The URL can be used to link to this page

FLD2005-05044 U 0i2M5 PL?wi G17:Y & ?Ca ?3 JI FLD2005-05044 629 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 05/24/2005 M3B DEVELOPMENT, LLC ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A O R I G I N A L PLANNER OF RECORD: R T yip J? UL - 8 2005 CLWCoverSheet PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C?-" ?E CLEARWATER Planning Depant 0 100 South Myrtle Avenue earwater Clearwater, Florida 33756 ?- Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 ? SUBMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION ? SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans L??oS ? SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE $ CASE #?` DATE RECEIVED: RECEIVED BY (staff initials): ATLAS PAGE #: ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES: NORTH: SOUTH: WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: M ?p F_x)r_ .O PMENt" L. L.C. MAILING ADDRESS: fO(ti? D IV R NA2R1s0A.1 Ode- , C FL. 3 5 755 PHONE NUMBER: 16 T - 0 730 FAX NUMBER: C AZ) q6 -1 -® -7 3X PROPERTY OWNER(S): -M? (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME: -Rober* ? F=MS MAILING ADDRESS: /860 /J. 7f . //A(&2 ?D ROr., `nLw n\. .;i37, 5- y? - O 3y FAX NUMBER: 02?) PHONE NUMBER: rTa7 CELL NUMBER: ) 6501 " C7 ? yoZ E-MAIL ADDRESS: ???r IS? ? ?ICj L y C0 M B. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) STREET ADDRESS of. subject site: 629,636-f 65-7 f? Y J?E5c"t,4-Nkb E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE /9T774G+1F_6 ` rt 5X14XaJI- 1 (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) PARCEL NUMBER: E <)TY)q@HE?' r i xAM-r zTT 2 PARCEL SIZE: 0 614-1 iac-mss T Q901/96. 90 (acres, square feet) n PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 020 -oA1U0MS?U? u?'1 I. pirTS OVEP44156 -Zf_ OF (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) APPROXIwITE(.Y 30CO .sI. IRK- . / utis:cr. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S):' _r0 )9LLOE.3 ' A A / fE'X f/T- OF 8UjC-J?-"rk;(A T® Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) F2am 93.F E To lDP or- Fc..ny- pzoc ?EcK. A RE0aC,r,L m car- ,G4)lZ roa- (60f_ bL°. d .20?'Q" A Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City.of Clearwater Now DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREV SLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) ROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) D. RITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. THSS ? U?I,OFt?tf..?(" MPFrs fu, "rH£ Df?tyO?S C?2Tfr12 G!? Fo2 7V& 8q-rcb,x ? 1r56L(7 EKCE-pr rw a. 74 F- 144 - -T# F- 1ES4ur f? CC JD -1-S J--J kf;F-9PJAJ4 wrV1 ESL T?F? ?'C&r?ii'iLY ?Ptac?sil? DEU ?P?Nri .Ti..> Ti?1S ??1??'-i", 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. Ttfrc- )E>EvELO Prv",r Pro PcLiE.b Se-r TMf. SIr?WbA KD -S A i 4>l1 i? ?E i' D.L' nSGp(tlLA[.? O'??d?lL or*a& Pmo-3Ee-r.1 ZN TfM AQC4 ANA L?r-1-L 01V0-' Pa-PeQrc-aS -0 81- OF-UP-LOP,66 wr A NANAO'CrL Afba U'VbUSraC TO -Pb&-f Caw, 6EACIt 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. I?U?nE T*fZ S Eg p ormar4 r- of TFErS Ao - uwsr Cati+ye , Tr{{ iya;r?rFl3caraR6iocJ 1tisL?. PoEtois&, Mears P.?Sti»rr.4c, LIS TYC- Cogerma ct41, FOE(- OF -rhv-- ut- a !, iA&jrt- fta"rnii- ezi4etFx -nmr -rs TftBQE NOW, -Ain Sn/'Oova: THE 5;iWF-741. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. WxrM -Tdia- 2EDt,tcrro" A) uN--rs 'Elza -I 6'ta--?"a,D. 19A16 "Titf CdRInA£ 6L2? r eA yAL.CT2AafSTE,,5r) 7D CoNbonxAi 4m -, %(Lf+EPfe CouNTS WX1,L f,3E VFEb"C'66- 17" AObino? a 7N?F wr«- Nm c.or.aG&? 3G Fnut,&?AR.? ?f}(ICSNG?y Sur 1 NF.A>uS ac s.?4aESl/EyaFSS. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. Tars MtALTt- >GAMXLY COMPLEX .2S coNsssrE,,vr WJ:rµ bf-ft-ER DEtirsrrY C?e?tPA?AQfrE ;aROPE2'rT?S ?TEF- ?XSSTSNC? ?Ez?Cx DEV£LOP?D 7?N,? 6?+=?i Pc-?+?v?£Dh 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. W.rrw 7u-F- FJFw?+r dF -r+iF- PRolbab BarLbrAya' T-of 9ESU" 4LLDL ?s fog Scrraac-S om Tf£ sibaS wsrH IVo OtFQi?f;i'so?U1 RE04Esrc%Hr< C4Z:EtWrA 5Fr Fo2rl+ r-j T/f£ bES1(,M Srb s Rf2j6:- MlEf roR T;V& Mo%i- etl? 15'rcepr- Fon- 111{. '4w4 17wL BECK r'2 .T 'S . :&CA Isr. TNzS TS X)0-1 4 ?MHk2cr?9t DEU.. T1*ffZE vtu. ,-XE A,10 Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which, the. waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail; -- - SE? QrrRCf E Ns9?t- V ? 1: ;l It 11 Fi 9 . - I..? PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater „? E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance w the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exempti to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. f? At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures, _ All adjacent. streets and municipal storm systems; _ Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. O' COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LLTTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL / (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable M Acknowle gement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): 77Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. F. SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) (SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; a-, TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and, ithin 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) -please design around the existing trees; La/LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; ? PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in accordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; O GRADING PLAN, as applicable; O PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); O COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; n r, G. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ?' I L p SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): I I All dimensions; North arrow; JJL 8 2005 - _ Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; L_ . ?._ .. _.. Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; SERVICES _ All required setbacks: C!; CLEARWATE'1--l _ All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; ^ P1 1I L 1 A I , aU..? v, v , .......,... ,.,. ..............?....rr Location of all public and private eas?ts; • Location of all street rights-of-way witYl}Trand adjacent to the site: Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment a epv re i sc. a in( Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); Location of all landscape material; Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and " `' {-- °-- ---? Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks- SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; ?----- -•- ---- •-m Number of EXISTING dwelling units; PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; SERVICES . Gross floor area devoted to each use; CLEARWATEf1 Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; ORIGINAL Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. Cl/REDUCED SITE PLAN to'scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: - ?r0ne-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevations if required to evaluate the proposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space areas; Location of all earth or water retaining walls and earth berms; Lot lines and building lines (dimensioned); Streets and drives (dimensioned); Building and structural setbacks (dimensioned); Structural overhangs; Tree Inventory; prepared by a "certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102:A) V/ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/? X 11) (color rendering if possible); C3' IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN SUSTTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-20213) i Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g_ Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part ` of a Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infll Project. C/tY UILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; (g REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. J. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS I Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and. dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) O Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). ? Reduced signage proposal (8 '/2 X 11) (color), if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. K. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNA cknowIJVge that all representations made in this and ac rate to the best of my knowledge and sentativ to visit and photograph the property of property owner orireprese aU4?r DEBORAH CAPONE `• MY COMMISSION # OD249119 EXPIRES: September 11,2007 STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS Sworn to and subscribed beforg? me this ` day of A.D. 20 Cb to me and/or by l f ?7 who is personally known has produced as irianUfinntinn commission expires: Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater - • AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: -F5 9 TSE. ? L .C. C (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names) 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s). and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): 6aq , 655 r0:37 6.4Y 67SP e -'jpaj iF, CL 09"A rC,-L . -FC . 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) pac ik cDa SU0MTTMLj FoR. XO - uN-f CONi»+` LAJ1caIP11 W: TW q- /•-{'T: O; ' F/i.OH 6f-? 7D lL-oG bC-CK, ?Nn ?_y ?? S?rf1R?C e6 f7aA?, jorUr% /?6?.j2 jgk&eRri-' Lr.Ur 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: SAS Z, V.,P MSI& beV• L (?C as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act o the above, described property; 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order It p cess th ppli ion and a owner authorizes City representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; 6. That (11we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true d orrect Propertner Property ner Property Owner Property Owner STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS B fore me the undersigned, an officer duly commissione y the laws f t e State?/?f Florida, on this / day of o personally appeared ?>Lrt- f" Ai/o// who having been first duly sworn e ses and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she d LVI),4 IfWA'o-w ta b r? My Commission Expires: DEBORAH CAPONE AIA14,gSinN it 171171945111 _•` _= EXPIRES: September11,2007 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters SAPlanning DepartmentlApplication Formsldevelopment reviewlllexible development application 2005.doc ORIGINAL ,r JUL -8 i ^INING & DEVELOPMENT O r- iV!CES Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater ,: ;WATF'i i EXHIBIT I LEGAL. DESCRIPTION • LOTS 8,9, 10 AND 11, BLOCK 78, UNIT NO. S MANDALAY REPLAT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. ORIGINAL J UL 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES j CI-.Y OF CLEARWATEF-1 E EXHIBIT 2 PARCEL I.D. Ws 05/29/15/54756/078/0080 05/29/15/54756/078/0090 05/29/15/54756/078/0100 05/29/15/54756/078/0110 U ORIGINAL EUU?UU I ?I "JL - 8 200 ! J PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT I SERVICES CI-A' OF CLEARWATElk • EXHIBIT 3 APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES • Our requests in this "Flexibility Development Application", consist of two items. This property is located in the "Tourist District". The rear Setback for a Level two permit would be in a range of 10 - 20 feet. Even though we were able to fit the Building well within this criteria, it became necessary for the Pool and Deck to encroach to 3.33' of the rear Property line. We feel that since this is the only Setback Req't for which we are requesting relief, and this is a situation where relief is commonly granted, we graciously request the same. The other item for which request relief is in the Height The range of 35 -100 ft. is given in this district for a Level two review. We are requesting a Height of 58' from B.F.E. to the flat roof deck. In consideration of the Setbacks to the sides' that we strictly adhered too, and the variances in Height that have been granted to other Developments in this area, we feel that this too is a relief that can be granted. Please see attached a hi-lited map clearly depicting variances given, within our area, over the last few years. This project is located in the "Old Florida District" of "Beach by Design". In referencing "Beach By Design", this project would meet certain criteria's as a transition project. To the South are the High rises of "Belle Harbor", to the Vilest at the Beach are the "Ambiance on White Sands (69.5')", and "12 ldelwild (66.42'). This project would be a mid-rise building shorter than those mentioned above. Immediately to the North is "Nepenthe Condos (59')", a project just recently granted approval. We believe that we fulfill the reference made to Densities. Beach by Design says; " Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements". Currently, there are 23 rental units on the property, we are proposing only 20 units. In addition, Beach by Design states "that this District favors Residential more than any other parts of Clearwater Beach". Here again we are replacing a commercial development with a residential development. There is no question that the Development we are requesting will be a great improvement to the area. Removing all the car parking and asphalt in the Boulevard, and replacing it with proper Landscaping, and relocating all the parking under the building, shielded from view may be the greatest accomplishment for the neighborhood. SITE DATA wserr ur /a• w N rrY? evx Iwo wLM•' On. uw•ewe A sm i naar wm O om runt ¦ WN am l4 am xNM am% Yt ou"m wvr. C MAWM su nwww W.M n w•a• teem w etw w n wlm met Pe r Wes an. iw w,w awsw aorr a+a sass wtm w s - w ss 7Yr e wrrow W •a an naa wYOS-r e.r s ewr vwp ? . I Y . w• eI wa, nc vmu t . t e . w w LEGEND F %mom R" • Rmftl ?¦ ffiawx ¦ ¦ONUU m • ¦n= w trs sus FREES =aftw w••suee w wel7a ws NOTE ?Ae{e1}e1m?MiM1L ? R A a L/OeIO ? n? NOTE, :-M. wm mum r aR ereo w w. Imm w awe.6. wm NOTEi a? wwwew m a wnr? r w ssvwt Aa w c•w.serar a N.• w NOTE rL r?wss cease Mt m s wm uoora• n ssna WRI KTIL W Z dl H ? }- a. L4j Z¢ H LL W A Z '-i W Qw Qs t SITE PLAN MT.S. -D z ® z to / Q j C - mr< ? ill ' ' ?.., r=te Waa ? ?`..-% f _• M -.: 7 . :?' _ y ? d } 7 -L Y/*rx I'il - j r? L. 1?1fMr1?•.iw Iw?glpl?•.?Nlf 1map Q Q ®Q Q !? ---.i.wti Cl ism ?G D 0 map LML --- a- 11 IL- M z H SOUTHERN ELEVATION WESTERN ELEVATION ? Y xTS &TA Z¢ LL- .....?.•..w.. w...r.-..... W A 7 H K? ?A L• Z ® w • +r w w w w w z ?? J NOWMERN ELEVATION EASMN ELEVAT ON y po r KTS, XTA CD II i i? r WRITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ORIGINAL General Applicability Criteria: PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES _ CI -.-Y OF CLEARWATF 1) The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (COMPREHENSIVE INFILL REDEVELOPMENT PROD CEAV M313 Development 629 Bay Esplanade JUL U JUL 8 2005 Section D. Written Submittal Requirements The scale of the proposed condominium project is in harmony with recently approved developments along Clearwater Beach, and specifically, in the "Old Florida District", including the Nepenthe project located immediately to the north of the subject property. The project meets the Design Guidelines set forth in Division 5 of Article 3, of Beach by Design. Please refer to the detailed discussion of this criterion in response to Comprehensive Infill Criteria No. 10. 2) The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. This proposed development will meet the standards already set by other approved projects in the area, and will only encourage other properties to be developed in a manner more conducive to today's Clearwater Beach. 3) The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. With the development of this 20-unit condo, the neighborhood will become more residential versus the commercial feel of the transient 23-unit rental complex that currently exists on the Property. This change in use will improve the safety of the community. 4) The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. With the reduction in units from 23to 20, and the change from rental (transient) to condominium, traffic counts will be reduced. In addition, there will no longer be "Boulevard" parking; rather, there will be 1 means of ingress and egress. 5) The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The Property is located within the "Old Florida District" of Clearwater Beach. Several condominium projects have recently been approved in the "Old Florida District" of Clearwater Beach with height and density comparable to that of the proposed development. Accordingly, the proposed development is consistent with the changing community character of the "Old Florida District". In addition, the density of the proposed project is consistent with the existing community character. Therefore, similar to the other projects approved in the "Old Florida District, the proposed project is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity. 6) The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent properties. With the height of the proposed building, the design allows for setbacks on the sides, with no reductions requested. The proposed development complies with the criteria set forth in the design standards, with the exception of the height interpretation and pool deck setback requirements. Because this is "not" a commercial development, there will be no hours of operation problems. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project Criteria: 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Due to the size and shape of the Property, the two requests were made. For the highest and best use of this land, without fully covering the parcel, the request for the extra floor level and additional height is within reason. The additional height will allow a significant increase in open space on the parcel and will permit superior architectural design. The project meets or exceeds many of the City's development criteria, including but not limited to, parking, open space and setback requirements. The deviation requested with regard to the pool setback is minimal and consistent with the historical development in the immediate area. As a result of the building's shape, the proposed placement of the pool is essential. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties. (Include the existing value of the site and the proposed value of the site with the improvements.) Not only will this "Upscale" condominium project not reduce the Fair Market value of the surrounding properties, it will actually greatly increase the surrounding property values by cleaning up the unsightly neighborhood. This property is currently almost completely covered by asphalt, and as is nothing more than inexpensive transient rental units. Its' replacement is a Multi-million dollar condo project, with lush landscaping and attractive architecture. ORIGINAL 2 ,rt 0 9 In granting the requests made, the flexibility in standards will add to the style, elegance, and overall value of the community of Clearwater Beach, the "Old Florida District" of Clearwater Beach and Bay Esplanade. The proposed development has been designed to match the style of Buildings that have been accepted for Development throughout the City of Clearwater, and which is now currently setting the standard for style in Pinellas County. As previously discussed, the additional height will allow a significant increase in open space on the parcel, will eliminate "Boulevard parking", and will permit superior architectural design. The proposed height is in keeping with other approved projects in the "Old Florida District' and will similarly add to the character of the community. 9. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of parcel proposed for development. In reviewing Division 14 of Article 3, we have 37 Parking spaces for 20 units. According to the "Shared Parking Formula" we have adequate parking. 10. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District or Downtown District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3 (as applicable). This project complies with the design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. The Property is located in the "Old Florida District" of "Beach by Design". In referencing "Beach by Design", the proposed project is a transition project. To the South are the High rises of "Belle Harbor", to the West at the Beach are the "Ambiance on White Sands (69.6)", and "12 Idelwild (66.42'). The proposed project is a mid-rise building shorter than those mentioned above. Immediately to the North is "Nepenthe Condos (59')", a project just recently granted approval. The project is consistent with the reference made to Densities. Beach by Design states: "Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements". Currently, there are 23 rental units on the property; we are proposing only 20 units. In addition, Beach by Design states "that this District favors Residential more than any other parts of Clearwater Beach". Here again we are replacing a commercial development with a residential development. The proposed project will be a great improvement to the area in that it will remove all of the car parking and asphalt in the Boulevard, and replace it with proper Landscaping. The parking will be relocated under the building, shielded from view, which is a tremendous benefit to the neighborhood. In addition, the proposed project will significantly increase the open space on the Property, which is a benefit to the environment and the community. 46254.110168 #349637 v1 - Szasz--application responses 4 ORIGINAL W/Play/17005 09:00 PT FROM: R a JERK 14155 TO: Peter Mero l i • PAGE: 00771 h.Fr' ;? , JENNINGS, jc)Ii irY , ANT) I'h.?n„s c: jt*rtrt?n_;!B lTl Nlay l S, 2005 Cleamra.ter Zo. ivig. and Plarmiag Board Q NN'-H.0.NM% IT MI LA.Y CX-)NCF..R N: Attached. to this letter =..s the that).: fez' i.nstiutrlez?ts T,laCi_n.? t}ae }?ropezty listed in the t?:a?7 e of TseTse, LLC. Cordially, REPK A, & TENN1_NGS; P.A. Th om.as C. J ermi ]gs 11.1 ';ID ECE ? 1 ,„ _ g 2005 ?? ? PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES -`? CLEARWAT 7R ^aralc?stl -0.3 ('gt![l i_tC?r"atec}lo[ittw.1.±",'?C.•5jCtI 1 1?_ (i,'.•.il ;'ll•4556 + PA?:: (727) 46-,1.-2919 + .orn g,n>. 0 R I G I ' t A Fl h r.mcr tte[ ?. Ft; May: <'3if? W09 f'T FEW r :A ?? JENNINt, TO: PPt.er Mcroli . PAW R03 KARLEFN F OF: BLAKf`'!j, CLERK or- COURT PNELLAS COUNTY FI-ORIDA !NSTK 204475.0637 p3l09.f2pflA ?( OU:17 A. At (?Fr. RF(; BK.: 19817 PG: 2141,710? 4oc7ypcUCE0 REGOROING. $18.5(1 D OOG STAMR: $10600.00 ORIGINAL This ln;irirr;:ent Prepared 'ay: -,nd Return, to' REPKA & JENNINGS, P,A 03 Court Street 0,»F ,-- .?0 7 G!earwater, Florida File Nlo. 1043.25 WARRANTY DEED ! `? ca li U iL - 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C`: CL.EARWATER THIS INDENTURE mn; )df; this ;,0 clay of June, 2004 betrvveen P-T PJICR.C:i_l i cincf{e ersarwfhose Post Office .plc cress 9r7 FIclc>rado ?Iearwater Beach, F!._ 1337 fi?er .inafter callers the Grantor nrd SE ,T SE LU irA-iose Post Office Ad(1ress is r , ` (? ?f n .rye E.:(?`_ L_? ?,-sf, hereinafter c;llied the Grantee. That the Grantor, for grid in consideral,ion of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), a,tri other good and valuable considerations to said Granters irr, hand paid by said Grantees. tyre receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged. by these ctre3ents does grant, bargain, sell. riien. rernrse, release. convey a.nd confirm unto the said Grantee, and Grantees heirs, sllc:ce scrs and assigns foru:ver, the following described proper'Ly situate, lying and being in PinFlitas County, Florida, to-wit'. Lot J Block ar.data ` i he isle o` a ThouSatld Palr,rs" Clearwater Beach Unit No. 5, accorclin to the rnal? or Plat therer,f as tecorded in plat Book 20, Page(s) 27, Public f;ecords of Pinellas County, Florida, also described as: From the Northwest corner iaf clock 71, of Mandalay it hr; isle of a Thousand Palms" Clearwater Beach Unit No. 5, rirn alnnil curie to the left and alonq Southwesterly boundarryy of said block chord bearrn 822 deg.32'24," F, chord eqU it ^ 03.92 feet; length of arc 105 fleet, radius 2 19 feet. thence along the same CLINP_ to the left and the same boundary of Said block, chord bearinra S47 cleg.4344" E, chord equal 79.52 feet, lenyth of arc 80 feet, radius 219 feet, thence along same cyrvet to the left, and the same boundary of said block chord bearit'T 370 deg 2519" E, chord equal 85.39 feet length of arc Lit? 'feet, radius 10 fret, t}ience along sarYre curve to the left, and the same boundary of said black: chord bearing S86 deU 04'41" E, chord equal 2.8.74 feet, length of arc 2A.7G feeet, radius 2,V feet, feet, thence East 51.20 Feet, for point of beginning thPrtce East alcmg, Said' ho.undary Fib feet, thence N 4 deg. 13''31" E- f10.30 feet to !.NE; North Boundary of said block, thence Wes= aloe point of beginning. together with hoth upland and submergged land within the aforesaid b6tlndary lines, together with all riparian rigli s thereunto appertainrrr and belonging. AND Lot 8 block 78, Mancia3lav "The Isle of a "Thnusand Pairna" Clearwater Beach Unit No. 5, according to the map or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page(s) 27, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida. Tax Asses:;nr's Parc141 Number: 0512W15154756/078/0090 05/29/15154756/078'0080 18!Ma;/ N1F1 f1Q:P9 PT FROM: R* & JEiM11I GS TO: Peter Merol i PACE: HUI ORIGINAL "ax I.D. Nurnber of Grano F:(s): 20-018874 E/F'*WE[' ?.. .11iD 82005 ;1 PLANNIiti'S & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES - ''I FARINA- TI !I GODJ\M_YANGE: 1,5 NOT THE HOMESTI=AD OF TFIE GRANTOR.. S1.1t3JEC; to easements. restrictions and reservations of record and taxes for' thc, ccn-rent year ?jnd subsequent years. TOGETHER. with all the tenrnents, hPreditaments r-jnd appr-!ilenances thereto b0onging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the sAMC in fee siqrplc:,?, j,r-ever AND SAID GRANTOR hereby covenants with said Grantee that he is ia"Itilly ai:ized of said land in fee simple; he has good. right and Iavyful authority to sell and convey said land; that he hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomaoever, and that said land is free of all eni-.umbrances. "Grantor" and "Grantee- are r.r3e.d for singular or plural, as context re'{ui1_0S. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the S;;1d executod in their names the clay ;and year f SIGN p B?1: SI nnt 5igr,- Print. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PINEI_t_AS ,.IV tor, have caused these p .song, to be hove written. / I a slnqi? person I hereby cE rtify that on this day personalli appeared before we an officer duly authorized to ad ?ls ?oaths and take ar knraw edgments, PETER M?:ROLI, a single w ne to be the indivldUal described herein (or i?erson, tom ersonally:?l:.riuvNn and known to ho prorJuc?d - --° ---'as identificationwho took an oath and who acknowle. ged hit N ;;hs FLFTiP.n . was eely and voluntarily executod for the purposes herein expressed: WITNE,SS my hand and official seal Jr;Yi.fl S. bt.SKlta - ' f:ornmf/ GOG23H:+?6 t ??9?tr.?^ F'tU(n1L S 7l2?tiL07 ::. F1004* Notary Read.. M4 t!'lis ` -i day of .lune 2fi04r„ My Commission Expires: t It;S :ic;<U9 .) it. nlepazed KARLEEN F. PEE ULAKCER CLERK OF COURT C;ltt:?sti r? Yt tgt7StS??ll-}??i_?C° PINFLLAS CO f FLORIDA i n i:ct '''j3.ite ,I? fs a^k i P.A WISTH 2004191491 06!0'=22004 at 0" PM r gf 1 Stliie i7?t? O F REG'SK. 1354.1 PG: 2496-2397 (i t f,-z,1r, DocTypeZEED RECORDING. x3- W T.-lmi?a, Fto?da --?Eit)? D ©OC STAMP: $115E90 EcM Pape,, Boor: StLeet ORIGINAL ? (( r.:1 !iox L3b?? 337 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES t II I'`TF•RA_4._WARRANT 'k QI,? ?3 Cj-v ? E CLEARWATER ''H 1.ATES 1, +G 4ri, J.A, V'At::'1T'f;.?;T?, made titc 30 clay of .f?A1?ri, 2004abalt?Ocompany id a Florida CoTlo:raiion. i"Gtalltclr"?; to ?:? I???,? ?{ r4Florida ??ri??dca3 15 ? _ l,'Jnov, `lo$'t lft,l.Ct c.C1.dmJ4 IS 'W t.TNLS8E t' H: and othoi Rood and valuable t.ll?:t tl]t= Ci£?tTtCtl_ d '.P. ti.(?T1..idl.j'ai1.Q77 of the sum of $10,0,0 raz?.t 1}%ll"6alli,, Se:II., ai;1(l G 1- r coiI?ideratiotl., the receipt of which Is eb eas cc::lve}? kno3lac?gsd?ao the fc I'1? x, ng d?sci b??c1 land In unto the C?=i'?tT?tG and Ut?,. ,-je n.i li.F',t i:t} County, Fkmda-. the '?J3t tllt:rt;ot? rt of Black 7S. ; 11 x 1?O. 5 ',M Ai?(>7/'?LAY P,UTLAT, accordit?- to t1 as i.at t0 and. Lot 11, Block 7S, r a. rec:?i dc'd in F' ?at Book- U, Page 48, wl?iclt was f()rierly ..awn *•N?.?,!_:AY "THF_. ISLE OF A THOUSAND PALMS" CL 1~ AR a j T ER BE.t.A z H UNIT N O1 TM. . t . ! actg.; rding to t.Ile plat th:v-..of rec;c? ded it) Plat Book 0, Page 2- Z ax Parcci M #05/29/15/54756,/(V/';/01 OC? T'OCIET'B.ER',vi:th al.l the. tengr3etlis, h,ereditam::nts, and appc-Irt.ecla'aces il,:;t:et.o. TO II AVE A10) TO HOLD the same unto Grantee and rJ.'FJitce,='5 Sacccsso:r.S and a ssig gns 'kin c ordinatlces, nrat,tet's apl?eartl?.g 11.1. itl?}- . This cor,???~ysz;c>;: is. t?2aclc> subleGt tip applcat?le z ?1)3rg t•ecOrded.131.at of the land; and taxes foT tac, ckirreiJt and sttbsecluent Leaks. ?,Pir..ed chi A ltd the ?t'a1-ltor does hereby ? veziar?E. o` t.l i ?ht that ib.c Grantor is lawful a t ority t:?a sell t.l?d col>>'e;` said pl'eir. ises ill f?c sltZ7iJlt'.; that tt?c Grantor has g b l erlcurabrarlces except as tloted above- t11at i,es; t11at tile title to the premises is h:ee zr.?rt. al the p:etxl ,1 •antee W ill have quiet possessloil; arc; that il.1t: tGralAtot" bereb l1 ? p ,e?c) ?s ? Iuattts tev :r. te j? Pt las .t: t pr.„l;lises and ?IUi.II. defend °•.11e. sat7le agalllSt. th.1a?? S1. c alTns of ncYtt td' above. ,• ?-• -?- (- ?a_iac?' ,l:as e,..eci ?r'. ?, ?i?F;( T?.t: tl;ty 4T1C . ???+;?:i;. =?:aier? a:}Ci tiel;??crcd ,a lojidu Qi :QS: i{]U;1 By,- ?.ctdres;, ?Q 1. Li<fy ':spy +nar?e I A " 1104, -IV i i2e t11'E '?IT1SZ ?RStil ?1';GPii: \? aS ilC1-Ilo'?4odged bcfo c 1111, till:; 15 ' of Ca A \r IN-- Gt]i?3Qf' ctlQTl, Jfl E}~i7:'clif l?i. t?lf co )Qf'c'.t?01?. h? ?5?2C 15 })EISi)111.1lti'?iIZOWi7 f0 i}1[ (tf has prod i?Gf'` Id !'I Jh. _ (\tiOt al-v Public.) '?..` (. OT.?'tlll:SSinTI i X.4)1CE'.S: ?i UUU?U[? p ' - 8 2005 PLANNIN I & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI .- )F CL.EARWATER ORIGINAL 0. - V0 7 74512'x1 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PII,4ELL A.S • FEr AFFIl) .: VI.T BEFORE N F, the urldusigned authotity, personally appeared TH.OMA.S C. JEMJMGS LU.., who after being first duly sworn.,wid, who is perso"Al.ly known to nie d.l.d. state as follows: 1. Affiant is art attorac-,y at law, who practices in the area o real estate with the. firm of Repka leaua419s:, P. A., 703 Court. Street, Cloarwa.ter. FL 33756 and is a member of The Florida Aar. 2. Affiant has personal knowledge that th4 properties set forth or Composite-, ".A." are titled in the came offSE TSE LLC. 3. Further .A.f..fi:ant sayeth not v 1. l? - TIiMd-A S C. JENNINGJS III \J WITNESS my hand and official at Clearwater, Pi.neU.as County, Florid:?, this ? _ day of May, 2005, f Tvt7. A Y' PUBt-IC kfY COMMISSION FXPU-,F-S: JOYGF S. BASIC!N ,ybjflPK Commt? Doo77F9a(. ! ti k-PIMA 1112112007 *wM1' 00nelo6 Ihrv 1600,W:1242W irn.r•'/ ........ FIo.1 Nola//yy Avon.. Ing 8 2005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES i I Cl- N' CLEARWATER ORIGINAL r • REPKA & JENNINGS, I-.A_ AT"1 RNI IYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW Thomas C- jv-nnings III May 17, 2005 Clearwater Zoning and Planning Board TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Joyce S. Kaskin Parale it Attached to this letter is the Resolution of TseTse, LLC authorizing Peter Meroli to sign for actions before this Board. Cordially, REPKA & JENNINGS, P.A. Thomas C. Jennings III s 2005 , PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI-.Y OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL 70:> Coup Srrrei - Cte.?revater, Florida 3 X756-5507 7FL: (T7) 4 {1.4550 - rAX: (727) 461-2919 - jennin, 4inrnec.uer Z00 :39Hd ilnaaW as}ad :OZ s9NINN3f 2 HHd3II :WUHd Id 002T SBBZ/fiPW/U C? 17/M,19/Z005 11:49 PDT FROM: OR A JENNINGS TO: Peter Meroli • PAGE: 002 Resolution to Authorize WHEREAS, this Limited Liability Company desiring to petition the Clearwater Planning and Development Board, be it: RESOLVED, that the proper member of this Entity (i.e- Peter Meroli) is hereby authorized to sign, execute and present any and all matters, for and in behalf of this Limited Liability Company regarding any petition or matter before the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Board and is hereby authorized and directed to sign any documents required by The City of Clearwater to carry out the provisions of this resolution. The undersigned hereby certifies that he/she is the duly elected and qualified Secretary and the custodian' of the books and records and seal of TseTse, LLC, a limited liability company duly formed pursuant to the laws of the state of Florida and that the foregoing is a true record of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of the Directors and that said meeting was held in accordance with state law and the Bylaws of the above-named Corporation on May 17, 2005, and that said resolution is now in full force and effect without modification or rescission. IN WITNESS WH Sec EOF, I have executed my name as Secretary of the Liability Company this 17th day of May, 2005. G: 4PM 104 .1 s\ReAr ion to Authorize Borroxvig on a Line of Cre(ht.wpd r. ..J I. 82005 PLANNIN;a & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C'--, OF CLEARWATER ORIGINAL d i David F Ramsey, P E- P S M R&S Engineering and Construction Corporation 434 Skinner Boulevard 61 Glen Boulevard Dunedin, F134698 Banner Elk, NC 28604 Fax 775 871-3812 webpage: www-ramseyengineering.com 727 734-7020 e-mail enaineernllc.net 828 963-5875 Professional Engineer Ohio-Oregon-Florida-N Carolina-S Carolina-Georgia-Tennessee Professional Surveyor Ohio-Florida-N Carolina General Contractor Class A Florida CGC 010310 North Carolina 44555 Please reply to Florida Address May 23, 2005 Richard M Alt, P E Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, F133637-6759 RE: Venetian Pointe Clearwater, Fl Dear Richard: Enclosed you will find a request for an exemption for the aforementioned project. Attached you will find the Permit Inquiry Checklist, Final Site Plan, Aerial Photograph, Soil Conservation Service Map and Copy of the Certificate of Title and Power of Attorney for the property. Please approve at your earliest possible convenience. Sincerely, David F Ramsey, P E, PSM r.... IrII f\?r? I-?- -- 8 2005 j PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 CI-OF CLEARWATErR ORIGINAL s PERMIT INQUIRY CHECKLIST Land Owner(s) Representative's Name: Steve SZas7 Company Name: A13B Development, LLC Address: 1360 N Ft Harrison Ave, Clearwater-, Ft 33755 Phonetk 727 467-0730 Venetian Pointe . Project Name: County: Pinellas 3. Please label the following items in square feet: Existing Conditions: Building, Sidewalk; etc.' 9,476.91 SF Vehicular Use: 9.999.12 SF Grass, Open Area: 10,020.87 SF Grass, Open Area.: 11,300.67 SF O Submit a brief narrative describing the proposed construction activities. Renlace Existing Buildings with New Construction of Condo Submit au aerial photograph with the project area (proposed construction area) acid total land area (total land area of ownership) delineated. Attached o Submit detailed construction drawings to clearly illustrate the proposed construction aetivit:,I-. Site Plan Attached o Are there any wetlands in or adjacent to the project area? If so, please contact Alberto Martinez, Environmenial Scientist Manager, at (813) 985-7481, extension 2007, to discuss your project. No Wetland on Property o Other useful documentation to expedite your permit inquiry review includes the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) soil survey and the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FEMA) with the project boundary delineated on each. Attached O Please mail to: Richard M. Alt, P.E. Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, FL 33637-6759 D -- 8 2005 j PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT . SERVICES I r' )c CLEARWATER C? Agent (If Different from Land Owner) Representative's Name: David F Ramsey Company Name: R and S Engineering and Construction Corporation Address: 434 Skinner Boulevard, Dunedin, F134698 Phone: 727 734-7020 S ecfl'wp/ Rge : 05/29/15 Proposed (' onditions: Building, Sidewalk, etc.: 14,613.14 SF Vehic:uler Use: 3,033.09 SF ORIGINAL Pinellas County Property Appraisettb.rnnatzoi.1: U? 29 l> -)4/-)0 U // UU /U. rage i of Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information 1Vl I ?J ,,. . -82005 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C1-„ OF CLEARWATER I,,lcl< to Search Pas*e: o R o G I N A n e-planation of this screen littp_//pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/1-itbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=I &b=1 &c=1 &r=_ 12&s=1 &t3=1 &u=O&p... 5/23/2005 9 M3[3 DEVELOPMENT ?LIc. July 6, 2004 Mr. Mark Parry Planner City of Clearwater Re: FLD 2005-05044,629 Bay Esplanade Resubmittal per DRC comments for CDB meeting. Dear Mark; Please accept this full package of 15 sets of revised plans per DRC comments of June 30, 2005. General Engineering: 1. Issue of Solid waste vehicle solved at meeting. Fire: 1. - 6. We accept and acknowledge all of Fire's comments. Landscaping: 1. Please find attached a plan at 20 Scale. Traffic Engineering: 1. Handicap parking has been modified. Planning: 1. Acknowledge and accept. 3. Roof will be used for the A.C. equipment of the units below. 4. The existing Docks are to remain, no plans have been made for changes at this time. 5. -10. All changes have been made per Staffs request. Please find attached full set of Applicability req't's narratives' etc.. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Yours Truly; ORIGINAL Kobe z Vice P 7esident JUL - 8 2005 i PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CI-7-Y OF CL.EARWATER 1860 N. Ft. Harrison Ave., Clearwater FL 33755 Tel: (727) 467-0730, 467-0731 Fax: (727) 467-0732 Chalets on White Sands r ! ---- -- Acacia St. - l ` ' 75 condos 56' in height ._---- __-- -- - - T - - -- --- _-- --'- - '' Ocean Breeze i u 14 condos 42.67' in height i ----- ' Chateau on White Sands - -_- '• / _ 13 condos i 61 66' in hei ht c^ c+ - . g - t '; -- - ---S_Qme rseLSI. --- - -- - -- i 23 Cambria i ;I i ?ei ? .-------- Q '- -------- . ----._ -_.._-- -- ----- i L -- . __ N I a Risa condos --- 1 2 townhome units 35' in height .__ . -C?-+mbrJa-SL-- (n - CD --- - 28 condos 69.5' in height I ------- - - - - - - - D - ---- _ _ < CD z La Risa 11 4 condos II --- - 1 51.83'in.height ' ? - ? 12 Idlewild ? --- ---- ----- - -? ? Nepenthe Condos 14 condos -}??----- --? _..----- 5 condos 66.42' in height - R-yal Way - - - j 59' in height Mor 33 - 74.6 ai height I. eTvyooa ?:.- CL _ _ -Q Ampiance On White Sands 13 - -- - - ! ----- `< Poinsetta Place condos 69.5' in height- TJ _ _ --. D1 8 townhomes i /? 37' in height L + --- -- - - - I -- N :- -- -- - ----- (Q - -Ken dcalf -Sf Juanita--W- - ' 0 _ (D ` Q -- -- -- --- --- cD - -- - B.av Esplanade O Legend Projects ?',s `? ,., Approved N -R9Ekaway-St. - ------------ - - Pending On Hold/Incomplete Source: City of Clearwater Planning Department Old Florida District Prepared by: City of Clearwater Planning Department, Mar. 2005 N FLS and FLD- New Construction Projects Since 2001 0 9 min law rte- _ - -- - VENETIAN POINTE SOUT40-H ELEVAT I Oil Y.i U?TK _r 1J f ' 7 2 4 M A- ' / l ? rf ? oP ? '_ .1 .? ? ? - ?{ ^ , ? , •? ? I i ? J , me au ^-i[ \ YIaY ESPLAN4a5- . . LANDSCAPE PLAN VENETIAN POIN1E 4 FLD2005-05044 629 BAY ESPLANADE Date Received: 05/24/2005 M3B DEVELOPMENT, LLC ZONING DISTRICT: T LAND USE: RFH ATLAS PAGE: 258A CLWCoverSheet PLANNER OF RECORD: NOT ENTERED Planning Department 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, Florida 33756 Ck-arwater Telephone: 727-562-4567 Fax: 727-562-4865 of BMIT ORIGINAL SIGNED AND NOTARIZED APPLICATION t] SUBMIT 14 COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION including 1) collated, 2) stapled and 3) folded sets of site plans SUBMIT APPLICATION FEE CASE #: I've -) _ oSegy `/ DATE RECEIVED: '-9_- RECEIVED BY (staff initials): O,r,. 7_ ct-a' ATLAS PAGE #: ZS Z; ZONING DISTRICT: LAND USE CLASSIFICATION: • GX SURROUNDING USES OF ADJACENT F+ PROPERTIES: NORTH: I J SOUTH: Z WEST: EAST: * NOTE: 15 TOTAL SETS OF INFORMATION REQUIRED (APPLICATIONS PLUS SITE PLAN SETS) OR16- 'i ? ? A L FLEXIBLE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (Revised 12/30/2004) PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT- A. APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWNER AND AGENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) APPLICANT NAME: T) 6UE(,OPPg9.0?jt' L L C MAILING ADDRESS: 1860 ?. 'R AIA(ZIZ150ti1 IqtiE CLVd FL. 3 3 7S5 PHONE NUMBER: 027) FAX NUMBER: 0 -7 2 2- PROPERTY OWNER(S): •?J? 1 .SF L • L• (Must include ALL owners as listed on the deed - provide original signature(s) on page 6) AGENT NAME:oberi- 5?as? MAILING ADDRESS: 1860 A). }fAlL2T5 ) / (/E, (2 LW. nz_ PHONE NUMBER: ? aZ7 / "T./i7 - O FAX NUMBER: eZ ) lol - -Q 73Z CELL NUMBER: (7a7) 656 - 8 -7 yZ E-MAIL ADDRESS: B PROPOSED- DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION: (Code Section 4-202.A) 6 ? 57$ d3? Y ,5SPi, ?1AbE it ' / /? r ' ? -1- Tzz ?? ? e: ET ADDRESS of subject s R •' ? ? z? ?•_? GAL DESCRIPTION: SSE nrMe'"t), "5Xy`=Ar Y (if not listed here, please note the location of this document in the submittal) " ' MAY 2 4 2005 ?nHs4XI 2 P CEL NUMBER: SEE R,y-igCFfE? P CEL SIZE: 0 td QCrLF-S ?901/916j o !5?. At - PLANNING mApTouchrr (acres, square feet) T CITY OF CLEAqg.TZ; - PROPOSED USE(S) AND SIZE(S): 20 (2btj DO ms,-izuon uAirTS gVERi94e 5Zac of (number of dwelling units, hotel rooms or square footage of nonresidential use) 0Xs ELY 30(?j . ? . un??T .?f/11 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST(S): `?C? A(.c-o? j_T/ A f'IE1fiHT D? QcaTC.btuG ?Z7 Attach sheets and be specific when identifying the request (include all requested code deviations; e.g. reduction in required number of parking spaces, specific use, etc.) ?1Z@M Q F E To TOP oG c? ? ?C '? /PE?r?CfL0110 or TF na SEPi3ACN 70 3 t q " {02 A&G b"K %42 M ; ec bt.. G .,D.-O" sk- Page 1 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater DOES THIS APPLICATION INVOLVE THE TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR), A PREY USLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, OR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED (CERTIFIED) SITE PLAN? YES NO (if yes, attach a copy of the applicable documents) ROOF OF OWNERSHIP: (Code Section 4-202.A.5) URIbINAL SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TITLE INSURANCE POLICY, DEED TO THE PROPERTY OR SIGN AFFIDAVIT ATTESTING OWNERSHIP (see page 6) RITTEN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 3-913.A) / Provide complete responses to the six (6) GENERAL APPLICABILITY CRITERIA - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. THrs :Df-vet,opmm-T- AF-FrS /-)cA- TfM DES san. c 1?xt kn rn4 Fo e 7 WAL /3u zc a 1^1i Z'r5?-fr ??rcEPr rya '?>a-e M?,,.e ?N? llE??.r F'?hu6s;?D ?s ?.n? (???z,uG w?-t7? f}t i 7ifrt (2rUAi a- sVW-.+y 0 DW4-,L_ Peyw r i t,.? TIf ?S bis rfLm r, 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. r4r', 1>CVPQPM"-r PrwPWET> a-iFf- r -r#& smijbA$tos 0-ca&4.6?- CEr W- oT7F£/L PRO7&e.ri z Ns T/m AaC4 A- tio L.; tct, oPUC ? F- wj C t4A-44 C ©'nhtF-/L P2oPrurr.ES m Lift- PF-UP-.oPdo Zi A f4A?JV-SA- NOa UAdbUSrt/C TD 004$'.' CLw. Welf 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. NJ?'w Tltf1- !a*V .OPHkrot- 0F 'TES 3,0 -uNr-r &JI)Q Ti{{ N&zt?ffQ?rtl2lioc? 1.?rw ISECoJ4L MO(Zf, p. StOrwrsgt, JJS 7 WC- C664N JtC t4%- FOE,(- OF TFfE 7YL4,%J SZ4-%J T- IS uNx-T' '?9J1J At. CDAWcAX -wMy- -rs 7N&RE NOLPJ, '14S3 t.,sytA- rlcPnovf? TN,E QWE7-J-. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. (1/sTM rh*- RabaCrso" -43 u&Xas T/u0M o't?3-?aD RAID -;YE. CK/ k)6bf 6/La4 EeyT?At,(TR.AnfSTEnsi?? TD (2bAbo#irA)j ,q . T2/}PF C Couni-rS WXI.L JdE 1 E??+cED. zev ADDZrroN ., T1KCaF WSLL No 4.0r114942 :AE "t SURAt? -P49f11CSNG1 HEA"5 or_ ?w14QES{?E?aESS, 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. -T/?rs Muc.rr- GAHrt,Y COF1p(,Ex xS Co#a&x5'mNr wrr* 6rtf-E(L DEiUSrrY eoti/oAaAQ(,E P2ofteT-s4S ?or? xrsrs,yC? DEVEcopw?. N9 63? C? Ptgn?t.?ED 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts, on adjacent properties. Wtrw -rl+t; NFS4r+r cat; - wF- ProPnab 3umltD xsG,c7*F 9Fslr," 4LLI)wS Foe. Scrra4ea-S ons -r*c saDFS L-3zrH No ft yertoAa.1 2E4?u?rE k %HfE CfeCr X-A SET' FoEra 'AKj TM£ bES?ErN sr'A.S ARE MEr fbR- TW& Mo%c- PAl2?,krtear- Fon. !¢t. 4%%9 17oo(.. BECK. R .T ?s . ZECAAsc TNZS 53 "KJos Caiymeacmi- DEU. -rt'KaE. vtL%. TC /V Provide complete responses to the applicable flexibility criteria for the specific land use as listed in each Zoning District to which the waiver is requested (use separate sheets as necessary) - Explain how each criteria is achieved, in detail: SEA 4rrAC"1S Ex ys9,'Lr 3 I L ?J? ?? , ? ; l1uL5??J; V r_ MAY 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEVA-MVIENIf CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 2 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater U I E. STORMWATER PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteri Manual and 4-202.A.21) A STORMWATER NARRATIVE MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL APPLICATIONS. All applications that invol addition or modification of impervious surface, including buildings, must include a stormwater plan that demonstrates compliance w the City of Clearwater Storm Drainage Design Criteria manual. A reduction in impervious surface area does not qualify as an exempti to this requirement. If a plan is not required, the narrative shall provide an explanation as to why the site is exempt. ORIGINAL At a minimum, the STORMWATER PLAN shall include the following: _ Existing topography extending 50 feet beyond all property lines; _ Proposed grading including finished floor elevations of all structures; All adjacent. streets and municipal storm systems; Proposed stormwater detention/retention area including top of bank, toe of slope and outlet control structure; A narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. Signature and seal of Florida Registered Professional Engineer on all plans and calculations. Q" COPY OF PERMIT INQUIRY LETTER OR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (SWFWMD) PERMIT SUBMITTAL / (SWFWMD approval is required prior to issuance of City Building Permit), if applicable C Acknowle Bement of stormwater plan requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Stormwater plan as noted above is included Stormwater plan is not required and explanation narrative is attached. At a minimum, a grading plan and finished floor elevations shall be provided. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STORMWATER PLAN AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you t1ave questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. ?./SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Code Section 4-202.A) C? SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY (including legal description of property) - One original and 14 copies; OO' TREE SURVEY (including existing trees on site and within 25' of the adjacent site, by species, size (DBH 4" or greater), and location, including drip lines and indicating trees to be removed) - please design around the existing trees; Cal/LOCATION MAP OF THE PROPERTY; Qr PARKING DEMAND STUDY in conjunction with a request to make deviations to the parking standards (ie. Reduce number of spaces). Prior to the submittal of this application, the methodology of such study shall be approved by the Community Development Coordinator and shall be in cordance with accepted traffic engineering principles. The findings of the study will be used in determining whether or not deviations to the parking standards are approved; /GRADING PLAN, as applicable; (9 PRELIMINARY PLAT, as required (Note: Building permits will not be issued until evidence of recording a final plat is provided); ,a COPY OF RECORDED PLAT, as applicable; ?. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-202.A) ?I? SITE PLAN with the following information (not to exceed 24" x 36"): All dimensions; North arrow; MAY 2 4 2005 Engineering bar scale (minimum scale one inch equals 50 feet), and date prepared; Location map; Index sheet referencing individual sheets included in package; PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ Footprint and size of all EXISTING buildings and structures; _ Footprint and size of all PROPOSED buildings and structures; CITY OF CLEARWATER _ All required setbacks; _ All existing and proposed points of access; _ All required sight triangles; _ Identification of environmentally unique areas, such as watercourses, wetlands, tree masses, and specimen trees, including description and location of understory, ground cover vegetation and wildlife habitats, etc; Page 3 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater 1- Location of all public and privateements; • Location of all street rights-of-way within and adjacent to the site; Location of existing public and private utilities, including fire hydrants, storm and sanitary sewer lines, manholes and lift stations, gas and water lines; All parking spaces, driveways, loading areas and vehicular use areas; Depiction by shading or crosshatching of all required parking lot interior landscaped areas; _ Location of all solid waste containers, recycling or trash handling areas and outside mechanical equipment and all required screening {per Section 3-201(D)(i) and Index #701); _ Location of all landscape material; _ Location of all onsite and offsite storm-water management facilities; Location of all outdoor lighting fixtures; and Location of all existing and proposed sidewalks. /SITE DATA TABLE for existing, required, and proposed development, in written/tabular form: Land area in square feet and acres; ORIGINAL Number of EXISTING dwelling units; Number of PROPOSED dwelling units; _ Gross floor area devoted to each use; Parking spaces: total number, presented in tabular form with the number of required spaces; - Total paved area, including all paved parking spaces and driveways, expressed in square feet and percentage of the paved vehicular area; - Size and species of all landscape material; Official records book and page numbers of all existing utility easement; Building and structure heights; Impermeable surface ratio (I.S.R.); and Floor area ratio (F.A.R.) for all nonresidential uses. ui, REDUCED SITE PLAN to scale (8 % X 11) and color rendering if possible; ? FOR DEVELOPMENTS OVER ONE ACRE, provide the following additional information on site plan: Jiff One-foot contours or spot elevations on site; Offsite elevation >oter evaluate the roposed stormwater management for the parcel; All open space arLocation of all eataining s and earth berms; Lot lines and buile ned); Streets and driveBuilding and struc(dim sioned); Structural overhaTree Inventory; pr certified arborist", of all trees 8" DBH or greater, reflecting size, canopy (drip lines) and condition of such trees. H. LANDSCAPING PLAN SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4-1102.A) t/ LANDSCAPE PLAN: All existing and proposed structures; Names of abutting streets; Drainage and retention areas including swales, side slopes and bottom elevations; _ Delineation and dimensions of all required perimeter landscape buffers; Sight visibility triangles; _ Delineation and dimensions of all parking areas including landscaping islands and curbing; Proposed and required parking spaces; Existing trees on-site and immediately adjacent to the site, by species, size and locations, including driplines (as indicated on required tree survey); Plant schedule with a key (symbol or label) indicating the size, description, specifications and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, including botanical and common names; Location, size, and quantities of all existing and proposed landscape materials, indicated by a key relating to the plant schedule; Typical planting details for trees, palms, shrubs and ground cover plants including instructions, soil mixes, backfilling, mulching and protective measures; Interior landscaping areas hatched and/or shaded and labeled and interior landscape coverage, expressing in both square feet and percentage covered; Conditions of a previous development approval (e.g. conditions imposed by the Community Development Board); Irrigation notes. C3"/ REDUCED LANDSCAPE PLAN to scale (8 '/2 X 11) (color rendering if possible); C3' IRRIGATION PLAN (required for level two and three approval); ? COMPREHENSIVE LANDSCAPE PROGRAM application, as applicable. Landscape associated with the Comprehensive Landscape Program shall exceed minimum Code requirements to offset the areas where minimum Code will not be met. V1 k' I D) MAY 2 4 zoos Page 4 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater PLANNING DEPARTMEW "Y Of: CLEt''iRI AiIIIGii I. BUILDING ELEVATION PLANWBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: (Section 4T62.A.23) Required in the event the application includes a development where design standards are in issue (e.g. Tourist and Downtown Districts) or as part /of a Comprehensive Infll Redevelopment Project or a Residential Infll Project. ORIGINAL Cw UILDING ELEVATION DRAWINGS - all sides of all buildings including height dimensions, colors and materials; LR REDUCED BUILDING ELEVATIONS - four sides of building with colors and materials to scale (8'/2 X 11) (black and white and color rendering, if possible) as required. SIGNAGE: (Division 19. SIGNS / Section 3-1806) ? All EXISTING freestanding and attached signs; Provide photographs and dimensions (area, height, etc.), indicate whether they will be removed or to remain. ? All PROPOSED freestanding and attached signs; Provide details including location, size, height, colors, materials and drawing; freestanding signs shall include the street address (numerals) ? Comprehensive Sign Program application, as applicable (separate application and fee required). e '/: X 11 if submitting Comprehensive Sign Program application. ? ? Reduced signag proposal (8 ) (color), TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY: (Section 4-202.A.13 and 4-801.C) PLANNING DEPARTMENT ? Include if required by the Traffic Operations Manager or his/her designee or if the proposed development: CITY OF C[ EARWATER Will degrade the acceptable level of service for any roadway as adopted in the Comprehensive Plan. I. YY Will generate 100 or more new vehicle directional trips per hour and/or 1000 or more new vehicle trips per day. Will affect a nearby roadway segment and/or intersection with five (5) reportable accidents within the prior twelve (12) month period or that is on the City's annual list of most hazardous intersections. Trip generation shall be based on the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip General Manual. The Traffic Impact Study must be prepared in accordance with a "Scoping Meeting" held with the Traffic Operations Manager and the Planning Department's Development Review Manager or their designee (727-562-4750) Refer to Section 4-801 C of the Community Development Code for exceptions to this requirement. ? Acknowledgement of traffic impact study requirements (Applicant must initial one of the following): Traffic Impact Study is included. The study must include a summary table of pre- and post-development levels of service for all roadway legs and each turning movement at all intersections identified in the Scoping Meeting. Traffic Impact Study is not required. CAUTION - IF APPLICATION REVIEW RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY AND NONE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED, APPLICATION MUST BE RESUBMITTED AND SIGNIFICANT DELAY MAY OCCUR. If you have questions regarding these requirements, contact the City Public Works Administration Engineering Department at (727) 562-4750. L. SIGNA acknowl ge that all representations made in this STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PINELLAS ' 7 l / and a- rate to the best of my knowledge and day orn to and subscribed before -me this of ssentativ to visit and photograph the property 11 A. D. 2005 to me and/or by Acation. 11t / who is personally known has / produced as _ irianhifinntinn Sign re of property owner orireprese at;;y.; DEBORAH CAPONE MY COMMISSION # DD249119 EXPIRES: September 11, 2007 commission expires: Page 5 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater AFFIDAVIT TO AUTHORIZE AGENT: 1-r-se Tsc . L.C.C. (Names of all property owners on deed - please PRINT full names 1. That (I am/we are) the owner(s) and record title holder(s) of the following described property (address or general location): I?s?e,?R??, Cc, fHr?rA`rErt. . Vic. . Got4, (3S 4 6:57 Cif)- 2. That this property constitutes the property for which a request for a: (describe request) pr2C #' CZa SUOMT-r ALS Fog o't.0 -U"Z: r- Cc A.) D®A4 ZAJI(A01 to = rN- 1+ H+T: of 5-13 Fi+ma a-or.D4CK, AN_b 3Lq 5,??-r3Ryr o? pooc, rno,K t"X p eor r 3. That the undersigned (has/have) appointed and (does/do) appoint: -t?c)b4erF S-T=gSZ. V.P. P156 Aev. L G, C. as (his/their) agent(s) to execute any petitions or other documents necessary to affect such petition; 4. That this affidavit has been executed to induce the City of Clearwater, Florida to consider and act oft the above described property; ion and re owner authorizes City 5. That site visits to the property are necessary by City representatives in order tqf pilpcess thr ?ppl11 representatives to visit and photograph the property described in this application; I 1 6. That (1/we), the undersigned authority, hereby certify that the foregoing is true Property Property Owner Property Owner COUNTY OF PINELLAS STATE OF FLORIDA, B fore me the undersi?yn?ed.. an officer duly commissione?,qy the laws f t e Statepf Florida, on this 1-7 day of o G[5 personally appeared / ",t° ?/?/?' A/0 // who having been first duly sworn V ses and says that he/she fully understands the contents of the affidavit that he/she sig d. My Commission Expires: _ jra?ota b EXPIRES: September 11,2007 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters r? a:3CF] J? SAPlanning DepartmenAApplication FormsWevelopment revieMflexible development application 2005.doc MAY 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER Page 6 of 6 - Flexible Development Application 2005- City of Clearwater • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Ex"'B'T' .ORIGINAL LOTS 8, 9,10 AND 11, BLOCK 78, UNIT NO. 5 MANDALAY REPLAT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGE 48, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. RID, (c JVL D MAY 2 4 2005 PLMNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEADWATEI? • EXHIBIT 2 PARCEL I.D. #'s 05/29/15/54756/078/0080 05/29/15/54756/078/0090 05/29/15/54756/078/0100 05/29/15/54756/078/0110 ORIGINAL MAY 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 0 6 EXHIBIT3 ORIGINAL APPLICABLE FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA RESPONSES Our requests in this "Flexibility Development Application", consist of two items. This property is located in the "Tourist District". The rear Setback for a Level two permit would be in a range of 10 - 20 feet. Even though we were able to fit the Building well within this criteria, it became necessary for the Pool and Deck to encroach to 3.33' of the rear Property line. We feel that since this is the only Setback Req't for which we are requesting relief, and this is a situation where relief is commonly granted, we graciously request the same. The other Item for which request relief is in the Height. The range of 35 -100 ft. is given in this district for a Level two review. We are requesting a Height of 58' from B.F.E. to the flat roof deck. In consideration of the Setbacks to the sides' that we strictly adhered too, and the variances in Height that have been granted to other Developments in this area, we feel that this too is a relief that can be granted. Please see attached a hi-lited map clearly depicting variances given, within our area, over the last few years. This project is located in the "Old Florida District" of "Beach by Design". In referencing "Beach By Design", this project would meet certain criteria's as a transition project. To the South are the High rises of "Belie Harbor", to the Vilest at the Beach are the "Ambiance on White Sands (69.5')", and "12 Idelwild (66.42'). This project would be a mid-rise building shorter than those mentioned above. Immediately to the North is "Nepenthe Condos (59')", a project just recently granted approval. We believe that we fulfill the reference made to Densities. Beach by Design says; " Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements". Currently, there are 23 rental units on the property, we are proposing only 20 units. In addition, Beach by Design states "that this District favors Residential more than any other parts of Clearwater Beach". Here again we are replacing a commercial development with a residential development. There is no question that the Development we are requesting will be a great improvement to the area. Removing all the car parking and asphalt in the Boulevard, and replacing it with proper Landscaping, and relocating all a parking under the building, shielded from view may be the greatest accomplishment for the neighborhood. MAY 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ct`y 01= CLEA12 ER Chalets on White Sands - Acacia St ORIGIN 15 condos -- . - - 56' in height - - --- - - ° ---- -- Ocean Breeze - - -- -- ----- - S d Whi j 14 condos 42.67' in height an Chateau on te s 13 condos -Sarver-set St:- Z// 7 - -- - _ 61 66' in height + Somerset St - . - . I -- - O 23 Cambria t units -? / b St - - La Risa condos 28 condos 35' in heigh - .rl_a_ -._ bam -- 69.5' in height -- t La Risa 11 - + -- I? S c I WJtt ; CD I -- 4 condos 51 83' i h i h _ y . n g e t 12 Idlewild -- - Nepenthe Condos 14 condos Glenda-[e_St,-_ 5 condos 6642' in height ------ Royal W ay 59' in height --- - - ---- --- ,- Monaco Resort 33 resort"tlnits 74.67' in height Heirwoo_d St, - a Ambiance On White Sands - Poinsetta Place -- - -- `< 8 townhomes 13 condos 69.5' in height D 37' in height 0 U X O U - - \ - - -- A n- St, - 56 I ty n _ \? - - - Kendaii_St:___ _ J.uanita.Wy. cn _; c3 L cT>3 y L N c? a? U _ _..... -.. - Bay Esplanade- MAY 2 2 ckawav St c Legend Projects Approved Pending On Hold/Incomplete Source: City of Clearwater Planning Department Old Florida District Prepared by: City of Clearwater Planning Department, Mar. 2005 N FLS and FLD- New Construction Projects Since 2001 SITE DATA: ••m mmrr,me m•wo ua rn a= an s m.sw arc sun" an YOr m Yr!•aa IG an m: w umo awn mom rum rL MG %~ s .. mq amwa arr. t f4•mtt W> naMO swaa o suss a MMRW M a •tmo mst. ruw rra saw an. wu m • m•a• tnMn w s - w ear a m to m on anm ,w vrm?-r -e s ram vmM - s • - a tssmimo wM•-r .-s. w LEGEND AO- am. Mta . wMOM •It= d nRRmMr ma MM PAM • PM FU RVA RIM ¦ NOWW W @" • on lm • Maws[ TREES w-ramm6 •.-wmMm w - MMm M[ NOTE: M mcowwx mmst•n m M wt{ M• M OiV1mR /R m a NOTE, M V Mamw=Tmma MR AS OIaRM+ rMwo m W. ? /R? mmmar MM RN1rOmTTE: gap= n saw= mm immom "Irm N 1 mi WOMOM M a Mrt+ua AM M amva a m cwrw aw wm :In Mc NOTE "nouo smell m• m s R.M U a W MMar C RV TAB L ojmj?ll to sn a ma X'C SITE PLAN NTI 0 ?y? U L_ri: !S / tLT.L 7 O V W Z M H 0 ml Q r H S W A Z W am ¦ Q• Z Q„ J? a? w5 v? 9 s • r ? _rrnrrr _ ?r s_? - r.wr l M-n z i H SOUTHERN ELEVATION WESTERN ELEVATION 0 a KM K TA - 0 Z Q Q lY LH r LL rr__? ..rwir W A wrrrw - _wr Z . Elm r Elm > Elm ® ¦ ¦ ¦ w ¦ ® ¦ w w w _ w w w w w w w NORTHERN MOON EASTERN ELEVATION y ??TS XTS Z ? ?7 Q ?C ? W Is ? N A CJi C) a ' i-I. I 0. 0 M3[3 Utv1fLCr/§41f%T u.c. Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner City Of Clearwater, Planning Department June 6, 2005 A# RE: FLD2005-0504&-- 629 Bay Esplanade -- Response to letter of Incompleteness Dear Mark; Please find enclosed the answers to your letter referenced; 1). "The Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Criteria" 2). A Narrative to Section E, Stormwater Submittal Requirements. Previously, we had submitted a full "Drainage plan, as well as a copy of an application for exemption from SWFTMD, as well as all the calculations. This is a property where we have improved the LS.R.'s and expect to get an exemption from SWFTMD, as well we had no problem in meeting the City's criteria for Stormwater retention. 3). A tree survey is enclosed 4). The units will be owner occupied, please find enclosed a Preliminary Plat S). The required setbacks are noted on the Site-plan as well as the points of the Building which are closest to the Property line are dimensioned. But, as we discussed on the Phone, prior to July 7th, a new Site-Plan will be submitted with the Setbacks indicated around the perimeter with a dotted line. 6). There will be no signage provided on the Site. 7). Section K., upon delivery of this package, I will check off under, "Acknowledgment of Traffic Impact study req't's" that it is not req'd. In this property the unit count is being reduced from 23 existing units to only 20 proposed units. And, according to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, where we used ITE codes 320 for Motels and 230 for Condominiums, there will be a substantial drop. I hope this will suffice for your req't's for this submission. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. JUN 07 2005 Yours Tr ; Robe Szas Vice Pres' ent ORIGINAL 1860 N. Ft. Ham on Ave., Clearwater FL 33756 Tel: (727) 460-0730, 4600731 Fax: (727) 460-0732 ORIGINAL June 6, 2005 JUN 0 7 2005 Application: FLD2006-05043 -- 629 BAY ESPLANADE Re: The Comprehensive Inflli Redevelopment Criteria C" by C- ?? ; is „i 1lt ?? 1. a). This property requires the two requests we have made because of the length of the property. For the best use of this land, without fully covering the parcel, the request for the extra floor floor level is within reason so as not to overbuild the parcel. The proposed setbacks of the Building are very generous, especially for the property to the West, and this is afforded because of the narrowness of the building. As to the Setback of the pool deck, this is only a minor request, and again with the placement of the Building in reference to its' shape, this would be the only obvious placement of the pool and deck. b). Not only will this "Upscale" condominium project not reduce the Fair Market value of the surrounding properties, it will actually greatly increase them, by cleaning up the unsightly Neighborhood. This property Is currently almost completely covered by asphalt, and as is nothing more than inexpensive transient rental units. Its' replacement is a Multi-million dollar condo project, with lush landscaping and attractive architecture. c). The proposed Mufti-family, Mid-rise building is otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater. d). The proposed use is compatible with the existing mix of Motels, Hotels, Rental-Units, Townhouses, and already approved Condominiums in the immediate area. e). As previously stated, this proposed project will have an Immediate impact in upgrading the immediate vicinity by reducing traffic, noise and pollution. As well as improving the environment by decreasing the ISR's, and removing all the "Boulevard parking" and replacing it will lush landscaping. This Mid-rise Condominium will be a great improvement, over the collection of old moteltrental units that currently exist. Q. The design of the project, with it's "Mediteranean flair", will add pizazz and style to this portion of Clearwater, and Bay Esplanade. It will only complement the already approved Developments, and those currently being developed. g). In granting the requests made, the flexibility in standards will add to the style, elegance, and overall value of the community of Clearwater, Clearwater Beach and Bay Esplanade. This is a Building which has been designed to match the style of Buildings that have been accepted for Development throughout the City of Clearwater, and which is now currently setting the standard for style in Pinellas County. h). In reviewing Division 14 of Article 3, we have 37 Parking spaces for 20 units. According to the "Shared Parking Formula" we have adequate parking. I). We feel that this project meets the design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. It is located in the "Old Florida District" of "Beach by Design". In referencing "Beach By Design", this project would meet certain criteria's as a transition project. To the South are the High rises of "Belle Harbor", to the West at the Beach are the "Ambiance on White Sands (69.5')", and "12 Idelwiid (66.42'). This project would be a mid-rise building shorter than those mentioned above. Immediately to the North Is "Nepenthe Condos (59')", a project just recently granted approval. We believe that we fulfill the reference made to Densities. Beach by Design says; " Densities in the area should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements". Currently, there are 23 rental units on the property, we are proposing only 20 units. In addition, Beach by Design states "that this District favors Residential more than any other parts of Clearwater Beach". Here again we are replacing a commercial development with a residential • Y Y' s • development. There is no question that the Development we are requesting will be a great improvement to the area. Removing all the car parking and asphalt in the Boulevard, and replacing it with proper Landscaping, and relocating all the parking under the building, shielded from view may be the greatest accomplishment for the neighborhood. JUN 0 7 2005 ORIGINAL 0 0 David F Ramsey, P E- P S M R&S Engineering and Construction Corporation 434 Skinner Boulevard 61 Glen Boulevard Dunedin, FI 34698 Banner Elk, NC 28604 Fax 775 871-3812 webpage: www.ramseyengineering.com 727 734-7020 e-mail engineer@llc.net 828 963-5875 Professional Engineer Ohio-Oregon-Florida-N Carolina-S Carolina-Georgia-Tennessee Professional Surveyor Ohio-Florida-N Carolina General Contractor Class A Florida CGC 010310 North Carolina 44555 Please reply to Florida Address June 6, 2005 Mark T Parry Consulting Planner City of Clearwater 100 South Myrtle Avenue Clearwater, F133756 RE: Venetian Pointe Clearwater Beach, FI Dear Mr. Parry: • ' pit' ' JUN 0 7 2005 cm': ORIGINAL Enclosed herewith you will find the Stormwater Plan narrative as requested in you memo dated May 27, 2005 for the aforementioned project. The property currently is occupied by existing buildings and impervious surface that covers 19,476.00 square feet which is proposed to be modified to a new building with an impervious area of 17,696.23 square feet. A request to the Southwest Florida Water Management District for an exemption to the Environmental Resource Permit is pending. A retention area is proposed which will contain the first 1/2 inch of runoff over the entire site for a total produced volume of 1,229 cubic feet. The retention pond will have a top of bank at elevation 3.50 with a Design High Water Level at elevation 3.00 and a Design Low Water Level at elevation 2.00. All roof drains will be directed to the retention area and a recover rate for the pond to discharged within 6.9 hours after a storm event. Please review the enclosed information and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, David F Ramsey, P E, PSM Fl Engineer 15307 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 s80 Page 1 of 4 View Comparable Non-Residential Sales Mass Appraisal is the systematic appraisal of groups of properties as of a given date using standardized procedures and statistical testing. Its purpose is to provide an equitable and efficient appraisal of all property in a jurisdiction for ad-valorem tax purposes. We recognize that there is a reasonable range of values within which a property can sell. Our Mass Appraisal Market Value tends toward the lower end of the range. Recent upgrades or remodeling efforts completed by a seller in order to prepare a property for sale, especially those on the interior of a building, are often not reflected in our Comparable Sales Value. Finally, our values are historical and are developed using arms length sales from the three years prior to January 1. For this reason, our values are generally lower than what a seller will ask for a property in today's appreciating market. Appraisal Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbirL/cgi-scr3?o=l&a--I&b=l &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property Applo er Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 04 Page 2 of 4 05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 078 / 0050 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:16:57 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TSE TSE LLC OBK: 13817 OPG: 2101 610 MANDALAY AUE CLEARWATER FL 33767 EVACUATION ZONE: A Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 629 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 2003 : sales from 2002 - 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /2,004 13,817/2,101 1,500,000 (M) I 1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 9 /2,001 11,599/1,108 418,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 4 /2,001 11,311/ 610 153,100 (0) I 0000: Book Pgs - 11/1,997 9,911/1,950 252,900 (Q) I 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 475,000 Homestead: ND Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 475,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 475,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater view: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 10,910.47 1) 66 x i 10 100. 00 6,600. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Names 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 10, 910.47 6) 0 x 0 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 10,910.47 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 78, LOT 8 AS DESC. IN Description PL 20 PG 27 & RIP RTS. Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 • Pinellas County Property Ap4ser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 4 0 Page 3 of 4 e Property and Land Use Code descriptions 05 29 1 15 54750 1 078 0080 :01 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:17:05 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 629 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 S-truc-tural E1(--m4B rits Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 0 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 24 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,957 Effective Age 20 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArE3as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1. 00 2,778 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 450 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) . 00 0 4) .00 0 10) . 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commc! rCla1 E}C-t ra FE3aTurBS Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 8X200 1.50 1,600 2,400 2,400 999 2) SHUFBDCT 312SF 1,000.00 1 1,000 1;000 999 3) DOCK 360 20.00 360 71200 21880 11970 4) PATIO}DECK 144 10.00 144 1,440 580 1,970 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 6,860 Map F*1 F a-*] T 1 -+11 R I R http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l&a--I&b=l&c=l &r=.1 &s=l &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property Appoer Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 010 Page 4 of 4 ' °. 4 IOD Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search. Page An explanation of this screen 4 56 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 4 0 Page 1 of 4 Appraisal information Building information Mate 0.10 mile radius Same__area, Land._Use. ._Pro-oerty_Use codes, etc._ Same area, Sales Info Same area, Property Address View Comparable Non-Residential Sales Mass Appraisal is the systematic appraisal of groups of properties as of a given date using standardized procedures and statistical testing. Its purpose is to provide an equitable and efficient appraisal of all property in a jurisdiction for ad-valorem tax purposes. We recognize that there is a reasonable range of values within which a property can sell. Our Mass Appraisal Market Value tends toward the lower end of the range. Recent upgrades or remodeling efforts completed by a seller in order to prepare a property for sale, especially those on the interior of a building, are often not reflected in our Comparable Sales Value. Finally, our values are historical and are developed using arms length sales from the three years prior to January 1. For this reason, our values are generally lower than what a seller will ask for a property in today's appreciating market. Appraisal Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=. I &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property App o er Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 0 0 Page 2 of 4 05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 078 / 0090 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:17:39 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TSE TSE LLC OBK: 13817 OPG: 2101 610 MANDALAY AUE CLEARWATER FL 33767 EVACUATION ZONE: A Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 635 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 9 /2,004 13,817/2,101 1,500,000 (M) I 1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 6 /2,002 12,036/1,928 425,000 (U) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 0/ 0 0 { ) 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /0 01 0 0 { } 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 370,300 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 370,300 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 370,300 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: CW Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater view: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 8,505.57 1) 66 x 110 100. 00 7j260. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4} 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 8,505.57 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 81505.57 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 78, L OT 9 AS DESC. IN Description PL 20 P6 27 & RIP RTS Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1&u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 of Pinellas County Property Appr iser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 0 Page 3 of 4 14 Property _and Land Use Code descriptions 05 / 29 / 15 1 54756 / 078 1 0090 :01 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:17:38 Commercial Card 01 of i Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 635 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1?m?nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame Hone Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Composition Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Carpet Combination Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 3 Heating & Air Heating&Cooling Pckg Fixtures 12 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,956 Effective Age 20 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sulb ArE3as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 J,776 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 370 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Gomm4BrciaJL Extra FE3atures Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) DOCK 120 15.00 120 1,800 720 1,970 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 720 Map R F;11Ft-1 R] FQ FQ http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property App--;ser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 0090 Page 4 of 4 N ky 110 ti BAY r '? CO w 04 r ?? 2 C ' 2 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation _of this screen c' 1 f 6 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r-.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 s Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 Q00 Page 1 of 5 Apprasal,._information Buil.d:ing information Map, 0.10 mile radius Same area, Land Use, Property_ Use codes, etc. Same area, Sales Info Same area, Property Address View Comparable Non-Residential Sales Mass Appraisal is the systematic appraisal of groups of properties as of a given date using standardized procedures and statistical testing. Its purpose is to provide an equitable and efficient appraisal of all property in a jurisdiction for ad-valorem tax purposes. We recognize that there is a reasonable range of values within which a property can sell. Our Mass Appraisal Market Value tends toward the lower end of the range. Recent upgrades or remodeling efforts completed by a seller in order to prepare a property for sale, especially those on the interior of a building, are often not reflected in our Comparable Sales Value. Finally, our values are historical and are developed using arms length sales from the three years prior to January 1. For this reason, our values are generally lower than what a seller will ask for a property in today's appreciating market. Appraisal Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/egi-scr3?o=l&a--I&b=l&c=l &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property App er Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 00 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 075 / 0100 f 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:18:08 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TSETSE LLC OBK: 13543 OPG: 2496 5210 WEBB RD TAMPA FL 33615-4518 EVACUATION ZONE: A Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 637 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 5 /2,004 13,543/2,496 2,200,000 (U) I 1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 3 /i,990 7,234/1,325 1,800,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/1,984 5,888/ 427 400,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /1,979 4,797/ 716 200,000 (Q) I 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 763,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 763,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 763,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 17, 525. 65 1) 136 x 110 100.00 14, 960. 00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be : 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 17, 525.65 6) 0 x 0 . 00 . 00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 17, 525.65 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 78, LOTS 10 & 11 AS Description DESC IN PL 20 PG 27 & RIP RTS Building Information http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 r Pinellas County Property Ap4er Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 4 0 Page 3 of 5 Property and Land Use Code descriDtions . Building I . Building 2. Building #1 05 / 29 / 15 / 54756-/ 078 / 0100 :01 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:18:i0 Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 637 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural E1?rn?nts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Cone Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Hone Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Hard Tile Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 6 Heating & Air Unit Heater Fixtures 18 Bath Tile Hone Electric Average Shape Factor -I-" Design Quality Average Year Built 1,968 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Ar c as Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area i. 00 2,334 7) . 00 0 2) Open Porch .30 281 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Camm(--rcial Extra F?a-tur+E:s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 16X200 1.50 3,200 4,800 4,800 999 2) DOCK 150SF 20.00 150 3,000 1,200 1,968 3) PATIO/DECK 3.00 300 900 490 1,985 4) SHUFBDCT 312SF 1,000.00 1 1,000 11000 999 5) PATIO/DECK 3.00 200 600 240 1,975 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 7,730 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbinJcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=l &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property App er Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 00 Page 4 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 078 / 0100 :02 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:18:17 Commercial Card 02 of 2 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel ( 4 St Property Address: 637 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural Elcmcnts Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall Hone Structural Frame Hone Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Hard Tile Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 5 Heating & Air Unit Heater Fixtures 15 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,957 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 dub ?ircas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,418 7) . 00 0 2) Utility .55 144 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 475 9) .00 0 4) , 00 0 10) . 00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C ommc r c i a1 E x t r a F E3at ur c s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) .00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map FIXRMIEMFIE? r f http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 t Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 0100 C ? z4 7 - WAY 110 , ,r 10 -7 8 Z4 + ? i ti64,? S+:!:? Page 5 of 5 . 16 M OD CO 0 Oi I U) 10 II f r? rn ? y o Sl? ?- 1i9.5 H0 7 12 CD C CO lei 12 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information .Back to Search. Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 BAY Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 0 Page 1 of 5 Appraisal information Building information Map, 0.10 mile radius Same. area, Land-Use, roperty Use_codesetc. Same area, Sales Info Same area, Property Address View Comparable Non-Residential Sales Mass Appraisal is the systematic appraisal of groups of properties as of a given date using standardized procedures and statistical testing. Its purpose is to provide an equitable and efficient appraisal of all property in a jurisdiction for ad-valorem tax purposes. We recognize that there is a reasonable range of values within which a property can sell. Our Mass Appraisal Market Value tends toward the lower end of the range. Recent upgrades or remodeling efforts completed by a seller in order to prepare a property for sale, especially those on the interior of a building, are often not reflected in our Comparable Sales Value. Finally, our values are historical and are developed using arms length sales from the three years prior to January 1. For this reason, our values are generally lower than what a seller will ask for a property in today's appreciating market. Appraisal Information http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property Appo er Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 06 Page 2 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 54758 / 078 / 0100 f 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:19:18 Ownership Information Non-Residential Property Address, Use, and Sales TSETSE LLC OBK: 13543 OPG: 2496 5210 WEBB RD TAMPA FL 33615-4518 EVACUATION ZONE: A Comparable sales value as Prop Addr: 637 BAY ESPLANADE of Jan 1, 2004, based on Census Tract: 260.02 sales from 2002 - 2003: 0 Sale Date OR Book/Page Price (Qual/UnQ) Vac/Imp Plat Information 5 /2,004 13,543/2,496 2,200,000 (U) I 1929: Book 020 Pgs 048- 3 /1,990 7,234/1,325 1,800,000 (M) I 0000: Book Pgs - 12/1,984 5,888/ 427 400,000 (Q) I 0000: Book Pgs - 0 /i,979 4,7971 716 200,000 (Q) I 2004 Value EXEMPTIONS Just/Market: 763,000 Homestead: NO Ownership % .000 Govt Exem: NO Use %: .000 Assessed/Cap: 763,000 Institutional Exem: NO Tax Exempt %: .000 Historic Exem: 0 Taxable: 763,000 Agricultural: 0 2004 Tax Information District: Cu Seawall: Frontage: Bay Clearwater View: 04 Millage: 22.9694 Land Size Unit Land Land Land Front x Depth Price Units Meth 04 Taxes: 17,525.65 1) 136 x 110 100. 00 14, 960.00 S Special Tax .00 2) 0 x 0 .00 .00 3) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without the Save-Our-Homes 4) 0 x 0 .00 .00 cap, 2004 taxes will be 5) 0 x 0 .00 .00 17, 525.65 6) 0 x 0 .00 .00 Without any exemptions, 2004 taxes will be 17, 525.65 Short Legal MANDALAY UNIT NO. 5 REPLAT BLK 78, LOTS 10 & 11 AS Description DESC IN PL 20 PG 27 & RIP RTS Building Information http://Pao.co.pinellas.fl.uslhtbinlcgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.I &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap4ser Information: 05 29 15 54756 0780 ti Property and Land Use Code descriptions . Building 1 . Buildi 2 Building #1 Page 3 of 5 05 / 29 115 154750 1078 10100 :01 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:19:14 Commercial Card 01 of 2 Improvement Type: Motel/Hotel < 4 St Property Address: 637 BAY ESPLAHADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural Elements Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Flat Roof Cover Built Up/Wood Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Hard Tile Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 6 Heating & Air Unit Heater Fixtures 18 Bath Tile None Electric Average Shape Factor -I-" Design Quality Average Year Built 1,968 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub Araas Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,334 7) .00 0 2) Open Porch .30 281 8) .00 0 3) .00 0 9) .00 0 4) .00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 C ammcr c i a1 E xt r a F c at ur s s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) ASPHALT 16X200 1.50 3,200 4,800 4,800 999 2) DOCK 150SF 20.00 150 3,000 1,200 1,968 3) PATIO/DECK 3.00 300 900 490 1,985 4) SHUFBDCT 312SF 1,000.00 1 1,000 1,000 999 5) PATIO/DECK 3.00 200 600 240 1,975 6) .00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 7,730 Building #2 http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=l &r=.1 &s=l &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property Ap er Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 06 Page 4 of 5 05 / 29 / 15 / 54750 / 078 / 0100 :02 27-May-2005 Jim Smith, CFA Pinellas County Property Appraiser 11:19:27 Commercial Card 02 of 2 ' Improvement Type: Hotel/Hotel C 4 St Property Address: 637 BAY ESPLANADE Prop Use: 313 Land Use: 39 Structural Elcments Foundation Continuous Footing Floor System Slab on Grade Exterior Wall Conc Block/Stucco Height Factor 0 Party Wall None Structural Frame None Roof Frame Gable & Hip Roof Cover Composition Shingle Cabinet & Mill Average Floor Finish Hard Tile Interior Finish Drywall Total Units 5 Heating & Air Unit Heater Fixtures i5 Bath Tile Wall Only Electric Average Shape Factor Rectangle Quality Average Year Built 1,957 Effective Age 25 Other Depreciation 0 Function Depreciation 0 Economic Depreciation 0 Sub ArBaS Description Factor Area Description Factor Area 1) Base Area 1.00 2,418 7) .00 0 2) Utility .55 144 8) .00 0 3) Open Porch .30 475 9) .00 0 4) . 00 0 10) .00 0 5) .00 0 11) .00 0 6) .00 0 12) .00 0 Commcrci a1 Extra Fca-turE3s Description Dimensions Price Units Value RCD Year 1) .00 0 0 0 0 2) .00 0 0 0 0 3) .00 0 0 0 0 4) 00 0 0 0 0 5) .00 0 0 0 0 6) 00 0 0 0 0 TOTAL RECORD VALUE: 0 Map LN http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=l&a=l&b=l &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Information: 05 29 15 54756 078 01 00 Now --Mw ,4 7`-) Page 5 of 5 WAY 63436 BAY ...r f J tiro titio - 0-) 9 P. S, . 7 CT' 1 CD 119 'S AT, ?.r 1 Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information Back to Search Page An explanation of this screen http://pao.co.pinellas.fl.us/htbin/cgi-scr3?o=1 &a=1 &b=1 &c=1 &r=.1 &s=1 &u=0&p=05+29... 5/27/2005 118/Play/7.00 09;00 PT I.R(1t9: VEPEA ff IEItt HS T0: Pet.er Meroli • PHGE 00'. k,mis C., ji^rild l,,r5 Hf F P ;1 E N N ;. i?l C S l' . A ORIGINAL ",?"`QI(:i AtJT) ::C)!?iv5F.t'ka N7 L % 'May 18, 2005 C?1ea.rc?,a.t;£a Zoning'. a.t.?c3. T'latatl.iil? :E3oa.ri? O «I-TUN't. IT M/k.Y CONCERN' Ita.ched. to, this l.ette3' i.s tho trafi f:er 1nSt.1'Ul3:1F.1,l.ts pl.aCtn.g 1lae property listed in Lhe. name of TseTse; L.L.C. cordially, TZFPkA c-..TLN.NT.NOS. P.;n.. Tii oir as C. J ermin.gs ITT '? CL"lflL=='lJW-f D MAY 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER rlc? 70:3 3 ?i6 ; Y-A (; 7) 4C,A,79 19 • jenn n ?'r.?net.tler. '.0%May' <'ffff3 09:09 PT FROM; .REFER & JENN I NG-) TO : Peter Mcra l i • PAGE : A0j, ORIGINAL K/ARLt'FN F OF_ SLAKA'ft, CLERK Ur .Vt,lht PINELLAS COUNTY F-1j)RIDA !NSTry WW150687 03109120104 at OD:33 Aref Qr?i RF...C 8K-'13817 PG: 2101,7..107 DQL7ypc:UeeD RLCOROING: $18.50 D 00ir3 $1-AMP: $10600.00 I his in ^,tcLin_ient P'repare'! By- ;,r;d Retur I tka' REFKA & JENN(NGS, F'.A, 703 Court Street G!c:. A atFr. Florid2 7`(, 'ic?L7 File, No. 1043.2 WARRANTY NEED THIS INDENTURE tn) e- this r'?? ? cla;f of June, 2004 l;)ei-vveen PrTf R tJIER.Oi_I singleperson, whose Post Office .wcfCtress is' 067 Eldorado bearwater Beach. F1 f3375-7 fler fter calied the Grantor, end SE ?fSF, LL(-,, vkiose Post Office Address is hereinafter calied the Grantee. T iiat the Grantor, for ir;d in consideration of the. sum of Ten Dollars ($16.00), and other mood and valuable corlsir!c?,atiorlS to said Grantors, in hand paid by said Granl.ees. Mle re cceipt whereof is hereby aclkn;.?w./ledged. by these presents does rant, bargain; sell, -;lien, remise, release. convey a.nd confirm (;06 the saic} Grantee, and Gras tees heirs, CI!.rcre sirs and assiotl5 fore,v)er. the folloWing de5crlbed property situate, lying and theing ill PII)Fjilas County, Florida, to-wit: Lot J; Block 78, t0jandalay ""The Isla o` a Th,Ousrand Palrns" Clearwater Beach Unit No. 6, accc.)rding to the. rna}5 or plat the:roof as recorded in Plat Rook 20. f'i'le(s) 27, Public Records of Pinellas County, Florida, also desc,.ritied as: F rr1i,n the Northwest clorne r of Block 78 of Mandalay ' i tle Isle, of a Thousand Palms" Clearwater Bench Unit No. r, run along c or„e to the left and along Southwesterly boundary of said block chord bearingg 822 ciecl,32'24 " F, 'fiord equal 103.92 feet; leng,h of arc 105 feet, radius 210 fElPt. thence along the same curve to thin left and the same: boundary of said block, chord bearin S47 deg.46'44" E, chorc-t equal 79.5' feet, leny-th of arc 8o feet, radius 219 feet, thence along same rnrvp to thp, lclft, and the same boundary of said bioc* chord bearing S70 J "I" 19 E, cttorct equal 85.39 feet length of arc e:) feet, radius 10 ff:et, ltlence alUncl SarT1e curve to the (eft, and the same boundary of said block, chord bearing S86 dpP 04'41" E. chord equal 2.8.74 feet, length, of arc 20.76 feet, radius 2?1(-T feet. thence F-ast 51.26 feet, fear point of beginning thence East alr,ng said horindary 66 feet, thnrrce N 4 dice. 1317" r .1.10.30 feet to ibF: North Boundary of said block, thence West aloe point of beginning, together with both upland arid submerged land wit rn the afore. aid hbundaly lines, tcgether with all riparian rights themunto apper-tainin g and beloll;lmg. ,\ND and PaIrns" Clearwater Lot 3 Block 78, Man,1012y "The isle of a `l-hnu: Balkh Unit td ?. accorHin to the reap or plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 20, Page(s) 27, Public Records of Pinellas County, Flo;ida. Tax A sensor's Parcel Nurzlber! 0J/2'3/'i5i54756/078/0090 05/2911 5154756M78.10080 MAY 2 4 2005 °tANNING DEPr WI-11A T yI V 0 F CLEARt4frjsR 18/1a-j/706 09:89 PT FRO19: REFER 6- JEWi1HGS TO: F01Fr Me.ro1i • PACE: H04 ORIGINAL Tax I.D. Number of Grantc F (s): 2Q 01RG`374 C,, D[NV(=YANCE IS NOT THE 1-IOML-STEAD OF 1 :Hr- rRANTC)R, Sl. BJEC i to easenleilts. restrictilol,s and reservations of record and taxes fW ifre current year and :quhsequellt. ye-Vs Tou)ETHER with all the tenerrjent.;, hPrE?ditanlFnts ?jijd api: utlenances thereto ho)c)nging or in anywise appertaining. FO HAVE AND TO HOLD thy: write in fee simple, f,u-ever AND SAIn GRANTOR hereby covenants with said Grantee that he is iavwlully yeized of said land it) fE+c sitilple, he has good right and lav?,fui authority to sell and convey said land: that he hereby fully warrants the title to said land and will defend the sarne against the lawful claims of alf persons whom.5oever, and that said land t,5 free of all enl-umbrances. "Grantor" and "Grantee" are t.izpd for singular or plural, as context FOquirc?s. iN Wi T NESS WHEREOF. the SAW Gt'?ntor, have caused these pl 5cnts t,5 be execkited in tht?ir names the clay And year firyt. Above Britten. /? SIGNATURE OF WlTNFFpES. Sic - S6,1 W4 -' Print (la#tl:-rat.^ e `?'?,,?V. STATE ()F FL0RID.A COUNTY OF- PINFLL.Ar I hereby (7,rfify that on this day personally appeared before rile, a,n officer duly ;4ufhorized to ad in1 I?o.aths and take acknowledgments, PETER NIE ROL.I, a single person., to m? ersonally_?.r+uv??r? and known to me to be the individUal riescribed herein (or who p(orluceci - as identification), Who took an oath and .rlhi? ackncwlerge-T Tti± +s :ris?'rrirnenT-was r?ety and voluninrily execr.atcrc4 for the purposes hierei6 expressed: WITNESS my hand and official seal, this ` r(ay of June 2004.., KI: MY CO1'lnliSSiOr? Expirc;s: ,I('iYCE S. [1t.SKIIA ;r. t:ommtr ODG20H316 j 1 4?k??;-fxnlroc •- !7 [JL--3 " if ` i ,eA tnl llCA 32 114- ,tr,?. r. ?•rn:i?.' i"IWO, tta Nolary Aain.• Icv , ?1-? 5u/mil ....................... ............ MAY 2 4 2005 PLAW'V?C DEPARTMENT C9TY OF CLWj jA1: • .r i,,, dc;<piepai'ed t.; (;latai,cta'a v't. 1,?ilTtSnl7-}?rJVt=? ;l l ?tE. >r?t ?? a'nkeT r.A T.,1?1Dd, 1,l ?,t `_lf1t?L fit,.,,, ?. I ?.rd•,le, r, y , , Pope, P'0 ? t2:uppel c4. i uist:;, 1..Li Fl-: 0 ORIGINAL KARLEEN F. DE UL.AKER CLERK OF COURT NNELtAS CCWN'r'l FL.ORMA MIST# 2004181491 06103P2004 at 09.0 PM OFF REG EM. 13W PG; 2496-2497 DocType:DEED RECORDING.- $10.50 YD DOUG STAMP: $15404,00 MAY 2 4 2005 PP.MMMMG DE-?ARTME- T CITY OF CLEARMER ?.'jY.??.1.1.i11i?C1Pt(fC.3l?r?.`F ?? fia 1 ?Yit d. liability cnrn?an-y `,?Lsd-atat.?r }, tu??i',?.S?,, LI,Cratll]a, Florida :33015. t Wh 05 f' 1.10 S0it1CC a0dres Nk1.T.NL5SR it H: 1._118 s1 017 of tile. su l of$10,00 arid other :Ood and val.uab1c t ti]E?}T31] 'tCl.'•:- t:?i' c:h.tf 1. P. C(?T!.`•i (f1f8? , a c )d . .,•gran col]si<er-c 3tiolz tt>e recea ,t of which is l?- , tcE?}ea5 kiso;? dd sil do ti c, folk * ntg dc,-vs_d land' in C.r,?ve?? unto the Gran-tee and Gz,n e., 5 s cc ': i;.ellas County, l~ iorld '.. r N10, 5 NMANDALA l ETLA"(', a.cvorl&og to the plat tb.ereoi .? . iat part of Block 78, ;1111 ? ?;;,cat iQ and 'Lot i 1, Block 78, recorde d in Flat Book N,, page 48, which vas formerly ho,? t1 -,M) .INDALA.Y "THE ISLE OF IN'THOUSAND PALMS" CLEA-RWATER. BEACH UNIT NO. ,0 Page ;.' ; , all, of the public t•ecol-cls of accorditlg i.?, the. plat the.l'eof re.(,o? drd iDl Plat Book 2, t Fio lda.. Tat i'arccl ?? #()Si?9;`l,7/5=E%5G/t?7?;i1)i(?t1 7'O?I l,vi.tll al.a rlhe I?nerl;,ertts, h.e:re ?itaTlhCnts, and appurt.(;llallces tll.?]et.o. ' j,?? V EA-PM (be Sal':1 ' L:11:C1 Ciralli.eE' ally. JJ."cU?itr, SltcctSS(?f,s al.`l: ?i.s?i?? [l ; i1 T (:) lC fore,?er. lical)l.e z{11131.; Qr<<>nrttjces, nja:ttcrs a.ppearuig ol.i. all} Th"17, co-rv(;Nanicc is Ma(3(; sllt)JeCt ko aE?p. t-?C ('.t'Cle(i ?)lat of the land, aild taxes fOT tlhe cut7t:.llt l.l;ti subsequell, years, iral'ttc..l C:C)?5 Iht?l'et)Y izovenailt. Vv ith the Grtln.tect.i,at the E Trantor is l.aw'fudy sei And tlhe ,il. right t and ).t1wu! autl]c?r:ity t:o sell and ??onvey s;d prel]hise:> ia] fec sittlple that tiie LTrsll.t(?r has goo ail e.rlti?i1;z.l,Tan.ces except as noted above; that ,he prelrwreZ-; that the title ",o the Premise,-, 15) t'CE 21(??1 • :3('alht?Q W ? ? 5V Warrat]t.S the title 10 i.he f3ratAtot' beret) fut. ttl have au that 0.1e, quiet I]OSir;SStOIl; ... _ ?)r('liZjSi',S iil](f will t-fCf't.IlCl '•:1]L'. Sslil7t 3p',?11I]St' tE]C ?.i7.1.N1'•1! ?1i1111ZS of 01 ?11:1'S(?i15 \vll(.)Y1?lSQe1?t.'.7: ?•?'C?,?C as 0 ORIGINAL tl?Ot' First v' 7 talc: _ ? -. .. .-? A.6dre5;621 E> ty ' spy ttiac3, ??131`r itlstil',tl;ta'r,: l ` S lGrri ,.? .? I e ( of COA S 1,. 1'?I\ 5! --- -t, ?• 1 ?Oi et}(iTt 1S1 ??C?`t l{1t i;C)l7)Lf =:t1Cll?. .?ti?t : 15 e, I{l?lif?'?CI O?\!il to Ytl.c(:,f ilas prl?i i.t" t Zc (ljt•i'tpl?;C: ?f'tpti. Porlt ?'j',' ('p)?tt?lil'.5int1 r.X.G:)1rC`S: bi LL-j 03 :; v L,7 MAY 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CriY OF CLEp,?71,vgTr 0 i - , I. ir! _.:,):J . 27 .1;;1'x•11 . STATE OF FLORIDA AFFID.;1.V IT COUNTY OF PNELT,A.S 0 RE ,::", BEN BEFORE M.P., the t)n.de,rsigned with.only, personally appeared TT-JOMA/ C. JBN M- C-iS III, who after being first duly sworn wad. who is personally kliown to me, d. d. stake as follows: A..f..fza.nt. Is all attorac:y at law, who prac.ticc.s i.r,!. the ar;c.a c.)f real estate \vith the firm of Repka tk Jenui.tlgs,, P. A.., 703 Court. Strcet, Cloarwater, FL 33756 and is a member of Tb.c Florida Bar, 2. A:f'taant has personal. ictiowl.edge that tl;.e properties set forth on Composite "A.." are titled i.n the uaroe, riff SE TSE LLC. .3. FuAIter A.M. mt saN ott-, Clot. C' 7 -7 / 71 ORIGINAL \ , 1. 7?10,'i\tAS C..TENNINCrS TIT ? j VWJ"T'NE SS my hand and offic.ial at Cicanvater, Pinel.l.as County, Florida,, this --J-.--. day of May. 700.5. vOTAR PU[3LTC IVY COM.j\,4,TSSION EXPIRES': JOYcB S. Br\S!:!N COMMV ?? ti 6?piron tl/21IY007 _ n DOMOd IhN (W)412.4254: ?,?,?..,'y;.'...... F1014 A Notary 0.tion, In* MAY 2 4 2005 PLANN IlI?"G DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLFA Sgt!/, TES 1° k? RLPKA & JL-'NNINC33S, t'.A AT"ITORNLYS AND COUNSELORS AT L-A\X/ Thomas C- Jennings III May 17, 2005 Clearwater Zoning and Planning Board TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ORIGINAL Joyce S. Baskin Paralegal Attached to this letter is the Resolution of TSeTSe, LLC authorizing Peter Meroli to sign for actions before this Board. Cordially, REPKA & JENNINGS, P.A. Thomas C. Jennings III MAY 2 4 2005 PLNNNNS DZPA RTo}IENT CITY OF CL1-A;Tv11 ,TER 703 CLAM Sneer ° Clearwater, Florida 33756-5507 TEL: (777) 441-4550 W FAX: (727) 461-2919 s JcnuingsC?utrner.r?ef: ZOO MUd H0JQW "Tad :OZ squinaf 2 NEU :WUHd Id 882T S88Z/fiuW/LT 17/May/Z66S 11:49 PDT FROM: IV EPRA R JENNINGS TO: Peter Meroli PAGE: 002 ORIGINAL Resolution to Authorize WHEREAS, this Limited Liability Company desiring to petition the Clearwater Planning and Development Board, be it: RESOLVED, that the proper member of this Entity (i.e. Peter Meroli) is hereby authorized to sign, execute and present any and all matters, for and in behalf of this Limited Liability Company regarding any petition or matter before the City of Clearwater Planning and Development Board and is hereby authorized and directed to sign any documents required by The City of Clearwater to carry out the provisions of this resolution. The undersigned hereby certifies that he/she is the duly elected and qualified Secretary and the custodian of the books and records and seal of TseTse, LLC, a limited liability company duly formed pursuant to the laws of the state of Florida and that the foregoing is a true record of a resolution duly adopted at a meeting of the Directors and that said meeting was held in accordance with state law and the Bylaws of the above-named Corporation on May 17, 2005, and that said resolution is now in full force and effect without modification or rescission. IN WITNESS WHEjREOF, I have executed my name as Secretary of the ab Zven ed imite Liability Company this 17th day of May, 2005. Secre ?"ry - Peter M r li GNkPPS\1045.19\Reso1r.tion to Audwrize Borroiving on a Line of Credit.wpd MAY 2 4 2005 PW NN G ©6'_--'RPtRTMEgT C F i Y 0 F CL p 7,;Y ,'vr1--P ?, tl C t m - - - to i•% "? ?+ c r cr- LM V2 { 0 >- 01 U, C" < <_ CL I I I P' *THE CAY T CLW. BEACH CONDO 11 -78 r? 9 3 118 CIA 2498 CITY OF CLEARWATER $ ASTER STMT ?4 AND VICINITY FLORIDA °0 7 PINEILAS COUNTY. 6 p PREPARED 6Y PUBWC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENCINEERINC 5 2 t2 WAY lob S Ntrtle Ave.. Cl-sater. FL 33756 Ph.: (27)562-4750. Fax (727)526-4755 4$a http://swmaeuaotn-n, eam/Clty?oportmenta/puak_eorka/engineer/ 1 6 a 7 1 8 9 tD ? n 10 R 17 v 12 t2.° w3 n 1 12 ne 85 t2 . A ST 6 13 %FSn 7 Do, Rom 13- CDNOE ? 2 73 11 73-61 12 16eaD F17 1 a % taaa 3 Tb 4 ' 6 !.5 11 10 20 ,g aD 1 W E ! $ 2 2 E ST a 1 :9 afe se 1 AS-OF CLW $ROYAL $ WAY H CON eaa, y t3 _.. g .T r t - e ae 4q, 'eC w G?6 13 t so ,0 .t1 as 5 8 ' cnn2 won - ass e- 2 . ;; Y' & L 2 . 11114 13 6 2 as 1 Q? T "'AN A - A aw 7 , 16 ass t s .. t ffi ear aaa . ` a R. n KENOAtl g sT I . - sa SFm TA ` s?" ?iseao w an 1 ... \ f>J3 @ $ 4 5 2 lit to B 9 371 c w g 51 -:6s4 17ee4 is to /3 W 11 10 3 a 3 W .7 s teem ' VL 8 $ eo 4 0. a a.19 g O s BAY wo r : e g b.a T5- - g. Hai as / R CLEARWATER BEACH REC. CWPLEX O , 33/07 A.7 ?7 v ? MANDALAY , 2. rawariv JSe. oa >a-m LARK O S / X aeA2n p. ow s2-1a P 4 o as .Am R RMAWAY 8 $MET . i a MISER$ It it ivv ` \ J BELLE HARBOR sty t 10 9 6 ® \? 1 J ( ' 7'? 2 Izo 1 p arc ,2R-r. T 1_ so H D 1 Publle Inlormalton data 1s fmilhed by the City of C1001WDUr 61-1 3 Public Works AdmhlstrallDn/Engl.arlnq and must be accepted and used by the reclDient 1llh the undmslardh9 toot the data ecelved vas adiaeted fq. the pufP*- 11 developing a grwMc 'Inlrostructure inventory. N suM. Ins CIly of LYmrlofer PWA/E - mokse . wmr 0.. osDroaead orJmplled, conaamNqq tno fo l d l f 1;` ' r o o lh s omr wy. a pleterl . "nobility. or wilabRlty o olher partttulor use. Furlhermare. the LYty of Cleorrmter any ?? I . PWA/E assumes no Ibbatly whosoever asdodoled 11tH the use or misuse of such data. G to V `!r This Aflas page 1s su bjoet to pnbdk change" al PWA/E or d Far hformotton osout lofeet revisions please c visit Our Woo site. N t) P so I 0 1,00 200 400 600 SCALE: 1" - 400' LEGEND: O BLOCK NUMBER 1234 LOT ADDRESS -?--- CITY LIMITS LINE SHADED AREA - PROPERTY OUTSIDE CLEAR-WATER CITY LIMITS A AGREEMENT TO ANNEX 't? CITY OWNED PROPERTY MDR ZONING DESIGNATION ZONE LINE RE70NE DAD l aRn w/m/m Mas12 12/13/0 1 C IWKCIM 09/24/92 I REVISED: I 09/09/2002 ZONING ATLAS SW 1 /4 OF SECTION Q /, 15 E 267B Al 5 - 29 S- 8 A 1. y . • 1, 0 DavidFRamsey,PE - PSM R&S Engineering and Construction Corporation 434 Skinner Boulevard 61 Glen Boulevard Dunedin, F134698 Banner Elk, NC 28604 Fax 775 871-3812 webpage: wwiv.ramseyengineering.com 727 734-7020 e-mail engineer(a?llc.net 828 963-5875 Professional Engineer Ohio-Oregon-Florida-N Carolina-S Carolina-Georgia-Tennessee Professional Surveyor Ohio-Florida-N Carolina General Contractor Class A Florida CGC 010310 North Carolina 44555 Please reply to Florida Address May 23, 2005 Richard M Alt, P E Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa, F133637-6759 RE: Venetian Pointe Clearwater, Fl Dear Richard: Enclosed you will find a request for an exemption for the aforementioned project. Attached you will find the Permit Inquiry Checklist, Final Site Plan, Aerial Photograph, Soil Conservation Service Map and Copy of the Certificate of Title and Power of Attorney for the property. Please approve at your earliest possible convenience. Sincerely, David F Ramsey, P E, PSM MAY 2 4 2005 PLAKIWIMG DEW- aTP ENT CITY OF CLEK frAtTE ? i . Land Owner(s) Agent (If Different from. Land Owner ORIGINAL Representative's Name: Representative's Name: Steve Szasz David F Ramsey Company Name: M3B Development, LLC Address: 1860 N Ft Harrison Ave, Clearwater, FI 33755 Phone#: 727 467-0730 2. Project Name: Venetian Pointe Company Name: R and S Engineering and Construction Corporation Address: r 434 Skinner Boulevard, Dunedin, F134698 Phoned: 727 734-7020 County: Pinellas SecfI'wp/Rge: 05/29/15 3. Please label the following items in square feet: Existing Conditions: Proposed %Conditions: Building, Sidewalk, etc.' 9,476.91 SF _ Building, Sidewalk, etc.: 14,613.14 SF Vehicular Use: 9.999.'2 SF Vehicular Use: 3,083.09 SF Grass, Open Area: '0,020.87 SF Grass, Open Area.: 11'800.67 SF o Submit a brief narrative describing the proposed construction activities. Renlace Existing Buildings with New Construction of Condo o Submit au aerial photograph with the project area (proposed construction area) and total land area (total land area of ownership) delineated. Attached o Submit detailed construction drawings to clearly illustrate the proposed construction activiti.:-. Site Plan Attached o Are there any wetlands in or adjacent to the project area? If so, please contact Alberto Martinez, Environmental Scientist Manager, at (813) 985-7481, extension 2007, to discuss your project. No Wetland on Property o Other useful documentation to expedite your permit inquiry review includes the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) soil survey and the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FEMA) with the project boundary delineated on each. Attached o Please pail to: Richard 114. Alt, P.E. Southwest Florida Water Management District 7601 Highway 301 North Tampa; FL 33637-6759 L MAY- 2 4 2005 • PERMIT INQUIRY CHECKLIST 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CI iY 0 F CtzAi IATE,2 Pine,l las County Property Appraiser hito.rmat>on: US 29 15 54/5O 0// UU /U • • rage i w nR?riniAL Pinellas County Property Appraiser Parcel Information p_ MAY 2 4 2005 PLOa1 NING Dr d???lT lJac)c 1:0 e8.1'Cll..l}a'?C C;'[ OF C,i =`M' n `711r'G::?ii?C? A.n explanation of this screen littp://pa.o.co.pin.ellas.fl.us/1ltbin/cgi.-scr3?o=l&a=l&b=1&c=1&r=.12&s=1&t3=1&u=0&p... 5/23/2005 _J Q CD r,yl O J Wit'' *,? ?. i. .. _. - - tom, •• =now YM_ RECEIVED MAY 2 4 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATE-P VENETIAN POINTE SOUT 4ERK ELEVATION J Q z O .? -- -m DOD / e. ,. qtr s I L 1 ! r G Y 1 ? ? f ? I ? p 24'DRF." 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN RECEIVED he, A, 2 4 2v?5 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER VENETIAN P OIN 1C • s?irtrl LONG RANGE PLANNING DIivPLOP1MENT RI?VIIiW August 29, 2006 Mr. Robert S. Szasz M313 Development L.L.C. 1951 Brightwaters Boulevard NE St. Petersburg, Florida 33704 • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pos r Orl icl: Box 4748, G.rARWATrtz, Fl.ofuDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 Souni MYR'i-u: AVI?NCI,, CLEARWAII•IT, FLORIDA 33756 TEILE'I love: (727) 562-4567 PAX (727) 562-4865 Re: FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Request for Extension of Development Order Dear Mr. Szasz: On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) approved the above referenced Flexible Development application to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District with an increase to the permitted height from 35 feet to 58 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase to the height of the parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, and a reduction to the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 3.33 feet (to pool deck) as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C of the Community Development Code. Pursuant to Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, an application for a building permit must be initiated within one year from the date of CDB approval (by August 16, 2006). This same Section allows an extension of time to initiate a building permit, provided good cause is shown and documented in writing within the original period of validity. The Planning Director may also consider whether significant progress on the project is being made and whether or not there are pending or approved Code amendments that would significantly affect the project. On August 25, 2006, the Planning Department received a request for an extension of the timeframe to initiate a building permit to construct the improvements on this parcel. As per the above referenced provisions of Section 4-407 of the Community Development Code, this request was not received within the original period of validity; therefore an extension cannot be approved for this Flexible Development application. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via email at robert.tefft(o),myclearwatencom. Sincerely, Michael Delk, AI Planning Director S: (Planning Department I C D BIFLEX (FLD)Ilnactive or Finished Applications lBay Esplanade 619 M3B Development (7) - ApprovedlBay Esplanade 621 - Time Extension Denial 08-29-06.doe I NVXK Ili! MINI). i11.MW C:\m :\A. I'rrers[A' Cliff W 1'%W\1JgU( Aug 24 ,w n#5:lvp The Szasz House • 727-524-3282 • P.1 M 3 B DEVELOPMENT L.L.C DATE: AUGUST 237 2006 To: MR. MICHAEL D ELKS AI C P FROM: ROBERT S. SZASZ RAGES: TOTAL OF 2 (INCLUDING COVER) 0 I F! 10, N-, I F0T AUG 2 5 2006 DEVELOPMENT SkRuir,ES OI-P' . --._.C1.T.Y-0E.fLEAPWATER.__ i :? 3p The Szasz House Aug 24 *?o LN, • 727-524-3282 p.2 • M 3 B DEVELOPMENT L.L.Ca August 23, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director, City of Clearwater P.O.Box 4748, Clearwater, R. 33758-4748 Re: FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Delk ? ?`'L1JV0 AUG 2.5 2006 n it l?Y? %1k A L. I r, EPT I am writing you in reference to the Development Order noted above. Over the last few weeks, we were relocating our offices. Our files were misplaced, and because of a filing error, this letter is getting to you a week later than we would have wanted. This project, as well as another project we have under a Development order at 651 Bay Esplanade, are "Sister" projects. Due to the drastic changes in the global economic situation we are in, these two projects were combined for marketing purposes. It became a necessity to do so, and all our concepts, as to Design and Marketing are such patterned. There has been a severe turn in the economic conditions that has adversely affected costs as they relate to materials and labor, as well as holding costs with the rise of interest rates. We have had to re-think, and re-tool ourselves, in order to cope with these changes and make a viable project. Because of this, I respectfully request an extension to the above reference D.O. I appreciate your time and consideration to this matter. Sin Roberf S sz Vice Pr sident Via: Fax & US S 1951 Brightwaters Blvd. N.E., St. Petersburg Fl., 33704 (727) 656-8742 Fax: (727) 522-7917 0 M 3 B DEVELOPMENT • L.L.G. August 23, 2006 Mr. Michael Delk, AICP Planning Director, City of Clearwater P.O.Box 4748, Clearwater, Fl. 33758-4748 Re: FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Delk I am writing you in reference to the Development Order noted above. Over the last few weeks, we were relocating our offices. Our files were misplaced, and because of a filing error, this letter is getting to you a week later than we would have wanted. This project, as well as another project we have under a Development Order at 651 Bay Esplanade, are "Sister" projects. Due to the drastic changes in the global economic situation we are in, these two projects were combined for marketing purposes. It became a necessity to do so, and all our concepts, as to Design and Marketing are such patterned. There has been a severe turn in the economic conditions that has adversely affected costs as they relate to materials and labor, as well as holding costs with the rise of interest rates. We have had to re-think, and re-tool ourselves, in order to cope with these changes and make a viable project. Because of this, I respectfully request an extension to the above reference D.O. I appreciate your time and consideration to this matter. Sinc Robe S asz V ice Pr sident Via. Fax & US S ORIGINAL RECEIVED A;iJG 2 8 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF CLEARWATER 1951 Brightwaters Blvd. N.E., St. Petersburg Fl., M04 (727) 656-8742 Fax: (727) 522-7917 I 1 ? J I6"4t?, ;tom! ??s?.qF y gq ? gyp` O?,,qq ?4?r{ i 11 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW August 17, 2005 Mr. Robert Szasz 1860 N. Fort Harrison Avenue Clearwater, FL 33755 CITY OF CLE.ARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAX (727) 562-4576 Re: Development Order - FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Dear Mr. Szasz: This letter constitutes a Development Order pursuant to Section 4-206.D.6. of the Community Development Code. On August 16, 2005, the Community Development Board (CDB) reviewed your Flexible Development application to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to the permitted height from 35 feet to 58 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), to increase the height of the parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, to reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 3.33 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. The CDB APPROVED the application with the following bases and conditions: Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.67 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 3. The subject property is currently developed with 8 attached dwellings and 11 overnight accommodation units; 4. The subject property is permitted a maximum of 20 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 5. The development proposal is consistent with the Community Development Code and the Future Land Use Plan category with regard to the maximum allowable density; 6. Adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with attached dwellings (duplexes and triplexes) and single-family dwellings with heights varying between one and three stories, with the surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings and overnight accommodations; 7. The proposed height of the building is 58 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 8. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with these sites; 9. The development proposal meets the General Applicability criteria of Section 3-913.A; and 10. The development proposal meets the Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria of Section 2-803.C. Conclusions of Law: 1. The development proposal is compatible with the surrounding area; 2. The development proposal complies with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design; BRIAN J. AUNGSC, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOPI' HAN11U1*ON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER ® CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILIXIEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER" • • 3. The development proposal complies with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Project per Section 2-803.C; and 4. The development proposal complies with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.A. Pursuant to Section 4-407, an application for a building permit shall be made within one (1) year of Flexible Development approval (by August 16, 2006). All required Certificates of Occupancy shall be obtained within two (2) years of the date of issuance of the initial building permit. Please be advised that time frames do not change with successive owners. The Community Development Coordinator may grant an extension of time for a period not to exceed one (1) year and only within the original period of validity. The CDB may approve one (1) additional extension of time after the Community Development Coordinator's extension to initiate a building permit application. The issuance of this Development Order does not relieve you of the necessity to obtain any building permits or pay any impact fees that may be required. In order to facilitate the issuance of any permit or license affected by this approval, please bring a copy of this letter with you when applying for any permits or licenses that require this prior development approval. Additionally, an appeal of a Level Two approval (Flexible Development) may be initiated pursuant to Section 4- 502.B. by the applicant or by any person granted party status within 14 days of the date of the CDB decision. The filing of an application/notice of appeal shall stay the effect of the decision pending the final determination of the case. The appeal period for your case expires on August 30, 2005 (14 days from the date of the CDB decision). Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert G. Tefft, Planner III at (727) 562-4539 or via e-mail at robert.tefft(a,myclearwatencom. Sincerely, Mic ael Delk, CP Planning Director CDB Meeting Date: Case Number: Agenda Item: Owner: Applicant: Representative: Address: August 16, 2005 FLD2005-05044 TSE TSE, LLC M313 Development, LLC Robert Szasz 629 Bay Esplanade CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT GENERAL INFORMATION: REQUEST: Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to the permitted height from 35 feet to 58 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), to increase the height of the parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, to reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 3.33 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. EXISTING ZONING / Tourist (T) District. LAND USE: Resort Facility High (RFH) Category. PROPERTY USE: Current Use: Overnight accommodations (11 units); and Attached dwellings (8 apartment units). Proposed Use: Attached dwellings (20 condominium units). ADJACENT ZONING / North: Preservation (P) District - Clearwater Harbor. LAND USE: South: Tourist (T) District - Attached dwellings. East: Tourist (T) District - Overnight accommodations. West: Tourist (T) District - Attached dwellings. CHARACTER OF THE The surrounding area is a mixture of attached dwellings and overnight IMMEDIATE VICINITY: accommodation uses. ANALYSIS: Site Location and Existing Conditions: The 0.67-acre subject property is located on the north side of Bay Esplanade at the northern terminus of Cypress Avenue. The property has a zoning designation of Tourist (T) District with an underlying Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) category of Resort Facilities High (RFH). The property is also located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District. According to the City's records, the subject property is currently developed with 8 attached dwellings (629, 635 Bay Esplanade) and 11 overnight accommodation units (637 Bay Esplanade). The subject property includes four single story buildings, two accessory shuffleboard courts, and back out parking encroaching into the Bay Esplanade right-of-way. The immediate vicinity is almost entirely comprised of attached dwellings (duplexes and triplexes) with single-family dwellings further to the north and the structures vary in height between one and three stories. Within the immediate vicinity there are four Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05044 - 1 of 6 approved condominium developments: La Risa I (650 Bay Esplanade) at 69.5 feet in height, La Risa U (669 Bay Esplanade) at 52 feet in height, Nepenthe (665 Bay Esplanade) at 59 feet in height, and Poinsettia Place (605 Poinsettia Avenue) at 37 feet in height. Proposal: The development proposal consists of five habitable floors over a level of parking (58 feet from base flood elevation to roof deck), with four dwelling units per habitable floor. Each dwelling unit consists of approximately 3,000 square feet of living area with three bedrooms. A pair of elevators and four stairwells will be located along the south fagade of the building, providing access to the floor lobby's as well as directly to the units themselves. The existing back out parking within the Bay Esplanade right-of-way will be removed and replaced with sod and a five-foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the property line. It is noted that no sidewalk presently exists adjacent to the subject property. The development proposal also includes the provision of a swimming pool / spa with deck at the northwest corner of the site. Parking and a solid waste staging area will be located on the ground floor. No signage is proposed for the development at this time. As previously noted, the 0.67-acre subject property is located within the RFH FLUP category, which permits a maximum density of 30 attached dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the subject property is permitted a maximum of 20 attached dwelling units. The development proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Code and the FLUP limitations with regard to density. Beach by Design: In 1997 and 1998, a Plan was prepared for the City entitled "Clearwater Beach: Strategies for Revitalization. " This Plan was prepared after an extensive public process, directive surveys and input from the City Council and City administration. The purpose of Beach by Design, which was adopted by the City Council in 2001, is to implement the recommendations of that Plan and regulate development within certain areas of the beach. The subject property is located within the "Old Florida" District of the Beach by Design special area redevelopment plan and is defined as "an area of transition between resort uses in Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia (Street). " In order to implement this vision, Beach by Design identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development within the "Old Florida" District. Further, Beach by Design states that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. While "mid-rise" is not specifically defined within the Community Development Code, based upon the height standards set forth in the Medium Density Residential (MDR), Tourist (T), and High Density Residential (HDR) Districts, the Planning Department has interpreted "mid-rise" development as having a maximum height of 50 feet. Development within the immediate vicinity of the subject property consists of attached dwellings, small motels, and condominiums between one and three stories in height with building styles generally resembling architecture from the 1950's. Based upon the above, the type of development proposed (condominium) is inconsistent with the preferred development types in the "Old Florida" District. Further, the proposed height of the building (58 feet to roof deck) is also adjudged to be inconsistent with low to mid-rise development and is therefore inconsistent with Beach by Design. Staff has found instances where development proposals have been approved within the "Old Florida" District (some with Staff support) that, in retrospect, are wholly incompatible and inconsistent with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design. These projects, if built, will be out of scale with the Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05044 - 2 of 6 • 0 surrounding area and could result in the failure of the District to function as originally intended (i.e. as a transitional area between the Central Beach and the low intensity residential neighborhoods north of Acacia Street). Due to these developing conditions and after extensive study of the "Old Florida" District, Staff has taken a more conservative approach to development within this Beach by Design plan area, especially as it relates to building height. Therefore, the height requested with this development proposal, as it is inconsistent with the "Old Florida" District, cannot be supported. Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project and General Applicability Criteria (Sections 2-803.C and 3-913.A): In addition to the development proposals inconsistency with the "Old Florida" District, the development proposal is also inconsistent with the following Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project criteria: The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards. Staff agrees that the requested deviation to the rear (north) setback is warranted given the size and shape of the lot, historical development patterns in the area, and the fact that the reduction is to a pool deck. However, the applicant has not provided sufficient justification as to how development of the site is impractical without an increase to the permitted height from 30 feet to 58 feet (from base flood elevation to roof deck). 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The development proposal continues the trend of oversized buildings within the "Old Florida" District, which only serves to further erode the purpose of the "Old Florida" District as a transition area and will result in an additional building that will be out of scale with District. 3. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function, which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The design of the building is out of scale with surrounding buildings, the majority of which are one to three stories in height, and well below the proposed building height of 58 feet. The development proposal is contrary to the stated, desired form and function of the "Old Florida" District, which states that new single-family dwellings and townhouses are the preferred form of development within the District and that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. 4. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. The applicant has not provided sufficient justification that an increase to the permitted height from 30 feet to 58 feet (from base flood elevation to roof deck) provides a benefit to the community character, immediate vicinity, or the City as a whole. As previously stated, the development proposal will continue the trend of oversized buildings within the "Old Florida" District, which will only serve to further erode the purpose of the "Old Florida" District as a transition area, and will result in an additional building that will be out of scale with the District. Additionally, the development proposal does not meet the following General Applicability criteria: 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, coverage, density, and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. The development proposal consists of a building with height of 58 feet to the roof deck as measured from base flood elevation. The proposed height is inconsistent with a majority of the buildings in the "Old Florida" District. The proposal is Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05044 - 3 of 6 • 0 contrary to the purpose of the "Old Florida" District as a transition area between resort uses in Central Beach to the low intensity residential neighborhoods to the north of Acacia Street. 2. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. The community character of the immediate vicinity is attached dwellings (duplexes and triplexes) and single-family dwellings with heights varying between one and three stories; whereas the development proposal is for a condominium building 58 feet in height (as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck). Thus, the development proposal is inconsistent with the preferred form of development within the "Old Florida" District of single-family dwellings and townhouses, as well as being incompatible with the statement that building height should be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code. Code Enforcement Analysis: There are no outstanding Code Enforcement issues associated with this site. COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA (Sections 2-801.1 and 2-803): Standard Proposed Consistent Inconsistent Density 30 dwelling units per acre (20 dwelling units) 20 dwelling units X Impervious Surface Ratio 0.95 0.59 X Lot Area 5,000 - 10,000 s q. ft. 29,497 square feet (0.67 acres) X Lot Width 50 - 100 feet 297.53 feet X Height 35 feet 58 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck) X* Parking Spaces 1.5 spaces per unit (30 spaces) 37 spaces (1.85 spaces per unit) X Front Setback 0-15 feet South: 15 feet (to building) X Side Setback 0-10 feet East: 10 feet (to building) West: 10 feet (to building) X Rear 10-20 feet North: 20 feet (to building); and 3.33 feet (to pool deck) X* * See discussions under Analysis. COMPLIANCE WITH COMPREHENSIVE INFILL PROJECT FLEXIBILITY CRITERIA Consistent Inconsistent 1. The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and X* development standards. 2. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting X properties. 3. The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise X permitted in the City of Clearwater. 4. The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses. X 5. The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel X* proposed for development. Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05044 - 4 of 6 • i Consistent Inconsistent 6. The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the X* immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 7. Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate X* vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole. 8. Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street X parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. 9. The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist (T) District design X guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. * See discussion under Analysis. LU Consistent Inconsistent 1. The proposed development of the land will be in harmony with the scale, bulk, X* coverage, density and character of adjacent properties in which it is located. 2. The proposed development will not hinder or discourage development and use of adjacent land and buildings or significantly impair the value thereof. X 3. The proposed development will not adversely affect the health or safety of X persons residing or working in the neighborhood. 4. The proposed development is designed to minimize traffic congestion. X 5. The proposed development is consistent with the community character of the X* immediate vicinity. 6. The design of the proposed development minimizes adverse effects, including visual, acoustic and olfactory and hours of operation impacts on adjacent X * See discussion under Analysis. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION: The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the application and supporting materials on June 30, 2005. The Planning Department recommends DENIAL of the Flexible Development application to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist (T) District, with an increase to the permitted height from 35 feet to 58 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck), to increase the height of the parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, to reduce the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 3.33 feet (to pool deck), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C, based upon the following recommended findings of fact and recommended conclusions of law: Recommended Findings of Fact: 1. The 0.67 acre subject property is within the Tourist (T) District and the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use Plan category; 2. The subject property is located within the special area redevelopment plan, Beach by Design, as part of the "Old Florida" District; 3. Beach by Design identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development within the "Old Florida" District and further states that densities within the District should be generally limited to the density of existing improvements and that building height should Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05044 - 5 of 6 0 • be low to mid-rise in accordance with the Community Development Code, with "mid-rise" interpreted as having a maximum height of 50 feet based upon the height standards set forth in the Medium Density Residential (MDR), Tourist (T), and High Density Residential (HDR) Districts; 4. The subject property is currently developed with 8 attached dwellings and 11 overnight accommodation units; 5. The subject property is permitted a maximum of 20 attached dwelling units (30 du/ac); 6. The development proposal is consistent with the Community Development Code and the Future Land Use Plan category with regard to the maximum allowable density; 7. Adjacent properties are zoned Tourist (T) District, and developed with attached dwellings (duplexes and triplexes) and single-family dwellings with heights varying between one and three stories, with the surrounding area consisting of a mixture of attached dwellings and overnight accommodations; 8. The proposed height of the building is 58 feet as measured from base flood elevation to roof deck; 9. There are no pending Code Enforcement issues with these sites; 10. Staff finds that the development proposal does not meet General Applicability criteria 3-913.A.1 and 5; 11. Staff finds that the development proposal meets General Applicability criteria 3-913.A.2, 3, 4 and 6; 12. Staff finds that the development proposal does not meet Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria 2-803.C.1, 5, 6 and 7; and 13. Staff finds that the development proposal meets Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment criteria 2- 803.C.2, 3, 4, 8 and 9. Recommended Conclusions of Law: 1. The development proposal is not compatible with the surrounding area; 2. The development proposal does not comply with the "Old Florida" District of Beach by Design, which identifies new single-family dwellings and townhouses as the preferred form of development; 3. The development proposal does not comply with the Flexible Development criteria as a Comprehensive Infill Project per Section 2-803.C.1, 5, 6 and 7; and 4. The development proposal does not comply with other standards in the Code including the General Applicability Criteria per Section 3-913.A.1 and 5. Prepared by Planning Department Staff: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III ATTACHMENTS: Aerial Photograph of Site and Vicinity Location Map Future Land Use Map Zoning Atlas Map Application S: (Planning Departmen6C D BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next DROBay Esplanade 629 M3B Development (7) - MTMBay Esplanade 629 Staff Report. doc Staff Report - Community Development Board - August 16, 2005 Case FLD2005-05044 - 6 of 6 M ? 4 aT 0 ERA ST D n-W Off mmmo DV ao AG(AA S7 8i PROJECT SITE'LD o WD e o Y IEI YMM AO 4 KENDALL S aoa,A+wr y,N p??' SAYMONT ST &n m YEN pglif ? PAPAYA ST d ? Mg8A6E Z t < 8 P1. 00 o GM1IBB?! BW 1MNOWARD E Rq fIR87 87 0 ffif Location Map Owner. TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Site: 629 Bay Esplanade Property Size(Acres): 0.677 PIN: 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A N Aerial Photograph Owner. I TSETSE, LLC I Case: FLD2005-05044 I Site: 1629 Bay Esplanade I Property I 0.677 I Size(Acres): PIN: Atlas Page: 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110 258A N w 884 -- -----_- - f 1---__--2 1665 `r 881 '? I 88d 881 I 881 ; j rw+r r I I A I --- - 10 \; - 7 ? 1 m -,871?'-,? I ilk 1--? I 1 ; Jr-r?4 ? I'-008 r- co I --? r 1 I E I I 844 -- r, L-A 1 ! 838 1 _ _ % ?- r-? I T ? I 891~ r,-. \ ?,\ ?\ Bd9 j 4 ?? r'?? -- 81fl l ) I ? 11 ?1 I ? 11 ? ail I ??.. i 5 - 60 i 0 1 I 18 ? (( ?-?.-iI 1 L_ _ 1611 y osrR `R 817 `rN ,l 6Q8 ' _ 1 11 BOSS a r__ T I 1 1 L_. j _.dOb N I -I , 3 I _ ?Q I 1 1 1 605 !3 I - 3 I I 9•-? ? r I I -- I I 1 f I 1 , i 1 __ 1 581 I I I I ?L: i --'\ -- 9 I -= 1 j 7 5 604 g 5 Wo I -l j t 5 r, -- _ I 1588 I 1 1 1 t I--? 1-'I, I - 1 Zoning Map Owner. TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Property Site: 629 Bay Esplanade 0.677 Size(Acres) : 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, PIN: 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A N • --- L I 661 _ 657; --- 09 I 661 ! RFH a ------ ? 1 I --, r i I L I j __ 64 ----, -?` - S I I I" ?_) _ I tp, I I zj i J't ; ? , Z ` t 699 ? v ROYAL WAY 636 WATER JVH T ? Tf 529 ? M 6{t1 i ?1 61f j j ! II I I i j 1 j 11 ?? I ??" O RFJ f -161 14 6 , RIOS Z r t tl 1 617?- ?? -- t' D '- 1 n y I I I 605 -J D mss-.. - 6sa ? ?, I ' 1 JUAN?TA WAY g- ' v TfU 560 --' 666 571 1 I I I I , 1 I-, ? 55] S, , -, Future Land Use Map Owner. TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Site: 1 629 Bay Esplanade Property 0.677 Size (Acres) : 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, PIN: 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A a • _-J?2 ' - - - he 68 _ = _ -- 1 •n m S81 1 057 681 1 ached ; a • o _ ' 1& r------1 t , tau an i -, - j-L _ 'L- i I m it:' ---- L --J 84 4 - 64 1 I _ r. E 1 I \ l 1 ? L 9 A ' r / el dati 's e , I , 1 ROYAL WAY ! Tjs1 dr \ r 1 !? 1 l i i t Q I! ?I I e f ? fo I ?/'\ . 11 I ? 1 Z, I 622' ' Q11 ti , \ ??, • y 1 1611 1 ?J~t'- '9 ; 1? - 1 l f 1 h ll Park z - j ?7 -' • n rr60? ?8 w Im I 1 I O -_ , r- i cg n BQB-1 i i_ D -- 6111 ? Y 1 i A W5 A 1--- I 1 ' 584 --J7 C 403 '--1 JUANITA WAY r1&- ? r ; ? PIace10 --' I 579 ? Park 1 0 on ; worship 79 __, W0 _ 566 571 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner: TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Site: 629 Bay Esplanade Property 0.677 Size(Acres): PIN: 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A so View looking northeast. R View looking northwest jamb .ilk... • f' View looking north. View looking northwest. View looking north. Venetian Pointe Condominiums FLD2005-05044 629 Bay Esplanade View looking west. 0 0 M-F-P Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case No. FLD Z,(9?0s - tiSX?q Meeting Date: 4 9 Location: t W (/7"f) c ? Current Use: /Active Code Enforcement Case no) yes: Address numb r (yes no) (vacant land) Nj? Landscapin (yes (no) Q? )<'Overgrown (yes) . o) ?p Debris (yes) (no Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes)r(no Building(s,Y 6(goo (fir) (poor) (vacant land) kA, Fencing ??/(good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) Paint good (fair (poor) (garish) -?q Grass Parking (yes) no) Residential Parking Violations (ye Signage (ok) (billbo Parking (n/a) (striped) (hand'cap?ped? Dumpster (enclosed) of enclosed ' Outdoor storage (yes) no) s) no) ard) (needs repaving) fVt4 ?S Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): oee,f Date: 6/U/05-Reviewed Telephone: `S0 a L/7d S`J Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 • ?SPLp,%ADE i5 S s m 2x2 Map Owner. TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Site: 629 Bay Esplanade Property 0.677 Size(Acres): PIN: 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A 0 0 KIPLING S° (YRDEfdA gT `0a??ff a T MAWO ID ve w a 0 ASTER o ALGA ST fi S' PROJECT ° a 0 a SITE LD E !£LNM O 4 AVAIAN r s O .ISib 1.'O?'j C l'? 0 wM ? P ROtltuMY SAYMONT ST ftfP ?Ty( PAPAYA ST s OOR'? PAS E D ` 8 Pae'°° O ca?..r BNd E A? Q gR3T ST 0 Location Map Owner. TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Site: 629 Bay Esplanade Property Size(Acres): 0.677 PIN: 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A • • Aerial Photograph Owner. I TSETSE, LLC I Case: I FLD2005-05044 I Site: 1629 Bay Esplanade I Property I 0.677 Size(Acres): PIN: Atlas Page: 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110 258A r? u • I I . t -< 684 _ m -- --- I- 4 1 I 657 1 1 "9 661 I I RFH 1 661 1 /+r??rv -----j ILL ' ------ D m ,- sx?- I 1 _-? r I -rt_I tir ?y, 1 L? _ ^ ? I I ? 644 =- 64 -I I I --L I I 6411= 1.-ty? ? t 4?--, `?^• ? -- - r _ I 639 via - 1 i \ 1 i 1 L / V ROYAL WAY ' 838 WATER TI 889 D 1 632 ?.? I b y - ? ---, ? ? ? i I I i I I -I Q it a; 1 620 2 ' . , ' M S 1 -?-,I , & _ acU It1?-F7 I H 121 r? __-,1 j 6141 Z rB0 1 648 i 617 6081 I - t 1 c) 1 r .r-- D .. t 1 - 1 1 605 y 1 - 1 I j -? -? ---? D §8 3 m _ 5V D ` Z JUANITA WAY ---, -,? ' l ----- `' -' 1 = m ; -__ r INS ^ -- 1 L 804 rl ? i T/U 560 6 1 I I I 5 1 t -r' _ - t 1 I _---' 568 571 1 I I-, -59F_» 1 -t Future Land Use Map Owner. TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Site: 629 Bay Esplanade Property 0.677 Size(Acres): PIN: 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A • • I ------' 1 1 i m 6571 ---08 I - Z ILL I 41-1 -- li? ??i _I I cp "IS 7 r-t 639 ' _ r I 831-^-, ?, 639 ; 4 ?+? ????? 613 ' ?? .` I 11 1 I I I I I i ' _ N 1 ?1 I 1 ? 1 1632'1 ---I r6 ? ? ; 029 W •? is 50 I 18 ((?-`-,1 `-- Q11 ? I' 4 fl 'mo`t": 6121 Lfi'U" 61 -, 1 BOSt r-- T 0S/ll ?r60-1?l 646 617 I 611 _ I - r l `< L j j 1 ro - $ 10 fn J, ? J V I ' Q N 1 1 t 1 605 56a D ` J ? ;65 ?- I 1 9--- ? r 1 11 r 1 1 i _ 581 I I I I ^---t -- ?? 1 T 1 I t I 579 1 - -- I --t L 1 1 804 79 1 l/ 1 I L _ I ?? I r I - gg g 560 5 1 I ' -lI ; ?r? 11 - - 586 5Z Zoning Map Owner: TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Property Site: 629 Bay Esplanade 0.677 Size(Acres) : 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, PIN: 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A • • I 1 I I I -.__? 60 11 --- L Ihje lint i---r-?_r-- I l'r I sm, I ._Z I 6571 661 ittached ; D I o f - r I 2 . -#s 1 stau `ant -' - - -_ v -F -t _ -- 1 - m ----- ? ----- 13% ?... ?- 844 Bfa , „ I I I 1 1_ \ - e r-' -I / so ` I i d . ROYAL WAY ,tta e86 '?---,? Q ° I `n -- -- 8? 1 1 dNI ? ? If f I( ' ?I E22'I Q Q 1 1 ? ---, If ? ?f f A?w ^?, ? ?' 1 ^ j z I 62S 0 18 1 I ? v i I - '? '-1611 ? , h ? Park U) ; 1 __ p 1 4 ?r-- ? ?` + 1- i `? 819 -- ' I 1 I 1 ; ; 9 l _?OSJ ' , _J 1 1 t 1 } ?a1 1 I 605 _ _J ?8fr i 584 A `I - 1? j LI Z _? -, C 9 --1 f - JUANITA WAY r lit PYace o - --' 1 1 57g -- ? ; , J' Park 79L, on ; worsbip 580 1 ' -lI _ i ?r, 1 ;W8 571 Existing Surrounding Uses Map Owner. TSETSE, LLC Case: FLD2005-05044 Site: 629 Bay Esplanade Property 0.677 Size(Acres): PIN: 05-29-15-54756-078-0080, 0090, 0100 and 0110 Atlas Page: 258A 0 0 View looking northeast View looking north. w looking west. View looking northwest dir. View looking north. View looking northwest Venetian Pointe Condominiums FLD2005-05044 629 Bay Esplanade 1 n1TEl , ,a _ _ _ • r I- J .•.? __ T _ ?_? ' 8 ii 1 n I 1 ' ul tr FT. 62 J L a Esplanade I - ' - l „ -t - _ 1 ! ----------------- - p Clearwater U - _ PREPARED BY J ^ 1 1 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION -, I\ FLD2005-05044 r \ IT T?' a ? - 11 x M L _ ENGINEERING I GIs 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph.:(727)562-4750,Fax: (727)526.4755 www.MyClearwateccom . J LaaJ• J , l /f - 1 P,la: mrcmW.,or. oah hhxnafis:•.r bna=:trd?be,?w!a• r'uC.M YXVira Ad•mxLVGC^by,?ee•r+p. aw nHpl l,t u.e?!eC i ,I. ?n„_3:. 9 • / r i , 1 s l I i I,. • • ` 4C:.'dM:Yx.. rK;,eM wY, ^,a ,maan'rw?9 Mar +tl Mb M1`Cnxtl xaJ tt'w:aw h'Ce F'+:aaa C•CYmoanC FP'aanc I I I ; II f l 1 _ ' ? rhFYncras'noJrryy Rs swi r.e ^.My a' Gkw?w.:hviVA.E T LIJ.HJ - I T FT ) I ? 1" mee.J /w xNfLt'1FS FW?raa'a a',?,eU m,x.-ag M. rc_lrw.'Y. carro,Merasa a:r.b,1). arJUhGh:/dfsMwAf COLS: oaJaRar.Ja finM'rro•e. !^a G(v d (:'WaYi P RYkE I i I• j r - ?( aJ•n^ea nn •'hEPy vAefJd.e'se+x!dee xrM !M :.n N rr'..suea dwcn naa. `tTila M ' I I ? C4 ERU 3T. x - ? ? F L ,iJ = 1 i I _ IAFMID - ~. - - y '1-^T? / ? -DR JP k0u.. Ca+w, RaJxmla •:MJF -y'.brrY f i a,e i?1lr•14 r I // 8 __ ? t'` S +d1 - YM Oarat; iw6 W -Maaaa-ISrw-aM GLCNJALF P.4, ix i `ano ?u',._ r---' Lown•e11cIAL JISTRI;.T; :s?LU?szdma.Ts p. plp wT.ln u.wi I+w.v, a.x rte, w.y, *-r r o TMm 1. fnaAlao,w c4' c i xnLn.ao I r- N 4 City Owned Properly Agreement to Annex ® E I j ^' I r I Annexation Deannexation E sj AVA-or " ?\ < I I _._ Correct on Rezoning SUB1JUM8ERj•-Rafarw Pap 6 I r<e cui • Z: `/ ._ ' j I BLOCK NUMBER 9UB PARCEL NUMBER 1 - . _ a •. ,. _1 '', .- ._ _.. .. - J ?•':? PARCEL NUMBER (Ma31 I am =sv• - t LAND HOOK ;COMMON OWNERSHIP) L e J a I O S R ' I' • - / Y rr PLATTED StSDIVISICA BOUNDARY COUNTY HIGHWA`r OS/R P )°^o, S'A7EHIGHWAY 1 -AWAY n 1 S y U.S -IGHVVAY I ? J r I I i . I r,. i I , I' ` = r - -, 1Ja Outside City of Clearwater L . , .', aaa0 _._ Zoning Atlas ---T --•- -- K ----- ------- ------ ---- --- Mar 21. 2005 •Ji r - -) e1 SW 114 of 5.29-15 14. ? 1-- 1 ?I! L 258A • 0 257A 629 _Bay Esplanade _ FLD2005-05044 L434J r- - `erlJf P I r r naTE: r r- JI k_?_ __ e _ - ?$, I n t 9T yI TI- _ _.t.{ ? F_ ? ? --1 ? Y i?l • ?I I ,?, .vy1/y 1--111 \ +r.K.. L R bT. ? I `ee+• J , , I - I l m II. • I' F, -1 t I I ?.; .. C BRU JT. x?. •? - 1 ? ?? ? IJIEM ` ID 1- 0066" ? L GLLNJKf __ I -- J , ?NIIe r _l ??++dd `. I MJLMi:JP _ . 6NJe ?1' 01 r--.d T----- _ I % L any r 1 a l I :„ , f rf I I LJnJ. I IY I Lfi1Yr J f e Im OS/R OS/ R P I I_01+_ J r- - -t 1- - - -H-.R - - LLLO_ J ` e J Clearwater PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING I GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph.: (727)6624760, Fax: (727)626.4766 www.MyClearvvater.com pM.va'+ae- P..x: nYU?nR1Pr, wb b lnnanel.'.. tie G?fY M Gb+.x+W ?eC NO'RS A3ru.aga5cr;'EfpneearC pnJ nettW +CCµfad M^;.Yell •_Y Me eHfpenf W fi ele ?Nla,Y'NK•11D I.+M'M d+f+ ,ece.vea naa _c AI 'npp6ay A -Y As CI J-tav, ft (1t) terry c, a' G W 1V., a a PW'NE Nhailn?C .2 mNN r,o Rwi'M+bee es0'esu: w 1'N C cv.ro.^Inq tM .acv carroiMSr'es+ .a fuTnwm?• - ft G•+a QeYt^. PWAenr cM?uacabr:•N aC+ 7/G's'+sMe. PWNE n?i4Edi1'rAN r+: uc+t?MM MrT fN :.pew MMMs Y •ivcn tleb. /NN? way ¢F . S aFbl[,ENTILL DNiTRif, 9 -DR .o-. Ga rvt R.rlsrWl J: JR -m Maeur Ca.Mf Ra.IOnS/ JWbP^ Rr.H',p?%ana'ICmr+aem 4.+br C•v tl I@1C??-U+bfP ayaf•w.ss C: aarrwm -o1.Rl•FRCInI ?IgTRh'.T^u GPEC nl l.9f dLTR:.TS .'.-Oha iRT. be We+.Rwa.'sM1 are Tac+xber T.Tw trn Ibnl.RYVVI •-li'e'vldY 06R.Gw 3Pr.Aav.+rb-e J OcxnMm P.Mw-n+en+n. • City Owned Property Agreement to Annex Annexation Deannexation Correction Rezoning 1 SUB NLMBER ' R f P t : ( - e erm la ) ? /// BLOCK NLMBER ?? l+ SUB PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER IMa31 III LAND NOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP, -' PLATTED S(BDNISION BOUNDARY 1-1 COUNTY -IGHWA" SATE HIGHWAY fe 1 U.S -IGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Mar 21, 2005 SW 114 of 5-29-15 258A 629 Bay Esplanade FLD2005-05044 Lua r - `nJSs rA/ P I t i I / I I (Ls1sTJ i Af.Af.N L 9flvT 57 ?' ao6l?"`'1`--`J i x r I F J ? _ II I '- - IT FMID :r, , CL[NJALE ? r ___ }P_ 7- l '.w 41 I IIEILw.m ?_ _ E se L°J L,v ANwt-•• P or -II a I f?1 . J, I ! I 0S/R +LaxAwAr s7 I LJ - ' T g? I-R `r 1 r-•- -, li - r-? II Cur J ?ri7A OS/R P Clearwater PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING 1019 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33755 Ph.: (727)562-4750. Fax: (727)526-4755 www.MyC]earwater.com nxlm-c- P.A:,tVU,ndw, w/Y a 4vnYM.'.v M ='4 N CM.'w/Y• I'Wtk /Yp,q ptlnwst'?JG.'Y&gY!K/1? Ori nYR W P«KAAA wf :.Y/C ^_Y rIM TwpYY R>n !!N rJw/r1's•WJp 1!!M ASI Nb rK/.xtlrni:CW:bO N'Fle F::xe VV V• a cw'Mp/Pww" r rh n'an.!nNnpJT. ASJtwn, rle w'Cbprw.;roY reWA/E nhc?iRnM1 sywsJM U'? Nwe iMEn.^MI>t M! -.?r/.'Y /fR.•gs/. /d.Y.y. ru'?A:/yrRN J/pW Mry aJp.• wrrrcWr.w heMrorm.MV. t`.e Gy d G'u,w/te. PWA•E ne A/LJ.`l'rMAra/w.• uaot!/ron wro'r !M w',ucn Gf/. ARAAN w ?F 5 2:•x'ENTIAL DL?TRC-1 u. Fr.vr4 J)R wan •A'J,tlsi RA :ANSO Coaenwn Poch ,W atrmE Cmrnlm r)>.LY 6R a IENCGJ fnrNUyr G?w n`wrGraaa. C:-+swwron :/XI?'ERC?AL -JI`1TRAC1; `YEC 4 L'JE W:ITR ;TS ?.pk. iRT. Neub4.Rw., xA.ra Tr.?,elq. T 1.1 ?1NMY - r<mwrur 0&R.C bassFwrb-s J-[...nnm .Inx-.MSa 4w, City Owned Property Agreement to Annex Annexation Deannexation Correction Rezoning C°"A ] SUB VJWBER j'-R/brw Pnq ?? BLOCK NUMBER SLIB PARCEL NUMFIER (!lru? PARCEL NUMBER IM881 LAND HOOK (COMMON OWNERSHIP) - PUTTED SLSDrVISICn BOUNDARY COUNTY I-IGHWA? ((-11 S7ATE HIGHWAY ;E U.S. -IGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Mar 21, 2005 SW 114 of 5-29-15 258A • • _- I T 4Y ! ST. 629_ Bay Esplanade I =1 _____ s I y_ :. FLD2005-05044 L I l A (V I `•3M i9eT ST Cc?l• h I I Cl[NJMi'• - J 1 i y.. - r aaaaal i I I "? ?txJ,A'NAY eT IL.,o,k I, - T I f `as_ -l I, 7A7A L ?f.e en ?n ? r ?_ e T? II?,I ,_ a ? ) Il i ? r u sn z ,LJ?IW? r _ .1 L ? J `auu J - -HDR F C- r--'L'- J . OS/ R I P z Cleanv ater PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING I GIS 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756 Ph.:(727)562.4700,Fax: (72T)528.4768 www.MyClearwater.com Y'LIzA.-YYniro AlnwkLOSa.^.'F W;nearry. nq nvn ire ac..W Wd •nl _rW!yn,e rortASn Yp ,erMY,pM +a N,4 e crr..rwnvYA He bd- 'm%PbYNE >iO wm?YYMS e+,»isel AnP"aC mm;e^Np Me ?Yr•c/" [NgNe,^!Y 'enM.A) rb Ai d hi 0lp> oMe: ?.W:eE lwMnr?re. t"e G4 dGerwNe?PW" e? iYEe:Y vANto•M: atex.'ebe Y.vM rM :.ke e. ?r.U,ue de,.mer. ?ANP W T F S aex?rnuE as,as-; T•oa ? Y.s.. c.,>r, n..ern. YNx. . A•.ew ? y? ?..w, a?r.,'eM • A'e??em'M :AM:[IG FwQe'MprwMVe(,m>raelm fn?Ny' a ?FNC.J - _ .Yxs?v+v.•w,.a C: wrvrm P.Ly G w xi xA?n'mnx>ISnacrs .a.c K?,: usTa cTs .'.. p%• iPT.,rv u>MM. PekeeTfi ke TN+MOpe T I In1rbW 10 City Owned Property Agreement to Annex Annexation Deannexation Correction Rezoning E- :1 SUB UJMBER (• - R.W w Put) BLOCK NUMBER \) SUB PARCEL NUMBER PARCEL NUMBER IM831 ? LAND HOOK;COMMON OWNERSHIP, PLATTED SUPDNISION BOUNDARY 000NTYFIGHWA- S-ATE HIGMVAY 9 U.8. MGHWAY Outside City of Clearwater Zoning Atlas Mar 21. 2005 SW 114 of 5-29-15 258A 0 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER NOTICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD PUBLIC HEARINGS The Community Development Board of the City of Clearwater, Florida, will hold public hearings on Tuesday, August 16, 2005, beginning at 1:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, in City Hall, 3rd floor, 112 South Osceola Ave, Clearwater, Florida, to consider the following requests: NOTE: All persons wishing to address an item need to be present at the BEGINNING of the meeting. Those cases that are not contested by the applicant, staff, neighboring property owners, etc. will be placed on a consent agenda and approved by a single vote at the beginning of the meeting. 1. (Cont from 07-19-05) Home Energy, LLC. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.63 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 feet (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the rear (east) setback from 15 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 43.17 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 5.5 ft (from roof deck) and an additional 13.67 ft for an open rooftop pavilion (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.17, with reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 12 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 8 feet (to pavement) and reductions to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to patios) and from 10 ft to 7.6 ft (to pavement), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [4 townhomes and 16 condominiums]) at 415 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 17 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-04035 2. (Cont from 07-19-05) Beach & Gulf Sands, Inc., & North Clearwater Beach Development (Anthony Menna) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 13 attached dwellings in the Tourist District and an increase in ht from 35 ft to 64 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches, permit 2 parking spaces within the required sight visibility triangles along Bay Esplanade, a reduction in the front (north) setback from 15 ft to 5 ft (to pavement) and 3 ft (to trash staging area), reduction in the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to pool deck), 10 ft (to pool) and 7 ft (to building), reduction in the side (west) setback from 10 ft to 3 feet (to trash staging area) and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to zero ft to pool deck, 8 ft (to pool) and 10 ft (to building), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C., Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-03019) of 2 dwelling units from 116 Brightwater Dr (donor site) to 657 Bay Esplanade (receiver site) under the provisions of Sec's 4- 1402 and 4-1403 and a request for Termination of Status of Nonconformity under the provisions of Sec 6-109. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [13 condominium units]) at 657 & 663 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 4 & 5. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-03032/TDR2005-03019 3. Religious Community Services, Inc. (The Haven of RCS) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit a white PVC fence 6 ft in ht within the front (east) setback along • North Saturn Ave without substantial grill work and masonry columns and without a 3 foot wide landscape strip on the street side of the fence as otherwise required by Sec's 3-804.A.1 and 3 on a • property within the Medium Density Residential (MDR) district, as part of a Residential Infill Project under the provisions of Sec 2-304.G. (Proposed Use: Community Residential Homes) at 1520 N Saturn Ave, Sec 02-29-15, M&B 44.01. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05038 4. Ardent International Ltd Liability Co, Panayiotis Vasiloudes, and Helen Vasiloudes (M3B Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 14 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 59 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (south) setback from 20 ft to 7 ft to pool deck and 11 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 651 & 655 Bay Esplanade and 50 Royal Way, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 77, Lots 1-3. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05043 5. TSE TSE, LLC (M3B Development, LLC/Robert Szasz) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist District, an increase in ht from 35 ft to 58 ft (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the ht of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (north) setback from 20 ft to 3.33 ft to pool deck and 6 ft (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached Dwellings) at 629, 635 & 637 Bay Esplanade, Mandalay Unit No. 5 Replat Blk 78, Lots 8-11 & Rip Rts. Assigned Planner: o ert=G:-Teffl, PYar lfl? FLD2005-05044 6. First Baptist Church of Clearwater (Opus South Corporation, Opus South Contractor's LLC/John Franklin Wade) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow a mixed-use development of 157 attached dwelling units (which includes an increase in density of 31 dwelling units from the Clearwater Downtown Redevelopment Plan Public Amenities Incentive Pool) and 10,022 sq ft of non-residential use, with an increase to the permitted ht from 30 ft to 2.71 ft (to roof deck) and an additional 22 ft for architectural embellishments and mechanical equipment (from roof deck), to reduce the non-residential parking requirement from 41 parking spaces to zero (0) parking spaces, and to allow a building within the required sight visibility triangle at the intersection of Cleveland St and North Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-903.C., and to eliminate the required foundation landscaping along N Osceola Ave, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Mixed-use [169 attached dwellings and 10,022 sq ft non- residential floor area]) at 331 Cleveland St, John R Davey's Resub Blk A, Part of Lots 1-3 & unplatted parcel. Assigned Planner: Robert G. Tefft, Planner III. FLD2005-05048 7. Clearwater Land Ltd (Druid Courtyard Clearwater, LLC/Nicholas F Ferraioli) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit 47 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (north) setback from 25 ft to 10 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 18.5 ft (to pavement), reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 4 ft (to entry feature columns) and from 25 ft to 15 ft (to pavement and pool deck), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to entry feature column), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 1.9 ft (to entry feature column) and an increase to building ht from 30 ft to 55 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets, under the provisions of Sec 2-504.A. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [47 condominiums]) at 1105 Druid Rd, Sec 15-29-15, M&B 34.03. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP. FLD2005-05037 I '1 9 • 14 8. Religious Community Services, Inc. is requesting a Flexible Development approval to permit the expansion and renovation of floor area of an existing social/public service agency with a reduction to lot width from 100 ft to 58 ft (along Myrtle Ave), a reduction to the front (south along Druid Rd) setback from 25 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the front (east along Myrtle Ave) setback from 25 ft to 15 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the side (east) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to the side (west) setback from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-704.C, with a reduction to the landscape buffer along Druid Rd (south) from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the east from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the west from 5 ft to zero ft (to existing pavement), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north from 10 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and a reduction to interior landscape area from 10 percent to 7.4 percent, as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Expansion and renovation of the RCS food bank) at 700 Druid Rd, Magnolia Park, Blk 26, Lots 9 & 10 & parts of Lots 1-5 & 8. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05046 9. Ronald and Karen Kozan (Newkirk Ventures, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (26 existing and proposed attached dwelling units; 20 dwelling units maximum under land use category), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 26 attached dwelling units with a reduction to the minimum lot width from 150 ft to 144.65 ft, reductions to the front (west) setback from 25 ft to 23 ft (to building) from 25 ft to 20 ft (to balcony), from 25 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 25 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk), reductions to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 6.1 ft (to balconies) and from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk) and an increase to building height from 30 ft to 46 ft (to roof deck) with perimeter parapets of 6 ft (from roof deck), as a Residential Infill Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-404.F, and reductions to the landscape buffer along Island Way from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the landscape buffer along the north side from 10 ft to 5.4 ft (to sidewalk) and a reduction to the landscape buffer along the south side from 10 ft to 5 ft (to sidewalk), as a Comprehensive Landscape Program, under the provisions of Sec 3-1202.G. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [26 condominiums]) at 405 Island Way, Island Estates of Clearwater, Unit 2, Lot 15 and part of Lot 16. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05045 10. Camille Courtney & Elina Honicky (Henry C. Kyle, III & Robert Elder) are requesting a Flexible Development approval to allow an addition to an existing single-family residence with a reduction to the front setback from 25 ft to 20.3 ft (to building), under the provisions of Sec 2- 304.G. (Proposed Use: Detached Dwelling) at 1415 San Juan Court, Blvd Heights, Blk K, Lot 17 and part of Lot 18. Assigned Planner: John Schodtler, Planner I. FLD2005-05052 11. DiVello Land Trust, Fulvio DiVello Trustee (Maddalina DiVello & Housh Ghovaee, Northside Engineering Services, Inc.) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (111 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 83 dwelling units), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit 83 attached dwellings with reductions to the front (south along S. Gulfview Blvd.) setback from 15 ft to 10 ft (to pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the front (west along Hamden Dr) from 15 ft to 12.5 ft (to building and proposed pavement), from 15 ft to 5 ft (to existing pavement) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) from 10 ft to 3 ft (to existing pavement) and from 10 ft to zero ft (to existing pool deck), an increase to building height from 35 ft to 100 ft (to roof deck) with an additional 7 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 22.5 ft for elevator and stair towers (from roof deck) and a deviation to allow direct access to an arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C. (Proposed Use: Attached dwellings [83 condominiums]) at 445 Hamden Dr and 504 S Gulfview Blvd, Columbia Sub No. 5, Lots 4-11, and RIP rts and land adj to Lot 11. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005-05051 12. TW/Beach Residences - Clearwater, LLC (E. D. Armstrong III, Esq., Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP) are requesting (1) Termination of Status of Nonconformity for density (217 overnight accommodation units existing to be converted to 112 dwelling units; where 56 dwelling units are permitted today), under the provisions of Sec 6-109; (2) Flexible Development approval to permit a mixed use of 112 attached dwelling units, 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales with reductions to the front (east) setback from 15 ft to 6 ft (to patios/seating areas) and from 15 ft to zero ft (to trash staging area), reductions to the side (north) setback from 10 ft to 5 ft from the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) (to building) and from 10 ft to 4 ft (to pavement), a reduction to the side (south) setback from 10 ft to 2 ft (to trash staging area), a reduction to the rear (west) setback from 20 ft to 8 ft from the CCCL (to building), increases to building height from 35 ft 100 ft for the overnight accommodation building tower and from 35 ft to 150 ft for the residential tower (to roof deck) with an additional 6 ft for perimeter parapets (from roof deck) and an additional 24 ft for architectural embellishments (from roof deck), a reduction to driveway spacing from 125 ft to 90 ft and a deviation to allow direct access to a arterial street, as a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project, under the provisions of Sec 2-803.C; and (3) Transfer of Development Rights (TDR2005-05022) of 4 dwelling units from 557 and 579 Cyprus Ave, 2 dwelling units from 625-627 Bay Esplanade, 2 dwelling units from 665 Bay Esplanade and 3 dwelling units • from 667 Bay Esplanade, under the provisions of Sec 4-1402. (Proposed Use: Mixed use of 112 attached dwellings [condominiums], 78 overnight accommodation rooms/units and 2,910 sq ft of retail sales) at 430 South Gulfview Blvd, Lloyd-White-Skinner Sub, Lots 33-35, part of Lot 36 and subm land on W. Assigned Planner: Wayne M. Wells, AICP, Planner III. FLD2005- 05047/TDR2005-05022 Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearings or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Interested parties may appear and be heard at the hearing or file written notice of approval or objection with the Planning Director or City Clerk prior to the hearing. Any person who decides to appeal any decision made by the Board or Council, with respect to any matter considered at such hearings, will need to request a record of the proceedings and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based per Florida Statute 286.0105. Community Development Code Sec 4-206 states that party status shall be granted by the Board in quasi-judicial cases if the person requesting such status demonstrates that s/he is substantially affected. Party status entitles parties to personally testify, present evidence, argument and witnesses, cross-examine witnesses, appeal the decision and speak on reconsideration requests, and needs to be requested and obtained during the case discussion before the CDB. An oath will be administered swearing in all persons giving testimony in quasi-judicial public hearing cases. If you wish to speak at the meeting, please wait to be recognized, then state and spell your name and provide your address. Persons without party status speaking before the CDB shall be limited to three minutes unless an individual is representing a group in which case the Chairperson may authorize a reasonable amount of time up to 10 minutes. is Five days prior to the meeting, staff reports and recommendations on the above requests will be • available for review by interested parties between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., weekdays, at the City of Clearwater, Planning Department, 100 S. Myrtle Ave., Clearwater, FL 33756. Please contact the case presenter, at 562-4567 to discuss any questions or concerns about the project and/or to better understand the proposal and review the site plan. Michael Delk Planning Director Cynthia E. Goudeau, CMC City Clerk City of Clearwater P.O. Box 4748, Clearwater, FL 33758-4748 NOTE: Applicant or representative must be present at the hearing. A COPY OF THIS AD IN LARGE PRINT IS AVAILABLE IN OFFICIAL RECORDS AND LEGISLATIVE SERVICES. ANY PERSON WITH A DISABILITY REQUIRING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CALL (727) 562-4093 WITH THEIR REQUEST. Ad: 07/31/05 0 i i Community Response Team Planning Dept. Cases - DRC Case NoBlaon- Cub C1 Meeting Date: T? Location: ? Currer ? Active Code Enforcement Case & yes: ? Address number ( es (no) (vacant land) ? Landscaping (,S69) (no) qcz4 ? Overgrown (yes) no ? Debris (yes) ? Inoperative vehicle(s) (yes) ? Building(s) (good) air (poor) (vacant land) ? Fencing' ( o) (good) (dilapidated) (broken and/or missing pieces) ? Paint ood (fair) (poor) (garish) ? Grass Parking (yes)i ) ? Residential Parking Violations (yes) ne ? Signage (none) & (not ok) (billboard) ? Parking (n/a) (striped) (handicapped) (needs repaving) (C) ? Dumpster (enclosed) of enclose ? -Outdoor storage (yes) Comments/Status Report (attach any pertinent documents): Date:.? CCU Reviewed by: i 11CL Telephone: Revised 03-29-01; 02-04-03 `'0o r7 FLD2005-05044 = 107 108 5TH ST LLC 166363 ONTARIO LTD ALBRECHT, YVETTE 9 SUNSET BAY DR 152 CLARENDON ST 16 ASHENDEN WALK BELLEAIR FL 33756 - SOUTHAMPTON ON NOH 21-0 00030 - FARNHAM COMMON BUCKS SL2 CANADA 3UF 00009 - UNITED KINGDOM ANDRESON,DEAN ANDRESON,ANN 2046.BRENDLA RD CLEARWATER FL 33755 - ARDENT INTERNATIONAL LTD LIABI 2840 EAST BAY DR # 363 LARGO FL 33771 - 2408 ARMBRUSTER, JOHN 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 209 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 BANNON, MARY KATHLEEN TRUST 8013 WILDWOOD LN DARIEN IL 60561 - 5914 BAY ESPLANADE 617 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 BEARDSLEY, JAMES M 15 MAYFAIR LN BUFFALO NY 14201 - 1522 BOYES, JAMES R BOYES, GEORGIA 969 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1013 CHARBONEAU, RENEE A 9342 HIDDEN WATER CIR RIVERVIEW FL 33569 - 3031 CLEARWATER NEIGHBORHOODS COALITION DOUG WILLIAMS, PRESIDENT 2544 FRISCO DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33761 DANNA, MARK A 584 BAY ESPLANADE # 3 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 BAY ESPLANADE AT CLEARWATER BE 2110 DREW ST # 100 CLEARWATER FL 33765 - 3231 BAYESPLANADE.COM LLC 627 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - BERETA, STANLEY D THE 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 203 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 CASWELL LLC 949 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CIUCEVICH, JOSEPH 736 BRUCE AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1418 COATES I INC 873 ISLAND WAY CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1826 D'ARRIGO, STEPHEN V 11 ARLENE AVE WILMINGTON MA 02476 - 4131 BAY ESPLANADE CONDO ASSN 584 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 BEACH & GULF SANDS INC 657 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1515 BORUTA, SCOTT V 611 POINSETTIA AVE # 101 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CHAPEL BY SEA CLEARWATER BCH C 54 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1607 CLEARWATER BEACH ASSOCIATION JAY KEYES 100 DEVON DRIVE CLEARWATER, FL 33767 CZIPRI, BRENDA K THE 334 EAST LAKE RD STE 338 PALM HARBOR FL 34685 - 2427 DE BENEDITTIS, FRANK DE BENEDITTIS, NANCY 4602 104TH ST CORONA NY 11368 - 2813 DEAN REAL ESTATE INV INC DI DOMIZIO INVESTMENTS INC DIGIACOMO, MICHAEL 647 BAY ESPLANADE 90 MILVAN DR DIGIACOMO, LESLIE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1617 TORONTO ON M91- 1Z6 00030 - PO BOX 561 CANADA KIMBERTON PA 19442 - EYLER, CYNTHIA A HOLDEN, DONNA L 554 ADALINE AVE VANDALIA OH 45377 - 1802 FIVE PALM CONDO ASSN INC 673 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 FOLEY, DONALD F FOLEY, CATHERINE G 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 108 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 GTE FLORIDA INCORPORATED PO BOX 152206 IRVING TX 75015 - 2206 HESS, PAULINE D TRUST HESS, STEPHEN T 819 HARBOR ISL CLEARWATER FL 33767 - JAKSCH, ROBERT W 1596 SHIRLEY PL LARGO FL 33770 - 2218 KIELMANN, LOTHAR E KIELMANN, WENDY 35154 LEON ST LIVONIA MI 48150 - 2668 KROMER, JOHN KROMER, JANET 10317 GREEN LINKS DR TAMPA FL 33626 - LETOURNEAU, WILLIAM T HIRSCH, DEBORA A 395 16TH ST NEWPORT MN 55055 - 1061 EYLER, DONALD C EYLER, CYNTHIA A 554 ADALINE AVE VAN DALIA OH 45377 - 1802 FLORENCE ENTERPRISES 603 INDIAN ROCKS RD BELLEAIR FL 33756 - 2056 FRANKS, VIRGINIA B 669 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1503 H & HS BEACH PLACE 7105 PELICAN ISLAND DR TAMPA FL 33634 - 7461 HILDEBRAND, WILLIAM O JR 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 107 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 KELLEY, PAUL KELLEY, TRACEY 667 BAY ESPLANDE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1550 KOZIK, CHRISTIAN A KOZIK, ROBERT D 852 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - • FERGUSON, MELODIE A PENNOCK, ROBERT M 665 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1598 FLORIDA POWER CORP PO BOX 14042 ST PETERSBURG FL 33733 - 4042 GEOMAR HOLDINGS INC 115 ARGYLE KIRKLAND QC H9H 31-19 00030 - CANADA HAYS, WILLIAM D 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 304 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536 HOLDEN, ROBERT L 12 STILLWATER HEIGHTS DR WEST BOYLSTON MA 01583 - 1122 KEYS, RANDALL A 6713 E WHITEWAY DR TAMPA FL 33617 - 3216 KRAMER, TERESA A RADFORD, MAXWELL M 3614 S GARDENIA DR 1131 TAMPA FL 33629 - LA RISA DEVELOPMENT CO LLC 880 MANDALAY AVE # C-908 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - LEWINSKI, WOJCIECH LEWINSKI, HANNA 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 306 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 LENTRICCHIA, DOMENICK LENTRICCHIA, KARIN 814 NARCISSUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334 LOLOS, DINOS LOLOS, DIMITRA 627 KINKAID DES PLAINES IL 60016 - 5855 LONG, MARIAN C MAGILL, ROBERT P MAVITY, LEON L 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 104 584 BAY ESPLANADE # 2 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 307 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1537 MC FADDEN, ARLENE S MC KINNEY, CARMELLA C • MC SWEENEY, GARY W MC FADDEN, ROBERT G MC KINNEY, GEORGE L MC SWEENEY, CARMEN 661 POINSETTIA AVE #204 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 210 20942 E GLEN HAVEN CIR CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1535 NORTHVILLE MI 48167 - 2465 MERRITT, GORDON E MICHAEL, BASKOVICH MOSSER, RICHARD S MERRITT, M SUZANNA MICHAEL, SANDRA 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 301 661 POINSETTIA AVE 2866 QUAIL HOLLOW RD W CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1536 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1561 CLEARWATER FL 33761 - NATSIS, EVANGELOS NEIL, MARIE-THERESE NORTH CLEARWATER BEACH NATSIS, MARIA 4 RUE DE SAVOIE DEVELOP 622 POINSETTIA AVE PARIS 75006 00017 - PO BOX 4189 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1638 FRANCE CLEARWATER FL 33758 - 4189 OSTROWSKI, JOZEF P R M II INV CORP INC PARALITICCI, JESUS OSTROWSKI, RENATA 584 BAY ESPLANADE 611 POINSETTIA AVE # 103 64 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1613 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1608 PARKS, DANA L PASQUALE, JACK R THE PIOLI, RICHARD T THE BARKES, MICHAEL G PASQUALE, PATRICIA A THE PIOLI, ROBERTA B THE 11961 LOCUST LN 1433 NORMAN DR 750 ISLAND WAY # 402 COLUMBUS IN 47201 - DARIEN IL 60561 - 4434 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1820 PORPOISE INN INC MICHAEL G THE PRESTON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 609 CYPRUS AVE , 419 EASTSHORE DR ASSOCIATES CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1621 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2028 12003 LILLIAN AVE SEMINOLE FL 33772 - RADAY, DAVID M RHOADS, JEFFREY L THE ROBERT SZASZ YOUNG, SEAN PO BOX 861 1860 NORTH FORT HARRISON 12003 LILLIAN AVE N DUNEDIN FL 34697 - 0861 AVENUE SEMINOLE FL 33778 - 3504 CLEARWATER, FL 33755 ROLLINSON, ANN C ROZENITS, FRED RUSULIS, ELAINE THE 1364 ELLINGTON RD ROZENITS, ANNA 31 ISLAND WAY # 602 SOUTH WINDSOR CT 06040 - 2403 31 ISLAND WAY # 1002 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2206 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 2207 SCHAPER, CHARLES F SEIFERT, MICHAEL E SILLASEN, SEAJAYE 580 BAY ESPLANADE SEIFERT, NANCY S 12313 W LOUISIANA AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1609 5825 PERSIMMON DR LAKEWOOD CO 80228 - MADISON WI 53711 - 5003 SMITH, RUPERT W JR SNO-BIRD PROP INC SOBOLESKI, JAMES W SMITH, IRENE V 10 PRINCE ST 191 DEVON DR 661 POINSETTIA AVE # 106 CUMBERLAND CTR ME 04021 - 4007 CLEARWATER FL 33767 - CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1534 SPEAR, ROBERT E THE 102 CARRIAGE SQUARE CT HENDERSONVILLE NC 28791 - 1396 THOMPSON, MICHAEL S THOMPSON, MARIA BRENDON FEN POND RD IGTHEHM NEAR SEVEN OAKS KENT TN15 9JE 00003 - GREAT BRITAIN TSETSE LLC 5210 WEBB RD TAMPA FL 33615 - 4518 WICKY, JERRY E WICKY, BETTY W PO BOX 1191 OLDSMAR FL 34677 - 1191 YEAROUT, JAMES 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1334 SPERELAKIS, NICHOLAS SR SPERELAKIS, DOLORES J 12114 PAULMEADOWS DR CINCINNATI OH 45249 - 1330 THURMOND, WILLIAM H THURMOND, CAROL H PO BOX 478 NEW ELLENTON SC 29809 - 0478 VASILOUDES, PANAYIOTIS VASILOUDES, HELEN 767 BAY ESPLANADE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WINCHESTER, GARY WINCHESTER, PAMELA 17111 HANNA RD LUTZ FL 33549 - 5666 YEAROUT, JANE R YEAROUT, JANET A 806 NARCISSUS CLEARWATER BCH FL 33767 - 1334 STANLEY, BRYAN J 114 TURNER ST CLEARWATER FL 33756 - TSE TSE LLC 610 MANDALAY AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - WALLACE, A BARBARA 606 CYPRUS AVE CLEARWATER FL 33767 - 1620 WOSCHITZ, EVA THE 302 POINSETTIA LAND TRUST 10 COURTWOOD PL TORONTO ON M2K 1Z9 00030 - CANADA 0 Tefft, Robert From: Rice, Scott Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 10:16 AM To: Tefft, Robert Subject: FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Rob, Engineering has completed review of the subject resubmittal and updated Permit Plan. The only condition of approval is: Condominium plat for "Venetian Pointe" shall be recorded with Pinellas County prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for this development. D. Scott Rice Land DeveL Engr. Manager 727-562-4781 scott.rice@MyClearwater.com Tefft, Robert From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:09 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: FYI -----Original Message----- From: Reid, Debbie Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 3:24 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Sherry, have checked on all of these and P&P is okay on all of them. Thanks! Debbie O -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:45 PM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High Good Afternoon, Case- FLD2005-05051- 445 Hamden Drive has arrived it is also in the same location Thank you Sherry Watkins -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schoditer 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by noon today and Adams Mark & Opus due by Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, Tefft, Robert From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:00 AM To: Planning Subject: FW: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: FYI- Email from Anne Blackburn - Fire Thank you Sherry -----Original Message----- From: Blackburn, Anne Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 4:05 PM To: Watkins, Sherry Subject: RE: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Hi Miss Sherry, checked the resubmittals listed below in your e-mail and listed below is the current status as per Fire: FLD2005-05037 - Conditions Met FLD2005-05046 - Conditions Met FLD2005-05044 - Conditions Not Met FLD2005-05043 - Conditions Not Met FLD2005-05042 - Conditions Not Met FLD2005-06052 - Conditions Met FLD2005-05038 - Conditions Met LUZ2005-05009 - Conditions Met checked these resubmittals today, and based on the info included in the resubmittals, the above listed indicates the status. Thanks for all your help, Sherry, Anne -----Original Message----- From: Watkins, Sherry Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 7:56 AM To: Planning; DRC Members; Gluski, Roberta; Herman, Sandra; Hufford, Diane; Jeffries, Teresa A.; Pulizotto, Lynne; Reid, Debbie; Strong, Steve Subject: Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: Importance: High DRC Members, Plans for the following cases have been resubmitted for the August 16, 2005, CDB meeting: 1. FLD2005-05037 -1105 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 2. FLD2005-05046 - 700 Druid Road Planner Wayne Wells 3. FLD2005-05044 - 629 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 4. FLD2005-05043 - 651 Bay Esplanade Planner Robert Tefft 5. FLD2005-05042 -1254 Grove Street Planner Robert Tefft 6. FLD2005-06052 -1415 San Juan Court Planner John Schodlter 7. FLD2005-05038 -1520 Saturn Avenue Planner Robert Tefft 8. LUZ2005-05009 -1532 S Highland Avenue Planner Mike Reynolds I have placed one copy of the case resubmittal package on the cabinets outside of Room 216 in our office for your review (please do not take it, as we need it for the CDB mail out). Please review your comments/conditions for this case in Permit Plan and determine if they are met. Whether the conditions are "met" or still "not met," please affirm to me via email. Please have these cases reviewed, if possible by 12:00 pm on Tuesday, July 13, 2004. We also have 2 cases coming by on today and Adams Mark & Opus due Gy Monday, July 11,2005 by Noon I will keep you up to date as those other 4 cases come in. Thank you and Have a great day, ,? Sherry Watkins FAX MESSAGE 0 CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S MYRTLE AVE. P O BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748 OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567 FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576 TO: Robert Szasz FAX #: 727.467.0732 FROM: Mark T. Parry, Planning Department, City of Clearwater DATE: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 MESSAGE: RE: 629 Bay Esplanade; FLD2005-05044 Robert, The application is complete. I've also emailed and mailed this letter to you. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me directly at 727.562.4558. NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Two (2) ??ii110 LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • • CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (727) 562-4576 June 7, 2005 Mr. Robert Szasz 1860 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue Clearwater, 17133755 RE: FLD2005-05044 -- 629 Bay Esplanade -- Letter of Completeness for Flexible Development approval to permit 20 attached dwellings in the Tourist District and an increase in height from 35 feet to 58 feet (as measured from base flood elevation to the roof deck), an increase in the height of a parapet wall from 30 inches to 42 inches and a reduction the rear (north) setback from 20 feet to 3.33 feet to pool deck and six feet (to pool), as part of a Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Project under the provisions of Section 2-803.C. Dear Mr. Szasz: The Planning Staff has entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05044. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Complete. A Preliminary Plat application and $600 application fee is required. The Development Review Committee (DRC) will review the application for sufficiency on June 30, 2005, in the Planning Department conference room - Room 216 - on the second floor of the Municipal Services Building. The building is located at 100 South Myrtle Avenue in downtown Clearwater. Please call Sherry Watkins, Administrative Analyst, at 727-562-4582 no earlier than one week prior to the meeting date for the approximate time that your case will be reviewed. You or your client (as applicable) must be present to answer any questions that the DRC may have regarding your application. Additional continents may be generated by the DRC at the time of the meeting. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727-562-4558 or mark.pgM@myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Mark T. Parry, Consulting Planner S. (Planning DepartmentICD BIFLEX (FLD)IPending cases)Up for the next DRCIBay Esplanade 629 M3B Development (T) - MTPWay Esplanade 629 letter of completeness. doc BRIAN I. AUNGST, MAYOR FRANK HIBBARD, VICE MAYOR HOYT HAMILTON, COUNCILMEMBER BILL JONSON, COUNCILMEMBER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, COUNCILMEMBER "EQUAL EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE AC'110N EMPLOYER 0 0 FAX MESSAGE ' CITY OF CLEARWATER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING PLANNING DEPARTMENT 100 S MYRTLE AVE. P O BOX 4748 CLEARWATER, FL 33758-4748 OFFICE PHONE - (727) 562-4567 FAX PHONE - (727) 562-4576 TO: Robert Szasz FAX #: 727.467.0732 FROM: Mark T. Pam Planning Department, City of Clearwater DATE: Friday 27, 2005 MESSAGE: Robert, The application is incomplete. Please see the following letter for details. I've also emailed and mailed this letter to you. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting me directly at 727.562.4558. NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): Three (3) -..ATER, If LONG RANGE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Robert Szasz 1860 N. Ft. Harrison Avenue Clearwater, F133755 C ITY OF C LEARW TER PLANNING DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 4748, CLEARWATER, FLORIDA 33758-4748 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING, 100 SOUTH MYRTLE AVENUE, CLEARWA.TER, FLORIDA 33756 TELEPHONE (727) 562-4567 FAx (72-7) 562-4576 May 27, 2005 RE: FLD2005-05043 -- 629 BAY ESPLANADE -- Letter of Incompleteness Dear Mr. Szasz : The Planning Staff has • entered your application into the Department's filing system and assigned the case number: FLD2005-05043. After a preliminary review of the submitted documents, staff has determined that the application is Incomplete with the following comments. 1. The Comprehensive Infill Redevelopment Criteria did not appear to be submitted with the application. They are provided below and need to be address on or before noon June 7, 2005 in order to be placed on the June 30, 2005 DRC agenda: a) The development or redevelopment of the parcel proposed for development is otherwise impractical without deviations from the use, intensity and development standards; b) The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will not reduce the fair market value of abutting properties; c) The uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are otherwise permitted in the City of Clearwater; d) The uses or mix of uses within the comprehensive infill redevelopment project are compatible with adjacent land uses; e) The development of the parcel proposed for development as a comprehensive infill redevelopment project will upgrade the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; f) The design of the proposed comprehensive infill redevelopment project creates a form and function which enhances the community character of the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; g) Flexibility in regard to lot width, required setbacks, height and off-street parking are justified by the benefits to community character and the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development and the City of Clearwater as a whole; h) Adequate off-street parking in the immediate vicinity according to the shared parking formula in Division 14 of Article 3 will be available to avoid on-street parking in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development; and i) The design of all buildings complies with the Tourist District design guidelines in Division 5 of Article 3. BRIAN J. ALINGST, MAYOR S. IPlanning Department6? rZk$tF"X?(FiA&Vqff WletelBay Esplanade 629 M3B Develop q I (?1 ?$Sayt Cpl ti nar??,? ?i ?atnplete letter.doc BILL JONSON, COUNCILRIE.NMER CARLEN A. PETERSEN, CO1!NCI1,%1EA1B[R "EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT A1ID AHMMAIIVE ACTION EMPLOYEP," May 27, 2005 Szasz - Page Two 2. Section E. Stormwater Plan Submittal Requirements was not addressed. Please submit all required documentation per this section on or before noon June 7, 2005 in order to be placed on the June 30, 2005 DRC agenda. Specifically, a narrative describing the proposed stormwater control plan including all calculations and data necessary to demonstrate compliance with the City manual. 3. A tree survey was not submitted with this application per Section F of the application. This needs to be submitted to Staff on or prior to noon June 7, 2005 in order to be placed on the June 30, 2005 DRC agenda. 4. Will the units be owner occupied? If so, then a Preliminary Plat is required to submitted concurrently with this application. 5. Submit the following information/items as required in Section G of the application: All required setbacks. 6. Clarify if signage will be provided on site. 7. Section K of the application was not addressed. Complete this section on or before noon June 7, 2005 in order to be placed on the June 30, 2005 DRC agenda. Section 4-202 of the Community Development Code states that if an application is deemed incomplete, the deficiencies of the application shall be specified by Staff. No further development review action shall be taken until the deficiencies are corrected and the application is deemed complete. Please resubmit by noon June 7, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 727.562.4558 or at markparry(a),myclearwater.com. Sincerely yours, Mark T. Parry Consulting Planner S:IPlanning DepartmentlCD BIFLEX (FLD)VncompletelBay Esplanade 629 M3B Development (7)Way Esplanade 629 incomplete letter.doc