;9 knowledge and authorize City epresentatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn t and subsc ibed before me this 1(0 day of ?U192 A.D. 20 aS to me and/or by j T ?t4ri , who is personally known has produced rc as identification. Nota public, •,•1;R?""••. LYDIA RODRIGUEZ No commission expires: uvJ 1 "2 G0 5 _ Notary Public - State of Florida My Commission Expires Nov 7, 2005 Cornmiasion S DD 070740 Bond-J By National Notary Aaan. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: t c , '? . l- F 5 'SAY fif.,,?- A-,PV P fI?S (Names of II property owners on deed - plea a PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): Stephen Hess C S; I F l j_ !° r G 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) See attachment IFfor list of requests ',GINAI 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA 0 0 as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and rrect. Property ner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Bef re me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned by the laws oft'hf State of Florida, on this qrf , 20016 personally appeared ?eXr7 T. Heo-t- Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: 6y -7t .1005, LYDIA RODRiGUEZ Notary Publkc - State of Florida ' . My Commission Expires Nov 7, ? •' Commission 0 DD 070740 Bonded By National Notary Assn. 1v ?..: _.: rte. ? ..._....s-i ....?, .. to dE who having been first duly sworn 011f,14 Notary Pu-4"1) - blic S:IPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc j ay ? 2005 _ ,=a _ i oilOL ??? 9 ATTACHMENT A PARCEL NUMBERS • 05/29/15/54756/079/0180 05/29/15/54756/079/0020 PLAW4 jill a? ' ai- r I 1 2005 j i • ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Increase in height from 35 ft to 52 ft from FEMA to midpoint of roof. • Termination of non-conforming 8 overnight accommodations and conversion to 6 multi-family condominium units. Q a 2005 17F' } PLAN" fly OR?G\tiP?. i ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Increase in height from 35 ft to 52 ft from FEMA to midpoint of roof. ORIGINA?- r u; . , a 0 # ATTACHMENT C GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed Mediterranean architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 21 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the three previously approved Napenthe, LaRisa I and LaRisa II projects 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 21 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the existing motel developments. There are no proposed uses other than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The parking is designed within a fully within a parking garage and use only one 24-foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the project. The proposed 33 parking spaces exceed the required parking spaces required by code. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. JUL 1 1 2005 0 The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by implementing a Mission Spanish flavor suggested by City code. 6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage with no exterior parking. The project only contains 21 residential units, and will not include any commercial or other businesses. .o. 0 0 ATTACHMENT D RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and development standards. The applicant is only requesting an increase in height from 35'-0" to 52 feet. The property is an existing motel property with a front minimum width of 107.13 ft. The building width is designed to accommodate a 24 ft wide driveway, 33 19-ft parking spaces and associated stairs and trash room. The remaining open space, which exceeds code minimum, is heavily landscaped with minimal grass to offset the requested setback deviations. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of each unit are well in excess of $600,000, which will increase the property values of the neighborhood. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. - The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi- family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use designation 5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. PLAN s r' 1 ?{ C:? 0 0 The owner is committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which will be torn down to construct recently approved projects. The development of this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using Mediterranean themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City. The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping includes a combination of palms, hedges and shrubs, which fully encompass the i property. f, p 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of ti Clearwater as a whole. ®- Flexibility in regard to a height increase is requested for this project. The property is currently owned by the applicant and is working with their existing property constraints to create a project that fits the property and is consistent with other recently approved projects within the area. The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the right of way, which. severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The proposed project o'te he:p ki d move it all into an enclosed parking garage e i ?, l;enhance the capacity of the .J L 1 2005 kb Jc.( V . ? i existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior parking. The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that surrounds the building and mitigates for the height flexibility. The building height is offset by the stepped facade of the building along with the enhanced Spanish Mission theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated without the City preferred theme. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required parking per standard code would be provided on-site. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) The "Old Florida" district is an area of transition between resorts and low intensity. The mix of uses favor residential rather than retail. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing buildings and should be low to mid-rise. Lack of parking hinders revitalization of existing improvements particularly on Bay Esplanade. The proposed building consists of a low-density four unit multi-family project and does not include any retail uses. The density of the project is less than required by the Tourist district and with only 21 units is below several of the existing apartment developments in the surrounding area. The building being 52 ft above FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as a mid-rise building consistent with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of development. The project includes all required parking on-site and within the building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Bay Esplanade. D The architecture of the building is generally Spanish Mission in nature, which is consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees, which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved projects along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors. a 2CO5 E En r- ? CD U i_? J iy- 5 ....... r CD BLDG. MATERIALS LEGEND: ul4l.LPHSES, oawrsw.r lam. N•O6MIIp M,q?1pY?4L RAMp1 M.GIRGNl1Lt,tlO Ml1 N•0lM6CI?MIOWIIi! N•KOIf l1?MQN11gI1M1 MIA/:• 71W11AGGBd$ r[r?,re, wi.n,rw?r u.1111 IlmIll MOA1RmWAtMIR1U-MM wf.Qbit"Moll, L1®l~ohgOMlr 14 •?Im?sn?lo.?m9Mr\surUaWwmrLw ?rtea ormrlnal o u.mOLlpie waa?sra4>rlmrn?wnw1m1 o?o6 wnr vwWlweew N+e. wf. Ti.r?Ir10.?On#1Mw11M NOYO. .w=oWNw w1. w?.W?VM#YMrn?latNm®1 .o...R ,N..nsswr?tnacwe?enwlLO.ann - wr.a?aiwlreyww,??comlraaw N•AI?NLWIlRFMt1IR?1 Mi•OgOALtllir/1fIMlRN}CMI[0? N•ALpm KIMY1,?!'d/rWb1UL ?ItIl1 w1.06YMMf Myy/N?r NYNN6Wl GIi0?1 . Gillett Associates ARD-c.., GROUP ... BU Aahittc= • Plo-A, s.em1.•aem•1? . 1543-101 Secmd Seal S?oe? ?P?? 2i6. 941.9574151 F. ddtmm 1 '- w-_AO_ sw% ELEVATION e ? r i(_rv 60/lF N 1$h 1" =10' Z O ¦ x H DATE: ME =005 Qo Copyright 2006 SCALE, 1. 9ourH g1,g9AT10N SHEET NUMBER, A3.02 6 it c a ? ? ? 1 _ - z ... MPQIM.P f s'afAa',S LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE -••-••-••+ PRDECr 6 ARY NOTE a l . '? I .T. TIME ro BE NOV. D j 1 A 4+ <aoal.r ?p m I I PRCPOYD GONGiET[ PARNING ~ HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL tI I n 1 2 ? A? j! l?J GENERAL NOTES: HANDICAPPED SIGN DETAIL EE: Nm m 1. ENGNEUTILANDSCAPE ARCIITECT: KEITH ZAYAC a ASSOCIATES, INC. 701 ENIERPTOSE ROAD EAST, SUITE 40t N O m S Z Pl SAFETY HARBOR. R ]1695. 727 79] 9888 B ( - u4 c72] 793-9055 Ft- z W SITADE E ADDRESS: LWA`'L Gal F P ID: IS151756/079/0020 VI m m6 BA 28. SITE ApORESy 568 BAY E4'1A11A0E SITE MWAI R F D; C . 6 , CLE E L Q10 PARCEL 10: 05/29/15/54756/079/0100 U zavwc: 'r 3. PRESENT USE 8 OVER NIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS 4. NVELOPEO USE 21 MULTITANIIY CONDOMINIUM UNITS 5. TOTAL SITE AREA 24,258615E (0.55 AC) a e. SETBACKS: REWIRED P80PDSE0 q 10-tS' FRONT 16.A' MIN. (SWTH TO BLDG.) a 1500' MIN. (SOUTH 1D OVERHANG) O 15.00' MIN. (EAST TO BLDG.) ? z '5.00' NW. (NEST TO BLUG.) d 0-'0' SIDE 15.OD' MIN. (NORTH TO BLDG.) O a 10.74' MIN. (NORTH TO SDEWALx) W 7 A WA E MAX H IGHT 35'-100' FT Q W F.• , LLO BL E PROPOSED BLO. HEIGHT 52'-0' MOO FEMA UNE TO MW-POINT OF ROOF 0 U) IN. S. SOLID WASTE OUWSTER VIOL BE LOCATED M BUILDING I H T [[??37 ] low 9. UI RNG WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDAR ES WLL SE ATTAC ED O BUILDING AND MILL BE SUBMITTED AS PMT OF FINAL BLINDING PLANS . U 10. EXI51ING WIU NG FOOTPRINT AREAS - 6,051.26 SF = 0.15 AC. 11. ALL UISTURSED GRASS WITHIN Rtl T-OF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. 12. ALL UNUSED ORRVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB SOEWAUC AND LANOSCARNG TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS ACE 13. FLOOD ZONE: MS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOW ZONE 'AE' AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOW INSURANCE RATE MM NO. 121WC0102G (ELEV 11) GATED: SEPTEMBER J. 203 14. A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACRACE WLL BE SUBMITTED ouRa UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPUCATION. NP'T Un 15. THERE ARE UTIUTY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE SURVEY ON THIS PROPERTY. 16. THERE ARE NO ENMROMENTALLY U AME AREAS 0 SM. % 17. A $200 RECREATION FACJUTY IMPACT FEE IS WE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PN10R TO a ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS OR FMAL PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) NHICH EVER OCCURS FIRST. CONTACT ART KAMR AT 727.562.024. 1B. DUMPSTER SERVICE SHALL BE ARRANGED WITH SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE .. ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL UCENSE OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. g PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT 727.562.4930 I CW , I x 19 SITE OATH TABLE. P91P..0$E BEB?D: E>95 ? . W __ ICON AC) 1 11 5 6 5 .9 2 RCW ?- RO 3 SF (0. 9 AC) 121 93 9 (002 AC NW.) B. MT.M. OPEN SPACE: 67 SZ 4 (0. AC ) 8323. 2 g f RCW C WWARG FWTPRWT: 6,972.68 SF (028158) 14,65715 3 (0.60 MR) p E. SDEWMNIDEC/PAVW EA 10.41.41 S 1,2634 = FC F. MAL UIPERMOIS AEA: 17,48409 S (an 19) 15,9]518 3 (065 M) 21.01967 7 (095 a MAMf 0 PA8040 SPACES 10 9+ACES M SPACES 2S5 (I.5 9ALESmn 6 K VEIAQILAR AREA: N/A N/A - 1. WTEROR IANDSCM`E AILFA: N/A M/A x/A J. OVEBNIOIT ACCOMMODAIDO S 8 UM1S 0 UMTS x/A K WOTPA LY CDi = UY IMM 0 UNITS D UNITS 17 UNITS (30 UMIS/AD>E) IT 3 OF 5 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING ONLY ' IS SUE DATE: 07.07.05 C.QDZ I wewrem ?? ? .b Y ^p PeopD.rwYv A Lai h xS+ .wn. .m m°I.w PLAIT SPACING DETAIL (SECTION) ;?, vmu Rm..s u PALM PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. Ai 92 r it PwY *mu ar U GRAPFRC SCALE ORIGINAL ANDSCAPE NOTES G EN E L eemneror emu areeP Dbepv e.v.. e. r.ear.v. ro pm..a w.rb. aamw me pen.m pl;mem t. tpeme° ? n Z ?+ . x. w vdMplrcnuumaN? n?mmugb N M u Yeruey Gca No. to u aYuc h W Dbpo ca O:Ym d Pbm mOUW baM uW Srmaaa. Iv Rurvv Dbnu•. ?' ? i u ? ? 'f` F D ODE u mlu0 M1em m u m tam u • . a. w daewv Yw a aer. b eannare. mm aR Rpa Ra.evm.;. e,a rvR.e . w.oDbva. awro..e D•aued a ' -?` ` Y y .. wWDI ? xYa e. I.uw . o b mgwd? .m m. MMV•^ xo-laa tmw e. D. W "°we.mr.. q.wim? ? `a x Dbrrap ml emD a W eDweYmem wmeDeeP p rme..: ? pD sDx neW p ytm -EUm.m.C w.aual 'mr mde ow bD wl. .Mb c OeaC pDad W W'vW'M rW ?po orb n1v-ralm'D roD.+IY. It .MI aYO b 1n. d aY aben.ou. a.W S C ?p a ? j x uw a. ne4 R w av c w aenmy e.w. Ywl r.wn e r lera d crDw mden, .Nay M1 b p .emr.a-m ene :rndbuar. ? 5 v. r?D?em memnel .waw. ;. nne.rnp re. a. aempu.m. a W laeD.mpr eereveb.. b W ...rn d e mR pbn ab mP pool MPY• W Dbn Mw pewll. ClDCnpwxf . .• Tom. I, 9. W? c? Canlrasb u? ro h+I eam W Yu me W O;a evumnb. 6c.pwan oati?f fv p ? w } '? ? i ?? ou ? iul ed ill n npM.C b W ton<cPP NcYtM YrrrP tl w.lex a m'rpary. W ecwre ewe p nop eRC. cpVOd mvp.Wr rv foeur. b rpvt wm ?M1aaumr: > I> .r,cr. w m. Dal a W sorw.ceD. cp?.b. el u. br. a way. - !! _(? f ?: la. .ow. Canbpta em p e.c.ovx eDVUeatl. De.mm e?D Ir..,... le D.derm m° 'ru:: o n` _ r . ml. wn w a . uw i I OC w u cACleD wbDP wwwMa., al .Na mrd m. tuM.49D. ManllM I I. Dbnlp ? ? M :, .nre a ;nbnmb aw t (. v yw. o m Ix. W eM ell adDDew m+umlry mP aar M eM/p Dppf<euvn euD u aM.a b W bwcvp.tM (nn na-uses = z ty I . .Der. > .<Dmdbn. rDmw W .rRl.r Rwratl tl W e..e. e ? ? z puaav eve pwontu. w erRlnG part wr.:oo-xb tw D Demo a ro.n. M) mpW lrvm film 11. {enaPCCp c rorw p mP p..r ?n . c ab«ep Cenwctw ao? ro bb?D. rpnM 'mwaarr. I%cymw. ea Ix w t ? e 44 In RS m C . rc pv w m w umr. F Y O'll.ier"f,.,l.e w y lab=rn?..'p`et'x•'vpeai;oa'mt 16' n. ?i?w y ro n cro'aai ?ern : a ?a m a . . D D v Iv. w prm,m ..D...en a. m a Drer•;a.e M m. mYnumv eenw.br wwe eu1..;D. w.aneYb Ydee ? W .D.ar<v td ye pnVectw bwmilae4en Yeu eW p Demitue m NP point PvM la W projM urrormouon YDU. o U 19. EriNy DW em p nrnoM u pv.ub b aecemeeeu pe pmuryD. /ry uuDiy auD tlM m Cblurb0 NNq W bpPppP bddloDOn ewl M nROeeve en SL Iepu4nP lrpluvn•. nap <anbanv .W M ngwedP fp W reDPCDaru renaV. ece Cfie OM1PUa tl anY wC m CPCru 21. a.rwdw amrrv W c.roveDp a ma aatM, w a.e. an.m.a .vnm evrn a .ev emD p wp.a. ? d q a z _ ? w IRRIGATION NOTES C' (x I. . Iw nlum. arr4d'urr 4Yem We, t?aDrvYCU I(IOa so.vW. <u m poW+M ae.uev. •+ aaa'Pe w W earvm.. Z /-. 3 x. W prgown ImyDW. snarr men m..t a scum a ?Dw?. b we. r.w . (I.P., pew rmP Prnrro'en. wwpta Re.r aee.. aD._) V Q W a. Irmvabe .vnm m»t a wpaa pla ewDma w t..apew ww? p N mnN 1nboDp mwt mM ab abP DPCt<n ]-rxW.t %pwbP D?Cef cvwoDP, wn DMWP c ran .uu.ar an0 Wnv. W S L.1 b??lr c1 neavkcup. ?. eu ? M b w i t me l bb e/vimP mupw wYxu.a Ima wcDOrr ab emparca W aeceneR wb pK «iDpr fa W x W E4 :MgoDm <? Uma .Im W Cued rmwety. 0. W IdiwaD Meelbr eplvn wnwvub .i M eDDab, pv sa meMeeEnn' Ppp;IkoyenP. ta? CmtM >oYry Fmilln lN. ROAOIF? R uacd ! 6bfl n y o e u - I• kTC4k VaNs Yrruc 10 - Reurre Vdu Be.. PLANT LIST TR 12 sn ewlPi..m, GDmwPDim (IrnzciKj rc 12 W--.- spmenvm PWt z yen.(IORr.) w RI RyuWDYInIkA4eeYSma 33=4x1'1 ne Prv mDmrreTew. v.ry ,v.Iy.w amwaDmen.?arRJrne m ss eD.m. RnPA eabcae rm..svw. a U Cf) C] I 5 OF 5 SIMI6 ! WnlIDCavP FuRNW CRN r i 2005 /Atr N N LAGUNA ORIGINAL ON BAY ESPLANADE RESIDENCES CLEARWATER BEACH, FLORIDA u e CD O ?". i U Q ?? CD Cm CD i 1•t ?` ?i If 1 1 WO 21 26 6TAR 48 4 2mb ( EW ma I 24 ter 1 f 22 HOLDW 29 21 Yt 2v 19 $ ' a >a n e ; a : = ? I " b SS SPAN a s s,oa > q a a, x t ti 1 1 1 u'W 9 4 b ` 1 3 9 y a Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Axchimctuce. Planing Sm.en.Muml.Imdoe 1541101 Saxnn loci& 342M 941-957-+ 4736 941-957-1477 941-9571151 Pax r 1 ' Via. ? w of z g o 0 mull £ ? w 7o70r.1MAr1?Ifal MA. rww oa?an?owor.wr wrr CZAR#Ar&R ,ST may,?, (BA r mm. Itlll1 1 11= 101-011 . f. V-0' m? ?srr ram A1.01 N 4 w 4 C 1r 5U (L rD[ Nr-:; AfRE A TA5UL A I I OI & SPACES UNITS ENCLOSED BLDG TERRACE AREA (SF) GROSS PARKING LEVEL 1 33 0 14,648 PARKING LEVEL 2 6 12659 1989 PARKING LEVEL 3 6 12659 1989 TYPICAL LEVEL 4 5 IS28 6720 TYPICAL LEVEL 5 4 7928 2634 TOTAL BUILDING. RESIDENTIAL UNITS : 21 UNITS TOTAL ENCLOSED BUILDING AREA: 55,620 TOTAL TERRACE AREA: 13,332 CONDO PARKING: 33 SPACES (INCLUDING 2 NC) CD Cr_ O Z L 1 T 2m OF L ? ? d ?+f E 3 , - 'f i`. C• 1 4 ru?C`f _ M"11 h 2470 OP Gillett Associates ARD e.G ROUP 1543101 S...d Saar S-t ,19odda 34236 911-957-4477 941-957-41511.. a z g o ¦ BUILDN3 , • •GY mmm 1 it = 10'-0" E F aGATT _ •GALL f . f0'-O' mummm RY A2.01 CD O WTF X w 8F - ? 9 . •'y dry, O BUU. NS PLAN rani WMRR M!Q 19t = 10t-0" Gillett Associates A i GROUP s-- _• •nc.?.lmcm 1543101 Seed S- S•-' Florida 342'46 941-957-4471 941-957-4151 Fss dd(gllmu& - 4 wl? ZQ? z g o O ooo,ro..oos noN.e ,• . w.o? aaw !Y1 !QIM um 4 A2.02 S __j CD 0 2420 6 IYJ LDM ? r ?CYY NINI? I'1= 101-011 Gillett Associates ARDT GROUP Arc6imcwm • PJ°°°i°8 sm,m.ns+.a.l.dmo 1543101 Se-d S- S-t no6& 34236 941-957-4477 941-957-4151 Fv 3W W W e ? OoW'?IW >f0n? snug r . w-r sotavo PIM ea?eowN um s s1?r rum A2.03 ORIGINAL Z 8 RMI aP?CW Olfll 1MG710W r -irwrrr ? .. `?w?ra ar ?? .• ?IMOM??1 Alrr• OaYa Irrl xr.r 1. Arrr.-I-Y.-.rwrrrrlt...?Ywn- IrrF r r rrr r 1Y1 r r Orrr. a .Yr rt. r r rrrr r r)wr. r xr.Y• r+rr r rrr. r rr .A.r. r r rr r rrr i-nao r?wa xOCa rwx, r rr. r? ? r i.. ? tr ?.+?. rr rwYY r ..w r.w r rrlrr ?•'?s r r .ar) w r r rrr. r rrr. • i rr? Orrr rr rrwrr r 1r+?r r rw rwY r) i Yrwr rr rr a i rw pWrlr. • i Orr.) Yri rwvr rrrr r M raa A r rrrrr rrrw r.rr wWr YO orrra Arrfdrwvr) rrr r MIS - Ilrr . ri Orr. Orr rrr rrr - Nr/w 1' •vwr yr rrr - K rr rr ra NT LIST 41:7 r" f: A, 1. i Iw+.w Or.r w+ r.. iq+r Y rrr rrr arw r r.+ rrt. ow V? a r err ti r rrr rrr r r w1.1 r..?rr a. 1- ?r...a.? rr r. w r o•? lrrtr W. i nr err r wr r ?) ?irr. ?i.rr rr rr r ra ' a r .rat r r ar Y trr. a Y tir nr)rr.r1 r rrti warar rrr w+w.. ? r w.xra?r r rw a yr. r-u-s r.r . r. r ..rre rrrrar r y..r a a rw+? r r r r wrrr rr s r r s .?r rr srYO w ?ir".i +Y.?a+ rr+.? .??rrr++? ?.?.rr¦ r? . w?ti w .r.?r. w r.wr r... ..o.r a r rr+? w. r r.r . ?r pr r ?? wr. rr r r r rrw+ w rrrra ). ?? Y.'r'rirrr Yom. r r r r.... r r i.rr. r.r. r r r.+ w . rv.r ?Y?rw r r. r ..a • r wlw? t Y w?.rrY w? ? rrrr? M? rrl/ M rr•1 Mwrr r M w•w.l a i Y.rM Orr. rr r wr.nYly M? r r r r Y W rxwr iYrrrr r ir...rrr rrlrrrtrrr rrr.rr.rr Yryrrr.r Wtir r ?wr?"rMrl srwrYYwY?rl r?si?. r Y. ww ? r M r Y?rw. brrr WrF M r w. ni A? Iril r M ?`ias ?1 ? ?rrl ?rwr ...? r rwr r Maw v?. + r w?i ? rir ? 'tea r as r r r+w• rrr xa rJ l?iri•? ?r? r )r r ..yr ?++• r r irr r r rrn. rrr u n..rr..r.•rr ...rrr arrrr w..rrrr... N i I?r Ora.wr r wrrYr Y rr• rr rrr•y r.. rM / Yvrv (tp .r. rr r rxrrr. rYr??w. 1• `fir Y r OrrFri.O.? r 1yrr?r?. rOmrrlr?MrrrY rrrrw. wWr?Y?r?Y?aryrar???r rY K r?wrrrw?rW/W r??l?YOr? wMr rw.rriM r? YY. ?Y/ it r .w t • .Mrs t). ¦wr•.s)wrrwrrrrrrWl-, w -r*rr rrrrir K r rrr. urr.r. yr r r rrr) .? r ? s.w r r r)V r.r. r.. IO. arr) r r r w , r rrr) r rrrrrr r rM rr .Ya. .s r w YMr ry r YrW.. Wi r r ?r? a r..l?a. i l?? Err. r M rlrrrl r i rrra rw• r Ar arwr r w r• ra trr Orr1 r Yrrr r rr wOr• r wr wrYr rY iW w 1 rr1 Y Par •wv?.v. i,wo..m.. vrnn•. x ow.: in vrv rr.v?wm*r. v.ro-v.r...rvm.wvn.,xar a,r?rac. xo r rr. e... c..e c,.a o.v. a c.. Al m lip W QQ a 6 6 of 5 PALM FLAX" OVAL IIT, ORIGINAL PALM PLANTMG DETAIL N.TB. ref o?Q? ?? >p at °# es n.e.nro. •o.,rao I `?< r ?'?'•• nvrnww PLANT SPACING DVAIL <SECViq ev11O"d°'""'f? aw,.r.aua.n.®w EMdC f ARgBBOCaKF ,..•? GRAPHIC SCALE ?: >.?.».?s?win.m ' man r¢r )ry GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES I. awnr as-?np• cw,«rw .I?a v=ee earl«B e.e.. e, ,<c?n•w. le p•e•w >mlm< a•ebw, ero v«ed. ept:m?,m z ]- ?« ? aro am, mx..ieb fa M a•oma m xer,wY c.ae< xe. , e, h IM rbaea r.:«,, wbiwr er ram bam«Y 'ueao eea u m ns is wr.«Y >aeu : cw, w .. S. e e ? :%?a yy N 3 ? ? l _ I I ee, ? I f . mi ' tr] J. .Ia pkntaB eM1M M ee« m ewarav«< e an n< Itwga «wm]•ned, oM Geae: a Afwciwiw, wwaee pmwaea. .. «?a«„ .n M ,e«?fetl .Bn ?a.m ]?,o-l,abk,a ?, a the mwwMwm wM?eBw, „ wa„?,aa ells 5. ne penll? noY bet Qawra+mwe p ? of rvnovf: ?faq env SOx or9o'tle metwa camMUq M h o ro ex a . BM , erLe of as tl roy aX ?I<w? M t .lran ? ?a b b er- vo o e , e • n9 wp« Y . w.ir aT mat,. ,Imes. ewm. ti wmge a 6. xl dantlrp a•,m ,Fan receive o 1' bye• of cYwem mukn, vmM H o wt<r -m er Im,ol .t ] belveent 1M pa aM ln< dvn M dan and p ervl. ,ne W<w« ?n,.a<,w. bi IM1e e.eel W a tla<nperic o i 8. m t use, een ,pcRVe«ona. MY atewi nel mM B ,peeaieatlw, ,nan M •emaw ona fr.pa?.e a, IM romr?ias .mwf?. <Iw m i Ly? 9 l re G_: Iwevemaln? ? 9. p tomm'nw fMll M re tLe fu one IM ? ewummte BHCrewndea e a ?- V '' -11W a . to ? ?M wndwbn Iw lollare le epw e« vp o < x 6 fi f ? ` .«n doom o- ,« e,•e., e, me pax eiYiM ierofrar< en«Ma, w IM bm< weke,nB. 55 1 O F t0. I, lei o« ConlreNm fnoN pe wn ,^Tk Iw Bas mceaaa•y eppkebk x,rmb ane 4ccmef to ve wm tM . u o pbn M aM • ap« ae,mv. l ,I. M bq of tpeNW umnf anaabde. at rain u teom nv ke q le .nt:q v, inmcte cnvgea. xme Inv Lmrmm« MMnM • ? . M f write ?riq parr M va/w weeltrtJm, flw M ®.Mee Io IM Inne.wp. w<uIM 1 IT ? w ? d d f>nl ]B. -B990 i s] 4 ? IJ. Mre ,Ma M w a«uam. ednar, w fwrtaWan .xMW ,M .,mea www,ol el IM a.n,. 2 ZZ .] 4 le. TM?Mfw« eM,Mw dbll Bawwrke.:r e.XB,B, do-q aar?,meei,Y m, a «,aa w ted.e nx) maven. Imm rmd « eM. n .M e.», ? a . ¢ m Iz w ». Ba am, 4? I, mM - ..<a N ,M arna«w< cono-aaw wAr w bnmwx mm<rwl artaw,lw. af<r<pwrro .naa lh w . le bna«o . 1w, n d ? my ? ? r N ? p . tr r.kn r•ok<I u la: ,ea eo-e<e em e a?.mmw waxa<to- w ro oediaad ce it h tM n m ? ,M awo¢eq < m.Mw wk„ wM..be ,p«nkeq ,Twee m ue q.<Irkaa I]. u pwm..«..,o-r o-e to M wwla.a bY ? m ,e. w <w,.Mw aMlnwla. rtB.r, .nan M pematw w me wain. e.cw, ,w Inc p•e).w a,o-mwan ,qm. U ,B. FvMaq ,W aroa be rempr,e m neweaary ,o a«omWvte nee pbntaaf 11 -. :g weo, trot we dv,wlrN swag lM bemcope Imfoawb. ,non M •e,oetletl efln St. 4p.A,fe TWnom p Contr«,w v wmMe Iw wMwan, r«w.al, wv woper d,pmal w anY aetl ae mwH a<m,wee ewxq IM a.rtw1- of ?tnH waict. ,M 6 ul wem cawMe enm a el ea< ,roa be aaetletl. 22. q a o z ? ? a IRRIGATION NOTES O a 0. U I. < imgata, ,YM e. t p• +a o d p spa, e ee da,raB,.I?.X m.,B,.etl w alae m M Contra I<w? O E--F 3 Q v y M Dm m, mee. « nwe m <c ?m ? t a al t ? Ne w e U z rwuireme rrl (Ii cv fl ov Werrnbw. .fWOmoac r Snu oil e e. ?..) rt d z 3 trXBwa. yftem must x a,pect<tl we o«wtre h YaM«ew a,Maew . .?iM mart mwt <Il cove ,velar 3-I tOl.t o- w < osa w ? ..7 () a <r ew w< a ,ela ,en>w ro I««r. to q< ,o <w ? ? a Iwta, os-aan erc wa, eNan «<ww.N aM dewM gemlry ae memrkocwa 3 l/w aubatitolaro. must M aWmMea wk. to and BvwcWn aM «ttvla«e. «we Cwxr«,w m M dv<emem wa wew fµpY lo- IM ar Ha cw«Irrgwlw +ntnn cwr?pwrenb«.l u Wx<etl, px eoM mowlMw<n Irsw wn ? R «d rlmaCOrrpn,wlM Emytn Ehe PLANT LIST w aaip.H.cp.apiaBfo mt+a,rcT2 z u lVae,la^).Bo-aenn. rol,Mmaw r«.r: puE. (,v«r.) ?,?'aI r+,d+arwla megL lmx «eeee<aaau.;xso.c. R P,rv, PwAb,paumTedn vfnp, verp,wepEgyvvee.BdLTf «T.)JPOL. M eelpumam,,>aaL I V Olt 0 ? 2005 vCb 5 of 5 ORIGINAL '--_ HANDICAPPED STALL DETAIL D) (O N.t x Pr ?KN46. . .?R ?s?r6s :•A. r F I1• 14' III I`.III { W # WANDICAPPED SIGN DETAI t z? 'q, u ? LEGEND C (lrP.> TYPICU GRAPHIC SCALE -••.••••••? l-T -All f _ U E x EktSRN. TREE TO BE REMOVED F ?' ? ?y I<X rar 1 { ?T g ern I 1 • m n PROPOffD WNCRETE PARKMG j } ?' ? Tp •i gq g GENERAL NOTES: r 1. ENCINEEF/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KEITH ZAYAC k ASSOCIATES, INC. m N p m ]01 EN ERPR TERPRISE ROAD EAST, SUITE 404 SAFETY HARBOR, FL 34895 S 2 (121) 19>933-98869855f BPS (]21) -aA z .1 Do D. ? 0. 1 0: 2A. SITE ADDRESS: W BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER. FL [+1 ?,., a PARCEL ID: 05/29/15/54756/O79/0020 ?j a g 28. SITE ADDRESS: 566 BAY ESP ANADE CLEAR ATER. FL G I S PARCEL ID: 05/29/15/54)56/0]9/0180 •? U TONING: T PRESENT USE 8 OVER NIGHT ACCOMMODATIONS 4. DEVELOPED USE 21 MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS 5. TOTAL SITE AREA 24,258.615E (0.55 AC) Q 6. SETBACKS: ffmm CEOPOSED 'FR 100--1115' FRONT 16,1>' MIN. (SOUTH TO BLDG (X 15.00' MIN. $WM TO OVERHANG) 0 15.00 MIN. (EAST TO BLOC.) z, 15.00' MIN. (WEST TO BLDG.) Q 0-10' SIDE 15.00' MIN. (NORTH TO BLOC.) O Q 10.]A' MIN. (NORM TO SDEWAU() W . W ]. ALLOWABLE MAX HEIGHT 35-100' FT Q E PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT 52'-0' FROM FEMA LINE TO MID-PANT OF ROOF O In 8. SOLID WASTE DUMPSTER WILL BE LOCATED IN BUIDING r^ [sQ] 9. LIGHTING WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDARIES WILL BE ATTACHED TO BUILDING AND WILL BE SUBMfTMD AS PART OF FINAL BURDtNG PLANS. U } u l 10. E%ISIINC BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS - 6,831.26 $F 0.15 AC. yp 11. ALL NSTLRBED GRASS WITHIN RIGHT-CF-WAY SHALL BE SODDED. S 12. ALL UNUSED DRIVEWAYS MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB SIDEWALK, AND LANDSCAPING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS 13. FLOW ZONE: THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE -AE" AS DEPICTED ON FEMA FLOW INSURANCE RAZE MAP N0. 1210MO102C (ELEV 11) DATED: SEPTEMBER 3, 2003 1.11 14. A COMPREHENSVE SIGN PACKAGE WILL BE SUBMITTED I/ I-AID UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION, 4 # 15. THERE ARE UTILITY EASEMENTS IDENTIFIED BY THE SURVEY ON d N THIS PROPERTY. 16. THERE ARE NO ENAROMENTALLY UNIWE AREAS ON SITE. 17A 92W RECREATION FACILITY IMPACT FEE IS WE FOR EACH NEW UNIT PRIOR TD c ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS W FINAL PLAT (IF APPLICABLE) WHICH EVER OCCURS FIRST. CONTACT ART KADER AT ]2].562.41324. g 113. GUM TER SERVICE SHALL BE ARRANGED WITH SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO THE • • ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. q PLEASE CONTACT TOM GLENN AT 727,562 4930 7 19. 2rz MATH TARLL Exalla: P%?SC EE?REP: A TOI& SE AREA: 24,258.61 4 (0.55 AC) 24.256.61 4 (0.55 AC) 0,001).00 ff T B. TOTAL OPEN PACE: 6.774.52 SF (015 AC) 6.321.13 ff (0.19 A[) 1.21393 4 (0.02 AG MM.) V C, MDMG FWiPRMT: 6.972.68 SF (0.28 ISP) 14.652.15 SE (0.60 ISR) - ? E. SaruK/DEl/PAKD AKA: 10.511.41 9 T2]B33 ff - Y M F. TOTAL MPERWWS AREA: 12,4&.09 ff (0.R 191) 15.935.48 ff (065 I1 23,045.62 9 (095 RR MAX) y 0. PARKING SPACES: 10 SPACES 33 SPACES 25.5 (1.5 SPACESA.1) F3 N. VEHINlAR AREA N/A N/A - INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA N/A N/A N/A AM as A 01EW T ACCOMMODATIONS 8 UNITS 0 UNITS N/A L _VAMLY CdQ NUM UNITS D UNITS 21 .116 I> UNITS (J0 UNITS/ACRE) 6H[[i 3 OF 5 I Ali 0 12005 4`ie ?t?i;•P7t?... Cn _'r .:.L 2, -,A I 6 :v r Jy LAGUNA COLOR SAMPLES: 56 WALLS: DOVER WHITE #SW6385 a SW 6385 Dover White TRIM: EGRET WRITE #SW2004 f ORIGINAL ?Ir Line Items: Case No t Check DEL MAR DEVELPT R_D 6141 In Person Payment Total: THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a receipt for an application for a permit. This application will be reviewed and you will be notified as to the outcome of the application. Page 1 of 1 Receipt #: 1200500000000006390 Date: 07/08/2005 7/8/2005 11:33:49AM Tran Code Description Revenue Account No Amount Paid PLT2005-00019 Preliminary Plat 010-341240 600.00 Line Item Total: $600.00 Payments: Method Payer Initials Check No Confirm No How Received Amount Paid 600.00 $600.00 cReceipt.rpt CITY OF CLEAER RPPLICATIONFORPLPPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2°d FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 1-5 -F PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME 1 6 ?? L C-• C . ADDRESS ( o 1 ' (!J 36- (D -'T 6 oq -- G lq A- 1>T PHONE NUMBER (2??' ©? 3y FAX NUMBER ??z? yto r0 s APPLICANTS NAME IW 3 C)r=-01F_?W Ptt&,j l" 1 C- ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER /860 /U• f{,422cSoN ?VF Cu.? f?. :33 Ss' l am) %7- -0-730 FAX NUMBER : -U .?2- 2&.e r-f- V.10. '60 /V - r? . crr-i sbN Cctj FL. 33,7sJ-- 4-U FAX NUMBER : cAG'7- `0 ?3 -2-- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by ?io ?. s 3 ?.. who is personally known to owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me th? ' day of A.D., to me and/or me or has produced as ide ificati n. Notary Public my commission expires: ':.,Commission # DD338456 (-es of the preliminary plat must be submitted: PaNt,.j. Expires August 5, 20 Bonded Troy FYn • Vzmri . Mc EO"WM9 Fourteen 1Zary The prelimi at sha ll be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; M DIMENSIONS AND AREA OF THE FOLLOWING: w THE OVERALL PLAT AND EACH LOT STREETS RIGHTS-OF-WAY, INCLUDING RADII OF CUL-DE-SACS; COMMON OPEN SPACE OR OTHER LAND TO BE DEDICATED FOR A PUBLIC PURPOSE IF ANY. , M CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2°d FLOOR PHONE (727)-5624567 FAX (727) 5624576 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUBMITTAL OF FINAL PLAT INSTRUCTIONS The final plat shall be suitable for recording at the office of the clerk of the circuit court. It shall be prepared and sealed buy a land surveyor registered by the state and shall conform with the requirements of Florida Statute, Chapter 177, and the requirements of this subsection. It shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals 50 feet or other scale determined appropriate by the city engineer. The overall sheet size of the plat shall be consistent with the standards established by the clerk of the circuit court for recording. Each sheet shall be provided with a one-inch margin on each of three sides and a three-inch margin on the left side of the plat for binding purposes. Eighteen (18) copies of the Final Plat must be submitted. ALL FINAL PLATS MUST CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: NAME OF PLAT; LOCATION OF THE PLAT BY U.S. SURVEY SYSTEM AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE, COUNTY AND STATE; NAMES OF EXISTING STREETS ABUTTING RO GIVING ACCESS TO THE PROPOSED PLAT; ALL PLAT BOUNDARIES BASED ON AN ACCURATE TRANSVERSE, WITH ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS SHOWN. ERROR OF ENCLOSURE OF SUCH BOUNDARY SURVEY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE FOOT FOR EACH 10,000 FEET OF PERIMETER SURVEY; ALL BLOCKS, LOTS, STREETS, CROSSWALKS, EASEMENTS AND WATERWAYS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PLAT, ALL OF WHICH SHALL HAVE ALL ANGULAR AND LINEAR DIMENSIONS GIVEN AND ALL RADII, INTERNAL ANGLES, BEARINGS, POINTS OF CURVATURE, TANGENTS AND LENGTHS OF ALL CURVES, SO THAT NO DIMENSIONS OR DATA ARE MISSING WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FUTURE LOCATION OF ANY OF THE CORNERS OR BOUNDARIES OF BLOCKS, LOTS OR STREETS, AS LISTED ABOVE. WHEN ANY LOT OR PORTION OF THE PLAT IS BOUNDED BY AN IRREGULAR LINE, THE MAJOR PORTION OF THAT LOT OR PLAT SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A WITNESS LINE SHOWING COMPLETE DATA, WITH DISTANCES ALONG SUCH LINES EXTENDED BEYOND THE ENCLOSURE TO THE IRREGULAR BOUNDARY SHOWN WITH AS MUCH CERTAINTY AS CAN BE DETERMINED OR AS "MORE OR LESS", IF VARIABLE. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT. TRUE ANGLES AND DISTANCES SHALL BE DRAWN TO THE NEAREST ESTABLISHED OFFICIAL MONUMENTS, NOT LESS THAN THREE OF WHICH SHALL BE ACCURATELY DESCRIBED ON THE PLAT. THE INTENDED USE OF ALL EASEMENTS SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED. CURVILINEAR LOTS SHALL SHOW ARC DISTANCES, AND RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING. RADIAL LINES SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED. DIRECTION OF NONRADIAL LINES SHALL BE INDICATED; SUFFICIENT ANGLES AND BEARINGS SHALL IDENTIFY THE DIRECTION OF ALL LINES AND SHALL BE SHOWN TO THE NEAREST SECOND; M M ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINES SHALL BE SHOWN WITH DISTANCES, ANGLES, BEARINGS OR AZIMUTH, POINTS OF CURVATURE, POINTS OF TANGENCY, POINTS OF REVERSE CURVATURE, POINTS OF COMPOUND CURVATURE, ARC DISTANCE, CENTRAL ANGLES, TANGENTS, RADII, CHORD, AND CHORD BEARING OR AZIMUTH, OR BOTH ALL EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY PROVIDED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES OR UTILITIES, AND ANY LIMITATIONS OF SUCH EASEMENTS; ALL LOT NUMBERS AND LINES. LOT LINES SHALL BE MARKED WITH ACCURATE DIMENSIONS IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS OF FEET, AND BEARINGS OR ANGLES TO STREET LINES; ACCURATE DESCRIPTIONS OF ANY AREA TO BE DEDICATED OR RESERVED FOR PUBLIC USE WITH THE PURPOSE INDICATED THEREON; TITLE, DATE OF SURVEY, GRAPHIC SCALE OF MAP AND NORTH ARROW. THE BEARING OR AZIMUTH REFERENCE SHALL BE CLEARLY STATED ON THE FACE OF THE PLAT IN THE NOTES OR LEGEND; PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENTS SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF THE SATE OF FLORIDA; EACH PLAT SHALL SHOW A DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS PLATTED, AND THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE THE SAME IN THE TITLE CERTIFICATION. THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE SO COMPLETE THAT FROM IT, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE PLAT, THE STARTING POINT AND BOUNDARY CAN BE DETERMINED; THE CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S CERTIFICATE AND THE LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE AND SEAL; ALL SECTION LINES AND QUARTER SECTION LINES OCCURRING IN THE MAP OR PLAT SHALL BE INDICATED BY LINES DRAWN UPON THE MAP OR PLAT, WITH APPROPRIATE WORDS AND FIGURES. IF THE DESCRIPTION IS BY METES AND BOUNDS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING SHALL BE INDICATED, TOGETHER WITH ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES OF THE BOUNDARY LINES. IF THE PLATTED LANDS ARE IN A LAND GRANT OR ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBDIVISION OF GOVERNMENT SURVEYS, THEN THE BOUNDARIES ARE TO BE DEFINED BY METES AND BOUNDS AND COURSES. THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE DESCRIPTION SHALL BE TIED TO THE NEAREST GOVERNMENT CORNER OF OTHER RECORDED AND WELL-ESTABLISHED CORNER; ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES SHALL BE. IDENTIFIED BY PLAT TITLE, PLAT BOOK AND PAGE OR, IF UNPLATTED, LAND SHALL BE SO DESIGNED. IF THE AREA PLATTED IS A REPLATTING OF A PART OR THE WHOLE OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT, SUFFICIENT TIES SHALL BE SHOWN TO CONTROLLING LINES APPEARING ON THE EARLIER PLAT TO PERMIT AN OVERLAY TO BE MADE AND REFERENCE TO THE REPLATTING SHALL BE STATED AS A SUBTITLE FOLLOWING THE NAME OF THE PLAT WHEREVER IT APPEARS ON THE PLAT; ALL LOTS SHALL BE NUMBERED EITHER BY PROGRESSIVE NUMBERS OR, IF IN BLOCKS, PROGRESSIVELY NUMBERED OR LETTERED IN EACH BLOCK, EXCEPT THAT BLOCKS IN NUMBER ADDITIONS BEARING THE SAME NAME MAY BE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY THROUGHOUT THE SEVERAL ADDITIONS; PARK, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PARCELS SHALL BE SO DESIGNATED; ALL INTERIOR EXCEPTED PARCELS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND LABELED 'NOT A PART OF THIS PLAT"; THE PURPOSE OF ALL AREAS DEDICATED MUST BE CLEARLY INDICATED OR STATED ON THE PLAT; WHEN IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SHOW CURVE DETAIL INFORMATION ON THE MAP, A TABULAR FORM MAY BE USED. { .. 7-Aj M THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL PLAT: A TITLE OPINION OF AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE SATE OR A CERTIFICATION BY AN ABSTRACTOR OR A TITLE COMPANY STATING THAT THE COURT RECORDS IDENTIFY THAT THE TITLE TO THE LAND AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN ON THE PLAT IS IN THE NAME OF THE PERSON EXECUTING THE DEDICATION. IN ADDITION, A DOCUMENT ENTITLED CONSENT TO PLATTING OF LANDS AND PARTIAL RELEASE OF MORTGAGE SHALL BE FILED TOGETHER WITH THE FINAL PLAT FOR EACH PERSON OR CORPORATION HOLDING A MORTGAGE ON ALL LAND INCLUDED ON THE PLAT, WHERE SUCH PERSON HAS NOT SIGNED THE FINAL PLAT. THE TITLE OPINION OR CERTIFICATION SHALL SHOW ALL MORTGAGES NOT SATISFIED OR RELEASED OF RECORD NOR OTHER WISE TERMINATED BY LAW; CERTIFICATION BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR THAT THE PLAT REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT ALL THE NECESSARY SURVEY MONUMENTS, LOT SIZES AND LOT DIMENSIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN THEREON, AND THAT THE PLAT COMPLIES WITH ALL OF THE SURVEY REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 177 AND THIS DEVELOPMENT CODE. IMPRESSED ON THE PLAT AND AFFIXED THERETO SHALL BE THE PERSONAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE TO THE REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR INCLUDING THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE SURVEYOR, BY WHOM OR UNDER WHOSE AUTHORITY AND DIRECTION THE PLAT WAS PREPARED; A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PLATTED LANDS. HOWEVER, A NEW BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR A REPLAT IS REQUIRED ONLY WHEN THE REPLAT AFFECTS ANY BOUNDARY OF THE PREVIOUSLY PLATTED PROPERTY OR WHEN IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE ON THE LANDS TO BE REPLATTED OR ADJOINING LANDS. THE BOUNDARY SURVEY MUST BE PERFORMED AND PREPARED UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF A PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER PRECEDING THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL OF THE PLAT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODY. THIS SUBSECTION DOES NOT RESTRICT A LEGAL ENTITY FROM EMPLOYING ONE PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PERFORM AND PREPARE THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND ANOTHER PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER TO PREPARE THE PLAT, EXCEPT THAT BOTH THE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND THE PLAT MUST BE UNDER THE SAME LEGAL ENTITY; CERTIFICATION THAT ALL REAL ESTATE TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID; EVERY PLAT OF A SUBDIVISION OR CONDOMINIUM FILED FOR RECORD SHALL INCLUDE ANY REQUIRED DEDICATION BY THE APPLICANT. THE DEDICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY ALL OWNERS HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND BEING PLATTED, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED. ALL MORTGAGEES HAVING A RECORD INTEREST IN THE LAND PLATTED SHALL EXECUTE, IN THE SAME MANNER IN WHICH DEEDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE EXECUTED, EITHER THE DEDICATION CONTAINED ON THE PLAT OR IN A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT JOINING THE RATIFICATION OF THE PLAT AND ALL DEDICATION AND RESERVATIONS THEREON IN THE FORM OF A CONSENT TO PLAT FROM ALL MORTGAGE INTERESTS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEN A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND HAS BEEN PLATTED AND A PLAT THEREOF BEARING THE DEDICATION EXECUTED BY THE DEVELOPER AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY HAS BEEN SECURED AND RECORDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS DIVISION, ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC AREAS SHOWN ON SUCH PLAT, UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, SHALL BE DETERMINED TO HAVE BEEN DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREON, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY SEPARATE ACTION BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION TO FORMALLY ACCEPT SUCH OFFERS OF DEDICATION; ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PRIVATE RESTRICTION AND TRUSTEESHIPS AND THEIR PERIODS OF EXISTENCE SHALL BE FILED AS A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND REFERENCE TO SUCH INSTRUMENT SHALL BE NOTED ON THE FINAL PLAT; i L M M AFTER A FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED, THREE PRINTS OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHOWING THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE BEE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED SUBDIVISION CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND A COPY OF THE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY ENGINEER BEFORE SUCH PLAT SHALL BE RECORDED. FINANCIAL GUARANTEE: UNLESS ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY COMPLETED, AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY EVERY PLAT WHICH IS TO BE RECORDED TO ENSURE THE ACTUAL SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN NOT MORE THAN TWO YEARS FOLLOWING THE DATE OF THE RECORDING, OR ONE YEAR IF SIDEWALKS ARE THE ONLY REQUIRED IMPROVEMENT TO BE COMPLETED FOLLOWING THE DATE OF RECORDING. AN ACCEPTABLE FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS, AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AND MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE INCREASED IF THE CITY ENGINEER DETERMINES IT APPROPRIATE AND MAY BE REDUCED FROM TIME TO TIME IN PROPORTION TO THE WORK COMPLETED, AND MAY TAKE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY; CASH, TO BE HELD IN A SEPARATE ESCROW ACCOUNT BY THE CITY; OR AN IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT WRITTEN BY A BANK CHARTERED BY THE SATE, THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, OR ANY OTHER STATE OF THE UNITED STATES IF THE BANK IS AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY MANAGER. THE LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL INCLUDE AMONG OTHER THINGS, AN EXPIRATION DATE NOT EARLIER THAN ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ISSUANCE; A PROVISION REQUIRING THE ISSUER OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT TO GIVE AT LEAST 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO EXPIRATION OR RENEWAL OF THE LETTER; AND A PROVISION THAT THE LETTER IS AUTOMATICALLY RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TIME EQUALING ITS ORIGINAL TERM OF THE REQUIRED NOTICE IS NOT GIVEN; OR A SURETY BOND ISSUED BY A SURETY COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE. THE SURETY BOND SHALL INCLUDE, AS A MINIMUM, THE PROVISION REQUIRED FOR LETTERS OF CREDIT. S:\Planning Department\Application Forms\development review\Plat Approval Application - 6-23-2003.doc OcUiAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE 2 1*6 FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME C /? ADDRESS (D pC (Q 3? (p I?>?YSpc njJ?r PHONE NUMBER (???? 3y FAX NUMBER -O 73a- APPLICANTS NAME /M 3 I3 ?W PH&v f- L C _ L , ADDRESS 18(oo /U• ? , ?2ar--c ?1 /g?F Ct,,, FL 33 Ss PHONE NUMBER a -o,730 FAX NUMBER YG -7- -y 3 2_ AGENT NAME ?r-t- `J?S? V.10. ADDRESS ISGO /U . 'FL I. 1 rr s ?? ,qu f, Cc,., FL 3773-1-- PHONE NUMBER '&-4 -U ?U FAX NUMBER • ?7 'a ? 3 -2 I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS representations made in this application Sworn to and subscribed before e th' 4- of are true and accurate to the best of my A.D., to me and/or knowledge. by who is personally known to me or has produced as ide ifi ati n. L ;Signature o owner or re resentative Notary Public my commission expires: Gregory A. F-Q-X ,w 4.ear4WTmyFWn Commission # DD338456 Fourteen (14) c . pies of the preliminary plat must be submitted: Expires August 5, 2008 i• Morena, Inc. pOpAlS7019 The prelimi ary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; :n 4 IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; t LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; t.uj EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; C' I PROPOSED STREET NAMES; = Z? zo NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; t? CITY OF CLEAR TER APPLICATION FOR PLA APPROVAL U PLANNING DEPARTMENT B oa PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME C ADDRESS ??vSPc?9MN) r PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER FAX NUMBER : Z7-R-/-) it, -7 --O 3?- ?3? ?EwPFci-- 1_L.C / 1864 /LJ. lTi9 GSo.?1 /}yF C Fc . 33 Ss %7- -0,z3 L) FAX NUMBER YG -1 --U 7 3 2- I SGO N - rf . Ik,- r- r- i s ,}u r C'c,.-, Fc 3 77r -4 -0wwo FAX NUMBER : Let '7- _0 iz 3 -.L- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by who is personally known to ignature of owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before rr]e this r day of A.D., to me and/or me or has produced aside ificati n. Notary Public my commission expires: DD338456 ' ,. VB Commission # Fourteen (14)/co/pies of the preliminary plat must be submitted: ;a ExpiresAugust 5, 20 TIry FMn. knunnM Inc. E008eSM ry dIGd The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information! NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; G7 ti :_ LULP CM si3 CIE z? Z?' CITY OF CLEAR TER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2°d FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME C/ ?? / L-• C . ADDRESS (oOC'1. CO3? (D -5 7 k3 19;- z-SPc?9n }1?r PHONE NUMBER APPLICANT'S NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER (2?? 9?7-0 73o FAX NUMBER -O 32- M3L3 ? r WPK ? L-L,C- 18 60. AJ . !:::t . #A RaT:_ O A-J /4,4 cam. ?? . 3 ? ass' -0j!30 FAX NUMBER yG -7 U 3 2- ?cDJPrf- ??5z V.r°• 1 SGo /u - ?L . rf i 5?+? ?ll ?i (LG , F 3773-J- 4 -0 7 IWO FAX NUMBER : y6'-7- 'a i' 3 2-- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by who is personally known to STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before a th?s T day of A.D., to me and/or or has produced as _ as ide ificati n. Signature o (owner or re resentative Notary Public my commission expires: (3revery A. FOX ' Commission # DD338456 .. Fourteen (1Zaryplat s of the preliminary plat must be submitted: Expires August 5, 2008 Ty FMn • Ymawnnu, Inc. EODJES ' The prelimi shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than I : 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES" EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES co 6 ; r 06 NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; :5 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS -J- 7 em ?SPc 9n,?4J?r PHONE NUMBER APPLICANT'S NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER O 73o FAX NUMBER : 7}a2-;t) it-/ -O 752- M313 (?V±) %7- -o-73L) FAX NUMBER 3 2- r- r 6o /v • f E . Da ? s -,.? /IJ ri (,,, Fc, 3 37,V - -4-U FAX NUMBER : -(G -7 -o L 3 -2- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by who is personally known to STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me thls,2 of _? day A.D.,to me and/or me or has produced as ide ificati n. L Signature o (owner or re resentative Notary Public my commission expires: POX Gregory Commission # D0338456 Fourteen (14) c pies of the preliminary plat must be submitted: ?a . Expires August 5, 2008 BaWWTroyfdn-y,suwnu,lnc.p0p-.?8S7019 The prelimi ary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information! NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; C----- _. u IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; ] PROPOSED STREET NAMES; Ci f c NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; -_? R? .6 z Z PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME n1/_? ? ?J? / ?-• C ADDRESS (e a` 635 c (p 57 k379;_' &:-!5P4-1 Ajgbr PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER O 7!3,> FAX NUMBER r2,?'?o ?O 5•2- M3L3 L? ?wPK r- L-t,C- / 1 ?136o ti. IAA re- a A?F Cam- ??. 33 ass - %-it -0-730 FAX NUMBER y67 "-0 732- T061*r-t- S -EAS-?_- V . P. X360 t--)- -Ff . i4to rzi Cc,-j. FL 337S-J-- -4-0 FAX NUMBER : YG 7 "0 ??3 Z I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by ik.in ?. \ s z who is personally known to ignature of'owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me,,th?s.??day of ..) ?\ X11 , A.D., off= to me and/or me or has produced as ide ificati n. Notary Public " I my commission expires: - •' mission # DD338456 -W '??: Com- N: Fourteen (14) /qpie-? of the preliminary plat must be submitted: Expires August 5, 2008 BadW Troy FWn • vmnnm Inc. W"54019 The prelimilfary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following informations NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; i InE a: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; 2 yx EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; 1 Inill n n C F 7 NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; n CITY OF CLEAR TER ,APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2' FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ?I 6/ ?? / L• C . ADDRESS (a 36 (D -57 &q9 - 9t:-_5PC11A-19,bE PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER O 73o FAX NUMBER (7a2 ? ?tw 7 -0 ?'J•2 18360 AU• % #}Ra-F-&0AJ AuF C(??- ?L. 33 Ss 177,2y/ %7- -0,73 c) FAX NUMBER YG-1- --0 ? 3 Z- ?c?Pr-t- ?fo0 N rf /?a rr s ?N ?}U ?i ecs? FL 3 773- -- -o-47O FAX NUMBER : y4; -7- "° X3'2_ I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS representations made in this application Sworn to and subscribed before a th?s r day of are true and accurate to the best of my ?,? , A.D., OW'j to me and/or knowledge. by fk,. n ?. s x o-j z who is personally known to me or has produced as ide ificati n. L /Signature o owner or re resentative Notary Public my commission expires: .`? .4 ' t ,- Commission # 60338456 s of the preliminary plat must be submitted: Expires August 5, 2008 Fourteen (1Z EOpJES7019 Bd+d?d Troy Fain • pqursna. Inc. aryplat The prelimi shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; V IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; A `LP LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; p ? `. n PROPOSED STREET NAMES; C--C) 5 NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; ?J C PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ???rnI S C/ ADDRESS (D0? 1 (1?3J (D -57 k379Y j?SPCIgAjgbr PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER (2? Yr+? - O 3v FAX NUMBER : ?a2) Yr'o -0 X32 M3L3 C? ?wPK?.,r- L - L,C ?77) 7- -0 -73 0 FAX NUMBER YG 1- 3 2r 1 S6o ti • rE . rr , s?N f-}v Cc,-, FL 377,r-i- -4-0 FAX NUMBER : YC -7- -p -7- 3 2- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by ?h who is personally known to ignature of owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this, 7' day of A.D., " to me and/or me or has produced as iden ificati n. Notary Public • my commission expires: ' ;: Commission # DD338456 Fourteen (14) /cpies of the preliminary plat must be submitted: Expires August 5, 2008 ' . BordW Troy Fraln • Ynunnu. Irw. ppp-0?T019 The prelimi;fary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1 t 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following infonration: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED c NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; _ IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; 4..+• CV .. ;1c 1 EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; O CR PROPOSED STREET NAMES; LJ v NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; Z i CITY OF CLEARTER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2°d FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ??r1 L= ADDRESS (oa2q 6,36 (p -57 j6nv sPc C PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER (??? - O 3y FAX NUMBER M 313 (??..? ? w Pk?,.? r- [ _ L • C IR60 /U• 1::? . /-{4rCazSOAt /}JF (2LLJ u=L. 33?Ss (7 %-?L -0-730 FAX NUMBER ?32.. 1 SGO t J- i ?E . lia r r s ?? Air, ?Fc,3 375'5- 1 - -4-0770 FAX NUMBER : L(C; -;x 'd ?1-3 2- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by who is personally known to STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me th? T day of A.D., !AVO to me and/or as or has produced as ide ificati n. L Signature o owner or re resentative Notary Public my commission expires: Grevery A. FOX .`? Commission # DD338456 Fourteen (14) c . pies of the preliminary plat must be submitted: = Expires August 5, 2008 • haursnu Inc EOaJl670/9 • ? i,? 0.4w Troy Fain The prelimi ary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; =cn NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; ?LILJ co _ Cain 6 EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; ` PROPOSED STREET NAMES; . Z? te NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; r ' a PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME 6 C . ADDRESS (D?-I (03? (D -57 em &:-SP4.19n4<}br PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ( 2?? 9Y. -7 - 0 13c> FAX NUMBER `l& 7 _p -752- M3 6 Prc&-,j r- [c IR60 /U. #A re- "OAJ /?yF Cc?- FL. 33?55? a7- -O.7 30 FAX NUMBER c167 -c) -f 32.. 9b.&rt- SiSA5,-2-- v.P. 1860 N• rf . . ter s?? /?Jrti (c,?, FL, 337r. ,n FAX NUMBER : Lit -7- 'p 7-3 2- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by who is personally known to ignature of owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before me this, T day of -) ?-. , A.D., Ar' to me and/or me or has produced as ide ificati n. Notary Public / my commission expires: Commission # DD338456 Fourteen (14) /qpies of the preliminary plat mast be submitted: Expires August 5, 2008 .. - - .. .. irl..Bdrdd Troy Fain • Ysusna, Inc. lOp.3E5'7019 The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following informations NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; -` U} , IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; 'rv# LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; Ln ., o N } 4 EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; O , > PROPOSED STREET NAMES; ---? NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; ? ?? PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS SPc•9n,?}?r PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER (2?? - O 3c? FAX NUMBER -0 M3L3 C??wPHr- c_?.c / 1 f•3 bo A). f l 22 cso.?t ?4uF C c -'d- 11?(-. 3 37ss-- ( ate) `Vit --0 30 FAXNUMBER : y6? --O }32.. Tob Qr-t- !S V.P. 1S6a N rf Vgc- (c j 1=C 377,r 'n ?70 I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all FAX NUMBER : I-el; -7- -y -?' 3 2 representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by ?i7 ?s who is personally known to STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Swom to and subscribed before me th?s, T day of , A.D., to me and/or me or, has produced as ide ificati n. owner or Notary Public / my commission expires: - Commission # DD338456 - Fourteen (14) /cpies of the preliminary plat must be submitted: Expires August 5, 2008 .. .... . . . . . . . .. • .. BaWW Troy FNn • krousna. Inc. E00•JE6.7019 The prelimioary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; °- IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; u-? LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; 7 ' EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; PROPOSED STREET NAMES; L NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; c? f a? CITY OF CLEAR TER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2nd FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME ?`?? ADDRESS (e?-1 (o 3J (D -5 ?l?Y Spc?9n?9?r PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER (2?? 2'? 71 - O 3V FAX NUMBER : - ( Z-Ai) -0 IS60 /U. f{Are-a SO.J 4uF CL,,d. rC. 2375-s-- 4k -0,730 FAX NUMBER /o2yZ> YG u 3 Z. ?101J /V f /- .rr SAN ?Jrtii ?C.? FC. 337S-r- 10 FAX NUMBER : Lff- -7x 'a -?= 3 -2- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by fkn„ n ?. s , o,.j 2, who is personally known to owner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before a th?s T day of A.D., to me and/or me or has produced as idea ifcati n. Notary Public / my commission expires: t ': Commission # DD338456 Expires August 5, 2008 Fourteen (14) /cpies of the preliminary plat must be submitted;{{.tt • Munn, Inc. SOD, -7019 BddW Troy Fain 45 The prelimitary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; -' IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; C? EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; jCl1 c•.-- C.! PROPOSED STREET NAMES; U z NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; r'--1r- --- ? CITY OF CLEARTER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2°d FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME /??nI ? !' J? // ?-• C . ADDRESS (D 1 &36 (p -57 ?7Gli' Y SPc ?9n,1?}J?T PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER ?i2f? - 0 7 3y FAX NUMBER : (?a2 ? to _0 7,5;2- C- 1860 C- 1860 AJ. #i422-"O U A(1F CL,-) ??. 3375-s- ????? v -0 -73 C) FAX NUMBER C14 yG -p 3 Z 29b-4 ?r-f- ?s z S z V. P. 18 GO N • r£ . ,k.r-r- S 6ac- Cca., FL. 337srs- 4-0770 FAX NUMBER : Yc -7- 'C) 3 Z- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. by Re0at. \- S->- --s z, who is personally known to STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before a th?s T day of A.D., to me and/or as or has produced as ide ificati n. L Signature o owner or 7xkesentative Notary Public my commission expires: Gregory A. FalIx .1 t Commission # DD338456 Fourteen (1Zaryplat s of the preliminary plat must be submitted: Expires August 5, 2008 ... ??? B,,dTroyF*.VaLana,Inc Wolms-? 9 The prelimi shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following informations NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; .........,._.. r- ..-...... ........ ..-.-, U l T;,,? NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; n . IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT ?. Ln r: . ; LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; 'T EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; ?IJL!' d „C.i a,,• PROPOSED STREET NAMES; z NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; . CITY OF CLEARTER APPLICATION FOR PLAT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2°d FLOOR PHONE (727)-562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME rl C/ / ?-• C . ADDRESS 6,q ? 3J 6 -57 e g - ? sPC. A4QJ>T PHONE NUMBER APPLICANTS NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER AGENT NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER "727- - D 7!3 0 FAX NUMBER ("Za2?? o ? -0 .7 3;2- M3L3 C???wPK??-- [_L.C l ?/ a -O -7 3 D FAX NUMBER Cj0gA y6 U 3 Z 7 - 7 1 SGO ti. i l?cr r s ?N ?}J k, Fc-, 3 3.73-.r- ,0 FAX NUMBER : YC? -7- -0 7? 3 -2-- 1, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, by who is personally known to ignature ofowner or STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed before r this, '7 day of A.D.,S= to me and/or me or has produced as idea ifcati n. Notary Public . I / my commission expires: ';: Commission # DD338456 Fourteen (14) /pies of the preliminar y plat must be submitted: %a /.Expires August 5, 2008 • Minna Vnc EOp-065 7019 '7 ... BoW Troy F.M. The prelimiyfary plat shall be prepared by a surveyor, architect, landscape architect or engineer drawn to a scale not smaller than 1: 100 and shall not exceed 24" X 36" and include the following information: NORTH ARROW, SCALE AND DATE; TITLE UNDER WHICH THE PROPOSED PLAT IS TO BE RECORDED; NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE PERSON PREPARING THE PLAT; _.._,_. IDENTIFICATION CLEARLY STATING THAT THE DRAWING IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT; i1? 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH U.S. SURVEY SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE LINES; N e EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS; co 4 j PROPOSED STREET NAMES; + NAMES, APPROPRIATELY POSITIONED, OF ADJOINING PLATS; '? 50 •• acarwater v Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $1,205.00 •• CASE #: L--I•?dt-US - y I U (QJ DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION O R (G I N A L Comprehensive Infill Project (Revised 04-05-05) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: Hess Properties II MAILING ADDRESS: 64 Bay Esplanade. Clearwater. FL 33767 PHONE NUMBER: 727-463-4377 FAX NUMBER: PROPERTY OWNER(S): Hess Properties 11 Go Stephen Hess (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: Keith E. Zavac. P.E.. RLA MAILING ADDRESS: 701 Enterprise Road. Ste 404. Safety Harbor. FL 34695 PHONE NUMBER: 727-793-9888 FAX NUMBER: 727-793-9855 CELL NUMBER: E-MAIL ADDRESS: keithOkeithzavac.com B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of subject site: 64 Bay Esplanade, 566 Bay Esplanade LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Attached (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: See Attachment A Jill 2W5 PARCEL SIZE: Aclci ci.f. - (acres, squ re feet) ` P VNING & DL i QPiJrr? , , yl,? cipt O- Cit. .AF?'VAI E R PROPOSED USE(S), SIZE(S) AND VALUE OF PROJECT: 21 condominium units (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): See Attachment B Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) g• o* ORIGINAL DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES _ NO x (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) C. PROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) ? SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. I 1. WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. See Attachment C 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof- See Attachment C 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. 2M5 See Attachment C ?a.?iIVNI?VL`- fs '+ 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment C 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. See Attachment C O 1. Provide complete responses to the ten (10) COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA (as applicable) -Explain how each criteria is achieved in detail: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. See Attachment D 040 N ORIGINAL Z The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project or residential infill project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) See Attachment D 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D 4. The uses or mix of use within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. See Attachment D 5. Suitable sites for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. See Attachment D & The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. See Attachment D 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. See Attachment D 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guideli es-inivjsion 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). Use separate sheets as necessary. ro See Attachment D p _?.'I7 lli' l,l_LyTI11ii1UJ -..-i_t RIGINAL E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm , Drainage Design Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that im addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exeml to this requirement If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; - Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent streets and municipal storm systems; - Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. - Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. ? COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable ? Acknowledgement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) "23 SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; ? TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, ncluding drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; ;,LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to lid the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; GRADING PLAN, as applicable; ? PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ? COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) u SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24"x 36°): All dimensions; Ll North arrow; 0 Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; JUL 0 9 1 2005 Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; j;,?l?;ltjl?f? g lit 4 l=LC!r'?t??ly 1 Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; CT(Q All required setbacks; 4--r-- T All existing and proposed points of access; All required sight triangles; Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Location of all public and private easements; Location of all street rights-0f--way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #7011; Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsee storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. ?IJ SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ,@_/REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist°, of all trees 8° DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) ? LANDSCAPE PLAN: - All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; - Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; - Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. ? REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8'h X 11) (color rendering if possible); ? IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. JUL 0 12005 SVCJ 1. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infill Project. ? BUILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; ? REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'h X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8'%X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: • Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. • Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. • Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. X Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineerid'a° €p8rtrMbAt-( -ZZ),,5622 4 5R. , JUL 0 1 2005 L. SIGNATURE:" AIVRI}'iVG T; --- ?? I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTI7'OF PINELL,V r _ application are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge and Swom to and subscribed before me this day of authorize City representatives to visit and photograph the property A.D. 20 to me and/or by described in this application. who is personally known has produced as identification. Signature of property owner or representative Notary public, My commission expires: .• 00 ORIGINAL Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. 2 Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. x Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Adr Department at (727) 562-4750. I.1L.9L 0 12005 L. SIGNATURE: I, the undersigned, acknowledge that all representations made in this application are triie ahd' accutate'to tf e-be! knowledge and authorize City epresentatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application. Signature of property owner or representative STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn t and subsc_&ed before me this 1(Q_ day of Ur1Q A.D. 20 OS to me and/or by `J T ts0b , who is personally known has produced lro as identification. i?•.:,vL? 0fbmy --• LYDIA RODRIGUEZ v''•.,, Nota public, My commission expires: (.?OJ '? X005 _ 's Notary Public - State of Florida My Comm-sion Expieg Nov 7, 2005 Commission S DO 070740 ?n°F„•`' Bonded By National Notary Assn. AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: when T, 14,ss (Names of II property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): ` Stephen Hess Cs (CLIP)ade Sls7?r9 ?Qlf ?sl??ailQ? 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) See attachment E for list of requests 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: Keith E. Zayac, P.E., RLA •• •0 ORIGINAL as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act on the above described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order to process this application and the owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (Ihnre), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true and rect. Property 06ner Property Owner Property Owner Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, Bef re me the undersigned, an officer duly commissioned b the laws oft State of Florida, on this qrE , 2006 personally appeared 6-4 (?ern T. 1C4't Deposes and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she signed. My Commission Expires: 6v `7t ;100,5 ;:Y"'w, LYDIA RODRIGUEZ Notary Public - State of Florida ' My Commission Expires Nov 7, 2005 . Commissions DD 070740 Bonded By National Notary Assn. 16 dE who having been first duly sworn 0 4- (?p Notary Public S:IPlanning Departmentl4pplication Formsldevelopment reviewlflexible development comprehensive infill application 2005.doc rf==1 lW , ?? .>l V_ 0 12005 •. ATTACHMENT A PARCEL NUMBERS 05/29/15/54756/079/0180 05/29/15/54756/079/0020 00 ORIGINAL nrl 1, , JU? 0 '12005 ' J g! 0• ATTACHMENT B DESCRIPTION OF REQUESTS • Increase in height from 35 ft to 52 ft from FEMA to midpoint of roof. ORIGINAL l 'r JU 0 l 2005 I; f "tA 00 •• ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT C GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The project will set a positive standard for the neighborhood, while maintaining the harmony of scale and character of the adjacent properties. The proposed project will maintain the harmony of Clearwater Beach with the proposed Mediterranean architectural theme, upgraded architectural facades and maintain the small-scale multi-family character of the neighborhood. The project does not deviate from the permitted uses in the Tourist Zoning District with the proposed 21 condominium units. The character of the project is an upscale condominium development with upgraded architectural finishes and textures. The project is in character with the scale, bulk, coverage and density of the three previously approved Napenthe, LaRisa I and LaRisa II projects 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. The proposed development is consistent with the existing surrounding and proposed land uses. The project will be consistent with the re-development of other properties on Bay Esplanade, and set a positive example for the redevelopment of the remaining properties to the north and south when appropriate. The value of the abutting properties will not be compromised, and will likely be enhanced by the development of the project. 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The 21 unit multi-family project is solely residential in nature, and replaces the existing motel developments. There are no proposed uses other than residential that will have a detrimental effect on the health of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion The parking is designed within a fully within a parking garage and use only one 24-foot wide driveway. There is no proposed on street parking associated with the project. The proposed 33 parking spaces exceed the required parking spaces required by code. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. .,J - ?_ gi 00 ORIGINAL The surrounding parcels along Bay Esplanade are primarily multi-family apartment developments. The existing character consists of older buildings with no noticeable architectural style. The proposed project will significantly enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity by implementing a Mission Spanish flavor suggested by City code. 6 The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts. The project minimizes the acoustic and olfactory impacts of the project by planting landscape buffers and the use of a parking garage with no exterior parking. The project only contains 21 residential units, and will not include any commercial or other businesses. .• 00 ORIGINAL ATTACHMENT D RESPONSES TO COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CRITERIA 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity, and development standards. The applicant is only requesting an increase in height from 35'-0" to 52 feet. The property is an existing motel property with a front minimum width of 107.13 ft. The building width is designed to accommodate a 24 ft wide driveway, 33 19-ft parking spaces and associated stairs and trash room. The remaining open space, which exceeds code minimum, is heavily landscaped with minimal grass to offset the requested setback deviations. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of butting properties. Both the appearance and fair market value of this and surrounding properties will be enhanced by the development of this project. The adjacent properties are older apartments and multi-family structures. The construction of a new condominium building will enhance and promote the redevelopment efforts of these abutting properties, as well as increase the fair market value. The anticipated sale costs of each unit are well in excess of $600,000, which will increase the property values of the neighborhood. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. The proposed request for condominiums is consistent with both the existing zoning and future land use of the subject property and adjoining parcels. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. The proposed use of the property is consistent with adjacent land uses as multi- family. The recently approved developments near this project along with the existing uses of the surrounding land uses are generally multi-family. The use is consistent with the City tourist zoning designation and County Future Land Use designation 5. Suitable site for development or redevelopment of the uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are not otherwise available in the City of Clearwater. 00 0ORIGINAL The owner is committed to develop their property to its best and highest use that is compatible with recently approved developments in the area. This development is possible since the property is currently owned by the developer and land costs due to other approved projects make the development impractical in other areas. 6. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The immediate vicinity consists of older multi-family structures, several of which will be tom down to construct recently approved projects. The development of this project will upgrade the surrounding building appearances by using Mediterranean themed architecture, as well as a fully landscaped property with palm trees and shrubs. The project also eliminates perpendicular parking from the public road, which is still currently in use on the immediately adjacent properties. 7. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The proposed investment made in the property by removal of older buildings and replacing with new construction will benefit the immediate area aesthetically, increase the property values of adjacent property, stimulate the redevelopment of adjacent property, and provide a viable to increase the tax base of the City. The aesthetic character of the community will also be enhanced by the architecture of the building with fully landscaped grounds. The landscaping includes a combination of palms, hedges and shrubs, which fully encompass the property. 8. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to the community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. Flexibility in regard to a height increase is requested for this project. The property is currently owned by the applicant and is working with their existing property constraints to create a project that fits the property and is consistent with other recently approved projects within the area. The existing immediate vicinity currently utilizes backout parking within the right of way, which severely limits the capacity of the existing roadway. The proposed project proposes to take the parking and move it all into an enclosed parking garage under the living units. This will enhance the capacity of the JUL tiu 0 J 2005 L. iJE- ?..?1'`IVI;:.I •,) , •`? 00 90 ORIGINAL existing roadway and eliminate the visual degradation of the area by exterior parking. The landscaping in the existing vicinity is very limited and is severely stressed in many cases. This property has proposed landscaping in all open space areas except for the required sodded stormwater treatment ponds. The landscaping includes taller palm trees, intermediate shrubs and lower groundcover that surrounds the building and mitigates for the height flexibility. The building height is offset by the stepped faVade of the building along with the enhanced Spanish Mission theme. The current architecture of the vicinity is dated without the City preferred theme. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on- street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. There will be no on-street parking to accommodate the development. All required parking per standard code would be provided on-site. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable) The "Old Florida" district is an area of transition between resorts and low intensity. The mix of uses favor residential rather than retail. Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing buildings and should be low to mid-rise. Lack of parking hinders revitalization of existing improvements particularly on Bay Esplanade. The proposed building consists of a low-density four unit multi-family project and does not include any retail uses. The density of the project is less than required by the Tourist district and with only 21 units is below several of the existing apartment developments in the surrounding area. The building being 52 ft above FEMA to midroof would generally be considered as a mid-rise building consistent with other recently approved projects which have set a standard of development. The project includes all required parking on-site and within the building to revitalize the integrity and capacity of Bay Esplanade. The architecture of the building is generally Spanish Mission in nature, which is consistent with the remainder of the tourist district with significant undulating architectural features. The architecture is enhanced by the proposed palm trees, which soften the corners of the building and provide a vegetative scale to the structure. The colors of the building are consistent with the recently approved projects along the beach and do not include any wild or obtrusive colors. JUL 0 12005 U"VL?4Jf vt ur?'s5? JV 1 Hess Condominiums Stormwater Calculations EXISTING CONDITIONS: Description Area ft2 x C= YCA pavement 5,256 0.98 5,150.9 building 3,486 0.98 3,416.3 pond 0 1.00 - open area 15,517 0.20 3,103.4 PROPOSED CONDITIONS: Description Area RZ X C= pavement 1,278 0.98 1,252.4 building 14,657 0.98 14,363.9 pond 2,483 1.00 2,483.0 open area 5,841 0.20 1,168.2 HISTORIC PEAK DISCHARGE: C9m = 0.48 Cpw = 0.79 ORIGINAL JUL 0 12005 `t='1Ei..1P!`?I? ,`. t = 10 mins A = 0.550 acs i = 8.5 Whr C = 0.48 Q = CiA = 2.2 Cfs 25 YEAR STORM D I P Rainfall Duration Intensity (in/hr) Peak Run-Off Min Sec FDOT Zone VI Q = CiA (c(s) 10 600 8.5 3.76 15 900 7.3 3.23 20 1200 6.5 2.88 30 1800 5.4 2.39 40 2400 4.6 2.03 50 3000 4.0 1.77 60 3600 3.6 1.59 90 5400 2.8 1.24 S R REQUIRED STORAGE Storm Release (CO DxP(ct) DxH(cf) S-R 2,256 1,349 906 2,906 2,024 882 3,450 2,699 751 4,299 4,048 251 4,883 5,398 -515 5,308 6,747 -1,439 5,732 8,097 -2,364 6,688 12,145 -5,457 Sta_ae-Stora-ae-Perimeter Project Name: Hess Condominiums Project Number. Designer: kez Date: [ .- -- st22t2oc Comments: Area @ Top of Bank(TOB): Area @ Design High Water(DHW): @ Design Low Water(DLW): fa @ Bottom/Normal Water Level(BOT/NWL): STAGE AREA VOLUME (ft) (fe) (ft) 4.00 267.5 0.0 4.03 311.9 7.5 4.05 356.2 16.2 4.08 400.5 26.1 4.10 444.8 37.0 4.13 489.1 49.2 4.16 533.4 62.5 4.18 577.7 76.9 4.21 622.1 92.5 4.23 666.4 109.3 4.26 710.7 127.2 29 755.0 146.2 .31 4 799.3 166.4 .34 843.6 187.8 4 .36 887.9 210.3 4.39 932.3 234.0 4.42 976.6 258.8 4.44 1,020.9 284.7 4.47 1,065.2 311.9 4.49 1,109.5 340.1 4.52 1,153.8 369.6 4.55 1,198.2 400.1 4.57 1,242.5 431.9 4.60 1,286.8 464.7 4.62 1,331.1 498.8 ORIGINAL 2,483.3 Elevation: 1,886.7 Elevation: 1,886.7 Elevation: 267.5 Elevation: STAGE AREA (ft) (f) 4.65 1,375.4 4.68 1,419.7 4.70 1,464.0 4.73 1,508.4 4.75 1,552.7 4.78 1,597.0 4.81 1,641.3 4.83 1,685.6 4.86 1,729.9 4.88 1,774.2 4.91 1,818.6 4.94 1,862.9 4.96 1,907.2 4.99 1,951.5 5.01 1,995.8 5.04 2,040.1 5.07 2,084.4 5.09 2,128.8 5.12 2,173.1 5.14 2,217.4 5.17 2,261.7 5.20 2,306.0 5.22 2,350.3 5.25 2,394.7 5.27 2,439.0 5.30 2,483.3 (ft) ( fta 5.30 Volume: 1,788 4.95 Volume: 1,023 4,95 Volume: 1,023 4.00 Volume: 0 VOLUME TREATMENT (ft') VOLUME: 1,023 fta 534.0 570.3 ATTENUATION 607.8 VOLUME:O fta 646.4 686.2 _ 727.2 769.3 812.5 856.9 - 902.5 949.2 y I 997.0 r 1S } 1 1,046.0 '?` . O -J 1,096.2 1,147.5 1,200.0 _.- 1,253.6 1,308.4 1,364.3 1,421.4 1,479.6 1,539.0 1,599.5 1,661.2 1,724.0 1,788.0 Sheet2 Weir Calculation Q=3WH"1.5 CFS Q post 3.76 Q pre 2.2 Q dis 1.66 ft H 0.35 rim elevation - weir elevation W=Q/3H^1.5 ft in W= 2.511315 30.13579 Weir width = 30.13579 inches wide ORIGINAL ?la? 0 ? 2405 Page 1 Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 05/29/15/54756/079/01* Page 2 of 4 05 1 29 / 15 / 54750 / 079 / 0180 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:34:22 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales HESS PROPERTIES II LLC OBK; 14266 OPG: 0507 305 WINDWARD IS CLEARWATER FL 33767 EV'AC; A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 566 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract; 260.02 l f 2002 2003 sa es rom - : 541,100 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 4 /2,005 14,266/ 507 495,100 (0) I 1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 0000: Book Pgs - 0 10 0/ 0 0 ( ? 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 438,200 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 438,200 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem; 0 Taxable: 438,200 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District; CW Seawall; Frontage: Clearwater 'View; 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 10,065.19 1) 107 x 110 45. 00 11,770. 00 S Special Tax 00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 10, 065.19 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be ; 10, 065.19 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 79, LOTS 18 & 19 (PER Description PLAT BK 20 PO 27) LESS R/W FOR CLEARWATER ST Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b= l &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=05/29/l 5/5475... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr* Information: 05/29/15/54756/079/01 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 08 / 29 / 15 / 54750 079 / 0180 :01 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:34:21 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use, 220 Land Use; 08 Living Units; 4 Imp Type; Duplex/Triplex Prop Address; 566 BAY ESPLANADE S?ruc-tural E1em?n?s Foundation Continuous Wall Quality Average Floor System Slab on Grade Year Built 11950 Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reclad Effective Age 15 Roof Frame Flat-Shed Heating Rvrse Cycle/Wall Unt Roof Cover B U Tar&Gravel/Othr Cooling None Fixtures 12 # Stories 1.0 Other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Crpt/Vnyl/SftWd/Terr Functional Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub Areas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i. 00 3, 092 7) . 00 0 2) Utility .25 63 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) 00 0 6) .00 0 12) . 00 0 RE:!idE:n-tial Extra Fie.t-turE3S Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIO/DECK 430sf 3. 00 430 1,290 520 1,980 2) FIREPLACE 51000. 00 1 51000 21000 1'950 3) PATIO/DECK i0x28 3. 00 280 840 340 1,980 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 2,860 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-ser3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=05/29/15/5475... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr Information: 05/29/15/54756/079/0 Page 2 of 4 5 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 079 / 0020 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:35:16 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales BAY ESPLANADE PROPERTIES LLC OBK: 14266 OPG: 0509 64 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767-1608 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 64 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 l f 2002 - 2003 rom : sa es 0 Sale Date OR Bock/Page Price ([dual/Unq) Vac/Imp Plat Information 4 12,005 14,2661 509 1,750,000 (Q) I 1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 7 11,998 10,15812,368 800,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 8 11,995 9108811,680 740,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 5 11,987 6,50411,758 420,000 (Q) I 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS .Just/Market: 690,000 Homestead: YES Ownership % 1.000 SAUE-OUR-HOMES CAP Govt Exem: NO Use '2: .220 Assessed/Cap: 675,200 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 650,200 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 14,934.70 1) 114 x 110 45. 00 12,540. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 15, 274.65 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be : 15, 848.89 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 79, THAT PART OF LOT Description 2 LYINO H OF REU LAYOUT OF CLEARWATER ST & LOT 3 Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=05/29/15/5475... 7/6/2005 Pinellas County Property Appr* Information: 05/29/15/54756/079/0 Page 3 of 4 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 05 l 29 / 15 / 54750 I 079 0020 01 06-Jul-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 08:35:16 Commercial Card 01 of 1 Improvement Type; Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address; 64 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use; 313 Land Use, 39 STrucTura IL Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Clover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 16 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 48 Bath Tile Floor and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,951 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 S1113 Ar r a s Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 7, 067 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 1, 566 8) . 00 0 3) Utility .40 35 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) . 00 0 6) .00 0 12) . 00 0 C omm ?r c i a l E x? r a F e a-t ur e s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCO Year 1) PATIO/DECK 530SF 3. 00 530 1,590 670 1,981 2) POOL 924 SF 25,000.00 1 25,000 10,500 11981 3) SHUFBOCT 312 SF 1.000. 00 1 11000 1,000 999 4) ASPHALT 5000 1.50 5,000 7,500 7,500 999 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE; 19,670 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &r=&s=1 &u=0&p=05/29/15/5475... 7/6/2005 i l?,?prrsjr IL?, PLANNING DEPARTMENT • CITY OF C LEARWATE R POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 February 21, 2007 Mr. Stephen Hess 901 N. Hercules Avenue Suite D Clearwater, FL 33765 RE: FLD2005-07065 - 64 and 566 Bay Esplanade Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Hess: On February 20, 2007, the Community Development Board (CDB) APPROVED your request to extend the time frame for the Development Order for the above referenced case. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit to construct the site improvements on your parcel at 64 and 566 Bay Esplanade shall be submitted by March 20, 2008. All required certificates of occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the building permit. Time frames do not change with successive owners. Should you be unable to apply for a building permit to construct the improvements approved under the above referenced case, you will need to re-apply for development approval in accordance with the requirements of the Community Development Code. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III at 727-562-4504. Sincerely, Michael De9,P Planning Director S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished ApplicationsTay Esplanade 064 & 566 Hess (T) - ApprovedlBay Esplanade 064 & 566 CDB Time Extension Development Order 2.21.07.doc FRANK HIBBARD, MAYOR JOHN DORAN, COUNCILMEMBER J.B. JOHNSON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" Clearwater Fax Cover Memo CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, 2ND FLOOR CLEARWATER, FL 33756 (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 TO: DATE: 7_/l S o-7 FAX: ti? 3 - A-7 II TELEPHONE: 3 - 4 3-1 7 FROM: Wayne M. Wells TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4504 SUBJECT: FL17 2-0 d S 0 7_1D bar . (0 A- 4 StO to LZ. CIAA le- NUMBER OF SHEETS (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): 3 i Feb. 15 2007 10:26AM YOUR LOGO YOUR FAX NO. 7275624865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 94434799 Feb.15 10:25AM 01'09 SND 03 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY USING '+' OR FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX (435-7329). Wells, Wayne From: Wells, Wayne Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:19 AM To: Ed Hooper (E-mail); Joe Burdette (E-mail) Subject: FLD2005-07065, 64 and 566 Bay Esplanade Ed/Joe - This is being sent to you as a courtesy, as both of you were copied on a letter to us by Stephen Hess requesting a time extension for the above case. I am faxing the Staff Report to Mr. Hess. Attached is the Staff Report for the above referenced case (time extension). This case will be heard by the CDB on February 20, 2007, at 1:00 pm at City Hall (being placed on the Consent portion of the CDB agenda). Wayne Nii-HI Bay Esplanade 064 & 566 - Time... •ES?spina Corporate Office: 901 N. Hercules Ave. • centers Ste. D, Clearwater, FL 33765 ORIGINAL RECEIVED JAN 24 2007 Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 S. Myrtle Ave Clearwater, Florida 33758 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Re: Community Development Board Request For Time Extension Laguna on Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07065 Mr. Delk Please accept this as our request to be placed on the February Community Development Board Agenda to request a 1-year extension to the above referenced development order. We understand that this is our second extension request and, as such, must be approved by the Community Development Board at its next meeting. The recent economic downturn coupled with rising construction costs have made it difficult to market our proposed condominiums. Lenders are now demanding pre-sales in excess of 66% of the units to be built in order to fund our project and we have not been able to meet the requirement with the current market conditions which are, unfortunately, out of our control. The recent road construction on Mandalay Avenue has also hampered our sales efforts, but we understand that work will be completed soon. We thank you for your assistance in this request and look forward to improving market conditions and getting our project underway. Sincerely A??y _AoA47 Cc; Joe Burdette Ed Hooper O 1103 9TH AVE. W. O 919 PARSONS AVE. S. O 901 N. HERCULES AVE., STE A 13 1.519 LAKELAND HILLS BLVD. O 5036 TROUBLE CREEK ROAD BRADENTON, FL 34205 BRANDON. FL 33511 CLEARWATER, FL 33765 LAKELAND, FL 33805 NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34652 (941) 752-4377 (813) 571-0888 (727) 443-4377 (863) 688-3388 (727) 848-9144 O 6129 PARK BLVD. O 5001 4TH ST. N. O 2516 W. WATERS AVE. O 4809 E. BUSCH BLVD., STE 107 PINELLAS PARK, FL 33781 ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33703 TAMPA, FL 33614 TEMPLE TERRACE, FL 33617 (727) 548-4377 (727) 898-8689 (813) 265-4377 (813) 988-1003 _ r ?y4TER, LOW; RANGE PLANNING Drvr:LOPMENi- Ri-'U.'w August 2, 2006 Mr. Steven Hess C/o Mr. Ed Hooper P.O. Box 4268 Clearwater, Florida 33758 • LI CITY OF C LEARWATE R PLANNING DEPARTMENT Posr Orru:b: Box 4748, Cu.:A wA'rr:ii, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAI. Si:wicrs I3uu.nrNC, 100 Soui'ii Mv'in' r: Avl:.vr;t:, CLBARWATFR, FLORIDA 33756 'I'ELITHONI? (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2005-07065 - 64 and 566 Bay Esplanade Time Extension Development Order Dear Mr. Hess: On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above referenced Flexible Development application to permit 21 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height from 35 feet to 52 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code, along with a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 6-109 of the Community Development Code. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit must be initiated within one year from the date of CDB approval (September 20, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On July 28, 2006, you submitted a request for a one-year time extension to initiate a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. Your letter cited problems with construction pre-sales and financing, increased construction costs necessitating architectural redesigns of the interior, and a change in architects. Since the approval of this project, amendments have been made to the Community Development Code that have a significant effect on the project. Those amendments are as follows: ? Section 6-109.B of the Community Development Code was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to attached dwelling unit density; Fk%NK I111MARU, ;\tAWN Jc?n:? Dcrnn,?, COI N ai.MI.NIhI]' H m r I I:?>ni:rcc?• Cot Ncai.v11:ml l; Bii -i.J()vtir,\• CcWN(Ji \11;\M IT ® (:ua.r? ;\. PI:I CUC ?cai. nt>ucer F'.,\II'H AMI:.\ I ANI) Arriwm!\rivr: Acric N I?•\IP1.0) itr;., August 2, 2006 • Hess - Page 2 of 2 ? The parking requirement for attached dwellings has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was approved with 33 parking spaces for 21 attached dwelling units, a rate of 1.57 parking spaces per dwelling unit; ? The allowable parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42-inches. The project approved by the CDB included a parapet height of 11 feet; ? The definition of "Height, building or structure" has been amended so that only elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures are permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height within the district. As approved, the project included appurtenances (architectural embellishments) not consistent with the above definition that projected 19 feet above the roof deck; and ? The "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area plan has been revised such that it requires a 6.8-foot building stepback along the south facade of the building at a height of 35 feet. As approved, the project did not incorporate any stepback at this height. In considering the above changes to the Code, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, I APPROVE a six-month time extension of the original Development Order to March 20, 2007, to initiate an application for a building permit to construct those improvements on your parcel of land at 64 and 566 Bay Esplanade as previously approved by the Community Development Board with same conditions of approval attached. In the event you are unable to proceed with the project by submitting for the building permit, the CDB may approve one additional extension of time to initiate a building permit application. Such an extension shall not exceed one year, shall be for the project originally approved (or as approved through the Minor Revision process) and shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing. The CDB must receive the request for this extension within the time frame granted by the Planning Director (period of validity after the original extension approved by the Planning Director, which means that any time extension request must be submitted with sufficient lead time to be placed on the CDB agenda that precedes the above expiration date). Good causes may include, but are not limited to, an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like. The CDB may also consider these same Code amendments enumerated above, whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are additional pending or approved Code amendments that would further significantly affect the project. Please be aware that the issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.teff:L&Myclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director S.• (Planning Department)C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications IBay Esplanade 064 & 566 - Hess (T) - Approved (Bay Esplanade 064 & 566 - Time Extension Development Order 08-02-06.doc Mr. Michael Delk Planning Director City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida, 33756 Re: Laguna On Bay Esplanade - FLD2005-07065 Dear Mr. Delk Please accept this letter as our request for a 1-year extension for the above referenced Development Order for the Laguna On Bay Esplanade on Clearwater Beach. This request is based on the land development code section 4.04 and the specific criteria for our request is as follows: 1. We are in the process of pre-sales and market conditions have been slow. Construction lenders' have increased the number of pre-sales required to fund construction loans and this has hampered us as well. 2. Increase in construction costs have forced us to redo some of our interior architectural drawings in order to keep our costs in line while still maintaining our commitment to a quality product. 3. We are also in the process of changing architects to a firm better suited for the production drawings and this as also caused us some delay. Should you require any additional information, please contact me and I will see that you receive whatever information you may require. Thank you for help in this matter. Steven Hess Property Owner Cc: Keith Zayac n k?gt V JL 2 8 2006 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CITY OF CLEARWATER CITY OF CLEAR ATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT I - .1 . POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 ?,, `' 1• L' l k MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 21, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: FLD2005-07065 - 64 Bay Esplanade and 566 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit 21 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height from 35 feet to 52 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive InfLll Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of eight dwelling units would otherwise be permitted under current Code) under the provisions of Section 6-109. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following finding of fact and conclusions of law and conditions. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.55 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 3. That the development proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development; 4. That the development proposal complies with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which states that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code; 5. That the subject property is currently developed with 18 overnight accommodation units at 64 Bay Esplanade and 3 overnight accommodation units at 566 Bay Esplanade; 6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 16 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 7. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with overnight accommodations and detached dwellings with heights varying between one and three stories, with the surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and detached dwellings; 8. That the height of the proposed building is 52 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 9. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property; BRIAN J. AUNGST, 1WYOR FRANK HIBBARI), VICE MAYOR E{OYI' HAb11L'1'ON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCIL:\-tE\,iBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMENIBER "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AcnON EMPLOYER" r- T 10. That the development proposal meets the requirements for a termination of status of nonconformity as per Section 6-109 to permit 13 dwelling units where eight units would otherwise be allowed at 64 Bay Esplanade; 11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3-913.A; and 12. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of Section 2-803.C. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That the existing water main within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way is upgraded to the satisfaction of the Fire Department in order to ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes, and that said upgrades are depicted on a revised Grading, Drainage & Utilities Site Plan (sheet 4 of 5) prior to the issuance of a Development Order; 2. That fire flow calculations are provided by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure adequate water supply; 3. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 5. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; 12. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 13. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 14. That the proposed gated access is eliminated or that the plans are revised to provide some means by which guests can gain access to the off-street parking area to the satisfaction of Traffic Engineering and Planning Department staff, 15. That the site plan is revised to depict the location of facilities to accommodate recyclables; and 16. That the width of the dumpster staging area is reduced to a size of approximately 7.5 feet. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by September 20, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(iDmyclearwater.com. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director CDB Meeting Date: September 20, 2005 Case Number: FLD2005-07065 Agenda Item: F.S. Owner / Applicant: Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC. Agent: Keith E. Zayac Address: 64 Bay Esplanade and 566 Bay Esplanade CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of eight dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Section 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to height from 35 feet to 52 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. EXISTING ZONING / Tourist (T) District. LAND USE: Resort Facility High (RFH) Category. PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodations (21 units). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (21 units). ADJACENT ZONING / North: Tourist (T) District - Detached dwellings. LAND USE: South: Open Space/Recreation (OSR) District - City Park. East: Institutional (I) District - Parking lot. West: Institutional (I) District - Place of Worship. CHARACTER OF THE The surrounding area is a mixture of attached dwellings, detached IMMEDIATE VICINITY: dwellings and overnight accommodation uses. ANAl.VCTR- Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.55-acre subject property, which is located at the northwest corner of Bay Esplanade and Cypress Avenue, has a zoning designation of Tourist (T) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Resort Facilities High (RFH). The property is also located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District. According to the City's records, the subject property presently consists of two separate developments: the Cavalier Motel, located at 64 Bay Esplanade, which consists of 18 overnight accommodation units within a two-story building with an accessory swimming pool and back out parking into the Bay Esplanade and Cypress Avenue rights-of-way; and a 3-unit motel, located at 566 Bay Esplanade, which Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07065 - 1 of 7 • 0 consists of one-story motel with an accessory swimming pool an back out parking into the Bay Esplanade right-of-way. The immediate vicinity is predominantly comprised of overnight accommodations and detached dwellings, which vary in height between one and three stories. It is noted that the immediate vicinity has seen one recent condominium development approval; the 37 foot high Poinsettia Place, which is located at 605 Poinsettia Avenue. Proposal: The development proposal consists of the demolition of the existing improvements on site and the construction of a 52-foot high building (as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck) containing 21 condominium units that range in size from a 1,800 square foot two-bedroom unit to a 2,933 square foot three-bedroom unit. The existing back out parking within the Bay Esplanade and Cypress Avenue rights-of-way will be removed and replaced with sod and a five-foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the property line. It is noted that no sidewalk presently exists adjacent to the subject property. The development proposal also includes the provision of a roof top swimming pool and sundeck on the west side of the building. Building Setbacks: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwellings are required to provide a front setback of 0-15 feet, a side setback of 0-10 feet, and a rear setback of 10-20 feet. The subject property consists of three front setbacks (south, east and west) and one side setback (north), and the development proposal complies with all setback requirements will the lone exception of the front (east) setback where a request has been made to reduce the required setback from 15 feet to zero feet to accommodate the dumpster staging area. Based upon the nature of the request, the reduction can be supported. Therefore, compliance with Section 2-803, with regard to setback requirements has been achieved. Off-Street Parking: Pursuant to Section 2-803, attached dwellings units require the provision of 1.5 parking spaces per unit. Therefore, the proposed 21 attached dwelling units require a total of 32 parking spaces and the development proposal includes the provision of a 33 space parking area on the ground level of the building. Based upon the above, compliance with the requirements of Section 2-803 as they pertain to off; street parking has been achieved. In addition to the above, it is noted that the ingress/egress point to the ground level parking area is proposed to be gated. However, the applicant has not proposed any means by which guests to the development can obtain access to the parking area (i.e. call box). The failure to provide any means of guest access to the off-street parking area will ultimately result in the stacking of vehicles into the Bay Esplanade right-of-way and/or the parking of vehicles in the Bay Esplanade and Cypress Avenue rights- of-way. Therefore, it is attached as a condition of approval that the proposed gated access is eliminated or that the plans are revised to provide some means by which guests can gain access to the off-street parking area to the satisfaction of Traffic Engineering and Planning Department staff. Solid Waste: The development proposal includes the provision of a trash holding area at the northeast corner of the building. A 30-foot by 15-foot concrete slab will be provided between the northeast corner of the building and the edge of pavement for Bay Esplanade and will serve as the dumpster staging area for the development. However, the proposed width (15 feet) of the dumpster staging area is excessive and it is recommended that it be reduced by half. Termination of Status of Nonconformity: The development proposal includes a request for termination of status of nonconformity to permit 13 of the 18 existing dwelling units located at 64 Bay Esplanade to remain, where only eight attached dwelling units would otherwise be permitted. As previously noted, the subject property presently consists of two separate developments: the 18-unit Cavalier Motel at 64 Bay Esplanade, which is nonconforming with Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07065 - 2 of 7 • s regard to density (66.7 du/ac), and the 3 rental units at 566 Bay Esplanade, which conform to allowable density (10.52 (Iu/ac). The applicant desires to terminate the status of nonconformity for 13 of the 18 existing dwelling units at 64 Bay Esplanade and redevelop 566 Bay Esplanade to its maximum allowable density (8 dwelling units). This will enable the development of 21 attached dwelling units on the combined subject properties. The termination of status of nonconformity criteria as per Section 6-109, including compliance with perimeter buffer requirements, the provision of required landscaping for off-street parking lots and bringing nonconforming signs, lighting and accessory .uses/structures into compliance with the Code will be met with this development proposal. The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with those criteria: Consistent Inconsistent 1. Perimeter buffers conforming to the requirements of Section 3-1202.13 shall X be installed. 2. Off-street parking lots shall be improved to meet the landscaping standards X established in Section 3-1202.E. 3. Any nonconforming sign, outdoor lighting or other accessory structure or X accessory use located on the lot shall be terminated, removed or brought into conformity with this development code. 4. The comprehensive landscaping and comprehensive sign programs may be X used to satisfy the requirements of this section. Beach by Design: In 1997 and 1998, a Plan was prepared for the City entitled "Clearwater Beach: Strategies for Revitalization. " This Plan was prepared after an extensive public process, directive surveys and input from the City Council and City administration. The purpose of Beach by Design, which was adopted by the City Council in 2001, is to implement the recommendations of that Plan and regulate development within certain areas of the beach. The subject property is located within the "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area redevelopment plan and is defined as "an area of transition between resort uses in Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia (Street). " In order to implement this vision, Beach by Design identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development within the "Old Florida" District. Further, Beach by Design states that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. While "mid-rise" is not specifically defined within the Community Development Code, based upon the height standards set forth in the Medium Density Residential (MDR), Tourist (T), and High Density Residential (HDR) Districts, the Planning Department has interpreted "mid-rise" development as having a maximum height of 50 feet. As noted above, Beach by Design identifies single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development within the "Old Florida" District. However, the development proposal is inconsistent with this preference as it is for a condominium. The existing developments have a combined density of 38.18 dwelling units per acre, which will be replicated by the proposed development and is therefore consistent with Beach by Design with regard to limiting density to that of existing improvements. Further, the proposed height of the building (52 feet to roof deck), while slightly in excess of the interpreted 50-foot "mid-rise" threshold, is generally consistent with Beach by Design. Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07065 - 3 of 7 r? f? • Based upon the above and despite the development proposals deviation from the preferred development type, the project is found to be predominantly consistent with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design. Therefore, the development proposal can be supported. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria (Section 2-803.C): The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria pursuant to Section 2-803.C: Consistent Inconsistent I . The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and X development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting X properties. 3. The uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are X otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel X proposed for development. 6. The design of the proposed Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project creates a form and function that enhances the community character of the X immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate X vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street X parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist (T) District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. General Applicability Standards (Section 3-913.A): The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the General Applicability Standards pursuant to Section 3-913.A: Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. X 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. X 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent X Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07065 - 4 of 7 • 0 Compliance with Standards and Criteria (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): The following table depicts the development proposals consistency with the standards and criteria as per Sections 2-801.1 and 2- 803.3: Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 30 dwelling units per 21 dwelling units X acre (16 dwelling units) Impervious 0.95 0.60 X Surface Ratio Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 sq. ft. 24,258 square feet (0.55 acres) X Lot Width 50 - 100 feet 107.13 feet X Height 35 feet 52 feet (to roof deck) X ** Parking Spaces 1.5 spaces per unit 33 spaces (1.57 spaces per unit) X (32 spaces) Front Setback 0-15 feet South: 15 feet (to building); X *** East: 0 feet (to pavement); and West: 15 feet (to building) Side Setback 0-10 feet North: 10 feet (to pavement); and X 15 feet (to building) * See above discussion with regard to Termination of Status of Nonconformity. ** See above discussion with regard to Beach by Design. *** See above discussion with regard to Setbacks. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with this site. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials on August 4, 2005. The Planning Department recommends APPROVAL of the Flexible Development application to permit 21 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height from 35 feet to 52 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of eight dwelling units would otherwise be permitted under current Code) under the provisions of Section 6-109, based upon the following recommended findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law and with the following conditions of approval: Recommended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.55 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 3. That the development proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development; 4. That the development proposal complies with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which states that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code; Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07065 - 5 of 7 • • 5. That the subject property is currently developed with 18 overnight accommodation units at 64 Bay Esplanade and 3 overnight accommodation units at 566 Bay Esplanade; 6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 16 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 7. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with overnight accommodations and detached dwellings with heights varying between one and three stories, with the surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and detached dwellings; 8. That the height of the proposed building is 52 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 9. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property; 10. That the development proposal meets the requirements for a termination of status of nonconformity as per Section 6-109 to permit 13 dwelling units where eight units would otherwise be allowed at 64 Bay Esplanade; 11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3- 913.A; and 12. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of Section 2-803.C. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That the existing water main within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way is upgraded to the satisfaction of the Fire Department in order to ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes, and that said upgrades are depicted on a revised Grading, Drainage & Utilities Site Plan (sheet 4 of 5) prior to the issuance of a Development Order; 2. That fire flow calculations are provided by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure adequate water supply; 3. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 5. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with .regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07065 - 6 of 7 • • 12. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 13. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 14. That the proposed gated access is eliminated or that the plans are revised to provide some means by which guests can gain. access to the off-street parking area to the satisfaction of Traffic Engineering and Planning Department staff, 15. That the site plan is revised to depict the location of facilities to accommodate recyclables; and 16. That the width of the dumpster staging area is reduced to a size of approximately 7.5 feet. Prepared by Planning Department Staff. Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning DepartmentlC D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending caseAbp for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 566 -Hess (7) - 09-20-05 - R71Bay Esplanade 566 Staff Report.doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - September 20, 2005 Case FLD2005-07065 - 7 of 7 9:30 am Case Number: FLD2005-0, T) -- 566 BAY ESPLANADE • Owner(s): Pauline D Hess Trust C/O Hess, Pauline D Tre Clearwater, F133767 TELEPHONE: No Phone, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: No Email Representative: Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, Fl 34695 TELEPHONE: 727-793-9888, FAX: 727-793-9855, E-MAIL: keith@keithzayac.com Location: The 0.55-acre property is located at the northeast corner of Bay Esplanade and Cypress Avenue. Atlas Page: 258A Zoning District: T, Tourist Request: Flexible Development approval to permit a 21 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District and an increase to height from 35 feet to 53 feet as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Proposed Use: Attached dwellings Neighborhood Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Association(s): Clearwater, F133761 2544 Frisco Drive TELEPHONE: 727-725-3345, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: Djw@gte.net Neighborhood Clearwater Beach Association Association(s): Clearwater, Fl 33767 100 Devon Dr TELEPHONE: 443-2168, FAX: No Fax, E-MAIL: papamurphy@aol.com Presenter: Robert Tefft, Planner III Attendees Included: Neil Thompson, Scott Rice, Rick Albee, Robert Tefft Applicant Representative: Keith Zayac The DRC reviewed this application with the following comments: General Engineering: 1 . Prior to building permit: 1. A right-of-way permit will be required for all work within the ROW of Gulfview Blvd. Contact Engineering at (727) 562-4750 in Room 220.at the Municipal Services Building. General Note: DRC review is a prerequisite for Building Permit Review, additional comments may be forthcoming upon submittal of a Building Permit Application. Environmental: I . No Issues Fire: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 10 1 . ***PLEASE Ngk*** REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE A40HORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL NOT RELEIVE THE APPLICANT OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE 2004 EDITION. This DRC Review by Fire is not an approval or review of any construction plans or documents other than site work. Please acknowledge PRIOR TO CDB. 2. This building is to be protected by a fire sprinkler system meeting the requirements of NFPA-13. Please acknowledge with intent of comply prior to CDB. 3 . Clearances of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of the fire hydrant, with a 4 foot clearance to the rear of the hydrant are required to be maintained as per NFPA-1. Please acknowledge with intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 4. Fire Department Connections shall be indentified by a sign that states "No Parking, Fire Department Connection" and shall be designed in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation standards for information signage and be maintained with a clearance of 7 1/2 feet in front of and to the sides of appliance, as per Florida Fire Prevention Code 2004 edition. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 5. Where underground water mains and hydrants are to be installed, they shall be installed, tested and in service prior to construction as per NFPA-241. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 6. Provide fire flow calculation by a Fire Protection Engineer to ensure adequate water supply.Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. 7. Provide Class I standpipe system per NFPA-1,13.2.2.2. Please acknowledge intent to comply PRIOR TO CDB. Harbor Master: Legal: No Issues No Issues Land Resources: I , The tree removals on the Demo Plan are inconsistant with all other plans, revise prior to Building Permit. 2. Show to be preserved the four palm trees in the right of way prior to Building Permit. 3 . Remove the tree removal calculations from the plans prior to Building Permit. These calculations will be performed when the tree removal permit is applied for. Landscaping: 1 . No Issues Parks and Recreation: 1 . Open space/recreation impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits or final plat (if applicable) whichever occurs first. These fees could be substantial and it is recommended that you contact Art Kader at 727-562-4824 to calculate the assessment. Stormwater: 1 . 1. Required Volume of pond must follow City of Clearwater Stormwater Design Criteria where Vol delta C x A x i x 3600; Additionally, the existing impervious area is limited to a 50% credit in the predevelopment C calculations (use a value of .49 rather than .98). 2. Outfall to a ROW requires a 50-year design storm. 3. Please review the predevelopment C calculation for area of Open Space. Viewing the existing survey, it appears that there is significantly less existing area than reported in the calculations. 4. 6" freeboard is required on ponds 5. Include more, proposed grades for sidewalk adjacent to pond. 6. Provide cross section of pond, banks of ponds may only be 4:1 (H:V). Up to 2 sides (50%) of pond may be vertical walls. 7. Demonstrate Pond recovery within 24 hours. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Solid Waste: I , Please provide recycling area for residents contact Tom Glenn 727-734-0920 for any information Traffic Engineering: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 11 Ensure that the Oical heieht clearance for Darkine earaee is 8'295 accommodate H/C van per ADAAG. 2. Driveway does not meet the 125' minimum spacing requirements between intersection and driveway. All of the above to be addressed prior to CDB. Planning: Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 12 I . There is a jog alon's'?Phe south property line (approx midway). ProvOM the building setback from this portion of the property line. 2. Is there a change in grade between the drive aisle within the garage and the non-vehicular use areas? 3 . It would appear that the garage is to have gated access, provide the dimension to the gate from the edge of pavement within the right-of-way. Also, clearly identify the gate on the site plan and identify the means by which guests can obtain access to the parking garage. 4. Although noted as being a 20' x 20' sight visibility triangle, the sight visibility triangle at the intersection of Cypress and Clearwater St. is only 17'x 17'. Additionally, the sight visibility triangle at Clearwater Street and Bay Esplanade exceeds 20'x 20'. Please revise. 5. Site plan sheet A1.01 differs from site plan sheet 3 of 5. Clarify which plan is intended. 6. The drive aisle is 24' wide; however the gated access encroaches into the drive aisle reducing the width to 20'. Revise the gated access so as not to encroach upon the drive aisle. 7. What is the depth of the swimming pool? Provide a building section to clarify the impact of the pool on the dwelling unit below. 8 . Sheet A2.01, A2.02 and A2.03 do not match sheet A2.10 with regard to the east lobby / elevator / trash room / stair locations. 9. The archtectural elevations do not line up with the denoted building height dimensions (i.e. the dimensioned floors bisect the windows and doors). 10. The architectural elevations are dimensioned with a height of 52'-8" to roof slab; however the building has a pitched roof. Revise the elevations to correctly dimension the height. Also, the site data table denotes a height of 52'. Please clarify. 11 . Provide details as to the architectural features of the building. A higher quality elevation drawing will need to be provided prior to the application being heard by the CDB. 12. How is recycling being handled? 13. Provide a roof plan? 14. Depict the locations of all proposed mechanical equipment and depict how the mechanical equipment will be screened. IM According to the City's Occupational License records, the subject properties consist of a total of 18 overnight accommodation units. With an allowable density of 40 du/ac for overnight accommodation units, the 0.55 acre property could be permitted 22 overnight accommodation units; thus the property is not non-conforming. As such, the permitted density of 30 du/ac for attached dwellings would be 16 dwelling units and the development proposal should be modified accordingly. 16. The submitted Description of Requests (Attachment "B") denotes a termination of non-conformity for 8 overnight accommodation units and conversion to 6 multiple family condominium units. As noted previously, the subject property is not nonconforming with regard to overnight accommdation units; therefore this request is invalid and a revised Description of Requests need be submitted. Additionally, the request pertaining to height is potentially incorrect and may need to be revised once the architectural elevations are modified to dimension height measured to the mid-point of the pitched roof. 17. With regard to General Applicability criterion #1, the denoted density is unobtainable and the response will need to be modified based upon the maximum density of 16 attached dwelling units. Further, criterion #1 requires that the proposed development be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties. The response provided does not sufficiently address the criteria with regard to the above elements and the adjacent properties as the referenced projects (Nepenthe, La Risa I and La Risa II) do not yet exist. 18. Provide a revised response to General Applicability Criterion #6, which addresses how the design of the development proposal minimizes adverse visual impacts. 19. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #1, clarify how the development proposal is impractical without the requested deviation to height. 20. With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #7, provide a rationale as to how the proposed increase to height will enhance the community character of the immediate vicinity and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 21 . With regard to Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criterion #8, clarify how the community character is benefitted by a building that will exceed 50 feet in height. Other: No Comments Notes: This application is insufficient for the CDB. Submit revised plans and application package by Noon, September 1, 2005 for review by DRC on September 29, 2005. Development Review Agenda -Friday, August 5, 2005 - Page 13 LLn OCITY OF CLEtRWATER ° "Ci earwater July 13, 2005 > PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4576 W W W.MYCLEARWATER. COM Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 RE: FLD2005-07065 -- 566 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Completeness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-07065. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on August 06, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your representative (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional comments may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 562-4539 or Robert.Tefft@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Robert Tefft Planner III Letter of Completeness - FLD2005-07065 - 566 BAY ESPLANADE • Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning July 11, 2005 Mr. Robert Tefft City of Clearwater Planning Department 100 S. Myrtle Ave. Clearwater, FL 33756 • 421-05 Client 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith(akeithzayac. com 2005 RE: FLD2006-07065-566 Bay Esplanade-Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Tefft: 1.) The Flexible Development Application / Affidavit to Authorize Agent identifies Stephen T. Hess as the property owner, however, with regard to the property 64 Bay Esplanade (05/29115154756107910020), the Pinellas County Property Appraiser identifies the property owner as Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC. Please revise the application and Affidavit accordingly. Stephen Hess is the President of Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC and has signed the application as an authorized representative. The application has been revised to include Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC in the ownership list 2.) Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Development Application for an Application, a tree C survey is required to be provided. Please refer to the Survey attached to the resubmittal package for all existing bees contained on site. Also, on Sheet 2 of the Demolition Plan existing frees are called out to be removed. 3.) Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive lnfill Project, the landscape plan shall delineate and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers. On Sheet 5 of the landscape plan all required landscape buffers and curbing have been dimensioned. 4.) Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive lnfill Project, the landscape plan shall delineate and dimension all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing. All parking areas are located within the building envelope. The dimensions of the parking garage spaces and driveway curbing is shown on sheets 3 & S. 5.) Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive lnfill Project, building elevation drawings shall identify the proposed colors and materials of the building. • • 421-05 Client The anchilecturai package has been augmented wide color labels and matenafs for all sides of the bultdfng. Si ce , I.g Keith E. Zayac, P.E., R.L.A. ?• ;1: Keith Zayac & Associates, Inc. JUL 1 .? 2005 PIANN'S ,.?. C, 2 ,1 *?. , , • Keith Zavac & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture, Planning Hess Condominiums Stormwater Narrative n U 701 S. Enterprise Road E., Ste 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 (727) 793-9888 Phone (727) 793-9855 Fax keith@keithzayac.com The stormwater system is designed to treat the first half-inch of runoff from the site, and attenuate the 25 year 1 hour storm event. The system consists of one normally dry pond. The site runoff is directed to the ponds by underground roof drain connections. The peak discharge is attenuated by a control structure prior to discharge to the public right of way. D Lf i ? 2005 .. ?..N Svcs '"< z, y PLANNING CAry ?_: CD • LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW July 6, 2005 Keith Zayac 701 Enterprise Rd East Ste 404 Safety Harbor, F134695 • CITY OF C LEARWAT E R PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 RE: FLD2005-07065 -- 566 Bay Esplanade -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Keith Zayac : The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number FLD2005-07065. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is incomplete with the following comments: 1. The Flexible Development Application / Affidavit to Authorize Agent identifies Stephen T. Hess as the property owner; however, with regard to the property 64 Bay Esplanade (05/29/15/54756/079/0020), the Pinellas County Property Appraiser identifies the property owner as Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC. Please revise the application and Affidavit accordingly. 2. Pursuant to Section F of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, a tree survey is required to be provided. 3. Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the landscape plan shall delineate and dimension all required perimeter landscape buffers. 4. Pursuant to Section H of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, the landscape plan shall delineate and dimension all parking areas including landscape islands and curbing. 5. Pursuant to Section I of the Flexible Development Application for a Comprehensive Infill Project, building elevation drawings shall identify the proposed colors and materials of the building. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by Noon, Monday, July 11, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (727) 562-4539 or at robert.tefftamyclearwater.com. ely o/u?rs? /? 1? Robert G. Tefft Planner III BRIAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR FIOYI' FIA:MID'ON, COUNCIIAlE:MBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMENIBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMEN'T' AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ENIPLOYER" Jul. 06 2005 11:45AM YOUR LOGO CityOfClearwater-Plan Dept YOUR FAX NO. 727 562 4865 NO. OTHER FACSIMILE START TIME USAGE TIME MODE PAGES RESULT 01 97939855 Jul.06 11:43AM 01'28 SND 02 OK TO TURN OFF REPORT, PRESS 'MENU' #04. THEN SELECT OFF BY DING '+' OR '-'. FOR FAX ADVANTAGE ASSISTANCE, PLEASE CALL 1-800-HELP-FAX C435-7329). 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER LL PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Clearwater 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 U TEL: (727) 562-4567 FAX: (727) 562-4865 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Date: July 6, 2005 To: Keith Zayac, Keith Zayac and Assoc., Inc., (727-793-9855) From: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III Re: 566 Bay Esplanade / FLD2005-07065 Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: 2 Comments: ** Please confirm receipt via e-mail at: robert.teftCc? wlearwater.com ** ** Visit the Planning Department online at www.myclearwater.com ** MEMORANDUM TO: Community Development Board FROM: Wayne M. Wells, AICP wt*j Planner III RE: Request for Time Extension FLD2005-07065 - 64 and 566 Bay Esplanade DATE: January 25, 2007 Attached is information related to the request by Stephen Hess, on behalf of Hess Properties II LLC and Mediterraneo Developments, LLC, for an extension of time relative to the above referenced project located at 64 and 566 Bay Esplanade. A one-year extension is being requested which would expire on March 20, 2008. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, extensions of time "shall be for good cause shown and documented in writing." The Code further delineates that good cause "may include but are not limited to an unexpected national crisis (acts of war, significant downturn in the national economy, etc.), excessive weather-related delays, and the like." In this particular case, the applicant has indicated that the project is being delayed for economic reasons as it relates to deteriorating market conditions. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 4407, the Planning Director has previously granted a six-month extension. The Code further directs that the Community Development Board may consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved code amendments which would significantly affect the project. It should be noted by the Board that in the intervening period subsequent to the original approval, the Code has been amended in the following that affect this project: 1. Section 6-109.13 of the Community Development Code was amended to not allow the conversion of a nonconforming density to a different use. The approval of this project provided for the conversion of nonconforming overnight accommodation density to attached dwelling unit density; 2. The parking requirement for attached dwellings has been amended to two parking spaces per dwelling unit. This project was approved with 33 parking spaces for 21 attached dwelling units, a rate of 1.57 parking spaces per dwelling unit; 3. The allowable parapet height for buildings with flat roofs has been amended to a maximum of 42-inches. The project approved by the CDB included a parapet height of 11 feet; 4. The definition of "Height, building or structure" has been amended so that only elevator equipment rooms and like mechanical equipment enclosures are permitted to project up to 16 feet higher than the maximum height within the district. As approved, the project included appurtenances (architectural embellishments) not consistent with the above definition that projected 19 feet above the roof deck; and 5. The "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area plan has been revised such that it requires a 6.8-foot building stepback along the south fagade of the building at a height of 35 feet. As approved, the project did not incorporate any stepback at this height. Page 1 of 2 Attachments: Letter of Request Time Extension Development Order August 2, 2006 Maps and Photos (Planning Departmentl C D BIFLEX (FLD) (Pending cases) Up for the next CDBIBay Esplanade 064 & 566 Hess (T) -Approved - 2.20.07 CDB - WWIBay Esplanade 064 & 566 - Time Extension Memorandum for 2.20.07 CDB.doc Page 2 of 2 Dilision of Corporations • 0 Flnri I, rpk.,I' t W, j J_ Page 1 of 2 Florida Limited Liability MEDITERRANEO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 784 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 MAILING ADDRESS 784 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 Document Number L05000036151 State FL Last Event LC NAME CHANGE Total Contribution 0.00 FEI Number 202794491 Status ACTIVE Event Date Filed 03/07/2006 Date Filed 04/13/2005 Effective Date NONE Event Effective Date NONE Registered Agent Name & Address HESS, STEPHEN T 784 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 Manager/Member Detail T tl d i e Name & Ad ress HESS, STEPHEN T 784 ISLAND WAY MGRM CLEARWATER FL 33767 http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&nl=LO5000036151 &n2=NAMFW... 1/24/2007 J-. Di*ision of Corporations • • Page 2 of 2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2006 03/22/2006 Previous Filing Return to List Next Filing View Events View Name History Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 03/22/2006 -- ANNUAL REPORT 03/07/2006 -- Merger 03/07/2006 -- LC Name Change 04/13/2005 -- Florida Limited Liabilites THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&nl=LO5000036151 &n2=NAMFW... 1/24/2007 Di,-eision of Corporations . ? Y 0 . Page 1 of 1 MEDITERRANEO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC Document Number Date Filed Effective Date Status L05000036151 04/13/2005 None Active EVENT TYPE FILED EFFECTIVE DESCRIPTION DATE DATE 11 LC NAME 03/07/2006 OLD NAME WAS : BAY ESPLANADE PROPER CHANGE TIES, LLC THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/corevt.exe?a1=DETNAM&n1=L05000036151&n2=FLAL 1/24/2007 . - Division of Corporations Page 1 of 2 *%WV Florida Limited Liability HESS PROPERTIES II, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS 784 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 Changed 04/29/2005 MAILING ADDRESS 784 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 Changed 04/29/2005 Document Number FEI Number Date Filed L04000076365 N/AE 10/21/2004 State Status Effective Date FL INACTIVE NONE Last Event Event Date Filed Event Effective Date MERGED 03/07/2006 NONE Total Contribution 0.00 Registered Agent Name & Address HESS, STEPHEN T 784 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 Address Cbanged: 04/29/2005 Manaaer/Member Detail Titl e Name & Address HESS, STEPHEN T 784 ISLAND WAY MGRM CLEARWATER FL 33767 http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?a1=DETFIL&n1=LO4000076365&n2=NAMFW... 1/24/2007 Division of Corporations 0 • Page 2 of 2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2005 04/29/2005 Previous Filing ) Return to List ` Next Filing View Events No Name History Information Document Images Listed below are the images available for this filing. 04/29/2005 -- ANNUAL REPORT 10/21/2004 -- Florida Limited Liabilites THIS IS NOT OFFICIAL RECORD; SEE DOCUMENTS IF QUESTION OR CONFLICT Corporations Inquiry Corporations Help http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?al=DETFIL&nl =LO4000076365&n2=NAMFW... 1/24/2007 .- inellas County Property Appr ser Information: 05 29 15 54756 079 018800 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 079 / 0020 24-Jan-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:57:38 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales BAY ESPLANADE PROPERTIES LLC OBK: 14266 OPG: 0509 64 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767-1608 EVAC: A EUAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 64 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 l f 2004 - 2005 sa es rom : 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 4 /2,005 14,266/ 509 1,750,000 (0) I 1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 7 /1,998 10,158/2,368 800,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 8 /1,995 9,088/1,680 740,000 (0) I 0000: Book Pgs - 5 /1,987 6,504/1,758 420,000 (0) I 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 1,5001000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .220 Assessed/Cap: 1,500,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 1,500,000 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater View: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 32, 646.00 1) 114 x 110 75. 00 12,761. 97 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 32,646. 00 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 32,646. 00 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 79, T HAT PART OF LOT Description 2 LYING N OF REV LAYOUT OF CLEARW ATER ST & LOT 3 Building Information http://l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 1/24/2007 .? ,'Pinellas County Property Applser Information: 05 29 15 54756 079 018.0 Page 3 of 5 05 / 29 1 15 1 54756 / 079 l 0020 :01 24-Jan-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:57:38 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 64 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Concrete Block Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Plaster Furred Total Units 16 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 48 Bath Tile Flo.or and Wall Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,951 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Are.-as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 7,067 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 . 1,566 8) .00 0 3) Utility .40 35 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commsrcial Extra Fcatllres Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIO/DECK 530SF 5.00 530 2,650 1,060 1,981 2) POOL 924 SF 30,000.00 1 30,000 12,000 1,981 3) SHUFBDCT 312 SF 1,250.00 1 1,250 1,250 999 4) ASPHALT 5000 1.75 51000 8,750 8,750 999 5) 00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 23,060 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) F*? [;? Fil I FQ Iq http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 1/24/2007 Pinellas County Property Apper Information: 05 29 15 54756 079 0 1 0 19 c , F-- 73- f-0 A f ]NT z CL nI C YPRUS 605- c 11?12 5 ' SP NA w If ESPA.NAD A c B Y l ESPLANAD AVE S83 CIAVE 5 CYPRUS AVE VE A CQ?AMUM1SITY CNIN BAY ESPLANADE Z 54810 L_ ? 92 (BAY C YP REUS. ,7 64 SPLNIA 4 34 C)i ky rn k A `( 'ANADE - "?NADE N SPLSANAD ESPLANADE) BAY IPLANAC B07 SPLANA PLANAEIE OMMON ,PWI A VIAY 87 Page 4 of 5 BGS!S) BAY -s c {c'? ESPLANADE w f_n e? 5? 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 1/24/2007 http://l 36.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-click?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=0... 1/24/2007 Pinllas County Property Appser Information: 05 29 15 54756 079 00 Page 2 of 5 / 05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 079 / 0180 24-Jan-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:55:14 Ownership Information Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales HESS PROPERTIES II LLC OBK: 14266 OPG: 0507 784 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767-1815 EVAC: A EVAC Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 566 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2006, based on Census Tract: 260.02 s from 2004 - 2005: l sa e 11008,000 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 4 /2,005 14,2661 507 495,100 {U} I 1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { } 2006 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 809,500 Homestead: NO Ownership .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 809,500 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 809,500 Agricultural: 0 2006 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Clearwater view: 06 Millage: 21.7640 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 06 Taxes: 17,617.96 1} 107 x 110 75.00 11, 770.00 S Special Tax .00 2} 0 x 0 .00 .00 3} 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2006 taxes will be : 5} 0 x 0 .00 .00 17, 617.96 6} 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2006 taxes will be 17, 617.96 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 79, LOTS 18 & 19 (PER Description PLAT BK 20 PG 27) LESS R/W FOR CLEARWATER ST Building Information http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=05... 1/24/2007 Pin las County Property App*er Information: 05 29 15 54756 079 0 80 Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriptions 05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 079 / 0150 :01 24-Jan-2007 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 18:55:13 Residential Card 01 of i Prop Use: 220 Land Use: 08 Living Units: 4 Imp Type: Duplex/Triplex Prop Address: 566 BAY ESPLANADE Structural E1am?nts Foundation Continuous Wall Quality Average Floor System Slab on Grade Year Built 1,950 Exterior Wall ConcBk Stucco/Reclad Effective Age 20 Roof Frame Flat-Shed Heating Rvrse Cycle/Wall Unt Roof Cover B U Tar&Gravel/Othr Cooling None Fixtures 12 # Stories 1.0 Other Depreciation 0 Floor Finish Crpt/Unyl/SftWd/Terr Functional Depreciation 0 Interior Finish Drywall/Plaster Econonomic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3 as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 3,092 7) .00 0 2) Utility .25 63 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6). .00 0 12) .00 0 RasiclE! ntial Extra F?atur?s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) PATIO/DECK 430sf 5.00 430 21150 860 1,980 2) FIREPLACE 5,000.00 1 5,000 2,000 1,950 3) PATIO/DECK 10x28 5.00 280 1,400 560 1,980 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 3,420 Map With Property Address (non-vacant) Fil I M? http://136.174.187.13/htbin/egi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=05... 1/24/2007 Pinellas County Property Apprser Information: 05 29 15 54756 079 00 609 - M Cy P Pus ?8 SF' JAMA d __?.,?...... AVE ESP r. N'A.D ?I I~ 605 BAY L AV ? CY 't?RL?J'S C0G ? SPL?+.NA E r+ t-? ESPLBANAD 607 PR0 U Ln CYSPRUS SPLBAN ADE AVE AVE BABY CYPRUS BAY US 584 AVE SPLANA? SPLA 4 ' YPR S 579 - „ Y'TA AVE CYPRUS BAY O INAY r-CrMUN17Y A'VE SPLANADE ? c N 1 " CYA ?fE?S BAY C?5 ESPLANADE z SPLANADE 8 7 F-- I SPLBA( ESPB*?j AY ESPLANADE) 33.,t?I Sq BAY ? ,^r 'r. c c) ESPLANADE ?O-i i} ? 04 ? (f5 1/8 Mile Aerial Photograph (2002) Page 4 of 5 3&1,47. 36 . ic.19http://136.174.187.13/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=05... 1/24/2007 Page 5 of 5 Back to Search Pa2e An explanation of this screen http://136.174.187.131htbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.16&s=4&t3=1 &u=0&p=05... 1/24/2007 • CARDENA ST a 0*? VQ D28@!A ? ?° yam ?o 0 AcAaA sr SOMEFSET [? ? sn? o p CAMBRIA a o PROJECT P?E SITE NBLW0W BqY A m NENDALL A O ESF4ANM 7 P ?ao`a?mwwv7 BAYMONT ST u?Qa w o s?N a' ?OFp P"- ? 3 p01NT ? c PAPAYA Sr u?i PaggpGE c DOW a 4 Pm' B0 O caar BM o WC4WAFM p RRST S7 0 ?ST h nriRp ar DR Location Map Owner. Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC. ( Case: FLD2005-07065 Site: 566 Bay Esplanade Property Size (Acres) : 0.55 05/29/15/54756/079/0180 PIN: & 05/29/15/54756/079/0020 Atlas Page: 258A S.\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD)\Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Esplanade 566 - Hess (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Bay Esplanade 566 - Location Map.doc rra a Owner: Bay Esplanade Properties, LLB`.;. ..rase: PLD2005--0706 Proper#y it 566 Pay Esplanade M ize(Acres): 05/29/15/54756/079/0180 PIN: 05/29/15/54756/079/(X)20 Atlas Page. 258A ,.: ?•,f'f[7ritYf??C? %?E'K?'sf$sr>F?rit ?f.` r?• fS?r`E.fiY, fr:.Ci;''?l=•F?ill?ilit7 t;CKif?S?.t1K? 3`i;l ?siY, fY?Xi t? ?f??,?:C7`,? h<%£xCYY1:7CTG-' y!?• - i.s?aS j73 . 09-20415 S r,S9C,7 1^•, 7y'E::F7larlode 566.. Aerii7l • • I 99 I a FPS `? ?? ' I 832 81$ ??K - ? ?/ / `i 1 I •7 t -- - 1 11 I /? .!? .' I y "" % ' N I? I It e r L h I ? w ---1 622 _- I M ?? ? ,- ' I 18 - i ?? gtt I = ' ' L-- r-, ? I Q -- 4 ? 16121 W 5?1 ZI ? ? 11 n i t-- , 1 614 D 1 O SIR J/ r- B0? Bq6 -? 1 DI S, ' 6p8, ? r.-- T Q lam i 1 D 3 t r-40- 60 1 I 1 - 1 D 1 1 J 1 1 605 -- -, ---1 ` i -1 Y.. r- Lt m t99 ?- ?g I ' 581 I ' I ' I I I 1 579 I -? L-? 579 -"t I k, 1 --i 1 1-- I Tl _ 1 --1 ? T ' T rl - I l I i 1 ; , I I -- 1566 5 , I 1 {_ , 1 f$ `- 561 r- 531 OS1 R , I r' i fa?4 1 1 I 1 `t 1 t"r =--? 1 1 1 1 1 532 530 ------------ Zoning Map Owner Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC. Case: FLD2005-07065 Site: 566 Bay Esplanade Property 0.55 Size (Acres) : 05/29/15/54756/079/0180 PIN: & 05/29/15/54756/079/0020 Atlas Page: 258A SAPlanning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Esplanade 566 - Hess (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Bay Esplanade 566 - Zoning Map.doc 631-??? , sae 829 Att - e4 ,- , Dwc Bs, 1 ings t ?j 7 -'ht o s --, W I---? W -- ?? ?1 f ?? r q j 61A _I Q W r 40 ern t--1 614 It 2 r? mo ti_onsi ; `l D 617 eo `J soe 64e -C -` __ I 0 , , r I i Park a . ' 6Q6-I ; __-?-- m 1 6might ' j 1 L_ -Bd6 ' b cc+p odations B05 ; I 1 D i , 58 eta _ I ,_ ??; D I h m JUANITA WAY I 0 1 flo [is Place Parki I W4 L- orst>Ei, e'I h 56s 574,ot Re 1 `-' I coni I (L ?dn I ? ' l_ i 561 531 v n City Park City;; r - - I I Park ------ Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. I Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC. Case: FLD2005-07065 Site: 566 Bay Esplanade Property 0.55 Size(Acres): 05/29/15/54756/079/0180 PIN: & 05/29/15/54756/079/0020 Atlas Page: 258A S:\Planning Department\C D B\FLEX (FLD) \Pending cases\Up for the next CDB\Bay Esplanade 566 - Hess (T) - 09-20-05 - RT\Maps\Bay Esplanade 566 - Existing Use Map.doc • ! Looking west across Bay Esplanade toward subject property (566 Bay Esplanade). -W I -? ..gla Looking northwest across Bay Esplanade toward adjacent property to the north. w 0466, Looking southwest across Bay Esplanade toward subject property (566 Bay Esplanade). I NIq bbs, Looking northeast from Bay Esplanade toward subject property (64 Bay Esplanade). 64 Bay Esplanade and 566 Bay Esplanade F'LD2005-07064 Looking north from Bay Esplanade toward subject property (Bay Esplanade). tommunity Response Tea, Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No.?t1T),AW5- 0%6 5 Meeting Date: 9 ! LUOD Location: ? Current Use: 1 )tf)- MA I MUZ?A ? Active Code Enforcement Case 0 yes: ? Address number Des) (no) (vacant land) ? Landscaping es (no) ? Overgrown (yes) ? Debris (yes) (0 ? Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) (no)`? ? Building(s) (good) far (poor) (vacant land) ? Fencing (none) oo) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint (good) (fair) (oo) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes) 0) ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) n) ? Signage (none) (ok) (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) (tri e) (handicapped) (needs repaving) ? Dumpster (enclosed) (n enclos ) ? Outdoor storage (es (no) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): i Date: Reviewed by:4? 4? Clr) Telephone: Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, September 20, 2005, beginning at 10:00 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (reconsidered from 07/19/05) The City of Clearwater is requesting reconsideration of the attached sign approved through the Comprehensive Sign Program application contained within the Flexible Development Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project application that approved a problematic use for Amscot Financial in this location. [Proposed Use: Problematic Use (Amscot)] at 1874 North Highland Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 32.08. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-01004 2. Ardent International LLC., Panaviotis and Helen Vasiloudes (M313 Development LLC) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 3.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade & 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat, Blk 77, Lots 1 & 3 and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 3. Raim & Xheziie Tzekas [A Very Important Pet (AVID) Salon] are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow pet grooming and outdoor dog training in conjunction with a pet supply store and to permit a 6-ft tall fence located in front of the building (approximately 5 ft back from the N Lincoln Ave frontage), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C. (Proposed Use: Pet Grooming/Outdoor Training Facility) at 1242 Cleveland St, Padgett's Estates Sub, Lot 3 and parts of Lots 2 & 4. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-06058 4. Harborside Condo LLC (Mark Newkirk) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (16 existing attached dwelling units; 15 attached dwelling units proposed, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 15 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to 12.4 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 8.3 ft (to pavement) and from 10 ft to 4.3 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 10.8 ft (to pavement) and from 20 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 87.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.67 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck), under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 706 Bayway Blvd, Bel Crest Condo, Units 1-12 & 14-17. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07070 a 0 5. K&P Clearwater Estate H LLC (Mark International LLC, Sunrise on the Beach Inc) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (22 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 16 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 13 dwelling units permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 16 attached dwellings with reductions to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 90 ft along Coronado Dr and Hamden Dr, a reduction to the front (south) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6 ft (to sidewalk), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.5 ft (to midpoint of roof) and to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.B. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 229 Coronado Dr, Columbia Sub Replat, parts of Lots 1 & 2. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07061 6. LOPA LLC (Patricia A. Bilotta & Lorri S. Ritter) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 3 attached dwellings with a reduction to the front (south) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (east) setback from 25 ft to 14 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to building) and a reduction to the required number of parking spaces from 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit (5 spaces) to 1.33 spaces per dwelling units (4 spaces), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to zero ft, as part of a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 1254 Grove St, Property of AJ Moore, Lots 14 & 15. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05042 7. Coates I, Inc. is requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 11 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 53.25 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 9 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft, as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 621 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay unit No 5 Replat, Blk 78, Lots 5 & 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner IIl. FLD2005-07064 8. Jerry & Teresa Tas are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (27 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 20 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 10 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 83 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 18 ft for architectural embellishments (f rom roof deck), a reduction to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 14.94 ft (to building) and zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to 14.88 (to building/pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pavement), and a reduction to the minimum lot width from 100 ft to 67.5 ft along Coronado Dr and to 71.64 ft along Hamden Dr as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C.. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 342 Hamden Dr, Columbia Sub No 2, Blk A, Lot 11 & part of Lot 10, and Columbia Sub No 3, Lot 7 & part of Lot 6. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-07066 9. Hess Properties H LLC, and Bay Esplanade Properties LLC (Stephen T Hess) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (15 existing overnight 0 0 accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 8 dwelling units would be permitted under current Code) at 64 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 6-109; and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 21 attached dwellings within the Tourist (T) District with an increase to ht from 35 ft to 51.66 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 0 ft (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 64 & 566 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 79, Lots 3, 18 & 19 (less R/W for Clearwater St), and part of Lot 2. Assigned Planner: 9pfrert G: Tefft',Pl-qnner Ill. FLD2005-07065 10. Seawake Motel Ltd (Enchantment, LLC) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (110 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 82 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of 40 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 90 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 7 ft (to entry sidewalk) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 15.7 ft ( to sidewalk) and from 20 ft to 14 ft (to cantilevered balconies), an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 150 ft (to roof deck), a deviation to allow a building within visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-07023) of 3 dwelling units from 125 Brightwater Dr, 4 dwelling units from 161 Brightwater Dr and 1 dwelling unit from 321 Coronado Dr, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 691 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 16-19 & Rip Rts & land on S of Lot 19. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06057/TDR2005-07023 11. Clearwater Grande Dev LLC (Steve J Page) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (91 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 68 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 43 dwelling units permitted under current Code); and (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 68 attached dwellings with a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 6.3 ft (to sidewalk), a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 6.8 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 18 ft (to building), from 20 ft to 17.6 ft (to open stairs) and from 20 ft to 8.8 ft (to pool deck), an increase to the building ht from 35 ft to 99.5 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 11.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 16.67 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a deviation to allow the building within the sight visibility triangles and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 645-655 S Gulfview Blvd, Bayside Sub No 5 Blk C, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner 111. FLD2005-07072 12. Canterbury Property Mgt Inc, TLS Holdings Inc, Dorothy C Boldog Tre, and Canterbury Oaks Inc are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (127 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 95 attached dwellings units, where a maximum of 54 dwelling units are permitted under current Code); (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 100 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (west along South Gulfview Blvd) setback from 15 ft to 5.45 ft (to building), from 15 ft to zero ft (to decorative architectural pavement pedestrian plaza) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to dumpster staging area), a reduction to the front (north along Fifth St.) setback from 15 ft to 3.63 ft (to building), a reduction to the front (east along Coronado Dr) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a 0 0 reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 15 ft (to building) and an increase to building ht from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 8.5 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 21 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings) at 401, 411, & 421 S Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub Lots 72-77, 121-122, 124, 128-129 & parts of Lots 123 & 127. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07068 13. KP 23 Enterprises Inc, Peter & Kelly L Nascarella, and KP 26 LLC are requesting Flexible Development approval (1) to permit vehicle sales/display and an automobile service station in the Commercial District with reductions to the front (east)setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to pavement), from 25 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building) and from 5 ft to zero ft to retain existing signage (to the leading edge of the sign), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5.8 ft (to carport) and from 10 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), reductions to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to required parking from 55 spaces to 30 spaces, an increase to sign ht from 14 ft to 15 ft (for existing signage), a deviation to allow vehicle sales/display contiguous to residentially-zoned property, a deviation to allow the display of vehicles for sale outdoors and a deviation to allow direct access to a major arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, and reductions to the landscape buffer width along S Missouri Ave from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to 13.7 ft (to existing building), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the south property line from 5 ft to 3.9 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to single family dwellings from 12 ft to 5.8 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer width along the west property line adjacent to a nonresidential use from 5 ft to 3.5 ft (to pavement and existing building), a reduction to the foundation landscaping adjacent to buildings from 5 ft to zero ft and a reduction to reduce the interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.45 percent of the vehicular use area, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G; and (2) to permit non-residential off- street parking in the Low Medium Density Residential District, with a deviation to allow landscaping on the inside of a perimeter fence, as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-204.E. (Proposed Use: Vehicles display and sales) at 1460, 1470 and 1480 S Missouri Ave, A H Duncan's Resub Parts of Lots 11-13, and Zephyr Hills Sub Lots 7-10. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2003-08039 14. Parkdale LLC (Belleair Harbor, LLC, Maria Nikolova) are requesting Flexible Development approval to permit attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot area requirement from 10,000 sq ft to 8,171 sq ft, a reduction to the minimum lot width requirement from 100 ft to 60 ft, a reduction to the front (west) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to building), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 20 ft to zero ft (to pool deck) and from 20 ft to 10 ft (to pool), and to permit parking that is designed to back out into the public right-of- way, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C, and preliminary plat approval for 2 lots. [Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (2 units)] at 475 East Shore Dr, Clearwater Beach Park 1" Add Replat Blk C, Lot 5 & Sub Land. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-06056 15. Homeless Emergency Project is requesting Flexible Development application to permit the redevelopment and expansion of an existing residential shelter (including the expansion of the kitchen and dining area), in the Commercial District, to maintain the existing front, side and rear setbacks with the exception of a front (south) setback of 4 ft (to dumpster enclosure), and to permit off site parking, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of 0 0 Sec 2-704.C and as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Residential shelter of 18 units) at 1200 Betty Ln, Fair Burn Add Blk C, Lots 7- 9. Assigned Planner: Michael H. Reynolds, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-07063 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 09/04/05 FLD2005-07065, (154) 108 5TH ST LLC ABOOD, ROBERT G ACHARYA, RAVIN/DRA P 9 SUNSET BAY DR ABOOD, CATHERINE C ACHARYA, KALPANA R BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 4 OAKLEAF CT 47 SAWMILL RD SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 - DUDLEY MA 01571 - ANDRESON, DEAN AVERY, JOSEPHINE BAY ESPLANADE AT CLEARWATER ANDRESON, ANN ULINE, BRADLEY R BE 2046 BRENDLA RD 521 MANDALAY AVE # 704 2110 DREW ST # 100 CLEARWATER FL 33755 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 BAY ESPLANADE CONDO ASSN Bay Esplanade Properties, LLC BAY ESPLANADE 584 BAY ESPLANADE Attn: Stephen T Hess, President 617 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 64 Bay Esplanade CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 Clearwater, FL 33767-1608 BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC BELLE HARBOR OWNERS ASSN INC BELLE HARBOR 627 BAY ESPLANADE 501 MANDALAY AVE 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 BERG, ANNA JACOBSEN BICZ, DANIEL S BODUCH, RAYMOND T 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1409 BICZ, MARGARET C BODUCH, LINDA C CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 521 MANDALAY AVE # 802 521 MANDALAY AVE # 303 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1793 BOMERGER, DAVID RICHARD BOND, GEORGE L JR BOND, YVONNE N BORUTA, SCOTT V 990 W OAK ST 611 POINSETTIA AVE # 101 ZIONSVILLE IN 46077 - 1215 ROSEVILLE ILLE CA 95747 5747 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BOTWICK, ANDREW L BREEZEWAY INC CAMBAS, NICHOLAS A BOTWICK, DIANNE S 602 POINSETTIA AVE 2939 ELYSIUM WAY 1422 NW 111TH AVE CORAL SPRINGS FL 33071 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1635 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - - CASO, RONALD CASTROGIOVANNI, LUKE CASTROGIOVANNI, LUKE CASO, BERNADETTE 9011 S NATOMA CASTROGIOVANNI, KELLY L 3 SUTPHIN AVE OAK LAWN IL 60453 - 9011 S NATOMA MATAWAN NJ 07747 - OAKLAWN IL 60453 - CASWELL LLC CHAPEL BY SEA CLEARWATER BCH CHARBONEAU, RENEE A 949 BRUCE AVE 9342 HIDDEN WATER CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 54 BAY ESPLANADE RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 3031 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1607 CIOCIA, JAMES CLARK, ROBERT B CLARK, TERRY M CIOCIA, TRACY CLARK, SANDRA H CLARK, JANE H 187-11 PEPPER PIKE 13201 CLAYTON RD 16756 WHITES STORE RD LUTZ FL 33558 - ST LOUIS MO 63131 - BOYDS MD 20841 - Clearwater Beach Association Jay Keyes 100 Devon Drive Clearwater, FL 33767 COLTON, JAMES A COLTON, LORI B 421 HAMPTON GREEN PEACHTREE CITY GA 30269 - CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 DIGIACOMO, MICHAEL DIGIACOMO, LESLIE PO BOX 561 KIMBERTON PA 19442 - ECKALL INVESTMENTS LLC 2201 4TH AVE N # 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 ELIAS, SCOTT D 1435 N CLEVELAND # E CHICAGO IL 60610 - EQUITABLE HOLDING CO LLC 7667 EQUITABLE DR # 201 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55344 - Clearwater Neighborhoods Coalition Doug Williams, President, 544 Frisco Drive Clearwater, FL 33761 CORDEIRO, JACK CORDEIRO, ALDA 8209 W CRENSHAW ST TAMPA FL 33615 - DANNA, MARK A 584 BAY ESPLANADE # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 DIGIANNANTONIO, GILBERT DIGIANNANTONIO, PAULETTE 3717 WOODRIDGE PL PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - EGAN, JOHN M 10 PAPAYA ST # 1604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ENGEBRETSEN, ARDEN B 10 PAPAYA ST # 1404 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - EQUITABLE HOLDING CO LLC 7667 EQUITABLE DR # 201 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55455 - FALLER, JANET L PERSONAL RESID FALLON, JOSEPH FALLER, JANET L THE FALLON, SHEILA 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1209 1 SEASIDE LN # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BELLEAIR FL 33756 - FLORENCE ENTERPRISES 603 INDIAN ROCKS RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2056 FLORIDA POWER CORP PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 • COATES I INC 873 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1826 COSTAWAY LLC 15 HEATH WAY BARRINGTON IL 60010 - DE BENEDITTIS, FRANK DE BENEDITTIS, NANCY 4602 104TH ST CORONA NY 11368 - 2813 DIMMITT, LARRY H JR 150 WILLADEL DR BELLEAIR FL 33756 - EGAN, JOHN M 10 PAPAYA ST # 604 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ENTEL, ROBERT J 2471 JOHNNA CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - F S N PROPERTIES LLC 9909 RACETRACK RD TAMPA FL 33626 - FARRELL, BRIAN M FARRELL, CYNTHIA B 5116 WESTSHORE DR NEW PORT RICHEY FL 34652 FLOTO, RONALD J FLOTO, NANCY C 54 SASSOON ROAD POKFULAM 00000 - HONG KONG FULLBACH INVESTMENTS LLC GAHERTY, JOHN B SR GAUDIN, DANIELE 2201 4TH ST N # 200 GAHERTY, CECILIA G 521 MANDALAY AVE # 305 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 5527 S PARK AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - HINSDALE IL 60521 - GIANFILIPPO, JOHN F GIANFILIPPO, LAURA L 162 DEVON DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - GONZALEZ, EDWARD A GONZALEZ, MARITZA 9400 LAWS RD CLEARMONT FL 34711 - HALL, ROGER W HALL, SYLVIA M 521 MANDALAY AVE # 803 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - HICKMAN, GARY HICKMAN, MARY JO 405 ANCHOR ROW PLACIDA FL 33946 - J M C FAMILY INVESTMENTS LTD 2201 4TH ST N STE 200 ST PETERSBURG FL 33704 - 4300 JENNINGS, MARK K JENNINGS, VICKI B 8471 FLOWERING CHERRY LN LAUREL MD 20723 - KAROUNOS, THEODORE P KAROUNOS, LORRAINE J 444 PINE HILL RD LEONIA NJ 07605 - KOZIK, CHRISTIAN A KOZIK, ROBERT D 852 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - KRYGIER, TESSIE LATEK, STANLEY 11109 KAREN DR ORLAND PARK IL 60467 - ?GIANFILIPPO, JOHN BURKETT, FRANKLIN S 1775 CEDAR WAXWING CT PALM HARBOR FL 34683 - GRIECO, DANIEL J II GRIECO, DIANE Y 521 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1794 HARTMAN, JEFFREY E HARTMAN, MARISA A 5 CORD GRASS LN OLD LYME CT 06371 - HOERNIG, OTTO W HOERNIG, JUANITA S 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1201 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - J N E BEACH CONDOS LLC 6326 MACLAURIN DR TAMPA FL 33647 - JOYCE, JILL E 1019 GUISANDO DE AVILA TAMPA FL 33613 - Keith Zayac Keith Zayac and Associates 701 Enterprise Road, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 KRAMER, TERESA A RADFORD, MAXWELL M 3614 S GARDENIA DR 1131 TAMPA FL 33629 - LEVINE, RICHARD LEVINE, BARBARA 5047 OTIS AVE TARZANA CA 91356 - • GIBSON, PAUL F 521 MANDALAY AVE # 610 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - H & HS BEACH PLACE 7105 PELICAN ISLAND DR TAMPA FL 33634 - 7461 HESS, PAULINE D TRUST HESS, STEPHEN T 819 HARBOR ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - IVERSON, DONALD D 1001 SAN MARCO ST # 1001 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - JACOBSEN, GLENN C JACOBSEN, BARBARA D 6 FERRAND WOODS SAINT LOUIS MO 63124 - KAHRS, CAROLYN J KAHRS, HENRY G 4834 QUILL CT PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - KIEFFER, ALAN L KIEFFER, NELLI L 521 MANDALAY AVE # 501 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - KROLL, WOLFGANG KROLL, LILLI 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1006 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - LIEBERMAN, LAWRENCE T LIEBERMAN, DEBORAH S 10 WILLOWOOD LN OLDSMAR FL 34677 - LOLOS, DINOS LYLE, JOHN F M B C PROPERTIES II LLC LOLOS, DIMITRA LYLE, NANCY S 4500 NORTHWOODS LN 627 KINKAID 408 NORTH SHORE DR BLOOMINGTON IN 47404 - DES PLAINES IL 60016 - 5855 KNOXVILLE TN 37919 - MACK, DAVID A •MAGRATH, JAMES P MACK, DAVID A REVOCABLE TRUST AGILLOBERT BERT P P MAGRATH, CAROL A MACK, DAVID A THE 584 BAY ROBERT CLEARWATER ESPLANADE E # # 2 - 1613 2 PRITCHARD LN 30 JELLIFF LN FL 33767 WESTPORT CT 06880 - SOUTHPORT CT 06490 - MAGUIRE, PAUL MAJEWSKI, DENISE M TR MAZAS LAND TRUST 18 GOLDFINCH DR SCHNEIDER, CHRISTINE J 2551 DREW ST # 102 AMERICAN CANYON CA 94503 - 43 LAKE ADALYN DR CLEARWATER FL 33765 - SOUTH BARRINGTON IL 60010 - MC DERMOTT, JAMES T MC SWIGGIN, JAMES MICHAEL, BASKOVICH DRAPP, SHANNON M MC SWIGGINS, CHERYL A MICHAEL, SANDRA 521 MANDALAY DR # 904 12 SAXONY ST 2866 QUAIL HOLLOW RD W CLEARWATER FL 33780 - CLIFTON PARK NY 12065 - CLEARWATER FL 33761 - MOMESSO, NOELLA NAGALE, VISHWANATH T MOMESSO, SERGIO NAGALE, PUSHPAMALA V 10 JONQUILLE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 508 KIRKLAND QC H9H 3C4 00030 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CANADA NEAL, RALPH C OLIVER, ROBERT ORISSA PROPERTIES LTD NEAL, JULIE A OLIVER, CHARLOTTE B 31 BROAD ST 4622 OSAGE CT 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1210 ST HELIER JERSEY JE4 CXW 00000 GREENBAY WI 54313 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - - CHANNEL ISLANDS OSTROWSKI, JOZEF P R M II INV CORP INC PACK, JAMES D OSTROWSKI, RENATA PACK, MARY B 584 BAY ESPLANADE 64 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 30146 E TOPAZ DR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1608 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85258 - PARALITICCI, JESUS PARKS, DANA L PERRY, GREGORY G 611 POINSETTIA AVE # 103 BARKES, MICHAEL G LAHN, MONICA L CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 11961 LOCUST LN 253 GLENSTONE CIR COLUMBUS IN 47201 - BRENTWOOD TN 37027 - PFAFF, ROBERT PLANES, REGINA M POMS, ALAN M PFAFF, BETTY 32700 US HIGHWAY 19 N 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1007 521 MANDALAY AVE # 404 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - POOLE, WILLIAM L III PORPOISE INN INC PRESTON MICHAEL G THE ROBINSON, JOHN CONNIE JR 609 CYPRUS AVE , 419 EASTSHORE DR 3 HUNTERS CROSSING CT CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1621 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 THE WOODLANDS TX 77381 - REHKEMPER, PHILIP A ROBULAK, KENNETH J ROYAL CAMELOT LLC REHKEMPER, BARBARA A ROBULAK, PATRICIA J 5560 BATES 521 MANDALAY AVE # 1105 521 MANDALAY AVE # 302 SEMINOLE FL L 33772 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WSALTZMAN, MURRAY • RUSULIS, ELAINE TRE SALTZMAN, BARBARA SAND KEY CONSULTING LLC 31 ISLAND WAY # 602 1015 NORTH RIVER WALK E CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2206 1170 GULF BLVD # 306 CHICAGO IL 60610 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - SANDOZ, DAVID C SCHAPER, CHARLES F SEIFERT, MICHAEL E SANDOZ, ANN L SEIFERT, NANCY S 580 BAY ESPLANADE 523 N OKLAHOMA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1609 5825 PERSIMMON DR MORTON IL 61550 - MADISON WI 53711 - 5003 SHEAR, L DAVID SHEAR, MARILYN F SHEPPARD, KERILYN 401 E JACKSON ST STE 2700 2650 MCCORMICK DR STE 130 SHEPPARD, KRISTIN TAMPA FL 33602 - 5841 CLEARWATER FL 33759 - 328 SIX MILE RD WHITMORE LAKE MI 48189 - SOBOLESKI, JAMES W STANLEY, BRYAN J STOJAK, JAMES L 191 DEVON DR 114 TURNER ST STOJAK, ROBIN L CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33756 - 3964 MULLENHURST DR PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - SWIDEREK, TIMOTHY J TADROS, HANI S TANKEL, ROBERT L SWIDEREK, JOSEPH A YASSAOUI, SUZANNE TANKEL, TERRI G 4540 WEATHERVANE DR 2184 LAURENCE DR 1022 MAIN ST # D ALPHARETTE GA 30022 - CLEARWATER FL 33764 - DUNEDIN FL 34698 - TEJEDA, RAFAEL E THOMAS-KIRSCHKE, HEIDI THWAITE, EDWARD TEJEDA, IDELFIA A 525 MANDALAY AVE # 24 THWAITE, PATRICIA 3516 WOODRIDGE PL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 15 LOOKOUT POINT TRL* PALM HARBOR FL 34684 - TOTOWA NJ 07512 - TOUCHTON, JOANN TSE TSE LLC TSETSE LLC TOUCHTON, WALTER W 610 MANDALAY AVE 5210 WEBB RD 10 PAPAYA ST # 702 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - TAMPA FL 33615 - 4518 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - VISOSO, ROBERTO WALLACE, A BARBARA WANDACHOWICZ, BOGDAN VISOSO, GRACIELA 606 CYPRUS AVE 10 PAPAYA ST # 1001 521 MANDALAY AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1620 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WARD, MICHAEL S WARSTLER FAMILY TRUST WEYLIE, WALLACE WARD, GISELLE V WARSTLER, ARTHUR K THE 350 GULF BLVD 407 SOUTH ROYAL PALM WAY 521 MANDALAY AVE # 905 INDIAN ROCKS BEACH FL 33785 - TAMPA FL 33609 - CLEARWATER FL 33763 - WILLIAMS, BERNABE REVOCABLE YEAROUT, JAMES YEAROUT, JANE R TR YEAROUT, JANET A WILLIAMS, BERNABE THE 806 NARCISSUS 806 NARCISSUS 1204 SUNCAST LN STE 2 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334 CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 ELDORADO HILLS CA 95762 - YOFAN, AVI YOFAN, JACQUELINE 10 PAPAYA ST # 1202 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ?YOFAN, AVI YOFAN, JACQUELINE 521 MANDALAY AVE # 607 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - ,.rs LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 21, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 Re: FLD2005-07065 - 64 Bay Esplanade and 566 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit 21 attached dwellings in. the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height from 35 feet to 52 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of eight dwelling units would otherwise be permitted under current Code) under the provisions of Section 6-109. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following finding of fact and conclusions of law and conditions. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.55 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 3. That the development proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development; 4. That the development proposal complies with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which states that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code; 5. That the subject property is currently developed with 18 overnight accommodation units at 64 Bay Esplanade and 3 overnight accommodation units at 566 Bay Esplanade; 6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 16 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 7. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with overnight accommodations and detached dwellings with heights varying between one and three stories, with the surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and detached dwellings; 8. That the height of the proposed building is 52 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 9. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property; BRIAN J. AUNGS'C, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR Hoyt, HADIIU1'ON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILME.MBER CARLEN A. PE'ITRSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" 10. That the development proposal meets the requirements for a termination of status of nonconformity as per Section 6-109 to permit 13 dwelling units where eight units would otherwise be allowed at 64 Bay Esplanade; 11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3-913.A; and 12. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of Section 2-803.C. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That the existing water main within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way is upgraded to the satisfaction of the Fire Department in order to ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes, and that said upgrades are depicted on a revised Grading, Drainage & Utilities Site Plan (sheet 4 of 5) prior to the issuance of a Development Order; 2. That fire flow calculations are provided by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure adequate water supply; 3. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 5. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 6. That all proposed utilities. (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; 12. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 13. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 14. That the proposed gated access is eliminated or that the plans are revised to provide some means by which guests can gain access to the off-street parking area to the satisfaction of Traffic Engineering and Planning Department staff, 15. That the site plan is revised to depict the location of facilities to accommodate recyclables; and 16. That the width of the dumpster staging area is reduced to a size of approximately 7.5 feet. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by September 20, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft64mvclearwater.com. Sincerely, ;?IX, _ Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director 6 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT •W .-. {: POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 LONG RAINGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW September 21, 2005 Mr. Keith E. Zayac 701 Enterprise Road East, Suite 404 Safety Harbor, FL 34695 Re: FLD2005-07065 - 64 Bay Esplanade and 566 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Zayac: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On September 20, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit 21 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to height from 35 feet to 52 feet (to roof deck) with an additional 11 feet for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 19 feet for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), and a reduction to the front (east) setback from 15 feet to zero feet (to pavement) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C., and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity (18 existing overnight accommodation units to be converted to 13 attached dwelling units, where a maximum of eight dwelling units would otherwise be permitted under current Code) under the provisions of Section 6-109. The CDB APPROVED the application based upon the following finding of fact and conclusions of law and conditions. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. That the 0.55 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. That the subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 3. That the development proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development; 4. That the development proposal complies with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which states that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code; 5. That the subject property is currently .developed with 18 overnight accommodation units at 64 Bay Esplanade and 3 overnight accommodation units at 566 Bay Esplanade; 6. That the subject property is permitted a maximum of 16 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 7. That the adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with overnight accommodations and detached dwellings with heights varying between one and three stories, with the surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings, overnight accommodations and detached dwellings; 8. That the height of the proposed building is 52 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 9. That there are no pending Code Enforcement issues with subject property; BRLAN J. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYr HAMIL-1'0N, COUNCIL:MEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMENIBER CARLEN A. PE'I-ERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" ap 10 10. That the development proposal meets the requirements for a termination of status of nonconformity as per Section 6-109 to permit 13 dwelling units where eight units would otherwise be allowed at 64 Bay Esplanade; 11. That the development proposal is consistent with the General Applicability criteria of Section 3-913.A; and 12. That the development proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of Section 2-803.C. Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1. That the existing water main within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way is upgraded to the satisfaction of the Fire Department in order to ensure adequate water supply for fire fighting purposes, and that said upgrades are depicted on a revised Grading, Drainage & Utilities Site Plan (sheet 4 of 5) prior to the issuance of a Development Order; 2. That fire flow calculations are provided by a Fire Protection Engineer in order to ensure adequate water supply; 3. That any/all required Parks and Recreation fees are paid prior to the issuance of a building permit; 4. That any/all required Transportation Impact Fees are paid prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 5. That the final design and color of the building be consistent with the conceptual elevations submitted to (or as modified by) the CDB, and be approved by Staff, 6. That all proposed utilities (from the right-of-way to the proposed building) be placed underground. That conduit for the future undergrounding of existing utilities within the abutting right-of-way shall be installed along the entire site's street frontages prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant's representative shall coordinate the size and number of conduits with all affected utility providers (electric, phone, cable, etc.), with the exact location, size and number of conduits to be approved by the applicant's engineer and the City's Engineering Department prior to the commencement of work; 7. That all Fire Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 8. That all Traffic Department requirements be met, prior to the issuance of any permits; 9. That all signage meet the requirements of Code and be limited to attached signs on the canopies or attached directly to the building and be architecturally-integrated with the design of the building with regard to proportion, color, material and finish as part of a final sign package submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of any permits which includes: a. All signs fully dimensioned and coordinated in terms of including the same color and font style and size; and b. All signs be constructed of the highest quality materials which are coordinated with the colors, materials and architectural style of the building; 10. That a right-of-way permit be secured prior to any work performed in the public right-of-way; 11. That the first building permit be applied for within one year (by September 20, 2006) of Community Development Board approval; 12. That the final Certificate of Occupancy be obtained within two years of issuance of the first building permit; 13. That all utility equipment including but not limited to wireless communication facilities, electrical and water meters, etc. be screened from view and/or painted to match the building to which they are attached, as applicable prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy; 14. That the proposed gated access is eliminated or that the plans are revised to provide some means by which guests can gain access to the off-street parking area to the satisfaction of Traffic Engineering and Planning Department staff, 15. That the site plan is revised to depict the location of facilities to accommodate recyclables; and 16. That the width of the dumpster staging area is reduced to a size of approximately 7.5 feet. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one year of Flexible Development approval (by September 20, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained X within two years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.13. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on October 4, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(d),mvclearwater.com. Sincerely, ;?M Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director DEL MAR DEVELOPMENT LLC CITY OF CLEARWATER i 07/07/05 6141 600.00 MADISON BANK 600.00 TO REORDER CHECKS PLEASE CALL PRINT 62 AT 845-782-5832 OR VISIT US AT W W W.PRINTEZ.COM